Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1(lo~/
LAND USE HEARING SIGN-IN SHEET . V~1'f
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat/LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP JJ-
March 24 2015, 11:00 AM
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY
ADDRESS Phone# with area code Email
NAME (including City & Zip} (optional} (optional}
/I ·----IS oo 6' s~ /J'j J°I -de Co,<,. N',ff.
/1 (} /v1 G rc:. r ,~ µ,r=-!ll_ Q ..q ..,+c, ,->'3 01 re;' ca.r /<? A/.1---r-
'-5 +e u 8 l/ L y !Yl A,u I if c; o s -I(:; fl I-vi A v e 5 E 9'ftJS-f -5.J.-e 1..1 e c! h;';/ '1 C.O vi-d-r '(
,,.....-i +ra r {..oRJ • CIJ/111
. KA_0111JJ\; J in,vG 0-io 1nt 7'w kV~J_/J\_A_J q~ ~--MM'@ ,1v(~~A Q 'uM--
,, 13-0 /f!k7c /n r /'-/'f23 f6o7bl !lvL0 5t:~ rt C);:,, r ;<01Y,31(r ;Ue-rc~~
@ C= ,+s,-. /v6.r
.
.
'
:, I!!!' iii!
Ill !
111·· !!!!iii !11 ' ii !!!!Ill
xxxx-xxx ,U:13SclnN 3Nldl'V
i .
' I
' I mlml mill!
_J
'1::-
1
I
i
I
I
I=
~
d z
§
~
~
!
t:56 f ,_~ i ~w
00'
~J !
~ @,IY
I ~!I • •.1
I
rf 1 ·r
I
•
'
z
~
oz .... .;; = z~ "' 11,1 ~
"<!' QI! ' -.... ~
z 0~
<[ ~: -, _,
0
ld.i ~·-··,.:, :'
_._.-. .. I~ i.
)..~3S~nN 3Nldl\f
!
•
I
'
ii
.. -, ,--
I __
·=..--i ..
~
" z %
1~ g~
g~ z~ "' -~ ICIII o ...... oi :z
<t ~, -,
()
l
I
X
X
X
X
* X
X
! 1;;
' i!i I ~ z
w z
~
TREE R8£NT100 CALCUI.A 7/0NS
,.,,. ........... .......,, --
i'"~i~~ t ====!.,~=g ..... ,.. .... _ __. ,...,..,.,u __
.......,,_,_,.-,,o
r;};"'•oJ)-""·'
NE 1/4 SECnON 23, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.
ALPINE NURSERY 1ESC L£G£Nl) ~~:,..:-==-
XX-··-
@)Q-···-__ ,,,,.,,.__,, ..... --·-~
. I ·, I
,\-C,-;c---J,\"-:-~.,,_ J ) L
I
J
I
I
I I
)~ I .• / .
-' I'
I
__j
I
I · .. ,;,· .''
__j • '' i ;·]! ·~ I.~
' ; . I· ~I,
,, I•
/
•, '
'
)
~!, .. ,
-E
-
~
Cllllll'llnqO.-.,lDIIDII
8H
I ,.,, .. :-----. ......._ I ~ ./ . ·-·--.. ·---.:.:...:. __ _
• I'
. .,y:x)
'~ ',
,•
::J! l ~'~~+ :-.;-:5::: -;:::j
.... ...... ~-~ CITY OF
RENTON
-_-:=-..-:--
:-:;:.:.-
'
/
/
@
NORTH
L..2'. 0,CH ~., ST ___ ...... Ill [D) R§ II;~-= I~. -w I.::.,.;__'; I 1i __,....,a .. ,.;..,;""""' """' --~ -II'( I !11,T[ I APPR 1--i..i
JAN 14 2015
CITY OF RENTON
Pl..tJftllWG DIVJSION
I() ~, ~~!~~~~ ~~!~~~~-~~;~!~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~!?~~!! !~~ ~,~ ~~~~~~,!-~-~ ~~~~~~~ i~~t,i~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~!,
~::,._ !ii iii !!! l!l!a.!'!i!!!!i I!!!!! i i!!!!!i!!! o!!!!!l !!a !!! !!!!'!!!!!!! iiii!!i !I !!l!i!ll!!i
~!l::
.,~
l;l9::
i;:5.R-t-t+t.t-+tt-l++t++H-++++++-+++++++tt-t+++++H-++++++-+++++++tt-t+++t+H+++++H-++++++1-+H++++tt-1+++++-H-++++++.i
;~~
e~
~
~~ 1•ii!illilll,,iiiiii,illlill 111111
~
~
~
111-;1,•1,iiiii'iil ililiiil !ii iii !lilill! !!liiiillill!ii'iiliiillllli lliiilllil!l,,;,;;1 Ii! i!!!
•: illiill !!!,,,,,,,!!.!!!!,.! ilil!il !iloi!I i!i!i!!l-iili!i Iii iii illi!llllil iiil!il!!i.!!! ''
xxxx-xxx ,U:13S~nN 3NldlV
~~ w~
~ ~ -~ ~-2<
w~ b 2~ -~ ~w
<[ w > -w
0
~ 02 ..
>-z ,!!
~w I uoc
~1
i ~ ~
I ~ii • i
1" Nf
!
!
•
I
;
~
d z 2
I :£2 if ~;:3 ii '<I' ,...,
z
<t: -,
0
xxxx-xxx
\ \{, _\
I t I
\\
\'
. ' I .
J'
~._../· .
___j
AM3S~nN 3NldlV
-m=
I
I
/
/
/
\
\
\
:s-~:~;~;·{t!f(!iiCJ:~\;4.
-~-
' •
I
:z
<( --,
I
I
!
X
X
X
X
I
X
X
X
" >-l "'
' IX I ~ z
uJ z
~ <
NE 1/4 SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 E. W.1.1.
ALPINE NURSERY
j: '' i .J i ;,I
·1,'· .• /;
--i ::iii.
.i' ·;:-.. ·_,_: ~-j. :, I ·/f
-I "
II ; 1fi l,...r
-----l I I
ie,~:---.-J I [ :-.~ I
• . i~...._ I I I l'J§ l
&... ~--1 ) :,~ ~~ ·-,.,. . :-·--:-:-· >< :1
:? ??!SJ
i :i~_·.·
I •11!' i '~/:i
i ; 1'1·: . 0 I • 1:._'_,,_1_·.'. fir --h .,. s k,, . .,.
'.",,/(iii ti +-·-:·"'r
!";:;"-
. "-.,
~
aa•"tlon:tllflllll-.'IIIIIDIII
--.!!1----~ -~ OR.STRONG lll[)RSH~~7-,., ·-
I -~~l~J
-,;::::::.~ ... • -. ·• .• .• -~ ~
.oa.-.-
... ~-® .....,..,,
-= 11'1" I DOTE 1-l.::,~I
_,..
......._
~ '"~.:..Ci'-f<~":'-
1 I "· ·
. 11 ~\ .. '.' --JI \ \ ~
i---'l,·. \l
I i I . ,. I " ___ ; ___ ii, 1· __ 1
" I , [ " I · t . ·.
Y-'l__~! L. . ----,.,,,,,,_ =--f I ,,,_.....,,___,,,,---rl ! r
iHII'.. I I ._,,::fl,':' I I I ' I ,?..,.,....... I
_:· --_,_[_ -" -,L: t !1
• • .,.. ~ ('l • i -.' ii
@
!!Flf[o/;,.,S;~ NORTH
~ CITY OF
~ RENTON
Plo"r,i"9/B,;ldir'9/Pc0olle-
,,.....,,.., . ..,..,.,,,,,,,,,_.,., ,,.... .......... -.,.._,,.,.,.,,.CF
.,..,. ... --_,a,, -....... <F
~~~~AJ!.-~W_,... 11..,..,
A.LPINE NURSERY
PRELIMINARY PLAT
ECEI~"""
DRS PRO,ECT NO. 14069
JAN 14 2015
CITY OF RENTON
PIANNING DIVISION
'--z.J
• i,eHaSOFT
\' ---.L .... !.!, '
/,/~~::--. _T··.· ~~..,b,r-~-:~-=
/ . .,,,--r-.... _ ,,·-~ ·---:---.
/, /. -,,--' I ·1·'hel · : •: ::---, / I r.: ---/. I -/ I I i ~i !:
/ ' · / I I -!. ~~ . -1 '
i /.r ---_J_ --s --. I --~
·/:---I ( J-I, I ~ . . .
--'"'_··! • /, :\ / I >--( ' '"'\ . •· ., . I / ... , ,; __ ,,,. I / \
''t),., I I \
\-. . .,, -.• , -. I'\ '
\:
' '
xxxx-xxx ,U:l3S~nN 3Nldl'v
. ·-(' /
I
I
-·F--
I
I
I
I
I
J=-
!
•
I
•
11111 .~ I !I ·11. ·
I
I
I
!
I ~, f l
'1 I 11 ii ,~11
i I
u-,
= <-..J
"" .....
:z:
<( -,
z oz ... Q z ..
Ll,j ii: a.: 0
u.. (!) ol
~z
0~
l
' 11 ' •
' . ~ . '
r)
'
..
. ' ' I ·, -·~
' --·
'
'i 11 I;
! ii! II!
,t 11 I 1if ~
• ; -1111
1· Ill
I
;: J ., -
• ! ·,1 i .
;
H
ii
' '
•o;o~:,oo3
xxxx-xxx
' ,
I
i . '! ~ ~
• i
>10'~"'"'°'
!
I
I
' I
' ~ !
' I ' '! • ' !
(
•
I
!
i~
• 'I
• '..··ci ;
I • r 11 !!1
~; 111
a, I • ' •
......... ~·-·----·1-,1,1-,~----
z oz
I-0 z !!i
LU :!: D:: C ... ~
Oz
~z
0~
i
I
i
g
X
I
X
X
X
I ~
' 1/J I ~ z
w z
~
NE 1/4 SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 2J N, RANG£ 5 E. W.M.
ALPINE NURSERY
-il' i•'( t l
u, u ---:-t~:--------·-------------------··--------··--·--····-·1··--·
-
1 l l l l l l l sr .. ~r l ~ l l ~ l l . I --·-----..... -ORAPHCSO\l.E
~ ,,,o, • .,,--.
>iC+<ILlJNfAL
•
;! I p 111 J!! ~--------------...... _____________ ::.".-------------~ • ,~
~
1 l::f~~;,&~·
~-' ·---II
H11 II, ------------·--·-'----..................... -
-
·,. i -·-; ,.,._ _________ _
~
-
I . l l l l l l ~ l l l l ~ l 'JTAl SE l ~ l ~ ~ l l ~ l l l l jj -I ---------------
~ D.R.STRON(J ....,.,. -A$ Nl7l[tl ..-.-=w-. !lm CITY OF • L ALPINE NURSERY e
~=.:';:';:' "" ·-. "" --= ,,..-=.:;.,_, ® .. ~ .. !~T.IE~EIVEfr"•~LAT ~
DRS PRD.£CT NO. 14069 IAHNININI JAN 14 2015
CITY OF RENTON
PIANNING DIVISION
,,__.,.'
.,..,.,. ... --......
M tii-.iii Of's«'U •DI.M•-==
xxxx-xxx
/
4
)
I
!
I
'
'
\ .\
\
\
/
i
I
' I
\
1
I
I
A~3s~nN 3NldlV
-L'lll'OHd
l
I
g
i~
Ii~ ..... -z
<t --,
I
I
!
X
X
X
X
I
X
X
X
I ~
' w " ,n
i "' . ::, z
w z
~
Jf1
"""'lWW*"Vtlo!'I-YmDlil
--!!1--IDJ!f.l_D.QI\WI\)
N£ 1/4 S£Cll0N 23, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANG£ 5 £, W.M.
ALPINE NURSERY
:::.::::·.:. :::.:::·:;;. :::::::-~ -----,.,. .... -.. --·-· ,. ...... -.. .............. ,., ... ....-.-n IAal>'••" ..,. • ....., ..... uo ..... -uo IA••--= -~-': Q:,;,.-: ":.:f:: • l . ·--
-----------,, _ +~~ !! ) ff i;_,r~ \~~---· 1itj:
'--,. , ... .--~. -----·1·· ~ ... / . ~ . :!!
b "... • . -----~ --,_ -----~ . ----;~/ 11
!h . 'i
Edd : f -
'
I , , ~ , + , + , , + 1 fAD l , , , , , + , , , ! ,1 -------------
11 [)) ROO) ':!'.:==: o-.-F--INO -
O""P'°CSCAIF " .
1~~~,7·
11NCH•0Ff. ==
--,. ..._ ......
IJY IIIATtl.,.,...r:""'-".!!!!.
q-~ li,~I
:Un CITY OF
~ RENTON
"""'""9/U""d'"o/"""'~ w,
ALPINE NURSERY
PREUl.ilNARY PU. T
IIOAll Pl'Of'LE
EIVED
DRS PRO.ECT NO. 14069
JAN 14 2015
CITY OF RENTON
PIANNING DIVISION
l
' l • ! >
.l! .l! :t :t :t :t :t .l! l OOOOOOQQ l l ~~~~r:;~.;~
ti :; :; t:; t 1111 { • • HHHH ' ~ l ~ J • 1 HlHHl • • • ~:<":::!::'!;;'~,., ! j l • k 1
1Jl11ll1-e1J-e1J > J = ~~~~~~~~ I l l ~ :n: :r 3: 3: 3: ~ 3:
' I I
.... ~~..-..-..-.!::!!Q 8 k ' 1 ~ .! -I I ] { 'j_
f ' I p ' l] l • l
~I ~ Ifl:t~ •1 j l i Jl,I ~d jj ]
I:'-! I "-' o-1 ~ , " § . p ,'l t~ I -I l -· p trn ~ ~ j 1, H ~ I l.it! f 1i; J IS: l] .hlt1n1 !1 l i ' ~i HU~ ijJ]l~ ul •
-----,
' :_:I
' }
~ i
' £ ,
;;: c ~ f :~
I ~~ n
--,
z oz .... Q
z~
U,I 0
Qi~
.... i!i! Oz
~~
-0. ()
' C
17
1!{
·········15
1
(
' ' '
,,,/
2t/ ..
2
N·•J'l!, U~j
~~
' I hi
N
' ----"
1~
I
T
't ,,,
= = ~
I~
22 1 il±
1:=
I~
~
I~ t""-------:1 ~
I
\.~3 J ·. ·-.. I
I
z oz 1-i z-w :!: Di: Q
... (j oi
~~ -... 0
.... ; ~/---
\
'
ii,,',,,
"' /' "''
---~---/v\AfCHl,INf • :ff 5ffff !/4
~1--,
..... -
blU l l ::::::--1~·''/,VT!--l/..'CCOf'C~J:ffCI'
... I. I
·::1/.\ I ::.;...:-c;,~.nm .. ~rrr.-:~H;ur.x,,.-;:•:
CT 01 Mll',·~•".fNfl. ~,
'l"·.Y'rw··. to.I' r.~11"1/ITt,::-1111
01,~,s.-; r·•· ,..-:re· -l'.11,
~·~--~ ~
GRIARWOOC
4 VOL. 91,
NO. 6
'!'W'I'{' .. C,(-'I' ,-lllt'lf"IYII!
'h "/,~ <.T'''i·[ ';."~( ..:10
,_n r:u,-. 1r•Y!i r-..•· ,, _ ,s •I\'!:-~'
''[UlH,ft.r-'lll'
BRIAR
5 VOL.
'
I
l1.
~Ill ~
"';
;,
~
~ a:>~ ... .._e<;N
~{:\ s-:
\ ~1'fr. i 'i\, ~
> : J-lj-& . ' "' -, ~ ~
i~J
~t >"--' '-ii ~i'•s ~\> ,:.f
. i~ ~?\~,-{
~~t!"~/t1 ,-,:..;;._,,,,.,(,_...rJ';-
?;;;
tr'i
"" = z
"-' 2
"-
""'
,·;..
~
~
"' ~
G s
' ~ \.!"•
,\\
~i
~
'i--
"
"'-,,_,,,_,. ·-l-5
':+C:l'.?of 4
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
't"L'U.· ~~~I :
f,i~j tltW':'~'\";~itf~:;'~j;J)*, _·_·"_"'·_.,_,~_r_',~,;;::;;7:d'"'"'n°'1
~;,·-::;
1;;::-N"l:T'3~,;:x;-.·d_\/_-11_1I i:; ! ~
C Ln w = > "' a -..... a w a -w u 0 :z: 0
~i w <ct
ai:: --, z,
~i
m
0 • I a
z oz ... Q z !!? ... 2: c.= C
.... " 0~
~~
-0. 0
i
I
I
!
!
!
' !
~
~
~I w
"' " => z
w z a:
~
"
~
C.!WottqO.,,,-.'f<IIIDlg
811 ------~
I I \ \ \ ~ __.-;e1
~
• ' I
' !
m!E)'=~ -'J"=:..-=:..:..-I HO.
Nf: 1/4 SECTION 2:J, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.
ALPINE NURSERY
~ ~fl' Sfllfff
-,_,n ~·=
I I
f-_J:J U~~I I I ~ r 5d 10r----frn ~~crj 'c_, ~ )J,: I
--LT~) ... _\ I I I L ____ ___
• ' 1
'
'§3• i ' • 1
' ' ~ ~ NOTE:: ~w.,,:.~~~=:.'"'
~ ~--~
:.:: It.,;_,;_ I -£IY 10,l,TEj<Pmj--r...
!
ED
ALPINE I\IURSERY
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NE~IIORHOOO DETAllw.P
DRS PROJECT NO. 14039
JAN 14 2015
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
@
NORTH
QR~'e<CS<,\LE
C ,c,:, >o:l --
DEPARTMENT OF co .... .lUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
-----=-=~---------Renton®
ADMINISTRATIVE STREET MODIFICATION
~APPROVAL D DENIAL
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT MANAGER:
APPLICANT:
ZONING CLASSIFICATION:
PROJECT LOCATION:
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
EVALUATION FORM & DECISION
Alpine Nursery
LUAlS-000018, MOD
Ann Fowler, Civil Engineer II
Roy Boyer
14609-161" Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
Residential Low Density (RLD)
16023 SE 144th St/14625 161" Ave SE
Pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D the applicant is requesting an Administrative Modification from
RMC 4-6-060 Street Standards for the following:
1. 160'h Avenue SE street cross section, south of SE 145'h Place, in order to realign the
extension of 160'h Avenue SE to the west.
2. SE 1451h Place right-of-way reduction from 53 feet to 47 feet.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant has received preliminary plat approval for a 27 lot subdivision with three tracts
for open space, tree retention, and drainage. The subject property is a collection of three
parcels located on the south side of SE 144th St between 160th Ave SE and 161st Ave SE. The
resulting 9.64-acre site is located within the Residential-4 dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning
classification. The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes
would range from 8,000 square feet to 13,369 square feet. Access to the plat is proposed via an
extension of 161st Ave SE and 160th Ave SE. Internal circulation terminates in a cul-de-sac in
the northern portion of the property. The southern portion of the site contains grid
connections from 160th to 161st Ave SE aligned with SE 145th St and SE 146th Place.
On April 6, 2015 the City's Hearing Examiner issued an approval of the Alpine Nursery
Preliminary Plat subject to 15 conditions of approval. Specifically related to street standards
Conditions #11 and #12 state:
Condition 11: A street modification shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current
Planning Project Monoger prior to engineering permit approval for a
City of Renton Department of Cai ity and Economic Development Admin. dification Request Report & Decision
ALPINE NURSERY -STREET MODIFICATION LUAlS-000018, MDD
Report of November 3, 2015 Page 2 of 4
modification of the 160th Ave SE street cross section, south of Road 'A', in order
to realign the extension of 160th Ave SE to the west.
Condition 12: A street modification shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current
Planning Project Manager, prior to engineering permit approval, for a
modification to reduce the required right-of-way width of Road 'A' from 53 feet
to 47 feet.
1601h Ave SE (Condition #111
RMC 4-6-060 requires the extension of 160th Ave SE to include 20 feet of pavement width to
the face of the curb, 0.5-foot curb, 8-foot wide landscape planter, and a 5-foot wide sidewalk
along the east side of the street. The original plan included an extension of the 160th Ave SE to
the southern property line in the event of future platting to the south property line. However,
the existing subdivision abutting the subject property to the south was constructed in the
1980's and is therefore not likely to be redeveloped in the near future. There is however,
property immediately to the southwest which has potential to redevelop. As a result, staffs
preliminary comments recommended 160th Ave SE be realigned in manner that would allow
for the extension of 160th Ave SE to SE 148th St and not require dedications from the existing
subdivision abutting the property to the south. The revised plat plan, submitted by the
applicant includes a taper/realignment of 160th Ave SE to eliminate the need for the
dedications from the properties abutting to the south (Exhibit 1).
It was noted to the Hearing Examiner that City Staff would be supportive of a modification to
the standards to the extent a pedestrian connection is provided from 160th Ave SE to 161st Ave
SE along the southern portion boundary of the site as well as the revised design being a more
desirable alignment to the City. The applicant has provided the pedestrian connection noted by
Staff as well as provided a more desirable alignment to the City.
SE 1451h Place formally Road 'A' (Condition #12)
RMC 4-6-060 requires a right-of-way width for residential access streets of 53 feet, to allow for
26 feet of pavement, 5-foot wide sidewalks, 8,foot wide landscape planter strips, and 0.5-foot
curbs on both side of the street. The original plat plan included an internal road network in
compliance with RMC 4-6-060. However, in response to preliminary comments from City Staff
related to lot orientation and the alignment of the extension of 160th Ave SE, the applicant
submitted a revised plat plan to the City similar to Exhibit 1. The plan maintains the 53-foot
cross section for the current Road 'A' (originally Road 'B'). However SE 1451h Place was reduced
to a 47-foot wide cross section (20 feet of pavement width to the face of the curb, 0.5 foot
curbs, 8-foot wide landscape planters, and 5-foot wide sidewalks along the both sides of the
street). Additionally, a 21-foot wide public alley/unnamed road has been incorporated into the
design to provide rear access to proposed Lots 17-20.
It was noted to the Hearing Examiner that City Staff would be supportive of a reduction in the
right-of-way width of SE 1451h Place from 53 feet to 47 feet to the extent it allows for rear
access via the public alley to proposed Lots 17-20 and the elimination of curb cuts needed on SE
144th St. The applicant has provided the alley access to Lots 17-20 as noted by Staff.
City of Renton Department of Cor . ity and Economic Development
ALPINE NURSERY -STREET MOD/FICA TION
Admin. ification Request Report & Decision
LUAlS-000018, MOD
Report of November 3, 2015 Page 3 of 4
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit 1: Site Plan
ANALYSIS OF REQUEST:
The Section 4-6-0GOQ.1 allows the Administrator to grant modifications provided the
modifications meet the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D.2):
Criteria
a. Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design
Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment
necessary ta implement these policies and objectives.
Staff Comment:
The Community Design Element has applicable policies listed under a separate
section labeled Streets, Sidewalks and Streetscapes. These policies address
walkable neighborhoods, safety and shared uses. Two specific policies support
the decision to modify the street standards in order to realign 160'h Ave SE as
well as reduce the right-of-way on SE 145th Place. These policies are Policy CD-
102 and Policy CD-103 which state that the goal is to promote new
development with "walkable places," "support grid and flexible grid street and
pathway patterns," and "are visually attractive, safe, and healthy
environments." The requested street modifications are consistent with these
policy guidelines.
b. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental
protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements, based
upon sound engineering judgment; and
Staff Comment:
The modified street improvements will meet the objectives of a safe walkable
environment. The improvements provide for a walkable path between 160'h
Ave SE and 161 st Ave SE within Tract C along the east portion of the project
which provide pedestrian connectivity. The reduction in right-of-way width in
SE 145th Place allows for alley access to Lots 17-20 separating pedestrians from
vehicular traffic along SE 144th Street.
c. Will not be injurious to other property(ies) in the vicinity; and
Staff Comment:
The improvements will provide an upgrade to current conditions. The new
improvements will meet the standards for safe vehicular and pedestrian use
Criteria Met
X
X
X
City of Renton Department of Co1 1ity and Economic Development Admin. dification Request Report & Decision
ALPINE NURSERY -STREET MODIFICATION WAlS-000018, MOO
Report of November 3, 2015 Page4of4
within the existing and proposed roadways.
d. Conform to the intent ond purpose of the Code; ond
Staff Comment: X
This modification provides a safe pedestrian route in and around the proposed
neighborhood.
e. Can be shown to be justified ond required for the use and situation
intended; and
Staff Comment: X
The revised street standards provide a safe design for vehicles and
pedestrians, and will enhance the attractiveness of the new development.
f. Will not create adverse impacts to other property(ies) in the vicinity; and
Staff Comment:
There are no identified adverse impacts from this modification of the 160'h X
Ave SE street cross section and realignment or the reduction in the SE 145th
Place right-of-way width.
DECISION
The proposal satisfies 6 of the 6 criteria listed in RMC 4-9-250D.2 for the requested
modification if all conditions of approval are met. Therefore, the street modifications of the
Alpine Nursery project, Project Number LUA15-000018, MOD are approved and subject to the
following condition of approval:
1. A pedestrian connection is provided from 160th Ave SE to 161st Ave SE along the
southern portion boundary of the site. The connection shall be 5' wide soft surface trail
that is constructed in a manner that disturbs as little existing vegetation as reasonably
possible.
hA~Dal\~, I t / I
'Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Manager Date
The decision to approve the modification(s) will become final if not appealed in writing together
with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,
WA 98057 on or before 5:00 pm, on November 17, 2015. Additional information regarding the
appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's office, Renton City Hall -7'h Floor,
(425) 430-6510.
If you have any further questions regarding this decision, feel free to contact the project
manager, Ann Fowler, at 425.430.7382 or afowler@rentonwa.gov.
\ --
\
\
\
I )
-·L·-·--·
·-·-r·-·-..\
I \
I \ \\
I \ ~
I I \
I
I )
-·-1·-·-·--·
-·-·-T-·-·---..
r----------;
l l
I I
I I
I O> I
I I
\ I L---------..J
r---"""]
l I
L <:, I
l -I l I
I I
\ i L_ _______ ..J
r-------,
I l
""\ -!
I -I l I
I \
I J IL---::,
--I C
I
I
\~
I \_ ___ _
I
l
I
I
I
'
----1
I /
b
,---......
I '
I ',
: ~ '1
i I
I I
I l
L.-------J
r-------,
l I
L :
l ~ I I I
I i
\ I ,._ ______ .J
,------1
I I
\ I
• I I ..,. ~ :
i1t _____ )
I \
I \
' I I I
I "> I
\-I
l I
I I
I I L. ____ .J
I )
I _J
r----1
I I
I I
I I ,..,. l
1-I
I I
I I
/ I L _____ J
--------------------
;
r------i
I I
I I
I ,-._ l
I -I I I
I i
I I
I I L _______ ...J
r---------,
I I
l I
I I
I ~ I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
L---------...J
r---------1
l I
I I
I I
I I
I ~ I
I I
i I
I I
l I L _________ J
,
'
' r---------,
"" ..... , ' \ ! ~ I I
,t-\ \ I
I \Q) I
I I I I
I I i . I I I
J !_ ____ J
., ,
' I
l
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
L
L
I
I
L
\ I
'
'
.,.,,..------1
( ' I "-I I I
I i
l l l-------.J r-------;
I I
I I
I •-i I ~ I
l I
I I ~------...J
r-------,
I I
I I
I I
l l() I
I I
I I
l------.J
r---------1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I S) I
I "< I
I I
I I
I I L _________ J
-,
I
I
I
V '•"' • ,,. -
I .LSHl.#J.38
I
I
I "tj
! \-
! ~
I --, r :S:.
/ I~
I I
I
I
L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_J
1-
1
I
I
I
I
~
!L
I
i
I
I
I I._._
I
Bernie Wagar
14726 160th Pl SE
Renton, WA 98059
-
.,J15 PM 5 L
If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this
form and return to: City of Renton 1 CEO -Planning Division 1 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
RECEIVEDName/file No.: Alpine, Nursery Preliminary Plat /LUA15-000018, ECF, PP r,.!} .t\ [ ,c;(l~
APR 1 5 2015 NAME:~ ~~ -
1
MAILING ADDRESS: 2 D Pl ,s::£ City/State/Zip: /2t,n~ tJ) 11
CITY OF RENT01IJ.EPHONE NO.: 12 ,r ~ z z,,;. ~112 R f<;?o,1'1'
PLANNING DIVISION
11 , j,i 1, i .. I, j ii, jp j i I i I i l in n1 ij, i, i, 11 11 ,ii',, 1, i j 1,, ii, ji I ij
Phil Olbrechts Hearing Examiner
Roy and Kim Boyer Contact
Kim Smith Owner
William and Mary Spiry Owner
Parties of Record See Attached
(Signature of Sender):
STATE OF WASHINGTON
''""'
1111
11, ,, lr ,,' 0\..L y P ,,,
COUNTY OF KING $ ~ ''''''"\''''' O"i:.111 .= ~~,._,,s,0+1,,111 ~ ~ = # "o ¥,0 r..,. ~+\. 1,:)
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante 3 ei, f , ~ 1% (f)
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act tot§:~ \se~nd J)urJ:&ljes
mentioned in the instrument. ~ i ~~~<'g•L,c. f . 1 a·.,,,., -17 ........ ~.
111 ,.. ,..!'h\\\''''"" ~o ~,·
Dated: 1111 .,._.SHING ,,.::
Notary (Print): ___ ---'-l+,,_4,-'i-( "l='--f._.ew .. .=....?6-...------------
My appointment expires: U .Aicrvd ;)_ ~ Jo ( :C,.
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
template -affidavit of service by mailing
Rav and Kim Baver
14609 161st Ave SE
Renton. WA 98059
Maher Joudi
D.R. Strong Consulting Eng.
620 7th Ave
Kirkland, WA 98033
Kim Smith
14609 161st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Steve Lyman
14505 160th Ave SE
Renton. WA 98059
Tim & Linda Corner
14611160th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
William and Marv Soirv
16023 SE 144th St
Renton. WA 98059
ROGER PAULSEN
6617 SE 5th Pl
Renton. WA 98059
Denis Law
Mayor
April 9, 2015
Roy & Kim Boyer
14609 161'' Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
Subject: Hearing Examiner's Final Decision
City Clerk -Jason A. Seth, CMC
RE: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat, LUA-lS-000018
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Boyer:
The City of Renton's Hearing Examiner has issued a Final Decision dated April 6, 2015.
These documents are immediately available:
• Electronically on line at the City of Renton website (www.rentonwa.gov);
• To be viewed at the City Clerk's office on the 7'h floor or Renton City Hall, 1055
South Grady Way, between 8 am and 4 pm. Ask for the project file by the above
project number; and
• For purchase at a copying charge of $0.15 per page. The estimated cost for the
Hearing Examiner Documents is $2.55, plus a handling and postage cost (this
cost is subject to change if documents are added).
APPEAL DEADLINE: RMC 4-8-080 provides that the final decision of the Hearing
Examiner is subject to appeal to the Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-110(E){14) requires
appeals of the Hearing Examiner's decision to be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days
from the date of the hearing examiner's decision. Appeals must be filed in writing
together with the required fee to the City Council, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady
Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be
obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510.
RECONSIDERATION: A request for reconsideration to the Hearing Examiner may also be
filed within this 14 day appeal period as identified in RMC 4-8-llO(E)(B) and RMC 4-8-
100(G)(9). Reconsiderations must be filed in writing to the Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Additional information regarding
1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • (425) 43Q-6510 / Fax (425) 430-6516 • rentonwa.gov
• the reconsideration process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City
Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. A new fourteen (14) day appeal period shall commence
upon the issuance of a reconsideration decision.
I can be reached at (425) 430-6510 or jseth@rentonwa.gov. Thank you.
cc: Hearing Examiner
Roca le Timmons, Senior Planner
Jennifer Henning, Planning Director
Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager
Steve lee, Development Engineering Manager
Craig Burnell, Building Official
Sabrina Mirante, Secretary, Planning Division
Ed Prince, City Councilmember
Julia Medzegian, City Council liaison
William & Mary Spiry, Owner
Parties of Record (7)
r
Denis Law r City of I
-----~M:a:yo:r _________ ... ..1~·rrwr1
April 9, 2015
City Clerk -Jason A. Seth, CMC
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF KING
) §
)
JASON A. SETH, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and
says that he is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the
age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter.
That on the 9th day of April, 2015, at the hour of 4:30 p.m. your affiant duly mailed and placed
in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail the
Hearing Examiner's Final Decision RE: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat (LUA-15-000018) to the
attached parties of record.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 9th day of April, 2015.
"''"""11111, .::-'"" ~..._svM .:1 ,,,,,
·~ $ C)~ "''"\"11111111 0 ..$) ''1 1\\\ .= 0:-.-.,.,•''<i,~·lt-J•i,,, v6-'l,, --8 ,, z ·, ; : <? = r;,\''1 l'J J,:.. y ~ I -E ()" ;:,.(J)/
' .... ,. -; -
·1 ~ ~j/) -• -.,, .,
I 7 ----"?'.'--~ U,I C") E :.:
C h . R •"'-. '-<,1,. 1110 £.-~ == ynt 1 . . ,v..,,ya 'l 6-'•,, *".. ss'~-_;;-,... = 1,, ~ J11,1 ,-.01 .,..,........... . J -
Notary Public in and for the State or,11 O't -~""',~')..~"t'._f'
Washington, residing in Renton 111 1111 111~w,,,,,,,
My Commission expires: 8/27/2018
1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • (425) 43D-651 O I Fax (425) 430-6516 • rentonwa.gov
i
Bob Metcalf
14423 160th Ave SE
Renton. WA 98059
ROGER PAULSEN
6617 SE 5th Pl
Renton, WA 98059
~1~~"'!{Jl;flt;z:~!i#",1-it'.1:~2t'?,.t~~-1~ftl~?'f:t~i ~~-;!ii;:~-~\1;;;::'.C,?s<','..1',> .... \..,~·/.t:~-'--3.'··J,.,i;,;-,i•{l)_,:,i
Tim & Linda Corner
14611160th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Kim Smith
14609 161st Ave SE
Renton. WA 98059
Rov and Kim Baver
14609 161st Ave SE
Renton. WA 98059
Tom Carpenter
15006 SE 139th Pl
Renton, WA 98059
..
Maher Joudi
D.R. Strong Consulting Eng.
620 7th Ave
Kirkland, WA 98033
Steve Lyman
14505 160th Ave SE
Renton. WA 98059
William and Marv Spirv
16023 SE 144th St
Renton. WA 98059
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CITY OF f<ENTQN
/\Pi! 0 7 2015
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF RENTON
RE: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
Preliminary Plat
LUA 15-000018
)
)
) FINAL DECISION
)
)
)
)
)
----------------~)
SUMMARY
The applicant requests preliminary plat approval for a 27-lot residential subdivision. The preliminary
plat application is approved subject to conditions.
TESTIMONY
Rocale Timmons, senior City of Renton planner, summarized the staff report. She noted that the
applicant is proposing a 25 foot dedication for 1601h Ave. S.E., which will create enough right of way
to accommodate the City's street standards. Staff determined there was existing right of way for
1601
h Ave SE based upon assessor maps.
Steve Lee, City of Renton engineering department, stated that impacts to neighboring wells will be
checked during engineering review. The groundwater level is lower than the depth of the proposed
infiltration pond. Mr. Lee stated that staff assesses the depth of groundwater and the location of
infiltration ponds when assessing potential impacts to wells. No red flags were raised in this case
given the depth of groundwater.
Maher Joudi, project engineer, noted that the trail in the tree retention tract is a soft surface trail so it
will not adversely impact trees. A tree retention plan has been prepared and hasn't yet been
submitted due to timing constraints. The applicant will be paying its fair share traffic signal funds. A
PRELIMINARY PLAT -I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I I
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
bioswale will be used to treat stormwater. Secondary drainage review is limited to the wall of the
drainage facility, not the entire downstream system.
Tom Carpenter, neighboring resident, read a written statement. He noted there is a very large
concern on the part of residents that the required stop light will make conditions worse. He noted that
there should not be impediments to traffic flow of the road, which serves as a 405 bypass. The traffic
analysis does not yet include the areas of concern. Concentrating trees in a tree retention tract
doesn't align with the dispersed character of trees on the plateau. Mr. Carpenter requested that the
examiner include language in the final decision that identifies the problems with the city's
concurrency system, which essentially authorizes any development in the city. The City's
concurrency system is atypical and violates the Growth Management Act. King County's
concurrency regulations prohibit any development on the plateau in unincorporated King County.
