Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 01~ " "' ~ ~ PROPOSED STORM LINE ----- ..... ~. City of Renton Planning Division FEB 1 2 2013 ~~(C~~W~!Q> ~ N o· 100· · ....................... _ "",.,,,, ···--·---. -----....... __ ·-·---J ,oo· z a ~ ··-......_ ·-·--.. __ ~r ~ V) : Cl Z! ~, @! ! ·--------. --··--.... ------... ' ·-----.,,>'··,, '·,. ·-,,._\ ·------... , \ JI In!<~,',. \\ \ ~ I i [ , , '·. '-, \ \ .· ~ ---·--·-····-----,.··;··· ····; ,,' :[ :\ '·--.. :~---:, \-;-~ . C l1 ~,>, PROPOSED STORM LINE \ \ ffi ·v~ II \\ _,,/--,::_..:.__ I \ ; u. ,' ~ .--w \ --i - LEGEND EXISTING $TORM LINE ----@ EXISTING SEWER MAIN EXISTING WATER MA.IN RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED STORM LINE NOTES 1. NEW STORM LINE LOCATION APPROXIMATE. //_...--· // /,.. ,// // .>// w z ~ 11 l \~ NESlh~ ~ L . ,, .. :::::T-... _-;../0#/[M ........ --- a> IM1tl-::- I::._':';:. I =r~-1 A CITY OF ~ .:,~~'~ .. NE 5TH AND EDMONDS AVE NE STORM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT """" ..... ' PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Plat Name Reservation 4 Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND; Photosimulations 2 AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services PROJECT NAME: 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-He!p Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmlttalreqs.xls 06109 PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREME.NT-5 FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS· Legal Description 4 l\fapofl,Ex1si,r1g:~,te(fondlti0ns~·•,:,: Master Application Form 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services PROJECT NAME. 2. Public Works Plan Review 3. Building 4. Planning DATE: _;z/'73/30( 3 .... .,,!.__._./'+-~~-=-'-----~ H:\CEO\Data\Fonns-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\waiverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06/09 O' 600' N Seo.le• 1' = 600' NEIGHBORHOOOOil~li.f.lteMM NE 5TH ST I EDMONDS'IM/6i1~1i;livision STORM SYSTEM FEB 1 2 2u13 City of Renton Surface Water Utility D. Carey 2/6/13 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: September 13, 2013 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office - Project Name: 5th & Edmonds Storm System Improvement Project LUA (file) Number: LUA-13-000188, ECF Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Gerald Wasser Acceptance Date: March 21, 2013 Applicant: City of Renton Owner: Same as applicant Contact: Daniel Carey, City of Renton PIO Number: N/A ERC Approval Date: April 15, 2013 ERC Appeal Date: May 3, 2013 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: ' i Mylar Recording Number: -- I Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for a project which I would replace the existing storm system in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Avenue NE because it is old \ and under capacity. The project would reduce the potential for flooding in NE 5th Place and , Edmonds Avenue NE. I Location: ROW NE 7th St, NE 6th Pl, Camas Ave NE, Edmonds Ave NE, NE i1 " 5th Pl I Commooh, . STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on April 19, 2013. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $98.00. d~lls#/ ;f//Z-Z Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 19th day of April, 2013. ~ C 8;LfAPH?h-- Katfileen C. Sherman, Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Buckley, Washington , ':\''''\\\\\\\\lt1 ,,, -~"'G. SHl2f?11 _1,,,, ~~, , ... \\\\\\\111,,''7..d ,,, -°'.',L',· ....... , .... ,EX It 1A I -= ,J'-" ... ~'~o,... ll1L',.,,,-,,, ~ -""V -e;;~ ·~1,. ~ :·:-.../:0 '\;i..Rr-'d>~ -:.: 3 :C ff,¥ 0 i ~ ;::: J-: ;E~ ~ • ,. ~ z :: ::~~o ~ c, "0::; ~ ,:, '-EJ,.:.:: ~ ~O /:J 13V '-0 : 0 : ~ i u "-~_s.= 'Z "" 4-'\9' .$" ~.: 'I l/1 .... , ... X' -,,, u';-•• ,\\\\\\\\.''' ~<::> .;::- ,,,,,, -1 l"'f= OF \tJ ,,,,'-'" 1 1111\\\\\\\\'-''''' 1'0TICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRON:\IENTAL REVIEW cmtMITl"EE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determi- nation of Non-Significance (DNS) for the following project under the authority of the Renton municipal code. 5th & Edmonds Stonn System Improvement Project LUA13-000188 Location: ROW NE 7th St, NE 6th Pl, Camas Ave NE. Edmonds Ave NE, NE 5th Pl. Environmental (SEPA) Review in order to replace an existing stonn S\'stem located in the following streets: NE 5th St. Edmonds Ave NE. Camas Ave NE, and NE 6th St. The replacement project would increase the capacity of the stonn svstcm and would reduce the potential for Hooding in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Ave NE. Approximately 3,200 linear feet of existing stonn pipes would be replaced. Appeals of lhe D:\'S musl be filed in wriling on or before 5:00 p.m. on May 03, ·2013. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: I !earing Examiner c/o City Clerk. City of Renton. 1055 S Grady Way. Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more infonnation mav be obtained from the Renton· City Clerk's Office, 425-430-6510. Published in Renton Reporter on April 19, 2013. #769757. I CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the.17th day of April, 2013, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: . . .. Nanie Representing Agencies See Attached Daniel Carey, City of Renton Owner/ Applicant/Contact Sharon Barnes Party of Record Reynaldo Duazo Party of Record . /},,,.fl.. . "'''""'""''' (Signature of Sender): .•• -~ m '-.JU{./'t(,,Y' $~" ~l:i? 1111 11 -,=,, ~''"~''"•tt ,,, STATE OF WASHINGTON ) :: ~= ""'R~ .... \ ~ : ~~$ II "1i.".!.•,,, ~ =,= 0 \~~ )ss :;fa ... Jo~ ~ ,. "' C.t ,~:: COUNTY OF KING ) \ \" Pue~.._.., ~ E ~ ,.., ai<a'"f!f= ~I. d'~ lfti,hU\~'"''$ ~~ .: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker 11111 _.1'1: OF~~,..#" signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th1i!lu~~(\~Q.~poses mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Pubi· Tn;nd for the State of Washington Notary (Print) : ___ __:f.l.:....'--"'A_..,.{.,.'-'o-"ajp"""(.,_'/ ____________ _ My appointment expires: ,4"'5 v'3 \-ol q 1 ,:)0 t] Project Name: 5th & Edmonds Storm System Improvement Project Project Number: : LUA13-000188, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing .-. Dept. of Ecology • • Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region • Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers• Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers • Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETIER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher• 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office • 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Steve Roberge Director of Community Development 13020 Newcastle Way Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Liaison Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program • Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 17i'd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation• Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 *Note: Jf the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. **Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template -affidavit of seivice by mailing OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: 5th & Edmonds Storm System Replacement Project LUA13-000188, ECF ROW NE 7th St, NE 6th Pl, Camas Ave NE, Edmonds Ave NE,·NE 5th Pl DESCRIPTION: The appllcant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA} Review ln order to replace an existing storm system located in the following streets: NE 5th St, Edmonds Ave NE, Camas Ave NE, and NE 6th St. The replacement project would increase the capacity of the storm system and would reduce the potential for flooding in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Ave NE. Approximately 3,200 linear feet of existing storm pipes would be replaced. Addltionally, a 5-inch water main wlll be replaced during construction. Construction would primarily occur within the City's right-of-way adjacent to existing single-family neighborhoods. Approxlmately 3,500 cubic yards of soil would be hauled out to Install the new storm system. Backfill soil would be hauled in from llcensed gravel pits. All disturbed areas would be patched with new pavement. Adjacent land use consists of single-famlly residences within the Residential -8 du/ac (R-8) zone. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AOVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on May 3, 2013, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, Clty of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING Will BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION . PLEASE INCLUD_E THE.PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING·FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. Denis Law Mayor April 17, 2013 Department of Community and Economic Development C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 15, 2013: SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNSM) PROJECT NAME: 5th & Edmonds Storm System Improvement Project PROJECT NUMBER: LUA13-000188, ECF Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on May 3, 2013, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental R~view Committee, !;.~- Senior Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Renton City Hall o 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED {DNSM) MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA13-000188, ECF City of Renton 5th Place/Edmonds Storm System Replacement Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: he applicant is requesting Environmental ($EPA) Review in order to replace an existing storm system located in the following streets: NE 5th St, Edmonds Ave NE, Camas Ave NE, and NE 6th St. The replacement project would increase the capacity of the storm system and would reduce the potential for flooding in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Ave NE. PROJECT LOCATION: . LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: ROW NE 7th St, NE 6th Pl, Camas Ave NE, Edmonds Ave NE, NE 5th Pl The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. Work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be contacted at (360) 586-3065 should any archaeological artifacts be discovered during earthwork activities. ADIVISORY NOTES: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. 'RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. The applicant shall erect and maintain six foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (SO') indicating the words, "NO TRESPASSING -Protected Trees" or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (SO'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. Technical Services: 1. Ensure that the project has a monument preservation plan pursuant to RCW 58.09.130 and follows the requirements as defined in WAC 332-120. ERC Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 2 of 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: -MITIGATED (DNS-M) ' . LUA13-000188, ECF City of Renton 5th Place/Edmonds Storm System Replacement Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review in order to replace an existing storm system located in the following streets: NE 5th St, Edmonds Ave NE, Camas Ave NE, and NE 6th St. The replacement project would increase the capacity of the storm system and would reduce the potential for flooding in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Ave NE. PROJECT LOCATION: LEAD AGENCY: ROW NE 7th St, NE 6th Pl, Camas Ave NE, Edmonds Ave NE, NE 5th Pl City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-0?0D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on May 3, 2013. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: r , Administrator Department 'jt-'-__ _ Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Community Services Department April 19, 2013 April 15, 2013 0,s/13 Date Date Fire & Emergency Services C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Project Number: Project Manager: Owner: Applicant/Contact: Project Location: Project Summary: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: April 15, 2013 NE 5th Place/Edmonds Avenue NE Storm System Replacement Project LUA13-000188, ECF Rocale Timmons, Senior Planner City of Renton; 1055 South Grady Way; Renton, WA 98057 Daniel Carey; City of Renton Storm Water Utility; 1055 South Grady Way; Renton,WA 98057 ROW NE 7th St, NE 6th Pl, Camas Ave NE, Edmonds Ave NE, NE 5th Pl The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review in order to replace an existing storm system located in the following streets: NE 5th St, Edmonds Ave NE, Camas Ave NE, and NE 6th St. The replacement project would increase the capacity of the storm system and would reduce the potential for flooding in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Ave NE. Approximately 3,200 linear feet of existing · storm pipes would be replaced. Additionally, a 5-inch water main will be replaced during construction. Construction would primarily occur within the City's right-of-way adjacent to existing single-family neighborhoods. Approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil would be hauled out to install the new storm system. Backfill soil would be hauled in from licensed gravel pits. All disturbed areas would be patched with new pavement. Adjacent land use consists of single-family residences within the Residential -8 du/ac (R-8) zone. N/A Total Building Area GSF: N/A Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated {DNS-M). Project Location Map ERC Repor13-000188 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development NE 5TH PLACE/EDMONDS AVENUE NE STORM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT Report of April 15, 2013 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND Environmental Review Committee Report LUAl3-000188, ECF Page2of5 The project would involve the replacement ofthe existing storm system in the following streets: NE 5th St, between Edmonds Ave NE and Harrington Ave NE; Edmonds Ave NE, between NE 5th St and Camas Ave NE; Camas Ave NE, between Edmonds Ave NE and NE 6th St; NE 6th St, between Camas Ave NE and Aberdeen Ave NE; and Aberdeen Ave NE between NE 6th St and NE 7'h St. The existing storm water system is over 50 years old and is currently under capacity. Local flooding has occurred in the area during periods of intense rainfall. The project would reduce the potential for flooding in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Ave NE. Approximately 3,200 linear feet of existing storm system would be replaced. The existing 15-inch and 18- inch diameter storm water pipes would be replaced with new 18-inch to 30-inch diameter pipes capable of conveying storm water flow. In addition to new storm water pipe, new manholes and catch basins would be installed as part of the replacement project. The proposal would occur within the City's right-of-way. Most of the construction activities would be located within asphalt covered streets and in some areas the construction activities would be located in lawn also located within the City right-of-way. The new storm system would be placed in a trench approximately 5-feet wide and 6 to 8 feet in depth. It is estimated that approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil would be excavated to install the new storm system. Backfill soil would be hauled in from licensed gravel pits. All disturbed asphalt areas would be patched with new asphalt. Any front yards which are disturbed during construction would be restored to existing condition upon project completion. The project is expected to commence in June 2013 and be completed in December of 2013. Construction activities would take place during the hours of 7:00 am and 5:00 pm Monday through Friday. During construction affected streets would be restricted to "Local Access Only" and on-street parking would be restricted. The project contractor would use the parking strip to store construction equipment and material. Access to local driveways would be maintained except at such times the construction blocks crosses driveways. The project contractor will be responsible for ensuring that a traffic control plan is in place during construction to ensure access for residents and emergency vehicles. There are no critical areas located on site and the site is not located within an Aquifer Protection Area. I PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. ERC Repor13-000188 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Environmental Review Committee Report NE 5TH PLACE/EDMONDS AVENUE NE STORM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT LUA13-0001BB, f Report of April 15, 2013 Page 3 of 5 B. Mitigation Measures 1. Work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be contacted at (360) 586-3065 should any archaeological artifacts be discovered during earthwork activities. C. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Zoning Map Site Plan Aerial Photo Geotechnical Report prepared by Kleinfelder Inc., dated October 13, 1997 D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The existing storm system is located in residential streets which are surfaced with asphalt concrete pavement. About 1,800 square feet of right-of-way in NE 61 h Place is shown as regulated slopes between 15 and 20%. The site mainly consists of steeper front yards and driveways next to the street. Construction is not expected to impact slopes within the construction area. The applicant provided a Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Kleinfelder, dated October 13, 1997 (Exhibit 4). The soils in the area are classified as Ragnar (RdC). The soil is typically dark grayish brown, dark yellowish brown, and fine sandy loam. As the project consists of storm water pipes, catch basins, and manholes which would be located within public rights-of-way, no significant impacts are anticipated. Approximately 3,500 cubic yards of backfill material could be used. Bedding gravel will be used around the new storm water pipe and the City's contractor would provide needed backfill material from commercial suppliers. Backfill material would be placed. to the top of the construction fence and graded to match existing ground contours. Because all construction would take place within public rights-of-way, erosion potential is minimal. Standard erosion control for utility excavation would be employed including filter fabric fences, covering soil stockpiles, mulch, and catch basin inlet protection. No change in impervious surface coverage would result from completion of this project. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Nexus: Not applicable. 2. Air Impacts: During construction activities dust and engine emissions will be created as a result of digging by construction equipment. Standard emission control devices would be utilized by construction equipment. A water truck would be used to minimize dust during construction activities if needed. ERC Repor13-000188 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development NE 5TH PLAtf/EDMONDS AVENUE NE STORM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT Report of April 15, 2013 Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Nexus: Not applicable. 3. Noise Environmental Review Committee Report LUA13-000188, ECF Page 4 of 5 Impacts: It is anticipated that short-term noise would occur during regular construction. Construction times for this project will be restricted to the hours between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 am and 8:00 pm and no work shall be permitted on Sundays. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Nexus: Not applicable. 4. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: While the site has previously been disturbed by development, there remains a potential for subsurface archaeological deposits. The excavation trench would be limited to approximately 5 feet in width and 6 to 8 feet in depth. Staff recommends that work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be contacted at (360} 586-3065 should any archaeological artifacts be discovered during earthwork activities. Mitigation Measures: Work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be contacted at (360} 586-3065 should any archaeological artifacts be discovered during earthwork activities. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 5. Transportation Impacts: Approximately 175 truck roundtrips could result from the hauling of the approximately 3,500 cubic yards of grading material out and into the site. No road closures are anticipated. If necessary, a flagger would be present to ensure traffic flow. The project contractor would maintain a traffic control plan which would ensure resident and emergency vehicle access during construction activities. Access to driveways would be maintained except when construction needs to cross or block a driveway. The project contractor would be required to limit driveway blocking to one day or less and would be required to provide a minimum of 24 hour notice prior to working in driveway areas. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Nexus: Not applicable. E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or" Advisory Notes to Applicant." ./ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. The Environmental Determination decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). ERC Repor13-000188 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development NE 5TH PLACE/EDMONDS AVENUE NE STORM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT Report of April 15, 2013 Environmental Review Committee Report LUA13-000188, ECF Page 5 of 5 Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, on or before 5:00 p.m. on May 3, 2013. RMC 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7'h Floor, (425) 430-6510. ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes ore provided vs infarmotion only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. . 4. The applicant shall erect and maintain six foot (6') high chain link temporary construction fencing around the drip lines of all retained trees, or along the perimeter of a stand of retained trees. Placards shall be placed on fencing every fifty feet (SO') indicating the words, "NO TRESPASSING -Protected Trees" or on each side of the fencing if less than fifty feet (50'). Site access to individually protected trees or groups of trees shall be fenced and signed. Individual trees shall be fenced on four (4) sides. In addition, the applicant shall provide supervision whenever equipment or trucks are moving near trees. Technical Services: 1. Ensure that the project has a monument preservation plan pursuant to RCW 58.09.130 and follows the requirements as defined in WAC 332-120. ERC Repor13-000188 M --.... ~ fa;l Ill ~ z .., M ~ QC = ""' fa;l UC-NZ 1- ..... , . ,,',',,, IH EXHIBIT 1 l.UNINl:i MAP BOOK PW TECHNICAL SERVICES PRINTED ON 11/13/09 ""''""'"""''"·"""''""''"""'"'"""' ....-.,,.....,."''"'""'''"'"""''"" :::,:::.=::i~'~:.:~':,:-.::;; ,, D4 -05 T23N RSE E 1/2 R-8 NE12'hSI ' l<IE \W,Bt f[l!liir!rJil ' ' I ' ! i I I l f J •• RM-F F4 -17 T23N RSE E 1/2 & 0 200 400 I l I I Feet 1:4,800 E4 08 T23N RSE E 1/2 5308 RESIDENTIAL 0 (RC) Resource Conservation ~ (R-1) Residential 1 du/ac g (R-4) Resldentlal 4 du/ac ~ (R-8) Residential 8 du/ac ~ (RMH) Resldentlal Manufactured Homes ~ (R-10) Resldentlal 10 du/ac j R-14 j (R-14) Residential 14 du/ac l RM-Fj (RM-F) Residentlal Multl-Famlty IRM-r f (RM-T) Residential Multi-Family Traditional jRM-u) (RM-U) Residential Multi-Family Urban Center MIXED USE CENTERS ~ (CV) center VIiiage luc-N1I (UC-Nl) Urban Center-North 1 ~ (UC-N2) Urban Center -North 2 [§] (CD} Center Downtown COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL [2J {IL) Industrial -Light CE] (IM) Industrial -Medium ~ {IH) Industrial-Heavy -----Renton City Limits ~ (CCR) Commercial/Office/Residential -·--Adjacent City Limits [§] (CA) Commerclal Arterial @] (CO) Commercial Office l(ROLL PAGE 0 (CN) Commercial Neighborhood PAGE# INDEX 5£CT/TOWN/RANGE ~ ~ ~ "' '' -/ I I I I ·r . / mUl/l , ' NE 71h St ---, -~--:cg.1. .. ~ _ __j -_g 3 Ji( ·!r- 1 -... ::r~.E.. tu,-...----,...., PROPOSED STORM LINE ' PROPOSED STORM LINE IEXIHIIIBXT 2 ·--..• ____ ·-.. ·--- -·· -..... ····--.._ NE: )'tlli 8t ··-·--. ·-... __ .. j ·-.. ..__ ··-... ] wJ zl ~i ~ 1' i1 I I ____ _ ·--... .._ ..... __ ·,. City of Renton Planning Division FEB 1 2 2013 [R1~~~~1W~[Q) o· 100· LEGEND 200' -so -EXlSTlNG STORM UNE ----@ EXlSTlNG SE'M:.R MAIN EXISTING WATER MAIN RIGHT..Of'•WAY PROPOSED STORM LINE NOTES ~ N a 1.NEW STORM LINE LOCATION APPflOXIMATE. ·--"-,., "'..,_ '·,,,\~-./<:// !l! ··,,. ______ ··, .. , __ _ •. \ \ ____ :. w ,,/ // . z / '. w / \-;; / \ I \w \ u. ~ I I \ .... NE5Ui!:_L ~ 1~r~·- I~~-1----1-=~00-1 ~ CITY OF I NE 5TH AND EDMONDS AVE NE STORM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 1 • 1~,1-3-I l:-':..~ ! @ ""'~"'9,,_.,.~~T~ o.p,. SEPA SrTE PLAN !c'I 605 0 302 605 NAD _ 1983 _Hf'.RN_ StatePJane _ Washington_ North_FIPS_ 4601 Feet l~A 1J Jc([)([)01188 IEXIHliBlCl" 3 Information Technology -GIS RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.gov 04/09/2013 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate. current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Legend None 0 1:7,259 OtyofR.etf(Ofl~ Finance & IT Division Ik,."f{J KLEINFELDER REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION NE S'" STREET AND EDMONDS A VENUE NE STORM SYSTEM Il.\'IPROVEMENT PROJECT RENTON, WASHINGTON Kleinfelder, Inc. 3380 146th Place SE, Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98007 (425) 562-4200 (425) 562-4201 (fax) October 13, 1997 !EXHIBIT 4 ., ..... _ '-"tty Of c.L, p , ,:-c,-•. -lan-1· ··-'•«11·1 • .i tn 0 '!· . · ., t-1v,sion F[B -1 2 iUJJ NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A M•rt•r Appllcatlon hm b .. n fll1d ind 1,;c1pt11d with thl D11J11rtment of CommUftlty & Econamlc DnelD11menl jCED)-Plannlna DIYl•lon ofthl City of Renton. n,., followl"I brlelly d11crlbH lh11pplh:•tlon,n11 th• n, .. ssary Public ApprtN1b. DATE Of NOTICE OF ""PLICATION: March 21, 2013 lANO USE NUMIER1 LUA13·000188, ECf PROJECT NAME: s"' & Edmond1 Storm SYJ1em lmprowm1nt Prc,Jeet PROJECTDUCfllPTION: The appllunt b ..-questln& ErMIOnmen~I (Sl'PA} Rr.rlow for I project which would ropl1ee the u\Jt1n11torm 1vnem In NE 5th Place incl Edmond, Avonut NE because It Is okj and u,,du CIP"'tltv. The projea would~-Ille pot1nll1I for lloocUnc In NE 5th Plae,, 111d Edmond!; A .. nue NE, Durtn1 construction the ul,tlrc wat.r main In NE 5th Plata will btt replacKI with I new 8-lrlch ~ttt m1ln, blstlnc 15 and 1!-h'lch diameter norm ... 1er plp,,1 would be replaeed w~h new 18 to 30-loch dl1meter pipes capable of canylni the dnlan llorm WIier flow. Appr,,.lm1toly 3,200 rlflur Ifft of ~"C 1\orrn pipe• from NE 7th 5trffl thru111h NE 5th Pia"' would be replac1d. eon,tructlon would be prlmarlly In Hph1!t cow,r1d 1t,oets within City rlaht-of...,...y, In 10m, "'""' tho nl1t1n1 rtom, systtm b k>Clled In front y1nls which aro In tM City ri,ht-of-w1y. Then~ 11crrn 1y1tem would be placed In I trench 1ppro,l,n.a!1ly S fut wide ind 6 to 8 fe'1 deep. Appru,:lm1tely 3,500 cubic y1nl1 of son may be t.<avlttd to !nstlll tke new ston,, system. B1ckflll ooll would be h1uled In from llctnsed l"vel pl!$. All disturbed ortH WflUld be patch1d wtth MW nphilll Con,stru,;tion of the new llorrn systtm would start In NE 7th Street Ind protffd 10 the · southeHt In NE 6th Pl1ce, Clmu Aven!>I' NE, Edmonds Aw,m1e NE, and NE 5th Place. Construction of the new B·lnch water main In NE 5th I'll« would be betwttn Edmondi Averwe NE ind INlex Aven!>I' NE. PROJEatoCATION: ROW NE 7th SI. NE 6th Pl, Comas Ave NE, Edmcnd1Ave NE, NE 5th Pl OPTIONAL DmRMINATlON OF NON•SIGNIFlet.NCE, MITIGATED (DN5-M): Al the lead A(tocy, th1 City of Rontcn hn determined that 1!anlflant envtronrnental lmpa,;ts are unlikely to rfllllt from tt.. proposed project. Therefore, n permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton Is 111ln1 tt.e Optlon1I ONS-,M procH1 to 1~• notite th1t I DNS- M Is llbly tc be ~. Comment periods Im the project ind the proposed DNS-M are Integrated Into 1 1lng0! commeM pa~od. Thoro will bl nc comment parlol! following the Issuance <rf ""' Thntshold Det1rrnlnltlon of Hon- Slgnllklru-Mllialled (IJN$-M). A 14-diy 1ppe1l perlod wm IDllowtht lnu1= oftht ONS·M. PERMIT APPLICATION IJAU, NOTICE OF COMPLETE Al'PUCATION: APPUCANT/P'IIOJECT CONTACT ptlUON: P1rml11/R1vlew A1q111111d: Other P•rmtli which may bl requlrd: Aniuffll'd swcttu: Febru•rv 12, 2013 March 21,2013 Danl,rl Orrq, OtyolA1nton; 1055 S G .. ,:ty Way, lllfflon, WA tl0S7; Eml: dc,,ray1P,.ntonwa,1<>v EmMonmant1l (SEPA) Ravl1w If you would ltke tc be m1de I party of ,ecord to n,~lw, furthef lnfcrrnatlon on this prop0sed projec:t, complete 1h11 form and n,tumtc: City ol Aento,i. CEO -Plannl"C ONIJ!on, 105550. Gr1dy W,y, Rlll!on, WA 9IIOS7. N1me/FUe No~ 5th & Edmondl Storm svnem lmpruvement ProJetl/LUA13-<lll01H, ECF NAME:--------~-------------------- MAILlNGADDRESS: _____________ Clty/Stlto/Zl!r:_: _______ _ TELEPHONE HO~------------ Lt>utlon ..._. appJlatlo bl rovl1w.d, PUIUC HEAIIING: CONSISTENC'I' OVERVIEW: Zonlnl/Llnd U11: Envlronmont1I Dot11m1nt1 that Evai...t. the Propowd l'rcject: Dewlopmont Re1ula1lon1 U1N For Pro/1ct Mltl11tlon: ll1par1ment ol Cctmnunlty I, fconomk Dn1lopm1n1 {CED)-Plan nine DMJlon, 5hcth Floor Ranton City Hall, 1055 SDUth Gr1dyW1y, Renton, WA 111157 .,. Thi Jub;tct ,1te lsdesl1n1ted A-a on the City of Renton Ccmprehen1fve Land Use M1p1nd R11ldentt1I S1n1l1 F1ml!y on the Ot(1Zcning Mip, Envlrunmental (5.EPA) Cl>tcklbt The project win be Jubject to the Cl!y'15EPA cnllnanc,, RMC4-9-0?0 and other 1ppllt:able ccdHand reaulatlon,u 1pproprla11. Comm1nt1 on the 1bov1 1ppllatlon must bl 1ubmltt1d In wrltlna: to Gerald wa ... ,, Allotlote Plinn,r, cro _ PlaMlnl D1vi1lon, 1055 South Grady Way, R1nton, WA 98057, lry J:00 PM on Ap,lt 4, 1011. If 'fOU ,.. .. questions tbovt this propoHI, crwllh lo be m1dt I party of record 1r,d rocelve 1dditlon1I nollflcatlon by mall, contact the Project M1na1er. Anyone who 1ubrnlts Wntlen com,,..nu win •uto,n.allcally bfocomt • pony of n,cof11 tfld wl~ be notlfltd of 1ny decision an 1h11 project. CONTACT PERSON: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382; Eml: gwasser@rentonwa.gov CERTIFICATION ereby certify that --==:;...,4 - ...... <-,-conspicuous places or nearby the Signed: ss COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~ ~az rd COo <5«- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/t eir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Hd r Notary Public~d for the State of Washington Notary (Print): _ __,H-'---"A"-'.'--...1.h.,_.,.-,..ra""b""<(,..(:'-------- My appointment expires:_~,,;c:tbu-auµ'.!.;' S'i:c:L--...e;;Lq-4-1 ..Ld.?JQj;..,4,1,1.. ____ _ • • .. CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 21st day of March, 2013, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Environmental Checklist, Notice of Application, Reduced Site Plan documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached '';'""'"'"'""'"' .~7n~ ~ ~ ~-~ ,,,~ ) SS f llo1Alti,. \ \ STATE OF WASHINGTON ff~·~ ~t... t4. 1 COUNTY OF KING ) I l -·-~ !l i I ~ t "u&" ~ :st . . . I~~~ I I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker ~l "I~''"-,iF signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary acC,t.::ir"!:~l!>l~urposes ,11,,,,,,,, ....... ,,,, ... mentioned in the instrument. •"" Dated: fJ1Jar1cJ., Cl/ 3 013 I Notary Pu~d for the State of Washington Notary (Print): ___ ___.H-'-'-. cA,_,. __ fccu.cJ.!,rJ:,a,,.if"------------- My appointment expires: A-~ "'-S'f ol q 1 &00 Project Name: 5th & Edmonds Storm System Improvement Project Project Number: LUA13-000188, ECF template ~ affidavit of service by mailing a V Dept. of Ecology ** Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region • Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers • Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Attn: SEPA Coordinator 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Larry Fisher• 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Ouwamish Tribal Office• 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 s. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. • Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172"' Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program* Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Steve Roberge · Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 Newcastle Way 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liaison Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6200 Southcenter Blvd. PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-OlW Tukwila, WA 98188 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 *Note: Jf the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. "'*Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov template ~ affidavit of service by mailing .. CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING . On the 22nd day of March, 2013, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing 300' Surrounding Property Owners See attached /;I A A -A (Signature of Sender): "''""'\\'"''' ~: ~-';;t; /-7 ..._,,..._. -n A~ ,,,, V ---.;,7 V V ,. $'. '~,,,l STATE OF WASHIN~TON f ,l;-l,;~~~~ \ :: W .. 01Atf_.,·~ ~ ) 55 :1 o ~ -• ~ COUNTY OF KING ) \ \ ;II~"~ J.e 1 ~~ ... ~8-2~ ~§ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Gerald C. Wasser \,,1'f~"n1"'"" 9:,"#,.f signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act 11tir,10f ~fs~ purposes 'Ii\\\\"'"' mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 172Md z 2 .2 DI 3 I tt~ Pu~nd for the State of Washington Notary (Print): ___ _Jf-l~Ao....:-c.....1.G..ir.-"a.bss,Jc.<r _____________ _ My appointment expires: A "\'.i =+ ol~, aoG Project Name·: 5th & Edmonds Storm System Improvement Project Project Number: LUAB-000188, ECF • ' ' KERKES JAMES A+PENELOPE A R PO BOX 3174 MANHATIAN BEACH, CA 90266 JONES BRANDON C+KATHERINE A 474 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 PETETI RONALD D JR 509 HARRINGTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 BLACK KARYL J 513 HARRINGTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 SANDERS KELLY E+MICHAEL B 514 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 BALES J L 2721 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98055 GIBSON JOHN 2412 277TH AVE SE SAMMAMISH, WA 98075 WIXOM ROBERT J 532 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 TRUJILLO ALAN 2604 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 TRUMFIO STEVE+KIM 578 WINDSOR PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 HERRERA JOSE JESUS+SILVIA 504 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 WINKLER JANE 8837 129TH PL SE NEWCASTLE, WA 98056 REYNOLDS IV CHARLES LEE+ANN 508 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 TRAN HOA 2634 NE 5TH CT RENTON, WA 98056 TONDA LILA JEAN 528 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 LEVKIV SOLOMIYA ET AL 2613 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 TEEL ROBERT 2525 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 SWANBERG REVOCABLE LIVING T 2612 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 NOON PAT O+SUSAN J 14209 SE 144TH ST RENTON, WA 98059 HANSON CHRISTOPHER 582 WINDSOR PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 MAXWELL KATHERINE L 2709 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 HENG SAMKHANN Y . 