Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA81-097 (2)
BEGINNING OF FILE FILE ITIE ! ----... ''i,,, ,, i ; 4 ^ CITY OF RENTON , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERHIT _``.1: `' ' ;a ;. t, i J. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY -�/ . / File No . SP- 09 -�!� Date Rec' d. //` 30�-2( ~Application Fee $ Receipt No . � - -` `'' Environmental Review Fee $ _ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Namel The Austin Company Phone (206) 226-8800 Address 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, Washington 98055\ 2 . Property location Southwest of S.W. 19th Street midway between -East Valley Road and Lind Ave. S.W. 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) All of Blocks 5 and 6 , C. D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division Nn, 1. according to the Plat recorded in Volume I 17 , Page 74 in King County, Washington. 1\ . \ . Number of acres or square feet 9 . 9 AC Present Zoning G What do you propose to develop on this property? i72 y-rz—r--, e- iL ry rc'- Pc -r i //lr oa-a• G y /=rvL 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' ' B. Prking, landscaping and screening plan 1 " = 1.0 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" .= 200 ' to 800 ' D. Bailding height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307. 5 in addition to the above. 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept . 1-77 •' OF R 4$ " BUILDING.& ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR n l co- 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9 SEP1E���P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM March 12, 1984 TO: Maxine Motor, City Clerk FROM:(' ]Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Austin Company, Special Permit SP-097-81 The applicant, the Austin Company, has not followed through with this application for a special permit to fill the subject site. No action has occurred on the application since December,. 1981. Therefore, this application file is being transmitted to your office for placement with the permanent records. RJB:JMS/dm Revision 3/1981 /91/4/ • RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appl ' cation: SPECZeliCAMAI_ire:5P.097`-2.) Re'&Iest?cora sto >>'eet si4 /II lite :F' *to ostt al/Ma aO®® e.vdt,1• iA pr o roetteew 4 Loca ion: App1 cant: 1911VilpP�®elm iy TO: D Public Works Department ®Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:JO21// '8® Traffic Eng. Division � SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 1/// ®Utilities Eng., Division Fire Department ®Parks Department ®Build. J Department olice Department Others: COMM NTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT NG. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON I- ,Iaatiegl • - REVI WING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE ®Approved a Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved 1) No hau ingoon Saturdays or Sundays unless the Austin Co. pays the cost of a traffic officer to monitor the site. We do not have enough people to monitor the sine on weekends & this is when truck companies try to haul overweight. 2) $5, 000 cash bond be posted to pay for street cleanup, when the company does not clean up the street when asked. 3) Hours of operation 0630 AM to 0230 PM 4) Street cleaning equip. on the site at all times-, & keep the street clean of debri at all times. DATE: Sign. ture of Director or Authorized Representative 5) Route to & from the site be designated by Police dept. REVIELING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ❑Approved J Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved 6) Seperate entrance and exit road to the site. . Exit road - be paved. 'at least 150 feet just prior to exit onto city street-. Exit roadway 'have a grated area for trucks to stop on and wash wheels prior to entry onto roadway.This is necessary due. to the extremely wet conditions that exist in the area. On Austi ' s previous fill in the area we had . a lot of trouble & the company hauli g did not cooperate so that at times we had mud 3 to 4 inches thick on the r adway and racked as far away as Lind & Grady Way. Signa ure of erector or Authorized Representative - ------- --- DATE: -42/-15/81 Revision 3/1981 4/62/M/157 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Applic tion: f /4 , AinlTTsp_o47--ad Re?vestAerP// Svhje4si f e %/l allie // DdO G.ydk. ihpr0142 rf*d.1 4r W c o I �eve1gp.«®nt Location: c� ro'�.SW/9 � j .a& /4yi41 L Applicant: ADø ,, Gimp gn r TO: ®Public Works Department ®En eering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:440A / raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: lS74 ®Utilities Eng. Division ®Fire Department ®Parks Department Building Department ® Police Department ®Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON • _A:y.7a/8/ REVIEWS NG DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /7LF l £ iLJ C j N L L- Approved ® Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved /1 t s -r- `7' ,._v /^ d) 2 - //g7 DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ;Approved ;Approved with Conditions ; Not Approved • DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 / ./iDt;1 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET App1 ' cation: x r ,.i %% :'_ O 07� ®®11? .. iocrILAilred „f. ,. 114,{ °.;re.2/14.MO c yd Apr s?a► eafs 4r4011 Location: ZegleekriteriotAgotagSLCY Pse• ®tly4AL • Appl cant: &Skin `:. Amp gapty TO: ®Public Works Department ®Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:/C /WM ®Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:4�4 ®Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks R artment uilding Department El Police Department El Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:_ ['Approved ® Approved with Conditions `I Not Approved lcJ/L-t- su s-rrak_ri- /a c, -t--k . 3-7-oaz Aco _ S' // a/o 4-AL7 /0 (10/ _ G _ DATE: Sign. ture of D' or or Authorized Representative REVIE'4ING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ®Approved Approved with Conditions 1 Not Approved _ DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 • /4/4/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: ' �4e64 .{,Y.ere L O #�, Apidi Sokeete ee fA 4onotpa4tee.t// A l ,6% byttlatzre_A•Ao_iarvoi Location:frYel� d E�i �� 'eirtier 10-ta4 621 .. o 0®/ ,w• to Applicant: RASIkei - s:"hipatt ir TO : ®Public Works Department ®Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:122/B/8/ []Traf ° • Eng. Division ••. r SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: e0/51.. . tilities Eng. Division 0 ire Department ['Parks Department ElBuilding Department 0 Police Department ® Others: COMM°NTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON AP.9 1 90:g, • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: cli- e_. 1)T Approved 0 Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved i ' DATE: 7o2 " //- r/ Sian ture of Direc or or Authorized presentative REVIE4ING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1Ar<<-' --( 9 ' pproved EiApproved with Conditions ONot Approved Sv1,aS_IC�� to l'a 'P2o Lic-) c47iLi r7 Pc..'3iv,3 - , ______ __ __ . ._ ___ _ __ _ _ ___________DATE._ __/2 1 l�_0 _________ SfanaAre ofI Director or Authorized Representative i Revision 3/1981 lait)164/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appl ' cation. spec, iz 1rC aj / es�7,161079/ sbilieeirsee /, $ited.mOVela °eibi /A ,".%® c•y elk. sue, ropiii reAtedoi garcat coDttiwLocatioai"1��I d !