Mr. Carpenter recognized that the City is addressing the problem, but those efforts are too late for the
Alpine Meadows development. Mr. Carpenter stated that all platting on the plateau should be
delayed until the City completes its work on concurrency.
Robert Metcalf, neighbor, testified that many neighbors are concerned about 160'h, because it is a dirt
road with underground utilities. He is concerned about heavy equipment travelling over the
equipment. He also questioned whether part of the road width would be paved and part not. Ms.
Timmons noted that 20 feet of the width would be paved allowing for two lanes of travel. Adjoining
gravel would have to be crossed to access abutting driveways.
In staff rebuttal, Ms. Timmons noted that the staff report reference to the applicant was in error and
that the applicant is Roy and Kim Boyer and William and Marilyn Spiry, not the Quadrant Corp. Ms.
Timmons acknowledged that the City is updating its concurrency regulations. Trees will largely be
concentrated in the tree retention tract, but will also be dispersed outside of the tree retention tract via
a required ten foot landscape strip required all lot street frontages and this landscaped area will
include trees.
Maher Joudi, project engineer, noted that prior to construction the applicant would look into existing
waterlines in 1601h and replace them if they were not adequate. 1601h will not be used for heavy
equipment. The proposed pavement will be at the same level as the gravel so that the remaining
gravel would serve as a shoulder to the new road.
EXHIBITS
Exhibits 1-17 listed on page 2 of the March 24, 2015 Staff Report, in addition to the Staff Report
itself, were admitted into evidence during the public hearing. The staff powerpoint presented at the
hearing was admitted as Ex. 18. A written statement from Tom Carpenter was admitted as Ex. 19.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Procedural:
PRELIMINARY PLAT -2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
I. Applicant. Roy and Kirn Boyer; William and Merry Spiry ..
2. Hearing. The Examiner held a hearing on the subject application on March, 24 2015 in the
City of Renton Council City Chambers.
3. Project Description. The applicant requests preliminary plat approval for a 27-lot residential
subdivision. The subject property is a collection of three parcels located on the south side of SE
144th St between 160'h Ave SE and 161'1 Ave SE. The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98
dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes would range from 8,000 square feet to 13,369 square feet. Access
to the plat is proposed via an extension of 161 '' Ave SE and 1601h Ave SE. Internal circulation
terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern portion of the property. The southern portion of the site
contains grid connections from 160th to 161 st Ave SE aligned with SE I 45111 St and SE 1461h Place.
The proposal includes a tree retention tract on its southern end that includes a soft surface trail that
will connect 1601h Ave SE to 161" Ave SE. All existing structures on site are proposed to be
demolished.
3. Adequacy of Infrastructure/Public ~~rvif<;:~. As conditioned, the project will be served by
adequate/appropriate infrastructure and public services as follows:
A. Water and Sewer Service. Water service will be provided by Water District No. 90. The
District has provided a certificate of water availability for the project. Sewer service will
be provided by the City of Renton.
B. Police and fire Protection. Police and fire service would be provided by the City of
Renton. Police and fire staff have determined that sufficient resources exist to serve the
proposed development, subject to required code improvements and payment of required
fire impact fees.
C. Drainage. The proposal provides for adequate and appropriate storrnwater controls. The
applicant submitted a drainage plan and drainage report dated January 12, 2015, Ex. 8.
Staff have determined that the report demonstrates compliance with the 2009 King
County Surface Water Manual and additional City storrnwater requirements, based on
specific site conditions, as required by the Department of Community and Economic
Development. Given the absence of any compelling evidence to the contrary and the
extensive storrnwater review and conditioning of the proposal, the staffs finding of
compliance with the 2009 strornwater manual is determinative on the issue of adequacy
of stormwater controls.
The site is located within the Lower Cedar River drainage basin. Under pre-developed
conditions, site runoff sheet flows south onto neighboring properties to the south.
Downstream capacity issues have been observed and the area is considered a nuisance
requiring City maintenance work and there is potential for the proposal to aggravate
existing or create new drainage problems. The applicant is proposing to include a pond
wall of approximately 7-8-feet in height. However, due to potential seepage in and out of
the pond, a SEPA mitigation measure was issued requiring additional secondary review
PRELIMINARY PLAT-3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
during final engineering design that includes hydro-geotechnical evaluations for
buoyancy and lining, structural review and wall drainage relief against potential
hydrostatic pressures. The secondary review shall be conducted by an independent
reviewer. Additionally, the applicant would be required to provide due diligence in the
grading and collection of drainage design during the construction phase so that runoff and
erosion does not impact the neighboring properties which will likely include an
evaluation of the overflow route conveyance capacity as part of the final TIR to ensure
adequate capacity exists downstream during a 100-year event. The conditions of
approval of this decision also require the creation of a homeowner's association and City
approved maintenance agreement(s) to ensure that all stormwater facilities are properly
maintained.
D. Parks/Open Space. City ordinances require the payment of park impact fees prior to
building permit issuance. RMC 4-2-115, which governs open space requirements for
residential development, does not impose any requirements for open space for residential
development in the R-4 district. The impact fees provide for adequate parks and open
space.
E. Streets. The proposal provides for adequate and appropriate streets. The City's public
works department has determined the preliminary plat street design to provide for
adequate streets and conform to the City's street standards, subject to approval of two
street modifications, which is made a condition of approval. As shown in Ex. 2, all
proposed lots have access to a public street.
As with the neighboring Enclave preliminary plat recently approved by the City,
congestion is a major issue for this plat. City staff have determined that the proposal
meets the City's level of service standard in its concurrency determination, Ex. 16, and
the accuracy of this determination is undisputed. In his testimony Mr. Carpenter
accurately identified that the City's level of service standards authorizes development in
areas that suffer congestion that would be typically considered at failing levels in
jurisdiction using more traditional intersection level of service standards as opposed to
the transportation system-wide standard adopted by the City of Renton. Mr. Carpenter is
likely correct that many if not most jurisdictions in Washington gage level of service on
an intersection or similarly localized basis. However, RCW 36.70B.030(2)(c) and (3)
essentially provides that adopted transportation level of service standards are
determinative on the adequacy of transportation facilities. The Central Puget Sound
Growth Management Hearings Board has also ruled that level of service is a policy
choice and will be found adequate even though some areas may suffer what some
consider to be failing levels of service. See West Seattle Defense Fund v. City of Seattle,
Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board, Case No. 94-3-0016, Final
Decision and Order. As recognized by Mr. Carpenter during the hearing, the Renton City
Counci I is working on a new level of service standard that addresses a new level of
service standard that may provide for a more localized assessment of transportation
congestion. Unless and until that new standard is adopted (or the Council adopts some
interim controls) staff and the examiner are bound by the "system-wide" level of service
PRELIMINARY PLAT-4
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I I
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
standard sti 11 on the books and any decisions or conditions regarding congestion levels
must be based upon the currently adopted level of service standard.
Although the City's concurrency standard is based on a system wide standard, it still also
authorizes reasonable intersection specific mitigation. As a result, the applicant
submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by TraffEx, dated December 31, 2014
(Exhibit 9). The report states that the proposed development would generate
approximately 267 net new daily trips. During the weekday AM peak hour, the project
would generate approximately 21 net new trips (5 inbound and 16 outbound). During the
weekday PM peak hour, the project would generate approximately 28 net new trips (18
inbound and IO outbound). The report also analyzed the level of service at the following
intersections: 1601h Ave SE/SE 1441h St and 161'1 Ave SE/SE 144th St. The traffic study
states that these intersections will continue to operate at what staff considers to be an
acceptable level of service (LOS B). The proposed project docs not disclose likely
impacts to the intersections of! 561h Ave SE/SE 144 1h St and I 56'h Ave SE/SE 142nd St. As
a result a SEPA mitigation measure was issued requiring the applicant to submit a revised
Traffic Study, including an analysis of impacts caused by the proposed development to
the 156'h Ave SE/SEl44th St and the 1561h Ave SE/SE 142nd St intersections, and
recommend appropriate mitigation as necessary.
It should be noted that the City's Transportation Division has conducted an independent
study of the existing background traffic situation at the 1561h Ave SE/SE 142nd St
intersection. Based on the City's study the existing conditions warrant the installation of a
traffic signal at this intersection with or without the construction of the proposed
subdivision. With the installation of a traffic signal at this intersection, it is anticipated
that the traffic conditions in the project vicinity would improve. The installation of a
traffic signal is not included on the City's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP),
therefore transportation impacts fees would not fund the installation of a signal. Due to
the existing LOS designation 'F' at the 1561h Ave SE/SE I 42"d St intersection and the fact
that the required traffic impact fees would not fund a traffic signal at this intersection, a
SEPA mitigation measure was issued, requiring the applicant to be responsible for paying
their fair share of the cost of a new signal to be installed at the 1561h Ave SE/SE 142nd St
intersection based on any new PM peak hour trips. The fee will be based on new PM
peak hour trips/1,310 Total PM peak hour trips x $500,000 ( cost of new signal) and shall
be paid prior to the recording of the final plat.
Increased traffic created by the development would be mitigated by payment of
transportation impact fees. Currently this fee is assessed at $2,143.70 per new single-
family home. The fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of
building permit issuance shall be payable to the City.
PRELIMINARY PLAT-5
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
F. Parking. Sufficient area exists, on each lot, to accommodate the two required parking
spaces per lot required by RMC 4-4-080(F)( 10)( d).
G. Schools. The proposal provides for adequate provisions for schools and walking
conditions to and form school. It is anticipated that the Issaquah School District can
accommodate any additional students generated by this proposal at the following schools:
Briarwood Elementary ( 1.25 miles from the subject site), Maywood Middle School (0.5
miles from the subject site) and Liberty High School (1.22 miles from the subject site).
RCW 58.17.110(2) provides that no subdivision be approved without making a written
finding of adequate provisions for safe walking conditions for students who walk to and
from school and/or bus stops. Maywood Middle is within walking distance of the subject
site while Briarwood Elementary and Liberty High schools would require future students
to be transported to school via bus. The bus stop for Briarwood Middle school is
currently located at 1601h Ave SE and 144th Ave SE. The bus stop for Liberty High
School is located at SE 1441h ST and 161 '1 Ave SE.
The applicant is proposing to provide street frontage improvements, including sidewalks,
along the south side of the street for the frontage of the property (SE 1441h St). To the
east of the subject site there are intermittent sidewalks on the south side of the street with
primarily a 6-9 foot shoulder delineated by a fog line. A majority of the possible school
walk route is outside the City of Renton limits and is in the King County jurisdiction.
The one crossing intersection in the City at 161" Ave. SE has a Stop Sign Control, which
provides adequate protection for crossing children. Outside the City along SE 144th St,
King County has installed 20mph School Speed Limit signing with flashing beacons and
other warning signs as well as a crosswalk at the school driveway. No other
improvements are necessary at this time for safe walking routes to school.
A School Impact Fee, based on ne\V single family lots, will also be required in order to
mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to Issaquah School District. The fee is payable
to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of building permit
application. Currently the fee is assessed at $4,560.00 per single family residence.
4. Adverse lmpac~. There are no adverse impacts associated with the proposal as conditioned.
Adequate public facilities and drainage control are provided as determined in Finding of Fact No. 3.
The proposal involves single-family housing at a density 3.98 dwelling units per acre, which is
allowed for the R-4 zoning district. This is a legislatively set standard of what is considered a
compatible density for the area. Consequently, there are no issues of compatibility with surrounding
development based on density. There are no critical areas on the project site. There were some
concerns expressed about how 1601h would be developed, but these concerns were adequately
addressed during the hearing by staff and the applicant. 1601h will be paved to a sufficient width to
accommodate two-way traffic on public right of way. There was a comment made that 160 1h is a
private road, but no evidence was presented to support this position and staff demonstrated through
their review of assessor maps that there will be sufficient public right of way once the applicant
makes its required dedications to accommodate a two lane public road. Final engineering review
will ensure that underground utilities in 1601h do not become harmed by the 1601h road improvements
PRELIMINARY PLAT-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
and the construction equipment used to develop the proposed subdivision. There were also concerns
raised about impacts to adjoining wells. As testified by staff, the groundwater levels and location of
the infiltration pond don't raise any red flags about potential impacts to wells. No evidence was
submitted identifying any potential adverse impact to the wells. In the absence of any such evidence
and the analysis provided by staff, it cannot be concluded that the proposal creates any risk to wells.
The proposal retains a sufficient amount of trees as set by City standards. The applicant
submitted a Tree Arborist Report prepared by Green forest Incorporated Consulting Arborist ( dated
January 5, 2015) (Exhibit 13). There are a total of 598 trees located on site. The applicant is
required to retain 30 percent of the trees located on site that are not located within critical areas,
proposed rights-of~way and access easements. Of the 598 trees located on site, 260 trees would be
excluded from the tree retention requirements. The provided tree retention worksheet indicates 14
trees are considered dead diseased or dangerous, and 246 trees are located within proposed public
streets. Therefore, the applicant would be required to retain at least 102 trees on site. The applicant
has proposed to retain I 02 trees thereby complying with Tree Retention requirements of the code
(Exhibit 12). The proposed tree retention plan does not reflect the revised plat plan submitted on
March 3, 2015 (Exhibit 15). A detailed tree retention plan, complying with RMC 4-4-130, will be
required to be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager prior to
engineering permit approval. The conditions of approval and SEPA mitigation measures include
requirements that assure that the tree retention plan will be maintained in perpetuity and is
responsive to changes in project design submitted after submission of the tree retention plan.
Conclusions of Law
I. Authority. RMC 4-7-020(C) and 4-7-050(0)(5) provide that the Hearing Examiner shall
hold a hearing and issue a final decision on preliminary plat applications.
2. Zoning/Comprehensive Plan Designations. The property is zoned R-4. The comprehensive
plan designations is Residential Low Density (RLD).
3. Review Criteria. Chapter 4-7 RMC governs the criteria for subdivision review. Applicable
standards are quoted below in italics and applied through corresponding conclusions of law.
RMC 4-7-080(B): A subdivision shall be consistent with the following principles of acceptability:
1. Legal Lots: Create legal building sites which comply with all provisions of the City Zoning Code.
2. Access: Establish access to a public road for each segregated parcel.
3. Physical Characteristics: Ilave suitable physical characterislics. A proposed plat may be denied
because ofjlood, inundation, or wetland conditions. Construction of protective improvements may
be required as a condition <!f approval, and such improvements shall be noted on the.final plat.
4. Drainage: Make adequate provision for drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water
supplies and sanitary wastes.
4. As to compliance with the Zoning Code, pages 7-8 of the staff report is adopted by reference
as if set forth in full. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 3(E), each lot has access to a public road.
As determined in Finding of Fact No. 4, there are no critical areas on the project site and no other
physical characteristics evident from the record that have not been adequately addressed by the
PRELIMINARY PLAT -7
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
proposal. No flooding problems are anticipated because as determined in Finding of Fact No. 3 the
proposal is served by adequate/appropriate stormwatcr facilities and the project is not located in any
critical area, which includes floodplains. As determined in Finding of Fact No. 3, the proposal
provides for adequate public facilities.
5. RMC 4-7-080(1)(1): ... The Hearing Examiner shall assure coeformance with the general
purposes of the Comprehensive Plan and adopted standards ...
6. The proposed preliminary play is consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan as outlined
in pages 6-7 of the staff report, which is incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full.
RMC 4-7-120(A): No plan for the replatting, subdivision, or dedication of any areas shall be
approved by the Hearing Examiner unless the streets shown therein are connected by surfaced road
or street (according to City specifications) lo an existing street or highway.
7. All of the internal roads of the proposed subdivision connect to existing public roads,
specifically 1601h and 161" Ave SE.
RMC 4-7-120(8): The location of all streets shall conform to any adopted plansjiJr streets in the
City.
8. The City's adopted street plans are not addressed in the staff report or anywhere else in the
administrative record. The proposal provides for connections to all adjoining through streets, which
should assure conformance to any applicable street plan.
RMC 4-7-120(C): If a subdivision is located in the area of an officially designed [sic] trail.
16 provisions shall be made for reservation of the right-of-way or for easements to the City for trail
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
purposes.
9. The subdivision is not located in the area of an officially designated trail. The applicant is
proposing a soft surface trail through its tree retention tract in order to connect 1601h Ave SE to 161 st
Ave SE.
RMC 4-7-130(C): A plat, short plat, subdivision or dedication shall be prepared in coeformance
with the jiJl/owing provisions:
I. land Unsuitable for Subdivision: Land which is found to be unsuitable for subdivision includes
land with features likely to be harmful to the safety and general health of the fi1ture residents (such
as lands adversely affected by flooding, steep slopes, or rock formations). Land which the
Department or the Hearing Examiner considers inappropriate jiJr subdivision shall not be
subdivided unless adequate safeguards are provided against these adverse conditions.
a. Flooding/Inundation: If any portion of the land within the boundary ofa preliminary plat is
subject to flooding or inundation, that portion of the subdivision must have the approval of the State
according lo chapter 86. I 6 RCW bejiJre the Department and the Hearing Examiner shall consider
such subdivision.
PRELIMINARY PLAT-8
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
l l
12
13
14
15
b. Steep Slopes: A plat, short plat, subdivision or dedication which would result in the creation of a
lot or lots that primarily have slopesforty percent (40%) or greater as measured per RMC 4-3-
050.Jla, without adequate area at lesser slopes upon which development may occur, shall not be
approved.
3. Land Clearing and Tree Retention: Shall comply with RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land
Clearing Regulations.
4. Streams:
a. !'reservation: Every reasonable effort shall be made to preserve exisling streams, bodies of water,
and wetland areas.
b. Method: ff a stream passes through any of the subject property, a plan shall be presented which
indicates how the stream will be preserved. The methodologies used should include an overflow
area, and an attempt to minimize the disturbance of the natural channel and stream bed.
c. Culver ting: The piping or tunneling of water shall be discouraged and allowed only when going
under streets.
d. Clean Water: Every effort shall be made to keep all streams and bodies of water clear of debris
and pollutants.
10. The criterion is met. The land is suitable for subdivision as the storm water design assures
that it will not contribute to flooding and that water quality will not be adversely affected.
Development will not encroach into critical areas or adversely affect streams or any bodies of water
as there are no critical areas, streams or other bodies of water on site. No piping or tunneling of
streams is proposed. Trees will be retained as required by RMC 4-4-130 as determined in Finding of
Fact No. 4.
RMC 4-7-140: Approval of all subdivisions located in either single family residential or multi-
16 family residential zones as defined in the Zoning Code shall be contingent upon the subdivider 's
dedication of land or providin,rfees in lieu of dedication to the City, all as necessary to mitigate the
adverse effects of development upon the existing park and recreation service levels. The
requirements and procedures for this mitigation shall be per the City of Renton Parks Mitigation
Resolution.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
11. City ordinances require the payment of park impact fees prior to building permit issuance.
RMC 4-7-lSO(A): The proposed street system shall extend and create connections between existing
streets unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. Prior to approving a street
system that does not extend or connect, the Reviewing Official shall find that such exception shall
meet the requirements of subsection E3 of this Section. The roadway class/fications shall be as
defined and designated by the Department.
12. The proposal connects to all adjoining existing streets. 1601
h Ave SE is not extended to the
southern property line in anticipation of any future extension of that street, because the property to
the south has already been platted as discussed in Conclusion of Law No. 16.
RMC 4-7-lSO(B): All proposed street names shall be approved by the City.
PRELIMINARY PLAT -9
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
13. As conditioned.
RMC 4-7-lSO(C): Slreets intersecling with existing or proposed public highways, major or
secondary arterials shall be held lo a minimum.
14. The proposal does not intersect with an arterial or public highway.
RMC 4-7-lSO(D): The alignment of all streets shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works
Department. The street standards set by RMC 4-6-060 shall apply unless otherwise approved. Street
alignment offsets of less than one hundred twenty five feet (125') are not desirable, but may be
approved by the Department upon a showing of need but only after provision of all necessary safety
measures.
15. As determined in Finding of Fact 3, the Public Works Department has reviewed and
approved the adequacy of streets, which includes compliance with applicable street standards except
for two standards that need approval of a street standard modification. Approval of these
modifications is made a condition of approval.
RMC 4-7-lSO(E):
I. Grid: A grid street pattern shall be used to connect exisling and new development and shall be the
predominant street pattern in any subdivision permitted by this Section.
2. Linkages: Linkages, including streets, sidewalks, pedestrian or bike paths, shall be provided
within and between neighborhoods when they can create a continuous and interconnected network
of roads and pathways. Implementation of this requirement shall comply with Comprehensive Plan
Transportation Element Objective T-A and Policies T-9 through 1~ 16 and Community Design
Element, Objective CD-Mand Policies CD-50 and CD-60.
3. Exceptions:
a. The grid pattern may be adjusted to a "flexible grid" by reducing the number of linkages or the
alignment between roads, where thefollowingfactors are present on site:
i. Infeasible due to topographical/environmental constraints; and/or
ii. Substantial improvements are existing.
4. Connections: Prior to adoption of a complete grid street plan, reasonable connections that link
existing portions of the grid system shall be made. At a minimum, stub streets shall be required
within subdivisions to allow future connectivity.
5. Alley Access: Alley access is the preferred stree/ patlern exceplji,r properties in the Residential
Low Density land use designation. The Residential Low Density land use designation includes /he
PRELIMINARY PLAT -I 0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
RC, R-1, and R-4 zones. Prior to approval of a plat without alley access, the Reviewing Official shall
evaluate an alley layout and determine that the use ofalley(s) is not feasible ...
6. Alternative Configurations: Off.set or loop road5 are the preferred alternative configurations.
7. Cul-de-Sac Streets: Cul-de-sac streets may only be permitted by the Reviewing Official where due
to demonstrable physical constraints no.future connection to a larger street pattern is physically
possible.
16. The proposal connects to all adjoining through streets. The property is located in the RLD
designation so alley access is not encouraged. There is insufficient space for offset or loop roads. A
cul-de-sac is necessary because there is no present or future road connection available between 160
and 161 '' in the southern portion of the plat.
An extension of I 60'h Ave SE to the southern property line would normally be required to maintain a grid
pattern, but that is not feasible for this project. The original plan did include this extension. However,
the existing subdivision abutting the subject property to the south was constructed in the 1980's
and is therefore not likely to be redeveloped in the near future. There is however, property
immediately to the southwest which has potential to redevelop. As a result, staffs preliminary
comments recommended 160th Ave SE be realigned in manner that would allow for the extension
of 1601h Ave SE to SE 148"• St and not require dedications from the existing subdivision abutting the
property to the south. The revised plat plan, submitted by the applicant includes a
taper/realignment of 160th Ave SE to eliminate the need for the dedications from the properties
abutting to the south (Exhibit 15). A street modification is needed in order to modify the street
cross-section south of proposed Road 'A' to achieve the realignment. Therefore the conditions of
approval require a street modification be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning
Project Manager prior to engineering permit approval for a modification of the 160th Ave SE street
cross section, south of Road 'A', in order to realign the extension of 160'" Ave SE to the west. Staff
would be supportive of such a request to the extent a pedestrian connection is provided from 1601h
Ave SE to 161" Ave SE along the southern portion boundary of the site as well as the revised design
being a more desirable alignment to the City.
RMC 4-7-150(F): All adjacent rights-o.fway and new rights-of-way dedicated as part of the plat,
including streets, roads, and alleys, shall be graded to their full width and the pavement and
sidewalks shall be constructed as specified in the street standards or deferred by the
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator or his/her designee.
22 17. As proposed and as shall be required during engineering review.
23
24
25
26
RMC 4-7-150(G): Streets that may be extended in the event offuture adiacent platting shall be
required to be dedicated to the plat boundary line. Extensions of greater depth than an average lot
shall be improved with temporary turnarounds. Dedication of a fidl-width boundary street shall be
required in certain instances to facilitate future development.
PRELIMINARY PLAT -11
2
3
4
18. As determined in Conclusion of Law No. 16, 1601h Ave SE is not a street that can be
construed as subject to potential future extension due to the development of the plat to the south.
There are no other future street extensions available for the proposal.
RMC 4-7-170(A): Insofar as practical, side lot lines shall be at right angles to street lines or radial
to curved street lines.
As depicted in Ex. 15, the side lines are in conformance with the requirement quoted above. 5 19.
6 RMC 4-7-170(B): Each lot must have access to a public street or road. Access may be by private
access easement street per the requirements of the street standards. 7
8 20. As previously determined, each lot has access to a public street.
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
RMC 4-7-170(C): The size, shape, and orientation of lots shall meet the minimum area and widlh
requirements of the applicable zoning classification and shall be appropriate for the type of
development and use contemplated. Further subdivision of lots within a plat approved through the
provisions of this Chapter must be consistent with the then-current applicable maximum density
requirement as measured within the plat as a whole.
21. As previously determined, the proposed lots comply with the zoning standards of the R-4
zone, which includes area, width and density.
RMC 4-7-170(D): Width between side lo/ lines at /heir foremos/ points (i.e., the points where the
side lot lines intersect with /he .1·/reet right-of-way line) shall not be less than eighty percent (80%) of
the required lot width except in the cases of(]) pipes/em lots, which shall have a minimum width of
twenty feet (20') and (2) lots on a street curve or the turning circle of cul-de-sac (radial lots), which
shall be a minimum of thirty five feet (35').
22. As shown in Ex. 15, the requirement is satisfied.
19 RMC 4-7-170(E): All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way, except alleys,
shall have minimum radius of fifteen feet (15').
20
21
22
23
23. As conditioned.
RMC 4-7-190(A): Due regard shall be shown to all natural features such as large trees,
watercourses, and similar community assets. Such natural.features should be preserved, thereby
adding at/racliveness and value to the properly.
There are no critical areas or any other significant natural features at the project site. 24 24.
25 RMC 4-7-200(A): Unless septic tanks are specifically approved by the Public Works Department
and the King County Heailh Department, sanitary sewers shall he provided by the developer al no
cost to the City and designed in accordance with City standards. Side sewer lines shall be installed 26
PRELIMINARY PLAT-12
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
eight feet (8') into each lot if sanitary sewer mains are available, or provided with the subdivision
development.
25. As conditioned.
RMC 4-7-200(B): An adequate drainage system shall be provided for the proper drainage of all
surface water. Cross drains shall be provided to accommodate all natural water flow and shall be of
sufficient length to permit full-width roadway and required slopes. The drainage system shall be
designed per the requirements of RMC 4-6-030, Drainage (Surface Water) Standards. The drainage
system shall include detention capacity for the new street areas. Residential plats shall also include
detention capacity for fature development of the lots. Water quality features shall also be designed to
provide capacity fi,r the new street pavingfiJr the plat.
26. The proposal provides for adequate drainage that is in conformance with applicable City
drainage standards as determined in Finding of Fact No. 4. The City's stormwater standards. which
are incorporated into the technical information report and will be further implemented during civil
plan review, ensure compliance with all of the standards in the criterion quoted above.
RMC 4-7-200(C): The water distribution ,ystem including the locations of fire hydrants shall be
12 designed and installed in accordance with City standards as defined by the Department and Fire
13
14
15
Department requirements.
27. Compliance will be assured during civil plan review prior to final plat approval.
RMC 4-7-200(0): All utilities designed to serve the subdivision shall be placed underground. Any
utilities installed in the parking strip shall be placed in such a manner and depth to permit the
16 planting of trees. Those utilities to be located beneath paved surj,1ces shall be installed, including all
service connections, as approved by the Department. Such installation shall be completed and
approved prior to the application of any surface material. Easements may be required fi,r the
maintenance and operation of utilities as specified by the Department.
17
18
19 28. As conditioned.
20
21
22
23
RMC 4-7-200(E): Any cable TV conduits shall be undergrounded at the same lime as other basic
utilities are installed to serve each lot. Conduit for service connections shall be laid to each lot line
by subdivider as to obviate the necessity for disturbing the street area, including sidewalks, or alley
improvements when such service connections are extended to serve any building. The cost of
trenching, conduit, pedestals and/or vaults and laterals as well as easements therefore required to
bring service to the development shall be borne by the developer and/or land owner. 1he subdivider
shall be responsible only for conduit to serve his development. Conduit ends shall be elbowed to
24 final ground elevation and capped. The cable TV company shall provide maps and specifications to
the subdivider and shall inspect the conduit and certify to the City that it is properly installed.
25
26 29. As conditioned.
PRELIMINARY PLAT-13
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
RMC 4-7-210:
A. MONUMENTS:
Concrete permanent control monuments shall be established at each and every controlling corner of
the subdivision. Interior monuments shall be located as determined by the Department. All surveys
shall be per the City of Renton surveying standards.
B. SURVEY:
All other lot corners shall be marked per the City surveying standards.
C. STREET SIGNS·
The subdivider shall install all street name signs necessary in the subdivision.
30. As conditioned.
DECISION
The proposed preliminary plat is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with mitigation measures issued as part of the Mitigated
Determination of Non-Significance for the proposal.
2. All proposed street names shall be approved by the City.
3. All lot corners at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way, except alleys, shall have
minimum radius of fifteen feet (15').
4. Side sewer lines shall be installed eight feet (8') into each lot if sanitary sewer mains are
available, or provided with the subdivision development.
5. All utilities designed to serve the subdivision shall be placed underground. Any utilities
installed in the parking strip shall be placed in such a manner and depth lo permit the
planting of trees. Those utilities to be located beneath paved surfaces shall be installed,
including all service connections, as approved by the Department of Public Works. Such
installation shall be completed and approved prior to the application of any surface material.
Easements may be required for the maintenance and operation of utilities as specified by the
Department of Public Works.
6. Any cable TV conduits shall be undergrounded at the same time as other basic utilities are
installed to serve each lot. Conduit for service connections shall be laid to each lot line by
Applicant as to obviate the necessity for disturbing the street area, including sidewalks, or
alley improvements when such service connections are extended to serve any building. The
cost of trenching, conduit, pedestals and/or vaults and laterals as well as easements therefore
required to bring service to the development shall be borne by the developer and/or land
owner. The applicant shall be responsible only for conduit to serve his development. Conduit
ends shall be elbowed to final ground elevation and capped. The cable TV company shall
PRELIMINARY PLAT -14
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
provide maps and specifications to the applicant and shall inspect the conduit and certify to
the City that it is properly installed.
7. The applicant shall install all street name signs necessary in the subdivision prior to final plat
approval.
8. All structures proposed for removal shall be demolished and all inspections complete
prior to Final Plat approval.
9. The applicant shall establish and record a permanent and irrevocable deed restriction on
the property title of the tree protection tract. Such deed restriction shall prohibit
development, alteration, or disturbance within the tract except for the purposes of
installing Administrator approved amenities or habitat enhancement activities, as part of
an enhancement project, which has received prior written approval from the City. A
covenant shall be placed on the tract restricting its separate sale and shall be recorded
prior to or concurrent with the recording of the Final Plat.
10. The applicant shall place permanent fencing on the perimeter of the tree protection tract.
This shall be accomplished by installing a wood, split-rail fence with applicable signage.
The Administrator may approve pedestrian-sized openings for the purpose of facilitating
passive recreation within the tract for the benefit of the community. The Administrator
may authorize alternate styles and/or materials for the required fencing. The proposed
fencing shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager
prior to engineering permit approval.
11. A street modification shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning
Project Manager prior to engineering permit approval for a modification of the 1601h Ave
SE street cross section, south of Road 'A', in order to realign the extension of 160'h Ave
SE to the west.
12. A street modification shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning
Project Manager, prior to engineering permit approval, for a modification to reduce the
required right-of-way width of Road 'A' from 53 feet to 4 7 feet.
13. The applicant shall be required to record a public access easement across the proposed
soft surface trail extended from the termination of 160thAve SE sidewalk, through the
proposed Tree Retention Tract (Tract 'C'), to 161st Ave SE. The easement shall be
recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the recording of the Final Plat.
14. A covenant shall be recorded on the face of the plat restricting vehicular access for
proposed Lots 17-20 to the proposed public alley/unnamed road and proposed Lots 1-8,
21-27 from Road 'B'. Additionally, proposed Lots 17-20's front yards and front
fayade/elevations shall be oriented to the north (SE 144th St).
15. The applicant shall be required to create a homeowners' association and maintenance
agreement(s) for the shared utilities, stormwater facilities, and maintenance and
responsibilities for all shared improvements of this development. A draft of the
document(s) shall be submitted to Current Planning Project Manager for review and
approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording of the
final plat.
PRELIMINARY PLAT -l 5
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
DATED this 6th day of April, 2015.
City of Renton Hearing Examiner
Appeal Right and Valuation Notices
RMC 4-8-080 provides that the final decision of the hearing examiner is subject to appeal to the
Renton City Council. RMC 4-8-l 10(E)(l4) requires appeals of the hearing examiner's decision
to be filed within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the hearing examiner"s decision.
A request for reconsideration to the hearing examiner may also be filed within this 14 day appeal
period as identified in RMC 4-8-l lO(E)(l3) and RMC 4-8-IOO(G)(9). A new fourteen (14) day
appeal period shall commence upon the issuance of the reconsideration. Additional information
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -
71
" floor, ( 425) 430-6510.
Affected property owners may request a change m valuation for property tax purposes
notwithstanding any program ofrevaluation.
PRELIMINARY PLAT -16
HEX Public Hearing
Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner
March 24, 2015
-----~rr ~1r tDsJ
C.nmmunuyond f_,.,...,m,,· llf'd"l""""'I
Site Char'acte-ristics
® . -
B,icf Description
EXHIBIT IB
LUA /yL/t,WG .
DATE: 3 /2.,f /.zo;~
3/24/2015
CITY OF RENTON ILANNING DIVISION
Appr{wals Requested
The applicant is requesting a Preliminary Plat Review for the
subdivision of the subject site into no more than 27 single family
lots.
The application was accepted for review on January 14, 2015
• 120-day review compliance
• Vested to the former RMC Title-IV development standards
Staff received one comment letter by an interested party
regarding water quality and access.
On February 23, 2015, the ERC issued a Determination of Non-
Significance-M with four mitigation measures. An appeal period
commenced on February 27, 2015 and ended on March 13,
2015. No appeals were filed.
--------RE. N TON
.c_SE 144TH ST -,~-, ,,.
f.c •ff.)
!
' . t:, /
' 'Cl,
ROADA
I _J
~
~pl
Brief De;jcript1011
,1-~ . -
-' ",.!.,... ------;, ---::: . . ,,..
1
-;,SE 144TH ST
:ID_ r.:--Brief Description r ·1.
f ROAD A
I ~
Preliminary Plat Analysis
o'fflprohon1hlo Plan Compllan«1 ind Canmtoncy
• rhe pr<111"'"t compli• wfth tt.. County's Cam.,..i,an.111• Pion objKtivN and
p,llelo> ~ •II amd~kU'I> ol oppnMII ,,. mot.
ninJ; Dovok>p,mont Stond1l'O Compllon«11nd Corulnoncv
•Tho-p,._..I MS demo--.:! eomplian<t,wilh mostdw.k,wi-nt flond,rds at
~ ~::::;,~:~.:::~ eond~oru o1,p-l 1~
poul ii «1mpllam with 1ho Community Al!lot rq"latio,.._ · O] --~----~----·----~--
Analysis
vailability and Impact on Public Services
• Parks, Police, Fire PreYl!ntion, and School District staff
indicated that sufficient resources exist to furnish
services to the proposed development If required
improvements and fees are provided.
• RCW 58.17.110!2) provides that no subdivision be 'q;
approved without makine: a written finding of adequ11te
proYision made for safe walking conditions for students
who walk to and from school.
• The site ls served by the City of Renton for sewer ;;md ·11·
Water District 90 for water. lv;
• A preliminary drainage plan and drainage report has
been submitted with the application in accordance with ,0;
the 2009 KCSWM.
Rr. NTON
3/24/2015
Brief Description
Analysis
4-,;1111""\ubdivision Reilulation Compliance and Conslstencv :1-----~
•The proposal is complianl Mth tha niviewcriteria for I he
subd;..isionsp,rrsuant 10 RMC 4-7 If all recomme,nded conditions of
appn,v,il are comphed wilh
CompatlblhtyWlth Existlns Land Use and Plan
Streets
Slod<s
Residentl.al Lots
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Alpine Nursery
Preliminary Plat, as depicted in Exhibit 15 subject
to 11 conditions of annroval.
i',
• I ' . ® . . -. 'l' ._-..:
2
Original Pla1 Plan
---._
RE:-.: TON
.-------.'"""''
