Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 01Brad Medrud AHBL, Inc. PARTIES OF RECORD Lindbergh HS Site Improvements LUAll-012, SA-A Rick Stracke Vicki Maddy 2215 N 30th Street ste: #300 Tacoma, WA 98403 Executive Director Facilities & Operations Renton School District #403 7812 S 134th Street Seattle, WA 98178 16713 128th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 tel: (253) 216-3219 (party of record) tel: (253) 383-2422 eml: bmedrud@ahbl.com ( contact) Updated: 03/30/11 tel: ( 425} 204-4403 (owner/ applicant) (Page 1 of 1) City ot Renton Planning Division MAU I O Lu11 f?d~<ef OW~[Q) ' i ti . ' ' l/') I- z LU :::E LU > 0 c::: a.. :::E LU I- l/') ....J 0 0 :I: u l/') :I: C> :I: :I: (!) c::: LU cc 0 z ....J M = -.:r =II: I- u c::: I- l/') 0 ....J 0 0 :I: u l/') z 0 I- z LU c::: C 0 ~ C ~ • • " " 0 C • ~ E • • .... :; • ~ 0. ~ c::: a.. l/') - 3:: LU > LU c::: z <( ....J a.. ::: LU 0 N I-~ w ·-c ~ ·-v l/') ro N ·-> i• l!-1 ffi!ES' :;; 11 ,~:1, 111-• I !ad! • ' ii' "!St;:;~ g~~J:il!! :1;§!-:5 II !!hi l ' ~i i ,. .. ~::, I I ji Ii, .. !il lii!! l'i•' lL,iU ?;; t" I L 1;11 .!)' _. ~, I 1,·~, ~lj; pg12 HB ' li11, 1 llii! . ' ' ,, -, ~~ ~;i ! ii 0~ ' Ii: :,.i! -i!," I:, i I i ~!a~d ' ' ' I· ' ! , ,r ! / _- .. . ;i ' -.. _: l '-2 --~-' ! ~-~~-+-----~' ~ i ' • C 0 -• > • ~ ~ ., t;; w r "' ~ w > 0 u 5f • ~ s I h ; h I I 2}~ ~ ~ ir ~~; I a :tl!l!nl!h!!i ,hi !,h ,!iilll,! ,a Ii ! ~~Al~~'-.:•~,~~• I~~ ~~~a~~ I~ -~1 ~-; ,,_~. r ~ ' . , ll!i I " · I _ 11' I ;: ·~ a i I~ ~-ii I liM!!h,H!I, Ii n 1huli:hhm.i1.;1 ' s . . ,~?~hh~ ... t~,h f ~~~uh hh~i1h1;:n ~ 'j ' ' I ' 'lill 1 ·• •! 1' ·• • -1 ' ·' I .; m!hl!!hh i!IH!!!!li H!!!lh 1 .~f\i,nUU11liH; ~a~o ~aaHlft~~ 11.:u~ ,, ,, " = = 1,0 IC) -----'----- :· :·:: . , .... ,-: I ,,--1 ! 1't-J ,- ' -, I r~, ----I;, -' I ' ' 1· "" ---,-----~ j, .. --\ <·::)' '.L-( I ' _____ cc l-: ___ .L v_\J/ ,l-s\ --1 ~------~--~-r--"~\ · \ _L -... ~ .. ,,,,-.,,. '• ,,,€i, IIIU '" ..... k.;.....:' I Call SCALE 1"-80' before yn11 Ojg @ 8-1-1 or 1-A00-424-5555 PAOPERll AREA AAEACFWOII( ANTD'ATID EXCAVA"JXXt ~624,BOO SF 234,0:16 SF 30,0C() CT (6,750 TONS) ANOCl'AlID t.f'OOTED MAlERAL: 15,00'.:I C'f (3,375 TOM3) NOTE EXCAVATED MAlEAfAI... SHALL BE HALlEO OFF-3TE TO AN Af'f'AOVED LOCAT)'.).l t.f'OffTED MATERL4.L SI-W.l BE SCWCED LCCill Y FROM AN N'PRO~ QUARRY City of Renton Plcw,n,n<:J Division f,j;.. l ii . ,·:; lb) /§" rt' 1~· a 1117 'e iE5' n) ___ :3 ~ -4 fl ts I.Y ,:;ot,~l>'l \Jl5GN ~P!'ROVAI -.1<>.or ··1 . ' '""'"'-----'''" "'""' '"!""' '" ..,,,,,,.'L,.,,...,.. -~ . l".'".' "'""""'"" • oJ,•.L ·-·~·.,,o, '~"-' "' ! ~'.';'.';'"""'--~""' ""' c; 7 C)C) ,, ,1·, I! I r i·- Ii ' I: • ,j 4b 11..: ,, 1 I • 1' I \ i ~ , I ' I ~! "' 'I ' ' ~i \ .. ' I '' ' I ' ,, I i:, I .,.,,,,., I ,, I ,,· • ' t'; I I I - I r I Ii I ,1 I I' Ii 'I Ii ,: I, I I, C: 0 ...., C Cl> cc .... 0 ~ .§ U) --~ 0 D: (; c- I i Ii ii ' ' , __ .,) I ' ' I; _i· 'I I 0: I I, ' J ' I / / / 1' '/,; /,/ "/ \ (6) /> V, " M u " • ~ V, • • V, ' • C ::, ~ u " " I N 0 C") u I I I I I I : I _ __J_~----__ L.::.'..Leo.--·J ________ Jl::.::::L.,c.-" _ _Jt;'2_, ____ ·---, _,-L--~-,.-, _ w w en ,!/ , l""'""'"~-b _· -····----=--:-:-... ' -----:--t' I.----._ ..... /;~----' .,.. • I)'-...._ -}···<~~::--.:./!. ' ' -' / ,·1- \' , ..... -.... , '' . ·:::,... \ I ,-...'.• ~.:.. ~'~~' --\ , '"-,'' .I,--~~-. (/ !,, , '), , \,,_Vj , '-'•.'/ '/J :_j -• \ ( / ,~' I '-.. "-..(,;:;;:, • ./ _ '-1~ JI .-~ • \ . '", '-., /'-/ /.' ' "'· '.'l,:ji«~:-1 J ? r,_L ....... :.-------=== L,.,". "' }/,/ ./'·/ ""1 . U··\,·· ' ' . J, -j""""""''"' ~ ~·\;>~' . ·,,, ;(_.., ~"'·::,:: ,~\--"''' ' ------~ ''"" \ \~ "-~ -/' .. ;/'fil· ·0 "-...,_ I>// Y ''<"'-~ \ ,;:-'"\ \ ·,,." .. .::, /\~ •...__ i J1 , / , ::\\.'- \:- "'''", , -, ', ,dp., '-,/ ,_! X /' ~~'-n·. "-. ./ , . ·-, / "<.'-...,,_ '{t.·\ · · 0 \ ' -.. -' '/·· ~--('. I -~/ .,;-.._ ., , .. _." ' l • l h'V I \ 1 --~ ·, · -\ ':,;\ _-,11',; 11 ,__ , x,_."_' ,, ·:-, /!.'!; I· ,, ' N' \·.\_~ \ -/':, ' 'j I / I/''-~ \~<'_\ -'\;, ' Pi' I ' ,,,v -~ -... /cl ' / ' ::(-:.\ ~-i\\._. • --; /--, y;.,,,_ <·- -~-'. \ ~----_ / A• 1-\ ',, _ i',7 \', ',L · , '·-'l ,;,,;-'' \ /'' r~ , ""''' ' -.; ,. \-'~ ;, I'-.. // ~ , , ",, , ,,,. 7-~~,:v ::\-~, ~,, ,. , ~ '>- / , / "'''"-''' ,-'_\ -\ / : ' \ / ~-,,_ .,.,,,, ,-:::, / / ' _,/ \'' ;.,, \ '::--:-'-., / o•• ,._,,;'. ,·\\. '°' '<:_~ I\ \ •• " I :." )<:\ ' ~(i ' \'.• ' 1,1, \ :·:' ,:\ 1\\ ' \' .,..,,.( ,,,_ ,\ ;'. ,.,~····.' , .. / /.;_,,?"\\· ,,\ •;,, r· /·"' ·--~·'•-'/\\\_ ,,, / h-.,,;,,·· '' ·. -, __ _ \rv/ '•.-,. /-:.r., W•· ~.::,•\, . :,•,,,, ;,,,} '-<;;,/' ,,,;,:'\ <~ - ' '~/.'.:·· ~;.,:: ._';,. '~ ·~'f>-• ~---•. \ \') < .. fi, \ ::\• • --\\ ( A __ vd---.J\ -·,;,, , \' ,-- r--"(, > ·-~~~ \\ :>.. ' ! /. '.···.. ·' \. . \ ) • ._·,,. ·m I '·,\i, '\ ,:.~, ,, .... , Maleh Li:·1e -See $heel c3 04 -~"'"""''"·,,.· .... ,~- '''"" "" ,·>r 0 10 X, <0 ·-------·1 SCALE r-20" @ Call before you Dia 6-1·1 or I -800-424-5555 -"""'"-~"'"'•=· City Of Aenton Pf,,nninq 1J,·v1·s " IO() I ii , /RJ ~ ({;}~!.l llf ff},'[()) ~'-"'nP l DES Gt/ A"PRO",A; -·/!l"' "'"'"'--~ ,,.,, ....... . ---, ........ "" =~...,.,...,... ~~··· •·•1•·1_ ""'')"°'' '"~' C<J•."-S'l ''""''""'"' """'""'"'-"'''"' ......... ..,.,,,os, COH~P.~~ ,::i,,,..,iC ~,a c:5.Cj , . ' ' ,. -~·-... 8L'll '-PP'~ r:: r 0 .9 -r:: Vi s (l) 6 er ..... o; 0 s C: >.. ..., "' c3 ii a I i Cg " ,':, TlfLfl i ! =-, ;! ~ ,,:0 = lliYJ ~ ---::. -c /U'ul --= @;: ' ,.,~x '~;~~'.~'\ C: C (gJ 0 0 [ld1i] .... -~ C: > ~ Q) a: 0 = G .-UUl -i::: 0 ~ g ;.,,, 0 ~ fULJ, u ' :cir' -= to·;:::, :ic1a'-1S aas 8.J.l ,pp~ \ -~ ~·------!,-.'..:....__ ' ----.-~t-:: .---·--. .) ' ··-----.. -.-; . ' ' ' ' g l J' I . i ' / ' . ' I ,c \;---....--: ., ' I' I I I I I I I ,, I/ !..,: _}~ r- re. '' I. ( I' r I' -.---------i=-,, ii ' I C: 0 ..., C: il.) 0: -0 ~ (.) C 0 (' ~ '(/) -~ 0 0, ·c C Cl Q_ ' •' / / '··~-.· ~~im ' , .. ' ' ' • C: 0 -C: '1) 0:: -0 >, .'!: (,) (Q C !1J1il 0 'if) ~ > = C -!Ln} ::._,--:,. (g C C: ifu1 " C. ~ / ' ft RtW ,· ' ,. ' ;:'. '·1--,., ' ,_ ! i I I I 0 0 ..;j u ~J ·h I. ' ' ,j ' I 11 l I,. i''.; ' 1: -, i, ,! I ' I, I I la I • I, I I _,,, ):! \\ ·11 ·,,\'' :\ ·, .. ) ~ ... ' I.• d . t~ \' . "'i\ ' , ~ if!;; :!! rl \\\ : ltf-' -\\ ' ' ;, ' .; . ·"''°"·'..'. \ -t\-: ij,f I , , . 111 • ,I> ~r ' 1\1 ~t, ,~ 1 1 "" 7 .. · \, ·~ :: '' · ·~jt~~i-~;r~1~~--'::_:i .. ~ --+--=•~· -'-=--~---c ~i-·. _,-,-, ~~-.. ' •• .-.d·' -·'~;~ --=----~--=-~-----_ _, __ ---·=-------~=-_-_ ~~-~~:-:-_-_ --=~-·=-= .o;~ ,=..___. ____ -, -"'=---- -- ,• 1' ~ ' ' ' d ,j 8 C: C ©l 0 0 Mn -[fJ ~ C: ·:; (!) Q = 0: ruril rn L::::=.) -C: g 0 >, •• e m @' .t:: Cl. ,nc (.) '~- ::. -. -···· . r···-- / .. .:/ -:-.-.---~-~~.-~"'"~-:-_-. -. .-f:,whfo:~ I ·, ,, r > f ·' ...!, I \.'----=----'. I ---- " ' I -1 '· ,,/ ,\',, / 1' ,. !l ·. \ ,,!: ' I ' qi, 1 ; •, ! Ii <~ ' \~ ,, ,, . . \ Ii \ \ ' "I " I, ' \ -' i' N ;I 0 : ~ --i ! u C: 0 C IQ) .... 0 C: 0 ild1JJ <l> .:::: a: 0 ~ .... rn = 0 -~ ~ >, cg .... e; ·-0:: "(Jl ' (.) w ;fR ' i La ~. :: I ,, ,, j -4 ' I 11 ri -~ 1. I ' I I I ' ' -J" -~ :) I I I I ' I. 4 I ' \. ! !; '.!~ l: I C ·,·- ~ I . ~ ! ' . I ' ' § C 0 ...., t: I' I ' I I II C .Q -~ <l> er a ' >:" '1.) /~ '1.J { ;; U) ' C -·~-:;_:-_:-:.I G~ ·.·~~--'--: ~ /<:-:-:;:~-;:,:'.-:__:j .:._:: </\\ • ;l:;:i/'{ 0\ I '. . · .•. \ j &u11 v:q.ori . ! : f ' ; ·/ l [ ' ~ ' ' 8 C: C: 0 .Q .,... C: Cf) (1) 5: er 6 .... '-'· 0 C .c ~ ~ ·-Q. (.) , . .. ;j' /\ ,, If ©J {y)j] ~ = {y)j] fJ) . ii 1i :'; ~ 'Rr I..'.::'_"':::! ' v._ ,' /I ==-'-[ -"v- //~ /-;;, · ,, """""'-~"I;, 1<"' JO" ""'~""' ''''" ..... -r-/ -Ii ·U /' Maleh l ·ne See Sheel c4.02 '01? -,: ~~m:v·., '\. ··,:,\ Jc :~~--":\\~, ' ' :_,, -\ ',Ll ' , -\ -~ ;::<;::_;::_, -:-_ C"o'--,, \ ;. 'i ~p'";:; ·,~" ·mt~-~- 1.-/ / '(,· /r i. / ' ' I I \ '\ \c.·~1~,11·:a<•-; 1 1 I -: ''tt,; " _'\ "1 ._, I t'<", t' ' \ ..... , . ~'~~" ~-], ' ' ' F / I j ','</I' \ \ ,:) >~-:' \ ' ' ,~ c , ',( , ,, I_ \ ···;\ \ .i l"''""'-"'ll(lj_ I """''°'""'°'"<,mi, ' - l~~~~-~-1 \\'' ~;~,, /• ---' ','I-,: /C\)1./j, ·;;,,.\;1 · -, :,fJf~,;! )1 < -, ··~ i: -.~-., ', si\,, I I ... /If .,,. 0 ,- u w " L ,n ~ L /1! --I I ' P,,,., / /.-' r-, ' / \ -._ / """' '.\:· <-. # / .• ' '\ ,, ./ ' \_,/-/'-.i' --' C. 0 0 ::, ~ Call SCALE 1'-20' before yuu @ Dia e-1-1 or 1~.;.~}!.-.~s.~~ City of Renton Pianuirig Division ,,'I I ;) IRf ~-CG~ D \\f [t [[5) COOU-Pl ll(';•C:~J /1.PP'<(JVAL OHii;aiin 'I ~ •' ~ -.,, ...... Jj""'"°'LWOOI< ............ , =~<l,lll()(R· -,b.q~"' """"'"''"'""'""''" '"""" ~· h;,.,,..,,,,1,,., '''""''"'"""""" ""'"'"-"'"'' c4.C:; :j' ii :t,; ,. 1·1 11 T ::· i ., ___ ,,,_ -----1 :': 1 · i ·I . i· i 'I. 1·1 ' .,-t_::,, 111'·'.ti':::, ', r.,1·· : _' ·"1 '.;.;_ i ! 1' . ,-1 ·. I ',1• r.-' I 'I' ! I ~' ' ·1 .::_ 1 _·1/·f1, I - I. I' ' ·· __ :_ ·-· _-'-I -~,·~ I; , ,, .. -I I, r-:~,. 111 , I; .. :· IF. I , ... . •'1.;. f ·1 ) I-: . -j: 11 ,I I! ~, /,,' ·· I. i '". ~ ;ri-' 'i r I ;// 'I ' ' . / I I I I It 1 ''.i,l ' ·I 11' ·/<'\ -(~_::·'._·-. ·_ -/~.~ ''··, \ : 1 lt-:..~~~:J/ \ . \ ' / .1 / _ ;j_,_· -' ·"i' .. '. I •' .I I ' : / ·' .:'if;:·:;., . ' , 1-: ! . r,,,.., I -I- I/~_\,..· ___ _ ! I '·,,\ -; ·-f /J,!g '. ,\: -,-;;, ,,; . ' (Fs_g·ii,;'.b /M':i--0 ;;j" Call SC-ALE 1'•20' ~o._ ·, before you Dia 0-1-1 or 1-800-424-5555 --'"-""''" '· ~·, ' c--. C, ,i u ':y,,::1-~ "'" 't.,(/) . : l·. ,_ ....._, ,_; :'i/li.1~_.Q) -,, .'..J"· Hir (~ . r :/:,; ~'.~:··'. f t,&:::";1 0 , -./1 ·iA ,, -' 1_,.r.·-'r~.:1 \,11)_1_ ~ \~f\ ... .,;J ~-., ~ I I ,-, -'--- /1 . _;::; ·, / { 'I •.f.C,., - 1;-\.\/_i_:-:7<(~, // -"/ / ·, ;:i j•,.: Q ::, )' ·r'.,· ./1 ' ·, I; I ''"''. I . !, ' . . /J . \ :-'/r·· ·r .. •(;;;' . ·-\' '-cI/ . '--. --_1· ,-__ ' . ' -. '•,/ (' ' ·''1· '-,' 1· '-:~;;;,: I fill :! I • , '--..,, .\._;,, -----·-""'--·---··· --"',---f;!.,11/"-' -~~ I ,I· 1 --~ 'lt-,, tt., <•<,O<ll•i',W -%,-,,.~~ . / i;+•;ecc· ..... · ..•.. ~:T,;~:;7=':cr~~°f=~~··~ .·: :-;~~~~~t~}~~~:U.,-~~'~_-_~-,_-.-_-_-_~t _ -----~-----~ ll,,--1· -1 _'_wj/' ... j-· •0 ::, j ; 1 1 :11 I Ii ·I City of Renton coor.rr1 orm1 APPROV>l ""2/'l ~H'"""' _... P/arwiin_,1 l-Jr·v·(~· OOl(R"""' ~ 1-,IOfl ·-.... ""' &~ I~ re lli:: U W1 ~ [[5) '""'"'---~ ""''""'" ,. ".' "'. ~'II..,.,..,.._. -~ o.mi.i/~··· ION '""-""'-'' "" '~"-''' '" '''"'"""'''"'" """'"'""'"'""'"-W,1'(1. "'' c_:/. C.~b -..-----~ --- ~ --- ~ . ,~.t' ,;i,:: .. ~:-., -..... -' ' ' : u ~ [ ,. ~~ i ii: -, (· " . / .,.:'' .• .r . ' ' ; ~ ' s _,-,, ! ! , ' ' ' ' ' C: 0 .... C: (jJ a:: 7· ~---1-,,.-:-, . i . ' ,. ' ' '. I ' ' 0 0 : LO ' u I i ' 1 / I -----~-- I ''· ,- ~ I : II I ' .I ' ti ' l J1 l\~\, '; \ ' \ I .\ '\ 1 I , 1 ,\ ~- _e C: 0 -C: (l.> er ----~-c~,~c:,~;m!lli;~ _,. ~--_. d i • II ~ I oz -;;;,;,c-f--' ._i _l_i ------+-=z:....::__,t:_' ____ _, 1 !:'_I 1_._i _ 1 ._i Llj (\ \ \ ! . \ \ 1. l!)~ I' u I I ,, " ~- •• "" ' I ' ' \_: ~ ' I _-JJ I ' ' I t t I \. ' . j ,, ' I ,, • '~~ J; 'cl ' y . ' 0 ... j - J '·-_, ,,: : __ _; · . .. ·:,'·· <\\ [yV) -::_.,/\. t:: 0 C ...., 0 i:: ,;; (!) s er c , -~-, i/~'· %_ I •• _. ·._ ' I ;~r:0t~'o<~~~~>) • S/ ~ rr,: ----,,s.,_ __ -,-.. --, _______ ____., __ , __ ------ ' '--·-. ' c, --. ---.---.-- ' ' ' I ~l ' /, i '\.:' ' ,_ \ ... :{ I.,./ \ ' µ I, ;:, -, ' ,, I I I : , I I ! '' ; ; ( ' e 'i 8 ,i C: 0 t: -0 C: .0 (l) > er: 6 .... 0, 0 ~ E: '.?;, ::;; ·-Q u :~-- I {QJ 11M ~ = {cJL7 ~ ~ i'JJL7 ~, 1fjr= = ), / -)-,,._, . }~i~l -:_:? __ :)_/\\- -. '-.. --// :_---_ ,:!( 'Z;, -# /_-, -- .-¥/·_,:.~·-:. 1 ,. t~t1 ., ,_ ~-, C C 0 ...., 0 C .0 (l\ > a: i:5 ;20 ,·.:; .... 0 C: >, .... C: --·-Q () ,( ' i-\----·--- : { i r ;f. ' [Q] /1I'tlJ ~ = nJ1J1 g 'LfLf/ 13? I:='.:=, -; ~,-- •• !'' . t ' ' --' i . : ' • I~ ' i ~ I 1 I ' ' I-§ 11 ' ! h' 1' J -*:-*}' -1 -<·/, ()\I' l I t 1:1 " ' iJ . ~ . ' I : I .~ l J ,, . -:s·~·•· .. ., .. ,><© ,.. "''''"''"""" ,\1 - - Sheel~l .1 -,_ ---.... ,:, ',j'.J -:-·:.::_,~ CJ __ (. ·q· <;le 0 ' 1 ' ~ I ----=-----' --' L~o.--;-{. ,-'4·.'1 • ., -------'~ Shet!t L1 2 View J , 9 " 1 i I ,~'-)"', ""·" .( 0 ''"" \c~:> "(\\. ·'\../):;\ ... _/) \ \ -\j ·,\ ---, . \\,' \ ·\ ' . '\ \ ---·, "/, 0 . . ,(' 'G (,) -. . '): l\, \I o r, CL61~ ~ D /. '1·. i • .. L-~.:.:.T1' ! t.i® !. SHEET NOTES ...... " -""'"'""" _._ ..... , '" -·-~ "'""'°'"" """'"' "' ,,. _ ... Lot~""", ......... ..,._, ..,aL""d-•"""'',.._ fa m,-o ~•~•'""' .....,, ,d,\\•• t,on, ,••• lo rm """'"""""""'"""'•'"-~ "'"'''"' ""' u, S.o CM"""'' ,., "'""""""".., ,...,,., .. ,1.,.mwolH "'"'--'· S. S.o CM .,.,a '"''"'"''"'~ "'°"' f,--'"''" "<_,....,.,wuo,,•""" ... m,<'"•"'""''''"" .. ,,.,..,,,..,."-"'""'"''1-~ .. _.,.. """' ... ~ ... -.. , ... .,,,.,~,.,_ ., "'' '"""--"'°"""'""'""" M,.,_,,...,,,,,....-.. ,,.,...,,..,,...,11.,,,. °"""'.''"'"'°""''~ ...... ,.~ .. -·- LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS ... j-ri,~.i~· ,_ ... .,,. ·-·-"'" ~j ~;-~::..:.·:'!ci.;~. ~.,,7.:~~:-:-:.:::.:~· .~ ...... ,_. 0. On• (2' ~~ -) ... " ·-"' '"'"' '" ~· ~ =:. :.:L= .\'l:!~ ::.',-:':: -· "' ,0 ,,lol"'"""'"""«>o•~o d_ ............... ,.,m .. Olo<>'"'''M'["'l ····-:.~· ......... = .. , ............ ~· , ... ,~""' . c.-·· ··-...... ,..., .... ~"-· ... ~,n~, '""""'"'"'""""""'-''"':"'•I•-"''''' ,-~E=~:.~:~ :,.~ ,,, .. (ll ,. ... " ;:,.,:.,!."' :::..· -~·:~ o. -(>"mm...,,),"" r -J- J, -~·. } I . ~:~.~:;: .......... ,, ... ,"'" C• ~ -.-0, -~ -~ "ti : ·• (1, ~! ;i -~~1- -'Jr(: ~9. :o ' ~ Jb:~f tq .. :· i ...... ··~w-: ~-,r-, :. i;, r (\-i ~ \-. *·O ! ::~;:;:'~"'"" --. c~••'••~-,~ ""'"'"' '" '°"""' ,,, .......... ..-- ,~ --·-· .. , ..... -, '"""""''l'"'l""'•,..., .. , """''""""·~···-loo•('o') _.,,.....,,. ......... ,,., 7""~ kt lcr -r+ ...., ., .............. , ...... ~ ~·J;,".'t,;.~~""''""'' i:.!...*"!!??be- ~ 6it~ of Renton NORTH P/Frlning Divisiorr. "_ ,,, '·=:w SCALE 1''~6o'-O '' ,· .. ' 1 ;? /;.'; ff~[~~[~~~[;;[)) .,,,, .. ,, .... ""''--"""'""""" , ........... ,,. .., .. ~, ...... ,,..,.,.~, ,,,.,.,_.,,., .... , _ ........ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION t, ""'"' --'"'""'°" ,,...,~",:~ .. rec, ~ .,'"'-"'~, , .. , ... =:;•""""v' --- .._ .. ~""' SITE OVERVIEW PLAN L1.0 z 0 ts ~,', ,: d ~ ~ " r ~ 1 ~ I• ,........, ~:L " , I z ~-i' ~i 0 7 Ll uW -a_ ' r « ! [ <{ u ~ • " "' n,n wcz ~-~ i G ~::i ·II· 1 ! ·...1 "' ~ a_ : ~ -------.! C: ' 0 2 .,_, t: Cf, <ll --~ 0: 0 i+,. Q, "-,--US,~#f+~yc;-r-f"'"---, ··, Q C ~·, _J"Qi&i I I [Q) @1J ~ = ·-[L11D -g iiJLI ·-er i,.c; j '!'I I I!. I I ·I"' '"LI I"" :l""'I ,,!,, ~ :, i I ~ ~ ~~!*i~tti~~;~~ ;;;~1n ;;;; ::.'~;. ' • • ' .· -·!·.. . ·I·+. . . ' " I " "·I·. -:.; '· 1 '·:: iiu',iisu,•! !§i:!j§ §!!!' !§!! ~ "!''i'i.S,:~ u u, I~ "··~~ f. t ~~'~j ' 11: 1 ! l,, 1«iJiHJili m,,! _JL ,, __ f ~ !!t ! ~ ~ -~~~h--h!hh!"" "~-;11 Ii ! . i Ii 1!1 II l1!i!!J1J JI ! l! '11 1111 ! I 111' ji ,111111! !h;jil!i!lliil 11': I 1!1!; I!! j j Ii! !ili!l!illil!1 iit!l!!I i l,ll~i!l:I . . n I' I . , ,,. . I , , II · , ! '' -"' ! n I -' "! a r ' IH i' p I'! ~ j ! I i 1:!i•H1 1! IP,I. f ,i , !,l,,!l <> ! I! ·1 ' i1-11·1·1 !,ii!!'il-. '"•l! "'!'II ; 111, !,! ! i 1il,.hl1111i!,IL1!!1 Hhi tiL , i 1 !:1rl111111111!1111iii1 1i11 1,11i 1 n1," ! I . 1.~ ~-:!,,~;;;i::U .. ~-U~ 1 i ~ ~ "r;• ~ ~ --r I •1 • 0 0 <ll ~ 0 0l~'t· 80· © • • , J • 0 -. I ,,_ II -~"'"""""'" I -"" ('! ;.-- '..J ,-"" ~~ .. ~o ~ t; ~~ " "w oC ;-... .e _N '0 'z T m N ~ m 0 w m _N .<Q 0 z ' FAST PITCH FIELD (; -, BAS~BALL Fl~LD ~>-·, >-' \·· ·'< . <}<"-'' LEGEND n::--.. - <8!:: •. ::"....,.'"-·"" @----------(>-a, .. $----- 0 --· G -___ .... •----.. , o----G--··- """''€) ... "'''''"""'"' s--_,. rv--·--·-v -.:,om,°"""'"'""" .. ....___ """"" ,,... ---- ,,._ __ ,...,.,.,._,. ... ....,. _____ , ··--..... -,, ..... _ ...... .... -·----.,_, _ _, _____ ,..,_ -------·'--·---· .,,..,.___,__,..., ----- ____ ,,._,. __ ,,. __ ----t===-"" ·---~.,,--,,,,..,, .,,,_. __ ,,,.. -- '·\,,, :::--\ ------1! GYMNASIUM _......_,, ~----~R~-, TREE UNIT CALCULAT/oNS / ::M;,: / "'"~· (RI)• I '~"""f""·,·..;.11,1~; I,' . 0 1:,, ..L..' . • ~ ll,c ,,m,,..,i,i ,,:iic=r;: ~ ~,2, "1;i--..J~~; ----j<~°-2! ;'l lo . '' 0 er, ~'"""« ;:-,;zy,~-•_ "'-; --, o~.i? i_" ii_.~ .. ~~ ~W,,-. _l!l.....,.Cc ":ti!• . 'e Cf . ' ~ : ' " i": i :{'."/~~ ,•1H,I ' 'i$f ti "Ill ·.I{} ,rj SC ~~ JD~, N 01!,,';,-: 'LC<''•.' WC' ,..._,. ----2 ,..-, -(F ."':n -" '1-.;-w,. '.f) u'V'' oo z. z (t :, ·1 · C~•'.!,~ , I bw "J, '''"'"''""'· ~·_: ,;;,-~~--'l!r,,::' r'-.•. ;,; \' ,, .. ';',\ • . 0-: ,_.,.. ~. -,s,, ---OR , _ -·~ . --(ESf.', NOTF 4~-. '_"_''"ii"'! .. ' f 'll'r, ::E CONSTRUCTION VG 11 t~rj .iJ~~~ ,,..,., HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING ' i . .O:ifcr ·n!' :, 9.· ,~-01'',,,I '" (I:.~ ,. ' ~·01·:~~~1 :·;,-SI~ 'I~., ._cp,')-; City of Renton Pi,u:c1i11q Division I ,, .. : I''/ '',·-.,1c0,1111nre'[JI ,i'U t..: ~ LS LI V'./ ir::; l'Y ', ti" fi' Jff' "' N ,'.;'':'.~ 11: ~tSM '" ~~(Es°M ·'-~- 1.35 (Esf.':- ~ \. _ __) 1,JC11)-11 SCALE. 1"'~50· o· @~ m '"""' ""'"""'"" ,,~"':::~a,i,c· ,;a,,.,,,,.,...,.. ,_ ... '"'"""""'" TREE CUTTING/ LAND CLEARING PLAN ''""'· L2.1 11.J_i Clli I Ii , i ~ ---·---- ,.- ;:;:;:~·, '""'""OC<" '""""'"~'"'" '"'"""""''""'" ""'''""' ~~OIi "" (''"'l 55.3.00' ,.,...,,~·:.~~~' ... : .. ,,'.;'.!~-~'""'' L --I """'"-:....,,,... l"X4" £GENO ~,_..., I r...._ ,,,_,,....,....,. ... e ··-·- • OIi--•-(>-:::. e-----·-·- 9~-- ._..!...::: = ... 0-:~.:. ,o------· ~··- _ ..... g.-, ... """"'®,.,, ............. ,,., ··--r __ ,,, __ ·---.. ._ ...... .,..,..,_ .,,_,_,,,_.,,. . _,...,.,,_,n . ,,_, •.•. .,, .• = ·-------·---·--··-___ , _ ____ ,.., ·---.. ._ ........ _ .. ----t::-:..=-... ·----~..,.--,,_, _.,.._,,,,._.., fil ". a'l ~ 0 ·fief. ,, EXISTING TENNIS couRrs · 0 l'f',;J8.14' ' (~"·:· ~i1JJ'"i ''° t,,' rf (lSM, •. • .r· • "1' )" ;,. -. .;;;..-: . 120 • '# , , ~ -,,s.;; ''>'o. l, ~ 'r,., .''.' · .•.. -.,. -v,w ,_ . · ,1. \ .. .-, .. ' s· )•'•' ... ,;;, V' . ..Jl.j.. C• w. \ !'I fill,,;~-·,N,r,,11~ ·~· 120.1 ~~ •,s, •. ·~- • L (lSM, , C!,~·· : '·. c-1,1 ,:::_~'"'-""::.:, .;.. ·.:· ~ EXISTING MliL TI-USE·FIElD' AND TR.ACK ~ 1:?001 (ES!,,/ .. ' ,1 , <; r•~ (ESM, .,,,,~ ,~ -, \. ' .. ~,.~ .•... ' ;.;,); ~ :0• 'Ill"-' (I' 120 0 .' .· ·. ·. •. '. · .. ,-.r ... I'~ . (EsMf ·. ,I"·· ... !Ii :0: . '" .: • . ( .,,1.,(\ 't:i-• .,. _;... J ~-· '""" ~-,:,;,. .... ! .. \1~J . . -ill .\ ' ... ·... ~ ... ·.. . , I .q .. '+Jry; \ c \. v··· / ~ .. ~ Tf' Cl. <. (/ "fl ., ~';l,J,, ~"' """' i 20.Ut cfsM.-J; ,,.,, J,;;1,13: """''"'' 12G. I( ([SM, R •\ (-fJ,.:r '\, ·= ' / ' ~;;~d°:. .·.... -~--' \ b e.•'-'<' •. 1"· . ·,.. ·-.. , . '~ :Q:illb.;; •. '\, -~ ·-~; 'M: ·B,·' ·~ ,2 5,.-.W.' 785.14'". N 88' 11 . 0 City of Renton Planrnng Division :1,1'; I ,_,i i. UJ /';..~· fr:> fs II \I fl (s" 'CJ 1fl1 .. ~---:1 ~ L~ U fl LS I.Y _."!,' 1 ·-1 " ,w SCALE· 1•=50'-0" "; J .c·.:i~ .. "" ;;.;:::w, 2 .• "'''"" .... ,. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ~ ,~~-" '"'""-'"'"'"'"'"" ~~ ,,~r~:::;,,, '''"' -'""'"""""'' '""""'"""' TREE CUTTING/ LAND CLEARING PLAN L2.2 = i ' ' ' I I i ' ~ ~ . ' ' ' g DD·, ~-i [ ~ ~ q :::- ! <( C 0 ... C (l) a: r,,;.-;=.·, 0 C: '>, - -C: 6 0:: • C 0 .::.;·,i_;· .~::.,·;== -=~ ' ii ' I ' ! H i i ' i ' i ' I I ' ! • ' i ' z ' ;~ -! ' « ' 'Ir ~ : ;l ! ! ~ I w I ~ ~ ---,=c-f--_:__:_:__:_ _______ J __________ Jt~1lJ ______ i_ __ ~'_J N '= I'.....: 1 _<:C C 0 ..... IC: : (l) tr: C 0 :@ > c """'"© ... "''"'"""'"' l ·----··' LO -..~ICT-CW•IL ,._,. d ~"'l~t~~:~ lDc: '"\ ~ ' -~ ~~,.,. '"~-[l[VATION @ R[[!\jNING .~Af~G) ·-~ r-=-r--...... ,_,,.,._,, -1 ~~J~ ~~urn-. '' 00 ~·~ .,,.~0[i I fCJJ O DI "-"'-' ,.,1.1<>1rn.,,...., ==--------------~[L[VATiONS@_CQMEOS~_/I_R_EAr:'\4 """""""' ,;,·-r-~'t~ ,,._.,. ~I ,,,.,,..,n" -,,.., ., .. m, -"''"""'"""- ----1-g,~ ,.-.:,"",.:.::1(1< ·~--_,.,.,.,. '"'""''"·'- -·~ ----<-----LLl--<----lf.! ~-.. • SECTION -BUS CANOPY CD · -----·11r r-----1(-f ------f ~fl--~ ·-"--------l ""ll!"!O<""' ff--"-~---11 'JL ~i ___ ____j ""'"n'"""' ,,.,. ......... ,., .. 1 --, ., ~I ~.:;. ~ fl <1)00 IC<>"'<U"""' [l[VATIONS@ DUMPSTER ENCLOSURl~·I ,,..., .. \_::> ,,_,,. --,_ I •"-!, rr_· -~ ' Il !-- ~ ! ~~-I =~,'If::~,-:;,; ~ -· .,.,,,,. ,.-.~,""-~~ ~ ''"'"''""' ''"""""·'•· fLEVATIONS @ COMPOST COflTAIN[R ENCLO,;~~~(i': ---j~---- ."---/ ::.~~~""'"~"'"" __ J _____ ._ .. ,,. ~-:~Tr -T~I II i I I_ . . l ,1 SITE DETAILS & ELEVATIONS _ __ _ __ [L[VATION -BUS CANOPY(-'\ ________ _ C1tyof Renton ~, , .... _'__; I A f:11 Plcrnning Division i 1. ! ... [Rl[~ (C; ~ ~\)# [E [Q) ---1 I ~·-;;;,· ' .. '" 'j I ' '-' s" ~L....J C: z 0 ~ -.,F-----1~~·===~ ---·-------· ,Ji I ) /_ /" , er ' '-.::::::_:_-_:,..._:_-- ~ z z :s IL (!) z -. I- I (!) ~[~ !::!, <Im ·"'.-:.,_ ----'.,o:-~7'"""" __ ;::: •. ~, C: C 0 0 ~ ·-~ en 2 ~ -er: ~ ©) [illJJ ~ = ;:, GM c__'i) = ;1d1I] ·5-p l'c!.S ~ J (/J !i~l ~1 ~ ___ , ____ J~_~_;_ .. ~J_ ~-------- -. =Jl --t:J ----~ ' ,c=:, '~ t;i~ --+-- C: C 0 0 --if; '-· > a., cc C -o; 0 >, ---~ 8 (.) Q._ ·, IQ) ruui ~ = 11Jlll t?) .. ,U] n ~ •Qr =co I ~. ; ,. 0 i2. Ii 0 n' I il1jt e 'I • ii = a C I•; I ; : ""' 1r s =, ti : H -, i: I li I ~ (.) ....... =i~!i l . • ~t~:1 t ! ! I );@ ! l':i ~ 1h 1h ti g 1~11 I$ ;;: ! u u ;gil i I I ~1 •• ; I ;:1; i ~ i fg ~ii~ I ; ; ; ~ ·. ~. f o I~ -... -.. _,1_1_11_·11_t ___ Je_:_~~ ____ l1_:1 _i-+--11 ____ q __ 3 --+--~ I t' ~ ' I I I \ \ ' \. " / ,I ; -. , . . ~-~ . -~-• UI ...... "" / ... N 0 .ri u ... .. ,---' ( . -- f-~ --· -. ·51 L __ ._ ... •• Denis Law r City of • -----~M:a:y:or ____ ............ ... .J,~JJWJJ March 26, 2012 Brad Medrud, AICP AHBL, lne, 2215 N 30'h Street #300 Tacoma, WA 98403 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator SUBJECT: LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPROVEMENTS, REQUEST FOR MINOR MODIFICATION OF APPROVED SITE PLAN {FILE NO. LUAll-012, SA-A) Dear Mr. Medrud: I am in receipt of your letter and attachments dated February 22, 2012 wherein you request revisions to the approved Site Plan for the following changes: 1. Relocate garbage enclosures at north staff parking lot and at the gym. 2. Provide landscape island, repave, and rest ripe parking stalls in the north staff parking lot. 3. Provide additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility, repave existing facility, and re-stripe the visitor and staff parking (this item was originally in Phase 1 and has been moved to Phase 2). The parking lot would change from a total of 43 spaces to 42 spaces, as a result of an increase in ADA stalls from 4 to 6. 4. Located lighted bollard in front of the sky-bridge to keep vehicles from driving through (this items was originally in Phase 1 and has been moved to Phase 2). 5. Provide a new left existing turn lane along existing exit turn lane. (this item was originally in Phase 1 and has been moved to Phase 2). 6. Complete work on relocation of the bus drop off and pick up to separate bus and car traffic. 7. Build a covered pedestrian waiting structure and covered walkway. 8. The applicant is no longer proposing to repave and restripe the existing 213 stall student parking lot, including the associated landscape improvements. As such the total stalls would remain at 213 instead of be reduced to 207 per the previously approved site plan. 9. Stormwater modifications including more porous concrete to mitigate for stormwater runoff BM P's, reducing the size of the rain garden in accordance with the increased porous paving, and reducing the scope for the existing southern parking lot from a complete renovation to adding curb islands for traffic control and replacing the existing conveyance storm system with a new storm conveyance system. Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Brad Medrud Page 2 of 4 March 26, 2012 • The majority of the proposed modifications to the previously approved site plan relate to phasing changes, with a few exceptions. The only actual project changes are to the overall site plan is the new location of the garbage enclosures, the reduction in scope for the student parking lot, and stormwater modifications Renton Municipal Code Section 4-9-2001, allows minor adjustments to an approved site plan, provided: 1. The adjustment does not involve more than a ten percent {10%} increase in area or scale of the development in the approved site plan; or 2. The adjustment does not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities than the approved plan; or 3. The adjustment does not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan. Analysis of Request The site plan modification requested and as shown in your February 27, 2012 submittals have been compared to the Site Plan as approved by the Planning Director on April 27, 2011. Overall, the Site Plan Modifications reduce the scope of the project by eliminating the construction proposed for the student parking lot. However, the modifications result in an increase in the parking count from 344 stalls to 346 stalls. Based on the · approved site plan the existing site exceeded the maximum parking count by 110 spaces. In the original review staff made a finding that the proposed project did not result in an increase of parking provided at the site and therefore recommended approval of the 344 parking stalls. However, the proposed modification would result in an increase of parking at the subject site. As such, staff recommends a condition of approval that the applicant provide an updated site plan (Sheet Al.00) with two less parking stalls maintaining the approved modification in the original site plan approval of 344 parking spaces. The refuse and recycling facilities are proposed to be relocated to the north parking lot and a new location near the gym. The applicant has proposed to screen the north parking lot facility with chain link fence with privacy slats and landscaping on the west and south side. The gym facility is proposed to be screened with a combination of chain link fence with privacy slats and a concrete wall. All fencing and walls are proposed to be 6 feet in height with a gate opening of at least 14-feet. The new landscaping plan appears to comply with the landscaping standards for parking lot perimeter landscaping. A final landscape plan would be required to be submitted at Construction/Building Permit application for Phase 2. Brad Medrud Page 3 of 4 March 26, 2012 The modifications proposed to the stormwater plan appear to be compliant with the 2009 KCSWDM. To ensure compliance with the 2009 KCSWDM staff recommends as a condition of approval that all changes be shown on the civil plans for Phase 2 which shall be submitted for detailed review and approval by the Plan Review Project Manager. If the conditions of approval are met, the proposed changes would not result in more than a 10 percent increase in area or scale of the development as building area would not increase and impervious coverage would only increase minimally. The proposal would not have a greater impact on facilities, nor would it change the boundaries of the original approved site plan. The project site is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre with a land use designation of Residential Single Family. All applicable setbacks, lot coverage, and landscaping standards would be achieved if the conditions of approval are met. Decision Based on staff's analysis, I have determined the proposed revisions are within the parameters defined by the Renton Municipal Code. Therefore, the proposed modification to the site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide an updated site plan (Sheet Al.00) with two less parking stall maintaining the approved modification in the original site plan approval of 344 parking spaces. The reduction in parking stalls shall be incorporated into landscaping, adjacent to a proposed parking lot perimeter landscaping area. The updated site plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to construction permit issuances. 2. All changes to the stormwater plan shall be shown on the civil plans for Phase 2 which shall be submitted for detailed review and approval by the Plan Review Project Manager. 3. The applicant is advised that all code requirements and conditions of the site plan approval are still applicable to the development of the site. The applicant should also understand that Environmental SEPA Review and Site Plan Review may be required for future modifications to the site plan. Brad Medrud Page 4 of 4 March 26, 2012 This determination will be final unless a written appeal of this administrative determination -accompanied by the required filing fee -is filed with the City's Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the date of this decision. Should you have any questions regarding this determination or the requirements discussed in this letter, please contact Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner, at (425) 430-7314. Sincerely, C.<c.0:_ sj C. E. "Chip" Vincent Planning Director cc: LUAll-012, SA-A Jennifer Henning -Current Planning Manager Vanessa Dolbee -Senior Planner Arneta Henninger -Plan Reviewer Parties of Record Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Arneta J. Henninger Thursday, March 22, 2012 1 :09 PM Vanessa Dolbee LINDBERGH LUA 11-012 Follow up Flagged The Site Plan Modification is approved on the condition that all changes be shown on the civil plans and will be submitted for a detailed review. Thank you! Arneta Henninger City of Renton 425-430-7298 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: February 29, 2012 TO: FROM: Arn eta Henninger, Plan Review ':{) Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner · SUBJECT: LUAll-012 Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements The project applicant has submitted for a Minor Site Plan modification for the previously approved Lindbergh High School Site Improvements project. The applicant has currently applied for and received permits for Phase 1 of their proposal; however these construction permits have not been completed. Before the applicant begins Phase 2, they have requested the following modification to the scope of the project: Phase 2 has been amended to include the following: • Relocate garbage enclosures at north staff parking lot and at gym. • Provided Landscape Island, repave, and restripe parking stalls in the north staff parking lot. • Provided additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility, repave existing facility, and re-stripe the visitor and staff parking (this item was originally in Phase 1 and has been moved to Phase 2). • Located lighted bollard in front of the sky-bridge to keep vehicles from driving through (this items was originally in Phase 1 and has been moved to Phase 2). • Provide a new left existing turn lane along existing exit turn lane. (this item was originally in Phase 1 and has been moved to Phase 2). • Complete work on relocation of the bus drop off and pick up to separate bus and car traffic. • Build a covered pedestrian waiting structure and covered walkway. The applicant is no longer proposing to repave and restripe the existing 210 stall student parking lot, including the associated landscape improvements. Additional changes are proposed for stromwater treatment, please find attached a letter from Coughin Porter Lundeen explain these changes, in addition to other pertinent submittal items. Please provide comments to Vanessa Dolbee, on the subject modification by March 14, 2012. h:\ccd\planning\current planning\projects\2011 projects\11-012. vanessa\modification _ memo to plan review.doc PR ECT INFORMATION (conti1 d) City of Renton City of Renton FEB 2 7 lUll LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Renton School District No. 403 Rick Stracke -Executive Director Facilities & Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements NAME: Operations 2012 Minor Modification to the 2011 Site Plan Review Approval (File Number: LUA11-012, SA-A) ADDRESS: 7812 South 124'" Street PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 16426128'" Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98178-4830 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 204-4403 282305-9004-03, 282305-9042-07, 282305-9093-05 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Same as Property Owner EXISTING LAND USE(S): High School PROPOSED LAND USE(S): COMPANY (if applicable): High School EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: Residential Single Family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ZIP: (if applicable): Not Applicable EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: R-8 CONT ACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Not Applicable SITE AREA (in square feet): 37.25 Acres (Total Site Area)/ NAME: Brad Medrud, AICP 5.37 Acres (Work Area) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (if applicable): AHBL, Inc. DEDICATED: Not Applicable. ADDRESS: 2215 North 30'" Street, Suite 300 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: Not Applicable. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Tacoma ZIP: 98403 ACRE (if applicable): Not Applicable ..-.... . - PR ECT INFORMAT ION (conti1 d) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) (253) 383-2422 / bmedrud@ahbl.com Not Applicable NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): Not Applicable NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $3,000,000 Not Applicable SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS (if applicable): Not Applicable ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): Not Applicable D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): None D FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. fl. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 228,972 SF D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. fl. NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. applicable): Not Applicable -No Change in Existing Building Area) D SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): No Change in the Number of D WETLANDS 9 772 sq. ft. Existing Employees LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 28 , TOWNSHIP 23N . RANGE 05E IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Minor Modification to the 2011 Site Plan Review 3. A1mroval (File Number: LUA11-012, SA-A 4. 2. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ ________ P_R ECT INFORMATION (conti1 d_) _______ _ I AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I I, (Print Name/s) Brad Medrud . declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one)_ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _X_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature of Owner/Representative) Parcel A: D"~) (l,,,.lr, j I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that : t'"~v le ~ · ..... ( signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) ___ L"-+=C={_,~J_D_e_l_/ ___ -l,I My appointment expires: _S_-+/~/~S'-'l~l_~u_/~y~-- Legal Description: THE EAST 500 FEET OF THE NORTH 1121 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel B: THE EASTERLY 330 FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY 216.47 FEET, MORE OR LESS, OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel C: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; LESS THE EAST 500 FEET OF THE NORTH 1121 FEET; LESS THE EAST 330 FEET OF THE SOUTH 216.47 FEET; LESS THE SOUTH 250 FEET OF THE EAST 523 FEET OF THE WEST 553 FEET; AND, LESS COUNTY ROADS Printed: 02-27-2012 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA11-012 Receipt Number: R1200862 Total Payment: 02/27/2012 04:18 PM 100.00 Payee: Renton SD, P.O. 2011000110 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees 100.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment PO 20110001 100 .oo Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers 5008 ooo.000000.007.345 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 ooo.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review 5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat 5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD 5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks 5017 ooo.000000.007.345 Rezone 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 5021 ooo.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 ooo.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 ROJECT MEMO TO: Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton City of Renton Planning Division FROM: DATE: Community and Economic Development Renton City Hall -6'" Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057-3232 Brad Medrud, AICP February 22, 2012 FEB 2 7 1011 PROJECT: Renton School District -Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements 2012 Minor Modification to 2011 SPR Approval (File Number: LUAll-012, SA-A) OUR FILE NO.: 210299.30, Task 35 SUBJECT: Project Narrative for Site Plan Review As revised by the 2012 Minor Modification to the 2011 Site Plan Review Approval The following is the original Project Narrative provided for the project dated March 8, 2011 showing the edits reflecting the changes to the project proposed by our 2012 Minor Modification request. The edits are shown stFil\iR!I e~t old text and underlining new text. 1. Project name, size and location of site Project Name: Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements Site Location: 16426 -128'" Avenue SE, Renton WA Parcel Numbers: 282305-9004, 282305-9042 and 282305-9093 Project Size: 37.25 Acres (Total Site Area)/ 5.37 Acres (Work Area) 2. Land use permits required for proposed project • SEPA Review and Determination _• _Site Plan Review • 2012 Minor Modification to 2011 Site Plan Review Approval Renton School District No. 403 ( completed) City of Renton (completed) City of Renton 3. Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties The City of Renton zoning designation of the project site is R-8. Adjacent Properties: • West -City of Renton: R-8 Page 1 of6 mmmm 3!1uct,.,,·,_1 1 !_n~,,,neers TACOMA 2115 North 311' Street Suite300 Ta coma, WA 98403-3350 153.383.1411 ,_ 15J.383.1571 r . , SEATTLE 1200 6t. Avenue Suite 1610 Seattle, WA 98101-3117 106167.1415 , 106.167.2429 - SPO!<ANE 827 West First Avenue Suitelll Spokone,Wl 99201-3912 509.151-5019 'le 509.315.8862 www.ahbl.com • East -King County: R-6 • North -King County: R-6 • South -City of Renton: R-8 and Resource Conservation 4. Current use of the site and any existing improvements Lindbergh High School is the current and proposed use of the site. Existing Site Improvements: High School buildings, portable classrooms, parking areas, drive lanes, playfields, and running track 5. Special site features {i.e. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes) Based on information derived through site reconnaissance and readily available documents in the Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report prepared by AHBL, Inc., revised February 2011, four category 3 wetland areas were identified on southern portion the school site. The four category 3 wetlands are the following sizes: • Wetland A -5,440 SF (on-site)/ 9,000 SF (total) • Wetland B -1,165 SF • Wetland C -1,399 SF • Wetland D -1,768 SF (on-site)/ Greater than 1 acre (total) In addition to the four identified wetlands, a constructed ditch designed and built as a stormwater facility was identified in the northwest portion of the site. The steepest slope on the site is approximately 34 percent, located between the softball and baseball fields on the west side of the property. 6. Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions The Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington, as depicted by the Web Soil Survey, was reviewed to determine the general nature of soils on the subject site. The site was determined to contain Alderwood and Everett soils. In addition, Associated Earth Sciences prepared a Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated February 10, 2010, that provides more information on the soils on the site. Coughlin Porter Lundeen prepared a storm drainage plan in accordance with the City of Renton requirements. Storm water runoff will be collected in existing and new catch basins, open water systems, downspouts, and area drains and conveyed to new water quality and run-off control facilities. The treated runoff will discharge to the existing downstream system. 7. Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development The existing use is a high school and is to remain unchanged. The site lighting will be replaced and updated, except there will not be any changes to the lighting on the existing fields. There will be no changes to the existing school beyond what is listed below and there will not be an increase in students or staff based on this work. Project Memo Page 2 of 6 Project Narrative for Site Plan Review As revised by the 2012 Minor Modification to the 2011 Site Plan Review Approval 210299.30, Task 35 February 22, 2012 mmm11 The proposed project will include the following work in two phases: Phase 1: ---Bus Drop Off to South Parking Lot Lawer ParkiA§ Let aAd Bus Relocate bus drop off and pick up to South Parking Lot except for special needs buses, maiAtaiA emer!'jeAEY vel'1ide ~atl'1way, aAel leeate li!'jl'1ted eel lard iA FFeAt ef slfy' srid!'je te kee~ vel'1ides FFSA9 driviA§ tAFeU!'JA., • Faet:ilty PaflciA(i Let P1 s oi~e aBSitisAal F'Sfldn~ aSjaeeflt ta eHistili§ ~a1 l:iA§ faeilit,, re19a • e @Histifl§ faeilipt BAS I@ st1 i~e. ---New East Side Parking and Emergency Vehicle Access -Provide additional faculty parking on east side of school and enhance accessibility. Provide emergency vehicle access to east side of school and enhance building security. • t1ai1. Sel Hrnl Site Er=1ti; tJsFtR Pr s .i€1e fl!@.: left e::itiA§ teJI n lafle al@l=l§ e;cistin§ @ltit t1::Jrn laA@. Phase 1 was substantially completed in 2011. PAase 1 ef tl'1e ~re~esea 13rejeet will start iA JuAe 2911 witl'1 eem13letieA seAeelulea fer t1'1e eAd ef Oeteser 2911. Phase 2: • Garbage Enclosures -Relocate garbage enclosures at North Staff Parking Lot and at GymeA west side ef tl'1e suileliA§. • North Staff Parking Lot: Provide landscape island. repave, and restripe parking stalls. • Visitor and StaffFaculty Parking Lot Provide additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility. repave existing facility. and re-stripe. Locate lighted bollard in front of sky-bridge to keep vehicles from driving through. • Maio School Site Entry North Provide new left exiting turn lane along existing exit turn lane. • SeutA-Student Parking Lot -Complete work on rRelocation ofe bus drop off and pick up-1Q separate bus and car traffic., ~uild a covered pedestrian waiting structure and covered walkway access, aAs re~ave t1'1e e>~istiA§ 219 stall 13arlciA§ let aAel restri~e. Phase 2 will start in June 2012 and be completed by October 2012. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of existing school district facilities. 8. For plats indicate the proposed number, net density and range of sizes (net lot area) of the new lots Not applicable to this application. 9, Access The high school is accessed currently by three entrances from 128th Avenue SE along the west side of the property. The existing northern site entrance will remain in the same location, but will be modified to include a left hand turn lane. The other two accesses will remain unchanged. 