Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport 1~ ~ ~ BLDG ""' C ' ;J D6 D4 t -~ ---, :.-:±_ -~ -:.:..J.::_ NOTE THISPft(IJW"'8PllEPARmUll..!ZINC11£ M'.1,'029ll.lCONIIEIIITJt:EU.W.llll!ISlll Nl.'l!lMADaJ.!!M°RlAl.ln£V«ll0NS. LEGEND IBLDG 5-1251 EXISllNGDUl.DING R£Pl>CEOMEWF1REH'IORAtlT. EXIS'!UfJFlREH\'ll<IINT ~· FENCERBTOOAll~ "' NE'IIPEDES~.o.HDATE -----ORCUl/ffl'I-OGI WATER -,Oll'---100'SH0Rll.N£SETB,',CK ----200'9tll'!EUN[!'£Tl!ACIC -••-••-EIOEIHGPROPERTYUNE rr::r=II] CONCRETE Po\NEI. RESTOR.\llON ~.o.5PH.o.LTPA\OENTRESTORATION Vi00'>1{filli f'RCf'a'HI = FU/CE ~EXlSllNGBLASTFENct: -\ c.-=..-==--J D10 ~8 I, I' I_ C7 ~ u 'i -~i r, 5-101 i; I it (1l'X3o'l1•1 I' ., ~ ~ ~ --1···-, ji' ' D6 .11 i ! ___ / CEDAR RM:R COM~ERCIAL WATERWAY D4 t I~ ~ :::i ~~ ~ -..,:. 1',0.[}& I~ ~-- -~-~ .;,~ ~;E_M~ER 29, 2015 ® «i :zoo 20 40 eo ~1:40 NOTE lltSPRO.ECfWASPMl'"1lE!l!/IUZN::11£ NIMl29TOCll!f>'El1ITIIE[lCVATlNiiT0 ~811.IOOJ.566'TOAI.LEI.MlDIS LEGEND [BLDG 5-1251 EllSTINGOOll.lllHG REPl.ACEDNEWFlREH'tDRANT EllSTINGFREH'l'MmT --•--==~ =E=:=t=-8.£C!ACN._DUCTIWIK -----a!DINAAY liGH W~lER -••---1oo'~ESCTOACK -----200' SHOREUNESEIBACK -'"•-• .. -BOElNOPRc.>ERTYUNE ~f'OO"OSEO!l.ASTrcta: ~EXISTINGBLJ.STfENCE i .. 1,wu:o)sr.,.:,:;11·-c··m·--0· FCUNDATION PLAN G) 0 ~ w -meoc=•••== ...,...,, = r-. '"""" ""'"" DET,\IL AT CONSTRUCT 0\ JOINT {D .c=<>••·•#•• 'C1J ,. (i;!,"':,;.':~',%~~·•10E•CH ,I ~-U...,,S"'11EJO;,o;'O'S[ -[ I ~i:tt~od~~~,t~oo_/ ;:::r=i, -Soc c,-, L A-CONTRACTION JOINT .fTl fl"·'n :T,~; LOAC DIAGRA,I {T) rtl--.llllEIND' .,f fffT.E_MBER 29, 2015 ® ~1 NOREl"OOCNG'ITTELSH'LLBE '"""-""" He ,ue ,·m " . ,,. °"\ =::::J'l ,---- ,I ., I CJ SECTION/ELEVATION ra'\ sc;,u·1/1'=1'-a' LAND USE PERMIT ~DWL. ::: :: ~T FENCE FOUNDATION PLAN. DETAILS & ELEVATION fil2..1..!. nu BW~G 737 ~AX r JGfCfJ.:~E U-IJllES -N'RON D GI o;;()J[Gl SITE 04-YD S280 REf!TON.WA 1""'.._ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN11 I AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Renton PLANNING DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: APPLICANT: PROJECT LOCATION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SEC-TWN-R: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (King County Assessor) November 13, 2015 LUAlS-000749, SME, V-A Renton Apron D Utilities D Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Mark Clement PO BOX 3707 MS lW-09 Seattle, WA 98124 737 LOGAN AVE N The Boeing Company and the City of Renton have entered into a development agreement, dated June 28, 2002 that vests development at the Boeing 737 Manufacturing Facility (737 Logan Ave. N), the subject site, to the development standards established in 2002. The applicant has requested two variances from the vested 2002 development standards as follows: 1) A setback variance from RMC 4-2-130A, in order to reduce the required 20-foot wide setback down to 5 feet; and, 2) A landscape buffer variance in order to eliminate the required 5-foot wide landscape buffer and solid 6 foot fence, along a property line when adjacent to a public use. The subject site is vested to Industrial Heavy zoning and is 151.94 acres is area. Overall the goal of the project is to provide for production rate increases to the 737 program. In addition to the variance request the applicant is requesting a shoreline exemption for the replacement of existing utilities in Apron D, which is within the 100 ft. buffer of the Cedar River, Reach A, designated Shoreline High Intensity. The following maintenance activities would occur within the shoreline designation: 28,100 SF of concrete and asphalt replacement, 4480 linear feet of utility replacement (water, air line, and electrical duct bank), and 5 fire hydrants. Finally, an existing blast fence is being replaced and relocated west, by approximately 8 feet and would be placed 120 feet from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of the Cedar River. The project would not increase impervious square footage or add new building square footage within the shoreline area. With the application a geotechnical analysis and storm water report was submitted. NE07-23-5 POR OF E 1/2 OF SEC 7-23-05 LY ELY OF CWW # 2 & NLY OF N 6TH ST IN SE 1/4 OF SEC LESS NP R/W LESS ST TGW VAC LOGAN ST LY NWLY OF LN 30 FT Page 1 of 3 City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Renton Apron D Utilities D Certificate of Exemption from Shoreline Substantial Development LUAlS-000749, SME, V-A WATER BODY: NWLY OF GOV MOR LN TGW 2ND CL SH LOS ADJ SUBJ TO TWO 20 FT R/W ESMTS & POR OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC BEG NXN S MGN OF N 6TH ST WITH W MGN LOGAN AVE TH SLY ALG SD ST 995.34 FT TH S 89-18-45 W TO ELY MGN CWW #2 TH N ALG SD MGN TO S MGN N 6TH ST THE TO BEG LESS BEG NW COR THOF TH SELY ALG WLY LN 328. 75 FT TH N 89-45-45 E 366.34 FT TH N 00-14-15 W TO S MGN N 6TH ST TH W TO BEG LESS 137. 70 FT THOF TGW PORS OF NW 1/4 SEC 08-23-05 & SE 1/4 SEC 06-23-05 & SW 1/4 SEC 05-23-05 LY NWLY OF NP R /W & SWLY OF LN BEG NXN WLY EXT OF N LN OF GL 1 WITH W MGN SD R/W TH W 763.39 FT TH N 43-06-56 W 680.06 FT M/L TO INNER HARBOR LN TH S 46-52-27 W ALG SD LN 607.89 FT TO TPOB TH S 43-06-56 E 713.87 FT TH S 46-53-04 W 215 FT TH S 20-38-24 W TO NWLY MGN SD NP R/W SUBJ TO SD 20 FT ESMTS LESS BN OPER STRIP ADJ POR OF SELY LN IN SD SEC 08-23-05 LESS ST RD #7 TGW VAC LOGAN ST LY NLY OF SPUR TRACKS TGW BLK C LK WASH SH LDS 3RD SUPPL LESS POR FOR RD PER DEED 20060817000676 LESS POR PER DEED 20061212000338 Cedar River An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby Approved on the proposed project in accordance with RMC 4.9.190C 'Exemptions from Permit System' and for the following reasons: Subsection 3: Maintenance and Repair: Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements: a. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition. b. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to the shoreline resource or environment. c. Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or development including, but not limited to, its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or environment The proposed development is: Consistent with the policies of the Shoreline Management Act. Not Applicable to the guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adopted by the Department. Consistent with the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. Page 2 of 3 City of Renton Department of Community & £<,anomic Development Renton Apron D Utilities D Certificate of Exemp __ , from Shoreline Substantial Development LUAlS-000749, SME, V-A WATER BODY: NWLY OF GOV MDR LN TGW 2ND CL SH LDS ADJ SUBJ TO TWO 20 FT R/W ESMTS & POR OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC BEG NXN 5 MGN OF N 6TH ST WITH W MGN LOGAN AVE TH SLY ALG SD ST 995.34 FT TH S 89-18-45 W TO ELY MGN CWW #2 TH N ALG SD MGN TO S MGN N 6TH ST THE TO BEG LESS BEG NW COR THOF TH SELY ALG WLY LN 328. 75 FT TH N 89-45-45 E 366.34 FT TH N 00-14-15 W TO 5 MGN N 6TH ST TH W TO BEG LESS 137.70 FT THOF TGW PORS OF NW 1/4 SEC 08-23-05 & SE 1/4 SEC 06-23-05 & SW 1/4 SEC 05-23-05 LY NWLY OF NP R/W & SWLY OF LN BEG NXN WLY EXT OF N LN OF GL 1 WITH W MGN SD R/W TH W 763.39 FT TH N 43-06-56 W 680.06 FT M/L TO INNER HARBOR LN TH 5 46-52-27 W ALG SD LN 607.89 FT TO TPOB TH 5 43-06-56 E 713.87 FT TH 5 46-53-04 W 215 FT TH 5 20-38-24 W TO NWLY MGN SD NP R/W SUBJ TO SD 20 FT ESMTS LESS BN OPER STRIP ADJ POR OF SELY LN IN SD SEC 08-23-05 LESS ST RD #7 TGW VAC LOGAN ST LY NLY OF SPUR TRACKS TGW BLK C LK WASH SH LDS 3RD SUPPL LESS POR FOR RD PER DEED 20060817000676 LESS POR PER DEED 20061212000338 Cedar River An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby Approved on the proposed project in accordance with RMC 4.9.190C 'Exemptions from Permit System' and for the following reasons: Subsection 3: Maintenance and Repair: Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements: a. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition. b. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to the shoreline resource or environment. c. Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or development including, but not limited to, its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or environment The proposed development is: Consistent with the policies of the Shoreline Management Act. Not Applicable to the guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adopted by the Department. Consistent with the City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. Page 2 of 3 City of Renton Department of Community & Ecvnomic Development Renton Apron D Utilities D SIGNATURE & DATE OF DECISION : Certificate of Exemp .. ..,, .. from Shoreline Substantial Development LUAlS-000749, SME, V-A Date The administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 on or before 5:00 pm, on November 30, 2015. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, (425) 430-6510. Attachments: Vicinity/Neighborhood Detail Map, Site Plan Page 3 of 3 ~-_:~--=='-i -------~-~____/ -- CEDAR RrvER COMf.lERCIAL WATERWAY __L:n~ . ---=!==----~-=---' u' .e1,,,_._, ___ ,,_ L ---_.,._ l!Q!;-1'.1'1![!.alJ'IJ'}=4,. • 558-..::.--,..r• . -";.._~ ;· Llllllll' ~SIIV'I LJTro : · =-I~ ,=m 5-llr 5-122 (12'X.JC)1 ~-.. _ ., , '""°l '""" ·. D3 =:mt-:· 200'551----r-----,.,,,s ~~-~m-200'•---_ · __ -· [XISf. !UST \__. ~~-~ !~ 1 D10 ~SIIJRUI£ Ulllf(lf .·•·.· OJl,ICPMn •.• BUlG Iiii u MQ/ 5-102 (12"0)') '.1~ '(8"X201 D8 " ~· I -~ --__ · 5-101 (12'X301 I , I I I "_OOSf:aMTFENCE(9~" 07 ~ ~ ~ \"""' D6 . ' v5-103. 5-1 D3 '""" 1 .,.:: D5 o:isLfLIIS'Tf1NCE(t"Xi3J' D4 11c:::::::::J t::J c:=::::::J c:::::::J .. ({i!'IIEING' © =;.;a. f---t'"'-'" ~;E_M!ER n_2~ NOTE THISl'RO.ECTWASl'llll'IIR!lllmll111Gllff ~ ~ ~ ~':ff,b"~L~~~n LEGElli) !BLDG_5-:125 &. _,,,.. ___ 100· SHORfUNf stT!!ACI< -----2009'00fllNr<;fffiACK -••-·•-B[JflNGPRO!'ERIYLINE CT:IIIJ CDNC!!£TE PANEL RfSTO!lAllO< c:::::==:::::=J •Sl''IV•lT l'AV(loll'NT Rf~TOOA' P222:2=zn Pl!()l'1l'i!11 Al A~T fnjCf L~----= TXISlltlG BLASI FENCE C80 JI ~!rlAN® LAND USE PERMIT SITEPLAN BOEINGlllw.:l."JG•ll'NfUTILffi~-·p;''jij~To,1,[Cl S1TE4-YD 51 l , J 51 Rev11ed04·21-1S ) Washington Renton North 8th and Logan Avenue North, Renton, WA 98055 · .. 53 54 LAKE WASHINGTON l From 1 52 n.J7 cH--U-~~ Triton Towers Three 7-lD6 !+~~--Triton Towers Two :-----= 53 54 • Employee gates 'J AMS Turnstile gates Fence lines Walking trails D Boeing property D General parking D Restricted parking ,iij) Bus stop e Helistop rn Cafeteria in the building 55 Copyr1ght)OlS ~ TheBoemgCornpany All nghtsres,;,rved l l 1 El 1 I I DEPARTMENT OF COMI\.JNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ffenton0 A. ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE REPORT & DECISION REPORT DA TE: Project Name: Owner: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Site Area: November 13, 2015 Renton Apron D Utilities D Mark Clement, Boeing, PO Box 3707 MC lW-09, Seattle, WA 98124 LUAlS-000749 Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager The Boeing Company and the City of Renton have entered into a development agreement, dated June 28, 2002 that vests development at the Boeing 737 Manufacturing Facility (737 Logan Ave. N), the subject site, to the development standards established in 2002. The applicant has requested two variances from the vested 2002 development standards as follows: 1) A setback variance from RMC 4-2- 130A, to allow a 5 foot setback instead of the required 20 feet and, 2) A landscape buffer variance to not provided landscaping along a property line where the adjacent use is public, instead of the required 5 foot wide landscape strip and solid 6 foot fence. The subject site is vested to Industrial Heavy zoning and is 151.94 acres is area. Overall the goal of the project is to provide for production rate increases to the 737 program. In addition to the variance request the applicant is requesting a shoreline exemption for the replacement of existing utilities in Apron D, which is within the 100 ft. buffer of the Cedar River. With the application, a geotechnical analysis and stormwater report was submitted. 737 Logan Ave. N 151.94 acres Project Location Map Apron D Variance 15-000749 City of Renton Deportment of Com .. Jnity & Economic Development RENTON APRON D UTILITIES D A ....... ,nistrative Variance Report & Decision LUA15-000749 November 13, 2015 Page 2 of 7 II 8. EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1: Staff Report Exhibit 2: Vicinity Map Exhibit 3: Site Plan Exhibit 4: Utility Plan Exhibit 5: Blast Fence Foundation Plan, Details, and Elevation Exhibit 6: Variance Justification -Setback Exhibit 7: Variance Justification -Landscaping Exhibit 8: Renton School District Comment Letter II C. GENERALINFORMATION: 1. Owner(s) of Record: 2. Zoning Classification: Boeing, PO Box 3707 MC lW-09, Seattle, WA 98124 2002 vested Heavy Industrial (IH) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Employment Area Industrial 4. Existing Site Use: Boeing Manufacturing Plan (Apron D) 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: a. North: Boeing Manufacturing Plan (zaned UC -vested ta IH) b. East: Boeing Manufacturing Plan (zaned UC -vested ta IH) c. South: Renton Memorial Stadium (zaned UC) d. West: Cedar River Trail Park and the Cedar River (Na zoning) 6. Site Area: 151.95 acres i D. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Development Agreement Land Use File No. Recording Number: 20020802000224 Ordinance No. N/A Date 06/28/2002 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE -VESTED TO 2002 PER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, RECORDING NUMBER 20020802000224: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts a. Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts b. Section 4-2-060: Zoning Use Table c. Section 4-2-130: Industrial Development Standards 2. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria a. Section 4-9-250: Variances, Waivers, Modifications, and Alternates 3. Chapter 11 Definitions Apron D Variance 15-000749 City of Renton Department of Co1 RENTON APRON D UTILITIES D 1ity & Economic Development A iistrative Variance Report & Decision LUA15-000749 November 13, 2015 Page 3 of 7 II F, FINDINGS OF FACT (FOF}: L The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on October 13, 2015 and determined the application complete on October 14, 2015. The project complies with the 120-day review period. 2. The project is located at 737 Logan Ave. N, at the Boeing Renton Manufacturing Plan. More specifically Apron D within the Manufacturing Plan Campus. 3. The project site is currently developed with 10 737 Aircraft spaces, including utility infrastructure and blast fences. 4. The property is located within the Commercial Mixed Use Comprehensive Plan land use designation; however the project is vested to Employment Area Industrial. 5. The site is located within the Urban Center (UC) zoning classification; however the project is vested to Heavy Industrial zoning. 6. There is currently no vegetation on the project site, Apron D is developed with 100% impervious surface. 7. The site is located east of the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State, located in Cedar River Reach A, designated Shoreline High Intensity. The applicant has requested a Shoreline Exemption for maintenance and repair of the replaced utilities and the relocation of the blast fence. 8. The proposed blast fence would be relocated 17 feet south, to be placed 5 feet from the south property line. The blast fence is 70 feet long by 10 feet in height, with a 1,130 SF foundation. 9. The applicant is proposing to begin construction in December of 2015 and end in November of 2016. 10. Staff received one comment letter (Exhibit 8), from the Renton School District. The comment letter stated that the School District had no objections to the proposed variance. 11. Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essences of the comments have been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report, and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. 12. Consistency With Variance Criteria: Section 4-9-2508.5 "Decision Criteria" lists 4 criteria that the Planning Director is asked to consider, along with oil other relevant information, in making a decision on an Administrative Variance application. The applicant has requested a side yard setback variance from RMC 4-2-130A to allow a 5 foot setback for a blast fence instead of the required 20 foot setback. Staff recommends approval of the setback variance. Compliance The Planning Director shall have authority to grant an administrative variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of ,/' rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; The applicant contends that the strict application of the Zoning Code would deprive the property owner substantial use of the southwest earner of the manufacturing facility. This is primarily due to the orientation of the adjacent Cedar River and the location and Apron D Variance 15-000749 City of Renton Department of co, RENTON APRON D UTILITIES D 1ity & Economic Development · 1istrative Variance Report & Decision LUAlS-000749 November 13, 2015 Page 4 of 7 orientation of the existing access bridge connecting Apron D to the Renton Municipal Airport. The southeasterly corner of Apron D does not provide the space needed in its current configuration to perform the necessary manufacturing activities to accommodate a 737-900 aircraft. If the southeasterly corner cannot be used the property owner would be required to fully relocate the Apron D activities to another piece of property resulting in substantial changes to the existing manufacturing plant. Staff Concurs with the applicant, the strict application of the 20 foot setback would deprive the property owner of substantial use of the southwest corner of the manufacturing facility. Complete redesign of the manufacturing plant to accommodate one aircraft position would result in an undue hardship for the applicant. These special circumstances, that are applicable to the subject property, created by the existing configuration of bridge, along with minimal necessary spacing for aircraft movements result in the need for a setback reduction to S feet. The strict application of the 20 foot setback would deprive the property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other manufacturing property owners in the vicinity and under the IH zoning classification. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; The applicant contends that the granting of the variance would not change the use or activities at the site and there/are the setback reduction would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the adjacent property. Additionally, the blast fence and 737 aircraft stall is an existing condition, as such there would be no operational changes, simply o relocation of the blast fence setback to accommodate a 737-900 aircraft. Currently, the Boeing Company coordinates engine run up operation such that the operations do not take place during the use of the field. This protocol would not change as a result of the variance. Staff concurs with the applicant that the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property in the vicinity. The southeasterly corner of Apron D abuts the Renton Memorial Stadium. This stadium is used by the Renton School District for athletic events such as football, track and field, and special events. The primary use of the stadium is located within the stadium itself approximately 180 feet from the property line and buffered from Apron D by stadium seating. The Renton School District has indicated in a response that they have no objections to the proposed setback reduction (Exhibit 7). The primary event that takes place outside the stadium along the subject property line is the Javelin competition. However, based on Boeings coordination with school events and engine run ups coupled with the School Districts response, staff believes that the setback variance would not result in detrimental impacts to the public welfare. c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; and The applicant contends that the location of the blast fence at 5 feet would not constitute a grant of special privilege because the fence is a screening and protection fencing for the adjacent property owners from the engine run manufacturing activates that are ongoing at the plat site. Staff Concurs with the applicant that the reduction of the setback to 5 feet would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitation placed upon other properties in the vicinity and zone. All industrial facilities are required to meet different Apron D Variance 15-000749 City of Renton Deportment of Co, RENTON APRON D UTILITIES D 1ity & Economic Development A 1istrative Variance Report & Decision LUAlS-000749 November 13, 2015 Page 5 of7 and unique safety standards based upon their operations. It is necessary for the Boeing manufacturing facility to provide for public safety by the installation of the blast fence behind an aircraft testing stall. d. That the approval is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. The applicant can tends that the location of the existing bridge crossing the Cedar River ,/ reduces the use of the southeasterly earner of the property resulting in the loss of this earner for 737-900 aircraft parking. Staff Concurs with the applicant that the reduction of the side yard setback to 5 feet is the minimum necessary to accommodate the 737-900 aircraft position and necessary movements to access the south Boeing bridge crassing to the Renton Municipal Airport. See additional analysis above under criterion a. 13. Consistency With Variance Criteria: Section 4-9-2508.5 "Decision Criteria" lists 4 criteria that the Planning Director is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on an Administrative Variance application. The applicant has requested a landscape buffer variance from RMC 4-2-130A to not install landscaping along the south property line. Staff recommends approval of the landscape buffer variance. Compliance The Planning Director shall have authority to grant an administrative variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: e. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; The applicant contends that they suffer undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA} regulations and existing operations at the site. The current condition along the south property line is paved and without screening vegetation. Because the operations in this area of Apron Dare within an Air ,/ Operation Area (AOA) Boeing follows the FAA criteria for minimizing Foreign Object Debris (FOO). Specifically in the apron areas for Boeing properties that conduct aircraft operations, the Advisory Circular AC 150/5210-24 Airport Foreign Object Debris (FOO} Management is followed. This document provides direction on prevention, detection, removal, and evaluation. The application of FOO in areas were aircraft operations are conducted is constant with other adjacent aircraft facilities and is in compliance with federal guidelines adhered to nationwide for similar facilities. Staff concurs that the applicant suffers undue hardship as the strict application af the zoning code would be in conflict with the federal FOO regulations. Furthermore, AC 150/5210-24 states "the presence of FOO on an airport's air operations area (AOA} poses a significant threat to the safety of air travel. FOO has the potential to damage aircraft during critical phases of lift off, which can lead to cotastraphic loss of life and airframe, and at the very least increase maintenance and operations costs. ,/ f. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in Apron D Variance 15-000749 City of Renton Department of Car RENTON APRON D UTILITIES D , & Economic Development Ad ative Short Plat Report & Decision WAlS-000749 November 13, 2015 Page 6 of 7 which subject property is situated; The applicant contends that maintaining the existing condition of pavement would not be detrimental to the public. Staff concurs with the applicant and based on the FOD analysis above in criterion a. staff further concluded that not granting the variance would be detrimental to the public welfare. g_ That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; and ., The applicant contends the variance request is simply to a/law the praperty owner to maintain compliance with the FAA regulations for this type of facility. Granting of the variance would be consistent with the current property use and adjacent airport and aircraft facilities landscaping requirements and conditions. Staff concurs with the application that the granting of this variance would not constitute a grant of special privilege. h . That the approval is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired ., purpose. The variance is the minimum to accomplish camplionce with FAA regulations of FOD. I 1. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The subject site is located in the Employment Area Industrial (vested) Comprehensive Plan designation. 2. The subject site is located in the Heavy Industrial (IH) vested zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation provided the applicant complies with City Code and conditions of approval, see FOF 14. 3. The requested setback variance complies with the all four criteria for approval as demonstrated in FOF 12. 4. The requested landscape buffer variance complies with all four criteria for approval as demonstrated in FOF 13. I J. DECISION: The side yard setback variance from 20 feet to 5 feet and the landscape buffer variance to eliminate the landscaping standards for the Renton Apron Utilities D project, File No. LUAlS-000749, is approved. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: J~r Date TRANSMITTED this 13th day of November, 2015 to the Owner/Applicant/Contact: Apron D Variance 15-000749.dacx City of Renton Department of Ca, · nity & Economic Development RENTON APRON D UTILITIES D November 13, 2015 Mark Clement, Boeing, PO Box 3707 MC lW-09, Seattle, WA 98124 TRANSMITTED this 13th day of November, 2015 to the Parties of Record: Jerry Lee 514 Burnett Ave. N Renton, WA 98057 Sam Rosendahl P. 0. Box 4158 Federal Way, WA 98063 TRANSMITTED this 13th day of November, 2015 to the following: Jennifer Henning, Planning Director Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Manager Jan Conklin, Development Services Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Fire Marshal A inistrative Variance Report & Decision LUAlS-000749 Page 7 of 7 K. LAND USE ACTION APPEALS, REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION, & EXPIRATION: The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the decision date. APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on November 30, 2015. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680), together with the required fee to the Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. RMC 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. EXPIRATION: The administrative short plat decision will expire two (2) years from the date of decision. A single one (1) year extension may be requested pursuant to RMC 4-7-070.M. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension ofthe appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: provides that no ex pa rte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning the land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial decision, but to Appeals to the Hearing Examiner as well. All communications after the decision/approval date must be made in writing through the Hearing Examiner. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the appeal by the Court. Apron D Variance 15-000749 " Longacres Park Rev11ed04-21-15 51 51 _) Washington Renton North 8th and Logan Avenue North, Renton, WA 98055 ., 52 , , .