$ei�iSi®0t. - �3 -Cer — �•� ®4 �1• Y _a_Applicant: &VI ay TO: 0 Pub1 i c W ks Department ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:1�I® '/�® A ®Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 4,4Jc/ ®Utilities Eng. Division ®Fire Department ®Parks Department 0 Building Department 0 Police Department ®Others: . COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON _AAP al,/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Ei Approved 0 Approved with Conditions .': Not Approved /) .,e ;•.-f-erm-- '-s4r.r--.1.- f, ..%." ___.. ./4- )41-- c„),:_e_e°r°64:_et „„e.,;t1"-owee...t. t 4_ sew DATE: /z,///��/ Signature of Director or Aut rized Representat M , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ®Approved ®Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved _ DATE: Signature of Director or Au_thorized Repre_sentative FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SP-097-81 environmental Checklist No. : ECF-104-81 1escription of Proposal : Request to fill site in the amount of +118 ,000 cubic yards to prepare for future commercial development. Proponent : Austin Company 1 location of Proposal: Southwest corner of S.W. 19th Street and East Valley Road. ,Lead Agency: Building & Zoning Department. his proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 16, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building & Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: David Clemens, Ronald Nelson, Richard Houghton, James Hanson, Roger > laylock, James Matthew, Steve Munson, Gary Norris. ncorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings f the ERC on application ECF-104-81 are the following: ' ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: December 15 , 1981 2) Applications : SP-097-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Utilities Engineering Division, Fire Department, Traffic Engineering Division. Recommendations for a declaration of significance: Zoning Division, Design Engineering Division, Building Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does have significant adverse impact on he environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . this decision was made after review by the lead agency of complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental significance: The proposal will have a major impact on (1 ) topography (2) ater and water courses , (3) plant life, (4 ) population and Employment, (5) public services, and (6) utilities. Signatures : ,%,:e41;;Z :, onald G. Nelson vid R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director i I 'F,),,_,.ck'kc ," ,(/--L c fe- Ridhard C. Houghton, Public Works Director LATE OF PUBLICATION: December 21 , 1981 11 XPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: January 4 , 1982 Date circulateu : Comments due : ENll'lREPOW 'TAL CUECKEIST R[ if[E4, BEET ECF - 104 _ 81 APPLICATION No (s ) . SP-097-81 PROPONENT : Austin Company PROJECT TITLE : Brief Description of Project : Request to fill site in the amount of +118 , 000 cubic yards to prepare for future commercial development. LOCATION : Srnnthwest corner of S.W. 19th Street & ' East Valley Road. SITE AREA : BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X 3 ) Water & water courses : X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal lire : ? X 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X I 8 ) Land Use ; north : east. . south : vest : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : x 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment: : X 12 ) Number of Dveilings : X 13 ) Trip ends ( IlL ) : 4720 @ 25 cubic yards/load t r a f f i c impacts : Major - plus future development 14 ) Public services : • X 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities : X 17 ) Human health : X 18 ) Aesthetics : ? 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : �. Flood storage, utilities , current and future traffic and land use. Recommendation : DNS ! DOS X ) e Infor cat. o ------ Reviewed by : Date . FORM: ERC-06 ��� "��'`"rl L'SV YF : i v PROPOSED ACTION RFOIIFST TO FIB I SITF IN THE AMOUNT nF +112.nfO CUBIC YARDS Tn PRFPARF ,FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT GENER L LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS SOUTHWEST CORNER OF S .W. 19TH STREET AND EAST VAIIFY ROAD P o=STED TO Nis TIFY INTERESTED P RSONS OF AN EVRNMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RE . TON . VIRDNMEi%ITAL REVIEW/ COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ', AS m,ETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION, ';'4% DOES DDDES DT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVF=RSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRON- MENT. A ENVIRONMENT' .L IMPACT STATEMENTS ®WILL, NOT, BE RE- °UIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:O3 P.M', JANUARY 'I, 1982 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-255D DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON T e Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of n.n-significance for the following projects: McCARTHY, TERRANCE (ECF-105-81) Application for conditional use permit to allow use of condominium unit in R-4 zone for professional office (computer leasing business) , file CU-098-81; property located at Unit #204 of Benson Condominiums, 1425 South Puget Drive. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION (ECF-106-81) Application for special permit to fill site in the amount of approxi- mately 12,000 cubic yards of fill material to build a fire access roadway, file SP-099-81; property located at 2423 Lind Avenue S.W. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has also issued a final declaration of significance for the following project: AUSTIN COMPANY (ECF-104-81) Application for special permit to fill site in the amount of approxi- mately 118,000 cubic yards of fill material to prepare for future commercial development, file SP-097-81; property located at the southwest corner of S.W. 19th Street and East Valley Road. Fu ther information regarding these actions is available in the Building an. Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by Ja uary 4, 1982. Pu.lished: December 21, 1981 Date circulated : ©099/6/*/ Comments due : sAPAS 9/ /�,� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET L PPLICATION No (s ) . Sil�il'elV72 ROPONENT : likkWill CAftipaity 7OJECT TITLE : .specho�! RE-di:Air Brief Description of Project : &pee 4161/Strod4yeela/Y4P ?PI eeQ itsa til#et' t //g di,(()Holt. pitre0�'�®pt �'o pPc-erir! Omar ea ale we %o� e.„ LOCATION . '-:_. z - e'. '{ill f 171 i* de SITE AREA : ± 9 let ere BUILDING AREA (gross ) EVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air • quality : `/' 3) Water & water courses : ye 4 ) Plant life : ,/' 5 ) Animal life : ye 6) Noise : ✓' Light & glare : ✓• 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : j/' 1 ) Risk of upset : ye 11 ) Population/Employment : V 1 ) Number of Dwellings : 1 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 1 f f 13 ) Energy : '.--'' 16 ) Utilities : 117 ) Human health : V 1 ) Aesthetics : 1r ) Recreation : V 20 ) Archeology/history : '/- COMMENTS : R commendation : DOS More Information R viewed by : I( litle : 1>171L./71. C''P6"'`c`_ D to : 121"A i F RM: ERC-06 \1 1J Date circulated : itAideoh Comments due : APA0424,/ ENVIRONMEINITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - / '/ - 9/ . APPLICATION No (s ) . 