HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1Wetlands Report
Prepared for:
Maldi z In vest ments , LLC
1509 N 80 th St.
Seattle, W A 98103-4422
Prepared by:
Talbot Road S, Short Plat
Parcel # 302305-9071
Renton, Washington
Re-Align Environmental
Bill Granger, Owner
140 56 180th Ave SE
Renton , WA
(206) 790-6 132
Bi ll @ re-alignenv.com
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
RECE\VED
JP-N '2. \) 20\4
ell'!' Of RENTON
pv>-NNING DIVISION
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project Background .......................................................................................................... I
2.0 METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Wetland Delineation Protocol .......................................................................................... 1
2.1.1 Wetland Hydrology Parameter ................................................................................. 2
2.1.2 Hydric Soils Parameter ............................................................................................. 2
2.1.3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Parameter. .......................................................................... 3
2.2 Waters ofthe United States Delineation Protoco!... ......................................................... 4
3.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 General Site Characteristics ............................................................................................. 5
3.1.1 Topography ............................................................................................................... 5
3.1.2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................. 5
3.1.3 Soils ........................................................................................................................... 5
3.1.4 Vegetation ................................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Wetlands ........................................................................................................................... 7
3.2.1 Wetland Rating ......................................................................................................... 9
3.3 Streams ........................................................................................................................... 10
3.4 Buffers ............................................................................................................................ 10
4.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REGULATORY FINDINGS ........................................ 13
4.1 Impacts to Wetland Buffer ............................................................................................. 13
4.2 Buffer Enhancement Conceptual Plan ........................................................................... 13
5.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 14
Figures
Figure 1 ~ Location Map
Figure 2 ~ Wetland Delineation Map
Figure 3 ~ NWI Map
Figure 4 ~ NWI VicinityMap
Figure 5 ~ Proposed Site Plan
Appendice .•
Appendix A ~ Soil Survey Report
Appendix B -Wetland Data Sheets
Appendix C -Site Photographs
Appendix D -Wetland Rating Forms
Re·Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
ii
•
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a wetlands delineation conducted by Re-Align Environmental on a
parcel of land along Talbot Road South in Renton, Washington known as Talbot Road South Short Plat
(Parcel #302305-9071 -see Figure I). The project site is located east of Talbot Road in the upper
headwaters of the Black River watershed. During the delineation, no jurisdictional wetlands were found
on the subject parcel, but jurisdictional wetlands were observed on lands immediately adjoining the
property. A formal delineation and rating were completed on October 11,2013.
1.1 Project Background
The subject property is a 1.37acre, single-family residential parcel, including a "pipestem" driveway (see
Figure I). Consequently, the entire site has been either developed or previously landscaped. The existing
house on the site appears to have been abandoned, but is in good structural condition. The properties
immediately east and south of the site contain wetlands that appear to drain around the subject property,
to the west, and into the upper Black River watershed. The property to the north is a developed sub-
division and the property to the west is a residential lot.
Maldiz Investments, LLC has conducted preliminary feasibility studies on the site to evaluate its potential
for a residential sub-division. As a component of these feasibility studies, Re-Align Environmental
conducted a wetland delineation on the site and adjacent parcels.
2.0 METHODS
This section describes the methodology used by Re-Align Environmental to complete the wetlands
delineation and rating.
2.1 Wetland Delineation Protocol
To ensure consistency with Federal, Washington State, and City of Renton regulations, Re-Align
Environmental conducted the delineation on the project site consistent with the methodology outlined in
the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington Manual) (WDOE
1997) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western
Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (Regional Supplement) (USACE 2010), which are consistent with
the Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Corps Manual) (Environmental Laboratory
1987) and other pertinent federal and local guidance. A three parameter approach is used when making
wetland determinations, wherein positive indicators of wetland hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophytic
vegetation all must be present in order to determine that an area is a jurisdictional wetland (WDOE 1997;
ACOE,2010).
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
1
Thc primary objectives of the delineation of wetlands and other Waters of the U.S. perfonned by Re-
Align Environmental include the following:
• Delineate the geographic extent of jurisdictional wetlands and other Waters of the U.S. on and
surrounding the project site using numbered flags.
• Produce an accurate map that depicts the location of the delineated wetlands on and around the
project site.
• Rate the wetlands and determine the appropriate buffers based on the City of Renton Critical
Area Regnlations.
• Assist the engineering team in the design of the proposed development to be consistent with City
of Renton Critical Area Regulations.
2.1.1 Wetland Hydrology Parameter
The presence of wetland hydrology can bc determined using a variety of direct and indirect indicators,
consistent with the Regional Supplement. Direct hydrology indicators, such as stream gauging station
data or historical records, pertaining to the project area can be used to satisfy the wetland hydrology
parameter. The wetland hydrology parameter can also be determined using field indicators, which
include, but are not limited to: visual observation of inundation, high water table or soil saturation,
sediment deposits, water stained leaves, watennarks, oxidized rhizospheres along living roots, drift
deposits, and hydrogen sulfide odor (USACE, 2010; WDOE 1997).
Wetland hydrology must be present during the growing season, which is defined as that portion of the
year when soil temperatures at 19.7 inches (50 em) below the soil surface are higher than biological zero
(41 0 F) (USDA SCS 1991). The wetland hydrology parameter may be met if an area is inundated and/or
saturated to the surface for a total of 5 to 12.5 percent of the growing season (USACE 1987, WDOE
1997). The wetland hydrology parameter is met if an area is inundated or saturated for more than 12.5
percent ofthe growing season.
2.1.2 Hydric Soils Parameter
The USDA, National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils (NTCHS) developed a set of four technical
criteria for identifying hydric soils (sec Table I). Meeting the hydric soils parameter for wetland
determinations requires fulfillment of at least one of the four technical criteria in Table I. Fulfillment of
the hydric soils parameter can also bc satisfied by using published soils infonnation and field indicators.
Field indicators for determining whether a soil meets the hydric soils parameter are listed in Field
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
2
Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA NRCS 2006) and in the Regional Supplement.
Field indicators include, but are not limited to the presence of: a histosol or histic epipedon, hydrogen
sulfide odor, stripped matrix, loamy mucky material, loamy gleyed material, depleted matrix, redox dark
surface, and redox depressions, Published soils information for the project site was obtained from the
NRCS Web Soil Survey program at http://wcbsoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov(AppendixA).Soil colors were
determined in the field using standard NRCS sampling techniques and Munsell Soil Color Charts
(Munsell 2000).
Table 1: Technical Criteria for Identification of Hydric Soils in the United States
I All Histosols except Folists, or
2 Soils in Aquic suborders, great groups, or subgroups, Abolls suborder, Aquisalids, Pachic subgroup, or
Cumulic subgroups that are:
a. Somewhat poorly drained with a water table equal to 0.0 feet from the surface during the growing
season, or
b. Poorly drained or very poorly drained and have either:
(1) A water table at 0.0 feet during the growing season if textures are coarse sand, sand, or fine
sand in all layers within 20 inches; or for other soils
(2) A water table at less than or equal 0.5 feet from the surface during the growing season if
permeability is equal to or greater than 6.0 inches/hour in all layers within 20 inches; or
(3) A water table at less than or equal to 1,0 feet from the surface during the growing season if
permeability is less than 6.0 inches/hour in any layer within 20 inches.
3 Soils that are frequently ponded for long duration or very long duration during the growing season, or
4 Soils that are frequently flooded for long duration or very long duration during the growing season.
Source; USDA and NTCHS 1994
Hydrophvtic Vegetation Parameter
An area meets the hydrophytic vegetation parameter when more than 50% of the dominant species from
each stratum have an assigned indicator status of obligate wetland (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW),
and/or facultative (FAC) , According to the Regional Supplement, an area can meet the hydrophytic
vegetation parameter even when it does not pass the dominance test (described above) if it passes the
prevalence index, a weighted ratio of the total percent cover of all species identified in the area (USACE
2010). The indicator status of each species was assigned using the National List of Plant Species that
Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) (Reed 1988), USACE supplement plant list, the USDA NRCS
Plants Database (http://plants,usda.gov/javainameSearch) and regionally specific plant taxonomy texts
(Pojar and MacKinnon 1994, Guard 1995), An indicator status refers to the relative frequency with which
a particular species occurs in jurisdictional wetlands (see Table 2). Dominant species in each of four strata
(i.e., tree, sapling/shrub, herb, and woody vine) are identified as the most abundant species that,
combined, immediately exceed 50% of the total aerial cover for that stratum, plus any additional species
that comprise 20% or more the total aerial cover for that stratum.
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
3
Table 2: Plant Indicator Status Categories
Indicator Status Definition
Obligate Wetland (OBL) Occur almost always in wetlands under natural conditions (probability >99%).
Facultative Wetland (FACW) Usually occur in wetlands (probability >67% to 99%), but occasionally found
in non-wetlands.
Facultative (FAC) Equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (probability 33% to 67%).
Facultative Upland (FACU) Usually occur in non-wetlands, but occasionally found in wetlands
(probability 1 % to <33%).
Obligate Upland (UPL) Occur rarely in wetlands under natural conditions (probability <I %).
No Indicator Status (NI) Insufficient information exists to assign an indicator status.
Source: USFWS 1988
2.2 Waters of the United States Delineation Protocol
Re-Align Environmental evaluated "other" jurisdictional waters of the United States within the project
area consistent with the definitions provided in 33 CFR 328.3 (a)(I-5). The applicable portions of the
Waters of the U.S. definition arc as follows, "all other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams
(including intermittent streams) ..... the use, degradation, or destruction of which could affect interstate or
foreign commerce ... " and "tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs (a)(I)-(4) of this section" (33
CFR 328.3 [a)[3 and 5)). In applying these definitions to conditions encountered in the project site, Re-
Align Environmental used the following criteria for identifYing waters of the United States: (1) presence
of distinct bed and bank features that have been produced by surface waters, and (2) presence of an
identifiable Ordinary Higb Water mark (OHWM).
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
4
3.0 RESULTS
The following sections present the results of the wetlands delineation. Fieldwork for this delineation was
completed on October 11, 2013. During the fieldwork, conditions were sunny and rain free. During the
ten prior days, the area received 1.26 inches ofrain (http://edo.ncdc.noaa.gov/gc\cdJOCLCD).
3.1 General Site Characteristics
3.1.1 Topography
The majority of the site is gently sloping (less than 5%) and drains to the west, toward Talbot Road S (sec
Figure 2). The driveway contains a steeper pitch, estimated at 12% -15%, near Talbot Road.
3.1.2 Hydrology
The hydrology of the site is primarily derived from rainfall that infiltrates into the groundwater or flows
across the ground surface. Figure 3 depicts the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map for the area
(http://www.fws.gov/wetiandslDatalMappcr.html). The NWI map shows no wetlands on, or surrounding
the property.
Soil information was obtained from the NRCS Web Soil Survey (WSS) program,
(http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov). According to WSS there is one soil unit present on the project site:
• AgC-Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes
Appendix A provides the WSS report for the soils on the site. The following presents a summary of the
soil description for the map units from WSS.
3.1.3.1 AldelWood GravelIy Sandy Loam
Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam is found at elevations ranging from 50 to 800 feet in areas whit a mean
annual precipitation of 25 to 60 inches. The mean annual air temperature ranges from 48 to 52 degrees
Fahrenheit with a frost-free period ranging from 180 to 220 days. Alderwood soils formed on moraines
and till planes from parent material comprised of basal till with some volcanic ash.
The Alderwood C unit (6% -15% slopes) is comprised of 5% other components, including the hydric
Norma, Bellingham Seattle, Tukwila and Shalear Series soils, which are all found in depressions.
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
5
On the subject property, Alderwood soils are present in the upland area. The wetlands along the eastern
and southern property lines have soils that are similar in fonn to the Nanna and Seattle series minor
inclusions (see Appendix A).
Vegetation
The subject property is a residential property. Consequently the majority of the area on the site is
comprised of the house, driveway, scattered trees, shrubs and lawn. The property to the east is depicted
as forested on the NWI map (see Figure 3). However, the area appears to have been logged and the
eastern property contains only scattered trees (see Photo 1). Figure 4 shows the NWI map zoomed out to
show the surrounding vicinity.
Immediately south of the subject property, a utility corridor has been cut through the forest (see Photo 2),
effectively separating the site from the remaining forest on the southern parcel.
Table 3 lists the 22 plant species found on and adjacent to the site.
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised Jannary 2014)
6
a e : T bl 3 PI S ant specIes L' 1st
Common Name Scientific Name Found in Wetland?
Trees/Shrubs
Western Red Cedar Thiuja plicata X
B lack Cotton wood Populus balsamifera X
Oregon Ash Fraxinus latifolia X
Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii
English HoUy I1ex aquifolium
Red Alder Alnus rubra X
Big Leaf Maple Aeer macrophyHum
Snowberry Symphoriearpus albus X
Cascara Rhamus purshiana X
Indian Plum Oemleria cerasiformis X
Red Huckleberry Vaccinium parvifolium X
Himalayan Blackberry Rubus discolor
Salal Gaultheria shaHon
Oregon Grape Mahonia aquiifolium
Herbaceous Plants
English Ivy Hedera helix
Creeping Buttercup Ranunculus repens
Common Rush J uncus effusus X
Sedge Carcx sp. X
Sword Fern Polystichum munitum
Bracken Fern Pteridium aquilinum
Unidentified Grass unknown X
Unidentified Sedge Carex sp. X
Note: Invasive species are bolded
3.2 Wetlands
As shown in Figure 2, no wetlands were found to exist on the subject parcel. Wetlands are present along
the eastern and southern boundaries of the subject property. The wetland boundaries were delineated in
the field according to the approach detailed in Section 2.1 -Wetland Delineation Protocol. The wetland
boundaries were subsequently surveyed. The following presents the results of the field wetland
delineation. Wetland data sheets arc located in Appendix B and Site photographs are located in Appendix
Re·Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
7
C. The wetland has been rated according the Western Washington Wetland Rating Fonn, included in
Appendix D.
The subject wetland is a Category IV (WA Rating, Category 3 under Renton Code) slope wetland. As
described above and shown in Figure 4, this wetland is part of a larger wetlands complex that drains west
toward the Black River. On the eastern side of the subject property, the area appears to have been logged
within the past several years (see Photo I). The area to the south contains forested wetland that appear to
be relatively undisturbed, with the exception of a utility easement that has been cleared and graded
between the subject property and the wetland itself (Photo 2).
Access to the offsite wetlands was not authorized for this field investigation. As a result, flagging was
not completed for the entire wetland along the southern property. Figure 2 depicts the interpolated
wetland boundary based on observations from within the utility easement.
The wetland boundary was delineated primarily based on changes in vegetation and hydrologic indicators.
Six data points were sampled. Data points 1 and 4 describe the conditions immediately inside the wetland
boundary and data points 2, 3,5, and 6 describe the conditions outside ofthe wetland boundary (Appendix
B).
Hydrology in the wetland is provided mainly by precipitation and groundwater flow from upslope.
uplands and wetlands. At flags # 2 -#7 the wetland boundary was most easily defined because the
vegetation in this area had not been cleared during the logging. (see Photos #3 -data point I and #4 -data
point 2). At flags #9 -#12, the wetland has been ditched to convey surface water south and into a ditch
along the existing driveway. At flag #13, the wetland is assumed to continue onto the southern, adjacent
property, where the wetland boundary was partially flagged based on topography and vegetation. No data
points were established in the southern property because access was not authorized.
Mapped soil within the wetlands is Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes, which also
contains hydric inclusions. Field investigations of soil pits offsite to the east indicated a fairly consistent
Munsell soil color, with all soil horizons exhibiting a low-chroma, depleted matrix and occasional
oxidized rhizosphercs with living roots.
Hydrophytic vegetation was present in wetland data plots. The dominant species at the time of delineation
include Oregon ash, Western red cedar, and black cottonwood in the woody strata. The shrub layer,
where present, includes Oregon Ash, with occasional cascara and snowberry. Herbaceous species are
dominated by creeping buttercup and an unidentified grass, with occasional soft rush and an unidentified
sedge.
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
8
Despite over an inch of rain in the preceding ten days, no direct evidence of wetland hydrology (e.g. high
water table, saturation) was present during the fieldwork. Oxidized rhizospheres with living roots were
observed in the wetland data plots and the wetland along flags #2 -#7 shows a wetland drainage pattern
that leads to the ditch at flag #8.
Datapoint #5 describes a depressional area along the western property line. This area did not meet the
vegetation or hydrology parameters and the soil was marginally not hydric (chroma 2 with no other
indicators).
The wetland data points meet all three wetland parameters -hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil, and
wetland hydrology -and therefore are located in wetlands. The upland data points generally did not meet
any of the parameters.
Wetland Rating
Appendix D contains the Western Washington Wetland Rating form that was prepared for the wetlands
on the subject property.
The classification of the wetland is "Slope" because the wetland meets all of the criteria for a Slope
wetland, as shown in in Table 5.
a e : as m~lOn e an a mg orm-T hI 5 W h' t W tl d R f F CI 'fi Ii aSSI lea on as SI ope e an Wild
Classification Criteria Rationale
1.) The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very The wetland slopes at approximately 2 -3%, draining to the
gradual). south and west (see Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2).
2.) The water flows through the wetland in one The wetland flows south and west away from the site, via
direction (unidirectional) and usually comes natural wetland drainage patterns and man-made ditching.
from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as
sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks.
3.) The water leaves the wetland without being The wetland slopes downhill to the west with no evidence of
impounded. impoundment.
3.2.1.1 Water Quality Functions
The wetland has a low potential to improve water quality. The slope of the wetland is approximately 2 -
5% (S 1.1 score of I) and the soil in the central portion of the wetland is not organic below the surface (H
1.2 score of 0). The wetland exhibits dense, uncut herbaceous vegetation over approximately 50% of the
wetland as a result of the historic logging on the eastern parcel (H 1.3 score of 2). The opportunity to
improve water quality is high due to the presence of adjacent residential development (S 2 score of 2).
Consequently, tbe water quality score of the wetland is 6.
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S, Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
9
3.2.1.2 Hydrologic Functions
The hydrologic function of the wetland is limited by its extensive herbaceous vegetation on the logged,
eastern parcel, which limits rigid stems to less than half of the wetland (S 3.1 score of 3) and a lack of
depressions that can retain water (H 3.2 score of 0). The wetland does not have the opportunity to reduce
flooding (S 4 score of 1), for a Hydrologic function score of3.
3.2.1.3 Habitat Function
The habitat does include a canopy with over 30% cover in the southern parcel, and the eastern parcel does
have sparse emergent species (e.g. Carex, soft rush). The wetland also has canopy, shrub and herbaceous
laycrs, (H 1.1 score of 2) and species richness is low, with 12 spccies found in the wetlands (H 1.3 score
of I -see Table 3). The hydroperiod of the wetland include only saturation, as no indication of actual
flooding or inundation is evident (H 1.2 score of I).
The interspersion of habitats in the wetland is low (H 1.4 score of I). The Special Habitat Features of thc
wetland are low, benefitting only from a low percentage cover of invasive species (H 1.5 score of I).
The opportunity to provide habitat functions is limited by the residential development and historic
logging surrounding the wetlands. The buffers of the wetland contain paved areas and buildings (H 2.1
score of I) and the wetland is not part of any relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor.
(see Figures 3 and 4 - H 2.2 score of 0). The wetland area is not ncar or adjacent to any priority habitats
(H 2.3 score of 0) and there are at least one wetland within a half-mile (H 2.4 score of 2). In total, the
habitat score for this wetland complex is 8 (See Appendix D).
3.2.1.4 Score and Category
With a Water Quality score of 6, a Hydrologic score of 3, and a Habitat score of 8, this wetland totals a
score of 17, placing it at the lower end ofa Category IV (score range <30).
3.3 Streams
No streams were found on, or adjacent to the subject property.
3.4 Buffers
The Renton Critical Areas Ordinance provides guidance on the classification of wetlands:
a. Classification System: The following classification system is hereby adopted for the purposes of regulating
wetlands in the City. Wetlands buffer widths, replacement ratios and avoidance criteria shall be based on the
following rating system:
Re·Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
10
i. Category 1: Category 1 wetlands are wetlands lvhich meet one or more of the following criteria:
(a) The presence of species listed by Federal or State government as endangered or threatened, or
the presence of essential habitat for those species: andlor
(b) Wetlands having forty percent (40%) to sixty percent (60%) permanent open water (in
dispersed patches or otherwise) with tvvo (2) or more vegetation classes; and/or
(c) Wetland, equal to or greater than ten (/0) acres in size and having three (3) or more
vegetation classes, one of which is open water; and/or (d) The presence of plant associations of
infrequent occurrence; or at the geographic limits of their occurrence; and/or
ii. Category 2: Category 2 wetlands are wetland~ which meet one or more of the following criteria:
(a) Wetlands that are not Category 1 or 3 wetlands; andlor
(b) Wetlands that have heron rookeries or osprey nests, but are not Category 1 wetlands; andlor
(c) Wetlands of any size located at the headwaters of a watercourse, i.e. a wetland with a
perennial or seasonal outflow channel, but with no defined influent channel, but are not Category
1 wetlands; and lor
(d) Wetlands having minimum existing evidence of human related physical alteration such as
diking, ditching or channelization: andlor
iii. Category 3: Category 3 wetlands are wetlands which meet one or more of the following criteria:
(a) Wetlands that are severely disturbed. Severely disturbed wetlands are wetlands which meet the
following criteria:
(i) Are characterized by hydrologic isolation, human-related hydrologic alterations such
as diking, ditching, channelization and/or outlet modification; and
(ii) llave soils alterations such as the presence of fill, soil removal and/or compaction of
soils: and
(iii) May have altered vegetation.
(b) Wetlands that are newly emerging. Newly emerging wetlands are:
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
(i) Wetlands occurring on top offill materials: and
Talbot Road S. Sbort Plat -Renton, Wasbington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
11
(ii) Characterized by emergent vegetation, low plant species richness and used minimally
by wildlife. These wetland, are generally found in the areas such as the Green River
Valley and Black River Drainage Basin.
(c) All other wetlands not classified as Category 1 or 2 such as smaller, high quality wetlands.
The wetlands surrounding the subject property have been subject to disturbance, including removal of
vegetation, ditching, and the installation of utilities. As a result, the Renton Code designates these
wetlands as Category 3.
The Renton Code provides standard buffer widths for wetlands, as shown in in Table 6.
Table 6' Standard Wetland Buffer .
Wetland Category Standard Buffer
Category 1 100 feet
Category 2 50 feet
Category 3 25 feet
The standard buffer widths are assigned to wetlands when the applicant demonstrates in a wetland
assessment report that four criteria are not met. The criteria and their rationale for not being met on the
subject property are provided in Table 7. The assigned buffer width is 25 feet.
Table 7' Increased Wetland Buffer Criteria .
Criterion
i. The wetland is used by species listed by the Federal or the
State government as threatened, endangered and sensitive
species and State-listed priority species, essential habitat for
those species or has unusual nesting or resting sites such as
heron rookeries or rantor nestin!! trees or evidence thereof; or
ii. The subject property, or nearby lands to which the subject
property drains in route to a wetland are susceptible to severe
erosion, and erosion control measures will not effectively
prevent adverse wetland impacts; or
iii. The subject property, or nearby lands to which the subject
property drains in route to a wetland have minimal vegetative
cover or slopes greater than fifteen percent (15%) and
conditions cannot be restored to prevent ad verse wetland
impacts; or
iv, Wetland dependent wildlife species are observed to be
present in the wetland, and may require larger buffers based
!mon the evaluation in subsection v.
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
Met? Rationale
No No listed species occupy the site and
no nesting sites are present on the site.
No The site does not contain and erosion
hazard areas.
No The subj ect property does contain a
slope of approximately 15% (i.e., thc
existing driveway). However, this
portion of the site is not proximate to
any wetland and it drains to an
existing ditch and pipe system
associated with Talbot Road S.
No No wetland dependent species have
been observed in the wetlands
surrounding the subj ect property.
12
4.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REGULATORY FINDINGS
4.1 Impacts to Wetland Buffer
The existing condition of the wetlands adjacent to the project site is relatively disturbed, as demonstrated
by the low rating score (see Section 3.2.1). In addition, the wetland buffer is almost entirely in a
disturbed condition, due the existing single-family residential development on the subject property, the
logging of the site to the east, and the installation of a utility corridor along the southern property line.
Figure 5 shows the proposed development plan, the wetland boundary, and the standard 25-foot wetland
buffer. The wetland buffer exists on the subject property in the southeast comer of the site, on the
proposed Lots 4 and 5. The wetland buffer is present in the very rear of these two lots. The proposed
development will have no effect on the wetland buffers through construction of the residences or
infrastructure. However, as a component of the development, the wetland buffer will be improved
through the removal of buildings and preservation of the wetland buffer, as described below.
4.2 Buffer Enhancement Conceptual Plan
The buffer enhancement plan for the Talbot Road development will include the following goals and
objectives:
Goall -Restore buffer function and habitat complexity
Objective A: Remove structures from buffer area.
Performance Standard: Removal of existing building and driveway from the wetland buffer
area. Stabilize and re-vegetate the buffer.
Evaluation Method: Photo-documentation before and after structure removal, site
stabilization, and re-vegetationo.
Goal 2 -Preserve wetland buffer
Objective A: Designate and sign the boundary the wetland buffer as a Wetland/Sensitive Area.
Performance Standard: A 4-foot tall, wildlife passable fence (e.g., wood rail fence) is
installed along the wetland buffer boundary and wetland/sensitive area signs are installed on
the fence every 50 to 150 feet.
Evaluation Method: Sign inspection by engineer following installation and/or by the
project wetland ecologist during the monitoring period
Re·Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S. Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
13
S.O REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Technical Report Y-87-J -Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual. United States Anny Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS.
Guard, J. 1995. Wetland Plants of Oregon and Washington. Lone Pinc Publishing Company.
Vancouver, BC.
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoiISurvey.aspx -accessed on 111512013.
Munsell Color. 2000. Munsell Soil Color Charts. GretagMacbeth. New Widsor, NY.
NOAA, Quality Controlled Local Climatological Data (QCLCD),
(,http://cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/gclcd/OCLCD -accessed 1115/13.
Pojar, J and A. MacKinnon. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Lone Pine Publishing
Company. Vancouver, BC.
Reed, P. B. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). U. S.
Government Printing Office.
US ACE. 1991. Questions and Answers on the Washington Manual. Memorandum 10-91.
USACE.2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western
Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region.
U. S. Dcpartment of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
(http://plants. usda. gov Ij a vainamcSearch)
u. S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Field Indicators of
Hydric Soils in the United States. USDA, NRCS, Fort Worth, TX.
Washington Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation
Manual.
Re-Align Environmental
Wetlands Report
Talbot Road S, Short Plat -Renton, Washington
November, 2013 (Revised January 2014)
14
Figures
Ib Itt ~(
..
$1/ 27TH
II<
ST
~
> ~ ...
w
> c
SI/ 34TH ST
'" 5
SI/ 41ST ST
£ 43RD $T
(S lSOTH
WW
\'V U1
N
Not to Scale
Re-Align Environmental
Sf;
3LST
ST
SE 176TH ST
W
'"
III > oCt
Figure 1
Location Map
Talbot Road S. Short Plat
DATUM:
NAVD 88 ~
BENCHMARK:
ORIGINAL BM: 3" DOMED BRASS DISK till
SURFACE MON STAMPED 1.1
I! I 'KC SURVEY MON KC-F10 I
.' 1993' IN BACK CONC , I ~,~~.~~. I
\
\ .
I
AKA. WCCS 10 /I F10
ELEV. -121.29'
I TBM -A: SET HUB + TACK
ELEV. = 154.98' I
I TBM -B: SET HUB + TACK SCAL.E= r-60' !
\
' ELEV. ... 1, 73.51' I· f
, . __ , _____ • ____________ . _______ . ___ __ _ J
---
~.=~~~ ........
I
I
I , ,
!
I
I ~f , ,
--- -
~ "l>,
~ ....
\
\
I
I
1 r-----= ~ = ~. ------- --=----"'--",,' ~---. ~ ~--~~~ -'.
~--'-..,-~ ".. . ~
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
SURVEYED
1
\
\
I
I
I
\ \
Figure 2
Wetland Delineation Survey
Talbot Road S. Short Plat
Re-Align Environmental
'rt£1lAND
BOUNDARY
IN7ERPOLA TED
WETLAND MAP
iElI ~ -i5ill'iiilil
SURI£YQRi
TYEE SURVEYORS
10007 GREENWOOD A VENUE NORTH
SEATTLE:, WA 98133
TIMOTHY GRIFFIN
PHONE: (206) 525-3660
FAX: (206) 525-0334
Re-Align Environmental
N Figure 3
NWIMap
Talbot Road S. Short Plat
N
Re -Align
Environm ental
Figure 4
NWI Vicinity Map
Talbot Road S. Short Plat
\ \ \ BENCHMARK:
ORIGINAL BM: 3" DOMED BRASS DISK , , SURFACE MON STAMPED , I , 'KC SURVEY MON KC-F10
1993' IN BACK CONC
\ \ \
WALK, NW QUAD •. OF INTX.
TALBOT ROAD AND CARR.
CUlM TASI.EAKA. WCCS ID II F10
ldJiKU I R I [ rtBIJfiU 121.29' " . , 'i1! I \~; \ \
II, t I
I \
I
\
\ ..... ~
....... '\" \ ...... . r 1\
TBM
TBM ~~N~~~~ET H~j + TACK
REAR YARD SET BAa< ~1:llfV = 173 51'
SIDE YARD SET BACK --y" .
WEn.ANO BUFFER SE1BACK 11)'
~J,'~"'" 1'0-23-5-51000
Ii, \ ;~ 1 ~.-.=-~~-
Figure 5
Proposed Site Plan
Talbot Road S. Short Plat
Re-Align Environmental
! ~
GRAPHIC SCALE
SCALE: r-60'
--
b • LOT 2
.L I)' S.Y. SEIlWlK(IYP.)
~~:: t-j 31 --
8591 !iF. ..: _SF.
n
lOT 1
5753 !iF.
JOINT USE OW'f. .. I I :
UllL ESIIT.
2533 !iF.
_15' F.Y. ~" ~5a..---=l r-20' R.Y. SEIBACK(IYP.)
I ~_,
LOT4 JJie L 308SF.. ~ tJj;
~ ~~( ~ '-r--~~ BOUNIlW
LOT I) ,
8475 !iF. ce
,
WIDE CONe. SlDEWAIJ<
I
I
I
"...--"
QWNERSIPEVELOPERS;
MALDIZ INVESTMENTS, LLC.
1509 N 80TH ST
SEA TILE, WA 98103
PHONE: (206) 683-8821
WEIlAND BOUNIlW INTERPOlATED
WEIlAND BUFFER INIERPOIATED
CIVIL ENGINEER:
PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN, LLC
15445 53RO AVES.
SEA TILE, WA 98188
GREG DIENER
PHONE: (206) 431-7970
FAX: (206) 388-1648
WETLAND BUFFER MAP
~LNlDSCAPE ARFA
SURVEYOR:
TYEE SURVEYORS
10007 GREENWOOD AVENUE NORTH
SEA TTLE, WA 98133
llMOTHY GRIFFIN
PHONE: (206) 525-3660
FAX: (206) 525-0334
Appendix A
Soil Survey Report
United States
Department of
Agriculture
~ NRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies includin g the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, an d local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
King County
Area,
Washington
October 31,2013
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide infonmation about
the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many
different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners,
community Officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local govemments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identifY soil properties
that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the land users identifY and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
v.arious land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifYing and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey infonmation can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases.
Examples include soil quality assessments (http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/) and certain
conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed infonmation, contact
your local USDA Service Center (http://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?
agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://soils.usda.gov/contact/
state_offices!).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey orwet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil
Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated infonmation is available
through the NRCS Soil Data Mart Web site or the NRCS Web Soil Survey. The Soil
Data Mart is the data storage site for the official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic infonTIation, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an
individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
2
for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TOO). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue, S. w., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272
(voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TOO). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.
3
Contents
*;;11
Preface .................................................................................................................... 2
Soil Map .................................................................................................................. 5
~~p ............................................................................................................... B
Legend .................................................................................................................. 7
Map Unit Legend .................................................................................................. 8
Map Unit Descriptions .......................................................................................... 8
King County Area, Washington ....................................................................... 10
AgC-Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes ................... 1 0
References ............................................................................................................ 12
4
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
5
\ ,
• Cu stom Soil Reso urce Report • ~ Soil Map ~
~ ~
§ U
55_ 559<80 559500 559520 559"" 5S9 S60 55')'"""'" 559000 SS962lJ 5596<0 5S96IiO 5S9680 559700 " 47" 21'l "N I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1::1 47" 27'1"N
Gl
~ ~
I
5l
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
Gl
5l :::
4'" 1f15S"N t t t ~ 47" 26'SS"N
559<60 559<80 5S9S00 5SOS2O SS9S4O 5S9S60 5S9580 """" SS9620 SS9S4O 5S9E60 5S9680 SS9700
• • ~ Map Scale: 1:1,160 if pri1ted on A larrlscape (lr x 8.5") sheet. ~
~ ~
a N """'" ~ 0 15 30 GO 90
A Feet
0 so 100 200 300
Map JrojE:dia1: Web Mert:abr Canercoordinates: WGS84 Edgcli:s: UTM Zone iON WGS84
6
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AD)
[J Area of Interest (ADI)
Soils
[J Soil Map Unit Polygons -1:1
80'11 Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
121 Blowout
® Borrow Pit
)( Clay Spot
0 Closed Depression
~ Gravel Pit . Gravelly Spot ..
~ Landfill
• ,,-Lava Flow
c:b. Marsh or swamp
*" Mine or Quarry
@ Miscellaneous Water
~ Perennial Water
V Rock Outcrop
+ Saline Spot
o • Sandy Spot
"'" Severely Eroded Spot
4j Sinkhole
~ ..... Slide or Slip
f!! Sadie Spot
= Spoil Area .=
,J Stony Spot
~ Very Stony spot
1\' Wet Spot
6 Other . -Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
H-t
......
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
• Aerial Photography
7
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your ADI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale .
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the. Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used If more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area:
Survey Puea Data:
King County Area, Washington
Version 7, Jul2, 2012
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1 :50,000
or larger.
Oate(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 9, 2010-Aug 20,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
King County Area, Washington (WA633)
Map Unit Symbol I Map Unit Name Acres InADI Percent of AOI
Age I A1derwood gravelly sandy loam, 4.6
6 to 15 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 4.6
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits forthe properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the rallge of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up ofthe soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not'affect use' and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They mayor may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, Gomponents. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each.A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was 50 complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in-a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The. objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
intensive use of small areas is planned, nowever, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and,miscellaneous areas.
8
100.0%
100.0%
Custom Soil Resource Report
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture ofthe surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattem or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
antiCipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. .
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
King County Area, Washington
AgC-Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Selling
Elevation: 50 to 800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 180 to 220 days
Map Unit Composition
Alderwood and similar soils: 95 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Description of Alderwood
Setting
Landform: Moraines, till plains
Parent material: Basal till with some volcanic ash
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 24 to 40 inches to densic material
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 37 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Very low (about 2.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
o to 12 inches: Gravelly ashy sandy loam
12 to 27 inches: Very gravelly sandy loam
27 to 60 inches: Very gravelly sandy loam
Minor Components
Norma
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Depressions
Bellingham
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Depressions
Seallie
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Depressions
Tukwila
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
10
Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Depressions
Shalcar
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Depressions
11
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and
testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13,1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, GW., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils
in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S.
Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://soils.usda.gov/
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making
and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://soils.usda.gov/
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://soils.usda.gov/
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://soils.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.glti.nrcs.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://soils.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the
Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http://soils.usda.gov/
12
Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210.
13
Appendix B
Wetland Data Sheets
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region
Project Site:
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator(s):
Talbot Road Short Plat
Maldiz Investments
Bill Granger
City/County: Renton! Sampling Date:
State: WA Sampling Point: 1
Section, Township, Range: 522 T23 N R5E
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): !l..Q!l§;
Subregion (LRR): t. Lat: 47" 26' 58" N Long: 122~ 12' 30w W
Soi! Map Unit Name: Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam 6%·15% Slopes NWI classification:
Slope (%): 3 -5%
Datum: WGS84
PF01A
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No o (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation D, Soil D. Or Hydrology D. significantly disturbed? Are ~Nonnar Circumstances" present? Yes I8J No 0
Are Vegetation 0. Soil 0. Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach sile map showing sampling poinl localions, transects, Importanl fealures, elc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 181 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 181 No 0 Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Yes tEl No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 No 0
Remarks: WeUand area located east of property line, just east of driveway and south of shed.
VEGETATiON -Use scienlific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30') Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: % Cover Species? Status
1. Thuia olicata <!! Y§ FAG Number of Dominant Species That Are
2. Populus balsamifera <!! FAG OBl, FACW, or FAG: 1 (A)
Y§
3. --------Total Number of Dominant Species Across l! (B)
4. All Strata: --------
50% = 20, 20% = § 40 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 20') OBL, FACW, or FAC: §Q (NB)
1. Fraxinus latifo/ia 10 Y§ FACW Prevalence Index worksheet:
2. Franqu/a ourshiana 10 Y§ FAG Total % Cover of: Multiply: by:
3. Sl£.ml2.horicamus a/bus l! !!Q FAGU OBl species Q x1 = Q
4. Rubus discolor l! no FAGU FAGW species 10 ><2= <!!
5. -- ------FAG species 50 x3= 150
50%= 15, 20% =§ ;lQ = Total Cover FAGU species Q )(4 = Q
Herb Stratum (Plot Size: -l UPl species QQ x5 = Q
1. Hedera he/be ;lQ Y§ !!! Column Totals: 60 (A) 170 (B)
2. Ranuncu/us repens l! !!Q FAG Prevalence Index = BfA = 2.83
3. unidentified graSS l! !!Q !!! Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4. --------181 Dominance Test is >50%
5. ------ --
181 Prevalence Index is ~3.01
6. -- --
-- --0 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in
7. ------ --
Remarks or on a separate sheet)
8. ------ --
0 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants'
9. --------0 Problematic Hydrop~ytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
10. ------ --
11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. --------unless disturbed or problematic.
50% = 2Q, 20% =§ 40 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: __ I
1. --------Hydrophytlc
2. ------ --
Vegetation Yes 181 No D
50% = __ , 20% = __ = Total Cover Present? --
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum
Remarks: Parameter met based on PI and dominance.
US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast -Interim Version
Project Site: Talbot Road Short Plat
SOIL Sampling Point: 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) I
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type l Loc2 Texture Remarks ---------
0-6 10YR 2/2 100 --------silt loam --
6 -16 10 YR 2/2 ill! 10YR 4/6 30 .Q M silt loam --
-- --
--10YR 211 1Q Q M slit loam occasional ORCs
------------------
------------------
---------- --------
------------------
------ ------------
l Type : C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: Pl=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to alllRRs, unless otherwise noted,) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
0 Histosol (A 1) 0 Sandy Redox (S5) 0 2 cm Muck (A10)
0 Histic Epipedon (A2) 0 Stripped Matrix (56) 0 Red Parent Material (TF2)
0 Black Histic (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MlRA 1) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Depleted 8elow Dark Surface (All) 121 Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Thick Dark Surface (A 12) 0 Redox Dark Surface (F6)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) 0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54) 0 Redox Depressions (FB)
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Restricilv8 Layer (if present):
Type: --
Depth (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes 121 No 0
Remarks: parameter met
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary I ndicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
0 Surface Water (A1) 0 Water-Stained Leaves (89) 0 Water-Stained Leaves (89)
0 High Waler Table (A2) (except MlRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) IMLRA I, 2, 4A, and 4B)
0 Saluration (A3) 0 Salt Crust (B11) 121 Drainage Patterns (810)
0 Water Marks (81) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates (813) 0 Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (82) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
0 Drift Deposits (B3) 121 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Rools (C3) 0 Geomorphic Position (02)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (84) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Shallow Aquitard (03)
0 Iron Deposits (85) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CG) 0 FAG-Neutral Test (D5)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 0 Stunted or Stresses Plants (Dl) (LRR A) 0 Raised Ant Mounds (06) (lRR A)
0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? . Yes 0 No 121 Depth (inches): --
Water TabJe Present? Ves 0 No 121 Depth (inches): --
Saturation Present? Yes 0 No 181 Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Ves 121 ~!o 0 (includes capillary fringe) --
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: none
Remarks: South of this wetland, the geound ha been ditched to convey surface water to the south,
US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast -Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region
Project Site:
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator(s):
Talbot Road Short Plat
Maldiz Investments
Bill Granger
City/County: Rentonl Sampling Date:
State: WA Sampling Point:
Section, Township, Range: 822 T23 N RSE
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ~ Local relief (concave, convex, none): I!QD..e.
Subregion (LRB): ~ Lal: 4r 26' 58" N Long: 1220 12' 30" W
Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam 6% • 15% Slopes NWI classification:
Slope (%): 3 -5%
Datum: WGS84
PF01A
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No o (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances· present? Yes [8J No 0
AreVegelation D, Soil D. Or Hydrology 0, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain Bny answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects important features etc , ,
Hydrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No Il!I
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Il!I Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Ves 0 No Il!I
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No Il!I
Remarks: Upland data point outside of wetland area located east of property Une, Justeast of driveway and south of shed.
V GETATION U E -·11 se sc entl I I e names or plan s
Tree Stralum (Plot Size: 30') Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: ~ Species? Status
1. A/nus rubra ~ ~ FAC Number of Dominant Spedes That Are
2. PseudotsllSl8 menziezii .1.Q FACU OBL. FACW. or FAG: 1 (A)
~
3. --------Total Number of Dominant Species Across
4. All Strata: ~ (8)
--------
50% = .1§. 20% = § ;ill = Total Cover Percenl of Dominant Species That Are
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 20') OBL, FACW, or FAG: 11 (NB)
1. Mahon;a aquifolium .1.Q ~ .Ee&k! Prevalence Index worksheet:
2. Gaultheria shaffon .1.Q ~ .Ee&k! Total % GgV!il( Qf' MultiQI~ b~:
3. Vaccinium l2arvlfolium .1.Q ~ FACU OBL species Q x1 = Q
4. /lex agpifolium § ~ NL fUPL) FACW species Q x2= Q
5. Pseudotsuga menzlezll § ~ FACU FAC species ~ x3 = 60
50% = gQ, 20% = !i 19. = Total Cover FAGU speci~s 60 x4= 240
Herb Stratum (Plat Size: ~ UPL species 45 xS = 225
1. Pollf,stiQb.lJ.m munitum <Q ~ FACU Column Totals: 125 (A) 525 (B)
2. Hetera helix 19. ~ NL(UPL) Prevalence Index = BfA = 4.17
3. pteridium aquilinuim § !!Q .Ee&k! Hydrophytic VegetaUon Indicators:
4. --------0 Dominance Test Is >50%
5. --------0 Prevalence I ndex is ~3.0 1
6. --------0 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data In
7. --------Remarks or on a separate sheet)
B. ------ --
0 Wetland NonNascular Plants'
9. --------0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
10. --------
11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
--------unless disturbed or problematic.
50% = 32.5, 20% = .11 g; = Total Cover
Woody Vi@ Stratum (Plot Size: __ I
1. --------Hydrophytlc
2. ----Vegetation Ves 0 No 181 ----
50% = __ , 20% = __ --= Total Cover Present?
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum
Remarks: Parameter is not met based on PI and dominance.
US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version
Project Site: Talbot Road Short Plat
SOIL Sampling Point" 2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) I
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' Lac' Texture Remarks --- ------
0-6 10YR4/4 100 silt loam -------- --
6 -16 10YR 3/4 100 --------silt loam --
---- --------------
---- ------ -- ---- --
---------- ---- -- --
---------------- --
---------------- --
-- -- --
------------
'Type: C= Concentration, D=Depleiion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Locat ion: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soli Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
0 Histosol (A 1) 0 Sandy Redox (55) 0 2 cm Muck (A10)
0 Histic Epipedon (A2) 0 Stripped Matrix (56) 0 Red Parent Material [TF2)
0 Black Histic (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) 0 other (Explain in Remarks)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (M) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2l
0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Thick Dark Surface (A 12) 0 Redox Dark Surface (F6)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) 0 Redox Depressions (Fa)
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
oroblematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type: --
Depth (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks: parameter is not met
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
0 Surface Water (A 1) 0 Water..stalned Leaves (89) 0 Water-Stained Leaves (89)
0 High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1,2, 4A. and 48) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B)
0 Saturation (A3) 0 Salt Crust (B11) 0 Drainage Patterns (810)
0 Water Marks (81) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates (813) 0 Dry-Season Water Table (C2l
0 Sediment Deposits (82) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) 0 Saluration Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Drift Deposits (83) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) 0 Geomorphic Position (02)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (84) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Shallow Aquitard (03)
0 Iron Deposits (85) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) 0 FAG-Neutral Test (05)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (B6) 0 Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) 0 Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A)
0 Inundation VisIble on Aerial Imagery (87) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks (07)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): --
Waler Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): --
Saturation Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0 (includes capillary fringe) --
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), If available: none
Remarks.' parameter is not met
US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast -Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region
Project Site: Talbot Road Short Plat City/County: Rentonl Sampling Date: 10-11-13
ApplicantiOwner: Maldiz Investments State: WA Sampling Point ~
Investigator(s): Bill Granger Section, Township, Range: 522 T23 N R5E
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope
Subregion (LRR): 8. Lat: 4 r 26' 58" N
Soil Map Unit Name: AJderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam 6% -15% Slopes
Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Long: 122° 12' 30" W
NWI classification:
Slope (%): 3 -5%
Datum: WGS84
PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No D (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation D. Soil D. Or Hydrology D, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstancesft present? Yes ell No 0
Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology 0, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc , , ,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No [!;j
Hydric Soil Present? Ves ell No 0 Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Vas 0 No ell
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No [!;j
Remarks: Upland data point outside of wetland area located east of property line, just east of driveway, south of DP 1 and DP2 -along ditch that drains the wetland
from the north in cleared area
VEGETATION -Use scientific names of Diants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size: __ I Absolute Dorninant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: % Cover ~ ~
1. --------Number of Dominant SpeCies That Are
2. OBl, FACW, or FAC: 1 (AI --------
3. --------Total Number of Dominant Species Across
4. All Strata: ~ (8)
--------
50% = __ , 20% = __ --= Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are
Saaling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 20') 08L, FAGW, or FAG: 33 (NBI
1. Oemferia cerasifomnis § """ FACU Prevalence Index worksheet:
2. Rubus discolo" 1Q """ f.ilgj Total :Y~ Qover of: Myltl!ll:£b~f
3. -- ------OBl species Q x1 = Q
4. --------FACW species Q x2= Q
5. --------FAC species £! x3 = 120
50% = 12.5, 20% =.§. <Q = Total Cover FACU species <Q x4 = 100
Herb Stratum (Plot Size: W UPL species Q x5 = Q
1. Ranunculus rel2.ens £! """ FAG Column Totals: 65 (AI 220 (BI
2. unidentified gras§ § J1Q ill Prevalence Index = BJA = 3.38
3. --------HydrophyUc Vegetation Indicators:
4. --------0 Dominance Test is >50%
5. --------0 Prevalence Index is ~3.01
6. --------Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in
7. 0 Remarks or on a separate sheet) --------
8. --------0 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1
9. --------0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
10. --------
11. 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, --------unless disturbed or problematic.
50% = ru. 20% = 2 :l!i = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: __ )
1. --------Hydrophytlc
2. --------Vegetation Yes 0 No 181
50%= ,20%= = Total Cover Present? ---- --
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum --
Remarks: Parameter is not met based on PI and dominance.
US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version
Project Site: Talbot Road Short Plat
SOIL Sampling Point 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) I
Depth Matrix Redox Feo.tures
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' locL Texture Remarks ---------
0·18 1 OYR 2/1 -2/2 100 --------siltloam some Q[§V!:l:i
-- -- --------------
------------------
-- --
--------------
-- --
-------- -- --
--
-- --
--------------
------------ -- --
--
-------- -- -- ------
'Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Mabix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric 5011 Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3
:
0 Histosol (A 1) 0 Sandy Redox (S5) 0 2 em Muck (A10)
0 Histic Epipedon (A2) 0 Stripped Matrix (S6) 0 Red Parent Material (TF2)
0 Black Histic (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Depleted 8elow Dark Surface (A 11) I8l Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Thick Dark Surface (A 12) 0 Redox Dark Surface (FS)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54) 0 Redox Depressions (F8)
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
Droblematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type: --
Depth (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes I8l No 0
Remarks: parameter is marginally me based on colort
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
PrimalY Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
0 Surface Water (A 1) 0 Water-Stained Leaves (89) 0 Water-stained Leaves (89)
0 High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48)
0 Saturation (A3) 0 Salt Crust (811) 0 Drainage Patterns (810)
0 Water Marks (81) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) 0 Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (82) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Drift Deposits (83) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (84) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Shallow Aqui1ard (D3)
0 Iron Deposits (85) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) 0 FAC-Neutral Test (05)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (86) 0 Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (lRR A) 0 Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (lRR A)
0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks (O7)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Ye, 0 No I8l Depth (inches): --
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No I8l Oepth (inches); --
Saturation Present? Yes 0 No I8l Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye, 0 No I8l (includes capillary fringe) --
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: none
Remarks: parameter is not met
US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast -Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region
Project Site:
ApplicanVOwner:
Investigator(s):
Talbot Road Short Plat
Maldiz Investments
Bill Granger
City/County: Renton! Sampling Date:
State: WA Sampling Point
Section, Township, Range: 822 T23 N R5E
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): llQ!l§
Subregion (LRR): ~ Lat: 47" 26' 58" N Long: 122'12' 30' W
Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood Grave!1y Sandy Loam 6% -15% Slopes NWI classification:
Slope (%): 3 -5%
Datum: WGS84
PF01A
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No o (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D. significantly disturbed? Are "Normal CircumstancesM present? Yes 121 No 0
Are Vegetation D, Soil D. Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc , , ,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 121 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 121 No 0 Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Yes 121 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes lSI No 0
Remarks: Wetland data point east of property line in cleared area, east of CP3
V ETATI N U EG 0 -'fi f I se sClentl IC names or plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30') Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: % Cover Species? Status
1. Eraxinus fatifo/ia <!! ""'-FACW Number of Dominant Species Tha! Are
Thuia /2ficata § FAG OSL, FACW, or FAC: ~ (A)
2. ""'-
3. --------Total Number of Dominant Species Across
All Strata: § (B)
4. --------
50% = ill, 20% = § 25 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 20') OBl, FACW, or FAC: §Q (AlB)
1. Fraxinus iatifofia .1§ ""'-FACW Prevalence Index worksheet:
2. Oem/eria cerasiformis § ""'-FACU Total ?a! Cover of: MUltiQI::ib::i;
3. Sym/2horicarpus a/bus 10 ""'-FACU DBl species Q x1 = Q
4. --------FACW species 1Q x2~ !ill
5. --------FAC species f§ x3 = I§
50%= 15, 20% =§ .:lQ = Total Cover FACU spedes <!! x4 = !ill
Herb Stratum (Plot Size: W UPl species Q x5 = Q
1. Ranunculus renens <!! ""'-FAG Column Totals: 85 (A) 235 (B)
2. Juncus effusus § DQ FAGW Prevalence Index = BlA = 2.76
3. unidentified Carex s/2. § DQ FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4. unidentified grass 1Q ""'-ill 0 Dominance Tast is >50%
5. --------121 Prevalence Index is ::.3.01
6. --------0 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in
7. ------ --
Remarks or on a separate sheet)
8. --------0 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1
9. --------0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
10. --------
11. 1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, --------unless disturbed or problematic,
50% .= gQ, 20% = §. 1Q = Total Cover
Wood::i Vine Stratum {Plot Size: -----.J
1. --------Hydrophytic
2. --------Vegetation Yes 121 No 0
50% = __ , 20% = __ = Total Cover Present? --
% Sare Ground In Herb Stratum
Remarks: Parameter is met based on PI, Carex is assumed to be at least FAC, Grass was not assumed to have any ststus and not used in PI.
US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version
Project Site: -Talbol Road Short Plat
SOIL Sampling Point: 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) I
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks --- ------
0-18 10YR 2/1 100 siJtloam few ORCs --------
------ -- --
--------
------ -- -- -- -- ----
------ -- -- -- -- ----
-------- -- -- ------
-------- --
---- ----
-------------- ----
-- --
---------- -- --
1Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore LIning, M=Matrix
Hydric Sollindicalors: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 Histosol (A1) 0 Sandy Redox (S5) 0 2 em Muck (A10)
0 Histic Epipedon (A2) 0 Stripped Matrix (S6) 0 Red Parent Material (TF2)
0 Black Histic (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Depleted 8elow Dark Surface (A 11) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Thick Dark Surface (A 12) 0 Redox Dark Surface (F6)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) 0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and wetland
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54) 0 Redox Depressions (F8)
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type: --
Depth (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks: parameter Is met
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
0 Surface Water (Al) 0 Water-Stained Leaves (89) 0 Water-Stained leaves (89)
0 High Water Table (A2) (excep1 MLRA 1. 2. 4A, and 49) (MLRA 1. 2. 4A, and 49)
0 Saturation (A3) 0 Salt Crust(911) 0 Drainage Patterns (810)
0 Water Marks (81) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates (813) 0 Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (82) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Drift Deposits (B3) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (84) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Shallow Aquilard (03)
0 Iron Deposits (B5) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CB) 0 FAG-Neutral Test (OS)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (86) 0 Stunted or Stresses Plants (01) (LRR A) 0 Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A)
0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): --
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): --
Saturation Present? Yes 0 No I3J Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0 (includes capillary fringe) --
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: none
Remarks: parameter is met
US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region
Project Site:
App1icantlOvvner:
Talbot Road Short Plat
Maldiz Investments
Investigator(s): Bill Granger
City/County; Renton! Sampling Date:
State: WA Sampling Point:
Section, Township, Range: 822 T23 N R5E
landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local reHef (concave, convex, none): .llQ!)£ Slope (%): ~
Subregion (LRR): 6 Lat: 47" 26' S8 w N Long: 122 0 12' 30" W Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: AJderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam 6% -15% Slopes NWI classification: PF01A
No o (If no, explain In Remarks.) Are climatic} hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology OJ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Ves 0 No 0
Are Vegetation 0, Soil D, Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? (If needed. explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc , , ,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Ves 0 No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Ves 0 No 0 Is the Sampling Area within a Wetland? Ves 0 No 0
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
Remarks: Depressional area below old wood rail fence, west of western property line
VEGETATION U -fro f I se sc en I IC names or plan 5
Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30') Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: % Cover Species? Status
1. Thuja plicata 1Q ""'-FAG Number of Dominant Species That Are
2. OSL, FACW, or FAC: l (A)
--------
3. --------Total Number of Dominant Species Across
4. All Strata: §: (8)
--------
50% = ,1.Q, 20% = 1. 1Q = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are
SaplingfShrub Stratum (Plot Size: ~ DBl, FACW, or FAC: ,[Q (N6)
1. Thuia plicate 25 ".. FAG Prevalence Index worksheet:
2. Alnus rubra jQ lli! FAG Total % Cover of: Multiply: by:;
3. S't!11l2horicamus albu§. 50 ""'-FAGU OBl species Q x1 = Q
4. Rubus discQlor 20 ""'-FAGU FACW species Q x2 = Q
5. Oem/erie r;!i.(J1sifQrmis § lli! FAGU FAC species §§: x3 = 165
50% = 52.5, 20% = £1 105 = Total Cover FACU species !l§: x4 = 380
Herb Stratum (Plot Size: ZQJ UPL species Q x5 = Q
1. Pofystichum munitum 1Q ""'-FACU Column Totals: 150 (A) 545 (8)
2. --------Prevalence Index = BfA = ~
3. -- --
----HydrophytJc Vegetation Indicators:
4. --------0 Dominance Test Is >50%
5. --------0 Prevalence Index is ~3.0'
6. --------0 Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in
7. --------Remarks or on a separate sheet)
8. --------0 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants 1
9. --------0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
10. --------
11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. --------unless disturbed or problematic.
50% = lQ, 20% = ~ 1Q = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: ~
1. -- ------Hydrophytic
2. ------Vegetation Yes 0 No 0 --
50% = __ , 20% = __ = Total Caver Present?
--
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum
Remarks: Parameter is nat met based on dominance and PI.