·53' 54 LAKE WASHINGTON 52 EXHIBIT 2 54 From Bellevue • Employee gates -,. AMS Turnstile gates Fence Hnes Walking trails D Boeing property D General parking D Restricted parking r@ Bus stop ® Helislop m Cafeteria in the bwlding 55 Ccpyrrght 201 S ~ TheBoemg Cornp~ny All ngbts reserved ~-~---:=_-~- ___L=n~ -----~--- ~~~____./ -~ ~~------- CEDAR RIVER COMMERCW.. WATERWAY --l!Ofl~QPI~~~ "'-·~-"-= ~~ LJilll. 5-125 ,-~ -· ·- (12'U:J1 0.3 5-111 5-122 L _ 't.ffl (12'XlDl ; (1TUO") ti!i!I?\ 2 Ss1-...._m_~---,,.,__203'-~,._-200'$Sll-200'~ :~ 010 ~-~~ BLDG 1,~l _filQQ_/ 5-102 {n'X3o'} -~ -· =""\ \TOOL .. CABAN,\ .,,,, -\_=-~LOG um 5-26 (~l'xzOO'} ""-l 7'1""'_!l.Cl<Ta<(Ufl.n(S-,......0~·- DB 1 -- ~I 5-101; . (12'Xl01 OOST.EllASffOU~ D7 ~ ~ ~ \'··-' 1=::::JCJ . ={::::= 05 r --05 BLDG /s=foJ , (!n.JOJ D4 EXHIBIT 3 SITEPLAN ~;;E.M~ER 29 2015 ® 4/J 20 0 20 4/J SO ~----..l NO[E llflSP1iOW.:.ISPREJ'AAEOLm.JZ111Glllc NGVIJ291DC0~1H[[i£'/~lllMSTO NIMl Ill ADD l551i' TO lil lllVAllll1S L,GrND lfil.PG5-1~ EXJSTI,;o:;BUttDING -,--,-f[~ RESTIJRA I>. -----ORDltl.t.RYHIGH IJl.1,T[R -,•---100 Slio)R(UNE St:fflAO( -----Wlf Sl<ORELJl<E SETBACI< -••-··-B0E:1HCPROPffiTYUNE ITIITI CONCRl:T[ PAim 11rs1DRATIOH c====:J A~IALT P.1,V!.O,RNT ~[SIOR,.TIO k%l.Jl121J PROPOSED BtASl F(NC£ ~IEl(ISTINGBLASTf[MCf ~[-JELAN® ,~O~I..~ w°;7i'ml :J ~IG E!OEl~G 7l7 MOJC 'LIGHTUNE ,nLr,,s -,\Pl/0, 0 Cl 'RCl.l[CT I f"'Q ,,,,Q ,,,e.eo SITE 4-YD t,,.-,;:u ~ENTDN0 WAI"_"°_ O<-w ,._-,v '°'"-"'" -.....,...-_. I ··-x 11 ~-?~~AU PLAVD 0 ~ ,. ID-----~ -o[ . =""'~ SCTESIOJlllOOlln.Slll"a!:IIS!:0 DETAIL AT CONSTRUCTION JOINT (i) ··=·=~-~,-~ ,. :..~i:s-)1°--li"Lttlrn'IOlE!(ITll- .---- Qi j __ =·if,;~~,.::/ ~-S[E DETAI'_ AT COWRACTION JOINT ill """i"'""fllll<l'U<!U1Ul1E5-CC"_~- ~ 1-;· T ,~. ,~fl _OA~ DIAGRAM {b EXHIBIT 5 ~~ ~rirR ~1E~~ER 29, _201_:J-0 SECTION/[_EVAT ON 0 sc.oJ.(·1/2"-•"-0" 1101a·oc _I' t.1-c ScCTION/ELEVATION ill SClLE'/2"•1"-0" LAND USE PERMIT ·:::: BlASr FENCE FOUNDATION PLAN, DETAILS & ELEVATION cu~,, EIOEING JJ7 r.w: FLIGHTUNE UIIL'TIES -APRO~ D Ci Pi:.>JECl SITE 04-YD ·,1 ~OWi. .,;';7,,,IM~ORI ~_B_D RfNT~N ~,---0<-YD-~0 ~D-S2S0 October 6, 2015 w.o. 13726 Ms. Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA, 98051-3232 Subject: Boeing 73 7 Flightline Utilities Apron D -Setback Variance Dear Ms. Dolbee: On behalf of the Boeing Company, this letter includes our request for a code variance from the City of Renton required property line setback for the relocation of the existing an existing blast fence on Apron D. Variance Request: Apron parking positions for the 737 MAX aircraft manufactured at this site require significant area and are required to be accessed by a variety of operational traffic including equipment trucks, truck lifts and fire apparatus vehicles for emergency response. The parking positions require specific clearance criteria from adjacent aircraft and the planes must be towed into place along specific alignments. In order to utilize the southeasterly comer of Apron D, the position D-10 blast fence must be moved back 17' leaving 5' clear to the property line. In the pre-application conference Boeing was directed to submit a variance for the resulting l O foot encroachment into the 15 foot side yard setback. Variance Request Justification: Provided below is the justification requirements provided by the City of Renton required to be granted a variance along with our justification and explanation for the variance request with detailed response to each of the requirements. The applicant suffers practical difficulties and unnecessmy hardship and the variance is necessmy because of special circumstances applicable lo subject property, including size, shape, topography, and location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application ~[the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; o Due to the orientation of the adjacent Cedar River and the location and orientation of the existing access bridge connecting the Apron D property with the Renton Airport the southeasterly corner of the Apron D parcel does not provide the space needed in its current configuration to perform the manufacturing activities in compliance with development agreement entered into by Boeing and the City of Renton. Loss of the use of this corner of the property would require the property owner to relocation proposed manufacturing activities to another piece of property requiring substantial facility improvements at the relocated location. • The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; o The granting of the variance will not change the use or activity at the site there by will not be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to the adjacent property. The adjacent property owned by the Renton School District and the property is used as an athletic field. The athletic field is behind the public stadium and track. The following are additional reasons the variance will not be detrimental: 425-869-2670 • 800-865-98471 Alaska a Arizona • Co!ora EXHIBIT6 98052 • www.dowl.com ihington II Wyoming Ms. Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton September 29, 2015 Page 2 The blast fence is an existing condition; the position D-10 currently parks a 737 and there are no operational changes being initiated, the blast fence is simply being relocated. Engine run up operations conducted by Boeing are coordinated such that the operations do not take place during the use of the field. This protocol will remain in place. The property is screened by landscape (School side), and the views will not be appreciably changed. The only change will be the blast fence will move closer to the adjacent property. The changed blast fence location will not impact the current operations of the Renton School District, the condition is (and remains) safe to the adjacent land user. The approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; and o The proposed blast fence relocation constitutes the construction of a screening and or protection fencing to protect the adjacent prope11y from the exiting permitted manufacturing activities. This is a measure that the property owner is constructing at their own expense to reduce the effects of the manufacturing activities on the adjacent prope11y. The adjacent airpmt prope11y directly connected to the Apron D through the Cedar River bridge contains several similar blast fences saturated directly adjacent to public rights of way. As a result of the cost incurred by the property owner to install the blast fence along with similar installations on surrounding prope1ties results in this not constituting a grant of special privileges. • The approval is the minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. o The location of the existing bridge crossing the Cedar River reduces the use of the southeasterly corner of the property such that the corner is not suitable for use by the owner. The owner has evaluated the options for increasing the space available within that comer of the property and dete1mined that the proposed shift in the blast fence will result in the minimum amount of space required with the minimum amount of impact to the adjacent prope1ties and Cedar River. We are formally requesting that we be allowed to encroach IO' into the 15' side yard setback as shown within the permit documents submitted along with this variance request. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, DOWL Travis W. Neu, P.E. Project Manager 425-869-2670 • 800-865-9847 (fax) • 8420 154th Avenue NE • Redmond, Washington 98052 • www.dowl.com Alaska • Arizona • Colorado • Montana • North Dakota • Oregon • Washington • Wyoming October 6, 2015 W.O. 13726 Ms. Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA, 98051-3232 Subject: Boeing 737 Flightline Utilities Apron D-Landscape Variance Dear Ms. Dolbee: On behalf of the Boeing Company, this Jetter includes our request for a code variance from the City of Renton Landscape criteria for industrial zone abutting an adjacent commercial zone, as required by Renton Municipal Code 4-4-070 "Landscaping". As noted in Section R, to deviate from the provisions of 4-4-070 a variance must be submitted and approved pursuant to RMC 4-9-250B5 (listed in italics above). Va.-iance Request Justification: Detailed below is the justification requirements provided by the City of Renton along with our explanation as to why this project should receive a variance and the measures that the project will take to mitigate any adverse effects that may be encountered by the adjacent property owners. The applicant sidfers practical difficulties and unnecessa,y hardship and the variance is necessa,y because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, and location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; o With respect to the landscape variance, the current condition along the south property line is paved to the property line witl1out screening or vegetation. Because the operations in the area of Apron Dare within an AOA (air operations area) Boeing follows the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) criteria for minimizing Foreign Object Debris (FOD). Specifically in the apron areas for Boeing properties that conduct aircraft operations, the Advisory Circular AC 150/5210-24 Airport Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Management is followed. The document provides direction on prevention, detection, removal and evaluation. This is not only constant with other adjacent aircraft facilities but is in compliance with federal guidelines adhered to nationwide for similar facilities. Foreign Object Debris (FOD) is "Any object, live or no/, located in an inappropriate location in the airport environment that has the capacity to injure airport or air carrier personnel and damage aircraft". Ftuther from AC AC 150/5210-24: "The presence of FOD on an airport's air operations area (AOA) poses a significant threat lo the safety of air travel. FOD has the potential to damage aircraft during critical phases of flight, which can lead to catastrophic loss of life and airframe, and al the ve1y least increased maintenance and operating costs. FOD hazards can be reduced, however, through the implementation of a FOD management program and the effective use ofFOD detection and removal equipment. "The swfaces of all movement areas including pavements (runways, taxiways and aprons) and adjacent areas shall be inspected and their conditions monitored regularly as part of on aerodrome preventiw~ mu! rrwrPrfivP mn;nlPnnnr:P. nrmrrnm with the objective of avoiding 425-669-267( Alaska • A EXHIBIT 7 lmond, Washinglon 98052 • www.dowl.com 1 Orngon • Washington • Wyoming Ms. Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton September 29, 2015 Page2 and eli111inating any loose objects/debris that 111ight cause da111age to aircraft or impair the operation of aircraft systems. " • The granting of the variance will not be 111ateriaffy detrimental lo the public welfare or injurious to the property or i111prove111ents in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; o The existing condition is paved to the property line, the adjacent land use is a public athletic field. There is landscape screening on the public athletic field side of the property within a 20' sanitary sewer easement granted to Boeing. Maintaining the existing condition will not deprive subject property to rights and privileges as Boeing will be maintaining the existing landscape buffer that is within the 20' sanitary sewer easement. Being that the project proposes to maintain the existing conditions and use of the property there will be no detriment to the public. The approval shaff not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the li111itation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; and o The property owner is in no way requesting special privilege nor will the owner benefit in any way beyond the ability to continue historic operations at this site. The variance is only being requested to maintain the property owner's compliance with FAA regulations for this type of facility. Granting of this variance would be consistent with the current property use and adjacent airpo1t and aircraft facilities landscaping requirements and conditions. • The approval is the minimum variance that will acco111plish the desired purpose. o Boeing prides itself as an environmental steward, ttying to minimize and avoid environmental impacts in all of its operations. In addition Boeing prides itself on being a "good neighbor" contributing to the community in positive ways; Boeing goes to significant efforts to enhance the community with aesthetics associated with its facilities with improvements that are in keeping with the Renton Municipal Code criteria and of benefit to neighbors, employees and the larger community. To that end Boeing has always been willing and open to providing landscaping and other community improvements where applicable and when possible. If not for the specific and somewhat special requirements imposed on Boeing by the FAA for this type of facility landscaping would be provided at this location. We are formally requesting that the landscaping requirement for this project be waived based on the justification provided within this variance request. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, DOWL Travis W. Neu, P.E. Project Manager 425-869-2670 • 800-865-9847 {fax) • 8420 154th Avenue NE • Redmond, Washington 98052 • www.dowl.com Alasl~a • Arizona • Colorado • Montana • North Dakota • Oregon • Washington • Wyoming Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Sam Rosendahl <sam@greenegasaway.com> Monday, October 19, 2015 11:07 AM Vanessa Dolbee 'Randy Matheson'; Rick Stracke; Calvin Gasaway Subject: FW: Setback Variance Application by Renton Memorial Stadium Attachments: Notice of Application_Boeing Apron D_lS-000749.pdf; Apron D COR Setback Variance 10-6-2015.pdf; Apron D COR Landscape Variance 10-6-15.pdf; 10-Site Plans.pd!; 12 - Architectural Elevations.pd! Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Vanessa- Hope this finds you doing well. We are helping RSD coordinate efforts at the stadium. We have reviewed this with the school district and they do not have objections to the proposed variance at this time. Thanks, Sam Rosendahl greenegasaway www.g re en e gas away .com o: 253,941.4937 fl 253.941.5122 P () Box 4 1 5 8, Fi;: de r a I Way. WA 9 8 O 6 3 Our cm:.iil addresses have been updated to: name@greene•~asaway com From: Richard (Rick) Stracke [mailto:richard.stracke@rentonschools.us] Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 8:42 AM To: Calvin Gasaway (calvin@ggarchitects.com); Sam Rosendahl (sam@qreeneqasaway.com) Subject: FW: Setback Variance Application by Renton Memorial Stadium Rick Stracke Executive Director Facilities Planning 425-204-4403 From: Randy Matheson Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:29 PM To: Arthur (Art) Jarvis <Arthur.Jarvis@rentonschools.us>; Susan Leland <Susan.leland@rentonschools.us>; Richard (Rick) Stracke <richard.stracke@rentonschools.us> Cc: Damien Pattenaude <Damien.Pattenaude@rentonschools.us>; Sheryl Moore <sheryl.moore@rentonschools.us>; Brian Kaelin <Brian.Kaelin@rentonschools.us> Subject: Setback Variance Application by Renton Memorial Stadium EXHIBIT 8 I'm not sure how we proceed with this request (legal, property considerations, etc.). What are our next steps. Randy Matheson, Executive Director, Community Relations Renton School District I 300 SW 7th Street, Renton WA 98057 I 425.204.2345 I randy.matheson@rentonschools.us I www.rentonschools.us 11) .. ~~_....~ 1r.~n!o.n From: Vanessa Dolbee [mailto:VDolbee@Rentonwa.gov J Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:08 PM To: Randy Matheson <randy.matheson@rentonschools.us> Subject: Setback Variance Application by Renton Memorial Stadium Randy, The City of Renton has received o request for a setback variance from the Boeing Company to move a blast fence to be 5 feet from the north property line of the Renton Memorial Stadium site. The code would require a 20 foot setback. I would greatly appreciate the School District's review and comment on the subject request. Please find attached, the Notice of Application, the Applicant's variance justifications, the site plan, and architectural elevations of the blast fence. Comments are due by October 28, 2015, by 5:00 pm. If you have any questions or need additional information please let me know. Thank you, 'Vanessa 'lJo[fiee, Current Planning Manager Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425)430-7314 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Randy, Vanessa Dolbee Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:08 PM 'randy.matheson@rentonschools.us' Setback Variance Application by Renton Memorial Stadium Notice of Application_Boeing Apron D_l5-000749.pdf; Apron D COR Setback Variance 10-6-2015.pdf; Apron D COR Landscape Variance 10-6-15.pdf; 10-Site Plans.pd/; 12 - Architectural Elevations.pd! The City of Renton has received a request for a setback variance from the Boeing Company to move a blast fence to be 5 feet from the north property line of the Renton Memorial Stadium site. The code would require a 20 foot setback. I would greatly appreciate the School District's review and comment on the subject request. Please find attached, the Notice of Application, the Applicant's variance justifications, the site plan, and architectural elevations of the blast fence. Comments are due by October 28, 2015, by 5:00 pm. If you have any questions or need additional information please let me know. Thank you, 'Vanessa '1Jo[6ee, Current Planning Manager Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425)430-7314 Leslie Betlach Plan Number: Site Address: LUAlS-000749 737 LOGAN AVE N Plan Review Routing Slip Name: Rnton Apron D Utilites D Description: The Boeing Company and the City of Renton have entered into a development agreement, dated June 28, 2002 that vests development at the Boeing 737 Manufacturing Facility (737 Logan Ave. N), the subject site, to the development standards established in 2002. The applicant has requested two variances from the vested 2002 development standards as follows: 1) A setback variance from RMC 4-2-130A, to allow a 5 foot setback instead of the required 20 feet and, 2) A landscape buffer variance to not provided landscaping along a property line where the adjacent use is public, instead of the required 5 foot wide landscape strip and solid 6 foot fence. The subject site is vested to Industrial Heavy zoning and is 151.94 acres is area. Overall the goal of the project is to provided for production rate increases to the 737 program. In addition to the variance request the applicant is requesting a shoreline exemption for the replacement of existing utilities in Apron D, which is within the 100 ft. buffer of the Cedar River. With the application a geotechnical analysis and strom water report was submitted. Review Type: Date Assigned: Community Services Review-Version 1 10/14/2015 Date Due: 10/28/2015 Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee Environmental Impact Earth Animals Air Environmental Health Water Energy/Natural Resources Plants Housing Land/Shoreline Use Aesthetics Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews Which types of com men ts should be entered: Light/Glare Hi stori c/Cultura I Preservation Recreation Airport Envi ronmenta I Utilities 10,000 Feet Transportation 14,000 Feet Public Service Recommendation -Comments that impact the project including any of the Enivornmental Impacts above. Correction -Corrections to the project that need to be made before the review can be completed and /or requesting submittal of additional documentation and/or resubmittal of existing documentation. What statuses should be used: Reviewed -I have reviewed the project and have no comments. Reviewed with Comments -I have reviewed the project and and I have comments entered in Recommendations. Correction/Resubmit -I have reviewed the project and the applicant needs to submit and/or resubmit documentation and I have added corrections in Corrections. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date -----~ NOTICE OF APPLICATION ~~·~::!~~:!'.:!:::::~::::~::11~~~'!'",:::;:,,~::::p:~.":::~~= P•bicAplU ....... PE!IMm/!IEVlfWR!QUESIUI< Varion,uandS~arolnoe .. mplloll APPlltANT/P"°*1"C01fT.cTPWQH: ~8~;~1~===:=SJW.{)'l,'Saotlla,WA PlEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUM8ER WtlEN CAW NG FOIi PROPER fllE IDENTIFICATION ;~~:'.:~1=:: '7,;::.::0: c~o'7i!'.~~~=!,~~:;';~::~:;:/::::•:::::~=·~~;tm~ter111• fol,Nomo/No. R•ntonAp<0nDUl1l•l~D/l\JAi5-000l49,V~R , ________ cl1y/~<a,oJZ1p:, ____ _ TELCPIIONOKI.: ______ _ I, \la1'1t','>JU: Dc,/k«-. , hereby certify that~ copies of the above document we~e posted in ----3_ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Signed: ~(t RMi; jQ;J!LCc CERTIFICATION Date:,---1..,I C<--1 ._-_,llf_--.J..;-'-s~-- STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Va,.">5.._ D 9 fluc signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated ::-ffe~~~,~~/( ?~~~"~'""~"·~~.f-i>dl'\ 3 ~ 01,.. ~ '§ • "'-. _'" § Notary (Print): I, lj $ • # noowe..s: ;, ~\ ~,,.,.f' g E --~~--+-...""'-""-------'\ ~ \,.,,·29·"" S" ==rv,y appointment expires: __ '"'A.."""''4\..L' .. ,'ir...,{_""'J"-:f,,_..2..._.i2"-'-Q~-----~ ~ ~~ u / i1,,,, 0,, Wfl,.S~----- 11\,,,, ... '-' Mark Clement, The Boeing Company Owner/ Applicant 300' Surrounding Properties See Attached (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary (Print): ____ ......,...,,.'t--""-"-""""'=--------------- My appointment expires: Renton Apron D Utilities D LUAlS-000749, SME, VA-A, VA-A template • affidavit of service by mailing Mark Clement BOEING COMPANY THE PO BOX 3707 MS lW-09 Seattle. WA 98124 823059027 7224500340 886600040 BNSF BR OTTEN LANN ETTE C CPT THE LANDING LLC PO BOX 961089 524 Burnett Ave N 10655 NE 4TH ST FORT WORTH, TX 76161 Renton, WA 98057 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 7225500100 7224500331 7224500335 CRECELIUS LEWIS Current Resident Current Resident 428 BURNETT N 532 Burnett Ave N 530 Burnett Ave N APT 13 RENTON, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 7224500335 7224500335 7224500335 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 530 Burnett Ave N APT 14 530 Burnett Ave N APT 10 530 Burnett Ave N APT 2 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 7224500335 7224500335 7224500335 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 530 Burnett Ave N APT 12 530 Burnett Ave N APT 3 530 Burnett Ave N APT 9 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 7224500335 7224500335 7224500335 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 530 Burnett Ave N APT 8 530 Burnett Ave N APT 11 530 Burnett Ave N APT 7 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 7224500335 7224500335 7224500335 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 530 Burnett Ave N APT 5 530 Burnett Ave N APT 4 530 Burnett Ave N APT 1 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 7224500335 7224500360 7224500360 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 530 Burnett Ave N APT 6 508 Burnett Ave N 510 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 7225500080 7225500080 7225500080 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 446 Burnett Ave N APT 202 446 Burnett Ave N APT 101 446 Burnett Ave N APT 201 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 7225500080 7225500080 7225500105 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 446 Burnett Ave N APT 102 16434 SE 235TH ST 426 Burnett Ave N APT 2 Renton, WA 98057 KENT, WA 98042 Renton, WA 98057 7225500105 7225500105 7225500105 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 426 Burnett Ave N APT 3 426 Burnett Ave N APT 4 426 Burnett Ave N APT 1 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 886600041 Current Tenant 727 N 10th St Suite C Renton, WA 98057 7225500080 HOOT CHERYLL 16434 SE 235TH ST KENT, WA 98042 7224500355 LEE JERRYW 514 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98057 7224500345 PEDEFERRI ERIC 520 Burnett Ave N Renton, WA 98057 7225500095 SHROYER LISA E 3420 13TH AVE W SEATTLE,WA 98119 7224500365 THOMPSON HEATHER 702 N 5TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 7225500115 ZURCHER ELIZABETH C+PHILIP 420 BURNETT AVE N RENTON, WA 98055 7224500360 7225500085 CUTTING LARRY D DUNLAP BAPTIST CHURCH 16919 150TH AVE SE 280 HARDIE AVE SW #2 RENTON, WA 98058 RENTON, WA 98057 886610010 7224500315 ITF DEVELOPMENTS LLC JEFFS AUTO REPAIR PO BOX 50268 21701 HWY 99 #A BELLEVUE, WA 98015 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 7225500110 7224500350 MOORE RUTH REUTIMANN MUNAGLIA DOMINIC A & TERR M 7025 116TH AVE SE 518 Burnett Ave N NEWCASTLE, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98057 Renton School District 403 7224500330 300 SW 7th SCHULTZ NORMAN CORP Renton, WA 98057 7634 5 SUNNYCREST RD SEATTLE,WA 98178 823059216 7225500075 SOUTHPORT LLC TAYLOR THOMAS L+DORIS 5 1083 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N SUITE 16383 SE 48TH DR 50 BELLEVUE, WA 98006 7225500090 TRAN PHUOC+THI NUOI FANG TU 438 BURNETT AVE N RENTON, WA 98057 7224500325 VIDELL VICTOR E+LANCE M 536 BURNETT AV N RENTON, WA 98055 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Randy, Vanessa Dolbee Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:08 PM 'randy.matheson@rentonschools.us' Setback Variance Application by Renton Memorial Stadium Notice of Application_Boeing Apron D_15-000749.pdf; Apron D COR Setback Variance 10-6-2015.pdf; Apron D COR Landscape Variance 10-6-15.pdf; 10-Site Plans.pd/; 12 - Architectural Elevations.pd/ The City of Renton has received a request far a setback variance from the Baeing Company to move a blast fence to be 5 feet from the north property line of the Renton Memorial Stadium site. The code would require a 20 foot setback. I would greatly appreciate the School District's review and comment on the subject request. Please find attached, the Notice of Application, the Applicant's variance justifications, the site plan, and architectural elevations of the blast fence. Comments are due by October 28, 2015, by 5:00 pm. If you have any questions or need additional information please let me know. Thank you, 'Vanessa 'lJo[/jee, Current Planning Manager Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division 1055 s Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425)430-7314 Denis Law .,, P"\ f City 0 ~ --=Mayor------1: ~<(~fill (((J\r-1 ..!.~WJl October 14, 2015 Mark Clement The Boeing Company PO Box 3707 MS lW-09 Seattle, WA 98124 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chip"Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application Renton Apron D Utilities D, LUAlS-000749, SME, VA-A, VA-A Dear Mr. Clement: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov ¢ ~OF ---------Renton NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: October 14, 2015 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: Renton Apron D Utilities O / LUAlS-000749, SME, VA-A, VA-A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Boeing Company and the City of Renton have entered into a development agreement, dated June 28, 2002 that vests development at the Boeing 737 Manufacturing Facility (737 Logan Ave. N), the subject site, to the development standards established in 2002. The applicant has requested two variances from the vested 2002 development standards as follows: 1) A setback variance from RMC 4-2-130A, to allow a 5 foot setback instead of the required 20 feet and, 2) A landscape buffer variance to not provided landscaping along a property line where the adjacent use is public,. instead of the required 5 foot wide landscape strip and solid 6 foot fence. The subject site is vested to Industrial Heavy zoning and is 151.94 acres is area. Overall the goal of the project is to provide for production rate increases to the 737 program. 