Revised Plat Plan
Traffic
160th Ave SE
-------....
RENTO:\
,,
' ' ,,
3/24/2015
Streots
~J
1 •r• L '! . I . ,
! rid ' i : J
ii! . : :
I : ·-·
lLJ ::_~~ :
Schools
3
"
.
.
Sewel'"
Recommended Condition (#11):
The applicant shall submit a
revised utility plan extending the
sewer main from SE t 44th street
to SE 145TH street and a my
sewer main berween SE 146TH
PL and sourti end or lheirproperty
tine. 1he plan sriall be submitted
to, and approved by, me Plsn
Reviewer prior to engirieering
permit approval.
Recommended Condition (#10): The applicant shall submit a revised
drainage rnport prior to engineering permrt approval containing a Level II
drainage analysis ;mo any resun111g requirements for detention shaU b8
incorporated into the proposal. The Level II analysis will be waived 11 !he
applicant uses WHMM modeling 1or stormwatercalculallons .
3/24/2015
4
EXHIBIT ;/;!:/o/ {U-~
IA IYt2tZ212/8
ATE: ;;J/24/;2t?,;',5-
cirv or(~rC>N /ii'NN1NG 01v1s10N
I'm here to request that the Hearing Examiner include in his report comments rei@Vdrll lb me Cbritext Of
yet another development on the plateau east of Renton that's beginning its journey through the
process.
I'm clear that the HE responsibility focuses on the fundamental question of compliance to Renton city
policies, codes, and practices. Although I hope there is reason for the HE to deny this preliminary plat,
I'm not here with that as my primary objective.
I want to point out a context that appears irrelevant to the specific question of plat approval.
I assume the HE remembers the issue of the transportation situation that most recently got exposed
during the Enclave at Bridal Ridge development permitting. Quite simply, Renton's policies and codes
are permitting development in areas blatantly failing the "intent" of concurrency. Unfortunately, those
policies and codes don't consider the area to be failing.
As a reminder, currently Renton measures transportation concurrency at a holistic level, meaning that
the city measures the transformation performance at the entire city level which means that no road
segment or intersection will fail concurrency until the entire city fails.
The net of this approach is that the city will never deny development, regardless of whether it impacts
the more conventional measures of currency like road segment throughput or intersection delay. Quite
simply, the Renton transportation concurrency system is uniquely atypical, completely counter-intuitive,
while violating the obvious intent that the Washington Growth Management Act in these circumstances.
This area of the city neighbors unincorporated urban areas which begs the question of what King County
is doing relevant to transportation concurrency testing and permitting on parcels only feet away from
Enclave and Alpine developments.
Since the 2008 update to the King County Comprehensive Plan, the entire xxxmiles of Travel Shed 12
which includes all the plateau east of Renton is failing concurrency. As a result, no transportation
concurrency certificates are being issued for the area, thus denying development permits.
The county met their version of the Transportation Concurrency being faced by Renton during the
county's 2008 Comprehensive Plan update. Things had gotten so bad that the county Council created a
Transportation Concurrency Expert Review Panel to 1) provide guidance to KC DOT as they reformed
concurrency, and 2) provide the KC Council with a view independent of KC DOT.
The net results was a concurrency system that viewed vehicle traffic in the context of what the county
calls "Travel Sheds", an acknowledgement of the fact that traffic tended to collect, connect, and
distribute in definable areas. Further, the county's concurrency approach also recognized how
development in an area could impact road segments and/or intersections in areas quite removed from
the development epicenter.
The good news is the city has recognized this major issue and is spending significant consultant funds to
radically reform the situation. Unfortunately, we are caught in the middle of a recognized
transportation concurrency program failure apparently unable to deal with the interim period between
now and when Renton next approves its Comprehensive Plan update.
The Enclave at Bridal Ridge development permitting is under appeal by local residents simply because of
this situation.
As I mentioned at the beginning, at a minimum I'm asking the HE to become familiar enough with the
irrational concurrency system in existence on the plateau east of Renton to be comfortable adding
comments about the condition on the ruling on the preliminary plat. That the HE recognizes that any
development in the area of this horrible transportation issues that is making the situation worse. At a
maximum, I ask that the HE add his voice to the urgency residents are painfully aware of.
I ask the HE to help us exhaust all options that would have permitting for all development in the area,
including platting, be delayed until Renton can compete what appears to be a comprehensive update to
their transportation concurrency policies and practices. Platting is included because, in the context of
solving the transportation infrastructure concurrency issues, which require a more holistic view of the
transportation network in the area, decisions like road access to the plat could easily be viewed
differently.
Thank you, and, if you're not fully familiar with how profound this issue is, I'm very willing to provide
whatever background and understand you desire.
Tom Carpenter
15006 SE 139" Place
Renton, WA 98059
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 18, 2015
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Sabrina Mirante
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office.
Project Name: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
LUA (file) Number: LUA-15-000018, ECF, PP
Cross-References:
AKA's:
Project Manager: Rocale Timmons
Acceptance Date: January 15, 2015
Applicant: Roy Boyer
Owner: William and Mary Spiry
Contact: Roy Boyer
PID Number: 2323059044
ERC Determination: DNS-M Date: February 23, 2015
Anneal Period Ends: March 13. 2015
Administrative Decision: Date:
Aeeeal Period Ends:
Public Hearing Date: March 24, 2015
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision: Date:
Anneal Period Ends:
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Council Decision: Date:
Mylar Recording Number:
-
I
!
'
I
I
I 4
'j
a
Project Description: The applicant is requesting SEPA & Preliminary Plat approval for a 27 lot I
subdivision with three tracts. The 9.64-acre site is located within the Residential-4 dwelling units I
per acre (R-4) zoning classification. The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98. Access to the plat -
is proposed via an extension of 161st Ave SE and a partial extension of 160th Ave SE. There
annears to be no critical areas located on site.
Location: 16023 SE 144th & 14609/14625 161 st Ave SE
Comments:
ERC Determination Types: DNS -Determination of Non-Significance; DNS-M -Determination of
Non-Significance-Mitigated; DS -Determination of Significance.
March 17, 2015
Roy and Kim Boyer
14609 161'1 Ave SE
Renton,INA 98059
Community & Economic Development Department
C.E. "Chi p"Vincent, Administrator
SUBJECT: Report to the Hearing Examiner
Alpine Nursery, LUA15-000018, ECF, PP
Dear M/M Boyer:
A public hearing on Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat will be held on Tuesday, March 24, 2015 at
11:00 am in the City Council Chambers of Renton City Hall, located at 1055 S Grady \Nay. The
Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner, including exhibits and public comment letters, is
immediately available:
• Electronically on line at the City of Renton website (www.rentonwa.gov). or,
• Can be viewed at the City Clerk's office on the 7'h Floor at Renton City Hall, 1055 S Grady
\Nay, between 8 am and 4 pm. Ask for the project file by the project number
LUA15-000018, ECF, PP. or,
• Purchased for a copying charge of $0.15 per page. The estimated cost for the staff
report is $5.00, plus a handling and postage cost of $2.00 (this cost is subject to change
if documents are added).
Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 or rtimrnons@rentonwa.gov if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Rocale Timmons
Senior Planner
cc: William & Mary Spiry, Kim Smith/ Owner(s)
Steve Lyman,Maher Joudi,Tim&Linda Corner, Roger Paulsen/ Party(ies) of Record
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
DEPARTMENT OF COMI\ ITV
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST
HEARING DATE:
Project Name:
Owner:
Applicant:
Contact:
File Number:
Project Manager:
Project Summary:
Project Location:
Site Area:
March 24, 2015
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
Roy & Kim Boyer; 14609 161'1 Ave SE; Renton, WA 98059
William & Marilyn Spiry; 16023 SE 1441h St; Renton, WA 98059
Barbara Rodgers; Quadrant Corp; 14725 SE 36 1h St, Suite 100; Bellevue, WA 98006
Roy & Kim Boyer; 14609 161" Ave SE; Renton, WA 98059
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner
The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and Preliminary Plat
approval for a 27 lot subdivision with three tracts for open space, tree retention,
and drainage. The subject property is a collection of three parcels located on the
south side of SE 1441h St between 1601h Ave SE and 161" Ave SE. The resulting
9.64-acre site is located within the Residential-4 dwelling units per acre (R-4)
zoning classification. The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98 dwelling units
per acre. Lot sizes would range from 8,000 square feet to 13,369 square feet.
Access to the plat is proposed via an extension of 161" Ave SE and 160'h Ave SE.
Internal circulation terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern portion of the
property. The southern portion of the site contains grid connections from 160th
to 161st Ave SE aligned with SE 1451h St and SE 1461h Place. All existing structures
on site are proposed to be demolished. There are 598 significant trees on the site
of which the applicant is proposing to retain 102 trees. There appear to be no
critical areas located on site.
16023 SE 1441h St/14625 161'1 Ave SE
9.64 acres
Project Location Map
HEX Report
City of Renton Deportment of Community & Economic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PL
Preliminary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015
~ B. EXHIBITS:
Exhibit 1: ERC Report (dated February 23, 2015)
Exhibit 2: Preliminary Plat Plan (dated January 12, 2015)
Exhibit 3: Landscape Plan (dated January 12, 2015)
Exhibit 4: Aerial Photo
Exhibit 5: Wetland Evaluation (dated January 4, 2015)
Exhibit 6: Drainage Administrative Interpretation
Exhibit 7: Geotechnical Report (dated June 5, 2014)
Exhibit 8: Drainage Report {dated June 2, 2014)
Exhibit 9: Traffic Impact Analysis (dated May, 2014)
Exhibit 10: Infiltration Analysis (January 9, 2015)
Exhibit 11: Public Comments: Corner (dated January 20, 2015)
Exhibit 12: Tree Retention Plan
Exhibit 13: Tree Retention Report (dated January 5, 2015)
Exhibit 14: SEPA Determination and Mitigation Measures (dated February 27, 2015)
Exhibit 15: Revised Preliminary Plat Plan (dated March 3,2015)
Exhibit 16: Transportation Concurrency Approval
Exhibit 17: HEX Recommendation (dated March 17, 2015)
II C. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner(s) of Record:
2. Zoning Designation:
Roy & Kim Boyer
14609 161st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
and
William & Marilyn Spiry
16023 SE 144th St
Renton, WA 98059
3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation:
Residential -4 du/ac (R-4)
Residential Low Density (RLD)
4. Existing Site Use: Single Family Residential and Nursery
S. Neighborhood Characteristics:
a. North:
b. East:
c. South:
d. West:
SE 144'° St and Single Family Residential (City R-4 zone)
161" Ave SE Single Family Residential (County R-4 zone)
Single Family Residential (County R-4 zone)
160'° Ave SE Single Family Residential (County R-4 zone)
Page 2 of 15
6. Access: Access to the plat would be gained from 160th and 161st Ave SE via new internal
residential streets.
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY Pl
Preliminary Plot Report & Recommendation
WAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015
7. Site Area: 9.64 acres
I D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND:
Action
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
Annexation
i E. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities
Land Use File No.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ordinance No.
5099
5100
5719
a. Water: This site is located in the Water District 90 water service boundary.
Page 3 of 15
11/01/04
11/01/04
08/17/2014
b. Sewer: The site is located in the city of Renton sewer service area. There is a sewer main in SE
144th Street.
c. Surface/Storm Water: There is limited storm conveyance in SE 144th St.
2. Streets: There are no frontage improvements along the site boundary.
3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
b. Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
c. Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards
d. Section 4-2-115: Residential Design and Open Space Standards
2. Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts
a. Section 4-3-050: Critical Areas Regulations
3. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
a. Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
5. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations
6. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria
7. Chapter 11 Definitions
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com, cy & Economic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Land Use Element
2. Transportation Element
3. Community Design Element
II H. FINDINGS OF FACT:
Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUA15-000018, PP, ECF
Page 4 of 15
1. The applicant requested SEPA Environmental Review and Preliminary Plat for a 27-lot subdivision on
January 14, 2015.
2. Several development standards (R-4 lot dimensions, R-4 setbacks, City tree standards, retaining walls,
etc.) became effective January 23, 2015. The proposed application was determined complete on
January 15, 2015 and is therefore vested to the former RMC Title-lV4 development standards (as noted
below in Finding of Fact 25.2). The project complies with the 120-day review period.
3. The subject property is a collection of three parcels located on the south side of SE 144'" St between
160'" and 161" Ave SE.
4. The 9.64 acre site is in the Residential Low Density (RLD) Comprehensive Plan land use designation and
the Residential 4 (R-4) zoning classification.
5. The site currently contains two single family residences, a nursery, and several detached structures all
of which are proposed to be removed.
6. The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre.
7. In addition to the 27 lots, three tracts are proposed for sensitive areas, storm drainage, trees, access,
and open space.
8. In response to preliminary comments from City Staff related to lot orientation and the alignment of the
extension of 160'" Ave SE the applicant submitted a revised plat plan to the City on March 3, 2015
(Exhibit 15).
9. The March 3, 2014 plat plan revises the internal road alignment to place the single tier of lots on the
west side of the plat (proposed Lots 1-8) and the double tier of lots on the east side of the plat (9-16
and 21-27 (Exhibit 15). Additionally, the cul-de-sac in the northern portion of the site has been
relocated to south and proposed Lots 17-20 would be accessed from a 20-foot wide public alley.
10. The revised plat plan continues to include the use of a stormwater tract (Tract 'B') and a Tree Retention
tract (Tract 'C') in the southern portion of the site. The Tree Retention Tract has been revised to include
a soft surface trail connecting 160'" Ave SE to 161" Ave SE.
11. Staff has utilized the revised plat plan dated March 3, 2015 (Exhibit 15) to base its recommendation to
the Hearing Examiner.
12. The proposed lots would range in size from 8,000 square feet to 12,240 square feet with an average lot
size of 8,950 square feet.
13. The following table identifies proposed approximate dimensions for Lots 1-27:
Lot# Lot Size Approx. Approx. Lot# Lot Size Approx. Approx.
(sf) Width Depth (sf) Width Depth
Min: 8,000 SF Min: 70/eet Min: 80/eet Min: 8,000 SF Min: 70/eet Min: BO feet
Lot1 8,000 83/eet 100/eet Lot 15 8,206 70/eet 105 feet
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com ty & Economic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015
Lotz 8,000 80feet 100 feet
Lot 3 8,000 80feet 100 feet
Lot4 8,632 86feet 100 feet
Lot5 8,496 80feet lllfeet
Lot6 8,008 72feet lllfeet
Lot7 8,122 75feet 107 feet
Lot8 9,591 90feet 107 feet
Lot9 11,129 80feet 131feet
Lot10 9,990 80feet 117 feet
Lot 11 8,765 71feet 117 feet
Lot 12 8,441 84 feet 101feet
Lot13 8,215 95 feet 95 feet
Lot14 8,209 84 feet 95 feet
Lot 16
Lot 17
Lot 18
Lot 19
LotZO
LotZl
LotZZ
LotZ3
LotZ4
LotZ5
LotZ6
LotZ7
Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Page 5 of 15
10,190 80feet 131 feet
11,867 70feet 139 feet
12,130 87 feet 139 feet
12,184 87 feet 140feet
12,240 87 feet 141 feet
9,114 80feet 110 feet
8,042 84 feet 95 feet
8,008 83feet 95 feet
8,001 81feet 96feet
8,319 84 feet 110 feet
8,095 71feet 115 feet
8,796 80feet 115 feet
14. Access to the plat would be gained from 160th and 161st Ave SE via new internal residential streets. A
cul-de-sac is proposed in the southern portion of the property. No direct access is proposed from SE
144th St.
15. The applicant is proposing excavation in the amount of approximately 18,590 cubic yards and 14,310
cubic yards of fill. The net export volume is approximately 4,280 cubic yards.
16. There are 598 significant trees on the site of which the applicant is proposing to retain 102 trees.
17. The applicant submitted a conceptual landscape plan which includes the installation of street trees
within a proposed 8-foot planter along the frontages of SE 1441h St, extended portions of 160'h Ave SE
and 161" Ave SE, and the frontage of the internal road (Exhibit 3).
18, The site does not contain critical areas.
19, The site can best be characterized as generally flat which generally descends very gently from 144th Ave
SE south; with an elevation change of approximately 15 feet.
20. A drainage plan and drainage report has been submitted with the application (Exhibit 8). The report
addresses compliance with 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City of Renton Amendments
to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2.
21. Staff received a comment letter from one neighboring property owner (Exhibit 11).
Questions/concerns regarding water quality and access were raised within the letter. No other agency
or public comments have been received.
22, Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended),
on February 23, 2015, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-
Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) for the Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat (Exhibit 14). The DNS-M
included six mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on February 27, 2015 and ended
on March 13, 2015. No appeals of the threshold determination have been filed as of the date of this
report.
23. Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee
(ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated:
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com ,y & Economic Development Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUA15-000018, PP, ECF ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015 Page 6 of 15
1. All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the
recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW, dated June 5,
2014 or an alternate report approved by the City's Plan Reviewer.
2. Additional secondary review is required for the proposed 7-8 foot stormwater pond wall during
the final engineering design which includes hydro-geotechnical evaluations for buoyancy and
lining, structural review and wall drainage relief against potential hydrostatic pressures. The
secondary review shall be conducted by an independent reviewer selected by the City at the
applicant's expense and shall be approved by the City's Plan Reviewer prior to engineering plan
approval.
3. The applicant shall be required to provide, to the Current Planning Project Manager, tree
retention inspection/monitoring reports after initial clearing, final grading, and annually for two
years by a qualified professional forester. The inspection/monitoring reports shall identify any
retained trees that develop problems due to changing site conditions and prescribe mitigation.
4. The applicant shall submit a revised Traffic Study including an analysis of impacts caused by the
proposed development to the 156th Ave SE/SE144th St and the 156th Ave SE/SE 142nd St
intersections and recommend appropriate mitigation as necessary. The revised study shall be
submitted to/approved by the City's Plan Reviewer, and applicable mitigation shall be
incorporated in the proposal, prior to engineering permit approval. The applicant shall also be
responsible for paying their fair share of the cost of a new signal to be installed at the 156th
Avenue SE/SE 142nd St intersection based on any new PM peak hour trips generated from the
subdivision. The fee will be based on new PM peak hour trips/1,310 Total PM peak hour trips x
$500,000 (cost of new signal) and shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat.
24. Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and
address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file,
and the essence of the comments have been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report,
and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report.
25. The proposal requires Preliminary Plat Review. The following table contains project elements intended
to comply with Subdivision Regulations, as outlined in RMC 4-7.
PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW CRITERIA:
1. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The site is designated Residential Low Density (RLD) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposal
is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Element policies if all
conditions of approval are complied with:
Policy LU-151. Density should be a maximum of 4 du/acre on portions of the Residential
,/ Low Density [designated] land where [environmental] constraints are not extensive and
urban densities are appropriate.
Policy LU-157. Within the Residential 4 du/ac zoned area, allow a maximum density of 4
,/ units per net acre to encourage larger lot development and increase the supply of upper
income housing consistent with the City's Housing Element.
Objective CD-A: The City's unique natural features, including land form, vegetation,
,/ lakeshore, river, creeks and streams, and wetlands should be protected and enhanced as
opportunities arise.
Objective CD-C. Promote reinvestment in and upgrade of existing residential
neighborhoods through redevelopment of small, underutilized parcels with infill
,/ development, modification and alteration of older housing stock, and improvements to
streets and sidewalks to increase property values.
,/ Policy T-9. Streets and pedestrian paths in residential neighborhoods should be arranged as
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com, -y & Economic Development Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
WA1S-000018, PP, ECF ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015 Page 7 of 15
an interconnecting network that serves local traffic and facilitates pedestrian circulation.
Z, COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNDERLYING ZONING DESIGNATION:
The site is classified Residential 4 (R-4) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposal is vested to the R4
standards effective on the date of application (see Finding of Fact 2).
RMC 4-2-110A provides development standards for development within the R-4 zoning classification. The
proposal is consistent with the following development standards if all conditions of approval are complied
with or as noted thusly:
Density: The allowed density range in the R-4 zone is a maximum of 4.0 dwelling units per
acre. There is no minimum density requirement.
Staff Comment: The resulting 9.64-acre site is located within the R-4 zoning classification.
,/ After subtracting 124,520 square feet for proposed right-of-way dedications; the net square
footage of the site would be 419,829 square feet (6.78 net acres). The 27 lot proposal would
arrive at a net density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre (27 lots/ 6.78 acres = 3.98 du/ac),
which falls within the permitted density range for the R-4 zone.
lot Dimensions: The minimum lot size permitted in the R-4 zoning designation is 8,000
square feet. A minimum lot width of 70 feet is required for interior lots and 80 feet for
,/ corner lots. lot depth is required to be a minimum of 80 feet.
Staff Comment: As demonstrated in the table above (Finding of Fact 13}, all lots meet the
requirements for minimum lot size, depth, and width as outlined in RMC 4-2-llOA.
Setbacks: Setbacks in the R-4 zone are the following: front yard is 30 feet; a side yard along
the street is 20 feet; interior side yard is 5 feet; the rear yard is 25 feet.
Staff Comment: The proposed lots appear to contain adequate area to provide all the
Compliance required setback areas. Compliance with building setback requirements would be reviewed
not yet at the time of building permit review.
determined The site currently contains two single family residences, a nursery, and several detached
structures all of which are proposed to be removed. Staff recommends, as a condition of
approval that all structures proposed for removal be demolished and all inspections
complete prior to Final Plat approval.
Building Standards: Building height is restricted to 30 feet and 2-stories. Detached
accessory structures must remain below a height of 15 feet and one-story. The allowed
Compliance building lot coverage for lots is 35 percent or 2,500 SF, whichever is greater. The allowed
not yet impervious surface coverage is 55 percent.
determined
Staff Comment: The building standards for the proposed lots would be verified at the time of
building permit review.
landscaping: Ten feet of on-site landscaping is required along all public street frontages,
with the exception of areas for required walkways and driveways per RMC 4-4-070. Such
landscaping shall include a mixture of trees, shrubs, and groundcover as approved by the
Compliance Department of Community and Economic Development
not yet Staff Comment: As proposed, the conceptual landscape plan includes the required 10-foot
determined wide landscaping along all street frontages according, to the original Preliminary Plat Plan
(Exhibit 3}. However, a revised landscape plan was not included to reflect the revised plat
plan submitted on March 3, 2015 (Exhibit 15). A detailed landscaping plan, complying with
RMC 4-4-070, will be required to be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com ty & Economic Development Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUA15-000018, PP, ECF ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015 Page 8 of 15
Project Manager prior to engineering permit approval. A 10-foot landscape frontage is not
required along the frontage of the public alley.
Parking and Loading: Pursuant to RMC 4-4-080 each unit is required to accommodate off
street parking for a minimum of two vehicles. The maximum width of single loaded garage
Compliance
driveways shall not exceed 9 feet and double loaded garage driveways shall not exceed 16
not yet feet.
determined Staff Comment: Sufficient area exists, on each lot, to accommodate off street parking for a
minimum of two vehicles. Compliance with driveway requirements would be reviewed at the
time of building permit review.
3. CRITICAL AREAS: The proposal is consistent with critical area regulations as stated in RMC 4-3-050 if all
conditions of approval are met:
N/A Staff_ Comment: The subject site does not contain critical areas.
4. COMMUNITY ASSETS: The proposal is consistent with the following community asset requirements if all
condition of approval are complied with:
Tree Retention: RMC 4-4-130 states thirty percent of the trees shall be retained in a
residential development.
Staff Comment: The vegetation across the subject site hos been heavily disturbed by nursery
activity, with Douglas fir and bigleof maple representing the canopy that remains onsite.
South of the nursery parcel, the two other lots are dominated by Douglas fir, western red
cedar, and big leaf maple in the canopy, with common occurrences of Douglas fir and Indian
plum in the sub-canopy and Nootka rose in the shrub layer. Herbaceous species found in the
undisturbed forest areas include bracken fern, sword fern and Oregon grape.
The applicant submitted a Tree Arborist Report prepared by Greenforest Incorporated
Consulting Arborist {dated January 5, 2015) (Exhibit 13). There are a total of 598 trees
located on site. The applicant is required to retain 30 percent of the trees located on site
that are not located within critical areas, proposed rights-of-way and access easements. Of
the 598 trees located on site, 260 trees would be excluded from the tree retention
Compliant if requirements. The provided tree retention worksheet indicates 14 trees are considered dead
Conditions of diseased or dangerous, and 246 trees are located within proposed public streets. Therefore,
Approval are the applicant would be required to retain at least 102 trees on site. The applicant has
Met proposed to retain 102 trees thereby complying with Tree Retention requirements of the
code (Exhibit 12). The proposed tree retention plan does not reflect the revised plat plan
submitted on March 3, 2015 (Exhibit 15). A detailed tree retention plan, complying with
RMC 4-4-130, will be required to be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning
Project Manager prior to engineering permit approval.
The provided Tree Retention Report includes a specific recommendation for inspection of
retained trees due to changing site conditions (Exhibit 13}. In order to ensure trees are
protected during construction activities from damage to tree roots, trunks, and branches, a
SEPA mitigation measure was issued, requiring the applicant to provide tree retention
inspection/monitoring reports after initial clearing, final grading, and annually for two years
by a qualified professional forester (Exhibit 14).
In order to ensure the proposed Tree Retention Tract (Tract 'C') is preserved in perpetuity,
staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant establish and record a
permanent and irrevocable deed restriction on the property title of the tree protection tract.
Such deed restriction shall prohibit development, alteration, or disturbance within the tract
HEX Report
City of Renton Department of Com ty & Economic Development Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015 Page 9 of 15
except for the purposes of instolling Administrator opproved omenities or habitat
enhancement activities, as part af an enhancement project, which has received prior written
approval from the City. A covenant shall be placed on the tract restricting its separote sale
and shall be recorded prior ta or concurrent with the recording af the Final Plat.
Additionally, staff recommends as a condition of approval the applicant place permanent
fencing on the perimeter of the tree protection tract. This sholl be occomplished by installing
a wood, split-rail fence with applicoble signoge. The Administrator may approve pedestrian-
sized openings for the purpose of facilitating passive recreation within the tract far the
benefit of the community. The Administrator may authorize alternate styles and/or materials
for the required fencing. The proposed fencing shall be submitted to, and approved by, the
Current Planning Project Manager prior ta engineering permit approval.
It should also be noted that the applicant also provided o conceptuol londscape plan as part
of the Preliminary Plat submittal which included the planting of 100 new trees on site
(Exhibit 3}.
5. COMPLIANCE WITH SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS: RMC 4-7 Provides review criteria for the subdivisions.
The proposal is consistent with the following subdivision regulations if all conditions of approval are
complied with:
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval are
Met
HEX Report
Streets: The proposed street system shall extend and create connections between existing
streets per the Street Standards outlined in RMC 4-6-060 Street Standards.
Staff Comment: The development located on the south side of SE 144'" St between 160'" Ave
SE and 161" Ave SE at 16023 SE 144'" St. The site is within close proximity to King County
Metro Route #111. The nearest public transit stop is located at the northeast corner of the
site at the intersection of SE 144'" St and 161" Ave SE.
Level of Service:
The applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by TraffEx, dated December 31,
2014 (Exhibit 9). The report states that the proposed development would generate
approximately 267 net new daily trips. During the weekday AM peak hour, the project would
generate approximately 21 net new trips (5 inbound and 16 outbound). During the weekday
PM peak hour, the project would generate approximately 28 net new trips (18 inbound and
10 outbound).
The report also analyzed the level of service at the following intersections: 160'" Ave SE/SE
144'" St and 161" Ave SE/SE 144'" St. The traffic study states that these intersections will
continue to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS BJ. The proposed project does not
disclose likely impacts to the intersections of 156'" Ave SE/SE144'" St and 156'" Ave SE/SE
142°" St. As o result a SEPA mitigation measure was issued requiring the applicant submit a
revised Traffic Study, including an analysis of impacts caused by the proposed development
to the 156'" Ave SE/SE144'" St and the 156'" Ave SE/SE 142"d St intersections, and
recommend appropriate mitigation as necessary.
It should be noted that the City's Transportation Division has conducted an independent
study of the existing background traffic situation ot the 156'" Ave SE/SE 142°d St intersection.
Based on the City's study the existing conditions warrant the installation of a traffic signal at
this intersection with or without the construction of the proposed subdivision. With the
instollation of a traffic signol at this intersection, it is onticipated that the traffic conditions in
the project vicinity would improve. The installation of a traffic signal is not included on the
City's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP}, therefore transportation impacts fees
would not fund the installation of a signal. Due to the existing LOS designation 'F' at the
156'" Ave SE/SE 142°d St intersection ond the fact that the required traffic impact fees would
City of Renton Department of Com ty & Economic Development Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015 Page 10 of 15
HEX Report
not fund a traffic signal at this intersection, a SEPA mitigation measure was issued, requiring
the applicant to be responsible for paying their fair share of the cost of a new signal to be
installed at the 156'h Ave SE/SE 142"d St intersection based an any new PM peak hour trips.
The fee will be based on new PM peak hour trips/1,310 Total PM peak hour trips x $500,000
(cost of new signal) and shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat.
Increased traffic created by the development would be mitigated by payment of
transportation impact fees. Currently this fee is assessed at $2,143.70 per new single-family
home. The fee, as determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of building permit
issuance shall be payable to the City.
Frontage Improvements:
All internal and frontage roads ore required to meet street standards pursuant to RMC 4-6-
060. The internal public streets have been proposed with a right-of-way width of 53 feet
which meets the City's complete street requirements for residential access streets.
Pavement width of 26 feet, 0.5 foot wide curbs, 8 foot wide landscaped planters (on both
sides of the street), 5 foot wide sidewalks (on both sides of the street), drainage
improvements, and street lighting are required. The original plat plan did not require any
deviations from the City's street standards (Exhibit 2). However, in response to preliminary
comments related to lot orientation and the alignment of the extension of 160th Ave SE from
City Staff, the applicant submitted a revised plat plan to the City on March 3, 2015 (Exhibit
15).
The revised plat plan includes the realignment of the internal road system to place the single
tier of lots on the west side of the plat (proposed Lots 1-8) and the double tier of lots on the
east side of the plat (Lots 9-16 and 21-27). Additionally, the cul-de-sac in the northern
portion of the site has been relocated to south. Proposed Lots 17-20 would be accessed from
a 21-foot wide access public alley/unnamed road. The revisions necessitate street
modifications from RMC 4-6-060 for proposed 160'h Ave SE and Road 'A' (see discussion
below).
SE 144" St -RMC 4-6-060 would require approximately 15 feet of pavement width, curb,
gutter, 8-foot planter, and a 5-foot sidewalk. The applicant is proposing improvements on
the south side of SE 144'h St in compliance with RMC 4-6-060 which include a dedication of a
30-foot easement which exists along the northern property line.
160'h Ave SE -RMC 4-6-060 requires the extension of 160'h Ave SE to include 20 feet of
pavement width to the face of the curb, 0.5-foot curb, 8-foot wide landscape planter, and a
5-foot wide sidewalk along the east side of the street. The original plan included an
extension of the 160'h Ave SE to the southern property line in the event of future platting to
the south property line (Exhibit 2). However, the existing subdivision abutting the subject
property to the south was constructed in the 1980's and is therefore not likely to be
redeveloped in the near future. There is however, property immediately to the southwest
which has potential to redevelop. As a result, staff's preliminary comments recommended
160'h Ave SE be realigned in manner that would allow for the extension of 160" Ave SE to SE
148'h St and not require dedications from the existing subdivision abutting the property to
the south. The revised plat plan, submitted by the applicant includes a taper/realignment of
160'h Ave SE to eliminate the need for the dedications from the properties abutting to the
south (Exhibit 15). A street modification is needed in order to modify the street cross-section
south of proposed Road 'A' to achieve the realignment. Therefore staff recommends, as a
condition of approval, a street modification be submitted to, and approved by, the Current
Planning Project Manager prior to engineering permit approval for a modification of the
160'h Ave SE street cross section, south of Road 'A', in order to realign the extension of 160'h
City of Renton Department of Com 'ty & Economic Development Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUAlS-aaaa1s, PP, ECF ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015 Page 11 of 15
HEX Report
Ave SE to the west. Staff would be supportive of such a request to the extent a pedestrian
connection is provided from 160'h Ave SE to 161" Ave SE along the southern portion
boundary of the site as well as the revised design being a more desirable alignment to the
City.
It should also be noted a comment letter was received by a neighboring property owner
raising questions regarding the ownership of the unimproved 160'h Ave SE (Exhibit 11).
Currently 30 feet of right-of-way exists west of the site for the northern 660 feet and this
area is not located within on easement. The proposed improvements would require
primarily a 25-35 foot wide right-of-way dedication along the east side of 160'h Ave SE, in
order to construct the required half-street improvements (approximately 35 feet in width).
Following the proposed improvements to 160'h Ave SE, there would still be an unimproved
portion of the right-of-way (approximately 20 feet in width}, west of the proposed
pavement/drive aisle, which would remain unimproved until such time the property on the
west side of 160'h Ave SE develops.
161" Ave SE· Pursuant to RMC 4-6-060, the 161" Ave SE improvement would require 13 feet
of pavement width from the centerline to the face of the curb, 0.5-foot curb, 8-foot wide
landscape planter, and a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the west side of the street. The
applicant is proposing improvements on the west side of 161" Ave SE in compliance with
RMC 4-6-060 which includes a 26 foot wide right-of-way dedication along portions of the
street frontage.
Internal Road Network (Road 'A'. Road 'B'. Alley/Unnamed Road} -RMC 4-6-060 requires a
right-of-way width for residential access streets of 53 feet, to allow for 26 feet of pavement,
5-foot wide sidewalks, 8-foat wide landscape planter strips, and 0.5-foot curbs on both side
of the street. The original plat plan included an internal road network in compliance with
RMC 4-6-060. However, in response to preliminary comments from City Staff, related to lot
orientation and the alignment of the extension of 160th Ave SE the applicant submitted a
revised plat plan to the City on March 3, 2015 (Exhibit 15). The plan maintains the 53-foot
cross section for Road 'B'. However Road 'A' was reduced to a 47-foot wide cross section (20
feet of pavement width to the face of the curb, 0.5 foot curbs, 8-foot wide landscape
planters, and 5-faot wide sidewalks along the both sides of the street). Additionally, a 21-
foot wide public alley/unnamed road has been incorporated into the design to provide rear
access to proposed lots 17-20.
A modification request is necessary in order to reduce the right-of-way cross section from the
53 required width to the proposed 47-faot wide cross section far Road 'A'. Therefore staff
recommends, as a condition of approval, a street modification be submitted to, and
approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager for a modification to reduce the required
right-of-way width of Road 'A' from 53 feet to 47 feet. Staff would be supportive of a
request to reduce the right-of-way width of Road 'A' ta the extent it a/laws for rear access
via the public alley to proposed lots 17-20 and the elimination of curb cuts needed on SE
144'h St.
lighting: Street lighting is required per RMC 4-6-0601. Specifically pedestrian lighting for
sidewalks and pathways shall be installed between intersections along streets and at
intersection corners for residential streets. A lighting plan will be required to be submitted
and approved prior to construction permit approval.
Pedestrian Improvements/linkages: linkages, including sidewalks and pedestrian paths are
required to be provided within and between neighborhoods when they can create a
continuous and interconnected network. As part of the proposed project, sidewalks would be
constructed along an-site roadways which would connect to the existing sidewalk system.
City of Renton Deportment of Com y & Economic Development Pre ary Plot Report & Recommendation
WAlS-000018, PP, ECF ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015 Page 12 of 15
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval are
Met
Compliant if
Conditions of
Approval are
Met
HEX Report
Additionally, the applicant is proposing a pedestrian soft surface trail from the termination
af the 160'hAve SE sidewalk through the proposed Tree Retention Tract (Tract 'C') to 161"
Ave SE. Staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant be required ta record a
public access easement across the proposed soft surface trail extended from the termination
of 1601hAve SE sidewalk, through the proposed Tree Retention Tract (Tract 'C'), to 161" Ave
SE. The easement shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with the recording of the Final
Plat.
