Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 1:s; (\ ~ =< :r )> 1l 0 ...,, :r ~ ---j ~ • i Ill 't !1:·j2 iA .,.... ..rzl I I i / )~ ", . r : -.,.,..-.~ .;, >. I ;,,.,,-""'~ .,· \ u ·---,,.= \(/ .,,,\ V -··'~::::,,, \::;1 11(""''1 LI/U. --,r·····,-i .. '1·· .. i::.. · -: -.:-._,._.. :· .. • · 1 111 " l-11·· ' .. , 1 ... ~ .. r::r -• I I .. J I !!I r--,L,: !f·· .. , ! . J .. 1.. .... . • H · c~ ·~1 ·--· -s. ! - L -· ·· .. v-•,,, •.•..• : .. , .•.....•........• ,.. ..j•.. .. ~l Ir, '!.. ' .. · ........ ;·· .. , ·········-·... ·· ,-.i · · 11 .. .. . I -. I I r-Jl+f .... J"'i .. ,,,?i '~, i l :: ... -, • -· .. i .. " ~ 1--.-· ·, i I i 7 1 .. i , If. 101 t. } )' ! \ 8 \«,...,.,w.,,w, -· :. f ! Ul I l .. · 1 .. ···,,,, ..... ,.~ .. , .. -.. , .i ...... , .. (.. ! i J .. • rn r 0 i~· : t···'·,·····i ,\ ·1-"'-··'""'"--··· (Jt ;· ' """1t .=•<>,£/ ', ' _(\ : .. .. .. .. : . 1·.. ·-:1., .. · .. ····,'e;,.,/. ", 101c. ··\'"'"'"' O • ·.. · · ·-4·""".L. ... ~ ., 10 ' 0 1;'.... .. .. r•·T41t·· .. ......,.. 5 I I .. L~r;--! i I l ··-1~··, ; .. l i,··"i,._, : f i i ... 11 "i·-·.:r--.. , .. '' . .. ' 1 · .. 'i .,I ' l:' .. L .. I .... I ... ,_, ... 'I\ ~ ....... • ,. I t r·: ~ .... ,1.. ... .. ~-··! >' "· Ii !I · .. 1--·• .. I ,.. I 1 ' .. 1·· .. ••· · .. ' .. '!·· : ... · ,,, . l ,.. ., . :a '1 '"''L;i,._~.e-j ; i i ._, . t: ', /,, I l .... ;.1··1 .. 1i , .; t/\,1 /" .. t-... , .. ,1···1 .................. 1t' .. L "'''\ .. / & . r<, ... ·\ ;;;;f;:;o;:J .. , ··i }•.;;;,4\ \ 1 1 ""'''"'\,. -~·····,-J I •... , 1··-.il 'I : '' ''t'.l"·- I 1 I I .. I .. !( .• i ' J:: '.~1 i '. •• J:'l·· ... Ji~! . I· ,. ; r1·1 f";"l"H,jilljJj i:-.l •. i -I 1 .. -» .. -···t -t, \t, r CJ )> r;; ~ )> )> z-1l ---j CJ~ 1l rn i1l rn C\ 0 zo < :S', C rn i1l z CJ St=< ...,, :r CJ 0 rn rn i1l ~"'() (\ )> )> 0 r~ z l/1 l/1 :r ~ rn rn i1l z C <---1 (\ 00 :::! rn...,, 0 l/1 CJ z rn < rn r 0 "'() :r rn z ---j ~ (\ z =< ~ ~ ~ :::! ~ ---j i5 z ~ ~, fl 1· (\ ···,. ~ -~ .. ·· .. /~ .. /··1 10 p"' .. ·~ I l \ """"" +, f t IV , / ' :cc, ~ ,., 10 -· .. ,4 ........ ' :r-:f ti ~I-~'. ,.~ .... i ...... ,: .. " .. · .. , ..:f·f· .. i:-.. · · .. 4 :: ~ '·,a. ,; 'f )\ 0 t ,,, \, . ;')f, e,f' .. •h,,4;l( .. # ~ '\,;%<~'·., ,{' ~ }<"'111 ' ! 1',i ~'.)L(.~f,., ' -," '.J</' "-,.,,,," I I ----~ ~=~"'"""J lt.t..~i,,.,"'"''· j "' ' .... ·--~ i -.. . .__..,,.....,.,, ,I -~-) L, 1 \ ) I / L---.,J.\ , . 1 l I .. ,,., j I I l @/ i ( . I ' .... ---..,.K.• .. . \ .. = ...... •• \f ·.. . l i :' -... Jf--1-\ k JI J ./ </IJ;~ I ·1 f /t:l &:<,, · · ,,.,,.,.~~--1,. .. -~.L -- J9 ~ < (/) O> DI m <O Cl> ;o '< <D ;o :a O 0 DI :::, a. ' ' s: (I)~ ;o iii ~ltmann Oliver Associates, LLC I AQA rollm:m Cauboa,W""""" orr-1<1l1n1.,n,. .. ('"J"'-'"'" I E,nm,....,ental Fl6URE I, VICINITY MAPS ALTERATIONS EXCEPTION PLAN LENNON PROPERTY -· TAX PARCEL 11222305'1004 -"""'"""' OFF-SITE MITl6ATION FOR TAX PARCEL 11342305'1202 3188-MIT-11-14-14.dw~ ' ·I•'-'( .·:/ ,, li:i !·f . t:· ii,' 111' · . :j, 1 .. 1'· , , ' ' ..;. ··1· . ' ·:~ REVISED 11-14-14 . 'i: ~,..,. ...... ~ i ' l I • ' f r t. I ' ~ ! ·' ' • ,., ·:"'¥i1"l .. :~~-l--~ ?r 'I'· ·~ •• , "I'" --~.-;i _,i:. ";r . .;. ----..,...;. (!l"·i:c..-__ ~-.'7,,:;r..:. -~-"" · ·· ··· PLAN LE6END . ~M_f-~ /~ ··r~ .. l r-:;1.f_t,;!t)-· -------PROPERTY LINE !:"··.~:-~:~·~:i HETLAND BOUNDARY (HETLAND DELINEATED -·-·-·-·-· BY OTHERS) --------STANDARD l'ETLAND BUFFER ---------------15' BSBL -•-•-•-CLEARING LIMIT -a a. a SPLIT-RAIL FENCE 1-'!ITH NGPA SIGNS !PLANTING ON IMPACT SITE 1 I 4" DOUGLAS! I SEHER LINE,INSrLLLATION \ ,· A1: '-~I\ : \ ~ ; ', \ \ -\ l ~ -~--~--A2 ------' --' ---~ _: m~ •• , . ' •• , ·\ 455.1 _ ~ .~: : _:.:~ , , ~ ~ ~ , .e·~ ~ ( \!..9 ~ 1--~.; ::..:-_ \ ~ \ \ \ I ,, ·~;-- • · · • · · ·' · ·• -...; \ 1 I --~II • • , • , . ~3. J 454.9 ,®, 'l:J --~ :, -~ -.-:"'"";""~"-7"""-·-.-.. ----t-I I) -~-_:_-'l..t-.; /, . . I \ I _ · _ · -.• 454.B@" ( 1 :-:!• / ® :_ ... t O' / " . • / 24 " ••• />.§ .• \~/ / ., -~, • 455.0 \ 320 • ' I I I I . ' ..it,, :·;, .•• , 10"~ / . . TRJ;:ES T9. BE " . REMOVED·DUE 1:0. . . ROT -S6E '454.4 . ~R.BOf?.[ST'S. · REPORT.-. LEAVE· NOTES I. BASE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ESM CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, LLC., 33400 8TH AYE. S, SUITE 205, FEDERAL V'IAY, V'IA q8Q03, (253) 838-6113. ..-,•.,-:: ~'lJ'.-, • .• -~ =~-· /S~~:;;;:1~:~~~B;~{:i:~:f:;:1{~~:~:~:~;}\: I I ® EB ® :'!-:-,.;.: -~/!/~_- SITE ALTERATION AREA . : , .. · ;,_·_·,::··'7,.2.'.".·,?POO·-sf= BUFf=ER · 1MPAC.T FOR NEH GRAVE( "t>~'vE··-·. ·~~''cC''j,235' SF IMPACT FOR SEl-'ER LINE INSTALLATION c· · .. · ~'-20 SF TREES TO BE REMOVED -13 TOTAL(12·0F-WI-IIGH-·-·· ARE SIGNIFICANT TREES) ... . -. . . .. TREES TO BE REMOVED DUE TO ROT -4 TOTAL - SEE ARBORIST'S REPORT TOTAL BUFFER IMPACT (TO BE MITIGATED OFFSITE -SEE Fl6URES 3-5.) SIGNIFICANT TREE MITIGATION -3d FOR TREES REMOVED OUTSIDE BUFFER -INSTALL PER PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS 6,255 SF (12) I GALLON CEDARS \ I I ' • 6' DIRT SLOPE, 10' / GRAVEL, 3' TO HEDGE \ \ SLOPE, 12' VEL, 4' TO HEDGE 100' FROM~MAJ!IHOLE, 3' DIRT j,' 1-'!ATER LINE I TALLATION , I .,.q°""' 1\\\ I ~ ' ' I • I ; j -~ . 'Ir·~ =~ --~~~' -=-~~--· 1,~ J_, "'l~o~--""; -.,. EX. GRAVEL ROAD ENDS, NEV'! DRIYEl-'IAY BEGINS ~-=---=--·:::-=.-.:_-:_-:.--~-~-~-~=-: \ DOUGLAS FIR HEDGE TO REMAIN 15' GRAVEL, 3.5' TO HEDGE 4' DIRT SLOPE, 11' GRAVEL, 4' TO HEDGE I I I I I I I I I I ~-~ ,/,..-J\ / / .,. 5' DIRT SLOPE, 10' GRAVEL, 4' TO HEDGE 4' DIRT SLOPE, II' GRAVEL, 4' TO HEDGE I I I .,./· I /" 0 ALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE IMPACTS V'IILL BE LOCATED V'IITHIN THE SITE ALTERATION I I I ~ 20 40 60 80 SC.ALE, I '40 1do N y," .,. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BY, KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE, .'If" ~-~£ -~~ ': ;:!O;:!lfl~n\.;l "lli°'<"a::!-1 z a ~ !:: L w ~ I- ~ lj lL z \[) If) ... zz a <( -_j I-0.. ~z ~Q _j Ii::,.. <( w 1- w ~ O'.'. !:: w H= iJ) I.fl C) "50'.'. Ni= U. w <( z O'.'. DL C) ::::,WZ \[) I-z --lW lL <( _j 3 ~ ·~ . JJlt u • ,-l l ,-l a e . . "' . " ' -~ ~ g I "' "' «: ~ " ' -~ ! ~ i § E , .= I «: ' s N tr 2 N st w _j ~ < u. X ~ O'.'. C) lL 5 ~ \[) I- L ~ If) I lL lL a ~ • ,; ! I ~ I ~ I .. Si I "' "' M ' ,~~"'·-c~ ·c.·;=;:;;;:-: f'. ,,. .. ~ .,~...,,~, J . -_,,.,_.,,...,. __ ,,.,._ . ..,_ . ""~----... --·-=·.-.~4~~,~o<., ......... ...... -.......... ' ................. ', ' ' ..... ' ' ' ' ' ' \ \ \ \ \ . A-12 .L ."-.. "4· !"!J. " ,.., -'ii<-> ..... ~._,,-,--. •, ··-. ~-="·h-~ .... ---.-. .. __ .,...~""'" .......... SERENTON- MAPLE VALLEY ROAD-SR 169 -·· -.,.·-;~-"'' ~ .·,:-· ··;~-~'.'."""',' ... "~·~· -k·~ ..,, ... --.,-.-......-.•. ,-···---~ ;;_·:,~;-, _ _.,. _.,.•"-• ·.;~·.~~•-"-L ·c ~i :~ !;i~~~:~~~*~-;-~;.-~J;._"€~:--~---~- PLAN LEGEND ~"'i'-····. -··-. -..... ,~---- --------PROPERlY LINE · '. ''".:' .'·.~,-,. ·.- . !:" ·~: :-:-: '. '."=".'·7. t HETLAND BOUNDARY (~ND OEUNEA TED. -·-·-·-·-· BY OTHERS) --~~--.: -,_"; .... !,:-:-....,;".:--::--t·.--. ~-,: .. - --------STANDARD 50' BUFFl:R WITH SPLIT-RAIL 1G'.PSl;EA$8,!ENT FENCE AND NePA S16NAISE 16'flRAINAGEE:A8EitENT ---------------15' BSBL nl\7\"7 i VIV\:' j L .. / .. ··· • A-11 HETLAND FLAe LOCATION !-10,000 sf I EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS WITH AUTOMATED 6'.TE WATER EASEMENT ...-,,_ llEWER EASEMENT 2004072700108e SITE PLAN 14207 MAPLE VALLEY HWY CA EXEMPTION ..-..--.-----~ TOTAL SITE AREA= 264,409 SF L GRAPHIC SCALE N APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BY, MITIGATION LEGEND ~ BUFFER ENHANCEMENT t:=:=':::::::=:::::=j ADDITIONAL BUFFER ENHANCEMENT ~ HETLAND ENHANCEMENT 6,255 SF 5,8'15 SF 5,110 SF I I 0 30 (IN FEET) I I I 60 '10 120 SCALE,1,60 IJO KIN6 COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE, ~ • ~ A ~ tr 6 i= z 'SI" <{ :s () \[) !)_ () i= Z IY -() U) ~ i= () eilh!=~ u.i 0 Ci "' lt >< u.i "' ::, u.i {l_ " [ll \l) () _j .. 6 Ci~ rn i= o.. Ci u.i <{ z <{ Ci (i () {l_ (!) \l:1 ~ >< -_j u.i <{ l)_ <{ _J f- " c:3 lit; < ~.J u l .-l ' .-l " • . . "' . .., ' ~ ~ ·u ~ 0 ~ ~ ! «: ... ~ :: ·-I 5 : § I s ~ -I «:, ! :i I .. I I .. Si I ., ., ~ ' .. ~.L .,.,.~, -,~"'-":··,>./.--.- f ' .. ~ ,-....... ;;;4.,;. . ..-...-•. _ • -,,,, ' _f ~->-----~·,, •. :ca:o~i.-,4;-~~+ .. • ·-~~'-_ I I I I I I , 1-:_, __ ..::: V V V V / V V ~ V / V . ...__.....__ ---i -..... -..... , ..... I I I I I I I I L __ I ....... ........_, II ',..._, ', ' ' k___ ', I ----' I -----' ',,, ' --..,. V V V V ' '': -, ' ',, ' ',, ' ', ' ',,, ' . ' ., _, V ' \ ' .... _ ''.""'--. _.,, ... .,., .. ,.,. irrtr1 ...., .... ...-'... <~:····~_:-:.' _,. -,-__;,:"::",'f.t:5P' _"?;"' ',,,'',,, ', ' '\ ' \ ', \ \ ---. .;...,~---,- .,., .. _ \ \ \ '--------------------------... ' ' ' '-------~~ '' ·-·, ---·-' -·-·-·-.. . -· I '·-·-·::;:-·-· v. • I w V V V I I V i. \ V V V V ;_,- V V V V \ \ U) \ ill O& ::, rt ill ill \fl )' ill z _j I ~ <( :I: \ /\ I • £ &_.,; ·--~-, JijjS L; '""""' -~~ •-n'•·•-'••,.....,;....-,,~_,~. . f. --.. -~':--~;:,:~~>:-i}~~~~~~?~i: --,~-. PLANi LIST {5Ee FICSURE 5 FOR GOMPLETE 561:iEDlJL:EJ<:'"' TREES KEY SCIENTIFIC. NAME - AM Ac.ER MAC.ROPH"!1.l.UH C.C. c.oRYUJ5 c.oRWTA PT POPUUJS TRlc.HOC-ARPA PE PRlJNU5 EMARGINATA PM P5BJDOT5U6A MENZIESII SHRUBS KEY SC.IENTIFIC NAME HD HOLODISCUS DISCOLOR L LONICERA INVOLUGRATA MAHONIA AGIUIFOLIUM PHILADELPHU5 LEHISII C.OMMON NAME 616 LEAF MAPLE l"IESTERN HAZELNUT BLAc.K C.OTTONI-IOOD BITTERCHERRY DOUGLAS FIR COMMON NAME OCEAN SPRAY BLACK TWIN-BERRY TALL ORE60N 6RAPE MOCK ORANGE M PL PC. R 5 PHYSOCARPUS CAPITAlVS PACIFIC NINEBARK ROSA NUTKANA NOOTKA ROSE SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS SNOHBERRY 0 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) I I I 10 20 30 40 SCALE I, 20 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BY, 6l N KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE, z z <( "Sj- <( _J C) _J [l_ C) a.. z IJ ©Q ~ z t ~ rn i= ill I-N zUl}'.N <(><illN _Jill a.. .. a.. \fl C) _J z ~, w .. C) SL U "Sj-l= [l_ D'. ill <(Z<( ~fri~O.. (!)f-Z>< _ _Jill<( lL <( _J f- ~ 3 JiU u l ....l ' ....l ~ . . "' . " ' .ls ~ C) • 0 ' "' ! "' <: ... " i .2: 6 I C I § E ' .,:: I <: ' ' (}I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ' ,-. " I "' "' ~ i !" ,,. " ,c .t: ......,._ ·.,,-;."':'!~. _j mit~"'!' '"""..~~=' -- -;-·1 , I I , I V I ' . V l \ ~ --~ .f9 lii 9 -~ ~ !,L / w / w V \fl /I w z '_J :t: I.) I-- '< I: \ V \. \ " \ v\ I I I ----------- ',,, -' ' ' ;,._.-·-·-·-·, --V V V V V V V ·,v ' ' ' ' -- ' ' \ \ -- \ \ \ I ,,, 5 ·-~·~~~.:,_~t·~~ :r~-. .:,.·~-_-, ' . •'-' -.,:,.~:,_..,.. ··-....... tr ffi-··....C- \ I \ \ #.h.-'•· \ I I I I I I I I I I I I . -_ . . C,cc>;;c,-,-- -PLANT SCHEDULE (F9R ()l=f'~TI=-Mll16ATION Ar<EAJ TREES KE'( SCIENTIFIC. NAME COMMON NAME AM Ac.ER MACROPHYll.l.JM 616 LEAF MAPLE c,e. CORYUJS CCRIVTA Hl:51'1:RN HAZELNJT PT POAJLl.15 TRlc.HOc.ARPA BLACK COTTONHOOP PE PRUNl.15 EMARGINATA BITTEROiERRY PM PSEUDOTSU6A MENZIESII DOU6LA5 FIR 5HRUB5 KEY SCIENTIFIC. NAME COMMON NAME HD HOLODISCUS DISCOLOR OC.EAN SPRAY L LONIC.ERA INVOLIJC,RATA BLACK THIN-BERRY M MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM TALL ORE60N <SRAPE PL PHILADELPHJS LEWISII MOCK ORAN<SE pe, PHYS0C.ARPU5 C.APITATl.15 PACIFIC. NINEBARK R ROSA NUTKANA NOOTKA ROSE s SYMPHORIC.ARPOS ALBUS SNOHBERRY \/ NGPA SIGN (TYP.) , SEE DETAIL \ \ \ \ \ \ .. SPACIN6 Cf' o.c.. Cf' O.C,. Cf' O.C.. Cf' O.C.. Cf' O.C.. SPAC.IN<S 6' O.C.. 6' O.C.. 6' O.C.. 6' O.C.. 6' O.C.. 6' 0.C.. 6' O.C.. "" ..... C _;; Ill ~ ....... ..,_, ___ , .. , ... --~ ·--~~~ ........... ·~--· ~--~~~-~-!:-_.§·~,~~~~i~:b-:~'~'.~-~2; _:_··~~: - GT'( 21 2Cf 31 22> 2<! GT'( I<! 60 12 11 143 e,1 e,e, ~ ;:.,., ;_ -v'.•.\?~~;-. 51ZE (MINJ --WTES ' ·-'. • 2 6AL '·'-· · 'SINelE-'TRIJIIIK _2.eAL>--, --~ MJLtl-.511:M (3 MINJ 2 6AL. SINISLE TRUNK 2 GAL. 2GAL. SIZE (MIN.) I <SAL. I GAL. I GAL. I <SAL. I GAL. I <SAL. I <SAL. SINISLE TRUNK RJLL' 8U5HY NOTES MUL Tl-CANE (3 MINJ MUL Tl-CANE (3 MINJ FULL t BUSHY FULL t BUSHY MUL Tl-CANE (3 MINJ MUL Tl-CANE (3 MINJ MUL Tl-CANE (3 MINJ NOTE, PLANTING MEETS KING COUNTY REQUIREMENTS FOR TREE DENSITY TO BE q• O.C. AND SHRUB DENSITY TO BE 6'0.C. \ \ \ PLANT SC.HEDULI:: (FOR ON-SITE TREE REPLACEMENT PLANTIN<S) ""· \ / \ \ ,\ \. \ ------TREES ---KEY SCIENTIFIC, NAME ',, Tf' THUJA PLIC.ATA --' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' COMMON NAME HESTERN RED CEDAR \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 SPAC.IN<S AS SHOWN ON FIGURE 2 GTY 12 SIZE (MIN.) 2 <SAL. NOTES FULL 4 BUSHY GRAPHIC. SC.ALE (IN FEET) 10 20 30 40 SCALE,1,20 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BY, bl N KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ---------------------------------~ ------\ \--4::t <'-'-.:./.'--"), -J. \ \ I -~-----DATE, ' ~ z z <( ~ <( _J () _j Q_ () Q_ z 0- \[) Q tS ~~~~ z\J()<'.N <( X w N _JUJQ_# Q_ \fl () _j ZM UJ .. 0 .,_ I.) U) i== Q_ [)'. w<(Z<( <:'l ~~()Q_ \[) 1--~ X 1, _-.JW<( lL <( _j 1-- 3 < ·~ I ~ JJh U I ...l l ...l ' ' . ' "' . " ' t:5 l ·u 2 0 £ ~ ~ < ~ - ·-I a~ § 1 ii ~ -l < ' ,~--·,;, ~ ~ .; I " I ~ I ~ "' I ~ ~ M -----·" -·-,, vi-vi-I I ,.,,,.,, .. N.11.Vlla ,t '! ,. {/{ ., '')ii, ;ti~'. ·1,,:;, ' ' I.! ; i I i I ·1.: I ~ iZ ~ ~ ii\ i . ' i, . :t· . () • ~ .. :j ' i ,:.i.; I 'i j .. ~' C:OC:bSO£C:v£11 l:!'J<!lVd XV .L <!lOd NOIJV9LUH :I.LIS-ddO vOObSO£C:C:C:11 l:!'J<!lVd XV .L ,l.J.<!i:ldO<!ld NONN:11 NVld NOI.Ld=l".)X=I SNOI.L Vc!=I.L lV 11\f.L:la N91S Vd9N/M :l'JN:ld c!VQ:l'J llVc!-.LlldS '9 :!d(191d z _J () - I-<( \) I-w z IU z Q () \) z I-\I) IJ) () - IL \j) <( IL \I) z ' -------:{: -------IU \.} z IU ~ IL 111 ' ...J ce ~ Ii ~ 2 ~ ~ <( ~ I ~ < z -...J @ Cl ~ I I Q ~ I \l ;::: 1---~ Cl IU ~ C) IU ...J IL 3 @ \.} ;t IU I!! 1---D L ~ ~ ~ ~ a! ~ X ~ ~ ; _J • ~ z z ,I) I rr: 8 - X ~ ~ i ! <( ,I) n: - Ii I -I ---r I-j _J IL Iii \j) f-: z wO-,£ ~ ND'i w8l ~ !..1,1.p·vr-n-T T-.LIN-BBH: y Q y :::rn 'sarepossy iaA!IO UUlllllllY I-z w :z: 0... () -I w > w z D \fl () lLW i== () ~ \) ~& :::, ~ ww :z: \fl \fl I--I z () D:'. <( \) <( I- 0... z D:'. Ww () Dz: LL !=5 D ZD:'. ~ :::, -Of () 0w D:'. w 0... \Jl D I- 0... ~ ~z <( <( '"'<( D \l'l I!! ii\ 1---u !!J ~ Q_ I!! ii\ I IL IL Cl ~ I!! ii\ ' z Cl w i!' z Cl z Cl i== < ...J ;i 1--- lQ ~ Cl IL -···· ________________________________________________ _. ,w, - '. ' J' .,. . ~-' :~ ,.,. _..,.,., ...... .:.< .... ,-;"'~----------"--t-<·•-~--·--,~ .~---. ·--~ ·~·<'---·~ .. ---.,. ,; ........ •,. 5Ff;CIFIC.ATION5 . :-r....-. -::"· _7-."7:,';:J.._~{i~~::.·'---c--"'-·J!<-s.·· -~--_.;::-.:;._ .. I. PRIOR TO ANY rlORK HITHIN THE ENl-lANC.f:MENT AREAS, A SILT FENC-E HILL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE C.LEARING LIMITS PER Kc. STANDARDS. 2. Kc. NePA Sl6N5 SHALL BE INSTALLED PER KC. STANDARDS AT 15' SPAc.lNG ALONG THE PROPOSED BUFFER BOUNDARY A5 DEPIC.TED ON FlcSURE 3. 3. ALL PLANTS SHOULO BE INSTALLED BETWEEN DEGEMBER 1ST AND MARGH 15TH. 4. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL, EXISTING C.ONc.RETE FOUNDATION SHALL BE REMOVED AND BAc.KFILLED TO EXISTING 6RADE HITH IMPORll:D 3-HAY TOPSOIL. 5. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL, ALL NON-NATIVE VEGETATION HITHIN THE ENHANGEMENT AREA SHALL BE 6RUBBED (RoOTS AND GANES) BY HAND. THESE PLANTS INGLUDE, HIMALAYAN AND EVERGREEN BLAGKBERRY, ENGLISH HOLLY, ENGLISH IVY, REED GANARYGRA55, THISTLE, JAPANESE KNOTWEED, NIGHTSHADE, SC.OT'S BROOM, PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE AND HEDGE BINDWEED. AOA SHALL REVIEH HEED REMOVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS. IMPORll:D GEDAR GROVE C.OMPOST SHALL BE BAGKFILLED IN INVASIVE REMOVAL AREAS AS NEGE55ARY TO PRE-DISnJRBANGE GRADES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MAll:RIAL 3" MINIMUM AND TILLED INTO THE TOP 6" OF NATIVE MAll:RIAL. 6. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PIT-PLANll:D IN PLANTING PITS EXGAVAll:D 2X THE DIAMEll:R OF THE PLANT. PITS SHALL BE BAc.KFILLED WITH A 30rl0 MIX OF. STlffiRGO OR GEDAR GROVE GOMPOST TO NATIVE SOIL PITS SHALL BE AMENDED WITH A HYDRAll:D SOIL POLYMER (INSTALLED AT RATES PER MANUFAGTURER'S SPEGIFIGATIONJ. PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED 2" HIGH AND SURFAGED MULGHED TO A DEPTH OF 2" WITH MEDIUM-GOURSE BARK MULGH WITHIN A 24" DIAMEll:R RING AROUND EAGH PLANT. BARE GROUND SHALL SE SEEDED WITH RED FESGUE AT 50#/AGRE. 1. ALL PLANTS SHALL SE NURSERY GROWN (IN W. WA OR ORJ FOR AT LEAST I YEAR FROM PURGHASE DAll:, FREE FROM DISEASE OR PESTS, HELL-ROOll:D, BUT NOT ROOT-SOUND AND TR1JE TO SPEGIES. 8. SARE-ROOT PLANTS OF EQUAL OR LARGER SIZE GAN BE SUBSTITUll:D FOR INDIAN PLUM, RED GURRENT AND ROSE ONLY. ALL OTHER PLANTS SHALL BE CONTAINER MAll:RIAL. Cf. PLANT LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY AOA PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND APPROVED UPON GOMPLETION OF PLANTING. 10. UPON APPROVAL OF PLANTING INSTALLATION BY AOA, KING GOUNTY WILL BE NOTIFIED TO CONDUGT A Sill: REVIEV'l FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF GONSTR1JGTION. II. PERFORMANGE STANDARDS INGLUDE I) FOLLOWING EAGH MONITORING EVENT, THERE WILL BE 100% SURVIVAL RAll: OF ALL PLANll:D TREE AND SHRUB SPEGIES AT YEAR I AND 85% SURVIVAL RATE FOR YEARS 2-3 OR EQUIVALENT REPLAGEMENT OF A COMBINATION OF PLANll:D AND RE-GOLONIZED NATIVE SPEGIES FOR YEARS 2-3. 2) AFll:R CONSTRUCTION AND FOLLOWING EVERY MONITORING EVENT FOR A PERIOD OF AT LEAST THREE YEARS, EXOTIG AND INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES WILL BE MAINTAINED AT LEVELS BELOW 10% TOTAL GOVER IN ALL PLANTED AREAS. THESE SPEGIES INGLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; HIMALAYAN AND EVERGREEN BLAGKBERRY, REED GANARYGRASS, PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE, MORNING GLORY, JAPANESE KNOTWEED, ENGLISH IVY, THISTLE, PERIWINKLE, AND GREEPING NIGHTSHADE. 12. MAINll:NANCE SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED ON A REGULAR BASIS ACCORDING TO THE SGHEDULE BELOW. ANNUAL MAINTENANGE SCHEDULE MAINTENANGE ITEM J F M A M J J A s 0 N D WEED GONTROL I I I I GENERAL MAINT. I I I I I 1-8 = NUMBER OF TIMES TASK SHALL BE PERFORMED PER MONTH. MULCH 3" DEEP 24" DIA RIN6 2 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER SET PLANT STRAIGHT AND PLACE ROOTBALL ON SOLID eR0UND OR ON GOMPACTED BACKFILL BACKFILL PLANTIN6 HOLE 1/2 FULL WITH NATIVE SOIL, TAMP SOIL TO STABILIZE ROOTBALL DO NOT DISTIJRB ROOTBALL. BACKFILL REMAININe PLANTIN6 HOLE PER SPEGIFIGATIONS. AMEND BACKFILL AS NOTED IN THE INSTALLATION NOTES. MAKE SURE CONTAINER TREE/SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL (t~p.) N.T.S. 0 <> 0, BACKFILL PLANTING HOLE 1/2 FULL WITH NATIVE SOIL, LIGHTLY COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS AND ALLOW WATER TO SETTLE. DO NOT LEAVE AIR POGKETS. BACKFILL REMAININe PLANTINe HOLE PER SPEGIFIGATION5. AMEND BACKFILL AS NOTED IN THE INSTALLATION NOTES. SGARIFY SIDES OF PLANTINe HOLE. MAKE SURE HOLE HAS 600D DRAINAeE. ~ FOR BARE ROOT PLANTIN6 ON SLOPES, INSTALL PLANT IJPRleHT ON LEVEL SOIL TO ASSURE GOYER OF ROOTS OH DOWNHILL SIDE OF PLANT. GOMPAGT SOIL UNDER ROOT MASS EXISTIN6 NATIVE SOIL. BARE-ROOT TREE/SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL (t~p.) N.T.S. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BY, KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVIGES DATE, 4 If) _j ;:; ill D \D z i== ~ a'. .. N C) N I, 2 ~ \'() .. _j ill ~ ~ ... z st I-- If) <I'. C) [i zo: Oo C) I, lL i== 5 lS ZC) <I'. -\'() 0ti::(:Nj:: ~ ~ [i f:1 ;;; 0xill .. ~ ill w (L _j 1--'ls \fl C) w f v,z[i\) ..oo...rtw r--i== <{ l-- ill & 611. if l~~gt ~ ~ jjfj u ! ...l c ...l s .. ~ . 0) ' ~ ~ ·u ~ 0 ' ~ t < ~ 0) ' > ! 5 ; § I s ; -l < ' .. ~ .; I ~ I I i: " I ~ ~ M t" • CITY OF RENTO:r9 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: October 6, 2016 To: City Clerk's Office From: Sabrina Mirante Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Lennon Property Critical Areas Exemption LUA (file) Number: LUA15-000120, CAE Cross-References: AKA's: Lennon Property Critical Areas Exemption Project Manager: Angelea Weihs , Acceptance Date: February 27, 2015 Applicant: Patrick Lennon Owner: Patrick Lennon Contact: Simone Oliver, Altmann Oliver Associates PID Number: 2223059004 ERC Determination: Date: Aooeal Period Ends: Administrative Decision: Approved with Conditions Date: March 9, 2015 Anneal Period Ends: March 23. 2015 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Aooeal Period Ends: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicant is requesting a Critical Areas Exemption in order to conduct wetland and wetland buffer enhancement activities on parcel number 2223059004. The purpose of this project is to provide off-site mitigation for impact anticipated on parcel number 3423059202 in unincorporated King County, under King County project number CAEX14-0008. King County is conducting SEPA review on project CAEX14-0008 and is acting as lead SEPA agency. King County Department of Permitting and Environmental Review will be reviewing this off-site mitigation proposal for consistency with King County Code 21A.24. The property is 264,409 square feet, located within the Residential-14 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre Zone, and is currently vacant. The proposal is to enhance 5,110 square feet of Class 2 wetland, which runs along the southwest corner of the site, and 6,225 square feet of wetland buffer. A protected slope is present in the far southwest corner, beyond the wetland. No work is proposed within the protected slope. The work plan involves removing an existing concrete foundation and non-native veoetation from the subiect areas. and olantino native trees and shrubs. The aoolicant submitted a wetland repc lelineating the wetland, prepared t aedeke Associates (February 3, 1995), and a memo confi .... ing that conditions have not changeu (Raedeke Associates, November 18, 2014). The applicant, Altmann Oliver Associates, concludes that the purpose of this plan is to enhance the structural and vegetative diversity on the site, which will lead to an increase in habitat and overall functional lift over existing conditions. The applicant is proposing to plant 144 trees, which include 27 big-leaf maple, 29 western hazelnut, 31 black cottonwood, 28 bitter cherry, and 29 douglas fir trees. No trees are proposed to be removed on site. The applicant is proposing to remove reed canarygrass and Himalayan and evergreen blackberry prior the installation of native vegetation, which includes 19 ocean spray, 60 black twinberry, 72 tall Oregon-grape, 17 mock orange, 143 Pacific ninebark, 87 Nootka rose, and 88 snowberry. The applicant proposes to remove 30 CY (cubic yards) of concrete. 100 CY of weed removal will be replaced with 30 CY of imported topsoil, 160 CY of compost as a soil amendment prior to planting, and 35 CY of mulch. Proposed mechanical equipment include: a large track ho, bobcat, dump truck, and excavator. No pesticides or herbicides will be used. A silt fence will be installed along the clearing limits prior to weed removal. The site will be seeded after planting to cover all bare areas. Work will beain as soon as oossible. location: 14207 Maple Valley HWY Comments: ERC Determination Types: DNS -Determination of Non-Significance; DNS-M -Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated; OS -Determination of Significance. DEPARTMENT OF CC MUNITY AND of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER: CONTACT: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: PLANNING DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS EVALUATION FORM & DECISION March 09, 2015 LUA15-000120 Lennon Property Critical Areas Exemption Angelea Wickstrom, Assistant Planner Patrick Lennon 35815 SE David Powell Rd Fall City, 98024 Simone Oliver, Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC PO Box 578 Carnation, WA 98014 14207 MAPLE VALLEY HWY The applicant is requesting a Critical Areas Exemption in order to conduct wetland and wetland buffer enhancement activities on parcel number 2223059004. The purpose of this project is to provide off-site mitigation for impact anticipated on parcel number 3423059202 in unincorporated King County, under King County project number CAEX14-0008. King County is conducting SEPA review on project CAEX 14-0008 and is acting as lead SEPA agency. King County Department of Permitting and Environmental Review will be reviewing this off-site mitigation proposal for consistency with King County Code 21A.24. The property is 264,409 square feet, located within the Residential-14 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre Zone, and is currently vacant. The proposal is to enhance 5,110 square feet of Class 2 wetland, which runs along the southwest corner of the site, and 6,225 square feet of wetland buffer. A protected slope is present in the far southwest corner, beyond the wetland. No work is proposed within th protected slope. The work plan involves removing an existing concrete foundation and non-native vegetation from the subject areas, and planting native trees and shrubs. The applicant submitted a wetland report delineating the wetland, prepared by Raedeke Associates (February 3, 1995), and a memo confirming that conditions have not changed (Raedeke Associates, November 18, 2014). The applicant, Altmann Oliver Associates, concludes that the purpose of this plan is to enhance the structural and vegetative diversity on the site, which will lead to an increase in habitat and overall functional lift over existing Page 1 of 3 City of Renton Department of Communh, ·conomic Development Ce , .ate of Exemption from Critical Areas Regulations LUAlS-000120 Lennon Property Critical Areas Exemption CRITICAL AREA: conditions. The applicant is proposing to plant 144 trees, which include 27 big-leaf maple, 29 western hazelnut, 31 black cottonwood, 28 bitter cherry, and 29 douglas fir trees. No trees are proposed to be removed on site. The applicant is proposing to remove reed canarygrass and Himalayan and evergreen blackberry prior the installation of native vegetation, which includes 19 ocean spray, 60 black twinberry, 72 tall Oregon-grape, 17 mock orange, 143 Pacific ninebark, 87 Nootka rose, and 88 snowberry. The applicant proposes to remove 30 CY (cubic yards) of concrete. 