1n addition to the variance request the applicant is requesting a shoreline exemption for the replacement of existing utilities in Apron D, which is within the 100 ft. buffer of the Cedar River. With the application a geotechnical analysis and storm water report was submitted. PROJECT LOCATION: 737 Logan Ave N PERMITS/REVIEW REQUESTED: Variances and Shoreline Exemption APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Mark Clement, The Boeing Company/PO Box 3707 MS lW-09/Seattle, WA 98124/206-617-2944/Mark.d.clement@boelng.eom Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager, Department of Community & Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 p.m. on October 28,. 2015. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager at (425) 430-7314. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: OCTOBER 13, 2015 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: OCTOBER 14, 2015 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CED, Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way1 Renton, WA 98057. File Name/ No.: Renton Apron D Utilities D / LUAlS-000749, VAR NAME:----------------------------------- MAILING AODRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip: ----------- TELEPHONE NO.: -------------- CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: October 6, 2016 To: City Clerk's Office From: Sabrina Mirante Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Renton Apron D, Utilities D LUA (file) Number: LUA15-000746, SME, VA-A, Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee Acceptance Date: October 14, 2015 Applicant: Mark Clement, The Boeing Company, PO box 3707 MS lW-09, Seattle, WA 98124 Owner: The Boeing Company Contact: Mark Clement, The Boeing Company, PO box 3707 MS lW-09, Seattle, WA 98124 PID Number: 0723059001 ERC Determination: Date: Aooeal Period Ends: Administrative Decision: Approved Date: November 13, 2015 Anneal Period Ends: November 30 2015 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Aooeal Period Ends: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Location: 737 Logan Ave N Comments: ERC Determination Types: DNS -Determination of Non-S1gn1ficance; DNS-M -Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated; DS -Determination of Significance. vVA I"{;,-00D7Y9 City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: Boeing Corp. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME Renton Apron D Utilties D ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave n. PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CITY: Renton ZIP: 737 Logan Ave n Renton WA 98055: 98055 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206 617-2944) APPLICANT (if other than owner) KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER($): 0723059001 Boeing NAME: Mark Clement COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing EXISTING LAND USE(S): Manufactoring ADDRESS: PO box 3707 MS 1W-09 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Manufactoring CITY: SEATTLE ZIP: 98124 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: UCN TELEPHONE NUMBER 206 617-2944 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): NA CONT ACT PERSON EXISTING ZONING Urban Center north 2 NAME: Mark Clement PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): same as existing COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing Co. SITE AREA (in square feel): 6,618,761 sq. ft SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE ADDRESS: 737 Logan Ave n. DEDICATED:none SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: CITY: Renton ZIP: ' 98055 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 206 617-ACRE (if applicable): NA 2944 Mark.d.clement@boeing.com NUMBER OF PROPOSED t.:o.hi)l_ipplk:able): NA ,. Q:v,,eh/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 09/15/15 Pl __ JECT INFORMATION (conti ed) r----'----_ _,______ __ ~I PROJECT VALUE: NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): D AQUJFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS (if applicable): D FLOOD HAZARD AREA ___ sq.ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): D GEOLOGIC HAZARD ___ sq.ft. NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if D HABITAT CONSERVATION ___ sq.ft. applicable): ¢{ SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES \\1 \ )Qq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): D WETLANDS ___ sq.ft. -----------·------------------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION __ , TOWNSHIP __ , RANGE __ , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) (\I) fa V'\~ C / C fVl C ...I I , declare under penalty of perjury undiar the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) __ the current owner of the property involved in this application orV __ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein ~""ct]•·--'"7 bol ~6 Maoo-• '"' """""" "'~"'" '"' """ Signature of Owner/Representative Date Signature of Owner/Representative Date STATEOFWASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that m 0,. IC C I ,rm"' f signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose mentioned in the instnument. +lo 1:1J Po U2.f(5 Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Rev: 02/2015 DEPARTMENT OF COM~ IITY Cityot AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: BY: BY: Arborist Report• \W Biological Assessment 4 Calculations 1 Colored Maps for Display 4 \ 1\0 Construction Mitigation Description 2AND4 Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication 1 Density Worksheet 4 1LD Drainage Control Plan, Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural, AND, Environmental Checklist 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy), •• ,, Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 1 .,04 Flood Hazard Data, {//f) No PIM ii PJ O<M. ~ Floor Plans 3AND4 l;t,b Geotechnical Report, AND3 Grading Elevations & Plan, Conceptual 2 v~ Grading Elevations & Plan, Detailed 2 V Habitat Data Report 4 l/U1) ii'"\ 61¥'-l:C<._IV\ ..sfudv. Improvement Deferral 2 f Irrigation Plan 4 PROJECT NAME: Ap® ]) UfJ Ii Hc.s DATE: ___._J_·-~/(p~-1. ....... S_.._ __ _ H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalreqs.docx Rev: 02/201S LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: BY: BY: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual, VLD Drcvd 1 th [Y1-~ h + Landscape Plan, Detailed 4 U\.etr n -1-t,.), Legal Description 4 Letter of Understanding of Geological Risk, VIL Map of Existing Site Conditions, u Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) 1 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 overall Plat Plan 4 Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Post Office Approval 2 Plat Name Reservation, Plat Plan, Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 !AD Public Works Approval letter, Rehabilitation Plan, Screening Detail 4 Shoreline Tracking Worksheet 4 Site Plan zAND 4 Stream or Lake Study, Standard, Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 S tree! Profiles 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 1 AND4 Topography Map, VI\. '.l:n~~ w/ 1.t+1 l1H.t ti Traffic Study , __, _J Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 UlD ·r:mv,c..t,_ in pn-,-;ed >Javh'T Urban Design Regulations Analysis 4 I Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final, Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\Plannlng\Waiversubmlttalreqs.docx Rev: 02/2015 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement, AND, Inventory of Existing Sites 2AND3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2 AND, Map of Existing Site Conditions , AND, Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations ZAND 1 This Requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2 Development Engineering Plan Review 3 Building 4 Planning WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: Vl,() H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self-Help Handouts\P1anning\Waiversubmittalreqs.docx COMMENTS: Vi O (j /JJff,,.1/1 ,l < ()'}1 ,(.i 7o . Rev: 02/2015 From Longacres Park Revised04,21"15 51 Washington -Renton North 8th and Logan Avenue North, Renton, WA 98055 52 53 54 LAKE WASHINGTON 55 • Employee gales • AMS Turnstile gates Fence lines Walking trails D Boeing property [] General parking [] Restricted parking @) Bus stop @ Helistop m Copyright2015-oTheBoemgCompanyAllnghtireserved Project narrative BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE GROUP RENTON WASHINGTON UPGRADE APRON D blast fence and screening variance To provide for production rates increase to the 737 program, Boeing is replacing existing electrical and mechanical utilities at its Apron D Flightline. Boeing is relocating an existing blast fence 1511 south which would be 5ft adjacent to the property line. The blast fence is being relocated to allow a longer airplane (the 737-900) to fit into the existing stall at D10 737 Logan avenue north Renton WA 98055 Main Boeing Renton Manufacturing plant Parcel number 0723059001 Master use permit/ Variance Zoning designation is Urban Center north 2. The Area of work in the shoreline zone is 117,150 Sq ft. The Cedar River & Lake Washington are the Special site features. Sandy silt loam is the soil type. Drainage to Lake Washington is from private storm water system to multiple outfalls to Lake Washington. Access to the project is 5TH Avenue North Nature of the existing shoreline: riverfront, channeled No proposed off-site improvements, or land dedications are part of the scope of this project. Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project is $7.8 million. The existing site is 100% impervious surface and no change will result due to the project. No trees or plantings are to be removed or disturbed as part of this project Contractor Job trailer will be located on or near project site Scope of work • The Blast Fence relocation area in the 200ft shoreline zone is approximately 1 O' in height by 70 lineal ft with a 600 SQ FT foundation, Note the total blast fence is 131 If ft and 1130 sq foundation Anticipated dates of work: 12/2015 -11 /2016, the project will be completed in phases to maintain the existing utilities for aircraft production Boeing will provide best management practices (BMPS) to prevent runoff and debris from entering the Cedar River, any soil piles will be covered with tarps and surrounded by silt fences until the soil can be removed or placed back in the excavated area Boeing will submit an erosion control plan to city of Renton for approval . ..... DDWL October 6, 2015 W.0.13726 Ms. Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA, 98051-3232 Subject: Boeing 737 Flightline Utilities Apron D-Setback Variance Dear Ms. Dolbee: On behalf of the Boeing Company, this letter includes our request for a code variance from the City of Renton required property line setback for the relocation of the existing an existing blast fence on Apron D. Variance Request: Apron parking positions for the 737 MAX aircraft manufactured at this site require significant area and are required to be accessed by a variety of operational traffic including equipment trucks, ttuck lifts and fire apparatus vehicles for emergency response. The parking positions require specific clearance criteria from adjacent aircraft and the planes must be towed into place along specific alignments. In order to utilize the southeasterly comer of Apron D, the position D-10 blast fence must be moved back 17' leaving 5' clear to the property line. In the pre-application conference Boeing was directed to submit a variance for the resulting IO foot encroachment into the 15 foot side yard setback. Variance Request Justification: Provided below is the justification requirements provided by the City of Renton required to be granted a variance along with ow· justification and explanation for the variance request with detailed response to each of the requirements. • The applica/11 s1iffers practical difficulties and unnecessaiy hardship and the variance is necessa,y because of special circumstances opplicoble to subject property, including size, shape, topography, and location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights ai1d privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; o Due to the orientation of the adjacent Cedar River and the location and orientation of the existing access bridge connecting the Apron D property with the Renton Airpo1t the southeasterly comer of the Apron D parcel does not provide the space needed in its current configuration to perform the manufacturing activities in compliance with development agreement entered into by Boeing and the City of Renton. Loss of the use of this corner of the property would require the property owner to relocation proposed manufacturing activities to another piece of property requiring substantial facility improvements at the relocated location. • The granting of the vai·iance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; o The granting of the variance will not change the use or activity at the site there by will not be detrimental to public welfare or irtjurious to the adjacent property. The adjacent property owned by the Renton School District and the property is used as an athletic field. The athletic field is behind the public stadium and track. The following are additional reasons the variance will not be detrimental: 425-869-2670 • 800-1165-9847 (fax) • 8420 154th Avenue NE • Redmond, Washington 98052 • www.dowl.com Alaska • Arizona • Colorado • Montana • No11h Dakota • Oregon • Washington • Wyoming Ms. Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton September 29, 2015 Page 2 The blast fence is an existing condition; the position D-10 currently parks a 737 and there are no operational changes being initiated, the blast fence is simply being relocated. Engine run up operations conducted by Boeing are coordinated such that the operations do not take place during the use of the field. This protocol will remain in place. The property is screened by landscape (School side), and the views will not be appreciably changed. The only change will be the blast fence will move closer to the adjacent prope1ty. The changed blast fence location will not impact the current operations of the Renton School District, the condition is (and remains) safe to the adjacent land user. The approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; and o The proposed blast fence relocation constitutes the construction of a screening and or protection fencing to protect the adjacent property from the exiting permitted manufacturing activities. This is a measure that the prope1ty owner is constructing at their own expense to reduce the effects of the manufacturing activities on the adjacent propctty. The adjacent airpmt property directly connected to the Apmn D through the Cedar River bridge contains several similar blast fences saturated directly adjacent to public rights of way. As a result of the cost incul'l'ed by the property owner to install the blast fence along with similar installations on surrounding propetties results in this not constituting a grant of special privileges. The approval is the minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. o The location of the existing bridge crossing the Cedar River reduces the use of the southeasterly corner of the property such that the corner is not suitable for use by the owner. The owner has evaluated the options for increasing the space available within that corner of the prope1ty and determined that the proposed shift in the blast fence will result in the minimum amount of space required with the minimum amount of impact to the adjacent propct1ies and Cedar River. We are formally requesting that we be allowed to encroach IO' into the 15' side yard setback as shown within the permit documents submitted along with this variance request. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, DOWL ~------- Travis W. Neu, P.E. Project Manager 425-669-2670 • 800-665-9847 (fax) • 8420154th Avenue NE • Redmond, Washington 98052 • www.dowl.com Alaska • Arizona • Colorado • Montana • North Dakota • Oregon • Washington • Wyoming A DDWL October 6, 2015 W.0.13726 Ms. Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA, 98051-3232 Subject: Boeing 737 Flightline Utilities Apron D-Landscape Variance Dear Ms. Dolbee: On behalf of the Boeing Company, this letter includes our request for a code variance from the City of Renton Landscape criteria for industrial zone abutting an adjacent commercial zone, as required by Renton Municipal Code 4-4-070 "Landscaping". As noted in Section R, to deviate from the provisions of 4-4-070 a variance must be submitted and approved pursuant to RMC 4-9-250B5 (listed in italics above). Variance Request Justification: Detailed below is the justification requirements provided by the City of Renton along with our explanation as to why this project should receive a variance and the measures that the project will take to mitigate any adverse effects that may be encountered by the adjacent property owners. • The applicant s,iffers practical difficulties and unnecessa,y hardship and the variance is necessa,y because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, and location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification; o With respect to the landscape variance, the current condition along the south prope1ty line is paved to the property line without screening or vegetation. Because the operations in the area of Apron Dare within an AOA (air operations area) Boeing follows the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) criteria for minimizing Foreign Object Debris (FOO). Specifically in the apron areas for Boeing properties that conduct aircraft operations, the Advismy Circular AC 150/5210-24Ailport Foreign Object Debris (FOD) Maiiagement is followed. The document provides direction on prevention, detection, removal and evaluation. This is not only constant with other adjacent aircraft facilities but is in compliance with federal guidelines adhered to nationwide for similar facilities. Foreign Object Debris (FOO) is "Any object, live or not, located in an inappropriate location in the ai1port e11viro11me11t that has the capacity to injure ailport or air ca1Tier personnel and damage aircraft". Further from AC AC 150/5210-24: "The presence of FOD on an ai1port's air operations area (AOA) poses a significant threat to the safety of air travel. FOD has the potential to da111age aircraft during critical phases of flight, which can lead to catastrophic loss of life and ail:frame, and at the ve1y least increased maintenance and operating costs. FOD haza,·ds can be reduced, however, through the i111plementatio11 of a FOD management program and the effective use of FOD detection and removal equipment. ''The sw:faces of all movement areas including pave111ents (runways, taxiways and aprons) and acfjacenl areas shall be i11spected and their conditions monitored regularly as part of an aerodrome preventive and corrective maintenance program with the objective of avoiding 425-869-2670 • 800-1165-9847 (fax) • 8420 154th Avenue NE • Redmond, Washington 98052 • www.dowl.com Alasl<a • Arizona • Colorado • Montana • North Dalwta • Oregon • Washington • Wyoming Ms. Vanessa Dolbee City of Renton September 29, 2015 Page 2 and eliminating any loose objects/debris that might cause damage to aircraft or impair the operation of aircraft systems. " • The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; o The existing condition is paved to the prope1ty line, the adjacent land use is a public athletic field. There is landscape screening on the public athletic field side of the property within a 20' sanitary sewer easement granted to Boeing. Maintaining the existing condition will not deprive subject prope1ty to rights and privileges as Boeing will be maintaining the existing landscape buffer that is within the 20' sanitary sewer easement. Being that the project proposes to maintain the existing conditions and use of the property there will be no detriment to the public. • The approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsisrent wirh the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; and o The prope1ty owner is in no way requesting special privilege nor will the owner benefit in any way beyond the ability to continue historic operations at this site. The variance is only being requested to maintain the pro petty owner's compliance with FAA regulations for this type of facility. Granting of this variance would be consistent with the current propetty use and adjacent airport and aircraft facilities landscaping requirements and conditions. 71,e approval is the minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. o Boeing prides itself as an environmental steward, trying to minimize and avoid environmental impacts in all of its operations. In addition Boeing prides itself on being a "good neighbor" contributing to the community in positive ways; Boeing goes to significant effo1ts to enhance the community with aesthetics associated with its facilities with improvements that are in keeping with the Renton Municipal Code criteria and of benefit to neighbors, employees and the larger community. To that end Boeing has always been willing and open lo providing landscaping and other community improvements where applicable and when possible. Ifnot for the specific and somewhat special requirements imposed on Boeing by the FAA for this type of facility landscaping would be provided at this location. We are formally requesting that the landscaping requirement for this project be waived based. on the justification provided within this variance request. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, DOWL Travis W. Neu, P.E. Project Manager 425-869-2670 • 800-865-9847 (fax) • 8420 154th Avenue NE • Redmond, Washington 98052 • www.dowl.com Alaska • Arizona • Colorado • Montana • North Dakota • Oregon • Washington • Wyoming SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 16625 Redmond Way, Suite M 1?4. Redmond. Washington 98052, \\\\\\.Soilt.q~ (t<;.l_n_m~ntal.i.:lllll (425) 8~£-586~ _____ _ Mr. Terry Lettie Construction Manager The Boeing Company Dear Terry: September 25, 2015 Letter Report Geotechnical Engineering Services Apron D Upgrade Boeing Renton Plant Per your request, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. (S&EE) has performed a geotechnical evaluation for the referenced project. We understand that the purpose of the proposed upgrade is to support the pre-flight functions of Boeing 737 Max jets. Specifically, the upgrade will include the installation of underground utilities, a new crew office and crew shelter, and tool cabana. The existing blast fend at the south side of the site may also be moved southward. Our scope of services has included the review of current site conditions, the proposed upgrade and our April-3- 2008 report that was performed for a previous project onsite. This report is attached to this letter report. Our recent site visit showed that the site conditions have not been changed since year 2008. We therefore believe that no new field exploration is necessary, and all our geotechnical recommendations in our April-3- 2008 report are applicable to the current project. We recommend that the geotechnical recommendations in our April-3-2008 report along with a few supplemental recommendations presented herein be utilized for the current project. Foundation Support We recommend that the blast fence be supported on spread footings that can be designed with an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf (pounds per square feet). Other recommendations including lateral and upward capacities are presented in pages 4 to 5 of the attached April-3-2008 report. E.n·m·ation ,'}'/wring am/ S'uhgrade Preparution In addition to sheetpiles, other shoring methods using trench boxes and steel sheets can be considered. Figure 3 in our April-3-2008 report shows the soil parameters for any shoring method that requires structural designs. 1510rpt ,., I I Mr. Terry Lettie September 25, 2015 Page 2 All loose soil cuttings at the excavation subgrade should be removed prior to the placement of bedding materials. Wet and loose subgrades should be anticipated. The contractor should make efforts to minimize subgrade disturbance, especially during the last foot of excavation. Subgrade disturbance in wet and loose soil may be inevitable, and stabilization is necessary in order to avoid re-compression of the disturbed zone. Depending on the degrees of disturbance, the stabilization may require a layer of quarry spalls (2 to 4 inches or 4 to 6 inches size crushed rock). Based on our experience at Boeing Renton plant, when compacted by a hoepac, a 12 to 18 inches thick layer ofspalls would sink into the loose and soft subgrade, interlock and eventually form a stable subbase. A chocker stone such as 1-1/4" clean crushed rock should be installed over the quarry spalls. This stone should be at least 6 inches in thickness and should be compacted to a firm and non-yielding condition by a vibratory plate compactor that weighs at least 800 pounds. In the event that soft silty soils above groundwater table are encountered at subgrades, the subgrade should be over-excavated for a minimum of 6 inches. A non-woven geotextile having a minimum grab tensile strength of200 pounds should be installed at the bottom of the over-excavation and the over-excavation be backfilled with 1-1/4" minus crushed rock. The material should be compacted to a firm a non-yielding condition by the same vibratory plate compactor. Dewutering Dewatering will be required for excavations deeper than the groundwater table. A shallowest groundwater table is expected at a depth of 4 feet below ground surface. Since the depth of groundwater will fluctuate with seasons and precipitation, we recommend that the contractor measure the depth through a pothole prior to excavation. Based on our experience with the similar subsoils, we believe that for excavation shallower than 5 feet, dewatering can be successful using local sumps. The contractor should install sumps at locations and spacing that are best fitted for the situation. To facilitate drainage, the sump holes should be at least 2 feet below the excavation subgrade. Also, the granular backfill around the sump should make hydraulic connection with the crushed rock and quarry spalls placed for subgrade stabilization. For excavation deeper than 5 feet, our experience at Boeing Renton Plant has shown that well-points at 5 to 8 feet spacing have provided adequate dewatering. The contractor may need to retain a dewatering specialist for a detailed dewatering design. Seismic Consideration The geotechnical-related parameters to be used for seismic design in accordance with 2012 IBC provisions are evaluated as described in Section 1613.3 of the 2012 IBC Code. The spectral response accelerations for the "Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake" (MCER) were obtained from the USGS website using a latitude of 47.493 degrees and a longitude of 122.216 degrees. The values for Site Class B (rock) are: 1510rpt Mr. Terry Lettie September 25. 