See additional discussion under Finding 29. 7, Schools,far safe walking routes ta school.
Concurrency: Staff recommends a transportation concurrency approval based upon a test of
the citywide Transportation Plan, consideration of growth levels included in the LOS-tested
Transportation Plan, payment of a Transportation Mitigation Fee, and an application of site
specific mitigation (Exhibit 16).
Blocks: Blocks shall be deep enough to allow two tiers of lots.
Staff Comment: The width of the subject site (between 160'h Ave SE and 161" Ave SE) limits
the ability of the applicant to provide two sets of two-tier lots. As a result, the original plat
plan included through lots for proposed Lots 9-17 (Exhibit 2). The tier of through lots,
located along 161" Ave SE, created an orientation challenge for City staff given the desire to
preserve the platting pattern in the neighborhood with homes oriented to 161" Ave SE.
Alternatively, the 1601h Ave SE right-of-way can best be characterized as o private road and
would be more desirable far the location of through lots. Through lots with the orientation
of front yards internal to the plat and rear yards oriented to 1601h Ave SE would do mare ta
preserve the existing character of the private road. Staff recommended the shift of Rood 'B',
ta the west, placing the tier of through lats on the west side of the site. On March 3, 2015
the applicant submitted a plat plan revising the internal road alignment to place the single
tier of lots on the west side of the plat (proposed Lots 1-8) and the double tier of lats on the
east side of the plat (9-16 and 21-27) (Exhibit 15). Additionally, the cul-de-sac in the
northern portion of the site has been relocated to south and proposed Lats 17-20 would be
accessed from a 20-faat wide public alley. Staff is in support of the redesigned plat plan if all
conditions of approval are met with respect to access and lat orientation (see discussion
below).
Residential lots: Pursuant to RMC 4-7-170 general requirements and minimum standards
are provided for residential lots.
Access: Access to the plat would be gained from 160th and 161st Ave SE via new internal
residential streets. A cul-de-sac is proposed in the southern portion of the property. No
direct access is proposed from SE 144th St (see additional discussion under Finding 29. 6
Streets). Given the arrangement of the lots and to provide clarity on access to and
orientation of, the lots within the plat staff recommends a condition of approval requiring a
covenant be recorded on the face of the plat restricting vehicular access for proposed Lats
17-20 to the proposed public alley/unnamed road and proposed Lots 1-8, 21-27 from Road
'B'. Additionally, proposed Lots 17-20's front yards and front fa,ade/elevations shall be
oriented ta the north (SE 144 1h St).
Arrangement: Insofar as practical, side lot lines are at right angles to street lines or radial to
curved street lines. The revised plat pion (Exhibit 15) achieves a superior arrangement of
lats/orientation to the public realm if all conditions of approval are met.
Minimum Size/Width: The size, width, and shape of proposed lots meet the minimum area
and width requirements of the R-4 zone if all conditions of approval are met.
City of Renton Department of Com, ty & Economic Development Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUA1S-000018, PP, ECF ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015 Page 13 of 15
Pipestem Lots: Pursuant to RMC 4-11-120 pipestem lots ore defined as a lot not meeting
minimum frontage requirements The proposal does not include the use af pipestem lots.
6. AVAILABILITY AND IMPACT ON PUBLC SERVICES:
,/
Compliant if
Condition of
Approval is
Met
,/
HEX Report
Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to
furnish services ta the proposed development; subject ta the provision of Code required
improvements and fees. A Fire Impact Fee, based on new single family lots, will be required
in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is
payable to the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code. Currently the fee is assessed
at $495.10 per single family residence.
Parks: It is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future demand on
existing City parks and recreational facilities and programs. A Parks Impact Fee, based on
new single family lots, will be required in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts
to City parks and recreational facilities and programs. The fee is payable to the City as
specified by the Renton Municipal Code. Currently the fee is assessed at $1,395.25.
Schools: It is anticipated that the Issaquah School District can accommodate any additional
students generated by this proposal at the following schools: Briarwood Elementary (1.25
miles from the subject site}, Maywood Middle School {0.5 miles from the subject site} and
Liberty High School (1.22 miles from the subject site}. RCW 58.17.110(2} provides that no
subdivision be approved without making a written finding of adequate provisions for safe
walking conditions for students who walk to and from school and/or bus stops. Maywood
Middle is within walking distance of the subject site while Briarwood Elementary and Liberty
High schools would require future students to be transported ta school via bus. The bus stop
for Briarwood Middle school is currently located at 160'h Ave SE and 144'h Ave SE. The bus
stop for Liberty High School is located at SE 144'h ST and 161" Ave SE.
The applicant is proposing to provide street frontage improvements, including sidewalks,
along the south side of the street for the frontage of the property (SE 144'h St}. To the east
of the subject site there are intermittent sidewalks on the south side of the street with
primarily a 6-9 foot shoulder delineated by a fog line. A majority of the possible school walk
route is outside the City of Renton limits and is in the King County jurisdiction. The one
crossing intersection in the City at 161" Ave. SE has a Stop Sign Control, which provides
adequate protection for crossing children. Outside the City along SE 144th St, King County
has installed 20mph School Speed Limit signing with flashing beacons and other warning
signs as well as a crosswalk at the school driveway. No other improvements are necessary at
this time for safe walking routes to school.
A School Impact Fee, based on new single family lots, will also be required in order to
mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to Issaquah School District. The fee is payable to
the City as specified by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of building permit application.
Currently the fee is assessed at $4,560.00 per single family residence.
Storm Water: An adequate drainage system shall be provided for the proper drainage of all
surface water.
Staff Comment: The site is located within the Lower Cedar River drainage basin. Under pre-
developed conditions, site runoff sheet flows south onto neighboring properties to the south.
The applicant submitted o Preliminary Drainage Report prepared by DR Strong, dated
January 12, 2015 (Exhibit 8). Based on the City's flow control mop, this site falls within the
Flow control Duration Standard Forested site conditions area. An Of/site Level One
City of Renton Department of Com ty & Economic Development Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015 Page 14 of 15
HEX Report
Downstream Analysis was included in the provided report. The report states that the runoff
from the proposed project would be collected and conveyed by a catch basin/pipe network to
a detention/wet pond on the southern edge of the developed area. The pond is designed to
infiltrate the 100 -year storm event.
The proposed runoff would then be discharged from the southeast corner of the site into a
proposed conveyance system in 161" Ave SE. The pre-developed and developed runoff flaw
paths converge within;. mile.
Downstream capacity issues hove been observed and the area is considered a nuisance
requiring City maintenance work ond there is potential for the proposal ta aggravate existing
or create new drainage problems. The applicant is proposing to include a pond wall of
approximately 7-8-feet in height. However, due to potential seepage in and out of the pond,
a SEPA mitigation measure was issued requiring additional secondary during final
engineering design that includes hydro-geotechnical evaluations for buoyancy and lining,
structural review and wall drainage relief against potential hydrostatic pressures. The
secondary review shall be conducted by an independent reviewer. Additionally, the applicant
would be required to provide due diligence in the grading and collection of drainage design
during the construction phase so that runoff and erosion does not impact the neighboring
properties which will likely include an evaluation of the overflow route conveyance capacity
as part of the final TIR to ensure adequate capacity exists downstream during a 100-year
event.
Finally, an existing administrative interpretation requires oil proposals maintain up to a 15·
faat vegetated buffer around drainage pond facilities {Exhibit 6). It appears the proposal
includes an adequate landscape buffer along the perimeter af the proposed drainage facility.
The applicant shall be required to create a homeowners' association and maintenance
agreement(s) for the shared utilities, starmwater facilities, and maintenance and
responsibilities for oil shared improvements of this development. A draft of the document(s)
shall be submitted to Current Planning Project Manager far review and approval by the City
Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording of the final plat.
Water and Sanitary Sewer:
The proposed development is within the Water District 90's water service area. Water
availability certificate from the Water District 90 was provided to the City during the land use
application. Approved water plans from the Water District 90 are required ta be provided
during the utility construction pion review.
The site is located in the City of Renton sewer service area. There is sewer main in SE 144th
Street. Extension of an 8-inch sewer main will be required onsite, on 161" Ave SE and 160TH
Ave SE. Plan shows sewer main onsite and 160'" Ave SE only. Extension of sewer main on
161" Ave SE is required.
The Central Plateau Interceptor Special Assessment District {SAD) fee will be applicable on
the project. The SAD fee rate when it was established in 2009 was $351.95 plus interest per
lot. As of 3/25/2015, the SAD fee rate per lot is $456.82 plus additional interest per day of
$0.05111. The SAD fee rate that is current at the time of issuance of the utility construction
permit will be due from the developer at the time the utility construction permit is issued.
City of Renton Department of Com ty & Economic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PRELIMINARY PLAT
Hearing Date: March 24, 2015
II J_ RECOMMENDATIONS:
Pre ary Plat Report & Recommendation
LUA15-000018, PP, ECF
Page 15 of 15
Staff recommends approval of the Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat, as depicted in Exhibit 15, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with the four mitigation measures issued as part of the Determination of
Non-Significance Mitigated, dated February 23, 2015.
Z. All structures proposed for removal shall be demolished and all inspections complete prior to Final Plat
approval.
3. The applicant shall establish and record a permanent and irrevocable deed restriction on the property
title of the tree protection tract. Such deed restriction shall prohibit development, alteration, or
disturbance within the tract except for the purposes of installing Administrator approved amenities or
habitat enhancement activities, as part of an enhancement project, which has received prior written
approval from the City. A covenant shall be placed on the tract restricting its separate sale and shall be
recorded prior to or concurrent with the recording of the Final Plat.
4. The applicant shall place permanent fencing on the perimeter of the tree protection tract. This shall be
accomplished by installing a wood, split-rail fence with applicable signage. The Administrator may
approve pedestrian-sized openings for the purpose of facilitating passive recreation within the tract for
the benefit of the community. The Administrator may authorize alternate styles and/or materials for
the required fencing. The proposed fencing shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current
Planning Project Manager prior to engineering permit approval.
5. A street modification shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager
prior to engineering permit approval for a modification of the 1601h Ave SE street cross section, south of
Road 'A', in order to realign the extension of 1601h Ave SE to the west.
6. A street modification shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Current Planning Project Manager,
prior to engineering permit approval, for a modification to reduce the required right-of-way width of
Road 'A' from 53 feet to 47 feet.
7. The applicant shall be required to record a public access easement across the proposed soft surface
trail extended from the termination of 160thAve SE sidewalk, through the proposed Tree Retention
Tract (Tract 'C'), to 161st Ave SE. The easement shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the
recording of the Final Plat.
8. A covenant shall be recorded on the face of the plat restricting vehicular access for proposed Lots 17-
20 to the proposed public alley/unnamed road and proposed Lots 1-8, 21-27 from Road 'B'.
Additionally, proposed Lots 17-20's front yards and front fa~ade/elevations shall be oriented to the
north (SE 144th St).
9. The applicant shall be required to create a homeowners' association and maintenance agreement(s) for
the shared utilities, stormwater facilities, and maintenance and responsibilities for all shared
improvements of this development. A draft of the document(s) shall be submitted to Current Planning
Project Manager for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the
recording of the final plat.
EXPIRATION PERIODS:
Preliminary Plat Approval expires seven (5) years from the date of approval.
HEX Report
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPl\i r
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
ERC MEETING DATE:
Project Name:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Owner:
Applicant/Contact:
Project Location:
Project Summary:
Site Area:
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
EXHIBIT 1
February 23, 2015
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
LUA15-000018,PP,ECF
Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner
Roy & Kim Boyer; 14609 161" Ave SE; Renton, WA 98059
William & Marilyn Spiry; 16023 SE 1441h St; Renton, WA 98059
Roy & Kim Boyer; 14609 161" Ave SE; Renton, WA 98059
16023 SE 1441h St/14625 161'1 Ave SE
The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and Preliminary Plat
approval for a 27 lot subdivision with three tracts for open space, tree
retention, and drainage. The subject property is a collection of three parcels
located on the south side of SE 1441h St between 1601h Ave SE and 161'1 Ave SE.
The resulting 9.64-acre site is located within the Residential-4 dwelling units per
acre (R-4) zoning classification. The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98
dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes would range from 8,000 square feet to 13,369
square feet. Access to the plat is proposed via an extension of 161 '' Ave SE and
1601h Ave SE. Internal circulation terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern
portion of the property. The southern portion of the site contains grid
connections from 160th to 161st Ave SE aligned with SE 1451h St and SE 1461h
Place. All existing structures on site are proposed to be demolished. There are
598 significant trees on the site of which the applicant is proposing to retain
102 trees. There appear to be no critical areas located on site.
9.64 acres
Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a
Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated {DNS-M).
Project Location Mop
ERCReport
i ..
: I
I i •
xxxx-xxx
I ' . l ___ --.J
' . ' --/ 1'1.1!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I=
l_
I m
1 I 1i 1 ,-i! 1 !I ~ ~ I
I I I •
8
.:!!:!!.:!!.:!!.:!!.:!!.:!!.l!
~g~g;;_i~[;);;.i
o:oco""co:oo:ococo
ff:titifld HHHH ~ HllHll
II:! ~i~i~~~~
u "
--~0:'t,..:.~·.·
S!f•:J;cJ ~ ~,Wi\
Ni1d l:W
'
~t,; , _J. JC. JJ,/J;lN\/:
A2L . IN 1Nlci1v'
' I i i: ' ! ' ! I i ' ,1 ! Iii~ ! "
,,
' . t::J
-----\
r1],NJ, ~:.:: ~ ~ ',·
. [; "" .
' . ~ ' --' "' I' "' ii~~ "
I~~
I :i;
' " .,
I ~
! ~y
,II b :
I ~
' ' ~~i -e ~ •!• i ~~!
0
LUA --0000018 Alpine N , sery
Notes
None
256
0
0 128
WGS_ 1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
256 Feet
City of R-ento n .~·,:
Finance & IT Division
Legend
City and County Boundary
Other
[ ,; C~y o f Renton
Addresses
Parcels
1st Floor
1st Floor
2nd Floor
1st Floor
<1thPr R11i lrl innl':
Information Techno logy · GIS
RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa .gov
2/22/2015
T'i s Mac s a $er t;P.f'er3ted s::::: r: CLtpuL .-.. er" ar nter·w t T:apo,:s ~:~a ar::
s :er ·ch:rcrcc ::.r / Datu a)IC'S :>lat ao~c cv :;ri tris rrdp '"'d.1 or Wd 'J 1·0: be
a,:cvm~, c1.;r"er • :::r ott-C,...N'1f! '"O iab £
THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAV IGATION
.. ..!-Align Environmenta.
Jaunary 4, 2015
Mr. Roy Boyer
14609 161st Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
Entire Document
Available Upon Request
Re: Wetland Evaluation -Alpine Nursery Site, Renton, WA
Dear Mr. Boyer:
This correspondence follows your request that I conduct a preliminary wetland reconnaissance on
the parcels of land located in the southeast comer of the intersection of SE 144"' Street and 160"'
Ave SE. Based on your description of the site, the property under investigation includes the Alpine
Nursery parcel, located to the north, and two residential parcels located immediately to the south.
(See Attached Location and Site Maps).
Data Collection
Prior to visiting the site, online information was obtained using the King County iMap system, the
US Fish and Wildlife Service online National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), and the Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS) online soil mapping utility.
As shown in the Attached iMap photos and National Wetlands Inventory Map, no mapped streams
or wetlands are shown on the site. Similarly, these maps show no streams or wetlands within 500
feet of the site, indicating that no buffers from off-site critical areas would affect this parcel.
Also attached is the NRCS soil report for the site. As described in the soil report, the parcels appear
to be underlain by Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes. This somewhat excessively
drained soil is commonly found on terraces, such as the Renton Highlands in which the site lies.
This soil exhibits a water table depth greater than 80 inches below the soil surface. This map unit is
not typically known to include hydric inclusions, which indicates that wetlands are not typically
present within the map unit.
Fieldwork
Fieldwork was conducted on August 21,2014 using the three-parameter approach identified in the
Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington Manual) (WDOE 1997) and
the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineer, Wetland Delineation ManuaL· Western Mountains, Valleys and
Coast Region (Regional Supplement) (USACE 2010), which are consistent with the Amry Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (ACOE Manual) (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and other
pertinent federal and local guidance (33 CFR 328.3 [a][l-5]).
During a review of the parcel boundary, I walked the perimeter of the property and found no visible
indication of drainage onto, or leaving the site. I observed that the site contains one small
depressional area that is approximately 3 feet deep, 30 feet wide and 50 feet long. The depression
does not drain off of the site, nor does it appear to capture any surface drainage. It appears that this
Bill Granger 14056 180"' Ave SE Rentnn, WA 90859 (206) 790-6132 EXHIBITAS
re 71 .....
Entire Document
vailable Upon Request
Department of Community and Economic Development
Development Services Division
··.• ADMINISTRATIVE POLIC::Y /CODE INTERPRETATION . .. ·· ·. •. .. . ·--... . . •• . . . . . . : . . . ' .. .
MUNICIPAL
CODE SECTIONS:
REFERENCE:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
JUSTIFICATION:
RMC 4-6-030 Drainage (Surface Water) Standards
N/A
Landscaping, fencing, pond slopes, and other standards for stormwater
tracts and easements and ownership and maintenance responsibility for
stormwater facilities.
The current drainage code (RMC 4-6-030) references the current King
County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) for compliance with
stormwater standards. Requirements for landscaping in stormwater
facility tracts are included in Section 5.3.1.1 of the 2009 KCSWDM as
amended by the City of Renton. Section 5.3.1.1 of the KCSWDM restricts
planting in berms that impound water or within 10 feet of any structure.
Requirements for pond geometry and side slopes are listed in Section
5.3.1.1 of the 2009 KCSWDM, as amended by the City of Renton. Adopted
standards allow for the side slopes of an open detention or water quality
treatment facilities (pond, wetpond, stormwater wetland, etc) to be
steeper than 3:1 if a fence is provided along the wall and/or around the
emergency overflow water surface elevation. This standard is resulting in
facilities that are difficult to maintain, expensive in labor and materials
for maintenance, and create a safety hazard to the maintenance crews.
Fencing requirements are also standardized in section 5.3.1.1 of the 2009
KCSWDM, as amended by the City of Renton. A fence is required to
discourage access to the stormwater pond, prevent litter, allow efficient
maintenance, and In consideration of worker and public safety.
Recognizing that requirements for landscaping and tree planting
contribute to the aesthetics and value of new surface water installations
while needing to ensure proper functionality and maintenance of
facilities, both the Department of Public Works and the Department of
Community and Economic Development desire to clarify standards
H:\CEO\Planning\Title IV\Docket\Administrative Policy Code lnterpretation\Cl-3S\< EXHIB1TA6
Earth
Solutions
NWLLc
Gcotcchnical Engineering
Geology
Environmental Scientists
Construction Monitoring
EXHIB1TA7
( Entire Document
1ilable Upon Request
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
ALPINE GARDENS PRELIMINARY PLAT
16023 SOUTHEAST 144TH STREET
RENTON, WASHINGTON
ES-3377
Entire Document
tailable Upon Request
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT
for
ALPINE NURSERY
Preliminary Plat
16023 SE 1441
" Street and 14609/14625 161" Avenue SE Renton, WA
DRS Project No. 14069 ·
Renton File No.
Owner!Applfcant
Roy Boyer
14609 151•1 Ave SE
Seattle, WA 98103
Report Prepared by
ll!kidl
D. R STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc.
620 ?1h Avenue
Kirkland WA 98033
(425) 827-3063
©2015 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
Report Issue Date
January 12, 2015
EXHIBIT~s
( Entire Document
THE ALPINE PLAT
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
CITY OF RENTON
Prepared for
Mr. Roy Boyer
14609 161 91 Ave. SE
Renton, WA 98059
Prepared by
11410 NE 124th St., #590
Kirkland, Washington 98034
Telephone: 425.522.4118
Fax: 425.522.4311
December 31, 2014
'ailable Upon Request
EXHIBITA.9
Entire Document
Available Upon Request
I
January 9, 2015
ES-3377.02
Earth Solutions NW LLC
Mr. Roy Boyer
14609 -161 51 Avenue Southeast
Renton, Washington 98059
Subject: Alpine Nursery -Boyer Properties
Infiltration Evaluation
16023 Southeast 1441h Street
Renton, Washington
Dear Mr. Boyer:
• Ci .,I·, t.ni,.,il · :·->·,·i-·!in;~
• i .(.r1-i" .. ,, '.i-ll) :\\, •11:';-:-,rtj
• f r ,·. I', d)') a1_'1)(,l: '". ·;'ll· (·'.,
As requested, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has prepared this letter summarizing our
findings regarding stormwater infiltration for the subject site.
The subject site is located on the south side of Southeast 144th Street; and east of 160th
Avenue Southeast in Renton. Washington. The site is occupied by two residential structures
and a plant nursery.
The subject site is located in an area in which glacial outwash (geologic map designation, Qgo)
soil has been identified on the geologic maps which ESNW used as a reference prior to the site
exploration.
A representative of ESNW was on-site to observe the subsurface conditions in December of
2014, and January of 2015. ESNW observed the excavation of eight test pits using hand tools,
as well as an excavator and operator, contracted by ESNW, throughout the stormwater pond
footprint in southern portion of the subject site. The test pits were advanced to approximately
13 feet deep into the native soil. ESNW observed poorly graded gravel (Unified Soil
Classification, GP), and well graded gravel (GW) in a dense condition at all three test locations
at the bottom-of-pond elevation. The well graded gravel contained a fines content of about 2.6
percent and 2.3 percent; and a USDA description of Extremely Gravelly Coarse Sand. Please
see the soil logs later in this report for a detailed description of the subsurface conditions.
EPA falling head infiltration testing was performed within the well graded sand and gravel soils
in three of the test pits. The excavations were terminated in the well graded sand and gravel
soils at maximum of 15 feet below existing grade, which equates to a minimum of six feet below
bottom-of-pond elevation. The soil conditions which ESNW observed were consistent with the
geologic map designation of glacial outwash.
No groundwater was observed at the test pits during our fieldwork
January 2015). No confining soil layer was encountered to an elevati
bottom.
ltll"l.S -136th Plac_e .,.L Suit€ 20'! • Bc_~l!evue, W/i.. 98005 • (42.Sl 449-4704 •
(December 2014 and
EXH1B1TA10
), i
I I {'i
!~ I I
I
' I
'~ '
I
I
I
I
I
I '"" I ~ I '"" ~ I ..:
I
....
~ I ca ....
' I
I :c i
~ ~
I
X
X
X
X
I
X
X
X
-
l >-
"' E w u,
! "' ::, z
w z a:
~ <
! mrr RDE'NTJON CJILajna.is ~
'·--··-· m I : ~"#.k!:~~ _,, tt ! • .,._.,_.,, ___ •
i"""""""""""'""....,"""""" • 1:,:~ .. -"_ :::.""" .. ...... >D .... ,_,,_,,. ,..,
........,,,..,.,_.,...,_.' I
_J
7E:SC L£G£ND
~:""&~~)#fil-"
X >< "" •• -~-
00-···-
l ··-.. "·-·" """_,.,_,)
\ I I
I
-.J
I ·~--...l. ------J
"" ' '··'-.J
, .. , ............
i
I
I
I I . I'll ,ry~~i.. ... _ I I
I
i; ,,.;
I
-----j I
I
I
I ~-' "S\\.i~ )'~'-.. I ..
I
I . 11 r,-Wi . I i -\ 1$ I. • ., .... es
1
.1 : ·r · · . I I '
/e; I '¢,/fX '*3
--;'.'
~
eo11-.o.,.-. .... D11
811 --1..oodm>O... --~ mm D.R 8"""'°
~~~ .,,,.~-----------a-.-~'
Nf: 1/4 Sf:CllON 2J, TO'MISHIP 2J N, RANGE: 5 E,
-ALPINE NURSERY
W.M.
I
L-. ---_J , I
I /,, I
I
'
I /! \
I
I
·!
) ~-) ---·-
13
I
~
4
j" ~-
r-:::_;..:::.:-1
EXHIB1TA12
I j: l
J ;/ ' ~-
"' "' "' -~
/ _ _.,
/
@
NORTH
c;,w.ocsc,;.r
~ ..
ALPINE NURSERY ~ Cl"TY OF PRELIMINARY PLAT
TI!EE ~ ANO LANJ Cl.EARN3 Pl.AN RENTON
"'"'"'•"9/8"aa,.,.JP,.,b0,c w,,., O.pt.
January 5, 2015
Maher Joudi
Greenforest Incorporated
D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc.
620 ?'h Avenue
Kirkland, WA 98033
RE: Alpine Tree Inspection, 16023 SE 1441h Street, Renton WA 98059
Dear Mr. Joudi:
You contacted me and contracted my services as a consulting arborist. My assignment is to inspect
and evaluate the condition of surveyed trees at the above referenced site. I received a tree survey
from you showing the location and numbers of the significant trees. I visited the site last week and
inspected the trees indicated on the sheet, which are the subject of this report.
TREE INSPECTION
My inspection is limited to visual observation from the subject parcels. Some trees, both off site, and
within existing and proposed rights-of-way, are also included in this report.
I identified the species and confirmed trunk diameter (DBH} for the surveyed trees. I also identified
individual trees that are dead, dying, defective or dangerous. You identified specific trees to be saved
and retained. For these trees, I further evaluated health and structure, recorded visible defects and
calculated limits of disturbance. The results of this inspection are based on what is visible at the time
of the inspection.
4547 South Lucile Street, Seattle, WA 98118 EXHI8IT,1s13
rrr Entire Document
Available Upon Request Citv
February 26, 2015 Community & Economic Development Department
CE."Chip"Vincent, Administrator
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL {SEPA) THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following
project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on February 23, 2015:
SEPA DETERMINATION:
PROJECT NAME:
Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNSM)
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
PROJECT NUMBER: LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00
p.m. on March 13, 2015, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are
governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be
obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete
details. If you have questions, please call me at {425) 430-7219.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Rocale Timmons
Senior Planner
Enclosure
cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division
Boyd Powerst Department of Natural Resources
Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Melissa Calvert, Muckles.hoot Cultural Resources Program
Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation
Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region
Larry Fisher, WDFW
Duwarnish Trlbal Office
US Army Corp. of Engineers
EXHIBIT 14
Renton City Hall • I 055 South Grady Way , Renton, Washingtor
i i ",:---c;-)
\
xxxx-xxx
I< ---·--\ t:;,ll>
I ~I~
! I
A~3S~nN 3NldlY
I 'l 6':
~ "
-----0 :
"-
~--~-r-------\
I , I ·1 . I
f
_J
1-
i
I
I
I
I
I=
I
l
I
I r
I
i
L
1-
1
I
>-~~ ~ ~~ w~.
:Q>-~ ~~! g
w~ ts z:;!~ ~ ~ciii3 0 <[:[E f
~
)i! ,i !l _i J
Ln ....
I-....
~
1-1
I ::c >< I w
~! (!)~: r· i,
-~ ! ·1
~§ I I! ~ • I
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 17, 2015
TO: Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Steve Lee, Development Engineering Manager ~~~
Traffic Concurrency Test -The Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat;
File No. LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF
The Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat is a proposed 27 lot subdivision on 9.64 acres. The subject
property is roughly rectangular in shape and is a currently a collection of three parcels on the
south side of SE 144th St between 160th and 161'' Ave SE. The site is located on Residential-4
dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning classification. The current use of the parcels contains two
single family residences, a garden nursery, and several detached structures. The site is
surrounded by existing single family subdivisions zoned R-4 within the City limits and
Unincorporated King County.
The Traffic Analysis prepared by TraffEx (dated December 31, 2014) included information that
the net new peak hour trips generated by the project will be 21 in the weekday AM peak hour
and 28 net new trips in the PM peak hour with a total of 267 net new daily trips. This project
passes the City of Renton Traffic Concurrency Test per RMC 4-6-070.D as follows:
Traffic Concurrency Test Criteria Pass
Implementation of citywide Transportation Plan Yes
Within allowed growth levels Yes
Project subject to transportation mitigation or impact fees Yes
Site specific street improvements to be completed by project Yes
Traffic Concurrency Test Passes
EXHIBIT 16
Transportation Concurrency Test -Storage One on 4th Expansion
Page 2 of 3
March 17, 2015
Evaluation of Test Criteria
Implementation of citywide Transportation Plan: As shown on the attached citywide traffic
concurrency summary, the city's investment in completion of the forecast traffic improvements
are at 130% of the scheduled expenditure through 2014.
Within allowed growth levels: As shown on the attached citywide traffic concurrency summary,
the calculated citywide trip capacity for concurrency with the city adopted model for 2014 is
94,476 trips, which provides sufficient capacity to accommodate the 267 additional trips from
this project. A resulting 94,209 trips are remaining.
Project subject to transportation mitigation or impact fees: The project will be subject to
transportation impact fees at time of building permit for each new single family residence. The
TraffEx report also provided a 'Traffic Mitigation Requirements' on page 4 that does not fully
comply with the adopted composite of development fees found in Section XI of Resolution No.
4164 and Ordinance 5670.
Site specific street improvements to be completed by project: The project will be required to
complete all internal and frontage street improvements for the plat prior to recording. Any
additional off-site improvements identified through SEPA or land use approval will also be
completed prior to final occupancy.
Background Information on Traffic Concurrency Test for Renton
The City of Renton Traffic Concurrency requirements for proposed development projects are
covered under Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-6-070. The specific concurrency test
requirement is covered in RMC 4-6-070.D, which is listed for reference:
D. CONCURRENCY REVIEW PROCESS:
l. Test Required: A concurrency test shall be conducted by the Department for each
nonexempt development activity. The concurrency test shall determine consistency with
the adopted Citywide Level of Service Index and Concurrency Management System
established in the Transportation Element of the Renton Comprehensive Plan, according
to rules and procedures established by the Department. The Department shall issue an
initial concurrency test result describing the outcome of the concurrency test.
2. Written Finding Required: Prior to approval of any nonexempt development activity
permit application, a written finding of concurrency shall be made by the City as part of
the development permit approval. The finding of concurrency sholl be made by the
decision moker with the authority to approve the accompanying development permits
required for a development activity. A written finding of concurrency shall apply only to
the specific land uses, densities, intensities, and development project described in the
application and development permit.
Transportation Concurrency Test -Storage One on 4th Expansion
Page2of3
March 17, 2015
Evaluation of Test Criteria
Implementation of citywide Transportation Plan: As shown on the attached citywide traffic
concurrency summary, the city's investment in completion of the forecast traffic improvements
are at 130% of the scheduled expenditure through 2014.
Within allowed growth levels: As shown on the attached citywide traffic concurrency summary,
the calculated citywide trip capacity for concurrency with the city adopted model for 2014 is
94,476 trips, which provides sufficient capacity to accommodate the 267 additional trips from
this project. A resulting 94,209 trips are remaining.
Project subject to transportation mitigation or impact fees: The project will be subject to
transportation impact fees at time of building permit for each new single family residence. The
TraffEx report also provided a 'Traffic Mitigation Requirements' on page 4 that does not fully
comply with the adopted composite of development fees found in Section XI of Resolution No.
4164 and Ordinance 5670.
Site specific street improvements to be completed by project: The project will be required to
complete all internal and frontage street improvements for the plat prior to recording. Any
additional off-site improvements identified through SEPA or land use approval will also be
completed prior to final occupancy.
Background Information on Traffic Concurrency Test for Renton
The City of Renton Traffic Concurrency requirements for proposed development projects are
covered under Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-6-070. The specific concurrency test
requirement is covered in RMC 4-6-070.D, which is listed for reference:
D. CONCURRENCY REVIEW PROCESS:
1. Test Required: A concurrency test shall be conducted by the Department for each
nonexempt development activity. The concurrency test shall determine consistency with
the adopted Citywide Level of Service Index and Concurrency Management System
established in the Transportation Element of the Renton Comprehensive Plan, according
to rules and procedures established by the Department. The Department shall issue an
initial concurrency test result describing the outcome of the concurrency test.
Z. Written Finding Required: Prior to approval af any nonexempt development activity
permit application, a written finding of concurrency shall be mode by the City as part of
the development permit approval. The finding of concurrency shall be made by the
decision maker with the authority to approve the accompanying development permits
required for a development activity. A written finding of concurrency shall apply only to
the specific land uses, densities, intensities, and development project described in the
application and development permit.
Transportation Concurrency Test -Jtorage One on 4th Expansion
Page 3 of3
March 17, 2015
3. Failure of Test: If no reconsideration is requested, or if upon reconsideration o project
fails the concurrency test, the project application sho/1 be denied by the decision maker
with the authority to approve the accompanying development activity permit
application.
The Concurrency Management System established in the Transportation Element on page Xl-65
of the Comprehensive Plan states the following:
Based upon the test of the citywide Transportation Plan, consideration of growth levels
included in the LOS-tested Transportation Plan, payment of a Transportation Mitigation
Fee, and an application of site specific mitigation, development will have met City of
Renton concurrency requirements.
STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING }
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
PUBLIC NOTICE
Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal
Advertising Representative of the
Renton Reporter
a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of
general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months
prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in
the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King
County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as
a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of
Washington for King County.
The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues
of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was
regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.
The annexed notice, a:
Public Notice
was published on February 27, 2015.
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is
the sum of $112.00.
/
///"~ ,,::i;7 ,?i? ,:,c>·L
vtinda M. Mills
Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter
Subscribed and sworn to me this 27th day of February, 2015.
Kc/!/ lu· i II-LU -
Kathleen C. Sherman, Notary Public for the State of Washington,
Residing in Buckley, Washington
,'.;",:;·
~. '-·~·:
~ ,,
... ~···, -'-,".,~:. ·-~ f"
·. ,;;,C: .
·~,:~;,, '·\{ F ~
-':,,,,,/; .i/'.}1\'.>:'-.. .-, .. ~
. I\\ . ·; ' . .,·,'\
.,.'.
NOTICE OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW COMMITTEE
AND PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review
Committee has issued a Determi-
nation of Non-Significance Miti-
gated (DNS-M) for the following
project under the authority of the
Renton municipal code.
Alpine Nursery Preliminary
Plat, 15-000018, ECF, PP
Location l 6000 block of SE
I 14th Street The applicant is re-
questing SEPA & Preliminary
Plat approval for a 27 Jot subdi-
vision with three tracts. The
9. 64-acre site is located within
the Residential-4 dwelling units
per acre (R-4) zoning classifica-
tion. The 27 lots would result in
a density of 3.98. Access to the
plat is proposed via an extension
of 161st Ave SE and a partial
extension of 160th Ave SE.
There appears to be no critical
areas located on site
Appeals of the DNS-M must
be filed in writing on or befol'f
5:00 p.m. on March 13, 2015.
Appeals must be filed in Miting
together with the required fee
with: Hearing Examiner c/o City
Clerk, City of Renton, l 055 S
Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057
Appeals to the Hearing Examiner
are governed by RMC 4-8-110
and more information may be
obtained from the Renton City
Clerk's Office, 425-430-6510
A Public Hearing will be held by
the Hearing Examiner in the
Council Chambers. City Hall, on
March 24, 2015 at 11:00 am to
consider the submitted applica-
tion. If the DNS-M is appealed,
the appeal will be heard as part
of this public hearing. Interested
parties are invited to attend the
public hearing.
Published in the Renton Reporter
on February 27, 2015.#1255857
OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE -Mm GATED (DNS-M)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PEF!SONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PAOIECT NAM!: Alplno N~IHF'f Prollml~•rv Plat
PRDJtCT MUM8ER: WAlS-00001&, £CF, PP
LDCATIDII: l&DUSlll4'1"'5T/141i:t5lU"All'ESll
DESCRIPTION: THf APPI.JCA/IIT IS Rl'.[lUBTING W'lt. ENVIRONMENTAi llflllEW ANO
PRWMlNAA'I Pl.AT APPAOVM. fOA It. 27 LaT SUIIDM!ilON W1TII THRl'.E TIIACTS FOIi OPEN SPlt.Cf,. TREE
RE1EN110N, ANO ORAIJIAGE. THE SUIIJKT PIIOf'HTV IS It. COL1ECTION OF THREE PMCt:L5 I.DCATW Dfl THE
SCH.11li $!OE OF SE HI'" ST HTWEfN I'°" A\/'E SE AND 161.,. AVE 5l. THE Rt5UlTIN6 9.&oW.CII.E SITl IS 1.0tATUI
WITHIN THt RUIDENTIAl-4 DWEIUW UNITS PH ACRIE 111-t) ZONING tl,USIFICATION. Tl<E 21 (OTS WDULJJ
ll~T IN A DENSITT OF 3.98 OWUUNG Ullln PH ACIIE. LOT SIZU WCU\D RANGE FA0M I.ID) 5Ql/AIIE FElT
TO U,§9 SQUARE FUT. ACC£5$ TD THl PLAT IS P~DPOUDVIA AN l:XnHSION OF lH" AVES( ANO !&D"' A\11!
