Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 01'> I CITY OF RENTON Development Services Planning & Zoning 235-2550 (-, "-.1 Boeing Contact: ['v \ ( '/ \;, C1c Iy\( cd Organization #: V", C'f' I P ,. -:\:\. ( Ito '1 U -. \ Appeals & Waivers Binding Site Plan/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Fees Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Routine Vegetation Mgmt. Shoreline Substantial Dev 000/345.81.00.03 ___ _ 000/345.81.00.04 ___ _ 000/345.81.00.061, 000/345.81.00.071;-,1)-11-) -. C-c-' 000/345.81.00.11 ___ _ 000/345.81.00.12 000/345.81.00.15---- 000/345.81.oo.16~1~ill; .(i/1 (~ /J~A/ln Approved For payment:,_",/!11'-"~'-'~'--_-h I .. ~,--_____ _ Boeing Represen tive Signature OSplnzn2017/31/B2 .. Date: \ -t (I ' 15 .0033 City Staff Authorization Project Name: A ) ',)'1' (I A 1'5 'I c-] I J\!hx I Work OrderIFunction ________ _ Site Plan Approval 000/345.81.00.17 Variance Fees 000/345.81.00.19 PlanningiZoning Misc. 000/345.81.00.20 Maps (taxed) 000/341.50.00.00 Photo Copies 000/341.60.00.24 Publications (taxed) 000/341.60.00.24 Postage 000105.519.90.42.01 ___ _ Tax 0001231.70.00.00 Other (Description) -I/'b (u;:1. ';/C,rD Aoct# Amount L--_________________ _ . --------------------- N • <D ;:; . N • <D I< • I :§' 2 . li' -• ~ • 1111 III . I i I ~ Q , ~ , m u ""'" ,---- \ ;~~--z~' I r or- 5-4~- o"""" \-.:~-r II i :aJ W'l" :lI l ,-: ~ ~ jtJ . i I ~co ~ ~~~I ~ t __ I .... • !"' .... ,!G<_~.CI...,..,. _ ICI ... " lOTS ~ ~ ~ JANUARY 6, 2016 =1"·200 o 200 .;..00.J '~ 400 c~ ::I;~', 6 I' LEGEND 'i N. 10TH STREET / =::::::::::::::::::::1' "'-. ('-.J ••• ': '~ ~ r:: :. . = =~ =. :;:;., co ljl' :&" 4,1\ ", ',/ ._~' I ,.;.." + %\ » ~ (I ~ I ":'" w, l\ 4-\46 ~i; THE LANDING! ' .' I::; , .J 111 ~-60 Q: 4-79 r4-77 ~ 4-~B; 11 4-61 4_, PROJECT 00 m L SITE ~ ro,st?; il ol r t~~~~f=====N.~6T~"~ST~. ==:: lO-469Q GO-20J 5-407JW~ 10-7 N. 6TH STREIT ""--;;~", \.. 5-27 . 1 b ~ 2: Z ;i ;i . -Z Lei • Z ..,:, "-' >-w w w b ~]{ ;: " " " '" LOT 8 [§ ~ ~ ~ ~ :; ~ 3 ~ 3 ~ iJ:l ~T o ~ ~ II'] N. 5TH STREET 5-43 0'::: b \J~ r II n Il r--r rr =====~ I 5-401 PROJECT SITE x, ~\\((tclJ UUL ~""~":J, , J~~~:!i6 _!--t-,_, , .. ---~ ~s-=.. ',""" OCf...::m ....... nDmH'lI1lJl(S-""RQI<.OPRO.lfCl rA k !li-IIDEINO° ~ _. ,-,-'::"_. \ I=! g Ioi ~ H l N ~ q. ~ ii· <no '" • ,02" !!!~5 ,~U~! <0 i! § i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; §h~lh~ 0 • qP~'""·dlr> . 0 ~ •• hn!~n Unho <D e >-. ~ ~, 1111111 0 a ~. e ! §I ~m III 0" ® ~8' : : ii: : =>- ~! • IIII11 I I I I I N • ~ o , N ·1 •• :..-!u illil i fa Ic',,,,,,'UL-:; ,', \' 'I ~ I I I I ~ I ~ I 8 ~ I I I I I I " ill! Ii ~, \ )\ ) ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ % ) '\ \ \ (I \ ( \ \ '. I : iii , ' , \ I ' .. i 0 II , \ I i , , < , ~ ;; . N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ I \ I i ~ I " l< \ I , ,. , ~ I , I 'I , ·f ' i nr~~~ iii i N i ~ • ~ !I l ~s ~S s ~ ~ ; ~h)" ;:; • N • ~ II ~ . ~f ' ;:; 0 I §i m~ : 0 :I: • ~ ~ "II~~~ u_ • ~ ~~DO D~H Si" • f w~ iii!: ::> 1:5 ih~ c.;> ..: ... 01 .. ~, :!.~~ no.tJ«> jjj~1.1I STORM DRAINAGE REMOVAl PlAN OJ.aw .. 6_ IV! "'cOl_' lWI1.1I (I)£l!C;7l1_!'1.Ym.fIEUJI,Il£S--,\f'R~Clf'ROJECl C23 -... _. ~~~J """ SITE OS-YO r~ CMlIAOSTtR RDffllN, MAR 1 4 2016 CITY OF RENTON L .. "'N" t IKnz 1I ~ .. ~~ 7 IL/aIl ... , Ii .... ,,~ r FU<lI~EO CRJ 20 1-.. -+-120 . . I t~;r,;L~:' w .. ···" l' ~........ . .... ; , '" ".-'" . ',,"" 00 WT-()(II. Y~LVE ~~ULT i IN~ lB' (Nw) _ 14.~ ,NY IT (:~ : ~i~; i INV If (E) .. 1~86 ,NV 12· (SW) -1:1.103 1 J I..F" 12' DI 0 (I.57l1: 5 ..... INV 12' (5) .. 1:1.".' .................. , ................ , ...... . '~~)~ .. ~~) : ;~~ .~~_~~"'"~ Yl.IJI.h o ....... .1. l.Q •• ~[ • ..1,~.: .. "'.1...~ ... 1·10Ill.. . ...... ~~ ~~S~~AIILa .... 2 .. l.~ 0 " 1~lb. SOUIi-60' OIA JIV 12' (N) .. 1~1l "'101 _ Z1.~6 ii' INV 12"" (5) ~ n.~ 4.LF e' DI 0 0.50111(>2) -" --.--. .f-_. "~:~:i~: ~i'~:--i-.. -.... -.---~!!55U~BL.E PI.M1'-.... 12 LF 1Z' H~-TYPE 11-95' OIA ~ . 0 O.:;(!lI:. Rill PE~ DET"'L '. ..~ -10 I~ __ ·L. __ +~ bWS;~9PrRO>sOCTr:: --:~ :~: m: ~\~---i . ; INV 12' (E) .. 11.D i 'NV e"" (N) _ 1~44 ' , INY 12"" (N) .. 10.71 i .' (.2) 15 _. __ ._.L. ___ ._J. ___ ?_IF-';Z::_~~_~J~~ _ .. ____ !_. __ L __ ;.. __ 15 i, i, ~i RTU 10. 50MH ge' DlA ~ IF 12"" DI D 2.75l1: , ;~. RIO! PER DETAil • • , INV 12· (5) .. 10.67 -20 ' • , lNV 12"" (N) .. 7.52 -20 ,I, ," ~ '="'~~1r \ I " ~-~+-1-ll+----HJir " " 1+1IIH+II-III " 10 ... -OZ53l1:DPE 10 I llt;;::j:Jru II WHl01. V:,~V: V:I~~ : t ,''''' 12-(Nw) _ 12.13 ; I IN~ 12' (Sw) -12.13 ~.. • II lioN 12' (5) _ 12.11 INV 12' (N) ~ 12.05 INV 8" (5) _ 11.21 o 110 ~ ~~~ +·-t .............. 1·····+··+++······1 1053-16. SOldH-60' 01. I ~Ild 21.~5 INV 12' (5) _ 11.~"'._~ ,''''' 12' (N) * 11.g... f INV 12" (w) _ 11.19; . 1 105 ... -16. SoldH-48' i -----1 'iNv 12~ ~~) : ~l:~--Jl i IN~ S· (N) ~ IB.9~ ; -" " L_'N~ 12~ 1~)LF~ 1~'~LJ OUf'lEX SUBldERSIBLE PUldPU T"1"P£ 1-!I5' DlA Rild P(R ocr ... -20 IN~ 12' (E) _ 11.00 'N~ 12' (5) ~ 7.~1 V e' (N) _ 111. .... I~ ~ .. , -w " -'" 20 20 " .. ····IQ4!!-15. ~IE INI.£T ..... -. ···1 ··1 15 10 1.1-... RIY ~ 21.~ t IN~ 12' (S) ~ lo.~ INV S' (w) _ 16.78 t;-IN.V S' (N) ":' IB.~ __ LF S· H~ 0 :1.07% 1047_;6. CONCR"ETE INLET ; RIM _ 2 ••• 5 I+-U-!.-...JNV 8" ('II) • 16..96. ___ .1-__ ...J._._ i INV ... • (N) ~ 17.U i INV S" (E) _ 16.96 . If" e' HOPE 0 ~90ll: w o HIJRE-719 .. -10"'3-16. stIWH-48· DlA·l··-1 0 SIC\'tIROL sourn RIM. 21.57 INV 12' (w) _ 12.94 i IN~ 12' (E) • 12.~ W/SAF"E ORAIN INSERT 11111 21.10 ; -5 1 ,NV 8" (E) • le.27 '-~ ,,-", . '''[ -, " 10+00 .,+(]]+12.55 9+60 10+00 11+00 11+50 10+00 10+92.76 ~LEq'!2I1.T~~.~~GH 1056 16 ~ ~ .. 29'!2I1"T~~.?~~GH URE 789 ~ ~~'}11_~T~I~]UGH 1043~16~ i FlNIS>lEJ) CR.o.oE --I... If' FlNlSllEtl CR.o.oe:: ' , n EXISnNG GRAOE i fI'IISHE? CRAo[] "'I-+H-----~' --"'----' --_ . .j......--......j.-----•. _--'----: ---: _._-'- ~IS~NG GR~OE" I' i iEXIS~NC ~RADEfP'! • 1 '" --r------t---+----+-~~--:q-'" ,-+----.. "".--] 20 , ,~ , ", +1"101 +I " 40 Lf 8' HDPE D 0.73l1. 15 I·····i ............ i. ....... j ... -_I 15 UM-720 Sl<\'tIROL NORrn w/SM""E DR.o.IN INSERT wi .~~.~ ~~l~ ;6.49j-.. -tl 10 1061-16. cONCERET INu:T I_-M lr ~~ : ~~~_ .. _cl 5 INV ~. (N) .. IB.20 INV lZ' (E) _ 16.10 -_bdo' 15 ,.--f~L .. ~-t-: ....... - 211 LF lB' ,HOPE: 0 0.19% 1059-1& •. ;" INY Ie"" (5) • 14.39 ..... RIM _ 2:1.05···· INV la' (W) * 14.eo INV lS' (SE) _ 1 .... 50 5 wi +IC·····.".,,- i INY 1e"" IE) .. \ .... l9, ii~i~~::;:::;::·"i j Ii + ,~'" _"'~. "' I 29 LF' 18" flDPE~ .......... ~.. oo.n%;···· o ~~ 1';/1~.; 1 .... 