5.12'04P7';'fl PROPONENT : nalihn cow #t y F[fiROJECT TITLE : .5Pe/4j 14E4rAlir rief Description of Project : � ifele ' itclic r 'eef‘SiVp • • 1 eitvisi wee o wee•22 a�o I'wig 11- 9 c,' ii ae l4 ,Qd LOCATION : / ITE AREA : �.4PCRICIeS BUILDING AREA (gross) e•o DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE • INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : _ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : `.,' 3 ) Water & water courses : t.,// 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : c� 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts.: View obstruction : / 9 ) Natural resources : (/ i 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Numberrof Dwellings : ./ 13 ) .Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 1 ) Public services : 9 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : �^ '1 ) Recreation : f 20 ) Archeology/history : CIMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI v DOS More Information -2Reviewed by : ,i`.,�. — i it le : c;r in s pr D t e : /el V f (- F0 FO : ERC-06 i r' Date circulated : /amige Comments due : ®aAs/g/ - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEIW SHEET EC - / - 9 AP LICATION No (s ) . ..5/1"Q11"7®W PR PONENT : flu.�'1 ,i Company, PROJECT TITLE : .5 ( /4d . RERAPur Brlief Description of Project : RepelhOthAlig 014ifeCiAgiVe • bt #edit Neevt ef t /Jg, dO(v4i.`t yards 7S ,914,1•1 rPL#vr LOCATION : Skiegorwa tog.. or Sled,7 ,.,44_, e r wsioljejlerogis d SITE AREA : ± 9.9Qcs'e BUILDING AREA (gross) -•. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 40'.°T® 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : P< 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north :JMJ4elop.J east : „��®C7 south : SPiV/•e a XhIrle West : lh etfel Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 1, /''' 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : / � / ' 11 ) Population/Employment : /v 12i Number of Dwellings : v/ 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : Li7ta0ifeac ,fripSC0 �, aptie,w.d) . traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : _ 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : ' li, , 20 ) Archeology/history : V ,COMMENTS :°Aty frylidt(Woe 11.r wis4flat Ille/due e 4 arat Qe Cat tiPSCC $ ail ® Ua�re c�ATle ®n �1®1.cbier? a�-�/c-- 1s0r mte .epd•e.e4,0 . Recommendation : DNSI_ DOS 4..00"-- More Information._ Reviewed by :%.5- !'Ve#0004 Title : AS'S 40 - _ ' Da e : �Ply/SA I' FO , : ERC-06 Date circulated : ,0:/®®/Av Comments due : APAPer/8/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - / 9 _ RI APPLIAPPLICATION No (s ) . ,1:4'40Q'���® CATION : jam Ctilkyti.it RROJECT TITLE : spe- /4/ /Arr rief Description of Project : Repiett 71e6lig044feelAgeY! aitejAILLpiadvivezt&e&furt fsre.s 1 de ire a�N+ 'e- O C A T I O N : S�Cprr tel. der ��®y�a7, e 142 447/41. • ITE AREA : ± 9,%teres BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : k. 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : x 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : . 9 ) Natural resources : T 10 ) Risk of upset : X' 1 ) Population/Employment : 1 ) Number of Dwellings : X 1 lb ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 1? ) Utilities : 1 ) Human health : �' 1 ) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : '\ COMMENTS : /`L 6cA gSTAurtI LLci 12. :70LtC.. — TZ_ 7O2L 1,0 7:).- ?Z / d7v2.4,�: i S. ,'V Cl/b 14 -7x°A ®1 - r 0,0c:7T-o Fie2eD «/s-ae4A/6 r4;1-10 JS' R commendation : NSI_ DOS X More Information_ R viewed by : , � /4;1�av l itle : QaQ G,l/(a J� D to : /a-f ---d71 1 F RM: ERC-06 Date circulated : iro ®®/ Comments due : /451/841 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - py - R/ APPLICATION No (s ) . 6. OP7 n1 / PROPONENT : jJ1 c bg>124 p a fly —fiPROJECT TITLE : ,5perhim i7 Brief Description of Project : Rep tr.it Atcliggli'eC1 / 4) '.' is : 2 tiblf iii t ifig ta®!)(0141' pter4t esolr 1014reV rt oc Asi few,1viore 72- .a .�• Sift)eoett obi. or S4.10,7gawe.a: A V&,,,leidAy Al, SITE AREA : ± 9.4heentS BUILDING AREA (gross) 1 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : t� 3) Water & water courses : t..r 4 ) Plant life : f/ 5 ) Animal life : , ✓ 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : ✓ 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : ✓ 11 ) Risk of upset : ✓ 11 ) Population/Employment : ,/ 1' ) Number of Dwellings : ir li ) Trip ends CITE ) : traffic impacts : 1 ) Public services : I ✓ 1. ) Energy : ✓ 1. ) Utilities : 1 ) Human health : `� 1 : ) Aesthetics : • 1 - ) Recreation : ✓ 21 ) Archeology/history : CIMMENTS : R: commendation : DNSI DOS >( More Information_ R- viewed by :(1h-.4 4L--` Title : 70 D: te : /Z/ i//f FERM: ERC-06 1 Date circulated : • //Q/ Comments due : /,?//� ,fir y ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET PPLICATION No (s) . SA6ngi°76'leif ROPONENT : , iii AAA { PROJECT TITLE : -'7" e.,,,,, 14c: .! a Brief Description of Project : Resy8? ' '611SRdi•eC'la/V@ Pi 1 e,ort ma f! l! t d a(Diet yderis 1s ((t o#�errwfvr com oWvD' ®a I ewe ago Pie � LOCATION : •phi deer ss �0— i s' ,y4=a . v.'t$ kpiVd. SITE AREA : ± Cl ? reS BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : g/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : G/ 3 ) Water & water courses : n..,--- 4 ) Plant life : v---- 5 ) Animal life : 4,..--- 6 ) Noise : C—./ 7 ) Light & glare : Z/ 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : t,------ • . 1 ) Risk of upset : 1 ) Population/Employment : 4,.� 1I ) Number of Dwellings : �- l 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : iF�°S"7/"1 e0Ca 77°0e %7A-r/ C %V .I ) i traffic impacts : (A)i L,�; �)( C� O-t le.., 1i,,. _( S `' 1 ) Public services : /� 15 ) Energy : �/ 18 ) Utilities : ------- 17 ) Human health : 1.------ 18 ) Aesthetics : 1 . . 17 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : • L.-'°® CMMENTS : R; commendation : DNSI v DOS More Information_ R: viewed by : d , , �-`� �� Title : �/�� �� S ►a it 5 D te : 1 1I `i / 3 / F RM: ERC-06 d � , ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEN COMMITTEE DECEMBER 16 , 1981 AGE ni COMMENCING AT 10 : 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 11EW BUSINESS ECF-104-81 AUSTIN COMPANY SP-097-81 Application for special permit tofill subject site in the amount of +118,000 cubic yards to prepare for future commercial development; property located at the southwest corner of S.W. 19th Street and East Valley Road. ECF-105-81 McCARTHY, TERRANCE C. CU-098-81 Application for conditional use premit to allow use of a condominium unit, located in a R-4 zone, as a professional office; property located at 1425 Puget Drive S.E. , Suite 204 . ECF-106-81 MOBILE OIL CORPORATION SP-099-81 Application for special permit to fill site in the amount of +12 ,000 cubic yards in building a roadway for fire access and protection; property located in the vicinity of 2423 Lind Avenue S.W. ECF-108-81 LINCOLN PROPERTY R-100-81 Application for rezone from P-1 and "G" to R-3 for future multiple family development of 186 units ; property located on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N. , south of N. 24th Street. CANDLEWOOD RIDGE Proposal for a planned unit development for 406 multiple-family dwellings ; property located north of S.E. Petrovitsky Road and between 148th Avenue S. E. and 152nd Avenue S.E. (CF/CHG Associates Number Three) . • _\ nil _ 1) - It • .(4/ ! 7 I . ._ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - .4- ildi • • COMMITTEE 3j •.,, 1 b .___N DECEMBER 1 6, 1981 / /. 'I ,,,,Ip ( i ! ' ' 1. • )------ (---- • , . L-, L \ LINCOLN PROPERTY •L--- ,_..(c-...„-, , , ,—, I i , \ WASHINGTON \.'• : i . ,1 ig,•to, , .7 1_,. ; rh•; \..,,,,....„, , 2- I ; 1--- _ V . 