522 EDMONDS CT NE RENTON, WA 98056 KELLEY JEANETIE B 512 HARRINGTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 BROWNLOW HEATHER 1204 N 10TH PL #2345 RENTON, WA 98057 DINH TUNG DONG+HONG THANH P 516 HARRINGTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 MERFALEN GALE BARON 1706 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 TRO VAN DO+TON LUU THI 4009 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 GRIFFIN JON F+YOLANDA M 2809 204TH AVE SE SAMMAMISH, WA 98075 STEWART DANIEL R 576 HARRINGTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 GUTIERREZ MARIO 578 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 BUI KIM-ANH+ TAN 642 BLAINE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 LUO BIAO+YAN HONG DONG 659 BLAINE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 BLUFTON MELODY A 659 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 OCHOA KEVIN F 671 BLAINE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 HALPAUS JOHN R JR 3260 ANAHIEM DR WASILLA, AK 99654 HANSFORD JULIE A 2107 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 CANUL NELSON M+YAEGGY LESBIA 707 ABERDEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 CONUS ADAM D+CONUS JENNIFER L 2109 NE 8TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 TAYLOR JOSEPH D 815 ABERDEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 KWAN CHRISTOPHER FU-JONG+WA 11805 SE 219TH PL KENT, WA 98031 VINTAGE WORLD PROPERTIES LL 10161 BOLSA AVE #204-C WESTMINISTER, CA 92683 VUONG BINH & HA TAT 14349 SE 92ND ST NEWCASTLE, WA 98059 GLEASON FRANCIS M JR 662 BLAINE NE RENTON, WA 98056 SOKOLSKY LEONID+STASYA 666 SUNSET BLVD NE RENTON, WA 98056 PETERSON DAVID S+LUETIA M 679 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 JIMENEZ JUAN A+PEREZ MARIA 5154 NE 20TH ST RENTON, WA 98059 KALASOUNTAS GEORGE P 9563 MALB!S LN DAPHNE, AL 36526 MA LEON & MA CRYSTAL 4122 100TH AVE SE MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 HALFACRE PAUL D 2106 NE 8TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 DUAZO REYNALDO D PO BOX 3493 RENTON, WA 98056 RATTY SHAM S+JASBEER K 654 BLAINE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 AITONEAN IOAN+MARIA 663 BLAINE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 EVANS FRANK 667 BLAINE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 HINTZ CHRISTOPHER L+MICHELE 671 CAMAS AVE NE 'RENTON, WA 98056 TORRES MIGUEL+HEATHER 2101 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 DRIVER TONI M 2128 NE 7TH ST SEATILE, WA 98056 MENDOZA JUAN RENE 850 RUSSELL AVE #H12 SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 BLANSFIELD STEPHEN M 711 ABERDEEN AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 GALT CHERYL 12628 SE 169TH PL RENTON, WA 98058 KIMSEY TYLER M 550 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 PIECZATKOWSKI ERIK S 2716 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 CASTRO JOSE LUIS 631 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 HERMAN SHARON A 711 JONES AVES RENTON, WA 98055 KALASOUNTAS HELEN 1407 172ND PL NE BELLEVUE, WA 98008 CHIARAPPA JONATHAN M+MARLAE 686 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 GILLESPIE ALEXANDER+MINDY 2315 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 MOORE JOSHUA B 2033 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 SCHWARTZENBERGER GREGORY W 2706 NE 5TH CT RENTON, WA 98055 DELVILLAR FELIX C 554 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 OGILVIE KIMBERLEE FUGERE JEREMY 2600 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 HARRISON SHELLEY 2612 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 TOZER CARINA L 632 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 TOWNSEND ROBERT G 654 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 DAYTON8 LLC 554 ROSARIO AVE SE RENTON, WA 98059 PETERSEN JUDITH K 2201 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98055 PHILLIPS JEFFRY J 1140 EDMONDS AVE NE #216 RENTON, WA 98056 JOSEPH EZRA 6016 S ROXBURY SEATILE, WA 98118 SUTHERLAND JEFF+MCBURNEY ME 510 WINDSOR PL NE RENTON, WA 98025 SOTO SERGIO+MARIA E GONZALEZ 2701 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 HEATHERINGTON EVELYNN 605 EDMONDS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98055 JOLLY DANIEL A+DANIELLE M 2505 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 RAGLAND JEAN 616 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 RYAN INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 17426 W LAKE DESIRE DR SE RENTON, WA 98058 KNOWLTON DALEE & SUSAN L 2311 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 RAMSEY DAYLITE C 2319 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 JUST NOW LLC 12916 85TH AVE NE KIRKLAND, WA 98034 CHARLEY BRIAN 26204 189TH PL SE COVINGTON, WA 98042 YAMAMOTO ASHLEE R 554 WINDSOR PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 WOOLSTON CHARLES E+ THERESA 2608 NE 6TH PL . RENTON, WA 98056 MATCHED DAVID W+BRENDA L 605 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 SUROWIECKI JENNIFER HELEN 609 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 BEREITER SPENCER T 636 BLAINE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 NGO TAY+THUY TRANG NGUYEN+V 608 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 OLIVER RANDY M 654 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE A PO BOX 650043 DALLAS, TX 75265 MANIKHAM ACKSONE MEO 2207 NE 6TH CIR RENTON, WA 98055 LUU MICHAEL VAN+SIU KIMBERL 2107 NE 6TH CIR RENTON, WA 98056 BEKKEVOLD ELIZABETH J 17121 TABOR AVE SW VASHON, WA 98070 ZHU ANGELA 2208 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 COFFEY STEPHEN J EVERED MARIANNE E 2203 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98076 EVENHUS J B 2514 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 ABRAHAM SENAIT +HABTE YONAS 614 BRONSON PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 CHANDLER RALPH A+CAROL A 651 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 NAVARRETE JACINTO P+MARISA 663 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 FELTMAN BRUCE H 666 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 INTHAVONG KEN K+JUNE 2203 NE 6TH CIR RENTON, WA 98056 DAOUD SAMIR M 2318 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 WATIS STEVEN P 2220 NE 6TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 COHEN TOBY 805 NW 51ST ST SEATILE, WA 98107 CRAIG MATIHEW A 2029 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 BAINBRIDGE HOLDINGS LLC 21620 SE 28TH ST SAMMAMISH, WA 98075 GOULD BETTY 635 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 JANNUSCH GARY C+DENISE E 615 BRONSON PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 NICOARA ALEXANDRU I+MINODORA M 2200 NE 10TH PL #1 RENTON, WA 98056 WALKER STEVEN J 679 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 LE HA 2115 NE 6TH CIR RENTON, WA 98056 CHEN QI TING 2308 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 SVARZ MATI 2212 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 BRIERE WILLIAM S+MELISSA L 2223 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 DENIS MITCHELL M+ERIN J 2308 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 ALANIZ-ROMERO AMAURY 2218 NE 7TH ST RENTONST, WA 98056 LARKIN BRADFORD W+NICOLE M 714 SUNSET BLVD NE RENTON, WA 98056 ALVAREZ VICTOR+MIA SCIGLIAN 508 WINDSOR PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 LAURENC!O DANNY G+NEN!TA 574 WINDSOR PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 BLANCHETT PHILIP 607 BRONSON PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 AYALA AGILEO+ARISMENDI JOSE 674 SHELTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 PELAYO LUIS CARLOS+MARCELA 671 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 STEWART HUGH J+CHERYL ANN 8024 255TH AVE NE REDMOND, WA 98053 GRAY SUSAN C 2312 N E 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98055 MORTENSEN DAVID W 2204 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 PREPOTENTE ARTURO O JR+LEILANIE L 2106 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 RAM ARUNA/VIJAY 2609 NE 5TH CT RENTON, WA 98056 KEARNEY DOUGLAS A 2712 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 BEDFORD GARTH B 601 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98055 KOTLAN KYLE 625 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 BRIGHT F 650 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98055 ROSS THOMAS M+R!TA I 670 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98055 LOVERIDGE PAUL D 19538 SE 51ST ST ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 BASSIG JOSE A 2103 NE 6TH CIRC RENTON, WA 98056 SEAMSTER GEORGE A JR 2200 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98055 VALENCIA ROSA 2209 NE 8TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 THANT SAMUEL+LENORA X WANG 2628 NE 5TH CT RENTON, WA 98056 KEELER SCOTT+RACHEL 2609 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 TIMO PAUL V 613 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 FLOREZ JAIME 639 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 RYNES DAVID JOHN+MARY ELLEN 8541 31ST AVE NW SEATTLE, WA 98117 UNG KENG K CHANG LY HOUN 4512 NE 7TH PL RENTON, WA 98059 CAINE BRIAN 2213 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 THORNTON DOUGLAS J+PAULE J 672 SUNSET BLVD NE RENTON, WA 98056 MONSON PAUL K+MAUREEN L 2104 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 TRUONG VINCENT THE+DENISE L 6930 115TH PL SE NEWCASTLE, WA 98056 MARTINEZ ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ LETICIA 2102 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 YEE STUART M+MONICA Y 2816 NE 5TH CT RENTON, WA 98056 AFANASJEV SERGE 2708 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 MEJIA DANELIA MOLJNA+VIANA 603 HARRINGTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 TORRES REBECA 300 VERMONT PL NE #A102 RENTON, WA 98056 BARNES SHARON A 2227 SOUTH 284TH PL FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 WALSH ROBERT D 17018 137TH PL SE RENTON, WA 98058 MIRAMONTEZ MERRILY J 650 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 PACECCA ROCCO 3870 80TH SE MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 KRAMER SHARON E 2210 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 HESTJNG ROBERT W 812 SUNSET BLVD NE RENTON, WA 98055 BRUCE FREHIWOT M 520 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 SAECHAO MUANG WEUN 3220 S DAWSON ST SEATTLE, WA 98118 STAUCH JACOB L+EILEEN R 604 BRONSON PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 BRIGHT DARRYL 621 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 HYNES CHERYL A 643 FERNDALE AVE NE . RENTON, WA 98056 MONSERUD JACK+MARILYN 13808 NE 12TH ST #203 BELLEVUE, WA 98005 PACECCA ROCCO 3870 80TH AVE SE MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 TRIMBLE LINDA 658 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 PATERNOSTER ERIK D+MARCIE B 2205 NE 8TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 MACDONALD JESSI M PO BOX 1021 RENTON, WA 98057 HIMMELMAN TYLER K 558 WINDSOR PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 FORBES EDWARD DARRELL 2605 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 DANG KIM 600 BRONSON PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 HOGAN PAUL 600 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 HENRIQUEZ MARIA 647 FERNDALE AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 LUTA JOSIF+MARIA E 1806 JONES AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 NICOARA JOAN ALEXANDRU+MINO 662 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 STARRETT MICHAEL W 2125 NE 6THCIR RENTON, WA 98056 . ' OLINICK VITALY 2319 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 ANCARNACJON PAEZ 2221 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98055 SANTOS TOMAS DELOS+DINA M M 2304 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 DAVIS TERRI L 2303 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 HILL CLARENCE E 7817 S 134TH ST SEATILE, WA 98178 GROTH DEREK D 516 EDMONDS CT NE RENTON, WA 98056 FREDERICKS MARK L+KIMBERLY 5432 111TH PL SW MUKILTEO, WA 98275 WHITEHEAD LUKAS C 2510 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 LUCE MICHAEL C+CEDRA DUFLON 250 WEST LAKE SAMMAMISH PKWY BELLEVUE, WA 98008 THAVONGSACK MANIVANH 2211 NE 6TH CIR RENTON, WA 98056 SUNSET HEIGHTS HOA 2119 NE 6TH CIR RENTON, WA 98056 OLIVA HECTOR A+AMBROCIO BLANCA s 2205 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 PEEK LARRY D+LUCILLE R 2113 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 HASHIMOTO STEVEN I 2219 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 BENSON ARTHUR W+LISA M LENT 2302 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 PHUNG KIEN C & NGO LOAN 5138 NE 8TH PL RENTON, WA 98059 THOMPSON WARREN I & REBECCA 577 HARRINGTON NE RENTON, WA 98055 MITCHELL AMIE L 2502 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 PEREZ MARICELA 659 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 LE NHAN B+NGOAN THI TRAN 2209 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98052 HERNANDEZ SAMUELS 2111 NE 6TH CIR RENTON, WA 98056 DENNIS DAVID K DENNIS SHARON A 14227 SE 162ND PL RENTON, WA 98058 KNOX JAMES C+CHERYL A 2311 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT GROUP 1400 S JACKSON ST SUITE 6 SEATILE, WA 98144 ANDERSON MARY J 2214 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 ZARATE FELIPE 569 HARRINGTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 FLORES MARIA L 610 BRONSON PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 LESINSKI MICHAEL 2506 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 SIMPSON KEVIN M+KIM L 670 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 CORREA KENT & CYNDE 670 SUNSET BLVD NE RENTON, WA 98056 . ' MARTINEZ ROSALBA 2216 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 NGUYEN HUNG THANH 2206 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 BLINSTRUB MARK B 2217 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 SAMP MAX P+MARIANNE 562 WINDSOR PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 TIMMERMAN GREGORY E 2514 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 COLLOD! FLORIO & PATRICIA A 3709 JONES AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 BISHOP AUTRY B 8223 S 122ND ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 GEPFORD ROBERT LOREN 2613 NE 26TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 ASKEW ELIZABETH 612 CAMAS AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 ENGELAND DA 691 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98055 WILLECKE WADE ELLIS+BARBARA 2109 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 MARTIN ERIC 2202 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 SHARPE CHRISTOPHER D 570 WINDSOR PL NE RENTON, WA 98056 ADAMS CLINT J 566 WINDSOR AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 HOLLIDAY BRUCE D 2508 NE 5TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 MEDGARD VERNON H+MARSHA 21304 SE 213TH ST MAPLE VALLEY, WA 98038 COCHRAN RYAN NICHOLAS+KELLY 2601 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 TROMBLEY LISETTE M 2616 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 5000 PLANO PKWY CARROLLTON, TX 75010 LE LONG MINH+JANELLE T +KIM NGOC T 10444 RAINIER AVES SEATTLE, WA 98178 KESSACK JAMES A JR 2215 NE 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 FORGAARD WENDELL L 678 SUNSET BLVD NE RENTON, WA 98056 YOST AILEEN M 515 JASON AVE N KENT, WA 98030 THIRION MAMIE 409 JEFFERSON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 HABER DOROTHY F C/0 PRETS CAROL 16123 SE 145TH PL RENTON, WA 98059 LUCAS ELIZABETH A 2513 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 GUTIERREZ FRANCISCO J 2523 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 KARINEN KENNETH 2705 NE 6TH PL RENTON, WA 98056 BURTON RENEE+GIGLIOTTI TRAV 687 DAYTON AVE NE RENTON, WA 98056 SKYWIRE PROPERTIES LLC 227 BELLEVUE WAY NE 227 BELLEVUE WAY NE PMS 154 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Plannlng Divlsion of the City of Renton. The following brlefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: March 21, 2013 LUA13-000188, ECF 51n & Edmonds Storm System Improvement Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for a project which would replace the existing storm system in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Avenue NE because it is old and under capacity. The project would reduce the potential for flooding in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Avenue NE. During construction the existing water main in NE 5th Place will be replaced with a new 8-inch water main. Existing 15 and 18-inch diameter storm water pipes would be replaced with new 18 to 30-inch diameter pipes capable of carrying the design storm water flow. Approximately 3,200 linear feet of existing storm pipes from NE 7th Street through NE 5th Place would be replaced. Construction would be primarily in asphalt covered streets within City right-of-way. In some areas the existing storm system is located in front yards which are in the City right-of-way. The new storm system would be placed in a trench approximately 5 feet wide and 6 to 8 feet deep. Approximately 3,SOO cubic yards of soil may be excavated to install the new storm system. Backfill soil would be hauled in from licensed gravel pits. ·Alt disturbed areas would be patched with new asphalt. Construction of the new storm system would start in NE 7th Street and proceed to the southeast in NE 6th Place, Camas Avenue NE, Edmonds Avenue NE, and NE 5th Place. Construction of the new 8-inch water main in NE 5th Place would be between Edmonds Avenue NE and Index Avenue NE. PROJECT LOCATION: ROW NE 7th St, NE 6th Pl, Camas Ave NE, Ed~onds Ave NE, NE 5th Pl OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS:M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: February 12, 2013 March 21, 2013 Daniel Carey, City of Renton; 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057; Eml: dcarey@rentonwa.gov Environmental (SEPA} Review None Geotechnica1 Report If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED-Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: 5th & Edmonds Storm System Improvement Project/LUAB-000188, ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip: __________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: --------------- Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulatlons Used For Project Mitigation: Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9BOS7 N/A The subject site is designated R-8 on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential Slngle Family on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-9-070 and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner, CED - Planning Division, 105S South Grady Way, Renton, WA 980S7, by 5:00 PM on April 4, 2013. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7382; Eml: gwasser@rentonwa.gov PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Denis Law ;.'-pri~f /l -~M=ayoc--~~~' Jf~®frillt,(Q)J]l March 21, 2013 Daniel Carey City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Dep'.artment of Community and Economic Development C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application 5th & Edmonds Storm System Improvement Project, LUAB-000188, ECF Dear Mr. Carey: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 15, 2013. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions. Renton City Hall o 1055 South Grady Way o Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov City of Renton City of Renton Planning Division LAND USE PERMIT FEB I 2 LtllJ MASTER APPLICATION~~, 'fe[r\'\ , . ····"''··•"' PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: City Of Renton PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NE 5th Place/ Edmonds Ave NE ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way Storm System Replacement Project PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: Renton, WA ZIP:City 98057 City ROW in the following streets NE 7th St (2100, 700 blocks) NE 6th Place (2100-2200 blocks) TELEPHONE NUMBER: Camas Ave. NE (600 block Edmonds Ave. NE (500 block)) NE 5th Place (2500-2700 blocks) 98056 APPLICANT (if other than owner) KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): NAME: City of Renton Surface Water Utility City ROW Attn: Daniel Carey COMPANY (if applicable): City of Renton EXISTING LAND USE(S): SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way PROPOSED LAND USE(S): NO CHANGE CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98057 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-430-7293 Residential Single Family dcarey@ci.renton.wa.us PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CONTACT PERSON (if applicable): NA NAME: Same as Applicant EXISTING ZONING: R-8 COMPANY (if applicable): PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NA SITE AREA (in square feet): appx. 19,200 sf ADDRESS: ( appx. 3200 LF x 6 ft wide trench patch) ) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: NA CITY: ZIP: SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: NA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NA H:\File Sys\SWP -Sutface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE Sth-Edmonds\1300SEPA-2013\20130208 Master Appl v04.doc 02108113 -- P JJECT INFORMA TION (cont Jed) NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): None PROJECT VALUE: $1,200,000 (approx.) IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): None ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): D AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE NA 0 AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO Yes SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): None D FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL D GEOLOGIC HAZARD Reg. Slope aeex 1,800 sq. ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA D HABITAT CONSERVATION SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): None D SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 WETLANDS BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): NA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION i. TOWNSHIP 23N , RANGE SE W.M. , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ H:\File Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE Sth-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130208 MasterAppl v04.doc 02108113 sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. - . ROJECT INFORMATION (contin ... _J) AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP fh, C,+, •f Ru,+•n s .. rfu, w .. t,, U..f-;1;11 I, (Print Name/s) Daniel Carey . declar hat I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or x the authorized representative to act for · and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the b t of my knowledge a belief. D (Signature of Owner/Representative) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -,'-i,:'-'.;>:""'-':'-..,...,_>:-=-':":';""-::-"""\ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. \ ,, . \c:,, -\ c~ My appointment expires:_-'--'--.)=--'--_ _J_.__~ __ ..::::,-'- H:\File Sys\SWP. Surface Water Projects\SWP·27. Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27·2306 NE 5th·&lmonds\130? SEPA-2013\20130208 MasterAppl v04.doc 02108113 PROJECT NARRATIVE NE 5th PLACE/ EDMONDS AVE NE STORM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT The project involves replacing the existing storm system from NE 7th Street through NE 5th Place since it is over 50 years old and under capacity. The project will reduce the potential for flooding in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Ave NE. Local flooding has occurred in that area during periods of intense rainfall, most notably during the December 1996 flood event. The existing 15-and 18-inch diameter stormwater pipes will be replaced with new 18- to 30-inch diameter pipes capable of conveying the design stormwater flow. Approximately 3,200 linear feet of existing storm system from NE 7th St through NE 5th Pl will be replaced. The exact pipe sizes and location will be determined in the final design. New manholes and catch basins will be placed at various locations in the streets. Construction will primarily be in asphalt covered streets in the City right-of-way. In some areas the existing stormwater system is located in front yards that are in the City right-of-way. The new storm system will be placed in· a trench approximately 5 feet wide and 6-to 8-feet deep. Approximatley 3,500 cubic yards of soil may be excavated · to install the new storm system. Backfill soil will be hauled in from licensed gravel pits. All distrubed asphalt areas will be patched with new asphalt. Any front yards that are disturbed will be restored back to existing conditions when the project is completed. Construction will start in NE 7th .St and will proceed to the southeast in NE 6th PL, Camas Ave NE, Edmonds Ave NE and NE 5th PL. During construction streets will be restricted to "Local Access Only" and on street parking will be restricted. The contactor will use the parking strip to store construction · material and equipment. Access to local 'driveways will be maintained, except when construction needs to cross or block a driveway. After construction is completed all streets will be restored to existing access and parking. City of R P!ann; · E>nto,, ng Divis/on FEB 1 2 Z01J /?Jtrt;tu~t© H:\File Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE Sth-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212c Project Narra-Mitigate v02.DDC CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION NE 5th PLACE/ EDMONDS AVE. NE STORM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT Proposed Construction Dates: Approximately June 2013 through December 2013. Hours of Operation: Monday through Friday between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM Proposed Hauling/Transportation Routes: The contractor will probably use Sunset Blvd. NE, NE 7th Street, Edmonds Ave NE, and , . NE 3rd Street to reach the construction area. Truck hauling on arterial streets will be limited to the hours of 8:30 AM to 3:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Work on weekends will only occur with approval from the City. The contractor will be required to file a Traffic Control Plan with the City to identify hauling routes and traffic control measures for the construction area. Erosion control measures such as storm drain inlet protection per the King County Surface Water Manual will be used. Any soil stockpiles not in use will be covered with plastic sheets during rainy periods. Stockpiles and the working area may be watered to reduce dust generation, if needed. All construction equipment will be required to have muffler and exhaust systems in good working order. City of Renton Planning Division FEB I 2 2013 H:\File Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE Sth-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130208c Project Narra-Mitigate v02.DOC 'v PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS,l __ zn l.'::========================:!~~~~ton City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 Planning Division FEB I 2 2013 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: . /Ri [f cc; [f D\\f ~ IQ) The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this · checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. -1 -06/09 H:\File Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE Sth-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc · A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: NE 5th Place/Edmonds Ave NE Storm System Replacement Project 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton, Surface Water Utility, Daniel Carey, P.E., Civil Engineer 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. City of Renton Surface Water Utility Attn: Daniel Carey 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 425-430-7293 Date checklist prepared: February 2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start Construction June 2013 Complete Construction December 2013 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geotechnical Report 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known · 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Environmental Review -2 - H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE 5th-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist l/03.doc 06/09 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The project involves replacing the existing storm system from NE 7th Street through NE 5th Place since it is over 50 years old and under capacity. The project will reduce the potential for flooding in NE 5th Place and Edmonds Ave NE. local flooding has occurred in that area during periods of intense rainfall, most notably during the December 1996 flood event. The existing 15-and 18-inch diameter storm water pipes will be replaced with new 18-to 30-inch diameter pipes capable of conveying the design storm water flow. Approximately 3,200 linear feet of existing storm system from NE 7th St through NE 5th Pl will be replaced. The exact pipe sizes and location will be determined in the final design. New manholes and catch basins will be placed at various locations in the streets. Construction will primarily be in asphalt covered streets in the City right-of-way. In some areas the existing storm water system is located in front yards that are in the City right-of-way. The new storm system will be placed in a trench approximately 5 feet wide and 6-to 8-feet deep. Approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil may be excavated to install the new storm system. Backfill soil will be hauled in from licensed gravel pits. All disturbed asphalt areas will be patched with new asphalt. Any front yards that are disturbed will be restored back to existing conditions when the project is completed. Construction will start in NE 7th St and will proceed to the southeast in NE 6th Pl, Camas Ave NE, Edmonds Ave NE and NE 5th PL During construction parking on each block will be restricted, and the block will be limited to local access only. The contactor will use the parking strip to store construction material and equipment. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The west end of the project is located at the intersection of NE 7th Street and NE 6th Place. The project will run from NE 7th St to the southeast in NE 6th Pl, Camas Ave NE, Edmonds Ave NE, and NE 5th Pl to the intersection with Harrington Ave NE. The project site is primarily in the SE 1/4 of Section 8; Township 23 N, Range 5 E, W.M. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other X Asphalt streets, flat to rolling topography • 3 • H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE 5th-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc 06/09 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Approximately 11 percent on NE 6th Place. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soils in the area are classified by the Soil Conservation Service, King County Soil Survey, as Ragnar (RdC). The soil is typically dark grayish brown, dark · yellowish-brown, fine sandy loam. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The new storm system will be placed in a trench approximately 5-feet wide and 6-to 8-feet deep. Bedding Gravel will be used around the new storm water pipe and Imported Backfill or Bank Run Gravel will be used for backfill above the pipe. All backfill material will be obtained from a local gravel pit. Approximately 3,500 cubic yards of backfill material could be used. The ground surface will be restored to the existing grade after construction is finished. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. The project will consist of trenching in the asphalt covered streets so erosion is not likely to occur. Typical erosion control measures identified in 1. h. (below) will be used to mitigate potential impacts. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? About 95 percent of the site area consists of existing asphalt streets and 5 percent consist of grassed right-of way. Trenches in the streets will be restored with asphalt pavement. Any landscaped areas that are disturbed will be replanted and restored. Construction will not change the amount of impervious surface in the area. -4-06/09 H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27-Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE 5th-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checkllst v03.doc h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR Typical erosion control measures such as storm grate inlet protection and covering any exposed soil sto·ckpiles, as specified in the King County Surface Water Design Manual, will be used. a. What types of emis.sions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction exhaust from construction equipment and dust from the trench excavation and backfilling will occur. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Construction equipment will have mufflers and exhaust systems in good operating condition. Stockpiles and working area may be watered to reduce dust generation, if needed. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NA. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. -5 -06/09 H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE Sth-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None is expected. If ground water is encountered during excavation the contractor will dewater the excavation as needed and will pump the water to the nearest storm manhole, provided that the groundwater is not turbid. If needed, a temporary sediment trap, tank, or filter fabric barrier will be used to filter any muddy water before discharge. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. Storm water runoff to the project comes from the residential areas around the project site, and from the Renton Technical College Campus at the east end of the drainage basin. Storm water runoff is collected by catch basins in the streets and is conveyed to the west by the existing 15-and 18-inch storm water pipes. The drainage area consists of about 100 acres. The estimated peak flows at the downstream end of the drainage basin at the intersection of NE 7th St and NE 6th Pl ranges from 30 to 40 CFS for the 25-year, 24-hour storm event. From the NE 7th St/NE 6th Pl intersection storm water runoff flows to the west to a drainage system under 1-405, then to the north approximately 0.8 miles to discharge into Lake Washington. The project will not change the amount of storm water collected or the discharge location. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The use of typical erosion control measures per the 2009 KCSWDM during construction will be used to prevent soil and sediment from entering the storm water system. -6 -06/09 H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE 5th-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc ' d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The project will not change the amount of storm water collected. The project will increase the capacity of the storm water drainage system, and reduce the potential for flooding in Edmonds Ave NE and NE 5th PL. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ X_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ X_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Various trees next to the street in the right-of-way _x_ shrubs Misc. shrubs next to the street in the right-of-way ....lL grass Misc. grass next to the street in the right-of-way __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass and small shrubs along the street may be removed, if needed for construction. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: After construction any areas where grass or shrubs were removed will be replanted with the same type of vegetation. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other --------- misc. common small birds . Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other ---------- misc. small mammals such as mice, squirrels, dogs. cats. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other------- b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. -7 -06109 H:\File Sys\SWP • Surlace Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE 5th-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed or needed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None needed for completed project. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: · Not Applicable. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. During construction fuel or oil spills could occur. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Typical emergency services by the Fire Department in case of fire, injury, or fuel spills. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Contractor will keep construction equipment in good operating condition. Contractor will cleanup any oil or fuel leaks and spills, and will repair equipment responsible. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. -8 - H:\File Sys\SWP. Surface Water Projects\SWP-27. Surface Water Projects {CIP)\27-2306 NE Sth-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc 06/09 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term: Noise from construction equipment may occur between the hours of 7 AM to S PM, Monday through Friday. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction equipment will have mufflers and exhaust systems in good operating condition. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The project site consists of an asphalt streets, concrete sidewalks, or grass strips in the right of way. The adjacent properties are single family residences. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? City right-of-way Surrounding area is Residential Single Family (RS). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? City right-of-way g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. About 1800 square feet of right-of-way in NE 6th Place is shown as Regulated Slopes between 1S% and 25%. The area mainly consists of steeper front yards and driveways next to the street. Construction in the asphalt street is not expected to affect the slopes. -9- H:\File Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (ClP)\27-2306 NE 5th-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc 06/09 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not Applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure· the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not Applicable. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not Applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Not Applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not Applicable. • 10 • 06109 H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27-Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE Sth-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not Applicable. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not Applicable. · 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not Applicable. -11 - H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE 5th-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc 06/09 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by NE 7th St, NE 6th Pl, Camas Ave NE, Edmonds Ave NE, and NE 5th PL The contractor will probably use Sunset Blvd NE and NE 7th Street to reach the west side of the site, and may use NE 3rd Street and Jefferson Ave NE to reach the east side of the site. During construction streets will be restricted to "Local Access Only" and on street parking will be restricted. The contactor will use the parking strip to store construction material and equipment. Access to local driveways will be maintained, except when construction needs to cross or block a driveway. After construction is completed all streets will be restored to existing access and parking. · b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Portions of Edmonds Ave NE are served by public transit c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? During construction on street parking will be restricted and the contactor will use the parking strip to store construction material and equipment. On street parking will be restored after construction. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? The public streets will be patched with new asphalt after construction. No changes to the size or location of the streets are anticipated. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The contractor will file a Traffic Control Plan with the City to identify hauling routes and traffic control measures for the construction area. Access to local driveways will be maintained, except when construction needs to cross or block a driveway. The contractor will be required to limit blocking driveways -12-06/09 H:\File Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2306 NE Sth-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc ) to one day or less, and will be required to provide a minimum of 24-hour notice prior working in driveway areas. There are no long-term transportation impacts from the project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. By reducing the potential for flooding, responses by City forces to flooding problems will decrease. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No Applicable. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. The construction area has electricity, natural gas, water, refuse services, telephone, sanitary sewer, and storm water utilities at or near it. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The existing storm water system will be replaced with a new storm water system. See the project proposal description in section A. 11. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature: _..,,_D;c._...c,.,..;.,f __ · --'--01'-'-· :....P."'------- 0 a .. i e I Carey Name (Print): Date: 2 -/2 -/ j -13 -06/09 H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects {CIP)\27-2306 NE 5th-Edmonds\1300 SEPA-2013\20130212b SEPA Checklist v03.doc Ill KLEINFELDER REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION NE S'h STREET AND EDMONDS A VENUE NE STORM SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RENTON, WASHINGTON Kleinfelder, Inc. 3380 146th Place SE, Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98007 ( 425) 562-4200 ( 425) 562-420 I (fax) October 13, 1997 )111 KLEINFELDER REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION NE 5th STREET AND EDMONDS A VENUE NE STORM SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RENTON, WASHINGTON Kleinfelder, Inc. 33 80 146th Place SE, Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98007 (425) 562-4200 (425) 562-4201 (fax) October 13, 1997 KLEINFELDER An Pmp/U)'!!I! 01\'llt'd (._U/lt/1.l/J)' October 9. l 997 Kleinfelder File No.: 60-1674-0l City of Renton Planning/ Building/ Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South, Surface Water Utility Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: SUBJECT: Mr. Ronald J. Straka, PE Utility Engineering Supervisor Report of Geotechnical Investigation NE 5th Street and Edmonds Avenue NE Storm System Improvement Project Renton, Washington Dear Ron: The attached report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the NE 5th Street and Edmonds Avenue NE storm system improvement project planned by the City of Renton. This investigation was performed in accordance with Consultant Contract Agreement CAG-97-107 dated June 19, l 997. We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical services to the City of Renton on this project. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding this report or if we can provide assistance with other aspects of the project. Sincerely, KLEINFELDER, INC. ((M~t m, mrAJl~ Robert M. McIntosh, PE Project Geotechnical Engineer \~13~ Yames B. Thompson, PE Principal Geotechnical Engineer I EXPiRES Note: The material contained in this report was prepared under the direct supervision of the undersigned, whose seal as a registered professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of Washington is affixed to this page. Enclosures: Report (2 copies) \1Jdi_sea\voll\Jibrnry\1997\wpdraft\6017rll95.doc Date Printed: 10/10/97 Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. KLE!NfELDER 3380 14fith Pl;Ke SE, Suile 110, 1:3ellcvuc, WA 98007-6•172 (206) 562-4200 (206) 562-4201 fax • ·, • RI KLEINFELDER TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION A_ND SCOPE ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Description ........................................................................................................... I I. 2 Purpose and Scope ........................................................................................................... I 2.0 FIELD EXPLORATIONS .................................................................................................. 2 3.0 LABORATORY TESTING ................................................................................................ 2 4.0 DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................... 3 4. l Geologic Hazards ............................................................................................................ 3 4.2 Site Conditions......................................... .. ................................. 4 4.3 Subsurface Conditions ................................ , .................................................................... 4 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................ : .................................................................................... 4 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................... 5 6. 1 Construction Considerations ........................................................................................... 5 6. 1.1 Dewatering. ............................ .. ....................................... 5 6. 1.2 Excavations............................................................. . ................................. 6 6. 1.3 Open-Cut Slopes..................................................... .. ................................. 6 6. 1.4 Temporary Excavation Support ................................................................................. 6 6. 1.5 Backfill .................................................................................................................... 7 6.2 Design Considerations ..................................................................................................... 8 6.2. 1 Pipe and Manhole Support ... .... .... ...... ............ .... ...... ... . .. ...................................... 8 6.2.2 Hydrostatic Uplift ................................................................................................... 9 6.2.3 Pavement Sections ... .. . ... . . . . . . . . ... .. . . .. .. . . .... . . ..... .... ... . . . .................................. 9 7.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ......................................... .-...................................................... 9 7.1 Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation ......................................................................... 9 7.2 Project Bid Documents .................................................................................................... 9 7.3 Construction Observation and Testing .................................... : ........................................ I 0 8.0 LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................ , .................... 10 APPENDICES A Plates B Application for Authorization to Use \\Jd i _ sea\vol l \library\ 1997\wpdraft\60 I 7r09 S, doc Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Dato Printed: 10/10/97 REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION NE 5TH STREET AND EDMONDS AVENUE NE STORM SYSTEM ™PROVEMENT PROJECT RENTON, WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE 1.1 Project Description 1111 KLEINFELDER This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the NE 5th Street and Edmonds Avenue NE storm system improvements planned by the City of Renton. The general location of the site is shown on the Site Vicinity Map, Plate I. The project consists of improving the existing storm system in the following city streets: Northeast 5th Street between Edmonds Avenue Northeast and Harrington Avenue Northeast; Edmonds Avenue Northeast between Northeast 5th Street and Camas Avenue Northeast; Camas Avenue Northeast between Edmonds Avenue Northeast and Northeast 6th Street; Northeast 6th Street between Camas Avenue Northeast and Aberdeen Avenue Northeast; and Aberdeen Avenue Northeast between Northeast 6th Street and Northeast 7th Street (the northern terminus of the project). The southern terminus of the project will be at the intersection of Northeast 5th Street and Harrington Avenue Northeast. Conventional pipeline trench construction is planned for the storm system improvements. The depth of the trench is expected to range from about 5 to 15 feet below existing grades. New manholes will be installed as part of the storm system improvements. 1.2 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study is to explore the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions along the alignment of the proposed storm system improvement project, and to develop geotechnical recommendations and criteria for project planning and design. Our specific scope of services includes an evaluation of the following: o Geologic setting, seismicity and geologic hazards; o Soil and ground water conditions along the alignment, with emphasis on how these conditions are expected to affect the proposed construction; o Recommendations for earthwork during construction including site preparation recommendations, a discussion of the re-use of excavated soils as structural fill, and a discussion of the effects of wet weather on construction activities; o Recommendations for subgrade support of new stormsewer pipe and manhole structures; o Design parameters for manhole structures to resist the effects of hydrostatic uplift pressures, where appropriate; \\lcli _ scn\vol 1 \librmry\l 997\wpdrnft\60 I 7r09.S.doc Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc, Page I ofll Dntc Printed: 10/10/97 l!!lfi KLEINFELDER o Recommendations for cut slopes in trenches and temporary shoring requirements; • Potential effects of new construction on existing facilities; • Recommendations for temporary construction dewatering including conceptual dewatering techniques, where appropriate; • Recommendations for trench cutoffs to control the flow of groundwater in trench backfill and pipe bedding; o Recommendations for pavement sections which will be used for reconstruction of the disturbed portions of the roadway. 2.0 FIELD EXPLORATIONS Subsurface conditions along the project alignment were explored by drilling 6 test borings at the locations shown on Plate 2. The exploration locations were located in the field by measuring from existing site features. The subsurface explorations were monitored by a geologist from our firm V.:ho maintained detailed logs of the explorations and obtained representative samples of the soils encountered for further examination in our laboratory. The soils encountered were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System as described in Plate 3. A key to the boring log symbols is presented in Plate 4. Representative samples of the soils encountered were obtained from the borings using an SPT (Standard Penetration Test) sampler .. The SPT sampler obtains disturbed samples and was driven into the soil using a 140-pound hammer free-falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the last 12 inches, or other indicated distance, are recorded on the boring logs. Piezometers were installed in the borings to permit future monitoring of groundwater levels. The logs of the test borings are presented on Plates 5 through 10. 