40 ....•......... 1.... ..+ ................ ~ ...... _ .... .1 ............. 1.... . INV 12-~~ : ~~~g .. INV le-(N) 1 .... 40 INY IS' (Nw) .. 14.BIi " " +--j '-!4-1 " " t··--··':---U. I INV 12' (N~ • ~i:~ 1 INV 12,'215(S): 12.11 • ; INV. .1205 r' 1~~Vl!. ~~~ • 1127 l~i LF 12' H.~P..E ... !. .. ~".6.~ ....... T ... j. _ .. . ----l-~-·l-_---fl 0 -, f-I --'---'---'1 -, INV 1~· (E) • 14.95 I -,I . -, ~u !I~ ~I~ ~~ ~EL ;;:~:~~ , ;""-",.n.,,, 'MA" 142016 ilNV 12" (SL:. .. ~~+.. I t"\ -----r;·;;:··~~PE 0 0.00% , Ei CONTAINIIENT-2 URE-7SJ. FU. Rill O[T"'L -" I ·1· ",,,' ", -.. , I, _..i ~u ~~ 10+00 10+61.79 ~~ -;;!1?1 T~I~_?UGH 1 061-16~ DATUM NOTE, JIUfC!i I'm'NIlD USIG IQtl a .IS lIE VElII"K:I.I. 1:\lJLIIL TO IDNEIIT 10 MMI ae K» 3.5511 rm 10 .IU. EllVAlDfS. 10+00 11+00 12+00 EX CB THROUGH 1056-16 SixE_ H_ 1'.20' Y.I''; rti-BIIEING' lfi -@ lJ+OO !O\ ~-1-"" -~s-=... __ .. _ ..... lSt:HlJ) 9+50 WI-~Ol SCfU_ II-1·"2 I' ~~ ,0+"." 10+00 .,...."n" IIR~~7RI'i '"' SHORELINE PERMIT MARCH 01, 2016 1..l;KltJHE' I PROJECT SlTEOS-YO ,,--. 'Uu. ( OF REtrrON' ~ 0J.01.15 C299 C28 . ZU.70 W m , ; 70 tF IS· DURASLOT i ,MAJN a 0.= " i : (KOOHT VARlE'S) ...... "--~.-.. -...... --............ -..... -.-.-1:5 1S· .otlM'TOR '" ·.--·--i-·---·L-_._... .. .. _.] 10 ~R"'SlO~~~liw i i OU~ASLOT EN~ CAP- 1063-16. CONCR[T£ INLET ..... l... . ........... 1... ...... ,1:,~,;;,l.1.~,.~D ...... .:. .. .. , H_1~;~::t;~o_--i ______ i_l_. __ ~ ~~:4,r:: ,,= +--,--, 0 INV 12" (NIV) ~ 17.80 I '"' ... ,,' -" .. ro ~ i il~ s~ '-'If' '"'''' 11+00 12+00 1063-16 THROUGH 1069-16 (1\ SCALE. ~ ,".zg' v-,"oo5' cm-LClXI RECEIVED MAR 1 4 ZOi6 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION IN COMPUANCE V!1TH CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS BY DATE BT DATE En' DAn: DATUM NOTE: SHORELINE PERMIT" "rr ~~~~~:w~ MARCH 01, 2016 ~CWL l«J~fWlOAl1ELEVAIlCJIS. ... - . ...... -... -.. ---0 .<CCt>'1"A8l.IT'f """' OJm_lI -...-STORM DRAINAGE PROFILES .)«1886 RI WJll.11 ........ --_ ~11 '* 'l> ... IU:MlM:........-.a~ 6;..s .... u. m III1EINO-fl --:,"":=-.............. =." !I)[lM;;1J1IoiUfl.ll;l!f\.fjEIJ1ItI1£S-Io"ROh'AClPI!OJECT C300 C29 ~ ~ -_ '" C3.m." SlTE OS-YD 11)«1866 "'-10' crw.. IIASI[I! R[)I'Il;f;, .... CI5-.lP!OI ...... -cJOO DESIGN CRITERl<I: UJ fWW OF COO_TED SlORIllfATVI TO SI.NI'l.II!T SEWER UIIITED TO o.z crs/ACI!E. b) CIIWIi«Nf fOR FUll SIIJW) IE lO.iDl c.o<JDl). <lFIDIII!lF$.IHI.ll!TilISfBECCIl.lttIIDAND!!!POfmI) 10 lONG COIMTY. I01lUZlIf; F1.OW IIElEII !liI'1.lJZ[[l AND RESffiAlU RtIIlINIi. d) \I!lt.IM OF .... 1'01 \6.lWCE 9EFORE GON: BIIo: 10 SI!lIIII SIUlll EJ[ ClU\.U.Tm BI' t.NJNG 9I!E lK SUItFJC[ 1\15 BID t:t.f./INElI (RMN£D ON) AND DO.ICIi .... IDI IllS PASSED THRILCH TREljCH 10 ~I'E TM£N AU. Ctl'COllO SNflN!'Y .J CRE£N ~ IIOIIMO!U.I ON lO SGill IIIJII)I'F S CON: TO SIOI!I!I S'I'SIEM. f TIlE 00CEN:f SI'l1 !'USHBIJTTOIIIS/ClIIIJ\.1lllll-E RWIIEACONWlJ. TURN ON N(l THE GRUN BEACON WIll TUIIN Off. If" lHfDE-ICIM: P\JSH BIJTTOIIISN;IJV,O,l[lIA BUJ[ 8EICON 'Ill. Tl.RJj ON NI,l IH( CREEN 8EICON I'll. l\.0I OfF. WID IIlE S'!STDI .u.ntlIIAu;;.tUI SMItIIES 8Ia( TO SlOI!W THE !!1M: BU(:ON WU TURN OFF IHO M GRUN EI!'ACOI< WU TIJRIj ON. f 01 I 8 1 8 1 °1 I I I I I EIO!.INLWl'I' IoREA F'OR S'tSl[lj SCHEw.l1c--------l IImJED 10 ctlIITROL PANEl. DOOR. m I !UJIlERfU ....... VES TO fWI[ VAlVE Ml(:,\TE CI,ItR£Nt STS1EIoI srA'l\JS. SlAM PIJl1 IDII. B£./CON tGH!S 10 I I I I I I I I I I I ~ _ YJOtVE SlArus PLOT !.GIl: ~RED:VAoI.'IE= GREIN: VALVE OI'tN GIIU)I1!iEIICON1.Dfi: , / B'YPASSUPSTR£.I,II ..... -. \ • • • IIlRWL SIl'IRY F\DII NlCl.TOR ~ __ > DlSCIWIGE TO SlORII Y (C[1ItJIRtIER) -';;O(vrwaT RED BE.IICON WIT: FUEL SPl.L. HlIC.\1DR BLUE 9EItON LOO: DOO~ TO WMART SEWER -~ / ~ """'" SUi:f.l,C[llI/AI<IS(rrP) .- ------l ~ -- I I I v~"" .. "" I I I f\.OII'5I'lJTTUIco,IDIBASl>I ~m_ 0 __ APRON A-IO " J I r~~~ON / APRON A-9- " ~~ TU AI~ 8\'10~?_ ......... 18\'1G-1 ,---'---'-""", ~ ~""'" -, I.E.VEl. SE!§OI1 (10.000 ~ I I I I I I I I I L ______ ...J IMG-' 1/ , Mt S .,.. .. ~~~ ~·t I ~NWl.VE ..... ... 0I5CH\RGE 1t.l SWTART SOlD! \. -------------- ---- A-9.!i A-IO DE-ICI~G/FUEL SPILL DIAGRAM AND DOOR FRONT GRAPHIC~ ill ~ C295.C2'l6-L1;5(l(I A-9'" 1.-10 STOItW ~ IS 5[JWIAl( f1!CII R[Sf OF _ ~ rti-SIIEINO· COMPUANCE 'MTH CIT"( OF RENTON STANDARDS "IT DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER SYSTEM OPERATION sroRII'MTElI IS CWIrIUl m;II suru; Nl NfJ/f# Al0 ....., ~ 10 M IMRSDI w.t.YE '<001.1 AGI!EDI!VaWISNCIIIYIUlOli 2. STOR\IWA1ER FlOWS 1Im.IGII TIlE FUa SPIll. n:E5 Ail ot AIO: VAlVES IMI-l .t ~O_, loRE NOf!I,IAUI ~ (.\ [;RUN !VO)II 5 G/) l-TIE n.n SI'l1 lEIS II 11.: lWEI15IlII IUtVE VAIU I:I\'£RTS A SPU 10 nt: nn !Df1JMIDfI 'IOIJI.l; An SI'U. 1II .Ii AND run. spu 1II AID. WY!:S IM-Z It 1N1G-2 All[ NJRIoIOUT -A $IQ.£ O/ERWICT SPIll. PI..I$HI!!JI1't IS I,OClI[I) ~ 0CIi srAU. EtIUPI'ED f1lI A fOOLI) /IRtWl. ~ ~ OF TIl: E»EIICDC'f SPll. P\JSH iIIJTfOIj WU lURN CIT A CREDI IIOaIII II(! T\RN ON A REllIIEACIIN. fOR 5W..l A!l 'Ill. WlS£ ~I'E 1m_I AKl ~ ""l\'E EMt-2. IWUI. ""111'[01 !IF lHf OI(RI;[II;\' 5PU PU5Il IlIITOII FOR ST.ou AID Wll CUlS[ \\loLl'[ IMG-l N(l1;l'EH VAlVE ~1G-Z. F\.DW Ii'Ll BE 0MlITIJ) 10 nt: fIIIl ca<TNhUEN'l 'AULT. • I!EtI !IEI£ON IIIIU. T\IRN 011 AND IHE GREIN !IEACilN WR.l TlJRN orr. ~ UI«)[II IQI,ItL OPIJIATrJN STOIMIllDl IS DIREt:TtlI TII/Ol.Ui TI£ FIJil SI'l1 0MJ/5DIj lEIS '10 11£ DE--I:IC DMJISUI lfIS. S. 11£ rtJII) lIYU SOGlfI ~ lJ£ fU1 WKr.oHlENl 'PaT Wll N]IJ'f THE DI:S STSTEOI or Ml/Ol. /CCUIIlMTI)'( mE CPS Ol.-IIIATEII SEl'NlAIDR SI'I!MJ) BE: E.\'ACI.IO.IUI Of FlJ[l rou.DWING A SPU. 011 F IIONIHI.Y INSI'ECroNS J;(lQ.TID lHE PRESENc[ or fin. TIl' API SEPAAlTOR SHOU.D IJ[ ClfNI£D .IS1IJI A SPll 011 F II)IIlI(.T ~ NXAn: lJ£ ...,.,. ""- A OE:-D«; I'IJSH IlJ!l1lIj IS lDCO.TIIlAT 5INJ.S All AHIll0. ~..tcrW1lJj Of lJ£!IJIlDN Wll lU!Ij ON A (Ut: 8£ACON 1lJRI.H; OfF lJ£ GI!EElI ~ Ira:II~ lIMT DEI:N> f\.IlIIIII IS I)IlING JU mE s.wtoRl' SEWl:~. Fl)II STIIU. .... V.lI.I'E IlW-J WIlJ. ClOSE AI(l 1lW-. Wll OPEN. fl)R STIIU. lD. \!lOt\'[ lNltl-l n.L Il.C$( AI(l MtI-<! Wll 1lPEH. e. ~T\.(M''o'CtUIE!S-'II11JU:.oo1J'\I. 1I'JIHTJ£N'!DII'OWUI£NIAICISltIRII IXI.J.£CTJlN S!STDI Wll ~ TO BE f\.l.ISItEIl or RESlJ.IIt [lOCIII; FUJO. y/tVES !IY!J..4 INJ/OII !I'Il~ WU STAT MN l.tfT!. A PRESCImIED I'IlI.l.IWE Of ... lI:R IS OISCHAIIGED.\HI) l.OGOOIlIr f\.OW ~mHS; !'VI_I AND FIIlo_l. TI£ PIlESCRIBED I'IlUAIE 00I.Jl1ES TO TI£ FJ!'ST fUJSIf EVENT, IWROXlIMID.T I\,IIIXl ~ F'[JI >IN,\.. 