100 CY of weed removal will be replaced with 30 CY of imported topsoil, 160 CY of compost as a soil amendment prior to planting, and 35 CY of mulch. Proposed mechanical equipment include: a large track ho, bobcat, dump truck, and excavator. No pesticides or herbicides will be used. A silt fence will be installed along the clearing limits prior to weed removal. The site will be seeded after planting to cover all bare areas. Work will begin as soon as possible. Category 2 Wetland EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: 4-3-0SOC.5.a. Conservation, Enhancement, Education and Related Activities: iii. Approved Restoration/Mitigation: Any critical area and/or buffer restoration or other mitigation activities which have been approved by the City. FINDINGS: The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3-0SOC.5: 1. The activity is not prohibited by this or any other chapter of the RMC or state or federal law or regulation. 2. The activity will be conducted using best management practices as specified by industry standards or applicable Federal agencies or scientific principles if submitted plans are followed and the conditions of approval of this exemption are met. 3. Impacts will be minimized and disturbed areas will be immediately restored, if submitted plans are followed and the conditions of approval of this exemption are met. 4. Where wetland or buffer disturbance occurs during construction or other activities in accordance with this exemption, the site will be revegetated with native vegetation as required as a condition of approval for this exemption. DECISION: An exemption from the Critical Areas Regulations is hereby Approved with Conditions*. Page 2 of 3 City of Renton Department of Communit} conomic Development te of Exemption from Critical Areas Regulations LUA!S-000120 Lennon Property Critical Areas Exemption CONDITIONS: 1. The City of Renton shall receive copies of Monitoring Reports submitted to King County. The Reports shall be mailed to: Angelea Wickstrom Department of Community & Economic Development Renton City Hall, 6th Floo 1055 5. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 2. The applicant shall open up a Utility Construction Permit with erosion control plans to be reviewed and inspected prior to starting work. Please contactJan Illian, at 425-430-7216, for more information. SIGNATURE & DATE OF DECISION : Jennifer Henli'ing, AICP, P/annitfg Director Department of Community & Economic Development March 09, 2015 Date The above land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). APPEALS: An appeal of this administrative land use decision must be filed in writing together with the required fee to the City of Renton Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, on or before 5:00 p.m., on March 23, 2015. RMC 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. EXPIRATION; Five (5) years from the date of decision (date signed). Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT 1 Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AUA PO Box Ti'tt F.tx ('t25) :llli\.4:'!0H Environmental To: Planning & Landscape Architecture From: Angelea Wickstrom, City of Renton Simone Oliver, Altmann Oliver Associates Subject: 14207 Maple Valley Hwy Critical Areas Exemption -Project Narrative February 10, 2015 Date: Attached please find the necessary materials for the above-referenced Critical Areas Exemption. We are requesting a Critical Areas Exemption in order to conduct wetland and wetland buffer enhancement activities on Parcel 222305-9004. The purpose of this project is to provide off-site mitigation for impacts anticipated on Parcel 342305-9202, which is in unincorporated King County. King County Department of Permitting and Environmental Review will be reviewing the proposal for consistency with King County Code 21A.24. 1. Size of property-264,409 sf 2. Current use of the site and any existing improvements-the property is currently undeveloped 3. Is the property fi.Jl/y developed (not capable of fi.Jrther subdivision or development), partially developed, or vacant?· vacant 4. Number. type and size of any trees to be removed/planted -No trees are proposed for removal. The following are proposed to be planted: 27 big-leaf maple 29 western hazelnut 31 black cottonwood 28 bitter cherry 29 Douglas fir 5. Types and estimated amounts of other types of vegetation to be removed/planted -reed canarygrass and Himalayan and evergreen blackberry Is proposed for removal prior to Installation of the above trees along with the following: 19 ocean spray 60 black twlnberry 72 tall Oregon-grape 17 m~k o~nge. _. ~-'2--"".":,: ., ":-..- 143 Pacific nlnebark 87 Nootka rose 88 snowbeny 6. Special site features (I.e. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes)-A Class 2 wetland runs along the SW comer of the site and a steep slope is present in the far SW comer beyond the wetland • . ,. -, "·" -, .... ~ .. ,,. .,. ' Angelea Wickstrom -MEMO February 10, 2015 Page 2 of 3 7. Is the work to be performed in a 'Native Growth Protection Easement' or tract? - The area has not been set aside in and NGPE yet, but will be when the site gets developed in the future. 8. Is the work to be performed in areas of 40% or greater slope? No 9. Is the work to be performed in an area designated with 've,y high landslide potential'? No 10. Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed. 30 CY of concrete will be removed along with -100 CY of weed removal replaced with 30 CY of imported topsoil, 160 CY of compost as a soil amendment prior to planting and 35 CY of mulch. Tl. Types of mechanical equipment to be used A large track ho, bobcat, dump truck and excavator. 12. Types of pestiddes and herbicides to be used. None 13. Measures to protect the site and adjacent properties from potential adverse impads of the proposed work and equipment operation. A silt fence will be installed along the clearing limits prior to weed removal. The site will be seeded after planting to cover all bare areas. 14. Standards and criteria to be used for any tree trimming or topping. No tree trimming or topping proposed. 15. Standards and criteria to be used for any ground cover management. Reseeding all exposed ground after planting. 16. Time schedule for starting and completing work. ASAP, likely March. 17. For project sites located within JOO feet of a wetland or stream, please include: a. Distance in feet from the closest area of work to the stream or wetland edge-invasive removal within the outer 15' of the wetland, buffer restoration between the wetland and the 50' buffer, plant installation within the wetland itself. Attachment G provides detail on the proposed mitigation project. Briefly, it entails enhancing 5,110 square feet of Class 2 wetland and 12,150 s.f. of wetland buffer. The work plan involves removing an existing concrete foundation and non-native vegetation from the subject areas, and planting native trees and shrubs. The goal of the plan is to enhance the structural and vegetative diversity on the site, which will lead to an increase In habitat and overall functional lift over existing conditions. King County will require posting of a financial guarantee, and three years of monitoring to ensure the success of the project. · This memo summarizes thif1Ubmitratitemflndlictecf'ln this packet. 1. Pre-Application Meeting Summary: Requirement waived. 2. Waiver Fonn: See Attachment A. 3. Land Use Permit Master Application Fonn. See Attachment B 4. Critical Areas Exemption Form: See Attachment C. 5. Site Plan. See attachment D. 6. Neighborhood Detall Map: See Attachment E. , Angelea Wickstrom -MEMO February 10, 2015 Page 3 of 3 7. Wetland Assessment: Attachment F contains 12 copies of a wetland report prepared by Raedeke Associates (February 3, 1995), and a memo confirming that conditions have not changed (Raedeke Associates, November 18, 2014. Five copies of the wetland mitigation plan are provided as Attachment G. Items 8 -16: Requirements waived. cc: Rick Lennon C:OC:bt;;;OS=C::v<.21; l=l?'dVd XV! ~d N011V9LllH 3J.IS-::l::l0 VOOb,:;jQGC:C:C:;t l:!?~Vd X'v l ,.U'd=ldO'dd NONN;:11 N'vld N01l.d3':JX3 SNOl.l ~3.l l'v SdVH ,.UINl?I.A 'I ~n91::I ~ -·--_.....,. ...... ""'"'"'""'""'"-... vov J11 's~1Bpos,y J~A!JO UUBWI.JY EXHIBIT 2 _, ... ,:_..._.~---~-~~-·,_ .. .-'-... ~~-,- ·-.· - --, ' -... ' ' \ \ \ MITIGATION LEGEND @'7,,0{{%/a%zj BLJFFER ENHANGEMENT (::::::::: <::j ADDITIONAL BUFFER ENHANGEMENT ~ V'IETLAND ENHANCEMENT 6,255 SF 5,8GJ5 SF 5,110 SF ISERENTON- MAPLEVALLEY ROAD-SR 169 ·.a-.>.c-c· ·--:.;~:es-;~~.~~.:i:\ 0 PL.AN .LEGEND "_"-:':~f~~~~~c..:~~ ~.,:,;.:_-------~PROPERTY LINE ,-_-_ -··.y_~,'""'~ • :;:_-:;:::.:::·:::! ~"';;;~~ARY.{~ljl;?J"EL)~A1ED -.....:~-----STANDARD 50' 6UFFcR Wtn-f5P[..IT:._RAIL 10'P$E!AIIEMEHT FENGE AND NGPA 51GNA6E 0 11i'Cf!AJMGEEASEUEN1' ---------------]5' B5BL GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 3o oo cio 120 SGALE,1,60 • A-# HETLAND FLAG LOCATION 1-10,000 sf I N 00 CD -\IEIIIClE ACCESS --lED .. ,. -WAlEREASEMENT ..... ........, '"""""""' SITE PLAN 14207 MAPLE VALLEY HWY CA EXEMPTION TOTAL SITE AREA= 264,409 SF APPROVED FOR CONSTRUGTION BY, KIN6 GOUNrf DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT AL SERVICES DATE ::: o' z Oz '" i= < a <~ 0 \D Q_ U" -z m !::a o l: ~ tf) rifh~~ lU\JiY~ Li.)( w # Li. UJ a. ....l iil "'0 1U .. Q~~ '" e-< ii!~5(L ::::,WZ X rJl ~ill< U::<....1r- ~ :l .i ~ < , ' 5i ~- S' <l { m >< :::c 1-1 m 1-1 -I w =-":"""~~-~ ~~0.:::-~,:,:~~.;'.._ce_- I I ~-- ' I I I I I I I I I -- ~---- ' ' -................ --..... ..... ......... ', ' [--------',, I ---. ',, ',, ', ' -------.. ' ' ' ' ·\ ., \ ' ·, ' ...,......,_ .. ,,, -------- ·-:,.._,... ;::,_,.;_.;::'.:;~·-~#"[~~~-~~---: '',,,'',,, . --.. ',, ,· ' \ \ \ ' ' ' ' ~--------------------- ' ' '-------. ' -· ' -·-·-I ''-·-·:;-·-·.--·-·-,j I , I I i \ \ \ "'\ I;! \ ij, . \ iL I w I w '" I I w I z =, I I i :,: , -----"----"" -..• -------i---~·-· ;Lfl~r1!~: .;;~:::~:f;u~ TREES . KEY' SCIENTIFIC NAME AM --Ac.ER~ CG COR'T'U.15 c.oRIVTA PT POPULJ.JS TR.IC.HOC-ARPA PE PRlJttJ5 EHAR61NATA FM P5EIJDOT5USA MENZIE511 5HRIJ65 KEY SC.IENTIFIG NAME HD HOLOD15GLIS D15GOLOR L LONIGERA IN\IOLUCRATA M HAHoNIA AGUIFOLIUM PHILADELPHl.15 LEHISII PHYSOC.ARPU5 C.APITATVS R ROSA NUTKANA s SYMPHORIGARPOS ALB.JS GOMMON NAME - 616 LEAF HAPLE ~TERN HAZEl..NJT BLAGK COTTQNl.-tJQD BITTERGHERR'l' DOUGL.A5 FIR GOMMON NAME OC.EAN SPRAY BLAGK TWIN-BERRY TALL ORE60N GRAPE MOc.K ORANGE PAGIFIG NINEBARK NOOTKA ROSE SNOV'<BERRY N 0 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 10 20 30 40 SGALE,l,20 APPROVED FOR CONS TRUG TION w(!) BY, KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE, z ,, z < () < It () u' z " a IS ~ t >-"' w f-" ~~r6S _J~~_j a._z[illl ,;j'..Qo..~ lU ~ 5 ~ O'.; l!:!i X iJ5 -l w-<i iI <( _J I- ci)JHJ u ! .., ' ...J ! '" ' ·1 : ~ ] 0 ii ~ ,, sl m >< :::c ~ IJ:I ~ -f .i::,. -"-""-<""""-··-".".:"""' I ,I I 'I I ----~-.. :_;:, ---: .......... --------,',,, ', \,\ ' ' ---...:......C.-_._.,... ___ ,..._ ____ ··---~------------· .--<--ec·_""""c-"---S:---; -• --~--i-4·-> ----. --.,. . , ~ -"e=~"'~--:;i-:;:<>/::_;;2_;,,;·· ___ : ·_---.-,.c_.;: PLANT SCHEDULE; (FOR Of'f~fij;?1'Tl"ATION - ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \ TREES KEY SCIENTIFIC. NAME AM AGER HAGROf'HlllLM U, GORYLIJS CORNJTA PT POAJUJS TRIC.Hoc-ARPA FE PRl.lt-lJS EMAR.slNATA PH P5EIJDOT5UGA MENZIESII SHF<U65 KEY HD L M PL PG R 5 NGPA SIGN (TYP J SEE DETAIL SCIENTIFIC. NAME HOLOOISC.US DISC..OLOR LONICERA IN\IOLUC.RATA MAHONIA AGUIFOLJUM PHILADELPHJ5 LEHISII PHYSOGARPI.JS GAPITATIJS ROSA NUTKANA SYMPHOR!GARPOS ALBll5 '" ;-< ~> - =HMON NAME 616 [fAF HAf'LE H3TERN Hf',ZB..N..IT BLAGK CO'TTow-lOOD BITTS<a<ERRY DOll6I...A5 FIR COMMON NAME OC.EAN SPRAY 6LAC.K THIN-BERRY TALL ORE50N 6RAPE KXKORAN6E PAC..IFIC. NINEBARK NOOTKA ROSE SNOY6ERRT 5PAGIN6 q• O.G. q•o.c.. q• O.C,. q• o.c.. q• O.G. 5PAGIN6 6' O.G. 6' Ot:,. b' o.c.. b' O.C.. 6' O.G. 6'0.G. b'Ot:,. "-·-1:.~~ ?-.-:-_--!': ~~~.1-~p-.:::t~-t-:""" ._- GT'( SIZE (MINJ .. N::n"ES , ~ 21 -·--26-ALi-~-·-· 5iNSLETRIJNK 2<f _ 0 2..6&.'.c.:.· .. , :· MI...tlZSIEM (3 HINJ ., w 2q arr IS 60 ,2 11 143 8, 00 2 .SAL. 2 6.AL. .26AL. SIZE (MINJ I 6.AL. I 6.AL. I GAL. 16.AL. I 6.AL. I 6.AL. I 6AL. SINeil....E TI<1INK SINl;,L.E TRUNK F<JLL• - NOTES M.1L Tl-GANE (3 MIN) MJL..T!-C-ANE (3 MINJ "'-'-• f3USHT All ' f3USHT MUL Tl-GANE (3 MIN) M.JL T!-C-ANE (3 MINJ HJL Tl-GANE (3 MIN) NOTE: PLANTING MEETS KING COUNTY REQUIREMENTS FOR TREE DENSITY TO BE CJ' O.C. AND SHR!JB DENSITY TO BE b' O.G. l \ \, PLANT SGHEDULE (FOR ON-SITE TREE REPLA.GEMENT PLANTIN6) .\ \ ~ 7 \ G i:J \ 'G . ~ .\ ~ , µ_ I cu cu '" cu .; '_J ~ " c-< ,: -----· ...... ...... -.............. ,. \ \ \ \ \ \ --,, TREE5 ................ KEY SGIENTIFIG NAME .................... TP THJJA A...IGATA ',,'',,,\ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \\ ' GOMMON~ hlESTERN RED GEDAR ~ '\\ ' \ \ ' ~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~-~ '. 0 SPAGINf? (,lJY SIZE ill_lNJ NOTES AS 5!-IOHN ON FIGURE 2 12 26AL FULL I BUSHY GRAPHIC. SC.ALE (IN FEET) 10 20 30 4G SCALE,l,20 APPROVED FOR CONS TRUC. TION -~r:, " 60 Cf) KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT AL SERVICES DATE, ;z ::E ,;/" < _J () _J ~ () [l_Z 0- () "' "' -() ~fu~~ z "~" -,:X N _J cu • ~~~~ 11', ~ 0.. ti I;! ~5< Zf) ~~~ u:~~~ Q ill ~ ~ i •• g ~ -~ i5 I "<Ii \:< r m >< ::c 1-1 0, 1-1 -4 UI . ,.. ----·--. __ ..,.-~'"'---.- 'r. 'r. ;-~~~~~~~~-,..-~~~~~~~~~-, ~ ;, 6 x 6' 5F'LtT c.EVAA P05T /2 < b" SPLIT GEDAR RAILS PITC,H 51JRFAC.E TO DRAIN rFINl5HED ELEVATION ---r WNC..RETE FOOTING ,1~.---BAC:-KFILL WITH NATIVE SOIL 4••~::--::.-::.-::.-::.-::.-::.-::.-::.-::._-:~----GOMPAc:.TE:J GRANJLAR 5"l&BASE j_,,.__j N6PA 5tGN PER KING COi.HT'( 5TANDARD5 POST C.ONNEC.TION ~----- -;~.i~·'?.,. :,~ ~-I ...J ~ lfi <ii i ~ ~ ~ id ILl :,) " < iD I)_ 11. X "' < <( z -=t I- D..: () o< l:5~ ~2 z "' :::!Q ~6 ~0:/:NF ~~[i~i ::i"Wtt_ n_~Q__J~ lfl!Q~w:E ··Q11-:,)w ,.;ii-<1-CD ~PL.IT-RAIL CEDAR FENCE J/'11/NGPA SIGN DETAIL &~~[L~ £~~~~ FOR INSTALLATION ON THE ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE PRO.IEC:.T SITES APPROVED FOR GONS TRUG Tl ON BY, KING GOUNTT' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE, ~hll :J ! .., . ,,; l -ff I ~ ~ ! ~ I § ' -l <' ~ m >< :::c 1-4 c:1 ~ en -~----~ -----··--~ _____ .. __ , -----.. -----·-· SPECIFICATIONS -· ~,.-,;c .,;;__.;;::...;.'.:; i:::,;,-.,._-· ·::-::-:C:..2..-.-·.:...--::.=-:_ =c'-,; __ .:..,;~-'.....:'.:: I. PRIOR TO A.NY WORK WITHIN THE ENHANCEMENT AREAS, A SILT FENC-E WILL BE INSTALLED ALON6 Tl-IE GLEARIN5 LIMITS PER KG STANDARDS. 2. KG Ni.SPA 515NS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER KG 5TANDARD5 AT 15' SPAGINO ALONG 1tfE PROPOSED fll.lfff:R BOUNDARY AS DEPICTED ON FIGURE 3. 3. ALL PLANTS SHOULD BE INSTALLED BETWEEN DECEMBER 1ST AND MARGH 15TH. 4. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL, EXl5TIN5 C.ONGRETE FOUNDATION SHALL BE REMOVED AW BACKFILLED TO EXISTING 19RADE HITH IMPORTED 3-HAY TOPSOIL. 5. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF Fl.ANT MATERIAL, ALL NON-NATIVE VEGETATION WITHIN THE ENHANCEMENT AF!EA SHALL BE !SRIJBBED (ROOTS AND GANES) BY HAND. nE5E PLANTS INGLUDE, HIMALAYAN AND EVERGREEN BL.ACKBERRY, EN6l.15H HOLLY, EN6Ll5H IVY, REED C.ANARYeRASS, THISll.E, JAFANE5E KNOTHEED, NIGHTSHADE, SCOT'S BROOM, RJRPLE L005ESTRIFE AND HEDGE BINDY'EED. AOA SHALL REVIB'li WEED REMOVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS. IMPORTED C.EDAR l9ROVE COMPOST SHALL BE BACKFILLED IN INVASIVE REMOVAL AREAS AS NEC.ESSARY TO PRE-DlSn..RBANGE oRADES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL 3' MINIMUM AND TILLED INTO THE TOP 6" OF NATIVE MATERIAL. 6. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PIT-PL.ANTED IN PLANTING PITS EXc:.AVATED 2X THE DIAMETER OF THE PLANT. PITS 5HAL.L BE B.A.GKFll.LED W.ITH A 30r10 MIX OF-6~Q.OR.GfiDAR 5ROVE COMPOST TO NATIVE SOIL. PITS SHALL BE AMENDED W.ITH A HYDRATED SOIL POLYMER (INSTAL..1..ED AT RATES PER MANJFAGTURER'S SPEG!FIGATION). PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED 2" Hl5H AND SURFACED MULCHED TO A DEPTH OF 2" V'IITH MEDIUM--G-Ol.RSE BARK MJLGH WITHIN A 24" DIAMETER RJNG AROUND EACH PLANT. BARE 5RCUND SHALL BE SEEDED i-"-IITH RED FESGUE AT 50#/AGRE. 1. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE i'lR5ERY 6R.Ow.N (IN W. HA OR OR) FOR AT LEAST I YEAR FROM A.JRGHASE DATE, FREE FROM DISEASE OR PESTS, H.ELL-R001ED, BUT NOT ROOT-BOUND AND TRUE TO SPECIES. 8. BARE-ROOT PLANTS OF EG!IJAL OR LARGER SIZE GAN BE 5UB5Tln.1TED FOR INDIAN PLUM, RED CURRENT AND ROSE Ol'-ILY. ALL OTHER PLANTS SHALL BE GONTAINER MATERIAL ct PLANT LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY ADA PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND APPROVED UPON COMPLETION OF PLANTING. 10. UPON APPROVAL OF PL.ANTING INSTALLATION BY ADA, KIN6 COUNTY HILL BE NOTIFIED TO CONDUC:.T A SITE REVIEH FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF GONSTRUGTION. 11. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS INCLUDE, I) FOLLOWING EACH MONITORING EVENT, THERE i-"-IILL BE 100% SURVIVAL RATE OF ALL PLAN1ED TREE AND SHRUB SPECIES AT YEAR I AND 85% SURVIVAL RATE FOR YEARS 2-3 OR EQUIVALENT REPLACEMENT OF A COMBINATION OF PLANTED AND RE--C.OLONIZED NATIVE SPECIES FOR YEARS 2-3. 2) AFTER C.ON.STRUGTION AND FOLLOW.INS EVERY MONITORING EVENT FOR A PERIOD OF AT LEAST THREE YE.A.RS, EXOTIC AND INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES i-"-IILL BE MAINTAINED AT LEVELS BELOW 10% TOTAL GOVER IN ALL PLANTED AREAS. THESE SPECIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; HIMALAYAN AND EVERGREEN BLACKBERRY, REED GANARYiSRA55, PURPLE L005ESTRIFE, MORNIN6 61...0RY, JAPANESE KNOTHEED, EN6Ll5H tVY, THISTLE, PERIW.INKLE, AND CREEPIN6-Nl6tffSHADE. 12. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED ON A REGULAR BASIS AGGORDING TO THE SCHEDULE BELOW. ANNUAL MAIN.TEN.ANGE SCHEDULE MAINTENANCE ITEM J F M A M J J A s 0 N D HEED CONTROL I I I I 6ENERAL MAINT. I I I I I 1-8 = NUMBER OF TIMES TASK SHALL BE PERFORMED PER MONTH. ~LGH 3" DEEP 24" DIA RINoS ROOT BALL DIAMETER SET PLANT STRAl6HT At-ID PLA(..f ROOTBALL ON SOLID eRO..tlD OR ON COHPAGTED BAGKFILL BAGKFILL PLANTING HOLE 1/2 RJU. HITH NATIVE SOIL, TAHP SOIL TO STABILIZE ROOTBALL. DO NOT DISTIJRB ROOTBALL. BAGKFILL RE"IAINING PLANTING-HOLE PER SPEGIFIGATIONS. AMEND BAGKFILL AS t-lOTEO IN THE INSTALLATION NOTES. FINJSH 6RADE. MAKE "-"E CONTAINER TREE/SHRUB PLANTIN6 DETAIL (t4p.) N.T.$ BAGKFILL A...ANTIN6 HOLE 1/2 RJLl. ~TH NATIVE SOIL, Ll6HTL'l' GOl"PAC.T SOIL Af<OI.A'ID ROOTS AND AJ..LOH HATER TO SEm...E. DO NOT LEAVE AIR PCJG.KETS. BACKFILL REMAINING PLANTING HOLE PER SPEC,.IFIGATIONS. AMEND BACKFILL AS NOTED IN Tl-£ INSTALLATION NOTES SGARJFT' SIDES OF PL.ANTlt-16 HcJLE. MN<'..E ~ HOLE HAS &::>OD DRAINAGE. FOR. BARE ROOT PLANTINe ON SLOPES, INSTAil PLANT l.f"RIGtfT ON LEYI:L SOIL TO AS=tiRE G-Ov'ER OF ROOTS ON DOl-'f',IHILL SIDE OF PLANT. C.Or-f>Ac.T SOIL UNDER ROOT HASS EXISTIN6 NATlvE SOIL. @~~RE-ROOT TREE/SHRUB PLANTIN6 DETAIL (typ.) APPROVED FOR GONSTRUG TION BY: KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT AL SERVICES DATE, - "l ~ ~ ~ n' -N () N 0- 13 P1 i ~ ii: ~ '"'Z '¢I- I.fl-< 0 ri ;z~ Oc::, .9:z: ilL ~8 26 0[L~Nt= ~~liFji 0 X: U,J #:::: WWQ__Jl-~~~~'.f r-: gu.o-:~ ~J6~~ ~~§g~ ~IHI u ! j [ ~-~ .g l !! j ~ 5 ii .€ -< ! ; m >< :I: t-1 c:, ~ ..... DEPARTMENT OF CC. ... MUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER: CONTACT: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: PLANNING DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS EVALUATION FORM & DECISION March 09, 2015 LUA15-000120 Lennon Property Critical Areas Exemption Angelea Wickstrom, Assistant Planner Patrick Lennon 35815 SE David Powell Rd Fall City, 98024 Simone Oliver, Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC PO Box 578 Carnation, WA 98014 14207 MAPLE VALLEY HWY Jennifer T. Henning Vanessa Dolbee Sabrina Mirante Angelea Wickstrom INITIAL/DATE s-<t-15 The applicant is requesting a Critical Areas Exemption in order to conduct wetland and wetland buffer enhancement activities on parcel number 2223059004. The purpose of this project is to provide off-site mitigation for impact anticipated on parcel number 3423059202 in unincorporated King County, under King County project number CAEX14-0008. King County is conducting SEPA review on project CAEX 14-0008 and is acting as lead SEPA agency. King County Department of Permitting and Environmental Review will be reviewing this off-site mitigation proposal for consistency with King County Code 21A.24. The property is 264,409 square feet, located within the Residential-14 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre Zone, and is currently vacant. The proposal is to enhance 5,110 square feet of Class 2 wetland, which runs along the southwest corner of the site, and 6,225 square feet of wetland buffer. A protected slope is present in the far southwest corner, beyond the wetland. No work is proposed within th protected slope. The work plan involves removing an existing concrete foundation and non-native vegetation from the subject areas, and planting native trees and shrubs. The applicant submitted a wetland report delineating the wetland, prepared by Raedeke Associates (February 3, 1995), and a memo confirming that conditions have not changed (Raedeke Associates, November 18, 2014). The applicant, Altmann Oliver Associates, concludes that the purpose of this plan is to enhance the structural and vegetative diversity on the site, which will lead to an increase in habitat and overall functional lift over existing Page 1 of 3 j , - CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION Applicant Name SIMONE OLIVER Parcel Number 222305-9004 Brief Description of Project: (FOR SEPA EXEMPT ACTIVITIES) Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 Project N.ame LENNON PROPERTY Project Address 14207 SE Maple Valley Hwy Phone Number 425.333.4535 The proposed project is to enhance 5,110 square feet of wetland, and 12,150 square feet of buffer. The purpose of this activity is to provide off-site mitigation for a proposed residential development in unincorporated King County. Type of Critical Area: Class 2 Wetland [8l Work Occurs in [8l Work Occurs in Critical Area Buffer PURPOSE: Exempt activities provided with a letter of exemption from the Development Services Administrator may intrude into a critical area or required buffer (Subject to any conditions or requirements provided by the Administrator). APPLICABILITY OF EXEMPTIONS: The following is a general list of activities that may be exempt from the critical areas regulations. More specific descriptions of the activities are contained in the Critical Areas Regulations. Some of the listed activities may not be exempt in certain critical areas. The Planning Division will evaluate you request according to the City of Renton Critical Areas Regulations in RMC 4-3- 0SOC, J, L, and N. I AM REQUESTING A CRITICAL AREAS EXEMPTION FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: [81 Conservation, Enhancement, and Related Activities: • Conservation or preservation of soil, water, vegetation, fish, and other wildlife • Enhancement activities as defined in chapter 4-11 RMC D1 • Any critical area, buffer restoration, or other mitigation activities that have been approved by the City D Research and Site Investigation: • Nondestructive education and research • Site Investigative work necessary for land use application submittals such as surveys, soil logs, etc. D Agrlcultural, Harvesting. and Vegetation Management: • Harvesting wlld foods C:\drawlna\3UJ0.3199\3188\dty oubmlllal\Lennon Critical Areas Exemptm Sllort Form 12~ -~--- ... • Existing/Ongoing agricultural activities 1 • Removal of dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or dangerous ground cover or hazardous trees which have been certified as such by a forester, registered landscape architect, or certified arborist D Surface Water Alteration: • New surface water discharges provided the discharge meets the requirements of the Storm and Surface Water Drainage Regulations 1 2 3 • New or modified regional storm water facilities 1 2 3 • Flood hazard reduction 1 ' 4 6 D Roads, Parks, Public and Private Utilities: • Relocation of Existing Utilities out of Critical Area and Buffer • Maintenance, operation, and repair of existing parks, trails, roads, facilities, and utilities 1 2 • Installation, construction, replacement, or operation of utilities, traffic control, and walkways within existing improved right-if-way or easement 1 2 • Modification of existing utilities and streets by 10% or less 1 2 5 • Management and essential tree removal for public or private utilities, roads and public parks 1 D Wetland Disturbance, Modification, and Removal: • Any activity in small Category 3 wetlands 1 z '• s • Temporary disturbances of a wetland due to construction activities that do not include permanent filling 1 2 3 5 D Maintenance and Construction for Existing Uses and Facilities: • Remodeling, replacing, or removing existing structures 1 2 • Normal and routine maintenance and repair of any existing public or private uses and facilities where no alteration of the critical area and required buffer or additional fill materials will be placed 1 2 • Construction activity connected with an existing single family residence or garage, provided that no portion of the new work occurs closer to the critical area or required buffers than the existing structure and/or the developed area of the site 1 2 • Existing activities which have not been changed, expanded or altered provided they comply with the applicable requirements of chapter 4-10 RMC 1 D Emergency Activities: • Removal of trees or ground cover by a City department, agency, public, or private utility in an emergency situation • Publlc interest emergency use, storage, and handllng of hazardous materials by governmental organizations In an Aquifer Protection Area ADDITIONAL PERMITS: Additional permits from other agencies may be required. It ls the appllcant's responsibility to obtain these other approvals. Information regarding these other requirements may be found at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/opas/ - I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. D Exemption Granted C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Planning Director Planning Division Conditions of Approval: 'Exemption does not apply In Aquifer Protect/on Areas 'Exemption does not apply In Flood Hazard Areas C:\drawlllll\3UJ0.3199\318ll\clty submlllal\lannotCiitlal'Ne..