Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 01PARTIES OF RECORD
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIM PLAT
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner
13607 461st Avenue SE
North Bend, WA 98045
(owner)
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Bill Finkbeiner
Finkbeiner Development
12011 Bel -Red Road ste: #206
Bellevue, WA 98005
tel: (425) 454-7777
eml:
billf@finkbeinerdevelopment.com
(applicant / contact)
9V
Raymond Woo
14404 SE 87th Street
Newcastle, WA 98059
(party of record)
Pastor David Shenk
Dinah Prather
Robert Johnseine
Awesome Yah Church, Church of
709 Rosario Place NE
9805 NE 116th Street ste:
Yah in Christ
Renton, WA 98059
#7499
702 Nile Avenue NE
(party of record)
Kirkland, WA 98034
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(party of record)
Ken Bouvier
Jarrod Faehnrich
Kerry & Shana Curran
721 Rosario Place NE
751 Orcas Avenue NE
715 Rosario Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 761-6853
tel: (425) 241-0703
tel: (425) 466-8395
(party of record)
eml: jarrodf@freethought.org
(party of record)
(party of record)
Jon Newman
Karen Walter
Mina Fletcher
8070 Langston Road 5
Watersheds and Land Use Team
667 Rosario Place NE
Seattle, WA 98178
Leader
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
eml: vin_mina875@msn.com
Fisheries Division
(party of record)
39015 172nd Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092
(party of record)
Dion Coleman
Michael Krohn
Kevin Van Flandern
5821 NE 8th Street
457 Pasco Place NE
600 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
tel: (425) 890-6918
(party of record)
eml: mkrohnl29@gmaii.com or
vicepresident@windwoodhoa.com
(party of record)
John Nelson
Merrick McGinnis
Peggy & George Bukota
12865 47th Place
5915 NE 4th Place
577 Rosario Avenue NE
Bellevue, WA 98006
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059-4553
(party of record)
eml:
(party of record)
treasurer@windwoodhoa.com
(party of record)
Updated: 04/11/11 (Page 1 of 3)
PARTIES OF RECORD
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIM PLAT
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Martin Paquette, PLS
Carlos Lopez
Brian Baggett
Renton Technical College
523 Pasco Place NE
511 Pasco Place NE
3000 NE 4th Street
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98056
(party of record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Russ Gawler
George A. Sabo!
Vyacheslav Rebrik
517 Pasco Place NE
528 Pasco Place NE
567 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Judy Zaccaria
Elvina Tong
Allison Feely
579 Pasco Place NE
603 Pasco Place NE
615 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Kim Racine
Mythu Chiem
Turen Pang
653 Pasco Place NE
665 Pasco Place NE
5914 NE 7th Street
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Richard Crews
Valerie Harris
Brandon Lee
5920 NE 7th Street
658 Pasco Place NE
618 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Ruth Jang
Mary Ann Ferreira
Wayne Messere
574 Pasco Place NE
556 Pasco Place NE
522 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Baiju Nair
Ricky Canlez
Jill Wirick
516 Pasco Place NE
510 Pasco Place NE
5921 NE 4th Place
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Lisa Miner
Mary D'Ettore
Melissa Bouthillier
6007 NE 4th Place
6013 NE 4th Place
463 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Khanh Nguyen
Michael Le
Kate Bressan
500 Quincy Avenue NE
518 Quincy Avenue NE
564 Quincy Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Updated: 04/11/11 (Page 2 of 3)
PARTIES OF RECORD
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIM PLAT
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Carl & Mary Beth Josef Linda Gallup Daren Kobata
608 Quincy Avenue NE 614 Quincy Avenue NE 625 Quincy Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059
(party of record) (party of record) (party of record)
Marilyn Dimalanta
601 Quincy Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Khanh Soliven
619 Quincy Avneue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Tony Roebuck
572 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Carolyn Kine
513 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Dale Miller
462 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Jennifer Mazurkiewicz
572 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Loc Huynh
630 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Jay Coleman
655 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Joe Mendoza
568 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
James Hoo
605 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Ann V. Nguyen
566 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Beng Cabrera
508 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Grace Wu
450 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Phong La
5715 NE 6th Street
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Todd Taylor
637 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Xiaofei Shi
661 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Louise Chan
671 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Cheryl Takano
617 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Robert Hansen
526 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Hyung J. Paik
480 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Dora Kwong
5819 NE 6th Street
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Shelley Carlin
612 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Tom Beardslee
647 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Updated: 04/11/11 (Page 3 of 3)
2
rn
�Fi
C)
P
9
�1
}
o
ell
°v
1
Ti
n
14
r�
�
o
of
ri
4
a
�
o
4
n
2
rn
�Fi
C)
P
9
Narnc
N W
I 'n
�a
Y
q
I
ai
Q
i
ON
6
cu
0
U)
B 8
I k
00
cu
0
U)
CITY OF
RENTON
annn�gls+.u,r:yJawlk xo.a o.Ml.
OLYMPl15
REN
VILLA PLAT {1UA10-X%1i�
TON, WASHINGTON
Iz/as/xolo
d�--
anw
-- --- --- -- ""--
no. •ens+cM ery wxE :wrx �-
o
o �
B i
x
ITs � � ve � K xen olAtt
€
. I.
v
nll.E AYEnVE HE
..
I
8
�
a�
I
FN 1xA '11+50 !�
Slaw
I
I I
I
Lo
:
N
_ -
0
2
I
i f
I
/
Ij!
I
I I 1
'
ti
5
D
1 1�
i
—s1
c
8
'
�
>3
m
f
�
a
t
$ � t
u�
eMMl.o•..5xa.la+lex
$ �
g���+i�4g
n�
OLYMPUS VILLA
OFFE ENGINEERS
m
BILL FINKBEINER
+rl��i�'
---
STREET PROFILES
ceeuxeoer
mo
dutxM Sr
a�Eoao erc
o�
oAn
_..... ._... .....ww._....... r._...__._._...w�...................... ._.....�...v..
t
OLYMPUS VLLA
g4a,
T� 1 OOUM �
Awl
IL
C"
- f 1
� /ill � •• r
a awmer
%do I a - W
r nw
KW
M iM
ItY1M �w
- •
I -m -or
a awmer
r nw
KW
M iM
ItY1M �w
■ 0 -In■
V'■
wwwi
MR~ 7
d�
i
Mead Gitman & Assoc,
Professional band Surveyors
P.O. BOX M, WQOCMfVLLE m 9W -n
"am (4w M" -I= FOX (40) 48"Im
t
AIN J0
Am j a A A a X.rr an qo\r n 4% m
Ma�airr�r .YWM v
I r r f
=MAN
LAJL
. wl
MMr a wol 4 w .
.uM 'lwilre NM ro _
Miwf �M7F�l I¢. M
awl �7�
am C
MM h/t/7 MAL M r✓')
.aomA A nsmliD bsaM
nog( ,nu? bnsJ lami283lo-R
10f& -W (a&&) YIA1 mt-au (!M) apo"
s
n
I�
i
w rr
pMw IMI Lam. �� =M
.r..
blL
I�
l
�j
■
�
^1
I ■
. wl
MMr a wol 4 w .
.uM 'lwilre NM ro _
Miwf �M7F�l I¢. M
awl �7�
am C
MM h/t/7 MAL M r✓')
.aomA A nsmliD bsaM
nog( ,nu? bnsJ lami283lo-R
10f& -W (a&&) YIA1 mt-au (!M) apo"
s
J �
w rr
pMw IMI Lam. �� =M
.r..
d
m
g
n
4
ti
wtamm OLYMPUS
WI^WI^IM 11. T. 93 N., R.iF.,■x
CRY of FANroM, i COLNr r, w ommom
...rwaswMa.�rss=��
16 OF
L ame=ae r&WW-OW..W,A.R,..��,._..
a =r jr r r a" r w w "L w�a r ism rr
R
E m -ml me "m
w m Mari Sr.
�Qft u
M 'N �wm%mm
���
�#m Ni.
===� Kt11 v.
Afty�w rww avatar.
1MS �R . WERaM
�ww+wi as WE%Um
F. ,�
Ar
ff�l r .._.
aar r � ara MM �w w M. Miwe awRw w wa � ,v �Mrr►
.�
� r iuM r awa w� at oiMaa ww
wpm"� � rrrNNW IF,
3-%v-rftAzmL..
OWN
W. ZARWOMMU-71.0-00-
c' � W 7 wwm maLqlL
t
VAS
, .
e am INDYM V YM
wawa lass! �#�. ■i �ralaa # t1a ff i �! r aww �w11 � �a .1
• M!r � # 7� >K 1141 wt �1 ! Q71� �'
-rld�llill a��Yl1 M! �I! #1�A11r M14#
3w 0
Yw .rRl�le sY� SII J�1111� aq i1� 771�1I. a7 lelrrlR/7�wIrHw1
r�/IwMy�7N �i71 Jb�YIR�l�w1f 171 J�1711�Nppi7R .Yl1N Jl�k Mt 111MO 11�y1w•R
� 7111 Uf Jelly # ISR 14 allwn aR 1! iMd IO�1M !R �I111! �I 1�1Y w1
��I M �a � craw Aww4�A1f ar IA! 1s�r wn .Yl arw LI �W
n �s��11bn7ewoa°�0r °!!'�1a11N°i � n10Mi7 >� ro1�r1 ww1 i�`�r! rlY7pl�inl�rriYrY�a
�u w now11 waaaw luau ,rwwu r�Cw s11
w1P16a1s7 # . 71. 0!. 111wY aN. >K �d YNNm 1171amaw
m R s. Y b w7 # tla11Y�Y ]w R w i ww1 1 wM1 YNWM
w R M&A 1a1 A NO YIMM 1 1 11110 i mwma m swum ANORM An%"
a7An w 11171r 1Ma a
W A n aOlArs a1f Ja1r�M s jIR
AR7VOD wt Alwl OFIM MW # ■wR�1 M Y
�p1Y >Ow sw wlaw Im"41 a! a =UM aN Jou in OWN"
II
.conA I nurnli,'t) bs9M
�-iov�)'iu?. MEA lenoirz�hn9
scoae AW ,3JJn WIDOW ,eB& xoa .0.4
sora-aar :oA sasr-*o. (no) :3MONa
iq1
iia�I�i=>11�
•.���plY �ri1�� i1
aYwlil crawl �sw wa111aA1aa w �w w ��1� d L R � •
YrY .aww11 M iM. all aal7aw 1171111 # X11. # > ��1� j
itl11rN U WA
WA
am AMa a71
wa1 �
mp�1 wl w1s11r�y1p
US � 4 rsa 8
ivmjwJ�
11 ��
Ganga171u wows r) r i!
As OWN
.0 aur► aaarnr rirr r� s
sa w71r�a�l��
a.>rnrYA1 . aar ram
Woke" u waw �arM
■` CITY OF OLYMPUS VFLLA Put (LWNO--xxx)
RENTbN RENTON, WASHINcI)
Vi
Na wey,s sl er cArt Frrn -.-,•-,•,_•..•.
ag6 iF
,� 5
- fi
• I
_ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ `
NILE AVENUE NE
..,..... r. _
` n \
_ .. .......
_. H`Mw 6k.
z
�C
/ind..I
....... _.
Q
�
n
z
`
'
N
W
Z
b
--
ti
a
�
J
a
..
fTSfQ"vIVENIIE NE'
-.mom...,_--
_
"°* f --
r
•`�
��
�-------
gg �
r
gg
j
OLYMPUS VILLA
OF FE ENGINEERS
BILL FINKBEINER
DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN
,� ��
—.. _ m «• OLYMPUS VUA. PLAT (LUA10—XXX)
tRCITY OFMpL RENION, WASHINGTON
RENTON
�� fYo�nlrq jBuilllnp/Pudk YwrY
u0. I Y RMSgX 9Y MiE Mne .-.� a�•••••••
OLYMPUS VILLA OFFEENGNEERS
o
SILL FINKBEINER
c:cw lk
GRADING PLAN K
CITY OF OLYMPUS VILLA PLAT (LUA14-XXX) �x/ca/xolo
RENTON RENTON, WASHINGTON
— — — —
gra. - vcnsbx I er i aArc r.avv ..� e.� ^u ^a/^�a� wda o.n.
9
s
;.........„............_ z
_ _ NILE AVENUE
'N�E^�y
x
fir' 1J�
y��56
Ln
u5
`'
Ln
I
m
¢'
38
4—..................•
<1
b
Z
+' ,J
J
e
II
x' 7
O
1 S
'
�I 0
U
t ww
i
II
Ik� 2
T
...
, i ./
4
le
it
L' sA
b
jT
PASCO'iVEN w:'
t
,
•�
WPM
o
r c -
I ol
qy a
g
vnaccs
OLYMPUS VILLA
OFFE ENcmEERS
BILL FINKBEINER
-
UTILITY PLAN
as
o�
-MS2L, OLYMPUS VILLA PLAT LL1A10—%XX} :/./polo
AM CITY LM01
I RE TON RENTON• WASHINGTON
_— 1 y� I tt � MNM Pbnnkq%B�'IHM%P�W�'�M4 .
Denis Law -
Mayor �lY Uf,
j._ -s,
;Jil Ir
Community & Economic Development Department
December 7, 2015 C.E."Chip"Vin cent, Administrator
CIT` C)P-L RENTON°
Erin Hopkins DEC 07 201
Toll Brothers
1�1=c1=1vED
9720 NE 120`h Pl, Suite 200 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Kirkland, WA 98034
SUBJECT: Receipt of 2nd and 3rd Annual Wetland Maintenance and Monitoring Reports
Olympus Villa Residential Plat Mitigation Project
City of Renton File LUA10-090
Dear Erin Hopkins:
received and reviewed the third annual Maintenance and Monitoring Report for the
Olympus Villa Residential Plat mitigation project on November 30, 2015. 1 am also in
receipt of the second annual Maintenance and Monitoring Report for the mitigation
project that has a report date of November 20, 2014. In review of both reports, the
project appears to be meeting its established performance standards and is considered in
compliance.
Please review the Maintenance and Monitoring Plan for the standards of success related
to plant survival percentages and non-native cover percentages. The plan dated
December 16, 2010 may be different than the percentages listed in the submitted report
in the "Standards of Success" subsection although the submitted reports identify that the
project appears to meet the standards.
In addition, please take the necessary measures as recommended by your wetland
biologist to secure the survival of the plantings and non-native plant coverages.
Three copies of your next scheduled maintenance and monitoring report are due to the
city by November 20, 2016. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-
6593.
Sincerely,
]Cris Sorensen, Associate Planner
Planning Division
cc: Ed Sewall, Sewall Wetland Consulting/ Wetland Ecologist
City of Renton File LUAIO-090
Renton City Hal! • 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov
11
r:71ll'Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
PO Box 880 Phone: 253-85 15
_ — Fall Gty, WA %24
November 24, 2015
RocaIe Timmons
City of Renton
Department of Community and Economic Development
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98057
Re: Olympus Villa — Year 3 Report
SWC Job#10-144
City of Renton File LUAO-090
Dear Rocale,
This report describes the results of Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. Year 3 monitoring of
the Olympus Villa mitigation project.
Vicinity 1Vlap
HE 14tH P1
m
NE Dth 51
NE 1Cin SI
sE '191h
Sr
SF i101h G+
SE 4161h sl
NF Stn nt
n' NE �'r Sr —t`
nvii1,,
p 4E BtR G m
F.!A
�
f.
,;rt•:,r,
y
m
M
F;^t mh St
a NE ifh C.
$E ' 201R St
D
yE
'thC.
t1114'
"M 1r
SrrE
CSE
NC
7thP
m
NT 7th 51+
�fi
FA m
m
�n of
i
NE Ott
SE 124th
S1 �. NE t➢tR St
&E t2W
9
=4 4E 5n
$E !751h $r
SE 120th 51
NE 5t, $I
Y
TIE Ath
C1
NE a!n. R
Fav I -I..
?
S£ 121Yt Pr
SE 12Etl1 51
NE 41h 51
SE 12Mh at
x Nr 3'd PI
NE Tru Lnm
r1E 3,d C1
z' S
NE 3:d P
m
w
m NE I'd SI
`+£ NEE 3M St
z
r
y m
�11
S
m
F
m
Vicinity 1Vlap
0
0
Dlyrnptes Villa
5ctivall 66edand Consulting, Inc.
,Voyernber 24, 2015
Page 2 of 9
The site located on the east side of Nile Avenue NE (148th Avenue SE) in the City of
Renton, Washington (the "site"). Specifically, the site consists of an irregular shaped
parcel in a portion of the SW '14 of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East of the
Willamette Meridian in Icing County, Washington.
1.0 WETLAND MITIGATION CONCEPT AND GOALS
1.1 Mitigation Concept
The proposed project included the expansion of the existing wetland by 6,269sf as well as
enhancement of the previously degraded buffer area through the removal of Himalayan
blackberry and the installation of a mix of native trees and shrubs.
1.2 Mitigation Goals
1.2.1 Enhance the wetland buffer though planting of native trees and shrubs.
1.2.3 Create 6,269sf area of wetland.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Although the success and final outcome of wetland mitigation, restoration and
enhancement projects is never guaranteed, certain procedures can be utilized to increase
the probability of success. One of the most important procedures for success following
proper design and installation is the establishment of a monitoring plan to track changes
and developments within the system. Monitoring provides the opportunity to evaluate
the success of planted material within the system and observe early establishment of
pioneer and volunteer species. By observing the success of planted and volunteer species
during the first five years of the project, it may be possible to speculate on the
successional pathway taken, and general success of the project.
Monitoring at the Olympus Villa mitigation area is to be conducted eight times over a
five year period. Monitoring will be conducted four times the first year, and once a year
for the following four years.
This report represents the results of monitoring for Year 3 with fieldwork conducted in
May and November of 2015.
During each site visit the overall success and rigor of the installation plantings is to be
evaluated. Observations will also be made for any exotic/invasive species or native
volunteer vegetation which may have entered the area. In addition, the wetland creation
0 0
Ulvmpars Villcr
Seivall HWland Consulting, Inc,
November- 24, 2015
Page 3 0f'9
areas will be monitored during the early growing season for proper wetland hydrology.
Sampling methodology is described in section 4.0 below.
3.0 STANDARDS OF SUCCESS
As described in the approved plan, the standards of success for the project are as follows;
1. Evaluation of the success of ft m Baton protect wtl be Dared upon an W% surreal rate for al" p!anteo
woody vegetaran at the and of Year 5.
2. Vo!urrleer native, norwnvasrue species wil' be muded as aocoptalA components of the mitigation success,
3. Success of the mitgation within the miCgeCon areas wit be deWrrdned by
Year 1: ;00 % survival of at: Dlantad shrubs and trees, 517% ground cover of herbaceous vegetatlon
Year 2. 80% survival of planted material arse 60% or greater ground eover of herpao xws
vegetation
Year 3: 55 % aerW shrub Coverage at the and of Year 3 and 70 % Nybateous ground cover
Year 4: 15 % aer3a' shrub coverage at ft end of Year 4
Year 5. 80% "a- sMub ooverage, at the end of Year 5 and 90%. gmur d caner of herbaceous
"getatior,
4. Not more man 10014 cover of non-native rsvasve species wlthIn m!tlgatlon area during any of the 5 years.
S. Voiurdeer nait4e, iron-fwaslve species wtlr be ncuded as acceptable components of the mltlgatbn.
6. Successful hydmogy wl be determiners by whether loll sahm tion or inundatlon occurs during the easy
grow! +g season. Specrtaty, hydrology stWd meet the cMera as stated in the Oepwnment of Army Corp of
Engineers Mmeaton rrsanuai r, Wing the *@Mom regional suppiernant.
4.0 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
The mitlgalon area wit be monitored 7 Imes over a IN"aar period. Monitoring will to conducted twice the
first two yea's (once in the early growing season and once In the fall) and once per year in the following three
years- Man," w111 be conducted using the tchn"s and procedures desmbod below to quantfy"
survival, relative health and growtr of plant materia; as well as the sucomN onhancemerrt of the buffer
vegeta w. A vrgte monitorirsg report submitted at the end of each monitorkng year w€D describe and quantify
(the status of the mitigation at that, erne.
The vege4itan and hyCrorogy ON be monitored during the site v€stt condumd during each momioring year.
Vegetation
All the vlanted matanai in 1,e r rt'gaWn area will be �hspected during each moniWng v{sit to determine the
level of survival of the ;nsteilatcn. The i ea`th arxi vigor of the plants and the overall cordtion of lite mil€gation
areas sun ll be noted. !-"ft, Y+gorous plant rhaterrdr rill be dowrnerited to determine both owerall suooess of
the 0anfings and indiwtduai species success.
Vegetatnn montonng will be corwWted during each site visit of each monitoring year and aril[ ire domAv%ntad
In a single report prepared at ft end of each moniloring year.
Hydrology
Hydrology rr1 I be monitored Woe the 5rst and secmd year and once each of the fortowing years. Hydrology
wfl De monaored in the spring (early growing season) lo detleni no that adequate ire@and hydrology has bee^
obtained wd++n fihe wattand creaton area. Hydroiogy wkl be rnoofted by (sand exwvating a smat hole to a
depth of 16�nches and the data wit be recorded. The iocatlons of hydrology mo6toring pits will be indcod
on a map with in the monWng report.
0
0
Olympia 11711a
Sewall 11"e land Consulling, Inc.
November- 24, 2015
Page 4 of 9
5.0 OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION OF SITE CONDITIONS
The following is our observations of the mitigation site taken in May and November of
2015.
5.1 YEAR 3
5.1.1 Survival Statistics for Installed Plant Material
A total of 588 planst were installed initially and following this Year 3 there were a total
of 5 dead cedar, 4 dead douglas fir and I I dead red osier dogwood. This accounts for
3.4% mortality or 96.6% survival. The survival rate at this time exceeds the 80% criteria
for Year 3. Herbaceous ground cover is 100% throughout the mitigation site.
5.1.2 Invasive vegetation
The enhanced buffer area was originally covered with blackberry. As a result, control of
blackberry on this site will need to be closely monitored. Blackberry maintenance has
been ongoing since the installation, and currently blackberry coverage (as well as all
other weedy species) is very low with only a few small scattered blackberry shoots
present representing < 5% of aerial coverage. This meets the criteria required of not
more than 10% weedy species coverage. Blackberry control will be performed again in
April to insure this stays below the 15% threshold.
5. t.3 Hydrology
The wetland creation areas contained standing water in May as well as November of
2015 and this meets wetland hydrology criteria as this is several months into the growing
season.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS
The site is meeting al l of the monitoring requirements for Year 3,
The Year 4 yearly monitoring is scheduled to take place in October of 2016 with a report
to the City to follow shortly.
0
0
Olympus Villa
Sewall VY'etland Consulting, Inc.
November 24, 2015
Page 5 qf'9
If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact me at (253)
859-0515 or by email at esewall@sewallwc.com.
Sincerely,
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
Ed Sewall
Senior Wetland Ecologist PWS #212
E
0
Olwyllms Villa
Seivull J'Vedund Considling, Inc.
November 24, 2015
Page 6 of 9
--
.7
-
E
0
Olwyllms Villa
Seivull J'Vedund Considling, Inc.
November 24, 2015
Page 6 of 9
&VT RC"O&TAffA'rxtANTWGvSr
P-'M700iff VF APACLVO
_W(S
7----1---'-'-"-------------
--
Pao* A*~
y 00, or ut,
AW
S,u smea
or.
act
alom F,
FOG'
1
in
M AIX,"
L
4mrothu
4101'
4q,
ROM
1,6w roc
00
D
6. d9
A,*VO qw%wwr
w
Ic.r Dvgw C -VO
Ipw
M&TV rkwww
SAJMW
&VT RC"O&TAffA'rxtANTWGvSr
P-'M700iff VF APACLVO
_W(S
7----1---'-'-"-------------
--
Pao* A*~
y 00, or ut,
AW
S,u smea
or.
alom F,
FOG'
1
in
M AIX,"
L
4mrothu
4101'
Af r -JW MCA WN A AqT WG UST
Ov7p JYAV-Oaw SU!F e.VAC04
MM
Pao* A*~
y 00, or ut,
AW
XF 0*%W
1
in
ipw 4'49 , C
L
4mrothu
. �r�
ROM
1,6w roc
A,*VO qw%wwr
w
Ic.r Dvgw C -VO
Ipw
M&TV rkwww
SAJMW
Af r -JW MCA WN A AqT WG UST
Ov7p JYAV-Oaw SU!F e.VAC04
MM
Pao* A*~
y 00, or ut,
AW
'w
Pao* A*~
y 00, or ut,
AW
1
in
ipw 4'49 , C
L
4mrothu
. �r�
r]
Above and below:
0
Olympus Villa
Sewall Ifedund Consulting, Inc.
November 24, 2015
Page 7 of 9
area November 2015
0
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
November 24, 1015
Page 8 of 9
Above: Looking northeast of southern creation area November 2015
0
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
November 24, 2015
Page 9 of'9
Above: looking south along south end of mitigation area November 2015
0
L J
f'
AMP,
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
..........
M BOX 880 Phone: 25aS59-0615
Fall Gty, WA 98024
December 31, 2013
Rocale Timmons
City of Renton
Department of Community and Economic Development
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98057
Re: Olympus Villa — Year I- 4th Quarterly Report
SWC Job#10-144
City of Renton Filed=99@— L U A l,0 — ()q 4
Dear Rocale,
This report describes the results of Sewall Welland Consulting, Inc. fourth quarter
monitoring of the Olympus Villa mitigation project.
a
" th'',1
k m
5E °ifinY 36 PIC: 0 1 5E 1MhSt
11
Vicinity JUCIP
RIO— 195.
—
r
—
r
m
-
a
" th'',1
k m
5E °ifinY 36 PIC: 0 1 5E 1MhSt
11
Vicinity JUCIP
RIO— 195.
u
r�
v
Olympus Tilly
.Sewall I'Vetland Consulting, Inc.
December 31, 2014
Page 2 q f 10
The site located on the east side of Nile Avenue NE (I48th Avenue SE) in the City of
Renton, Washington (the "site"). Specifically, the site consists of an irregular shaped
parcel in a portion of the SW '/a of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range S East of the
Willamette Meridian in King County, Washington.
1.0 WETLAND MITIGATION CONCEPT AND GOALS
1,1 Mitigation Concept
The proposed project included the expansion of the existing wetland by 6,269sf as well as
enhancement of the previously degraded buffer area through the removal of Himalayan
blackberry and the installation of a mix of native trees and shrubs.
1.2 Mitigation Goals
1.2.1 Enhance the wetland buffer though planting of native trees and shrubs.
1.2.3 Create 6,269sf area of wetland.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Although the success and final outcome of wetland mitigation, restoration and
enhancement projects is never guaranteed, certain procedures can be utilized to increase
the probability of success. One of the most important procedures for success following
proper design and installation is the establishment of a monitoring plan to track changes
and developments within the system. Monitoring provides the opportunity to evaluate
the success of planted material within the system and observe early establishment of
pioneer and volunteer species. By observing the success of planted and volunteer species
during the first five years of the project, it may be possible to speculate on the
successional pathway taken, and general success of the project.
Monitoring at the Olympus Villa mitigation area is to be conducted eight times over a
five year period. Monitoring will be conducted four times the first year, and once a year
for the following four years.
This report represents the fourth quarter report for Year 1 with fieldwork conducted on in
October of 2013.
During each site visit the overall success and rigor of the installation plantings is to be
evaluated. Observations will also be made for any exotic/invasive species or native
volunteer vegetation which may have entered the area. In addition, the wetland creation
0 0
Olympus f hila
Sewall 66e11and Consulting, Inc.
December 31, 2014
Page 3 of - 10
areas will be monitored during the early growing season for proper wetland hydrology.
Sampling methodology is described in section 4.0 below.
3.0 STANDARDS OF SUCCESS
As described in the approved plan, the standards of success for the project are as follows;
1, Evaluation of the success of the mitigation project w;l I be based upon an 80% survival rate for all plaited
woody vegetation at to and of Fear 5.
2, tlolunteer native, ron-invasive species will be included as acceptable components of the mitigaton success.
3. 5u;.eess of the mitigation within the rni igation areas will be dete,nrl by
Year 1: 100 °`, survluai of a'i olanted shrubs and trees, 50% ground cover of herbaceous vegetation
Year 2: 801% suralva' of planted material and 60;', or greater ground cover of herbaceous
vegetatlor.
Year 3: 55 % aerial shrub coverage at the end of Year 3 and 10 % he:,baceous ground cover
Year 4: 75 % aerie I shrub coverage at the end of Year 4
Year 5: 80% aerial shrub coverage at the end of Year 5 and 90%, ground cover of herbaceous
vegetation
4, Not more than 1GOX, cover of non-ra Ova Ir'.vaslve sperles'wlthin mItlgatlon area cfurlrg ary of the 5 years.
5. Volunteer native, non -Invasive species will be Iriduded as acceptable compor^ents of the mitigation.
8. Successful hydro'l wl 1 he determ'red by whether soil saturation or lnundatlon occurs during the early
growing season. Specifically hycrDlogy shouid meet the ulterla as stated n the Reparill of Army Corp of
Engineers del neatlon manual including the western regional supplement,
4.0 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
Tie Tillcgailnn ,area will be monitored 7 times over a'Ive-year perlod, MonlziWnp will tie cnrducted twlce the
first nvo years {once in the early grooving season and once in the fall) and once per year in the following fr:ree
years. Monitoring will be conducted using the tech riques and procedur€:s describes be ow to quantify the
survival, relative health and growth of plant motorial as well as tse successful enhancement ufihe buffer
vegetation. A single nonimring report submitted at the end of each monitoring year will describe and quarill
the status of the mitigaWn: al tial time.
T:ie vegetation and r'yorology will be monit,� ed during the site vTs t conducted during each monitoring year.
`Jege:ation
Ail the planted material in ire mitigation area will be Inspected during eactn monitoring v;sif to determine Na
level of survival of the insialIzilor. Tire liealttt and vlgnr of the plants and tf e overall coidillon of the miticatior
areas will be noted,-lealtny, vigol plant materia will ce doc�mentert to determine bntn overal I success of
the ;darlings and individual species success.
Jegetation monitoring will be completed during each site v sit of each monitoring year and will be documented
In a sli e report prepared at the end of each monitar nc year.
Hydrology
Hydrology will be mo-Ored twice the first and sel year and once each of the iullovil years. Hydrology
swill be monitored in the surlig ;early growing season) to determirne :hat adeCuate wetland hydrology has ween
obtained within the *l creation arl hydrology will be moniicred by trans excav-ating a small hole to a
depth of ` nches and the data will be recorded. The locarlons ,f hydrology monilot:ng pits wal ce indicated
on a map1ht n tine r ionituring report.
0
0
Olvmpus [illa
Setivall 4'etland Consuhing. Inc.
December 31, 2014
Page 4 of 10
5.0 OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION OF SITE CONDITIONS
The following is our observations of the mitigation site taken in July of 2013.
5.1 FOURTH QUARTER
5.1.1 Survival Statistics for Installed Plant Material
As required by the Year 1 criteria, the survival rate for all planted species is 100% at this
time. Herbaceous ground cover is 100% except in the wetland creation area which is
approximately 70% right now.
5.1.2 Invasive vegetation
The enhanced buffer area was originally covered with blackberry. As a result, control of
blackberry on this site will need to be closely monitored. Blackberry maintenance has
been ongoing since the installation, and currently blackberry coverage (as well as all
other weedy species) is very low with only a few small scattered blackberry shoots
present representing < 5% of aerial coverage. This meets the criteria required of not
more than 10% weedy species coverage. Blackberry control will be performed again in
April to insure this stays below the 15% threshold.
5.1.3 Hydrology
The wetland creation areas contained standing water from recent rains.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS
The site is meeting all of the monitoring requirements for Year 1.
The Year 2 yearly monitoring is scheduled to take place in October of 2014 with a report
to the City to follow shortly.
r1
u
O) ympars [ 11a
Sewall [Felland Consulting, Inc.
December 31, 201,E
Page S of 10
If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact me at (253)
859-0515 or by email at esewall asewallwc.com.
Sincerely,
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
Ed Sewall
Senior Wetland Ecologist PWS #2l2
0
Olympus Villa
,Sewall Welland Consulting, Inc.
December 31, 2014
Page 6 of 10
Above: Looking south across north wetland creation area.
0
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
December 31, 2014
Page 7 of 10
Above and below: Looking northivest across south creation area.
0
0
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
December 31, 2014
Page 8 of 10
Above and below; Southern creation area
0
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
December 31, 2014
Page 9 of 10
Above: Looking east south buffer area
Below: looking south across western buffer.
0
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wedand Consulling, Inc.
December 31, 014
Page 10 of 10
Above: Looking east across northern buffer.
Denis Law
Crty of
Mayr i tib. - r�
`! A, .
♦ � i
rI` _ _ 41
Department of Community and Economic Development
C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator
November 14, 2013
Aaron Kopet
Cam West Olympus Villa, LLC
9720 NE 120th PI, Ste 100
Kirkland, WA 98034
Subject: Receipt of Third Quarterly Monitoring Report
Olympus Villa Mitigation
City of Renton File LUA10-090
Dear Mr. Kopet:
This letter is to inform you that on September 24'", 2013 1 received the third quarterly
monitoring report for the Olympus Villa mitigation project.
The project appears to be meeting performance standards. Two copies of the fourth quarterly
monitoring report were due to the City on October 24, 2013. Please submit copies of this report
as soon as possible. If you have any questions I can be reached at (425) 430-7382.
Sincerely,
trald Wasser, Planner
Current Planning Division
cc: City of Renton File LUAIO-090
Ed Sewall, Sewall Wetland Consulting
Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
September 24 2013
ok
Rocale Timmons � 3
City of Renton
Department of Community and Economic Development
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98057
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
27641 Cm ington Way SF #2 Phone: 253-859.0515
Covu-igtm WA %042 Fa)c_ 25-x.5247,42
Re: Olympus Villa — Year 1- 3rd Quarterly Report
SWC Job#10-144
lCity of itm-File LUAP-M
Dear Rocale,
101,11A m
a alP,
oor S'M!cj 61�ru a
This report describes the results of Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. third quarter
monitoring of the Olympus Villa mitigation project.
tX !Ott P1
E 1311N Se NE.10� S, m
� N� Nrh Ct m
z
$c
I; Rh s; SL I1' m 9!
-€Yittectrfy Iq�
Sc'x.-p
ht $In ,may
' tk ttb! a1'
ith P Smr
� A
ozr,M
p
in
m A N
r..
ith 5[ - SF '34th St s'
o a
NE 1x51h s1
� a t _
C,1 .. r
� N6 41R ry{
?.E 128th St � � NE fitly at
u
Z to -NE 7•c.P1 'n NE 3- In
4 5 - 14E Sia R
_. NE H!a 5l.
'A NF -o S.
NE
NE 7th W
NE 7[h i'
54
z
K
NE Em S. m. SS �gAv
s
a
NE Sr S° z p
z �
m n,
- - sE 1241h s
rz 3,d C1
U c X
S
o to m
Vicinity Map
n
m SE
}
M
0
...
v'r
,
F....,- y_
gc ;2i tk
- - sE 1241h s
rz 3,d C1
U c X
S
o to m
Vicinity Map
0 Olympus Villa
Sewall Weiland Consulting, Inc.
September 24, 2013
Page 2 o f 7
The site Iocated on the east side of Nile Avenue NE (148th Avenue SE) in the City of
Renton, Washington (the "site"). Specifically, the site consists of an irregular shaped
parcel in a portion of the SW `/4 of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East of the
Willamette Meridian in King County, Washington.
1.0 WETLAND MITIGATION CONCEPT AND GOALS
1.1 Mitigation Concept
The proposed project included the expansion of the existing wetland by 6,269sf as well as
enhancement of the previously degraded buffer area through the removal of Himalayan
blackberry and the installation of a mix of native trees and shrubs.
1.2 Mitigation Goals
1.2.1 Enhance the wetland buffer though planting of native trees and shrubs.
1.2.3 Create 6,269sf area of wetland.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Although the success and final outcome of wetland mitigation, restoration and
enhancement projects is never guaranteed, certain procedures can be utilized to increase
the probability of success. One of the most important procedures for success following
proper design and installation is the establishment of a monitoring plan to track changes
and developments within the system. Monitoring provides the opportunity to evaluate
the success of planted material within the system and observe early establishment of
pioneer and volunteer species. By observing the success of planted and volunteer species
during the first five years of the project, it may be possible to speculate on the
successional pathway taken., and general success of the project.
Monitoring at the Olympus Villa mitigation area is to be conducted eight times over a
five year period. Monitoring will be conducted four times the first year, and once a year
for the following four years.
This report represents the third quarter report for Year 1 with fieldwork conducted on in
July of 2013.
During each site visit the overall success and rigor of the installation plantings is to be
evaluated. Observations will also be made for any exotic/invasive species or native
volunteer vegetation which may have entered the area. In addition, the wetland creation
• 0 Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
Seplember 24, 2013
Page 3 q f 7
areas will be monitored during the early growing season for proper wetland hydrology.
Sampling methodology is described in section 4.0 below.
3.0 STANDARDS OF SUCCESS
As described in the approved plan, the standards of success for the project are as follows;
1. Evaluation of the success of the mltigation project wil I be based upon an 80% survival rate for al I planted
woody vegetation at the end of Year 5.
2. Volunteer native, non-invasive species wilt be included as acceptable components of the mitigation success.
3, Success of the mitigatlon within the mitigation areas will be determined by
Year t: 100 % survival of a II planted shrubs and trees, 50% ground cover of herbaceous vegetation
Year 2: 80% survival of planted material and 60% or greater ground cover of herbaceous
vegetation
Year 3: 55 % aeral shrub coverage at the end of Year 3 and Al % herbaceous ground cover
Year 4: 75 % aerial shrub coverage at the and of Year 4
Year 5: 80% aerial shrub coverage at the end of Year 5 and 00%, ground cover of herbaceous
vegetation
4. Not more than 10% cover of non-native invasive specles within mltlgatlon area during any of the 5 years.
5. Volunteer native, non-Invaslve specles will be Included as acceptable components of the mltlgatbn.
6. Successful hydrology will be determined by whether soli saturation or nundation occurs during the early
growing season. Specifically, hydrology should meet the criteria as stated In the Department of Army Corp of
Engineers delineation manual including the western regional supplement,
4,0 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
The mitigation area wl II be monitored 7 times over a flue -year period. Monitoring will be conducted twice the
first two years (once in the early growing season and once in the fal) and once per year in the following three
years. Monitoring W II be conducted using the techniques and procedures described below to quantify the
survival, relative health and growth of plant material as well as the successful enhancement of the buffer
vegetation. A single monitoring report submitted at the end of each monitoring year will describe and quantify
the status of the mitigation at that time.
The vegetation and hydrology wilt be monitored during the site visit conducted during each monitoring year.
Vegetation
All the planted material in the mitigation area will be inspected during each mon itoring visit to determine the
level of survival of the installation, The health and vigor of the plants and the overall condition of the mitigation
areas will be noted. Healthy, vigorous plant material wil I be documented to determine both overal I success of
the plantings and individual species success.
Vegetation monitoring will be completed during each site visit of each monitoring year and will be documented
In a single report prepared at the end of each monitodng year.
Hydrology
Hydrology wil I be monitored twice the first and second year and once each of the following years. Hydrology
will be monitored in the spring (early growing season) to determine that adequate wetland hydrology has been
obtained within the wetland creation area. Hydrology wil I be monitored by hand excavating a small hole to a
depth of 16 -inches and the data will be recorded. The locations of hydrology monitoring pits will be indicated
on a map within the monitoring report.
0 Olympus Villa
Sewall Weiland Consulting, Inc.
September 24, 2013
Page 4 of 7
5.0 OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION OF SITE CONDITIONS
The following is our observations of the mitigation site taken in July of 2013.
5.1 THIRD QUARTER
5.1.1 Survival Statistics for Installed Plant Material
As required by the Year 1 criteria, the survival rate for all planted species is 100% at this
time. Herbaceous ground cover is 100% except in the wetland creation area which is
approximately 65% right now.
5.1.2 Invasive vegetation
The enhanced buffer area was originally covered with blackberry. As a result, control of
blackberry on this site will need to be closely monitored. Blackberry maintenance has
been ongoing since the installation, and currently blackberry coverage (as well as all
other weedy species) is very low with only a few small scattered blackberry shoots
present representing < 5% of aerial coverage. This meets the criteria required of not
more than 10% weedy species coverage. Some blackberry removal is necessary and will
be performed at this time to insure this stays below the 15% threshold.
5.1.3 Hydrology
The wetland creation areas were dry during our dry season review of the mitigation area
as would be expected at this time of year. The abutting undisturbed wetland was also
observed to be dry at this time.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS
The site is meeting all of the monitoring requirements for Year 1.
The Year 1, 4t'' quarter monitoring is scheduled to take place in October of 2013 with a
report to the City to follow shortly.
0 Olympus villa
Sewall Welland Consulting, Inc.
September- 24, 2013
Page 5 of 7
If you have any questions or need any additional infozz-nation please contact me at (253)
859-0515 or by email at esewalI@sewallwc.com.
Sincerely,
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
Ed Sewall
Senior Wetland Ecologist PWS #212
0 Olympus Villa
Sewall Welland Consulting, Ine_
September 24, 2013
Page 6 o f 7
Above: Looking east across north end of mitigation site.
0 Olympus villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
September 24, 2013
Page 7 of 7
Above: Looking southeast across wetland creation portion of mitigation site.
November 14, 2013
Aaron Kopet
CamWest Olympus Villa, LLC
9720 NE 120th Pl, Ste 100
Kirkland, WA 98034
Subject: Receipt of Third Quarterly Monitoring Report
Olympus Villa Mitigation
City of Renton File LUA10-090
Dear Mr. Kopet:
This letter is to inform you that on September 24th, 2013 1 received the third quarterly
monitoring report for the Olympus Villa mitigation project.
The project appears to be meeting performance standards. Two copies of the fourth quarterly
monitoring report were due to the City on October 24, 2013. Please submit copies of this report
as soon as„possible. If you have any questions I can be reached at (425) 430-7382.
Sincerely,
Gerald Wasser, Planner
Current Planning Division
cc: City of Renton File LUA10-090
Ed Sewall, Sewall Wetland Consulting
Denis Law
Mayor City 1}' r -J
r � -
May 28, 2013 Department of Community and Economic Development
C.E. "Chi p"Vincent, Administrator
Aaron Kopet
Cam West Olympus Villa, LLC
9720 NE 120th Pl, Suite 100
Kirkland, WA 98034
Subject: Receipt of Second Quarterly Monitoring Report
Olympus Villa Mitigation
City of Renton File LUA10-090
Dear Mr. Kopet:
This letter is to inform you that on April 24th I received the second quarterly monitoring report
for the Olympus Villa mitigation project.
The project appears to be meeting performance standards. Two copies of the third quarterly
monitoring report are due to the City by July 24, 2013. if you have any questions 1 can be
reached at (425) 430-7219.
Sincerely,
Cale''
R tale Timmons, Planner
Current Planning Division
cc: City of Renton File LUA10-090
Ed Sewall, Sewall Wetland Consulting
Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
253&
276T1Cm%0mWay SE#2 Mm 99 -MI5
CoOVim WA %M Fax: 253,9524M
April 23, 2013
Rocale Timmons
City of Renton
Department of Community and Economic Development
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98057
Re- Olympus Villa — Year 1- 2"' Quarterly Report
SWC Job# 10- 144
City of Renton' File LUAO-090
Dear Roeale,
This report describes the results of Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc. second quarter
monitoring of the Olympus Villa mitigation project.
Vicinity Map
1W �ICII l,
.1k
sin
1z
ro
tlk- V P. M
Inn, 31
411, St
SE Qath Si
>fd I
Vicinity Map
Olympus Villa
S'eivall Welland Consulting, Inc.
Aptil 23, 2013
Page 2 of '8
The site located on the east side of Nile Avenue NE (148th Avenue SE) in the City of
Renton, Washington (the "site"). Specifically, the site consists of an irregular shaped
parcel in a portion of the SW '/4 of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East of the
Willamette Meridian in King County, Washington.
1.0 WETLAND MITIGATION CONCEPT AND GOALS
1.1 Mitigation Concept
The proposed project included the expansion of the existing wetland by 6,269sf as well as
enhancement of the previously degraded buffer area through the removal of Himalayan
blackberry and the installation of a mix of native trees and shrubs.
1.2 Mitigation Goals
1.2.1 Enhance the wetland buffer though planting of native trees and shrubs.
1.2.3 Create 6,269sf area of wetland.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Although the success and final outcome of wetland mitigation, restoration and
enhancement projects is never guaranteed, certain procedures can be utilized to increase
the probability of success. One of the most important procedures for success following
proper design and installation is the establishment of a monitoring plan to track changes
and developments within the system. Monitoring provides the opportunity to evaluate
the success of planted material within the system and observe early establishment of
pioneer and volunteer species. By observing the success of planted and volunteer species
during the first five years of the project, it may be possible to speculate on the
successional pathway taken, and general success of the project.
Monitoring at the Olympus Villa mitigation area is to be conducted eight times over a
five year period. Monitoring will be conducted four times the first year, and once a year
for the following four years.
This report represents the second quarter report for Year 1 with fieldwork conducted on
April 22, 2013 _
During each site visit the overall success and rigor of the installation plantings is to be
evaluated. Observations will also be made for any exotic/invasive species or native
volunteer vegetation which may have entered the area. In addition, the wetland creation
Olympus colla
Sewall Welland Consulting, Inc_
April 23, 2013
Page 3 a f 8
areas will be monitored during the early growing season for proper wetland hydrology.
Sampling methodology is described in section 4.0 below.
3.0 STANDARDS OF SUCCESS
As described in the approved plan, the standards of success for the project are as follows,
1. Evaluation of the success of the mitigation project will be based upon an 8TIo survival rate for all planted
woody vegetation at the end of Year 5,
2. Volunteer native, non-invasive species will be included as acceptable components of the mitigation success.
3. Success of the mitigation within the mitigation areas will be determined by
Year l: 100 % survlvai of all planted shrubs and trees, 50% ground cover of herbaceous vegetation
Year 2: 80% survival of planted material and 60% or greater ground cover of herbaceous
vegetation
Year 3: 55 % aerial shrub coverage at the end of Year 3 and 7D % herbaceous ground cover
Year 4: 75 % aerial shrub coverage at the end of Year 4
Year 5: 80% aerial shrub coverage at the end of Year 5 and 900%, ground cover of herbaceous
vegetation
4. Not more than 101/6 cover of non-native Invaslve species w3thln mltlgat♦on area during any of the 5 years,
5. Volunteer native, non-Invaslve species will be Inciuded as acceptable components of the mltlgallon.
6. Successful hydrology will be determined by whether sell saturation or Inundation occurs during the early
growing season. Speclflcally, hydrology should meet the crfterla as stated In the Department of Army Corp of
Engineers delinealion manual including the western regional supplement,
4.0 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
The mitigation area will be monitored 7 times over a five-year period. Monitoring will be conducted twice the
first two years (once in the early growing season and once in the fai) and once per year in the following three
years. Monitoring will be conducted using the techniques and procedures described below to quantity the
survival. relative health and growth of plant material as well as the successfui enhancement of the buffer
vegetation. A single monitoring report submitted at the end of each monitoring year will describe and quantify
the status of the mitigation at that time.
The vegetation and hydrdogy will be monitored during the site visit conducted during each monitoring year.
Vegetation
All the planted material In the Ktigation area will be inspected during each monitoring visit to determine the
level of survival of the installation. The health and vlgor of the plants and the overall condition of the mitigation
areas wlli be noted. Healthy, vigorous plant material will be documented to determine bath overall success of
the plantings and individual species success,
Vegetation monitoring will be completed during each site visit of each monitoring year and will be documented
In a single report prepared at the end of each monitortng year,
Hydrology
Hydrology will be monitored twice the fast and second year and once each of the following years, Hydrology
will be monitored in the spring (early growing season) to determine that adequate wetland hydrology has been
obtained within the wetland creation area. Hydrology will tie monitored by hand excavating a small hole to a
depth of 166inches and the data will be recorded. The #ocations of hydfology monitoring pits will be indicated
on a map within the monitoring report.
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc_
April 23, 2013
Page 4 of 8
5.0 OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION OF SITE CONDITIONS
The following is our observations of the mitigation site taken on April 22, 2013,
5.1 SECOND QUARTER
5.1.1 Survival Statistics for Installed Plant Material
As required by the Year 1 criteria, the survival rate for all planted species is 100% at this
time. Herbaceous ground cover is 100% except in the wetland creation area which is
approximately 65% right now.
5.1.2 Invasive vegetation
The enhanced buffer area was originally covered with blackberry. As a result, control of
blackberry on this site will need to be closely monitored. Blackberry maintenance has
been ongoing since the installation, and currently blackberry coverage (as well as all
other weedy species) is very low with only a few small scattered blackberry shoots
present representing < 1% of aerial coverage. This meets the criteria required of not
more than 10% weedy species coverage.
5.1.3 Hydrology
The wetland creation areas had standing water in depths from l "-3" in the northern
creation area and 1 "-6" in the southern creation area, clearly meeting the wetland
hydrology criteria as this observation in April is well into the growing season.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS
The site is meeting all of the monitoring requirements for Year 1.
The Year 1 3rd quarter monitoring is scheduled to take place in July of 2013 with a report
to the City to follow shortly.
Olympus Villa
Sewall Weiland Consulting, Inc.
April 23, 2013
Page 5 of '8
If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact me at (253)
859-0515 or by email at esewall@sewallwc.com,
Sincerely,
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
Ed Sewall
Senior Wetland Ecologist PWS #212
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
April 23, 2013
Page 6 of 8
Above: Looking east across north end of mitigation site 4-22-I3.
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
Apel 23, 2013
Page 7 of S
i.
a
Above: Looking south along the southern end of the mitigation site 4-22-13.
Above: Looking southeast across wetland creatiotr pon, ion of mitigation site 4-22-!
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
April 23, 2013
Page 8 of 8
Above: Looking northwest across wetland creation portion of mitigation site 4-22-13.
Denis Law
IY Of
Mayori f
�rg
ir
I&
April 19, 2013 Department of Community and Economic Development
C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator
Bruce Knowlton
CamWest Olympus Villa, LLC
9720 NE 120th PI, Ste 100
Kirkland, WA 98034
Subject: Receipt of First Quarterly Monitoring Report
Olympus Villa Mitigation
City of Renton File LUA10-090
Dear Mr. Knowlton:
This letter is to inform you that on January 181h i received the first quarterly monitoring report
for the Olympus Villa mitigation project.
The project appears to be meeting performance standards: Two copies of the second quarterly
monitoring report are due to the City by April 24, 2013. If you have any questions 1 can be
reached at (425) 430-7219.
Sincerely,
R ale Timmons, Planner
Current Planning Division
cc: City of Renton File LUA10-090
Ed Sewall, Sewall Wetland Consulting
Renton City Ball • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov
• v
l�i��e�!rl, �,
_. ..._...-. ---- Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
- 27641 Covmgbn Way SE #2 Phone: 253&99-0515
Covington WA 98042 Fax 25.3-8524732
January 11, 2013 JgIV .18 10?3
Rocale Timmons .!� r+_ ,`- r•=
City of Renton
Department of Community and Economic Development
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98057
Re: Olympus Villa — Year I - l" Quarterly Report
SWC Job#10-144
City of Renton File LUAO-090
Dear Rocale,
This report describes the results of Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc- first quarter
monitoring of the Olympus Villa mitigation project.
Nc r01n � � m
to
NE IPM St NE 14th 51 m
SE 11[irh 5t Sc 110th gl
NE 7rh C
11Aj� 7!h P $nE
m
NE -[h P
NE 7M st T
„NF. 15th stm
w A
5. iZath St a' NE sm Sf m si :24K'
21
a
RE
c
it ME q;, Ss
zNE Sth PI
9
2
NE BN G
m
T
NE Bt^ 51
F
of nt -C
8E ! 1 [Nh 51
NE 7rh C
11Aj� 7!h P $nE
m
NE -[h P
NE 7M st T
„NF. 15th stm
w A
5. iZath St a' NE sm Sf m si :24K'
21
a
m
zNE Sth PI
s
SE i2Sth st ?
F
9E '29th 51
F,
NE 51h 81
Z
T
NE Ch G
-
M
B
m
�tlS 9
n =
SE 128th StNE
m
I 41h Sl
SE 120B+St
:v= PI
's
r1E 3';: :n
tSL 3,6,;t
9
NE 3M Pt
v Nr 3rd St
m
NE?^n Sl
T
�a
Vicinity Map
i
a
m
9
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
January 11, 203
Page 2 of 8
The site located on the cast side of Nile Avenue NE (148th Avenue SE) in the City of
Renton, Washington (the "site")_ Specifically, the site consists of an irregular shaped
parcel in a portion of the SW'/, of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 5 East of the
Willamette Meridian in King County, Washington.
1.0 WETLAND MITIGATION CONCEPT AND GOALS
1.1 Mitigation Concept
The proposed project included the expansion of the existing wetland by 6,269sf as well as
enhancement of the previously degraded buffer area through the removal of Himalayan
blackberry and the installation of a mix of native trees and shrubs.
1.2 Mitigation Goals
1.2.1 Enhance the wetland buffer though planting of native trees and shrubs.
1.23 Create 6,269sf area of wetland.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
Although the success and final outcome of wetland mitigation, restoration and
enhancement projects is never guaranteed, certain procedures can be utilized to increase
the probability of success. One of the most important procedures for success following
proper design and installation is the establishment of a monitoring plan to track changes
and developments within the system. Monitoring provides the opportunity to evaluate
the success of planted material within the system and observe early establishment of
pioneer and volunteer species. By observing the success of planted and volunteer species
during the first five years of the project, it may be possible to speculate on the
successional pathway taken, and general success of the project.
Monitoring at the Olympus Villa mitigation area is to be conducted eight times over a
five year period_ Monitoring will be conducted four times the first year, and once a year
for the following four years,
This report represents the fourth quarter report for Year 1.
During each site visit the overall success and rigor of the installation plantings is to be
evaluated. Observations will also be made for any exotic/invasive species or native
volunteer vegetation which may have entered the area. In addition, the wetland creation
areas will be monitured during the early growing season foi• proper wetland hydrology.
Sampling methodology is described in section 4.0 below,
0
3.0 STANDARDS OF SUCCESS
is
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
January 11, 2013
Page 3 of 8
As described in the approved plan, the standards of success for the project are as follows;
1. Evaluation of the success of the mitigation project will be based upon an 80°% survival rate for all planted
woody vegetation at the end of Year 5.