12114 ' L • _ ----c-r,- 4 I , . i \ 'i/ \\ Illik 1 ' , 1,. ._11-1---7, --.-.-- '--1-1I \ .7_1-_!7:-\---j C r ---1:1 I 1-1-.-,2 !' 1 !!! ir!!!1! i,........-. !mop --, i !' ! 0 ! I-1 --•...I • n f j I 1 I / \ i Hr- .,,_,-------),\• ,..., L-- 1, _,-1 ,•• • „ _ ,_ ilia , .Er • ...N.\ ., , , ---_..„.., , ----_--_-_:- '....„.441, • , '.•_--;--_-,-;-.‘___ _____ AN ' ,, ,, , , _lit, . .__. (- ____r_i_ , • ‘ , 1 L , --) - ; • ••,-,--.2._.,.. —1- . . . . „ ...... , /,-,...c • •i_____-- . ) _ ,, •( \ : ‘,1 -1 - \-• 1 ___,--- • .. . r ', • -- --.. ---.---------- -,,,din)._, ...„.,..„- • . ,. , ‘,,.., ____,,, A,--,.._ ••• -•-,-,,,,y,----,. .., __) . •,,_ .,„ • %,. ..- ,..,..„. . , ---_-- .: \ •, i' , 'tlitir- ' -' 1111 AUSTIN COMPANY '..f.i, '-' — IFII •- /17- , ."75--4--.. i .\If 1 k .e...::. , i ....., ..._. ,,____...,..______ .,:.. McCARTHY ' ,,-----) •\-.-= --I I'---- \ 1 -111 MOB' E OIL C.ORPORATION .@,`"''.4 il 1 _i_._....i__: st"----4-1, i 11 ihi ',-- -1-.‘• . . • ';1 1 / i i • . • g : , Il ii N'yililL.,.t._ ilA ,--i, :::":-._ i 1 •• LI ..J I I ' f 7...,_-_-_______---,,__i • . ____ __ _ ____ _ ----t' il .i. i ,-,,,.„„,.___ 1 J I CANDLEWOOD RIDGE 'Z'; - . 1 ..,..01''.. i 1 r\ 1 11 i . , — ; ; 1 i _-'....---------\\ , 1 if I ::',,, .1 i 1 1._ _„,.. 1 T, f 4 "e.`", . H : 1 , .1.-.' ----" \ _.---- I r 1 1 . I - -- -- - - • _ ____./ H 1 I // _, 1 --- I 7: ' . -• ''''t-) i : 4 , iv 1 . • _ . „," 1 ; ' '' i , 1 ) -111-1( _ 1.1 .___ __ __ _ , ; -,_ _ A AA:Ak•n \ .., •'V.. .!-:11----4 - - — -— -_ -_ • ---- i101 1-' !P. F.._ .., C• I 1 .:3 i \ ' ;1,44 ,t I( .1 i . • C I ...?-2 di 0 ai AI 11 II ' \- - 9 n' 1/40 i.o 1 * ; , 211 '2 i \ ....„.............7): til t ..:.............._ : ... _ --__ "111S2 0' -------------------lor• o`,4%,,Noji,: __ F21.-061(.. ' 4 4,:...^. 4.1- :71, •".111 11.1,11.-t_.— ro,..•nr.:71 '....I C ?.••,- • ..--........—.__.,_,_.---.— ...... ...........01_ ...,.. SITE PLAN J3 FILL SECTIONS ...... 79 _ al --------- •- ------------- ------- ----- -- - • - -- THE AUSTIN 99 99_ _______ COMPANY .„_,L21,_,,_ ..... VALLEY OFFICE a INaktuag_LFARK__ ..... c 2 ...i A..9 ---------- --------- -- .—--—— ..r. •ft.....NENTONWASH. .IPAI A - ----———------- ------ —•-•-- ---- _____.._ ___ OCVONERS•CIVCONEERS•CVOLOCIll ... • • ,•:,w-i.i"7 • . • - . .....3, ,..... -0•21,•., .•.----------": :-1.,.. ''- . _----- i r5 — _l______ ItT.c." ----- --- -,:. 1:44:1-'— ...___ ,, r • _- • ...__ ... ---:..e..?,,,,•°,--',----='.---777 •.,' \ • \ , - ‘1, , .1,, .,. "...1 •‘. • 1 1 t I /..3 . „.. . • II ' ' 4. • ..,-..—VOILia U. tt' 4.40STWAC; ,V121.,•••0-.-4.-..•,. . . ____ .• ----/-AP •1021tA=1=0 . 0 1 I • . . 1 ror , 1 -- - I. 1 ! ot.o.tot / \ •‘. I i " .,,,.......... i i•.11 ,te•r,x i wrirzc !3 .• - - , 1 t4-zwzr. 1,-, 1 ni ; f 41 llovi 0 SorCUES ,.. ,! i ' f __— -- 1_ . i PA.il I Li/ 1 0 L • ........ 'Z I i W' J 1 _ l t - --- 1 / ,..- •__ ---. ._ 1- ___ __ - , • - . , ,, 1 \. r__--r- b001•r Poj,,,,. LEO&DESOUPD1 , \N\ ', 1 ., rj _____] 1.11 af Aloft 5,C.O.•Illoan'a Ertl Ington Garelon•Malt lot L ,. il- . 1,,,,., • .lb*City of Mettle.41•1•10r.tb. I.•ccordIng to th• flat vacorded In Orlon.17 of gl•ta.rag•74 In SIN Count, .101 or tan, •• ----L._ I' 1 1 I inCt.01, it 1 NCI 5 1. tt All of Alook 11.C.d.11111ftan,goal...ton pardons Addition , f 1 : -- , ro it.City of goat!),01+1•Ion No.1.according lb tfm P1 ___ Car .1 o mooed*In Voluma 17.gag.74 In 10,‘`. County,lOtaln hottan. •-..... •\, C°0".°u0.4 ol t'*!VC" I A' VI . ‘ .... $ 2 •//t LI • C7.7 C= = i ‘ \cb. . !A!S 1.11 0 * ISOM . . . 0 4 t .o 4 I.ClCvATC,io DATUM WWII°Ora CITY 01,10410.4 a ICC. • \ C C.:-= f-- C... C= \NN‘N 0 2 41 > rc 0 4 Cr y CIAT Iltd,werVI Kit I-4,RO•COOP?.0.1flii•I CCIOnCrOtriti 11•01WWAL!tlY147.10 FT New LOFT • . 2 0 P.C1.2•••*ITC OrtALLIUARIC•..../84110400The_In 00131fgrUCTIt , , ,-= L--_- z ,- •...... : 4.i 1 TiViT&LW IMPAIR PILL 00•Cltat,Catis. ' . .• 4•\ a .J j 4 ; 4,144 Or ALL Oa lat.•C612 0 110•10•CTE 0 tONS Me \ • i > f, 01- 'I 4 s _.]4' 1 II.Mr0.109 IMO ALL•Ne•A UPON CO•0,01014 Or 00•0010 i . CALL WO At RK op 0_COWIN,WIT.CW•Ott WINTON ...0•IsATIO...0.40.117454„,„.C11...C11,...•17.,%45._,1,11.1_0;c:Toti.A.1_4.6,1 - 141010.14.4C3111.4.10 Lt40.1.1.•YVA.60 ROCK OM BlIAILAPI 11,041(01 . • 5 5 • \ lli -- - 1•1.0•CIACIII 5 1.r!_170‘..""'LIC""1.4%“0,0tA'ff'11"frOdfCt'OrT.CO•70=1C715:0"11:C •ACI SW 19 th ST TO TNI•21711 00AU.sa a.Ream.°IN•0-L.4 MD CLEAN C-051CoTPer. TRACK --"N fr.-;4; •J'' :-tr.;71 . 1 1 `' ..- . t 1 L i ,.' .. -,, -• l' 1 0 ,' -rr IP • .,,, 1 1=2 . ..., ii, el .122t 1 I r D PIKNETT , ,,, RENTON ,-,r a , - i EL _.,,• -,,,,...• ..0 , -- avart arm /*//'' ,• -, ' i— -05---Ca T•• lla annot. IKCAn71 ' ••• 'f,..11-" • t411• • i —yy—MIN WWII 014fICIA -. g . .•*,...-It. .;3,- ' :, ,.. i I - _ 1 . , . ....w, 21..91___ 1,1 . .t. IIAICAAT I 110..1 ‘,,•\ 0...0.1 Moon, 1, • \ _ - \ • -• &ACTION ogili I _ . . ..15 50 . . o• "'.. rig ICCA.0/210._flgairktreer- 151&__1.73 "...•,....0.• ....• la Gitlin' PLAN _ __________ e::0-1THE AUSTIN .. b•b ---- VALLEY OFFICE 5 C1DUSTRIAL PAM COMPANY ..11, C 1 ....-.K.,..., .... ......—Earmt......wim. ... ... Malang• •atar6,6143 0...00•11 symysa..... .a..a. --, • . . . . cot iis com odor Irr Ain inc. c. •vLr ^ Ri - � i "+� I i QSQsi ( l4 . „, I, ,a _,„._-a rncmcvr November �._. _ -' C:. C 4 , 1981 '7 7 Mr. Roger Blaylock Associate Planner City of Renton Municipal Building '00 Mill Road South Renton , WA 98055 Dear Roger : .. Enclosed are two copies of the completed Application for Special Permit , two copies of the Affidavit of Ownership and two copies of the Environmental Checklist Fnrm. We have not encluded a site plan , since all of the building plans for the Benson Condominium are currently on file at the City of Renton , and no physical changes are planned. Our request for a conditional use permit , is under the provisions 1the City of Renton zoning ordinances (4- 7094) wherein premises ned for residential use may be used for professional offic (riaragraph A3 (a) ) . es The professional office will be occupied by Pacific Computer L r_sing , Inc . (PCL) of which I am the President , and sole shareholder. P L , as the name implies , arranges financing for medium and large IBM computer systems in the northwest. These financial services relquire (1 ) marketing , hich is my responsibility and which takes place outside of the and (2) administration which is done by the only other employee at the unit . Our offer to o rchas_ , the unit from its previous owner was made subject to The Benson Board of Direcnrs approving our occupancy as pro:c.ssional office , which era; i v",n_ prior ' ` `' g '. *� the sale . ( 1.a'tter attached) 'the unit appears to meet -the commercial code in terms of its fire separation barriers and loading requirements . The Fire Marshall forsees no problems with our utilization. Please call if you have any questions . Ve y tr lj yours , qjj _ - - , T.C. McCarthy President co : George Akers •, Montgomery , Purdue , Blankinship & Austin LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING • May 12, 1981 Mr. Terrance C. McCarthy c/o Mr. Dave Ballard The Benson Sales Office 1425 S. Puget Dr. , Unit #401 Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. McCarthy:. As a condition of your closing, you have requested permission from The Benson Condominium Board of Directors to establish an office within condominium Unit #204 in The Benson condominium project. Given the facts in your case, we therefore grant permission for you to establish an office within your unit as long as the following conditions are ob- served: 1 . No signage is to be displayed which is visible from the outside of the unit. 2. Any walk-in traffic which may be associated with the office is to be discouraged. Such traffic, if there is any, shall be restricted to no more than normal traffic from invited guests and acquaintances. 