9. I\£SAlmR"tn.c:-IVDlI1J.II[S[TAFl[JI1I£~'o'CtUIE0f1r.l1Ell1S.~ NfJ SDlJA SIOIW. TOy/t¥ES 1lW--4>HlJ/OII MH TO CI.D5£_1OIl'I£S !r>'J-3_/OII !I'IIQ_3 m OPOI FlJlIIII RE5UII($ IhIIOIX;H NORWI.. STIlIMIlTEII P>lTt1. 10 _STORUWATElIFlJlIIIIIS!lllErTIDmlHEf\.IlIIIII5I'IJTT[I!co,lOl_, 1I£WIo.TEII OUIoIJI"tfl.(lll.~or1l£1-'rbIIIP9ICFUlI'.15~JUTIE~Pt.<:t 0l.-.A1EII SEi'IWo"\tlt It lI£R( ARE IWIJIoU.Y OPERATID co,n: 'ntVES BEFtlR£.\HI).IS1IJI"fII[ 0l.-"MlDt SEPAAATDR 50 THE OIL-WATrR SEJlWlUII CAN BE ISIJU,TID. 12. lI£R( IS A fII'DROCI.'IOOH SD60II ~ 001H lI£ SIl)RWA1[)I CPS 1JIl-u.TEII SEPAAAlOII N(J II£SOICl1IRTAPlSO'MAmt 1II£lI1IEIE:ISAfU1SPllTllAl"INCR£.ASESTHEOl.IDUfj £mO srn.IIAlOIIlIE 5<NSOII wu. aJl5E 'AI.YE _, AND Mil-I NfJ 0PEI<!r09-1 NfJ MII-2. 111[ CPS Ol.-u.IDI SEJ'AAf,TOR srnstIIIlS lIE 8\CIC ~ IICTh'AlX)N FOR THE fU1 ~--IS. "jj lI£ t'>UfT or • SPU lII.IIING. I'OII"Ul I;lIlAGE ALI. \Ii\lVE$ till BE Cf'ERATIII -.w.LY. It. lI£ fU1 (XlNT/HIENT VI.l.l.T !\IS A FUIll IDU SO!SOR mIT tmFB M ncs STSTEOI or /CCIIIollt..\l[fUIIOJjTl£'II\Ul.T. nt:FUB.CCINWNIoEII1w.w5l()t.U)1J[~FOII "'TEII ACC1.U1.IIAlXiN MIl ... m ~TID Sll AS TO PRESDtYE CONTAIIIIIENT t:N'ACm". 11£ FlJn CIlIffAINMENl V.lI.lT SHOWl OC MCIIATED or fUEl. FOUDWING • SPILL 15. 11£ 1JIl-""U! SEPNWOII Dl5OWIG£S ro M mJIIWl.IDI 1It[Al"IIBlI VJU.I WIICI1 PRCJoU5 DHI«:E!l UJDt OUWIT. 11£ ~ SIQU) BE NSP(tI[lI BY A Q)I![tH Ii'!W>UI SEIM:E PR!JI>QJI ON 1M -""'!1AS5. ~ IM"I" 011 IMY NUf NWlIO II( mvaD I.NI/UIUY. MEDII, IS csr FtlII tM1AN::Ell l1!E/.TVENT. 10. THE STORIII1.1EII llI5CI-W!CES INTO THE I'IW STA"IIJN WET ww.. 11£ P\l1IP STAIlJj IS A ruux fISTAI.L\."IIJN !11TH TIE PUll' POIIT FOR EACH PIV' SET AT DNE-~ TI£ l00-liN! P{AI( fUl9 I_my EWIIOI.OO JU n£ 5-"f£AA FUIQ. 11. lit: PIMP !rn.lXIN CONTRoL STSTOI II\S 5 SI;T1"N)S: A. I.E.A[IP\lUp(Jt. B. LKlI'UW'DN. t. ~LM1.AI.AA'II. 0. I'tM'SOff • (. lDWIDUlJX:1\llIIAHIl~ IS. P\III'SAI.~l(JjllElfAIlROl,[. !IIOa.f'POIr[JIIS~TOTI£N'IIONSTSTEOI lIfIOI.Gt A I'QR"lIIlU GD6.ITtIl 19. Il£P\IY'STI;OCllf1\SVEarAL/Jl\l!l"ACON5.tREENISCQIXI.oHCI!EIlISAIRIoI. lI1E£l(:S ~~TI~AIRIoI~ru~ ,- 20. O£O(AI(I ISfj IIE1I1Ul. lIEfm::E _ TlECElIIIIRMX MAR 1 4 2016 SITE OS-YO tor ASI' ..... T "*"VI"" SI'I~ ....... F\lII -~~ -= '" (7I1P. 18" =[.ICIi .... l \ iISEEJOMDETJ,Jl~ .OM \ I (l(h-n -1 L --IT . i< h_n __ t--:- _ F1I<15~ CONC~rn: 4 ;:,~.\c: ,,,;; S ; t" -"I ~/2} . '.4" (. .•... :1 '" • 3\1" (Don "0 x J(l. (".,., ...... TYPE I CEMENT CONC PAVEMENT (9" YARD) CD ~ , . ,: ... ,,' . ' .. " .. ' 'v..~' II ruu;)" txlHCI!EIt _/Nt.7IOII£SH 950. P.'" n. n.< .. ~ IIlr. on! ~IJ"'" YAAD TYPE II CEMENT CONC PAVEMENT (14" YARD) W -- TYPE 2 ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION r3\ ~~;~~~T ________ _ ____________ J PAVEMENT CUT SECTION fs\ ~ro~ \eJ '" CQHmACnQN JOINT 1!4":tl!lS" BAtKER ROO ~AN.SIllIi ! _cctiSTRIICnON 0NT ~L~~~(~)@ _ro= _ """'''"'''' ••. = ....... --. .. CON::.-m:NC>CItOUT CONSTRUCTION JOINT DETAIL -au -~ NOT 10 SCN.E C501 D.C."""..... ir-su:.llINT11V""-@ ,. CR<P. le"~ ~". Ji-,~·n=. ---. . '. =S ., Y jI."c. i' .... 1 ML :,-:. . .. " '",' ;]2:,~ ~ J(l~ ~,' " ~.-.l ,'0 • xr (".,., CFRP BoIlS 0 ~" ".0 ........ HOlE ,N COOIC~rn: AND GIIOlIf DCl1r<l. lITO t1IIIJ..ED tQ.E CONTRACTION JOINT DETAIL f9\ NOT nj-SCAlE EJ W><OIE 1NDIt:O.1Hl. SO'ClIf ANI) _ """"NT \§J rnTOPOf"JD.".. --.1·~'~----lT _________ 11 ". .~ .... : . , '" " EXISnNG JOI~ DETAIL ~ ro "'" '" • """ (D_G' ,'0. ",," (D_'~, CFRP !IAR5 0 " ".c. ....... ..;u:"CQOICRITE""t:ROIII DOWEl. 11<TO O"M.lllI HOLE (iO\ ~ "0 (1-'1'" .... ) CAP_ ."'·0" O.C. ONE 0-. ~ t, .. ~ ........ j} -: ' ~ )?1QTp~o,*jo Qffl&O!f~ ~El151Mi!lA5[ t:OlJRSE11)l000:~ HARDSTAND TRANSITION NOT ltI SO<.!: s· CIllSllEO """"""'l[ -- 11 '"'' TYPE 1 ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION 13 NOT TO SCN.E VTJUTTWI.l1.T ,., '~o_.YOJlTTP f' 0 iICTTOW. ~" ClR TTl' .... LOOOC 0 ." DC CORNER REINFORCING DETAIL 14 _ro= [ft·w.~ >'~~-........ 5_" '"" .-' ... ~ '~-.(: - .".'. ~ ~, CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB © NOT TO SCN.E C501 ~ -~ '" CfI!P. Ie· ==-s".~~:C." _ .• \., ... ~r-:-~.ooIfOClM.@ ,nL ~ ... ~~""" -r ~." .. ,.: ==:.". s: .. '" I NOTES: 1. AU. CfRI' (CAAIJON nBEl! IURIRCID f'l..ASTI:) RDIIfl)RCI/I;; SIIIoU.. Sl.1lSFY 1oC\ «Il.1R-!16 .1M) JICI ~.$-{)!. 2. c.o.ROON flBERRDNfl)RC1I.cSlW.! ~YE~ _II!1!SI"C ~Of 1!!'ow ~sr. SP1.I:E IDI:1lIS Sii1U BE _~ 40 Qt.R 0W01[ITRS. -- ~ _~cM=~==1:Fi=n== , " -, ". JI)" (_, • '. • • . .• " " ~ "0' lI)" (D_", \......1.. ~::"".tf"o.C-(M<IJ. DDII'll.~":........ouI -~~ ~~- ~ COICR(I"[.IM) SlJiICRII.DE P1IOP£lITCi..IM) F'1IU'MII.1IlN PER PlllJJEC1 """"-•. CUAUTY CONlROL NI[l ASSI.IIANCE 1I[OUIR£I,1ENTS PER PRWEI:T SPECR:.l11ONS. RECEIVED lIN eO"PCANeE 1111" CIT RENTON STANDARDS MAR 1 4 2016:: :::== ~~A~ION JOINT DETAIL (EJ) @ ~ BY 0/1.1[ __ ~y~~,c.MrLAIc. UCIf\IL (bY ~~D~AND TRANSITION © SliQB~LlliE.PERMIT BY 0/1.1[ __ rvfAR~~1~!2mEDN ~CWL ... -.. -... .,.. -.. -... ® AC(:[PT.-.enJlY •. """"" t .. " --~Ni:tI~fi~1itSION W:s.4~IB85 JlFI rom.16 0II1G ISl .... II.DI11.N~'a~ .. Tn 0l.0'.1I 1£ ~5-=" WE\I ,,, .....:....:..:. o<.IIIIEI.O· _ .. ---to 0>.0111 !llONI<1J7_flJ;IIItIIE~/l.ClPROJ!rI C501 C35" ~ _ 0l.0111 SITE05-YD S _ WW\B85 'Ii' CIYlIl\SlU: ROI\tIN, "fA ~-API/ON-A-C501 I·"·'~~ .... ,-",._., ~= "-'n '-'tl ITFI11 I PI! t ULI~ ''''·,_1 L I 0",' ...... 1 ~ ~~-=-=".~"""I ~~ ~=::'=:"l::::~~!:_ "-..... ..... ____ ....... :'m §1~':: BIIJIIIIN='"-3491 180 "IIIlI: sa STUlI.fU(. I'l.Nf! 0; SIIn S2II5. NEENAH R-3491-HL FRAME AND GRATE (T\ m ~.1."'" ~~~'.,~ D I I "1>" I-In rrrll q' ! I ULJj O~"< ,._, ." •. " ....... , 1 F '~"-'=t-r""r '._111 ,,~,,_I I I " l'-w'_'~1 ""1_1 s; :~=-..:";O"'~-(.....:J < "''' ". ~;ZF:I:",.~ ziKf------ "MCIlt: sa Sl!'IIJClIJAIII I'l.Nf! ON SI£IT SZB1. NEENAH R-3480-A FRAME AND GRATE m ~'IIEIN'O· l r'vr ,.-, ..,.-;---.. .... 'I~!~ "I(JI[: !EE smJCJUW. PVfIS 011 SII[[f SlM. NEENAH R-3491-HG FRAME AND GRATE m ~~~·(=I Ilggg~ 00000 CJCJOCJO CJCJOCJo 00000 OO~ ..... _"""'''''''''./ DDDOG 1"'1>"-"',·."...., .. ~ ""'~ ......... Ii ~."",.-'~ FI""'" [ ..... 1-.-_ >/'·1'_) "1>"";-) ''''" '-':=1 r:r t-' ,,~ 04-1 Jt~ ttJ 11;"-' II --"-(""-1--__ ,.,.,_1 __ "/'·'_1 .. !1""~1 ! \ """" ..... """"""" :.,. ~?t~::1i:~~---"'-__ 1[. ... "IED 1 ~:::'A.~ ~-3491 16sls1 f7\ C2II8...L~1 """ .. -~ ..... ..:-,:::.""'--' __ Ud,'-:--' ..... ,=- :"'''''-~--.--=~-,-~ .... ~~..-j _ ..... - ~--.",...-..... ,.., ~:::'A~ ~-3480 .ta. nr:l"'rl\ Irl""'< (3\ IN COMPUANCE WITH CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS ."LCiL I V L LJ ~I"'" MAR 1 .;\ 20'5 . ~~Q.R!