2. Volunteer native, noMnvasive species will be included as acceptable components of the mitigation success.
3. Success of the mitigation within the mitigation area will be determined by
Year 1; 100 °% survival of all planted shrubs and trees. 50°% ground cover of herbaceous vegetation
Year 2; 80% survival of planted material and 60°% or greater ground cover of herbaceous
vegetation
Year 3; 55 % aerial shrub coverage at the end of Year 3 and 70 % herbaceous ground cover
Year 4; 75 "% aerial shrub coverage at the end of Year 4
Year 5; 80% aerial shrub coverage at the er�d of Year 5 and 80%, ground cover of herbaceous
vegetation
4. Not more than 10°% cover of non-native Invasive species within mitigation area during any of the 5 years.
5. Volunteer native, noninvasive species will be Included as acceptable components of the mitigation.
6. Successful hydrology will be determined by whether soil saturation or Inundation occurs during the early
growing season. Specifically, hydrology should meet the crlterla as stated In the Department of Army Corp of
Engineers dellneatlon manual Including the western regional supplement,
4.0 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
The mitigation area will be monitored 7 times over a five-year p&od. Monitoring will be conducted twice the
first two years (once in the early growing season and once in the fall) and once per year in the following three
years. Monitoring will be conducted using the techniques and procedures descr bed below to quantify the
survival, relative health and growth of plant material as well as the successful enhancement of the buffer
vegetation. A single monitoring report submitted at the and of each monitoring year will describe and quantity
the status of the mitigation at that time.
The vegetation and hydrology Oil be monitored during the site visit conducted during each manitaring year.
Vegetation
I All the planted material in the mitigation area will be inspected during each monitoring visit to determine the
level of survival of the Installation. The health and vigor of the plants and the overall condition of the mitigation
areas will be noted. Healthy, vigorous plant material will be documented to determine both overall success of
the plantings and individual species success,
Vegetation monitoring will be completed during each site visit of each monitoring year and will be documented
In a single report prepared at the end of each monitoring year.
Hydrology
Hydrology will be monitored twice the first and second year and once each of the following years. Hydrology
will be monitored in the spring (early growing season) to determine that adequate wetland hydrology has been
obtained within the wetland creation area. Hydrology will be monitored by hand excavating a small hole to a
depth of 116 -inches and the data will be recorded. The locations of hydrology monitoring pits will be indicated
on a map with In the monitoring report.
0 0
Olympus Villa
sS'eivall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
.Ianuary 11, 1013
Page a a f 8
5.0 OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSION OF SITE CONDITIONS
The following is our observations of the mitigation site taken on January 3, 2013.
5.1 FIRST QUARTER
5.1.1 Survival Statistics for Installed Plant Material
As required by the Year 1 criteria, the survival rate for all planted species is 100% at this
time_ Herbaceous ground cover is 100% except in the wetland creation area which is
approximately 40% right now.
5.1.2 Invasive vegetation
The enhanced buffer area was originally covered with blackberry. As a result, control of
blackberry on this site will need to be closely monitored. Blackberry maintenance has
been ongoing since the installation, and currently blackberry coverage (as well as all
other weedy species) is <5%. This meets the criteria required of not more than 10%
weedy species coverage.
5.1.3 Hydrology
The wetland creation areas had standing water in depths from F'4", clearly meeting the
wetland hydrology criteria. However, this is the winter season so a better reflection of
wetland hydrology will be the 2nd quarter monitoring which will take place in the spring
in the early part of the growing season.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSION
The site is meeting all of the monitoring requirements for Year 1.
The Year 1 2nd quarter monitoring is scheduled to take place in Late March, 2013 with a
report to the City to follow shortly_
9
0
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
January 11, 2013
Page 5 of 8
If you have any questions or need any additional information please contact me at (253)
859-0515 or by email at esewail@sewallwc.com.
Sincerely,
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
Ed Sewall
Senior Wetland Ecologist PWS 4212
Above: Looking north from center of mitigation site 1-3-13.
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
.January 11, 2013
Page 6 of 8
Above: Looking southeast along the southern end of the mitigation site 1-3-13,
! 0
Olympus Villa
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
January 11, 2013
Page 7 of 8
Above: Looking southeast acro,s-s wetland creation portion cif miligation site 1-3-13.
Olympus Villa
Sewall Weiland Consulting, Inc.
January 11, 2013
Page 8 of 8
Above: Looking northwest across wetland creation portion ref mitigation Nile 1-3-13.
Alnh
Denis Law 0
Mayor
City of
�
s S
Department of Community and Economic Development
December 2.8, 2012 C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator
Bruce Knowlton
CamWest Olympus Villa, LLC
9720 NE 120th. PI, Ste 100
Kirkland, WA 98034
Subject: Request for Status of Maintenance and Monitoring
Olympus Villa Mitigation
City of RentonF tUA10-0§T
Dear Mr. Knowlton:
City of Renton Municipal Code requires that maintenance and monitoring reports be
received quarterly for the first year and annually thereafter. The City has yet to receive
your 1St quarterly report due on October 24, 2012.
This letter serves as.notice that you have 30 days upon receipt of this letter to submit
the status of the mitigation project, or the matter will be turned over to the Code
Compliance Section.
Please submit this and all subsequent materials relating to the wetland mitigation
project to my attention. I can be reached at 425-430-7219 with any questions.
Sincerely,
l
Rocale Timmons
Associate Planner
cc: City of Renton File LUA10-090
Ed Sewall, Sewall Wetland Consulting
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
Donna Locher, Code Compliance Inspector
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 rentonwa.gov
Denis Law
Mayor city ofImW
�,'
Department of Community and Economic Development
July 24, 2012 C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator
Bruce Knowlton
CamWest Olympus Villa, LLC
9720 NE 12& PI, Ste 100
Kirkland, WA 98034
SUBJECT: Start of Monitoring and Receipt of Surety
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
City of Renton f ile, LUA-10-M
Dear Mr. Knowlton:
Monitoring and Maintenance Period Start Date: On July 24, 2012 the Certificate of
Installation. for the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat mitigation project, from Sewall Wetland
Consulting was received. Therefore, the date of this letter marks the beginning of your
minimum 5 -year maintenance and monitoring period. As a reminder, reports are due
quarterly for the first year and annually thereafter. Your first quarterly monitoring report is
due to the City on October 24, 2012. Please send three copies of the report to my
attention.
This letter is also confirming the City has received a surety device (cash) in the amount of
$19,375.00 to cover the cost of a minimum five years successful maintenance and
monitoring.
In order to assure the quickest possible release of your surety device, please ensure
prompt monitoring and maintenance are performed for the duration of your monitoring
period. If at any time during your minimum five-year monitoring period the mitigation
project falls below performance standards, the monitoring period will be placed on hold.
Once the mitigation project regains compliance with approved performance standards, the
maintenance and monitoring timeframe will restart for a period necessary to establish that
performance standards have been met.
I look forward to receiving your first quarterly maintenance and monitoring report, which
was due on October 24, 2092.
Sincerely,
CAL-
LIYt/i
Ro ale Timmons, Planner
Current Planning Division
cc: Carrie Olson, Engineering Specialist
Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc.
Yellow File
Renton City Mall . 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 . rentonwa.gov
PR<.R$FERENCE
IS�rJF}iJ�'TE
1911.70'44 b_ qOp
USD
APRIL 13, 2012
,a -
"Z'•(INSERT DAME AfiD TITLE) HEREBY CERTTFY THAT I AM A REPRESENTATIVE OF
CITY OF RENTON AUTHORIZED TO EXECUT F THIS STATEMENT AND 3DFM7AND PAYMENT
OF US$ (INSERT AMOUNT) UNDER PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION LETTER OF
CREDIT NO. 18117044-00-000 DATED APRIL 13, 2012_ I FURTHER CERTIFY TTn;T
THE AMOUNT OF THIS DRAWING, REPRESENTS F"U"NDS DUE US AS SPIE HIVE BEEN
NOT'IFI'ED THAT PNC BP -NK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION HAS ELECTED NOT TO FURTHER
Page 1 of 2 18117044-D0-000
Page 2 of 2 18117044- CQ- OQQ
0 0
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITYr city -of
� ®R-'?"
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT t ®�
M E M Q R A N D U M
DATE: July 24, 2012
TO: Carrie Olson
FROM: Rocale Timmons
SUBJECT: Release of Assignment of Funds
Olympus Villa Mitigation Installation
City of Renton LUA10-090
Carrie,
Please initiate the paperwork to release, the assignment of funds for the installation of
the mitigation project for the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat. The amount is for
$13,594.98. The release applies to the wetland mitigation installation.
A copy of the paperwork should also go in the yellow file and to the City Clerk's office.
Thank you!
h:\ced\planning\current planningNwetlands\olympus villa install assignment of funds - release.doc
A'
.
�
t
ons-.'�
r�n�rn��o��Q�
'.��'
= r: t9 n n c° 0 7 n
n c is Q�cso [r]o,: r- c ro n
••
n- p C -0
N
o'CRto n SmO-G
O
,�.6
S'4Ej
gIT,ft
rD �31 CD
-s¢
'a
o
po c G
�v O
y
Pt
��
�.v
00 r-
R
=.� Q ✓ �� C
cr
O
�'
c�
ren
,•
^' O � .cr
c
CDn�
C o n
a
=
a
crRA>ID
00
CD
Q.SID
=rOp
r* R
CD 10
-1
n
ca
n•
/ O C
4
Q
CD
ao�
x
4;-1Cr
yy
2.
CD
O R CD
oil
qQd
cD
CD x
a�
a
o• � c a
m
n°
¢ p ern =r
A'
.
�
t
t
'.��'
= r: t9 n n c° 0 7 n
n c is Q�cso [r]o,: r- c ro n
••
n- p C -0
N
o'CRto n SmO-G
O
,�.6
S'4Ej
gIT,ft
70
C ?'wy [C
C T•' rtet �'
t74 W
A .�'+ tic N cSa
•
April 25, 2011
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF KING
0
BONNIE I. WALTON, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes
and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington,
over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter.
That on the 25th day of April, 2011, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. your affiant duly mailed and placed
in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all
parties of record the Hearing Examiner's Decision for the Olympus Villa Preliminary Subdivision
(LUA-10-090 ECF, PP).
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 25th day of April, 2011.
4►�� f .'R"�Q
,q
Cynt 'a R.
M0027-
Notary
oy2' Notary Public in and for the State of '�,;•..""'"'`i+iy�
Washington, residing in Renton �,fEzfr�i
My Commission expires: 8/27/2014
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner
13607 461st Avenue SE
North Bend, WA 98045
Pastor David Shenk
Awesome Yah Church,
Church of Yah in Christ
702 Nile Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
Ken Bouvier
721 Rosario Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
9918;'9915;. ��a,t� KAr alglaedwoJ u<u !q x LULU cL;ULM; ap 9�;nnb!t�
09[ 9,109 L9� Fja1v gtlr�. apindL�joa 815 Z x :,1 anis Iagel .
41ill Finkbeiner
Finkbeiner Development Raymond Woo
12011 Bel -Red Road #206 14404 SE 87th Street
Bellevue, WA 98005 Newcastle, WA 98059
Dinah Prather
709 Rosario Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Jarrod Faehnrich
751 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
Robert Johnseine
9805 NE 116th Street #7499
Kirkland, WA 98034
Kerry & 5hana Curran
715 Rosario Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
label size 1" x 2 5?8" compatible vaith Avery '5160'8160
' Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery �','5160!8160
Karen Walter
Jon Newman
Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader
Mina Fletcher
8070 Langston Road S
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Div.
667 Rosario Place NE
Seattle, WA 98178
39015 172nd Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
Auburn, WA 98092
Dion Coleman
Michael Krohn
Kevin Van Flandern
5821 NE 8th Street
457 Pasco Place NE
600 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
John Nelson
Merrick McGinnis
Peggy & George Bukota
12865 47th Place
5915 NE 4th Place
S77 Rosario Avenue NE
Bellevue, WA 98006
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059-4553
Martin Paquette, PLS
Brian Baggett
Carlos Lopez
Renton Technical College
511 Pasco Place NE
523 Pasco Place NE
3000 NE 4th Street
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98056
Russ Gawler
George A. Sabol
Vyacheslav Rebrik
517 Pasco Place NE
528 Pasco Place NE
567 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Judy Zaccaria
Elvina Tong
Allison Feely
579 Pasco Place NE
603 Pasco Place NE
615 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Kim Racine
Mythu Chiem
Turen Pang
653 Pasco Place NE
665 Pasco Place NE
5914 NE 7th Street
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
label size 1" x 2 5?8" compatible vaith Avery '5160'8160
' Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery �','5160!8160
Beng Cabrera Hyung J. Palk
Avenue NE 508 Rosario Avenue NE 480 Rosario Avenue NE
98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059
label size 1" x 2 5.B" compatible with Avery'�'5160i8160
Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0'5160/8160
i=.S37dVLS
2lq;IAL ) LULU /9 X 'LIJU CZ L UJJBJ 9p
I�
09�8,091�-: Faa,hya�r:algl.admo� _.8r'� Z x .: e'i`
=ws
Valerie Harris
Brandon Lee
h Street
658 Pasco Place NE
618 Pasco Place NE
A 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Mary Ann Ferreira
Wayne Messere
'lace NE
556 Pasco Place NE
522 Pasco Place NE
4 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Ricky Canlez
Jill Wirick
'lace NE
510 Pasco Place NE
5921 NE 4th Place
a 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Mary D'Ettore
Melissa Bouthillier
h Place
6013 NE 4th Place
463 Pasco Place NE
a 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
den
Michael Le
Kate Bressan
Avenue NE
518 Quincy Avenue NE
564 Quincy Avenue NE
k 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
i Beth Josef
Linda Gallup
Daren Kobata
Avenue NE
614 Quincy Avenue NE
625 Quincy Avenue NE
1 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
ialanta
Joe Mendoza
Louise Chan
Avenue NE
568 Pasco Place NE
671 Pasco Place NE
k 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
en
Jaynes Hoo
Cheryl Takano
Avneue NE
605 Rosario Avenue NE
617 Rosario Avenue NE
s 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
ck
Anh V. Nguyen
Robert Hansen
Avenue NE
566 Rosario Avenue NE
526 Rosario Avenue NE
98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Beng Cabrera Hyung J. Palk
Avenue NE 508 Rosario Avenue NE 480 Rosario Avenue NE
98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059
label size 1" x 2 5.B" compatible with Avery'�'5160i8160
Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0'5160/8160
i=.S37dVLS
Dale Miller
462 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
Jennifer Mazurkiewicz
572 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
Loc Huynh
630 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
Jay Coleman
655 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
09[a,'0919C. AJ'K' Dane aig!iedwoD ww Z9 x wUJ 9d J�'Uoi ep aprbj
09121D9 G9.,, fAny ip;,,; a;q aedwoo „819 Z x :.l anis lagUl
Grace Wu Dora Kwong
450 Rosario Avenue NE 5819 NE 6th Street
Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059
Phong La
5715 NE 6th Street
Renton, WA 98059
Todd Taylor
637 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
Xiaofei Shi
661 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
Shelley Carlin
612 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
Tom Beardslee
647 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
label size I" x 2 518" compatible with Avery x"516018160
Etiquette de format 25 rnm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery `5160'8160
•
From:
John E. Galt Uegalt@frontier.com]
Sent:
Friday, April 22, 2011 10:10 AM
To:
Stacy Tucker; Rocale Timmons
Cc:
Jennifer T. Henning; Bonnie Walton
Subject:
Olympus Villa Decision attached
Attachments:
LUA10-090.doc
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Flagged
Stacy and Rocale,
•
My decision is attached; I will put a signed original in today's outgoing mail addressed to Stacy.
My other jurisdictions use the electronic version to make copies to distribute to parties of record. (That saves time as they
don't have to wait for the signed version to arrive before issuing the decision/recommendation.) I suggest that system be
used here.
Have a good weekend,
John E. Galt
Hearing Examiner/Officer
Mediator
Voice/FAX: (425) 259-3144
HEARING EXAMINER'S
DECISION (April 22, 2011)
f A
T
'ITY OF RENTON
PR 2 5 2011
1 DECEIVED
CITY CLERICS OFFICE
BEFORE the HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore for the
CITY of RENTON
FILE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
OWNERS:
TYPE OF CASE:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
SUMMARY OF DECISION:
DATE OF DECISION:
DECISION
LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Finkbeiner Development
ATTN: Bill Finkbeiner
12011 Bel -Red. Road, Suite 206
Bellevue, WA 98005
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner
13607 461" Avenue SE
North Bend, WA 95045
Preliminary subdivision (Olympus Villa)
Approve subject to conditions
GRANT subject to conditions (revised)
April 22, 2011
INTRODUCTION'
Finkbeiner Development (Finkbeiner) seeks preliminary approval of Olympus Villa, an 11 lot single family
residential subdivision of a 6.72 acre site zoned R-4.
Finkbeiner filed the preliminary subdivision application on December 22, 2010. (Exhibit 11 Z) The Renton
Department of Community and Economic Development, Planning Division (Planning) deemed the
application to be complete on January 7, 2011. (Testimony)
Any statement in this section deemed to be either a Finding of Fact or a Conclusion of Law is hereby adopted as such.
Exhibit citations are provided for the reader's benefit and indicate: 1) The source of a quote or specific fact; and/or 2)
The major document(s) upon which a stated fact is based. While the Examiner considers all relevant documents in the
record, typically only major documents are cited. The Examiner's Decision is based upon all documents in the record.
cAcxamlrentonld=\Iua 10-090.doe
N
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 2 of 15
The subject property is located at 12XXX Nile Avenue NE (aka 148'h Avenue SE), approximately 800 feet
north of NE 6th Street (aka SE 124`h Street).
The Renton Hearing Examiner Pro Tempore (Examiner) viewed the subject property on April 19, 2011.
The Examiner held an open record hearing on April 19, 2011. Planning gave notice of the hearing as
required by the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). (Exhibit 14)
The following exhibits were entered into the hearing record during the hearing:
Exhibits 1 - 12: As enumerated in Exhibit 1, the Staff Report
Exhibit 13: Applicant -requested condition changes
Exhibit 14: Hearing notice documentation
The Examiner held the hearing record open for up to two days at the request of Finkbeiner and Planning for
receipt of a water availability letter and for entry of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Report.
The following documents were entered pursuant to that authority:
Exhibit 15: Water District 90 water availability letter
Exhibit lb: Environmental Review Committee Report
The record closed on April 20, 2011, with receipt of Exhibit 15.
The action taken herein and the requirements, limitations and/or conditions imposed by this decision are, to
the best of the Examiner's knowledge or belief, only such as are lawful and within the authority of the
Examiner to take pursuant to applicable law and policy.
ISSUES
Does the application meet the criteria for preliminary subdivision approval as established within the RMC?
Should the subdivision's internal street system include a northerly extension of Pasco Place NE?
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The subject property is essentially a "flag" lot which has 54.42 feet of frontage on the east side of
Nile Avenue NE and which extends some 1,290 feet to the east, eventually widening to
approximately 315 feet. (Exhibit 3) The property is presently vacant, although the remains of a
building, presumed to be a former residence which was demolished at an unknown time in the past,
are located on the western portion of the site. (Exhibit 5 and testimony)
cA,-xamlrentonldocs\1 tat0-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 3 of 15
2. A variety of land uses abut the subject property.
A. The western "notch" on the south side of the subject property created by the 157 foot
southerly "jog" in the south property line is occupied by an approximate 2.3 acre parcel (the
Shenk parcel). The Shenk parcel contains a single-family residence near its Nile Avenue NE
frontage. (Exhibits 1, 5, and 12C and testimony)
B. The east half of the south property line abuts the north edge of the developed Windwood
single-family residential subdivision. One of the streets in Windwood, Pasco Place NE,
terminates against the common property line with the subject property. Pasco Place NE
extends southerly through Windwood to eventually provide a connection to NE 4' Street (aka
SE 128th Street). Windwood is a development of some 100± homes. (Exhibits 2, 3, and 5)
Windwood was developed under King County regulations. (Testimony)
C. The east property line abuts the rear lot line of six lots in Maureen Highlands, another 100 ±
lot single-family residential subdivision developed under King County regulations.
Windwood and Maureen Highlands are interconnected via NE 6`h Street which extends
westerly to Nile Avenue NE. (Exhibits 2, 3, and 5 and testimony)
D. The north property line abuts all or a portion of seven acreage lots, most of which access SE
120th Street a short distance to the north. One of those lots (the Newman property) is larger
than the rest and is undeveloped; the rest appear to each contain a single-family residence.
(Exhibits 2 and 5 and testimony)
3. The subject property is essentially flat with a very gentle downward slope from east to west. (Exhibit
3) Two regulated wetlands are found on the property: A small Category 3, disturbed wetland near the
west end of the site, and a significantly larger, forested, Category 2 wetland located just east of the
Pasco Place NE right-of-way alignment (extended). (Exhibits 3 and 7) Vegetation consists of a mix
of shrubs, groundcover, and 95 trees. (Exhibits 1 and 5) The subject property is not located in the
Aquifer Protection Zone. (Exhibit 1, p. 3)
4. Finkbeiner proposes to subdivide the subject property into 11 lots for single-family residential
development, two open space tracts (Tracts A and C) totaling 87,966 square feet (SF), a 15,837 SF
stormwater control tract (Tract B), and a 62,705 SF tract for future development (Tract D). (Exhibit
3) Finkbeiner has no plans to develop Tract D. (Testimony) Tract D is effectively isolated by the
Category 2 wetland on Tract A from the rest of the subject property and can realistically be accessed
only from the north. For all intents and purposes, Tract D most likely cannot be developed until the
acreage lot to its north is further developed.
The proposed lots will be served by two public streets: An east -west street (proposed NE 7`h Place)
extending from Nile Avenue NE to an extension of Pasco Place NE through the property. Proposed
cA cxamVentonldocslkua10-090.doe
HEARING EXAMINER Fro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 4 of 15
NE 7th Place will be developed as a "half -street" section, allowing for future widening to a full -width
section at such time as the Shenk property develops. (Exhibit 3)
Finkbeiner proposes to use the "clustering" provisions of the RMC for some of the proposed lots. As
depicted on Exhibit 3, Proposed Lots 1 — 5 take advantage of those provisions. Finkbeiner asked at
hearing to be allowed to include Proposed Lots 6 and 7 in the clustering calculations. (Exhibits 1 and
3 and testimony)
The density of Olympus Villa as proposed will be 2.6 dwelling units per net acre. (Exhibit 1)
The subdivi sion design and all of the proposed lots comply with RMC zoning, street, street network,
parks, blocks, and lot configuration requirements. All of the proposed single-family residential lots
access a public street. (Exhibits 1 and 3)
6. The record contains evidence that appropriate provisions have been made or can be made for:
A. Open space. Small lot clusters of up to a maximum of fifty lots are allowed within the R-4
zone when at least 30 % of the site is permanently set aside as "significant open space." Such
open space must be situated to act as a visual buffer between small lot clusters and other
development in the zone. The area of Tract A comes up a little shy of the 30% set aside
requirement (87,618 SF 1293,152 SF = 29.88%). While Tract D will not be immediately
developed, it is not proposed to be set aside as permanent open space and, therefore, cannot
count towards the open space requirement. Tract C (348 SF) is also to be dedicated as open
space. However, Tract C is not located in an area which would serve as a visual buffer
between the small lot cluster and other development in the area. (Exhibit 1)
Finkbeiner testified that be could easily adjust the common boundary between Tracts A and
D to provide the necessary increase in the area of Tract A. (Testimony)
B. Drainage ways. All stormwater runoff except that from Proposed Lot 1 will be collected and
transported to a detention pond on Tract B from which it will flow into the drainage system
along Nile Avenue NE. (Exhibit 6) The pond will replace the wetland now located there.
Mitigation for the loss of that wetland is proposed in the area of the wetland in Tract A.
(Exhibit 7)
Stormwater runoff from Proposed Lot i will be dispersed into the wetland to its north and
east. (Exhibit 6)
C. Streets and roads. The proposed streets and street system meet City standards. (Exhibit 1)
c AexamVentoMdocsllua 10-090. doe
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 5 of 15
D. Alleys. Proposed Lots 2 & 3 and 4 & 5 will be served by two private easements which will
function as alleys, allowing access to those lots from the rear of the lots. (Exhibit 3 and
testimony)
E. Other public ways. No need for other public ways within the subdivision exists. (Exhibits 1
and 3)
F. Potable water supply. The subject property lies within Water District 90 which has confirmed
the availability of an adequate supply of potable water. (Exhibit 15)
G. Sanitary wastes. An 8" sanitary sewer main exists beneath Pasco Place NE. (Exhibit 1)
H. Parks and recreation. The project has been required through the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) threshold determination process (See Finding of Fact 7, below.) to make a park
impact mitigation payment. (Exhibit 16)
7. Renton`s SEPA Responsible Official, the ERC, issued a Determination of Nonsignificance -Mitigated
(DNS -M) on January 31, 2011. (Exhibit 8) The DNS -M was not appealed. (Exhibit 1) The DNS -M
is based on three mitigation measures: Payment of a parks and recreation impact fee, a transportation
impact fee, and a fire impact fee. (Exhibit 16) The three mitigation measures have been carried
forward by Planning as a recommended condition of approval. (Exhibit 1, p. 11, Recommended
Condition 1)
8. Most residents of Windwood have no objection to subdivision of the land to their north nor to the
proposed design with but one important exception: They are strongly opposed to the extension of and
use of Pasco Place NE. Windwood residents have experienced many problems with speeding drivers,
especially since the development of Maureen Highlands which resulted in the opening up of 6th
Street NE through the neighborhood. Stop signs have been installed, but some motorists ignore them.
The Windwood residents believe that the extension of Pasco Place NE will only make the situation
worse. They see no reason why their neighborhood needs to be connected to the Olympus Villa
neighborhood. (Exhibits 12A and 12D and testimony)
The RMC requires that all new development establish and further an interconnecting grid system.
The code allows for exceptions to the grid street requirement in only two situations: Where
interconnection is infeasible due to topography; or where interconnection is infeasible due to existing
substantial improvements. [RMC 4-7-150, exceptions listed in 4-7-150E3] Neither condition that
would justify an exception is present in this case: No topographical problems exist and no
improvements would block the extension. (Exhibit 3)
9. One of the abutting owners in Maureen Highlands wants the easterly 60 feet of Tract D set aside as
open space to protect three deer and a fawn who reportedly live in the area. (Exhibit 12B) Another
c:lexamVentonldocs%1ua I 0-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 6 of 15
Maureen Highlands resident is concerned that the development not increase stormwater flows
towards the east and would prefer fewer, larger lots. (Exhibit 12E)
10. Newman, the owner of one of the lots to the north, would like to see the Pasco Place NE extension
curve more to the east than is proposed. He notes that, as designed, the right-of-way will stub out just
to the west of the common boundary between his property and the property of his neighbor to the
east. He would like the right-of-way stub to be centered on their common boundary, so that further
extension to the north through their properties would encumber each equally. (Testimony)
The alignment of the Pasco Place NE extension right-of-way cannot shift measurably to the east
within the subject property due to the location of the Category 2 wetland and its required buffer.
(Exhibit 3 and testimony) In order to make the adjustment Newman seeks, a reverse curve would
have to occur just to the north of the subject property.
Street alignment within subdivisions must comply with standards set by RMC 4-6-060. [RMC 4-7-
150D] A deflection angle of 10° or more must occur through a horizontal "curve of reasonably long
radius". Further, wherever a reverse curve is to occur (an "S" curve or a chicane), there must be a
"tangent section" (a straight segment between the curves) of not less than 100 feet for residential
access streets. [RMC 4-6-060F7a and F7c] Given that Newman's parcel has a north -south dimension
of approximately 250 feet (measured from Exhibit 2), the required curves and tangent section would
take most of the depth of his parcel to complete.
11. Shenk submitted a comment letter and testified at the hearing. The letter lists a number of concerns
resulting from misunderstanding some of the notations on the proposed preliminary plat. (Exhibit
12C) Shenk did not mention those concerns in his testimony.
Shenk wonders why Finkbeiner will not be required to install sewer stub -outs towards the south
when he installs the sewer beneath future NE 7d' Place. He suggests that installing them when the
sewer main is initially laid would eliminate the need to tear up the street later when his property
develops. (Testimony)
Staff responded that a major problem with such an idea is that no one can know where the stub -outs
might be needed on his side of the street until a development proposal for his property is put forth.
(Testimony)
12. Planning performed a comprehensive, detailed, thorough analysis of the proposal's conformance
with applicable requirements of the RMC. Planning concludes that the proposal complies, or can be
conditioned to comply, with all applicable requirements. (Exhibit 1)
13. Planning recommends approval of the proposed subdivision subject to 10 conditions. (Exhibit 1, pp.
11 and 12) Finkbeiner asks for revision to four of the recommended conditions:
cAexwnVenton%dacs%1ua i 0-090.doc;
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP (flympus [villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 7 of 15
A_ Recommended Condition 3: Finkbeiner wants to be able to include Proposed Lots 6 and 7 in
the clustering process. Finkbeiner wants to gain increased flexibility so that Proposed Lots 4
and 5 might be slightly enlarged.. (Exhibit 13) Planning supports that requested change.
(Testimony)
B. Recommended Condition 4: While Finkbeiner agrees that Proposed Lots 2 — 5 should access
from NE 7t' Place, he does not like the language which would limit that access to the
easements as depicted on Exhibit 3. He wants the flexibility to alter their alignment. (Exhibit
13) Planning has no objection to providing some flexibility, but wants to limit the number of
curb cuts and prohibit direct access onto Pasco Place NE. (Testimony) The RMC effectively
requires alley access in residential cluster designs. [RMC 4-7-150E5e]
C. Recommended Condition 6: This condition requires 1" water meters to serve Proposed Lots
6 — 11. That condition is based on the fact that, as presently designed, houses built on those
lots would have to be equipped with fire suppression sprinkler systems (because of the width
of the half -street section) which in turn require a larger -than -normal water meter. Finkbeiner
wants the flexibility to adjust the plat (slightly widening the half -street right-of-way) such
that those lots would not need to be sprinklered. (Exhibit 13 and testimony) Staff testified
that the Fire Marshal determines which lots must he sprinklered just before final construction
plans are approved. Staff now believes that Recommended Condition 6 should have been
provided as an advisory note rather than as a recommended condition of approval.
(Testimony)
D. Recommended Condition 8: Finkbeiner would like the flexibility to have the open space
tracts owned in common by a homeowners association instead of owned in common by the
lot owners abutting the tracts. (Exhibit 13) Planning supports that requested change.
(Testimony)
14. Any Conclusion of Law deemed to be a Finding of Fact is hereby adopted as such.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK 3
The Examiner is legally required to decide this case within the framework created by the following
principles:
Authori
A preliminary subdivision is a Type III application which is subject to an open record hearing before the
Examiner. The Examiner makes a .final decision on the application which is subject to the right of
reconsideration and appeal to the City Council. [RMC 4-08-070H1j, 4-8-080G, and 4-8-100G4]
Any statement in this section deemed to be either a Finding of Fact or a Conclusion of Law is hereby adopted as such.
caexam\mntonldocsllua 10-090.doc
HEADING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RF_.: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 2212011
Page 8 of 15
The Examiner may
grant or deny the application, or the Examiner may require of the applicant such conditions,
modifications and restrictions as the Examiner finds necessary to make the application
compatible with its environment and carry out the objectives and goals of the Comprehensive
Plan, the zoning regulations, the subdivision regulations, the codes and ordinances of the
City of Renton .... Conditions, modifications and restrictions which may be imposed are, but
are not limited to, additional setbacks, screenings in the form of landscaping and fencing,
covenants, easements and dedications of additional road rights-of-way. Performance bonds
may be required to insure compliance with the conditions, modifications and restrictions.
[RMC 4-8-100G31
Review Criteria
The review criteria for preliminary subdivisions are set forth at RMC 4-7-080B:
B. PRINCIPLES OF ACCEPTABILITY:
A subdivision shall be consistent with the following principles of acceptability:
1. Legal Lots: Create legal building sites which comply with all provisions of the City
Zoning Code.
2. Access: Establish access to a public road for each segregated parcel.
3. Physical Characteristics: Have suitable physical characteristics. A proposed plat may
be denied because of flood, inundation, or wetland conditions. Construction of protective
improvements may be required as a condition of approval, and such improvements shall be
noted on the final plat.
4. Drainage: Make adequate provision for drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public
ways, water supplies and sanitary wastes.
(Bold headings in original) Requirements and standards for street and trail networks, parks and open space,
streets, residential blocks, and lot configuration are set forth in RMC 4-7-120 and -140 -- 170.
The Local Project Review Act [Chapter 36.70B RCW] establishes a mandatory "consistency" review for
"project permits", a term defined by the Act to include "building permits, subdivisions, binding site plans,
planned unit developments, conditional uses, shoreline substantial development permits, site plan review,
permits or approvals required by critical area ordinances, site-specific rezones authorized by a
comprehensive plan or subarea plan". [RCW 36.70B.020(4)]
(1) Fundamental land use planning choices made in adopted comprehensive plans and
development regulations shall serve as the foundation for project review. The review of a
proposed project's consistency with applicable development regulations or, in the absence of
applicable regulations the adopted comprehensive plan, under RCW 36.70B.040 shall
incorporate the determinations under this section.
c: cxamVentonldocs\1uaIM90.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 9 of 15
(2) During project review, a local government or any subsequent reviewing body shall
determine whether the items listed in this subsection are defined in the development
regulations applicable to the proposed project or, in the absence of applicable regulations the
adopted comprehensive plan. At a minimum, such applicable regulations or plans shall be
determinative of the:
(a) Type of land use permitted at the site, including uses that may be allowed
under certain circumstances, such as planned unit developments and conditional and
special uses, if the criteria for their approval have been satisfied;
(b) Density of residential development in urban growth areas; and
(c) Availability and adequacy of public facilities identified in the comprehensive
plan, if the plan or development regulations provide for funding of these facilities as
required by [the Growth Management Act].
[RCW 36.70B.030]
Vested Rights
Renton has not enacted a general vested rights provision. Therefore, applicable provisions of state law
govern:
Subdivision and short subdivision applications are governed by a statutory vesting rule: such
applications "shall be considered under the subdivision or short subdivision ordinance, and
zoning or other land use control ordinances, in effect on the land at the time a fully
completed application... has been submitted ...."
[RCW 58.17.033; see also SMC 16.28.4801 Therefore, this preliminary subdivision application is vested to
the regulations as they existed on January 7, 2011.
Standard of Review
The standard of review is preponderance of the evidence. The applicant has the burden of proof.
Scope of Consideration
The Examiner has considered: all of the evidence and testimony; applicable adopted laws, ordinances, plans,
and policies; and the pleadings, positions, and arguments of the parties of record.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates compliance with the preliminary subdivision
approval criteria in RMC 4-7-080B 1: All of the proposed lots will comply with zoning regulations.
cAexamVentonldocsVua 10-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 10 of 15
2. The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates compliance with the preliminary subdivision
approval criteria in RMC 4-7-080B2: Each lot will have access to a public street.
3. The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates compliance with the preliminary subdivision
approval criteria in RMC 4-7-08OB3: The major on-site critical area is to be protected; mitigation in
conformance with adopted standards is proposed for the loss of the lesser critical area.
4. The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates compliance with the preliminary subdivision
approval criteria in RMC 4-7-080134: The streets and drainage systems have been designed to
comply with City codes and standards. A minor shortfall in open space can be easily fixed by an
appropriate condition.. Adequate utility services are available.
5. The preceding four Conclusions of Law show that Olympus Villa complies with all established
criteria for approval. However, they likely don't answer some of the neighbors' concerns. The next
Conclusions of Law will address their concerns.
6. The Windwood design obviously contemplated the eventual extension of Pasco Place NE to serve
subdivision of the acreage parcels to the north, of which the subject property is one. Whether the
home purchasers clearly understood that or not, that is the reality presented by a street which stubs
out to an adjoining undeveloped parcel. Olympus Villa's design is simply bringing that expectation to
fruition.
Renton has strong requirements for interconnection of streets between and among adjoining
developments. Just because King County did not have interconnection requirements is no reason to
not implement and enforce the City's requirements. The interconnection of Pasco Place NE with
proposed NE 7'h Place will provide a second access into not only Olympus Villa, but also the north
end of Windwood: If an accident were to block the Pasco Place NE/NE 6th Street intersection now,
emergency vehicles could not reach any of the homes on Pasco Place NE north of NE 6th Street. The
interconnection will provide an alternate access. And as one of the witnesses acknowledged, many if
not most of the speeders are neighborhood residents, not outsiders cutting through the neighborhood.
The neighbors and the City have a range of actions that can be taken to solve the speeding problem
short of ignoring adopted requirements for interconnection of streets.
7. The RMC provides no basis upon which one could require that the eastern 60 feet of Tract D be set
aside permanently as open space. Wildlife presently living on the portions of the site which will be
converted into streets and house lots will, most likely, be lost. That loss is a direct result of the
legislative decision to urbanize this area. Urbanization is, generally speaking, incompatible with
most wildlife species habitat, especially for animals such as deer, bear, coyote, etc. The legislative
decision to designate and zone the area for urbanization amounts to a conscious choice of human
habitat over wildlife habitat. That legislative choice is not debatable in the context of this (or any
other quasi-judicial) application.
c: lexamVcnton%docs%1un I0-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 11 of 15
As to the drainage concern of the other Maureen Highlands resident, the evidence indicates that the
vast majority of the stormwater runoff will be directed towards the west and Nile Avenue NE, not
towards Maureen Highlands on the east. There would seem to be virtually no chance that the small
amount of runoff from the residence on Proposed Lot 1 could ever affect Maureen Highlands given
the size of Tract A with its wetland and intervening Tract D. Control of stormwater runoff from any
future development of Tract D will have to be addressed at the time a proposal for such development
is put forward.
S. Were it not for the existence of the substantial Category 2 wetland just to the east of the Pasco Place
NE right-of-way (extended), Newman's request would likely have garnered the support of both
Finkbeiner and staff. But the wetland's location is a physical reality with which we all must live. City
policy and regulation strongly support protection of such wetlands. The street must avoid the wetland
to the greatest extent possible.
The unfortunate reality is that most of any right-of-way alignment adjustment will have to occur on
the property(ies) to the north. It may be possible to begin a slight horizontal curve to the east near the
north property line without impinging on the wetland or its required buffer. (Minor revisions to
approved preliminary plats are allowed. [RMC 4-7-080M]) Newman and his neighbor may want to
discuss the pros and cons of such an alignment shift with Finkbeiner and City staff before
construction plans are prepared.
This situation does not warrant a delay in approval or redesign of the proposed preliminary plat.
9. Requiring sewer stubs to both sides of a new street makes sense, but only if both sides of the street
are being developed at the same time. No one can say when, if ever, the Shenk property may
develop. No one can say what the land development requirements may be when the Shenk property
is proposed for development. Therefore, no one can say with any certainty exactly where sewer stubs
would be required. Installing sewer stubs based on a hypothetical development would make no sense
— even if it were legally defensible, which it likely isn't.
10. Olympus Villa passes the "consistency" test: Single-family residential is the primary use in the R-4
zone; the proposed density is within the range allowed by applicable zoning; and adequate utility
services are available to the site.
11. The recommended conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit 1 are reasonable, supported by the
evidence, and capable of accomplishment with the following changes:
A. A preliminary subdivision embodies the concept of approval of a specific development
proposal. A preliminary subdivision evaluation is based upon the specific preliminary plat
submitted by the applicant. It is appropriate, therefore, that the conditions of approval clearly
identify the plat which is being approved. The Planning recommendation as drafted does not
do so. Exhibit 3 constitutes the plat proposal which has been reviewed in this hearing process
cN-xamlrentonldocsUua i "90.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RF: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP Olympus Villa)
April 22, 20 t 1
Page 12 of 15
and which should be approved. The Examiner will add a condition to specify that Exhibit 3 is
the approved preliminary plat; numbering of the subsequent conditions will be incremented
accordingly.
B. Recommended Conditions 3 and 8: The Examiner will revise those two conditions as
requested by Finkbeiner and as supported by Planning.
C. Recommended Condition 4: Both Finkbeiner and Planning made good points regarding the
wording of this condition. The Examiner will incorporate both points of view in revised
wording for this condition.
D. Recommended Condition 6: The Examiner will eliminate this condition. The preliminary
subdivision approval stage is way too early in the process to be specifying for all time the
size of water meters for specific lots. Authority exists under the International Fire Code to
address the concern that led to this condition.
E. Planning stated in the Staff Report that it was going to recommend placement of a note on
the face of the final plat requiring that the houses on Proposed Lots 1 — 5 must be oriented
towards Pasco place NE. (Exhibit 1, p. 9) That condition never made it into the list of
recommended conditions. (Exhibit 1, pp. 11 and 12) Finkbeiner objects to such a limitation
as pertains to Proposed Lots 3 and 4. (Testimony)
Minimum corner lot width and depth requirements for R-4 zoned land in a small lot cluster
development are 60 feet and 65 feet, respectively. fRMC 4-2-110A] Proposed Lot 3 can meet
those requirements for either orientation, but Proposed Lot 4 works only if its Pasco Place
NE frontage is considered its front lot line. Proposed Lots 1, 2, 4, and 5 must front on Pasco
Place NE. A desirable streetscape requires that Proposed Lot 3 do likewise. The Examiner
will impose Planning's suggested condition.
F. The Examiner prefers to not use the word "applicant" in conditions. Land use entitlement
approvals, of which a preliminary subdivision approval is one type, "run with the land."
Simply put, that means the permit is still valid no matter how many times ownership of the
property may change. While it may be hyper -technical, some might argue that only the party
which sought preliminary subdivision approval was the "applicant," that any successor in
interest was something other than the "applicant," and that, therefore, any such successor was
not obligated to comply with conditions addressed to the "applicant." To avoid any such
argument in the future, the Examiner prefers to use the word "plattor," meaning the party
subdividing (platting) the property. The Examiner will make that substitution throughout the
conditions.
c:lcxamlren1oMdocs\1ua 10-090. doe
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 13 of 15
G. A few minor, non -substantive structure, grammar, and/or punctuation revisions to
Recommended Conditions 1, 3, and 8 will improve parallel construction, clarity, and flow
within the conditions. Such changes will be made.
12. Any Finding of Fact deemed to be a Conclusion of Law is hereby adopted as such.
F13 R01 10 1W'
Based upon the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the testimony and evidence submitted at
the open record hearing, and the Examiner's site view, the Examiner GRANTS preliminary subdivision
approval for Olympus Valla SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS.
Decision issued April 22, 2011.
ohn E. G t
Hearing Examiner Pro Tempore
HEARING PARTICIPANTS 4
Rocale Timmons Bill Finkbeiner
Kevin Van Flanderen John Newman
David Shenk Ken Bouvier
Kayren Kittrick
NOTICE of RIGHT of RECONSIDERATION
"Any interested person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on an erroneous procedure, errors
of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior hearing may" file a request/motion for reconsideration with "the Examiner within fourteen (14)
days after the written decision of the Examiner has been rendered. The [request/motion for reconsideration]
shall set forth the specific errors relied upon." [RMC 4-8-100G4] Any request/motion for reconsideration
shall be addressed to the Renton Hearing Examiner and filed with the City Clerk. See RMC 4-8-100G4 and
RMC 4-8-110E8 for additional information and requirements regarding reconsideration.
4 The official Parties of Record register is maintained by the City's Hearing Clerk.
0&xam%mntonldocsUuai0-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 14 of 15
NOTICE of RIGHT of APPEAL
This Decision becomes final and conclusive as of the fifteenth calendar day after the date of issuance of the
Decision unless reconsideration is timely requested. If reconsideration is timely requested, the Examiner's
order granting or denying reconsideration becomes the final and conclusive decision for the City. The
Examiner's final decision is subject to the right of the applicant, City, or a party of record with standing, as
provided in RMC 4-8-11OF1, to file an appeal with the City Council in accordance with the procedures of
RMC 4-8-11 OF. Any appeal trust be filed within 14 days following the issuance of the final decision. See
RMC 4-8-110E9 and RMC 4-8-11 OF for additional information and requirements regarding appeals to the
City Council.
The following statement is provided pursuant to RCW 36.70B. 130: "Affected property owners may request
a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation."
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Olympus Villa
LUA10-090, ECF, PP
This Preliminary Subdivision is subject to compliance with all applicable provisions, requirements, and
standards of the Renton Municipal Code, standards adopted pursuant thereto, and the following special
conditions:
Exhibit 3 is the approved preliminary plat. Revisions to approved preliminary subdivisions/plats are
regulated by RMC 4-7-080M.
2. The plattor shall comply with the three mitigation measures issued as part of the Determination of
Nonsignificance -Mitigated, dated February 4, 2011. (Exhibits 8 and lb)
3. The plattor shall be required to place additional area within Tract A in order to comply with the 30%
permanent open space requirement for clustering. The permanent open space easement shall be
recorded prior to or concurrently with the Final Plat.
4. The plattor shall place on the face of the plat a covenant noting the setbacks of the R-8 zoning
designation apply on the clustered lots (Proposed Lots 1-7) only. The covenant shall be recorded
concurrently with the Final Plat.
5. A note shall be placed on the face of the plat requiring Proposed Lots 2-5 to take vehicular access
from NE 7`t' Place and requiring Proposed Lots 2 & 3 to share a common curb cut and Proposed Lots
4 & 5 to share a common curb cut unless compelling evidence is presented prior to construction
c:lexamVentonldocsVua! 0-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 201 1
Page 15 of 15
permit approval to show that shared curb cuts are not feasible. The note shall be recorded
concurrently with the Final Plat.
6. The plattor shall be required to revise the drainage report (Exhibit 6) to include conceptual sizing
calculations for the detention pond and address the individual lot treatments. The revised plan shall
be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Plan Reviewer prior to construction permit
approval.
7. The plattor shall establish and record a permanent and irrevocable easement on the property title of
the tract containing the critical area and its buffer prior to Final Plat recording. The protective
easement shall be held by current and future property owners, shall run with the land, and shall
prohibit development, alteration, and disturbance within the easement except for purposes of habitat
enhancement as part of an enhancement project. The enhancement project shall receive prior written
approval from the City, and from any other agency with jurisdiction over such activity.
8. A covenant shall be placed on the open space tracts restricting their separate sale prior to Final Plat
recording. Each abutting lot owner, within the plat, shall have an undivided interest in the tracts or
the tracts shall be conveyed to the homeowner's association for the project.
9. The common boundary between the native growth protection tract and the abutting land must be
permanently identified. This identification shall include a permanent wood split rail fence and metal
signs on treated or metal posts. The permanent wood split rail fence and signs shall be installed prior
to Final Plat recording.
10. The following note shall appear on the face of the Final Plat and shall also be recorded as a covenant
running with the land on the title of record for all affected lots on the title: "MAINTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITY: All owners of lots created or benefiting from this City action abutting or
including a native growth protection tract are responsible for maintenance and protection of the tract.
Maintenance includes ensuring that no alterations occur within the tract and that all vegetation
remains undisturbed unless the express written authorization of the City has been received."
11. A note shall be placed on the face of the final plat requiring that the front yard for Lots 1-5 face
toward extended Pasco Place NE. The note shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
cAlexamVenton%docsllua I 0-090.doc
BEFORE the HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore for the
CITY of RENTON
RECOMMENDATION
FILE NUMBER: LUAI 1-007, ECF, R
APPLICANT: City of Renton
1055 S Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
OWNER: Same as Applicant
TYPE OF CASE: Rezone (not requiring a Comprehensive Plan amendment)
from R-10 to R-14 (Former Fire Station 13 Rezone)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: GRANT
DATE OF RECOMMENDATION: Apri122, 2011
INTRODUCTION'
The City of Renton (City) seeks rezone from R-10 to R-14 of a 20,000 square foot (SF) site.
The City filed the rezone application in early February, 2011. The Renton Department of Community and
Economic Development, Planning Division (Planning) deemed the application to be complete when filed.
(Testimony)
The subject property is located at 17040 108th Avenue SE.
The Renton Hearing Examiner Pro Tempore (Examiner) viewed the subject property on April 19, 2011.
Any statement in this section deemed to be either a Finding of Fact or a Conclusion of Law is hereby adopted as such.
c Acxamlrentonldocsllua 11-007.doc
4
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore RECOMMENDATION
RE: LUA 11-007, ECF, R (Former Fire Station 13 Rezone)
April 22, 2011
Page 2 of 8
The Examiner held an open record hearing on April 19, 2011. Planning gave notice of the hearing as
required by the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). (Exhibit 8 2)
The following exhibits were entered into the hearing record during the hearing:
Exhibits 1 - 6: As enumerated in Exhibit 7
Exhibit 7: Staff' Report
Exhibit 8: Hearing notice documentation
The action taken herein and the requirements, limitations and/or conditions imposed by this decision are, to
the best of the Examiner's knowledge or belief, only such as are lawful and within the authority of the
Examiner to take pursuant to applicable law and policy.
ISSUES
Does the application meet the criteria for approval of a rezone not requiring a Comprehensive Plan
amendment as established within the RMC?
No testimony or evidence was entered into the record by the general public either in support of or in
opposition to the application.
110110111la rol a yLI1
The City seeks to change the zoning of the former Fire Station 13 site so that it will match the zoning
of the lands that surround it. The rectangular, nearly half -acre site is located on the east side of 108'h
Avenue SE, approximately midway between SE 170`h and SE 1721" Streets, in the Benson Hill area.
(Exhibit 4)
2. The site itself is now vacant. The surrounding area exhibits a variety of zones and uses. The parcels
immediately surrounding are all zoned R-14 and exhibit a mix of single-family residences, home-
based or small businesses, or vacant land. Beyond the immediate parcels are more single-family
homes, multi -family structures, a neighborhood business area to the north, and a larger business area
to the south. Multiple zones are found within a quarter -mile area, including R-8, R-10, R-14, CN,
and CA. (Exhibits 2, 4, and 7)
3. This site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone. (Exhibit 7, p. 3)
2 Exhibit citations are provided for the reader's benefit and indicate. ])The source of quote or specific fact; and/or 2)
The major document(s) upon which a stated fact is based. While the Examiner considers all relevant documents in the
record, typically only major documents are cited. The Examiner's Decision is based upon all documents in the record.
c;%cxamlrentonldoc0ua 11-007.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore RECOMMENDATION
RE: LUAI 1-007, ECF, R (Farmer Fire Station 13 Rezone)
April 22, 201 1
Page 3 of 8
4. Subsection 4-9-180F2 RMC sets forth the review criteria for a rezone which does not require a
Comprehensive Plan amendment. Those criteria and the facts associated with each are:
A. RMC 4-9-180F2a. "The rezone is in the public interest, and"
Facts: Approval of the requested rezone will eliminate a small island of R-10 zoning in the
midst of a large area of R-14 zoning. (Exhibit 2) Making the area zoning consistent serves
the public interest.
B. RMC 4-9-180F2b: "The rezone tends to further the preservation and enjoyment of any
substantial property rights of the petitioner, and"
Facts: Making the zoning of this site the same as that of all the parcels which surround it will
provide the City with the same property rights as its surrounding neighbors.
C. RMC 4-9-180F2c: "The rezone is not materially detrimental to the public welfare of the
properties of other persons located in the vicinity thereof, and"
Facts: The City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Responsible Official, the
Environmental Review Committee, issued a threshold Determination of Nonsignificance
(DNS) for the requested rezone on March 21, 2011. (Exhibit 6) The DNS was not appealed.
(Exhibit 7, p. 3)
D. RMC 4-9-18 0172d: "The rezone meets the review criteria in subsection F1 of this Section."
Those criteria are:
i. RMC 4-9-180171a: "Is consistent with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive
Plan; and"
Facts: The Comprehensive Plan designation for the area in which the parcel is located
is Residential Medium Density (RMD). (Exhibit 3) The RMD designation is intended
to create the opportunity for a diverse neighborhood with a variety of housing and
ownership options.
Policy LU -163. Areas may be conserved for Residential 14 (R-14)
zoning where the site meets the following criteria:
1) Adjacent to major arterials(v);
2) Adjacent to the Urban Center, Highlands Center Village, or
Commercial Corridor Designations;
3) Part of a designation totaling over 20 acres (acreage may be in
separate ownership);
c:lexamlrentonldocsllua I 1-007.doc
BEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore RECOMMENDATION
RE: LUA l 1-007, ECF, R (Former Fire Station 13 Rezone)
April 22, 201 1
Page 4 of 8
4) Site is buffered from single-family area or other existing
potentially incompatible uses; and
S) Development within the density range and of similar unit type is
achievable given environmental constraints.
Although the site is on a minor arterial, if considered as part of the R-14 area that
surrounds it, the R-14 area is adjacent to State Route 515, a major arterial. The R-14
area as a whole is also adjacent to a Commercial Corridor designation and totals over
20 acres, meeting the second and third criteria. Since there are no critical areas, and
the surrounding neighborhood already contains a mix of uses, it is reasonable to
expect that development on the site could achieve the required density range of the R-
14 zone (10 to 18 units). (Exhibits 2, 4, and 7)
Ii. RMC 4-9-180F1b: "At least one of the following circumstances applies:
"i. The property subject to rezone was not specifically considered at the time
of the last area land use analysis and area zoning; or
"ii. Since the most recent land use analysis or the area zoning of the subject
property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other
circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material
change."
Facts: The Fire Station 13 site was an extra -municipal "island" of City land
surrounded by unincorporated King County before the Benson Hill annexation
occurred in 2008. The Fire Station 13 site had an RMD Comprehensive Plan
designation and was zoned R-10.
In 2007, the City pre -zoned the Benson Hill area in anticipation of annexation.
Because the Fire Station 13 property was already a part of the City and had already
been assigned a land use designation (RMD) and zone classification (R-10), it was
not considered in the 2007 area -wide pre -zoning for the Benson Hill area.
When the Benson Hill area annexed into the City in 2008, the 2007 pre -zoning for
the area was implemented: All of the parcels around Fire Station 13 were also
designated RNID, but were zoned R-14. That left the Fire Station 13 site as the only
R-10 zoned parcel in the immediate area. 3 Fire Station 13 was also relocated to
another site at about the same time, leaving the subject property vacant. (Exhibit 7, p.
2)
The Staff Report refers to this as "a spot -zoning situation". (Exhibit 7, p.2) Strictly speaking, this is not improper "spot -
zoning." The judicially created spot -zoning doctrine refers to a situation in which a small area is zoned differently from
the area surrounding it and not in conformance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Since both the R-10 and the R-14
zones serve to implement the Comprehensive Plan's RMD designation, the existence of the small R-10 zoned parcel,
although not particularly logical or desirable, is not an example of improper spot -zoning.
c:lexamlrentonldocsllua I 1-007.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore RECOMMENDATION
RE: LUA 11-007, ECF, R (Former Fire Station 13 Rezone)
April 22, 2011
Page 5 of 8
Any Conclusion of Law deemed to be a Finding of Fact is hereby adopted as such.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK'
The Examiner is legally required to decide this case within the framework created by the following
principles:
Authori
A rezone not requiring a Comprehensive Plan amendment is a Type N application which is subject to an
open record hearing before the Examiner. Following the hearing, the Examiner issues a recommendation on
the application which is subject to the right of reconsideration before action by the City Council. [RMC 4-
08-070H3a, 4-8-080G, 4-8-100G4, and 4-9-180D]
The Examiner may
grant or deny the application, or the Examiner may require of the applicant such conditions,
modifications and restrictions as the Examiner finds necessary to make the application
compatible with its environment and carry out the objectives and goals of the Comprehensive
Plan, the zoning regulations, the subdivision regulations, the codes and ordinances of the
City of Renton, and the approved preliminary plat, if applicable. Conditions, modifications
and restrictions which may be imposed are, but are not limited to, additional setbacks,
screenings in the form of landscaping and fencing, covenants, easements and dedications of
additional road rights-of-way. Performance bonds may be required to insure compliance with
the conditions, modifications and restrictions.