St. INlUNAI. OROJLATH:IN Tf.llMINAltS IN A CUL-OU~ 1N THE NOATHEIIII PORTION Ol'THE PIIOPtRTI'. THE
so1.mm1N POIITION OfTHE SITf. CONTAIN! GIIID CONNKTlotlS FROM 160TH TO l&IST AYf SE ALIGNED WITH
Sf 1u"' ST ,I.HD SE 11&"' l'I.Att. "-I.I. UISTING STKUa\JRES ON SITE ARE PIIOf'OSED TO I( DU ... Dll5HEO. THERE
ME S911 5IGNIFICANT TRW ON THE sm: OF WH!Ctt THE APPi.JC/i.NT 15 pROf'OSING TO RETAIN 10Z TRE6. TMERE
APP[AII TO Bf: NO CIIIT1CAIAllfA5 lOCATf.O ON SITr.
Tl+E OTY OF R<NTON ENV,RONMENTAL RE\'lEW COMMITTEE (ERCI HA5 DETERMINED THAT THE PRO!'OSED
ACTION HAS PIIOBABLf S!GMIHCANT IMPAm TIM.T CAN BE MmGATEO THROUGH MITIGATIOM MEASU~ES.
Ap,uil of the t,wlronnu,nta,I datarmlAitlOII mllSt b• fll•d in writln1 °" ar bafnn 5:00 p.m. an March U,
2015, to1.ihar with tlM requtrl'II IH with: HliH1n1 Exlndn•r, Cit\' ol Rornton, 1055 Soutll Grady Way,
Renton, WA 99057. Appo•ls to tha Examlnar an 10..,.mecl by City ot RMC 4-5-llD and llllonutlon
r•prdln1 the apjMOI proam may bit obtained tram Iha R•ntan CftV Oort<', Offlai, {4:Z.SI UD-6510.
A PUBLIC HEAFIIMG WILL BE HELD SY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMlt.ER AT HIS REGULAR MEml<IG IN THE
COUNaL CHAMBEl!S ON THE 7TH fLOOR OF CITY HAL1, 10SS SOUTH GRADV WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON,
ON MARCH 24, 2015 AT 11:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE PIIELIMINAR'I' PLAT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILi.BE HEARD AS PARTOFTHIS PUBLIC HEARING.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE OTY OF RENTON, OEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC OEVELOPMEITT AT {425) 430-7200,
!; t 00 NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTiiORIZATION n s \ a rG-£-1... PLEASE INCLUDE 11-IE PflOJECT NUMBER WHEN CAWNG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION.
I, ~ . --.-·-· -· •. 1e above document
were posted in + conspicuous places or nearby the escribed property on
2_/7-=J-/;S Signed:~ I I ~ Date: <
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ss
COUNTY OF KING
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Kl',> Stic·,,s,,.,
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
blic in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print):
My appointment expires: __ ~A......,., c"t_j""i'~.s .... :+-"':i.~",.,.~ -'."'-)_.Cc,., I_Jj _____ _
On the 27th day of February, 2015, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing
SEPA Notice and Determination documents. This information was sent to:
Agencies See Attached
Roy and Kim Boyer Applicant
William & Mary Spiry Owner
Kim Smith Owner
Steve Lyman Party of Record
Maher Joudi Party of Record
Tim and Linda Corner Party of Record
(Signature of Sender):
.,,\\\\\'11
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ;.._\.. Y P()1, )..0 ............. "\\\\111, ,.,. J/~
) SS '<. :0,."''\11SIO., i•,,,'1? ..
COUNTY OF KING ) §o~.01 .... ~I\ 1./l ·~ .::CJ ",J.. ~ :::. ~ ... .. .... I ~
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante ,_':a\ '°<r11,.\C> J ;if: j
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act tor; ~~~.i;pises
mentioned in the instrument. · ... o.t' w~";1-1,~0 1,.,,,
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
15-000018, ECF, PP
template -affidavit of service by mailing
Dept. of Ecology ••
Environmental Review Section
PO Box47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region •
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers •
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Boyd Powers • **
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Serv.
Attn: SEPA Section
35030 SE Douglas St. #210
Snoqualmie, WA 98065
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Seattle Public Utilities
Jailaine Madura
Attn: SEPA Coordinator
700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900
PO Box34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
AGENCY (DOE) LETIER MAILING
{ERC DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Larry Fisher*
1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201
Issaquah, WA 98027
Duwamish Tribal Office*
4717 W Marginal Way SW
Seattle, WA 98106-1514
KC Wastewater Treatment Division •
Environmental Planning Supervisor
Ms. Shirley Marroquin
201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
City of Newcastle
Attn: Tim McHarg
Director of Community Development
1283S Newcastle Way, Ste 200
Newcastle, WA 98056
Puget Sound Energy
Kathy Johnson,
355 110'' Ave NE
Mailstop EST llW
Bellevue, WA 98004
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.*
Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
39015 -172nd Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program •
Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
39015172'' Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation•
Attn: Gretchen Kaehler
PO Box48343
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
City of Kent
Attn: Jack Pace
Acting Community Dev. Director
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
City of Tukwila
Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
*Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS" 1 the marked agencies and cities
will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of
Application .
.. Department of Ecology Is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to
the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov
***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT,
& Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov
template -affidavit of service by mailing
Rov and Kim Baver
14609 161st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Maher Joudi
D.R. Strong Consulting Eng.
620 7th Ave
Kirkland, WA 98033
Steve Lvman
14505 160th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Tim & Linda Corner
14611160th Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
William and Marv Spirv
16023 SE 144th St
Renton, WA 98059
Kim Smith
14609 161st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
·"""""""---Denis Law ..... : ·. • City of.
-----~M:a:yo:, ___ ............... r J l
February 16, 2015
Tim and Linda Corner
146111601h Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
_!,~ d)l§~ll
Community & Economic Development Department
C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator
SUBJECT: ALPINE NURSERY PP COMMENT RESPONSE LETIER
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Corner:
Thank you for your comments related to the Alpine Nursery; dated January 20, 2015.
This letter will be added to the public record for consideration by the reviewing official
and you have been added as a party of record.
As a matter of clarification the applicant is proposing to dedicate a portion of their
property in order to construct a half street (which includes two driving lanes} for 161'1
Ave SE (please see highlighted plat plan attached}. It also appears the abutting 30-feet
to the west was conveyed to King County by dedication (Recording No. 9109130494). It
is unclear what private street you are referencing so I am unable verify whether or not
the proposed 1601h Ave SE access will impact your private street.
Thank you for interest in this project and if you have any further questions please feel
free to contact me at 425-430-7219 or rtimmons@rentonwa.gov. Thank you.
~~~
;;~~·r Planner
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
February 27, 2015
Roy & Kim Boyer
14609 161 st Ave SE
Renton,VVA 98059
Community & Economic Development Department
C.E."Chi p"Vi ncent, Administrator
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat, LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
Dear M/M Boyer:
This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise
you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a
threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures.
Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report, for a list of the Mitigation Measures.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00
p.m. on March 13, 2015, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady VVay, Renton, \AJA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are
governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be
obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
Also, a public hearing has been scheduled by the Hearing Examiner in the Council
Chambers on the seventh floor of City Hall on March 24, 2015 at 11:00 AM to consider
the preliminary plat. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to
be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff recommendation will be mailed to
you prior to the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal
will be heard as part of this public hearing.
If you have any further questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
Roy & Kim Boyer
Page 2 of2
February 27, 2015
Rocale Timmons
Senior Planner
Enclosure
•
cc: William & Marilyn Spiry, Kim Smith/ Owner(s)
Steve Lyman, Maher Joudi, Tim & Linda Corner/ Party(ies) of Record
Denis Law
Mayor City o l r
t ·-µrrru· r1
February 26, 2015 Community & Economic Development Department
CE."Chip"Vincent, Administrator
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following
project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on February 23, 2015:
SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNSM)
PROJECT NAME: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
PROJECT NUMBER: LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00
p.m. on March 13, 2015, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are
governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be
obtained from the City Clerk's Office, {425) 430-6510.
Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete
details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Rocale Timmons
Senior Planner
Enclosure
cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division
Boyd Powers1 Department of Natural Resources
Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Melissa Calvert1 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program
Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation
Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region
Larry Fisher, WDFW
Duwamish Tribal Office
US Army Corp. of Engineers
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN11 Y
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
PROJECT NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT NAME:
-MITIGATED (DNS-M)
LUA15-000018, ECF, SHPL-A
Roy & Kim Boyer
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and Preliminary
Plat approval for a 27 lot subdivision with three tracts for open space, tree retention, and drainage. The subject
property is a collection of three parcels located on the south side of SE 144th St between 160th Ave SE and
161st Ave SE. The resulting 9.64-acre site is located within the Residential-4 dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning
classification. The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes would range from
8,000 square feet to 13,369 square feet. Access to the plat is proposed via an extension of 161st Ave SE and
160th Ave SE. Internal circulation terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern portion of the property. The
southern portion of the site contains grid connections from 160th to 161st Ave SE aligned with SE 145th St and
SE 146th Place. All existing structures on site are proposed to be demolished. There are 598 significant trees on
the site of which the applicant is proposing to retain 102 trees. There appear to be no critical areas located on
site.
PROJECT LOCATION:
LEAD AGENCY:
16023 SE 1441h St/14625 161" Ave SE
City of Renton
Environmental Review Committee
Department of Community & Economic Development
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under
their authority of Section 4-9-0700 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental
impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the
lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 13, 2015.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South
Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be
obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
PUBLICATION DATE: February 27, 2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUl\111 V
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF DECISION:
SIGNATURES:
Terry Higashiyama, Administrator
Community Services Department
FEBRUARY 23, 2015
'} _ / ;J <? J '~~ --+-'/C ~_____'.!______-~ Mark Peterson, dministrator
Date & ~,:~\7'.'""" ~~
Date
Ll."C~ip'~vintent, Administrator
Department of Community &
Economic Development
I.
2,/2-~ /,s-
Date
DEPARTMENT OF CO 1UNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNSM)
MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES
PROJECT NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT NAME:
LUA15-000018, ECF, PP
Roy & Kim Boyer; 14609 161'1 Ave SE, Renton, WA 98059
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review
and Preliminary Plat approval for a 27 lot subdivision with three tracts for open space, tree
retention, and drainage. The subject property is a collection of three parcels located on the
south side of SE 1441h St between 1601h Ave SE and 16151 Ave SE. The resulting 9.64-acre site is
located within the Residential-4 dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning classification. The 27 lots
would result in a density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes would range from 8,000
square feet to 13,369 square feet. Access to the plat is proposed via an extension of 16151 Ave
SE and 160'h Ave SE. Internal circulation terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern portion of
the property. The southern portion of the site contains grid connections from 160th to 161st
Ave SE aligned with SE 1451h St and SE 146th Place. All existing structures on site are proposed
to be demolished. There are 598 significant trees on the site of which the applicant is proposing
to retain 102 trees. There appear to be no critical areas located on site.
PROJECT LOCATION:
LEAD AGENCY:
MITIGATION MEASURES:
16023 SE 144th St/ 14625 16151 Ave SE
The City of Renton
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division
1. All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the
recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW, dated
June 5, 2014 or an alternate report approved by the City's Plan Reviewer.
2. Additional secondary review is required for the proposed 7-8 foot stormwater pond wall
during the final engineering design which includes hydro-geotechnical evaluations for
buoyancy and lining, structural review and wall drainage relief against potential
hydrostatic pressures. The secondary review shall be conducted by an independent
reviewer selected by the City at the applicant's expense and shall be approved by the
City's Plan Reviewer prior to engineering plan approval.
3. The applicant shall be required to provide, to the Current Planning Project Manager, tree
retention inspection/monitoring reports after initial clearing, final grading, and annually
for two years by a qualified professional forester. The inspection/monitoring reports
shall identify any retained trees that develop problems due to changing site conditions
and prescribe mitigation.
4. The applicant shall submit a revised Traffic Study including an analysis of impacts caused
by the proposed development to the 156th Ave SE/SE144th St and the 156th Avenue
SE/SE 142nd Street intersections and recommend appropriate mitigation as necessary.
The revised study shall be submitted to/approved by the City's Plan Reviewer, and
applicable mitigation shall be incorporated in the proposal, prior to engineering permit
approval. The applicant shall also be responsible for paying their fair share of the cost of
a new signal to be installed at the 156th Avenue SE/SE 142nd Street intersection based
on any new PM peak hour trips generated from the subdivision. The fee will be based on
new PM peak hour trips/1,310 Total PM peak hour trips x $500,000 (cost of new signal)
and shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat.
ADIVISORY NOTES:
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the
administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are
not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions.
Community Services Review Comments Leslie Betlach I 425-430-6619 I
LBetlach@rentonwa.gov
Recommendations:
1. Parks Impact fee per ordinance 5670 applies.
2. On SE 144 Street-do not use Cercidophyllum japonicum on SE 144 Street due to overhead
electric lines. Use a small maturing species-suggest Paperbark Maple (Acergriseum)-single
stem, 1 terminal leader, specimen grade.
3. Quercus coccinea-do not use any Oak species or nut producing trees Suggest Sterling
Linden (Tilia tomentosa
4. Road B-change species from Lot 27 and Lot 9 to 161 Avenue SE a total of 8 trees.
5. Road A-change species. Between lots 4 and 23-either eliminate tree or use a small
maturing species-space is too small for a large maturing tree.
6. Street trees shall not be planted closer than 40 feet from stop signs, 30 feet from street
lights, 6 feet from side water/sewer service and fire hydrants, not closer than 10 feet from
driveways.
Plan -Planning Review Version 1 I February 18, 2015
Engineering Review Comments Kamran Yazdidoost I 425-430-7382 I
kyazdidoost@rentonwa.gov
Recommendations: I have reviewed the application for the alpine Plat generally located
between 160TH Ave SE and 161st Ave SE south side of SE 144TH Street and have the following
comments:
EXISTING CONDITIONS
WATER: Water service will be provided by the Water District 90.
ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 2 of 8
SEWER:
STORM:
Sewer service will be provided by the City of Renton.
There is limited storm conveyance in SE 144th Street.
STREETS: There are no frontage improvements.
CODE REQUIREMENTS
WATER
1. Water service will be provided by Water District 90. A Water Availability Certificate is
required.
SANITARY SEWER
1. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. There is sewer main in SE 144th Street.
Extension of an 8 inch sewer main will be required onsite, on 161st Ave SE and 160TH Ave SE.
Plan shows sewer main onsite and 160TH Ave SE only. Extension of sewer main on 161ST Ave
SE is required.
2. System development fee for sewer is based on the size of the new domestic water that will
serve each new lot. Sewer fee for a¥. inch water or 1 inch meter install is $2,135.00.
3. All plats shall provide separate side sewer stubs to each building lot prior to recording of the
plat.
SURFACE WATER
1. A drainage plan and drainage report dated January 12, 2015 was submitted by D.R. Strong
Consulting Engineers. The proposed 27 lot subdivision, zoned R 4, is subject to Full Drainage
Review in accordance with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and City of Renton
Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapters 1 and 2. The 9.64 acre site is located within the Lower
Cedar River basin. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Flow Control
Duration Standard, Forested Condition. Flow control facility sized to match the flow duration
for forested site condition. Basic water quality will be provided using a Storm Filter system.
Surface water runoff created by this development will be collected through a series of new
catch basins and pipe systems in the new roadways and conveyed to an infiltration pond (Tract
B) located at the southeast corner of the site. The pond is designed to infiltrate the 100 -year
storm event.
The project is subject to a Level 2 downstream analysis for a Y. mile from the project site, in
accordance of section 1.2.2.1 ofthe King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by
the City of Renton. Downstream capacity issues have been observed and the area is considered
a nuisance requiring City maintenance work. The Level 2 downstream analysis may require
additional offsite mitigation work or an increase flow control to a Level 3.
2. Appropriate individual lot flow control BM Ps are required to mitigate 10% (approximately
500 600 square feet) of the area of each lot. Infiltration BMPs are proposed in the TIR.
3. A geotechnical report, dated January S, 2015 was submitted by Earth Solutions NW. The field
study included seven exploration pits on
ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 3 of 8
the 9.64 acre site. These exploration pits were dug up to 11 feet in native's soil. No ground
water was encountered. Soil type encountered is glacial outwash. A geotechnical letter, dated
January 9, 2015 was submitted by earth solution NW. The field study included eight test pits at
locations within tract Band the potential infiltration areas. An EPA falling head infiltration test
was performed by Earth Solution NW LLC within the well graded sand and gravel soils in three
of the test pits. The measured infiltration rates were 70 in/hour within the undisturbed native
soils.
4. Surface water system development fee is $1,350.00 per new lot. Fees are payable prior
to issuance of the construction permit.
5. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology will be required. A
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this site.
TRANSPORTATION/STREET
1. The current transportation impact fee rate is $2,214.44 per new single family home. The
transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit application will be
levied. Payment of the transportation impact fee is due at the time of issuance of the building
permit.
2. A traffic analysis dated December 31st, 2014, was provided by TraffEx Northwest Traffic
Experts. The traffic study is missing the 156 Ave SE. The traffic study is required to include all
impacted street: SE 144 street, 161 Ave SE, 160 Ave SE, SE 142ND Ave SE, and 156 Ave SE. The
proposed 27 lot subdivision would generate 267 daily vehicle trips. Weekday peak hour AM
trips would generate 21 vehicle trips, with 16 vehicles leaving and 5 vehicles entering the site.
Weekday peak hour PM trips would generate 28 vehicle trips, with 18 vehicles entering and 10
vehicles existing the site.
Plan -Planning Review Version 1 I February 18, 2015
Engineering Review Comments Kamran Yazdidoost I 425-430-7382 I
kyazdidoost@rentonwa.gov
Primary streets impacted by this development are:
• SE 144th Street
• 161 Ave SE
• 160 Ave SE
• SE 142nd Ave SE
• 156 Ave SE
Increased traffic created by the development will be mitigated by payment of transportation
impact fees of approximately $59,790.00.
3. To meet the City's complete street standards, the new internal roadway shall be designed to
meet the residential access roadway per City code 4 6 060. The new internal roadway shall be a
53 foot right of way, with 26 feet of pavement, curb, gutter, an 8 foot planter strip, a 5
ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 4 of 8
foot sidewalk and LED street lighting installed along both sides of the street. One side of the
road will be marked NO PARKING.
4. Mailbox locations shall be approved by the Post Office
5. LED street lighting meeting the residential lighting standards will be required per City of
Renton Standards.
6. Paving and trench restoration will comply with the City's Trench Restoration and
Overlay Requirements.
GENERAL COMMENTS
1. Separate permits and fees for sewer and storm connections will be required.
2. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require
separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. A
licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans.
3. Rockeries or retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building
permit. Structural calculations and plans shall be submitted for review by a licensed engineer.
Special Inspection is required.
4. A tree removal and tree retention/protection plan and a separate landscape plan shall be
included with the civil plan submittal.
5. A separate street lighting plan shall be included with the civil drawings.
Fire Review· Building Comments Corey Thomas I 425-430-7024 I cthomas@rentonwa.gov
Recommendations: Environmental Impact Comments:
1. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $495.10 per single family unit. This fee
is paid at time of building permit. Credit would be granted for two existing homes to be
removed.
Fire Code Related Comments:
1. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings
up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square
feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is
required within 300 feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to
1,500 gpm. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet
current code, including 5 inch storz fittings. Existing hydrants are not within 300 feet of the
furthest proposed dwellings, so new hydrants are required. A water availability certificate is
required from King County Water District 90.
2. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be minimum 20 feet wide
fully paved, with 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside turning radius. Fire access roadways shall
be constructed to support a 30 ton vehicle with 322 psi point loading. Access is
ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 5 of 8
required within 150 feet of all points on the buildings. Dead end streets that exceed 150 feet
are required to have an approved turnaround. Cul de sacs are required to be fully paved at 90
feet diameter.
Police Review Comments Cyndie Parks I 425-430-7521 I cparks@rentonwa.gov
Recommendations: Estimated CFS: 25 annually
Minimal impact on police services.
Technical Services Comments Bob MacOnie I 425-430-7369 I bmaconie@rentonwa.gov
Plan -Planning Review Version 1 I February 18, 2015
Recommendations: Preliminary Plat: Bob Mac Onie 1/29/2015
The final plat document must be prepared under the direction of and stamped by a licensed
"Professional Land Surveyor."
Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA15 000018 and
LNDlO 0522, respectively, on the final plat submittal. The type size used for the land record
number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Please note
that the land use action number provided will change when this subdivision changes from
preliminary to final plat status.
Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked by
the city when the ties have been provided.
Provide sufficient information to determine how the plat boundary was established.
Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per WAC32 130 100.
Note the date the existing city monuments were visited and what was found, per WAC 332 130
150.
Provide lot closure calculations.
Replace the word "DISTANCE" with "DISTANT" in the legal descriptions for both Boyer parcels
(Sheet 1). Correct the reference to "NORTH LANE" in two places which should read "THE
NORTH LINE."
Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots.
ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page6of8
Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or
calculated, if any.
The lot addresses will be provided by the city for the final plat submittal. Note said addresses
and the street names on the plat drawing.
On the final plat submittal, remove all references pertaining to utilities facilities, trees,
concrete, gravel, decks and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are
provided only for preliminary plat approval.
Remove the site address, references to critical areas and buffers and utilities providers (noted
in the "PROJECT INFORMATION" block on
Sheet 1). Do note encroachments.
Include in the "LEGEND" block those symbols and details that are used in the plat drawing.
Do not include a utility provider's block, owners' blocks, a civil engineer's block, and a
surveyor's bloc on the final submittal.
Do not include any references to use, density or zoning on the final submittal
If the abutting properties are platted, note the lot numbers and plat name on the plat
submittal, otherwise note the properties as "Unplatted".
Remove the building setback lines from the proposed lots. Setbacks will be determined at the
time that building permits are issued.
Note the research resources on the plat submittal.
Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the plat drawing.
The City of Renton "APPROVALS" blocks for the City of Renton Administrator, Public Works
Department, the Mayor, City Clerk and the Finance Director .
A pertinent approval block is also needed for the King County Assessor's Office. Provide
signature lines as required.
ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 7 of 8
If there is a Restrictive Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions document for this plat, then
reference the same on the plat drawing and provide a space for the recording number thereof.
Note that if there are restrictive covenants, agreements or easements to others (neighboring
property owners, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the
plat. The plat drawings and the associated document(s) are to be given to the
Project Manager as a package. The plat document will be recorded first (with King County).
The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) (said documents recorded
concurrently with, but following the plat) need to be referenced on the plat drawings.
There needs to be language regarding the conveyance of the Tracts (A, B, and C) created by the
plat; please check with the Stormwater Utility to see if they will require that the City be the
owner of Tract "B"', if not, and if there is to be a Homeowners' Association (HOA) created
for this plat, the following language concerning ownership of "Tract B" (the storm drainage
area) applies to this plat and should be noted on the final plat drawing as follows:
"Upon the recording of this plat, Tract "B" is hereby granted and conveyed to the Plat of Alpine
Nursery Homeowners' Association (HOA) for a storm drainage facility. All necessary
maintenance activities for said Tract will be the responsibility of the HOA. In the event that the
HOA is dissolved or otherwise fails to meet its property tax obligations, as evidenced by non
payment of property taxes for a period of eighteen (18) months, then each lot in this plat shall
assume and have an equal and undivided ownership interest in the Tract previously owned by
the HOA and have the attendant financial and maintenance responsibilities."
Otherwise, use the following language on the final plat drawing: "Lots 1 through 27, inclusive,
shall have an equal and undivided ownership interest in Tract B."
The foregoing statements are to be accompanied by language defining the maintenance
responsibilities for any infrastructure located on the Tract serving the plat or reference to a
separate recording instrument detailing the same.
Please discuss with the Stormwater Utility any other language requirements regarding surface
water BM Ps and other rights and responsibilities State the purpose of Tracts A and C and
include pertinent language regarding ownership of said tracts, plus rights and responsibilities.
All vested owner(s) of the subject plat, at the time of recording, need to sign the final plat. For
the street dedication process, include a current title report noting the vested property owner.
ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 8 of 8
~,~,-_ ..... .._...,.,,.,~,.~-----···~-· ... c::;;;·;f
' r r r , r j
OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M)
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
PROJECT NUMBER: LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
LOCATION: 16023 SE 144'" ST/14625161" AVE SE
DESCRIPTION: THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A 27 LOT SUBDIVISION WITH THREE TRACTS FOR OPEN SPACE, TREE
RETENTION, AND DRAINAGE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A COLLECTION OF THREE PARCELS LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF SE 144'" ST BETWEEN 160'" AVE SE AND 161" AVE SE. THE RESULTING 9.64-ACRE SITE IS LOCATED
WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE (R-4) ZONING CLASSIFICATION. THE 27 LOTS WOULD
RESULT IN A DENSITY OF 3.9B DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE. LOT SIZES WOULD RANGE FROM 8,000 SQUARE FEET
TO 13,369 SQUARE FEET. ACCESS TD THE PLAT IS PROPOSED VIA AN EXTENSION OF 161" AVE SE AND 160'" AVE
SE. INTERNAL CIRCULATION TERMINATES IN A CUL-DE-SAC IN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. THE
SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE CONTAINS GRID CONNECTIONS FROM 160TH TO 161ST AVE SE ALIGNED WITH
SE 145'" ST AND SE 146'" PLACE. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ON SITE ARE PROPOSED TO BE DEMOLISHED. THERE
ARE 598 SIGNIFICANT TREES ON THE SITE OF WHICH THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TD RETAIN 102 TREES. THERE
APPEAR TO BE NO CRITICAL AREAS LOCATED ON SITE.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED
ACTION HAS PROBABLE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS THAT CAN BE MITIGATED THROUGH MITIGATION MEASURES.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 13,
2015, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,
Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE
COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON,
ON MARCH 24, 2015 AT 11:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING.
l'lt -••
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUI\
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
j
of
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
ERC MEETING DATE:
Project Name:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Owner:
Applicant/Contact:
Project Location:
Project Summary:
Site Area:
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
February 23, 2015
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
LUA15-000018, PP, ECF
Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner
Roy & Kim Boyer; 14609161'' Ave SE; Renton, WA 98059
William & Marilyn Spiry; 16023 SE 144th St; Renton, WA 98059
Roy & Kim Boyer; 14609 161" Ave SE; Renton, WA 98059
16023 SE 144th St/14625 161'' Ave SE
The appllcant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and Preliminary Plat
approval for a 27 lot subdivision with three tracts for open space, tree
retention, and drainage. The subject property is a collection of three parcels
located on the south side of SE 144'h St between 160'h Ave SE and 161" Ave SE.
The resulting 9.64-acre site is located within the Residential-4 dwelling units per
acre (R-4) zoning classification. The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98
dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes would range from 8,000 square feet to 13,369
square feet. Access to the plat is proposed via an extension of 161 '' Ave SE and
160'h Ave SE. Internal circulation terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern
portion of the property. The southern portion of the site contains grid
connections from 160th to 161st Ave SE aligned with SE 145'h St and SE 146'h
Place. All existing structures on site are proposed to be demolished. There are
598 significant trees on the site of which the applicant is proposing to retain
102 trees. There appear to be no critical areas located on site.
9.64 acres
Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a
Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M).
Project Location Map
ERC Report
City of Renton Department of Community & E..v .. omic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PP
Report of February 23, 2015
PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ BACKGROUND
... nvironmental Review Committee Report
LUA15-000018, PP, ECF
Page 2 of 11
The applicant requested SEPA Environmental Review, Preliminary Plat approval for a 27-lot subdivision on
a 9.64 acre site. The application was received on January 14, 2015 and was determined complete on
January 15, 2014 and is therefore vested to the codes in effect at the time of land use application.
The subject property is roughly rectangular in shape and is a collection of three parcels located on the
south side of SE 144th St between 160th and 161'1 Ave SE. The site is located within the Residential-4
dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning classification.
The site currently contains two single family residences, a nursery, and several detached structures all of
which would be removed. The project site is surrounded by existing single family subdivisions zoned R-4
within the City limits and Unincorporated King County.
The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes would range from 8,000
square feet to 13,369 square feet. In addition to the 27 lots, 6 tracts are proposed for storm drainage,
open space and tree retention.
Access to the plat would be gained from 1601h and 161'' Ave SE via new. internal residential streets. A cu I-
de-sac is proposed near the northern end of the property. No direct access is proposed from SE 144'h St.
The applicant has submitted a Wetland Evaluation, Drainage Report, Arborist Report, Traffic Impact
Analysis, Infiltration Analysis, and a Geotechnical Engineering study with the application.
There are 598 significant trees on the site of which the applicant is proposing to retain 102 trees. A
stormwater pond is proposed within Tract B, located in the southeast portion of the site, which would
discharge into 161" Ave SE.
The applicant is proposing excavation in the amount of approximately 18,590 cubic yards and 14,310 cubic
yards of fill. The net export volume is approximately 4,280 cubic yards. Construction is anticipated to
commence in the Spring of 2016.
Staff received a comment letter from one neighboring property owner (Exhibit A.11). Questions/concerns
regarding water quality and access were raised within the letter. No other agency or public comments
have been received.
I PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those
project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and
environmental regulations.
A, Environmental Threshold Recommendation
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible
Officials:
ERCReport
City of Renton Department of Community & E mic Development lironmenta/ Review Committee Report
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF ALPINE NURSERY PP
Report of February 23, 2015 Page 3 of 11
Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period.
B. Mitigation Measures
c.
1. All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the
recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW, dated June
5, 2014 or an alternate report approved by the City's Plan Reviewer.
2. Additional secondary review is required for the proposed 7-8 foot stormwater pond wall
during the final engineering design which includes hydro-geotechnical evaluations for
buoyancy and lining, structural review and wall drainage relief against potential hydrostatic
pressures. The secondary review shall be conducted by an independent reviewer selected
by the City at the applicant's expense and shall be approved by the City's Plan Reviewer
prior to engineering plan approval.
3. The applicant shall be required to provide, to the Current Planning Project Manager, tree
retention inspection/monitoring reports after initial clearing, final grading, and annually for
two years by a qualified professional forester. The inspection/monitoring reports shall
identify any retained trees that develop problems due to changing site conditions and
prescribe mitigation.
4. The applicant shall submit a revised Traffic Study including an analysis of impacts caused by
the proposed development to the 156th Ave SE/SE144th St and the 156th Avenue SE/SE
142nd Street intersections and recommend appropriate mitigation as necessary. The
revised study shall be submitted to/approved by the City's Plan Reviewer, and applicable
mitigation shall be incorporated in the proposal, prior to engineering permit approval. The
applicant shall also be responsible for paying their fair share of the cost of a new signal to
be installed at the 156th Avenue SE/SE 142nd Street intersection based on any new PM
peak hour trips generated from the subdivision. The fee will be based on new PM peak hour
trips/1,310 Total PM peak hour trips x $500,000 (cost of new signal) and shall be paid prior
to the recording of the final plat.
Exhibits
Exhibit A.1
Exhibit A.2
Exhibit A.3
Exhibit A.4
Exhibit A.5
Exhibit A.6
Exhibit A.7
Exhibit A.8
Exhibit A.9
Exhibit A.10
Exhibit A.11
Exhibit A.12
Exhibit A.13
ERC Report (dated February 23, 2015)
Preliminary Plat Plan
Landscape Plan
Aerial Photo
Wetland Evaluation (dated January 4, 2015)
Drainage Administrative Interpretation
Geotechnical Report (dated June 5, 2014)
Drainage Report (dated June 2, 2014)
Traffic Impact Analysis {dated May, 2014)
Infiltration Analysis (January 9, 2015)
Public Comments: Corner (dated January 20, 2015)
Tree Retention Plan
Tree Retention Report (dated January 5, 2015)
£RC Report
City of Renton Department of Community & Et_ .. omic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PP
Report of February 23, 2015
D. Environmental Impacts
environmental Review Committee Report
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Page 4 of 11
The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine
whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to
occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal
is likely to have the following probable impacts:
1. Earth
Impacts: The existing site topography descends very gently form 144th Ave SE south; with an
elevation change of approximately 15 feet.
The applicant is proposing excavation in the amount of approximately 18,590 cubic yards and
14,310 cubic yards of fill is computed for the project. The net export volume is approximately
4,280 cubic yards. Any excess material that would not be used on site is expected to be exported
off site. Following construction it is anticipated the proposal would result in an impervious cover of
approximately 65%.
The applicant submitted a Geotechnical Report prepared by Earth Solutions NW LLC, dated June 5,
2014 (Exhibit A. 7). The report states that there are no geotechnical conditions on site that would
preclude the proposed development.
Soil conditions on site were observed in seven test pits excavated with a track hoe. Underlying
topsoil and fill, native soil exists consisting primarily of medium dense to dense glacial outwash
extending down to the maximum exploration depth of five feet below grade. The soils on site have
been determined as Everett Gravelly Sandy Loam series soils. Groundwater was not observed at
any of the test pit locations during fieldwork (May 2014). However seepage is anticipated at some
locations particularly in winter months depending on precipitation duration and intensity.
The geotechnical report includes specific recommendations in order to mitigate potential
geotechnical impacts including: site preparation and grading, excavation, slopes and embankments,
foundation support, floor slab-on-grade, drainage considerations, and pavement. Therefore, staff
recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant comply with the recommendations
included in the provided Geotechnical Engineering Report (Exhibit A.7).
It should be noted that an Infiltration Analysis was also prepared for the site by Earth Solutions NW
LLC, dated January 9, 2015 (Exhibit A.10). An additional eight test pits were excavated throughout
the stormwater footprint in the southern portion of the site and were expanded to 13 feet in
depth. Infiltration testing was performed and infiltration rates were measured at 70 inches per
hour.
Soil erosion is possible during demolition of existing structures and improvements especially if
conducted in the wet season. The applicant will be required to design a Temporary Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) pursuant to the current 2009 King County Surface Water
Design Manual Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements.
Mitigation Measures:
1. All earthwork performed, implemented by the applicant, shall be consistent with the
recommendations of the geotechnical report, prepared by Earth Solutions NW, dated June
5, 2014 or an alternate report approved by the City's Plan Reviewer.
Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, RMC 4-4-060 Grading, Excavation, and Mining Regulations
ERC Report
City of Renton Department of Community & Eo..vnomic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PP
Report of February 23, 2015
2. Water
a. Wetland, Streams, Lakes
Environmental Review Committee Report
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Page 5 of 11
Impacts: The applicant submitted a Wetland Evaluation (Exhibit A.5), prepared by Re-Align
Environmental (January 4, 2015). The report stated the there are no streams or wetlands located
on site. The site also does not appear to contain any critical area buffer. Similarly, City Critical
Area Maps show no streams or wetlands located within 500 feet of the site, indicating that no
buffers from off-site critical areas would affect this parcel.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation needed
Nexus: Not applicable
b. Storm Water
Impacts: The site is located within the Lower Cedar River drainage basin. Under pre-developed
conditions, site runoff sheet flows south onto neighboring properties to the south.
The applicant submitted a Preliminary Drainage Report prepared by DR Strong, dated January 12,
2015 (Exhibit A.8). Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Flow control
Duration Standard Forested site conditions area. An Offsite Level One Downstream Analysis was
included in the provided report. The report states that the runoff from the proposed project would
be collected and conveyed by a catch basin/pipe network to a detention/wet pond on the southern
edge of the developed area. The pond is designed to infiltrate the 100-year storm event.
The proposed runoff would then be discharged from the southeast corner of the site into a
proposed conveyance system in 161" Ave SE. The pre-developed and developed runoff flow paths
converge within Y. mile.