201, Page 3 The values for Site Class B (rock) are: Ss = 1.455 g s, = 0.545 g (short period, or 0.2 second spectral response) (long period, or 1.0 second spectral response) The Site Class is selected using the definitions in Chapter 20 of ASCE 7-10 considering the average properties of soils in the upper I 00 feet of the soil profile at the site. Using the boring data obtained from current and previous projects, we estimate that the average standard penetration resistance (N) in the upper 100 feet is 7. This value corresponds to Site Class E ("Soft Clay Soil") in Table 20.3-1 (ASCE 7-10). The site coefficient values, obtained from Section 1613.3.3 of the 2012 IBC, are used to adjust the mapped spectral response acceleration values to get the adjusted spectral response acceleration values for the site. The recommended Site Coefficient values for Site Class E are: F,= 0.9 F, = 2.4 (short period, or 0.2 second spectral response) (l .O second spectral response) ••• I appreciate the opportunity to provide our service. Should you have any questions or require any additional inforrnation please let me know anytime. Attachment: S& EE April 3, 2008 Report 1510rpt Yours very truly, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. C.J. Shin, PhD, PE President REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAI. STUDY APRON D FABRIC HANGAR RENTON. WASHINGTON S&EE JOB NO. 802-1 APRIL 3, 2008 S&EE S'-~EE SOIi & E\:VlllON\IFNl Al. EN(il1'LFR<;. l'<C _lf)J~~-~ _!i_c_Q_mnnd \Vm. Su1tl? rv1 12-L Redmond. \\'a~hi1_1m0.n. 1?~~l_52_. U~~1B6~--~~(lX __ L~.\~_JJ~~ 86Q_-_7J;_'. Mr. I lans-llcnrik Soren,cn. P.L file Boeing Company P.O. llo., 3707. MC 61-90 Scat11c. WA 481~4-2207 CC: Mr. S1c,c Lusk. AIA. PE. LEED. AP '.\1r. Pat Harrigan. P.F. Dear Hans: April 3. 20118 Report Geotedmkal Study !\pron D Fabric I langnr Bt>eing Renton Plant We are pleased to present here\\ ith ot1r Report of G,·otochnical Study for the rctcrcncc<l project. Our servic\:'s "~r1: authorized by Mr. Jobn Angel. and ha\c been pro\·ided in accordanct:: ,,ith our proposal dated D~ccmbcr '!.7. 2007. V1/c appreciate tht: oppoii1111ity to provide our sen ice~. Slwuld you ha\rc any questions regarding the t:ontcnts of thij report or require additional infCtrmation. plt:asl.:' contact the 11nder,ig11c-d. Very truly yours. ",l)JI_ & ENVIRONMrN I /\I ENGINrERS. INC. ./ -,J <;., ~~.:.:..-- C. J. Shin. Ph.D .. P.l President S&EF IABLr ur CONTINTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... I '.0 SIT[ HISTORY ................................................................................................................................................... I 3.0 SliRFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................. 2 3. I SURFACE CONDITIONS ... 3.2 SUBSURFACL CONDITIONS ... 3 3 GROUNDWATER CONl)l'fJONS .. 2 .. 2 U CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................. 4 4.1 FOLNDATION SUPPORT.. 4.2 TEMPORARY EXCAVATIONS . . 1.J l.NDERGROUND U1 IL.ITV INSTALLATION .. 4.4 LATERAi. EAR rl·I PRl:SSURES ON RJ:TAINING WALLS 4.5 SITE PRFPARATION AND STRUCTURAL FILL ........ 4.6 SI.AR-ON-GRADE ............................... .. 4.7 SEISMIC CONSIDERA flONS 4.8 ADDITIONAL SF.RV ICES ......................... .. .......... 4 . ..................................................... {) ... s .. ..... 11 ............ I:! ......... 12 . .................... 14 5.0CLOSURE ........................................................................................................................................................... 14 FIGURE I: SITE LOCATION MAP flGURF 2: SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN rlGL'RE 3: LATERAL LOAD ON SHEET PILE WALL FIGURE 4: Sl!RCHARGE-INDlJCED LATERAL LOADS APPENDIX i\: LOGS OF PREVIOUS RORINCS 802-lrpl REPORT OF GEOTECH:'l!ICAL STl1llY APRON I> FABRIC HA;>;<.AR RENTON. WASHINGTON For The Boeing Company 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of 0ur geotechnical ,tud~ for thc-rdCrencct.i project. ri,c project sit,: is located at the s1i.1uthwcst p\,rtion of Boeing Renton Plant. A site lot.:'.atil1n map is sho,,n in Figure 1 and a site plan is shown in Figure 2. both are included at the end ,,fthis rep,,rt. \ve understand that the prnposeci hangar ,viii have a frn..1tprint of I 52 t~d b_\ 152 fCct. The hangar will hc a clear-span strui.::turc ,, ith mc-t;,t I frames spaceJ at 19 feet on center. Based on the loading. infomrntion pn)\ ided to us. Jo,, 11\\ ard dead am.I live loads art! 9, 76 and 35.83 1-.ips, re~pectivel). Ma.,imum sno,, load is expcl.'tcd 10 be 25.J kip.\ and ma.,imum upward wind load will be 31.15 kips. V,/c further understand that the c~isting coni:.;rctc slab-on-grad~ i~ l :! inches thick with 12 inchcj thkk bast.:: ct\llrse. Th~ existing ~lab ,\'ill he removed for foundation construction and underground utilitic:,., ins1allation. Concrete slab~on~gradc witl be re•constructcJ to the cun-cnt grade and the slab\\ ill suppC"lrt the ~ame aircraft traffic lnnJ. Nc,1, underground utilitic~ \\ ill in1.:h1dc storag~ vaults. pip~s-iJIH.I trend1c,;. rhc bottom of the vault:;" ill be about 8 feet below the g,n.1und surface and the bottom lif lhc pipes. and trenchL's arc expected to be about 2 to 3 feet in depth. 2.0 SITE HISTORY Published geologic map ( US'C~.\" G"ologic AhtJJ rflhc Remon <Jnadrungle. Kini ( ·uuul_r. tJ"ushinghm /1y n. N_ 1\Jullinewff. JY65) indit..::atcs that l'l.:'dar River have mcarn.lcred through ,,ariolh po11io11s of the city since last glaciations and deposited alluvial soils ,vhich consist of loose and unc-nnsolidatcd -.cdi111i:11ts cxll:11<.ling lL' I 00 feet or more in depth. The upper portion of these -;11ib is fypii..:ally ~oil and LIIH.:onsnlidatcd. A Jiqudilctio11 map (I'relimi1uu:1· li(JW.:/C.1ctirm Su.,n'plifiili11· _\la11 t?/ the l?emon {!uadnmgle. Jl"a.\hingt1m In /W:'.'.·lrpl S&H Stcphr!,, Pu/mer) imJicatc~ 1hn1 the prn_1ect area ha ... l11gh liqud:1ctron ~usi..:cpt1hrlit) Bnsi:d nn 1h~ as-huilt grading phrn for Apron D (re/l•rcnn•: c;rwling Ami P,ll'ing. _./n:a I. Sl,ce1 _.\o. ( ·_,..,. daled J-}-66 and pre1"wi:d hy Ll'o .·I. Dair & .·lssodatc\ L the site grade-\\as raised b~ ahout 25 h) 3.5 li::L·t during the site dc,clopmenl in 1966. 3.0 SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONl)JTIONS 3.1 SliRFACECONDITIONS The site is bordered hy Cedar Rider to the west. Renton Stadium lo the south. a surfol.:e parking to tht· cast and North 6111 Street to th~ north. The entire /\pron Dis CO\ered \\ ith ~(.'ncretc slab-on-grade and the site area and its vicinity are relative!~ llat. rhc side slope of the river emhankmcnt i~ about 31·L l V and the total height of the embankment is ahl)lll 15 feet. During 3 site visit on f-ehrual") 25. 2008. ,._,e obscned about 3 to .:t leet deep of water in the river. 3.2 SUBSllRFACE CONDITIONS Four previous soil test borings \Vere drilled at rhc location of the propo~ed hangar. The appro,\imate locations of theses borings are shown on Figure 2 and rhe boring logs arc included in Appendix A. rhc~e horings wen~ drilled by previous Dames & Moore Compan~ in 1965 during the development of the area. V..-'c found that these boring data are adequate for our geotcchnical study a11d concluded that additional exploration is not necessary. The borings slu.rn, that prior lo th~ site development in 1965. the site is cnvcrcd b~ ahmn one to t\n) f'cct thick of fill. Since the site grade was raised b) 2.5 to 3.:5 f"ect at the time. we expect about 3 to 5 fed l)f total till thickness current!)' at the proposed hangar location. The boring, logs show 1hat lhc fill material 1s a compaC"t mi:\.turc of sand and gravel (pitrun fill). Bas.ed on our projects ~xpt.•ricncc at Boeing Rcnttin Plant. this l)pC of fill is common I) found near the ground surface and \.\C e:\pc...:t thal similar material \\as usi:d tl, raist.• th~ site grade to the current level. ~W.:!-lrp1 S&l'E I he bnring lugs alsn show thal the fill \\as umkrlain by allu1,lal suil-. \,hi1,:h 111clud1,.· ahnu1) l\) I=' fc('t tl11d. nf tine h) 1111:dium s~1nd hL'lo,, tlll.:' till. The '.\an<l i~ in tum underlain h~ intcr-bl.'ddt..:d lay1,.·r, of ..;and. ,;ill. ,;jlt) srrnd and peat. I hesc materials V:l';I from soil tn medium dense and ~,tend to the ma\imum depth nf es.ploratinn at <.thout -to tC'ct. Wl· expect the~!.' intl.!'r-beddcd 111a1erials C\'.tend hi n depth of about 100 fi.:t.:t \Ve do not anticipate: any ha,ardou::, \\ask 111a1erials onsitc. fhb a:::oslllllpttnn i.::an he i...:ontirrncd during "x,nstruction. 3.3 GROl)NDWATER CONDITIONS rhc hnring. logs recorded ground,\atcr dcp1hs at .l to 5 feel heh.)\\ thi: rrc-<lc\elupmcnt ground surfm .. ·c (about 5 to 8 feet hck1,, the ~xisting top of slab). Thcs~ depths \.\en: re~orded iu latc No\'ember 1965. Based on our 1.!Xpericncc in the project area. \\·t? anticipate that the groundwater depth \\ill tluctuafc \\ ith st~ason and precipitation, and may val} from -l tn 8 feet hcln\\ the ~:-..isting tl1f1 of slab. \Ve further believe that the groundwater table is connected to the water bod) in the ncarhy rivt!'r. Rn::!-lrpt S&EE 4.0 CONCLUSIONS ANU HECOMMFNDATIONS .J I FOUNDATIO'.'J St 'PPORI We recommend that the proposed fahric hangar hr supported on tom,e11t1onal spread fi.1otings. Dct3ils of 11ur rect)111111endations regarding li.1,1ti11g design and cnnstructinn are presented bcloJ\\. Bearing Capacitv: We recommend an allowable bearin~ pressure or 1.500 rsf (pounds per square foetJ for the frmling. design. This value includes a safet: factor of at least 2. and (..;an he increased h) onc~third ti..1r wind and seismic loads. Scnlcnu:nt: Column footings designed in ;;u.;\:ordani..:c \\ ith tht' abm-e recommendations arc ex1:tectcd to C:'1..flel'it:nce appro:\imatcl) 1/.:! to 3/4 inch of total scttlt:1nent. About 70 percent nfthis settlement will n:sult from the cnnsolida1ion of the soft silt layer at the dcplh of 15 to 20 feet. The consolidation II ill take ahout a le\\· ,,eeks to complete alkr thl~ full column load~ arc applied. DillCrcntial settlement bct\\een adjacent fc,otings is expected to he 1/4 to 1 /~ ofan inch. Resistance to Lateral Load: Lateral resistance can be obtained from the passi1,.c earth prc~sun.._. against footings and grade beams. fhc pressure can be obtained using an equivalent fluid density of ~50 plnmd:-. per cubic foot (pct). Lateral resistance can also de,·elop at the bottom of footing and slab. A coefficient ,11 friction nf0.4 can be used for the frictional resistance. fhc abo,·e values induJe a satt"ty factor of J .S. Resistance to Um,,ard Load: Up,\•ard resistance can be obtain~d from the combination of submerged footing wt>ight. soil weight above the footing. and frictional rc~istuncc against pull uul. A unit v,.cighl llf 130 pounds per cubic reel (pct) ca11 be assumed for the soil. The pull nut resistance can be c,aluatcJ U'\ing a lateral ea11h pressure of60 pcfcquivalcnt lluid c..lcnsit) anc..l friction co~t1icient of0.5. rhis frictional force \\ ilJ act on the soil column above the fc,oting and on the fr1oting side5. Footin.£.]il!Q£!1!<k_P~lli!!fil.jon: All footing subgradcs shuul<l he inspected by a qualilie<l gcotechnical 1:nginecr prior to re-bar and concrete placements. The subgradc s0il slwuld be a material 1hat is non- twg.unic~ finn and non-yielding. Based on the available data. wi: bclie,c that the suhµ.radc material ,\ill consist ofa relative!) compact. granular soil (existing filf). Howe\.cr. iflono;;c. soft. \\Ct nr othen,ise X0:2-lfpl S&f.F. unstable soils are encountercJ a1 tile "::>ubgradc. tht: suhgrat.h: ~hnuld be \1\-l'r-c~Ul\at<.:d l(Jr 2 led. I Ii..: o\i...'1~ c\.CU\atinn should e\.k:nd outv.ard from the ...:dgc t,f fooling l{ir a hori,ontal Jistann.· l)f ~ ll!L"t I he n\L'r· t·,cm a1ed subgraJe :-.hould he Je,-eled and (:kancd nf an) lotl",L' :-.nil i.::u1ting. /\ la} L'r llf ,H)\ en gcotc,ti!t.: ha, ing a minimum grah tensile strength nf 300 rlounds should bt: install~d at the subgnuk. rht o\.L'r~ t:.\C-3.\ at ion should 1hen he bac~tilled nith strt1c1Ural till. the material and compact inn n.:t.1L11rcmi;:nts of\\ hid1 j,.; prcse11te<l in Scctit.lll 4.5. All footings should be founded at least 18 inches bclt)w the adjacent finished grad~ to proYide protection against frost action. footing Drain: Ba::,ed on the surface lOpt"lgraphiL and s:uhsurface conditions. \\"l' do not anticipatt.' an.; suhsurface Oo\\' at 1he footing le,el once the area is co\crcd \\·ith 1..'.0ncrc1c slab. \\'e thus believe fnoling. drain is not necessary. Corrosi\·it\. Based on our experience \\itll previous projct:ts in thr general area. \\·C arc of the opinion that the potential of onsite soils and imported fill reacting \Vith normal ~nncrctc is lo". ·we bdievc no pr('vcntivc measure is required. however. this should be confirmed by a qualified geolcchnical engineer nl tl1e time of construction . .i.2 l'EMl'ORARY EXCAVATIONS \Vhcn lempora[) excavations are required <luring. construction. the t;onlrat.:tor slwuld fullo\\ the publi°'hcd safot)" regulations and he responsible for the safety of their personnel and equipment. l"hc folkwvings cul angles are provided as a gcnt:"ral reference. The contractor shall flatten th4..' cut ~lopes or install shoring if found necessary. For temporni;, excavations Jess than~ fod in depth. the cut bank may be i:.,cavated vertlt.:ally. hl1 1cmporary c:,.;.ca\-ations greater than 2 t~et in d~pth and abovi.:: ground,\alt:r tabk. thi..: ..:ul 111a~ be .;k1ped at 1.SH:1\1. ~02-1rr1 ·1 . .1 \INOFRGROliND llflLITY IN~ I Al.LA flCJN As pre, iousl~ mentioned, underground utilities inc:luding ~tnrage Htults. pipe:-.. and trenches arc proposed. ·1 he bottom oftht! vaults \\ill be about 8 feet hekw .. th~ ground ':lottrfitl.':C and thi.: ln1t10111 nflh~ pipes an<l trenches are expected t,, be about c to 3 feet in depth. BEDDING All underground utilities should be bedded with al least 3 inches thick of a beddin!,' material that meets WSOOT aggregate specification 9-03.12(1) and have the foll,ming gradation: BACKFILL Sieve Size I-inch 1/4-inch US No. 200 Sand E.quivalent Percent Passing 100 25-80 15 max. 35 min. Structural fill materials should be used for excavation backfill. The material and compaction requirements for structural fill are presented in Section 4.5 of this report. INSTALLATION The pipes and trenches can be installed in temporal) excavations. H,1\\ever. the excavation for the deep vault may encounter groundwater that necessitates sheet pile walls. Open cut with de\,,atcring will be difticult as the groundwater table is likely connected to the water hod} in the ncarb} ri,cr and the sand near the bottom of the excavation is relatively permeable. We recommend that a pothole be exca,ated at the time of construction. If the pothole sh,H\S rlrnt the groundwalcr table is within two feet from the botwm of the excavation. sheet pile \Valls should he installed. The geotedmit·al parameters for the design \Jfthc wall arc prescnteJ hdov .. " S&f.E I .ah.'ral Pri.;'ssure:,,. t'll Ca1u i lcn:reJ Shed Pile Wall: Based i1n our c,·aluati1 in.;,_ \\c rccum1rn."1HI that the :,;h(:"ct pile \\all he dc.;;igncd \\ ith the lateral prcssuri.:s slHJ,\.11 or1 Figun.:-.t \\'c l"urthcr ren1mmenJ that th~ des.ign includes a minimum nf one-ft..tot thid. mud slab at the bounm Pr the, aulh Lateral Dcllection: A soil reacrion modulus (lf-W pci (pounds per cubic i11i.:llcs) i:,,. recommc11d1..·d Depending on tilt! :sek<.:11:d sheet pile section. rclali\·cl) large ,kll~cti\)11. \lll the nrJ~r nra tc,v inches llli.l) 0L1..'.t1f at the top of the pile. This deflection should he 1akt.:'n inh1 account for the si1c (1fthc 1211closurc-. De" atcrinu: Based on the boring data. a relative!) impcnneablc silt layer is present at a depth of 20 lect (belo\\ the top of existing slab). This layer should effeclivdy cut off groumh,ater inl111\. Hnwe, er. in the t'.\·t:nt that such cut 0ff layer is absc-nt or non-continuous. a ground,\oatcr inlln\ of ahout 1.000 gallons per day can occur. This now rate is estimated using a l\h)-dimcnsional no\\ net anal)sis wi1h a soil permeability of 5* l 0~ cm/sec ( 1 * I 0-1 ft/min} for the sand la)er. l'hc result also shows an exit gradient of 0.2. (A value of 1.0 would represent a quh;k condition). Based on the estimated tlm\ rate and exit grm.iiL·nt. we believe that the flow can be handled by pumping from sump holes at the base of the c:,.;.cmatklll, ~ubgrade Preparation: V,/c rcc{11111ncnd that a 12-inch thick mud slab be instrilkd at the ba:,.c 1Jf the exc.-a\atiun. Soft and wet 5ubgrade ma) be encountered. In the C\ent that th1..· 'lubgrade is so soft and unstahle that the mud slab cannt>t h~ poured. ab,,ut 12 inches ot' subgrade soil should be rerml\·e<l and lhc subgradc established \\·ith quan)' spalls of 2 lo 4 inches in pm"ticle size. The spalls would typical!~ interlock. and fonn a stable base. Some form of compaction. such ;1s using the bui..:ket of the ex~a\ator tl1 tamp on the 4uarf) spalls. is needed. About tv.o inches thick of choci-cr stone such as 1-114" crushed rock slwuld be placed over the quarr)' spalls prior lo mud slab pour. A qualilied geotedmical engineer should ob.serve the e;,.;,cavation and provide neccssal)' recommendations hascd on the in~jitu cornJitilln~. Beari11g_Capacit\ and Settlement Potential: Assuming that the shecl pile \\all is installed and suhgrade i-. prepared according the recommendations stated above. \\C belie,e that the ,;ubgradc \\ill have au alll.m·ablc hearing capacity of 1.500 rsf This value includes a salety liictor of at least~-Depending on the subgradc c,,ndition, the total settlement rnay be less than Y, inches a lier baci-till. We ,rnticipatc thal 11,c ,enlemcnl \\ ill be elastic in nature and essentially fini:,::;h upc,n the completion fJfthc had.fill. S&EE ~1rdR.~J?Jill11.:c; l"hc buoyanc) ron.:i..: ,.;an he re~i:-.kd by the friction hct\\et'n tht" \;Hilt \\Jlls and s.uhsoils. rl11: resistance can be cakula1t:d using. a lateral earth prcssurts ~,r 20 pl,,.'r t..·qui\ aknt fluid tk·nsit: and a fricti1..111al cocllicicnt of0.4. Both \alucs include a sali.:t) fadnr of l .5. Soil and1ors can b.; Ctmsic.lcrcd fix additional up,1i,ard resistance. Based on th~ charactc..~ristic~ nfthi..: soil under!) ing the site. ,\e recommend helical ancht1rs fi.1r the purpn,c. The helical plate of th .. · anchor should he cmhcddcd at least IO feet bdo" the bottom of the ,,rnlt,. "I he follm, ing anchor ,·apacitics arc rccomm1.mdcd for design. These capacities include a sali:ty factor of at least ~- Helical Plat Diametcr_(lli£bfi) Mk,wable Up\\ard Capacit, (kip,;] 6 4 8 5.5 10 7.0 12 8.0 4.-l LATERAL EARTI I PRESSURES ON RETAINING WALLS Lat~ral l.!arth pressures on retaining walls or p~nnancnt subsurface \\alls. and resistance tu lateral loads may be estimated using the following recommended soil parameters: Equivalent Fluid Unit Weight (PCF) Coellicicnt of Friction Acti,·e At-rest Passi\·e Nati,e Soils or 40 50 :?50 0.4 Structural Fill Note: Hydrostatic pressures are not included in the abo,e lateral ea11h pressures. The active case applit.·s to walls that arc permitted to rotate or translate c:t\\ay from the retained soil b) apprnximatcl) 0.002H. where II is the hei1sht of the \\all. This \\Ollld be appropriate for a cantilc\er retaining \\all. rhc al-rest c.:a.se applies to unyieh..ling ,,alls. and \\Ould hl· appropriah: for \\alls that are }l1J::!-!rp1 8 S&EE ~tructurall} ,c..,traincd fr(llll lakral ddkl..'.tillll '..'-Ul..'.h a~ b,t...,1..·mc111 \\alls. u1il1ty tn:11L:h1..•::, and pll:'.'1-. SL1RCHARGlc INUL CHJ L\ Jt:K,:\L LO,\J~ Additional lalt"ral earth prc:,:-.urc~ \\ill rt·~ult t"rom :-.urcharg.e loads from ..;lab tliat i..; kK3kd immediate!} atljac..:-111 to the \\all,. 1-hr.! -,urchargc·induccd !,Heral ca11h prc..;..,un.;':'.-nn: uniform tn er th1.: dcr1h 1)f tliL" \\nll. Sun:harge-imiul."'.cd lateral pressures for the "acti,e" case 1mt) h~ ,;,:alculatcd h) mullipl: ing. the appli~d \'l.:'rtical prl:!~sure (in psi) to the active earth prcs~urr.:-crn . .'fTicit=-nt (ha). The \.alue uf Ka ma) h(,," tnkc11 as 0.4. The surcharge-induced latt·ral prc-s.surt's for the 11 at~rcst 11 case ar(." ,;;imilarl)-calculated u~ing. an at-rc..-.t earth pre.;;surc coefficient (Kn) of0.5. For surchargt:". loads such as footings that are not adjai..:cnt to the \\'all. the indm.:ed lateral earth pressure\\ ill depend on the magnitude of the surcharge and th\;' di~tancc from tht."! \,all. Such induced Jatcral ll13d can be estimated using the 1.:{JUations. sho\\11 on Figun.:-l SEISMIC INDL'CED LATERAL LOADS For seismic i11Juccd lateral loads. the dynamii.: forcl.:'. can he assumed h) ai.;1 at 0.6 H above thl..' "all base and the mag.nitudc can he cakulated using: the ti.)lhwving cquatil1n: Pe \Vlierc Pe y II 3/S*y*l-l'*a seismic-induced lateral load ~ soil densit) ~ 130 pcf ~ ""' I height horizontal acceleration c=. 0.25g BACKrJLL IN FRONT OF RETAINING \VAi.LS Bad,,till in fmnt of the \\·all should be stnH.:tural till. l he matt!rial and compaction rt·q11in:mt:-11ts arc prcst:mcd in ScLtion 45 of this report. The Jcnsitics l1f tht: struclural till can he: a:-.~lHllCJ In b1t..· 130 pound ... per l.'Ubic ti.:et ( pct) ahovc gmund\\atcr table-and 70 pcf bch.)\\· ground\\.alcr table: SIIJ-lrpl s&F.E BAlKFILL~BEltll'\D RE L'\l'\IMj WAI.LS If the hydruslatic prcs:_..ure is included in the d~sign. :,;tructural fill material can be used l(lr backlill behind th~ \\alls. llowc\'er. if drainage is required bd1ind the \\all. thl' backfil\ ..,hould he frce-drainin~ mntt:rials \\hich arc t~picall~ granular ~oils. containing le~~ than 5 percent lines ts.ill and cla)-particle.,) ~md 1H1 part ides greater than -t inches in diamL"ter. The backfill mtilcric1I shoulJ he plact.?d in 6 to 8-inch thick horiZl)llt:1l lit1s and compactetl to at least 95 percent nfthe ma.\imum dcnsit! in accordance with ASTM D- I 55 7 te~t procedures. Care must be taken ,, hen ('.l)mpacting backfill adjacent to retaining \\alls. lo a\ oid creating excessiYc pressure on 1hc ,val I. DRAINAGE BEl!IND RUAINIJ\G WALLS Unless the wall is designed to support the hydrostatic pressure. a rigid. pcrforaled drainpipe ~hnuld he installed behind retaining walls. The drainpipes should he at least ,~ inches in <liamcl~r. 1.:ovi.:n:d by a la_ycl' of unifo1111 size drain gravel of at least I: inches in thil.·\...ncss. and be connccte-d to a suitable discharge location. An adequate number of clcanouts should be installed along the drain lint! tl.1r future 111aint~1mn\!e. Ill S&f.f. .J.5 .,, , ~-PRl·l',\R,\ I ION 1\M) s nu C JTIR,\L FILI J\ Iler the rcnHJ\ al 01·e\.1sting \.'.'Oncn:tc slah .111d l;''.\l'a\·ation h) tht' de-.ign q1bgradl'. thC' -.,uhgrw..h.: '.',h\ 1uld tl1cn he thorough!~ prn1.lf-rulkd us111g he•I\! con~tructi1..1n i.:4uipmc1ll. :\rcas ,,hid1 an: fuuml to be lon~c. soft '''-'I, \lJ" \\hich contain vrg.anic "'r,ils shl)lJld he o\cr-e\.canth:.·ti. 'rhe proof-rollini; ,;;ht\Uld he t1bscrvc<llpcrfonncd b~ a qualified g.enkchnical engineer. l'hc cnginc.:cr shall cvaluat(' the n\.cr-exc1l\·atio11 n:quircmcnts and pm, ide reCl)lllJHfndations regarding the use nr get)t..:\.tilc. if needed. After sLripping. O\·Cr-e.,cavation and exen,ati{.-'11 to the dc~ign g.radc, ihc top l ~ im:hcs orthc on~ite soils should he re-compacted to at least 95% of their maximum d1') den":iit: as detcrmined using AS IM l). J 557 test proccJurcs ( Modified ProclOr test). Structural Jill should he placed in the fill area,. The s1rucrnral till materials should meet both the material and 1.:ompat·titlll 11..·quircmc-11b prc.<,cnh:d heln\\. ~II~-I rp1 M~tcrial R~quiremcnts: The suitahilil) nfstnH..:tural till matcrial ~hould he t:nntinm.:d by a qualilicd geott:dmical engineer prior to 1b, use. rh~ material i;;htmld be fret.:' of t)rganic and fro1cn matter~ and -.hnuld consi~t of hard <lurahlc particle~. The c:xi~ting. till soil \\'ithin 3 tn-l foct hclo\\ the existing slab is likely suitable for us~ as structural lill. Tht..' nati\·c soils bclnw the fill are likd) 1w1 suitable. Imported structural fill materials can include san<l. silt) :.-.and. sand anU gran;I (pitrun). i...t1 1.·111shcd 1-ecycle i:oncrete. Placemclll and ConwacJionJk.m1in:mcnt~: Structural till :o.ht,uld be p)ui;ctl in ltlOSc hnriztmwl lilh not exceeding a thid •. ness of 6 tt, 1 ::! inches. t.lcp~11ding tm the material l) pc. compac1ion i.:quipmcnt. and number of'pa.sses made by th~ ~quipment. \Ne rccomml;!nd that the structural till materials h..: i.;ompacted to at least 95{\;0 \.1ftheir maximum dr} (knsil) a;', Jetenninl..'d u:-;ing .i\s·1 M I)~ 1557 tc'it procedures (Modified Proctor test). 11 S&f.E H, SLAB-ON-GRJ\D~ In order h1 promote uniform jupport and prn\·ilk a capillar~ hrcak. \\e ll.'C\'lll1llcnd that 1he .... lab be 1rndcdain b) a I ::!-ini..:h thk~ la)Cr ..._1fcrushcd n.)ch base 1..'ourst'. The nmterial should mcc1 \VSDOT aggn:_y.ak ~pcdlkillio11 9-03.913) and lwH: the folio\\ ing. gradatil 1n: fug_y~))izc Pcrl·cnt Passim! I 1/'.i-inch 100 518-iuch 50-XII I/cl-inch 30-50 L'S No. 40 _,-18 LIS No. :ou 7.5 ma~. % Fracture 75 1nin. Sand Equivalcn1 ..JO min. !"he rod base should be compacted to at leas! 95% basc>J on J\STM D-155 7 me1h,~!. Subgradc Reaction : For the ~lab subgrade so prepared. \\·C recommend a subgradc reaction modulus ol ~00 pot~nds per cubic inch (pci) for tht: design. !)ndcrslab Drain: Ba~ed on the surface topographic and suhsurfacc conditions, \\.e do not ~mticipate an~ subsurface tlo\\ at the subgradc level once the area is co\ercd with concrct~ slah. \Ve thus believe underslab drain i~ not necessary 4.7 SEISMIC CONSIDl·.RATIONS \Ve rec,11111nend tlrnl Site Class E as defined in the 2006 !BC be considered for the· seismic dc,i!Ln. lJas~d on our evaluations the seismic hazards at the site include liquefoctinn and latC'ral srread. rt1c-risk an: I iJ..cly most "e\erc from movement of Seattle Faull. The foult S) ~tcm i~ a 1..:nllcdh c term tl1r a sc:rits pf four or mor\.:' ('ast-\\Csl-trcnding.. smith-dipping faull strands underlying thc Sl."attlc area. The southernmost mapped strand ofth~ Seattle Fault is the closest known fault to the sitc. nus thrus1 tnull 1011i: is approximately :! t,J .J miles \\ ide ( north~south) and c,tends from the Kitsap Peninsula near 12 S&EE Brem('rtnn 1.111 th~ ,,c .... t tn the Sammam1~h Plati.:au ca."1 ,,f L.ih.i.: Samm~l.1111~h Pll the i..:a~l. I h...:-(our lault :-.tramb hm ,.: been intc.::rpl,iatL'd fni111 t'' l..'l"-\\ alcr g_c.!uph~ .,1..,;;:il ~ur, C)" ( Jt 1h1hn11. i.:t aL I 'Nl)) a11d i.:on-;~qucntl). the ~:-.act locatin11-; nn lnnd ha, l' yi.:t tn he det('Tm1111:d i.ll", ,.,·rilii.:(l. lh.'1..'i.:'111 g.:l1logil.'. 1..·\ iJcrKL' ~ugge~ts that llhl\ cment ,m this fault 1011~ octurrc<l about . ! 00 ~ t:ar~ ago. ~md the 1,::1rtlH.Jual..c II produi.:('d \\as on 1hc order l.'r a magnituJ~ 7.5. I iquefa\.'"tion is a condition ,,hen ,·ibratinn or '\haking nrthc ground results in the-f.')I.CC'.',,'°:' pore pn..:..:;:-iurc-.... in saturatt.:'d Si.lib and subsequent loss of strength. Lil1uefactinn can result in ghlt111d ..... cttkmc:nt or hc:1, ing.,t..:;and lx1ils. In general. soils,, hiL:11 ur1.; -susi..:cptibk.· ll1 li'-1udadi ... 111 inclu<lc saturated. ]O\"l<,C tll medium dcn~c sands ( i .c .. bekl\\ the \.'\/;:itcr table). Based on our e\·alual ion. 1hc ..:;;1nJ: soils ah(i\ (' a dcp1h ,if ~O frc1 arc liquefaction prone. Our a1u1lyse, indicaie that J to~ inc he:-. tll' total s.t:ttk·111c11l L":a11 (1ccur Juring. anti after earthquakes that i..:ausc a ground a(;i:ckration ,,f0.2:\:. Lateral !)prcad is a phenomenon \\hen lateral Ji~placl..'mcnt of surficial hlo<.:ks of soils result~ from liqucfa1,;tinn in a subsurface la)cr. Once liquefaction trnn~forms the subsurfaC\.' la:cr int ... 1 a tluidi1cd mas..;. gravity plus inertial for1.:es that re~ult from tht: earthquake cause the mass to 111 ... ,,c do\\n~slopc tm1tards a ('tit sliJpc l)I" free face: (sud1 a~ a river ch~1n11cl or J canal). Using a prc~umcd ca11hquak~ gcni:rated by Seattle Fault and an analytical approach developed h) Jonathan 13ra) f ",\'imp///lt'd St•ismic Slope Displaccmem Procedure\". l" !weruutimwl ( 'm?/el't!IICt' 011 1:·,,nh,1w .. 1ke Gi10IL'clmicul l:.'11:,z.iueering :!007). our evaluations inJicate th~1t lhc lateral spread nHt) c:-iu~..: 1' fc..:t of lateral (\\t~l\\an.H movement and 6 inches of ground scttk·mcnl. l'hc most l'ITcctivc mitigations to these scismii.:: ha.tards include ground imprcwement and piling. I IO\\CH.'r. due lo the lig.ht~\\cight nature of the proposed structure \\"C hclicvc tlrnt the seismic hazards can he mitigated to a rcasonahle risk level by connecting the spread footings by grad\.' beams ... ,r n.