[RMC 4-8-100G3]
Review Criteria
The review criteria for rezones are found at RMC 4-9-180F2 and have been set forth in the Findings of Fact,
above.
The Local Project Review Act [Chapter 36.70B RCW] establishes a mandatory "consistency" review for
"project permits", a term defined by the Act to include "building permits, subdivisions, binding site plans,
planned unit developments, conditional uses, shoreline substantial development permits, site plan review,
permits or approvals required by critical area ordinances, site-specific rezones authorized by a
comprehensive plan or subarea plan". [RCW 36.70B.020(4)]
(1) Fundamental land use planning choices made in adopted comprehensive plans and
development regulations shall serve as the foundation for project review. The review of a
Any statement in this section deemed to be either a Finding of Fact or a Conclusion of Law is hereby adopted as such.
cAlexwnVen1onWocsUua11-00Tdoc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore RECOMMENDATION
RE: LUA 11-007, ECS', R (Former Fire Station 13 Rezone)
April 22, 201 1
Page 6 of 8
proposed project's consistency with applicable development regulations or, in the absence of
applicable regulations the adopted comprehensive plan, under RCW 36.7013.040 shall
incorporate the determinations under this section.
(2) During project review, a local government or any subsequent reviewing body shall
determine whether the items listed in this subsection are defined in the development
regulations applicable to the proposed project or, in the absence of applicable regulations the
adopted comprehensive plan. At a minimum, such applicable regulations or plans shall be
determinative of the:
(a) Type of land use permitted at the site, including uses that may be allowed
under certain circumstances, such as planned unit developments and conditional and
special uses, if the criteria for their approval have been satisfied;
(b) Density of residential development in urban growth areas; and
(c) Availability and adequacy of public facilities identified in the comprehensive
plan, if the plan or development regulations provide for funding of these facilities as
required by [the Growth Management Act].
[RCW 36.70B.030]
Vested Rights
Renton has not enacted a general vested rights provision. Rezones are not the subject of any statutory vesting
provision. Washington has a judicially -created vested rights doctrine:
Washington does adhere to the minority rule that a landowner obtains a vested right to
develop land when he or she makes a timely and complete building permit application that
complies with the applicable zoning and building ordinances in effect on the date of the
application. Our vested rights rule also has been applied to building permits, conditional use
permits, a grading permit, and a [shoreline management] substantial development permit.
[Norco Construction v. King County, 97 Wn.2d 680, 684, 649 P.2d 103 (1982), citations omitted] The
vested rights doctrine has never been applied to rezone applications.
Standard of Review
The standard of review is preponderance of the evidence. The applicant has the burden of proof.
Scope of Consideration
The Examiner has considered: all of the evidence and testimony; applicable adopted laws, ordinances, plans,
and policies; and the pleadings, positions, and arguments of the parties of record.
4;Aexamlrentonldoc:sUua I 1-007.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore RECOMMENDATION
RE= LUAI 1-007, ECF, R (Former Fire Station 13 Rezone)
April 22, 2011
Page 7 of S
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
A rezone which does not require a Comprehensive Plan amendment must meet all four criteria in
RMC 4-9-180F2: The conjunctive "and" at the end of each criterion indicates that all must be met.
The fourth criterion incorporates the criteria in RMC 4-9-180F1. Those criteria are structured
differently: In order to meet Criterion F2d, an application must meet Criterion F 1 a and one or more
of the two criteria in F l b (because those two criteria are separated by the disjunctive "or").
2. The evidence demonstrates convincingly that a rezone of the subject property from R-10 to R-14
meets the criteria in RMC 4-9-180F2a, F2b, and F2c as well as the criteria in Fla and Flbi, thus
meeting criterion F2d. The application meets all required criteria and deserves approval.
The requested rezone passes the "consistency" test: The R-14 density is fully consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan's RMD designation and utilities are available. (Exhibit 7, p. 3)
4. Finally, the requested rezone simply makes a lot of sense. It will eliminate an historical anomaly and
bring consistency to the area's residential zoning pattern.
Any Finding of Fact deemed to be a Conclusion of Law is hereby adopted as such.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the testimony and evidence submitted at
the open record hearing, and the Examiner's site view, the Examiner recommends that the City Council
GRANT the requested rezone from R-10 to R-14. No conditions need be imposed on the rezone.
Recommendation issued April 22, 2011.
ohn E. Galt
Hearing Examiner Pro Tempore
HEARING PARTICIPANTS 5
Erika Conkling
The official Parties of Record register is maintained by the City's Hearing Clerk.
c Alexamlrentonldocsl]ua 1 1-007.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore RECOMMENDATION
RE: LUA 11-007, ECF, R (Former Fire Station 13 Rezone)
April 22, 201 1
Page 8 of 8
0
NOTICE of RIGHT of RECONSIDERATION
"Any interested person feeling that the [recommendation] of the Examiner is based on an erroneous
procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be
reasonably available at the prior hearing may" file a request/motion for reconsideration with "the Examiner
within fourteen (14) days after the written [recommendation] of the Examiner has been rendered. The
[request/motion for reconsideration] shall set forth the specific errors relied upon." [RMC 4-8- l OOG4] Any
request/motion for reconsideration shall be addressed to the Renton Hearing Examiner and filed with the
City Clerk. See RMC 4-8-100G4 and RMC 4-8-110E8 for additional information and requirements
regarding reconsideration.
NOTICE of CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
This Recommendation (or the Examiner's Recommendation after reconsideration) will be considered by the
Renton City Council. Please contact the City Clerk for information regarding the scheduling of Council
consideration of this Recommendation. Please have the applicant's name and City file number available
when you contact the city.
c AexamrentonldocsVua 1 1-007.dw
From:
John E. Galt Uegalt@frontier.com]
Sent:
Friday, April 22, 2011 10:10 AM
To:
Stacy -fucker; Rocale Timmons
Cc:
Jennifer T. Henning; Bonnie Walton
Subject:
Olympus Villa Decision attached
Attachments:
LUA10-090. doc
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Flagged
Stacy and Rocale,
My decision is attached; 1 will put a signed original in today's outgoing mail addressed to Stacy.
My other jurisdictions use the electronic version to make copies to distribute to parties of record. (That saves time as they
don't have to wait for the signed version to arrive before issuing the decisiontrecommendation.) I suggest that system be
used here.
Have a good weekend,
John E. Galt
Hearing Examiner/Officer
Mediator
Voice/FAX: (425) 259-3144
•
BEFORE the HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore for the
CITY of RENTON
FILE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
OWNERS:
TYPE OF CASE:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
SUMMARY OF DECISION:
DATE OF DECISION:
f��%y [�7►1
LUA 10-090, ECF, PP
Finkbeiner Development
ATTN: Bill Finkbeiner
12011 Bel -Red Road, Suite 206
Bellevue, WA 98005
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner
13607 46150 Avenue SE
North Bend, WA 98045
Preliminary subdivision (Olympus Villa)
Approve subject to conditions
GRANT subject to conditions (revised)
April 22, 2011
INTRODUCTION'
Finkbeiner Development (Finkbeiner) seeks preliminary approval of Olympus Villa, an 11 lot single family
residential subdivision of a 6.72 acre site zoned R-4-
Finkbeiner filed the preliminary subdivision application on December 22, 2010. (Exhibit 11 Z) The Renton
Department of Community and Economic Development, Planning Division (Planning) deemed the
application to be complete on January 7, 2011. (Testimony)
Any statement in this section deemed to be either a Finding of Fact or a Conclusion of Law is hereby adopted as such.
Exhibit citations are provided for the reader's benefit and indicate: 1) The source of a quote or specific fact; and/or 2)
The major document(s) upon which a stated fact is based. While the Examiner considers all relevant documents in the
record, typically only major documents are cited_ The Examiner's Decision is based upon all documents in the record.
c:\documents and settings\bwaltongocat settingslternporary internet files\content.outicxaklx7dzyuna\luai0-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro T'einpure DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 2 of 15
The subject property is located at 12XXX Nile Avenue NE (aka 148th Avenue SE), approximately 800 feet
north of NE 6th Street (aka SE 124`h Street).
The Renton Hearing Examiner Pro Tempore (Examiner) viewed the subject property on April 19, 2011.
The Examiner held an open record hearing on April 19, 2011. Planning gave notice of the hearing as
required by the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). (Exhibit 14)
The following exhibits were entered into the hearing record during the hearing:
Exhibits 1 - 12: As enumerated in Exhibit 1, the Staff Report
Exhibit 13: Applicant -requested condition changes
Exhibit 14: Hearing notice documentation
The Examiner held the hearing record open for up to two days at the request of Finkbeiner and Planning for
receipt of a water availability letter and for entry of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Report.
The following documents were entered pursuant to that authority:
Exhibit 15: Water District 90 water availability letter
Exhibit 16: Environmental Review Committee Report
The record closed on April 20, 2011, with receipt of Exhibit 15_
The action taken herein and the requirements, limitations and/or conditions imposed by this decision are, to
the best of the Examiner's knowledge or belief, only such as are lawful and within the authority of the
Examiner to take pursuant to applicable law and policy.
ISSUES
Does the application meet the criteria for preliminary subdivision approval as established within the RMC?
Should the subdivision's internal street system include a northerly extension of Pasco Place NE?
FINDINGS OF FACT
The subject property is essentially a "flag" lot which has 54.42 feet of frontage on the east side of
Nile Avenue NE and which extends some 1,290 feet to the east, eventually widening to
approximately 315 feet. (Exhibit 3) The property is presently vacant, although the remains of a
building, presumed to be a former residence which was demolished at an unknown time in the past,
are located on the western portion of the site. (Exhibit 5 and testimony)
c:ldocuments and settingslbwaltoWJocal settingsltemporary internes files'content.outlooklx7dzyu»allual0-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tei7ipore DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP (Olvmpus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 3 of 15
2. A variety of land uses abut the subject property.
A. The western "notch" on the south side of the subject property created by the 157 foot
southerly "Jog" in the south property line is occupied by an approximate 2.3 acre parcel (the
Shenk parcel). The Shenk parcel contains a single-family residence near its Nile Avenue NE
frontage. (Exhibits 1, 5, and 12C and testimony)
B. The east half of the south property line abuts the north edge of the developed Windwood
single-family residential subdivision. One of the streets in Windwood, Pasco Place NE,
terminates against the common property line with the subject property. Pasco Place NE
extends southerly through Windwood to eventually provide a connection to NE 4th Street (aka
SE 128`h Street). Windwood is a development of some 100+ homes. (Exhibits 2, 3, and 5)
Windwood was developed under King County regulations. (Testimony)
C. The east property line abuts the rear lot line of six lots in Maureen Highlander, another 100 +
lot single-family residential subdivision developed under King County regulations.
Windwood and Maureen Highlands are interconnected via NE 6th Street which extends
westerly to Nile Avenue NE. (Exhibits 2, 3, and 5 and testimony)
D. The north property line abuts all or a portion of seven acreage lots, most of which access SE
120th Street a short distance to the north. One of those lots (the Newman property) is larger
than the rest and is undeveloped; the rest appear to each contain a single-family residence.
(Exhibits 2 and 5 and testimony)
3. The subject property is essentially flat with a very gentle downward slope from east to west. (Exhibit
3) Two regulated wetlands are found on the property: A small Category 3, disturbed wetland near the
west 'end of the site, and a significantly larger, forested, Category 2 wetland located just east of the
Pasco Place NE right-of-way alignment {extended). (Exhibits 3 and 7) Vegetation consists of a mix
of shrubs, groundcover, and 95 trees. (Exhibits 1 and 5) The subject property is not located in the
Aquifer Protection Zone. (Exhibit 1, p. 3)
4. Finkbeiner proposes to subdivide the subject property into 11 lots for single-family residential
development, two open space tracts (Tracts A and C) totaling 87,966 square feet (SF), a 15,837 SF
stormwater control tract (Tract B), and a 62,705 SF tract for future development (Tract D). (Exhibit
3) Finkbeiner has no plans to develop Tract D. (Testimony) Tract D is effectively isolated by the
Category 2 wetland on Tract A from the rest of the subject property and can realistically be accessed
only from the north. For all intents and purposes, Tract D most likely cannot be developed until the
acreage lot to its north is further developed.
The proposed lots will be served by two public streets: An east -west street (proposed NE 7th Place)
extending from Nile Avenue NE to an extension of Pasco Place NE through the property. Proposed
cAldocuments and settingslbwalton%local settingsVemporary internet filesloontentoutlook\x7dzyuna11ua1"90.doc
FEARING EXAMINER Pro 'Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090, ECF,.PP (0hyinpus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 4 of 15
NE 7* Place will be developed as a "half -street' section, allowing for future widening to a full -width
section at such time as the Shenk property develops. (Exhibit 3)
Finkbeiner proposes to use the "clustering" provisions of the RMC for some of the proposed lots. As
depicted on Exhibit 3, Proposed Lots 1 — 5 take advantage of those provisions. Finkbeiner asked at
hearing to be allowed to include Proposed Lots 6 and 7 in the clustering calculations. (Exhibits 1 and
3 and testimony)
The density of Olympus Villa as proposed will be 2.6 dwelling units per net acre. (Exhibit 1)
The subdivision design and all of the proposed lots comply with RMC zoning, street, street network,
parks, blocks, and lot configuration requirements. All of the proposed single-family residential lots
access a public street. (Exhibits 1 and 3)
6. The record contains evidence that appropriate provisions have been made or can be made for:
A. Open space. Small lot clusters of up to a maximum of fifty lots are allowed within the R-4
zone when at least 30 % of the site is permanently- set aside as "significant open space." Such
open space must be situated to act as a visual buffer between small lot clusters and other
development in the zone. The area of Tract A comes up a little shy of the 30% set aside
requirement (87,618 SF / 293,152 SF = 29.88%). While Tract D will not be immediately
developed, it is not proposed to be set aside as permanent open space and, therefore, cannot
count towards the open space requirement. Tract C (348 Sl;) is also to be dedicated as open
space. However, "Tract C is not located in an area which would serve as a visual buffer
between the small lot cluster and other development in the area. (Exhibit 1)
Finkbeiner testified that he could easily adjust the common boundary between Tracts A and
D to provide the necessary increase in the area of Tract A. (Testimony)
B. Drainage ways. All stormwater runoff except that from Proposed Lot 1 will be collected and
transported to a detention pond on Tract B from which it will flow into the drainage system
along Nile Avenue NE. (Exhibit 6) The pond will replace the wetland now located there.
Mitigation for the loss of that wetland is proposed in the area of the wetland in Tract A.
(Exhibit 7)
Stormwater runoff from Proposed Lot 1 will be dispersed into the wetland to its north and
east. (Exhibit 6)
C. Streets and roads. The proposed streets and street system meet City standards. (Exhibit 1)
cidocuments and settineslhwa1tonlloca1 settings\femporary internet files\ ontent-outlookbc7dzyuna11ua10-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP (01yinpus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 5 of 15
D. Alleys. Proposed Lots 2 & 3 and 4 & 5 will be served by two private easements which will
function as alleys, allowing access to those lots from the rear of the lots. (Exhibit 3 and
testimony)
E_ Other public ways. No need for other public ways within the subdivision exists. (Exhibits l
and 3)
F. Potable water supply. The subject property lies within Water District 90 which has confirmed
the availability of an adequate supply of potable water. (Exhibit 15)
G. Sanitary wastes. An 8" sanitary sewer main exists beneath Pasco Place NE. (Exhibit 1)
H. Parks and recreation. The project has been required through the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) threshold determination process (See Finding of Fact 7, below.) to make a park
impact mitigation payment. (Exhibit 16)
7. Renton`s SEPA Responsible Official, the ERC, issued aDetermination of Nonsignificance -Mitigated
(DNS -M) on January 31, 2011. (Exhibit 8) The DNS -M was not appealed. (Exhibit 1) The DNS -M
is based on three mitigation measures: Payment of a parks and recreation impact fee, a transportation
impact fee, and a fire impact fee. (Exhibit 16) The three mitigation measures have been carried
forward by Planning as a recommended condition of approval. (Exhibit 1, p. 11, Recommended
Condition 1)
8. Most residents of Windwood have no objection to subdivision of the land to their north nor to the
proposed design with but one important exception: They are strongly opposed to the extension of and
use of Pasco Place NE. Windwood residents have experienced many problems with speeding drivers,
especially since the development of Maureen Highlands which resulted in the opening up of 6tn
Street NE through the neighborhood. Stop signs have been installed, but some motorists ignore them.
The Windwood residents believe (bat the extension of Pasco Place NE will only make the situation
worse. They see no reason why their neighborhood needs to be connected to the Olympus Villa
neighborhood. (Exhibits 12A and 12D and testimony)
The RMC requires that all new development establish and further an interconnecting grid system.
The code allows for exceptions to the grid street requirement in only two situations: Where
interconnection is infeasible due to topography; or where interconnection is infeasible due to existing
substantial improvements. [RMC 4-7-150, exceptions listed in 4-7-150E3] Neither condition that
would justify an exception is present in this case: No topographical problems exist and no
improvements would block the extension. (Exhibit 3)
9. One of the abutting owners in Maureen Highlands wants the easterly 60 feet of Tract D set aside as
open space to protect three deer and a fawn who reportedly live in the area. (Exhibit 12B) Another
cAdocuments and settingstbwaltonUocal setting0emporary intemel feleslcontent.outlooklx7dzyuna&a10-090.doc
0
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 6 of 15
Maureen I- ighland.5 resident is concerned that the development not increase stormwater flows
towards the east and would prefer fewer, larger lots_ (Exhibit 12E)
10. Newman, the owner of one of the lots to the north, would like to see the Pasco Place NE extension
curve more to the east than is proposed. He notes that, as designed, the right-of-way will stub out just
to the west of the common boundary between his property and the property of his neighbor to the
east. He would like the right-of-way stub to be centered on their common boundary, so that further
extension to the north through their properties would encumber each equally. (Testimony)
The alignment of the Pasco Place NE extension right-of-way cannot shift measurably to the east
within the subject property due to the location of the Category 2 wetland and its required buffer.
(Exhibit 3 and testimony) In order to make the adjustment Newman seeks, a reverse curve would
have to occur just to the north of the subject property.
Street alignment within subdivisions must comply with standards set by RMC 4-6-060. [RMC 4-7-
150D] A deflection angle of 10° or more must occur through a horizontal "curve of reasonably long
radius". Further, wherever a reverse curve is to occur (an "S" curve or a chicane), there must be a
"tangent section" (a straight segment between the curves) of not less than 100 feet for residential
access streets. [RMC 4-6-060177a and F7c] Given that Newman's parcel has a north -south dimension
of approximately 250 feet (measured from Exhibit 2), the required curves and tangent section would
take most of the depth of his parcel to complete.
11. Shenk submitted a comment letter and testified at the hearing. The letter lists a number of concerns
resulting from misunderstanding some of the notations on the proposed preliminary plat. (Exhibit
12C) Shenk did not mention those concerns in his testimony.
Shenk wonders why Finkbeiner will not be required to install sewer stub -outs towards the south
when he installs the sewer beneath future NE 7th PIace. He suggests that installing them when the
sewer main is initially laid would eliminate the need to tear up the street later when his property
develops. (Testimony)
Staff responded that a major problem with such an idea is that no one can know where the stub -outs
might be needed on his side of the street until a development proposal for his property is put forth.
(Testimony)
12. Planning performed a comprehensive, detailed, thorough analysis of the proposal's conformance
with applicable requirements of the RMC. Planning concludes that the proposal complies, or can be
conditioned to comply, with all applicable requirements. (Exhibit 1)
13. Planning recommends approval of the proposed subdivision subject to 10 conditions. (Exhibit 1, pp.
11 and 12) Finkbeiner asks for revision to four of the recommended conditions:
cadocuments and settinps bwaltonllocal settingslternrwary intemet fileslcontent,outloaklx7dzyunalluaI0-090_doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
R.F.: LU A] 0-090, ECF, PP (ol)Ympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 7 of 15
A. Recommended Condition 3: Finkbeiner wants to be able to include Proposed Lots 6 and 7 in
the clustering process. Finkbeiner wants to gain increased flexibility so that Proposed Lots 4
and 5 might be slightly enlarged. (Exhibit 13) Planning supports that requested change.
(Testimony)
B. Recommended Condition 4: While Finkbeiner agrees that Proposed Lots 2 — 5 should access
from NE 7" Place, he does not like the language which would limit that access to the
easements as depicted on Exhibit 3. He wants the flexibility to alter their alignment. (Exhibit
13) Planning has no objection to providing some flexibility; but wants to limit the number of
curb cuts and prohibit direct access onto Pasco Place NE. (Testimony) The RMC effectively
requires alley access in residential cluster designs. [RMC 4-7-150E5e]
C. Recommended Condition 6: This condition requires 1 " water meters to serve Proposed Lots
6 -- 11. That condition is based on the fact that, as presently designed, houses built on those
lots would have to be equipped with fire suppression sprinkler systems (because of the width
of the half -street section) which in turn require a larger -than -normal water meter. Finkbeiner
wants the flexibility to adjust the plat (slightly widening the half -street right-of-way) such
that those lots would not need to be sprinklered. (Exhibit 13 and testimony) Staff testified
that the Fire Marshal determines which lots must be sprinklered just before final construction
plans are approved. Staff now believes that Recommended Condition 6 should have been
provided as an advisory note rather than as a recommended condition of approval.
(Testimony)
D. Recommended Condition 8: Finkheiner would like the flexibility to have the open space
tracts owned in common by a homeowners association instead of owned in common by the
lot owners abutting the tracts. (Exhibit 13) Planning supports that requested change.
(Testimony)
14. Any Conclusion of Law deemed to be a Finding of Fact is hereby adopted as such.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK -'
The Examiner is legally required to decide this case within the framework created by the following
principles:
Authori
A preliminary subdivision is a Type 111 application which is subject to an open record hearing before the
Examiner. The Examiner makes a final decision on the application which is subject to the right of
reconsideration and appeal to the City Council. [RMC 4-08-070H1j, 4-8-080G, and 4-8-100G41
Any statement in this section deemed to be either a Finding of Fact or a Conclusion of Law is hereby adopted as such_
6docutnents and settings\bwaltonllocal settingsVemporary intemet files\content.outlooklx7dzyunallua 10-090.doc
HEARING EXAMfNER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP (01y»Pus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 8 of 15
The Examiner may
grant or deny the application, or the Examiner may require of the applicant such conditions,
modifications and restrictions as the Examiner finds necessary to make the application
compatible with its environment and carry out the objectives and goals of the Comprehensive
Plan, the zoning regulations, the subdivision regulations, the codes and ordinances of the
City of Renton .... Conditions, modifications and restrictions which may be imposed are, but
are not limited to, additional setbacks, screenings in the form of landscaping and fencing,
covenants, easements and dedications of additional road rights-of-way. Performance bonds
may be required to insure compliance with the conditions, modifications and restrictions.
[RMC 4-8-100G3]
Review Criteria
The review criteria for preliminary subdivisions are set forth at RMC 4-7-08OB:
B. PRINCIPLES OF ACCEPTABILITY:
A subdivision shall be consistent with the following principles of acceptability:
1. Legal Lots: Create legal building sites which comply with all provisions of the City
Zoning Code.
2. Access: Establish access to a public road for each segregated parcel.
3. Physical Characteristics: Have suitable physical characteristics. A proposed plat may
be denied because of flood, inundation, or wetland conditions. Construction of protective
improvements may be required as a condition of approval, and such improvements shall be
noted on the final plat.
4. Drainage: Make adequate provision for drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public
ways, water supplies and sanitary wastes.
(Bold headings in original) Requirements and standards for street and trail networks, parks and open space,
streets, residential blocks, and lot configuration are set forth in RMC 4-7-120 and -140 — 170.
The Local Project Review Act [Chapter 36.70B RCW] establishes a mandatory "consistency" review for
"project permits", a term defined by the Act to include "building permits, subdivisions, binding site plans,
planned unit developments, conditional uses, shoreline substantial development permits, site plan review,
permits or approvals required by critical area ordinances, site-specific rezones authorized by a
comprehensive plan or subarea plan". [RCW 36.70B.020(4)]
(1) Fundamental land use planning choices made in adopted comprehensive plans and
development regulations shall serve as the foundation for project review. The review of a
proposed project's consistency with applicable development regulations or, in the absence of
applicable regulations the adopted comprehensive plan, under RCW 36.70B.040 shall
incorporate the determinations under this section.
cAdocuments and settingslbwaltonllocal settingsltemporary internet fileslcontent_outkioklx7d7.una11ua10-090.dm
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 9 of 15
(2) During project review, a local government or any subsequent reviewing body shall
determine whether the items listed in this subsection are defined in the development
regulations applicable to the proposed project or, in the absence of applicable regulations the
adopted comprehensive plan. At a minimum, such applicable regulations or plans shall be
determinative of the:
(a) Type of land use permitted at the site, including uses that may be allowed
under certain circumstances, such as planned unit developments and conditional and
special uses, if the criteria for their approval have been satisfied;
(b) Density of residential development in urban growth areas; and
(c) Availability and adequacy of public facilities identified in the comprehensive
plan, if the plan or development regulations provide for funding of these facilities as
required by [the Growth Management Act] .
[RCW 36.70B.0301
Vested Rights
Renton has not enacted a general vested rights provision. Therefore, applicable provisions of state law
govern:
Subdivision and short subdivision applications are governed by a statutory vesting rule: such
applications "shall be considered under the subdivision or short subdivision ordinance, and
zoning or other land use control ordinances, in effect on the land at the time a fully
completed application ... has been submitted ...."
[RCW 58.17.033; see also SMC 16.28.480] Therefore, this preliminary subdivision application is vested to
the regulations as they existed on January 7, 2011.
Standard of Review
The standard of review is preponderance of the evidence. The applicant has the burden of proof.
Scope of Consideration
The Examiner has considered: all of the evidence and testimony; applicable adopted laws. ordinances, plans,
and policies; and the pleadings, positions, and arguments of the parties of record.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates compliance with the preliminary subdivision
approval criteria in RMC 4-7-080B 1: All of the proposed lots will comply with zoning regulations.
0documents and settings\bwaltonllocal setttngsltemporary intmet files\content.outlooklx7dzyvna\luaI0-090.doc
I JEAR1NG EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Vilhi)
April 22, 2011
Page 10 of 15
2. The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates compliance with the preliminary subdivision
approval criteria in RMC 4-7-080132: Each lot will have access to a public street.
3. The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates compliance with the preliminary subdivision
approval criteria in RMC 4-7-080B3: The major on-site critical area is to be protected; mitigation in
conformance with adopted standards is proposed for the loss of the lesser critical area_
4. The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates compliance with the preliminary subdivision
approval criteria in RMC 4-7-080134: The streets and drainage systems have been designed to
comply with City codes and standards. A minor shortfall in open space can be easily fixed by an
appropriate condition. Adequate utility services are available.
5. The preceding four Conclusions of Law show that Olympus Villa complies with all established
criteria for approval. However, they likely don't answer some of the neighbors' concerns. The next
Conclusions of Law will address their concerns.
6. The Windwood design obviously contemplated the eventual extension of Pasco Place NE to serve
subdivision of the acreage parcels to the north, of which the subject property is one. Whether the
home purchasers clearly understood that or not, that is the reality presented by a street which stubs
out to an adjoining undeveloped parcel. Olympus Villa's design is simply bringing that expectation to
fruition.
Renton has strong requirements for interconnection of streets between and among adjoining
developments. Just because King County did not have interconnection requirements is no reason to
not implement and enforce the City's requirements. The interconnection of Pasco PIace NE with
proposed NE 7th Place will provide a second access into not only Olympus Villa, but also the north
end of Windwood: If an accident were to block the Pasco Place NE/NE 6th Street intersection now,
emergency vehicles could not reach any of the homes on Pasco Place NE north of NE 6th Street. The
interconnection will provide an alternate access_ And as one of the witnesses acknowledged, many if
not most of the speeders are neighborhood residents, not outsiders cutting through the neighborhood.
The neighbors and the City have a range of actions that can be taken to solve the speeding problem
short of ignoring adopted requirements for interconnection of streets.
7. The RMC provides no basis upon which one could require that the eastern 60 feet of Tract D be set
aside permanently as open space. Wildlife presently living on the portions of the site which will be
converted into streets and house lots will, most likely, be lost. That loss is a direct result of the
legislative decision to urbanize this area. Urbanization is, generally speaking, incompatible with
most wildlife species habitat, especially for animals such as deer, bear, coyote, etc. The legislative
decision to designate and zone the area for urbanization amounts to a conscious choice of human
habitat over wildlife habitat. That legislative choice is not debatable in the context of this (or any
other quasi-judicial) application.
c:ldocunments and settings\bwaltonUocat settingsVemporary internet files\content.outlooklx7dzyuna\luaIM90.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: 1..UA 1.0-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 11 of 15
As to the drainage concern of the other Maureen Highlands resident, the evidence indicates that the
vast majority of the stormwater runoff will be directed towards the west and Nile Avenue NE, not
towards Maureen Highlands on the east. There would seem to be virtually no chance that the small
amount of runoff from the residence on Proposed Lot 1 could ever affect Maureen Highlands given
the sire of Tract A with its wetland and intervening Tract D. Control of stormwater runoff from any
future development of Tract D will have to be addressed at the time a proposal for such development
is put forward.
8_ Were it not for the existence of the substantial Category 2 wetland just to the east of the Pasco Place
NE right-of-way (extended), Newman's request would likely have garnered the support of both
Finkbeiner and staff. But the wetland's location is a physical reality with which we all must live. City
policy and regulation strongly support protection of such wetlands. The street must avoid the wetland
to the greatest extent possible.
The unfortunate reality is that most of any right-of-way alignment adjustment will have to occur on
the property(les) to the north. It may be possible to begin a slight horizontal curve to the east near the
north property line without impinging on the wetland or its required buffer. (Minor revisions to
approved preliminary plats are allowed. [RMC 4-7-080M]) Newman and his neighbor may want to
discuss the pros and cons of such an alignment shift with Finkbeiner and City staff before
construction plans are prepared.
This situation does not warrant a delay in approval or redesign of the proposed preliminary plat.
9. Requiring sewer stubs to both sides of a new street makes sense, but only if both sides of the street
are being developed at the same time. No one can say when; if ever, the Shenk property may
develop_ No one can say what the land development requirements may be when the Shenk property
is proposed for development. Therefore, no one can say with any certainty exactly where sewer stubs
would be required. Installing sewer stubs based on a hypothetical development would make no sense
— even if it were legally defensible, which it likely isn't.
10. Olympus Villa passes the "consistency" test: Single-family residential is the primary use in the R-4
zone; the proposed density is within the range allowed by applicable zoning; and adequate utility
services are available to the site.
1 i . The recommended conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit 1 are reasonable, supported by the
evidence, and capable of accomplishment with the following changes:
A. A preliminary subdivision embodies the concept of approval of a specific development
proposal. A preliminary subdivision evaluation is based upon the specific preliminary plat
submitted by the applicant. It is appropriate, therefore, that the conditions of approval clearly
identify the plat which is being approved. The Planning recommendation as drafted does not
do so. Exhibit 3 constitutes the plat proposal which has been reviewed in this hearing process
c:ldocuments and settineslhwaltonllocal settittg0empormy iniernet filesleontenl_Outlookla7dzvuna11uaIO-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA 10-090. ECF, PP (Oly=mpus Villa)
April 22, 201 l
Page 12 of 15
and which should be approved. The Examiner will add a condition to specify that Exhibit 3 is
the approved preliminary plat; numbering of the subsequent conditions will be incremented
accordingly.
B. Recommended Conditions 3 and 8: The Examiner will revise those two conditions as
requested by Finkbeiner and as supported by Planning.
C. Recommended Condition 4: Both Finkbeiner and Planning made good points regarding the
wording of this condition. The Examiner will incorporate both points of view in revised
wording for this condition.
D. Recommended Condition 6: The Examiner will eliminate this condition. The preliminary
subdivision approval stage is way too early in the process to be specifying for all time the
size of water meters for specific lots. Authority exists under the International Fire Code to
address the concern that led to this condition.
E. Planning stated in the Staff Report that it was going to recommend placement of a note on
the face of the final plat requiring that the houses on Proposed Lots 1 5 must be oriented
towards Pasco place NE. (Exhibit 1, p. 9) That condition never made it into the list of
recommended conditions. (Exhibit 1, pp. 11 and 12) Finkbeiner objects to such a Iimitation
as pertains to Proposed Lots 3 and 4. (Testimony)
Minimum corner lot width and depth requirements for R-4 zoned land in a small lot cluster
development are 60 feet and 65 feet, respectively. [RMC 4-2-11 OA] Proposed Lot 3 can meet
those requirements for either orientation, but Proposed Lot 4 works only if its Pasco Place
NE frontage is considered its front lot line. Proposed Lots 1, 2, 4, and 5 must f=ront on Pasco
Place NE. A desirable streetscape requires that Proposed Lot 3 do likewise. The Examiner
will impose Planning's suggested condition.
F. The Examiner prefers to not use the word "applicant" in conditions. Land use entitlement
approvals, of which a preliminary subdivision approval is one type. "run with the land."
Simply put, that means the permit is still valid no matter how many times ownership of the
property may change. While it may be hyper -technical, some might argue that only the parry
which sought preliminary subdivision approval was the "applicant," that any successor in
interest was something other than the "applicant," and that, therefore, any such successor was
not obligated to comply with conditions addressed to the "applicant." To avoid any such
argument in the future, the Examiner prefers to use the word "plattor," meaning the party
subdividing (platting) the property. The Examiner will make that substitution throughout the
conditions.
c:ldocuments and settings\bwallonllocal settings4crnporary internet files\content_ outlooklx7dzyuna\lua10-090.doe
IIEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUA10-090, ECF, PP (Oly;npus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 13 of 1
G. A few minor, non -substantive structure, grammar, and/or punctuation revisions to
Recommended Conditions 1, 3, and 8 will improve parallel construction, clarity, and flow
within the conditions. Such changes will be made.
12. Any Finding of Fact deemed to be a Conclusion of Law is hereby adopted as such.
DECISION
Based upon the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the testimony and evidence submitted at
the open record hearing, and the Examiner's site view, the Examiner GRANTS preliminary subdivision
approval for Olympus Villa SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS.
Decision issued April 22, 2011.
lsl John E. Galt (Signed original in official file)
John F. Galt
Hearing Examiner Pro Tempore
HEARING PARTICIPANTS 4
Rocale Timmons Bill Finkbeiner
Kevin Van Flanderen John Newman
David Shenk Ken Bouvier
Kayren Kittrick
NOTICE of RIGHT of RECONSIDERATION
"Any interested person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on an erroneous procedure, errors
of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior hearing may" file a request/motion for reconsideration Aith "the Examiner within fourteen (14)
days after the written decision of the Examiner has been rendered. The [request/motion for reconsideration]
shall set forth the specific errors relied upon." [RMC 4-8-100G4] Any request/motion for reconsideration
shall be addressed to the Renton Hearing Examiner and filed with the City Clerk. See RMC 4-8-100G4 and
RMC 4-8-110E8 for additional information and requirements regarding reconsideration.
4 The official Parties of Record register is maintained by the City's Hearing Clerk.
c:ldocuments and settingslbwaltonllocal settingsltemporary internet Gleslcontent.outlooklx7dcyunallualb-Q94.doc
HEARING EXAMINER Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: L.UA 10-090, ECF, PP (01yinpus Villa)
April 22, 201 1
Page 14 of 15
NOTICE of RIGHT of APPEAL
This Decision becomes final and conclusive as of the fifteenth calendar day after the date of issuance of the
Decision unless reconsideration is timely requested. if reconsideration is timely requested, the Examiner's
order granting or denying reconsideration becomes the final and conclusive decision for the City. The
Examiner's final decision is subject to the right of the applicant, City, or a party of record with standing, as
provided in RMC 4-8-11OF1, to file an appeal with the City Council in accordance with the procedures of
RMC 4-8-11 OF. Any appeal must be filed within 14 days following the issuance of the final decision. See
RMC 4-8-110E9 and RMC 4-8-11 OF for additional information and requirements regarding appeals to the
City Council.
The following statement is provided pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130: "Affected property owners may request
a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation."
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Olympus Villa
LUA10-090, ECF, PP
This Preliminary Subdivision is subject to compliance with all applicable provisions, requirements, and
standards of the Renton Municipal Code, standards adopted pursuant thereto, and the following special
conditions:
Exhibit 3 is the approved preliminary plat. Revisions to approved preliminary subdivisions/plats are
regulated by RMC 4-7-080M.
2. The plattor shall comply with the three mitigation measures issued as part of the Determination of
Nonsignificance -Mitigated, dated February 4, 2011. (Exhibits 8 and 16)
3. The plattor shall be required to place additional area within Tract A in order to comply with the 30%
permanent open space requirement for clustering. The permanent open space casement shall be
recorded prior to or concurrently with the Final Plat.
4. The plattor shall place on the face of the plat a covenant noting the setbacks of the R-8 zoning
designation apply on the clustered lots (Proposed Lots 1-7) only. The covenant shall be recorded
concurrently with the Final Plat.
5. A note shall be placed on the face of the plat requiring Proposed Lots 2-5 to take vehicular access
from NE 7�' Place and requiring Proposed Lots 2 & 3 to share a common curb cut and Proposed Lots
4 & 5 to share a common curb cut unless compelling evidence is presented prior to construction
c:Aocuments and settineslbw•alton%cal settingsltemporary internet fileslcontent_outlookls7d7,yunallua]0-090.doc
HEARING EXAMINFI2 Pro Tempore DECISION
RE: LUAI 0-090, ECF, PP (Olympus Villa)
April 22, 2011
Page 15 of 15
permit approval to show that shared curb cuts are not feasible. The note shall be recorded
concurrently with the Final Plat.
6. The plattor shall be required to revise the drainage report (Exhibit 6) to include conceptual sizing
calculations for the detention pond and address the individual lot treatments. The revised plan shall
be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Plan Reviewer prior to construction permit
approval.
The plattor shall establish and record a permanent and irrevocable easement on the property title of
the tract containing the critical area and its buffer prior to Final Plat recording. The protective
easement shall be held by current and future property owners, shall run with the land, and shall
prohibit development, alteration, and disturbance within the easement except for purposes of habitat
enhancement as part of an enhancement project. The enhancement project shall receive prior written
approval from the City, and from any other agency with jurisdiction over such activity.
8. A covenant shall be placed on the open space tracts restricting their separate sale prior to Final Plat
recording. Each abutting lot owner, within the plat, shall have an undivided interest in the tracts or
the tracts shall be conveyed to the homeowner's association for the project.
9. The common boundary between the native growth protection tract and the abutting land must be
permanently identified. This identification shall include a permanent wood split rail fence and metal
signs on treated or metal posts. The permanent wood split rail fence and signs shall be installed prior
to Final Plat recording.
10. The following note shall appear on the face of the Final Plat and shall also be recorded as a covenant
running with the land on the title of record for all affected lots on the title: "MAINTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITY: All owners of lots created or benefiting from this City action abutting or
including a native growth protection tract are responsible for maintenance and protection of the tract.
Maintenance includes ensuring that no alterations occur within the tract and that all vegetation
remains undisturbed unless the express written authorization of the City has been received."
11. A note shall be placed on the face of the final plat requiring that the front yard for Lots 1-5 face
toward extended Pasco Place NE. The note shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
c:ldocuments and wttingslhwaltanllocal settingsVemporary internee flcslcontent, out1oo]6x7dzyuna11ua10-090_doe
T
0 0
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the lith day of April, 2011, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing
Report to the Hearing Examiner documents. This information was sent to:
Name
Representing
Bill Finkbeiner
Contact/Applicant
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner
Owners
Parties of Record
See Attached
(Signature of Sender):
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for
mentioned in the instrument.
Rated: — {
- Notary Public in and fo..the State of Washington
Notary (Print):
My appointment expires:->
a Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
b LUA10-090, ECF, PP
E
PARTIES OF RECORD
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIM PLAT
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner Bill Finkbeiner
13607 461st Avenue SE Finkbeiner Development
North Bend, WA 98045 12011 Bel -Red Road ste: #206
(owner) Bellevue, WA 98005
tel: (425) 454-7777
eml:
billf@finkbeinerdevelopment.com
(applicant/ contact)
Raymond Woo
14404 SE 87th Street
Newcastle, WA 98059
(party of record)
Pastor David Shenk Dinah Prather Robert Johnseine
Awesome Yah Church, Church of 709 Rosario Place NE 9805 NE 116th Street ste:
Yah in Christ Renton, WA 98059 #7499
702 Nile Avenue NE (party of record) Kirkland, WA 98034
Renton, WA 98059 (party of record)
(party of record)
Ken Bouvier Jarrod Faehnrich
721 Rosario Place NE 751 Drcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 761-6853 tel: (425) 241-0703
(party of record) eml: jarrodf@freethought.org
(party of record)
Jon Newman Karen Walter
8070 Langston Road S Watersheds and Land Use Team
Seattle, WA 98178 Leader
(party of record) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Fisheries Division
39015 172nd Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092
(party of record)
Kerry & Shana Curran
715 Rosario Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 466-8395
(party of record)
Mina Fletcher
667 Rosario Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
eml: vin_mina875@msn.com
(party of record)
Dion Coleman Michael Krohn Kevin Van Flandern
5821 NE 8th Street 457 Pasco Place NE 600 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059
(party of record) tel: (425) 890-6918 (party of record)
eml: mkrohnl29@gmail.com or
vicepresident@windwoodhoa.com
(party of record)
John Nelson Merrick McGinnis
12865 47th Place 5915 NE 4th Place
Bellevue, WA 98006 Renton, WA 98059
(party of record) eml:
treasurer@windwoodhoa.com
(party of record)
Peggy & George Bukota
577 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059-4553
(party of record)
Updated: 04/11/11 (Page 1 of 3)
0
PARTIES OF RECORD
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIM PLAT
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
aquette, PLS
Carlos Lopez
Brian Baggett
Technical College
523 Pasco Place NE
511 Pasco Place NE
4th Street
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
WA 98056
(party of record)
(party of record)
F record)
wler
George A. Sabol
Vyacheslav Rebrik
-a Place NE
528 Pasco Place NE
567 Pasco Place NE
WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
f record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
-caria
Elvina Tong
Allison Feely
:o Place NE
603 Pasco Place NE
615 Pasco Place NE
WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
F record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
ine
Mythu Chiem
Turen Pang
-a Place NE
665 Pasco Place NE
5914 NE 7th Street
WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
F record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Crews
Valerie Harris
Brandon Lee
7th Street
658 Pasco Place NE
618 Pasco Place NE
WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
F record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Ig
Mary Ann Ferreira
Wayne Messere
-o Place NE
556 Pasco Place NE
522 Pasco Place NE
WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
F record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
it
Ricky Canlez
Jill Wirick
-o Place NE
510 Pasco Place NE
5921 NE 4th Place
WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
F record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
er
Mary D'Ettore
Melissa Bouthillier
4th Place
6013 NE 4th Place
463 Pasco Place NE
WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
f record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
Iguyen
Michael Le
Kate Bressan
ncy Avenue NE
518 Quincy Avenue NE
564 Quincy Avenue NE
WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
Renton, WA 98059
f record)
(party of record)
(party of record)
D4/11/11 (Page 2 of 3)
Carl & Mary Beth Josef
608 Quincy Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Marilyn Dimalanta
601 Quincy Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Khanh Soliven
619 Quincy Avneue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Tony Roebuck .
572 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Carolyn Kine
513 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Dale Miller
462 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Jennifer Mazurkiewicz
572 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Lae Huynh
630 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Jay Coleman
655 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Updated: 04/11/11
PARTIES OF RECORD
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIM PLAT
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Linda Gallup
614 Quincy Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Joe Mendoza
568 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
James Moo
605 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Anh V. Nguyen
566 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Beng Cabrera
508 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Grace Wu
450 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Phong La
5715 NE 6th Street
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Todd Taylor
637 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Xiaofei Shi
661 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Daren Kobata
625 Quincy Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Louise Chan
671 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Cheryl Takano
617 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Robert Hansen
526 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Hyung J. Paik
480 Rosario Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Dora Kwong
5819 NE 6th Street
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Shelley Carlin
612 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Tom Beardslee
647 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(Page 3 of 3)
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D City of
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING
April 19, 2011
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 1:00 PM,
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL
The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which
they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner.
PROJECT NAME: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval for the subdivision of a
6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The project site is
located within the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation.
PROJECT NAME: Rezone of Former Fire Station 13
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA11-007, ECF, R
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a rezone of a 20,000 sq.ft. parcel that was formerly
the location of Fire Station 13. if approved, the parcel would be transferred from R-10 (Residential- 10
units per net acre) to R-14 (Residential -14 units per net acre).
HEX Agenda 4-19-11.doc
DEPARTMENT OF COMANITY I City of
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST
REPORT DATE:
April 12, 2011
Project Name.,
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
Owner:
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner; 13607 -461st Ave SE; North Bend, WA 98045
Applicant/Contact:
Bill Finkbeiner; Finkbeiner Development; 12011 Bel -Red Rd, Ste #206; Bellevue,
WA 98005
File Number:
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Project Manager:
Rocale Timmons; Associate Planner
Project Summary:
The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval for the subdivision of a 6.72
acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The
project site is located within the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning
designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in area
to 8,706 square feet_ Four tracts are proposed for drainage, critical areas and
open space. Access to the lots would be provided via an extension of Pasco PI NE
eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE. The applicant is proposing clustering for
Lots 1-5 due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site whereby R-8
development standards can be applied. The site contains a Category 2 and 3
wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill the smaller Category 3 wetland.
Mitigation is proposed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the
larger Category 2 wetland along the eastern portion of the site, in addition to
buffer enhancement.
Project Location:
Parcel ID #112305-9065
Site Area:
293,152 square feet (6.72 ac)
of
9
B
Project Location Map
REPORT.doc
City of Renton Department of Can*ity & Economic Development Preliminary Plot Report & Decision
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of April 12, 2011 Page 2 of 12
B. EXHIBITS:
Exhibit 1:
Report to the Nearing Examiner
Exhibit 2:
Zoning Map
Exhibit 3:
Preliminary Plat Plan
Exhibit 4:
Landscape Plan
Exhibit 5:
Aerial Photograph
Exhibit 6:
Preliminary Drainage Report
Exhibit 7:
Critical Areas Report
Exhibit S:
SEPA Determination
Exhibit 9:
SEPA Checklist
Exhibit 10:
DNS -M Advisory Notes
Exhibit 11:
Land Use Master Application
Exhibit 12:
Comment Letters (A, B, C, D, E)
C. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner
1. Owner(s) of Record: 13607 -461st Ave SE
North Bend, WA 98045
2. Zoning Designation: Residential -- 4 du/ac (R-4)
3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density
4. Existing Site Use: Vacant
S. Neighborhood Characteristics:
a. North:
Single Family Residential (R-4 zone)
b. East:
Single Family Residential (R-4 zone)
c. South:
Single Family Residential (R-4 zone)
d. West:
Single Family Residential (R-4 zone)
6. Access:
Lot 1 would gain access from the extended portion of Pasco PI NE. Lots 2-5 would
gain access from two 12 -foot wide access easements extended from the proposed
east/west internal road (NE 7th PI). The remaining lots, lots 6-11, would have
direct access from the proposed east/west internal road (NE 7th Pl).
7. Site Area:
293,152 square feet (6.72 ac)
D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND:
Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date
Comprehensive Plan N/A 5099 11/01/04
Zoning N/A 5100 11/01/04
Annexation N/A 5459 7/05/09
REPORT.doc
City of Renton Department of Comity & Economic Development Preliminary Plot Report & Decision
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA 0-090, PP, ECF
Report of April 12, 2011 Page 3 of 12
E. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities
a_ Water: This site is located in the Water District 90 water service boundary. This site is not located
in the Aquifer Protection Zone.
b. Sewer: There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main Pasco PI NE.
c. Surface/Storm Water: There are existing storm drainage facilities in Pasco PI NE.
2. Streets: There is currently a partially improved public right-of-way along the frontage of the site.
3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department
F APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
b. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
c. Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards
2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts
a. Section 4-3-050: Critical Areas Regulations
3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
a. Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations
b. Section 4-4-130: Tree Cutting and Land Gearing Regulations
4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations
a. Section 4-7-080: Detailed Procedures for Subdivisions
b. Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan —General Requirements and
Minimum Standards
c. Section 4-7-150: Streets—General Requirements and Minimum Standards
d. Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks — General Requirements and Minimum Standards
e. Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots —General Requirements and Minimum Standards
5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria
6. Chapter 11 Definitions
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Land Use Element:
2. Community Design Element:
REPORT.doc
City of Renton Department of Coity & Economic Development Preliminary Plat Report & Decision
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of April 12, 2011 mm Page 4 of 12
H. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. Project Description/ Background
The applicant is requesting a preliminary plat in order to subdivide a 6.72 acre site into 11 single family
lots and tracts for stormwater (Tract B), critical areas (Tract A) and open space (Tracts C & D). The
proposal would result in a density of 2.6 du/ac. The proposed plat would be located in northeast
Renton, on the east side of Nile Ave NE just north of NE 6th St.
The property is in the Residential Low Density (RLD) Comprehensive Plan land use designation and the
Residential 4 (R-4) zoning designation. As part of the Preliminary Plat the applicant is requesting the
clustering of Lots 1-5 due to the alignment of existing roads and critical areas on site. Clustering would
allow the lots to be developed with R-8 development standards, including lot size, width and depth.
The proposed subdivision would result in 11 lots ranging in lot size from 5,563 to 8,706 square feet. Lot
1 would gain access from the extended portion of Pasco PI NE. Lots 2-5 would gain access from two 12 -
foot wide access easements extended from the proposed east/west internal road (NE 7th PI). The
remaining lots, Lots 5-11, would have direct access from the proposed east/west internal road (NE 7th
Ply
There is a Category 2 (Wetland A) and Category 3 (Wetland B) wetland located on the project site.
Wetland A is located along the east side of the site which is heavily forested with deciduous canopy.
Wetland B is located at the west end of the site which is primarily pasture land. The proposed project
includes the filling of Wetland B and its buffer. Mitigation in the form of wetland creation, adjacent to
Wetland A, along with buffer enhancement is proposed.
The overall elevation change within the site is about 12 feet, sloping down from the northern portion of
the site to the west. The slopes throughout the majority of the site are approximately 2.5 percent or
less and range up to 5 percent in the central portion of the site. The project would result in
approximately 800 cubic yards of grading which will be used to create the internal road and storm
detention pond.
The site is vegetated primarily with grass lawns, shrubs and trees. A tree inventory indicates a total of
95 trees on the site, of which 19 trees would remain following development.
The applicant is not proposing the development of Tract D as part of the preliminary plat request in
that there is no access to the tract. The tract would be set aside as open space until such time it could
be developed. The applicant would be required to obtain the appropriate land use entitlements in
order to develop the tract in the future.
2. Environmental Review
Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SERA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended),
on January 31, 2011, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non -Significance
- Mitigated (DNS -M) for the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat. The DNS -M included 3 mitigation measures.
A 14 -day appeal period commenced on February 4, 2011 and ended on February 18, 2011. No appeals
of the threshold determination were been filed.
3. Compliance with ERC Conditions
Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee
(ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated:
REPOR T. doc
City of Renton Department of Comity & Economic Development Preliminary Plat Report & Decision
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of April 12, 2011 Page 5 of 12
1. The applicant shall pay a Parks and Recreation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton
Municipal Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the
Renton Municipal Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
2. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal
Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton
Municipal Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
3. The applicant shall pay a Fire Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the
time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal
Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
4. Staff Review Comments
Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and
address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file,
and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report
and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report.
5. Consistency with Preliminary Plat Criteria
Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following preliminary plat criteria have been
established to assist decision -makers in the review of the plat:
a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Designation
The site is designated Residential Low Density (RLD) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Lands
in the RLD designation are intended to guide development on land appropriate for a range of low
intensity residential where land is either constrained by sensitive areas or where the City has the
opportunity to add larger -lot housing stock, at urban densities of 4 du/net acre, to its inventory. The
proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Element
policies:
Policy LU -143. Within the Residential 4 du/acre zoned area allow a maximum density of 4 units per
net acre to encourage larger lot development and increase the supply of upper income housing
consistent with the City's Housing Element.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Policy LU -146. Interpret development standards to support provision of landscape features as well
as innovative site planning. Criteria should include:
1) Attractive residential streetscapes with landscaped front yards that are visible from the
street;
2) Landscaping, preferably with drought- resistant plant materials;
3) Large caliper street trees;
4) Irrigated landscape planting strips;
5) Low -impact development using landscaped buffers, open spaces, and other pervious
surfaces for surface water runoff; and
6) Significant native tree and vegetation retention and/or replacement.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
REPORT. doc
City of Renton Deportment of Comity & Economic Development Preliminary Plot Report & Decision
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of April 12, 2011 Page 6 of 12
Polity LU -152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be sufficient
to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive fencing, and
sufficient area for maintenance activities.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Objective CD -C. Promote reinvestment in and upgrade of existing residential neighborhoods
through redevelopment of small, underutilized parcels with infill development, modification and
alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to streets and sidewalks to increase property
values.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Policy CD -12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be
encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Policy CD -13. infill development should be reflective of the existing character of established
neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and /or responding to more
urban setbacks, height or lot requirements, infill development should draw on elements of existing
development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of entries and walkways, to
reflect the site planning and scale of existing areas.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation
The subject site is designated R-4 on the City of Renton Zoning Map. However the applicant is
proposing a combination of lots which either conform to the R-4 zoning designation development
standards (Lots 6-11)or lots, within a small lot cluster, which would conform with the R-8 zoning
designation development standards (Lots 1-5). Small lot clusters of up to a maximum of fifty lots are
allowed within the R-4 zone, when at least thirty percent of the site is permanently set aside as
"significant open space." Such open space shall be situated to act as a visual buffer between small lot
clusters and other development in the zone. The applicant is proposing the preservation of Wetland A,
along with its buffer and additional area, in a Native Growth Protection Easement tract (Tract A) as
permanent open space. The tract is located to the east of the proposed clustered lots which would
serve as a visual buffer between the smaller lots and the existing community; specifically, the Maureen
Highlands R-4 subdivision to the east and Tract D should it be developed in the future.