~I.NE PERMIT SHORELINE PERMIT IVlAt"(I."H 01. 2016 SITE 05-YD om om __ _ i . :": .. • i ;'," '" , 'I" i" I ;1 , , i i ljl I '1 I, I I , !'I' I z o 1-- Z' ~ .... o ~ o ~--1§~ ""~ .. ~'<~::~~ H --- 81S.1.cPS =: oiEl. ~ ~;.,::;, 816_1-CPS =:-::::a:::e::.;-- ..::-~ }t ~..;. ~jf.~ __ YJn:... ., o __ 0 ';":'''::=-= .. o ~:~~';::~:::::'~:":':!!:!:;':;:::', :~i~~i~'i :~~l :f1:"':' ::~::,::~!,:;:. :l~j;: ;::,; :i ::;r ': Wl-:tl";~: l~~~~i~'i:~1~1~h~J: 11~~ ~n .~ ~ .:=.~- :;... ... w5r-=~-...::r=';;A ... ------!="~- 8· NEENAH FLAP GATE VALVE m .:i..!Lc:;m OIl/WATER SEPARATOR -280 GPM (OWS-059) Q\ ....... C2SI-Cl'!I9..l...c:;ag J(JS -"T ..... _ n................. C2H. C2SI-Cl'!I9, ....... ~--EJ..t'iQ-----.---.. m em' !.llkh j1li'4--' r ~:;;;:.-. '.".!L#~ -~ 1...11r"-" ~ --' '"+/ \~ .... .... "'-,,-, .... ""' .... ~ ~' ~. ~ ~~! ~ .. ~ ... ~-.-. ~ !~~-:~.-.. !~=;..~~.:?:;;re;;=- 10,000 GAL FUEL CONmNMENT (URE 785 & URE 786) @ TANDEM PRE CAST VAULTS aoo."""""'" m '!Ill[: FOil RIll El!'IlTDIS 5EI: !KEf c.sl. t.-' ~." I!~- , -.-_ ...• .L.-~ -;"~~_:~ JI; \~ ___ ~~::-_ Jj L==- TYPICAL ANTIFLOATATION COLLAR f'f\ m CZi-BIIEINO' C295.~...L~ IN COMPUANCE WITH CIT'( OF RENTON STANDARDS " " «'0'0';( I-~/ ~1S':1Jlou';'~ : _~J,~~:;~'=rl?<"~~ICAL .• ~ L-I -, '''''''''''''lION t~Jrl ElM.lDI) O-zs-:-J ECEIVED I,SSI)-t-~fRtllPl€l.UERCllOIIco..K. ~~2'~~="~S:~==411:0:5 _roo. lIISSDOSOIIISTOIl'I'EA_IDMT. Il"ISIO!I£rcmu£lItltAQtDf1'l£ ~70;::':~;:'~~~NTON m P 90N nUltAStD'l'"'sl"t D"'r",,,~I<>D~ 12~ to 3n~ rn.m .... r PI_ t-O-; ,-mR st..w1I 'ritho.t Gno.tboa (!)POD Top) ~l H·--- -.~ Pro.h,,,t , ~ • • , o.."rt!>Uon ~ ,,~I;.1'i.ICb1 1~20DS , .. ~. 'I' I' 12-DlA. UieOOS ,,. ~ 'I' t e-Slot H .. 1Cbl II~-DU. I_OS ". ~ ,j' I' e~ Slot U~t 111-DU. leeons ". ~ 'I' I' II~ Slot B0tcht &4" OlA. :ili400DS a' ,j' 'I' II~ Slot Uet.:ht " 30-DI .... 3(I(I0D8 ~. oj' ". " II~ Slot H ..... bt 311-D ..... _M •. oj' ". " O· Slot Beta-bl 0 ,t 'I' 'I' 'I' 'I' 'I' 'I' __ fJ"mB ....,&0 to piP" 100,,",", H Caetooa1 0I.t ~tl .. f'D'Z DWIr:TD .. IIECEs:I 11· ... ' 12" 1:'-18" 21--DllRASlOTe ADAfTER ~..---n I'" P I~ , Ilg D ~ rl--0_--=1 I-- 11 L 110 1] I~ b A I '--"--"""'"'" -..... A B C D ,~~ ""'* "" lZ1Z-DS ItI4-U ". ". 14.11" 1~.4· 5.5-Jt13-J..I.- lsa-IIS 15I4-U .,. ... 17.75" I!!.'" 11.5-1513-J..I.- IIIR-DS 1114-ll ,,' ,,-tl.4-n,' 7.5-11I3-U- Un-DS 2U4_J..I. .. ' 14.'-ts.2-21.25-, . UI3-J..I.- H~S I):1fG f61): ;} DURASLOT SURFACE DRAIN BY HANCOR m , oj' oj' oj' oj' oj' 'j' oj' DURASLOT«I Surfac:e Dratns Slot Olrnenslons 15" ~wIItI ~ HeighI ~ (15900S) ,':";1 . ,'1 t·_-- ~ ... ---"" ..... --""-__ ._ .. _ ... __ H .. _ ..... _ ....... d. a-.or. .... _ .... _~ ... __ _ 12-IS-10-24~ PlIR6SIWe END C6P 2,\-r-A-j tt-Wlll (Uw l:!OLIID == .,"""" OftlGUUJo ,~ . A • ,~ .. ,~ .. = Iz:or.t-DS 1U7-U ,,. ~.78" .~. 1533-DS I~-AA ". 7."n" =- ID:r.J-DS IDIJ7-AA ". ft."'" 11.50" .. ~" ""-u .. ' '.4S" ,. Hers D1fG IEC 3 DURASLar-Assembly Example wI Open Slot \ '\. I .. , J::::",i/ / JfI '1ii.7b _\~.1lI /.//.1 if " DUV.sLUT EIldC.., . ~ .... , ~-» f<DSH-12",'_HiQ E IltJAASl.OT c:c..,ta-"-I f 0lI1lASl.0T SIal C.., Y16··'I~.1·t.oo,. .. IYI~"V_ _Sloew!lpocer~ ... 1 ____ 4·""'1 Ho>.I_~ 511~··II"",_~.l·' -.JmW_""511~·""NoI 001USI.0T_"-,.-, f.oodC..,lAl .. ,........CC) __ .SIooC.(f). ,. , ~_CEl _____ ~ ...... (Ir.'''"itof_ FIoop(~~_.........., .... I'IIoIi<SioeveSpoar(J) __ IIa._~~l ,...12"_ ......... _~-.... _ ....... "' ___ IlVAASl.OTSURFIlCEDRAIN~ p,o,>nIENT-............ ~ I~-'__ rD..l"""""tt- #4012' ox. U IN THE NON-fERROUS ARU, USE #4012' O.C AS!J,N 100 GFRP REBM II'~'" " ~" ." IN NON-FERROUS AREA USE #B012' ASlNI 100 "" .... l' CU (TVJ') I ~ 1):1IR6SJ.o'" INSI'M IATION PRACTICES lw:"-= LD nfto 11+_'. Elt3PT ",. "!III Dwu:LOT IIMIJIII nIIIT ... .lIa'UoIIII _ HlUvr mmc CONDmON t;Atpg, r ~~pg,J:;~. 6' ~IN· CRUSI£II ROCK......-"i CO~PACllll 1U 9SlI: .~y~~ -~r- .r---IIO c .... :n: ~ ~·~~6'4. ~ ····O·"ifl"·_()"1 J.'_ '''\ ...• .. .< .: .. " "'-r_~~ ~ ASIIoI 0-1557 '~ H AIRPLANE RATED STRUCTURAL FOUNDA.TION IN COMPLIANCE 'MTH CITY OF RENTON STA.NDA.RDS " " " " "IT "IT "IT "IT MAR 1 4 2016 CITY OF RENTON PlANNING DIVI SHORELINE PERMIT J/~--/~ =,..,. .• ~ • .po" ,..- ~ .. -.,, __ ;,.o; ~f}?,D MARCH 01, 2016 ~CWL .... -.. -... ... -It -..,. (I) ACCtFT.l8II.I1Y Cl.(J.ID 0>.0'.11 -'"'-f STORMDRAINA.GEDETAIlS W.l441886 RI" OJ.01.16 II1II; m"'f1Df<L>jE~,(l1'IOl£CT ,IC RWS W". ....., "':::''=''K~ r_ u r7'i .OE''''O· ii _. ~ -dii:i ~." .. ~ m ~ ~, .,...,..,.,.. Q ""'" C510 C41 i ~ -~ ... .01.11 SITEOS-YD W~I865 ~ • CMl ~R R£IIlllN. IA ~ ..... -t510 SAFE DRAIN ! . i I ! :l' I i i II i, j, I ! Ii ill' I i ' I •. 1 i i ! ,il II " , / • ! / I! I' Ii I I z '" v; e-z w '" z ~ z 0 u ~ 0 '" >-u;~ 'l Ii .. I , 'I ! • , II GRADE r 215 REBAR HOOP ~OLYMPIC Irdl035 O/T LOCKING CLEAN OUT RING '" CO~R :};" '-.~ .. ~1 UATCH PAVEMENT SECl10N CONCRETE J I I ~ APRON U '-THREAOm CAP "'" '" eE" ~ ~~" '" ~(/ ~\gJ '\lAoon~~ \~ • l' DI.o.NElDl PlCX HOL£ !f.oLLU,1 '-~ , , ."'FGE6~ HOPE PIPE ~ I ~H I -J VIl " IF UNE DEAD ENDS. INSTALL WATERllGHT PLUG = CONCRETE -ASTM C94, 4000 PSI, 5% (±1%) AIR ENTRAINED (ASTM C260) WATER/CEMENT RATlO~O.45. SLUP_4_INCHS CONSTRUCTION JOINTS COMPLETE AND CONTINUOUS TO FULL DEPH-I ALONG APRON PERIMETER USE CARSON BOXES FOR SOFT (LANDSCAPED) .... AREAS. ROOF DRAIN & SUMP DRAIN CLEANOUT (T\ ~ C:m-ci9&~i2 -.. -"---.L."- Wit." _1')'_F\DmJOI[IITlJII[WAIDN.a""""", • rti-III1EIND' P- ft I' ~. ! ' _;;,;) --1 ;'f~;I;",," , ,-- :::~~;;;.~ :====---= I®=I DEBRIS BARRIER ~ IN COMPLIANCE 'NITH CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS (T\ C2!15-<:29i;Jss12 RECEIVED MAR 1 4 2015 CITY OF RENWNlTE: " ,,~ " ,,~ " ,,~ " ,,~ SHORELINE PERM'ff 10l 1<8 F~~~::"~ MARCH 01, 2016 ~CWL ® ACCO'TABIlm' iiii= ~'="'5=" .-·""h~ .- ;,01,11''''''' STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS ~ BOElIC737 _ fUCH1UI£ unLIlIES-wroH A CI PRWECI SITE 05-YD --""'" ~I =88SI""""DRI C512 W:l#lll!re ~-A-C$12 t1J,Ol.15 C43 , KEYED NOTES !lET WIll lW stAB ~ JIlE&IW.LT OOT ..... mB. 0l0I9MT[ LOCATON mctWl.l'IIIHI'IIII'SU'ftJ£R'S~IIEIIEORCEIIO{fSlW.l. ACCCWOOI1l' ~-20 LJloIOO,C 2. WETWW.:;rRUI;TIME 9~·. lYP( 2 CAtcH _ PER WSDOT sr_ PIAN B-IO.ro-1. INl1T STS. sa: SIIE 5PECn:; D£T1JlS roR EUVAIDM. SIZE NIl OUNfA1llN- IN( SCAL~ ~NECTIJI ON AU. SI1IlJ;fURI: I'EIIORAlI)NS. s. warn: ru.. SiDPm ro [IN< ro P\W 1Il.ET_ 5_ !IO.5ES!.OIIlOFtEST~fIIIII.~M/,lMsoc.lNSIAlI._1!-KH OO'IHDrWlllR'!'