No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1N O N F -- W W Z (z V LA V z Q W W z a J 7 1 .O LU VL 0 a� 0 C CL k a N w � cic V ❑ Ci Q `u � W z � Ray & Julie Johnson 18808 SE 170th Street Renton, WA 98058 tel: (425) 255-4709 (party of record) Greg Smith King County Library System 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, WA 98027 tel: (425) 369-3237 (applicant) PARTIES OF RECORD RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY LUA12-022, CU -H, SA -H, MOD, ECF Phillip D. LeTourneau, PhD Archaeologist King County Historic Preservation Program Department of Natural Resources and Parks 201 Jackson Street [MS: KSC-NR- 0700] ste: #700 Seattle, WA 98104 (party of record) Maaike Post Miller Hull Partnership 71 Columbia Street, 6th Floor Seattle, WA 98104-1031 tel: (206) 682-6837 eml: mpost@millerhull.com (contact) Gretchen Kaehler Assistant State Archaeologist Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504 (party of record) Updated: 05/16/12 (Page 1 of 1) Co,a* g ? iWrnjCf AVE.S 4 g� S : 4'YY �L"3y �N�2 'C'tafq' m z M n WA'friO AVES. p 1n m n a4P Gg _ _ SIBi3�A'91A'E5. AI I� zcL' CA 91 rn rn "-4ETI AVE. s_— `-_ t _ f 1_ . � - - - _ P2 � � � � � � � g x Q 1 2 8 A Y g rn X m n, RENTON LIBRARY 510 SOUTH 3RD STREET RENTON, WA 98055 m t��:saHsFoi� - �. a xg axe„ v L--�- SITE PLAN REVIEW & 1009: 50 Ucrl Z88 ZEE x za? 3.27.2012 *9rIf _1W MORRIS AYE S. r ' =mz ��G) s SAMTHER'S AVE. S. rel LOGAN AVE. S. 'i7n rno. y pp RENTON LIBRARY 1 3� 510 SOUTH 3RD STREET I RENTON, WA 98055 ' W SITE PLAN REVIEW & 1000/6 SD 1� �_;� a 3.27.2012 " o N-R�3�G 3 S Meq H mar i m j `j r m - ----' K j © WJ r — EF_. _ - — ifl C1il l-0 v — CD a' i i =ng n r W RENTON LIBRARY M SOUTH 3RD STREET RENTON, WA 98055 Q O z� N SITE PLAN REVIEW & loo o SD N n.zx I 3.27.2012 ►C1� a RENTON LIBRARY 510 SOUTH 3RD STREET I RENTON, WA 96055 D 3c° i z C! N N T� =a= SITE PLAN REVIEW & 100% So RUcrJ --..�!V -P:?� ? - 3.27.2012/ fzs�r¢F N �m p Z r0 O Z n: Co C o m x Ira r -C / Ir -r 111 / it -p y s -IC zr-.r / 27 2m p,�p 5 !I i I I I I ,R • . \ t AWE F' PERYM ARn tYFERFl PIN •A' uEP =f.H �f PEN M. 3Y S SLL E 1+'-BFiMM aLOPE IY'RENF'RI4 01 ! APE S , �I Y .i R 3CPE is 9 a , £Si IL IIERFI RIN 'l'PER FMN iU N 50 i - ----- t P� $ o ;g 7f RENTON LIBRARY 4�0 L 0 m " s ;''� 510 SOUTH 3RD STREET I RENTON, WA 98055 F4 NQ z is .�. SITE PLAN REVIEW & 100% SID 3.27.2012Na1� 1j_ n � ,m m �, ❑ am E9tn. Nni o 0 D x V Sr m 0 o mm. G) x - h Y. 4 r rr u� ------------------------------ - - r r .. - � q v ----------------------------- 'C' ---------'C' w � 9 q q c "sem pp yQ� 83 �� .. / u•:c s ar.�• o�a ; �� RENTON LIBRARY 1 Q C n x 510 SOUTH 3RO STREET I RENTON, WA 98055 _Qiyy, HUN - Z�- SCFE PLAN REVIEW & 10O% SD ?!?tori p� $ ] s 3.27.2012 !.s v $ z� Nu-m� 4 8 3N ,gym RENTON LIBRARY 510 SOUTH 3RD STREET I RENTON• WA 98055 R_ SITE PLAN REVIEW 8100°% sb"' . rR� oR s 1 17 ont? CT._ pu -00 r i 7 1 J4 i � >. O ri. SYRMERS AVE. S.v GCM A* !.s v $ z� Nu-m� 4 8 3N ,gym RENTON LIBRARY 510 SOUTH 3RD STREET I RENTON• WA 98055 R_ SITE PLAN REVIEW 8100°% sb"' . rR� oR s 1 17 ont? CT._ pu -00 C � O Z a M WDVIN AvE. S, _-�- I TN F - 7 54P'.EF'S w S ` -- I I I r• - 411 v� n m m RENTON LIBRARY CL 510 SOUTH 3R0 STREET I RENTON, WA 88055, ; H O � 3 nni a \c0��'Or•\ �'��� 3, to m v SITE PLAN REVIEW & 100% RENTON LIBRARY r.aa 516 SOUTH 3RD STREET RENTON. WA 98055, z� 0 W SITE PLAN REVIEW & 100% Sf:q 97 mi i sR�;�p' - 3" •v � ns r A r R RENTON LIBRARY r.aa 516 SOUTH 3RD STREET RENTON. WA 98055, z� 0 W SITE PLAN REVIEW & 100% Sf:q 97 mi i sR�;�p' - 3" K � � dm =m Ir) 2 ¥ RENTON LIBRARY § \ | \ | IT soSOUTH moSTREET �#Ro __e, ■ PLAN REVIEW || �■||.. i � � dm =m Ir) 2 ¥ RENTON LIBRARY soSOUTH moSTREET �#Ro __e, ■ PLAN REVIEW a—) &1a%k�� � � dm =m Ir) 2 I _ - Morris Avenue Souch %,� "R I I - 'f :'0 11rad_- xj 1ypk 04 ra Smichers .* � i` 3 Avenue Soupy s a — Y am i I roan Avenue Sour/? F. da ^� Ali P RENTON LIBRARY #+ 510 SOUTH 3RD STREET I RENTON. WA 98055 •� ZU± C s'r9 M1 } O m M �° SITE PLAN REVIEW & 100% S Axe } s�f� p� m I ae ZA 2 P= a •Pon r ala Tom 3R4 ST, REAfi0A4 As MD SAMMMMAI TOPOGRAPHO SMUMRVEY IMG 00MUNNTY LIEPMY SYSTEM a- PUT (OPAC�-E QU.4 WA ------- ---- -- ..... . ...... r r- rn z 4 z r a 0 0 m SHATTUCK AVE, S. WHITWORTH AVE. S. n MORRIS AVE, S. SMITHER'S AVE. S. 4 Lp J �_ BURNETT AVE. S. WILLIAMS AVE. S. __ yo G� fi 3' O WELLS AVE. S. _ o �7 <m °0 3 LOGAN AVE. S. 0mvX nim z -m 0Tnz i z r � z m-1 — O fn O m zz =iz D � m Q' a m nv-,u__� z I�z m: co -n _-4 x,00 cn0 mXz nz z�_' 5� m M 2 g! o DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY City of AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT "< ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS -M) - MITIGATED Pursuant to WAC 197-11-600(4)(c) and WAC 197-11-625 Addendum to the Downtown Renton as Addended by the City of Renton LUA12-022 Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS -M) Date of Addendum: July 23, 2012 Date of Original Issuance of SEPA Threshold Determination: May 14, 2012 Proponent: King County Library System Project Number: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD Project Name: Renton Downtown Library Proposal / Purpose of Addendum: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), received Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification approval for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 square feet of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property. The site is also located within Design District 'A'. There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by Big 5, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site which is proposed for demolition/removal as part of the proposal. Additionally, Gateway Park is located on the eastern portion of the site which would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library. The proposed restriping of the existing parking area, to the north within a City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement, would create two additional parking spaces along with the addition of six new stalls, resulting in a total of 50 onsite parking stalls. Access to the site would be gained via two curb cuts; one along Morris Ave S through to Logan Ave S. The applicant is requesting an addendum to amend Mitigation Measure #3 of the SEPA threshold Determination of Non -Significance -- Mitigated (DNS -M): 3. A survey shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager that conforms to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the on-site supervision of a state -approved archaeologist prior to construction permit approval. Addendum to Environmental (S,,A) Review Page 2 of 3 July 23, 2012 The project site currently contains an existing commercial building and a small parking lot. Because demolition and excavation work needs to occur, in order for the archeologist to perform the required survey, the applicant would like to amend the measure so that the archeological survey would be required during construction, nor prior to construction permit approval. It has been determined that the environmental impacts of the proposal were adequately addressed under the analysis of significant impacts contained within the previous DNS -M. However, the mitigation prescribed by City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC) would not allow for the ground disturbance needed in order to determine if archeologiocal resources are present. Based on WAC 197-11-600(4) c, the addendum process may be used if analysis or information is added that does not substantially change the analysis of significant impacts and alternatives in the existing environmental document. The determination by the ERC will not change the analysis or impacts in the 1995 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Review. However, this addendum will modify the Mitigation Measure of the DNS -M issued on May 14, 2012 to read: 3. A survey shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager that conforms to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the on-site supervision of a state -approved archaeologist prior to building permit approval. The City of Renton is hereby issuing a SEPA Addendum pursuant to WAC 197-11-600. This Addendum is appropriate because it contains only minor information not included in the original Determination and there no environmental impacts related to inclusion of the new information. Location: 510 S 3rd St Lead Agency: City of Renton, Department of Community & Economic Development Review Process: Addendum to previously issued Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS -M) Additional Information: if you would like additional information, please contact Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, City of Renton Planning Division, Department of Community & Economic Development at (425) 430-7219. There is no comment period for this Addendum, dated July 23, 2012 issued by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee. Addendum to Environmental (S. -.,A) Review Page 3 of 3 July 23, 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SIGNATURES: SIG ;/ ,1 1 Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Date Public Works Department Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Date Community Services Department Mark Peterson Administrator Fire & Emergency Services Department C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator/Planning Director Department of Community & Economic Development Date City of I Mn Deportment of Community & Economic opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MAY 3, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, D A DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 19, 2012 APPLICANT: Greg Smith, KCLS 0 / ROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons Jr PROJECT TITLE: Renton Downtown Library PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 24,070 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): LOCATION: 510 S 3rd Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 15,083 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 square feet of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property_ There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by BigS, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site which is proposed for demolition/removal as part of the proposal. Additionally, Gateway Park is located on the eastern portion of the site which would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library. The proposed restriping of the existing parking area, to the north within a City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement, would create two additional parking spaces along with the addition of 6 new stalls, resulting in a total of 50 onsite parking stalls. The applicant is requesting a parking modification in order to decrease the minimum of parking spaces required onsite from 60 to 50 stalls. Access to the site is proposed via two curb cuts; one along Morris Ave S through to Logan Ave S. There are no critical areas located on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet n l9 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we hove expertise and hove identified areas of proboble impact or areas where additional irtfAnation is nerded to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director ar—ICuthorized Represe`Ti6five Date Hearing Examiner's Decision Denis Law ---- City of Mayor ... tan City Clerk -Bonnie I. Walton July 6, 2012 Greg Smith King County Library System 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, WA 98027 Re: Decision for Renton Downtown Library, LUA-12-022, ECF, CU, SA, MOD Dear Mr. Smith: Attached is your copy of the Hearing Examiner's Decision dated July S, 2012, in the above - referenced matter. If 1 can provide further information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. vlton City Clerk Enc.: Hearing Examiner's Decision cc: Hearing Examiner Larry Warren, City Attorney Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager Neil Watts, Development. Service Director Karen Kittrick, CED Stacy Tucker, Development Services Parties of Record (4) 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • (425) 430-6510/ Fax (425) 430-6516 • rentonwa.gov r Maaike Post Miller Hull Partnership 71 Columbia Street, 6th Floor Seattle, WA 95104 Ray & Julie Johnson 188808 SE 170" Street Renton, WA 98058 Greg Smith King County Library System 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, WA 98027 Gretchen Kaehler Dept of Archaeology P.Q. Box 48343 Olympia, WA 985,04 Phillip LeTourneau KC Historic Preservation Prog 201 Jackson Street, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98104 • \ Y ttiquettes faciles a peter ; A Repliez A la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com ; Utilisez leabarit AVERY8 51600 Sens de r6v6ler le rebard Pap-upmf ' 1 -800 -GO -AVERY ' 9 j chargemeni j 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON RE: King County Library System Conditional Use, Site Plan, SEPA Review and Parking Modification LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD } Summary FINAL DECISION The King County Library System (KCLS) has applied for a conditional use permit, site plan approval and parking modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot library at 510 South 3rd St. The conditional use permit, site plan and parking modification are approved with conditions. Testimony Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, testified that the subject site is bordered by a Seattle Public Utilities easement to the north, Logan Avenue to the east, South 3rd Street to the south and a commercial property on the western boundary. The site is 0.55 acres and located in the urban Center Downtown (CD) zoning classification. It is located within design district "A". An existing retail space and parking lot would be demolished in order to build the proposed structure. The existing Gateway Park would be redesigned to provide an entry plaza for the new library. A 15,000 sq. ft. structure, along with associated parking, landscaping, and infrastructure improvements, is proposed. Access to the site would be provided via Morris Avenue South to Logan Avenue South. The existing parking lot would be re -striped for a total of 50 parking stalls. CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The proposal requires a Hearing Examiner site plan and design review and a conditional use permit. Additionally, the Applicant is requesting a parking modification to reduce the minimum number of parking stalls required by RMC 4-4-080 from 60 to 50 spaces. Staff held a 14 -day comment period beginning on April 29' 2012. During this period, the Department of Archaeology noted the potential of an archaeological site in the area. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated on May 14, 2012, which included five mitigation measures related to impact fees and archaeological consideration. No appeals were filed during the appeal period from May 18, 2012 to June 1, 2012. Staff is recommending that the application be required to comply with the 5 mitigation measures outlined in the report. Ms. Timmons stated that Staff reviewed the site plan in order to ensure consistency with design district regulations outlined in RMC 4-3-100. The proposed structure is concentrated in the western portion of the site with a 1.5 foot setback from the south property line. The front entry would face the redesigned plaza along Logan Avenue. Six canopies are proposed along South 3rd Street. Staff recommends the Applicant be required to obtain a right of way use permit for the canopies prior to receiving a building permit approval. The dark brown -colored area on the site plan is part of the proposal (it is where the offices will be located). Canopies and concrete forms will be used to break the fagade along South 3rd Street. Additionally, various roof forms reduce the apparent bulk of the facility. The proposal includes a variety of building materials such as concrete, aluminum, and terra cotta panels. The site currently contains 28 trees which would all be removed during construction. The Applicant is proposing 2,500 sq. ft. of landscaping to enhance the appearance of the project. The proposed facility would require a 100 sq, ft. refuse and recycle area. The Applicant is proposing the area along the northern fagade as this area. Staff recommends that the Applicant submit a revised plan with elevations that provide for a roof covering of the recycle area. Staff is in support of reducing the number of required parking spaces as there are over 600 spaces within a 1 -block radius of the site. Appropriate public services have been provided to accommodate the proposal. In regard to the conditional use permit, Staff reviewed the proposal to ensure that the library is appropriate for the site and not detrimental to the public welfare. The current location is approximately 0.5 mile from the new site. The new location is more urban in character and is an extremely accessible area. Staff believes the proposed structure is compatible in scale and character with the existing neighborhood. Staff recommends approval of the new library, subject to three conditions of approval. Upon questioning from the Hearing Examiner, Ms. Timmons noted that there are 137 parking stalls along the street and a parking garage north of the site. To her knowledge, the parking facilities in the area are not being used to their current capacities. The Applicant is not proposing to do anything with the current library site. CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The mitigations recommended by the Environmental Review Committee include the requirement for an archaeological review prior to any construction. The parking modification is being consolidated into the Hearing Examiner review process. Parking is off-site (located within an casement of the property), and the existing pavement will be used. The north facade is not along the street, thus the only site only fronts onto South 3rd Street and a small portion of Logan Avenue. Exhibits The June 12, 2012 Staff Report Exhibits 1-10 identified at part 2 of the Staff Report itself were admitted into the record during the hearing. In addition, the Staff PowerPoint presentation from the hearing was admitted as Ex. 11. FINDINGS OF FACT Procedural: Applicant. King County Library System (CLS). 2. Heate. The Examiner held a hearing on the subject application on June 19, 2012 at 1:00 pm in the City of Renton Council Chambers. Substantive: 3. Project Description. The King County Library System (KCLS) has applied for a conditional use permit, site plan approval and parking modification toward the construction of a new 15,083 sq. ft. public library with associated parking, landscaping and infrastructure improvements. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 sq. ft. of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property in the Urban Center Downtown (UC -D) Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation. The site is also located within Design District `A'. The site is bordered on the north by a City of Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) easement, on the east by Logan Avenue South, on the south by South 3rd Street and on the west by a zero lot -line commercial property. Across Logan Avenue South is the Renton Piazza. There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by Big 5 sporting goods store, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site. The retail structure is approximately 13,444 sq. ft. in size with 42 existing parking stalls located on-site. Additionally, Gateway Park is located on the eastern portion of the site. The Applicant is proposing to demolish the existing retail building and restripe the existing parking lot with the addition of eight new parking stalls for a total of 50 total parking stalls. The park would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library. The proposed restriping of the existing parking area to the north within a City of Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) easement would create two additional CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 parking spaces along with the addition of 6 new stalls, resulting in a total of 50 onsite parking stalls. The Applicant is requesting a parking modification from RMC 4-4-080 in order to decrease the minimum number of parking spaces required onsite from 60 to 50 stalls. Access to the site is proposed via two curb cuts; along Morris Avenue South through to Logan Avenue South. There are no critical areas located on site. The building is oriented to the street and easement with minimal setbacks from the property lines. The front entry would face the redesigned east plaza, along Logan Avenue South, and allows for entry from all three sides. A prominent entrance is visible from the north parking area as well as the South 3rd Street sidewalk. Additionally a large canopy, 30 feet in width, would provide cover for pedestrians approaching from all directions. The proposed building is designed appropriately to allow adequate light and air circulation to the building and the site. The design of the structures would not result in excessive shading of the property. In addition, there is ample area surrounding the building to provide normal air -flow. The full civic scale of the proposed library is more prominently visible from the proposed plaza cast of the building and also from the Renton piazza to the east of the proposed plaza. The proposal includes a variety of building materials: concrete, aluminum, windows, and terra cotta panels. The terra cotta wall areas would be comprised of two shades of color and would reflect vertical banding. The concrete elements would display form tic patterns and panel jointing (Exhibit 5). The scale and bulk of the building is reduced through the use of differing materials on the building facades, building articulation and modulation and differing roof profiles. The Applicant has proposed the use of canopies and concrete forms to break down the facade along South 3rd Street into smaller increments. The building incorporates two roof forms to reduce the apparent bulk of the facility. Additionally the building steps back from South 3rd Street to provide clerestory light and to reduce the apparent mass of the building along the facade. The refuse and recycle facilities are proposed to be screened with an enclosure that matches the materials of the proposed structure; terra cotta masonry panels. The refuse and recyclables area would be accessible from the SPU parking easement. 4. Adequacy of Infrastructure/Public Services_. The project will be served by adequate infrastructure and public services as follows: A. Water and Sewer Service. The site is served by the City of Renton for all utilities. There is a 1 -inch domestic water meter serving the existing building. There is an existing 12 - inch water main in South 3rd Street. The preliminary fire flow requirement per the Fire Marshal's office is 2,250 gallons per minute (gpm). All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm each. One primary hydrant is required within 150 feet from the building and two additional hydrants are required within CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 $ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1.8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 300 feet of the building. One new hydrant is required and is shown on the plan. The final hydrant location will require approval by the Fire Department to meet the City standards. Any existing hydrants counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting, if not already in place and subject to verification by the Fire Department. There is a side sewer serving the existing building. The City will proceed with the optional plan of replacing the sewer main through the new library property and installing a manhole where the existing bend in the existing main is located. SPU is working on permitting for this_ This part of the work will be required to be installed by the developer. The City will follow behind this work and re -line the portion of the main under the remaining buildings. B. Fire and Police. Police and Fire Prevention Staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development; subject to the condition that the Applicant provides Code required improvements and fees. A SEPA mitigation condition was adopted requiring the Applicant to pay a Fire Impact Fee, based on the new square footage of non-residential area. C. Drainage. The project is required to comply with the new City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. A conceptual drainage plan and report stamped by a PE was submitted with the formal application, and per the report the project is complying with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Since the project is exempt from flow control and water quality, the engineer is proposing to tightline the roof and footing drains to a new 8 -inch PVC storm pipe that will cross the Seattle pipeline to the north and tie into an existing catch basin and storm conveyance system. D. Parks/Open Space. City development standards do not require any set -asides or mitigation for parks and open space for libraries. The Applicant has consulted with the City of Renton Park's Department in order to redesign Gateway Park, along with input from the public, into a plaza that would function as an entry plaza for the proposed library. The plaza is approximately 1,$00 sq. ft. measuring 90' X 90'. In light of security concerns the Applicant opted for an open and urban design. The plaza would contain seating, trees, landscaping in planters, and sculptural furnishings. The design of the public plaza allows for ample sun exposure and is visibly linked to the existing public plaza located to the east. CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 E. Transportation. Access to the site is proposed via two existing curb cuts on Morris Avenue South and on Logan Avenue South. The vehicular traffic patterns would not be significantly affected by the proposed project. The drive aisle width and direction of two- way traffic flow would not be affected by the proposal. Staff have concluded that the proposed development is expected to maintain the safety and efficiency of pedestrian and vehicle circulation on and off the site and there is no evidence to the contrary. Based on the traffic generation analysis, the proposed final project is anticipated to generate approximately 146 additional daily trips. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, a SEPA mitigation measure requiring the Applicant to pay an appropriate Transportation Impact Fee was adopted. Street improvements along South 3rd Street are required to match the existing sidewalk and lighting design improvements to the east. Additionally, all wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton ordinances and standards. All new services shall be installed underground. F. Parkin . The parking regulations, RMC 4-4-080, require a specific number of off-street parking stalls be provided based on the number of employees that work at the facility, in this instance the proposed 15,000 sq. ft. library would be required to provide 60 parking spaces. The Applicant proposed to provide a total of 50 spaces. Therefore, the Applicant is requesting a parking modification to reduce the minimum number of stalls from 60 to 50 parking stalls. The Renton Transit Center is within one block of the site. Additionally, plentiful parking is provided in the vicinity of the site; 137 street parking stalls within a one block radius and 562 parking stalls within the City Center Parking Garage located one block from the project site. The proposed parking conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking stall dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls. G. Sidewalks. Sidewalks are provided from the street to the entries and around the building in order to provide pedestrian linkages. Public sidewalks adjacent to the project site would be widened and repaved. The planting strips along the right-of-way to the north are proposed to be removed resulting in a 10 -foot wide walkway. Along South 3rd Street the proposed building would be set back from the property line approximately 1 -foot 6 -inches, resulting in a walkway of approximately 12 feet in width. In addition, proposed pedestrian sidewalks and hardscape associated with the plaza would be concrete and differentiated by materials and texture. H. Bicycles. Per RMC 4-4-080(F)(11), the number of bicycle parking spaces shall be 10% of the number of required off-street parking spaces. Based on the proposal which requires CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION n 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 60 vehicle parking stalls, 6 bicycle parking stalls are required to be provided. The Applicant has proposed 10 bicycle parking stalls on site, within the plaza area, complying with the standards outline in RMC 4-4-080F. 5. Adverse IMpacts. There are no significant adverse impacts associated with the project. Few adverse impacts are anticipated since there are no critical areas on site, the proposal is a redevelopment of a fully developed parcel and adequate infrastructure serves the site as determined in Finding of Fact No. 4. The SEPA MDNS mitigation measures in the Environmental Report (Exhibit 6) are adopted as Conditions of Approval. Adoption of Ex. 6 encompasses both the Findings of Fact and the Conclusions of Law of Staff. All other adverse impacts discernible from the record are also fully mitigated. Impacts are more specifically addressed as follows: A. Archaeological Resources. According to the Staff report, Staff received comments from the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation; regarding the potential for an archaeological site in the area (Exhibit 9). A mitigation measure of the May 14, 2012 SEPA Determination of Non -Significance — Mitigated, will require the Applicant to submit a survey to the Current Planning Project Manager that conforms to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and work must be conducted under the on-site supervision of a state - approved archaeologist. B. Noise. It is anticipated that most of the noise impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The Applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Pian that provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise, control of dust, traffic controls, etc. In addition, the project would be required to comply with the City's noise ordinance regarding construction hours. C. Views. There are no large attractive natural features on or near the site for which visual accessibility needs to be maintained. The Applicant has proposed to limit the height of the proposed structure to 32 feet and 6 inches which mitigate view impacts from surrounding properties. The Applicant is also proposing the removal of the existing dense tree canopy within Gateway Park in order to improve site lines into the park. D. Li htin . The proposal includes the addition of three new streetlights and four existing pedestrian -height streetlights would be replaced with the City standard. The existing streetlight at the southwest corner of the project site would be removed. Additionally, downlights with shielding and cutoffs would be incorporated into the proposed canopies to minimize light impacts to adjoining properties. E. Natural Features and Landscaping. The site contains 28 trees of which all 28 trees are proposed for removal. RMC 4-4-130 requires that 5 percent of the trees on site be retained. Of the 28 trees, 1 tree is required to be retained at the 5 percent retention rate. CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 When the required number of protected trees cannot be retained, new trees, with a two- inch caliper or greater, shall be planted. The replacement rate shall be twelve caliper inches of new trees to replace each protected tree removed. The Applicant is proposing 26 -caliper inches of new trees (13 trees) to replace the protected tree. There is a total of 2,516 square feet of landscaping proposed on site. The landscaping softens the appearance of parking areas, defines and enhances open spaces, and generally enhances the appearance of the project. Landscaping is also proposed to conceal the service area from view along the parking easement. Landscaping has been thoughtfully incorporated into the site plan in order to screen loading and parking areas (Exhibit 3). As shown in Ex. 3, landscaping is provided in all areas not occupied by buildings, paving, or critical areas. There is no need to provide any additional landscaping to screen adjacent uses. F. Soils and Groundwater. The Applicant provided a geotechnical report, prepared by GeoEngineers, November 2, 2011 (Exhibit 10). The topography of the site is relatively flat, sloping downward from the eastern portion of the site. Following development, impervious surface coverage would be a 100% on the building site and approximately 50% on the park parcel to the east. The Applicant is proposing to excavate approximately 1,320 cubic yards on site in order to accommodate a depressed slab for the proposed access floor. In addition, geothermal bore holes would be drilled underneath the proposed structure producing drilling spoils that would be required to be hauled off site. Fill, in the amount of 1,030 cubic yards, would be imported to the site in order to fill void areas of removed footings from the existing building demolition. Groundwater was encountered at approximate depths ranging from 12-15 feet below existing grades in borings in the site vicinity. The report recommended that shallow foundations bearing on improved soil is the preferred foundation alternative. Lean concrete auger cast columns installed to an approximate depth of 20 to 30 feet below site grades on a variable grid pattern have been selected as the preferred ground improvement technique. Dewatering during construction is not anticipated except for deep utility trenches. The provided geotechnical report recommended measures to be implemented by the Applicant to mitigate the proposal's potential impact to soils and related conditions. A condition of approval will require all work performed to be consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by GeoEngineers, dated November 2, 2011. G. Suns. The Applicant did not submit a signage package for the proposed library. A condition of approval will require the Applicant to comply with the signage requirements outlined in RMC 4-4100 at the time of sign application. CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 8 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Conclusions of Law 1. Authority. Government offices and facilities are allowed in the Center Downtown (CD) district as a conditional use subject to Hearing Examiner review. RMC 4-8-080(G) classifies conditional use applications as Type III permits when Hearing Examiner review is required. RMC 4- 9-200(B)(2)(a) requires site plan review for all development in the CD zones. In the absence of the conditional use permit application, no Hearing Examiner review would be required for the site plan and it would be classified as a Type II permit by RMC 4-8-080(G). RMC 4-8-080(G) classifies modifications, deviations and alternatives of various code standards, such as the parking modification request in this proposal, as Type I permits, which are administratively approved by Staff with no required hearing. All three of the aforementioned permits have been consolidated. RMC 4-8- 080(C)(2) requires consolidated permits to each be processed under "the highest -number procedure". The conditional use has the highest numbered review procedures, so all three permits must be processed as Type III applications. As Type III applications, RMC 4-8-080(G) grants the Examiner with the authority to hold a hearing and issue a final decision on them, subject to closed record appeal to the City Council. 2, Zoning/Comprehensive Plan Designations. The subject property is zoned Center Downtown (CD), a commercial district. The comprehensive plan land use designation is Urban Center Downtown (UC- D). The subject property is also located in Design District `A'. 3. Review Criteria. Conditional use criteria are governed by RMC 4-9-030(D). Site plan review standards are governed by RMC 4-9-200(E)(3). Parking modifications are governed by RMC 4-4- 080(F)(10)(d). All applicable criteria are quoted below in italics and applied through corresponding conclusions of law. Conditional Use The Administrator or designee or the Hearing Examiner shall consider, as applicable, the following factors for all applications: RMC 4-9-030(0)(1): Consistency with Plans and Regulations. The proposed use shall he compatible with the general goals, objectives, policies and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plans, programs, maps or ordinances of the City of Renton. CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION we 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4. The proposal is consistent with Objective LU-QQ and Policy LU -201, LU -202, LU -204 and LU -205 as quoted at page 5 of the Staff Report because as designed and mitigated the project is designed to be part of a vibrant city core, provides for the redevelopment of vacant commercial space, will be appropriate in the scale of the buildings compared to the subject's vicinity and will encourage the evolution of downtown Renton into a regional commercial district by serving as a civic destination. The proposal is consistent with all applicable zoning and other development standards as outlined in Finding 14(a) -(c) of the Staff report, adopted and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. RMC 4-9-030(C)(2): Appropriate Location: The proposed location shall not result in the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location shall be suited for the proposed use. 5. There are no other libraries within the immediate vicinity of the library. Even if there were, it is hard to imagine how a community could suffer a "detrimental overconcentration" from an abundance of libraries. As discussed in Conclusion of Law No. 4 , the proposed location is suitable for the proposed use. Given these factors the criterion is met. RMC 4-9-030(C)(3): Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property_ 6. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5 there are no adverse impacts associated with the proposal, so it will not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. RMC 4-9-030(C)(4): Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. 7. The proposed use is surrounded by public and commercial uses and has been well designed to break up mass and scale to be compatible with surrounding development, as discussed in Finding of Fact No. 3. Improvements to Gateway Park and screening that are integrated into the project also reduce aesthetic impacts and increase compatibility. RMC 4-9-030(C)(5): Parking: Adequate parking is, or will be made, available. 8. As concluded below, the parking proposed by the Applicant qualifies for a parking modification and is thus considered compliant with applicable City standards, which defines adequate parking for the site. RMC 4-9-030(C)(6): Traffic: The use shall ensure safe movement for vehicles and pedestrians and shall mitigate potential effects on the surrounding area. CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 10 2 3 4 5 b 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 9. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 4(E), the project will not have a significant impact on the general traffic in the vicinity and provides for adequate and safe vehicle and pedestrian circulation. RMC 4-9-030(C)(7): Noise, Light and Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts from the proposed use shall be evaluated and mitigated. 10. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, noise and light impacts are adequately addressed and mitigated. Lighting will comply with City regulations which require lights to be directed inwards and prohibited light trespass. As to noise, the Applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan to minimize noise impacts during construction and the City's noise regulations, Chapter 8-7 RMC, sets the legislative standard for noise impacts and will adequately regulation noise when construction is completed. RMC 4-9-030(C)(8): Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings, paving, or critical areas. Additional landscaping may be required to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. 11. As determined in Finding of Fact 5(E), the criterion is met. Site Plan RMC 4-9-200(E)(3): Criteria: The Administrator or designee roust find a proposed project to be in compliance with the following: a. Compliance and Consistency: Conformance with plans, policies, regulations and approvals, including; L Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan, its elements, goals, objectives, and policies, especially those of the applicable land use designation; the Community Design Element; and any applicable adopted Neighborhood Plan; ii. Applicable land use regulations; iii. Relevant Planned Action Ordinance and Development Agreements; and iv. Design Regulations: Intent and guidelines of the design regulations located in RMC 4- 3-100. 12. As discussed in Conclusion of Law No. 4, as conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan, as well as development and design regulations. The proposal does not qualify as a Planned Action Ordinance, as outlined at Finding No. 14(d) of the Staff Report. CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(b): Off --Site Impacts: Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses, including: L Structures: Restricting overscale structures and overconcentration of development on a particular portion of the site; ii. Circulation: Providing desirable transitions and linkages between uses, streets, walkways and adjacent properties; iii. Loading and Storage Areas: Locating, designing and screening storage areas, utilities, rooftop equipment, loading areas, and refuse and recyclables to minimize views from surrounding properties; iv. Views: Recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features; v. Landscaping: Using landscaping to provide transitions between development and surrounding properties to reduce noise and glare, maintain privacy, and generally enhance the appearance of the project; and vr. Lighting: Designing andlor placing exterior lighting and glazing in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. 13. The library facility is necessarily concentrated on one portion of the site, however the scale and bulk of the building is compatible with the low rise urban structures that surround the site. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, lighting and view impacts are adequately mitigated and landscaping is effectively used to protect adjoining properties from noise and glare and to maintain privacy and enhance the appearance of the project. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 3, the project provides screening of refuse areas to minimize views from surrounding properties. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the proposal does not create any adverse light impacts. The criterion is met. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(c): On Site Impacts: Mitigation of impacts to the .site, including. L Structure Placement. Provisions for privacy and noise reduction by building placement, spacing and orientation; ii. Structure Scaler Consideration of the scale of proposed structures in relation to natural characteristics, views and vistas, site amenities, sunlight, prevailing winds, and pedestrian and vehicle needs; CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 iii. Natural Features: Protection of the natural landscape by retaining existing vegetation and soils, using topography to reduce undue cutting and filling, and limiting impervious surfaces; and iv. Landscaping: Use of landscaping to soften the appearance of parking areas, to provide shade and privacy where needed, to define and enhance open spaces, and generally to enhance the appearance of the project. Landscaping also includes the design and protection of planting areas so that they are less susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements. 14. The proposal is largely surrounded by public and commercial uses and its placement, structure and orientation would have not discernible impact on privacy or noise. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 3 and 5, the proposal is designed to be compatible in scale and mass to surrounding uses and will not significantly adversely affect surrounding uses in any way. There is nothing in the record to reasonably suggest that the scale of the project is incompatible with sunlight, prevailing winds or natural characteristics. As to natural features, there are no critical areas on-site. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 5, the proposal protects trees as required by City standards and is mitigated to prevent adverse impacts to soil and groundwater quality. The site is fully landscaped as determined in Finding of Fact No. 5. The criterion is met. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(d): Access and Circulation: Safe and efficient access and circulation for all users, including, 4 Location and Consolidation: Providing access paints on side streets or frontage streets rather than directly onto arterial streets and consolidation of ingress and egress points on the site and, when feasible, with adjacent properties; ii. Internal Circulation: Promoting safety and efficiency of the internal circulation system, including the location, design and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian access points, drives, parking, turnarounds, walkways, bikeways, and emergency access ways; iii, Loading and Delivery: Separating loading and delivery areas from parking and pedestrian areas; iv. Transit and Bicycles: Providing transit, carpools and bicycle facilities and access; and v. Pedestrians: Providing safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. 15. The proposal provides for adequate access, circulation and other transportation facilities as required by the criterion above for the reasons identified in Finding of Fact No. 4(E) through (H). CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(e): Open Space: Incorporating open spaces to serve as distinctive project focal points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users of the site. 16. The criterion is met. As discussed in Finding of Fact No. 4(D), the Applicant has proposed to redesign Gateway Park into a plaza that would function as an entry plaza for the proposed library. The plaza is approximately 1,800 sq. ft. measuring 90' X 90'. The plaza would contain seating, trees, landscaping in planters, and sculptural furnishings. The design of the public plaza allows for ample sun exposure and is visibly linked to the existing public plaza located to the east. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(f): Views and Public Access: When possible, providing view corridors to shorelines and Mi. Rainier, and incorporating public access to shorelines. 17. There are no view corridors to shorelines or Mt. Rainier affected by the proposal. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(g): Natural Systems: Arranging project elements to protect existing natural systems where applicable. 18. There are no natural systems at the site or that would be affected by the proposal. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(h): Services and Infrastructure: Making available public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use. 19. The project is served by adequate services and facilities as determined in Finding of Fact No. 4. RMC 4-9-200(E)(3)(i): Phasing: Including a detailed sequencing plan with development phases and estimated time frames, , for phased projects. 20. The project is not phased. Parking Modification RMC 4-4-080(F)(10)(d): Modification: The Department of Community and Economic Development may authorize a modification from either the minimum or maximum parking requirements for a spec fac development should conditions warrant as described in RMC 4-9-25QD2. When seeking a modification from the minimum or maximum parking requirements, the developer or building occupant shall provide the Department of Community and Economic Development with written justification for the proposed modification_ CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RMC 4-9-250(D)(2): Decision Criteria: Whenever there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this Title, the Department Administrator may grant modifications for individual cases provided he/she shall first find that a specific reason makes the strict letter of this Code impractical, that the intent and purpose of the governing land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan is met and that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Code, and that such modification: a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives; b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based upon sound engineering judgment; c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; d. Conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code; e. Can be shown to be justified and required.for the use and situation intended; and f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity. 22. As discussed in Finding of Fact 4(F), the Applicant is requesting a parking modification to reduce the minimum number of stalls from 60 to 54 parking stalls. The record indicates there is ample parking in the general vicinity of the proposed project and that the needs of the library can be adequately served with the reduced parking provided. The requested modification conforms to the intent and purpose of the parking regulations by providing sufficient on-site parking for the amount necessary for the new Renton Downtown Library while providing the minimum adjustment necessary to meet the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element, providing for safety and function, and providing no injury or adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity. Furthermore, the proposed parking conforms to the minimum requirements for drive aisle and parking stall dimensions and the provision of ADA accessible parking stalls. This criterion is satisfied and the requested parking waiver granted. DECISION As conditioned below, the site plan, conditional use permit and parking modification are approved. The conditions recommended in Section J of the Staff Report shall apply to the site plan and conditional use approval with the following added conditions: CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The Applicant shall submit a comprehensive signage package which complies with the standards of Design District `A' for review and approval by the Current Planning Manager prior to sign permit approval. 2. All work performed must be consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by GeoEngineers, dated November 2, 2011. DATED this 5`h day of July, 2012. lsl Phil Olbrechis (Signed original in official file) Phil A. Olbrechts City of Renton Hearing Examiner Appeal Right and Valuation Notices RMC 4-8-110(E)(9) provides that the final decision of the Hearing Examiner is subject to appeal to the Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-110(E)(9) requires appeals of the Hearing Examiner's decision to be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Hearing Examiner's decision. A request for reconsideration to the hearing e examiner may also be filed within this 14 day appeal period as identified in RMC 4-8-110(E)(8) and RMC 4-8-100(G)(4). A new fourteen (14) day appeal period shall commence upon the issuance of the reconsideration. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall — 7t' floor, (425) 430-6510. Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. CONDITIONAL USE, SITE PLAN, & PARKING MODIFICATION 16 Renton Downtown Library (LUA4 2-422) Public Hearing Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner June 19, 2012 I' �cityof L 1. r ��rJTA Cnumunirv�arM F nnmklhvdered Project Description .l Y N —�''� =ti; Site Plan Review Analysis RENTOiJ 06/19/2012 }_and Use Permits Requir -,' Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review Design Review Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit approval Parking Modification from RMC4-4- 080 Environmental'SEPA' Review � 1 RENTOK �> > 4 R P_ N czar e+I.-'r...- +5 .. ., !,.:-;r 1 Brief Description The site is by anSPV = 1 � '^ easement, Logan Ave 5, 5 3r4 St, •"'-' -j and a commercial property. fir' 4A.:� f _'- . -. The 055 acre site is located ^t }�";;� Y: Z'. .. within the UC -0 Comprehensive ` Plan designation and the CD l" •! ....- .�� zoning classification, iC,' '.r `- "- 'w-.�. :y , --{�' The site is also located within b '—�Ili isThe Design District W. existing retail structure, Formerly occupied by Big 5, is t proposed for demolition along with the small existing parking lot onsite, }_and Use Permits Requir -,' Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review Design Review Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit approval Parking Modification from RMC4-4- 080 Environmental'SEPA' Review � 1 RENTOK �> > 4 R P_ N czar e+I.-'r...- +5 .. ., !,.:-;r 1 4 Site Plan Review Analysis Conditional Use Permit Analysi,- Conditi---- -- Permit An. -!,Y -i, JEP to aW. 4a �dj 7: W 06/19/2012 .in r ilysis x .. > A .. ......> Conditional Use P -.wrmit Analysis R.F N T o.N Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Renton Downtown Library subject to three conditions of approval. .4.4 R K ✓' j a o :y y `� o � 2 .- C %. :i L E•��' u 7- �,_O�i: � � v fl.v p4n -e•a y- o ti 77 :.J Cr � � =G�r- O`CaxC= s v l, c" > c �� fl moo= r �� - cis 7 1� `� - p r m u F v — Gz�2. r :i �' ,.. 3 , _ 1 -,Z-;y . V :i _ '' G «� i i OXr_�0T!,p "'^ �yi��s .`'j G� viCr ``,!.'�'Q, •^•-^' n��:y ..�'v c`s .n-. o \ter*rrrrr�r�tlttti� ry P. `-s �rra�+l+NGr� ''rr�' Y% /// \�, I 5 iZ 4 r !1. �UO�p t Q �r�Os 111110 i O fy O un f u > 4-0 Z v � p4 O OCU cn ni a C t.-cz� CL LR �p� 71 Lr K4. CIA O _ 3 C O y C C U f0. M --i 7j cz ;•,O U O C cC3 GA C cJ ✓, cq Lj ��Q ^� bAp4 U C'��F" CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: June 13, 2012 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Renton Downtown Library LUA (file) Number: LUA-12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD Cross -References: AKA's: Project Manager: Rocale Timmons Acceptance Date: April 19, 2012 Applicant: Greg Smith King County Library System (KCLS) Owner: City of Renton Contact: Maaike Post, Miller Hull Partnership PID Number: 5696000005; 7841800205; 7841800195 ERC Approval Date: May 14, 2012 ERC Appeal Date: June 1, 2012 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: June 19, 2012 Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number; Project Description: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library on a three parcel site totaling 24,070 square feet located in the Center Downtown (CD) zone and within Design District'A'. Location: 510 S 3rd Street Comments: r 4 3 CITY CIF,RENTOiV. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTYZ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING,; DIVISION ..... _ AFFIDAVIT- OFSERVICEBY MAILING Phillip D. LeTourneau I POR r (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON } SS i •AIS' COUNTY OF KING ) �10� I certi that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker f1' ry Y signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: i3 Qoj-2 -- i ,A Notary Public i and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): �� _ _ 6 co --'k -[ j My appointment expires: Renton Downtown Library LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD Denis Law - Ma or City 07, � ti C � va 7 ;1 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E."Chip"Vincent, Interim Administrator June 13, 2012 Maaike Post Miller Hull Partnership 71 Columbia Street, 6th Floor Seattle, WA 98104-1031 SUBJECT: Renton Downtown Library LUA12-022, ECF, CU -H, SA -H, MOD Dear Mr. Post: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period ended: June 1, 2012 for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated for the above -referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination therefore, this decision is final. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures outlined in the Report and Decision dated May 14, 2012. Also, a Hearing Examiner Public Hearing has been scheduled for June 19, 2012, where additional conditions may be issued. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present. Enclosed is a copy of the Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner for your review. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Ro le Timmons Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Greg Smith - KCLS / Applicant Ray & Julie Johnson, Phillip D. LeTourneau, Gretchen Kaehler / Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98057 rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D city of AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING June 19, 2012 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 1:00 PM, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: Renton Downtown Library PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD LOCATION: 510 S 3rd Street. DESCRIPTION: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library on a three parcel site totaling 24,070 square feet located in the Center Downtown (CD) zone and within Design District'A'. HEX Agenda 6-19-12.doc OS %OUT MMA3M NVId 31iS `r 540W VM'NO-LNab 1133b1S a8c Hinos m9 All"811 NO1N3M 'S anti siaaow 'S'3ntl SA13HIIWS m 0 F vi r 101 7w 'S "3ntl HVOQ'1 'S anti siaaow 'S'3ntl SA13HIIWS m 0 F vi r 101 7w Sg�w€ �� k �IA3S %004'8 M31A32! fJti3d 3115 z cn d 'j:- i� " 9096 VM -NOIN3H 133i -1S Oi3E Hints 045 to r, AN"811 NOIN3N W w z Z i .. � .} N' li - $iViv c N[�IwFW ¢d fr Ciry i .. � .} N' - a� H s nrH - — -- — -- — -- — -- — 4-1 's 9 wu I i R Ej I I I L I I <1 I 1 I A il 1 i :iE x ui CIS %006TM31AM NV-ld 3115 59096VM'No1N38 13381S 08Z H-Lnos u5 Ab"911 NOINM I r 0 LU -1 0 Z- LL x u2 H s nrH - — -- — -- — -- — -- — 4-1 's 9 wu I i R Ej I I I L I I <1 I 1 I A il 1 i :iE x ui I r --------------------- U 0 I j INC; —;A Z -X J1.5 LL I-16 ZI M'� 1 al 01 0, II II 11 ri ujlk cc UZ. aS %0U T � 3[A9a NVId alis 1k�E��uE _�a Nod; s 55086 bM 'NOINBd 1 -1338 -LS ObE H-LnOS 04S AWHEIII NOIN3N 3 z 0 g F- 1= a Eli HTty. 0 it z O �I BOO N a d W JI 3 in Q ❑'€� Z uj �OC:E O ++ O_ `o C C � 'Q Y, (IS %004'8 M31A�I23 NV -1d 3115 A' 6 '�, � g 530136 VM'NOIN2d JAP2 L C38Z HinOS Ola �f` j ! � v j L A�IVU911 NOINBN _ ��' al °° Q s W .0 IM C _- w, m '�=ill I l ME tlo fie Y, Denis Law /.,C1 � icy, Mayor ] i U��o� Department of Community and Economic Development May 16, 2012 Alex Pietsch, Administrator Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL fSEPA) DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following. project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 14, 2012: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJ ECT'NAM E: Renton Downtown Library PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD LOCATION: 510 S 3ra Street (Parcel #'s: 5696000005, 7841800205, 7841800195) DESCRIPTION: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 1, 2012, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Ro le Timmons Associate Planner EXHIBIT 6 Enclosure Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Washington State Departme cology Page 2 of 2 May 16, 2012 cc; King County Wastewater Treatment Division Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Larry Fisher, WDFW Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Duwamish Tribal Office Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNI I o City of i AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTj� DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD APPLICANT: King County Library System - Greg Smith PROJECT NAME: Renton Downtown Library DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 510 S 3rd Street (Parcel Ws: 5696000005, 7841800205, 7841800195) LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by GeoEngineers, dated November 2, 2011. 2. The applicant shall comply with all of the recommendations included within the "Pre -Demolition Hazardous Materials Survey", prepared by Landau Associates, dated June 6, 2011 during demolition activities. 3. A survey shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager that conforms to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the on-site supervision of a state -approved archaeologist prior to construction permit approval. 4. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of Building Permit application. 5. The applicant shall pay a Fire Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of Building Permit Application. ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 19th day of April, 2012, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, Notice of Application, Site Plan, Environmental Checklist documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Maaike Post, Miller Hull Partnership Contact Peter Renner - City of Renton Owner Greg Smith, KCLS Applicant 300' Surrounding Property Owners See attached (Signature of Sender):I.� �`N �► {� r STATE OF WASHINGTON 00 y 1 Ss s '• i COUNTY OF KING ) R' 14 s if"� � y13 I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker ���irr1,�g��`*�*. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fort LMp,a purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:f�,,�,�. lqaorz Notary Pudc in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print):_ My appointment expires: (,s-� '2��O Project Name: Renton Downtown Library Project Number: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD EXHIBIT 7 template - affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology ** WDFW - Larry Fisher* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 — 172"d Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS -240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 U5 Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Sox 48343 PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. ** Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template - affidavit of service by mailing 784180002502 784180006503 N& C INVESTMENT LLC COOLEY D B J LLC 7432 SE 27TH ST PO BOX 272 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 RENTON WA 98057 000720018803 784180015504 SEATTLE CITY OF SPU-WTR FAIRWAY FUND IV LLC 700 STH AVE STE 4900 -RPS 6650 SW REDWOOD LN #290 PO BOX 34018 PORTLAND OR 97224 SEATTLE WA 98124 569600005502 784080000507 RENTON CITY OF THARP JOHN M 1055 S GRADY WAY 232 WELLS AVE N RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98057 784180001504 784180016502 FAKHARZADEH M HADI SALVATION ARMY PO BOX 78404 PO BOX 9219 SEATTLE WA 98178 SEATTLE WA 98109 569600006500 569600000503 RENTON CITY OF RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY WAY 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 783930023008 784080011504 GOOD PARTNERSHIP C/O BREWER CRAIG MD SENS HOUNG & GENE 315 MORRRIS AVE S PO BOX 1276 RENTON WA 98057 RENTON WA 98056 783930024006 569600012003 GOOD PARTNERSHIP NW LLC RENTON CITY OF 7259 S SUNNYCREST RD 1055 S GRADY WAY SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98055 783930034005 783980006002 BURNETT AVENUE LAND LLC HOLLAND DANIEL J+ALMA C 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY SUITE 40 320 MORRIS AVE S LOGAN UT 84321 RENTON WA 98055 784180018300 ROXY LLC PO BOX 1754 RENTON WA 98057 784180000506 SOUTH 2ND STREET L 2291 NE 60TH ST SEATTLE WA 98115 783930025003 KNOX CHARLES E PO BOX 493 BELLEVUE WA 98009 784180020504 RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY RENTON WA 98057 784080002008 SOUTH THIRD ST ASSC 413 S THIRD ST RENTON WA 98055 783980001607 RENTON CIVIC THEATRE P 0 BOX 1556 RENTON WA 98057 784180013509 FIRST CH OF CHRIST SCIENT 220 WHITWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 784080012007 CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SEAT 710 9TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98104 783930034500 BURNETT AVENUE LAND LLC 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY SUITE 41 LOGAN UT 84321 783980003009 FREEMAN STEPHEN 812 S TRENTON ST SEATTLE WA 98108 784180019506 L C RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY RENTON WA 98057 784080001000 569600008001 784180018508 SOUTH THIRD STREET ASSOC RENTON CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOLORES A 413 S THIRD ST 1055 S GRADY WAY 4650 SOMERSET AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98006 783980014006 783930027009 HANSEN DOUGLAS NORWOOD ERIK 311 SMITHERS AVE S 316 SMITHERS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 783980013503 783980005004 TURNER SYBIL A GRIFFITH GREGORY M 315 SMITHERS AVE S 310 MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA 98057 RENTON WA 98055 783930026001 569600001006 OHNEMUS PAUL D RENAISSANCE URBAN LIVING 312 B SMITHERS C/O JACOB MARBLE RENTON WA 98055 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY #400 LOGAN UT 84321 784180018003 569600007003 SALVATION ARMY THE RENTON CITY OF NORTHWEST DIVISION 1055 S GRADY WAY PO BOX 9219 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98109 783980001508 783980000500 KKM ENTERPRISES LLC WONG KAI ET AL C/O KING LEE C/O KING LEE PO BOX 80563 PO BOX 80563 SEATTLE WA 98108 SEATTLE WA 98108 783980013008 JOHNSON RAY N & JULIE A 18808 SE 170TH ST RENTON WA 98058 569600003002 N & C INVESTMENT LLC 7432 SE 27TH ST MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 569600005007 RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 783980005509 MCLAUGHLIN RYAN & SHANNON 24503 146TH PL SE ISSAQUAH WA 98042 783980003504 RENTON CIVIC THEATRE P 0 BOX 1556 RENTON WA 98057 0 O N 0 Clq a M J OD _ I I � i� :;Apr -- W �j kw-k'-F'U�77' STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1063 S. Capital Way, Suite 706 • Olympia, Washington 98501 Mailing address: PO Sox 48343 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 (360) 586-3065 • Fax Number (360) 586-3067 • Website: www.dahp.wa.gov May 2, 2012 Ms. Rocale Timmons Associate Planner City of Renton, CED 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98507 In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 050212 -16 -KI Property: LUA 12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD Renton Downtown Library Re: Archaeology - Survey Requested, Possible Professional archaeological monitoring requested Dear Ms. Timmons: We have reviewed the materials forwarded to our office for the proposed project referenced above. The project area has a high probability for containing archaeological resources_ It is near the historic confluence of the Duwamish River and Black River and is approximately 600 feet from a previously recorded archaeological site. Please be aware that archaeological sites are protected from knowing disturbance on both public and private lands in Washington States. Both RCW 27.44 and RCW 27.53.060 require that a person obtain a permit from our Department before excavating, removing, or altering Native American human remains or archaeological resources in Washington_ Failure to obtain a permit is punishable by civil fines and other penalties under RCW 27.53.095, and by criminal prosecution under RCW 27.53.090. Chapter 27.53.095 RCW allows the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation to issue civil penalties for the violation of this statute in an amount up to five thousand dollars, in addition to site restoration costs and investigative costs. Also, these remedies do not prevent concerned tribes from undertaking civil action in state or federal court, or law enforcement agencies from undertaking criminal investigation or prosecution. Chapter 27.44.OS0 RCW allows the affected Indian Tribe to undertake civil action apart from any criminal prosecution if burials are disturbed. The scale of the proposed ground disturbing actions would destroy any archaeological resources present_ Identifications during construction is not a recommended detection method because inadvertent discoveries often result in costly construction delays and damage to, the resource. Therefore, we request a professional archaeological survey of the project area be conducted prior to ground disturbing activities. The report should be submitted to DABP and the interested Tribes for review prior to ground disturbance. Based on the results of the survey professional archaeological monitoring, additional archaeological work and/or a permit from DAHP may be required. EXHIBIT 9 If any federal funds or permits are involved Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, and its implementing regulations, 36CFR800, must be followed. This is a separate process from SEPA and requires formal government -to -goverment consultation Adth the affected Tribes and this agency. Vire would appreciate receiving any correspondence or comments from concerned tribes or other parties concerning cultural resource issues that you receive. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project and we look forward to receiving the survey report. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360) 586-3088 or Gretchen.Kaehler@dahp.wa.gov. Sincerely, Gretchen Kaehler Assistant State Archaeologist (360) 586-3088 gxetchen.kaehler(a)dahp. u,a-gov ce_ Laura Murphy, Archaeologist, Muckleshoot Tribe Cecile Hansen, Chair, Duwamish Tribe Phil LeTourneau, Archaeologist, King County 2 Pia`" C k 1A ENGINEERING REPORT Technical Information Report Renton Downtown Library _t Mairh 27th, 2012 eJ PREPARED FOR: City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-6400 PREPARED THROUGH: The Miller Hull ,Partnership, LLP 71 Columbia Street, Sixth Floor Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 682.6837 Contact: Ruth Baleiko PREPARED BY: COUG HLI NPORTERLUNDEEN 413 Pine Street, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98101 P: 206/343 -WO Contact Bart Balko, P.E. EXHIBIT 10 Denis Law City of Y o Mayor t ! 1 '*7 Department of Community and Economic Development May 16, 2012 Alex Pietsch, Administrator Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on May 14, 2012: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: Renton Downtown Library PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD LOCATION: 510 S 3rd Street (Parcel #'s: 5696000005, 7841800205, 7841800195) DESCRIPTION: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 1, 2012, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Ro le Timmons Associate Planner Enclosure Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Washington State Department of Ecology Page 2 of 2 May 16, 2012 cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Ramin Paxooki, WSDOT, NW Region Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Larry Fisher, WDFW Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Duwamish Tribal Office Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY C.1lV OI AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD APPLICANT: King County Library System - Greg Smith PROJECT NAME: Renton Downtown Library DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 510 S 3rd Street (Parcel #'s: 5696000005, 7841800205, 7841800195) LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by GeoEngineers, dated November 2, 2011. 2. The applicant shall comply with all of the recommendations included within the "Pre -Demolition Hazardous Materials Survey", prepared by Landau Associates, dated June 6, 2011 during demolition activities. 3. A survey shall be submitted to the Current Planning Project Manager that conforms to the requirements and standards of the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and must be conducted under the on-site supervision of a state -approved archaeologist prior to construction permit approval. 4. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of Building Permit application. S. The applicant shall pay a Fire Impact fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of payment. The fee shall be payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of Building Permit Application. ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 16th day of May, 2012, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Greg Smith, KCLS Applicant Maaike Post Contact Ray & Julie Johnson Party of Record Phillip D. LeTourneau Party of Record Gretchen Kaehler Party of Record (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING SS )6 'UA"e two I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker y AlW 1 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for mentioned in the instrument. Dated:c�1Z s and purposes Notary Publi in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): rc,,j2l My appointment expires: . X91 api3 Project Name: Renton Downtown Library Project Number: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD template - affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology ** WDFW - Larry Fisher* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attm Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 Issaquah, WA 98027 39015— 172"d Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS -240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue 5E PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box 48343 PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 OakesdaIe Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev, Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template - affidavit of service by mailing ' �1ty Of OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS -M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME. Renton Downtown Library PROJECT NUMBER: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD LOCATION: 510 S 3rd Street (Parcel Vs: 5696000005, 7841800205, 7841800195) DESCRIPTION: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 square feet of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property. The site is also located within Design District W. There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by Big 5, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site which is proposed for demolition/removal as part of the proposal. Additionally, Gateway Park Is located on the eastern portion of the site which would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library. The proposed restriping of the existing parking area, to the north within a City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement, would create two additional parking spaces along with the addition of 6 new stalls, resulting In a total of 50 onsite parking stalls. The applicant is requesting a parking modification In order to decrease the minimum number of parking spaces required onsite from 60 to 50 stalls. Access to the site is proposed via two curb cuts; one along Morris Ave 5 through to Logan Ave S. There are no critical areas located on site. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC} HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 1, 2912. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.6. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 19, 2012 AT 1:00 PM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT, CONDITIONAL USE, AND PARKING MODIFICATION. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. Denis Law Mayor r May 16, 2012. Maaike Post Miller Hull Partnership 71 Columbia Street, 6th -Floor Seattle, WA 98104-1031 ow—city Of E � Department ofCommunity and Economic Development C.E "Chip"Vincent, Interim Administrator SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD (SEPA) DETERMINATION Renton Downtown Library, LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD Dear Mr. Post: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated with Mitigation` Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on June 19, 2012 at 1:00 p.m. to consider the Site Plan Development, Conditional Use, and Parking Modification. The applicant or representatives) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff recommendation will be mailed to you prior to the hearing and if the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 1, 2012, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Roc a Timmons Associate Planner Enclosure cc., King County library System - Greg Smith / owner(s) Ray & Julie Johnson, Phillip D. LeTourneau, Gretchen Kaehler / Party(ies) of Record Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 - rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D City of , AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD APPLICANT: King County Library System - Greg Smith PROJECT NAME: Renton Downtown Library DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 510 S 3rd Street (Parcel Ws: 5696000005, 7841800205, 7841800195) LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. RMC 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi -family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 3 Watf,r. The utility system development fee for water is owed if the size of the existing water meter is increased. The proposed site plan shows a new 1-% inch domestic water meter. The system development fee for water, based on the site plan with a credit for the existing meter, will be $5,590.00. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. A backflow device is required to be installed downstream of the domestic water meter. It has been shown on the site plan. 3. Applicant is required to install a separate fire line for the new fire sprinkler system. A double detector check valve assembly will be required to be installed for the fire sprinkler system. The assembly shall be installed inside a vault outside the building, or inside the building in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. The vault and the backflow device have been shown on the site plan. 4. A utility system development fee for the new fire line is also required. The fee is based on the size of the fire service line. The fee for the 4 -inch fire line shown on the plan is $7,288.00. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 5. The preliminary fire flow requirement per the Fire Marshal's office is 2,250 gpm. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm each. One primary hydrant is required within 150 feet from the building and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the building. One new hydrant is required and is shown on the plan. Final location will require approval by the Fire Department to meet the city standards. Any existing hydrants counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting, if not already in place and subject to verification by the Fire Department. Sewer 1. A utility system development fee for sewer is owed if the size of the existing water meter is increased. The proposed site plan shows a new 1-%z inch domestic water meter. The system development sewer fee based on the site plan with credit for the existing meter will be $3,977.00. The system development fee is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. The City will proceed with the optional plan of replacing the main through the new library property and installing a manhole where the existing bend in the existing main is located. SPU is working on permitting for this. This part of the work will be required to be installed by the developer. The City will follow behind this work and re -line the portion of the main under the remaining buildings. Surface Water: 1. Surface Water System Development fees of $.405 per square foot of new impervious surface will apply but not less than $1,012. The Surface Water SDC fee is payable prior to issue of the construction permit. Transportation: 1. Street improvements along S. 3rd Street shall match the existing sidewalk and lighting design improvements to the east. 2. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton ordinances and standards. All new services shall be installed underground. 3. Pedestrian lighting is required. ERC Advisory Notes Page 2 of 3 Fire: 1. Both an approved fire alarm and fire sprinkler system is required throughout the building. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire department for review and permitting. Fire alarm system shall be fully addressable and full detection is required. A direct outside door is required to the fire sprinkler riser control room. 2. An annual place of assembly permit is required for occupancies exceeding 50 persons. An automated external defibrillator (AED) is required if the occupancy load exceeds 300 persons. 3. Fire department apparatus access is adequate. 4. An electronic site plan is required prior to occupancy for pre -fire planning purposes. General : All construction utility permits for utilities, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Any proposed rockeries or retaining walls greater than four feet (4') in height will require a separate building permit and special inspection. 3. Separate permits and fees for water meters, side sewers, and backflow devices are required. 4. A cut and cap permit to abandon the existing water meter and side sewer will be required as part of the demo permit. ERC Advisory Notes Page 3 of 3 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D City of AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (elito ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS -M) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD APPLICANT: King County Library System - Greg Smith PROJECT NAME: Renton Downtown Library DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 510S3 rd Street (Parcel #'s: 5696000005, 7841800205, 7841800195 LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 1, 2012. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: nA Gregg Zim rm Administrator Public Works Department Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department May 18, 2012 May 14, 2012 Date tki (F(Stz, Date Mar Peterson, Xdministrator Date Fire & Emergency Services \J -5/ L I Z— C� C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Interim Date Administrator/Planning Director Department of Community & Economic Development Date tki (F(Stz, Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA TO: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator Mark Peterson, Fire & Emergency Services Administrator Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator FROM: Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager MEETING DATE: Monday, May 14, 2012 TIME: 3:00 p.m. LOCATION: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Renton Downtown Library (Timmons) LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD Location: 510 S 3 Street. Description: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. cc: D. Law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CED Director R. Perteet, Deputy PW Administrator - Transportation C. Vincent, CED Planning Director N. Watts, Development Services Director L. Warren, City Attorney.® Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal® J. Medzegian, Council r I RkR... iw. _ 92 93 455 L 1456i459 1 51. 1 B2 B::3 B6 B 28T24N R4E 25 T24N R4E.p T24N ASE i uE�mxau -i •' LL �9 T24N R5 26 T24N A5E: 27.T24N R5E26 T24N RSE 456W sr 8 94W —— 458 460 464 C DC7 35 F24N R4E 36 T24N WE 31 T24N R5E 35 T24N R5E — W 8 3Q9 307 — 1�7 �[ �� � 8 0 _ X801 D3 4 _D- �' III II i y , \Ji _ N �i4E T23�TR�8 1 `' 6 T23N RSE T2 N-0159 4 T23N R5Ei , ` 3 T23N R5E 2 T23N R5E -805 }' 4 L I + = E�f `fit` ,, } 1.T MA4E 12 T23N.R4E �G f l._,, i.:. 4 �T-.J , 1 II -�. T28N R5E 9 R5E 9723N R5E, f 10 T23N RSEr— Ei �1 N R5E 1 32 7_ X26 r — 327 r 370 g 10 _ _ 48 I_ y- r7l ci 4 T23NFWD � T2,-& 4f { 18 57 i2 R5E 16 T23N R5E':' 1 .T23N R5E L':: 14 T23N 1 .335 _ 6 33 I 371 815.E -81 B = —. — T23N R$E 24 _23t R4E T23NR5E _22 T23 R5E--20 T23N . 23 T23N 2 I- 34 _ T 601 6012 82844 821 — — go 7. 1 H6'..'7 T23N R4E 2 I23t{1 R4E I O T23N R5EY -- 29 T23N RSE 28 723N_ R5E T23NF15E i ,i 26 T23N f15E '_; 25 5 �� 603 —604 I 605 4 825 826 8 f 2 I 4- 3_ 36 T23N Ii4E `` 31 T23 R5E -- 32-`23N R5E = 33 T23N R a4 T23N R5E 35 T23N 1`15E 36 —POT _ 608 609 _ '�'r 61'0 _.632 833 J 7 2 J6_ j N R4E 1 T22Nfi4E 6 T22 R5E' .5 T2 R. v 4 T22N R5E 3 T22N R5E 2 T22N R5E 1 T2 RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE CENTERS INDUSTRIAL (RC) Resource Conservation (CV) (CV) Center Village C [IL) Industrial -Light ETR -T] (R-1) Residential 1 du/ac uc-vi (UC -Ni) Urban Center - North 1 rH [IM) Industrial - Medium -e (R-4) Residential 4 du/ac rr—Nr (UC -N2) Urban Center - North 2 r (IH) Industrial -Heavy R -s (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac cD (CD) Center Downtown -RjdH (RMH) Residential Manufactured Homes R -_o (R-10) Residential 10 du/ac COMMERCIAL a_,a (R-14)Residential 14 du/ac -- Renton City Liinita Pw-r (RM -F) Residential Multi -Family coR (COR) Commercial/Office/Residential -_-- AajE.—I City is:nits pM-r (RM -T) Residential Multi -Family Traditional cA (CA) Commercial Arterial RN -a (RM -U) Residential Multi -Family Urban Center rcii (CO) Commercial office KRULL PAGE cN (CN) Commercial Neighborhood PAGE# INDEX ano.r- TMs mai ,s roe e,s�ia�a�raoses o SECTffOWN/RANGE t g,aI 0 K. '� ren j I , it" k., �. r� iFf y ' 0 CU � c I a N •e" q. iJ —,# 1 7 - O o Z z L- m x W C S .� Z m� w 52 cErn � E E o O C O LL 6 w E c w c E c m c u m Eoa o � (D� H a O 0 u r Q N � T v a`r c � o U LE C aw � N D F y LL O co Z - i , it" l iFf y ' f s � i N' #1 O o Z z L- m x W C S .� Z m� w 52 cErn � E E o O C O LL 6 w E c w c E c m c u m Eoa o � (D� H a O 0 u r Q N � T v a`r c � o U LE C aw � N D F y LL O co Z o� z W iz,E 12�6" ssa Ao GS %00L V M3lA3M NVId 3115 C), 59086 VM'NO-LNB'd I 133liLS C8C H-Lnos ois AU"91-1 NOIN3N 'S -JAV SMOW z CY) -zz 'S -JAV SMOW 'S -RAW smgHWINS z CL UJ 'S -RAW smgHWINS ° s ` Z02! LE'2 /' s_US %OU V M31ABN Ntfld 3115 j 'I - j OZN j 0O ❑ N SS026 b7N NO1NMI 133211S Oa£ H-LnOS OLS x_ m °: i '', 9 °° W Q ANVII811 N41N3 1 � LU _ IZ a J! +r =ICC of g -Ali 1 ZWz"LZ'ELeiNOap �S NQS %OUT M3IA3M Mnd 3115 C4 i 99a96IIM'NO-LN3b im s OJE Hunts NsLU %, a = `; A?�VdGI-I N41N32i r m -jQ I n� C 0 .L 9L :C l P GL• Q} � � � gle wlo -obi Qr D �, iie ffio T�D:N i.b= CP 1J/ i s * 1 OI illi C CL LZ g+ A I - J.. lm: pg _ v '] i 5H _J W _ 9 a z ca'.1 -Oil CI Q '2 Z' 0;, J• �W �o W, � I HE LUIV PREPARED FOR: City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-6400 PREPARED THROUGH* The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP 71 Columbia Street, Sixth Floor Seattle, VITA 98104 Phone: (206) 682.6837 Contact: Ruth Baleiko PREPARED BY: COUGHLINPORTERLUNDEEN 413 Pine Street, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98101 P: 206/343-0460 Contact Bart Balko, P.E. EXHIBIT 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1063 S. Capitol Way, Suite 106 • Olympia, Washington 98509 Mailing address: PO Sox 48343 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 (360) 586-3065 • Fax Number (360) 586-3067 • Website: www.dahp.wa.gov May 2, 2012 Ms. Rocale Timmons Associate Planner City of Renton, CED 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98507 In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 050212 -16 -KI Property: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD Renton Downtown Library Re: Archaeology - Survey Requested, Possible Professional archaeological monitoring requested Dear Ms. Timmons: We have reviewed the materials forwarded to our office for the proposed project referenced above. The project area has a high probability for containing archaeological resources. It is near the historic confluence of the Duwamish River and Black River and is approximately 600 feet from a previously recorded archaeological site. Please be aware that archaeological sites are protected from knowing disturbance on both public and private lands in Washington States. Both RCW 27.44 and RCW 27.53.060 require that a person obtain a permit from our Department before excavating, removing, or altering Native American human remains or archaeological resources in Washington. Failure to obtain a permit is punishable by civil fines and other penalties under RCW 27.53.095, and by criminal prosecution under RCW 27.53.090_ Chapter 27.53.095 RCW allows the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation to issue civil penalties for the violation of this statute in an amount up to five thousand dollars, in addition to site restoration costs and investigative costs. Also, these remedies do not prevent concerned tribes from undertaking civil action in state or federal court, or law enforcement agencies from undertaking criminal investigation or prosecution_ Chapter 27.44.050 RCW allows the affected Indian Tribe to undertake civil action apart from any criminal prosecution if burials are disturbed. The scale of the proposed ground disturbing actions would destroy any archaeological resources present. Identification during construction is not a recommended detection method because inadvertent discoveries often result in costly construction delays and damage to the resource. Therefore, we request a professional archaeological survey of the project area be conducted prior to ground disturbing activities. The report should be submitted to DAHP and the interested Tribes for review prior to ground disturbance. Based on the results of the survey professional archaeological monitoring, additional archaeological work and/or a permit from DAHP may be required. EXHIBIT 6 If any federal funds or permits are involved Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, and its implementing regulations, 36CFR800, must be followed. This is a separate process from SEPA and requires formal government -to -government consultation with the affected Tribes and this agency_ We would appreciate receiving any correspondence or comments from concerned tribes or other parties concerning cultural resource issues that you receive. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project and we look forward to receiving the survey report. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360) 586-3088 or Gretchen.Kaehl er@dahp.wagov. Sincerely, Gretchen Kaehler Assistant State Archaeologist (360) 586-3088 etchen.kaehlerZadah .wa ov cc. Laura Murphy, Archaeologist, Muckleshoot Tribe Cecile Hansen, Chair, Duwamish Tribe Phil LeTourneau, Archaeologist, King County 2 4PI4LANDAU As50C1ATEs TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM L,�1,VRML TO: Peter Renner, City of Renton FROM: Timothy L. Syverson, L.G. �g[;to(N 1t7 O� DATE: June 6, 2011 pti a�� RE: PRE -DEMOLITION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY A �,� T��� 11'I BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS 508/510 SOUTH 3RD STREET �� RENTON, WASHINGTON yl On May 11, 2011, RGA Environmental (RGA), as a subconsultant to Landau Associates, completed a pre -demolition Hazardous Materials Survey at the Big 5 Sporting Goods retail store at 508 and 510 South 3`d Street, Renton, Washington 98055 (subject property). The survey included a good -faith inspection for suspected asbestos -containing materials (ACMs), possible polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) light ballasts and mercury -containing fluorescent light tubes, potential radioactive materials in exit signs, and chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) -containing equipment, and lead waste stream analysis. The survey was completed by Ms. Emily Kahler (Certification #11-2382; Expiration Date: May S, 2012) and Mr. Luke Swart (Certification #11-2387; Expiration Date: May 8, 2012) of RGA. A copy of the RGA survey report is attached. Table 1 provides a summary of the survey results. The results of the survey areas follows: + Eight (8) confirmed ACMs and four (4) assumed ACMs were identified in the onsite building. + One (1) toxicity characteristic leachate procedure (TCLP) sample was collected from the building to determine if the demolition waste stream would be considered hazardous relative to lead. The reported lead concentration was less than the 5 milligrams per liter threshold for determination that the waste stream is hazardous based on lead content; therefore, the demolition waste stream for the building would be considered non -hazardous relative to lead. • Five hundred and seven (507) 4 -inch fluorescent light tubes (regulated due to possible mercury content) were observed in the building. • One hundred and thirty (I 30) suspect PCB -containing light ballasts were observed in the building. + Two (2) exit signs that could contain radioactive material were observed in the building. • Two (2) free-standing refrigerators and one (1) drinking fountain with coolant fluids that could contain CFCs were observed in the building. In summary, ACMs were identified in the building. ACMs are required to be removed and disposed of by a Certified Asbestos Worker prior to any demolition, renovation, or remodeling that would disturb the materials. Materials containing less than I percent asbestos are not regulated for disposal purposes; however, they are regulated by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the 130 2nd Avenue South . Edm EXHIBIT 7 778-6409 • www.landauinc.com • Report Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Big 5 Sporting Goods Property 508 and 510 South 3rd Street Renton, Washington September 1, 2011 Prepared for City of Renton Renton, Washington k�e X5,0 P4 �' LANDAU ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South EXHIBIT 8 Edmonds, WA 98020 (425)778-0907 Admk Denis Law City of Mayor/ !R +I Department of Community and Economic Development May 8, 2012 C.E."Chip"Vincent, Interim Administrator Gretchen Kaehler Assistant State Archaeologist Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation PO Box 48343 Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 SUBJECT: RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY (LUA12-022, ECF, CU -H, SA -H, MOD) Response to Comment Letter Dear Ms. Kaehler: Thank you for your comments related to the Downtown Renton Library; dated May 2, 2012. Your letter has been included in the official project file and you have been made a party of record. Your comments will be considered by the reviewing official before making a decision on this project. If you have any further questions regarding this project feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, R cafe Timmons Associate Planner cc: File LUA12-022 City of Renton/Owner Maaike Post, Muller Hull Partnership/Contact Greg Smith, King County Library System/Applicant Renton City Hall - 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 - rentonwa.gov STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1063 S. Capitol Way, Suite 106 - Olympia, Washington 98501 Mailing address: PO Box 48343 • Olympia, Washington 9850.4-8343 (360) 586-3065 • Fax Number (360) 586-3061 - Website: www.dahp.wa.gov May 2, 2012 Ms. Rocale Timmons Associate Planner City of Renton, CED 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98507 In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 050212 -16 -KI Property: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD Renton Downtown Library Re: Archaeology - Survey Requested, Possible Professional archaeological monitoring requested Dear Ms. Timmons: We have reviewed the materials forwarded to our office for the proposed project referenced above. The project area has a high probability for containing archaeological resources. It is near the historic confluence of the Duwamish River and Black River and is approximately 600 feet from a previously recorded archaeological site. Please be aware that archaeological sites are protected from knowing disturbance on both public and private lands in Washington States. Both RCW 27.44 and RCW 27.53.060 require that a person obtain a permit from our Department before excavating, removing, or altering Native American human remains or archaeological resources in Washington. Failure to obtain a permit is punishable by civil fines and other penalties under RCW 27.53.095, and by criminal prosecution under RCW 27.53.090. Chapter 27.53.095 RCW allows the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation to issue civil penalties for the violation of this statute in an amount up to five thousand dollars, in addition to site restoration costs and investigative costs. Also, these remedies do not prevent concerned tribes from undertaking civil action in state or federal court, or law enforcement agencies from undertaking criminal investigation or prosecution. Chapter 27.44.050 RCW allows the affected Indian Tribe to undertake civil action apart from any criminal prosecution if burials are disturbed. The scale of the proposed ground disturbing actions would destroy any archaeological resources present. Identification during construction is not a recommended detection method because inadvertent discoveries often result in costly construction delays and damage to the resource. Therefore, we request a professional archaeological survey of the project area be conducted prior to ground disturbing activities. The report should be submitted to DAHP and the interested Tribes for review prior to ground disturbance. Based on the results of the survey professional archaeological monitoring, additional archaeological work and/or a permit from DAHP may be required. If any federal funds or permits are involved Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, and its implementing regulations, 36CFR800, must be followed. This is a separate process from SEPA and requires formal government -to -government consultation with the affected Tribes and this agency. We would appreciate receiving any correspondence or comments from concerned tribes or other parties concerning cultural resource issues that you receive. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project and we look forward to receiving the survey report. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360) 586-3088 or Gretchen.Kaehler@dahp.wa.gov_ Sincerely, Gretchen Kaehler Assistant State Archaeologist (360) 586-3088 gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa-gov cc. Laura Murphy, Archaeologist, Muckleshoot Tribe Cecile Hansen, Chair, Duwamish Tribe Phil LeTourneau, Archaeologist, King County 2 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ParicsDCIA COMMENTS DUE: MAY 31 2012 Housing APPLICATION NO: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 19, 2012 X APPLICANT: Greg Smith, KCLS PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons �� 9 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Downtown Library PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian Trons ortation 'P C SiTE AREA: 24,070 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): (Pq r-11 LOCATION: 510 S 3`d Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 15,083 square feei,� fi SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site PReview, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 square feet of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property. There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by Big5, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site which is proposed for demolition/removal as part of the proposal. Additionally, Gateway Park is located on the eastern portion of the site which would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library_ The proposed restriping of the existing parking area, to the north within a City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement, would create two additional parking spaces along with the addition of 6 new stalls, resulting in a total of 50 onsite parking stalls. The applicant is requesting a parking modification in order to decrease the minimum of parking spaces required onsite from 60 to 50 stalls. Access to the site is proposed via two curb cuts; one along Morris Ave 5 through to Logan Ave S. There are no critical areas located on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plontt Land/Shorefine Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Major information impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics X Li hVGlore Recreation Utilities Trons ortation Public Services Historic/cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14, 000 Feet 97tl�� i tsi �/,/-I AJ 4?-,& r�rf� r� ffr t-rt//l� .� /rIC'-"" r' B. POLICY -HEATED -Letu C. CODE RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information isAeeded to properly assess this proposal. re of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT����' M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 7, 2012 TO: Rocale Timmons, Planner FROM: Jan Illian, Plan Review SUBJECT: Renton Downtown Library 510 — S. P Street LUA 12-022, ECF I have reviewed the application for the Renton Downtown Library located at 510 — S. 3rd Street and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER: There is a 1 -inch domestic water meter serving the existing building. There is an existing 12 - inch water main in S. 3 d Street. The available de -rated fire flow from the 12 -inch main fronting the site in S. 3`d Street exceeds 3,000 gpm. Pressure available is approximately 65 psi. The proposed project is not located in an Aquifer Protection Zone. SEWER: There is a side sewer serving the existing building. STORM: There is a storm conveyance system in Logan Ave S. STREETS: There are existing street improvements. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The utility system development fee for water is owed if the size of the existing water meter is increased. The proposed site plan shows a new 1-% inch domestic water meter. The system development fee for water, based on the site plan with a credit for the existing meter, will be $5,590.00. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. A backflow device is required to be installed downstream of the domestic water meter. It has been shown on the site plan. 3. Applicant is required to install a separate fire line for the new fire sprinkler system. A double detector check valve assembly will be required to be installed for the fire sprinkler system. The assembly .shall be installed inside a vault outside the building, or inside the building in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. The vault and the backflow device have been shown on the site plan. 4. A utility system development fee for the new fire line is also required. The fee is based on the size of the fire service line. The fee for the 4 -inch fire line shown on the plan is $7,288.00. Fee is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. Renton Downtown Library — LUA 12-022 Page 2 of 3 May 7, 2012 5. The preliminary fire flow requirement per the Fire Marshal's office is 2,250 gpm. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm each. One primary hydrant is required within 150 feet from the buildings and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the building. One new hydrant is required and is shown on the plan. Final location will require approval by the Fire Department to meet the city standards. Any existing hydrants counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting, if not already in place and subject to verification by the Fire Department. SEWER 1. A utility system development fee for sewer is owed if the size of the existing water meter is increased. The proposed site plan shows a new 1-% inch domestic water meter. The system development sewer fee based on the site plan with credit for the existing meter will be $3,977.00. The system development fee is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. 2. The City will proceed with the optional plan of replacing the main through the new library property and installing a manhole where the existing bend in the existing main is located. SPU is working on permitting for this. This part of the work will be required to be installed by the developer. The City will follow behind this work and re -line the portion of the main under the remaining buildings. SURFACE WATER 1. A drainage plan and drainage report is included with the site plan application. The report has complied with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapter 1 and 2. All core and any special requirements were discussed in the report. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard, Existing Conditions. The project is exempt from flow control and water quality requirements. 2. A geotechnical report prepared by Geotechnical Engineering Services, dated November 2, 2011, was submitted with the application. Information on the water table and soil permeability was included in the report. Since the project is exempt from flow control and water quality, the engineer is proposing to tightline the roof and footing drains to a new 8 -inch PVC storm pipe that will cross the Seattle pipeline to the north and tie into an existing catch basin and storm conveyance system. 3. Surface Water System Development fees of $.405 per square foot of new impervious surface will apply but not less than $1,012. The Surface Water SDC fee is payable prior to issue of the construction permit. TRANSPORTATION 1. A traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated daily trip shall be assessed as determined by the ITE trip generation manual. This fee has been calculated with credit for the existing use to be $10,957. 2. Street improvements along S. 3rd Street shall match the existing sidewalk and lighting design improvements to the east. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton ordinances and standards. All new services shall be installed underground. 4. Pedestrian lighting is required. H I CED\Planning\Current Planning\PROJECT5\12-022.Rocale\Plan Review Comments LUA 12-022.doc Renton Downtown Library— LUA 12-022 Page 3of3 May 7, 2012 GENERAL COMMENTS 1. All construction utility permits for utilities, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer, Z. Any proposed rockeries or retaining walls greater than four feet (4') in height will require a separate building permit and special inspection. Separate permits and fees for water meters, side sewers, and backflow devices are required. 4. A cut and cap permit to abandon the existing water meter and side sewer will be required as part of the demolition permit. H I CED\Planning\Current Planning\PROJECTS\12-022.Rocale\Plan Review Comments LUA 12-022.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P101 &(f)LJ COMMENTS DUE: MAY 3, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LUA12-022, ECF, 5A -H, CU -H, MOD 44 DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 19, 2012 ''." APPLICANT: Greg Smith, KCLS PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons ; PROJECT TITLE: Renton Downtown Library PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 24,070 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): F •` E U LOCATION. 510 5 3rd Street I PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 15,083 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 square feet of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property. There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by Big5, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site which is proposed for demolition/removal as part of the proposal. Additionally, Gateway Park is located on the eastern portion of the site which would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library. The proposed restriping of the existing parking area, to the north within a City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement, would create two additional parking spaces along with the addition of 6 new stalls, resulting in a total of 50 onsite parking stalls. The applicant is requesting a parking modification in order to decrease the minimum of parking spaces required onsite from 60 to 50 stalls. Access to the site is proposed via two curb cuts; one along Morris Ave S through to Logan Ave S_ There are no critical areas located on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Environment Minor Impacts Probable More Major information impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Notura! Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht/Glore Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14, 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and hove identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signatu7114 ctor or Ikuthorized Representative Date -" f N/ S# 892 TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: Project Description: Downtown Library 15,000 sf Library replacing Existing 12,185 sf Sports Retail Store Land Use Type: 1 X Retail XNon-retail Calculation: 57.24 x 12.185 = 697.5 56.24 x 15 = 843.6 843.6 -- 697.5 = 146.1 ADT 146.1 x $75.00 = $10,957.50 Method of Calculation: X ITE Trip Generation Manual, 81h Edition ❑ Traffic Study ❑ Other (815) Freestanding Discount Store 57.24 trips/1000 sf (590) Library 56.24 trips/1000 sf Transportation Mitigation Fee: $10,957.50 Calculated by: K.Kittrick Date: 2/15/2012 Date of Payment: City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL; The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 square feet of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property. There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by Big5, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site which is proposed for demolition/removal as part of the proposal. Additionally, Gateway Park is located on the eastern portion of the site which would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library. The proposed restriping of the existing parking area, to the north within a City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement, would create two additional parking spaces along with the addition of 6 new stalls, resulting in a total of 50 onsite parking stalls. The applicant is requesting a parking modification in order to decrease the minimum of parking spaces required onsite from 60 to 50 stalls. Access to the site is proposed via two curb cuts; one along Morris Ave S through to Logan Ave S. There are no critical areas located on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �� COMMENTS DUE: MAY 3, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 19, 2012 APPLICANT: Greg Smith, KCLS PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons Plonts PROJECT TITLE: Renton Downtown Library PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 24,070 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): LOCATION: 510 S 3" Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 15,083 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL; The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 square feet of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property. There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by Big5, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site which is proposed for demolition/removal as part of the proposal. Additionally, Gateway Park is located on the eastern portion of the site which would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library. The proposed restriping of the existing parking area, to the north within a City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement, would create two additional parking spaces along with the addition of 6 new stalls, resulting in a total of 50 onsite parking stalls. The applicant is requesting a parking modification in order to decrease the minimum of parking spaces required onsite from 60 to 50 stalls. Access to the site is proposed via two curb cuts; one along Morris Ave S through to Logan Ave S. There are no critical areas located on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Probable More Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plonts land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources ~T'MF S WeT A- 59 Z Ae3 _Z/( S�%_o it __ B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information impacts impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreotion Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of proboble impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal_ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P C5 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 3, 2012 1 6J APPLICATION NO: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD DATE CIRCULATED. APRIL 19, 2012 APPLICANT: Greg Smith, KCLS PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Renton Downtown Library PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 24,070 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): LOCATION: 510 S 3`d Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 15,083 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 square feet of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property. There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by Big5, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site which is proposed for demolition/removal as part of the proposal_ Additionally, Gateway Park is located on the eastern portion of the site which would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library. The proposed restriping of the existing parking area, to the north within a City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement, would create two additional parking spaces along with the addition of 6 new stalls, resulting in a total of 50 onsite parking stalls. The applicant is requesting a parking modification in order to decrease the minimum of parking spaces required onsite from 60 to 50 stalls. Access to the site is proposed via two curb cuts; one along Morris Ave S through to Logan Ave S. There are no critical areas located on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information impacts Impacts Necessary forth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li hVGlare Recreation utilities Trons ortabon Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Doctor or Authorized Representative Date FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT-�� City of M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 17, 2012 TO: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Renton Library Environmental Impact Comments: The fire mitigation impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building area. Credit would be granted for the existing building to be removed. Code Related Comments: The preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,250 gpm based on a fully fire sprinklered building. Three fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 -feet of the proposed building and two hydrants are required within 300 -feet. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code including 5 -inch storz fittings. It appears adequate fire flow exists in this area. 2. Both an approved fire alarm and fire sprinkler system is required throughout the building. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting. Fire alarm system shall be fully addressable and full detection is required. A direct outside door is required to the fire sprinkler riser control room. 3. An annual place of assembly permit is required for occupancies exceeding 50 persons. An automated external defibrillator (AED) is required if the occupancy load exceeds 300 persons. 4. Fire department apparatus access is adequate. 5. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for pre -fire planning purposes prior to occupancy of the building. City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r i re, COMMENTS DUE: MAY 3, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 19, 2012 APPLICANT: Greg Smith, KCLS PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECTTITLE: Renton Downtown Library PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan Illian SITE AREA: 24,070 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): LOCATION: 510 S 3rd Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 15,083 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction of a new 15,083 square foot public library. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 square feet of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property_ There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by Big5, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site which is proposed for demolition/removal as part of the proposal. Additionally, Gateway Park is located on the eastern portion of the site which would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library. The proposed restriping of the existing parking area, to the north within a City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement, would create two additional parking spaces along with the addition of 6 new stalls, resulting in a total of 50 onsite parking stalls. The applicant is requesting a parking modification in order to decrease the minimum of parking spaces required onsite from 60 to 50 stalls. Access to the site is proposed via two curb cuts; one along Morris Ave S through to Logan Ave S. There are no critical areas located on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Heolth Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14,000 Feet 6 ilt S. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS ild _A-, 4� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 41&- 5� � -Z Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C D2.✓ COMMENTS DUE MAY 3, 2012 APPLICATION NO: LUA12-022, ECF, 5A -H, CU -H, MOD DATE CIRCULATED: AP , 012 APPLICANT: Greg Smith, KCLS PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Renton Downtown Library PROJECT REVIEWER: Jan illian SITE AREA: 24,070 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): LOCATION: 510 S 3rd Street PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross) 15,083 square feet SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, King County Library System (KCLS), is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review, a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit, Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Parking Modification for the construction o a new 15,083 square foot public library. The project site consists of three parcels containing a total of 24,070 square feet of Center Downtown (CD) zoned property. There is an existing retail structure on the west end of the site, formerly used by Big5, and an associated parking lot in the center of the site which is proposed for demolition/removal as part of the proposal_ Additionally, Gateway Park is located on the eastern portion of the site which would be redesigned as part of the proposal in order to create an entry plaza for the new library. The proposed restriping of the existing parking area, to the north within a City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement, would create two additional parking spaces along with the addition of 6 new stalls, resulting in a total of 50 onsite parking stalls_ The applicant is requesting a parking modification in order to decrease the minimum of parking spaces required onsite from 60 to 50 stalls. Access to the site is proposed via two curb cuts; one along Morris Ave S through to Logan Ave S. There are no critics areas rocated on site. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Probable Probable Mare Environment Minor Mojor information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housin Aesthetics Li ht/Glare Recreation Utilities Trans ortotion Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS tS �'D��c4 ves-c,4i-fs A S Igvl # 16A o f O j oYtinr�j 4 co VM l V7 i � } % C rr i W W VI [ t(,, D 5 +0 i�V � r Z-� �J C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. .-� 4Z 21 / rz of Dv ector or Authorized Representative Dat 'City of NOTICE OFI ON 5 GNIOF LANCE -MI IGATEQ DNS MI) DETERMINATION OF A Maagr April has been filed and acnptM with the C"'"ent of Community IL Etonpmlc 0melopmene ICED}- Apriling Dlylybn of The bd ar Renton. Thefoaowing briefly desudbesthe epgIjcdIb and the rlecpsary Public APprpnld DATE OF NOTIEE OF APPUCATION: April 19, 2U11 LAND USE NUMBER: LD0.12-021, ECF, 5A -H, CU'H, Moo PROJECT NAME: Heston Downtown Library PROJECT OESCRIPIION: The appill Nlrrg County library System I(CLS), Is requesting Hearing Examiner Site Flan Review. a Hearing Ecaminer Condltlanal Use Pem+iU Emtrpnmental jS;PA) nslsts of three parcels MatllAcallan for the rpns[N[tbn OF a new 15,0g3 square foot public library, The p oiect 'Theie Is an eaisling retail $Wc[vre contalmng a taut of 2a1020 it od an square tett ar Center Downtown ICDI coned prp. repel3y.5". which is proposed fpr to red of ank selrnavori es Fara aF [h proposal. Additlo ally dGatewav FarN�sflocated on the eastern Portion of the site which would rte retlesigned es part of the proposal In order t ueace an entry piaxa for the new 1lbrary. The proposed restl of the eaiHing Pill log area, to the north within a City of Seat" Cedar grcnri lot. a easement, would create iso additional parking spaces along wnjpndllicallon ort order o decrease thelmmVmumtof paddng paces par"'"'t"` The applicant is requesting a par mg required Amit' from 6010 50 'tail" A—" to the site is or via two caro cuts; one along Morris Ave 5 through t Lagan Ave 5. There are iw [,!tial areaslocated an site. PROJECT LOCATION: $10 S 3w Street ,Rr lONAL DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE, MmGATEO SONS.Mj: As the Lead Ages d mY. oje[t. T1:,,,I re deten,,rreed that signinkod" envlmnmenul Impacts are unlikely lip resutr ham the propo notice that a DNS- pennitted under the RCW e3.11G11D, the City of Rennin H using the OPUonal DNSM process Ic Aiye into . oON mmieelynt Ii, ad. HThtr< wnil,e natcpia e& portae faAowing therelli and for the Pthssga osteo ofdt , Threshold DeS.M are terinnatioo e£sl SignitkanceMktigated IONS -M}, A 14 -day appear period will fokbw the Issuance of the DNSM 4ERMrt gpPl1CAT10N BATE: March 37, 2012 NOTICE OF [OMPIETEAPPLICATION: April 19, 2032 ApFL1CANT/PROSECT CONTACT PERSOW WA Mnike ' 591 1Miller HUII Fml: mpP d@tollerh P. ccomnbla Serer[, 6' FI.; Seattle, WA 04; parmhs(Revlaw Requested: Ensaronnaenlal ISEP0 RiYlew, Hearing Eaaminer Slle Plan Arakw, Hnring Examiner Conditional Use Rwal.w, and Parking Modification Review Other Permits which may be required: WIWing and Construction Permits Requested studies: Geotechnical RepprC Drainage Report, and Humat surrey Location whara aPPllcabon may Department ofCpmrmanity A Ecorromle DerejPgmerrt{CE01-Planning be rauiew.d. DlvWon, Slrth Floor Renton Oty Hail. 1055 South Grady Way. Benton• WA 99057 IF You would INe to M made a party o F rccold t rccelve further Iol-111p1 on [hit Proposed projM, oempkle this form aM rr[um to: city or Renton, cED - Plan nin8 DHlsmn, 1055 so. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. NamelFlle No.: Renin Downtown Litmk AUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHGNE NO.: PUBLIC HEARING: rhearinge tt. elrsItole forjune1520126efcre the Ren•on ri, n a min rInA n un ICh Hearings begin at 100 p m. no the 7th Floor of the new Renton [Ity Ha I located at 1055 South Grady Way- 00N51STENCY O'YERVlEW: Ipningfland Use: Th a subject site is designated urban Centel -Downtown SUC Dl .1 the City of Fenton Eomprehenarce Land Use Map and Commerclal Downtown on the Ctys Zoning Map. Emlronmental Dcrainr nt'that Evaluatelhe Prap... d Aral[[[: Envirnnmentel[SEPA) Checklhl Deerlopment Matta tons Used For Project Mitlgatian: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, PMC 4-2.1208 and other app llca Ne codec and regu�ations as apprup,latc. prop med Mitigation Measures: The Following MRlgatlon Measures wit likely be Imposed on the proposed project. These racommended snilfgado, Measures address project Impacts not covered try end codes and regulations as cited abme. 77, opps[ t will be requrrrd to pay the opprapriotr TronsparNllan 0,06y Non Fee; and The apr iconl coif be repuved to VdF the nppropripte ore Mingoriort Fee. Comments on the •bone application must be subrri"d In writing W Rocale Timmons, Associate planner, CFD - Planning Li da n. 1055 south Grady Way, Heston, WA 99057, by S:W PM on May 3, 2012. This matter Is also ,.m..vely scheduled for a publlc h -ring ort June 19, 2012, at 1:00 pm., Cauncll Chamhem, Serrnth Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Gndy Way. Renton- If you are interested In anending the hearing. please conlact the Planning Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (4751 430.7181. if commenU cannot be submitted In writing by the date Indicated above, you may sUN appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Eeaminer. If you have quesdons about this pmpesal, or wish Io be made a party of record .nd ren.we additional information by mail, please contact the prolect manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified or any decision an thls proienf- CONTACT PERSON: Roeale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219; Eml: rtimmons@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE TFIE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLJNG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION .�.: �tl'Tq�l"AtaEAt117pT� .f I 1 CERTIFICATION 1, �c►i T , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted in _ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on 0 Date: MZ signed: t V STATE OF WASHINGTON } } SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Lit rA i :Il,lnr r, r signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses andiiiiiiiiirawses mentioned in the instrument. h Notary Public inland for the State of Washington Notary (Print): f A r-,)­� e ' My appointment expires: t4 4k,{ 2 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 19th day of April, 2012, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, Notice of Application, Site Plan, Environmental Checklist documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Maaike Post, Miller Hull Partnership Contact Peter Renner - City of Renton Owner Greg Smith, KCLS Applicant 300' Surrounding Property Owners See attached (Signature of Sender): 7f` STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 00% S5 COUNTY OF KING ) {W $l► 13 = I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker to signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fopurposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: l c,�s��i �`�, ac'l2- Notary Pubtic in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print): My appointment expires:wsc(J Ci Project Name: Renton Downtown Library Project Number: LUA12-022, ECF, SA -H, CU -H, MOD template - affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology ** WDFW - Larry Fisher* Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 Issaquah, WA 98027 39015 — 1721d Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn. Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS -240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172"d Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin PO Box 48343 PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Steve Roberge Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 *Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template - affidavit of service by mailing 784180002502 784180006503 783930025003 N& C INVESTMENT LLC COOLEY D B J LLC KNOX CHARLES E 7432 SE 27TH ST PO BOX 272 PO BOX 493 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 RENTON WA 98057 BELLEVUE WA 98009 000720018803 SEATTLE CITY OF SPU-WTR 700 5TH AVE STE 4900 -RPS PO BOX 34018 SEATTLE WA 98124 569600005502 RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 784180001504 FAKHARZADEH M HADI PO BOX 78404 SEATTLE WA 98178 569600006500 RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 783930023008 GOOD PARTNERSHIP C/0 SENS HOLING & GENE PO BOX 1276 RENTON WA 98056 783930024006 GOOD PAR'T'NERSHIP NW LLC 7259 S SUNNYCREST RD SEATTLE WA 98178 784180015504 FAIRWAY FUND IV LLC 6650 SW REDWOOD LN #290 PORTLAND OR 97224 784080000507 THARP JOHN M 232 WELLS AVE N RENTON WA 98057 784180016502 SALVATION ARMY PO BOX 9219 SEATTLE WA 98109 569600000503 RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 784080011504 BREWER CRAIG MD 315 MORRRIS AVE S RENTON WA 98057 569600012003 RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 783930034005 783980006002 BURNETT AVENUE LAND LLC HOLLAND DANIEL J+ALMA C 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY SUITE 40 320 MORRIS AVE S LOGAN UT 84321 RENTON WA 98055 784180018300 ROXY LLC PO BOX 1754 RENTON WA 98057 784180000506 SOUTH 2ND STREET L L C 2291 NE 60TH ST SEATTLE WA 98115 784180020504 RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY RENTON WA 98057 784080002008 SOUTH THIRD ST ASSC 413 S THIRD ST RENTON WA 98055 783980001607 RENTON CIVIC THEATRE P 0 BOX 1556 RENTON WA 98057 784180013509 FIRST CH OF CHRIST SCIENT 220 WHITWORTH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 784080012007 CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF SEAT 710 9TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98104 783930034500 BURNETT AVENUE LAND LLC 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY SUITE 41 LOGAN UT 84321 783980003009 FREEMAN STEPHEN 812 S TRENTON ST SEATTLE WA 98108 784180019506 RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY RENTON WA 98057 784080001000 569600008001 784180018508 SOUTH THIRD STREET ASSOC RENTON CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOLORES A 413 S THIRD ST 1055 S GRADY WAY 4650 SOMERSET AVE SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98006 0 r 783980014006 783930027009 HANSEN DOUGLAS NORWOOD ERIK 311 SMITHERS AVE S 316 SMITHERS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 783980013503 783980005004 TURNER SYBIL A GRIFFITH GREGORY M 315 SMITHERS AVE S 310 MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA 98057 RENTON WA 98055 783930026001 569600001006 OHNEMUS PAUL D RENAISSANCE URBAN LIVING 312 B SMITHERS C/O JACOB MARBLE RENTON WA 98055 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY #400 LOGAN UT 84321 784180018003 569600007003 SALVATION ARMY THE RENTON CITY OF NORTHWEST DIVISION 1055 S GRADY WAY PO BOX 9219 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98109 783980001508 783980000500 KKM ENTERPRISES LLC WONG KAI ET AL C/O KING LEE C/O KING LEE PO BOX 80563 PO BOX 80563 SEATTLE WA 98108 SEATTLE WA 98108 783980013008 JOHNSON RAY N Sc JULIE A 18808 SE 170TH ST RENTON WA 98058 569600003002 N & C INVESTMENT LLC 7432 SE 27TH ST MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 569600005007 RENTON CITY OF 1055 S GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 783980005509 MCLAUGHLIN RYAN & SHANNON 24503 146TH PL SE ISSAQUAH WA 98042 783980003504 RENTON CIVIC THEATRE P 0 BOX 1556 RENTON WA 98057 LANDAU 14 ASSOCIATES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM am"*&WxIcMMCWOCiI TO: Peter Renner, City of Renton FROM: Timothy L. Syverson, L.G. f 'Loo 0 DATE: June 6, 2011 1C;M '�0 V"oA RE: PRE -DEMOLITION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY Q �p,� Ta\ BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS �(}�� 508/510 SOUTH 3RD STREET�� RENTON, WASHINGTON On May 11, 2011, RGA Environmental (RGA), as a subconsultant to Landau Associates, completed a pre -demolition Hazardous Materials Survey at the Big 5 Sporting Goods retail store at 508 and 510 South P Street, Renton, Washington 98055 (subject property). The survey included a good -faith inspection for suspected asbestos -containing materials (ACMs), possible polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) light ballasts and mercury -containing fluorescent light tubes, potential radioactive materials in exit signs, and chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) -containing equipment, and lead waste stream analysis. The survey was completed by Ms. Emily Kahler (Certification #11-2382; Expiration Date: May 8, 2012) and Mr. Luke Swart (Certification #11-2387; Expiration Date: May 8, 2012) of RGA. A copy of the RGA survey report is attached. Table 1 provides a summary of the survey results. The results of the survey are as follows: • Eight (8) confirmed ACMs and four (4) assumed ACMs were identified in the onsite building. • One (1) toxicity characteristic leacbate procedure (TCLP) sample was collected from the building to determine if the demolition waste stream would be considered hazardous relative to lead. The reported lead concentration was less than the 5 milligrams per liter threshold for determination that the waste stream is hazardous based on lead content; therefore, the demolition waste stream for the building would be considered non -hazardous relative to lead. • Five hundred and seven (507) 4 -inch fluorescent light tubes (regulated due to possible mercury content) were observed in the building. + One hundred and thirty (130) suspect PCB -containing light ballasts were observed in the building. • Two (2) exit signs that could contain radioactive material were observed in the building. • Two (2) free-standing refrigerators and one (1) drinking fountain with coolant fluids that could contain CFCs were observed in the building. In summary, ACMs were identified in the building. ACMs are required to be removed and disposed of by a Certified Asbestos Worker prior to any demolition, renovation, or remodeling that would disturb the materials. Materials containing less than 1 percent asbestos are not regulated for disposal purposes; however, they are regulated by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the 130 2nd Avenue South . Edmonds, WA 98020 • (425) 778-0907 . fax (425) 778-6409 • www.landauine.com Washington industrial Safety and Health Act for worker safety considerations. More specific recommendations regarding the handling of ACMs are provided in the attached RGA report. Based on TCLP analysis, the demolition debris will be considered non -hazardous relative to lead. More specific recommendations regarding the handling of lead -containing materials are provided in the attached RGA report. Potential PCB -containing light ballasts, fluorescent lights, and equipment with possible radioactive material or CFCs were also Identified in the building. These materials should be disposed of or recycled in accordance with all applicable federal and state regulations. TLS/ccy ATTACHMENTS Table 1: Summary of Asbestos -Containing Building Materials Attachment 1: RGA Environmental Asbestos, Lead, and Other Hazardous Materials Survey Report Q6146111 P-.429WlO%FileRmlR%HazMatSu vey—tm.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2 Page 1 of 1 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS -CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS RETAIL STORE — RENTON, WASHINGTON Material Estimated Description Room Asbestos Content Quantity CONFIRMED ASBESTOS - CONTAINING MATERIAL: Red Vinyl Floor Tile Throughout Retail Space, 5% Chrysotile Unknown 06106/11 P:1829WlO\FilaRmlRlHazMa[Survey_tbl.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2"d Floor Men's Room Asbestos Layers 3, 4, and 5 Leveling Compound Throughout Retail Space 3% Chrysotile Unknown Layer 3 Asbestos Black Asphaltic Material Front Entrance Layer 5 $ 7 3% Chrysotile Unknown Asbestos Gray Wall Board/Joint Compound Throughout Retail Space 2% Chrysotile Unknown Asbestos, Wall Unit as a whole contains <1 % asbestos TSI Attic, 2" diameter pipe, 65% Chrysotile Unknown debris on floor of attic TSI Elbow Attic, 2" diameter pipe, 15% Chrysotile and Unknown debris on floor of attic 5% Amosite Asbestos Window Glazing Roof Windows east side 2% Chrysotile 2 Asbestos Gray Roof Patch Roof 2% Chrysotile 100 square Asbestos feet ASSUMED ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS: Fire Rated Door Insulation Throughout Assumed 9 doors Electrical Wiring Throughout Assumed Unknown CAB Board Insulator Apartment Electrical Assumed 10 square Panels feet HVAC Units Interior Insulation or Throughout Assumed Unknown Caulking Source: RGA Environmental. 2011. Asbestos, Lead and Other Hazardous Materials Survey Report, Prepared for Landau Associates. May 23, 2011. 06106/11 P:1829WlO\FilaRmlRlHazMa[Survey_tbl.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES ATTACHMENT 1 RGA Environmental Asbestos, Lead, and Other Hazardous Materials Survey Report AztkRGA ENVIRONMENTAL May 23, 2011 Tim Syverson Landau Associates, Inc. 1302 "d Ave. S Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Good Faith Asbestos, Lead and Other Hazardous Materials Survey Report for 610 South 3`d Street in Renton, WA. (Project # LAND27664) Dear Mr. Syverson, Attached is the RGA Environmental good faith asbestos, lead and other hazardous materials survey report for 510 South 3rd Street in Renton, WA. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions regarding this report feel free to contact us at (206) 281-8858. Sincerely, Deborah Mullins Project Manager RGA Environmental 1730 Minor Avenue -- Seattle, Washington - 98101 -- 206.281.8858 -- 206.281.8922 Fax V RG A ENVIRONMENTAL 0 Improving Lives, Reducing Risks Asbestos, Lead and Other Hazardous Materials Survey Report 510 South 3'd Street Renton, WA. Project No. LAND27664 Prepared for: Tim Syverson Landau Associates, Inc. 1302 nd Ave. S Edmonds, WA 98020 Prepared by: RGA Environmental, Inc. 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101 206-281-8858 May 23, 2011 Report prepared by: Sr. Industrial Hygienist Angela Harkins Report reviewed by: Zlxea . )1 Debie Mullins Project Manager www. rgaanv-cam Table of Contents Section Paqe 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................6 2.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 7 3.0 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE..............................................................................8 4.0 SAMPLING PLAN AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS............................................10 5.0 SURVEY RESULTS.............................................................................................11 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATIONS.......................................................14 7.0 LIMITS OF SURVEY............................................................................................15 Attachments: Laboratory Results Field Notes Certification 11.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On May 11, 2011, Ms. Emily Kahler and Mr. Luke Swart of RGA Environmental (RGA) conducted a good faith survey for suspect asbestos -containing building materials, waste stream analysis for lead leachate (TCLP), and other hazardous materials present at the subject property in Seattle, Washington. Ms. Kahler and Mr. Swart are both Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)-accredited building inspectors (Certificate #11-2382 and Expiration Date 05-8-12, Certificate #11-2387 and Expiration Date 05-08- 12. A copy of their certificates can be found in the enclosed attachments. The survey was conducted at 210 South 3`d Street in Renton, WA. The sampling was conducted at the request of and access to the area of interest was provided by Mr. Tim Syverson of Landau Associates prior to planned demolition. 1.1 Asbestos See Table 1 below for a summary of the asbestos containing materials found in the survey. Table 1 - Summary of Asbestos -Containing Materials found at 510 South 3`d Street in Renton, WA. Material Description Approximate Approximate Location Location Asbestos Content (Homogeneous Material Fire Rated Door Insulation Throughout Quantity Electrical Wiring Throughout Retail Space, 'ASSUMED Unknown CAB Board Insulator Red Vinyl Floor Tile Second Floor Mens Room 5% Chrysotile unknown Layers 3 4 and 5 Throughout ASSUMED Unknown Leveling Compound Throughout Retail Space 3% Chrysotile unknown La er 3 Black Asphaltic Material Front Entrance 3% Chrysotile unknown Layer 5 & 7 Throughout Retail Space 2% Chrysotile GWB 1 JC Wall Unit as a whole contains unknown a 1% asbestos Attic TSI 2" diameter pipe 65% Chrysotile unknown Debris on floor of attic Attic 15% Chrysotile TSI Elbow 2" diameter elbow 5% Amosite unknown Debris on floor and pipe Window GlazingRoof windows east side 2% Chrysotile 2 EA Gra Roof Patch Roof 2% Ch sotile 100 SF SF — Square Feet LF — Linear Feet Summary of Assumed Asbestos Containing Materials Material Description Approximate Location Asbestos Content (Homogeneous Material) Quantity Fire Rated Door Insulation Throughout ASSUMED 9 Doors Electrical Wiring Throughout 'ASSUMED Unknown CAB Board Insulator Apartments Electrical ASSUMED 10 SF Panels HVAC Units Interior Throughout ASSUMED Unknown Insulation or Caulking LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 6 The full scope of sampling is presented in Section 5. Caution should be used during the demolition to ensure that additional materials are not uncovered. This report should be presented to any contractor or subcontractor performing work at 510 South V Street in Renton, WA. In the event that additional materials are discovered, the material should be sampled and analyzed to determine if it contains asbestos prior to disturbance. 1.2 Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Process (TCLP) The result of the TCLP sample for the commercial/residential building located at 510 South 3`d Street in Renton, Washington was below the 5 mg/L threshold for determination of the waste stream as hazardous with respect to lead. Therefore, the material from the demolition of this building may be disposed of as general demolition debris. 1.3 Mercury Light Tubes Five hundred and seven (507) 4' fluorescent light tubes were observed in the structure. 1.4 PCB Ballasts One hundred and thirty (130) ballasts which could potentially contain PCB's were observed in the structure. 1.5 Exit Signs Two (2) exit signs that could potentially contain radioactive material were observed in the structure. 1.6 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's) Two (2) free standing refrigerators and one (1) drinking fountain with coolant fluids which could potentially contain CFC's were observed in the structure. This survey was conducted to document the presence and locations of hazardous materials (asbestos, lead, mercury light tubes, PCB ballasts, exit signs and CFCs) in and on the structure located at 510 South 3"d Street in Renton, Washington for the purposes of demolition. Accessible building areas were visited and samples were collected of building materials suspected to contain asbestos (wallboard, flooring materials and miscellaneous materials). All accessible building components were also sampled for the purpose of collecting a TCLP for waste stream analysis with respect to lead. See Table 2 for a list of materials sampled for asbestos. Efforts were made during the inspection to find all asbestos containing materials in the structure. Limited penetrations were made through walls, .floors, and ceilings to identify concealed materials. If suspect materials are identified in wall cavities or under the building, any demolition work should halt and an accredited AHERA inspector should LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 7 sample the material for the presence of asbestos. Any materials not sampled and properly identified must be sampled by an AHERA inspector prior to disturbance. All contractors working on the building site must review this inspection report prior to participating in the renovation, per WAC 296-62-07721 "Communication of Hazards to Employees." 3.1 Asbestos The intent of the asbestos survey is to comply with governing asbestos regulations required by the State of Washington and Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA). The State of Washington requires a written "good faith inspection" for identification of asbestos -containing materials prior to any remodeling, maintenance, or demolition work. During demolition and construction work it is the responsibility of the owner and the contractors to make this survey document available to all concerned parties who may be handling the building materials. Additionally, PSCAA requires that a copy of the written asbestos survey be made available on-site for inspection by a PSCAA Control Officer during construction and demolition work. The survey is required to be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 763.86. These federal standards require inspections to be conducted by an EPA/AHERA accredited building inspector with analysis to be provided by an asbestos laboratory accredited by the National Bureau of Standards. The requirements are described in Article 1 and Article 4 of PSCAA's Asbestos Control Standards. All survey work was conducted in compliance with the above mentioned standards. 3.2 Lead The Washington State Department of Labor and Industries defines a lead-based paint to be a coating with any detectable lead. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have defined a lead-based paint as any coating containing greater than 0.5% lead or 1.0 Mg/CM2 of lead. In Washington, workers disturbing lead -containing coatings are covered under the lead standard (WAC 296-155-176) until shown they are not being exposed above the action limit of 30 pg/m3 and the permissible exposure limit of 50 pg/m3. The requirements of this standard include, but are not limited to, air monitoring, respiratory protection, medical surveillance, lead work plan, warning signs, and wash stations. When lead is discovered in a paint coating, worker protection and environmental protection requirements apply to all construction activities that may disturb these coatings. The issues surrounding the demolition of materials that have lead -containing coatings include worker exposure, public health, and waste characterization. 3.2.1 Worker Exposure to Lead LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 8 WAC 296-155-176, Lead, applies to all construction work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead. Construction work includes activities such as demolition or salvage, removal or encapsulation, and renovation of materials that contain lead. When a worker may be exposed to lead, the employer must take the following actions according to WAC 296-155-176: Perform an exposure assessment for each operation where the employee may be exposed to lead at or above 34 micrograms per cubic meter (pg/m). The exposure assessment consists of personal air monitoring to determine representative lead exposure levels for the work being performed; 2. During the exposure assessment for demolition operations, the employer must provide and require to be worn half -mask air -purifying respirators equipped with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and disposable clothing; 3. A designated change area which allows for separate storage areas for work and street clothing to prevent cross contamination; 4. Hand washing facilities to allow employees to wash their hands and faces 5. Biological monitoring in the form of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels. 6. Training to include hazard communication, safety, and the limitations, proper use, and maintenance of respirators. In addition to the protective equipment and hygiene requirements, the employer must attempt to reduce the levels of airborne lead through the use of engineering controls such as ventilation and wet methods. 3.2.2 Public Health The owner should ensure that the general public will not have access to the site during demolition activities. In addition, controlling visible emissions (dust) will decrease the airborne concentration of lead, thus decreasing the airborne exposure levels of the general public and potential contamination of surrounding areas from dust migration. 3.2.3 Waste Characterization RGA Environmental (RGA) collected samples of the proposed waste stream from the above captioned site for the purposes of waste characterization. Waste characterization is determined using the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Process (TCLP) which determines the leaching potential of lead in the construction debris. A hazardous waste is defined as a waste stream which contains leachable lead above the allowable limit of 5 parts per million (ppm). LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report_doc 9 4.1 Asbestos 4.1.1 Objectives The objective of the survey was to determine the quantity and location of building materials (wallboard, flooring materials, etc.) that contain asbestos. 4.1.2 Asbestos Sampling Protocol This survey was conducted using a protocol adapted from the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA). The protocol is as follows: Group materials into homogeneous sampling areas based on visual observations and information provided about building renovations. 2. Quantify each homogeneous sampling area and collect samples from each area using the "3-5-7" criteria for surfacing material to determine the number of samples needed. Quantify and collect a minimum of three samples of each thermal system insulation. The number of samples collected of miscellaneous materials was determined by the inspector. 3. Samples were collected from areas of easy access and minimum disturbance to building occupants. 4. Samples of each material were taken to the substrate, ensuring that all components of the material were included. 5. Sampling was performed by an AHERA accredited building inspector. 4.1.3 Asbestos Sampling Procedure 1. Label sample container with unique identification number. Record sample number, sample location, type of material, and approximate material quantity on data form. 2. Extract sample using a clean knife or other tool to collect approximately one tablespoon of the material. Penetrate all layers of material. 3. Place sample in a container and tightly seal it. 4. Clean tools with wet wipes. Clean any material debris from sampling area. 4.1.4 Asbestos Laboratory Analysis The bulk samples were analyzed by the RGA laboratory using polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining in accordance with US EPA method 6001R-931116 as specified in 40 CFR Chapter 1 (7-1-93 edition) Part 763, Subpart F, Appendix A, pages LAN D27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 10 499-504. Polarizing light microscopy quantifies asbestos concentrations at between 100% and 1 % detection levels. Levels below 1 % can only be stated as "trace." The RGA laboratory is a member of the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), NVLAP Code #200613-0. Samples were not analyzed by point count to determine asbestos concentrations. For samples containing more than one separable layer of materials, the laboratory report will include findings for each layer (labeled L-1 for layer one and L-2 for layer two, etc.) and a total percentage for the entire sample, if applicable. The asbestos concentration in the sample is determined by visual estimation. 4.2 TCLP 4.2.1 Objectives The objective of the TCLP sampling was to collect samples of the proposed waste stream from the above captioned site for the purposes of waste characterization. Waste characterization is determined using the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Process (TCLP) which determines the leaching potential of lead in the construction debris. A hazardous waste is defined as a waste stream which contains leachable lead above the allowable limit of 5 parts per million (ppm). 5.1 Asbestos Table 2 (below) contains an inventory of the building materials sampled for asbestos at the commercial/residential building located at 510 South 3rd Street in Renton, WA. All location references are those listed in the attached site drawings and field notes, and may not coincide with identifiers on site. The location column identifies all locations in the building where the homogenous materials were identified. Actual sample locations are identified in the attached site maps. Entries in the table that are bolded indicate a sample that is positive for asbestos. Table 2 - Building Materials Sampled for Asbestos at the Building Located at 510 South 3rd Street in Renton, WA. LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 11 Asbestos Sample ID Material Description Location Friability Content A -D1 Blue Carpet with Mastic and t 1 Flaor- Front Desk L-4 5% Chrysotile Non -Friable LevelingCompound B-01 9"X9" Brown Vinyl Floor Tile and 1st Floor - Front Desk L-33% Chrysotile won -Friable Mastic L-5 5% Chrysotile C-01 1'X1' Blue Vinyl Floor Tile and 1 st Floor - Front Desk NO Non -Friable Mastic D-01 Grey Carpet and Mastic 18 Floor — Front L-4 5% Chrysotile won -Friable Entrance E-01 4" Brown Cove Base and Mastic 15 Floor— Front Entrance NO Non -Friable F-014" Blue Cove Base and Mastic 15 Floor Front Desk NO Non -Friable Asbestos Sample ID Material DescriptionLocation Friability Content LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 11 LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 12 Brown, Marbled Pattern Vinyl st Floor L-5 3% Chrysotile G-01 Floor Tile with Mastic and 1 - North End L-6 5% Chrysotile Non -Friable Leveling Compound of Store L-7 3% Chrysotile Light Marbled Pattern Vinyl Floor sr 1 Floor - NW Corner L-4 3% Chrysotile H-01 Tile with Mastic and Leveling of Store L-5 5% Chrysotile Non -Friable Compound 1-01 2% Chrysotile 1-02 Gypsum Wallboard and Joint 7st and 2"d Floors Wall unit as a whole Friable 1-03 Compound contains < 1% Asbestos J-01 3'X2' Splined Ceiling Tiles 15 Floor - NW Comerof NO Friable Store K-01 CMU Block 1s Floor - NW Wali of NO Non -Friable Store L-01 L-02 Plaster and Skim Coat 16t Floor ND Friable L-03 M-01 Brown/Black 4" Cove Base and Vt Floor— NE Wall of NO Non -Friable Mastic Store N-01 Black Window Glazing 1s Floor— Non- Friable Front Entran0-01 NO Wood Pattern Wall Paper with 8t 1 Floor— Columns in 0-02 Texturing Mudd on Gypsum Main Store Areas NO Friable 0-03 Wallboard P-01 Fiberglass Batting Insulation Paper 1 s Floor - Storage NO Friable Q-01 9"X9" Red and Brown Vinyl Floor 1st Floor Storage L-1 5% Chrysotile Non-Frlabie Tile and Mastic L-2 3% Chrysotile R-01 1'X1' Tan Vinyl Floor Tile and 1s Floor — SE Storage NO Non -Friable Mastic Room Office S-01 4'X2' Drop-in Ceiling Tiles 15 Floor — SE Storage NO Friable Back Office U-01 Fiberglass Batting Insulation Paper 2" Floor— Men's Room NO Friable V-01 1'X1' White, S lined Ceiling Tiles 2" Floor— SE Office NO Friable W-01 Blue Carpet and White Vinyl Floor 2"d Floor — Men's Room NO Non -Friable Tile X-01 White Caulking Metal roof NO Non -Friable Z-01 Red Marbled Vinyl Floor Tile 2" Floor — Men's L-1 5% Chrysotile Non -Friable Room AA -01 Plaster on Wood Lath Apartments NO Friable BB -01 Vinyl Sheet Floorin2 Apartment #1 Kitchen NO Friable CC -01 White Sink Undercoating Apartment #1 Kitchen NO Non -Friable DD -01 Attic Insulation Attic NO Friable EE -01 Floral Vinyl Sheet Flooring Apartment #3 Kitchen NO Friable FF -01 FF -02 Texturing on Plaster Apartments NO Friable FF -03 GG -01 1'X1' Vin I Floor Tile Apartment #3 Bathroom NO Non -Friable HH -01 Brick and Mortar 3"X6 Apartments NO Non -Friable 11-02 Brick and Mortar Interlock Apartments NO Non -Friable JJ -01 Straight Run Thermal System 65% Chrysotile JJ -02 Insulation Attic Friable KK -07 Thermal System Insulation 15% Chrysotile KK -02 Elbows Attic 5%Amosite Friable KK -03 LL -01 Roof Window Glazing East Roof Window 2% Chrysotile Non -Friable Asbestos Sample 10 Materle Description i Location Friability Content LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 12 MM -01 Composite Roofing Material Roof ND Non -Friable NN -01 Air Vent Penetration Sealant Roof ND Non -Friable 00-01 Grey Roof Patching Material Roof 2% Chrysotile Non -Friable PP -01 Roof Window Glazing East Roof Window ND QQ-01 Caulking on Piping Roof ND Non -Friable RR -01 Black Penetration Sealant Roof ND Non -Friable SS -01 Black Roof Patching Material Roof ND Non -Friable TT -01 HVAC Penetration Sealant Roof ND Non -Friable UU-01 Lead Pipe Penetration Sealant Roof ND Non -Friable W-01 HVAC Putty Exterior of Store ND Non -Friable WW -01 Brick and Mortar North Side — Exterior of Building ND Non -Friable XX -01 Stucco on Cement North Side — Exterior of Building____ ND Friable YY -01 Stone Siding with Mortar Exterior of Building ND Friable ND — No Asbestos Detected LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 13 5.2 TCLP The result of the TCLP sample for the commercial building located at 510 South 3`6 Street in Renton, Washington was below the 5 mglL threshold for determination of the waste stream as hazardous with respect to lead. Therefore, the material from the demolition of this building may be disposed of as general demolition debris. 5.3 Mercury Light Tubes Five hundred and seven (507) 4' fluorescent light tubes were observed in the structure. 5.4 PCB Ballasts One hundred and thirty (130) ballasts which could potentially contain PCB's were observed in the structure_ 5.5 Exit Signs Two (2) exit signs that could potentially contain radioactive material were observed in the structure. 5.6 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's) Two (2) free standing refrigerators and one (1) drinking fountain with coolant fluids which could potentially contain CFC's were observed in the structure. Extreme caution should be used during any demolition activities to ensure that additional materials are not uncovered. This report should be presented to any contractor or subcontractor participating in renovation or demolition work at the commerciallresidential building located at 510 South 3rd Street in Renton, WA. In the event that additional materials are discovered, the material should be sampled and analyzed to determine if it contains asbestos prior to disturbance. 6.1 Asbestos Asbestos -containing materials are required to be removed and disposed of in accordance with Washington State Regulations prior to any demolition, renovation, or remodeling that would disturb these materials. Washington State Department of Labor and Industries and PSCAA require that the abatement be performed using Certified Asbestos Workers under the direct on-site supervision of a Certified Asbestos Supervisor. RGA recommends that a Certified Asbestos Project Designer design any asbestos abatement job to ensure that the job is completed according to regulation standards. 6.2 TCLP LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 14 The result of the TCLP sample for the commercial/residential building located at 510 south 3rd Street in Renton, Washington was below the 5 mg/L threshold for determination of the waste stream as hazardous with respect to lead. Therefore, the material from the demolition of this building may be disposed of as general demolition debris. 6.3 Mercury Light Tubes Five hundred and seven (507) 4' fluorescent light tubes were observed in the structure. These materials are required by both state and federal regulations to be removed prior to demolition activities. 6.4 PCB Ballasts One hundred and thirty (130) ballasts which could potentially contain PCB's were observed in the structure. These materials are required by both state and federal regulations to be removed prior to demolition activities. 6.5 Exit Signs Two (2) exit signs that could potentially contain radioactive material were observed in the structure. This material is required by both state and federal regulations to be removed prior to demolition activities. 6.6 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's) Two (2) free standing refrigerators and one (1) drinking fountain with coolant fluids which could potentially contain CFC's were observed in the structure. These coolant fluids are required by both state and federal regulations to be removed prior to demolition activities. This report does not represent all conditions at the subject site as it only reflects the information gathered from specific locations. RGA's observations and sampling included all accessible interior and exterior areas identified in the report. Observation or sampling of inaccessible areas such as within ductwork was not within the scope of RGA's work and was not performed. This report was prepared pursuant to the contract RGA has with the client. Unauthorized reliance on or use of this report, including any of its information or conclusions, will be at third party's risk. For the same reasons, no warranties or representations, expressed or implied in this report, are made to any such third party. Contact us at 206-281-8858 with any questions. LAND27664 haz mat Survey Final Report.doc 15 A 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 99101 u OFFICE: (20b) 2R1-ARSA FAX: ('Ob) 2R1-9922 email: lahoratory@rgaenv,com RG A =sem Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis ENVIRONMENTAL (EPA 600/R-93/116) I NVLAP LAA CODE 2006134) Landau Associates Project Location: 5 t 0 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 :Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) A-01 L -I No Asbestos Detected 100% Synthetic 11012920 Multi -color fibrous material L-2 No Asbestos Detected W16 Cotton 10% Mineral Particles Pink fibrous weave L-3 No Asbestos Detected 90% Resin and Binder Yellow adhesive 10% Mineral Particles L.-4 Red vinyl tile L-5 Black asphaltic material 1,6 Blue vinyl tile L-7 Black smooth rubbery material L -R Gray granular sandy material 5%Chrysotile No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected 75% Calcite Filler and Binder 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 5% Mineral Particles 65% Resin and Binder 25% Asphalt Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 75% Resin and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 75% Filler and Binder 15% Rubber Particles 10% Mineral Particles 65% Filler and Binder 25% Sand 10o/, Mineral Particles 'ntis r port relates tm ly to the kerns tested If samples are nut collectea by RGA PuVlranrnenEd perscmnel, uc vrecy of the result,, is limited by the niethuJulugy and expertise of the sample wlkcto, Analyses arc erruss- checW with other laburalu.io fur quality assurance purpuses This wputt shall not be reproduced except in full, without wrnten approval a€ RGA Envirunrttental tt ,shall nor be used to oEaim pwducr .,J,, -1 by NVLAP w any ether agrnry of the 115 Guvcnunent Sampled By: Emily Kahler :- Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/201 I Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/20/201 1 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/201 I Page I of 26 AL RG I _ 1inor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 OFFICE: (206) 381-8858 FAX: (206) 311 I-8922 email: laboratory[nlrgaenv.con llillh�g A ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 600/11-93/1.16) ECY Q NVLAP LAB CODE 200613-0 Landau Associates RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 -- --- ._. _........... ..... ... ..... . Re ort Ke Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) B-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 11012921 Brown smooth flexible material 750/6 Filler and Binder 150/. Rubber Particles 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected 750/6 Calcile Filler and Binder Gray soft crystalline material 150/6 Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles L-3 30/&Chrysotile 750/6 Filler and Binder Gray granular material 15°/4 Calcile Filler and Binder 7% Mineral Particles Lr4 No Asbestos Detected 90% Resin and Binder Tan adhesive 10% Mineral Particles L-5 59'oChrysotile 75% Calcite Filler and Binder Red vinyl the 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 5% Mineral Particles C-01 L-1 11012922 Blue vinyl the L-2 Clear adhesive No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected 75% Calcite Filler and Binder 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 90% Resin and Binder 10% Mineral Particles Tri+ report rclatcn utly [u the itemx tnsteJ If xwnples arc aut collected by RGA Environmental personnel. accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and expertise of the sample collector Analyses are cross- checkeJ with other luburaruries fur yuakiry asmrance purposes This repurr shall not be rcpuxlucmI except m full, without written approval of RGA Rn wonmemai It shall not be used to claim product cod—neot by NVLAP or any other agency of the U S Gsrvemmen[ Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 5I 1 /361. I Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/20f20I I Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5J20f201 I Page 2 of 26 1730 Minor Avenue. Suite 900, Seattle, WA 99101 OFFICE: (306) 281-8959 FAX: (306) 28 1-8922 email: laboratory@rgacnv.com d'il-RGA ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 1644/R-931116) NVLAP LAB CODE 2006134) Landau Associates Project Location: 510 Soutb 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Report Ke Client Sample 1D Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab TD Layer Description Components Components Components Laver Comments (if applicable) D-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 100% Synthetic 11012923 Multi -color fibrous material L-2 White fibrous weave L-3 Tan adhesive L4 Red vinyl the L-5 Tan adhesive L-6 White granular material No Asbestos Detected 100% Catton No Asbestos Detected 5%Chrysotlle No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected 90% Resin and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 750/6 Calcite Filler and Binder 1So/n Vinyl Filler and Binder 51/. Mineral Particles 90% Resin and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 65% Calcite Filler and Binder 250% Filler and Binder 100/6 Mineral Particles E-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 751% Rubber Particles 11012924 Dark smooth rubbery material 150/6 Filler and Binder 10°/o Mineral Particles G2 No Asbestos Detected 5% Talc 90% Resin and Binder Dark brown brittle mastic 5% Mineral Particles L-3 Tan adhesive No Asbestos Detected 90% Resin and Binder 100% Mineral Particles 7h is report Mares only to the items tested If sanples are not collected by RGA Euvinmmental personnel, accuracy of the results is Ibnited by the methodoluiy and expertise of the sample coltectur Analyses arc cross- checked with other laburaturies for quality assurance purposes -his report shall not be repruduced except in full, without u"ucn approval of RGA Environmental rt shall nut be used w claim product endorscmenr by NVLAPoranyotheraxencyofthe US Guvemment Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/201 1 - Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/20/2011 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/2011 Page 3 of 26 1 , _ . dinor Avenue, Suite 9tH1, Seattle, WA 991 Ol RGAOFFICE: (206) 291-8X58 FAX: (206) 281-8922 email: laboratoryrVr rgaenv.c0m Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis ENVIRONMENTAL (EPA 600/R-931116) I NVLAP LAB CODE 260613-0 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Report Ke Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) F-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 11012925 Blue rubbery material L-2 Opaque adhesive No Asbestos Detected 7511 Rubber Particles 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 90% Resin and Binder 10%a Mineral Particles Thi; repurt relates oily to the items tested If samples are not collected by RGA Envirournental personnel, accuracy of the resuhs is limited by the melhodulogy mid expenise of the sample collector Analyses arc l ss- checkal with other laburxuricr for quality arsu—cc purposes Tliis r To L shall not be reproduced cxLvpl in full, wid1ou[ wnurn approval uPRGA Envirunmrnlal It.+bxll no( bn used to clam+ pruduc[ endursensenl by NVLAP ur any tither agency ofthe US Guvemmenl Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12120t 1 _...._. Reviewed By; Aruna Turaga 5/20/2011 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 512OP01 I Page of 26 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 OFFICE: (206) 291-8858 F-AX: (306) 281.8922 email:_ totboratory@rgaenv.com rgaenv.corrf dbi&-RGA Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis aeda�� E N V I R O N M E N T A L (EPA 600/R-93/ 116) I NVLAP LAB CODE 2006134) Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Report Kev Client Sample ID Layer 0 (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) G-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 751/. Calcite Filler and Binder 11012926 Brown vinyl tile w/ streaks 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 1:2 No Asbestos Detected 90% Resin and Binder Clear adhesive 10% Mineral Particles L-3 No Asbestos Detected 901/. Resin and Binder Tan adhesive 10% Mineral Particles L-4 No Asbestos Detected 75% Calcite Filler and Binder Tan vinyl tile 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles L-5 3% Chrysotile 909/. Asphalt Filler and Binder Black asphaltic material 7% Mineral Particles L-6 5% Chrysotile 75% Calcite Filler and Binder Dark red vinyl lite 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 5% Mineral Particles L-7 3% Chrysotile 90% Asphalt Filler and Binder Black asphaltic material 7% Mineral Particles L -R No Asbestos Detected 75% Vinyl Filler and Binder Gray vinyl sheet 15% Calcite Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles L-9 No Asbestos Detected 90% Resin and Binder Clear adhesive 100/6 Mineral Particles Thi: rcporl relates only to zhe Reins tested rf samples are not colkcted by RGA Environmental personnel, accuracy ofthe results is limitcd by the mcthorlolog and expernw of the sample cullectur Auaiyaea an, ,russ- ehecked wide other taboraroriea for quality u.umrwue purposo This rcpurt shall not be wproduocd e:ccpt in Full, wilhuut wriuen approval of RGA Environmental rt shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency urthe U S Guvermnnet Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/01 1 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5120!01 1 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/2011 Page 5 of 26 I r_ 4inor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 OFFICE: (206) 281-8858 FAX: (206) 281-8922 email: laboratory@rgaenv.com,A�RGA ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 6001R-43/116) NVLAP LAB CODE 200613-0 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Report Key Tient Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Wort -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous .GA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) H-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 75% Calcite Filler and Binder 11012927 Brown vinyl tile w/ streak 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 10 Mineral Particles L-2 Tan adhesive L-3 Tan vinyl tile L-4 Slack asphaltic material L-5 Dark red vinyl file No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected 3% Chrysotile 5%Chrysotile 90% Resin and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 75% Calcite Filler and Binder 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 90% Asphalt Filler and Binder 7% Mineral Particles 75% Calcite Filler and Binder 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 5% Mineral Particles This report relates wily to the items tested If samples are not colkcted by RGA Environmental personnel, wcurwy of the resuhs is limited by the methudolu" and expertise of the sample colle�Aor Analyser arc cross- checked with other labomtones for quality assurance purposes This report shall nut be reproduced except in full, without written upprovat of RGA Environmental Tr shall not be used to claim prodvet cndor. nrcm by NVLAP or Any other agency of the u 5 Govcmment Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 511 2120 1 1 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/201201 I Analyzed By_ Minh Huynh 5120112011 page 6 of 26 1736 Minor Avenue, Suite 940, Seattle, WA 98 101 OFFICE: (206) 281-8858 FAX: (246) 281-8922 email: laboratotyOrgaeav_com 011h�gRGA Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis ENVIRONMENTAL (EPA 600/R-931116) I NVLAP LAB CODE -100613-0 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Client Sample 11D Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab rD Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) 1-01 Lr1 No Asbestos Detected H012928 Blue paint L-2 20/,Chrysotlle Beige crystalline material Layer Comments: The wall unit, as a whole, contain <1 % Chrysotile asbestos. L-3 No Asbestos Detected 75% Cellulose White fibrous papery material L-4 No Asbestos Detected 750/. Cellulose Tan fibrous papery material L-5 No Asbestos Detected 15% Glass Fiber White powdery blocky material 80% Paint 100/4 Mineral Particles 651/6 Calcite Filler and Binder 13% Mineral Particles 150/6 t=iller and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Parlicles 650/6 Gypsum Filler and Binder" 104/4 Calcite Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles Tli is report relates only to the item% tested If samples are nut collected by RGA Envirunmenrad per. nnel, accuracy of the resulrs is limited by rhe methodulopy and erpenixc of the .ample collccror A—lyses are xos checked with other laboratories Fur quality nasurancc purpunen This -purl shall nut be reproduced except in full, wnboul wriuen approval ofRGA Fnvironmemal It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or=ury olhcr agency of thr U 5 Govnmmrnl Sampled By: Emily Kahler 1= ' Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/2011 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 512OP01 t Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5M 20I I page 7 of 26 17_ Avenue, Suite 90f}, Seattle- WA 98101 n� n (7FFTCEF.i (2 (3fS(t) 291-9858 FAX; (306) 381-9933 cmaii; laborstory@rgaenv.contRGA E N V i RC) N M N TA I_ Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis mrLArLaBcoDE2t1(}bt3-0 {EPA 600IR-93/1.16} Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 This report relates only to the items tested tf eemples are nor w,llecred by RGA Ervironinrurul personnel, accura'y of the results u limited by the mcrhudulaey and expertise of the sarnple wllewur Analyses are uuss- cixched with other laboratories for quality assurance purposes This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of ROA Environmental It shall not he used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the C S Government Sampled By_ Emily Kahler l' - Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/301 I Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5121}1201 I Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5J2{}/201 t Page 8 of 26 Report lie ;Client Sample ID Layer 1D (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) I-02 L I No Asbestos Detected 90% Paint 11012929 Blue paint 10% Mineral Particles L-2 2"%oChrysatile 85% Calcite Filler and Binder Beige crystalline material 13% Mineral Particles Dyer Comments: The wall unit, as a whole, contain <1 % Chrysotile asbestos. L-3 No Asbestos Detected 75°% Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder White fibrous papery material 10% Mineral Particles L-4 No Asbestos Detected 750/6 Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder Tan Fibrous papery material 10% Mineral Particles L-5 No Asbestos Detected 15% Glass Fiber 65% Gypsum Filler and Binder White powdery blocky material 10% Calcite Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles This report relates only to the items tested tf eemples are nor w,llecred by RGA Ervironinrurul personnel, accura'y of the results u limited by the mcrhudulaey and expertise of the sarnple wllewur Analyses are uuss- cixched with other laboratories for quality assurance purposes This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of ROA Environmental It shall not he used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the C S Government Sampled By_ Emily Kahler l' - Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/301 I Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5121}1201 I Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5J2{}/201 t Page 8 of 26 A RG 173{} Minor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 OFFICE: (206) 281-8858 FAX: (206) 281-8922 email: laboratory@rgaenv.com Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis addax ENVIRONMENTAL (EPA 600/R-93/116) I NVLAP LAB CODE 200613-0 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Report Key (Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab TD Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) I-03 1-1 No Asbestos Detected 11012930 Blur paint 90% Paint 10% Mineral Particles L-2 20/a Chrysotlle 85% Calcite Filler and Binder Beige crystalline material 130/. Mineral Particles Layer Comments: The wall unit, as a whole, contain <1 % Chrysotile asbestos. L-3 No Asbestos Detected 751/. Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder White fibrous papery material 10% Mineral Particles L-4 No Asbestos Detected 750/6 Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder Tan fibrous papery material 10% Mineral Particles L-5 No Asbestos Detected 150/6 Glass Fiber 65% Gypsum Filler and Binder White powdery blocky material 10% Calcite Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles J-01 L-1 11012931 Beige paint L? Tan fibrous material No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected 90'/6 Cellulose 85% Paint 15% Mineral Particles 10°/ Mineral Particles K-01 White granular sandy material No Asbestos Detected 651/. Filler and Binder 11012932 25% Sand 10% Mineral Particles L-01 White granular sandy material No Asbestos Detected 65% Filler and Binder 11012933 25% Sand 10% Mineral Particles T1rk rcysrt rclures only N the �[rms Icsred if sampler :uc nu[ colleted by RGA �uvirunnrcutal pen.unnd, accuracy of the msul[s ix Gmilnd by [he rnclhudulugy and experriye ur rhe sausple cullecNr Analy.ea are yracs- checked with other laburamnes For quality assurance purposex 'this repun shall not he reproduce) exeepr in full, withuur wruten approval of RGA Fnviroumenral It shall not be used to claim product endo rumen[ by NVLAP ur any other agency uhhe U S C vemwerst Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/201 l Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5120/?ll I 1 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/201 t Page 9 of 26 1, _ . 4inor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 99101 OFFICE: (306) 281-8858 FAX; {206} 281-8922 email; laboratnry(a7rgaenv,cam RGA ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 6001R-931116) I NVI.AP LAB CODE 200613-0 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South _3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) L-02 White granular sandy material No Asbestos Detected 11012934 L-03 White granular sandy material No Asbestos Detected tlO12935 65% Filler and Binder 25% Sand 10% Mineral Particles 65% Filler and Binder 25% Sand 10% Mineral Particles M-01 L -t No Asbestos Detected 75% Rubber Particles 11012936 Dark bmwn smooth rubbery material 150/6 Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected Dark brown brittle mastic L-3 No Asbestos Detected White crystalline material N-01 Black smmh sealant material No Asbestos Detected 11012937 90616 Resin and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 85% Calcite Filler and Binder 15% Mineral Particles 75% Filler and Binder 15% Rubber Particles 10% Mineral Particles Thu, report rclutes Ur IY to [hc hems aired If .sa,nplcs arc not cull« -ted by RGA Environ inental pe nnA, accuracy of the resuhs is limited by the methodoloity and ezpenise of the sample collector Analyses arc cross- checked wilt other laboraturies for quality awsurance purposes This report shall not be sepruduced except in full, without written approval of RGA Eovinnnnental It shall nut be used to ela,ra product undunemCnr by IW LAP or any other agency of the U S Govenrment Sampled By: Emily Kahlerl' Received By: Aruna Turaga 51121'101 Reviewed By: Antna Turaga 5!201201 1 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5f20/201 l Page 10 of 26 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 940, Seattle, WA 98 101 OFFICE: (706) 2ft1-9858 FAX: (206) 291-8922 email: ]ahorarory@rgaenv.c dbW&RGA ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 6001R-931116) n NVLAP LAB CODE 200613-0 Landau Associates RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Re ort -Key Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) 0-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 100% Cotton I t012938 white fibrous weave L-2 No Asbestos Detected 90% Resin and Binder Tan adhesive 10% Mineral Particles L-3 No Asbestos Detected 85% Calcite Filler and Binder White crystalline material 15% Mineral Particles L-4 No Asbestos Detected 90% Paint White paint 10% Mineral Particles 0-02 L-1 11012939 White fibrous weave L-2 Tan adhesive No Asbestos Detected 100% Cotton No Asbestos Detected 900/. Resin and Binder 10% Mineral Particles L-3 No Asbestos Detected 85% Calcite Filler and Binder White crystalline material 15% Mineral Particles L-4 No Asbestos Detected 90% Paint White paint 101% Mineral Particles This rep wt relates only to the items reseed tf samples are nut collected by RGA Environmental perstnwel, accuracy uF the results is IimiIcd by dm meth.doluey and uxpo tisr of 0w s rpI, collector Analyses are uoss- chcckcd with uthcr laboratories for quality assurance purposes This report shall not be reproduced es rpt in full, without wrinen appruval of RGA Envimnmenrai I ,hall nut be used I., I. i. product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U S Government Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/120011 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5I2o/2oI I Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5122Oj20I I Page I 1 of 26 I - . Ainor Avenue, Suite 900. Seattle, WA 99101 OFFICE: (206) 291-8858 FAX: (206) 281-8922 email: laboratory@rgaenv.com ZRGA Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis E N V I R O N M E N T A L (FPA 600/R-931116) NVLAP LAB CODE 200613-0 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 iClient Sample ID Layer TD (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Nam -Fibrous RGA Lab 1D Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) 0-43 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 100% Cotton 11012940 White fibrous weave L-2 No Asbestos Detected 90% Resin and Binder Tan adhesive 10% Mineral Particles L-3 No Asbestos Detected 85% Calcite Filler and Binder White crystalline material L-4 White paint No Asbestos Detected P-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 65% Cellulose 11012941 Tan fibrous papery material w/ silver coating 1-2 Yellow fibrous material ()-01 L-1 11012942 Dark red vinyl tile L-2 Black asphaltic material Lr3 Black granular sandy material No Asbestos Detected 100% Glass F ber 5%Chrysotile 3%Chrysotile No Asbestos Detected 15% Mineral Particles 90% Paint 10% Mineral Particles 25% Foil 100/6 Mineral Particles 751/. Calcite Filler and Binder 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 5% Mineral Particles 90% Asphalt Filler and Binder 7%, Mineral Particles 65% Filler and Binder 150/6 Resin and Binder 15% Sand 100/6 Mineral Particles 'the. report rctatra only to the items tested Ifsamples are nut collected by RGA Ervironnioual personal, accuracy of the mwlts ii limited by the methodology and expertise of the sample culledur Analysts arc truss - checked with other tabur.turies for quality assurascc purposes This report shall nut be reproduced except in full, without written approval of RGA Euvirunrnentul It shall scut be used to etaint product endun:errteru by NVLAP or any usher agency of the U S Govemmcut Sampled By: Emily Kahlerjt Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/201 l -- -- Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/20/201 l Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/2011 page 12 of 26 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 900. Seattle, WA 98101 OFFICE: (206) 291-8958 FAX: (206) 281-8922 email: laboratory@rgaenv.com d~fbqi'0-'6RGA --. Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis ENVIRONMENTAL (FPA 600/R-931116) I NVLAP LAB CODE 200613-4 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) 1-04 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 850/6 Calcite Filler and Binder 11012945 White crystalline material 15% Mineral Particles L-2 White fibrous papery material No Asbestos Detected 751/. Cellulase 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles L-3 No Asbestos Detected 75% Cellulose R-01 1, 1 No Asbestos Detected 10% Mineral Particles 90% Resin and Binder 11012943 White resin White powdery blocky material Aruna Turaga 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected 5/20/2011 55% Filler and Binder White sheeting material 35% Plastic Particles 10% Mineral Particles L-3 No Asbestos Detected 750% Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder White vinyl tile 10% Mineral Particles S-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 90% Paint 11012944 White paint 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected 45% Cellulase 20% Perlite Tan fibrous material 25% Mineral Wool 10% Mineral Particles 1-04 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 850/6 Calcite Filler and Binder 11012945 White crystalline material 15% Mineral Particles L-2 White fibrous papery material No Asbestos Detected 751/. Cellulase 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles L-3 No Asbestos Detected 75% Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder Tan fibrous papery material 10% Mineral Particles L- No Asbestos Detected 15% Glass Fiber 65% Gypsum Filler and Binder White powdery blocky material Aruna Turaga 10% Calcite Filler and Binder Reviewed By: 10% Mineral Particles T}t iti report relates un ly w the items textcd if samples arc nut collected by RGA nwinmmcnml personnel, accuracy of the results k limited by the methodology anti expertise of the sample collectur Analy.ca are Iry - chmkcd with other laboratories For quality —uranre purposes Tt is repon shall not be reproduced except in full. without written approval of RGA Environmental tt shall nut be used to Tenn product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the tl S Govemment Sampled By: Emily Kahler <l^ Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/2411— Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/20/2011 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/2011 Page 13 of 26 At 17- inor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle. WA 98101 OFFICE: (206) 281-8859 FAX; (206) 281-8922 entail: laboratory@rgaenv.com dbW&RGA Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis HV A E N V I R O N M E N T A L (EPA 6001R-931116) I NVLAP LAB CODE 200613-0 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab 1"D Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) I -p5 L-1 11012946 White crystalline material L-2 White fibrous papery material L-3 Tan fibrous papery material L-4 White powdery blocky material I-46 L-1 11012947 White crystalline material L-2 White fibrous papery material L-3 Tan fibrous papery material L-4 White powdery blocky material No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected 75% Cellulose No Asbestos Detected 751/6 Cellulose No Asbestos Detected 150/6 Glass Fiber No Asbestos Detected 85% Calcite Filler and Binder 15% Mineral Particles 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 65% Gypsum Filler and Binder 10% Calcite Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 851/. Calcite Filler and Binder 150/6 Mineral Particles No Asbestos Detected 75% Cellulose 1 So/u Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles No Asbestos Detected 75% Cellulose No Asbestos Detected 151/e Glass Fiber 15%v Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 65% Gypsum Filler and Binder 10% Calcite Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles Tr is rcpwi relates ur ly lu the Reins tested lfsamples are nut collected by RCA Euvit»nmellw per-nnd, accumey of the msulrs is roniwd by the rocthodulogy and cspertix orthe sample collector Analyser arc cross- ctt *c i with udier luborai—s fur quahry mstuance Purp0a Ttra re Port shall not be reproduced except in full, whhout written approval of RGA Environmental It xhall not be used m claire product endorsement by NVLAP or Any urher agency of rhe 0 S Govm—ent Sampled By: Emily Kahler F t= Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/2011 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5t-)0/2011 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/201[ Page 14 of 26 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 OFFICE: (206) 281-8858 _FAX: (206) 281-8922 email: labol~atotyCilrgaenv,cam dhim-ORGA Bk Asbestos Fiber Analysis aedca� ENVIRONMENTAL (EPA 600/R-93/116) I NVI,AP LAB CODF. 200613-0 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Report Ke Client Sample I D Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) 1_07 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 85% Calcite Filler and Binder 11012948 White crystalline material 15% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected 75% Cellulose 150/. Filler and Binder White fibrous papery material 10% Mineral Particles L-3 No Asbestos Detected 751/. Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder Tan fibrous papery material 10% Mineral Particles L4 No Asbestos Detected 150/6 Glass Fiber 65% Gypsum Filler and Binder White powdery blocky material 10% Calcite Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles U-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 750/6 Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder I t012949 Tan paint 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected Black asphaltic material L-3 No Asbestos Detected 100% Glass F ber Yellow fibrous material 90% AsphaN Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles V-02 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 90% Paint 1 t012950 White paint 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected 75% Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder Tan fibrous papery material 10% Mineral Particles Thi,repot rclatea udy to the acmc tested If samples are pmt collected by RGA Fnvironrmental personnel, accurucy of lhC result- is limited by rhe mclhoduloey and expenise of the sample collector Analyzes arc ross- checked with orhrr Inbumtories for quality assurance purposes This rcpon .shall not he repmdueed except in full, without written approval of RGA Environmental it shall nut be used to claim pruduct eadursement by NVLAP or any other agm,y of rhe tJ S Guvtimment Sampled By: Emily Kahler 1— Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12f201 I Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/?0C-'()11 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5I1-0/2011 Page 15 of 26 I _ I finor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98141 OFFfCE: (206) 281-8858 FAX: (206) 281-8922 email: laboratory@rgaenv,com R A — Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis aw'% E N V I R O N M E N T A L (EPA 600/R-931116) NVLAP LAB CODE 200613-0 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Report Ke Client Sample ID Layer FD (if applicable) Asbestos Nan -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab TD layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) W-01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 100% Synthetic 11012951 Multi -color fibrous material L-2 No Asbestos Detected 100% Cotton White Fibrous weave L-3 Gray vinyl tile L-4 Black resin L-5 3 cylindrical blocks of wood No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected 75% Calcite Filter and Binder 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 65% Resin and Binder 25% Asphalt Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 100% Wood X_01 is 1 No Asbestos Detected 750/. Resin and Binder 11012952 White smooth sealant material 150/6 Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected White paint 90% Paint 10% Mineral Particles Thi« report relates only to the items tested If swnples arc nu[ culketed by RCA Environmental persmmel, occur y of the remlrs is limited by the rnelhodulogy and expertise of the swpk cullectur Analy.es are cro. - Owckecl with other labraturies for quality an.+urmrec purpuaes Tbis report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval ofRGA Environrnental It shall not be uxed m claim product endors lint by WLAP ur any u[her uerncy of the C 5 Government Sampled By: Emily Kahler i1r Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/1 2P201 I Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/20/201 1 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5120J201 l Pagc 16 of 26 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98 101 OFFICE: (206) 281-8858 FAX: (206) 281-8922 email: laboratory@rgacnv,com dhaIRGA ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 600IR-93/l 16) TV Vt.AY LAB CODE 200613-0 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 ,Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) Z-01 L-1 11012953 Dark red vinyl file L-2 Black resin 5%Chrysatile No Asbestos Detected L-3 No Asbestos Detected 3 cylindrical blocks of wood AA -01 L-1 11012954 Beige paint No Asbestos Detected L-2 No Asbestos Detected White granular sandy material AA -02, L-1 11012955 Green paint No Asbestos Detected L-2 No Asbestos Detected White granular sandy material 75% Calcite Filler and Binder 15% Vinyl Filler and Binder 5% Mineral Particles 65% Resin and Binder 25% Asphalt Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 100% Wood 90% Paint 10% Mineral Particles 65% Filler and Binder 25% Sand 10% Mineral Particles 90% Paint 10% Mineral Particles 65% Filler and Binder 25% Sand 10% Mineral Particles AA -03 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 90% Paint 1 l O 12956 Red paint 10% Mineral Particles L-2 White granular sandy material No Asbestos Detected 650/6 Filler and Binder 25%, Sand 10% Mineral Particles T1r1s repwt relates u, ty to the items tested if samples are nur culkcted by RGA Envinrnmental personnel, accuracy of the msuks is limited by the methodology and expenisa of the iatnpk collector Analyses arc -- checked with other laboratories for quality asiurance purposes This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without annen approval of RGA Emiro nerttal It shall nur be used ru W. pwdua en lo—meni by MVLAP or any other agency of the U S Government Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/1212011 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/20120 i 1 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20P'-01 1 Page 17 of 26 AL1 j-. inor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 9810 1 aRGAOFFICE; (206)281-9859FAX: (2156) 2111-8922 email; lalforatory(t7rrgaenv-com Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis HW A E N V I R O N M E N T A L (EPA 600111-931116) I WVLAP LAB CODE 20061340 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Client Sample 1D Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab YD Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) AA -04 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 90%4 Paint 11012957 Tan paint 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected 65% Filler and Binder While granular sandy material 25% Sand 101/. Mineral Particles AA -05 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 90% Paint 11012958 Tan paint 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected 65% Filler and Binder White granular sandy material 25% Sand 10% Mineral Particles AA -06 L -I No Asbestos Detected 90% Paint 11012959 Orce" paint 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected White granular sandy material 65% Filler and Binder 25% Sand 10% Mineral Particles AA -07 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 90% Paint 11012960 Green paint 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected White granular sandy material 65% Filler and Binder 251/6 Sand 10%t, Mineral Particles This report telues only w the items tested if.imnpks ore not colkcad by RGA Environmental personnel, accurwy of the results is limited by the rnelhodology and expertise of the sample collector Analyses an truss - checked with other laboratories for quality assumnce purposes Tris report shall not be reproduced eX—Pt in full, without wruren rpproval of RGA £nvironmental ft shall not be used to claim product endor meat by NVI,AP or any utb, agency of the U 5 Guvemment Sampled By: Emily Kahler l= Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/"-'01 1 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/20/201 1 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/'101 1 Page 18 of 26 RG 11111 Minor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA III III OFFICE: (206) 281-8858 FAX: (246) 281-8922 email: lahoratory@rRaenv-com A.. Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis aeda ENVIRONMENTAL (FPA 60018-93/116) I NVLAPLA13 CODE 2406134) Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St lient Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) GA Lab 1D Layer Description Layer Comments (if applicable) BB -01 L-1 t 1012961 Brown sheet vinyl tile material L-2 Brown fibrous material L-3 Black asphaltic material RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous Components Components Components No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected 85% Cellulose No Asbestos Detected 650/6 Plastic Particles 151/6 Vinyl Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 1171/6 Filler and Binder 150/6 Filler and Binder 65% Asphalt Filler and Binder 150% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 10% Resin and Binder Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterrnan, not the analyst listed at the botium of the report. CC -01 White crystalline material No Asbestos Detected 650% Calcite Filler and Binder 11012962 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 10% Sand Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. DD -01 Black fibrous material No Asbestos Detected 850/6 Glass Fiber 15% Filler and Binder 11012963 Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst 1 isted at the bottom of the report. This repurl rctalex ally w the iiernx IeslcJ If sa+nplca are not collected by RGA Envinuntncnlal personnel, accuracy of the msults is limited by the methodningy and expern.se of the sarnple collector Analyses arc ausx- chcc4d wid, od+cr labour a Tics for quality assurance purposes 'nils repon shall not be reproduced except in full. without writtrn approval of RGA Environmental It shall not be tn,d to cla@n proJuct endorsemenr by NVI,AP or any other ;rgcncy of [he U 5 Govemmenr Sampled By: Emily Kahler ' Received 13y: Aruna Turaga SIl2/241 1 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5120/2011 Analyzed By_ Minh Huynh 5/20/201 1 Page 19 of 26 I' - iinor Avcnue, Suite 9110, Seattle, WA 99101 GA OFFICE: (206) 291-8859 FAX: (206) 291-9922 email: laboratory@rgaenv.com ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 600/R-931116) I NVLAP LAB CODE 2006134) Ky A Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Report Key Client Sample 1D Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab TD Layer Description Components Components Components 1 Layer Comments (if applicable) EE -01 IA 11012964 Brown paint L-2 Black asphaltic fibrous material No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected 75% Cellulose L-3 No Asbestos Detected Gray plastic material 100% Paint 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 85% Plastic Particles. 15% Filler and Binder Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst l isted at the bottum of the report. FF -01 Layered paint No Asbestos Detected 100% Paint 11012965 Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. FF -02 Layered paint No Asbestos Detected 100% Paint 11012966 Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. FF -03 Layered paint No Asbestos Detected 100% Paint 11012967 Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. Thn report ivlares only at ncc irons tesaed if samples are not cutlroed by RCA Eavimmnaenaal perswincl, accuracy of the rerul[s is lenited by the inelhudoloby and expertise of the sample tullrrlur Analyses an checked with other laboratories fur yuattty assurance purposes This report shall not ba reproduced except in full, without written approval of RGA D• tvironmental It shall not be used to claim product endontemeu[ by NVLAP or any uthrr agency of the U 5 Government Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/1x12 1 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/26r01 1 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/26/201 1 Page 20 of 26 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 940, Seattle, WA 98101 Awkwo OFFICE: (206) 281-8958 FAX: (206) 291-9922 email: lahoratory@rgaenv.com 11102ORGA ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 600/R-93/116) Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St NVLAP LAB CODE 200613-0 RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Ree2rt Key ----i-u--r rn r�iar riirrr r Tient Sample ID Layer 0 (if applicable) Asbestos Nan -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous ZGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) GG -01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 65% Vinyl Filler and Binder 11012968 Beige vinyl file matenal 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 10% Resin and Binder L-2 No Asbestos Detected Black rubbery material Lr3 No Asbestos Detected Tan crystalline material 750/6 Rubber Particles 150/6 Filler and Binder 10% Resin and Binder 751% Calcite Filler and Binder 15°1 Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. HH -01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 650/6 Clay Filler and Binder 11012969 Red granular material 251/6 Sand 10% Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected 650% Filler and Binder Gray granular material 20% Sand 150/6 Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. 1I-02 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 650/6 Clay Filler and Binder 11012970 Red granular material 250/6 Sand 100/6 Mineral Particles L-2 No Asbestos Detected 65% Filler and Binder Gray granular material 20% Sand 150/6 Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. Tli is repurt Niatts unty lu the items lestA Tf samples are not culhxttd by RGA E.avironmerual personnel, accuracy of the resuhs is Nin iled by the mtrhodulugy and expartkw of the sample oullec[ur Analyxex arc �suxs- chrcked wish usher labora[urirs fur yualgy asaUra:rce purposes Thi- report shall not be reproduced except in full, withuu; wnnrn approval ofRGA Envirorrmen[ai Tr shall not be used ro claim product endorsernenr by WLAP or any other agency of the C S Govemino,1 Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 5112/2011 ------ - Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5P-0/2011 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5MI201 l Page 21 of 26 I _ inor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 OFFICE: FAX: �RA ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 600/R-93/116) Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St 0 INV Q NVLAP LAB CODE 20061 1-0 RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab ID Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) JJ -01 Gray papery material with white 65%Chrysotile 10% Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder 11012971 fibrous material 10% Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the hottom of the report. JJ -02 Gray papery material with white 650/oChrysotile 10% Cellulose 15% Filler and Binder 11012972 fibrous material 10% Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report, KK -01 White crystalline material with white 15%Chrysotile 65% Calcite Filler and Binder 11012974 and brown fbrousmaterial 5%Arnosite 100/6 Mineral Particles 51% Filler and Binder Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst 1 isted at the bottom of the report. KK -02 White crystalline material with white 15%Chrysotile 65% Calcite Filler and Binder 11012975 and brown fibrous mateiml 5%Amosite 10% Filler and Binder 5% Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst I isted at the bottom of the report. KK -03 White crystalline material with white 159'. Chrysotile 65% Calcite Filler and Binder 11012976 and brown fibrous mateiral 5%Amosite 10% Mineral Particles 5% Filler and Binder Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst 1 isted at the bottom of the report. LL -01 Hard gray crystalline material 2%Chrysotile 750/6 Calcite Filler and Binder 11012977 150% Filler and Binder 80/ Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quanerman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. Tr i61 reporl relates wily to the items tested If samples are not colkcted by RGA Environmental personnel, accuracy ofthe msultx is limited by the methodology and expenke of the wnple cull—t— Analyses are cross- checked widt alter lahomiuries for ryUaliry assurwrce purposes ibis report shall nut be repruduced except in full, withaut written approval ofRGA Envhonrnental It shall nol be used to clairn product endursemeni by NVLAP or any orher agency of the ll S Government Sampled By; Emily Kahler Fl Received By: Aruna Turaga 5112(201 I Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5P-012011 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/2011 Page 22 of 26 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 OFFICE: (2061281-8858 FAX: (206) 281-8922 email: laboratoryit rgacnv.com MEORGA ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 600/R-93!116) Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St K W % NVt_AP LAB CODE 200613-0 RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Client Sample ID Layer 1D (if applicable) Asbestos Nan -Asbestos. Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab TD Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) MM -01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 100% Paint 11012978 Silver paint 1-2 No Asbestos Detected Black asphaltic material 65% Asphalt Filler and Binder 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 10% Resin and Binder L-3 No Asbestos Detected 851/. Glass Fiber 1So/u Filler and Binder Brown fibrous material L-4 No Asbestos Detected Shiny black asphaltic material 65% Asphalt Filler and Binder 15% Filler and Binder 101% Mineral Particles 10% Resin and Binder Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. NN -01 Black asphaltic mastic with white No Asbestos Detected 10% Cellulose 65% Asphalt Filler and Binder 11012979 rocks 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst 1 isted at the bottom of the report. 00-01 Black fibrous asphaltic material with 20/.Chrysotile 10% Cellulose 65% Asphalt Filler and Binder 11012980 while fibers 15% Filler and Binder So/ Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. PP -01 Black asphaltic material No Asbestos Detected 750% Asphalt Filler and Binder 11012981 150/6 Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. Ihn repot[ ealaes ally to the items tes ed If samples are nut collected by RGA Envirorinn— l }w—oncl, —ti acy of the result" k limited by the mechodulogy and expertise of the sample cullecsur Analyses am crm, checked with other laburduricc for yuulily assurance purposca This rrpor ,shall not he reproduced except in full, wnhout written approval of RGA Envinmmeitial It shall out be used to claim produu endorsement by NVLAI' or any uther agency of the U 5 Govcrnrnent Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga S/1212ot i Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/20/2011 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/201 t Page 23 of 26 AtI _ inor Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 As RGA C)FFTCF.: (206) 291-9959 FAX; (206) 281-9922 email: laboratur-y@rgaetiv.com ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 600/R-43/116) Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St It Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Lab ID Layer Description Components Layer Comments (if applicable) QQ-q1 Gray adhesive material No Asbestos Detected 65% Glue and Glue Fillers 11012982 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 10% Resin and Binder KV L N'VLAP LAB CODE 200613-0 RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous Components Components Note: This sampie was analyzed by Matthew Quanerman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. RR -01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 65%. Asphalt Filler and Binder 11012983 Black asphaltic material with white 15% Filler and Binder rocks 10g/6 Mineral Particles 5'/6 Resin and Binder 5% Rocks L-2 No Asbestos Detected 651/. Cellulose 20% Asphalt Filler and Binder Black fibrous asphaltic material 15% Mineral Particles L-3 Black shiny asphaltic material L-4 Black fibrous asphaltic material No Asbestos Detected No Asbestos Detected 65% Cellulose 65% Asphalt Filler and Binder 20% Resin and Binder 15% Mineral Particles 20% Asphalt Filler and Binder 15% Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarierman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. SS -01 Black fibrous asphalt ic material No Asbestos Detected 65% Cellulose 20% Asphalt Filler and Binder 11012984 15% Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. TT -01 Sort black asphaltic material No Asbestos Detected 75%, Asphalt Filler and Binder 11012985 150/6 Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report, lhis rcpttrt relates Only to the items tested rf samples are not cOr.icd by RGA &tviwnmrntal prr,.uunrl, a,wrmy or the results ix Ibnited by the methodology and expenise of the sample callecior Analyses ate cross- uhcekcd with other labumtuoes sur quality assurance purposes Tlt is %pon shall not be reproduced except in full, widwur WFuEen approval of RCiA F.nviruo,nentai It shall not be used to claim product endursement by W LAP ur any utha uyrncy of the G 5 Guvemmem Sampled By: Emily Kahler 1 Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/201 I -- Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5120/201 I Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5/20/201 1 Page 24 of 26 Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St Client Sample YD Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos RGA Lab fD Layer Description Components Layer Comments (if applicable) mw '% NVLAP LAB CODE 240613-0 RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous Components Components UU-01 Black asphaltic material No Asbestos Detected 5% Cellulose 11012986 751/ Asphalt Filler and Binder 150/6 Filler and Binder 50/6 Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quartcrman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. VV -01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 65% Glue and Glue Fillers 11012987 Beige mastic 15% Filler and Binder 100/6 Mineral Particles 101% Resin and Binder Lr2 No Asbestos Detected Gray adhesive material 65% Glue and Glue Fillers 15% Filler and Binder 10% Mineral Particles 10% Resin and Binder Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quanennan, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report, WW -01 L- I No Asbestos Detected 100% Paint 11012988 Beige paint L-2 No Asbestos Detected Dark red granular material L-3 No Asbestos Detected Gray granular material Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report. 65% Clay Filler and Binder 25°! Sand 10% Mineral Particles 65% Filler and Binder 20% Stand 15% Mineral Particles Th is report relates wly to the nems tested If samples arc not collected by RGA Envinmimemal perwnnel. atxuracy of the results k Inn ited by the methoduloey stud expcnisc of the sample wllrx:wr Anelyse, arc cms,- checked with uth cr laboratories fur yuulily a vancc purposes Ti i, rcpun,hail nut be reproduced except in full, without wrmen approval of RGA Fasvi"imental It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agoi y of the U 5 Gowmrncnt Sampled By: Emily Kahler Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/2011 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/2012011 Analyzed By: Minh Huynh 5120/241 l Page 25 of 26 I', _ in, Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101 OFFICE: (206) 291-9859 FAX: (206) 28 I-9922 email: laboratory@rgaenv.com dlk�6RGA ENVIRONMENTAL Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis (EPA 600/R-93/116) Landau Associates Project Location: 510 South 3rd St �V Q NVLAP LAB CODE 200613-0 RGA Batch Number: 11-1326 RGA Project Number: LAND27664 Number of Samples: 71 Client Sample ID Layer ID (if applicable) Asbestos Non -Asbestos Fibrous Non -Fibrous RGA Lab TD Layer Description Components Components Components Layer Comments (if applicable) XX -01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 100% Paint 11012989 Beige layered paint L-2 No Asbestos Detected 75% Calcite Filler and Binder White crystalline material 15% Filler and Binder 101% Mineral Particles L-3 No Asbestos Detected 65'/6 Filler and Binder ('fray granular material 20'/e Sand 151/6 Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report_ YY -01 L-1 No Asbestos Detected 650/6 Rocks 11012990 Shiny rocky material 20% Mineral Particles 150/6 Filler and Binder L-2 No Asbestos Detected 651% Filler and Binder Gray gritty material 20% Sand 15% Mineral Particles Note: This sample was analyzed by Matthew Quarterman, not the analyst listed at the bottom of the report, 7hn rrpun relates only to [he itemx res[ed tf,.amplex ac nut culicaed by R6A F,nvirun,nenlal perxoonel, accuracy of the results is Inniled by the rnelhudoivLy and experti+e of the rumple culleulur Analy.es arc cruss- checked with other laboratories for yualiry assurance purposes This repon shall not be reproduced except m full, with"[ writr— Approval of RC.A Environmental 4 shall not be uxnd ro claim product cndursrnent by NVLAP ur any other agency of the U S Govemrnrnr Sampled By: Emily KahleT !- Received By: Aruna Turaga 5/12/2011 Reviewed By: Aruna Turaga 5/20/2011 Analyzed By: [Minh Huynh 5P-0/2011 Page 26 of 26 RGA E13VlIRONMENTA L _ pM -E. Hartman E ic.Hartman aenv.com fax: 206.281.8922 x PM - D. Mullins debie.muAins aenv.com fax: 206.281.8922 RGA CLIEN7LLandau Associates— th 3`d St ACM SULK SAMTLE DATA SHEET * PLM Analysis Stop Analysis at First Positive PAGE _[OF Analyze All Samples Point Count Analysis (400 -point) Submitted Project Name/Address: S 10 Sou LAi3D27664 Sampled RGA Project #: By: Luke Swart/Emil Kahler Sample Date: -5/11111 Sample(s) Sent To: X RGA EMSL — Other: TAT: Rush _24Hrs 48Hrs X 3-5 Days x** _ REPORT TO: SEE ABOVE PROJECT MANAGER (PM)*** PAX ORE-MAIL MAIL � ***ADDITIONAL REPORT RECIPIENT(S): nIIYURLUI c. Received By: Date/Time" Signature*._ r 'Z Relinquished By:DatePTime: J ".__....,., R... Signature: ki t � 4___1V a" R_,G A ACNt BULK SAMPLE DATA SHEET ENVIRONMENTAL * PLM Analysis PM —E. Hartman x PM - D. Mullins Eric.Hariman aenv.com (ebi2.mUllinS r aenv_com Stop Analysis at First Positive PAGE OF fax: 206.281.8922 fax: 206. 281-8922 Analyze All Samples RGA CLIENT—Landau Associates_ point Count Analysis (400 -point) Submitted Project Name/Address: 510 South 3rd St 'Q RGA project ##: - LAND27664 Sampled By: Luke Swart/Emil Kahler Sample Date._5111/11� Sample(s) Sent To: X RGA _ EMSL _ Other: TAT: Rush 24Hxs 48Hrs X 3-5 Days * FAX OR E-MAIL REPORT TO: SEE A.BOV PROJECT'MANAGER (PM)*** *"ADDITIONAL REPORT RECIPIENT(S): HM# Material Description: Samnlaa TD I Sample Location & Material Location Quantity:. ia. 6f HM# (( Material Description:-�to�ld Sample ID Sap2le Location & Material Location quantity HM#- -T- Material Description: -1 ( fi a►r< t Sample ID Samle Lo & Material Location Quanti a tN W s�-L oZ u HM# Material Description: ��n �� Z. Sample ID Sam le Location & Material Location UQuandt :. f -- a S vim] C�n� 0 HM# Material Description: b Sample ID Sam le Location & Material Location Quanti HM# j, Sam le ID ex a� 05 Relinquished By:. Received By: Relinquished By: - rie..o:..a.t uv• Material Description: Sample Location. & Material Location I �N Signature: V Date/Time: Signature: Date/Time: Signature: . Daterrime: R„ t00 I �1 '° ACM BULK SAMPLE DATA SHEET dh�dRGA ENVIRONMENTAL PLM Analysis PM —E_ Hartman x PM - D. Mullins _ nc.Ha[ man r aenv.com &e__b!e.mullinsjMrQaenv.corn Stop Analysis at First Positive PAGE !�E fax: 206.281.8922 fax: 206.281.8922 Analyze All Samples RGA CLIENT Landau Associates Point Count Analysis (400 -point) Project Name/Addiess: 510 South 3`d St Submitted RGA Project #: LAND27664 Sampled By: Luke SwaWEmily Kahler Sample Date: -5/11/11_ Sample(s) Sent To: X RGA _ EMSL _ Other: TAT: hush 24Hrs 48Hrs X 3-5 Days ***FAQ OR E-MAIL REPORT TO: SEE ABOVE PROJECT MANAGER (PM)'�** ***AnDM0NAL REPORT RECIPIENT(S): YM# Material Description: Sample ID Sample Location & Material Location HM# Material Description: Sam le lD Sam le Location & Material Location - HM# Material Description:.�—� Sarn le ID Sample Location & Material Location 01 Gt �3 HM# Material Description:�C 4_f7 Samnle 16 Sample Location & Material Loca on HM# Material Description: %, '� (%A Sam !e ID Sam le Location & Material Location O HM# Material Description: Sam le ID Sample Location & A Location �,Ffr wig B ,r� w -A �c M, H Signature: f atelTime: [ E cm Relinquished By: Received By: Signature: Date/Time: Relinquished By: Signature: Date/Time: Z Rprriverf Rv: Signature: DatelTie: 0 MI ARGAACNl BULK SAMPLE DATA SHEET E PI V i ft O PI M E NTA L * PLM Analysis _ PM –E=. Hartman x PM - D. Mullins I Erio.Hartmangmaenv_com debie mutlins@rgaenv,com _ Stop Analysis at First Positive PAGE _ Off+' fax,. 206.281.8922 fax: 206.281.8922 Analyze All Samples RGA CLIENT Landau Associates_ Paint Count Analysis (400 -point) Project Name/Address: 51O South 3"d St Submitted l7 RGA Project #: LAND27664 Sampled By: Luke Swart/Emily Kahler Sample Date: -5/11/11_ Sample(s) Sent To: X RGA r PMSL — Other: TAT: —Rush 24Hrs 48Hrs X 3-5 Days ***FAX aR E-MAIL REPaRT TO: SEE ABOVE PROJECT MANAGER (PAD*** ***ADDITIONAL REPORT RECIPIENT(S): Relinquished By: Received By: Relinquished By: Received By: Signature: V Date/Time: r .Signa ture: Date/Time: Signature: Date/Time: Z dRGA ENVIRONMENTAL _ PM —E. Hartman Eric.Hartman r aenv.com fax 206.281.8922 RGA CLIENT Landau Associates x PM - D. Mullins debie.mu1lJns@rqaenv.co02 fax 206.281 .8922 ACM BULK SAMPLE DATA SHEET * PLM Analysis Stop Analysis at First Positive PAGE60R Analyze All Samples 7 Point Count Analysis (400 -point) Project Name/Address: 510 South 3ra St Submitted RGA Project #: LAND27664 Sampled By: Luke SwartlEmily Kahler Sample Date: -5/11/11x,,_ ple(s) Sent To: X RGA — EMSL — Other: TAT: Rush 24Hrs 48Hrs X 3-5 Days * FAX OR E-MAIL REPORT TO: *ADDITIONAL REPORT RECIl'iENT(S): ,SEE ABOVE PROJECT MANAGER. WN) *** HMO Sam Ie ID Material Description: ( r'l lffl e i vi --,r Sample Location & Material Loc tion Quantity: P D Meas HM# Material Description:Ra sl� 1>0 ! Sam lel Sam le Location & Materi 1 Location Quant/ : 1 p o ' i T f S� HM# aterial escription: Sam le 1 Sample ocation & Material Location Quantity. Oq S w HM# Material Description: ' 10kc k Sam le ID Sam le Location & Material LocationQuanti I �e HM# 0C Material Description: V*-4A-Ck- ot Sample ID Sample Location & Material Location Quandt : D HM# Sam le ID Material Description: Sam le Location & Material Location Quanti �5b S C. Relinquished By: Signature: ate/Time: ii ' Received By: Signature: Date/Time: Relinquished By: Signature: A Date/Time: Received Bv: Signature: Date/Time: Z AM RG A AC iL BULK SAMPLE DATA SHEET ENVIRONMENTAL *PLM Analysis PM --E. Hartman x PM - D. Mullins Tn:c.Hartman@rgaenv.com aenv.com debie.mullinsArdaem_com Stop Analysis at First Positive PAGE (,I OF fax: 246.281.8922 fax: 206.281.8922 Analyze All Samples RGA CLIENT Landau Associates_ ,____ Point Count Analysis {400 -point} Project Name/Address: 510 South 3r° St Submitted [7 RGA Project #: LAND27664 Sample(s) Sent To: X RGA — EMSL _ Other: . Sampled By: Luke SwartlEmily Kahler Sample Date: -5/1 IA I TAT: Rush 241irs 481irs X 3-5 Days ***FAX ORE -MAIL REPORT TO: SELF ABOVE PROJECT MANAGER (PM)*** ***ADDITIONAL REPORT RECIPIENT(S): *** HM# Material Description: c'A v `r—S ani p Sample ID Sample Location & Material Location Quantity. Sr_ W1 HM# Sam Ie ID {7 Material Description: Sample Location & Material Location r �1r.5' 10-e— Quanyt L S i HM# r' Material Description: SamePLIPSam le Location & Material Location Quantity., HM# Material Description: C1 k - rr Sam le ID Sample Location & Material Location r elAx Quantity. HM# Material Description: C Sample ID ioSOgr Sample Location & Material Location Ouantity. 1664 HM# Material Description: _ �t Sam le ID Sample Location & Material Location Quanti r Relinquished By:_ Signature: Date/Time: - (3 Received By: Signature: Date/rime.— Relinquished By: Signature: Dateffime: Received By: Signature: Date/Time: ] 2r U Am=RGA ENV IRON M-ENTA L _ PM –E. Hartman Eric. HartmanArgaenv. corn fax: 206.281.8922 RGA CLIENT—Landau Associates x PM - D. Mullins debie.mulllnsQ!gaenv.com fax: 206.281.8922 ACM BULK SAMPLE DATA SHEET * PLM Analysis _ Stop Analysis at First Positive PAGI9'0F !, Analyze All Samples _ Point Count Analysis (404 -point) Project Name/Address: 510 South 3`d St Submitted --10 RGA Project #: LAND27664 Sampled By: Luke Swart/Emily Kahler Sample Date: -5/11/11 Sample(s) Sent To: X RGA — EMSL _ Other: TAT: Rush 24Hrs 4$Hrs X 3-5 Days ***FAX OR E-MAIL REPORT TO: SEE ABOVE PROJECT MANAGER (PM)*** ***ADDITIONAL REPORT RECIPIENT(S): *** HM# Sam Ie ID m( Material Description: Sample Location & Material Location C ..f . Quantity. I �Z HM# Material Description: RZrq t Sam le ID Sam le Location & Material Location .Quare ' HM# Sam le ID Material Description: Sample Location & Materia! Location 7 HM# Material Description: VQ.n r' Sam le ID 6� Sample Location & Material Location' Quantity., HM# ()DMaterial Descrip#ion: Sam le ID Sam Ie Location & Material Loc tion Quantity: �- �t HM# Material Description: Sam le ID bi Sample Location & Material Location si Q Quanti . 1 Relinquished By: Signature: Date/Time:�li;t-- Received By: Signature: Date/Time: Relinquished By: Signature: Date/Time: Received By: Signature: Date/Time: ?i F40 04 4SRC " A ENVIRONMENTAL _ PM -E. Hartman Eric.Hartmar eraaenv_com fax: 206.281.8922 RGA CLIENT Landau Associates x PM - D. Mullins debie.mullinsOruaenv.cam fax: 206.281.8922 - - ACNl BULK SAMPLE DATA SHEET * PLM Analysis _ Stop Analysis at First Positive PAGE1910A _�,AnaIyze All Samples Point Count Analysis (400 -paint) . Project Name/Address: 51O South 3'd St Submitted a RGA Project #: LAND27664 Sampled By: Luke Swart/Emily Kahler Sample Date:-5/11/11— Sauz ple(s) Sent To: X RGA _ EMSL _ Other: TAT: Rush 24Hrs 48Hrs X 3-5 Days ***FAX ORE -MAIL REPORT TO: SEE ABOVE PROJECTMANAGER (PM)*** ***ADDITIONAL REPORT RECIPIENT(S): HM# Material Description: Sam le ID . Sample Location & Material Location Quantify: HM# Material Description: V Sam le ID Sam le Location & Materia Location Quanti : I 16M -54 HM#y( Material Description: Sam le /D Sam le Location & Material Location Quantity.* HM## U\ -Lk Material Description: Sample ID Sam le Location & Material Location Quanti HM# Material Description: J'V A{C Sam le ID Sample Location & Material Location Quanti Q L HM# WLM Material Description: �Qt Sam le ID Sample Location & Material Location Quantity. I D s _X Relinquished By: Signature: 444, 1 DatefTime: !- Received By: Signature: Date/Time: Relinquished By: Signature: Date/Time: Received By: Signature: DatelTime:�0 zw4l N - 11 =44- RGA ACM SULK SAMPLE DATA SHEET ENV I R O N MENTAL * PLM Analysis _ PM —E. Hartman x PM - D. Mullins �j Erlc.Ha an aenv.com debie.mullinsamaenv_com _ Stop Analysis at First Positive PAGE ! OF n fax: 206.281.8922 fax: 206.281.8922 —I Analyze A11 Samples RGA CLIENT Landau Associates_ Point Count Analysis (400 -point) Project Name/Address: 510 South 3rd St Submitted �O RGA Project #: LAND27664 Sampled By: Luke Swart/Emi-ty Kahler Sample Date: -5/11/11 Sample(s) Sent To: X AGA —EMSL Other: TAT: Rush 24Hrs 481-Irs X 3-5 Days ***FAX OR E-MAIL REPORT TO: SEE ABOVE PROJECT MANAGER (P**** ***ADDITIONAL REPORT RECIPIENT(S): * * HM# Sample 1D 0 Material Description: Sam le Location & Material. Location &� Quantity.. b HM# Material Description. e_ - V-o(�,G( Sam le Sample Location & Material Location Quan d S HM# Material Description: Sam le ID Sample Location & Material Location Quantity: HM# Material Description: Sam le ID Sample Location & Material Location Quanti : HM# Material Description: Sam !e ID Sam le Location & Material Location Quant! HM# Material Description: Sam ,le ID Sample Location & Material Location Quanti : Relinquished By:�ia,l�•(3✓ Signature: - r Date/Time: r Received By: Signature: Date/Time: Relinquished By: Signature: Date/Time, Received By: Signature: Date/Time: ) Z Sample Log Chain of Custody Client: Clent Contact Company- Landau Associates Client Address: 8830 NE 14th Street Edmonds WA 98020 - City State Zip Phone #: (425)778-0907 2nd or Cell #: Fax ##: . (425)778-6409 e-mail Address: Project Manager: Deborah Mullins Project Location: 510 South 3rd St Condition: 7L—Go od Damaged Severe Damage RGA Laboratory Services INTERNAL RGA, Batch #: 11-1326 RGA Project #: LAN 027664 Client Job #: Number of Samples: 71 TYPE OF ANALYSIS ASBESTOS: METALS: PCM (air) Paint Sail X PL14i (bulk) Wipe Air Pt. Count (bulk) TCLP Water MOLD: P&K 100 101 102 105 117 Other Method: Turn Around Time (other): 6 day 2 hour / 4 hour Sarre Day One Day Two Day ys 10 days Price per Sample: S # Client Sample 101) I RGA Laboratory ID Comments # Client Sample'ED I RGA Laboratory ID Comments 1 A-01 11012920 1! 1-03 11012930 2 B-01 11012921 12.11-01 11012931 3 C-01 11012922 13 K-01 11012932 4 D-01 11012923 14 L-01 11012933 5 E;-01 11012924 15 L-02 11012934 6 F-01 11012925 16 L-03 11012935 7 G-01 11012926 17 M-01 11012936 8 H-01 11012927 18 N-01 11012937 9 1-01 11012928 19 0-01 11012938 10 1-02 111012929 20 O-02 11012939 Sionahire Date Time Sampled by Relinquished h Received by; Relin ushed-b Received for Laboratory by: Analyzed by: H Preliminary Results Reported to P.M. by: 1� W Final Report to P.M. by. Special Instructions: Analyze All Due by 5/19/2011 CoCO16-(Ray.1/07) *Unless requested in writing, all samples will be properly disposed of 30 days after Final report date. Page 1 of 1 Sample .Log RGA Laboratory Services Chain of Custody INTERNAL Client: Cient Contact RGA Batch 0: 11-1326 Company: Landau Associates RGA Project#: LAND27664 Client Address: 8630 NE 14th Street Client Job #: Comments Edmonds WA 98020- Number of Samples: 71 City State Zip 11012960 22 P-01 Page: 2 of 3 # Client Sample ED RGA Laboratory ID Comments # Client Sample ID RGA Laboratory ID Comments 21 0-03 11012940 41 AA -07 11012960 22 P-01 11012941 42 BB -01 11012961 23 Q-01 1/012942 43 CC -01 11012962 24 R-01 11012943 44 DD -01 11012963 25 S-01 11012944 45 EE -01 11012964 26 1-04 11012945 46 FF -01 11012965 27 1-05 11012946 47 FF -02 11012966 28 1-06 11012947 48 FF -03 11012967 29 1-07 11012948 49 GG -01 11012968 30 C1-01 11012949 50 HH -01 11012969 31 V-02 11012950 51 11-02 11012970 32 W-01 11012951 52 JJ -01 11012971 33 X-01 11012952 53 JJ -02 11012972 34 Z-01 11012953 54 JJ -03 11012973 35 AA -01 11012954 55 KK -01 11012974 36 AA -02 11012955 56 KK -02 11012975 37 AA -03 11012956 57 KK -03 11012976 38 AA -04 11012957 58 LL -01 11012977 39 AA -05 11012958 59 MM -01 11012978 16 40 AA -06 111012959 60 NN -01 1.1012979 Signature Date t Time Sam led k: ` '` i }IJ Relinquished by: Received by: Reim dished b Received for Laboratory by: Z' (1 Analyzed by: 0 1 i'l Preliminary Results Reported to P.WL by: e Final ort to P.M. 6y: Special Instructions: Analyze All Due by 5119/2011 CoC017-(Rev.I/07) *Unless requested in writing, all samplers will be properly disposed of 30 days after final report dato. Page I of I Client: Sample Log RGA Laboratory Services Chain of Custody INTERNAL Cient Contact RGA Batch #: 11-1326 Company: Landau Associates RGA Project #: LAND27664 Client Address: 8830 NE 14th Street Client Job #: Comments Edmonds WA 98020- Number of Samples: 71 City State Zip 62 PP -01 Page: 3 of 3 # Client Sample ED RGA Laboratory ID Comments # Client Sample ID RGA Laboratory ID Comments 61 1 00-01 11012980 81 62 PP -01 11012981 82 63 QQ-01 11012982 S3 64 RR -01 11012983 84 65 SS -01 11012984 85 66 TT -01 11012985 96 67 UU-01 11012986 87 68 W-01 11012987 88 69 WW -01 11012988 89 70 XX -01 11012989 90 71 YY -01 11012990 91 72 92 73 93 74 94 75 95 76 96 77 97 78 98 79 1 99 100 gionattirp Data Time Sampled by-. S Relin uished by: Received by: Relm. uislaed by . _. - Received for Laboratory by: Analyzed by: loll Nt Preliminary Results Reported to P.X by' Final Report to P.M. 6v: Special Instructions: Analyze All Due by 5/19/2011 CoC017-(Rov.1/07) *[finless requested in writing, all samples will be properly dtsposed 01 3V days alter Imal report Clare. rage t 01 1 mRGA ENVIRONMENTAL May 18, 2011 RGA Batch #: 11-1327 Client: Client Contact Company: Landau Associates 8830 ONE 14th Street Edmonds, WA, 98020 Project; 510 S 3rd St, Renton Project #: LAND27664 Matrix: TCLP-Lead P.C. 4: NIA Date Sampled: 5/11/2011 Sampled By: Emily K Date Received: 5/12/2011 Method: EPA SW -846 Method 1311/7420 Date Analyzed: 5/18/2011 Analyst: Aruna Turaga LEAD SAMPLE RESULTS RGA Lab ID Client ID RL (mom) 11012991 TCLP 0.64 QA/QC Results Batch QC MS' Method Blank 100% Recovery < 0.64 mg1L r Reviewed by: Dr. Aruna Turaga, Laboratory Director Page 1 of 1 Concentration (mom) < 0.64 RL - reporting limit mg - milligrams L - liters < - less than aRGA ENVIRONMENTAL Client: Landall Assoc. 6 Lead TCLP Page—f of - Sample Data Shett11 _ i -� R. ' Batch M RGA Project #: LAND27664 Client Contact: Date: 6111111 Location: Biq 5 RGA Project Manager Debie Mullins 510 S. Tu St. Renton, WA Sampled by: LSIEK Lab: RGA Environmental Method: EPA$W-846-7420 Contaminant: Lead TCLP Composition Worksheet for Construction/Demolition Debris 1 ah Ramnlp A Min -Max % .v .Sample Wt. Description of (grams) lab Materials Sampled p . C� SVAI e. 2 CIT 2.5 C o.coft- - J / V -f-- �r f 1 a V Qr--4,—e l 0 c � V ' IF4C-4 Agz' I Total -100% gram Hevrslon u7r1rwr RGA Representative Signature: Date: 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 900 a Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 281-8858 • Fax: (206) 281-8922 ZRGA ENVIRONMENTAL Lead TCLP Page-i-pf-2-1 Sample Data Sheet Batch #: '~ RGA Project # LAND27664 Client: Landall Assoc. Client Contact: Date: 5111111 Location: Big 5 RGA Project Manager Debie Mullins 510 S. 3 St - Renton, WA Sampled by: LSIPK Lab: RGA Environmental Contaminant: Lead Method: EPA SW -846-7420 TCF_P Composition Worksheet for Construction/Demolition Debris r:_1.J G+.....,.....1— 4& I ah Camnla $ IVIM VM.a Min-Max % Sample Wt. rams lab C Description of Materials Sampled iA i • � � U�.� 1 vSf' F�4 Total -100% gram A r� i dI Revision 07/2W7 RGA Representative Signature: Date: 611 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 900 • Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: (206) 281-5858 • Fax. (206) 281-8922 Sample Log Chain of Custody Client: Cient Contact Company: Landau Associates Client Address: 8830 NE 14th Street Edmonds WA 98020 - City State Zip Phone #: (425)778-0907 2nd or Cell #: Fax #: (425)778-6405 e-mail Address: Project Manager: Deborah Mullins Project Location: 510 S 3rd St Renton, WA Condilion:� Goad Damaged Severe Damage RGA Laboratory Services INTERNAL, RGA Batch #: 11-1327 RGA Project#: LAND27664 Client Job #: Number of Samples: `) TYPE OF ANALYSIS ASBESTOS: METALS: PCM (air) Point Soil PLM (bulk) Wipe Air Pt. Count (bulk) )( TCLP Water MOLD: P&K 100 _ 101 102 _ 105 _ 117 Other Method: Turn Around Time (other): 5 day 2 hour / 4 hour Same Day :POne Day Two Day ys 0 days rPr-ie-eper Sample: # Client Sample 1D I RGA Laboratory IDI Comments # Client Sample ID RGA Laboratory ID Comments I TCLP 11012991 11 2 12 3 13 4 H5 14 15 16 7 � 17 18 g 19 10 20 Kinnatfil•P IIn iB I IIIIC Sampled by: Relinquished by: Received by: k6lijiq by. Received for Laboratory by: Analyzed by, ti Z Preliminag Results Reported to P.M. by; Final Report to P.M. bp: Special Instructions: Due by 5119/2011 COCO 16 -(Rey. 1/07) *Unless requested in writing, all samples will be properly disposed of 30 days after final report date. Pago t of I S Certificate of Completion This is to certify that Luke Swart has satisfactorily aunpieted 4 hours of refresher training as an AHERA Building Inspector in compliance with TSCA Tette 8 ANERA 40 CFR Part 783 U.S. EPA Region IDAccredi abon #M Course Date: 511012011 Cert, li 11-2387 RGA1730 Minor Ave Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101 •888.281.8858 E V V I R 0 N M E N T A L www.rgatrainingmn 4 hours of refresher b-Arring as an AHERA Building InspedoT Luke Swart cert 11-2387 Course Date Snow It &.dW req -W by: 5182012 Instructor, Andre 2lNanenburg Trairdng manager: ynndr Newell ROATralrailrg: 20626&6313 RGA consuitting: 2062-99111M CorpW-40 00iee: 310.547.7771 ARGA 1730 Nfawr Ave Suite 900. Seattle. WA 98101 LNIMP"—"Ir t 88281.88 'WWW.rgehalning.=n d i W Certificate of Completion This is to certify that Emmy Kahler has satisfactorily completed 4 hours of refresher training as an AHERA Building Inspector in compliance with TSCA Title II AHERA 40 CFR part 763 U.S. EPA Region 10 Accreditation 9792 Course Date: 5/10/2011 C'ert_# 11-2382 dshid RGA 730 Minor Ave Suite 900 Seattle. WA 98101 - 888.281.8858 ENV] R O N 11+1 E N T rel L www.rgatraining.com 4 hours of refresher training as an AHERA Building Inspector Emily Kahler CerL# 11-2382 Course [Yate: 511Q=`l1 Refresher requhtd by. 51812092 instructor Andre Zwanenburg Training Manager, Wendy Newell RGA Training: 2D6.269.6313 RGA Laboratory: 2D6.956.3775 RGA Consulting: 206.2695302 Corporate office: 510.547.7771 ARGA 1730 Minor Ave Suite goo, Seattle. WA 98101 [NY4acN M[NYrMG 888_2$1•$88$8-wy w_rgatraining.corn 1 0 0 Geotechnical Engineering Services Report Renton Downtown Library Renton, Washington for King County Library System November 2, 2011 GEoENGINEERs� 8410 154th Avenue NE Redmond, Washington 98052 425.861.6000 Geotechnical Engineering Services Renton Downtown Library Renton, Washington File Ne.1784015-00 November 2, 2011 Prepared for: King County Library System 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, Washington 98027-2702 Attention: Kay Johnson Prepared by. GeoEngineers, Inc. 6410154' Avenue NE Redmond, Washington 98052 425.861.6000 Heidi P. Dista, EIT Geotechnical Engineer Matthew W. Smith, PE Principal 1 11 '- HPD: Iw OISOWmer Anyeloo ronic (oma fa tmlle of hard copy of the Wginal document (email, tem, tsve, and/or wrei. IfpNrlded, a �cnments are any a copyofthe originaldocument.ThoorlglnaldoaimentistaxedtyGeoEmginears,Inc, and rAllserve asthe ofAdeldocum"i �O� �t 1 Copy OtO 2011 by Geo&gloeers, Irrc, AN rights reserved. �11�7 P fg GEOENGlNEER� Table of Contents INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................1 General...................................................................................................................................................1 ProjectDescription.................................................................................................................................1 Purposeand Scope................................................................................................................................1 FIELD EXPLORATIONS..................................................................................................................................1 PREVIOUSSTUDIES......................................................................................................................................1 SITEDESCRIPTION........................................................................................................................................2 SurfaceConditions.......................................................................................................... ....................2 Subsurface Soil Conditions.............................................................................................. ....2 ................. GroundwaterConditions........................................................................................................................ 2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................3 Summary................................................................................................................................................3 EarthquakeEngineering........................................................................................................................3 General............................................................................................................................................ 3 Liquefaction..................................................................................................................................... 3 LateralSpreading............................................................................................................................4 OtherSeismic Hazards...................................................................................................................4 2009 IBC Seismic Design Information...........................................................................................4 FoundationSupport...............................................................................................................................5 General............................................................................................................................................ 5 GroundImprovement................................................•--..........................................................................5 General............................................................................................................................................ 5 LeanAugercast Columns...............................................................................................................5 ShallowFoundations.............................................................................................................................7 AllowableBearing Pressure............................................................................................................7 Settlement....................................................................................................................................... 7 Sizeand Embedment......................................................................................................................7 LateralResistance.......................................................................................................................... 7 Construction Considerations..........................................................................................................8 ConstructionDewatering.......................................................................................................................8 FoundationDrains...............................................................................................................•---.............. 8 Slab -on -Grade Floors.............................................................................................................................8 SubgradePreparation.....................................................................................................................8 DesignParameters..........................................................................................................................9 Earthwork............................................................................................. ........... 9 ExcavationConsiderations............................................................................................................. 9 Clearingand Site Preparation......................................................................................................10 SubgradePreparation...................................................................................................................10 StructuralFill.................................................................................................................................10 TemporaryCut Slopes...................................................................................................................11 Sedimentation and Erosion Control.............................................................................................12 PavementRecommendations.....-----..................................................................................................12 GfoENGINEER� November 2, 2611 Page File Na. 1784-015-00 SubgradePreparation...................................................................................................................12 AsphaltPavement............................................................................................................ .........12 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement.........................................................................................13 Recommended Additional Geotechnical Services.............................................................................13 LIMITATIONS...............................................................................................................................................14 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................................14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site Plan APPENDICES Appendix A. Field Explorations Figures A-1 and A-2 - Log of CPT Appendix B. Previous Studies Appendix C. Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Page H November2, 2011 GeoEngineers, Inc. Re Na. 1784-015-0G RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Re Washington INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of GeoEngineers' geotechnical engineering services for the Renton Downtown Library in Renton, Washington. The location of the site and general configuration of the proposed building are shown on the Vicinity Map and Site Plan, Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Project Description The Renton Downtown Library site comprises about 0.25 acres and is currently occupied by an existing masonry building. The existing retail structure (approximately 12,185 square feet) occupies the entire lot, with associated street parking along South 3rd Street and in the alley just north of the structure. The property is bordered by Gateway Park and its associated parking lot to the east, South 31d Street to the south, an existing structure (St. Paul Ministries) to the west, and an alley to the north. The development is currently planned to be a new library building with no below grade levels. This work will require demolition of the existing masonry building. Purpose and Scope The purpose of our services is to evaluate soil and groundwater conditions as a basis for developing design criteria for the geotechnical aspects of the Renton Downtown Library. Field explorations were performed to identify and evaluate subsurface conditions at the site in order to develop engineering recommendations for use in design of the project. GeoEngineers' geotechnical engineering services were completed in general accordance with our services agreement executed on September 14, 2011. FIELD EXPLORATIONS Subsurface conditions were evaluated through a field exploration program that consisted of advancing two cone penetration test (CPT) probes (CPT -1 and CPT -2) to depths of 39 feet and 26 feet below existing grades, respectively. The explorations were completed on the parking lot adjacent to the site, east of the existing masonry building, using truck -mounted equipment. The locations of the CPT probes are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. A detailed description of the field exploration program is presented in Appendix A, Field Explorations. PREVIOUS STUDIES The logs of borings from the geotechnical engineering report by Geotech Consultants, Inc. titled "Proposed Mixed -Use Building, 2XX Logan Avenue South in Renton, Washington," dated August 26, 1997, were reviewed as part of this study. During that study, four borings (B-1, B-2, B-3 GEOENGINEERS Novembet 2, 2011 I Pagel File No. 1 i 84-015-00 RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Renton, Washington and B-4) were drilled at the site to depths of 31 to 41.5 feet. See Figure 2 for the approximate locations of the borings. The logs of selected previous borings are presented in Appendix B. SITE DESCRIPTION Surface Conditions The Renton Downtown library site is bounded by South 3,d Street to the south, Gateway Park to the east, St. Paul Ministry Church to the west and a city street with surface parking lot to the north. The site is currently occupied by a one story masonry structure, and a surface parking lot located on the eastern portion of the site. The topography at the site is relatively flat, sloping gently downward from the eastern portion of the site, which is situated at about Elevation 36 feet, to about Elevation 34 feet along the west portion of the site. Several underground utilities are located on and around the site. Two City of Seattle water mains are located north of the site, with diameters of 56 -inches and 66 -inches. Buried gas utilities are present on the east side of the site. Vegetation adjacent to the site consists of deciduous trees and ornamental landscaping north of the existing building. No surface water features were observed at the site. Subsurface Soil Conditions The CPT results for the site indicate that the site is underlain by two main soil units, near surface silt and clay soils and underlying alluvial sand deposits. The two soil units consisted of the following: 0 SILT AND CLAY: Interlayered deposits of very soft to soft clay, silty clay and clayey silt were encountered in both CPT's (CPT -1 and CPT -2) from below the pavement surface to depths of approximately 11.5 to 15 feet below existing grades. ■ ALLUVIAL SAND DEPosrrs: Medium dense to very dense alluvial sand deposits were encountered beneath the silt and clay soils in both explorations. The alluvial sand deposits generally consist of sand and gravel with occasional interbedded layers of silt. The alluvial sand deposits extended to the depth explored (both CPT explorations met refusal in very dense layers of the alluvial sand deposits). Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was encountered at approximate depths ranging from 12 to 15 feet below existing grades in borings completed in the site vicinity. Groundwater levels will vary as a function of season, precipitation and other factors. Paget November2,2011 GeoEngineers,lnc, File No. 1784-015.00 RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Re Washington CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary A summary of the primary geotechnical considerations is provided below. The summary is presented for introductory purposes only and should be used in conjunction with the complete recommendations presented in this report. ■ Due to the presence of both compressible and liquefiable soils in the planned building area, the use of either deep foundations or spread foundations with ground improvement is recommended to meet static and seismic settlement tolerances. In our opinion, the most cost effective foundation support option is the use of ground improvement and shallow foundations. General recommendations are provided below for ground improvement (lean augercast columns), which is the selected ground improvement methodology. a Shallow foundations supported on ground improved with lean augercast columns may be designed using an allowable bearing value of 3,000 pounds per square feet (psf). The allowable bearing value may be increased by one-third for short duration loads such as wind or seismic events. ■ If ground improvement is implemented as recommended, then conventional slabs -on -grade are appropriate. m Because the site is underlain by potentially liquefiable soils, the site is designated as seismic Soil Profile Type F per the 2009 International Building Code (IBC). Given that the planned structure is expected to have a fundamental period of vibration equal to or less than 0.5 seconds, a site response analysis is not required to determine the spectral accelerations and the site class can be determined in accordance with Section of 20.3 of ASCE 7. Per ASCE 7, the site is best characterized as Site Class D. m The soils encountered on site can be characterized as compressible and potentially liquefiable. The results of our liquefaction analyses indicate that portions of the alluvial sand deposits present below the groundwater table are potentially liquefiable during a design earthquake. Liquefaction -induced settlement is estimated to range up to 3 inches for the design earthquake level of shaking. Our specific geotechnical recommendations are presented in the following sections of this report. Earthquake Engineering General GeoEngineers evaluated the site for seismic hazards including liquefaction. Our analyses indicate that the site has a low to moderate risk of liquefaction induced settlement during a design level earthquake. The liquefaction hazard and building code site coefficients are discussed in detail below_ Llquelaction Liquefaction refers to the condition by which vibration or shaking of the ground, usually from earthquake forces, results in the development of excess pore pressures in saturated soils with subsequent loss of strength in the deposit of soil so affected. In general, soils that are susceptible GEoENGINEER November 2, 2011 Page Fiervo 1784-015.00 RENTON OO"""OWN LIBRARY Renton. Washington to liquefaction include very loose to medium dense clean to silty sands and some silts that are below the water table. The results of our analyses indicate that a portion of the medium dense to very dense alluvial sands deposits encountered in the explorations have a low to moderate potential for liquefaction during a design earthquake event. The evaluation of liquefaction potential is a complex procedure and is dependent on numerous site parameters, including soil grain size, soil density, site geometry, static stress, and the design ground acceleration. Typically, the liquefaction potential of a site is evaluated by comparing the cyclic stress ratio (CSR), which is the ratio of the cyclic shear stress induced by an earthquake to the initial effective overburden stress, to the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR), which is the soils resistance to liquefaction. Estimation of the CSR and the CRR were completed using empirical methods (Youd, et al., 2001). Estimated ground settlement resulting from earthquake -induced liquefaction was analyzed using empirical procedures based on correlations from the CPT results (Tokimatsu and Seed, 1987; Ishihara and Yoshimine, 1992). Our analyses indicate that during a design earthquake, settlements caused by liquefaction of portion of the alluvial sand deposits encountered on the explorations could range up to 3 inches. Latera! Spreading Lateral spreading involves lateral displacement of large, surficial blocks of soil as the underlying soil layer liquefies. Because there is a potential for liquefaction, there is also risk of lateral spreading. Due to the fact that there is no free surface near the project vicinity, the liquefiable soil layers are relatively thin, and the geographic distance to Cedar River, the potential for lateral spreading is considered to be low for the Renton Downtown Library site. Other Seismic Hazards Due to the location of the site and the site's topography, the risk of adverse impacts resulting from seismically induced slope instability, differential settlement, or surface displacement due to faulting is considered to be low. 2009 IBC Seismic Design Information We recommend the use of the following 2009 IBC parameters for soil profile type, short period spectral response acceleration (Ss), 1 -second period spectral response acceleration (Si) and seismic coefficients (FA and Fv) for the project site. 2009 IBC Parameter Recommended Value Soil Profile Type D Short Period Spectral Response Acceleration, Ss (percent g) 142.9 1 -Second Period Spectral Response Acceleration, Si (percent g) 48.9 Seismic Coefficient, FA 1.0 Seismic Coefficient, Fv 1.51 Page Novennber2,2011 GeoEngineers.Inc. Fie No. 1784-015-00 RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Re Washington Foundation Support General The feasibility of deep foundations and several ground improvement methods was explored for the Renton Downtown Library building. The proximity to nearby structures precluded the use of driven piles, stone columns and rammed aggregate piers because of the associated noise and vibrations. While augercast piles are considered feasible, requirements for full -depth reinforcement in liquefiable soils combined with cost of piles, pile caps and grade beams for this relatively light structure made this not the preferred foundation support option. We also explored the feasibility of a mat foundation bearing on native soil, but the concern for excessive foundation settlements under static and seismic loading made this not the preferred option. After exploring these options, we concluded that shallow foundations bearing on improved soil is the preferred foundation alternative. More detailed recommendations are presented below. Ground Improvement General Due to the presence of both compressible and liquefiable soils in the planned building area, the use of either deep foundations or spread foundations with ground improvement is recommended to meet static and seismic settlement tolerances. After exploring several options, the preferred foundation support option is the use of ground improvement and shallow foundations. General recommendations are provided below for ground improvement (lean augercast columns) which is the preferred ground improvement methodology. Should augercast piles be preferred by the project team, GeoEngineers should be contacted to develop augercast pile design recommendations. For the Renton Downtown Library site, the purposes of ground improvement are twofold: the ground improvement will: 1) mitigate potential liquefaction hazards in the building area and 2) mitigate potential static settlement resulting from consolidation of the near surface cohesive soils. The benefits of ground improvement for this site include: ■ Ground improvement will allow for conventional shallow foundations and slabs -on -grade both of which are anticipated to result in more efficient and more cost effective construction. Without ground improvement, a structural slab with suspended utilities may be necessary to reduce post earthquake settlement of the slab -on -grade. ■ Ground improvement will mitigate the liquefaction potential in the improved zone and as a result, the near surface improved soil zone will act to minimize differential settlement within the building area. ■ Ground improvement will mitigate the potential static settlement resulting from consolidation of the near surface cohesive soils under the building loads. Lean Augercast Columns Lean concrete augercast columns installed to an approximate depth of 20 to 30 feet below site grades on a variable grid pattern have been selected as the preferred ground improvement technique for the Renton Downtown Library site. The design concept with the use of lean concrete augercast columns is similar to that of compaction grouting, stone columns (vibro replacement) or GMENGINEERNovember 2, 2011 Page 5 FUN,,) 1763-015-00 RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Renton, Washington rammed aggregate piers (also known as Geopiers)—to densify and reinforce the compressible/potentially liquefiable soils. The purpose of the lean concrete augercast columns placed in a grid pattern is to provide a significantly higher strength material capable of dissipating building loads in a less concentrated manor and to provide a `block' of a composite soil and lean concrete material that will reduce the potential for differential settlement during seismic loading. Advantages with the use of lean augercast columns include: 1) lean concrete augercast columns are more economical than augercast piles (shorter length, no reinforcement, and allows for the use of conventional spread footings/slabs-on-grade), 2) there is minimal disturbance of adjacent structures during installation, 3) the equipment (augercast pile equipment) provides a cased hole for installation of the column, and 4) because there is a lower level of construction noise (i.e. no pile driving), there will be lesser impacts to nearby businesses/residences/buried utilities during construction. Alternative ground improvement technologies are not preferred for the Downtown Renton Library site for the following reasons: a Stone columns have a high potential for damage to adjacent improvements due to the proximity of the adjacent improvements to the site. a Rammed aggregate piers are not practical below the water table due to caving of the sands below the water table. a Compaction grouting is considered problematic due to the difficulty in achieving a column of grout in the near surface soils consistently (due to the inability to build sufficient pressure to displace the existing soils). Lean augercast columns are constructed using a continuous flight hollow stem auger attached to a set of leads supported by a crane. The first step in the column casting process consists of drilling the auger into the ground to the specified tip elevation of the column. Grout is then pumped through the hollow stem auger upon steady withdrawal of the auger and replaces the soils removed on the flights of the auger. The benefit of using lean augercast columns in this site is that the auger provides support for the soils during the column installation process, thus eliminating the need for temporary casing or drilling fluid. The layout/design of the lean augercast columns will be completed once the building design has been finalized. For preliminary design and pricing purposes, we provide the following preliminary design information for ground improvement: a 18 to 24 -inch -diameter columns; a Use a 5 to 7 foot triangular lean augercast column spacing for column, strip, and mat foundations; a Use a S to 10 foot triangular column spacing for slab -on -grade areas; a Lean augercast columns will extend from the bottom of foundation elevation to approximately 20 to 30 feet below existing site grades; and ■ Access for the lean augercast column equipment (crane and grout truck) will be necessary. Given the soft condition of the near surface soils, construction access improvements will likely Page 6 November 2, 2011 GeoEngineers, Inc. Fide No. 1784-015-00 RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Re Washington be required. This can consist of leaving the existing slab -on -grade and pave ment/h a rdscape in place as a working surface or removal of the pave ment/sla b -on -gra de/ha rdsca pe and a layer of the near surface soils and replacing them with granular fill, crushed rock or quarry spalls. Alternatively, the use of cement treatment can be used to provide a trafficable working surface. GeoEngineers can assist the project team with preparation of the ground improvement plan and specifications once the foundation layout and building loads have been finalized. Shallow Foundations As described above, shallow foundations bearing on ground improved with lean concrete augercast columns is the preferred foundation support system. The following sections provide recommendations for design of shallow foundations. Allowable Bearing Pressure For foundations constructed as recommended in this report and bearing on improved ground, we recommend using an allowable bearing pressure of 3 kips per square foot (ksf) for shallow foundations. The allowable soil bearing pressure applies to the total of dead and long-term live loads and may be increased by up to one-third for wind or seismic loads. The allowable soil bearing pressures are net values. Settlement Provided that loose soil is removed and that the subgrade is prepared as recommended under "Construction Considerations" below, we estimate that the total static settlement of shallow foundations will be about 1 inch or less. The settlements will occur rapidly, essentially as loads are applied. differential settlements between footings could be half of the total settlement. !Vote that smaller settlements will result from lower applied loads. Size and Embedment We recommend that the exterior footings be founded a minimum of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade. Interior footings should be founded a minimum of 12 inches below top of slab. Continuous wall footings and individual column footings should have minimum widths of 24 inches. Lateral Resistance Lateral foundation loads may be resisted by passive resistance on the sides of footings and by friction on the base of the shallow foundations. For shallow foundations supported on improved ground, the allowable frictional resistance may be computed using a coefficient of friction of 0.35 applied to vertical dead -load forces. The allowable passive resistance may be computed using an equivalent fluid density of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) (triangular distribution). These values are appropriate for foundation elements that are surrounded by structural fill. The above coefficient of friction and passive equivalent fluid density values incorporate a factor of safety of about 1.5. GEoENGINEERSNovember2, 2011 Page 7 F€Ee No. 1764-015-00 RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Renton, Washington Construction Considerations We recommend that the condition of all subgrade areas be observed by GeoEngineers to evaluate whether the work is completed in accordance with our recommendations and whether the subsurface conditions are as anticipated. If soft areas are present at the footing subgrade elevation, the soft areas should be removed and replaced with lean concrete or structural fill at the direction of GeoEngineers. In such instances, the zone of structural fill should extend laterally beyond the footing edges a horizontal distance at least equal to the thickness of the fill. The near surface soils are susceptible to softening from water or construction traffic. If necessary, we recommend that the contractor be prepared to pour a mud mat consisting of lean concrete across the exposed foundation subgrade to protect it from softening during wet weather conditions or where groundwater seepage is present. Construction Dewatering Dewatering during construction is not anticipated except for deep utility trenches. Based on the soil conditions and our experience in the area, we expect that groundwater in excavations less than about 1 to 2 feet below the static groundwater level can be controlled by open pumping using sump pumps. If excavations deeper than 2 feet below the water table are required, GeoEngineers should be contacted to provide guidance to the project team regarding temporary dewatering. Foundation Drains We recommend that a perimeter foundation drain be installed around the building. The perimeter drain should be provided with cleanouts and should consist of a 4 -inch -diameter perforated pipe placed on a 4 -inch -thick bed of, and surrounded by 6 inches of, drainage aggregate enclosed in a non -woven geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 14ON (or approved equivalent) to prevent fine soil from migrating into the drain material. Gradation recommendations for the drainage aggregate are presented below in the "Earthwork" section of this report. We recommend that the drainpipe consist of either heavy -wall solid pipe (SDR -35 polyvinyl chloride [PVC], or equivalent) or rigid corrugated smooth interior polyethylene pipe (ADS W12, or equivalent). We also recommend against using flexible tubing for foundation drainpipes. The perimeter drain should be sloped to drain by gravity, if practicable, to a suitable discharge point, preferably a storm drain. We recommend that the cleanouts be covered and be placed in flush -mounted utility boxes. Water collected in roof downspout lines must not be routed to the foundation drain lines. Slab -on -Grade Floors Subgrade Preparation Given the soft nature of the near surface soils, it is anticipated that improvement will be required to provide access for the ground improvement equipment (crawler crane). This can consist of construction of a granular fill (sand and gravel, crushed rock, shoulder ballast, or quarry spalls) layer at the site or the use of cement treatment. GeoEngineers recommends that site grading be completed such that the final grade of the improved site access (top of the granular fill or cement Page 8 Novernber2, 2011 GeoEngineers, Inc. File No. 1783 U15,911 RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Re Washington treated soil) coincide with the slab -on -grade subgrade elevation. This will allow for the site access improvement layer to provide firm support for the capillary break layer to be placed below the slab - on -grades. Following construction of the ground improvement, below slab utilities, and shallow foundations, the exposed subgrade should be evaluated. Proof -roiling with heavy, rubber -tired construction equipment should be used for this purpose during dry weather and if access for this equipment is practical. Probing should be used to evaluate the subgrade during periods of wet weather or if access is not feasible for construction equipment. The exposed soil should be firm and unyielding, and without significant groundwater. Disturbed areas should be recompacted if possible or removed and replaced with compacted structural fill. We recommend that the slabs be supported on a 6 -inch thick capillary break layer (described below in Design Parameters) overlying a _6 -inch thick layer of compacted granular structural fill meeting the requirements of Mineral Aggregate Type 17 (bank run gravel), or Minder Aggregate Type 22 (5/a4nch crushed gravel), City of Seattle Standard Specification 9-03.16. Design Parameters Conventional slabs may be supported on -grade, provided the subgrade soils are prepared as recommended in the "Subgrade Preparation" section above. For slabs designed as a beam on an elastic foundation, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 150 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for subgrade soils prepared as recommended. We recommend that the slab -on -grade floors be underlain by a 6 -inch -thick capillary break consisting of material meeting the requirements of Mineral Aggregate Type 22 (5/s -inch crushed gravel), City of Seattle Standard Specification 9-03.16, with the exception that this material should have less than 10 percent sand and less than 3 percent fines. Provided that loose soil is removed and the subgrade is prepared as recommended, we estimate that slabs -on -grade will not settle appreciably under static loading. A vapor barrier should be used below slab -on -grade floors located in occupied portions of the building. Specification of the vapor barrier requires consideration of the performance expectations of the occupied space, the type of flooring planned and other factors, and is typically completed by other members of the project team. Earthwork Excavation Considerations Interbedded layers of soft to medium stiff silts and clays and loose sand with variable amounts of silt were observed in the upper 10 to 15 feet on the explorations. We anticipate that these soils may be excavated with conventional excavation equipment, such as trackhoes or dozers. GEoENGINEER5 Nove mber 2, 2 0 11 Page File Na 17H4 ois-no RENTON DO""' -OWN LIBRARY Renton, Washington Clearing and Site Preparation Construction of the Renton Downtown Library site will require demolition of the existing building, parking areas, sidewalks, and other appurtenant structures. Concrete and asphalt may be recycled and reused as structural fill; otherwise it should be removed from the site along with other construction debris. All existing utilities should be removed from the building footprint and rerouted if needed. Areas to be developed or graded should be cleared of surface and subsurface deleterious matter including any debris, shrubs, trees and associated stumps and roots. Subgrade Preparation The exposed subgrade in hardscape and pavement areas at the site should be evaluated after site excavation is complete. Disturbed areas below slabs and foundations should be recompacted if the subgrade soil consists of granular material. If the subgrade soils consist of disturbed silt, it will likely be necessary to remove and replace the disturbed soil with structural fill unless the silt can be adequately moisture -conditioned and compacted. Structural Rif Fill placed to support structures, placed behind retaining structures, and placed below pavements and sidewalks will need to be specified as structural fill as described below: ■ Structural fill placed behind retaining walls should meet the requirements of Mineral Aggregate Type 17 (bank run gravel), City of Seattle Standard Specification 9-03.16. ■ Structural fill placed below the capillary break layer for slabs -on -grade should meet the requirements of Mineral Aggregate Type 17 (bank run gravel), City of Seattle Standard Specification 9-03.16. ■ Structural fill placed within utility trenches and below pavement and sidewalk areas should meet the requirements of common borrow (WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.14(3)). Common borrow will be suitable for fill if placed during dry weather. if structural fill is placed during wet weather, it should consist of gravel borrow (WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.14(1)), with the added exception that the fines content, material passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve, should not exceed 5 percent. ■ Structural fill placed around foundation and wall drains should meet the requirements of gravel backfill for drains (WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.12(4)). m Structural fill placed for a granular work pad should consist of shoulder ballast conforming to WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.9(2) or approved alternative. ■ Structural fill placed as crushed surfacing base course below pavements and sidewalks should meet the requirements of crushed surfacing base course (WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.9(3)). ON-SITE soils. The on-site soils contain relatively high fines content and moisture content expected to exceed the optimum moisture content. The on-site soils typically do not meet the requirements for common borrow and will be unsuitable for use as structural fill. Page 10 November2, 2011 Geo£ngineers, Inc, File ka. 1784 415-00 RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Re Washington FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION CRITERIA. Structural fill should be mechanically compacted to a firm, non -yielding condition. Structural fill should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 1 foot in thickness. Each lift should be conditioned to the proper moisture content and compacted to the specified density before placing subsequent lifts. Structural fill should be compacted to the following criteria: ■ Structural fill placed in building areas (supporting foundations or slab -on -grade floors) and in pavement and sidewalk areas (including utility trench backfill) should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD) estimated in accordance with ASTM D 1557. ■ Structural fill placed against subgrade walls should be compacted to between 90 and 92 percent of the MOD. Care should be taken when compacting fill against subsurface walls to avoid over -compaction and hence overstressing the walls. We recommend that a GeoEngineers representative be present during proof -rolling and/or probing of the exposed subgrade soils in building and pavement areas, and during placement of structural fill. We will evaluate the adequacy of the subgrade soils and identify areas needing further work, perform in-place moisture -density tests in the fill to verify compliance with the compaction specifications, and advise on any modifications to the procedures that may be appropriate for the prevailing conditions. WEATHER CONSIDERATIONS. The on-site soils contain a sufficient percentage of fines (silt and clay) to be moisture -sensitive. When the moisture content of these soils is more than a few percent above the optimum moisture content, these soils become muddy and unstable, and operation of equipment on these soils is difficult. Additionally, disturbance of near -surface soils should be expected if earthwork is completed during periods of wet weather. During wet weather, we recommend that: ■ The ground surface in and around the work area should be sloped so that surface water is directed away from the work area. The ground surface should be graded such that areas of ponded water do not develop. The contractor should take measures to prevent surface water from collecting in excavations and trenches. Measures should be implemented to remove surface water from the work area. ■ Slopes with exposed soils should be covered with plastic sheeting or similar means. ■ The site soils should not be left uncompacted and exposed to moisture. Sealing the surficial soils by rolling with a smooth -drum roller prior to periods of precipitation will reduce the extent to which these soils become wet or unstable. • Construction traffic should be restricted to specific areas of the site, preferably areas that are surfaced with materials not susceptible to wet weather disturbance. ■ Construction activities should be scheduled so that the length of time that soils are left exposed to moisture is reduced to the extent practicable. Temporary Cut Slopes Excavations are required for underground utilities. The stability of open cut slopes is a function of soil type, groundwater seepage, slope inclination, slope height and nearby surface loads. The use GEoENGINEERNovember 2, 2011 Page 11 Ric No. 1784,015-130 PENTON 00' _ WN LIBRARY Renton, Washington of inadequately designed open cuts could impact the stability of adjacent work areas, existing utilities, and endanger personnel. The contractor performing the work has the primary responsibility for protection of workmen and adjacent improvements. In our opinion, the contractor will be in the best position to observe subsurface conditions continuously throughout the construction process and to respond to variable soil and groundwater conditions. Therefore, the contractor should have the primary responsibility for deciding whether or not to use open cut slopes for much of the excavations rather than some form of temporary excavation support, and for establishing the safe inclination of the cut slope. Acceptable slope inclinations for utilities and ancillary excavations should be determined during construction. Because of the diversity of construction techniques and available shoring systems, the design of temporary shoring is most appropriately left up to the contractor proposing to complete the installation. Temporary cut slopes and shoring must comply with the provisions of Title 296 WAC, Part N, "Excavation, Trenching and Shoring." Sedimentation and Erosion Control In our opinion, the erosion potential of the on-site soils is low to moderate. Construction activities including stripping and grading will expose soils to the erosional effects of wind and water. The amount and potential impacts of erosion are partly related to the time of year that construction actually occurs. Wet weather construction will increase the amount and extent of erosion and potential sedimentation. Erosion and sedimentation control measures may be implemented by using a combination of interceptor swales, straw bale barriers, silt fences and straw mulch for temporary erosion protection of exposed soils. All disturbed areas should be finish graded and seeded as soon as practicable to reduce the risk of erosion. Erosion and sedimentation control measures should be installed and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the City of Renton. Pavement Recommendations Subgrade Preparation We recommend that the subgrade soils in new pavement and parking areas be evaluated as described above in the "Subgrade Preparation" portion of the "Earthwork" section of this report. We recommend that the upper 12 inches of the existing site soils be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD estimated in general accordance with ASTM ❑ 1557 prior to placing pavement section materials. If the subgrade soils are loose or soft, it may be necessary to excavate the soils and replace them with structural fill. A layer of suitable woven geotextile fabric may be placed over soft subgrade areas to limit the thickness of structural fill required to bridge soft, yielding areas. Asphalt Pavement In light-duty pavement areas (for example, automobile parking), we recommend a pavement section consisting of at least a 2 -inch -thick layer of 1/2 -inch hot mix asphalt (HMA) (PG 58-22) conforming to Sections 5-04 and 9-03 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications, over a 6 -inch -thick layer of densely compacted crushed rock base course conforming to Section 9-03.9(3) of the WS❑OT Standard Specifications. In heavy-duty pavement areas (for example, truck traffic and Page 12 November 2, 2011 GeoEngineers, Inc. 4e 10. 1784-015 00 RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Re Washington materials delivery areas) around the building, we recommend a pavement section consisting of at least a 3 -inch -thick layer of 1/2 -inch HMA (PG 58-22) over a 6 -inch -thick layer of densely compacted crushed rock base course. We recommend that proof -rolling of the compacted base course be observed by a representative from our firm prior to paving. Soft or yielding areas observed during proof -rolling may require over -excavation and replacement with compacted structural fill. The pavement sections recommended above are based on our experience with similar building developments. Thicker asphalt sections may be needed based on the actual traffic data, intended use and performance expectations. Portland Cement Concrete Pavement GeoEngineers understands that portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement might be considered for some areas. We recommend that these pavements consist of at least 6 inches of PCC over 4 inches of crushed surfacing base course. This pavement section should bear on a subgrade prepared as described above. The base course should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD estimated in general accordance with ASTM D 1557. We recommend that PCC pavements incorporate construction joints and/or crack control joints that are spaced maximum distances of 12 feet apart, center -to -center, in both the longitudinal and transverse directions. Crack control joints may be created by placing an insert or groove into the fresh concrete surface during finishing, or by sawcutting the concrete after its initial setup. We recommend that the depth of the crack control joints be approximately one-fourth the thickness of the concrete, or about 11/2 inches deep for the recommended concrete thickness of 6 inches. We also recommend that the crack control joints be sealed with an appropriate sealant to help restrict water infiltration into the joints. Recommended Additional Geotechnical Services Throughout this report, recommendations are provided where we consider additional geotechnical services to be appropriate. These additional services are summarized below: ■ GeoEngineers should be retained to prepare the ground improvement plan and specifications once the foundation loading and layout has been finalized. • GeoEngineers should be retained to review the project plans and specifications when complete to confirm that our design recommendations have been implemented as intended. ■ During construction, GeoEngineers should observe the installation of the ground improvement, evaluate the suitability of the foundation subgrades, observe and test structural backfill, observe installation of subsurface drainage measures and provide a summary letter of our construction observation services. The purposes of GeoEngineers construction phase services are to confirm that the subsurface conditions are consistent with those observed in the explorations and other reasons described in Appendix C, Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use. GMENGINEERS November 2, 2011 Page 13 File No, 1764 01500 RENTON DOWN LIBRARY Renton, Washington LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by King County Library System, Miller Hull, Coughlin Porter and Lundeen, and members of the design team for use in design of this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the field of geotechnical engineering in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Please refer to Appendix C titled Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use for additional information pertaining to use of this report. REFERENCES ASCE 7-05, 2006. "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures," American Society of Civil Engineers, January1, 2006. City of Seattle, 2003, "Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction." International Code Council, 2009, "International Building Code." U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highways Administration, 2006, "Reference Manual Volume II, Ground Improvement Methods" FHWA Report No. FHWA-NHI-06-020. U.S. Geological Survey - National Seismic hazard Mapping project Software "Earthquake Ground Motion Parameters, Version 5.0.9x," 2002 data, 2009. Ishihara, K., and Yoshimine, M., "Evaluation of Settlements in Sand Deposits Following Liquefaction During Earthquakes," Soils and Foundations, 32(1), 1992, pp. 173-188. Tokimatsu, K., and Seed, H.B., "Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE,113(GT8), 1987, pp. 861-878. Youd, et al., "Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils," Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, October 2001, pp. 817-833. Page 14 November2, 2011 GeoEngineers, Inc. FEe No. 1784415-00 S 117Th Si d NE 10Th St S 117Th St i St-- d - _ 'iJt) NE 9Th PI 5 118Th St S 118Th St NE 9Th St c 8r n-Mawrl�ark.- sL- NF8rh i %` '� - r; N 8Th S1 Sr n CO ¢ S 121St St m, --- z• Nirghlands m m S121Sist _ rn ¢ a - ¢v S123Rd St- S 122Nd St - mi Nr7Th St @� St > " NS123Rd P1- -5124ThSt �_.�-..5124ThSt 67 - - J -N 6Th St ti ¢ = I Al 5�125ThSt ' S 'm 2 . E J S",B ¢ 5Th t z j .c ' Z � - m - ¢ a LU AIM , �5�2S� a' v z m f H z 8ThSt - , m t. - z Z m N 4Th St >�ndsor, , ilfs Park In ¢ y 81130Th'St -...._ S 130Th St 65 r c E - .--a- N 3Rd St i-.. . NE �Er3 . 1 I S 132Nd S[-- m E 3 I ' � 'N •lS1-St- - _. `"`S'132Nd St - S Tilfiarm St. 'Y S' N. -2N St _LU - I y _ -S-TobimSt— Sts m l 5 SW Uictona St �p N-strmn Park •� 3Srn ..' � , 134th St SW 2 1N Jones rk Libert .._U V7,BlackRiver �� $m c Site �� ¢°"��m CsdarRive ark t $ pm ... Farlington Par'r3 E i.NalS' 16926 C1 0 n - _.' S 3Rd PI c SW4Frrp a @ 54Th St-: �� c w o �'=Tcmkin P Ra iparan sj SW57hCt N Sa�hsa1 S5ThSt, c m i d .2 South Burnett Li arka iv•1t+iew -- r U) _N. -- SWTThStS7ThS1 a - �� Blackniver E �S. BPI E v $ E,radYAal PhillipAmold, F50 CL m `m to �, St1 � t SW 50 � t2Yr5t 5 Renton Village PI c ; o 41 ��S ..SiN13'St ,..g54Sh51_ 15 € a4� t h -- ,SW 16Th St ......... SWIIII h , . ..__ .. - ` S i15Th,St @ "o a n Le a Street Parii �+ `3 � sin t� SE 16Th PI . 5 3 S 16ThiS1 ° '7g2. - tw , SW 19Th St c ➢ <� hs I �Q IQ CO m m o d J d' di W %_S J 7! S CO� us Q � �I rA E'tgT r Qf - a-SW19Th St x fi h p Q ? S 19Th St L7 _ ISTA)baf ill ParkSW,23RdS1 St'St - SE 22Nd St l .00 r* r �' r``•'Seat a ...' y N Cassns Xing .. �� D , 18 v .1fi7 ., 2,000 0 2,000 13 ,aa r ; M1 78 Feet Tacoma ` 4 I Notes: Vicinity Map 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master Renton Downtown Library file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of Renton Washington this communication. } E3. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for 8 personal use or resale, without permission. Data SourcesESRI bora &Maps, Street Maps 2005 m G Eo E N G I N E E R Figure 1 U Transverse Mercator, Zone 10 N North, North Arriedcan Datum 1963 8 North arrow oriented to grid north LOGANAVE S m 0 m Z CD 7 m a N m r o Q � y T_ 10 I � i I 4 40 N � V. APPENDIX A Field Explorations ` RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY " ntan, Washingtan APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS General We explored subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the site by advancing two cone penetration test (CPT) probes (CPT -1 and GPT -2). The CPTs were completed to depths ranging from 26 feet to 39 feet below the existing ground surface using truck -mounted equipment owned and operated by In situ Engineering. CPT -1 and CPT -2 were completed on September 29, 2011. The locations of the explorations were estimated by measuring distances from site features through taping/pacing in the field, and should be considered approximate. The locations of the explorations are shown on the Site Plan (Figure 2). Cane Penetration Tests The CPT is a subsurface exploration technique in which a small -diameter steel tip with adjacent sleeve is continuously advanced with hydraulically operated equipment. Measurements of tip and sleeve resistance allow interpretation of the soil profile and the consistency of the strata penetrated. The tip, sleeve resistance and pore water pressure is recorded on the CPT logs. The logs of the CPT probes are presented in Figures A-1 and A-2. The CPT probes were advanced to depths ranging from 26 feet to 39 feet below the existing ground surface. The CPT probes were backfilled in general accordance with procedures outlined by the Washington State Department of Ecology. GEoENGINEERSNovemher2,2011 ! Page A•1 File No. 17H4 015-00 GeoEngineers Operator- CPT DateTane AfIarAl l 1032-40 AM foundi,¢ Cr --Dl Locabon: RmbnDo,nrda Libary Cane Used: DfIG1187 Jab % ber. 17@4-015-00 Tip Resisiaree Friconi Ratio Pore Pressure Soil BehWiorType- SAT N' Qt T3F FrJQt(Xj PM PSI Zane-UBC•1383 8C% Hamner 0 tm U 1U -la n U 1'l U 72-7 0 � 1 i i r, � i -_r • t _, 2- t I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 r I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i I 1 1 1 !I!1! ii 1111{{ i iii it li iii I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I F I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIE II 111111 IIIII IIII1111 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1!! 1! 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 [! 1 -�-r-r--r•�--7•-r- r����-r r�����-r ��TTr Trl -1,?-rr I l l l l l r 1 1114111 i3 IIIIII 4111111 11111111 ! ! ! ! ! 1 1 1 I I l 1 1 1 1 t l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 [ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l k I l Y l l l l 11111111 11 11111 1114111111 111111114 1 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 !I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 -1--i--+-----;--+- +aa�a�-� +a as a_1_ Llia��iia +4a a4 -V -F r l l 4 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 4 1 1 1 1 11111111 11 �II1111 IIII Illll lift I I 1 i I 1 1 I I I I I I I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I F l I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 f 1 I! 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 4 1 I k I 1 1 1 1 I I I k F 1 1 I I I 1 1 11111111 IfY1111111 II 111111 I I I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ijl 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I l r I l t l l l l l I I I I 1 I 1 t I I I I 1 I I f r l l l l l 1 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -r -y --r- r-ti--�--r- tt���ti-r r�ffffffl�-���-1- ��yyy-rr I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1!1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111111 II!!!_.1111111 II 111 I I I1yy 1 1 1 F 1 1 k 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 �1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 I� I I I F I EIIIII III II \1111111 II 111111 I 20f -L_J__1__1_ 11JJJJ_L 1 JJJJJ_ �{,(,�J,,r� ♦111 11J _LL D- I 1 1 1 1 1 1 E IIIIIIII 111111 1 1 1 1 1 L{ 1 1 Ittllt ( II II11 III I I I I I I 1I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1, 1 1 41111 1.1 11 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'i I I I I I I I I rl 11 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 25 IIIIIIII full lttllll 11 11111111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1! 1 1 If I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIII IlEllll II IIII III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I l t 1 1 1��1A11q 1! r f t! 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I IIyj 11 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIII !1111111 1111 II 111111 1i-1-1 I T T I I T 1 11 111 1 1 1 1 ! I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 rTFL 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 I I I I 11111111 ll1iL',11-1 11111 111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 htTf1 1 1 I I II 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I[ 8, 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 11 LI 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I if I I y�r'1-Yrl I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I'F.11I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I l�T 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 11 J J JJ_L 1JJJ JJ_I_ 111 1 JJJ_LL 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 If I 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I If 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 i l l l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I k l l l l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 40 I� I I I 1 I IIIIIIIII LI V111111 II 11111 III 1 1 jjj1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 `A I k 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 �T' I .11111111 11111111 1 111111 III I I I I I��Jl 11111111 I 111111 I II1111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1! 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 T—.. 1 1 1 if 1 III 1 1 1 bmcim Depl1 - 382+ feet Depth txaemc,t - OAS4 feet 1 sensible fine grained 4 s 2-y day to gay ■ 7 s4ty sand to sandy sift ■ 10 garegy sand b sand ■ 2 mgani matrrial 5 clayey sift to silty day 13 sand to city sand ■ 11 very stiff fire grained (`) ■ a day ■ a Swdy sat to c ayey sh 3 sand ■ U sand to clayey sand(') tr1.slhttsgnetrxlg sdl beha,Aor type ane � base! on oat: tram u3C.199: Log of CPT -1 Renton Downtown Library Renton, Washington GEoENGiNEER� Figure A-1 a eoEngineer.. Operator: aro" C'T DataTimw 872912011 11:27:23 AM Sound. qi CPT -02 Location iianian Dcmcd :Mei Library Cope Used- OPG1187 Job Nunber. 17:34-015400 Tap Resistance Friction Ratio Pore Presmm Scfi 9eha%w Type- SAT H• u 15r rs ut lam! Yw rsr toe- UbL-1yt17 aux -lanTr r 0 801 0 10 -15 35 0 12 0 50 0 T �I IJ I 1 1 1 � I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r f l 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11141111 II 111114 1111 1 1 11 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 { I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 I I I I 1 ! 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 ! 1 tll llllli !1 FIIIII IIIII Illll II I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I II I r 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I k I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 11 I l k l l 11 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1----T--r---T--T- II 111111 T1��1'r II IIIIII T 1Z�1-1- 11111 1TTTT 11111 IF 71111--r 1 1 ! 1 I 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 11 1 1 1 1 ] 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1{ 1 1 1 F I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1{ 1 r l l l l I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1111!1 II IIIII 111111 IIIII II 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Ir 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I! I I 1+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F 1111111! II 1`11111 1111111 111111 II TC 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 ! I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I! 1 I I 1 1 1 IIIIII 111,I I I 1 IIIII I I II I I I I 011 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •! ! I f 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I '111111111 I I + 1 1 1 1 1 1 II rllllll I l r [ll k;.Fl l�lll I I I I I I I I I IIf 1I 1 1 1 1 ! I I 11111111 111111 II11 1111 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l l k l I I I 1 1 1 1 1 r r I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I M I I I I 1 1 1 I 1` I I I I I I I III I I 1 1-!'r 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I II 1 11-1 1 1 t111ti-r yyy�ti- tr t - 1 fl 1 1 I I I I�11 /11111 11 111111 1 11ri r{:Lt III 111111 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 li 1_.► Pi� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 11111111 Il�llllil II IIII II I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I� I 1 1 1 1 111111111 II 111111 II 111111 i M Depth `� 1_ ° _1__L_J__1__L_ 1 1JJJ JJ -L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I I 1 1 1 11 1JJJ-1_ I !, 1 1 1 1 LL 1 11JJJJ!LL. 1 1 1 1 1 1 i t tft� r 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1! 1 1 1 I Ill 1 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l I�F4+L 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r r 1 K I I I I 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1`11 I I I I 111E IIIIII 111111111 II 111111 I I I Ill I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 e I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 { 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ++ fi�1— + ���—I— H ♦iiia --f I I I IWL 1 I it I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 1 4! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 4! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1! r 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I l l k l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III IIIIII II IIIIIII 11111111111 111111 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 { 1 1 - III IIIIII 1 1 1 I I I! 1 1 II IIIIIII I I I l r l l l l 11111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I ' 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1! 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 If1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I F I I 11 TT 111144 71111'1'1- rl-7T,, TTr 4'1111--r 44' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l l l i l I I I I I I I I I I I 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I E 4 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 1 l{ I l l l 1 4 1 1 1 1 I 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I l l l l ill I l i 4 4 1 1 1 1 I l 1 1 1 1 I 1 l I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1{ 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1! 1 1 1 F I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 E t I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I t ! f 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 ! ! I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I _I__J__L__L_J__1__L_ 11JJJJ_L 1JJJJJ—I,• 1JJ JJ --L 1 1 1 1 E I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I l I I I I I I I I I IL0 $ $ $1$ 0 $ 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 [ I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I IIIIII 11 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1! I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1! I I I I I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I l l k l l l 111111111 111111111 Ikllllkllll 111111 11 1 1 1 r I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l l i E l l l l l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f f 1 r I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 x 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Umimt,arl DeptF = 2829 Leet Dep1h Increment = 7.164 feet 1 xrcibvc fna grancd ■ 4 =xy day to day ■ 7 sft) sand lo sandy sdk M10 grnr_®y ; d m send 2 olyalrc nakrial 5 dayey silt to sity day 8 sand fn silty sand 11 very sill fine willed ■ 3 day ■ 6 sandy silt to dayey sit a 9 sand ■ 12 sand to dayey sand {'} aulm c1y11UWbPj SW bl LwW ype art SPT o9 an MU f m Ufi41983 Log of CPT- 2 Renton Downtown Library Renton, Washington GMENGINEER Figure A-2 Mix B Audies RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY "enton, Washington APPENDIX B PREVIOUS STUDIES This appendix presents the logs of two borings included in the report by Geotech Consultants, Inc. titled "Proposed Mixed -Use Building, 2XX Logan Avenue South in Renton, Washington," dated August 26, 1997. See Figure 2 for the approximate locations of the borings. GEoENGINEER5 November2, 2011 l Page B-1 File No, 1784-015 UQ 5 10 15 30 25 30 35 40 4 2 In 14 32 11 BORING 2 FILL grown, silty SAND, very moist, loose (FILL) ::: Brown, low plasticity SILT, with fine SAND, very moist, loose - becomes sandier - becomes gray, wet, very loose = Gray and brown SAND, medium -grained, with trace silt, wet, medium -dense 5: Brown SAND, with wood, fine- to medium -grained, wet, medium - dense log encountered e°e°o°o°o 47 °e°e °a°° Brown, slightly silty, gravelly SAND, wet, dense :::[ sP - becomes coarser -grained, heavily iron stained 71110 Sr - e°e eo eoeoo o e e e e Test boring was terminated at 41.5 feet below grade on 8-13-97. Groundwater seepage was encountered at 18 feet during drilling. �� GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. TEST BORING LOG 2XX "LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON Job No: Date: Logged by: Pate: 97281 AUGUST 1997 JHS 4 5 I0 15 20 25 30 35 40 1 5 FILL X 11 � 24 18 41 46 59 BORING 4 ,,,2" AC/Y CRB Brown, very silty SAND, fine-grained, moist, loose (FILL) becomes very moist becomes gray, wet Brown, silty SAND, with iron stains, fine- to medium -grained, moist, medium -dense ray SAND, fine- to medium -grained, wet, medium -dense With Some 51St and iron -stained lenscs and brown, gravelly SAND, wet, dense Test boring was terminated at 41.5 feet below ;rade on 8-12-97. Groundwater seepage was encountered at 8 feet during drilliner. GEGTECH CONS ULTA NTS, INC. TEST BORING LOG 2XX LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON Job No: Date: Cogged by: Plate: 97281 AUGUST 1997 JHS 6 - / / � > � APPENDIX C Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use \ ` ` � .. - J. k \ , \ �\ \ `\ .'-----~ RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Renton, Y' hington APPENDIX C REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE' This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report. Geotechnical Services are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons and Projects This report has been prepared for use by King County Library System, Coughlin, Porter and Lundeen, and members of the design team for use in the design of this project. This report may be made available to prospective contractors for bidding or estimating purposes; but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. This report is not intended for use by others, and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients. For example, a geotechnical or geologic study conducted for a civil engineer or architect may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer or architect that are involved in the same project. Because each geotechnical or geologic study is unique, each geotechnical engineering or geologic report is unique, prepared solely for the specific client and project site. No one except King County Library Systems, Coughlin, Porter and Lundeen, and members of the design team should rely on this report without first conferring with GeoEngineers. This report should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. A Geotechnical Engineering or geologic Report is Based on A Unique Set of Project -Specific Factors This report has been prepared for the Renton Downtown Library that will be located at 508 S 3rd Street in Renton, Washington. GeoEngineers considered a number of unique, project -specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on this report if it was: • not prepared for you, ■ not prepared for your project, ■ not prepared for the specific site explored, or rr completed before important project changes were made. For example, changes that can affect the applicability of this report include those that affect: ■ the function of the proposed structure; ■ elevation, configuration, location, orientation or weight of the proposed structure; ■ composition of the design team; or rr project ownership. 1 Developed based on material provided by ASFE, Professional Firms Practicing in the Geosciences; www.asfe.org. GEoENGINEERS November2,2011 I PageC-1 File Ye. 1784-018-00 RENTON TOWN LIBRARY Renton, Washington If important changes are made after the date of this report, GeoEngineers should be given the opportunity to review our interpretations and recommendations and provide written modifications or confirmation, as appropriate. Subsurface Conditions Can Change This geotechnical or geologic report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. The findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time, by manmade events such as construction on or adjacent to the site, or by natural events such as floods, earthquakes, slope instability or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact GeoEngineers before applying a report to determine if it remains applicable. Most Geotechnical and Geologic Findings are Professional Opinions Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on the Cone Penetration Tests results completed at the site. Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted. GeoEngineers reviewed historic field and laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from those indicated in this report. Our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Geotechnical Engineering Report Recommendations are Not Final Do not over -rely on the preliminary construction recommendations included in this report. These recommendations are not final, because they were developed principally from GeoEngineers' professional judgment and opinion. GeoEngineers' recommendations can be finalized only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. GeoEngineers cannot assume responsibility or liability for this report's recommendations if we do not perform construction observation. Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by GeoEngineers should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork activities are completed in accordance with our recommendations. Retaining GeoEngineers for construction observation for this project is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A Geotechnical Engineering or Geologic Report Could Be Subject to Misinterpretation Misinterpretation of this report by other design team members can result in costly problems. You could lower that risk by having GeoEngineers confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain GeoEngineers to review pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering or geologic report. Reduce that risk by having GeoEngineers participate in pre-bid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation. Page C-2 November 2, 2011 GeoEngineers, lne. File "Fn. 1184-015-00 ., L RENTON DOWNTOWN LIBRARY Renton, " --hington Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete geotechnical engineering or geologic report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with GeoEngineers and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A pre-bid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might an owner be in a position to give contractors the best information available, while requiring them to at least share the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Further, a contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in your project budget and schedule. Contractors Are Responsible For Site Safety on Their Own Construction Projects Our geotechnical recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's procedures, methods, schedule or management of the work site. The contractor is solely responsible for job site safety and for managing construction operations to minimize risks to on-site personnel and to adjacent properties. Read These Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices (geotechnical engineering or geology) are far less exact than other engineering and natural science disciplines. This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could lead to disappointments, claims and disputes. GeoEngineers includes these explanatory "limitations" provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" apply to your project or site. Geotechnical, Geologic and Environmental Reports Should Not Be Interchanged The equipment, techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Similarly, environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns regarding a specific project. Biological Pollutants GeoEngineers' Scope of Work specifically excludes the investigation, detection, or assessment of the presence of Biological Compounds which are Pollutants in or around any structure. Accordingly, this report includes no interpretations, recommendations, findings, or conclusions for the purpose of detecting, assessing, or abating Biological Pollutants. The term "Biological Pollutants" includes, but is not limited to, molds, fungi, spores, bacteria, and viruses, and/or any of their byproducts. GEOENGINEER-5 November 2, 2011 i Page C-3 File No. 1784-015.00 Have we delivered World Class Client Service? Please let us know by visiting www. geoengineers.com/feedback. GMENGINEERS Ltl,4I 2 -- City Of Renton LAND USE ERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: City of Renton (contact Peter Renner) ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98057 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425.430.6605 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Greg Smith COMPANY (if applicable): King County Library System ADDRESS: 960 Newport Way NW CITY: Issaquah, WA ZIP: 98027 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425.369.3237 CONTACT PERSON NAME: Maaike Post COMPANY (if applicable): Miller Hull Partnership ADDRESS: 71 Columbia St. — sixth floor CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP. 98104-1031 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: 206.682.6837 mpost@millerhull.com PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Renton Library PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 510 South 3rd Street Renton, Wa 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 569600-0005 Existing 'Gateway Park' 784180-0705 Existing Surface Parking 784180-0195 Existing Commercial Building EXISTING LAND USE(S): Park, Surface parking (commercial), Big -box retail PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Park, Cultural Facility (Library) EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: UC -D (Urban Center Downtown) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable) NIA EXISTING ZONING: CD - Center Downtown PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NIA SITE AREA (in square feet): 24,070 SF total SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: NIA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable) NIA NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) NIA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NIA C:1UserslprennerlAppDatalLocaC�MicrosoftlWindows\Temporary Internet pileslContent.OutlnolaNlV09Vtl.1104 - masterapp,doc F 1JECT INFORMA NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): '15,083 SF (gross) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL- BUILDINGS (if applicable): 15,083 SF (gross) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): 5-7 (approximate) TION cont...jed PROJECT VALUE: $9 million IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): NIA ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach lenal description on separate sheet with the followinta information included) SITUATED IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23, RANGE 5, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) `r V_eyt �ef- , declare under penalty of perjury under the ws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representati to act for a car ration (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained d he infarmati erewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. �fZ_L/(?. Signature of Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �'4e signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. Date = No Public i 'an the State of Washington Notary (Print): G 5 ' 2:2 My appointment expires: C:lUscrslprcnncr\AppDatalLocallMicrosoftlWindowsJemporary Internet FileslContent.OutlooklNIV09VUA04 - masterapp. doe - 2 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach lenal description on separate sheet with the followinta information included) SITUATED IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23, RANGE 5, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) `r V_eyt �ef- , declare under penalty of perjury under the ws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representati to act for a car ration (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained d he infarmati erewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. �fZ_L/(?. Signature of Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �'4e signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instrument. Date = No Public i 'an the State of Washington Notary (Print): G 5 ' 2:2 My appointment expires: C:lUscrslprcnncr\AppDatalLocallMicrosoftlWindowsJemporary Internet FileslContent.OutlooklNIV09VUA04 - masterapp. doe - 2 - Pk _JJECT INFORMATION (cont,.,ued) RENTON LIBRARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE: LOTS 3 THROUGH 5 BLOCK 6, SMITHER'S SIXTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 26 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, AND LOT 1 BLOCK 1 OF MOTORLINE ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAN THEREOF RECORDED IN VOUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, ALL SITUATED IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23, RANGE 5, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CaUserslprennerlAppDalalLocal\Microsoft\Windowsl7'etnporary Internet FileslContent.OLdlook\NIV09VU]I04 - masterapp.doc .3 - PREAPP"fiCATION MEETING FM0fr RENTON LIBRARY o° 523 S 3RD ST R 9 7 2.