-Exemptlon Short Form (21.docx D Exemption Denied Date DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Planning Division LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: PATRIGKLE:NNON LENNON PROPERTY ADDRESS: 35815 SE DAVID POWELL ROAD PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Address not assigned. SE 22-23-5. 98058 CITY: FALL CITY ZIP: 98024 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 206.399.2775 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 222305,9004 APPLICANT (if other than owner) SIMONE OLIVER NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): Vacant land. Previously supported residential structures; these were removed in 2008. COMPANY (if applicable): AOA PROPOSED LAND USE(S): The proposal Is to enhance 5,110 s.f. of Class 2 waUand and 6225 s. f. of wetland buffer ADDRESS: POBOX578 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Residential, medium density CITY: CARNATION ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION 98014 (W applicable) No change proposed TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425.333.4535 EXISTING ZONING: R-14 CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A NAME: SIMONE OLIVER SITE AREA (in square feet): 264,409 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (W applicable): ADA DEDICATED: NA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: POBOX578 NA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: CARNATION ZIP: 98014 ACRE (W applicable) NA -1- C:\drawing\3100-3199\3188\city submittal\Lennon Renton LU Ap.doc 05/14 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: 425.333.4535 SIMONE@AL TOLIVER.COM . 2 - C:\drawing\3100.3199\3188\citysubmittal\Lennon Renton LU Ap.doc 05/14 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable) NA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA f PROJECT INFORMATION (continued) ,:..::c...:....:....>..::....:c..c====----------~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (ff applicable): 0 PROJECT VALUE: $15,000 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (ff applicable): 0 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (ff applicable): 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE 83,940 • SF D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (ff applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (rr applicable): 0 NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (rr applicable): O NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (rr applicable): 0 D FLOOD HAZARD AREA D GEOLOGIC HAZARD (SS) D HABITATCONSERVATION D SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES D WETLANDS 10,018" sq. ft. sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. -10 000 sq. ft. 'Estimated size based on iMao and Citv of Renton GIS maos LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I Attach leaal descrintion on senarate sheet with the followlna Information included) PAR¢gt{AQF K ,C. BOUNDARY LINE" AQ.JUSJ"fl.tql';J'r f,1()1 ~95~P'113 R8Co~.DJNG •. N095101'ir9023 BEINQLAF'QBTION OF GOVcLOT 3 IN f,JE1f4 OFSE0TJON 22--23--05L;Y SLYOF SLY LINE: OF RENTON MAPtEVALLEY HIGHWAY, SRj§~, ANDPORTlONOF NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT FORCEDARWOODPu•o AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Namels, SIMONE OLIVER, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) __ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _x_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are II respects d correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . .:2-.14-IS Date Signature of Owner/Representative STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that s 'M6V\L Ol "ivw signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instn.Jment. -3- C:\drawing\3100-3199\3188\city submittal\lennon Renton LU Ap.do~ 05/14 2/9/15 Date Dated Notary (Print): & rl(;(, LVnne-l&eJa <:tJe@//' My appointment expires:_,_/,_/-_;)=-:;)::_-_,_!__,,{£"'-------------- -4- . CM!~~j_n~3Jq0-3199\318B\city submittal\Lennon Renton _LU_Ap.t;_l_pi:; -.• ,, -·. • a.·a ·> 05/14 . , ·'' KERRIE LYNNE ROETCISOENDER Notary Public State of Washington My Commission Expires November 22, 2016 ' ' 24 February 2015 35815 SE David Powell Road Fall City WA 98024 Angelea Wickstrom City of Renton Subject: 14207 Maple Valley Hwy Critical Areas Exemption By this letter Simone Oliver is appointed the authorized representative of Cedar River Lightfoot, Patrick Lennon, and Cedar Wood Group as it relates to the Master Application for the Critical Areas Exemption. Cedar River Lightfoot Patrick Lennon i¥ :e: < Cedar Wood Group j' I PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SU BM ITT AL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Applicant Agreement Statement •AND 3 Inventory of Exls1ing Sites 2 ANO• Lease Agreement, Draft <AND, Map of Existing Site Conditions UN:> 3 Map ofView Area,2 A111>3 Photos!mulallons. 2AND3 • PLANNING DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS This niqUltilrneht may bQ WII~ by: 1. Property Service& . 2; PubllCWorlc4 Plan Revi&W .3; Bulfd!J1g 4.Plannlng .edeke -\,-..r,cl.itc,, lnr. December 15, 2014 Mr. Glen Mauer Pacific Properties, Inc. 14410 Bel-Red Road, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98007 RE: Elliot Farm -Wetland Delineation RA.I. Project #2012-024-002 Dear Glen: Wetland & Aquatic Sciences ,vildlife Ecology Landscape Architecture At your request, we conducted a site investigation on June 26 and 27, 2012 to determine whether wetlands and streams were present on the Elliot Farm property. PROPERTY LOCATION The Elliot Farm property consists of an approximately 6-acre parcel, located along the south side of SR 169 (Renton-Maple Valley Highway), approximately 1,000 feet east of 140th Way SE, in the City of Renton, Washington. The property is identified as Tax Parcel No. 2223059004. This places the property in a portion of Section 22, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Parcel maps retrieved on-line from King County (2012) iMAP depict the property boundaries. METHODOLOGY In order to identify potential wetland areas, we used the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987). The COE, which requires use of the 1987 delineation manual, as amended, has federal regulatory jurisdiction of the dredging or filling of "Waters of the United States," including wetlands. As outlined in this methodology, the interaction ofhydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland hydrology must be present for an area to be classified as wetland. To be consistent with current regulations, field investigations were consistent with the Regioual Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (COE 2010). BACKGROUND REVIEW Prior to conducting our site reconnaissance, we reviewed existing background mapa and information from the U.S.D.A Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS 2014) Web Soil Survey and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USFWS 2014) National Wetland Inventory (NWI). 9510 Stone Avenue N. Seattle, WA 98108 206-525-8 Hl!I www.raedeke.com Mr. Glen Mauer December 15, 2014 Page2 The USDA NRCS (2014) Web Soil Survey shows the majority of the study area as an Newberg series soil. Newberg series soil is not considered a hydric soil (USDA Soil Conservation Service 1991 Federal Register 1995). Soil series boundaries or mapping units are mapped from aerial photographs with limited field verification. Thus, the location and extent of the boundaries between mapping units may be approximate for a given parcel of land within the survey area. The USFWS (2014) NWI does not depict wetlands on or within the immediate vicinity of the study area. Wetlands shown on the NWI are general in terms oflocations and extent, as they are determined primarily from aerial photograph interpretation. Thus, the number and extent of existing wetlands located within the project area may differ from those marked on an NWI map. RESULTS During our site visit on June 26 and 27, 2012 we identified and delineated the boundary of a wetland located in the southwest portion of the Elliot Farm property (Figure 2). The wetland is a low-lying forested area in the southwest portion of the site. Vegetation in the wetland area is comprised of a red alder (A/nus rubra, FAC) canopy over a salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis, FAC) and Himalayn blackberry (Rubus armeniancus, F ACU) shrub layer. Field horsetail (Equisetum arvense, FAC) and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens, FAC) are the dominant species identified in the herbaceous layer (Sample Plots 2 and 4, Appendix A). The majority of the species observed are rated facultative or wetter (Reed 1988), so the vegetation community would be considered hydrophytic, per the COE (2010) guidelines. Soils observed in the wetland are very dark grayish brown (lOYR 3/2) silt loam over gray (IOYR 5/1) and dark grayish brown (lOYR 4/2) silt loams. The deeper soil profiles exhibited many redoximorphic features (mottles). Dark soils with mottles are positive indicators ofhydric (wetland) soils per the COE (2010) guidelines. We encountered a water table at 18 inches below the ground surface during our June 2012 field investigations, and soils were saturated at a depth of 12 inches. These are considered positive indicators of wetland hydrology We did not identify any wetlands or critical areas in the remaining portion of the property. In general the property consists of previously cleared and graded areas that now support a vegetation community dominated by invasive plant species such as Himalayan blackberry and Scot's Broom (Cytisus scoparius, UPL) and included small stands of red alder and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera, FAC). Soils observed in the central portion of the site were bright (lOYR 5/4) fine sandy loams. No hydrology was observed within 18 inches of the ground surface (Sample plots 1, 3, and 5; Appendix A). Mr. Glen Mauer December 15, 2014 Page3 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS Wetlands and streams are protected by Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act and other state and local policies and ordinances, including City of Renton (2014b) municipal code. Regulatory considerations pertinent to wetlands identified within the study area are discussed below; this discussion, however, should not be considered comprehensive. Additional information may be obtained from agencies with jurisdictional responsibility for, or interest in, the site. A brief review of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Washington regulations and of the City of Renton municipal code, relative to wetlands and streams, is presented below. Federal Clean Water Act (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) In general, Federal law (Section 404 of the Clean Water Act) discourages the discharge of dredged or fill material into the nation's waters, including most wetlands and streams, without a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Certain wetlands, including many that are hydrologically isolated from "waters of the United States," may not be regulated by the COE. The COE has the authority to make a final determination concerning whether an area(!) meets the definition of"waters of the United States" as defined by the federal government (Federal Register 1986:41251) and (2) is under federal jurisdiction. State of Washington The Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) regulates all wetlands as 'waters of the State" under Chapter 90.48 RCW (Water Pollution Control), including isolated wetlands determined to be non-jurisdictional by the COE. In addition, activities that will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any state waters must be approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), through its administration of the State Hydraulic Code (RCW 75.20.100-140). City of Renton The City of Renton (2014b) municipal code currently regulates wetlands and streams under Title IV, Chapter 3 -"Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts." Alterations of wetlands or streams and their buffers are generally prohibited, except as allowed under certain conditions specified in RMC Title IV. The City of Renton (2014) code specifies ratings, buffers, and allowed uses of wetlands and other sensitive areas that are under it's jurisdiction. The wetland identified on the Elliot Farm property appears to meet the City of Renton criteria necessary to be considered a Category 2 system because it is not a Category I or 3 wetland. In order to be a Category 1 wetland the feature must contain habitat for listed species of wildlife or plants, contain 40% to 60% open water and two or more vegetation classes, or be greater than 10 acres in size with three or more vegetation classes. No Mr. Glen Mauer December 15, 2014 Page4 species listed as endangered or threatened, or other priority species were observed during our field investigationa, nor are any mapped for the site by WDFW (2014). Category 3 wetlands are those that have been severely disturbed by human activities or are newly emerging with little vegetation diversity. The wetland on the Elliot Farm site does not meet either the Category 1 or Category 3 criteria and therefore meets the City ofRenton's criteria as a Category 2 wetland. Under the City of Renton code, Category 2 wetlands are provided with a standard buffer width of 50 feet. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for the exclusive use of the Pacific Properties, Inc. and their consultants. No other person or agency may rely upon the information, analysis, or conclusions contained herein without permission from Pacific Properties, Inc. The determination of ecological system classifications, functions, values, and boundaries is an inexact science, and different individuals and agencies may reach different conclusions. With regard to wetlands, the final determination of their boundaries for regulatory purposes is the responsibility of the various resource agencies that regulate development activities in wetlands. We cannot guarantee the outcome of such agency determinations. Therefore, the conclusions of this report should be reviewed by the appropriate regulatory agencies prior to any detailed site planning or construction activities. We warrant that the work performed conforms to standards generally accepted in our field, and that this work was prepared substantially in accordance with then-current technical guidelines and criteria. The conclusions of this report represent the results of our analysis of the information provided by the project proponents and their consultants, together with information gathered in the course of this study. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this material for you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call us at (206) 525-8122. Respectfully submitted, RAEDEKE ASSOCIATES, INC. ffu IJ 4-- Christopher W. Wright, Principal Soil and Wetland Scientist Mr. Glen Mauer December 15, 2014 Page 5 LITERATURE CITED Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Anny Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 100 pp. Federal Register. 1986. 40 CFR Parts 320 through 330: Regulatory programs of the Corps of Engineers; final rule. Vol. 51. No. 219. pp. 41206-41260, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Federal Register. 1995. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service: Changes inHydric Soils of the United States. Volume 59, No 133, July 13, 1994. Revised September 15, 1995. King County. 2012. iMAP GIS Interactive map center, King County, Washington. http://www.metrokc.gov/gis/iMAP _main.htm#. Accessed June 2012. Renton, City of. 2014. 4-3-050, Critical Areas Regulations, Title IV, Chapter 3 - Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts. Renton Municipal Code online through Code Publishing Company, Seattle, WA. Current through Ordinance 5707, passed March 24, 2014. www.codepublishing.com/wa/renton/ Accessed November, 2014. U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual: western mountains, valleys, and coast region (Version 2.0). Wakeley, J.S., R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble, eds. May 2010. ERDC/EL TR-10-3. U.S. Anny Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS. U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service. 1991. Hydric soils of the United States: In cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. U.S.D.A. Miscellaneous Publication Number 1491. U.S.D.A. Natnral Resources Conservation Service. 2014. On-line Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed November, 2014. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014. National Wetland Inventory, Wetlands Online Mapper. http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html • Accessed November, 2014. PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 1 REGIONAL & VICINITY MAP ELLIOT FARM RENTON.WA 8iedeke A:-.,;w·i;ne-, l , .. -. ~7.lll•:. i,,.'\!i.'>:{,_j -~ . ,. z ,, 0 .. ~ ~ LU NZ LU ::J ~ C:: LU => 0 , !:2 0 ~ u.. z • :'.S • I- LU 3: ::,; :, z :ii 0"' QO, ZI Ost "., """ i:j"' "'\i "0.. ' . 0 ffi zg=~ " . ., . ti:! b I I ~u~ ,". - l•.i i II 1jl! I I! 1,11 ·1 I· "' t I I 1ll' 1) ;I . 'r1 '1 i·i 1!,lil !; !II , , ,' l!i '• ~I ' ,, ' ' \ ,/ ,;---- ..t>,--f/' <If!~·~;;:"" __ ...,. ' r---/ ! /r~ _____ JI- ' APPENDIX A FIELD DATA FORMS WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: .sElwlioo,ttl.Jfl:i"ICUDW.. ______________ ,City/County: King County Sampling Date:June 27 2012 Applicant/Owner: ~Mn.YllWlll:Yl'..:·CJfCW"llOk~IY~DL..-------------------State: "W,.A,_ ___ Sampling Point ,,Sr::P.:,_1 __ _ lnvesUgator{s): Cbds Wdaht Emmett Pritchard Section, Township, Range: S22 T23N RSE W M landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): cHwill!§JSl!Qo.,,pe,_ ________ Local relief (concave, convex, none): ,..Co,,nwvo;ex"'-----Slope(%): _2 __ Subregion (LRR): Northwest forests & coasts fLRB-Al Lat: 47 466510 Long: -122 151222 Datum: unknown Soil Map Unit Name: Newbern silt loam NWI classification: uno..,n,,e'--------- Are climatic:/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes 181 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation_. Soil--· or Hydrology __ significantly disturbed? Are ~Normal Circumstances'" present? Yes D No 181 Are Vegetation_. Soil_. or Hydrology __ naturalty problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophyllc Vegetation Present? Yeo 181 NoO lo tho Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? YeoD No 181 within • Wetland? YeoO No 181 Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye•D No 181 Remarks: Sample Plot 1 lo located outside d the wetland, near wetland boundary flag WL-2A. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 5m radius) %Cover SDBCies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Ibuil 121g11 t>.NeSt9m arbonrudal 10 y_ f&.._ That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: A (A) 2. e.miersm. 5 NL__ &__ Total Number of Dominant 3. ------Species Across All Strata: • (B) 4. ------Percent of Dominant Species 15 = Total Cover ThatAreOBL, FACW,orFAC: !HI (A/B) SaoHnq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3m radius) 1. Bubu§ iUlll§Di~S U:lim111li1Xi1D ~~!;mm:} 70 y_ UClL Prevalence Index worksheet 2. Illull Wliilliil tv.l'A!dm:n s1rborvlalll 5 Ii..__ f&.._ !21al % Cover g{' Mutl112~ bx· 3. llallan mum 5 NL__ .tlA__ OBLspecies x1= 4. FACW species x2= ------ 5. ------FACspecies x3- !HI = Total Cover FACU species x4= Herb S11:11Um {Plot size: 1 m [iH~IU!:i) UPL species x5= 1. Eautal!.lm aa1Da (!mid horsatall) 20 y_ f&.._ Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Ranunculu9 reoens (creeping tx,rtterpyp) 10 y_ f&.._ 3. ebill1cll 1ruDSi1loa1 (mml ~narvaCHI) 10 y_ Ee&Yi.... Prevalence Index = BIA - 4. mum.Ism !HI NL__ .tlA__ Hydrophytlc VegetaUon Indicators: 5. 0 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytlc Vegetation ------ 8. 181 2 -Dominance Test lo >50% ------ 7. D 3 -Prevalence Index lo <3.01 ------ 8. D 4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting ------data In Remarks or on a -"'8 sheet) 9. ------D 5 -WeUand Non-Vascular Plants' 10. ------D Problematic Hydrophytlc Vegetation' (Explul) 11. ------'Indicators d hydric soil and wetland hy<lrology must 100 = Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Wgody \Ana Stratum (Plot size: 3m radius) 1. ------Hydrophytlc 2. ------Vegetation Q •Tcta1Co"81' Praoent? Y•181 NoO % Bare G"""1d In Herb Stretum 10 ---·-. Remarks: Vartoua mosses"""' obselvad In the herb llratum. Musel apecles"""' not readily ldentlflable and therefore_. not relied er, as an wetland Indicator for Ullo survey. us Anny Corps d EnginHnl Western MotJntalns, Yalleys, and Coast -Varolon 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point .s..e.:i__ Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or conflnn the absence of Indicators.) Depth Mind! R~Q~ E§alurn (in,tml ~IQr (mgj:51} __jL_ QQIQr (mQi!5U _____%_ .IYlHL. ....L2!L.. T~II.G R§msl[1s!5 O::lQ lQl'.B :112 ----Sill LQiUD l O::l fl+ lQYB fil ----~ill !..Qam ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 1T··--: C=Concentration D=Denletlon RM-Reduced Matrix CS-Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: Pl=Pore Uni..,, M-Matrix. Hyd~c Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problamatlc Hydrlc Sons": 0 Hlstosol (A1) 0 Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) 0 Hlstlc Eplpedon (A2) 0 Slripped Matrix (S6) D Rad Parent Material (TF2) D Black Histic (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (ex capt MLRA 1) D Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) D Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyad Matrix (F2) D other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Thick Dark Surface (A 12) D Radox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytlc vegetation and 0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) 0 Dapletad Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 0 Sandy Gleyad Matrix (S4) D Radox Depressions (FB) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive l.al/81' (If present): Type: Dapth (Inches): Hyd~c Soll Prasent? Yao0 No 181 Remarks: HYDROLOGY waaanc1 Hydrology lndlcaton: ertmaa lad&i:11'0 (minimum m Wll rm:auitm1· ~ 111 Ibid 1112b:l ~.gad1i:x l1K11cators (2 m: mnrA mm1imdl D Surface Water (A1) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (axcapt MLRA D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 0 High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 411) 4A, and 411) D Saturation (A3) 0 Sa1tCrust(B11) D Drainage Patterns (B10) 0 Water Marks (B1) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) 0 Dry-season Water Table (C2) 0 Sediment Deposlts (B2) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drill Deposits (B3) D Oxidized Rhlzospheres along Umg Roots (C3) 0 Geomorphlc Position (02) D Algal Mat or Crust (B4) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard (03) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent lroo Reduction In TIiied Soils (C6) 0 FAC-Neutral Test (05) 0 Surface Soil Cracks (BB) 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LRR A) 0 Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) 0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D Dlher (Explain In Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (07) 0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Fleld Dblerwtlons: &..race Water Present? YaoO No 181 Depth Onchesr, Water Table Present? YaoO Nollll Depth Onches): Saturation Present? YaoD No181 Depth Onches): -Hydrology P...-it? YaoO No181 /Includes --laN -· Descrlba Recorded Data ca1ream gauge, monitoring-. aer1a1 p11o1o1, prav1ous Inspections), r avai-= Ranllb: No evidence of surface -was observed. Soils -nol aaturated and no water 1able was present to a depth of 18 lnc/les. --·. - Waotem Mountains, Valleys, and eo..t-Van,ion 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: tEJUJli!!lgtltucfaillUDlll. ______________ ,City/County: nKillin,.g-"Co"""unwjy:,_ _______ Sampling Date:June 27 2012 Applicant/Owner. J:iMll!Yl!C@~Y!:-ftl@lllDIOk!!IY!!DL....-------------------State: :,,Wi.cA._ ___ Sampling Point: ~s~P-~2~-- lnvestigator(s): Chris Wdoht Emmett Pritchard Section, Township, Range: S22 T23N RSE W.M Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ~De-preg.,..si.,·o._nL-_______ Local relief (concave, convex, none): ~Co~n~ca=ve~----Slope(%): _O __ Subregion (LRR): Northwest forests & coasts {LRR-Al Lat: 47.4§6269 Long:-122149914 Datum: unknown Soil Map Unit Name: JlNi!!ewbeml!iJ:'911..liJSiW.IIJlloalll!IroL.... ___________________ NWI classification: uno~o~e~------ Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes C8J No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation____. Soil __ , or Hydrology __ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances· present? Yes D No C8J Are Vegetation _, Soil _. or Hydrology __ naturally problematic? (If needed, explcin any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 181 NoD Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soll Present? Yes 181 NoD within a Wetland? Yes 181 NoD WeUand Hydrology Present? Yes 181 NoD Remarks: Sample Plot 2 ls localed in wettand, near-and flag WL-9A. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratun (Rot size: 5m radius> %Cover Species? ...SJll\!L Number of Dominant Species 1. alDIII Dlbm imd iildacl 30 )'.__ fAQ_ Thal "'8 DBL, FAON, or FAC: • (A) 2. ------Total Number of Dominant 3. ------Species Across All Strata: • (B) 4. ------Percent of Dominant Species 30 = Total Cover Thal "'8 DBL, FAON. or FAC: ~ (A/B) SaQIIOQlSl:la.ib Stmwm (Plot size: 3m radius) 1. BYbYa flnnAniiKa.11 U::lim1li1:ai1D bliliikb:a!Dt'.l 2Q )'.__ ~ Prevalance lndax worlcsh- 2. Rubus cNM •1bllll (elmml m~bem:l 2Q )'.__ fAQ_ !2lill ~ ~SU Q(' Mulli12~ trt· 3. DBL species x1------- 4. ------FAON species x2= 5. ------FACspecies x3= ~ = Total Cover FACU species x4= 11em Stratum (Plot size: Jm llWh1:1> UPL species x5= 1. t;gu1setum 1rlllla Cfilld horsatalll ~Q )'.__ fAQ_ Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. RanuOCYlus repens (geeQing buttercup) 20 )'.__ fAQ_ 3. Athvr11,1m 0111:fmDIWI 'lldlr: bmll 2Q )'.__ fAQ_ Prevalence Index = BIA = 4. Hydrophytlc Veg-or, lndlcaton: ------ 5. ------0 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrop/lyllc Vegetation 6. 