~to$TASlJlIf1lKlOJX)N. 1. ~ IICC[SS ft/oltM, II-ZIl u,l!D. or I'IUlUt1S ID-2, 4II-,n-, ID.aE: UN _-SI'lI a»:IE\I. 8. C(lIlIF1IOCrollCttlllODtlElrtl)l.J';.FU».15I1lEIWnIPTlI TJWISDOC:EllI£AllIll.IACOII...,IQIDUAtAAII- LIYU. t:ONTlD,. TlWo'SI;llCtt S£M£NS Alooo. 10 HIDJIOST ..... EU-SSSIJIJIDISI8I..ElIIlSTt"MIUII'I.U'5W1lHH·DISCIW!CE f'If'IIG DUTY POIN16 1.(Ql GPU AT 17' l!)l, 7.!) ff'. 4IllV. 3 PH, ge9 RPU,\MWWP!l.I.!R_ 11. CALIWIIZEO GUID£ iIIltS, SCf£OOLr 4(1. USE: II'ITH HIDROSTOL RAIL S'!S'T[~ 12-8"01 BENO (nJ. 1], NJr US<D. 14_ ItDIIIlSTAl ZCIII.RCI: Q.lDr. 15. IIJT usm 1~ flIlIn auuc;.. IiOWIC :11)1 01'1 (IllIII.. ~~~~~-~~~ 17. 4"PJ'[ SCIj ~ F'ot. Ie. lit( SEAL IWKJlE CIlNIf:tIOR. 19 96" m'E 2 ClltK EIISIN WlVE IWJ\.I. 4' Il£PIll :zo 8'QSPOOl(FlXfl) 21. .....VNfIlDI mu IJ! P\ASlC l.ODOOI 10 Fl.IXIR. AU SlNNUS5 fWWIIIIIlE. :z:z. 8" 01 Cl£CK VALVE (FlJ U Pfl(SIJ'PtRl. 24 8'0 CATE 'II.lV'E (fll WIlH!WI;II'IUl. :a ..,.. usro. <&. 8"llCTLERlIIPf'Ea.s:z(\'Q.1RENCII1IICKIlJ.ISctlf. 27. 1.£VEI.0000000l~~~101'AIEL- 23. Jfi"14:rI'ATDi(Mll)RI\lEDfl)f!II-20l.1I\!IIC,urf'RO(U;TSlYP(~J OR EOOAL CASf HATCH FlIAIII[ INlO ~T UD 29. SUIIP WIlH CRIll[. lO. T1IAP ON 0UTllT PIPE. 11. S".e".r 01 lU (FL). PIP\: SUPPOI!T. Jl. IllACKU 10 IIAlL I:l ~~~ = 7.67 f!G!j ffi'El NJ.IN 6.57 lAC I'UIIP ON ~.117 LDD lUll' ON J.l1 PlM'm' UZ LOW!l.VEl LOCI(OOl a.IIPII \lit lZ"1JI..M!!T SNU5 ""'" - PLAN VIEW LIFT STATION PLAN AND ELEVATION ELEVATION 'I1fW _M RE CEl'v'ED ~, DATUM NOTE: PlANS I'RmIRED I9G ICMI 251 as IHE W«O(.()Il'\M.TDCUttEI!ITD*""I1III W lS!S6 FID" TO 10. fllWIlD5. ~.IIE''''D· IN COMPUANCE 'NITH CIT'( OF RENTON STANDARDS " " " MAR 1 4 2016 lL_ 1Z-11 1..i0- m @ , An n: ~ w(1~\:~ --® ==-r-I ~~~~:~~i~~~ 1 I ~ __ _ _ _, '~f'-"-W--Tt-' BJ ~ I) r~~:':l~~M;;l ,,:-~~'-, . ,(0'::l1l' ~ -_ lae -. -"':>' ", "" , -."" ~-.-"'-~ .. ! < ," ~f/ " (,. i?n~, '" IL,,' IR®I I]-.i.:\ \","_~. !j,@Y,-,,,,=\,,IIIIJ') "=," -= 11 3 @" ,~ <::r---'P ___ 'i'= =' "" (Jj ". "" ~ -;./ M~~-----J I 0-f-~ lJ01~ R I I l'I ~"'~-----w-~ , """ -~~. '" n ,(./" '~".i\ .. ',.. <D I@)@@) ;,.!I--. ~',; '" II" ~ I ~ 1 • '.. Fie-\ ~-~-~ . I ~ ~,. " ' ' I) 1 m'' __ \~ . 'j • It = ... 1 L\ 'U- "'. /-/ c • ~-<D--~'--/1 ~ 1""'1 : cr ~ "~"-----/ I :il r-- I :@ o , ! f , m m SIIIIVRf SEWER STllRII IlIWi sYSJnI ______ 'P ______ __ J, ,'" """"~- PLAN VIEW '® 'if' .. .,u''''\, j> . j . A -, !' ", II!' /" 'i Iii',,,,., --: ,-'~ .--:'. .' . -, ' .. ' "II" :'~~ '.~____:>" ;,::!;)··,::,~·i.,i:-\·-:·:;;~,·:.~:"·: 1 19.7 .= . -.. ,"11",:-,'_":.>-.11-.. :. '<':~:H;. '" ~ """" (X 'IJ.Ul.T_ 1MJ :;, ~ r n Tj'II' T" ~Ulll - -~"""" Q' w.u.T_ t.OJ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ -~"""" Ill' W".U_ 1I.~2 SECTION A ~ ADP-21.95~ .~ ===t' ~~~ .' ~iY--------~;,:,~;, Qf WUl";o II.n .: _ _ =:~ .. :. '."! cr or JfIDDI . -~~.------.• :.! ""'-,,~ ~-----""--,,--"."'-",,-"'''.' , ~. ,," "';'1' 0-----L~~· " ~= 10 KEYED NOTES I. OLDCASII.E PRECAST ~ VI.!.1.T. I02'-tA-l(1.!'EJ! OCIAL 4 ON ~IG. .oww_ ACCESS HllCH LW IC-I a (3Ir.scl NOM-5IIIO OOIJED 12. 12"" COI.FUNG 13. 12""04· DI I!EIlUCER ,.. PlP[Slf'POII'I. ZJ. ~ lIfE: ~ IF r..: VI.LVE 511H15 .IN~ SfAl AU. OP£MNGS TO PREVENT SURFACE IlUtlUl FROII EI/TIJIING VIoULJ • 24. O~'04·DlfE£ ~~ ECEIVED ~~'·:::r:-! LJjK !Dt -.:u: CONIEmIlR ()Ij ~ Sf1IU(;]lJI!E PEH£l1U.T06. •. at.S( SUB ro RE'Sl'ON FIIII.l.tf!lUIlM; ""1M: SOIL I6lJilIllN. 1Z~ DEPIII Qf Q\IU!R"t SIW.lS 10 5IABIUZE fOlINl\1DN. ~ LADOCR PEl! CII\' Of I![I(ltJj STD PUI 104.50. 6. fI.OIISDtV'E~EI.!ClIII:.ocJUI.TOII.~I'!!OOfNl;)WWlIEII -I. IT DI fI1 !lOCI (F1J. a. 12" DI 45" !lOCI i. 12-U·.U· II lIE. I~. ITDI $I'DOI. (FLI. II. 12· IlIIIEInl ..... 1'£ 1IIII111C1U11D11 I'. lTlJ.CIU RON PIP[ Cl 52 (F'E). II!OO! EIIQ(fIJ. IS cor. 16. 12""El.fj(IA.N«>E. 17. N'!;O 143(; I· COIla IJI .t ~ RElU ... VI:. !Kll iIOOJ. ,. '" ON TOP or lEI .rnt I' IUllEII CORP. 51W. 16. ~. DI '5' !IEICI It ~. DI SPOQ. (L-241 20. ~. &lIE 'OoU'E (FlJ IIII1l IW'J Mm 21. •• KIiOIINE CPm1II 4IlXI IVER. SI.9OSUL. 12m 22. •• DI SPOOl. (L;oI21 " <~ l6. r" lJ.CIU RON I'ft Cl 52 (P£). lI!E1ICIi !W:J(FU IS cor. ~E-. 12-IJ fl. r" El.fj(I fI.IIU a "'-~,~.~, ~...-®--.. ®-... CITY '-"N :!II SI.U' PI.U'. 11'1'1)110111.11: D5PSI All. 17:i1 FIN. 1201, IP. 1/2 .... IIImII or ImRIOR {" V or \IN.U. 8.113 • 1O. ~~~~W!HtT 1Il1-1/~' CORP!iltI' .. PI'[ ~ IIImII IF EmROR .•• ~:. . . ' •• -Pli IN. COMPUANCiI," In Of or..oo-B.J2 RENTON STANDARDS SECTION B BT D .... TE .,,' "rr DATUM NOTE: f'\N<:i MIWI£Il U5INC MC\O :zg /is lit: ~ IM.lUt.I. 10 CCIIMJO 10 ~ lIS oImlMllF£EllOO\U.D£M11OH5. FLOW oWERSloN SYSTEM VALVE AND METER VAULT ~ SCAlL:Ia'r "llm:FDIIRlWEl£'OJlCIISSEI'SIfiI"ClSI. 1;2i16CS14 SHORELINE PERMIT I BT om MARCH 01, 2016 ~ MAR 1 4 2016 CITY OF RENTON nL *SIU 'HTUNE U1llJl1E5-~ A 0 PIlOJEtT SITE OS-YO OJ.01.1' C514 C45 '" l\ l\ l\ l\ , I 'I , , " :: J\ " .':. ,~ lrf; /\. I L ~W-21.95 ii,,, .ii,~ '''' "F 'j '.'."Lt '''L ,,,,., ~··lF. ,"', ii ~i= .. -11,.-. " " :'1.'-' = t= ~=j~ __ ":! 1. " .:-.-:r:-::l ii = ii J . .J: IJ ::::: : ·~;::·-::-·:-i=~~~jt= .. :~.:::~.:-; 1'--:..'11 OF WlJLT_ 19.03 I -I 0-. '7 <D-.j; 7 ~cuo~ = lE.= ,,~~;,ik-'!-~~ l~~~~Si~~~~~~~~';;~;;~~========:=~~-~:=========;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -~~ OF \IlI1.l.T_ 8.J2 SECTION C o KEYED NOTES 0UQSIlE PREGI.ST 5EC1llIW. VAUlT. 1(124-l,!-lo.. PER IUAi. 4 ON C5U. 1. ItJMJIUW ACCESS HIIltH UllGJ-l B (3s".w1 NJIl-SI<lI coo.:rm 3. U~ S<AL IWlHlLE roNNECTOI! ON AU. smu:ruRE PElfETAAIDNS. 4. BASE 5lAI! lU R!5T ON ~I!II, UN'I'IElDt.'C "'1M SOl. INSfAU. WN. 12-IN:H 00'1H Of CIJAI!Ifr ~ TO STABUZE ~mtl 5. lAOO£IIPER[ID'[)f_sro~204.&I 6. FllMSElM' Ut.llTORQlJE EI.EClRt: N:TUI.TIlR. ~F'tOSIQN PROOF I.N[I WE.l.THER -. lZ"DlWl!EIfO{Fl). a IZ'(1I 45" I!OI) IZ,12",Iz" III lIT. Ill. IZ"1lI5f'1JOl{fl) II IZ' WTlI."IIfI.y I'AI.'I'E WITH IC1UI.lOR FLOW DIVERSION SYSTEM 11. 12" COI.II'IJN> 13. 12",4' III ilUlOCER 14. PIPE SUPPOl!T. 15. 12""00CTll IRON PIPE CL ~Z (PEl, lRENCH BACKFll IS cor. 15. 12" IIl.H.I fWU. 17. N'CO 14:J; I' COUB. III! I: \I\CIAIE I!ElJ[f VAllIE. 5INGlE BOO'Y. I" TIf' ON TOP Of 1II IIIIlll I" IlJEUEI! 00Rf'. SI(J>. Ill-'"1lI45"1IEKI 19 ," DI SPOOl (L.241 20. ," (;AT!' I'AI.'I'E (nJ WITH HANIl WHUL 21. 4" ~1lOON£ OI'TFUJX 4IW Wffil!, SUBllERSIBlE. 120'1 22. 4' D1 SPOOl (L·ll1 """'" 'IIOl£: FOfIRIIoI ElI.VA"OONS SEE Sl£El"C451. SECTION D 2.l. GROI.ITTHEBI>S£OflHEVALVE~Almstll-AlLOF'ENINt;SmPl!EYB!l 5UI!FACE .... ATER FROII ENTERII£ 'VAUlT. 24. 6")[6·,4· DllIT Z5. 