3.0 LABORATORY TESTING All soil samples were brought to our laboratory for further examin~tion. Moisture content tests were performed on selected samples in conjunction with the other laboratory tests. The results of moisture content tests are presented in the boring logs. Sieve analyses were completed on 4 selected soil samples, the results of which are presented in Plates 11 through 14. The results of another sieve test completed on a composite sample are presented in Plate 15. The composite sample was created by combining several samples of granular soils that will be excavated during construction and possibly re-used for structural fill. A summary of the sieve test results is presented in Table I. A compaction test was completed in accordance with ASTM D-1557 using the composite soil sample. The compaction test results are presented in Plate 16. \\kli _ sca\vol l \Jibrary\ 1997\wpdraft\60 l 7r09 5.doc Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page2of11 Dale Printed: 10/10/97 m KLEINFELDER TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF STEVE ANALYSES Percent · Depth Percent Percent Fine to Medium Percent uses Samole (feet) Gravel Coarse Sand Sand Silt and Clay Classification B-1, S-1 3 31.0 6.1 57.5 4.5 SP B-2, S-1 3 .5.4 4.4 87.3 2.9 SP B-3, S-2 8 0.8 3.7 91.9 4.4 SP B-5, S-1 3 18.9 4A 47.5 29.2 SM COMPOSITE NA 18.9 5.1 57.5 18.5 SM 4.0 DISCUSSION 4.1 Geologic Hazards Slope Stability and Landslide Hazards Slopes which are steeper than 40 percent are typically considered to be potential slope stability and landslide hazard areas. We did not observe any slopes which are steeper than 40 percent along the project alignment. Therefore, it is our opinion that slope stability and landslide hazards are not a concern for the existing site slopes under both static and seismic conditions. The stability of temporary excavation slopes are discussed below under Construction Considerations. Seismic Hazards Seismic hazards relate to risks of injury to people and damage to property resulting from earthquakes. Seismic hazards include surface fault rupture, ground shaking, associated landslides, and liquefaction. The Puget Sound area is a seismically active region which has experienced numerous earthquakes in historical time. On the basis of past earthquake activity, the Uniform Building Code assigns the Puget Sound region a Zone 3 rating for seismic activity on a scale of l (lowest) to 4 (highest). Given the thickness of glacial and post-glacial soil deposits in the region, surface fault ruptures are very rare. No known surface fault ruptures are present in the site vicinity. - As described in the previous section, it is our opinion that landslide hazards are not a significant concern for the existing site slopes. Liquefaction is the phenomenon wherein soil strength is dramatically reduced when subjected to vibration or shaking. Liquefaction generally occurs in saturated, loose sand deposits. The results of our test borings indicate that liquefaction is not a significant concern the storm system alignment. \IJdi _ sea\vol L \library\ 1997\Vr'pdrnft\60 I 7r09 5 .doc Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. PageJofll Dale Printed: IO/I0/97 HI KLEINFELDER 4.2 Site Conditions The existing storm system is located in residential streets which are surfaced with asphalt concrete pavement. There is an elevation difference of approximately 75 feet between the southeast and northern ends of the alignment. A number of existing buried utilities are present in the vicinity of the proposed storm system improvements. 4.3 Subsurface Conditions The following paragraphs summarize the results of our subsurface explorations. The logs of the test borings should be reviewed for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions encountered at the locations explored. All of the test borings were drilled in existing pavement areas. The asphalt concrete pavement encountered in the borings, with the exception of Boring B-5, was observed to be approximately 3 inches thick. At Boring B-5, the asphalt concrete was measured to be approximately 12 inches thick, with a I inch thick layer of ciushed rock in the middle of the pavement section. Except for Boring B-4. approximately l-l/2 to 5 feet of very loose to medium dense sand, silty sand and sandy gravel fill was encountered in the test borings. Below the fill. and beneath the asphalt concrete in Boring B-4. the test borings encountered native soil deposits consisting of medium dense to very dense sand and gravel with varying silt content and very stiff to hard silt and sandy silt. These native soils contain varying amounts of cobbles. The depth to groundwater was measured in the borings during drilling and on September 3, 1997. The depth to groundwater was measured to range from 5.2 to 24.5 feet in the borings on September 3, 1997. No groundwater was measured in Boring B-l on that date. It is important to note that site groundwater levels may vary significantly with seasonal variations in rainfall duration and intensity. It should be expected that these groundwater levels may be slightly higher than those measured in this investigation, particularly during the late winter and early spring months. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on our geologic reconnaissance, field explorations and analyses, we conclude that the proposed improvements to the existing storm system can be completed using conventional cut and cover construction methods. At some locations, the space available for trenching operations may be limited. Ground loss should be avoided in order to protect the existing roadway, structures and utilities, and to protect personnel. The existing roadway, along with structures and utilities which are located in close proximity to the storm sewer alignment, may present space limitations for deep open-cut excavations. Consequently, we expect that the storm system trench will require temporary support in areas of deeper cuts, high ground water levels, and where it will be close to other structures and utilities. \\kli _sea\vol l \Jibrary\ l 997\wpdro.fi\60 l 7r09 .5 .doc Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder. lnc. Pagl!4ot'll Dnte Printed: 10/ I 0/97 ffl KLEINFELDER In our opinion, the subsurface soils encountered during our field exploration program will provide adequate support for properly bedded pipe. However, where soft and loose subgrade soils are encountered, additional excavation will be needed to provide suitable support for the pipe and manhole structures. Some of the on-site soils contain a substantial amount of silt and will be susceptible to disturbance if they become wet. Care should be taken to avoid disturbing these soils where they support pipes or other related structures (e.g., manholes). Removal and replacement of the upper portions of subgrade soils might be necessary should they become disturbed. Excavation dewatering will likely be necessary along portions of the storm sewer alignment. We anticipate that some combination of pumping from sumps in the trenches, wells or well points will be used to control groundwater seepage during construction. Manholes constructed in areas of high groundwater levels should be designed to resist uplift pressures due to groundwater. Specific recommendations for project design and construction including mitigation of potential problems described above are presented in Section 6.0. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Construction Considerations 6.1.1 Dewatering We understand that the stormwater pipe will likely be installed to a depth of 5 to 15 feet below existing grades. Groundwater levels were observed to be within 15 feet of existing grades during and/or after drilling in all of our explorations except for Boring B-3. Groundwater levels were observed to be about 5 to 8 feet below the existing grades at Borings B-4 and B-5 on September 3, 1997. As mentioned previously, the groundwater levels at the site may experience seasonal variations. It should be expected that groundwater levels may be higher than those measured in this investigation, particularly during the winter and early spring months. Because of the proximity of groundwater to the expected pipe invert elevations, we recommend that the contract documents include a provision which states that the contractor shall dewater all excavations in a manner which will maintain the groundwater level at a minimum depth of 2 feet below the bottom of the excavation while work is being performed in the bottom of the excavation. Possible dewatering measures include the use of ditches and sumps within the excavation, well points and/or wells. In our opinion, the contractor should be responsible for designing and installing the appropriate dewatering system needed to complete the work. This dewatering system should include provisions for disposal of the collected water. We recommend that the contractor be required to submit the proposed dewatering plan to the engineer for review prior to start ·of construction. \IJdi_sen\vol L \Jibrary\1997\wptlrn.ft\6017r095.doc Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Pnge S t1t'I I DlltC Printed: 10/10/97 ffl KLEINFELDER 6.1. 2 R'l:cavations All excavations and other construction act1v1t1es should be completed in accordance with applicable city, state and federal safety standards. We anticipate that all on-site soils can be excavated using conventional earth moving equipment. Cobbles were observed in some. of our test borings. Boulders are often found in these soils as well. The contractor should be prepared to deal with these conditions. 6.1.3 Open-Cut Slopes We anticipate that some of the excavations will made as open cuts. The stability of open-cut slopes is a function of soil type, groundwater levels, slope inclination and nearby surface loads. The use of inadequately designed open-cuts could impact the stability of adjacent roadways, nearby structures and existing utilities, and endanger personnel. In our opinion, the contractor will be in the best position to observe subsurface conditions continuously throughout the construction process and to respond to variable soil and groundwater conditions. We therefore believe that the contractor should have the primary responsibility for deciding whether or not to use an open-cut slope rather than some form of temporary excavation support. For preliminary planning purposes only, we expect that temporary cut slopes of 1/2: I to I: I (horizontal to vertical) may be used for excavations up to 4 feet deep. Cut slopes of I: I to 2: I will likely be required for deeper, unshared, excavations. The above guidelines assume that surface loads, such as equipment loads and storage loads, will be kept a sufficient distance away from the top of the cut so that the stability of the excavation is not affected. The guidelines also assume that the excavations will be dewatered in such a way that significant seepage is not present on the slope face. Flatter slopes and/or excavation support · will be necessary for those portions of the excavations which are subjected to significant seepage in order to maintain the stability of the cut. It should be expected that the excavation face will experience some sloughing and raveling. Berms should be installed around the perimeter of the excavation to intercept surface runoff and reduce the potential for sloughing and erosion of the cut slope. 6.1.4 Temporary Excavation Support We recommend that a trench shoring system be used where excavations will be located in close proximity to roadways, utilities or structures where these excavations might result in ground loss and damage to these facilities. A trench box is one type of support system which might be used. The zone behind the trench box and the excavation face should be backfilled as necessary to limit ground movement. Alternatively. braced or unbraced shoring of various types could be considered. \\lcli sea\vol 1 \librn,y\1991\wpdrnf\\60 I 7r09S.doc Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Pag~6ol'II Dt1lc Printed: I 0/10/97 ffl KLEINFELDER The lateral soil pressures acting on a temporary excavation support system will depend on the ground surface configuration adjacent to the trench, and the amount of lateral movement which can occur as the excavation is made. For support systems that are free to yield at the top at least one-thousandth of the height of the excavation, soil pressures will be less than if movement is limited by such factors as wall stiffness or bracing. We recommend that yielding systems be designed using an equivalent fluid density of 35 pounds per cubic foot (pct) for horizontal ground surfaces. This is based on a water level at or below the bottom of the excavation. For nonyielding systems, we recommend that the shoring be designed for a uniform lateral pressure of 25H in pounds per square foot (psf), where H is the depth of the planned excavation in feet below a level ground surface. The above recommended lateral soil pressures do not include the effects of surcharges ( e.g., equipment loads, storage loads, traffic loads, or other surface loading). Surcharge effects should be considered as appropriate. Existing structures may be sensitive to vibrations. If shoring is driven or vibrated as part of this project, the effect on nearby facilities should be adequately evaluated. We recommend that the contractor submit their shoring plan to the engineer for review prior to the start of construction. 6.J,5 Backfill We recommend that materials and procedures used for bedding and backfill of the proposed storm sewer improvements be in accordance with applicable provisions of the City of Renton specifications. Backfill material should be placed in 6-inch lifts and mechanically compacted to a firm, nonyielding condition. Within pavement areas, trench backfill in the upper 2 feet below the finished subgrade surface should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557. Other backfill material placed within pavement areas should be compacted to at least 90 percent of ASTM D-1557. We recommend that trench cutoffs be installed, where appropriate, to control the flow of groundwater in trench backfill and pipe bedding. The trench cutoffs should extend from the base of the trench to at least 12 inches above the top of the pipe. We recommend that the cutoffs consist of compacted impervious soil or concrete. The cutoffs ;houlr.j be at least 3 feet in length. Most of the soils encountered in the borings consist of sand or gravel with a fines content (percent of soil by dry weight that passes through the U.S. Standard No.200 sieve) ranging from about 3 to 20 percent. These soils are shown on the boring logs as having USCS soil classification Symbols of SP, SP-SM, GP and GP-GM. We anticipate that the in-situ moisture contents of these soils are generally at or near optimum where they are located above the groundwater table. These soils should be suitable for use as backfill provided that moisture contents are not allowed to increase during construction. Some of this material would be difficult, or impossible, to use as trench backfill during wet weather due to a high fines content. \\kli_ scn\vol I \Jibrary\I 9971wpdraft\6017r095.doc Cop)Tight 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Pag~7ofll Dall: Printed: 10/10/97 Ill! KLEINFELDER Deposits of fine-grained silt and silty sand (USCS Group Symbols ML and SM, respectively) were encountered in some of the borings. These materials will be unsuitable for use as backfill due to a high fines content. Sands and gravels excavated from below the ground water table will also not be suitable for use as backfill due to moisture contents being wetter than the optimum moisture contents for compaction. These unsuitable materials should be segregated from the other excavated soils and replaced with imported backfill. An allowance for the use of imported backfill should be included in the project budget. For placement during periods of wet weather, imported backfill material should consist of sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (material passing US Standard No. 200 sieve) by weight of the fraction of the soil passing the 3/4-inch sieve. A fines content of up to IO to 12 percent will be acceptable for the imported fill for placement during periods of dry weather. We recommend that the placement and compaction of trench backfill be observed by a representative of our firm. An adequate number of in-place density tests should be performed in the backfill as it is being placed to determine if the specified compaction is being achieved. 6.2 Design Considerations 6.2.1 Pipe and Manlwle Support We anticipate that the storm system improvements will be constructed using conventional pipe trenching techniques. We anticipate that the subgrade soils at pipe and manhole inverts will generally be suitable for support of these facilities. However the subgrade soils may be susceptible to disturbance as a result of construction activities. To address this concern, we recommend that a zone of select material be placed on the base of the excavations for manholes, and other critical structures, to provide a stable "working pad" for these structures. Further, we recommend that all slough and disturbed subgrade soils be removed from the base of the manhole excavations before placing the "working pad" and that the manhole excavations be made with a smooth-bucket backhoe (e.g .. without teeth) to facilitate the removal of slough. We recommend that the "working pad" material consist of 3-to 6-inch sized quarry spalls or recycled concrete, or an equivalent material approved by the engineer. We recommend that the "working pad" have a minimum thickness of 18 inches beneath manhole structures. The working pad material should be densely compacted into the subgrade soils with the backhoe bucket or compactor during placement. All slough and disturbed subgrade soils should be removed from the base of the pipe trench before placing the pipe bedding material. The post-construction settlement of pipeline segments or manholes constructed using conventional trenching techniques is not expected to exceed ! /2 inch. provided that the subgrade is prepared as described above. \\kli _ seo.\vol 1 \library\ 1997',wpdrnft\60 17r09 5 .doc Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder. Inc. Pnge8ofll Dale Printed: 10/10/97 ffi KLEINFELDER 6.2.2 Hydrostatic Uplift Some of the manholes will be subject to hydrostatic uplift due to a relatively shallow groundwater table. Please refer to the logs of the borings for information on site groundwater levels. Resistance to uplift can be developed by the dead weight of the structure and fiiction along the sides of structure. Friction resistance can be computed using a coefficient of friction of 0.35 applied to the lateral soil pressures. This coefficient of friction value includes a factor of safety of about 1.5. We recommend that lateral soil pressures for uplift resistance be computed using an equivalent fluid density of55 pcfbelow the groundwater table, and 30 pcfbelow the groundwater table. 