However, the area of Tract A would not result in 30% of the site being permanently set aside (87,618 SF
/ 293,152 SF = 29.88%). While Tract D is proposed for open space it is not proposed to be set aside as
permanent open space and would not count towards the open space requirement. Tract C is also
dedicated as open space, however, the tract is not located in an area which would serve as a visual
buffer between the small lot cluster and other development in the area. In order to comply with the
open space requirement for clustering, additional area is needed between the small lot cluster and the
surrounding R-4 developed properties. Therefore, staff recommends as a condition of approval the
applicant be required to place additional area within Tract A in order to comply with the 30%
permanent open space requirement for clustering. The easement shall be recorded prior to or
concurrently with the Final Plat.
The proposed development would allow for the future construction of eleven new single-family
dwelling units.
Density: The maximum density permitted in the R-4 zone is 4.0 dwelling units per net acre. Net
density is calculated after the deduction of critical areas, areas intended for public right-of-way, and
REPORT.doc
City of Renton Department of Com ity & Economic Development Preliminary Plat Report & Decision
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY T LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of April 12, 2011 Page 7 of 12
private access easements. After subtracting approximately 43,777 square feet for right-of-way
dedications, 1,610 square feet for private access easements, and 64,379 square feet for critical
areas; the net square footage would be 109,766 square feet (4.2 net acres). The eleven lot
proposal would arrive at a net density of 2.6 dwelling units per acre (11 units / 4.2 acres = 2.6
du/ac), which falls within the permitted density range for the R-4 zone.
Lot Dimensions: The minimum lot size permitted in the R-4 zoning designation is 5,000 square feet.
A minimum lot width of 70 feet is required for interior lots and 80 feet for corner lots. Lot depth is
required to be a minimum of 80 feet.
For a small lot cluster development in the R-4 zone, R-8 lot dimension standards would apply.
Therefore the minimum lot size permitted, for Lots 1-5, is 5,000 square feet in area. A minimum lot
width of 50 feet is required for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots. Lot depth is required to be a
minimum of 65 feet. As demonstrated in the table below, all lots meet the requirements for
minimum lot size, depth, and width.
As Proposed
Lot Size
Width
Death
Lot 1
6,907SF
70 feet
96 feet
Lot 2
5,563 SF
74 feet
80 feet
Lot 3
5,909 SF
(5,050 SF net)
72 feet
80 feet
Lot 4
6,264 SF
(5,491 SF net)
64 feet
102 feet
Lot 5
6,326 SF
60 feet
102 feet
Lot 6
8,706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Lot 7
8, 706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Lot 8
8,705 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Lot 9
8, 706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Lot 10
8,706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Lot 11
8,706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Setbacks: Setbacks in the R-4 zone are the following: front yard is 30 feet; a side yard along the
street is 20 feet; interior side yard is 5 feet; the rear yard is 25 feet.
For small lot cluster developments in R-4 zone (Lots 1-5), R-8 setback standards apply. The
required setbacks are as follows: front yard is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an
attached garage; interior side yard is 5 feet; side yard along a street is 15 feet for the primary
structure and 20 feet for an attached garage; and the rear yard is 20 feet.
The proposed lots appear to contain adequate area to provide all the required setback areas.
Compliance with building setback requirements would be reviewed at the time of building permit
review. In order to ensure the appropriate setbacks are applied appropriately at the time of
building permit staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant place on the face of the
plat a covenant noting the R-8 zone setbacks apply on the clustered lots (Lots 1-5) only. The
covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
Building Standards: The R-4 zone permits one residential structure per lot. Each of the proposed
lots would support the construction of one detached unit. Accessory structures are permitted at a
maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size.
Building height in the R-4 zone is limited to 2 stories and 30 feet for primary structures and 15 feet
for detached accessory structures. The allowed building lot coverage for lots over 5,000 5F in size
in the R-4 zone is 35 percent or 2,500 SF, whichever is greater. All dwelling units shall provide
R1=PORT.doc
City of Renton Department of Com nity & Economic Development
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINART
Report of April 12, 2011
Preliminary Plat Report & Decision
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Page 8 of 12
vertical facade modulation at least every 20 horizontal feet, including front, side and rear facades
when visible from a street. The building standards for the proposed lots would be verified at the
time of building permit review.
cj Community Assets
The site is primarily flat and vegetated primarily with shrubs, groundcover and 95 trees of which 76
are proposed for removal. Renton Municipal Code requires that 30% of the trees on site be
retained. Of the 95 trees on site there are 51 trees located within in proposed public roads and/or
access easements. Additionally, 15 trees are located within the proposed Native Growth Protection
Easement. Those trees located within the proposed public roads, access easements, and/or Native
Growth Protection Easements are excluded from the retention rate. Of the 29 trees remaining,
nine trees are required to be retained at the 30% retention rate. A tree inventory submitted by the
applicant indicates five trees would be retained outside of the critical area tract. Therefore the
applicant would be required to plant a total of 24 trees, at a 6:1 ratio, in order to meet the tree
retention requirements of the code. The proposed conceptual landscape plan depicts a total of 66
trees to be planted; of which 32 would have a two-inch caliper and could be used as replacement
trees to meet the retention requirement. As proposed the applicant would comply with the tree
retention requirements of the code. The applicant will be required to comply with protection
measures for retained trees as set forth in RMC 4-4-130H8 during construction.
The City's landscaping regulations require ten feet of on-site landscaping along all public street
frontages, with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways. The landscaping
proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately.
The conceptual landscape plan submitted with the application includes the installation of two
street trees in the front yards of each lot in addition to trees located within the proposed 8 -foot
planter and the stormwater tract. Vegetation proposed includes: Purpleblow maple, Chinese kousa
dogwood, lacquemonti birch, Deodor cedar, American hornbeam and Autumn applause ash trees.
Groundcover consist of kinnickinnick and the applicant is proposing the planting of 51 David's
vibernum shrubs. As proposed the conceptual landscape plan demonstrate compliance with the
landscaping regulations of the code. The applicant is required to submit and have approved a
detailed landscape plan prior to Final Plat recording.
d) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations
Streets: The site is fronted on the west by a partially improved right-of-way of Nile Ave NE and
Pasco PI NE terminates at the southern property boundary of the site. The applicant is proposing
the extension of Pasco PI NE to the north boundary of the site. Pasco PI NE is transected by a
proposed east/west road along the southern boundary of the site, NE 7th PI, which eventually
connects to Nile Ave NE. NE 7`h PI would be constructed with half -street improvements until such
time the property to south developed. Staff received comments from the property owner to the
south and the location of the half -street improvement as it ultimately would require a dedication of
his property in the future. The Development Services Division found the location of the proposed
road is appropriate.
The proposed plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. A
Transportation Impact Fee, per net new average daily trip attributed to the project, with credit
given for the existing single-family residence, was recommended as part of the SEPA review. The
fee would be used to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City's transportation system and
is payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code.
All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton UnderGrounding Ordinance.
If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead
REPORT. doc
City of Renton Department of Cam unity & Economic Development
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY T
Report of April 12, 2011
Preliminary Plot Report & Decision
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Page 9 of 12
utilities shall be placed underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected
and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the plat.
Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat.
Lots: The shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements
of the Subdivision Regulations and the clustering development standards of the R-4 zone- In
addition the proposal allows for reasonable infill of developable land. All 11 lots are rectangular in
shape. In order to maintain the pattern of surrounding development staff recommends the
following condition of approval: a note shall be placed on the face of the plat requiring that the
front yard for Lots 1-5 face toward extended Pasco PI NE. The note shall be recorded concurrently
with the Final Plat. The rear yard for each of the lots is required to be opposite the front yard. All
11 lots appear to have sufficient building area for the development of detached single-family
residences.
e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries
Access: Lot 1 would gain access from the extended portion of Pasco PI NE. Lots 2-5 would gain
access from two 12 -foot wide access easements extended from the proposed east/west internal
road (NE 7th PI). The remaining lots, Lots 6-11, would have direct access from the proposed
east/west internal road (NE 7th PI). In order to limit the number of curb cuts along Pasco PI NE staff
recommends, as a condition of approval, a note be placed on the face of the plat requiring
proposed Lots 2-5 gain access from the proposed access easements extended from NE 7 1 PI. The
note shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat_
Topography: The overall elevation change within the site is approximately 12 feet, sloping from the
upper portion of the property to the west. The slope throughout the majority of the site is less
than 2.5% with the steepest slope at approximately 5% within the center portion of the property.
The applicant has stated approximately 800 cubic yards of material will be removed in order to
construct the proposed stormwater pond. The proposed roadway would be constructed using the
existing material on site. No fill material is anticipated to be brought onto the site.
Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are single-family
residences_ The surrounding properties are designated R-4 either on the City's zoning map. The
proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the area and is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill development. The
neighboring community, to the east, has expressed concerns with potential development on Tract
D and its possible impacts on the enjoyment of their property, the abutting wetland and drainage in
the area. As discussed, the applicant is not proposing development at this time on Tract D.
f) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness)
Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish
services to the proposed development; subject to the condition that the applicant provides Code
required improvements and fees. A Fire Impact Fee, based on new single-family lot with credit
given for the existing single-family residence, was recommended as part of the SEPA review, in
order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is payable to
the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code.
Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use
Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per
single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat
would result in 0.88 additional students (0.44 X 2 new lots = 0.88) to the local schools. It is
anticipated that the Issaquah School District can accommodate any additional students generated
REPORT. doc
City of Renton Department of Com nity & Economic Development
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINAR IT
Report of April 12, 2011
Preliminary Plat Report & Decision
LUA10-090. PP. ECF
Page 10 of 12
by this proposal at the following schools: Apollo Elementary, Maywood Middle School and Liberty
High School. A School Impact Fee, based on new single-family lot, will be required in order to
mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to Issaquah School District_ The fee is payable to the City
as specified by the Renton Municipal Code. Currently the fee is assessed at $3,344.00.
Storm Water: The site lies within the Maplewood Creek sub -basin of the Cedar River/Lake
Washington watershed. Currently the property has two points of discharge. The easterly side of
the property flows to the southeast corner. The westerly side of the property sheet flows to the
west and into a drainage ditch along Nile Ave NE. The ground slopes from the upper portion of the
property to the west and into the ditch along Nile Ave NE. The drainage along Nile Ave NE slopes
from centerline to the existing roadside open ditch to the easterly side. The open ditch continues
to flow to the south from the site to the intersection of NE 4th St.
The applicant submitted a Preliminary Drainage Report prepared by Offe Engineers, PLLC, dated
December 9, 2010. The report states that the proposed project would be required to provide
detention for the impervious areas on site. A stormwater wetpond is proposed on the westerly
side of the property in order to collect and discharge flows per the 2009 icing County Surface Water
Design Manual as amended by the City of Renton. The easterly side of the site is not proposed to
be developed with the exception of Lot 1 which will utilize fill dispersion of runoff continuing into
the existing wetlands and flowing to the southeast. The conceptual plan and report did not
include conceptual sizing calculations for the detention nor did it address the individual lot
treatments. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, staff recommends the applicant be
required to revise the drainage report to include conceptual sizing calculations for the detention
and address the individual lot treatments. The revised plan shall be submitted to and approved by
the Plan Reviewer prior to construction permit approval.
Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: The site is served by the Water District 90. A Certificate of
Water and Availability from Water District 90 was not submitted with the application. Staff
recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant obtain a Certificate of Water Availability
from Water District 90 prior to the approval of any utility construction permits. All plats are
required by City Code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM
within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure_ If the proposed single-family structures
exceed 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two
hydrants within 300 feet of the structure.
Per the City Fire Marshal, Lots 6 - 11 are required to be sprinklered, which requires a minimum f-
inch water meter and not a 4 -inch meter. Therefore staff recommends, as a condition of
preliminary plat approval, the applicant be required to revise the utility plan to depict a 1 -inch
water meter and not a %-inch meter to serve Lots 6 — 11. The revised plan shall be submitted to
and approved by the Plan Reviewer prior to Final Plat recording.
Any existing hydrants to be counted towards the fire flow requirements shall be field verified. The
applicant will show the location and distance of all existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the site.
Existing and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings, if
not already in place.
g) Compliance With Critical Area Regulations
The applicant submitted a Critical Areas Report, prepared by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc. (dated
December 16, 2010), identifying two wetlands located on the subject site; Wetlands A and B (see
Exhibit 4). Wetland A is located along the east side of the site, and is heavily forested with a
deciduous canopy. According to the report Wetland A is classified as a Category 2 wetland.
Category 2 wetlands are required to have a 50 -foot buffer measured from the wetland edge.
Wetland B is located at the west end of the site. According to the report Wetland B is classified as
a Category 3 wetland. Additionally, the report states that this wetland has been highly disturbed
REPORT doc
City of Renton Department of Com nity & Economic Development
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY T
Report of April 12, 2011
Preliminary Plat Report & Decision
I LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Page 11 of 12
due to evidence of past excavation and placement of old concrete, and has been isolated with a
dike/berm along its south side. Category 3 wetlands are required to have a 25 -foot buffer
measured form the wetland edge.
The applicant is proposing access to the site from Nile Ave NE which would require encroachment
into south portion of Wetland B and its buffer. Additionally, due to topography the applicant is
proposing the placement of the required storm facility where Wetland B currently exists.
Therefore, the applicant is proposing to fill Wetland B, approximately 4,200 square feet, and its
buffer, approximately 9,900 square feet, and provide mitigation for its lost functions elsewhere on
site.
A Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Plan was included in the Critical Areas Report. In order to
compensate for the impacts stated above the applicant is proposing the creation of wetland, along
the southwest side of Wetland A, in the amount of 6,300 square feet. The applicant is also
proposing some minor buffer averaging for the western buffer of Wetland A. Enhancement, of
approximately 18,491 square feet, of the buffer associated with Wetland A is proposed in order to
mitigate impacts.
The applicant would be required to comply with RMC 4-3-050 Critical Area regulations in order to
mitigate for any impacts permitted to the wetland and it's buffer. Staff recommends approval of
the buffer averaging proposal subject to conditions. The applicant would be required to submit and
have approved a Final Wetland Mitigation Plan prior to the recording of the Final Plat.
The following conditions of approval are recommended by staff:
1. The applicant shall establish and record a permanent and irrevocable easement on the
property title of the tract containing the critical area and its buffer prior to Final Plat
recording. The protective easement shall be held by current and future property owners,
shall run with the land, and shall prohibit development, alteration, and disturbance within
the easement except for purposes of habitat enhancement as part of an enhancement
project. The enhancement project shall receive prior written approval from the City, and
from any other agency with jurisdiction over such activity.
2. A covenant shall be placed on the tract restricting its separate sale prior to Final Plat
recording. Each abutting lot owner, within the short plat, shall have an undivided interest
in the tract.
3. The common boundary between the native growth protection tract and the abutting land
must be permanently identified. This identification shall include a permanent wood split
rail fence and metal signs on treated or metal posts. The permanent wood split rail fence
and signs shall be installed prior to Final Plat recording.
4. The following note shall appear on the face of the Final Plat and shall also be recorded as a
covenant running with the land on the title of record for all affected lots on the title:
"MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY: All owners of lots created or benefitting from this City
action abutting or including a native growth protection tract are responsible for
maintenance and protection of the tract. Maintenance includes ensuring that no
alterations occur within the tract and that all vegetation remains undisturbed unless the
express written authorization of the City has been received."
1. RECOMMENDATIONS.
Staff recommends approval of the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, as depicted in Exhibit 3, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with the three mitigation measures issued as part of the Determination of
Non -Significance Mitigated, dated February 4, 2011.
REPORT.doc
City of Renton Department of Com nity & Economic Development
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINAR} T
Report of April 12, 2011
Preliminary Plot Report & Decision
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Page 12 of 12
2. The applicant shall be required to place additional area within Tract A in order to comply with the 30%
permanent open space requirement for clustering. The permanent open space easement shall be
recorded prior to or concurrently with the Final Plat.
3. The applicant shall place on the face of the plat a covenant noting the setbacks of the R -S zoning
designation apply on the clustered lots (Lots 1-5) only. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently
with the Final Plat.
4. A note shall be placed on the face of the plat requiring proposed Lots 2-5 gain access from the
proposed access easements extended from NE 7th Pl. The note shall be recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
5. The applicant shall be required to revise the drainage report (Exhibit 6) to include conceptual sizing
calculations for the detention pond and address the individual lot treatments. The revised plan shall be
submitted to and approved by the Engineering Plan Reviewer prior to construction permit approval.
6. The applicant shall be required to revise the utility plan to depict a 1 -inch water meter and not a 3/ -inch
meter to serve Lots 6 — 11. The revised plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering
Plan Reviewer prior to Final Plat recording.
7. The applicant shall establish and record a permanent and irrevocable easement on the property title of
the tract containing the critical area and its buffer prior to Final Plat recording. The protective
easement shall be held by current and future property owners, shall run with the land, and shall
prohibit development, alteration, and disturbance within the easement except for purposes of habitat
enhancement as part of an enhancement project. The enhancement project shall receive prior written
approval from the City, and from any other agency with jurisdiction over such activity.
S. A covenant shall be placed on the tract restricting its separate sale prior to Final Plat recording. Each
abutting lot owner, within the plat, shall have an undivided interest in the tract.
9. The common boundary between the native growth protection tract and the abutting land must be
permanently identified. This identification shall include a permanent wood split rail fence and metal
signs on treated or metal posts. The permanent wood split rail fence and signs shall be installed prior to
Final Plat recording.
10. The following note shall appear on the face of the Final Plat and shall also be recorded as a covenant
running with the land on the title of record for all affected lots on the title: "MAINTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITY: All owners of lots created or benefitting from this City action abutting or including a
native growth protection tract are responsible for maintenance and protection of the tract.
Maintenance includes ensuring that no alterations occur within the tract and that all vegetation
remains undisturbed unless the express written authorization of the City has been received."
REPORT.doc
D7 - 42 T23N R5E W 1/2
i
,rte
w
:
R-4
€
r
E
i
R-4
NEft9
D A i l
EXHIBIT 2
70NING MAP BOOK F7 -14 T23N R5E W 1/2
PW TECHNICAL SERVICES
PRINTED ON 11/13/09
b,Rrs,p.rwm�mh. 0 200 400
Feet
" -r ✓ {Rr_
11 T23N R5E W 112
5311
,rte
w
:
R-4
r
--
s
a
sF ueN �
NE 6N SI
R-4
_
—
R-4
NEft9
D A i l
EXHIBIT 2
70NING MAP BOOK F7 -14 T23N R5E W 1/2
PW TECHNICAL SERVICES
PRINTED ON 11/13/09
b,Rrs,p.rwm�mh. 0 200 400
Feet
" -r ✓ {Rr_
11 T23N R5E W 112
5311
` ` �I-, iriio6rars rrssor�aa f ss
i\
ww
27ur .a w / �G
air �'a:•'�{: \ ,
t -4
1
i u
` � r Id 1
L c 06-
OLYMPUS VILLA
L�a_
NW
1/4, SW 1/4. SEC. 11. T. 23 N., R. 5 E,
W.M.
Awn �oft
ff
e< �sw ac w- rre
CITY OF RENTON, KW COUNTY, W SFNNG'TON
�wim 11 W nat
PAN= ML
},
Wa
R s� m or
\
smug70
1
1
1
ft
s 1
24
10
R�r ��
Rfa�a V�K1� a7 R
/A
TRAM
1. - —ulwwWML \ —
_ R 1 f.7 }•
` ` �I-, iriio6rars rrssor�aa f ss
i\
ww
27ur .a w / �G
air �'a:•'�{: \ ,
t -4
1
i u
` � r Id 1
L c 06-
vti rxaC +i.
iw w,r,r
►L411m carat r
EXHIBIT 3 LIS
N ""Tm I
up r ver' a
w • ani t ��
Mead Gilman & Assoc.
Pmfessional L mnd Surve rm
P.O. BOX 289, W1 KD►vW-LF, WA 98072
As WL Imi MMPC- (VM �W-srn F#X- (1125) 0"100
sad@ 1
w
Awn �oft
ff
e< �sw ac w- rre
- •
�wim 11 W nat
ut
OK parr r.ac
Wa
vti rxaC +i.
iw w,r,r
►L411m carat r
EXHIBIT 3 LIS
N ""Tm I
up r ver' a
w • ani t ��
Mead Gilman & Assoc.
Pmfessional L mnd Surve rm
P.O. BOX 289, W1 KD►vW-LF, WA 98072
As WL Imi MMPC- (VM �W-srn F#X- (1125) 0"100
24
vti rxaC +i.
iw w,r,r
►L411m carat r
EXHIBIT 3 LIS
N ""Tm I
up r ver' a
w • ani t ��
Mead Gilman & Assoc.
Pmfessional L mnd Surve rm
P.O. BOX 289, W1 KD►vW-LF, WA 98072
As WL Imi MMPC- (VM �W-srn F#X- (1125) 0"100
_ — — y — 'as aAV'H.LQ
D� -I,
Q
LI
H
m
H
x
W
nl
ui °p❑�
ALU o
Z -
J
0.
© ti m
LD
ID
en z
0 u_i
OazZ��
F— � P � W;
LLLI CO Z a:
CCV--LLLLCOE
2
O 99
2 zy 1
W
D� -I,
Q
LI
H
m
H
x
W
nl
ui °p❑�
ALU o
Z -
J
0.
© ti m
LD
ID
en z
0 u_i
OazZ��
F— � P � W;
LLLI CO Z a:
CCV--LLLLCOE
0
f2 T
L C) N
I N I I `'•'!
61 caw c m a v
C 3- j O— m EI Ib m m m
= W O v v
A
y 2 ft� [ten (n � � af 0 m
v a� r w in
r `ca m o
J d in 1` U) CC 7 Q
cn
J ❑
,.r L
Lr)
ham!
W
!z�
V
F.
z
w
v2 ti Z
c5�o
EL
s .€ a
E h N
z
6Y E 0 0
E w ❑ °
LL
E w
c r
m
E o
`w p
0
O rn
_ur _
TaE Q
�O ~
m
Da ?,
� o
a �
10 C
N �
CLm
M
W O
t
LL
LL
kq
OD
CD
LO
m
N
04
Q
ccO
c
w
C
D
N
[4 `d
EO Z.
ua U
T
T
x
�
O
.Q
in
m
03
Ll)
c
=
lV
!z�
V
F.
z
w
v2 ti Z
c5�o
EL
s .€ a
E h N
z
6Y E 0 0
E w ❑ °
LL
E w
c r
m
E o
`w p
0
O rn
_ur _
TaE Q
�O ~
m
Da ?,
� o
a �
10 C
N �
CLm
M
W O
t
LL
LL
kq
OD
CD
LO
m
N
04
Q
ccO
c
w
C
D
N
[4 `d
EO Z.
ua U
0
0
0
OLYMPUS VILLA
LUA 10 -XXX
NE 7t" PLACE and NILE AVENUE NE
Renton, Washington
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
December 9, 2010
Prepared for:
Bill Finkbeiner
12011 Bel -Red Road
Suite 206
Bellevue, Washington 98005
(425) 454.7777 office
Submitted/ Prepared by:
OfFe Engineers, PLLC
Attn: Darrell Offe, P.E.
13932 SE 159th Place
Renton, Washington 98058-7832
(425) 260-3412 office
(425) 988-0292 fax
EXHIBIT 6
ire
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,J,
Sewall Wetland Consulting, Inc.
OLYMPUS 'VMLA
CITY OF RENTON
CRITICAL AREAS REPORT
Prepared For:
Bill Finkbeiner
12011 Bel -Red Road
Bellevue 98005
ofl
EXHIBIT 7
December 16, 2010
J0410-144
Sex,vall Wetlaod Consulting, Jnc Phone: 253-859-051s
_17641 Covui�mn 1,Va-v P2 ra%i 253-852-4732
Covington, WA '�,'M42
0 City of ,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
- MITIGATED (DNS -M)
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA10-090, ECF, PP
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner Development
PROJECT NAME: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental
(SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single
family residences.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 122XX 14g`h Avenue SE
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Environmental Review Committee
Department of Community & Economic Development
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under
their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental
impacts identified during the environmental review process.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 18, 2011.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South
Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-
110.6. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (42S)
430-6510.
PUBLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DECISION:
SIGNATURES:
February 4, 2011
January 31, 2001
Mark eterson, dministrator
FiW & Emergency Services
Alex PMsch, Admistrator
Department of Cam unity
Economic Development
EXHIBIT 8
Date
Gregg Zi mem n, dmin s rk_0
Public Warks D partment
Date
,.-A L_ -,--
4/3 �I z0 vt
Terry Higashiyama, Administrator
Community Services Department
Date
Mark eterson, dministrator
FiW & Emergency Services
Alex PMsch, Admistrator
Department of Cam unity
Economic Development
EXHIBIT 8
Date
ify of
r���i Dent.,
OLYMPUS VILLA joo
2w
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ==
Purpose of checklist:
The State Environmental Act (SEPA), chapter 43.210
RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of
a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS)
must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on
the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide
information to help you and the agency identifies impacts from your proposal (and
to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the
agency decide whether an EIS is required.
A. Background
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Olympus Villa
2. Name of applicant: Bill Finkbeiner
3. Address and phone number of applicants and contact person:
Applicant:
Bill Finkheiner
12011 Bel -Red Road
Suite 206
Bellevue, Washington 98005
4. Date checklist prepared: December4, 2010
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton
Contact:
Bill Finkheiner
425-454-7777 (office)
6. Proposed timing or schedule(includinafhasing, if applicable):
Preliminary Approval — Spring 2 1
Construction Drawing Approval — Summer 2011
Construction Start — Summer 2011
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes explain:
Not at this time
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or
will be prepared, directly related to this proposal:
Wetland Assessment prepared by Fd Sewall and Associates as part of the plat
application
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for government approvals of
other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes
Explain:
No
EXHIBIT 9
Pv - LtPaN f2 Q'JE' S[
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNPY City of
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ,f..
DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED
ADVISORY NOTES
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA10-090, ECF, PP
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner Development
PROJECT NAME: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and
Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the
future construction of single family residences.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 122XX 148th Avenue SE
LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental
determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal
process for environmental determinations.
Planning:
1. RMC section 4-4-030.0.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless
otherwise approved by the Development Services Division.
The applicant will be required to establish a Native Growth Protection Tract over that part of the site
encompassing the stream/wetland and buffer area.
3. Sensitive area tract boundaries must be clearly marked with bright orange construction and silt fencing
prior to construction or site clearing activities. The boundaries shall remain marked until construction is
complete.
4. A detailed final plan to mitigate for impacts from any alterations to critical areas will be required to be
reviewed and approved, prior to the approval of the plat engineering plans.
Wntpr-
Per the City Fire Marshal, the preliminary fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm
minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds
3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is
required within 300 -feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm.
Lateral spacing of fire hydrants is predicated on hydrants being located at street intersections (also capable
of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along
the travel route.
ERC Advisory Notes EXHIBIT 10 Page 1 of 2
i 0
2. Per the City Fire Marshal, lots 6 through 11 shall be sprinklered, which requires a minimum 1 -inch water
meter and not a %-inch meter, as called out on the conceptual utility plan.
Sewer;
1. The proposed development is required to install a new sewer main in Pasco Pl NE extended to the north
property line, and a sewer main extended to the west the full length of the roadway. The conceptual
sewer plan does show that as required.
2. This parcel is located in East Renton Special Assessment District (SAD) 002. The fee is $316.80 per new lot
and is paid at the time a construction permit is issued.
3. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on the size of the domestic water meter.
These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued.
Streets:
1. Street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving will be required to be installed on Nile
Ave NE across the full frontage of the parcel being developed.
2. The project needs to provide right-of-way vehicular access from Nile Ave NE, through the plat to Pasco Ave
NE also with curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
3. Street lighting will be required to be installed.
4. All roadways are required to have a minimum of 25 -foot inside and 45 -foot outside turning radius.
5. All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way shall have minimum radius of fifteen feet.
6. All new electrical, phone, and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these
franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to
recording the plat.
Drainage:
1. The Surface Water SDC fees are $1,012 per lot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit
Is Issued.
General
1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals, prepared
according to City of Renton drafting standards, by a licensed Civil Engineer.
2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network.
3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must
be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are
issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards.
ERC Advisory Notes Page 2 of 2
City of Renton.
LAND USE PERMIT
MASTER APPLICATION
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
NAME: Robert Anderson and Gale Miner
ADDRESS: 13607 461' Ave SE
CITY: North Bend ZIP: 98045
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
NAME: Bill Finkbeiner
COMPANY (if applicable):
ADDRESS: 12011 Bel — Red Road, Suite 206
CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98005
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425.454.7777
CONTACT PERSON
NAME: Bill Finkbeiner
COMPANY (if applicable):
ADDRESS:
CITY: ZIP:
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS:
FXHTRTT 7
Renton
I-_'IanlnjNQ Di,,jiSlprl
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Olympus Villa
PROJECTlAD.DRESS(S)lLOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
12xxx 148th Ave NE, Renton 98059
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
1123059065
EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant
PROPOSED LAND USE(S): 11 lot residential plat
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
RLD (Residential Low Density)
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable)
EXISTING ZONING: R4
PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):
SITE AREA (in square feet): 2994W4 ,176 1 /-6.�
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
DEDICATED:
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
1, 6/0 6M FT -
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable) -A.6 unitslacre
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 11
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): t I
C:1Documenrs as Files%Content-Outlook\Z4LW2MVR1Anderson Miner ma_sterapp.doc - I -
0 0
March 1, zoii
Office of Development Services
Rocale Timmons
2oSS South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Dear Rocale Timmons,
I'm writing this letter on behalf of the Windwood Homes neighborhood HOA (Home Owners Association)
in reference to the proposed land use notification we received named "Olympus Villas Preliminary Plat";
land use number LUAio-ogo, EFC, PP. There are two specific concerns we would like to address which I
have outlined in greater detail below:
i) Concern #1_ Use of "Pasco PL NE" for construction traffic
Z) Concern #2: Extending and connecting "Pasco PL NE" to allow traffic flow from proposed
neighborhood
i) Concern #i: We would request that traffic related to construction on the "Olympus Villa Preliminary
Plat" not be permitted access to the Windwood neighborhood unless special exceptions are
required_ Sans no obvious significant economic, traffic related, or ecological benefits to route
traffic through "Pasco PL NE" and the Windwood Homes neighborhood, we request the project
confine itself to using Nile (148th, st) for all traffic for the duration of construction. I've listed the
general concerns in abbreviated bullets; see attached image, and reference 6th and Pasco, and north
end of "Pasco PL NE" attaching to new complex.
a. Traffic volume
b_ Noise
c. Cleanliness
d. Access to street
e. Access to limited parking
f. General safety for children and pets
2) Concern #z: Additionally, the Windwood Homes neighborhood would respectfully ask that the
"Pasco PL NE" street not be connected through to the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat at all, for
vehicle access. Instead we would like to see that access be pedestrian and bicycle access only.
EXHIBIT 12
0 0
Though we do acknowledge a general benefit to Renton Police and Fire, we are very concerned that
extending this street will further increase the speed of and volume of vehicles using" Pasco PL NE",
"6th st", and "Rosario Ave NE" respectively, as well as the rest of the streets in the neighborhood,
exasperating the safety issues existing today.
History: When Morine Highlands (neighborhood east of "Rosario Ave N") opened - 5 years ago, 6th
street was extended from "Rosario Ave NE", to "Shadow Ave". That change significantly impacted
the integrity and safety of 6" street. The number of cars using this street went up three fold.
Additionally, because of the length of the street, without turns, (according to the traffic study
performed by the City of Renton) the speed of the traffic went up by approximately-3o0/a. in the
first year of the new neighborhood access, three pets were killed, two in a one month period on the
intersection of 6th and Pasco. Also, there has been damage to vehicles from being side-swiped by
speeding cars and malicious vandalism to properties along that street. Shortly after the animal
incidents, the problem was reported to the Renton Police department resulting in increased police
awareness and an official traffic study. The end result; after several years of data gathering and
analysis, was to add stop signs in a pattern designed to deter speeding. Though that has helped
some, the stop signs at "6th and "Pasco PL NE" are routinely ignored. The neighborhood has also
deployed "slow down, children playing" signs along Pasco to deter speeders. Because the benefit to
Morine Highlands and the City is so obvious, the Windwood HOA has not asked the city to revoke
this access as we continue to work to resolve this issue_
In summary, looking at a map, it is not clear what inconvenience the residence of Olympus Villa Plat
would experience by using "Nile/148th" as opposed to "Pasco PL NE" as a general means of egress. It
does seem more clear however, that there is very little benefit to using the Windwood Homes and
Morine Highlands streets in terms of efficiency unless the intent was to avoid or ignore the posted
speed and traffic stops.
Thank you very much in advance for your consideration and attention to this matter. If I can provide you
with any additional details, or information; or if you would like to speak in person, please feel free to
contact me at 425-761-5502,
Sincerely,
Kevin Van Flandern
boo Pasco PL NE
Renton, WA g8o59
425-760.-5502
kevinvf@hotmail.com
QE 26th 61
—Los, k
NE
"Req!W"'
-ION
MAIOIA' oi-
'MW
-743 y
rn
a"A
Per
024t t l L
mK
M
%
iii72M, K
AM. V, i CR r,
z
Nt nth st
z CCS
A,-
fuP AT
`�6
Now
Milk-
PC;WNE-4tffSt'jl
-17
AmkA&
�w*wOnflo'd
PC;WNE-4tffSt'jl
-17
0
From the Desk of Kerry M. Curran
January 27`h, 2011
Project # LUA10-090, ECF -PP
Dear Mr. Timmons:
City Of rje�
gjn9 DiV1,,,,',
I have lived at 715 Rosario Place NE for five years. I would like to propose the following for this
development. Given that three deer and a fawn live in the greenbelt and adjacent proposed
development site, these deer need a buffer zone between the greenbelt and other green areas. I
propose a 60 foot green zone for the deer to walk and habitate as diagramed on the proposed site map.
Please take this in to consideration when determining the development of the site. I will make this
proposal again at the March 1". meeting.
Th ,
erry M. Cuv6
425-466-8395
EXHIBIT 12
ib
r- ,
L-A
Pastor/Elder David Clayton Shenk
Awesome Yah Church, Church of Yah in Christ
Church Headquarters
702 Nile Ave NE
Renton, WA 98059
(425)445-6971
Rocale Timmons
City of Renton - Current Planning
Associate Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Tel- (425) 430-7219
Fax: (425) 430-7300
Attn: Rocale Timmons, Project Manager/Associate Planner
0
crry of RENTorl
RECEIVED
W.) 19 90tt
BUILDING 01VISION
Hello, we are concerned about 2 land developments: proposed north of the 702 Nile Ave NE property.
Olympus Villa; and the Pleasant Path, south of the 702 Nile Ave NE property.
First when looking at the road proposed along the northern property line of 702 Nile Ave NE, We see
that it has already been proposed by Bill Finkbeiner to build this road's pavement right up to northern
property line. Usually roads have a space on both sides of the road for sidewalks and planters/grass. This
road's space for sidewalks and plantern rass is proposed to be on the 702 Nile Ave NE property,
impinging 18 feet into it. This will not be allowed by the owner, since the 702 Nile Ave NE property
hasn't been sold to anyone by the owner, nor is there any plan proposed to do so by the owner. The
entire road and the space on both sides of the proposed road need to be completely contained on the
property north of 702 Nile Ave NE, and not any part of it on 702 Nile Ave NE.
Second, on the South East corner of the 702 Nile Ave NE property, it appears from the drawing of
OLYPUS VILLA that the Eastern property line has been impinged upon by the proposed development.
This will not be allowed by the owner of the 702 Nile Ave NE property.
Third, it will be necessary for Robert Johnseine the developer of the Pleasant Path development to build
a road through his own wetland in order to gain access to the buildable land at the back of his property
TRACT -D. And it will be necessary for the city of Renton to approve such an access road if they want
Robert Johnseine to be able to gain access to the buildable portion that is not yet platted TRACT -D. No
access through 702 Nile Ave NE will be allowed. Nor will the City of Renton be allowed to. force such a
road through the 702 Nile Ave NE property at any time in the future.
As Project Manager/Associate Planner for the City of Renton please be advised of the above
encroachments and potential encroachments by current and future road and housing developments,
and plan to correct the errors by prohibiting such encroachments.
Sincerely,
Pastor David Clayton Shenk
1/19/2011 EXHIBIT 12
I
r -
s
L01
J
�a
v
r6
C�ITV ,lr RcrtiT'1tz1
RECEIVE
jj
Lu�oc—l0000crr OLYMPUS VILLA
NW 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 11. T. 23 N.. R. 5 E., W.M.
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
�eeaz w.
fILR= No
$3069348<117LN* POW,
23059pB2
h) 1
897�06Hn4BN 7
A 2 p aARR
10
1 A70! R R rrF !L ,D21'
\ apo Rdt
`
:Ir� » 1 7w
q
%w vilrum
'{ SPS J/I J ! ! 3 l
"n
No- Nt o ce- �,'ar-v , t 'fie y
� 7 fE3tl6$OOE ` d0
fG
� � _ � l •i ,� `-_-_ , ` Jli 11Esoraoss � i� � � Zb
p
1 4
107—
b, RR 4�I r ! 26 S
1 a
1 ,
momd
0 ao im m i uveal oheauer/arn, wm.a
cityof Renton n ,n., avaexr teewo �
Scale 1" = 50' � ;�C?q�ii rC,}' DsviSlOr1 es ,wa ro7a- roaeu d
ma[ MUNE GDOMMaM ers,o, 0" n/.,} 04 A16 etr,t^ uam f+
Ll
p�711Y ,mm . wlr3wr e
aw _ tt .sar r erxrn• w M143 .
L4 M+ sanemrr
o,ae,x ae QSr 91' (IEN,p1 W e,e3 euwr w.t[
2to+. cuvw � w swam u a¢
uts�,oi or st ,� 5a: u,o t�en1
FACE
�.-`e,xer•.1EMead Gilman & Assoc.
ni
W �' r s� Professional Land Surveyors
�. _ „° ,
,a, - a igh nM„ M v a N nc Nmwnr rmx`-_ • P.D- 8OX 289, W000 MLLE• wn 98072
O s, n to w PHONE (423) 486-1252 iNL' (425j 488-8108
0 0
-0= y (P ma � �v
w C' L $ R 41 ° a a w a o
a C quqr V '�'� a 4147
CO y iJ Q YFt_q q j O' +�i 7 lu
ANN
LGgiti w 4�
v t}a o f d c m Uk 12 m aci a
Q.
CL
Y ro 9 42
Lu
g} x
V40
iO
■3 _ E7
Q„ 7iCL a -S 32
+°'�
Ul O (13 �10-C aU 4 M s r .gc 2c
1
y_tiM �ra 6[ Z
CL
in $ A w rn c ,S
CL z
�� gam, j913 'r ±� 6 C
i 7 D o yVt` -C Q
� a j E c a 0. qk —.a y 3 c c
rrI "L � as 0 4 ac o C
o L K
C O Y� y V A Q U ¢moi 4
Q1 O ++ t? �n t Q W
pa s rr as
v S '—" "' L
Q% y d7 ' 40
o A ro u = A i ai c Z or u
iii = cr ° a,v51 ro OCm y '} ;m
o
Vl �,OL
411 w tin
o
IE Ao � �p 8 _ +r m u rn
ro
L V O m Sm "D� � $ � �
0 Ewa c i 3 4m I; +� � 4ts a m E 4� E�
Ln c 41 21g46J z
3�
wcn �$p K
�rw aY U - � � �7 �O = !Z
.ter O ?y i' f3 f w o m U = n a 3
♦x
� � a �,,.r' s � 1�'cl i h -RF s � S �. ' �•'; ""may ' � � i.f���` ��ai�-i2�,�"a. F �� . icy
Y"
yI
SL
y..
.j
y� iJy
0 0
Rocale Timmons EXHIBIT 12
From: Carrie Koperski [ckoperski@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Rocale Timmons; Carrie Koperski
Subject: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, Land Use # LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Mrs. Carrie Koperski
662 Rosario PI NE
Renton, WA 98059
January 24, 2011
Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner
Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Dear Associate Planner Rocale Timmons,
We apologize for submitting our written comments a few days after the January 21, 2011 deadline. Thank you for
notifying our family regarding the proposed construction of new homes in our area. After taking a careful review of the
document you sent, we would like to express the following concerns:
*Please consider drainage implications for adjacent properties. We are currently homeowners in the Maureen Highlands
development, behind the land under consideration. We live on Rosario Place NE, facing the property in question. We are
fortunate in that we are across the street from the green belt and wetlands on the property. We enjoy the view, with the
beautiful trees and singing birds throughout most of the year. We also appreciate that these trees block some of the
intense afternoon sun that hits the front of our house. We are concerned about what removal of the green belt and filling
in of wetlands may due to add to drainage issues for our neighbors. Several of them have had standing water in their
backyards and have had to take significant steps to prevent damage to their foundations/crawl spaces as a result. We
wanted to bring this to your attention as you decide whether to allow the filling of the category three wetland, determine
what type of buffer needs to be provided, and choose what actions are required to mitigate the loss of that wetland.
*Please consider traffic flow/safety as you determine the layout of the development. Currently, the Windwood
neighborhood works hard to encourage drivers to watch out for young children playing ball and riding bikes on our
residential streets. Having Pasco Place extended would likely encourage higher speeds, as we have seen with longer
stretches of road in the Maureen Highlands. Perhaps additional stop signs would help, or providing cul de sacs, etc. We
know many families from our own neighborhood will be tempted to turn right onto Pasco Place and go through the new
development to get onto Nile, both to go to Apollo Elementary and for northbound commutes.
*If Nile needs to be blocked at some point because of the construction project, please consider school bus schedules for
Apollo Elementary. We have had several new homes built in this area in recent months and years, and those closest to
the school can cause delays for students because there is no alternative route.
*Finally, we know the economy is weak and everyone can benefit from the jobs that are generated from new home
construction. However, we need a balanced approach to development. The homes on 128th/4th and Jericho are right on
top of each other, with hardly any yards, parks, playgrounds or green space at all. Our tall evergreens are being cut down
and now all we see to see in many directions is houses and roads. We are thankful in the Maureen Highlands
development that Harbor Homes allotted for adequate yards for each lot, but no park/playground was provided and the
common areas are wetlands. We are less than a mile from an elementary school and so most families here have young
children who need places outdoors to play together. Please consider the need for wooded areas, grassy areas and open
spaces, especially as you take this project into consideration in light of all the other development going on nearby. We
have homes that may not be brand new but are less than 7 years old, some of which have been foreclosed, and they
have not sold for months. Do we need more houses built in this area?
We understand this is private property and we appreciate what the city has done to encourage homeowners on Nile to
make improvements to their homes, especially such steps as junk removal, repairs, etc. We just want to make sure that
this area continues to be a great place for young families, especially because of its proximity to Apollo Elementary School.
1
Thank you for your consideration.
being kept up to date on this case
Mrs. Carrie Koperski
0
Our family is not available to attend the March 1 hearing, but we would appreciate
Thanks again,
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 4th day of April, 2011, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Public
Hearing Notification documents. This information was sent to:
Name
Representing
Parties of Record
See attached
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner
Owners
Bill Finkbeiner - Finkbeiner Development
Contact/Applicant
(Signature of Sender): _
STATE OF WASHINGTON
SS
COUNTY OF KING
� CCC%✓
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker Ih Wr - ZI
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
mentioned in the instrument.
Dated:
Notary Pu lic in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print): ri
My appointment expires: A i ; w� �Zf < c 1.3
purposes
rojec"""'*me
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
P ojec Vu 7b
LUA10-090, ECF, PP
PARTIES OF RECORD
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIM PLAT
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner Bill Finkbeiner Raymond Woo
13607 461st Avenue SE Finkbeiner Development 14404 SE 87th Street
North Bend, WA 98045 12011 Bel -Red Road ste: #206 Newcastle, WA 98059
(owner) Bellevue, WA 98005 (party of record)
tel: (425) 454-7777
Pastor David Shenk
Awesome Yah Church, Church of
Yah in Christ
702 Nile Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Ken Bouvier
721 Rosario Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 761-6853
(party of record)
]on Newman
8070 Langston Road S
Seattle, WA 98178
(party of record)
Dion Coleman
5821 NE 8th Street
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
John Nelson
12865 47th Place
Bellevue, WA 98006
(party of record)
Updated: 04/04/11
eml:
billf@finkbeinerdevelopment.com
(applicant / contact)
Dinah Prather
709 Rosario Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
Jarrod Faehnrich
751 Orcas Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98059
tel; (425) 241-0703
eml: jarrodf@freethought.org
(party of record)
Karen Walter
Watersheds and Land Use Team
Leader
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Fisheries Division
39015 172nd Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092
(party of record)
Michael Krohn
457 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 890-6918
eml: mkrohn129@gmail.com
(party of record)
Robert ]ohnseine
9805 NE 116th Street ste:
#7499
Kirkland, WA 98034
(party of record)
Kerry & Shana Curran
715 Rosario Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
tel: (425) 466-8395
(party of record)
Mina Fletcher
667 Rosario Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
eml: vin_ mina875@msn.com
(party of record)
Kevin VanFlandern
600 Pasco Place NE
Renton, WA 98059
(party of record)
(Page 1 of 1)
0
. i f
PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the
Council Chambers on the seventh floor of Renton City Hall, 1055 South
Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on April 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM to
consider the following petitions:
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
FILE NO. LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Location: 122XX 148" Avenue SE (Parcel #1123059065). Description: The applicant is
requesting Preliminary Plat approval for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11
lots for the future construction of single family residences. The project site is located within
the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING
EXAMINER'S OFFICE AT 425-430-6510
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. I
Denis Law _..
City of,
Mayor �
�
I_
rtf
l
Department of Community and Economic Development
March 16, 2011
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Bill Finkbeiner
Finkbeiner Development
12011 Bel -Red Road ste: #206
Bellevue, WA 98005
SUBJECT: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Dear Mr. Finkbeiner:
This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended February 18, 2011 for the
Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non -Significance -
Mitigated for the above -referenced project.
No appeals were filed on the ERC determination therefore, this decision is final and the
applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures outlined in the Report and
Decision dated January 31, 2011. Also, a Hearing Examiner Public Hearing has been
scheduled for April 19, 2011 at 1.:00 p.m., where Site Plan Conditions may be issued.
The applicant or representatives) of the applicant are required to be present. Enclosed
is a copy of a Draft Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner for your review.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Roc a Timmons
As ciate Planner
Enclosure
cc Robert Anderson & Gale Miner / Owner(s)
Raymond Woo, Pastor David Shenk, Dinah Prather, Robert Johnseine, Ken Bouvier, Jarrod Faehnrich, Kerry
& Shana Curran, John Newman, Karen Walter, Mina Fletcher, Dion Coleman, Michael Krohn, Kevin Van
Flandern, John Nelson / Party(ies) of Record
Renton City Hall . * 1055 South Grady Way a Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
DEPARTMENT OF COMIN ITY city of
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DRAFT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
A. SUMMARYAND PURPOSE OF REQUEST
REPORT DATE.
March 16, 2011
Project Name:
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
Owner:
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner; 13607 -461st Ave 5E; North Bend, WA 95045
Applicant/Contact:
Bill Finkbeiner, Finkbeiner Development; 12011 Bel -Red Rd, Ste #206; Bellevue,
WA 95005
File Number:
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Project Manager:
Rocale Timmons; Associate Planner
Project Summary:
The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval for the subdivision of a 6.72
acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The
project site is located within the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning
designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in area
to 5,706 square feet. Four tracts are proposed for drainage, critical areas and
open space. Access to the lots would be provided via an extension of Pasco PI NE
eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE. The applicant is proposing clustering for
Lots 1-5 due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site whereby R -S
development standards can be applied. The site contains a Category 2 and 3
wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill the smaller Category 3 wetland.
Mitigation is proposed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the
larger Category 2 wetland along the eastern portion of the site, in addition to
buffer enhancement.
Project Location:
Parcel ID #112305-9065
Site Area:
293,152 square feet (6.72 ac)
Project Location Mop
R1= PORT. doc
City of Renton Department of Comoity & Economic Development AdOstrative Short Plat Report & Decision
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of March 16, 2011 Page 2 of 12
LBEXHIBITS:
Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other
material pertinent to the review of the project
Exhibit 2: Zoning Map
Exhibit 3: Preliminary Plat Plan
Exhibit 4: Landscape Plan
Exhibit 5: Aerial Photograph
Exhibit 6: Preliminary Drainage Report
Exhibit 7: Critical Areas Report
Exhibit 8 SEPA Determination
Exhibit 9: Comment Letters
C GENERAL INFORMATION:
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner
1. Owner(s) of Record: 13607 -461st Ave 5E
North Bend, WA 98045
2. Zoning Designation: Residential — 4 du/ac (R-4)
3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density
4. Existing Site Use: Vacant
5. Neighborhood Characteristics:
a. North: Single Family Residential (R-4 zone)
b. East: Single Family Residential (R-4 zone)
c. South: Single Family Residential (R-4 zone)
d. West: Single Family Residential (R,4 zone)
6. Access: Lot 1 would gain access from the extended portion of Pasco PI NE. Lots 2-5 would
gain access from two 12 -foot wide access easements extended from the proposed
east/west internal road (NE 7th PI). The remaining lots, Lots 6-11, would have
direct access from the proposed east/west internal road (NE 71h PI).
7. Site Area: 293,152 square feet (6.72 ac)
D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND:
Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date
Comprehensive Plan N/A 5099 11/01/04
Zoning N/A 5100 11/01/04
Annexation N/A 5459 7/05/09
REPORT.doc
DEPARTMENT OF COMIN&ITY City of s <-
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT r � (j r i
=E -PUBLIC SERVICES:-�
1. Utilities
a. Water: This site is located in the Water District 90 water service boundary. This site is not located
in the Aquifer Protection Zone.
b. Sewer: There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main Pasco PI NE.
c. Surface/Storm Water: There are existing storm drainage facilities in Pasco PI NE.
2. Streets: There is currently a partially improved public right-of-way along the frontage of the site.
3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
b_ Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
c. Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards
2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts
a. Section 4-3-050: Critical Areas Regulations
3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
a. Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations
b. Section 4-4-130: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations
4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
S. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations
a. Section 4-7-080: Detailed Procedures for Subdivisions
b. Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan —General Requirements and
Minimum Standards
c. Section 4-7-150: Streets — General Requirements and Minimum Standards
d. Section 4-7-160: Residential Blocks — General Requirements and Minimum Standards
e. Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots—General Requirements and Minimum Standards
S. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria
6. Chapter 11 Definitions
Project Location Map
REPORT. doc
City of Renton Department of Comity & Economic Development Adlestrative Short Plat Report & Decision
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of March 16, 2011 Page 4 of 12
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Land Use Element:
2. Community Design Element:
H. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. Project Description/Background
The applicant is requesting a preliminary plat in order to subdivide a 6.72 acre site into 11 single family
lots and tracts for stormwater (Tract B), critical areas (Tract A) and open space (Tracts C & D). The
proposal would result in a density of 2.6 du/ac. The proposed plat would be located in northeast
Renton, on the east side of Nile Ave NE just north of NE 6th St.
The property is in the Residential Low Density (RLD) Comprehensive Plan land use designation and the
Residential 4 (R-4) zoning designation. As part of the Preliminary Plat the applicant is requesting the
clustering of Lots 1-5 due to the alignment of existing roads and critical areas on site. Clustering would
allow the lots to be developed with R-8 development standards, including lot size, width and depth.
The proposed subdivision would result in 11 lots ranging in lot size from 5,563 to 8,706 square feet_ Lot
1 would gain access from the extended portion of Pasco PI NE. Lots 2-5 would gain access from two 12 -
foot wide access easements extended from the proposed east/west internal road (NE 7th PI). The
remaining lots, Lots 6-11, would have direct access from the proposed east/west internal road (NE 7th
PI).
There is a Category 2 (Wetland A) and Category 3 (Wetland B) wetland located on the project site.
Wetland A is located along the east side of the site which is heavily forested with deciduous canopy.
Wetland B is located at the west end of the site which is primarily pasture land. The proposed project
includes the filling of Wetland B and its buffer. Mitigation in the form of wetland creation, adjacent to
Wetland A, along with buffer enhancement is proposed.
The overall elevation change within the site is about 12 feet, sloping down from the northern portion of
the site to the west. The slopes throughout the majority of the site are approximately 2.5 percent or
less and range up to 5 percent in the central portion of the site. The project would result in
approximately 800 cubic yards of grading which will be used to create the internal road and storm
detention pond.
The site is vegetated primarily with grass lawns, shrubs and trees. A tree inventory indicates a total of
95 trees on the site, of which 19 trees would remain following development.
The applicant is not proposing the development of Tract D as part of the preliminary plat request in
that there is no access to the tract. The tract would be set aside as open space until such time it could
be developed. The applicant would be required to obtain the appropriate land use entitlements in
order to develop the tract in the future.
2. Environmental Review
Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended),
on January 31, 2011, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non -Significance
- Mitigated (DNS -M) for the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat. The DNS -M included 3 mitigation measures.
A 14 -day appeal period commenced on February 4, 2011 and ended on February 18, 2011. No appeals
of the threshold determination were been filed.
REPORT. d oc
City of Renton Department of Comity & Economic Development Ad-trative Short Plot Report & Decision
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of March 16, 2011 Page 5 of 12
3. Compliance with ERC Conditions
Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee
(ERC) issued the following mitigation measure with the Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated:
1. The applicant shall pay a Parks and Recreation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton
Municipal Code at the time of payment_ The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the
Renton Municipal Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
2. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal
Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton
Municipal Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
3. The applicant shall pay a Fire Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the
time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal
Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
4. Staff Review Comments
Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and
address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file,
and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report
and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report.
5. Consistency with Preliminary Plat Criteria
Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following preliminary plat criteria have been
established to assist decision=makers in the review of the plat:
a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Designation
The site is designated Residential Low Density (RLD) on the Comprehensive Pian Land Use Map. Lands
in the RLD designation are intended to guide development on land appropriate for a range of low
intensity residential where land is either constrained by sensitive areas or where the City has the
opportunity to add larger -lot housing stock, at urban densities of 4 du/net acre, to its inventory. The
proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Element
policies:
Policy LU -143. Within the Residential 4 du/acre zoned area allow a maximum density of 4 units per
net acre to encourage larger lot development and increase the supply of upper income housing
consistent with the City's Housing Element.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Policy LU -146. Interpret development standards to support provision of landscape features as well
as innovative site planning. Criteria should include:
1) Attractive residential streetscapes with landscaped front yards that are visible from the
street;
2) Landscaping, preferably with drought- resistant plant materials,
3) Large caliper street trees;
4) Irrigated landscape planting strips,
5) Low -impact development using landscaped buffers, open spaces, and other pervious
surfaces for surface water runoff; and
6) Significant native tree and vegetation retention and/or replacement.