�,z CITY OF RENTON hece§VeDo Department of Community and Economic Development Planning Division PRE12-004 January 26, 2012 Contact Information: Planner Rocale Timmons Phone: 425.430.7219 Public Works Reviewer: Jan Illian Phone: 425.430.7216 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Dave Pargas Phone: 425.430.7023 Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell Phone: 425.430.7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use and/or environmental permits. Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre -application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director, Development Services Director, Department of Community and Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council). FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 'PCity of._` rr M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 17, 2012 TO: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Renton Library 1. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,250 gpm based on a fully fire sprinklered building. Three fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed building and two hydrants are required within 300 -feet. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet current code including 5 -inch storz fittings. It appears adequate fire flow exists in this area. Proposed new hydrant shall be within 50 feet of the fire department sprinkler connection, probably move it towards the intersection with Logan Avenue. Fire sprinkler DDCVA assembly shall be located in an outside vault unless the distance from the water main to the device is less than 50 -feet, which it is not in your current proposal. 2. The fire mitigation impact fees are currently applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building area. Credit would be granted for the existing building to be removed. 3. Both an approved fire alarm and fire sprinkler system is required throughout the building. Separate plans and permits are required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for review and permitting_ Fire alarm system shall be fully addressable and full detection is required. A direct outside door is required to the fire sprinkler riser control room. 4. An annual place of assembly permit is required for occupancies exceeding 50 persons. An automated external defibrillator (AED) is required if the occupancy load exceeds 300 persons. 5. Fire department apparatus access is adequate. 6. An electronic site plan is required to be submitted to the Renton Fire Department for pre -fire planning purposes prior to occupancy of the building. See attached sheet for the format in which to submit your plans. Renton Fire Department Pre Fire Planning In an effort to streamline our pre -fire process, we are requesting that you submit a site plan of your construction project in one of the following formats which we can then convert to VISIO.vsd. This is required to be submitted prior to occupancy. ABC Flowcharter.af3 ABC Flowcharter.aU Adobe Illustrator File.ai AutoCad Drawin .dw AutoCad Drawing.dgn Computer Graphics Metaftle.c Corel Cli art Format.cmx Corel DRAW! Drawing File Format.edr Corel Flow.cfl Encapsulated Postscript File.e s Enhanced Metafile.emf IGES Drawing File Format.i s Graphics Interchange Format. if Macintosh PICT Format t Micro Designer Ver 3.l.drw Micro afx Designer Ver 6.4.dsf Microstation Drawing.4fm Portable Network Graphics Format. of Postscript File. s Tag Image File Format.tif Text.txt Text.csv VISIO.vsd Windows Bitma .bm Windows Bitma .dib Windows Metafile.wmf Zsoft PC Paintbrush Bion .cx c.\userslrtirnmonslappdatallocal\microsoftlwindowsltemporary internet Ries\content.outiooklo8k6733ollibrary.doc DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY d a� AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 25, 2012 TO: Rocale Timmons, Planner FROM: Jan Illian, Plan Review 99 SUBJECT: Renton Downtown Library 5D8 S. 3`a Street PRE 12-004 NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non- binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision -makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. I have completed a preliminary review for the above -referenced proposal. The following comments are based on the pre -application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. WATER 1. There is an existing 12 -inch water main in S. P Street. The available derated fire flow from the 12 - inch main fronting the site in S. and Street exceeds 3,000 gpm. Pressure available is approximately 65 psi. The proposed project is outside an Aquifer Protection Zone. 2. The preliminary fire flow requirement per the Fire Marshal's office is 2,250 gpm. All new construction must have fire hydrants capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm each. One primary hydrant is required within 150 feet from the buildings and three additional hydrants will be required within 30O feet of the buildings. 3. There are existing fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project, but are subject to verification for being within the required distance and require fire department approval. One new hydrant is required and it is shown on the plan; however, final design will require the fire department connection to be within 50 feet of the new hydrant. Any existing hydrants counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting if not already in place. 4. Water system development (SDC) fees are based on the size of the domestic water meter, fire service line, and landscape irrigation meter that will serve the site. Credit will be given for the existing f- inch domestic meter that currently serves the existing building. Fees are payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. See fee schedule attached. Renton Library—PRE 12-004 Page 2 of 3 January 25, 2412 S. A double check valve assembly (CVA) will be required to be installed inline of the domestic water meter to the new building. 5. A fire sprinkler system will be required by the fire department. A separate no -fee utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler line. 7. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List" of Backflow Prevention Devices. Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note: "Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required." DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with City of Renton Standards. For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building, applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab. Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. SANITARY SEWER 1. There is an 8 -inch sewer main located along the north property line. 2. Sewer system development fees are based on the size of the domestic water meter that will serve the site. Credit will be given for the existing 1 -inch water meter serving the building. The sewer fee will be based on the difference between the 1 -inch and 1.5 inch meters. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. See fee schedule attached. 3. if food preparation facilities (kitchen, cafe, restaurant) are proposed, a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. A separate plumbing permit is required. SURFACE WATER 1. A drainage plan and drainage report will be required with the site plan application. The report shall comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2. All core and any special requirements shall be contained in the report. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard, Existing Conditions. The drainage report will need to follow the area specific flow control requirements under Core Requirement #3. 2. A geotechnical report for the site is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer shall be submitted with the application. 3. Surface Water System Development fees of $.405 per square foot of new impervious surface will apply. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. TRANSPORTAtI ON/STREET 1. A traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional generated daily trip shall be assessed as determined by the ITE trip generation manual. 2. Street improvement along 5.3'd Street shall match the existing sidewalk and lighting design improvements to the east. H:/CED/Planning/Current Planning/PREAPPS112-004.Rocale/Plan Review Comments PRE 12-004.doc Renton Library— PRE 12-004 Page 3 of 3 January 25, 2012 3. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance. if three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design, all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. Any new services shall be installed underground. GENERAL COMMENT$ 1. All construction utility permits for utilities, drainage, and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. Any proposed rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will require a separate building permit and special inspection. 3. Separate permits and fees for water meters, side sewers, and backflow devices are required. 4. A cut and cap permit to abandon the existing water meter and side sewer will be required as part of the demolition permit. H:/CEa/Planning/Current Planning/PREAPPS/12-004.Rocale/Plan Review Comments PRE 12- 4-doc DEPARTMENT OF a City of COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC] DEVELOPMENT M E M a R A N D U M DATE: January 26, 2012 TO: Pre -Application File No. 12-004 FROM: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner SUBJECF: Renton Downtown Library (510 S 3`a St) General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre -application for the above - referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.04 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.eov Project proposal: The subject property is located on the north side of 3`d Ave S between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S at 510 S 3'd St. The project site totals 0.55 acres in area and is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zone. The pre -application packet indicates that the proposal is to demolish the existing structure (formerly occupied by Big 5) and construct an approximate 15,000 square foot new library building along with associated improvements including the renovation of Gateway Park. Access to the site is proposed via an existing curb cut along Morris Ave S north of the site. There appear to be no critical areas on site. Current Use: The property currently contains an existing 12,185 square foot structure (formerly occupied by Big 5) which is proposed to be demolished. Zoning: The subject property is located within the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation. In addition, the proposal would be subject to the Design District "A" standards and guidelines. Proposals should have unique, identifiable design treatment in terms of landscaping, building design, signage and street furniture. Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-120A, "Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application (noted as "CD standards" herein). i:lrtimmons\preapps\12-Oo4 (cd downtown iibrary).doc Renton Downtown Library, P -004 Page 2 of 5 January 25; 2012 Minimum Lot Size, Width and Deoth — There are no minimum requirements for lot width or depth within the CD zone at this location. The minimum requirement, of 25,000 square feet, for lot size would not be applicable to the proposal unless the applicant is proposing to subdivide the property. Lot Coverage —There is no maximum building requirement in the CD zoning classification. Set�ks—Setbacks are the distance between the building and the property line or any private access easement. Setback requirements in the CD zone are as follows: 0 -foot minimum for the front yard setback and a 15 foot maximum front yard setback. it appears the applicant complies with the setback requirements of the zone. Encroachments into the right -of --way would be allowed with a Right -of --Way Use Permit. Gross floor Area — There is no minimum requirements for gross floor area within the CD zone. Building Height —The maximum building height that would be allowed in the % zone is 50 feet. Based on the conceptual elevations provided the proposed structure is compliant with the height limits of the zone. Building elevations and detailed descriptions of elements and building materials are required with your site plan review submittal. Screening — Screening must be provided for all surface -mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment. The site plan application will need to include elevations and details for the proposed methods of screening. Refuse and Recycling Areas — Refuse and recycling areas need to meet the requirements of RMC 4-4-090, "Refuse and Recyclables Standards" (enclosed). For office, educational, and institutional developments a minimum of 2 square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for recyclable deposit areas and a minimum of 4 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas with a total minimum area of 100 square feet.. Based on the proposal for a total of 15,000 square feet space, a minimum area of 100 square feet of refuse and recycle area would be required. The location of the proposed refuse and recyclable area appears to comply with the standards outlined above. The sizing of the proposed refuse and recycle area could not be verified with the materials submitted. Landsca in — Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with native, drought -resistant vegetative cover. The development standards require that all pervious areas within the property boundaries be landscaped. The minimum on-site landscape width required along street frontages is 10 feet, except where reduced through the site plan development review process. Rased on the proposal the applicant would be required to request a modification through the site plan review process in order to reduce the 10 -foot landscaping requirement along S 3'4 St. A modification would likely be supported as long as the applicant is able to demonstrate that wherever possible the placement of street trees are provided. Further landscaping requirements can be found below in the Design Guidelines. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) for additional general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). A conceptual landscape pian and landscape analysis meeting the requirements In RMC 4-8-120D.12, shall be submitted at the time of application for Site Plan Review. i.\rtimmons\preapps\12-004 (cd downtown library).doc Renton Downtown Library, 2-004 Page 3 of 5 January 26, 2012 Tree Preservation — A tree inventory and a tree retention pian along with a tree retention worksheet shall be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show preservation of at least 5 percent of significant trees. If the trees cannot be retained, they may be replaced with minimum 2 inch caliper trees at a rate of six to one. Fences — If the applicant intends to install any fences as part of this project, the location must be designated on the landscape plan. A fence detail should also be included on the plan as well. Parkin -- For the purposes of parking calculations a library is considered a cultural facility. The following ratios would be applicable to the site: Use Square Foo eof Use Ratio Require dSpa ces Library 15,000 Min/Max: 40 spaces / Min/Max:600 1,000 SF The applicant is proposing to add 6 stalls to tyre exrsrrng parking #ar. rc appeun arrc rApp,r—r,t would not meet the stall requirement for a cultural facility. Where practical difficulties exist in meeting parking requirements, the applicant may request a modification from -these standards. The applicant will be required at the time of formal land use application to provide detailed parkinp, information i.e. stall and drive aisle dimensions and calculations of the subiect site. Staff would be supportive of a parking modification in order to reduce the number of stalls required for the new library. It should be noted that the parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions. Surface parking stalls must be a minimum of 9 feet x 20 feet, compact dimensions of 8%: feet x 16 feet, and parallel stall dimensions of 9 feet x 23 feet; compact surface parking spaces shall not account far more than 30 percent of the spaces in the surface parking lots. ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length, with an adjacent access aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces. The appropriate amount of ADA accessible stalls based on the total number of spaces must be provided. Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070 and RMC 4-4MOF.7) for further general and specific landscape requirements (enclosed). Additionally, the proposal would need to be revised in order to provide bicycle parking based on 10 9 of the required number of parking stalls. Access— Driveway widths are limited by the driveway standards, in RMC 4-40801. Pedestrian Access -- A pedestrian connection shall be provided from all public entrances to the street, in order to provide direct, clear and separate pedestrian walks from sidewalks to building entries and internally from buildings to abutting properties. it appears the proposal provides adequate pedestrian connections to public spaces and streets" Buildin Desi n Standard —Compliance with Urban Design Regulations, District'A; is required along the eastern facade. See the attached checklist and Renton Municipal Code section 443- 100. The following bullets are a few of the standards outlined in the regulations. 1. A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing a street, shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human -scale elements. i.\rtimmons\preapps\12-004 (cd downtown library).doc Renton Downtown Library, P -004 Page 4 of 5 January 26, 2012 2. Facades shall be articulated and vehicular entrances to nonresidential or mixed use parking structures shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other architectural elements and/or materials. 3. Pedestrian pathways within parking lots or parking modules shall be differentiated by material or texture from abutting paving materials. 4. Site furniture shall be provided and shall be made of durable, vandal- and weather - resistant materials that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an extended period of time. 5. Amount of common space or recreation area to be provided is minimum fifty (50) square feet per unit. 6. All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than forty feet (40'). 7. Human -scaled elements such as alighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape feature shall be provided along the facade's ground floor. S. Lighting shall also be provided on building facades (such as sconces) and/or to illuminate other key elements of the site such as specimen trees, other significant landscaping, water features, and/or artwork. Based on elevations provided it appears the applicant has not compiled with all of the prescriptive standards of the Design District. However, on the basis of individual merle, the proposal appears to meet the overall intent of the minimum standards and guidelines, and is a creative design that achieves the purpose of the design regulations. Environmental Review The proposed project would be subject to Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SERA) review due to the size of the proposed structure. Therefore, an environmental checklist is a submittal requirement. An environmental determination will be made by the Renton Environmental Review Committee. This determination is subject to appeal by either the project proponent, by a citizen of the community, or another entity having standing for an appeal. Permit Requirements The proposal would require Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit review along with Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review. The purpose of the Site Plan process is the detailed arrangement of project elements so as to be compatible with the physical characteristics of a site and with the surrounding area. An additional purpose of Site Plan is to ensure quality development consistent with City goals and policies. General review criteria includes the following: a. Compliance and Consistency. Conformance with plans, policies, regulations and approvals, including: b. Off -Site Impacts. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses. c. On -Site Impacts. Mitigation of impacts to the site d. Access and Circulation. Safe and efficient access and circulation for all users. is\rt!mrnons\preapps\12-004 (cd downtown library).doc Renton Downtown Library, 12-004 Page 5 of 5 January 26, 2012 e. Open Space. Incorporation of public and private open spaces to serve as distinctive project focal points and to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users of the site; f. Views and Public Access. Provision of view corridors to shorelines and Mt. Rainier, incorporates public access to shorelines, and arranges project elements to protect existing natural systems where applicable. g. Services and Infrastructure. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; h. Signage. Use of signs primarily for the purpose of identification and management of sign elements -- such as the number, size, brightness, lighting intensity, and location — to complement the visual character of the surrounding area, avoid visual clutter and distraction, and appear in proportion to the building and site to which they pertain; and i. Phasing. Inclusion of a detailed sequencing plan with development phases and estimated time frames, if applicable. The applicant will also be subject to Design Review as part of the Site Plan Review and a Design Checklist shall be completed and submitted as part of the application materials. All applications can be reviewed concurrently in an estimated time frame of 12 weeks once a complete application is accepted. The Conditional Use Permit application fee is $2,000, The Site Plan Review application fee is $2,000. The application fee for SEPA Review (Environmental Checklist) is $1,000. Modification requests are $100 each. There is an additional 3% technology fee charged at the time of land use application. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, building and sign permits would be required. The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Impact Mitigation Fees: in addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. impact fees, which would replace mitigation fees, may be adopted prior to construction. Those fees erre to be determined. ♦ A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per new daily trip attributed to the development; ♦ A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new commercial building area. Expiration: Upon site plan approval, the site plan approval is valid for two years with a possible two-year extension. i:\rtimmons`preapps\12-004 (cd downtown library).doc PLANNING DIVISION WAIVI OF SUBMITTAL REQUI1 MENTS FOR.LAND,USE APPLICATIONS it yof ao/7//� g D el7t o n E! WRI. ... .... Calculations Aymz Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND 4 Density Worksheet 4 Drainage Report 2 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services PROJECT NAME- «w—cry 2. Public Works Plan R6view 3. Building DATE: z-0 + L 4. Planning H--kCED%DataT-omr-TemplateslSelF-Help Handouts planningWvalverofsubmittalreqs'xis pgrpg PLANNING DIVISION ' WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS .FOR LAND USE.APPLICATIONS •:r ;: ..�_.";_.�.• .,.y..;.lE:;:;:;:;:E:Et;:::;1; ::1::=ij;3EE;.„;;. ,, l JL i �7j y��y�:'Ei=:i ;:;lii:::::3 $fii':i ..•1: yF. {{k i1 . Y• 4t.: •:�;• �..:E...: }•.•.1T•}-�'yk11�I[��;1J{fi�?:7.�,a•.1:j�1;1.•• ••I• •.�?'s•�l�'l:! .:i.f:•: :,E,?f:,:;: 43;:-l,.,.i �{•, - :;_ . _ ..;t-•= c y� �y ..'iip i. �•SW`ir/•.I.a . :E=�t: •: J •: t-. #4 :�:*:y.l •.:i ::i-:::::. =;::: �1 1'e] ''ii gg;; ��;;yy 1'. - i ,e.lr,�,}'i[}� :a['F .:(;71,.I~;i, ;E:i9J:Ei....... ._.j513E:C,.y. : J::i:.:J .!•.: .•.f:.,.s..r�:€Ei ° '._.: }3 � .:.•... .K•: �•e •: . ;c..•.,•;:;.o-•,Y:: _::1,.. 1:•:• ..,1, ,.. ]Yr ' :4: , :•-0d.•:•.: .:. _. ,:J.,;i;E;i.a::::•. ._ . _. _ y? �! : ii:;,,.;r,:.,.,:: ; •••.... . _.•:,.•::.• ?:_::,-• •� �[[{•ii'` -f - :•:I,y-::Y :•°':tit +�J 9•::::. -f,?1;:;';t.• _-. •: ...-! S ..:f.•:•:a.. ._ •. .f. :::7 :; ;1= :': .,1 r _;=ti•Y7• 1 ,�A. •::i:2..t..:: _ y��r ��7i� {; s:E::: :::1: ; . ,:: i::..S / ��t+r1,j; ��ll{i ::!_:E�:7 •::ai =:i; .. 7:E,:i' l l..',.,.,. t Sir... =i':.•.... .t r :;:t;• ;� i:.J.' ���€.:-:ti::l .1 ..,,i,":e•:: ..1 : iii;:.'•EEEi: 1•a:.. :._,• ti.,=t} ;'I::r I;.;.;�%a 3i; :.i. .n -..k :r .•:1::: •.•. ..:. :;-.:.•.'J.•�'s3::::^.:a:'.:.�.,;3;J:n:J::;=:Sz: ].I.,.S.:.;::.:.f.,.,. ; ._ .y..:i::;, i...i :•:•3':•:•3•r:i :•;•, •..:: � •.•3-. � .•.•: €. .•�_:',_:•:._. ••-'• i:l : .. +?i. , . J: •:'•:: :::ws.,..._;, ;;i ,i:lE€?E€:i •.3-• • E:=.;• } irR' G!-I�i�,a,Alii',a l;}J?: :��•' Eil::•. :.: s li:E:.f. ., ;... ;t...,,.,•. ...=.f. t . _ . . . Plat Name ReserMon 4 •:. [.:•: ••:. '•:l::: f :• ::�f:::=:: �y� ::ilii::-:::::__' f . 1 iy�dd y3�}� i•i il:f-•- . l s: t� - 1' - �' (: . t . }� ``�L'€'•3Y.k�4�?I�+ ' '�.. € •- _ _ _•[ S•"•1.: i•7•' - ? 1 t . 1 . l... 1!: :1.. i' .: fE j'ifE=:.=...: s ;.4.: •; 1 : .-., '. t.1� y..%:.'S:' , : _.: :• !:€E'.1,: •• ''ii •:3..•o-:::- • E. { � i ;1;=:=.J:1:4:1:::4::t:i:::ly .:i •i:i:rl:=:::•'_:_::::]_•=� .:__=:=::f•;• ::1:.• .:.i.l•: Gt:::•�1•::% :l=e=:::=r' •:•1•.:•..•:•:• � 1 : 7 _ [ _ _ Yi a:•::•1 :.y:: : �i€ � f•r..•.•l•€�.• :. :s:•]a_s_ 1�:-• i���- .1yJ� Ra}JY ::d . •-t=:= J=r•::3:f: •1 ¢;:;,?'it!:�,.ii:.;.,f;:.;.; .;.;�•.:., :.:.o -:.-hi, !z%%Eiie�etz.:..:.:•...•.• •. i. - • .•i:i•L•E•,•._I9t:;:;:isl: I 1 . . •: !- f . [.•,.:a•:• .•,t . r..t Public Works Approval Letterz :.; 5.:, :. t:: ''�, , =;j ':'' I Ii: E: i=;:3%:: . 1 ..1. _ . ' YS.: ]:1;7=: •::[.:j' ;1 is%':'i .•.1.. }�'yyam�t tFyyy�.t��ii�r'1,�, �.•�y�y� ,.FEe 4,t, . a.s•z:,. .,?.,...r•1-! 4L _ .�ciE E E;E; o-: na.l.. [.. :.:j$:... iL.. ::Is s ::::;n::ris' •z: :1 ,.E :t ::!; .. 1 1•I :. f . 3 : t .es•:i: L = . :. '= f[i 'r : '•ta:=: ?:J::::: r .iirl:i ;L••....i,...,.,.- _ .. •-t-:- ::ii:=i=:.: ,:�::;. .. i :i ei .:i;ili;,:E;:•s :; •:•l..::K:i:•::•a::: ;:i:%'';=s;>:l} .i•^;t': itiii itz;if ,S.L _ ..1.1..3:.lK..:I..=1 .._ . :•l:zs••- es::: •1•.• `l: t:;i;i;i : :_ ].: ?.:•:•; :. :•:€.1. 1 1•:•1:1 nlf:e i q.z.•.:....•.=3 .4 J t.l :1: : 'i:::l;l;;,;.,.:•['. 1.; S .•t , [;S...S...S..: -.:: =1:;:'•:_:_: f.�2�. kWtlYLir . JPGiiYXi1:::::::isj:i;1;;;;5,:;::::::!•r•::;.j:;:r7:-r-:rl:i4j1;.:; _. .r.y.:2.:.1.f=Fk€•i '{:=:'2 S =Slit : :•: ji€ � f ft ;L=.:..•:.;.. �•.-.i,�•:.•:.•{,::::::::[::' . ::S.r1:::K:.•.•:t•=:=� - - .-t•:: .:.I.:::=:[�:: ilk =:...t.,. ..... .•t•..:.�.[%::... 1. i Screening Detail 4 " •: � .: •o-. i. ! 1.: F =-t-• F •:•o-;:[%cis•s:s;:E::n:a::: --t. :=: l=i:YSzq-;:i:9 : [:i: ;E:i•. , "a•f : -:•If : .•.1 .... i.. !': ' [ !]:r:.• f I:ro-.:::5;.:nr"i •:•J•:•: .. I •.E : •: z... z s :r'n••I` t '`?IE1f: {.,. ' •'IS YS].•.:. ::_... r . , i,=:': '•''s: .:5.1 •='t'' •_ = 21 'S St: .a 1 �. s °s;?.:5;:•..}.:,, E [==et•,a; ii;•i•E:; :: },. : ii'� _ 4 ..:::[:: h e 'z:l :: i =3:i 1 ;:n::::•_ •,::r=•.:;nr. j=1•:e! 4,:4:j:rj:ii=;:i:E:j � }jv=l:;:iii: :jt;:r: _ . ,f: . s . E . :r: . :L•.• • :•1=.. = s .e,t 1 :•! . :',7 S f:S•=. :: lSj:: ::S=C:•::: r:: 'iE iejiEE • -.•t Griii • ' .. 1 K•€ t :::. E . =1 3 1,,,,;.i::.: , . _ - . 1 :ff=iE;i:t...:.:.......:7.t,f.i_ :. J . t! S..S.z•.;; ' .:,;J:.It.. ,I f.f.. ,i . = j ::=:�ir•Ij:i.-.:...:f.._..., r" ti=:: .:__. t.=•€•i•: s . •€ . .! ,3..,71 t ttj3- .,_ . _ . �. ..s . ._,: 1:a :_.:_ :: tfs:4Y:...... . ;,:, ,.....c..... s..::::• , • sM1•, : t ,..1.. _ ,.,... ,. } t::;•r:'a,; l . .€• ..€:::.:..::::. .::.: . . Sttrearn or Lake Study, Standard .•,c•;•;,:.:•: • " _•: = i.i. , ;,1.•:;=::e'::•t;::I;i;: ;i• Y,:,::::::t< ' ':"_:•� ::S• : ==:a:;:•::•7I�i' %�y, }� ,,'i°' 1 it '�`��,1r �u(��.i.�3S� � '� : yl;r:l il:'; '_' n: y:•Z'':S °::, i i •:•::• ::,:::.':=:�::. ,.I.. e:;:=j:.-,• 1.. .;.7.;:, :::_ i;;i%:K.o-,• tt:•.;;,,e.:, ;t7:n•:;:: i:;: : �:; :. - :jtj:i .i:le°`°'!:eiE;:j iE';;;E;3E:ii;E= ; L:]= ':! _:_..... :-:_ •. :3:1:::'31:13 S . .i.'::,.! :.:.: 1.:5::•'.....J•.•:•: L: •::: _:: S:; 1: i:r • 1... � l E'e •z•z•tK•,•.•. ., } � ..3 .o-.. �s�� [,1.� t;�,_,C ` +�L�ji�}i�y 1.�}��,{��y7fepyl �i •7:.:.: •.:3'€3.: pY [S�:•:•1•:•:p T:•• :•_•:. ,f:y:�2}1•le••'.:�1� ,?}; L??J42}I;,:fS���f� ..E:: .,.,€ ii,: 1 . . f)r :., E?t.; .L f�. .. t,..= •. :5•:... S,t.E.:L . .;.. 1 •:a::: la:;:i;i .L.2 :::_:::::... , ..,;.,. , .iii�E;:::•.. ...rf. E3=., -.J, . ::: •s y;;. . s . ..E..:.:.:.:•:. ,ri:i ::�?:'c E3if=:� E%:::::::::Si:� :: _ .. 1 ...,., .. Stream or Lake Mitlgation Pian 4 s,r•:-:nn••� �::•:J: .J :.:: .• , ••.lda• : :.nnt=:;;a:r; 7,L4 :• { .,:::.;.;...;.; •.........1 7;J?ki.. .f.1:}:'z::fY : ::e1=€� ,.,Ji.,. ;.q..:. .1•;.i .:i:=.,.; . i. } .,.3•E{e � �•�yyy� 1��, • _!:- [: �:: �::':::.,_ s•:•. -3y... ...7...,auas:,,...:.: I`.,.ti,�?,fi :.[.2 •€il'c'� : i.:. ..: [{3�Iir .• ..7: =i:;::E •t:..Y•.hl: • -:..} .;. !•.•: .: 2 is -•-r :- 1 •. s..i:;:j:•:;:;:i.:a ..!._ :.1... 11€3€fE3f"ef}rl;:.;_.. 1 .;1... _ -t. ,.,. •::t•.,,•:: :::r:::=::1:1,:::•:3::'+.L:::•::::::i:3:::E:;a:E:;:r ::j:3:=:j:}tii:iSi :%i %.. :• iijil=3[i=l E€E=E,.,.,:.,•,•••,•, o-a]::�;:::•:•nL...t .•: . t•r.•:.• .............::.....t?:=: '• =?1 • ..ti...=.. .l.i.::.[p=i:e: E:i=i'i !.•. ::IS.•. .;q.. :;€;�=:•..S:t .,;., :.I:[;5:.::IS•,. •T i..., .,r i IE: ::3�•,..•J::,:.7...:..; .: ! ?; :=:as= FlF .: . : ie=:,:{::.y ...l:;i.;l!;e;Ei:•: •:•l•1•:• :.[a•;•:•:•. .:� i.. E :. ?-.._-.-: E -E•: •.K.,•:n•.•i::•.•l•. :Eli:=:: :ar.•.L.-:. Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 =i:i:�:i:; _ .=:iE%%.. 1�,[3��]�17�Lt 1h�'ey3 i :•3.3 -t=l"=:..:..::'::::i ' 'f:...f :•q : -:_ s f ] _ .•1• j ::a••; :•t:::=:..: ::z:a:::::.:: ::::. ::5 :c:i :i:;=E;:•:e:4:;:::a ee:;::. : •:•1=••J f Y_ 3 :: :.�...-;sd;:: :}ri3i;,•:.•,••: • ;:i:.. IR': -T ST.'ry.'�Sti:..: :''• E'.ii=:' i•...•: :=7=_:;•.v •: :...... , L.;::;j::. r. . 1.... .s. ..r•o-• , f . . ..•s•;::=1=:=. . , . . z .....:..::::....•.• _{..,_;:.,:::;:j:j:??;:;:;:;:i:; . . . Traffic SiudY 2 •: 5,:.. - - •::1::.::. 2::.:: 7 .==i:�y9•:'t:.r::":;E_}:='•'0=c:: ':3:::;:Ee:i3=f`y; :;z i°i=:••.••i - -€'. •a ••sls::•7: •.I.I:::i:i'.: pp [i� L�r.� per � '3 ;;S[:}:;:;i y<3:::.s.:.:. '=iai'"jfi ;i€i€<3fli .:Ei=u•.. :.ii']r: � :l:::i:ia::'S l -i .:=:::r . S :: _ 1 , e.;:='_�:::= ..,.:•i.:i::: : i-..- -[E� :lief-iE3 E: •: ;•: _:•.:- . i'7S ::.. .7.;:;::: .,-,tiq :::: `::...: ..2... s: �-:..,.,.:�:..•... . snisl:a::=•::::. :•J•:•:.•:.:.. ':ixa:•:J:•:?:;:;>:;:;•••!e•�•- t" . l `t=• � �' f 1•' ��I;ISl;�I,Y,fsl�r� . ��il.:•i.: 7.• :z�:..:.1. �::.� . ...1.+•--,•-�`}°:•.• :?%:=iiE:c;f:-,. Gia:: s:�;•;,:•: ,: , .!E'E .. _ . is E:' ::_. .r..•:.K. . s;:E 3EE...,.i;l.. : s.. tr=i=:€.''3;eif1.3:...::.:• •.• ...t..,. .,.,•,. f.•.:i•.: ::=s . _ 7.; _ . ,-s,J;^::i:;:::E3i[ :.:., ;:.•., 3.€:Ei=E 3•:.:. ::l:i.......r.....•.•.-. _ . ;>li Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 '=i:}:: - :i:; :=; . %' t l"= . 3 :::.E 1.:::;%:=i :..;iji:._ . '���ij� p dot cc((!! �}y•f�Y•'l 2y sit:•":•� : •i.��IK�� til . ..4.z... 1. II,,ll ' 3ti€�• •:• •S:, . I :. •.- .7:E iEiE::• . 1 :.:h.:K+• •t.. t . :=7 :3_ . :{i:.%. ji;3;E:••: i;ii=fiiic;.r. 1 1.. -!•:::L:•;:n:•:•:•:•;7•:•;:: 1 ..Sl.:%::: N:•1 �jyEj�., ��� . �J:r' _.. :till. .:•t•: •• i:1.:- _:••. �7:.: .;i,•f:l:.; :.;.;: r;.;.,. .: i.::�� 1-.•r='- .::]::j::::i:y:l:'.;" .K. l;.� .:i1=:•:.: .J. : •T'= : _i:l:l=:=eii=' ✓µ,i ! ] ,t;•.•. ::l:E_. 1kE: : 1.;.;.ni' :::: ;,:5;:+.i:i1;E:E;Ei - , . . ..E -s:.::.; ;.;... : :µ.i•1 . Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final 4 .:v.:.1.: .J.: �.•.•.: '• : ,'a:::ac::;:;: -- ::ray: ', f. _-.• • :aj: •: _:' 7 i= : !�' C i>-:i$>D:.!1 �Saf . ,.`. .,:I •. .S E =E=lee•:.: :3• j: '.j._.t.:{.:a!=:: 7��lSl[i`RF:9S'I . A5L}� Si;:•tY.`,r[F:x��.�� : 7j .�:Eia...r S�7=;i: <r:. 1GL: �.:{.Al•.•:•}.!:. � ...•.•....,.,i T;,�E;E;: i•.•.. •.1. • •1•: •. :._•_•_• t.4.., =:i: � >• : " Y•7•.•.• : :el%i=:;i:= E€ .. _. :' :1;•:%e }L. w..tK :• ..= E E.•,•:. : € . e -=:i:3.,... s...... ''tt =.! z.:.s:z:::s 1.. :•:ii .: :: s';:=:=7=::: = fE=i=... :1... i::::::� ::::::i: r.: :ai[[i;[ a:: :=`::::::'• : a•c ?.;1! i'i'; =: :j:�:'• =-;1::7 .:.i:E:iil,J•13 }ji}3:Eili3if33eiiiiii= �;^ . , c ilii+. :•. l{ tii.i;.y; :;:1 1•:.:7Jr.:•:::f:- ::7• :: K:': 1::= ;.! o- :aei%;!.. 1L' -=o -t i=3E=3===e= fif '::...1..j::•:[n;3:=:=;:.•.. .=1= � � fi%i;,y::ZK:.. •.iPS.,. �: if �:.:.i•:•.•-::: Wetlands Report/Delineatlon 4 . •:na :,'y,.;:: iiiii J3.}:s::::.::: J 1 f:jz'. 1 . . s•:ii3 ::33:3;3 E;E;E;:i;E;'r:i; .t•: Ea•:.::,• ., i.:: :•ra:.••:,-••::.:•::.•:•:. > .= t. ' . ,.. � : l:. sl ss:^t. s : r :7::,•; `f '.;y:;:;r::i%::: E 1 ::•s .1=.::Sr• s ::;te::::::: ::=:5.:�;I::•::TL:S::I=:=:::::_:%_':_:::::= :::j:;:;!]::::: j.:j] :13=,.:14 .fey:...: •. k Ef}iE:•:.:.: % :.r•;•;:i%E = e<=E:E G;•:•:1: S731E: E33:et t sj€Ei3€eieii;jie': . ..n...,.•:.: ...::........... i . .•r,:Y:•::ni::::a4.Y17i• ..r -,_ .. ...Z.1.: :;;: ..1.. . 1S: •,•1•,•I ,: El E=:a : .•.1.11-1::: :: f=}=rLx:n1::4:2j1.r• . •s:aa.n •:E:•r •: f=_ .. 1 . ,:,i.; ,.;... fji€=:Kasrzl: .S..: 1._. pa . .:.1 . ..!... o-r•;.e... ,.;.:. ;:;3. .,1,.; .S:y}e E:}•$%:;::; :v, •: er}E:==:::4 ].:_ .14:]•:•c:.. ]is ;ci Applicant Agreement Statement 2ANp3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2mc, 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 21 NDN Map of Existind Site Conditions 2 AM 3 Map of View Area 2AND -3 Photosimulations 2ANi]3 This requirement may be waived by: I . Property Services . 2. Public Workp Plan Review 3. Building 'd. Planning PROJECTNAME: pnl*ar�-�o r'-r;i3rZAq'zyl DATE,�- H:lCE Ettaw-wm-Tempww%salWelp Handouts+Mannln&Av] eEafstWdairagsMs DIM City of Renton ptannin9 Division NEAR $1 -01 RE , OV ED PROJECT NARRATIVE I"tor[ ::�s1OWA March 2012 PIN COUNTY! LIBRARY; Owner., King County Library System Contact: Greg Smith Facilities Management Services 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, 98027 425.369.3237 Architect. The Miller hull Partnership, LLP Contact: Maaike Post 71 Columbia — Sixth Floor Seattle, WA 98104-1031 206.682.6837 Project Narrative Renton Library Project Name: Renton Library Project location: 510 South 3`d Street Renton, WA 98055 Size: 15,083 SF (GROSS) Land Use Permits required for proposed project: Conditional Use Permit (hearing examiner) Site Plan Review Environmental Review Waiver/Modification of Code Requirements: Parking Modification Right of Way Use Permit Zoning designation: CD - Center Downtown Current use of the site: At the west end of the project site there is an existing commercial building. Formerly a BigS store, it is now vacant. Towards the middle of the project site there is currently surface parking for the commercial building. At the east end of the project site is a public park 'Gateway Park'. Special site features: There are no special site features such as wetlands, or steep slopes. The project site is generally flat. No surface water body exists on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. The Cedar River flows near the site, approximately'/ mile to the north east. Soil type and drainage conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site generally consist of interbedded layers of soft to medium stiff silts and clays, and loose sand with variable amounts of silt, underlain by dense sands and gravels with variable amounts of silt and occasional cobbles. Proposed use of property: The proposed project consists of building a new library building (15,083 GSF) with associated site improvements including the renovation of Gateway Park. SITE: Street trees and planting areas are proposed consistent with the development standards in the City of Renton Municipal Code. Gateway park has been re -designed, in consultation with Renton Parks Department and with input from the public, in order to create a plaza that will function as the entry plaza for the new library. Security being one of the main concerns with the existing park, the new plaza design is open and urban. It contains seating, trees and landscaping in planters, paving that ties in with adjacent paving, sculptural furnishings, and opportunities for the community to hold events (such as a farmer's market or a concert). Access: Project Narrative Renton Library BUILDING: The existing commercial structure will be removed_ (A separate demolition permit will be submitted) King County Library System (KCLS) is proposing the construction of a one-story, ±15,000 SF library at 510S.3 rd Street in downtown Renton. The pedestrian entrance to the library would be located at the Northeast corner of the building with the entrance facing East. Pedestrians would approach the entry via the redesigned plaza described above. A book drop is proposed near the building entrance and is accessible by pedestrians. (Refer Level 1 floor plan). The proposed construction type is Type V. TRANSPORTATION The project site is bordered on the North by the City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline easement with (42) stalls of head -in street parking. The site is bordered on the East by Logan Avenue S., with the 'Renton Piazza' on the other side of Lagan. Logan Avenue S. is classified as a minor arterial. The site is bordered on the South by S. 3rd Street, a principal arterial. It is a one-way street heading East with two lanes of traffic and parallel parking on both sides. To the West of the site is a zero lot -line commercial property. In the vicinity of the project site are: Renton Pavilion Event Center, Renton Transit Center, and the Park & Ride Garage. Table 1. Existing Roadway Designations iI:T1►F11fi■1_1IW1II141 CA The Renton Transit Center is within a block of the project site. It consists of ten boarding locations located between Logan Avenue South, Burnett Avenue South, South 2nd Street, and South 3'd Street. Approximately twenty-two METRO or Sound Transit routes are served providing transit connections to locations such as the Sea -Tac, Rainier Beach, Seattle, Kent, Bellevue, Black Diamond, Fairwood, Renton Highlands, Kennydale, Shoreline, and Burien. Proposed off-site improvements: Existing parking in the ROW to the North of the site will not be affected. The project proposes adding (6) additional parking stalls in the ROW to the North, two of which are ADA stalls. In addition, (2) parking spots are proposed, by re -striping the parallel street parking on S. d 3r Cross Speed Sidewalks Roadway Name Classification Section Limit On -Street Parking South 3rd St. Principal 2 lanes 25 mph Approx. 8'-0" Yes, both sides Arterial Logan Avenue Minor 2 lanes 25 mph Yes, west side only South Arterial Public ROW, SPU none 2 lanes 25 mph Approx. S' -O" Yes, head -in easement parking both sides iI:T1►F11fi■1_1IW1II141 CA The Renton Transit Center is within a block of the project site. It consists of ten boarding locations located between Logan Avenue South, Burnett Avenue South, South 2nd Street, and South 3'd Street. Approximately twenty-two METRO or Sound Transit routes are served providing transit connections to locations such as the Sea -Tac, Rainier Beach, Seattle, Kent, Bellevue, Black Diamond, Fairwood, Renton Highlands, Kennydale, Shoreline, and Burien. Proposed off-site improvements: Existing parking in the ROW to the North of the site will not be affected. The project proposes adding (6) additional parking stalls in the ROW to the North, two of which are ADA stalls. In addition, (2) parking spots are proposed, by re -striping the parallel street parking on S. d 3r Project Narrative Renton Library A new fire hydrant is required and is proposed near the corner of S. 3rd and Logan Ave_ S_ Public sidewalks adjacent to the project will be widened and re -paved. At the ROW to the north, planting strips have been eliminated resulting in a walk approximately 10'-0" wide. At S. 3rd St., the proposed building has been set back from the property line approximately 1'-6" resulting in a walk approximately 12'-0" wide, aligned with the existing sidewalk along S. 3rd St. at Gateway Park and the Piazza to the East. The project proposes a total of 2,516 SF of landscaping, including (13) new trees. Total estimated construction cost / estimated fair market value of proposed project: $9 million Fill/excavation: Estimated earthwork quantities: Cut: 1,320 cubic yards (Native Soils) Fill: 1,030 cubic yards (Imported Structural Fill) For the new library, excavation will occur to accommodate a depressed slab for the proposed access floor plenum. In addition, geothermal bore holes will be drilled underneath the proposed building, producing drilling spoils that will be hauled off site. No substantial fill occurring on site. Material will be imported from WSDOT approved pits as needed to fill void areas of removed footings from the existing building demolition. Number, type, and size of any trees to be removed: All existing vegetation will be removed as follows: (5) Cornus'Eddies' White Wonder', 3"-4" caliper (3) Zelkova serrata, 4" caliper (11) Zelkova serrata, 6" — 8" caliper (1) 8" caliper deciduous tree (8) multi -stem deciduous trees, 2" -4" caliper Proposed modifications requested: Parking Modification Right of Way Use Permit P:\Renton Library%Documents\04_Agencies\02 Land use & berno Applications\12-0327 SUBMITTAL\CU + SA+ ELF\06 -project narratwe.docx CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT JUSTIFICATION RENTON LIBRARY March 2012 City of Renton Planning Division MAR 2 7 2012 IREE" " E. _ COUNTY LIBR1IRY Owner: King County Library System Contact: Greg Smith Facilities Management Services 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, 98027 425.369.3237 Architect: The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP Contact: Maaike Post 71 Columbia — Sixth Floor Seattle, WA 98104-1031 206.682.6837 Conditional Use Permit Justification Renton Library Project Name: Renton Library Project location! 510 South 3rd Street Renton, WA 98055 Size: 15,083 SF (GROSS) Zoning designation: CD - Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation: UCD — Urban Center Downtown A- Comprehensive Plan: The City of Renton planning goals encourage renewed attention to the 'urban center' in order to promote urban living and counteract urban sprawl. The idea is to concentrate people and services and make them accessible by transit. Within that urban center, Renton has decided to concentrate on the downtown core and has made considerable progress. This is evidenced by the redevelopment of the piazza area, with the transit center and the adjacent parking garage. The proposed project is located immediately west of this piazza. It consists of building a new library building (approx. 15,000 GSF) with associated site improvements including the renovation of Gateway Park. The cultural function of a library will be another catalyst, enriching the experience of Renton's downtown core. B. Community Need: The proposed location does not result in the over -concentration of libraries within the city: The proposed project is the new location for the Renton Public Library which is currently housed in a unique 1966 building that spans the Cedar River between Bronson Way South and Houser Way South. The proposed library location is about a half mile southwest of the existing location. The proposed library will continue to be the main public library for downtown Renton. The other King County Library System branches that serve Renton residents are located in more residential areas: Highlands Library and Skyway Library. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use: The proposed library location on South 3rd street is much more urban and central to the downtown core than the current library location. The project site is immediately west of a vibrant public park. The piazza draws people into the downtown core with the weekly farmers market and its adjacency to the Pavilion Event Center. This area is extremely accessible with public transit, as the Renton transit center is immediately north of the Pavilion Event Center. In addition, parking is plentiful, both on -street and in the City Center Parking Garage located north of the transit center. The addition of a cultural facility to this area will draw yet another subset of Renton residents to the downtown core. It adds another destination for people to visit. Conditional Use Permit Justification Renton Library C. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location does not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property: The proposed project will actually be beneficial to adjacent properties. The library will draw patrons from all over the city. The increased pedestrian traffic will contribute to the social nature of the proposed plaza and the existing piazza. Compatibility: Parking: Traffic: The proposed project is compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood. Most of the buildings near the project site are typical downtown one- or two-story structures, with storefront glazing facing South 3`d street. Attention was paid by the design team to make the proposed one- story library fit into the context of this downtown street. The south fagade, facing South3`d street has a large amount of glazing, putting the library function on display towards this main thoroughfare of Renton. The fagade is brought down in scale by the addition of canopies at regular intervals along its length. Modulation and interest is provided by an arcade, built from cast -in-place concrete, which frames each bay of glazing. The full civic scale of this proposed cultural institution is more prominently visible from the proposed plaza east of the building, and also from the Renton piazza east of that plaza. The north portion of the proposed library houses the service functions and is more subdued in expression. The cladding material will be terra cotta tiles varied with terra cotta screens. The layers of building skin will reveal openings for windows, small niches with planting (and building egress), and book drops. The Utility Right of Way to the north of the project site currently contains (42) stalls. Those will be maintained in the proposed project. In addition, (6) stalls will be added (two of which are AOA accessible) as part of the proposed plaza improvements. Finally, by re -striping the parallel street parking on S. 3`d St., an additional (2) parking stalls are proposed. In addition, there is the City Center Parking Garage located a block away from the project site, with (562) parking spots. The vehicle traffic patterns around the project site will not be significantly affected by the proposed project. The drive aisle width and direction of traffic flow at the utility right-of-way will not been affected by the proposed project, Some of the parking will be designated short-term for library drop- off, however this is not anticipated to affect traffic. Pedestrian circulation has been taken into account in the redesign of Gateway Park. The proposal aims to improve sight lines into the park by removing the existing dense tree canopy and the landscaped mound in the center, thus improving safety. The proposed plaza has an urban character with more paving than the existing park, as it will function as the entry plaza to the new library. New crosswalk striping is proposed in two locations to aid pedestrian traffic between the plaza and the mixed-use building to the north. Noise, Glare: Although noise impacts are not anticipated and the project is not required to implement noise mitigation, the proposed library is planned to be constructed with sound insulation or other means to achieve a day/night average interior noise level of 45 Ldn. Conditional Use Permit Justification (Renton Library The library's general hours of operation are anticipated to be as follows: Monday — Thursday 10am — 9pm Friday 10am — 5pm Saturday 10am —5pm Sunday fpm —5pm Additionally, a range of vehicles will make deliveries to the library. The refuse/recycling enclosure has been located at the northwest corner of the project site, as far from the bulk of pedestrian traffic as possible. Noise impacts to neighboring uses are not anticipated as a result of the library and associated activities. The lighting for this project will be low glare and comfortable. The proposal includes the addition of three new streetlights, per city standard. Four existing pedestrian -height streetlights will be replaced with the city standard. Finally, as part of the project, the existing streetlight at the southwest corner of the project site will be removed. Downlights with excellent shielding and cutoff will be incorporated into canopies. Lighting will occurfrom dawn to dusk. Some non-critical lights may be controlled to turn off after hours or in the later evening hours to further reduce light impact. Landscaping: Gateway park has been re -designed, in consultation with Renton Parks Department and with input from the public, in order to create a plaza that will function as the entry plaza for the new library. Security being one of the main concerns with the existing park, the new plaza design is open and urban. It contains seating, trees and landscaping in planters, paving that ties in with adjacent paving, sculptural furnishings, and opportunities for the community to hold events (such as a farmer's market or a concert). Street trees and planting areas are proposed consistent with the development standards in the City of Renton Municipal Code. The project proposes a total of 2,515 SF of landscaping, including (13) new trees. Accessory Uses: N/A Conversion: N/A Public Improvements: The proposed project is adequately served by, and does not impose any burden on the surrounding public improvements. Lot Coverage: Yards: Height: The proposed project is in the CD zone, therefore has no maximum building requirements. The proposed project is in the CD zone. The front yard setback is 0'-0" minimum and 15'-0" maximum_ The proposed project is in the CD zone. The maximum building height is 50'-0". P:\Renton Library\Documents\04_Agencies\02 Land Use & Demo Applications\12.0327 SUElMITTAL\CU+ SA+ ECF\07 -conditional use permit justification.docx LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS, LOT COVERAGE, PARKING ANALYSIS RENTON LIBRARY March 2012 K' N G COUNTY LIBRARY Owner: King County Library System Contact: Greg Smith Facilities Management Services 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, 95027 425.369.3237 Architect: The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP Contact: Maaike Post 71 Columbia — Sixth Floor Seattle, WA 98104-1031 206.682.6837 C�N00 e 101 t� Landscape Analysis, Lot Coverage, Parking Analysis Renton Library Project Name.- Renton ame:Renton Library Project location: 510 South 3`d Street Renton, WA 98055 Sloe: 15,083 SF (GROSS) Zoning designation: CD - Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation: UCD — Urban Center Downtown Total Square Footage of site: 24,315 SF Square Footage of library parcel: 16,622 SF Footprint of proposed Library: 15,083 SF Total square footage of existing impervious surface area (within the property lines of the two parcels combined): 20,560 SF (0.472 acres) Total square footage of proposed impervious surface area (within the property lines of the two parcels combined): 22,73$ SF (0.522 acres) Percentage of lot covered by buildings: The proposed library covers 91% of its parcel. The proposed library covers 62% of the two parcels combined. Number of parking spaces required by City code: 603 (please refer parking modification request) Number and dimensions of standard, compact and ADA accessible spaces provided: (please refer 1-1.00, C-300, and parking modification request) (42) existing parking stalls in the utility right of way (6) proposed parking stalls in the utility right of way (including 2 ADA accessible spaces) (5) proposed parallel parking stalls by re -striping at S. 3rd St. P:%Renton Library\Documents\04_Agencies\02 Land Use & Demo Applicatians\12-0327 SUBMRTAL\CU a SA, + ECF\27 landscape analysis etc.docx CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION RENTON LIBRARY March 2012 K I N G COElNYY LIBRARY Owner. King County Library System Contact: Greg Smith Facilities Management Services 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, 98027 425.369.3237 Architect. The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP Contact: Maaike Post 71 Columbia —Sixth Floor Seattle, WA 98104-1031 206.682.6837 C+ty of Renton ,,,,rang w 97 01 'CF Construction Mitigation Description Renton Library Project Name: Renton Library Project location: 510 South 3rd Street Renton, WA 98055 Size: 15,083 SF (GROSS) Zoning designation: CD - Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation: UCD — Urban Center Downtown Proposed Construction Dates: Construction is projected to start in November of 2012. Hours & days of operation: The hours of construction activity are anticipated to be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 P.M. on weekdays. Proposed hauling/transportation routes To be determined. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics: During construction of the proposed project, some particulate emissions, such as fugitive dust, may occur because of truck and heavy machinery traffic. Fugitive dust would be controlled by water sprinkling, resulting in minimal and localized impacts. Construction equipment would produce gaseous and particulate emissions- However, emissions would be temporary, lasting only for the duration of construction Because the site is generally flat, significant impacts from erosion are not expected with site development or the proposed library use. Even so, proposed construction -related erosion control measures include best management practices (BMPs) such as filter fabric fence, inlet protection, sediment trap, construction entranceway, and temporary seeding to control sediment and erosion on site. Standard erosion control practices will be followed during all phases of construction. These methods would reduce or eliminate deposition of sediment from the construction site. No special permanent erosion control measures are proposed in association with the library because no erosion impacts are anticipated. Special hours proposed for construction or hauling: To be determined. Preliminary traffic control plan: To be determined. PARenton Library\Documents\04_Agencies\02 land We & Demo Applications\12-0327 SUBMITTAL\CU+ SA+ ECF\09 - construction mitigation descriptlon.docx APPLICATION FOR RIGHT OF WAY USE RENTON LIBRARY March 2012 K I N G COUNTY LIBRARY Owner: King County Library System Contact: Greg Smith Facilities Management Services 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, 98027 425.369.3237 Architect: The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP Contact: Maaike Post 71 Columbia — Sixth Floor Seattle, WA 98104-1031 206.682.6837 City of Renton Planning Division MAR ?. 7 2411 nygCOV ED All Application for Right of Way Use Renton Library Project Name: Renton Library Project location: 510 South 3rd Street Renton, WA 98055 Size: 15,083 SF (GROSS) Applicable City Code and Sub-ordinance.- 9-2-1 ub-ordinance:9-2-1 through 9-2-7 9-17-8 Items and quantities involved: This request is for six roof canopies along South 3rd street. They are part of a library project proposed for downtown Renton east of the piazza. The proposed canopies project south from the building fagade and cross the property line 2'-6" into the public right of way. The width of each canopy is 18'-0". Justification for request: The canopies help provide shelter from sun and rain for any pedestrians below. The canopies will bring down the scale of the south fa4ade of the proposed project. The canopies will help shade the south -facing glazing of the proposed library. Amount of time requested: The use of the right of way is requested for the life of the building. Vicinity map: (attached) P:\Renton Library\Documents\04_Agencles\02 Land Use & Demo Applications\12-0327 SUBMITTAL\Right of Way Use Permit [canopies[\Ul - row use permit request Ietter.docx APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RENTON RIGHT OF WAY USE — DEFERRALS — WAIVERS — VARIANCES — FEE IN LIEU 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 PROJECT NAME: RENTON LIBRARY SITE ADDRESS: 510 SOUTH 3RD STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: LOTS 3 THROUGH 5 BLOCK 6, WITHER'S SIXTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON Include King County Assessors Parcel No: 784180-0195 & 784180-0205 APPLICANT: MILLER HULL; CONTACT MAAIKE POST PHONE: 206.682.6837 BUSINESS ADDRESS: CELL: 319.619.6223 71 COLUMBIA, 6TH FLOOR, SEATTLE, WA 98104 Zip Code ATTACH A SEPARATE LETTER WITH THIS APPLICATION STATING IN DETAIL: The request which includes: 1. Applicable City Code and Sub -ordinance 2. Items and quantities involved 3. Justification for request 4. Amount of time requested 5. Provide vicinity map (8-1/2 by I 1 inch sheet) Attach a drawing of your site (on 8.5x11 inch paper). Mail or drop off the completed application and neap to: CITY OF RENTON Development Services Division Rick Moreno, Coordinator 1055 — S. Grady Way 04 Floor Renton, WA 98057 425-430-7378 Completed applications will be reviewed and a written determination issued approximately 3-4 weeks from date of receipt of application. You will be contacted if application is incomplete or if additional information is required. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: DATE: OFFICE USE ONLY OFFICE USE ONLY OFFICE USE ONLY OFFICE USE ONLY DEFERRAL ( ) New ( ) Extension Offsite Onsite EXCESS R/W ( ) FEE IN LIEU ( ) WAIVER ( ) W,Tile 5ys%BPW - Board of Public WorksIAPPLICATION%BPW.doc VARIANCE ( ) New ( ) Extension ( ) Underground ( ) Driveway ( ) Slope Grades ( ) Noise X m z 0 z T SHATTUCK AVE. S. WHITWORTH AVE. S. MORRIS AVE. S, THER'S AVE. S. L _ LOGAN AVE. S. rig---� BURNETT AVE. S. WILLIAMS AVE. S. n -nFR z; 51�z c�z fnT- �,00 wo zit? iz �u o mCarn m -331m 0 ->u zz � z M cR o m WELLS AVE. S. ., 1 PARKING MODIFICATION RENTON LIBRARY March 2012 o1 e�! a 0% Gita ow VD 'KING u " COUNTY i LIBRARY Owner: King County Library System Contact: Greg Smith Facilities Management Services 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, 98027 425.369.3237 Architect: The Miller Hull Partnership, LLP Contact: Maaike Post 71 Columbia — Sixth Floor Seattle, WA 98104-1031 206.682.6837 City of Renton as annirig Divis on MAR 2 7 2012 rp Project Name: Renton Library Project location: 510 South 3`d Street Renton, WA 98055 Size: 15,083 SF (GROSS) Zoning designation: CD - Center Downtown Comprehensive Plan designation: UCD — Urban Center Downtown Request, Parking Modification Renton Library Per RMC 4 -4 -080 -F -10-e, a Cultural Facility is required to provide 4 stalls per 100 SF. The proposed library project would require 603 stalls. For several reasons, providing 603 parking stalls is impractical for the proposed library project. Per RMC 4-9-250 a modification to a code requirement can be requested when there are practical difficulties. In addition, per RMC 4-4-080-F-11 the city requires bicycle parking based on 10% of the required number of parking stalls. For the proposed library, the city requires 60 bicycle parking spots. Practical difficulties: The footprint of the proposed library covers almost all of its parcel (approx 90%) leaving no room for parking on the site. A parking garage underneath the building would be prohibitively expensive because of poor soil conditions and the water table which is approximately 12'-0" below grade. The project also proposes the redesign of Gateway park, east of the library building. This is currently a public park; the proposed renovation will improve safety and security while creating an entry plaza for the new library. Including vehicle parking on this parcel would be a disservice to the public space. The proposed redesign of the plaza includes parking for ten bicycles. Increasing the bicycle parking further would make it disproportionate to the relatively small plaza; it would start to impede on the openness of the public space. Proposed off-site improvements include adding (6) parking stalls in the utility right of way, directly north of the plaza property. This includes two ADA accessible stalls. In addition, by re -striping the parallel parking along S. 3`d Street, (2) additional parking stalls are proposed. Parking Modification Renton Library Parking opportunities in the vicinity: The project proposes adding six parking stalls the utility right of way, directly north of the plaza property. 42 There are (42) stalls currently located in the utility right of way north of the project site. These will not be affected by the proposed project. 137 There are 137 street parking spots available within a one -block radius of the project site. The project proposes re -striping the parallel parking along the south edge of the project site. Between Logan Ave. 5. and the Roxy Theater to add (2) parking stalls 562 City of Renton has constructed the City Center Parking Garage located a block away from the project site, with 562 parking spots. 