•i11lorc1:d slab. \Ve helit:,c that this ~):-:.tern '"ill greatly reduct.:'d the chance of total stmcturc collap~c. J\ S&EE U ADDITIO'sAL SERVICl:S ,\dditinn:11 sen i...:cs ,, ill he requin:d during The t:nn"itruction nftht: project. 'Ne \..'ll\ isi1.m that llu.•-;c,: aJJitional scn,kcs ma~ include tile fr11lowing: ~v1onitorin!!, ot· site subgrade prcpJratio1l and cumpa..:tion. M(lnitoring oftempornry exca,mion and ~horing installation. Monit0ring tlf suhgrade preparation tl,r u11d.:rgrou1H.l utilities 4. Obscnation of fr)oting ~uhgradc. (hir rcprc~cntali\'~ "Ill confi,111 thl' bearing cap:.u.:ity and rro\idc rt'Cl)1H111t:ndation reg.an.Jing. O\'er~cxcavatillll. if nccdctl. 5. Monitnring or placement and cc,mpaction of strucrurnl fill. Our rcprcscnt;tti\c \\ ill confirm 1h~ ~uitabilit) of the fill materials. pcrfonn til'ld density tcsb. and as~ist the contractor in met!ting, thl' compaction r~quircmcnt~ 6. Other geotechnical issues deemed necessary. 5.0 CLOSURE Th~ recommendations presented in this report are provided for design purpo!'.es and are ha~ed on soil conditions JisdoseJ b) subsurface explorations. Subsurfai.::e informa1iL11t presented herein lk1c~ not constitutC' a direct or implied \\·arrnnty that the soil conditions het,\,ecn e"-ploration locations can be dir~clly interpolated or extrapolated or that subsurface 1:on<litions anJ soil ,ariations different from tlll1sc disclosed hy the C:\.pl0rations will 1101 he re\calcd. The rccommcnda1ions ou1lincd in this rcpnt1 ar~ bas~d un the as-.rnnption that lhc de\elupmcnt plan i"' ..::ons.istent \\ith the <lt!scription pro,·it..icd in this. report. If the Jevt!lopmt:nt plan is changed or suhsurfac:1;" conditions difle"rcnt from those di~loscd b~ tl1e expll,ral ion arc vb~cned Juring construction. we should be advised at once so that \H~ can re\ it'\\ the~ c\1ndirions. and if neccssar~. reconsider our dcs:ig.n recommendations. XO~-I rp1 I~ S&EE Puget Sound -Renton North 8th and Park Avenue North, Renton. WA 98055 (For rnarlrng -see Company addresses) --~-----~•• ____ c--·---s, ------, -··--· i "'-/ ·/encJOr!ruch?J'l'S I M---f:ence ·"!~:. I D Ncn-8ceirg C:'e,: I D General c,a~•.1q [] 'ies~r1ctea car~ rg ~ i 1 \ I I ~:.'.:,'0"' "' 0 ~--~~~~~s;:,~~~~~~~.:-~~~::::::::::~s,,,2-_-_-_-_-'"'~_.._-.;_-_-_-_~r--_~'"'-::_=----r ' 54. =-:. __ L s, --:_ -:::r. Stonehenge Office Pl FIGURE 1 •; I ,, •, ,, : ' / / / ' I N w a::: ::, (!) u:: ... < Surcharge Load = q (psf) ·---1-·---- .... J S&EE Joh no lW2-l H (ft) Base of Excavation ',,yA, (Ignore resistance· at top 2 feet) I 2· D(ft) ,/ / '<----· General Notes: 115 D 1. All pressures in pounds per square feet (psi) h I \ 1~--\ ' \ i---·\ I ' ~-----~\ I I, 4 ft 62 (H-2) (Hydrostatic Pressure) + + 1 0 27q 32 (H+D) (Lateral Earth Pressures) 2. Passive earth pressure includes a safety factor of 1 5 3. Minimum embedment D = 1.5 H 4. Frictional resistance along sheet pile wall can be estimated using a coefflc1ent of friction = O 3 5. Surcharge loads, q, may result from construction equipment and weight of concrete slab. l·i~urc 3 Shoring Dt:~ign Crikria Cantilewr She~t Pile Wall 0 ,._ -,--0.m!o.1 -.... ~ t---. I ', r-, -.... -~ r-,...., ' ,, ' m = o.5 "'2.!,\ / 1, 0.2 m ,0.1---L,>-, j), ~ , m =0.3/ :,: ;:. " C u. 0.6 0 "' 3 ~ 0.8 .A ~" ~ ~I jlf'/f I, / I , jLf I/ .e .4 .6 .8 VALUE OF crH ( ~) LINE LOAD QL FOR m i_ 0.4• CTH( H )·___Q,__ZQn__ -Oi: " 1o.i6+n2)2 pH, 0.55QL FOR m >0.4, a; 1 H ), 1.2sm2n R H 'tli: (m2 t-n2)2 {JRESULTANT PH' 0.~4 0L (ffl +I) m 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 PRESSURES FROM LINE LOAD QL (BOUSSINESQ EQUATION MODIFIED BY EXPERIMENT) Refer•nce: Foundations .and Earth Structures, Design Manual 7.2, Department of lhe Navy. May 1982 R .60H .60H .56H .48H IO 0 02 OB H ~ ~ ' -r-,:: ~ i:--~ ' r-m,0.6 \\ ', \ m=O.z--z ~I .,. ;;, I / ~~=0.4 J • I V I (/ m ~ R J 0.2 .78 .59H 0.4 .78 .59H ft :, 0.6 .45 .48H p .5 1.0 1.5 H2 VALUE OF ""H (~) FOR m!,0.4, H2 0.28n2 "H(Op)' (Q16t-n2)3 FOR m >0.4• SECTION A-A PRESSURES FROM POINT LOAD Qp (BOUSSINESQ EQUATION MODIFIED BY EXPERIMENT) Calculation of Surcharge Loads on Subsurface Walls L-------------------------:-! Figure 4 ,\Pl'FNIJI.\ ;\ LO(;s OF PRLVIOl.iS BORIN(;, 8(1~. I 1p1 S&EE ., ..... l:!• J .. I ~ 1 °'· ~-.... J J "' \ \..8 .... ~-<i• ,.,. ~-~-~-! "' l (}' ~1 ! l ... 0 ... J .. 11• ... ~- I i. l ,,,. :-:• STANDARD STREAM STUDY NARRATIVE AND HABITAT DATA REPORT Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton, Washington Prepared for: The Boeing Company Renton, Washington Prepared by: Amee Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 3500 188th Street SW, Suite 601 Lynnwood, Washington 98037 (425) 921-4000 September 2015 Project No. L Y15160360 .. ,. i amec · · foster wheeler ~ amec ~•~ foster · wheeler TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................... .. ·············································· ............ 1 2.0 STANDARD STREAM STUDY NARRATIVE....................................................... . .... 3 2.1 STREAM CLASSIFICATION............. .. ......................................................... 3 2.2 VEGETATIVE COVER................... .. ........................................................... 3 2.3 ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION....... . ............................................ 4 2.4 FISH AND WILDLIFE......................... . ................................... 5 2.4.1 Mammals .. .............. ........... .. ............................................. 5 2.4.2 Birds................................... . ...................... 5 2.4.3 Amphibians and Reptiles ...................................................................... 6 2.4.4 Fish .......... ................................. . ............................................ 6 2.5 MEASURES TO PROTECT TREES AND VEGETATION...... .. .............................. 8 2.6 NO NET LOSS OF ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION... .. ................................. 8 3.0 HABITAT DATA REPORT........................... .. ................................ 9 3.1 HABITAT DIVERSITY.......................... . ................................. 9 3.2 MIGRATION CORRIDORS.......................................... . .................. 10 3.3 SPECIES AND COVER TYPES......................... . ................. 10 3.4 IDENTIFICATION OF DISTURBED AREAS...................... . ... 11 3.5 EXISTING HABITAT VALUES AND FUNCTIONS ....................................................... 11 3.5.1 Temperature .. ............................................... ........ .. ..... 12 3.5.2 Water Quality ....................................................................................... 12 3.5.3 Reach Sinuosity.................................................... .. .. 12 3.5.4 Vegetative Conditions........................................................ .. .... 13 3.5.5 Floodplain Condition ...................................... ............ ......... .. .... 13 3.5.6 Habitat Values and Functions at the Project Site ................................ 13 3.6 HABITAT ALTERATIONS AND IMPACTS AND PROPOSED HABITAT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ................................................................................... 13 4.0 REFERENCES ....... ..................................................................................... 15 TABLES Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Small Mammals Reported to Occur Along the Lower Cedar River Birds Reported to Occur Along the Lower Cedar River Non-Native Fish Species Introduced into the Lake Washington/Lake Union System Table 4 Different Aquatic Life Uses and Their Associated Numeric Temperature Criteria Amee Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 p \boeing renton\Jy15160360 apron d permilling\reports\apron d ulilities\apron_d_streamstudyhabl1atrp\_092915.docx ~ amec7 foster wheeler Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Vicinity Map Apron D Site Plan Apron D Utility Plan Appendix A Photographic Log Amee Foster Wheeler TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) FIGURES APPENDIX Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton~y15160360 apron d permit11ng\reports\apron d u~llt1es\apron_d_streamstudyhabitatrpt_092915.docx STANDARD STREAM STUDY NARRATIVE AND HABITAT DATA REPORT Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton, Washington 1.0 INTRODUCTION ~ amec •t"' foster wheeler The Boeing Company (Boeing) is replacing existing electrical and mechanical utilities at its Apron D Flightline. The utilities being replaced are electrical power and an existing duct bank, compressed air lines, domestic water, and fire protection water, including fire hydrants. The blast fence is being relocated to allow a longer airplane (the 737-900) to fit into the existing stall at D10. Boeing is relocating an existing blast fence 15 feet south which would be 5 feet from an adjacent property line. The proposed project is located at: 737 Logan Avenue North Renton, Washington 98055 Main Boeing Renton Manufacturing Plant Parcel number 0723059001 Approximately 117,150 square feet of the project is located within the shoreline zone (Figures 1 and 2). The contractor will maintain a job trailer at or near the construction site. Below is a list of the areas and lineal feet of utilities that are being replaced within the shoreline zone (Figure 3): Impermeable Surface -8,500 square feet of concrete pavement replacement -19,600 square feet of asphalt pavement replacement Utilities -1,000 lineal feet of 4-inch domestic water line -980 lineal feet of 10-inch fire water line -1,000 lineal feet of 4-inch air line -1,500 lineal feet of electrical duct bank -Installation of 5 fire hydrants • Blast Fence Relocation -Approximately 70 lineal feet of 10-foot-high blast wall -Approximately 600 SF of foundation Amee Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 p:"\boemg ren\on1Jy15160360 apron d perm1tting\reports\apron d ut11ities\apron_d_streamstudyhabitatrpt_092915.docx q~ amec? foster wheeler The anticipated dates of work are from December 20, 2015 through November 20, 2016. The work will be completed in phases to maintain the existing utilities for aircraft production. There are no proposed off-site improvements or land dedications as part of this project. Boeing will employ best management practices (BMPs) to prevent runoff and debris from entering the Cedar River. Any soil stockpiled for this work will be covered with tarps and surrounded by silt fences until the soil can be removed or placed back in the excavated area. In addition, Boeing will submit an erosion control plan to the City of Renton for approval. The proposed project will occur on developed property consisting of paved, impermeable surfaces and will not result in the creation of additional impermeable surface area. In addition, there will be no trees or plantings removed or disturbed as part of this project. No construction activities will occur and no structures will be placed below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the lower Cedar River (LCR). This report provides a description of the environmental and habitat attributes of the project site where the proposed project is to occur, as defined by RMC 4-8-120C. Sections 2.0 and 3.0 present the requisite information for the Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report, respectively. Amee Foster Wheeler 2 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boemg renton\Jy15160360 apron d perm1tt1nglreportslapron d utilities\apron_d_streamstudyflab1tatrpt_092915.docx 2.0 STANDARD STREAM STUDY NARRATIVE ~ amec •~T foster ' wheeler This section presents the standard stream study narrative, providing information about existing habitat conditions and functions of the LCR adjacent to the proposed project site. 2.1 STREAM CLASSIFICATION According to RMC 4-3-050Q4 (City of Renton Water Class Map), the LCR in the vicinity of the project site is a Class 1 water. 2.2 VEGETATIVE COVER An Amee Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (Amee Foster Wheeler) biologist, Bob Stuart, conducted site surveys on May 12, 2015, May 14, 2014, and November 24, 2014 to assess habitat conditions and vegetative cover along the LCR shoreline adjacent to and within 100 feet of the project site. The project site is defined as those portions of Apron D within the 200-foot shoreline zone adjacent to the LCR. Apron D is currently used by Boeing to support their 737 manufacturing program. The Boeing facility on the east shoreline of the LCR and the Renton Municipal Airport on the west shoreline of the LCR consist primarily of concrete and asphalt surfaces. A vegetation survey was conducted along the east and west banks of the LCR adjacent to and extending 100 feet upstream and downstream of the project site (Figure 2). Appendix A provides a photographic log depicting habitat conditions and vegetation along the riparian zone of the east and west banks of the LCR adjacent to the project site. The riparian zone along the west bank of the LCR south of and within 100 feet of the project site is narrow (6 to 12 feet wide). abutting an 8-foot-high concrete flood-control wall (Appendix A, Photos 1, 2, 4, and 9). Riparian vegetation at the time of the visits was very sparse and was limited primarily to patches of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum), horsetail (Equisetum fluviatile), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), and alder (A/nus rubra) (Appendix A, Photos 5 through 9). Reed canarygrass, Japanese knotweed, and Himalayan blackberry are listed as noxious weeds by King County. The width of the riparian area is limited by the concrete flood-control wall (Appendix A, Photos 1 and 2). No trees with trunks greater than or equal to 10 inches in diameter at breast-height (DBH) are located within 100 feet of south of the project site on the west bank. The west bank of the LCR within 100 feet north of the project site is more heavily vegetated than that south of the project site (Appendix A, Photos 10 through 12). Vegetation on the west bank of the LCR within 100 feet north of the project site consists of alder, unidentified species of willow ( Sa/ix spp.), Amee Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 3 p:\boe1ng renton~y15160360 apron d permitt1ng\reports\apron d ut11itieslapron_d_streamstudyhabitatrpt_092915.docx amec. foster wheeler reed canarygrass, Japanese knotweed, and Himalayan blackberry, as well as an unidentified species of evergreen tree. No trees with trunks greater than or equal to 10 inches DBH are located within 100 feet north of the project site on the west bank. Within 100 feet south of the project site, the east bank of the LCR is more heavily vegetated than the west bank (Appendix A, Photo 13). Riparian vegetation on the east bank south of the project site is similar to that located on the west bank north of the project site, with the exception that the riparian corridor is not confined by a flood-control wall. The Cedar River Trail Park, maintained by the City of Renton, is located along the east bank of the LCR and consists of manicured lawns, ornamental shrubs, and native vegetation (Appendix A, Photo 15). An 8-foot-wide asphalt pedestrian path is located in the Cedar River Trail Park, within 60 feet of the LCR. The Boeing plant is located within 75 feet of the LCR (Figures 1 and 2). No trees with trunks greater than or equal to 10 inches DBH are located within 100 feet south of the project site on the east bank. The vegetation on the east bank of the LCR within 100 feet north of the project site is similar to that south of the project site (Appendix A, Photos 14 through 18). The Cedar River Trail Park extends along the east shore of the LCR north to the Boeing property near the mouth of the LCR and consists of manicured lawns, ornamental shrubs, native vegetation, and an asphalt pedestrian path (Appendix A, Photo 15). No trees with trunks greater than or equal to 10 inches DBH are located within 100 feet north of the project site on the east bank. 2.3 ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION Riparian habitats have important ecological functions other than providing habitat for birds and other wildlife. Healthy riparian vegetation protects banks from erosion, influences in-channel aquatic habitats, maintains favorable water temperature for fish through shading, filters runoff, and provides nutrients. Riparian vegetation creates meanders, increases habitat complexity, and can protect against scour during severe storm events. Riparian habitats link upland and aquatic habitats. Upland habitats have a critical role in watershed function and affect riparian and aquatic habitats, particularly in drier, low-elevation sites. The riparian zone along the east and west banks of the LCR within 100 feet of the project site is sparsely vegetated and includes a number of invasive species, as discussed in Section 2.2, above. The primary ecological functions provided by riparian vegetation along the east and west banks of the LCR within 100 feet of the project site include: • Nesting and foraging habitat for birds and small mammals, • Input of terrestrial insects from overhanging vegetation, Amee Foster Wheeler 4 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\Jy15160360 apron d permitting\reports\apron d utilit1es\apron_d_streamstudyhab1tatrpt_092915.docx Input of allochthonous organic matter (via leaf fall), Limited erosion control, and Limited habitat complexity. J amec , foster · wheeler ' The LCR is a manmade channel created in 1912 when the river was diverted as a tributary to the former Black River directly to Lake Washington. The LCR is channelized and substantially altered, so that there is very limited riparian area to provide all of the potential ecological functions of an unaltered habitat Riparian vegetation provides very little, if any, shading to the LCR because of the dominance of small shrubs and the lack of large trees. Both banks of the river in the project area are contained within levees and/or flood-control walls, so there is no potential for the creation of meanders or off-channel habitat Because of extensive development along both banks of the river in the project area (Boeing to the east and west and the Renton Municipal Airport to the west), there is little, if any, transition between riparian and upland habitats. 2.4 FISH AND WILDLIFE This section addresses fish and wildlife species that may use the LCR in the vicinity of the project site. 2.4.1 Mammals No mammals or signs of mammal use were observed during the site visits. Given the level of development in the project area, it is likely that only small mammals such as squirrels, mice, rats, voles, moles, raccoons, opossums, muskrats, and river otters use the riparian areas along the LCR shoreline within 100 feet of the project area. Richter and Azous (1997), conducting small-mammal surveys in a wetland along the LCR, reported 13 species of mammals (Table 1). These, as well as other small mammals common to the Puget lowlands, may occur along the LCR adjacent to the project site. 2.4.2 Birds Several bird species were observed during the site visits, including American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), American robin (Turdus migratorius), Canada goose (Bran/a canadensis), and European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Richter and Azous (1997) conducted bird surveys in a wetland of the LCR between late May and mid-June in 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, and 1995 to determine distribution and relative abundance. They reported 58 species of birds (Table 2). It is likely that these, as well as other species of birds common to the Puget lowlands, nest or forage in the project vicinity. Amee Foster Wheeler Project No. L Y15160360 5 p:lboeing renton\Jy15160360 apron d permrtting\reports\apron d utihtres\apron_d_streamstud0)ab1tatrpt_092915.docx 1-amec J& foster wheeler 2.4.3 Amphibians and Reptiles No amphibians or reptiles were observed during the site visits; however, it is likely that amphibian (e.g., Anurans) and reptile species (e.g., turtles) found in the Lake Washington basin may use the areas within the site vicinity. Richter and Azous (1997) reported the occurrence of six amphibian species in the LCR: • Ensatina (salamander) (Ensatina eschscholtzii), • Long-toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylus), • Northwestern salamander (A. gracile), Pacific tree frog (Pseudoacris regilla), Red-legged frog (Rana aurora), and • Western red-backed salamander (Plethodon vehiculum). No information was located listing reptile species occurring along the LCR in the project vicinity; however, reptiles listed for King County (King County, 2008) that could occur in the project vicinity include: Common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis), Northern alligator lizard (Elgaria coerulea), Northwestern garter snake (T. ordinoides), Painted turtle (Chrysemys picta), • Rubber boa (Charina bottae), • Slider (Trachemys scripta), • Western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), and • Western terrestrial garter snake (T. elegans). 2.4.4 Fish Small fish were observed jumping in the LCR adjacent to the project site during the site visits. Although they could not be identified, they appeared to be small salmonids. The Lake Washington system, including the LCR adjacent to the project site, hosts many fish species, including five salmonid species: Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho salmon (0. kisutch), sockeye/kokanee salmon (0. nerka), coastal cutthroat trout (0. c/arki clark1), and steelhead/rainbow trout ( 0. mykiss). Anadromous forms of each of these species use the Cedar River system as migratory, forage, nursery, and spawning habitat, so individuals are present in the river both as adults during migrations to spawning grounds and as juveniles (Kerwin, 2001 ). All of these species occur Amee Foster Wheeler 6 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renlon\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\apron d utilites\apron_d_streamstudyhabitatrpt_092915 docx. ~ amec ••-. foster ' wheeler seasonally in the LCR adjacent to the project site. Additionally, there have been isolated reports of coastal/Puget Sound bull trout ( Sa/velinus confluentus) occurring in the Lake Washington system; however, it is believed that few bull trout occur in the Lake Washington system, if they occur at all. Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Puget Sound steelhead trout, and bull trout are federally-listed species under the Endangered Species Act. Nonanadromous forms of winter steelhead (rainbow trout), sockeye (kokanee), and cutthroat trout may also occur in the LCR. Resident rainbow trout spend their entire life in the Lake Washington system. The resident rainbow trout population was sustained with hatchery plants because they rarely successfully reproduce in Water Resource Inventory Area 8; however, releases of hatchery rainbow trout have been all but eliminated. Nonanadromous coastal cutthroat trout also occur in the Lake Washington system and are much more abundant than the anadromous form. Kokanee salmon is the freshwater, resident form of 0. nerka. Some progeny from the parents of anadromous sockeye may also remain in Lake Washington for all or a portion of their lives (residenVanadromous sockeye) (Kerwin, 2001). The largest single population of adfluvial bull trout in western Washington is found above Cedar Falls in the upper Cedar River watershed. It is believed that a small number of bull trout pass through the reservoir and downstream hydroelectric facilities to the river reaches below Cedar Falls. However, it is apparently not sufficient to support the establishment of bull trout populations under the current ecological conditions (Corps, 2002). Native char, presumably bull trout, have been observed in the fish ladder viewing pool at the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks as recently as 1997, while isolated reports of native char being caught in or around Lake Washington occur every few years. A large juvenile char, again, presumably a bull trout (-250 millimeter, 3 years old), was caught in the LCR in July 1998. An adult char was also caught in the LCR in April of 1993 (Corps, 2002). Based on this information, occurrence of bull trout in the LCR adjacent to the project site is expected to be extremely limited, if they occur at all. Fish exclusion surveys conducted by Amee Foster Wheeler biologists in June 2013 and June 2014 as part of Boeing's North Bridge Replacement project on the LCR identified juvenile Chinook and coho salmon, as well as juvenile steel head/rainbow trout. Other fish species identified during these surveys included slimy sculpin (Cot/us asper), three-spined stickleback (Gaslerosteus aculeatus), and ammocoetes of an unidentified lamprey species (Petromyzontidae). Amee Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 7 p lboeing renton\Jy15160360 apron d permitting\reports\apron d utilrt1es\apron_d_streamstudyhab1iatrpt_092915.00C~ {~ amecT foster wheeler Species endemic to the Lake Washington system include the northern pike minnow (Ptychocheilus oregonensis), peamouth (Mylocheilus caurinus), sculpins (Coitus spp.), and longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) (Weitkamp et al., 2000; Wydoski and Whitney, 2003). Twenty-four non-native fish species (Table 3) have been identified in the Lake Washington/Lake Union system. A number of these species are now believed to be no longer present in the system. Some of these species are known to prey on juvenile salmon (e.g., smallmouth bass) while others are potential competitors with juvenile salmonids for food (Kerwin, 2001 ). 2.5 MEASURES TO PROTECT TREES AND VEGETATION The proposed project will not occur in areas with existing trees or riparian vegetation. No direct or indirect impacts to riparian vegetation or trees will occur as a result of the proposed project; therefore, no measures to protect vegetation or trees have been incorporated into the work plan. 2.6 No NET Loss OF ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION The project will result in no net loss of ecological function in the riparian zone of the LCR adjacent to and 100 feet upstream and downstream of the project site. As described above, the LCR adjacent to the project site provides limited ecological function due to low habitat diversity and complexity. Amee Foster Wheeler 8 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\Jy15160360 apron d permitting\reports\apron d util1ties\aproo_d_streamstuclyhabitatrpt_092915.docx ~ amec ~i.y foster wheeler 3.0 HABITAT DATA REPORT The habitat data report, as required by the City of Renton and described in RMC 4-8-120C, will provide pertinent habitat and ecological function information for the immediate project site where the proposed project is to occur. Sections 3.1 through 3.6 of the report will discuss following: The layers, diversity and variety of habitat found on the site; The location of any migration or movement corridors; The species typically associated with the cover types, including an identification of any critical wildlife species that might be expected to be found; Identification of any areas that have been previously disturbed or degraded by human activity or natural processes; A summary of existing habitat functions and values; and A summary of proposed habitat alterations and impacts and proposed habitat management program. 