REPORT.doc
City of Renton Department of Corn0ity & Economic Development Ad estrative Short Plat Report & Decision
OLYMPUS ViLLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of March 16, 2011 Page 6 of 12
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Policy U1-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be sufficient
to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive fencing, and
sufficient area for maintenance activities.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Objective CD -C. Promote reinvestment in and upgrade of existing residential neighborhoods
through redevelopment of small, underutilized parcels with infill development, modification and
alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to streets and sidewalks to increase property
values.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Policy CD -12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be
encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
Policy CD -13. Infill development should be reflective of the existing character of established
neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and /or responding to more
urban setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing
development such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of entries and walkways, to
reflect the site plonning and scale of existing areas.
® Policy Objective Met ❑ Not Met
b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation
The subject site is designated R-4 on the City of Renton Zoning Map however the applicant is proposing
a combination of lots which either conform to the R-4 zoning designation development standards (Lots
6-11)or small lot cluster of which the lots would conform with the R-8 zoning designation development
standards (Lots 1-5). Small lot clusters of up to a maximum of fifty lots are allowed within the R-4 zone,
when at least thirty percent of the site is permanently set aside as "significant open space." Such open
space shall be situated to act as a visual buffer between small lot clusters and other development in the
zone. The applicant is proposing the preservation of Wetland A, along with its buffer and additional
area, in a Native Growth Protection Easement tract (Tract A) as permanent open space. The tract is
located to the east of the proposed clustered lots which would serve as a visual buffer between the
smaller lots and the existing community; specifically, the Maureen Highlands R-4 subdivision to the east
and possible development within Tract D_
However, the area of Tract A would not result in 30% of the site being permanently set aside (87,618 SF
/ 293,152 SF = 29.88%). While Tract D is proposed for open space it is not proposed to be set aside as
permanent open space and would not counted towards the open space requirement. Tract C is also
dedicated as open space, however, the tract is not located in an area which would serve as a visual
buffer between the small lot cluster and other development in the area. In order to comply with the
open space requirement for clustering, additional area is needed. Therefore, staff recommends as a
condition of approval the applicant be required to place additional area within Tract A in order to
comply with the 30% permanent open space requirement for clustering. The easement shall be
recorded prior to or concurrently with the Final Plat.
The proposed development would allow for the future construction of eleven new single-family
dwelling units.
Density: The maximum density permitted in the R-4 zone is 4.0 dwelling units per net acre. Net
density is calculated after the deduction of critical areas, areas intended for public right-of-way, and
REPORT. d oc
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARf*T
Report of March 16, 2011
REPORT. doc
istrative Short Plot Report & Decision
I LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Page 7 of 12
private access easements. After subtracting approximately 43,777 square feet for right-of-way
dedications, 1,610 square feet for private access easements, and 64,379 square feet for critical
areas; the net square footage would be 109,766 square feet (4.2 net acres). The eleven lot
proposal would arrive at a net density of 2.6 dwelling units per acre (11 units / 4.2 acres = 2.6
du/ac), which falls within the permitted density range for the R-4 zone.
Lot Dimensions: The minimum lot size permitted in the R-4 zoning designation is 5,000 square feet.
A minimum lot width of 70 feet is required for interior lots and 80 feet for corner lots. Lot depth is
required to be a minimum of 80 feet.
For small a lot cluster development in the R-4 zone, R-8 lot dimension standards would apply.
Therefore the minimum lot size permitted, for Lots 1-5, is 5,000 square feet in area. A minimum lot
width of 50 feet is required for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots. Lot depth is required to be a
minimum of 65 feet. As demonstrated in the table below, all lots meet the requirements for
minimum lot size, depth, and width.
As Proposed
Lot Size
Width
Depth
Lot 1
6,907 SF
70 feet
96 feet
Lot 2
5,563 SF
74 feet
80 feet
Lot 3
5,909 SF
(5,050 SF net)
72 feet
80 feet
Lot 4
6,264 SF
(5,491 SF nett
64 feet
102 feet
Lot S
6,326 SF
60 feet
102 feet
Lot 6
8, 706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Lot 7
8,706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Lot 8
8, 706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Lot 9
8,706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Lot 10
8,706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Lot 11
8,706 SF
70 feet
124 feet
Setbacks: Setbacks in the R-4 zone are the following: front yard is 30 feet; a side yard along the
street is 20 feet; interior side yard is 5 feet; the rear yard is 25 feet.
For small lot cluster developments in R-4 zone (Lots 1-5), R-8 setback standards apply. The
required setbacks are as follows: front yard is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an
attached garage; interior side yard is 5 feet; side yard along a street is 15 feet for the primary
structure and 20 feet for an attached garage; and the rear yard is 20 feet.
The proposed lots appear to contain adequate area to provide all the required setback areas.
Compliance with building setback requirements would be reviewed at the time of building permit
review. In order to ensure the appropriate setbacks are applied appropriately at the time of
building permit staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant place on the face of the
plat a covenant noting the R-8 zone setbacks apply on the clustered lots (Lots 1-5). The covenant
shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
Building Standards: The R-4 zone permits one residential structure per lot. Each of the proposed
lots would support the construction of one detached unit. Accessory structures are permitted at a
maximum number of two per lot at 720 square feet each, or one per lot at 1,000 square feet in size.
Building height in the R-4 zone is limited to 2 stories and 30 feet for primary structures and 15 feet
for detached accessory structures. The allowed building lot coverage for lots over 5,000 SF in size
in the R-4 zone is 35 percent or 2,500 SF, whichever is greater. All dwelling units shall provide
City of Renton Department of Com
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY)
Report of March 16, 2011
T
& Economic Development
istrative Short Plat Report & Decision
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Page 8 of 12
vertical facade modulation at least every 20 horizontal feet, including front, side and rear facades
when visible from a street. The building standards for the proposed lots would be verified at the
time of building permit review.
cj Community Assets
The site is primarily flat and vegetated primarily with shrubs, groundcover and 95 trees of which 76
are proposed for removal. Renton Municipal Code requires that 30% of the trees on site be
retained. Of the 95 trees on site there are 51 trees located within in proposed public roads and/or
access easements. Additionally, 15 trees are located within the proposed Native Growth Protection
Easement. Those trees located within the proposed public roads, access easements, and/or Native
Growth Protection Easements are excluded from the retention rate. Of the 29 trees remaining,
nine trees are required to be retained at the 30% retention rate. A tree inventory submitted by the
applicant indicates five trees would be retained outside of the critical area tract. Therefore the
applicant would be required to plant a total of 24 trees, at a 6:1 ratio, in order to meet the tree
retention requirements of the code. The proposed conceptual landscape plan depicts a total of 66
trees to be planted; of which 32 would have a two-inch caliper and could be used as replacement
trees to meet the retention requirement. As proposed the applicant would comply with the tree
retention requirements of the code. The applicant will be required to comply with protection
measures for retained trees as set forth in RMC 4-4-130H8 during construction.
The City's landscaping regulations require ten feet of on-site landscaping along all public street
frontages, with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways. The landscaping
proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately.
The conceptual landscape plan submitted with the application includes the installation of two
street trees in the front yards of each lot in addition to trees located within the proposed 8 -foot
planter and the stormwater tract. Vegetation proposed includes: Purpleblow maple, Chinese kousa
dogwood, Jacquemonti birch, Deodor cedar, American hornbeam and Autumn applause ash trees.
Groundcover consist of kinnickinnick and the applicant is proposing the planting of 51 David's
vibernum shrubs. As proposed the conceptual landscape plan demonstrate compliance with the
landscaping regulations of the code. The applicant is required to submit and have approved a
detailed landscape plan prior to Final Plat recording.
d) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations
Streets: The site is fronted on the west by a partially improved right-of-way of Nile Ave NE and
Pasco PI NE terminates at the southern property boundary of the site. The applicant is proposing
the extension of Pasco PI NE to the north boundary of the site. Pasco PI NE is transected by a
proposed east/west road along the southern boundary of the site, NE 7th PI, which eventually
connects to Nile Ave NE. NE 7th PI would be constructed with half -street improvements until such
time the property to south developed. Staff received comments from the property owner to the
south and the location of the half -street improvement as it ultimately would require a dedication of
his property in the future. The Development Services Division found the location of the proposed
road is appropriate.
The proposed plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. A
Transportation Impact Fee, per net new average daily trip attributed to the project, with credit
given for the existing single-family residence, was recommended as part of the SEPA review. The
fee would be used to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City's transportation system and
is payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code.
All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton UnderGrounding Ordinance.
If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead
REPORT. doc
City of Renton Department of Comi
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY]
Report of March 16, 2011
T
& Economic Development A
istrative Short Plat Report & Decision
I LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Page 9 of 12
utilities shall be placed underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected
and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording of the plat.
Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat.
Lots: The shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements
of the Subdivision Regulations and the clustering development standards of the R-4 zone. In
addition the proposal allows for reasonable infill of developable land. All 11 lots are rectangular in
shape. In order to maintain the pattern of surrounding development staff recommends the
following condition of approval: a note shall be placed on the face of the plat requiring that the
front yard for Lots 1-5 face toward extended Pasco PI NE. The note shall be recorded concurrently
with the Final Plat. The rear yard for each of the lots is required to be opposite the front yard. All
11 lots appear to have sufficient building area for the development of detached single-family
residences.
e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries
Access: Lot 1 would gain access from the extended portion of Pasco PI NE. Lots 2-5 would gain
access from two 12 -foot wide access easements extended from the proposed east/west internal
road (NE 7th PI). The remaining lots, Lots 6-11, would have direct access from the proposed
east/west internal road (NE 7th PI). In order to limit the number of curb cuts along Pasco PI NE staff
recommends, as a condition of approval, a note be placed on the face of the plat requiring
proposed Lots 2-5 gain access from the proposed access easements extended from NE 7th PI. The
note shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
Topography: The overall elevation change within the site is approximately 12 feet, sloping from the
upper portion of the property to the west. The slope throughout the majority of the site is less
than 2.5% with the steepest slope at approximately 5% within the center portion of the property.
The applicant has stated approximately 800 cubic yards of material will be removed in order to
construct the proposed stormwater pond. The proposed roadway would be constructed using the
existing material on site. No fill material is anticipated to be brought onto the site.
Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are single-family
residences. The surrounding properties are designated R-4 either on the City's zoning map. The
proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the area and is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill development. The
neighboring community, to the east, has expressed concerns with potential development on Tract
D and its possible impacts on the enjoyment of their property, the abutting wetland and drainage in
the area. As discussed, the applicant is not proposing development at this time on Tract D.
f) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness)
Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish
services to the proposed development; subject to the condition that the applicant provides Code
required improvements and fees. A Fire Impact Fee, based on new single-family lot with credit
given for the existing single-family residence, was recommended as part of the SEPA review, in
order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is payable to
the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code.
Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use
Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students per
single-family residential dwelling. Based on the student generation factor, the proposed short plat
would result in 0.88 additional students (0.44 X 2 new lots = 0.88) to the local schools. It is
REPORT. doc
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARYST
Report of March 16, 2011
istrative Short Plat Report & Decision
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Page 10 of 12
anticipated that the Issaquah School District can accommodate any additional students generated
by this proposal at the following schools: Apollo Elementary, Maywood Middle School and Liberty
High School. A School Impact Fee, based on new single-family lot, will be required in order to
mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to Issaquah School District. The fee is payable to the City
as specified by the Renton Municipal Code_ Currently the fee is assessed at $3,344.00
Storm Water: The site lies within the Maplewood Creek sub -basin of the Cedar River/Lake
Washington watershed. Currently the property has two points of discharge. The easterly side of
the property flows to the southeast corner. The westerly side of the property sheet flows to the
west and into a drainage ditch along Nile Ave NE. The ground slopes from the upper portion of the
property to the west and into the ditch along Nile Ave NE. The drainage along Nile Ave NE slopes
from centerline to the existing roadside open ditch to the easterly side. The open ditch continues
to flow to the south from the site to the intersection of NE 4th St.
The applicant submitted a Preliminary Drainage Report prepared by Offe Engineers, PLLC, dated
December 9, 2010. The report states that the proposed project would be required to provide
detention for the impervious areas on site. A stormwater wetpond is proposed on the westerly
side of the property in order to collect and discharge flows per the 2009 King County Surface Water
Design Manual as amended by the City of Renton. The easterly side of the site is not proposed to
be developed with the exception of Lot 1 which will utilize fill dispersion of runoff continuing into
the existing wetlands and flowing to the southeast. The conceptual plan and report did not
include conceptual sizing calculations for the detention nor did it address the individual lot
treatments. As a condition of preliminary plat approval, staff recommends the applicant be
required to revise the drainage report to include conceptual sizing calculations for the detention
and address the individual lot treatments. The revised plan shall be submitted to and approved by
the Plan Reviewer prior to construction permit approval.
Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: The site is served by the Water District 90. A Certificate of
Water and Availability from Water District 90 was not submitted with the application. Staff
recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant obtain a Certificate of Water Availability
from Water District 90 prior to the approval of any utility construction permits. All plats are
required by City Code to provide a fire hydrant with a minimum fire flow requirement of 1,000 GPM
within 300 feet of any proposed single-family structure. If the proposed single-family structures
exceed 3,600 square feet, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two
hydrants within 300 feet of the structure.
Per the City Fire Marshal, Lots 6 - 11 are required to be sprinklered, which requires a minimum f-
inch water meter and not a %-inch meter. Therefore staff recommends, as a condition of
preliminary plat approval, the applicant be required to revise the utility plan to depict a 1 -inch
water meter and not a %-inch meter to serve Lots 6 — 11. The revised plan shall be submitted to
and approved by the Plan Reviewer prior to Final Plat recording.
Any existing hydrants to be counted towards the fire flow requirements shall be field verified. The
applicant will show the location and distance of all existing fire hydrants within 300 feet of the site.
Existing and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings, if
not already in place.
g) Compliance With Critical Area Regulations
The applicant submitted a Critical Areas Report, prepared by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc. (dated
December 16, 2010), identifying two wetlands located on the subject site; Wetlands A and B (see
Exhibit 4). Wetland A is located along the east side of the site, and is heavily forested with a
deciduous canopy. According to the report Wetland A is classified as a Category 2 wetland.
Category 2 wetlands are required to have a 50 -foot buffer measured from the wetland edge.
Wetland B is located at the west end of the site. According to the report Wetland B is classified as
REPORT.doc
City of Renton Deportment of Community & Economic Development .4d+
OLYMPUS VILLA PRFLIMINARIbT I
Report of March 16, 2011
REPORT. doc
istrative Short Plot Report & Decision
LUA30-030, PP, ECF
Page it of 12
a Category 3 wetland. Additionally, the report states that this wetland has been highly disturbed
due to evidence of past excavation and placement of old concrete, and has been isolated with a
dike/berm along its south side. Category 3 wetlands are required to have a 25 -foot buffer
measured form the wetland edge.
The applicant is proposing access to the site from Nile Ave NE which would require encroachment
into south portion of Wetland B and its buffer. Additionally, due to topography the applicant is
proposing the placement of the required storm facility where Wetland B currently exists.
Therefore, the applicant is proposing to fill Wetland B, approximately 4,200 square feet, and its
buffer, approximately 9,900 square feet, and provide mitigation for its lost functions elsewhere on
site.
A Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Plan was included in the Critical Areas Report. In order to
compensate for the impacts stated above the applicant is proposing the creation of wetland, along
the southwest side of Wetland A, in the amount of 6,300 square feet. The applicant is also
proposing some minor buffer averaging for the western buffer of Wetland A. Enhancement, of
approximately 18,491 square feet, of the buffer associated with Wetland A is proposed in order to
mitigate impacts.
The applicant would be required to comply with IZMC 4-3-050 Critical Area regulations in order to
mitigate for any impacts permitted to the wetland and it's buffer. Staff recommends approval of
the buffer averaging proposal subject to conditions. The applicant would be required to submit and
have approved a Final Wetland Mitigation Plan prior to the recording of the Final Plat.
The following conditions of approval are recommended by staff:
1. The applicant shall establish and record a permanent and irrevocable easement on the
property title of the tract containing the critical area and its buffer prior to Final Plat
recording. The protective easement shall be held by current and future property owners,
shall run with the land, and shall prohibit development, alteration, and disturbance within
the easement except for purposes of habitat enhancement as part of an enhancement
project. The enhancement project shall receive prior written approval from the City, and
from any other agency with jurisdiction over such activity.
2. A covenant shall be placed on the tract restricting its separate sale prior to Final Plat
recording. Each abutting lot owner, within the short plat, shall have an undivided interest
in the tract.
3. The common boundary between the native growth protection tract and the abutting land
must be permanently identified. This identification shall include a permanent wood split
rail fence and metal signs on treated or metal posts. The permanent wood split rail fence
and signs shall be installed prior to Final Plat recording.
4. The following note shall appear on the face of the Final Plat and shall also be recorded as a
covenant running with the land on the title of record for all affected lots on the title:
"MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY: All owners of lots created or benefitting from this City
action abutting or including a native growth protection tract are responsible for
maintenance and protection of the tract. Maintenance includes ensuring that no
alterations occur within the tract and that all vegetation remains undisturbed unless the
express written authorization of the City has been received."
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development A
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARVftT
Report of March 16, 2011
rative Short Plat Report & Decision
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Page 12 of 12
!. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, Project File No. LUA10-090, PP, ECF subject
to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with the three mitigation measures issued as part of the Determination of
Non -Significance Mitigated, dated February 4, 2011.
2. The applicant shall be required to place additional area within Tract A in order to comply with the 30%
permanent open space requirement for clustering. The permanent open space easement shall be
recorded prior to or concurrently with the Final Plat.
3. The applicant shall place on the face of the plat a covenant noting the R-8 zone setbacks apply on the
clustered lots (Lots 1-5). The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat.
4. A note shall be placed on the face of the plat requiring proposed Lots 2-5 gain access from the
proposed access easements extended from NE 7 1 PI. The note shall be recorded concurrently with the
Final Plat.
5_ The applicant shall be required to revise the drainage report to include conceptual sizing calculations
for the detention pond and address the individual lot treatments. The revised plan shall be submitted
to and approved by the Engineering Plan Reviewer prior to construction permit approval.
6. The applicant shall be required to revise the utility plan to depict a 1 -inch water meter and not a %-inch
meter to serve Lots 6 — 11. The revised plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering
Plan Reviewer prior to Final Plat recording_
7_ The applicant shall establish and record a permanent and irrevocable easement on the property title of
the tract containing the critical area and its buffer prior to Final Plat recording. The protective
easement shall be held by current and future property owners, shall run with the land, and shall
prohibit development, alteration, and disturbance within the easement except for purposes of habitat
enhancement as part of an enhancement project. The enhancement project shall receive prior written
approval from the City, and from any other agency with jurisdiction over such activity_
8. A covenant shall be placed on the tract restricting its separate sale prior to Final Plat recording. Each
abutting lot owner, within the plat, shall have an undivided interest in the tract.
9. The common boundary between the native growth protection tract and the abutting land must be
permanently identified. This identification shall include a permanent wood split rail fence and metal
signs on treated or metal posts. The permanent wood split rail fence and signs shall be installed prior to
Final Plat recording.
10. The following note shall appear on the face of the Final Plat and shall also be recorded as a covenant
running with the land on the title of record for all affected lots on the title: "MAINTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITY: All owners of lots created or benefitting from this City action abutting or including a
native growth protection tract are responsible for maintenance and protection of the tract.
Maintenance includes ensuring that no alterations occur within the tract and that all vegetation
remains undisturbed unless the express written authorization of the City has been received."
REPORT. doc
n "7 n 1 'r'? I XT D z -v W 111
ZONING MAP BOOK F7 -14 T23N R5E W 1/2
PW TECHNICAL SERVICES
PRINTED ON 11/13/09
ins k a yaPhk rprneriurbn mt
Ni mertl brumvrrwury, ardbheea on
rna her in6moem xw4 W u o11M dee shown.
m e.c a•:a.�aa.b4 w.aa..wm��+s 6 200 400
City of _ Feet
[ r't 1:4.800 16
E7
11 T23N R5E W 112
5311
�I
OLYMPUSVILLA
W 1/4. SW 1/4. SEC, 11. T. 23 N.. R. 5 E., WAL
CRY OF poffON. Kw COMM. W "
Ila
\ ` f
AL km ft
i
.4a
YWIN IL�
M
_ » R
TRAMC �,— PWL Milk�-
-(OFCW ?PAC0r
BAN 16
f,....
� _ `. , `,_•----- � _ Jim uarMw42 ! ►r, n:.. I �' .m
24
dr
Nor
pm
� r' - :� v v • J I ' �
1 � •:�_Sh�''"�-tip• � r � � 1
s 1
1
..,,;,....�.� w.. EXHIBIT 3 :..:`:.
�s ■ wWW r
w s rrirr s
•�•• ~ � ,' �(,3sr Mead G#mw & Assoc.
� ,� .�� .� P.o. BOX 2W,rrpaoMrnuF. +� six
0 - - — i RIN& (420) NO -I= "K (4W 40"1
-- -----383A4'' -
I
P
U
En
MW
1—
m
x
W
L
aw
S2
J
�0.
❑ [j7
Z C3
c
73
❑ LLI
paz
LNR
aLLJ
: 'It
B
µ
jEiE¢YI
i
i
I
P
U
En
MW
1—
m
x
W
L
aw
S2
J
�0.
❑ [j7
Z C3
c
73
❑ LLI
paz
LNR
aLLJ
: 'It
r
• �q15 ' j' L � r N m .
} N
n C 67 l6 yY -
L C
N Z N m a m E o m W
.• 1 N V N t N -p N mm Q— Y Y f 2 R' f15 Ul H Ir 0 m OcuU
O
d_j d (A 2 U7 d d d o
'-X Uzi J C? ❑ i Z w
_ 1 F. Vii. c 9 d z
f � a� m S ,,1 LD
w
LU
OR
LL
"W
Eom
17
, kAz,
:r
jusarto I
uj
L N
� -. f f a � �' � �„• �.f� A -'tit � - c ` � _
v
CLLL
Cd
Ln
75
Cl
h. n ,
{ i
cn
- _ � .. ,�� ani y%8J'1 " " � - J:t� a.��.• �fj;t, - "`
1 ..4 t Y
P
9
OLYMPUS VILLA
LUA 10-xxx
NE 7"' PLACE and NILE AVENUE NE
Renton, Washington
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
December 9, 2010
Prepared for:
Bill Finkbeiner
12011 Bel -Red Road
Suite 206
Bellevue, Washington 98005
(425) 454-7777 office
Submitted/ Prepared by:
Offe Engineers, PLLC
Attn. Darrell Offe, P.E.
13932 SE 159"' Place
Renton, Washington 98058-7832
(425) 260-3412 office
(425) 988-0292 fpx
EXHIBIT 6
city Of t
R
r1t.,
I./;Si
Of)
�D
V(0
OLYMPUS VILLA
CITY OF RENTON
CRITICAL AREAS REPORT
r, an
L�,��nsson
SA i
Prepared For:
Bill Finkbeiner
12011 Bel -Red Road
Bellevue 48005
EXHIBIT 7
December 16, 2010
Job#10-144
5e�,vall Wtgland C'onsultuig, Inc Phone: 253-859-055
27641 Covumton Way SF. IQ Vin,.. 253-852-4732
Covington. WA
0
illilillililljllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D "City Of (� 1
AND ECO
NOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
- MITIGATED (DNS -M)
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA10-090, ECF, PP
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner Development
PROJECT NAME: Olympus villa Preliminary Plat
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental
(SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single
family residences.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 122XX 148t' Avenue SE
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Environmental Review Committee
Department of Community & Economic Development
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C•030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under
their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental
impacts identified during the environmental review process.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 18, 2011.
...A
Pea must be filed in writin together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South
a:d g
Y Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-
'' Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)
X10.
DATE: February 4, 2011
ilN: January 31, 2001
minr to Mark eter son, dministrator
Date Date
t Fi & Emergency Services
7_6 �1 t 3ti
strator Aex P sc , Admi 'strator
ent Date Department of Com unity & Ite
-; Economic Development
is
} EXHIBIT 8
0
March 1, 2011
Office of Development Services
Rocale Timmons
io55 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Dear Rocale Timmons,
LJ
I'm writing this letter on behalf of the Windwood Homes neighborhood HOA (Home Owners Association)
in reference to the proposed land use notification we received named "Olympus Villas Preliminary Plat";
land use number LUAto-ogo, EFC, PP. There are two specific concerns we would like to address which 1
have outlined in greater detail below:
1) Concern #1: Use of "Pasco PL NE" for construction traffic
2) Concern #2: Extending and connecting "Pasco PL NE" to allow traffic flow from proposed
neighborhood
1) Concern #i: We would request that traffic related to construction on the "Olympus Villa Preliminary
Plat" not be permitted access to the Windwood neighborhood unless special exceptions are
required. Sans no obvious significant economic, traffic related, or ecological benefits to route
traffic through "Pasco PL NE" and the Windwood Homes neighborhood, we request the project
confine itself to using Nile (148t' st) for all traffic for the duration of construction. I've listed the
general concerns in abbreviated bullets; see attached image, and reference 6th and Pasco, and north
end of "Pasco PL NE" attaching to new complex.
a. Traffic volume
b. Noise
c. Cleanliness
d. Access to street
e. Access to limited parking
f. General safety for children and pets
2) Concern #2: Additionally, the Windwood Homes neighborhood would respectfully ask that the
"Pasco PL NE" street not be connected through to the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat at all, for
vehicle access. Instead we would like to see that access be pedestrian and bicycle access only.
EXHIBIT 9
Though we do acknowledge a general benefit to Renton Police and Fire, we are very concerned that
extending this street will further increase the speed of and volume of vehicles using" Pasco PL NE",
"61h st", and "Rosario Ave NE" respectively, as well as the rest of the streets in the neighborhood,
exasperating the safety issues existing today.
History: When Morine Highlands (neighborhood east of "Rosario Ave N") opened - 5 years ago, 6`h
street was extended from "Rosario Ave NE", to "Shadow Ave"_ That change significantly impacted
the integrity and safety of 6th street. The number of cars using this street went up three fold.
Additionally, because of the length of the street, without turns, (according to the traffic study
performed by the City of Renton) the speed of the traffic went up by approximately -30%. In the
first year of the new neighborhood access, three pets were killed, two in a one month period on the
intersection of 6 1 and Pasco. Also, there has been damage to vehicles from being side-swiped by
speeding cars and malicious vandalism to properties along that street. Shortly after the animal
incidents, the problem was reported to the Renton Police department resulting in increased police
awareness and an official traffic study. The end result; after several years of data gathering and
analysis, was to add stop signs in a pattern designed to deter speeding. Though that has helped
some, the stop signs at "6th and "Pasco PL NE" are routinely ignored. The neighborhood has also
deployed "slowdown, children playing" signs along Pasco to deter speeders. Because the benefit to
Morine Highlands and the City is so obvious, the Windwood HOA has not asked the city to revoke
this access as we continue to work to resolve this issue.
In summary, looking at a map, it is not clear what inconvenience the residence of Olympus Villa Plat
would experience by using "Nile/148`h" as opposed to "Pasco PL NE" as a general means of egress. It
does seem more clear however, that there is very little benefit to using the Windwood Homes and
Morine Highlands streets in terms of efficiency unless the intent was to avoid or ignore the posted
speed and traffic stops.
Thank you very much in advance for your consideration and attention to this matter. If I can provide you
with any additional details, or information; or if you would like to speak in person, please feel free to
contact meat 425-761-5502.
Sincerely,
Kevin Van Flandern
600 Pasco PL NE
Renton, WA 98059
425-761-S5o2
kevinvf@hotmai[.com
St
y
cn
1F. a
NE
F quest.
All
a Nothrough Veh le Traffic
Pedestrian an and Bike only
„ s
MW
qrw
IM
It
34
I�- -
k
�i �'w� �� � ¢ ��` � � } �. � � per. •.1!
G _
� x
L
i
x g
_ 5E .12 tH St
„� of
t&71m
d
INS
ACV
`NE 5th —m
` z
1tr.4th Pt
A 0,70 ”
- � 1
vs V.%o pr
2JArl4ri"m 40
A
q�.rk�c Y 1.•
71
r4 1
caemy SNE 4thSt
�
�
3
15th and Pam becomm ng
q�.rk�c Y 1.•
71
r4 1
caemy SNE 4thSt
0 0
From the Desk of Kerry M. Curran
January 27`", 2011
Project # LUA10-090, ECF -PP
Dear Mr. Timmons:
City
of pe
ntn
�trr�9 df �rs1��
JAp, 111�
a Ve'0
I have lived at 715 Rosario Place NE for five years. I would like to propose the following for this
development. Given that three deer and a fawn live in the greenbelt and adjacent proposed
development site, these deer need a buffer zone between the greenbelt and other green areas. 1
propose a 60 foot green zone for the deer to walk and habitate as diagramed on the proposed site map.
Please take this in to consideration when determining the development of the site. I will make this
proposal again at the March 15`. meeting.
425-466-8395
Rocale Timmons
From: VINCE AND MINA FLETCHER [vin_min875@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 31:23 AM
To: Rocale Timmons
Subject: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, Land Use # LUA10-099, ECF, PP
Mrs. Mina Fletcher
667 Rosario Pt. NE
Renton, WA 98059
January 25, 2011
Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner
Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Dear Associate Planner Rocale Timmons,
My name is Mina Fletcher, currently homeowner in the Maureen Highlands development. Me and my husband
five on Rosario PL NE next to the green belt for almost 6 years. We do enjoy the trees in our back yard
deers and different kinds of animals live in the green belt, too. If city going to cut down those trees and build
more houses, where those animals going to survive? Plus those trees growing for years. We should protect trees
for the earth.
Thank you for your time and please do consider to protect the trees, earth and remain natural.
Mrs. Mina Fletcher
0
Pastor/Elder David Clayton Shenk
Awesome Yah Church, Church of Yah in Christ
Church Headquarters
702 Nile Ave NE
Renton, WA 98059
(425)445-6971
Rocale Timmons
City of Renton - Current Planning
Associate Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Tel: (425) 430-7219
Fax: (425) 430-7300
Attn: Rocale Timmons, Project Manager/Associate Planner
CITY OF RENITON
RECEIVED
BUIIrBhmC, DIVISION
Hello, we are concerned about 2 land developments: proposed north of the 702 Nile Ave NE property
Olympus Villa; and the Pleasant Path, south of the 702 Nile Ave NE property.
First when looking at the road proposed along the northern property line of 702 Nile Ave NE, We see
that it has already been proposed by Bill Finkbeiner to build this road's pavement right up to northern
property line. Usually roads have a space on both sides of the road for sidewalks and planters/grass. This
road's space for sidewalks and planters/grass is proposed to be on the 702 Nile Ave NE property,
impinging 18 feet into it. This will not be allowed by the owner, since the 702 Nile Ave NE property
hasn't been sold to anyone by the owner, nor is there any plan proposed to do so by the owner. The
entire road and the space on both sides of the proposed road need to be completely contained on the
property north of 702 Nile Ave NE, and not any part of it on 702 Nile Ave NE.
Second, on the South East corner of the 702 Nile Ave NE property, it appears from the drawing of
OLYPUS VILLA that the Eastern property line has been impinged upon by the proposed development.
This will not be allowed by the owner of the 702 Nile Ave -NE -property.
Third, it will be necessary for Robert Johnseine the developer of the Pleasant Path development to build
a road through his own wetland in order to gain access to the buildable land at the back of his property
TRACT -D. And it will be necessary for the city of Renton to approve such an access road if they want
Robert Johnseine to be able to gain access to the buildable portion that is not yet platted TRACT -D. No
access through 702 Nile Ave NE will be allowed. Nor will the City of Renton be allowed to force such a
road through the 702 Nile Ave NE property at any time in the future.
As Project Manager/Associate Planner for the City of Renton please be advised of the above
encroachments and potential encroachments by current and future road and housing developments,
and plan to correct the errors by prohibiting such encroachments.
Sincerely,
lqz�l
Pastor David Clayton Shenk
1/19/2011
X
C
r
C Am,
T
xj
O
LI
m�m
'V
ryryJ,^
V
v
I
CITY fI7,z''-a.N
FAIT,)
-yIP
IVE
4 i
L X11;
•
`iJ" )-�
O-XKOLYMPUS \4UA
NW 1/4, SW 1/4. SEC. 11, T. 23 N.. R. 5 E., W.M.
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
PA&= NO. FdBC,CL xo.
lvasossosz xl �pertcra xo.
COMM 3 rcnxn m a' L 1 Y83066W9 1 ` \
7R� 4[7,Aa0 orm
5
srmu fru, o 1 1
�ir2al>asoer I 6,= _4 R
4 ,PY
\f 4
CTC .—r — =1 ft. a
10 S 7;f 3�
loot /4 �f0L,)E j� 7l OG2 M15L4e
6a
a -
2s
' -� LA
4
ban p. IL /J(\
27
�Yf 4
�
�J
a _ �
2,1
f'.' �� y
\ 1
21
pw
117G7R1 Mftu R ll>f
1l.�1�YlScaltt 1'� 1e 50' p jd.C?:!"IFICj.' �FvIS1(3�'1 as6�r ,6a6o
RAIilIE mm IyPlf CODON K 35191 Ora as/a,? (1711- 2wwM 00`1736' Epp 677721"11 a6,47i.UTi w 6cari6- E
JESMAi=7 00'1P30' 11DWM
CAMOOL ik 6T11 7RFN10ML11 # 61W, P6 MElR2,0, �mP,M CCI11k1[ AT RICY[,CRIM" d Si. 1]WN 3L A 14 M7AWL =E512 1 � �Mead Gilman & Assoc.Tr 11M. wwA PR >P.� M R E MOR.�T I Professional Y and Surveyors
RFP - 3 POLE.17M _ 1,2.x'Pw-IR 19 OMP �a w M Mam7.ar IAtiOF OLL P.4- BOX 289. WOODINVUE, WA 98072
�MwI mo- {aa�) +es -1252 Fiuc (425) 4o"loa
9 0
L
f
March 1, 2011
Office of Development Services
Rocale Timmons
so55 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98o57
Dear Rocale Timmons,
I'm writing this letter on behalf of the Windwood Homes neighborhood HOA (Home Owners Association)
in reference to the proposed land use notification we received named "Olympus Villas Preliminary Plat";
land use number LUA10-ogo, EFC, PP. There are two specific concerns we would like to address which I
have outlined in greater detail below:
1) Concern #1: Use of "Pasco PL NE" for construction traffic
2) Concern #2: Extending and connecting "Pasco PL NE" to allow traffic flow from proposed
neighborhood
1) Concern #1: We would request that traffic related to construction on the "Olympus Villa Preliminary
Plat" not be permitted access to the Windwood neighborhood unless special exceptions are
required. Sans no obvious significant economic, traffic related, or ecological benefits to route
traffic through "Pasco PL NE" and the Windwood Homes neighborhood, we request the project
confine itself to using Nile (148th st) for all traffic for the duration of construction. I've listed the
general concerns in abbreviated bullets; see attached image, and reference 6ch and Pasco, and north
end of "Pasco PL NE" attaching to new complex_
a. Traffic volume
b. Noise
c. Cleanliness
d. Access to street
e. Access to limited parking
f. General safety for children and pets
2) Concern #2: Additionally, the Windwood Homes neighborhood would respectfully ask that the
"Pasco PL NE" street not be connected through to the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat at all, for
vehicle access. Instead we would like to see that access be pedestrian and bicycle access only.
Though we do acknowledge a general benefit to Renton Police and Fire, we are very concerned that
extending this street will further increase the speed of and volume of vehicles using" Pasco PL NE",
"6th st", and "Rosario Ave NE" respectively, as well as the rest of the streets in the neighborhood,
exasperating the safety issues existing today.
History_ When Morine Highlands (neighborhood east of "Rosario Ave N") opened - 5 years ago, 6th
street was extended from "Rosario Ave NE", to "Shadow Ave". That change significantly impacted
the integrity and safety of 6th street. The number of cars using this street went up three fold.
Additionally, because of the length of the street, without turns, (according to the traffic study
performed by the City of Renton) the speed of the traffic went up by approximately --3o0/a. In the
first year of the new neighborhood access, three pets were killed, two in a one month period on the
intersection of 6th and Pasco. Also, there has been damage to vehicles from being side-swiped by
speeding cars and malicious vandalism to properties along that street. Shortly after the animal
incidents, the problem was reported to the Renton Police department resulting in increased police
awareness and an official traffic study. The end result; after several years of data gathering and
analysis, was to add stop signs in a pattern designed to deter speeding. Though that has helped
some, the stop signs at "6th' and "Pasco PL NE" are routinely ignored. The neighborhood has also
deployed "slow down, children playing" signs along Pasco to deter speeders. Because the benefit to
Morine Highlands and the City is so obvious, the Windwood HOA has not asked the city to revoke
this access as we continue to work to resolve this issue.
In summary, looking at a map, it is not clear what inconvenience the residence of Olympus Villa Plat
would experience by using "Nilej1481h" as opposed to "Pasco PL NE" as a general means of egress. It
does seem more clear however, that there is very little benefit to using the Windwood Homes and
Marine Highlands streets in terms of efficiency unless the intent was to avoid or ignore the posted
speed and traffic stops.
Thank you very much in advance for your consideration and attention to this matter. If I can provide you
with any additional details, or information; or if you would like to speak in person, please feel free to
contact me at 425-762-5502.
Sincerely,
Kevin Van Flandern
600 Pasco PL NE
Renton, WA 98059
4�5-76i-55o2
kevinvf@hotmail.com
low
.,
C
rt
li
q
ns
rJi`Ct.
Nothrough Vehicle Traffic
-P e destrian and Bike m
E.
v DsY��Q�
Art% fthLd&#A
NE pith St,
0 0 k
Denis Law
City al N.Y
Mayor
Department of Community and Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
February 23, 2011
Bill Finkbeiner
Finkbeiner Development
12011 Bel -Red Road #206
Bellevue, WA 98005
Subject: Notice of Hearing Cancellation
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Dear Mr. Korve (and Parties of Record):
On February 14, 2011, you were notified in a letter from Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, of
the date and time set for a Public Hearing regarding the above referenced matter.
You are hereby notified that the hearing, scheduled to take place March 15, 2011, has been
cancelled due to unavailability of a Hearing Examiner.
As soon as rescheduled, you and all.parties of record will receive prior written notice of the
date and time that the hearing(s) will be held to address the preliminary plat.
We apologize for this postponement and any inconvenience. If.I can provide further
information or assistance, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Roca Timmons
Ass ciate Planner
cc: David Petrie, Property Owner
Parties of Record (11)
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
ciry DC, ,s
---l-ggg"�1
..NOTICE
OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATEO (DNSM)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACT1pN
PR OIECT NAME; Olympas WI. PMIIMl
PROFECT NUMBER: ^yl' PIN
LUA30�090, ECF, PP
LOU71ON: 32M 1"'Avenua SE IPvsal e1115pSpd55)
DESCRIPTION: The aPPil"M Is mquetdng Pre Wh'M Plat aPPmeal and Enelmnmental
(SEPA) ReNew Fpr the wbdN"6' of an arlsd-6 i.ii ave Percal into 11 Tots fpr the futua m,utry�Uon of'I"k
FamM rustle h.s. The Pmj'a age Is ""ad Wmlin the Resldendal .e IRs) dualling Units Per a mNng
- desl[niHON. TM prapnad lots Woold range In she F— 5,553 square feet In ares to 8,705 squan Net. A—, to
the hots Would se provided Na a ,Mlon of Pasco PI NE eventually conneolfng to Nil. Ave NE 7th PL The
aPpll.nt is proppsing duatering For Sots 1-5 due W avlsdng road all[mmeand [intoM
! areasan #ta WnSy R-8
development standards sen be applied. hu
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIrw COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED
ACTION DOE5 NOT HAVEA SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT,
Appeals of the envlmnmental determfnaHon must 6e filed In Writing an or before SAa P.m. on February 15,
2011. Appeals muse be filed In wnting together with the required fee With: Hearing Emmineq City of
Renton, 1055 South Gody Way, Renton, WA 513057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by qty of
Renton Munidpal Code Section e -19-110.B. Addldonai Inforneatlon regarding 1he appeal process may be
obtained from the Renton CRY Clerk. office, [425? 430-Ulo.
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND PUBLISHED AT A LATER DATE. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS pi mi Ir usv_.,-
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE COCOMMUNITY & NTACf THE CI OF RE�NTO 0, DEPARTMENT OF
DO NOT REMOVETHIS NO-TICE DFVELOPMENTAT ;l430-7200.
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Please indude the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identiflcallon.
CERTIFICATION
Ihereby certify that copies of the above document
were posted in S conspicuous places or near a descri d ro ert
Date: .946111
STATE OF. SWINGTON )
SS
COUNTY OF KING
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that I c�o , 5 ,
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
uses ,11I� ;purposes mentioned in the instrument.
rr ti M
e a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print): -VI C, e _L rf
My appointment expires:J c
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 2nd day of February, 2011, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing
ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to:
Name
Representing
Agencies
See Attached
Bill Finkbeiner
Contact/Applicant
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner
Owners
Raymond Woo
Party ofRecord
David Shenk
Party of Record
Robert Johnseine
Party of Record
Ken Bouvier
Party of Record
Jarrod Faehnrich
Party of Record
Dinah Prather
Party of Record
Kerry & Shana Curran
Party of Record
(Signature of Sender): L
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
SS
COUNTY OF KING )
r,
�.~ ARF •%i
'`
I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker -will
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
mentioned in the instrument.
Dated:.t; it
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print): ( 6 f . .-
My appointment expires: ;�s {- . j t �� t3
Project Name: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
Project Number: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
template - affidavit of service by mailing
purposes
i
AGENCY (DQE) LETTER MAILING
(ERC DETERMINATIONS)
Dept_ of Ecology *
WDFW - Larry Fisher*
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.
Environmental Review Section
1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201
Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
PO Box 47703
Issaquah, WA 98027
39015-172 nd Avenue SE
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Auburn, WA 98092
WSDOT Northwest Region *
Duwamish Tribal Office *
Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
4717 W Marginal Way SW
Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
King Area Dev. Serv., MS -240
Seattle, WA 98106-1514
39015 172nd Avenue 5E
PO Box 330310
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers *
KC Wastewater Treatment Division *
Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation*
Seattle District Office
Environmental Planning Supervisor
Attn: Gretchen Kaehler
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
Ms. Shirley Marroquin
PO Box 48343
PO Box C-3755
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
Seattle, WA 98124
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
Boyd Powers *
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Serv.
City of Newcastle
City of Kent
Attn: SEPA Section
Attn: Steve Roberge
Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Director of Community Development
Acting Community Dev. Director
Renton, WA 98055-1219
13020 Newcastle Way
220 Fourth Avenue South
Newcastle, WA 98059
Kent, WA 98032-5895
Metro Transit
Puget Sound Energy
City of Tukwila
Senior Environmental Planner
Municipal Liaison Manager
Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
Gary Kriedt
Joe Jainga
6200 5outhcenter Blvd.
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431
PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W
Tukwila, WA 98188
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
Seattle Public Utilities
Real Estate Services
Attn: SEPA Coordinator
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
*Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities
will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application.
template - affidavit of service by mailing
0 0
City of ►L', o
C r I rl r
OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS -M)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
LOCATION: 122XX 148th Avenue SE (Parcel #1123059065)
DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental
(SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into it lots for the future construction of single
family residences. The project site is located within the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning
designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet In area to 8,706 square feet. Access to
the lots would be provided via extension of Pasco P1 NE eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE 7th Pl. The
applicant is proposing clustering for Lots 1-5 due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site whereby R-8
development standards can be applied.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED
ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 18,
2011. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of
Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be
obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND PUBLISHED AT A LATER DATE. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification.
Denis Law
Mayor _.. �1 Of,
%a
r f ir
r
Department of Community and Economic Development
February 2, 2011 Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Bill Finkbeiner
Finkbeiner Development
12011 Bel -Red Road #206
Bellevue, WA 98005
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD (SEPA) DETERMINATION
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Dear Mr. Finkbeiner:
This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise
you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a
threshold Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated with Mitigation Measures.
Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the
Mitigation Measures.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00
p.m. on February 18, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required
fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9805.7.
Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-
110.6. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
As in my previous correspondence, this project has been place on -hold, therefore, a
public hearing will be scheduled and published at a later date and all parties will be
notified. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at
the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the hearing.
if the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this
public hearing.
The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project
and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. if you
have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219.
Renton City Hall 9 1055 South Grady Way * Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
Bill Finkbeiner
Page 2 of 2
February 2, 2011
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Roca e Timmo
Ass date Planner
Enclosure
cc: Robert Anderson & Gale Miner/ owner(s)
Raymond Woo, David Shenk, Dinah Prather, Robert Johnseine, Ken Bouvier, Jarrod Faehnrich, Kerry &
Shana Curran / Party(ies) of Record
ERC Determination Ltr 10-090.doc
Denis Law
City of
Mayor Al
Department of Community and Economic Development
February 2, 2011 Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following
project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on January 31, 2011:
DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED
PROJECT NAME: Olympus Villa Preliminary.Plat
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
LOCATION: 122XX 14St" Avenue SE
DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and
Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel
into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5.00
p.m. on February 18, 2011. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required
fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-
110.6. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete
details. if you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Ro le Timmons
Associate Planner
Enclosure
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way 9 Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov
Washington State DepartmeoEcology
Page 2 of 2
February 2, 2011
cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region
Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Larry Fisher, WDFW
Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Duwamish Tribal Office.
Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program U5 Army Corp. of Engineers
Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY city of
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED
MITIGATION MEASURES
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA10-090, ECF, PP
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner Development
PROJECT NAME: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and
Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the
future construction of single family residences.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 122XX 148th Avenue SE
LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division
MITIGATION MEASURES:
1. The applicant shall pay a Parks and Recreation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at
the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the
time of Final Plat Recording.
2. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the
time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the
time of Final Plat Recording.
3. The applicant shall pay a Fire Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of
payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of
Final Plat Recording.
ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D city0f
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT]
DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED
ADVISORY NOTES
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA10-090, ECF, PP
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner Development
PROJECT NAME: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and
Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the
future construction of single family residences.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 122XX 1481h Avenue SE
LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental
determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal
process for environmental determinations.
Planning:
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless
otherwise approved by the Development Services Division.
2. The applicant will be required to establish a Native Growth Protection Tract over that part of the site
encompassing the stream/wetland and buffer area.
Sensitive area tract boundaries must be clearly marked with bright orange construction and silt fencing
prior to construction or site clearing activities. The boundaries shall remain marked until construction is
complete.
4. A detailed final plan to mitigate for impacts from any alterations to critical areas will be required to be
reviewed and approved, prior to the approval of the plat engineering plans.
Water:
1. Per the City Fire Marshal, the preliminary fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm
minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds
3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is
required within 300 -feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm.
Lateral spacing of fire hydrants is predicated on hydrants being located at street intersections (also capable
of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along
the travel route.
ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 2
2. Per the City Fire Marshal, lots 6 through 11 shall be sprinklered, which requires a minimum 1 -inch water
meter and not a %-inch meter, as called out on the conceptual utility plan.
Sewer:
1. The proposed development is required to install a new sewer main in Pasco PI NE extended to the north
property line, and a sewer main extended to the west the full length of the roadway. The conceptual
sewer plan does show that as required.
2. This parcel is located in East Renton Special Assessment District (SAD) 002. The fee is $316.80 per new lot
and is paid at the time a construction permit is issued.
3. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on the size of the domestic water meter.
These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued.
Streets:
1. Street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving will be required to be installed on Nile
Ave NE across the full frontage of the parcel being developed.
2. The project needs to provide right-of-way vehicular access from Nile Ave NE, through the plat to Pasco Ave
NE also with curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
3. Street lighting will be required to be installed.
4. All roadways are required to have a minimum of 25 -foot inside and 45 -foot outside turning radius.
S. All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way shall have minimum radius of fifteen feet.
G. All new electrical, phone, and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these
franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to
recording the plat.
Drainage:
1. The Surface Water SDC fees are $1,012 per lot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit
is issued.
General:
1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals, prepared
according to City of Renton drafting standards, by a licensed Civil Engineer.
2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network.
3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must
be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are
issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards.
ERC Advisory Notes Page 2 of 2
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D City of t
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
- MITIGATED (DNS -M)
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA10-090, ECF, PP
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner Development
PROJECT NAME: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental
(SEPA) Review for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single
family residences.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 122XX 1481h Avenue SE
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Environmental Review Committee
Department of Community & Economic Development
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under
their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental
impacts identified during the environmental review process.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 18, 2011.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South
Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-
110.8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)
430-6510.
PUBLICATION DATE:
DATE OF DECISION:
SIGNATURES:
February 4, 2011
January 31, 2001
Gregg Zi me 2rp
n, dmin r to
Public Works ment Date
I... A L_ J_- 4 /3 1.) Z I�
Terry Higashiyama, Administrator
Community Services Department Date
l
6111 1
�i
Mark eterson, Administrator
FiW & Emergency Services Date
ex Pftiscr, Admi �strator
Department of Co unity & Ite
Economic Development
DEPARTMENT OF COMMU C4 of
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
ERC MEETING DATE,
January 31, 2011
Project Name:
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
Owner.
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner; 13607 4615` Ave SE; North Bend, WA 98045
Applicant:
Bill Finkbeiner; Finkbeiner Development; 12011 Bel -Red Road, Ste #206; Bellevue, WA
98005
File Number:
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Project Manager:
Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner
Project Summary:
The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review
for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future
construction of single family residences. The project site is located within the
Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots
would range in size from 5,563 square feet in area to 8,706 square feet. Access to the
lots would be provided via extension of Pasco PI NE eventually connecting to Nile Ave
NE 7th Pl. The applicant is proposing clustering for Lots 1-5 due to existing road
alignments and critical areas on site whereby R-8 development standards can be
applied. The site contains a Category 2 and 3 wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill
the smaller Category 3 wetland. Mitigation is proposed in the form of the creation of
new wetland adjacent to the larger Category 2 wetland along the eastern portion of
the site, in addition to buffer enhancement.
Project Location:
Parcel ID #112305-9065
Site Area:
6.73 ac (293,152 SF)
STAFF
Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination
RECOMMENDATION.
of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS -M).
Project Location Map
ERC Report.doc
City of Renton Department of Commu* Economic Development 116ronmental Review Committee Report
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA20-090, PP, ECF
Report of January 31, 2b11 Page 2 of 6
PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review in order to subdivide a 6.73 acre site into 11 single family
lots and a tract for stormwater resulting in a density of 2.6 du/ac. In addition to the Environmental Review a
Preliminary Plat has also been requested. The proposed plat would be located in northeast Renton, on the east side
of Nile Ave NE just north of NE 6th St.
The property is in the Residential Low Density (RLD) Comprehensive Plan land use designation and the Residential 4
(R-4) zoning designation. As part of the Preliminary Plat the applicant is requesting clustering for Lots 1-5 due to the
alignment of existing roads and critical areas on site. Clustering would allow the lots to be developed with R-8
development standards, including lot size, width and depth. The proposed subdivision would result in 11 lots
ranging in lot size from 5,563 to 8,706 square feet. Lot 1 would gain access from the extended portion of Pasco Ave
NE. Lots 2-5 would gain access from two 12 -foot wide access easements extended from the proposed east/west
internal road (NE 7th PI). The remaining lots, Lots 6-11, would have direct access from the proposed east/west
internal road (NE 7th PI).
There is a Category 2 (Wetland A) and Category 3 (Wetland B) wetland located on the project site. Wetland A is
located along the east side of the site which is heavily forested with deciduous canopy. Wetland B is located at the
west end of the site. The proposed project includes the filling of Wetland B and its buffer. Mitigation in the form of
wetland creation, adjacent to Wetland A, along with buffer enhancement is proposed.
The overall elevation change within the site is about 12 feet, sloping down from the northern portion of the site to
the west. The slopes throughout the majority of the site are approximately 2.5 percent or less and range up to 5
percent in the central portion of the site. The project would result in approximately 800 cubic yards of grading which
will be used to create the internal road and storm detention pond.
The site is vegetated primarily with grass lawns, shrubs and trees. A tree inventory indicates a total of 95 trees on
the site, of which 5 percent would remain following development.
PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project
impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations.
A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials:
Issue a DNS -M with a 14 -day Appeal Period.
B. Mitigation Measures
1. The applicant shall pay a Parks and Recreation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code
at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code
at the time of Final Plat Recording.
2. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the
time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the
time of Final Plat Recording.
3. The applicant shall pay a Fire Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of
payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of
Final Plat Recording.
ERC Report.doc
City of Renton Department of Comm u* Economic Development W onmental Review Committee Report
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of January 31, 2011 Page 3 of 6
C. Exhibits
Exhibit 1 Zoning Map
Exhibit 2
Preliminary Plat Map
Exhibit 3
Drainage Control Plan
Exhibit 4
Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Plan
Exhibit S
Aerial Photo
D. Environmental Impacts
The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the
applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction
with the proposed development. Staff reviewers hove identified that the proposal is likely to hove the following
probable impacts:
1. Earth
Impacts: The overall elevation change within the site is approximately 12 feet, sloping from the upper
portion of the property to the west. The slope throughout the majority of the site is less than 2.5 percent
with the steepest slope at approximately 5 percent within the center portion of the property. The applicant
has stated approximately 800 cubic yards of material will be removed in order to construct the proposed
-stormwater pond. The proposed roadway would be constructed using the existing material on site. No fill
material is anticipated to be brought onto the site.
The soils on the site are classified as Alderwood gravelly and loam (agB). The applicant will be required to
design a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the 2009 King County
Surface Water Design Manual Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation needed
Nexus: Not Applicable
2. Water
a. Wetland, Streams, Lakes
Impacts: The applicant submitted a Critical Areas Report, prepared by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc.
(dated December 16, 2010), identifying two wetlands located on the subject site; Wetlands A and B (see
Exhibit 4). Wetland A is located along the east side of the site, and is heavily forested with a deciduous
canopy. Vegetation in this wetland consists of an overstory of red alder with an understory comprised of
vine maple, red -osier dogwood, salmonberry, and a substantial amount of Himalayn blackberry. According
to the report Wetland A is classified as a Category 2 wetland. Category 2 wetlands are required to have a
50 -foot buffer measured from the wetland edge.
Wetland B is located at the west end of the site. The wetland is dominated by a mix of hardhack, timothy,
and fescue. According to the report Wetland B is classified as a Category 3 wetland. Additionally, the report
states that this wetland has been highly disturbed due to evidence of past excavation and placement of old
concrete, and has been isolated with a dike/berm along its south side. Category 3 wetlands are required to
have a 25 -foot buffer measured form the wetland edge.
The applicant is proposing access to the site from Nile Ave NE which would require encroachment into south
portion of Wetland B and its buffer. Additionally, due to topography the applicant is proposing the
placement of the required storm facility where Wetland B currently exists. Therefore, the applicant is
proposing to fill Wetland B, approximately 4,200 square feet, and its buffer, approximately 9,900 square
feet, and provide mitigation for its lost functions elsewhere on site.
A Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Plan was included in the Critical Areas Report- In order to compensate for
the impacts stated above the applicant is proposing the creation of wetland, along the southwest side of
ERC Report.doc
City of Renton Deportment of Commu* Economic Development *ronmental Review Committee Report
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of January 31, 2011 Page 4 of 6
Wetland A, in the amount of 6,300 square feet. The applicant is also proposing some minor buffer averaging
for the western buffer of Wetland A. Enhancement, of approximately 18,491 square feet, of the buffer
associated with Wetland A is proposed in order to mitigate impacts.
The applicant will be required to comply with RMC 4-3-050 Critical Areas regulations to mitigate for any
impacts permitted to the wetland and stream buffer. Staff will be recommending approval of the buffer
averaging proposal subject to conditions.
In order to preserve and protect the wetland and its buffer the applicant will be required, as part of the
Preliminary Plat approval, to establish a Native Growth Protection Easement over that part of the site
encompassing the stream/wetland and buffer area.
Conditions associated with preliminary plat approval will likely include a review and approval of a final
wetland mitigation plan, wetland signage and fencing, buffer enhancement, etc., as allowed per City Code.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation needed
Nexus: Not applicable
b. Storm Water
Impacts: The site lies within the Maplewood Creels sub -basin of the Cedar River/Lake Washington
watershed. Currently the property has two points of discharge. The easterly side of the property flows to
the southeast corner. The westerly side of the property sheet flows to the west and into a drainage ditch
along Nile Ave NE. The ground slopes from the upper portion of the property to the west and into the ditch
along Nile Ave NE. The drainage along Nile Ave NE slopes from centerline to the existing roadside open
ditch to the easterly side. The open ditch continues to flow to the south from the site to the intersection of
NE 4th St.
The applicant submitted a Preliminary Drainage Report prepared by Offe Engineers, PLLC, dated December
9, 2010. The report states that the proposed project would be required to provide detention for the
impervious areas on site. A stormwater wetpond is proposed on the westerly side of the property in order
to collect and discharge flows per the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the
City of Renton. The easterly side of the site is not proposed to be developed with the exception of Lot 1
which will utilize fill dispersion of runoff continuing into the existing wetlands and flowing to the southeast.
The conceptual plan and report did not include conceptual sizing calculations for the detention nor did it
address the individual lot treatments. As a condition of preliminary plat approval the applicant will be
required to revise the drainage report to include this information.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation needed
Nexus: Not applicable
3. Parks and Recreation
Impacts: It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future demand on existing City
parks and recreational facilities and programs. Therefore, staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring
the applicant to pay an appropriate Parks Impact Fee. Currently this fee is assessed at $530.76 per each new
single-family lot with credit given for the existing single-family lot. However, the City is planning an
adjustment to the Parks and Recreation impact fee in the near future. Therefore the fee, as determined by
the Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment, shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton
Municipal Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Parks and Recreation Impact fee, as determined by the
Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the
Renton Municipal Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, Resolution 3082, RMC 4-1 Administration and Enforcement
ERC Report.doc
City of Renton Department of Commune Economic Development Sronmental Review Committee Report
OLYMPUS VILLA_ PRELIMINARY PLAT LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Report of January 31, 2011 — - - - Page 5 of 6
4. Transportation
Impacts: Lot 1 would gain access from the extended portion of Pasco Ave NE. Lots 2 through 5 would gain
access from two 12 -foot wide access easements extended from the proposed east/west internal road (NE 7"
PI). The remaining Lots 6-11 would have direct access from the proposed east/west internal road (NE 7th PI).
It is anticipated that the proposed project would result in impacts to the City's street system. In order to
mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to pay an
appropriate Transportation Impact Fee. Currently this fee is assessed at $75.40 per net new average daily
trip attributed to the project. However, the City is planning an adjustment to the Transportation impact fees
in the near future. Therefore the fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment,
shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Transportation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton
Municipal Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton
Municipal Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, Resolution 3100, RMC 4-1 Administration and Enforcement
5. Fire & Police
Impacts: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicated that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the
proposed development; subject to the condition that the applicant provides Code required improvements
and fees. Therefore, staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to pay an appropriate
Fire Impact Fee. Currently this fee is assessed at $488.00 per each new single-family lot with credit given for
the existing single-family lot. However, the City is planning an adjustment to the Fire Impact Fee in the near
future. The fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be
payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Fire Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal
Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal
Code at the time of Final Plat Recording.
Nexus: Fire Impact Fee Resolution 2895, SEPA Environmental Regulations, RMC 4-1 Administration and
Enforcement
E. Comments of Reviewing Departments
The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their
comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant."
✓ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report.
]Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in
writing on or before 5:00 PM, February 18, 2011.
Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.8 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing
at the City Clerk's office along with the required fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be
obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057.
ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use
action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the
land use actions.
Planning:
1_ RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise
ERC Report.doc
City of Renton Department of Common & Economic Development
OLYMPUS VILLA PRELIMINARYPL
Report of January 31, 2011
ronmental Review Committee Report
LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Page 6 of 6
approved by the Development Services Division_
2. The applicant will be required to establish a Native Growth Protection Tract over that part of the site encompassing
the stream/wetland and buffer area.
3. Sensitive area tract boundaries must be clearly marked with bright orange construction and silt fencing prior to
construction or site clearing activities. The boundaries shall remain marked until construction is complete.
4. A detailed final plan to mitigate for impacts from any alterations to critical areas will be required to be reviewed and
approved, prior to the approval of the plat engineering plans.
Water:
1. Per the City Fire Marshal, the preliminary fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for
dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a
minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300 -feet of the
proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Lateral spacing of fire hydrants is
predicated on hydrants being located at street intersections (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM)
within 300 feet of the structure. This distance is measured along the travel route.
2. Per the City Fire Marshal, lots 6 through 11 shall be sprinklered, which requires a minimum 1 -inch water meter and
not a Y. -inch meter, as called out on the conceptual utility plan.
Sewer:
1. The proposed development is required to install a new sewer main in Pasco PI NE extended to the north property line,
and a sewer main extended to the west the full length of the roadway. The conceptual sewer plan does show that as
required_
2. This parcel is located in East Renton Special Assessment District (SAD) 002. The fee is $316.80 per new lot and is paid
at the time a construction permit is issued.
3. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on the size of the domestic water meter. These fees are
collected at the time a construction permit is issued.
Streets:
1_ Street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving will be required to be installed on Nile Ave NE across
the full frontage of the parcel being developed.
I The project needs to provide right-of-way vehicular access from Nile Ave NE, through the plat to Pasco Ave NE also
with curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
3. Street lighting will be required to be installed.
4. All roadways are required to have a minimum of 25 -foot inside and 45 -foot outside turning radius.
5. All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way shall have minimum radius of fifteen feet.
6. All new electrical, phone, and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of these franchise
utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to recording the plat.
Drainage:
1. The Surface Water SDC fees are $1,012 per lot. These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued.
General:
1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals, prepared according to
City of Renton drafting standards, by a licensed Civil Engineer_
2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control Network.
3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee must be paid upon
application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the permits are issued. There may be
additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting Standards_
ERC Report.doc
U/ - UL 1 L.51N Kul+; W 11L
ZONING MAP BOOK F7 - 14 T23N R5E W 1/2
PW TECHNICAL SERVICES
PRINTED ON 11/13/04
the bnl inbrmallm.vaWhk caf [Fe 4aiesFown.
moo. .mea ��fayp.�R�i„ 0 200 440
Ci y d Feet
L [-'r r, 1:4,800
N
E7
11 T23N R5E W 112
5311
:...... _.. ....
WE sf
R-4
R-4._
R-0
R-4
-4
_ l
..
se
R-4
-
......
8E UAj b
a4�s
........
............
.._.
_.
-
R-4
R-4
R-4
R-4
L
R-4
NE
R-4
R-4
R-4
NK
4
R-4 ..
INE..
EXHIBIT 1
W
WE 4h 81
-
-
a
z
SE 128h Sh
.. _..
.
ZONING MAP BOOK F7 - 14 T23N R5E W 1/2
PW TECHNICAL SERVICES
PRINTED ON 11/13/04
the bnl inbrmallm.vaWhk caf [Fe 4aiesFown.
moo. .mea ��fayp.�R�i„ 0 200 440
Ci y d Feet
L [-'r r, 1:4,800
N
E7
11 T23N R5E W 112
5311
F441 01110 L4 I 1J;': Wer, 14
74W 92 93 455 (- 456 46B_
(_
B
_ r - _ 1-.�---
B23- �B-1B,7
26 T24N R4E r �r ®�
25 T2'4�tN`R4E-I _ , 0:: 24N R5E �9 T24N RS g8 i241� RSE 'j' 27 T�4N--
. R5E:; 26 T24N Fi5E
94 Y Y
4551N i _ "' 458 464
h ,i i �:�� , - .a
1C2'CSS ��C7
35T24NIR4E' 36 T24N R4E 31 T24N R5E '`. 4N`RSE 35 T24N R5E
i
3 [I l�flTy 307w0$ T�3Q9 i-8 a
ZIL,lam �� ��� � 14 '� 2 � � '
J D i �^' r.�//l
y�i_J �. - _� �' l
3
IT
S23i I' r7 -
6T23N R5E T23N-p 4 T23N R5E ,3'1-23N R5E 2 T23N R5E
3117 349 369 I ` 8051 $D6
rt Y7
7
IE5
1 T MA4E 12 T23N1i4E. `I �l T- r fl('�
T29N R5E I?3 R5E 9i23N R6Er F 10 T23N
N R5E
1
32 326 327 .370
I
Ti 1 _
J _�.
T
47
5
23r+i\ A RE4'T23NIF4RI4f 18T23NRSEi 17 t f5E _-
2JN
' w
R5E'c, 14.
z
\335 �,, r 336J 337 . I 371 Y 815-f, Si fi
2
I t —
T23N R4E-7--.24 T23N R4E I 19 T23N R lEi 20.T29N R5E _ °;= 21 T23hYfi5E 22 T23 R5E - p3 T23N 2
44 — 34 — 600 ' I 6D1 L X02 820 821
1 - r
I it
1
1 _
If
t.;
T23N R4E 3-':
25 ?23 1 R4E 30.T23N R5E' i1 29 TY3N'R5E 28 T23N R5E -!: I. T23N RSE26 T23
, N ,
__J f - R5E 25
0 __ 651E X04111 11605,82511 8216fi
� • tea- l� ii -
1
3 E 36 T23N R4E7 31 T23 I R5E III--: i 34 T23N FI5E 3fi
3223N R5E 33 T23N 35 T23N R5E
-� 607_ 608 16j10 .'632 833
-
J,
-6,
J2
/7
= f 22N 'Y-
p4E 1 T22N i34E= 6 T22N R _ �� �I 5�2 R5E 4 TSN f�,5E ;� 3 T22N R5E 2 T22N R5E 1 T
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE CENTERS INDUSTRIAL
(RC) Resource Conservation r (CV) Center Village
[IL) Industrial -Light
R -i (R-1) Residential 1 du/ac uc-°41 (UC -N1) Urban Center - North 1 itl (IM) Industrial - Medium
FF _-4 (R-4) Residential 4 du/ac ucuc nR (UC -N2) Urban Center - North 2 It (IH) Industrial -Heavy
_-a (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac co (CD) Center Downtown
Rwy (RMH) Residential Manufactured Homes
-m (R-10)Residential 10 du/ac COMMERCIAL
R -i` (R-14) Residential 14 du/ac ----- Renton City Limits
FN:-ri (RM -F) Residential Multi -Family cTR (COR) Commercial/Office/Residential __
— Adjacent L'ifr i.imits
RM -T (RM -T) Residential Multi -Family Traditional a (CA) Commercial Arterial
RM -u (RM -U) Residential Multi -Family Urban Center rij (CO) Commercial Office KROLL PAGE
�w (CN) Commercial Neighborhood PAGE# INDEX
mss °°er oct 5 ° �'Op^,ea`l�a.l°:imosa;l qiy!°°a ed
A,a o. IFe bnmoron, c I;
n,�� °roe � a -msP, vl�yc rvose. °ply.
SERnoW14mw4�E
i
i
W� OLYMPUS VILLA
NW 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 11. T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M.
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
PARCEL N0. MEL N0. 1
I7$806880b# � 25068032 , ARCEL N0.
CATW V 7 WEI WTH 25'
9977E71. SEE WEANU Ixroer.XO-
I
s �
1 � �
5
9 �,} 7 0.726 w h
706 8. 1 D fL a7tJ6 ++F n. 10. 4 7 IL 0.7os7n1 n �i 4 6 ,cr
s6d.9r `
OF
s
III MAY VUFLW40
TRACT C , . --1-�-----�--�- ---- -- �_ -_' » IL
OPEN- SPAGC-)
PARCEL 90.
fi$306H002 � � I
l � r`taaoasoio �� 2a
K FL
ease w rt
a4h
SF
24
\ 2
6.553 4 tL
Its
N.
1 I 27 I 8$
WMTEIM/W
Now
of Menton C1 X91- 100M
C2 714. 1599'19' Imm
Scale 1' = 50'
?',ii),I '��fi��. DiV1Slofl p 1x15 759'22' loam
G 3&16 5'179,' 251
smc Halt o44xo6n,e SYSTEM Ow 67/911
U 103M x W17y6- f
Zr� i3 l9 9607 x R2F21" w 14B
xr� rNZ
�: Gilman & Assoc.
EXHIBIT 2 °�A0 ,��� Qional Land Surveyors
289, WOODIWLLE, WA 98072
in � lam5) 186-1252 FAX! (425) 486-8108'ILWILL$aOF
opo ora
i d: ,�; mroRsa eHnu
N O2ilNOO 3E)VNI"(I
3N1313NN13 7719
L]p r O
VlllA SndV%klO r
q
0.
�. naar nw +e Nawux on
law "* nerd—� — — — -
N019NTHSVM 'No1N37 X01MMI 16
H.", (xxx-o wm) ivnd VITA sndwxno 30 ALIO tw .a.: —. I-
V,
H
ca
H
2
x
W
0
r --i
a
_
ly
N
EO
r/i QN7 y N
,
J d (A (D
o
4
o z O m �° +6 m m m
m = Y+ Z Wa' N N H i7 m
d ■
o
K
m
NT
Z
Q
qhqss
w
'n
! rmZ:5
IN; ld OYPS" 4A
t
-D y
• Z
ILL
P2fISO
a.
�y
am + y
ai
law
co
Amr
It
71
NOW
OF
4
114-1
ti k46
J
� � .iF�
Y � I .hV�r
'
��••
s Lf
19 t
�.
All
Yl
�. f
..1I0
5 ■
rn
�i
IV
1119111
.:• ' ti
,6' 1. .�. . a
4 O
�1.
Q.
13y
q�j 7 CL y H y N q L j `n m m
Q UI ba Q a ISdmj
� �l7
uj
ze2i o w '0 ru o i�j3 Hca �' C
03
V Z V 3 ;"1 $ y cx m y R!
01
41
rw f y— 3 �-r 0] 7 U t+n� a t
a
V O
1G C rm ;n CL LU U E n
www tQ y� N 3 i Ncu C cu
M�
i�a fn u. z 8 u, ui
tm
u sG w- y
v as
Jz
51
N U rte.. N R Z 10 `� .• rL-+ y, 4
n. g d 6 X c Q s V vi > t= A
fl coo � ; � a �i � a -sv1< 's m
...+ o a j o f o Q7 6c6 = N v 3 E a1
L y O U jru
C [) R d t7 3. ii
an n,
IR 40
in c
M.5 O.0 2 �F d c N
V)N d r 2�
A Y4W0 QO
z
ww"i N G3 y 4J i W 4) L ice-% d 3-� ...4 m cn
y '�
cu m
r�jJcm a
G7 f6 7] t w A p �, 7+
W 4 .� O i H v vi a' q a+ m m M
w�` to o'a ata' ~
41
' R in se N O — e m u C w y `8 o
m
1 CCL 8
zCL_ 'v+' s N E p O m D c vi S
Z
a3c c o Enr.aO1,.69 06w +'+ E
47 -- .r c 3: N 41 ...
CL
Aa
0
io m
'-
t t� a
q}
C g u
S
vA �-{
V S
y �j ::3a
o
v
a.c
w E
o y
L Qom}
ui {
R! 0 o
[n CLT G! u
w
O
In
j
y, v
m };
va v a
C u7
In <n C:
�7 _
Q7 11f
va
cn
-E M, m
4f
i
C; to w
m
o
Q
C �
y� � Q�
r CI. A
C5L O
w
, Z O C
41
3: v
0,1 L11 L
V
C d
N 0 S Q
47
a "" C
y
{A c 2:�,
p d) Vol
+A+
O L/i C7
to
a ami m c m 3
Q„ Q -0
m a
L CM
CL
" E O
b p
0 O7.
R
A R
a a y C
�
cm O
�
y
U -0O
o E
y O
Q
d Q
O m— ro4
L
+�
v?
m
E
Z 'n
C d W
�_..+
Ln C: Lw
ice!! '00 y i
4
m
yY4
+.F,b
r s�`
r
R
V
v
\i\
`
V
}
F-
rfv
m
0
0
c:
tea'
rk_
�1
t -p
11lNa
t
N
. et
11
11
tiJ
P
0
�
—
�
�}
�
�
�
---
�
'
Z
�
:
�
�
\
.
-
'
�
�
..
—
%
�
-
�_
��
•
�
��
a
A
0
0
� \
�
.
�
`7
���
}
�
7
�
�
�
ƒ
�
\�
-
:
{
�.
I
� }
�
� �
t
� �
\
1
�|
ta
—\
Cu
'
1-5
\
4L"
C -N
\�
|
� !
� \
�
-
�
� \
`tet-' � � -
,a
- _:=
._, � rc
o
VM;� -m g7qpu a
he
E.
AM
-.. �.�'�-elks=• �_,n �»- '-- .�' �a, =�- '- IW � a' �� �l��
ice. VI F 11 RE
-®
�f.. r, - ��� y��� � g��l. " •� - Wit.. ��t�-' _ ..t' -fir "r ~ -i
70
gghg WR
th
NOW
MM
.
y }'•ay�s'B' _ - 3�' r�rSL MI—
6rrs;n�,.ir, .. ps,Y. x I t - �� - ,.'vP �` .. �,••r8^r� -�-�
pj
n -a
wor
-
:�'��
r''r.'
gri!, }gym q---- x f _
52.
rWO
e-1Mr T t
��"�5 i E
M""-" -11 �,�='G��i
ai nff Lam` moi€ r
�+ �
�� �'f(
r
r
. O Z � pcp 0 y � � Y c '^ '� UCi .d ¢. ar � J 3 `!' .� J .G ^ — ^a �-a Y
Q, °� saCCUa a� o nZ �` �.�
cc v r °Zi E L o-
Gx7Zv3 � o �� N `n^ C:] o � o ,,,;,�UU � ae`5
[z .z
OW Q�FQx c o o S� a� v ^ v _ ^� auk G� Feu]
Z F^ G� ), E J o b. c <n 0 3 c_ rG f b J ti n. y 7
"r ���Q o:o �w- G o� U„ L 7 ory S'S as y y_�L M
eU S
zyEWLi-z ? yy L^wo �gcy�A
covXv U�^5o G o uQmCooL ti L N
w'- U •y
Z p 3 G ..� a. O o [ - �• LI] Rs -C �.' �A W :..� C M d. y
W Z64 Z v c '� ^ n'u iy v W ca9 c c c p c c>c 7a �j .rn cd
d
UQ v ��°-��a, y¢ v -S¢ 3� c 3zcCCC :J :n ,S c.� v tiC �'�°'Y7k
Denis Law --
Mayor City O TWI -Y
_y
rte -
Department of Community and Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
February 14, 2011
Bill Finkbeiner
Finkbeiner Development
12011 Bel -Red Road #206
Bellevue, WA 98005
SUBJECT: "Off Hold" Notice
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat / LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Dear Mr. Finkbeiner:
Thank you for submitting the additional materials requested in the February 1, 2011 letter from
the City. Your project has been taken off hold and the City will continue review of the Olympus
Villa Preliminary Plat project.
The Preliminary Plat has been rescheduled to go before the Dearing Examiner on March 15,
2011 at 9:00 a.m. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 430-7219.
Sincerely, ,
Roc Timmons
Associate Planner
cc Robert Anderson & Gale Miner /owner(s)
Party(ies) of Record
File No. LUAIO-090
Renton City Hall 9 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 + rentonwa.gov
Denis Law W. CltY O
Mayor
!'"r
Department of Community and Economic Development
February 14, 2011 Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Kerry M. Curran
715 Rosario PL NE
Renton, WA 98059
Subject: Comment Response Letter
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, LUA10-090, ECF, Pp
Dear Kerry Curran:
Thank you for your comments related to the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat; dated January 27,
2011. Your letter has been included in the official project file and you have been made a party of
record.
The applicant, Finkbeiner Development, is not proposing the removal of any trees adjacent to
the Maureen Highlands subdivision. The wetland, referred to in your comment letter, would be
placed in a Native Growth Protection Easement, and would not be adversely impacted as part of
the proposal. The applicant is proposing to increase and enhance the wetland and its buffer
area along its western edge (please see the attached Mitigation Plan).
As a separate note, this matter is tentatively rescheduled for a Public Hearing on March 15,
2011 at 9:00 a.m., Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,
Renton.. Please feel free to attend.
If you have any further questions regarding this project feel free to contact me at (425) 430-
7219.
Sincerely,
Roc e Timm
As ciate Planner
cc: File WA10-094, PP, ECF
Renton City Hall 9 1055 South Grady Way 9 Renton, Washington 98057 9 rentonwa.gov
Denis Law 0
Mayor City Cy
A.
-r
t
��1
Department of Community and Economic Development
February 14, 2011 Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Pastor/ Elder David Clayton Shenk
Awesome Yah Church, Church of Yah in Christ
702 Nile Ave NE
Renton, WA 98059 .
Subject: Comment Response Letter
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Pleasant Path Preliminary Plat, LUA09-120, PP, ECF (KC File No.LOSSR020)
Dear Pastor Shenk:
Thank you for your comments and photos related to the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat; dated
January 19, 2011. Your letter has been included in the official project file and you have been
made a party of record. Your comments and questions will be considered by the reviewing
official before making a decision on this project.
In addition, this matter is tentatively rescheduled for a Public Hearing on March 15, 2011 at 9:00
a.m.; Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City full, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton.
The Pleasant Path Preliminary Plat was approved on January 25, 2008 by King County
Department of Development and Environmental Services prior to annexation into the City.
While your comments cannot be considered in the preliminary plat decision you have been
added as a party of record and will receive any future correspondence related to the project.
If you have any further questions regarding this project feel free to contact me at (425) 430-
7219.
Sincerely,
Roc e Timmo
As ciate Planner
cc: File LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way * Renton,Washington 98057 9 rentonwa.gov
Denis Law — - City of
or
Department of Community and Economic Development
February 14, 2011 Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Mina Fletcher
667 Rosario PL NE
Renton, WA 98059
Subject: Comment Response Letter
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Dear Mrs. Flethcher:
Thank you for your comments and photos related to the Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat; dated
January 25, 2011. Your letter/email has been included in the official project file and you have
been made a party of record.
The applicant, Finkbeiner Development, is not proposing the removal of any trees adjacent to
the Maureen Highlands subdivision. The wetland, referred to in your comment letter, would be
placed in a Native Growth Protection Easement, and would not be adversely impacted as part of
the proposal. The applicant is proposing to increase and enhance the wetland and its buffer
area along its western edge (please see the attached Mitigation Plan).
As a separate note, this matter is tentatively rescheduled for a Public Hearing on March 15,
2011 at 9:00 a.m., Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,
Renton. Please feel free to attend.
If you have any further questions regarding this project feel free to contact me at (425) 430-
7219.
Sincerely,
Roc e Timmo
As ciate Planner
cc: File LUA10-090, PP, ECF
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way * Renton, Washington 98057. • rentonwa.gov
Denis Law- -MW
Mayor City of
Department of Community and Economic Development
February I, 2011 Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Bill Finkbeiner
Finkbeiner Development
12011 Bel -Red Road #206
Bellevue, WA 98005
SUBJECT: "On Hold" Notice
Olympus Viiia Preliminary Plat / I,UA10-090, ECF, PP
Dear Mr. Finkbeiner:
The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on
January 7, 2011, During our review, staff has determined that additional information is
necessary in order to proceed further.
The following information will need to be submitted before February 28, 2.011 so that we may
continue the review of the above subject application: -
* Secondary Critical Areas Report Review. The applicant submitted a Critical Areas
Report, prepared by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc. (dated December 16, 2010),
identifying two wetlands; A and B. Wetland A, the larger of the two, is located along the
east side of the site and Wetland B is located at the west end of the site. Comments
were received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division regarding the
characterization of Wetland B and descrepancies in delineation. Per RMC 4-3-050F7 the
Reviewing Official may require the applicant to fund analyses including evaluation by. an
independent qualified professional regarding the applicant's submitted analysis and the
effectiveness of any proposed mitigating measures or programs, and to include any
recommendations as appropriate. This review would be paid at the applicant's expense.
Due to the comments received, secondary review of the submitted wetland report
prepared by Sewell Wetland Consulting, Inc. will be conducted by the City's contractor,
Otak, Inc.
At this time, your project has been placed "on hold" and public hearing postponed pending
receipt of the requested information. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
:x
Reale Timmons
Associate Planner
cc Robert Anderson & Gale Miner / Owner(s)
Party(ies) of Record
File No. LUA10-090
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way + Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa_gov
Pastor/Elder David Clayton Shenk
Awesome Yah Church, Church of Yah in Christ
Church Headquarters
702 Nile Ave NE
Renton, WA 98059
(425)445-6971
Rocale Timmons
City of Renton - Current Planning
Associate Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Tel: (425) 430-7219
Fax: (425) 430-7300
Attn: Rocale Timmons, Project Manager/Associate Planner
:rrr a� �rNrQnJ
E 0l�:lVE D
BUILDING, 01VISION
Hello, we are concerned about 2 land developments: proposed north of the 702 Nile Ave NE property
Olympus Villa; and the Pleasant Path, south of the 702 Nile Ave NE property.
First when looking at the road proposed along the northern property line of 702 Nile Ave NE, We see
that it has already been proposed by Bill Finkbeiner to build this road's pavement right up to northern
property line. Usually roads have a space on both sides of the road for sidewalks and planters/grass. This
road's space for sidewalks and planters rass is proposed to be on the 702 Nile Ave NE property,
impinging 18 feet into it. This will not be allowed by the owner, since the 702 Nile Ave NE property
hasn't been sold to anyone by the owner, nor is there any plan proposed to do so by the owner. The
entire road and the space on both sides of the proposed road need to be completely contained on the
property north of 702 Nile Ave NE, and not any part of it on 702 Nile Ave NE.
Second, on the South East corner of the 702 Nile Ave NE property, it appears from the drawing of
_.
OLYPUS_VILLA that the Eastern property line has been impinged upon b,y_the proposed development.„
This will not be allowed by the owner of the 702 Nile Ave NE property.
Third, it will be necessary for Robert Johnseine the developer of the Pleasant Path development to build
a road through his own wetland in order to gain access to the buildable land at the back of his property
TRACT -D. And it will be necessary for the city of Renton to approve such an access road if they want
Robert Johnseine to be able to gain access to the buildable portion that is not yet platted TRACT -D. No
access through 702 Nile Ave NE will be allowed. Nor will the City of Renton be allowed to force such a
road through the 702 Nile Ave NE property at any time in the future. R�
As Project Manager/Associate Planner for the City of Renton please be advised of the above
encroachments and potential encroachments by current and future road and housing developments,
and plan to correct the errors by prohibiting such encroachments.
Sincerely, ��� �� ,�J �j�� y✓
Pastor David Clayton Shenk
1/19/2011
i
19.
r-
WA-XX-XXX—FP
mOLYMPUS VILLA
VJi NW 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC. 11. T. 23 N.. R. 5 E., W.M.
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON
PARCYL A6.
fi' 1!f$0$BBOai� 1169G89 \ 1
aoEo4n 3 WFOAM .af, 2F L
1w Yeww ,eD6rtr. I ` , 1 �' \ \=
r
i \
�axca; j F. 1 1 1 5
` r 0
WAX +o n e26• IG ,Lw R = a.�aa .�; ,or
/ / ` f 4
C 9r NIL"
JOP€ SP1
rD
dot ,� lta Aim, . /v7,1ce- A"
r6 1 ! l2swom ` I
S'
rs
1LA
h
5-
27
AC T--)
as
1
of Renton
—
6 �
� N f
Y U 1Cb nb I Ld66, 6IR61n,LA.gp� nu.,s �
Scale 1" 50'LA
"M MI COWAN" srsie, 3r6 "1) aF 70.19 R,T,i' 77666 a"
Ll 1m I1 aalr7e' ['
J 7�ff �LY 962/ M CTtY71' • �11E
L7 7141 Y !nn! - E_
L4 TM 3 967456' w d
6w>c!,>x w. ter v „a,ai1 w�s,9a wart x.Ic
(6192,91. Ld4Fi M 66lICA!]i AT h¢
..,.,r ynE,es�nw a sE. ,�ot,1 ar. Au6 taex
(/ FW$f61107�� Mead Gilman & Assoc.
P.W.FW 6M 0 T NQRI~ ENe Professional Land Surveyors
T9i - s �N9, rrxlcw ao.a r, nc M9imawzr ' P_o. BOX 289. WOODIWLLE, WA 86072 _ ct Os,am , %(x 1G7rb plwhEEL- (423) 486-1232 FAY- (423) 4"-61n6
1&NUMMAY SHEET 2 OF 2
6
•
From the Desk of Kerry M. Curran
Of
v sio".
January 27`x', 2011
Project # LUA10-090, ECF -PP
Dear Mr. Timmons:
I have lived at 715 Rosario Place NE for five years. I would like to propose the following for this
development. Given that three deer and a fawn live in the greenbelt and adjacent proposed
development site, these deer need a buffer zone between the greenbelt and other green areas. I
propose a 60 foot green zone for the deer to walk and habitate as diagramed on the proposed site map.
Please take this into consideration when determining the development of the site. I will make this
proposal again at the March 1". meeting.
Th ,
erry M. Cu
425-465-8395
0
7�V
Rocale Timmons 0
From: Carrie Koperski [ckoperski@hotmail.comj
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Rocale Timmons; Carrie Koperski
Subject: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, Land Use # LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Mrs. Carrie Koperski
662 Rosario PI NE
Renton, WA 98059
January 24, 2011
Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner
Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Dear Associate Planner Rocale Timmons,
We apologize for submitting our written comments a few days after the January 21, 2011 deadline. Thank you for
notifying our family regarding the proposed construction of new homes in our area. After taking a careful review of the
document you sent, we would like to express the following concerns:
*Please consider drainage implications for adjacent properties. We are currently homeowners in the Maureen Highlands
development, behind the land under consideration. We live on Rosario Place NE, facing the property in question. We are
fortunate in that we are across the street from the green belt and wetlands on the property. We enjoy the view, with the
beautiful trees and singing birds throughout most of the year. We also appreciate that these trees block some of the
intense afternoon sun that hits the front of our house. We are concerned about what removal of the green belt and filling
in of wetlands may due to add to drainage issues for our neighbors. Several of them have had standing water in their
backyards and have had to take significant steps to prevent damage to their foundations/crawl spaces as a result. We
wanted to bring this to your attention as you decide whether to allow the filling of the category three wetland, determine
what type of buffer needs to be provided, and choose what actions are required to mitigate the loss of that wetland.
*Please consider traffic flow/safety as you determine the layout of the development. Currently, the Windwood
neighborhood works hard to encourage drivers to watch out for young children playing ball and riding bikes on our
residential streets. Having Pasco Place extended would likely encourage higher speeds, as we have seen with longer
stretches of road in the Maureen Highlands. Perhaps additional stop signs would help, or providing cul de sacs, etc. We
know many families from our own neighborhood will be tempted to turn right onto Pasco Place and go through the new
development to get onto Nile, both to go to Apollo Elementary and for northbound commutes.
*If Nile needs to be blocked at some point because of the construction project, please consider school bus schedules for
Apollo Elementary. We have had several new homes built in this area in recent months and years, and those closest to
the school can cause delays for students because there is no alternative route.
*Finally, we know the economy is weak and everyone can benefit from the jobs that are generated from new home
construction. However, we need a balanced approach to development. The homes on 128th/4th and Jericho are right on
top of each other, with hardly any yards, parks, playgrounds or green space at all. Our tall evergreens are being cut down
and now all we see to see in many directions is houses and roads. We are thankful in the Maureen Highlands
development that Harbor Homes allotted for adequate yards for each lot, but no park,/playground was provided and the
common areas are wetlands. We are less than a mile from an elementary school and so most families here have young
children who need places outdoors to play together. Please consider the need for wooded areas, grassy areas and open
spaces, especially as you take this project into consideration in light of all the other development going on nearby. We
have homes that may not be brand new but are less than 7 years old, some of which have been foreclosed, and they
have not sold for months. Do we need more houses built in this area?
We understand this is private property and we appreciate what the city has done to encourage homeowners on Nile to
make improvements to their homes, especially such steps as junk removal, repairs, etc. We just want to make sure that
this area continues to be a great place for young families, especially because of its proximity to Apollo Elementary School.
Thank you for your consideration. G amily is not available to attend the MarcAhearing, but we would appreciate
being kept up to date on this case. Thanks again,
Mrs. Carrie Koperski
0
cty oe r
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
D{v�
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M Q R A N D U M
DATE: January 25, 2011
TO: Rocale Timmons, Planner
FROM: Arneta Henninger, Plan Review /��
SUBJECT: OLYMPUS VILLA PLAT
NILE AVE NE & NE 7T" PL & PASCO PL NE
LUA 10-090, PARCEL #1123059065
I have completed a review for the above -referenced 11 lot plat proposal located in the vicinity of Nile
Ave NE, NE 7tt' PI & Pasco PI NE, all in SW % of Sect. 11, Twp 23N Rng 5 E. The following comments are
based on the application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
WATER: This site is located in the Water District 90 water service boundary. A water availability
certificate is required from King County Water District 90. This site is not located in the Aquifer
Protection Zone.
SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer main Pasco PI NE. See City of Renton
engineering plans # 5-2790 for the AsBuilt.
STORM: There are existing storm drainage facilities in Pasco PI NE. See drawing # R-2790.
CODE REQUIREMENTS
WATER
1. Per the City Fire Marshal, the preliminary fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm
minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling
exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire
hydrant is required within 300 -feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up
to 1,500 gpm. Lateral spacing of fire hydrants is predicated on hydrants being located at street
intersections (also capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 GPM) within 300 feet of the structure. This
distance is measured along the travel route.
2. Per the City Fire Marshal, lots 6 through 11 shall be sprinklered, which requires a minimum 1 -inch
water meter and not a %-inch meter, as called out on the conceptual utility plan.
SANITARY SEWER
1. The proposed development is required to install a new sewer main in Pasco PI NE extended to the
north property line, and a sewer main extended to the west the full length of the roadway. The
conceptual sewer plan does show that as required.
Diympus villa Plat — LUA 10-090
Page 2 of 2
January 25, 2011
2. This parcel is located in East Renton Special Assessment District (SAD) 002. The fee is $316.80 per
new lot and is paid at the time a construction permit is issued.
3. The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on the size of the domestic water meter.
These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is issued.
STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
1. Street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving will be required to be installed on
Nile Ave NE across the full frontage of the parcel being developed.
2. The project needs to provide right-of-way vehicular access from Nile Ave NE, through the plat to
Pasco Ave NE also with curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
3. Street lighting will be required to be installed.
4. All roadways are required to have a minimum of 25 -foot inside and 45 -foot outside turning radius.
5. All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way shall have minimum radius of fifteen
feet.
6. Traffic mitigation fees of $7,895.25 will be required prior to recording of the plat as a condition of the
plat.
7. All new electrical, phone, and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The construction of
these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior
to recording the plat.
STORM DRAINAGE
1. A conceptual drainage plan and report is required to be submitted with the formal application for the
plat. The project will be required to verify that the existing storm drainage system meets the criteria of
the proposal. A drainage control plan, designed per the City of Renton Amendments to the King County
Surface Water Manual 2009, is required.
2. The conceptual drainage report and plan submitted did not include conceptual sizing calculations for
the detention. The plan and report did not address the individual lot treatment. Both requirements are
a condition for preliminary plat approval.
3. The storm drainage plan needs to address how the roof runoff from the new lots will be handled.
4. The Surface Water SDC fees are $1,012 per lot. These fees are collected at the time a construction
permit is issued.
GENERAL
1. All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals,
prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards, by a licensed Civil Engineer.
2. All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical Control
Network.
3. Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of the fee
must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the remainder when the
permits are issued. There may be additional fees for water service related expenses. See Drafting
Standards.
City o4ton Department of Community & Economic4selopment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I . °^ •� -�
COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 21, 2011
APPLICATION NO: LUA10-090, ECF, PVP
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 2411
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner
PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons
PROJECT TITLE: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
SITE AREA: 293,152 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 12xx 148`s Avenue NE (parcel # 1123459065)
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision
of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The project site is located within
the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in
area to 8,706 square feet. Access to the lots would be provided via extension oPasco PI NE eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE.
The applicant is proposing clustering for Lots 1-5, due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site, whereby R-8
development standards can be applied. The site contains a Category 2 and Category 3 wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill
the smaller Category 3 wetland. Mitigation is propsoed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the larger Category
2 wetland in addition to buffer enhancement.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major information
Impacts impacts Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Li ht/Glore
Recreation
utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Histaric/Culturai
Preservation
Airport Environment
10, 000 Feet
14, 000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional iipformotion is needed to properly assess this proposal.
5It- Wit/
Signature df Doctor or Authorized-RepresentatW Date
1 0 0 S# 878
JL
t
XT T O
TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE
Project Name:
Olympus Villa PP
-
Project Address:
12xx 148'h Avenue NE
Contact Person:
Bill Finkbeiner
Permit Number:
LUA 10-990
Project Description:
Land Use Type:
X Residential
❑ Retail
❑ Non -retail
Calculation:
(11)9.57 = 105.27 ADT
11 lot SFR preliminary plat home
105.27 x $75.00 = $7,895.25
Transportation
Mitigation Fee:
Calculated by:
Date of Payment:
Method of Calculation:
X ITE Trip Generation Manual, 81" Edition
❑ Traffic Study
❑ Other
(210) SFR 9.57 trips / du
$7,895.25
K. Kittrick Date: 1/11/11
City o rr ton Department of Community & Economic elopment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:' lie. I,'—
COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 21, 2011
APPLICATION NO: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 2011
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner
PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons
PROJECT TITLE: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger {
SITE AREA: 293,152 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 12xx 148th Avenue NE (parcel # 1123059065)
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SERA) Review for the subdivision
of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The project site is located within
the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in
area to 8,706 square feet. Access to the lots would be provided via extension oPasco PI NE eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE_
The applicant is proposing clustering for Lots 1-5, due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site, whereby R-8
development standards can be applied. The site contains a Category 2 and Category 3 wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill
the smaller Category 3 wetland. Mitigation is propsoed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the larger Category
2 wetland in addition to buffer enhancement.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable Probable More
Minor Major information
Imports impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
i �A V 41k1E`ET x6l Ei 7,?�, )C. L-� 1/11/11
S. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major information
impacts impacts Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Li hi/Glare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10, ODD Feet
14,WO Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
City o4ton Department of Community & EconomAelopment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:ft
COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 21, 2011
APPLICATION NO: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 2011
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner
PROJECT MANAGER: Ro e Ti ns
PROJECT TITLE: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT REVIEWER: irneta Henninger rr
SITE AREA: 293,152 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA gross): N/A
LOCATION: 12xx 148th Avenue NE (parcel # 1123059065)
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision
of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The project site is located within
the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in
area to 8,706 square feet. Access to the lots would be provided via extension oPasco PI NE eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE.
The applicant is proposing clustering for Lots 1-5, due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site, whereby R-8
development standards can be applied. The site contains a Category 2 and Category 3 wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill
the smaller Category 3 wetland_ Mitigation is propsoed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the larger Category
2 wetland in addition to buffer enhancement.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Elementof the
Environment
Probable Probable More
Minor major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Forth
Air
water
Plants
Lond/Shorel6e use
Animals
Environments! Health
Energy/
Naturol Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Elementof the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
impacts Impacts Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Li ht/GlGre
Recreation
utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14;000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional informatiorAt needed to prlpperly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Date
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
"It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future residents
that would utilize existing City park and recreation facilities and programs. The
City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee of $530.76 per each new single family
lot to address these potential impacts."
Parks Mitigation Foe
City oJ&ton Department of Community & Economi4relopment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: par' �
COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 21, 2011
APPLICATION NO: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 2011
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner
PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons
PROJECT TITLE: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
SITE AREA: 293,152 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 12xx 1481h Avenue NE (parcel # 1123059065)
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision
of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The project site is located within
the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in
area to 8,706 square feet. Access to the lots would be provided via extension oPasco PI NE eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE.
The applicant is proposing clustering for Lots 1-5, due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site, whereby R-8
development standards can be applied_ The site contains a Category 2 and Category 3 wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill
the smaller Category 3 wetland_ Mitigation is propsoed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the larger Category
2 wetland in addition to buffer enhancement.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Forth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Housin
Aesthetics
Light/Glare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Fnvironment
1 0 DOO Feet
14,OOOFeet
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
�' i
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where gdditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
i_
:nate of Director or
presentative
Date 1-24
/
LETTER OF TRANS&TAL
To:
City of Renton
Attention:
Olympus Villa PreliminarKl t
Date:
]an 19, 2011
Subject:
Olympus Villa PreliminarKl t
o RFV!
.lob No.
08606.10.38 1j
Transmittal is Via: ❑ US Mail ❑ Courier ❑ Hand -Carried
We are sending you the following: ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover
❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples
❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ❑
Copies Date No. Description
Green folder with comment letter and markups
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ Specification
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use
❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comments ❑
Remarks:
Signed: DR✓%d R. Fulfodt. P L..S.
Copy To:
If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at once
< _. �._ , w k... W.d
PACE Engineers, Inc.
luV Q ?[! 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300
PACE Kirkland WA 98033
BUILDING DIVISION Phone: 425.827.2014 Fax: 425.827.5043
PACE
Ai Engineering Seances Company
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat LUAIO-090
Prepared and reviewed by Fred Williamson & David Fulton P.L.S. 9 32429
PACE Engineers, Inc. Job 4 08606.10.38
11255 Kirkland Way Suite 300
Kirkland, Wa. 98033-6715
Document Review:
Completed general review of preliminary plat.
Sheet 1:
Engineers Planners Surveyors
Al
January 18, 2011'x/
■ Legal has minor errors based on property description contained in Commonwealth Title
commitment Order No. NWRT-40052244.
■ Restriction No. 3 has error in recording number.
■ Scale of text and north arrow shown on Vicinity Map should be scaled up to 0.08" high.
■ See sheet 1 mark-ups for these edits
q}1PPt ?.
■ Need to shown basis of bearings and ties to City of Renton control points used.
■ Easements over Lots 3 and 4 should be dimensioned and we are not sure why there are A
and B designations shown. Are they to be keyed to notes on Sheet 1 or 2?
■ Various text for lot numbers or tax parcels should be moved.
■ Right of Way widths should be added at transition points.
■ See sheet 2 mark-ups for these edits.
General comments:
■ Dimensions for the exterior boundary shown on sheet 2 closes mathematically.
■ All Tracts and Critical Areas appear to be shown and labeled.
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat LUA-xx-xxx
PACE Engineers, Inc.
Page 1 Kirkland Office
11255 Kirkland Way I Suite 300 1 Kirkland, WA 98033
p 425.827.2014 1 ; 425.827.5043
paccengrs.com
Carrie Olson
From: Carrie Olson
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 11:37 AM
To: Bob MacOnie
Cc: 'David Fulton'; Rocale Timmons
Subject: RE: Preliminary Plat Approval for Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
Attachments: IP048501.TIF; ]p048502.TIF; 1p048503.TIF
Hi Bob, Please find attached, the property services review comments on this preliminary plat
for your review. I will forward these comments on to Rocale Timmons. I also made a folder
and used the next Land Record File Number for plats which is LND-10-0485 for this project.
Please let us know if you have additional comments. Thanks.
Rocale, Besides the comments above I noticed the following comment should be included:
Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-10-090-FP and LND-
10-0485 respectively, on the final plat submittal (all submittal sheets).
Carrie K.Olson
Engineering Specialist
Community & Economic Development Dept.
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98057
colson@rentonwa.gov
425-430-7235 Office
425-430-7300 FAX
-----Original Message -----
From: Carrie Olson
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:05 PM
To: 'David Fulton'
Cc: Bob MacOnie
Subject: RE: Preliminary Plat Approval for Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
Hi David, It was nice to meet you today. Thanks for picking up the green folder this
morning. You predicted you would complete the review and have the comments back to me by
next Wednesday, January 19, 2011.
Also, I am attaching the drawings you requested me to send to you via e-mail. I decided to
send them all. If you need more information or drawings, let me know. Have a good day.
Carrie K.Olson
Engineering Specialist
Community & Economic Development Dept.
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98057
colson@rentonwa.Rov
425-430-7235 Office
425-430-7300 FAX
-----Original Message -----
From: David Fulton fmailto:davidf(,p aceengrs.coml
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 3:07 PM
To: Carrie Olson; Bob MacOnie
Cc: Fred Williamson
Subject: RE: Preliminary Plat Approval for Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
Hi Carrie,
I can stop by and pick the package up tomorrow about 10:30.
David R. Fulton P.L.S.
PACE Engineers, Inc.
11255 Kirkland Way Suite 300
Kirkland, WA 98033
p. 425.827.2014 1 f. 425.827.5043
paceengrs.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Carrie Olson [mailto:COlson@Rentonwa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 2:12 PM
To: Bob MacOnie
Cc: David Fulton
Subject: Preliminary Plat Approval for Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
Hi Bob, Please find attached this project's review sheet for your information. I left a
phone message for David Fulton from PACE to pick up this Green Folder Review.
Carrie K.Olson
Engineering Specialist
Community & Economic Development Dept.
1055 South Grady Way
Renton WA 98057
colson@rentonwa.gov
425-430-7235 Office
425-430-7300 FAX
-----Original Message -----
From: pdecopv(@rentonwa.gov jmailto:pdecopy rentonwa.gov1
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 1:53 PM
To: Carrie Olson
Subject:
This E-mail was sent from "DevelopmentServices" (Aficio MP 4000).
Scan Date: 01.12.2011 13:53:17 (-0800)
Queries to: pdecopy@rentonwa.gov
2
City o*ton Department of Community & Economi#elopment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `��} /�<"
COMMENTS DUE. JANUARY 21, 2011
APPLICATION NO: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 2011
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner
PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons
PROJECT TITLE: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
SITE AREA: 293,152 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 12xx 148`h Avenue NE (parcel # 1123059065)
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision
of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The project site is located within
the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in
area to 8,706 square feet. Access to the lots would be provided via extension oPasco PI NE eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE.
The applicant is proposing clustering for Lots 1-5, due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site, whereby R-8
development standards can be applied. The site contains a Category 2 and Category 3 wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill
the smaller Category 3 wetland. Mitigation is propsoed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the larger Category
2 wetland in addition to buffer enhancement.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable
Environment Minor
Impacts
Probable More
Major information
Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plan is
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmentof Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
Airport Environment
10, 000 Feet
I4, 000 Feet
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the
Environment
Probable Probable More
Minor Major information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Li hVGlare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Historic/cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10, 000 Feet
I4, 000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
City ojeton Department of Community & Economi4elopment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -
` 'l.: �''1`
COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 21, 2011
APPLICATION NO: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 2011
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner
PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons
PROJECT TITLE. Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
SITE AREA: 293,152 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 12xx 148`h Avenue NE (parcel # 1123059065)
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL_ The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision
of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The project site is located within
the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in
area to 8,706 square feet. Access to the lots would be provided via extension oPasco PI NE eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE.
The applicant is proposing clustering for Lots 1-5, due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site, whereby R-8
development standards can be applied. The site contains a Category 2 and Category 3 wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill
the smaller Category 3 wetland. Mitigation is propsoed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the larger Category
2 wetland in addition to buffer enhancement.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major information
impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major information
Impacts impacts Necessary
Nousin
Aesthetics
Li ht/Glore
Recreation
utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10 000 Feet
14, 000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areaswh a additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
l
Signature of DireCto r Authorized Representative Date
CITY OF RENTON 0
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 19, 2011
TO: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner
FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector
SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
Environmental Impact Comments:
1. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $488.00 per single family unit. This
fee is paid prior to recording the plat.
Code Related Comments:
The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up
to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600
square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire
hydrant is required within 300 -feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire
flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Lots 6 through 11 shall have a minimum of 1 -inch water meters
to accommodate their required fire sprinkler systems. A water availability certificate is
required from Icing County Water District 90.
2. Per city street standards, all proposed homes on lots 6 through 11 shall require an
approved fire sprinkler system due to narrow street standard. All fire access
roadways are required to have a minimum of 25 -foot inside and 45 -foot outside
turning radius.
CT:ct
olympussp
:OF
City 00ton Department of Community & Econom*elopment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F-
COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 21, 2011
APPLICATION NO: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 2011
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner
PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons
PROJECT TITLE: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
SITE AREA: 293,152 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross). N/A
LOCATION: 12xx 148th Avenue NE (parcel It 1123059065)
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision
of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The project site is located within
the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in
area to 8,706 square feet. Access to the lots would be provided via extension oPasco PI NE eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE.
The applicant is proposing clustering for Lots 1-5, due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site, whereby R-8
development standards can be applied. The site contains a Category 2 and Category 3 wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill
the smaller Category 3 wetland. Mitigation is propsoed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the larger Category
2 wetland in addition to buffer enhancement.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
Energy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major information
impacts Impacts Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Li hi/Glare
Recreation
Utilities
Transportation
Public Services
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
wo /Ve
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized
Zh2z
Date
Denis Law
lt O
Mayor l
January 7, 2011
Department of Community and Economic Development
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Gayle Morgan
Routing Coordinator
Issaquah School District #411
8052 nd Avenue NW
Issaquah, WA 98027
Subject: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
LUA10-090, ECF, PP
The City of Renton's Department of Community and Economic Development (CED) has
received an application for an 11 -lot single-family development located at 12xx 148th
Avenue Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. 1
5
In order to process this application, CED needs to know which Issaquah schools would be
attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the
appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, City of Renton,
GED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98057 by January 21,
2011_
Elementary 5
Middle Schoc
High School:
Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students
estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No
Any Com
Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding
this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7219.
Sincerely,
lRolce Timmons
Associate Planner
Enclosure
Renton City Hail • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 0 rentonwa.gov
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �.
COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 211 2011
APPLICATION NO: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 7, 2011
APPLICANT: Bill Finkbeiner
PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons
PROJECT TITLE: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT REVIEWER: Arneta Henninger
SITE AREA: 293,152 square feet
EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A
LOCATION: 12xx 148th Avenue NE (parcel # 1123059065)
PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the subdivision
of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into I 1 lots for the future construction of single family residences. The project site is located within
the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in
area to A,7ja6_5quare feet. Access to the lots would be provided via extension oPasco PI NE eventually connecting to dile Ave NE.
The applicant is proposing clustering for Lots 1-5, due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site, whereby R-8
development standards can be applied_ The site ins a Category 2 and Category 3 wetland. The applicant is proposing to fill
the smaller Category 3 wetland. Mitigation i propsoed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the larger Category
2 wetland in addition to buffer enhancement.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major information
impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth
Air
Water
Plants
Land/Shoreline Use
Animals
Environmental Health
E=nergy/
Natural Resources
B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Housing
Aesthetics
Light/Glare
Recreation
Utilities
Trans ortotion
Public Services
Historic/Cultural
Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
'11 I w/i1
Signature Dir or or Authorized kepresentative r i date
CON5157I OVERYIE W:
2orring/i Use: The subJert'lie Le designated Firlds11W 4 dwelling grits per acre JR -41 on
the City , r Renton Comprehensive land Use Map and ReiHizo4 a:'— Den Slly
IRLDI on the Giw' 7aning Ni
fn.lrenmenpi D ... men+a that
Evaluate the Praposed Project: r—cunni-tal ISEPAI ChecI
Daelopment Regulations
Us" Far Prolact Mlttaii The project wT be subject to the CltysSEPA Ordinance. RMC 4-2-11CA and
Other applicable cores...d regulations as appropriate.
Ptnppsld Mitri,m an Measure.: The IOIIOwing Mltlgadon Measures will III be imposed on the proposed
ecl.
prajThese rec9mmended Mlttgatir,n Measures address protect impacts not
covered by limung codes and regulatlnns as cited above,
• the opolicnnr mrilrepiinclJo ppy rhe Poproperme Tmnspron'tron rdn'l rian Tea,
• the scpFiconc Will 6e regoired it pey the oopnap' oc. Fire mitiyoNm Fee; end
• The app Ji 'AV b<required Inppy the wpral pii nkS Mhivripn Feel
Comment, on the aba.. applkatmn most Jr. submltied in -El +a Parole Tlmenam, Ap-1.11¢ Pla mar, CEO —
Flanning Dal$ton, 1055 South Grady Wax, Pardon, WA SB057, by 5:00 PM on Mini 21, loll. Tho molter I. N.
to ntatlaely scheduled fof a public hearing p. March 1, 2011. at 9:W a.m.. Cpnncll Chambers. $Lamb Floor, Renton
City half, 1055 . th Grady Way. R4 Man. N you are inlerested in atl,nding the hearing. plea'¢ contact the
Develerme it services Lnvlsion to ensue{ has the hearing has not been rescheduled at (42514-24-7282 !r comments
cannot be mbmltted In went,{ by the date Indicated otic-, you may still appear at the hearing and p—em your
comments an the proposal before the Nearing Eonhher IfV.o have questions armor this proposal, or .;ah to be made
a party of record and rete we
addi ...I hformaLlon by all. please contact the Pini—manager. Anyone who submits
written mmil M11 automatically Inatome a party of record and will be noti Red aF any dallier, on this project.