749 total Transit Access to the project site: Impacts: The Renton Transit Center is within a block of the project site. It consists of ten boarding locations located between Logan Avenue South, Burnett Avenue South, South god Street, and South 3`d Street. Approximately twenty-two METRO or Sound Transit routes are served providing transit connections to locations such as the Sea -Tac, Rainier Beach, Seattle, Kent, Bellevue, Black Diamond, Fairwood, Renton Highlands, Kennydale, Shoreline, and Burien, There are no negative impacts anticipated to affect safety, function, appearance, the environment, or maintainability of surrounding properties as a result of granting this parking modification - Intent and purpose of governing land use designation of comprehensive plan is met: The comprehensive plan aims to foster the further development of a rich and vibrant downtown core. The proposed library project, a cultural facility will be a catalyst in that effort. Requiring this project to provide 602 parking stalls on the proposed project site is not feasible and would make this addition to the downtown core impossible. Given the amount of parking available in the immediate vicinity for future library patrons, and the ease of access via public transit, it would be beneficial to the goals of the comprehensive plan to grant a parking modification for this project. Modification is in conformity with the intent and purposes of municipal code: The Renton Municipal Code aims to create and foster a `quality community where people choose to live, work and play'. A new library will be an attractive amenity for the people of Renton across the entire demographic. Again, given the plentiful available parking in the vicinity of the proposed library, and the transit options, it would be beneficial to grant a parking modification for this project. P:\Renton Library\Documents\D4_Agencies\02 Land Use & Demo Applications\12-03275UBMIT7AL\Parking Modification\P0 - parking modification.docx cid P/ Yfof�"Onto D t7 PLANNING DIVISION nn �7 fz DESIGN DISTRICT "A " CHECKLIS § City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: Ensure compliance with design review regulations located in the Renton Municipal Code in order to: a. Maintain and protect property values; b. Enhance the general appearance of the City; c. Encourage creativity in building and site design; d. Achieve predictability, balanced with flexibility; and e. Consider the individual merits of proposals. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This design district checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City will use this checklist to determine whether the proposal complies with the Urban Design Regulations in the Renton Municipal Code (RMC 4-3-100). There are two categories that have been established: (a) "minimum standards' that must be met, and (b) "guidelines" that, while not mandatory, are considered by the Planning Director in determining if the proposed action meets the intent of the design guidelines if the standard cannot be met. Please describe how your proposal meets each standard. If you are not able to meet the standard, please describe how the proposal meets the intent and guidelines of the applicable section. If a question does not apply to your proposal, write "does not apply". Complete answers may avoid unnecessary delays in the processing of your review. environment. Lots shall be configured to encourage variety and so that natural light is available to buildings and open space. The privacy of individuals in residential uses shall be provided for. Standard: The availability of natural light (both direct and reflected) and direct sun exposure to nearby buildings and open space (except parking areas) shall be considered when siting structures. This project is designed in compliance with the Height Limit, and has ample glazing to capture natural daylight. Standard: Buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. The building is oriented to the street and easement with minimal setback from property lines. A prominent entry and large canopy provides cover for pedestrians approaching from all directions. Standard: The front entry of a building shall be oriented to the street or a landscaped pedestrian -only courtyard. The front entry faces the redesigned east plaza (pedestrian -only) and allows for entry from all three sides: the SPU parking easement at the north, transit connections to the east, and the south sidewalk along South 3rd Street. Canopies along 3rd and the plaza will encourage pedestrian access as well. Standard: Buildings with residential uses located at the street level shall be set back from the sidewalk a minimum of ten feet (10') and feature substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and the building or Have the ground floor residential uses raised above street level for residents' privacy. The building does not incorporate any residential uses. Guidelines: Primary entries shall face the street, serve as a focal point, and,allow space for social interaction. All entries shall include features that make them easily identifiable while reflecting the architectural character of the building. The primary entry shall be the most visually prominent entry. Pedestrian access to the building from the sidewalk, parking lots, and/or other areas shall be provided and shall enhance the overall quality of the pedestrian experience on the site. Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing a street, shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human - scale elements. The primary entrance faces Logan Avenue South and the redesigned plaza. A prominent entry is visible from the north parking area as well as the South 3rd Street sidewalk—and a large canopy provides cover for pedestrians approaching from all three directions. Standard: A primary entrance of each building shall be made visibly prominent by incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or ornamental lighting. A large facade overhang, large entry doors, and canopy lighting are provided on the East entry facade of the building_ Standard Building entries from a street shall be clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping and include weather protection at least four and one-half feet (4- 1/2') wide (illustration below). Buildings that are taller than thirty feet (30') in height shall also ensure that the weather protection is proportional to the distance above ground level. A large fa§ade overhang, large entry doors, and canopy lighting are provided on the East entry facade of the building. The overhang is more than 24' wide to ensure greater visibility and coverage. Standard: Building entries from a parking lot shall be subordinate to those related to the street. The building does not incorporate a public entry from the parking lot_ The north fagade does include a delivery entrance as well as an emergency egress door. Standard: Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows shall be oriented to a street or pedestrian -oriented space; otherwise, screening or decorative features should be incorporated. The main entry faces the pedestrian -only plaza, and large display windows are included along both 3`d Street and the plaza facades. Standard: Multiple buildings on the same site shall direct views to building entries by providing a continuous network of pedestrian paths and open spaces that incorporate landscaping. There is only one building being proposed for this site Standard: Ground floor residential units that are directly accessible from the street shall include entries from front yards to provide transition space from the street or entries from an open space such as a courtyard or garden that is accessible from the street. i e are no residential units being provided as part of this project. Guidelines: Careful siting and design treatment shall be used to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. Standard: At least one of the following design elements shall be used to promote a transition to surrounding uses: 1) Building proportions, including step -backs on upper levels in accordance with the surrounding planned and existing land use forms; or 2) Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller increments; or 3) Roof lines, roof pitches, and roof shapes designed to reduce apparent bulk and transition with existing development. Additionally, the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require increased setbacks at the side or rear of a building in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and/or so that sunlight reaches adjacent and/or abutting yards. The project includes several of the mentioned design elements: • Canopies and concrete forms break down the facade along 3rd Street into smaller -scale increments. • The building incorporates two roof forms to reduce the apparent bulk of the facility. • The building steps back from 3'd Street to provide clerestory light and to reduce the apparent mass of the building along that facade. Guidelines: Service elements shall be concentrated and located so that impacts to pedestrians and other abutting uses are minimized. The impacts of service elements shall be mitigated with landscaping and an enclosure with fencing that is made of quality materials. Standard: Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the impacts on the pedestrian environment and adjacent and/or abutting uses. Service elements shall be concentrated and located where they are accessible to service vehicles and convenient for tenant use. All mechanical units will be screened by the roof parapet, and trash facilities are concealed within a screened enclosure that matches the materiality of the building. Trash facilities will be accessible directly from the parking easement. Standard: In addition to standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling collection, and utility areas shall be enclosed on all sides, including the roof and screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence and have self-closing doors. All mechanical units will be screened by the roof parapet, and trash facilities are concealed within a screened enclosure that matches the materiality of the building. Trash facilities will be accessible directly from the parking easement. Standard: Service enclosures shall be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood, or some combination of the three (3). The service enclosure for the trash elements will be screened by terra cotta masonry panels, similar to the building. Standard: If the service area is adjacent to a street, pathway, or pedestrian -oriented space, a landscaped planting strip, minimum three feet (3') wide, shall be located on three (3) sides of such facility. Landscaping and screening are being utilized to conceal the service area from view along the parking easement. Guidelines: Surface parking shall be located and designed so as to reduce the visual impact of the parking area and associated vehicles. Large areas of surface parking shall also be designed to accommodate future infill development. Standard: Parking shall be located so that no surface parking is located between a building and the front property line, or the building and side property line, on the street side of a corner lot. Parking is not being located between the street and the front property line. Standard: Parking shall be located so that it is screened from surrounding streets by buildings, landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location. We are re -using the existing parking stalls that are located within the SPU easement and along 3'd Street. Guidelines: Parking garages shall not dominate the streetscape; they shall be designed to be complementary with adjacent and abutting buildings. They shall be sited to complement, not subordinate, pedestrian entries. Similar forms, materials, and/or details to the primary building(s) should be used to enhance garages. Standard: Parking structures shall provide space for ground floor commercial uses along street frontages at a minimum of seventy five percent (75%) of the building frontage width. This project does not include a parking structure. Standard: The entire facade must feature a pedestrian -oriented facade. The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development may approve parking structures that do not feature a pedestrian orientation in limited circumstances. If allowed, the structure shall be set back at least six feet (b') from the sidewalk and feature substantial landscaping. This landscaping shall include a combination of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, and ground cover. This setback shall be increased to ten feet (10') when abutting a primary arterial and/or minor arterial. NA Standard: Public facing facades shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other architectural elements and/or materials. NA Standard: The entry to the parking garage shall be located away from the primary street, to either the side or rear of the building. NA Standard: Parking garages at grade shall include screening or be enclosed from view with treatment such as walls, decorative grilles, trellis with landscaping, or a combination of treatments. NA Standard: The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may allow a reduced setback where the applicant can successfully demonstrate that the landscaped area and/or other design treatment meets the intent of these standards and guidelines. Possible treatments to reduce the setback include landscaping components plus one or more of the following integrated with the architectural design of the building: 1) Ornamental grillwork (other than vertical bars); 2) Decorative artwork; 3) Display windows; 4) Brick, tile, or stone; 5) Pre -cast decorative panels; 5) Vine -covered trellis; 7) Raised landscaping beds with decorative materials; or S) Other treatments that meet the intent of this standard. NA Guidelines: Vehicular access to parking garages and parking lots shall not impede or interrupt pedestrian mobility. The impacts of curb cuts to pedestrian access on sidewalks shall be minimized. Standard: Access to parking lots and garages shall be from alleys, when available. If not available, access shall occur at side streets. Access to parking stalls is being provided on the SPU easement and connects to the side streets Morris and Logan_ Standard: The number of driveways and curb cuts shall be minimized, so that pedestrian circulation along the sidewalk is minimally impeded_ The project does not include any additional curb cuts that will impede circulation. k Guidelines: The pedestrian environment shall be given priority and importance in the design of projects. Sidewalks and/or pathways shall be provided and shall provide safe access to buildings from parking areas. Providing pedestrian connections to abutting properties is an important aspect of connectivity and encourages pedestrian activity and shall be considered. Pathways shall be easily identifiable to pedestrians and drivers. Standard: A pedestrian circulation system of pathways that are clearly delineated and connect buildings, open space, and parking areas with the sidewalk system and abutting properties shall be provided. a. Pathways shall be located so that there are clear sight lines, to increase safety. b. Pathways shall bean all-weather or permeable walking surface, unless the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed surface is appropriate for the anticipated number of users and complementary to the design of the development. Sidewalks and hardscape associated with the plaza will be concrete. Landscape species within the plaza and along the 3'd Street sidewalk have been chosen to specifically address visibility into the site toward the library. Standard: Pathways within parking areas shall be provided and differentiated by material or texture (i.e., raised walkway, stamped concrete, or pavers) from abutting paving materials. Permeable materials are encouraged. The pathways shall be perpendicular to the applicable building facade and no greater than one hundred fifty feet (150') apart. Paving types are indicated on the Landscape Site plan L1_00. There are no proposed walkways that cross parking areas in the current design. Standard: Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of buildings shall be of sufficient width to accommodate anticipated numbers of users. Specifically: a. Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of mixed use and retail buildings one hundred (100) or more feet in width (measured along the facade) shall provide sidewalks at least twelve feet (12') in width. The pathway shall include an eight -foot (8') minimum unobstructed walking surface. b. Interior pathways shall be provided and shall vary in width to establish a hierarchy. The widths shall be based on the intended number of users; to be no smaller than five feet (S') and no greater than twelve feet (12'). A 12' sidewalk is being provided along 3`d Street. Standard: Mid -block connections between buildings shall be provided. The project does not include any mid -block connections. Guidelines: Developments located at street intersections should provide pedestrian -oriented space at the street corner to emphasize pedestrian activity (illustration below). Recreation and common open space areas are integral aspects of quality development that encourage pedestrians and users. These areas shall be provided in an amount that is adequate to be functional and usable; they shall also be landscaped and located so that they are appealing to users and pedestrians. Standard: All mixed use residential and attached housing developments of ten (10) or more dwelling units shall provide common opens space and/or recreation areas. NA Standard: Amount of common space or recreation area to be provided: at minimum fifty (50) square feet per unit. The project includes a large public plaza that faces Logan and 3'd Street. Standard: The location, layout, and proposed type of common space or recreation area shall be subject to approval by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. The current design of the public plaza has been reviewed by Renton Parks Department_ Standard: Open space or recreation areas shall be located to provide sun and light exposure to the area and located so that they are aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. The design of the public plaza allows for ample sun exposure, and is visibly linked to the existing public piazza located immediately to the east. Standard: At least one of the following shall be provided in each open space and/or recreation area (the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require more than one of the following elements for developments having more than one hundred (100) units): 1) Courtyards, plazas, or multi-purpose open spaces; 2) Upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens/pea-patches- Such spaces above the street level must feature views or amenities that are unique to the site and are provided as an asset to the development; 3) Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive recreation and separate from the public street system; 4) Recreation facilities including, but not limited to, tennis/sports courts, swimming pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other similar facilities; or 5) Children's play spaces that are centrally located near a majority of dwelling units and visible from surrounding units. They shall also be located away from hazardous areas such as garbage dumpsters, drainage facilities, and parking areas. The design includes a public plaza. Standard: The following shall not be counted toward the common open space or recreation area requirement: 1) Required landscaping, driveways, parking, or other vehicular use areas; 2) Required yard setback areas. Except for areas that are developed as private or semi -private (from abutting or adjacent properties) courtyards, plazas or passive use areas containing landscaping and fencing sufficient to create a fully usable area accessible to all residents of the development; 3) Private decks, balconies, and private ground floor open space; and 4) Other required landscaping and sensitive area buffers without common access links, such as pedestrian trails. NA Standard: All buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian -oriented space. NA Standard: The pedestrian -oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses shall be provided according to the following formula: 1% of the site area + 1% of the gross building area, at minimum. NA Standard: The pedestrian -oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses shall include all of the following: 1) Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier -free access) to the abutting structures from the public right-of-way or a nonvehicular courtyard; and 2) Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving; and 3) On-site or building -mounted lighting providing at least four (4) foot-candles (average) on the ground; and 4) At least three (3) lineal feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.) or one individual seat per sixty (60) square feet of plaza area or open space. NA Standard: The following areas shall not count as pedestrian -oriented space for buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses: 1) The minimum required walkway. However., where walkways are widened or enhanced beyond minimum requirements, the area may count as pedestrian -oriented space if the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee determines such space meets the definition of pedestrian -oriented space. 2) Areas that abut landscaped parking lots, chain link fences, blank walls, and/or dumpsters or service areas. NA Standard: Outdoor storage (shopping carts, potting soil bags, firewood, etc.) is prohibited within pedestrian -oriented space. NA Standard: At each corner of the intersections listed below, a public plaza shall be provided: 1) Benson Area: Benson Drive S./108th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 176`h. 2) Bronson Area: Intersections with Bronson Way North at: a) Factory Avenue N./Houser Way S.; b) Garden Avenue N.; and c) Park Avenue N. and N. First Street. 3) Cascade Area: Intersection of 116th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 168th Street. 4) Northeast Fourth Area: Intersections with N.E. Fourth at: a) Duvall Avenue N.E.; b) Monroe Avenue N.E.; and c) Union Avenue N.E. 5) Grady Area: Intersections with Grady Way at: a) Lind Avenue S.W_; b) Rainier Avenue S.; c) Shattuck Avenue S.; and d) Talbot Road S. 6) Puget Area: Intersection of S. Puget Drive and Benson Road S. 7) Rainier Avenue Area: Intersections with Rainier Avenue S. at: a) Airport Way/Renton Avenue S.; b) S. Third Street/S.W. Sunset Boulevard; c) S. Fourth Street; and d) S. Seventh Street. 8) North Renton Area: Intersections with Park Avenue N. at: a) N. Fourth Street; and b) N. Fifth Street. 9) Northeast Sunset Area: Intersections with N.E. Sunset Boulevard at: a) Duvall Avenue N.E.; and b) Union Avenue N.E. NA Standard: The public plaza shall measure no less than one thousand (1,000) square feet with a minimum dimension of twenty feet (20') on one side abutting the sidewalk. The public plaza measures roughly 90'x 90' Standard: The public plaza must be landscaped consistent with RMC 4-4-070, including at minimum street trees, decorative paving, pedestrian -scaled lighting, and seating. The public plaza will be designed in compliance with RMC 4-4-70. Refer to sheet 1-1_00. Guidelines: Building facades shall be modulated and/or articulated to reduce the apparent size of buildings, break up long blank walls, add visual interest, and enhance the character of the neighborhood. Articulation, modulation, and their intervals should create a sense of scale important to residential buildings. Standard: All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than forty feet (40'). Modulation is being provided along all three visible facades: • South: Windows and canopies occur at 18' increments and are 2'-6" in depth. • East: A front entry element and parapet building form help create visual interest along the fagade—as well as curtain wall supports that occur every 12'-6" • North: there are two recesses in the building fagade to accommodate egress and delivery—creating visual interest and modulation. Standard: Modulations shall be a minimum of two feet (2') deep, sixteen feet (16') in height, and eight feet (8') in width. Modulations are in compliance with these size criteria. Standard: Buildings greater than one hundred sixty feet (160') in length shall provide a variety of modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the facade (illustration in District B, below); or provide an additional special feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain, or public gathering area. The proposed building is not longer than 160' in length. Guidelines: The use of material variations such as colors, brick, shingles, stucco, and horizontal wood siding is encouraged. The primary building entrance should be made visibly prominent by incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or ornamental lighting (illustration below). Detail features should also be used, to include things such as decorative entry paving, street furniture (benches, etc.), and/or public art. Standard: Human -scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape feature shall be provided along the facade's ground floor. Human -scaled elements are included along the building's three facades: • Canopies, street trees and lighting along 3rd Street • Large overhang along the east plaza. • Canopies, recesses, ramps, and landscaping along the parking easement Standard: On any facade visible to the public, transparent windows and/or doors are required to comprise at least fifty percent (50%) of the portion of the ground floor facade that is between four feet (4') and eight feet (8') above ground (as measured on the true elevation). Between 4' and 8', the South elevation is 81% glazed. Between 4' and 8', the East elevation is 74% glazed. Between 4' and 8', the North elevation is 48% glazed. Although this does not meet the 50% standard, it does meet the intent of the guideline. Behind the North facade are located all of the service functions of the proposed library, most of which do not require a lot of glazing. Modulation and interest is provided by the use of a terra cotta the rainscreen system combined with terra cotta screening elements. In addition there are two niches in the elevation at the location of the two emergency exits. Standard: Upper portions of building facades shall have clear windows with visibility into and out of the building. However, screening may be applied to provide shade and energy efficiency. The minimum amount of light transmittance for windows shall be fifty percent (50%). Clerestory windows are specified to have clear glazing and exterior motorized metal blinds_ Standard: Display windows shall be designed for frequent change of merchandise, rather than permanent displays. All windows will reflect dynamic activity due to the proximity of public seating, collection and library programming. Standard: Where windows or storefronts occur, they must principally contain clear glazing. All windows are currently specified to include clear glazing. Standard: Tinted and dark glass, highly reflective (mirror -type) glass and film are prohibited. All windows are currently specified to include clear glazing. Standard: Untreated blank walls visible from public streets, sidewalks, or interior pedestrian pathways are prohibited. 1) A wall (including building facades and retaining walls) is considered a blank wall if: a) it is a ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall over six feet (6') in height, has a horizontal length greater than fifteen feet (15'), and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing; or b) Any portion of a ground floor wall has a surface area of four hundred (400) square feet or greater and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing. NA Standard: If blank walls are required or unavoidable, they shall be treated. The treatment shall be proportional to the wall and use one or more of the following: 1) A planting bed at least five feet (5') in width containing trees, shrubs, evergreen ground cover, or vines abutting the blank wall; 2) Trellis or other vine supports with evergreen climbing vines; 3) Architectural detailing such as reveals, contrasting materials, or other special detailing that meets the intent of this standard; 4) Artwork, such as bas-relief sculpture, mural, or similar; or 5) Seating area with special paving and seasonal planting. Guidelines: Building roof lines shall be varied and include architectural elements to add visual interest to the building. Standard: At least one of the following elements shall be used to create varied and interesting roof profiles: 1) Extended parapets; 2) Feature elements projecting above parapets; 3) Projected cornices; and/or 4) Pitched or sloped roofs. 5) Roof mounted mechanical equipment shall not be visible to pedestrians 6) Buildings containing predominantly residential uses shall have pitched roofs with a minimum slope of one to four (1:4) and shall have dormers or interesting roof forms that break up the massiveness of an uninterrupted sloping roof. The project includes an extended parapet, concealed mechanical equipment, and projected ii hangs &canopies. Guidelines: Building materials are an important and integral part of the architectural design of a building that is attractive and of high quality. Material variation shall be used to create visual appeal and eliminate monotony of facades. This shall occur on all facades in a consistent manner. High quality materials shall be used. If materials like concrete or block walls are used they shall be enhanced to create variation and enhance their visual appeal. Standard: All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open space shall be finished with the same building materials, detailing, and color scheme. A different treatment may be used if the materials are of the same quality. The project includes a variety of building materials visible to the public way: concrete, aluminum windows, and terra cotta panels. Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns or textural changes. The aluminum window system will have repeating support members, and the concrete elements will include form tie patterns. The terra cotta wall areas will be comprised of (2) shades of color and will reflect vertical banding. Standard: Materials shall be durable, high quality, and consistent with more traditional urban development, such as brick, integrally colored concrete masonry, pre -finished metal, stone, steel, glass and cast -in-place concrete. The project includes a variety of building materials visible to the public way: concrete, aluminum windows, and terra cotta panels. Standard: if concrete is used, walls shall be enhanced by techniques such as texturing, reveals, and/or coloring with a concrete coating or admixture. The concrete elements will display form tie patterns and panel jointing. Standard: If concrete block walls are used, they shall be enhanced with integral color, textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative bond pattern and/or shall incorporate other masonry materials. NA Standard: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns, or textural changes. The aluminum window system will have repeating support members, and the concrete elements will include form tie patterns. The terra cotta wall areas will be comprised of (2) shades of color and will reflect vertical banding. Guidelines: Front -lit, ground -mounted monument signs are the preferred type of freestanding sign. Blade type signs, proportional to the building facade on which they are mounted, are encouraged on pedestrian -oriented streets. Alteration of trademarks notwithstanding, corporate signage should not be garish in color nor overly lit, although creative design, strong accent colors, and interesting surface materials and lighting techniques are encouraged. Standard: Signage shall be an integral part of the design approach to the building. Signage has not yet been designed or located for this project, however, the King County Library System has a repertoire of standard signage which includes both ground mounted and blade signage. Standard: Entry signs shall be limited to the name of the larger development. NA Standard: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location. The King County Library System has a repertoire of standard signage that includes the logo in various sizes. A sign will be selected that reflects an appropriately scaled logo_ Standard: In mixed use and multi -use buildings, signage shall be coordinated with the overall building design. NA Standard: Freestanding ground -related monument signs, with the exception of primary entry signs, shall be limited to five feet (Y) above finished grade, including support structure. All such signs shall include decorative landscaping (ground cover and/or shrubs) to provide seasonal interest in the area surrounding the sign. Alternately, signage may incorporate stone, brick, or other decorative materials as approved by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. Signage has not yet been designed or located for this project, however, the King County Library System has a repertoire of standard signage which includes ground mounted sign designs. Standard: All of the following are prohibited: 1) Pale signs; 2) Roof signs; and 3) Back -lit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic sheet (can signs or illuminated cabinet signs). Exceptions: Back -lit logo signs less than ten (10) square feet are permitted, as are signs with only the individual letters back -lit. Pole signage, roof signage and back lit signage will not be included. Guidelines: Lighting that improves pedestrian safety and also that creates visual interest in the building and site during the evening hours shall be provided. Standard: Pedestrian -scale lighting shall be provided at primary and secondary building entrances. Examples include sconces on building facades, awnings with down -lighting and decorative street lighting. Lighting is being included under all exterior canopies and main entry. Standard: Accent lighting shall also be provided on building facades (such as sconces) and/or to illuminate other key elements of the site such as gateways, specimen trees, other significant landscaping, water features, and/or artwork. The landscape design for the plaza will be in accordance with these standards, yet not contribute to local'light pollution. Standard: Downlighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe pedestrian and vehicular movement, unless alternative pedestrian scale lighting has been approved administratively or is specifically listed as exempt from provisions located in RMC 4-4-075. Lighting, Exterior On -Site (i.e., signage, governmental flags, temporary holiday or decorative lighting, right -of -way -lighting, etc.). Downlighting is being incorporated at the exterior canopies, and as exterior site lighting. PLANNING DIVISION City Of Renton BAR21Division 7&1� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST �ngD City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROIECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. - 1 - 06109 PARenton Library)0ocumentsMA9enaesM Land Use S Demo AppiicationsM 2-0327 SUBMrrrALICU + SA + ECF105 - environmental check3ist.doc A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: RENTON LIBRARY 2. Name of applicant: KING COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM in conjunction with CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT Of COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Greg Smith King County Library System Service Center 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, WA 98027 425.369.3237 Peter Renner City of Renton Renton City Hall 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425.430.6605 4. Date checklist prepared: March 27, 2012 5. Agency requesting checklist: Demolition Permit: Development Services Division Conditional Use Permit: Planning Division Site Plan Review: Planning Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): We would like the submittals expedited as promptly as possible. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. Not at this time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated 9.1.2011, prepared by Landau Associates Pre -Demolition Hazardous Materials Survey, dated 6.6.2011, prepared by Landau Associates -2- 06109 RRenton Library�Documents104_Agencies102 Land Use & demo Applicauons112-0327 SUSMITTABW + SA + ECF05 - environmental checklistdoc 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There are no other pending proposals for this site. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Demolition Permit Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Review Environmental Review Parking Modification Right of Way Use Permit Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The subject property consists of two parcels / three lots, totaling 16,621 SF. It currently has an unused commercial building, the former Big 5 store, with a ground floor of 10,985 SF (gross) and a mezzanine of 2,459 SF (gross). The remaining East end of the site is currently a parking lot. North of the subject property is a utility easement, and east of the property is the Gateway Park, both of which are also part of the proposed project. This project proposes the demolition of the existing building. First any asbestos - containing materials identified in the Hazardous Materials Survey will be removed by Certified Asbestos Workers. Then the contractor will dismantle/demolish and remove: the building itself, and the small trees and shrubbery along the north property line. The existing asphalt parking lot at the East end of the property will remain in place for site stabilization until the new construction is ready to begin. This project further proposes the construction of a new library for downtown Renton. The gross area of the main level is: 15,083 SF. In addition to the construction of the new library building, there will be site improvements adjacent to the subject property. North of the property is a Seattle Public Utilities Right -of -Way. This currently has street parking that is not in compliance with city standards. The proposed improvements in this area will bring it into compliance with the city's landscape standards. To the East of the library property is Gateway Park. Proposed improvements here will improve security of this area and also create an entry plaza space for the new library. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the -3- 06!09 R Renton Library4Documentsl04_Agencies102 Land Use & Demo ApplicatiansM-0327 SUBMITTAL= + SA + ECR05 - environmental checklist.doc range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. B. 1. Quarter -Section -Township -Range: 5E-18-23-5 Existing Commercial Building Parcel: Plat Lot/ Unit Number: Address: Existing Parking Lot Parcel: Plat Lot/ Unit Number: Address: Gateway Park Parcel: Plat Lot/ Unit Number: Address - 784180 -019S 3-4 510 South 3rd Street Renton, WA 98055 784180-0205 5 South 3`d Street Renton, WA 98055 569600-0005 1 528 South 3td Street Renton, WA 98055 Right-ef-Way City of Seattle Cedar River Pipe Line Parcel: 000720-0188 Address: Shattuck Ave South Renton, WA 98055 ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH a. b. C, General description of the site (circle one); flat, Felkng, hilly, steep slepes, Fneuntaineus,they — -- What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 2% What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The subsurface conditions at the site generally consist of interbedded layers of soft to medium stiff silts and clays, and loose sand with variable amounts of silt, underlain by dense sands and gravels with variable amounts of silt and occasional cobbles. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. - 4 - 06109 R'Renton Ubrary4DocumentsW4 AgenmesX02 Land Use & Demo ApplicationsN 2-0327 SUSMrrrALICU f SA 4 ECR05 - environmental checklist.doc 2. AIR No. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Estimated earthwork quantities: Cut: 1,320 cubic yards (Native Soils) Fill: 1,030 cubic yards (Imported Structural Fill) For the new library, excavation will occur to accommodate a depressed slab for the proposed access floor plenum. In addition, geothermal bore holes will be drilled underneath the proposed building, producing drilling spoils that will be hauled off site. No substantial fill occurring on site. Material will be imported from WSDOT approved pits as needed to fill void areas of removed footings from the existing building demolition. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion is not likely. The site is flat and any exposed soils will be covered with an ail -weather construction surface prior to construction About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Within the land parcel in which the building construction is to occur, 100% of the site will be covered with the new building and impervious surfaces. Within the park parcel to the east, it is assumed that approximately 50% will be covered with impervious surfaces. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Existing soils will be covered with an all-weather construction surface, likely crushed rock or rip rap prior to building construction, which will protect the soils from rain water and wind. Soil stock piles will be covered with plastic as needed during construction. During dry summer months, a water truck may be utilized to prevent wind-blown dust What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. We do not anticipate any significant emissions outside of equipment exhaust. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Not that we are aware of at this time. -s- OWN P71Renton Library0ocumentslQ4_AgenciesQ2 Land Use & Demo Applicabonsll2-0327 SUBMITTALICU + SA + ECFN05 - environmental checklist.doc C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No surface water body exists on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. The Cedar River flows near the site, approximately % mile to the north east. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. -s- 06/09 PARentan Library0ocuments104_AgencleM02 Land Use & Demo AppiicationsN2-0327 SUBMITTAL%CU * SA + ECRO5 - environmental checklist.doc None. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Storm water runoff from the proposed building roof will be collected on site and routed through permanent below ground pipes to the existing storm drainage system in adjacent City streets. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. Construction storm water will be captured and treated prior to discharge to the existing below grade piped storm drainage system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water will be captured on site and conveyed to the existing below grade piped storm drainage system. No ground water will be collected or discharged as part of this project. 4. PLANTS Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _X_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All existing vegetation will be removed as follows: (28) 2"- 8" caliper existing deciduous trees will be removed. Approximately 4,600 SF of shrub & groundcover beds are to be removed. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to be on the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The planting palette will include native and non-native adapted/drought tolerant species. Plantings will include trees, shrubs, groundcovers and turf areas. 5. ANIMALS 11FA 06109 P:1Renton LibrarjADowrnenWD4_Agencies102 Land Use & Demo ApplicaUonsll2-0327 SUBMITTAL= + SA + EGF165 - environmental checklisLdoc 6. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other NA Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other NA Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other NA b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The site does not support any threatened or endangered species that we are aware of at this time. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain The site is not part of any migration pattern we are aware of at this time. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: We are not planning any wildlife enhancement measures. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. At this time, the project includes a closed-loop geothermal energy source, powering under -floor heating and cooling. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. This project should not affect the potential use of solar power by adjacent properties. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Electrical Conservation features: We will use LED, fluorescent, and ceramic metal halide lamps, which are the most energy efficient lighting options available. We are targeting a 10% or better below energy code for lighting. We will have daylight dimming controls in all daylight zones and occupancy sensors in non-active rooms. Mechanical Conservation features: The mechanical system will consist of geothermal boreholes coupled with water -source heat pumps to provide heating and cooling via an under -floor air distribution system. Water conserving plumbing fixtures will be installed. Thermal Conservation features: the building thermal envelope is designed to meet or exceed the requirements in the Washington State Energy Code and will consist of high performance fenestration systems, opaque wall systems, and roof assemblies." - 8 - 06/09 P, Renton Librar/Documents104_Agen6as102 Land Use 8 Demo Apoications112-0327 SUBMITTAL= * SA + ECROS - environmental checklist.doc 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. We do not anticipate exposure to toxic chemicals or other environmental health hazards as a part of this proposal. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. We do not anticipate any special emergency services being required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not Applicable. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Nearby traffic noise does exist as the adjacent S. 3rd St. is a main arterial, however we do not anticipate that it will adversely affect this project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction, a temporary increase in noise in the vicinity is anticipated due to construction activities and the use of machines such as earth movers, compactors, trucks, and other typical construction equipment. The hours of construction activity are anticipated to be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. and will not exceed the maximum permissible noise levels, as determined by WAC Chapter 173- 60. The library's general hours of operation are anticipated to be as follows: Monday —Thursday 10am — 9pm Friday 10am — 6pm Saturday loam — Spm Sunday fpm — 5pm Additionally, a range of vehicles will make deliveries to the library. The refuse/recycling enclosure has been located at the northwest corner of the project site, as far from the bulk of pedestrian traffic as possible. Noise impacts to neighboring uses are not anticipated as a result of the library and associated activities. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Although noise impacts are not anticipated and the project is not required to implement noise mitigation, the proposed library is planned -9- 06!09 Rnenton LibraryM)ocumentsZ4_Agencies%02 Land Use & Demo Application02-0327 SUBMITTALICU + SA + ECFW5 - environmental checklist.doc to be constructed with sound insulation or other means to achieve a day/night average interior noise level of 45 Ldn. S. LAND AND SHORELINE USE What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Adjacent to this project site are the following uses: • NORTH: mixed use and multi -family structures • EAST: transit center, event center and public park • SOUTH: low-rise commercial • WEST: residential and commercial space b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. C. Describe any structures on the site. The subject property consists of two parcels / three lots, totaling 16,621 SF. It currently has an unused commercial building, the former Big 5 store, with a ground floor of 10,985 SF (gross) and a mezzanine of 2,459 SF (gross). The remaining East end of the site is currently a parking lot. North of the subject property is a utility easement, and east of the property is the Gateway Park, both of which are also part of the proposed project. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? This project proposes the demolition of the existing building. First any asbestos -containing materials identified in the Hazardous Materials Survey will be removed by Certified Asbestos Workers. Then the contractor will dismantle/demolish and remove: the building itself, and the small trees and shrubbery along the north property line. The existing asphalt parking lot at the East end of the property will remain in place for site stabilization until the new construction is ready to begin. What is the current zoning classification of the site? CD — Center Downtown f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? UC -D (Urban Center Downtown) If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. -i0- 06/09 P:1Renton LibraryhDocuments164_Agenbea102 Land Use & Demo Applicabonsll2-0327 SUBMITTALICU + SA + ECRO5 - environmental checkiist.doc Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Full time staff at any one time would be between 5-7 employees. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Documents being submitted describe measures being taken to ensure compatibility with land use code. 9. HOUSING Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The building height at the top of the parapet is 32'-6", sized to conceal all rooftop mechanical units. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views from the lower level of existing buildings will be able to see the new building, rather than the currently vacant Big 5 store. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any; The project proposes a variety of building materials that would be used in a careful exterior building design. The design is intended to provide an aesthetically pleasing environment that complements nearby uses. The proposed building design for the library respectfully integrates well with the nearby low-rise downtown buildings through the similar massing. Programmatic arrangement emphasizing traditional library functions along the south elevation, and reinterpretation of clay masonry as a PARenton L1tuaryMacuments104_Agencies102 Land Use & demo ApphcaOons1l2-0327 SUBMITTALICU + SA + ECROS - environmental checklist.doc building material. The design itself is complemented by landscaping and pedestrian features such as a plaza and benches. Street trees will be provided. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The lighting for this project will be low glare and comfortable. The proposal includes the addition of three new streetlights, per city standard. Four existing pedestrian -height streetlights will be replaced with the city standard. Finally, as part of the project, the existing streetlight at the southwest corner of the project site will be removed. Downlights with excellent shielding and cutoff will be incorporated into canopies. Lighting will occur from dawn to dusk. Some non-critical lights may be controlled to turn off after hours or in the later evening hours to further reduce light impact. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light and glare are not anticipated to be a safety hazard or interfere with views. Any outdoor luminaires that might be used would be well shielded and directed downward to illuminate the intended surface and minimize glare to motorists and adjacent buildings and uses. Additional lighting may be used to illuminate the exterior wall area and/or the underside of the roof of the proposed building. Those lighting fixtures would also be well shielded to mitigate glare potential, and be designed to direct light to the intended surface(s) and would not allow light to shine uncontrolled. Therefore, the project would not be a safety hazard, interfere with views, or pollute the night sky. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No offsite light sources are anticipated to affect this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Light levels will meet but not exceed Illuminating Engineering Society (IES — produces lighting standards for the lighting industry) recommendations to provide the minimum industry standard amount of light and minimize over lighting the space. Any outdoor luminaires would be directed downward to illuminate the intended surface and minimize glare. Additional lighting may be used to illuminate the exterior wall area and/or the underside of the roof of the proposed buildings. Those lighting features would also be designed to direct light to the surface(s) intended to be lighted and be well shielded to not would not allow light -12- 06109 PARenton LibraryADoCuments%D�_Agenciesk02 Land Use & Demo Applicadons112-0327 SUBMITTAL= + SA + ECFl05 - environmental checklistdoc to shine uncontrolled beyond the target surfaceis). In addition, new street trees will filter or block glare. Controls could be used to turn off non-critical lighting after-hours to further reduce light impact. 12. RECREATION What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? According to the City of Renton website, there are a number of recreational activities in the greater Renton area. However, none of those are immediately adjacent to the building site. There is an open plaza and event space located directly east of the project where informal events are held such as the farmer's market. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. !None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. South 3`d Street runs east -west along the south elevation of the building. Logan Avenue runs north -south immediately to the east of the project site, and Morris Avenue South runs north -south half a block to the west of the building. Parking is included along the utility right-of-way located immediately north of the project site. Traffic will flow both directions within that right-of-way. -13- 06/09 R: Renton LibrarylDocumenW04_AgenciesW Land Use & Demo Applicabons1l2.0327 SUBMITTAL= + SA + ECROS - environmental checklist.doc b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The Renton Transit Center is within a block of the project site. It consists of ten boarding locations located between Logan Avenue South, Burnett Avenue South, South 2nd Street, and South 3rd Street. Approximately twenty-two METRO or Sound Transit routes are served providing transit connections to locations such as the Sea -Tac, Rainier Beach, Seattle, Kent, Bellevue, Black Diamond, Fairwood, Renton Highlands, Kennydale, Shoreline, and Burien. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will result in (50) parking stalls: (6) NEW spots in the utility right-of-way, (2) NEW parallel spots on S. 3rd St., and (42) EXISTING spats in the utility right-of-way. The project is eliminating the current parking lot east of the Big 5 building which contains (11) stalls. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No new roads or streets are required. There will be improvements to the Right -of -Way north of the project and to Gateway Park East of the project in order to bring these up to city standards. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Per the traffic mitigation estimate, prepared by City of Renton: the existing commercial structure generated 697.5 trips per day. The proposed library will generate 843.6 trips per day. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. -14- 06109 PARenton LibraryhDocuments104_Agencies102 Land Use & Demo Applicadons%12-0327 SUBMITTAL= + SA + ECR05 - environmental checkliskdoc 15. UTILITIES Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, ^„magas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The design team held a coordination meeting with the City of Renton, King County Library System (KCLS), and Seattle Public Utilites (SPU) to identify possible utility routes, fees, and considerations. Please refer to site plan(s) to see proposed routing of various utilities. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature: Name Printed: Maaike Post Date: 03.27.2012 -15- 06/OS P:4Renton Library)DocumentM04_AgenciesW2 Land Use & Demo Aprftations112-0327 SUBMITTAMU + SA+ ECF' 05 - environmental chealist.doc D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? -16- 06109 P:1Renton Library'D umentsa4_Agencies= Land Use & Como Applications412.0327 SUBMITTALICU + SA + ECR05 - environmental checMist.doc Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature: Name Printed: Date: -17- 06109 R: Renton LibraryADocuments104_AgenciesW2 Land Use & Demo ApplicationO2-0327 SUBMITTALICU + SA + ECR05 - environmental checklist.doo L_ft� 0- u IOWA AMENDMENT NO. 1 itY Of Renton TO LEASE AGREEMENT NO. 327-815I,'riing Division BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND THE CITY OF SEATTLE AND SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES MAR 2 7 2011 This Amendment to Lease Agreement No. 327-815, hereinafter referred to as "AmleEngulw made and entered into this c9 day of d 2011, by and between the CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, acting by and through its SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES, hereinafter referred to as "SEATTLE", and the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, hereafter referred to as "RENTON". WHEREAS, SEATTLE and RENTON entered into Lease Agreement No. 327-815, hereinafter referred to as "Lease Agreement", on November 9, 1998 and said Lease Agreement is attached under Exhibit A for reference; WHEREAS, SEATTLE and RENTON mutually desires to amend the Lease Agreement to extend the termination date and to revise Section 2; NOW, THEREFORE, SEATTLE and RENTON agrees to amend the Agreement as follows: In accordance with Section 20 of the Lease Agreement, the duration of the Agreement is extended until January 1, 2062. II. Paragraph 2 of the Lease Agreement is deleted in Its entirety and replaced with the following: 2. Renton's Use of the Leased Land. Renton's use of Parcel A shall be for public vehicle parking, which may include sole dedicated parking for and access to the abutting north site which is planned to be redeveloped as a KCLS (Ding County Library System) library and for a pedestrian crossing. During the construction of the library, portions of Parcel A may be fenced off and used as a staging area upon Seattle Public Utilities' written approval of the plans prior to using Parcel A for staging. Parcel 8 shall be used for park grounds. The leased land shall be used for these purposes only. All designs for construction, improvements or repairs to the parking, access to the abutting north site or park uses shall be approved in writing by Seattle prior to construction, as more clearly defined in Section 7. A copy of detailed as -built plans shall be provided to Seattle within 60 calendar days after construction is complete including any reconstruction plans. 111. No other provision of the Lease Agreement is affected by this Amendment. 1 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement No. 327-815 CITY OF RENTON r By: Denis Law, Mayor Date: �f �aft .t1- 4 ,1') iy'+ Attest: Bonnie 1. Walton, City Clerk Date: 7-49.5- 4W« 2 CITY OF SEATTLE / SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES n�l W---- - By: Title: Date: Copy u •- 2 CITY OF SEATTLE / SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES n�l W---- - By: Title: Date: Copy EXHIBIT "A" FOR AMENDMENT NO.1 TO LEASE AGREEMENT LEASE AG-REEMENI' NO. 327-915 (IS -23-5 SE) THIS LEASE AGxREEMRNT between THE crry OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE PUBLIC UTIL.ITMS, a municipal corporation, referred to -in this Agreement as "Seattle" and THE CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation, referred to in this Agreement as "Renton" (hereinafter collectively be referred to as the "Patties.") 'VT=SSETH , 1. remi e . Seattle hereby leases to Renton, and Renton hereby leases from Seattle, the real property, herein called "Leased Land" of 36,609 square feet, situated in the City of Renton, King County, State of Washington, described as follows; Park insz Purposes Parcel A: That portion of the City of Seattle, Cedar River Pipeline Right b£ Way located in Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M, King County, Washington situated in Blocks 1 and 6 of the Plat of Smithers Sixth Addition to Renton, Volume 26 of Plats, page 47, records of King County, WA., and Block l of the Plat of Motor Line Addition to Renton, Volume 9 of plats, page 50, records of King County, WA., lying north of South Third Street between the east margin of Morris Avenue South and wrest margin of Logan Avenue South, in Renton, Washington, and; Park PpZoss= Parcel B: That portion of the City of Seattle, Cedar River Pipeline Right of Way located in Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.K King County, Washington situated in Block 2 of the Plat of Motor Lute Addition to Renton, Volume 9 of Plats, page 50, records of King'County, WA, lying north of South Third Street and between the east margin of Logan Avenue South and the west margin of Burnett Ave. South, in Renton, Washington, being approximately. 2. Reer ton's Use oMe Leased Lard. Renton's use of Parcel A shall be used for public vehicle parking, access to the abutting north site and pedestrian dossing; and Parcel B shall be for park grounds. These parcels shall be used for these purposes only. AU parking, access to the abutting north site and park designs -shill be approved inwriting by Seattle prior to construction of said parking said access and park areas, as more clearly defined in Section 7. ,A copy of detailed as -built plans shall be provided to Seattle within 60 calendar days after construction is complete including any reconstruction plans. 3. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for forty (40) years, commencing on November 1, 199 8 and end in December 31, 203 S, unless canceled earlier under conditions set forth in this Agreement. 