8" WJl'lJNG 2 •. II"IlUC1lLE~Pl'ECL~(PE).JRI;NI:HII\CI(FllI5CCf"_ V B" IIU~ flNICE ZB. 42" roJIlD 1.0, TRAffIC IlAlUl ZR SUIOf' PIMP, H'YDfI(IU\.TI;: ~ AEI, Will Rf'II, 12UV, IP, I/Z lIP, .lO. l-I/~" 0ISCfWlGE: f()5(. CONNm 10 1-1/'" (;OR!' STOP I~ I'1PE SPOOl UI'SIR£AW[)f_rrM1'~, rT\ C296"'§15 ~ -----_._- I J ....... ~ I~. . ..•. =-. =.-J.. o.z. ' ......... _ ',' -"- ;, ---~--' ~ -.-.~ -= r~J I! ._1-1 '-L ,:4~ --. ~~"". '. " , ,. ~-;;.=-0;",_,,-,:_ iE-, ',_ '::1' :':""'-' "':-:"00::.. -- :?VS1== m~ i 'f¥: I : I ~'4 ~-I ~#i'I'I-'-1 z:r~:: ::: :: :. :: ,or ~ I'" ... ... ...., .... ooou. __ " .. «_ .,.,---. __ ..... _--_ .. _ .. _- . ::=::::::::'-:..0:.:.=--""--- 'Eh~~=~~E'::'T"£=' . ==.=.::.....--..... _ .. _- ~ ~ l====r------=:"1 ®p;~~1 CATCIt ....... T'I'PI!2 IIIID.I'I.MI-... --- RENTON CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 """'" RECEIVED MAR 1 4 20iS CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION' Il\ C295-C2!l6jgi15 IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS " " " ,,~ ,,~ ,,~ BY DATE DATUM NOTE: SHORELINE PERMIT __ ~i~~~ MARCH 01 1 2016 ~CWL .... -Of _ ... .... -.. -... ® ::;;c.;:.--= J WlII "-'0"1 STORM DRAINAGE DETAlLS W~l~ RIC !l.l.Ouo ,._ T.""""" "'",,1.1, ~ .,..; m"",nD<T\.N[UTl.IttS---*"'.ClI'RII.ll:I 1: ... "-'~u. rX BIIEINO. ~ =r: """ ....... SCI!IUlCEI' "'"'" TIllE BO£lMG737t.IUfUCHruNEUllUlIES-AI'1ION~CIPROJECT C515 C46 § ~ .. ~......,.. "'""I." SITE05-YD "'-II'JMI!II!6 """'... ~ CMl WASTIR ~, ....... Il5-APRON ...... -C515 ~-' , ~ ~--= .... _- = - ~~.'.~' ~.- " . 0£-- ~ ~~-- =. "----.. -~ ~'"::'-;::?E:.::':'= L:"'':':=:::':::''-_'' .=';,.-:-...:=--.=':..-::='---'J~::7!~::= :,:r.::----..... - t:::1 =--:"'_-:::::.--aa==-- I~-I~I~I!I ... --.-I -------- TYPICAL STORM DRAN TRENCH SECTION Q§? rm CH!t-C2M C:!!ilS I.ARG!: !E'T1OHAL VAULT IllS 'MarE: FOR RIll El£VArICNl SEE SHEET 001. _1'l1"'1I.O<II.Ol~''''''lUECI lie ~ 0l-Il1.\0 T Mill " '1 1.l.c I' 'f9?'~ '8'," ," •• o' "':--r--NOT TO SCALE =::::-:"""" ~_"'OIO) :r:,.~wr-) --=,,--::=r'o!'.., ..... -... -.....--_.- _ ...... _0£.. ._- ..xr .. "'!=-'!: ___ ~::c- ,~ _ r=:FT7!.: I ,o.T."_1 "'ill I 11l':11Eff::::I\'.::'lilSflal STANDARD SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ~ !ITS Cl9J, C2M (:515 LARG£ SECTICINAL VAULT r---'_ l~~:::~~J ct~- ~ . r;:;:''::-f~- f / / ,1] S' ", ~! t. ] --!; == i: ---- _ ~ ...... ""':.1 ,~.!! ii,: .... [)---.:::~ 1.I:=:==iJ --- 112-SA-3000 .. - ~~ r;;!/I--.-:'7 ~F:::=,' ''''-, ~."Z-m' , '~'." , .....•. '.'. .' ~~); ~i r :::::f 1 1£ 11.011 ~ ",., ~ , ' ", . r--,.-, I ~ ~I i -I Iii A "-==JIJI1jIY', -1 J'LJ It II h ---,..,,, l:,~tj-c:-,,=,J~ .lib 1':~~~f::;;=J~~:i~ .. __ __ ____ _o.<\lUlII-_~ .. -... _-- ~ SII!HE!" eel fOR RIll ElMlOO. OIL/WATER SEPARATOR 612-SA-3000 (OWS-0581 @ I!TS I em, em (:516 1 ,--.--... -.... -~ ... - ;;!' ~ )CgI ... r R_ECEIVED (1)11 1 1 .-.~'\, MAR 1 4 2016 ...=..'::--==---= 'I§' -::... -=-=.... ~~. -I IN COMPLIANCE \'11TH CITY OF RFNTON STANfJARDS STORM DRAIN MANHOI Eq;!?'1 OF RENTO • -g;;, '" PLANNING DIVISION ""~" DATUM NOTE: fVHS PREI'MED l.SfjG 1 _~_ BY OI\TE__ \'ElITI()I.(».T\al.TOlXlH\ ---'" om__ SHORELINE PERMIT ~~=M"""",,, CmlC:!!i15 I:: ~:~--MARCH 01, 2016 ~PWL ® ~~.oBI~ • CL110I D1." ........ STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS .)44,886 "ORTIT OJ.ous _s_ '.anJo " (7\ BUEIN.· ii _ ... -,~ ~,,--"'-""""'''''""'-'''''',,~ C516 I C47 l~ ~ -_ 0J.01.1I SITE OS-YD ~H185 ; I CML IAASTEII REmON. VIA'" 1J5--Af'RI.lN ...... -~1~ • • 1 I I -Renton'® NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNlfICANCE· MmGATED (DN$-M) pomt) TO NOTlFl' INTERESTto P£~ONS OF AN ENVIROIliMENTALACl10N P~OJ.CT NAMIJ ............ 11J a M.llI PROJICT MUM.a. UJ.o.a-oDDIID, m,w LOCAnON! 6HW ....... 1IoI DDIJItP1'IOMI 'Oil APPUCAHT IS IUQUtsnNG SUA DMRONMUfTAI. RM(w AND A SHORWNI SUISTNflW. OEVnOI'MM I'tIlMI'I' 10 P'ItOVIOI TWO AlIICIIAfT PAIIJ(INQ rosmaN! AND ASSOCIATED INJ1IASTlIlICnJlli FOA 8O(lNO 731 AIRCRAFT. EACH STAll WOUlD II .... Lt TO ACCOMMODATI! DE-laNG OPERATIONS. THI PROJECT IS IDCATED AT THE RtNTON MUNIO,AL AIRpORT, III W PERIMETER RD. TNE SITE II U,UO S, AND IS ZONED INDUSTlIIAl MEDIUM (1M). SIT! IMPROVEMENTS WOUlD INCLUDI PAVEMENT REPAIR AND REPlACEMENT, INFRASTIIUCRJRI INCLUDING, WATER, AlII, ELEcntlCAI., UGtmNIi ANO noRMWATI!R DRAINAGIIMPRDVEMENTJ. ONI NEW 1,S!O Sf 5Ul'ER CAlIANA BUILDING AND 20 FT. UGHT STAND ARI PROPOSED AND TH. RELOCATION 0' TWO BLAST FENCE!, 3 UGHT STANDS,AND ON!3fID 5P (!lEW 5HEllm. DVERAU. THI PROJECT WOULD INCIlEA.5E IMPERIOUS (ovlllAGI BY "OlD SI' AND RESULT IN 3,!ICID C1J~IC YARM 0' GRADINO. mE Sill" IJ I.OCP.TUI WITHIN A SlISMIC IIAlARO ARlA ANO AlOfoiO 11Ir CEDAII. KIVU A ~~~u,:~~::rTH~~!. REACH A THE C£DAII RIV(II. 5HOREUNE IJ DESIGNATED AS HIGH IfoiTENStrv THE CITY 01' ~(NTOfoi WVlROfoiMENT/ol REVIEW COMMITTEE (EIIC) HAS IlEIDMlfoI[D THAT "THE ProPOSED ACTlOfoi HAS PROIIAILE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS THAT CAN It MmGATEO nlROUGH MmGATlON MWUII.B. .....".." of thl _"",_I cMtaml""tJon _ "'!IIed In wrtdnt; an ... bIfcn 5:l1li pm. .... Ap1111, ;tD16, "'pili'" with the Nq~INCI'" with: Hurl", luminlr, CIty of ~, 1055 SoutII Orady W." ~ WA g1M7. Appull to the lumlnar ... ....,..,. .. by aty af RMI: _110 Ind Information reptdlnllhl 'ppoool p ...... a m., be abtlln .. from u.. Rlntan CIty aerie'. om ... (4151431Hi51D. ~OTT~:IEE~VIRONMENTIll. DETERMlfoiATlON IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING Will BE SET AND ALL PARTIES ......... ,. 111_-.· ._ •• I, VOtil.sJ{A'l)tb<::e--, hereby certify that 2> copies ofthe above document were posted in ~ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Date: d--Il-/{,p Signed~DM;{14 STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledge I· to be h' uses and purposes mentioned in the inst n'lent, \)Q0:>9~ ~ r/their free and voluntary act for the Dated: 3: \ l~ ! \0 _ ...... ""'~~.II"~\9\\1o\1;:.I!I.tr::--~_~..:::4---l---~?----------- : ___ ~~~~"'N'e""",'9N ~ry ublic in and for teState of Washington = s:: ,,-.. .. ,0 J(I>~'",,'~ ~ ~ ~ ;= () g~ o~/t..R,.. ~ .. ~ ~ ~ -:::r ~ U' ~;...: " § ~ 8 ~. t>le ta 1 gr~t): ~ ~ -'"' CA, ~ (, I> JJ '!i~,.J I--::1 <A '\.:l \ ....., d' V ' ~~}l?,P<a'!2'1'~~~!res: 5=\ 0 0-0\0 II -<ll', 11\\\\\\\\"," ~~ .:::- II111 l: OF '/'II' " ... ~ 11111\\\\\\\"'" STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on March 18,2016. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $118.88. ~ tr1nda Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter ~~ me this 18th day of March, 2016. Gale Gwin, Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Puyallup, Washington \\\\111""1 "", X:. G WIN 1111, .:-t--'\.; •••••••• ' .:-c:d -••• -S'o\'\ EXPIj;_. '"'' ~ l.i~ {!.Jo.