CONTACT PERSON: Racale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel: 1425) 430.7219;
Erol: rtlmmans@reritonwa.gov
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
�4 = p TEFL irk u, ,;-•�,.`: 'j•
..,. �PelvtpN:AY.Eno as THE cuxvl:, �a
0
City aF ji
. 1
NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF
NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS -M)
GATE: January 7, 2011
LANO D5E NUMBER: LUA10o90, ECF, PP
PROJECT NAME: Olymcosvilli Predminary Plat
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is req,il llrlg Preliminary plat approval and Emin-mental ISEPAI
Reelew'or the subdivision of an uITting 677 are parcel Into 31 lot, let the fulurl cnnstructl— pl single family
d7h.
proiecl mi Is Ili Wilhin the Residenlla{ - 4 ll dwe;ling tmil, per tore ineing d,atraldCn- The
proposed Ines will ranee In size From 5.561 square feet in area to 3,706 square leet- Aocel. W the lots would Se
prolided.la e—holm, miPl NE ii—Willy, connerling to Nile Ave NE. The applicant 1, proposing 6tintring for Lots
1-5. due ti, eshting road alignments aid :6tical ares. on alta, whereby I drrrlopment standards can he applied. The
site romalm , category 2 and Category 3 wltiand. The appllcanl b proposing t, fill the smaller Category 3 wadiTd.
M30gatlon Is proproad in the form of the aeation of raw wetland adjacent to the larger Calizi 2 wetland In addition
to berrer enhancement.
PROJECT LOCATION: Ila, 14e Avenue N£
OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICAPICtE, MITIGATED IONS-Mj: As the Lead Agency. the Nry of Renton has
determined that signi!Icant mofe,,mi impacts ere unlikely to result From the proposed project- ThenFore. a.
permltced are
the RCN 43.21[.110, the City or Perlin Is using the Optional ON5-M process to Inotice that a DNS -
M is alinly, iq be Isol Comment periods for the prpleof and the proposed Cli a integrated Imo a single
cirrimal period. There will be no comment period tolliti the Ls.uar,ce of the Ttral ld Delermination of Non
SIgNRcance.MiNRated {DNS�MJ. A S4 -day appeal perlad 411 fallow the IS'W nce Ct the DNSM.
PERMIT APPLICJ.TION DAT[: December 72, 2010
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPUCb TION: January 7. 2011
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Wil FlAbelner, Flnbel., De.alapini 12011 Bel -Rad Road ii
Bellew., WA halos; Eml: billf@IMgbeinerd—I.I himt.rnm
Plimiloil low Requeeted: Enelro—i(SEPAI Ravlew, Prallmlmary Plat approval
all Perrnila which may he requleed: Building and Conetroegnn Parini
Beque.tad Sbadlea: Welland SAbdy and Dralruge Real
Loratll where applicitlan mar,
be renewed. Depanrnent of Cpmmo it a E-namk Development i Itaknning
ol.blon, Sixth Flaor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, flim. WA
91
PUBLIC NEARING:�j hllc hearine Es hn[a0v¢!. s[hltlNedlpr Mam_ja] 2011 before [he Rer,mr,
Nearin[ E.aminer In Ramon Cauncll Chambers
floor Hearings begin at 9:DD a.m. on
the 7th r of the new Raman City Nall locatad at 1055 South Grady way
IF ypa would Ilk, al be made a party of record tc receive Arher aemcermitum on this proposed pr lea. complete this
Fpem and return to: Gty or Seri CEO - Panning Division, 1055 SO - Geady Way, Renton, WA 96057.
N.,mil le Nu.: Olympus Will preliminary PhULUA10-090, ECF, PP
NAME —T
MAILING ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
CERTIFICATION
I,iL hereby certify that --�3 copies of the above document
were posted in conspicuous places or nearby a descrl ed property o
Date: Signe
Signe
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
Ss
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 3) c:ji t- ex -ii, 1AV t\ s ori
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
D ••.ouvilklill
Olj
s`g eNotary Public in and for the State of Washington
T= .40 so
A r • V.. Notary (Print):er
A �rara
�, My appointment expires:
0
0
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 7th day of January, 2011, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing
Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, Site Plan documents. This information was sent to:
Name
Representing
Agencies
See Attached
Bill Finkbeiner
Contact/Applicant
Robert Anderson & Gale Miner
Owners
300' Surrounding Property Owners - NOA only
See attached
(Signature of Sender):
STATE OF WASH INGTO
COUNTY OF KING
I certify that I know or I
signed this instrument Q11M u...,..,...b. u ,� �.. w. ,.,�, -••--_-_..__. , ___ _ _. _. _
mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: J'3tti 1f
Notary
is in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print):
My appointment expires:
Project Name: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
Project Number: LUA10-090, ECF, PP
template - affidavit of service by mailing
0
0
City of
NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF
NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS -M)
DATE:
January 7, 2011
LAND USE NUMBER:
LUA10-090, ECF, PP
PROJECT NAME:
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval and Environmental (SEPA)
Review for the subdivision of an existing 6.72 acre parcel into 11 lots for the future construction of single family
residences. The project site is located within the Residential - 4 (R-4) dwelling units per acre zoning designation. The
proposed lots would range in size from 5,563 square feet in area to 8,705 square feet. Access to the lots would be
provided via extension oPasco PI NE eventually connecting to Nile Ave NE. The applicant is proposing clustering for Lots
1-5, due to existing road alignments and critical areas on site, whereby R-8 development standards can be applied. The
site contains a Category 2 and Category 3 wetland. The applicant is proposing to FP the smaller Category 3 wetland.
Mitigation is propsoed in the form of the creation of new wetland adjacent to the larger Category 2 wetland in addition
to buffer enhancement.
PROJECT LOCATION: 12xx 148" Avenue NE
OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS -M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has
determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as
permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS -M process to give notice that a DNS -
M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS -M are integrated into a single
comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non -
Significance -Mitigated (DNS -M), A 14 -day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS -M.
PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 22, 2010
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 7, 2011
APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Bill Finkbeiner, Finbeiner Development; 12011 Bel -Red Road 6206;
Bellevue, WA 98005; Eml: billf@finkbeinerdevelopment.com
Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Preliminary Plat approval
Other Permits which may be required: Building and Construction Permits
Requested Studies: Wetland Study and Drainage Report
Location where application may
be reviewed: Department of Community & Economic Development {CED} — Planning
Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA
98057
PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for March 1. 2021 before the Renton
Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 a.m. on
the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hail located at 1055 South Grady Way.
If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this
form and return to: City of Renton, CED — Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057,
Name/File No.: Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat/LUA10-090, ECF, PP
NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
0 0
CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW:
Zoning/Land Use: The subject site is designated Residential -4 dwelling units per acre (R-4) on
the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential Low Density
IRLD} on the City's Zoning Map.
Environmental Documents that
Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist
Development Regulations
Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-2-110A and
other appiicabie codes and regulations as appropriate.
Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed
project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not
covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above.
• The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee;
• The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee; and
The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee.
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rocaie Timmons, Associate Planner, CED —
Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on January 21, 2011. This matter is also
tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on March 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton
City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the
Development Services Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-7282. If comments
cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your
comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made
a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits
written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project.
CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219;
Eml: rtimmons@rentonwa.gov
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I
Wup
ms`s �anr°�'. i;. s,ci +sr
0
AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING
(ERC DETERMINATIONS)
Dept. of Ecology *
WDFW - Larry Fisher*
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. "
Environmental Review Section
1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201
Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
PO Box 47703
Issaquah, WA 98027
39015-172 nd Avenue SE
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Auburn, WA 98092
WSDOT Northwest Region *
Duwamish Tribal Office *
Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program
Attn: Ramin Paxooki
4717 W Marginal Way SW
Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
King Area Dev. Serv., MS -240
Seattle, WA 98106-1514
39015 172"d Avenue SE
PO Box 330310
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers *
KC Wastewater Treatment Division *
Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation"
Seattle District Office
Environmental Planning Supervisor
Attn: Gretchen Kaehler
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
Ms. Shirley Marroquin
PO Box 48343
PO Box C-3755
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
Seattle, WA 98124
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
Boyd Powers *
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Serv.
City of Newcastle
City of Kent
Attn: SEPA Section
Attn.- Steve Roberge
Attn: Mr, Fred Satterstrom, AICP
900 Oakesdale Ave. SW
Director of Community Development
Acting Community Dev. Director
Renton, WA 98055-1219
13020 Newcastle Way
220 Fourth Avenue South
Newcastle, WA 98059
Kent, WA 98032-5895
Metro Transit
Puget Sound Energy
City of Tukwila
Senior Environmental Planner
Municipal Liaison Manager
Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
Gary Kriedt
Joe Jainga
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431
PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W
Tukwila, WA 98188
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Bellevue, WA 98009-0868
Seattle Public Utilities
Real Estate Services
Attn: SEPA Coordinator
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
*Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities
will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the notice of application.
template - affidavit of service by mailing
1023059021 1023059023WEST EAST RENTON LLC 1023059189
CAM
WEGNER BRETT+MARY K CAM
MERIC CAMPBELL RICK BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION
665 NILE AVE NE 5605 NE 7TH PL
RENTON WA 98059 9720 NE 120TH PL #100 RENTON WA 98059
KIRKLAND WA 98034
1023059259 1023059368 1123059002
POWERS JACK M+DENISE T RICK BURNSTEAD CONSTRUCTION SHENK DAVID
703 NILE AVE NE 11980 NE 24TH ST #200 702 NILE AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059 BELLEVUE WA 98005 RENTON WA 98059
1123059010 1123059032 1123059034
JOHNSEINE ROBERT A FAEHNRICH JARROD+MELANIE ELLIOTT TIMOTHY A+BARBARA
764 NILE AVE NE 751 ORCAS AVE NE 5735 NE STH ST
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059
1123059035 1123059038 1123059039
COLEMAN DION P CHILDS RITA KRISTINE WOO RAYMOND
5821 NE 8TH ST 764 NILE AVE NE 14404 SE 87TH ST
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 NEWCASTLE WA 98059
1123059040 1123059049 1123059053
WELLS BRENTON T NEWHART MANFRED & MARTA HOOVER RODDIE
5865 NE 8TH ST 5841 NE 8TH ST 758 NILE AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059
1123059061 1123059065 1123059066
WOO RAYMOND ANDERSON ROBERT HILLS WALTER W
764 ORCAS AVE NE PO BOX 353 763 ORCAS AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059 MAPLE VALLEY WA 98038 RENTON WA 98059
1123059068 1123059071 1123059077
NEWMAN JON+LINDA CHILDS KEITH L+RITA K MITCHELL FLORENCE
8070 LANGSTON RD S 12004 148TH AVE SE PO BOX 2374
SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056
1123059084 1123059086 1123059087
DHALIWAL MAJOR+BRAR BHUPIND LAWLESS LEE LOUIS WINTERMYER EDWARD
12202 148TH AVE SE 757 ORCAS AVE NE 12050 148TH AVE SE
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059
1123059092 5214500770 5214510020
JOHNSEINE ROBERT A MAUREEN HIGHLANDS HOA INC LOCKE WESLEY+M SUSANNE C
684 NILE AVE NE C/O BRINK PROP MGMT 656 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059 11555 SE STH ST #130 RENTON WA 98059
BELLEVUE WA 98004
5214510030 5214510040 5214510050
CHUNG KAYU+CARRIE KOPERSKI OJERIO ALBERT M+AMIE I PARMAR CHETAN N+GEETA YADAV
662 ROSARIO PL NE 668 ROSARIO PL NE 674 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059
5214510060
MCINTYRE BRANDEN
702 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510090
KITCHEN MONICA R+MICKEL C+T
713 SHADOW AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510120
PLUNTZE JANET E+GHOLSTON JE
677 SHADOW AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510170
KRAIL ROBERT J
651 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510200
FLETCHER MINA L+WILLIAM V
667 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510230
DEAVENPORT TRACEY
703 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
9
5214510070
CHISM BILL+ANNA
708 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510100
MENGUITA VOLTAIRE C+MYLAINE
707 SHADOW AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510130
AGUILA ALEXIS C+MICHELLE P
671 SHADOW AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510180
CUNNINGHAM ROBERT G+JOANNA
657 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510210
FAN STEVE T
673 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510240
A PRATHER ANDREW M+DINAH M
709 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510260
BOUVIER KENNETH D+CHRISTINA
721 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510290
HUYNH JASON T
6122 NE 7TH PL
RENTON WA 98059
5214520020
NADOYAN KLAVDIYA
769 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510270
MILLS CARMON
751 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510300
HONG KHA H+UT T PHAN
6128 NE 7TH PL
RENTON WA 98059
5214520030
KOUZMANOV NIKOLAY+DRINGOVA
775 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510080
LAM YU KEI+CINDY FANG
692 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510110
WONG KENNETH
701 SHADOW AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510140
TRAN KENNEDY+KIM DINH
665 SHADOW AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510190
HAMMOND ANDREW C+KRISTI
663 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510220
ZAMORA FABIO A JR+LENNIE MA
679 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510250
CURRAN KERRY M+ZHAO XIA
715 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214510280
BENJAMIN MARIA C
757 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214520010
HAMMOND RYAN+WANG YANXIN
763 ROSARIO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
5214520040
VISWANATHAN CLEMENT E+ADLIN
6200 NE 7TH CT
RENTON WA 98059
5214520180 5214520190 7708201180
TRAN TIMOTHY SHANE MARK R+TANYA M PALANCHUK GEORGIY&NATALYA
6129 NE 7TH CT 6123 NE 7TH CT 715 NILE AVE NE
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059
0
0
9477930150 9477940160 9477940170
BEYAZ LEYLA DEA ROGER HARRIS MICHAEL J+VALERIE K
631 QUINCY AVE NE 652 PASCO PL NE 658 PASCO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059
9477940180
CREWS RICHARD E+NORMA R
5920 NE 7TH ST
RENTON WA 98059
9477940210
HU HONGGANG
677 PASCO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
9477940190
PANG TUREN
5914 NE 7TH ST
RENTON WA 98059
9477940220
CHAN LOUISE YIN LEE
671 PASCO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
9477940200
TSE CHUN HING
5908 NE 7TH ST
RENTON WA 98059
9477940230
LU DAT H+CHIEM MY THU
665 PASCO PL NE
RENTON WA 98059
9477940240 9477940250 9477940540
BALZER ]ERRY R+DEASON 30LI S RACINE MARC A+KIMBERLY G WINDWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOC
659 PASCO PL NE 653 PASCO PL NE PO BOX 3506
RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98059 RENTON WA 98056
Denis Law
Mayor City
L
Department of Community and Economic Development
January 7, 2011 Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Bill Finkbeiner
Finkbeiner Development
12011 Bel -Red Road #206
Bellevue, WA 98005
Subject: Notice of Com plete Application
Olympus Villa Preliminary Plat, LUA10-090, ECF, PP
Dear Mr. Finkbeiner:
The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application
is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review.
It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on
January 31, 2011. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information
is required to continue processing your application.
In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on March 1, 2011 at
9:00 a.m., Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,
Renton. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at
the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled
hearing.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Roc le Timmons
As ociate Planner
cc: Robert Anderson & Gale Miner/ owner(s)
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
dir
City of Renton
LAND USE PERMIT, .f
MASTER -APPLICATI011"lli
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
NAME: Robert Anderson and Gale Miner
ADDRESS: 13607 4615' Ave SE
CITY: North Bend ZIP: 98045
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
NAME: Bill Finkbeiner
COMPANY (if applicable):
ADDRESS: 12011 Bel —Red Road, Suite 206
CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98005
TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425.454.7777
CONTACT PERSON
NAME: Bill Finkbeiner
COMPANY (if applicable):
ADDRESS:
CITY: ZIP:
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS:
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Olympus Villa
PROJECTIADDRESS (S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
12xxx 1481h Ave NE, Renton 98059
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
1123059065
EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant
PROPOSED LAND USE(S): 11 lot residential plat
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
RLD (Residential Low Density)
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable)
EXISTING ZONING: R4
PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):
SITE AREA (in square feet):�� ,
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
DEDICATED: y_g, SQ FT
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCE=SS EASEMENTS:
11 6/0 5ck FT
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable) ;t.6 units/acre
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) 11
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): t I
CAI)ocuments and Settingslthollenbeck\L.ocal Settingffemporary Internet FileSlContent.OutlooklZ4LW2MVR1Aiiderson Miner masterapp.doc - I -
PR CT INFORMA1
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 0
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable):
NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable):
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW
PROJECT (if applicable):
is
ION (continued)
PROJECT VALUE:
+ LL -
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):
❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE
❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO
❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA
sq. ft.
❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD
sq. ft.
❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION
sq. ft.
❑ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES
sq. ft.
6ya=0
WETLANDS aprox iE sq. ft.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included
SITUATE IN THE _SW_ QUARTER OF SECTION _11_, TOWNSHIP _23_, RANGE _5_, IN THE CITY OF
RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. Pi _6i-1 A41, ,"e- y 1 ''kj T 3.
2.Nl%e DNS-rENTA
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ -54°'�9
4.
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Namels) (fi 1 I�fASf_4 L_ MtYO—A , declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
Washington that I am (please check one) tf the current owner of the prop
for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing
in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I ce
sigr
involved in this application or the authorized representative to act
ements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are
�F1 know or have sfactory eviden
-
sinstrument and c le i to is�/h�e+r�/thLe,ir free and vo un ar
uses and pur. o a nti ed it th �Fb( &Lt. HOLLENBECK
STATE OF WASHINGTON
jr
/ NOTARY PUBLIC
btic in a f to a of was inMynC4MMIS5ION EXPIRES
-26-14
Notary(Print) fes` L L ""
My appointment expires:
C:1Documents and SettingslthollenbecfilLocal settingslTemporary Internet FiieslContell t.OutlookVALW2MVR1Anderson Miner masterapp.doc - 2 -
41
PREAPPLICATION MEETING
FOREST HILLS PLAT
NE 7th Place & Pasco Avenue NE
CITY 4F RENTON
Department of Community and Economic Development'
Current Planning Division
PREI O-033
September 09, 2010
Contact Information:
Planner Rocale Timmons Phone: 425.430.7219
Public Works Reviewer: Kayren Kittrick Phone:
Fire Prevention Reviewer: Dave Pargas Phone: 425.430.7023
Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnelf Phone: 425.430.7290
Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference.
Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who
work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply
for land use and/or environmental permits.
Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call
and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened
before making all of the required copies.
The pre -application meeting is informal and non --binding. The comments provided
on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of
review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly
amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in
effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary
is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g.,
Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department
of Community and Economic Development Administrator, Public Works
Administrator and City Council).
w
y a i CITY OF RENTON
' FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
'NTo/� MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 9, 2010
TO: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner
FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector
SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for Forest Hill Short Plat
The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up
to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600
square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire
hydrant is required within 300 -feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire
flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. A water availability certificate is required from King County
Water District 90.
2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $488.00 per single family unit. This
fee is paid prior to recording the plat.
3. City street standards do not allow dead end streets that exceed 700 -feet in length.
Secondary emergency access is required as this proposed plat greatly exceeds 700 -
feet. Dead end streets between the lengths of 300 and 700 -feet require full cul-de-
sac turnaround with a minimum of 90 -foot diameters. All fire access roadways are
required to be a minimum of 20 -feet wide with 25 -foot inside and 45 -foot outside
turning radius.
CT:ct
foresthillsp
f
ty of
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY ���e
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: September 1, 2010
TO: Rocale Timmons, Planner
FROM: Arneta Henninger, Plan Reviewer 4W
SUBJECT: Forest Hills Plat
Nile Ave NE & NE 7th PI & Pasco PI NE - Parcel #117-3059065
PRE 10-033
NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and
non-binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision -
makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design
changes required by City staff or made by the applicant.
have completed a preliminary review for the above -referenced 11 lot plat proposal located in
the vicinity of Nile Ave NE, NE 7th PI & Pasco PI NE all in SW % of Sect. 11, Twp 23N Rng 5 E. The
following comments are based on the pre -application submittal made to the City of Renton by
the applicant.
WATER:
• This site is located in the Water District 90 water service boundary. A water availability
certificate is required from King County Water District 90.
• This site is not located in the Aquifer Protection Zone.
• The project will need to provide domestic service and fire service to serve the proposed
development.
• Per the City Fire Marshal, the preliminary fire flow requirement for a single family home is
1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and
basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow
would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300 -feet of the
proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Lateral spacing
of fire hydrants is predicated on hydrants being located at street intersections.
SANITARY SEWER:
There is an existing S" sanitary sewer main Pasco PI NE. See City of Renton engineering
plans # S-2790 for the as -built.
Forest Hills Plat
Page 2 of 2
September 1, 2010
• The proposed project needs to show how they propose to serve the new development with
sanitary sewer service to all of the lots.
• The proposed development will be required to install a sewer main in Pasco PI NE extended
to the north property line, and a sewer main extended to the west, the full length of the
roadway.
The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on the size of the (each and all)
domestic water meter(s). These fees are collected at the time a construction permit is
issued.
STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
• Street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving will be required to be
installed on Nile Ave NE across the full frontage of the parcel being developed.
• The project needs to provide right-of-way vehicular access, from Nile Ave NE through the
plat to Pasco Ave NE, with curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
• Street lighting will be required to be installed.
• Traffic mitigation fees will apply. Traffic mitigation fees of approximately $75 per net new
average daily trip will be required prior to recording of the plat as a condition of the plat_
• All new electrical, phone, and cable services and lines must be undergrounded. The
construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton
public works inspector prior to recording the plat.
STORM DRAINAGE:
• There are existing storm drainage facilities in Pasco PI NE. See drawing # R-2790.
• A conceptual drainage plan and report is required to be submitted with the formal
application for the plat. The project will be required to verify that the existing storm
drainage system meets the criteria of the proposal. A drainage control plan designed per
the City of Renton Amendments to the King County Surface Water Manual 2009 is required.
• The conceptual storm drainage plan needs to address how the roof runoff from the new lots
will be handled.
• The Surface Water SDC fees are $1,012 per lot. These fees are collected at the time a
construction permit is issued.
GENERAL:
• All required utility, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals
prepared according to City of Renton drafting standards by a licensed Civil Engineer.
• All plans shall be tied to a minimum of two of the City of Renton Horizontal and Vertical
Control Network.
• Permit application must include an itemized cost estimate for these improvements. Half of
the fee must be paid upon application for building and construction permits, and the
remainder when the permits are issued. There will be additional fees for water service
related expenses. See Drafting Standards_
0
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY 11111 rocityof
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ------------
Q
M E M Q R A N D U M
DATE: September 9, 2010
TO: Pre -Application File No. 10-033
FROM: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Forest Hills Plat (PRE10-033)
General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre -application for the above -
referenced development proposal_ The following comments on development and permitting
issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant
and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information
contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official
decision -makers (e.g_, Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator,
Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City
Council)_ Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other
design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to
review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are
available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall
or online at www.rentonwa_ ov
Project Proposal: The subject property is located on the east side of Nile Ave NE just north of NE
6th St at the termination of the Pasco PI NE. The project site totals 6.65 acres (289,674 square
feet) in area and is zoned Residential -4 dwelling units per net acre (R-4). The proposal is to
subdivide the vacant parcel into 11 single family lots and two tracts for drainage and a native
growth protection easement. Proposed Lots 1-10 would be accessed via an extension of Pasco
PI NE with an east/west connection that terminates in a hammerhead turnaround. Lot 11 is
proposed to be accessed directly from Nile Ave NE. Category 2 and 3 wetlands have been
identified on the subject property_
Current Use: Vacant.
Zoning: Small lot clusters of up to a maximum of fifty lots are allowed within the R-4 zone, when
at least thirty percent of the site is permanently set aside as "significant open space." Such open
space shall be situated to act as a visual buffer between small lot clusters and other
development in the zone. It appears that more than thirty percent of the site is permanently set
aside as "significant open space". The applicant will need to adequately demonstrate that the
proposed "significant open space" acts as a visual buffer between the small lot cluster and
other development in the zone.
Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-110A, "Development
Standards for Single Family Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application
(noted as "R-4 standards" herein). A copy of these standards is included herewith.
h:\ced�planning\current planning�preapps\10-033.rocale\1"33 (r4 11 -lot cluster wetlands).doc
Forest hills, PRE10-033
Page 2 of 4
September 4, 2010
Type of StandardJ_
Minimum Standard
Proposed
Density
Minimum Density
Minimum Density. none
4.00 du/ac
Maximum Density
Maximum Density 4 du/ac
Lot Standards
Lot Size
8,000 sq ft, except for small lot clusters then
Not Applicable
4,500 sq ft
Lot Width
70 ft for interior lots and 80 ft for corner lots,
Not Applicable
except for small lot clusters then 50 ft for
interior lots and 60 ft for corner lots.
Lot Depth
80 ft, except for small lot clusters then 65 ft.
Not Applicable
Setbacks
Min Front Yard
30 ft, except for small lot clusters then 15 ft.
Not applicable
Unit with Alley Access Garage: The front yard
setback of the primary structure may be
reduced to 20 ft. if all parking is provided in the
rear yard of the lot with access from a public
right-of-way or alley; 10 feet for small lot
clusters.
Side Yard
5 ft
Not applicable
Rear Yard
25 ft, except 20 ft is allowed in small lot clusters.
Not applicable
Side Yard Along -A-
20 ft except 15 ft is allowed in small lot clusters.
Not applicable
Street
Building Standards
Building Coverage
35 % for lots greater than 5,000 sq ft or 2,500 sq
Not applicable
Ratio
ft., whichever is greater. 50% for lots 5,000 sq ft
or less.
Maximum Impervious
55%
Not applicable
Area
Height
30 ft
Not applicable
Landscaping
On -Site Street
10 ft
Unknown
Frontage
*Except for walk and driveways.
Tree Retention
30 % of significant trees
Unknown
Density Requirements —The maximum density for this property would be 4.0 dwelling units per
net acre (du/ac). The area of public and private streets and critical areas would be deducted
from the gross site area to determine the "net" site area prior to calculating density. The
proposal or 11 residential units on the 254,267 square foot (5.837 acre) site arrives at a net
h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\10-033.rocale\10-033 (r411 -lot clusterwetlands).doc
Forest hills, PRE10-033
Page 3 of 4
5epternber 9, 2010
density of 4.0 du/ac (11 lots / 2.751 acre = 3.998 du/ac), with deductions for critical areas and
proposed access. The proposal falls within the permitted density range for the R-4.
Minimum Lot Size, Width and Depth — The proposal appears to comply with the lot size, width
and depth requirements of the zone if the applicant can demonstrate compliance with the
criteria for cluster developments.
Setbacks -- The setbacks for the new residences would be verified at the time of building permit.
Lot Coverage — The proposal's compliance with the lot coverage standards would be verified at
the time of building permit review.
Hem — The proposal's compliance with the height standards would be verified at the time of
building permit review.
Landscaping — Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area which are not
covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped
with native, drought -resistant vegetative cover. The minimum on-site landscape width required
along street frontages is 10 feet. Tree requirements for plats includes at least two (2) trees of a
City approved species with a minimum caliper of 1 % inches per tree must be planted in the
front yard or planting strip of every lot prior to building occupancy. A conceptual landscape
plan must be provided with the formal land use application as prepared by a registered
Landscape Architect, a certified nurseryman or other certified professional. All landscaped
areas must either be comprised of drought resistant vegetation or irrigated.
Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070 and RMC 4-4-080F.7) for further general and
specific landscape requirements (enclosed).
Access/Parking: City street standards prohibit dead end streets that exceed 700 -feet in length.
Secondary emergency access is required as access for the proposed plat exceeds 700 -feet. Staff
would consider a proposal to fill the small Category 3 wetland located on the western portion
of the site, in order to provide secondary access from Nile Ave NE. Mitigation for the filling of
the smaller wetland would be required to include appropriate wetland creation adjacent to
the larger wetland, on the eastern portion of the site, along with enhancement to the existing
wetland and its buffer.
The applicant is required to develop all internal streets to the Limited Residential Standard(RMC
4-6-060), including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving (see enclosed).
Each unit is required to accommodate off street parking for a minimum of two vehicles. Garages
and carports must provide a minimum of 24 ft. of back -out room, either on site or counting
improved alley surface or other improved right-of-way surface. The applicant will be required at
the time of formal land use application to provide detailed parking information.
Significant Tree Retention: If significant trees (greater than 6 -inch caliper) are proposed to be
removed a tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree retention worksheet shall
be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show
preservation of at least 30 percent of significant trees, and indicate how proposed building
footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be
retained. If the trees cannot be retained, they may be replaced with minimum 2 inch caliper
trees at a ratio of six to one.
h;\ced\planning\current plan ning\preapps\10-033_rocale\10-033 (r4 11 -lot cluster wetlands).doc
Forest hills, PPE10-033
Page 4 of 4
September 9, 2010
Critical Areas: The site appears to contain wetlands. A wetland report delineating and
classifying the wetland is required to be submitted with the formal land use application.
Secondary review of the wetland report may be required by one of the individuals listed on the
attached roster at the applicant's expense. All critical areas and buffers are required to be
placed in a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE).
Environmental Review: Environmental (SEPA) Review would be required for the project. SEPA
review is required for projects ten lots/tracts or greater, or on sites that contain critical areas.
Permit Requirements: The project would require Preliminary Plat review and Environmental
(SEPA) Review. With concurrent review of these applications, the process would take an
estimated time frame of 12 weeks. After the required notification period, the Environmental
Review Committee would issue a Threshold Determination for the project. When the required
two-week appeal period is completed, the project would go before the Hearing Examiner. Once
the Hearing Examiner issues a decision a two-week appeal period will commence. The fee for
the Preliminary Plat is $4,000.00 and the fee for Environmental Review is $1,000.00.
The applicant will be required to install a public information sign on the property. Detailed
information regarding the land use application submittal requirements is provided in the
attached handouts. Once Preliminary Plat approval is obtained, the applicant must complete the
required improvements and dedications, as well as satisfy any conditions of the preliminary
approval before submitting for Final Plat review. Once final approval is received, the plat may
be recorded_ The newly created lots may only be sold after the plat has been recorded_
Once the preliminary plat application materials are complete, the applicant is
encouraged to have one copy of the application materials pre-screened at the &"'
floor front counter prior to submitting the complete application package.
Fees - In addition to the fees for review of the fand-use, construction and building permits, the
fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat.
• A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip
attributable to the project;
• A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00 per new single-family lot;
• Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per new single family lot; and
• School Mitigation Fee based on $6,310.00 per new single family lot.
A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review.
Expiration - Upon preliminary approval, the preliminary plat approval is valid for five years with
a possible one-year extension if requested in writing prior to the expiration.
h_\ced\planning current planning\preapps\10-033_rocale\10-033 (r4 11 -lot cluster wetlands).doc
PLANNING DIVISION
WAIVROF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
This requirement may be waived by:
1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME
2. Public Works Plan Review Section
3_ BuildingSection DATE: 1-2-11' f `�
4. Planning Section
Q:IWE B%PW%aEVSERVIForms%Planning%waiverofsubmittalregs.xls
02108
! PLANNING DIVISION
WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIR MENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
This requirement maybe waived by:
1. Property Services Section
2. Public Works Plan Review Section
I Building Section
4. Planning Section
PROJECT NAME:'E`����1
DATE: G
T
QAWEBTWIDEVSERV1FormslPlanninglwaiverofsubmittalregs.xls 02/08
Bill Finkbeiner
From: "Rocale Timmons" <RTimmons@Rentonwa.gov>
Date: Monday, November 01, 2010 9:50 AM
To: "'Bill Finkbeiner"'<billf@finkbeinerdevelopment.com>
Subject: FW: Waivers for PRE10-033
Rocale T.
From: Arneta J. Henninger
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:50 AM
To: Rocale Timmons
Subject: RE: Waivers for PRE10-033
iPage l of 2
Hi, sorry it took me so long_ Yes, I looked it over and I will waive the Geo & the Traffic Study.
Arneta
From: Rocale Timmons
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2010 8:15 AM
To: 'Bill Finkbeiner'
Cc: Darrell Offe; Arneta J. Henninger
Subject: RE: Waivers for PRE10-033
You will just want to bring a blank copy. However, I am not sure all will be waived. Arneta will need to
waive the Geotech Report and Transpo Report. Everything else will be waived.
Rocale T_
From: Bill Finkbeiner [ma iIto:biIIf@finkbeinerdevelopment.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:11 PM
To: Rocale Timmons
Cc: Darrell Offe
Subject: Waivers for PRE10-033
Rocale,
Thank you for taking the time to meet with Darrell Offe, Ed Sewall, and myself last
Weds Oct 20th re the proposed Forrest Hills plat (PRE10-033). I know you are busy so I
appreciate your time and willingness to get such quick answers to our questions.
When we reviewed the submittal requirements checklist we discussed the materials that
could be waived for our plats submittal. I've included that list below to make sure I
have it right.
- Draft legal documents
- Rezone Variance Modification
- Stream or Lake Study
- Flood Hazard Data
- Habitat Data Report
12/20/2010
Pro] ect Narrative for Proposed
Olympus Villa
When developed the proposed plat will create a quality residential
neighborhood consisting of 11 single family lots with approximately 30% of the
site set a side as open space. The project is located in what is now unimproved
vacant land between Nile Ave NE and Pasco Place NE at NE 7th Street. The
property is approximately 293,152 square feet (aprox 6.7 acres) and is zoned R-
4.
The plat is designed to enhance the quality of life of residents by making the
wetlands, open space, and storm detention tracts into amenities that can be
enjoyed by the residents with viewing benches looking over the water quality
pond. We are also proposing to enhance and expand wetlands buffers to
improve their appearance from the road while enhancing the functionality of
the wetland.
The flow of the neighborhood is important to future residents and our
neighbors to the South. There are some space constraints caused by the
existing road connection (Pasco Pl. N.E.) and the Eastern wetland (Tract A).
These constraints restrict this area to be developed in a normal R-4 layout,
therefore we are proposing to utilize the clustering provisions within the code to
provide a diverse make-up of housing in this development. Driving North on
Pasco Place into this development, the houses and frontage will appear to be
similar in size and quality.
To accomplish this our layout shows lots 2-5 fronting the street and using
shared access easements to allow for an `alley load' house plan. This plan gives
a more attractive street view and more pedestrian friendly atmosphere while at
the same time smoothing the transition from the plat and the neighborhood to
the South whose lots are much smaller than the majority of our proposed lots.
Lot 1 meets the width requirements within the R-4 zoning standards (70') but
because of the constraint between the road and the wetland it is slightly less
deep (96') providing for a lot size of 6,700 square feet. It has been included in
the cluster because we believe the shorter depth will allow for full extension of
the wetlands buffer while integrating nicely with the rest of the lots fronting the
access street running West to East. To the future owners the lot will feel large
because most of the back yard will be looking directly into the open space in
Tract A, an open space that covers a large percentage of the plat area.
Currently the site is flat and sparsely wooded with much of the area covered in
shrubs and Himalayan blackberry. Soils are Alderwood gravely sandy loam, a
moderately well drained soil. Due to the wet conditions of the Eastern part of
the property much of the area will be deeded back to the city thus creating an
effective density of 2.6 lots per acre.
The neighborhood would take access both from Nile Ave and from Pasco Place
NE allowing through access both for residents of this plat and from residents of
the neighborhood to the South easier access onto Nile. The portion of the site
fronting Nile Ave NE will be improved.
Currently there are 95 trees on the site that are more than 6" in diameter, of
those 15 are located within critical areas or their buffers and will be retained
and 51 are located in the street or easement rights of way and must be
removed. Of the remaining 29 trees we plan on removing 20 of them and
replacing them with approximately 24 trees of a minimum 2" caliper.
There are currently two wetlands located on the site. The smaller wetland is a
Category III wetland (wetland B) is located inconveniently and blocks both the
access road required by the City and also blocks the only logical point on the
property that could be used for a stormwater facility. Because of these
constraints and because the wetland meets the definition of `significantly
disturbed' we are proposing to replace it with the stormwater facility and
enhance and expand the much larger wetland to the East (wetland A).
Specifically we are proposing to create 6,300 sq.ft. of new Category I1 wetland
on the SouthWest side of the wetland A and to enhance the buffers around
wetland A. Expanding and enhancing the larger wetland will ultimately exceed
the value of wetland B for several reasons, first it replaces 150% of the wetland
that is removed, second it replaces a Category III wetland with a higher quality
Category II, and thirdly it expands a larger more valuable wetland than the
smaller wetland in tract B. This enhancement will have long term benefits on
surrounding areas as we remove a significant amount of invasive blackberry
and replace them with native trees and shrubs thus decreasing the risk of the
invasive species spreading to adjacent parcels.
Cost of construction and future value of the lots created are impossible to
determine because of fluctuations in the market, but given the large lot sizes
and our dedication to quality development the neighborhood will be a net asset
to the local area and serve to increase the market value of nearby homes.
DENSITY r
WORKSHEET
City of Denton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
1. Gross area of property:
1. s9I 3 , /5_a square feet
2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations.
These include:
Public streets"
Private access easements*"
Critical Areas*
Total excluded area:
3. Subtract line 2 from line T for net area
4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage:
5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned:
6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density:
1191 square feet
10 10 square feet
_ G q& 3J square feet
2. 10I, -4-6 6 square feet
3. ! 6 square feet
4. acres
5. % units/lots
6. = dwelling units/acre
*Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for
development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations
including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways,"
Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded.
** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded.
R:IPWIDEVSERV1Forms\Planningldensity.doc Last updated: 11/OW2004 1
Construction Mitigation Description for Olympus Villa Plat
The current market is chaotic and so setting an exact timeline for construction of the plat is difficult,
although it is our hope to begin construction late spring or early summer of 2011 and be completed by
fall of 2011.
Applicant is currently in contract discussions with a construction company that has a record of working
with neighborhoods and communities to reduce impact of their construction work. They will comply
with all city codes and ordinances and will take measures to ensure there is a minimum impact on the
local community.
The location of the proposed road provides a buffer between most of the existing homes in the
neighborhood and the location of the majority of the work. Hauling routes will most likely exit access
directly onto Nile Ave NE. Mitigation measures will be used to ensure that a minimal amount of mud
will be tracked onto any connecting roads.
Construction workers will follow city ordinances to keep noise to a minimum and unless an extreme
circumstance arises we have every reason to expect that the crews will work within the standard Sam to
5pm work hours Monday through Friday.
Traffic control may be necessary during utility construction in and along Nile Ave NE. During that time
flaggers and traffic control materials will be used to ensure safety of drivers and construction workers.
Traffic mitigation will be up to city traffic standards and when feasible will be used outside of busy
transportation hours both to maximize safety for drivers and construction workers and to minimize time
delay impacts on drivers.
0
OLYMPUS VILLA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
L-A
The State Environmental Act (SEPA), chapter 43.210
RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of
a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS)
must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on
the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide
information to help you and the agency identifies impacts from your proposal (and
to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the
agency decide whether an EIS is required.
A. Background
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Olympus Villa
2. Name of applicant: Bill Finkbeiner
3. Address and phone number of applicants and contact person:
Applicant:
Bill Fink6einer
12011 Bel -Red Road
Suite 206
Bellevue, Washington 98005
4. Date checklist prepared: December 4, 2010
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton
Contact:
Bill Finkbeiner
425-434-7777 (office)
6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable):
Preliminary Appro val — Spring 2011
Construction Drawing Approval - Summer 2011
Construction Start - Summer 2011
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes explain:
Not at this time
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or
will be prepared, directly related to this proposal:
Wetland Assessment prepared by Ed Sewall and Associates as part of the plat
application
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for government approvals of
other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes
Explain:
No
0 0
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your
proposal, if known:
City of Renton approval of platting, engineering plan approval, utility
construction permits, and building permits King County Water District
#90 Developer Extension agreement may be required.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form
to include additional specific information on project description.)
The proposal is to develop an existing 6 acre urban zoned parcel into
11 single-family residential building lots. The lots range from 3,000 to
8, 600 square feet.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to
understand theprecise location of your proposed project, including street
address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would
occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s).
Provide a legal description, site plan. vicinity map and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted
with any permit applications related to this checklist.
he site is locaW in northeast Renton Highlands; east of Nile Avenue
NE and at NE 7"" Place. The site will take access off both Nile Avenue
NE and Pasco Avenue NE. The property is currently an overgrown
pasture /and with sparse trees. The project is within the NW '/a of the
SW % of Sec 11, MN, RSE, W, M.
B. Environmental Elements
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one) Flat, rolling, hilly, portion steep,
slopes, mountainous. other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
5% along the central portion of the property
c. What general types of soil are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify
them and note any prime farmland:
Glacial Till— Alderwood Series Soil
d. Are there surface indications of or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe:
No
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill:
Approximately 800 cu. yds, of material will he removed from the
proposed storm water pond. The proposed roadway will be constructed
using the existing material on site. The pond excess will he placed on
site as buffer mitigation and lot fill. No fill material is anticipated to be
brought onto the site for construction.
2
f, Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally
describe:
Yes, erosion could occur during construction,
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
25%
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,
if any:
Silt fabric fencing, sedimentation traps, and swales will he utilized
during construction.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if
known :
Emissions from construction equipment, dust during construction.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe:
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if
any: Construction equipment will meet current State and Federal emission
requirements; dust control (water) will he provided during construction.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(includingyear-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds and
wetland? If yes describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it chows into:
A Class 2 wetlands exists on the easterly side of the parcel. The
drainage from the wetland flows to the south and into Maplewood Creek
which is a tributary to the Cedar River.
2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans:
Yes Site improvements (road, drainage, utilities, grading, and water
service) will be installed within 206 feet of the wetland. No work is
proposed within the wetland. Buffer mitigation is proposed within the
50 buffer surrounding the wetlands
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface waters or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material:
none
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description , purpose, and approximate quantities if known:
NO.
0 0
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the
site plan:
No
G) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?
If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge:
No.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known:
No.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic
tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial.
containing the following chemicals...: agricultural: etc). Describe the general size
of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to
serve:
N/A
c. Water runoff (including storm water);
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will
this water flow into other waters? If so describe:
Runoff will occur from the future roadways and houses. Storm runoff
from the developed project will be either be dispersed or collected and
discharged into the roadside ditch along Nile Avenue NE.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally explain:
Household spills could enter the storm system.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water
impacts. If any:
Storm water BMP's (Best Management Practice] will he incorporated
into the project to minimize surface and ground water impacts during
and after construction. City of Renton standards for BMP'; will be
incorporated and shown on the utility plan.
4. Plants
a. check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
XXX deciduous tree: cottonwood
)QrX evergreen tree: Douglas fr
_XXX shrubs.' blackberries
grass:
_ADIDIC pa stu re
crop or grain
_XXX wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk
cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
0 0
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
AM vegetation within road rights-of-way will he removed.
Approximately 3g% of the site will be cleared and re graded as part of
thhe house construction.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site:
Na
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
Landscaping will be provided by the developer and homeowners
S. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, sonnbirds, other
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered or endangered species known to near or on
the site:
None known.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain:
No.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife if any:
Wetland and buffer preservation together withi buffer mitigation
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used
for heating, manufacturing, etc.:
Electricity and natural gas will be used to meet the project's energy
needs.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe:
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any:
Homes will be constructed to Washington State energy code
requirements.
5
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as
a result 0> this proposal? If so, describe:
Unknown at this time
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
N/A
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
N/A
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: Traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Trak
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Short term noise associated with construction equipment. Long term
noise associated with ii new single family homes.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts if any:
Construction equipment will meet State and Federal noise regulations
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Surrounding property to north is subdivided into larger parcels with
existing homes; to the south and east are developed lots from earlier
development; to the west across Nile is a newer project being
constructed.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe:
No
c. Describe any structures on the site:
N/A
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
N/A
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site:
R-4 Low Density Residential
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Residential Single Family
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the
site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area?
If so, specify:
Yes, as described earlier in this document.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
,24
j, Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
Proposal conforms to Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing:
.i1 new middle income.
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-income housing:
N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Mitigation Fees.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including antennas:
what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed?
30 -0 foot
Wood, concrete, wood products
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
None.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
Light and glare associated with 11 new homes
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with views.
No
7
0
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None
d. proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
None.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinl ?
Coal ,Feld Party Maplewood Party Heather Downs Parry Gene Coulon Beach and
Party and Renton Recreational Center and Pool
b. Would the proposed project displace and existing recreational uses? If so,
describe:
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreational opportunities
to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Pay City of Renton Park Fee
Developer proposes to create recreational opportunities on site around
the storm water pond and near the wetland bunters on the east side
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe:
None known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site:
None known.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
N/A
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any:
The property abuts Nile Avenue NE to the West and Pasco Place NE to
the South. Internally Pasco Ave NE will be extended to the northerly
boundary and NE 70 Place will extend from Nile A ve to Pasco Place.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
No
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would
the project eliminate?
Two parking spaces per lot plus the garage,
0
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private).
Yes. The extension of Pasco A venue NE and new construction of NE 7th
Place both with curb, gutter, landscaping and sidewalk.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur:
The project would generate 90 average daily trips.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if an
The project will pay Traffic impact fees to the City for the traffic impacts
from this project:
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe:
The project will result in an increased need for all public services.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if
any:
Increased tax base pays for services. Parks, fire, sewer and storm water
mitigation fees will also be paid.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural as water.
refuse service, to%yhone, sanitaryserver, septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
Sewer and Public Access - City of Renton
Power and Natural Gas - Puget Sound Energy
Water -- WD #90
Phone - Qwest
Cable Television - Comcast
Internet Access - Comcast
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I
understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make a decision.
Signature:
Name Printed: 6ttc Gtr V ZCinjf�k _....._.,__-.
Date Submitted: iZl7—ol za
0
0
PLAT NAME RESERVATION CERTIFICATE
TO: BILL FINKBEINER
92019 BEL -RED RD, SUITE 206
BELLEVUE, WA 98005
PLAT RESERVATION EFFECTIVE DATE: October 22, 2010
The plat name, OLYMPUS VILLA has been reserved for future use by GO FEVER LLC.
I certify that I have checked the records of previously issued and reserved plat names. The requested name has not
been previously used in King County nor is it currently reserved by any party_
This reservation will expire October 22, 2019, one year from today_ It may be renewed one year at a time. If the plat
has not been recorded or the reservation renewed by the above date it will be deleted.
T Deputy Agar
King Count
I]
OLYMPUS VILLA
LUA 10-xxx
NE 7th PLACE and NILE AVENUE NE
Renton, Washington
0
PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT
December 9, 2010
Prepared for.
Bill Finkbeiner
12011 Bel -Red Road
Suite 206
Bellevue, Washington 98005
(425) 454-7777 office
Submitted/ Prepared by:
Offe Engineers, PLLC
Attn: Darrell Offe, P.E.
13932 SE 159th Place
Renton, Washington 98058-7832
(425) 260-3412 office
(425) 988-0292 fax
�(0
rj
:"Jon
Project Description
The purpose of this report is to present a preliminary assessment of the site and
downstream drainage system for the proposed 11 -lot preliminary plat of Olympus Villa.
This project is a proposed single family plat located in the Renton Highlands at the
intersection of Nile Avenue NE and (proposed) NE r Place. The project also takes
access off the existing road of Pasco Place NE within the City limits of Renton.
The Olympus Villa project is a proposal to create 11 single family lots from an existing 6
acre parcel zoned R-4. The project is currently consist of over -grown pasture land with
sparse trees. On the east side of the property is a large Class 2 wetland that extends
off the property to the south and east. No work is proposed within the buffers of the
Class 2 wetlands. There are no existing buildings on the property.
The existing King County Tax Parcel number is 112305-9065.
The parcel is bounded to the West by Nile Avenue NE; to the north by large parcels with
single family homes; to the east and south by resent single family developments.
Review of Resources
Critical Drainage Area Map
• Maplewood Creek / Cedar River / Lake Washington Watershed
Flood plain/floodway (FEMA) Maps
• There is no mapped floodplain in the immediate area per the available FEMA
map.
Sensitive Areas
• Wetlands — There are wetlands located on the project; they consist of a Class 2
wetlands to the east side of the property that continues off site to the south and
east, there is a smaller un -regulated wetland on the west side of the property.
See the Sensitive Areas study prepared by Ed Sewall and Assoc. as part of the
preliminary plat submittal package.
• Streams and 100 Year Flood Plains -- There are no streams or floodplains on
or near the project.
• Erosion Hazard Areas — There are no landslide hazard areas on this project.
• Landslide Hazard Areas — There are no designated sensitive slopes on or
adjoining the property.
• Seismic Hazard Areas — The area is not mapped as a seismic hazard area.
• Coal Mine Hazard Areas — The property does not appear to be located within
a designed coalmine hazard area.
-2-
!I !
U.S. Department of Agriculture, King County Soils Survey
• The soils on the site are classified as Alderwood gravelly and loam (Ag8), 5 to
10 percent slopes. These soils types are described in the Soil Survey of King
County Area, Washington (Soil Conservation Service [SCS], 1973). Alderwood
soils are characterized as gravelly sandy loam to a depth of 12 inches and
gravelly, sand loam with organics between 12 and 27 inches. This gravelly, sand
loam structure is underlain by weekly to strongly consolidated till to a depth of
60 inches. Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layers and very slow
in the till layer, runoff is slow to medium, and the potential for erosion is
moderate.
Flow Control / Water Quality design --
The project would be required to meet the 2009 KC Drainage Manual (Modified
by the City of Renton) for design and sizing.
Field Inspection
Offe Engineers has visited the site on several occasions during the summer and fall of
2010. The most resent visit occurred the morning of December 7, 2010. The weather
conditions were dry, warm, and clear.
The ground slopes from the upper portion of the property to the west and into
the ditch along Nile Avenue NE. The drainage along Nile Ave. NE slopes from centerline
to the existing roadside open ditch on the easterly side. The open ditch continues to
flow to the south from the site to the intersection of NE 4t' Street (appox. 2600 feet
downstream). The ditch has several cross culverts for access use into property. Near
NE 6"' St. the ditch is enclosed within conveyance pipes for about 150 feet then
continues within the open ditch. During the several site visits, there is no indication of
overtopping or capacity problems within the open ditch (culvert) system. Photos of the
system can be found in this report under Appendix A, figure 4.
Review of the S Core Requirements and S Special Requirements of the 2009
King County Surface Water Design Manual
Offe Engineers has reviewed the Core and Special Requirements in Chapter 1 of the
King County Surface Water Design Manual, and addresses each of the requirements as
follows
Care Requirement No. 1-- Dis iarge at Natural Location
The current property has two points of discharge; easterly side — the easterly wetlands
flows to the southeast corner (this drainage break is approximately along the easterly
side of the proposed extension of Pasco Place NE), westerly side — the balance of the
property sheet flows to the west and into the drainage ditch along Nile avenue NE. The
easterly side - no proposed development is to occur except lot 1 which will utilize full
dispersion of runoff continuing into the existing wetlands and flowing to the southeast;
the westerly side — this flow will be collected into a wet pond and discharged into the
existing roadside ditch along Nile Avenue NE.
-3-
Core Requirement. 2 — Oftite Analysis 0
There are no upstream basins that contribute to the site. Nile Avenue NE has a ridge
line (high point) just to the north of the property where the drainage flows north. This
property appears to be the northerly extents of the basin on Nile that flows south.
The wetland to the east is proposed to be left un -disturbed with no changes occurring in
this basin.
Corse Requirement No. 3 — flow Control
The proposed project will be required to provide detention for the impervious areas.
A storm water facility is proposed on the westerly side to collect and discharge flows per
the 2009 Manual. All the proposed roadways onsite (NE 7th and Pasco Ave NE) will be
collected and conveyed to the storm water facility. Lot 1 on the east will utilize full
dispersion with a 100 foot flow path for flow control within the easterly basin.
Core Requirement No. 4 — Conveyance System
The proposed on-site conveyance improvements will include curb, catch basins and a
pipe network for collection of surface runoff from landscape, driveways, roadways, and
sidewalks. Roof downspouts will be connected via tight line to the conveyance system.
Come Requiremwat No. 5 — Erosion and Sediment ConhW
A Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan implementing the Best Management
Practices will be designed as part of the final engineering plans for the project in
accordance with City of Renton requirements.
Core Requirement No. 6 — Maintenance and Operations
The Maintenance and Operations Manual for the Olympus Villa Subdivision will be
included in the Final Storm Drainage Report as part of the final engineering design for
the project.
Core Requirement No: 7 — Financial Guaranftes and Liability
The Financial Guarantees and Liabilities will be required prior to the project being
finalized by the City of Renton.
Core Requirement No. S — Water Qualify
The project will provide the required water quality facility as part of the final engineering
design per the 2009 Manual. The site is located in the basic water quality treatment
area.
Special Requirement No. 1— Adopfred Area Spey Uk Requirements
There is no special overlay or requirements within the City of Renton that affect this
property.
Special Requirement No. 2 — Floodplain/Floodway Delineation
This requirement does not apply.
.Special Requirement No. 3 — Flood Protection Fadlibes
This requirement does not apply.
Special Requirement No. 4 — Soourae Controls
This requirement does not apply because the project is located in the basic water quality
treatment area.
Special Requirement No 5 — Oil Control
This requirement does not apply.
-4-
AppendPA AFigures
�
1. Proposed Site Plan
2. Drainage System Table/Map
3. Photo Key Map
4. Photos
WC
w
U]
LU
LO
co
N
u1
U)
cfl
111
E7NW - 11T23N R05E NW 114
1
—common no
�
r h 530, l
` � h
N-us� k
- -
j - 1654 J~� o� - -
f ,' -- 16523 r'
1.4 1 18555 r.�� 52a
,B54a 21YE 7th Ct- 1 -
18581'- _1653.1
C_ ,BSI,
1017 16519
185291 18664 -
I,. ,8534 iBSeS_ - g }
1052
18531
+ 16519 _1 18524
-�_ 2287 71872
St
i
so _ ,8581
S
N
_ 530 k
152V `pro / _ 1 .16828
,!4 j ,l t
87 22876 f -rte.. I - j Y : -�4 \•'� �, -
l I `J�415527
,, •,,` ` /� r 77 9 6 22857_. a� 18511
, 75 P1194
520
11112" 111o
a84e .I I. ...178 —_ 23054 72639 ,thy 1185BS !r 0
1 11 1 t r
- — E 61h St 22aea Z9556 P,B B3 85
—� �"_ _ ,8508-J 23 '_ ��
5y u _
?2u4 22866 :� 2288,_ ' 1 22841 ,8596 - -lel 71 18572 +Blas + L,i SE 124th St -�--'_ - - .
IN 1es,e I&M — SET 4th St
y 1
18587 1 I B 16581
1 jla S
,a5,7
,u'
X —U zzns 22 uea4 C 22942
.71643 -
tapes
�---
221
I 1-- .225R 22afi522 215 76 18538-
} r �!
r/sj�jt�: �22B88 2�B1fki
1e4BB
V 220M law
i 22893 12807 22847 L--'�-
10 22B46
1 95 18531 `
- �
' --r!
1122888
,. f, ` i,`� - ` 97 22848 3 185
.227 18498
B ` r
248 �; 925, � ..:•.'� -, 1 ` J r - � ` � I .J - .
111 _�_..
` 22 18542 - !
i
1 17898 -h: /� l ?2882 1E
4th P1' 18138-18H7 1
7 7 - �rt9139-416722 za �''� 4_ 22'51 2265, -- �s��._
(� 853 IYE 4th Pl 16'41_— ie60i
471---- 18 - 2208 - ~�71A03 1856 78
f 904 i.` --. l
17805 _ 18_127
I89A7 -�1 <1` AI 41880541145~,..} 4 18582 8fi83� l-�,\ } - i 'p
141
P1B1 18729�� _ 16553 r&s3yr -,- �--
i !