3. Noise levels associated with the proposed office shall not create a threat to the quiet enjoyment of the other residents in the project. 4. Any special electrical or other equipment needed shall not constitute an immediate or continual hazard to other residents and shall be inspected by management prior to operation and from time • to time as requested by the Board of Directors. 5. Such office shall be in compliance with local zoning ordinances. Please sign below and return the original to Ralph D. Brinton & Associates, Inc. , c/o Richard P. Dunn, 460 South Tenth East, Suite 300, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102. Signed: BENSON CONDOMINIUM BOARD OF DIRECTORS Date By: ire or (In behalf of enson oar of Directors) ACKNOWL GED: V . By: 109-411LANE: (1d 21• lLl� CIVIL ENGINEERS ® SURVEYORS ® PLANNERS _ December 7, 1981 DEI PROJECT NO. 80010 Lincoln Property Company S1 400 S. E. Sixth Street • ite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 Attention: Scott Springer Ref: Lakeside Apartment Project, Renton Dear Mr. Springer: At yourrequest we have researched the availability of utilities, (water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer) to the referenced site. A complete discussion of the alternatives available to provide the site with ade- quate fire flows is contained in the report. of 20 April 1981 by RN2 Engineering. In essence, the report states that the city' s system can be upgraded and extended to the site through one of several routes and by one of two different funding mechanisms. Sufficient water supply is therefore available to the site. Sanitary sewers are also available to the site by one of two alternatives. . An existing 8" line deadends at the northwest corner of the property on the east margin of Lake Washington Blvd. The depth of the line limits the potential service area to the south. Those portions which cannot be served by the existing 8" line can be served by a tap into the METRO trunk which ties on the west side of the Lake Washington Blvd. There are now several storm sewer culverts under Lake Washington Blvd. which drain the site and adjoining lands. Studies done for the park show these structures to be more than adequate to carry the anticipated developed flows. Whether these culverts will qualify as "adequate downstream courses" so as to eliminate the need for retention on the developed sites will depend to a certain extent on the development plans, but the possibility is certainly there. In conclusion, there would seem to be no insurmountable problem with providing utilities to this site. Some extension and upgrading of existing facilities will be necessary, but this is neither unusual , nor are the improvements required so extensive that they could not be funded and installed by the developer. Very/truly yours, Bruce J. Dodd- P.E BJD/j k 1850-130TH AVE.N.E., BELLE VUE,WA 98OO5 • [206)BB5-7877 OR 454-3743 • • `.` F.ti Amin f • April 20, 1981 S1061 .0 • RECEIVED • HNR 23 1981 LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. 515 116th Avenue N.E. , Suite 158 DODDS EN,GINEERC PIC Bellevue, WA 98004 �,v f(� JOB NO. , Attention: Mr. Scott Springer, J.D. • Subject:. Water system improvement alternatives for the proposed Lakeside development • Dear Mr. Springer: • This letter summarizes water system improvement alternatives for providing various levels of water supply capability for fighting a fire (fire flow) at the proposed Lakeside development in the City of Renton. Fire flow llevels of 2700, 3500 and 4200 gallons per minute (gpm) while maintaining 20 pounds per square inch pressure residual , in accordance with Insurance Services Office Criteria, have been considered at the highest development elevation of 100 feet. Tne attached map illustrates four alternatives for obtaining the fire flow levels mentioned. Alternative 1 and 2 each contain approximately 1 ,900 lineal feet of pip.e and will require a pressure reducing station. These two alternatives can provide fire flows of 3500 or 4200 gpm by providing 12 or 16 inch diameter pipe. Alternative 3, a substantially longer length at 3700 feet , consists of two sections of pipeline improvements and can provide a maximum of 3500 gpm. Alternative 4, which can provide 2700 gpm, consists of modifying the pipeline improvements plannned by the City Park Dept. for Gene Conlon Park. The alignment would be adjusted up to Lake Washington Boulevard instead of through the park and the diameter increased to 12 inches from 8 inches . This alternative, although more expensive than Alternatives 1 and 2 , could obtain participation by other property owners alnd the City and we anticipate that the participation would make this the least expensive alternative. The estimated cost for each alternative is summarized in the following table: 300 - 120th Avenue N E. Suite 219. B�lievue. Wa. 93005 (206) 451-0565 • .• • Lincoln Property Co ny N.C. , Inc. April 20, 1981 Page 2 • Current Alternative Estimated Cost 1 or 2 3500 gpm 1900 lineal feet of 12" diameter pipe and a pressure reducing station $80,600 1A or 2A 4200 gpm Same as 1 and 2 except 16" diameter pipe $95,800 3 3500 gpm 3720 lineal feet of 12" diameter pipe and a pressure reducing station $132,400 4 2700 gpm Realignment and size increase to 12" (Cost dependent pipe for 4250 lineal feet and one upon partici- crossing pation) Our recommendation is Alternative 2 or 2A depending on the actual fire flow required. If the fire flow requirement can be reduced to 2700 gpm, then • alternative 4 should be considered in more detail prior to making a deci- sion. (Degree of others ' participation should be established). Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you desire additional information. Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance in your planning efforts. Sincerely, i/;/) 1"d'44---/'?"((,/---- • Richard H. Harbert, P.E. HH:jw cc Bruce Dodds, Dodds Engineers RECEIVED APR 23 1981 DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. • JOB NO._ 1 \ r ' '`I`1i' 1.[I I L11=L1=( 1,1 1 1.1-I_L_1_L [ I \ 55 + ail�hl;l':I.(PHI_I 1 LLI_ .l_L LL I i [ l_LLL LLL1.I I Irk ^° 41 42.. V L, �._ _. ICI'I I'f'_1i� I I=L1.I rI II i IJ ►.r[. 1 r( I. [ Iir�l _ «i'►1[1 TiJa +'' ---___` ''1'''1"1i11'.3 r1 I._LLI 1.1_LU I`I i 1_I 1 II_I 1 I I.L1.l 43 44 A5 �11' i 50100E r I I ,,I 5) r sz I r� ), 213 ' _ I L �.� \, m 3 j e 5\Tri \ 1 27d � . 1__1 IIL° 12 277 _ \ 5 !w %�o-%� (1.- n y 276 r — .l — f _ �I_1I f • '\\\,, \, •\•\ '',,‘'.•" N.,/4N,/'el;_____viii 8-7_,,,,..._. -,„--_,_-,- `\ ` / 28 T s \ \\\ \ \� ", ao_ g i i 4 II i I 4 sj,3 xx �� I 3 x rj \\I \ \\\ .‘f ,a` -i 137 33 ' 1, ` d 2tJ 2l9 ___ • \ c \ , fi' '=x . r \` 0 •.:\ II — s. . •% ,` \ \ \, a �' + •7 i • ,:d . /,f /a , \ 4„ , t d ., A. �•b; llE'.i.. '`1 • I �t, \ +" Y1 " vF I i 1' N.'L-- --)-- \ .\'5i*Mtik4.;',40.t49' 1 11 • ", 'ill 11 I I 1�ry t aaa , - 11 ; �, • ` ` � / :ens II I z9e za5 1//,L ) ' -- \ i Y 1 i/ ''‘‘I ( :,‘t i\'\''r '..\\\ ....'- ' c\ i ::::i1,\k \v'. 3.1:LA 31b \Ill .r"— / '..." ' i:—.7. : '..' :-.'1, i --\. Z51 z 6 G --7--I-11 ''''-:31'.i\ ,g':11 i '''''., \1 :::::., \\'\-)\ \ Ns ---- ' !. LI 't--) CI ?I/ )) ". \ li \ I) I ll `' D53 --- — \ \\ \ 11 :: -"-'-1.....L ::-..---._;', I I or fr4 ..,4 //)) I, •' 1 '1 1 1 , . ,,,1 \"\. .) ...1: 0 ''', 2 1 290. - 4: '': '.4 4 "'... ‘:. .::7.'",. .! 