10. Proposed off-site improvements (i.e. installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.) No off-site improvements are proposed. Project Memo Page 3 of 6 Project Narrative for Site Plan Review As revised by the 2012 Minor Modification to the 2011 Site Plan Review Approval 210299.30, Task 35 February 22, 2012 mmmm 11. Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project Total estimated construction cost for the proposed project is $3,000,000 The fair market values for both are assumed equal to the estimated construction costs. Project Memo Page 4 of 6 Project Narrative for Site Plan Review As revised by the 2012 Minor Modification to the 2011 Site Plan Review Approval 210299.30, Task 35 February 22, 2012 mmmo 12. Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed There will be approximately 30,000 cubic yards of cut and approximately 15,000 cubic yards of fill anticipated on the project site. Fill will be sourced locally from an approved quarry, but the project contractor will determine specific location. 13. Number, type and size of any trees to be removed Some existing trees, shrubs and other landscaping will be removed as part of the proposed project improvements. The number, type and size are shown on our landscaping plans. We will be providing more landscaping as part of this project than would be required by the code. The trees in the knoll in the center of the current bus and student drop off will be removed to address the following safety concerns of the School District and the school principal: • School officials need to be able to monitor the pickup and drop off area activity. Currently the knoll blocks sight lines across the pickup and drop off area. • School officials need be able to see the primary entrances to the gymnasium from the main school building. Currently it is not possible to see the entrances to the gymnasium from the main entry. • Currently parking along the pickup and drop off area needs to use the main travel way to enter and exit stalls. This creates a safety hazard for those cars, as well as those cars and buses that are picking up students. The new parking arrangement will separate the parking from the access way. 14. Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City No land will be dedicated to the City. 15. Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes There will be up to two temporary job shacks on the site. 16. Any proposed modifications being requested (include written justification) No modifications are proposed. Project Memo Page S of 6 Project Narrative for Site Plan Review As revised by the 2012 Minor Modification to the 2011 Site Plan Review Approval 210299.30, Task 35 February 22, 2012 mmmm 17. For projects located within 100 feet of a stream or wetland, please include, distance in feet from the wetland or stream to the nearest area of work Proposed work on the south parking lot (Phase 2) will be within 200 feet of Wetland A, but outside of the wetland and its Category 3 associated buffer of 25 feet. 18. For projects located within 200-feet of Black River, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, May Creek and Lake Washington please include the following additional information: Distance from closest area of work to the ordinary high water mark. Not applicable to this application. Description of the nature of the existing shoreline Not applicable to this application. The approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view in the event the proposed project exceeds a height of 35-feet above the average grade level Not applicable to this application. c: Calvin Gasaway, Green-Gasaway Architects Tom Marshall, McGranahan Architects Q: \2010\210299\30 ]LN\Deliverables_ By _Date\SPR Modification 2012\20152015 _ ReVlsed_Project_Narrative_Memo _for _2012_SPR_ Minor Modlflcatlon_210299_30.docx Project Memo Page 6 of 6 Project Narrative for Site Plan Review As revised by the 2012 Minor Modification to the 2011 Site Plan Review Approval 210299.30, Task 35 February 22, 2012 mmmo TO: FROM: DATE: Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton tOJECT MEMO Community and Economic Development Renton City Hall -5th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057-3232 Brad Medrud, AICP February 22, 2012 City of Renton Planning Division FEB 2 7 1011 PROJECT: Renton School District -Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements 2012 Minor Modification to 2011 SPR Approval OUR FILE NO.: 210299.30, Task 35 SUBJECT: 2012 Minor Modification to 2011 Site Plan Review Approval (File Number: LUAll-012, SA-A) Amended SPR Project Phasing Memo 1. Project name and location of site Project Name: Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements Site Location: 16426 -128'h Avenue SE, Renton WA Parcel Numbers: 282305-9004, 282305-9042, and 282305-9093 2. Proposed Phasing of Project Please refer to the attached Site Plan, Sheet Al.00, dated February 15, 2012, for the site plan showing the Phase 2 work. Phase 2 of the proposed project will start June 2012 and be completed by October 2012. The project will include the following work in two phases: Phase 1: • Bus Drop Off to South Parking Lot -Relocate bus drop off and pick up to South Parking Lot except for special needs buses. • New East Side Parking and Emergency Vehicle Access -Provide additional faculty parking on east side of school and enhance accessibility. Provide emergency vehicle access to east side of school and enhance building security. Phase 1 was substantially completed in 2011. Phase 2: • Garbage Enclosures -Relocate garbage enclosures at North Staff Parking Lot and at Gym. • North Staff Parking Lot: Provide landscape island, repave, and restripe parking stalls. • Visitor and Staff Parking Lot -Provide additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility, Page 1 of 2 I I~_ i ano·s._:apP /1•-c;h;/ects i'•J:=itu:ai RAsou,ce E:~o/og1sts TACOMA 2215 North 30" Street 5uite300 Tacoma, WA 98403-3350 253.383.2422 -r 253.383.2572 • , • SEATTLE 1200 611 Avenue Suite 1620 Seattle, WA 9BIOl-31 I 7 206.26/.2425 'c 206.267.2429 •X Sf-'OKANE B27 Wes1 First Avenue Suite 301 lpokone, WA 99201-3912 509.252.5019 lie 509.315.8162 '· · www.ahbl.com repave existing facility, and re-stripe. Locate lighted bollard in front of sky-bridge to keep vehicles from driving through. • Main School Site Entry North -Provide new left exiting turn lane along existing exit turn lane. • Student Parking Lot -Complete work on relocation of bus drop off and pick up to separate bus and car traffic. Build a covered pedestrian waiting structure and covered walkway access. Phase 2 will start in June 2012 and be completed by October 2012. The site lighting will be replaced and updated as work proceeds through both phases, except there will not be any changes to the lighting on the existing fields. c: Calvin Gasaway, Greene-Gasaway Architects Tom Marshall, McGranahan Architects Q: \20 10\210299\30 _ PLN\Deliverables _ By_Date\SPR Modification 2012\20120222_2012_SPR_ Project_Phasing_ Memo.docx Project Memo 2012 Minor Modification to 2011 Site Plan Review Approval Amended SPR Project Phasing Memo 210299.30, Task 35 February 22, 2012 Page 2 of 2 mmmo n Department of Community & Economic D _ pment City of, ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-012, SA-A APPLICANT: Rick Stracke -Renton School District #403 PROJECT TITLE: Lindbergh High School Site Improvements PROJECT REVIEWER: Arn eta Henninger SITE AREA: 37.25 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 228,972 square feet LOCATION: 16426128th Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the re-design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop off and pick up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency vehicle access. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of the existing school facilities. No changes are proposed to the existing buildings and/or sports fields located on site. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre and is approximately 37.25 acres in size. However, the area of work is limited to 5.37 acres of the 37.25 acre site. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and contains four category 3 wetlands. The applicant has proposed to retain 511 of the 577 trees on site. A wetland and habitat report and a Technical Information Report were submitted with the application. The subject proposal required SEPA Environmental Review; the School District was the lead agency for this review and issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated with 12 mitigation measures. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Eorth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Unht!G/ore Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services ,_/ Energw Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport. Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where odditionol ~;:~ to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: June 15, 2011 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. • _.,. ~=-'·"''-',.C'-'<""-""'-.C-'"--•~ ,,,,,,,..._........._,,..,.-.-.,---.•w.d',.,..•_, . ...,.,..,.._,_,,._ . -·---~-----~~-~=~-._-.:. -""• -•'--'•••...._.,_,,., -Project Name: LUA (file) Number: Lindbergh High School Site Improvements LUA-11-012, SA-A Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee Acceptance Date: March 21, 2011 Applicant: Rick Stracke, Renton School District #403 , Owner: Same as applicant l Contact: Brad Medrud, AHBL, Inc. 1--------------------------------------, _ PID Number: 2823059004; 2823059042; 2823059093 1-------------------------------------! l ERC Decision Date: ' ERC Appeal Date: 1 Administrative Approval: Appeal Period Ends: , Public Hearing Date: : Date Appealed to HEX: , By Whom: _, HEX Decision: -Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Mylar Recording Number: April 27, 2011 May 9, 2011 Date: Date: Project Description: Application requesting Administrative Site Plan approval for the re-design of ! the Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop-off; and pick-up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency ' vehicle access. Location· 16426 128'h Avenue SE Co_m_m_e_"_~_s=-----------------------------j Lindbergh High School S nprovements Conditions of Devel 1ent (Summary) LUA11-012 Project Condition Source of When Party Notes Condition Compliance is Responsible Required As per the City of Renton Code, a ERC Building Applicant/ Construction Stormwater Pollution Permit Contractor Prevention Plan (CSWPPP) and Application Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation and During Control Plan (TESC) will be submitted Project to the City for review and Construction implemented during the construction Phase 1 & 2 phases. Mitigation measures, including Best ERC During Project Applicant/ Management Practices, will be Construction Contractor implemented in accordance with Phase 1 & 2 theses plans before and during construction. In addition, all work will be ERC During Project Applicant/ implemented consistent with the Construction Contractor recommendation of the "Geologic Phase 1 & 2 Hazard and Preliminary and Geotechnical Engineering Report" prepared by Associated Earth Sciences in February 2010. The applicant will water the ground as ERC During Project Applicant/ needed before and during the Construction Contractor construct.ion phases, including clearing Phase 1 & 2 and grading activities, to control dust particles. Construction vehicles are expected to ERC During Project Applicant/ be equipped with factory-installed Construction Contractor mufflers and spark arrestors that will Phase 1 & 2 control excessive emissions Materials stored on site (e.g. soil, ERC During Project Applicant/ fertilizer, and pesticides) will be Construction Contractor enclosed and/or covered when not in Phase 1 & 2 use. The applicant will employ best management practices in the use and storage of these materials consistent with all applicable regulations. As noted above, during construction ERC During Project Applicant/ phases, best management practices Construction Contractor indentified in the TESC and CSWPPP Phase 1 & 2 will be implemented. Updated: 05/25/11 Page 1 of 5 Lindbergh High School Si nprovements Conditions of Devel 1ent (Summary) LUA 11-012 Stormwater design required as a part ERC Building Applicant/ of site improvements will be based on Permit Contractor the requirements of the City of Application Renton's 2009 King County Surface and During Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), as Project amended by King County or the City of Construction Renton. Phase 1 & 2 Noise impacts associated with ERC During Project Applicant/ construction phases of the project will Construction Contractor be limited in duration consistent with Phase 1 & 2 the City of Renton's noise regulations. To mitigate general noise impacts ERC During Project Applicant/ during the construction phases, Construction Contractor measures such as using and regularly Phase 1 & 2 maintaining efficient mufflers and quieting devices on all construction equipment and vehicles will be taken. The School District's traffic engineering ERC Prior to Applicant Completed consultant will conduct a sight Building distance analysis for both left turns Permit and right turns exiting the north entry, Approval which is the proposed new existing left Phase 2 turn lane alongside the exiting left turn lane at the north site entry. If culturally significant objects are ERC During Project Applicant/ found during site preparation work, Construction Contractor the Washington State Office of Phase 1 & 2 Archaeology and Historic Preservation will be notified, and appropriate measures will be taken. Updated: 05/25/11 Page 2 of 5 Lindbergh High School Si nprovements Conditions of Devel 1ent (Summary) LUA 11-012 Thirty percent (30%) of the trees shall Code During Project Applicant/ The approved Tree be retained in a residential or Construction Contractor Retention Plan Identified institutional development Phase 1 & 2 the removal of 66 trees. Phase 1-Building Permit Plans identified the removal of an additional 19 trees that were to be saved and the preservation of 2 trees identified for removal. Resulting in 83 trees to be removed. The additional trees to be removed maintain compliance with the 30% retention standards. Removal of additional trees in Phase 2 should be evaluated based on the additional 17 trees removed in Phase 1. Temporary construction fencing shall Site Plan During Project Applicant/ be placed around the west side of Construction Contractor Wetland A along the 25-foot buffer. Phase 1 & 2 This fencing shall be installed prior to the beginning of construction on Phase 2 of the project and shall remain in place until project completion. The applicant shall submit a detailed Site Plan Prior to Applicant landscape plan and irrigation plan that Building complies with the requirements of Permit RMC 4-8-120 and provides for street Approval. trees behind the sidewalk. The detailed landscape plan shall be Phase 1-per submitted and approved by the May 18, 2011 Current Planning Project Manager Memo from prior to Building Permit approval. AHBL Phase 2-per May 18, 2011 Memo from AHBL Updated: 05125111 Page 3 of 5 Lindbergh High School Si nprovements Conditions of Devel ,ent (Summary) LUA 11-012 Bicycle parking shall be provided in compliance with RMC 4-4-080F.ll.a. A new site plan shall be submitted at building permit review that depicts the location, dimensions, and type of bicycle parking facilities to be developed, the proposed bicycle parking plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance. A 6-foot tall screening fence with at least a 12-foot wide opening shall be provided on the north side of the new refuse and recycling facility. A detail of the proposed screening fence shall be submitted for approval by the Current Planning Project Manager, prior to building permit issuance. Shared roadway signage shall be installed per the City of Renton Transportation Department standards. Shared roadway signage locations and installation shall be shown in the building permit plan set and specifications shall be approved by the City of Renton Transportation Department. Site Plan Site Plan Site Plan RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul Code hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. Commercial, multi-family, new single Code family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Updated: 05125/11 Prior to Building Permit Approval Phase 1 Prior to Building Permit Approval Phase 1 Prior to Building Permit Approval Phase 1 During Project Construction Phase 1 & 2 During Project Construction Phase 1 & 2 Applicant Applicant Applicant Applicant/ Contractor Applicant/ Contractor Page 4 of 5 Lindbergh High School Si nprovements Conditions of Devel 1ent (Summary) LUA 11-012 Within thirty (30) days of completion Code of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety {90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. The applicant may not fill, excavate, Code stack or store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. The applicant shall erect and maintain Code six foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (SO') indicating the words, "NO TRESPASSING -Protected Trees" or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (50'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. Updated: 05/25/11 During Project Construction Phase 1 & 2 Applicant/ Contractor During Project Applicant/ Construction Phase 1 & 2 During Project Construction Phase 1 & 2 Contractor Applicant/ Contractor Page 5 of 5 DEPARTMENT OF COMI\ ITV . City of , . ·. .·· ~2;,_ -----~-J ·':cs Il [ CJ I J ~ AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST REPORT DA TE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: April 27, 2011 Lindbergh High School Site Improvements Renton School District No. 403, 7812 South 124th Street, Seattle, WA 98178 Rick Stracke -Executive Director Facilities & Operations, 7812 Sout_h 124th Street, Seattle, WA 98178 Brad Medrud, AICP, AHBL, Inc., 2215 North 30th Street, Suite 300, Tacoma, WA 98403 LUAll-012, SA-A Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the re- design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop-off and pick-up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency vehicle access. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality ofthe existing school facilities. No changes are proposed to the existing buildings and/or sports fields located on site. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre and is approximately 37 .25 acres in size. However, the area of work is limited to 5.37 acres ofthe 37.25 acre site. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and contains four category 3 wetlands. The applicant has proposed to retain 511 of the 577 trees on site. 16426 128th Avenue SE 228,972 SF 37.25 acres Total project area is 5.37 acres Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): None Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): None Total Building Area GSF: 228,972 Project Location Map Site Plan REPORT.doc DEPARTMENT OF COMI\._.JITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT , ··· City of ' ) r r ! ( ) .· ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST REPORT DATE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Areo: April 27, 2011 Lindbergh High School Site Improvements Renton School District No. 403, 7812 South 124th Street, Seattle, WA 98178 Rick Stracke -Executive Director Facilities & Operations, 7812 South 124th Street, Seattle, WA 98178 Brad Medrud, AICP, AHBL, Inc., 2215 North 30th Street, Suite 300, Tacoma, WA98403 LUAll-012, SA-A Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the re- design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop-off and pick-up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency vehicle access. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of the existing school facilities. No changes are proposed to the existing buildings and/or sports fields located on site. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre and is approximately 37.25 acres in size. However, the area of work is limited to 5.37 acres of the 37.25 acre site. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and contains four category 3 wetlands. The applicant has proposed to retain 511 of the 577 trees on site. 16426 1281h Avenue SE 228,972 SF 37.25 acres Total project area is 5.37 acres Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint}: None Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross}: None Total Building Area GSF: 228,972 Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communi .. " & Economic Development Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision LUA11-0l2, SA-A LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR1 IENTS Report of April 27, 2011 B. EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Exhibit 10 Exhibit 11 Exhibit 12 Exhibit 13 Exhibit 14 Exhibit 15 Exhibit 16 Exhibit 17 Site Plan REPORT.doc -------------- Project Location Map Staff Report Neighborhood Map Conceptual Grading Plan, Sheet c3.01 Conceptual Drainage Control Plan, Sheet c4.01 Conceptual Drainage Control Plan, Sheet c4.06 Site Overview Plan, Sheet Ll.O Schematic Landscape Plan, Sheet Ll.1 Schematic Landscape Plan, Sheet Ll.2 Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan, Sheet L2.1 Three Cutting/Land Clearing Plan, Sheet L2,2 Site Plan, Sheet Al.01 Site Plan, Sheet Al.02 Site Details & Elevations, Sheet Al.11 Site Lighting Plan -New, Sheet El.02 Page 2 of 23 Engineering Report, TIR, Coughlin Porter Lundeen -dated 02/25/2011 Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report, AHBL -dated September 2010/Revised February 2011 Technical Memorandum, Heffron Transportation, Inc. -dated 02/24/2011 City of Renton Department of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR< E-:;,;N,;,,;T.;;.S ___ --~------ Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision WAll-012, SA-A Report of April 27, 2011 Page 3 of 23 @=GENERA~ INFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: Renton School District No. 403, 7812 South 124th Street, Seattle, WA 98178 2. Zoning Designation: Residential 8 dwelling units per net acre (R-8) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family (RSF) 4. Existing Site Use: Lindbergh High School, Renton School District 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: Single family residential {King County R-6} b. East: c. South: d. West: Single family residential {King County R-6) A church, single family residential, and Renton Park Elementary (R-8 zone) and Forested land {RC zone) Single family residential (R-8 zone) 6. Proposed Orientation: 7. Access: 8. Site Area: I D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Comprehensive Plan Zoning Annexation Variance for 70' field lights I E. PROJECT NARRATIVE: Land Use File No. N/A N/A N/A LUA09-037 Via 1281h Avenue SE at three locations Total: 37.25 acres. Area impacted: 5.37 acres Ordinance No. Date 5099 11/01/04 5349 02/26/2008 5327 03/1/2008 N/A 04/24/2009 The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review for re-design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF} land use designation and is zoned Residential 8 dwelling units per net acre (R-8) and located at 16426 1281h Avenue SE. The existing high school is comprised of three parcels (2823059004, 2823059042, and 2823059093) equaling 37.25 acres; however the area of impact by the proposed development would be limited to 5.37 acres of the overall site. In the R-8 zone, existing K-12 educational institutions are permitted. However, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit is required when changes in facilities exceed 10% of the development's gross floor area. Based on the provided site plan the changes would not exceed the 10% threshold to trigger a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. The proposed renovations would not expand the uses at the subject site or change the way the site is being used today. Site Pion REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHD_Ol SITE IMPRI cc'ENaeTc;;S __ -~--~~---- Report of April 27, 2011 Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision WA11_-_0_1ZL SA-A Page 4 of 23 The three parcels that make up Lindbergh High School are bordered by King County on the north and east and City of Renton to the south and west. The majority of the surrounding land uses are single- family residential homes, with the exception of a church, Renton Park Elementary, and an undeveloped parcel, all located to the south. The applicant has proposed a two phase development project. Phase one of the proposed project would start in June of 2011 with a completion schedule for the end of October. Phase two is expected to start in June of 2012 and be completed by October of 2012. Phase one and two would include the following work: Phase 1: • Lower Parking Lot (staff parking lot or north parking lot) and Bus -Relocate bus drop off and pick up to South Parking lot except for special needs buses, maintain emergency vehicle pathway, and locate lighted bollard in front of sky-bridge to keep vehicles from driving through. • Faculty Parking Lot -Provide additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility, repave existing facility and re-stripe. • New East Side Parking and Emergency Vehicle Access -Provide additional faculty parking on east side of the school and enhance accessibility. Provide emergency vehicle access to east side of school and enhance building security. • Main School Site Entry North -Provide new left exiting turn lane along existing exit turn lane. • Landscaping-Provided additional/new landscaping in and around the lower parking lot. Phase 2: • South Parking Lot (student parking lot) -Relocate bus drop off and pick up, build a covered pedestrian waiting structure and covered walkway access, and repave the existing 210-stall parking lot and restripe. • landscaping -Provided additional/new landscaping in and around the south parking lot. The Renton School District was the lead agency that conducted Environmental Review, SEPA, for the proposed improvements. The School District issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated on March 17, 2011 with 12 mitigation measures that addressed earth, air, water, noise, transportation, and historic and cultural preservation. The site is located in a seismic hazard area and contains four wetlands, in addition Molasses Creek is located to the east of the subject site approximately 300-feet away from the property line. The applicant submitted a Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report, prepared by AHBL, dated September 2010. This report identifies the four wetlands on the subject site to be Palustrine scrub-shrub/emergent, seasonally flooded Category 3 wetlands. Category 3 wetlands require a 25- foot buffer. The proposed project does not impact any of the four wetlands or their buffers. Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR< ;;,;EN,;.;T.;,;;;S ___ ~--~----- Report of April 27, 2011 Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision LUAll-012, SA-A Page 5 of 23 The applicant also submitted a Technical Information Report (TIR) prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen, dated February 25, 2011. Pursuant to the TIR, under current conditions the subject site contains approximately 596,591 square feet of impervious area. After the proposed improvements the total impervious area for the site would be 647,321 square feet. Lindbergh High School was developed on a ridge resulting in two different drainage basins, identified as the South and North basins in the provided TIR. The TIR has identified that three detention systems would be installed to mitigate peak flows from the redeveloped area. These detention systems would comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as amended by the City of Renton. Within the North Basin a combined wet detention vault and 60-inch diameter detention pipe system would provide approximately 35,415 cubic feet of live storage and 27,675 cubic feet of water quality dead storage. Within the South Basin a combined wet detention vault located in the student parking area would provided approximately 79,000 cubic feet of live storage and 19,800 cubic feet of water quality dead storage. In addition, a 60-inch detention pipe system located at the southeast corner of the existing classroom building would provide another 5,104 cubic feet of live storage. The TIR concludes that the existing drainage conditions would not be altered as a result of this project and existing site discharge points in the northwest and southeast corners of the site would be maintained, the site would provided construction Stowrmwater BM P's to meet the construction runoff standards; an erosion control plan would be provided with the site development permit submittal; water quality treatment would be provided by the dead storage in the combined wet detention vaults; and the dead storage would adequately treat all runoff for oil and any other naturally occurring pollutants. II F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: This site is not in the City of Renton water service boundary. The project site is located in the Soos Creek Water District service area. b. Sewer: The project site is located in the Soos Creek Sewer District service area. c. Surface/Storm Water: There is an existing onsite storm conveyance system. The storm drainage shall be updated to comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual with the City of Renton Amendments. 2. Streets: 128th Avenue SE is currently improved with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. Street improvements to include curb, gutter, and sidewalk will be required to be restored if damaged. 3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Emergency Services. II ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on March 17, 2011, The Renton School District No. 403 issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated for the project. The DNS-M included 12 mitigation measures. To formally end the appeal period of the MDNS, the School Board approved a resolution at their April 13, 2011 meeting to establish an end date. The Notice of Action will be published and mailed to neighbors and agencies on Thursday, April 21 and April 28, 2011, with a 21-day appeal period ending May 19, 2011. Compliance with ERC Conditions Site Pion REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPRI ENTS ------------~~ Report of April 27, 2011 Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision LUAll-012, SA-A Page 6 of 23 Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, The Renton School District No. 403 issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated: 1. As per the City of Renton Code, a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (CSWPPP) and Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESC) will be submitted to the City for review and implemented during the construction phases. 2. Mitigation measures, including Best Management Practices, will be implemented in accordance with theses plans before and during construction. 3. In addition, all work will be implemented consistent with the recommendation of the "Geologic Hazard and Preliminary and Geotechnical Engineering Report" prepared by Associated Earth Sciences in February 2010. 4. The applicant will water the ground as needed before and during the construction phases, including clearing and grading activities, to control dust particles. 5. Construction vehicles are expected to be equipped with factory-installed mufflers and spark arrestors that will control excessive emissions. 6. Materials stored on site (e.g. soil, fertilizer, and pesticides) will be enclosed and/or covered when not in use. The applicant will employ best management practices in the use and storage of these materials consistent with all applicable regulations. 7. As noted above, during construction phases, best management practices indentified in the TESC and CSWPPP will be implemented. 8. Stormwater design required as a part of site improvements will be based on the requirements of the City of Renton's 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), as amended by King County or the City of Renton. 9. Noise impacts associated with construction phases of the project will be limited in duration consistent with the City of Renton's noise regulations. 10. To mitigate general noise impacts during the construction phases, measures such as using and regularly maintaining efficient mufflers and quieting devices on all construction equipment and vehicles will be taken. 11. The School District's traffic engineering consultant will conduct a sight distance analysis for both left turns and right turns exiting the north entry, which is the proposed new existing left turn lane alongside the exiting left turn lane at the north site entry. 12. If culturally significant objects are found during site preparation work, the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation will be notified, and appropriate measures will be taken. II STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the appropriate recommendations have been incorporated into this report. II G. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA The Site Development Plan Review Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200 of the Renton Municipal Code forms the basis of the Site Plan Review, as follows: Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communft,, & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR( E:;;.N;,,;.7:;;,.S _____ ~------ Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision LUA11-012, SA:A Report of April 27, 2011 Page 7 of 23 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject property is Residential Single Family (RSF). The Residential Single Family designation is intended to be used for quality detached residential development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single family living environments. Objective LU-JJ: Encourage re-investment and rehabilitation of existing housing and development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that: 1) Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets, 2} Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and 3) Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. [gJ Policy Objective Met D Not Met Staff Comment: The above objective and the other three policies of the RSF focus on single family residential development. Evaluating the subject improvements at the Lindbergh High School against existing residential policies is challenging. However, a school is a compatible use within residential areas, and the improvements of the existing high school's emergency access, parking, circulation, and landscaping would not result in inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan's Objectives and/or Policies. Therefore, the above Pa/icy Objective has been met. Furthermore, The Comprehensive Plan contains policies on Public Facilities for the purposes of addressing the aspect of a public/quasi public use that is not addressed in the pertinent land use policies. The follow are Policy Objectives that address public facilities. Policy LU-76: Internal site circulation should be primarily pedestrian-oriented. [gJ Policy Objective Met D Not Met Objective LU-S: Site and design municipal facilities to provide the most efficient and convenient service for people while minimizing adverse impacts on surrounding uses. [gJ Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy LU-102: Schools in residential neighborhoods should consider mitigating adverse impacts to the surrounding area in site planning and operations. [gJ Policy Objective Met D Not Met Policy LU-108: Vehicular access to middle schools, senior high schools and other large scale facilities (e.g. bus maintenance shops, sports facilities) should be from arterial streets. [gJ Policy Objective Met D Not Met 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations a. Use: The subject site is zoned Residential 8 dwelling units per net acre (R-8). The purpose of the R-8 zone is intended to create opportunities for new single family residential neighborhoods and to facilitate high-quality infill development that promotes reinvestment in existing single family neighborhoods. It is intended to accommodate uses that are Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communit'-1 & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPRC c;E/VeaT:c;s ___ ~--------- Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision WAll-012, SA-A Report of April 27, 2011 Page 8 of 23 compatible with and support a high-quality residential environment and add to a sense of community. b. Development Standards: As demonstrated in the table below the proposal complies with the development standards outlined in Title IV of the Renton Municipal Code if all conditions of approval are met Standard Requirement Compliant Comments: Building 35% or 2,500 sq. ft., N/A No changes proposed Coverage whichever is greater. Impervious 75% Yes Impervious Surface Area is 40% of the Surface site. Area Setbacks None Front Yard 15 ft. Yes Side Yard N/A [along a street] Side Yard 5 ft. Yes Rear Yard 20 ft. Yes Landscaping Ten feet (10') of on-site Partial The applicant provided a conceptual landscaping is required complies landscape plan with the application. along all public street This plan includes new landscaping frontages, with the within the parking areas. However, exception of areas for the applicant does not propose to required walkways and disturb the existing landscaping along driveways. Such the street frontages or most of the landscaping shall landscaping along common property include a mixture of lines. trees, shrubs, and Existing conditions along street groundcover. frontages included landscaped areas Nonresidential that vary in width from 60-feet to Development in a 150-feet. These areas mainly consist of grass ground cover but also Residential Zone: A fifteen-foot (15') wide included trees and shrubs. Along common property lines landscaping partially sight-obscuring currently exists in the form of native landscaped visual vegetation along the east and south barrier, or ten-foot (10') properly line. Along the north wide fully sight-property line much of the border of obscuring landscaped the site consists of native vegetation visual barrier, is including mature trees, with the required along common exception of the area near the north Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR< :,'EN=TS~----~--~---- Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision LUAll-012, SA-A Report of April 27, 2011 Page 9 of 23 property lines. parking lot. There is a small section of common property line that Street Trees: currently does not contain Where there is landscaping and is immediately insufficient right-of-way adjacent to the existing parking area. space or no public The applicant has proposed to frontage, street trees provided both a 10-foot wide fully are required in the front sight-obscuring landscape visual yard subject to approval barrier and a 15-foot wide partially of the Department of sight obscuring landscape visual Community and barrier along this common property Economic Development line. This landscaping would screen Administrator or the proposed expanded parking lot designee. from the existing single-family homes that borders the site. The site is located along a collector arterial street, which would required an 8-foot landscape strip behind the curb. However, the subject sites frontage was developed prior to the improvements proposed as a part of the subject project. Therefore, upgrading the existing frontage is not required per the subject permit however; the installation of street trees behind the curb where there is insufficient room within the public right of way is required per code. The applicant has not proposed to install street trees along 128th Avenue SE, as such staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant submit a detailed landscape plan that complies with the requirements of RMC 4-8-120 and provide for street trees behind the sidewalk. Parking lot Interior Parking Lot Yes The applicant provided a conceptual landscaping Landscaping: landscape plan with the application. 