..45---- .� --- _ ,�.,_._.J 111 g38
'.- _ - __- 16557 / ..
142E912 - 2291p 18.558 8831 \ J
--
--- - _ --Q._.. Ll-�1-4
_'i 1088
r1YB40v�'E•���th-St•_.-�- 785 '2--
,,n
IN 5S0
1631�1
_ o \ J
17984 �• 1� ,-i 2132 .L_ 21233 4235,��
�17B�W 178-���--- � - - 17992 ''. 4231 I9234'�
17587
4 nsee I17987 r 1 Cedar River to Lake Sammaish,Trail Site
_ l J 21237 b+ ` I
IM 175 11690'1��.. '+ 1 P17511-- IB000� •24296,4-_"'1
l a
Structures
Conveyance
Flow Control Facility
Renton
Renton
Renton
o Inlet
— Pipe
® Pond
a Type 1
— Culvert
Tank
0 Type 2
Private
Vault
0 Vault
— Pipe
Private ('P' Prefix)
® Pump Station
Culvert
E Pond
Private ('P' Prefix)
King County
IQ Tank
■ Inlet
— Pipe
® Vault
■ Type 1
— Culvert
King County
+ Type 2
WSDOT
Pond
■ Vault
— Pipe
Tank
King County
— Culvert
Miscellaneous
■ Inlet
Other
�
=rn�r—rJ Renton Limits
Type 7
— Channel
PAA
O Type 2
Ditch
— ; Quarter Section
WSDOT
Flow
Park/Open Space
rI Type 1
Flow Control
-- 1Oft Contour
0 Type 2
— Infiltration
1
— 6ioswale
—
F7NW - 14T 23N R05E NW 114
A3
AO AT
A8
' 25 5330
98`
..- O -.
5425
R2 83
66
88
95
4
5433
5434
2135
5436
C -*'
C6
C7
CS
90
05
5
5, 03
5p2
5301
�6
C8
312 T
09
5310.
11
f~
E2
E
E5
�6
E8
3
`2
F
5316
F5
1
5 f3' -�
—
F8
5320
5321
323
5534
3
G5
! - " 3
12 H
5329
Fj4
5328
H5
5 7
6
1
I H7
C ¢�
12 3 J5
212 T 5208 520'
Disclaimer:
This inventory information is schematic only. It was
compiled from numerous sources. It Is the best
Information available at this time and should be
used for general guidance only. The City of Renton
Is not responsible for errors or omissions. When this
information is used for planning, design, and/or
construction purposes, users are to field verify this
information.
City of
Surface Water Utility
Asset Inventory
May 2009
0 150 300 600
Feet
117 23N R05E SW 1/4
5311 E7SW
FIGURE 1
Proposed Site Plan
w
m
j.
i
aFam-
s OLYMPUS VILLA �OFFEENGINEERS
0
o� BILL FINKBEINER e� _
�cer�im g• �F�u. or rtcumer
DRAINAGE CONTROL PLAN tto
FIGURE 2
Drainage System Table /Map
WIM
r
LJ
ME
CO'
.wi
C4
M
O
v
d
U)
fli d L
°oo
Q
U)
El C
= L L
r a
L" CL
y Cl]
rj
_O
= m
+s
++ Q
Mss
v
ov
L)
04
->'
o
o
0 a
o
o
00 L-
v v
Cm)o
.` >
�0
N E
c c o
v
"o
p
ao o
o mt
G
s
a
"V- c o
C
C
c
fltu
o
a
o
O
z
z
z
z
�►mE2
-0-9 j C
U)
c E
C
N
EL m
ami
2 m
X a
inoa,-0
a'co
o �m
LU
"'
Z El z
z
z�°yam
w
o
L�
C
00 p�
O
d 0
=0
Ii
I
�+
00
E
O
v Ot
..c.. �'
N
❑
\
�
V)
v]
cn
U]
d
a
'
Vl
m
�r
o
o2t
avi
Ln
0 QOIC
a
L y s rn
y p O
U
1
N
U
a O
f..'
�t
U❑
O
m
Ll U �.
�h a'"i
v
v¢> v
d 3
y
v
«.
y a o W
O
d? v N
O v OCL
�,
Z
d 0
°7 di
LX
ma)
41F -•N
C�
oc`°-o`°
a
o
_Cc
�t
3
�'
O
Nw
_o
L
❑ O. Eon
rob
v
O.
E
n o
ozp
a
O
a
E
y
L'
FIGURE 3
Photo Key Map
0
.I
-_..
PRAIJV
16
53p
48
1
580
18
2287 22872 f
sit S
5 ��p
52v~�f
k � 22875 iM
I j
:-j.,
W 3 1 181
b0 j 2287$. I j = �r
C)
f ;,
i 4Ql 2Z839
tY t494e 1094?SE . 24th St �' E 6th St 22e5o 2
N
O lT
J �•a _ ,.f nen
Y
v♦ !," Ips -c:s P 2; ' -=:i
`1 � •�� .� I� i Y !. , 3 � lig I: --1 �r ! t _i'� .�y
Im,
I � 1 � o-, � .. � .� � ti 185:
22893 22888 \" 22907 22847—'
22846
1389 - �i1 ' S
JVV�� 8544
..�•� 1 485.
at :!1 L1B5
22897
22849--'.j
49.
1 17898 4th Pl' -ie136 iBi 181—l�1BT2z i nB52 2ZB51 ` Base
7NE 4th PI 1az41-
i{. V/ 943 s pj r o
P17 ` .. r 18 72903 r
P) o -
7�8.63 P11 �� ` 153 P18805P9195
' ,; P17901 , P388
141 17948 .18140 18720 _�� i ?2813
e III A; P18143_ » .,.. _
Ej
FIGURE 4
Photos
0
-M -
T4. VA 9
Photo 3
Downstream roadside ditch with driveway culverts
Photo 4
Downstream roadside ditch with driveway culverts
Photo 5
Intersection of NE 6th street and Nile Ave NE
Photo 6
Downstream of intersection
0
Photo 7
Pasco Ave NE viewing North and second entry
0 0
Appendix B
Technical Information Worksheet
-6-
0
City of Renton
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND
PROJECT ENGINEER
Project Owner: Bill Finkbeiner
Address: 12011 Bel -Red Road
Suite #206
Bellevue, WA 98005
Phone: (425) 454-7777
Project Engineer: Darrell Offe, P.E.
Company: Offe Engineers, PLLC
Address/Phone: 13932 SE 159th Platte
Renton, WA 98058
(425) 260-3412
Part 3 TYPE OF PERMIT
APPLICATION
X
Subdivision
❑
Short Subdivision
❑
Grading
LJ
Commercial
❑
Other
Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND
DESCRIPTION
Project Name: Olympus Villa
Location
Township: 23 North
Range: 5 East
Section: 11
Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS
❑
DFW HPA
❑
COE 404
❑
DOE Dam Safety
❑
FEMA Floodplain
❑
COE Wetlands
Part 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN
Community
North Renton
Drainage Basin
Maplewood Creek / Cedar River / Lake Washington
Part 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS
❑ River
❑
Stream
❑
Critical Stream Reach
❑
Depressions/Swales
❑
Lake
❑
Steep Slopes
❑ Shoreline Management
Rockery
❑ Structural Vaults
❑ Other
❑
Floodplain
X
Wetlands Class 2
❑
Seeps/Springs
❑
High Groundwater Table
❑
Groundwater Recharge
❑
Other
Part 7 SOILS
Soil Type
AgB
0
0
Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velcoties
5--10%
❑ Additional Sheets Attached
Part S DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS
REFERENCE
❑ Ch. 4 — Downstream Analysis
11
❑
Ll
❑ Additional Sheets Attached
Passible
LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT
Part 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
DURING CONSTRUCTION
AFTER CONSTRUCTION
❑
Sedimentation Facilities
❑
Stabilize Exposed Surface
❑
Stabilized Construction Entrance
❑
Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities
❑
Perimeter Runoff Control
❑
Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris
❑
Clearing and Grading Restrictions
❑
Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities
❑
Cover Practices
❑
Flag Limits of SAO and open space
❑
Construction Sequence
preservation areas
❑
Other
❑
Other
Part 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM
❑
Grass Lined
❑
Tank
❑
Channel
❑
Vault
❑
Pipe System
❑
Energy Dissapator
❑
Open Channel
❑
Compensation/Mitigati
❑
Wetland
❑
Dry Pond
❑
Stream
X Wet Pond
❑
Infiltration
Method of Analysis
Retaining Wall
❑
2009 KC Manual
❑
Depression
Other
KCRTS
❑
Flow Dispersal
❑
Compensation/Mitigati
Waiver
on of Eliminated Site
❑
Regional
Storage
Detention
Brief Description of System Operation: Catch basins within curb line of street, conveyance
to wet pond on westerly side of property The discharge will into the existing roadside
ditch along Nile Avenue NE
Facility Related Site Limitations
Reference Facility Limitation
Part i 1 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
❑
Cast in Place Vault
Retaining Wall
❑
Rockery ? 4' High
❑
Structural on Steep Slope
Other
Part 12 EASEMENTSlTRACTS
❑ Drainage Easement
❑ Access Easement
X Native Growth Protection Easement
X Tract
❑ Other
Part 13 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site
conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of
my knowledge the information provided here is accurate.
Signed/Date
i
commonwealth
LAND TITLE COMPANY OF PUGET SOUND, LLC
Northpoint Escrow and Title
Norma Brown
570 Kirkland Way Ste 100
Kirkland, WA 98033
14450 N,E, 29th PI., #200
r Bellevue, WA 98007
Phone: 688-267-2301
Fax: 425-646-3513
SUPPLEMENTAL NO, 4 OF 2ND
TITLE COMMITMENT NO. NWR3 - 40052244
Re: File No.: NWR3 - 40052244 - TO
Title Officer: Nathan Warwick
Reference:
Buyer/Borrower(s): William Finkbeiner
Seller(s): Robert Anderson
Subject Property: NA, Renton, WA
Special Exceptions No. 8 & 12 have been eliminated.
The vesting has been amended to read as follows:
Robert Lynn Anderson and Gale Lee Anderson, aka Gale Lee Miner, As Tenants in Common, DBA Genesis
Grounds Maintenance
EXCEPT as to the matters reported herein above, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT
been re-examined.
Dated: December 6, 2010
RGJ
Supplemental Page 1 of 1
E
Commonwealth Land Title Co of Puget Sound, LLC
14450 Northeast 29th Place
Suite 200
Bellevue, WA 98007
14450 N.E. 29"' PL, #200
Bellevue, WA 98007
Phone: 888-267-2301
Fax: 42S-646-3513
SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 3 TO SECOND
TITLE COMMITMENT NO. NWRJ - 40052244
Re: File No.:
Title Officer:
Reference:
Buyer/Borrower(s)
Seller(s):
Subject Property:
NWRJ - 40052244 - TO
Nathan Warwick
William Finkbeiner
Robert Anderson
NA, Renton, WA
Special Exception No. 9 has been eliminated.
EXCEPT as to the matters reported herein above, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT
been re-examined.
Dated: December 3, 2010
NWW
Supplemental Page 1 of 1
commonwealth.
LAND TITLE COMPANY OF PUGET SOUND, LLC
Northpoint Escrow and Title
Norma Brown
570 Kirkland Way Ste 100
Kirkland, WA 98033
0
14450 N.E. 29th PI., #200
Bellevue, WA 98007
Phone: 888-267-2301
Fax: 425-646-3513
SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 2 OF 2ND
TITLE COMMITMENT NO. NWR] - 40052244
Re: File No.:
Title Officer:
Reference:
Buyer/Borrower(s)
Seller(s):
Subject Property:
N W R3 - 4005 2244 - TO
Nathan Warwick
William Finkbeiner
Robert Anderson
NA, Renton, WA
The following Special Exception has been added:
12. PENDING ACTION IN King COUNTY:
SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO.: 10-2-33758-0
BEING AN ACTION TO: Quite title
PLAINTIFF: Robert Lynn Anderson and Gale Lee Anderson
DEFENDANT: Melvin lack Rothrock and Pei Tzu Rothrock and Retta L
Beauchamp
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF: James D McBride (425) 885 4066
Lis Pendens thereof recorded on September 27, 2010 as Recording No. 20100927000020.
EXCEPT as to the matters reported herein above, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT
been re-examined.
Dated: September 30, 2010
RG3
Supplemental Page 1 of 1
0
LAND TI'TL'E: COiMPANY OF PUGE"L SOUND, LLC
0
Order No.; NWR3 - 40052244
SECOND
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE A
14450 N.E. 29t' Pl., X200
Bellevue, WA 98007
Phone. 888-257-2301
Fax. 425-646-3513
1. Effective Date: August 5, 2010 at 8:00 a.m. Commitment No.: NWR3 - 40052244
2. Policy or Policies to be issued:
ALTA 2003 Homeowner's Policy General Schedule Rate
Proposed Insured: William Finkbeiner
Amount: $200,000.00
Premium: $ 689.00 Agent Portion of $620.10
Premium:
Tax: $ 65.46 Underwriter $68.90
Portion of
Premium
Total, $ 754.46
ALTA 2006 Loan Policy - Simultaneous Issue
Proposed Insured: To Be Determined
Amount: TO COME
Premium: $ 0.00 Agent Portion of $0.00
Premium:
Tax: $ 0.00 Underwriter $0.00
Portion of
Premium:
Total: $ 0.00
3. Title to the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this
Commitment is at the effective elate hereof vested in:
Retta L. Beauchamp, as her separate estate
4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows;
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
Preliminary Commitment Page 1
0 0
Order No. NWR3 - 40052244
EXHIBIT „A„
THE PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 330 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING,
THENCE EAST 1320 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION;
THENCE SOUTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 315 FEET;
THENCE WEST 645 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 157.5 FEET;
THENCE WEST 675 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION;
THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 157.5 FEETTO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD
AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 103.00 FEET OF THE WEST 95.00 FEET.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
0
SCHEDULE B
i
Order No. NWR7 - 40052244
REQUIREMENTS- Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be properly executed,
delivered and duly filed for record.
EXCEPTIONS: Schedule B of the. Policy or Policies to be Issued will contain exceptions to the
following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company.
A. Standard exceptions set forth on the Commitment Cover,
B. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing
in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date
the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon
covered by this Commitment.
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS:
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF RCW CHAPTER 82.45 AND
SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS THERETO.
AS OF THE DATE HEREIN, THE TAX RATE FOR SAID PROPERTY IS 1.78%.
FOR ALL TRANSACTIONS RECORDED ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2005:
• A FEE OF $10.04 WILL BE CHARGED ON ALL EXEMPT TRANSACTIONS;
• A FEE OF $5.00 WILL BE CHARGED ON ALL TAXABLE TRANSACTIONS IN ADDITION TO
THE EXCISE TAX DUE;
GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES AND SERVICE CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH
INTEREST", PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY:
(IST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1)
TAX ACCOUNT NO_: 112305 9065
YEAR BILLED PAID BALANCE
2010 $7,981.55 $0.00 $7,981.55
2009 $8,335.59 $0.00 $8,335,59
2008 $7,816.17 $3,908.09 $3,908,08
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, NOT INCLUDING INTEREST AND PENALTY: $20,225.22.
LEVY CODE: 6855
ASSESSED VALUE LAND: $680,000,00
ASSESSED VALUE IMPROVEMENTS: $0.00
3. FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, RESULTING FROM POSSIBLE TAX FORECLOSURE
PROCEEDINGS. CONTACT TH E KING COUNTY COMPTROLLER`S OFFICE TO DETERMINE
WHETHER THERE ARE ANY FORECLOSURE COSTS, WHICH ARE IN ADDITION TO INTEREST
AND PENALTIES THAT MAY BE DUE. COMPTROLLER'S PHONE NO.; 206-296-4184,
Page 3
0 9
Order- No. NWR] - 40052244
SCHEDULE B — continued
4. RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
RECORDED 110890, UNDER RECORDING NO. 66514, AS FOLLOWS:
RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIONS THEREOF AS
ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE USE AND THE
RIGHT AND TITLE TO THE USE OF SUCH SURFACE GROUND AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR
MINING OPERATIONS, AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUCH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED
MINERAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME.
S_ DECLARATION OF COVENANT IMPOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED ON MARCH 19, 1981,
UNDER RECORDING NO. 8103190403.
6. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY:
RECORDED: AUGUST 07, 1995
RECORDING NO.: 9508079012
7, TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4612 IMPOSED BY
INSTRUMENT RECORDED ON JUNE 21, 1996, UNDER RECORDING NO. 9606210966.
8_ REAL ESTATE CONTRACT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
SELLER: RETTA L. BEAUCHAMP, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE
PURCHASER: MELVIN J. ROTHROCK, JR. AND PEI TZU ROTHROCK, HUSBAND
AND WIFE
RECORDED: JANUARY 23, 1975
RECORDING NO.: 7501230048
EXCISE RECEIPT NO.: E283717
PURCHASER'S INTEREST IS NOW HELD BY ROBERT ANDERSON AND GALE ANDERSON,
PRESUMPTIVELY SUBJECT TO THE COMMUNITY INTEREST OF THEIR RESPECTIVE SPOUSES IF
MARRIED SINCE OCTOBER 06, 2000, DATE OF ACQUIRING THEIR INTEREST.
PURSUANT TO RECORDING NOS.: 8804181153, 20400705000252, 20000928000371
AND 20001006000842
MATTERS OF RECORD AGAINST THE CONTRACT PURCHASER, OR PERSONS WITH SIMILAR
NAMES.
THE CONTRACT PURCHASER IS ROBERT ANDERSON. NUMEROUS MATTERS OF RECORD ARE
FOUND AGAINST PERSONS WITH SIMILAR NAMES. THE EFFECTS OF THESE MATTERS, IF
ANY, ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CANNOT BE DETERMINED WITHOUT FURTHER
INFORMATION.
TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTS OF THESE MATTERS, IF ANY, ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE
VESTED PARTY MUST PROVIDE THE COMPANY WITH A PROPERLY COMPLETED IDENTITY
AFFIDAVIT PRIOR TO THE DATE OF RECORDING.
AFTER THE COMPANY EXAMINES THE AFFIDAVIT, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.
Page 4
0 0
Order No. NWR3 - 40052244
SCHEDULE B — continued
10. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY; RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND HOLDERS OF SECURITY
INTERESTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY INSTALLED UPON THE LAND; AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS
TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM.
11. OUR INSPECTION MADE ON APRIL 2, 2010, DISCLOSED THE FOLLOWING:
THE LAND IS UNIMPROVED. PROVIDED NO CONSTRUCTION AS BEGUN PRIOR TO CLOSING
ALTA MATTERS WILL BE CLEAR FOR THE LOAN POLICY, IF ANY, TO ISSUE.
NOTE 1: IN THE PAST 24 MONTHS, THERE HAVE BEEN NO CONVEYANCES OF RECORD FOR THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A HEREIN. TITLE WAS ACQUIRED BY RETTA L.
BEAUCHAMP, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO.
6256362,
NOTE 2: THE COMPANY HAS BEEN ASKED TO ISSUE A LENDER'S POLICY WITHOUT DISCLOSURE
OF THE LIABILITY AMOUNT. THIS COMMITMENT SHALL BE EFFECTIVE ONLY WHEN THE
AMOUNT OF THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR HAS BEEN INSERTED IN SCHEDULE A HEREOF.
THE COMPANY MAY HAVE FURTHER REQUIREMENTS IF THE UNDISCLOSED AMOUNT TO
BE INSURED EXCEEDS THE CURRENT ASSESSED VALUATION.
NOTE 3: ACCORDING TO THE APPLICATION FOR TITLE INSURANCE, THE PROPOSED INSURED IS
WILLIAM FINKBEINER, WHO WILL ACQUIRE TITLE PRESUMPTIVELY SUBJECT TO THE
COMMUNITY INTEREST OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, IF MARRIED. WE FIND NO PERTINENT
MATTERS OF RECORD AGAINST THE NAME OF SAID PARTY; HOWEVER, THE COMPANY
HAS BEEN UNABLE TO SEARCH FOR AND DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST MATTERS, IF ANY,
RELATING TO THE SPOUSE, WHICH MATTERS MAY ENCUMBER THE TITLE TO THE
PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED.
NOTE 4: BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY, ON THE DATE OF THIS
COMMITMENT IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS LOCATED ON THE LAND:
VACANT LAND
LOCATED IN:
ISSAQUAH, WA
NOTE 5: IF YOU WOULD LIKE THE COMPANY TO ACT AS TRUSTEE IN THE PROPOSED DEED OF
TRUST, PLEASE NOTE THAT "COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE COMPANY OF PUGEf
SOUND, LLC" MAY ACT AS TRUSTEE OF A DEED OF TRUST UNDER RCW 61.24.010(1),
Page 5
9 0
Order No. NWR3 - 40052244
SCHEDULE 8 - continued
NOTE 6: THE COMPANY REQUIRES THE PROPOSED INSURED TO VERIFY THAT THE LAND COVERED
BY THIS COMMITMENT IS THE LAND INTENDED TO BE CONVEYED IN THIS TRANSACTION.
THE DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND MAY BE INCORRECT, IF THE APPLICATION FOR TITLE
INSURANCE CONTAINED INCOMPLETE OR INACCURATE INFORMATION. NOTIFY THE
COMPANY WELL BEFORE CLOSING IF CHANGES ARE NECESSARY. CLOSING
INSTRUCTIONS MUST INDICATE THAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN REVIEWED
AND APPROVED BY ALL PARTIES.
NOTE 7: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE
DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED, PER AMENDED RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL
DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE
BODY OF THE DOCUMENT.
PTN NW1/4 SWI/5 STR 11 -23 -USE TAX LOT 9065
NOTE S. WHEN SENDING DOCUMENTS FOR RECORDING, VIA U.S. MAIL OR SPECIAL COURIER
SERVICE, PLEASE SEND TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS, UNLESS SPECIFIC
ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE WITH YOUR TITLE UNIT:
COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE COMPANY OF PUGET SOUND
1501 - 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 340
SEATTLE, WA 98101
ATTN: RECORDING DEPT.
COMMONWEALTH PRE -ADDRESSED ENVELOPES MAY STILL BE USED WHEN SENDING
DOCUMENTS VIA TDS (TITLE DELIVERY SERVICE) TO THE ADDRESS ON THE FACE OF THE
COMMITMENT COVER PAGE OR TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
NOTE 9: IN THE EVENT THAT THE COMMITMENT JACKET IS NOT ATTACHED HERETO, ALL OF THE
TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN SAID ]ACKET ARE
INCORPORATED HEREIN, THE COMMITMENT JACKET IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT
ANY COMPANY OFFICE.
NOTE 10: THE POLICY(S) OF INSURANCE MAY CONTAIN A CLAUSE PERMITTING ARBITRATION OF
CLAIMS AT THE REQUEST OF EITHER THE INSURED OR THE COMPANY, UPON REQUEST,
THE COMPANY WILL PROVIDE A COPY OF THIS CLAUSE AND THE ACCOMPANYING
ARBITRATION RULES PRIOR TO THE CLOSING OF THE. TRANSACTION.
Page 6
Order No. NWR] - 40052244
SCHEDULE B — continued
(END OF EXCEPTIONS)
Investigation should be made to determine if there are any sewer treatment capacity charges or if
there are any service, installation, maintenance, or construction charges for sewer, water or
electricity.
In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in
accordance with our rate schedule.
Unless otherwise requested or specified herein, the Forms of policy to be issued in connection with this
Commitment will be the ALTA 2003 Homeowner's Policy, the ALTA 2006 Loan Policy, or, in the case of
standard lenders coverage, the ALTA 2006 Standard Loan Policy.
The Policy committed for or requested may be examined by inquiry at the office that issued the
Commitment. A specimen copy of the Policy form(s) referred to in this Commitment will be furnished
promptly upon request.
BSK/SM3
Enclosures:
Sketch
Vesting Deed
Paragraphs: All recorded documents
Page 7
10 9
ll�lm
ro Commonwealth'
LAND TITLE INSURANCE C04PANY
Comurunwe;dth Land'I'itle Insurarrce Com AM Comm l'I'AII. i, FOR TI'I'I.F, IN-AIRANCF
Commonwealth Laud Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby
commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or
mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges
therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the
conditions and stipulations of the policy or polities requested. (See the fallowing pages for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule R exceptions
contained in various policy forms.)
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been
Inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement and is subject to
the Conditions and Stipulations.
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and
terminate 100 days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the
failure to issue such policy or policies is not tate fault of the Company.
NOTE: THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT, AND A
SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON
REQUEST.
COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPAMY
�� . -•..., ���k 3( it 4.1 [j�r T��
COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall Include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument.
Z. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or
interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule 6 hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge
to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance heraon to the
extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the
Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the
Company at Its option may amend Schedule 9 of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability
previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations.
3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of
Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to
comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or
mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies
committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form
of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this
Commitment except as expressly modified herein
-
d. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the
title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the
provisions of this Commitment.
5, The policy to be issued contains are arbitration clause. Ali arbitrable matters svhar, the Amount of insurance: is 52.000.000 or Jess shall be
arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration mias
at< htrn:hWv;w.alta.ortth.
Commitment Cover- WA (Revised 8-07)
0 0
SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs,
attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting,
regulating, prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or locations of any improvement erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5,
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk
6.
Z. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or B.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Pal€Cyr but Known to the Insured Claimant and
not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an
Insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under
Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured
Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable
doing -business laws of the state where the Land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability €n whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction
evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and Is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth -int -lending law.
5. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the
transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy.
7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching
between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Ri;k 11(b).
C'{+minitu1ent C'k,%cr - ',i .� i V_N ixed N-1!71
SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS ]FROM COVERAGE (continued)
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs,
attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting,
regulating, prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk
6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and
not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an
Insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under
Covered Risk 9 and 10); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title,
4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the
transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(b) a preferential transfar for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy.
5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching
between Rate of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests
Title as shown in Schedule A.
Commitment Cover - WA (Revised 8-07)
SCHEDULE OF EXC'LUMONS FROM COVERAGE (con inised)
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE
INSURANCE FOR A ONE -TO -FOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE (10-22-03)
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting
from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws
and regulations concerning:
(a) building
(b) zoning
(c) Land use
(d) improvements on the C.and
(e) Land division
(f) environmental protection
This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears
in the Public Records at the Policy Date.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15 16, 17 or 24.
2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This
Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date,
3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless:
(a) a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or
(b) the taking happened before the Policy date and is binding on You if You bought the land without Knowing of the taking.
4. Risks:
(a) that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public records;
(b) that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they appeared in the Public Records at the Policy Date;
(c) that result in no loss to You; or,
(d) that first occur after the Policy Date y- this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22r 23, 24 or 25.
S. Failure to pay value for Your Title.
6. Lack of a right:
(a) to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and
(b) in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 18.
Commitment Cover - WA (Revised 8-07)
0 0
The matter; kstei beloww, each poiicy fo-rn are expressly excepted ronin t€he coverage of that policy and that poticy duffs net insure against kens or damage
{aryl the CamE�any Mil not pay ,_acts, attorneys' fees-cr expense -5; vihi,h arise. by reason. thereof.
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY — STANDARD COVERAGE
AND STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY
1. Taxes cr assessments which are nM oro payable or which are not shown as existing herbs by the rewords of any taxing arAh-.nty that levies taxes or
assessments on rest prop?rty or by the puNic records; praceedrngs by a pu85c agency ,which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
pro_eej?nras, .theth=r ar not shown by the records of such agency a, by the public records.
-`n'} fads, rig`ts• interc�ts or clarrr3 whi,^.h rr6 not sh7�+n by t public re corti5 but hhich ccvtd be au:ertained by are inspe,:tson of thE- larwj or :which
may tie n:s=rt d by tvrsons in prssesscn, or cknmin.7 to ie �o poc,e55irn, thescaf,
3. 5asernerm kers or �rcumbrances, er dams the,-aof, ;,teach are nat shown by the. pubi=c re_ords.
A. any enCr3a&,ment, encumbrance, violation, vanabon, or adverse c;r-um3tanc? affecting the Title that would tv drscicsed by an accurate and
coma i_te land survey of the Land, and that is not shown by the Public R=r.-ards,
S. Any lien, or right t0 a Jer5, For labor, ntateffai, s=r+ices or oquipment, or for Contributions to employee €:ehetit plans, or liens u=nder Workmar3
Cnnhpj insaticn Acts, not disclosed by th0 public racorcts.
5. (a) Unpatented rr�nirvg cdaims; ;L-) reserrabcns or excek-terns in patents or Ln Acts author¢rrxg the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty cr aboriginal
rights, mcluding, but rrot limned to, easements or equitable senjitucles; or, td) nater rights, dawns or title to neater, uheth?r 3r not the rnatters
ex(:eRted under (a), (b#, (c) or !d) are shown by the public records.
7. Right of use, control or rQ(fcimton by the UrNited States of America in the exerose of po•,aers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the
use, of upancy or rmprz?vement of the land resulting firm the rights of the public or riparian ovmers to use. any waters which may cove.' the land or
to use any portion of the land a hrrh ;s nov: or may formerly have been coffered by water.
S. Any ser�ir'e, in5tallaUcn.-crnecbon. maintenance or r,,.mtructr.n charges far sewer, nater, electr <". or garbage collection or disposal, nr -Alai
uv!iNes unless disclosed as an existing Icer by the public records.
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY — EXTENDED COVERAGE
t, Taxes or assessnhents rthrch are not now payabl.? Dr which are net shown as existing diens by the records of airy taxing authority that levies tares or'
assessments on re4 property cr by the public records; proceedings by a pWic agency hhrch may result in taxes or assessments; or notices of such
proceedings, whether nr not shown by the records of such ag3ncy or by the public records.
2. U)wterground easerrlents, servitudes or ii stabations which are not discksed by the public records.
3, (a) unpatented Mt Nng claims; (b) reservat;ons or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the usuanoe theraaf; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal
nghts, including, but not Limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, td) water rights, clams or title to water, whether or not the matters
excepted under fa), fh ), (c) or (d) are shovin t<y the public records.
'O'Cr regulatrcn by the hirced Srates of Arnenea in the exorcise of powers aver naargation; any proltrtmuon or kmitatrcni on the
4. night of use, CO�t
use, ocr_upan4Y ar inrprovement of the land resulting frau the right; of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or
to use any pontic n of the land which is nq%v or may formerly have been covered by water,
5. -fry s?rvr.:e, rnstal€atrcn, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electrx-rty, or garbage collection or disposal, or oth-�r
uioMt es unless disclosed is an exi5hng lien by the puhli; re-crds-
SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN EXTENDED COVERAGE ALTA LOAN POLICY (06-17-06)
and ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03)
w q�neral eXcr 7 cr appy r ii, these ,:Fvkcy fon;is.
Commitment Cover -SNA (Revised 8-07)
0 9
°3 14450 N.E. 29"' PI., #200
{ �.1,. Of
Bellevue, WA 98007
-T .r3 1 i C -)H -P C1.0 Pl,�r,. r 'a l Phone: 888-267-2301
1VIe trax: 42S-646-3513
Windermere Real Estate
Diane Charouhas
737 Market Street
Kirkland, WA 98033
SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 1 OF THE SECOND COMMITMENT
TITLE COMMITMENT NO. NWR] - 40052244
Re: File No.:
NWR3 - 40052244 - TO
Title Officer:
Nathan Warwick
Reference:
Buyer/Borrower(s):
William Finkbeiner
Seller(s):
Robert Anderson
Subject Property:
NA, Renton, WA
The following Note has been amended to read as follows:
Note 4: Based on information provided to the company, on the date of this commitment it appears that there
is located on the land:
a Vacant Land
known as:
NA
Renton, WA
EXCEPT as to the matters reported herein above, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT
been re-examined.
Dated: August 16, 2010
DWH
Supplemental Page 1 of 1
q V!
Know all men by tho?Se Presents; that we (1) the underskined, owners in fee. Y
siamle of the land describe re
ad herein, Kerebv declare this covenant an nla4_ T%j.
same on record. -19
A.
We (1) are (,am) the Owner($) In fee simple of the follottinq described real
estate situated if, Kinq County. State of Vashinaton, Tn wit-.
pp
011 WHICK WE (1) desire a single family residence serviced by a septic tack and
drairfield.
NOMHEPEFORE, we (1) agree and covenant that said cwnPr(s), their successors
and assigns will not construct or maintain, single family residence on less
than WD an one half aceas JZ 112). unless such second and subseauent residences
are connected and receive sewer service from a legally constituted sewer
district of m6nicipalfty.
These covenants shall run with the lard and shall tte binding on all Parties
having or accluirina any right, title, or interest in the land described
herein or any naet thereof, until a release of covenant is filed by the Seattle -
King County DeDartmwnt of Public Health nr its successor.
witness our bands this ay a
Nners
i<ErC� F 71. :'c
State of Washington -:PSI
County, of King
I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the above named rountv And State,
do hereby certify that on this day of
to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within
iimtruchemt, and acknowledge that they signed and sealed the same as (his)(her)
(their) free and VDIUnt4tV act and deed, fa: the uses and purposes her1n
mentioned.
Biwn under ny hand and official seat the day and year last above written.
Notar and for the State of Washington
7 v publd
reg dina at 79L.'--4;___'
FILED for Record at ReqUeStof
FRIO, AU -4, 'j
oeeartrler+t of Records and Elections
Room 311 County administration MY.
Ames's j L
r5
3rd and James .....................
F.
Seattle. Washington, 98104 )7 -
...........
,.S
Phoge 344 4215
%
.. �.
Gx' �:ina"t�la,%v3fG�`Tiffs'.+cr.�t;tit"ny�F'�r+��:�'�a7F5�?-::.7 �wi,:T: -
S*}
T
I
r it
I
Y = "N'
.01Lpr7
� ?5 _�• a -1
�
S*}
T
I
r it
I
Y = "N'
� ?5 _�• a -1
10.7
�
a l�aY�Sf��+e.�ra']`.�, ;;lAay�w��a:7 ^cRt•�•i �`"�k��1`- i'[ z�, L1rL 4,,qi'�
',
, (:1:111;1+hh_I,li1.11:1! til,' ft!'Y'UhlH•;�
�.
KNOW ALL kt N' 13Y THESE. PRGSE{s1T5, That MEtVYN ,TACK ROTi[IIUL`K�
bas Made, vonstitulted aucE .,1+lmiulrtl, .till I,y Llrr•:ar, 173'011cntn [it ,;!; 131.,1.,,,
y'
r
'Coa'stitute and appoint MBLVIN JACK ROT"ROCX, SR. his true anti
'
awful attorney,. for 170, and ir, his name, place. and stead, and '.
Far. his use and benefit, and to ask, deman<Z, sue for. recover, called'
L and receive. all such rums .gf money, debts, dues, accounts, legacies,-
;
bequests, interests, dividends, annuities and ciemane's ,:hatsoever, as
CSD
}
are now or shall hereafter become due, owing, cal'a51e o= be 10
r
to
:.
er
MELVIN JACK PAT11POCK, JR, , iln.l brave, liar d11ia t irAr' 231.1 wfit i
'
and means in his name, or otherwise, for the recovery thereof, by
y_
t=:
attachmcrcea, arrest, distress or OL!teYW9C, ;incl tri compromise a11d agree
h�
'
for the same, and to make, sign, seal and dciiver a c�cluittancr.s, or
.
ether sufficient discharges for tt:e same; :or him and in his nnwe,
7.,
-
to bargaini contract, a ree far, :
g purchase, roceive and take isncis
tenements,.hereditAMents, and accept tlse sci7.inq and pt►sseseior; nE .111
r=
r7
lands, and all deeds, and other assurances in the law. therefor;
-
i
1;
arid. to. iedse, let, demise, bargain, sell', remise, release, conv%-v,
mortgage and hypothecate lands, tenements, and hereditaments, ut+on
such terms and conditions and ua�t or such covenants as It e shall tfji11F;
{
fit;. to assign and transfer any mote or mortgage; to dedicate any
:i
street, avenue, alley, nlae0, way or Park for public uses. ALSO, to
g:
bargain'and agree far, buy., sell, mortgage,-htlpothecate, and in ariy
and -every Fray and mhnner'd,±al in and with roods, wares and merchandise,
`3
choses in action and other property, in possession or in actinn,
and.
to release inartgages on lands or chattels, and to Tjallce, do and
r
i
'
transact. all and eirery kind of bur.1ness al' whatsoever 'nature
and
kind, ANii, also, for him and in his name, and as li.s act and
s
des '. '.to .sign,' seal, execute, deliver and ack CVL g= such deeds,
`f
b
ti
leases and assignments of leases, -covenants, 111dFnturrs, agrC[`merltR,
martgayr.s, hYPOUldcatLolls, 1rutLom ins, c11.3rt@r pas t i.rs, Ui Lls a {'
'7.
euaaRy, RccwtRa
JORrr>to" a CURRAN
-}
A oil TCTS RT NAW oF. lttnrnay
R.�, we.w ie0y,
--
f etiY?�C`3e-..'u�Y",3., 7�tC+°i•.a' - .. � .}:. ,r. ISA"-...-_-_...._� � _ -A�p
i
r�
C;
2z day of June 14 76.
lading, bills,' bands, note., rrr-pil+tS,. ��V.ide?nr�?r: r,C �9chC,'rr.liasr•:: ,�n,i
+K
in the ,presence of. I
sal fill ir4:11,111H d j 1]1>11nhi!1, '11VI 41111-1. 1--1A r?, .ihll .i1j,114 6111,.1
r
instruments in writing, of whotsoever kind or nature, as may brt
k
''nacGssary or 73 roper- in the prumi ncs:
k` <
r -K
{,Ivm. Am.) [;RANfiNG un[.n his said attorney full power and
f
aulfidr.ity to do and perform a11. and ev,:ry act aild thing wheitgoavo r
.'
:.
Yequ s'site .,nd necesn3r7 to be do. -u is a.hd about the premises at; Cully
,
COUNTY
M
.
.to all intents and purposes as he might or could do, if personally.:
Signed-. a•Notaryy an or.tEle of
�-
present; MELV1N JACK itOTHRO'CK, JR. Hereby ratiEVing and
F;
cia-
:
confirming allthat his said attorney shall lawfully da or cause
uses-and'purposes:therein mentioned.
g. .
to be done, by virtue of these presents.
IN WITNESS WHER60F , � have hereunto set my hand and 'seal the
2z day of June 14 76.
Sign@d and sealed artd'deiivered Melvin• Jack Rothrock, Jr.'
in the ,presence of. I
A ,i..
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
'OF
COUNTY
M
.
on this day of J 19�, before rne, the under-' '
Public in State Washington, 'duly
Signed-. a•Notaryy an or.tEle of
Ca miesionecl .olid sworn, personally appeared MELVIN JACK. ROTHROCK, 7R.,
to me known -to- be'the individual 'des ceibed in and.who executed the
f6regoing-in5trur6enf, and acknowledged to'me'-that he sign@d'and seale
th+r said`insirurnentLas 'I. is free and vOluntary act and deed for the
uses-and'purposes:therein mentioned.
[,iiTN$SS my hand and. official seal hereto affixed 'the day and year
`.n thio certificate Shove -written.
-
:Yc
NCffrARyBLIC in na or t e,StatX
of WaL gton, .re icling at
CURRAN. HL[rrwa:
JONN�ON-� CYNISAM
-
'nr
KWr. Nf/n RE911 -
pagc 2 Power ni' nttnrnm,.
4
AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF
PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN
City of Renton Planning Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 '-;'rt
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
)f )
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF ICING
being first
duly sworn on oath, deposes and says:
1. On the day of� , 20_L�:L_, I installed public
information ign(s) and plastic fl",
ly o on the property located at
i L �fo`r�hefollowing pr ject:
Pr ject name
r---->
LLL ,.Aj EeEA3 11-
Owner Name
2. 1 have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to
indicate the location of the installed sign.
3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in
locations in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal
Code and the City's "Public Information Si s fns Ration" handout package.
Installer Signature
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before rre-this day of i , 20� .
Notary Public '
State of Washington
DONNA J R11 OTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington,
My Appointment Expires Dec 28, 2013
esiding at 4
My commission expires on rt
H:%CED\Data\Forms-Templates�Self--Help Handouts\Planninglpubsign.doc - 3 - 0310612009
0 6
NOTES:
I
Uso4'X4'x12'POSTS
a I- PROPOSED LAND
USE ACTION e
f �
x
(Provided by APPlicni)
Type of Aatiarl: (Prods
--
SITE MAP_ _ _ _ _ _ —
Project Name: (Provided byAppllcant)
Laminated t
€+
� If
Site Address: (Provided by Applicant)
; t
�c
installed by AppGcant
YoSUBlutITCOMMENTS OROBTAIN
L ------------------ J
AD101 ifONAL INFORMATION PLEASE
O CONTACT CITY OF: RENTON STAFF AT:
�
v
Oevelaptnent Services Division
- — i
1055 South Grady Way
reserved far
� i PLASTIC i
Renlon, Washington 98055
i City provided ; CASE
o
(425) 430-7200
PUBLIC j ! Installed by F
r'
NOTICE applicant
Please reference the pmject number- If no
5'X14''
number is listed reference the projecl name.
Installer Ir.structAors:
Please ensure the bottom of
the sign does not
exceed 48" frcrl the grciAnd.
X
97
NOTES:
I
Uso4'X4'x12'POSTS
Use 4'x 8'x 1.2" PLYWOOD
Use 112" 3" GALV. LAG BOLTS- W+VIIASHZRS
f �
x
LETTERING: �
Use HELVETICA LETTERING,
€+
� If
13LACK ON WHITE BACKGRDUND.
�c
T)7LE WALL CAPS
4' OTHFR 1112" CAPS and t" LOWER CASE
H:%CED1DataTorms-Templates\Seif-Help HandoutsTfanninglgubsign.dm -4- 03/06/2009
Pzintcd: 12-22-2010
CITY OF RENTON
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Land Use Actions
3f
u}i
RECEIPT
,
Permit#: LUA10-090
;, ,
Payment Made: 12/22/2010 02:15 PM Receipt Number: R1005591
Total Payment: 5,150.00 Payee: WILLIAM EDWARD AND KRISTEN
STIENHAUSEN FINKBEINER
Current Payment Made to the Following Items:
Trans
Account Code
Description
Amount
------
3080
------------------
503.000000.004.322
------------------------------
Technology Fee
----------------
150.00
5010
000.000000.007.345
Environmental Review
1,000.00
5011
000.000000.007.345
Prelim/Tentative Plat
4,000.00
Payments made for this receipt
Trans Method Description Amount
---------- -------- ----
Payment Check 1020
Account Balances
Trans Account Code Description
3021 303.000000.020.345 Park Mitigation Fee
3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee
5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees
5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers
5008 000.000000.007.345 Sinding Site/Short Plat
5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees
5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review
5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat
5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat
5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD
5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees
5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment
5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks
5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone
5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt
5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev
5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval
5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence
5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees
5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee
5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend
5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies
5941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable)
5954 650.237.00.00.0000 DO NOT USE - USE 3954
5998 000.000000.000.231 Tax
5,150.00
Balance Due
---------------
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
Remaining Balance Due; $0.00
-
LU A-- XX- XXX- FP
LND-XX-XXXX
13
NA,
-�.i_.fit,.. -&`;,-�.}:s-'-b,::_ :.,. ^. .,.�.kE:�.s` ""� ,'e. `<�'_ �""�.". yi':-rNWS ;�mS=WT-R W. M .
C ITY��0-:5-,REN T NAKI NG:.0 U N 1Y WASHINGTON
.
_FGA!_ DE. EASEMENT PROVISIONS /� ES:
TH S 0TH1S.. RELIINAR: PLAT::ARE.,.FOR'_.THE .LIMITED PURPOSES .
s T.'< UARIER OF....THE_ SOU .HW ST. UA TE OE ..SECTION 1,1 TQWNSNIP 23 E...EA E EN S..� .
THAT a ORT 0 .OF. T E NORTHWES < .. E R ,.. _ _ M - T T �_ _
A: s rs<? �c .•r.. •s1r. ... .: �._,st.�,�„ t;..a,: ,yesxN y t*,:
,+:.. '" S.%ke< v.. .. -.._ .. H. .... .... .... ... `c .'. +..-....., .r ., .. .:. .;1 d,...> thi�..'e.
.. P.. • .-l...
:.�`.......- ..:.c .:.. ,..-- .- h - „• ,.+:c.^ --j'r. R'..'..r ,
^- -ems .c. _`s. {'Y• ...J _.-ia ',�: •:
NORTH==RANGEF-5.-uEAST;aLW:M:;;SIN -KING BOUNTY;WASHINGTON;�—DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:—�= ���-
��:� LISTED -BELOW AND SHALL BE� CONVEYED FOLLOWING- THE RECORDING OFA I AL P .-
BEGINNING. AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11., THENCE SOUTH
AN EASEMENT IS HEREBY GRANTED AND CONVEYED TO THE . CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
ALONG THE WEST 'LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 330 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ,u P�r,�.ry
rA-< ,.-
THENCE EAST 1320 FEET, MORE 'OR LESS, TO THE. EAST LINE OFSUBDIVlSION;#90,PUGETSOUND 'ENERGY, QWEST, COMCAST, THE OWNERS OF ALL LOTS WITHIN THIS PLAT AND THEIR
THENCE SOUTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 315 FEET; RESPECTIVE. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, UNDER, OVER AND UPON THOSE EASEMENTS DESIGNATED AS
THENCE WEST 645 FEET; _ "UTILITY EASEMENT", THE EXTERIOR 10 FEET PARALLEL WITH AND ADJOINING THE STREET ' FRONTAGE OF ALL
THENCE NORTH 157.5 FEET; LOTS AND TRACTS IN WHICH.-TO INSTALL, LAY CONSTRUCT, RENEW, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN UNDERGROUND .
THENCE WEST 675 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; CONDUITS, CABLE, PIPELINE, AND WIRES WITH THE NECESSARY FACILITIES AND OTHER EQUIPMENT FOR THE
THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 157.5:FEET TO THE TRUE. POINT OF BEGINNING; PURPOSE OF SERVICE TO THIS SUBDIVISION AND OTHER PROPERTY WITH ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS, CABLE
T.V. SERVICE, SEWER, WATER AND DRAINAGE TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE EASEMENTS
EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR .ROAD; AT ALL TIMES FOR THE PURPOSES STATED. NO LINES OR WIRES FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRIC
CURRENT, OR FOR TELEPHONE USE, CABLE TELEVISION, FIRE OR POLICE SIGNAL FOR OTHER PURPOSES,
AND EXCEPT THE NORTH �F.EET OF THE WEST " FEET; SHALL BE PLACED ' UPON ANY LOT UNLESS THE SAME SHALL BE UNDERGROUND OR IN CONDUIT ATTACHED
- TO A BUILDING
2. THE 12 PRIVATE ACCESS=`EASEMENTS OVER LOTS 3 AND 4 ARE FOR THE BENEFIT OF LOTS 2 AND 5
RESPECTIVELY. MAINTENANCE OF SAID EASEMENTS SHALL BE SHARED IN EQUAL PARTS BY THE OWNERS OF
RESTRICTIONS OF R CORD LOTS 2 AND 3 . AND THE OWNERS OF LOTS 4 AND 5 FOR THEIR RESPECTIVE EASEMENTS.
�=�PER��COMMONWEAL .H ORDER:` NUMBER,, 40,052244, .
RECORDED. YF.UNDER .RECORDING
1. SUBJECT TO ESERVATIONS CONTAINED l D.E.ED FROM PRR C� . P_ .
xn�:: >
NUMBER6fi514 RESERVIING MINERAL` AND OTHER RIGHTS: SAID RESERV,4TION SIS X'' BLANKET AND NOT RESTRICTIONS 1= �R CRITICALAREA TRACT AND CRITICALAR AN BUFFERS
PLOTTABLE.
z ?= -,,: TRACT/CRITICAL AREA AND. BUFFER CONVEYS TO, THE PUBLIC A BENEFICIAL
0F, A,�CRITICAL,..AREA. C L
a ...:, DEDICATION. /
OVE A T . LM _:'OS D BYw:-I ST, U E RECORDED `UN.DER
RECORDING, , .,...,::.�.._ ..r..._<.
2 �.�,:S.UBJ QCT TO •-DECLARATION r,DF,�,C, .._ NN P E ..... .,,. N... R M NT ,_. .. _ .� . �� �. .
, .. . .r.. ., -�..k, z.......,.,. . b.. u.:.,. _., ...v „<..... z. . , ..! .....,r: ..._x...�. .s.. "F.-a.....,,,._._._ .,�,::- tt',= 2U::i%. e=s a;...S.:a.K...::._.k,.caa=x.. r., .....,.. _ ':3: :'r: r -"�: .
INTEREST IN �yTHE--LAND- WITHIN ,THE TRACT CRITICAL .AREA AND BUFFER.. THIS INTEREST INCLUDES THE
`NUMBER 8103190403:`-'``NOT PLOTTABLE. ., TRACT/
CRITICAL
OF NATIVE VEGETATION FOR ALL PURPOSES. THAT BENEFIT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY' AND
3. SUBJECT TO THE TERMS ND. CONDITIONS OF CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 461.2, AS RECORDED UNDER.. WELFARE, INCLUDING CONTROL OF SURFACE WATER AND EROSION, MAINTENANCE OF SLOPE STABILITY, AND
RECORDING NUMBER9fi 62109-66 PROTECTION OF. PLANT AND ANIMAL HABITAT. THE CRITICAL AREAS TRACT/CRITICAL AREA AND BUFFER IMPOSES
_ UPON ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE OWNERS AND OCCUPIERS OF THE LAND SUBJECT TO THE TRACT/CRITICAL AREA
AND BUFFER THE OBLIGATION,. ENFORCEABLE ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC BY CITY OF RENTON, TO LEAVE
0
UNDISTURBED ALL TREES. AND OTHER VEGETATION WITHIN THE TRACT/CRITICAL . AREA AND BUFFER. THE VEGETATION
WITHIN THE -TRACT/.CRITICAL AREA AND BUFFER MAY NOT BE
CUT, PRUNED, COVERED BY FILL, REMOVED. OR
DAMAGED WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING. FROM THE CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 'OR
VESTED OWNERS. ITS SUCCESSOR AGENCY, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY LAW.
ROBERT LYNN = & GALE LEE ANDERSON THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE TRACT/CRITICAL AREA AND BUFFER AND THE AREA OF DEVELOPMENT
i 3607g,,4 --AVENUE SE ACTIVITY MUST BE MARKED OR OTHERWISE FLAGGED. TO THE SATISFACTION. OF CITY OF RENTON PRIOR TO ANY
.,..� f �
NORJ END, WA.. 98045.:
CLEARING, GRADING, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER DEVELOPMENT 'ACTIVITY: ON A LOT 'SUBJECT TO THE
CRITICAL AREA TRACT/CRITICAL AREA AND BUFFER. : THE REQUIRED MARKING OR FLAGGING SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE.
UNTIL ALL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL ACTIVITIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE. CRITICAL AREA ARE COMPLETED.
OLympu Vi LLA
ENGINEER:
NO BUILDING FOUNDATIONS ARE ALLOWED BEYOND THE 15-FOOT BUILDING SETBACK LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE
.OFFS ENGINEERS, PLLC - PROVIDED BY LAW.
C/0 DARREL Z4b_ FFE, PE
13932 t SE -'159TH PLACE
RENT,ON; WA..98045
LUA-XX-XXX-FP
LND-XX-XXXX
7:11I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.........,.
::�
wM
TYPE 1 B
3.36
IES 515.02
514.96
J
NW 1/4, S 1/4, SEC. 11 T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M.
CITY OF. RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
PARCEL N0. I �ARCEL N0.
11230599084 23059032
CATEGORY 3 WETLAND- WITH 25 \
1310FFER. SEE WETLAND REPORT:
\ PARCEL NO.
123059039
\ 1
1
,,,.. 16 A
I 7n'_.�.,���. 111
0
5
6,326 sq. ft.
101
■■
2"CONC(N)IE=515.57
, 2"CONC(S)IE=515.02
ITt
l L CL` L1YV1.123059 04.-3059040 2$
\12"A
70'
109. 18'cw �� �� _.8.• 7f .;
2 "CW
S A�
20-c f�' :......: 278'
0 12"a P' .► -�_ 199'
12"A -- J _ fit. 26.5 6 `•A \ `M` .. . /•f.'1- u- - -- -- ---- - Z� ;�7 - - - --
g"q `, �q,3L6 SCS. 1-2
' 127A 1 .. ..,
�DQ2 -A
1
N " 18C 1
8,706 sq. f` r o ,4
A / •1 �f �+
14-A � •'•'.'.. '•'.'�'•', EASTERN WETL4N
N !� LOCA O
16"cw "A e-�'ROVID N
�``' ` •��BOLINDARYPROViDED BY Bl OG
`t fi 2fi4 s ft. -.� .�.� .....�. .y �•
..
5,491 sq.9ft.(NET) "� l.•.....•....y... , ......•,:.� ;�,..•.•.,1 \ 0
26.
�-, A�$. .: ' F R •WET • E� •. '� ��
70' `5 6"A F�EPpRT.:•:.'.` `...;• :::'•'•'•'•'•' '•.{
"
-'
Nt
24 W •A r
10.5 U3 ;�-.:•:•;•:.;•;•:`�•..-.... .... -;-
C3 " . �. / 1
36.24'��`�'4 c `- :B7�s a.•sq:.•f .•. •� �,
293.,1 2 s ft. LL,J R`�F `I U
__ _--___ k V 2 2 S.F. ,•.•.•.. -� f, .. 25 v
18"cw 12 "cYl `. ; . ,
1 0 1 �. ., /
;:. . , ,.': •# TRA
14"cW 7 5 s ft. 1
_QT
� q•
r` 5,909 sq. Q p '� �.•,•. ..-. .� �-- {
5,050 sq. ft.(NE'" S30 .:.3..:.:..
ts-
/ �, . a
/rte 16"4w f •' •� \ '
1 _ -
(p
. �1
A\ 53563 sq: ft.
'� , s, 23
14 6 � 1
/
012A t :ul /
�-�--- 3' 26.5' 26.5'
c p)
�r
22 QL
_ N.s727-21 " �--
� 199
..TOP EL -531.78
INV. EL.= -+/--521.78.
22
G
TABLE
TAG #
LENGTH
DIRECTION/DELTA
RADIUS
Cl
35.91
20634'22"
100.00
C2
31.98
18' 19'19"
100.00
C3
10.45
5'59'22"
100.00
C4
36.16
8' 17' 11 "
250.00
1
103.08
N
'00* 17'36.'
E
L2
95.07
N
87'27'21 "
W
L3.
54.42.
N
00' 17'36"
E
L4
.7.64
S
00' 14'50"
W