181 2 -Dominance Test la >50% ------ 7. D 3 -Prevalence Index 11 ~.01 ------ D 4 • Molphologlcal Adaptations 1 (Provide supporting 8. ------data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. ------0 5-Welland Non-VasaJlar Plants' 10. ------D Problemallc Hym,phyllc Vegetation' (Explain) 11. ------11ndlcaton! of hydrlc soil and wetland hydrology must 80 = Total Cover be present, unless dJstwbed or problematic. Wogdy Yloo Stratum (Pict size: 3m radius) 1. ------Hydrophytlc: 2. ------Veg-or, Q •TotalC-PIN8fll? Y•i81 NoO % Bare Ground In Herb Stratum Q ----- . Westam Mcurtan, vatleys, and Coast-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point:~ Proflte Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or conflm, the absence of Indicators.) Depth Mal~ R!i@x F~s!l!.!~ !ID!:im!li) CQIQ[ (!llQi~) ___%_ QQIQ[ (mgj:n) _'L_ ~ ....L2fL T~Wm R!iHDsUkli !l:l! 1QYR :l/2 ----SHI Loam ~-12 lllYB iill w___ 1QYR4M 2Q__L_ M.___ Silt Loam j2-111+ 1QYB 412 @.__ lQYB 4(4 &___L_ M.___ Sandv Loam ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 1T"-: C=Concentration D=Denletion RM=Reduced Matrix CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Locatlon: PL -Pore Uni""-M-Matrix. Hydrfc Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators lo, Problematic Hydrfc Soils': 0 Hlstosol (A 1) 0 Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) 0 Hlstlc Epipedon (A2) D Stripped Mab'ix (S6) D Rad Parent Matenal (TF2) 0 Black Hlstlc (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyad Mab'ix (F2) D Olller (Explain In Remarks) D Depleted Below Dark Surlaca (A 11) 181 Depletad Mab'ix (F3) D Thick Dark Surface (A12) D Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Depletad Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 0 Sandy Gleyad Mab'ix (S4) D Radox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type Depth (Inches): Hydrfc Soll P1Nent? Yes 181 NoO Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: eamaa lmlAWCi imiolmum m m:J1 mm.11rm1· ch8ck all Ibid alml)'.l fiAl'.OrldaD: ladlf.atlTil C2 m: mora cmwlmdl 0 SurlacaW-(A1) 0 Watar-Stainad Leaves (B9) (except MLRA D Walef-Stalnad Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 181 High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 4A, and 48) 181 Saturation (A3) 0 SaltCrust(B11) D Drainage Patterns (B10) 0 W-Marks(B1) D Aquatic lnverfebrales (813) 0 Dry-5eason W-Table (C2) D Sediment Deposits (B21 0 Hydrogen Sulfkle Odor (C1) D Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drift Deposits (B3l D Oxidizad Rhizospheres aor,g LM1g Roots (C3) 0 Geomorphic Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (B4l 0 Presence of Raducad Iron (C4) D Shallow Aquitard (03) D Iron Deposits (B5) D Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (C6) 0 FAG-Neutral Test (05) D s..race Soil Creeks (B6l 0 Stuntad or Stressed Plants (01) (LRR A) 0 Ralsad Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) 0 Inundation Visible on Aetlal Imagery (B7) D other (Explain In Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (07) 0 Spersely Vegetatad Concave Surface (B6) Flald o-..u .... , Surface w-Present? YesO No181 Depth (inches): W-T-Present? Yesilsl No0 Depth (Inches): 1§_ -Present? 'lnctooes:.:.~;;:..:.:: flt---· Yes181 NoO Depth (Inches): 12..._ -Hydrology PINenl? Yes 181 No0 Deecrlbe Racordad Data (stream gauge, monil<>rlng we1, aerta1 photos, pnw1oua 1nspec11onai r available: Ramarb: Solll become saturalad at 12 i1chel and a water_ II prment at 18 lnchee. --- WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region ProjecVSite: ,E.wm,.ott.._,_Fa.,rm.llL ______________ .City/County: King County Sampling Date:June 27 2012 Applicant/Owner: r,M!l!Y!!J!Bo,Y<:.·Eti@:l!!!!nk"lve:nL--------------------State: ..,WucA._ ___ Sampling Point: ,,S,_P-o.3c.._ __ lnvestigator(s): Chris Wright Emmett Prttchard Section, Township, Range: S22 I23N R5E W.M Lanctform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): "H.,ill,,sl,.ooe""----------Local relief (concave, convex. none): ,,,c"'oowv"'e"'x _____ Slope(%): _2 __ Subregion (LRR): Northwest forests & coasts {LBR-Al Lat: 47.465922 Long: -122 149948 Datum: unknown Soil Map Unit Name: Newberg silt loam NWI classification: uOOWIOJSQ'------- Are dimatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for ttiis time of year? Yes 181 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation___, Soil __ , or Hydrology __ significanUy disturbed? Are MNormal Circumstances· present? Yes D No 181 Are Vegetation_. Soil_, or Hydrology __ naturally problemalic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? YesD No Cill la tha Sampled Area Hydric Soll Present? Yes Cill NoD within a Wetland? YesD NoCill WeUand Hydrology Present? YesO No Cill Remar1<s: Sample Plot 3 ls located outside of the wetland, near wetland boundary flag (WL-9A). VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size; Sm radius> %Cover Specjes? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Tl1at Are OBL, FAOIV, or FAC: 1 (A) ------ 2. ------Total Number of Dominant 3. ------Species Across All Strala: ? (B) 4. ------Percent of Dominant Species 0 = Total Cover Tl1at Are OBL, FAOIV, or FAC: liP (A/B) SimllmlG:tbmb Stratun (Plot size: 3m radius) 1. Bubus arrn&nlag m Ct:llmamaa bli~benvl SP y__~ Prevalence Index worksheet 2. Total% Cgyerof· MuW12I~ Ill' ------ 3. ------0Blspecles x1= 4. ------FAOIV species x2= 5. ---FACspecles 20 x3=60 SP = Total Cover FACU species llll x4=~ZD Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1rn radius) UPL species x5- 1. EauiBtum aCdlla llmld horsetail} 20 y__ E6C..._ Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. --- 3. ---Prevalence Index =BIA= 3J!. 4. ---Hydrophytlc V~on Indicators: 5. ---0 1 • Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegelatlon 8. ---D 2 • Dominance Test Is >50% 7. ---D 3-Prevalence Index Is "3.01 8. ---0 4-Morphcloglcal Adaplations1 (Provide supponlng da1a In Remarks or on a sepa--) 9. ---0 5-W-nd Non-Vascular Planla1 10. ---D -.a11c Hydrophylic vege1auon 1 (Explain) 11. ---1 lndk:alors d hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 20 = Total Cover be present. unless disturbed or problemallc. Woody 1/J[Je SJrabpn (Plot s1ze: 3m radius) 1. ---Hydropltytlc 2. -V~on 0 • Total Cover P1'8Nnt? v .. o No181 % Bare Gro<.nd In Herb Slra!Um 0 .. Remarks: Western McunlaJne, Yalleya, and Coast-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: .s.e:a__ Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Maid! R~~E§ii!l!.!cn (ia~btsl QQl2c (m2isU _J,__ QQIQr (!DQISll ____%_ ~ ~ Tu~!.R Beman<~ 0-9 10VB 3/2 ----Silt Loam li:1J 1oyB ~2 llL_ JQYB41J L___L_ _M __ Sill Loam 1a:1u+ 1[:(B ~a ----Sandy Loam ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 1T·--: C=Concentration D= RM=Reduced Matrix CS-Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linino. M=Matrlx. Hydrlc Soll Indicators: (Appllcablo to all LRRa, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solls1: 0 Histosol (A 1) 0 Sandy Reoox (SS) D 2 cm Muck (A10) 0 Histlc Epipedon (A2) 0 Stripped Matrix (S6) 0 Red Parent Material (TF2) 0 Black Histic (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) D Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) D Other (Explain in Remarks) D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) 181 Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Thick Dark Surface (A12) 0 Redox Dark Surface (F6) 31ndlcatOB of hydrophytlc vegetation and 0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) 0 Redox Deprasslons (F8) unless disturbed or ~ematic. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Depth Qnches): Hydrlc Soll Present? Y• 181 NoO Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wolland Hydrology Indicators: eamaa lmii:ill12CE ,m1a1mum at u 1Jmu1m1· ~ all llll1 am2b:l Second11:x 1m1gim (2 m:: more amuirmJl D SurfaceWator(A1) D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (excapt MLRA D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 0 High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, ,A, and '8) 'A. and '8) D Saturation (A3l D sancrust(B11) D Drainage Patterns (B10) 0 Water Marka (B1) 0 Aquatlclnvortebrates(B13) 0 Dry-5eason Water Table (C2) 0 Sediment Deposits (B2) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Ae~al Imagery (C9) D Drift Deposits (B3) D Oxidized Rhlzospheres a1ong Umg Roots (C3) 0 Geomorphlc Position (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (B4) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Shallow Aquitard (03) 0 Iron Deposits (BS) D Recent Iron Reduction In Tdled Soils (C6) 0 FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 0 Surface Soll Cracko (B6) 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LRR A) 0 Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) D Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D Other (Explain 1n Ramarka) D Frost-Heava Hummocka (07) D Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B6) Fletd em..atlono: SUrfaca Water Present? YesO No~ Depth Qnches): Water Table Present? YesO No~ Depth Qnches): Saturallon Present? YNO No181 Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? YNO No~ 1---1a .. 1r1-h' Describe Recorded Data (stream -· monitoring wel, aerial pholoo, previous Inspections), I available: Ramarka: No evidence of lour-.--· Sol sallralad -notobaerved and no aparant ---present within the-18 Inches of the soil profile. ' -. US Anny Corpo of Engineers Western Mountains, Yalleyl, and Co811-Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region ProjecUSite: ~EJ1JUi111.ott=F•.,UD!!L ______________ ,City/County: nK'"in,.a.,.c"'o"unl!ltyL--------Sampling Date:,June 27 2012 Applicant/Owner. o:M"'u"rra"'y,c-Fc,ra ..... nk"IYuDL--------------------State: ...,Wu::Ac_ ___ Sampling Point: ,aS,:P.::,4'--- lnvestigator{s): Chris Wrioht Emmett Pritchard Section, Township, Range: $22 T23N R5E W M Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): .. pe,.o..,re.,.s.,s.,ig.,_nL-_______ Local relief (concave, convex, none): ,.,Co,.nca""""'ve._ ____ Slope(%): .Q_ Subregion (LRR}: Northwest forests & coasts {LRR-A) Lat: 47 466269 Long: -122 149914 Datum: unknown Soil Map Unit Name: Newberg siH loam NWI classification: 1.1no"'n,.eL-_____ _ Are dlmatic I hydrologlcconditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 181 No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation___, Soil __ , or Hydrology __ significantty disturbed? Are &Normal Circumstances" present? Yes D No 18] Ale Vegetation ~ Soil ~ or Hydrology __ narurally problematic? {If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampllng point locatlons, transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetatioo Present? Yes 181 NoD lo tho Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes 181 NoD within a Wetland? Yes181 NoD Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 181 NoD Remarks: Sample Plot 4 ls located in a peulstrine. forested oommunily neer weUand boundary flag (WL-7A). VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: Sm radius) %Cover Species? --8lilllL Number of Dominant Species 1. e.lDl~I Dltml (mj illdiii:l !lll y__ fAC.._ Tha1 Ara OBL, FAON, or FAC: s (A) 2. Jhuta o11cata /western arborvlalel 20 y__ fAC.._ Total Number of Dominant 3. ------Species Across All Sbata: s (B) 4. ------Percent of Dominant Species 100 = Tolal Cover Thal Ale OBL, FAON. or FAC: 100 (NB) SamlDQlStn:ub StrllUm (Plot size: 3m radius) 1. Bum.Ii s~ab:ilil {alm!21l m~a:xl 1g y__ fAC.._ Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. ltmi; agulf2Hum £fmalllb bal~l ~ N....__ .E/IClL !mill ~ Co\18f' gf· MulUQ~ bl· 3. OBLspecies x1= ------ 4. ------FAONspecies x2= 5. ------FACspecles X3• 1:i = Total Cover FACU species x4= Herb ~CIIUW (Plot size: 1 m radius> UPL species x5= 1. Sgj121.11 microcacm.u1 (b!.IIBl&bl ;io y__ QW.___ Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Ranunculus repens (creeping buttercuo> ;io y__ fAC.._ 3. LvsichiWIJ lmericalJll (l~ll[d5 Sdlbbil!iml 10 N....__ QW.___ Prevalence lndeX = BIA = 4. A1trai1.1m tllm:lmnla1 {lm:b: fm:nl JO N....__ fAC.._ Hydrophytlc Vegetation lndlc:ators: 5. Veron~ b§g;at!!Jaga ,1;11rooeao 1peedweR) JO N....__ QW.___ D 1 • Rapid Test for Hym,phyllc Vegetatioo 8. !Qlmla menzlmll (piggy-bag~ 1211Dll ~ _N __ fAC.._ 181 2 -Dominance Test la >50% 7. L!r::tkil dlgg (mloglag Ddll) ~ N....__ fAC.._ D 3 -Prevalence Index lo "3.01 8. ~lvcerla AlatA aatl rnana gr.aa) • N....__ f/!&W._ D 4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 9. dala In Remarks or on a separate sheet) ------D 5-WeUand Non-Vascular Plants' 10. ------D Problematic Hym,phyllc Vegelallon 1 (Explain) 11. ------11ndlcafonl ol hydrlc soil and -hydrology must 191 • Total Cover be present. unless disturbed or ~alk:-Woodv ~oa S1rarum CPlcl s1ze: 3ro lll!lhw 1. ------lfydropllytlc 2. ----Veg- 0 • Total Cover Preoent? Y• illl NoD % Bare Ground In Herb Stratum ll -~------- Remarks: -.· ... - US Anny Corps d Englneeno Weslam Mountains, Valleys, and Coul-Vnlon 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point:~ Proflla Dasa1ptlon: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or conflnn the absence of Indicators.) Depth Mi!lrix Redox E!il:ll!lur= (im;;b~l !;gig[ (IIl2i~l _j',_ Cgia[ £m2i:a! _jL ~ ..JJ2L_ IgK!u~ R!li!mi!cls~ Q:1/l+ ]Q:iB all ----Mycky Peat ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 1T"""": C=Concentration 0=na.-.1euon RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Locatlon: PL -Pore Uni ...... M=Matrix. Hydrfc Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise notad.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrfc Solis': 181 Hlslosol (A1) 0 Sandy Redox (S5) D 2 cm Muck (A10) 0 H-Epipedon (A2) 0 Slripped Matrix (S6) D Rad Parent Material (TF2) 0 Black Hlsllc (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Minarol (F1) (axcepl MLRA 1) D Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyad Matrix (F2) D Other (Explain In Remarks) D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) 181 Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Thick Dark Surface (A 12) D Radox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophyllc vegetation and 0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) D Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 0 Sandy Gleyad Matrix (54) D Radox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layar (If present): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydric Soll Pn,eent? Yes 181 NoO Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetiand Hydrology Indicators: ertmrH:X Indicators {miaimum gt Q[l§ mm.ilred· check Dll lbll ilm.ilxl ~dil~ IIBJ"511Q!I £2 IX mora mm.llmdl 181 Surface Water (A1) D Water-Slalnad Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 0 Water-Slalnad Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 181 High Water Tabla (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 4A, and48) 181 Saturation (A3) 0 SaltCrust(B11) D Drainage Patterns (B10) 0 WaterMarks(B1) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) 0 Dry-season Water Table (C2) 0 Sadlrnant Deposits (B2) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) D Drift Deposits (B3l D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Llmg Roots (C3) 0 Geomorphlc Pcsillon (D2) D Algal Mat or Crust (B4) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Shallow Aquitard (D3) 0 Iron Deposits (B5) 0 Recant Iron Reduction In TIiied Solis (C6) 0 FAC-Neutrat Test (D5) 0 Surface Sol Cracks (B6) 0 Stunted or Strassad Plants (D1) (LRR A) 0 Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) 0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D Other (Explain 1n Remarks) D Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) 0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B6) Fleld OIIHMlllons: Surface W-Present? Yas181 NoO Depth Onchas): 3• W-T-Pn,senl? Yas181 No0 Dapth Onchas): JL_ Saturation Prasant? , lncludas ce .... :.:.. fri···' Yas181 NoO Depth (lnchas): JL_ -nd Hydrology Prnenl? YN181 No0 Describe Racordad Dala (stream gauge, monitoring wel, &ellal photoe, pravlou8 Inspections), W evallable: Remarks: Soils are saturated to the surfaca, and saveral 100 ~ pools approxlmateley 3 lnchell deep are located adjacent lo the sample plot A 24 lncll wlda stream channel J• -ng to the west. ·~ .... -:···· _., ·~ -- US Nfl'l'f Corps of Engineers Waslem Mountalnl, Valleys, and Coast-V-2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: ~E.w1Ji~9U11J:Fa111UDl!L ______________ ,City/County: Kina County Sampling Date:June 27 2012 Applicant/Owner. oM"-Ulll"'lllYY:·r.F@@ll!Okll!IYY!nL ___________________ State:.,_W.,A,._ ___ Sampling Point: .zSJ:CP-:,,5 __ _ lnvestigator(s): Chris Wdaht Emmett Pritchard Section, Township, Range: S22 T23N RSE W-M Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.}: cH!!!ills,sl.,,o.,pe._ ________ Local relief {concave, convex, none): ,.Co,,nu,ye='-----Slope(%): _2 __ Subregion (LRR): Northwest forests & coasts (LRR-A) Lat: 47 46651 Q Long: -122.151222 Datum: unknown Soil Map Unit Name: Newberg silt loam NWI classification: uno..,n,,e,_ _____ _ Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typlcal for this time of year? Yes ~ No D (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation_. Soil __ , or Hydrology __ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes D No 181 Are Vegetation_. Soil_. or Hydrology __ naturally problematic? (tt" needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hyclrophytlc Vegetation Present? Yes 121 NoO lo Ula Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? YesD No 121 within a Welland? YesO No 121 Wetland Hydrology Present? YesD No121 Remarks: Sample Plot 5 ls located In a stand of alder and balsam poplar, near the central portion of the site. VEGETATION -Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trm!~lum (Plot size: Sm radius) ~~YI:[ Species? ...filml!L Number of Dominant Species 1. AIC!Ui llllml (rmt lldm:l 50 L__ Ee&_ That Af8 OBL, FAON, or FAC: ? (A) 2. Pgpulys balsamifera (balsam poplar) 25 _Y __ Ee&...._ Total Number of Dominant 3. ------Species Across All Strata: • (B) 4. ------Percent of Dominant Species Z5 = Total Cover That Ive OBL, FAON, or FAC: ZS (A/B) SaE!llag[SbC!Jb Stratum (Plot size: aro radius) 1. Bubu1 armenll!:i! m U:llm1lm::1u bli~m2r:nd Z5 L__ .E&.lJ...... Prevalence In-worksheet: 2. Total% Coyer of· Mulli'21lt:~' ------ 3. ------OBL species x1= 4. ------FAON species x2= 5. ------FAC species Z5 x3=225 Z5 = Total Cover FACU species Z5 x4=3QQ 11em Slmlum (Plot size: 1 rn radius> UPL species x5= 1. ------Column Totals: 150 (A) 550 (B) 2. ------ 3. Prevalence Index • BIA = .3.Z. ------ 4. ------Hydrophyllc Vegetation Indicators: 5. ------0 1 -Rapid Test for Hyaophytlc Vegetation 8. 121 2 -Dominance Test Is >50% ------ 7. D 3 -Prevalence Index ls S3.0 1 ------ D 4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. ------ 9. data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) ------0 5 • Wetland Noo-Vasrutar Plants' 10. ------0 Problematic Hydropllytlc Vegetation' (Explain) 11. ------'lndlcakn ol hydrtc soil and -.ct hydrology must ll =Total Covar be present, unlea disturbed or problematic. Woodv ~Ill Stnm.im (Plol stze: 3m radiua> 1. ------Hydrophyllc 2. ----Vegetation ll • Total ea.er Pl'INnt? Yae121 NoO % Bare Ground In Herb SlrabJm JI -·-- Remarks: . US Amry Corpo ti E~ Weslam Mountains, Valleys, and Coast-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point:~ Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or conflnn the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matm5 R~22!; Eeatu~ (iag]fiilsl QQ!Q[ (mQi~) ___'lL_ QQl2c (m2isl) ___!&_ ~ _1JJL_ rmum Remads5 Q::l2+ 1Ql'.B ~ --FS.L -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 'T· ·--, C-Concentratlon D=De•letion RM-Reduced Mabix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2location: PL-Pore Linina. M=Matrix. Hydrlc Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise notad.J Indicators for Problematlc Hydrlc Soils': 0 Histosol(A1) 0 Sandy Redox (S5) 0 2 cm Muck (A10) 0 Hlstic Epipedon (A2) 0 Sbipped Matrix (S6) 0 Red Parent Material (TF2) 0 Black Hlstlc (A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) 0 Very Shallow Dark Surlaca (TF12) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Mabix (F2) 0 OU1er (Explain in Remarks) 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) 0 Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Th1ckDarkSurlaca(A12) 0 Redox Dark Surface (F8) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 0 Depleted Dark Surlaca (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) 0 Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydrlc Soll P1'88ent? YesO No 181 Remarks: Solis at the sample plot iocation are extremely rocky/gravely. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: edmaO'. llldkilbml (miaimum m '2[lSl ma11imd· chACk all lbal a!X!b:l ~ ladlgimlli (2 QC WQ!ll ~111!d} 0 Sur1acaWater(A1} 0 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 0 Water-stained Leaves (B9} (MLRA 1, 2, 0 High Water Table (A2) 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) 0 Saturation (A3) 0 Sall Crust (B11) 0 Drainage Pattems(B10) 0 Water Marks (B1) 0 Aquatic Invert-(B13) 0 0Jy-8eason Water Table (C2) 0 Sadinent Deposits (B2) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 0 Drift Deposits (B3) 0 Oxidized Rhlzospheres along Living Roots (C31 0 Geomorphlc Position (D2) 0 Algal Mat or Crust (B41 0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Shallow Aquitard (03) 0 Iron Deposits (B5) 0 Recent Iron Reduction In TBled Soils (C6) 0 FA~utral Test (05) 0 Surfaca Soll Cracks (B8) 0 Stunted or S-Plants (D1) (LRR A) 0 Raised Ant Mounds (D6} (LRR A) 0 Inundation \/lslble on Ae1ia1 Imagery (B7) 0 Other (Explain In Remarks) 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks (D7) 0 Spanely Vegetated Concave Surfaca (B8) Field DbMrvatlans: SLriace W-Prasent7 YesO No 181 Depth Onches): W-Table Prasent7 YesO No 181 Depth Onches): Saturation Prasent7 YesO No 181 llnclooes -·--· frl-' Depth (lncMs): Wetland Hydrology P1'881nl7 Yes0 No181 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring wel, aerial photos, previoul u10pecU011s), W available: -ND-.CO of Inundation--Soils_,, not saturaled and nowa1M lablewae det8clad wtthln the upper 12 Inches of the sol pn,lle. Westam Mountaine, Valleys, and Coast -Version 2.0 Wetland Identification, Evaluation And Delineation And General Biological Review Of IE S ASSOCIATES "the wetlands group" EXHIBIT 6 Wetland Identification, Evaluation And Delineation And General Biological Review Of Cedarwood Site 140th Way SE & Maple Valley Hwy King County, Washington For Lennon Investments, Inc. 14410 Bell-Red Road, Suite #140 Bellevue, WA 98007 by !ES Associates 1514 Muirhead Avenue Olympia, WA 98502 (360) 943-0127 FAX (360) 943-2791 February 3, 1995 Table of Contents 1.0 Jntroductlon ........... ,. •.•..•..•.•....... . . ........... . 1 2.0 Evaluation Procedures .•••..••...•......• , • • . . • • • . . • . . . • • 2 2.1 Regulator)'····························"·········· 2 2.2 Background Data Collection • • . . . . . • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • . . . • . 3 2.3 Field Procedures . . . • • • • • • • . • . . • . . . . • • • . • • • . . . . • . . • 3 3.0 Site Description ......................... ·. . . . . • . . . . . . . . . 6 4.0 Evaluatfon Results ................. • ... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a 4.1 VegetaUon ............... , ....... , . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . a 4.1.1 Forested Uplands • • . • • • • • • • . • . • • . • • • • • . • . • . • . 8 4.1.2 Disturbed Meadows • . . . . • • • . . . • • • . • . • . . • • • • . . 9 4.1 .3 Cultlvated Pasture Meadows . . • • . . • . • • . . . . • . • . . 1 o 4.1.4 Wetland Vegetation .•. • . . • . . . . . • • . • . . . • . . • • . . 11 4.2 Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.2.1 Soll Classlflcatlon . • • . • . . • • • • . . • • . . . . • • . . • • • • 12 4.2.2 Soll Cores . . . . . . . • . . . . • • • . . . • • • . . • • • • . • • • • ,14 Hyd I '1e 4.3 ro ogy . • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • . • ••••••••••• 4.4 Wetlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.4.1 Wetland Classiflcatlon • • . • • . • • • • . • . • • • . • • • • • • • 21 4.4.2 Wetland Values . • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . • • • • . . • . • 22 4.4.2.1 Functional Values •.••....• , , • . • • • • • . • 22 4.4.2.2 Blologlcal Values •••..•. , .•• , • • . • . • . . • 23 5.0 Summary . :_· . . . . . . . . . . . • • . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . • . . . . . . . 25 Blbllography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . • • . • . . . . . . . . • 28 Appendix A -Maps and Figures , •••••.•.•••••••••••••.•• , • • • • 30 Appendix B -Tables ........• _, • _. ................... -.......... , , • 31 Appendix C -Field Data Forms .• ;, •.•...• -...•••.. •:-,. :-!'"·. • • • • • • • • • • 32 -----· --~~~ ~-~ i 1.0 lntroductlori A site evaluation was completed on properties located south of the Maple Valley Highway (SR 169), along both sides of 140th Way SE. The property extends from the highway, on the north, up steep slopes to the south property line. Molasses Creek transects the western edge of the site. (Figure 1 -Location Map, Appendix A). A survey was conducted to locate, define and delineate wetlands and streams, as defined In the Klng County Sensitive Areas Ordinance No. 9614, and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The site was lnltlaJly evaluated by !ES Associates In 1988 and 1989. A report, dated July 12, 1989, was completed at that time. The site was ' 'l 1'8-'evaluated In January -February 1995, to: (1) determine If the wetlands Identified In 1988-89 were accurate; (2) locate and Identify seeps and springs on the hlllsides; (3) Identify and define the mean high water line (MHW) and bounds of associated · wetlands of Molasses 'creek: and (4) Identify and define the functions and values and classify the wetlands, using procedures outlined In the King County Sensitive Areas Ordinance and the U. 5. Fish & WIidiife Service, CJassiflcatlon of Wetlands and Deep Weter Habitats of the Un)ted States, Cowardln, 1979. Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 2.0 Evaluation Procedures Evaluation procedures were divided into three sections: (1) regulatory; (2) background data collection; and (3) field evaluation. 2.1 Regulatory Three regulatory authorities were taken Into conslderatlon In the evaluation of the wetlands and general biological review of the site. These were the King County • Sensitive Areas Ordinance No .. 9614, Section 404 of the Clear, Water Act, 'and ! Hydraullc Project Appllcatlon, RCW 75.20.100, Chapter 2.20 -110. Because of the differences In regulations, two evaluation procedures were required: (1) the Federal Manual for the Jdentlflcatlon and Denneatfon of Jurtsdlctlonal Wetlands (1989) by King · County; and (2) Corps of Engineers Wetlands Qe(lneatfon Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 (1987) by the Army Corps of Engineers. At completion, the results of the two procedures were compared to see If there was a significant difference In wetland boundaries. 2 ' Wetland Identification, Evaluatlon and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 2.2 Background Data Collection Background data collectlon Included the review of previous wetlands dellneatlons and data collected by B-12 Associates and R. W. Thorpe and Associates, prior to 1988. Other documents reviewed Included the Soll Conservation Service, .5.121.l smvey of KJog County Areas, Washington; U. s. Fish and Wlldl!fe Service, NWI maps; King County wetland maps; Rittenhouse, Zlmman and Associates (RZA) geo-technlcal report dated April 21, 1988; U. S. Geological Su1Vey topographic maps; Washington Department of Natural Resources, ortho-topo maps; Washington Department of Fisheries Stream Catalog and Salmon Ut!Hzatlon; and topographic maps provided by • , . • Hugh G. Goldsmith, Consulting Engineers, Surveyors & Planners. 2,3 Field Procedures The Unified Federal Agency Procedure. as ldenUfled, was utilized for determination of the wetland boundary. Highway 169 was used as a baseline for the dellneatlon transects. Transect lines were run from Highway 169 south across the property to the toe of the steep slope or beyond, depending upon the general vegetative character of the site. Areas that had predominant upland vegetation were defined as uplands, because of the r:nultlple requirement of the Unified Federal Agency procedure. In these areas, no additional ~r:yeys W!ilre conducted. ' Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 At points where there was a change In vegetative character from predominantly upland to facultatfve or facultatlve weUand species, th~ presence of surface or groundwater, or a distinct change In elevation, the multlparameter analysis was conducted. At these points, soil cores were established to determine the presence or absence of hydrlc sells. Holes were dug to 20 Inches to evaluate groundwater or perched surface water. In 1988, little emphasis was placed on the presence or absence of groundwater, because of the time of the survey (July). In January 1995, water was considered the principal Indicator, because of the amount of rainfall and unseasonably warm temperatures (Table 1, Appendix B). Where the. soil samples were Indicative of hydrlc conditions, (dark colored, heavily mottled, or with other characteristics that Indicated persistent hydrology), or · there was positive hydrology at 12 to 18 Inches, the area was considered wet (Table 2, Appendix B). · Steep slopes were examined for the presence of seeps,. based on vegetation, silt deposits, or positive hydrology. Depressions In the meadows were examined for changes In vegetative characteristics. If there was a presence of facultatlve wet or 4 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site l"'obruary 3, 199::1 facultatlve plant species, the presence of hydrlc sons and/or evidence of extended winter surface water, the area was determined to be a wetland (Table 3, Appendix B}. Toe completed wetland boundary was flagged, using sequentially number pink and yellow double flagging, to separate the wetland boundary flagging from other suivey flagging that has occurred or might occur on the site. Hydrology on the site was examined using three baste criteria: (1) the presence of standing water; (2) evidence of extended standing surface water for a ' .. period long enough to effect either the sons or the vegetative conditions; and (3) suh- surface saturation at 12-18 Inches below the surface. Each of the soil cores were examined for hydrlc conditions, Including the oxidized root zones, mottles, accretions, · or other criteria which are Indicative of extended shallow sUrfijce water. Toe functions and blologlcal values of the wetlands and stream corridors wa:s evaluated, using Wetland Values; Concepts and Methods for Wetlands Eyaluatlon, Reppert (1979) and Wetland Evaluation Technique CNEJJ, Vol. II: "Methodology" Adamus, (1987), and Washington Department of Ecology, Wetland Buffers Use and Effegtfyeness, 1992. 5 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 Each wetland was classffled, using the U. S. Fish & WIidiife classlflcatlon procedures, Classlflcatfon of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States, ,-Cowardln, 1979, and King County classlflcatlon system, as Identified In Sensitive Areas Ordinance No. 9614. 3.0 Site Description . ' Toe site extends from the top of a severe slope on the south to Hlghway'169 l on the north. The project site Is split Into east and west sections by 140th Way S.E. The east side Includes an abandoned gravel pit, which has created a flat plateau. The south boundary slopes down to the north to the plateau. The plateau drops off rapidly · down steep slopes·to the north and east The eastern slope extends off the project property, while the north-facing slope extends down to the flat meadows located between the toe of the slope and Highway 169 (Figure 2 -Site Map, Appendix A). •. There fs a nnear drainage located at the toe of the slope throughout the property. It starts with an Intermittently flowing area In the east end and extends . . westerly to 140th Wey SJ:. At tlils point, there ls a culvert under 140th Way S.E. that 6 Wetland ldentlf!catlon, Evaluatlon and Delineation · RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 appears to be blocked, since It Is trlckllng the flow. There Is a large 72-lnch culvert that Is raised above the ground level. Apparently, this design Is to allow animals from one side of 140th Way S.E. to the other. Because of the elevatlon of the Invert and a dam at the east end, water movement through the large culvert appears to be Impossible. A flat pasture/meadow extends from the toe of the slope north to Highway 169. There Is a residence and out-bulldlngs at the east end of this meadow. ( .. ' The area west of 140th Way S.E. slopes down to a man-made stormwater detention pond, located south of the entrance road to properties to the west. The . pond was constructed by the Maple Ridge Estates, as a temporary wastewater · ' treatment system. Molasses Creek flows.down this slope In a steep-sided ravine until It exits the property to the west at the toe of the slope. There Is a road and a surface water.collectlon/dralnage area between the toe of the slope In this area and the culUvated pasture that parallels Highway 169. Toe pasture Is an extension of the pasture that lies east of 140th Way S.E. .~ -_:-:;; • .c.;::"-.4':-: •,; . 7 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 4.1 Vegetation 4.0 Evaluation Results The project site consists of forested upland, disturbed meadow, pasture meadow and wetland habitats. The wetlands are further divided Into different wetland plant communities (Figure 3 -Vegetation Map, Appendix A). 4.1.1 Forested Uplands • Forested upland habitats exist on the steep slopes extending from the southern ' ' edge of the property northerly to the pastured meadows that parallel SR 169. The tree vegetation, or overstory, Is a mix of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menz/esl~, big-leaf maple (Acer macrophy/lum) and red alder (A/nus rubra). The majority of the upland Is on relatively steep slopes to extremely steep slopes. The understory consists of a mix of vine maple (Acer clrclnatum) ocean-spray (Holodfscus dlsco/ol'} red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), osoberry (Osmaron/a ceras/formls), Oregon grape (Barberis aqu/follum), mahonla (Berberfs nervosa, repens), and salal (Gaultherta shallon), With a dense understory In some areas of sweet fennel (Foen/cu/um vulgare)and trailing blackberry (Rubus ursln~. Jh~ _ground cover varies with the exposure, with the ' heaviest.ground cover being on the south-facing slope bordering 140th Way S.E. 8 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, _1995 · The area bordering Molasses Creek has a predominance of alder In the overstory with the same mixed understory. Closer to the stream, there was a .. predominance of saJmonberry (Rubus spectabllls) in some areas, where the stream bed was wider than the bottom of the ravine. Slopes were dotted with occasional patches of devil's club (Opopanax horrfdum) In areas where there were small seeps. In all Instances, the seeps were Isolated, and did not provide a sufficient amount of water downstream to create wetland conditions. The bottoms of the slopes closer to the wetland areas supported mixed western I ' . ' red cedar (Thu/a pffcata) and western hemlock (Tsuga hetarophylfa}, with alder and big-leaf maple. \ 4.1.2 Disturbed Meadows The old gravel pit meadow Is a flat plain where gravel excavation has occurred In the past The grasses In this area are a mix of native and non-native species, which Indicates that the area may have been seeded at some time In the past =·" Dominant grasses varied, but were typlcally quackgrass (Agropyron repens), orchard grass (Dactylls glomerata), redtop (AgrosUs alba), timothy (Phleum pratense), and a ' variety of rye grasses, Including baslnwUd,-rye (Elymus clnereus), blue Wild-rye 9 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site ·February 3, 1995 (E/ymus g/aucus) and perennial ryegrass (Loi/um perenne). The upland area had a mix of luplnes, Including red clover (Tr/fol/um pratense), white clover (Tr/fol/um repens), common vetch (Vic/a satlva), and wlld sweet pea (Lathyrus Ungltanus). Other species Included cats-ear (Hypochaer/s g/abra), starwort (Stellar/a gramlnea), mayweed (Anthemfs cotufa), Canada thlstle (Cfrs/um.arvense), bull thistle (Clrs/um vu/gare), tansy (Tanacetum vufgare), and tansy ragwort (Seneclo Jacobaea). 4.1.3 Cultivated Pasture Meadows ' These areas consist of the two meadow areas bordering SR 169 along both I sides of 140th Way S.E. Vegetation Is a mix of native and non-native grasses. The dominant grasses vary from area to area. In the north end, the predominant grasses closest to the wetland area are a bentgrass mix, with the dominant grasses being · colonial bentgrass (AgrosUs tenufs), and red top. Other grasses are timothy, western wheatgrass (Agropyron smith/~, sweet vernal grass (Anthoxanthum odoratum), rye grasses, lncludlng groups of the Elymus genus as well as the non-native Lqllum genus. To the east there are more wheatgrass species, Including blue-bunch wheatgrass (Agropyron splcatum) and western wheatgrass In the mix. 10 • Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 4.1.4 Wetland Vegetation Vegetation In the wetlands Is predominantly an alder/western red cedar dominated community with big-leaf maple In transition areas on upland Islands Incorporated within the wetlands. The alder are most abundant In the drainages of the seeps, with the cedar being In the slfghtly drier Islands or hummocks on flats at the tops of the slopes, where there Is more soll stabillty. The understory in the seep areas Is 'dominated by salmonberry, with patches of devil's club and scattered hardhack (Spiraea douglasm. Oregon ash (Fraxlnus lat/fol/a) mixes with the cedar and alder at the toe of the slope, where the hlll~lde surface runoff collects In an east to • . { west drainage-way. Vegetation at the toe of the slope Includes hardhack and salmonberry, with · dense stands of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus d/scol<?1' In and adjacent to the ·- wetlands. The open meadow areas and areas with open canopy on the seep slopes have skunk-cabbage (Lys/chiton amerfcanum), field horsetail (Equlsetum arvense), water- parsley (Oenanthe sarmentosa) and creeping buttercup (Ranuncu/us repens). In areas where the water moves rilQre · rapidly do.wn the slope, the buttercup becomes 11 • Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 dominant. In drier areas, piggy-back plant (To/me/a menzies/i) replaces or Is mixed with the buttercup. Toe drainage, along the toe of. the slope varies but has patches of buttercup and skunk cabbage, along with broad-leaf cattail (Typha latlfo/la), small-fruit bulrush (Sclrpus mlcrocarpus), soft rush (Juncus effusus), dagger-leaf rush (Juncus ensifo/lus) and reed canarygrass (Pha/arls 8f1!ndlnacea). Reed canarygrass and buttercup extend out from the edge of the wetland Into I the cultlvated pasture, throughout much of the IE,mgth of the east side of the wetland. A 11st 9f plants Is Included as Table 4, Appendix B. 4.2 Solla 4.2.1 Soll Classlflcatlon Soll Conservation Service, Son SuryeyofKJng County Area. Washington, dated 4 1973, ldentlfled four basic soul groups on the site. Dominant soils on the site are Alderwood and Kitsap sons, (AkF), This mapping unit Is usually 50% Alderwood gravelly sanely loam and 25% Kltsapsiit loarn. There Is approximately 15% of the 12 ' Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site · February 3, 1995 area that Includes unnamed, very deep, moderately coarse textured soils with approximately 10% of the site having some Indianola soils. The drainage and the permeablllty vary. Runoff is rapid to very rapid and the erosion hazard Is severe to very severe on this soil type (Figure 4 -Soll Map, Appendix A). The south slopes are Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (Age), 6 to 15 percent slopes. The soil profile of the Alderwood soils, from 0-2 Inches, is usually a very dark brown (10YR 2/2 to 4/2) With a fine, dry, weak granular structure. The second proflle, which Is from 2 to 12 Inches, Is dark brown (10YR 4/3) gravelly sandy loam to brown • •• (10YR 5/3). Soils of this type are usually associated With forested uplands and because of the steepness and granular nature of the soils do not support standing water for any length of time. These soils are classified as non-hydnc by the Soll · Conservation Service. ·- The third soil type, which Is found in the meadow east of 140th Way S.E., Is Newberg, silt loam '(Ng). This soil ls usually found In long narrow areas that range from 5 to more than 100 acres. The slopes are less than 2 percent and are mosUy convex. The "A" horizon Is a very dry grayish-brown (10YR 3/2 to 5/2) to a depth of 8 to 10 Inches •. The 1 !31 horizon Is a very dark grayish-brown (10YR 3/2) with fine 13 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site · February 3, 1995 · sandy loam blendlng to a grayish-brown (1 OYR 5/2). A third horizon, which extends from 18 to 36 Inches, Is dark grayish-brown (10YR 3/2) and grayish-brown (2.SYR 4/2) very fine sandy loam. Newberg sandy loam Is a Fluventlc Haploxerolls, which Is classlfled as an upland soil, by SGS Hydrtc Soils of the United States. The fourth sol! type found In the meadow west of 140th Way S.E. and In the northeast comer of the pasture, east of 140th, Is Puyallup fine sandy loam (Py). the Puyallup series Is made up of well-drained soils, dark grayish-brown, fine sandy loam. The surface and sub-surface soils to 34 Inches are listed ~ 10YR 3/2 td 4/2. ! They are Fluventlc Haploxerolls, classified as uplands by Soll Conservation Service Hydr!c sons of the United states. 4.2.2 Soll Cores Soll cores were taken along four transect !Ines, from Highway 169 on the north, to the toe of the slope and up the toe of slope, to the south, to a point where there was a dominance.of .upland plant species. Soils were found to be consistent across the meadow to a point within 25 feet of the depression that has formed along the toe of the slope. At this point, the soils are darker, with a higher organic and silt content that has accumulated · over the years In the depression at the toe of the slope. 14 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Deffneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 . Additional cores were taken In low spots In the Immediate vicinity of the transect lines that did not fall within the transect Jines. If these soils were consistent with the soil samples found on the transect !Ines, they were not recorded. Vegetation was Identified In a one-meter square surrounding each of the soil cores. Soll In the meadow, along Highway 169, Is a 2.5Y 5/2 to 2.5Y 5/3 sandy loam, with no mottling. In certain areas, the soils were 10YR 4/2 to 10YR 3/4. A total of 14 soil samples were taken along these four transects. Soils were not collected In areas along the toe of the slope, where there was a predominance of obligate wetl_and . . '~ species or the evidence of extended standing surface water (Figure 5 -Soll Cores Locations Map, Appendix A). Soll samples taken between the residence and the toe of the slope, lh the southeast comer of the site, varied from 10YR 2/2 with mottling, to 10YR 4/2 with no mottling. In the area south of the wetland, the bank slopes up at a near 45 degrees. Vegetation Is predominantly Douglas fir, with other upland species. No soil samples were taken In this area. .. ~·' ,,. ,, . 15 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Deilneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 Additional soil samples were taken In the out-wash, Just east of the residence and along the hlllslde seeps. Soils In the out-wash were 1 OYA 2/2, with no mottling In the top 4-6 Inches. Soils along the seeps on the east-facing slope, were dark gray-brown (10YR 2/1 to 2/2) with mottling In the"A" horizon. In the non-wetland area, the •a• horizon was a 10YR 5/3 loamy sand with no mottling. In the wetter areas, the '8' horizon was 10YR 5/1 with extensive SYR 4/4 to 7.SYR 4/6 mottles and accretions. 4.3 Hydrology I Two major sources of hydrology on the project site are hlllslde seeps, which are fed by rainfall and groundwater percolation, and Molasses Creek, which enters the site from the west and flows northwesterly to exit the site west of the Maple Ridge Estates · stormwater pond. ·- Hlllslde seeps erupt along the base of the access road to the abandoned gravel . mine In the south-central portion of the property. Two major seep areas are separated by a hog-back ridge, that projects to the east from the gravel mine area. lhe smaller of the two abuts 140th Way SE and drains down-slope, to the toe of the slope. To the south, the larger·ol'll1e'twcfalso drains down-slope. The two are · 16 .. ,,, .. .,,.,. .. ,..-.. Wetland ldentlflcatlon, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site ·February 3, 1995 connected approximately mid-slope by addlt!ona! hillside seeps. All of the water flows to the toe of the slope. Drainage from off-site to the east also collect In the drainage-way at the toe of the slope. The wetland at the toe of the slope, Is divided Into two segments by an out-wash of sell that crosses the natural drainage-way Just west of the existing residence. East of ttie out-wash, water collects In a pond directly west of the residence. The wetland, from the pond east to the east property llne, Is a skunk cabbage/water parsley/buttercup flat, with an alder canopy. ' ' I West of the out-wash, drainage from the hl_f!slde seeps flows to the west through a culvert, that crosses under 140th Way SE. The drainage-way through this · area has cattail anq_small-frult bulrush In the deepest channel, with skunk cabbage, water horsetail and field horsetall on the slope extending West Toe edges of the wetland In this area· have dense stands of Himalayan blackberry, giving way to .•• ,..... ·· salmonberry, In areas where the alder/cedar canopy Is near 100% (Figure 6 - Drainage Map, Appendix A). " ----~~?:. }!-- • ·-•"" c• .. 17 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 There Is an abandoned water system on the hlllslde slope, with a dammed outlet. The outlet has formed a gully down the slope, which still supports Intermittent water during rainy periods of the year. Erosion from this out-fall created the out- wash, which blocked and separated the main east-west drainage at the toe of the slope. The soils and vegetation In this abandoned drainage-way are not hydrlc, Indicating the area was created as a water source for the gravel mining operation from uplands. When water does exit the system, It flows downhlll to collect In the east- I west drainage-way. Surface water drainage, from Maple Ridge Estates, dralns Into a man-made · stormwater pond (King County No. D-91308) at the base of the slope, along the west side of 140th Way S.E. Water enters the pond U,rough a large culvert at the east end of U,e pond. It flows through a series of meandered structures, before being discharged, through an underground culvert, Into Molasses Creek, near the west boundary of the project site. 18 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Def!neatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 4.4 Wetlands The wetlands are located on the east-facing slope and at the toe of the slope, between the forested upland community and the pastured meadow community. All the wetlands are natural, with the exception of the temporary stormwater pond that was created for the Maple Ridge Estates. The King County Wetlands Inventory Notebook Identifies one wetland on the property. This Is referred to as the Lower Cedar River 3 (LCR 3), which Is rated as Class 2, "Significant,' according to guldellnes set out In the Notebook. This wetland ' •• ' Is located east of 140th Way S.E. at the toe of the slope. The true wetland on the site extends west of LCR 3 to 140th Way S.E. and · west of 140th Way -~-E., along the toe of the slope to the west property line. The wetland slope on the east side of 140th Way S.E. ls fed by seeps that sheettlow down the slope Into the west end of LCR 3 or Into the drainage ditch that connects LCR 3 to a culvert under 140th Way S.E. (Figure 7 -Wetlands Map, Appendix A). A majority of the slope wetland In this area has an alder/Western red cedar/big- leaf maple canopy. _Along the toe .of thelllopE!, lt_opens Into a smaJJ meadow area that 19 Wetland ldentlficatlon, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 Is dominated by field horsetail, skunk cabbage, velvet grass and red top. The . wetlands In LCR 3 are an emergent marsh In the west half, with cattail, small-fruit bulrush, soft rush and reed canarygrass. Buttercup becomes dominant towards the east and west ands, where the alder-canopy Is thickest. East of the property, the wetlands continue In a narrow ditch along the toe of the slope. The dominant vegetation In this area Is alder and Hlmalayan blackberry, with an understory mix of buttercup, field horsetail and small-fruit bulrush. Toe wetland west of 14oth Way S.E. consists of a continuation of the drainage ditch that extends from the access road fill on the west;to the meadow on the east. Vegetation In this area Is a mix of Himalayan blackberry and salmonberry along the edge, with small fruit bulrush, buttercup and grasses In the bottom of the slough. Toe second wetland west of 140th Way S.E. ls a man-made retention/detention pond created by the Maple Rldge Estates. This Is a diverse wetland that appears to have been planted pr!marlly as a cattail/bulrush area. WIiiows are growing Into the area. In addition, the area supports duckweed, water parsley, water hemlock, and soft rush. 20 ,··1, ...• -,:-, ' Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneation RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 The last wetland on the site Is Molasses Creek, which runs through the draw on the west side of the property. The creek starts-west of the property and runs under the powerllnes, through a steep ravine that exits Just west of the man-made stormwater pond. The creek runs Into the Cedar River west of the project site. The wetland Is restricted to the low-flow channel of the creek throughout most of the flow on the property, because of the steepness of the side slopes and the gradient of the stream. 4.4.1 Wetland Classiflcatlon ' Based on the wetland plant associations (Wetland Plants of King County and Puget Sound Lowlands), five types of wetlands exist on the property. These are: 1. Shallow Marsh -averaging less than one foot of water. Predominant plants Include cattail, sedges and softrush: 2. Wet Meadow -Intermittently flooded and seasonally saturated. Vegetation present lncluaes creeping buttercup, water parsley, sedges, soft rush, and horsetail; 3. Scrub/Shrub -seasonally flooded or saturated, supporting willow, red alder, red-osier dogwood, and saJmonberry; 4. Forested -with a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees, Including red alder, big-leaf maple and western red cedar. The shrub layer Includes salmonberry, devil's club, red elderberry and red-osier dogwood; 5. Stream and stream bank 21 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 Under the U. S. Fish and wildlife Service Classification System, portions of the habitats are not large enough (% of total wetlands) to be classifled as a wetland class. Therefore, under this classiflcatlon these same wetlands would be classified as: (1) Palustrine Emergent Narrow-leaved Persistent (PEM1); (2) Palustrlne Forested Broad-leaf Deciduous (PF01); and (3) Riverine Upper ·Perennial Stream bed (R3SB1/2). Under the King County wetland classification system, the wetlands would be classified as Class 2 wetlands and Molasses Creek would be classified as a Class 2 Stream. Three sections of the wetland were flagged as Wetlands 1 -3, using sequentially numbered flags. Molasses Creek was flagged along the mean high water line (Mf-:IW). 4A.2 WeUand Values 4A.2.1 FuncUonal Values Functional values of the wetlands refer to flood desynchronlzatlon, bloflltratlon, sediment coDectlon, nutrient uptake, groundwater recharge, and --"--. 