35 sf/parking space Based on the proposed circulation Any interior parking lot improvements the parking lot would have a total of 344 parking stalls, landscaping area shall resulting in the requirement to have be a minimum of five 12,040 square feet of interior parking feet (5') in width. lot landscaping. The provided Landscaping shall be Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Comm unit" & Economic Development LI/\IDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR< c;;E/llc;.T:c:S ___ --------- Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision WA1 ~-012, SA-A Report of April 27, 2011 Page 10 of 23 dispersed throughout conceptual landscape plan proposes the parking area and 22,954 square feet of interior parking shall include a mixture lot landscaping, 66 parking lot trees, of trees, shrubs, and and 856 parking lot shrubs. Based on groundcover as follows: the proposed 22,954 square feet of parking lot landscaping 1,148 shrubs a. Trees shall be two would be required in the parking lot. inches (2") in diameter However, if the applicant only at breast height (dbh) provided the minimum amount of for multi-family, landscaping required (12,040 square commercial, and feet) 835 shrubs would be required, industrial uses. At least which is what is proposed. The one tree for every six (6) applicant has exceeded the minimum parking spaces within amount of landscaping requirements the lot interior shall be and therefore has requested that the planted. excess amount of landscaped area be landscaped with lawn ground cover b. Shrubs at the instead of shrubs. The School District minimum rate of one has indicated that lawn ground cover per twenty (20) square reduces their maintenance costs. The feet of landscaped area additional landscaped area is shall be planted. Up to consistent to the intent of the fifty percent (50%) of Landscape regulations and therefore shrubs may be staff recommends approval of the deciduous. excess landscape areas to be landscaped with lawn. c. Ground cover shall be The subject site is designed in a planted in sufficient campus setting. The parking areas quantities to provide at are spread throughout the developed least ninety percent site, resulting in a mix of parking (90%) coverage of the areas and perimeter landscaping. A landscaped area within portion of the north parking lot is three (3) years of near existing single family residential installation. development. The applicant has There shall be no more proposed to landscape the perimeter of the north parking lot adjacent to than fifty feet (SO') the existing single family residential between parking stalls development with both partially and and an interior parking fully sight obscuring landscaping. The lot landscape area. remainder of the perimeter parking Perimeter Parking Lot areas are not proposed to have formal perimeter landscaping. Many Landscaping: Such of the areas surrounding the parking landscaping shall be at lot consists of native vegetation, least ten feet (10') in pedestrian walkways, developed width as measured from sports fields, and bus drop off and Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communit" & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR( ;cc'ENaCCTCCS------------ Administrative Site Pion Report & Decision WAll-012, SA-A Report of April 27, 2011 Page 11 of 23 the street right-of-way. pick up. The installation of perimeter Standards for planting parking lot landscaping in these areas shall be as follows: would result in a conflict with the schools operating functions. a. Trees shall be two Furthermore, much of the perimeter inches (2") in diameter of the area is outside the scope of the at breast height (dbh) proposed improvements. for multi-family, commercial, and industrial uses at an average minimum rate of one tree per thirty (30) lineal feet of street frontage. b. Shrubs at the minimum rate of one per twenty (20) square feet of landscaped area. Up to fifty percent (50%) of shrubs may be deciduous. c. Ground cover in sufficient quantities to provide at least ninety percent (90%) coverage of the landscaped area within three (3) years of installation. Height 30 ft. maximum N/A Parking/ Parking Stalls: Yes The proposed parking plan complies A parking stall shall be a with the parking stall size, aisle width Circulation minimum of twenty feet (20') in length, except and ADA requirements. for parallel stalls, The required number of stalls is based measured along both on the number of students plus the sides of the usable number of employees and bus portion ofthe stall. Each parking if needed. The Lindbergh parallel stall shall be High School does not store buses at twenty three feet by this location; therefore bus parking is nine feet {23' x 9') in not required. Currently the school size. has 1,260 students and 110 A parking stall shall be a employees, resulting in a requirement minimum of nine feet for 236 parking stalls. This number (9') in width measured represents the minimum and the Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH 1-1/GH SCHDDL SITE IMPR( E:,:N:a:TS~--~--~----- Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision WAll-012, SA-A Report of April 27, 2011 Page 12 of 23 from a right angle to the maximum number of parking stalls stall sides. required by Renton Municipal Code. Compact Stalls: Each However, the subject site currently stall shall be eight and has 344 parking stalls and the one-half feet in width proposed project would result in the and sixteen feet in same number of parking stalls that length (8-1/2' x 16'). currently exist at the subject site. Compact parking spaces Because the proposed site shall not account for improvements do not increase the more than thirty degree of non-conformity staff percent (30%). recommends approval of the 344 proposed parking stalls. Accessible Stalls: 8 Accessible parking shall be provided. Aisle Width Standards: The minimum width of the aisle shall be twenty four feet (24') for 90 degree head in parking. The minimum width of the aisle shall be eighteen feet (18') for parallel parking. Number of Parking SE,aces Reguired: For Senior High Schools a minimum and maximum of 1 per employee plus 1 space for every 10 students enrolled. In addition, if buses for the private transportation of children are kept at the school, 1 off-street parking space shall be provided for each bus of a size sufficient to park each bus. Bicycle The number of bicycle No The applicant did not propose to Parking parking spaces shall be provide bicycle parking. As such, ten percent (10%) of the staff recommends as a condition of number of required off-approval that bicycle parking be Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Deportment of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR< E"'N"'T-"5------------- Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision WA11-012, SA-A Report of April 27, 2011 Page 13 of 23 street parking spaces. provided in compliance with RMC 4- Spaces. 4-0SOF.11.a. A new site plan shall be submitted at building permit review i. Bicycle parking that depicts the location, dimensions, facilities shall include a and type of bicycle parking facilities rack that is permanently to be developed. The proposed affixed to the ground bicycle parking plan shall be reviewed and supports the bicycle and approved by the Current at two (2) or more Planning Project Manager prior to points, including at least building permit issuance. one point on the frame. The user shall be able to lock the bicycle with a U-shaped lock or cable lock. Bicycle racks that only support a bicycle front or rear wheel are not permitted. Bicycle racks shall be installed to provide adequate maneuvering space and ensure that the requisite number of bicycle parking spaces remain accessible; and ii. Each bicycle parking space shall be at least two feet (2') by six feet {6'), with no less than an overhead clearance of seven feet (7'). A maneuvering area of five feet {5') shall separate rows of bicycle parking spaces. Where the bicycle parking is adjacent to the sidewalk, only the maneuvering area may extend into the right-of- way; and iii. Areas set aside for bicycle parking shall be clearly marked and Site Pion REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR( E:;:aN'"T.:CS-~-~--------~ Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision WA11-012, SA-A Report of April 27, 2011 Page 14 of 23 reserved for bicycle parking only; and iv. Bicycle parking shall not impede or create a hazard to pedestrians or vehicles. Parking areas shall be located so as to not conflict with vehicle vision clearance standards; and v. Bicycle parking shall be conveniently located with respect to the street right-of-way and must be within fifty feet (50') of at least one main building entrance, as measured along the most direct pedestrian access route; and vi. Whenever possible, bicycle parking shall be incorporated into the building design and coordinate with the design of the street furniture when it is provided; and vii. Bicycle parking shall be visible to cyclists from street sidewalks or building entrances, so that it provides sufficient security from theft and damage; and viii. Bicycle parking shall be at least as well lit as vehicle parking for security Refuse/ Outdoor refuse and Partially The proposed development would recyclables deposit Complies not increase the size of the existing Site Pion REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communit>1 & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR< ·"'EN.;,.TSe,;;,_ ___ ~~------~ Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision LUAll-012, SA-A Report of April 27, 2011 Page 15 of 23 Recycling areas and collection buildings and/or facilities located at points shall not be the subject site; therefore the size located in any required requirements of the Refuse and setback or landscape Recycling standards are not areas. applicable to the subject application. Outdoor refuse and However, as a result of the circulation recyclables deposit improvements the exiting location for areas and collection refuse and recycling is proposed to be points shall not be relocated. The relocation of the located within fifty feet facility triggers the screening (50') of a property requirements for this facility. The zoned RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, applicant has proposed to screen the R-10, R-14, or RM. refuse and recycling area with a minimum of a 6-foot high concrete Garbage dumpsters, wall and landscaping. However, the refuse compactor areas, north side of the facility is not and recycling collection proposed to be screened. As such, areas must be fenced or staff recommends as a condition of screened. A six foot (6') approval that a 6-foot tall fence with wall or fence shall at least a 12-foot wide opening shall enclose any outdoor be provided on the north side of the refuse or recyclables new refuse and recycling facility. deposit area. Enclosures for outdoor refuse or recyclables deposit areas/collection points and separate buildings used primarily to contain a refuse or recyclables deposit area/collection point shall have gate openings at least twelve feet (12') wide for haulers. In office, educational and institutional developments, a minimum of two (2) square feet per every one thousand (1,000) square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for recyclables deposit areas and a minimum of four (4) Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR, l;,;;£;,,;N,;,;TS'--------~----~ Report of April 27, 2011 square feet per one thousand (1,000) square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas. A total minimum area of one hundred (100) square feet shall be provided for recycling and refuse deposit areas. Lighting No use or activity shall Yes None cause light trespass beyond the boundaries of the property lines. Tree Thirty percent (30%) of Yes None Retention the trees shall be retained in a residential or institutional development 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision WA11-012, SA-A Page 16 of 23 City staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses as long as the conditions of approval are complied with. The Lindbergh High School has been located at the subject site for many years and the proposed parking lot improvements would not change the intensity of the building and/or use at the subject site. The proposed project improves landscape screening, especially for the property owners to the north and would improve drainage at the subject site, resulting in a positive impact to the surrounding properties and uses. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site pion to the site The scale of the buildings and the intensity of the use would not be changing as a part of the subject permit. The applicant has proposed new parking, landscaping, ADA access, and improved emergency access to the existing school facility. Under current conditions the existing staff parking has been proven to be inadequate for the existing facility. Many employees park along the road in un-designated parking areas. Furthermore, the ADA access and emergency access to the existing buildings could be improved. The proposed changes would improve the parking problem located in the staff parking lot by increasing the number of spaces available to staff, improve ADA access to the existing school facilities, and improve emergency access. Moreover the subject development would improve the current site design at Lindbergh High School. Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOO[ SITE IMPR l:;;E;a:N~TS~~--~-------- Report of April 27, 2011 Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision LUAll-012, SA-A Page 17 of 23 Furthermore, the addition of new landscaping throughout the site would increase the screening for the residential properties to the north and soften the student parking lot. Four Category 3 wetlands were identified on the site. The proposed project does not impact any of the four wetlands or their buffers. However, the existing development on site currently encroaches on the buffers ofthree of the four wetlands. The Pool building and the track and field area both encroach on the wetland buffers. Wetland A, which is located near the pool building, is within the closest proximity to the proposed site improvements. To ensure there are no impacts to this wetland and its buffer, staff recommends a condition of approval that temporary construction fencing be placed around the west side of Wetland A along the 25-foot buffer. This fencing shall be installed prior to the beginning of construction on Phase 2 of the project and shall remain in place until project completion. 5. Review of Circulation and Access The subject site is accessed off of 128th Avenue SE at three locations. The southern two access points provide ingress and egress for the student parking lot (south lot). The northern most access point provides ingress and egress to the staff and visitor parking area (north lot). The proposed improvements would relocate the student bus drop off to the student parking lot, however the small bus drop off would remain in the north parking lot. The applicant has indicated that relocating the large bus drop off to the student parking lot would improve the onsite traffic flow in the north parking area. In addition, the applicant has proposed to add a designated left hand turn lane for exiting the north parking lot. During SEPA review, sight distance concerns were raised about the new designated turn lane. As such, the applicant submitted a Technical Memorandum prepared by Heffron Transportation, Inc. (Heffron) dated February 24, 2011, which evaluated the sight distances at the north access. The sight distance to the south and north were measured at 315 feet and 235 feet respectively. The American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) recommended stopping sight distance for a 25 mph roadway is 155 feet. As such the exiting access driveway provided more than the minimum stopping sight distance in both directions. The AASHTO recommended intersection sight distance for left turns onto a 25 mph roadway is 280 feet and for right turns is 240 feet. The sight distance to the south is adequate for turns in both directions; however the sight distance to the north is less than the 280 feet of recommended sight distance. Heffron concluded that the all-way-stop located just north of the egress point would reduce the speed of vehicles to 15 -20 mph resulting in a 170-225 sight distance recommendation. As such, the existing driveway would provide adequate intersection sight distance to the north, and the slight widening of the driveway is not expected to alter Heffron's sight distance findings. 6. Review of Signage Not applicable, the applicant has not proposed any changes to the existing signage at the subject site. 7. Conservation of area-wide property values The proposal is expected to result in no change to property values in the vicinity of the site, because the proposal only includes minimal site improvements. Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Deportment of Community & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR cc'EccNccTS~~~~~---~~~-~ Report of April 27, 2011 8. Safety and efficiency af vehicle and pedestrian circulation Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision WAll-012, SA-A Page 18 of 23 The applicant has proposed to add ADA accessible pedestrian paths that would connect the new north parking lot areas to the existing school facilities. Furthermore, new lighted bollards are proposed near the small bus drop off area increasing safety to pedestrians in this area. All existing sidewalks and pathways would be maintained throughout the site preserving the existing pedestrian circulation system. In addition to vehicular transportation to the High School, many students and/or employees may ride bikes to the school. Under current conditions 1281h Avenue does not have designated bike lanes and Lindbergh High School does not have designated bike parking located at the site. Pursuant to Renton's bicycle parking standards, bicycle parking shall be installed at the subject site. The City of Renton Trails and Bicycles Master Plan identifies 128'h Avenue SE as a signed shared roadway. The signed shared roadway does not require the addition of a striped bike lane however does require the subject street to be signed as a shared roadway. The additional signage would increase the safety and efficiency of bicycle travel to and from Lindbergh High School. The applicant has not proposed to provide shared roadway signage as a part of the subject development, therefore staff recommends as a condition of approval that shared roadway signage shall be installed per the City of Renton Transportation Department standards. Moreover, the proposed AAD accessible pedestrian paths, increased emergency access, and improved vehicle circulation would increase the safety and efficiency of the pedestrian and vehicle circulation at the subject site. Furthermore, with the addition of bicycle parking and a signed shared roadway, increased safety and efficiency of bicycle circulation could be accomplished. See analysis under criterion 5. (Review of Circulation and Access) above for further analysis of vehicle circulation 9. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions Based on the provided plans the site improvements would maintain the same amount of access to light and air as under current conditions. There are no changes to the existing school facility proposed. All parking lot areas have sufficient access to light and air. The proposed water quality treatment system would improve water quality within the site and for the surrounding neighborhood, as it would treat pollutants created from the parking areas. Under current conditions the site does not have water quality treatment facilities. It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. A Construction Mitigation Plan that would provide measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control of dust, and traffic controls was provided with the project submittal. 10. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use The development currently exists at the subject site and currently uses City services and Soos Creek Water District services. The proposed site improvements would not expand Lindbergh High School's need for public services. Under current conditions the school has water, sanitary sewer, and storm system services. The storm system would be upgraded as a part of the subject project. Currently, 128'h Avenue SE has existing street frontage improvements included curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR ;;;1E;;cNccTS~---~------- Report of April 27, 2011 11. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration ond blight Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision LUAll-012, SA-A Page 19 of 23 The proposal is not expected to cause neighborhood deterioration and/or blight. Coordinated site improvements including landscaping, ADA access, emergency access, and vehicle and pedestrian circulation would be included as part of the proposed project. II H. FINDINGS Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1. Request: The applicant has requested Site Plan Review for the site improvements at Lindbergh High School, located at 16426 128'" Avenue SE. 2. Environmental Review: The Renton School District No. 403 was lead agency under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). 3. Site Plan Review: The applicant's Site Plan Review application complies with the requirements for information necessary for site plan review. The applicant's plans are entered as Exhibits No. 2-13. 4. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) in the Comprehensive Plan. 5. Zoning: The Site zoned Residential 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8). 6. Existing Land Use: The site is currently developed with Lindbergh High School. The proposed renovation would not change the use currently located at the subject site. I. CONCLUSIONS 1. The subject project complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained in this Report and Decision are complied with. 2. The subject project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family (RSF), and the zoning designation of Residential 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8). 3. The Renton School District No. 403 has reviewed the proposal and issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated on March 17, 2011 and imposed 12 mitigation measures. II J. DECISION The proposed site plan for Lindbergh High School Site Improvements, File No. LUAll-012, SA-A is approved and is subject to the following conditions: 1. Temporary construction fencing shall be placed around the west side of Wetland A along the 25-foot buffer. This fencing shall be installed prior to the beginning of construction on Phase 2 of the project and shall remain in place until project completion. 2. The applicant shall submit a detailed landscape plan and irrigation plan that complies with the requirements of RMC 4-8-120 and provides for street trees behind the sidewalk. The detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to Building Permit approval. Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR, 1;:;E;:;N,;,;TS'------------~-~ Report of April 27, 2011 Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision LUAll-012, SA-A Page 20 of 23 3. Bicycle parking shall be provided in compliance with RMC 4-4-080F.ll.a. A new site plan shall be submitted at building permit review that depicts the location, dimensions, and type of bicycle parking facilities to be developed, the proposed bicycle parking plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to building permit issuance. 4. A 6-foot tall screening fence with at least a 12-foot wide opening shall be provided on the north side of the new refuse and recycling facility. A detail of the proposed screening fence shall be submitted for approval by the Current Planning Project Manager, prior to building permit issuance. 5. Shared roadway signage shall be installed per the City of Renton Transportation Department standards. Shared roadway signage locations and installation shall be shown in the building permit plan set and specifications shall be approved by the City of Renton Transportation Department. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Planning Division TRANSMITTED this 25" day of April 2011 to the Contact/Applicant/Owner: Contact: Brad Medrud, A/CP AHBL. Inc. 2215 North 3o'h Street, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403 Applicant/Owner: Renton Schoof District No. 403 Rick Stracke -Executive Director Facilities & OperaUons 7812 South 124" Street Seattle, WA 98178 TRANSMITTED this 25'" day of April 2011 to the Parties of Record: Vicki Maddy 16713 128'" Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 TRANSMITTED this 25" doy of April 2011 to the following: Lorry Meckling, Building Officio/ Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Jon Conklin, Development Services Fire Marshal Renton Reporter Site Plan REPORT.doc ':{ f-21-/,r Date City of Renton Deportment of Communitv & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR!_ ;;;EN;;;Tc;cS ____ --~--~-- Report of April 27, 2011 Administrative Site Pion Report & Decision LUAll-012, SA-A Page 21 of 23 L-_LAND USE A;./ON APPEALS, REQUEST FOR RE~ONSIDERATION, & £;~/RATION; The Administrative Site Development Plan Review decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. Administrative Site Development Plan Approval Appeal: Appeals of the administrative site development plan review decision must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 p.m. on May 9, 2011. APPEALS: An appeal of the decision(s) must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the application fee to Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510 .. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify its decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. EXPIRATION: The Administrative Site Development Plan Review decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single two (2) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-9-200L.2. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex pa rte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPRI E-;:N,:,:T~S-------~----- Report of April 27, 2011 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT Administrative Site Plan Report & Decision LUAll-012, SA-A Page 22 of 23 The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes ore provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. The applicant may not fill, excavate, stack or store any equipment, dispose of any materials, supplies or fluids, operate any equipment, install impervious surfaces, or compact the earth in any way within the area defined by the drip line of any tree to be retained. 5. The applicant shall erect and maintain six foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (SO') indicating the words, "NO TRESPASSING -Protected Trees" or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (50'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. Plan Review -Water & Sewer: 1. The applicant shall apply for a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water District to confirm that the district can provide the required fire flow rate for the development as required by Renton code 2. The applicant needs to contact the Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District for availability, fees, plan review and permits. Plan Review -Storm Drainage: 1. A storm drainage report and conceptual drainage plan was submitted with the formal application. The storm drainage shall be designed in accordance with the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. The civil engineer will look in the Manual under Section 1.2.3.1 Area-Specific Flow Control Facility Requirement. This site is located, per the Flow Control Application Map, in the Flow Control Duration Standard (Forested Conditions). 2. The conceptual drainage report submitted addressed Core Requirement #2: Offsite Analysis, and did a Level 1 downstream analysis; please note that the project will probably trigger the submittal of a Level 2 downstream analysis. 3. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 (but not less than $1,012) per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Plan Review -Street Improvements: 1. The civil engineering plans need to include the design of all driveway approaches, including dimensions & the standard City of Renton detail. Since the driveways are private driveway and channelization (striping Site Plan REPORT.doc City of Renton Deportment of Communit" & Economic Development LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPR .:'E;,,;N.;;TS~--~~------~-~ Report of April 77, 2011 Administrative Site Pian Report & Decision WAll-012, SA-A Page 23 of 23 and pavem~nt markings), the S-~hool District propose;·creating separate rightt~rn and left turn only la~~~ Staff recommends that the School District have a traffic engineering consultant conduct a sight distance analysis for both left turns and right turns exiting the driveway in question. Staff will review the results of the sight distance analysis once the project is submitted for formal application. 2. Street improvements to include curb, gutter, and sidewalk will be required to be restored if damaged. 3. Traffic Mitigation fees are not triggered as proposed. Plan Review-General Comments: 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals, prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards, by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two (2) of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. 3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There will be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. Site Plan REPORT.doc N 1-.... cc .... ::c >< w ~ -, I I I 11 _, I' -r. i ; ,, b' ,~ " ' j I I .• , , . .Ji., .. I !· t, I! . t ',. 1 i-. 1' i I I I I I •. : :"JJ' ! ,I ,, ~' i ' .:.. ~. ~~-! I •,-! (: ::J '., \\y(x '\\ i··-. \ : \ I i I i ! I ., ,j-, I ,,_ i.. f :' f · .. / (' ' f :· .• ·:. r9-;, I i: I' ii. I j ~- ! ,I -'.-~ '-~- I 'i·· --7:----,--:=-~ ~ i 1 • i ~ i ;.c t t ~Z' • ~f .·', . ;:,~ ;:!!( __ ,- ~-I ---~ ' --.. ~ ------- --' -' : ' .. ~ u ~ ! ~ I ' 0 Ii . i ,! C (Ql C [ld1J] 0 0 ..... "V) C 2' ~ Cl) 0 = a: i1 ru1 0) L~ -C 1 J: 0 C ~ >, -U1" ::;! C: ~ Q_ ""P u iS ··--··-----.~-:ffl:J;, -~ -?·'~ /w·· , .. ,•)"' ' , , ,.·, ' I I I ' ~. : I . ' I' i I ,: I 'I 1-. !1: Ii i f i I I I % I ' ' ' I C: 0 --C: (lJ cc ..... 0 ~ 0 .... -,~-- 'I ---~-·..:. 1 !I C [Q) Q " !1.JLP > = 6 ~ = g [bi]j] y 2 Q q n " ~I ,n? ~ *i ,. --1, ~: ii; £il'i' ~\:- 01, . ~~-,,.. •• .,,,,><© "'" "''''"''"""" :::/.' I I' .:; i: ,. " 11 SheeW.Jd. View 1 -- Sheetll.1 -- ---Sheet Ll.2. View 3 - :1. -- l i i ,!1,0,,.l. SHEET NOTES ..... '° '"' "''"''""' _.,,, • .., ,~ ......... ~ ··~~,11~ s .. >hNl LU Po• ,~,.,, l,1 °''"'" I ~•"'"I'" ~,-~, "''-'"'""""'" .. , ... .., .... "''""""''-"""" ..... ~ .. , .. , ...... "''" '"""',/lq,,d "'-~, ~""'· '""" "' ""'"' ... ""'"'""''"'"'-'""""""''"°'"'"""'"""' ...,.. __ ,, '"'"""'""'""""""'"'"'""""'"'" "'~""''"'""''-'"'"'''.....,'""""''""''''~' ........... , ,,,, __ ,,,,,,,,.,;o-,c ..... , ....... ,., .. -.. ,. "· '""''='"'" •• '"· '"""'""'"'"'"'"'<!""•"' ~!::':.::~:.:.~,.:-.:;;•,:, .,',,';'.:;:::; "'"""' ~ / i • LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS :"':','..-~', ... ,~ .......... <Toot, 0 C~ "'"~eh ···~~0 ""' 0, M~· 00"<~, """• ,S ,, ., .,,., ......... , '" .... , ... , ... ., ... ,., -·~, .... . ""•!''"""' -]""''"'""""'"~ '"'"' "'"'"" '"''-''" (•1, .. ,~ • .,.,,,. ........... ,...,,,_, ~ "' M~ 'O[O Oj "'' "' ,0 -~~ (\\ v.'\ ... tJ' ·-' ··~·\' ' ' \ . -\ ,_J.- 0 c_, oo't· ,;\ l!l t , ..... S:J -IS'~ EXHIBIT 6 L -• +' .... ·::i, cl ''J· 1! ;i, I/lb. ' ,~a_ ':fti ' 6.~),_ ~ ~ ..• -•-:;',. . f,; q, .r~~-~-_(.'!\·: I • ': ·' )~,.,. . ···1\~· ..... l' q;: :81 "" '(\ -"'~(, -'~·n ,,._·9.-1:t J ··:::-C't~~ ~o ! . -, . ~·. _c';-~-(') ~ : I -C,) -i~-\. i q, ,,14.1-: J ~'H."/j ,,. "~'""' , ... , ....... .. '"" .. ~, .. .., -·· '""' ... ,, ,.,, (>Cl ,., •• ~ :;~~. ,, ... "'' ~ ~Lw'~ ,~•~, lo, lMO"'""' c,~~, .,_ """ •• '""'' .. ~ '""''""' ""'' ,,., ,,, • ., .... ,, ....... ,,,.,. .. ,(!IO•),,,.,..,.,, , __ ;·::..."':t:-" .... ·'"~ """' (J) ,. .... •' '""". -~· "'. ""'"' .. '"'' --~ ,.., "'' (10·1 •""'"""''"''"'' m,om,.a •-Oho ,,,.., •">'• of-, on.r,·-~ -1,-.. ,, .... ,.. .. b, '"''"""''"""'..,. !'.::"··"-"'-•ff'""'' ,. .... .,,,,.. "'~' ,, ......... ~ "'"'"'' '''"-·''~"•'0•1,..,., .. ,,,.,") c .... J:~-:r~-:: .. ::·~:::.::~~;~= ........ ,,, '''""'"'' ......... "'"""'. '""'""'-'"' ....... ~..-.I ~,, .. ~ .. L'o• I ::;~';'~'.'!' .~,;,';";:"J) ·:.:-.:~:;1-·: t'''". "'"~ "''"~-,, ,..,.,. .. -· -~· .... .,., -,. .... ~.----'''" .,.....,._., .... ,., ... ,,""'•·•'''"""~ IU,.~?::.;.;,:,· ..... "' ... " ""' ""' ""'= 1 ~-·""""-"-""--Sud, .... Kop~. o< '"""9coo••"•'-"'•"'""''''~"'"'~-•'•'"'i'') """ al m,•~,,, ~• ~• ,~ .... , '"''°"' ilMX) ........ " ... ~' C. .......... -. osl,,~. ••-•=• ~, ...... ,..,,~ ~· MO'm "'·-·~ '"'"''"""' "'~' .. , ......... ..,, "'"'""''" '" :.::,,,.:=.,,•·'·""''""'--..... <?,ci"'-Jmr<o-.!A...'.O ....... \ ~~,_,-/ ~I ·.. ~t~ of Renton Pl/:u/11ing Divisio1 0 i I ~ NORTH w to SCALE 1' ~rn·-o· I i rRi rr~ CG r~ ~w~ [D) .......... -~"" ,,..,,., ... ,, ..... , ... .,, . """''..._ ... .._.~, NC cc ''"""""''""'· ,CTIOr-.L ~ 'G11r, """"'-'""''"""·' ""'"'•C•~~· ,_,,..,,,,,.,,,_.,, SITE OVERVIEW PLAN L 1.0 > l " ' • b z z 0 ,= .~'°"' u t® ,!· 'I~~.·, \~o~,!; t5 UW -a_ ~ -~ ' ;-<( ' «u ' :,: "' " l'I l w C, z i ,, E ; I Z <( F '! u <(-' ' "' -' a_ C 0 C ..., C co QJ > 0: 6 " .... : I 1<-1 I a::i >--·! I 1-t °' 0 g 5 I ::c z >< w I ,. l ! ! ! I > ./ { ~-,1\ -.. ~)! f li ~l __________________ J -11 as ::mu.:,t._y IP8l1 N :~ '....J ! \ i \} -~~ ,,i -i p . ll · ! l 1 i ' ' i i i i I ' I , ! ! ! ! i i I . :, i . i _r~-/ 00 t:; al 1-1 :c >< w ,~ "" ec- ~;!; 0:; rn' ~N ,,w :, ~ ~~ ,o ~ z T CTl~I N ~ m w ~"-' :.:. '<!? I {, _ ·_ l'CWI 1, m N ,n m 0 -...~· •cl~rr, 1'i :)-.)_,,IC, w.1 1:,15v·;9 rouNo LEAD WITH COPl;'(R TACK IN CO,'JC8CTc set IN CAS[ BAS1c8ALL Fl!;LD ~::" ' ( (.:,;, ,fl ~~-- ~ . ' 1· -~---~ _)': <_ FAST PITCH -----::,.· : " i ,I FIELD ' -, , -~:' L£G£ND r::-----®=::"-''" _..,..,,. @-"-----O<-"'"" $----- 0----·- 9---'-------"""" ___ ... ., 0-----·- G-----•--~ ~·-·- """•·'®-., ... , .......... . ~-------_,c··--· er-=-=---:;,::' . ..___.,,. .... ,,.,,""-- '·--·-r __ ..... ..,, ·---· ·•--<-<fl>'_ ., __ ..__ ··--- .~----~.-...----""'·-·----. .,.,._ __ ,.., -- ·----· . ...,._. .. _ .. ---··-·-=t=:.: ... ·----~.,,--,,_,, _,,,_,.,, __ GYMNASIUM ~----:::....--:.._':::::~ TREE UNIT CAL CU LA T/ON5 EXHIBIT 9 ---,_ ,__,, ..... ":.a;;; I ~~m~,; ! ""''i.'i"1"'.-,, ,,,r~_-<•·• ;: 'r~ Jd. ,~4~, 1 ··· ·,..I .... ., ... 1~1 82 1 I/if , ... -----> . _,.~ __ I~~. -:.\:'\Wiil :·.c_~·-\ .... : ... ------~: -~_ .... _'h<~{._-. • •b -~. ~,: "'. ,, j: ~-0 0: If) sj· '"-,-.. '0 Of) I ,_.N N£';' '".-"·' .,.,,,., ..... HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING c, ··-0 •: ~l~ \ , ___ ,,/~:{ ',s_\ ,;;-::_ ( . oi?· . ~ :~tt:: "" o'".°'q, 0' .. • 1 ., ·/1' __ ,o~ , a,~-~, µio_ ,,f,,.,.-.,\cp ,, ,Q jzz{e ~ -. ·-· " ·,-r•d" ' "" " " ' -~ '-'t -,g,;r --"-' , 1i I w.~qy r,s>.1 " ... "•,ill ' ""f ' ' • ' ' "-w °' • '· w . "r-~--- 0 ·w. --ci::. I ~'3' -·~~~ '"'. NOT F'"'-,,"''lcf f; , 4:t .... ,,. I ., , IJ' .,· • ..,;. -~ •,., cr-·;;,I '.~' •;$!~'.•·~ ,j • -ta,:," .,, •« CON! .ON ;&~~l ..... 0 ' ' l.lt (ESM. 61~ ,t'.'ffl) ':~·-, ~--~ 'I i ' ' '," ·"" fi 11: (!:.Sf/ 1--1.51 ·· .. ..-,~ii cc,, i-I ~-.,~J o.~i. -~r~-., "h (ESM, .~?. --J!m!l'io,';.,ola' ''""""'""''"'" \>~ . i:, f ,, ~· ''"'"'.' \_, ___ ~-.J:: 'lil "',':'i (;; ,_,. M•\"' 1 i.£f ·,N88·o~ ·4 TREE , ... ),,•: ,~ . (c.~~/f, CUTTING/ _N (,,,., LAND ~ ~-_} HUI·' 1 1 CLEARING PLAN City of Renton 1-1 !,.111,rn·J(;1 Division w SCALE l "a·5Ci ·-C" L2.1 1r:n-,: tJ WE~~~ [Q) f;, [j w r ·' -·-_, I L~Jt .. ··1· .-· ... ~ ... -•·"' m r ;; ----'-d ---- ,w,e,:, 1"1!,S,0,/ ,w,~ ,.,,.,.,.~ ~,w, ~ ''·""<· '~·~ ",".,;\~'"""'" ~-·,.,,_.,. ,,.,,~ 55J.O(J' l"X~ .. )EGEND I0:..'=""-G"" ,.....,__,,,.. @-••• $----•- ~""" G-::= &-'--. ---··· e-;;:_ G--"""' IW e-:::;: <>""''>© ,.,, '"'''"'""'"' ,--:v-'-' -...... ,,_,_ I.J _.,..c........,..,, ""-- ___ "" __ ----~--__ , __ . --~~-· ·--"""--,_,.....,......,,. ··--- -~---. ........._ __ _ ...,,._,..,,----,-· ::=;::.--"'I ----- --·-"' -----· .,,._,.., ~ """~ "''~~.-.,F ,..,.._,,,;l'>:<•'1" "''"'°" ., . .,,. ,. '""'"<··· ,_,.,,, o: .. E §:r'.2_ I rns~~iR~~NN<S <:r ~ a '\ {j" _i '--.J) " •r) ,r-:tn ,, EXHIBIT 10 ,· !I '&' :;,;.· d' ~ . if • I 70 ([SM, • • >he-. t '20 -.\s:-Mf.'l ' ~-(tSM, ''" _ .. fo •l!):, ~ ... 1)0 I (l/ ~-(ESM \!;'".. j'J 'B,·.--... ,. ''.\., 'il'"(ci](· _--..!___2J,_, '"lf""' ([SM ,;, .~:\\i ·~··"< ' l ~G iJ (tSM-:-1 "'"""'"''"" EXISTING MUL Tl-USE FIELD AND TRACK .,,,~----- ·~ , . ., (F.S~. f' e! , .. :n.i (,$1,':9,/ ,,,•:,..,,, -I 20.0C ;~---.-,-(E~M.r. \ '·. • ?I . ·. ~' . : 171i ll . ·. ' . . / I I CCSM " ::.,<r:;, .. · .•. ~/ • ··}··,. ··. "··-.Q ' '\ . \ . "'jil <Qv,_"' < •·. -0 . h ;;· .. ,,_ ... .,_"' C-i ·.. < ,· -·= c,:; .... : • .. ·w • 1ss 14 "---- 1 , N 88"1• ,s ' City of Renton P1c.1r11·1mD Division 1cc) /t~ (r,1 fie; 11\)11/s f(')' ,f\j ~-::,~JISU w ,i;.;iy 0 _W l~I SCALE l"~~J"-,J' 2 NOT CO ~TION ~~ ·!;:'""iJllr ['®) ,11.f .. ,.,,. ;"""''"" •"•"'-'"""'""""'' ~,,.~,-- TREE CUTIING/ LAND CLEARING Pl A"J L2.2 21 'I p --------~! ' ' ' . ' ! I I ii o i I I ~ DD·, ' ! I ! i ' i litt'=i ~~ 1J 1- J)·.,i" ! ! I i ' I -...... ---cc--~- ~ ~ , , 1· '' ~:, 11" --~------I : ----~~· ' ' ' ' ' i • C: Cg) 0 C -0 rrAcl C ii, CL> ·s ~ 0:: ci = .... 0: Celli 0 C >, -LJ) ---' " i:3 Q_ -=~--~ -:;•;::: -· -- ~ rt~, •CJ z··~ <:C, -~ ~·. ~.~ VO N T"'I t- i-I m 1-1 ::c >< w """'"© - "'"'"""""'' ... \ .. ·~-,ee -~·,,,! .. --i zr4;=:::" ,f. :v /-::::::::j-=t "'""' 0~6~----~ -fc<0!,0'5> rLEVATION @ ~El A'N,NG ,~Af\ (0 ! ... L::;;"·"' .. ;}rr::::= .. --·····-·----····1 f ---_ _!!'._:I!'._ ,r I 1,-:..;, •;.::;,., ' ----· <>·•·-\ -I ,,___________!L" ·f ~ ·:·~::f [ · ···-··-fCTI n n b so,n<m"""' ~----·-·-·[LrVATIONS @ COMCOS' AREA(4\ ,,., .. ,... ') 1~·0' ~ \f-·-U---~t i: 11 ii • lj1 -·--···· -·-·1 /;. _,,.,_'"" ·~~ 'L _ ]_ ,-"tt-:i"" .-~~l """"~ ~.,;:'.' -' , .. , "'"'""'· 9" [L "" ·~ ..,.~.,..., ""'"'""'""' ------~[=Lc~V~A l=IC='N~S~@~,DLMPSI ER ENCLQSUllL(s\ ,1r-,·-r "-.:_j f ------~ 0~ r-11 ·· n , . ,,.-.. ,4--·. ... _. • . .. .. . _! -~ l -•o11nc,,,o, '''"""'"m"""-'" ----- "'"""'"'''"' ,.,,.,.;;,, ELEV/\l!ON'.3@ COMPOST C_O_fil~INER ~~CL0SU8[_(-J.,\ _J _______ _ 1/!',1'.,.\...__.,,/ I "--~ .......... ~ ... SITE DETAILS & ELEVATIONS r' 'I 1r -.;.: f,'\.,",;.;;;J 1G .. TO< ~:: ,.-,;,"",.:.::"" -l ,.,, ...... ,..,,"'""" """"''"~''-- , .,. '! ,~ ~.u .• s --~SECTION. -Bus ;;~N,.o_r;.l\."D r ...... ·- I ---1 ' I .. ~ f T~ 1-------'1_· . ~ ___ • _ __ _______ E:..EV/1 IION -BUS CP;~_:c,:::iv (j '\ 1 . EXHIBIT 13 City of Renton ···""""_; F'la1i,1iriq Divi,sion [Rl I re; r0 [~ n \V/ [~ rrJ . ] .~ \h:? -~ u \'/ = 11_}) A 1.11 . --,,---;:: 7; ~---__ .:.._ l> j' "ef"· U: -:_; .:Y ' r-· --- 0 . • _ ... ~-- 1·-, . \,. ~"' ~L g ~ z :i GI ]_ J ' z 8 ~ ~ en u_ ' ' :, ., I~ .. /' / / ;: UJ z / ' I s a a ENGINEERING REPORT I Technical Information Report Lindbergh High School -Site Plan Review I I February 25, 2011 D City of R Pia.nn;n _enton I 9 011,;s; in on MA,11 0 "•' .... I-~v, I ; [PJ lg rt;; lg§ fJf'. 1-1 co 1-1 I IE© ::c >< w I PREPARED FOR: Re-nton School District No. 403 I 7812 S 124th Street Seattle, WA 98178 ( 425) 204-4403 I Contact: Rick Stracke PREPARED THROUGH: :JI McGranahan Architects 2111 Pacific Avenue #100 Tacoma, WA 98402 2 Phone: (253) 383-3084 Contact: Tom Marshall I PREPARED BY: COU6HLINPORTIRWNDEEN I 413 Pine Street, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98101 P: 206 / 343-0460 I Contact: Keith Kruger I .II -:II S2. . ---rs -- City of Renton Plarm1ng Division , l O ZD11 TACOMA • SEATTLE • SPOKANE Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report PREPARED FOR: Renton School District #403 7812 South 124th Street Seattle, WA 98178-4830 PROJECT: Lindbergh High School Renton, Washington 210299.70 PREPARED BY: Theresa R. Dusek Natural Resources Ecologist Project Manager DATE: September 2010 Revised February 2011 Civil Engineers • Structural Engineers • Landscape Architects • Community Planners • Natural Resource Ecologists • Land Surveyors • Neighbors heff10n t r a n s o r t a t I o n I n c. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM City Of R P1 . enton ,ann,19 o· I II. · ..._ , .J1s1on Project: Lindbergh High School Site Improvement Project I o Subject: Review of North Access Driveway Date: February 24, 2011 Author: This memorandum presents the results of a site access review for the Renton School District's proposed site improvements at the existing Lindbergh High School campus. 1. Project Description Lindbergh High School is located at 16426 -128"' A venue SE in Renton. The District is proposing site improvements that will not increase students or staff. The improvements would relocate school bus loading/unloading to the south parking area ( except for special needs buses), would reconfigure parking in the site; and would widen the northernmost access driveway to provide separate left-and right-tum pockets for exiting traffic. The project is expected to be complete by October 2012. The driveway would be widened to the north, which would not change the location of the driveway's existing southern curb. The proposed widening is shown on the attached figure. The existing driveway serves primarily school buses and staff, but is used by others (parents and students) regularly. Although the site improvements will relocate school buses to the southern access driveway, the changes may increase usage of the northern driveway by visitors. 2. Acess Review Since the project proposes minor revisions to the northernmost access. the City requested a review of the changes including a review of intersection sight distance. 2.1. Traffic Operations The widening to provide separate left-and right-tum pockets on the driveway approach will improve site access operations. Currently, drivers turning right from the driveway onto 128"' Avenue SE can be delayed by a single driver waiting to tum left onto 128'h Avenue SE. With the widening and the two exiting lanes, this delay potential would be removed and drivers will be able to make turns without being delayed by others on the same approach. 2.2. Sight Distance Sight distance from the existing northern driveway is somewhat limited by a crest vertical curve to the south of the access point. Sight distance measurements were performed at the site in February 201 l using guidelines published by the American Association of State Highways and Transportation 6544 NE 61st Street. Seattle, WA 98115 Phone: (206) 523-3939 Fax: (206) 523-4949 • NOTICE OF ACTION City of Renton Planning Division Notice is given under SEPA, RCW 43.21C.080, that Renton School District No. 40\~0f i~11 action described in (2) below on April 13, 2011. 1. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise challenge such action on t~~~Mf\Q) noncompliance with the provisions of chapter 43.21C RCW (State Environmental Policy' Raf ';;'i;'allbe commenced on or before May 19, 2011. 2. Description of agency action: Adoption of Resolution No. 07-10/11 by the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Renton School District No. 403 (the "District") to proceed with the improvements at Lindbergh High School. 3. Description of proposal: Site: The Lindbergh High School site is approximately 37.25 acres. The total project work area is approximately 5.37 acres. There will be no changes to the existing school beyond what is listed below and there will not be an increase in students or staff based on this work. The existing high school use will remain the same. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of existing school district facilities. Site lighting will be replaced and updated, but existing field lighting will remain unchanged. Project will include two phases: Phase 1: • Lower Parking Lot and Bus -Relocate bus drop off and pick up to South Parking except for special needs buses, maintain emergency vehicle pathway, and locate lighted bollard in front of sky-bridge to keep vehicles from driving through. • Faculty Parking Lot -Provide additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility, repave existing facility and re-stripe. • New East Side Parking and Emergency Vehicle Access -Provide additional faculty parking on east side of school and enhance accessibility. Provide emergency vehicle access to east side of school and enhance building security. • Main School Site Ent:cy North -Provide new left exiting turn lane along existing exist turn lane. Phase 1 of the proposed project will start in June 2011 with completion scheduled for the end of October 2011. Phase 2: • South Parking Lot ~ Relocate bus drop off and pick up, build a covered pedestrian waiting structure and covered walkway access, and repave the existing 210-stall parking lot and restripe. Phase 2 will start in June 2012 and be completed by October 2012. Notice of Action Renton School District, No. 403 Lindbergh High School Improvements 4. Location of proposal: The project site is located at 16426 128'h Avenue SE, Renton, WA on King County parcel numbers 282305-9004, 282305-9042, and 282305-9093 in the NE Quarter of Section 28, Township 23 N, Range 05 E.5. 