3.1 Effective Date November 1, 1998 shall constitute and be referred hereafter as the "Effective Date" of this Lease, or if later, at such time as Seattle City Council and the Seattle Mayor approve said lease. Renton shall obtain full possession of the Leased Land on said Effective Date. 4. Rent ' As consideration for the rights and privileges of this Lease Agreement, Seattle agrees to the abeyance of rent during the term of this Lease in exchange of a forty (40) year agreement, from Renton to Seattle, for the operation, maintenance, repair and reconstruction of Seattle's Cedar River Pipelines Nos. 1, 2 and 3 lying within and under the streets described below: (a). Cedar River Pipeline No. 1 (66 inch diameter) and No. 2 (51-1l2 inch diameter) across Houser Way South and in South P Street from Houser Way South to the west margin of Burnett Avenue South_ (b) Cedar River Pipeline No 3 (66 inch diameter) in ME Avenue South beginning at the southerly margin of the railroad within Houser Way South and extending northerly to South 2aa Street, thence westerly in South 2°d Street to a point 100 feet wet of the west margin of Logan Avenue South and the beginning of Seattle's fee -owned right-of-way. (c) That portion of Logan Avenue ,South, northerly of the Cedar River Pipelines to the City of Renton Linear Park. This portion is included herein under the condition, and in the event, that Boeing transfers the water main in this right-of-way to the City of Seattle. 4.1 Renton may not sublet the property nor charge or collect money or fees for use of the property by others, except to cover costs for public events. 4.2 If at any time during the 40 year rental period Seattle sells, transfers or in anyway disposes of its ownership of said pipelines, Seattle may either revoke this lease or charge the then current fair market rental value. Payment of Taxes, Utilities and Other Charges. 5.1 Utilities and Charges. Renton hereby covenants and agrees to pay, before delinquency, all charges for electricity, water, sewer, garbage removal, and all other public service or utility charges of every kind and type, charged, or imposed upon or against the Leased Land which are attributable to Renton's use. Renlea 2 10/30/98 6. Use of Leased Land, 6.1. Renton agrees to fully comply with all applicable requirements of State and Federal laws having jurisdiction over the Leased Land in connection with the use of the Leased Land. 6.2 Pollutants and Hazardous Substances During the term of this Permit Agreement, Renton agrees to keep the Leased Land in compliance with any and all Environmental Laws and not cause or permit the Leased Land to become contaminated with any Hazardous Substances or Pollutants in violation of Environmental Laws. Upon notice or discovery of any release of any Hazardous Substance caused by Renton or expressly authorized by Renton to occur upon the Leased Land, Renton shall, at its own cost, immediately take all necessary steps to report, respond to, and dean up the same and restore the Leased Land to its preexisting condition in accordance with applicable Environmental Laws and Requirements and shall report any such release, to Seattle within 24 hours of discovery. 7. Improvements. 7.1 Renton may repair and/or improve the vehicle parking area and install grass, small shrubs and other enhancements in the park area of said Leased Land, provided that plans for such improvements be approved by Seattle in writing prior to construction of any enhancements, improvements, installations or alterations. Seattle shall respond in writing to Renton within forty-five (45) days from Renton's submittal of plans to Seattle. Seattle's approval of said plans shall not be implied or held to constitute approval or compliance with environmental, safety and other applicable regulatory requirements. All work performed by Renton shall be performed in accordance with all applicable State and Federal regulations and requirements. For the protection of the pipelines Renton shall notify Se a at 425-255-2242 two days before any_ work is ,performed on said Leased Land. 7.2 No buildings, structures or rockeries of any type shall be placed upon the Leased Land unless specifically approved in writing by Seattle 7.3 Vehicular equipment/machinery, wheeled or tracked, exceeding a gross weight of 32,000 pounds per axle (HS 20-44) will be prohibited within said easement area. S. Acceptance and Care of Premises. Renton covenants and agrees that the Leased Land shall be occupied and used in an orderly, fit, and sanitary condition and that the Leased Land shall be left in the same or better condition at the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease as existed on the Effective Date. Renlea 10130/98 g. Surrender of Premises. 9.1 Renton agrees that at the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease, it will desist use of the Leased Land, including access to the abutting north property, and shall quit and surrender the Leased Land and deliver the Leased Land to Seattle. Renton will also remove, at its cost and expense, any or all improverrients placed on the Leased Land by Renton if requested by Seattle. 9.2 At the conclusion -of this Lease, Seattle shall, at its option, conduct a final site assessment to verify that the Leased Land's original environmental condition has been maintained during the Lease term, Renton shall fully remediate and restore any environmental damage to the Leased Land caused by Renton during the term of this Lease. 10. No Liens or Encumbrances. Renton agrees not to permit any lien or encumbrance from any source or for any purpose whatsoever to be placed against Seattle's interest in said Leased Land. 11. Hsld Harmless. Release and LiabilitXInsurance. 11.1 Renton's Indemnification. Renton, its successors, assigns, and guarantors agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Seattle, its officers, and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, damages, losses, liens, penalties, fines, expenses of every kind and nature, including attorney's fees, and liability for the following: 11.1.1 Any claims or liability arising from accident or injury or damage to property on or about the Leased Land caused by R.enton's use of said Leased Land, or by its agents, tenants, licensees, invitees, employees, or other occupants of the Leased Land. 11.1.2 As between the parties and for the purposes of the foregoing obligations Renton waives any immunity, defense or other protection that may be afforded by any workers compensation, industrial insurance or similar laws [including buy not limited to, the Washington Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington). 11.1.3 Any activities or use of the Leased Land by Renton which cause or knowingly pen -nit the release or the threatened release of any Hazardous Substance on the Leased Land. 11. 1.4 This indemnification shall survive the termination of this Lease. This indemnification shall not apply to Hazardous Substances generated, discharged, or deposited on the Leased Land prior to the Effective Date of this Lease. Additionally, this indemnification shall not apply to Hazardous Substances generated, discharged or deposited on the Leased Land Renlea 4 10/30/98 after the Effective Date which arise from Seattle's activities on the Leased Land, and shall not apply to Hazardous Substances which migrate onto the Leased Land from off site. Seattle, at its sole expense may employ additional counsel of its choice to associate with counsel defending against any such claims, lawsuits, or administrative proceedings. 11.2 Renton's Insurance. Renton will provide and keep in full force and effect during the term of this Lease, public liability insurance with limits of not less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) covering injuries to persons, including death, and loss of or damage to real and personal property. Such insurance may be provided under Renton's blanket comprehensive liability insurance policy. During the term of this Lease, Seattle shall be named as an additional insured under such insurance to the extent of Renton's undertaking set forth in Section 11.1. entitled "Renton's Indemnification." including any claims of accident, injury, or damage arising from Renton's use of the Leased Land. A certificate evidencing such insurance coverage shall be delivered to S cattle not less than fd1cen (15) days prior to the commencement of the Term hereof, Such certificate of insurance will provide for fifteen (15) days advance notice in the event of cancellation. 11.2.1 if Renton is self-insured Renton will provide S cattle with written evidence to that effect. Renton must require any contractor and/or subcontractor working or using this site on behalf of Renton, to maintain insurance coverage in accordance with ,Section 11.2. 12. Repair, Removal, Relocation. 12.1 Renion acknowledges that the explicit purpose of this property is for the operation, maintenance, repair, construction and reconstruction of water pipelines; all other uses are subordinate to this use. Seattle shall not be responsible for Renton's facilities when Seattle finds it necessary to repair, construct or reconstruct the pipelines, or in any way disrupt the right-of-way for the operation and maintenance of said pipelines, however, in case of excavation by Seattle, Seattle shall replace fill to grade. During such occurrences, Renton shall, at no expense to Seattle, replace, adjust, remove, relocate or reconstruct its facilities, including all landscaping, appurtenant facilities and service lines, within the Seattle right-of-way. Except in emergencies, Seattle will give Renton written notice of such requirement as soon as practicable. In emergency situations, Seattle shall have the right to tow vehicles off the right-of-way and to post signs or have Renton post signs accordingly. 12.2 As regards to Paragraph 12. 1, Seattle will not be responsible or liable for the access to the site for any reason whatsoever. 13. Taking. In the event of an eminent domain taking, the Parties agree that Seattle shall be entitled to all condemnation awards granted for the taking of the land and improvements, except any sums awarded as compensation for the improvements placed an the Leased Land by Renton. Renlea 10/30/98 14. Right of Termination. 14.1 In addition to the speciftc rights of S eattle or Renton to terminate this Lease as more particularly set forth in this Lease, at any time during the term of this Lease, Renton shall have a general right to terminate this Lease in the event that it determines, at its sole discretion, the Leased Land has become unsuitable for the uses designated in Section 2 above. In such event, Renton shall provide Seattle no less than sixty (60) days written notice prior to the proposed termination date, unless otherwise specified in this Lease, and surrender the properly in accordance with Section 9 of this Lease. The indemnification, duties to comply with law and duties to restore property, provided under this Lease, shall survive termination. 14.2 In addition to the specific rights of Renton to terminate this Lease, at any time during the term of this Lease, Seattle shall have a right to terminate this Lease in the event it determines, at its sole discretion, Renton's use of the Leased Land does not meet regulatory requirements or standards. 15. Default. If at any time during the term of this Lease Renton shall fail to comply with any of the other terms and conditions of this Lease, Seattle shall give written notice to Renton of such default and request Renton to comply with the terms and provisions of this Lease, as the case may be. If such default is not cured within thirty (30) days of Renton's receipt of Seattle's written notice as to the default, or within such period as Seattle determines is reasonable if Seattle determines that the condition caused by such default is a threat to public health and safety, or the environment, S cattle shall have, in addition to such remedies as may be afforded by the laws of the State of Washington, the power and right to declare this Lease terminated and reenter the Leased Land, but notwithstanding such remedies or termination and reentry by S cattle, Renton covenants and agrees to make good to Seattle any deficiency arising from the reentry, removal of personal property and/or improvements, and restoration of the Leased Land and to pay such deficiency upon demand of Seattle, lb, Seattle May Perform. If Renton fails to do any actor thing required to be done by Renton under this Lease, S cattle shall notify Renton of such failure, and give Renton thirty (3 0) days to perform such act or thing, except for conditions which pose a threat to public health, safety or the environment. In the event Renton fails to perform within said thirty (30) days, Seattle shall have the right at its sole option, but not the obligation, to do such act or thing on behalf of Renton and upon notification ofSeattle's reasonable expenditure in connection therewith, Renton shall immediately repay Seattle the amount thereof plus interest at the prevailing rent, per annum, from the date of Seattle's invoice for said expenditure to the date of Renton's repayment. 17. Attorneys' Fees. If any suit or legal action is instituted in connection with any controversy or default arising out of this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover costs including such sum as the court may adjudge as reasonable attorney fees and reasonable attorneys' fees on appeaL Renlea 6 10/30/98 18. Non -Waiver, The failure of either party to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms and provisions of this Lease shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of any such terms or conditions, or of any other term or condition, but the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. 19. Notices. Any notice, consent, request, or other communication provided for in this Lease shall be in writing. Such notice, consent, request, or other communication shall be sent by mail to the Seattle, by mailing the same to Seattle at: Seattle Public Utilities Real Property Services 710 Second Avenue, 9th Floor Seattle, WA 98104 Such notice, consent, request or other communication shall be sent by snail to the Renton, by mailing the same to Renton at: City of Renton Planning(Building/Public Works Department 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Notices sent by mail shall be deemed to have been given when properly mailed; the postmark affixed by United States Post Office shall be conclusive evidence of the date of mailing. The party to receive the notice, consent, request, or other communication may hereafter designate another address to the other party, in which case the notice, consent, request or other communication shall be sent to that other address. Alternatively, such notice, consent, request or other communication may be personally delivered to the party to receive the same. parties. 20. Extension. This Lease Agreement may by extended upon mutual agreement of the 21. Assignment or Subletting. Renton may not sublet or assign this Lease Agreement. 22. Jurisdiction. This permit is intended to convey limited rights and interest only, None of the rights granted to Renton shall affect jurisdiction of Seattle over the Leased Land or the Lessors power to perform work on said land. Renton shall in no way interfere with the Lessors present or future use of said Leased Land. 23. Binding Effect. The covenants and agreements of this Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Seattle and Renton and their heirs, executors, administrators, and successors. Renlea 7 10/30/98 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance 119202 of the City of Seattle, the parties hereto have executed this Lease thereunto duly authorized the day and year indicated below their signatures. ACCEPTED BY CITY OF RENTON: J se Taru�er ayor, City of Renton Date: 371 \R11A CITY OF SEATTLE: Diana Gale Director, Seattle Public Utilities ATTEST: Brenda Fritsvol, Deputy City Clerk Reales 10/30/98 AMERICAN LAND ,TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92) City OfIL Rento MAR 2 7 2012 1n]eCE# ,Ea CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SUB,fF-CT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, CHICAGO TI'T'LE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, hereit; called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of. 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketabihty of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. In Witness Whereof, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be signed and sealed as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signatory_ Issued by: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98109E ( 206) 628 - 5666 ALTA Owner's Policy {1017-42} CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: By: Secretary EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay foss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees of expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not Ilmited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (1) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (i) the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (lit) a separation In ownership ora change In the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (€v) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded In the public records at Date of Polity_ 2. nights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters. (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded In the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in lose or damage which would not have been sustained It the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or Interest Insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or Interest Insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (f) the transaction creating the estate or Interest Insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or Interest Insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. _1ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA A. 1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH SEATTLE, WA 98104 PoficyNo.: 432682 EXTENDED OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE A Amount of Date of Policy: JULY 7, 1995 at 2:20 PM Insurance: $900,000.00 1. Name of Insured: THE CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is: FEE SIMPLE 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: THE CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL, CORPORATION 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION CHICAGO TME INSURANCE"- COMPANY "TCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPAi. ' EXTENDED OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: Policy No.: 432682 LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 1, SMITHER`S SIXTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 26 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 6 VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 2779, WHICH ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW. PARCEL $: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL C: LOTS 2 THROUGH 5, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL D: LOT 14, BLOCK 2, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 6 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 910189. PARCEL E: LOT 15, BLOCK 2, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 6 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 910200, PARCEL F: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THAT PART OF BLOCK 2, SAID MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO RENTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 66 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOTS 2 AND 18 OF SAID BLOCK 2. PARCEL G: LOTS 16 AND 17, BLOCK 33, SMITHER`S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME.9 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 17, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; CHICAGO T rLE INSURANCE COMPANY -HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP ' , 1 Policy No.: 432682 EXTENDED OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 16 CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET, ALLEY AND ANY OTHER PUBLIC USES AND PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7401170345. PARCEL H: LOTS 18 THROUGH 21, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 33, SMITHER'S FIRST ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGES) 17, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CHUCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY `fCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA.. ' Policy NO.: 432682 EXTENDED OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss Or damage (and the Company wiU not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: AN 1. ENCROACHMENTS, OVERLAPS, BOUNDARY LINE DISPUTES, OR OTHER MATTERS WHICH WOULD BE DISCLOSED BY AN ACCURATE SURVEY AND INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES. A] 2. EASEMENTS, OR CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. AJ 3. TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. AK 4. ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, CONNECTION, MAINTENANCE, TAP, CAPACITY OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER, WATER, ELECTRICITY, OTHER UTILITIES, OR GARBAGE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL. AL 5. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS IN UNITED STATES PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; INDIAN TRIBAL CODES OR REGULATIONS, INDIAN TREATY OR ABORIGINAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING EASEMENTS OR EQUITABLE SERVITUDES. AM 6. WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS, OR TITLE TO WATER. CHICAGO TPIT.E INSURANCE COMPANY OWNEXM/2-L"I/RK HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP Policy No.: 432 682 EXTENDED OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE B (Continued) SPECIAL, EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RESERVED BY: CITY OF RENTON PURPOSE: UTILITY AREA AFFECTED: VACATED ALLEY WITHIN PARCEL A RECORDED: JUNE 18, 1973 RECORDING NUMBER: 7306180482 B SAID INSTRUMENT BEING CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 2779. c 2. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: CITY OF SEATTLE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND: PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK, TRUSTEE UNDER WILL OF JOHN SWANSON AND HAYDEN WILLIAMS ESTATE - RUTH WILLIAMS, JERAY HOLMES AND CAROLYN HOLMES, CO-EXECUTORS RECORDED: JANUARY 6, 1984 RECORDING NUMBER: 8401061023 REGARDING: PERMIT TO USE A PORTION OF CITY'S 66 FOOT WIDE CEDAR RIVER PIPELINE RIGHT OF WAY ADJACENT TO PARCELS B AND F D 3. RIGHT OF THE PUBLIC TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES IN THE REASONABLE ORIGINAL GRADING OF STREETS, AVENUES, ALLEYS, AND ROADS AS DEDICATED IN THE PLAT. F AFFECTS: PARCEL A AN 4. MEMORANDUM OF GROUND LEASE, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LEASE DISCLOSED THEREIN: LESSOR: CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON LESSEE: SHERIDAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED: JULY 7, 1995 RECOkDING NUMBER: 9507071004 ** END OF SCHEDULE 8 ** CHICAGO TPT LP- INSURANCE COMPANY OWNEXTES/213-911EK "ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPA, Policy No.: 432682 EXTENDED OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE B (Continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY Loan Policy Endorsements: N/A Owner's Policy Endorsements: N/A CHICAGO TrI'I.E INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO =L� -NSURANCE COMPANY 1$00 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE, SEATTLE, 11ASH[N8TON 98104 IMPOR'T'ANT: This is not a Survey. It is burnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. p }r a} as a• ♦} u- ° N of W6 } G y f/ � J ♦° K6 y Q ��� (A x 16 a N M 40 N f f x4 of a f• '14 4� ti 9 Q ��� 0 p E2 W Iff 40 40 4-0 44 a ! FOURTH 1 1;�a a. r 44 44 40 AO f f a PO o Iff 40 40 4-0 44 :ONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "Insured": the insured named in Schedule A, and, subject to any rights or defenses the Company would have had against the named insured, those who succeed to the interest of the named insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase including, but not limited to, heirs, distributees, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, next of kin, or corporate or fiduciary successors. (b) "insured claimant": an insured claiming loss or damage. (c) "knowledge" or "known": actual knowledge, not constructive knowl- edge or notice which may be Imputed to an insured by reason of the public records as defined in this policy or any other records which impart construc- tive notice of matters affecting the land. (d) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule A, and improve- ments affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to In Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways, but noth- ing herein shall modify or limit the extent to which a right of access to and from the land is insured by this policy. (e) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (f) "public records': records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of Imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. With respect to Section t (a)(1v) of the E=xclusions From Coverage, "Public records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States district court for the district in which the land is located. (g) '"unmarketab€lity of the title": an alleged or apparent matter affecting the title to the land, not excluded or excepted from coverage, which would entitle a purchaser of the estate or interest described in Schedule A to be released from the obligation to purchase by virtue of a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE AFTER CONVEYANCE OF TITLE The coverage of this policy shall continue In force as of Date of Policy in favor of an insured only so long as the Insured retains an estate or interest in the land, or holds an indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given by a purchaser from the insured, or only so long as the insured shall have liability by reason of covenants of warranty made by the insured in any transferor conveyance of the estate or interest. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the Insured of either (€) an estate or interest in the land, or (Ii) an indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given to the insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT The insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing () in case of any litigation as set forth in Section 4(a) below, (ii) in case knowledge shall came to an insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which IS adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as insured, and which might cause loss or dam- age for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (ill) if title to the estate o r interest, as insured, is rejected as unmarketable. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then as to the insured all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any insured under this policy unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 4. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS; DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE (a) Upon written request by the insured and subject to the options con- tained in Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim adverse to the title or interest as insured, but only as to those stated causes of action alleging a defect, lien or encumbrance or other matter insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the insured as to those stated causes of action and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by the insured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not insured against by this policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, at its own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this policy. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph. it shall do so diligently. (c) Whenever the Compa.., shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as required or permitted by the provisions of this policy, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent juris- diction and expressly reserves the right, In its sole discretion, to appeal from any adverse judgment or ardor. (d) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to prose- cute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, the insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of the insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (I) in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or pro- ceeding, or effecting settlement, and (i) in any other lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as insured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obliga- tion to defend, prosecute, or contlnue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. 5. PROOF OF LOSS OR DAMAGE In addition to and after the notices required under Section 3 of these Condi- tions and Stipulations have been provided the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the insured claimant shall be furnished to the Company within 90 days after the insured claimant shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the defect in, or lien or encumbrance on the title, or other matter insured against by this policy which constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. It the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured claimant to provide the required proof of lass or damage, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obliga- tion to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such proof of loss or damage. In addition, the insured claimant may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reason- able times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any autho- rized representative of the Company, the insured claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspon- dence and memoranda in the custody or control of ath€rd party, which reason- ably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the insured claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the insured claimant to submit for examination under oath, produce other reason- ably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably neces- sary information from third parties as required in this paragraph shall termi- nate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. B. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. To pay or tender payment of the amount of insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant, which were authorized by the Company, up to the time of payment or tender of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability and obligations to the insured under this policy, other than to matte the payment required, shall terminate, Including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or con- tinue any litigation, and the policy shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant, (i) to pay or otherwise settle with otheP parties for or in the name of an insured claimant any claim insured against under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company Is obligated to pay: or (ii) to pay or otherwise settle with the insured claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses Incurred by the Insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay Upon the exercise by the Company of eithe the options provided for in paragraphs (b)(�� or (ii), the Company's oblig to the insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, otherth - e payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prose- cute or continue any litigation. 7. DETERMINATION, EXTENT OF LIABILITY AND COINSURANCE This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or dam- age sustained or Incurred by the insured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy and only to the extent herein described. (a) The €lability of the Company under this policy shall not exceed the least of: (i) the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A; or. (ii) the difference between the value of the insured estate or interest as insured and the value of the insured estate or interest subject to the defect, lien or encumbrance insured against by this policy. (b) In the event the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A at the hate of Policy is less than 80 percent of the value of the Insured estate or interest or the full consideration paid for the land, whichever is less, or if subsequent to the Date of Policy an improvement is erected on the land which increases the value of the Insured estate or interest by at least 20 percent over the Amount of Insurance staled in Schedule A. then this Policy is subject to the following: (i) where no subsequent improvement has been made, as to any partial loss, the Company shall only pay the loss pro rata in the proportion that the amount of insurance at Date of Policy bears to the total value of the insured estate or interest at Date of Policy; or (ii) where a subsequent improvement has been made, as to any partial loss, the Company shall onty pay the loss pro rata in the proportion that 120 percent of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A bears to the sum of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A and the amount expended for the improvement. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to costs, attorneys' ffles and expenses for which the Company is liable under this policy, and shall only applyto that portion of any loss which exceeds, in the aggregate, 10 percent of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A. (c) The Company will pay only those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in accordance with Section 4 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 8. APPORTIONMENT If the land described in Schedule A consists of two or more parcels which are not used as a single site, and a loss is established affecting ane or more of the parcels but not all, the loss shall be computed and settled on a pro rata basis as if the amount of insurance under this policy was divided pro rata as to the value on Date of Policy of each separate parcel to the whole, exclusive of any improvements made subsequent to Date of Policy, unless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to each parcel by the Comparry and the insured at the time of the issuance of this policy and shown by an express statement or by an endorsement attached to this policy. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the landr or cures the claim of unmarketability of title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby, (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shal l have no liability for loss or dam- age until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdio- tion, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the insured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY All payments underthis policy, except payments made for owls, attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance pro tanto. 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE It is expressly understood that the amount of insurance under this policy shall be reduced by any amount the Company may pay under any policy insuring a mortgage to which exception is taken In Schedule B or to which the insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which Is hereafter ex- ecuted by an insured and which is a charge or lien on the estate or interest described or referred to in Schedule A, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this policy to the Insured owner. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS (a) No payment shall be made without producing this policy for endorse- ment of the payment unless the policy has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. Reorder Fart, Na a?M (Rev. 10 -17 -SM (b) When liability an' extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with t :onditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within days thereafter. 13. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT (a) The Company's Right of Subrogation. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any. act of the insured claimant. . The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the insured claimant would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this policy not been issued. If requested by the Company, the insured claimant shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The insured claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in. the name of the insured claimant and to use the name of the insured claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the insured claimant, the Company shall be subrogated to these rights and reme- dies in the proportion which the Company's payment bears to the whole amount of the loss. If loss should result from any act of the insured claimant, as stated above, that act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, shall be required to pay only that part of any losses insured against by this policy which shall exceed the amount, if any, lost to the Company by reason of the impair- ment by the insured claimant of the Company's right of subrogation. (b) The Company's Rights Against Non-insured Obligors. The Company's right of subrogation against non -Insured obligors shall exist and shall include, without limitation, the rights of the insured to indem- nities, guaranties, other policies of insurance or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments which provide for subroga- tion rights by reason of this policy. 14. ARBITRATION Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the insured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connec- tion with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the insured. Alt arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the insured. Arbitra- tion pursuant to this policy and under the Rules in effect on the date the demand for arbitration is made or, at the option of the insured, the Rules in effect at Date of Policy shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land Is located permit a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered €n any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT (a) This policy together with all endorsements, ifany, attached hereto by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the Insured and the Com- pany. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest covered hereby or by any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this policy. (o) No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 16. SEVERABILITY In the event any provision of the policy is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provision and all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17. NOTICES, WHERE SENT All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall Include the number of this policy and shall be addressed to the Company at the issuing office or to: Chicago Tittle Insurance Company Claims Department 171 North Clark Street Chicago, Illinois 50601-3294 Form No. 1402.06 Policy Page 1 ALTA Owner's Policy (6-17-06) R Policy Number: NCS 472194 -SAI 1100302P050600 OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this policy must be given to the Company at the address shown in section 18 of the Conditions. COVERED RISKS SUaIECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation (the "Company"] insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 9 and 10, after Date of Policy, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason of: 1. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A. Z. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title. This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from (a) A defect in the Title caused by (i) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; (ii) failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; (iii) a document affecting Title not properly created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; (iv) failure to perform those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law; (v) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney; (vi) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (vii)a defective judicial or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid. (c) Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term "encroachment" includes encroachments of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. 4. No right of access to and from the Land. 5. The violation or enforcement of any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (b) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (c) the subdivision of land; or (d) environmental protection if a notice, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. 7. The exercise of the rights of eminent domain if a notice of the exercise, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, 8. Any taking by a governmental body that has occurred and is binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A or being defective (a) as a result of the avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of a transfer of all or any part of the title to or any interest in the Land occurring prior to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (b) because the instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown in Schedule A constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording in the Public Records (i) to be timely, or (ii) to impart notice of its existence to a purchaser for value or to a judgment or lien creditor. 10. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Tide or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses Incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions. First American Title insurance company wrrrsr ({�Vf/ sErx�rwwv �nto�► CAW 0n9 tivistQ� plan Form No. 1402.06 ALTA Owner's Policy (6-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or & 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as may be increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, increased by Section B(b), or decreased by Sections 10 and 11 of these Conditions. (b) "Date of Policy": The date designated as "Date of Policy" in Schedule A, (c) "Entity": A corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, or other similar legal entity, (d) "Insured": The Insured named in Schedule A. (i) The Germ "Insured" also includes (A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase, including heirs, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next of kin; (B) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, consolidation, distribution, or reorganization; (C) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another kind of Entity; (D) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered without payment of actual valuable consideration conveying the Tide (1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity interests of the grantee are wholly-owned by the named Insured, (2) if the grantee wholly owns the named Insured, (3) if the grantee is wholly-owned by an affiliated Entity of the named Insured, provided the affiliated Entity and the named Insured are both wholly-owned by the same person or Entity, or (4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written instrument established by the Insured named in Schedule A for estate planning purposes. Policy Page 2 Policy Number: NCS 472194 -SAL (ii) With regard to (A), (B), (C), and (D) reserving, however, all rights and defenses as to any successor that the Company would have had against any predecessor Insured. (e) "Insured Claimant": An Insured claiming loss or damage. (f) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge or notice that may be imputed to an Insured by reason of the Public Records or any other records that impart constructive notice of matters affecting the Title. (g) "Land": The land described in Schedule A, and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, tide, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. (h) "Mortgage": Mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (i) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. With respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Public Records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court for the district where the Land is located. (j) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. (k) "Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alleged or apparent matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or lender on the Title to be released from the obligation to purchase, lease, or lend if there is a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor of an Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by reason of warranties in any transfer or conveyance of the Title. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the Insured of either (i) an estate or interest in the Land, or (ii) an obligation secured try a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Conditions, (ii) in case Knowledge shall come to an Insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest that is adverse to the Title, as insured, and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if the Title, as insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title. if the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the Company's liability to the Insured Claimant under the policy shall be reduced to the extent of the prejudice. 4. PROOF OF LOSS In the event the Company is unable to determine the amount of loss or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition of payment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proof of loss. The proof of loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy that constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. S. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS (a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an Insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. This obligation is limited to only those stated causes of action alleging matters insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs, or expenses incurred by the Insured in the defense of those causes of action that allege matters not insured against by this policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the options contained in First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 1402.06 ALTA Owner's Policy (6-17-06) Section 7 of these Conditions, at its own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act that in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable to the Insured. The exercise of these rights shall not be an admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this subsection, it must do so diligently. (c) Whenever the Company brings an action or asserts a defense as required or permitted by this policy, the Company may pursue the litigation to a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and it expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal any adverse judgment or order. b. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE (a) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or proceeding, including the right to use, at its option, the name of the Insured for this purpose - Whenever requested by the Company, the Insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) in securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act that in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the Tide or any other matter as insured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to Furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. (b) The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and to produce for examination, inspection, and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by the authorized representative of the Company, all records, in whatever medium maintained, including books, ledgers, checks, memoranda, correspondence, reports, e-mails, disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Insured Claimant shall grant its permissions in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect, and copy all of these records in the custody or control of a third party that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Insured Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Insured Claimant to submit for examination under oathr produce any reasonably requested information, or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in this subsectionr unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. To pay or tender payment of the Amount of Insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' feesr and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay - Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability and obligations of the Company to the Insured under this policy, other than to make the payment required in this subsection, shall terminate, including .any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant. (1) To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against under this policy. In addition, the Company will pay any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obllgated to pay; or (ii) To pay or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, Policy Page 3 Policy Number: NCS 472144 -SAI attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in subsections (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the Insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. S. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy. (a) The extent of liability of the Company for loss or damage under this policy shall not exceed the lesser of (i) the Amount of Insurance; or (ii) the difference between the value of the Title as insured and the value of the Title subject to the risk insured against by this policy. (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Titler as insured, (1) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and (ii) the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the loss or damage determined either as of the date the claim was made by the Insured Claimant or as of the date it is settled and paid. (c) In addition to the extent of liability under (a) and (b), the Company will also pay those costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 of these Conditions. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY (a) If the Company establishes the Tide, or removes the alleged defect, lien, or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the Land, or cures the claim of Unmarketable Tider all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to the Insured. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured - (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses, shall reduce the Amount of Insurance by the amount of the payment. it. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount the Company pays under any policy insuring a Mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the Insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is executed by an Insured after Date of Policy and which is a charge or lien on the Title, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment to the Insured under this policy. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS When liability and the extent of loss or damage have been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shall be made within 30 days. 13. RIGHTS OF RECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT (a) Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the rights of the Insured Claimant in the Title and all other rights and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant has against any person or property, to the extent of the amount of any lossr costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the Company. If requested by the Company, the Insured Claimant shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Company of these rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle in the name of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights and remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Insured Claimant, the Company shall defer the exercise of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have recovered its loss. First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 1402.06 ALTA Owner's Policy (6-17-06) Policy Page 4 Policy Number: NCS 472194 -SAI (b) The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the Insured to (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a part of this indemnitlesr guaranties, other policies of insurance, or bonds, policy and is subject to all of its terms and provisions. Except as the notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments endorsement expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and that address subrogation rights. provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsement, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. 14. ARBITRATION Either the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association ("Rules"). Except as provided in the Rules, there shall be no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other persons. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision, or to any other controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to this policy. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of $2,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon the parties. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached to it by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the Insured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage that arises out of the status of the Title or by 1.6. SEVERABILITY In the event any provision of this policy, in whole or in part, is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provision or such part held to be invalid, but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM (a) Choice of Law: The Ensured acknowledges the Company has underwritten the risks covered by this policy and determined the premium charged therefore in reliance upon the law affecting interests in real property and applicable to' the interpretation, rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity of claims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither ease shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles to determine the applicable law. (b) Choice of Forum: Any litigation or other proceeding brought by the Insured against the Company must be filed only in a state or federal court within the United States of America or its territories having appropriate jurisdiction. any action asserting such claim shall be restricted to this policy. 16. NOTICES, WHERE SENT (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in writing and Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be authenticated by an authorized person, or expressly incorporated by given to the Company under this policy must be given to the Company at 1 First Schedule A of this policy. American Way, Santa Ana, CA 92707, Attn: Claims Department. POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AM R1 First Amerlcan Tltle insurance Company Form No. 1402.06 ALTA Owner's Policy (6-17-06) SCHEDULE A First American Title Insurance Company Name and Address of the issuing Title Insurance Company: First American Title Insurance Company 5 First American Way Santa Ana, CA 92707 File No.: NCS-472194-SAl Policy Page 5 Policy Number: NCS 472194 -SAI Policy No.: NCS 472194-SAl Address Reference: 508 South 3rd Street, Renton, WA 98055 Amount of Insurance: $525,000.00 Premium: $2,041.00 Date of Policy: June 14, 2011 at 8:00am 1 2. Name of Insured: The City of Renton, Washington, a Washington Municipal Corporation The estate or interest in the Land that is insured by this policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title is vested in: The City of Renton, Washington, a Washington Municipal Corporation 4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: LOTS 3, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 6, SMITHER'S SIXTH ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 26 OF PLATS, PAGE 47, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. APN:784180-0195-06 and 784180-0205-04 First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 1402.06 ALTA Owner's Policy (6-17-06) 1A fa ► Can Z zzYm SCHEDULE B Policy Page 6 Policy Number: NCS 472194-5A1 Policy No.: NCS 472194-SA1 EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This Policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. Taxes and assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes of assessments on real property or by the public record. 2. (A) Unpatented mining claims; (B) Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (C) Water rights,. claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (A), (B) or (C) are shown by the public records; (D) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. 3. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. 4. This item has been intentionally deleted. 5. This item has been intentionally deleted. 6. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions, if any, as contained and/or delineated on the face of the plat of Smither's Sixth Addition to the Town of Renton recorded in Volume 26 of Plats at Page 47, in King County, Washington. 7. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "City of Seattle - Water Department Permit Agreement" recorded May 22, 1981 as Recording No. 8105220772 of Official Records. 8. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "City of Seattle - Water Department Permit Agreement" recorded April 29, 1983 as Recording No. 8304290954 of Official Records. Assignment of Permit Agreement to Thrift Realty Company, a California corporation recorded October 26, 1984 under King County Recording No. 8410261119 9. Conditions, notes, easements, provisions contained and/or delineated on the face of the Survey recorded July 7, 1999 under Recording No. 19990707900018, in King County, Washington. 10. The following matters disclosed by an ALTA/AGSM survey made by Pace on May 10, 2011, designated Job No. 11384.10: 1. Structure encroaches on sanitary sewer line along northern portion of property. 2. Southerly portion of structure encroaches across southerly property line. 3. Concrete roof footing encroaches across southerly property line. 11. General Taxes for the year 2011. First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 1402.06 ALTA Owner's Policy (6-17-06) Tax Account No.: 784180-0195-06 Amount Billed: $ 13,936.91 Amount Paid: $ 6,968.46 Amount Due: $ 6,968.45 Assessed Land Value: $ 439,200.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 700,900.00 (Affects Lots 3 and 4) 12. General Taxes for the year 2011. Tax Account No.: 784180-0205-04 Amount Billed: $ 2,700.31 Amount Paid: $ 1,350.16 Amount Due: $ 1,350.15 Assessed Land Value: $ 219,100.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 1,000.00 (Affects Lot 5) First American Tide Insurance Company Policy Page 7 Policy Number: NCS 472194 -SAI Farm No. 1402.06 Policy Page 8 ALTA Owner's Policy (6-17-06) Policy Number; NCS 472194 -SAI First American Title Insurance Company Printed: 03-27-2012 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA12-022 Payment Made: 03/27/2012 12:20 PM Total Payment: 5,253,00 Current Payment Made to the Following Items; City of Renton Planning Division 97 RED EIC"E l V EBJ Receipt Number: R1201321 Payee: KING COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM Trans Account Code Description Amount ---------------- ------ 3060 ------------------ 503.000000.004.322 ------------------------------ Technology Fee 153.00 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers 100.00 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees 2,000.00 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review 1,000.00 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval 2,000.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ---------- ---------- --------------------------- --------------- Payment Check 3020184 5,253.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ------ 3021 ------------------ 303.000000.020.345 ------------------------------- Park Mitigation Fee --------------- .00 3080 503.000000.004.322 Technology Fee .00 3954 650.000000.000.237 Special Deposits .00 5006 000.000000.007.345 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.000000.011.345 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.000000.007.345 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Use Fees 00 5010 000.000000.007.345 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.000000.007.345 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.000000.007.345 Final Plat .00 5013 000.000000.007.345 PUD .00 5014 000.000000.007.345 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.000000.007.345 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.000000.007.345 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.000000.007.345 Rezone .00 5018 000.000000.007.345 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.000000.007.345 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.000000.007.345 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.000000.007.345 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence .00 5022 000.000000.007.345 Variance Fees .00 5024 000.000000.007.345 Conditional Approval Fee -00 5036 000.000000.007.345 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.000000.002.341 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.000000.007.341 Maps (Taxable) 5998 000.000000.000.231 Ta Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 00 00