1,.( i \ \1.: " \ ���� 1, J i 0 L 1 rr, 0 e 1 r :i: r1� I... 4,..,,,,c,"„ I I \ / \ I \ d tir I1 :1, I I Richard Carothers Associates Decem.er 4, 1981 REZON, APPLICATION COVER LETTER APPLI ANT: Anna Phinney, Bruce Larson et. all , Estate of M.W. Lotto and Marjorie L. Lotto The 0 ners of the property described in the accompanying documents hereby apply for a rez ne of the property to an R-3 classification. The property is located east of Lake tashington Boulevard, across the street from the Gene Coulon Park extension presently under construction. The site is currently in operation as a golf driving range on a lease basis. In the comprehensive plan the property is designated as R-4 for high density multi-family use. This classification would allow in excess of fifty units per acre oh the site which contains approximately ten acres, thus permitting in the vicinity of 500 dwelling units at maximum site development. The owners are, howeve , applying for R-3 zoning with a stipulation that not more than 186 units will b constructed on the site. This R- 3 application is being sought, in part, to expedi e the environmental review and rezone process. Previous discussions with the Ci y of Renton Planning Department have indicated that an R-3 rezone would likely fall below the threshold otherwise necessitating th preparation of an enviro mental impact statement occasioned by project size. The rezone to R-3 and subsequent development of multi-family housing on the pro- perty is appropriate. It is consistent with both the plans and policies of. the City o Renton formulated in the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan foresees this pro- , perty nd adjacent sites along Lake Washington as developing into an affordable multi- amily-residential community. Such development is particularly important due to its close proximity to the central city core. Renton is experiencing overall rapid rowth, much of which is in the outlying areas. Providing housing in or near the city core is recognized as an important priority for the near future, in Renton as wel as many other cities. Interstate 405 provides the major traffic linkage of Renton to other parts of the greate Seattle area. As designed currently and for the foreseeable future, access to the Interstate is substantially easier from the project area than it is for many areas =ast of I-405. The rapid growth of residential areas in eastern Renton has ,create. near saturation of major arterial feeders to the Interstate. Current and projected lgvels of traffic support the desirability of shifting additional growth to the west". The su•ject property is particularly well suited for development as a residential project of the type proposed. It is situated on a terrace, well above Lake Wash- ington, providing excellent views to the west while reducing its physical and visual impact on the lake and shoreline. The major portion of the site is nestled below teep slopes screening the development from Interstate 405. These slopes provide excellent buffering between the proposed development and neighboring uses Eight Fourteen East Pike Street, Seattle, Washington 98122 Telephone (206) 324-5500 Offices Seattl .Washington I E3r,r,r• Idaho r{t;ytor: Viruinla ;'orllhnr! r;.i,,,. • Rezone Application December 4, 1981 Page 2 to the northeast and southeast. These slopes would, additionally, continue to act as a defacto addition to the greenbelt prevelant in the area. The site has easy access to nearby recreational facilities and the newly developing Gene Coulon Park and the Lake Washington waterfront areas. This amenity is partic- ularly valuable to residents of multi-family developments who generally have limited access to outdoor spaces of their own. The proposed rezone and subsequent development is timely. The City of Renton is undergoing steady and continued growth as the focal point of the south Lake Wash- ington area. Rental vacancies are relatively low, particularly when compared with the neighboring areas of Kent, Auburn and Federal Way. • As previously discussed, traffic patterns would suggest a preference toward concentrating near term growth in areas of continued good access to downtown Renton and I-405. With the ever increasing need for sensitivity in the area of energy conservation, particularly regarding gasoline use, encouraging housing that is close to major employment and retail areas is a worthwhile priority. The proposed project suits this end particularly well . Although in some cases access to utilities is difficult, there is no question that all the necessary utilities are available to serve the subject property, and that sufficient reserve capacity exists in order to accommodate a project of the size proposed. Copies of a traffic study and soils report are attached to this application.. . Neither the traffic study or the soils report indicate any significant develop- mental problems with respect to the project itself or with respect to its impact upon Lake Washington Boulevard and the surrounding community. , 1 Roger Blalock, Department of Planning, City of Renton, Meeting of April 29, 1981 . 2 Roger Blalock, Department of Planning, City of Renton, Telephone communication of May 14, 1981 . 3 Don Monihan, Department of Public Works, City of Renton, Telephone communication of May 14, 1981 . Richard Carothers Associates A _c--•-• -r, , ,, ,' s 1", 1 6 I. ,, t.''' 0 ''.'ti '.44.2if,,..:lit ' ' ' . 1 IL...... , .. . ,•••••'--' •-• •I''..a.1 A�a• , I 1*.gyp/ d • • {r,• C _ 4 ` i i s i e . �, 5,��..ai/1'.. . _ g. .1.�'' ' // ,`t01111 I ' r' i 7; ':Zts �•:••. •!•� . Y ' s : Ord " • 1 '• '• t � • / ' � ' t f• , I • C• •r'It b 7 : -b t: L :-•' } k / / / . ' i / , A I". t•C�\ 1 ,.`, .p .R'-" , •so �s•i el` ` � t • • '0' . i / , / /1 ei e . .• lif: .. • p NO , ,..,. .., ..,.ie..&;,..]&--__i-- % .,‘ t • . ..."...„---- ; _413A • / , ' . .. 4 71' ''. _ ..- . 2 - 0.- 000..,.....::::-.- N. it =';'..---.— i J. pp • !• F 9• v•.'�f'a �� T�•-4g�Q�� YL2IIDI rEI1�il o--- - it _ y ! 1 •, • r•' • 00\. t _ _ _ q` f O /i T H — Itsa�e— Y I. 4 ,,� x 0441 1� ji 1 \ • E k�\l't . -- ;• Oill ' iii,t4454,1•41.4 • *. ".- ..."..----...-- -......"........----.. ..1q3N Eit '''‘k. 7 CO i ' / ,e. N. • - / ‘...0, '. I ; rtin 44 z. E 8 1 r' �A\\ •fit( �:� A ®"T:r V ,` 1�/ •:.1. w I �_ A , I tin, •.�,• I J • A �a • • r • • ' y7-7... .s r.•• •f-l7• )7 7 7••• 77 • 7 7 Jr 777 ` .—� 1�p ^ �{ 6 i ••• \• / C. r .7 1-��7'I7 4 , J ...r... 1 ® �(• ,� I r d••••• J • o I �/p I r,f..♦ - Act! ! • Jill P.Tp4119/trg, 9N Hy A or 7 'S" 1. C I r1 �.) r 1 ' �ye•O1•w • — ,W - '-; "Wrat 7%4. 45 z._. `� PRIM. - �•n•.ie.l--- L. r 1~' (FLY SE.0 ST• E HWY u0 -A�„x 0 1 RENTO •TO KENNYDALE e .. f 4 ,,., APPROVEd A►RIL I!.1066 ............._..�..... v,• {H IG H AVa. . . N•� D J sl I SMrt t8 04 6 �, •.ev✓.a. e.77 w •• :Yd./yi..wy/g••1...�[•ti:ii3•M�"�ro"T •.•..#+nv.■ • /804 •F--�_I }c i is ,<J..��,7,,,r M H M �.• l-'�• o•a0 tic. r ✓ ••[�/1 ( ' ril."—Vragtro •BLi• `''.'� • � iI �, \It V9; rr� I 1p I , 1\1 ,.. OI G ta .. 1 � k', }IN �'�, ` t1,° ^.'�. t a. 334450 JR ,-... , ,e:,..0--) / --, .:, i . 1 r 1 N A - `,!�'4'y w N 4 p1. 41 ____J• �• '1 L. v • • • OF Rp A. U °j �°° .. ° THE CITY OF RENTON : Z, • ' ' °' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT m 235-2552 "I- . 