US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version
Project Site: ·Talbot Road Short Plat
SOIL Sampling Point· 5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' Lac2 Texture Remarks ---------
.Q..:£ 10YR 211 100 --------silt loam dose to 2/2
6 ·18 10YR 2f2 100 slit loam ----------
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
'Type: C= Concentration, O=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless othelWlse noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
:
0 Histosol (A1) 0 Sandy Redox (S5) 0 2 em Muck (A10)
0 Histic Eplpedon (A2) 0 Stripped Matrix (56) 0 Red Parent Material (TF2)
0 81ack Histic (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Thick Dark Surface (A12) 0 Redox Dark Surface (F6)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) 0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3'ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54) 0 Redox Depressions (Fa)
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
RestrictIve Layer (if present):
Type: --
Depth ([nches): Hydric Soils Present? Ves 0 No ~
Remarks: parameter is not met
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
0 Surface Water (A1) 0 Water·Stained Leaves (89) 0 Water·Stalned Leaves (89)
0 High Water Table (A2) (exceptMLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) (MlRA 1. 2. 4A. and 4B)
0 Saturation (A3) 0 Sa[tCrust(811) 0 Drainage Patterns (810)
0 Water Marks (81) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates (813) 0 Dry·Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment DepoSits (B2) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (G9)
0 Drift Deposits (83) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2)
0 Alga[ Mat or Crust (84) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Shallow Aquitard (03)
0 Iron Deposits (85) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CS) 0 FAC-Neutra[ Test (05)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (BS) 0 Stunted or Stresses Plants (D1) (LRR A) 0 Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A)
0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Frost·Heave Hummocks (07)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Ves 0 No ~ Depth (inches): --
Water Tab[e Present? Yes 0 No 181 Depth (inches): --
Saturation Present? Yes 0 No 181 Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Ves 0 No ~ (includes capillary fringe) --
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: none
Remarks: parameter is not met
US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region
Project Site:
ApplicantfOwner:
Investigator(s):
Talbot Road Short Plat
Maldiz Investments
Bill Granger
City/County: Rentonl Sampling Date:
Slate: WA Sampling Poin!: §
Section. Township, Range: 522 T23 N R5E
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): §lQQg Local relief (concave, convex, none): !JQ!l§:
Subregion (LRR): 8 Lat: 47" 26' 58" N Long: 122 0 12' 30H W
Soil Map Unit Name: AldeMood Gravelly Sandy loam 6% -15% Slopes NWI classification:
Slope (%): 3-5%
Datum: WGS84
PF01A
181 No 0 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation 0, Soil D, Or Hydrology 0, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances~ present? Yes !8J No D
Are Vegetation D, Soil D, Or Hydrology D. naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations transects Important features etc , , ,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No CiiI
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No CiiI Is the Sampling Area wIthin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 121
Wetrand Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No CiiI
Remarks: Upland ares west of depression at DPS
VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot Size: 30') Absolute Dominant Indicator DomInance Test Worksheet: % Cover Soecies? Status
1. Thuja olicata ~ = FAC Number of Dominant Species That Are 1 (A)
2. Acer macrophvf!um <Q = FACU OBl, FACW, or FAG:
3. ------ --
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
4. All Strata: i (B)
------ --
50% = 30, 20% = .12. §Q = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size: 20') DBl, FACW, or FAC: <Q (NB)
1. --------Prevalence Index worksheet:
2. --------Total % Cover of: MultiQl~ b~:
3. --------eBl species Q x1 = Q
4. --------FAGW species Q x2= Q
5. --------FAG species ~ x3= 120
50%= __ .20%= __ --= Total Cover FACU species ;!Q x4= 140
Herb Stratum (Plot Size: 20') UPl species 50 x5= 250
1. Hedera helix §Q -I:!l.ll!ElJ Column Totals: 125 (A) 510 (B)
2. Rubus discolor .1§ = FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.08
3. --------Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4. --------0 Dominance Test is >50%
5. --------0 Prevalence Index is .:::3.01
6. --------Morphological Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting data in 0
7. Remarks or on a separate sheet) --------
8. --------0 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants1
9. --------0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
10. --------
11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
------ --unless disturbed or problematic.
50% = 32.5, 20% = TI §Q = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size: __ )
1. --------Hydrophytic
2. --------Vegetation Yes 0 No CiiI
50%= __ ,20%= __ = Total Cover Present? --
% Bare Ground In Herb Stratum
Remarks: Parameter Is not met based on dominance and PI.
US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version
Project Site: -Talbot Road Short Plat
SOIL Sampling Point-6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) I
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (Moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks ---------
l!..o.§ 10YR 212 100 -- ------silt loam --
6 -16 10YR 3/4 100 gravsilt --------I~ ...... --
-------------- ----
------------------
-------- -- --
--------------------.----
------------------------------------
1Type : C= Concentration, O=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered Of Coated Sand Gralns_ '1.ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) . Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3;
0 Histosol (Ai) 0 Sandy Redox (55) -0 2 cm Muck (Ai0)
0 Histic Epipedon (A2) 0 Stripped Matrix (56) 0 Red Parent Material (TF2)
0 Black Histic (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (M) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) , , ,
0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) ,
0 Thick Dark Surface (A 12) 0 Redox Dark Surface (F6)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 0 Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Jlndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
0 Sandy GJeyed Matrix (S4) 0 Redox Depressions (Fa)
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or , oroblematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present): ,
Type: --i
Depth (Inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes 0 No 181
Remarks: parameter is not met
,
! ,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one req~ired; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
0 Surface Water (Ai) 0 Water·Stained Leaves-~Be) , 0 Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
0 High Water Table (A2) (except MI.RA 1. 2, 4A. and 48) (MLRA 1. 2. 4A, and 4B)
0 Saturation (A3) 0 Salt Crust (B 11) 0 Drainage Patterns (810)
0 Water Marks (B1) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates (813) , 0 Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (82) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ( 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Drift Deposits (83) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Llvlng -Roots (C3j 0 Geomorphic Position (02)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (B4) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) l 0 Shallow Aquitard (03) '#
0 Iron Deposits (85) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) 0 FAC-Neutral Test (OS)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (86) 0 Stunted or Stresses Plants (01) (LRR A) , 0 Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A)
0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks (07)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Ves 0 No 181 Depth (Inches): --
Water Table Present? Ves 0 No 181 Oepth (inches): --
Saturation Present? Ves 0 No 181 Depth fmches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 181 (includes capillary fringe) --
Describe Recorded Data {stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos. previous inspections}, if available: none
Remarks: parameter is not met
US Army Corps of Engineers W~stem Mountains, Valley, and Coast-Interim Version
Appendix C
Site Photographs
Photo 1 -Lo oking west along the
utilit y easement that parallels the
southern property line of the subject
parce l. Vie w is from off of the subject
property (subj ect is to the ri ght) and
this easement i s off of the su bj ect
property.
Ph o t o 2 -Look ing east into t he
cleared offsite we tland (near
datapoint #3,
Photo 3 -Dat apoint #1 in wetlands
n ear flags # 2 -4. Thi s wetl and is off
of the subjec t property.
Photo 4 -Data point #2 in u pla nd s
adjace nt to data point #1. No te th er
predominance of En gl ish Ivy .
Photo 5 -Datapoint #3. View i s
lo ok in g east across t he upland area
along th e existing driveway and
across the di tc hed wet land (see pink
f lag) near f lag #8.
Photo 6 -Datapoint #4 insid e
wetlands east of th e subj ect
prope rty.
Photo 7 -Data point #5 in an upland
depression loc ated west of th e
subject property.
Photo 8 -Datapoint #6 in upl ands
on the subject property. The
depression at data point #5 is i n the
background.
Photo 9 -View loo ki ng west do w n
the "pipestem" driveway.
Photo 10 -View from the same
lo cation as Photo 1, look ing north to
t he a bandon e d resid e nce.
Photo 11-Vi ew from th e same
location as Photos 1 and 10, looki ng
so uth i nto the forested wetlands
that are located offsite. Access was
not allowed into this pa rc el.
Photo 12 -View looking west alon g
the offsi te utility easement into a
willow thicket on the south side of
the easement. This area is depicted
as the i nterpolated wetland on
Fi gure 2.
AppendixD
Wetland Rating Forms
Wetland name or number 1'AC Be(r Q-.~, . :5 '
WETLAND RATING FORM -WESTERN WASffiNGTON
Version 2 -Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users
Updated Oct 2008 with the new WDFW definitions for priority habitats
Name of wetland (if known): _1J.J..;~~l :::..h13..i!f..~:J;T,--_<_· '-,:_~' --J;,"L.. __ Date of site visit: la If;' . ']: -,-I
Rated by 15 i l-L. C; If-A VI}, ~.z. Trained by Ecology? Yes '>'&0_ Date of training "7 (; D , ' • I '
SEC: 1&TWNSHP: 2~ RNGE:$ Is SiT/R in Appendix D? Yes_, NarY
Map of wetland unit: Figure __ Estimated size __ _
SUMMARY OF RATING
Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland
I II_ 1U_ IV.I\
Category I = Score >=70
Category II = Score 51-69
Category III = Score 30-50
Category IV = Score < 30
Score for Water Quality Functions
Score for Hydrologic Functions
Score for Habitat Functions
TOTAL score for Functions
Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland
1_ II_ Does not Apply )<
r1
Final Category (choose tlte "highest" category from above) I {. Ii I
s ummaryo f b ' . ~ aSlC In orma ti on a b tth ou tI d 't ewe an um
Wetland U ilit has Special Wetland HGM Class
Characteristics used for Ratio!!
Estuariue Depressional
Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine
Bo!! Lake-frin2e
Mature Forest Slope )i
Old Growth Forest Flats
Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal
Interounal
None of the above ~ Check if unit has multiple
HOM classes oresent
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington August 2004
version 2 To be used with Ecology Publication 04-06-025
Wetland name or number ~ AL-35\
Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below?
If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland
according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland.
Check List for Wetlands That May Need Additional Protection YES
(in addition to the protection recommended for its category)
SPI. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed
Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (FIE species)?
For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the
appropriate state or federal database.
SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed
NO
)Z
Threatened or Endangered animal species? tK. For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the
appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are
categorized as Category I Natural Heritage Wetlands (see p. 19 of data form).
SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the
WDFW for the state?
SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its jUnctions?
For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master
Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as
having special significance.
To complete the next part ofthe data sheet you will need to determine the
Hydrogeomorphic Class ofthe wetland being rated.
1<
,.,I
,/I,
The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This
simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic
Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions
on classifying wetlands.
Wetland Rating Fonm -western Washington 2
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
August 2004
Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington
If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being
rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which
hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8.
1. r1e water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)?
NO -go to 2 YES -the wetland class is Tidal Fringe
fyes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per
thousand)? YES -Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine)
If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine
wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that
were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt
Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were
categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this
revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept.
Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine
wetlands have changed (see p. ) .
. e wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it.
<[tcund ater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit.
!j~U -g to 3 YES -The wetland class is J<'\ats
1 lour wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional
wetlands.
3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria?
_The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water
/\ (without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size;
If ~_At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)?
~o. --:~go to 4 YES -The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe)
4. Doeslhe entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria?
/ ~ The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradua£),
~ The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually
, comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without
v-distinct banks.
---LiThe water leaves the wetland without being impounded?
NOTE: Sur,facew,ater does not pond in these type af wetlands except occasionally in
very smalliand shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually
<3ft di~eter am:jless than 1 foot deep).
NO -go to 5 IYES -pie wetland class is Slope
( " ~:' ... "
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 3
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
August 2004
.. j.-.;;-;=', ~ ~":-(-~?"
--M(." ');'J i Wetland name or number __ ! ' .. ",'-'
5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria?
__ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank
flooding from that stream or river
__ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years.
NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is
not flooding.
NO -go to 6 YES -The wetland class is Riverine
6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the
surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the
interior of the wetland.
NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional
7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank
flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be
maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious
natural outlet.
NO -go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional
8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM
clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small
stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND
IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRffiED IN QUESTIONS 1-7
APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use
the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several
HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is
recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit
being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the
wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area.
HGM Classes within the wetland unit beinf! rated HGM Class to Use in Ratinf!
Slope + Riverine Riverine
Slope + Depressional Depressional
Slope + Lake-fringe Lake-fringe
Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional
Depressional + Lake-fringe Depressional
Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under
wetland wetlands with special
characteristics
If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you
have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional
for the mting.
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 4
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
August 2004
Wetland name or number ·,-rt\,\-\5!) "'\
---.--,-~---
S Slope Wetlands Points
WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS -Indicators that the wetland unit functions to (only 1 score
improve water quality per box)
S S 1. Does the wetland unit have the I!otential to improve water quality? (seep.64)
S S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of unit:
Slope isl % or less (a 1% slope has a 1 foot vertical drop in elevation for every 100ft
horizontal distance) points =3 I Slope is 1%: 2%" points = 2 • dlloj)e ~s f'J'o'..5%: points = 1
Slope is greater than 5% points = 0
S S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic (useNRCS
definitions) 0 YES = 3 points NO = 0 points
S S 1.3 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Figure_
Chuwu! the puints appropn'ate jor the description that best fits the ve'getatiol1 in the
wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (> 75%
cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 inches.
Dense, uncut, herbaceous vegetation> 90% ofthe wetland area points =6
Dense, uncut, herbaceous vegetation> 1/2 of area points =3
~Dense, WOOdy, vegetation> Y, of area ~V~p(l..li':" ~M-r points = 2 ~ Dense, uncut, herbaceous vegetation> 1/4 of area points = 1
Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points = 0
Aerial pholo or map with veQetation polYQons
S Total forS 1 Add the points in the boxes above -----I -.: I _ ..... --._-
S S 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep.67)
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water
coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or
groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which of the follOWing conditions
provide the sow'ces of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants comtngfrom several
sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity.
-Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft
-Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland
-Tilled fields, logging, or orchards within I SO feet of wetland
XJ Residential, urban areas, or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope ofwetIand multiplier
-Other 2-
YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 --
S TOTAL -Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from S I by S2 ~ Add score to table on p. 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington II August 2004
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
Wetland name or number YA-Li? &"f'
S Slope Wetlands Points
HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS • Indicators that the wetland unit functions to (only 1 score
reduce flooding and stream erosion per box)
S 3. Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce flooding and stream (see p. 68)
erosion?
S S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms.
Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fit conditions in the wetland.
(stems of plants should be thick enough (usually> 1!8in), or dense enough, to remain
erect during surface flows)
Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation covers > 90% of the area of the wetland. points = 6 J --"'7 Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/2 area of wetland points=3
Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> 1/4 area points = I
More than 114 of area is grazed, mowed, tilled or vegetation is
not rigid points = 0
S S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds hack small amounts offload flows:
The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at least () 10% of Its area. . YE~points = 2
0) points =0
S Add tliePoints in the boxes above ,--:'3--, -----s S 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosiou?
Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it provides
seep. 70)
helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive
andlor erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply.
-Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding
problems
-Other multiplier
(Answer NO if the major source of water is controlled by a reservoir (e.g. wetland is a seep _t
that is on the downstream sicfeecffii'dam)
YES multijllier is 2 (NO ]:Iltiplier is 1
S TOTAL • Hyd'reloglc Functions Multiply the score from S 3 by S 4 :3 Add score to table on p. 1
Comments
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 12 August 2004
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
/r/1.A r7 ~
Wetland name or number ~I V\,:::>" I
,------------_. __ ._-------------=--:-----,
Points I These questions apply to wetlands 0/ all HGM classes.
HABIT A T FUNCTIONS -Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat
HI. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species?
H Ll Vegetation structure (see p. 72)
Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each
class is V, acre or mOre than 10% of the area if Wlit is smaller than 2.5 acres.
Aquatic bed :x::: Emergent plants t-A-i.JfJ fi . _
__ Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) I ''Z' I)'() _0
If the unit has aforested class check if ' ),./\?, I "" .
LForested (areas where trees have >30% cover) ~,~t~r. ",..-P1$
~The forested class has 3 out of5 strata (canopy, sub-can y, shrubs, he~Baceous,
moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon
Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have:
Map of Coward in vegetation classes
4 structures or more
,,~ :i )structures
"2 structures
points = 4
points = 2
points = I
(only 1 score
per box)
Figure_
1 structure
H L2. Hydroperiods (seep. 73)
noint. = 0 .-----"""""'-=><--h;:;------i Figure_
Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland, The water
regime has 10 cover more Ihan1 0% of the wetland or V, acre to count. (see text for
descriptions of hydro periods)
__ Pennanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points = 3
points = 2
point = 1
points = 0
__ Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present
Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present =4 Saturated only I type present
__ Pennanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland
__ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland
__ Lake-fringe wetland ~2 points
Freshwater tidal wetland = 2 points Map of hydroperiods
H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75)
Countthe number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft'.
of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold)
You do not have to name the species.
Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife,
If you counted: > 19 species
Lisl species below if you want to: -7 5 -19 species
< 5 species
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 13
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
(different patches
Canadian Thistle
points = 2
points = 1
points =0
Total for page
August 2004
o
1
3
· .
Wetland name or number 4;;(3t>--:-
H 104. Interspersion of habitats (see p. 76)
Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation
classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or
mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none.
o
~.-' .. --' ....... ~,
( Low = I point Moderate = 2 points None = 0 points
~
High = 3 points
[riparian braided channels]
NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water
the rating is always "hi ". Use map of Cowardin ve etation classes
H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (see p. 77)
Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the
number of points you put into the next column.
__ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long).
__ Standing snags (diameter at the bottom> 4 inches) in the wetland
__ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) andlor overhanging vegetation extends at
least 3.3 ft (1m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft
(lOrn)
__ Stable steep banks offine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning
(>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that
have not yetlurned greylbrown)
__ At least y., acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas
'.i' that are permanently or seasonally inundated. (structures for egg-laying by amphibians)
~ Invasive plants cover less than 25% ofthe wetland area in each stratum of plants
igure_
l
,
!
NOTE: The 20% stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. ~----~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~------~~----
H ~d~~T AL Score -r;;~e~t~/~r ;~~irlj;l4ha;}a; ES
L-____ ~ ______ ~~:.:::e:..::s::::co~r.::::es:..J.:..:.0::::m=!..: . .:.:,~c::. ::!.'.:.:.:.:..::' ~, =:.'-'.'c.:.:.::.:,.::........e. ~~~_ ...
Comments
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 14 August 2004
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
..
-"/:". .-r-
Wetland name or nllmber ~v \,.;>1} •
\
H 2. Does the wetland nnit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species?
H2.1 Buffers (seep. 80) Figure_
Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring
criterion that applies to the wetlond is to be used in the rating. See textfor definition of
'"undisturbed. '"
-100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95%
of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively
undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5
-100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water>
50% circumference. Points = 4
-50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95%
circumference. Points = 4
-100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 25%
circumference, . Points = 3
-50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for>
50% circumference. Points = 3
If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above
-No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95% i'
circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2
-No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference.
Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2
-Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = 1
-Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled
. fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = O. ~ Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = 1
Aerial photo showing buffers
H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (see p. 81)
H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor
(either riparian or upland) that is at least ISO ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest
or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed
uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian con'idors, heavily used gravel
roads,paved roads, are considered break.s in the corridor).
YES = 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.2
H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor
(either riparian or upland) that is at .least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or
forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25
acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in
the question above?
YES = 2 points (go 10 H 2.3) NO = H 2.2.3 O·
H 2.2.3 Is the wetland:
within 5 mi (8km) ofa brackish or salt water estuary OR
within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR ___ ~
within I mi of a lake greaterthan 20 acres? ~ .""--------
YES = 1 point ( NO = 0 points '
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 15 August 2004
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
riA-0. r-:-
Wetland name or number -?I;;>O \
H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete
descriptions ojWDFW priority Itabitats, and tlte counties in which tltey call be found, in
tlte PHS report http://wdfW.wa.l!ovlhablehslist.htm )
Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland unit? NOTE: the
connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed
_Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha (1 acre).
__ Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various
species of native fish and wildlife (foil descriptions in WDFW PHS reportp.152).
__ Herbaceons Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock.
__ Old-growthlMature forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree
species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20
treeslha (8 trees/acre) > 81 em (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. (Mature forests) Stands
with average diameters exceeding 53 em (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less that 100%;
crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of
large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80 -200 years old
west of the Cascade crest.
__ Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where
canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS
report p. 158).
__ RipariQ.n: The ClfCQ. adja":'t:illt Lv a.yua~il,; ;:,y~tclJl:S wiLll flowing water Tnat comatns elements ot
both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other.
__ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the
form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161).
__ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions
that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife
resourceS.
__ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore,
Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (filii descriptions o/habitats and the
definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report: pp. 167-169 and glossary in
Appendix AJ-
__ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under
the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a
human.
__ Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft.
__ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 -2.0 m (0.5 -6.5 ft),
composed of basalt, andesite, andlor sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine
tailings. May be associated with cliffs.
__ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient 1')-"
decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a L,
diameter at breast height of> 51 em (20 in) in western Washington and are > 2 m (6.5 ft) in
height. Priority logs are> 30 em (12 in) in diameter at the largest end, and> 6 m (20 ft)
long.
If wetland has 3 or more priority babitats = 4 points _____ --
If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points,' "\
If wetland has 1 priority habitat = 1 point ~Ohabitats = 0 points ,;
Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a prioritf habitat but are.!J.Ql.1ndUded in this
list. NearhJL wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4)-------"---
Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington 16 August 2004
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
' ..
Wetland name or number 18V1?'b!
H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description o/the landscape around the wetland that
bestfits) (seep. 84)
There are at least 3 other wetlands within Y:. mile, and the connections between them are
relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some
boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other
development. points = 5
The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe
wetlands within Y:. mile points =5
There are at least 3 other wetlands within Y:. mile, BUT the connections between them are 2-disturbed points = 3
The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe
wetland within Y:. mile points = 3
.,eThere is at least I wetland within Y:. mile. points = 2
There are no wetlands within 'h mile. points = 0
-----H 2. TOTAL Score -opportunity for providing habitat I 3 I
Add the scores from H2./,H2.2, m.3, H2.4 I I -----TOTAL for HI from page 14 6 _ .... 0::::. __
Total Score for Habitat Fuuctions -add the points for H I, H 2 and record the result on f) p.1
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 17 August 2004
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
~I\ I p!f'(
Wetland name or number i J/f '../'V --I
CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS
Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the
appropriate answers and Category.
Wetland Type Category
Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the
appropriate criteria are met.
SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (see p. 86)
Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands?
-The dominant water regime is tidal,
-Vegetated, and
-With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt.
NO 'f YES = Go to SC 1.I
SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park,
National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Cat. I
Environmental, or Scientific ReserVe designated under WAC 332-30-151 ?
YES = Category I NO jl;0 to SC 1.2
SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least I acre in size and meets at least two of the
following three conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II Cat. I
-The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, Cat. II
cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant
species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover
more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual
rating (Jill). The area ofSpartina would be rated a Category II while the rating
relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a IIII Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in
determining the size threshold of 1 acre.
-A.t least :y. of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of
shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland.
-The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels,
depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands.
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 18 August 2004
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
'C '
Wetland name or number ~ .. /'iSOl
t
SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (see p. 87)
Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage
ProgramIDNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support
state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species.
SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a SectionffownshiplRange that contains a
Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites
before you need to contact WNHPIDNR)
SlTfR information from Appendix D _ or accessed from WNHPJDNR web site A
YES __ -contact WNHPIDNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NO )!;
SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as
or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant speci;\,
YES = Category I NO not a Heritage Wetland
SC 3.0 Bogs (see p. 87)
Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and
vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identifY if the wetland is a bog. If you
answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions.
1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (Le. layers of organic soil), either
peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the
soil profile? (See Appendix B f)'lf leld key to identify organic soils)? Yes -
go to Q. 3 to -go to Q. 2
2. Does the unit have organic so Is, Ither peats or mucks that are less than 16
inches deep over bedrock, or an Impermeable hardpan such as clay or
volcanic ash, or that are floating on a leo pond?
Yes -go to Q. 3 No - s not a bog for purpose of rating
3. Does the unit have more than 70% ov of mosses at ground level, AND
other plants, if present, consist of the 'bog" species listed in Table 3 as a
significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub
and herbaceous cover consists of species in Tabl ,')?
Yes -Is a bog for purpose of rating /INO -0 to Q, 4
NOTE: If you are uncertain about the exteft of osses in the understory
you may substitute that criterion by measu· the pH of the water that
seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. [fthe pH is less than 5.0 and the
"bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog.
1. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western
red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's
spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of
species) on the bog species plant Jist in Table 3 as a significant component
of the ground cover (> 30% coveral!:::rhe total shrublherbaceous cover)?
2. YES = Category I (l~~ Is not a bog for purpose of rating
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 19 August 2004
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
Cat. !
Cat. I
\Vetland name or number
SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (see p. 90)
Does the wetland unit have at least I acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for
the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? g you answer yes
you will still need to rate the wetland based on its jUne/ions.
-Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species,
forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8
trees/acre (20 treeslhectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a
diameter at breast height (dbh) of32 inches (81 cm) or more.
NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests.
Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh
because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR"
so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter.
-Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are·
80 -200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches
(53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of
snags, and quantity of large ~)ed material is generally less than that found
in old-growth. .
YES = Category I NO _not a forested wetland with special characteristics
/
SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal L~ (see p. 91)
Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon?
-The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly
or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks,
shingle, or, less frequently, rocks
-The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is
saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) d~'ni'tn. ost of the year in at least a portion
of the lagoon (needs to be mea. red I;zear the bottom)
YES = Go to SC 5.1 , 0 ~ not a wetland in a coastal lagoon
i ."
SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all oftlre'following three conditions?
-The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling,
cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant
species (see list of invasive species on p. 74).
-At least % of the landward edge ofthe wetland has a 100 ft buffer of
shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland.
-The wetland is larger than III 0 acre (4350 square feet)
YES = Category I NO = Category II
Wetland Rating Fonn -western Washington 20 August 2004
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
Cat. I
Cat. I
Cat.n
, .. ' ~, .
Wetland name or number
SC 6.0 Interduual Wetlands (seep. 93)
Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (,s~.called the Western Boundary of Upland
Ownership or WBUO)? .'. '\
YES -go to SC 6.1 .NO _... not an interdunal wetland for rating
lfyou answer yes you will stillf,eed'to rate the wetland based on its
functions.
In practical terms that means the following geographic areas:
Q Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103
• Grayland-Westport-Iands west ofSR 105
• Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west ofSR 115 and SR 109
SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is
once acre or larger?
YES ~ Category II NO -go to SC 6.2 Cat. II
SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is
between 0.1 and I acre?
YES = Category III
Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics
Choose the "highest" rating if wetland falls into several categories, and record on
p.l.
If you answered NO for all types enter "Not Applicable" on p.1
Wetland Rating Form -western Washington 21 August 2004
version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct. 2008
Cat. III
Geotechnical Engineering
Geology
Environmental Scientists
Cons truction Moni toring
RECEIVED
JAN 2 9 20\4
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
.'-"'GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
TALBOT ROAD SHORT PLAT
3340 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH
RENTON, WASHINGTON
ES-3026
,
PREPARED FOR
Caliber Real Estate
October 21,2013
~ ~l i&>:
Henry0wright, E.I.T.
Staff Engineer
Raymond A. Coglas, P.E.
Principal
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
TALBOT ROAD SHORT PLAT
3340 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH
RENTON, WASHINGTON
ES-3026
Earth Solutions NW, LLC
1805 _136 th Place Northeast, Suite 201
Bellevue, Washington 98005
Phone: 425-449-4704 Fax: 425-449-4711
Toll Free: 866-336-8710
. Important Information About Your -
--~ --
Geotechnical Engineering Report
Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes . • -__ ~!orm.!.tirJ.~_i3provlded to help you manage your risks.
Geotechnical Services Are Performed for
Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects
Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of
their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engi-
neer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another
civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each
geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solelyfor the client. No
one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without
first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one
-not even you -should apply the report for any purpose or project
except the one originally contemplated.
RII8d the FUll Report
Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical
engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an exeoutive summary.
Do not read selected elements only.
A Geotechnical EnglneerlBg Report Is Based on
A Unique Set of Project-8peciDc Factors
Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project-specific fac-
tors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the
client's goals, objecfives, and risk management preferences; the general
nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of
the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements,
such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the
geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates oth-
erwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was:
• not prepared for you,
• not prepared for your project,
• not prepared for the specifiC site explored, or
• completed before important project changes were made.
Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical
engineering report Include those that affect:
• the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a
parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant
to a refrigerated warehouse,
• elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the
proposed structure,
• composition of the design team, or
• project ownership.
As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project
changes~ven minor ones--and request an assessment of their impact.
Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems
that OCC1Jr because their reports do not consider developments of which
they were not informed.
Subsurface Condilians can Change
A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at
the time the study was pertormed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineer-
ing report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of
time; by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site;
or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua-
tions. Always confact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report
to detemnine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or
analysis could prevent major problems.
Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional
Opinions
Site exploration identifies subsurtace conditions only at those points where
subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engi-
neers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional
judgment to render an opinion about subsurtace condijions throughout the
site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ-sometimes significantly-
from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer
who developed your report to provide construction observation is the
mosl effective method of managing the risks aSSOCiated with unantiCipated
conditions.
A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final
Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your
report. Those recommendaUons are not final, because geotechnical engi-
neers develop them prinCipally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical
engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual
subsurtace conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical
engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or
liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer does not pertorm
construction observation.
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to
Misinterpretation
Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering
reports has resulted in cosHy problems. Lower that risk by having your geo-
technical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after
submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review perti-
nent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can
also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by
having your geotechnical engineer partiCipate in prebid and preconstructibn
conferences, and by providing construction observation.
Do Not Redraw ilia Engineer's Lugs
Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon
their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or
omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should
never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings.
Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, bul recognize
that separating logs from the report can elevale risk.
Give Cuntractors a Complete Repurt and
Guidance
Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make
contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what
they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give con-
tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, butpreface IT with a
clearly written leller of transmitlal. In that letter, advise contractors that the
report was not prepared for purposes of bid davelOjJment and that the
report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical
engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to
conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of infomnation they
need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. 8e sure contrac-
loIS have sufficient time to pertomn additional study. Only then might you
be in a position to give contractors the best infomnation available to you,
while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities
stemming from unanticipated conditions.
Read ResponsIbIlity Provisions Clusely
Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that
geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disci-
plines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that
have led to disappOintments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk
of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of
explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled 'limitations"
many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsi-
bilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities
and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical
engineer should respond fully and frankly.
Geuenvil'ollmental Cuncel'ns Are Not Coverell
The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to pertorm a geoenviron-
mental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical
study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually
relate any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations;
e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or
regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led
to numerous project failures. ff you have not yet obtained your own geoen-
vironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk man-
agement guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for
someone else.
Obtain Professlunal Assistance To Deal with Mold
Diverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction,
operation, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from
growing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be
devised for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated into a com-
prehensive plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional
mold prevention consultant. Because just a small amount of water or
moisture can lead to the development of severe mold infestations, a num-
ber of mold prevention strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry.
While groundwater, water infiltration, and similar issues may have been
addressed as part of the geotechnical engineering study whose findings
are conveyed ilt-this report, the geotechnical engineer in charge of this
projecl is not a mold prevention consultant none of the services per-
formed In connection with the geotechnical engineer's study
were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold preven-
tion_ Proper implementation of Ihe recommendations conveyed
in Ihis report will not of Itself be sufflcient to prevent mold from
growing in or on the structure invotved_
~ely, un Your A8fE-Mellber Geotechnclal
. ED!llneer lur Addltilllal AsSistance
Membership in ASFE/The Best People on Earth exposes geotechnical
engineers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of
genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction projecl. Confer
with you ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information.
ASFE
ne .'51 ........ IIrn
8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Telephone: 301/565-2733 Facsimile: 301/589-2017
e-mail: info@asfe.org www.asfe.org
Copyright 2004 by ASFE, Inc. Duplication, reproduction, or copying of tIlfs document, in whale or In Part. by any means whatsoever; is strictly prohibitBd. except wfth ASFE's
speC/fic written permission. ExcBfptIng, quo#ng. or otherwise extractfng wording from this documem is permitted only with the express writtS(f permission at ASFE, and only for
purposes of Sella/any research or book review. Only members of ASFE may use this document as a complement to or as an e/emef!t of a geotechnal engineering report. Any ather
firm, IndMduaJ, or other entity th8t so uses this document without being an ASFE member could be committing negligent or intentional (fnJudufent) misrepresentation.
IIGER06045.0M
October 21,2013
ES-3026
Caliber Real Estate
19125 North Creek Parkway, Suite 123
Bothell, Washington 98011
Attention: Mr. David Albers
Dear Mr. Albers:
Earth Solutions NW LLC
.. Geotechnical Engineering
• Construction Monitoring
• Environmental Sciences
Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW)is pleased to present this report titled "Geotechnical
Engineering Study, Talbot Road Short Plat, Renton, Washington".
In general, the site is underlain primarily by firm glacial till deposits. In our OpiniOn, the
proposed residential structures can be supported on conventional continuous and spread
footing foundations bearing on competent native soils, re-compacted native soils, or structural
fill. Competent soils suitable for support of foundations should be encountered at depths of
between two to five feet below existing grades. Where loose or unsuitable soil conditions are
exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of
structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with a suitable structural fill material will be
necessary.
Recommendations for foundation design, retaining wall design, site preparation, drainage, and
other pertinent recommendations are provided in this study.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have questions
regarding the content of this geotechnical engineering study, please call.
Sincerely,
EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC
\A----.,t ltv ~e~ry T . .t:.,right, E.I.T.
Staff Engineer
1805 -136th place N.E., Suite 201 • Bellevue, WA 98005 • (4251449-4704 • FAX (4251 449-4711
Table of Contents
ES-3026
PAGE
INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1
General............... ..................... ........................ .......... 1
Project Description............................................... ........ 2
SITE CONDITIONS.................... ............... ............... ......... ....... 2
Surface................. .............................. ......................... 2
Slope Reconnaissance................................................. 2
Subsurface.............................. ..................................... 3
Topsoil......................................................... ...... 3
FilL............. ........................ .............................. 3
Native Soli .......................................................... 3
Geologic Setting.................................................. 3
Groundwater................................................................. 3
CRITICAL AREAS AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDOUS AREAS
ASSESSMENT....................................................................... 4
Site and Construction Plans........................................... 4
Landslide Hazard......... ...... ...... ......... ................... 4
Steep Slopes.................................... ................... 4
Erosion Hazard........... .......... ............................... 5
Coal Mine Hazard........................... ...................... 5
Analysis of Proposal...................................................... 6
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................. 6
General........... ............................................................. 6
Site Preparation and Earthwork.. ............ ................... ...... 6
Site Stripping Recommendations.. ..... ........ ........ ......... 7
Temporary Erosion Control..... .................... ................. 7
In-situ Soils.............................. .......... ..... ........... ..... ....... 7
Wet Season Grading...... ....................................... 7
Imported Soils............................ ....... ........ ..... ............... 7
Building and Pavement Subgrade Preparation.......... 8
Structural Fill................. .................. ........... ...... ............. 8
Table of Contents
Continued
ES-3026
PAGE
Excavations and Slopes ... ................. ........ .............. ......... ....... 9
Foundations..................................... ... ........................ 9
Seismic Design Considerations........ ... ...... ... ...... ............ 10
Slab-On-Grade Floors... ... .............................................. 10
Retaining Walls...... ...................................... ................ 10
Drainage ......................................................................... .......... 11
Utility Support and Trench Backfill................................... 11
Pavement Sections... ... ... ... ......... ...... ...... ...... ... ... ...... ..... 12
LIMITATIONS....................................... ............... .................. 12
Additional Services...... ............ ...... ......... ... ... ... ... ..... ..... 12
GRAPHICS
Plate 1
Plate 2
Plate 3
Plate 4
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Appendix B
Vicinity Map
Test Pit Location Plan
Retaining Wall Drainage Detail
Footing Drain Detail
Subsurface Exploration
Test Pit Logs
Laboratory Test Results
General
GEOTECHNiCAL ENGiNEERiNG STUDY
TALBOT ROAD SHORT PLAT
3340 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH
RENTON, WASHINGTON
ES·3026
INTRODUCTION
This geotechnical engineering study was prepared for the residential short plat to be developed
south of South 32 nd Street at 3340 Talbot Road South in Renton, Washington. The purpose of
this study was to explore subsurface conditions across the site and develop geotechnical
recommendations for the proposed project. Our scope of services for completing this
geotechnical engineering study included the following:
• Conducting subsurface explorations within accessible portions of the development for
the purposes of assessing soil and groundwater conditions;
• Laboratory testing of soil samples obtained from the subsurface exploration;
• Assessing the suitability of site soils for use as structural fill;
• Recommendations for soil bearing capacity, subgrade preparation, and retaining wall
design;
• Conducting a coal mine hazard review;
• Conducting engineering analyses, and;
• Preparation of this report.
The following documents/maps were reviewed as part of our report preparation:
• Pre-Application Site Plan, Option 1 and 2, prepared by PacWest Engineering, LLC,
dated May 17, 2013;
• Topographic survey provided to us by PacWest Engineering, LLC;
• Coal Mine Hazard Areas, prepared by City of Renton, dated January 22, 2008, and;
• Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle.
Caliber Real Estate
October 21, 2013
Proiect Description
ES-3026
Page 2
We understand the subject site will be developed with four or five residential lots, an access
roadway, and a stormwater detention tract. Given the topography of the site, we anticipate
grading activities will likely involve cuts and fills on the order of two to four feet to establish the
final design grades. We understand that stormwater will be directed to a detention vault on-site.
The proposed residential structures are anticipated to consist of relatively lightly-loaded wood
framing supported on conventional foundations. Based on our experience with similar
developments, we estimate wall loads on the order of two kips per lineal foot and slab-on-grade
loading of 150 pounds per square foot (psf).
If the above design assumptions are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review
the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review the final design to confirm that our
geotechnical recommendations have been incorporated into the plans.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface
The subject site is located south of South 32 nd Street at 3340 Talbot Road South in Renton,
Washington, as illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Plate 1). The site is approximately 1.37 acres
and is comprised of lightly forested land with a single-family residence centrally located on the
property. Topography of the site appears to be relatively level with a slight west facing slope
with an increasing gradient along the access roadway portion of the site. An isolated area
within the access road portion of the property is mapped by the City of Renton as a sensitive
slope, however, based on review of the referenced topographic survey, the average gradient
through the access road is approximately 14 percent across a vertical relief of 60 feet with a
maximum gradient of approximately 18 percent across a vertical relief of 10 feet; the site does
not contain and is not adjacent to any slopes of 40 percent or greater. The southerly margins of
the property is mapped by the City of Renton as an unclassified coal mine hazard area. A
wetland tract is mapped to the southeast of the property. The site is bordered to the north by
residential lots, to the east and south by undeveloped land, and to the west by residential lots
and Talbot Road South. The Test Pit Location Plan (Plate 2) illustrates the approximate limits
of the property.
Slope Reconnaissance
During our fieldwork, we performed a visual slope reconnaissance across portions of the sloped
areas of the site. The main focus of our reconnaissance was to identify signs of instability or
erosion hazards along the slope areas. The typical instability indicators include such features
as head scarps, tension cracks, hummocky terrain, groundwater seeps along the surface and
erosion features such as gulleys and rills. During the slope reconnaissance, no signs of recent,
large scale erosion or slope instability were observed. In general, based on the slope
reconnaissance, stability of the slope areas of the property can be characterized as good.
Earth Solutions NW, llC
'Caliber Real Estate
October 21, 2013
Subsurface
ES-3026
Page 3
Four test pits were excavated on accessible portions of the site in October 2013 for the purpose
of assessing the soil and groundwater conditions. Please refer to the test pit logs provided in
Appendix A for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions.
Topsoil
Topsoil was observed in the upper approximately 6 to 12 inches. The topsoil was characterized
by dark brown color and the presence of fine organic material.
Fill
Existing fill was observed at test pits TP-1 and TP-3 extending to an average depth of
approximately two and one half to five feet below existing grades. The fill was observed to
consist of a brown to dark brown sandy silt in a loose, wet condition.
Native Soil
Underlying the topsoil and fill, native soils consisting primarily of medium dense to dense sandy
silt (ML) and silty sand (SM) glacial till deposits were encountered extending to the maximum
exploration depth of 10 feet below existing grades.
Geologic Setting
The referenced geologic map resource identifies glacial till (Qgt) deposits throughout the site
and surrounding areas. The native soil conditions observed at the test pit locations are
consistent with the geologic mapping for the site.
The National Resources Conservation
gravelly sandy loam across the site.
Alderwood series soils,
Groundwater
Service (NRCS) Soil Survey identifies Alderwood
The soil conditions observed are consistent with
Groundwater seepage was observed at all test pit locations during our fieldwork (October 2013)
at depths of approximately four to six feet below existing grades, which likely represents
perched groundwater. Seepage should be expected in deeper excavations. Groundwater
seepage rates and elevations fluctuate depending on many factors, including precipitation
duration and intensity, the time of year, and soil conditions. In general, groundwater flow rates
are higher during the wetter, winter months.
Eart~ Solutions NW, LLC
'caliber Real Estate
October 21,2013
ES-3026
Page 4
CRITICAL AREAS AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDOUS AREAS ASSESSMENT
As part of this geotechnical engineering study and critical areas report, the City of Renton
Critical Areas Regulations (4-3-050J) were reviewed. Per the City of Renton Critical Areas
Regulations requirements, the following topics related to development plans and site conditions
are addressed.
Site and Construction Plans
The attached Test Pit Location Plan (Plate 2) illustrates a conceptual layout of the proposed
four or five residential lot development. The building pad elevations will vary according to
existing grades. We anticipate the maximum cuts for the proposed development will be on the
order of two to four feet. The access roadway is mapped through an isolated sensitive slope
area. Based on review of the referenced section of the City of Renton Municipal Code, as well
as City of Renton GIS data, landslide hazards, steep slopes, erosion hazards, and coal mine
hazards are considered for the subject development.
Landslide Hazard
With respect to landslide hazard areas, Part 4-3-050J-1b of the City of Renton Critical Areas
Regulations defines landslide hazard areas as the following:
• Low Landslide Hazard: Areas with slopes less than 15 percent.
• Medium Landslide Hazard: Areas with slopes between 15 percent and 40 percent and
underlain by soils that consist largely of sand, gravel or glacial till.
• High Landslide Hazards: Areas with slopes greater than 40 percent and areas with
slopes between 15 percent and 40 percent and underlain by soils consisting largely of
silt and clay.
• Very High Landslide Hazards: Areas of known mappable landslide deposits.
The natural slope along the access road portion of the site is not mapped as a landslide hazard
by the City of Renton GIS data, however, based on a greater than 15 percent slope condition it
is considered a medium landslide hazard by the City of Renton Critical Areas Regulations. As
previously described in the Slope Reconnaissance section of this study, no signs of recent
instability were observed and the overall global stability of the slope areas can be characterized
as good.
Steep Slopes
With respect to steep slope critical areas, the referenced section of the Renton Code defines
steep slopes as follows:
• Sensitive Slopes: Areas with slopes between 25 percent and 40 percent.
• Protected Slopes: Areas with.slopes greater than 40 percent.
Earth Solutions NW, LLC
Caliber Real Estate
October 21,2013
ES-3026
Page 5
An isolated sensitive slope area is mapped on the City of Renton GIS data, however, based on
review of the referenced topographic survey the maximum slope gradient is approximately 18
percent across a vertical relief of 10 feet. Therefore, in our opinion, no sensitive slope area
exists on-site. In general, based on the slope reconnaissance, stability of the slope areas can
be characterized as good. Due to the slight gradient of the slope area and overall good
stability, the sloped area of the site does not present a geologic hazard to the site or
surrounding areas.
Erosion Hazard
With respect to erosion hazard areas, the referenced section of the Renton Code defines
erosion hazards as follows:
• Low Erosion Hazard: Areas with soils characterized by the Natural Resource
Conservation Service as having slight or moderate erosion potential, and that slope less
than 15 percent.
• High Erosion Hazard: Areas with soils characterized by the Natural Resource
Conservation Service as having severe or very severe erosion potential, and that slope
more steeply than 15 percent.
The site soils are classified by the NRCS Soil Survey as Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, 6 to
15 percent slopes. This soil demonstrates slow to medium runoff and presents a moderate
erosion hazard. The subject site would be classified as a low erosion hazard and would have a
moderate susceptibility to erosion, in our opinion. In our opinion, the planned development will
not increase the erosion hazard at the site, provided appropriate Best Management Practices
are implemented during the earthwork and development activities. General guidelines for
erosion control are provided in the Site Preparation and Earthwork section of this study.
Coal Mine Hazard
With respect to coal mine hazard areas, the referenced section of the Renton Code defines coal
mine hazards as follows:
• Low Coal Mine Hazards: Areas with no known mine workings and no predicted
subsidence. While no mines are known in these areas, undocumented mining is known
to have occurred.
• Medium Coal Mine Hazards: Areas where mine workings are deeper than 200 feet for
steeply dipping seams, or deeper than 15 times the thickness of the seam or workings
for gently dipping seams. These areas may be affected by subsidence.
• High Coal Mine Hazards: Areas with abandoned and improperly sealed mine openings
and areas underlain by mine workings shallower than 200 feet in depth for steeply
dipping seams, or shallower than 15 times the thickness of the seam or workings for
gently dipping seams. These areas may be affected by collapse or other subsidence.
earth Solutions rm, LLC
Caliber Real Estate
October 21, 2013
ES-3026
Page 6
Based on review of the referenced Coal Mine Hazard Areas map, the southerly margins of the
property is within an unclassified zone. The site would be classified as a low coal mine hazard
and would present a low risk of subsidence or other coal mine hazards, in our opinion. Signs of
coal mines, if observed during construction, should be addressed appropriately.
Analysis of Proposal
The planned development activity will involve grading and construction of a four or five
residential lot development with associated improvements adjacent to the steep slope area to
the west. The proposed development activity will include an access roadway through an
isolated sensitive slope area. As previously described, the on-site slopes exhibit good stability
and there is no gradient of 40 percent or greater on-site or adjacent to the site. The proposed
development activity is feasible in our opinion, and will not decrease stability of the site or
surrounding properties. In our opinion, the site presents a low coal mine hazard, however,
signs of coal mines observed during construction should be addressed appropriately. The
project designs must comply with the City of Renton Critical Areas Regulations.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
In our opinion, construction of the proposed single-family residential structures and related
stormwater and infrastructure improvements at this site is feasible from a geotechnical
standpoint. In our opinion, the proposed structures can be supported on conventional
continuous and spread footing foundations bearing on competent native soils, re-compacted
native soils, or structural fill. Slab-on-grade floors should be supported on dense native soil, re-
compacted native soil, or structural fill. Competent soils suitable for support of foundations
should be encountered at depths of between two to five feet below existing grades across the
majority of the site. Where existing fill, loose or unsuitable soil conditions are exposed at
foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or
overexcavation and replacement with a suitable structural fill material will be necessary.
Organic material exposed at subgrade elevations must be removed below design elevation and
grades restored with structural fill. Recommendations for foundation design, site preparation,
drainage, and other pertinent geotechnical recommendations are provided in the following
sections of this study.
This study has been prepared for the exclusive use of Caliber Real Estate and their
representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This study has been prepared in
a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the
profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area.
Site Preparation and Earthwork
Site preparation activities will include: removing existing structures, clearing activities and
installing temporary erosion control measures. Restoring possible voids resulting from existing
foundation (or basement area) structures may also be necessary as part of site preparation.
Earth Solutions NW, LLC
Caliber Real Estate
October21,2013
Site Stripping Recommendations
ES-3026
Page 7
Stripping will likely be limited to about 6 to 12 inches. Topsoil and organic-rich soil is not
suitable for foundation support, nor is it suitable for use as structural fill. Topsoil or organic-rich
soil can be used in non-structural areas if desired. The geotechnical engineer should observe
stripping operations to confirm the necessary stripping depth. Care should be taken to avoid
over-stripping.
Temporary Erosion Control
Temporary construction entrances and drive lanes, consisting of at least 12 inches of quarry
spalls can be considered in order to minimize off-site soil tracking and to provide a stable
access entrance surface. Erosion control measures should consist of silt fencing placed along
the edge of the site. Soil stockpiles should be covered or otherwise protected to reduce soil
erosion. Temporary sedimentation ponds or other approaches for controlling surface water
runoff should be in place prior to beginning significant earthwork activities.
In-situ Soils
The soils encountered throughout the majority of the test sites have a high sensitivity to
moisture and were generally in a moist to wet condition at the time of the exploration (October
2013). In general, soils encountered during site excavations that are excessively over the
optimum moisture content will require aeration or treatment prior to placement and compaction.
Conversely, soils that are substantially below the optimum moisture content will require
moisture conditioning through the addition of water prior to use as structural fill. If the in-situ
soils are determined to not be suitable for use as structural fill, then use of a suitable imported
soil may be necessary.
Wet Season Grading
If grading takes place during the wetter winter or spring months, a contingency in the project
budget should be included to allow for possible export of native soil and/or existing fill and
import of structural fill as described below.
Imported Soils
Imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with
a moisture content that is at or near the optimum level. During wet weather conditions,
imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with
a fines content of 5 percent or less defined as the percent paSSing the #200 sieve, based on the
minus three-quarter inch fraction.
Earth Solutions ~, LLC
Caliber Real Estate
October 21,2013
Building and Pavement Subgrade Preparation
ES-3026
Page 8
Subgrade conditions expected to be exposed throughout the majority of the proposed building
and pavement areas will likely be comprised of native sandy silt and silty sand soils. The soils
exposed throughout subgrade areas should be confirmed to be firm and unyielding prior to
constructing the foundation, slab, and pavement elements. The subgrade throughout
pavement areas should be compacted as necessary and exhibit a firm and unyielding condition
when subjected to proofrolling with a loaded dump truck. Structural fill soils placed throughout
foundation, slab, and pavement areas should be placed over a firm base. Loose or otherwise
unsuitable areas of native soil exposed at subgrade elevations should be compacted to
structural fill requirements or overexcavated and replaced with a suitable structural fill material.
Where structural fill soils are used to construct foundation subgrade areas, the soil should be
compacted to the requirements of structural fill described in the following section. Foundation
subgrade areas should be protected from disturbance, construction traffic, and excessive
moisture. Where instability develops below structural fill areas, use of a woven geotextile below
the structural fill areas may be required. Soils encountered near test pit TP-3 may need to be
stabilized with geotextile and/or crushed rock prior to placing any structural fill. A representative
of ESNW should observe excavations and structural fill placement in foundation, slab, and
pavement areas, and provide supplement recommendations, as necessary.
Structural Fill
Structural fill is defined as compacted soil placed in foundation, slab-on-grade, and roadway
areas. Fills placed to construct permanent slopes and throughout retaining wall and utility
trench backfill areas are also considered structural fill. Soils placed in structural areas should
be placed in loose lifts of 12 inches or less and compacted to a relative compaction of 90
percent, based on the laboratory maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor
Method (ASTM D-1557). For soil placed in utility trenches underlying structural areas
compaction requirements are dictated by the local city, county or utility district, and in general
are specified as 95 percent relative compaction. Soil placed throughout foundation subgrade
areas as well as the upper 12 inches of slab-on-grade and pavement area subgrade should
also be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 95 percent.
Earth Solutions NW, LLC
Caliber Real Estate
October 21, 2013
Excavations and Slopes
ES-3026
Page 9
The Federal Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Washington
Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA) provide soil classification in terms of temporary slope
inclinations. Based on the soil conditions encountered at the test pit locations, the weathered
native soils encountered in the upper approximately eight feet of the test pit locations and
where fill and/or groundwater seepage is exposed are classified as Type C by OSHAIWISHA.
Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type C soils must be sloped no steeper than
1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical). Medium dense to dense native soils encountered below
approximately eight feet where no groundwater seepage is exposed would be classified as
Type B by OSHAIWISHA. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type B soils must be
sloped no steeper than 1 H: 1V. Dense, unweathered glacial till soils would be classified as
Type A by OSHAIWISHA. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type A soils must be
sloped no steeper than O. 75H: 1V. The presence of perched groundwater may cause caving of
the temporary slopes due to hydrostatic pressure. ESNW should observe site excavations to
confirm the soil type and allowable slope inclination are appropriate for the soil exposed by the
excavation. If the recommended temporary slope inclination cannot be achieved, temporary
shoring may be necessary to support excavations.
Permanent slopes should maintain a gradient of 2H:1V, or flatter, and should be planted with
vegetation to enhance stability and to minimize erosion. A representative of ESNW should
observe temporary and permanent slopes to confirm the slope inclinations are suitable for the
exposed soil conditions, and to provide additional excavation and slope recommendations, as
necessary.
Foundations
Based on the results of our study, the proposed single-family residential structures can be
supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on competent native soils,
re-compacted native soils, or structural fill. Based on the soil conditions encountered at the test
sites, competent native soils suitable for support of foundations should be encountered at
depths of between about two to five feet below existing grades. Where loose or unsuitable soil
conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the
specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill will be
necessary. Organic material exposed at foundation subgrade elevations must be removed and
grades restored with structural fill.
Provided foundations will be supported as described above, the following parameters can be
used for design of new foundations:
• Allowable soil bearing capacity 2,500 psf
• Passive earth pressure 350 pcf (equivalent fluid)
• Coefficient of friction 0.4
Earth Solutions rm, LLC
Caliber Real Estate
October 21, 2013
ES-3026
Page 10
A one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can be assumed for short-term wind
and seismic loading conditions. The above passive pressure and friction values include a
factor-of-safetyof 1.5.
With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch and differential
settlement of about one-half inch is anticipated. The majority of the settlements should occur
during construction, as dead loads are applied.
Seismic Design Considerations
The 2009 International Building Code specifies several soil profiles that are used as a basis for
seismic design of structures. If the project will be permitted using the 2009 IBC, based on the
soil conditions observed at the test sites, Site Class D, from table 1613.5.2, should be used for
design.
The 2012 IBC recognizes ASCE for seismic site class definitions. If the project will be permitted
under the 2012 IBC, in accordance with Table 20.3-1 of ASCE, Minimum Design Loads for
Buildings and Other Structures, Site Class D, should be used for design.
In our opinion, liquefaction susceptibility at this site is low. The relative density of the site soils
and the absence of a uniform, shallow groundwater table are the primary bases for this
deSignation.
Slab-an-Grade Floors
Slab-an-grade floors constructed at this site should be supported on a firm and unyielding
subgrade. Where feasible, the existing native soils exposed at the slab-an-grade subgrade
level can be compacted in place to the specifications of structural fill. Unstable or yielding
areas of the subgrade should be recompacted or overexcavated and replaced with structural fill
prior to construction of the slab. A capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free
draining crushed rock or gravel should be placed below the slab. The free draining material
should have a fines content of 5 percent or less (percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the
minus three-quarter inch fraction). In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, installation of a
vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. If a vapor barrier is to be utilized it should
be a material specifically designed for use as a vapor barrier and should be installed in
accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
Retaining Walls
Retaining walls must be designed to resist earth pressures and applicable surcharge loads.
The following parameters can be. used for retaining wall design:
E~rth Solutions NW, LLC
Caliber Real Estate
October 21, 2013
• Active earth pressure (yielding condition)
• At-rest earth pressure (restrained condition)
• Traffic surcharge for passenger vehicles
(where applicable)
• Passive earth pressure
• Coefficient of friction
• Seismic surcharge (yielding condition)
35 pcf (equivalent fluid)
50 pcf
70 psf (rectangular distribution)
350 pcf (equivalent fluid)
0.4
ES-3026
Page 11
6H (where H equals retained height)
Additional surcharge loading from adjacent foundations, sloped backfill, or other loads should
be included in the retaining wall design. Drainage should be provided behind retaining walls
such that hydrostatic pressures do not develop. If drainage is not provided, hydrostatic
pressures should be included in the wall design.
Retaining walls should be backfilled with free draining material that extends along the height of
the wall, and a distance of at least 18 inches behind the wall. The upper one foot of the wall
backfill can consist of a less permeable soil, if desired. A perforated drain pipe should be
placed along the base of the wall, and connected to an approved discharge location. A typical
retaining wall drainage detail is provided on Plate 3.