22 • Wetland Identification, Evaluation ana cenneauon RE: Cedarwood Sita February 3, 1995 any other functions that are related to the manner In wt,lch the wetland alters the flow or movement of water through the area. The wetland Is a collectlon point at the toe of the slope and a runoff and drainage area for farm fields and the back of the residence. Toa retention/detention of the waters Increases the sediment removal, as the water moves from one portion to the other. Because the wetlands are Isolated, most of the water Is either taken up In evaporation/ evapo_transplratrorl or enters Into the soil recharging the groundwater table. 4.4.2.2 Blologlcal Values Blologlcal values of the wetlands are limlted throughout with ltt,a exception of those areas where there Is Intermittent standing water and the man-made waste water retention/detention system west of 140th Way S.E. Most of the blologlcal values are related to the adjacent habitat, I.e., either the meadow to the north or the hill slope to the south. The hill slope to the south, being a wooded area, supplies habitat for typical deciduous/coniferous forested species, while the open meadow provides feeding habitat for Insectivores and habitat for mice, voles and other gnawing mammals. 23 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 The wetlands, bX nature being a linear drainage along the toe of the slope, provides a watering area for a majority of the animals that llve In the forested portion of the uplands. The larger wetland, classified as LCR 3, provides nesting habitat area _for r~d-wlnged black bird, long-billed marsh wren, and a variety of other wetland species. This area also provides an Insectivorous feeding area by the nature of the large Insect colony usually found In and around cattail stands. Major species using this area were three varieties of swallows. Mallard nest and rear young on the pond Just south of the residence. During the winter, the Intermittently standing water areas ' provide a loafing and feeding for migratory and wintering water fowl. We expect that the major user of this area Is mallard. The ~ewater system designed by the Fir Crest Apartments, located west of 14oth Way S.E., supplies nesting habitat for a variety of species, Including mallard, red-winged blackbird, long-billed marsh wren, winter wren, . ,;(and .possibly .yellow-throat. The dike surrounding this area showed evidence of muskrat activity. ·Besides nesting species, there Is a variety of other bird species using the area for feeding and perching, because of the populallon of Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 .• Pacific tree frogs and other amphibians and mice and voles In this area This prey base attracts raccoon, skunks, coyote and great blue heron. Molasses Creek provides functional value for creek-side nesting birds, such as yellow-throats, winter wren, Bewfck's wren, and a variety of other species that typically use low shrub areas that will concentrate near running water. Because of the gradient of the stream, In-stream WIidiife activity Is severely llmfted. • The creek ls Identified as a coho, sockeye salmon stream by 'the Washington Department of Fisheries, A Catalog of WashJngton Streams and Salmon utmzat!Qn, Volume 1, WRIA 08 (Figure a -Washington Streams Map, Appendix A). 5.0 Summary The site consists of steep slopes paralleling both sides of 140th Way S.E. to a flat pasbJred area that extends from the toe of the slope to Highway 169. " 25 -- ·< •. 1 Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 Hlstorlcally, the area was used for pasture and hay. The original site was a dairy farm, which Indicates the general area was used Intensively. There Is a linear drainage located at the toe of the slope throughout the property. Jt starts with an Intermittently flowing area In the east end and runs westerly to 140th Way S.E. HIiiside seeps to the south contribute to the water source. At this point, there is a culvert under 140th Way S.E. that appears to be blocked, since It Js trickling the flow. There is a large 72-inch culvert that Is raised above the ground level. Apparently, this design Is to allow animals from one side of 140th Way S.E. to ' ' the other. Wetlands consist of one Identified wetland Oower Cedar River 3), a narrow ' Intermittently flooded marsh and revalued wetland along the toe of the slope, slope seeps and a man-made stormwater pond west of 140th Way S.E. Of all the wetlands, the man-made system has the highest bJoJoglcal values per unit of area of any of the wetlands on the site. 26 ... · . , • Wetland ldentlflcatlon, Evaluation and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 This constitutes a Wetland Delineation Report by JES Associates on the Cedarwood Property, located In King County, Washington • oi::e:i;ely, . IJ~/J~ R. L 'Rex' Van Wormer Senior Biologist I ES Associates cedrwood.rp \ .•. -· 27 .. Bibliography Adamus, Paul R., ElllsJ. Clalraln, Jr., Danie! Smith, Richard E. Young. 1987. Wetland Evaluation Technique (.WE]) Vol. II: 'Methodology". U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment State, Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Cowardln, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golat and E.T. LeRow. 1979. Class!flcatJon of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wlldllfe Service Publication FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal lnteragency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Denneatlng ,lurtsdlctlonal Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A., Soll Conservation Service, Washington D.C. Co-operative technical publlcatlon • .. Franklin, J.F. and C.T. Dymess. 1969. Vegetation of Oregon and Washington, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon. Good, Ralph E., Dennlsh F. Whigham, Robert L Simpson. Freshwater Wetlands EcoJogjcal Processes and Management Potentlaf. 1978. Academic Press, New York. Greeson, P.E., J.R. Clark and J.E. Clark, eds. 1978. Wetland Functions and Values ; The State of Our Understanding. Proceedings of the National Symposiur11 on Wetlands, American Water Resources Association. Technical Pt.ibl!catlon Serles TPS 79-2. Hitchcock, C.L and A. Cronquist 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle. King County, 1990, Sensitive Areas Ordinance No. 9614. Marble, Anne D. 1992. A Gulde to Wetland functional Design. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan. Nusbaum, et al Amphibians and BeptHes of the PacJf[c Northwest. Reed, P .B., Jr. 1986. Wetland Plants of the State of Washington. 1986 u.s. Fish and WlldHfe Service Publication. WELlJf -86/W12.47. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. Natrona! List of Plant Species That Occur Jn Wetlands ; Northwest (BegJon 9), U.S. Fish and WIidiife Service Publication. WELlJf-88 (26.9) • • 28 • Wetland ldentlflcatfon, Evaluation and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 Reppert, R. T., W. Slgleo, E. Stackhlv, L Messman, and C. Meyers. 1979. Wetland Values; Concepts and Methods for Wetlands Eyaluatlon. IWR Res. Rep. 79-R-1, U. S. Army Corps Englnrs., Fort Belvolr, VA Robbins, c.s., B. Brunn and H.S. Zlm. 1966. Birds of North America. Golden Press, New York. Soll Survey Staff. 1988. Keys to Soll Taxonomy. Cornell University. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands DenneatJon Manual. Tech. Rep. Y-87-1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soll Conservation Service. Son Taxonomy· A Basic System of son CJa.sslflcallon for Making and Interpreting Soll surveys. 1981. Agriculture Handbook No. 435. · U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soll Conservation Service. Son Survey of KJrn~ County Areas. Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 'D.C. Washington Department of Fisheries, A Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon utmzatlon, Volume 1, WRIA oa Washington Natural Heritage Program. 1987. Endangered, Threatened and Senslt1ve \/ascuJar PJants of Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, · Olympia. Washington Natural Heritage Program. 1989. Natural Heritage Plan. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia. • ' ' .. Appendix A -Maps and Figures ' '• ' 30 • l ~ IES ASSOCATES 1514 MUIRHEAD AVENUE OIYMPIA. WA 98502 ' • J..!4._ CEDARWOOD PROPERTY RENTON MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY = !: ii, ::; ; ,,: ..: ~ =: ' LOCATION MAP ; I ---z-- r I 'B IJ .,, / !1 '! .. I' ' ··-l • i, HU· II • • d I NOTTO SCALE ! I • • I S IEIIAS80CIATl!ll CEDARWOOD PROPERTY C 1614 MUIRHEAD AYJi, c>c :u rn OIYIIPIA,WA. RENTON MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY ... J ,1~ . I I . 'l' ;' -. •• FIGURE 2 SITE MAP ,, i I . • --:a:-- I .. I I I f------- • • II I NOTTO SCALE ::!J IES AllSOCllifllS CEDARWOOD PROPERTY g C :g "' , .. 11114 MUIRHEAD AW. -·-, --.. • . -----.--=-~c~ ·•.-,_c- OIYllP1A.wA. , .. RENTON MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY .. 'I' Ii' -,f ; FIGURE 3 VEGETATION MA ··-' I l I 1 r IES ASSOCATES 1 11114 MUIRHEAD AVENUE OIYMPIA, WA 98II02 I (206)943-ot27 ! I i . ·.!-· ._,,_ -. . : ... ~~·~· ·!= . , .. ~ .. ..... . . ::.r· .. ··:- -:·.:.7.;.~. -~;· CEDARWOOD PROPERTY RENTON MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY • .• I .... i . • • -~-.~,. ¥!1 . • •. · .. -AkF ...... .. • • • • • -·-~ . • • SCS SOILS MAP FJGURE4 • --:.i:-- .. I ! I ;1·· #~ rg IJ . ,, h 'It I , ---: 11,. wi I • • II I HOT TO SCALE · • ::!J IESASSOCIATE8 g. 161,4MU81HEADAYJ!, i • " • ~--·------ I .. - • ! ~ j :-• FIGURE& --c:--C •• ---•• •• :.,~~-- .. ' 21 . . . Ill ' ODIIP1A, WA. CEDARWOOD PROPERTY RENTON MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY ~:• . ::-··. :. , .. S'OIL CORE'LOCATION MAP·.·· DI . i ' It ' /-~-· _,,,.-'/-I .,...-I __ .., ••• _... .J • ......-r ---:i:---~---------- I --~ ......... _._.ir"-......1!11'---J n !.-~ ' t-·· ---J-- f I II I •"M : ,j• t,r --· --.---. '. NOTTO SCALE • ::!! E8 ASSOCIATl9 -. Cl";;DARWOOD PROPERTY g 11u iluilliieAi>-AYJt --- ~ OIYMl'l.l,WA. -•· RFNTON UAPI F VAi I FY HIIUIWAY . · lGURlt 8-DRAINAGE MAP, ' : ---· . ----...-.._ ·-----. ~-~~....i.:::.---__ ... . . , .. -;:; ;;cf .. :'./' . J I i • I ~ ho I ,. " • ; :z: ~ I .~~-'l' . .. . ~ l II !ft I ... -!--., .... ' i!Q· ~, . I NOT TO SCALI: . ' :!! IEIASSOCIATU __ CEDABW.000 PROPERTY g . c .•• --· • -"'"' "-·'· • • •• c··- C 11114 MUIRlll!AD ,.,,,_ - .ill OIYMPIA.WA. ••· ACNTnlll UADI C VAi I CV Uli1UWAV FIGURE-7 WETLAND MAP • ...... . ·····--. ~ . -·":": (APPROXIMATE) I '!ft·~c ~•11~1 ( ' V .-u f • • i ;; ; ~!ii H I :0 ~ m ·a :, )> g :0 l> :0 ca < 0 J'T1 :0 . .,,,) fl ! i ·, 11 ( I J j~li[ f I •·1 ~;El E E iJ f, ' fl iii g [ ,, ~ ' ~ !:! G a. I I I I I E t( f lffif, f J f r , .. "11 IESAIIOCIATU CEDARWOOO PROPERTY FIGURE 8 i5 1.114 MUIRHEAD AVE. -· .... · ! OLYMP~ WA. RENTON IIAP'-EYALl.EY HIGHWAY '.ASHINGT!)N STREAMS M~P l.°'L1----1L.-----------''-- Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site · February 3, 1995 Appendi~ B -Tables '\ ·- ....• .... .. ' 'I :t: Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site · February 3, 1995 Table 1 -Hydrologlc Regimes and Wetland Characteristics Degree of Inundation or Saturation Duration* of Inundation or Saturation Wetland Characteristics --------~--=====• ==-==-----= ==--=== Pennanently Inundated** 100% Semipermanently to > 75% -<100% nearly permanently Inundated or saturated*** Regularly Inundated > 25% -<75% or saturated Seasonally Inundated > 12.5% -<25% or saturated Irregularly Inundated > 5% -< 12.5% or saturated I ntennlttentfy or <5% never Inundated or saturated * ** percent of growing season -Inundation > 6.6 feet mean water depth Inundation < 6.6 feet mean water depth present present usually present often present often absent absent Sources: Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987. Clark and Benforado, 1981. -~·-:.·· -~--~----·· _-_,--_--.. ---~ --r-. r•--,--.~ ----,,.------ i Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site · · February 3, 1995 Hyddc Indicator Organic content Sulfltfc material Soll color Water saturation Table 2 -Hydrlc Soll Indicators * * * * ·-Diagnostic Crtteda > 50% by volume 'Rotten egg' odor Mottling * Dark soil matrix color * Gleyed colors. Groundwater table at less than 1.5 feet from the surface for a slgnlffcant period (usually a week or more} during the growing season. Sources: Hydrlc Solls of the United States. U. S. Department of Agriculture, 1991. ' .. ' Soll Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soll Classification for Making and Interpreting Soll Surveys, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Handbook No. 436. Wetland ldentlflcat!on, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site february 3, 1995 ,, Indicator symbol OBL FACW FAC Table 3 -Definitions of Indicator Status . Defloltloo Obllgate. Species that occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) In wetlands under natural conditions. · Facultatlve wetland. Species that usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67 to 99%), but occasionally are found In non-wetlands. · Facultatlve. Species that are equally likely to occur In wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probablllty 34-66%). FACU Facultatlve upland. Species that usually occur In non-wetlands (estimated proba- UPL NI ' billty 67-99%), but occaslonally are found -~ In wetlands. Upland. Species that occur almost always in non-wetlands under normal conditions (estimated probablllty 99%. No Indicator. Species for which Insufficient Information was available to determine an Indicator status. Sources: Federal lnteragency Committee for Wetland Reed, 1988,. Dellneallon, 1989. ---q· ---.------~ -------· ---:"::. -'""" . Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Slte ,~ebruary 3, 1995 Table 4 -Partlal List of Plants Sclentlflc Name Common Name ~ Agropyron repens quackgrass FAC Agrostls alba redtop FACW Agrostls pal ustrls spreading bentgrass FAC- Agrostls tenuls colonial bentgrass FAC Alnus rubra red alder FAC Alopecurus genlculatus water foxtall OBL Alopecurus pratensls meadow foxtail FACW Arbutus menzlesll madrona UPL Berberls aqulfollum Oregon grape UPL Barberis nervosa mahonla UPL Carex obnupta slough sedge OBL Carex stlpata stalk-grain sedge OBL Clchorlum lntybus chicory UPL Clrslum vulgare bull thistle FACU • . ' Clrslum arvense Canada thistle FACU ' Convolvulus arvensls bindweed UPL Cornus stolonlfera red-osier dogwood FACW Corylus comuta hazelnut FACU Crataegus douglasll black hawthorn FAC Cytlsus scoparlus . Scot's broom UPL Dactylls glomerata orchard grass FACU Dlcentra formosa Pacific bleedlngheart FACU Dlpsacus sylvestrls teasel FAC Echlnochloa crusgalll barnyard grass FACW Eleocharis palustris creeping splkerush OBL Eplloblum angustlfollum flreweed FACU Equlsetum arvense field horsetail FAC Erlgeron peregrlnus wandering fieabane FACW Festuca rubra red fescue FACU Gallum aparlne bedstraw FACU Gaultherfa shallon salal FACU Geum macrophyllum large-leaf avens FACW Gtycerla borealls northern mannagrass OBL Holcus lanatus common velvet grass FAC C 33 ---=------a.--., .•. ,:-,-,--<: '.-=""~;,: Wetland Identification, Evaluation and DellneatJon RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 ... Holodlscus discolor Hypochaerls glabra Juncus effusus Jlmcus enslfollus Lonlcera lnvolucrata Lotus comiculatus Malanthemum dllatatum Malus pumlla Myosotls sp. Osmaronla ceraslformls Phalaris arundlnacea Phleum pratense Physocarpus capltatus Plantago lanceolata Plantago major Poa pratensls Potygonum lapathlfollum Polystlchum munltum Populus nlgra Populus tremuloldes Populus trlchocarpa Prunus emarglnata Pseudotsuga menzlesil Pieridium aqulllnum Pyrus fusca · Quercus ganyana Ranunculus repens Rosa nutkana Rubus discolor Rubus taclnlatus Rubus parvlflorus Rubus spectabllls Rubus urslnus Rumex crlspus Salix laslandra Salix sttchensls Sambucus racemosa Sclrpus mlcrocarpus ocean-spray cats-ear soft rush dagger-leaf rush twlnberry blrdsfoot-trefoll false lily-of-the-valley common apple forget-me-not osoberry reed canarygrass timothy Pacific ninebark Engltsh plantain large plantain Kentucky bluegrass willow-weed sword-fem Lombardy poplar quaking aspen black cottonwood bitter cheny Douglas fir bracken fern western crabapple Garry oak creeping buttercup Nootka rose Himalayan blackberry cut-leaf btackbeny thlmblebeny salmonberry tralllng blackberry curly dock Pacific willow . Sltk~ .willow . red elderberry small-fruit bulrush 34 UPL UPL FACW FACW FAG FAC FAC UPL FAC UPL FACW FAC FACW FAC FAGU FAC FACW FAGU UPL FAG FAC FACU FAGU FACU UPL UPL FACW FAC FACU FAC FAC FACU FAC FACW FACW FACU OBL Wetland Identification, Evaluation and Dellneatlon RE: Cedarwood Site . February 3, 1995 Seneclo Jacobaea . Smllacina racemosa Spiraea douglasll Symphoricarpos albus Ta'nacetum vuigare Taraxacum offlclnale Telllma grandlflorum Touja pilcata Tiareila trifoliata Toimefa menziesll Trlfolium hybrldum Trifoilum pratense Trlfolium repens Trillium ovatum Tsuga heterophylla Typha latlfolia Urtlca dlolca Vacclnlum parvlfollum Vlcla satlva \ ,...:.,-._, '' tansy ragwort false Solomon's seal hardhack snowberry tansy common dandelion fringe cup western red cedar foam flower piggy-back plant alslke clover red clover white clover western trillium western hemlock broad-leaf cattail stinging nettle red huckleberry common vetch UPL FAC FACW FACU NI FACU UPL FAC FAC FAC FAC FACU FAC FACU FACU OBL FAC UPL UPL ,, ., ' . Table 2: Partial List of Birds American goldfinch American robin Audubon's warbler band-tailed pigeon barn owl black-capped chickadee Bullock's oriole Canada goose chestnut-backed chickadee· common bushtit common crow downy woodpecker dusky flycatcher evening grosbeak fox sparrow golden crowned kinglet great blue heron green-winged teal house finch house sparrow long-billed marsh wren mallard Oregon junco pileated woodpecker pintail purple finch red tailed hawk red-winged blackbird red-shafted flicker ruby crownea kinglet rufous hummingbird rufous-sided towhee savannah sparrow song sparrow spotted sandpiper Steller's jay Townsend's warbler varied thrush violet-green swallow white-crowned sparrow yellowthroat yellow warbler 23 Spinus tristis Turdus migratorius Dendroica auduboni Columba fasciata Tyto alba Parus atricapillus Icterus bullockii Branta canadensis Parus rufescens Psaltriparus minimus Corvus brachyrhynchos Dendrocopus pubescens Enipidonax oberholseri Hesperiphona vespertina Passerella illaca Regulus satrapa Ardea herodias Anas carolinensis Carpodacus mexicanus Passer domesticus , Telmatodytes palustrih Anas platyrhynchos 1 Junco oreganus Dryocopus pileatus Anas acuta Carpodacus purpureus Buteo jamaicensis Agelaius phoeniceus Colaptes cafer Regulus calendula Selasphorus rufus Pipilo erythrophthalmus Passerculus sandwichensis Melospiza melodia Actitis macularia cyanocitta stelleri Dendroica townsendi Ixoreus naevius Tachycineta thalassina Zonotrichia leucophrys Geothlypis trichas Dendroica petechia ·---~_..:._, ' ' ' .Table 3 : Partial List of Mammals brush rabbit chickaree coyote deer mouse dusky shrew house mouse long-tailed vole long-tailed weasel mountain beaver meadow mouse opossums raccoon striped skunk Townsend's mole Townsend's vole Townsend's shrew Sylvilagus bachmani Tamiasciurus douglasi Canis latrans Peromyscus maniculatus Sorex obscurus Mus musculus Microtus longicaudus Mustela frenata Aplodontia rufa Peromyscus spp. Didelphis marsupialis Procyon lotor Mephitis mephitis Scapanus townsendii Microtus townsendi Sorex townsendi ---.. ,a:7---- ' • I • J • • w.u--.n-d ,.ia1.ntlfl .... tlon, c ..... ~,u-tl-on and Delineation RE: Cedarwood Site February 3, 1995 Appendix C -Field Data For~s . 32 >.--_ ' '' ! FIELD DATA FORM ROUTIN~ ON-SI'1'E: nc:·rE:Rf'IINA'fION METHOD leld Investig/Jit~'1. s): .I. Van Worm,,r -Ro} b/,</ .S ·, pj1tB: · 7 / 2.t::J / Yf" ·oject:/Sit:e:Sh. 04/IDO (c..J..~..,.J;:cato:w,+ County: ~ ,'N9 >pl icon t/Owner: ( · •1•r1ms1n.:t II / Plot II l I · 1cuiled Site oescription (Optional): ,,...q . e«r./c,w 1 normal environmental conditions exist: at the plant: co111111unity? y N f explain) vegetation, soils, ~nd/or hydrology _been significantly disturbed? (if yes, explain) VECE'l'A'l'ION rlaq;t Species · Status Stratum J.t7/~'a.h'I. /(1..ir•A/-v..__ r'At!...._ Plant Species ~ • i::Lf,-~ ( 1 ro..r ~tatus Stratum 5 / ,'c.a. 'I-"-"1.. f Ac. c.L cz7,,. o -; I ; !:I fe."' i.<. .-s r.R c.. ~ 'f .... s ./.,""J a.I/.-, f"A ~ ';-1""-(Y .. .,,.1 5"'.,._,li+I..,· i I/Pl 7. • u. g', 10; ::-/YIK ... S 5",,'c.4.~"-'"'1. {I,.(/ rccri..1;. of donfinant species that are OBL, FACWV, aJlod:1?\N. r FAC. 3 3 tl1e hydrophytic v,;,oetation criteria,\ mac? flV t:lonalu: t . . /~ILS rias/Phase:fu...'141/r,,. 'f ti,uc. fc.~'f /c;,"I 1<. the soil on 1t'he hydric list? V qp the soil a Histos~l? V C!::!) " tlor.i:i:on Oept:h: ta."• pH: /7.'l· Sul:loroup: (/ 4. IJ c-.1 ./ /c. /.J <( / f.. 't e,,... //J. Undu-carm1.ned? · ® 11istic el1ipec.lon present? v I ® 'J'ux -cu re: tile ,;oil mottiud·t V ~ trix Color: .l, S 'I 5 /i. Cle.ycLI? Y © Mot-cle Colors: her hydric soil indicatorl: " llorl:r.on Depth: · / S" 11 pH: ~N l thd uoil mottlud? Y ~ trix Color: . ;1, S Y 5/3 hu1• hydr.ic soil indieato'.fs': n.') c11e hydric soil criterion a1et? v. ~ Texture: Cl.ay.,.LI? Motclll Colors: nacionale: HYDUOLOGY the oround surface !nundated? V Si · Surface water depth: the soil saturated?" V p-ch to tree ntandlng water in pit/ probe hole: inches, 4~ other ti.ald evidence ol surloce inundution or soil suturut:ion: the wetland hydrology criterion niet? Y @ nationals: JURISDIC'rIONAL DF.'rE:RMINJ\TION J\ND RJ\.'rIONJ\LF. the plant c?mmuni ty a wetl_ an·~? V ,1) _ . tionalt.t: (.'i , y CE) FIELD DATA FORM . . ROUTINP. ON-SI'fE: Dl!:'fli:RMIN./\'fION' METHOD f,'iald Investigat':;J s J: J. Van worm,,r -RdJ J,.,.,, .5 · • PJJt:e: · 7 / .z.,:, / ?"fY l'l"Oject:/Sita:Sh owll>a (ccJ.,,.~_;r:ata,wA: COIJIH:y: ·· t<.,, ,'N9 Applicunc/Owner: 'l'ransec.:t tt / Plot fl C '2-· no.1cailed Sit:C;\ Oescription (Optional): / . (!.q,aaw co normal _environiae1,tal condi t:ions exist at the plant communi ey? y N ( I f no, explain) I Urn o vt01,1etation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly dis1:urbed" y ( lJ: yes, explain J · • ' Plaiµ: Species · Status Stratum "Plant Species 1./.d /,' a. wt 1 <. r •A/Al"-: 0f_1/:: 6 • k/j. >,,,_ u. ':. :!·u1~osli tc"'/1,~··'!> ~A" 'u·. D ... t.ly/,·s :.J ·a: 'f ... df .f. ,"J Q. -( // 9· ~:.ctt .... 'iY"'""' s-,...iiitl..,· i "',;fl I 10 :- J:. fy "" ... s 5"/1'c,/u..s.,,. "'- 1•ercal\1;. cf do1dinant species that are OBL, FACWY, a~r FllC. .,,1. '1 Is t:lla hydrcphytic veoetation crit<!riol\ met? C!!...J nac.ional~: • . J SOILS series/Phase:ft.t.V"' 1/r.. l" ft,uc.. ),;....,(y /g~ '1. is 1:he soil on 1(he hycl'ric list1 Y ~ r~ t:he sail a Hist:osol? Y (!:!) S1Jb1Jraup: (/4. vc..;/,·c. P<(/c'(e.,...o It unducormined? · ~ llistic 011ipecton present? v 'l'u.x ·a:u re : . ''Ad Horizon Cup-ch: /o "' pH: ,..-;;")· 1~ the sail mctti~d? Y ~ Mdtrix Color: .)., S"' y s-/2- 0chur hydric soil Indicatcrl: Gleyed? ~ /'if'\ • Mo t1:le Colors: • 11..._'.;./ "11" Horizon Depth: ·/0 1 pH: ~ Texture: Cl.:.yed? Is the ,.ail mottl!!d·/ /df/ Y C0 MJtrix Color: / 0 'f. ~ t 3 Mat cla Colors: Uthl.!r hyaric soil ini:H,ca ors: /.:"'\ ts the hydric soil criterion met? Y, V naticnale: •• . liYDRO!.OGY Is the ground surface !n~ndatad? Y Q. · • Surface watar dmpt.h: Is ,:ha soil saturated?" . Y GiJ oep,:h to free stand.l.ng water in pit/soil proba hole: inches. Li•,: other field evidence of aurfaca inundation or ao:Ll. saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion niet? Y ~ Rationale: ls the plant ltaticnaie: • • • JURl:SDIC'rIONAL J?F.Tl?RM@'l'ION' AND community a wetland? V H • RA 'l' l:ONJU.E • ------~------ FIELD DATA FORM ROfJTINF! ON-SI'l'E D£•rJ;:RMlNA'fI0N METl-tOO ield Investig13it~:/ s l: 1 Van worn\~r -RaJ b/r-1 S -·. pj1tC1: · 7 / ;z.e, / ?~ ~ojec1:/Site;.5"J,.. Ol<JIDOJ. (C.J.4~-.Jy.cate:W,4 County: ;<,/,>V'9 ipl.ican t/Owner: 1 • •rrans~<.:t II / Plot: If C 3 icailed Site oascription [Optional): 1-<2 . <!.:t.~u..f 1 normal enviromnental conditions exist at tile plant community? y N £ exp.i:ain) v~getation, sails, ~nd/ar hydrology been significantly disturbed? ( 11: yes, explain)· VECE'fJ\'flON 'Plant Species 6. Ar ... "' rr..-o-' ? •• Sta,=us Stratum :S(,'C.a. i-"-""1. f'Ji.c• u. o·. 10.' 33 • J SOILS ries/Phase:ftA..1/,:; //,._ 'f +;iuc. f,_...,('f 11,"I x. 1:1,e soil on 1(he hyd'ric list? Y ® l:h6 soil a His1:osol? Y ~ ." t1ori%Dll Oup1:h: /S If pH: ,...-;:;"""'\ Subgroup: (/4 vc,v/,·c. /l<(f~:~e..-.. /1 Unduccrmined? · ® llistic atiipedon present? V ® 1•ux1:ure: f : tna soil mottl~d? Y ~ .trix color: S' Y fe S"jz.. CloycL!? v '°N'' Mot.le Colors: l~ :hur hydric soil indicators . . " llorizon Depth: · /(SJ pH: /.?NJ : tna soil mottled?,... Y ~ .trix Col.or: . o YI<· s/3 hur hyllric soil indil:ators: /.?I the hyi.lric soil criterion met? Y, ~ 'l'exi:ure: Cl~yoi.17 Motclo Colors: Rationale: liYDRO.LOGY the ground surface !nundated? V ~ · Surface water depth: 1 ,:he soil. aaturatt1d'1' . V 1pch to £res standing water in pit l probe hole: inches, .a,: 01:har field evidence of aur!uce inundation or soil auturation; , the wetland hydrology criterion uiet? Y /0 Rationale: . ' , JURISDlC'fIONAL DF.TERMINJ\'rlON AND RJ\TlONALF. t the plant community a wetlari~'1 Y /.JJ ,tiona.Le: • (Y • . . --:_-_. "' . FIELD DATA FORM •, . . ROUTINF. ON-Sl'l'E: D£·rE!Rl'!INA'rION METHOD Pield Investiga,t~sl: .I.Van worm,,r -RoJJ;,..1.s .. ·, p31t:e:. · 7 /2.t:J/ Yt' Pi-ojc:act/S.l.to:Sh. 041,r,,:, (C-;J.<1~.....J_}catB•W.+ County: fC.._,'N9 Appl.I.can c/owner: · •1•rans11ut II / Plot II C lf- 1)'3 cuiled Sic~ Description (Optional): / (!.q_e,(a~ ~o normal cnviron1ne1\tal conditions exis,: a r tho plant co111111uni ty? N [ J f no, axpiain) lu~ a vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been ~ignificantly disturbed~ f ( i l: yes, explain) · · · I'larµ: Species · Status Stratum ·pzl'}t: Species Statu!l St:ratunr L./.,:,1,,'a.h'f. tf~rt,vAJ~ ("Acu.. 6. ha.{<f.i,..,'J c:i """"'-1 Flf c.tu !.c;7".,.•'S tiY t«;"''~Js £]:-7u.· .. .;_{.y /.'J 7/0,u ...... {a. FIi c:.t..<, l ·a: .,...,. ·• s ,/. • "J c:t t-t /Ji] ' ,., • I I '+' ' ' 'P/ • ;:Gtr---<r.,.o-t1 s-.,.,.,1,1 .... , . ,,, ' io:· . ;;; /'( M t,L.S 5' /11' C4. / .._ ""-V" >erca[l.1;, of donfinant species that arB OBL, FACW, ~N'jr F'/\C. <./7' t :s 1:1\e hydrophytic ve()Otation critariol\ mac? V ta cionalu: · . I SOILS iaries/Phase:ft.t..v~//'<.'f f;NC.. ),;....,.{'i A,,rJ<. .:1 ,:he soil on 1'he hycl'ric list? Y ® Sub<Jrout>: (/4. uc-v/.,"c. /I <(/c~e..