Downstream capacity issues have been observed and the area is considered a nuisance requiring
City maintenance work and there is potential for the proposal to aggravate existing or create new
drainage problems. The applicant is proposing to include a pond wall of approximately 7-8-feet in
height. However, due to potential seepage in and out of the pond, additional secondary review is
recommended during final engineering design that includes hydro-geotechnical evaluations for
buoyancy and lining, structural review and wall drainage relief against potential hydrostatic
pressures. The secondary review shall be conducted by an independent reviewer selected by the
City at the applicant's expense and shall be approved by the City's Plan Reviewer prior to
engineering plan approval. Additionally, the applicant would be required to be provide due
diligence in the grading and collection of drainage design during the construction phase so that
runoff and erosion does not impact the neighboring properties which will likely include an
evaluation of the overflow route conveyance capacity as part of the final TIR to ensure adequate
capacity exists downstream during a 100 year event.
Finally, an existing administrative interpretation requires all drainage facilities be required to
maintain up to a 15-foot vegetated buffer around drainage pond facilities (Exhibit A.6). It appears
the proposal includes an adequate landscape buffer along the perimeter of the proposed drainage
facility.
Mitigation Measures:
1. Additional secondary review is required for the proposed 7-8 foot stormwater pond wall during
the final engineering design which includes hydro-geotechnical evaluations for buoyancy and
ERCReport
City of Renton Department of Community & .......... nomic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PP
Report of February 23, 2015
Environmental Review Committee Report
WA15-000018, PP, ECF
Page 6 of 11
lining, structural review and wall drainage relief against potential hydrostatic pressures. The
secondary review shall be conducted by an independent reviewer selected by the City at the
applicant's expense and shall be approved by the City's Plan Reviewer prior to engineering plan
approval.
Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual as
amended by the City of Renton
3. Vegetation
Impacts: The vegetation across the subject site has been heavily disturbed by nursery activity, with
Douglas fir and bigleaf maple representing the canopy that remains onsite. South of the nursery
parcel, the two other lots are dominated by Douglas fir, western red cedar, and big leaf maple in
the canopy, with common occurrences of Douglas fir and Indian plum in the sub-canopy and
Nootka rose in the shrub layer. Herbaceous species found in the undisturbed forest areas include
bracken fern, sword fern and Oregon grape.
The applicant submitted a Tree Arborist Report prepared by Greenforest Incorporated Consulting
Arborist (dated January 5, 2015) (Exhibit A.13). There are a total of 598 trees located on site. The
applicant is required to retain 30 percent of the trees located on site that are not located within
critical areas, proposed rights-of-way and access easements. Of the 598 trees located on site 260
trees would be excluded from the tree retention requirements. The provided tree retention
worksheet indicates 14 trees are considered dead diseased or dangerous and 246 trees are located
within proposed public streets. Therefore, the applicant would be required to retain at least 102
trees on site. The applicant has proposed to retain 102 trees thereby complying with Tree
Retention requirements of the code (Exhibit A.12). The proposed tree retention plan preserves and
enhances the City's physical and aesthetic character by minimizing indiscriminate removal of the
vegetation on site.
The provided Tree Retention Report includes a specific recommendation for inspection of retained
trees due to changing site conditions (Exhibit A.13). In order to ensure trees were protected during
construction activities from damage to tree roots, trunks, and branches staff recommends, as a
mitigation measure, the applicant be required to provide, to the Current Planning Project Manager,
tree retention inspection/monitoring reports after initial clearing, final grading, and annually for
two years by a qualified professional forester. The inspection/monitoring reports shall identify any
retained trees that develop problems due to changing site conditions and prescribe mitigation.
It should also be noted that the applicant also provided a conceptual landscape plan as part of the
Preliminary Plat submittal which included the planting of 100 new trees on site (Exhibit A.3).
Mitigation Measures:
1. The applicant shall be required to provide, to the Current Planning Project Manager, tree
retention inspection/monitoring reports after initial clearing, final grading, and annually for
two years by a qualified professional forester. The inspection/monitoring reports shall
identify any retained trees that develop problems due to changing site conditions and
prescribe mitigation.
Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, RMC 4-4-130 Tree Retention and Land Clearing
Regulations
ERCReport
City of Renton Department of Community & 1..wnomic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PP
Report of February 23, 2015
4. Transportation
Environmental Review Committee Report
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Page 7 of 11
Impacts: The development located on the south side of SE 1441h St between 1601h Ave SE and 161'1
Ave SE at 16023 SE 1441h St. The site is within close proximity to King County Metro Route #111.
The nearest public transit stop is located at the northeast corner of the site at the intersection of SE
1441h St and 161'1 Ave SE.
Access to the plat would be gained from 1601h Ave and 161 st Ave SE. The internal access streets
connect 1601h Ave SE and 161'1 Ave SE.
Level of Service:
The applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by TraffEx, dated December 31, 2014
(Exhibit A.9). The report states that the proposed development would generate approximately 267
net new daily trips. During the weekday AM peak hour, the project would generate approximately
21 net new trips (S inbound and 16 outbound). During the weekday PM peak hour, the project
would generate approximately 28 net new trips (18 inbound and 10 outbound).
The report also analyzed the level of service at the following intersections: 1601h Ave SE/SE 1441h St
and 161'1 Ave SE/SE 1441h St. The traffic study states that these intersections will continue to
operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS B). The proposed project does not disclose likely
impacts to the intersections of 1561h Ave SE/SE1441h St and 1561h Avenue SE/SE 142"d Street.
Therefore, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant submit a revised Traffic
Study including an analysis of impacts caused by the proposed development to the 1561h Ave
SE/SE144'h St and the 1561h Avenue SE/SE 142"d Street intersections and recommend appropriate
mitigation as necessary. The revised study shall be submitted to/approved by the City's Plan
Reviewer, and applicable mitigation shall be incorporated in the proposal, prior to engineering
permit approval.
It should be noted that the City's Transportation Division has conducted an independent study of
the existing background traffic situation at the 1561h Avenue SE/SE 142"d Street intersection. Based
on the City's study the existing conditions warrant the installation of a traffic signal at this
intersection with or without the construction of the proposed subdivision. With the installation of a
traffic signal at this intersection, it is anticipated that the traffic conditions in the project vicinity
would improve. The installation of a traffic signal is not included on the City's Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP), therefore transportation impacts fees would not fund the installation
of a signal. Due to the existing LOS designation F at the 156'h Avenue SE/SE 142"d Street
intersection and the fact that the required traffic impact fees would not fund a traffic signal at this
intersection, staff recommends that the SEPA mitigation measure also include the language
requiring the applicant to be responsible for paying their fair share of the cost of a new signal to be
installed at the 156'h Avenue SE/SE 142"d Street intersection based on any new PM peak hour trips.
The fee will be based on new PM peak hour trips/1,310 Total PM peak hour trips x $500,000 (cost
of new signal) and shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat.
Increased traffic created by the development would be mitigated by payment of transportation
impact fees. Currently this fee is assessed at $2,143.70 per new single-family home. The fee, as
determined by the Renton Municipal Code at the time of building permit issuance shall be payable
to the City.
ERCReport
City of Renton Department of Community & Ec~ .. ~mic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PP
Report of February 23, 2015
Frontage Improvements:
c:.nvironmental Review Committee Report
WAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Page 8 of 11
All internal and frontage roads are required to meet street standards pursuant to RMC 4-6-060.
The internal public streets have been proposed with a right-of-way width of 53 feet which meets
the City's complete street requirements for residential access streets. Pavement width of 26 feet,
0.5 foot wide curbs, 8 foot wide landscaped planters (on both sides of the street), 5 foot wide
sidewalks (on both sides of the street), drainage improvements, and street lighting are required.
The applicant is not proposing any modifications for the internal or frontage road network.
Half-street improvements are proposed on SE 144th St, 1601h Ave SE, and 161'' Ave SE. Along SE
144th St approximately 15 feet of pavement width, curb, gutter, 5-foot sidewalk, and 8-foot planter
are proposed on the south side of SE 144th St. The applicant is proposing the dedication of a 30-foot
easement which existing along the northern property line.
The 160th Ave SE improvement would include 20 feet of pavement width to the face of the curb,
curb, gutter, 5-foot sidewalk, and 8-foot planter along the east side of the street. A comment
letter received by a neighboring property owner raised questions regarding the ownership of the
unimproved 160th Ave SE. Currently 30 feet of right-of-way exists west of the site for the northern
660 feet and this area is not located within an easement. The proposed improvements would
require a 25-35 foot wide right-of-way dedication along 160'h Ave SE.
The 161'' Ave SE improvement would include 13 feet of pavement width from the centerline to the
face of the curb, curb, gutter, 5-foot sidewalk, and 8-foot planter along the west side of the street.
The improvements would require a 26 foot wide right-of-way dedication along portions of the
street frontage.
Concurrency:
A concurrency recommendation will be provided in the staff report to Hearing Examiner based
upon the test of the citywide Transportation Plan, consideration of growth levels included in the
LOS-tested Transportation Plan, payment of a Transportation Mitigation Fee, and an application of
site specific mitigation. The development will have to meet the City of Renton concurrency
requirements.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a revised Traffic Study including an analysis of
impacts caused by the proposed development to the 1561h Ave SE/SE144'h St and the 1561h Avenue
SE/SE 142"d Street intersections and recommend appropriate mitigation as necessary. The revised
study shall be submitted to/approved by the City's Plan Reviewer, and applicable mitigation shall
be incorporated in the proposal, prior to engineering permit approval. The applicant shall also be
responsible for paying their fair share of the cost of a new signal to be installed at the 155th Avenue
SE/SE 142"d Street intersection based on any new PM peak hour trips generated from the
subdivision. The fee will be based on new PM peak hour trips/1,310 Total PM peak hour trips x
$500,000 (cost of new signal) and shall be paid prior to the recording of the final plat.
Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, RMC 4-6-060 Street Standards
E. Comments of Reviewing Departments
The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their
comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant."
ERCReport
City of Renton Department of Community & ____ omic Development
ALPINE NURSERY PP
r::nvironmental Review Committee Report
WAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Report of February 23, 2015 Page 9 of 11
v' Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this
report.
The Environmental Determination decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within the
14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680).
Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be
filed in writing together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady
Way, Renton, WA 98057, on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 13, 2015. RMC 4-8-110 governs appeals to the
Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City
Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -J'h Floor, (425) 430-6510.
ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative
land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the
appeal process for the land use actions.
Planning
1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday unless otherwise
approved by the Development Services Division.
2. A tree removal and tree retention/protection plan and a separate landscape plan shall be included with the civil plan
submittal.
Water
1. The proposed development is within the Water District 90's water service area.
2. Water availability certificate from the Water District 90 was provided to the City during the land use application.
3. Approved water plans from the Water District 90 must be provided during the utility construction plan review.
4. The project must meet all Fire Department requirements including hydrants and fire flow.
Sanitary Sewer
1. The site is located in the City of Renton sewer service area.
2. There is sewer main in SE 144th Street. Extension of an 8-inch sewer main will be required onsite, on 161" Ave SE and
160'H Ave SE. Plan shows sewer main onsite and 160'H Ave SE only. Extension of sewer main on 161 5
' Ave SE is
required.
3. Extension of sewer main through the public streets, and individual side sewers to serve the individual lots will be
required.
4. The development is subject to a wastewater system development charge (SDC) fee. The SDC fee for sewer is based on
the size of the new domestic water to serve the new home on each lot. The sewer fee for a %-inch or 1-inch meter
install is $2,135.00 (2015 rate). The rate at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit will be applicable.
5. The Central Plateau Interceptor Special Assessment District fee (SAD) fee will be applicable on the project. The SAD
fee rate when it was established in 2009 was $351.95 plus interest per lot. As of 3/24/2015, the SAD fee rate per lot is
$456.82 plus additional interest per day of $0.05111. The rate that will be applicable on the issuance day of the utility
construction permit will be applicable on this project.
Surface Water
1. As per the Manual, the minimum separation between water and stormwater lines is 10 feet and the minimum
separation between stormwater lines and other utility lines is 7 feet.
2. The provided infiltration letter does not provide adequate information regarding number of infiltration tests
conducted in the proposed pond location, where the test was conducted and at what depth the tests were conducted.
This information is needed to ensure three tests were conducted in the proposed infiltration pond. If three tests were
taken in the pond, then the letter should state that three tests were taken in the pond or provide a figure showing
where the infiltration tests were taken.
3. An overflow is proposed and is required. Evaluation of the overflow route conveyance capacity is requested to the Y.
location as part of the final TIR to ensure adequate capacity exists downstream during a 100 year event.
4. Provide the COR information on adjoining south residential properties on if they have basements or are split levels
below grade that may be impacted by the proposed infiltration facility.
5. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology is required since the grading and clearing of
ERCReport
City of Renton Department of Community & E
ALPINE NURSERY PP
mic Development lironmental Review Committee Report
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Report of February 23, 2015 Page 10 of 11
the site exceeds one acre.
6. Surface water system development (SDC) fee is $1,350.00 (2015 rate) for each lot. The rate that is applicable at the
time of utility construction permit issuance will be applicable.
Transportation/Street
1. Street lighting is required on public street frontages.
2. All public streets and private roads must have 0.5 feet wide vertical curb.
3. Pavement thickness must follow city of Renton standards.
4. Pedestrian connectivity must be provided with no missing portions.
5. Paving and trench restoration will comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements.
6. All electrical, phone, and cable services and lines serving the proposed development must be underground. The
construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton inspector prior to
recording the plat.
7. Maximum width of single family driveways for two car garage is 16 feet. Refer to RMC 4-4-080 regarding driveway
regulations. A minimum separation of 5 feet is required between driveway and the property line.
8. The shared driveway tract cross section shown in the preliminary grading plan currently labels it as tract C, and E,
whereas the plat layout plan labels differently. The name in the cross section must be corrected
Fire
1. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $495.10 per single family unit. This fee is paid at time of building
permit. Credit would be granted for two existing homes to be removed ..
2. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet
(including garage and basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm fire flow would
be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300 feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if
the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the requirement as long as they meet
current code, including 5 inch storz fittings. Existing hydrants are not within 300 feet of the furthest proposed
dwellings, so new hydrants are required. A water availability certificate is required from King County Water District 90.
3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be minimum 20 feet wide fully paved, with 25 feet inside
and 45 feet outside turning radius. Fire access roadways shall be constructed to support a 30 ton vehicle with 322 psi
point loading. Access is required within 150 feet of all points on the buildings. Dead end streets that exceed 150 feet
are required to have an approved turnaround. Cul de sacs are required to be fully paved at 90 feet diameter.
Property Services:
1. The final plat document must be prepared under the direction of and stamped by a licensed "Professional Land
Surveyor.11
2. Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA15 000018 and LNDlO 0522,
respectively, on the final plat submittal. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that
used for the land use action number. Please note that the land use action number provided will change when this
subdivision changes from preliminary to final plat status.
3. Show two ties to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked by the city when the ties
have been provided.
4. Provide sufficient information to determine how the plat boundary was established.
5. Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per WAC32 130 100.
6. Note the date the existing city monuments were visited and what was found, per WAC 332 130 150.
7. Provide lot closure calculations.
8. Replace the word "DISTANCE" with "DISTANT" in the legal descriptions for both Boyer parcels (Sheet 1). Correct the
reference to "NORTH LANE" in two places which should read "THE NORTH LINE."
9. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots.
10. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any.
11. The lot addresses will be provided by the city for the final plat submittal. Note said addresses and the street names on
the plat drawing.
12. On the final plat submittal, remove all references pertaining to utilities facilities, trees, concrete, gravel, decks and
other items not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary plat approval.
13. Remove the site address, references to critical areas and buffers and utilities providers (noted in the "PROJECT
INFORMATION" block on Sheet 1).
14. Do note encroachments.
15. Include in the "LEGEND" block those symbols and details that are used in the plat drawing.
16. Do not include a utility provider's block, owners' blocks, a civil engineer's block, and a surveyor's bloc on the final
submittal.
ERC Report
City of Renton Department of Community & Ee
ALPINE NURSERY PP
Report of February 23, 2015
'ic Development
17. Do not include any references to use, density or zoning on the final submittal
·ronmental Review Committee Report
LUAlS-000018, PP, ECF
Page 11 of 11
18. If the abutting properties are platted, note the lot numbers and plat name on the plat submittal, otherwise note the
properties as "Unplatted".
19. Remove the building setback lines from the proposed lots. Setbacks will be determined at the time that building
permits are issued.
20. Note the research resources on the plat submittal.
21. Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the plat drawing.
22. The City of Renton "APPROVALS" blocks for the City of Renton Administrator, Public Works Department, the Mayor,
City Clerk and the Finance Director .
23. A pertinent approval block is also needed for the King County Assessor's Office. Provide signature lines as required.
24. If there is a Restrictive Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions document for this plat, then reference the same on the
plat drawing and provide a space for the recording number thereof.
25. Note that if there are restrictive covenants, agreements or easements to others (neighboring property owners, etc.) as
part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the plat. The plat drawings and the associated
document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The plat document will be recorded first (with King
County). The recording number(s) for the associated document(s) (said documents recorded concurrently with, but
following the plat) need to be referenced on the plat drawings.
26. There needs to be language regarding the conveyance of the Tracts (A, B, and C) created by the plat; please check with
the Stormwater Utility to see if they will require that the City be the owner of Tract "B"', if not, and if there is to be a
Homeowners' Association (HOA) created for this plat, the following language concerning ownership of "Tract B" (the
storm drainage area) applies to this plat and should be noted on the final plat drawing as follows:
"Upon the recording of this plat, Tract "B" is hereby granted and conveyed to the Plat of Alpine Nursery Homeowners'
Association (HOA) for a storm drainage facility. All necessary maintenance activities for said Tract will be the
responsibility of the HOA. In the event that the HOA is dissolved or otherwise fails to meet its property tax
obligations, as evidenced by non payment of property taxes for a period of eighteen (18) months, then each lot in this
plat shall assume and have an equal and undivided ownership interest in the Tract previously owned by the HOA and
have the attendant financial and maintenance responsibilities."
Otherwise, use the following language on the final plat drawing:
"Lots 1 through 27, inclusive, shall have an equal and undivided ownership interest in Tract B."
27. The foregoing statements are to be accompanied by language defining the maintenance responsibilities for any
infrastructure located on the Tract serving the plat or reference to a separate recording instrument detailing the same.
28. Please discuss with the Stormwater Utility any other language requirements regarding surface water BMPs and other
rights and responsibilities State the purpose of Tracts A and C and include pertinent language regarding ownership of
said tracts, plus rights and responsibilities.
29. All vested owner(s) of the subject plat, at the time of recording, need to sign the final plat. For the street dedication
process, include a current title report noting the vested property owner.
General Comments
1. Separate permits and fees for side sewer connection and storm connection will be required.
2. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility
plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the civil plans.
ERC Report
! i I a a , .. '
xxxx-xxx
(
I
I
! i !
I
: iii / ..
~---
: ~
/ ~ii / .
/_ _____ ~ '
/~
..
\ ~·
' . '-·-----:-
>-~~ ~ ~~
w~~
[:Q>-~
~~> ~ z~[i
~ ~~::I:
O.::c;:j~ 0 if a.. [
~
,·
.J
I
~ I
I i-,.;
1-1 I a:i I 1-1
I ::c >< I=-w
[_
I-~ I ii, .. I iii 11 f . I e
I[ i . I Jl~,1
i l
"'""""f"'"i"'""'
V.>cr~,--~:, ""¥ 11<''1'"'">1>1·-' '~"' t"=
"ti:,],:-""""""A1 ''l"'f"l'II -·'fl;_;L,?4 C.oc!•
"
s·11ma i sw~
NV1, 11' lS -,JS J&l'.MN'/1
---------...
' -__'; \\ ·, ~r
N!
"''
M_
~ m
1-1 ::c >< w
Notes
None
256
0
0
LU)
128 256 Feet
WGS _ 1984 _Web_ Mercator_ A uxiliary_ Sphere
City of &errtoif:·.
F inance & IT Division
· ;.QQ00018 Alpine
Legend
City and County Boundary
Other
[: J City of Renton
Addresses
Parcels
1st Floor
1st Floor
2nd Floor
1st Floor
Olhe,r R11i lrlinn!'
Information Technology -GIS
RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.gov
2/22/2015
sery
EXHIB1TA4
Tn,s map is a .1ser generated static c:utput from iln lntcmcl mc1pp1ng :;.ne and
s for refercrce on y Data :ayc~s that aopcar on this map may or rray not be
accurate, current 0" ctt'lerw,se "ehab:e
TH IS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAV IGATION
Jaunary 4, 2015
Mr. Roy Boyer
14609 161st Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
Re-Align Environmental
Entire Document
Available Upon Request
Re: Wetland Evaluation -Alpine Nursery Site, Renton, WA
Dear Mr. Boyer:
1bis correspondence follows your request that I conduct a preliminary wetland reconnaissance on
the parcels ofland located in the southeast comer of the intersection of SE 144"' Street and 160'h
Ave SE. Based on your description of the site, the property under investigation includes the Alpine
Nursery parcel, located to the north, and two residential parcels located immediately to the south.
(See Attached Location and Site Maps).
Data Collection
Prior to visiting the site, online information was obtained using the King County iMap system, the
US Fish and Wildlife Service online National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), and the Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS) online soil mapping utility.
As shown in the Attached iMap photos and National Wetlands Inventory Map, no mapped streams
or wetlands are shown on the site. Similarly, these maps show no streams or wetlands within 500
feet of the site, indicating that no buffers from off-site critical areas would affect this parcel.
Also attached is the NRCS soil report for the site. As described in the soil report, the parcels appear
to be underlain by Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes. 1bis somewhat excessively
drained soil is commonly found on terraces, such as the Renton Highlands in which the site lies.
1bis soil exhibits a water table depth greater than 80 inches below the soil surface. 1bis map unit is
not typically known to include hydric inclusions, which indicates that wetlands are not typically
present within the map unit.
Fieldwork
Fieldwork was conducted on August 21,2014 using the three-parameter approach identified in the
Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington Manual) (WDOE 1997) and
the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual· Western Mountains, Valleys and
Coast Region (Regional Supplement) (USACE 2010), which are consistent with the Amry Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (ACOE Manual) (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and other
pertinent federal and local guidance (33 CFR 328.3 [a][l-5)).
During a review of the parcel boundary, I walked the perimeter of the property and found no visible
indication of drainage onto, or leaving the site. I observed that the site contains one small
depressional area that is approximately 3 feet deep, 30 feet wide and 50 feet long. The depression
does not drain off of the site, nor does it appear to capture any surface drainage. It appears that this
Bill Granger 140561/iO<"AveSE Renton, WA 90859 (206) 790-6132 EXHIBITAS
t
Entire Document
1-\Vailable Upon Request
Department of Community and Economic Development
· · Development Services Division
. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY /CODE .INTERPRETATION ..
MUNICIPAL
CODE SECTIONS:
REFERENCE:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
JUSTIFICATION:
RMC 4-6-030 Drainage (Surface Water) Standards
N/A
Landscaping, fencing, pond slopes, and other standards for stormwater
tracts and easements and ownership and maintenance responsibility for
stormwater facilities.
The current drainage code (RMC 4-6-030) references the current King
County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) for compliance with
stormwater standards. Requirements for landscaping in stormwater
facility tracts are included in Section 5.3.1.1 of the 2009 KCSWDM as
amended by the City of Renton. Section S.3.1.1 of the KCSWDM restricts
planting in berms that impound water or within 10 feet of any structure.
Requirements for pond geometry and side slopes are listed in Section
5.3.1.1 of the 2009 KCSWDM, as amended by the City of Renton. Adopted
standards allow for the side slopes of an open detention or water quality
treatment facilities (pond, wetpond, stormwater wetland, etc) to be
steeper than 3:1 if a fence is provided along the wall and/or around the
emergency overflow water surface elevation. This standard is resulting in
facilities that are difficult to maintain, expensive in labor and materials
for maintenance, and create a safety hazard to the maintenance crews.
Fencing requirements are also standardized in section 5.3.1.1 of the 2009
KCSWOM, as amended by the City of Renton. A fence is required to
discourage access to the stormwater pond, prevent litter, allow efficient
maintenance, and In consideration of worker and public safety.
Recognizing that requirements for landscaping and tree planting
contribute to the aesthetics and value of new surface water installations
while needing to ensure proper functionality and maintenance of
facilities, both the Department of Public Works and the Department of
Community and Economic Development desire to clarify standards
H:\CED\Planning\ntle lV\Docket\Administrative Policy Code lnterpretatlon\Cl-38\< EXHIBITA6
Earth
Solutions
NWLLc
Geotechnical Engineering
Geology
Environmental Scientists
Constmction Monitoring
'f4l
.~',. '' ·:· ·1 ';....,
Entire Document
Available Upon Request
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
ALPINE GARDENS PRELIMINARY PLA
16023 SOUTHEAST 144TH STREET
RENTON, WASHINGTON
ES-3377
Entire Document
1-\Vailable Upon Request
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT
for
ALPINE NURSERY
Preliminary Plat
16023 SE 1441
" Street and 14609/14625 161 51 Avenue SE Renton, WA
DRS Project No. 14069
Renton File No.
Owner/Applicant
Roy Boyer
14609 161st Ave SE
Seattle, WA 98103
Report Prepared by
hktdl
D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc.
620 ih Avenue
Kirkland WA 98033
(425) 827-3063
©2015 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
Report Issue Date
January 12, 2015
EXHIBIT~s
Entire Document
Available Upon Request
THE ALPINE PLAT
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
CITY OF RENTON
Prepared for
Mr. Roy Boyer
14609 161 91 Ave. SE
Renton, WA 98059
Prepared by
11410 NE 1241h St., #590
Kirkland, Washington 98034
Telephone: 425.522.4118
Fax: 425.522.4311
December 31, 2014
EXHIBIT~9
Entire Document
Available Upon Request
January 9, 2015
ES-3377.02
Earth Solutions NW LLC
Mr. Roy Boyer
14609 -161•1 Avenue Southeast
Renton, Washington 98059
Subject: Alpine Nursery -Boyer Properties
Infiltration Evaluation
16023 Southeast 144th Street
Renton, Washington
Dear Mr. Boyer:
• '· .(,11,1, '.,, ! i, ,11 \·\, )" ,,
• f:is.1'(,rnv_0 nta'. ~-:1e1·,_,·:)
As requested, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has prepared this letter summarizing our
findings regarding stormwater infiltration for the subject site.
The subject site is located on the south side of Southeast 144th Street; and east of 160th
Avenue Southeast in Renton, Washington. The site is occupied by two residential structures
and a plant nursery.
The subject site is located in an area in which glacial outwash (geologic map designation, Qgo)
soil has been identified on the geologic maps which ESNW used as a reference prior to the site
exploration.
A representative of ESNW was on-site to observe the subsurface conditions in December of
2014, and January of 2015. ESNW observed the excavation of eight test pits using hand tools,
as well as an excavator and operator, contracted by ESNW, throughout the stormwater pond
footprint in southern portion of the subject site. The test pits were advanced to approximately
13 feet deep into the native soil. ESNW observed poorly graded gravel (Unified Soil
Classification, GP), and well graded gravel (GW) in a dense condition at all three test locations
at the bottom-of-pond elevation. The well graded gravel contained a fines content of about 2.6
percent and 2.3 percent; and a USDA description of Extremely Gravelly Coarse Sand. Please
see the soil logs later in this report for a detailed description of the subsurface conditions.
EPA falling head infiltration testing was performed within the well graded sand and gravel soils
in three of the test pits. The excavations were terminated in the well graded sand and gravel
soils at maximum of 15 feet below existing grade, which equates to a minimum of six feet below
bottom-of-pond elevation. The soil conditions which ESNW observed were consistent with the
geologic map designation of glacial outwash.
No groundwater was observed at the test pits during our fieldwork
January 2015). No confining soil layer was encountered to an elevati
bottom.
la(Fi ¥ 136th P!a(e \LE., Suire 2.m • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (41..'l) 449-4704 •
(December 2014 and
EXHIBITR10
I
I
. I
lr)1
"-.! ~ ,;;) I
~I
---"' I ,
I I •
i i I
i
I • I i
I i
I i
I
NE 1/4 SECnON 23, TOV>NSHIP 23 N, RANGE 5 E, W.M.
X
X
X
X
I
X
X
X
>-
"' w
"' "' ::, z
w z
1RCE: RErE/llflrJN O'llcu..AJJCWS
"'"''""'""'"""""
"''"'"1IT'"''"' .............. "'~""'~ ===~M,~11
Rnn>8C""1Aon,,...,._,.,
IIIU'<fOSC« ........ -..
FE..-i,.,,.NnlFN,~ 0
;;::-~Q:J} -,.,.,
TESC l£GCND ~~&~~=-""
X X -··--
00-····-
a,-...,.,..-...,,"""""""""'"'"'' """-'-~
I \ I
, ·-. -. --1 -I I L
ALPINE NURSERY
I ~ _/
----J --I
"--"--I I I
"-' I I
I I~ I
'~ I
Im \--i
161SiAVESEi ' -----~ ------1 ) --~
i
I 1
I
I
I
--j
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
./
~ ml DR,TRONG
::E.::!!:=8 ·--~,
OolZ_"""' __ crg
811 ___ .__ ....... ---
EXHIB1TA12
~-
I .:.':... I :.:-..::.=:. "i' !R CITY 01
.~ENTO~'
01on,;n9/au11•;,,g/'u01.C Wor1<, Coot
"
-
" "
, ....
, ....
@
NORTH
:.....',"
ALPINE NURSERY
PRELIMINARY PLAT
1FEE CUTTINO AND LAND CL£ARNG Pl.AN
January 5, 2015
Maher Joudi
Greenforestlncorporated
D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers, Inc.
620 7'h Avenue
Kirkland, WA 98033
RE: Alpine Tree Inspection, 16023 SE 144'h Street, Renton WA 98059
Dear Mr. Joudi:
You contacted me and contracted my services as a consulting arborist. My assignment is to inspect
and evaluate the condition of surveyed trees at the above referenced site. I received a tree survey
from you showing the location and numbers of the significant trees. I visited the site last week and
inspected the trees indicated on the sheet, which are the subject of this report.
TREE INSPECTION
My inspection is limited to visual observation from the subject parcels. Some trees, both off site, and
within existing and proposed rights-of-way, are also included in this report.
I identified the species and confirmed trunk diameter (DBH) for the surveyed trees. I also identified
individual trees that are dead, dying, defective or dangerous. You identified specific trees to be saved
and retained. For these trees, I further evaluated health and structure, recorded visible defects and
calculated limits of disturbance. The results of this inspection are based on what is visible at the time
of the inspection.
4547 South Lucile Street, Seattle, WA 98118 EXHIBIT,1-13
Department of Comn-···1ity and
Economic Developme .. ,
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AND PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance
Mitigated (DNS-M) for the following project under the authority of the Renton municipal
code.
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
LUA15-000018
Location: 16000 block of SE 114th Street. The applicant is requesting SEPA &
Preliminary Plat approval for a 27 lot subdivision with three tracts. The 9.64-acre site
is located within the Residential-4 dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning classification.
The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98. Access to the plat is proposed via an
extension of 161st Ave SE and a partial extension of 160th Ave SE. There appears to
be no critical areas located on site.
Appeals of the DNS-M must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 13,
2015. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing
Examiner c/o City Clerk, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals
to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be
obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 425-430-6510.
A Public Hearing will be held by the Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City
Hall, on March 24, 2015 at 11:00 am to consider the submitted application. If the
DNS-M is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested
parties are invited to attend the public hearing.
Publication Date: February 27, 201S
City c •.. _nton Department of Community & Economic 'opment
GREEN FOLDER NOTIFICATION OF REVIEW
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -··· ------.-----COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29, 2015
APPLICATION NO: LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15, 2015
APPLICANT: William & Mary Spiry/Roy & Kim Boyer PROJECT MANAGER: Roca le Timmons
PROJECT TITLE: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat PROJECT REVIEWER:
SITE AREA: 419,829 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross):
LOCATION: 16023 SE 144th St & 14609/14625 161st Ave SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross)
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and Preliminary Plat approval for a 27 lot
subdivision with three tracts for open space, tree retention, and drainage. The subject property is a collection of three parcels
located on the south side of SE 144th St between 160th Ave SE and 161st Ave SE. The resulting 9.64-acre site is located within the
Residential-4 dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning classification. The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre.
Lot sizes would range from 8,000 square feet to 13,369 square feet. Access to the plat is proposed via an extension of 161st Ave SE
and a partial extension of 160th Ave SE. Internal circulation terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern portion of the property. The
southern portion of the site contains grid connections from 160th to 161st Ave SE aligned with SE 145th Place. All existing
structures on site are proposed to be demolished. There are 598 significant trees on the site of which the applicant is proposing to
retain 102 trees. There appears to be no critical areas located on site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Assessment,
Drainage Report, Arborist Report, Traffic Impact Analysis, and a Geotechnical Engineering study with the application.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Element of the Environment Element of the Environment
Earth Housinn
Air Aesthetics
Water Liaht/G/are
Plants Ret:reation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Trans rtation
Environmental Health Pub/Jc Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural Preservation
Natural Resources
Airport Environment
10,000Feet
14 ODO Feet
&rm .__i2.,n .f.e,,--~ in~
Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews
nu.rr/S
Which type of comments are entered:
Recommendation: Comments that impact the project including any of the Environemental Impacts above.
Correction: Corrections to the project that need to made before the review con be completed and/or requesting
submittal af additional documentation and/or resubmittal af existing documentation.
What Status should be used:
Reviewed-I have reviewed the project and have no comments.
v.
Reviewed with comments -I have reviewed the project and I have comments entered in Recommendations.
Correction/Resubmit -I have reviewed the project and the applicant needs to submit and/or resubmit documentation
and I have added corrections in Corrections.
City . nton Department of Community & Econom velopment
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 29, 2015
APPLICATION NO: LUA15-000018, ECF, PP DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 15, 2015
APPLICANT: William & Mary Spiry/Roy & Kim Boyer PROJECT MANAGER: Rocale Timmons
PROJECT TITLE: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat PROJECT REVIEWER:
SITE AREA: 419,829 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross):
LOCATION: 16023 SE 144th St & 14609/14625 161" Ave SE PROPOSED BLDG AREA (gross)
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and Preliminary Plat approval for a 27 lot
subdivision with three tracts for open space, tree retention, and drainage. The subject property is a collection of three parcels
located on the south side of SE 144th St between 160th Ave SE and 161st Ave SE. The resulting 9.64-acre site is located within the
Residential-4 dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning classification. The 27 lots would result in a density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre.
Lot sizes would range from 8,000 square feet to 13,369 square feet. Access to the plat is proposed via an extension of 161st Ave SE
and a partial extension of 160th Ave SE. Internal circulation terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern portion of the property. The
southern portion of the site contains grid connections from 160th to 161st Ave SE aligned with SE 145th Place. All existing
structures on site are proposed to be demolished. There are 598 significant trees on the site of which the applicant is proposing to
retain 102 trees. There appears to be no critical areas located on site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Assessment,
Drainage Report, Arborist Report, Traffic Impact Analysis, and a Geotechnical Engineering study with the application.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code} COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housina
Air Aesthetics X
Water Liaht/Glare
Plants A Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals X Transnnrtation X
Environmental Health J< Public Services X
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000Feet
14,000Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
-s~ t,>G.s,t-z.
We have reviewed this application with paf)ftltlar attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where _Cld'/litional informatio is ee f!d to yrop~rly assess this proposal.
-f -/,1 /""! If .· ,I ' _,.1 1'
Date 1
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
-ofu f'.tif u,4 (.e.-v-c:,J;.(h,_,j/lltVl JO.f'O_,.; ~M Oil
s.e. /4'-f s.W &-lo OIJ't..<U ~le...J..-«: .. f.r~.s t.u:.e.. q
"i,,tvla( L VVl~"'l ~0, -'5 "'5,L> f-?o..p,,r~a,r k.. M"'f'tz..
(A--Uvgr,s12...._h)-5;"1ft s~, I fe..r,vi,/1,;/ l<.a<k;
~~ ra.c:4..