Drainage
Perched groundwater should be anticipated in site excavations. Temporary measures to
control surface water runoff and groundwater during construction would likely involve
interceptor trenches and sumps. Interceptor trenches will likely be necessary in the vicinity of
test pit TP-3 (and possibly throughout other locations). ESNW should be consulted during
preliminary grading to identify areas of seepage and to provide recommendations to reduce the
potential for instability related to seepage effects.
In our opinion, foundation drains should be installed along perimeter footings of the buildings.
A typical foundation drain detail is provided as Plate 4.
Utility Support and Trench Backfill
In our opinion, the soils anticipated to be exposed in utility excavations should generally be
suitable for support of utilities. Existing fill, organic or highly compressible soils encountered in
the trench excavations should not be used for supporting utilities. The native soils are moisture
sensitive and will therefore be difficult to use as structural trench backfill. Moisture conditioning
of the soils will likely be necessary prior to use as structural backfill. Utility trench backfill
should be placed and compacted to 95 percent of the modified proctor, or to the applicable city
or utility district specifications.
Earth Solutions NW, llC
Caliber Real Estate
October 21, 2013
Pavement Sections
ES-3026
Page 12
The performance of site pavements is largely related to the condition of the underlying
subgrade. To ensure adequate pavement performance, the subgrade should be in a firm and
unyielding condition when subjected to proofrolling with a loaded dump truck. Structural fill in
pavement areas should be compacted to the specifications detailed in the Site Preparation and
Earthwork section of this report. It is possible that soft, wet, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade
areas may still exist after base grading activities. Areas of unsuitable or yielding subgrade
conditions may require remedial measures such as overexcavation and thicker crushed rock or
structural fill sections prior to pavement. Cement treatment of the subgrade soil can also be
considered for stabilizing pavement subgrade areas.
For relatively lightly loaded pavements subjected to automobiles and occasional truck traffic,
the following sections can be considered:
• Two inches of hot mix asphalt (HMA) placed over four inches of crushed rock base
(CRB), or;
• Two inches of HMA placed over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB).
The HMA, ATB and CRB materials should conform to WSDOT specifications.
LIMITATIONS
The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are
professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members
in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not
expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test
locations may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate
the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered.
Additional Services
ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final design with respect to the geotechnical
recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and
consultation services during construction.
Earth Solutions NW, LLC
_~I
~'r'f.-'
ro~!l"
~
" ,. l ,. ~
Reference:
~
"
~
!
,
~
!
, .' !
'~
;T
King County, Washington
Map 656
By The Thomas Guide
Rand McNally
32nd Edition
..
NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be
responsible for any sUbsequent misinterpretation of the infonma!on
resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate,
Drwn. GLS
Checked HTW
Vicinity Map
Talbot Road Short Plat
Renton, Washington
Date 1 0/1 0/2013 Proj. No.
Date Oct. 2013 Plate
3026
1
I
_L I I I r------------------------1--
I -L! J I
JTP-3 I TP-2 j-I
2 I I
3
TP-4J -o-
J
1
4
Tract "A"
Detention Pond
i-- ------_I-
I I
I
I
I
)--L
/ '-----" I
.u:i
J
-0-
TP-1J 5
I ;1 ",,-I : :----i i -------/ ,,-___ L__ !
. ___________________________ J ___ _
I LEGEND
I
ITP-1-t-APproXimate Location of
ESNW Test Pit, Proj. No.
ES-3026, Oct. 2013
r---l
I I Subject Site
---"
2 Proposed Numbers
r:'-'" ~ Wetland Area L> "~~ (Delineated By Others)
NOTE: The graphics shown on this plate are not intended for design
purposes or precise scale measurements, but only to illustrate the
approximate test locations relative to the approximate locations of
existing and I or proposed site features. The information illustrated
is largely based on data provided by the client at the time of our
study. ESNW cannot be responsible for subsequent design changes
or interpretation of the data by others.
NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color. ESNW cannot be
responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information
resulting from black & white reproductions of this plate.
1 "=50'
o 100 ~~~~
Test Pit Location Plan
Talbot Road Short Plat
Renton, Washington
Drwn. GLS Date 1 0/1 0/2013 Proj. No. 3026
Checked HTW Date Oct. 2013 Plate 2
18" Min.
0<> °0 <> <>
0° 0 0° .{) '" /'"\ <> 0 0
o 0",0 Od.,) 0° 0°0 0"'0 <> 0 OOOOOCI
00 0 0 0 <> <> 0 <>
o 0 0 o 0 0 0° <> <:> 0 00
o 0 <> <> 00 <> 0 <>
"" 0° <> 00() <> ~ °0 : 0 6 <>
00 0 '" 0 <>
On ",0", 000
<> 0 is 0 <> 0 <> c-= <>
o 0 00 <>" 0 0 0 <>
" 00 0 <> 00 0 0 <> '" (, <> 0 o 000 00 00 og
00000000°000
000 Q cO 0
0 0 0 0°0 <> <:> '"
<> <:> '" '" 0 0 0" °0 °0
0" 0 00" '" 0 CJ
<> 0 <> °0 <> <> 05 c '" <>" 0 <> "<> °0 <> <> 5
<> Q 0 0<> <:> 0 Co °0 <>°0 <>
°ooooooQon'g
c °0 " I:r' 0 00 0 <> 0 <> 0 <>
<> 0 0 0 00
<> 0 00" <> <> Do
o 0 <> 0 <> <>
000 c 0 00 0 <> 0 6' <> o 8 <:> 0 0 0 °0 °0
NOTES:
• Free Draining Backfill should consist
of soil having less than 5 percent fines.
Percent passing #4 should be 25 to
75 percent.
Structural
Fill
Perforated Drain Pipe
(Surround In Drain Rock)
• Sheet Drain may be feasible in lieu
of Free Draining Backfill, per ESNW
recommendations.
SCHEMATIC ONLY -NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
• Drain Pipe should consist of perforated,
rigid PVC Pipe surrounded with 1"
Drain Rock.
LEGEND:
Free Draining Structural Backfill
1 inch Drain Rock RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL
Talbot Road Short Plat
Renton, Washington
GLS Date 1 0/1 0/2013 Proj. No. 3026
Checked HTW Date Oct. 2013 Plate 3
Slope .. · .... . · .... . · . . . .. . . · .... . · .... .
,', .... ' ...... . · . . . . . . . . . . . . · ... , . .'
2" (Min.)
Perforated Rigid Drain Pipe
(Surround with 1" Rock)
NOTES:
• Do NOT tie roof downspouts
to Footing Drain.
• Surface Seal to consist of
12" of less permeable, suitable
soil. Slope away from building.
LEGEND:
F8l Surface Seal; native soil or tJlilij other low permeability material.
1" Drain Rock
SCHEMATIC ONLY -NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
Drwn. GLS
FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL
Talbot Road Short Plat
Renton, Washington
Date 10/10/2013 Proj. No. 3026
Checked HTW Date Oct. 2013 Plate 4
Appendix A
Subsurface Exploration
ES·3026
The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating a total of four test pits across
accessible portions of the property. The subsurface exploration was completed in October
2013. The approximate test pit locations are illustrated on Plate 2 of this report. Logs of the
test pits are provided in this Appendix.
Earth Solutions NW, LLC
Earth Solutions NWllC
SOil CLASSIFICATION CHART
MAJOR DIVISIONS TYPICAL
DESCRIPTIONS
COARSE
GRAINED
SOILS
MORE THAN 50%
OF MATERIAL IS
LARGER TIiAN
NO. 200 SIEVE
SIZE
FINE
GRAINED
SOILS
MORE TIiAN 50%
OF MATERIAL IS
SMALLER THAN
NO, 200 SIEVE
SIZE
GRAVEL
AND
GRAVELLY
SOILS
MORE THAN 50%
OF COARSE
FRACTION
RETAINED ON NO.
4 SIEVE
SAND
AND
SANDY
SOILS
CLEAN
GRAVELS
(LITTLE OR NO FINES)
GRAVELS WITH
FINES
(APPRECIABLE
AMOUNT OF FINES)
CLEAN SANDS
(UTTlE OR NO FINES)
SANDS WITH
MORE THAN 50% FINES
OF COARSE
FRACTION
PASSING ON NO.
4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE
SILTS
AND
CLAYS
SILTS
AND
CLAYS
AMOUNT OF FINES)
uaUIDUMIT
LESS THAN 50
UQUIDLlMIT
GREATER THAN 50
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
GW
GP
GM
GC
SW
SP
8M
SC
ML
OL
MH
CH
OH
PT
WEll-GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEl-
SAND MIXTURES, UTILE OR NO
FINES
POORLY-GRAOED GRAVELS,
GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES, LrInE
ORNOANES
SILTY GRAVELS. GRAVEL -SAND-
SILT MIXTURES
CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-
CLAY MIXTURES
WEUl-GRADED SANDS, GRAVEllY
SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES
POORLY-GRADED SANDS,
GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO
FINES
SILTY SANDS, SAND -SILT
MIXTURES
CLAYEY SANDS, SAND -CLAY
MIXTURES
INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY ANE
SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR
CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY
SILTS Willi SLIGHT PLASTICITY
ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC
SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY
INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR
DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR
SILTY SOILS
INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH
PLASTICITY
ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO
HIGH PlASTICITY. ORGANIC SILTS
PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH
HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS
DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications.
The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature
of the material presented in the attached logs.
Earth Solutions NW
1805-13Sth Place N.E., Suite 201
Bellevue, Washington 98005
Telephone: 425-449-4704
Fax: 425-449-4711
CLIENT Caliber Real Estate
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE STARTED 10/7113 COMPLETED _1"'0""17'-/1"'3'--__
EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR -'N"W"'-'E"x"'ca"'v"'a"'tin"'g'--______ _
EXCAVATION METHOD _____________ _
LOGGED BY _HL!TW-'-'.! ____ _ CHECKED BY 2H..,T"'W'---__
NOTES 4" Crushed Rock
TESTS
ML
MC: 19.10%
ML -mottled color
-minor seepage
MC: 15.50%
TEST PIT NUMBER TPo1
PROJECT NAME Talbot Road Short Plat
PROJECT LOCATION
PAGE 1 OF 1
GROUND ELEVATION _1"S"'3C'ft'---__
GROUND WATER LEVELS:
TEST PIT SIZE ____ _
AT TIME OF EXCAVATION -= __________ _
AT END OF EXCAVATION -='--__________ _
AFTER EXCAVATION --
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
• medium dense, moist to wet
MC: 14.10% -becomes gray, dense
SM
-cemented
MC: 12.50%
i seepage encountered
feet during excavation.
Bottom oftest pit at 10.0 feet.
M
is
~
::;
Cl
uJ
" !z
G
~
Cl
~ M
~ ~
~
1=
J:
'" ~ ~
Z
W "
•
Earth Solutions NW
1805 -136th Place N.E" Suite 201
Bellevue, Washington 98005
Telephone: 425-449-4704
Fax: 425-449-4711
CliENT Caliber Real Estate, _____________ _
PROJECT NUMBER 3026
DATE STARTED _1,,0"'f7"-/1...,3'-__ _ COMPLETED _1"0,,,f7cc/1,,3<-__
EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR ""N"'W"'-'Eo<>x"'ca"'v"'a .... tin"'g'--______ _
EXCAVATION METHOD _____________ _
LOGGED BY .lHlJTWC!L ____ _ CHECKED BY ""HlJTW'-"'-__ _
NOTES Depth oITopsol1 & Sod 6": light ivy
w a. ()
:I: ~ffi ui
h:2 w'" U I(!)
TESTS 0.0 w-.... ::;; ui ~ .... 0 a.'" ::j ::;;z (!)
~
° TPSL '-' ' 0.5 TOPSOILto 6"
TEST PIT NUMBER TP·2
PROJECT NAME Talbot Road Short Plat
PROJECT LOCATION Renton, Washington
PAGE 1 OF 1
GROUND ELEVATION -'1""74'-'ft'---__
GROUND WATER LEVELS:
TEST PIT SIZE _____ _
AT TIME OF EXCAVATION ..:-;:;--___ . _______ _
AT END OF EXCAVATION .;:--=-__________ _
AFTER EXCAVATION --
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
173.5
Brown sandy SILT with gravel, loose to medium dense, moist to wet
MC = 19.90% ML
"
MC= 14,60%
-becomes dark gray
-fractured texture
10.0 164.0
.
Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered
at 6,0 feet dunng excavation,
Bottom of test pH at 10,0 feet.
Earth Solulions NW
1805 -136th Place N.E., SuHe 201
Bellevue, Washington 98005
Telephone: 425-449-4704
TEST PIT NUMBER TP~3
Fax: 425-449-4711
CLIENT Caliber Real Estate
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE STARTED 1017113 COMPLETED 1017113
EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating,~ ______ ~
PROJECT NAME _ Talbot Road Short Plat
PROJECT LOCATION
GROUND ELEVATION -,1",64,,-,-,11 __ _ TEST PIT SIZE
GROUND WATER LEVELS:
PAGE 1 OF 1
EXCAVATION METHOD _____________ _ AT TIME OF EXCAVATION -='--__________ _
LOGGED BY ..JHCLTWL!L ____ _ CHECKED BY 2HTWl!..!.L-__ _ AT END OF EXCAVATION -= ___________ ~
NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 12": brambles AFTER EXCAVATION --
w
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
"-U :z: ~ffi CIi
Ii=-w al t.i s:~
TESTS "-0 w--'::E CIi ili-' Cl "-::J ;:; :1z ~
C)j
MC =39.40%
amoderate fine organics
-moderate seepage
MC =22.30%
ML
-mottled color
MC = 37.30% Test pit terminated at ·10,-0 feet grade. Groundwater seepage
at 4,5 during excavation. .1
Bottom oftest.p~.at 10.0 feet
b
" !!l
!z a
~
~
~
t
15
~
1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201
Bellevue, Washington 98005
•
Earth Solutions NW TEST PIT NUMBER TP-4
PAGE 1 OF 1
Telephone: 425-449-4704
Fax: 425-449-4711
CLIENT Caliber Real Estate PROJECT NAME Talbot Road Short Plat
I-'P,:,R~O~J~E=C~T~N~U~M~8:,E=R~3~0~2",6==============~P~R::::O~JE=:C~T~LO~C~A~ON Renton, Washington
DATE STARTED -.J1",0",rr!.!/l",3 __ _ COMPLETED _1..,.O",rrl-ll",3: __ _ GROUND ELEVATION -.J1",6",5",ft __ _ TEST PIT SIZE ___ . __ _
EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR NW Excavating GROUND WATER lEVELS:
EXCAVATION METHOD --' _____________ _ AT TIME OF EXCAVATION ...:-=--___________ _
LOGGED BY JH!JTW= ________ _ CHECKED BY -'.HTW='--____ _ AT END OF EXCAVATION -= ___________ _
NOTES Depth of Topsoil & Sod 6": iyy AFTER EXCAVATION
w
"-
~ .. ~ffi w m
w~ -'::0
0 "-::> ::oz
TESTS
O!i
0
-
MC -29.70%
MC -16.80%
MC -16.00%
en U ti :E(!)
c6 ~o :i 0::-'
(!)
'-PSL'-" "0.5
ML III '.0
PT ~'I, ,i
-1.5
ML
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
TOPSOIL to 6" '64.5
Brown sandy SILT, loose, wet 164.0
Black PEAT, Ve"l:::7:loo=se=-,-:dc:a=m=p-------------------'"'6"'3."l5
Brown sandy SILT, medium dense, mofst to wet
-mottled color
-minor seepage
10.0 155.0
Test-pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater seepage encountered
at 4.5 feet during excavation.
Bottom oftest pit at 10.0 feet.
~,L-_~ __ L-______ L-~ __ ~ ______________________________________________________________ ~
Appendix 8
Laboratory Test Results
ES-3026
Earth Solutions NW, LLC
.
·Ie .'. GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION , ,:. I': ' Earth Solutions NW ~~~\';'~--I i,iJ I"I!. 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 ,
Bellevue, WA 98005 •. ",., "l-::, "", ~ Telephone: 425·284·3300 ~''--
CLIENT Caliber Real Estate PROJECT NAME Talbot Road Short Plat .'--
PROJECT NUMBER ES·3026 PROJECT LOCATION Renton
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER
6 4 3 2 1.5 1 " 112318 3 ft. 6 8,lQ 1416 20 3C, 40 5060 100140200
100 I I I I' II ..
~ I
95 "-
90
85 "'" -~ \
80
75 \
70 f'. \
65 \ ... ~ :I:
(!) 60 ~ ~' >-55
"' \ 0:
UJ 50 z \ u: ... 45 z
UJ
tl 40 0:
UJ
0-
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
COBBLES
GRAVEL SAND SILTORCLAY coarse I fine coarse I medium I fine
Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu
0 TP·1 7.0ft. Gray Silty SAND, SM
181 Tp·2 8.0ft. Dark Gray SILT, ML ,
" TP-4 3.0ft. Brown Sandy SILT, ML
~
Specimen Identification 0100 060 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay
. 0 TP·1 7.Oft . 19 0.164 2.7 60.1 37.2
0 TP·2 8.Oft. 4.75 0.0 2.6 97.4 ,;,
"'" TP-4 3.0ft. 19 0.126 7.4 37.0 55.7 ~
" ,.
~
•
EMAIL ONLY
EMAIL ONLY
Report Distribution
ES-3026
Caliber Real Estate
19125 North Creek Parkway, Suite 123
Bothell, Washington 98011
Attention: Mr. David Albers
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 -53'd Avenue South, Suite 100
Seattle, Washington 98188
Attention: Mr. Greg Diener
Earth Solutions NW, LLC
TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SHORT PLAT
K. C. Parcel No. 3023059071
3340 Talbot Road South
Renton, Washington
Preliminary Technical Information Report
Prepared for:
CALIBER REAL ESTATE
19125 North Creek Parkway, Suite 123
Bothell, W A 98011
Phone: (206) 683-8821
Prepared By:
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 53 rd Ave S. , Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431-7970
Fax: (206) 388-1648
Jingsong Feng, P.E.
RECEIVED
JAN 292014
CITY OF R
PlANNIN ENTON
GDIVISION
September 26, 2013 PED Job No. 13053
Technical Information Report for Talbot Road South Short Plat 912612013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Project Overview ................................................................................................................... 1
II. Off-Site Analysis ................................................................................................................... 1
III. Core and Special Requirements ............................................................................................. 2
IV. Flow Control and Water Quality Analysis and Design ........................................................ .4
V. Conveyance System Analysis ................................................................................................ 7
IV. Erosion I Sedimentation Control Design ............................................................................... 7
APPENDIX A
• Site Data Notes
• KCRTS Printouts
• KCSWDM Figure 3 .2.2.A -Rainfall Regions and Scale Factors
• City of Renton Zoning Map
• King County iMAP Aerial Photo Map with 5' contours
• City of Renton Soils Map and classification descriptions
• KCSWDM Table 3.2.2.B -Equivalence Between Soil Types Classified by U.S. Soil
Conservation Service and King County Runoff Time Series (KCRTS)
• Technical Information Report (TIR) Worksheet
Appendix B
• Level I Off-Site Analysis, by Pacific Engineering Design, LLC, dated September 23,
2013
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC Pagei
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\T1R\13053 TalBotS PreIiminaryTIR.doc
Technical Information Report/or Talbot Road South Short Plat 912612013
I. Project Overview
Site Location and Project Proposal
The 5 single family lots Talbot Road South Short Plat project is proposed to be constructed on a
site totaling 1.34 acres. The site is located in Section 30, Township 23, Range 5 E, W.M. in City
of Renton. More specifically the site is located south of the intersection of South 32 nd Place and
Talbot Road South. The King County Parcel Number is 3023059071. The site is accessed from
Talbot Road South. The site is within the R-8 residential zone in City of Renton.
Existing Site Conditions
The site slopes down in a southwesterly direction. The upper rectangular portion of the site has
average overall slope of approximately 5%. The City of Renton Steep slope map shows a small
area with 15% to 25% slopes in the middle portion of the site which corresponds to some 2' to 6'
high rockeries around the existing residence. The upper portion ofthe access road has an
average slope of8.5%, the lower portion of the access road has an average slope of 16 to 20%.
The site is currently developed as a single family residence and the site is mostly lawn or pasture
with trees scattered across the property and along the property lines. The proposed project will
divide the site into 5 single family parcels, a joint use driveway and utility tract, a sensitive area
tract and a stormwater detention water quality treatment tract.
Proposed Detention and Water Quality Facility
The development is proposing to install a new combined detention/wet vault will be installed in a
separate tract for the upper portion ofthe site and discharge into the existing 18 inch storm line
in the southern adjacent property. Another combined detention/wet vault will be installed near
the entrance of the access road to treat runoff from the access road. Basic Water Quality
Treatment and Conservation Flow Control with forest existing condition (Level 2 Flow Control)
are required for these facilities.
II. Off-Site Analysis
Pacific Engineering Desigu, LLC performed a Level I off-site drainage study for this project.
See the attached reports in the Appendix.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC Page 1
R;\13053 Talbot Road South\TIR\13053 TalBotS PreliminaryTlR.doc
Technical In/ormation Report/or Talbot Road South Short Plat 912612013
III. Core and Special Requirements
CORE REQUIREMENTS -SECTION 1.2 OF KCSWDM
1.2.1 CORE REQUIREMENT #1: Discharge at the Natural Location
Treated release from the upper combined detention/wet vault will be discharged to an 18" stonn
line in the southern adjacent property that drains to the Talbot Road South stonn conveyance
system. Treated release from the lower combined detention/wet vault will be discharged to the
stonn conveyance system within Talbot Road South.
1.2.2 CORE REQUIREMENT #2: Off-site Analysis
This core requirement has been addressed elsewhere in this preliminary report. Please refer to
the Off-Site Analysis Section (Section II).
1.2.3. CORE REQUIREMENT #3: Flow Control
On-site flow control will be provided by two on-site combined detention/wet vaults designed to
Conservation Flow Control (Level 2) using KCRTS analysis. One is for the upper portion of the
site with the 5 single family lots and the other is for the access road. Per City of Renton Flow
Control Map, Flow Control Duration Standard (Forest Conditions) is required in the project area.
1.2.4 CORE REQUIREMENT #4: Conveyance System
Site runoff will be collected by means of yard drains, catch basins and roof drains. Collected
runoffwill be conveyed to the detention facilities within pipelines designed to 25-year peak
flows and checked for flooding conditions at the 100 year event.
1.2.5 CORE REQUIREMENT #5: Erosion and Sediment Control
During construction of the infrastructure for the Talbot Road South Short Plat, temporary erosion
control methods will be implemented to prevent sedimentation and erosion using those methods
as outlined in Section 1.2.5.1 of the KCSWDM. The excavation for the upper detention facility
will be used as a temporary erosion and sediment control pond during the construction period.
1.2.6 CORE REQUIREMENT #6: Maintenance and Operations
This requirement will be fulfilled by the property owner until bonds have been released and
public drainage system(s) have been conveyed to the City of Renton.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\TIR\13053 TalBotS PreliminaryTIR.doc
Page 2
Technical Information Reportfor Talbot Road South Short Plat 912612013
1.2.7 CORE REQUIREMENT #7: Financial Guarantees and Liability
Bonds and insurance in accordance with City of Renton requirements will be provided by or at
the behest of the owner during site construction and until the drainage facilities in public street
rights-of-way have been accepted by the City of Renton for ownership.
1.2.8 CORE REQUIREMENT #8: Water Quality
Because this development is a single family residential development, per City of Renton
Amendments to the KCSWDM, Basic water quality treatment is required. Runoff from roof
drains will be tight lined directly to the conveyance system within the proposed road. Runoff
from driveways will drain to the street and will be picked up by the catch basins within the street
and conveyed to the combined detention/wet vaults. Two combined Detention/Wet vaults will
be constructed to provide the required Basic water quality treatment.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS -SECTION 1.3 OF KCSWDM
1.3.1 Special Requirement #1: Other Adopted Area Specific Requirements
Not applicable to this project.
1.3.2 Special Requirement #2: Flood Plain / Floodway Delineation
Not applicable to this project.
1.3.3 Special Requirement #3: Flood Protection Facilities
Not applicable to this project.
1.3.4 Special Requirement #4: Source Controls
Not applicable to this project.
1.3.5 Special Requirement #5: Oil Control
Not applicable to this project.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC Page 3
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\TIR\13053 TalBotS PreliminaryTIR.doc
Technical InJormation Report Jor Talbot Road South Short Plat 912612013
IV. Flow Control and Water Quality Analysis and Design
HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
The drainage analysis uses King County Runoff Time Series (KCRTS) software. A majority of
the on-site soils are (AgC) Alderwood Series, KCRTS Soil Group Till. The southwest comer of
the site has (AgD) soil, KCRTS Soil Group Till, in the approximate location of the proposed
detention and water quality facilities. The proposal is located in Sea-Tac rainfall region with a
scale factor of 1.0.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The developed area of the site encompasses approximately 1.30 acres after deducting 0.04 acre
of wetland buffer area in the sensitive area tract which will remain undisturbed and will not be
collect by the proposed drainage system. The pre-developed site conditions will be modeled as
Till Forest. The 1.30 acres onsite drainage basin will be divided into two sub-basins. The upper
basin includes 5 single family lots, the joint use driveway and the half cul-de-sac (1.00 acres).
The lower basin includes the new public access street up to the beginning of the half cul-de-sac
(0.3 acres).
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
The Talbot Road South Short Plat proposes 5 single family parcels, a public street (half street
improvement), a joint use driveway and utility tract, a sensitive area tract and a stormwater.
detentionIWQ tract.
For the upper portion of the site, the developed site will result in approximately 0.70 acres of
impervious surface.
Impervious area calculation for the upper portion of the site:
Total area ofthe 5 lots = 0.68 acres.
Impervious area in 5 lots, assume 75% impervious area per city zoning code = 0.51 acres.
Half cul-de-sac pavement and sidewalk = 0.11 acres.
Joint use driveway = 0.06 acres.
Vault access driveway = 0.02 acres.
Total impervious area = 0.70 acres
Flow control BMPs feasibility study:
Since there is not enough length of native vegetation path for full dispersion or basic dispersion,
these two methods are not suitable for this development. Geotechnical report shows that onsite
soil is sandy loam with groundwater seepage observed at about 4.5 to 6 feet below existing
ground at 4 test pits. The soil is not suitable for full infiltration and marginal for limited
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC Page 4
R:\]J053 Talbot Road South\TlR\13053 TalBotS PreliminaryTIR.doc
Technical Information Reportfor Talbot Road South Short Plat 912612013
infiltration. Since possibility of high ground water level is relative high in this site during winter,
infiltration is not suitable for this site. The only BMP used will be 10 linear feet of perforating
tight line in each lot (not count for any credits).
The remaining area, 0.30 acres, will be landscaped and is modeled as Till Grass.
For the lower portion of the site (approximately 449 feet of 30 feet wide public street right of
way), the developed site will result in approximately 0.26 acres of impervious surface (sidewalks
and road pavements). The remaining area, 0.04 acres, will be landscaped and is modeled as Till
Grass.
DETENTION ROUTING CALCULATIONS
Level 2 flow control (duration forest condition) standards are required for this project. The
facilities were first sized using the automatic method in the KCRTS software. The facilities were
then modified by adjusting the volume ofthe storage structure and the diameters and elevations
of the control structure orifices using the manual method in KCRTS. The facility matches the
peak discharge rates to the pre-developed peak runoffrates for the 2-and lO-year return periods
Comparing the pre-developed duration curve with the facility outflow duration curve the
maximum positive excursion at any point along the curve between 50-percent of the 2-year flow
and 50-year storm events does not exceed 10 percent.
Upper vault sizing:
The sizing analysis resulted in a vault with 13,677 cf. (50 feet long by 42 feet wide by 6.51 feet
deep) oflive storage. The vault has been configured to approximate the resulting calculations
taking into consideration the site topography, proposed road and lot locations, and other site
constraints.
A control structure with two orifices was designed to meet the peak rate and duration standards.
These calculations have been included in the Appendix.
Lower vault sizing:
The sizing analysis resulted in a vault with 4,800 cf. (60 feet long by 20 feet wide by 4 feet deep)
oflive storage. The vault has been configured to approximate the resulting calculations taking
into consideration the site topography, proposed road and lot locations, and other site constraints.
A control structure with three orifices was designed to meet the peak rate and duration standards.
These calculations have been included in the Appendix.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC Page 5
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\TIR\13053 TalBotS PreliminaryTlR.doc
Technical InJormation ReportJor Talbot Road South Short Plat 912612013
WATER QUALITY TREATMENT
This project is a single family residential development. Per City of Renton Surface Water
Design Manual, Basic water quality treatment is required. Two combined detention/wet vaults
will be used.
The upper vault:
Total impervious area Ai = 0.62 acres
Total pervious area Atg = 0.31 acres
Total drainage area = 0.93 acres
Atf= 0 acres
Ao = 0 acres
Required dead storage Vb = 3 * Vr
Vr = (0.9Ai + 0.25Atg + O.lAtf + O.OIAo)*R
= (0.9 * 0.7 + 0.25 * 0.30) * 43560 * 0.039
= 1,198 cf.
Vb=3 *Vr=3 * 1,198=3,594cf.
The proposed combined detention/wet vault will provide 4,200 cf. of dead storage (50 feet long x
21 feet wide x 4 feet deep). The vault will has two cells separated with baffle wall.
The lower vault:
Total impervious area Ai = 0.26 acres
Total pervious area Atg = 0.04 acres
Total drainage area = 0.30 acres
Atf= 0 acres
Ao = 0 acres
Required dead storage Vb = 3 * Vr
Vr = (0.9Ai + 0.25Atg + O.IAtf + O.OIAo)*R
= (0.9 * 0.26 + 0.25 * 0.04) * 43560 * 0.039
= 415 cf.
Vb=3 *Vr=3 *415= 1,245 cf.
The proposed combined detention/wet vault will provide 1,280 cf. of dead storage (16 feet long x
20 feet wide x 4 feet deep). Since the dead storage is less than 2,000 cf. the vault will be a single
cell vault.
Given the restrictions and topography ofthe site, a bio-filtration swale or bio-filtration filter are
not practicable options due to slopes on the site.
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC Page 6
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\TlR\13053 TalBotS Pre1iminaryTlR.doc
Technical Information Reportfor Talbot Road South Short Plat 912612013
V. Conveyance System Analysis
The system has been designed to convey the 25-year peak flows and checked for flooding
conditions at the 100-year event per the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
IV. Erosion I Sedimentation Control Design
Erosion and sedimentation control has been provided by utilizing BMPs selected from the 2005
King County Surface Water Design Manual and 2009 City of Renton Design and Construction
Standards. These BMPs include a sediment pond, silt fencing around the perimeter of the site,
construction safety fencing, interceptor v-ditches, rock check dams, plastic sheeting of
stockpiles, straw mulch, hydro-seeding, catch basin protection, and a rocked construction
entrance.
A Temporary Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan is included as part of the construction
document submittal detailing the means by which sediment and erosion control will be handled
during construction.
Pacific Engineering Design. LLC Page 7
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\TIR\13053 TalBotS PreliminaryTIR.doc
APPENDIX A
Talbot Road South Short Plat Site Data Notes:
Upper portion of the site
Pre-developed condition:
Area Unit
Total site area -1.04 Acres
Wet land and buffer area -0.04 Acres (not draining to the
proposed drainage
system)
Total drainage area = 1.00 Acres
Total impervious area -0.00 Acres
Total pervious area -1.00 Acres till forest)
Developed condition:
Impervious
Lot Area area
Impervious area calculation: (acres) (acres)
(assume max. 75%
impervious area per
Total areas in Lot 1 to Lot 5 = 0.68 0.51 city code)
Pavement and sidewalk in half
cul-de-sac 0.11
Joint use driveway 0.06
Detention vault access 0.02
Total impervious area 0.7
Pervious
area
(acres)
Total pervious area 0.30 till forest)
Total drainage area 1.00 acres)
Lower portion of the site
Pre-developed condition:
Total site area -0.3 Acres
Total drainage area -0.3 Acres
Total impervious area -o Acres
Total pervious area = 0.3 Acres till forest)
Developed condition:
Area Unit
Total drainage area -0.3 Acres
Total impervious area = 0.26 Acres
Total pervious area -0.04 Acres till grass)
Instructions:
Pondcalc Worksheet
1 Enter site information in the yellow highlighted cells
2 Verify no error message is displayed
3 Results are displayed in Green Box
'Note: pondcalc will not work for negative landcover conversions.
pondcalc does not handle existing EI or TG very well.
Disclaimer: This spreadsheet is provided without warranty of any kind. Use this spreadsheet
at your own risk. All facility sizes should be verified using KCRTS software.
Rainfall Region ST (either ST or LA see rainfall regions map)
Scale Factor: 1.00 ( 0.8 -1.2 see rainfall regions map)
FC Level: 2 ( 1, 2, or 3 see flow control app map)
Predeveloped Landcover Postdeveloped Adjusted Acres Error Messages
acres type acres converted cover
1 TF 1
a TP a
TG 0.3 0.3
EI 0.7 0.7
TF-till forest, TP -till pasture, TG -till grass, EI = effective impervious
Acreage Check:
gross
adjusted
post
1
1
UPPER VAULT
pre
1
1
preupper1. pks
pre-developed condition upper portion of the site
Total drainage area = 1.00 acres
Total impervlous area = 0.00 acres
Total pervious area = 1.00 acres (till
Rainfall region: Seattle
scale factor = 1.0
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time series File:preupper.tsf
project Location:Sea-Tac
forest)
---Annual peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Time of Peak --Peaks --Rank Return prob Flow Rate Rank
(CFS) (CFS) period
0.063 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.081 1 100.00 0.990
0.017 7 1/06/02 3:00 0.063 2 25.00 0.960
0.047 4 2/28/03 3:00 0.049 3 10.00 0.900
0.002 8 3/24/04 19:00 0.047 4 5.00 0.800
0.028 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.041 5 3.00 0.667
0.049 3 1/18/06 21:00 0.028 6 2.00 0.500
0.041 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.017 7 1.30 0.231
0.081 1 1/09/08 9:00 0.002 8 1.10 0.091
computed peaks 0.075 50.00 0.980
page 1
devupper1. pks
Developed condition upper portion of the site
Total draina~e area = 1.00 acres
Total impervlous area = 0.70 acres
Total pervious area = 0.30 acres (till grass)
Rainfall region: seattle
scale factor = 1.0
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:devupper.tsf
project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Flow Rate Rank Time of peak --peaks Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (CFS) Period
0.196 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.394 1 100.00 0.990
0.163 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.262 2 25.00 0.960
0.236 3 2/27 /03 7:00 0.236 3 10.00 0.900
0.180 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.216 4 5.00 0.800
0.216 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.209 5 3.00 0.667
0.209 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.196 6 2.00 0.500
0.262 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.180 7 1.30 0.231
0.394 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.163 8 1.10 0.091
computed Peaks 0.350 50.00 0.980
page 1
Retention/Detention Facility ( V\ffE-1Z 'vAV\L I)
Type of Facility: Detention Vault
Facility Length: 50.00 ft
Facility width: 42.00 ft
Facility Area: 2100. sq. ft
Effective Storage Depth: 6.45 ft
Stage 0 Elevation: 0.00 ft
Storage Volume: 13545. cu. ft
Riser Head: 6.45 ft
Riser Diameter: 12.00 inches
Number of orifices: 2
Full Head Pipe
Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter
(ft) (in) (CFS) (in)
1 0.00 0.50 0.017
2 3.90 0.88 0.034 4.0
Top Notch Weir: None
Outflow Rating curve: None
Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation
(ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs)
0.00 0.00 o. 0.000 0.000 0.00
0.01 0.01 21. 0.000 0.001 0.00
0.02 0.02 42. 0.001 0.001 0.00
0.03 0.03 63. 0.001 0.001 0.00
0.04 0.04 84. 0.002 0.001 0.00
0.05 0.05 105. 0.002 0.001 0.00
0.16 0.16 336. 0.008 0.003 0.00
0.27 0.27 567. 0.013 0.003 0.00
0.37 0.37 777. 0.018 0.004 0.00
0.48 0.48 1008. 0.023 0.005 0.00
0.59 0.59 1239. 0.028 0.005 0.00
0.70 0.70 1470. 0.034 0.006 0.00
0.81 0.81 1701. 0.039 0.006 0.00
0.92 0.92 1932. 0.044 0.007 0.00
1. 03 1. 03 2163. 0.050 0.007 0.00
1.14 1.14 2394. 0.055 0.007 0.00
1. 25 1. 25 2625. 0.060 0.008 0.00
1. 36 1.36 2856. 0.066 0.008 0.00
1.47 1. 47 3087. 0.071 0.008 0.00
1. 58 1. 58 3318. 0.076 0.009 0.00
1. 69 1. 69 3549. 0.081 0.009 0.00
1. 80 1. 80 3780. 0.087 0.009 0.00
1. 91 1. 91 4011. 0.092 0.009 0.00
2.01 2.01 4221. 0.097 0.010 0.00
2.12 2.12 4452. 0.102 0.010 0.00
2.23 2.23 4683. 0.108 0.010 0.00
2.34 2.34 4914. 0.113 0.010 0.00
2.45 2.45 5145. 0.118 0.011 0.00
2.56 2.56 5376. 0.123 0.011 0.00
2.67 2.67 5607. 0.129 0.011 0.00
2.78 2.78 5838. 0.134 0.011 0.00
2.89 2.89 6069. 0.139 0.012 0.00
3.00
3.11
3.22
3.33
3.44
3.55
3.65
3.76
3.87
3.90
3.91
3.92
3.93
3.94
3.95
3.96
3.97
4.08
4.19
4.30
4.41
4.52
4.63
4.74
4.85
4.96
5.07
5.18
5.29
5.39
5.50
5.61
5.72
5.83
5.94
6.05
6.16
6.27
6.38
6.45
6.55
6.65
6.75
6.85
6.95
7.05
7.15
7.25
7.35
7.45
7.55
7.65
7.75
7.85
7.95
8.05
8.15
3.00
3.11
3.22
3.33
3.44
3.55
3.65
3.76
3.87
3.90
3.91
3.92
3.93
3.94
3.95
3.96
3.97
4.08
4.19
4.30
4.41
4.52
4.63
4.74
4.85
4.96
5.07
5.18
5.29
5.39
5.50
5.61
5.72
5.83
5.94
6.05
6.16
6.27
6.38
6.45
6.55
6.65
6.75
6.85
6.95
7.05
7.15
7.25
7.35
7.45
7.55
7.65
7.75
7.85
7.95
8.05
8.15
6300.
653l.
6762.
6993.
7224.
7455.
7665.
7896.
8127.
8190.
8211.
8232.
8253.
8274.
8295.
8316.
8337.
8568.
8799.
9030.
9261.
9492.
9723.
9954.
10185.
10416.
10647.
10878.
11109.
11319.
11550.
1178l.
12012.
12243.
12474.
12705.
12936.
13167.
13398.
13545.
13755.
13965.
14175.
14385.
14595.
14805.
15015.
15225.
15435.
15645.
15855.
16065.
16275.
16485.
16695.
16905.
17115.
0.145
0.150
0.155
0.161
0.166
0.171
0.176
0.181
0.187
0.188
0.188
0.189
0.189
0.190
0.190
0.191
0.191
0.197
0.202
0.207
0.213
0.218
0.223
0.229
0.234
0.239
0.244
0.250
0.255
0.260
0.265
0.270
0.276
0.281
0.286
0.292
0.297
0.302
0.308
0.311
0.316
0.321
0.325
0.330
0.335
0.340
0.345
0.350
0.354
0.359
0.364
0.369
0.374
0.378
0.383
0.388
0.393
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.014
0.014
0.015
0.016
0.017
0.019
0.019
0.023
0.025
0.027
0.029
0.031
0.033
0.034
0.035
0.037
0.038
0.039
0.040
0.041
0.043
0.044
0.045
0.046
0.047
0.047
0.048
0.049
0.050
0.051
0.360
0.923
1.650
2.450
2.730
2.980
3.220
3.440
3.650
3.840
4.030
4.200
4.370
4.540
4.690
4.850
4.990
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.25 8.25 17325. 0.398 5.140 0.00
Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage
Target Calc Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft)
1 0.39 0.08 0.25 6.51 6.51 13677. 0.314
2 0.20 ******* 0.05 6.24 6.24 13111. 0.301
3 0.20 0.04 0.04 5.51 5.51 11561. 0.265
4 0.24 ******* 0.04 5.50 5.50 11548. 0.265
5 0.21 ******* 0.03 4.45 4.45 9339. o .2l4
6 0.12 0.03 0.02 3.94 3.94 8266. 0.190
7 0.16 ******* 0.01 3.73 3.73 7825. 0.180
8 0.18 ******* 0.01 2.59 2.59 5449. 0.125
----------------------------------
Route Time Series through Facility
Inflow Time Series File:devupper.tsf
Outflow Time Series File:rdoupper
Inflow/Outflow Analysis
Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.394 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.245 CFS at 10:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Peak Reservoir Stage: 6.51 Ft
peak Reservoir Elev: 6.51 Ft
Peak Reservoir Storage: 13677. Cu-Ft
0.314 Ac-Ft
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:rdoupper.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates---
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak
(CFS)
0.051 2 2/09/01 21:00
0.013 7 1/07/02 4:00
0.043 3 3/06/03 22:00
0.011 8 8/26/04 8:00
0.016 6 1/08/05 3:00
0.030 5 1/19/06 0:00
0.043 4 11/24/06 8:00
0.245 1 1/09/08 10:00
Computed Peaks
-----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
--Peaks - -Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (ft) Period
0.245 6.51 1 100.00 0.990
0.051 6.43 2 25.00 0.960
0.043 5.51 3 10.00 0.900
0.043 5.51 4 5.00 0.800
0.030 4.47 5 3.00 0.667
0.016 3.94 6 2.00 0.500
0.013 3.81 7 1. 30 0.231
0.011 2.60 8 1.10 0.091
0.180 6.49 50.00 0.980
Flow Duration from Time Series File: rdoupper. tsf
Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability
CFS % % %
0.001 26253 42.813 42.813 57.187 0.572E+00
0.002 8112 13.229 56.042 43.958 0.440E+00
0.004 6663 10.866 66.908 33.092 0.331E+00
0.005 4894 7.981 74.889 25.111 0.251E+00
0.006 3655 5.961 80.850 19.150 0.192E+00
0.008 3459 5.641 86.491 13.509 o .135E+00
0.009 3792 6.184 92.674 7.326 0.733E-01
0.011 1196 1. 950 94.625 5.375 0.538E-01
0.012 2008 3.275 97.900 2.100 0.210E-01
0.013 870 1.419 99.318 0.682 0.682E-02
0.015 22 0.036 99.354 0.646 0.646E-02
0.016
0.018
0.019
0.020
0.022
0.023
0.025
0.026
0.027
0.029
0.030
0.032
0.033
0.034
0.036
0.037
0.039
0.040
0.041
0.043
0.044
0.046
0.047
0.048
0.050
14
10
10
24
18
28
37
31
32
17
26
13
13
13
12
9
13
15
10
10
7
9
9
7
4
0.023
0.016
0.016
0.039
0.029
0.046
0.060
0.051
0.052
0.028
0.042
0.021
0.021
0.021
0.020
0.015
0.021
0.024
0.016
0.016
0.011
0.015
0.015
0.011
0.007
Duration Comparison Anaylsis
Base File: preupper.tsf
99.377
99.393
99.410
99.449
99.478
99.524
99.584
99.635
99.687
99.715
99.757
99.778
99.799
99.821
99.840
99.855
99.876
99.901
99.917
99.933
99.945
99.959
99.974
99.985
99.992
New File: rdoupper.tsf
Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS
0.623
0.607
0.590
0.551
0.522
0.476
0.416
0.365
0.313
0.285
0.243
0.222
0.201
0.179
0.160
0.145
0.124
0.099
0.083
0.067
0.055
0.041
0.026
0.015
0.008
0.623E-02
0.607E-02
0.590E-02
0.551E-02
0.522E-02
0.476E-02
0.416E-02
0.365E-02
0.313E-02
0.285E-02
0.243E-02
0.222E-02
0.201E-02
0.179E-02
0.160E-02
0.145E-02
0.124E-02
0.995E-03
0.832E-03
0.669E-03
0.554E-03
0.408E-03
0.261E-03
0.147E-03
0.815E-04
-----Fraction of Time--------------Check of Tolerance-------
Cutoff
0.014
0.018
0.021
0.025
0.029
0.033
0.037
0.040
0.044
0.048
0.052
0.055
0.059
0.063
Base New % Change
0.94E-02 0.68E-02 -28.1
0.62E-02 0.61E-02 -2.9
0.48E-02
0.38E-02
0.28E-02
0.22E-02
0.15E-02
0.10E-02
0.64E-03
0.34E-03
0.21E-03
0.16E-03
0.llE-03
0.16E-04
0.53E-02 9.4
0.39E-02 3.9
0.28E-02 -0.6
0.20E-02 -7.4
0.15E-02 5.6
0.96E-03 -6.3
0.55E-03 -12.8
0.18E-03 -47.6
O.OOE+OO -100.0
O.OOE+OO -100.0
O.OOE+OO -100.0
O.OOE+OO -100.0
Probability
0.94E-02
0.62E-02
0.48E-02
0.38E-02
0.28E-02
0.22E-02
0.15E-02
0.10E-02
0.64E-03
0.34E-03
0.21E-03
0.16E-03
o .llE-03
0.16E-04
Maximum positive excursion = 0.002 cfs 7.9%)
occurring at 0.021 cfs on the Base Data=preupper.tsf
and at 0.023 cfs on the New Data:rdoupper.tsf
Maximum negative excursion = 0.004 cfs (-21.3%)
occurring at 0.017 cfs on the Base Data:preupper.tsf
and at 0.013 efs on the New Data:rdoupper.tsf
Base
0.014
0.018
0.021
0.025
0.029
0.033
0.037
0.040
0.044
0.048
0.052
0.055
0.059
0.063
New %Change
0.013 -6.1
0.016 -8.0
0.023
0.026
0.029
0.032
0.037
0.040
0.043
0.046
0.047
0.048
0.049
0.051
7.6
2.0
-0.2
-3.1
1.8
-1.1
-2.4
-3.7
-8.2
-12.8
-16.9
-19.4
Upper vault:
He iJ.6' IJ Hili ·14
~ t"r.'PP""'dt,·
rdouPWdu" .
,
0
· 0 ~
• '''',
0 ~ &
I 0 ." " • " " • '\< " -• ~ ~ ., ~ , , , ,
Flow duration curves developed vault release VS pre-developed condition
5hfi tiEi. ' 51
>0
~
I
"
·
, pr"'4'por ~,,~ in 8.3-T3C
• ra",-"p.r~'"
Cumu"' ...... Probabdity
Flow peak curves developed vault release VS pre-developed condition
-.@
'00
Instructions:
Pond calc Worksheet
Enter site information in the yellow highlighted cells
2 Verify no error message is displayed
3 Results are displayed in Green Box
"Note: pondcalc will not work for negative landcover conversions.
pondcalc does not handle existing EI or TG very well.
Disclaimer: This spreadsheet Is provided without warranty of any kind. Use this spreadsheet
at your own risk. All facility sizes should be verified using KCRTS software.
Rainfall Region ST {either ST or LA see rainfall regions map}
Scale Factor: 1.00 { 0.8 -1.2 see rainfall regions map}
FC Level: 2 { 1, 2, or 3 see flow control app map}
Predeveloped Landcover Postdeveloped Adjusted Acres Error Messages
acres type acres converted cover
0.3 TF . 0.3
0 TP 0
. -
TG 0.04 0.04
. EI 0.26 0.26
TF-till forest, TP = till pasture, TG -till grass, EI = effective impervious
Acreage Check:
gross
adjusted
post
0.3
0.3
LOWER VAULT
pre
0.3
0.3
prelower.pks
pre-developed condition lower portion of the site
Total drainage area = 0.3 acres
Total impervlous area = 0.0 acres
Total pervious area = 0.3 acres (till forest)
Rainfall reagion: seattle
scale factor = 1.0
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:prelower.tsf
project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Flow Rate Rank Time of peak - -peaks Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (CFS) Period
0.019 2 2/09/01 18:00 0.024 1 100.00 0.990
0.005 7 1/05/02 16:00 0.019 2 25.00 0.960
0.014 4 2/28/03 3:00 0.015 3 10.00 0.900
0.001 8 3/24/04 22: 00 0.014 4 5.00 0.800
0.009 6 1/05/05 8:00 0.012 5 3.00 0.667
0.015 3 1/18/06 21: 00 0.009 6 2.00 0.500
0.012 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.005 7 1. 30 0.231
0.024 1 1/09/08 9:00 0.001 8 1.10 0.091
computed peaks 0.022 50.00 0.980
page 1
devl ower1. pks
developed condition lower portion of the site
Total draina~e area = 0.30 acres
Total impervlous area = 0.26 acres
Total pervious area = 0.04 acres (till grass)
Rainfall reagion: Seattle
scale factor = 1.0
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:devlower.tsf
project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak --peaks Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (CFS) Period
0.067 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.131 1 100.00 0.990
0.057 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.096 2 25.00 0.960
0.080 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.080 3 10.00 0.900
0.066 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.078 4 5.00 0.800
0.078 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.071 5 3.00 0.667
0.071 5 1/18/06 16: 00 0.067 6 2.00 0.500
0.096 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.066 7 1. 30 0.231
0.131 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.057 8 1.10 0.091
computed peaks 0.119 50.00 0.980
page 1
Retention/Detention Facility (LOVI/EK VA,.lALT)
Type of Facility,
Facility Length,
Facility Width,
Facility Area:
Effective Storage Depth:
Stage 0 Elevation:
Storage Volume:
Riser Head,
Riser Diameter:
Number of orifices:
Detention Vault
60. 00 ft
20.00 ft
1200. sq.
4.00 ft
0.00 ft
4800. cu.
4.00 ft
ft
ft
12.00 inches
3
Full Head Pipe
Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter
(ft)
1 0.00
2 2.38
3 3.38
Top Notch Weir,
Outflow Rating Curve,
Stage Elevation
(in) (CFS) (in)
0.32 0.006
0.50 0.009 4.0
0.50 0.005 4.0
None
None
Storage Discharge
(ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs)
0.00 0.00 o. 0.000 0.000
0.01 0.01 12. 0.000 0.000
0.02 0.02 24. 0.001 0.000
0.03 0.03 36. 0.001 0.000
0.13 0.13 156. 0.004 0.001
0.23 0.23 276. 0.006 0.001
0.33 0.33 396. 0.009 0.002
0.43 0.43 516. 0.012 0.002
0.53 0.53 636. 0.015 0.002
0.63 0.63 756. 0.017 0.002
0.73 0.73 876. 0.020 0.002
0.83 0.83 996. 0.023 0.003
0.93 0.93 1116. 0.026 0.003
1. 03 1. 03 1236. 0.028 0.003
1.13 1.13 1356. 0.031 0.003
1.23 1. 23 1476. 0.034 0.003
1. 33 1. 33 1596 . 0.037 0.003
1. 43 1. 43 1716. 0.039 0.003
1. 53 1. 53 1836. 0.042 0.003
1. 63 1. 63 1956. 0.045 0.004
1. 73 1. 73 2076. 0.048 0.004
1. 83 1. 83 2196 . 0.050 0.004
1. 93 1. 93 2316. 0.053 0.004
2.03 2.03 2436. 0.056 0.004
2.13 2.13 2556. 0.059 0.004
2.23 2.23 2676. 0.061 0.004
2.33 2.33 2796. 0.064 0.004
2.38 2.38 2856. 0.066 0.004
2.39 2.39 2868. 0.066 0.004
2.40 2.40 2880. 0.066 0.005
2.41 2.41 2892. 0.066 0.006
Percolation
(cfs)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hyd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2.42
2.43
2.53
2.63
2.73
2.83
2.93
3.03
3.13
3.23
3.33
3.38
3.39
3.40
3.41
3.42
3.43
3.53
3.63
3.73
3.83
3.93
4.00
4.10
4.20
4.30
4.40
4.50
4.60
4.70
4.80
4.90
5.00
5.10
5.20
5.30
5.40
5.50
5.60
5.70
5.80
5.90
6.00
2.42
2.43
2.53
2.63
2.73
2.83
2.93
3.03
3.13
3.23
3.33
3.38
3.39
3.40
3.41
3.42
3.43
3.53
3.63
3.73
3.83
3.93
4.00
4.10
4.20
4.30
4.40
4.50
4.60
4.70
4.80
4.90
5.00
5.10
5.20
5.30
5.40
5.50
5.60
5.70
5.80
5.90
6.00
Inflow Outflow
2904.
2916.
3036.
3156.
3276.
3396.
3516.
3636.
3756.
3876.
3996 .
4056.
4068.
4080.
4092.
4104.
4116.
4236.
4356.
4476.
4596 .
4716.
4800.
4920.
5040.
5160.
5280.
5400.
5520.
5640.
5760.
5880.
6000.
6120.
6240.
6360.
6480.
6600.
6720.
6840.
6960.
7080.
7200.
Peak
0.067
0.067
0.070
0.072
0.075
0.078
0.081
0.083
0.086
0.089
0.092
0.093
0.093
0.094
0.094
0.094
0.094
0.097
0.100
0.103
0.106
0.108
0.110
0.113
0.116
0.118
0.121
0.124
0.127
0.129
0.132
0.135
0.138
0.140
0.143
0.146
0.149
0.152
0.154
0.157
0.160
0.163
0.165
Target Calc Stage Elev
0.13 0.02 0.04 4.01 4.01
0.07 *******
0.07 0.01
0.08 *******
0.07 *******
0.06 0.01
0.04 *******
0.07 *******
0.02 3.79
0.01 3.36
0.01 3.37
0.01 2.73
0.00 2.29
0.00 2.34
0.00 1.71
3.79
3.36
3.37
2.73
2.29
2.34
1. 71
Route Time Series through Facility
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.009
0.010
0.010
0.011
0.011
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.014
0.015
0.016
0.017
0.018
0.019
0.020
0.328
0.892
1. 620
2.410
2.700
2.950
3.190
3.410
3.610
3.810
3.990
4.170
4.340
4.500
4.660
4.810
4.960
5.100
5.240
5.380
Storage
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft)
4807.
4543.
4030.
4041.
3276.
2752.
2808.
2054.
0.110
0.104
0.093
0.093
0.075
0.063
0.064
0.047
Inflow Time Series File:devlower.tsf
Outflow Time Series File:rdolower
Inflow/Outflow Analysis
Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.131
Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.037
Peak Reservoir Stage: 4.01
Peak Reservoir Elev: 4.01
Peak Reservoir Storage: 4807.