5. Type of environmental review under SEPA: A SEPA Environmental Checklist prepared by the Renton School District, dated February 4, 2011, was issued for review and comment on February 10, 2011. A Mitigated Detennination of Non- Significance was issued March 17, 2011, by the Renton School District and the MDNS comment period ended on March 31, 2011. 6. Documents may be examined during regular business hours at: The Renton School District -7812 South 124<h Seattle, WA 98178. A copy of the signed resolution is available on request. 7. Name of agency, proponent, or applicant giving notice: Renton School District No. 403 8. This notice is filed by: Rick Stracke, Executive Director, Facilities and Operations Designated SEP A Responsible Official Renton School District Kohlwes Education Center 300 SW 7"' Street Renton, WA 98507 Date: April 19, 2011 Notice of Action Renton School District, No. 403 Lindbergh High School Improvements Page 2 FACILITIES, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS CAPITAL PROJECTS OFFICE Renton School District No. 403 c· lly Of P1 At::i,..t c1"-1,n .-·, o,.., 9 D,11,5· - • I ton IRJ ~ re If:,' MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE JGJ/flft}J Description of Proposal: LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS The Lindbergh High School site is approximately 37.25 acres. The total project work area is approximately 5.37 acres. There will be no changes to the existing school beyond what is listed below and there will not be an increase in students or staff based on this work The existing high school use will remain the same. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of existing school district facilities. Site lighting will be replaced and updated, but existing field lighting will remain unchanged. Project will include two phases: Phase 1: • Lower Parking Lot and Bus -Relocate bus drop off and pick up to South Parking except for special needs buses, maintain emergency vehicle pathway, and locate lighted _bollard in front of sky-bridge to keep vehicles from driving through. o Faculty Parking Lot -Provide additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility, repave existing facility and re-stripe. • New East Side Parking and Emergency Vehicle Access -Provide additional faculty parking on east side of school and enhance accessibility. Provide emergency vehicle access to east side of school and enhance building security. • Main School Site Entt:y North -Provide new left exiting turn lane along existing exist turn lane. Phase 1 of the proposed project will start in June 2011 with completion scheduled for the end of October 2011. 1 Launching Leaming to Last a Lifetime 7812 S 124' Street, Seattle Washington 98178 I p.425.204.44031,425.204.4476 www.rentonschools.us Agent for Proponent: Location of Proposal: Lead Agency: School District Contact: Phase 2: • South Parking Lot~ Relocate bus drop off and pick up, build a covered pedestrian waiting structure and covered walkway access, and repave the existing 210-stall parking lot and restripe. Phase 2 will start in June 2012 and be completed by October 2012. Brad Medrnd, AICP AI-IBL, Inc. 2215 North 30'h Street, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403 (253) 383-2422 The project site is located at 16426 128'' Avenue SE, Renton, WA on King County parcel nU1nbers 282305-9004, 282305-9042, and 282305-9093 in the NE Quarter of Section 28, Township 23 N, Range 05 E. Renton School District, No. 403 7812 South 124'' Street Seattle, WA 98178-4830 Rick Stracke, (425) 204-4403 The Responsible Offici.~l of the Renton School District hereby makes the following Findings and Conclusions based upon review of the environmental checklist and attachments, other information on file with the Renton School District, and the policies, plans, and regulations designated by the Renton School District as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington RCW 43.21C.060. Findings of Fact: 1. The Renton School District is making site iinprovements to Lindbergh High School. The project site (limit of disturbance) is approximately 5.37 acres. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of existing school district athletic facilities. 111erc ,vill not be an increase in students or staff based on this work. The project will consist of the following itnprovements: Site lighting will be replaced and updated, but existing field lighting will remain unchanged. 2 Launching Learning to Last a Lifetime 7812 S 124" Street, Seaff/e Washington 981781 p.425.204.4403 I f.425.204.4476 www.rentonschools.us ~ RENTON Project will include two phases: Phase 1: • Lower Parking Lot and Bus -Relocate bus drop off and pick up to South Pai-king except for special needs buses, maintain emergency vehicle pathway, and locate lighted bollard in front of sky-b1~dge to keep vehicles from driving through. • Faculty Parking Lot Provide additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility, repave existing facility and re-stripe. • New East Side Parking and Emergency Vehicle Access -Provide additional faculty parking on east side of school and enhance accessibility. Provide emergency vehicle access to east side of school and enhance building security. • Main School Site Entry North -Provide new left exiting turn lane along existing exist turn lane. Phase 2: • South Parking Lot -Relocate bus drop off and pick up, build a covered pedestrian waiting stmcture and covered walkway access, and repave the existing 210-stall parking lot and restripe. 2. The existing high school use will remain the same. The use of the site is consistent with the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family and associated Residential 8 DU/acre (R-8) zoning classification. 3. The site is operated currently as a high school. Current uses of adjacent properties include single faroily residential to the east and north, an elementary school and church to the south and 128th Avenue SE and single family residential to the west. 4. Phase 1 of the proposed project will start in June 2011 with completion scheduled for the end of October 2011. Phase 2 will start in June 2012 and be completed by October 2012. 5. The SEPA Environment Checklist was made available for public review from February 10, 2011 to March 10, 2011. A Notice of SEPA Consultation was published in the Seattle Times, posted on the site, and mailed to interested agencies and neighbors of the property on Febmary 10, 2011. 6. There will be approximately 30,000 cubic yards of cut and approximately 15,000 cubic yards of fill anticipated on the project site. Fill will be sourced locally from an approved quarry, but the project contractor will determine specific location. 7. No new roads or streets are proposed as part of this project. There would be no change in the peak munber of vehicle trips generated. 3 Launching Leaming to Last a Lifetime 7812 S 124h Street, Seattle Washington 98178 J p.425.204.4403 J f425.204.4476 www.rentonschools.us 8. The high school is accessed cunently by three entrances onto 128th Avenue SE along the west side of the property. No changes are proposed to location of the existing accesses to the site. The northern existing site entrance will be modified to include a left hand turn fane. Heffron Transportation prepared a Technical Memorandum for Traffic Access on February 24, 2011. The Technical Memorandum was submitted to the City of Renton as part of the Site Plan Review application for the project on March 10, 2011. 9. The City uses the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), as amended by King County or the City of Renton. The Manual establishes the methodology and design criteria used for the conveyance, treatment, and flow control facilities. A Technical lnfonnation Report was prepared February 25, 2011 by Coughlin Porter Lundeen and it was submitted to the City of Renton as part of the Site Plan Review applicatio11 for the project on March 10, 2011. Sto11n water runoff will be collected in catch basins, open water systems, downspouts, and area drains and conveyed to water quality and 11.moff control facilities. The treated runoff will discharge to the downstrealll system. 10. According to Panel 53033C0983F of the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program's Flood Insurance Rate Maps, proposed project does not appear to lie within a 100-year flood plain. 11. Associated Earth Sciences prepared a Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard and Preliminary and Geotechnical Engineering report on Febmary 10, 2010. The Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington, as depicted by the Web Soil Survey, was reviewed to detennine the general nature of soils on the subject site. The site was determined to contain Alde1wood and Everett soils. 12. AHBL, Inc. ptepared a Wetland Delineation and Fish and Habitat Report dated February 2, 2011, that identifies four wetland areas on the southern portion the school site and one constructed ditch designed and built as a stormwatet facility in the nonhwest ponion of the site. Work on the south parking lot will be within 200 feet of Wetland, but outside of the wetland and its Category 3 associated buffet of 25 feet. The Wetland Report was submitted to the City of Renton as part of the Site Plan Review application for the project on March 10, 2011 13. Construction will result in short term noise from equipment operation and general traffic, during the pennitted hours of 7:00 A.M. -8:00 P.M on weekdays and 9:00 A.M. -6:00 P.M. on Saturdays. No appreciable long-term noise impacts ate anticipated from the site improvements, as they tef!ect the existing use. The use of the site will continue to be for educational uses, as well as community use of the facilities. There will be a level of noise associated with cmrent high school use; however, that is the current existing use. 4 Launching Learning to Last a Lifetime 7812 S 124'" Street, Seaff/e Washington 981781 p.425.204.44031 f.425.204.4476 www.rentonschoofs.us CONCLUSIONS OF THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL The responsible official has determined that the proposal, with the mitigation measures listed below, does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The mitigation measures described below are recommended as conditions of project permits or approvals. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, other information on file with the Renton School District, and existing regulations. This information is available to the public on request. The responsible official finds this information reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental impact of this proposal. MITIGATION MEASURES The following mitigation measures will be implemented by the applicant to offset potential adverse environn1ental impacts: Earth. Air. 1. As per the City of Renton Code, a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (CSWPPP) and Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESC) will be submitted to the City for review and implemented during the constmction phases. 2. Mitigation measures, including Best Management Practices, will be implemented m accordance with these plans before and during construction. 3. In addition, all work will be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the "Geologic Hazard atid Preliminary and Geotechnical Engineering Repo1t" prepared by Associated Earth Sciences in February 2010. 1. The applicant will water the ground as needed before and during the construction phases, including clearing and grading activities, to control dust particles. 2. Consuuction vehicles are expected to be equipped with factory-installed mufflers and spark arrestors that \v:ill control excessive emissions. 3. Materials stored on site (e.g., soil, fertilizer, and pesticides) will be enclosed and/ or covered when not in use. ·n,e applicant will employ best management practices in the use and storage of these materials consistent with all applicable regulations. Water. 1. As noted above, during construction phases, best management practices identified in the TESC and CSWPPP will be implemented. 2. Sto1mwater design required as a part of site improvements will be based on the requirements of the City of Renton's 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), as amended by King County or the City of Renton. 5 Launching Learning to Last a Lifetime 7812 S 124" Street, Seattle Washington 98178 I p.425.204.44031 f425. 204. 4476 www.rentonschools.us Noise. 1. Noise impacts associated with construction phases of the project will be limited in duration consistent with the City of Renton's noise regulations. 2. To mitigate general noise impacts during the construction phases, measures such as using and regularly maintaining efficient mufflers and quieting devices on all construction equipment and vehicles will be taken. Transportation. 1. The School District's traffic engineering consultant will conduct a sight distance analysis for both left turns and right turns existing the north entry, which is the proposed new existing left turn lane alongside the existing left turn lane at the north site entry. Historic and Culniral Preservation. 1. If culturally significant objects are found during site preparation work, the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation will be notified, and appropriate measures will be t,~ken. This Mitigated Dete1mination of Non-Significance (MDNS) is issued under the U7ashzi1gto11 Achninfrtrativ, Code (WAC) 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on th.is proposal for 14 days from the date of issuance. Only written comments will be accepted and must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on March 31, 2011, to Mr. Rick Stracke, Executive Director, Facilities and Operations, Renton School District 7812 South 124~ Street, Seattle, WA 98178-4830. Unless modified by the Renton School District, this dete1m.ination will become final following the below comment deadline. There is no agency ad.inin.istrative appeal under Renton School District SEPA policies. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.075 and the Renton School District SEPA Rules, 0 t ' ) Responsible Official: Rick Stracke, Executive Director Facilities and Operations Lead Agency: Renton School District, No. 403 7812 South 124'" Street Renton, WA 98178-4830 Date oflssue: March 17, 2011 Comment Deadline: March 31, 2011, 5:00 PM 7 Date The issuance of this Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance does not constitute project approval. The applicant must comply with all other applicable requirements before receiving construction permits and/ or approvals. 6 Launching Leaming to Last a Lifetime 7812 S 124" Street, Seattle Washington 98178 I p.425.204.4403 I 1425.204.4476 www.rentonschoo/s.us ... ' ,. TO: FROM: DATE: PROJECT: OUR FILE NO.: SUBJECT: PROJECT MEMO Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton Community and Economic Development Renton City Hall -6'" Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057-3232 Brad Medrud, AICP May 18, 2011 Renton School District -Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements 210299.30, Task 31 Site Plan Review Approval (File Number: LUAtl-012, SA-A) SPR Condition Summary and Project Phasing Memo 1. Project name and location of site Project Name: Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements Site Location: 16426 -128'" Avenue SE, Renton WA Parcel Numbers: 282305-9004, 282305-9042 and 282305-9093 2. Proposed Phasing of Project Please refer to the attached Phasing & Staging Site Plan, Sheet G.100, dated May 5, 2011, for the site plan showing the Phase 1 work. Phase 1 of the proposed project will start in June 2011 and be completed by October 1 2011. All work not shown on the plan will be completed as part of Phase 2, which will start in June 2012 and it will be completed by the beginning of October of 2012. The project will include the following work in two phases: Phase 1: • Bus Drop Off to South Parking Lot -Relocate bus drop off and pick up to South Parking Lot except for special needs buses. • New East Side Parking and Emergency Vehicle Access Provide additional faculty parking on east side of school and enhance accessibility. Provide emergency vehicle access to east side of school and enhance building security. Phase 2: • Faculty Parking Lot -Provide additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility, repave existing facility and re-stripe, and locate lighted bollard in front of sky-bridge to keep vehicles from driving through. • Main School Site Entry North -Provide new left exiting turn lane along existing exit turn lane. • South Parking Lot -Build a covered pedestrian waiting structure and covered walkway access, and repave the existing 210-stall parking lot and restripe. Page 1 of 2 C,/111{·fwdl E1j9i11eers 1 __ 1,1ciscaue .'11c/11rects CP/1111),/ll'h' Pfon11rr5 TA COMA 1115 North 3Qt )tree! Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403-3350 2533832422 2533832572 ~EtlTTLE l2006'"Avenue 'iu1te 1620 Seattle. WA 98101 3117 206.261.2425 206.267.2429 - SPOKAN~ 827 Wesl Firs1 A·1enue Suite 301 )poknne, WA 99281-3912 509.252.5019 509.315.8862 :/,.l .. V ,i,r I • ,_)_'I' The site lighting will be replaced and updated as work proceeds through both phases, except there will not be any changes to the lighting on the existing fields. 3. Project Conditions from LUAU-012, SA-A The permit and drawing set for Phase 1 was submitted the week of May 2, 2011 for City review. We have attached copies of the drawings showing where we meet the conditions in red boxes. Condition 1 -Wetland Fencing -For both Phase 1 and Phase 2 we will provide temporary construction fencing around the west side of Wetland A along its 25-foot buffer. The fencing will be installed prior to construction for both phases and remain in place until the end of each phase. Please refer to attached Phasing & Staging Site Plan, Sheet G.100, dated May 5, 2011, for details of the Phase 1 work. Condition 2 -Landscaping and Trees -For both Phase 1 and Phase 2 we will submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans that comply with the requirements of RMC 4-8-120. The Phase 1 landscape and irrigation plan was submitted to the City for review the week of May 2, 2011. The street trees required behind the sidewalk along128th Avenue East will be provided as part of the Phase 2 work. Condition 3 -Bicycle Parking -We are addressing this condition as part of Phase 1. We calculated on the SPR documents Sheet Al.01 that based on 110 staff + 1260 students there were 236 parking stalls required. Per City code, 10% of number of off street parking required = 24 bicycle spaces required/provided. Although we showed the locations on Sheet 1.01 submitted with the SPR, the location has been revised per the Site Plan, Sheet Al.03, dated May 5, 2011, which is attached. Note that there are (6) existing bicycle spaces on site, so we are providing 18 new spaces, for a total of 24. Each bicycle rack serves two bikes, with 4'-0" clear between each rack (i.e. required bicycle parking space is 2'-0" wide). We have attached the specification section, which clearly states that there are two points of connection. Condition 4 -Refuse and Recycling Screening Fencing -We are addressing this condition as part of Phase 1. See the attached Elevation & Retaining Wall Plan, Sheet Al.13, dated May 5, 2011 for details. Condition 5 -Shared Roadway Signage -We are addressing this condition as part of Phase 1. We did not get an answer from the City regarding the locations of the signs until after we submitted for our permits the week of May 2, 2011, so this is being addressed in an Addendum. See the attached Architectural Addendum No. 1 and ASK -001 dated May 12, 2011 for details. c: Calvin Gasaway, Greene-Gasaway Architects Tom Marshall, McGranahan Architects Q:\2010\210299\30_PLN\Deliverables_By_Date\Site Plan Review Application\20110518_SPR_Project_Phasing_Memo_210299 30.doo: Project Memo Page 2 of 2 Renton School District -Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements 210299.30, Task 31 May 18, 2011 ' ... -. mmmo d I I I . ! • I I , I i i i '" ,,~ ~~ H ,, !~ :o~ :o~ ' • 1i ,1 ' ill ill ~ D 0 z w 0 "j ,-- ] I I ' ' ! I I ! i ! I I I -I ill jfi I --~,: II -< ! ;--_.'J / ...... - r -----------------r- 1 IP .. 1 1-""' - ' L \ C) C! ~-(!) .// ( LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPROVEMENTS RENTON SCHOOL DISTRJCTNO. 403 McGRANAHAN ARCHITECTS BICYCLE RACKS PART I GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Bicycle racks. 1.02 RELATEDREQUIREMENTS A. Section 03 30 00 -Cast-in-Place Concrete: Mounting surface for bicycle racks. 1.03 REFERENCE STANDARDS A. ASTM A 36/A 36M • Standard Specification for Carbon Structural Steel; 2008. Section 12 93 13, Page I BICYCLE RACKS B. ASTM A 53/A 53M -Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless; 2007. C. ASTM C 150 -Standard Specification for Portland Cement; 2007. 1.04 SUBMITTALS A See Section O I 30 00 -Administrative Requirements, for submittal procedures. B. Product Data: Manufacturers data sheets on each product to be used, including: 1. Preparation instructions and recommendations. 2. Storage and handling requirements and reconunendations. 3. Installation methods. C. Shop Drawings: Indicate size, shape, and dimensions, including clearances from adjacent walls, doors, and obstructions. PART2 PRODUCTS 2.01 MANUFACTURERS A. Outdoor Bicycle Racks: I. Columbia Cascade Company: www.timberfonn.com. 2. Creative Pipe, Inc: www.creativepipe.com. 3. Highland Products Group, LLC: www.indoorbikeracks.net. 4. Huntco Supply, LLC: www.huntco.com. 5. Substitutions: See Section 01 60 00 -Product Requirements. 2.02 BICYCLE RACKS A. Exterior Bicycle Racks: Device allows user provided lock to simultaneously secure one wheel and part of the frame on each bicycle parked or racked. 1. Style: Similar to Huntco's HP Rack; 30 inches wide and 36 inches high. D. ,u3len31S: 1. Pipe: Carbon steel, ASTM A 53/A 53M, Schedule 40. a. Pipe Size: 2.375 inch O.D. C. Finish: Hot dipped galvanized. D. Mounting: Flange Mount; (4) 4" x 1/2" anchor bolts. PARl' 3 EXECUTION 3.01 EXAMINATION A. Examine surfaces to receive bicycle racks. B. Do not begin installation until unsatisfactory substrates have been properly repaired. mcg-ARC 0915.050 May 05,2011 ( ( LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPROVEMENTS RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 McGRANAHAN ARCHITECTS 3.02 INSTALLATION A. Install in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Section 12 93 13, Page 2 BICYCLE RACKS B. Install bicycle racks level, plumb, square, and correctly located as indicated on the drawings. C. Surface Flange Installation: Anchor bicycle racks securely in place with 1/2 inch by 4 inch anchor bolts through flange holes. 3.03 CLEANING A. Clean installed work to like-new condition. Do not use cleaning materials or methods that could damage finish. END OF SECTION mcg-ARC 0915.050 May 05, 2011 LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL SITE IMPROVEMENTS RE"ITON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 McGRANAHAN ARCHITECTS PROJECT MANUAL (ARCHITECTURAL): SECTION 00 50 00 -AGREEMENT A. Page 2, Article 3, change Date of Notice to Proceed from June 23, 2001 to read June 17, 2011. DRAWINGS (ARCHITECTURAL): Sheet ALOI ADDE\IDUM \10. I ARCHITECTURAL A. Add note: "Provide "SHARE THE ROAD" signage underneath existing signage at locations indicated on ASK-001. Minimum ground clearance from bottom of "SHARE THE ROAD" sign shall be 6' -0". Replace existing post if necessary to attain minimum ground clearance of 6' -0''. See 5/AI .11 for pole and footing, sim. "SHARE THE ROAD" signage to meet type Wl6-I P of MUTCD standards Figure 9B-3." Sheet A 1.04 A. Add note: "Provide painted white directional arrows as shown on Al .04 Bus Loading Area." Sheet Al.12 A. Revise detail 5/Al.12 per ASK-002. END OF ARCHITECTURAL ADDENDUM NO. 1 mcg-ARC 0915.050 May 12, 2011 11::e: >1,0Z ~QD~:Y ll!CJUIGNCLll8«:llru.1'1f' ' ~JJf ..... JQ ~ 11.l!ffC -----i.--- /\ INSTALL SIGN UNDER EXISTING SPEED LIMIT 25 SIGN. MINIMUM GROUND CLEARANCE FROM BOTTOM OF "SHARE THE l..!.::, ROAD" SIGN SHALL BE 6'-0". REPLACE EXISTING POST AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN MIN GROUND CLEARANCE OF 6'-0". /\ INSTALL SIGN UNDER EXISTING STOP AHEAD SIGN. MINIMUM GROUND CLEARANCE FROM BOTTOM OF "SHARE THE ROAD" /.I::,. SIGN SHALL BE 6'-0". REPLACE EXISTING POST AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN MIN GROUND CLEARANCE OF 6'-0". LINDBERG L SITE IMPROVEMENTS M C G RA N A H AN arch ec • TITLE, SHARE THE ROtD SIGNAGE LOCATIONS REFERENCE, A I. 0 I sCALEC 1" = 150'-o" ASK-001 ISSUED FOR ADDENDUM 1 RE~SED: =D~AT~E,~---~1=2~M~A~Y~1~1 _____ ·-· DRAWN BY: JR "' F 383 3097 "' T 383 3084 ... " i ~: 0 7 @ " 11' I~ ~ !I j '-: I ,_ -1 ' I ' I I ' ,._.,,. I" , II ~ n -, ~ z !'°' 0 ~::§;: ' ·~ ' ~'~ (~ ' i ' r ~!~ hl iJ:fl !1' :~ ! i}.,l \ I I I I ' ' ,r, f'"'·, I- I .! '! I ·' I! ~ 1 ,- ,, i ' ,., n < ~ "' 0 z ~ @ n 0 SC ~ 0 '1 ~ n n ~ f" n n 0 z ~ ,, z n ~ c, L p _o ,~ ,L -~ Cn 0) II "! l• ' ll : i I ... . ... .. r z ' . ! <I< !1 ! '1' ';.; 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1i_ -' .. ' .........,, ,L_ \ 'I ' ~ \ ./ \ I I I I I I I I I I I <L ~I~ ~ ~ ~, ~ C N I I ' I . SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT (...l.)A ll -012... l..J-6lh S.L YJ2nd St. • PO. Box ,:1,\03LJ • Rcnlo11, \VA LJ?'ll.l58-lll39 • Phont:.' (2:dJ 630-9900 • F,n: (2:;3) 630-52M9 January 20, 2011 Keith Kruger c/o Lindbergh High School 413 Pine St. Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Parcel No. 282305 9004 Lindbergh High School Improvements Dear Mr. Kruger, City of Renton P 1~nning Divisior·! Enclosed are the Certificates of Water and Sewer Availability you requested on the above referenced parcel. The static pressure around the perimeter of the school is 78-96, the residual pressure is 20 psi and the gpm ranges from 705 at the hydrants to 3000 gpm. lfyou have any questions please call (253) 630-9900 extension 107. Sincerely, Darci McConnell Development Coordinator Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Dmcconnell@sooscreek.com Enclosures \-\'\,1 w . ..:.oi~s;crL'L'k.com RECEIVED .!Ahl 2 1 2011 Coughlin Porrer Lunoeen, lnl _ .... This certificate provides information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Certificate : 5320 SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY Type: Rezone or other Applicant's Name: Keith Kruger Proposed Use: Parking lot and drainage improvements Location: Lot: Block: Development: LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL Parcel: 282305 9004 Address: 16426128TH AVE SE, RENTON Information: Lindbergh High School Improvements ( At!acti map & Legal description if necessary } SEWER PURVEYOR INFORMATION 1. a. ~ Sewer service will be provided by service connection only to an existing sewer main 26' feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed area. h .~ Other (descnbe): Private sewer system on site, all maintaned by the School District. 2. a :;, The sewer system is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. b The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment 3. a ~ The proposed project is within the corporate limits ofthe district, or has been granted Boundary R~·.·iew 80:rrd ::!.ppmv2! for extension of service oulside the district or city. b Annexation or Boundary Review &ard approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: a Connection Charge: b Easement (s): ' Other, Existing side sewer pennit ii 23385 Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and condHions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that it's facilities Will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities rn serve their property. I hereby certify that the above sewer purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT """""""'""""""····--·····-·--·····-·--. -··-·-----Agrni..")' Name Development Coordinator .... i-i"fiC .. Darci McConnell 1/20/2011 "'" . i '/,:;,;;;d \ I - This certificate provides information necessa,y to evaluate development proposals. Certificate : 4454 SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Type: Rezone or other ; Applicant's Name: Keith Kruger Proposed Use: Parking lot and drainage improvements Location: Lot: Block: Parcel: 282305 9004 Development: LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL Address: 16426 128TH A VE SE, RENTON Information: Lindbergh High School Improvements WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION l. a \{ Wakr will be provided by service connection only to an existing 8" DI inch water main, 5' feet from the site. Andlothw • Water service \\ill require an improvement to the water system of: 2. a ~ The water system is in con:fonnance 'A-ith a County approved waler comprehensive plan. b The ..i.:a1er sys.tern improvement will reqttire a water compreht:<nsive plan amendment. 3. a '1 The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for exknsion of service outside the: district or city, or is 'within the County apprm·ed servlce area of a private water purveyor. b Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval wlil be necessary ro provide service. 4. a ~ Water is/or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 5ft fee! from the buildmg/prop~rty (or as markt:d on the attached map): Rate of Flow: 1,000 gpm Duration: 2 hours b Water system is not cnpable of providing fire flow. Cross Connection Control devices must be in conformance with state laws. Service is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, r~.rulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that its facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. I hereb:r certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK \.\'ATER & SEWER DISTRICT Agericy N11.mc De,,eJopment Coordinator Title Darci ,\1cCoru1ell l/20/2011 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: April 20, 2011 TO: Vanessa Dolbee, Planner FROM: Arneta Henninger, Plan Review If# SUBJECT: Lindbergh High School Renovations 16426 128TH AVE SE -Parcel 2823059004 LUA 11-012 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non- binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal in Section 28, Township 23N, Range SE. The following comments are based on the application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. Water 1. This site is not in the City of Renton water service boundary. The project site is located in the Soos Creek Water District service area. 2. The applicant shall apply for a Certificate of Water Availability from Soos Creek Water District to confirm that the district can provide the required fire flow rate for the development as required by Renton code. Sanitary Sewer 1. The project site is located in the Soos Creek Sewer District service area. 2. The applicant needs to contact the Soos Creek Sanitary Sewer District for availability, fees, plan review and permits. Storm Drainage 1. A storm drainage report and conceptual drainage plan was submitted with the formal application. The storm drainage shall be designed in accordance with the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. The civil engineer will look in the Manual under Section 1.2.3.1 Area-Specific Flow Control Facility Requirement. This site is located, per the Flow Control Application Map, in the Flow Control Duration Standard (Forested Conditions). Lindbergh High Schoo! Renovations -LUA 11-012 Page 2 of 2 April 20, 2011 2. The conceptual drainage report submitted addressed Core Requirement #2: Offsite Analysis, and did a level 1 downstream analysis; please note that the project will probably trigger the submittal of a level 2 downstream analysis. 3. The Surface Water SDC fees are $0.405 {but not less than $1,012) per square foot of new impervious area. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. Street Improvements 1. The civil engineering plans need to include the design of all driveway approaches, including dimensions & the standard City of Renton detail. Since the driveways are private driveway and channelization {striping and pavement markings), the School District proposes creating separate right turn and left turn only lanes. Staff recommends that the School District have a traffic engineering consultant conduct a sight distance analysis for both left turns and right turns exiting the driveway in question. Staff will review the results of the sight distance analysis once the project is submitted for formal application. 2. Street improvements to include curb, gutter, and sidewalk will be required to be restored if damaged. 3. Traffic Mitigation fees are not triggered as proposed. General Comments 1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals, prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards, by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two (2) of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network. 3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There will be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards. cc: Kayren Kittrick, Development Engineering Supervisor H:/CED/Planning/Current Planning/PROJECTS/11-012.Vanessa/Plan Review Comments-LUA 11-012.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW REv1Ew1NG DEPARTMENT, Plan l<ic-mew COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-012, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 21, 2011 APPLICANT: Rick Stracke -Renton School District #403 PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Lindbergh High School Site Improvements PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SHEET . SITE AREA: 37.25 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 228,972 square feet LOCATION: 16426 1281h Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the re-design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop off and pick up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency vehicle access. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of the existing school facilities. No changes are proposed to the existing buildings and/or sports fields located on site. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre and is approximately 37.25 acres in size. However, the area of work is limited to 5.37 acres of the 37.25 acre site. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and contains four category 3 wetlands. The applicant has proposed to retain 511 of the 577 trees on site. A wetland and habitat report and a Technical Information Report were submitted with the application. The subject proposal required SEPA Environmental Review; the School District was the lead agency for this review and issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated with 12 mitigation measures. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT {e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Environment Minor Impacts Hausina Aesthetics light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transoortation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet /-7 ~'-{ ·"' 7 ,-L • Probable More Major Information Impacts Necessary We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is neetied to properly assess this proposal. i' '(\(. ~-'c,'..-~ ,, . '?\L Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ·. REv1Ew1NG DEPARTMENT: ·Tft:Ln ... -c{')r:-k-ficsn COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2011 ' APPLICATION NO: LUAll-012, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 21, 2011 APPLICANT: Rick Stracke -Renton School District #403 PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee . PROJECT TITLE: Lindbergh High School Site Improvements PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 37 .25 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 228,972 square feet LOCATION: 164261281h Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/ A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the re-design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop off and pick up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency vehicle access. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of the existing school facilities. No changes are proposed to the existing buildings and/or sports fields located on site. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 {R-8) dwelling units per net acre and is approximately 37.25 acres in size. However, the area of work is limited to 5.37 acres of the 37.25 acre site. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and contains four category 3 wetlands. The applicant has proposed to retain 511 of the 577 trees on site. A wetland and habitat report and a Technical Information Report were submitted with the application. The subject proposal required SEPA Environmental Review; the School District was the lead agency for this review and issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated with 12 mitigation measures. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Unht!Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoonation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 ODO Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE·RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact I or areas where additio I informatio · is needed to properly assess this proposal. ·1 ,, "-"d::.......::.. t_l -I--'/: (.-+-. pJ---". _,__· --"""-l O / / Date V Signature of Director or Authorized Representative City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REv1Ew1NG DEPARTMENT: (1 J,lf. -,\ 1 uLh i\n COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-012, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 21, 2011 APPLICANT: Rick Stracke -Renton School District #403 PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Lindbergh High School Site Improvements PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 37.25 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 228,972 square feet LOCATION: 16426 128th Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the re-design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop off and pick up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency vehicle access. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of the existing school facilities. No changes are proposed to the existing buildings and/or sports fields located on site. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre and is approximately 37.25 acres in size. However, the area of work is limited to 5.37 acres of the 37.25 acre site. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and contains four category 3 wetlands. The applicant has proposed to retain 511 of the 577 trees on site. A wetland and habitat report and a Technical Information Report were submitted with the application. The subject proposal required SEPA Environmental Review; the School District was the lead agency for this review and issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated with 12 mitigation measures. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT {e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Hausinq Air Aesthetics Water liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transl)ortation . Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS .. _ • ~ , A'/ ,, , -~ ..,( ~~/~--~ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact rop_:rly assess this proposal. Date i/14 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2011 I APPLICATION NO: LUAll-012, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 21, 2011 APPLICANT: Rick Stracke -Renton School District #403 PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Lindbergh High School Site Improvements PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 37.25 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 228,972 square feet LOCATION: 164261281h Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the re-design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop off and pick up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency vehicle access. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of the existing school facilities. No changes are proposed to the existing buildings and/or sports fields located on site. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre and is approximately 37.25 acres in size. However, the area of work is limited to 5.37 acres of the 37.25 acre site. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and contains four category 3 wetlands. The applicant has proposed to retain 511 of the 577 trees on site. A wetland and habitat report and a Technical Information Report were submitted with the application. The subject proposal required SEPA Environmental Review; the School District was the lead agency for this review and issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated with 12 mitigation measures. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Nece55ary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housinr'1 Air Aesthetics Water UnhtlGfare Plants Recreation land/Shoreline Use Animals Utilities Transriortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Natural Resources Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to Vtose areas in which we hove expertise and have identified areas of probable impact --~~_'!!._e!j_s wfere ad~it'.·~al informat~n is needef!O Pro,erly as~ss thi~ roposal. , _ -,, ···. \ I 1 , I \ \ ,_ -,_ .':,._____. .· --'... 2.. Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fire_ COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2011 APPLICATION NO: LUAll-012, SA-A DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 21, 2011 APPLICANT: Rick Stracke -Renton School District #403 PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee PROJECT TITLE: Lindbergh High School Site Improvements PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger SITE AREA: 37 .25 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 228,972 square feet LOCATION: 16426 128" Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the re-design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop off and pick up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency vehicle access. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of the existing school facilities. No changes are proposed to the existing buildings and/or sports fields located on site. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre and is approximately 37.25 acres in size. However, the area of work is limited to 5.37 acres of the 37.25 acre site. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and contains four category 3 wetlands. The applicant has proposed to retain 511 of the 577 trees on site. A wetland and habitat report and a Technical Information Report were submitted with the application. The subject proposal required SEPA Environmental Review; the School District was the lead agency for this review and issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated with 12 mitigation measures. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment M;nor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Liaht!Glare Plants RecreaUon Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transaartation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ~&A Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ·,) REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'VCLri::'.b U,,.n-/-: COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 4, 2011 0 go s~ J:> DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 21, 2011 "° APPLICATION NO: LUAll-012, SA-A --, -n ""' APPLICANT: Rick Stracke -Renton School District #403 PROJECT MANAGER: Vanessa Dolbee -< JJ ,_. PROJECT TITLE: Lindbergh High School Site Improvements PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger i'n z JJ --, rv = SITE AREA: 37 .25 acres EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): 228,972 square feet .=: z Q ;;") LOCATION: 164261281 h Avenue SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/ A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the re-design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop off and pick up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency vehicle access. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of the existing school facilities. No changes are proposed to the existing buildings and/or sports fields located on site. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 {R-8) dwelling units per net acre and is approximately 37.25 acres in size. However, the area of work is limited to 5.37 acres of the 37.25 acre site. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and contains four category 3 wetlands. The applicant has proposed to retain 511 of the 577 trees on site. A wetland and habitat report and a Technical Information Report were submitted with the application. The subject proposal required SEPA Environmental Review; the School District was the lead agency for this review and issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated with 12 mitigation measures. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT {e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS Element of the Environment Earth Air Water Plants Land 'Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Element of the Environment Housin Aesthetics Li ht Glare Recreation Utilities Trans ortation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10.,000 Feet 14.QQQ FPPt •. ----:, Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary :I.I - I I () rn -< rn 0 Jiu., .:;t1c~a'11d .'c~/c&_ 7J1?l4/cr/lt~pwJa;6o? '/rct1ls l)c/Jde,,z,vY):;; W'v?J f ~ {1,7cf./x_,-qa11d l2cc:v1#YJl'MC5c-h,n/ E,ntk ()~ _ c-r. Fai . oJt!~/, !My;, faDe:/5£~4 :S~/c#lf.~; :/'J«'ldd :tiz.__ POL/CY-RELATED COMMENTS 5 /71€.€, '1 :5, J?,u,..(. ;;t :5-'() ;;j///.A/'vL C(_/J_, /,LO ./[/1,/J 7fC.Jfcl! rc:> /)f;,7,,C; C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS '1,lc_UL (,,lU._ //W A/V7_kt'$ £1 /b/J £d_ ------------------.,;""J'f'J.."· MAP (scale varies) ,.,.. :L \\ ---.• :"\11 _,,y I' ,',1 "': \ \\u rr (°S'/ , Ibo_) .,;: 111 \°·;·'' /0/ : !:<;Of'\lotr' \1 ·~.\ 11$; I) •I ·1 . • I ,1V,, c- "ali<. - 1 \IJ! I . // ·-·-;i11· I,, '·.\\__ --,, /'. .. ' I 1t1.1r.·, it'.;tf'\ [1,{1"',·/;'/ > T1ffar:y ,_._Pa,rk '3,121c;!Sl \'"·l -..'.:::;".:...:.·1:-~;:'/ II~,, ; --1111 ·,\ iL' I --' - Soo:; Cree;., Pg,~ and Tra,I ! ' ,. ' --! ' 11 ilT/1.omas \1 ,-, ----I' -.-.-u? , , . .,, 1 ., G,1s.-,q__d~ -,, \ -· ~>"'"='>:'< ' . 'J"J ' -r, :, ~ \:'•as.dale (i'1 ,.i,,,11 , . ·-I . .!-I• --) "' 0 , ,J,-n I, Pa~ . .- ·1 I I _ \\ p.ir~ _1,.-.,, :;,_r;,_tr...J: ~1-SE JG 1·1 1 51 --.St" f: .:._ -: ~111.,H)': -\\ ·:. ·-.-·;,-_ f lj ·~ --·r·-..r'-.'."c'_~_q1r~'{O ',~,'d)-I,:• --~I --~j'"' -L ,, lw P. -----.--;:_<! \\~~; , '\., -Ci/ ~ 1 1 J 111 r •qh v11 .....,-r~I I 11 I --1, 1· I I ~ •I .I -~ t I I f,, ,. "\1, • 1 1 -~t '"""' ~· , -l ·· J.'c--..= \\--;"f".'! I 11 '?;JJ~!!Lf-•.-::-r.=a,'P!=-,-:•..--, e'il.::,;::-••"";f ~ :--;:-'n '1 '-'·' 'I ~ I I lj I CVAG I t R"'n'ur1 -•!\\1 i, I, ~ I II i BaHf•l"ld 11 Ir, I' Ir ~ Fl-,,iu, l'afk '\. -- 11 -.\I_ ' ,, ~, I ''· Ii '~ I ---, ·-I 11 -· ·11 I',_ :: ~:._ I. _. • Ii" -~r: 11 ,, --.)1 ', cyt)I" ---· --.i 0jl ,/ " -;,i'\(\ I' I ,1 ::: --.,=,c-,, .. ,. ·. ·-, I . ---,· c--,, .,,_ / "i°f '' .. '{';'0 • 1 :\ __ SU.!Gth SI __ -.1 __ ·~. -----::!.: .. ---=-:----:-::·_-:..:::.--. _-.. _~~::::-_"':-~.... ---.: 1 h_ u11uno'· "'~ ¢,:-='--~·w· :: 1i~ --·:1 --I/ -., - Farn1~/,(" t1 r, ,::;jl 11 ,, , ! ii :1 , Sc<::::.C,,:,A~ s. t: Can~-· '.. e.,~,.·,c:rn ,. ' I: ii 1 1 ui[' •I f'<t·~ .ind Trail ~,,:..~--= ..;_-.~· r Ir §II _Ii •I -: 'J) I . // 'I ,;,..! 1 <r ,, '. ,I . ~L_:--::·~-!;1 TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION(s) -,!< I I . RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH VARIES '®1 :;ti, '• .. i~ SID~J.,,;ALK j ?.ARKING I LANE I i I q'-o" }( I I J t SHARED 51KE/VEHICLE •RAVEL LANE VARIES I / S4ARED I PARKING I SIDE;..A:..K 51KEN=l--+IC!..E I LAN:: 1' TRAVEL.. LANE 1 Mli'I!. ! VARIES I ~·-o I ), ;, Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Proposed lmprovemenf:s (SE 168th Street, 128th Avenue SE and SE 164th Street) Project Status Origin and Destination Project Length Existing Condition Proposed Cross-section User Groups Connections Project Description Constraints and Considerations PROPOSED 108th Avenue SE to Soos Creek (SE 168th) SE 176th Street to SE Fairwood Blvd (128th and 164th) 2.4 miles(16Bth = 1.4 mi., 128th & 164th = 1.0 mi.) Collector, local streets Signed shared roadway , .. , .. , .. , Bicyclists and pedestrians, school children PARKS AND SCHOOLS: CVAC Ball field, Lindbergh High School, Renton Park Elementary TRAILS: Soos Creek BICYCLE LANES: Benson Road South/108th Avenu, SE, SE Petrovitsky Road, and 116th Ave SE; Fair- wood-Petrovitsky Park Bikeway A neighborhood school connection route, with ac· cess to Soos Creek 123 r ¢ Citvof, ~ ---------t{'.s"IJ(DJ'J ~ NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Mastef Af'l'llc:al:i<>n t,.., bff,, flied and acao~ ,.itt, the ~pa,tmcnl ct Community & Ea>nomic D,o¥,olopme~ rcmt-l'\a.Minc: Di>tislon al the City ct R•nton. Thit ~kiwi,..-IK!elly d1tKT1bes the application u.d tho '""""0$>r'I' P,,,bllc A;,p ...... ls. Dll.1E OF NOTICE orJIPPUCATION: P!I.OIECT NAME/NIJMBEII: PRQJKTOESCRIPTION: The oppl...,n! ",,.qu,,,strng Administrato.te Site Plan 11e.,;.,,w for the re-design of Lindl>ef'lh High Sdiool paclcing and S<le dr,;:ulation, includinil m" relo<:>1icn of the b!J'S_ drop off and pd. up: The propO<al i<d-• new pa.ting lot lar>m.Cilpir,&, iifhting. and ,mp,-o,-ed e=r;:enq •ehiclc access. The prol"<l " mtendtd oo imp""'" IIN! safety and qwl)ty cf !he exisci.-.g scho<>I filcilll,es. _ NO ,:l\ang,,, •"' proposed 00 the e,,..,ng buokling, ond/0< sporn fiold, K>C.lttd on ,ill!!. The "'biect site is ror>ed R_,..,denual e (Roll! d~ILng LITTits ~ ""' >ere aM is ,ppnmrnate~ 37.25 acre, in'""· H<:,we,o<:r, the'"'" of wo<l is lim,ted 00 S.37 ~ of the 37 Z5 """'>ii~ The ,,te is loc>ttd ,.ithin a .. "11'Tic h,,.r,1 arl!• and amt,,;,u four categu"I 3 -tland<. Tho! •ll!llicant has pro"':'ed I<> ...tom sn cl !he 577 1,..,,.,., ,m,. A wetland and habit.al report and I Tl!Chnical lnlormatlo,, 11<:portw,en, wom<tted with th_• appibt..,.,. The subject propo .. l r,,quired SEP"'-Env,mnmcntal Review: ti>! .S<:hool Otstrict wast~ l~ad •!•""" for rtus re,,iew and 1...,...i • Dotem,in.1t1on ofNon-Signific;in<< Mll,gated w,th l2 m~'El"'"" mea,u,..,. PROJECT LOCA.TION: 16416 :UB~ A~enue SE P\J8UCAPPROVAI...S: /1,PPUCANT/l'flOJKTCOtCTACT PEKSON. and Medrud, AICP; AHBL Inc.; 211.'i N 30~ Stre!:!~300: T,r:oma, WA 93403; Eml, bmedrud@ahOl.com P!.18UC HEARING: N/"'- Co"""°"IS on tt.. .i.ov.. appl.:attcn must: be wbmltt,od In writln& IO Vanessa eoti..., S.nio• Planner, O,,partrn<nt of eomm""ity & Eco<mmi< Deffa,pment. 1055 South G.-..!y Way, R.ntun, WA. 9!057, by s:00 p.m. on A.prU_4, 2DlL If ycu have question,abol't !h,s proposal. or ..,.h to O<I made• party 01~,,; ar,d ,ea:"" addrt><>n•I r>at,fic.a00<1 by mail contact tho! !'foject Manager ot (~2S) 430-7314. Anycne wl>o 5'Jbmjt<; written oomments will automah::ally become • p,a(l\' of ....aird and will be notified of an,-deasion on !hi< project. w you ....,uld ik• lo be m~ a partyol =ord 10 n,,:,,ive furthter information on !hr, propcse<I proje<::!. comploW this. fo,m and return to: Utyof 11<:nron, cro. Pl.onnin& Division. lOS'i South~ Wav, 11<:nton, WA 9BOS7 Rloe Nam•/ 1110.: 11<:n1cn 1-li(~ ;c~ Sile lmpro,em,,nt'I/ LUAll-0:U. SA·"'- NAML ---------------------------- MAJLIIIIGADOR.ESS; ________________________ _ TELEPl'\DNE NO.:------------ PLEASE INClUOETHE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CAWNG FDR PROPER FILE IOENT1F!CAT10N DATE Of A.PPUCA110N: March 10, 2011 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 11, 2011 CERTIFICATION I, i/Qf\eI{''{).._ Dzi /b;e . hereby certify that e3 copies of the above document were posted in ..3._ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: i'J /2 J /2(J// . ) Signe~CDbU fld:°ho &. STATE OF WASHINGTON 55 COUNTY OF KING Notary (Print): '· My appointment expires: , . , } ,, :; ----~=,-~----~------------- CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 21st day of March, 2011, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter and Notice of Application (NOA) documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Brad Medrud -AHBL, Inc. Contact Rick Stracke -Renton School District Owner/Applicant 300' Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See attached P+ "'A ....-1 • • /' f'~ """''""-, .... (Signature of Sender): ><1{.gc} J(I ',..J{,v.-K..t,./ £ .... ~"'ri / ,~~~, STATE OF WASHINGTON I I .,,,,.. \ ) ss S_ ~-•• ~ • ~ COUNTY OF KING ) \" ..,,.~~'\ / ~ E \ .,.~ ··29-~.rt.,t:' § I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker t\ o,.. """' ";,It J signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for~u-~\~poses 11(11,,-"l.~ mentioned in the instrument. Dated : --', ,""'; '"'"' "'--''"'"'--.,_/ .,_I ....-, .._J ""' ..._11 ) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): "i ,• 1. {,,, ,,J, : / ----~~-~~~~--------------My appointment expires: ,.".)_ t\ )L>l) ( Lindbergh High School Site Improvements LUAll-012, SA-A NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: March 21, 2011 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Renton High School Site Improvements/ LUAll-012, SA-A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review for the re-design of Lindbergh High School parking and site circulation, including the relocation of the bus drop off and pick up. The proposal includes new parking lot landscaping, lighting, and improved emergency vehicle access. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of the existing school facilities. No changes are proposed to the existing buildings and/or sports fields located on site. The subject site is zoned Residential 8 (R-8) dwelling units per net acre and is approximately 37.25 acres in size. However, the area of work is limited to 5.37 acres of the 37.25 acre site. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and contains four category 3 wetlands. The applicant has proposed to retain 511 of the 577 trees on site. A wetland and habitat report and a Technical Information Report were submitted with the application. The subject proposal required SEPA Environmental Review; the School District was the lead agency for this review and issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated with 12 mitigation measures. PROJECT LOCATION: 16426 128th AVenue SE PUBLIC APPROVALS: Administrative Site Development Plan Review approval APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Brad Medrud, AICP; AHBL, Inc.; 2215 N 30th Street #300; Tacoma, WA 98403; Eml: bmedrud@ahbl.com PUBLIC HEARING: N/ A Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Vanessa Dolbee, Senior Planner, Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 p.m. on April 4, 2011. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7314. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. File Name/ No.: Renton High School Site Improvements/ LUAll-012, SA-A NAME: --------------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: ________________________________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: March 10, 2011 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 21, 2011 0284) Q290 ! 0130 0170 053/J · 0150 0160 0~ 0!,50 SEtl!lrHsr {G) 20b!3$iiing Gou nty 1110 1100 IJ!lM s.e. 164'rH_sr 0950 ------------- 003<1 !}{)()7 0040 0050 0110 0000 R-6 / 0010 / 0(60 / IJ450 / 0660 ! 0<30 ii,°68/) ;:,400\owo SE JMTff PL &7) 0480 0590 / 0490 0580 I 05/)() 0510 ll\510 1)661) I i' :: ~"l,, i1 4:' =o ~j l j ~ {)210 0210 O~XI o-01it i' 0230 1423910010 CANNON CASANDRA A+ANTHONY 12758 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910040 SIMS ROBERT N 12732 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910140 SCHARF ALAN T +CAROL A 12725 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423910170 METZGER RUSSEL G 12749 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423910200 SCHORR WALDEMAR 12736 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423910260 DIXON KELLEY 16648 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910290 GREENHOW LAURA L 16630 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910320 MOORE LUANNE 16608 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910350 FAJARDO JOVENTINO E+ELISA J 12715 SE 166TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910380 BENNETT CAROL 12736 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910020 HODGES BOBBY P+LIEZL 12750 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910050 MORA VICTOR M 12724 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910150 AMORANTO CONCHITA & ROSAURO 12735 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423910180 SIMMONS STEVEN M+MICHELE MA 12748 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423910210 BJORNSON PAMELA 12728 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423910270 MAY LAURAL 16642 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910300 FRIEDMAN ALLAN+NANCY HARKRIDER- 16624 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910330 NEWBY NAPHTALI A 12701 SE 166TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910360 JEANNE GISELE M 12744 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910390 BAKER WILLIAM H 12732 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910030 SIMS BRIAN N 12742 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910130 EICHERS ELFRIEDE M 12717 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423910160 THEROU JAMES E + LINDA A 12743 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423910190 BELMONTES RAUL VASQUEZ 12744 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423910220 HENDERSON JULIA M 12722 SE 167TH PL RENTON WA 98058 1423910280 ZETTERWALL TIMOTHY P+ TERESA 16636 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910310 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 16618 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910340 REICHOW FAMILY LLC 12707 SE 166TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910370 BECKER DONALD !+LINDA C 12740 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910400 MCLAUGHLIN PROPERTIES LLC 12728 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910410 BROWN DAVE 12724 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910440 MCLAUGHLIN PROPERTIES LLC 12721 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910470 JOHNSON LARRY 16705 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910500 FOLIART UTE M 16727 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910530 SOINGCO CATHARINA 16749 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910560 PATRIARCA RICARDO C 16417 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910590 IVANICH GEORGE W 12716 SE 166TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910620 DILLON DONALD G 12654 SE 165TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910650 VALDEZ AL MANAOIS 16420 126TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910680 SHAEFFER LESLIE L & MERNA R 16431 126TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910420 WILKINSON CARL 12720 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910450 MCLAUGHLIN PROPERTIES LLC 12725 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910480 MADDY RONALD D+VICKI L 16713 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910510 MABE JOSEPH 16735 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910540 SCHAEFER REINHART B+LURIAN 16757 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910570 HILL ESSIE B 16425 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910600 ALVAREZ ANA C 12710 SE 166TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910630 STAMPS LORRAINE 16428 126TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910660 RIVERA CLAUDIA 16423 126TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910690 HAYES ROBERT 12646 SE 165TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910430 HANSEN RAYMOND+FAYE 12717 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910460 MUNKERS DONALD R 12733 SE 167TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910490 BELTRAN RUPERTO F+LORENE B 16721 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910520 PHILBIN HAROLD F 16741 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910550 DANAO TORIBIO K+EDNA M 16763 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910580 HASKIN GARY E 16433 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910610 VALDEZ JESUS LARA+NANCY L VENEGAS 12660 SE 165TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423910640 MCDANIEL THEODORE R JR 16424 126TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 1423910670 GION FRANCIS W 16427 126TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 1423911000 TO PHEAP+YAN NHEP 16516 126TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 1423911010 O'BRIEN MICHAEL T 12655 SE 165TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1423911040 LATS YURIY T +ANETA 16617 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1432700020 GOLDSBARY DEBORAH K+ 12691 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432700050 ANDERSON DAVID R 12671 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432700260 SOLIHIN ADANG + 12690 SE 169TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900120 PETERSON JOHN W+SHEILA 16315 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1432900150 HAWRON DAVID G 12762 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900230 ROSETE JASON A+LEILANI C DI 12723 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900260 GAW WM C & LANDES S L 12759 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900290 GAUR VINOD+JEANY RAMIREZ 16407 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423911020 NEWSOME DON 16605 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423911050 HO PHONG THANH+HUYNH PHUONG- THAO 16623 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1432700030 MORGAN HOWARD R JR 12685 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432700240 JANOSOV FRANCIS D+LOIS A 12674 SE 169TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432700270 ROOD DUANE M 12696 SE 169TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900130 LEEDY HELEN+DYKES LINDA K 16323 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1432900160 SCHMIDT CHARLES A 12754 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900240 HIBBELN BRIAN 12731 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900270 SHARMA JYOTI 12767 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900330 SWANSON DAVID M 16306 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1423911030 ACOSTA JOSE'R+CONNIE 16611 127TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1432700010 TERRONOVA KIMBERLY 12697 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432700040 HAUSKEN DONALD+SALLY 12677 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432700250 WEBSTER KEVIN+ TITIEN 12684 SE 169TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900110 MATIHEWS ERIC D & KATHERINE 16305 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1432900140 SCHOLL DOUGLAS E+STEPHANIE 12770 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900170 BAUTISTA DIOSDADO R 16312 127TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 1432900250 DIEMERT DUSTIN 12751 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900280 DUMAGUING JIMWELL G 12801 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900340 FELDER ISAAC N 16312 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 1432900350 MONILLAS CELSO D+TERESITA L 16318 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473360270 ANN MARIE LINN LLC 19244 39TH AVES SEATAC WA 98188 2473380380 FIGUEROA ROBERT B 16342 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380410 SIDORCHUK VALERIY B 16320 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380630 DEMISE FRED !+CAROL J 16303 128TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380660 WOLFORD CURTIS L+DAWN C 16323 128TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380690 GALINDO MARIA CECILIA MORENA 12811 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380720 BREDA BEVERLY F 12831 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380750 SANFORD RONALD W 12915 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380780 HAGOS NIGISTY T 13011 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900360 WILLIAMS JOYCE C 16324 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380360 GUKETLOV ZAURBEK+SVETLANA 13122 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380390 AMORANTO ARMANDO R 16336 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380420 NEARY EDWARD F 16318 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380640 O'REAR JEFFREYS 16309 128TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380670 BARTHOLOMEW ARTHUR J 16325 128TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380700 CALDWELL RICHARD G+LAURA J 12817 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380730 STEWART RAYMOND R 12903 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380760 MCMULLIN COLIN D+KATHY C 13001 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380790 RESPICIO GERALD M 13019 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 1432900370 TORRES MARY DESIREE G 16332 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380370 OLSON DAVID A 13112 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380400 DIAMOND ELAINE R 16332 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380430 CARPENTER THANE L+BEATRICE 16312 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380650 WONG KIN YIP 16317 128TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380680 PANDHER AMRIK S 12803 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380710 BASHA WORKU+WOUBRST K AYELE 12825 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380740 RODRIGUEZ JESUS ET AL 12909 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380770 HSBC BANK USA NA 13007 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380800 CLAAR RODNEY C+CHRISTINE S 13025 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380810 BADANGUIO EDWIN C+ROSENELIA 13031 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380840 ALLEN ROGER W 13111 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380870 NEWBILL MARY K 13012 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380900 WONG JEFFREY L 16362 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380930 EDWARDS THOMAS M & LISA A 16363 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380960 ROMERO PETE & ALBA 16394 129TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380990 TRATHEN RANDALL S 16374 129TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381070 PAVLAKIS ANTHONY 16373 129TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381100 SMITH JENNETH I 16393 129TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381130 MATUS JEPTHE N MORALES 16318 128TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380820 AYELE GETAHUN+AMELEWORK N B 13101 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380850 DEGROOT JERRY 16339 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380880 PETERSON DALE 16376 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380910 TUCKER INVESTMENTS 16350 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380940 RICHARDS ANDREW P+EILEEN T 16371 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380970 FORWARD JOHN R 16388 129TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381000 PERDE LIVIU A+IOANA M 16366 129TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381080 HARSCH PATTI J 16379 129TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381110 LOPEZ MARIA GUADALUPE 16330 128TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381140 ALLEN MARCELLA+MICHAEL 16310 128TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380830 DURAN ALEJANDRO G+MARIA 0 13105 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380860 PRENGEL ROGER H 13022 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2473380890 KUMARAN KISHOR+SANGEETA M 16370 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380920 DAVIS RONALEE J 16355 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380950 SNYDER JULLEEN J+RICHARD B 16377 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473380980 PIOQUINTO REYNITA L 16380 129TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381060 MARSEE DAVID G+MICHELE 16365 129TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381090 WOODMAN ROBERT PAUL+CAROL D 16387 129TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381120 MUWANGUZI PATRICK 16324 128TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381150 ALDACUSHION DAVID W+MARTHA 16304 128TH PL SE RENTON WA 98058 •• 2473381270 OVERLIN JOHN K 16303 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381300 BRADY S & VIAENE LOIS L 16321 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400130 DICKSON DAN+LINDA 16541 132ND PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400160 OSBORNE VIKKI 16617 132ND PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400190 THE HAMMOND COMPANY 16713 132ND PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400730 FAIRWOOD CREST HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PO BOX 58004 RENTON WA 98058 2823059064 SOOS CREEK WATER & SEWER 13113 SE 164TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2823059099 RENTON PARK CHAPEL EVANGELI 12844 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 7229200390 BARTLETT MATTHEW & KRISTEN 16918 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381280 CHAVEZ MIGUEL 16309 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381310 TAKAHASHI STEVEN LEE 16329 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400140 HARRIS LEE G 16601132ND PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400170 OLSON DAVID S 16625 132ND PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400200 CHANG CHRISTI ELEANOR 16723 132ND PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2823059004 FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR 16426 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2823059084 FACILITIES & OPERATIONS CTR 16828 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 7229200010 CAPERS LEWIS 16917 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473381290 CORCORAN KAREN+ JAMES 16315 131ST AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400120 GOOD FREDERICK H+DEBORAH A 16535 132ND PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400150 STOKES SHANTIH CABLE+ TOMOKO 16609 132ND PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400180 CASTRO MANUEL T+BAMBI L 16705 132ND PL SE RENTON WA 98058 2473400210 ALAIBILLA JOSE l+YVONNE K 13203 SE 168TH ST RENTON WA 98058 2823059018 CITY OF SEATTLE 700 5TH AVE #2000 PO BOX 34019 SEATTLE WA 98124 2823059087 RENTON PARK CHAPEL 16760 128TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 7229200020 PRESTON TOM+HERIETTA 16925 130TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98058 Denis Law c· f _ ___:May:or --------1~~'(\t_<)J:) March 21, 2011 Brad Medrud, AICP AHBL, Inc. 2215 N 30th Street #300 Tacoma, WA 98403 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application Lindbergh High School Site Improvements, LUAll-012, SA-A Dear Mr. Medrud: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. You will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~-DJ~ Vanessa Dolbee Senior Planner cc: Rick Stracke -Renton School District #403 / Owner(s) Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • ~entonwa.gov p • ECT INFORMATION (conti id) City of Renton <.,-,+(J· or'/- 'cic•. ,Y,.,nt, ...,,,, ·, -I O!J i ..l/1,,,',.,. LAND USE PERMIT '·-'>l(}r i MASTER APPLICATIOtf!~it;r&11r1, ... 0 ·-~ !!j} PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Renton School District No. 403 Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements NAME: Rick Stracke -Executive Director Facilities & Operations 7812 South 1241 " Street PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ADDRESS: 16426128'" Avenue SE Renton, WA 98058 CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98178-4830 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER($): TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 204-4403 282305-9004-03, 282305-9042-07, 282305-9093-05 APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: Same as Property Owner High School COMPANY (if PROPOSED LAND USE($): applicable): High School EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: Residential Single Family PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ZIP: (if applicable): Not Applicable EXISTING ZONING: TELEPHONE NUMBER: R-8 CONT ACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Not Applicable SITE AREA (in square feet): 37.25 Acres (Total Site Area)/ NAME: Brad Medrud, AICP 5.37 Acres (Work Area) COMPANY (if SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE AHBL, Inc. DEDICATED: Not Applicable. applicable): 2215 North 30 1 " Street, Suite 300 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: Not Applicable. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: Tacoma ZIP: 98403 ACRE (if applicable): Not Applicable TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): (253) 383-2422 / bmedrud@ahbl.com Not Applicable PR, :CT INFORMAT ION (contin I) NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): Not Applicable NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $3,000,000 Not Applicable SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS (if applicable): Not Applicable ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): Not Applicable D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): None D FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 228,972 SF D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. applicable): Not Applicable -No Change in Existing Building Areal D SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): No Change in the Number D WETLANDS 9,772 sq. ft. of Existing Emplo~ees LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach leaal description on separate sheet with the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION 28 , TOWNSHIP 23N , RANGE 05E , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Site Plan Review 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ PF IECT INFORMATION (conti id) I AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I I, (Print Name/s) Brad Medrud , declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one)_ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _X_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /j ( .:J /;t,, liJ ~ A signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be hislherltheir free and / .-1.__/ \... voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of Owner/Representative) Parcel A: Notary (Print) Jo , (, T /j,, // My appointment expires: si S / ( ; I Legal Description: THE EAST 500 FEET OF THE NORTH 1121 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel B: THE EASTERLY 330 FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY 216.47 FEET, MORE OR LESS, OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel C: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; LESS THE EAST 500 FEET OF THE NORTH 1121 FEET; LESS THE EAST 330 FEET OF THE SOUTH 216.47 FEET; LESS THE SOUTH 250 FEET OF THE EAST 523 FEET OF THE WEST 553 FEET; AND, LESS COUNTY ROADS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton Community & Economic Development Renton City Hall -6th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057-3232 Date: Project No.: Task No.: Project Name: March 10, 2011 210299.30 31 Renton School District - Lindbergh High School Site Improvements Tel: (425) 430-7314 Fax: (425) 430-7300 Subject: Original Master Application Email: vdolbee@rentonwa.gov WE ARE SENDING: NO. COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 3/8/11 Original Signed copy of Land Use Permit Master Application THESE ARE SENT VIA: C'2J Mail D FedEx D Courier THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: Form C'2l For your review and comment D For your use D For approval Signed: /\ b-\ /}v'~J\._J Signature Brad Medrud AICP Printed Name Senior Planning Project Manager Title IZI Tacoma D Seattle D Spokane Q:\2010\210299\JO_PLN\Deliverab/es_By_Date\Site Plan Review D Client Pick-up D Hand Delivered by AHBL D Other: D Reviewed as noted C'2l As requested Appllcation\031 O 11 _LU _Permlt_Master _Appl!catlon_Letter _of_ Transmittal_ 210299 .docx Page 1 of 1 Civil Engineers Stmctural Engineers Landscape Architects Community Planners Natural Resource Ecologists Land Surveyors Neighbors TACOMA 1215 North 311' Street Surte 300 Tacomo, WA 9840~3350 253.3831422 --, 253.383.2572 c,, SEATTLE 1200 6•· Avenue Sole 1620 5€ottle, WA 98101-3117 206.267.2425 ,[L 206.267.2429 ·'X www.ahbl.com PLANNING DIVISION WAIVE .. .)F SUBMITTAL REQUIF ...... VIENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS •wooss#e~MifSOBMltrAL ?}i?t t:wAiVEPY NIOOIFiED • , ·):•~g®/RijM~~f~; ;'·'··· r rn ttt~ri?:•• (Iij&'i!) Calculations 1 Density Worksheet 4 "' 8ITJiH~$f891W~tti~~:,; ., Drainage Report 2 ¢i~~~1,~m~tfir1mi/®1~t~i/:Ml~#•: Environmental Checklist 4 •g~i~\iiji~f PAi~iimmt~iR~#Ar~~~:gffi?Y/h(:: : : ;; ) . Existing Easements {Recorded Copy) 4 , Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 ~~~ir~•R,~m; 8~#,,~~i: Habitat Data Report 4 Irrigation Plan 4 ~,m~·~FiHlri~~~~i#~irY.J~~P~~t~~®~~,!~~•••:••••••••:•:• Landscape Plan, Conceptual, ~i~~§~~:R!~m:•·p~\~ii~~;• :: •t >,-,.·.· · Legal Description 4 Master Application Form 4 M8~~M~rifM~IT~~:('9®R~fii18A~rn~rn;)\[•:•••:•:·,···········,··· Neighborhood Detail Map 4 B~~iii~;:gp/~t~r#ij1l~~r~~9@r~·fr~'Y~'~·~·•:•••• Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building PROJECT NAME L.ind ber'.[?b HS DATE: i2/i~"/1c10 ' 4. Planning H:\CED\Data\F orms-T emplates\Self-Help Handouls\Planning\waiverofs ubm ittalreqs. xls 06!09 & PLANNING DIVISION ' WAIVE1""0F SUBMITTAL REQUIRi:::1\IIENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Plat Name Reservation 4 Stream or Lake Study, Standard 4 ~irii~m:~(R~~1mi~ei::§ypei~rn~mi(ij1~•·••1 ••: 1 •···,·.,·········· Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 Traffic Study 2 ftr,~:8iWil~/~liii~9!~~rimij Ri~~ ~ ::••: •••••••••··•••·• ··•••·•·· ··· · Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 • gim\i~#R,~m::§~m~~'!#~pf ••• • ·· · · Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 rw~,~r~~M)!i~~tiiJmBimmi •mrmiifnm~fY:;••••••···· .. •••••··········· Wetlands ReporUDelineation 4 Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND, Inventory of Existing Sites 2 ANO 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 ANo 3 Map of View Area 2 ANO, Photosimulations 2 AND, This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building PROJECT NAME: l,. I ()c/ h1:~9h ti) ,/hJµf1)!/t?/J1tJ!i DATE IZ/ 1(a I 2(7/D ) ' 4. Planning H:\CEO\Data\F orms-T emplales\Self -Help Ha ndouts\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs_xls 06/09 \ City of Renton TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET 'I/(:'';[} ·' ,. •,, 1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1. _S-"--~=--°!_._ __ trees 2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 O Trees in proposed public streets Q Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts (2 Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers I 2.. trees trees trees trees Total number of excluded trees: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1: 2. 3. __ .... 1..,,2.~-trees -~S~l~J~-trees 4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4, multiply line 3 by: 0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, or R-8 0.1 in all other residential zones 0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. 113 trees ------ 5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing 5 to retain 4: 5. 5( l trees 6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: (If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required). 6. -(~3S) trees 7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 7. 0 inches 8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: l (Minimum 2' caliper ll'ees required) 8. 0 9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees6 : {if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next Mote number) inches per tree '· Measured at chest height. 9. 6 trees ------ 2 • Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified ari>ofis~ and approved by the City. :t Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, Hoodplalns and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). -'· Count only those trees ta be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. s.. The City may require modification ot the tree retcnUon plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a 11 • Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to crllical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site ~' are less than 6" but are greater than 2· can be used to meet lhe tree replacement requirement. H: Division/Forms/T reeRe:tcn.tion Worksheet t 1107 Lindbergh High School Site Improvements SPR submittal Construction Mitigation Description Proposed construction dates McGRANAHANarchiteets The project will be conducted in two phases. Phase 1 includes improvements to the Main Site Entry North, Visitor and Staff Parking, new Faculty Parking at the East, new sidewalks, and Emergency Vehicle access. Phase 1 of the proposed project will start construction in June 2011 with completion scheduled for the end of October 2011. Phase 2 will include improvements to the South (Student) Parking Lot and a new covered canopy at the bus-drop off area. Phase 2 will start in June 2012 and be completed by October 2012. Hours and days of operation Construction is proposed to occur Monday -Friday from 7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Contractor may elect to work Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. -5:00 p.m. Proposed hauling/transportation routes Hauling/transportation will occur along 128•h Ave SE. During Phase 1 of the project, construction access will be via the Main entry at the North portion of the site. During Phase 2 of the project, construction vehicle access will be via the South entry to the site/ student parking area. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust. traffic impacts, erosion. mud. noise. and other noxious characteristics A comprehensive storm drainage system will be installed in accordance with the City of Renton drainage requirements. Runoff will be mitigated by the use of approved storm water detention and water quality facilities. Runoff will be discharged to the existing downstream water system. Other mitigation measures include wheel brushing of hauling vehicles, and watering the site as necessary to minimize dust. Measures to mitigate traffic impacts include work is scheduled during the summer when students/staff arc on summer break as discussed in the preliminary traffic control plan below. Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (nights or weekends) Contractor may elect to work Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. ~ 5:00 p.m. Preliminary traffic control plan Construction will occur during the summer break, when students arc not in session. During Phase 1 of the proposed project, construction/hauling access will occur at the !\fain entry at the North whereas staff will access the school from tl1e South entry and park at the student parking lot. Pa~e l of 1 TO: FROM: DATE: PROJECT MEMO Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton Community and Economic Development Renton City Hall -5th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057-3232 Brad Medrud, AICP March 8, 2011 ,,:, <1, '-~/, /( PROJECT: OUR FILE NO.: Renton School District -Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements 210299.30, Task 31 SUBJECT: Project Narrative for Site Plan Review 1. Project name, size and location of site Project Name: Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements Site Location: 16426 -128th Avenue SE, Renton WA Parcel Numbers: 282305-9004, 282305-9042 and 282305-9093 Project Size: 37.25 Acres (Total Site Area)/ 5.37 Acres (Work Area) 2. Land use permits required for proposed project • SEPA Review and Determination • Site Plan Review Renton School District No. 403 City of Renton 3. Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties The City of Renton zoning designation of the project site is R-8. Adjacent Properties: • West -City of Renton: R-8 • East -King County: R-6 • North -King County: R-6 • South -City of Renton: R-8 and Resource Conservation 4. Current use of the site and any existing improvements Lindbergh High School is the current and proposed use of the site. Existing Site Improvements: High School buildings, portable classrooms, parking areas, drive lanes, playfelds, and running track Page 1 of 4 Civil Engineers Structural Engineers Landscape Architects Community Planners Natural Resource Ecologists Land Surveyors Neighbors TACOMA 1115 North 311'• llreet Suite300 Taroroo, WA 98-WJ-3350 253.3831422 TE:l 253.38315n FAX SEATTLE 1200 6h Averue Sule 1620 S,otde, WA 98101-JI 17 206.2672425 TEL 106.2671419 FAX SPOKANE 827 West First Avenue Suitelll Spokane, WA 99201-3912 5091525019 TEL 509.315.B862 FAX www.ahbf.com 5. Special site features (i.e. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes) Based on information derived through site reconnaissance and readily available documents in the Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report prepared by AHBL, Inc., revised February 2011, four category 3 wetland areas were identified on southern portion the school site. The four category 3 wetlands are the following sizes: • Wetland A-5,440 SF (on-site)/ 9,000 SF (total) • Wetland B -1,165 SF • Wetland C -1,399 SF • Wetland D -1,768 SF (on-site)/ Greater than 1 acre (total) In addition to the four identified wetlands, a constructed ditch designed and built as a stormwater facility was identified in the northwest portion of the site. The steepest slope on the site is approximately 34 percent, located between the softball and baseball fields on the west side of the property. 6. Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions The Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington, as depicted by the Web Soil Survey, was reviewed to determine the general nature of soils on the subject site. The site was determined to contain Alderwood and Everett soils. In addition, Associated Earth Sciences prepared a Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated February 10, 2010, that provides more information on the soils on the site. Coughlin Porter Lundeen prepared a storm drainage plan in accordance with the Oty of Renton requirements. Storm water runoff will be collected in existing and new catch basins, open water systems, downspouts, and area drains and conveyed to new water quality and run-off control facilities. The treated runoff will discharge to the existing downstream system. 7. Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development The existing use is a high school and is to remain unchanged. The site lighting will be replaced and updated, except there will not be any changes to the lighting on the existing fields. There will be no changes to the existing school beyond what is listed below and there will not be an increase in students or staff based on this work. The proposed project will include the following work in two phases: Phase 1: • Lower Parking Lot and Bus -Relocate bus drop off and pick up to South Parking Lot except for special needs buses, maintain emergency vehicle pathway, and locate lighted bollard in front of sky-bridge to keep vehicles from driving through. • Faculty Parking Lot -Provide additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility, repave existing facility and re-stripe. • New East Side Parking and Emergency Vehicle Access -Provide additional faculty parking on east side of school and enhance accessibility. Provide emergency vehicle access to east side of school and enhance building security. • Main School Site Entry North -Provide new left exiting turn lane along existing exit turn lane. Phase 1 of the proposed project will start in June 2011 with completion scheduled for the end of Project Memo Page 2 of 4 Renton School District -Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements 210299.30, Task 31 Mardi 8, 2011 mmm11 October 2011. Phase 2: • South Parking Lot -Relocate bus drop off and pick up, build a covered pedestrian waiting structure and covered walkway access, and repave the existing 210-stall parking lot and restripe. Phase 2 will start in June 2012 and be completed by October 2012. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of existing school district facilities. 8. For plats indicate the proposed number, net density and range of sizes (net lot area) of the new lots Not applicable to this application. 9. Access The high school is accessed currently by three entrances from 128th Avenue SE along the west side of the property. The existing northern site entrance will remain in the same location, but will be modified to include a left hand turn lane. The other two accesses will remain unchanged. 10. Proposed off-site improvements (i.e. installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.) No off-site improvements are proposed. 11. Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project Total estimated construction cost for the proposed project is $3,000,000 The fair market values for both are assumed equal to the estimated construction costs. 12. Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed There will be approximately 30,000 cubic yards of cut and approximately 15,000 cubic yards of fill anticipated on the project site. Fill will be sourced locally from an approved quarry, but the project contractor will determine specific location. 13. Number, type and size of any trees to be removed Some existing trees, shrubs and other landscaping will be removed as part of the proposed project improvements. The number, type and size are shown on our landscaping plans. We will be providing more landscaping as part of this project than would be required by the code. The trees in the knoll in the center of the current bus and student drop off will be removed to address the following safety concerns of the School District and the school principal: Project Memo Page 3 of 4 Renton School District -Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements 210299.30, Task 31 March 8, 2011 mmm11 • School officials need to be able to monitor the pickup and drop off area activity. Currently the knoll blocks sight lines across the pickup and drop off area. • School officials need be able to see the primary entrances to the gymnasium from the main school building. Currently it is not possible to see the entrances to the gymnasium from the main entry. • Currently parking along the pickup and drop off area needs to use the main travel way to enter and exit stalls. This creates a safety hazard for those cars, as well as those cars and buses that are picking up students. The new parking arrangement will separate the parking from the access way. 14. Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City No land will be dedicated to the City. 15. Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes There will be up to two temporary job shacks on the site. 16. Any proposed modifications being requested (include written justification) No modifications are proposed. 17. For projects located within 100 feet of a stream or wetland, please include, distance in feet from the wetland or stream to the nearest area of work Proposed work on the south parking lot (Phase 2) will be within 200 feet of Wetland A, but outside of the wetland and its Category 3 associated buffer of 25 feet. 18. For projects located within 200-feet of Black River, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, May Creek and Lake Washington please include the following additional information: Distance from closest area of work to the ordinary high water mark. Not applicable to this application. Description of the nature of the existing shoreline Not applicable to this application. The approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view in the event the proposed project exceeds a height of 35-feet above the average grade level Not applicable to this application. c: Calvin Gasaway, Green-Gasaway Architects Tom Marshall, McGranahan Architects Q:\2010\210299\30_PLN\Dehverables_By_Date\Site Plan Review Application\20110308_Project_Narrative_Memo_210299 30_Revised_Final.docx Project Memo Page 4 of 4 Renton School District -Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements 210299.30, Task 31 Marcil 8, 2011 mmm11 heff1on t r a n s o r ta t I o n I n c. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Project: Lindbergh High School Site Improvement Project Subject: Review of North Access Driveway Date: February 24, 2011 Author: {~ j,t; f:;' , >, . ... ,. ~?/t, //II;,;, .. • "1 >/ I r;;: ii'i'i .f::.) lf::!/ This memorandum presents the results ofa site access review for the Renton School District's proposed site improvements at the existing Lindbergh High School campus. 1. Project Description Lindbergh High School is located at 16426 -128th Avenue SE in Renton. The District is proposing site improvements that will not increase students or staff. The improvements would relocate school bus loading/unloading to the south parking area ( except for special needs buses), would reconfigure parking in the site; and would widen the northernmost access driveway to provide separate left-and right-tum pockets for exiting traffic. The project is expected to be complete by October 2012. The driveway would be widened to the north, which would not change the location of the driveway's existing southern curb. The proposed widening is shown on the attached figure. The existing driveway serves primarily school buses and staff, but is used by others (parents and students) regularly. Although the site improvements will relocate school buses to the southern access driveway, the changes may increase usage of the northern driveway by visitors. 2. Acess Review Since the project proposes minor revisions to the northernmost access, the City requested a review of the changes including a review of intersection sight distance. 2.1. Traffic Operations The widening to provide separate left-and right-tum pockets on the driveway approach will improve site access operations. Currently, drivers turning right from the driveway onto 128"' Avenue SE can be delayed by a single driver waiting to turn left onto 128'" Avenue SE. With the widening and the two exiting lanes, this delay potential would be removed and drivers will be able to make turns without being delayed by others on the same approach. 2.2. Sight Distance Sight distance from the existing northern driveway is somewhat limited by a crest vertical curve to the south of the access point. Sight distance measurements were performed at the site in February 2011 using guidelines published by the American Association of State Highways and Transportation 6544 NE 61st Street, Seattle, WA 98115 Phone: (206) 523-3939 Fax: (206) 5234949 Lindbergh High Schoo e Improvement Project Review of North Access Driveway herr'ron t r a n s o r t a t I o n I n c. Officials (AASHTO). Its publication-A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Street/- provides guidance on stopping and intersection sight distance for stop-controlled intersections. Measurements were performed at the driveway at a point 14 feet from the edge of the traveled way on 128'h Avenue NE. The height of the driver's eye (3.5 feet) and the height ofan approaching vehicle (4.5 feet) were also considered. Sight distance to the south was measured to be 315 feet; sight distance to the north is unobstructed and is clear to the all-way-stop controlled intersection with SE 164'h Street-approximately 235 feet. The recommended stopping sight distance for a 25 mph roadway is 155 feet.2 Therefore, the existing access driveway provides more than the minimum stopping sight distance in both directions. AASHTO also provides guidance for intersection sight distance. These distances are recommended for smooth operations of the intersection, such that drivers turning onto a major roadway do not cause drivers on the major roadway to slow. The recommended intersection sight distance for left turns onto a 25 mph roadway is 280 feet; the recommended intersection sight distance for right turns onto a 25 mph roadway is 240 feet.3 The sight distance to the south is adequate for turns in both directions. The distance to the all-way-stop intersection is less than the 280 feet of sight distance recommended for a 25 mph roadway. However, since vehicles approaching the driveway from the north would be accelerating from a stop at SE l 64'h Street and are visible from the site access, the sight distance value associated with the 25 mph roadway is not applicable. Turning vehicles are likely moving at 15 mph or less; the recommended intersection sight distances for left turns onto 15 or 20 mph roadways are 170 and 225 feet, respectively.' Therefore, the existing driveway also provides adequate intersection sight distance to the north. The slight widening of the driveway is not expected to alter the sight distance findings. 3. Findings and Conclusions • The widening to provide separated left-and right-turn pockets on the driveway approach will improve site access operations. • The existing and proposed widened driveway provides more than the minimum stopping sight distance in both directions. • The existing and proposed widened driveway provides more than the minimum intersection sight distance based on the conditions of the vicinity roadway system. Attachment: Proposed Site Driveway Widening Plan TSM/tsm Lindbergh HS Access Review -FINAL doc:,; 1 American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. 2 AASHTO, Exhibit 9-55. 3 Ibid. 4 Ibid. -2 -February 24, 2011 Lindbergh High School Proposed Site Improvement Project Driveway Widening Plan DUMPSTER AREA - RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT AL CHECKLIST FORM Applicant Renton School District #403 7812 South 124th Street Seattle,\VA 98178-4830 Project: Lindbergh High School Site Improvements FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Lindbergh High School -Site Improvements 2. Name of applicant Renton School District No. 403 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owner: Renton School District No. 403 7812 South 124th Street Seattle, WA 98178-4830 Phone: ( 425) 204-4403 Rick Stracke -Executive Director Facilities & Operations Contact: Brad Medrud, Agent for the School District SEP A Process AHBL, Inc. 2215 North 30th Street, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98403 Phone: (253) 383-2422 E-mail: bmedrud@ahbl.com 4. Date checklist prepared: February 4, 2011 5. Agency requesting checklist Renton School District 6. Proposed timing or Schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Phase 1 of the proposed project will start in June 2011 with completion scheduled for the end of October 2011. Phase 2 will start in June 2012 and be completed by October 2012. SEP A Environmental Checklist -Page 2 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No additional plans or further related activities are anticipated at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal • Technical Information Report, prepared by Coughlin Porter Lundeen, dated February 2011 • Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report, prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, dated February 10, 2010 • Wetland Delineation and Wildlife Habitat Report, prepared by AHBL, dated September 2010, Revised February 2011 • Heating Oil UST Soil Assessment Final Report, prepared by EHS- Intemational, Inc., dated December 29, 2009 • ALTA Survey, prepared by ESM, dated August 2010 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There are no other applications affecting this property. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • SEPA Review and Determination Renton School District No. 403 • Site Plan Review City of Renton • Demolition Permit City of Renton • Building (and Grading) Permit City of Renton • Electrical Permit City of Renton • NPDES Permit (if the disturbed area exceeds one acre) WA State Department of Ecology SEP A Environmental Checklist -Page 3 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The existing site is approximately 37.25 acres. The total project work area is approximately 8 acres. The existing use is a high school and is to remain unchanged. The site lighting will be replaced and updated, except there will not be change lighting to the existing fields. There will be no changes to the existing school beyond what is listed below and there will not be an increase in students or staff based on this work. Project will include the following two phases: Phase 1: • Lower Parking Lot and Bus -Relocate bus drop off and pick up to South Parking except for special needs buses, maintain emergency vehicle pathway, and locate lighted bollard in front of sky-bridge to keep vehicles from driving through. • Faculty Parking Lot -Provide additional parking adjacent to existing parking facility, repave existing facility and re-stripe. • New East Side Parking and Emergency Vehicle Access -Provide additional faculty parking on east side of school and enhance accessibility. Provide emergency vehicle access to east side of school and enhance building security. • Main School Site Entry North -Provide new left exiting turn lane along existing exist turn lane. Phase 1 of the proposed project will start in June 2011 with completion scheduled for the end of October 2011. Phase 2: • South Parking Lot -Relocate bus drop off and pick up, build a covered SEPA Environmental Checklist -Page 4 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form pedestrian waiting structure and covered walkway access, and repave the existing 210-stall parking lot and restripe. Phase 2 will start in June 2012 and be completed by October 2012. The project is intended to improve the safety and quality of existing school district facilities. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to underiitand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located at 16426-128th Avenue SE, Renton, WA on King County parcel numbers 282305-9004-03, 282305-9042-07 and 282305-9093-05 in the NE Quarter of Section: 28, Township: 23 N, Range: 05 E. Legal Description Parcel A: THE EAST 500 FEET OF THE NORTH 1121 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel B: THE EASTERLY 330 FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY 216.47 FEET, MORE OR LESS, OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SEPA Environmental Checklist -Page 5 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form Parcel C: THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; LESS THE EAST 500 FEET OF THE NORTH 1121 FEET; LESS THE EAST 330 FEET OF THE SOUTH 216.47 FEET; LESS THE SOUTH 250 FEET OF THE EAST 523 FEET OF THE WFST 553 FEET; AND, LESS COUNTY ROADS SEPA Environmental Checklist -Page 6 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Fonn B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope on the site is approximately 34 percent, located between the softball and baseball fields on the west side of the property. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington, as depicted by the Web Soil Survey, was reviewed to determine the general nature of soils on the subject site. The site was determined to contain Alderwood and Everett soils. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, there are no indications of unstable soil in the vicinity. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be approximately 30,000 cubic yards of cut and approximately 15,000 cubic yards of fill anticipated on the project site. Fill will be sourced locally from an approved quarry, bot the project contractor will determine specific location. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, erosion could occur because of clearing and construction. However, the implementation of a temporary sediment and erosion control plan using Best Management Practices should mitigate impacts. SEPA Environmental Checklist -Page 7 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Fonn g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? It is anticipated that approximately 35 percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after the completion of the proposed improvements. The existing impervious surface coverage is approximately 29 percent of the site. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The proposal will follow the stormwater management design criteria outlined in the City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual and erosion and sediment control plans will be developed in accordance with the standards referenced by the City of Renton. These measures include stockpile covering, catch basin protection, silt fence, construction exit, and temporary construction runoff storage facilities. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? H any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction activities at the site could stir up dust particles. Construction vehicles and equipment will also be a potential source of exhaust emissions. After project completion, the primary sources and amounts of emissions will be the same as they are now. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? H so, generally describe. There are no known off-site sources of emissions or odors observed that might effect this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Watering the ground as needed before and during clearing and grading SEPA Environmental Checklist -Page 8 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form activities will control dust particles. Vehicles that are not being used in construction activities will be shut off. 3. WATER a. Surface Water 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Based on the information derived through site reconnaissance and readily available documents, four wetland areas were identified on southern portion the school site and one constructed ditch designed and built as a stormwater facility was identified in the northwest portion of the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Work on the south parking lot will be within 200 feet of Wetland, but outside of the wetland and its Category 3 associated buffer of 25 feet. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. According to Panel 53033C0983F of the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program's Flood Insurance Rate Maps, proposed project does not appear to lie SEP A Environmental Checklist -Page 9 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist F onn within a 100-year flood plain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? H so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No water will be withdrawn from or discharged to groundwater. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be discharged into the ground. The site is connected to sanitary sewer. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? H so, describe. A storm drainage plan will be prepared in accordance with the City of Renton requirements. Storm water runoff will be collected in catch basins, open water systems, downspouts, and area drains and conveyed to water quality and runoff control facilities. The treated runoff will discharge to the downstream system. SEPA Environmental Checklist-Page JO FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? ff so, generally describe. There is a potential for waste material to enter the surface waters. Pollutants from automobiles and buses could also enter ground and surface waters if not handled properly. The proposed site improvements do not propose any waste materials to enter ground or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A comprehensive storm drainage system will be installed in accordance with the City of Renton drainage requirements.· Runoff will be mitigated by the use of approved storm water detention and water quality facilities. Runoff will be discharged to the existing downstream storm water system. 4. PLANTS a. Check or underline types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: ash, cottonwood evergreen tree: fu, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: red osier dogwood, salmonberry, bentgrass. giant horsetail, and soft rush water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation: iyy, blackberry b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some existing trees, shrubs and other landscaping will be removed as part of the proposed project improvements. SEPA Environmental Checklist -Page 11 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site, if any: To our knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered plant species on or near the project site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A landscape plan reviewed and approved by the City of Renton will be prepared for the project. 5. ANIMALS a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, small rodents, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No. c. Is the site part of a migration route? ff so, explain. The site is located within the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used for new and replaced site lighting. The improvements will not significantly add to the energy use on the site. SEP A Environmental Checklist -Page 12 F1NAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List of other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: No special measures are proposed. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Typical fire, police, and ambulance services may be necessary if there is an accident or fire. The need for these types of services will not be increased due to the proposed improvements at the high school. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, aircraft, other? None. SEP A Environmental Checklist -Page 13 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Fonn 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the _project on a short-term or a long· term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indica,te what hours noise would come from the site. · Temporary, short-term noise impacts typical of construction projects will occur with operation of equipment during construction. Construction will normally occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. subject to City of Renton ordinances. Long-term noises associated with existing high school use at the site will continue to occur, however the noise level generated by the proposed improvements will not be any greater than the existing noise level at the site. These noise impacts are consistent with existing land use in the vicinity. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Noise impacts associated with construction phases of the project will be limited in duration. To mitigate general noise impacts during the construction phases, measures such as using and regularly maintaining efficient mufflers and quieting devices on all construction equipment and vehicles will be taken. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Lindbergh High School currently occupies the site. Current uses of adjacent properties include the following: East: Single family residential North: Single family residential South: Elementary School and church West 128th Avenue SE and Single family residential b. Has the site been used for agriculture? H so, describe. No. SEP A Environmental Checklist -Page 14 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Fonn c. Describe any structures on the site. There are structures associated with the existing high school, including the main classroom building and gymnasium. d. Will any structures be demolished? ff so, what? None. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The City of Renton zoning designation of the project site is R-8. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The City of Renton comprehensive plan designation is Residential Single Family. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? ff so, specify. Yes. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? There will be no change in the number of students or staff. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No one will be displaced as a result of the proposed project. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. There are no displacement impacts. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project will be designed to comply with applicable regulations. SEPA Environmental Checklist -Page 15 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? The proposed project will not include the addition of any new housing units. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: There are no special measures proposed. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of the proposed walkway structure is approximately15 feet The walkway structure will be a steel structure with a metal roof. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. The proposed improvements will not result in any views being altered significantly. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: No special measures are proposed. SEPA Environmental Checklist-Page 16 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Fonn 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Except for the field lights, the existing exterior building and site lights at the high school will be replaced as part of this project The proposal does not include any glare beyond that which currently exists at the high school. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Although the existing high school lights are visible, they do not pose a safety hazard or interfere with views from off-site locations. New light fixtures proposed will not be a safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: No special measures are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are sports fields located on the high school site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. The proposed project will not displace any recreational uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: There are no special measures proposed. SEPA Environmental Checklist -Page 17 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. To our knowledge, no such objects exist near the site. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site? To our knowledge, no such objects exist near the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: If cultural or archeological objects are found during site preparation work, the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation will be notified, and appropriate measures will be taken. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The high school is currently accessed by three accesses from 128"' Avenue SE. The northern existing site entrance will be modified to include a left hand turn lane. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The closest public transit stop (Route 148*) is located north of the high school at the comer of 128th Avenue Southeast and Southeast 164"' Street and is operated by King County Metro Transit. c. How may parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? There are currently approximately 342 existing parking spaces on the project SEPA Environmental Checklist-Page 18 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Fonn site. With the proposed changes, the site parking will be reduced by eight to twelve stalls. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). There will not be any new roads or streets proposed because of the project. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. There will not be any new vehicular trips beyond what is generated by the existing use. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: No special measures are proposed. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: There will not be any increased need for public services beyond that which already exist. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No special measures are proposed. SEPA Environmental Checklist· Page 19 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form 16. UTILITIES a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. . Construction activities will include trenching and excavating to repair the existing stormwater system and upgrading some of the existing fire hydrants. No other utility work is planned. Water (Fire): Water (Domestic): Electrical: Telephone: Sewer: Cable: Soos Creek Water Soos Creek Water Puget Sound Energy Qwest Soos Creek Sewer Comcast SEPA Environmental Checklist -Page 20 FINAL VERSION -February 4, 2011 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT Environmental Checklist Form C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: --~----''--~-·---=------=------- BradMedrud~agentfor Renton School District No. 403 Date submitted: February 4, 2011 SEP A Environmental Checklist -Page 21 DESCRIPTION The classic lines and sophisticated construction of Vision Site LED makes it an ideal complement to site design. Offering LED technology across the VXS and VXM, Vision provides true family scaling in both physical form and lumen capability for architectural site lighting applications. UL and cUL listed for use in wet locations. SPECIFICATION FEATURES Construction HOUSING: Heavy wall, one piece die-cast aluminum housing has precise tolerance control and repeatability in manufacturing. Housing features a partition wall that isolates driver components for coater operation. lntegrel aluminum heat sink provides superior heat transfer in +40°C ambient environment. DOOR: One- piece die-cast aluminum construction with toolfess release latch. Door swings down and is retained on two (2) catch hinges. GASKET: Continuous gasket provided to seal housing to optic tray. LENS: Downlight lens is LED board integrated acrylic over- optics, each individually sealed for IP66 rating. HARDWARE:Toolless release button latches are stainless steel/aluminum construction, painted to match housing and allows access to internal housing and electrical components. Optics DISTRIBUTION: Choice of fifteen l15J high efficiency AccuLED optical systems, featuring patented designs that maximize light collection and directional distribution onto the application region. Each optical lens is precision manufactured via injection molding then precisely arranged and sealed on the board media. LED's: High output LED's, 50,000+ hours life at >70% lumen DIMENSIONS maintenance, offered standard in 4000°K i+I-275K) CCT and >70 CRI. LightBAR optic tray is able to rotate 360° in 90° increments for specific placement of the distribution relative to fixture, Electrical DRIVER: LED drivers are potted and heat sunk for optimal performance and prolonged life. Standard drivers feature electronic universal voltage (120-277V/50-60hzL greater than 0.9 power factor, less than 20% harmonic distortion and feature ambient temperature range of +40°C (104°F) down to minimum starting temperature of .30°c {- 22"'F). Shipped standard with Cooper Lighting proprietary circuit module designed to withstand 10kV of transient line surge. All LED LightBARS™ and drivers are mounted to dedicated mounting trays and are easily replaced by use of quick disconnects for ease of wiring. Driver tray is hinged and removable without the use of tools. Options to control light levels, energy savings and egress capabilities (battery pack and separate circuit) are available. Mounting ARM: One-piece extruded aluminum arm available in standard 6" and 10" lengths. Internal bolts guides allow easy positioning of fixture during installation to pole or wait surface. r J178mm] 25' POLE STRUCTURAL MOUNT: Die-cast aluminum cleat factory mounted to luminaire and finished in luminaire color. Stainless steel structural rod measures 1/2" in diameter and is provided in luminaire finish color or optional natural finish. Product works in conjunction with dedicated accessory arms !ordered seperately). lnvue poles are provided pre-drilled when structural mount option drill pattern is specified. See lnvue poles section for complete selection. Additional mounting accessories available. Finish Housing is finished in 5 stage super premiumTGIC polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness for superior protection against fade and wear. LightBAR'"' cover plates are standard white and may be specified to match finish of luminaire housing. Standard colors include black, bronze, grey, white, dark platinum and graphite metallic. RAL and custom color matches available. Consult Outdoor Architectural Colors brochure for a complete selection. Warranty VXM LED features a 5 year limited wa,ranli:1tv of Renton :.:}L-w 1L19 o:vision L___,r 1432 mm)•·__J \V}~ L-------28' 1724 mm]~-------'--r1 -~ 6" or 10" {152 mm or 254 mm] ,,,, COOPER Lighting www.eooperlighti ng.eom INVUE® •~'."'.Y Type PL.A1 Date VXM VISION SITE MEDIUM LED 1 -6 LightBARS Solid State LEO ARCHITECTURAL LED AREA/SITE LUMINAIRE Sustainabl-lH>esign CERTIFICATION DATA 40°C AmbientTemperature Rating UL and cUL Listed ISO 9001 IP66 LlghtBARS ARRA Compliant LM79 / LM80 Compliant 1.5G Vibration Tested ENERGY DATA Electronic LED Driver ::.0.9 Power Factor <20% Total Harmonic rnstortion 120-277V/50 & 60hi, 347V/60h2, 480V/60hz -30°C Minimum Temperature EPA EffectWe Projected Area: (Sq. Ft.) Single: -1.6 (max.I Single Structural: -1.82 (max I SHIPPING DATA Approximate Net Weight: 51 lbs. (23.18 kgs.) AVU092102 pc 2010-11-04 09:19:14 VXM VISION SITF MEDIUM Ll:D POWERANDLUMENS BY BAR COUNT #of System Type SL2 Type Sl3 Type SL4 Type 5WQ Ambient lumen ··~ Watts lumens Lumens lumens Lumens Temperature Multiplier 1 Bar 26 1.626 1,724 1,677 2 Bars 53 3,252 3,447 3,354 3 Bars 8-0 4,878 5,170 5,031 4 Bars 103 6,504 6,894 6,708 5 Bars 129 8,130 8,617 8,385 6 Bars 156 9,837 10,426 10,146 NOTE: lumen values based uµon 4000K CCT, 350mA drive current, 25°C ambient operating temperature. MOUNTING VARIATIONS Wall Mount Arm Mount Single EPA 1.6 Arm Mount 2 @ 180" EPA 3.2 1_.~~--lO'C 1.04 3,735 15'C 1.03 25'C 1.00 5,602 40'C 0.96 7.469 9,337 11,228 Arm Mount 2 @ 900 Ann Mount J @ 120" Arm Mount J @ 90" Arm Mount 4 @ 90" EPA J.2 !Round Pole Onlyl EPA4.5 EPA 4.5 EPA 5.55 A r_,,(-i I -- POLE DRILLING PATTERNS AND MOUNTING OPTIONS TypeM ---~~ 2 5f16" 159mm] G-i=i:::l. ______ 314" (20mm) Dia. Hole 2 7/16" !124mm] /-~-(215/B" [16mm] Dia. Holes Structural Mount TypeG 5116" famml Dia. Hole 3/4" 0mm] 718" mm] 314" [20mm] Dia. Hole Mast Arm Adapter 0 L ,1,. J [134mm] Fits 2 318" [61mm] O.D. Tenon MOUNTING OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES Extruded Arm Direct Mount (Round or Square Pole) ,,,, COOPER Lighting Struclural Pole Mount (Round or Square Pole) Direct Wall Mount Kit Structrual Wall Mount Wall Bracket with Arm NOTE. Specific.,lions and dimensio11s suhJ"ci 1o diange without nct,ce Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com Mast Arm Adapter 12" 0 [305 mm " I Top Cap Se< Screws L " '-~ Tenon Adapter www.coopetlighting.com Customer First Cemer 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 AVU092102 pc 2010-11-04 09:19:14 2010-11-04 09: 11 ·os VXM VISION SITF MEDIUM U:D ORDERING INFORMATION :-;:-,,::;:; ;.~ ~~Lli:-:-~-,-e-LOig 11,h_l -----~-~-:-~h-la_;_J, "'----~ ,-"" '--~-:c::c:-~---,:a-,1-~,PILt-io-Tn",,==,~ "==============---:-:"-,-:-:.:-~·.-!e-=:-.. -~-m-i_m_S,_oa_"_'_"_, ___ __,1 Emi1ting Diodes AP=Grey PRCPS=Slrut Rod and Clevis Set for • MA10!11·XX,::10" Arm for Sg .. a,e Po1012 Number of Lightbars Ao1=1 Bar Voltage ez=Bronze Square Pole (Painted to match MA1052.xx,,,s" Arm for Roo..-.J Pole fixture, does not include arm) Ao2=2 Bars E1=Electronic (120-27N) 347=347\I WH=White PRCCS=Stainless Strut Rod ;md Clevis Set4 MA1on.xx,.10· Arm lor Round Pole1i op=Oark Platinum ror Square Pole (Clevis painted to MA10!'4-XX=Wall 6rad(etwl1h6" Arm13 GM=Graphite Metallic match fixture, does no1 include MA1056-XX=D1r0ct Mount 1or Square Pole arm) MA10!17·XX' D;rect Moun! fO< Round Pole A03' 3 Bars 480' 480V A04°4 Bars AO!I' 5 Bars A06' 6Bars Dl*tribuiion T2'Typell T3•Type!II T4•Type1V SMO' TypeV Square Medium !IWO' Type V Square Wide 5X0' Type V Square Wide SMR' Type V Round Medium SWR' Type V Round Wide RW' Rectangular Wide SL2"Type II w/Spill Control Sl3"Type Ill w/Spill Control SL4=Type IV w/Spill Control SLL"'90 Degree Spill Liglt Eliminator Lefl SLR=90 Degree S~II Light Eliminator Righi Nates: 1 Arm nOI inc!ud.d. Drdar aepan,lal.,-. S..e aocr,norie• Standard 4000 II; CCT and gree1arthan 70 CAI. Cuslom end RAl color matching available upon fe,quest. Conaul1 you, cuolomu Hrvice ••P••an1Bliva for lurthar ,nformet,on Comp.o~bte wilh 10" MA1051 um only Compatible with 10" MA1 053 arm only. Well mount rrtruc1ual opt,ono do no1 include um assembly jSae Accaucriu) Compatible wo1h 10" MA12Jl arm ont.,. Add H suffis in the ardar shown lDW·laval output ve,ie; by be, count. Conoull lactory Raqu""" quant<ty tv,o or more Ligh!BARS. Con wit cu..io.....,, 1ervice tor le rod limn and lumen multiplier. 10 Avail~ble wi1h A01, A02, AOJ, <If A04 conf1gurll1ion• only. Specify 120 or 277V. LFO ""'Id weather integral battary paclc •• ,..red for minimum <lf)e•a1mg 1ampa,atu,a ..ol'F (-20-CI. DP9rBIH (1) lightbar for 90 minu\811. minimum 1300 mital luman•. Not rrv1ilable in all configuration•. consult factory. Rated for lite in 25•c ambient .. Aveilabla wi1h SL2, SLJ. 6WO. ~WR. 5MQ end 6MR 0p1,c,; only. 11 Drda, .. par1tat.,.. replace XX with col of 1uffix 12 UN whMt maunting fi><1ure ha.ds at 90' inc,amen18. t! For UH in downligh1ing •pplic.olions only 14 lncfudn arm only. MUS'! tpecify WRCP or WRCS in fixture ordering log,c. Down hght only. PRCPR 0 Strul Rod and Clevis Set for ~ MA1201.xx, D;rectWa! Moon1 K,tu Round Pole (Painted to ma1ch MA1207.xx, Mast Arm Adapter fix!~e. does not include arm) MAU;tl-XX• VXM Struaural MoontWatl Mount i. PRCCR' Stainless Strut Rod and Clevis Sets Arm for Round Pole (Clevis painted to MA1D17-XX• Single.am, Teoon Adapter lor 2 3/8" match fixture, does not included o D Tenoo arm) MA101a..xx, 2@1BO Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 lhllJl!!tHm 311:" DD. T""'°" WRCP' Strut Rod and Clevis Set (Painted a MA 1019-XX: 3@120 Degree Terion Adap1er f0< 2 to match fixture, does not include 311:" D.D. Tenon arm) MA1045-XX' 4@90 Deg,.,.. TenonAdapterfor2 J/8" D.D. Tenon WRCS Stainless Steel Stru1 Rod and 8 Clevis Sel (Clevis· painted 10 match MA1048-xx, ~~-~-~:;,enon Adapter 1or 2 fiXlure, does not include arm) Options 7 T=Terminal Block PC"'Butlon Type Photocell (specify voltage) R=NEMA Photocontrol Receptacle 2L =Bi·leW!I Switching• LCF=LightBAR Cover Plate Matches Housing Finish 7060=70 CRll6DOOK CCT• ICB=lntegral Cold Weather Battery ,o Pack (Specify 120 or 277) MA 1115-XX 3@90 Degr"" Teoon Adapter lor 2 318" D.D. Tenon MA111e-xx· 2@120 Degreo Tenon Adapter for 2 318"D.D Tenon MA1010.XX:Singla-a,m Tenon Adapter k>< 3 112'" D.D. Tenon MA1011-XX=2@180 Degroo Tanon Adapter for 3 112" 0.0. T,;,non MA1012·XXca3@120 Deg,oo Tenon Adapter for 3 112"0.D Terion MA10U-XX=4@91) Degr,;,e Tenon Adapter for 3 112"0.D Tenon MA1014-XX=2@90 Deg,"" Tenon Adapter for 3 112"D.D. Tar.on MA1015-XX=2@t20 Degree Tonon Adapte, for 3 112"D.D Tenon MA101G-XX=3@90O..gt"" Tenon Adapter for 3 112·00. Tenon OAIRA10111=NEMA Phorocontrot. Multi-Tap 0AIIIA1027=NEMA 1-'hotoconlrol • 4-SOV OAIRA1201 :NEMA Photocontrot • 3~N MA 1 253= 10kV Circuit Module Replacement ,,,, COOPER Lighting NOTE: Spec,f,cat,ons and d;me~sion, subject 10 di~nge wi1hou1 notice. Visit our web site at www.cDDperlighting.com www.cooperlighting.co m Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 AVU092102 pc 2010-11-04 09:19:14 2010-11-04 09 11 :05 0D_,E_:S_:C::_R::_IP'--T°'l_:O::_N:_ _______ ~--____________ _ The classic lines and sophisticated construction of Vision Site LED makes it an ideal complement to site design. Offering LED technology across the VXS and VXM, Vision provides true family scaling in both physical form and lumen capability for architectural site lighting applications. UL and cUL listed for use in wet locations. SPECIFICATION FEATURES Construction HOUSING: Heavy wall, one piece die-cast aluminum housing has precise tolerance control and repeatability in manufacturing. Housing features a partition wall that isolates driver components for cooler operation. lntegrel aluminum heat sink provides superior heat transfer in +40°C ambient environment. DOOR: One- piece die-cast aluminum construction with toolless release latch. Door swings down and is retained on two {21 catch hinges. GASKET: Continuous gasket provided to seal housing to optic tray. LENS: Downlight lens is LED board integrated acrylic over- optics, each individually sealed for IP66 rating. HARDWARE:Toolless release button latches are stainless steel/aluminum construction, painted to match housing and allows access to internal housing and electrical components. Optics DISTRIBUTION: Choice of fifteen (15) high efficiency AcculED optical systems, featuring patented designs that maximize light collection and directional distribution onto the application region. Each optical lens is precision manufactured via injection molding then precisely arranged and sealed on the board media. LED's: High output LED's, 50,000+ hours life at >70% lumen maintenance, offered standard in 4000°K (+/-275K) CCT and >70 CAI. LightBAR optic tray is able to rotate 360° in 90° increments for specific placement of the distribution relative to fixture. Electrical DRIVER: LED drivers are potted and heat sunk for optimal performance and prolonged life. Standard drivers feature electronic universal voltage (120-277V/50-60hz), greater than 0.9 power factor, less than 20% harmonic distortion and feature ambient temperature range of +40°C (104°F) down to minimum starting temperature of-30°C (- 220F). Shipped standard with Cooper Lighting proprietary circuit module designed to withstand 10kV of transient line surge. All LED lightBARS"'" and drivers are mounted to dedicated mounting trays and are easily replaced by use of quick disconnects for ease of wiring. Driver tray is hinged and removable without the use of tools. Options to control light levels, energy savings and egress capabilities (battery pack and separate circuit) are available. Mounting ARM: One-piece extruded aluminum arm available in standard 6" and 10" lengths. Internal bolts guides allow easy positioning of fixture during installation to pole or wall surface. 