;). Qu.a.,.U\> Ct}U!.irte.q -J:o ra+ U'.S(.. a.~ ooi<. 'f:if~ .. , ... s or lld pro/4.c.i! ~
-SvJys.f S-f.z.fiy L,nL.._ (Ti J..a. -fo~../o.s.q~
3 . R ou.,J b -ch(h'' J~ s ~ (..{:.(·c.s ~ C.. of-~ "? q., lo+ 9 -fn t {,,_,/ ~ SE.
q -hi-fa ( ill '6' ~5, .
t Ro"'c9 A -~ ~e( •
-b.J-w&.i Lef-s. <-f of .2.3 ~ QA-&r -tl:""'-.s~k b ur (..(u__,
Q. ~ {( Moiur,7 ~ec:; -Sf q_U... ;.c;. fo o ~/( .{;l, c;;
le..,~ (M.4,"J fu
5. Ski~ s/tvet( fl,~+ & pt~tA,-kc.(J cJoS-t£ ~ c{o (<ad~
S-h:y ~~me;, 1 30 fe,:_f ~ s-tvea..-f-/;~, "+:ee..f ~;~;~ St,(~((,(
c;.,11.Q .(-l-.,..L ~Jr~1 f\of c.,[oc.£.-.r -tf\..Cc-<A 10 ~-e.J ~ (i,-;Vl..-<..J°{r.
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact
or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
,,,,' ·-----' ' "--~~-~""'"""' f'RENTON'
. DEPARTMENT.QFC9tv'lfVllJNJ~lllg,gij'QIVIICD~Y€~QPll,1ENT. · ·· ·· · · m ,,1~F~toA~r11191JiERv1cE sv]y1~1~1NG
On the 15th day of January, 2015, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing
Notice of Application and Acceptance documents. This information was sent to:
Agencies
William & Marilyn Spiry
Roy & Kim Boyer
Maher Joudi, DR Strong Consulting
Kim Smith
(Signature of Sender):
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
ss
See Attached
Owner
Owner
Party of Record
Owner
i I.
\
Notary ( Print) :_....::..4-=-..:....:'-""'=--""=_,__,_-=-=t-.c::..--'.!J.it=:'-'-"'"'-';~;:,::_---
My appointment expires:
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
template -affidavit of service by mailing
Rav and Kim Baver
14609 161st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
Kim Smith
14609 161st Ave SE
Renton, WA 98059
William and Marv Soirv
16023 SE 144th St
Renton, WA 98059
Maher Joudi
D.R. Strong Consulting Eng.
620 7th Ave
Kirkland, WA 98033
1081310010 1457500121 2323059160
ANDERSON JENNIFER R+STEVEN ANDERSON KYLE D+LORI L BERRY MARK D+ THERESE M
16105 SE 145TH PL 14326 160TH AVE SE 14405 160TH AVE SE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
1081320170 1081320181 1081320190
BIEHL JAMES B+CLAUSER,JANIC BOSTJANCIC J J BOSTJANCIC JOSEPH J
16120 SE 146TH PL 16110 SE 146TH PL 16110 E 146TH PL
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055
1423059010 1079300080 5195400090
BOWDLE ALLEN C+PENELOPE J BROOKER DONALD L +ANGELA M BROWN CHELSEA M+JOSHUA T
15928 SE 144TH ST 14635 161ST AVE SE 14450 158TH PL SE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
5195400120 1016000030 2323059145
CAPELLI SARAH R+JASON L CELIS CAROLYN CHARLES DALE L+CHERYL L
14432 158TH PL SE 14247 161ST AVE SE 15930 SE 148TH ST
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98056
1081310210 2323059161 2323059162
COMPHER LEONARD A & SYLVIA COOK BESSIE F COOK BESSIE F
14417 162ND AVE SE 11304 SE 65TH ST 15905 SE 144TH ST
RENTON, WA 98059 BELLEVUE, WA 98006 RENTON, WA 98059
14S7500122 7253700070 1081310270
COOK SHANE+CYNTHIA CORGIAT LINDA B CORNER EDWARD J
16020 SE 144TH ST 16039 SE 142ND PL 16104 SE 145TH PL
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
2323059138 1397510080 2323059184
CORNER TIMOTHY G COUVION STEVE+ROSARIO DAVIS MIKE+SANDRA
14611160TH AVE SE 15821 SE 143RD ST 14519 160TH AVE SE
RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
1081310230 2323059159 1081310180
DEAN ZACHARY GORDON+KELSEY DORROUGH ERICK L+WILLETI BE EELLS KEVIN P
16138 SE 145TH PL 15917 SE 144TH ST 14406 162ND AVE SE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON,WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
5195400130 1079300030 1081310280
ELLIS SARA G FALKNER RANDY S+ TERESA K FERKINGSTAD EDWIN A+LINDA C
14802 SE 139TH CT 14720 160TH PL SE 14426 161 AVE SE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
7253700090 2323059148 2323059146
GAMMELL NORMAN D+PAYNE-GAMM GARCIA ALEJANDRO+CHRISTINA GILLILAND JUSTIN E+YOKO
16043 SE 142ND PL 14525 160TH AVE SE 15914 SE 148TH ST
RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
2323059144 1016000070 1397510090
GILLILAND KEITH E GRAHAM DEBRA J GREFTHEN GENE L
701 9TH PL 14250 161ST AVE SE 15831 SE 143RD
MUKILTEO, WA 98275 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98056
1081310020 1081320020 7253700060
HANSON ROBERT M+KATHLEEN A HARRISON MICHAEL D HOYT CLAUDIA
16117 SE 145TH PL 16113 SE 146TH PL 16027 SE 142ND PL
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
1457500123 2323059164 1423059081
HUFF DAVID W+PAM N HUGHES RUSSELL E+SUSAN G IPPOLITO GUY M
14629 203RD AVE SE 15903 SE 144TH ST 15820 SE 144TH ST
RENTON, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
1081310300 5122200010 1081320010
JARVIS GERALD M JOHNSON MICHAEL D JONES CHARLES EDWARD+PAMELA
14410 161ST AVE SE 15914 E 144TH ST 14606 161ST AVE SE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98059
5195400100 5122200020 1081310040
JORGENSON JASON R KIRCHGESLER KV KOSONEN MARK H
14446 158TH PL SE 15906 SE 144TH 16129 SE 145TH PL
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98057
1457500120 5195400160 1081310290
LANGE DAVID A LANGLOIS ANDREA R+DALTON M LEWIS BRYAN E
6212 NE 7TH CT 14402 158TH PL SE 14418 161ST AVE SE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
2323059186 2323059143 1081320160
LINDBERG MARIA E+JEFFREY K LYMAN STEVEN R+MARTHALEE MATSUDAIRA J
14521160TH AVE SE 14505 160TH AVE SE 16128 SE 146TH PL
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
1457500119 1081320030 2323059048
MCAUUFF JENNIFER MCCLINTOCK TERRY R & JC METCALF ROBERT C
14302 160TH AVE SE 16123 SE 146TH PL 14423 160TH AVE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98059
1457500156 1081310190 5195400110
MOHR NORBERT W MOKIN WILLIAM D+DONA FROST MONCIVAIZ SHAWN T +SARAH A
16224 SE 144TH 14404162ND AVE SE 14440 158TH PL SE
RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
1081310310 7253700010 2323059101
O'BRIEN JAMES H PAYNTER CRAIG R PELL BOB L
14402 161ST AVE SE 14230 160TH AVE SE 2019 I ST NE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 AUBURN, WA 98002
2323059101 1016000080 5122200030
PELL BOB L PNK INVESTMENTS LLC PONCINI VICTORIA M
15824 SE 148TH ST 15600 NE 8TH ST 15832 SE 144TH ST
RENTON, WA 98059 BELLEVUE, WA 98008 RENTON, WA 98059
1016000050 1081310030 1081310170
POTIER RICHARD W+URSULA E PRETS EDWARD REEDAL BARBARA J
14244 161ST AVE SE 16123 SE 145TH PL 11412 162ND AVE SE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
2323059197 1081310200 2323059162
RICHMOND scon ERIC RUSS JOEL T SANBORN KENNETH H
14643 160TH AVE SE 14409 162ND AVE SE 15911 SE 144TH ST
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
1397500010 1081310220 2323059157
SAPPENFIELD JEFFREY S+DEBOR SCHLITI MICHAEL W SCHRAG RYAN
15846 SE 143RD ST 3520 ABERDEEN AVE NE 15820 SE 148TH ST
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98056 RENTON, WA 98059
1016000010 2323059179 2323059147
SERNA JESSE $+ADRIANA R SHERRY SCOTIT+ERIN D SMITH ALAN B+JUDY F
16036 SE 144TH ST 14627 160TH AVE SE 14517 160TH AVE SE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
2323059099 1016000040 1397510110
SMITH KIM K SUGIURA ARNOLD SUNDET LEVERN ELDO
14609 161ST AVE SE 14241161ST AVE SE 15845 SE 143RD ST
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98055
1081310250 Tenant Tenant
TAYLOR JEFFREY B+ LESLIE M 16106 SE 144th St 16114 SE 144th St
16120 SE 145TH PL King County, WA 98059 Renton, WA 98059
RENTON, WA 98059
7253700040 1016000020 2323059156
TONDA DAVID R TUCKER JOHN P VELDWYK HARRY J
16021 SE 142ND PL 16028 SE 144TH ST 5500 RAINIER AVES
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 SEATILE, WA 98118
5195400140 5195400140 1081310260
VIERRA JEREMY KANOA+ERICA A VIERRA JEREMY KANOA+ERICA A VILLABLANCA HELENA
4259 WOODLAND PARK AVE N 14418 158TH PL SE 16112 SE 145TH PL
SEATILE, WA 98103 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
1081310240 2323059038 VUONG BINH K & HA TAT
VON FUCHS GEORGE F VUONG BINH K & HA TAT 14624 1615T AVE SE
16128 SE 145TH PL 14349 SE 92ND ST RENTON, WA 98059
RENTON, WA 98059 NEWCASTLE, WA 98059
1079300040 1016000060 1079300020
WAGAR BERNADETIE M WALTOSZJIM H WARD BRIAN J+CATHERINE M
14726 160TH PL SE 14248 161ST AVE SE 14725 160TH PL SE
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059
1457500124 5195400150 1397510100
WIEST OSCAR WILSON KRISTINE WOLF HOWARD C JR=KERRY S
14306 160TH AVE SE 14410 158TH PL SE 15841 SE 143RD ST
RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98059 RENTON, WA 98055
1016000090 16005 SE 144th St
WYMAN KEVIN King County, WA 98059
1200 STH AVE STE 1711
SEATILE, WA 98101
Dept. of Ecology**
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
WSDOT Northwest Region *
Attn: Ramin Pazooki
King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710
US Army Corp. of Engineers*
Seattle District Office
Attn: SEPA Reviewer
PO Box C-3755
Seattle, WA 98124
Boyd Powers***
Depart. of Natural Resources
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
KC Dev. & Environmental Serv.
Attn: SEPA Section
3S030 SE Douglas St. #210
Snoqualmie, WA 98065
Metro Transit
Senior Environmental Planner
Gary Kriedt
201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
Seattle Public Utilities
Jailaine Madura
Attn: SEPA Coordinator
700 Fifth Avenue 1 Suite 4900
PO Box 34018
Seattle, WA 98124-4018
AGENCY (DOE) LETIER MAILING
(ERC DETERMINATIONS)
WDFW -Larry Fisher*
1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201
Issaquah, WA 98027
Duwamish Tribal Office *
4717 W Marginal Way SW
Seattle, WA 98106-1514
KC Wastewater Treatment Division *
Environmental Planning Supervisor
Ms. Shirley Marroquin
201 s. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
City of Newcastle
Attn: Tim McHarg
Director of Community Development
12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200
Newcastle, WA 98056
Puget Sound Energy
Kathy Johnson,
355 110th Ave NE
Mailstop EST llW
Bellevue, WA 98004
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.*
Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer
39015 -172"d Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092
Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program•
Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert
39015172"' Avenue SE
Auburn, WA 98092-9763
Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation*
Attn: Gretchen Kaehler
PO Box 48343
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
City of Kent
Attn: Jack Pace
Acting Community Dev. Director
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
City ofTukwila
Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
*Note: If the Notice of Application states that it Is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities
will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of
Application.
**Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist/ Site Plan PMT, & Notice to
the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov
***Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT,
& Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov
template -affidavit of service by mailing
l_f vo.Y"4'ould like to be made a party of r_ecord to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this
~ and return to: City of Renton, CED -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
Name/File No.: Alpi.ne Nursery Preli~inary Plat /LUA15-000018, ECF, PP /fr [{L---
::~~~G A~:J4fif1fttfa1t~y/State/Zip: &«~·
TELEPHONE NO.: <./ J.,5:-a\ fl,9-S-'i?& {)..__,-
' ~ .
' -.
I •
1
' ·~
'
f ' \r I <
'\
II
'
NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M)
A Master Application has been filed and ac<epted with the Department of Community & Economic Development
(ao)-Planning l>Mslon of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the appllcadon and the necessary
Public Approvals.
DATE OF Nona OF APPUCATION: January 15, 2015
lAND USE NUMBER: LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
PROJECT NAME: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and Preliminary Plat
approval for a 27 lot subdivision with three tracts for open space. tree retention, and drainage. The subject property is a
collection of three parcels located on the south side of SE 144th St between 160th Ave SE and 161st Ave SE. The
resulting 9.64-acre site is located within the Resldential-4 dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning classification. The 27 lots
would result in a density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes would range from 8,000 square feet to 13,369 square
feet. Access to the plat is proposed via an extension of 161st Ave SE and a partial extension of 160th Ave SE. Internal .
circulation terminates in a cul~--sac in the northern Portion of the property. The southern partion of the site contains
grid connections from 160th to 161st Ave SE aligned with SE 145th Place. All existing structures on site are proposed to
be demolished. There are 598 significant trees on the site of which the applicant ls proposing to retain 102 trees. There
appears to be no aitical areas located on site. The applicant has submitted a Wet1and Assessment, Drainage Report,
Arborist Report, Traffic Impact Analysis, and a Geotechnical Engineering study with the applicatlon.
\ PROJECT LOCATION: 16023 SE 144~ St & 14609/14625 161" Ave SE
Ol'TIONA1 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIRCANCE, MITIGATEO (DN5-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has
determined that significant envlronmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as
permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the Qty of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a
DNS-M is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single
comment period. There wlll be no comment period followir11 the issUance of the Threshold Determination of Non-
Signiflcance-Mltlgated (ON5-M). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental Impacts of the
proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DN5-M.
PERMIT APPLICATION DATE:
NOTla OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:
APPUCANT/PROIECf CONTACT PERSON:
Permlts/Revi~:
Other Permits~ be required:
Requested Studies:
Location whe<e appllcatlan may
January 14, 2015
January 15, 2015
Roy & Kim Boyer/14609 161" Ave SE/Renton, WA 98059/425-766-
3066
Environmental (SEPA) Review, Preliminary Plat
Ct: ,, ,t,i, ... .. ~
Bulldlng Permit. construction Permit ·• ' ( • '
•,\,•,:,
~ • .,;.·l·\·r .. -·~-,
Arborlst. Oralnage and Geotedmlcal Reports, Traffic Study, Wetland
lls$e55ment
be reviewed: Dap bllellt of Community & Economic Development (aDI-Pl•nnlng
} DMslon, Sixth -Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA
'' 98057 ,,r'::£!:;,;-~°'.==~~=£~~:::!!.'
f
I
M.*4=,,., ·.
Name/File No.: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat /LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
NAME: ~ +eve.. LYM;\ N
MAILING ADDRESS:'"' S:o s:-16 o-l"' Ave. Se
TUEPHONE NO.: ~A~-~ ~;1-I I 9 6
otyJState/Zip, fen f:o µ 1 u.. rt
'f eos-9
. ,I
-. I Denis Law · C f
-
__ _:M:ayo~r ------~', t~-.... ltyo l , . ,
January 15, 2015
Roy Boyer
14609 161'' Ave SE
Renton,WA 98059
·. ! c), r-\1 rr[· r r (::: \ \11 1 fl l J.\~ \_; ,\~...!Ll
Community & Economic Development Department
C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator
Subject: Notice of Complete Application
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat, LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
Dear Mr. Boyer:
The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application
is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review.
It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on
February 9, 2015. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information
is required to continue processing your application.
In addition, this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on March 10, 2015
at 11:00 am, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way,
Renton. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at
the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you prior to the scheduled
hearing.
Please contact me at (425} 430-7219 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Rocale Timmons
Senior Planner
cc: William & Marilyn Spiry, Kim Smith/ Owner(s)
Mahar Joudi / Party of Record
Renton City Hall , 1055 South Grady Way , Renton, Washington 98057 , rentonwa.gov
n .. -::· '"~
Ii~.·., .. ··'::-. ;,;!·.
.tJ,·i
!
'
,·:'.
ti.I
'
I:
r ; .,,, " City of
r , f
i
'
( )
NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M)
A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development
(CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary
Public Approvals.
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION:
LAND USE NUMBER:
PROJECT NAME:
January 15, 2015
LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and Preliminary Plat
approval for a 27 lot subdivision with three tracts for open space, tree retention, and drainage. The subject property is a
collection of three parcels located on the south side of SE 144th St between 160th Ave SE and 161st Ave SE. The
resulting 9.64-acre site is located within the Residential-4 dwelling units per acre (R-4) zoning classification. The 27 lots
would result in a density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre. Lot sizes would range from 8,000 square feet to 13,369 square
feet. Access to the plat is proposed via an extension of 161st Ave SE and a partial extension of 160th Ave SE. Internal
circulation terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern portion of the property. The southern portion of the site contains
grid connections from 160th to 161st Ave SE aligned with SE 145th Place. All existing structures on site are proposed to
be demolished. There are 598 significant trees on the site of which the applicant is proposing to retain 102 trees. There
appears to be no critical areas located on site. The applicant has submitted a Wetland Assessment, Drainage Report,
Arborist Report, Traffic Impact Analysis, and a Geotechnical Engineering study with the application.
PROJECT LOCATION: 16023 SE 144'" St & 14609/14625 161" Ave SE
OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the lead Agency, the City of Renton has
determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as
permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a
DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single
comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-
Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the
proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M.
PERMIT APPLICATION DATE:
NOTICE DF COMPLETE APPLICATION:
January 14, 2015
January 15, 2015
APPUCANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Roy & Kim Boyer/1460916lst Ave SE/Renton, WA 98059/425-766-
3066
Permits/Review Requested:
Other Permits which may be required:
Requested Studies:
Location where application may
be reviewed:
Environmental (SEPA) Review, Preliminary Plat
Building Permit, Construction Permit
Arborlst, Drainage and Geotechnlcal Reports, Traffic Study, Wetland
Assessment
Department of Community & Economic Development {CEO) -Planning
Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA
98057
If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this
form and return to: City of Renton, CED -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057.
Name/File No.: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat /LUAlS-000018, ECF, PP
NAME:----------------------------------
MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip:-----------
TELEPHONE NO.: ---------------
,~-,,.! -~· ...•. ".,
..... , ___ _
" ,..
-·-----.. --.-~~'-"'""'"'-""'"''"J'",C•-''<,P·'"''Ji-"·· ,, f /
> -'-C:ity of
T r )
PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for March 10, 2015 before the Renton Hearing Examiner
in Renton Council Chambers at 11:00 am on the 7th floor of Renton City Hall located at 1055
South Grady Way.
CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW:
Zoning/land Use:
Environmental Documents that
Evaluate the Proposed Project:
Development Regulations
Used For Project Mitigation:
Proposed Mitigation Measures:
The subject site is designated COMP-RLD on the City of Renton Comprehensive
Land Use Map and R-4 on the City's Zoning Map.
Environmental (SEPA) Checklist
The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC4-2-110A, RMC4-7
and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate.
The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed
project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not
covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above.
Compliance with provided Geotech Report
Compliance with provided Arborist Report
Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner, CED -Planning
Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on January 29, 2015. This matter is also tentatively
scheduled for a public hearing on March 10, 2015, at 11:00 am, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall,
1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Planning Division to
ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-6578. Following the issuance of the SEPA Determination,
you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments regarding the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If
you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,
please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of
record and will be notified of any decision on this project.
CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219; Eml:
rtimmons@rentonwa.gov
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
City of Renton RECEl\!EC
JAN 1 4 Z01'1 LAND USE PERMIT
MASTER APPLICATION CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
NAME: William & Marilyn Spiry Alpine Nursery
ADDRESS: 16023 SE 144"' St
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
16023 SE 144'" Street & 14609/14625 161" Avenue SE
CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98059 Renton, WA 98059
, KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER($):
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
232305-9044
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
EXISTING LAND USE(S):
NAME: Roy Boyer Single-Family Residential
PROPOSED LAND USE(S):
COMPANY (if applicable): Single-Family Residential
ADDRESS: 14609 161" Ave SE
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
RLD · Residential Low Density
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98059 (if applicable)
NA
EXISTING ZONING:
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 766-3066 R-4
CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):
NA
NAME: Roy Boyer
SITE AREA (in square feet):
419,829
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
COMPANY (if applicable): DEDICATED:
124,520
ADDRESS: 14609 161" Ave SE
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
0
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98059 ACRE (if applicable)
3.98
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable)
27
(425) 766-3066
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
Removal of two existing and creation of 27 new.
R:\2014\0\l4069\J\Documents\SPIRY LANDUSE PERMIT MASTER APP.doc -I -OJ/11
PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) --~----~-----------
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
Two existing units to be removed.
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): None
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): None
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): None
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA
NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable): NA
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW
PROJECT (if applicable): NA
PROJECT VALUE:
$6,750,000.00
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):
D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE
D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO
D FLOOD HAZARD AREA
D GEOLOGIC HAZARD
D HABITAT CONSERVATION
D SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES
D WETLANDS
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
___ sq.ft.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
(Attach legal description on separate sheet with the followina information included)
SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION _ll_, TOWNSHIP _ll_, RANGE _5_, IN THE CITY
OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Name/s) W, "LLi t}m ,1-t,f Ale il 'N _s; IR , declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
Washington that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or __ the authorized
representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein
contained and the infonnation herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
~<'.4-L,;/. M, t·
Signature of Owner/Re; =:t /-?-(~
Date ~~ !-%-IS
STATEOFWASHINGTON)
) ss
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or ha
signed this instrument
uses and purpose m
Oat
Signature of Owner/Representafule Date
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print) \('; e.$1 A · S II.A\ -Yh
My appointment expires: __ z--'\'--2._ci_..,_/_l_v,c:._ _________ _
R:\2014\0\14069\3\Documents\SPIRY LAN DUSE PERMIT MASTER APP.doc -2 • OJ/I I
-4 --" \, ---=~CC/•-c~-c--:-.-;:
~(f L. "" ,A, d [/(5<'..
) /' h City of Renton r·· c..:;,,' (::-r,, REC'·-!~) LAND USE PERMIT ; ... ·. '•
JAN 1 4 ,_
MASTER APPLICATIO
I '.; : J
• :11~t>.:c-,~
r--u '"= ulVt:)1
PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
NAME: Roy & Kim Boyer Alpine Nursery
14609 161" Ave SE
PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
ADDRESS:
16023 SE 1441
" Street & 14609/14625161'1 Avenue SE
CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98059 Renton, WA 98059
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 766-3066
232305-9099 & 232305-9167
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
EXISTING LAND USE(S):
NAME: Single-Family Residential
PROPOSED LAND USE(S):
COMPANY (if applicable): Single-Family Residential
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
ADDRESS: RLD -Residential Low Density
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
CITY: ZIP: (if applicable)
NA
EXISTING ZONING:
TELEPHONE NUMBER: R-4
CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):
NA
NAME: Roy Boyer
SITE AREA (in square feet):
419,829
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE
COMPANY (ii applicable): DEDICATED:
124,520
14609 161" Ave SE
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS:
ADDRESS: 0
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98059 ACRE (if applicable)
3.98
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (ii applicable)
27
(425) 766-3066
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
Removal of two existing and creation of 27 new.
R:\2014\0\14069\3\Documents\BOYER LANDUSE PERMIT MASTER APP.doc-I -0311 l
r-ROJECT INFORMATION (continued) ~ _ _.,_ _____ _L_ ___________ ~
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):
Two existing units to be removed.
PROJECT VALUE:
$6,750,000.00
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): None
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): None D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO
BUILDINGS (if applicable): None
D FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft.
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA D GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft.
NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if D HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft.
applicable): NA
D SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES sq. ft.
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW
PROJECT (if applicable): NA D WETLANDS sq. ft.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
(Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included)
SITUATE IN THE NE QUARTER OF SECTION _ll_, TOWNSHIP _ll_, RANGE _5_, IN THE CITY
OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
1. (Print Name/s) 0 v Q tC!, /! i O'(efl.-, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
Washington that I am (please check one the current owner of the property involved in this application or __ the authorized
representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein
contai and t ·nforrnation herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
/, /yp, hfJ,5 -lz.
-FeP Signa ure of Owner/Representat, e
1/og/lS
l •
Date
STATEOFWASHINGTON)
) ss
COUNTY OF KING )
Dated
Notary (Print): \.(-, QD-ter\ A·
My appointment expires: _.,,2=-+/ _,'2=-9-41/_,_l_,,(p"'------------
R:\2014\0\14069\3\Documents\BOYER LANDUSE PERMIT MASTER APP.doc-2 -03/1 I
PLANNING DIVISION
WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
Drainage Report 2
~i¢~iii6oo~:Af P~1t~~iwrli1i~oo:<:: ':: ; :::'':'''::':::':::'::
Environmental Checklist •
Master Application Form•
MPrM®~(~~r~*:KPm~irffli•mBrilim~n,~i;;;;;;::::::;;::: ::;::
Neighborhood Detail Map 4
This requirement may be waived by:
1 . Property Services Section
2. Public Works Plan Review Section
3. Building Section
4. Planning Section
PROJECT NAME: ;,L/-i-?1N£ . /VU;e..[Z=~Y fiP
DATE: -~1-+1-· 7'--c,f-/_2_0~/~S~--
Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 02/08
PLANNING DIVISION
WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
.;;;;.;•.•.;;1:ANDU::::::~=~lTTAL .................... wi~m ..... iwo:~11::0. ... •·•·•·•·•·•·•·•·············coMMS'JTS'·····················
Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis •
Plat Name Reservation • .
Preapplication Meeting Summary 4
P@@Wortis MpmvaJ·I;:atten······················· ··················· ······························· .································
Rehabilitation Plan 4
Site Plan 2 AND 4
Strea~•9N,ake,$tUi:J~!;$t.intlar/l•r•••·•·•••••••••••••••••·•·•·•·••••••••••
Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 /
Stream. or tak1•i:Mtt 1matri:m::P1an.1:. U .•.•. 'UI':U:T•:::::::::::::, <:\JO'\:::::::::::: Uf/))<!':,:,:::::•<::•: ,::,·rn::rn::::.::•: : u,: :•::::::<: H•U:'H• t:::rn::::rn:•:•rn:
Street Profiles 2
Tftle}!eporfot:PlatCerttfiGate:,:::::,::••':::tmu::::•,:::•••m•: ::.::::::,:,:::::,:,:,::::•:: :::::::::::::::::rn::,:,,,, ,(:,:::,::,t:,,)UJ:f!U'U(:::•:::::rn,:::::::n:•,<::,:::n::,:n::H
Topography Map,
Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4
Utilities Plan, Generalized 2
Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4
Wellanos,Repowoermealfomp••••·•·•
··································•ui1•··············· Wireless:.
Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3
.
Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3
Lease Agreement, Draft 2ANoa
Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 ,
Map of View Area 2 AND a
Photosimulations 2ANoa
This requirement may be waived by:
1. Property Services Section
2. Public Works Plan Review Section
3. Building Section
4. Planning Section
PROJECT NAME: ffep,N~ NIA~ pP
DATE: //I /201 ,C
Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSER\/\Forms\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls · 02/08
.. ·~f> C :'; ~. 't
~, I 1. i",rfcC\ff .,Cs:"''·'~
/'(eef1",~ ~ie8
.,-I
'._ _ _,·
PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR
ALPINE NURSERY PP
PRE 14-001007
CITY OF RENTON
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division ·
August 14, 2014
Contact Information:
Planner: Rocale Timmons, 425.430.7219
Public Works Plan Reviewer: Jan Illian, 425.430.7216
Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425.430. 7024
Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430.7290
RECEIVED
JAN 1 4 2015
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider
giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the
project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use
and/or environmental permits.
Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and
schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before
making all of the required copies.
The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on
the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The
applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the
proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project
submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or
concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director,
Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development
Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council).
FIRE & EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ..... -f' cC~!J'.<>~>,,_ _ .. _ ___ ..-......-J: ~J~'l.t11.r©1tu
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 14, 2014
TO:
FROM:
Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner
Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector
Alpine Nursery PP SUBJECT:
1. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm
minim um for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet (including garage and
basements). If the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500
gpm fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required
within 300-feet of the proposed buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow
goes up to 1,500 gpm. Existing hydrants can be counted toward the
requirement as long as they meet current code, including 5-inch storz
fittings. Existing hydrants are not within 300-feet of the furthest proposed
dwellings, so new hydrants are required. A water availability certificate is
required from King County Water District 90.
2. Tl\e fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $479.28 per single
family unit. This fee is paid at time of building permit. Credit would be
granted for two existing homes to be removed.
3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be
minimum 20-feet wide fully paved, with 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside
turning radius. Fire access roadways shall be constructed to support a 30-
ton vehicle with 322-psi point loading. Access is required within 150-feet
of all points on the buildings. Dead end streets that exceed 150-feet are
required to have an approved turnaround. Cul-de-sacs are required to be
fully paved at 90-feet diameter.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
August 13, 2014
Rocale Timmons, Planner
gf4an Illian, Plan Review
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
2805 -NE s'" Street
PREB-001547
NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non-
binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review
comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by
City staff or made by the applicant.
I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal. The following comments are
based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant.
Water
1. Water service is provided by the Water District #90. A water availability certificate will be required.
2. New hydrants shall be installed pe_r Renton's fire department standards to provide the required
coverage of all lots.
3. Approved water plans shall be submitted to the City.
4. All new construction must have a fire hydrant capable of delivering a minimum of 1,000 gpm and
must be located within 300 feet of all structures.
Sanitary Sewer
1. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. There is an existing 12 -inch sewer main in st 144th
Street.
2. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges (SDC) will be based on the size of the domestic meter
that will serve the new lots. Sewer fees for a %" meter or a 1" inch meter is $2,033.00 per new single-
family lot. Fees are payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. Credit will be given to
the existing residence.
3. Extension of an 8-inch sewer main will be required on site, in 1601
h Ave SE and 161" Ave SE.
4. Short plats shall provide separate side sewer stubs to each building lot. Side sewers shall be a
minimum 2% slope.
Alpine Gardens Plat
Page2of3
August 13, 2014
5. This parcel falls within the boundaries of the Central Plateau Sewer Special Assessment District. Fee
calculated as of 8/13/2014 is $445.42 per new lot. Interest accrues at a daily rate of $0.05111 until the
fee is paid.
Storm Drainage
1. There are no storm drainage improvements fronting the site in SE 144th Ave SE, 160th Ave SE of 161
Ave SE.
2. A drainage plan and drainage report will be required with the application. The report shall comply
with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the
KCSWM, Chapter 1 and 2. All core and any special requirements shall be contained in the report. Based
on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Flow Control Duration Standard, Forested Site
Conditions. The drainage report will need to follow the area specific flow control requirements under
Core Requirement #3.
3. A geotechnical report for the site is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability
with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from
the geotechnical engineer shall be submitted with the application.
4. Surface Water System Development fees are $1,228.00 per new lot. This is payable prior to issuance
of the construction permit. Credit will be given to the existing residence.
Transportation/Street
1. Existing right of way width in SE 144th Street is 60 feet. SE 144th is classified as a collector street.
Minimum right of way width for a collector is 83 feet. To meet the City's complete street standards for
collector streets, staff will support a modification to a lesser staf}dard which would consist of half street
improvements including, but not limited to 15 feet of paving from centerline, curb and gutter, an 8 foot
planter strip, a 5 foot sidewalk, and storm drainage improvements are required to be constructed in the
right of way fronting the site per City code 4-6-060. The improvements will fit within the existing right of
way. No dedication is required in SE 144th Street.
2. Existing right of way width in 161 Ave SE is 60 feet. Minimum right of way width for residential
access roads is 53 feet. To meet the City's complete street standards for residential access roads, half
street improvements including, but not limited to 13 feet of paving from centerline, curb and gutter, an
8 foot planter strip, a 5 foot sidewalk, and storm drainage improvements are required to be constructed
along the project side fronting 14625 and 14609 -161" Ave SE. To build this street 23 feet of right of
way dedication will be required.
3. Existing right of way width in 160 Ave SE is 30 .feet. Minimum right of way width for residential access
roads is 53 feet. To meet the City's complete street standards for residential access roads, half street
improvements including, but not limited to 13 feet of paving from centerline, curb and gutter, an 8 foot
planter strip, a 5 foot sidewalk, and storm drainage improvements are required to be constructed along
the project side. To build this street 23 feet of right of way dedication will be required.
4. LED street lighting is required along all street frontages and inside the plat.
5. Corner lots require a minimum radius of 15 feet of dedication.
6. The current transportation impact fee rate is $1,430.72 per new single family house. The
transportation impact fee that is current at the time of building permit application will be levied.
Payment of the transportation impact fee is due at the time of issuance of the building permit. Credit
will be given to the existing home.
Alpine Gardens Plat
Page 3 of 3
August 13, 2014
7. A traffic impact analysis is required when estimated vehicular traffic generated from a proposed
development exceeds 20 vehicles per hour in either the AM (6:00 -9:00) or PM (3:00 -6:00) peak
periods. A peak hour volume of 20 vehicles per hour would relate to daily volume of approximately 200
vehicles per day. Generally this includes residential plats of 20 lots or more and commercial sites that
generate 20 vehicles per hour. naffic study guidelines are included with the pre-application packet. The
traffic analysis should include the intersection at 156'• Ave SE and SE 142 Street.
General Comments
1. All construction utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan
submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a
licensed Civil Engineer.
2. When the utility plans are complete, please submit two {2) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of
the drainage report, permit application and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application
fee at the counter on the sixth floor.
3. A fee increase is expected January 2014.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 14, 2014
TO: Pre-Application File No. 14-001007
FROM: Rocale Timmons, Senfor Planner
SUBJECT: Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat (SE 144"' St and 160"' Ave SE)
General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-
referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting
issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant
and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information
contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official
decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community & Economic Development Administrator,
Public Works Administrator, Planning Director, Development Services Director, and City
Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other
design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to
review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are
available for purchase for $SO.OO plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall
or on line at www.rentonwa.gov
Project Proposal: The subject property is a collection of three parcels located approximately on
the south side of SE 144"' St between 160"' Ave SE and 161" Ave SE. The proposed property is
located within the City's Potential Annexation Area and is part of the pending Alpine Nursery
Annexation. The 9.19 acre site is pre-zoned R-4. The applicant is proposing a 27 lot subdivision
for the eventual development of detached single-family homes. Access to the plat is proposed
via an extension of 161" Ave SE and a partial extension of 160"' Ave SE. Internal circulation
terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern portion of the property. The southern portion of the
site contains grid connection from 160'h to 161" Ave SE aligned with SE 146'h Place. There
appears to be no critical areas located on site.
Current Use: The site currently contains a commercial nursery and two single family homes. All
existing structures are proposed to be demolished.
Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is currently located within Unincorporated
King County. The property has been pre-zoned R-4 and should it annex into the City would
assume the R-4 zoning classification.
The maximum density for this property would be 4.0 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac). The
area of public and private streets and critical areas would be deducted from the gross site area
to determine the "net' site area prior to calculating density. The area located within the private
access easements and right-of-way dedications was not provided with the pre-application
packet and therefore the net density could not be calculated.
h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\14-0001007.rocale\14-001007 {r4 access, alpine pp).doc
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
Page 2 of 4
August 14, 2014
Using the gross square footage the 27 lot proposal arrives at a gross density of approximately
2.93 du/ac (27 lots/ 9.19 acres= 2.93 du/ac). The applicant will be required to comply with the
density requirements of the R-4 zoning designation using the net site area.
Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-llOA, "Development
Standards for Single Family Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete application
(noted as "R-4 standards" herein).