0.110
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:rdolower.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
CFS at
CFS at
Ft
Ft
Cu-Ft
Ac-Ft
6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
11:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
---Annual Peak Flow Rates--------Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - -
Peaks --Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (CFS) (ft) Period
0.019 2 2/09/01 20:00 0.037 4.01 1 100.00 0.990
0.004 6 1/07/02 4:00 0.019 3.88 2 25.00 0.960
0.012 3 3/06/03 22:00 0.012 3.38 3 10.00 0.900
0.004 8 8/26/04 7:00 0.012 3.36 4 5.00 0.800
0.004 7 1/08/05 5:00 0.009 2.74 5 3.00 0.667
0.009 5 1/18/06 23:00 0.004 2.37 6 2.00 0.500
0.012 4 11/24/06 8:00 0.004 2.34 7 1. 30 0.231
0.037 1 1/09/08 11: 00 0.004 1. 76 8 1.10 0.091
Computed Peaks 0.031 4.00 50.00 0.980
Flow Duration from Time Series File:rdolower.tsf
Cutoff count Frequency CDF Exceedence Probability
CFS % % %
0.000 257 0.419 0.419 99.581 0.996E+00
0.001 32462 52.939 53.358 46.642 0.466E+00
0.001 8214 13.395 66.753 33.247 0.332E+00
0.002 1958 3.193 69.946 30.054 0.301E+00
0.002 9707 15.830 85.776 14.224 o .142E+00
0.003 847 1.381 87.158 12.842 0.128E+00
0.003 4991 8.139 95.297 4.703 0.470E-01
0.004 218 0.356 95.652 4.348 0.435E-01
0.004 2282 3.721 99.374 0.626 0.626E-02
0.005 6 0.010 99.384 0.616 0.616E-02
0.005 6 0.010 99.393 0.607 0.607E-02
0.006 3 0.005 99.398 0.602 0.602E-02
0.006 34 0.055 99.454 0.546 0.546E-02
0.007 41 0.067 99.521 0.479 0.479E-02
0.007 51 0.083 99.604 0.396 a.396E-02
0.008 27 0.044 99.648 0.352 O. 352E-02
0.008 33 0.054 99.702 0.298 0.298E-02
0.009 26 0.042 99.744 0.256 0.256E-02
0.009 37 0.060 99.804 0.196 o .196E-02
0.010 7 0.011 99.816 0.184 0.184E-02
0.010 26 0.042 99.858 0.142 0.142E-02
0.011 9 0.015 99.873 0.127 o .127E-02
0.011 22 0.036 99.909 0.091 0.913E-03
0.012 8 0.013 99.922 0.078 0.783E-03
0.012 21 0.034 99.956 0.044 0.440E-03
0.013 1 0.002 99.958 0.042 0.424E-03
0.013 4 0.007 99.964 0.036 0.3S9E-03
0.014 1 0.002 99.966 0.034 0.342E-03
0.014 0 0.000 99.966 0.034 0.342E-03
0.015 4 0.007 99.972 0.02B 0.277E-03
0.015 1 0.002 99.974 0.026 0.261E-03
0.016 3 0.005 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03
0.016 1 0.002 99.980 0.020 0.196E-03
0.017 2 0.003 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03
0.017 2 0.003 99.987 0.013 0.130E-03
O.OlB 2 0.003 99.990 0.010 0.978E-04
Duration Comparison Anaylsis
Base File: prelower.tsf
New File: rdolower.tsf
Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS
-----Fraction of Time--------------Check of
Cutoff Base New %Change Probability Base
0.004 0.10E-01 0.42E-01 30B.5 I 0.10E-01 0.004
0.005 0.70E-02 0.61E-02 -12.4 I 0.70E-02 0.005
0.006 0.SlE-02 0.S3E-02 5.8 I 0.SlE-02 0.006
0.007 0.38E-02 0.38E-02 -0.4 I 0.38E-02 0.007
0.009 0.30E-02 0.26E-02 -13.0 I 0.30E-02 0.009
0.010 0.23E-02 0.lBE-02 -lB.7 I 0.23E-02 0.010
0.011 0.16E-02 0.12E-02 -26.0 I 0.16E-02 0.011
0.012 o .l1E-02 0.67E-03 -36.9 I 0.llE-02 0.012
0.013 0.S9E-03 0.36E-03 -38.9 I 0.S9E-03 0.013
0.014 0.3BE-03 0.31E-03 -17.4 I 0.38E-03 0.014
0.015 0.23E-03 0.24E-03 7.1 I 0.23E-03 0.015
0.017 0.16E-03 0.16E-03 0.0 I 0.16E-03 0.017
0.018 0.82E-04 0.82E-04 0.0 I 0.B2E-04 O.OlB
0.019 0.33E-04 O.OOE+OO -100.0 I 0.33E-04 0.019
Maximum positive excursion = 0.001 cfs ( 9.5%)
occurring at 0.005 cfs on the Base Data:prelower.tsf
and at 0.006 cfs on the New Data:rdolower.tsf
Maximum negative excursion = 0.001 cfs (-26.3%)
occurring at 0.005 cfs on the Base Data:prelower.tsf
and at 0.004 cfs on the New Data:rdolower.tsf
Tolerance-------
New %Change
0.004 0.8
0.004 -21.7
0.006 3.3
0.007 -0.2
O.OOB -5.0
0.009 -7.3
0.010 -7.8
0.011 -8.2
0.012 -B.6
0.013 -9.0
0.015 0.1
0.017 0.4
0.018 0.6
O.OlB -2.5
Lower vault:
bE Il4..-i1
tilllo~·_r -lUI ,
rdob",.r dur •
\::,
~, ~ Ho---------------J--~~~'~~--,-------------------------
I ~\
\~
~,r_--------------------------------~\~--~------~b_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'~~~~~~
10·' 10' 10' 10 1 10' 1O~
Flow duration curves developed vault release VS pre-developed condition
;0", ,_,,'" m" ~~t'X
@
~
" pr_pes,nSaa-Tao
• rclOlOl_P'«
RetumPenod ,
~!o··~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i
'" u, '------:~----~-----.~'"--------:,TO ----~,,----.ro ---,',----"r' ---,'~-----'"~-----,,~-----,,~---;;_"-~
Flow peak curves developed vault release VS pre-developed condition
SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS
FIGURE 3.2.2.A RAINFALL REGIONS AND REGIONAL SCALE FACTORS
ST 1.1
ST 1.1
v ..... ,."."
ST 1.0
ST 1.0
Rainfall Regions and
Regional Scale Factors
i::~~::-~:] Incorporated Area
......c::J River/Lake
Major Road
11912009
LA 1.0 LA1.2
SNOHO"'sH CoUNTy
KINo COUNTY
LANDSBURG
LA 0.9 LA 1.2 LA 1.0
2009 Surface Water Design Manual
3-22
City of Renton
Zoning
1 SOO 3 000 '
" ,', ,!
IJPQott4 tnroulifl Or..,,,,,. 5000
E'!ectivl on ~f 30, 200i --_ .. __ .... _-
=::::::.:::;:::::."':'= ""--... -.-...... _-.. 1.0_-._. __
INFORM ATION T EC HNO L OGY-G IS
P rinted ~n l'"ebl1;a ry 3, 2010
......... _fllC I R .... nCoM .... _
1",·,)11. __ ,_
1"'''1 11._ ..... '_ 111 4 1110 __
~""_101_~_ 111·''1 __ _
_111-101_'_
_(IIIU}IIo_IoI.....",....,
.1I':I'.T)lIooi.-...."'I'_
(IUO-UI_ ..... I-f -,.-...c:_
•• "'UK Cf!!TJfl' IIWlII!l!.I. _(CVIe........... D r-.J_'~"UgN
_jUC -H .)I.Irb«Ic.n. .. ....,h ' .. 1-. ..... _
!UC.fQ)_C'O' ....... h Z _ .... 1-... .... -,.,. _"'1)1__ c:!-.,.,,,-
_jCOfQc. c "".
D p l "--'"'-
_(COI C_O_
_ .... IC--..... _..___
iMAP
Ok) ':CQ,r.cy~· COOiPiet;~~,-ti·~i~·~~. ;';-Mg'htS't; the'~se of -..~Ch-information . this document Is not intended for -use as a survey product King County I til
' special, indirect. incidenta, or consequential damage. including, but not limited to , lost revenues Of lost profits resulting from the un or misuse of the • KO.ng County
Any ..... of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County. .
Date: 919/2013 Source: King County iMAP • Property Information
Reference 11-C
City of Renton Soil Survey Map
Public INorks
Surface Water Utility
G. De! Rosario
1212212009
o 0.5
Miles
o Grc Lmdwat", Protecl;onAru Boundary
Aq.J ,ter ProledionAr~8Zone I
\
o AQ,I jfef Prot ec'ion/llea Zont 1 Mo<i~e d o Renlon City Limrs
~
N
3.2.2 KCRTSIRUNOFF FILES METHOD -GENERATING TIME SERIES
TABLE 3.2.2.B EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN SCS SOIL TYPES AND KCRTS SOIL TYPES
SCS Soil Type SCS KCRTSSoil Notes
Hydrologic Group
Soil Group
Alderwood (AgB(AgC, AgO)} \. C) \. Till}
Arenls, Alderwood Material (AmB, AmC) C Till
Arenls, Everelt Material (An) B Outwash 1
Beausite (BeC, BeD, Be F) C Till 2
Bellingham (Bh) 0 Till 3
Briscot (Br) 0 Till 3
Buckley (Bu) 0 Till 4
Earlmont (Ea) 0 Till 3
Edgewick (Ed) C Till 3
Everelt (EvB, EvC, EvO, EwC) AlB Outwash 1
Indianola (InC, InA, InO) A Outwash 1
Kitsap (KpB, KpC, KpO) C Till
Klaus (KsC) C Outwash 1
Neilton (NeC) A Outwash 1
Newberg (Ng) B Till 3
Nooksack (Nk) C Till 3
Norma (No) 0 Till 3
Orcas (Or) 0 Wetland
Oridia (Os) 0 Till 3
Ovall (OvC, OvO, OvF) C Till 2
Pilchuck (Pc) C Till 3
Puget (Pu) 0 Till 3
Puyallup (Py) B Till 3
Ragnar (RaC, RaO, RaC, RaE) B Outwash 1
Renlon (Re) 0 Till 3
Salal (Sa) C Till 3
Sammamish (Sh) 0 Till 3
Sealtle (Sk) 0 Weiland
Shalcar (Sm) 0 Till 3
Si (Sn) C Till 3
Snohomish (So, Sr) 0 Till 3
Sultan (Su) C Till 3
Tukwila (Tu) 0 Till 3
Woodinville (Wo) 0 Till 3
Notes:
1. Where outwash soils are saturated or underlain at shallow depth «5 feet) by glacial till, they should
be treated as till soils.
2. These are bedrock soils, but calibration of HSPF by King County DNRP shows bedrock soils to
have similar hydrologic response to till soils.
3. These are alluvial soils, some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water
table. In the absence of detailed study, these soils should be treated as till soils.
4. Buckley soils are formed on the low-permeability Osceola mudfiow. Hydrologic response is
assumed to be similar to that of till soils.
2009 Surface Water Design Manual 119/2009
3-25
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND
PROJECT ENGINEER
Project Owner eM bet Reo.{ £t.-bo.,D,
Phone (2.06) 6tH -882.1
Address , 112,1; wtrdlh. C-r-eeR I'I2!Ifk.Wfll(}<Ai~
BothfA{ I wA 2601 I
Project Engineer ,1T''''~ F~
Company y",dtc:. ~lMHil'l~ Des;~ 1/...1...6.
Phone {z.nh)h~~-S 2/
Par13 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION
~ Landuse Services
Subdivison (Short SubS) I UPD
~ Building Servi~
M/F I Commerical~
ijg Clearing and Grading
'tiS! Right-of-Way Use
o Other
Part 5 PLAN AND REPORT INFORMATION
Technical Information Report
Type of Drainage Review @/ Targeted I
(circle): Large Site
Date (include revision
dates):
Date of Final:
Part 6 ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS
Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND
DESCRIPTION
Project Name
DDES Permit # ________ _
Location Township
Range
Section _____ _
Site Address _________ _
Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS
o DFWHPA o Shoreline o COE404 o DOE Dam Safety o FEMA Floodplain o COE Wetlands
Management
~S~ Rocke ~ o ESA Section 7
o Other
Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans)
Type (circle one): <.Eiiil> I Modified I
Small Site
Date (include revision
dates):
Date of Final:
Type (circle one): Standard I Complex I Preapplication I Experimental I Blanket
Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2)
Date of Approval:
2005 Surface Water Design Manual
1
1/1/05
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monitoring Required: Yes /@ Describe:
Start Date:
Completion Date:
Part 8 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN
Community Plan: $OQS C,ru.t
Special District Overlays: ~C2Q S c.):::....e/i w,,;;f~~ /3",,"/ ,~e~~ 12; rl;:r::c:l!;
Drainage Basin: ~tM1thw Crof£R
Stormwater Requirem -nts: I '-upJ 2. ( pxl'or; ... ", J, ""C ft11.) FLow c.m-troL
,
,. ~\" VV~..-, v rr v,_ 'v -v'
Part 9 ON SITE AND ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS
I:l River/Stream I:l Steep Slope
I:l Lake I:l Erosion Hazard
I:l Wetlands I:l Landslide Hazard
[J Closed Depression 1:81 Coal Mine Hazard
I:l Floodplain I:l Seismic Hazard
I:l Other I:l Habitat Protection
I:l
Part 10 SOILS
Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential
A~c.. 6 ''-is'£:. f'II.Qrli.r.lA:te,
A~D I~,..... 30',:::'. .sevet"-e.
D High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) D Sole Source Aquifer
D Other D Seeps/Springs
I:l Additional Sheets Attached
2005 Surface Water Design Manual 111/05
2
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 11 DRAINAGE DESIGN LIMITATIONS
REFERENCE LIMITATION / SITE CONSTRAINT
III Core 2 -Offsite Analysis
~ Sensitive/Critical Areas
~ SEPA
o Other
0
o Additional Sheets Attached
Part 12 TIR SUMMARY SHEET (provide one TIR Summary Sheet per Threshold DischarQe Area)
Threshold Discharge Area: I'l-l> CM-t..V~t c.;y,,~\~ -roJ,bof; l'V~ S~ (name or description)
Core Requirements (all 8 apply)
Discharge at Natural Location Number of Natural Discharge Locations: J
Offsite Analysis Level: (J,J/2/3 dated: '1I"Z-'31 u:> I :!.
Flow Control Level: 1 ~~_ 3 or Exemption Number
(incl. facilitv summary sheet) Small Site BM s
Conveyance System Spill containment located at: ,
IlAlp:l; tI", ut/i
Erosion and Sediment Control ESC Site Supervisor: jq be Pk.-tvt~I~. Contact Phone:
After Hours Phone:
Maintenance and Operation Responsibility: Private l{f'ubliC>
If Private, Maintenance Log Required: Yes / No
Financial Guarantees and Provided: @/No
Liabilitv
Water Quality Type: lBasic) / Sens. Lake / Enhanced Basicm / Bog
(include facility summary sheet) or Exemption No.
Landscape Management Plan: Yes / No
Special Requirements (as applicable)
Area Specific Drainage Type: CDA / SDO / MOP / BP / LMP / Shared Fac. /(I'Jone)
Requirements Name: ---
Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major / Minor / Exemption I(£!onv
1 ~O-year Base Flood Elevation (or range):
Datum:
Flood Protection Facilities Describe:
Source Control Describe landuse:
(comm.lindustriallanduse) Describe any structural controls:
2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/1/05
3
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
-=-Oil Control High-use Site: Yes lev
Treatment BMP:
Maintenance Agreement: Yes I No
with whom?
Other Drainage Structures
Describe: i"Vo olt:twri;;QV\ / Wet> VD'-U{;t,s. OI1.R" il'\ ,:)\. Se-peyc(,;Q"e{ tv0
~ct -t:~ ~Y ovtJ!. ,;.,." bW. e+1t"l'VI.YIlA cst ~ttl. Ot.c..cv..> 5-&-~.
Part 13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION
Il:I Clearing Limits 1iQl Stabilize Exposed Surfaces
~ Cover Measures il Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities
Ii9 Perimeter Protection ~ Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris Ensure
I:i9 Traffic Area Stabilization Operation of Permanent Facilities
~ Sediment Retention ~ Flag Limits of SAO and open space
W Surface Water Control
preservation areas
D Other 6!J Dust Control
CiSI Construction Seauence
Part 14 STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS (Note: Include Facility Summary and Sketch)
Flow Control Type/Description Water Quality Type/Description
W Detention (.OlI\ ... bi~,'ktel'\i;:OVI D Biofiltration I"' ~v
(-"'WI b,~ ki .. ~
D Infiltration liI Wetpool w~ W,.IJ, tm.
D Regional Facility D Media Filtration
D Shared Facility D Oil Control
D Small Site BMPs D Spill Control
D Other D Small Site BMPs
o Other
2005 Surface Water Design Manual 111/05
4
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
Part 15 EASEMENTSffRACTS Part 16 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
jig Drainage Easement ~ Cast in Place Vault
D Access Easement D Retaining Wall
D Native Growth Protection Covenant D Rockery > 4' High
IiliI Tract D Structural on Steep Slope
D Other D Other
Part 17 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
I, or a civil engineer under my supervision, have visited the site, Actual site conditions as observed were
incorporated into this worksheet and the attached Technical Information Report. To the best of my
knowledge the information provided here is accurate,
J~'~ -C .~ lo/f6 1'-013
\.\ '\,,\ \ SignediDate
'-'
2005 Surface Water Design Manual 111105
5
APPENDIX B
LEVEL I OFF-SITE ANALYSIS
FOR
TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SHORT PLAT
September 23,2013
CLIENT:
Caliber Real Estate
19125 North Creek Parkway, Suite 123
Bothell, WA 98011
Phone: (206) 683-8821
PREPARED BY:
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC.
15445 53 rd Avenue South, Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431-7970
Fax: (206) 388-1648
PED Job No. 13053
TASK 1:
TASK 2:
TASK 3:
TASK 4:
TASK 5:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Study Area Definition and Maps
General Information
On-Site Drainage Analysis
Upstream Drainage Analysis
Downstream Drainage System Description
Future Site Conditions
Resource Review
1. Critical Drainage Area Map
2. Flood Plain/Floodway (FEMA) Maps
3. Offsite Analysis Reports
4. Sensitive Areas Information
5. SWM Division Drainage Investigation Information
6. City of Renton Soils Survey Maps
Field Inspection
1. Investigation of Reported or Observed Problems During Resource
Review
2. Location of Existing/Potential Constrictions or Lack of Capacity in the
Existing Drainage System
3. Identify Existing/Potential Flooding Problems
4. Identify Existing/Potential Overtopping, Scouring, Bank Sloughing, or
Sedimentation
5. Identification of Significant Destruction of Aquatic Habitat or Organisms
6. Collect Qualitative Data on Land Use, Impervious Surfaces,
Topography and Soil Types
7. Collect Information on Pipe Sizes, Channel Characteristics and
Drainage Structures
8. Verify Tributary Basins Delineated in Task 1
9. Contact Neighboring Property Owners in the Area
10. Note the Date and Weather Conditions at the Time of the Site Visit
Drainage System Description and Problem Description
1. Drainage System Descriptions
2. Problems
Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Exhibit H
Exhibit I
Exhibit J
APPENDIX
Vicinity Map
Drainage Basin Map
Downstream Drainage System Map
Flood Plain/Floodway (FEMA) Map
Assessors Map
Sensitive Areas Information
SWM Division Drainage Investigation Information
City of Renton Soils Survey Map
Off-Site Analysis Drainage System Table, As-built drawings
and photos
Site Plan of Talbot Road South Short Plat
TASK 1: Study Area Definition and Maps
General Information
The project is proposed to be constructed a 5 single family lots short plat in a 1.34 acres
parcel. The site address is 3340 Talbot Road South. The parcel is located in Section
30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, King County Washington.
The parcel number is 3023059071. The pan handle shape site abuts Talbot Road
South to the west, existing single-family residential housing to the north and
undeveloped parcels to the east and south. The site is currently developed with a
single family residence which will be removed for this development. The development
proposes to construct 5 new single-family lots with a public access street and a
detention/water quality treatment Tract. Current zoning is R-8 (Residential, 8 DU per
acre). All necessary utilities and stormwater facilities will be constructed to serve the
new development.
On-5ite Drainage Analysis
The project site is situated within the Panther Creek Basin. The site is rolling pasture,
covered predominantly by pasture grass. Interspersed are conifer trees, deciduous
trees, landscape shrubbery, and an asphalt driveway. The site is underlain by
Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC) for the majority of the site, and (AgD) in the lower
portion of the access road. The site drains southwesterly, discharging off-site into an
18-inch lined corrugated polyethylene pipe (LCPE) storm system near the southwest
corner of the property. The upper portion of the site (the rectangular shape part) slopes
southwesterly at an average overall slope of approximately 5 percent. The upper 140
feet of the access road slopes southwesterly at an average slope of approximately 8.5
percent and the lower 300 feet of the access road slopes southwesterly at an average
slope of approxirnately 16 to 20 percent.
Upstream Drainage Analysis
The northern adjacent properties in the Winsper division 1 have their own drainage
system that drains to a detention/wet pond for the subdivision. The eastern and
southern adjacent properties are in lower elevations and drains away from the site. The
site receives sheet flow runoff from a 0.58 acres tributary area of approximately half of
the eastern adjacent parcel. The land use within this area is comprised of sloping forest
areas. A bypass tightline system comprising 18-inch LCPE storms bypasses the site
along the southern adjacent property. This drainage system conveys runoffs from
Cherie Lane subdivision (detained and treated) and other upstream areas east of Wells
Avenue South. The Talbot Road South street section along the project frontage is built
out with asphalt shoulders, roadside ditches, culverts, storm pipes and catch basins.
Downstream Drainage System Description
The project is located within the Panther Creek Basin. The total basin to Y. mile
downstream is estimated to be 63.5 acres. Within Y. mile downstream of this project,
the site contributes less than 15% of the total basin drainage area; therefore the
downstream drainage system will be reviewed and described to Y. mile downstream
from the site. As discussed above, the site discharges into an 18-inch LCPE storm
system adjacent to the southwest property comer. This 18 inch storm then drains
southerly along the east side of Talbot Road South to a catch basin and then tums
westerly crossing Talbot Road South and discharges to a drainage swale that drains to
Panther Creek.
The downstream system is well defined. Near the frontage of the site, the drainage
ditch along the east side of Talbot Road South is approximately 2' wide at the bottom, 1
to 2' deep with 2:1 side slopes at both sides. At the south end of the ditch near the
southwest comer of the site, there is an 8 LF 18" LCPE culvert that drains to a type 2
catch basin. This is the start point of the downstream analysis and the collection point
of the onsite runoff, from this type 2 catch basin, another 86 LF 18" LCPE pipe runs
southerly to a type 1 L and drains to a 70LF 12" RCP pipe that tums westerly across
Talbot Road South and discharges swale that drains to Panther Creek. The swale is
approximately 20 to 30' wide, 1 to 3' deep, with less than 3:1 side slopes and covered
with heavy vegetation and drains westerly for the first 400 feet. Then, the swale tums
northwesterly and changes to a valley of more than 10 feet deep for the rest 200 feet
and joints Panther Creek at the bottom of the valley. There is a large wetland area
along Panther Creek between SR-167 and the bottom of slope west of Talbot Road
South. The Y. mile downstream point from the site is located in Panther Creek near the
outfall to the creek from the Winsper Division 1 and its downstream system. This point is
approximately 1380 feet downstream from the project site, which is greater than y. mile
and the analysis is therefore terminated.
See Exhibit B for the Drainage Basin Map, Exhibit C for a visual illustration of the
Downstream Drainage System Map, and Exhibit I for the Off-Site Analysis Drainage
System Table, As-built drawings and photos.
Future Site Conditions
To match the topography of the site, the development is proposing to install a new
combined detention/wet vault will be installed in a separate tract for the upper portion of
the site and discharge into the existing 18 inch storm line in the southem adjacent
property. Another combined detention/wet vault will be installed near the entrance of
the access road to treat runoff from the access road. Basic Water Quality Treatment
and Conservation Flow Control with forest existing condition (Level 2 Flow Control) are
required for these facilities.
TASK 2: Resource Review
The following is a description of each of the resources reviewed in preparation of this
Downstream Analysis:
1. Critical Drainage Area Map
The project is located within the Panther Creek Basin.
2. Flood Plain/Floodway (FEMA) Maps
The site is not within a 1 OO-year floodplain. Refer to Exhibit D.
3. Offsite Analysis Reports
No additional offsite analyses where available for this project site. The
information contained within this report is based upon field reconnaissance and
resource review only.
4. Sensitive Areas Information
Copies of the Sensitive Areas information obtained from the City of Renton
showing the location of the site are included as Exhibit F. According to this
information, the lower portion of the site may contain potential coal mine hazard
area. Also, there are may be a small wetland area near the middle of the east
property line further study is required to identity the wetland boundary and buffer
area.
5. SWM Division Drainage Investigation Infonmation
A review of the King County Water and Land Resources Division -Drainage
Services Section revealed several complaints within the downstream drainage
course approximately 1 mile downstream from the project site. A map of these
complaints and copies of the individual complaints is included as Exhibit G.
These complaints where reviewed, analyzed, and categorized below:
Complaint No. Description of Complaint Tvpe Mitigation
1990-0353 New Plat diverts C
drainaQe/storm.
Conservation Flow Control Area
1991-0929 Flooding caused by plugged NIA
ditch at private driveway. Match historic durations for 50% of
2-year through 50-year peaks AND
matches historic 2-year and 10-
Flooding, new plat road water year peaks
1989-0563 flowing over road. NIA
Complaint #1990-0353: This complaint happened in the project property and
may be related to the development of Winsper subdivision. The problem has
been solved with the finish of the development.
Complaint #1991-0929: This complaint happened in parcel 302305-9041 and
may be related to the development of Wins per subdivision. The problem has
been solved with the finish of the development.
Complaint #1989-0563: This complaint happened in parcel 302305-9019 and
may be related to the development of Winsper subdivision. The problem has
been solved with the finish of the development.
6. City of Renton Soils Survey Maps
According to City of Renton Soils Survey Map ("Exhibit H"), the soil underlying
the site is Alderwood sandy loam (AgC) for the upper portion of the site, the
upper portion of the access road and (AgD) for the lower portion of the access
road.
TASK 3: Field Inspection
The project site is situated within the Panther Creek Basin. The site is rolling pasture,
covered predominantly by pasture grass. Interspersed are conifer trees, deciduous
trees, landscape shrubbery, an asphalt access road leading to the residence and a
gravel driveway leading to an out building. The site is underlain by Alderwood gravelly
sandy loam (AgC) for the upper portion of the site, and (AgO) for the lower portion of the
access road. The site drains southwesterly, discharging off-site into an 18-inch LCPE
storm in the east road side ditch of Talbot Road South adjacent to the southwest
property comer. There was no off-site runoff at the time of site inspections because it
was not raining. The upper rectangular portion of the site slopes to the southwest at an
average overall slope of approximately 5 percent. The upper 140 feet of the access
road slopes southwesterly at an average slope of approximately 8.5%, the lower 300
feet of the access road slopes southwesterly at an average slope of 16 to 20%.
1. Investigation of Reported or Observed Problems During Resource Review
No ongoing drainage problems were identified in the review. There have been
documented complaints which were received during 1989 to 1991. These
complaints may be related to the development of the Wins per subdivision and
the problems have been solved with the finish of the development. No additional
reports have been received at this location.
2. Location of Existing/Potential Constrictions or Lack of Capacity in the Existing
Drainage System
No existing/potential constrictions or lack of capacity in the existing drainage
system were found within 0.25 miles downstream of the site.
3. Identify Existing/Potential Flooding Problems
At the time of the site visit, there did not appear to be any evidence of flooding or
erosion problems within the existing downstream drainage system.
4. Identify Existing/Potential Overtopping, Scouring. Bank Sloughing. or
Sedimentation
There appeared to be no evidence of overtopping, scouring or bank scouring or
sedimentation problems on the site or within 0.25 miles downstream of the site.
5. Identification of Significant Destruction of Aquatic Habitat or Organisms
At the time of the site visit, there where no signs of aquatic habitat or organism
destruction.
6. Collect Qualitative Data on Land Use. Impervious Surfaces. Topography and Soil
Types
Qualitative data has been collected. Land use of the site is single family
residential. The existing residence was built in 1963. Total impervious area
under existing condition is approximately 12,000 sf (0.28 acres) including roof,
deck, porch, asphalt and gravel driveways. The site is underlain by Alderwood
gravelly sandy loam (AgC) for the upper portion of the site, and (AgO) for the
lower portion of the access road. See attached topography map and soil maps
for topography and soil information.
7. Collect Information on Pipe Sizes. Channel Characteristics and Drainage
Structures
See Exhibit C and I for this information.
8. Verify Tributarv Basins Delineated in Task 1
At the time of the site visit, the tributary basins described in Task 1 were verified
as being accurate.
9. Contact Neighboring Property Owners in the Area
No homeowners where contacted during the field reconnaissance for this
analysis.
10. Note the Date and Weather Conditions at the Time of the Site Visit
The site and downstream system was visited on September 24,2013. At this
time it was cloudy.
TASK 4: Drainage System Description and Problem Description
1. Drainage System Descriptions:
See task 1 Upstream Drainage System Analysis and Downstream Drainage
System Description.
See Exhibit C for a visual illustration of this drainage course, and Exhibit I for the
Off-Site Analysis Drainage System Table, As-built drawings and photos.
2. Problems:
As discussed in this report, during the site visit, no recent or ongoing problems
where observed within the downstream drainage course. With the installation of
Basic Water Quality Treatment and Conservation Flow Control forest existing
condition (Level 2 Flow Control), the project should not pose significant negative
impacts to the downstream drainage.
TASK 5: Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems
To match the topography of the site, the development is proposing to install a new
combined detention/wet vault will be installed in a separate tract for the upper portion of
the site and discharge into the existing 18 inch storm line in the southern adjacent
property. Another combined detention/wet vault will be installed near the entrance of
the access road to treat runoff from the access road. Basic Water Quality Treatment
and Conservation Flow Control forest existing condition (Level 2 Flow Control) is
required for the facility. It is anticipated that this level of flow control will mitigate for the
historic nuisance flooding experienced in the area.
This level 1 analysis has provided a complete review of the downstream conditions.
With implementation of the previously mentioned recommendations, the project should
not pose significant negative impacts to the downstream drainage course.
Appendix
Exhibit A
Vicinity Map
:'12/
t"SIIf~II~~ ll'l
&-BO~~t $(1Jrag~
1 •
r
II
V"II,y Medica' CeJ1r~r
4J[t/ ;~;t
c,
"-t,:: 1,-·n::l:"~
t~)~
inarna? I:;
TEJ3f:d4Je Park
:',\,
,;.~,!n ~.,
0,
S ;, .. £i Cl
,
~i
b"; :;-:1,"', ;.:,'
8
,:~ ?
,~:~
':.= ,
"
VICINITY MAP :",
If
," lZ' -,.
:r.
I~'
{i:,'
.%~.,':,~ ,1"0(<1; E:
~'?
':"'"
," '.:.;\
7
::,.
.~:
f)
f
~
~
" ~
? ,;;
Cross & Crown
Chti$lhm uI,
"r.schOoI
-
_::r L, ~ ., , ~ :.~ ~,~ ",i ~
~
~:c ; ~( :_, ~I ",C 1,\1:1'1 1 "'I
Exhibit B
Drainage Basin Map
OJ
~ iIIp.sTRsAM DAAJNA~E e.A6/N 17H'EBT F/..OW T/7 THE SITE-
@ L.ucATloN of DAA/JJN;,,.E $TR/.IC.Tt.A~ ~ !.\r9T~ tlIWAJAG,E iM6IN TO IS· /"'C.PE S
L cG,ENV , C'/N~/re vAAINA6rE BA~IIJ
City of Renton Print map Template I
\_~_~-~::<,\\7 \ ::::J.\F~~.~\ ]3003 111 \ \ /1tt15\:;:::::'" \'\
-I '-,~ \ ". '''I l n
I 3<121 \ -\ ) \' .. ~ U A~ _
I I~' I '. "'I . ../ '927 ' I' \ >1" C ;i~'/ ~rT R
' -'\-" I ". ,,,. '" / I A['--I ___ ' I_ I, -\ ", ~\3Q" 'I" 3100 '" 02' 642
1
_ 7 J-.J ___
j
J
-\, ~ ( "'I'''t--J-
e--\" \ -.' Dj;" ..J_~, _ ...... _ __ ___ " "'! I ~ I---! I ", "" , '''' '''' " ,,/ , .. , (" 1 ' "" '" \ _
I \\ >1,: 9'\-, .lJl."o-i ;1' "'Jf''''! !."/Jh i'\/ __ u;'I-T-, ,I
" 1
I
,I
,
I
I
I ~ ~ >11T ~'''''' -1
601
(/ '(,"'/kl ! ~_:"_~ U'"' I "", I") . \'. '--' "'\;", ""'i ~\ \ J---.J I_L
I
"" -"" -" \\ \ -(, '% I "\/' '-:-,,-,;, ---.:/\"6 \ _ _ '-~~---~\--·----~r-':~~:-::;-L'_:~~fl/'-·~--~;~I Dl:,J H: '.-,\03211 -~ -r----------J.,rl",I" '> (fl'" ! 1 .... I~,_
I PANTHER CREEK
\\:~%~~ , ~'\~r llL a~~~fD~--L-~@1. '-1~~
'-"--, ~ r.,., ., ,'. '" ~ ... /l. rl;"" _
1
'i'-!i'! I :I I "" . 1 _____ ~~. (,,. I II~ , -I!!) " = _"'" , __
-Ib -/--t ~~
t \ 304'19/ " 1---::~~>/,~2: I'
-' -i--~ I-)-~
I , ,
I 350J. " .I J.500
17025 1 I
--=\ ~,:==:;===;-
\ 1'1 3500 3o~01
~-
'1-_
loTAL ARB'\
1/4 MILl: PRAINAGlrc
,.SAbIN 63.S:Av.
ir -I" I,
I· 305Q2
'"
r 1-1--1 ~11003 1021;
L'''' LJ.J L:11O _I
~I
13_1~,
I~
.131~, I~ I 32(1(1
L
401 o 200 401 Fee1
Information Technology -GIS
RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.gov
This map is a user generated staUc output from an Internet mapping site and
is for reference only_ Data layers thaI appear on this map mayor may not be
accurate, current, or otherwise reliable.
WGS_19B4 _Web _ Merca\of_ Auxiliary_Sphere 0912412013 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION
E)<.\1\IblT 12 DRAINAgE 5A?IN Mt\P \ of 2.
ITiI T 17 11I C> l')l1:R
vAA/NN::r~ eA6IN5
VII I Ttl 1,11 1/4 MILE
DIlWN-:'TRS,
city and County Boundary ."' Ci C'y".Ii_"
Addresses
n Paroo[s
El Wetlands
100' P~mary
100'Intermediate
20'Prim~ry
20' Intermediate
5'Pnmary
5' Intermediate
2' Pnmary
2' Intermediate
structure
Cllehb .. ",·Typo'
CII"hb .. .,·Typoll
Co"",,"IolCu"Injo,·T\<P'I<
"' •• 'nlo'
""""""""'_T .... 2MH _.R_
""",,,V,u'
'" u,_St..""., ..
•
"
"""'h,,""",·Typo ,
""""'''"''''' ·Typo'L
Co""",....:."1.10,· Typo.
DI •• I.Io,
CI""'bo"'-T~ ... ~MH
UloIiIyVoul
un_St' .........
eo"""'"",-T,.,.-'
"""'h"""",_Ty ... 2MH
Control structure
00 II."""'M ...... ""'.
® Ptl""'.'y .... ,,, ......
II Pump Station
OUtfall
'" II.""", M ...... , .. d Ck,O,.,
Notes
None
o
1:2.403
City of R:et1ton!i}
Finance & IT Division
City of Renton Print map Template
1::::\\:/'("612\.\\ / I ',---I ,lIT' '. 4 i i~1 \""/\\ \0 V'\V<J )lJf=--!---!r==1
401
3300
"" (§ I m ,=-=-:J t~mJ
111
"00 "<l2
o 200
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
401 Feet
In[ormatlon Technology· GIS
RentonMapSupport@Rentonwa.Qov
09/24/2013
1040~
This map is a user generated staUc output from an Internet mapping site and
is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map mayor may not be
accurate, current, or otherwise feliable.
THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIG,.O.TION
EXI'\IBI} \3 Di3AINAG-E i¥6JH MAP ;Z of z
Legend
C~y and County Boundary
Ci C<yolAo,,,n
AddressBS
Par~el5
EJ wetlands
100' Primary
100' Intermediate
20' Primary
20' Intermediate
5' Primary
5' Intermediate
2' Primary
2' Intermediate
Structure
CaI<ll""'·Typol
Cueh ..... • Typo' L
COII<I'II,oIC.rb Inh,· Typ* ~
Oto~ Inlot
c.I<II"IO'n·T,oo.MH
-. .. R ... ,
Uliolyv.u •
.'! Un""""","""""'"
COIch ...... ·T,.... \
eolrn ..... ·r .... n
OO..,.. .. IC"'.,~.t-T/i"'.
o..,..'n'"
CO""''' .... ·T ....... H
U'""YVa""
<;:10.0"0"'
., ou,.,
U"'""",Sl,"""'"
C._...,·Typ*'
c...., .. ..,,·Tyi>O:lMH
Control Structure
+) Ron!onlolalrUlMd
® Pr~ ... ~M.In"lnod
II Pump Station
Outfall
" JI.o ............... 'o.Mal
Notes
None
o
1:2.403
Exhibit C
Downstream Drainage System Map
,
" ,
I, ,
i---
Ii
City of Renton Print map Template
\ ) '" r<\ \ "" f--'''' ,-'--il I'~OI' \.. \ \~~,~:<~=;._v A<:O~ ""J l "'41~ '-::J '20 j~\ 30:) l:J 'm"I~ '02' \'
",,', I v-/' '~-~ I r .~ ~ \ \
1
'--"I" 'I, '\ '''/r~-'" 701 []--::J '" 1-i-f-\---I/~I~--'TJ'--R''''\\
_ -+-, _,_"31 ---\.~:I_, _ _"_ ,~-= _L'" I :J~ 721 I '" I'" I"'\, 82' '''J 1001 I "'7 10"1 '''' \ "" \ \ \.
\ \ ",.37 'i ,,\ "" I, 310. - -1
1-, _-\_1,--JTI -f---C-I-r
'\ 'i \, __ \ \ __ ------l-,~_ ~ ,\ I" l !lL6, 9]2 938 ~Q6 r0
10
\ ( 3101 \ ,\ I' 1 I ---,~ l ~(.., I J I ,--
\ \ 3117 \, '\ -~ ',;, J_l ___ ) ,'-\11[' /n B
• \ '''' \_';,;'~ -II -'''' " !\~T31~'! /"-TTT-" ,c;;7 (,JI,,,-.J-11~[~i-l:TL
!__ ..... __ ~, _\.'\,\' __ _ __ '01 \,_ ,,,--,,,,,,-; /' G1071 ,_TOJ I 1m ll",;?;i \ L -.J ,-:"'-J_..l_
'.Il\3211 ;.. '\ 60;./ '1-\62'01' r;",-, ! ---" -J..j "y ~::: I I ~ \\ "'./'" "'\/ G---! I "'-""----------,-==-=.------~' -
\
'/4-MILC --_ ~.~ --r2L-~-L;~!lJ------~-?\\'f\ ~,,~ ,I /I~.! l=1 I :::: 1--\?(7WN.sTR~ \ I, ~iD----------JJiT\>-;' \/,) ___ ~L _L ....J_~) \L31~ / I-
I f 01 "'T >, 'I .... \1 JI~~-' 'lTO' m\'\ ~TII ; ;j~-I ~ , ',,--
II
i
,L 7 --, --\U-1'1 .11 _L 1629:J~-:'z~/(~1'l_tL hl1~I'31 I ;;:-! ---/1
1_ hili \ ,I 3 I ] I IJ" r r I T31 I 33m 1"02' 33"~ L i PANTHER CREEK I '~-'" ~:4u 4"1 "'I. :1, __ "00 ~ iL,_ _ ~:I ~~ 1_, , ' , ", 07! .ll3~~t:,'.,lO.' ,J L I I"~ '31' \,'\, '32' --J f.."~ I I,--~--=--=:,~? C~~13:i! ~-
,I *" J>~I , !"ljU'_",' __ -' GITt:;I' ,llgl~',~,'\:'l"r"J:'( i 934 \I,oo,r p
l",[-\ ir.:" ~7J.L L L "-----L__ :~ ~ L "V' ® ~~ ~I • l ---.--.-tt..,.:.:~ I ·I~--~ G4~Tl407J r--
\ ~_ _ I 1;)<.1"'"' ~p~ lsfS"fl""-1821
4\ ,456',1
1
"" I l'-
__ " ~ ..... -.-. ~ ~ :10400 I ~' v"-' "" -, ~-r' l r-\ f __ II I I -;.TORM 80~1~-~' I ~J46211'l4t9
f---
I
\ /1 3407 17()2!! I L ~-I I'" -'2 ~42!j7 --",\'419 /' I 'I ., ---~l;-' t I-~~"~;:~, I --=\ ."
1
I' ----" -', "'-----'--'1' ~(-'-!;r-,[.;:~--:-:-~~~7----!':~~-] t __ -!+_ ,_ ' ' _ J I J 1,-'7 ~ __ L~
I --~--, I --I"~, C--~-0-~-,"r;-""s-----'1. __
35(10 I 35<11 I I, 3502 . ' 137071 ;;j~.r~3'-~:r----r -~ ~ _ _ ~
401 o 200 401 Faet
WGS_'984 _Web_Mercator _Auxiliary_Sphere
Infonnation Technology· GIS
RentonMapSuppart@Rentonwa.gov
09/24/2013
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and
is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map mayor may not be
accurate, current. or otilerw!Se reliable
THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATlON
E)('HIf3n C DOWNSTREAM DAAll'IP6r'E $YnEM MAP
Legend
City amI County Boundary
~,
Ci CIty.,ft.noon
Addresses
Parcels
bJ Wetlands
100' Primary
100'Intermediale
20' Primary
20'InLermediale
5' Primary
5' Intermediate
2' PrImary
2' Intermediate
structur8
Cllehb""n_T)'po \
• C.lehbo~"-T)'Jl.\l
Cone .. WC"b , __ T,,..~
Oo,,'n'"
eo""bo, .. _T,po'MH
U"' ........ , Un""""",S.".",,,,.
"""""~"_T_ I
""_..,_T_'l
Cc"""",...::.",,,, •• -TYPO'
Dr.pl"~'
eo"""","", _ Ty,.. 2 MH
"'*' Uo."
~
~,
UnI<Io.ow<oS"."' ....
Cat&hbo .... _ T,po'
"""'h"""_T,,.. 2 "'"
CootrolStructl.lre
• R-o"",.IoIoI ... 1noO
® PrlntoIyMo"," ... <f
II Pump Slalio ...
Olllfall
• R-o .. ""M .. ""I<ooOOutI.,
Notes
None
0
1: 2,403
City of Re:rrto n Wi9
Finance & IT Division
Exhibit D
Flood Plain/Floodway (FEMA) Map
NOTE: MAP AREA
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
('5r n )
KING COUNTY
UNINCORPORATED AREAS
530071
E:XHI~T P f"EMA MA P I uF :>
29
APPROXlMAI£ SCAL£ IN rCET
500 0 500
E"'< E3 =
NATIONAL fLOOO INSURANCE PROGRAM
ROOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AND
INCORPORATED AREAS
NUMB~ ~MEL ~UlII'( -.~, -
MAP NUMBER
53033C09J9 f
MAP REVISED:
MAY 16, 1995
Federal Emcrg~ncy Management Agency
8'07"
f:c.: .. : .,;,
\;~,L'[ -/' .:
~~
I-~
t~~
Identified
1983
LEGEND
SPECIAL fLOOD HAZARD AKEAS INUNDATED
BY lOO-YEAR FLOOD
ZONE A
ZONE AE
ZONE AH
ZONE AO
No 1),1:.(: flo<Jd f:'lh.ltIIJIlS del~'rrnjlled.
Il.,JSt-' (hlud d!'\.·.lli,)fl~ dl'I.'rmillt'd.
Flood depth, Hi
,II pundingl:
rI('It'rmined.
I II' "\ il;'f'l IU~\hllly .'H',IS
h,lSI;' fb:)(j dl'\:,l1 illll;'
FI\)o<! depths of 1 II> 3 ted '.u~uaIlY ~hE'('l
flo"\' "11 ~I!)ping tt'rrJin); ,l\'cr.l);(' depths
d(>I('rmilll'd, f"r .Irl',h of a!lu\i,li fan fJoodill~
wind/if's ,,1-..:) de1t'rmin{'fL
ZONE A99 Tn r)(' pf~lt£.'\ It'd from 100-y('<!r flood by
Feder,1I flood proif;'rl ion ~y:.tl'm undf'r
nmSlrlllli(ln: 11(, b,lSC ('k'\r,]tinn~ ddl'rmilwd.
ZONE V
ZONE VE
Co,)~I,)1 fI"od with wk,cil), h<l/,nrJ I ..... ,J'"
,Ietioo); no b,he (loud ('k'~<llirH1;' determined.
c(),}Sldl nnud with Vl'lutll\" h.l.!:ard Iwav\"'
dcliuni: b,lSC 11()()(! dl'\Jtir)ll~ dl"lerminl'd.
FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE At
OTHER FLOOD AREAS
ZONE X ,\1"(',15 of 500-),€.1f flood: arl'.IS nf ·IOO-ye.:lr
f1o()d with ,lVerdge d<'plhs of Jess tn,ln
1 fool ()f with cirain.:<ge afP,IS leS!> th.:<n
1 ~quarl' mile; ,md areas proL!;'cll'cl by
leVl'('~ (rum lOO-\""i',lf (/{){)d.
OTHER AREAS
ZONE X
ZONE 0
AnSI~ dct!;rmineu tu be nutsick SOO-year
floodplain.
Afca~ in which 1I()()d hazards <If('
undetermined.
UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS
r~'····1
Identified
1990
[~~-';'<I I ............. "
Coastal barner areas are normally located within or
;:lood Halard Areas.
Otherwi!>e
Protected Ared5
adjacef'lt to Special
Flood Boundary
FloOdway Boundary
Zone 0 Boundary
Boundal)' Dividing Special flood
Hazard Zones, ood Boundary
Dividing Areas of Different
Coastal Base flood Elevations
WJthin Special Flood Hazard
EXHH3lT D fEVlA ~f> ~ Of
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
500 0 500
E3 f""""4 E5 I
NATIONAL fLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AND
INCORPORATED AREAS
PANEL 979 Of 1725
iSEE MAP INOEX FOA PANELS NOT PRJNTED)
kl''IT. CITY Of
kiNG COOOl)'
UtliNGORPOAATW AflEAS
J\£IHON.CrTY OF
~ PANEL SUFFIX
6JOO8Q 1);19
5300/1 0019
&3001lB 1);'!9
MAP NUMBER
53033C0979 F
MAP REVISED:
MAY 16,1995
Federal. Emergency Management Agency
This is an official copy ota portiOfl of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F-MITOn-Une. This map does not reflect changes
Of amendments which may haYe been mac!e subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov
3
~~513~
(O) (O)
IEL 987)
RM7 X
• M2
970 07'30", 32'22'30"
Bas8 Flood Elevation Line:
E.levation in Feet. See Map Index
for Elevation Datum.
Cross Section Line
Base
Where
Flood Elevation in
Uniform Within
Feet
Zone.
See Map Index for Elevation Datum.
Elevation Reference Mark
Riyer Mile
Horizontal Coordinates Based on Nor1.h
American Datum of 1927 (NAD 271
Projection.
NOTES
This map is lor use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program;
it does not neceasanly identify all areas supject to flooding, particularly from
local drainage sources of small size. or all planimetric features outside
Special Flood Hazard Areas,
Coastal base flood elsvtltions apply only landward of 0.0 NGVD, and include
the effects 01 waye action: these elevations may also dllfet Significantly
from those developed by the National Weather Seryice for hurricane
evacuation planning.
Areas of Special Flood Ha~ard (lOO-year flood) include Zones A. AE. AH, AO.
A9S, V. and VE.
Certain areas not in SpeCial Flooel Hazard Areas may be protected by
flood control suuctures.
Boundaries of the 1J0odways were computed at cross sections and
interpolated between cross sections. The floodways were based on
hydraulic considerations with regard to requirements of the J-'ederal
Emergency Management Agency.
Floodway widths in some areas may be too narrow to show to scale.
Floodway widths are provided In the Flood Insurance Study Repqrt.
This map may incorporate approximate boundaries 01 Coastal Barrier
Resource System Units and lor OtherA'ise Protected Areas established
under the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 (PL 101--591).
CorporaLe limits shown are current as of the date of this map. The user
should cOntact appropriate community officials to determine if corporate
limits have changed subsequent to the issuance of this map.
For community map revision history prior to countywide mapping, see
Section 6.0 of the Flood Insurance Study Report.
For adjoining map panels and base map source see separately printed
Map Index.
MAP REPOSITORY
Refer to Repository Listing on Map Index
EFFECTIVE DATE OF
COUNTYWIDE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP:
SEPTEMBER 29,1989
EFFECTIVE OATE(S) OF REVISIONIS) TO THIS PANEL:
Re\lised Mav 16. 1995 to update map format.
E)l..HIg,IT D F f:MA (VIAl" 3 I>F.3
500
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
o 500
:J
NATIONAL FlOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AND
INCORPORATED AREAS
PANEL 979 OF 1725
ISEE MAP INDEX FOA PANElS NOT PRII,n I'DJ
NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX
I!.XMll oo,~
aJOOn III" ~ 0019
MAP NUMBER
53033C0979 F
MAP REVISED:
MAY 16,1995
Exhibit E
Assessors Map
~;;;----
. ,
J;:",.?S '1
31. 79_64 85
R",,39 4
'2C 4,9.01
.\t.->-
\\,i.,
~\\'1'--
R",949 -
9~.~
VOL. 1441~u.· 97.06 50 35
~
·'w;;,
'J>hh 1I11U
,N ~ 20 ~ 19 ~
-cP,\IO ~8.OgS1~~Ttj,=L __
R~130 S 89-27-34 E -~.-_13l
1<3-::-"-T---:"-"""'~-. -.' 3? 4S 1?71fi 1 ____ l?""ioO",
T;C1 TR. A " ,.., ",'1 3 . De
~ 7.4 ,'~:;~,~. ,,,'" 22.9 S
N
m 7465 ~}.:og
,.\~.--<.,.....,.,.~
f16 "" 36.7~ ~(,.Cl'{,:!il 'i. .. :.,.34.t.
,~
N 10
~ _'~:,~' !,w "":-,
~ COMM. ., TR. B ~ w
~
~
rl 0
rl
rl
~
~
0190 ~
rl
~
~
1'0 1 TR.D::NQ ~ 2 I~
n o
OJ
Z
GO
rl
;::
I
'I -;;;
'(5 13
I", , OJ
iii I",
'H
;~
iii z
~
~
" ~
,I if :,.;
" I
[,):
~
c:'
N
~ ,
:':'i,;~,~ " . ,
;-~ , .,
Lt: I •
c ~
~
"' 23
'" o
>-'
'" W
'"
PROP.
TYPE II ~
14286 5.-1'-" 9776 S
0550 S 89-17-34 E 43
,._J'p--,J._ •. _ .• ~ ••. _.'.L._ .. L.i.'-,2..._
N. LN. S 1/2 -NE'-SE
o o rl
.1
5371
0010
.44 (P)
·_A_2.--
rl
2
.iq770 SF
0020
--.!~.
~ 3 0
rl
5285 S
0030
50 .. ....,..---~-.
;; 4
4449
0040
_.45
W
N ,,"'i-,
I, r; .," .'::~,~'
_---.B-:"~.D __
266.52
45.09
51,59
*'7" :~"W5 ..... If) 45.81
' •• ';;: 0 N N "",..-, '~'
',I 1 -' .-l I.fl '-"'U ,...; J" 0.1 If) I.,. w 6 "."5:'7 0 r-' • ~ 11
:,' VI I.""""; 8 ffi 9 ~ 1 a ~
I 0050 0060 0070 0080 0090 0100 6108 S
w
~b
.'"
o
?
"",
: 12
~
rl
;:::"''''" o(c!,:.:.!
I
·f"lo.....-!<I"n
Ul £ ~i~ 611~ 5cMl00
N rl :j:z
13 "?ilJ ~1!2_~...i....~~~QZ ~ ~-.t--1 -409-,-41
rl """:JjLrl
~ z";:f": ol~
'i:~ E-o
rl .,,;,'"
5291,
0020
"
I I ~ ~ W l J~~583 s 6400 S~ 5737 SF 4519 S 4362 S 5166 slrl
[435.60] ,~ S 89-7-34 I:t 1.63 (pj 0110
I '17)~;;" ;';;'--7-." ;;2~'l'_?~';:~ ;.-r-~--~~-':----_A~ii8-!-
43560 SF
1. 00 AC
9039 0120 0130 ,'~: ~ 7747 SE953 S'~ ~
,. .
•• 1.Q___ ~~...;..~}jiW
-~-----j:;;:!
I>J"£:TLlIND
,')'U'
o o
rl
1.0 AC
Q017
o a rl
"A"
, I RNSPI
j::;
, I
i~ :Z ! , t SliT:: "J 21. 04 _S------SB--2~24--._W_ -
00'-
w 21. 04 ; 53
o va,'-0
",," rl
1.0 AC
435 9031 r-...
,""",;/77,',7, ,. "/,,,,7777777777'77,
~o 0
c','
1. 78
9071
g. 4<l.89 : 54 :~'l. _. -"
N;"TR C' ;,-":-"2"··' !ffi '. N ''1" ~ ~O~~ AC ~;iit ; 5;;;: ~\ 60' BtlF
5087#
9192
-! 4:6.15 --. -'5-
~~f!.Jf:L .. L.,r,..L. • .L .• ,£ •• ,,c. •. ='-tr.".£''''_.;':'' .. ,",~.L ... e. ... & •.. J: .. ~_'''''_ • .L._" .. L ... ~ .. .£ •. ....&. • ....",r._/._.C_ . ...::.. ... e::. •.• L .. ..J. .. ·_ .. ·_ ... _ .. ·_ ... ..J.f·!!.. .. ·_ .. _ .. ·_ .. ·_ .. ·_ .. :t ;,-----.;...--~----~~---:"'---.
~
~
~ w
• ,
170
LOT 1
';."<
~\~ ~~ w + :.:I~ ,
302305
KG 7803311125 SP 1177127
LOT 2
:I~
<2j~,
"":i,
~,
~ ::::r
" Ol~ N~
I' rll
Z
~i:a~ '1,', I...] ~""!5 :1; _0 n
'" ir--~
.!i: ~
IS' C,I,'
6
1:
5.
/2 0
_75
25
14 2 66 AC :~ 16
giOS !~
0.60 AC \ .~f 5137#
g 15 .', ::;:; I~
••• -... -... _.\.CQ ... -... -:..~=.-... -t:: .. -... -... -... -... -... -... -... -... -... _ ... _ ... _ .. -... -._ ... _ ... _ ... _ ... _ ... _ ... _ ... _ ... -... _ ... _ ... _ ... -.. '-"'-'''-''-''-'''-'''-'''-",;r1~~
rn
E-XH 151T E A~~E¥:£R2 tqAP j~~
" !.CALlE .. I -100 :itg~ II ... 3.13 AC :';i~rl
9021 'Li"\
4500-/i ~ 5998lt 5
0150 0140 [
50 50
TI
Wetlc
Exhibit F
Sensitive Areas Information
AQUIFER PROTECTION ZONES
I;;)(H IBiT F-Renwn Munici pa l Code
Zone 1
~ Zone 1 Modified
c:==:J Zone 2
---Citv Limils
City of Renton Sensitive Areas
Flood Hazard
,/ J 'I
Publ ic Works Departmen t
G. Zimmerman, Admi nistrator
Technica l Services
R. MacOnie, D.Visneski
Ponied on May 21,2009
Data SoU!~~: Pub i e WorM. U~I;~ .. s S)'SlerJ19. Ta~hnic ~1 Sl!<Vices
-----"1 ilJ'tDIl ~
',<00 2,!OO "
1 , " ,
""_ .. ..--_ ...... -_ ..... _ ... _r .. __ -,,"----_._ .. '"'-_ ...
[~J "_OOr'_
B<HII3IT f
Hazard Condition
~ c" Flood Hazard
Critica l Infrastructure
A Poli r:e Depanmenl
("i Fire Stations
V valley Medical Ce nter
Schools
COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS
Technical Services
Planningl8uildinglPubli ~ Works
R. MacOnie, D. Visneski
January 22, 200B
E)<.HI~IT f
-----City Limits
H igh Haza rd
_ Moderate
c:::::J Unclassified
I
City of Renton Coal Mine Hazard Area
I
, \ \; 1 \ ~ '\J Ll J JJ-UUJJJ~) \~~ -~'-L ),1', ~~~ --~. -. -:-J:J \trO--D c " " ~-\ ~ L -1 (1 0 0] -I L-
, .,'.... -..., .... /2 j". J L-
" ',,') \ SI1" b _[[[CLL J r [
-
. i Ir ··· -v I \ l C 1 -.,w.~ ':.,:' \) .' -'.J L I-....... , Z lO r ' \ ~ j~ c ! j \~ I-I .-:1 ---,. .•.•. ---, I '1 _. 1 I 1-L_ / L I ( __ I l > ",.j \ I~ Lr ' "'-.~"." II O __ I __ D.