-o //_ Undu-ccrmined7 · 6i) ·:1 ,:he soil a Histosul? Y (!:!.) 'A" ttorizon Oupth: /0 + plf: ./.':\· Ills tic Ct>i[ledon present? Y @ 1l'UX. l:U t"B : :,, 1:110 soil mot:ti~d7_., ,/. Y L!:!.,J 1atrix Color: -<' S Y 51.l:, Cley,:11.l? yl, <'.10 _ .. Mot·cle Colors: 1 1chur hydric soil indicators: Texture: Gl.ayecJ? 'll" lforizon Depth:· /S'' pH: ,(.'\ :s tne soi! mott!ad7 Y ~ 1.1trixColor: . _;i,5y 5/;_ lthi.!r hyclric soil indica'tor!l:' Motel~ Colors: . :1 the hydl"ic soil criterion met? v. <5) Rationale: . HYDROLOGY '.s the ground surface ~nundated7 Y ~ • Surface watBr depth: ::1 -cna soil saturated?' . . Y 1epth to :trea ntand.l.ng water in p.1.t/ oil probe hole: inchas • • 1st 0 ,:na:i:-t.iel.d ev.idenc.a of surt11ca inundution or soil au turution: .s the wetland hydrology criterion niet? Y Q Rationale: . :s the plant tationa.lil: • • " ... , ., JURISDIC'l'lONAL 1:)F.TERM6''l'I0N AND community a wetlana? Y N • RA'l'lONJ\.LF. y FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SI·ri nr,;·r1-;n11INJ\.'1'ION METHOD teld Investigi;t~'1s)': J.Van worm,,r -· -r?t,S'5-t. I! ·. PJltG: · 1/2.cJ/'/r .·oject/Sii:e:Sh. (>l<JllJO (c.J .. ~.,..Jy.cate,w,+ Coul)ty: ,1::.. ,·;,v9 >plicunc/Owner: •1•rans1u.:,: 11 / Plo'C II C 5".· 1cailed Site Description (Option&!): / . <!,q_Lae.../ 1 normal en.vironimental conditions exist at the plant co1n1111.inity? y N f no, explain) • VU\}Otation, soils,· and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? (1£ yes, explain) · · VECE'l'A'i'ION l'la'rµ: Species · Status Stra-tu,n · Plant ·species j.p I.,' a. ""-t( '-r t A/Al,._ r Ac ,.,_ 6 • 7,:t,., 1,IAI J "-,., c;; .... •~ J;Y t«,,,t.1.•"l 1:Rc.. ?. a..,·>" c.:u..w,. Q r· .H ,1. .-..,. a. I J 1 f'A " ~·: .:1.1 .... -( l"' o..J S" ;,..,,1,;+1...· i PPI l(J: ( Status 1,/1,,,, 711 ,..,_ ,::i ,-,,, ... s, '-l'-i )S,\ ... s s ,, , c ... J ... ,..,_ ()...f I red~~ of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, a~N or F~c. tue hydrophytic veoecation crit1ffian 111ec1 Y (!!) rionalu: ~- Stratum Flf ct.I... f'I'{ t' ~ · . I SOILS ries/Phase: f 1<. V-" /(,,_ f fi"' <:.. f.;....{ y ~11 H. ,:he soi.l on 1'he hyd'ric list? Y ® the soil a ttistosu.11 Y ~ ." tfori:i:on Dup,:h: /0 " pH: ,.r.{ . Subl)roup: (/4 uc-,J.//c. /.l<(lcxt.'r'o /I Ur\ducarin1ned1 · ® ll!stic ap![ledon present'? v, ® 'l'u.x:t:u ra: • the soil mott.l~d7 Y e,Iv trlx Co.lor: ~, 5" '/ S-/J hur hydric soil indicators: " Hor l1on Oupth: · / tJ " pH: ~N t:he sai.l motrled7 -/. Y l!Y 1:rix Color: . .-< ,S 1 -~ 2. hu~· hyllr!c soil indj,cators: /.:\ the hydric soil criterion 111et? Y, (2!../ Cleyed? Y I A::'i Mot·c!e colors: · ~ Tex,:ure: Cl1a1yuLI? MU ti:!lll colors: Rarionale: HYDROLOGY the ground surface !nundated? Y ~ · surface water depth: ,:ha soi..l sa'Curatad'l" . Y (J1) pth to tree standing water in pit/sail probe hole: inches, st other fie.ld evidence al aurfuca inundation or soil s~tur~tion: the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y O nat::l.onale: JURISDIC'rIONAL DF.Tli:RMINA'rION AND RJ\.'l'lONALF. . ·: the plant community a wetla~? Y @ .. _ . tionale: ' · -· · _ -.- .. • ' .. ~ --------.. • • FIELD DATA FORM ROtJTINF. ON-SI'i'E oe·r£RMINA'L'ION METI-tOD l"ield Investigat~s): Van worm,'rr -. ~,·.·. . _ , p9tci: ·;/2.c:J /,. .>roj<!C1:/Sit:o:Sh. ow11>oi(c.J.,,~--'1-cata,w,4 Councy: ~ ,',>V9 / . \pp.licunc/Owner:, 1 • •1•r11ns1u.:t ti / !'lot II C i, l<l cailed S.I. 1:1) Description ( Optionl\l): / ' (! .q_ d (J e.J 10 normal cnv.ironinental conditions exist at the plane counuuni ty? N J ! no, ax plain l a v1::9etation, soils, and/or hydrology been signif;lcantly disturbed'? (.l! yas, explain) · · VECE'l'A'r ION l'laiy; Spocies · Status Stratum ·r1an1:,specie,s / Status .j.t?//a.'-'f. /(t.r<A/Al"-: rA~u. 6. fl.r,.""~ ..(,'s C.<>{'Ul'" ·U1 :,.0 s J; 'i r«"'; 4. .. s f} ;-'07 •• e ,',.: C. ,' ~ '""t a" ti< "'S ... ·a: '( ... • r ,/. ,"J .:t J; • ' J/' 9' :4.,.,,..-t,y,o,t/ S"x-,J.)f-1.., 1 • ,JP/ 10 •. ;; I~ M '~s 5" ,, • C4. J ... ,.,,_ ()..r I . ercdR~ of dominant species that are oa~. F~CW, s tlla hydrophytic vegecat.l.on crit,n·ion rnec? Y "t.l.onalu: Stratum Fife.~ f If c: '-<,_ • . /~ILS aries/Phase:fll...V,tz //,._" fiNC.. r-.-ty /,;,~ K. s the sail on 1(he hyd'ric list? Y ® s th~ soil a Histosul? Y ~ /\" Horizon Oup,:h: 4, pH: /.'.7). Sub9rout): (/4. uc..t/,·c. /1<(/t.'(CY--o //. Ul'lducarmined? · ® 111scic c1.1iDedon pre::.en1:? Y @ •t•ux tu re : ,i 1:1\a so.1.1 mot tliid? Y 0/ .Jtr.l.x Color: Jo V /( 4/_J thur hydric so.iI inbicatbrs: U" Hor.i.:r:on oupth: · s tna :1011 mottl~d? . pH: y .11:rix Color: . .:l·S Y 5"/J thur hydr.l.c soil indieatafs: s che hyd~·ic soil cr.1. tor ion Diet? v. C!eyctl? • Moci:.le Colors: Texture: Cleyetl? Motda Colors: Rationale: liYDRO.LOGY s the ground 111urface .:Cnundated? Y ~ • S11r!ac11 water depth: ,s ,:he 1110.1.1 111atura1:ec:11· . Y N ep~h ta free ntanding water in pit/ ~l probe hole: inches. is~ o~nar field ev.1.denca of surtuca inunducion or soil sucurb~ion: s the wetland hydrology criterion met? Y <J!) Rationale: JURISDJ:C'rIONAL DF.TERMINJ\TION J\ND R.l\TIONALF. s the plant community a wetlan'~? Y . €J ationa.1.e: • ,. _ • • • . . ' --. , -~ ., -- YI, (E) ' y <D FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SI'l'E Dli:·rE:RMINA'rION METHOD .eld Investigator1s): Van Wormer -(<..oJt:,..,.s ···.Date: · 7/2.o/?F ·eject/Site: Sb.t-..1 .. d (c.,.J,~..i..~cate,;/i/A County: k .',.; i ,plicont/Owner: ·1•ransur.;t U .2 Plot lJ / . ,cuiled Si t,;i uescription (Optional): ·. , normal environmental concHi:ions exi.!1'1: at '1:ho pla_nt co11u11unity? N f explain) ~ vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? (l! yes, explain) VECE'l'A'fION ' SOILS rie~/Phaso: /Vel\J /, e,.. T 'S'f...:ly "a~ the soil on the hydric list? Y ~ the soil a Histosal? Y ~ " tiorizon Dupth: /o f pH: /"."'\ t1,e .ioll mott.lud? V c..!:!....J trlx Color: . A, S"' Y s-/2. her hydric soil indicators: " Horlzon Oupth: · pH: _.), tne .ioil matt.led? Y ~ trlx Color: . ~ , S' Y 'f) hur hydrlc soil indicati6rs: /.:"\ the hyd1·ic soil criterion met? v. ~ Statu~ Stratum FA-c.. . r.A.. f /. f 14c..1.c... a~or FAC • ....<. j' CJ t Subgroup: {:/uuc.u/,·r: 1/~fft!"f.tt.•"/& Unducormined? ·· y ~ llis tic Ct>i[ledoJl pr¥ent? v ·® 'l'UX tu re : .r-r A,.,,{ y / D q ""f l Cleycd? v C['.) Mott.le Colors: I 'l'extura: Cleyed? Mottle Colors: Rationale: HYDROLOGY · the ground surface !nundatad? Y ~ · Surface wat11r depth: , i:na soil saturated?" Y N ,prh to frea standing water in pit/sol probe hole: inches. a,: oi:nar field evidence o/ aurtuca inundation or soil. suturutian: r the wetland hydrology c:-iteri~n met? Y (!'.) nat:f,onale: JURISDICTIONAL DF.TERMINA'l'ION J\ND RA'fIONALF. 1. the plant community a wetlan~'l Y C) 1tionala: • : -'·"~'-·--~ .... ': .-.-~-~---- ·, FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON'-Sl'l'E Dl\:'fER1'1Il'lA'fION METHOD F'ield Investigator!s): Van wormer -{<.,Jt:,.,s _ ·.Date:· 7/2.0/?F 1>roject/Site:..5A,ot../-..J.,~ (c~~~cate:~ Count:y: k;....., i \ppl.icant/Owner: 'l'rans1-1t:t JI .2 Plot II -, l~ca.iled S1t~ Description (Optional): .,,__ lo normal :environmental condi1:ions exist: at the plant community? N J f explain) 1m1 ve\)etation, soils, and/or hydrology .been significantly disturbed'? (ll yes, explain) VECE'l'A'rIOM Plant Species Status Stratum Plant Species 1 .. ,1"1;"'"'-t• .... "'.,,... Eflc"'-6. a 7 ,.,sf.::. c,.J/.q :.~/yMu.~Q 1/,z_lL C:.<l i.il( I 7 •• '• JI_ 'J Z I I 1 ./ f /IC i._ ~•: • "4'y>-•f11'""N )f(C., LC.WI f'AC-10." a.7 -~ {..,·, fiAu..1's. ercer:i.t;. of dominant species that are OBL, Fl\CW, a"!l,41N r Fl\C, s cha .hydropnytic veoetution critl!rion 111ec? Y (!!_) ationalu: Status Stratum FA-c... /SOILS erie~/Phase: /!Jc...; /t tr T S,;..dy '-"a :'!1 s the soil. on the hydric list'? Y ~ "'the soil a HistosQl? Y Cf::) A" Horizon Dupth: / $ .+ pH: "' tile soil mottled? Y @ Suboroup: F/IJ..Uc"'-'/,c /1.._//o)(.e.•.,/{s undut:!lnnined? · y (0 lli:Hic llt>iD,edon present? y .(!!;J 'l'llXCUl"e: Z..tJJet -V ,5.A"'"'{. Cleycd? f .;.I,~ atrix Col.or: . 2 S Y S/) char hydric soil indicators: Mo t·cle Colors: t I...:..} 11" ltor.i.zon Dupth: · /0 pH: ,<.'l s cne soil. mottled? Y ~ .itrix Color: . ,:l, S ·y S/z.. . thl.!r hydric soil indicator-': /I s the hy..Jric soil criterion met7 v. f...!i) Texture: C.ll!yed? Mot clc. Colors: Rational a: HYDROLOGY s the around surface !nundated?_Y ~-• surface water depth: s 1:he soil saturated?· · . Y 1-1 • epth co free standing water in pit il probe hole: inches, is,: other fiel.d evid~nce of surtuce inundution or soil..suturacion1 :s the wetland hydrology criteri~n.1net? Y 0 Rationale: JURISDIC~IONAL DF.TERMINATION-2\.ND RATIONJ\LF. s tha plant communi~ a ~etlan~7 Y 2f) ationa.1a: ' {Y • • ·' ' • . ; : ,-.i.J:.Lou u.n1J~ ru1tM ROUTINE ON-Sl'l'E nr,:•ri;;Rl'IINA'rION METHOD leld Investigator1s): Van Worn,er -P,.tt:,,.J_s -·.Date:· 7/z..r:;/?J' ·oject/Sitc:.5°,l"f../.....1,...,..((c~~~cate,AJA County: k,' ;'J '! >plicunt/Owner: i•rans!!t:t fl ;2. Plot U 1cniled Sit$ oescription (Optionnl): _3 , normal environmental condicions exist ac the plant co111111un.Lcy7 N f exp.lain) .s v1:1getation; soil.s, and/or hydrology .been significantly disturbed'! (if yes, explain) VECE'l'J\T ION rla.nt Species Status Stratu,n Plant Species Status Stratum .Jo/I"'"' t ~ ..... ,..,. f.A c "'-6. ax r• s ,{.::, o. It,. i::: /..J, /1'1. u. s a .. / < .,. c. .q_ & ( I 1 • .: •. .$ ,;: /,, ,.. c. .... 1/( 'J $ • .' I u,• I-,.W~ -/(~ -,; t:i-1 Y.•(1 V'<W 5, .. ,,,:/,.,_,,.,,,, f/f c ... 9,{t.f .... " ryroA.I V't. ft•.l rife.. · . ·u.. r /. Fil c.u.. :;.i-,;/..-, ftZAu.:s. fAr:..., 10 • •. rccn.1;. of do,uinant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. ,<. f c11e hydrophytic veoetation criterio1\ mei:7 Y N tionalu: SOILS rie~/Phase: ;Ue...; J, r,. T S'•.c:dy £"a~ the. soil on the hydric list? Y ~ the. soil a Histosol? Y Cf!) " Horizon Oup1:h: /O I pH: ,-(."'\ Subo.roUJ;l: FILI. u,.AJ/ ,· c 11 ... 1! oxe. .. ol& Unducormined? · y ~ 11lsc1c atiipedon presenl:? y ·@ 'l'ux i:uce: L. O ef ,t..,.. y ,9 A""1 tne so.ii mottl .. d? Y <..!:!.,; tr.ix color: /o Y f(. '1/3 G.Leyod? (If) • Mot~.Le Colors: her hydric soil indicator,: " Hor.izcn Dcpth: · pH: tn.a so11 mocc1ed1/o y1< .r/.2... v 6!J trix Color: . · Texture: C.l~yed? Mote.Li:, Colors: he1· hydr .Le soil indicators: c11e hydric soil cr:iterion n1et? y. Cf!) Rationale: liYDUOLOGY the ground surface :1:nundated?. Y i . · surface wat11r depth: ,:he soil aa1:urated?' . Y f'2I .2.0" p,:h 1:0 free standing water in pit/ oil'-p'robe hole: inches. •1: 01:her field evidence of aurluce inunduc.l.on or soil.suturui:ion: the wetland hydrology criteri~n met? Y (jiJ nation~le: . · JUR.J:SDIC'tIONAL DETE:RMINJ\.TION AND 1 the plant coP1muni ~Y a ~etla~? ~ @ ·,,:icnale: • • . . RJ\.'llONJ\.LF. ' ·, ' y ® .. ,, ,l _......, .~.uJ &.r4 ~ .L .f 1,, 4' V l\ l "I ROUTINE ~N-SI'l'E DE:·rE:RMINA'rION METHOD ' ' F'ield Investigator!s): Van Wormer~ R6it:.,.J_s ·.Dato:· 7/2.~/i'i' 11 ,·oject:/Sit:o:.5",l,t./.,...J..,.,../(ceA~,.rc,-.9hata:;A1A Coum:y: k: ,v; Applic11nc/Owner: 'l'ransi:ct II .2. ?lo-c fl '/ Jl<l c11.iled S.i t:'i' Oascrip-cion ( Option11.L): Do normal onvironinental condit:ions exist' at tile pla_nt comn1unity? N ( J f explain) lau vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology .be~n ~ignificantly disturbed? f (.Lf yes, explain) VECE'l'Jl.'r ION l'lant Species Status Stratu1n Plant Species 1 L.,1.,/J,,.,w. '(<r-<AJK• P./4c:!"'-6. Ci.7r•sl-::, o./h", !,,/fM"':,,U 1/4 .. e.4. i&...(/ ?. f6q ycc::."'"'.,..(' 1 1 • }/:.· · "J a n · 1 ) JI •\, ./1.1..w1 f JI~ "-~ .. . ·01,.*{'f "'""' ,....... . rr -.., 'a.;-~{..-, 8.-tu.ts. fA c.. io. 'erce[\~ of dominant species that are oar., FACW, an~or s tha hydropnytic vege cin;.iOJl cri 1:<!'C'ion 111e c? Y · C!) tat:ionalu: · FAC, Status Stratum rlf-c... . U.. f' { '3) t .arie~/Phase: jl)c><.J/,trr s 1:1,e soi.l on the hydric ~-1:he soil a Histosul? L SOILS tJ4~ ~~ Suboroup: r:1tA.1Jc.cJ/1'c ll<t/foX._,d/f.r Unducormined? · y (lZl PH: y @ A" Horizon Oupth: /t') d 1:na !!O.il mot tlud? / Ills tic el1ipedon, prasept? y ·@ ·rwn:ura: SA..., ol y / D q 41, C.Leyod? y ~ 1,H:rix Color: /0 Y J< t./ J •cher hydric soil inlficato~s: Mo c-c.Le Colors: · · I. ! 11• Horizon Oupth: · pH: s -en.a :io.Ll mote.Led? ·/. Y .itrix Color: . ID.ti 'I· S"t 3'- th1Jr hydric soil indicatbrs: s c11e hydric soil criterion met? Texture: Cl.ay.ad? Mut~lo Colors: Rationale: HYDROLOGY a the ground aurtaca· i~undated?. Y ~ • Surface water da1n:h:. s i:ne soil sat:ura-caa?· . Y ® ep1:h to frea standing water in pit/soil probe hole: inches.· .Ls,: ot:her tield evidence oL surface inundat:.Lon or soil.satu~at:ion1 s the wetland hydrology cr1teri~n.met7 Y 6L) nation~le:· JURISDIC'?lONAL DE'rERMINA'fION J\ND RATIONAL~ s the plant communi~ a wetlan~? ; -~ ationa.l.e: • . ' • • • .. •,· • ·' y <i) ; • , .• -·.'!-··· , 1• .L~""'"" J.J,n.&.'1i. 1• Ul'\L"'I ROUTINE ON-SI'l'E oi;:·r~:RMINA'rION METHOD ield Investiga-i:or(s): Van Wormer -{?.a tfo:,.1_s -·. DatB: · 7/z.o/FJI roject:/Si 1:e: ..5"j,,4.J;..J111i,..< (c.,..J,~~cate,;M<l Coum:y: k ,'.,..; 7 :lplicunc/Owl\er: i•ransuc.:1: II "'l fllo1: ff Jcailed Site Descrip1:ion (Optional): _.... ~ l normal environmental cond:l.1:ions exist at 1:he plane co~1111.1nicy? N If explain) vugetation, soils, and/or hydrology _been significantly disturbed? (Ll yes, explain) VECE'l'.7\.TlON fll~nt Species Status Stratum Plant Species /. · .,1.,1,,,.,lrl,. t•..-uJ..t.f f~c~ li, a rr•st-,·:. ""t q ,,/1M11,:,Q 1/4.0L C<t. i6)._(/ ?, • Status Stratum FA-c:.. . :j~ ,../; ~.w 5f•'t4.f,.._wr f Jle i.. ~·:, a., .....-1 /.,·, -f£du..1s. fA c:... io. !t'CO(l,.1;, of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. 3 the hydropl\ytic vege cat ion cri 1:urion met? y -N :ocionalu: L SOILS arie~/Phase: .,V~ "-' J, tr T :i•..Jy "a~ 11 t:he soil on the hydric list? Y ~ i t:ha soil a ffistosal? Y C!:},.J Subgroup: F/u. UcAJ/ ,•c 1./"<-ff t1X._.,,/{$ Unducunuined'! · y ~ 11is tic a11ipedon1 presr;nt? y ·@ 'l'uxturo: SA.o..\. ;I /0"1 ~ (9 1\11 • Horizon Oupth: / 'S 'f pH: /.l\ s t:ne ~oil mottlud7 Y ~ atJ:ix Color: .). • Y Y 5'/z.. Cleyad? Y H. char hydric soil indicators. • Mo t·cle Colors: · · f U" Horizon Depth: · / o '' pH;.(.'"\ Texture: $ tna ~oil mottl~d? r/. (1,) N Cleyetl? y .itrix Color: . ,;,s Y'f2-Muccle Colors: /oy;t. y~ thui· hydr ic soil indica t'o-rs. /.?"\ s the hytlric soil ci:·iterion n1e1:? v. ~ Rationale: · · :a~ ,, t 6 n fH. s tfl ~· :. F HYDROLOGY ~o ,, 1 the ground surface· !nundated? Y t:) • Surface water depth: s 1:he soil satura1:ad?' . · V (i;:J 111p1:h to tree standing water in pit/soil. probe hole: inches. · 11111: 01:her field evidence of surluce inundation or soil.Bbtura1:ion 1 s the wetland h~rol~y cri·t·eri~n met:?. y (ff) Rat:ional'r/ . C f!c.c~~d · · 412 t,(ft: ".214 a:, a JUIUSDIC'rl.ONAL 1:)E'rERMINA'rl.ON AND R.7\.'!IONALF. s tha plant community a ~a~land? V (!J;J ;ationa.La: • • • . ·• . .• .;, -"-~~_2-,.__-,a-, ~--·"'---------,. ¥."'-'SC•" • ··-.. •· ~-· • • -. -.- 1" .J..J:.J..U LIJ\.LJ\. laUltrl ' . ROUTINE O!i-Sl'1'£ D~·r£11MINA'rION METHOD F'ield Investigator(s): 1 Van Wormer-f<.ott:.,.,.s ·. Dnt:e: · 7/2.o/?.Y l'roject/Sitc:..s;l,(.,./.;.,J..,.,,< (CeAr~cate,AIA County: .. k: ;<Ir .I\LJplicimc/Owner: 1•rans1n:t fl· ., Plot fl / Jlo.1 called Si tl;l Description ( opticn111), ~ Do normal environmental. condi ticns o.xist a c tho pla_nt c,;iu~muni ty'1 N [ J t explain l laH v~getntion, soils, and/er hydrology.been significantly disturbed? t (Ll yes, explain) VECE'l'J\.'fION Plant SpGcies Status Stratum Plant Species 1 l..( ,,;., ""hf. 1 ... •Al..,.. f /lrc:,i.(.. ~. a r .... s.;. .-~ °" t"£ ~ !lta tu!l Stratum ~-iClf~."-.5U .,1,!(.IL c.~ ""'-7, • rl+<:.-. · .tl, J ' " , ./ flf e i.. ~ .... ~:t:i'f >°"'f'f V'OiV )f+"C.•, "-WI f'A C.. 10,' a.1.,...-s 1-.-, . -fi4tL.,s. 1 GrcG~~ of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or.PAC. [ s the hydrophytic veoG ta cion criterion met? Y ·N tationalu: . SOILS leries/Phase: ;Uc;J/,err '5,;dy L .. a~ Ls the soil on the hydric list? Y ~ rs the soil a Histosol? Y C!:!) Subaroup: F/c....u,'4J/,c /1,;:1/(Jxe.• .. 1& Uodutr.u,uinGd? · y di] llis tic DLlipa<1on present? y ·c!!J 'l'uxl:ure: A.t>a.,..._ '( S°((-v.f · (V 'A" ~tori:a;on Oupth: . /It " pH: l ::1 tl\e HO! .l mo t t .lud 7 ,// V N 1.strix Color: . /0 V/f. 7, 3 Cliltycd1 y, N • Mc t:d.e Colors: , '; )cher hydric soil indicators: '11" Uorlzon Oopth: · pH: /.:") t::r tl\e :.ol.l mocchid'l V ~ i.itrix Color: . / a 11 ~ j/pL lthi:r hydric soil it'id~q71:drs. £'I L::r the hyu~·ic soil cri terlon met? y. V Texture: Cluyet.l? Motcla Colors: Ttationale: HYDROLOGY ·-. ts the ground surface· !nundated? Y §r .. · Surface wat11r depth:. Cs "Cha soil. a11turatad? · · . · Y Jepth to treo standing w~ter in pit/ il probe hole: inches. :,1,ai; o-cher fiel.d evido11nca of aurt'nca inunda't!on or soil. 11utur11-cion: ts the wetland hydrology criteri!Jn met? Y <'.![) Ttation~le: JURISDICTIONAL DF.'rERMINATION J\.ND Rl\TIONJ\.LF. Is the plant community a ~etla~? ~ @ · .lationala: ·• . . • • • ..... ~:. ---_ .. ,-~-..:~-'_,.---·----- c·., • --·c...;:~~:,;:_' -~~~--~ ,:~~-,·-..ci,~- y (!) ; ~.: • , • .I. ...:0-HU Ll,n ',I'\, I* Y lU•t ROUTINE ON-SI'l'E D£·rE:RMINA'rION METHOD .eld Investigator( s l: Van Wormer -(<.o £t:,-1 s -· O.:ite: · 7/ 2.c,/? JI ·ajecr./Sir:.e:5,llf..../1..J,c.,,/ (c"""~~tat11:;1vA County: /(; ,v 7 ,plicun c/Owner: . i•ransui.:-c II ':l. Plo1: II .2.. 1 tailed Sic~ Description (Optional): ? 1 normal onv1.romnental condi r.ions exist at tho plant counnuni ty'I N f explain) vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? (1£ yes, explain) VECE'rJ\.TION Plant Species Status Stratum Plant species 1 ,( tJ fl II-hf. t u• • Al ,.... f./l C "l.. 6 • cJ. f ,..,. s ,? t :, o. //;_ o, Status Stratum ~/7wi..u,5U 1/4,,. c.ot. i&l( I ?. /tJa Se c:."' .vofct. ,,. J, ' fl( u. s J 1 l"•f'f .;.ON Jf,''c.,'+1.<.WI C "-CJ',:ai'"•(f ro# >' V:.(•-! ::ti~-.{-.·, f-tlnu..ts. fAc....10. . ,rcet\T;, of dominant species that are oar., FACW, a~or FAC. .) 3 : r.lle hydraphytic vegecur;1on criteria,\ UU!l:'1 Y · (V .r:..ional .. : . F_lf-c.. . '-:fiil, o.. t I fAc. ti.... t . SOILS ries/Phase: ,/1/e N /, e,.. T '$'idy l11a ~ , t:he soil on the hydric list? Y g, Subaroup: [/tA.tJcAJ/,c /l<r//1JX.e.•d//.r Unducormined? · y i : t:he soil a Histosu.l? Y N ," Horizon Dupi:h: '.1 ,11 /S-pH: ... { 1 1:ne .io.L l mo c t.li.!d? 1 /. Y N ,trix Color: /t:> V fl. ¢,a. :h~r hydric soil indicate~~: I" Horizon Dupth: · /0 pH: ~ 1 r:.ne .ioil mottled? Y (!!,_/ ,i:rix Color: .(o \/ /t t/-/3 Jun· hydric soil indicat6fs: /.-:\ 1 tl\e hydric soil criterion met? Y, <!!.J 11is tic 011ipedon present'] y . 'l'ux cure: Gleyad? y ~ Mot·cle Colors: ~ Texture: c111yeu? Mote.Lill Colors: Rationale: HYDROLOGY .' 0 the ground surface !nuru:latad?. Y ~ • Surface wa-cor dap1:h: 1 i:he sail aa1:ura1:ed?· . Y N 1p1:I\ -co tree atand.1.ng water in pit/ l probe hole: inches. ~•1: 01:tiar ~.1.eld evidence ot aurtuca inund~tion or soil.sucurution: ); t:he wetland hydrology criteri9n met:? Y ~ nation~le: · ' . ; JURISDIC'l'IONAL D£T£RM1~TI0N l\.ND i the plant communi~y a ~etlan~? V ~ RATIONJ\LF. 1tiona.11i: • .4:, ~ .. • ;,· f , . . ---,~-~-----~--_-•. -~-JL- FIELD DATA FORM. ROUTINE ON-SI'l'E: ne·r£RMiliA'1'I0N MC:THOD Pield Investigator(s): Van Wormet'-f?.oJJ,,-J_s ···.Dute:· 7/z.o/?i" .>roject/Sit:o :S..l<t./-...1 ... .,,.( (c~~~cat:e•Jv,q County: k .. ..,.Jr \pplicunc/Owner: 'l'ransl!i.:t II ?. Plot r, .J . l~cuiled S1c~ Description (Optionn1J: .:::::r · lo normal onvironrnental conditions exist at the plane cou_imunit:y? N J f expla:1.n J lau vagecation, soils, and/or hydrology been signif~cantly disturbed? (1! yes, explain) V£CE'l'ATI0M. l'lan-c Species · Status Stratum Plant Species / Status Stratum ., ,, /111. wt. t t .. c,u "'" fA c ,.,,_ 6 • u l r• s {-t J. .,_ //, ~ rft<"--. • ,:t/i,v,.u.}U'f/¢ ... e.4. i61...(/ ?.a ,-,'(yi,-11.,.J rc/t"'S fA<"'- :j.'1 ,..t·;; /,,,.; J' ,•t,,. ./ u.wi f If~ "-~·:. {. f 'A c:... 10; a.; ..... $ .-, 6.,vu...'s. erce[\1;. of dominant species that are 0Bt, FACW, -a~r s tlla hydro(lnytic vegetation crit:1H·ion utet? V .. acionalu: FAC. SO!LS erie~/Phase: ,tf.)c,.J/,err S•.Jy l11<2~ s cha soil on the hydric list? Y ~ ~ the soil a Histosol? V (]!,) 11." tlorizon Oupt:h: /0 II pli: ,, tl\e soil motclud·/ · V N 4trix Col.or: ;i • S" Y Jl' S-/ L · char hydric soil indica'tors: · U" Horizon Oupth: · pH: £\ :s tt\a sell moccl~d? 1s V c_v .itr.l.x Color: ~, S-y' S, 2-· ~h,n· hydric soil indicato s: /:.'\ :s cl\e hy1h·ic so.il criterion inst:? v. ~ S1,1b(JrOup: F/c....uc.u/,·c ll"'tldxe.•ol& und..,ccranined? · y ~ lllstic Ctl.l.t)Gcton presen-c? v ·@ 'l'ux~ucc: Lt:J<:r.-( r<1-uol 1 . Cl.:.ycd? y I<:'[) Moci:la Colora: · · 'l'extu~e: 5>1 ... .i y I o4. ..., Cleyec.l? y c[) Motcl11 colors: Rationale: ·~ HYDROLOGY • the ground •urtace· !nundated? Y j· · surfacca watar depth: 11 ,:he soil aa turatad? · . · V M 11 p,:h to free· stand.ing water in pit oil probe hole: inches .• 1111: 01:nar field evidence ol aurfnca .inundnc~ or so.il.suturat:l.on: s the wetland hydrologt criteri9n met? Y Qi.) Rationale: ,· JURISDICTIONl\L DF.TERMINl\.TION l\.ND RATIONALF. s the plant ccmmuni~ a ~atlan~? V J;;\ . :ational1u ' (Y ,._ .. . • • • • ,. __ ~--;. "-;-·· ~---~-.;: , .• _.ap--2 .. -.... • . ; FIELD DJ\.T:l\. FORM ROUTINE O!i-Sl'l'E DE:'fE:RMlliA'fION METHOD ield InvestigatorJs): Van Wormer-f<.~£t:,.;..s· ··Oat<:!: ·7/2.c,/FJI rojec-c/Si ta: .5'J~.µ.JitJc..f (C~~~cate:;41,<1 County: k ,' ,v f ,1plicunt/Owner: . •1•ransi:t:1: fl -'· Plot fl e.,1 ; ltailed Sit~ oescrip1:1on (Optional): .=;;' / > normal environmental condition,s exist at ttla pla.nc com111unity7 N !f explaio) ,~ vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? (l! yes, explain) VECE'l'A'rION Plant Species. Status Stratum Plant Species / ,1,,/J•lrl. t•ruJ"'• f/fcr..e. 6. u.1r•sf.::, a.I{," Status Stratun1 f Ii""·"':, 0 'j /4 w. C4. i6/...( / 7. • { J ¢ IL I ./ f If(! C,.. ~•: • a11"•fY"'"""' 5f•''-4 '"-"" f.'Ac... 10.-:::t; ..... .,.f..-, fiAl!.ls. ,rec~~ o~ dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. Flf-c:.. · che hydrophytic vegBtntion critl!rion 11111c? Y N tionalu: L.SOILS rie~/Phasa: /VC i,,J /,tr-7 $''1..J '( d<Z ~ -cite soil on the hydric list? Y ~ -che soil a Histos~l? . Y ~ • N Horizon Oupth: . / r 'PH: /.i\ Sub<,Jroup: F/u Uc.cJ/ i <: 11 ... ,1 cxe ... /& Undurc:n111nea? • y dZ) lllstic c11ipedon, present? YI ·@ 'l'Ull Cure: S° 4,v..{ r /'"¢ A-( Cleyac.l? y ! .....-if'l • Mot·clo1 Colors: CJ Texture: Cleyec.l? MotclB Colors: : t11e soil mottll.!d? · Y ~ 1:rix Color: . ..1, S )' S/J :her hydric soil indicators: " Uorizon Oupth: · / 0 pH: ,?.\ thl! soil mottled? Y (.!!) tr ix color: . ::, ,s Y . s-/ 2. · hi:1· hydrlc soil -indicator,:' the hyd1.·ic soil cri 1:crion met? v. ~ Rat~onale: liYDUOLOGY the ground surface !n~n~atad?_Y ~ · Surface watar depth: the soil saturated?" . V ~ pth to free standing watar in pit/soil probe hole: inches, •• 01:ner field evidence of aurtace inundation or soil.saturation: the wetland hydrology criteri~n met? Y ~Rationale:. JURISDIC'rIONAL DETERMINATION AND RJ\TIONJ\LF. i the plant community a ~etlan~? v_ £) ,tionalu: • c;/ . .. '" .. • t I • FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SI'l'li! !lE:'fE:RMINA'L'ION METHOD Pield Investigator1s): Van Wormer~ f?.otJ:,.,_s ·· ·. O.ite: · 7/2.o/ ?F !'raj act/51 te: S..lo(.-t'-..1,e,,.,/ ( C c.J,~~ cate: ;k/A County: k; Ni J\pplicun c/Owner: 'l'ransi,ut II '2. Plot II _,,. . o~cuiled Sita Description (Optional): ~ ~ . Do normal environmental condi1:ions exist al: the pla_nt co,niuunity? N I J f explain) llil:! VL!!!)etation, soils, and/or hydrology _been signif.icantly disturbed? f (1£ yes, explain) VECE'L'A'fION /. SOILS erie~/Phasa: ;t)c.t,,J /,er-7 '5q,,,,dy t1t:1. ~ s tile soil on the hydric list? v· ~ ~ the soil a Histosol? Y (!j) A" Horizon Dupth: / C> " pll: ~ ,. 1:1,e !loll mottlud? JI Y U-/ latrix Color: . /o Y ft T 12.. ,char hydric soil indil!ators: U" lfor.i.zon Oupth: · ' pH~ s tne !iOil mottled'! /o y fl..'// 2.. ~ N .itrix Color: . . · thar hydric soil indicators: A s ~Ile hyu~·ic soil cri tar ion met? 0.:) . N Sta 1:us Stratum Fl'fc:... (,. A <:. '-v /?//. c: Cl./ Subaroup: F/e,,. uc,c,/ ,· c 11"<.tf oxe.••ltr Undutarmined? · y i IUstic 011!pedon prEUlent? y . •J1oxt:ure: • 'I ,?I") Cleyad? y · ~ • Mot·cle colors: Texture: Cl,;,yeu? Moti:lo Colors: v(B Rationale: HYDRO.LOGY s the ground surface !n~ndated'l. Y /0 • Surface wator depth: s the soil saturated?" . Y c::;?. epth to freB atandlng water in p.it/aoil probe hole: .inches. · .1st ocher t.ield evidence of aurtuce inundution or so.11.s~turation: s the wetland hydrology r.iter ~n met? t;;) nation~le: . __ ,......,_. .... ~-~·h:.i..:;~~c~<~.·:i;....-1~~;::__.~L_.i.,;_:.7.~;:._·...1,.~.!2.,.JJi..z.!;:~;;.J~f JURISDICTIONAL DF.TeRMINNrION AND JUI.TIONJ\LF. s the plant co111111uni~ a ~etlan~? Y G) · .,. ationale: • · · .. ·• ... 1 / JiLb ----.frL D • :' .. • • • ... --~-f ... P~--.:~, ~-~~;;.+~:~~--.,_ FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-Sl'l'~ nr,:·rE:RMIN.A1'IqN METHOD leld Investigat:or( s): Van Wormer -/!,u. S St Ii ·, Ont~: · // 2. J> / ;r 5,;. ·ojec-c/Sit:c:.5",l,i../o1...1..,.,..{(c~>.-b.{lhate:M4 Count:y: k,"P 1 . 1plicun c/Owner: •1•ransl!ct U 1 Plot U / • 1cailed Sit$ oescription (Optional): . :::;:, "1 1 normal ·environmental conditions e:llist: at tho pla.nt conuuunity? N f exp.lain) vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology.been significantly dist:urbcd? (lf yes, explain) VECE'l'l\.T ION ' Plant: Species Status ·St:ratum Plant Species 1 ,(,,/,•/fl. hi. f t ,-CA/_.,. , f/f C ..C.. '6, U. r ra S {. ," !, O. /1, '11, s:: /..J M u.5 a <; /It(. IL C <It. ;&... ( I 7. "tf,(Ut.., ,: u 1~ s. I,, ( r~ ..... 1 If 'J / ./ U /\ I J,.,.,. 1 ;~wJ Jf.'t .. u.wr fife:"-f:.Al..uus l"IA..i, ... '! Status Stratuni .C-.,+c., . I f,:-11, Cl. "O flf-C , 1 fA c:... 10,' rcc[\t;_ or aomini.:,c species that are OBL, Fl\C 1:11e hydrophytic vege cation cri t1H'ioo a1e c? tionalu: nd/or Fl\C. 5 7 t N . SOILS ries/Phase: ;Uc ,.J j, e,.. T '5,;,.Jy !. t1a ~ the soil on the hydric list? Y ~ Subgroup: F/c.,, U c.cJ/ ,' c //-..// 0 X'-• .,/[s, Undutoriuined'l · y i -che soil a Histosol? Y CB) " Horizon Dupth: 3. 11 pH: /.7'\ tile e1ol.l mottlud? , / Y <,!!.,I trix Color: . /o Y }( 2.( / · hor hydric soil indicators: 111s tic 011ipedon present? 'fl . '1'UX1:U1"B: · Gleyad? y f ~ Mo t·,1e Colors: · l....'