3.1 HABITAT DIVERSITY The LCR downstream of 1-405 (approximately 1.6 miles) is an artificial channel created early in the 20th century and is completely constrained between levees and revetments. This reach was regularly dredged to prevent flooding from the time of its completion in 1912 until the mid-1970s. Portions of the reach were again dredged in 1999 for the first time since the mid-1970s. Flood-control dredging is proposed during the summer of 2015. In-stream habitat in the reach is almost entirely glide, with little habitat complexity. Land uses prevent floodplain connectivity and have eliminated the potential for re-connection with a natural floodplain or the establishment of a riparian corridor. Channelization and existing land uses also prevent significant large woody debris (LWD) from accumulating in the channel. The reach is also very low-gradient and depositional, and the substrates have high levels of fine sediments (Corps, 2004; Parametrix and Adolfson, 2010). The shoreline along the LCR adjacent to the project site consists of developed property belonging to Boeing and the City of Renton. With realignment of the Cedar River into Lake Washington in 1912, the zone of sediment deposition was localized through the City of Renton (Perkins, 1994). The vast majority, if not all, of the non- suspendable sediment load is now deposited along this reach because Lake Washington lies at the river's mouth. With the path of the river fixed by armored banks, progressive infilling of the channel resulted. Sediment is continually deposited in the downstream 2 miles of the river and in an enlarging delta in Lake Washington. Amee Foster Wheeler Project No. L Y1 5160360 9 p:\008ing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitung\reports\apron d ut11ilieslapron_d_streamstudyhabitatrpt_092915.docx :l\t .. amec 8..,,, foster wheeler Aquatic habitat within the LCR adjacent to the project site consists of a low relief benthic habitat composed of small cobbles with some gravel and no boulders. LWD in the stretch of the LCR adjacent to the project site is extremely limited (Appendix A, Photo 1 ). River discharge at the time of the site visits in May and November 2014 was approximately 1,000 cubic feet per second and 320 cubic feet per second during the May 2015 visit (USGS, 2015). Channelization of the LCR has eliminated meanders within the lower river, such that the lower 1.6 miles of river consists of a uniform glide habitat with a nearly complete absence of riffles and pools. Habitat diversity along the LCR adjacent to the project site is extremely limited. 3.2 MIGRATION CORRIDORS A query of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitat and Species database (http://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/) identified five salmonid species that use the LCR as a migration corridor: Chinook salmon; Coho salmon; • Sockeye salmon; • Steelhead and rainbow trout; and • Coastal cutthroat trout. Two of the above species, Puget Sound Chinook salmon and Puget Sound steelhead trout, are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Bull trout, a member of the char family, may also be found in the LCR and is also listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Population status information and extent of use of this area is currently unknown. Adult and subadult size individuals have been observed infrequently in the LCR (below Cedar Falls), Lake Washington, and at the Locks. No spawning activity or juvenile rearing has been observed and no distinct spawning populations are known to exist in Lake Washington outside of the upper Cedar River above Lake Chester Morse (not accessible to bull trout within Lake Washington) (NOAA-Fisheries and USFWS, 2008). It is unlikely that bull trout use the Cedar River as a migratory corridor. 3.3 SPECIES AND COVER TYPES The almost complete absence of riparian vegetation along the west bank of the LCR and the limited riparian vegetation along the east bank adjacent to the project site and the highly developed shorelines along both banks of the LCR severely limit habitat availability and use by multiple plant and Amee Foster Wheeler 10 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d perm1tting\reports\apron d uttliUes\apron_d_streamstudytlabitatrpt_092915.docx ~ amec •'6T foster · wheeler animal species. The concrete flood-control wall on the west bank of the LCR adjacent to the project site severely limits the width of the riparian zone and eliminates the transition zone from riparian to terrestrial habitats. Typical plant and animal assemblages and associations that would be expected along the riparian corridor of the LCR are, for the most part, absent along the stretch adjacent to the project site. A query of the Washington Department of Natural Resources' Natural Heritage Program online database (http://www.dnr.wa.gov/ResearchScience/HowTo/ConservationRestoration/Pages/ amp_nh_data_order.aspx) did not identify any plant or terrestrial animal species of special concern in the vicinity of the project site. Critical wildlife species occurring at the project site include those salmonids identified in Section 2.4.4 above. 3.4 IDENTIFICATION OF DISTURBED AREAS The entire project area is highly developed and disturbed. As stated in Section 3.1, the lower 1.6 miles of the LCR is an artificially-created channel with extensive development along both banks. 3.5 EXISTING HABITAT VALUES AND FUNCTIONS The LCR adjacent to the project site has very limited habitat value and is low functioning. A combination of two habitat assessment methods was used to provide a qualitative assessment of the existing habitat values and functions. These habitat assessment methods were the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Wadeable Streams and Rivers (Barbour et al., 1999) and the U.S. Forest Service's Stream Inventory Handbook: Levels I and II (USFS, 2010). Both methods incorporate the use of physicochemical and biological parameters to assess habitat value and functionality. The EPA's Rapid Bioassessment Protocols incorporates both benthic invertebrate and fish assemblages' data in evaluating habitat value and function. For the purposes of this project, neither benthic invertebrate nor fish assemblage data were collected as part of the evaluation process due to the necessity of applying for and receiving the necessary permits to gather such data. The habitat assessment is based on physicochemical conditions observed at the project site: • Temperature, Water quality, • Reach sinuosity, Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitttng\reports\apron d utilitieslapron_d_streamstudyhabitatrpt_092915.docx Amee Foster Wheeler 11 1't amec 'A"' foster wheeler • Vegetative conditions of the stream banks and the riparian zone, and • Condition of the floodplain (e.g., accessibility from the bank. overflow. and size). Each of the above parameters is discussed below. 3.5.1 Temperature Mean monthly water temperatures in degrees Celsius in the LCR at Renton for the period of February 1992 through January 2015 (USGS, 2015) are as follows: • January -6.0 July -15.6 February -6.3 . August -15.9 . March -7.5 . September -13. 7 . April -9.4 . October -11.0 . May-11.5 November-8.1 June -13.2 December -6.3 The warmest water temperatures occur during the months of June, July, August, and September; however, even the highest mean monthly temperatures are compliant with Washington State aquatic life temperature criteria (Table 4), with the exception of the char spawning and rearing beneficial use. Char (e.g., bull trout) do not spawn in the LCR and it is highly unlikely that they use the LCR as rearing habitat. 3.5.2 Water Quality No site-specific water quality data were found for the project site; however, water quality monitoring has been conducted in south Lake Washington by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Washington State's Water Quality Assessment (303[d] & 305[b] Report) (Ecology, 2008) identified exceedances of water quality standards for temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and fecal coliforms in the LCR. No chemical exceedances of state water quality criteria were identified for the LCR adjacent to the project site. 3.5.3 Reach Sinuosity As discussed above, the lower 1.6 miles of the LCR are channelized and much of the shoreline on both banks is restrained by bulkheads. There is no sinuosity within the entire 1.6 miles of the LCR. Stream sinuosity can provide increased habitat complexity through the creation of pools. riffles. and glides. as well as the creation of off-channel habitat. Amee Foster Wheeler 12 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\apron d ulil1t1es\apron_d_streamstudyt,ab1tatrpt_092915 doo: ~ amec•• / __ 3.5.4 Vegetative Conditions foster wheeler As described previously, riparian vegetation is sparse along the both banks of the LCR within 100 feet of the project site. As such, habitat diversity and functionality along this reach of the LCR is severely limited. 3.5.5 Floodplain Condition The LCR is an artificially-created channel confined by levees and bulkheads on each bank. Except in extreme discharge conditions, the LCR has very little connectivity with its floodplain and virtually no potential for formation of off-channel habitat within the floodplain. Because of the low gradient of the LCR, it functions as a sediment depositional zone. The City of Renton and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers periodically dredges the LCR for flood-control purposes. The City of Renton is proposing flood-control dredging for the summer of 2016. 3.5.6 Habitat Values and Functions at the Project Site A qualitative assessment of the LCR adjacent to the project site indicates that it provides very low habitat value and function due primarily to the sparse riparian vegetation and habitat complexity. 3.6 HABITAT ALTERATIONS AND IMPACTS AND PROPOSED HABITAT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The project will not involve any in-water components or work below the OHWM. no portion of the project occur in the riparian zone of the LCR, and no external lighting will be installed as part of the proposed project. No components of the proposed project occurring in the 200-foot shoreline zone will affect existing habitat or ecological conditions within the 200-foot shoreline zone or within the adjacent LCR. No habitat management or mitigation programs are required for the proposed project and none are proposed. Amee Foster Wheeler Project No. LY15160360 13 p:\boeing renton~y15160360 apron d permittinglreports\apron d util,ties\apron_d_strearnstudyhabitatrpt_092915.docx 114 amec fb. foster wheeler (This page intentionally left blank) Amee Foster Wheeler 14 Project No. LY15160360 p \boeing renton\Jy15160360 apron d perm1tt1ng\reports\apron d uttti~es\apron_d_streamsludytiabitalrpt_092915 docx ~ amec •1t.~ foster ' wheeler 4.0 REFERENCES Barbour, M.T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B.C., and Stribling, J.B. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA 841-B-99-002, Washington, D.C. Corps -see U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Kerwin, J. 2001. Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the Cedar-Sammamish Basin (Water Resource Inventory Area 8). Washington Conservation Commission, Olympia. King County. 2008. King County Biodiversity Report 2008. King County, Seattle, Washington, http://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/animalsAndPlants/biodiversity/king-county- biodiversity-report.aspx (accessed September 1, 2009). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (NOAA-Fisheries and USFWS). 2008. Endangered Species Act - Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation. The 1-405 Tukwila to Renton Improvement Project (1-5 to SR 169-Phase 2) Lower Cedar River, Cedar River Sixth Field HUC: 171100120106, 171100120302, King County, Washington. NOAA-Fisheries and USFWS, Lacey, Washington, https://pcts.nmfs.noaa.gov/pls/pcts-pub/sxn7.pcts_ upload .download?p _file=F 13441 /200704219 _ 405 _trip_ 03-03-2008.pdf ( accessed May 19, 2012). Parametrix and Adolfson Associates, Inc. (Parametrix and Adolfson). 2010. City of Renton Shoreline Master Program Update Restoration Plan. Prepared for the City of Renton, Washington, http://rentonwa.gov/uploadedFiles/Business/EDNSP/planning/ 4.3%20Final%20Restoration%20Plan%200une-10).pdf?n=2474 (accessed April 13, 2012). Perkins, S.J. 1994. The shrinking Cedar River -Channel changes following flow regime regulation and bank armoring, in Proceedings of Effects of Human-Induced Changes on Hydrologic Systems. American Water Resources Association 1994 Annual Summer Symposium, p. 649-658. Richter, K.O., and Azous, A.L. 1997. Amphibian distribution, abundance, and habitat use, in Azous, AL, and Horner, R.R. (eds.), Wetlands and Urbanization -Implications for the Future, final report. Puget Sound Wetlands and Stormwater Management Research Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Seattle, Washington, and University of Washington, Seattle, http://your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/ I ibrary/a rch ive-docume nts/wlr/wetla nds-urban ization-report/wet-rept. pdf ( accessed September 1, 2009). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). 2002. Montlake Cut Slope Stabilization Project Environmental Assessment Biological Evaluation -Lake Washington Ship Canal, Seattle, Washington. Corps, Seattle District, Seattle, Washington. Amee Foster Wheeler Project No. L Y15160360 15 p:\boeing renton~y15160360 apron d perm1ttinglreports\apron d ut1libes\apron_d_streamstudyhab1tatrpt_092915.docx :lit amec 'e"'!' foster wheeler --. 2004. Cedar River at Renton Flood Damage Reduction Operation and Maintenance Manual - Cedar River Section 205 (Renton, Washington). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Seattle, Washington. U.S. Forest Service (USFS). 2010. Stream Inventory Handbook: Levels I and II (Version 2.10). USFS, Pacific Northwest Region, Region 6, Portland, Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2015. USGS Surface-Water Monthly Statistics for Washington - USGS 12119000 Cedar River at Renton. Department of the Interior, USGS, National Water Information System, http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/wa/nwis/monthly/ ?site_no=12119000&por_ 12119000_ 18=1179603,00010, 18, 1992-02,2015-01&start_dt=1992- 02&end_dt=2015-01&format=html_table&date_format=YYYY-MM- DD&rdb _ compression=file&submitted_form=parameter _ selection _list (accessed May 18, 2015). Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). 2008. Washington State's 2008 Water Quality Assessment (303[d] & 305[b] Report). Ecology, Olympia, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/ wq/303d/2008/index.html (accessed April 15, 2012). Weitkamp, D.E., Ruggerone, G.T., Sacha, L., Howell, J., and Bachen, B. 2000. Factors Affecting Chinook Populations -Background Report. City of Seattle, Seattle, Washington. Wydoski, R.S., and Whitney, R.R. 2003. Inland Fishes of Washington. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, and University of Washington Press, Seattle. Amee Foster Wheeler 16 Project No. LY15160360 p:\boemg rentonlly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\apron d ulilities\apron_d_streamstudyhabitatrpt_092915.docx ~ amec •1T foster ' wheeler TABLES TABLE 1 ~ amec ••""' foster ' wheeler SMALL MAMMALS REPORTED TO OCCUR ALONG THE LOWER CEDAR RIVER' Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton, Washington Species Common Name and Scientific Name (Genus species Creeping vole Micro/us oregoni Deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus Ermine Mustela ermine Forest deer mouse Peromyscus oreas Long-tailed vole Micro/us /ongicaudus Marsh shrew Sorex bendirei Masked shrew Sorex cinereus Note(s\ 1. Source: Richter and Azous, 1997. p·\boe1ngrenton~y15160360aprondperm1tt1ng\reports\aprond ut111~es\tables\tables_apron_d_092915.docx Montane shrew Shrew-mole Southern red-backed vole Townsend's chipmunk Trowbridge's shrew Vagrant shrew Sorex monticolus Neurotrichus gibbsii C/ethryonomys gapperi Tamias townsendii Sorex trowbridgei Sorex vagrans Amee Foster Wheeler Page 1 ·~ amec ~~ foster wheeler TABLE 2 BIRDS REPORTED TO OCCUR ALONG THE LOWER CEDAR RIVER1 Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton, Washington Species Common Name and Scientific Name !Genus soecies' American crow Co,vus brachyrh ynchos Northern pygmy owl Glaucidium gnoma American goldfinch Carduelis tristis Orange-crowned warbler Vermivora ce/ata American robin Turdus migratorius Pine siskin Carduelis pinus Black-capped chickadee Parus atricapillus Pacific-slope flycatcher Empidonax difflcilis Belted kingfisher Ceryle alcyon Purple finch Carpodacus purpureus Bewick's wren Thryomanes be wickii Red-breasted nuthatch Sit/a Canadensis Brown-headed cow bird Molothrus ater Red-breasted sapsucker Sphyrapicus ruber Black-headed grosbeak Pheucticus Red crossbill Loxia cu,virostra melanoceohalus Brewer's blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus Red-eyed vireo Vireo olivaceus Brown creeper Cerlhia Americana Rufous-sided towhee Pipilo erythrophtha/mus Black-throated gray Dendroica nigrescens Ruffed grouse Bonasa umbel/us warbler Bushtit Psaltriparus minimus Ruby-crowned kinglet Regulus calendu/a Chestnut-backed Parus rufescens Red-winged blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus chickadee Cedar waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum Sora Porzana Carolina Cooper's hawk Accipiter cooperii Song sparrow Melospiza melodia Common raven Co,vus corax Sharp-shinned hawk Accipiter striatus Common yellow throat Geothlypis trichas Steller's jay Cyanocitta stelleri Dark-eyed junco Junco hyemalis Swainson's thrush Catharus ustulatus Downy woodpecker Picoides pubescens Townsend's warbler Setophaga townsendi European starling Sturnus vu/garis Vaux's swift Chaetura vauxi Evening grosbeak Coccothraustes Violet-green swallow Tachycineta tha/assina vesoerlinus Fox sparrow Passerella iliaca Virginia rail Rallus /imicola Great blue heron Ardea herodias Warbling vireo Vireo gi/vus Golden-crowned kinglet Regulus satrapa Western tanager Piranga ludoviciana Hairy woodpecker Picoides villosus Willow flycatcher Empidonax trail/ii Hermit thrush Catharus gutta/us Wilson's warbler Cardellina pusilla Marsh wren Cistothorus palustris Winter wren Troglodytes hiemalis MacGillivray's warbler Geothlypis tolmiei Wood duck Aix sponsa Northern flicker Colaptes auratus Yellow warbler Dendroica petechia Note(s) 1. Source: Richter and Azous, 1997. Amee Foster Wheeler Page 2 p·lboeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitting\reports\apron d utilihes\tablesllables_apron_d_092915.docx TABLE3 ~ amec i•"" foster wheeler NON-NATIVE FISH SPECIES INTRODUCED INTO THE LAKE WASHINGTON/LAKE UNION SYSTEM' Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Common Name American shad Atlantic salmon Black bullhead Black crappie Bluegill Brook trout Brown bullhead Brown trout Channel catfish Cherry salmon Common carp Fathead minnow Goldfish Grass carp Lake trout Lake whitefish Largemouth bass Pumpkinseed sunfish Smallmouth bass Tench Warmouth Weather loach White crappie Yellow perch Note(s) 1. Source: Kerwin, 2001. p:\boe1ng renion\Jy15160360 apron d permiWng\reports\apron d ublitiesltables\lables_apron_d_092915.docx Renton, Washington Scientific Name Alosa sapidissima Sa/mo salar lctalurus me/as Pomoxis nigromaculatus Lepomis macrocheilus Salvelinus fontinalis lctalurus nebu/osus Sa/mo trutta lctalurus punctatus Oncorhynchus masou Cyprinus carpio Pimephales notatus Carassius auratus Ctenopharengodon idel/a Salvelinus namaycush Coregonus clupeaformis Micropterus sa/moides Lepomis gibbosus Micropterus dolomieui Tinca tinca Lepomis gulosus Misgumus angillicaudatus Pomoxis annularis Perea flavescens Status Uncommon strays Can exceed 1,000 per year Extinct Common Common Rarely caught Rare, may be extinct No observed reproduction Rarely caught Extinct Abundant Unknown Intermittent Triploids only Extinct Extinct Common Abundant Common Abundant No observed reproduction No observed reproduction Uncommon Abundant Amee Foster Wheeler Page 3 ~ amec ~..,,,, foster wheeler TABLE4 DIFFERENT AQUATIC LIFE USES AND THEIR ASSOCIATED NUMERIC TEMPERATURE CRITERIA' Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton, Washington Beneficial Use Temoerature' 1°Cl Char Spawning and Rearing 12 Core Summer Salmonid Habitat 16 Salmonid Spawning, Rearing, and Migration 17.5 Salmonid Rearing and Migration only 17.5 Note{s) 1. Source: Ecology, 2008. 2. Based on the 7-day average of the daily maximum temperatures. Abbreviation{s) •c = degrees Celsius Amee Foster Wheeler Page 4 p:\boeingrenton\ly15160360aprondpermittinglreports\aprond ut11itiesltables\tables_apron_d_092915docx ~ amec ~t..'9 foster wheeler FIGURES ',\ \\ ,, VICINITY MAP Boeing Apron D Utility u . Rent W . pgrade ProJect on, ashmgton By: CJW Date 09/28/15 Project# LY15160360 AREA MAP amec foster wheeler ,... Figure 1 --L' 'i--- I )=·-~ '··--=----~-~ - +.! . \~-~..,..::---J1_1 _Q _ -. -·-·-·-'\:;;;:,-·-·-~ \.,w; . ---~ =~ \,...,.{>" 5-112 1"-1o:<-u1C 5-1.5 lllDC ~ me_,_ M._..-, .._..... :1o'srl'\ ~~ ~J [I~ f,-;.:t~ (11·uti G.3 =.:.~-~-~-----,,,,----- ,~-: l)10 W1o10< ~-,.3+~ """ Tll -::1-IJ ~.r!~ ·- ~TOOL u-... (~<111") r·~· r'"'"-' -~ ~;-1~~ ~ ~-"""'--"' __.,,.. lt~~~ o :1 f --·-05 ~ :ii BUX: ~,;.!~- ·=--=---"==-!! \-·- // /~ 2~~11.!·\~:r' ;,S )(.:"'..® ~,! . .,' < <. 1_U.{'.JCl ~~jli) • •r•,.v.ro S<•nr ~.,.,.,~, =c<••••-••·•, .. ·,m =-=i ·-·· ''""' .. ,. ITJ • ..;uLLl --m•R,-·•cs., ·-·-··~'"·'·""'".'"'' ~---· Bux: (~~.-;?, . ----.. -·- "" --i -------.-~-~~r·-1 ,:, rt ~~~-'ii! 'I ~.-i:, ill'-.~ • ,. APRON D SITE PLAN Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton, Washington By: cjw I Date 09/28115 Proieci # LY15160360 amec foster wheeler :,..~ Figure 2 c_ -=:-: / ~ ----=-::::::::i ,-~-- \ C{[IAR J!f'IER C \ . --.-' ..:;;----=-,/,>-. - --3 ~~~--~-~-~, ... ;:....~~ ~~it.l.l~t:R /8. :~ ~ .!i._c;;::ND 1i:lio=m1 --·-:J.. l cm Cf RENTOM /f·-, ATILEllC FlELDS ,~ I -/.. I ' ~-. --- o, ~c;__/ r-BWG , ..... .- h, r~ ~~i i ('1"'Jlll l>-c,_,, .-... -- " _ _1;111" _ _.,7 .. 1;;; ... "':. ;.;,1 rf;! ~ " :i: 1111(-T. • I i'flll•-D5 r~ L. 0, ' i i i ' '<J _______ ...,., ... ,,."' ... "'"' ::':_~~<: .. :./ '',j ""'""'~D "',s, ,,-,er Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton, Washington By: cjw I Date 09128115 Pro1ect # LY 15160360 amec foster wheeler ... Figure 3 1$ amec .~ foster · wheeler APPENDIX A Photographic Log Ph oto 1 Ph oto 2 APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton , Washington p:\boeing renton\Jy15160360 apron d permitting\reports\apron d utilities\appendices\appencfa a\a pron_a_photo_log_092915.doc:x ~ amec ,. foster wheeler Amee Fos te r Wheeler A-1 amec foster wheeler Photo 3 Photo 4 APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton , Washington West bank of LCR immediate! south of south brid e Lookin southwest from east bank of LCR at west bank Amee Foster Wheeler A-2 p:\boeing ren\on\ly15160360 apron d permitting\Jepons\apron d utilities\appendices\appendix a\apron_a_photo_log_092915.docx Photo 5 Pho to 6 Ja APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton , Washington p:\boeing renton\ly 15160360 apron d permitting\reports\elpron d ut1liti es\appendices\appendix a\apron_a_photo_log_092915.docx ame c '~ ··~ foster wheel er A mee Fos ter Whee ler A-3 I amec~ foster whee ler Photo 7 Photo 8 APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton , Washington Blackber on west bank of LCR south of south brid e Amee Foster Whee ler A-4 p:\boeing ren ton~y15160360 apron d permitt1nglreports\apron d u\Jl1ties\ilppendices\Bppend 1x a\apron_a_photo_tog_0929 15.docx Ph oto 9 Ph oto 10 APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton , Washington p:\boeing renlon~y15160360 apron d permitting\reports\apron d ulil1ties·~ppendices\appendix a\apron_a_photo_log_092915.doc11: amec '~ ""~ foster whee le r Amee Fo ster Wheeler A-5 I amec ~ foste r wh eeler Ph oto 11 Ph oto 12 Amee Foster Wheeler A-6 APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton, Washington p:\boeing renton\ly15160360 apron d permitling\Jepor1s\apron d utilities\appendices\appendi~ a\a pron_a _photo_log_092915.doc~ APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Apron D Util ity Upgrade Project Renton , Washington Photo 13 Lookin so uth fr om bri d e at east bank of th e LCR note alder t rees at left center Photo 14 Lookin north from so uth bri d eat eas t ban k of LCR amec ~ foster wheeler Amee Fos ter W heele r p:\bo e1ngrenton ~y15160360aprondperm1tting\repons\aprond util iti es\a ppendices\appendi;,;a\apron_a___photo_log _092915.doc;,; A-7 amec ~ foster wheeler Photo 15 Photo 16 Amee Fo ster W hee ler A-8 APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton , Washington rass in fore rou nd p:\boe1ng ren lon\Jy15160360 apron d permi!1ing\reports\apron d utiliU es\appendices\appendix a\a pron_a_photo_log_0929 15.docx Ph oto 17 APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Boeing Apron D Utility Upgrade Project Renton , Washington Photo 18 Lookin sou th towa rd south brid e at ve ela tio n al on east bank of LCR p:\lloeing tenton\Jy 15160360 aprond perrnitting\reports\apron d ut,lities\appendices\appenc1x a\apron_a_photo_log_092915.docx ~ amec /Ji; foster wheeler Amee Fos ter Wheele r A-9 Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment Face Page COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by File No.: NCS-339701-WAI FIRST AMERICAN TillE INSURANCE COMPANY First American Title Insurance Company, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagor of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of the Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." First American Title Insurance Company By: // l'k/ ,,,yu //~----President Attest: /J1 uLt1-~ Secretary By: r-T ~ Countersigned First American 77tle Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-339701-WAl Page No. 1 2101 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98121 To: (206)728-0400 FAX (206)448-6348 Mike Cooper (206)615-3107 mcooper@firstam.com Boeing Realty Corporation Triton Tower Two, MC 6R6-10, 700 S Renton Village Pl. Renton, WA 98055-3235 Attn: Jeff Adelson SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: February 12, 2008 at 7:30 A.M. 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Standard Owner's Coverage Proposed Insured: To Follow AMOUNT $ To Follow $ Vincent Nguyenpham (206)615-3267 vnguyenpham@firstam.com File No.: NCS-339701-WAl Your Ref No.: 800 Park Ave. N PREMIUM TAX To Follow $ To Follow 3. The estate or interest in the land described on Page 2 herein is Fee Simple, and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Rrst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: File No.: NCS-339701-WA! Page No. 2 A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUN1Y WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 2 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND WESTERLY OF LOGAN STREET NORTH EXTENSION AS DEEDED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3261297, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH MARGIN OF 6TH AVENUE NORTH AND THE WEST MARGIN OF LOGAN STREET NORTH; THENCE NORTH 89°34'11" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH MARGIN OF 6TH AVENUE NORTH, 674.91 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE BOEING COMPANY, BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 21, 1964 UNDER RECORDING NO. 5701683, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89°34'1" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN, 441.54 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 2, AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUN1Y SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 211409; THENCE SOUTH 12°47'42" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 328. 72 FEET TO INTERSECTION WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 320.00 FEET SOUTH OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO, THE SOUTH MARGIN OF 6TH AVENUE NORTH; THENCE SOUTH 89°34'11" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 366.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0°25'49" EAST 320.