I j ~ r J :'::::t -j 0 L ~ n ClT,r~
I J 0 ,---R I U L~ \ ---~ . -r\
r-/ _ ---L_ .. ~ _~-_~ n _ . ..J L \. ... -·· ... f .. ··',_J J \-~-_1_,.\ Ir---J n:rr------t::i-j L CJ' \Sr ---:0J\D\JP:~( LUJJ:nL ---j L L J I . Lf ~, QI1TLlItD\ r--c c D.:...J rj--j C J~ J
1 I _l J I J -j t-=..I _J -·'l
, ,:, L :} CJ--/ i ,1-:'1 ~~ I,L e, 9JJ/ ,--
Notes Legend
None City and County Boundary o Urban Cons!!rvanc~
Othe r o J urisdictions
[j City of Renton Streams (Class ified)
0 I-I Parce ls -,
Coa lmine -2
HIGH -3
1: 3,695 0 MODERATE 4
I
UN C LASSIFIED EJ Wetlands 308 0 154 308 Feet
WGS_1984_ W eb_M ercato r_A uxiliary _Sphere Enllironment Designations
n Natural
Cityof~ton ~ This map is a user generated stanc output from ailin/ernet mapping site and Information Technology -GIS
Renton MapSupport@Rentonwa.g o v
is for reference on ly Data layers thai appea r on thi s map mayor may nol be
accurat e, cur rent or otherwise reliab le.
Finance & IT Divi sion 9/26/20 13 TH IS MAP IS NOT TO BE U SE D FOR NAVIGA TIO N
SEISMIC HAZ ARD AREAS
Technical Services
Planningf8uildin~Public Works
R. MacOnie , D, Visnesl<.i
Janua ry 22, 200B
EXHIBIT f
-----City Lim its
Hig h Hazard
\
"
, ,
Ii I ;--r
•
; •
~-~;
, t· ~
c.l~. . ,
; ~ 1
I ~ ... ,'
,
;,
,-; J
City of Renton -Water classes
e E".nomic De\"elopm~nt, Ne Ighborhoods & Strategic Plannmg
+!.m • Alex Pietsch,. Adminis~cor ~ G "'''_0 DRAFT NT IS October 2003
~ 1" 'j
_-1 { 1
I • ~! '" ... ,
fA'i~!I __ ~.I"'~ J
"
Renton City Boundary
PM 8cundal'j
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Class 4
Cubcrt
:
o
. " , .
~~ f •
t
.I } ~.
(
'.
'\ ~~ ~~"
~ 'l, -,.
,..... ...1,
,,~_,. ... : I
" t·
" \
r .
,.. .... , <
11..·-·,.·,..-
"
, , .
r '-'-'~'-;"-
I
,!
I
I
i
, i
. r-J
3000
~ » "'''!
6000
:
I : 36000
City of Renton Sensitive Areas
Public Works Department
G. Zimmerman, Administrato r
Technica l Services
R. MacOnie, D. Visneski
Pri n ted on May 21 , 2009
Data Sour~: Pub~o We""", Ubl~'e~ Sys1 ems, Techni",,1 Services
----JGIitUfl" , 1::)(.\11511 F
Sio
o 1 • ..:1 :1.1100' "",,,, ,
... _ .. _ ... ---_. ...... -..,~ ...... -" .. --__ ~ ... __ ..... "w __ ",---,
[~] Renton City Limits
Steep Slopes Percentage Range
>15% & <=25%
>25% & .::=40%
ell >40% & <=90%
" >90%
I
C ity of Ren ton Steep Slopes I
"'--
-_ '. ----.::::::... . /' 734 \ ) _._ \ 1-------. ~ ~. Iv--"~--, ... -.. -.. -.---.. ( 720 /' .' •• -----1-0 -
\
f---[ L'J B [ r
703 731
3300 709 715 ~~j 723 729
1 -_J I-
\ (:,\IE 7 3320 --------
3340
\ 3330 ~ fl{~\·r c -I
I -r -
,-
(909 I
.~ 3400 ~;F~l'" -\ --. --I
\ --f--------_.---.. -
~500 G ,--.-
35 02
1 ~508 \ 1-
\
I
3506 'I 3507 r-.. --\ "'-,-
I /' "'-................... ,
Notes Legend
None City and County Boundary • :>40%& .:=90%
Other • >90%
Cj Cily of Renton Environment Designations
0 Addresses 0 Natural
I' Parcels 0 Shoreline Higj1 lntenslty
Slope City of Renton 0 Shoreline Isolated High Intensity
1 :1,847 >15"0 & <:=25% 0 Shoreline ReS idential
I
>25% &. <=40% (Sensrtive) 0 Urban Corlse rv;:m~y 154 0 77 154 Fee t
WGS_ 1984_ Web_Mercator_Auxiliary _Sphere • ,..40% &. <=90% (Protected) 0 Ju risd ict ions • ,.90% (Prcte~led) StrF!::lm~ ((,;I::l~~ifip.rl)
CityofR-etnOn e Information Technology . GIS This map is a user generated s:alic ou tput fram an Internel mapping site and
RentonMapS upport @Rentonwa ,gov
is for reference on ly, Oal a la~ers that app ear on tl1is map may Of ma y no t be
accurate , cu rr ent, or othel'W'ise reliatl le .
Finance & IT Divi sion 912612013 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION
--
City of Renton Sensitive Areas
Erosion Hazards
1
Pub lic Works Department
G. Zi mmerma n, Ad minislralor
Technica l Services
Do nna ann Visneski, ES3
Prin ted on May 2 1, 2009
Dat~ Soorc ~: Pubfi e WQrks. Ub ~te s Syst ems . Tech ni c:<l l Se rv ices
~"'TtltyoC. ~
-----_h.3 SlIDIl ~
a I,~ l.ooo · ,,',',' , HAZARD CONDITION .. _ ... _._---
~.....,-... -... --_ .... __ .... _._ .. '"'--... .r:r--I ['l. ...... "" ........
EXHIBIT f
Criti ca l Infrastructure
1\ Pol ice Dep a rtment
$ F ire Sta ~on s
V \ho me y Me tic81 Centel
1 Schaols
City of Renton Sensitive Areas
Landslide Hazard
1
Public Works Department
G. Zimme rman , Administrator
Technical Services
R. MacOnie, D. Visneski
Prtnte<j on May 21, 200 9
Data Source Pu b&<:: Work:t. Uhlitiu S~"lems, i&Chnica l S"""iC8S
C I~ :z.='
, " , ! " , ,
... _ ...... ----:..-::=..,=.:::. ... "':=
I~? Renton City Lim its
EXfil51T t-
LANDSLIDE HAZA RD CRIT ICAL FACI LITIES
Severity j\
• Very Hig h
_High
Mode rate
Unc l assified
Po li co Department
Fire Statio n s
V Va ll ey Med i ca l Cen ter
Sc hoo ls
Reference 11-A
Peak Rate Flo w Control Standard (Existing Si te Condi tions)
Flow Control Application Map
Prin ted 1114120 10 a 2 ___ =::::JI_-=::::i ______ Mi les --r Ci t y of .. _ ~ ------~r _ ~n r un ~
'E;:XHI(3IT r-
L
SE lICtt r
N
A
MERCER
Renton Municipal Code ~ Creeks
~ Rivers City Boundary
W;~%.~m Lakes _ _ _ Municipality Boundaries
For Reforence Only
1 Inch -1 Mile 1.
I ' I ill
Roads
Wetlands
Renton Wetlands
r;xrt!5 IT F
Exhibit G
SWM Division Drainage Investigation Information
-...'-....-., ......
...........
GO =
()
~~---~-----
t)
/' I
\-----.,.,1
S'~(\' 2/ [H.s.1
S • ..,2~nIST
iMAP
S22"40CT
'" ~
" ...
3i oc u
j ...
S2l!10ST
S25T,[ ST
S23T1I CT
sa~"'Tt[ Sf
\
5<7r;, p(
,
':J.~\ ... c,
Renton
~------@ l
szaTrt s::t.
J~",
'-'l.<l;.
',\-
-----------.,~.,
% -f(,
0'
-'{\'.
oS>
'"
~
" -, '.
'0
C-.,
.'!'
~
~ ':\ -'
':.
'"
S21't'l S'
-:,'!b1.'r\C1:
,; z<i1" (.1
';)~"""r"""
530iH Gl
IS' C)
'1>0
")
~
~
~
~ "l-
L' ~
<j,
oJ'
1 )
'?' \ ~~------S31ST ST S::ilSTCT
--,-I
~'---!
; "> t
" S.l2.NOPL
+ ~
;. ..
(Cl200!l KIn'ij County
-" ?i
" z
~
$1'1' :i41 H ~r
« l -" '
IcomPl ai nt #1 \-
1989-0563 -7- -
1-\"omplaint
/1#1991 -0929
l
---<
" M
'" S~TlI ST
!>'
" '. ..
'" t S.:iZN O ST
'" ~ "-'''' "'l
,-.. ,~
#1990-0353
SITE
) 01 '1005tt
"' ~ -.
~
"
The information in cl uded o n th-is -map has been co tnpllCd by -King County staff from a variety of sources and is subjecllo change withou t notics. King County ma kes no represen tations o r
warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, comp lel eness. timeliness, or rights to the use of s uch information . Th is document is not in te nded for use as a survey product. King County I ~
sha ll not be liable for any !;Ieneral, special . indirect. incidental , or consequential damages inclu ding. but not li mited to. lost reve nues or lost profits resulting from the use o r misu se of the ,. K".ng County
in formation contained on th iS map. An y sale of th is map or information on this map is prohibited except by wri tlen permission of King County. .
Date: 9125 /2013 Source: King County iMAP - Stormwater (http://www.metrokc.gov/G ISJiMAP )
EXHIB IT G SWM DI VISION DRA INAGE INVESTIGATI ON INFORMATION
I
Ree Complaint No Problem Type Reed Date Close Date
Drainage Complaints
Add ress PIN Comments
2
19 90 -0353 DIVERSID e 1/16/1990 2/16/1990 17020 SPRINGBROOK RD SE 302305907 1 NEW PLAT DIVERT DRA IN AGEfSTORM
1991-0929
19 91-0929
1989-0563
FLOODI NG I e
FLOODING SR
FlOG e
8/16/199 1 8/28/1991 17024 SPRINGBROOK RD S 302305904 1 i DITCH BY PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
8/16/199 1 12124 /1992 17024 SPRINGBROOK RD S 302305904 1 TO CIP
8/1/1989 11 /28/1989 3211 TALBOT RD S 302305901!)!NEW PLAT ROAD WATER FLOWING OVER ROAD !
Exhibit H
City of Renton Soils Survey Map
Reference 11-C
~
~ • •• .. . , ..
• -... • • ,
~.I -"" -
." •• , -
City of Renton Soil Survey Map
Public Works
Surface W ater Utility
G. Del Rosari o
12 /2212009
0 .5
Mile s
\
\
~
o Grounawater ProtectionArc a Boundary
A",ffe< Prot ection Area Zone 1 o Aqu ifer Prol e<;(ion Are a Zone 1 Moo fted
l:':.j R onton City limits
~
N
Exhibit I
Off-Site Analysis Drainage System Table, As-built drawings and
Photos
OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE
SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2
Basin: {1,~c.K f2..IV&R. Subbasin Name: PAN1'HB&-0R~'E\<' Subbasin Number:
Symbol Drainage Drainage Slope Distance Existing Potential Observations of field
Component Type, Component from site Problems Problems inspector, resource
Name, and Size Description discharge reviewer, or resident
see map Type: sheet flow, swale, drainage basin, vegetation, % X ml -1,320 ft. constrictions, under capacity, p~nding, tributary area, likelihood of problem,
stream, channel, pipe, cover, depth, type of sensitive overtopping, flooding, habitat or organism overtlow pathways, potential impacts
pond; Size: diameter, area, volume destruction. scouring, bank sloughing,
surface area sedimentation, incision, other erosion
(j) l~,t/!:/'l:!:~I~. w Sl.f IS I-CI'E T'>1"'" 0' NON"f ,,,aNi: ~RO oj P()UN'O IWORTti
S6Lf 1& OIt,.C.PE
2.':1: C<>v.,~ t.lWDSR AC.
t 'S %-1: rVo#/f: tJoAlf hJD PROi;LEtI' F'OUNQ . ,"-D, oF' TAL&oT RI7.
@ T'I\'t IL C(7,lI2h/t&-S B6 ' NOW"& tJ°/JE ~O PRlll3l,EJVI f"oIA.N.12
71JI-r 1<.." Rep I =t:~"1 T~_10' '-d. $. 5,·1: NoN"t: HoNE-tJ 0 [71<.0 ~1_EJVl FOIAJJD
@ o~T 1'N-L -cu $WAIS
w 'R1PRAP PAo 15b' NoN&: Noll/:; t-JD PRogLeM FouN9
5w",LL, UI-"3<> "';~ft • .itUo.V'I IO/p-:!;. No~"f /VDNt: I 'tJO PRDw ~ ri>V!NJ)
® >"'~ .. ~f:""5es v
55b' iVotJt NO F'Rb1bl..:&-1 fc,ukJ.i7 -tu. L, uJ \,IO/,)6 ,
VAL.L:&"I, 10:"1[, 'of«+> NONe /JON[:. I tJ v PRl7B/.:E;M Fol.{M7
® ~~on P'" ":~ ... -hJ
.
IO"zo,i.t. 7 56' NotJ"& ll-..lI7 P/'ZD pJ r.M "F"ol.{ND NoN!:
PANTttEK C.REiSj( }JDN& tJoN"& 1'10 PRo {1)]:;M Fot.tNl7
(6) 1/4 milt. JOIAm~~ IJoI wGf LAND AIt.t;A 1'/. ± /:;go' /JONE ~ OI.J1i: NO f'RD [Z} f:.M "Ftv A lD
pl7iwb
-
SE~ EXHIBIT C DOWNST~M OAAINJerE: 5'l'.7iCM MAr F/.I~ SYMSoL,$
119/2009
-
J' 'J
! I, b I!I I!i I! ! I! I ! I;
" .. ~ fi' , "'" ""'"
\ ~. \,
l\~ ~~ ~\ I.
'~ \~\
ill
,!
\ & \\ I I~ ,~
\~ .',\ I'
\\ ~ t~\
...
I.
~ I' \.-.....
\. .~ ~" h I~
"'" ~ "
1'''--"
I'
l\
f'n< ~ '" """'"
! _I 5 L! I 'I 1;1 I! ! I I ! I !
I
-
"'---,---
!f
·f
,.-. ,~' ;
:' .
8NV7 8/83H:1
'~"rJ
-~-. ..--.tr_ ....... :-:t--
\
; j .
1 • i
~ o
N
...J
..J o
0:::
· I
S7IY1Ja IlIYA .J!)'(N!j'8(} IlWiS
3NY'! 3l113U:;
061£' Ot· au .....
-,"i~ :1"
(
Talbot Road South East roadside ditch and 12 " RCP culvert und er driveway to th e site
18" LCPE pipe in ditch lead ing to CB#3 1 (R-22880E), catch point for o ns it e runoff and
starting point of downstream analysis STA 0+00
CB #26 ,H6-8 (R-22880E), STA 0+86, with 12 " RCP crossing Talbot Road South
ST A I +56 ±, Outfall of 12" RCP at the west s ide of Talbot Road Sout h
Drainage swa le cha nges to a va ll ey near the Panther Creek
Single family residence on sit e
, "
Gravel driveway to det ention/wet va ult at the n011h side of the cul-de-sa c ofS
for Cherie Lan e subdivision of the site
"
, ---. . -.. '~" ~ . . -.~~ .--
Detention/wet vault in the cul-de-sac of S 34 th Place for C herie Lane subdi v is ion
upstream of the si te
CB #28 (R-22880D) in the public utility easement in parcel 302305-9 \ 08
CB#30(R-22880E) in the public utility easement in parcel 302305-9108
Exhibit J
Site Plan of Talbot Road South Short Plat
\
I
II \
\., I
IUJ \ IW
\~
I
I
\
I
I
\
I:.' \
1\< I \ ~ .• :\ i I
I· . \
I( I I
~I
lui J C\.. \ 0:", c\
~_ I
IS. LI
CUR'o£ TABlE
LOT UNE SETBACKS:
FRONT YARD SETBACK 15'
REAR YAIfD SET SACK 2rt
SIDE YARD SET BACK 5'
WEllAND BUFFER SETBACK 15'
F-w~aOlT ItECjOIl-2~~S10M
I...... \ \-_. . I p. I
I \. ,
\
\ \ '. I' I I 79:55-.--21.21
• _ \: ~ \-10" SEII.£R EASENEHT REl::IlO-2l-5-SU)02R
l.l.~
I , •
! ~
40 02040 80 P-w...... . . Mil
QlAPHC~
SCALE< T-8O'
WIDE CONe. SIDEWALK
. - . -~S;;:; I Tr ~._-.C5' S.Y. SETBACK~. ____ _
1-'n;.'Jjf~r l,r+~.~<'uloYP~i
SETBACK(lYP.)
~ SENSITIVE AREA TRACT 1495 SF
~L.ANDSCAPE AREA
"
~~-==--
~ WE1L\ND BOUNDARY SURVEYED
WETlAND BUFFER INTERPOLATED WEnANO BUFFER
E)c"H1511 J SllE PLAN
SCALE' 1" "" eO'
!r l iij~ 1 1
•
'I" Iii! Ii ; ; Itl··
'Ii III !I!! ~'! Iii! !. '+ ... I,
I!d iii ~! i! ,;1
-. '" II! . 'ii ,II !!I ~ • 11 .~! i i j.~ -, ,.j I~i Ii h I'lli:~ ~& j! "'::I ~Ol ~-->
'II'~ 11''!!'ill' " , 1'1" ~"'~Il ,'il!1 I i : .;1: ,!I: ! '>!ii: t II ,1 li'~ii :1 II ish i =I i , !,!I~,! Ii , l!~i': ~! I I! ~ , I' ,il"! 11 • i \
l<:: !::!~ i I! .ii,!i! I, il'il ' . , I! I r'g Ii '~i I i i : :iJ ! i I i I " ,
------
!Il
i'
()
::;
-< <-
:P
0 :z: .,... .,.,
;u ~ m "" z = ..... +0-0 z
TALBOT ROAD S. SHORT PLAT
C!TY OF RENTON
-STREEn------
-----------
i
I
~
~ o z
o ..,
z m
~
);:
o ..,
'" m
~
);:
o ..,
'" m r
'" .0
:-I
t:l z
;:u
o
'" m
Pacific ' ..... '''RD AVE. C' Engineering ~~1JE~E, WA 981
Design, LLC ~~( 431-7970
(206}MB-1648
WEBSITE:
Civil Engineering and PACENG.COM
Planning Consultants
APPROVALS: DEPARlM~T OF ASSESSMENTS RECORDING NO. VOL./pAGE
CITY OF RENTON DEPAlmlEHT ~ OE\-tLa>UDIT AND DMRONYENTAL SOMaS
SHORT PLAT NO. EItWIINED ANI) JiIf'fftNF1) 1MS -~, ~ ____ 20-EXMaIED AND AI'I'A(MI) lHS -"" ~ ---_ "'-
RENTON. WASHINGTON DI\fCltIR, LAHO USE SSMI:ES DMSION.o.ssESSOR SCALE: 1 IMCB -40 n. jil"~ i .0 I eo '
~ NCI ~ THIS __ ~". ____ m __
IIEF'IITY ASSESSOR PORTION OF
OWNER'S DECLARA nON
DE.\£lCIP\EIIfDaGR MXlOUNTNJNIIEIt NE 1/4 of SE 1/4, S . .30 T. 2.3 N .• R. 5 E .• W.M.
LUA ---SHPL
~ .lI.L PEOPLE En' THESE P!lESOO'S TKl.T WE THE I.MJEJ!9CI£I), 0WtGS LND 20-
~~~M=~~~DOTH~IMKE'" (IDf[fW NOm ImAl QfSCBlpngN
I!EPR£SEWATION or M SI'IE. AHO lJiO,T THE SHOIIT ~ IS IMD£
WITH THE f1IE£ COI6ENT..,.., It.! ACCOMWCE WITH TI4E resIRE Of THE 1. ~'R-8 FROt.I FIDEI.m' ~ lIJl[ COYPAN'l' ~ MUIIBER 611051115U
0WWl5.. t ~.~~~~ SNlI..E rJ,I,Il'l' ocr.tCHED. THE EAST fWF Of THE ~ IWF Of THE so.mt IWJ' Of' THE ~ tw.T Of RfffBENCfS
IN WITNESS YI'IIDl!EOF WE SEl"OIJI IoWIDSNClWl.S. ~,~cr=~~~~~~=~rMr. k ~l~~~'tlo.~~.PG(S)83-e.
IOWlIl2 iiNESll,ltNiS FASfMfNIS' ~~ ~~YO:~~lHE: 2.B F'EET AND ~T PORTlOtIlTNJ J. RECOIIO Of SUIM:T RECORDING NUo8ER a31010t0ll
""""" , FOO.J1'J NII'OOtW. TTn.E COW'AIfY IlEGINIe«; I\T THE ~ or THE £o\ST LINE OF TH..DOT R(W) WITH 1\ UN[
DIIoTED: SEPTEMBER .8. lOU :» nET HDImI Of' THE SOl,IIIt UNE 01' SMI SIJIIDIVISIOtI;
ACKNOWLEDGMENT cowt.mIENT IfJI.III(R: &.'06i5M2 = =:~~ ~ ~~SAIIl~
ITDI .0. tI.SDIENT AHO TERWS AND COHOmON T11EREOf:
PlR'OSE: ~ EGRESS olH) lfflUTIES SlfUlt.TE IN THE COlIHlY OF KING. STATE Of ~
IN WITNESS WID£Of WE S['T cut twa)S NIl 5V.LS. AIlE" ...... r=::: ~ge~ F'EET or SND PIIEMISES
ftECORDIItG HIIl.o ~~ -fTEIoI 11: EASEWNT NCllDIK> NIl CCIMtIIII(»,IS TIIEREOF: =m, ~CftEDI S£WER~~ Sl.'II'ER D5IRICT fOl'PNfNT .t pROCEQI IRfS I
~fM:lJ;~~Y,~ Of PII!C£L A ~~ ~~~,.\I.OfSTA~~ tsm I
su,TE Of) RECORDINO 1«).: 9112\»1000 ~~~DicEm STAlE SlNlOMOS AS SI'£C1fIEI)
COUNTYOf' ~ss Erl'W ..... I:.=-I30WIDIRmAAOlOUNE.oIRoINDAHOI.I..o\RCLOSlIftES. ,r"PORESSES' ,IrIJ. MEASlfIItG IIISII1\MJIIS FtIR THIS SUII\IEY HoWE ElEEN II.O.NT.UG
I CERm' lK\,T I I(N)W at HIM: s~:nsrAC1Oln' EWJEMC[ 1HAT ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ PROPERT'I' OWNER: _ TIl!: LAST 12 YDNIHS.
st:lNED THIS D£DIC,>,~ NIl> ~ IT 10 8[ (HS/HEII} nt!E \:f"~u.c
NIl> 'IIOU.IHTAR'I' ICI F'OR Tt£ USES NIl> PUIIPOS!S IiIGinokED ill lHI: SEAm£. WA 118103 ~. PtIOHE:: {2M)a.I\l--M21 :ruu: or BASIS Of BFARING
NCf1'Nn' PUIIJC EmtIEER:
::r~~Of ~=~'tDESCN ~sr:.~~TES.
SUITE 100
TIll[ SEAlTl.£.. WA IIBIM
PHONE: {2Oe)431-~70
"'-~-----SITE ADPRESS-[j !?J ...--.... ?-J!N1l ST.
3340 lALDT I'D. S. ( ----...,r
STATE OF:) IIDIl"ON. WA aeo55 s. ~~s"" '" . COUNTY Of) 682 g
I CEJIIIIFY "DIAl I _ OR HIM: SI(IISFiJ\CTOII'1' tw:ENCE THU iii
SICtmJ THIS llOlICIoD:lIj NIl> ON ()\TH STATED TH,O,T ~ -""s M~ 7 PlAT -S8214 Sot. -U4 ACRES ~tj¥ j JS. 34TH ST.
AI.JIIIORIZUI Ttl EXECI.ITE 1M[ IGTI\!MENI' NIl> ~ IT loS TI£ UIT 2 _ ~ 5.f. ! .
Of UlT3_115D15.f. ~
1CI 11£ TI£ F1Itt NIl> \'OlUMl"M!'I' ICf Of SUCH FWm' RlR THE USES NO UIT 4 -73011 s.F. f!: s. lh iii
PURPOSES ItIEHTIONED IN THE 1NSIltIAENf. ~ ~REAOON NV. TIWlT _ ~7 s.r. Q I sr. ~ <rl =... Of PU!IUC RESIIIOlI1AI. ACCESS SIR[[T (IWF SIW ~ _21t1\l~ s.F. i s. ;J77It s'1 So Jli· ~.....---~.... ~"-~~,--~.=". ~::; ~~~ _____ ·.u .. ,. ~"~ 1 .. ~r;;EI\lE'"' I
f j, ~ YlCINIJY MoW1N 2 "U t't;"~1.".': ",W N.T.S. . 92014
I ~~~~~ -.... ;'YOFr,i:N
LANN/iw,; ,,-TON
RECORDER"S CERTIFICATE .......... , .•. , ..•. , LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE TALBOT ROAD SK'(:)TH
THIS SH~T PU.T COFi:RECllY REPRESENTS A SUR~ :JV'
FILED FOR RECORD lliiS ....... DAY ~ ............ 20....... t.I~~~ :.:~Et.I~~I~~PER;SI,: IN ~ T ee Surve rs SHORT PLAT
AT ....... 1.4 IN BOOK .......••• OF •••••••• AT PAGE ......... AT APPROPRIAl[ STAl[ AND COUNTY STA1UTE AND on. ~ ~
THE REQUEST Of" ................................... ORDfNNIIOE IN ................ 20........ 10007 ~ A~ ~ .... ~=525-J6IIO D'Ml BV DATE JOB NO.
SURVEYOR'S NAWE NP 12-4-12 13196
............................................... CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET
...... ··t:4ANAGE"R" ....... ····SUPT:··Qi .. RECOADs .. ·· CERTIFICATE NO. ................ TG I" -40' 1 OF :5
RECORDING NO. VOL/PAGE
CITY OF RENTON
SHORT PLAT NO. ___ _
RENTON. WASHINGTON SCALE: 1 IIICR _ 40 ft.
<0 80 •
.c· "I ':':j' ~"\ ~.
-~.<o~
\.-; .. ,')lJ.
La.ooJii
R-~.OO
Rt:l .• '04" CONe.
YON. W/2" 8RASS DISC
W/f'UItCH til r.,t,S[
oont. 0.11
\'ISflID: 10-11-13
~
""i'~
I..EGEIIIl
51 FIllNI CONe WON AS 0E5CII!8[[I
CURVE TABLE
lOT UII£ SET1IN:I(S;
fl!ONT Y/IRD S£1'1W:K
R£AR YARn SET BIICl(
SIDE YAAD SET BACI(
WETl...'HD BUFT£R SEmACI(
". ,,' ,. ".
PAACEL NO. 3OlJCI5VD3, ..... <~
1 ~~~:=.~
Wfl"lJNCHIN~ """ ,. __ . _~ -=-'~-ll
S' VIIllE CONt. SlDEWAIJ(
PORTION OF
_HI._J/4 of ...:iL1/4. S . .....N_ T . ...2LN .. R . ...2...E .• W.M.
I I • • ~ I ....
LO" 5596 SF.~--
,.
~ fb'
LUA
LND 20-
~ ~
! ~ • • i ;
• w 1M.12'
J, ······----1
LOT 3
, 5591 S~. i
1'--IS" r.Y. SETB"'C~{~.}
: -:oj
~ 5 ~ r-' ---, i ' .
olI § I I : ....... LOT04-
?i: ,.. ~ I a 1..-;.... \\7308 S.F.
~.'" : lOT 1 ~I lilY i
,," jj
-*~
SHPL
,
~ ~ #cP~
".
PMCfL. NO. JIlZJo5!KlZZ
A~ ~ .. H£lilWG
2: CI, .. , t..' \ 1I::}1 'sm SP". ~ ":~ \ o _ z: I \ 1IQICHEl) \ ~5' 1II£iI..AHD BUFnR SfTBMX(nP.)
~ i L__ I \Y<;------\------~ .'.
~ -: .... ;..,' .
Q DETENTIONjWQ"; .'
RECREATION I :: : LOT 5 : Ts~ ~T ~ 'CI 6476 s.r. ~
.§:
~ 90IJNIlARY
...... .. ,,., -. ...
.l'W~ -, , I"~ iI .~-. ~ ""'" ~"""""---""'" . \ It....
V
21.620 Sf" SIREE1 (IW,F STI«:ET 1101PRO'oD1ENT) ~ . "" ,. ~'" ""'. ~ , .' J-.
'Z \
. "'''''''. 02L7I' -'f.",-~ , ... ;rf. .I::;:'~' _ I 7)' IIJ ""-"\ _ -= """"':~:::";-A"'o"""'-,
S(MSiTIVE AREA lJtACT 1224 S.f z m
W~II'1J"£ N4S";'Y47t:
21.21
~+~
\~.".=::t~EC
'II£1lAAI:I lU'FEII /l;TEI!POlA"JU\ JAN 2 9 2
CITY OF RENTO
PRofESSIONAL LAND ~VEYmS
IfIEll.AND 8OIJN{JARY Sl.JRIOEYEO
{)'MIl. BY
TALBOT ROAD SOUTH
SHORT PLAT
"IT JOe NO. ~ Tvee SuFUl~~ DIVISION
10007 GRfEN'M)()[I All[ N .. S£.\TlI..E WA 9B1Jo:1 (206):;2:1-36&0 I NP I 12-"-'2 I 1319G
CIiKD. BY SCALE SHEET
" ," --4(1. , '" ,
•
CITY OF RENTON
SHORT PLAT NO. ___ _
RENTON, WASHINGTON
i
;,
~ o
~
1
H ~
i
'I ~I~
"'I!
a
~
... _"0· '11-2&59.31 ~
N 81rJ&'2O" W-l865.71
1332.841
~
'=.~
H 8a'30'J6'---W=2~ 1011
~ ,,,,..,
N _2813" W-1822.78l!j
487.4!I
,~ " N 1W11'5i)" W-.2$&4.14
;1
1331.20
N 8V04'21)" '11-26&2.40
,"'-"
~
i ,
rl;
il~
21e., 1!Tl~
dm ~
1332-1)1 ::J ;
"
~
1331.20 u
PROfESSIONAL LAND §.JR\£yORS
RECORDING NO. VOL/PAGE
SCALE: t DICK -GOtI n. .' •• 'III •• c:=r:::=r:::=r:::=r:::=
"'" .. 00
PORTION OF
~'/4 of ~'/4, S.~ T.~., R.~ .• W.M.
LUA
LND 20-
-SHPL
SECTION BREAKDOWN
SEC. JO, T. 23 R, R. ~ E.., W..Ii.
5C\tE:;," _!!iOO'
·IKIIE~III![III(IIQWN
F1'IOIoI PLAT fK WIG'ER Dft'ISIJH I
sa SHEET 2 (F ~ FOR
lIE TO PLIIT WONS.
~ ~
::
TALBOT ROAD SOUTH
SHORT PLAT
OWN. BY • "E .... NO . ~ Tvee Surveyors
10007 GREENWDOO 'WE N_ SEATTlE. 'II'" tIIIol:IJ {2I»).5~.JMO "' 12-4-12 13196
CHKD. BY SCAI.£ "'EO ,. ,. -$00" , OF ,
,
a
!
!
I
! ·1
j~.
----------
gel
!'l~~ "~
! !
ql
~ ~~ •
~
I
l
.UII
h ,
~
j
I c
---1····--
TALBOT ROAD S. SHORT PLAT,
~
~~= _H_IIT
III!.t.TTL.I!.w ........ -,-
, f~-
CITY OF RENTON "_.
Civil Engineering and
Planning Consultants
, ',' ~", -.:
;>
1:5445 53RD AVF:fc. S,
SEATILE. WA 96181:1
~ r-
OJ
0
-I
lJ ~
0
~
~
-I
~
):>
-I
r,;==========================================================================================~ i
,
~ i ! , \ , \ ,
,
uO ;:u ,--I m > -< '-z » 0 z 0 :z Z
(;) To t>:> m 0:0 .." -_~ rY'1
'" < ~:z = -.... m ~O -"'"
z 0
ffi -u-sO :1\:) rn
-"."." \ . 1\ •
'" .~~ , ~. ~
! I ! ~ ~ ~
i I ~
.-----:::;---
------------
B ____ ::z---
;'
;'
~~
Pacific
Engineering
Design, LLC ,,0') """,",0
Civil Engineering and
Planning Consultants
~---------'\
*' 0
" !i -.
I • ,
~~
:/
I:
;, fi\A -u'_
~~ >.p.
'~'~ irl.
(h
0
7
~ -o~ I. !3 ,01 ,~ °0
: (JJ I :. im
'-» z
t-:>
<.g
,",-, =
-l;'~
----
TALBOT ROAD S. SHORT Engineering PHONE:
Design, LLC ~~!43H970
Civil Engineering and
Planning Consultants
(206) 388-1648
WEBSITE:
PACENG.COM
1l o
~ o z
o
" Z m
~
:0;;
o
" rJl m
'" '" z
?J
o
'" m
• • 9 ;; 0 • "
uO C;=i
2"< '--
;;;0 J:>
2 :z:
0) ." to.:> o;Q <c --n-~
;;;)z "" ~O = :;;::
;z
;; ;;
;:0 rn
0 rn -~
;; • • ;; ;;
TALBOT ROAD S. SHORT
~~~~EN~9. LLC
SEATT'lE.W .. g.alro
1't<00<1I''''') S83.-:!'
1
,i-"
~ ill,! ,
, --
---t~
~
L-,,-, -L----{
I ~~ II i' I: , ,. II
1
-I
1
1
'[
~, ,"
::]1 ____ c 1
------_~,----I
Civil Engineering and
Planning C;:.nsultants
( J-' ~
, -, " , "
----
------iALBOT RP sCCOu E:CTOR-STREE~~ --
-----==::::::----=------
'-
J> :z:
~
=
"-' =
;;0, m o m
< m o
TALBOT ROAD S. SHORT PLAT
CITY OF RENTON
~~i~~~-------~ ------
I
Civil Engineering and
Planning Consultants
~ I ~,-
~ ~
15445 63RDAVE. S
SEATTLE. WA981
1l
0
~
(5 z
0 -n
Z m ..
0 -n
(fJ
m
~ ..
0 -n
(fJ m r
'" p
:-I
N
'" z
?J
0
'" m
• • I I
! !
§m:lD II/I .:
l
f
i
I
!
!
!
• 1 • ~ ,
Conceptual
Landscape Plan
f !
I t
~ !
i
! ,
II
It
i
~ -
~ I i !q ~ • -, I
,
~ I ! ~ !
j
! 1 l ! ! < ! ~ I m "
• 0 II · , · , P i • i ;
I ; ; ; ; • >i ~ '" ~
I ! • i • • ?
If! f
· I ! Ii Li -I
• 0 ! h • ! 0 Pi M " ! !
; ; ; ; ;
~ ~ ; ~ • • if if
,
! • I
i
~
II' I ~ h-I ~
! !
,
!
i • !
f
l
0
%
am
P
f
z m
~ .. o
"T1
(fJ
m
~ ..
o
"T1
(fJ
m
~
is z
Talbot Rd. So. Short Plat
3340 Talbot Rd. So.
Renton, WA 98055
TO:City of Renton
ATTN: Vanessa Dolbee
Regarding: Land Use ~pplication # LUA14-000095
To whom it may conc"rn.
Maldiz Investments would like to request that you cancel the above short plat processing for the abOve
referenced application.
Please refund the maximum amount back to us to:
Maldiz Investments
1509 N 80" St
Seattle WA 98103
Sincerely,
David Albers, Maldi, Investments managing member
206-683-8821
Check Reque ... ~ .or Non Vendor Refund or ~, .. imbursement
This form is to be used only for one time vendors. Please contact Accounts Payable if you have
any questions regarding one time vendors.
Check will be included in the next scheduled AlP check rUII and mailed after COUllcil approval.
Check Request Info: Date of request:
April 9, 2014
Requestor's name: Requestor's department/division:
Vanessa Dolbee CEO -Planning
I Payable to:
Maldlz Investments, LLC
Mail address for check:
Attn: David Albers
Maldiz Investments, LLC
1509 N 80 th Street
Seattle, WA 98103
(206) 683-8821
Check amount: Account number(s) to charge:
$2,000.00 000.000000.011.345.81.00.000 Plan Modification
000.000000.007.345.81.01.000 Short Plat Fee
000.000000.007.345.81.04.000 Environmental Review
Reasonfor refund or reimbursement:
Permit: LUA 14-000095
Project: Talbot Rd South Short Plat
Reason: Customer withdrew application. Return 80% of fees.
Check handling request:
Mail copy of check request with check to customer.
*A nature:
Requestor's Department Administrator,
DivisiJn pir::Cfor or designee:
Signature: _~~~~~_1bf(~~---.: 11~· __ I-______ ---.j
Jennifer Henning
type name of signer on ahove line
Date: April 9, 2014
*The person approving this check request must be an authorized signer.
C:IUserslhpower5\DesktoplJnvoices\Rcfllnd Form_doc 0"1;11,, Typelfble Form, Jlfly 2007
Requestor's ext. #:
7314
Amount per account #:
80.00
1,120.00
800.00
RECEIPT EG00021702
--,---"---,---------,----,----,
BILLING CONTACT
David Albers & Zazhary Lazo
Maldiz Investments LLC
1509 N 80TH ST
SEATTLE, WA 981034422
REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME
LUA 14-000095 PLAN· Environmental Review
PLAN -Modification
PLAN -Short Plat Fee
----~,----
nlnreo Un: 419/2014 Prepared By: Holly Powers
TRANSACTION
TYPE
Refund
Refund
Refund
Transaction Date: April 09,2014
PAYMENT
METHOD
Refund Finance AP
Refund Finance AP
~efund Finance AP
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
AMOUNT PAID
($800,00)
($80,00)
($1,120,00)
($2,000,00)
($2,000,00)
Page 1 of 1
Denis Law c· t _~May:m .-."",.",.., .... ~J~'D ?@11!JC\
February 6, 2014
Department of Community and Economic Development
C.E"Ch i p"Vincent, Ad min istrator
Greg Deiner
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
15445 53 rd Avenue South, SUite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Subject: Notice of Incomplete Application
Talbot Road South Short Plat, LUA14-000095
Dear Mr. Deiner:
The Planning DiVIsion of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application
is iricomplete according to submittal requirements and, the following items will need to
be submitted by May 7, 2014, in order to continue processing your application:
• Revised Site Plan. The submitted site plan indicates that access to the 5
proposed residential lots would be via a shared driveway from the proposed
private half street. Code allows a maximum of4 lots to be accessed by a shared
driveway. Up to 3 of the lots may use the driveway as primary access for
emergencies. The remainder of the lots must have physical frontage along a
street for primary arid emergency access and shall only be allowed vehicular
access from the shared. driveway. Alternatively, private streets are allowed for
access to six or fewer lots, provided at least 2 of the 6 lots abut a public right-of-
way.
The submitted site also shows a "Sensitive Area Tract". However, this tract is
shown with a dashed line and, therefore, it is not clear whether it is, in fact, a
separate tract. The site plan should clearly delineate the tract as a Native
Growth Protection AreaTract .
. The submitted site plan must indicate both gross and net area for each proposed
residehtiallot.
Please submit a revised site plan which conforms to Code requirements.
• Revised Landscape Plan. The submitted landscape plan does not indicate the
required 10-foot landscape strip along street frontages for the residential lots.
Renton City Hall. 1055 South GradyWay • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
. . • Page 2 of 2
Greg Deiner
Talbot Road SHPL
Landscaping for the "landscape area" east of the proposed public half street
does not show the type of landscaping proposed.
Please submit a revised landscape plan which conforms to Code requirements.
• Other Plan Sheets. All plan sheets must be revised to conform to the revised site
plan.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7382 if you have any questions ..
, ... ~~
,/ Gerald C. Wasser .
Associate Planner
cc: ~aldiz Investments, LLC / Owner(s)
Jilnuary 25, 2014
City of Renton
Staff Development Service Division
Project # 13053 "New Development"
Concerns:
Pest Control. The house on the property has been open for at least a year. Doors open to squatters, vandals, leaving
behind debris and busted out walls with insulation hanging out. I took pictures and showed them to the COmpliance
Dept. They said they would take care of it approximately two months ago. The yard was somewhat cleaned up; the
doors remained open which would lead to the perfect home for very large rat's nests. Rats would be going in every
direction imaginable when they tearthe house down. Please have the developers be required to have a pest control
company go in and contain the rodents to the building and at their expense drop some traps around the neighboring
properties.
Are you aware of this? From the SW corner of 631 S. 32'" St. to the NE corner of 901 S. 32'" St., there is a storm water
drainage ditch between the "new development" and the properties on S. 32'" Street with a storm water drain at the SW
corner of 631 S. 32'" St.
Cedar Trees. There are cedar trees planted in the storm water ditch to act as a screen between the "new development·
and 703 S. 32'" St. These 13 trees are right on the property line. Would it be possible to save these trees and maintain
them for privacy between the neighboring properties and the "new development."
Storm Water and Underground Springs. The lot behind the back yard of 703 S. 32'" St. The previous owner of the "new
development" had a duck pond with run-off water from the drainage ditch and underground springs that come up in the
winter when it rains. The last owner was going to park his company trucks on the lot and had to call in a tow truck to
haul them out because it was just too soggy. Recently, the survey crew rode a truck onto the lot and they had to dig it
out. The last 20 years even in the summer it has been somewhat of a quagmire.
Urban density. In the period of time that I have lived in this neighborhood, the housing has at least tripled with less and
less space being kept for the natural wildlife of the area: deer, raccoons, possum, coyote, squirrels. Even with the so
called Wetlands areas that are left, as all these new developments are plotted out, there is increased traffic into already
grid locked streets. Look at 43'" and 180'" St. corridor from top to the bottom, Benson to Oakdale, at morning and
evening crawl hours to truly understand how huge a problem this is and with more developments sure to follow, there is
no way that it is going to get better anytime soon. With 6 houses to start and 2.5 vehicles per house, that's another 15
odd trucks, cars, motorcycles and motor homes on an already crowded street and what will be their access streets to
180"', Talbot and the Benson road. We are already besieged by speeding by FedEx and UPS trucks, school busses (yes
they do speed) and people cutting through the neighborhood going to Talbot in the morning and back to Benson in the
evening.
Thank you for all you can do about these concerns.
Sincerely,
(J
Carl Kiminki
703 S. 32"d St.
Renton, WA 98055
(425-277-5707)
em' OF RENTON
RECEIVED
JAN 2'l 2014
BUILDING DIVISION
\~ "\ J 3. ~ "'-"1.
Q,) I It .r.! '-'-~~
1-\..... ~ 0.. ~.,,5
.... --
~
In I \:: ~ C0
~ ~\i <)t
'\>
" .J
\ .....
--S ~ 'v
~ V> t 3\=.::~
ow -r-~'t
I \-~ oS ~ \1)...,-\ ~:) ~ '"? \ 'li. \_~ ] ~ S '0
~
I:>
-l.
.,
Il.
" ~
0 t \"
~
~
-.J...,
-..1
~ '--"-'
~ ~ ..r---
';.; ~ ~
-\--~
1 ~
...s " v
c ~ -"" ~
G \
~
CITY OF RENTOMa~
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 15, 2015
To: City Clerk's Office
From: Sabrina Mirante
Subject: Land Use File Closeout
Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City
Clerk's Office
Project Name: Talbot Road S. Short Plat
LUA (file) Number: LUA-14-000095, ECF, SHPL-A
Cross-References:
AKA's:
Project Manager: Gerald Wasser
Acceptance Date: \ ho\l"!,., ~I.
Applicant: Greg Deiner
Owner: Maldiz Investments
Contact: David Albers
PID Number: 3023059071
ERC Determination: Date:
Appeal Period Ends:
Administrative Decision: Date:
Appeal Period Ends:
Public Hearing Date:
Date Appealed to HEX:
By Whom:
HEX Decision: Date:
Appeal Period Ends:
Date Appealed to Council:
By Whom:
Council Decision: Date:
Mylar Recording Number:
Project Description: 5-lot short plat with storm drainage tract. Wetlands abutting the property
as indicated in the project's wetland study contained in this file. Project was later withdrawn by
applicant prior to acceptance as complete or routing.
Location: 3340 Talbot Rd S
Comments: WITHDRAWN SEPTEMBER 17, 2014
ERC Determination Types; DNS -Determination of Non-Significance; DNS-M -Determination of
Non-Significance-Mitigated; OS -Determination of Significance.
Denis Law
Mayor
September 17,2014
Greg Deiner
Pacific Engineering Design, LlC
15445 53'd Avenue South, Suite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Department of Community and Economic Development
C.E. "Chi p"Vincent, Ad mi n istrator
Subject: Notice of Project Application Withdrawl and File Closeout
Talbot Road South 5-lot Short Plat, lUA14-000095
Parcel Number 302305-9071
Dear Mr. Deiner:
The Planning Division of the City of Renton has received a request (attached) from the contact
person for this project to withdraw the application.
This will serve as final notice that this file has been closed out and any future development
proposalwill require a new application and file number and additional public notice.
Please contact me at (425) 430-7312 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
t2o/~lJ~
Angelea Wickstrom
Assistant Planner
cc: Maldiz Investments, LLC / Owner(s}
Parties of Record: Sharon Vrablick
Andy and Ru Brockenbough
Carl Kiminki
Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov
TO;City of Renton
ATTN: Vanessa Dolbee
Regarding: land Use application # LUA14-000095
To whom it may concern,
Maldiz Investments would like to request that you cancel the above short plat processing for the above
referenced application.
Please refund the maximum amount back to us to:
Maldiz Investments
1509 N 8O'h St
Seattle WA 98103
Sincerely,
David Albers, Maldiz Investments managing member
206-683-8821
Check Requestfor Non Vendor Refund or Reimbursement
This form is to be used only for one time vendors. Please contact Accounts Payable if you have
any questions regarding one time vendors.
Check will be included in the next scheduled AlP check run and mailed after Council approval •
.
Check Request Info: Date of request:
April 9, 2014
Requestor's name:
Vanessa Dolbee
Requestor's department/division:
. CEO -Planning
I Payable to:
Maldlz Investments, LLC
Mail address for check:
Attn: David Albers
Maldiz Investments, LLC
1509 N 80th Street
Seattle, WA 98103
(206) 683-8821
Check amount: Account number(s) to charge:
$2,000.00 000,000000.011.345.81.00,000 Plan Modification
000.000000.007,345.81.01,000 Short Plat Fee
000.000000,007.345.81.04.000 Environmental Review
Reason for refund or reimbursement:
Permit: LUA 14-000095
Project: Talbot Rd South Short Plat
Reason: Customer withdrew application. Return 80% of fees.
Check handling request:
Mail copy of check request with check to customer.
*A nature:
Signature: _~~~~~--':'~:..'..-.~"":"'-=----I-______ --.j
Jennifer Henning
type name of signer on above line
Date: A ril9, 2014
*The person approving this check request must be an authorized signer.
C:\Users\hpowers\Desbop\!nvoices\Rcfund Form.doc: Onlillt: T}pcublll Form,./Itly 2007
Requestor's ext. #:
7314
Amount per account #:
80,00
1,120,00
800,00
RECEIPT EG00021702
BILLING CONTACT
David Albers & Zazhary Lazo
Maldiz Investments LLC
1509 N 80TH ST
SEATTLE, WA 981034422
REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME
LUA 14-000095 PLAN· Environmental Review
PLAN -Modification
PLAN -Short Plat Fee
REMAINING B CES as of 06105/2014
MODULE ASENUMBER F
Plan LUA -000095
Printed On: 61512014 Prepared Bv: Holly Powers
TRANSACTION
TYPE
Refund
Refund
Refund
Transaction Date: April 09, 2014
PAYMENT
METHOD
Refund Finance AP
Refund Finance AP
Refund Finance AP
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
AMOUNT PAID
($800.00)
($80.00)
($1,120.00)
($2,000.00)
($2,000.00)
MAINING BALANCE
$800.00
$80.00
$1,120.00
2,000.00
TOTAL REMAINING $2,000.00
Page 1 of 1
City of Renton
LAND USE PERMIT
MASTER APPLICATION
PROPERTY OWNER(S)
NAME: Maldiz Investments, LLC.
ADDRESS: 1509 North 80·h Street
CITY: Seattle zIP:WA 98103
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 683-8821
APPLICANT (if other than owner)
NAME: btOj A \J\~'f\h
COMPANY (if applicable): '(;\l'.\\l t:f~ 1\~52.'·\(\'1,
. \w .c'". '" '" \ c.-~
ADDRESS \~ '-\'\1) 5~\ 0" M '. ~ S-\ ~ \QQ
.
CITY: 1 v'{W\\C\ ~. ZIP: q~\,&~
TELEPHONE NUMBER C'lO~~) l\;\-1\1\1\0
CONTACT PERSON
NAME: David Albers, Zachary Lazo
COMPANY (if applicable): Maldiz Investments, LLC.
ADDRESS: 1509 North 80·h Street
CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98103
TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS:
(206) 683-8821 DavidA@CaliberRE.com
Q:webJpw/devserv/tormsJplanninglmasterapp.doc
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
Talbot Road South Short Plat
PROJECTIADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE:
3340 Talbot Road South, Renton, WA 98055
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
302305-9071
EXISTING LAND USE(S): Single Family Residence
PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single Family Residence
EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
RSF
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION
(if applicable): RSF
EXISTING ZONING: R-8
PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): R-8
SITE AREA (in square feet): 59,586
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED
FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING
THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): 27,373 ±
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET
ACRE (if applicable): 7
NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if ap~EeE IV E D
NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if <IIl>~lIIa~E9: 1!ll14
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING 61tW§N
-' )JECT INFORMATION (con .=.ue::..:d~I) _______ --,
NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 1
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable):
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 0
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A
NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if
applicable): N/A
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE
NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A
PROJECT VALUE:
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF
ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE
SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable):
o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE
o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO
o FLOOD HAZARD AREA
o GEOLOGIC HAZARD
o HABITAT CONSERVATION
o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES
Il<I WETLANDS
___ sq. ft.
___ sq. ft.
___ sq. ft.
___ sq. ft.
1,200 sq. ft.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
(Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included)
SITUATE IN THE SE QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23N, RANGE 5E, IN THE CITY OF RENTON,
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES
List all land use applications being applied for:
1. Short Plat 3. Right of way use
2. Grading and drainage 4.
Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
I, (Print Name/s) ~,~ ~ , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property
involved in this application or ~"t\ttll; authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing
s.tatements and answers herein c tained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
(Signature of Owner/Representative)
Q:web/pw/devservifonns/planninglmasterapp.doc
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ---,;~\WZ:.,-;-,,=--,----;--,---_:-;--:-:
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print) \t\ ().'(\'" 'If, c. -\c<\ 0.
My appointment'expires:_L\....I.-'\'.;\.'-"-".!.\""~----'-____ _
II/DIIlJ
.... PLANNING DIVISION
WAIVl OF SUBMITTAL REQUI. V1ENTS
FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS
This requirement may be waived by:
1. Property Services
2. Public Works Plan Review
f". f" _____
RE~~ME:~~¥~~~~
3. Building
4. Planning
JA N 2 9 2014 DATE: -=-+-=--;{-I<~'-'--""'-__ _
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
H;\CED\Data\Forms·Templates\Self~Help Handouls\Planning\waiverofsubmlttalreqs.xls
PLANNING DIVISION
WAIVf-.... F SUBMITTAL REQUIr-.. ENTS
Fur{ LAND USE APPLICATlul'JS
of Sites 2 3
Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND 3
Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3
Map of View Area 2 AND 3
2AN03
This requirement may be waived by: l3-ooo03'4
1. Property Services PROJECT NAME: L
2. Public Works Plan Review
3. Building
4. Planning
DATE: ..!::::+-"''''''-;f---=-''-''.:=--.!c..::3===--___ _
H:\CEO\Data\Forms-TemplateS\Selr-Halp Handouls\Planning\walverofsubmittalreqs.xls 06109
PREAPPLICATION MEETING FOR
Morell Short Plat
3340 Talbot Road South
PRE 13-000639
CITY OF RENTON
Department of Community & Economic Development
Planning Division
June 6, 2013
Contact Information:
Planner: Gerald Wasser, 425.430.7382
Public Works Plan Reviewer: Rohini Nair, 425.430.7298
Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas, 425.430.7024
Building Department Reviewer: Craig Burnell, 425.430.7290
RECEIVED
JAN 292014
CITY OF RE
PLANNING NTON
DIVISION
Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider
giving copies of it to any engineers, architects, and contractors who work on the
project. You will need to submit a copy of this packet when you apply for land use
and/or environmental permits.
Pre-screening: When you have the project application ready for submittal, call and
schedule an appointment with the project manager to have it pre-screened before
making all of the required copies.
The pre-application meeting is informal and non-binding. The comments provided on
the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The
applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the
proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project
submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or
concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Planning Director,
Development Services Director, Department of Community & Economic Development
Administrator, Public Works Administrator and City Council).
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
June 6, 2013
Pre-application File No. 13-000639
Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner
Morell Short Plat
General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-
referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and
permitting Issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of
Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is
cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification
and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Community &
Economic Development Administrator, Public Works Administrator, Planning Director,
Development Services Director, and City Council). Review comments may also need to
be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or
made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of
the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase
for $100.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or online at
www.rentonwa.gov
Project Proposal: The subject property is located at 3340 Talbot Road South (APN
3023059071) on the east side ofTalbot Road South. The project site is 58,371 square
feet in area (1.34 acres) and Is zoned Residential-8 dwelling units per acre (R-8). The
proposal is to subdivide the property into 6 residential lots and one tract for a storm
drainage pond. The applicant indicates that the proposed residential lots range in size
from 4,657 to 17,510 square feet. Tract "A" would be 4,515 square feet. An existing
single-family residence is proposed to be relocated to one of the proposed residential
lots. Access to the proposed subdivision appears to be via two approximately is-foot
pipestems with an overlying access easement.
Current Use: An existing house which appears to be located primarily on Proposed Lot 5
is proposed to be relocated to one of the proposed residential lots.
Zoning/Density Requirements: The subject property is zoned Residential-8 dwelling
units per acre (R-8). The minimum density in the R-8 zone is 4.0 dwelling units per net
acre (dulac) and the maximum density is 8.0du/ac.
h:\ced\plannlng\current planning\preapps\13-000639.jerry\pre013-000639, morel16-lot short plat, r-B.doc
Madfal 2-Lot Short Plat, PRE13-0003B3
Page 2 of 5
May 16,2013
Note: Private access easements, critical areas (wetlands, streams, slopes in excess of
40%), and public right-of-way dedications are deducted from the total area to
determine net density. Proposed access to the proposed subdivision Is not dearly
indicated on the submitted site plan; there are dashed and solid lines which seem to
indicate pipestem lots and/or access easements, or private street, but these are not
clearly defined. Net density would be verified at the time of formal short plat
submittal. Zoning requirements may necessitate a wider access than Indicated on the
submitted site plan which would increase the net density.
A Density Worksheet would be required with a formal short plat application submittal.
Development Standards: The project would be subject to RMC 4-2-110A, "Development
Standards for Single Family Zoning Designations" effective at the time of complete
application.
Minimum Lot Size, Width and Depth -The minimum lot size permitted in Zone R-8 is
4,500 square feet for parcels greater than one acre. Minimum lot width Is 50 feet for
interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots; minimum lot depth is 65 feet. Note: Depending
on clarified lot configuration (see note in Zoning/Density Requirements section, above)
Proposed Lat 6 may be a corner lot.
Building Standards -The R-8 zone alJows a maximum building coverage of 35% of the lot
area or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size.
The maximum impervious coverage In the R-8 zone is 75%. Building height is restricted
to 30 feet. Detached accessory structures must remain below a height of 15 feet and
one-story. Accessory structures are also included in building lot coverage calculations.
Note: Compliance with the maximum building coverage and maximum impervious
coverage requirements for the lots would be verified at the time of building permit
review.
Setbacks -Setbacks are the minimum required distance between the building footprint
and the property line. The required setbacks in Zone R-8 are:
Front yard -15 feet for the primary structure.
Rear yard -20 feet.