.!.J " Hor .i zon Dopt:h; · / !, pH.%':""\ t:he e1oi.l mottled? ./ t...:!_,; N trix Color: . .A IS y· S"t L Texture: Cleyei.l? y @ Moti:lo Colors: "5' I;< y/y- ho.11· hydr 1c soil indicat"ors: /"'\ tl\e hydi.·ic soil er.I. terion met? (:!;...). ti national<!I: . -- HYD1t0LOGY ·the ground surface· !n~n~ated?~ GtJ .. · SurfacG wat:or depth: -cha soil saturated?' . N • pth to £ree standing water in pt/soil probe hole: /t) 1nches, •to-char tield evidence oE surtuce inundation or soil.auturbt.l.oni the wetland hydrology critaripn met?~ N Rationale: .. JURISDlC'tlONAL DETERMINATION J\ND RATlONJ\.LF. the plant ccmmunL~ a ~etlan~i@ ~ _ tiona111: • _-:c,-*'..,!~ •_:..-;-,,_-;,. ._-..;,.-_.,_-:,:;.,t~~-" - ' .. :.: : • . . ":',: ... _-- . ' . FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINP. ON-SI'l'E nc:·rE:RMINA'rION METHOD l'i eld Investigator( s): Van1_ W~rm ~ .;1. u <;p .. II . oa 1:C!: / / 2 z...( ?S- Projec-c/Si te: $ h,vL,..., .,.J(Cc.AO-'cate ,t,.,;{ County: ,A,' ..v l . A1,plicunc/Owr1er: J.. c ,v,.;c,,.J µ,J •ransi,1.:t 11 ', Plot II llu cailed Si.~ Description (Optional): ...:> 7 Jo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? y N [ J f no, explain) M" tho vegetation, ·soils, and/or hydrology .be.en si9nificantly disturbed? f.,): N 1;.f__;es, ex_~~:1?; Fa i-m e. J -I{~, Id-(! "'1 <:. cz... . · VECE'fJ\.'fION I Plant $pecies Status Str.iu:um Plant Species · Status Stratum .• ')YlaftLS I Sf. ,. .... ~~"' 6 • .,;-/7J<,1."') ~/,rc..e... c......(( ! . .(.<t,vU.., C...._ US l'f 1 .., f'i\ ?. • ( 1.µ/:1A.-r ,,~ .. ,,......... ffiC.11,. u. : . rA <! S'e ,} "< -..,.{ <I. L.A. (I •l'. , • ~ · 10; •ercon.t. of dominant species that are 00L, FACW, s the hydrophytic veoecation crite.-ion mec? V .:1 t.i.analc: FAC. ...< :S--t eries/Phase: /l)c.w b{i-f s t:l1e soil on the hydric list? u -cha soil a Histosol? A" nori::.on Dopt:h: /o ,z tne soil rnott.l.od7 l.// V y pH: y SO!J.$ .su'b<Jroup: ,:/1./.11 ~..,/;c. fl« p/o;(el-olls Undu carmine'd ~ • f y (NI 11istic C!L1ipadon. presGnt? Y I© 'l'Uxture: Lo t:C ~ r 54 ... -( / C.l.l!lyeo.l? V ® dtrix Color: /t> '(_/<. (/L chur hydric soil indicators: U" Horizon Dopth: · /o 1, pHk"I >J tne :.oil mottled'/ :6'} et_./ N .itrix Co+or: / o v /l / .2... tho~· hydric soil indicat rs: JC\ :ii the hyuric soil. criterion rnat? V N • Mot-i:le Colors: Texture: 5"'-"'./y /eqA-f Cluye<.17 v Mut~il!I Colors: f;' y ~ 'f/y nati·onala: KYDJ10LOGY a the 9round surface inundated? Y. (iZ) · Surface watar·ctepth: ~ -cha soil saturated? Y a£) 4p-ch to free standing water in pit/soil probe hole: inches. iat ot:nar field evidence ol surtaca inundation or soil saturation: 11 the wetland hydrologt criterion me1:? Y c} na1:icnale: JURISDIC'!IONAL Ol~'l'E:RMINJ\'l'ION l\ND RJ\.'flONJU.F. 1 the plant community a wetlan~?~ __ Y G) __ litiona.l.e 1 • . - (!). FIELD DATA FORM ROCITINF. ON-SI'1'.I? DE:'rE:ID1INA'rION METHOD leld Investigatorf s): Van, wq:r;n111r • Date· ·; / 2 z/ 7 S- ·ojec-c/Si 'CO: S h_w..., nd(CcAt"~ ~cato,t,u,'\ County: A/ Al i iplicunt/Owner: •rrans11,;t: II • Plot II . 1 cailed Sir~ IJescription (Optional): ..3 rf' , normal environmental c:ondirions exist f no, uxplain) 11 t the plant co1n111uni ty1 V N \!.i t:ho ve\]e ta tion, soils, J · N (.l J: yes, explain l and/or hydrology been si nific:antly dis-curbed? d Jo" ht e. J -. «: • ; " ""' c:. "-. . VJ?Cl?TATION t>larit ,Species · 1status Stratum Plant Species ,P_/zk /11 r :, d'"'""<f • f"At:e.i 6. P.t2 "'"' ,tJ e. v. ! <.< $ ac f• •S f AC ...; ? • Jt,/(ILS' Ltr"I/O. ,._!; f/#,C. u. /T ,f. Status Stratum 10; rcor,.1;. of dominant species that are oar:., FAC~nd/or FAC. /c:R:i · tha hydrophytic v,;,l)etation c:ritario1\ me1:'1 (V N clonalu: . ries/Phase: IV c. \-U b ~ r-/ -che soil on the hydric list? SOILS 35 Suboroup: r:.. II.( V4 ,u /:, /14 p/(J xe 1-olls Undu-ccnn.1.ne'd? · fy r1f\ · -che soil a Histosul? ." tiorizon Oop'Ch: /, v y V pH: II.LS tic cl1.Lpedon present? v I © •ruxt:uc-e • L. o d""""" ~, : t1,111 soil mottlod? /. tri>e Color: /6 V /l ~ I har hydric soil indicators: V cv Cleyer.1? · · v l@ , Moc,1111 Colors: d Horizon Dupth: · Lo <t """- th.a soil mottl1a1d? , A trix Color: /0 V fl. '/'1 i... pH,%?'\ LY N Texture: c. /4 y C.Leyeu? .. y '!, l /(. Y/f her hydric soil in'1icat6rs: Moti:le Colors: the hydric so.il criterion met? Ra ci_onale: HYDUO.LOGY : the ground aurtaca :Cnundatad? Y N • Surface wat11r depth: 1 ,:ha sail aat:uratad7 t1') H ,p,:h to free stand.i.ng water in p!t/soJ.1 probe hole; /tJ inches. 8 ,: 01:her f.1.eld ev.1.denca al surfuca inundut:ion or soil sutur~cJ.on: .: the wet.land hydrology cri teri'on met? -0 H Rationale:- 1 the plant ,tiana.l1u -,, ·-. -:.·.¥,. , • • . . . . RA11'IONALF. JURISDIC'l'IONAL DETERMINATION AND C?mmunity a wetla~'l@lf~ . ·_ . ~:_ ·~·, • . . . FIELD DJ\.TJ\ FORM ROUTINE ON-SI'rl? Dl!:·rE:RMil'iA'rION' METHOD l'ield Investiga1=or(s): Val\ Wt;!1:lll~f -~1<. 55"" /(· .. ·. Date!: ·J/2 :z.../?.5- l'roj ect/Si ca: S h,.w..,.,..J(Cc.N~ ~cace ,t.,.i~ County: ,;(/A.I 'l n.pplicun t/Owner: Transuct N 3 Plo,: II · ~ q. lt.!tuiled Sic~ Description (Optional): 'il!IIIF" / lo normal environmental condi cions exist at tha plant co111111uni ty? y N . J f no, explai11} . 1<\I! tho v1:1oetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ',) N <;; :.;'e~, e~plai;_~ f & ...-m e. J -i'Ja 'rll,) . }':'.q M · VECE'l'A'fION . . l'lal'lt Spe1cies1 / Status Straturn Plant . /~i...~ ... s d(.:sc,;rot-, F~<:.'{ 6. ,. A / "' 1,1.. s. . ,.. "-L ~ G. . . {" ,'(. <: 7 • • ·J(,1""q"'c..._/u.J. V'•(•·".S f/4-cLa u,. : l kA.. ~ ,-,• ._ .a,.".., J.. f A c41 it· Species Stat:us Strat:um ercaRt of dominant species that are OBL, FAC~nd/or s tlua hydrophytic veoe ta tion cri eurioll roe c? N "'1:.ional1.:1: arias/Phase: /Ve.IV b-tr-J s -che soil. on the hydric list? :,.1 -cha soil a Histosol.? SOILS ~~ Subaroup: ,:_ II< 11 ~.., / ,c. fl""'/'../"'/ e 1-o Ifs Undu1:or111in6d? • Y rfi} · n." tioria:on Oupth: /"' +' pH· lliatic cpipe.don present? Y © 'l'ux t;U t"G: .L c, 't. Jc.\. /, :s1 tile so.l1 mo c t.Lud? 2../ .strix Color: / o V /€.. 6) H Cleyeu? v' CR) • Mot·de Colors:5' 'f /: 'f /'f char hydric soil irldicators: u•• Horizon Du[)th: · Is, pH~y N s tne ~ail moct1ed1 ~ (.,!_) .Jtrix Co~ar: / o Y. {(.. .3" / Texture: L ~4-. y c:../« Y. c1eyeu? . · y ~ Mote.le Colors: S '( t<YIY tht.!r hydric soil inaicato s: A s tile hydric soil cri1:erion 111a1:? (!;) H Rationale: . HYDllOLOGY s 1:ha ground surface :1:n~ndated? Y. 4) • SurfacG watar ~e[)th: s -che soil saturated? 11'}~ ,u1.-ch to free 21:anding water in ~/soil probe hole:~ 11 inches • . ia~ o-cher fiaid evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: s t:ha wetland hydrology criterion met? (!J M 0 Tlat:io~ale:- JURISDIC'tlONAL DETERMINATION J\ND RJ\.TIONJ\LF. 11 t:he plant community a wetla~ ... ? Z). N a1:1ona11:1: ' .· c:./ ., .. . . --.. ,. ·.L-:-<.:..ip''·~· .. ' •• • FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINE ON-SI'tE ni;:·rE:RMlNJ\.'fION METHOD .eld Investigatoi:;( s): Vap Wormer -/?tt-rs .... f/ , 011ta: ·oject:/Sit:o: C <! d.tt,,... woo<f Seate,; County: 1plic11nt/Ownar: ,/..c ,v_,.}p,J L</v,lf1•ransl!t.:t II ,;-/ Pi Plot // .rniled Sit:1;1 uescription (Optional): .,,,o1 e.. •' normal environmental candit:ions exis'C at the plant co1111111..mi'Cy? y N f no, explail\) s tho vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology .been significantly clis"Curbed? N (ll yes, explain) VECE'fA'tION Species Status Stratum rcer1.~ of dominant species that are OBL, FAC~nd/or th.a hydrophytic veoacut!on cri1:1H'i01\ 1uec? CV N t.i.onalu: F'AC. t • 1 I I )<• __j SOILS des/Phase://-~<!,. wo~..( ~ • TS". IP J:,v),~c._ (}u.. ... ac..J.. .. .._f'.f.l SUb!JrOup: Dy sfr ,~<:.. )( c. ..... ck '"IS t:ha soil on the hydric list? y/ (ID UndutoTiained? · y 1:he soil a Histosol? V 0J '' Hori:aaon Oup,:h: 6, " pH: A') uistic opipedon present? y / N •11 ux i.:.u ~o: Cleyeu? v 1Ar\ tl\e soil mott.Lud? ,J/ V l.!!/ crl,c Color: /<:, y /< -, 2.. Moc·cla Colors~ U ,er hydric saii ind~cators: '' Hori:aaon Depth: · ./~. pH: ,<."I th.a soil mottled?~ V I..!!./ tri,c Color: . /" Y IC S-/z... lllL" hydric soil _:l:ndicators: ,,.;:;"\ the hyliL"ic soil cz:-.iterion met? v. ~ Texture: c1eyet.1? Mutcle Colors: nationals: HYDROLOGY 1:ha groL1nd surface lnundated? Y ~ • Su'£'tac11 wat11io dapt:ht 1:na soil aaturatqd?' V N ~th to freo ~tending wate'&' in pit/ 1 probe hole: inches, at ot:har fieid evidence of surluca inundut:ion or soil suturbl:ion: the wetland hydrology criterion m.et? · V tr;) Rationale; JURISDIC'llONAL ~F.TERM&TIOK 2\ND IU\TIONAL~ tha plant community a wetland? V tionala; • · - ;-. ... -. -·-~--~--,,. -:-=-J-_--. ~ ..... ~,,, ' . ve) • • • FIELD DATA FORM ROUTIN~ ON-sr·rE or,:·rE:Rl'IINA'rION' METHOD 'ield Investigatoi;(sJ: Vap wormer -/Ze,.r-s.,,,.~ ·· . Onto: 'rojec,:/Sil:G: (! c d.,v-woo<( Stata:•, County: pplicunc/Owner: J.~.,./,,.Jp,,.} J:,..tv~;f1•ransi,~1: IIJi-/ a Plot U ucuiled Sit~ Description (Optional): r 0 1 ~ o normal environmental conditions exis,: at the plant co111 munity? v N Jf no, explain) u:. the vo=gecacion, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? N (li yes, explain) VECE'l'J\'flON Stratum Plant Species Ffl. <. 6. Stat:u$ S1:ratun1 fJ(~u_ ?. .. fJI Cf/.. U. t::.J c:~ •.f. I rr 10.' ~rccn~ of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, i tl1e hydrophytic Vtb\Jl3 cu tion cri terioa\ met? V ~tlonalu: PAC. t - • 1 / ../ )< _/ SOILS !ries/Phase:/fM"t.r wo~ -,'75., IP ® 1 ,:he soil on the hydric list? ~ N 1 ,:he soil a Histosal? Y \" Horizon Dopth: /d t pli: ,.-;-;-'\ JiiN./,-c.. (}u..ro .._7.. .. .,_( 'f.J Subgroup:Dys/,..,-c:. )(c..-.. ck r!S Undu r:orinined? · y 11lstic aLJipetlon prosent? v N •J'cx1:UC'B~ Ii J tile soil mottled? V "'1:!__J itr i,c Color: /o Y /( '( / '- c.Leyei..l? y . (!) • Mo 1:1:le Col.ors: ther hydric soil indlcators: J'' Hori:r.on Depth: · G,, pH: ,/.!I i tna ~o.1.1 mo c clad? /. Y c..!:!) ltri,c Color: . / o Y ~ S'" L thur hyarlc soil indicators: r.1 i che hy,.h·ic soii criterion 111et7 v. Q!) 'l'axtura: Cleyei..17 MU t ,:1.:, Colors:. natlonale: -HYDRO.LOGY , the ground aurfac~ ln~ndatsd? Y ~ • Surface wato~ depthr ,i the soil aa-curateel?' . Y apth 1:0 free standing water in pit/ l probe hole: inches. L~,: 01:hsr tield evidence of aurluca inundution or soil saturation, !I the wetland hydrology criterion met? · Y ~ national~: , , JURISDIC'rIONAL J;)F.TERMINl\.'l'ION 2\.ND s the plant community a wetland? Y /t0 111:ionale: • U • -!·~;,q-.-· --~~-~-:?.~---a zh~~~j·:.4.--:~:~'?',_,r~.o: .. : -~---~~ RATIONAI.F. • ' FIELD DJ\TA FORM ROUTINE ON-SI'rE: ne·rE:RMINA'rION METHOD teld Investigatoi;(s): V~p Wormer -/<.urs~!/ . OiltC!: · /-.2.,P/?.r- ·oject/Sitll:C: e d,qi,-Woo<f Seate:·. County: iplicunc/Owner: ,/. .. ,,1.,..Jp,,J J:,.!ve1f1•ransui:t u,../. Plot If :;:, 1 cai led Si t'll oescription (Optional) : ...::vofQ.... ...:;, I normal crwironrnental conditions llXiSt at t:ho plant CQ111111uni ty? N f explain) vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology .been s~gnificently disturbed? (ll yes, explain) VECE'l'J\'f.ION Status Stratum F/4< Plant 6 • Species Status Stratum • f.A<" f/4 C. 7. • u. 9·~ 10: rce~t o! dominant species that are OBL, FACW~rid/or thll hydrophytic Ve!)ecui;ion crit1n·1·on met? CV N t.i.onalu: FAC. rie~/Phase :/tU-e.r wo,./ · J<,• f S".f S@O.ILS I;'N ../,~._ ,e,.._ ,.., c. A .. "'-f './-J Subgroup:Dysf .. ,·c:. )(c:. .... e-' riS the soil on the hydric list? N Undutor1111.ned? · y • the soil a Histosul? Y N " Horizon Dupth: 7' pH: ~ tris tic opipedon .Present? y• N ,·uxturo: · Cleyed? y f ,-r;;::.. • Mot·c.l.e Colors: ~ tJ\e soil mottlud? Y ~ t:rix Color: /o V /IC.· :z..l / her hydric soil ~ndicAtors: •• Hor.i:r.on oupth: · /S'" pH~ " tne ~oil mottled? "-.!.) ., trix Color: 10 'f l's '3/2... hut· hyllric soil .indicators: the hy1.h.·ic soil criterion 111et? v. N Texture: Cl~yeu? s '/ I< 'f /'I- Mu t clu Colors. na.tionale: HYDRO!.OGY the ground surface fn~ndated?~(JL) · surface watar dap~hl ~ha aoil aaturated?'. N pth to :tree stand.ins:, water in p t/soil probe hole: t :inches. at other field evidence o:t surlaca in~ndation or soJ.l aatu~ation1 the wetland hydrolagy criterion met?~ N naticnala1 • ' JURISDIC~IONAL DF.TERMINl\TION J\ND the plant ccmmunJ;ty a wetla~'l (J) H tiona.i.u • . • RA'flONl\LR . : -~.; __ -_ -. • y CE) ' . FIELD DATA FORM ROUTIN~ ON-SI'l'E DE:'rE:RMINA'L'ION METHOD 'ield Investiga-coi:;(s): Vap Wormer -f?t.,.s,s.c..(· •roject:/Sitc: ~ <: ~q_i,--W<>otf Seate,·, County: · ca ta: · 1-.2.;:,/?..r \pplicun c/owner: L,. ,,,;_,.I p,.J .t:,..lvet/'l'ransec'C 11 Plot: II l..icailed Sit:~ Oascr1pt10n (OptionHl): . S_/o. ("- lo normal environmental condit:ions exist .at the plant conuuunity? N Jf no, explain) ra~~ vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? • I..!::!..) ( i 1:· yes, explain) · · VECE'f.l\'fION Stratum ffl...C Plant Species 6. Statu!l Stratum f"' c... ?. II • ,f. 10.' • • • arcc~~ of dominant species that are OBL, FA~d/or FAC. ,I,~ :1 1:1,0 hydrophytic veoetat;ion crita't'i·on niec'i' ~ N .:stlonalu: · II I I ./ /./, f SOILS ar1es/Phase:1t/.-,(-t,-W<>• • /\, s~f £.,.,'.J,-... )o .......... 4 .. ""( '.{.j SubCJroup: Dys f,. re. )( c. .. ., c.&: r is Unducormined? · y tlistic c.t1iperJon prase}ltJ y N 'l'uxt:ura:,/..oet....._f ~,,..( !, ,i t:l1e sell on the hydric list? @ s ,:he soil a Hist:osol? Y ~ J\" nori:r:on Oupi:h: to f pl~ ,i tile sell mo c tled? ..:!__; N atrlx Color: /O y J!. Jlz.. CleyerJ? · · y '® • Mo ti:l~ Col~rs: s-y f( · 'f lY ther hydric soil indlcators: u" Hor .i:r:on Depth: · . pH:<.'"\ s t:ne ~oil mottled? c.:t_; N Texture: •• .itrixColor: /dY/( '//L ther hyc.1ric soil _tridicators: CleyetJ? _ Motel.:. Colo ... ~: 7, s-y IC '//J, :s the hyd1..·ic soil criterion n1et? v. N nationale: HYDRO.l.CGY 1 the oround surface fnu.ndatEld? :t.'\ <HJ' · Surlacq wat11r dein:hl q ,:he soil saturated?". CL,/ H ,,. !pi:h to fre11 standing water in pit/soil probe halo:/ inches, la,: o,:her field evidence o~ aurluce inundution or soil autu~a,:ion1 1, the wetland hydrology criterion mat? cf) N : naticnale: . :~ the plant ationale: . , JURISDICTlON·AL· ~R.a,· .. !NATION J\ND community a wetland7 ,Y N • ~.:,, .. -.---.. _- • --~1=,~ -~4~~"'-·--?~_.,~i:~.~~.,iri:R/~1::-:.:-·-- RA'tlONJ\LF. ' , . ' -.-----. -_-~ .. ~,,:-__ - ® FIELD DJ\.TJ\. FORM ROUTINF. ON-Sl'l'E oi;:·rERMll'IA'r!ON METHOD eld Invest;igat:oi:;Cs): Vafl warmer -/?ts.s,~f ajec,:/Sii:o: C ~ et«JI'-woof scat:e,, Coun,:y: plicunc/Owner: J. .. ,v,,.Jp,J J:,J11,tf1•rans~.,,: U / Plot II cailed s~ t~ Description C Optional): Ji of c- · Date: · /-,:Z,;,/'f.S-. s- normal erivironmental conditions exist at the plant: communi,:y? y N f no, 1:1xplai1\) vugetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disi:urbed? (il yes, explain) VECE'l'J\.'fIOM ~ a,it: Spec.i,.es / Stat.~ Stratun1 Plant "'1,4 l di t C11l'd ;-r C. '<... 6 Species Status Stratum • lfca. • (~ .. ...d..-+:J .. .,... IM-'t""'~ r-1,".... ?. • Q<!..c:.-c:..;,. .:.;.._.-.~~~ I'{<:_ II,. I -1,-. I#, /.'.s, 9. ~..,..i,,L\ .Jf<-'-. 10: :co[I.~ of dominant species that are oac., FACW, a~r FAC • ...2S-t 1:he hydropnytic vege cut ion cri tert·an me t1 Y (.!!__) :.i.onalu: · , I I )< SOILS :ies/Phase://-U1!,. won<· ,• 7S4 If) t:l\e soil on the hydric list'? y/ ~ i:he soil a Hisi:osal1 Y (!!.) • Hori:a:on Dupi:h: 'f I' pH: ,-:-;-\ 5-v; .-... .l'u.. ....... z .. "l 'f.1 suboroup:Dysfr;-o::. )(c...-.. ci 1-ls Undutoriuined? · y 11.lstic c11.lpedon present'? vi N 'l'U.X.'tUCO! tl\e soil mot:tiud? c.//. V \.!:!..) .r.1.x Color: /0 V ~ // :z_ 1ur hydric soil i~dicators: • Hor.i:i:on oupth: · Cley.;,d? y '® • Mot·cle Colors: tna soil mottled'? c./'/_ pH: y Texture: C.Leyed? 11uc;r1.:, Colors: .rix Color; ( 0 Y JC. / / 3 1ur hydr.l.c soil ,inaicators: che hy<lr.1.a soil cr.it:erion me1:? v. QC) Rat;l,onaie: HYDROLOGY the oround 111.n:face :l:nundatad? Y 62) • surface water depth: ,:na ea.1.l allturatai:11· Y ©. ~t:h ta free standing WAter in pit/soil probe hole: inches. ,t other tield av.I.dance ot surfuca inundut:ion or soil saturation: the wetland hydrology c:r:L terion met?•, • y e[) na tionala: . , , JURISDIC'l"IONAL DETERMINATION AND RA'rlONJ\LF. the plant community a wetlan~? Y _. {2 tionala: • V- --~~:>,-:;:~ '~~--:---~--"""--_---· • y . ,· !>;' . . . FIELD DJ\.TA FORH ROUTINF. ON-S!'l'E oc:·ri;:Rl't!NA'rION METHOD 'ield rnvestigato-i;( s I: Vap wormer -/<.u ss ..... f ·· ·, oa te: •rojecc/Sit:e.: (! c d.,v-woo<f scat:e,, county: .pplicnnc/Owner: ,J.,..,,;,,..Jp,J Uv,,.f1•ransl!1.;t JI Plo't U ucniled Si't~ Description (Optionnl): o normal environmental condi cions exist at tho plant conuuunity? N Jf no, explain) vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology _been significantly dis'turbed? (1£ yes, explain) V ECET J\'1' ION P.).al);'t Species 1 / •/: S'tatus St;:atun1 Plant Species [{._Ii.,,_ s 'S('-"-.,._1,. •-'-f ti C 6 Status Stratum : A ; .... "-'l> "" ... 1, ... .._ . • ftf-<' 7: 7/... ... 3.a. yl:ca..i'a.. fAa u. :de:~,,_ 1'1-<.o C: .. ~,l.y //ui,,. EAdl.(. ,)', • A.c::. c.,... C:... i.,. c:..I .., "' ,tu.~ f Ac ~ 10; ?rccRt of dominant species. that are OBL, FACW and/or FAC. 1 the hydrophytic Ve\)etat:ion crit,n·.i:011 mac?(!) N ,c.i.ooalu: • 1 J 1 )< -1 SOILS 1ries/Phase :,4/;,c-e.r Wo•"' -,' TS4 19 , 1:1,e soil on the hydric list? ~ CM) , ,:na soil a ffist:osol? V ~ ," nor i zon Oup1:h: /" " pH: ..<:') . J;.',,.,),-._ j,j..._,.o,l .. c.r'f-1 Subgroup:Oy sfr-t<:.. )(c...-•c4 1-is Undt. coranined 1 · v llistic a11i(lel.lon present? V N 1l 1ux tu t"'B : r tne soil mott.Liad? ,; ,,/ V \.!Y 1tri.ic Color: /<:>'/. I' 7'/3 Cl,;,y,11<1? V ~ dD Mot,;.le Colors: :her hydric soil ina~ca'tors: f" Horizon oupth: · ~ /II pH: /.:1\ Texture: Cl~yet.J? r the ,ioi l mo c tled'? Y ~ ,'tri.ic Color: . IQ Y /f. '1/1.. Mu 1;1:le Colors: .hut· hyaric soil .ind:tcators: /1"') ; cha hyuric soil cr.iterion 111et? V, V nat~onale: HYDROLOGY : the around aurtaca !nundatad? Y ~ • Surtaca watrJr depth 1 1 tha soil saturatrJd?'. Y 'tE:) ,p1:h to· freo. standing water in pit/soil probe hola: inches, .• ,it 01:har fial.d evidence of surI11ca inunilution or soil au turration1 1 the wetland hydrology er:!. terion met? · Y <{) na1:ionale: , . l the plant ,tionale: : , JURISDJ:C'.l'IONAL DF.TERMINJ\'l'ION l\ND c?mmunity a wetlan~·., .v &) . '71-tJ !12-·o , .. RJ\'tlONJ\.LF. v(8 .. FIELD DATA FORM ROUTINF. ON-.SI'l'li: Dltrt::RMll'lA'rION METHOD '.eld Invastigatoi;(s]: Va11 wormer -f<tJ.s,s.c.f ·Datt!:· /-.2,,P/?..r ·ojact/Si1:e: (! <: e£,u-Woo'{ Seate:·, Cou1\ty: . 1plicunt/Ow11er: L"',,,;,,,_Jp,,J .,Z:,Jvatf1•rans1;ir.:t U Plot: U -#=--1 1 c ailed Si 1:e Description (Optional) : 5/ 6 q <- 1 normal environmental conditions exist at tho plant co,muunity'/ y' N f explain) v~getation, soils, and/or hydrology.been significantly dis1:urbed'/ (lf yes, explain) VECE'l'A'rlOM Pla~t Species I Status Stratum Plant Species .:r£u..J"-;t/,'c. ... 't-a. • t:A~ 6. Status Stratum ,A./rJ"-J .,.'i._t, ,..... . 'f'/1,c' 7 •• t(..u. I. 11..:. S"f.e. .. ./. .. J.: l· .J f Ac: ?: 'fo(y 5./.,'f "--.xt.u.AI,' f 11<;~ it· rec~~ of dominant species that are DBL, FAC~nd/or FAC. 7~ the hydrophytic Vc:!Je cu tion cri t1n·i·o1\ met'/ 0..,.) N c.ionalu: • 1 I ./ ,/( -/ SOILS ries/Phase :/1:/,,(e.,.. wor -,· S".f the so.ll on the hydric list? (ID ,:oe sail a Histosol? Y (!!.) "Horizon Oup1:h: (,, I' pl!: /.7'1 t:ne soil mot til!d? / Y ~ trix Color: / 0 ( /t.. '/ 2.... her hydric .soil indlcators: • Horizon Oupth; · / 0 · pH~ tne ~oil mottled? I....:!...,) H trix Color: ./ o 'I/< ,3/j hur hyiJric soil inBicatdrs: rv"\ c11e hydric soii crit!rion met:? (!:_J H !!',.,;.-._ )Q ....... d .. z ..... 1 t!J Subgroup:Dysfrro::.. )(c..-.. ct:. rls Unduccrmined? · y tlistic Cl>ipedon present? v1 N 11'UJt cuce: Cleyed? y I (;) Mot-c.le Colors: 'l'extu~e: 'SA..,.ly Co~ -4'\ Cieyed? y (ff} Motcle ~olors: S 'j'I! y/µ. Rationale: liYDllOL.OGY . the ground surface !nundated?~Gl) • Surfaca water dai:n:hr tlla soil aaturated?' . N If • p,:h to free standing water in p t/soil probe hola: , inches. s,: 01:har fiald ev~danca of surfuce inundutian or aoi1 euturu,:ion: tha wetland hydrology criterion met? d) N Rationale: .. the plant tionale: . . JURISDICTIONAL·. J?F.~E .. . . ,. ··.1'ION. ,,, AN ... D RA'l'IONJ\L.~ ccmmuni ty a wetland? Y N _·_. _ _ . ~ _, _-_ ~ ;;, -.:;"".-·::.:.:,... .. -,-~-~-.;.;~-, .-- -_ : .... FIELD DJ\TJ\ FORM ROUTINE ON-SI'l'E: DE'fE:RMil'IA'1'ION METHOD F'iel~ Investigatolj(s): VaJI wormer --/Ze,.rs .... / ·· , 001:e: · P1·ajec1:/Site: Cc d<l,,... Wo"<f Seate•·. County: /\p[)licunc/Owner: L-r,,i1.,._Jp,,,J J:,Jv.,ft•ransur.;t U.f Plot II 9' llucailed Sita, Description (Cption11l): . 5to/'-0 Jo normal ·environmental conditions exist ( l f no • .,xplain) ~u the ve!:)ecaticn, soils, ~ N (!£ yes, explain) at the plant community? y s gnif~cantly disturbed? VECE'l'.l\'l'ION · Plant Spepies /. Status Stratum Plant Species Status Stratum , . /l,~t, .. , ~. 1 c... • .... I. f)t c. "-6. !,/tu..l..11-r r(.,_c<lo-t: .'.J r:--,,. C' ?. l.~4A.>.a.-vi::. ... /u..> ,_._, • ..,~ f~cu,. U. '. ·r?.s , .... i U..,I. -t ,..,74.• r: •• ,... f .A~ lg·:· ·A:t ...,,.._) ,,...._t, ,.., FA •ercaRt cf dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC. s the hydrophyt:ic veoecution crit:l!r101\ met? Y N :a t:lonalu: . l1 I J ../ /(• J SOILS eries/Phase :rr/,t-e,, t.vo• -, TS"f s -che soil. an the hydric list? ·@ s -cha soil. a Histosul.? Y ~ A" Horizon D!!pth: ~,r plf • ,., tl\e soil mot t.led? (£) tl IJtrix Col.or: /0 Y. ~ ~.2- tcher hydric soil ina1cat'ors: 11" Hor.Lzcn oupth: · /~ // pH;<.7°'\ s tne ~oi.l mott!ed? \..!._; N i..ltrix Color: / o v' ,IC. 3/; i tl\L!l." hydric soil _indicators: s the hydric soil. criterion n1et? Y. N i;,,,:;. .-... jj,.._,." "-I .. "'-/ '-1-.s Sub~roup:Dys/ ... -,:. xc. ... ~ch .. ,ct Unducarmined? · V u 1 s tic a1>i peuon presen-i:? v N 'l'uxt:uce: -,,Co a 4-t , C!,;,yed? y'/ (!9 MOt,:;.le Colors: 5 '( J(. Y ~ ' . Texture: A oez-;,' c:./-z Y C.Leyeu? · Y Mot clo Colors: · · sytert-/f na t.ionalo: HYDROLOGY a ths ground·surtaca fnundated?~ (Ii) · Surface wate~ depth: ~ ~ha aoil saturated?'. N 1,ap~h ta frea istand.lng watar in p t/soil probe hola: ~ inches, ,i$~ o~ner field evidanca at aur!uca ~nundutian or sail suturu~ian1 s the wetland hydrology criterion met? {1) N natianale: , JURJ:SDJ:C'l'IONAL DF.TERMINJ\.'l'ION AND RJ\'l'IONALF. s the plant c?mmunity a wetlan~? (J) H · .. :at:l.ona.le: ' • . . _.-;;. . ~:~~,.-~"e;~;..,:-c...:.·:.. .. ~.,_---,: ... ..:• .--. - FIELD DJ\TA FORM ROUTINE: ON-SI 'l'li: nr;:·rERMll-lA'i'ION METHOD eld Investigatoi:;( s J: Vafl Wormer -/?.u t5".._.( . Date: ·oject/Sito:C e d.<1.,-"""'""/ Seate:; Coun-i:y: plicunt/Owner: J, .. .,,;;,,Ip..) J:,Ju.,f1•ranS1l1.:t I/ \llo'l: 1J cailed S11:e Description ( Optionl\l): . S/:. (~ /-,27/?..r 7 normal ori:vironinental conditions exist at tllia plant co111111un.il:y? f explain) N vo119etation, soils, and/or hydrology bean significantly dis'l:urbed? ( ll yes, explain) · · VECE'l'ATlON Pla11t Species i Status Stratum fl. i,. ·~ .. \ s , .... , .. :/.'J . f' .4 C. Plant 6 • Species Status Stratum .t,<1....,".., c. .. tu.> 'f'._0,.,,,s fA c: "'-' ,4./;<J ... .s v-... b,.... f'AC?. ? •• u. •f. 10; ~ce(\.~ of dominant species that are OBL, FAC~and/or the hydropllytic vo11oecu1:1on crit1a-t·ton 11101:?(lyj N · c.i.onalu: FAC. :ie~/Pllase :/IUe,-i.vo•./-J<,• f S ~, S@OILS 1:1,e soil on the hydric list? N t:he soil a Histosol? Y " nori:i:on Duptll: C:,, fl p~ E;111l~'-i)..._ ,-o c. 4 .. c'f './-1 Subgroup:Dysf,.,c. )(c. .. -c.&: .. ,s Undutoriuined? · y tlls tic e11ipet1on present? yl N 1l'ux ture: · tl\e soil mottiud? I!.__; N trix Color: (' 6 y· ,<. 2./, Gleyed? Y rCEJ • MO t'l:le Colors: /t> r J< h// 1er llydric soil indicatd'rs: Texture: GlayaiJ? S" vi'{ t/('f Y ® Motel~ Colors: f • • ·• Hori :i:on · Dupth: · / O f' pH;<,:"\ th~ ~oil mottled7 I..!__./ N ~rix Color: . / o l/ /1-3 l,2.. Rationale: 1e1· hydrlc soil indicator£: ~ the hydric soii criterion met? I.!:) .H ·~ HYDROLOGY the around surface !n~ndatad? _:i.., ~ • Surtaca watar depths the soil saturated?' (:J..) N ~th to tree 11tanding watar in pit/=ioil probe hole: ,.2. inches. ,t othar field evid~nce oL ~urfuca inundation or soil lllltucut:ion: the wetland hydrology criterion met?~ N Rationale: JURISDIC'tIONAL DF.TERMINA'fIOtl MD the plant co111111unity a wetlan~? & H 1:iona.la: • · _::;,-- RATlONALF. :~ - .• • ., .. . .. FIELD D11.TA FORM ROUTINE ON-SI'l'E Df.:'l'li:RMINA'l'ION METHOD i>ield Investigatot;(s): VaJl Wormer -/?e,.s,s.c..(/ -·. Oate: · /-..Z.?/7..r l' raj ect:/Si t:a: C c t:(.q, i,-w o ~ <f s ca1:e ,., County: Applicunt/Owner: L~,,,;,.;p,.J J:,.vvoif'l'ransuut II I Plot fl (<::> 1lo.i coiled Si 1:lil Description (Optional): . 5_t o t' ~ Jo normal onvironinental conditions exist: at the plant: community? y N I J f no, explain) tau~ vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significant:ly disturbed? f (!!Y ( u: yes, explain) · · VECE'l'J\'l' ION Plal),t Species _1 /i Status Stratun, Plant •• /( ... '-11...i Sf.._c...,..._1,: .'J • fAc. 6. , TJ...c...~G. ,1.•c.r. Q rAc: 7 i: iQ. C:. C 1'-;>u4 G ,-c. ( /,, Y (/U.Uf. f"/1-C.1/... U: • 1. ja./ Alu. 5 r u.. L ,. <>. FIi-C::.. 9'. ,. 10: Species •erce~~ of dominant species that are OBL, FAC~d/or s t:he hydrophytic veoetution crit1H"i'on met? (!..-1 N ::.1:lonali.,: Stat:us Stratum FAC. · 1 I ./ )<•-/ SOILS eries/Phase :,4M-u-WOP -, s-1 s t:he soil on the hydric list? @ s t:he soil a Histosul? Y ~ A" t1ori:r.on Dcpt:h: I., ~ pH: ~ Ji',,, .; ,-c.. iJ u.. .... ,:. 1.. .. "'(f .I Suboroup: Dy str,-c. )( c..,. .. cJ:. ,.is Unduccrioined? · V ti is tic ci>i peuon present? Y l'f 'J't!J&. t:uce: .s1 tl\e soil mottled? V ~ atrix Color: /0 Y t< Y/3 · cher hydric soil ind!cators: 11" Hor.i:r.on Dupth: · /o' s tne ~o.il mottled7 t/,/ pl-I: y Cleyed? v 1:~ • Mot'tle Colors: ~ Texture: Cleyet.l? Moc cl.:. Colors: .1trix Color: . / 0 Y /!, t I l., thi!L" hydric soil .indicators: s the hy,h·ic soi.l cri.terion n1et? v. © nat:l,onale: . HYDROLOGY a the ground surface inundated? Y ~ • Surface water depthl 11 the soil saturated?'. Y N epth to !ree stand.Lng water in pit/:!lo l probe hole: inches. t,n: 01:nar tie.Ld evidence of surt11ca inundat:ion or soil s11turation1 a the wetland hydrology criterion met? . · Y ([:) nationals:· JURISDIC'rIONAL DF.TERMINl\TION AND IU\.'l'IONALF. a the plant c~mmunity a wetla~? Y ~ atiana111: . . . -~-~~;-~ -;i;:#ii-"-:T~r~&: .. ~..-:-~~~.~°:~~~-·c,~-~~---