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN STATE ROAD NO. 7, BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 27, 1910 UNDER RECORDING NO. 690659 IN KING COUN1Y, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: PORTION OF EAST HALF OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUN1Y, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE CEDAR RIVER WATER WAY NO. 2 AND NORTHERLY OF NORTH 6TH STREET IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; EXCEPT THAT PORTION FOR NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY; EXCEPT STREETS; TOGETHER WITH VACATED LOGAN STREET LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF A LINE 30 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF THE GOVERNMENT MEANDER LINE; TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORE LANDS ADJACENT; Rrst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-339701-WA! Page No. 3 TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET AND THE MARGIN OF LOGAN STREET NORTH; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID STREET 995.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89018'45" WEST TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF CEDAR RIVER WATER WAY NO. 2; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID MARGIN TO THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET; THENCE EAST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE 328.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89045'45" EAST 366.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00014'15" WEST TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET; THENCE WEST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 137.70 FEET THEREOF; TOGETHER WITH PORTIONS OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST AND SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 WITH THE WEST MARGIN SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE WEST 763.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43006'56" WEST 680.06 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE INNER HARBOR LINE; THENCE SOUTH 46052'27" WEST ALONG SAID LINE 607.89 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 43006'56" EAST 713.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46053'04" WEST 215 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20038'24" WEST TO THE NORTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID NORTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT-OF- WAY; EXCEPT BURLINGTON NORTHERN OPERATING STRIP ADJOINING PORTION OF SOUTHEASTERLY LINE IN SAID SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST; EXCEPT ROAD NO. 7; TOGETHER WITH VACATED LOGAN STREET LYING NORTHERLY OF SPUR TRACKS; TOGETHER WITH BLOCK C LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS 3RD SUPPLEMENTAL; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO CITY OF RENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 17, 2006 AND DECEMBER 12, 2006 UNDER RECORDING NO'S. 20060817000676 AND 20061212000338 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. Rrst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B -SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the Requirements to be complied with: File No.: NCS-339701-WAl Page No. 4 Item (A) Payment to or for the account of the Granters or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (B) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. Item (C) Pay us the premiums, fees and charges for the policy. Item (D) You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land. We may then make additional requirements or exceptions SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain Exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of person in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, confiicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. E. (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records; ( 4) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, materials or medical assistance theretofore or herealter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgages thereon covered by this Commitment. Rrst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-339701-WAI Page No. 5 SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 (continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Lien of the Real Estate Excise Sales Tax and Surcharge upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. As of the date herein, the excise tax rate for the City of Renton is at 1.78%. Levy/Area Code: 2100 For all transactions recorded on or after July 1, 2005: A fee of $10.00 will be charged on all exempt transactions; A fee of $5.00 will be charged on all taxable transactions in addition to the excise tax due. 2. General Taxes for the year 2008. Tax Account No.: 072305-9046-08 Amount Billed: $ 16,452.46 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 16,452.46 Assessed Land Value: $ 1,681,400.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 (Affects Parcel No. A) 3. General Taxes for the year 2008. Tax Account No.: Amount Billed: Amount Paid: Amount Due: Assessed Land Value: Assessed Improvement Value: (Affects Parcel No. B) 072305-9001-01 $ 1,938,298.20 $ 0.00 $ 1,938,298.20 $ 89,622,700.00 $ 108,614,000.00 4. Agreement to indemnify the United States of America against damages arising by reason of the lowering of Lake Washington, recorded January 3, 1907, under Recording No. 450952. 5. (Affects Parcel No. B) Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: By: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation; and Pacific Coast Railroad Company, a Washington corporation (formerly known and called Columbia & Puget Recorded: Recording No.: Regarding: (Affects Parcel No. B) Sound Railroad Company) January 2, 1929 2509355 Joint usage of harbor area Rrst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-339701-WA! Page No. 6 6. Matters that may be determined by examination of City of Renton Ordinance Nos. 1146 and 2201. Said Ordinances are not available for examination. (Affects Parcel No. B) 7. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: November 18, 1941 under Recording No. 3204562 In Favor of: Pacific Coast R.R. Co. For: Spur track Affects: (Parcel BJ portion of said premises 8. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: May 19, 1942 under Recording No. 3241098 In Favor of: State of Washington For: Public road and highway Affects: (Parcel BJ as described therein The location of the easement cannot be determined from record information. 9. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: January 27, 1943 under Recording No. 3289034 In Favor of: The City of Renton For: Drainage pipeline Affects: (Parcel BJ portion of said premises 10. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled Permit, executed by and between The City of Seattle, a municipal corporation and The City of Renton, recorded March 29, 1943 as Instrument No. 3299638 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. BJ 11. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: December 2, 1943 under Recording No. 3352228 In Favor of: Northern Pacific Railway Company For: Railroad tracks Affects: (Parcel B) as described therein The location of the easement cannot be determined from record information. 12. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: December 2, 1943 under Recording No. 3352229 In Favor of: Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Wisconsin corporation For: Construct, maintaining and operating a track connecting Affects: (Parcel B) as described therein The location of the easement cannot be determined from record information. Rrst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-339701-WA! Page No. 7 13. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: August 9, 1951 under Recording No. 4166571 In Favor of: Renton School District No. 403 For: Sewer Affects: (Parcel B) portion of said premises 14. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: July 20, 1956 under Recording No. 4713420 In Favor of: Renton School District No. 403, a municipal corporation For: Sewer Affects: (Parcel B) portion of said premises Toe location of the easement cannot be determined from record information. 15. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: May 15, 1957 under Recording No. 4797325 For: Electric transmission line Affects: (Parcel B) portion of said premises 16. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: September 5, 1961 under Recording No. 5325652 In Favor of: City of Renton, a municipal corporation For: To construct, operate and maintain a public street and highway Affects: (Parcel B) portion of said premises 17. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: January 17, 1986 under Recording No. 8601170666 In Favor of: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation For: Construct, maintain, repair replace and enlarge guy wires and anchors Affects: (Parcel B) portion of said premises 18. Toe terms, provisions and easement(s) contained in the document entitled "Recreational Trail Easement and Agreement" recorded September 17, 1992 as Recording No. 9209171541 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. B) 19. Toe terms and provisions contained in the document entitled Amendment to Bridge Permit, executed by and between Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, a division of Toe Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation, recorded September 17, 1992 as Instrument No. 9209171553 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. B) 20. Toe terms and provisions contained in the document entitled Agreement and License for Extension of Boeing Domestic Water and Compressed Air Supply Lines, executed by and between Rrst American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-339701-WAl Page No. 8 The City of Renton, a municipal corporation and The Boeing Company, by and through its division, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, recorded February 3, 1994 as Instrument No. 9402030678 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. B) 21. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: November 17, 2000 Recording No.: 20001117000535 22. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: November 17, 2000 Recording No.: 20001117001354 (Affects Parcel No. A) 23. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled Development Agreement, executed by and between The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation and The City of Renton, a municipal corporation, recorded August 2, 2002 as Instrument No. 20020802000224 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. A) 24. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: May 30, 2003 under Recording No. 20030530001413 In Favor of: Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington corporation For: Transmission, distribution and sale of electricity Affects: (Parcel B) portion of said premises 25. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled Development Agreement for Renton Plant Redevelopment, executed by and between The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation and The City of Renton, a municipal corporation, recorded December 10, 2003 as Instrument No. 20031210001637 of Official Records. 26. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: December 28, 2004 Recording No.: 20041228001871 27. The terms, provisions and easement(s) contained in the document entitled "Temporary Stormwater Facility Easement Agreement" recorded December 28, 2004 as Recording No. 20041228001862 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. B) 28. The terms, provisions and easement(s) contained in the document entitled "Utility Easement Agreement" recorded December 28, 2004 as Recording No. 20041228001863 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. B) First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment File No.: NCS-339701-WAl Page No. 9 29. The terms, provisions and easement(sJ contained in the document entitled "Water Line Easement Agreement" recorded December 28, 2004 as Recording No. 20041228001864 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. BJ 30. The terms, provisions and easement(sJ contained in the document entitled "Utility Easement Agreement" recorded December 28, 2004 as Recording No. 20041228001865 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. BJ 31. The terms, provisions and easement(sJ contained in the document entitled "Temporary Access and Utility Easement Agreement" recorded December 28, 2004 as Recording No. 20041228001866 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. BJ 32. The terms, provisions and easement(s) contained in the document entitled "Temporary Stormwater Facility Easement Agreement" recorded December 28, 2004 as Recording No. 20041228001867 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. B) 33. The terms, provisions and easement(s) contained in the document entitled "Water Line Easement Agreement" recorded December 28, 2004 as Recording No. 20041228001868 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. B) 34. The terms, provisions and easement(s) contained in the document entitled "Water Line Easement Agreement" recorded December 28, 2004 as Recording No. 20041228001869 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. B) 35. The terms, provisions and easement(s) contained in the document entitled "Temporary Stormwater Facility Easement Agreement" recorded December 28, 2004 as Recording No. 20041228001870 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel No. B) 36. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: December 28, 2004 Recording No.: 20041228001871 (Affects Parcel No. B) 37. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled Strander Agreement, executed by and between The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation and The City of Renton, a municipal corporation, recorded April 20, 2006 as Instrument No. 20060420001032 of Official Records. 38. Mechanics Lien. First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment Claimant: Against: Amount: For: Date Work Commenced: Date Work Ceased: Recorded: Recording No.: (Affects Parcel No. B) 39. Mechanics Lien. Claimant: Against: Amount: For: Date Work Commenced: Date Work Ceased: Recorded: Recording No.: G & W Commercial Flooring, Inc. Millenium Building $1,326.45 Labor and/or Materials and/or Equipment September 26, 2007 September 27, 2007 December 20, 2007 20071220000512 Straight Line Striping, Inc. Millennium Building Company, Inc. $4,221.70 Labor and/or Materials and/or Equipment October 1, 2007 October 18, 2007 January 11, 2008 20080111001220 File No.: NCS-339701-WAl Page No. 10 Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded January 18, 2008 as Recording No. 20080118001094 of Official Records. (Affects Parcel B and other property) 40. Any question as to the true location of the lateral boundaries of the Second Class 1ide Lands. 41. Rights of the general public to the unrestricted use of all the waters of a navigable body of water not only for the primary purpose of navigation, but also for corollary purposes; including (but not limited to) fishing, boating, bathing, swimming, water skiing and other related recreational purposes, as those waters may affect the tidelands, shorelands or adjoining uplands and whether the level of the water has been raised naturally or artificially to a maintained or fiuctuating level, all as further defined by the decisional law of this state. (Affects all of the premises subject to such submergence) 42. 1itle to vest in an incoming owner whose name is not disclosed. Such name must be furnished to us so that a name search may be made. 43. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any, rights of vendors and security agreement on personal property and rights of tenants, and secured parties to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. First American Tltle Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment INFORMATIONAL NOTES File No.: NCS-339701-WAl Page No. 11 A. Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington State Statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. B. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. C. If this preliminary report/commitment was prepared based upon an application for a policy of title insurance that identified land by street address or assessor's parcel number only, it is the responsibility of the applicant to determine whether the land referred to herein is in fact the land that is to be described in the policy or policies to be issued. D. The description can be abbreviated as suggested below if necessary to meet standardization requirements. The full text of the description must appear in the document(s) to be insured. ptn Sec 5 Twp 23N Rge 05E, SW Qtr, ptn Sec 6 Twp 23N Rge 05E, SE Qtr, ptn Sec 7, Twp 23N Rge 05E and ptn Sec 8 Twp 23N Rge 05E, NW Qtr APN: 072305-9046-08 APN: 072305-9001-01 E. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this Commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. END OF SCHEDULE B First American Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations File No.; NCS-339701-WA! Page No. 12 1. The term "mortgage" when used herein shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment, other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act or reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclosure such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option, may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of Policy or Policies committed for, and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the Policy or Policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of Policy or Policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references, and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the Insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. Rrst American 77t!e Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment The First American Corporation First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services PRIVACY POLICY We Are Committed to safeguarding Customer Information File No.: NCS-339701-WAl Page No. 13 In order to better sef'\le your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American Corporation, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy go'w'erns our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values, a copy of which can be found on our website at www.firstam.com. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: Use of Information Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and· Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of usj or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such Information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any Internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal Information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal Information. c 2001 The First American Corporation -All Rights Reserved First American Title Insurance Company C.H. ADSirs LAKE WASHINGTDN PLAT 1;,. ,, i I I .. -,,,., .... --: I I C.H. ADSIT'S LAKE WASHINGTON PLAT •, ® Kl"IGGOVNP' DEl'"A!1HIENT ol ASSESSMENTS -:c, ---9' ~\ \ SE 07-23-05 \ .\~ I \1 \ \\ \ \\ C. H A()SIT'S l..AICE WASHINGTON PU.T -,. \ \I\ \ i I \· l/ \ I · , I ','-i: \ \ \ l~-~-----,c:-··· _··~~---,....,--~;;_::_ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I \·--\ i ______ _J ® NWOB-23-05 KINl3C:0Uf,{fV ·--:-· DEf'A~TMEN'T QI ASSESSMENTS _J O'~G \1$~ .. ,_. ., .'''"" .... ,., -------·------ .f'' \.-....,-------~~-----.~~:7 / --4.l:!O SUPPLEMENT OF LAl(E WASHINGrDN SHURE LANDS /' ·, / ", ./ / / ------------- '· ,•, ·-~----j I ! i I I I _J .,~--~ SUPPLEM!;NT OF LAKE WASHING I-ON SHOFIE LANDS /. / ./ / ,Ii'' 7 / -· "'...· ® Klr.OC(ll,Jl'jTY [l~M.RTMENTc1ASSESSMENTS 1------~--··----~--·---,,7 \ \\ .\ \\ \\ '\' ,.\ \\ Ii + NE0~.}3-05 .,.. C.H. _f/dsitJJ Lak'€H",ash_;~J.,,on PLLd .So4/e /<l6 /ee.f • 1 t'rw/L/ j l 11 l i!i*fil'.@iitffg~;t}::C~i.~fI:>:;fJ:.~:~¥¥£1fJ;}2Zzf~!~ff:!~?;;:!::.:::: ::::.~,:;;;"",~;;1::~"::;:~.t~:,,.:;,-::::.;~:·:.:-: .:·1;;;::,.,~ .. :.'~;;:;,Jt;.~;u,~ .• ~::::~::.:: .. ·;..'":::;~;;;~~-=:.,._,,/::;.,,;::./:-'.J:n;:; ,~iJiF::.:~~=:~;·;;;~: .. ;;;, ..... ,, ..... ··-", -,.~-,--· ·-...... h_ ••• ·--· #---· -.. h .. ~--- .... ,: ___ 'l; •• ........ i~Erit?J~s .,., ...... # u,,:}, d'>,/,.,, ..-, ,// V ,11.M .,,.,.,,. .,..~· ;;;..,., :u-,,~r.!'r"~~ ,z, -...,. ...... -... ?<'• .,.,,,_, ...... ~,,.v ·-___ ,,. .. ~.,,-... ay ·······~:2~.2-~:::-£::::::'; ::S::::::::::.:·:~~;:.::::.:~:£~~:?.:?:~~;~::~~:-:.::~::::-~i ... ·, .. ---.-·~-------·---'--·----:.....-..-.. ':,::....,.. / First American Title Company Detail"A" a . .. Detail"B" BJ Tax ID: 072305-9001 & 9046 Short Legal: A Portion of County of King Reference No : 339701 County: King /tee Page 02 Map Not To Scale Plotted Easements Legend LJPARCELA LJPARCELB - 11/18/1941 # 3204562 (Construction) 05/19/1942 #3241098 (Road-Not Plottable) - 01/27/1943 # 3289034 (Drainage Pipeline) 12/02/1943 # 3352228 (Railroad-Not Plottable) 12/02/1943 # 3352229 (Construction-Not Plottable) ./\ 08109/1951 # 4166571 (Sewer) 07/20/1956 # 4713420 (Sewer-Not Plottable) 05/15/1957 # 4797325 D (Electric Transmission Line) f:%%'J 09/05/1961 #5325652 =.,;; (Public Street) 01/17/1986 # 8601170666 (Enlarge Guy Wires & Anchors) 09/17/1992 # 9209171541 (Recreational Trail) 05/30/2003 # 0530001413 (Transmission, Anchor) Thismapmayormayno1baasurveyofthelanddep,ctedhere<"Jn You should not rely upon~ for any purpose other than onen1ation tothegenerallocalionoltheparcelorparcelsdep,cted F,rst American T"rtleexpressJyd1scla1msany liab,l~yloralleged loss or damage which may result from reliance upon this map / 0 First American Title Company Detail"C" Tax ID: 072305-9001 & 9046 Short Legal: A Portion of County of King Reference No : 339701 County: King Map Not To Scale Plotted Easements Legend LJPARCELA LJPARCELB - 11/18/1941 #3204562 (Construction) - 01/27/1943 # 3289034 (Drainage Pipeline) r'7l 05/15/1957 # 4797325 ~ (Electric Transmission Line) = 09/05/1961 # 5325652 = (Public Street) ;::.c:--, 05/30/2003 # 0530001413 ' .. :·i (Transmission, Anchor) Th1smapmayormaynotbeasur..eyofthelanddep,ciedhereon You should no! rely upon~ for any purp<ise other than onen1a11on tothegenerallocat11Jnoftheparcelorparcelsdep,cted First AmencanTdleexpresslydisclaimsany liab1htyforalleged loss or damage which may result ffom reliance upon this map ·-:;;::~~1-m-:----~-- WARR,\NTY DEED .. ror arid tn tl3nsideratton of thl' ~t.1n, ,ii - fo~ ~~~us~ ·atd n9/UXr(j4 .. ooo.90}-' z -.. --• • r,tia"mJ:paid.the'ret.·cipt•yh1.:1t>vf,i,\,,n.>l,.,.,al..1l,,~hJ.,d 1, .• ,1. ,nn•,, 1HII•,· ,,•, , 1 [ WashlogtQn'. the follo.....lM dc:,1-'.ribN ft"lil i:_.1 .. ," ~11,1;.ttl!d .,, {r,;r. · ~i.hFSnte-nl_W1!.Sbm!1tmf, tu•Wtl. • • · • -•• __ ... --· ., A stii,:, of land 100 rcr;;t y.i,da.'i)11."'lg 5-. f"l'lt,, un t.ha l'i&Qt,ri.v e, l~ .•1d 't.l r .... t ~n. !.~~ etlt'lterb 111rl~ of the _c-Jtit.,r lino .Jf '!1-1..ld hir;.!."".)' ,;;. ~ur 'i ... ,l ..,, · r SJ"l.c't i.t:l"\J" • , ir~11t po~i.ion of aov,u·a.:ie-nt. L.1?t 1.tn · ,;r.tbn lo,tow,1mJ.,., 'lor"!.h.Ri.ni;':'1 ,-: :t ~.L · l~iu13terl.y-·ot Comi~<?rcll.l >'nt-•r1;11!'-_~c1 .. tr,i:-~ "o-. _r.t'J.t ,r "'·~ .. .,rl • ~t-:'.J 'J~ • -tll.e.ltOrthern ? .. cine R&.Uw•,.1 Co .... ,:ce~ rltht t.1f' •-..Y" •,0'.1 "7Mt l)Qrlion or th~ ·si ... ...,..-""Eu Jscti,m 7 .-r oirn Jbi, -.'.I .,or th, 'ltb.Ji,., ,-~ , <Jl .w. ·1. L . 1g • .,,;~. ~r1 :,f0oi.'!'l"-i"¢1al '1ater-11a, Diotrif::t":lo.', rl~ht vf 11,; un,1 ~ st rl, Jf \')~ -or~h•:-u ·'.r-,f'1r, ..,.llllhJ' right of -wa:,,!X.CEPT roo.d!! AITT 1·xcrp7 :i. tr .. ('t .?r i ,t)d i":icr. ,.,,.. ,., ",,: 1 ,, ~ ~:3tr1ct If~~ ~ ~:,~o~ ~~t. 11~~\~;:~~~r~~r,1t':!:·;h '"f ,!;~; :~:".~-;;~~ 1 · ::~ ·.;~',\.,<\ .. ~ ~nn->r of Oav11rnment Lot. " 1.n ~ ... 1'1 .:.Octton '1-;l"lJl\.~,;.::11, th·~'!! .· ,,t.,rl.:·, •. r,,llki • ,..1 • f11 .. t ~.:.!t-lot South frorn th!! ~outb 11'nt1 of e:i,i.tl ;o.,ir-_nooe-nt t.il'. • '"':"· f"""~l t:i• "'I'·· q,., ·~. ' ·• rt 11~ fi"i!ltJ"ttwnce ~ • .,~t~l.),f. .. ri..H<>l w th~ :-~Ju"".h 11'1 .. of g, t1 :"•••r,1. .. >nt 1.ri -; ,·-f'~ "· or·1,.,,,to tbe Norlbc,"!lterV ~.1"t,1n or s11.J.d ,· .. ~'1_l'"'H,' r.1~n• -,,· •. ,t'i, ~.... Ft.,i .• ·r.t • ·...! .,_- ~~.ld ijo~r..st'JT}y margin 174 r"'""t,mor'J or le.s, t..J '.ht' ?1."lt ;f r"sl111 .· ... 1 .i. · •<";•. · · tr'.<'t or 1~· deser ... ved 1':I foll,;:,11,sz bi..t;iQnl.;le, .t 1,ho o..'lt-r, si~t.1. ,i• or t11• ('o •, , , t..'l :" ·1~,l,,.r 3tr,.ot. ill the '::lt!' of Jumton ,n,i ~ ~.a:,':. :a, !'"it r. ur \.,\• ..e, l,''l.+-M', : .,,... "1-";.·~1~ l«~ ·rl ?''t of ,s1y:;ttt'!ne11 South o~JOl&,p ""'s' ;,lont t./\e .. ,n •. :i:. ri;i"> ·,f -ec.~tl "'4il,.,:•·.r-'l · • ·:" 1-.~7 t.n.-1 r~,t t"I "li" Sou.thea.attt:C'"J.J' ie, .. rglri. or .Lho ';l':..r .J ~~-.t.l~ :'r....11,,..1.-~"m ;j 'l.t,.., ri;.r• ~ • ,;•• thenc~ 3ou!h. 46°!15'2'1'' i'.e:!lt 15 3.~ feet t .. a ,..ol"l• oh • .. he-~d··"<r1 .i..fr.t, ·_r, d •.:n1 •:"~•·'! ~t,,I'W8j .IJ-btrict :lo.~ ri~ht or 11a,qthenee-J1ot"lh 1'·"'5 t;i,•• "~t ~lc>•1: o --:;.Q of ~aj.d r.4ter'lfay i-lght of' ~&..:,.~:.>9.a& fr-ro~, ~Ii.en,..~ '1orth 1·.,:-.::,1; ... r .... ,. l " .. • t 1 t.he South iMrgln or auid l'.e31'lt ,3\.rtiitti thepc<l :1ort.h "!'..I"~ 'lC" .. t,fi.ll'lr •,Ii, .,,i '· 111r.r_gln or sdd Ye-el'irr St.r .. i.tt, to 'i°M .,a!l).t or Lq£inn1111~·· . '::1tt 6tr1" of land h&rel."I_ b&bt; cOl'lv<t~l'd. eontrt.1nt11g 4.'IJ ,..,J"H·,i..,r• en-V' U,l ;pt'C'if,t dl'L1!£ conC'eu1,n~ .,11 ,,I ,, ,h .,J'C ,., br 1, unn'. , ,·t," Lh,1• ,~1t:"'' n,·.,,.,I ,, ·" ru.w ol rti'O'!'I! i.ml on hh 1,, n,~-,,1)1,, . .f 11 LJ,,,,, 1., .. ,., Hr..L•· .i. ,1 t 1 ""I,. , • ,,. ord\.il A,irll, 7.th,1942 ·· · ' t,":hr,,.Gr1r..n\?rsher,,1n l"eisr:ne .. th•'".r~ht. t,.;i, r'l.l:IOV".t thA~;r'lll'e~:mt'> fron t,t.,, l•rir'"l ';-· ·· (rfJ t~~,:=~~-~~1!1~~! ~t:~~:~r;t~~e~:~i~~ ::;:!;~n·,~}h · 1; i -,o ~ · -1, , ..... Plt.iodJ all Ulprov11.menta y~t r& ...a.ini .g u.,on ot' µ.,.rl:l.ally UIJ'll, v, 'I.fl l ,iavh' "h• 1 1 .. ~·, .,. • 1 .. prG~ ;)£ tlwl S't.tl.te of 'Piashfm::t.an did 'lll r1&.bte oft.he. GMnY.irl hcT'~ln to 3·,1-' t· .. •V'"· ,,~nt.s shall the ¢&Gee und '.OO'mL'lt\te ---' • -• ' > ..... \\'t.rs,; ~-~~,.-"'V"r, I ~ t. ' , · __ Ji -~~'i•l,,i!>.l.111d.!!~j.111,l ;..•t~IU l'•L',1,.,,,.,1. ,,J ,.I,~ •~1•h1C'J: .. 1 !.,u.• ,,.,. 1' ~ .. ntil ll!_Vo~l'd buL ,b.:i.1 . f,,, tr, n ~ ,.,,.1 ,,\lo. ~,1 .. ,. I cr,·•ll ch ,:1 , ,, t.<h·.:. ... 1c Im, l·•l..: , ,''"' •,, ~\'lr.shlnghnJunJl!.'lof.anJ ,u. ,, 11,,,1 •1.•d ,,,u 'iil)[• .,,, t,., .. ,) ., ,., , ·! I~· tk, ,t.1'l .L \• • _ PJ.r}meht ~ ~1Slw,;,y. b, .i,,.. J{-./".t ... \" •• ~n !l .. t~nb~ l~th Pa} l!f Jul.Y l'l-1 i Acttipt.cd and appron•d tl><• • ~ATE OF JHA51tI~CTO:N .Pu.Mrr.ME:1-.'!' OI" H,ru\• .,~s ~~ _ J~:~, f1 ~-i E~~·~~~:~ ~ ,, 'If "\"/'' .. )4 -~ "-,.·, ,M_.~1..:: <:>).....,._ ~ '· .. _ . -,-..-:-.-.' -~ .... ~:--~.;i} ;:-~·t~-' . ' . -'County pf --,uRO...--~ _/j.. .-: -I,~ a n~tai=y ~bl!~ in and fot !;he State of Washmgton. hereby eerllfy that nn !:hr, ___ ;L~ll>-.<18)'-<>f: .. • __ ··----·---~-= l.tia ""'°""IIY 4Pl"U«l bofu~"' __ :_ .. ~~:-@lid .T!IN~ ~op.,-Jl1J Id.a !'1.J'e,, -. :.~_:--:=.---·~ . ,--~ !::-~~.JmlJ~·~f~·~ ~.!!' ~~l ~"' ~,nct&!d.tnmid.wh~-e't-ecutecHhrr"im1~0mg~~-=-~· -~~.tlia~-.11isned and sealed lhc same as thair lrtc pnd voltmtniy :tct and dl'l-1. fo· -L-~·thq, Uef, ~BB themn mentioned ' · ha~d a~d-901•:•l seol lh• doy •t~°" ~:.,.._.,. "Nol11t11P1<blo(filmylfortl!•-&fei~~' -Rnfrhrig al lfll'r!e:r-Ia1and ~~-~ of ~fort rnc_pt!r~PB.i!,, ,lp!)('l'·~- ~ :.1, __ •-'~ • (lnd _'( • Ulmoknown be the --........._ 1 • -• and , , of·thr C<lrpor.itlon thAt c)l.ccuted thP fCl~o1•1J! instrument ar,,l ,1cknow)('dp;cd said l~~nl t., .. lt,, i:~ ,. free and voluntary act a.nd de~ oI ~,11,l cOT~tl'ln to, tJic tlf.D.'1 and purposes lhcn:m monl:l(ln~II ul\d Ol\onth s~!i!"dthat ribt.11':_nt,•tl ln f>'\t'rU!t;> <,;110\ -11.,1ri1rnc,nt and ti l tin n[li,i.rd, li. Ole corporaLl' scol of said co1porJl1i1t1. ' • Ginn unde,r rny 1'1,u,r\ ar,(I 1•ilh:!ol ~r-11 the dn·~· nnd)•~fll; last abO}r' \vrlhC'n • -. . ' ! 