25' POLE STRUCTURAL MOUNT: Die-cast aluminum cleat factory mounted to luminaire and finished in luminaire color. Stainless steel structural rod measures 1/2" in diameter and is provided in luminaire finish color or optional natural finish. Product works in conjunction with dedicated accessory arms (ordered seperately). lnvue poles are provided pre-drilled when structural mount option drill pattern is specified. See lnvue poles section for complete selection. Additional mounting accessories available. Finish Housing is finished in 5 stage super premium TGIC polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness for superior protection against fade and wear. LightBAR-'" cover plates are standard white and may be specified to match finish ofluminaire housing. Standard colors include black, bronze, grey, white, dark platinum and graphite metallic. RAL and custom color matches available. Consult Outdoor Architectural Colors brochure for a complete selection. Warranty VXM LED features a 5 year limited warranty. 0D~l~M~E~N=S~IO'-"N~S'------------------------------------------ ,. J178mm] l_17'. [432 mm]----L-------28" [724 mm]I-------~-~~ 6" or 10" [152 mm or 254 mm) ""' COOPER Lighting www.coope,ligh1ing.com INVUE® "'"'."'9Y Type PL.B1 VXM VISION SITE MEDIUM LED 1 • 6 LightBARS Solid State LED ARCHITECTURAL LEO AREA/SITE LUMINAIRE Sustainabl~esign CERTIFICATION DATA 40°C AmbientTempernture Rating UL and cUL Listed ISO 9001 !P66 LlghtBARS ARRA Compliant LM79 / LM80 Compliant 1.5G Vibration Tested ENERGY DATA Electronic LED Driver >0.9 Power Factor <20% Total Harmonic Distortion 120-277Vl50 & 60hz. 347V/60hz, 4BOV/60hz -30°C Minimum Temperature EPA Effective Projected A,ea: (Sq. Ft.) Single: -1.6 lmax.) Single Structural: -1.82 (max.) SHIPPING DATA Approximate Net Weight: 51 lbs. (23.18 kgs.) .a~ 1/-."-fll .... $1-0 AVU092102 pc 2010-11-04 09 19:14 VXM VISION SITE MEDIUM LED POWER ANO LUMENS BY BAR COUNT #of System Type Sl2 Type SL3 Type Sl4 Type 5WQ Ambient Lumen ··~ Watts Lu mens Lumens Lu mens Lumens Temperature Multiplier 1 Bar 26 1,626 1,724 1,677 2 Bars 53 3,252 3,447 3,354 3 Bars 80 4,878 5,170 5,031 4 Bars 103 6,504 6,894 6,708 5 Bars 129 8,130 8,617 8,385 6 Bars 156 9,837 10,426 10,146 NOTE: lumen values based upon 4000K CCT, 350mA drive current, 25"C ambient operating temperature. MOUNTING VARIATIONS Wall Mount Arm Mount Single Arm Mount 2 @ 180° EPA 1.6 EPA 3.2 1,866 ,o~c 1.04 3.735 15°C 1.03 25'C 1.00 5,602 40"C 0.96 7.469 9,337 --- 11,228 Arm Mount 2 @ 90° Arm Mount 3 @ 120• Arm Mount 3 @ 90" Arm Mount 4 @ 90" EPA 3.2 lRound Pole Only) EPA 4.5 EPA 5.55 EPA 4.5 ~ ~ J A r ... ,1-i I -- POLE DRILLING PATTERNS AND MOUNTING OPTIONS TypeM ~---~ 2 5/16" [59mm] G--t=i::j__ 3/4" 120mm) Dia. Hole 2 7/16" [124mm] /-'~-(2) 518" [16mm) Dia. Holes Structural Mount .r_,_ .. _0 __ ,..,:__5116" [8mm) Dia. Hole 2 3.14" {70mm] [20mm] MutArm Adapter 0 L s114" J j134mm] Fits 2 3/8" [61mm] O.D. Tenon MOUNTING OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES Extruded Arm Direct Mount (Round or Square Pole) ,,,,, COOPER Lighting Structural Pote Mount (Round or Square Pole} Direct Wall Mount Kit Structrual Wall Mount Wall Bracket with Arm NOTE: Speci/1c~t1ons and d,mens,ons ;ubject to di<>ng,: wi1hou! notice Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com Mast Arm Adapter 12" 0 [305 mm] ® ® I Top Cap Se, Screws L '--~/ Tenon Adapter www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Pe;,chtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 AVU092102 pc 2010-11-04 09:19:14 20 !0-11-04 09:11 :05 ORDERING INFORMATION Number of Lightbars Ao1=1 Bar Ao2=2Bars A03•3Bars A04'4 Bars AOS•S Bars A06°6Bars Voltage E1 =Electronic (120-277\/) 347=3471/ 480' 480V Distribution T2'Typell T3'Typelll T4' Type IV 5M0' Type V Square Medium swa, Type v Square Wide SXQ' Type V Square "'"" 5MR' Type V Round Medium SWR' Type V Round Wide RW' Rectangular Wide SL2=Type II w/Spill Control su=Type 111 wlSl)lll Control SL4=Type IVw/Spill Control SLL =90 Degree Spill Light Eliminator Left SLR=90 Degree Spill Light Eliminator Right Noles: 1 Arm not included. Order seperelely SIie accessonn. s,-ndard 4000 K CCT and gn111ter than 70 CRI. Finish ~ BK=Black AP=Grey BZ=Bronie WH=White DP"Dark Platinum GM=Graphite Metallic Cullom end RAL color metch;ng eveileble upon 1eque"1. Consult rour customer Hrv<ce representative lo, fun her information Compa1ible with 10" MA1051 arm only Compatible wt!h 10· MA105Jarm only Wall mounl flfUC1ual option• do not inclutle arm Hsambly I Sea Acceosorin) Compatible with 10' MA1 231 arm only. Add at sutr,)I in lhe order oh own. 8 Low~avel output va,ies by bar count Consult hlctory. RequOfes quan1i1y two or more LightBAAS. 9 Con•ult customer HtYice for lee<:l t,meo and lumen multipl,er lll Available wilh All1, All2, All3, or AD4 configurations only. Sp,ocrfy 120 or 277V. LED c.>ld w.ethar integral banary pack ia rated for minimum cparafing temperature -4•f (-20"C). Op6ral&1 ill light bar for 90 mi nut"", minimum 1300 intlel lumens. Not aveolable on all ,;onf1gu1e11on,;, oon1ult fatla,y. Re1ecl for uBB in 25•C ambient. Ava,leble w,1h SL2. SL3. 5W0, 5WR. 5MO ond 5MR aptioo onlv 11 Order Hperaiely, 1eplace XX wiLh color suffix 12 Un when mounting fiK1ure heado ol 90" incremenis. 13 For use in downhghl1ng &~l1cat1on• onlv 14 lncludao •rn. only. Mu"1 opecify WflCP or WRCS ,n forture mde,;ng logk Down light only Stfqetural Op1ions ' """--"""' PRCPS=Slrut Rod and Oev1s Set for Square Pole (Painted to match fixture. does not if\Clude arm) PRCCS=Stttinless Strut Rod and Clevis Set4 for Square Pole (C!cvis painted to match fixture, does not include ,~, PRC PR' Strul Rod and Oevis Set for s Round Pole (Painted to match fixture. does not indude arm) PRCCR' Stainless Strut Rod and Clevis Set• for Round Pole (Clevis pain!ed to match fixture, does not included arm) ........... WRCP' Strut Rod an:::I Clevis Set (Pain!ed• to match fo:ture, does not include arm) WRCS" Stainless Steel Strut Rod and • Clevis Set (Oevis' painted to match fixture, does not include arm) Options ~ T•Terminal Block pc=Button Type Photocell (specify voltage) R=NEMA Photocontrol Receptacle 2L =Bi-level Switching• LCF=LightBAR Cover Plate Ma1ches Housing F1n1sti 1000=70 CRl/6000K CCT• 1cs=lntegral Cokl Weather Battery'" Pack (Specify 120 or 277) "" COOPER Lighting NOTE· Specd1c.a11ons antl tl1mt'nsions subject to mange wittiovl notice Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com VXM VISION SIT[ MEDIUM LED Accessot"ies " MA 1050-XX=6" Arm for Square Pote MA1051-XX:,:10" Arm for Square Pol@U MA1052-XX=6" Arm lot Roond Pol .. MA 1063-XX=10" Arm for Round Pok,12 MA10S4-XX=Wall Bra<:ta1 with 6" Arm•a MA10!i6-XX=Direc1 MOU11t lor Squarn Pote MA1057-XX, Dir<ICI Mount lor Roo;d P<>e MA1201-xx, Direct Wall Moon1 K~13 MA1207-xx, Mas1 Arm Adapte< MA12311-XX• VXM Structural MOU11t Wai Mount14 ~. MJ\1017-XX• Single..,rm Tenon Mapter for 2 3J8" O.D. Tenon MA101a.xx, 2@1SO Oeg,ee T .. non Mapte, !or 2 J/S" O.D. Tenon MA10Ht·XXo 3@120 D9g,_ Tenon Mep!e, !or 2 m·o.D.Tenon MA1041J-)()(, 4@90 Degree Toanon Adaplllr for 2 3/8" O.D. Tenon MA1048-XX' 2@90 Degroo T,enon Adapter for 2 3/8" 0.D. Tenon MA1115-XX 3@90 Degree Tenon Mapterfc,r 2 3J8"0.D.Tenon MA1116-XX· 2@120 Oeg,ee Tenon Adepter tor 2 3/8." 0.0. Tooon MA 1010-XX=Singlo.arm Tenon Adapie, for 3 112· O.D. Tenon MA1011-XX=2@180 Degree Tenon Adapter lor J 112"0.D Tenon MA1012-XX=3@120 Degree Tenon Adapter lor 3 112" O.D. Tenon MA1013·XX=4@90 Degr"" Tenon Adapter for 3 112" O.D. Tenon MA1014·XX=2@90 Deg""' Tenon Adaplllr for 3 112"0.D Tenon MA101&-XX:2@12{1 Degroo Tenon Adapte, for J 112" O.D. Tenon MA1016-XX=3@90 Degree Tenon Adap«,r IOI J 112" O.D. Tenon OAJRA101&=NEMA Photoo:Jntr<> • Mul~-Tap OA/RA1027=NEMA Photocontrol -480V OA/RA1 201.=NEMA Photoo:Jnlfot • 347V MA 1 253=10kV Circuit Module Repfacemem www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Cen1er 1121 Highw;;iy 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 AVU092102 pc 2010· 11-04 09:19.14 2010-11-0409:11 OS DESCRIPTION The classic lines and sophisticated construction of Vision Site LED makes it an ideal complement to site design. Offering LED technology across the VXS andVXM, Vision provides true family scaling in both physical form and lumen capability for architectural site lighting applications. UL and cUL listed for use in wet locations. SPECIFICATION FEATURES Construction HOUSING: Heavy wall, one piece die-cast aluminum housing has precise tolerance control and repeatability in manufacturing. Housing features a partition wall that isolates driver components for cooler operation. lntegrel aluminum heat sink provides superior heat transfer in +40"C ambient environment. DOOR: One- piece die-cast aluminum construction with toofless release latch. Door swings down and is retained on two (2) catch hinges. GASKET: Continuous gasket provided to seal housing to optic tray. LENS: Downlight lens is LED board integrated acrylic over- optics, each individually sealed for IP66 rating. HARDWARE:Toolless release button latches are stainless steel/aluminum construction, painted to match housing and allows access to internal housing and electrical components. Optics DISTRIBUTION: Choice of fifteen (15) high efficiency AccuLED optical systems, featuring patented designs that maximize light collection and directional distribution onto the application region. Each optical lens is precision manufactured via injection molding then precisely arranged and sealed on the board media. LED's: High output LED's, 50,000+ hours life at >70% lumen DIMENSIONS maintenance, offered standard in 4000"K (+/-275K) CCT and >70 CRI. LightBAR optic tray is able to rotate 360° in 90° increments for specific placement of the distribution relative to fixture. Electrical DRIVER: LED drivers are potted and heat sunk for optimal performance and prolonged life. Standard drivers feature electronic universal voltage (120-277V/50-60hz), greater than 0.9 power factor, less than 20% harmonic distortion and feature ambient temperature range of +40"C {104"F) down to minimum starting temperature of -30°C l- 22"F). Shipped standard with Cooper lighting proprietary circuit module designed to withstand 10kV of transient line surge. All LED LightBARS™ and drivers are mounted to dedicated mounting trays and are easily replaced by use of quick disconnects for ease of wiring. Driver tray is hinged and removable without the use of tools. Options to control light levels, energy savings and egress capabilities (battery pack and separate circuit) are available. Mounting ARM: One-piece extruded aluminum arm available in standard 6" and 10" lengths. Internal bolts guides allow easy positioning of fixture during installation to pole or wall surface. 25' POLE STRUCTURAL MOUNT: Die-cast aluminum cleat factory mounted to luminaire and finished in luminaire color. Stainless steel structural rod measures 1/2" in diameter and is provided in luminaire finish color or optional natural finish. Product works in conjunction with dedicated accessory arms (ordered seperately). lnvue poles are provided pre-drilled when structural mount option drill pattern is specified. See lnvue poles section for complete selection. Additional mounting accessories available. Finish Housing is finished in 5 stage super premiumTGIC polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness for superior protection against fade and wear. lightBAR 1 .. cover plates are standard white and may be specified to match finish of luminaire housing. Standard colors include black, bronze, grey, white, dark platinum and graphite metallic. RAL and custom color matches available. Consult Outdoor Architectural Colors brochure for a complete selection. Warranty VXM LED features a 5 year limited warranty. L__,r [432 mml'---- 7' [178mml ~~---~~~·II I 6" or 10" (152 mm or 254 mm] coo~ Lighting WWW.CO ope rlig hti n g. CO m INVUE® •~'.'.'9' Type PL.B2 Date VXM VISION SITE MEDIUM LED 1 -6 LightBARS Solid State LED ARCHITECTURAL LED AREA/SITE LUMINAlRE SustainabL-&Oesign CERTIFICATION DATA 40"C AmbientTemperature Rating UL and cUL listed !SO 9001 IP66 LlghtBARS ARRA Compliant LM79 / LM80 Compliant 1.5G Vibration Tested ENERGY DATA Electronic: LED Driver >0.9 Power Factor <20% Total Harmonrc Distortion 120-277V/50 & 60hz, 347Vl60hz, 480V/60hz -30°C Minimum Temperature EPA Effective Projected Area: (Sq. Ft.) Single: -1.6 lmilx.) Single Sttllc:tural; -1.82 lmax.) SHIPPING DATA Approllimate Net Weight: 51 lbs. l2J.18 kgs.) AVU092102 pc 2010-11·04 09:19.14 POWERANDLUMENSBYBARCOUNT #of System Type SL2 Type Sl3 Type SL4 ··~ Waits Lumens Lumens Lumens 1 Bar ·-'-'--· 1,626 1,724_ ---1,677 --· 2 Bars 53 3,252 3,447 3.354 3 Bars 80 4,878 5,170 5,031 4 Bars 103 6.504 6,694 6,708 5 Bars 129 6,130 8,617 8,385 6 Bars 156 9,837 10.426 10,146 NOTE: Lumen values based upon 40001< CCT, 350mA drive current, 25"C ambient operating temperature MOUNTING VARIATIONS Type5WO Lumens 1,866 3,735 5,602 7,469 S,337 11,228 Wall Mount Arm Mouru Single EPA 1.6 Arm Mount 2 @ 180° EPA 3.2 Arm Mount 2 @ 90" EPA 3.2 POLE DRILLING PATTERNS AND MOUNTING OPTIONS TypeM ~--~~ 2 5/16" [59mm] 3/4" [20mm] Dia. Hole 2 7/16" {124mm] Dia. Holes Structural Mount Type G 5116" 18mm] Dia. Hole 3/4" Omml 7/8" mm] 314" 120mm] MOUNTING OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES ·-------- Ambient Lumen Temperature Multiplier 1o•c 1.04 15°C 1.03 25°C 1.00 40"C 0.96 Arm Mount 3@ 120" (Round Pole Only) EPA 4.5 Mast Arm Adapter Fits 2 318" [61mml O.D.Tenon Arm Mount 3 @ 90" EPA 4,5 VXM VISION SITE MEDIUM LED Arm Mount 4 @ 90° EPA 5.55 Extruded Arm Structural Pole Mount (Round or Square Pole) Structrual Wall Mount Mast Arm Adapter Direct Mount (Round or Square Pole) ""' COOPER Lighting www.cooperlighting.com Direct Wall Mount Kit Wall Bracket with Arm NOTE Specit,ca\1ons and d,mensions subject to changP w1!hnu1 nn1icA Visit our web site at www,cooperlighting.com 12" 0 (305 mm L Tenon Adapter Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 Top Cap AVU092102 pr. 2010-11-04 09:19:14 2010-11-04 09:11 05 ORDERING INFORMATION Sampla Nl.lmber· VXM-A06-LED-E1·T3·GM ProduC1 Family • ~mp:~.: VXM=Vision Site Medium LED"'Solid Stale Light Emitting D;odes Nttmbe, c:if Lightbars '----------' I[ A01=1 Bar Vol019111 II Finish ~ BK=Black AP"'Grey BZ=Brom:e WH"White II ' A02"2 Bars A03° 3 Bars A04=4Bars A05' 5Bars A09' 6Bars E1=Electronic (120-277\/) 347=347V 480'480V DP=Darll Platinum GM=Graphtte Metallic Dbtributlc:in TZ•Type II T3' Type Ill T4°TypelV !MQ• TypeV Square Medium SWQ•TypeV Square Wide SXO' Type V Square Wide SMR' Type V Round Medium 5WR' Type V Round Wide nw, Rectangular Wide SLZ"Type II w/Spill Control SL3=Type 111 wlSpiU Control SL4=Type IV w/Spill Control SLL =90 Degre<! Spill Light Eliminator Left SLR=90 Degree Spill Light Eliminator Right Notes, , Arm not included Order Hp,tr,ne,V. S.e accaosoriH. S1andard 4000 K ccr and gre«ler than 70 CRI. Cuinom and RAL color matching avBilabla upon raques1. Con wit your custom,tr 1ervice Mprecefllalive for lunhe, inforrnaticn. Compdble .,,;th 10" MA10S1 1,m cnly Ccmp.olibla .,,;th 10" MA1063 arm cnly Wall mount inructuel cption1 do nol include arm auambly (Su Ace11ssona&) Co,mp,ri,bl,i wi1h 10" MA1231 arm on,V. Add H ouffi1< ,n lhe 01der 1hown. Low,l ..... al output variao by bar count. ContUH fectory. Requi,n quantil\l lWO or mere lightBARS eon .... tt i::ustomer •"rvice for Ind t,m.,. and lum,on muU,plier 10 Avai!ebl,t wi1h A01, A02, A03, or A04 configuurticno only, Specrty 120 or 277V. LED cold weather integr1I battery p,icli i• ratad for minimt.Jm cpt1raling lamperstura -4"F (·20"q. Operatn (1) ligh1bar lor 90 mint.JtH, minimum 1:300 in,tal lumano. Not ""•ilabl,i in ell conhgur1t1or,1. consult lllctory. Rated for""" in 25•C ambient .. Aveilabl• w,th Sl2, SL3. 6WO. 6WR. 5MO and 5MR op"Uco onlv. 11 Ord,or MPUalaly, 1eplac:e XX with color auffix 12 UM when mOtJnting fonu,e hnOI 1190• inc,.manto. 1J F<>r uu in dcwnl1gh1ing appl,cat1on• only. 14 lncludu arm only. Must apacify WRCP er WRCS in ~><lure ordering logic. Down hght only. II _I Structural Options ~ II PRCPS"'Slrvt Rod arld Clevis Set for • Square Pole (Painted to match fixture, does not include arm) PRCCS=Stainles.s Strut Rod arld Clevis Set• for SQuare Pole (Clevis painted to match fixture, does not include amoJ PRCPR' S1rut Rod and Clevis Set for s Round Pole (Painted to match focture, does not include arm) PRCCR' Stainless Strut Rod and Clevis Sets fDI" Round Pole (Clevis pain led to match fixture, does not included amo) ............ WRCP' Strvt Rod and Clevis Set (Paintede 1o match fixture, does not include amo) WACS' Stainless Steel Strut Rod and e Clevis Set (Clevis· painted to match flXlure, does not include arm) Options 7 T=Term1nal Bloc.: pc=Bullon Type Photocell {specify ~oltage) R"'NEMA Photocontrol Receptacie 2L =B1·Level Swi!chinge LCf=LighlBAR cover Plate Matches Housing Finish 7060=70 CRll6000K CCTe ICB=lnlegral Cold weatller Battery 10 Pack (Specify 120 or277) --COOPER Lighting NOTE· Speciiica1ions ond dimensions svbj<lel to tliar>ge wi!hovl nolice Visit our web site at www.cooper!ighting.com VXM VISION SITE MEDIUM LED ___J A,;:o:;tissories '' MA10!IO.XX=6" Arm for Square Pole MA10111·XX=10" Arm fur Squa,., Polt112 MA10112·XX=6" Arm !or Rour>d Pol.. MA10!1:J-XX=10" Arm for Round Pole12 MA101!14-XX=Wall B1acketWllh 6" /\rmu MA10M-XX=[);red Mount fo< Square Pole MA10ll7-XX: Oirnd Mount for Raur>d Pole MA1:Z01-XX• Oir~ctWall Mount K1t13 IIIA 1207-XX: Mast Arm Adapt,s,r I/IA 1231-XX• VXM S!Juctmal Mount Wall Mount14 hm MA 1011.xx, Singl&-a,m Tt1non Adapter fu.r 2 J/8"" 0.0. Tenon MA1018-XX: 2@180 o..g,.,.. Tenon Ada pier for 2 318" 0.0. Tenon MA1019-XX: 3@120 o..g,..., Tenon Adapter for 2 318" O.D. T,tnon MA 104&-XX, 4~90 Degree Tenon AdapM for 2 m·o.o Tenon MA1048-XX 2@90 Degroo Tonon Adapter !or 2 318"0.0. Tenon MA.111ll-XX 3@90 Degree Tenon Adapler for 2 J/8" 0.0 Tenon MA1116,XX 2@120 Oegrne Tenon Adapl(!r 1or 2 318" 0.0. Tenon MA1010-XX:=Single-arm Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2" 0.0. Tenon MA101 t-XX=2@1BO Degree Tenon Adapter for J 112" 0.0 Tenon MA1012-XX=3@120 Deg,oo Tenon /\dapte, for 3 112"0D Tenon MA1013-XX=4@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 112"0.D. Tenon MA1014·XX:2@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 112·00 lenon MA101S-XJ(=2@120 Degree Tenon Adapter fol 3 112" O.D l eoon MA10111-XX=3@90 Degroo T,;,non Adap1erfor 3 112"0D Tenon OAJRA10111=NEMAPoolocontrol Multi.Tap OAJRA1027=NEMA Pholocontrol 480V OA/RA1201 =NEMA Pholccootrol 3'17V MA1211:J: lOkV Circuit Mooule Replaoament I www.coopertlghting.eom Customer First Cen1er 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 AVU092102 pc 2010·11-04 09:19:14 2010.11-04 09 11 :05 SPECIFICATIONS: HOUSING: CRAFT LITE" APPLICATIONS, • UL/CUL Listed Wet Location • UL/CUL Hazardous Location (Closs I, Division 2; Groups A,B,( & D Closs 11, Divisi-On 2; Groups F & G! • NSF Certified Food Processing (Sp/osl, lone, Food lone) Industrial & Commercial UL Listed Marine Onside, Inside Dep-Proo/) • Transit Constructed of 20GA (.036) zinc coated steel for unmatched corrosion protection. Featuring a double channel, one welded inside the other, with space between the channel sides to capture the diffuser. Threaded hubs ore continuously welded into the channel ends providing o sealed wirewoy access. Removable plugs seal the hubs when not utilized. food Zone: All external metal components of stainless steel (53 option std). OPTIONAL PREMIUM MATERIALS: S2 -304 stainless steel outer channel. 53 -External metal components of 304 s1ainless steel. 54 -All metal components of 304 stainless steel. REFLECTOR: FLUORESCENT SURFACED BENEFITS, !SF .A 1 • Lu mi noires adaptable to your specific needs FEATURES, • Square version available • Available in Stainless Steel construction • Premium electronic ballast standard • Every luminoire tested with lamps to assure customer satisfaction • 5 year limited warranty • Proudly made in USA 0 r-3·--, uJ Fabricated of zinc coated steel, painted with a minimum reflectance of 88%. END CAPS: 9/32" DIA. EMBOSSED MOUNTING STRAP W/ 1/2" THREADED HUB W/ PLUG Die formed of l 8GA {.048) stainless steel. A threaded, knurled ring secures the end cop to the luminoire housing. End caps secure lens. GASKETING: EPDM is used in the housing channels and end caps. FINISH: Pointed surfaces are two mil of white polyester enamel, special colors available. LENS: One piece nominal .125 white translucent cell cast virgin acrylic. A two piece lens with center joiner band is available (Hl option). ELECTRICAL: All ballasts and lompholders ore UL listed. Marine: Utilizes o three gong terminal block for electrical connections. MOUNTING: Surface, chain, or pendant options available for covered ceiling installotions. Continuous row luminaires manufactured with aligning pins and utilize joiner bands. Surface mounted HO luminaires require a minimum l 1 /2" clearance (Brocket kif supplied). For further information, contact Soles Representative. Splash and Food Zone: Surface for covered ceiling installations only. Marine: Surface for covered ceiling installations on!y. TEMPERATURE CODE: Class l, Div. 2= T4 (1352 C); Class 11, Div. 2= T3B (1652C) MTG. HOLES (STD) 5/16' DIA. MTG. HOLES (MC2) 0 ---..-~A 1/2" THREADED FLANGE (OPTJONAL, WET LOC.) LENGTH DIMENSIONS IN INCHES A B C D ID 1/2" I 3/4 6 9 1/2 10 5/8 13• 3 6 11 13 1/B 16" 2 1/2 10 15 16 1/8 19" 4 10 18 19 1/B 2n 4 1/2 16 15 26 1/B 2 FT rs 311/16 16 23 3/B 24 1/2 3 FT 10 1/2 16 37 38 1/8 3FTT5 9 5/8 16 35 1/4 36 3/8 41! 81/2 31 49 50 1/8 4FTT5 71/2 32 47 48 1/8 6 FTTDM 13 48 74 751/8 8 FTTDM 17 64 98 991/8 C2 JOINER BANDS SQUARE POLYCARBONATE LENS AND END CAP Pornmount Industries, Inc 800-521-5405 Fa~ 800-852-7154 www.poramountlighting.com REV 8/05 c®d Hazardous Localion: @ c@ Food Processing: G l!2 Series fl PHOTQMETRICS: For additional photometry, go to paromounilighting.com Model C21323, 4FT, White Pointed lnierior and White Acrylic Lens, 1 32W TB Fluorescent lamp, Lamp lumen Roting = 3050 Coefficients of Utilization, Zonal Cavity Method Zonal Lumen Summary Fl C R fl 20l' oo, ovit,. e ectonce: • RC 8 ] I RW 7 5 3 I 7 5 3 I 5 3 .I '" ' 0 97 97 97 97 93 93 93 93 84 84 84 C I 85 80 75 70 81 76 71 67 69 65 62 ' 2 76 68 61 55 71 64 sa 52 58 53 48 3 69 58 50 44 65 55 48 42 50 44 39 4 62 51 43 36 59 48 41 35 44 37 31 5 57 45 37 30 54 43 35 19 39 31 17 6 51 40 32 26 49 38 31 15 35 28 13 7 48 36 28 13 45 34 27 11 31 25 20 a 45 33 15 10 42 31 24 19 18 12 18 9 42 30 11 18 39 28 11 17 26 20 16 10 39 17 20 16 37 16 20 15 24 18 14 '' CRAFT LITE® LUMINAIRE ORDERING INFORMATION: ~g C2 Wet locotion I Stondord HC2* Hozmdous T2 Tandem SC2 Splash Zone FC2 food Zone RC2 Morine Inside MC2 Inside Orip,oroof 1800 18W 6240 4P;n (10S) 0" 26QD 26W614Q 4 Pin (10S) O" 188X fl81STI (13'') O" 27BX f24 f2n5IT (16") 0" 39BX f36 f3915IT (19") 0" 40BX' f4015IT (1fD O" 50BX f5015IT (2FD 0" 1415 f1415 (2FD O" 17' f1718 (2fl) 0" 21!5 f21TS (3fl) O" 24T5H f2415/HO (2FD 0" 25 f2518 (3fl) O" 28TS f28T5 (4FD O" 32' F3218 I 4HI O" 3915H f3915/HO (3fl) O" 54TSH f54TSIHO {4fTI O' TAN DEM LAMPS Tondem Jomps ore tandem wired 40BX' f40T5IT (4fD 0° 21!5 f11T5 (6fD 0° 2S f15TB (6FD 0° 28TS f18TS (BFD 0° 37• f32TB (8fl) O" 39T5H f39l5/HO (6FD 0° S4TSH f54T5/HO mm O" 2 . 125 [leor Acryli( (No Pattern) 3 . l 25 While Acrylic (bfJ5e) 4 .125 Prismatic A(l)iic (P4) 6 125(1eor Polyi.:orllimote (No Pattern) N/A >4FT 7 .125 White Polycarbonate (N/A >4fl) 8 .156 Prismatic Polyrnibonote [Pl 2] N/A > 4FT 9 Square Polycarbonate (lt1iite S!Qm/(}(d. Clea, 8 prismaric avuJable.! LENSES AVAILABLE FOR FOOD ZONE 6 .125 Clear Polyi.:orbonate (No Pattern) N/A >4FT 7 .125 White Po~corbonote (NIA >4fl) (base) 8 .156 Prismatic PolyrnrOOnote (Pl 2) NIA > 4FT 9 Square Polycarbonate (White Standard. Gear 8 pmmalic avmlab/e.) Colored acrylic lens available, consult agent. (See page '215 for available lens colors.) S2 Stoinless Steel Outer Channel S3 Stainless Steel faterior S4 Stainless Steel Complete 304 SS Standard, 3 J 6 SS and other materials available, consult agenf Zone lumen1 %lam %Luminoire 3 I 0 0-JO 367 110 140 5 .3 .I .5 .3 I 0 0-40 613 20A 137 /7 77 77 70 70 70 66 0-60 1211 40.0 466 0-90 1034 66] 775 90-120 457 150 17.4 90-130 528 113 20.1 90 150 585 19.2 12.3 90-180 589 19.3 11.5 0-180 2624 86 100 62 59 16 56 53 51 48 51 48 44 47 44 41 37 45 40 36 40 36 33 30 39 34 30 35 31 17 15 35 30 25 31 27 23 21 31 16 22 18 24 20 18 18 23 19 16 21 17 15 Totol luminaire Optirnl Efficiency = 86.0% 26 11 17 23 19 15 13 14 19 15 11 17 14 11 22 17 13 20 16 11 11 Spacing Crlterion: 0° = 1.22, 90° = 1.55 -1-·IIIM/b:_i-~ EMERGENCY 120V/6GH1 Stondard Bl Bodine BOL700 (0-50°Q N/A < 3FT 277V/60Hz B2 Bodine BDLSOD (0-50°() N/A <4FT 347V/60Hl B3 Bodine B0l90D (0-SO~Q N/A <3FT BALLASTS DI lutron Dimming EC0-10 D2 Electroni( Dimming 04 < l 0% THO (Consult Foctory) 08 low-Temp Magnetic Ballas! (NIA TB) D9 Mogne1ic Ballast E9 Rapid Stor! Electronic Ballast fl f2 FUSING W/HLR fusing (fas!) GMF/HLR fusing (Slow\ LENSING HI Tondem lens With Joiner Bond H2 .150 Extro He!l\"y Cleo1 Acrylic HJ .150 htro Heovy White Acrylic JO Lomp Sleeves (Spe<ify Colar) J8 Wire Guard (ti/A Splosrv'food Zones) K8 R~Hec1or Tnpe (Spei:ify location Consuh Factory\ MOUNTING Ml Pendant Mount (Pendants by Others) M2 Mounting Broe~! Kit (Surface/ (hain) Ml In-Row (Row Information Required) M6 Angled Mounting Brocket (Consult Agent) M9 Woll Mounting MISC P9 Special Point Color (Provide Point Code & Chip) RS Specular Aluminum ReHec!or Sl Speciol Moteriol (Consull Agenl) T3 Tamper Resistant 16 Screw-on End Cops W5 Rear Wire Entry (Consult factory) Yl Mite lite (Consu11 Agent) Y5 RFI Suppressors Y6, Flex-lDc~· tomp Holder (Med Bi-Pin On~: T8, Tl 2) Add hyphens between options 50Hz & Other Voltages Available ,. lamp Type Available for Hazardous location. INDIVIDUAL UNITS STANDARD. Project Information: Other Wattages and lengths Available, Consult factory. NSF food Processing Note: Food Zone (F prefix) luminaires come in DIRECT CONTACT with food. Splash Zone (S prefix) units may become soiled, but ore outside the danger of recontamination. Information subiect to change without notice. Lamps supplied by others. © 2005 Paramount Industries, Inc. P.O. Box 259 Croswell, Ml 48422 Paramount Industries, lnc. 800-521-5405 rox 800-852-7154 www.poromountlighting.com m TACOMA• SEATTLE• SPOKANE Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report PREPARED FOR: Renton School District #403 7812 South 124th Street Seattle, WA 98178-4830 PROJECT: Lindbergh High School Renton, Washington 210299.70 PREPARED BY: Theresa R. Dusek Natural Resources Ecologist Project Manager DATE: September 2010 Revised February 2011 Civil Engineers • Structural Engineers • Landscape Architects • Community Planners • Natural Resource Ecologists • Land Surveyors • Neighbors Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report PREPARED FOR: Renton School District #403 7812 South 124th Street Seattle, WA 98178-4830 PROJECT: Lindbergh High School Renton, Washington 210299.70 PREPARED BY: Theresa R. Dusek Natural Resources Ecologist Project Manager DATE: September 2010 Revised February 2011 Executive Summary This wetland delineation was based on the Onsite Determination Method described in the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual(1997), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (1987). Based on the information derived through site reconnaissance and readily available documents, four wetland areas were identified on southern portion the site, and one constructed ditch was identified in the northwest portion of the site. The four onsite wetlands were historically part of a ravine swale that was modified when the original school was constructed. Although modified, the wetlands meet the biological criteria for wetlands. According to the Renton Municipal Code, Section 4-3-050.M, the wetlands are Category 3 systems requiring 25-foot buffers. The hydrogeomorphic classifications of the onsite wetlands are Slope for Wetlands A, C, and D, and Depressional for Wetland B. The Cowardin classification of the four onsite wetlands is Palustrine scrub-shrub/emergent, seasonally flooded. Molasses Creek, a Type A stream, is located offsite greater than 300 feet to the southeast. Type A streams require a code-required buffer of 100 feet. A ditch is located along the north boundary of the site near the northwest corner. The ditch near the northwest corner of the site was clearly constructed in the 1970s per the contours shown on the Renton High School No. 3 Site Plan, prepared by Fred Bassetti and Company/Architects. The ditch should not be considered a jurisdictional wetland or stream because it was constructed when the original school was constructed to convey runoff to a culvert along 128'h Avenue SE. The site is located in the Cedar-Sammamish Basin of Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 8. Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 mmm11 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1. 1 Scope of Services ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Site Location and Description ....................................................................................... 1 2.0 Document Review ........................................................................................................... 1 2.1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map ...................................... 2 2.2 Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington ............................................................... 2 2.3 SalmonScape Stream Map ........................................................................................... 2 2.4 King County iMap ........................................................................................................ 2 2.5 DNR and Fish and Wildlife Database Reviews ................................................................ 2 3.0 Site Reconnaissance ....................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Topography ................................................................................................................ 3 3.2 Fauna ......................................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Vegetation .................................................................................................................. 3 3.4 Soils ........................................................................................................................... 3 3.5 Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 4 4.0 Wetland .......................................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Wetland A .................................................................................................................. 4 4.2 Wetland B .................................................................................................................. 5 4.3 Wetland C .................................................................................................................. 5 4.4 Wetland D .................................................................................................................. 6 5.0 Wetland and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Regulations ....................................................... 7 6.0 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 7 7.0 Closure ............................................................................................................................ -z 8.0 References ...................................................................................................................... 9 Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 mmm11 Appendices Appendix A Exhibits WE-1 ................. Vicinity Map WE-2 ................. King County Soils Map WE-3 ................. SalmonScape Map WE-4 ................. King County iMap Appendix B Site Plan Renton High School No. 3 AppendixC Wetland and Site Survey Appendix D Definition of Plant Indicator status and Wetland Determination Data Forms Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 mmm11 1.0 INTRODUCTION AHBL, Inc. has completed wetland delineation on the Lindbergh High School parcel located at 16426 128'h Avenue SE, Renton, Washington (Appendix A, Exhibit WE-1). This report has been prepared to define the wetland boundaries and buffers located on the site. 1.1 Scope of Services The scope of work for this study was limited to the following tasks: • A review of documents readily available, including local wetland inventory maps, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Maps, aerial photographs, previous wetland review completed by others, and Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) databases. • A visual assessment to observe existing site conditions and to identify wetlands located on or within 300 feet of the site, and wildlife habitat and species located on and near the subject parcels. Methods defined in the Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual(1997) were used to determine the presence and extent of wetlands on the site. • Review federal, state, and local regulations pertaining to wetlands and streams identified on and near the site. The review is used to classify the identified wetlands, stream, and wildlife habitat. • An assessment of onsite wetland functions and values. • A report documenting the process, findings, and conclusions for this project. 1.2 Site Location and Description The proposed project site is comprised of three parcels (282305-9004, -9042, and -9093) totaling approximately 37.25 acres, located at 16426 128'h Avenue SE, Renton, Washington (Section 28, Township 23 North, Range 05 East, W.M.) (Appendix A, Exhibit WE-1). Onsite are existing school buildings, parking areas and drive lanes, playfields, and track. Four wetlands are located in the south central portion of the site. A ditch is located along the north boundary of the site near the northwest corner. The ditch near the northwest corner of the site was clearly constructed in the 1970s per the contours shown on the Renton High School No. 3 Site Plan, prepared by Fred Bassetti and Company/Architects (Appendix B). The ditch should not be considered a jurisdictional wetland or stream because it was constructed when the original school was constructed to convey runoff to a culvert along 128th Avenue SE. North and east of the site are residential neighborhoods, ~uth of the site is Renton Park, and west of the site is 128th Avenue SE (Appendix A, Exhibit WE-1). 2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW A review of readily available documents was conducted to characterize the site. Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 mmm11 2.1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory (NW!) Map of the Renton area does not identify wetlands on or adjacent to the site. 2.2 Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington The Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington, as depicted by the Web Soil Survey, was reviewed to determine the general nature of soils on the subject site. The site was determined to contain Alderwood and Everett soils (Appendix A, Exhibit WE-2). The Alderwood series is made up of moderately well drained soils that formed under conifers in glacial deposits. Permeability of this soil is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil, and very slow in the substratum. The Alderwood soil series is not listed as hydric (wetland) soil by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (1995); however, Alderwood soils may contain hydric soil inclusions. Everett gravelly sandy loam series is made up of somewhat excessively drained soils that formed in gravelly glacial outwash under conifers. Permeability of this soil is rapid. The Everett soil series is not listed as hydric (wetland) soil by the NRCS (1995); however, Everett soils may contain hydric soil inclusions. 2.3 SalmonScape Stream Map The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) SalmonScape Version 4 Map indicates that Molasses Creek is located offsite to the southeast. Molasses Creek is listed as a low gradient, between 1 and 2 percent, unconfined channel, fish bearing stream. There is one documented partial fish blockage barrier near the Cedar River. Salmon Scape does not list salmon species within Molasses Creek near the site. Coho are listed in the stream channel downstream approximately 1 mile (Appendix A, Exhibit WE-3). Coho are a federal Species of Concern and a state Candidate species. 2.4 King County iMap The King County iMap website shows a Category 1 wetland approximately 250 feet southeast of the site, and Molasses Creek over 300 feet southeast of the site (Appendix A, Exhibit WE-4). 2.5 DNR and Fish and Wildlife Database Reviews According to the Washington State DNR, Natural Heritage Information System website, updated July 21, 2009, no rare plants or high quality ecosystems are located in the specific township range and sections of the proposed project (Section 28, Township 23 North, Range OS East, W.M.). The Priority Habitat and Species Database, dated June 10, 2010, indicates that (a) wetlands are located on or near the southern portion of the site, (b) that Molasses Creek is located offsite to the south, and (c) a bald eagle nest is located greater than three-quarters of a mile northeast of the site on the Cedar River. Molasses Creek is listed as containing Coho salmon, resident Cutthroat trout, and Sockeye salmon. Wetland Delineabon and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 2 mmm11 3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE On June 10 and 14, 2010, Theresa Dusek visited the property to evaluate the site and surrounding area, and to flag onsite wetlands. The flags were surveyed by ESM. Four onsite wetlands were identified in the south central portion of the site (Appendix C). Wetland boundary flags were pink ribbon or pin flags with "Wetland Delineation" stamped on the flags. The flags were marked with sequential numbers and wetland identifiers (W-lA indicates wetland boundary flag 1 of Wetland A). The sampling point locations were marked with black and orange ribbon flag tied onto vegetation and marked with a numeric identifier (DP-1 indicates Data Point 1). The approximate location, size, and rating of the wetland were also determined. The site visit included visual observation of the project site and, where possible, the surrounding area within 300 feet of the site for wetlands and fish and wildlife habitat areas. The site wetlands were characterized by data gathered at four data points (Appendix C). 3.1 Topography The topography of the project site and surrounding areas has been historically manipulated by historic construction of the school facilities, local roads, parks, and residences. Overall, the site slopes down from the east and west to the center of the property, with an elevation change of approximately 25 feet. The eastern edge of the site slopes down to the east. 3.2 Fauna A red legged frog (Rana aurora), eastern grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), Canadian geese (Branta canadensis), mallards, marsh wrens (Cistothorus palustris), chickadees (Poecile atricapilla), nuthatch (Sitta canadensis), robin {Turdus migratorius), red shafted flicker (Colaptes auratus), and sparrows were observed during the site visit. 3.3 Vegetation Representative sampling points were established to document plant species and dominance of vegetation on the subject property (Appendix D). The dominant vegetative species composition on the site varied from scrub-shrub and emergent wetland, to Douglas fir and big leaf maple forest, to mowed lawn and landscape beds. Overall dominant vegetation on the site included salmonberry (Rubus spectabilus), sedges (Carex spp.), buttercup (Ranunculus repens), red alder (Rubus spectabilus), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), western red cedar {Thuja plicata), salal (Gaulthera shallon), snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus), sword fern (polystichum munitum), dewberry (Rubus ursinus), blackberry (Rubus discolor), elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), and Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis). Plant species listed federally or by the state as threatened or endangered have not been observed on the site. Data forms detailing observations for vegetation are included in Appendix D. 3.4 Soils During the site evaluation, soil conditions (including color, texture, and relative moisture content) were observed and recorded at sampling points on the project site. The indicators used to identify hydric soils can be found in the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils of the United States. Soil types observed on the site ranged from silt loam to gravelly sandy loam to glacial till. Data forms detailing observations for soils are included in Appendix D. Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 3 mmm11 3.5 Hydrology Hydrologic conditions, including saturated soils and indicators of wetland hydrology, as defined by the 1987 and 1997 manuals and supplement, were observed in the wetlands (Appendix D). Generally, the wetlands contained saturated soils at the surface with some areas of ponded water up to 3 inches deep. Hydrology in the wetlands is controlled by groundwater seepage and surface water runoff. Wetland A enters catch basins located on the north and east ends. Wetland B overflows into Wetland C during large rainfall events. Wetland C and D typically contain water from groundwater seepage, which leaves the wetlands via stormwater catch basins. Historically, Wetlands A, B, and C were part of a shallow ravine system that has been highly altered. 4.0 WETLAND Based on the use of the triple-parameter approach, defined within the 1997 manual, and current site conditions, four wetlands were identified in a highly modified historic swale/ravine. Wetland D extends offsite to the southwest. Wetland boundaries are the same using the supplement and the 1997 manual. Vegetation species were identified and classified with a Wetland Indicator Status (WIS) assigned by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1988 and 1993); soil conditions were identified using the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States; and observations of hydrologic conditions, including inundation and soils saturation, were made by hand, excavated with a shovel 18 to 20 inches deep at five representative data points on the site. Additional hand-excavated test pits were completed to determine if there were differences in soil or hydrologic conditions from the marked sample plots. The wetlands were identified as such because all three wetland parameters were present under current site conditions using methods for significantly disturbed sites. The wetlands have been classified using the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al, 1979). Detailed scientific knowledge of wetland functions is limited, so that evaluation of the functions of individual wetlands is qualitative and dependent upon professional judgment. The wetland was evaluated for the following wetland functions and values: (1) flood and stormwater control, (2) base flow and groundwater support, (3) water quality improvement, (4) natural biological support, (5) overall habitat function, and (6) specific habitat functions. 4.1 Wetland A The wetland is located south of the pool building and has a brick wall and catch basins within the wetland. The wetland extends offsite to the south. In accordance with the Renton High School No. 3 Site Plan, prepared by Fred Bassetti and Company/Architects, a parking lot was originally proposed to be constructed in this location. A note on the site plan indicates that the parking lot layout was revised (Appendix B). The surveyed onsite portion of the wetland is 5,440 square feet in size. The total size of the wetland on and off of the site is estimated to be approximately 9,000 square feet in size. The onsite wetland is a Category 3 system with a hydrogeomorphic classification of Slope. According to the Cowardin classification, the wetland is a Palustrine emergent, seasonally flooded system. Hydrologic conditions in the wetland are provided by groundwater seepage and local surface water runoff. Water ponds on top of glacial till and flows to the north and northeast where it enters catch basins. Soils in Wetland A consist of silt loam underlain by a 1-inch layer of crushed Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 4 mmm11 gravel underlain by glacial till. Soils have a distinct sulfidic odor. Dominant vegetation in the wetland includes rushes, sedges, bentgrass and buttercups. Several landscape trees are rooted on the edge or just outside the wetland and provide over story cover. The wetland generally has low biologic functions due to its size, seasonal shallow water, and single plant community. Habitat within the wetland system provides for a narrow range of species that use the adjacent buffer. Snags and downed logs are not present. Habitat diversity is provided by interspersion of "habitat" types between the wetland and adjacent forest and shrub areas located offsite. The wetland has been cleared and filled in the past and has catch basins and the brick wall in the wetland. The wetland buffer contains non-native invasive plant species, including Himalayan blackberry, English ivy, and holly. In general, the wetland has low to moderate hydrologic functions. The wetland is a historically disturbed slope that provides water quality treatment, removal of sediments, and minimal flood water retention. The wetland contains cool water from groundwater discharge and transmits it to the school storm system. 4.2 Wetland B Wetland B is located across a gravel path and down slope from Wetland A. It is located in a historic ravine that is now functioning as a swale. The estimated size of Wetland B is 1,165 square feet. Wetland B is a Category 3 system with a hydrogeomorphic classification of Depressional and Slope. According to the Cowardin classification, the wetland is a Palustrine scrub-shrub, emergent, semi-permanently flooded system. Hydrologic conditions in the wetland are provided by groundwater seepage and local runoff. The wetland contained gravelly sandy loam soils, with 2 to 6 inches of wood chips over the surface in some areas. Dominant vegetation in the wetland includes cottonwood saplings sprouting from stumps, branches, and roots; red osier dogwood; salmonberry; and soft rush. During the site visit, the entire wetland system was saturated or inundated. During the June 10 site visit, water ponded in the wetland was overflowing into Wetland C located to the east. The wetland generally has low biologic functions due to its small size, seasonal hydrology, and altered plant communities. Habitat within the wetland system provides for a moderate range of species that use the adjacent forest, existing wetland habitat, downed logs, shrub, and emergent habitats throughout different stages of their life cycle. The wetland provides suitable refuge for a suite of different fauna, including invertebrates, terrestrial birds, and terrestrial mammals. Habitat diversity is provided by a broad range of structures, vegetation, and interspersion of "habitat" types within the wetland and adjacent habitats. The wetland buffer is highly altered, but contains an intact native plant community to the west. In general, the wetland has low to moderate hydrologic functions. The wetland is a depression on a slope that provides water quality treatment, removal of sediments, and flood water retention. The wetland contains cool water from groundwater discharge and transmits it to Wetland C via infiltration and overland flow, and ultimately enters the school storm system. 4.3 Wetland C Wetland C is located directly east of Wetland B on a cut/fill slope face and at the toe of the slope. It is located in a historic ravine that was modified when the original school was constructed. The estimated size of Wetland C is 1,399 square feet. Wetland C is a Category 3 system with a Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 5 mmm11 hydrogeomorphic classification of Slope. According to the Cowardin classification, the wetland is a Palustrine scrub-shrub, emergent, semi-permanently flooded system. Hydrologic conditions in the wetland are provided by groundwater seepage and local runoff. The wetland contains silt loam underlain by gravelly sandy loam soils. Dominant vegetation in the wetland includes salmonberry, red osier dogwood, bentgrass, giant horsetail, and soft rush. During the site visit, the entire wetland system was saturated or inundated. The wetland generally has low biologic functions due to its small size, saturated soil condition, and altered plant communities. Habitat within the wetland system provides for a moderate range of species that use the adjacent slope and existing wetland habitat throughout different stages of their life cycle. The wetland provides limited breeding, food, and refuge for fauna. The wetland buffer is highly altered. In general, the wetland has low to moderate hydrologic functions. The wetland is a groundwater seep on a slope that provides limited water quality treatment. The wetland contains cool water from groundwater discharge and transmits it to the school storm system. 4.4 Wetland D Wetland D is located along a slope and in a shallow channel located south of Wetland C. Wetland D extends offsite to the southwest. The surveyed onsite portion of the wetland is 1,768 square feet in size. The total size of the wetland on and off of the site is estimated to be greater than 1 acre in size. Wetland D is a Category 3 system with a hydrogeomorphic classification of Slope and Depressional. According to the Coward in classification, the wetland is a Palustrine scrub-shrub, emergent, seasonally flooded system. Hydrologic conditions in the wetland are provided by groundwater seepage and local runoff. A swale area at the toe of slope collects water and transmits it to the southwest. Soils in the onsite wetland consist of silt loam. Dominant vegetation in the wetland includes red osier dogwood, cottonwood, salmonberry, American brooklime, and buttercup. During the site visit, the entire wetland system was saturated near the surface. The wetland generally has moderate biologic functions due to its size and connection to other plant communities in Renton Park that connect to the Molasses Creek corridor. Habitat within the wetland system provides for a broad range of species that use the adjacent forest, existing wetland habitat, snags and downed logs, shrub, and emergent habitats throughout different stages of their life cycle. The wetland provides suitable feeding, breeding, and refuge for a suite of different fauna, including invertebrates, amphibians, aquatic and terrestrial birds, and aquatic and terrestrial mammals. Habitat diversity is provided by a broad range of structures, vegetation, and interspersion of "habitat" types within the wetland and adjacent habitats. Half of the wetland buffer is well developed and contains forested habitat on the slopes. The wetland buffer contains non-native invasive plant species, including Himalayan blackberry, English ivy, and holly. In general, the wetland has low to moderate hydrologic functions. The wetland is on a slope and in a swale, and provides water quality treatment, removal of sediments, and flood water retention. The seasonal saturated soil conditions and the proximity of the wetland allows for groundwater discharge and recharge to occur in the local area. Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 6 mmm11 5.0 WETLAND AND FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT REGULATIONS Based on the information derived through site reconnaissance and readily available documents, four wetlands are located on the southern portion the, site and one constructed ditch was identified in the northwest portion of the site. The four onsite wetlands were historically part of a ravine swale that was modified when the original school was constructed. Although modified, the wetlands meet the biological criteria for wetlands. According to the Renton Municipal, Code Section 4-3-050.M, the wetlands are category 3 systems requiring 25-foot buffers. The wetlands are category 3 because they do not meet the criteria for category 1 and 2 wetlands, and they are disturbed wetlands that are characterized by human-related hydrologic alterations such as ditching, channelization, and outlet modification; have soils alterations such as the presence of fill, soil removal, and compaction of soils; and have altered vegetation. The City of Renton Municipal code has many exemptions related to small category 3 wetlands. The hydrogeomorphic classifications of the onsite wetlands are Slope for Wetlands A, C, and D, and Depressional for Wetland B. The Cowardin classification of the four onsite wetlands is Palustrine scrub-shrub/emergent, seasonally flooded. Molasses Creek, a Type A stream, is located offsite greater than 300 feet to the southeast. Type A streams require a code-required buffer of 100 feet. The buffer from Molasses Creek does not extend onto the site. A ditch is located along the north boundary of the site near the northwest corner. The ditch was clearly constructed in the 1970s per the contours shown on the Renton High School No. 3 Site Plan, prepared by Fred Bassetti and Company/Architects (Appendix B). The ditch should not be considered a jurisdictional wetland or stream because it was constructed when the original school was constructed to convey runoff to a culvert along 1281h Avenue SE. Critical habitat, as defined by Renton Municipal Code 4-3-050.K, are not located on or adjacent to the site, including habitat associated with the documented presence of species proposed or listed by the federal government or State of Washington as endangered, threatened, candidate, sensitive, monitored, or priority. Federal and state agencies with jurisdiction over impacts to wetland located on and near the site include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Washington State Department of Ecology. 6.0 CONCLUSION Based on the 1997 manual, vegetation, soils, and hydrologic conditions necessary for areas to be considered a wetland were found on the site. Four wetland areas and code required 25-foot buffers were identified on the southern portion the site. In addition, one constructed ditch was identified in the northwest portion of the site. 7.0 CLOSURE The findings and conclusions documented in this report have been prepared for specific application to this site. They have been developed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. Our work was also performed in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our proposal. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are professional opinions based on an interpretation of information Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 7 mmm11 currently available to us, and are made within the operation scope, budget, and schedule of this project. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Wetland boundaries identified by AHBL, Inc. are considered preliminary until the flagged wetland boundaries are validated by a jurisdictional agency. Validation of the wetland boundaries by the regulating agencies provides a certification, usually written, that the wetland boundaries verified are the boundaries that will be regulated by each agency until a specific date or until the regulations are modified. Only the regulating agencies can provide this certification. Because wetlands are dynamic communities affected by both natural and human activities, changes in wetland boundaries may be expected; therefore, wetland delineations cannot remain valid for an indefinite period of time. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers typically recognizes the validity of wetland delineations for a period of 5 years after completion of a wetland delineation report. Development activities on a site 5 years after the completion of this wetland delineation report may require revision of the wetland delineation. In addition, changes in government codes, regulations, or laws may occur. Because of such changes, our observations and conclusions applicable to this site may need to be revised wholly or in part. AHBL, Inc. ~R"D~ Theresa R. Dusek Natural Resources Ecologist Project Manager TRD/lsk September 2010 Revised February 2011 Q: \2010\210299\ WORDPROC\Reports\20110202_Rpt_(Wetland_ Del)_210299. 70 .docx We~and Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 8 mmm11 8.0 REFERENCES Cooke, S. S. 1996. Wetland and Buffer Functions Semi-Quantitative Assessment Methodology, Draft User's Manual. Cooke Scientific Services. Seattle, Washington. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Publication FSW/OSB-79/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. Hitchcock, C. and Cronquist, Arthur. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington. Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington-Revised. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication # 04-06-025. King County. 2010. iMap. http://www5.kingcounty.gov/iMAP/viewer.htm?mapset=kcproperty Munsell Soil Color Chart. 2000. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Gretag Macbeth, New Windsor, New York. Null, W.S., G. Skinner, and W. Leonard. 2000. Wetland functions characterization tool for linear projects. Washington State Department of Transportation, Environmental Affairs Office. Olympia. Renton. 2010. Renton Municipal Code. Reppert, R.T., W. Sigles, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. Meyers. 1979. Wetlands Values: Concepts and Methods for Wetlands Evaluation. Inst. for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Belvoir, VA. Res. rpt. 79-Rl. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2010 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0, L.M. Vasilias, G.W. Hurt, and C.V. Noble (eds.). USDA, NRCS, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. United States Department of Agriculture, NRCS. 2006. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Tenth Edition. Soil Survey Staff. United States Department of Agriculture, NRCS. 2009. Websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/websoilsurvey.aspx. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 1995. Hydric Soils of Washington. 19 pp. Wetland Delineabon and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 9 mmm11 United States Department of Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1997. National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary. A draft revision of: Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26.9). Washington, D.C. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. National Wetland Inventory: www.fws.gov/nwi/wetlandsdata/googleearth.htm. Vepraskas, M.J. 1999. Redoximorphic Features for Identifying Aquic Conditions. Technical Bulletin 301. North carolina Agricultural Research Service. North carolina State University. Raleigh, North carolina. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual. Washington State Department of Ecology, Publication No. 96-94. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2010. Priority Habitats and Species Maps in the vicinity of T23N ROSE Section 28. June 10. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2010. Salmonscape Maps. Fortress. wa .gov/ dfw/gispublic/ apps/ sa lmonsca pe/ def au It. htm. Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 2009. Washington Natural Heritage Information, Sections that Contain Natural Heritage Features. July 21. http://www.dnr.wa.gov/Publications/amp_nh_trs.pdf. Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 10 mmm11 Appendix A Exhibits WE-1. ............... Vicinity Map WE-2 ................ King County Soils Map WE-3 ................ SalmonScape Map WE-4 ................ King County iMap Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 mmm11 I •• I , -1 I 1, 1' 1'. Address 16426 128TH A VE. SE RENTON WA 98058 Directions I I .f! I ! I · I i L, I 1 1 ~ I ' • ,·, TRAVELING WA -1 67 SOUTH OR NORTH I. TAKE EXIT TOWARDS S. 180TH ST./SW 43 RD ST . 2 . TAKE T HE S. 43RD ST. RAMP 3 . S. 43 RD ST . BE CO MES SE CARR RD. 4. SE CARR BE COMES SE PETROVITSKY RD. 5. TU RN LEFT ONTO 12 8TH A VE SE 6. LINDB ERGH HIGH SCHOOL IS ON THE RIGH T in \orl h 3Jln Ste ee l. s,;1e 300. '°'""''· IIA Sc,)J 25J JSJ/07 ll. )'6 0~6 !cc'.ol A,ec,c, S,o '.h, $.,'le 310, Seol tle. WA %10 4 206.2Sl .2425 l [L REF ERENCE SOURCE : MAP QUEST.COM GOOGLE MAPS LINDBERGH HIGH SC HO OL, RENTON WA AHBL JOB #: 210299.70 VICINITY MAP I . , .i • I •• --• I I .! I I. ' ,r , ..... ---'1. NORTH WE-1 Legend ~ AgC ~ AgD II Ur ~=t~~~j Eve ALDERWOOD GRA\HLY SANDY LO AM, 0-6,: SLOPES ALDERWOOD GRA'¥£LLY SA NDY LOAl.l, 15-30:< SLOPES URBAN LAND E'¥£RETT GRA'¥£LL Y SANDY LOAM, 5-15:t SLOPES CM Engineers ~~ ~NCM8cts c«r.m.mt Pllm9l5 I.Md SuM)ffl NtJltµxx, T A COM/, S fA•TL[ ?n ~,·t, 3~1'-Sirccl, S,it , XO. locc-c, '/,/, ,8t03 2S JJ~J.2m if;. SE Occi;ectol ~.e ,uc S:ulh . SAe )]0, Sectt'e, v;A se·o, 206 2o l.242~ i(, GRAPHIC SCALE ~ 0 2~ 500 I I I Ill PITS PITS ( IN PEET ) NORTH inch = 500 fl + + + ARENTS, ALDERWOOO . . . AmC MATERIAL, • + + + • ' 6-15~ SLOPES + + + 0 0 0 00 01 0 0 0000 Sk 000 00 0 SEAffiE MUCK 000000 0 0000 0 1 ~ No NORMA SANDY LOAM REFERENCE SOURCE: WEB SOIL SURVEY, htt : websoilsurve .nrcs.usdo. ov LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL, RENTON WA AHBL JOB #: 210299.70 KING COUNTY SOILS MAP WE-2 Legend Stream Attributes / Gradient Class NO DATA --___, 1<=G<=2 .--....__., 2<=G<=4 .--....__., 4<=G<=B 8<=G<=12 12<=G<=20 -ACOMA SCATTLE 21i5 1,o'lr. }~1, St'cct, s.;1, JDC. iowno, l,A 95!03 153)53.2'12 ·EL J'6 C(c"dcotc' Av(o.t ScJ\", S.i:e 310. S,o tllc, V,A 9310! 105 .157.2'25 ·E L Fish Passage Barriers • • PARTIAL BAR RIER NORTH • NON -BARRIER GRAPHIC SCALE • NON-FISH BEARING 0 I REFERENCE SO UR CE: WDFW So lmon Scope -wdfw.wo .gov LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL, RENTON WA AHBL JOB #: 210299.70 SalmonScape MAP 750 1500 '~' ( IN FEET ) 1 Inch = 1600 ft.. WE-3 ~ Legend ~ ..--......__.., SOA STREAM -CLASS 2 SAU.40NID NORTH -------.,, MOLASSES CREEK GRAPHIC SCALE e SAO Yl£TlAND 0 250 500 I I I ( I.N FEET ) 1 inch c 500 fl REFERENCE SOURCE: KING COU NT Y iMAP -www5.kingcounty.gov ~ /1 C O IV /\ S F /\ ' T L E 2m N<Ylh JQth Street, S,ite J~~. lccc ··.o, w, 98403 7~JJBJ7'7l I ct Jlo Ccc:wM A·,er.,e South, S.il e J70, S,c ltle, WA 9810 ' 706.7o).)'1S !fl LINDBER GH HIGH SCHOOL, RENTON WA AHBL JOB #: 210299.70 KING COUNTY iMAP AppendixB Site Plan Renton High School No. 3 Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 mmm11 ;, ' : .. ,. l !.1} ' ~ "' ' ' •3 ' ' ~-,, ' " it' j, '! -' :~ -~ i= H g3? "" ' til j, ' . .. ~ N ~§ '' I I _, ' : ' • I ~' •· ~I II R " z /! • m • 1 . ~ ),:i1 ~ ' • > 3 t @) z ' • ·I i I- ~I o, f-fi ~ "' "' "l "' s ti ' d - 1 ' y ' ' ; ' "' il I I ~. (8 jiij !),•· ,, ~I ... 11 ~ ' J, ''I iz ti~ I i:I jiB t, .,;._.F 'h' !:r= 3 J l! & ,1 ' 2. • > ! I ' t( ·1.; • ,• ' jt • [ ; ~ I_ Ii C ----- 4 '-,·, -" '·' I ' 'C ' I ? • '· -......... __ ' ~ ,! JO '. 9 ' ~ ,l J< ~ 'I I1 I - Fi I '·r-~ ~ 11 I • I 1~ ·-s,ij" <{ ~ '~ I ~':: 1~ •' K-i ~ SE : • 0 i '~ I <i ' 0 j I ' I _.Jc 8 '"' it ' '' ' th r ol J' i 'lj ' ti • "'j " ,. ,c ,v I G § ~ ! \ ' '.~ . ':::·' ... -._ ! I ' .. , 1 ·} } . ' ·,.., ,~ ' [.L,--------~---,-,-\-,,,cc-,~--~-~-,-----'-''-----,'----'--(-.-----------,-.-/-'---!----------,--/-"~ ~t-·-·-, ,-,,.-· t· ._,__ ; 11 ·,1' .,, -' -~ .-y :,... AppendixC Wetland and Site Survey Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 mmm11 '·'""'"""'""'""""'""'"'v,."--,,,., ,_,t .. ')0,0,00,,-.. ,R~"'"- I ! I ! !1 I Ii i!! I I p I I ~---------~.J ~ ~ C a ~ a :l ' ~ I· ~ 11 ! I : RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT liEIIU f,P/U,1/,,W,J, ''t'c,'{•'ti:t ~~~I 1------------------------------------1 r.:'!:i~.~~;:~i ;;;a; l:lir-ii I ,.,._..,,........._ ; ', ! LINDBERGH HIGH SCHOOL I e i ;. RO,'TON AL.TA / ACSM LANO TlTLE SUR\/EY """"'·umg"11.cam - > ' a " -< 5 z a " -< " m z m -~ m m 0 :i a z " -· b ~ z m I ;; " " z ~ z ~ m • !' : ---"'ji r _ ___j ~ I • ., w:~~--!11"Jr·---------- A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4, SECTl9N 28, TOWNSHIP 23 N.; RANGE 5 E., W.M. n ·/ I ; , ="· -"' '1 L.~-----ii -~ · --~ ., ,. iL ~'t.... ------------ T --. 1\ --------_ti_ ,..,, .. .,,.,a,.,,,,,,,. ------___ I I -,v ,-,~/~1-,-,. --- f ----Ill' ..,. -... - !? < T - w -- JI[ ;.,. -1------ \ { y '! m l *ml -'I I ! H 1 i,,1 I i~ ~ f ~~! ; 1l ~lf I i li l, !l g I ..J 0 I-0 Q I g, 0 ~ en (/) ~ ~ Ii 0 (!J 0 -~ :c I g I~ z (!J ~ a: " z w ~ w tD ~ IC C z :J I AppendixD Definition of Plant Indicator Status and Wetland Determination Data Forms Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 mmm11 DEFINITION OF PLANT INDICATOR STATUS AND DATA FORMS Indicator Category Definitions OBL Obligate Wetland. Occurs almost always (estimated probability > 99 percent) under natural conditions in wetlands. FACW Facultative Wetland. Usually occurs in wetlands (estimated probability 67 to 99 percent), but occasionally found in uplands. FAC Facultative. Equally likely to occur in wetlands or uplands ( estimated probability 34 to 66 percent). FACU Facultative Upland. Usually occurs in uplands (estimated probability 67 to 99 percent), but is occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1 to 33 percent). UPL Obligate Upland. Occurs in wetlands in other regions (as defined in the National List of Scientific Plant Names), but occurs almost always ( estimated probability > 99 percent) · under natural conditions in uplands in the region specified. Species not on the list are assumed to be UPL and have an * to define these species on the data forms. NI No Indicator. These species have not been given an indicator status. They are assumed to be upland or the adjacent regional indicator status is provided with a # symbol to define these species on the data form. Source: National List of Plants That Occur In Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 88 (26.9). 89 pp. Wetland Delineation and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Report Lindbergh High School 210299.70 mmm11 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination {WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual\ Project/Site: l, ·,., cl l,e '"'.1 \.., HS Date: .:r V...(\ ,e,. Ill+ l't1~010 Applicant/owner: ~" "+o" SLhol>\ '1);5,.,.:._t County: KIW"lj State: wA lnvestilllltorfs): .,.-1, e. i't s "-l>.;_s e I<: S/f/R:S,L'J.8 fr'J. 3tJ IR 51:- Do Nonna! Circumstances exist on the site? @) no Community JD: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes @ ,wi,+ N.c.,c.l\+ Transect ID: d.11, ...... ...\,...nct. Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ® Plot ID: 1 Exolanation ofahmical or nmblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = sbrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum o/o cover Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies "11,atum % cover Indicator ":t".,l.:a..n ? lv..M. sh '.LO fJT A<1.ro~,., ,s;, ij :,D FIIC 0 l'ch<>-1'.I.. "=ss H-'.ZO f:'t+cv.. . Ree,\ c"-"'"'"'" ru.ss -1-f ~o FA-uJ -~ . HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: %of dominants 0BL, FACW, &FAC 50lo Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations --areas of prolonged inundation/saturation --Wetland plant database --Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other (exolain) Hydropbytlc vegetation present? yes ® Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? (i§J no Water Marks: yes @ Sediment Deposits: yes @- o»se.r\HA ~n,,,P.~"-1 1t ..... f\+s on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes ®' Drainage Patterns: ~ no other ( e=lain) <'!,µ,\\ Dept. ofinwidation: _Q_inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes@ Channels <12 in. ves tlffll Depth to free water in pit: --inches A/ o A.t. FAC Neutral: yes e::i Water-stained Leaves yes @) Deoth to saturated soil: inches No 1,1\Al. Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: · oto ,..,. Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes @ ...... " {:.,_ \ \ l,e ~ l,-10-10 • Rationale for decision/Remarks: /.kA.<l'j ,-IO-il SF'\.._\\ I'"-,\._\._ o{ W"--kr-.,__ ~ S v-.r-·f'd£ '(_ t>'j SOILS Map Unit Name Al d e<-woo cl (Series & Phase) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color (inches) (Munsell moist) o-3 to 't. R !l) !1.. ~-/~ IO'( ~3)'2. 1~-20 \O'/R"\)'3 ' Drainage Class mocl.er-a..:\-e.l::I we\iltlnu @ No Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil (Munsell size & contrast structure, etc. profile moistl (match description) 5; I sl ':) ,.$ I Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) /VO~ Histosol Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles ----__ Histic Epipedon __ Mg or Fe Concretions --Sulfidic Odor __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Aquic Moisture Regime __ Organic Streaking in San(jy Soils __ Reducing Conditions __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Gleved or Low-Chroma (~t) matrix Other ( exolain in remarks) Hydric soils present? yes (!!!!) Rationale for decision/Remarks: . Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes ® ® Hydric soils present? yes !; is the sampling point yes Wetland hvdrolo"" oresent? ves within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: Revised 4/97 ., DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual\ Project/Site: 1... .-n J l,e ,-~ \., HS Date: .:r u..f\ e. IO.,_ l'/1 'd..O \0 Applicant/owner: fi:.<: "-1-v f\ S<-ko,,\ l);s-1-,-,',t County: 1<..' n '.! State: wA Investfaator<s): --n, .. ,..s..._ l>.;_se I,:: S/1'/R:s,..'J.1!1 fr'J.:,tJ IR 5 1=- Do Nonna! Circumstances exist on the site? @ no Conununity ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ® N+ ,cc.-u,.'I-Transect ID: d.'s~c. ls the area a potential Problem Area? yes ®I> Plot!D: '2.... Exnlanation of atypical or nroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum %cover Indicator Dominant Plant Sn,,cies Stratum % cover Indicator ~w""' 50 J:'Rc..wfi /'t o,.i-o.s~S ~~1:.s 1-\ Ile. So ·H-r--,...s h. H 1.0 Fkw C-: ... ~ \. ho-r~e-+ ... ; \ ~ ?...D flkl,,) 5o-\ l'YlO" be.r-r'-' ?h '.l. 0 f::f/-cw ... HYDROPID!TIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, PACW, & PAC \DO 7c, Check all indicators that apply & explain below: ' Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations --areas of prolonged inundation/saturation ...L.... Wetland plant database --Morphological adaptations --Personal lmowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other ( exnlain) Hydrophytlc vegetation present? (3> no . Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDJOLOGY Is it the growing season? ~ no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no· ~"""'"j .,.1 .... -."'<.S on Based on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no other (explain) DepL of inundation: _a_ inches Oxidized Root_ (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in. ves no Depth to free water in pit: 0 inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes no Denth to saturated soil: ~ inches 5..._('"-S:ull!:. s,-."\-. Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial 1>hotoo:ranhs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? @ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: ~-10-10 -.., .. ~~ .(:1,,..,,,.'.!, 0 vu· s1.e1:. .{:..,,.._ ~-\-\ ... "\ 'i'I <4':!.a '3 c.: ,-1'1·1" -~ '"" ...... "'! \IJ o-"k...r-s ..... , ... 'le. 'I-.. o.,.\o'""'I .,._"\--+.,-._ o{° sl<>+t SOILS MapUnitName Al,le~wood (Series & Phase) Profile Descriotlon Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors (inches) (Munsell (Munsell moist) moist) - o-~ 10 'II<-'/ I 1-b ~ .5 '\ ll-5/i . G-IC) ~.S'\1','2/J f't..~ is-\ _, :ON<, .. d, . .\ o~\ 0...-1-:\ Hydrlc Soll Indicators: (check all that apply) . ' Histosol --__ Histic Epipedon _____L Sulfidic Odor _____':c'.'.'.' Aquic Moisture Regime ~ Reducing Conditions v Gleyed or Low·Chroma (-1) matrix Hydrie soils present? ® no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? ®' no Hydric soils present? ~ no Wetland hydroloi,v present? no Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: Drainage Class fY!od.e.r-o..h,I~ weHJ.,.. @ No Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match description) s; I '3 5 \ '3 s I Matrix chroma :S 2 with mottles --__ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other t ~vnlain in remarks) . Is the sampling point @) no within a wetland? Revised 4/97 . DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination fvV A State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Co-s Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: L. (n cl be r~ 1-,, HS Date: .:; "'-" e 10+ 1'1,~0\0 Applicant/owner: R< "+o"' s._1-,,o,,\ p;5-h-:,t County: State: Jc.lnj wA Investfoat""s\: -rJ..~~$"-1> .... s .. l,c S1TIR:h~8 /r~3tJ IR 5 b- Do Normal Circumstances exist ou the site? @ no Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes @ ,,.+ l"C-.1\+ Transect ID: d. fs ..._\:tAN: C. Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes <!lll> Plot ID: '-f Bxolanation of atvoical or nroblem area: VEGETATIQN (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum %cover Indicator Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum % cover Indicator C o-+\ovu.ooo c\ Sh 5 07<, PA-c. -spru-,.<\-,"q ~m. ro<>\ ) 1,;...,.1:,,, .. . si-v-,..ps. R.ec\ o~; e ~ AJ>.wa:,l SI.. fl07o t::A-LW So# r "'-Sh.. I,\ M FActo.). HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC 100711 Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations -- areas of prolonged inundation/saturation v Wetland plant database -- Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge ofregional plant communities -- Technical Literature Other f=Jain\ Hydrophytlc vegetation present? @ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: CP *"" woo.I. ~s (l. .... ~ w:%.'"' I"-!. 1 !)e(.I...S,Df1. w,,.,J ch_lf1S ,O~t--t!...f\'4.-,'N_ ........... HYDROLOGY · Is it the growing season? ® no Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no· ~,-,,yJ: .. ~ ~'"'-" +..r OU Based on: soil temp (record temp \ Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes no other (exnlain) · Dept. of inundation: --inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in, ves no Depth to free water in pit: --inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained Leaves yes no Deoth to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: --Aerial ohotooranhs: Other: Wetland hydrology present? ® no Rationale for decision/Remarks: 11,-,0-10 r..,,J4Li<..t-.~Of"j'¥'\ . ..\.e ~~\,OV\ c~r--'-1'1W;v,.~ ~ ~" '\-01/<.,-+kt.. S \j.t' ,e,_ • 1,-1~-•v C.0£'-'k<'" f\.O"l'-~foWlil.u tiv,ef" S loo"-· i'n,~e.l W""-+tr- ~ SOILS Map Unit Name A I cl e ~"' oo c1 (Series & Phase) Prollle Description Depth Horizon Matrix color (inches) (Munsell moist) 0-\\ 10'( R. 'ii/ 11-20. \o 'l R ')jQ Mottle colors (Munsell moist) IO'{ R. S/ b . Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol -- __ Histic Epipedon ___L Sulfidic Odor --=:::::·Aquic Moisture Regime ~ Reducing Conditions .......-Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=l) matrix Hydric soils present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? i no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hvdroloov oresent? no Rationale/Remarks: . NOTES: Drainage Class /Ylod.e. r-0..:!:-e.l ;:1 we.lld,..,_. . Field observations confinn @ No ma ed ? Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match descriJ11ign) gs I M { l' ~s l Matrix chroma ::; 2 with mottles --__ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other (exnlain in remarks) . Is the sampling point '® no within a wetland? Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corn.• Wetland Delineation Manual Project/Site: L,"n J \,er~\.-, HS Date: .::r ...... i\ ... 10 + 1'1 1 t.to 10 Applicant/owner: F:< "+o" s._ 1-o,, I t>;s-1-1-:,t County: ..,_; "!! State: wA lnvestfaator(si: -rJ,e.N. S "-l>.;_se I,;; . S/1'/R:S.-._'J.8 /r'J.3/J IR 5 i,- Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? @) no Connnunity JD: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes @ ,,.+ ........ t Transed!D: cl\i,,.A.. .. ~c Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ®> Plot!D: 3 Exolanation of atvnical or nroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) Dominant Plant Species Stratum % cover Indicator Dominant Plant Snecies Stratum % cover Indicator ~'""~"'CJ't-lu..r.s .4_ ~~·f-;,c ",~ . 1-\ iO i=l!(W)Ak - 'B,,.i\.e.r,..._p 1-\ !lo l=i\l lO C o.{'f!... 5 l>. \.4 3o l=lkl,) . S.,{+ ""-~h. I\ ?..o 4'=-llcw HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: ., % of dominants OBL, FACW, & PAC \ oo '7v Check all indicators that apply & explain below: .. Visual observation of plant species growing in Physiological/reproductive adaptations --areaa of prolonged inundation/saturation L..--Wetland plant databaae --Morphological adaptations. --Personal knowledge of regional plant connnunities --Technical Literature Other (exolain) Hydropbytlc vegetation present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? @) no Water Marks: @ no Sediment Deposits: yes @) 5 rp...., '"'1 "\u..'f'"<5 on Baaed on: soil temp (record temp ) Drift Lines: yes® Drainage Patterns; @ no other (explain) Dept. ofinundation: 3±-inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no Channels <12 in.li11!lP no Depth to free water in .pit: +inches FAC Neutral: yes~ Water-stained Lesves yes no Death to saturated soil: inches Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream, Lake or gage data: Oto Other: Wetland hydrology present? yes no ~1 0 _,,:.,~ .',do e.:.dc~b .... ,;"'-5 Rationale for decision/Remarks: G,-1P-\O w, .. 'k.t-P""~\eJ "l..-<, 1• d~e: p -1A ~ ('.d..$5, G,-l'-1-10 w~~,-f"" !.e,\ ~-~ ,. duf. . SOILS Map Unit Name Al d .._.-uioo cl (Series & Phase) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color (inches) (Munsell moist) o-3 \O'tlt".lj I Mottle colors (Munsell moist) s-'I C M.<.6, ~ 'J <·,u,e..\ l.j -s \o'lRQ/1 IO'ltz 5/1,, l'e. -'-f-u. s ' _\ d_....._t., ' 0 ~ ,.....,_~ ..... \ . Hydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply) Histosol --__ Histic Epipedon -L Sulfidic Odor .......-Aguie Moisture Regime ~ Reducing Conditions v Gleyed or Low-Chroma(=!) matrix Hydrlc soils present? yes no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Drainage Class mode.r-o..:\-:e,I~ 1,i<H<;ir>u -Field observations confirm @ No ma ed e? Mottle abundance · Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil si7.e & contrast structure, etc. profile (match ge§llril!tion) . s; I -a~~ m "-1'\'i, , 11-r-oil"II. ~s l ~ 1 ... c.: .. I-\-;\\ -+~ \\ \..._'f<l.1', Matrix chroma :,; 2 with mottles --Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List Other ( exnlain in remarks) . ,!.....,;lv.J 5.._,-~"-C~ 5,,: I..S h,:,,1-o~:,..._\\':) K."'I0~.1' G-<'<>--JI\~ 'l"CLU'd 1 .... 't"f..r h.i..r--r-:ieA "'-f\c\.c.t--3" o{ GiCii, ,la• J .s; I+. ' Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? <J§r) no Hydric soils present? ~ no Is the sampling point ~ no Wetland hydroioov oresent? no within a wetland? Rationale/Remarks: 1--I ,' S '1-,,--r: C... !, w o,J e... j>e. t-0 \ cl__ 'tt:> jl D fVI.Af5. ti>-\ '\ "'4. 4 f?:H.J"\--h.._ ~ h,'.., h ' COi\ 'lod·. ( f"O(\. = NOTES: / . Revised 4/97 DATA FORM 1 (Revised) Routine Wetland Determination (WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corns Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: l:n cl ber~ I-, HS Date: J" "'"" e. 10+. l'l,~010 Applicant/owner: R" "+c," s ... hoo\ -o;s'H-1,t County: 1c.' "j State: wA lnvesti2ator<s): -r-1,._,..s..__ D<Ase I<:: S/f/R:~'l.8 /r'l.3tJ IR. 51:- Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? @ no Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (atypical situation)? yes ® ""+ l'CcJc.t\ ... Transect ID: d.~+-o-lo...nc-e. Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes ®> Plot ID: 5 Exolanation of atvnical or nroblem area: VEGETATION (For strata, indicate T = tree; S = shrub; H = herb; V = vine) - Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum %cover Indicator Dominant Plant S--ies Stratum %cover Indicator Rel os:e.-cl •• .,,.,,,.! s" 3070 l=l\cw l'u'\\O(\wOO .\. .,.-'liJ7o Fite.. "50--\mo"ber-<''1 Sh. ,07o 'FA{.\,\) e, .... ~e.--c~~ 1-\ :I ti 7o Fl\-u.J AMU-:c..n \,..,..u,'"'<-H-~07u OBL HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS: % of dominants OBL, FACW, & FAC \ 0 t:J '1.c, Check all indicators that apply & explain below: Visual observation of plant species growing in PhysiologicaVreproductive adaptations --areas of prolonged inundation/saturation ~ Wetland plant database --Morphological adaptations --Personal knowledge of regional plant communities --Technical Literature Other foxolain) Hydrophytlc vegetation present? @) no Rationale for decision/Remarks: HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? ® no Water Marks: ® no Sediment Deposits: yes @) -pl .... •-\s ~ "'""'"j on Based on: soil terop (record temp ) other (exolain) Drift Lines: yes® Drainage Patterns: yes@ Dept. ofinundation: _Q_inches Oxidized Root (live roots) Locsl Soil Survey: yes@ Channels <12 in. ves dlli) Depth to free water in pit: _:Q___ inches s"'-rfo..( -e. FAC Neutral: yes <!'!> Water-stained Leaves yes ~ Deoth to saturated soil: n inches s .... '\-V..ro-\ ~oV'\ Check all that apply & explain below: Other (explain): Stream Lake or ~age data: --lil.Jlrial ohotoITTaohs:, Other: Wetland hydrology present? ®' no Rationale for decision/Remarks: . SOILS MapUnitName Alde<-wood (Series & Phase) Profile Description Depth Horizon Matrix color (inches) (Munsell moist) o-~ ~ )O'\ ~2J I .:2.-Qo 10'( R.~a.. . Mottle colors (Munsell moist) 7-S'i RS//,. Hydric Soll Indicators: ( check all that apply) Histosol --__ Histic Epipedon Sulfidic Odor --~ Aquic Moisture Regime -=. Reducing Conditions ,,,,-Gleyed or Low-Chroma (=I) matrix Hydrlc soils present? ~ no Rationale for decision/Remarks: Wetland Determination (circle) Hydrophytic vegetation present? i no Hydric soils present? no Wetland hvdroloov oresent? no Rationale/Remarks: NOTES: Drainage Class n1o~e.r-o..hl~ we.ndr.u Field observations confirm ~ No d e? Mottle abundance . Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil size & contrast structure, etc. profile (match description) ~. s: l IV\ ~ " s: I Matrix chroma S 2 with mottles _ Mg or Fe Concretions __ High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils __ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils __ Listed on National/Local Hydric Soils List · . Other ( exolain in remarks) ' . Is the sampling point ® no within a wetland? Revised 4/97 Printed: 03-10-2011 Payment Made: CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA11-012 03/10/2011 08:31 AM Receipt Number: ;~,I~ '~8n ton "1i_1 C\, ... ;.:-;i0n R1100774 Total Payment: 1,030.00 Payee: Renton School District #403 Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check ll05 1,030.00 Account Balances Amount 30.00 1,000.00 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee 5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.000000.007.345 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review 5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat 5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD 5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 ooo.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE -USE 3954 5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .oo .oo .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .oo .00 .00