6. 2.3 Pavement Sections We anticipate that it will be most cost effective to restore the pavement in construction areas by repairing the disturbed areas rather than by repaving the entire street. We recommend that the subgrade in areas to be paved be probed or proofrolled with heavy rubber-tired construction equipment prior to paving. Any unsuitable areas should be recompacted, if practical, or removed and replaced with structural fill. We recommend that the probing or proofrolling of subgrade areas be observed by a representative of our firm to identify areas needing remedial work and to assess the adequacy of subgrade conditions. Provided that trench backfill and pavement subgrade areas have been prepared as recommended, we recommend that pavement sections be designed using a CBR value of 15. We can review the pavement designs prepared by the City of Renton, if desired. 7.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 7.1 Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation Some of the design details for the project were not available at the time of preparation of this report. We strongly recommend that our firm be given the opportunity to review the geotechnical aspects of the project plans and specifications as the design is being developed to confirm the applicability of our recommendations, or to make the appropriate modifications. It is possible that this review might indicate the need for supplemental field explorations and engineering analysis, depending on the issues involved. 7 .2 Project Bid Documents During the bidding process any questions regarding this report shall be directed to the City. The geotechnical consultant will not respond to any questions from bidders, but will direct them to the City. It has been our experience during the bidding process that contractors often contact us to discuss the geotechnical aspects of the project. Informal contacts between Kleinfelder and an individual contractor could result in incorrect or incomplete information being provided to the contractor. \lkli_sea\vol l \library\1997\wpdrru\\60 l 7r09.5.doc Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Pnge9ofll Dnle Printed: 10/10/97 Ill! KLEINFELDER Therefore, we recommend a pre-bid meeting be held to answer any questions about the report prior to submitial of bids. If this is not possible, questions or clarifications regarding this report should be directed to the project Owner or his designated representative. After consultation with Kleinfelder, the project Owner ( or his representative) should provide clarifications or additional information to all contractors bidding the job. 7 .3 Construction Observation and Testing The recommendations presented in this report are based on the assumption that an adequate program of tests and observations will be made during construction to verify compliance with these recommendations. These tests and observations should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: 1. Observations and testing during site preparation and earthwork. • 2. Observation and testing of construction materials. 3. Consultation as may be required during construction. 8.0 LIMITATIONS The recommendations contained in this report are based on the field explorations and our understanding of the proposed project. The investigation was performed using a mutually agreed upon scope of work. It is our opinion that the study was a cost-effective method to explore the subject site and evaluate some of the potential geotechnical concerns. The soils data used in the preparation of this report were obtained from the test borings completed at the site. It is possible that variations in soils exist between the locations explored. The nature and extent of soil variations may not be evident until construction occurs. If any soil conditions are encountered at the site which are different from those described in this report, our firm should be immediately notified so that we may make any necessary revisions to our recommendations. In addition, if the scope of the proposed project, pipeline grades, or other aspects of the project change from the descriptions given in this report, our firm should be notified. Our scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. This report has been prepared for use in design and construction of the subject project in accordance with the generally accepted standards of practice at the time the report was written. No warranty, express or implied, is made. \\kl i _ sea\vol 1 \library\ 1997\wpdrnft\60 17 r09 S .doc Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. Pag~ IOofll Date Printtd: 10/I0/97 W KLEINFELDER This report may be used only by the Client and for the purposes stated, within a reasonable time from its issuance. Land use, site conditions (both on-and off-site), or other factors including advances in man's understanding of applied science may change over time and could materially affect our findings. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after 12 months from its issue. Kleinfelder should be notified if the project is delayed by more than 12 months from the date of this report so that a review of site conditions can be made, and recommendations revised if appropriate. It is the CLIENT'S responsibility to see that all parties to the project including the designer, contractor, subcontractors, etc., are made aware of this report in its entirety. The use of information contained in this report for bidding purposes should be done at the Contractor's option and risk. Any party other than the Client who wishes to use this report shall notify Kleinfelder of such intended use by executing the "Application for Authorization to Use" which follows this document as an appendix. Based on the intended use of the report, Kleinfelder may require that additional work be performed and that an updated report be issued. Non-compliance with any of these requirements will release Kieinfelder from any liability resulting from the use of this report by any unauthorized party. \\kli sen\voll \Jibra,y\1997\wpdraftl.60 I 7r095.doc Copyright 1997 Kl,infeld<f, Inc. Png~llofll Date Printed: l0/10/97 .. , ¥' ----' -\:r•·':l': , !t;z"! \ -'thlet1c ii J 'f~e._td : f .. ~-.., . ., -,; 11· ~ Reference: USGS 7.5' Topographic Map, Issaquah and Renton Quadrangles Washington, 1949 and 1950, Photo Revised 1973 APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 1000 2000 1 Inch • 2000 feet Site Plan City of Renton Ill KLEINFELDER PROJECT NO. 60-1674-01 September, 1997 FILE NO. 167401.PPT NE 5th St Storm System Improvements Renton, WA -~· 11 ·'I . ' .. ;/ \\ .. ~ -•-' PLATE 1 ~ N ~ " ;;' 0 0 co " .8 " l !J ] ' 0 1l ~-t-0 ..;, • e -!i "O £ :z g -< al fi ~!I~-~ .. Ji I ~ ~ 0., = 0 0 .,g;! • ~ .. ill ,s ~ ,. ~ .. U,j Q .... U,j u.. z 9 ... U,j ~ .... ~ ~ I 0 z ~ :;: ~ ~ "' ~ ~ s l ! ., .( "' I ! 0 ., t ! 'E § I ~ ' > SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJORDMSIONS GROUP GROUP NAME COARSE GRAVEL CLEAN ow WBu..GRADRD ORAVBL, FINB TO COAR.SB GRAVBL GRAINED GRAVEL SOILS More Thao 500/o OP POORLY-GRADHD GRAVEL of Coarse Fraction Sill'Y ORAVHr. Retained on GRAVEL OM No. 4Siovo WITH FINES More Than 500/o oc CLAYBY GRAVEL Retained on No. 200 Sieve SAND CLEAN SW WELL-ORADBD SAND, FINB 'IO COARSE SAND SAND SP POORLY .ORADBD SAND More Than 50% ofCoane Fraction SM Sn:rY SAND Passe, SAND No. 4 Sieve ' WITH FINES SC CLAYEY SAND SILT AND CLAY ML srr.r FINE INORGANIC GRAINED SOILS Liquid Limit CL = LcssThan 50 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY More Than -'O"/o SILT AND CLAY MH Sill' OF IIlGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC Sill' p...., INORGANIC No, 200 Sicvo CH CLAY OF lilOH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY Liquid Limit .SO or More ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC Sill' HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PRAT PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS I l GRAVEL SAND i BOULDERS COBBLES SILT I CLAY I Coarse I Fine eoarse I Mediwn I Fine 12" 3" 3/4" #4 #10 #40 #200 0.002mm DESCRIPTIVE TERMS USED WITH SOILS CONSISTENCY & APPARENT DENSITY MOISTURE CONTENT SILTS AND CLAYS SANDS & GRAVELS Strongest I Hant Very Dense Wettest 1 Wet Very Stiff Dense \eryMoist Stiff Mediwn Dense Moist Mediwn Stiff Loose Slightly Moist Weakest Soft Very Loose Driest Dry Very Soft NOTES: SOIL MOISTIJRE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classifcation is based on visual examination of soil Dry -Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on Moist • Damp, but no visible water ASTM D2487-90. 3. Description ofsoU density or consistency arc based on Wet· Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is interpretation of blow ~mt data, visual appearance of obtained from below water table soils and/or test data. Hi KLEINFELDER KEY TO SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND TERMS Copyright 1997 Klcinfcldc:r, rnc. LEOBND2.PRJ! PLATE 3 SAMPLE TYPE I BULK/BAG SAMPLE MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLER (2-1/2 inch outside diameter) STANDARD PENETRATION SPLIT SPOON SA.J\,IPLER (2 inch outside diameter) SHELBY TUBE (3 inch outside diameter) § SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED SYMBOLS LABORATORY TESTS AL Atterberg limits CP Compaction CS Consolidation DS Direct shear GS Grain-size analysis %F Percent fines HA Hydrometer analysis SK Penneability SM Moisture content MD Moisture and density SP Swelling pressure PP . Pocket penetrometer TV Torvane TX Triaxial compression UC Unconfined compression CA Chemical analysis Note: Blow count is the nun1ber of blows required to drive tl1e sampler 12 inches, or other indicated distance, using a 140-pound hannner falling 30 inches. "P" indicates sample pushed with weight of hammer or against weight of drill rig. GENERAL NOTES I. The reader must refer to the discussion presented in the report text, the Key to Soil Classification and Tenns, and the exploration logs for a proper undersla!]ding of subsurface conditions. 2. Lines separating strata on the logs represent approximate boundaries only. Actual transitions may be gradual. 3. No warranty is provided as to the continuity of soil conditions between individual sample locations. 4. Boring logs represent general soil conditions observed at the point of exploration on the date indicated. BORING LOG LEGEND 1H KLEINFELDER Copyright 1997 Kleinfelder, Inc. KA.LOG _LEGEND PLATE4 Surface Condltlona: Asehalt Concrete Pavement Date Drilled: 7115/97 Logged By: KLB Groundwater observed at 14.5 ft. during drllllng. Plezometer ln&talled Approx. Surface Elev. (ft): 285 Groundwater. to 17.5 ft. No groundwater meaaured In 2!!!:ometer on 913197. Total Oeplh: 19 Laboratory Field DESCRIPTION I ! f l I~ ] 1 l i I l !! V, i ] f t i:,u • cl!-.. " 0 GP-GM 3"as It concrete vement ,c Brown aancty gravel with allt (medium denae, mo(st) FILL l 0 ,0 -SP Brown ftne to medium uncl with occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) X GS 4 14 ·:· - 5 --5 .• ·. -Becomea very dem~e with gravel X SM 2 63 / .. - 10-~10 .. ~ SM 10 50/5 ;;t;{'. 15 -1fsl Becomeawet >-15 . -u GP Gray sandy gravel with occasional cobbles and a trace of ellt (very dense, wet} '6:<;: ~ 50/5 )0 I) ,oo ,f\o 20-'-20 ' 25 25 LOG OF BORING B-1 1H KLEINFELDER City of Renton Northeast 5th Street Storm System Improvements ~IW7ICltW.&diw,l:le. LOO_OP_BOa.lHO f017MOI~? Proje<>t # 60-1674-01 I PLATES NOTE: Seo Plates 3 and 4 for Explanation of Symbol, Surface Condition,: Aaehalt Concrete Pavement Date Drilled: 7/15197 Logged By: KLB Groundwater obler\led at 13.5 ft. during drilllnp. Plezometer ln1talled Approx. Surface Elev. (ft): 281 Groundwater. to 17.5 ft. Groundwater measured at 17.4 ft. In J:!lezometer on 913197. Total Depth: 19 laboratory Field DESCRIPTlON -A l fc ] j I l ! I! I I ii i 1 ,,,.o ! oe. SP-SM 3" aar1hatt concrete flavement ... Brown fine sand with allt (very looae to looae, molal) FILL . · . .. ,: ·: .. -: ', 6 GS 13 7 ··: •. ·,; •,.• 5 -... 5 ::'.', SP Brown fine to medium aand wtth a trace of 1ltt (medium dense, moist) - X SM 5 25 ·. - 10-<: ~10 .. •;. . ... SM Brown allty fine to medium aand (dense to very dense, molat to wet) _.·:. -~·: •,': ' .. · . ··: ··::. ' ·.-: -... ',•, '.• " X • . .. SM 14 33 ..... .; .. :·.- ~ .·:· -:. \ ::--..... 15 -:·: ',• -15 . •' · . ·:_· . .:-:-:-....... .-:·,:·:::· · .. . ', " .'; ·t: . :·- -.'·:· . .-:· X :-'_': ._.._.. 64 .. > ·.: . : •,, ~ 20--20 25 25 LOG OF BORING B-2 181 KLEINFELDER City of Renton Northeast 5th Street Storm System Improvements ~ltnlCltW.ldcr,b:.. LOO_OP_BOllINO '817MOI~ Project# 60-1674-01 I PLATE6 NOTE: See Plates 3 and 4 for Explanation of Symbols Surface Condition&: Asphalt Concrete Pavement Date Orllled: 7/15/97 Logged By: KLB Groundwater: GroundWater observed at 23.5 ft. during drllllng. Plezometer Installed to 24.0 ft. Groundwater measured at 24.5 ft. In plezometer on 913/97. Approx. Surface Elev. (ft): _:2,:::80:.._ ____ _ Total Depth: 25 Laboratory Aelcl DESCRIPTION l ! f l I~ 1 ] l ! ! 1 1 ~ ii ! f ! ~u o!!:. "' C) .. SP 3" a&"halt Concrete Pavement Brown fine to medium sand wHh a trace or silt (very loose, moist) FILL 1.·. -,: ~ SM 7 4 - 5 -SP Brown fine to medium sand with a trace of silt (dense, moist) 5 :_: -) GS 4 34 - 10--10 Gray fine to medium sand with lllt, occaalonal gravel and cobbles (very denae, moist) SM 8 15 -~ 15 Becomes wtth gravel and cobbles X SM 5 50/5.5 .::·:. ; · . . ): 20-·.; -20 0 C:t';... GP G: 1 ~ne gravel with sand, a trace of silt and occasional cobbles (very denae, moist to l:, D'- 50/6 ,oo 'l:>°r b D "- ~ SM 7 ,O Q _L...J...._...1.._~--l...--.l.o..L(\~o~l...--J.... _______________________ .J_ 25 25 1H KLEINFELDER LOO_or_OOIUNO 6017MOli~ NOTE; Seo Plates 3 and 4 for Explanation of Symbols LOG OF BORING B-3 City of Renton Northeast 5th Street Stonn System Improvements Project# 60-1674--01 I PLATE 7 Surface Condition•: Aaphatt Concrete Pa\lement Dalo Drilled: 7115/97 Logged By: KLB Groundwater: No groundwater obseNed during drilling. Plezometer lnatalled to 14.0 ft. Groundwater measured at 8.0 ft. In plezometer on 9/3/97. Approx. Surface Elev. (tt): _:2=c58,_ ____ _ Laboratory Field l i f l I~ I i i ! I ~i ii ;!:-0 ! I s II! o!!:. "' ML - IX SM 13 45 - 5 - ::)::\ SM :-: . .-:: ·.- ~ SM 13 10- SM 8 50/8 ' .-. .. · 15 - ·-·.··:"-:?: 20- 25 ID KLEINFELDER ~ ltt1 Klcktddar, b:, LOO OF BOlUHO '°17M017.0P1 --91$197 NOTE: Seo Plates 3 and 4 for Explanation of S)'Dlbols Total Depth: 15 DESCRIPTION 3" aa"'hatt concrete "avement Gray brown aandy 11/l with occalional gravel (hard, molat to wet) Gray brown to wet allty fine to medium aand with occaalonal gravel and cobbles (very denae, moist) LOG OF BORING B-4 City of Renton Northeast 5th Street Storm System Improvements Project# 60-1674-01 I PLATES -5 ~10 ' 15 -20 25 Surface conctltlon1: Aaphalt Concrete Pavement Dale Drilled: 7/15/97 . LOQ99d By: KLB Groundwater: Groundwater oblerved at 12 ft. during drflllng. Plezometer lnatalled to 15.0 ft. Groundwater measured at 5.2 ft. In plezometer on 8/'J/97. Approx. Surface Elev. (ft): _,2c,49:,_ ____ _ Laboratory -IX GS 15 ·- 5 - -IX SM 14 - 10- I~ 15 - 20- - 25 29 25 26 Field I ''; :··, ·.· . ·. . . . : .... -:_.:·· -.:: : .. ·: : :·: ... · .. .... •. ·::. :--._. / .·.-. /}} ... SP-SM :. ·.-.-: ·. . .. :\} .... 1H KLEINFELDER LOO_OF_BORINO 6017MOli2'~ NOTE: Seo Plates 3 aod 4 for Explaoation of Symbols Total Depth: 15 DESCRIPTION 12" asphalt concrete pavement with a 1" thick zone ot base course In the middle Brown 1Jlty fine aand (medium dense, moist) FILL Dark gray 1llty fine to medium sand with occa1lonal gravel and cobbles (medium dense, moist lo wet) Becomes silty fine aand wtth occcaslonal gravel and cobbles Brown fine sand wtth ailt and oecaalonal gravel {medium dense, wet) LOG OF BORING B-5 City of R.enton Northeast 5th Street Storm System Improvements Project# 60-1674--01 I PLATE 9 -5 -10 15 -20 25 Surface COndltlons: A1~1t COnc:rete Pavement Date Drtlled: 7/15/97 Logged By; KLB Groundwater: Groundwater observed at 13.5 ft. during drilling. Piezometer lnatalled Approx. Surface Elev. (ft): 211 to 18.0 ft. Groundwater measured at 11.8 ft. In etezometer on 913197. Total Depth: 20 Laboratory Aeld DESCRIPTION I ! f l f~ ~ J ! l t 1 sl ii ;,,o j r 1 0 o!:. ... SM 3" H"halt concrete "avement Dark brown 1l1tv fine sand tverv loose. moist) FILL ',·, •' SM Dark brown silty fine to medium sand with roots and occaslonal gravel (very loose, :ii{\ :·-.: molal) FILL --·· X ·:·:. --. SM 19 4 -· . •,, .-.-:· ,•,_' -ML Gray sandy silt with occasional gravel (hard, moist) 5 --5 -x SM 15 49 - 10-~10 I\ SM Brown allty fine to medium sand with occaalonal gravel (denae, wet} f-I\ 1-._.. I> 39 r> -I.·:-:·,: 15 -'·' ·.', ~ 15 ·-::. · .. ··::, ·.: · .. •.•, ML Brown 1llt with occaalonal &and (very atlff, wet)) - IX SM 28 31 - 20-20 . 25 25 LOG OF BORING B-6 1H] KLEINFELDER City of Renton Northeast 5th Street Storm System Improvements Cop)1lcl:f. 1"'1 XkW!:lda", h:. LOO_OP_BOIDIO 6017MOl7.0PI ... , Project# 60-1674-01 I PLATE 10 NOTE: See Plates 3 and 4 for Explanation of Symbols .: -0 ~ UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ~ ! GRAVEL COARSE SAND I HEDl"1 SANO FIN[ SAND FIU[S 6 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES ----MICRONS •. • " " " I °' " J~ 2t 2" it l" f t t 4 8 10 16 20 30 so 80 200 50 20 10 5 ? ~ , 1 I I ' 100 i--" ' ·------t--------t---1-----1---1----1-------1 ~ ,,, ' ----·-- m ~ -i-----r---· -----··-··· 1---··-- 6 z \ -90 ... ' 'Tl ', -i----t-~1--;---1--1-r---t--t-----t----t---t------__, rn ····--··-. _,____ -------· -------------· ,-. 