'l~ ~\ ~-:,1 :, ~-i. -• • Rf:Jt~8/m.1~1,) . . -'..if!;. -tf . OEI' T :~2)i,~~r;;;~·~,~~~~~:-,_.)-. -··-···· -~:~-~ · GltA!ftOR, IUU1'f01f SCBOaL DIH'llIC'r NO. 403, KDa COUlf.l'Y, a municipal corporation of the Stat. o~ Waehington, for and in consider- ation of !1!.irty !1!.ouaand Doll.nra (fJO, 000.00) in hanc2 paid, conveys <>ml warrant. to 'fBII :Bal:tm COJIPABY, a Delaware cori;,oration duly a11thorized to do bu11ineaa in the state of 1faahington. the £ol1owing describad real estate, located. in the Ci..:.y of Renton, County of King, st.ate of Waehing- t.ons · ~ · · · -, -· · 'l'hat por-.:ion of t.ha eoutheaat cr.iarter of the southeast I quarter of section 7, townahip 23 north. range 5 eastr W .IL, in King Cow,ty, lfashington, lying naterly of eor-rcial Watuway Diatric,t .llo. 2 right of way and --weaterly of Logan Street Rorth Rxt.anaion aa deaded to 1 the State ot 11aabington by deed .recorded under auditor• s file llo. 3261297, cleacrl.becl aa foll.ows, Be9inning at the south margin of 6th Avenue North and I the west margin of Logan Street Hort.h: ther-..::e north 09•34' 11" \reB't (Llullbert Meridian, North Zone), a.lcng · the south margin of 6th Avenue lll:rth, 449. 91 feet to th• true point. of beginning, thence continuing north s,·341 ll" veet, a.long a.a.id aout.h mar9in. 225,.00 feet: thence south 0•25•49" west 320.00 feet; thence. north 89°34' 11" west, parallel to and .320.00 feet south, , meas.rad at right .angles to the south margin of 6t.h I Avanue Borthl' a diatanc:e of 366.34 feet to the easterly line of Commerc:ia.l waterway District Ho. 2 right-of-way; "' thence south 12:1147•42• east, along said right-of-way, a: 82 .18 feet to an intersection with a. line parallel with ~na .400.00 feet south of,, maaeureci at. right an.qlea to. , 6th Avenue North; thence south 896 34 1 11'1 east along 1 ,said parallel line, 572.5-1" feet, thence north 0°25'49" · eaat, 400 .. 00 feat to the tJ:ue point of beginninQ. Together with all easements. privileges, rights and franchises and appurtenances belonging thereto or benefitting the said real estate. IN WI'I'llBSS lfflBRBOP, SAid municipal corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper. officers and it& corporate seal to be Hereunto affixed this ~ day of January , 1964. RBliTOIIT SCHOOL DISTI\J:CT ·NO. 403, KDaG COUNTY, a municipal corpo- ration of the State of Washington, G~-. ' , / B~~k"l.£ili-----;:;:~,~ [; .. ~'-'-J ,· Its President SBDOPlfMRIJO!OII) I as. comrrr OP nm l On this ....ll!!\_ day o:f l•!HU 1964, before ae, the under•ignad, a llotary Public: in and fol:' the State of Washington, duly COIIIIU.asioned am:! aworn, peraonally appaared I\Nt ft.lSRtHi and M, I JP9119D , t.o IN known to be t:he .Pre8ident and Sflcratuy reapectively of SCBOOIL m.anu~ BO. 403,. ICillJ COUB'.fY, the municipal corporaUon tl>at ftec:u1:ed tl>e foregoinq instrument, and acl<nowledged the said iru,tr..,.nt to be the free and voluntary act and dud of aaid. Scr.ool Di•trict, !or the use• and purpo•s 'therein n.,en- tianed, and on oath •tated that they WIN authorized to execute the said inatrU111ent and that the seal. affixed is the corporate seal of Hid School Diatrict. OXVIIII under my ban,! and official nal this ...!ll!!.. day of .l•PHU , 1964. -Ad,-./ 4 ,7? '"":.. . , lilotuy Pl>blic in and for the_jltate of .lfaallington, residing at .(:< ..• t, ~~ ""''"' .(_LL#C First American Title Insurance Company NATIONAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES NOTICE OF MISSING DOCUMENT COUNTY: King RECORDED DATE: n/a RECORDING INFORMATION: Court Case# 211409 ORDER NO.: 339701 EXCEPTION NO.: Legal Description 03 DATE REQUEST: Z/21/2008 Please be advised that the document listed above is missing from our plant. First American is attempting to obtain a legible copy of this document. It will be sent to all parties upon receipt. [i fi Ii 1,1 . ,,!' c,: i ,( I f I l ! I I I I I i '1 .I i I I i I I I li I, <1 I . r. ·t i 1 I I I f ~ :2.> "::'~'' \(·/~ '.f"": 7f ; 0 0 l --·,.---------h '/1,#??mrn 4~ "/ -;~--i:: -. t----/· / (/ --'1' --_ .,/ -..... 1Q_--. l ~-........,_,,.. '-----v_. ·: ,"' ---' '::ZO G .crl...,,,,.-,.,...,,.'11/I lmr/Wi°'W:_J-~{J ·~ 'JJWO t.rn•in-~r= "'('l"?l~ri t ---,,r,-&,-,:wtYTJ/?;Jf7~fa/?" !,-,+1-y'"J?'o"i/ -_--·•v1;7-"Yr · 10,,;·p!!, ·--.. -~7.t,,:Xiif;,,,r'f-:V'V · · __ [!i , " <L .. , -!!. '/ii::;Pi · · • c:_ · ·(,(ltf ,,-.,.,,,. /v7 -~ l~1~z .. 0 ~:::~~~~(t-~~~~u~·~4~-r-f•~,~-7ft~~ ···,-,.77~~?;~['-'}'Tj.,l,...,d>-7""'"'7~?"'T-;;"!,l;,t./,_,,..;m1';.17~" 71'1'",_-...,, ]<n,1,ff-_~"'"'_ P"'t'J'J_ ,...,_-,,y,'7 .,. ;c y ,-v,;;,,_, .. • C"'~--.?';,_/,. ,' -~-,-,~ ; •. j_,>'7ZJ_ ~-/...,,... / • -V / •---r," • . ·_,-.,e . / . '<'/:' "''?~ ~-/--,· ( =· /'V"?J':k. 7..,.;.,r,!Ml -~_ ·-r:. Cry/ 1-,-~ pg. -,..,,,,,-vf-··nn·: f'TJ'Wt ·-.-~-. -, 7-,,: ,,-,.,_,~?-~ 4;~;.c-"'~4_:J.,,;~~,-·~·-vr·?~;;~~.;~:7'-;:· '".'~p:r, -~J'.•"'7·--,,0·n:J·.!l1,1--1!j"'n·,,_,,,.,,~~-.rr-c,,. 7v~-.''?:1 · w;7-r"'--r=,:r~..;,,J '7!:r-4~ 17:7""-;;:"', ,.l~~..,,......pu·'"'?r"'"r.(,' '/ IY""''7'.'-V,I /"""'fJ r>rl'J~n>,,-j /'17'l'V7".'./(<'II '(( I . -+ · /T V I' " V' 7 / ' (1 --/ '-/ f ' '..II ~ .,._,,,-L_ ... :.. ''>'rn-nl',;h ;1,-7;,l-?"l""<~ 1," II '//./ "11 .. ,..~' I _#(t~ .77,//" -,~ .;-/., l// r:.1 7 '"'7~-? 7''77 ""'"./"p_:~~ -lfn-,-.;--7 , ~,,'-t:,~7 17':/ff) ....,, CTJ?f' 1- o/T""' ':r_~_' c:f.~~'/);r·'r.--~--r?fl7)~_i_-L_. _____ -1 ·· .. ! '('~:-:;r;'-u -" .... -~-·s s ''•7" :·r"/IJ /, "J:'l'i"' ·~,..,.-.,,yn,,o; 'I, IT"""T7,-.1_f -. !·---. .. --" ,,_ /'tJ" J /'P ... -.-·.--' ; ! ~"?""Y ~f·-;:,pr, _"7»>1>/~-~-"1-:!'1"1 . . . -I · . 0 ~ . .,._, · 0 0 C'/ '"l'"'a'J ·-! "'e) ':.7.1'" ~-p;?"~r .· . -. ---. I .. ---·. . ," , . -iltJO~(J /,,kp?'}. ..SI r7z,,,-,,.,,;, .,,-~-., --,,,,.,.,::w-,,,._· -,,_,...~_ W]r' 7-4~ ,'ft-e,...,.,,,.,.,::z-v·-.,,..,,..,-,-J-,;-_·x_·/ "l',T . 1 __ ,,,. , · 7 y_· . // · , I ~'f .,,,.--., " •• '-// J . .,,,• · 1 1 v-.1 ~ <~ ~\7Pr-O ;_,,. -r,o,y'-v, 7 7-r r.v/ "-17'to-H}'->;17.f1i i _,.t --,:;, .,...,z.,·· -~-' I' ,,,v,n,-?"J'?' JC?-"'_ 1, ·' ·J,··· P'>ci ?-,r(J /,./ ' I i /-.Cr 7/--r /r,,,/F;'7,/ ..,/1 · !j '1 •i17,--,£, .. ,-.,.., .9 -;,-4-,...,,,,, '~,; ~?' 'T":P"* 1_· /, i ,. u -,{_/ t.°'/ c-:i:: /I--;, ' /" -..._:.; ; "'""Z!""Y/:'J,;£-·'?7V)'-;,-'rr)..,/-~-y r:;'C'--J"11)·n /<~1-1r1,,,., ... , /' .,,.,,_,.,.,,.?' · I :I. .' ,. \_:,i ,?~ "/';:>-17~·/'"7?-77~>,~.P ~"'J1 ~·7:?-,,.,2'4 -?..,_--,,.?-y-e,.-7;;7· l--<o 1 ' ', r.J/' 6v1,, ~.~ /?_;;--,,.:A;o,7··-~--{? ·-· -_~:...P ~-/-).-z/7.--p _ . .., • :')./Jf'-,-J'J? f.._•"/\J 4-:."],,t·"'l/(""1)_ -s.,.• .·~'. ' -, ,:.. .7 >'.;f' <~ /·' .:.,£. .· . :;_ /' / . 11 / i -r.-:-; '7/"J, ~rh7'1--~:;.,;)·· bi~/ , .. z_1' pj--n~n~ 1):711 !..,.. t1 '?<IY"'' - j ?/ ·' ,-. ,(_ /I . • , .;. . '• · r---O --~,, h'7'lfi'7,f;'"';!/ ; /.--ct~,,-,7-17• 6"H-Yyn-v'/)7 -" -, ..,_ 1,: 7"11/ /i;.i-.,/ " , ' ' , 'I / , -1,""t.£JZ), ,.r,-,,, , , r rr,· 11--rr,.rtJ -v7,/,.-Y,'VV"! /(, ~?. . .,.,.,,,_,;n'??-V-::: 1 ~; / /:-:" /:1;,, V 'r,.-nG-... ~ /'"7-?:" ?71-PP'"~>?"Jtf-1--r"j;i-~ ·rl"l'!Jj 1/-;-4'1':f 'r. --; ~ _) i,7-1-,·;.::·, D ~ j 'lYr~7' C-7",,.'~rn-7-1r, ·/r.1771...-rv a-;,-r/ /? /'··rv f "vf/7r·; ~--;/~ .nr _ . ., ~ / ;" / , ,; , , ,, I ' 1 1 l ~ I ·1,-:-"Y/' r1-vv M.ff?//("'7/'r;·:'.l'i-"'-(J., . ), ·.1 .,·,_;; -:.,.;: , / A . ·! r? ·,...., ~1.., / lJ .· /" .,. ·' ' Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 E2230024 08/17/2008 10 : I 0 Ki~ COUNTY, WA $l 0 .ee SALi $0.00 PAGE001 OF 001 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 0723059001 Project File#: Street Intersection: Reference: Number(s) of Oocumcn!s assigned or~leased: Additional reference numbers are on page __ • Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. The Boe' Co an 1. Ci ofRento a Munici al Co oration LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additionallegal on poge 3) s·e Y, Sect. 7, Twp. 23 N., Rge. SE., W.M., City ofRentou, King County, Washington Portion of parcel southwest of interSection ofN 6'' St. with Logan Ave. N. 20060817000676.:: The Grantor. for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to tp.e Orantee(s) as named above, the,&bove described real estate situated in the County of King, Stale of Washington subject to Section 4.1.6.4 of the Development Agreement dated as of December 1, 2003~ between the Boeing Company ancl the City of Renton, recorded under King County recording number 2003121000163 7, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below ... , "~:. ·· ... Grante s): Cityof-:;n~nl./f(: J. :i.. · ,", . ~~~J },;j Kathy Keolke Mayor ·. \. • • •" ! .dL ~ ®duLJ!dafk..,~6 ~, / Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk lNDIVIDl/ALFO/lMOF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) Notary Seal must be within box C:Colson/Fo11TI·DEED-Cotp.Doc\ C l certify that I know or have Hfisfactory evidence that _______ _ -,.--;-;--;-:c-,-;--,-,-,...-cc,-,--c----:--:--signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses 9nd purposes mentioned in the instrument. NotatyPublic in and for the State of Washington Nota,y(Print) __ c----------- My appointment expires:·----------=-:::. Date<!: Pagel FORM 07.15.05 20060817000671;. ,:,,-, - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. !NDIVJDUA.L FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STA TE OF WASHINGTON ) SS Notary Seal must be within box Notary Seal must be within box C:Colscn/Form-DEED-Corp.Doo\ C COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _______ _ -,---,----,-,--,-,-,..,,,-c,....,--,:---,---,.---signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volunttuy act for the use8 and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print). ____________ _ My appointment expires: ___________ _ Dated: REPRESENTATIVE l'ORM OF A.CKNOWLBDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _______ _ ----------------signed this instrument. on oath stated thni he/she/they war/were authorized t<> execut• lh• instrument and acknowledged it as the-and _______ _ of to be the free and vohrntary act ofSbch party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the Instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) __ ,....... __________ _ My appointment expires:. ___________ _ Dated: CORPORA.TB FORM OF A.CKNOW£ED(lMENT STATEOFWASH!NGTON )gs COUNTY OF KING On this day of-..f-lLl~.:.4- Pagel FORM 07-15-DS . ,I Exhibit A Legal Description Project: WO# PIP GRANTO!lc Street: NORTH 6TH STREET DEDICATION 20060817000671: .:,.:, AIL THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, LYING.WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF LOGAN AVENUE NORIB WITH THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET, SAID INTERSECTION BEING 50.00 FEET WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF LOGAN A VENUE NORTH AND 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF NORTH 6TH STREET, THENCE S00"27'48"W ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 63.93FEET; IBENCE N89°32' !2"W A DISTANCE OF 4.00 FEET; THENCE N00°27'48"E A DISTANCE OF 27.53 FEET; THENCE NS8°37'! 7"W A DISTANCE OF 42.51 FEET; THENCE S88°! I '13"W A DISTANCE OF 163.04 FEET; THENCE N77°59'43"W A DISTANCE OF 68.60 FEET; THENCE N89°47'08"W A DISTANCE OF 5.38 FEET; THENCE N00°12'52"E A DISTANCE OF 6.13 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUIB MARGIN; THENCE S89°47'08"E ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 276.01 FEET TO TIIE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 4,909 S.F. C:Colsl)l'I/Fcm1-DEED-Corp.Doc\ C Page3 FORM 07-1 S-OS N 6th ST DEDICA T/O~apExhibit BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING ~ i=: t3 E3 a .... (/) i!:: <O BINDING SITE PLAN R£C. NO. 20041223000856 SE: 1/4 SE:CT. 7, 1WP. 23 N., RGE:. 5 £.. W.M. LOT 5 C:Colson/Porm-DEED-Corp.Doc\ C Page4 20060817000676.:: TR. 'F' LOT 3 - - ~ I I I I FORM 07 ·15,0S 20061212000338.:: 11111111111111m 20061212000338 Return Address City Clerk's Office City of Renton CITY OF RENTON D 40, 00 \055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attention: Document Title(s) (or transactions contained therein): I. Deed of Dedication 2. 3. PAGE001 OF 009 12/12/2006 09 :43 KING COUNTY, UA E2255009 12/12/2006 09 :43 K}~~ COUNTY, UA $t0,00 SALE $0.00 Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: ( on page _ of document) Grantor(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials): I. The Boeing Company 2. D Additional names on page_ of document. Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials); l. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation 2. D Additional names on page_ of document. Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, p[at or section, township, range) W V:i Sect 8, E \/1 Sect. 7, Twp. 23 N., Rge. 5 E., W,M,, City ofReuloo, King County, Washington PAGE001 OF 001 Portion of Tract P and Lots 5 & 6 of Boeing Lakcshore Landing BSP, KC rec. no. 20041223000856, also portion of pared west of Tract P> north ofN 61h St. Also po1tion of pa.reel southeast of intersection N gih St. with Park Ave. N. [Kl full legal description is on pages 4-7 of document. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s) 0723059001, 0886600050, 0886600060, 0886600190, 7223000105 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton I 055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Project File-#: 20061212000:'l:'IR ,: .. , Property Tax Parcel Number: See Legal Desc. below Street lntersection: Rcre!'ence Numb~r(s) of Docume11ts assigni:d or c,e!eased; Additional reference numbers are on page __ . Grantor(s): Grantee(s): l. The Boei Com an , 1. Ci of Renton, a Munici al Cor oration LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on pages 4-7) W ~ Sect. 8, E Yi Seer. 7. Twp. 23 N., Rge. 5 E., W.M .. City of Renton, King County, Washington Portion ofl'ract P and Lots 5 & 6 of Boeing La~eshore Landing BSP, KC rec. no. 20041223000856, also portion ofpal'cel west of Tract P, north ot'N flt St. Also portion orpateel southeast ofintersection N 81h St. with Park Ave. N. Tax Parcel Numbers: 0723059001. 0886600050, 0886600060, 0886600190. 7223000105 The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims. dedicates and donates to the Grantee{s) as named above,Jhc above described real estate situated in the County of King, State ofWashiagton subject to Section 4.1.6.4 of the Development Agreement datr:d as of December l, 2003, between the Boeing Company and the City of Renton, rec-0rded und¢r King County recording number 20031210001637. lN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Ai.lthorized Signatory INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary S.eal must be within box mpany Grantee(s): City of' Renton -Kd /6.,tffa._J~~:-~) ,\!·· · Kathy Qiker, Mayor f ,,, : ,. . . • \ ~;} ' [ ,~,:~. . .: ;i i ~J. /.JtJ.l..ti0' ~t/¥,·.,·;~;,. ,,/ Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk '·<.'' · ·,\ ··,< >· ·' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ... ,,,., ,,., COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that-------- ______________ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) _______________ _ My appointment expires: __________ _ Dated: Page I ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of ___ ~C=a=lil=om=ia~-----,) ) ss County of __ ~L=o=s~An=g=e=les~ _____ ,) On -~N~o~ve=m=b=e~r~1=5~2=0=0~6 ___ before me, ______ T,._,o"N~1,._,RAA=G"AS~-------~ personally appeared ALANE. DEFRANCIS igi personally known to me D proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) ls/a,e subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sl!eAlley executed the same in his/l1e<llllei< authorized capacities, and that by his-signature(&) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon beha~ of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. -------------------------------Optional ----·-·-·····--------------- rhough Iha information below is not required by law, rt may prove vafuable to persons relying on the document and courd prevent fraudu/er1t removar and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: ___ ,,D,.e,.ed,,_,.ofwD..,e,.,d.,ica"""ti"'o'-'n ______________ _ Document Date:,~N=o=n=e _______ Number of Pages: 10 /including acknowledgement) Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:. ____________________ _ Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signe~s Name: ___________________________ _ D Individual 0 Corporate Officer-Title(s):_---,-----------------------0 Partner-OLimited D General D Attorney-In-Fact D Trustee D Guardian or Conservator D Other __________________________ _ Signer is Representing:. _________________________ _ 2oos1212nnn:>.:>.R '", ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. ) 20061f12000338.:: / On , 2006, before me, Notary Public, personally appeared , personally kno to me ( or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose e is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same· ,is autl1orized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person or the entity pon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and officia eal (This area for official notarial seal) (Signature) Pagc3 Exhibit A Legal Description Project: WO# PIO GRANTOR: Street ROAD DEDICATIONS ALL THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 8 AND THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 'P' AND LOTS 5 AND 6 OF BOEING LAKESHORE LANDING BINDING SITE PLAN, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 225 OF PLATS AT PAGES 82-86, INCLUSIVE, UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20041223000856, VACATED LOGAN AVENUE NORTH, VACATED PER CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 3017, AND TAX PARCEL NO. 072305-9001, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 'P', THENCE S00°22'56"W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 'P' A DISTANCE OF 639.61 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING COURSE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 597.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°40'48" AN ARC LENGTH OF 236.32 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A,RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°38'06" AN ARC LENGTH OF 210.56 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE S00''25'38"W A DISTANCE OF 134.06 FEET; THENCE S19°30'18"EA DISTANCE OF 39.96 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING COURSE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 40.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 64°51' 17" AN ARC LENGTH OF 45.28 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE S84'2 l '35"E A DISTANCE OF 26.85 FEET; THENCE S00°53 '51 "W A DISTANCE OF 5.08 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF NORTH 6TH STREET; THENCE S88°55'30"E ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION A DISTANCE OF 25.71 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT OF SAJD MARGIN; THENCE S00°25'38"W ALONG SAID MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 8.08 FEET; THENCE N89'28'58"W ALONG SAID MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET; THENCE N82°2 I '34"W ALONG SAID MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 10.08 FEET; THENCE S00°25'38"W ALONG SAID MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 11.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PORTION OF LOGAN AVE. N. VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE 3017, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 7805250786; THENCE N89°33'2l"W ALONG SAID MARGIN AND VACATION PARCEL A DISTANCE OF 107.66 FEET; THENCE N31'16'04"E A DISTANCE OF 84.76 FEET; THENCE N00'22'56"E A DISTANCE OF 145.44 FEET; Pagc4 Exhibit A Legal Description Project: WO# PID GRANTOR: Streel: 2oos1212nnn~~R ----- THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING COURSE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 595.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°59'01" AN ARC LENGTH OF 238.68 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 535.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF22°59'0I" AN ARC LENGTH OF 214.61 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE N00°22'56"E A DISTANCE OF 506.48 FEET; THENCE N89°37'04"W A DISTANCE OF 10.04 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHJCH BEARS N87°12' 17"W; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 47.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48°35'44", AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 'P'; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE N00'25'38"E ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 96.90 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 'P'; THENCE N00°31'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6 A DISTANCE OF 11.69 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS N01°07'00"W; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 27.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88°48'53", AN ARC LENGTH OF 42.63 FEET; THENCEN0N-TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE N46°54'52"E A DISTANCE OF 14.57 FEET; THENCE N04°33'42"E A DISTANCE OF 250.02 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING COURSE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 984.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°40'00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 561.30 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE N37°13'42''E A DISTANCE OF 33.00 FEET; THENCE N52'46' !8"W A DISTANCE OF 7.50 FEET; THENCE N37'13'42"E A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE S52'46' !8"E A DISTANCE OF 8.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAJD LOT 6; THENCE S37°13'42"W ALONG SAJD EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 158.00 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING COURSE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HA VINO A RADIUS OF 984.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°40'00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 561.02 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE S04°33'42"W A DISTANCE OF 239.39 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING COURSE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 984.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°29'17", AN ARC LENGTH OF 59.90 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE NON-TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE S89°28'22"E ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 'A', ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 'P', A DISTANCE OF 50.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Poge5 Exhibit A Legal Description . Project: WOff PID GRANTOR: Street: 200612121JIJl)'.'l'.'IR ... _. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 6 OF SAID BINDING SITE PLAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 'C' OF SAID BINDING SITE PLAN, THENCE N52°46' 18"W A DISTANCE OF 50.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF TRACT 'A' OF SAID BINDING SITE PLAN; THENCE N37°13'42"E ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 5.25 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING COURSE, ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 984.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39°00' 14" AN ARC LENGTH OF 669.85 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING CURVE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1016.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1°58'41" AN ARC LENGTH OF 35.08 FEET; THENCE RADIAL TO THE PRECEDING CURVE N15°44'45"W A DISTANCE OF 19.36 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE S70°07'05"W A DISTANCE OF I 05.30 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING COURSE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A-RADIUS OF 1050.00 FEET ANDA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32°53'23" AN ARC LENGTH OF 602.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Pagc6 Exhibit A Legal Description Project WO# P!D GRANTORc Street TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF TAX PARCEL NUMBER 722300-0 I 05 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH 8TH STREET AND PARK AVENUE NORTH, BEING A MONUMENT IN CASE, THENCE S89°25'53"E ALONG THE MONUMENT LINE OF NORTH 8TH STREET A DISTANCE OF 56.67 FEET; THENCE S00°34'07"W A DISTANCE OF 29.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF NORTH 8TH STREET AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING S89"28'22"E ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 362.90 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF GARDEN AVENUE NORTH; THENCE S0l 0 06'l0"W ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 39.71 FEET; THENCE N88°53'50"W A DISTANCE OF 3.30 FEET; THENCE N01'06'!0"E A DISTANCE OF 14.21 FEET; THENCE N50°!9'5l"W A DISTANCE OF24.68 FEET; THENCE N89"25'53"W PARALLEL TO AND 39.50 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE MONUMENT LINE OF NORTH 8TH STREET A DISTANCE OF 327.85 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO THE PRECEDING COURSE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 27.50 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°35'36" AN ARC LENGTH OF 43.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF PARK AVENUE NORTH; THENCE N00°58'3 l"E ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 21.93 FEET; THENCE N45°3 l '38"E A DISTANCE OF 21.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCELS CONTAIN 91,083 S.F., 3,833 S.F. AND 3,984 S.F. RESPECTIVELY TOTAL DEDICATION: 98,900 S.F. (2.27 ACRES) l3age7 20061, 21200(1:'l:'IR __ Map Exhibit STREET OED/CA T!ONS BOEJNG LAKESHORE LAND/NG B!NDING SITE PLAN BSP: RW. NO. 200412.23000856 LLA 08-057: REC. NO. 2006DB08~00001 LLA 06-004: REC. NO. 20080510900003 SHPL 06-068: REC. NO. 20MOB2290001J NW & SW 1/4'S SECT. 8, N£ & $£ 1/4'S SECT. 7, /VIP. 2J N., RGe:. 5 /;:., W.M. BSP LOT 6 1P~ OB8660-0060 11 [ I 1 I , , , , 11 11 I I 11 ~I:!~ I I ~l:;i I I :(~~ I 1~~ I :,;l'!o I -!i~~ I "\ll! I i~:::)., -.JQ~ 1-. I I I I I I I LL.>\ 06-057 LOT 4A ··wa'r/Tst DE:DICA 170N PARCELS 8SP LOT 5 TPN 088660-0050 Pase 8: :;;: I!;! L1.A 06-004 ·q; LOTJA ~ ";{: BILLING INVOICE EG0004 DEPARTMENT: CED -Planning AR: Eden Invoice: BILLING CONTACT Mark Clement BOEING COMPANY THE PO BOX 3707 MS 1W-09 Seattle, WA 98124 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA15-000749 17 Printed On: October 13, 2015 Prepared Bv: Vanessa Dolbee Kenton® 1055 S WA 98057 TRANSACTION TYPE Transaction Date: October 13, 2015 PAYMENT METHOD SUB TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $2,472.00 $2,472.00 Page 1 of 1 CI FRENTON Date: c/ /:; -/S ----~---Devempment Senrices Planning & Zoning 235-2550 ·,(J aOJO Boeing Contact: //'L \ 1 :·' • i}".:(\\ Organization#::.,.: l ~-L~ \ ·/ ~~ :1 \" : \~ 1.:· ( Appeals & Waivers Binding Site Plan/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Fees Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Routine Vegetation Mgmt. Shoreline Substantial Dev ·--' 000/345 .81.00.03 ----000/345 .81.00 .04 000/345.81.00.06 ___ _ 000(345.81.00.Q7 000/345.81.00.11 ___ _ 000(345.81.00.12 000/345.81.00.15 ___ _ 000/345.81.00.16 ---- Approved For Payment: ______________ _ Boeing Representative Signature 0Splnzn201 7 /31/92 City Staff Authorization Project Name:,\ :(7."" ,.\..-L~':,· LI J.tf. F~1:\. ,,,"-t_ un \ 11\c, Work Order/Function---------- Site Plan Approval 000(345.81.00.17 , Variance Fees 000/345.81.00.19 JI·.,., .._,1-~l~.j-;{,-.-r~O Planning/Zoning Misc. 000/345.81.00.20 1 Maps (taxed) Photo Copies Publications (taxed) Postage Tax Other (Description) 000(341.50.00.00 000(341.60.00.24 000(341.60.00 .24 000/05.519.90.42.0l 000/231.70_,00.00 J! ,, ,~,:: .t ~ ·,,~ ---- ---- Amount j :J, .. ,,,, . ·l1~ •. I 1 Totai!_t_11 =-....---''~-"-; __ v __ liliij