Side yards -S-feet, except 1S-feet for side yards along a street or access easement.
Note: Setbacks would be verified at the time of building permit review.
Residential Design and Open Space Standards: The Residential Design and Open Space
Standards contained in RMC 4-2-115 would be applicable to any new residential
structures. A handout indicating the applicable guidelines and standards is enclosed.
Access/Parking: Access to each as indicated in the note in the Zoning/Density
Requirements section, above, is not clearly indicated. Two off street parking spaces are
required for each lot. Note: As per RMC 4-6-170, pipestem lots shalf not exceed 150
feet in length and shall not be less than 20 feet wide. The portion of the lot narrower
than 80 percent of the minimum permitted width shall not be used for lot area
h:\ced\plannlng\current planning\preapps\13-000639.jerry\pre013-000639, morell6-lot short plat, r-
B.doc
Madfai Hot Short Plat, PRE13-000383
Page 3 of S
May 16, 2013
calculations nor for measurement of required front yard setbacks. Land area included
in private access easements shall not be Included in lot area calculations for pipestem
lots. Furthermore, RMC 4-6-060H.2 and 4 require that dead end streets from 300 to
500 feet In length shall be required to provide a cul-de-sac. RMC 4-6-060H.5 requires
secondary access for emergency equipment when a development of 3 or more
buildings is located more than 200 feet from a public street. None of these
requirements appears to be met on the submitted site plan.
Private streets are allowed for access to six or fewer lots, provided that 2 of the 6 lots
abut a public right-of-way (RMC 4-6-060J.1. If access is determined to be via a private
street all other requirements of RMC 4-6-060J shall be required.
A shared driveway may be permitted for access up to a maximum of 4 lots. Up to 3 of
the lots may use the driveway as primary access for emergencies. The remainder of
the lots must have physical frontage along a street for primary and emergency access
and shall only be allowed vehicular access from the shared private driveway. As shown
an the submitted site plan, the requirements for a shared private driveway have not -
been satisfied. Furthermore, driveway slopes may nat exceed a 15 percent slope.
Portions of the current driveway exceed this threshold slope.
Depending on the outcome of the required critical areas studies (see Critical Areas
section of this report), staff may support a public street with half street Improvements
(RMC 4-6-060Q.2). Such half street dedication and Improvements may require
standards modifications.
Staff recommends that the applicant redesign the project to be in conformance with
RMC 4-6, Street Regulations.
landscaping: Except for critical areas, all portions of a development area not covered
by structures, required parking, access, circulation or service areas, must be landscaped
with native, drought-resistant, vegetative cover. Development standards require that all
pervious areas within the property boundaries be landscaped. The minimum on-site
landscape width required along street frontages is 10 feet. In addition, if there is no
landscape strip within the right-of-way, then two ornamental trees are required in the
front yard setback area of each lot. These trees would need to be planted prior to the
final inspection of the building permit.
Please refer to landscape regulations (RMC 4-4-070) for further general and specific
landscape requirements. A conceptual landscape plan would be required at the time of
formal Short plat application.
Significant Tree Retention: If significant trees (greater than 6-inch caliper) are proposed
to be removed, a tree inventory and a tree retention plan along with a tree retention
worksheet shall be prOVided with the formal land use application. The tree retention
plan must show preservation of at least 30 percent of significant trees, and indicate how
proposed building footprints would be sited to accommodate preservation of significant
h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapp,\13-000639.jerry\pre013-000639, morel! 6-lot short plat, r-
8_doc
Madfa; 2-Lot Short Plat, PRf: 0383
Page 4 of 5
May 16, 2013
trees that would be retained, If staff determines that the trees cannot be retained, they
may be replaced with minimum 2 inch caliper trees at a ratio of six to one.
Critical Areas: The subject site contains unclassified coal mine hazard, steep slopes,
and potential wetland areas. A geotechnical engineering report/study would be
required with a formal application including a coal mine analysis and
recommendations, as well as a steep slope onalysis. Because wetlands are prevalent
in the vicinity of the proposed project, the applicant must provide a wetland
reconnaissance report, prepared by a wetland biologist. If wetlands and/or buffer
areas are found to exist on the project site a wetland report would be required. Such
reconnaissance report must include analysis of properties within 100 feet of the
subject site's boundaries.
Environmental Review: Short plats are exempt from Environmental (SEPAl Review
unless critical areas and their buffers are found to exist on the subject property, Note:
Depending on findings contained in the required geotechnical and wetland
reconnaissance reports, Environmental (SEPA) Review may be required (see Critical
Areas section, above). The fee for Environmental (SEPA) Review is $1,030.00
($1,000.00 plus 3 percent Technology Surcharge Fee).
Permit Requirements: Short Plat requests are reviewed within an estimated time frame
of 6 to 8 weeks, from the time that the application is accepted as complete. The fee for
a short plat application is $1,442.00 ($1,400,00 plus 3% Technology Surcharge Fee).
Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction fees, impact fees are
required. Such fees apply to all projects and would be calculated at the time of building
permit application and payable prior to building permit issuance. The fees for 2013 are
as follows:
• Transportation Impact Fee -$717.75 per new single-family house;
• Park Impact Fee -$530.76 per new single-family house; and
• Fire Impact Fee -$479,28 per new single-family house.
A Renton School District Impact Fee, which is currently $6,392,00 per new horne, would
be payable prior to building permit issuance.
A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is attached for your review,
Note: When formal application materials are complete, the applicant must make an
appointment with the project manager, Gerald Wasser, to have one copy of the
application materials pre-screened at the 6th public counter prior to submitting the
complete application package, Mr. Wasser may be contacted at (425) 430-7382 or
gwasser@rentonwa.gov.
Expiration: Upon approval, short plats are valid for two years with a possible one year
extension.
h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000639.jerry\pre013-000639, morel16-lot short pial, r·
8,dac
Madlai 2-lot Short Plat, PRE 10383
Page 5 of 5
May 16,2013
h:\ced\planning\current planning\preapps\13-000639.jerry\pre013·000639, morell6·lot short plat, r·
g.doc
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M 0 R A N D U M
DATE: June 3, 2013
TO: Gerald Wasser, Planner
FROM: Rohini Nair, Plan Review
SUBJECT: Morell Short Plat
3340 Talbot Road South
PRE13-000639
NOTE: The applicant is cautioned that information contained In this summary is preliminary and non-
binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review
comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by
City staff or made by the applicant.
I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal. The following comments are
based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant.
WATER
1. The proposed development is within the City's water service area in the Talbot Hill 350-
hydraulic pressure-zone. There is an existing 12-inch water main in Talbot Rd S (refer to City
water project plan no. W-0599) that can deliver a flow rate of 5,000 gpm. The static water
pressure is about 78 psi at ground elevation of 164 feet. There is an existing 3/4-lnch domestic
water meter serving the existing house at 3340 Talbot Rd S. (refer to utility billing account no.
680710).
2. The following water main improvements will be required, a preliminary conceptual layout of the
proposed water main improvements is shown as attached:
a. Extension of about 640 feet of 8-inch water main in the private access road along the
south property line, from the existing 12-inch water main in Talbot Road 5 to the
easterly property line. A is-foot wide utility easement for the new water main is
required. The applicant can request a developer-held latecomer agreement for the
portion of the new 8-inch water main from Talbot Road 5 to the west property line of
the short plat.
b. Extension of a 4-inch water main in the north-south interior access road from the above
8-inch water main to the north end of the access road.
3. Installation of a fire hydrant within 300 feet of each lot.
4. Installation of i-inch domestic waler service line to each lot connecting to the above 4-inch
water main.
Morell Short Plat-PRE13-000639
Page 2 of 3
June 3, 2013
5. The applicant shall verify with Renton Fire Prevention department to determine if a residential
fire sprinkler system is required for each lot due to the long dead-end private access road.
6. The development is subject to the water system development charge (SOC) fee of $2,523.00 and
a water meter installation fee of $2,870.00 for each I-inch meter, These fees, as well as any
related permit fees, are collected at the time a construction permit is issued. The meters will be
installed by the City. A redevelopment credit may be applicable for any existing water meter to
the existing house,
7. The development is subject to assessment related to the special assessment district no. 8405
(Valley General Hospital SAD) based on front footage and area charge.
8. Civil plans for the water main improvements will be required and must be prepared by a
registered professional engineer In the State of Washington.
SANITARV SEWER
1. Sewer service is provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District Waste water service area.
Sewer availability certificate is to be provided to the city with land use and construction permits,
SURFACE WATER
1. A drainage report complying with the City adopted 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and
City Amendments will be required. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within
the Flow Control Duration Standard (Forested Conditions). Refer to Figure 1.1.2.A -Flow chart
for determining the type of drainage review required in the City of Renton 2009 Surface Water
Design Manual Amendment.
2. A geotechnical report forthe site is required. Information on the water table and soil
permeability, with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical
designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer, shall be submitted with the application.
3. Surface water system development fee is $1,120.00 for each lot.
TRANSPORTATION
1. Payment of the transportation impact fee is applicable on the construction of the single family
houses at the time of building permit application. The current transportation impact fee rate is
$717.75 per single family house. The impact fee for this type of land use will increase on
January 1, 2014, to $1,430.72 per single family house. Credit may be applicable for the existing
house that will be demolished. The transportation impact fee that is current at the time of
building permit application will be levied, payable at issuance of building permit.
2. Depending on the outcome of the critical area studies, a half street improved public street
(preferred), or a private street may be the access options to the lots (refer to RMC 4-6-060 for
information regarding both the half street improvements and private roads). If the critical area
studies allow a half street improved public street, then a request for the review of street
modifications may be submitted. A dead end street longer than 150 feet in length is required to
provide a turnaround or cul-de-sac. A cul-de-sac must be proVided for dead end streets longer
than 300 feet, and must meet with Fire Department approval. Frontage improvements are not
required on the pipestem frontage on Talbot Road.
H :\CEO\Pla n ning\Current Pia nning\PREAPPS\13-000639.Je rry\Plan Review Comments PRE 13-000639 .doc
Morell Short Plal-PRE13-000639
Page 3 of 3
June 3, 2013
3_ The RMC 4.7.170 F.1 states that the pipestem shall not exceed one hundred fifty feet (150') in
length and not be less than twenty feet (20') in width. If two adjacent pipestem driveways are
proposed, then the individual pipestem widths shall not be less than 20'. A request may be
submitted to review the modification/variance of the maximum length of the pipestem.
4. The maximum grade for the private street shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%).
General Comments
1. All construction or service utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require
separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans
shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer.
2. When utility plans are complete, please submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies
of the drainage report, permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and
application fee at the counter on the sixth floor.
11:\ CED\Pla nn ing\Curre nt Pia nni np,\PREAPPS\13-000639.J erry\Pla n Review Co mme nl5 PR E 13-000639 .doc
=ire & Emergency Serv
)epartment
:s
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
5/28/2013 12:00:00AM
Gerald Wasser, Associate Planner
Corey Thomas, Plan Review/Inspector
SUBJECT: (Morell Short Plat Preapplication, Morrell Short Plat Preapplication) PRE13-000639
1. The fire flow requirement for a single family home is 1,000 gpm minimum for dwellings up to 3,600 square
feet (including garage and basements). if the dwelling exceeds 3,600 square feet, a minimum of 1,500 gpm
fire flow would be required. A minimum of one fire hydrant is required within 300-feet ofthe proposed
buildings and two hydrants if the fire flow goes up to 1,500 gpm. There are no existing hydrants within 300
-feet at this time. A water main extension will be required.
2. The fire impact fees are applicable at the rate of $479.28 per single family unit. This fee is paid at building
permit issuance. Credit will be granted for the relocation of the one existing home.
3. Fire department apparatus access roadways are required to be a minimum of 20-feet wide fully paved, with
25-feet inside and 45-feet outside turning radius. Fire access roadways shall be constructed to support a 30
-ton vehicle with 322-psi point loading. Access is required within lSD-feet of all points on the buildings. An
approved turnaround is required for all dead end streets exceeding lSD-feet in length. Maximum grade is 15%.
A full 90-foot diameter cul-de-sac is required per code for all roads over 300-feet dead end. Per city ordinance,
all homes on dead end streets that exceed 5DO-feet, require all homes to be equipped with an approved fire
sprinkler system, in this case all of the homes.
Page 1 of 1
PRE13-000639 Morell Short Plat
o
'1: 9,690 --S()S o 404 808 FEW\
City of-R:entOn ~
Finance & IT Division
Legend
D
L
Jurisdiction Boundaries
l-J Olh,,1
[1 ():y of Rell~On
Parcels
Overlay Districts
[J A~lo '~all A
n A'Jlo f.lall H o [mploj'm['[): Area Va::""y
:.J City Canter 5i;'I\ Re;;u:atloll Area
f/l unnn Dosign District A
Information Technology -GIS
RenlonMapSuppor1@Rcntonwa_gov
I 5/2312013
n
Environment Designations
8J Natural
II 511010311(10 Hgh Intensity o Shorelile "o:aleo High Intensity
00 Sho:eline ,'\esiclenIJal o Urb:lII COn>CN3rl(:Y
Ju risdictions
Streams (CIHssifled)
,
Thi~ ma)~ is a user generated slaUc OJ\pl.i1 jrom an Internet m3ppins sile urld 1
is fDr releren::.e only_ D~la layers i,hnl ap!)83r on \.hIS map rn3Y Of mal' not be i
acu;rille. curren~ or (:\her\,,',se n:lliiD,e. I
THIS MAP IS IIJOT TO BE U~~D FOR NAVI~ATI~
i L-. __ _
. ,., -",.
It
81'1'3111011(
J
/'H .-
1M
_._CA
" 'I
.....
ZONING MAP BOOK
PW TECHNICAL SERVICES
PRINTED ON 11/13/09
u;"_ ... ",~.,."",,,I""""'\Ioo\""
r .. " .... dko'......,._,."IIoIoH' ...
11". kJ1_~"" .... ·'~"' .. IIu.. ~""''''';ri. ,.,.,""~~W..f.4"" "" .. '~I,...,;.. .. ""I
,
{
, f
--'~-L,.J'~
R-l
co
"
I
,' ~-j l ~~~ill.l-C'~'" 4
R-8 n
co
", '>.:' '-"
I3 -31 T23N R5E E 112 ~" ;..w'. H3
U ~_~_~IF.et 30 T23N RSE E 112
1:4,800
5130
· .
Morrell Property • Site Map
,
Paci'ic EngiJrllE3N:::U"JJ"JY
~J-Design:l!LL G
CIvIl ..... iI __ ,.I.n.g ~
". ........... 0 COl7suJ:k.urJ'.Es
15445 53 rd Avenue South, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431-7970 Fax: (206) 388-1648
Date: 12/02/2013
Talbot Road South Short Plat Project Narrative
Project over view
The site address is 3340 Talbot Road South, Renton, W A 98055. Land use permits
required for the proposed project include Short Plat permit and Clearing and grading
permit. Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties is R-8. Current use of the
site is single family residential. Existing improvements include a single family house and
related structures. There is an offsite Category 3 wetland near the east property line of
the site. The 25 feet wetland buffer will encroach into the east portion of the site.
Onsite soil is Alderwood gravelly sandy loam mostly (6% to 15% AgC) and with (J 5% to
18%, AgO) in the lower portion of the access road.
The lot count is a function of two items -drainage and fire turnaround.
By code there is a requirement to have a cul-de-sac at the end of a road exceeding 300
feet in length.
Drainage comes into the equation because the City of Renton normally requires that the
detention facility be provided in a separate tract. The tract designated as detention may
encroach on one's ability to gain an additional lot. If one of the detention facilities is
located in a detention tract a second facility must be located under the street near the
intersection with Talbot. Thus a variance to City standards would be required for one or
both detention facilities.
This also means that the "street" would likely need to be a public street. The site is
accessed from Talbot Road South. A half street improvement with a half cul-de-sac is
proposed. Because the width of the pan handle shape access right of way is only 30'
wide, modification to the 35' minimum width of half street improvement is required.
With all of these restrictions and the requirements ofthe zoning code for R-8 zone, 5
single family lots can be divided in the 1.37 acres subject property. Proposed lot density
is 7 which meet the requirement of the R-8 zone. No offsite improvement is proposed,
RECEIVED
JAN 292014
CITY OF RENrON
PLANNING DIVISION
Total excavation is approximately 4,631 cubic yards (3,113 cy in future ROW, 1,518 cy
in private properties) and total fill is approximately 210 cubic yard (47 cy in future ROW,
163 cy in private properties). Approximately 4,421 cubic yard of earth will be exported
from the site. Total estimated construction cost is approximately $650, I 05 and estimated
fair market value of the proposed project is $750,000.
There are total 69 significant trees (6" or larger caliper diameter) in the site. 49 of them
(23 conifer trees, 26 deciduous trees) will be removed. 20 of them (12 conifer trees, 8
deciduous trees) will be retained to meet the tree retention requirement. 18 of them are
located outside critical area buffer.
Approximately 0.5 acres of land will be dedicated to the City of Renton as public right-
of-way for the half street improvement of the access road.
A job shack may be located in one of the proposed lots during construction period. Sales
trailer or model home may also be used.
The project is not within 200-feet of Black River, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, May
Creek and lake Washington.
Water connection:
Water is available from Talbot Road South. A new 8 inch ductile iron water main will be
required to the site from an existing 12" water main that runs in Talbot Road South. The
new 8 inch water main may be terminated near the southeast comer of the site for future
extension to the adjacent property. It will likely not connect to the adjacent constructed
cul-de-sac due to differing pressure gradients. This main will need to be placed on the
adjacent property for at least a portion of this length. An easement will be required for
this also.
Sewer connection:
There is an existing gravity sewer main that runs along the south property line of the site
in the south adjacent property. Onsite sewer may be connected to this sewer main
provided that there is an easement to your south property line. There may be a
latecomers' fee associated with this connection.
Storm connection:
There is a storm system with pipes and catch basins that runs along the south property
line of the site on the adjacent property. Onsite run off may be connected to this system
after detention and water quality treatment. The access road will likely have a separate
detention and water quality treatment system which will also connect to the existing
storm system in Talbot Road South or the system on the adjacent southerly property.
Flow Control:
According to the City of Renton Flow Control Application Map, Level 2 flow control
with forest existing condition is required.
..
Water quality treatment:
Lot density of the proposed development is 6 (unit/acre). Basic water quality treatment is
required.
Cul-de-sac and access road:
After discussing with the Corey Thomas of the Fire Department, a full cul-de-sac may be
required if the south adjacent parcel may not be developed in the near future for possible
existence of wetland areas. A variance to the 35' minimum width of the half street
improvement is required due the pan handle shaped access road right of way is only 30'
wide.
Landscape:
Since the right of way width is only 30' wide within the 435' long pan handle, no
landscape strip is proposed within the pan handle area (a modification is required). East
of the pan handle, a 8' wide landscape strip is proposed between the back of curb and the
5' wide sidewalk within the half cul-de-sac area. Landscape areas are also proposed in
the detention/water quality treatment tract and in the front, back and side yards of the 5
proposed single family lots and in the east end of the access road.
engineeJ'J..rJ:!:.J
/Design!, ILL r::
C'_' ._g'''-l'ln9 ac
............... g COil'7lsLllkarJJ:£,;
15445 53 rd Avenue South, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431-7970 Fax: (206) 388-1648
Date: 12/0212013
Talbot Road South Short Plat Construction Mitigation
Description
Proposed development
The 1.37 acre subject property will be divided into 5 single family lots with a public
access street, a half cul-de-sac, ajoint use driveway tract, a sensitive area tract and a
detention/water quality treatment tract.
Construction Mitigation
The proposed construction will begin on May 1 and end on July 31. Working hours will
be limited from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday and no work on Sunday is
allowed, unless otherwise approved with a written decision by the City of Renton.
Proposed hauling/transportation routes are as follows:
From Talbot Road South, travel southbound to SW 43 rd Street to access northbound SR-
167 or continue travel to the intersection ofE Valley Road and SW 41 st Street to access
southbound SR-167.
Regular watering will be use to control dust during dry season. Traffic and transportation
to and from the site will be control to avoid peak hour traffic. Two lanes traffic (one for
each direction) will be maintained in Talbot Road South for most of the time. During
water and storm connection at Talbot Road South, at least one lane will keep open to
traffic. Traffic cones and flaggers will be used for traffic control during the construction
of water and storm connections.
Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control will be provided by utilizing BMPs
selected from the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. These BMPS will
likely include, but are not necessarily limited to, sediment trap, silt fencing, construction
safety fencing, interceptor v-ditches, rock check dams, plastic sheeting of stockpiles,
straw mulch, hydro-seeding, catch basin protection, and rocked construction entrance,
etc. See Temporary Erosion Control Plan for erosion and sediment control during
construction. RECEIVED
JAN 292014
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
High visibility construction fence will be installed along the mitigated wetland buffer
boundaries. Silt fences will be installed along the lower sides of the property boundaries.
Rock construction entrance will be installed at the entrance of Talbot Road South. The
excavation for the detention/wet vault can be used as a temporary erosion and sediment
control trap/pond. Interceptor v-ditches with check dams, temporary slope drains will be
used to temporary direct runoff's to the temporary erosion and sediment control trap/pond.
Disturbed soil will be protected by plastic covers, or straw mulch, or hydro-seeding.
Near by existing catch basins downstream of the site and new onsite catch basins will be
protect with catch basin filter inserts. At the end of construction, all the temporary
erosion and sediment control measures will be removed.
Permanent erosion and sediment control.
For Permanent Erosion and Sedimentation Control, roads, driveways and walkways will
be paved. Landscape areas will be covered with grass, trees and ground covers. All
onsite new impervious areas and new pervious areas will be treated by the combined
detention/wet vaults for detention and basic water quality treatment.
~ ,.4o.
: PACIFIC eNGINEERING DEwlGN I
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
December 30,2013
City of Renton
Attn: Gerald Wasser
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, W A 98057
RE: Talbot Road South Short Plat PED No. 13053 .
PRE 13-000639 Street Modification Request
Dear Mr. Wasser:
We are requesting a street modification for the Talbot Road South Short Plat project. Below, you
will find the City of Renton's code requirement for a half street improvement, a detailed
modification request and the justification for the modification.
Code requirement for half street improvement:
The right-of-way for the half street improvement must be a minimum ofthirtv five
feet (35') with twenty feet (20') paved. A curb, planting strip area, and sidewalk shall
be installed on the development side of the street according to the minimum design
standards for public streets.
Required sidewalk width is ~ and required planting strip width is ~ between curb and
walk for Residential Access and Limited Residential Access streets.
Modification Request:
Reduce the right-of-way width of the access road to 30' and waive the requirement
for a planting strip within the approximately 435' long panhandle area.
Justification for the modification:
The panhandle area is only 30' wide thus the right-of-way width for the access road
must be reduced to 30' wide within the panhandle area. 20' wide pavement plus 0.5'
concrete curb plus 5' sidewalk is 25.5'. Also, at least 2 to 3' of width is required for
the retaining wall along the north side of the access road. Thus, there is no width left
for the 8' wide planting strip within the 30' wide panhandle. Thus, we request that the
city waive the requirement for the 8' wide planting strip within the panhandle area.
East of the panhandle in the half cul-de-sac area where space is available, an 8'
planting strip is planned between the curb and 5' wide sidewalk as required by the
city code.
www,paceng.cam
15445 53RD AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98188 FAX 206 388~164B PHONE 425 251-881.1 2064331-7970
Gerald Wasser
Talbot Road South Short Plat
If you have questions, comments,
earliest opportunity. Thank you.
J
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
December 30, 2013
PED No. 13053
or need additional information, please contact me at your
Page 2 af2
1 .
2.
3.
City of Renton
TREE RETENTION
WORKSHEET
Total number of trees over 6" in diameter l on project site: 1. 69
Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation:
Trees that are dead, diseased or dangerous2
Trees in proposed public streets 7.
Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts 13
Trees in critical areas 3 and buffers 2
Total number of excluded trees: 2. 22
Subtract line 2 from line 1: 3. 47
trees
trees
trees
trees
trees
trees
trees
4. Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained4 , multiply line 3 by:
0.3 in zones RC, R-1, R-4, or R-S
0.1 in all other residential zones
0.05 in all commercial and industrial zones 4. __ ~1=-4=---__ trees
5. List the number of 6" or larger trees that you are proposing 5 to retain 4 :
5. 18 trees
6. Subtract line 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced:
(If line 6 is less than zero, stop here. No replacement trees are required).
6. ___ Nc.../_A __ trees
7. Multiply line 6by 12" for number of required replacement inches:
7. N/A
8. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement:
(Minimum 2" caliper Irees required) 8. N / A
9. Divide line 7 by line 8 for number of replacement trees6 :
(i1 remainder is .5 or greater, round up to the next whole number)
1. Measured at chest height.
9. N/A
inches
inches
per tree
trees
2 Dead, diseased or dangerous trees must be certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or
certified arborist, and approved by the City.
3 Critical Areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in Secti~. P"'I ~
Ihe Renlon Municipal Code (RMC). 1,( C\..~ t: IVE D
~ Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. JAN
5 The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number Of
2 9 2014
trees per RMC 4-4-130H7a CITY OF RENT
6 Inches 01 street trees, inches of trees added to critical areas/buffers, and inches of trees retaine8bt1~~!tJ@tol\jISIOON
are less than 6" but are greater than 2" can be used to meet the tree replacement requirement. N
H: \C EDIData\Forms" Templates \SeJ f-He! p Handouts \Plannin g\ T reeReLen ti on Worksheet. doc 12108
DENSITY
WORKSHEET
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
1. Gross area of property: 1. 58371 square feet
2. Certain areas are excluded from density calculations.
These include public roadways, private access
easements serving 3 or more dwelling units,
and critical areas.* Total excluded area:** 2. 24242 square feet
3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 3. 34129 square feet
4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 4. 0.783 acres
5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 5. ~ units/lots
6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. 6.38 d.u.lacre
~ lots or units would result in a net density of ~ dwelling units per acre.
'Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for
development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations
including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or f1oodways."
Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded.
•• Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded.
R:\t3053 TALBOT ROAD\densityworksheet\density.doc
RECEIVED
JAN 29 2014
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
Last updated: 12/30/2013 1
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
City of Renton Development Services Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the
quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the
agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be
done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,
you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need
to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write
"do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can
assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON PROJECT PROPOSALS:
Complete this checklist for non project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not
apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D) .
. For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the
checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal,"
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
R:113053 Talbot Road SouthlEnvironmental Checklistlenvchlst.doc11/01/13
RECEIVED
JAN 29 2014
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Talbot Road South Short Plat
2. Name of applicant:
Zachary Lazo, David Albers
Maldiz Investments, LLC.
1509 North 8dh Street
Seattle, WA 98103
Phone: (206) 683-8821
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Zachary Lazo, Da vid Albers
Maldiz Investments, LLC.
1509 North 8dh Street
Seattle, WA 98103
Phone: (206) 683-8821
4. Date checklist prepared:
September 9, 2013
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Apply, review, approval of preliminary short plat: November 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013.
Apply, review, approval of construction drawings: January 1, 2014 to April 15, 2014.
Construct plat infrastructure, apply, review and approval of final short plat: May 1,2014 to July 31,
2014.
Apply for building permits: August 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected
with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No further additions, expansion, or further activity is proposed related to this proposal.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal.
• Geotechnical Engineering Report will be prepared.
• Traffic Impact Analysis will be prepared.
• Wetland and Wildlife Assessment will be prepared.
• Level 1 Downstream Analysis will be prepared.
• Technical Information Report will be prepared.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\Environmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 2
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
• Issuance of a SEPA Threshold Determination by the City of Renton
• City of Renton Preliminary Plat approval
• City of Renton & Soos Creek Utility District approval of construction plans for site
infrastructure improvements (streets, storm drainage system, sanitary sewer system and
water system and site grading)
• Washington State Department of Ecology NPDES Permit
• City of Renton Final Plat approval
• Issuance of Building permits for single-family residences by the City of Renton's Development
Services Division (following later application)
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site.
The proposed project contemplates subdivision of approximately 1.37 acres into
(a) 5 residential lots for single-family detached homes,
(b) A public residential access street (half street) with half cul-de-sac,
(c) Separate tracts for storm drainage/detention and water quality facilities.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries
of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
Site Address: 3340 Talbot Road South, Renton, WA 98055
Parcel number: 302305-9071
The site is located in the NE J4 of the SE J4 of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
w.M. in the City of Renton. The site is located east of Talbot Road South between South 16f!"
Place and South 172'd Street.
Please see the enclosed Vicinity Map and project maps for location. Please see the enclosed plat
certificate and project plans for legal description.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rOlling,Qsteep slopes, mountainous,
other. 0
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?)
The steepest slope on the site is approximately 20% which is located near the entrance of
the site.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
prime farmland.
R:\13053 Talbot Road Soulh\Environmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 3
The site is mapped as containing Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15% slopes (AgC).
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
The west (lower) porlion of the access road to the site contains slopes larger than 15%.
Porlion of the access road and the south porlion of the site are located in the
moderate/unclassified coal mine hazard area.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate source of fill.
Approximatety 4,000 cubic yards of material will be removed from the site during mass
grading operations.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Erosion controls will be implemented prior to clearing in conformance with an engineered
Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) Plan to be submitted to the City of
Renton for review and approval along with project site infrastructure construction
drawings. Erosion control measures are expected to include Best Management Practices
such as construction of drainage ditches, installation of silt fencing, construction of
sedimentation control ponds, and construction access pads at the site entry and other
measures as appropriate.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Approximately 75% percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces, including
the proposed public roadway, private driveways, sidewalks, and future single-family
residential structures.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
As noted in Section B.1.f. above, temporary erosion and sedimentation control and Best
Management Practices will be implemented to control erosion and sedimentation during
site construction.
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\Environmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 4
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile,
odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If
any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Emissions and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment will be
produced during the construction phase of this project. The amount of such transitory
emissions to the air is expected to be minimal. Once the project is completed, emissions
will be those typically associated with a residential development (such as emissions from
furnaces and fireplaces).
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so.
generally describe.
The applicant is not aware of off-site sources of emissions or odors that will affect this
proposal.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
During the site work construction phase of the project, watering dusty portions of the site
to help control dust.
3. WATER
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type
and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
There is a small wetland (1100 sf±) near the east property line. A 25 feet wetland buffer
is proposed.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes. please describe and attach available plans.
A combined stormwater detention/wet vault with associated appurtenances, 5 single family homes
along with public road and utilities will be constructed outside the mitigated wetland buffer.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
None.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so. note location on the site plan.
No.
R:113053 Talbot Road SouthlEnvironmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 5
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
b. Ground Water:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No groundwater withdrawals are proposed as part of this project. Roof downspout
infiltration trenches may be installed in individual lots depends on soil conditions.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
The proposed project will discharge domestic sewer into a new public sanitary sewer
system. No waste material will be discharged into the ground.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water
flow into other waters, If so, describe.
Project generated storm water will be collected in a pipe and catch basin system and
routed to the proposed detention/wet vaults. The detention/wet vaults will be designed to
meet the City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual. Discharges from the
detention/wet vaults will be discharged to the existing drainage system that drains to
Panther Creek.
2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
Stormwater runoff from paved surface may include residue from petroleum-based
products associated with vehicular travel. These pollutants will be treated in the proposed
combined detention/wet vaults that will be designed to provide Basic water quality
treatment. Discharges from the detention/wet vaults will be discharged to the existing
drainage system that drains to Panther Creek.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any:
The proposed storm water facilities will be designed and constructed in conformance with
the City of Renton standards.
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder. maple, aspen, other
X evergreen tree: fir. cedar. pine, other
X shrubs
X grass
X pasture
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\Environmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 6
__ crop or grain
X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
__ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
__ other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Approximately 0.3 acres of forest, 0.4 acres of pasture and 0.5 acres of grass will be
removed along with the variety of deciduous and coniferous trees noted above in Section
A.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
No known threatened or endangered species on or near the subject property.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
Cleared and graded areas will be revegetated per City of Renton standards for single
family subdivisions.
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site:
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other ________ _
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other _________ _
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
No known threatened or endangered species on or near the subject property.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
The site may be part of the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
The wetland area and the mitigated wetland buffer area will remain undisturbed. Cleared and
graded areas will be revegetated per City of Renton standards for Single family
subdivisions.
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
The project is expected to use electric and natural gas energy sources for heating,
lighting, small appliances, and other uses as applicable.
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\Environmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 7
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe.
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
The future residences will be designed and constructed in conformance with the
Washington State Energy Code. No other energy conservation features are proposed.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this
proposal? If so, describe.
Portion of the site is located in a moderate/unclassified coal mine hazard area.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Typical emergency services for single-family residential uses will be required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Geotechnical engineer will identify potential coal mine hazard area and provide
recommendations for handling the potential hazard areas.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
None.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
During site construction, the noise of trucks and heavy equipment will create noise.
Construction-related noise will also be created by home construction activities on the site.
Because these activities will be short term, the associated noise will be short term.
Long term, traffic noise and other noise commonly associated with single-family
residential developments will ultimately be created by the proposed development.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Limitation of construction activities in accordance with the City of Renton's permitted work
hours.
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\Environmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 8
Current use of the site is single-family residence. The north and west of the site is
surrounded by single-family residences. The east and south adjacent properties are
undeveloped but there are public storm and sewer lines located in the south adjacent
property for other upstream developments.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe.
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
There is a single family residence on the site.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
The single family residence on the site will be removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The current zoning of the site is R-8.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The current comprehensive plan designation of the site is SFR -Single Family
Residential.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Not applicable.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,
specify.
The wetland in the west portion of the site is classified as environmentally sensitive area.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Approximately 15 people (3 per unit) would reside or work in the completed project.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A.
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any:
This project has been carefully designed to provide desirable housing in conformance
with the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan.
9. HOUSING
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\Environmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 9
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle,
or low-income housing.
Five new single family detached homes would ultimately be provided. The homes are
expected to be in the middle-income housing bracket.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
One middle income single-family residence will be eliminated.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None.
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
The tallest site structures will be single-family residential structures in accordance with the
City of Renton's maximum building height regulations for the R-8 zone.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
None.
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
Minor amounts of light or glare may occur from vehicles entering and exiting the site as
well as from internal streetlights along the proposed residential access street and from the
ultimately-constructed homes. These light sources are expected to occur during evening
and nighttime hours.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
None.
12. RECREATION
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\Environmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 10
The following recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity of the site:
Thomas Teasdale Park is 0.7 miles from the site.
Talbot Hill Reservoir Park is 1.0 miles from the site.
Lower Talbot Hill Park is 1.0 miles from the site.
Lake Street Park is 1.2 miles from the site.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None.
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
None know.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
No known landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance are known to be on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
If archaeological site(s) are discovered during excavation and/or construction, the
contractor will stop work in the vicinity of the site(s) and the owner will notify appropriate
agenc(ies) for direction as required by law.
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the
existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site will be accessed from Talbot Road South.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?
The following King County Metro Stops are available near the site:
Talbot Road South & South 37'h Street, 0.20 miles.
Talbot Road South & South 32'" Street, 0.20 miles.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate?
The project will have two parking spaces on each lot's driveway, for a total of 10 parking
spaces. The project would eliminate 2 parking spaces for the existing single family
residence.
R:113053 Talbot Road SouthlEnvironmental Checklistlenvchlst.doc 11
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or
streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or
private?
A public street (half street improvement) with half cul-de-sac is proposed for this project.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation?
If so, generally describe.
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
Approximately 30 vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project.
Peak volumes would occur in 7-9 am and 4-6 pm. 10 of these trips occur in the AM peak
hours. 13 of these trips occur in the PM peak hours.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None,
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a, Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
An minor increased need for public services, including fire protection, police protection,
health care, schools, and other services are expected to be needed for the project.
These needs will be typical for single-family residential development.
b, Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any,
No,
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle ~~~,?~E50fUS;V ~=~~===7~::::==:se:w3e:.o septic syste , ~
b, Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and
the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be
needed.
Puget Sound Energy will provide electricity and natural gas. Water will be provided by City
of Renton and sanitary sewer services will be provided by Soos Creek Utility District.
CenturyLink will provide telephone service, Comcast will provide cable television service,
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete, It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance
that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or
willful lack of full disclosure on my part,
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\Environmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 12
Proponent: . 7
/.-..
Name Printed:
Date:
~ I
j ! . .1"2 ? /f ?.,
R:\13053 Talbot Road South\Environmental Checklist\envchlst.doc 13
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and
ro rams. You do not need to fill out these sheets for rO'ect actions.
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the
list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities
likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than
if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production,
storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness,
wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,
wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow
or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
R:113053 Talbot Road SouthlEnvironmental Checklistlenvchlst.doc 14
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and
utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance
that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or
willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
Date:
ENVCHLST.DOC
REVISED 6/98
ff:~T~
R:113053 Talbot Road SouthlEnvironmental Checklistlenvchlst.doc 15
DRAFT
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
Maldiz Investments, LLC
1509 North 80 th Street
Seattle, WA 98103
Titles:
Grantor:
Grantee:
Declaration of Protective Covenants for Talbot Road South
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
Maldiz Investments, LLC, a Washington limited liability
company
Legal Description:
Tax ParceIID#'s:
Declaration of Protective Covenants for Talbot Road South
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
WHEREAS, MALDIZ INVESTMENTS, LLC (herein referred to as Declarant), is the owner
of certain real property in King County, Washington, included in the property to be platted as
Talbot Road South, according to the plat thereof recorded under Recording No. in
King County, Washington. In order to provide for land use restrictions as a part of such plan,
Declarant does hereby declare and establish the following restrictions, covenants and easements
appurtenant:
ARTICLE A
Definitions
Section 1. Definitions. As used herein, whether capitalized or not:
1. The words "Community Organization" and "Organization" shall refer to the Talbot Road
South Community Organization, a Washington nonprofit corporation, formed for the purpose of
enforcing these covenants and providing other things that may benefit its members.
2. The word "Committee" is defined as the Architectural Control Committee as provided
in Article C.
3. The words "Common Maintenance Areas" shall mean and refer to all real property in
the Plat that is owned by the Organization, or that is designated by Declarant for future ownership
by the Organization on a final plat or other recorded document creating a Phase, including certain
open space areas and improvements thereon, as well as any areas or facilities that the
Organization is charged with maintaining or monitoring. Common Maintenance Areas include:
(a) Landscaped areas in public right of way and the associated irrigation systems.
(b) All fencing installed by the Declarant as a plat amenity along the property lines of
(c) Mailbox structures. RECEIVED
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South JAN 29 2014
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
DRAFT
4. The words "Development Period" shall mean that period of time beginning on the date
this Declaration is recorded in the records of King County and ending on the earliest to occur of (i)
90 days after 100% of the lots subject to this declaration have had single family residences
constructed thereon and have been sold as residences; (ii) December 31, 2025; or (iii) the date
upon which a Supplementary Declaration is recorded by Declarant terminating the Development
Period.
5. The words "Governing Documents" shall mean and refer to this Declaration, any
Supplementary Declarations subsequently filed, the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the
Organization.
6. The word "Lot" shall refer to a lot as shown on any Plat as defined hereby but shall not
include a parcel designated a "Tract" or "Parcel" on a Plat.
7. The word "Owner" shall mean and refer to the record owner, whether one or more
persons, of the fee simple title to a Lot, excluding, however, any person holding such interest
merely as security for the payment or satisfaction of an obligation. The Declarant and any
Participating Builder(s) are Owners under this definition.
8. The words "Participating Builder" shall mean a party that purchases an unimproved Lot
or Lots from the Declarant for the purposes of building residences on such Lot or Lots, and
offering such residence(s) for sale.
9. The word "Plat" shall refer to the plat of Talbot Road South, Lots 1 through 5.
10. The words "Protected Areas" shall refer to any Native Growth Protection Areas
("NGPAs"), Native Vegetation Protection Easements ("NVPEs"), any other areas recorded on the
plat as environmentally protected areas, wetlands, streams, and open spaces.
11. The word "Subdivision" shall refer to the real property included within any Plat as
defined hereby.
ARTICLE B
Building and Land Use Restrictions
Section 1. Improvements. No dwelling, residence, outbuilding, fence, landscaping, wall,
building, pool, sport court or other structure or other improvement shall be erected, altered, placed
or maintained on any Lot unless it shall comply with the following:
(a) Prior to placing any such structure or making such improvement on the Lot, the plans
and specifications for the structure or improvement and a request for approval shall be submitted
to and approved by the Committee as provided in Article C. When constructed or placed on the
Lot, the structure or improvement shall substantially conform to the plans and specifications
approved by the Committee.
(b) Prior to making any change or alteration to the external appearance of any existing
improvements on a Lot, plans and specifications for the alteration and change shall be submitted
to and approved by the Committee as provided in Article C. When made, the changes or
alteration shall substantially conform to the plans and speCifications as approved by the
Committee.
(c) Once started, the work of constructing, altering, repairing, or reconstructing any
structure or improvement on a Lot shall be diligently prosecuted until completion thereof and in
any event the exterior of the structure shall be completed and finished within six months after the
work first commences unless the work relates to the initial home construction.
(d) All buildings and improvements on a Lot shall be of permanent construction, and no
temporary structure, trailer, mobile home, tent, garage, outbuilding or other similar device shall be
placed on any Lot, except with the permission of the Committee. This provision shall not apply to
the Declarant during the Development Period, including the initial home construction period.
(e) Lots shall be used solely for residential purposes and related facilities normally
incidental to a residential community except as allowed by Section 5 below. No building shall be
erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain on any Lot except for one (1) detached single
family dwelling and permitted accessory building.
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 2
DRAFT
(f) Accessory buildings which are appurtenant to the use of an existing permanent
residential building shall be permitted on a Lot. Permitted accessory buildings shall include,
without limitation, greenhouses, playhouses, tool sheds, woodsheds, doghouses, dog runs, dog
enclosures and gazebos. No accessory building shall be placed on a Lot unless the plans for the
accessory building have been first approved as to the design, materials and location on the Lot by
the Committee. The Committee may refuse to approve an accessory building if, in the exercise of
the discretion of the Committee, the structure detracts from the general visual appearance to the
neighborhood or other homes based on adopted standards and controls. The location of an
accessory building shall be at a place which minimizes visual impact as viewed from surrounding
properties, tracts and rights-of-way and, as a general guideline, shall be in the side or rear yard
behind the front of the house. The Committee shall not be bound by the guidelines, but may
exercise its discretion in that respect. The Committee may require visual screening of accessory
buildings from adjacent Lots.
(g) All structures and improvements shall comply with the provisions of applicable
building and zoning codes, as amended from time to time, relating to site improvements, setback
requirements, drainage easements and other easements or buffers; provided that nothing herein
shall require removal of a building which was originally placed in conformity with such Code
because of change in the Codes.
(h) No fence or wall shall be permitted on a Lot if it is nearer to any street than the face of
the house and/or garage as constructed on the Lot except that nothing shall prevent the erection
of (i) a necessary retaining wall and (ii) decorative walls, fences, hedges and mass plantings
which have been approved by the Committee as to appearance prior to installation. Additionally,
fences that are permitted on the side lot lines of corner lots where those lot lines abut a street
shall be subject to corner fence standards as established by the Committee and subject to
setbacks as conditions to approval by the Committee. At no time shall any fence, wall, hedge, or
mass planting functioning as a hedge, where permitted, extend higher than six (6) feet above the
ground without the approval of the Committee. Fences shall be strictly in compliance with design
guidelines established by the Committee, which standards may provide for limited acceptable
styles, materials, and/or specifications. All fences shall be of approved designs and color as
established by Rules by the Committee.
(i) No lines or wires for the transmission of electric current or of television, radio or
telephone signals shall be constructed, placed or permitted to be placed outside of the buildings of
a Lot, unless the lines and wires shall be underground or in conduit attached to a building.
0) No exterior aerials, antennas, microwave receivers or satellite dishes for television or
other purposes shall be permitted on any lot except for satellite dishes up to 24" in diameter that
may be installed on the sides or the rear of the home. Installation of such satellite dishes shall be
subject to the approval of the Committee. When mounted on the side of the home, they should
be placed on the rear third of the house as close to the roof overhang as possible. Rear mounted
satellite dishes should be mounted near the corner of the home as close to the roof overhang as
possible. No satellite dishes may be mounted on the front of the home. If reception requires a
mounting location other than those specified above, a site review by the Committee is required
prior to approval. Solar panels shall be allowed as provided for in state law; the Committee may
regulate location and require screening to the extent allowed under state law.
(k) Seasonal decorative lights are allowed on the homes and landscaping improvements
from October 15th through January 10'h only unless otherwise approved in writing by the
Committee.
(I) All mailbox structures are to be of a uniform design as approved by the Committee
and local post office.
Section 2. Animals. No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred, or
kept on any Lot except that usual household pets such as dogs, cats and small birds may be kept,
provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for commercial purposes, and that they do not
unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of any part of the Subdivision. No domestic
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 3
DRAFT
pet may be kept if it is a source of annoyance or a nuisance. The Committee shall have the
authority to determine whether a particular pet is a nuisance or a source of annoyance, and such
determination shall be final and conclusive. Dogs shall not be allowed to run at large. Leashed
animals are permitted within the right-of-way. Pets shall be confined within the property or
attended at all times.
Section 3. Signs. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any Lot
except (1) entry signs identifying the neighborhood, (2) one sign of not more than five (5) square
feet advertising the property for sale or rent, (3) political signs consistent with state law and City or
County ordinance, and (4) signs used by the Declarant or Participating Builder of a residence on
the Lot to advertise the property and identify the Declarant or Participating Builder during the
construction and sales period of the residence. Participating Builder and Declarant signs may
include project marketing signs, directional signs and model home signs. During the
Development Period, Declarant shall review and approve all Participating Builder signs prior to
posting. Political signs may not be displayed more than sixty (60) days before an election and
must be removed within seven (7) days following the election date. Political signs may not be
placed on Tracts or Right of Way owned or maintained by the Community Organization. This
Section shall not be applicable to the flag of the United States of America where such display is
consistent with state and federal laws.
Section 4. Nuisances. No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for
rubbish; and trash, garbage, or other waste shall not be kept except for in sanitary containers or
composting areas. Equipment for the storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean
and sanitary condition and out of sight. All animal waste must be removed from lots, Tracts and
rights of way by the animal's owners or the Lot owner. All animal pens and enclosures shall be
kept clean and odor free at all times. Nothing shall be done on a lot which may become a
nuisance to the neighborhood.
Section 5. Businesses. No trade, craft, business, profession, manufacturing, commercial
enterprise or commercial activity of any kind which shall interfere with the quiet and peaceful use
and enjoyment of any part of the Subdivision shall be conducted or carried on upon any Lot or
within any building located within the Subdivision. The evidence of said interference shall be
either visible from the street or adjacent Lots, shall increase the noise level in the surrounding
area, or shall increase traffic or decrease available parking to other than usual residential
volumes. This Section shall not operate to limit operation of an adult family home if permitted
under state law and City or County ordinance; however, improvements constructed for such
operation may be reviewed by the Committee and must comply with this Declaration. All
permitted businesses must comply with any applicable City or County ordinances.
Section 6. Storage. No goods, materials, supplies or equipment, and no boats, trucks,
motorcycles, busses, motor homes, campers, trailers, or vehicles of any description, shall be kept,
stored, dismantled, or repaired in the street, driveway, or within view from the street in the
Subdivision or in any part of the Subdivision outside of an approved fenced area or permitted
structure. This Section shall not preclude the temporary parking of passenger vehicles in the
driveway. Temporary parking shall generally mean for periods not greater than 48 hours. Garage
parking spaces shall mean the number of parking spaces within a garage attached to a residence
equal to the number of garage bays adjacent to the garage door(s). Except as specifically
allowed in this Section, all passenger vehicles, which is defined as passenger automobiles, non-
commercial vans and trucks, motorcycles, and similar type vehicle, used regularly and primarily as
transportation for the occupants of the Lot, shall be parked within a garage parking space. In the
event the Lot Owner and residents of the residence have more vehicles than garage parking
spaces, then, the driveway area in front of the garage may be used for parking additional
passenger vehicles. Passenger vehicles shall be parked only within garages or on the driveway
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 4
DRAFT
for a period of time not to exceed a continuous forty-eight (48) hour period. No commercial and/or
recreational vehicle shall be permitted on the driveway or any other portion of the Owner's Lot. No
vehicles parking on the driveway may extend over the sidewalk and/or into the right-of-way.
Owners who have visiting guests intending to stay may secure written permission from the
Community Organization for such guests to park their vehicle upon the Lot owned by the Owner
for a maximum period of one (1) week within a thirty (30) day period. Such a privilege shall only
exist, however, after the written permission has been obtained from the Community Organization.
During the Development Period, the Declarant and any Participating Builder may store equipment
and building materials and maintain temporary trash storage sites within the Subdivision.
Section 7. Firearms and Related Activity. No firearms, whether for hunting or target
practice, shall be discharged in the Subdivision.
Section 8. View Protection. No trees or shrubs on a Lot other than those existing at the
time this Declaration is filed, shall be allowed to grow to a size that noticeably and unreasonably
interferes with a view of significance from another residence. The Committee shall be the sole
judge in deciding whether the view is of significance and whether there has been unreasonable
interference with the view. Should the Committee determine that there is an unreasonable
interference, it shall notify the Member of such tree or shrub in writing, specifying the nature of the
interference, what should be done to eliminate the interference, and the time in which such action
should be taken.
Section 9. Exterior Colors. Any changes to the exterior color of any improvement located
on a Lot must be approved by the Committee prior to the commencement of the painting or
construction of the improvement.
Section 10. Swimming Pools. No swimming pools, lap pools, or spas shall be
constructed, erected, or maintained upon any lot without the prior written consent of the
Committee and in no event shall any above ground swimming pool be permitted with the
exception of children's wading pools. The Committee may disallow any or all pools or spas in
their sole discretion and shall have the authority to establish the rules and regulations governing
the use of any such facilities. Considerations shall include, but not be limited to, the visual and
audio intrusion such facility and associated activities would have on surrounding residences. The
installation of any such facility shall be in accordance with the plans approved by the Committee in
addition to all local and state building ordinances and use of such facility shall be in strict
compliance with the conditions of approval set down by the Committee.
Section 11. Gardens. Play Equipment. Sport Courts. Pools and Spas. Any vegetable
garden, hammock, statuary, play equipment, sports equipment, sport courts, pool or spa which
has received the approval of the Committee and is to be erected on any Lot may only be located
between the rear residence line and the rear Lot line or the rear yard side of a fence, if a fence
has been constructed. No permanent and/or portable basketball standards or other play
equipment may be situated in any private or public right-of-way. No basketball backboard may be
attached to the residence. Portable basketball standards need not be submitted for approval but
must be properly stored on the rear side of the residence or in the garage and may not be stored
in the front or sides of the residence or anywhere which allows the standard to be visible from the
street. Any violation of these restrictions may result in the removal of such device. The
Committee may require visual screening of play equipment, sports equipment, sport courts. pool
and spas.
Section 12. Rules and Regulations. In addition to the above restrictions, the Committee
may. from time to time, without consent of the Members, promulgate. modify or delete rules
applicable to performing its function to maintain architectural control throughout the Community.
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 5
DRAFT
Such rules shall be distributed to all Members prior to the date that they are to become effective
and shall thereafter be binding upon all Members until and unless overruled, canceled, or
modified.
Section 13. Construction and Sale Period. So long as Declarant owns any property in the
Community for development and/or sale, the restrictions set forth in this Article B shall not be
applied or interpreted so as to prevent, hinder, or interfere with development, construction or sales
activities of Declarant or any Participating Builder.
ARTICLE C
Architectural Control
Section 1. Board of Directors and Architectural Control Committee. A Board of Directors
of the Community Organization shall be elected in the manner described in the Organization's
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. An Architectural Control Committee shall be appointed and
organized in the manner described in the Organizations Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. The
address of the Board and the Committee shall be the registered office of the Community
Organization.
Section 2. Submission of Plans. Prior to construction, all plans and specifications or
information required to be submitted to the Committee for approvals shall be submitted together
with an Architectural Committee Application Form in person or by mail to the address of the
Committee. Submittals must be in writing, shall contain a written request for approval and the
name and address of the person submitting the same and the Lot involved, and shall set forth the
following with respect to a proposed structure: The location of the structure or improvement upon
the Lot, the elevation of the structure with reference to the existing and finished lot grade, the
general design, the interior layout, the exterior finish materials and color including roof materials,
the landscape plan, and such other information as may be required to determine whether such
structure conforms with these restrictions. The Committee may require applicants to notify
adjacent property owners of their request for approval.
Section 3. Standards. The Committee shall have the authority to determine and establish
standards involving aesthetic considerations of harmony of construction and color which it
determines to be in the best interest of providing for attractive development of the Subdivision,
which authority shall include but not be limited to determining the height, configuration, design and
appearance of the dwelling and fences, walls, outbuildings, pools, and other structures and
improvements appurtenant to the use of the dwelling. Such determinations may be amended and
shall be binding on all persons.
Section 4. Approval or Disapproval. Within 30 days after the receipt of plans and
specifications or information with a request for approval, the Committee shall by majority vote
approve or disapprove the request. The Committee may disapprove any request which in its
opinion does not conform to these restrictions or its aesthetic or other standards. Approval or
disapproval of a request shall be made upon one of the copies thereof and returned to the
address shown on the request. If the Committee fails to approve or disapprove submitted plans
and specifications within 30 days after the plans and specifications have been submitted, which
submission shall be evidenced by a written receipt for said plans and specifications, approval will
not be required, and this Section will be deemed to have been fully complied with. If the plans and
specifications submitted are incomplete and the Committee requests additional information in
order to approve or disapprove said request, the thirty (30) day period shall be counted from the
date of complete information being delivered to the Committee. In the event the request is
approved by the inaction of the Committee within the thirty (30) day period, any such plans and
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 6
DRAFT
specifications shall nevertheless be in compliance with all the restrictions contained in these
Protective Covenants.
Section 5. Advisors. The Committee may appoint advisors or advisory committees from
time to time to advise on matters pertaining to the Subdivision.
Section 6. Variations. The Committee shall have the authority to approve plans and
specifications which do not conform to these restrictions in order to overcome practical difficulties
or prevent hardships in the application of these restrictions; provided that such variations so
approved (a) must be in writing and (b) shall not be materially injurious to the improvements of
other Lots and shall not constitute a waiver of the restrictions herein contained but shall be in
furtherance of the purposes and intent of these restrictions.
Section 7. Responsibilities. Owners shall be responsible for informing contractors,
agents and others working on the Lot of the standards and conditions of all approvals issued by
the Committee and shall be responsible for correcting any and all violations of those standards
and conditions. No member of the Committee or person acting for it shall be responsible for any
defect in any plan or specification submitted or approved, or for any defect in any work done
according to such plans and specifications.
Section 8. Release. Plans and specifications are not approved by the Committee for
engineering or structural design or quality of materials, and by approving such plans and
specifications neither the Committee, the members thereof, nor the Organization assumes liability
or responsibility therefor, nor for any defect in any structure constructed from such plans and
specifications. Neither Declarant, the Organization, the Committee, the Board, nor the officers,
directors, members, employees, and agents of any of them shall be liable in damages to anyone
submitting plans and specifications to any of them for approval, or to any owner of property
affected by these restrictions by reason of mistake in jUdgment, negligence, or nonfeasance
arising out of or in connection with the approval or disapproval or failure to approve or disapprove
any such plans or specifications. Every person who submits plans or specifications and every
Owner agrees that such person or Owner will not bring any action or suit against Declarant, the
Organization, the Committee, the Board, or the officers, directors, members, employees, and
agents of any of them to recover any damages and hereby releases, remises, quitclaims, and
covenants not to sue for all claims, demands, and causes of action arising out of or in connection
with any negligence, or nonfeasance and hereby expressly waives the provisions of any law which
provides that a general release does not extend the claims, demands, and causes of action not
known at the time the release is given.
Section 9. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by applicable Washington law,
the Organization shall indemnify the Committee members against any and all expenses including
without limitation, attorneys' fees, imposed upon or reasonably incurred by any Committee
member in connection with any action, suit, or other proceeding (including settlement of any suit
or proceeding) to which such Committee member may be a party by reason of being or having
been a Committee member. The Committee members shall not be liable for any mistake of
judgment, negligent or otherwise, except for their own willful misfeasance, malfeasance,
misconduct or bad faith. The Committee members shall have no personal liability with respect to
any contract or other commitment made by them, in good faith, on behalf of the Committee, and
the owners shall indemnify and forever hold each such Committee member free and harmless
against any and all liability to others on account of any such contract or commitment. Any right to
indemnification provided for herein shall not be exclusive of any other rights to which any
Committee member may be entitled.