0 "' " ^' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 9,0 �. P. December 11, 1981 0•94 et) SEPS ' BARBA-A Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Mr. Ron McConnell, Acting Manager Building and Land Development Division 450 K'ng County Administration Building Seatt e, Washington 98104 RE: C. NDLEWOOD RIDGE - A PUD 4 6 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS Dear . McConnell: The Ci y of Renton has just received the "SEPA Register" and noted that a proposed declar tion of NON-significance has been issued for the above project. Having not received any other referral by King County, we are very concerned about the implica- tions of this decision. Due to the short notice, the City's Environmental Review Committee has not had the opport .nity to consider this proposal. However, in light of past actions in this vicini•y (Carriagewood and Shadowood) , this department must strongly recommend an , enviro mental impact statement to consider the following Potentially adverse effects : 1. Traffic and associated impacts (noice and air quality) 2. Public services, particularly police and fire 3. Project scale 4. Impacts upon the site 5. Storm drainage 6. Utilities, particularly sewers and water 7. Recreation We beligve that the items above have "more than a moderate" effect upon, the environ- ment, apd thus the project requires evaluation and full public disclosure through an EIS. This matter is set for Environmental Review Committee review on December 16, at which time a formal City position will be formulated. Very`, ly you Aigye , ._. , . troi,:i7.;. '.� tom it „;r . David R. Clemens Policy Development Director DRC:wr cc: Mayor Cou cil . Environmental Review Committee Naela Page 2 - Week of Nov. 30-Dec. 4, 1981 Da nvi ron meat a 1 A-956 /� •v, �, CH B Lead Agency Proposal • Date Red ew:i? sr ®�1iy r c a, E 14' Issued Reviews /y� 1��i PROPOSEDDECLARATIONS ✓//� + O F N O HS I C N I F I C A N C E(2) 6 �i) Ce W 1 Whatcom County 146-unit residential condominium, 12/1/61 12,17,Cr?.Y� •••.•.M+...+.+-..csk**er.a.,r directly east and south of intersection Published weekly in accordance with WAC 197-10-831. Listings fe: public a:i:n of Tyee Dr. and APA Rd. (Point Roberta � � in this Register should be sent to the Department of I.colecy, i•_c.vir.s,n• -ta? Yacht Basin Realty, Inc.) Review Section, Mail Stop Pt'-11, Olympia, WA 9850.. Phom,. (206) 4.Y.1_t,�._., I Wh;tcom County Expansion of a nonconforming use by 12/1/61 12'1M+B: •••••••w. ••.......e•.•• addition of 24x56 ft. to an existing building used for commercial purposes in an Agricultural zoned area (valley Doc+•-sents Received During Week of Nov. 30-ne:. 4, 1981 Plumbing 6 Electric) sa.,, ,. , ,u i, 3 Port of Skagit c Co.A-95• La Conner Mari,.0 Master Plan 11/23'21 5 King Count., Two 60x100-ft. earchouse buildings and 11/2c!81 CA f - Leis Agent,- Pr000sal Iss�_ R_e.•i,.. fair underground fuel storage tanks, DRAFT E I Ss .. . 11525..E. Margina).Way S. (Harbor Island . Investments) •--�. 5 L:.g County Dry Boat Storage Facility, 7 one-st•�v l.'./81 lt9ia2 5 fing County Candlevood Ridge. a p1..'ned unit`' 11/25!8• 1: Si"'buildings with a capacity ice 382 beats, development for 406 multiple-family an office, caretaker's accommodations, •``_ dwellings, north of SF. Petrovitaky Rd. boat lifts and parking, Kenmore Cor_unity, .___ .and between 148th Ave. SE and 1521 re. east of 68th Ave. NE and south of NESE'-Tif•both_estcndod1.40F Chu-Ais ates 175th St. at 7007 NE 175th S_. (Plywood Number Three) • Supply Inc.), 5 King County Kingsgrovc. a subdivision of 37.07 11/25/81 12•'161!1 S City of Bellevue Evergreen Highlands Subared Plan, 12/1/81 1!5/82 acres into 121 lots, west of Kit Cor- adoption of a land use and annexation nor Rd. S. between S. 376th St. end S. plan for t''.e Evergreen Highlands Sub- 380th St. (if both extended (Daoa Corp.) P• area 5 King County Panther Lake North, aplanned unit as• Il/25/el )♦2/16 9 D.S. Army Corps Wynoochee Hydropower/Fish Hatchery, 12/3/81 1/31/8: development for 77 covnhoueea and of Engineers 10.2-megawatt hydropower addition to apartments, north of SE 200th St. on NW Wynoochee Dam and a 396,000-pound -aide of Panther Lake, 650 ft. east of hatchery for anadremnus fish, 35 mi. 108th Ave. SE (SR 515) (Charles • north of Montesano in Grays Harbor Henderson Co., Inc.) • County 5 King County Terra Glen, a subdivision of 14.63 • 11/25/81 12/16/81 22 Perm Oreille County Sullivan Creek li,droelectrfc Project, 12/1/81 1/4/82 acres into 58 lots, west side of 124th P.C.D. No. 1 and construct a new dam near the con- Ave. SE, between SE 203d and 205th Ste. VA State Dept. of nuance of Sullivan and Outlet Creeks (if both extended) (Benitz Zinc and Ecology for generation of 18 og, near Town of Mildred Carmichael) Hetaline Falls 5 King County Construct a 38.5-ft. high dish antenna 12/3/81 12/2311: F I N A L E T Ss eat an equipment building, 1550 ft. -- neat of Isaequah Hobart Rd. SE, wat of the BPA ea000cnt and south of SE 111th • • 5 City r Paulsbo Liberty Bay Marina, installation of • 17/81 St. (Wan tarn Tele-Communications. Inc.)marine complex to include both land- _ / based and floating structures and 5 King County Earth Station Antenna Syoupp 37.5-ft. 12/3/91 12/23M activities, 250 ft. NW of junction of high microwave antenna, euppo[t 33 Ave. with 6th St. (Earl L. Miller) structure and interconnect' g cabling occupying 400 sq. ft., 1000 ft. cast of 10 Thurston County Replat of Capitol City Eacates to 11/25/81 91st Ave. SW, 500 ft. north of SW 159th create 7 lots. 5 for single-family St. (Fisher Broadcasting, Inc.)attached townhouse-style units and 2 for commercial lots, scuth of Yelm Hwy. . • an: east of Rainier Rd. (Lyle Anderson/ - Aeaoclaten) (2) Only proposed declarations of noneignificance for proposals where the Department 24 City of Spokane North Riverbank Urban Design Plan, 12.216 1 of Ecology in an agency vith jurisdiction are required to be transmitted to the guidelines for public and private Department of Ecology. Environmental anseeamento (EAs) received from a Federal action and incentives for development agency are also lioted. (1) These dates are supplied by the lead agency. Requests for information or submittal of comments should be directed to the lead agency. 1 The SEPA Guidelines provide for a 35-day review of draft F.ISs and it 15-day review of proposed declarations of nonstgntficance. Thin time period say bo extended by the lead agency. • These numbers refer to the number of the A-95 Clearinghouse within whose jurisdiction the project lies. 'SI:?'���' *•I INN roTHpN • • • • r N N • • 41110• • 4r) , N------ COACANY Q SEATTLE T Q HOLMEs Q LureER • LONEACRES ID (7 DAVE l+9WEpE8 -_ ---- - -------_ 1N�RK9TRIAL ELECTRIC Z pyTOMOTIV! / \ W • SW.IE:157IT : . to\�\ I• Plat coo In Dolma fl of plats,Pogo Tt In Sing County, knob! mwncclou !IV \\\\ • __ 1 -- .fr �l�o•!Koet i,C.O.K11Mn'•a•rlinvtan C.rd•n•Amltlon \\ GROUP HEALTH 1 ' [y of Seattle,Division Sa.1,ounty,lnq to Ne Pl.t \\\d CO-OPERATIVE ; I 1'.cordtl io Poles.iTr PAP•].1p Knq CDuntY,W.•hlnvton. IS• O = o \dOh Q f;R 0 O O O \`\Af, 0 iii • O /.ELEVATION DATUM u/mWCITY OFRCNTDN•R.C. • 0 O 0 . -- o IMCARD I,WNTWRUM01V.tl.El(BTnLO T. NEW LOP,. O p o • AnlweRrlu O W LCLEAR SITE OPALL TREES•SRUSH AND OTHER OBSTRULTONS 3 0 0 `�\ Z I J THAT NAY IMPAIR FlLLOPCRATION9_ \\ E J �J ILPILL SHALL•E PLACED•COMPACTED TO ELEVATION!SHOWN. \\ I O.HYDROSEED ALL AREAS UPON COMPLETIONOFORADING- \ G.ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY°TRENTON \ \ N GRACING OROINWCC.CHA►iER 23_FILL MATERIAL SHALL NAVE NO MORE THAN YINOR AMOUNT!or ORGANIC • SUf6TWCE!AND!PULL HAVE NO ROCK OR SIMILAR IRREDUCIBLE LONOACRES • ! ___ \\\\ W MATl14AL WITIAMA%IMUN piMlNlION NEATER THAN 0INCNEl. RACE I� O. T.ALLPUDUCItOAOWAYSA IN ACENTTOANDPROVIDINOACCE!! SW.IS th.ST. TOTHIS SITE•NALL SE MAINTAINED IN A CLEAN AND CLEW 4i7 TRACK __ \ � y�t j CONDITION. ® �,\ Q�l , CITY 'CI DEL BENNETT RENTON Q ." 