1-.., _ BO 0 ' ,- rr, ... .____ 70 ,a - ----- I-~~ f--. --· -------,-------, 60 G) ' m £! ---·--1+=------· --==·---__ -__ ·--1--------1 z ----· ' --4{J ' .m~ a N 1 30 ~ m-r -. 2~ \ ~ en. , 20~ ~~ -~ ~ -~ ro ~ C 10 ~ -1 ~ 0 ~ Z O ~ 50000 10000 5000 1000 500 100 50 . 20 10 5 1 MICRONS 111,1,111 I 111111,1,1,1' 111111,1,111, ll!lllil1l1I I '111,I, I I I 1 1 , , 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 • 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 , r 1 • 1 1 1 , 1 , , , ~-----13 2 l 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001 0.0005 0.0001 0 .. 00005 lNChES ~ EQUIVALENT GRAIN DIAMETER ~ . 1-d ~ SYMBOL BOP.ING NO. SAMPLE DEPTHCft} !;_Lj\.SSIFICATION MOISTURE, CON'fEN'r (%) 1-1' B -1 3 SP 4 ------------- ,:: a, " ~ UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ~ I GRAVEL COARSE SAND HEDllJI SAND FINE SAND flllES i = U.S. STANDARD SIFVE SIZES MICRONS .. •• • • • I a, ;,:: I" 2f 2" It I" f t t 4 8 IO 16 20 30 50 80 200 50 20 10 5 0 1 • • I • 100 ~ I""' ~ l'TI +:>,, -i----• 0 z 90 ..... ' ..,., _,,, -·-"1--+---ic--+-1--t-lf----t--+----t----+---+-------, r,, ---r-· --------1---1---- , 80 I""' ' 0 --11-"<t--t-+--+-+--i,_r-t-_---+-+----1----,f----t--------j m '-10 ;:i::I 60 \ -----1-------~ • ' 50 G) • ::0 })i t---. -· ... --··-. r---·---------1---------1 40 z . --\---. ·-.. -··· ---· -,---------< U> -I -1 --~ 1 0 NI 30 ~ l'T1 N r Q~ ~ ~ ' w ~ ---4 N i----------• -.. ----. ---·-------·------------·-·· ·--·-·-----m ~ 1' ~ ~ JO ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ Z O c;-, 50000 10000 S000 · 1000 500 100 SO 20 10 5 1 MICRONS I I I I I I I I , JI I I I I I I ·1 I e I t 11 I I I I, I t I , I I I I I I I Ir I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1, 111111 1 1'1 1 1 1 111111 1 1 1 1 1 1, 111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111 1 r 1 1 1, 111111 11------13 2 l D.S 0.1 a.as 0.01 0.005 0.001 0.0005 0.0001 0 .. 00005 IHCH[I ~ EQUIVALENT GRAIN DIAMETER ~ ~ SYMBOL BORING NO. SAMPLE DEPTH(fl) ~_Lf.2.SIFICATION MOISTURE CONTENT (%) B -2 3 SP 5 ------------- ,:: ' a> -0 ;o 0 ~ "' n .... z 0 °' 0 ' -°' -l .... ' 0 - !I ;,:: r- m -z 'Tl m r- 0 m ,a G) ::0 l> -z (/) tt1 N ' rn w 9 en (/) ' --l N ::0 ID C --l 0 z -0 '"" i,-1. :,, .... ~ en UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GAAVEL COARSE SANO HEDIU1 SANO FINE SAHO FIIIES U.S. STANDARD SifVE SIZES . ---·--------MICRONS I jK 2}°' l" it .. . ! . ' . l" l-' T 4 8 10 16 20 30 50 80 200 50 20 10 5 ' ' ' . . . . . . 100 f--~~ ·--··· -· ~ ---------e--------------- ' 90 ' -- f-----y·--1----,_ ----- ' --80 I=\ 70 ' ' 60 I 50 --.. • ' 4(J ' ... ' 0 \ ... 30 :,, r ' "O \ fTl ' 20 "' n ------·------_\ ----fTl :z ... "O 10 :,,. u, u, -z 0 C) soooo 10000 sooo 1000 soo 100 so 20 10 s l MICRONS I I I. I ' I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ) I I I I I I I r I I r I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I , I I I I I I ) I I I I I I I I I I JI I I I I I I 1 I I I I ti ' I ' I I I I ' I I I 111111 1 r 1 1 1 I I I I I ii I I I I 3 2 l o.s O.J a.as 0.01 o.oos 0.001 0.0005 0.0001 0.00005 U.Ch(S EQUIVALENT GRAIN DIAMETER S'/MBOL BOP.ING NO. SAM_PL E DEPTIJ ffi} CLASSIFICATION MOISTURE CONTENT (%) B-3 8 SP 4 ;:: " "' ,, UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 0 ~ I "' n GRAVEL COARSE SANO H£0llt1 SAN:0 FINE SANO fltlES ---i z U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES MICRONS 0 J" 21 ~ 2-it . . • -• . °' ;:i,::: I" ! r T 4 8 10 16 20 30 50 80 200 50 20 10 5 0 100 • . ~ . . . . -r-' ~ m ~ -.. --··· -.... -t-· f-f--• 0 z 90 - "Tl -·····--t----.. ----IT! --. -----· ·-····-·-·-· ------"',, --·-··-... . .. ,-------· -. . ·--.. -··------... ··--. ·-· ..... r-I------BO 0 m ..:-,., . ~ ,c 70 ' 60 ' G) ' 50 :;o l> z ' 40 ' (/) ' ---i ·-tc ' 0 N • . --i f'T1 Vt 30 :,, r ~~ -c "' (/) • 20 ;o -l -n .. "' :;o z CD ---i -c C 10 )> -l V> V> 0 -z z 0 c.; 50000 · 10000 5000 1000 500 100 so 20 10 5 l HI CRON$ I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I , I • I I f I I I I I I I r I t I I I I II I I I ii r I I I , I 1 , , , I I I I I I 1 1 1' 11111 1 1'1 1 r 1 11111 I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l 2 I 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001 0.0005 0.0001 0.00005 INCHES " :EQUIVALENT GRAIN DIAMETER ..- 1-d :t> (%) ---i SYMBOL BORING NO_. SAMPLE DEPTH (.fl.) CLASSIFICATION MOISTURE CONTENT ~ ,n B-5 3 SM 15 ;;:: a, " ~ UNIFIED SOILS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 5 ! GkAiEL COARSE SAl<O MEO!ltl SAl<D FINE SAND Flfl[S i5 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES MICRONS g ;z::: ]"2-(2" 1t" 1~ 1." f'. t°' 4 6 10 16 20 30 50 80 200 50 20 10 5 I , 1 • • I 100 -r-23 m ~ ~-------~ -: __ :~ · -·-------1----1-------1 ~ ------·· -· ·-- 8 z 90 .,, ··-t--- l'T1 --·-------___ ___::,,,. --·---· ---·---··-·· .. -·--··---. ... . . ---·····-. -·. -. --- r-l--1---···· 80 0 ~ ; ; 70 ' ' ' 60 G) 50 ~ ' ~o -, z O 40 (/) ~ ' --; --~ " C) ~~ w~ oq ·. ~ -~ ' ~ CJ) 20 ;o -lt'-l -·---· -----;;:: ~> --2 ro~ ..... C '1::1 10 ~ -l~ ~ 0~ ~ Z O "' 50000 10000 5000 1000 500 100 50 20 10 5 } MJ CRONS IJJ,1,111 r IIJlll1J1l 1 I 1 1111111!1!11, llllllil1l1I 1 11111!, I, I 1 1 1 1 11111 1 1•1 1 1 1 111111'1'1'1' llflll'l'l'I 111111'[ l'I I l""I 11------13 2 l 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001 0.0005 0.0001 0._00005 INCH(S ;'? EQUIVALENT GRAIN DIAMETER ~ ~ COMPOSITESAMPLE CLASSIFICATION MOISTURE CONTENT (%) ; Cooswofumplca3, 8, 13 and 3 feetfromllorinp B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-5, re,peclivoly. SM 9 . ·-.. 140 ' ' SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ' \ WATUIIAL DESCRIPTION; ' \ \ \ \ Composite Sample. \ \ Brown gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel 135 \ \ \ \ TEST SYMBOL / ,\ \ \\ \ U:ST MUHOD ASTM 0-1557 I \ I \ \ liU,XIMUW DRY 133 OtMSl'TY IPCf I 130 OPTIMUM WATl.11 8 ' ' \ CONTUT (%) ' \ \ UNIFl!D SOIi. SM >-CLASS1'1CATION 0 \ \ NATURAL WA.TIU 9 0 CONTlNT 1%1 i.. \ \ LIOUIO LIMIT !:! \ \ PLASTIC LOUT CD 125 \ :::> SPECIFIC GRA.VrTY (.) '\ \ a: \ \ "" \ \ 0.. VI I \ \ C \ z \ :::> \ \ 0 0.. \ I ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES >-\ \ ::r:: ' .. C, 115 ' w \ \ 2.75 3'l: -2.70 !:: \ v-2,65 z ,;: => ' \ >-\ \ a: C 110 \ ' ' \ \ \ ' \ \ \ ' 100 ,, \ ' \. \ ' \ \ ' \. '" 1000 4 e 12 16 20 24 WATER CONTENT -PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT PLATE Iii KLEINFELDER COMPACTION TEST RESULTS 16 PROJECT NO. 60-1674-01 Sept 5, 1997 ... -6 l_ .. OVEN DRY MOISTURE TEST · ASTM D-2216 PROJECT C-,f-y c>f lfe,,,.-fo,,, PROJECT No.60-/(i,7'-frO/ I SAMPLE INFO. ---------------------'LAB NO.--,-,:----- TESTED BY v DATE 7/301'1"7 DATE RECIEVED REVIEWED BY ________ ~ NI£. '/3RI> .5-r f'~"JEC.. T r~J;./ ~ Specimen Nuu:bor B-r-2 B-1 S-2-E!:> -I S3 Diah !!uoihor cc.. 17, '10 ?/ ll"t. Dish & Wet Soil 3C>C... 3?Y 7.-'fl) , 't .3 /07,C> s, lie. D i,h " Dry Soii / ?t<"t , :: a' :;z.."!,(,,,t':? 9"7 ' . f 2 \It:. of Dish 99. 93. q/, c,3 . ;co,8't,, 'llt. o! 'Ila t<>r I 51. oo -;,,.qo 1 , 1 I Vt. o! Dry Soil '1 7. '-/ 5' 11u.,l. 77(,2', Puc=t Hoi,curc 3ob, (, &-) z. .o /.• I CJ• I/.~ Sp• c i.co.n lluc.!i a r 13-)...., S-/ B-2. s-3 I B-3 5-I . • Dish ~or qi. 31 J. I • 33. 20 . 31' \It. Di•b & \lot Soil ") I"/, :;. 2.. 'J-'Z.7, ~ 2-<fD. 00 ·0. .~ . -,· \le. Diab & Dry Soil ,qq,;.i.'7 2. ,., S . I ?. '2.?"!,;.7 \It. a! Di•h /..-f 7-. I 5' &-10.52-t-1),l'J .. \It. o! \later 19.93. 2_.u,23 12, 73 lit. oi' Dry Soil l':;7, I~ It.. 7. GO I 3'&,, <.':l& Percent ·P.oisturc I 2 .I.:~ / 'f • df (,,. ~.i'I Specuoen ~mb er R-3 S-3 /3 -s. S...t./ /!,-'-/. S-2-, , , Dhh !:Uo:hor I I 1:3 J.... • ,z.1_ 3r.cr 7 I llt. Dbh & ll•t Soil '}.... 'f I • & er 1--?.. cs. (e.1 2-71, ¥2- lit. Dish & Dry Soil 7. l-7 I (r9 "). 1.. -, • () S" 1"'1S°,12. 1-1 t:. of Dhb '17-,C7 '11. c;q '1/,3'.2.... \It. of \.ta.tar I tf . O('i s-. (,, 'f :z..e,., 3c) Vt. of Dry Soll I S" -~ • {,,. '2. 1-o~.J/ ;20~.ll"l) Perceoc ¥Di~~ 7, 5 <I 4 .~? I ?.. ' 9!) ~:r::1-:1• "'1";2""'1"' L /"\ f, 'I-._.· OVEN DRY MOISTURE 3T · ASTM D-2216 F'ROJECT c; f-L of' 11,., .. -fc,... PROJECT NO. {po -/(, ?°f'--6/ SAMPLE INFO. ---------'------------'LAB NO.r=--=----- TESTED BY W N)TE 7/!e./97 DATE REC!EVED REVIEWED BY ________ _ Spec:i.moa Nu11:!lQr . ff~. S-'2.. ~ (5 ,-tf 5 ..-;:, ·15-&:.. 5-) I , D 1o h l'!i.n•h • r !,'1", IC, 3'.Z..7 3~ q- / lie. Dish & lice Soil 1.37.03 307,/'r ;:2.../(p.©/ "lit. Dish t. Dry So1i '2. 7-7 • 'J.C, Z.7't, 12-/r;; 7, 9'i5 llt. of Diab t/1,'tt/ '-/),9::J. "3 9 I (r.C::, Ile. . of llotar I 'r, 77 . 3! ,D? Z.°ir,&3 ' \lt. of Dry Soil ! '6D • 't "2-l-12, 20 /t,l~,'?:.. Porco.at Holaeur-c 'e,)'7 l"/-,2'f I 9 , 3r.:.> q~··' :;~~ , I--. ,3-'f, s-; I {3 -~ s-;;. Sp • C iJ::> QJl l!u Cl!> • r B-3,-s~ ,, . • A Dish !l<=hor ' 16 llt. Dish & llot Soil 3t.t, 3 :;2... S'"'i ;;., ~D 3 ?f'-/ d ~'t lie. Diah & Dry Soil 3~!.(c.l '11').. 7? t'c/7 ,4 J Ile. of Diah IOt>,S" I 18'. '!"/ "f 7. S-1 'II c. of \/acer-I(.., 7) SD, 0:3. 37, O':l ' Ile. of Dry Soil 2-S /, I () ,391t, l.3 2~~. $"2. Perceae "P.oistur-c ~.,s 1 i.., ro . I#,"("/' Spo.ci.!l,en ~mbcr-/3 -tr>. S-'-t DI.oh !:Uo:.bor-;/ I-It. Dish & I.lac Soil 3 ?'i, 7/ "II t. Diih & Dry Soil 3itf,33 'II c. of Dhh 17. 37 "II t. of 'llat•r ,o.~o/ Uc. of Dry SoU i.1.5 • 9" Per-ceoe P~l•ellf 2 7, 9c... u ":I 1J ., :I :l•r,,· L SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATE ASTMC-136 SAMPLE INF0._,../3._-___,_( __ __;...S""---+/----LAB NO. _____ _ TESTEDBY_~lt/~S_L_ ... _________ DATE '[") I /97 DATE RECEIVED ________ ~REVIEWED BY ________ _ Total Wet Weight Plus Tare Tare Total Wet Weight Wet Weight Minus No. 4 Dry Weight Minus No. 4 Total Dry Weight Dry Weight of Sub-Sample U.S. STANDARD SIEVE WEIGHT RETAINED ACCUMULATIVE GROSS TARE =>/q ,, ~€'.ID I , I .,..,..,_ I{) 2.-0 7rJ. "l'o (p 0 .'iO .2-I ~n 1,..7 NET ID l) 31.'1't I(), y ~ J.r D GE00017.DOC/XL.S H301UNl31~ ffl 1-/, )/ , ...... "; ,., MOISTURE CONTENT Dish No. C. Wet Weight Sample and Dish 300. s.S:- Dry Weight Sample and Dish -i-"i"3 , I, IP Weight of Water I., t "t Weight of Dish 99, C/CX Dry Weight of Sample 19 3, 6~ Water Content, % Dry Weight --='3'--'-.,..5',"'i'.:,'-- PERCENT RETAINED ACCUMULATIVE 7, l. 3 ·:,,-1, oo 7?. ,0(, '67. !-I PERCENT PERCENT PASSING OFTOTAL So.s; 11 ,r':f ;: -. .•, ! er, o'> ) 2 .l Cl '-1. -~ z.. SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATE ASTMC-136 PROJECT_~ft~c>_vi_. '--'-f;._c,_.,, _____ ,PROJECTNO. @ -/c.; ?'f ~o/ SAMPLE INFO. B -'2-/ s -I LAB NO. ______ _ TESTEDBY_W_.S_L-_________ .DATE 7 /30/97 DATE RECEIVED ________ ~REVIEWED BY ________ _ Total Wet Weight Plus Tare Tare Total Wet Weight Wet Weight Minus No. 4 Dry Weight Minus No. 4 Total Dry Weight Dry Weight of Sub-Sample U.S. WEIGl:IT RETAINED STANDARD ACCUMULATIVE SIEVE GROSS I " --:;-2..,. ?,~ "") ~;2... i9 ., i) '.!,? .1-F' ?o C,. ~ '"l ~-~ t.J/" 11/,()'1' /n/', 'e(),•I[," !cD µ.7_ c 3 '1171") 30 7e- -7 r:' 0 GE00017.DOCJXLS lfl013JNl3lll Si,",J TARE NET .,_ r 11. 3 ''"/" '2- ZI, le,-II , // Jll.n -;.o. 'I I~ ,, ,&¥ :a,.,? Z(J, 3 / 4'1/17 71, ,., .··w,on "'' ,('4 '"' •t' t,:..,7,:1.. ,1.7/ J.)l,'b1 'J.I. ~ I Z./-.M. J.'17,"'f\ ').. () () fr (tJ,{,1 >S"-'" MOISTIJRE CONTENT Dish No. Wet Weight Sample and Dish Dry Weight Sample and Dish Weight of Water Weight ofDish Dry Weight of Sample Water Content,% Dry Weight PERCENT '3'15'1,0"f 3t-7,oa' / 'I O I /00. l:,(b 1.C.I,, 41- € . .2...~ RETAlNED PERCENT PERCENT ACCUMULATIVE PASSING OF TOTAL I • 2'( '1'(,' '2,.. I, ~ ~ s-. ., ~ qu,s'!; "/. I 7 <)·, 'o "l-"Jt>, If '-1.>7 ;.{.•, 10 7 3. 30 1<,,.i't (,,{', i 7 3 'I, I'.?, 3 ..,_' I -J 'il' 3. Z" / I,, , 7 I 1-:i-.'1/ (13.C'f l.'1?; '1 . 77 97. OfD ").' 9., 'f. 0 7. • "I SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATE ASTMC-136 PROJECT .£jp,,,.(o,,,. PROJECT NO. /e>O -~~ ------------· SAMPLE INF0._-=/3_.-_3-'--r_,S_-=z_=-------L.AB NO. _____ _ / TESTEDBY Jt/9~ DATE 7/;o;??' -~-------------· DATE RECEIVED _________ REVIEWED BY ________ _ Total Wet Weight Plus Tare Tare Total Wet Weight Wet Weight Minus No. 4 Dry Weight Minus No. 4 Total Dry Weight Dry Weight of Sub-Sample U.S. WEIGIIT RETAINED STANDARD ACCUMULATIVE SIEVE GROSS TARE t-f 1-5. ,-£ 'J.D. ~-tl /T) 2 / t:;z_ ';c,. ?..'r NET '). . tj!; (f), i'1 MOISTIJRE CONTENT Dish No. ,4..4 Wet Weight Sample and Dish 11 I ,2. &'-I Dry Weight Sample and Dish 1,,/ oo , ~l. WeightofWater 1 2 3\3" Weight of Dish /()&, II Dry Weight of Sample 3,,.c, , if Water Content,% Dry Weight 7'., I '..l- PERCENT RETAINED PERCENT PERCENT ACCUMULATIVE PASSING OF TOTAL o. ct 99, 2 -~ ,,.~~ '1. 5" 'l~ 5" !, '7 20 Jo;.. I:, :Z-;i.o. n 'o°l,53 « ~,,i.11. fo 'f, '1 ,. 1, I ~o }1-/'1, I,-; '7-C'. 7 5 11-3. <(7 ... ,i, 71-. 9 'J. 7. i 'ti,!, ?,(\ /~1,1. •H .·7-C'. %'7 "13.57 'i/7 • ..,., /:;,. .b /'l,.S /DD '37. 25 ').. 0. ?f) I(. ,§5' c;, 9 7, I 5 ,r; ';.O(> "J.. "I. 'S.,.. "),../, 1 '1 '(. 2 I 'f5 (,, 'f. '1 '. 7 I "=P-- -2-0 t> .tf' 'f °l'; OE00017.D0CXLs SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATE ASTMC-136 PROJECT f?, ,. ..;. ,., PROJECT NO. & 0 -I~ 7q -C'.I / SAMPLE INFO. __ P_. -_· _C_. ---~-'_.1 _____ ~LAB NO. ______ _ ' ?/~"' ... /97 TESTED BY _____ .(1..,_;""';_. c. ___________ .DATE. ___ -_'--'--'--- DATE RECEIVED ________ ~REVIEWED BY ________ _ Total Wet Weight Plus Tare Tare Total Wet Weight Wet Weight Minus No. 4 Dry Weight Minus No. 4 Total Dry Weight Dry Weight of Sub-Sample U.S. WEIGHT RETAINED STANDARD ACCUMULATIVE SIEVE GROSS TARE NET :!lt-1-' be..£:;, ~t/ /Z.-7..q, 3'? ?f-J1t,U7 /l) 31,c,;,_ ZD 3:t,74 £-Jo 3 t. ti lo If Z, 1--tr /OD '15, 13 ').(' 0 '1 r~. '"f/o -:i..DO CEOOO 17.DOCJX\.S H_3013~Nl3U ffl , ' , I ... ,, 15', 1>- 1-1.J'J,, ,.. ',s J.3 ,., 1-1 'CI ,,.'If. if!.,, J.!' . e;,;,, ID ,Cf, 53,,, .·'))./~ // .s" i..~.'5 -, (: '7(1, -·'. J ,, (!/,(> f).17 21'' 1q U.~) 110.Jf 'J...C. 10 .. ~.'13 Ill..•; 'J.1. oq ~5.71 1~1.w Dish No. MOISTIJRE CONTENf E;::: -- Wet Weight Sample and Dish ;/ (,, ~ · 0 ;c Dry Weight Sample and Dish "3 l 2 . ,;.i;. Weight of Water 3 3, t,, 'I' Weight of Dish .' oo. :·''< Dry Weight of Sample ~i.~. 7~ Water Content,% Dry Weight 1 '"t, 7 PERCENT RETAINED PERCENT PERCENT ACCUMULATIVE PASSING OF TOTAL (., . 7 q 3. 1, (,,' 7 10 ~ cc,., 3 • (,, I~. ? 'i' I, I '3". s z. :;, 3 7{,, 7 ,., ' '"' .2. ~.:, 7 I, 7 s.o 3 7. 'f ?,(. • ,. (,.$". fr 1,/, ',, ..,_ !, ) . t 12,0 r;q,5 tjO ~ II • -;. lo 71-2.? Z.'i II )_ zr;, 2- SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATE ASTMC-136 PROJECT __ /1'-e_.,,_-._ro_tA_--_____ J',...,ROJECTNO. (/,Q -/(p7Cf-.-CJ I H,,oc..-1-o .,. SAMPLE INF0._(3'"'=·;. .... ·$><=""'->-~·""'·'~~----_·. _i _e,,....,_.,..f'_".=.;s r'"'°'i,=P_L.AB NO. _____ _ ---:e:::_k_ TESTED BY_-/_t/_>_c..-. __________ D.ATE __ 7,_.'/_:::_,.CJ_/_9_7 __ DATE RECEIVED ________ _,REVIEWED BY ________ _ Total Wet Weight Plus Tare Tare Total Wet Weight Wet Weight :Minus No. 4 Dry Weight :Minus No. 4 Total Dry Weight Dry Weight of Sub-Sample U.S. WEIGIIT RETAINED .STANDARD ACCUMULATIVE SIEVE GROSS TARE NET -u;t 3':f. 73 11.08' r '3. t,'!, Y,_ St,, ,<?S-'1-() • 0-0 3 la.~> t-j ~'J...(c3 1-{). U) 32. "'1 I[' /.-/°!, 37 'J.f>!o(c. ~~·>I 2ri (ct,;1.i .. ,q ,b'?f' '-!'.(,,.o ,j_; 1) '{'I,~(,, 11. ,v 'Jt>. )(, 2, D <g {) • ,. ?--2-D ,(.,. 3 5e,J, !, /AO {.,(,l\2, ~I. l'f 4c . .,q 't o.O ~/.n~ 2-t) ,3 ?-3,:,,73 l?i~_Q. -:z_o e> -~- GEOOOl7.DOCIXLS MOISTURE CONTENT 6 Dish No. Wet Weight Sample and Dish Dry Weight Sample and Dish ~~~~~tr/ Weight of Water Weight ofDish Dry.Weight of Sample Water Content,% Dry Weight ___ _ PERCENT RETAINED PERCENT PERCENT ACCUMULATIVE PASSING OF TOTAL T /,') qt. '1' 3. I 17 .'t'f Tl CC I ., 'a°,:,'); ' '8. 'i"°t';. 'tl.1'1 "1, 1 C Z-3 .'f~ 7(,, '(' 2. C ,, .,, . -· 33, I.fr; t,/.ss Ci . t.·I { ~ S"!,?O '-r'(;, 3 I '/C • :Z../.,, lot,. u. 34. ?'I f'?,. j 5" 71,'1?-'l-'/!,.5"? '·? ?( '"61.!;, 19", <17 t. c,? /t,Ll7 I RECEIPT EG00004356 BILLING CONTACT Daniel Carey City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA 13-000188 PLAN -Environmental Review Technology Fee Printed On: February 12, 2013 Prepared By: Gerald Wasser --~=::::..--;:::::::::::;... TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Fee Payment City of R Ptann;n _enton g D,vision FEB 12 .. lU/J PAYMENT METHOD Interoffice Account Transfer Interoffice Account Transfer SUBTOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $1,000.00 $30.00 $1,030.00 $1,030.00 Page 1 of 1 • - . DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: D epartment Ch an1:e d Account Number 427.475485.018.594.3 l .63.000 FINANCE AND INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMO RAN.DU M February II, 2013 Casaundra Commodore, Finance & Information Services Department Ronald Straka, Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisot Re: INTERFUND TRANSFER REQUEST Instructions: Please note that failure to provide all digits will result in processing delays. All Signatures and correct do~umentation must be included. Please prepare the following inter-fund transfer: p bl' w k u JC or s Project, function, task, sub-task · Description Amount U65485, fD40; 0007, 0000 . NE 5th St and Edmonds $1,030.00 Ave NE Storm System Improvement Project Total $1,030.00 *Charged Department Authorization* r. APPROVALSIGNATURE: ~~1':i1<~f~ltf.--·~· Printed Name Ronald.Straka Date z./11/ 13 CREDIT: Account Number Project, function, task, sub-task Description Amount OIYl. -na·:i-, ·w5 « r,r, orq. C'. -1~r,m~\.L-D Pf tc:n . ev-~"' , o ,,,_.,r~l -fr-I C,00,00 " -' . E"-~~~,-,".., Z:IP .s-03, ct·orOc. ,-,r,1-.1 •. ~72... It, • Co~ ()(I '" &l... FPP 2,.. ,..__ ' L', /!,. \-:>.-=--\<a-G' . Total $1,030.00 Reason: Environmental Checklist Review Fee for Surface Water Utility Project. Cash Transfer Form/Finance/bh Revised 01/09