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 7
Section 1. Initial Landscaping.
ARTICLE D
Landscaping
DRAFT
(a) Timing. Prior to occupancy of any residential building on a Lot, the front and rear
yards of the Lot shall be landscaped; provided that if weather conditions or ground
conditions due to weather are such that it is not reasonable to landscape the Lot
within the time provided, the time for completion of the landscaping shall be extended
for a period of thirty (30) days after weather conditions and ground conditions due to
weather are reasonable for landscaping. Any dispute over the time when weather or
ground conditions due to weather are reasonable for landscaping may be determined
by the Committee which determination shall be binding upon all interested parties.
(b) Tree Retention and Mitigation. As part of meeting the tree retention and mitigation
requirements specified in NMC 18.16, each lot shall install a minimum of three (3)
and a maximimum of five (5) trees of 2" caliper or greater at the time of initial
landscaping. Each lot will be responsible for installing and maintaining a minimum of
ten (10) caliper inches of trees at the time of initial landscaping. The trees shall be
deciduous and/or evergreen native species and varieties that are approved by the
City. Ornamental tree varietys are not considered meeting the definition of "significant
trees" in NMC 18.06.598 and will not be counted toward meeting the tree retention
mitigation requirements.
Section 2. Landscape and Fence Maintenance. The owners of each Lot shall maintain
the landscaping on the Lot in a neat, healthy and presentable condition at all times and shall not
permit the Lot to become overgrown or allow weeds and other noxious plants to proliferate on the
Lot. The obligation to maintain landscaping shall extend into the public right of way along each
Lot which has been or is required to have been landscaped to the sidewalk or street curb in front
of and along side of the Lot, as applicable. A program of regular scheduled maintenance which
includes watering, fertilizing, cutting and trimming of lawns and plantings, removing dead plants,
trees and bushes, is considered the responsibility of the homeowner. In accordance with Article
E, Section 2, the Community Organization shall be responsible for maintaining, repairing and
replacing fencing installed by the Declarant as a plat amenity along the property lines of Tracts
and Rights of Way. This shall include the staining of the fencing on the exterior side of the fence
and the replacement of broken fenceboards. Other than the aforementioned fences, the owners
of each Lot shall maintain any fence located on its Lot by keeping it in good repair. This
includes staining any exterior fencing which faces the right of way or is visible from the right of
way and replacing damaged fenceboards. After giving reasonable notice, as defined by the Board
of Directors, to the owner of the Lot, the Community Organization has the authority to remedy, at
the Lot owner's expense, any violations of this Section 2. The Community Organization reserves
the right to enter adjoining tracts that abut lots in order to perform maintenance deemed
necessary for public health and safety.
ARTICLE E
Easements and Open Space
Section 1. Construction. Utility and Drainage Easements. Easements for the
construction, repair, replacement, reconstruction, and maintenance of utilities and drainage
facilities for the benefit of the Organization are hereby created and established over, across, and
under the ten (10) feet in width of the portion of each Lot abutting a street. Easements for the
construction, repair, reconstruction and maintenance of drainage facilities are hereby created and
established over, across, and under a five (5) foot wide strip along each side of interior lot lines
and over the rear ten (10) feet of each lot. In the event lot lines are adjusted after the recording of
the plat, the easements shall move with the adjusted lot lines. No structure (other than rockeries,
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 8
DRAFT
retaining walls, decks, patios and walkways installed with original home construction and fencing
approved by the Committee), planting or other material which may damage or interfere with the
installation and maintenance of utilities or facilities, or which may change the direction of flow of
drainage channels in the easements, or which may obstruct or retard the flow of water through the
drainage channels in the easements, shall be placed or permitted to remain within any of these
easements. The portion of these easements on each Lot shall be maintained by the owner of the
Lot, except for those improvements within the easements the maintenance for which a public
authority, utility company, or the Community Organization is responsible.
Section 2. Maintenance of Facilities. The Community Organization shall be responsible
for maintaining, repairing and replacing:
(a) Landscaped areas in public right of way and the associated irrigation systems.
(b) EXCEPT, the landscaping in the cul-de-sac bulb shall be jOintly maintained by the
abutting lot owners.
(c) All fencing installed by the Declarant as a plat amenity along the property lines of
Tracts and Right of Way.
(e) Mailbox structures.
Section 3. Access Easements. The Organization and its agents shall have an easement
for access to each Lot and to the exterior of any building located thereon during reasonable hours
as may be necessary for the purposes stated below. Owners hereby grant to the Organization,
the Board. and the Declarant, and their individual agents, an express access easement for
purposes of going upon the Lots of Owners for the following purposes:
(a) The maintenance, repair, replacements, or improvement of any Common
Maintenance Area accessible from that Lot;
(b) Emergency repairs necessary to prevent damage to the Common Maintenance Areas
or to another Lot or the improvements thereon;
(c) Cleaning, maintenance, repair, or restoration work which the Owner is required to do
but has failed or refused to do; and
(d) The removal of Vehicles, goods, equipment, devices or other objects which are
parked or stored in violation of the terms of this Declaration.
Except in an emergency where advanced notice is not possible, these easements shall be
exercised only after reasonable notice to the Lot Owner.
Section 4. Right of Entrv. The Community Organization reserves the right to enter upon each
Lot for the purposes of inspection and the performance of maintenance of the facilities listed in
this Article E.
Section 5. Protected Areas. The Organization, Owners, and their guests, agents,
contractors, and employees are strictly prohibited from using any Protected Area in the Plat in a
manner contrary to the local jurisdiction's rules and regulations, including dumping, erecting
structures, constructing landscape features, cutting or removing vegetation, using pesticides,
and/or planting any vegetation without authorization. Owners shall not fence off or otherwise
exercise any dominion or control over any Protected Area.
Section 6. Damage Caused by Owner. In the event that the Organization determines that the
need for maintenance, repair, or replacement of any improvements within any tract or Common
Maintenance Area that is the responsibility of the Organization hereunder is caused through the
willful or negligent act of an Owner, or the family, guests, lessees, or invitees of any Owner, the
Organization may perform such maintenance, repair or replacement at such Owner's sole cost
and expense, and all costs thereof shall be added to and become a part of the assessment to
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 9
DRAFT
which such Owner is subject and shall become a lien against the Lot of such Owner, In the event
the Organization determines that perimeter fencing abutting any Lot has not be adequately
maintained, the Organization may perform such maintenance, repair or replacement at such
Owner's sole cost and expense, and all costs thereof shall be added to and become a part of the
assessment to which such Owner is subject and shall become a lien against the Lot of such
Owner pursuant to the process set forth in Article F, Declarant may, without obligation, replant
any damages or removed landscape plantings from any Protected Area or Lot, repair any damage
or destruction thereto, or remove any encroachment from any Protected Area, For a period of
three (3) years, or as determined by the local jurisdiction, following transition of control over the
Organization from the Declarant, the Organization and any Owner shall be responsible to the
Declarant for any damage or destruction to, or encroachment into any Protected Area, caused in
whole or in part by any Owner or the Organization or guests, agents, contractors, or employees of
either. The Organization and/or Owner shall promptly pay Declarant the costs to fully remedy any
such damage or destruction,
ARTICLE F
Liens
Section 1, Community Organization Membership, There shall be one membership in the
Community Organization for each Lot in the Subdivision subject hereto and no more, The fee title
owner of a Lot, which Lot is not subject to a recorded contract for purchase and sale, or the holder
of the vendee's interest under a recorded contract for purchase and sale of a Lot, shall hold a
membership in the Community Organization, Such membership shall be appurtenant to and not
severable from such fee ownership or vendee's interest and shall transfer with the transfer of the
fee title or vendee's interest without further action on the part of the Community Organization or its
several members, Membership shall stand in the name or names of the persons or parties who
have such interests from time to time as they may appear in the public record,
Section 2, Lien, In order to provide for the proper operation of the Community
Organization, for the maintenance and improvement of any property which the Community
Organization is obligated to maintain and for the administrative costs of the Community
Organization, each grantee and vendee of Lots, their heirs, successors and assigns shall and do,
by the act of accepting a deed of a Lot or entering into a contract of sale of a Lot, as vendee,
jointly and severally agree that they and each of them shall hold the membership in the
Community Organization appurtenant to the Lot and shall pay to the Community Organization the
assessments, dues and charges levied according to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of
the Community Organization against that membership,
No Owner may waive or otherwise avoid liability for assessments, dues and charges by
non-use of the Common Maintenance Areas or Protected Areas or abandonment of the Lot.
Any assessment, due or charge, or installment thereof delinquent for a period of more
than ten (10) days shall incur a late charge in an amount as the Board may from time to time
determine,
In the event that any such dues or charges remain unpaid to the Community Organization
for a period of 60 days after the due date, then the Community Organization may place a written
notice of public record in King County, Washington, that the Community Organization claims a lien
against the Lot to which the membership is appurtenant for the amount of delinquent
assessments, dues and charges together with any late charges, interest at the rate of twelve
percent per annum from the date due until paid, and attorneys' fees, as herein provided, From
and after recording such notice, and not prior to such recording, the Lot to which the membership
is appurtenant shall be subject to a lien to the Community Organization as security for all unpaid
CC&Rs, Talbot Road South 10
DRAFT
dues and charges accrued until the lien arising because of the notice is released by the
Community Organization.
Any dues and charges hereunder, together with any interest, costs and reasonable
attorney's fees, shall also be a personal obligation of the person who was the Owner of the Lot at
the time the dues and charges were due.
The lien herein granted to the Community Organization shall be subordinate to the lien of
any bona fide mortgage or deed of trust given for value recorded prior to the recording of the
notice of claim of lien.
A release of a lien shall only release the lien arising because of the notice but not rights
under this Article to file a subsequent notice of claim of lien for subsequent delinquencies after a
notice is released.
Such lien may be foreclosed in the manner of a mortgage of real property and in such
foreclosure action, the Community Organization shall recover a reasonable sum as attorneys' fees
therein and the reasonable and necessary costs of searching and abstracting the public record.
The Organization shall have power of sale for any lien.
Notwithstanding any provisions hereof appearing to the contrary, the sale or transfer of
title to a Lot pursuant to a mortgage foreclosure or any proceeding in lieu thereof, shall extinguish
the lien created hereby for any unpaid dues and charges which became due prior to such sale or
transfer, except to the extent of personal obligation upon the Owner; provided that no sale or
transfer shall relieve such Lot from a lien for dues and charges thereafter becoming due and
provided further that "mortgage" as used in this sentence means a mortgage, deed of trust or
other security given for a debt which is guaranteed by the Veterans Administration or FHA as
agencies of the United States government and debt which has been sold to FNMA (Fannie Mae)
or FMAC (Freddie Mac).
Section 3. Special Assessments for Improvements. In addition to the annual
assessments set forth in the Articles and Bylaws, and the dues and charges provided for herein,
the Community Organization may levy, in any assessment year, a common assessment,
applicable to that year only, for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any
maintenance, construction, reconstruction, repair or replacement of any improvement or capital
improvement upon the Common Maintenance Areas and/or Protected Areas. Within thirty (30)
days after adoption by the Board of Directors of the special assessments for capital
improvements, the Board shall set a meeting of the members to consider ratification of the special
assessment in the same formal process as the ratification of the annual budget, as set forth in the
Bylaws.
Section 4. Uniform Rate of Assessment. Both annual and special assessments must be
fixed as a uniform rate for all Lots and must be collected on an annual basis.
Section 5. Start-Up Fee. Upon the sale of each Lot by the Declarant, the purchaser shall
pay a one-time start up fee of Two Hundred and Fifty and no/l00 ($250.00) Dollars per Lot. Such
start-up fee shall be paid on or before the date of recordation of the deed from Declarant to the
purchaser. Declarant shall be entitled to collect this one-time start-up fee at the closing of the Lot
sale and submit said fee to the Community Organization. This one-time start-up fee shall be used
to defray organizational and operational costs for the Community Organization. The Declarant
may waive the start-up fee in sale of Lots to Participating Builders. In such event, the one-time
start up fee shall be paid on or before the date of recordation of the deed from Participating
Builder to the purchaser.
Section 6. Enforcement of Assessments. The Board may take such action as is
necessary, including the institution of legal proceedings, to enforce the provisions of this Article.
In the event the Board begins an action to enforce any such rights, the prevailing party shall be
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South II
DRAFT
entitled to its attorney's fees, costs and expenses incurred in the course of such enforcement
action as provided herein.
ARTICLEG
General Provisions
Section 1. Effect. The covenants, restrictions, easements, rights, liens, and
encumbrances herein provided for shall be covenants running with the land and shall be binding
upon the Subdivision and any and all parts thereof, the parties in interest thereto and their heirs,
assigns, personal representatives and successors in interest. Accepting an interest in and to any
Lot or portion of the Subdivision, whether or not it shall be so expressed in any deed or other
instrument, shall constitute an agreement by any person, firm or corporation accepting such
interest, that they and each of them shall be bound by and subject to the provisions of this
Declaration, the governing documents, and all rules and regulations applicable to the Lots duly
promulgated pursuant to action by the Organization or its Board or Committee.
Section 2. Severability. In the event that any provision hereof shall be declared to be
invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, no other provision shall be affected thereby, and the
remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. No waiver of the breach of any provision
hereof shall constitute a waiver of a subsequent breach of any provision hereof or constitute a
waiver of a subsequent breach of the same provision or of any other provision. No right of action
shall accrue for or on account of the failure of any person to exercise any right hereunder nor for
imposing any provision, condition, restriction or covenant which may be unenforceable.
Section 3. Enforcement. The parties in interest in and to any part of the Plat and the
Community Organization, for the benefit of the Owners of the Plat, and each of them shall have
the right and authority to enforce the provisions hereof, including all covenants and restrictions,
and in addition to any other remedy for damages or otherwise, shall have the right to injunctive
relief. Failure by the Board or Organization or any Owner to enforce any provision of this
Declaration or the governing documents shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so
in the future.
Section 4. Fines. In the event a Lot Owner violates any of the covenants, conditions,
and/or restriction set forth in this Declaration, the Organization has the right to assess fines for
said violations. The Board of Directors shall adopt rules and regulations which shall set forth the
fines for violations of any of the covenants, conditions, and/or restrictions set forth in this
document.
Section 5. Duration. This Declaration shall run with and bind the Plat, and shall inure to
the benefit of and shall be enforceable by the Organization or any Owner, their respective legal
representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, perpetually to the extent provided by law;
provided, however, so long as and to the extent that Washington law limits the period during
which covenants restricting land to certain uses may run, any provisions of this Declaration
affected thereby shall run with and bind the land so long as permitted by such law, after which
time, any such provision shall be (a) automatically extended (to the extent allowed by applicable
law) for successive periods of ten (10) years, unless a written instrument reflecting disapproval
signed by the then Owners of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the Lots within the Plat and
the Declarant (during the Development Period) has been recorded within the year immediately
preceding the beginning of a ten (10) year renewal period agreeing to change such provisions, in
whole or in part, or to terminate the same, in which case this Declaration shall be modified or
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 12
DRAFT
terminated to the extent specified therein; or (b) extended as otherwise provided by law. Every
purchaser or grantee of any interest (including, without limitation, a security interest) in any real
property subject to this Declaration, by acceptance of a deed or other conveyance therefore,
thereby agrees that such provisions of this Declaration may be extended and renewed as
provided in this Section.
Section 6. Perpetuities. If any of the covenants, conditions, restrictions, or other
provisions of this Declaration shall be unlawful, void, or voidable for violation of the rule against
perpetuities, then such provisions shall continue only until twenty-one (21) years after the death of
the last survivor of the now-living descendants of the individuals signing this Declaration.
Section 7. Insurance. The Organization may purchase as a Common Maintenance Area
expense and shall have authority to and may obtain insurance for the Common Maintenance
Areas against loss or damage by fire or other hazards in an amount sufficient to cover the full
replacement value in the event of damage or destruction. It may also obtain a comprehensive
public liability policy covering the Common Maintenance Areas. The comprehensive liability
coverage shall be in amount to be determined by the Board. The Board may also obtain
insurance to cover the Board, the Organization, its agents and employees from any action brought
against them arising out of actions taken in furtherance of the Organization's duties under this
Declaration.
Following the Development Period, all such insurance coverage shall be written in the
name of the Organization as trustee for each of the Members. The Organization shall review the
adequacy of the Organization's insurance coverage at least annually. All policies shall include a
standard mortgagee's clause and shall provide that they may not be cancelled or substantially
modified without at least a ten (10) day prior written notice to any and all insured named therein,
including Owners and institutional first mortgages that have requested notice.
Section 8. Litigation. No judicial or administrative proceeding shall be commenced or
prosecuted by the Organization unless approved by at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the
Members. This Section shall not apply, however, to (i) actions brought by the Organization to
enforce the provisions of this Declaration (including, without limitation, the foreclosure of liens), (ii)
the imposition and collection of assessments as provided in Article F hereof, (iii) proceedings
involving challenges to ad valorem taxation, or (iv) counterclaims in proceedings instituted against
it. This Section shall not be amended unless such amendment is made by the Declarant pursuant
to Article H, Section 2, hereof, or is approved by the percentage votes, and pursuant to the same
procedures, necessary to institute proceedings as provided above. In addition, any claims against
Declarant require (a) a 75% vote of members and (b) written notice to Declarant with a 60 day
response time before filing.
Section 9. Covenants Running with the Land. The covenants, conditions, restrictions,
liens, easements, enjoyment rights, and other provisions contained herein are intended to and
shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all persons purchasing, leasing, subleasing or
otherwise occupying any portion of the Plat, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors,
grantees, and assigns. All instruments granting or conveying any interest in any Lot and all leases
or subleases shall refer to this Declaration and shall recite that it is subject to the terms hereof as
if fully set forth therein. However. all terms and provisions of this Declaration are binding upon all
successors in interest despite an absence of reference thereto in the instrument of conveyance,
lease, or sublease. The terms of all governing documents are subjoined herein and run with the
land to the greatest extent allowed under the law.
Section 10. Severability. Whenever possible, each provision of this Declaration shall be
interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid, but if the application of any provision of
this Declaration to any person or to any property shall be prohibited or held invalid, such
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 13
DRAFT
prohibition or invalidity shall not affect any other provision or the application of any provision which
can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and, to this end, the provisions of
this Declaration are declared to be severable,
Section 11, Attorneys Fees. In the event of a suit or action to enforce any provision of
this Declaration or to collect any money due hereunder or to foreclose a lien, the unsuccessful
party in such suit or action shall pay to the prevailing party all costs and expenses, including title
reports, and all attorneys fees that the prevailing party has incurred in connection with the suit or
action, in such amounts as the court may deem to be reasonable therein, and also including all
costs, expenses, and attorneys fees incurred in connection with any appeal from the decision of a
trial court or any appellate court.
Section 12. Organization Rights. The Organization may exercise any right or privilege
given to it expressly by state law, this Declaration, the governing documents, any use restriction or
rule or regulation, and every other right or privilege reasonably to be implied from the existence of
any law, right or privilege given to it therein or reasonably necessary to effectuate any such law,
right or privilege.
Section 13. Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law each officer and director
of this Organization shall be indemnified by the Organization from and on account of any liability
for acts or omissions occurring during the course of business or activities undertaken on behalf of
the Organization, including but not limited to any action, suit, or other proceeding (including
settlement of any suit or proceeding, if approved by its then Board) to which such officer or
director may be a party by reason of being or having been an officer or director. This
indemnification shall include indemnification against all costs and expenses, including attorneys'
fees, litigation costs, civil penalties, fines and other charges incurred incident thereto. This
indemnification shall not extend to any individual or joint willful misfeasance, malfeasance,
misconduct, or bad faith on the part of any officer or director, nor shall this indemnification extend
to any action by or on behalf of the Organization against a director in which action the director has
been adjudged guilty of any breach of duty toward the Organization. In addition, no officer or
director shall be personally liable to the Organization or any of its members for monetary damages
for any mistake of judgment, negligent conduct or other conduct as an officer or director; provided
that this provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of an officer or director for acts or
omissions that involve willful misfeasance, malfeasance, misconduct, bad faith, or intentional
misconduct by the officer or director or for any transaction from which the officer or director will
personally receive a benefit in money, property, or services to which the officer or director is not
legally entitled, To the extent that it is necessary for the officers or directors to implement this
indemnification, at the request of an officer or director, the officers or directors shall take such
action as is appropriate and allowable to implement this indemnification. The Organization may,
at the discretion of the board of the Organization, maintain adequate general liability and officers'
and directors' liability insurance to fund this obligation, if such coverage is reasonably available.
ARTICLE H
Amendment
Section 1. Amendment of Use Restrictions. Articles B, C, and D of this instrument which
relate to use of the Lots in the Subdivision may be amended and changed by the written consent
of the owners of the fee title (in the case title is subject to a recorded real estate contract, the
vendees under the recorded real estate contract shall be deemed to be owners of the fee title) of
not less than 60% of all Lots in all of the Subdivisions which have been made subject to the
provisions of this Declaration. For the purpose of amendment, consent to an amendment by a fee
owner shall be binding upon the owner and of any successors to the fee title for a period of six
months after it is given for the purpose of calculating the percentage required for adoption of the
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 14
DRAFT
consent. Consents required under this Section shall be delivered to the Community Organization
which shall tabulate them. Its determination of the sufficiency of the consent shall be conclusive,
and an amendment to Articles B, C and D shall be effective when a written Notice of Amendment
signed and acknowledged by the president and secretary of the Community Organization is
recorded in Snohomish County, Washington, stating that the requisite consent has been obtained
and setting forth the amendment in its entirety.
Section 2. Amendment by Declarant. This Declaration may be amended unilaterally at
any time and from time to time by Declarant during the Development Period (i) if such amendment
is necessary to bring any provision hereof into compliance with any applicable governmental
statute, rule, or regulation or judicial determination which shall be in conflict therewith; (ii) if such
amendment is necessary to enable any title insurance company to issue title insurance coverage
with respect to the Lots subject to this Declaration; (iii) if such amendment is required by an
institutional or governmental lender or purchaser of mortgage loans, including, for example, the
Federal National Mortgage Association or Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, to enable
such lender or purchaser to make or purchase Mortgage loans on the Lots subject to this
Declaration; or (iv) if such amendment is necessary to enable any governmental agency or private
insurance company to insure or guarantee Mortgage loans on the Lots subject to this Declaration;
provided, however, any such amendment shall not adversely affect the title to any owner's Lot
unless any such Lot owner shall consent thereto in writing. Further, so long as Declarant owns
any property for development and/or sale in the Community, Declarant may unilaterally amend
this Declaration for any other purpose; provided, however, any such amendment shall not
materially adversely affect the substantive rights of any Lot owners hereunder, nor shall it
adversely affect title to any Lot without the consent of the affected Lot owner.
Section 3. Declarant Consent. During the Development Period, all amendments shall
require the consent of the Declarant.
EXECUTED this XX day of XXXX,2014.
Maldiz Investments, LLC
By--:-----:-_~:--------
Zachary Lazo, Manager
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument,
on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the
Manager of Maldiz Investments, LLC to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses
and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
DATED: XXXX XX, 2011.
Notary Public ________ _
My appointment expires
CC&Rs. Talbot Road South 15
•
ALTA COMMITMENT l _ i~ TITLE INSURANCE
Commitment Number:
Issued By: 8. Fidelity National Title·
• Company
611066642
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration,
commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured
named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A,
upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of
Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies
committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company.
AllliabiJity and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the Effective Date or when
the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or
policies is not the fault of the Company.
The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request.
This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal
to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A
Countersigned By:
Authorized Officer or Agent
Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
I
Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
By:
Attest:
President
Secretary
RECEIVED
JAN 292014
CITY OF RENTON
PlANNING DIVISION
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13@01:38PM
WA-FT-FTMA-01530.610051·SPS-1-13-611066642
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE vuMPANY COMMITMENT NO 611066642
ISSUING OFFICE: FOR SETILEMENT INQUIRIES, CONTACT:
Title Officer: Terry Sarver
Fidelity National Title Company
3500 188th SI. SW, Suite 300
Lynnwood, WA 98037
Main Phone: (425)771-3031
Email: Unit2@inf,com
ORDER NO. 611066642
1, Effective Date: September 18, 2013 at 08:00AM
2, Policy or (Policies) to be issued:
a. ALTA Owner's Policy 2006
Proposed Insured: To be determined
Policy Amount: To Be Determined
Premium:
Tax:
Total:
b, ALTA Loan Policy 2006
SCHEDULE A
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
Proposed Insured: Appropriate Lender, its successors and/or assigns as their respective interests may appear,
Policy Amount: To Be Determined
Premium:
Tax:
Total:
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
To Be Determined
3, The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is:
Fee Simple
4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in land is at the Effective Date vested in:
Maldiz Investments, LLC, a limited liability company
Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. AMERICAN
LAND TITLE
A.SSOCIATlOIII
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13@ 01 :38PM
WA·FT·FTMA·01530.61 0051·SPS-1-13-611 066642
•
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE l. .... ,JlPANY COMMITMENT NO. 611066642
SCHEDULE A
(continued)
5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
For APN/ParceIID(s): 3023059071 07
THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., RECORDS
OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EAST OF TALBOT ROAD;
EXCEPT NORTHERLY 100 FEET AND THE EAST 218 FEET AND THAT PORTION LYING NORTH
AND WEST OF THE FOLLOWING LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF TALBOT ROAD WITH A LINE 30
FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION;
THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE, 435 FEET;
THENCE NORTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON
ABBREVIATED LEGAL:
PTN SE1/4 OF 30-23N-5E, W.M.
END OF SCHEDULE A
Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
AMER(CAN
LAND TITLE
ASSOCIATION
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13@01:38PM
WA-FT-FTMA-01530.61 OOS1-SPS-1-13-611 066642
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE "", • .JIPANY COMMITMENT NO. 611066642
SCHEDULE B
Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are
disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company:
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
A. Rights or claims of parties in possession, or claiming possession, not shown by the Public Records.
B. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be
disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land.
C. Easements, prescriptive rights, rights-of-way, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the
Public Records.
D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or
for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter fumished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the
Public Records.
E. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the Public
Records.
F. Any lien for service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity, or oonstruction or similar charges for
sewer, water, electricity, natural gas or other utilities, or for garbage collection and disposal not shown by the
Public Records.
G. Unpatented mining claims, and all rights relating thereto.
H. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof.
I. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes.
J. Water rights, claims or title to water.
K. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public
Records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires
of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.
Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. AMERICAN
lAND TITU
ASSOCIATION ,
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and AlTA members in good standing 85 of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13@ 01 :39PM
WA-FT-FTMA-01530.61 0051-SPS-1-13-611 066642
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE (,,~ •• 'PANY
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
1. Payment of the real estate excise tax, if required.
The Land is situated within the boundaries of the local taxing authority.
Present rate of real estate excise tax as of the date herein is 1.78%.
COMMITMENT NO. 611066642
Any conveyance document must be accompanied by the official Washington State Excise Tax Affidavit. The
applicable excise tax must be paid and the affidavit approved at the time of the recording of the conveyance
documents.
2. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half
delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties):
Year:
Tax Account No.:
Levy Code:
Assessed Value-Land:
Assessed Value-Improvements:
General and Special Taxes:
2013
302305-9071-07
2130
$185,000.00
$166,000.00
Billed:
Paid:
$5,003.72
$0.00
Unpaid: $5,003.72 (Plus penalties and interest)
Name: Tax Remittance -King County
To expedite payment of your taxes, you may mail the payment direct to:
King County Treasurer
500 4th Ave, Room 600
Seattle, WA 98104
3. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below,
Amount:
Dated:
Trustor/Grantor:
Trustee:
Beneficiary:
Loan No.:
Recording Date:
Recording No.:
$207,330.73
January 18, 2013
Maldiz Investment, LLC
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
Fairplay Funding
not disclosed
January 29, 2013
20130129001040
Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13@01:39PM
WA-FT-FTMA-O 1530.61 0051-$PS-1-13-611 066642
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE vvMPANY
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
COMMITMENT NO. 611066642
The Deed of Trust set forth above is purported to be a "Credit Line" Deed of Trust. It is a requirement that the
Trustor/Grantor of said Deed of Trust provide written authorization to close said credit line account to the Lender
when the Deed of Trust is being paid off through the Company or other Settlement/Escrow Agent or provide a
satisfactory subordination of this Deed of Trust to the proposed Deed of Trust to be recorded at closing.
4. Right of any party interested to sue or petition to have set aside, modified or contest a judicial or non-judicial
foreclosure or forfeiture, or any deed pursuant hereto, through which title to the Land is derived; and any liens,
encumbrances and/or ownership interests which may exist as a result of any acts or omissions of the foreclosing
parties, or as a result of such suit or petition.
The Company may be willing to remove this exception upon a conveyance to a bona fide purchaser for fair market
value. Please contact your title officer for further information.
5. Any rights to sue or petition to cancel, void or rescind the deed recorded under Recording No. 20130129001038 or
to recharacterize said deed as a security document in the event that it constituted a "distressed home conveyance"
as defined in RCW 61.34.020 or was a sale for less than fair market value.
The Company must be furnished a notarized affidavit by the grantor(s) in said deed confirming:
1. The grantor(s) or any party holding through said grantor(s) has surrendered
possession;
2. The grantor(s) has no further (a) rights of possession of the Land, (b) rights of
repurchase or redemption of title to the Land, and/or (c) rights to a share of the
proceeds from a future purchase or refinance of the Land; OR
If any of such rights exist, (a) they must be fully disclosed, (b) copies of documents creating those rights must be
submitted, and (c) the grantor(s) must consent to the proposed transaction to be insured; and
3. The sale resulting in said deed was not a "distressed home conveyance" as defined
in RCW 61.34.020, or, in the alternative, the sale was conducted in full compliance
with all of the provisions of RCW 61.34, with said deed being executed after the
expiration of the five (5) day right of cancellation.
Additionally, the Company must be provided with evidence of the fair market value of the Land.
All affidavits and documentation must be submitted to the Company prior to closing. The Company reserves the
right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested documentation.
Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and AlTA members in good standing as of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13 @ 01 :39PM
WA-FT -FTMA-01530.61 OOS1-SPS-1-13-611 066642
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE ""vMPANY
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
COMMITMENT NO. 611066642
6. The Company will require the following documents for review prior to the issuance of any title assurance
predicated upon a conveyance or encumbrance from the entity named below.
Limited Liability Company: Maldiz Investments, LLC
a. A copy of its operating agreement, if any, and any and all amendments, supplements and/or
modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member.
b. If a domestic Limited Liability Company, a copy of its Articles of Organization and all amendment thereto
with the appropriate filing stamps.
c. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete current list of members
certified by the appropriate manager or member.
d. If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence, satisfactory to the
Company that it was validly formed, is in good standing and authorized to do business in the state of
origin.
e. If less than all members, or managers, as appropriate, will be executing the closing documents, furnish
evidence of the authority of those signing.
The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the
requested documentation.
7. In the event that the Land is occupied or intended to be occupied by the owner and a spouse or registered
domestic partner as a homestead, the conveyance or encumbrance of the Land must be executed and
acknowledged by both spouses or both registered domestic partners, pursuant to RCW 6.13 which now provides
for an automatic homestead on such Land.
8. In the event matters are discovered during the closing process which would otherwise be insured by the Covered
Risks included in the policy, the Company may limit or delete insurance provided by the affected Covered Risk. In
such event, a supplemental will be issued prior to closing. General Exceptions A through K will not appear in the
ALTA Homeowner's Policy.
9. The Company is willing to issue an Extended Coverage Lenders Policy. General Exceptions A through K,
inclusive, are hereby deleted.
ALTA 22-06, ALTA 8.1 and ALTA 9-06 Endorsements will issue with the forthcoming lenders policy.
10. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
PURPOSE: INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES
AREA AFFECTED: SOUTH 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES
RECORDED: MAY 24,1966
RECORDING NUMBER: 6032653
,Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13@01:39PM
WA-FT -FTMA-01530.61 0051-SPS-1-13-611 066642
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE I~_ •• IPANY COMMITMENT NO. 611066642
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
11. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT
PURPOSE: SANITARY SEWER LINES
AREA AFFECTED: WESTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A
RECORDED DECEMBER 9,1997
RECORDING NUMBER: 9712091050
12. RELEASE OF DAMAGE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
BETWEEN: MAX L. FRAZIER
AND: KING COUNTY
RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 14, 1988
RECORDING NUMBER 8809140383
RELEASING KING COUNTY FROM ALL FUTURE CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM:
DIVERSION OF SURFACE AND STORM WATERS FROM SAID PREMISES
13. SEWER SPECIAL CONNECTION CHARGE #199, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS
THEREOF:
RECORDED: DECEMBER 11, 2000
RECORDING NUMBER: 20001211001717
END OF EXCEPTIONS
NOTES
The following matters will not be listed as Special Exceptions in Schedule B of the policy. There will be no coverage for
loss arising by reason of the matters listed below because these matters are either excepted or excluded from coverage or
are not matters covered under the insuring provisions of the policy.
,Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. AMERICAN --
LAND TlTH
.l.SSOClATlON
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13@ 01 :39PM
WA-FT -FTMA-O 1530.61 OOS1-SPS-1-13-611 066642
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE l,~ .• IPANY COMMITMENT NO. 611066642
Note A:
Note B:
Note C:
Note D:
Note E:
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
Effective Aug 1. 2013, Fidelity National Title Company offices in Pierce, King, Kitsap and Snohomish
Counties have a flat recording fee for residential sale and refinance transactions that involve an escrow.
Residential Sale Recording fee: $168.00
Residential Refinance Recording Fee $121.00
For Snohomish County, there is an additional $4.00 per document electronic recording processing fee.
RECORDING CHARGES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.
The RESPA Rule to Simplify and Improve the Process of Obtaining Mortgages and Reduce Consumer
Settlement Costs includes the provision for average charges, allowing settlement service providers to
establish an average recording fee. Divide the average charge between the buyer and seller as per
contract or local custom. The average charge is applied regardless of the number of documents
recorded in the transaction, the number of pages in each document or the actual recording charges. If
your transaction is not a residential loan or sale with a new loan, please contact your title provider for
actual recording charges.
The only conveyance(s) affecting said Land, which recorded within 24 months of the date of this report,
are as follows:
Grantor:
Grantee:
Recording Date:
Recording No.:
Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.
Maldiz Investments, LLC & Fairplay Funding NW LLC for security purposes only
January 29, 2013
20130129001038
Grantee: Fairplay Funding NW, LLC, d/b/a Fairplay Funding to release security interest only
as reflected in Trustee's Deed recorded prior hereto
Grantee: Maldiz Investments, LLC
Recorded: January 29, 2013
Recording No.: 20130129001039
The Public Records indicate that the address of the improvement located on said Land is as follows:
3340 Talbot Rd S
Renton, WA 98055
Examination of the Public Records discloses no judgments or other matters pending against the name
of the vested owner.
The name(s) of the proposed insured(s) furnished with this application for title insurance is/are:
No names were furnished with the application. Please provide the name(s) of the buyers as soon as
possible.
Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. AMERICAN
LAND TITLE
ASSOCIATION
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13@ 01 :39PM
WA-FT-FTMA-01530.61 OOS1-SPS-1-13-611 066642
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE v~,JlPANY COMMITMENT NO, 611066642
Note F:
Note G:
Note H:
Note I:
Note J:
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of an
authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the
insured lender, or by using Bancserv or other approved third-party service. If the above requirement
cannot be met, please call the Company at the number provided in this report.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Commitment, if the policy to be issued is other than an
ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17/06), or ALTA Loan Policy (6/17/06), the policy may not contain an arbitration
clause, or the terms of the arbitration clause may be different from those set forth in this Commitment.
If the policy does contain an arbitration clause and the Amount of Insurance is less than the amount, if
any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitral matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the
Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties.
As part of Fidelity National Title Company's commitment to the environment, we encourage the
paperless distribution of our products whenever possible. To help conserve natural resources, we will
automatically issue the forthcoming original policy(ies) electronically.
Please provide us with a current e-mail address for the new owner and/or lender prior to closing or by
emailingunit2@fnf.com. Hard copy versions may be issued upon request.
Fidelity National Title Co., 3500 188th St SW #300, Lynnwood, WA 98037
Cutoff time for recording release in King County is 2:00 PM, any release after 2:00 PM will record the
following day.
Cutoff time for recording release in Snohomish County is 1 :00 PM, any release after 1 :00 PM will record
the following day.
Covered Risks 16, 18, 19 and 21 contained in the ALTA Homeowner's Policy otTitle Insurance For a
One-to-Four Family Residence (2/3/10) include certain deductibles and maximum dollar limits to
coverage. The Covered Risks, the deductibles and our maximum dollar limit of liability are:
Your Deductible Amount:
Covered Risk 16: 1 % of Policy Amount, or $2,500 (whichever is less)
Covered Risk 18: 1 % of Policy Amount, or $5,000 (whichever is less)
Covered Risk 19: 1% of Policy Amount, or $5,000 (whichever is less)
Covered Risk 21: 1 % of Policy Amount, or $2,500 (whichever is less)
END OF NOTES
END OF SCHEDULE B
Our Maximum
Dollar Limit:
$10,000
$25,000
$25,000
$5,000
~opyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
AMERICAN
LAND TITlE
ASSOCIATION
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13 @01:39PM
WA-FT ·FTMA-01530.61 0051-SPS-1-13-611 066642
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE ' ___ .IPANY COMMITMENT NO_ 611066642
CONDITIONS
1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument.
2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or
interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge
to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the
extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the
Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the
Company at its option may amend Schedule 8 of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability
previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions.
3. liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of
Insured in the form of policy or pOlicies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply
with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule 8, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage
thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed
for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies
commITted for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as
expressly modified herein.
4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any
action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to
the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this
Commitment.
5. The poficy to be issued contains an arbitration clause, All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be
arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules
at httoiiwww.alta.ora.
END OF CONDITIONS
Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
i
AMERICAN
~
A~SOC1ATJON
The use of this Farm is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use.
All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
ALTA Commitment (Adopted: 06.17.2006) Printed: 09.26.13@01:39PM
WA·FT·FTMA-O 1530.61 0051-SPS-1-13-811 066642
e. Fidelity National Title·
• Company
Order No.:
Property:
I SELLER(S)
611066642-U2
3340 Talbot Rd S
Renton, WA 98055
I BUYERIBORROWER(S)
To be determined
LISTING AGENT
Caliber Real Estate
19125 North Creek Parkway Ste 123
Bothell, WA 98011
Phone:
Fax:
LENDER
Appropriate Lender
Phone:
Fax:
3500 188th st. SW, Suite 300
Lynnwood, WA 98037
Phone: (425)771-30311 Fax: (425)771-7910
Main Contact: Zachary Lazo
Phone: (425)320-3204
Cell: 2064940401
Fax: (866)696-0892
Email: ZackL@CaliberRe.com
Thank You for specifying Fidelity National Title Company
Your transaction is important to us.
Commitment Distribution Letter
WA0000896.doc f Updated: 04.22.13 Page 1 of 1
Printed: 09.26.13 @01:39PM by ar
-611066642
EXHIBIT A
Order No.: 611066642
For APN/ParcellD(s): 302305 9071 07
THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., RECORDS
OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EAST OF TALBOT ROAD;
EXCEPT NORTHERLY 100 FEET AND THE EAST 218 FEET AND THAT PORTION LYING NORTH
AND WEST OF THE FOLLOWING LINE:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF TALBOT ROAD WITH A LINE 30
FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION;
THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH LINE, 435 FEET;
THENCE NORTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON
ABBREVIATED LEGAL:
PTN SE1/4 OF 30-23N-5E, W.M.
RECORDING REQUIREMENTS
Effective January 1, 1997, document format and content requirements have been imposed by Washington Law.
Failure to comply with the following requirements may result in rejection of the document by the county recorder or
imposition of a $50,00 surcharge,
First page or cover sheet
3" top margin containing nothing except the return address,
1" side and bottom margins containing no markings or seals,
Title(s) of documents.
Recording no, of any assigned, released or referenced document(s),
Grantors names (and page no. where additional names can be found).
Grantees names (and page no. where additional names can be found),
Abbreviated legal description (Lot, Block, Plat Name or Section, Township, Range and Quarter, Quarter Section
for unplatted), Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description which must
also appear in the body of the document.
Assessor's tax parcel number(s),
Return address (in top 3" margin),
**A cover sheet can be attached containing the above format and data if the first page does not contain all
required data,
Additional Pages:
1" top, side and bottom margins containing no markings or seals,
All Pages:
No stapled or taped attachments, Each attachment must be a separate page, All notary and other pressure seals
must be smudged for visibility. Font size of 8 points or larger.
Recording Requirements
WA00000837.docl Updated: 05.14.10 Page 1 of 1
Printed: 09,26.13 @ 01 :39PM by ar
---611066642
PRIVACY STATEMENT
Effective Date: May 1, 2008
Order No.: 611066642-
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") respect the privacy and security of your non-public
personal information ("Personal Information") and protecting your Personal Information is one of our top priorities.
This Privacy Statement explains FNF's privacy practices, including how we use the Personal Information we
receive from you and from other specified sources, and to whom it may be disclosed. FNF follows the privacy
practices described in this Privacy Statement and, depending on the business performed, FNF companies may
share information as described herein.
PERSONAL INFORMATION COLLECTED
We may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:
• Information we receive from you on applications or other forms, such as your name, address, social security
number, tax identification number, asset information, and income information;
• Information we receive from you through our Internet websites, such as your name, address, email address,
Internet Protocol address, the website links you used to get to our websites, and your activity while using or
reviewing our websites;
• Information about your transactions with or services performed by us, our affiliates, or others, such as
information concerning your policy, premiums, payment history, information about your home or other real
property, information from lenders and other third parties involved in such transaction, account balances, and
credit card information; and
• Information we receive from consumer or other reporting agencies and publicly recorded documents.
DISCLOSURE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION
We may provide your Personal Information (excluding information we receive from consumer or other credit
reporting agencies) to various individuals and companies, as permitted by law, without obtaining your prior
authorization. Such laws do not allow consumers to restrict these disclosures. Disclosures may include, without
limitation, the following:
• To insurance agents, brokers, representatives, support organizations, or others to provide you with services
you have requested, and to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation,
or nondisclosure in connection with an insurance transaction;
• To third-party contractors or service providers for the purpose of determining your eligibility for an insurance
benefit or payment and/or providing you with services you have requested;
• To an insurance regulatory authority, or a law enforcement or other governmental authority, in a civil action, in
connection with a subpoena or a governmental investigation;
• To companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or to other financial institutions with which we
have joint marketing agreements and/or
• To lenders, lien holders, judgment creditors, or other parties claiming an encumbrance or an interest in title
whose claim or interest must be determined, settled, paid or released prior to a title or escrow closing.
Privacy Statement
SSCORPD0911.doc I Updated: 11.03,09 Page1of2
Printed: 09.26.13 @ 01 :39PM by ar
.. ·-611066642
PRIVACY STATEMENT
Effective Date: May 1, 2008
(continued)
We may also disclose your Personal Information to others when we believe, in good faith, that such disclosure is
reasonably necessary to comply with the law or to protect the safety of our customers, employees, or property
and/or to comply with a judicial proceeding, court order or legal process.
Disclosure to Affiliated Companies:
We are permitted by law to share your name, address and facts about your transaction with other FNF
companies, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate service providers to provide you with
services you have requested, for marketing or product development research, or to market products or
services to you. We do not, however, disclose information we collect from consumer or credit reporting
agencies with our affiliates or others without your consent, in conformity with applicable law, unless such
disclosure is otherwise permitted by law.
Disclosure to Nonaffiliated Third Parties:
We do not disclose Personal Information about our customers or former customers to nonaffiliated third
parties, exoept as outlined herein or as otherwise permitted by law.
CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY OF PERSONAL INFORMATION
We restrict access to Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information to
provide products or servioes to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with
federal regulations to guard Personal Information.
ACCESS TO PERSONAL INFORMATION I REQUESTS FOR CORRECTION, AMENDMENT, OR DELETION
OF PERSONAL INFORMATION
As required by applicable law, we will afford you the right to access your Personal Information, under certain
circumstances to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed, and request correction or
deletion of your Personal Information. However, FNF's current policy is to maintain customers' Personal
Information for no less than your state's required reoord retention requirements for the purpose of handling future
coverage claims.
For your protection, all requests made under this section must be in writing and must include your notarized
signature to establish your identity. Where permitted by law, we may charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs
incurred in responding to such requests. Please send requests to:
Chief Privacy Officer
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
601 Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, FL 32204
CHANGES TO THIS PRIVACY STATEMENT
This Privacy Statement may be amended from time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws. When we
amend this Privacy Statement, we will post a notice of such changes on our website. The effective date of this
Privacy Statement, as stated above, indicates the last time this Privacy Statement was revised or materially
changed.
Privacy Statement
SSCORPD0911.docl Updated: 11.03.09 Page 2 of2
Printed: 09.26.13 @01:39PMbyar
~···611 066642
To be determined
3340 Talbot Rd S
Renton, WA 98055
Cover Page (1.25x2.5 Env)
S$CORPD2056.doc I Updated: 11.28.11
Printed: 09.26.13@ 01 :39PM by ar
----611066642
, '
AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO:
William Widmer
Fairplay Funding NW, LLC.
dIbIa Fairplay Funding
5260 Carillon Point
Kirkland, W A 98033
LPlld-I'1 4 t(
FIDELITY NATIONAL rITLE
Granlor(s): Maldiz Investments. LLC
FUTURE ADVANCE PROVISIONS
GranleeCs): Fairplay Fundin. NW. LLC. d/b/a Fairplay Fundin.
Abbreviated Legal Description: Portion of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 05 East, W.M.
Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s}: 3023059071
DEED OF TRUST
THIS DEED OF TRUST is made this January 18.2013, by and among Maldi, Investments. LLC
GRANTOR(S). whose street address is 1509 N 80th Street. Seattle, W A 98103, Fidelity National Title
, TRUSTEE, whose street address is 11201 88th Avenue E, Puyallup, WA 98373, and Fairplay
Funding NW, LLC., a WA limited liability company, dIbIa Fairplay Funding, BENEFICIARY, whose
street address is 5260 Carillon Point, Kirkland, WA 98033.
WITNESSETH: Grantor(s) hereby bargain(s), sell(s), and convey(s) to Trustee in trust, with power
of sale, the following described real property in King County, WA:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
The Easl half of Ihe North half of the South naif of the North half of the Southeast quarter of Seclion
30.lownship 23 North. Range 5 East. W.M .• in King County, Washington. lying East of Talbot Road; except
Northerly 100 feet and East 218 feel and that portion tying North and West ofthe following line: Beginning al
the intersection of the East line of Talbot Road with a line 30 feet North of the South line of said subdivision:
thence Easl parallel with said South line. 435 feet; thence North 10 the North line of said Subdivision. Situate
in the City of Renton. County of King. State of Washington.
Commonly known as:
3340 Talbot Rd S
Renton, WA 98055
"This document rued for record by
Fidelity National Tille Insurance ., aD
... ommodallon only. It h.1 Dol been
... mlned II toll. orr .. 1 upon Ih. Hlle."
which real property is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes, togelher with all the
tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances now or hereafter belonging or in any way appertaining.
to the foregoing described real property (collectively, UReal Property").
TOGETHER WITH all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to all goods, building and other
materials, supplies, work in process, equipment, machineryt fixtures, furniture, furnishings. signs and
other personal property, wherever situated, which are or are to be incorporated into, used in connection
DEED OF TRUST ]0[8
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001040 Page 1 of8 Created By: Amanda Rockey Printed: 9/26/2013 1:33:47 PM PST
p ., ,
with, or appropriated for use on the Real Property together with all inventory, accounts, cash receipts,
deposit accounts, accounts receivable, contract rights, licenses, agreements, general intangibles, chattel
paper, instruments, documents, notes, drafts, letter$ of credit, insurance policies, insurance and
condemnation awards and proceeds, leases, any other rights to the payment of money, trade names,
trademark, and service marks arising from or related to the ownership, management, leasing or
operation of the Real Property or any business now or hereafter conducted thereon by Grantor; all
applications, plans, surveys, studies, reports and similar materials or agreements in Grantor's
possession that are related to the Real Property or its development; all pennits consents, approvals,
licenses, authorizations and other rights granted by, given by or obtained from, any governmental
entity with respect to the Real Property; all deposits or other security now or hereafter made with or
given to utility companies by Grantor with respect to the Real Property; all advance payments of
insurance premiums made by Grantor with respect to the Real Property; all reserves, deferred
payments, deposits, accounts, refunds, cost savings and payments of any kind related to the Real
Property or any portion thereof; together with all replacements and proceeds of, and additions and
accessions to, any of the foregoing; together with all books, records and files relating to any of the
foregoing.
The Real Property and all other property described above are sometimes hereinafter referred to
collectively as the "CollateraL"
To the extent any element or portions Qf the Collateral constitutes personal property, Grantor, as
debtor, grants to Beneficiary, as secured party, a security interest therein and any products or proceeds
thereof, pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code of Washington (the "UCC") on the terms and
conditions contained herein except tbat where any provision of this Deed of Trust is in conflict with
tbe UCC, the UCC shall control. Beneficiary hereby assigns such security interest to Trustee, in trus~
for the benefit of Beneficiary to be dealt with as a portion of the Collateral pursuant to tbis Deed of
Trust except as otherwise specified herein. At the request of Beneficiary, Grantor shall execute and
deliver for liIiog UCC-I financing statements and such other documents as Beneficiary may
reasonably require to perfect its security interest.
As to all of the above described personal property which is or which hereafter becomes a "fixture"
under applicable law, this Deed ofTrust constitutes a fixture filing under RCW 62A.9-313 and 62A.9-
402(b), as amended or recodified from time to time.
THIS DEED IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SECURING THE FOLLOWING:
(a) Payment of the sum ofTWO HUNDRED SEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED
THIRTY DOLLARS AND SEVENTY-TWO CENTS ($207J30.731 with interest thereon, according
to the terms of that certain promissory note of even date herewith, payable to Beneficiary and made by
Grantor (the "Note," which shall also include all renewals, modifications or extensions thereof).
(b) Payment of any further sums advanced or loaned by Beneficiary to Grantor, or any of
its successors or assigns, if (1) the Note or ()thcr writing evidencing the future advance or loan
specifically states that it is secured by this Deed of Trust or (2) the advance, including costs and
expenses incurred by Beneficiary, is made pursuant to this Deed of Trust or any other documents
executed by Grantor evidencing, securing or relating to the Note andlor the Collateral, whether
DEED OF TRUST 20f8
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001040 Page 2 of 8 Created By: Amanda Rockey Printed: 9/26/2013 1:33:47 PM PST
r '. "
executed prior to, contemporaneously with or subsequent to this Deed of Trust (this Deed of Trust, the
Note, The Environmental and Hazardous Substances Indemnity Agreement and such other documents,
including any construction or other loan agreement, are hereafter collectively referred to as the "Loan
Documents") together with interest thereon at the rate set forth in the Note unless otherwise specified
in the Loan Documents or agreed to in writing.
(c) Performance of each agreement, term and condition set forth or incorporated by
reference in the Loan Documents unless perfonmance of such agreement, term or condition is
specifically provided to not be secured by this Deed of Trust
NOTWithstanding the foregoing and the covenants hereafter set forth, it is expressly agreed and
acknowledged that none of the covenants, representations, or other obligations of Grantor set forth in
this Deed of Trust are intended by Grantor and Beneficiary to secure or be the substantial equivalent of
obligations of Grantor arising under any the Hazardous Substance Indemnity or other environmental
indemnity agreement or provision, including without limitation any agreement or provision pertaining
to hazardous or toxic wastes or substances, and any reference hereafter to the Loan Documents shall
not include any such environmental indemnity agreement or provision included therein.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES: Grantor(s) represents and warrants as follows:
I. Grantor has full power and authority to grant the Collateral to Trustee and warrants the
Collateral to be free and clear of all liens, charges, and other encumbrances except for malters of
record on the date hereof.
2. None of the Collateral is used principally or at all for agricultural or farming purposes.
3. The Collateral is free from damage and no matter has come to Grantor's attenrion (including,
but not limited to, knowledge of nny construction defects or nonconforming work) that would
materially impair the value of the Real Property as security.
4. The Note secured by this Deed of Trust is primarily for commercial, industrial or business
purposes and is not primarily for personal, family Or household purposes.
COVENANTS: Grantor(s) covenant(s) and agree(s) as follows:
I. To keep the Collateral in good condition and repair; to permit no waste of the Collateral; to
complete any building, structure, or improvement being built or about to be built on the Collateral; to
restore promptly any building, structure, or improvement on the Collateral which may be damaged or
destroyed; and to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants. conditions, and restrictions
affecting the ColI.ter.1.
2. To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and assessments upon the Collateral; to keep the
Collatcral free and clear of all other charges, Iicns, or encumbrances impairing the security of this
Deed ofTrust;
DEED OF TRUST 30r8
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001040 Page 3 ofB Created By: Amanda Rockey Printed: 9/26/2013 1:33:47 PM PST
I " '.
3. To keep all buildings now or hereafter erected on the Collateral continuously insured against
loss by fire or other hazards in an amount not less than the total debt secured by this Deed of Trust.
All policies shall be held by the Beneficiary, and be in such companies as the Beneficiary may
approve and have loss payable first to the Beneficiary, as ils interest may appear, and then to the
Grantor(s). The amount collected under any insurance policy may be applied upon any indebtedness
secured by this Deed of Trust in such order as the Beneficiary shall determine. Such application by
the Beneficiary shall not cause discontinuance of any proceedings to foreclose this Deed of Trust In
the event of foreclosure, all rights of the Grantor(s) in insurance polici ... then in force shall pass to the
purchaser at the foreclosure sale.
4. To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or
powers of Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including cost of title search and
attorney's fees in a reasonable amount, in any such action or proceeding, and in any suit brought by
Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of Trust
5. To pay all costs, fees, and expenses in connection with this Deed of Trust, including the
expenses of the Trustee incurred in enforcing the obligation secured by this Deed of Trust and
Trustee's and attorney's fees actually incurred, as provided by statute.
6. That, in the event Grantor(s) fails to pay when due any taxes, assessments, insurance
premiums, liens, encumbrances, or other charges against the Collateral, Beneficiary may pay the same,
and the amount so paid, with interest at the rate set forth in the note secured by this Deed of Trust,
shall be added to and become a part of the debt secured in this Deed of Trust.
7. The Collateral may not be sold (by conveyance, contract to sell or otherwise), assigned,
transferred or encumbered without the Beneficiary's consent; upon breach of this provision, in
addition to any other remedies provided in the Note or Loan Documents, Beneficiary may declare all
sums due under the Note and this Deed of Trust immediately due and payable, unless prohibited by
applicable law.
8. In the event any portion of the Collateral is taken or damaged in an eminent domain
proceeding, the entire amount of the award or such portion as may be necessary to fully satisfy the
obligation secured by this Deed ofTrust shall be paid to Beneficiary to be applied to said obligation.
9. By accepting payment of any sum secured by this Deed of Trust after its due date, Beneficiary
does not waive its right to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare
default for failure to so pay.
10. The Trustee shall reconvey all or any part of the Collateral covered by this Deed of Trust to
the person entitled thereto, on written request of the Grantor(s) and the Beneficiary, or upon
satisfaction of the obligation secured and written request for reconveyance made by the Beneficiary or
the person entitled thereto.
I L Upon default by Grantor(s) in the payment of any indebtedness secured by this Deed ofTrust
or in the performance of any agreement contained in this Deed of Trust, all sums secured by this Deed
of Trust shall immediately become due and payable at the option of the Beneficiary. In such event and
DEED OF TRUST 40f8
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed forvariations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001040 Page 4 of 8 Created By: Amanda Rockey Printed: 9/26/2013 1:33:47 PM PST
~ .. '.
upon written request of Beneficiary, Trustee shall sell the trust property, in accordance with the Deed
of Trust Act of the State of Washington.
12. Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser at the sale its deed, without warranty, which shall convey
to the purchaser .11 right, title and interest in the real and personal propeny which Grantor(s) had or
had the power to convey.t the time of the execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as Grantor(s) may
have acquired thereafter. Trustee's deed shall recite the facts showing that the sale was conducted in
compliance with all the requirements of law and of this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima
facie evidence of such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof in favor of bona fide purchaser and
encumbrancers for value.
13. The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Oeed of Trust Act of the State of
Washington is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Oced of Trust to be foreclosed as
a mortgage.
14. In the event of the absence, death, incapacity, disability, or resignation of Trustee, or at the
discretion of the Beneficiary, Beneficiary may appoint in writing a successor trustee, and upon the
recording of such appointment in the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is
recorded, the successor trustee shall be vested with aU powers of the original trustee. The trustee is
not obligated to notify any pany hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of an action
or proceeding in which Grantor(s), Trustee, or Beneficiary shall be a party.
IS. This Deed of Trust applies to, inures to the benefit of, and is binding not only on the parties
hereto, but on hislher/their heirs, devLsees t legatees, administrators, executors, and assigns. The term
Beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner of the note secured hereby, whether or not named as
Beneficiary herein.
16. This Deed of Trust shall be deemed a security agreement, as defined in the Uniform
Commercial Code as adopted and amended by the State of Washington. The remedies for any
violation of tbe covenants, terms and conditions of the agreements contained herein shall be as
prescribed (i) herein, or (ii) by general law, or (iii) by the specific statutory consequences now or
hereafter enacted, and specified in the Uniform Commercial Code as enacted by the State of
Washington, all at Beneficiary's sole election. Grantor and Beneficiary agree that the filing of any
financing statement in the records normally having to do with personal propeny shall not be construed
as impairing the hereby stated intention of the parties that everything used in connection with the
construction, management, maintenance and production of income from the Collateral together with
aU other rights and propeny described berein and comprising tbe secured property shall at all times
and for all purposes in all proceedings, both legal and equitable, be regarded as part of the Collateral,
whether physicaUy attached or specifically identified or not.
17. As further security for the payment of all indebtedness and performance of all obligations
secured hereby, Grantor irrevocably and absolutely assigns to Beneficiary, the rents, issues, profits and
proceeds of contracts of thc Collateral, together with all futurc leascs, profits and contracts, and any
and all extensions, renewals and replacements hereof. However, as long as no default shall exist in any
obligation secured hereby, Grantor may collect assigned rents and profits as the same shall fall due.
All rents or profits receivable from or in respect to the Collateral which Grantor shall be permitted to
DEED OF TRUST 50f8
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001040 Page 5 of 8 Created By: Amanda Rockey Printed: 9/26/2013 1:33:47 PM PST
" I " •
collect hereunder shall be received by il in lrusl to pay the usual and reasonable operaling expenses of,
and the taxes upon, the Collaleral and the payment of all sums secured hereby, Upon the occurrence of
any default in payment of any indebtedness or performance of any obligation secured hereby, all rights
of the Grantor to collect and receive rents and profils shall wholly and immedialely terminate without
notice, and Beneficiary shall thereafter have the absolute righl to all such rents and profits, In addition
to, and not in limitation of the foregoing, Beneficiary shall have the righl to petition Ihe Court of
appropriate jurisdiction for the appointment of a Receiver of the rents, issues and profits of the
Collateral and shall have in addition to the rights and powers customarily given to and exercised by
such receiver, the right to enter upon and take possession of the Collateral and manage the same with
all rights and oplions in regard thereto available to Grantor, Grantor expressly waives the posting of
bond by such receiver, and waives any challenge to a proposed receiver based on affilialion wilh
Beneficial)',
18. In the event of the dealh, incapacity, disability or resignation of Trustee, Beneficial)' may
appoint in writing a successor trustee, and upon the recording of such appojntment in the mortgage
records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is recorded, the successor trustee shall be vested
wilh all powers of the original trustee. The Trustee is nol obligaled to notify any party hereto of
pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of any action or proceeding in which Grantor, Trustee
or Beneficial)' shall be a party unless such action or proceeding is broughl by the Trustee.
19, {USE ONLY IF BORROWER IS A NON·NATURAL PERSON]. Grantor will not cause or
permit any change of more than 50% of Ihe beneficial ownership or voting interest in Grantor, or agree
to do any of the foregoing, without first repaying the Note in full,
ORAL AGREEMENTS OR ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, EXTEND
CREDIT, OR TO FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT ARE NOT
ENFORCEABLE UNDER WASHINGTON LAW.
DEED OF TRUST 60f8
This map does not purport to show aU highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001040 Page 6 of 8 Created By: Amanda Rockey Printed: 9/26/2013 1:33:47 PM PST
. " . .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Deed of Trust has been executed as of the day and yea, first above
written,
GRANTOR:
9z/
[sign name] [sign name]
[print name] [print name]
[title]
[date]
--=---=:3--_l·ss
On this JS day of . } IJI , 2013, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
anb for. the State of W A, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared
(AVI d Jtl./ b4:s ~ , known to me to be the )nM't#'~ t"'b!1><Rritle) of
mtHdri, "1~ame), that executed the foregoing instrumenCmd acknowledged
the said instrument to be hislhe, free and voluntary act and deed, for the PUlposes therein mentioned.
! certilY that I know· or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and
making this acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document.
s~4
dllll-JV1. W1t1r(J1
Print Name
NOTARY PUllL/C in and for the State ofWA
residing at I~" Y>1 gl'l... .
My commission expires ;1/46:r .
j
DEED OF TRUST 70f8
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001040 Page 7 of 8 Created By: Amanda Rockey Printed: 9/26/2013 1:33:47 PM PST
· .' .
REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE
Do not record. To be used only when note has been paid.
TO: TRUSTEE
The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of the note and all other indebtedness secured by the
within Deed of Trust. Said Note, together with an other indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust,
has been fully paid and satisfied; and you are hereby requested and directed, on payment to you of any
sums owing to you under the terms of said Deed or Trust, to cancel said note above mentioned, and all
other evidences of indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you herewith, together with
the said Deed of Trust, and to reconvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of said
Deed of Trust, all the estate now held by you thereunder.
Oated:; _________ _
DEED OF TRUST 80f8
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001040 Page 8 of 8 Created By: Amanda Rockey Printed: 9/26/2013 1:33:47 PM PST
After Recording Return To:
Fairplay Funding NW LLC
5260 Carillon Point
Kirkland, WA 98033
E2586654
01/29/201311:53 KING COUNTY, WR
TRX $10.00
SRLE $0.09 PAGE-001 OF 901
File No.: 7236.23113/Atwal, Sukhwinder and 6alwinder VI ,cJ..Iq<ll/ 2.{1<f-ttO
Trustee's Deed FIDELITY NATIONAL rITLE
The GRANTOR, Northwest Trustee Services, Inc., as present Trustee under that Deed of Trust
(defined below), in consideration of the premises and payment recited below, he!eby grants and conveys,
without representation or warranty, expressed or implied, to Maldiz Investments, LLC & Fairplay Funding NW
LLC for security purposes only, as GRANTEE, all real property (the Property), situated in the County of King,
State of Washington, described as follows:
Tax Parcel No.: 3023059071
The East half of the North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of Section
3D, township 23 North, Range 5 Easl, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying East of Talbot Road; except
Northerly 100 feel and East 218 feet and that portion lying North end West of the following line: Beginning at
the intersection of the East 6ne of Talbot Road with a line 30 feel North althe South line of said subdivision;
thence East parallel with said South line, 435 feet; thence North to the North line of said Subdivision. S~uate
in the C~ of Renton, County of King, State of Washington.
RECITALS:
1. This conveyance is made pursuant to the powers, including the power of sale, conferred upon the
Grantee by that certain Deed of Trust between Sukhwinder Atwal, and Balwinder Atwal, Husband and Wife,
as Grantor, to lS Title of Washington, as Trustee, and Mortgage Electronic Registralion Systems, Inc. as
nominee for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. its successors and assigns, Beneficiary, dated 12108/05,
recorded 12116/05, under Audito~sIRecorde~s No, 20051216000362 and ,..recorded on 31112010 under
Audito~s file no. 20100301000748, records of King County, Washington and subsequently assigned 10 U.S.
Bank National Association, as trustee, on behalf olthe holders of the HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-
1 Mortgage loan Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-1 under King County AuditorslRecorders No.
20120621001254.
2. The Deed of Trust was executed to secure, together with other undertakings, the payment of one
or more promissory nate(s) ("Note") in the sum of $525,000.00 with interest therson, acwrding to the terms
thereof, in favor of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. as nominee for Countrywide Home Loans.
Inc. its successors and assigns and to secure any other sums of money which might become due and
payable under Ihe terms of said Deed of Trust.
3. The Deed of Trusl provided that the Property is nol used principally for agricultural or farming
purposes and the Grantor has no adual knowiedge that the Property is used principally for agricultural or
farming purposes.
4. Default having occurred in the obligations secured andlor covenants of the Deed of Trust grantor.
as setforth In Notice ofTrustee's Sale described below, which by the lerms of the Deed ofTrust make
operative the power to sell, the thirty-day advance Notice of Default was transmlUed to the Deed of Trust
grantor, or his successor in interest, and a copy of said Notice was posted or served In accordance with law.
5. U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, on behalf oflhe holders olthe HarborView Mortgage
loan Trust 2006-1 Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-1, being then the holder of the
indebtedness secured by the Deed of Trust. delivered to said Grantor a wriuen request direc6ng Grantor to
sell the Property in accordance with law and the terms of the Deed of Trust.
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no !lability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001038 Page 1 012 Created By: david.sinding Printed: 9/26/2013 1:36:23 PM PST
6. The defaulls specified in the "Notice of Default' nol having been cured, the Grantor, in
compliance with the terms of the Deed oITrust, executed and on 09/19/12, recorded in the office of the
Auditor of King County, Washington, •• Notice of Trustee's Sale' of the Property under Auditor's File No.
20120919000990.
7. The Grantor, in the "Notice oITrustee's Sale". fixed the place of sale as The northwest comer of
the ground level parking area located under the Pacific Corporate Center building. 13555 SE 36th Street, City
of Bellevue, State of Washington a public place. at 10:00 o'clock a.m., and in accordance with the law caused
copies of the statutory "Notice of Trustee's Sale' to be transmitted by mail to all persons entitled thereto and
either posted or served prior to 90 days before the sale; lurther, the Grantor caused a copy of said "No~ce 01
Trustee's Sale" to be published in a legal newspaper in each county in which the property or any part thereof
is situated, once between the thirty-fifth and twenty,eighth day belore the date of sale, and once between the
fourteenth and the seventh day before the date of sale; and further, included with the Notice, which was
transmitted to or served upon the Deed of Trust grantor or his successor in interest, 8 "Notice of Foreclosure n
in substantially the statutory form. to which copies of the Note and Deed of Trust were attached.
8. During foreclosure, no action by the Beneficiary. its successors or assigns was pending on an
obligation secured by the Deed of Trust.
9. All legal requirements and all provisions of said Deed oITrust have been complied with, as to
acts to be performed and notices to be given. as provided in chapter 61.24 RCW.
10. The defaults specified in the "Notice oITrustee's Sale" not having been cured ten days prior to
the date of Trustee's Sale and said obligation secured by said Deed of Trust remaining unpaid, on January
16. 20t3, the data 01 sale, which was not less than 190 days from the date of defauft in the obligation
secured, the Grantor then and there sold the Property at public auction to said Grantee. the highest bidder
therefore, for the sum of $235,286.43 cash.
This conveyance is made without representations or warranties of any kind, expressed or implied. By
recording this Trustee's Deed, Grantee understands, acknov.1edges and agrees that the Property was purchased
in the context of a foreclosure, that the trustee made no representations to Grantee concerning the Property and
that the trustee owed no duty to make disclosures to Grantee concerning the Property, Grantee relying solely
upon hislh<:rRheirfrts own due diligence investigation before electing to bid for the Property.
DATED: January 24, 2013
~1Z"'-'""
Atan ~ AssiStlinice President
State 01 Washington
County of King
I Gabriel Moore, Notary certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Alan Burton is the
person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument, on
oath stated that (he/she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged (he/she) as the
Assistant Vice President of Northwest Trustee Services tnc. to be the free and voluntary act of such party for
the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Datc:<l: January 24, 2013
GABRIEL MOORE
STATE OF WASHINGTON
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMiSSION EXPIRES
03-Ga·16
A Y VBLIe in and for Ihe Stale of
Washington. residing at King Co.
My commission expires: 03/08120 16
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001038 Page 2 of 2 Created By: david.sinding Printed: 9/26/2013 1:36:23 PM PST
AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO:
Name Fairplay Funding NW. LLC .. d/b/a Fairplay Funding
Address 5260 Carillon Point
City. Stale. Zip Kirkland, WA 98033
Filed fot Record at Request of:
Fairplay Funding NW, LLC., dIbI. Fairplay Funding
QUIT CLAIM DEED VII d-J Cj L! II 2.hL!
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
THE ORA NTOR(S) __ .!Fi!a!!irl!!pl!l!aYl::.£!Fu",nl!ld!!!in!l! • .!N"W~, L",L"C", . .!!dIbI~'!lF:.!.!!!irl1pl!l!alCY C.F!!Junlld!!!in!!lg'-_________ _
for and in consideralion of (0 release security interest only as reflected in Trustee's Deed recorded prior hereto
conveys and quit claims to ___ .JM!!!!l!al!l!d!!liz!JI!!!nYYlesO!tm!!!!!e:!ln!lilS.JL6!L"C~ ______________ _
the following described real estate, situated in the County of King
S .. te ofWA:
Legal Description;
The East h~lf of the North half of the South half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of Seclion
30, township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M" in King County, Washington, lying East of Talbot Road; except
Northe~y 100 feet and East 218 feet and that portion lying North and West of the following line: Beginning at
the intersection of the East line of Talbot Road with a line 30 feet North of the South line of said subdivision:
thence ea.1 parallel with said South line, 435 feet; thence North to the North line of said Subdivision. Situate
in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington.
Commonly known as: 3340 Talbot Rd S Renton WA 98QSS King County, WA
This Quia Claim Deed is not intended to release or reconvey the beneficial interest in favor of Grantor in any Deed
of Trust or other security instrument recorded subsequent hereto.
Assessor's Property Tax ParceVAccount Number: 302305907t
Dated '/Mf :>
BY_~ lV~ __ _ By ______________________ _
Fairplay Funding NW, LLC" dIbIaJ Fairplay Funding
LPB·12(c) 7/97
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and Location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001039 Page 1 of 2 Created By: davld,sinding Printed: 9/26/2013 1:36:34 PM PST
f
STATE OF WA
COUNTY OF King
1 certify Ihat I know or have 5atisfaclOty evidence that William Widmer is the petSOn(s) who appcllJ"Cd beron: me, IU'ld said
PCl'Jon(s) acknowledged that he signed this instrument. on ooth stated that he is authorized to ex«ute the instrument and IIcknowiedged it 1$
the Authorized Signer Fairplay Funding. NW. LtC., dIbIa Fairplay Funding 10 be the free and voluntary 3(t of suth puty(ies) for the uscs
,nd
purposes mentioned in 1his instrument.
D''''':_-I-I-lI-z.......,S''--.,./I3 ..... _____ _
I
This map does not purport to show all highways roads or easements affecting said property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location
Order: 611066642 Doc: KC:2013 20130129001039 Page 20f2 Created By: david,sinding Printed: 9/26/2013 1:36:34 PM PST
0-27 W
2.69 AC
0)[2
9.85 129.S5
~ 7904189014
0.24 ~
w: ,... PCL2 137 ~20 ~
20.0€ --",",,'"'.'--------.'
-
O.6~ ~,r;
0078
1.32 M:.
9042
.~ ~zoo .D9 Ae mS
( ",,~-51 '" 115 +/_
15111 SF
-17 !:J 175 +1_ 9047
165 +/_
1.0 At;
0J31 1. 7S
9071 1.16 AC
0021 ~
~
~ m .-________________________ .• ___ . _________________ .,.. _________ . _______ JL ______ .. __ ~'~'~, ________ ._
t 302305 .. ~
.". KC 7803311125 SP 1177127
"~
LOT 1
e-
+~ LOT2
0.60 AC ~i: AC F 16 .", __ ~90:4:1_J;_----------'--------.---'-----------------1 ;~~. mo,,.. ~_llO :; k-J'~O_L_O~t;1..0..J:....4
3.13 AC
9021
,~ . ..
TRAC Open
S.A
1-------
REAL ESTATE CONTRAcr
71t1SCONTRACT,~atJdtllt#ndlttlO\thb 11th I1I)'DI Aprll.1966
>.
"',-" PAUL V. WBllN1!R lind KU.lWl!T WBRlfK1I., hh vUe
H.
btft\n3rttr t'&11rd tbe "~Iln." ud mO:lAS/lIlLLElt /Uld AJJ:CB II1L1.1!1I., his vif.
~,
\\o1TNESS&TJt: Thai tlIc tenet ,llfft:l II) Itn ttl tbe purd!aJer aDd 1M pun:1wer .1{tC'tt ID pWclaM froID tb, ttl'ln Ibe follo"lnll:
dntt~ rral e,Ult, "lib tht appurtmlllCtt. In K1ns COlln!1. StUI' or Wl.lhlnJ1(1n:
In Section 30, To~hip 23, Ransa 5 Eaet 216 faDt of the ~orth ~ of the South ~ of the
No~th % of the SE~ lese North 100 feet, TOG!THZa with an .element for lngteaa and egress
and utilities to Springb~ook road Over the Southerly 30 feet of property descrlbed as:
That portion of the North % of the South. % of the North .I.t of the Southeast k of Sectlon 30,
Township 23 North Range 5 Eas.t W.M. .. lying !aat of th~ Kent-Rentcn Road (County Road No. 80)
EXCEPT tbe northerly 100 feet thereof and EXCEn tlut portion lylns North and WeB t of the
following deact:lbcd l!.ue: 8eginning at tho intet'aection of the Eut line of Kent .. !lenton
ROBd with a line 30 feet North of th~ South line of ,aid subdivision; tbenee East,
pn~aLlel with Q SAid South line 435 feet~ thence Harth to the Horth line of soid
aubdi¥i6ion; situate in the COUDty of King, State of Wuhl,ngton.* (lee below)
The terms and ~tIdILlolIJ of Lbt. (tIotncllJ"11" fOUOWIl 'The pu~ prSce b Four Thousand FLve Hundred and
no/100 ......... ~ ••• -..... -.... -....... -_ ............. _ ... __ .......... ___ ... __ .. __ (I 4,500.00 ) Dalbn, of which
One Thousand and' no/lOa .............. -.. .: ........... -.. --.. --..................... (f l,OOO.OO l nallushave
~~n pUl. the ttetIpt. .. bertor 1I1imb7 ad:.DQ.1II'Icda:td. arad lba bdaDtG 01 uld purdluo swJ.:t IhaIl be I?*Id u faUow.:
One Uundred and no/100 _ ......... _-...... __ .......... -.............. __ ............ _-_ .. ($ 100.00 ) Dollan.
CI' mo~ at P'lrchoueT" optiOllt on vt bdOR" Ur.e 1:5th da), 101 H.y • 100 66.
lnd One Hundred and no/100 .......... -. ___ ......... __ ..... _ .... __ .. ___ ...... _ .. ('100.00 • Dl)llat1 ,
or mOle I.t pUt(bu~r'l DpUOIl, all OT 'beto'" (be 15th da)' o[ uch fll(Cttdinl tlktulu montb lInUi lb. b.lance of Jald
Jl\lr~ba~ price Jb~D bave ~n. tun,. paid lbe p'olrchutT lunller IIftt'S 10 ply Inleml 011 thf dlmlabblA, babn.cc 01 ",Id pun:hue 1'rl~
at the rale of &% P"" (tnt per IJIlJlum frDm Ibe 15t:h day 0' ApCi1 I 19 6b,
~blcb lnldt:lt than Ix: t!tduct~d 'rom cub m~t.llm4:nt JMy-=tnl and Ibe balanct Df C&ch pl;YMf1Il Ipplled 1n. ro:dl:lct.lon of priadp,1
AU l*}'l'IIrnb 10 be made benWlCkr IoluU b~ made I.t
or .It )ucb otber plate u the ItUe, may dlrKl In ... riIWS
*lh~ expenBe of maintaining the ea5~nt rald during pe~1od of time purchaser i9
constr:uctins.!l house on the above property ..,Ul be pAid for in full by the purcheu-r,
and thereafter will be shared equally by the grantor end grantoa nnd their BUcce580~Sa
This property LInd ellscmenl. will be used for one (only) single family dwelling which shall
have a m6rket vntue of no l~s. thon $25.000.00 under the existing ~rket price in this
ar~ as of Apfil 1, 1966. S~llp'~8 wilt give A de6d rolease on thi' ptoptrty ~hen the
pr!ncipal batanc~ haa baen reduced to ~2,2S0.00 or less.
~ nimcd ~II Ln Ihl" rontnct, '°date of doJltll" shan bc _________ .,. ____ . __ _
(11 Tht J1\IHbntt auumn and IJTft'I to pay brfofe IkUnl1utlKY ,11 tu~) .Ind aUotUnnnl. Ih.t flU)' ., btl",,"" JrlRtor .In,1 tnntH
brrf~htr I'Hnmt a UEII on uld real rllalt. Ind If by Ib.t Ittm. al Ibl$ (onlnet tbe purrhuer hu 'U'UfK'! paytntnl "" an~· rlllutl:a~,
cnnlr.lr\ n. nlbrr cnrum!Jn.llfc. or bas u.<IImtd payment ftf Dr .IeRm Iv ptlrcha'loC' tublt(1 10, Ion), tUe) or notl'mfn\) nnW' ;II li~n rut pill
lui t~blt, tbt purtt.uc-r 'IIten 10 ply Ibe Nme "dll~ flcllnql,ltnotY,
ell n, rtuub:ucr .Il:rns. vntJ. the rtU'r~hl..'lC" price I, lull)' pard. In llrel' Ihe bulldhlp '"'w ud hurah,r rolacrol IIJI I-,lIld ,ral '~I"'I,
ifl'Ulullf'lo Ihe 1clu:I.I cub v~luc IhuCClf IIltRlll!)1t lit d:LmaKI!' I"" Imlh rite Inll wlndltorm In a fOmp.\n)' utcptalde tn 1M ,",Ikor anll , .. ,
,111· .... llrr·' IIf'Jleijt, a! hb Inl,rnt tal, appt.r, .nd 1(1 fIIIv al1'l'rnn\QfIU thfr-r[", and 10 drl\vtr .11 rolMn iA<l tffi~ ... ab thuC\tf h.
clw"II.,
III Tilt INhh.\tr .I,tTrn Iha' f!.lllin.pt'CHfln of ~Id tT:r.1 ttlatr h.ll herft m.IIJe &.nIl that nc\1.hu 1 M 1>I'ntf nor hi .. .l~'lrn' th:tll I.,. t'flo!
.,. Imy "·It")n.! rn~rlln, thf fllndltlon 01 ... ny Imf'fll ... tm~nl~ Ihelron IIl1r ... ,\1 Ihe pUfchAloC'r or Il'lkr tit lilt lUtl~n~ 11.1 nlh~r tIt lIelll II'
~n:-, I 1°\:1 II:Inl Ilr l.t:rrtmrnl for allc-r:lllnl'u. Iml"'I'·l!'mrl'lb or r~)1;11n unl1''' Ihr f[t1',nJIII or .I~rrtmenl rrlit'il Dn b ro",b!l1tI! hrrrin lIT i ..
In InUinl: ,,,,I ull~chd lot) ~ftd m.de a lI'ft "r lbl. tllnlt~(1
UI Thr ,,,url';Utr lUIlJmU all huard. (II d.s,rnaMr I .. Clr d,'!lurlion n •• nl' Imllf1l\'rm~nl.l now c.b ""W rt.at "Iill' .. t hflUfitl "l.:I/fll
Ii .. " 'on lIno! ,'f lhr IIl:ln( nl ~lt.I tul t,tollr ur any lurt IJlrf~pllur JlUlllic u).C': °m·luM'f"o 11Ial n'" ",ch Ibrruct, tlr,Uu(lil'n n, 100Unl: .h.l11
".11. ·1011111' , :~Ihm of (Dtl')olfrlUl1n. rn DIM' an), rar: 01 uM ful I'Ilir b laktn fnr fl'IMi~ U'O("_ tht jlI'tli"n pf I"" fC'ln,lflnMllnn :t'iUllt .. ':0 unin!.: alII" 11~)'m(nt "llf!lUl".1lI, t1~"I\~1 III 1"'(I[u,in~ Ihl" IoIrnC" ,1»11 bo: ~Id II, ltot f't'llu and .Iptl!kol! .)1 1'.I.\·"..rnl nn thr Illln-hl ...
I'lio ( t",,,·in. unlt.~ Ibr loo.'l1rr rlE~h 10 ,111)'" thE l'Imhuu il'lS"pl) .11 tIr • Jmll1l'1n "I 'llrh f"nlkMUUlln iIl¥l·~fllln Ih, w!'ulltlinl! nr IT-I"r"
'''''1 ·.1 .,11.· Inll.rlw~mrtlh li:tmll:rd h)t Illch ,-,.Unlt In ( ... ~ "I clamuC' nl 1I-l'l1runlon lrum .I ptril Int.olml 11:.\111,1. Ih, 1'mt",l. "I 'ad,
In,uu"tt' f.nn nin!! :lf1n J'iI),mtlll ollhc fUI"nllliIl' t'lprn-c (II rrncutinl IhE l.fM lh,1I be-nn'1lIN 10 thfo t'C"Otnrallpn III rrl,ulhl,"l." "I "I' b
jmllll,\·rmrnl' 1\'1Ihill a rtHllnabl. tim,. Vft!c'" ITluthuer tlrct~ Ihal MId Pf •• ::rrds ,1\;11 I'M' 1t.iJ·J III th~ loti"., Ito, "I'IIUut!lIn ,,1'11 flat l.tlr\h~~r ,'fiu hrtrin ~.:' 1':1
(\) The IoC'l1rr II .. dcfh-crcd, or a~ 10 dtUnt whhln IS din Dr tht ~It nl cllKIlII', a pltrthun\ I lit -hrt In iuntl~rlf lnorm. fit a ""mmIIAlt1ll Ih"dor. bNt~ by WuhlnJ1l1n Tilt,. Jnlurllntc-Cnmpany. In'UrllC.~0IlSllrh~1~'v 1111"",,1 I'll ~1,ll'lItrl.'\\l' I"nlt alPl,ul Jo_ fir d.r"au by miO~ of dtlfft In "n~r'. 1111. 1".,..1d. rYat "I,.~ ..... ~~oi'Xo: ar4'"llf*!,.m. tI"
f1rrl 'lloln' fIolhrr Iball Ih. leIDurln.: ~I""\ h: V
• I'rint~d Irnnal rUfptlvnl .Ipptarin" En aiel po-UQ' form;
h UrAl 0' EIIcumbnll.Cu whit" bJ 1M lInal 01 thb ('Cholr&" IhI PIIrd1a.r b 10 u&umt, ~r U £k lb.. cPl'~ hCffl.lJlI!U
I, IR> h' mati; Il.IbjtCI; and .. 1 ~'i .) .) ~ ~""... ~
c Ally ,d.lln. ~Dlrut or c:onlftett WId" _bleb .Iltt I, punbulnl .. 14 1ft1 nt..I'1 IJ'od, SbY mortatl''1} Ollltr ~""IW
.,Ikt br 1h.1I. 'Dnlntt A(rtn to r-J'. ~ or nkh for IN p'Jrpo" of IhI.J par:qn.pb m ....a t. ... ,~ (r.t1Jllo.
}o ... ~\ll.\l:P
'"';1 ',e
("\, ,.,
fbI 11 Hl1n', tlUe to laid rut dal, Is tubJtd to aD. nhtlal (Otlfrtd or COIflraclt lIodn 'trhkb _1kf 11 ~1tlwlrtr IIId ruJ nUl'J
fir an)' mCrI;::I;:c or olhet obllpllon, .trlth »tUn b 10 pt:y, teUcr "'~ 10 ml.k.e ruch p'1f1U'nU In Attord.uu ",lIh tb. Itna. llitrto/, c.nel
ur"n .1r1:IlJ\I, Iht purchllscr .ba.U lu.w the Nllt 10 mab J!'l:t p.Jmcnu I):CftMfy 10 RJDC .... the dcbull, IlId any JIIyICcntl fO mid •• h.U
be :l1'f>\ird 11;1 the Jl&),mcn1l ntll ,.mn, due UallClIn "lnder thll contn.t\
{n Th~ kllfr aJ~I, upon rredrlDJ fun p&ymnlt of the plrthllll: prla: LDd ./f1lm:rt In ,hi mlDMt Abon Jptdltc4. 10 nttUl. Ihd
ct.lh'u In pulch)'\"" ,1_tlJ~btr "';Irnnl1 ___ ~,_,_ . dred 10 IIlrl tell tllIl., n:tcpUac uy pion thmo' buultrr
t.1kf" 'nr public UM', bn Gr cncumbnlltel ~(tJIt Inr that ClIY aU.ach .It" &'1' (If doatnl throuJh In)' ~rJOJI !llhcr thu. tN tentr, 1M
'uhJUI In Ih~ 'olh,,.,'llll<::
l!l UnItt.' a dilftttnt dilll!: b IlrovicWi lOT Jl.cn:tn. tbe pI.Ittburr ,lull bt c:nUl1lll.1lo palLtOSloD. 01 .,.Id rul nul. on dltt 01 dOItn,:
anll to ft'.IIn. fl1HM."IoIon J.O lonl u tn:rtdiucr b 1'101 In f.ch,ult butIJl'ldcr, The ~rcb~ CIIvtpnll to-lterp tbe bulldi!!11 aAd lither \JtIPfov~.
n\l'nh <>n IolLd rul t~ult In t:lIOd :cpah .nd nol 10 permit waste ~d not to Ute, or permit tb4: UK of. tAt" rnl titJole for Iny 1Il~1
I.Uflll1,.-The run:haHt covenant, to ~y.n tc1"Vke. hutdat10n Of tatulructlotl. chllrpllior Wller,leWrr, elmtldt)'. prbq;r at othu-!.lUll',
-"I:rv!cn rUtflr~ed ttt &aId real esUle ... !tu lhe dllt put'tbuef It ~lllled 10 pc!'trIWiaD.
(0) In (Slot tbe pu~ bUs &".mallc Ill)' Jl&ymeot htnln provided or \0 malnutn I",unn,e, u btrtltllTqulrtd. the telkr mil)' mai.e
Juch (l.1.}'ment or Clft!;1 .utb Imlh'UCl:t 1Ulc!. In), ,amaLllllilO pdd by «he teller, to~tbn' .lIb JOln'tlt at tht ule 01 iOl' per Inllum ihtrctln
lrnm d3te nf flo1!ffDfn! unUI ~1d, llIalI be npliYAble by purcb~ on wllct"s detl1lfld, An wi!bout tJrelucllce to lUly olhr right tbe teller
ml~ht hll\"1: b)' rU:lCln of ~u(h dellub,
I 101 Tlm~ It 01 !.he nscltCe 01 this contract, and It Is Irrete!. Unt In CJ~ tM purl;blk1 ahlll faIl to Ulmp!,)' wllb at pcrfonn Iny
font/IUon Of IIltmment bClTOr (lr to pa/te any r-Ylll~n' requlttd bereunder pn:.mptly 1.1 !he dJJlt and In tbe maSlntr hertln required, Ib~
~Ikl may cln;! 10 dcdue II, the l'urch1Kr'. rtgbll bereunder ttrmln~'.td, Ind lIpon his dom, to, In p:tymenh made by tht p\HCb~et
hereund~r anI.! an !mplovtmmt:l placed upqn tbe nal estlle &hIli b( lorldted to Ibt teller u llquhbled chml~e,. 2nd tbe to!lltr ,hln
h:ln rl.c;.ht 10 I't·elltu Mil t..1ke pGu.euloJl. ar 1M rell nUh; Ibd co W11vef hy th~ .,encr of Iny ddslIll on the plrt of the pUTCh&~r ,hal!
~ CUMlnrcd u • ".lillt:r ur an)' sub$(qllml del.foult
Scnll(C upon puKhuer of .11 dc=.ands, nClU~ or alher papers Mth rtJp«l to forrdhU't'.I~ ~cnnlnallon of purd;uet'. rltht. mly be
m:ldt by Unhed Stlta toh.tI. p.:m;a:e p~.pakl. mUrl!I RC!'lpl :requultd, dlr«'l~d Ie the pI.In:huef It hit. ~ddmi lIn bown lit 11M ~l1er.
(II) Upon Jetltr' .. tltctloll te bnnj; swt to. I!nforn Iny covenant alIbI! (ontract, Jndudltlll' Jull to nlled .",y paymrnl rtqlll"d
h~f"C'undcr, the putChlHCf a~t:5 10 Jl!IY a rts~nlblc 111m iU allome),', fttJ and all COils Ind up~n.KS hi wnnf'Cllon wllb ,uch 1\111, "htfh
IUtTlS shall bt induded In any JUd&m~n.t or deuce enlut:rl in Jucl. IUlt
II Ihe sdt~t ihlll brlntt ,1111 10 pl'O'=\l~ at! adJvdlcltion 01 Iht Irnnlullon of the-purd'l$(r'. riJh!s herfundcf, .nd lud,lMcnt Is ~
enlered, the purcb;Utf I!fRe, ht pel)' a ~!onlhlr JUm as Iltorncy', feu Ind all cosh Ind (%p!n~ !n mnntttlon wIth nl(h sull. and Iho
Ih(' reasonable cort 01 .nn:hm, tt(ords 10 ddmclne the fOndlllnn. or IIUe II the dlle .vell sI11L Is commenetd. whkh tUrN J.h.n be
tnt/ydre:! In Jny Judgment or dKrtt' enlered In lutb 11111
I."l WTTNESS WltEREOF. thf partie. bertlo bin' .e-trfUttd Ihh Irul~~1 the &'e 6nt written Ibovt ~·!!:m::<11dWd.u.t.. (Sr.A1\
. ~-~~_ ..... ~4:f-("','
_ . ~a:afi:'..a'...k.!::~u!-:! _ (.""
]; 1t1 (j a.~~~! v<:"" (.~!..,"f: .1r:.!:-. d· k(.~ (au.L)
STATE OF WASIfJNGTON.
Counl), 01 KING
PAUL V. WER.'aR and MARGARET WEItNER, h:L!!" wife and
III LLER,-ld. "if. . '::5''';;~;' \.II-ud MlOo .. ~uttd Ih within and f~lnlt iJUlrumml: and. lang"ledXtd t"hat
t he it IU"r Inc!. VOI",nlll)' Irt and cltd. rar tbe UKofo and Pl1rpo~u
~\'''' on'" •• , ....... ~'!"!ilI...t Ib" 12th
\,,~ .. ;~~(~. ~,
··'".;,f ,. 'f!'
""1;";"/
I
•
; ,
I
t
•
Alod for Record
at the request of:
SOOS CREEK WATER
AND SEWER DISTRICT
P.O. Box ~8039
(
14616 s.e. 192nd Street
Renton. Washington 98058
easement No.: 3[)'23·5·S1004
Project· ULiD NO. 89
Ta. PerceIIO#: 302305·9071
Grantorls): MAX L. and CHARLOTTE FRAZIER
3340 Talbot Rd. S.
Renton. WA 98055
8
•
Grant.els': SOOS CREEK WATER I< SEWER DISTRICT
AGREEMENT FOR EASEMENT
(
THIS AGREEMENT, made ,his .u "-d~y of '"'to de • 1997, by and between
SOOS CREEK WATER ANO SEWER DISTRICT. e Municipal Corporation of the Stet. Qf
WashIngton. herelnaft.r t.rmed the "District". and MAX L. FRAZIER and CHARLOTTE
FRAZIER. hereInafter termed the "GrantlJrs M
,
WHEREAS. Grentor •• ro the owne.s of land at 3340 Talbot Road Sorrth, Renton.
Wasmngton. legally described as follows:
The East half of the North half of ,he South half of the Norlh hoif of the
Southea.t quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North. Range 5 East.
W .. M .• in King County. Washington. lying East of Talbot Road;
Except NorlhetlV 100 feet and Eest 218 f.et AND thet porllon lying
Nann and West of the following Une:
Beginning at lhe Int.rsection 01 the Eest Hne of Telbot Roed with
a line 30 f.et North of tha South line of said subdivision;
PAGE 1 Of 6 J\ln,jD.IHJ
. ___ .. _ •• _ ...... 8,i. J
~Ublic ~ecog!
I
Il
'" .. ;;
l!
~
il
~
a
§
"
~
Oeated By. d@4'9 filii lted. 'l:j7j'l6t"j 1l.U.66 AM PS'~
I
I
l~
I ~
c
•
(
EASEMENT NO.: 30.23-5·51004
thence East parallel whh said Sovth line 435 f .. ~
thence Nonh 10 the Nonh line 01 u1d sub<fovlslon.
WHEREAS, Ihe DlstriCl requires en easement for B sanitary SBwer rifle Is) across
Granlo(. propeny at 810eollon more specifically desctlbod hereinbelow;
NOW, lHEREfORE, In consideration of \i." id..J •• J t ~%i) (1ZiJ6.70)
and olher Good and
valuable conslderetion In hand peld, ,eceipt of which I. hereby acknowledged, and In
consldBratlon of the performance by tho District of tho covenants, terms and
conditions hSlllinafter ut forth, Grantors hereby grant, convey and quitclaim to the
District the following easement:
The West' 0 feet of the abovo described paresl.
SaTd easement Is fQr the purpose of lmltBUing, constructing, operaUng, maintaIning.
,amovlOG, ,"pairing. ,eplacing and using .... IUlfV 'awar IIn"(.) and appun"nances
thereto, ali designated above, together with the nonaxclusrva right to ingress to and
egress from asid portion of Grantor's property fOt the toregomg purposes.
ThIs ... ement I, granted ,ubject 10 and conditioned upon the following lerms,
canditlon. and covenants which .he partl .. herebv promise to faithfully and fully
observe end perform:
1. COST OF CONSTRUe nON AND MAiNTeNANce. lIle District shall bea, and
promptly pay ell costs and expenses of conslructlon and maintenanca of the !lani1ary
sewer line{s).
2. USE OF PROPERTY 6Y GRANTORS. The G,antors ,hall ret.in the right to u."
the surface of the e8SemBm If such use does not interfere wllh lnatalfatlcn of the
sanitary sewer line[s). The Grantors shall not erect bulldlngs Of StnJClures of a
permanent nature on the easement during the ex}stence of said easement.
3. THE DISTRICT'S USE AND ACTIVITIeS, The I:Is1rlct 'hal~ lithe ... 1 property
Of easement Bre amorbed by the maJnttmance, rOl1lOVill, repair. or replacement 01
such feclntles. restore the surface of the real proJ)elty or easement us nearly as
possible 10 the c;ondition In which It e:ldsted priGI' to the commencement of
maintenance, removal, repair, or replacamant-
PAGE 2 OF fj ..... 0. 1117
~" ... -.----....------,,-_... .i.e v!J~~ .. -.---.....~ ............. --~~. -----.~... . " ..... '"
elea~18d By. dchCyg
",
"~
~'
t
.. ,:':;:
•
( (.
EASEMENT NO.: 3I).23-5-S1004
4. RESTORATION. The Dbt~ot wi .... tOfO Grantor's pro)lOlly to • condition ..
good .. or bIIn.,lhan Ih8 premises were p~.r t. snlJy by the DIs1r1ct. I'hotognophll
wm be taken prior to COIIItnJctlon on .ald property to assure the con1jl/et."... .,
rest .... Jon. Rnal restoratlen wllllnchIde, but .hsIlnot be OmHsd to, sod rapla<:emenl
In axlsUng lawns, hv~rooeedlne In unimpr.,..,d 818", replsnllng of .xlstfng s/Jrubs snd
bushes or r.plBtemant of Isma. LIIfll. treas thaI .lIbt within tha pennanent
.... ment may be removed during construction unl... olherwisa notad In this
....... nt document. Fe .... , roek.rIs. sod concrete, .. phall andl« 9111V111
drivsw~a, elc. will be repaired or ",pi_d. D .... ged trees will be removed
and d1eposed of and the District will provide reasonable compensation.
5. ATIORNEY'S FEES. In cue sull 01 .ctlon I. commancad against the GIII01I".
Of the au ......... , heirs or .... Igns of I8ld G .... lola. IOf I.moval 01 an .n.",amment
from this .... ment. the Grant.rs hareby promT •• to pay, In addition to cost. provided
hy.tstut •• such wm •• th. court may adjudge I •••• nabla .. attorney'sfeea therein.
6. EASEMENT TO BIND SUCCESSORS. This ... emenll. perpetual and aholl be a
covenant running witt. the land and shall be binding on ~h8 successors, haIrs and
assigns of both of the parties h.relo.
7: EXEMPTION FROM EXCISE TAX. Thl ..... menll. OlBnted under the Ihrea10f
eminent domaIrJ proceeding. by tho DIs!~ct. end thar.fore Is •• empl from Slat.
Excise Tax..
s. DURATION. This .... m.nll. permanent end shall "1C]>lre only upon agreement
of 1he parties hereto, or lhelr SUcceSSDTS andfor assigns.
PAGE 3 OF 6
"hJa. 611649MB I:)oc. Ke.1991 9112691656 ~Ublic ~.cp~ age 0
. ~ t •
r, :
Beated By. dalqg Plillted.1:fift.61311.1!J.66 A~l pS'fJ
(
EASeMENT NO.: 30-23--5·S1004
CHARLOTTE F A \.
Sf ATE OF WASHINGTON)
COUNTY OF KlNG ) ss.
On thls {J,{,ti day of ~fl., , 1997, bel",. m. "",son.1Iy appearad MAX L.
FRAZIER end CHARL ~RAZIER, to me known 10 be the Individualls, described In
and who .lCIICUIad Ihe within and lo"golng Instrument, and acknowledged .ald
Instrument to be tha ltaa and voluntary aet and dead ., aald Granto,., 10' the uses
and purpo ... tho"ln .. entlon,d.
WITNess my hand and oHicial .e.' ha'eto affIXed the dev end year above written. ,
PA6UOF6
Xl, de,. 611649648 !'loco 1((.1991 911ze91eSe
or tha Sta'a 0'
, -
~ublic Resr~ age 4
'"
elealEd By. ddicyg Pli1lted. 211i%613 11.19.65 M·' pJ
~
):>
r-
OJ o
I-~
U:D o
o::~
I-en
(/)
o
z
o
2.0
ULiO NO 89
• ,. ,.,_., ,~" -.
(
EASEMeNT NO. aO-23·8·Bl004
0\
E\ ~\ :\ o
'IT ~\ I '\ (JO-23-5) c i:ll \ SlOGS (0?O1
i m ,\~ VRAIlUCK 0( \
• ~ -10' PERM EASEMENT 1'c50'
10 PERMIT \ ,~ ,~ \ I(J) _.L __ _
I
If))
i~
1<
1(5
i m
I,.
i:ll I~
101
10 Ie:;
1% .g ,:II ,0(
i •
~AseMENT NO. 30·23-S.81004
PACE 5 01' 5
aYe 0 Cleated By. dalCYY Prillted. 2f7IZeB 11,19.66 Idol pJ
DRAINAOE REt.EASE
Th!a agre6Ptocnt made thlSo 'G.k day ot .iJfi.l'-rL ___ • 19~J'
118)( L ~ F'ra=ler ll.er-ell'1lt.tt.et' cd led t.he t~AtjTOR. and KING
COUNTY, a politicsl ~ubdiY1B1Qn a£ tbe state a£ W88h1ngton.
herelna£ter csLLed the CRANtEE, and whereaa GRANTOR
repraaent& Gnd ~.rrant8 ~ho~ It is the owner in lee of that
cartain parcel o£ land. described ae follows:
S£ 1/4 o£ Section 3Q, Township 23, Range 5£,
Tex lota 22 and 71 aitu~te in King County. Waohln9tQn~
end whe:eae the CRAN1EE i8 prQsantly reviewing a drainBgQ
plan tor e prcpomed Bubdlvlalcn perp't for the p~oJect known
8G Liberty View. £ile ke. 87~G9S, on land located at=
24 acres lying generally b~t~een 5.E~ lSeth and 1?oth
St~ect (1~ extended) and generally between State Rout~ 55
~hd Stet. H1Shwoy 16'
~nd ~he=eaa ee!d plon P~QPQDQD ~D dlYert :rcm their nBtutBl
course o£ £10'101 car'tain l!.u2:;"£aclI: end Ot.C:I1:"1I\ water-a so Be t.o
caUae them tG CEASE TO FLOW cnto the land oE the Granter,
now, ~here£o~, in cQnaide~atLcn of the approvol c£ Grant~e
of dlvers!on in said plan, the gr.n~c~ hereby ogreac end
ccn~enlQ to the dive~elon ot euriace and storm wa~er8 ~hO~
ITS LAND ana to hold G~Bn~ee hernIecD £or any damBge that
may be cauDad by ouch dive~alon of £low and thlc conveyance
ohall be a CQvenant running ulth ~he land Bnd ah~ll be
binding upon GRANTOR and ita haire, e~caeGQOI:'D ~nd aaalgna
:£ot'eva:c".
~~A_~n ~~a~y pereqnally appeared be£ora me 4fMJk..~.. t.o ale kn~n t.o be t.he .Lndlv1dual(8)
deacribeij in and ho-;;;cuted the within and £oregoing
lnet~umQn~, God 8~knowlcdge~ that they algnmd t.he ae~e as
their £ree and yclunta:y act. and deed. £or the uaea and
purpots.._ the,%eln lften~10ned. H t'J:~ .,
.hLve!, under 111'1 hand Bnd a!£.t.eiai. a.d.~i1t.h18 :.?~dGY
of ~ :L9Sa. N(lt,iI!IIt"y ,!~Uc/n tlnd ':f'Q!' tho Stata o£
D
1
Wea1i1ngt.on, redd:l.ng at. -~ .. -:,,-~-~:::: i
, f! ",,""H. ________ 0_~_· .. ~~:~~, -,.,.~...,........,.,e ~""'~: ~,...,..--""_
:;
51 del ,,6lt~3648 eat. tre::1388 886~t46383 fleah::d By. daicyg Plhited" ij1i2fJ13 11.z~.43 Jd" PS~
, i , ,
11,0 iU~L M ~7 /lJI.~ (Jz'I, ~
''''''~ :d., .".;.. t.L p.-..1 (dd, k .... ) ..,.c(:6e
jdl'J' -::t( J,.-.,f. :;z . ...;.,4' 4c ,,~ f"<A ~
.....,;t( (" "1 ~fU' .... ; M <4 r;z;.~ ~, ""G jd( rI
IQ!l7.
• ." .. ~ .•. :." --::: . 'r'
a,de,. 51lB'l~B'l8 eat. ~e.t988 88MH6383 eealed By. daiqy P,;',\ed. ~2613 tl.29,43 A~I P!i~
-
FIled tor Record at the request of
SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT
14616 SE I 92nd St
POBox 58039
Renton, Washmgton 98058-1039
Document TlIle(s) SEWER SPECIAL CONNECflON CHARGE #199
Retelence Numbel(s) ot Documents dSslgned or released N/A
Addlttonal reference numbers on page _ of document(s)
Granlor(s) N/A
AddItIonal names on page _ of document
Gruntee(s) SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT
AddItIonal numes on page _ of document
Legal Descnptlon See ExhIbIt "A"
Addlllonallegalls on page _ of document
Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s) See ExhIbIt "B"
(lidEI. 611649648 Ilot. kC.2666 26661211661711 eealed By. dalcyg flillted. 2j7i2B1311.19.1~Jd'l P~'fI
SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 1889-8
A RESOLUTION of the Boam of Commissioners of SODS Creek Water and Sewer
Dlstncl, KIng County, Washington, eslablishmg Special Connection Charge #199 due
Soos Creek Water and Sewer Dislne:! for the Talbot HIli Trunk Project
WHEREAS, sewer mains and faclhbes have heretofore been Installed as part of the pro)ee:!
commonly known as Ihe Talbo! Hili Trunk Project, and
WHEREAS, said sewer faCilities Will proVide benefits and seMces to the properties
de!K:l1bed 111 Exhblt "A" attached hereto, which IS made a part hereof by thiS reference thereto, and
WHEREAS,lt IS \he poliCY of Boos Creek Water and Sewer Dlstnct to require reimbursement
for any faClhtles bUill by the Dlstnct and/or by an IndiVidual when said lines provide benefit and
service to other properties, and
WHEREAS, the OISlno! engineer has detarmlned the properties benefitted and computed
the value of said benefit as applied to said properbes, and
WHEREAS. the Board of CommiSSioners finds said benefits and the cost thereof to be
reasonable, and the SpeCial ConnectlOll Charge Rate based thereupon to be a fair allocation of such
benefits and costs,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of CommiSSioners of SODS Creek
Water and Sewer Distne:! as follows
SECTION 1: That Sewer SpeCial Connection Charge No 199 IS hereby established for the
properties and In the amounts shown In exhibit "A', which IS Incorporated herem by thiS reference
8ald rate does not InClude cosl of oonrectlng, stub service, permrts or Inspecbons, general faCillbes
RESOLUTION NO. 1889-8
SUBJECT: Establishing Sewar SpeCial ConnectIOn
Charge #199 Due SCWSD PertaIning to
the Talbot HIli Project
PAGE-1
•
charges, or other latecomers that may be due on the properties
SECTION 2. That no service shall be proVided to any of the property descnbed In Exhibit
UA' prior to paymenlto Ihe Dlslncl of Ihe above established charges for all property held by Ihe
appllcanl which hes Within Ihe area descnbed In Exhlbrt 'Au
SECTION 3: Thai a Nolice of Ihe adopbon of this ResolutJon as SpeCial Connechon Charge
shall be recorded wllh the King County DivISIon of Records and Elections
ADOPTED by Ihe Board of Commissioners of Soos Creek Water and Sewer Distnct, King
RESOLUTION NO. 1689-S
SUB-JECT: Establishing Sewer SpeCIal Connection
Charge #199 Due seWSD Pertaining to
the Talbot HIli ProJeel
PAGE-2
~Ublic~eCr~ age 0 oeated By. da'eyg P';IIted. 2ffl26!3 !1.!~.!4 AM PS~
•
= c.., = c ...
5005 CREEK WATER & SEWER DISmlCT
SEWER SPECIAL CONNECTION CHARGE NO. 199
CONTRACT NO 1·955 -Talbot H,U Trunk
Base Maps C-l a 2
PABCEL"A"
lois I and 2 of I<mg County Short Pial No 1171127 recorded under Audrto(s File No
7803311125, said 51\(,,1. Pial bell1g a portion of t~a Southeast GUarte, of Section 30, Towns~lp
23 No~, Rang. 5 Easl, W M , In King County, Washington
LESS the North 30leet 01 tha West 170 feat of • .,d Lot 2
PARCEL"B"
The Wasl170 feet ollhalollowlng desenbed parcel
That PO""'" of the Soulh half ., lhe South hall of the SouUl half 01 tho No~east
GUartar ollhe Southeast quarter of Secbo. 80, Townslnp 23 North, Ranga 5 Easl,
W M ,Kln9 County, Washlngton.lym9 Easl of the Kent·Renlon Road,
LESS Ihe No~erty 17 r •• 1 as measured along •• ,d road of the Wesl170 f.elas
measured along the NOr1h Ime
PARCEL He"
The South 150 t.at 01 theloUowmg doscnba<l parcel
ThaI poruon of the Easl haU 01 the North hall 01 the South hall 01 tha No~ hall 01 Ihe
Southeast quartBr 01 Secllon 30, Township 23 No~, Range 5 Easl, W M , King
County, Washlnglon,I)'Ing Easl 01 961h AvenUB South,
lESS the North 100 leel
LESS that pOrban Wesl of a line thaI IS 435 leel East 01 !he m\e"oc\IOO of the Eastorty
hne al Said mad With a line 30 leet North ollhe South hne of said SUbdIVISIon
The SOUI~ 270 feel of the Wesl550 IBel,
LeSS Ihe East 90 feet of the NollhSO foelof said Soulh270 feel 01 the WeslSIO feet af Ihe
followln9 desenbed parcel
The No~ 330 fael of the South hail 01 the No~we5t querter of lI1e Southwast Cf1JMer
af Sechon 29, Township 23 No~, Range 5 eel, W M , Kmg Counly, Washington,
LESS the EasI660 leel
PARCe. liE"
The North 150 fael of the Wast 150 leel altha 101l0wln9 doscnbed pa",el
The South hail of the NoMhwest querter or the Southwest qUMe, at secuon 29,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W M, Kmg County, Weshlnglon,
LESS the Na~ 330 feel,
LESS the Eas1660 1 •• 1
Spedel CDnneedon Charge
Sewer Stub ServJC'8
$ 74.85 per Front Foot
SI00 00 per Stub S.""ce
~,de" 61l1l4§Il4B !'lue. Ke.ZflOO 2000tl1l061717 !j.UbIiC Recr~ age 4 u Eteated B9. dalcyg Pihlled. Zi1i261311.1~.:t4 At., p;;I
•
....
~ ....
co =
~
'" -
= = <:::>
'""
EXHIBIT "B"
soos CREEK WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
SEWER SPECIAL CONNECTION CHARGE NO. 199
CONTRACT NO. 1·968 -·Talbot Hili Trunk
Base Maps C-1 & 2
Special Connection Charge Tabulation
Front
F 'D4IOO4I03\SCCl99lb. rs/'JfJ197
·o,dei. 61tM!648 eue. 1~.2666 2ee612116617t7 fleated By. mliCY9 P,illtEd. 21712613 1l.1§.14 Ar-I p;I
AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF
PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN
City of Renton Planning Division
1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057
Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
being first
duly sworn on oath, deposes and says:
1. On the -3/ day of ::g-.xv <' ' 20~, I installed --:---'1,-1:-public
and plastic flyer box on the property located at
·~~Llllll!:~..J..IIl..A.:~~!f[L ____ for the following project:
]~\'¥)()! ~(l,A ~ ~'n.tt(A £\ ,,\
Project name
~d.\o'\'\.. \'(\~ts:~\V\Q.(\\s. \-\.A.J
Owner Name
2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to
indicate the location of the installed sign.
(~ .. /}nstall~re
SUBSCRIBED SWORN to before me this 1\S.'!>,; day of '\)tl..t\Y\\)t( ,20~.
\'\\o.ri.¢-.. ~'\l~O-~5 ~ .... ~~---.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for thesteof Washington,
residing at hl>J'{(\ \N~~
My commission expires on 3 \i RECEIVED
H , \CE D\Data \F orms-T cmp 1 ates \Scl f-He Jp Handouts \PI an n ing\pubs i gn. doc
JAN 2920:.
CITV OF RENtON
PLANNINGPDlvdl:,W
-RECEIPT EG00018847
BILLING CONTACT
David Albers & Zazhary Lazo
Maldiz Investments LLC
1509 N 80TH ST
SEATTLE, WA 981034422
REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME
"~'~"""=~'m,~'m"'~~' ,~ ,ro~ .. ".~~~
LUA14-000095 PLAN -Environmental Review
PLAN -Modification
PLAN -Short Plat Fee
Technology Fee
Printed On: 1/2912014 Prepared By: Gerald Wasser
"''''~, -
rnr=
TRANSACTION
TYPE
Fee Payment
Fee Payment
Fee Payment
Fee Payment
Transaction Date: January 29, 2014
PAYMENT
METHOD AMOUNT PAID
""'M~,"
<check #1805 $897.00
Check #1805 $100.00
Check #1805 $1 AOO.OO
,-,heck #1805 $75.00
SUBTOTAL $2,472,00
TOTAL $2,472.00
RECEIVED
JAN 292014
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
Page 1 of 2
r
RECEIPT EG00018848
BILLING CONTACT
Greg Diener
Pacific Engineering Design, LLC
TRANSACTION
TYPE REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME
I LUA14-000095 I PLAN -Environmental Review I Fee Payment
Printed On: 1/29/2014 Prepared By: Gerald Wasser
Transaction Date: January 29,2014
PAYMENT AMOUNT PAID METHOD
.-"-'---~
pheck #72656 $103.00
SUB TOTAL $103.00
TOTAL $2,575.00
RECEIVED
JAN 29 ZC'4
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION
Page 2 012
~,~~