1a �• RkIPRTY COMER • 7•::. �� \ �./ �..L'..�. R .I_ �'O!)--DaTLOJSIADC rItlIDR T\1 WANT) w e..�:'3A<ti;' '`"J'+,. —n—rRnl OWE mlpaR A t''' ' 1 1 ry < Via„: �',.. .. a 'M; ;t:.a,,, • f r� • SW.zIn s7 `\\� I • L E MT. !TAW .,„. .. Ira l- CWIli Pr - I a THE AUSTIN AaO0 R.. _VICINITY_PLAN _- ..P v79 Wise sotIICI 1 . �.-VALLEY_OFFICE_a INDUSTRIAL.PArae____Sl o C.-1COMPANY am• OWNER!•oteKmn•MALC M - 1 4.sN 1,1"VIKELT--- =row — '- .0' 210.0 (ID) RIGHTI.O (4K.0.1101110f1 H( L. 3 1 \ . I c (0. p J L" O t. 1 'Woil I 1 • r 1 r ' C I di . \ \ .\\CI' . \\_.........) ' Z 1 \>1._ c § tE 0 a_ I b 1 C I N 0 I S f a • j I I _` I I //(II Y P C-11_-rI�/ 0 I I 1 ��_Im ) ‘:-.--- -tie�omo m - . . .ii .. .......... ..- ----- ) \ ` Qom u, � � � \-7 o ��/ 5N. 21�T�3rKEET CLOCK, 5 \'l'e DEP MAGIC ro 1 .._- Wm': 6. 4 LURE yr iRw.. I'IT' SiR.�_T 0044SFD ON 1..I.R 3,4. "v `""O p3Z6i'N 190uE EA Frt ivoNr D"4.A R^G' Q THE AUSTIN .....r•so' T... SITE PLAN 8 FILL SECTIONS .....° 79 5/9 Rw61 ...o VALLEY OFFICE a INDUSTRIAL PARK ..... G2 COMPANY .m DESIGNERS•ENGINEERS•SUILDERs °"n 1OC'*�"RENTON, WASH. ... IN „�---� TY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFI10E USE ONLY ' Application No. SP- DR7- St Environmental Checklist No. E('itr- io y-&1 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: EjDeclaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government,decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should ,include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no” and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent The Austin Company 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 800 S.W. 16th Street • Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 226-8800 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist. City of Renton , Planning fPp rtw nt 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Grading and Fill Permit 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Fill and grading on a 4.3 arid-a 5.. 6-.acre site to-'mke :thP sites acceptable for future development in accordance with zoning restrictions. -2- • 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : On the west side of the East Valley Road and South of Southwest 1 9th St-rPPt_ Rath the Fast Val 1 Py Rnad and COu1-h a ct l Ath • Street will be improved by LID 314 . Areas to West and South of the site are unimproved. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : June 1982 • 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : a. Special Permit for Filling and Grading. h. This site is r nrrPnfly 7nnPrl (1 npnpral Application will be made to rezone the site to H-1, Heavy Industrial 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: LID 314 include right-a-way acquisition of the Northwest corner of the subject site. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- • posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic X substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? - X YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X features? ES MAYBE NO (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES Mi B NO Explanation: (b) and (r•), C'rarli ng anrl f�i l l-iacj—df the site—will—'zotult in overlayment of existing soil and change in tnpngraphy -�r"--- I -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: a -(3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of X water movements , in-either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or X the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (b) Water currently backs up onto this Si fiP rl„P +-r inadequate drainage along Southwest 19th Street. • 'This fai1T• be remedied by LID' 314.' (c) Same as (b) .' (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs, grass , crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X YES MATTE" NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) Existing grasses will be Overcovered with fill. _ -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (cJ) At the present time a portion of the site is _ swampy due to inadequate drainage along 19th Street. There may be some small mammals inhabiting the site that will be displaced by the filling operation. (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBE NO _ Explanation: (8) land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population X of an area? YES MAYBE KU— Explanation: �,•-- . -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , X create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:' (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , X bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (`14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE - NO (b) Police protection? - X YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO (e) _ Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: _(15)_ Energy. Will the proposal result in: _(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of ,energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO 1 (c) Water? - YES MAYBE NO , -b- w,"_' . , 6. (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO r. (e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE N0 (f) Solid waste and disposal? X • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAtBE NO _ _ Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO "__ _ " ...__" __Explanation: ___ , _ (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site., structure, object or building? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE • I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that -the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or wiil,f.u+'l of full disclosure on my part. "175 Proponent: /// 4�%cfl, p igned) Paul S. Chiado (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 e -`' • '-' , -\: f-R-;-W AFFIDAVIT t `i_r,I_1'1LU NOV 30 1981 I, P ul S. Chiado, an Officer of Valley A no • '_""'"""'" / Offie and Industrial Park, Inc. , " .- ,e formerly Metro Industrial District , being duly;,0wor ,j�declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application -and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this O day of , 19 e( , Notar Public in and for the State of Washilgton, residing at Seattle i___, • i\---/9 (Name of Nota Public) (Sign0;1:11,1 e Owner) Donna J. Trulson Paul S. Chiado 8.00 S uthwest 16th Street. Renton , WA VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK (Addre s) . (Address) 800 Southwest 16th Street Renton, Washington , (City) (State) 226-8800 (Telephone) (FOR OFF CE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is o certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular- and to conform 4o the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application. Date Rec ived , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 1 . . , - , I Receipt # ,.:-:. ,r-,,, ',/-._,,,,. ,'----,! -CITY OF RENTON I PLANNING DEPARTMENT - 1 ._,,, ,,, , NAME !.'';1-.:'' .:';'it.f'' - 7' i•' '. ,:'. 7, DATE 1. PROJEC\T & LOCATION ---:/k-f', .-;. ,` i . - ,.-.--; , r .! 7,.. r Ir If Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total , , A • , ,, ., . _,4 •;:,.; - . .; .....-.:-_, \. . ' \I , Environmental Checklist li '"-:' \ Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee .., \ TOTAL FEES e) ( ...,) Please tke this receipt and your payment :to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank voU. ENDiNG. . OF FILE . . . FILE TITLE M , .. • • „ A ..... 14 / / (.0004922/k).