Minimum Lot Size. Width and Depth-The minimum lot size permitted in the R-4 is 8,000 square
feet. A minimum lot width of 70 feet is required for interior lots and 80 feet for corner lots. A
lot depth of 80 feet is required. The proposal appears to comply with the Jot standards of the
code as designed.
Building Standards -R-4 zone allows a maximum building coverage of 35% of the lot area or
2,500 square feet, whichever is greater for lots over S,000 square feet in size. The maximum
impervious surface would be limited to 55%. Building height is restricted to 30 feet from
existing grade. The proposal's compliance with the building standards would be verified at the
time of building permit review for the new residences to be located on all lots.
Building Design Standards -All single family residences would be subject to the Residential
Design Standards outlined in RMC 4-2-115. The proposal's compliance with the residential
design standards would be verified at the time of building permit review for the new
residences to be located on all lots.
!setbacks -Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint and the __ ... ---·{ Comment
L-----------------------------__ . _ .. -------· ----------· ...... -----· -----------. ----· -------• --...... -___ •• -.• -• ----___ •. _. --···· _ --···------------. ___ ~ .
property line and any private access easement. The required setbacks in the R-4 zone are 30
feet for the front yard and 20 feet for side yard along-a-street setbacks. The rear yard setback is
required to be 25 feet. Interior side yards are required to have 5 foot setbacks. The setbacks
for the new residences would be reviewed at the time of building permit.
Access/Parking: Access to the plat is proposed via an extension of 161" Ave SE and a partial
extension of 160th Ave SE. Internal circulation terminates in a cul-de-sac in the northern portion
of the property. The southern portion of the site contains grid connection from 1601h to 161''
Ave SE aligned with SE 146'h Place.
All abutting rights-of-way and new rights-of-way dedicated as part of the plat are required to be
graded to their full width and the pavement, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be constructed as
specified in the street standards RMC 4-6-060. The proposal would be required to be revised in
order to include a full extension of 16d" Ave SE to -the southern property line and the
construction of improvements on all street frontages. A street modification could be applied
for concurrently with the Preliminary Plat application in order to eliminate the requirement for
frontage improvements. However, at this time there does·not appear to be compliance with
the street modification criteria.
Additionally, cul-de-sac and dead end streets are limited in application and may only be
permitted by the Administrator where, due to demonstrable physical-constraints, no future
connection to a larger street pattern is physically possible. The proposal does not provide a
complete grid system that includes links to the existing portion of the grid system in SE 145th
Place. Therefore, the applicant would be required to demonstrate that a reduction in the
number of linkages is appropriate in this case due to site constraints in order to eliminate the
need for an additional connection to SE 145th Place.
h:\ced\plannlng\current plannlng\preapps\14-0001007.rocale\14--001007 (r4 access, alpine pp).doc
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
Page3of4
August 14, 2014
Additionally, staff would be prefer a connection to SE 145"' Place in place of the connection to
SE 146"' Place. [The retention of existing trees can be used to justify the use of a flexible grid
system that does not include a.SE 146th Place connection~--------------------------------------------------------------------
Driveways: The maximum driveway slopes cannot exceed 15%, provided that driveways
exceeding 8% are to provide slotted drains at the lower end of the driveway. If the grade
exceeds 15%, a variance is required.
Landscaping: Except for critical areas, all portions of the development area not covered by
structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped with
native, drought-resistant vegetative cover. The development standards require that all pervious
areas within the property boundaries be landscaped_ The minimum on-site landscape width
required along street frontages is 10 feet.
Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070} for further general and specific landscape
requirements (enclosed).
Pursuant to Cl-38 up to a 15-foot wide landscape buffer is required along the perimeter of the
drainage facility.
Significant Tree Retention: If significant trees (greater than 6-inch caliper) are proposed to be
removed a tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree retention worksheet shall
be provided with the formal land use application. The tree retention plan must show
-preservation of at least 30 percent of significant trees, and indicate how proposed building
footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant trees that would be
retained. If the trees cannot be retained, they may be replaced with minimum 2 inch caliper
trees at a ratio of six to one: Tree retention standards shall be applied to the net developable
area. Land within critical areas and their buffers, as well as public rights-of-way. There is not a
threshold for replacement trees however the following criteria, found in RMC 4-4-130, will have
to be met:
1. The land clearing and tree removal will not create or contribute to landslides,
accelerated soil creep, settlement and subsidence or hazards associated with strong
ground motion and soil liquefaction.
2. The land clearing and tree removal will not create or contribute to flooding, erosion, or
increased turbidity, siltation or other form of pollution in a watercourse.
3. , Land clearing and tree removal will be conducted to maintain or provide visual
screening and buffering between land uses of differing intensity, consistent with
applicable landscaping and setback provisions of the Renton Municipal Code.
4. Land clearing and tree removal shall be conducted so as to expose the smallest practical
area of soil to erosion for the least possible time, consistent with an approved build-out
schedule and including any necessary erosion control measures.
S. Land clearing and tree removal shall be consistent with subsection D2 of this Section,
Restrictions for Critical Areas -General, and RMC 4-3-0SO, Critical Areas Regulations.
6. Retained trees will not create or contribute to a hazardous condition as the result of
blowdown, insect or pest infestation, disease, or other problems that may be created as
a result of selectively removing trees and other vegetation from a lot.
h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\14-0001007.rocale\14-001007 (r4 access, alpine pp).doc
Comment
connection al
you?
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
Page 4 of4
August 14, 2014
7. Land clearing and tree removal shall be conducted to maximize the preservation of any
tree in good health that is an outstanding specimen because of its size, form, shape,
age, color, rarity, or other distinction as a community landmark.
Critical Areas: There appears to be no critical areas located on site. It is the applicant's
responsibility to ascertain whether or not critical areas are located on site.
Environmental Review: Environmental (SEPA) Review is required for projects greater than nine
lots, or on sites that contain critical areas. Therefore SEPA would be ·required for the proposed
subdivision.
Permit Requirements: The p~oject would require Preliminary Plat review, Environmental (SEPA)
Review, and a Street Modification. With concurrent review of these applications, the process
would take an estimated time frame of 12 weeks. After the required notification period, the
Environmental Review Committee would issue a Threshold Determination for the project.
When the required two-week appeal period is completed, the project would go before the
Hearing Examiner. Once the Hearing Examiner issues a decision a two-week appeal period will
commence. The fee for the Preliminary Plat is $4,000.00 and the fee for Environmental Review
is $1,000.00. The fee for a street modification is $100.00. A 3% technology fee would also be
assessed at the time ofland use application.
The applicant will be required to install a public information sign on the property. Detailed
information regarding the land use application submittal. requirements is provided in the
attached handouts. Once Preliminary Plat approval is obtained, the applicant must complete the
required improvements and dedications, as well as satisfy any conditions of the preliminary
approval before submitting for Final Plat review. Once final approval is received, the plat may
be recorded. The newly created lots may only be sold after the plat has been recorded.
Fees: In In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, the following impact fees
would be required prior to the issuance of building permits (these fees may change in 2015):
• A Fire Mitigation fee of $479.28 per new single family residence; and
• A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $1,430.72 per new single family
residence; and
• A Parks Mitigation Fee based on $963.01 per new single family residence; and
• A School District Impact Fee based on $5,730 per new single family residence.
A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is attached for your review.
Expiration: The preliminary plat approval is valid for seven years ..
h:\ced\plannl ng\current planning\preapps\14-0001007.rocale\14-001007 (r4 access, a I pine pp).doc
[111:l)l
January 12, 2015 DRS Project No. 14069
CITY OF RENTON
PROJECT NARRATIVE
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ALPINE NURSERY
The project is a proposed single-family residential development of 9.64 acres, known as
Tax Parcel Numbers 232305-9044, -9099, and -9167 into 27 single-family residential
lots. The property is located at 16023 SE 1441h Street and 14609/14625 161"1 Avenue
SE in the City of Renton, Washington. All existing improvements on Site will be
demolished or removed during plat construction.
Project Contact Information:
Developer:
Engineer/Surveyor:
Land Use Permits Required:
-Preliminary Plat Approval
-Final Plat Approval
-Environmental Review
Zoning and Density:
Roy Boyer
14609 161"1 Street SE
Renton, WA 98059
(425) 766-3066
D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
620 th Avenue
Kirkland, WA 98033
(425) 827-3063
Maher A. Joudi, P.E.
-Grading Permit
-Building Permit
The property and adjacent properties are zoned R-4.
Current use of Site and existing improvements:
The current Site contains two single family residences with associated driveways.
The Site also includes a plant nursery with associated green houses and driveways.
The remainder of the Site is bramble, pasture and an area of trees on the southern
parcels. All existing improvements will be removed. All existing vegetation and
trees shall be removed with the exception of 102 significant trees.
RECEIVED ~' )::, irh .'\\.,,,11J·:-
:< kian.t \\i,\ ssc1::3
JAN l 4 2015 H,,,,,,. ''"'' s2· rno:s
;;?A (J)J) 8)7-)4} :l
ru ,--,-,_·:· ::,3co·1 SG2 ~LlO:j/
CITY 0r ;:,,,,;TON
PLANNING DIVISION
Page 2 of3
Special Site features:
None
Soil Type and Drainage Conditions:
Per the King County Soil Survey, onsite soil consists of EvB, Everett gravelly sandy
loam with slopes ranging from 0-5%. Majority of Site runoff sheet flows to the
southwest towards the south property line and then discharges into neighboring
properties to the south. Runoff continues to the existing conveyance system in the
cul-de-sac in 160th Place SE. Approximately 0.4 acres of the northeast portion of
the project area flows north into the conveyance system in SE 144th Street and flows
west.
Proposed Use of Property:
The Project is the subdivision of three existing parcels zoned R4 (9.64 ac. total) into
27 single-family residential lots, per the City of Renton's subdivision process. This
will result in a net density of 3.98 dwelling units per acre. Lot square footages range
from 8,000 to 13,369 s.f., with no lot sizes below the minimum 8,000 s.f. threshold
set by the City.
Access, Traffic, and Circulation:
The Project will locate its access road as depicted on the attached plan. The project
will locate its internal residential roads as depicted on the attached plan. Access to
the subdivision will be from 160th Avenue SE and 161st Avenue SE via 53' rights-of-
way. A cul de sac will be provided near the northern end of the property. No lots
will be allowed to access off of SE 144th Street. It appears that there are no deeds
dedicating the western 30-feet of right of way on 161 st Avenue SE (as shown on City
and County maps), therefore the property boundary extends to the centerline of said
right of way. There may be a prescriptive easement for improvements on 161st that
encroach into said property, however no legal documents could be found. The
project will dedicate the eastern 30 feet of said parcel and the eastern 23 feet of the
southern two-parcels.
Proposed Site and Offsite Improvements:
Half street improvements on SE 144th Street, 160th Avenue SE, and 161st Avenue
SE will be installed. SE 1441h Street will provide 15 feet of pavement width from
centerline of right of way to face of curb (34.5 feet total pavement) and will install
curb, gutter, 5 foot sidewalk and 8 foot planter strip on the south side of SE 144th
Street as per City requirements. This will require dedication of 30-foot prescriptive
easement along the north property line. 160th Avenue SE will provide 20 feet of
pavement width to face of curb and will install curb, gutter, 5 foot sidewalk and 8 foot
planter strip on the east side of 160th Avenue SE as per City requirements; this will
require a 23-to 35-foot right of way dedication (30-feet of right of way exists west of
the Site for the northern 660 feet). 161 51 Avenue SE will provide 13 feet of
pavement width from centerline of right of way to face of curb (28'-30' total
pavement) and will install curb, gutter, 5 foot sidewalk and 8 foot planter strip on the
west side of 161st Avenue SE as per City requirements; this will require a 26.5' right
of way dedication along the southern parcel frontage. An existing water main in SE
144th Street and 161 51 Avenue SE will be tapped to serve the proposed
Page3 of3
development. Sanitary Sewer will be extended from the north from an existing
sanitary sewer manhole in SE 1441
h Street. An infiltration pond is proposed within
Tract "B" to serve the subdivision with a proposed conveyance system from the
Site's southeastern property corner through 161 51 Avenue SE approximately 350
feet offsite. This conveyance system will serve as an emergency overflow system
for the infiltration facility. The Project will meet the drainage requirements of the
2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (Manual), as adopted by the City.
The project will locate a job shack on the Site as prescribed by the contractor during
construction.
Model homes will be built, however, the lots on which these homes will be built has
not been determined at this time.
Cut Materials:
Approximately 18,590 c.y. of cut and 14,310 c.y. of fill is computed for the Project.
The net export volume is approximately 4,280 c.y.
Tree Inventory:
102 of the existing 598 significant trees will be retained onsite. 246 trees are within
proposed right of way and 14 trees are dead, diseased or dying. This equates to
30.2% retained; see tree retention spreadsheet.
Estimated Construction Cost & Proposed Market Value:
The approximate construction cost is typical of a subdivision of this size and nature
totaling approximately $2,515,000. The estimated fair market value of the proposed
project is approximately $6,750,000.
January 12, 2015
Project No. 14069
CITY OF RENTON
CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION REPORT
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ALPINE NURSERY
The following is a report of expected construction dates and times, as well as
proposed hauling/transportation routes, ESC measures and traffic control plan.
Proposed Construction Dates:
Hours and Days of Operation:
Clearing, Grading, Utilities and Roads
April-September 2016
Home Construction: September 2016-2017
Monday -Friday, Hours to meet guidelines set
forth by City ordinance
Proposed Hauling/Transportation Routes: West on SE 1441h Street, north
on 1561h Ave SE to NE 4m Street and west to 1-405. Alternatively, trucks may head
north on 1561h Ave SE and head west on SE 142"d Place, south to SE Renton-Maple
Valley Road (SR-169).
ESC Measures: The Erosion and Sedimentation Control Design elements as listed
in SECTION VIII (PART A) of the Technical Information Report shall be
implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud,
noise, and other noxious characteristics during Site construction.
Special hours: No special hours proposed for construction at this time.
Preliminary Traffic Control Plan: See attached
RECEIVED
JAN 1 4 2015
CITY I .. ,,;_ "'~"'TON J. ~ ,~\;t'. f'l1
PlANNING DIVISION
t,:,(1 /-(!1 /.A,;,_····ur·
(_i1 !· , , ·ii, \:',/1\ '-frF>l;
r0 11c,1-,L:C: ,;,v::;; f:27-_Df::3
i-,,x. (4.?:>:· 827 242;
.J__
(')
"Cl '.1 <-s; • ~ 2 ) ~ -~ ,
~ ,I>,-s ~ "" • = i ~ \ '-" ( ) ,. -
f-
~ [D) tROOJ ~sm:~NEERS
ENGINEERS PIANNER8 -
elm • 7fh AVEM/E KIRKLAND. WA '1/JO!U
0"'21UJ27.3Dtl1l F "2AZT .M:/3
LEGEND:
m WORK AREA
NOTES:
!it'L l~i
1. FLDODLJGHTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO MARK FLAGGER STA TTONS AT
NIGHT.
2. SIGN SEQUENCE IS THE SAME FOR BOTH DIRECTIONS OF TRAVEL
3. STE:ADY BURNING WARNING UGHTS (TrPE C, MUTCD) SHOUW 8£
USED TO MARK CHANNEUZING DEV/SES AT NIGHT AS NEEDED.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CJ~ 48 HOURS NOTICE TO THE OWNERS OF
PRIVATE DRIVES BEFORE INTERFERING WITH THEM.
5. ACCESS FOR FTRE-FTGHTING EOUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL
TIMES. AND THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR DEVELOPER SHALL KEEP THE
LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION AUTHORl71ES INFORMED AT AU. 11MES OF THE
LOCA TTON OF CONSTRUCTTON OPERATIONS ANO FIRE LANES.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT1FY THE AUTHORJllES IN CHARGE OF
ANY MUNICIPAL, PR/VA 7E. OR SCHOOL TRANSPORT A 710N SYSm.lS AT
LEAST ONE KffJ< IN ADVANCE OF ROAD CLOSURES THAT l+t'LL FORCE A
CHANG£ IN THE REGULAR RDUT1NG OF THE TRANSPORTA T/ON SYSTEM.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHAU CONDUCT HIS WORK SO AS TO INTERFERE
AS UTTlE AS POSSIBLE WITH PUBLIC TRA \£1. AND SHALL., AT HIS OKN
EXPENSE, PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN SUITABLE BRIDGES, DETOURS. OR
OTHER TEMPORARY FACfUTJES FOR 1HE ACCOMMODA TTON OF PUBUC OR
PRIVATE 1RA\£L. INCLUDING MAIL DEUVER'f.
B. ROADWAY CROSSINGS SHALL BE MADE IN SUCH A WAY 1HA T NO
MORE THAN HALF OF 7HE ROADWAY IS CLOSED TO TRAfflC AT ANY TTME
EXCEPT WHEN SUJTABLE DETOURS OR OTHER ARRANGEMENTS AREA
AGREED TO.
9. WORK SHAU NOT BE STARTED ON ANY PUBUC OR PRIVATE
RIGHT-OF-WAY UNTJL CLEARANCE IS G/1/f:N TO THE CONJRACTOR BY THE
DISTRICT. UNLESS OTHER'MSE DIRECTED IN 'M?ITTNG BY THE DIS7RICT.
THE CONTRACTOR SHAU LIMIT HIS MJRKJNG HOURS TO THE GOVERNING
AUTHORITTES STANDARDS.
10. NO EXCAVA TTON OF ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED IN THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
11. STREET s~s SHAU BE EMPLO'fllJ DAILY DURING EXCAVAT10N
TO REMOVE DIRT FROM THE RIGHT-or-WAY.
12. HOURS or WORK: 7 A.M. TO .J P.M. ~DAYS.
-:_,_11'-
I I
~
NOR.TH
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 75 150 225
1 INCH= 150 FT.
R: \2014\0\14069\.J\Drawings\Plots\PP\ Traffic Control Plon\01-.JTCP14069.dwg 1/13/2015 .J:04:45 PM PST
COPYRIGHT @ 2014, D.R. S1RONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS: INC.
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
ALPINE NURSERY
16023 SE 144TH ST & 14609114625161ST AVE SE
RENTON, WA 98059
DRAF7EIJ BY: 'r1..P
DESIGN£D BY: 'r1..P
PROJECT ENG!NffR: MAJ
DATE: 01. 14. 15
PROJECT NO.: 14069
DRA'MNG: 1
SHEET: 1 )
~
~
" >-l "'
' iJj ~ ~ z
w z
§
"
<lolll_O.,._ ..... Dlg
--!!'~---G)
• ' I
' !
~ D.~S"'°"" C<>NS<A.nNG ENGWEERS ---.. ,,,. ___ _
o_.,...,__, ""
NE 7/4 SECTION ~ TOWNSHIP -~ ., T N. RANGE s £. W.AI.
ALPINE NURSERY
~\~I ;:::'.;=I ~o mJ I 1 / 1 I I/~ 'Y.t--1-1 I 11 I ""
~~'If~ 1~§§'§3 _1 \1 I ~,J~l I I i ! !
ttQl,;; • I I I I I , ! ! ---a,------
-,. --* : --:.. I --= wr I o,,,r
_,.., ____ '
,!lln Cl TY OF
~ RENTON
ALPINE NURSERY
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIi. MAP
Pla-.,/9"'1~"'9/l'u~I< -· Oopl.
CT:/v"'tb
JAN 1 4 2015
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
@
NOR.TH
~;;J,.">•COCJ,i.C
~
City of Renton
TREE RETENTIONREC~l\/ED
JAN 1 4 2015
WORKSHEET CITY OF RENTON
1. Total number of trees over 6" in diameter1 on project site: 1. 598 trees
2. Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation:
Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2 14 trees
Trees in proposed public streets 246 trees
Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts O trees
Trees in critical areas3 and buffers O trees
Total number of excluded trees:
3. Subtract line 2 from line 1:
2.
3.
260 trees
338 trees
4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained 4 , multiply line 3 by:
0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, or R-8
0.1 in all other residential zones
0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. 101.4 trees
5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing 5 to retain 4:
5. 102 trees
6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced:
(If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required).
6. 0 trees
7. Multiply line 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches:
7. 0
8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement:
inches
(Minimum 2·· caliper trees required) 8. __ ..,O:..._ __ inches
9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees 6:
(if remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number)
1. Measured at chest height.
9.
per tree
_.,.o __ trees
2
· Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or
certified arborist, and approved by the City.
3
· Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Section 4-3-050 of
the Renton Municipal Code (RMC).
4
· Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers.
s_ The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of
trees per R MC 4-4-130H7 a
5
· Inches of street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retained on site that
are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement.
R: \20 14 \0\ 14069\3 \Documents\ W orksheets\T reeRetention Worksheet 14069 .doc 12/08
DENSITY
WORKSHEET
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
1. Gross area of property: 1. 419,829
2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations.
These include:
Public streets**
Private access easements**
Critical Areas*
Total excluded area:
3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area:
4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage:
5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned:
124 520 square feet
square feet
square feet
2. 124 520
3. 295 309
4. 6.78
5. 27
square feet
square feet
square feet
acres
units/lots
6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. 3.98 = dwelling units/acre
*Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for
development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations
including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways."
Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. RECEIVED
** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. JAN 1 4 2015
CIT" " .. ~-· ·--.'
R:\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\density.doc Last updated: 11/08/2004 1
•
January 12, 2015 Project No. 14069
CITY OF RENTON
SCHOOL WALKWAY ANALYSIS
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ALPINE NURSERY
The project is a proposed single-family residential development of 9.64 acres, known
as Tax Parcels Numbers 232305-9044, -9099, and -9167 into 27 single-family
residential lots. The property is located at 16023 SE 1441
h Street and 14609/14625
161st Avenue SE in the City of Renton, Washington.
Project Contact Information:
Developer: Roy Boyer
14609161'1 Avenue SE
Renton, WA 98059
(425) 766-3066
Engineer/Surveyor: D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
620 7th Avenue
Kirkland, WA 98033
(425) 827-3063
Maher A. Joudi, P.E.
Overview:
The proposed subdivision is within Issaquah School District #411 and the fol lowing are
the public schools of residence for students within this subdivision:
Briarwood Elementary -17020 SE 1341
h Street, WA 98059
Maywood Middle -14490 1681h Avenue SE, Renton, WA 98059
Liberty High School -16655 SE 1361h Street, Renton, WA 98059
Bus service is provided to Briarwood Elementary and Liberty High School. Elementary
school students in the new subdivision will have to walk to the intersection of SE 1441
h
Street and 1601h Avenue SE (NW corner of the project Site) to catch the bus. Students
attending Liberty High School will have to walk to the intersection of SE 1441
h Street
and 161 st Avenue SE (NE corner of the project Site) to catch the bus. Students
attending Maywood Middle School will walk east approximately 0.5 miles along SE
144th Street. Students will cross 161 51 Avenue SE and walk along the south side of SE
144th Street to 1681h Avenue SE which is the entrance to Maywood Middle School.
RECEIVED
JAi~ 1 4 2015
CIT'>' ()t ,; ''"'I\!
PLAl\i1\;1.;,;v ~i·~ ,.:,,,_,;-,j
Page2 of6
The following includes pictures and descriptions of the walking path for students
attending Maywood Middle School.
Route to Maywood Middle School:
1 -At the northeast corner of the Site students will walk along the south side of SE
1441h Street and first cross SE 161'' Avenue.
Page 3 of6
~ ··.-=·--. ~· '-···· ·-·· ' ._ -
2 -The south shoulder of SE 1441
h Street is 9.5' from the fogline to the edge of
pavement.
3 -Students will then cross 1641h Place SE and walk along the south side which
includes 1' from fogline to the edge of pavement and 6' of gravel to the edge of a grass
ditch.
\ Page4 of6
4 -This is a view of the south side of SE 1441
h Street facing west. This shows the 1'
fogline to edge of pavement and the 6' gravel shoulder between the edge of pavement
and the grass.
•
• Page 5 of6
5 -There is a 'pedestrian crossing advanced warning' sign located at the intersection
of SE 1441h Street and 1651h Place SE. There is a 20 mph speed limit sign with
flashing lights at the south part of the intersection between SE 1441h Street and 1661h
Place SE. The south side of SE 1441h Street has between 0.5' and 1' from fogline to the
edge of pavement and 5' to 6' of a gravel shoulder from 1651
h Place SE to 166 1
h Place
SE. From 1661
h Place SE east towards 16ih Place SE the gravel shoulder is
approximately 10' wide.
I . .
.. 1, ~--~ '.;
6-This is the view of SE 1441h Street facing west in between 16ih Place SE and 1681h
Avenue SE (the entrance to Maywood Middle School). It is 5' from the fogline to the
face of curb, 0.5' wide curb, with a 5' wide sidewalk.
,.
Page 6 of6
7 -This the view of the intersection of SE 1441h Street and 168 1
h Avenue SE (facing
east) which is the entrance to the school.
R:\2014\0\ 140691.3\Documents\Reports\Preliminary\School Walkway Analysis 14069. doc
' ..
January 9, 2015
ES-3377.02
Mr. Roy Boyer
14609-161 61 Avenue Southeast
Renton, Washington 98059
RECEl\1ED
JAN l 4 2015
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
Subject: Alpine Nursery -Boyer Properties
Infiltration Evaluation
16023 Southeast 144th Street
Renton, Washington
Dear Mr. Boyer:
Earth Solutions NW LLC
• Geotechnical Engineering
• Construction Monitoring
• Environmental Sciences
As requested, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has prepared this letter summarizing our
findings regarding stormwater infiltration for the subject site.
The subject site is located on the south side of Southeast 144th Street; and east of 160th
Avenue Southeast in Renton, Washington. The site is occupied by two residential structures
and a plant nursery.
The subject site is located in an area in which glacial outwash (geologic map designation, Qgo)
soil has been identified on the geologic maps which ESNW used as a reference prior to the site
exploration.
A representative of ESNW was on-site to observe the subsurface conditions in December of
2014, and January of 2015. ESNW observed the excavation of eight test pits using hand tools,
as well as an excavator and operator, contracted by ESNW, throughout the stormwater pond
footprint in southern portion of the subject site. The test pits were advanced to approximately
13 feet deep into the native soil. ESNW observed poorly graded gravel (Unified Soil
Classification, GP), and well graded gravel (GW) in a dense condition at all three test locations
at the bottom-of-pond elevation. The well graded gravel contained a fines content of about 2.6
percent and 2.3 percent; and a USDA description of Extremely Gravelly Coarse Sand. Please
see the soil logs later in this report for a detailed description of the subsurface conditions.
EPA falling head infiltration testing was performed within the well graded sand and gravel soils
in three of the test pits. The excavations were terminated in the well graded sand and gravel
soils at maximum of 15 feet below existing grade, which equates to a minimum of six feet below
bottom-of-pond elevation. The soil conditions which ESNW observed were consistent with the
geologic map designation of glacial outwash.
No groundwater was observed at the test pits during our fieldwork (December 2014 and
January 2015). No confining soil layer was encountered to an elevation six feet below the pond
bottom.
1805 • 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711
' '
~-
Mr. Roy Boyer
January 9, 2015
Infiltration Testing
ES-3377.02
Page 2
The infiltration testing was performed in general accordance with the 2005 DOE Stormwater
Management Manual for Western Washington (DOE), Section 3.6. ESNW representatives
conducted a site visit on December 24, 2014 to excavate test pits using a trackhoe and
operator retained by ESNW, at locations within the potential infiltration areas. EPA falling-head
infiltration testing was conducted during our site visit.
Measured Infiltration Rates
Testing was completed within the well graded gravel soils in order to demonstrate the infiltration
rates at the bottom-of-pond soil types. The measured infiltration rates were 70 in/hour within
the undisturbed native soils.
If you have questions or require additional information, please call.
Sincerely,
EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC
Attachment: Test Pit Logs
cc: D.R. Strong
Kyle R. Campbell, P.E.
Principal
Attention: Mr. Maher Joudi (Email only)
Earth Solutions NW, LLC
, .
TP-101
Soil Type
Loose Topsoil
Medium Dense
Silty Sand with Gravel
Dense Poorly Graded
Gravel
TP-102
Soil Type
Loose Topsoil
Medium Dense Silty
Sand with Gravel
Dense Poorly Graded
Gravel
TP-103
Soil Type
Loose Topsoil
Medium Dense Silty
Sand with Gravel
Dense Well Graded
Gravel
TP-104
Soil Type
Loose Topsoil
Medium Dense Silty
Sand with Gravel
Dense Well Graded
Gravel
Dense Well Graded
Sand
TP-105
Soil Type
Loose Topsoil
Medium Dense Silty
Sand with Gravel
Dense Well Graded
Gravel
Dense Poorly Graded
Sand
Dense Well Graded
Sand
Depth
0'-6"
6"-3'
3'-6'
Depth
0'-6"
6"-3'
3'-6.5'
Depth
0'-6"
6"-3'
3'-13'
Depth
0'-6"
6"-3'
3'-10'
10'-12'
Depth
0'-6"
6"-3'
3'-6'
6'-6.5'
Test Pit Logs
ES-3377.02
6.5'-15'
Earth Solutions NW, LLC
January 12, 2015
ES-3377.02
Earth Solutions NW LLC
Mr. Roy Boyer
14609-161st Avenue Southeast
Renton, Washington 98059
RECEIVED
JAN 1 4 2015
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
Subject: Alpine Nursery -Boyer Properties
16023 Southeast 144th Street
Renton, Washington
Reference: Earth Solutions NW, LLC
Geotechnical Engineering Study
ES-3377, June 5, 2014
Dear Mr. Boyer:
• Geotechnical Engineering
• Construction Monitoring
• Environmental Sciences
As requested, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has reviewed the referenced geotechnical
engineering study with respect to the applicability of the report to the currently proposed project.
Based on our review, the recommendations included in the report remain applicable to the
currently proposed project.
If you have questions or require additional information, please call.
Sincerely,
EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC
Kyle R. Campbell, P.E.
Principal
cc: D.R. Strong
Attention: Mr. Maher Joudi (Email only)
1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711
DRS Project No. 14069
CITY OF RENTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ALPINE NURSERY
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental
impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if
available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address
the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be
prepared to further analyze the proposal.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for
some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can
explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also
attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in
the decision-making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them
over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information
that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which
you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional
information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse
impact.
© 2015 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
SEPA Checklist Page 1 of 25
RECEIVED
JAN I 4 2015
CITY or RIE/IITON
PLANNING DIVISION
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
City of Renton, Washington
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Alpine Nursery
2. Name of applicant:
Roy Boyer
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Applicant:
Roy Boyer
14609 161 51 Avenue SE
Renton, Washington 98059
(425) 766-3066
Contact Person:
Maher A. Joudi, P.E.
D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
620 7th Ave
Kirkland, WA 98033
425 827 -3063
4. Date checklist prepared:
January 6, 2015
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including
phasing, if applicable):
Construction will start upon the receipt of
all required building and construction
permits. This is estimated to occur in the
spring of 2016.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions,
expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this Proposal? If yes, explain.
Construct 27 single-family residences.
© 2015 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
$EPA Checklist Page 2 of 25
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
City of Renton Washington
8. List any environmental information you know
about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this Proposal.
Arborist Report: GreenForest, Inc.
Geotechnical Report: Earth Solutions NW, LLC
Infiltration Evaluation: Earth Solutions NW, LLC
Traffic Impact Analysis: Traffex
Critical Areas Report: Re-Align Environmental
Level One Downstream Analysis: D. R. STRONG Consulting
Engineers Inc.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending
for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your
Proposal? If yes, explain.
None to our knowledge.
10. List any government approvals or permits that
will be needed for your proposal, if known.
SEPA Determination
Preliminary Subdivision Approval
Grading Permit
Final Subdivision Approval
Building Permit
Other Customary Construction Related Permits
General Construction Stormwater Permit
11. Give brief, complete description of your
proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site. There are several
questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to
include additional specific information on
project description.).
Subdivide approximately 9.64 acres into 27
single-family lots with a proposed net
density of 3.98 du per acre. Access to the
subdivision will be from 1601h Avenue SE
and 161 51 Avenue SE.
© 2015 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
SEPA Checklist Page 3 of 25
City of Renton
City of Renton
City of Renton
City of Renton
City of Renton
City of Renton
Department of
Ecology
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
City of Renton Washington
12. Location of the Proposal. Give sufficient
information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project,
including a street address, if any, and section,
township, and range, if known. If a Proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the
range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a
legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and
topographic map, if reasonably available.
While you should submit any plans required by
the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any
permit applications related to this checklist.
The Project is located in the NE Y. of
Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 5
East. The Site is located at 16023 SE 144th
Street and 14609/14625 161st Avenue SE
Renton, Washington.
© 2015 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
SEPA Checklist Page 4 of 25
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
City of Renton Washington
8. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a.
moun ainous er.
In general, the majority of the
property has slopes that range
between 5 to 10%. Generally, the
land slopes from the northeast
corner of the site to the southwest.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site
(approximate percent slope)?
There is a small portion near the
center of the Site with slopes ranging
between 15% and 20%.
c. What general types of soils are found
on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the
classification of agricultural soils, specify
them and note any agricultural land of
long-term commercial significance and
whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils.
The soils on the Site are mapped in
the Soil Survey of King County,
Washington, prepared by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Soil
Conservation Service and has
classified the Site as Everett Series,
slopes 0-5% (EvB), gravelly sandy
loam. Additionally, see attached
Geotechnical Report dated June 5,
2014.
d. Are there surface indications or history
of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
None to our knowledge.
© 2015 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
SEPA Checklist Page 5 of 25
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
City of Renton Washington
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area
and approximate quantities and total
affected area of any filling, excavation,
and grading proposed. Indicate source
of fill.
The purpose of the site grading will
be to construct the subdivision
roads, utilities and homes.
Approximately 18,590 c.y. of cut and
14,310 c.y. of fill is computed for the
Project. The net volume is
approximately 4,280 c.y. of cut.
Select fill material will be imported as
well as the possibility of exporting
unwanted soils.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of
clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
There could be a short-term increase
in the potential for on-site erosion
where soils are exposed during site
preparation and construction;
however, the Project will comply with
all applicable erosion control
measures, short term and long term.
g. About what percent of the site will be
covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example,
asphalt or buildings)?
Approximately 65% of the Site will be
covered by impervious surfaces.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control
erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if
any:
A temporary erosion control plan will
be implemented at the appropriate
time. Erosion control measures may
include the following: hay bales,
siltation fences, temporary siltation
ponds, controlled surface grading,
stabilized construction entrance, and
other measures which may be used
© 2015 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
SEPA Checklist Page 6 of 25
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
City of Renton Washington
2. AIR
in accordance with requirements of
the City of Renton.
a. What types of em1ss1ons to the air
would result from the proposal during
construction, operation, and
maintenance when the project is
completed: If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if
known.
Short-term emissions will be those
associated with construction and site
development activities. These will
include dust and emissions from
construction equipment. Long-term
impacts will result from increased
vehicle traffic.
b. Are there any off-site sources of
emissions or odor that may affect your
Proposal? If so, generally describe.
Off-site sources of emissions or
odors are those that are typical of
residential neighborhoods. These
will include automobile emissions
from traffic on adjacent roadways
and fireplace emissions from nearby
homes.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control
emissions or other impacts to air, if any.
The Washington Clean Air Act
requires the use of all known,
available, and reasonable means of
controlling air pollution, including
dust. Construction impacts will not
be significant and could be
controlled by measures such as
washing truck wheels before exiting
the site and maintaining gravel
construction entrances. In addition,
dirt-driving surfaces will be watered
during extended dry periods to
control dust.
© 2015 D.R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
SEPA Checklist Page 7 of 25
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
City of Renton Washington
3. WATER
a. Surface water.
i. Is there any surface water body
on or in the immediate vicinity of
the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater,
lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes,
describe type and provide
names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
None to our knowledge.
ii. Will the project require any work
over, in, or adjacent to (within
200 feet) the described waters?
If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
Not to our knowledge.
iii. Estimate the amount of fill and
dredge material that would be
placed in or removed from sur-
face water or wetlands and
indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
None
iv. Will the proposal require surface
water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description,
purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
No, there will be no surface
water withdrawals or
diversions.
v. Does the Proposal lie within a
100-year floodplain? If so, note
location on the site plan.
Not to our knowledge.
© 2015 D. R. STRONG Consulting Engineers Inc.
SEPA Checklist Page 8 of 25
Alpine Nursery Preliminary Plat
City of Renton Washington