-:' -0.;' .' _ i3 ~O\ ",\'<'I \ z ~ _ '. o\:{o\)C ; 0 = , _. 't" :1-- , .n' • r~ -" v/': 0.. f:J~" ~ ~ ,.~ ..d). •••• 08-\~-;.··.~ ~ ·,"'c ....... ":> ......... "'" OF \j'\~ "", . /'"11\\\\\\ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON. WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Detenni- nation of Non·Significance Miti~ gated (DNS·M) for the following project under the authority of the Renton municipal code. Apron A 737 CI Max LUA 16-000028 Location: 616 W Perimeter Rd. The applicant is proposing 2 aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall would be able to accommodate de-icing operations. The pro- ject is located at the Renton Municipal Airport. The site is 13,650 SF and is zoned 1M. Site improvements would in- clude pavement repair and re- placement, infrastructure in- cluding, water, air, electrica1, lighting and storm water drain- age improvements. One new 1,560 SF super cabana building and 20 ft. light stand are pro- posed and the relocation of two blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. Over- all the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,200 SF and result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Appeals of tbe DNS-M must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on April Ot, 20t6. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner clo City Clerk, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 . Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more infonnation may be ob- tained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 425-430-6510. Published in the Renton Reporter on Man:h 18. 2016. #1562227. • • ~ 0 " ::;;IE 6 • ill'" 0 x .!!l<!) Z 0 ~ f6>C/);!:: .0 ii;t?Il.E '" .!:::oCl)Q) :E u.a..~Q.. -. .: " 1 - a. 'N § ~ - '0 - c: 1t '" iii .. '" ~ ~ )--~ .. '0 \ '0 .. '" ~ cD C ~ E I ~ ~ .. '" ~ c: ~ ---() .. ::J =2 _. 0 - w >- !.! i!i 'E V) -.. > jo4 '" i!~ c. .~~~ .. = ~~oj .. . :I/' l'l t.: ""'" Q) ~ '0 c: G> Q) CI) 0 • I.n w lil N !:: z :J ('J i\l ('i r .. i • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 If Restricted Delivery is desired. X _ • Print your name and address on the reverse /' KEC"" "" 0 Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Received hv (Printed Name) .. , t; .C': Date of Delivery • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, " _;;,r~ . -.. -•• ~. - or on the front If space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: {Y)1Z?-ty ~\tti ( ~.Uf~QtV N vV Dt\I \ '1s1l.Y\ 3Lt10 ~ ILPut'Y\V~~ ~lM.R. ~q~()()g [)[)O1 5342 11'98 D. 3. Service Type o CertIfied Mail" OReglstered o Domestic Return Receipt address below: .... . ~ u. (,,' ," " .. ,\\j~ I"" o PrioI1ty MaD Express- o Return R_ptforM_ • • U.S. Postal Service'" EI)TIFIED MAIL® RECEIPT • mestic Mail Only .-'I , 0 Retum ReceIpt Fee I 0 (Endorsement Required) . 0 R_DelIvetyFeel------j D (Endorsement Required) .~ I----~ Po81m"" Her_ ,~ Total __ & Feee $ ,M~~~~~~~~~~~~ • • STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office. 3190 160th Ave Sf' Bellevue, WA 98008-5452' 425-649-7000 711 for Washington Relay Service' Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 April 8,2016 Mark Clement PO Box 3707 MS lW-09 Seattle, WA 98124 Re: City of Renton Permit-LUAI6-000028, ECF, SM -Approved Boeing Corporation, Mark Clement -Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SDP) #2016-NW-3178 Dear Mr_ Clement: On AprilS, 2016, the Department of Ecology received notice that the City of Renton approved your application for an SDP_. Your SDP authorizes the creation of two aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft within the Cedar River, Reach A -Shoreline High Intensity Environment. By law, local governments must review all SDPs for compliance with: • The Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW) • Ecology's Substantial Development Permit approval criteria (Chapter 173-27~IS0 WAC) • The City of Renton Local Shoreline Master Program Local governments, after reviewing SDPs for compliance, are required to submit them to Ecology. Your approved SDP has been received by Ecology. Please note, however, that other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to these shoreline permits. What Happens Next? Before you begin activities authorized by this permit, the law requires you wait at least 21 days from AprilS, 2016, the "date of filing." This waiting period allows anyone (including you) who disagrees with any aspect of this permit to appeal the decision to the state Shorelines Hearings Board. You must wait for the conclusion of an appeal before you can begin the activities authorized by this permit. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if they receive an appeal. We recommend that you contact the Shorelines Hearings Board before you begin permit activities to ensure that no appeal has been received. They can be reached at (360) 664-9160 or • Boeing Apron A 737 Cl Max April 8, 2016 Page 2 of2 http://www.eluho.wa.govlBoardlSHB. • If you want to appeal this decision, you can find appeal instructions (Chapter 461"'{)8 WAC) at the Shorelines Hearings Board website above. They are also posted on the website of the Washington State Legislature at: http://aDPs.leg.wa.gov/wac. If you have any questions about this letter, please contact me at (425) 649-4309. Sincerely, tY}~~ -- Misty Blair, Shoreline SpeciRlist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program E-cc: Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager, City of Renton Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Div. I. DEPARTMENT OF COrAaUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ----~lR'enton e Community & Economic Development PLANNING DIVISION SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT EVALUATION FORM & DECISION DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE: LAND USE ACTION FILE NO.: DATE RECEIVED DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: April 4, 2016 LUA16-000028, ECF, SM January 13, 2016 January 20, 2016 Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, staff recommends that the City of Renton grant a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. This action is proposed on the following application: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT MANAGER: OWNER: CONTACT I APPLICANT: PROJECT LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: Renton Municipal Airport Site: Apron A 737 C1 Max Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager Boeing Corporation, 737 Logan Avenue N, Renton, WA 98055 Mark Clement, Boeing, PO Box 3707 MS 1 W-09, Seattle, WA 98055 616 W Perimeter Road POR SECS 7 & 18-23-5 & POR TOBINS 0 C INCL paR PLATTED & VAC STS LY WLY OF COMM W W # 2 N OF N LN DIXIE AVE & ELY OF STATE HWAY # 5 & ELY & SLY OF FOLG LN BEG ON ELY MGN SO HWAY AT PT 5 FT S OF N LN OF LOT 8 BLK 18 BRYN MAWR TH E 89.23 FT TH N 05-16-51 E 438.90 FT TH N 40-09-47 E 188.55 FT TH N 60 FT TH N 29-00-40 W 197.07 FT TH 588-27-28 E 90.83 FT TH N 01-32-32 W 40 FT TH 5 88-27-28 E 234.53 FT TH S 35-00-00 E 142.41 FT TH E 403.70 FT LESS LOTS 19 TO 22 INCL BLK 4 RENTON REAL ESTATE COS 1ST ADD LESS PORTION FOR LANE HANGAR CONDOMINIUM SEC-TWN-R: WITHIN THE SHORELINES OF: APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: SEC 7 TWN 23N R 5E Cedar River, Reach A City of Renton PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to provide two aircraft parking positions and City of Renton Department of com.y & Economic Development Apron A 737 C1 Mox DATE OF PERMIT: April 4, 2016 • Shoreline Management Permit WA16-000028, ECF, SM Page 2 of 11 associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall would be able to accommodate de- icing operations. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 616 W Perimeter Rd. The site is 13,650 SF and is zoned Industrial Medium (1M). Site improvements would include pavement repair and replacement, infrastructure including, water, air, electrical, lighting and stormwater drainage improvements. One new 1,560 SF super cabana building and one new 20 ft. light stand are proposed, along with the relocation of two blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,020 SF and result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A of the Cedar River Shoreline is designated as High Intensity at the project location. FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The applicant is requesting a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to provide two aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall would be able to accommodate de-icing operations. 2. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 616 W Perimeter Rd., approximately mid airfield on the eastside of Runway 16/34 between the taxiway and the East Perimeter road. 3. The site is 13,650 SF and is zoned Industrial Medium (1M) and has a Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Employment Area (EA). 4. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A of the Cedar River Shoreline is designated as High Intensity at the project location. No other critical areas are present on the site. 5. Currently the site is used as a single Boeing aircraft stall which includes de-icing operations and a blast fence on the north and south side of the stall. The existing area contains asphalt and associated parking, fencing, a crew shelter and several sheds used for tool and equipment storage. The existing infrastructure includes sewer, water, electrical and storm. 6. The applicant has proposed site improvements which would include pavement repair and replacement, infrastructure including, water, air, electrical, lighting and stormwater drainage improvements. One new 1,560 SF super cabana building and 20 ft. light stand are proposed and the relocation oftwo blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. 7. New pavement would extend north of the existing development into the existing grass field. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,020 SF and result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading. The applicant has proposed to balance the increase in impervious surface coverage at the site by removing impervious area elsewhere within City of Renton Department of [omt.ty & Economic Development Apron A 737 C1 Max DATE OF PERMIT: April 4, 2016 • Shoreline Management Permit WA16-000028, fCF, SM Page 3 of 11 200 feet of Reach A of the Cedar River with a net result of no gain in impervious area within 200 feet of the river Reach. 8. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on March 14, 2016 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) for the Apron A 737 C1 Max. The DNS-M included four (4) mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on March 18, 2016 and ended on April 1, 2016. No appeals of the threshold determination have been filed. 9. Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments have been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of this report. 10. The two aircraft parking positions would be accessory to the Municipal Airport and located at the existing site, Industrial Uses are permitted outright in Table 4-3-090El Shoreline Use Table. 11. The following table contains project elements intended to comply with the SMP bulk and dimensional standards and as outlined in RMC 4-3-090: Policy SH-14. Shoreline use and development should be carried out in a manner that prevents or mitigates adverse impacts so that the resulting ecological condition does not become worse than the current condition. This means ensuring no net loss of ecological functions and processes in all development and use. Permitted uses should be designed and conducted to minimize, in so far as practical, any resultant damage to the ecology and environment (RCW 90.58.020). Shoreline ecological functions that should be protected include, but are not limited to, fish and wildlife habitat, food chain support, and water temperature maintenance. Shoreline processes that shall be protected include, but are not limited to, water flow; littoral drift; erosion and accretion; infiltration; ground water recharge and discharge; sediment delivery, transport, and storage; large woody debris recruitment; organic matter nutrient and removal; and stream channel City of Renton Department of comAy & Economic Development Apron A 737 C1 Max • Shoreline Management Permit WA16-000028, ECF,SM DATE OF PERMIT: April 4, 2016 Page 4 of 11 formation/maintenance. Objective SH-E. Existing economic uses and activities on the shorelines should ~ be recognized and economic uses or activities that are water-oriented should be encouraged and supported. ~ Policy SH-18. All economic activities on the shoreline shall provide for no net loss of ecological functions during construction and operation . II. DE~ELOPMENT ~~ANDA~DS: ." . . r' --. • . ;. • ••• . ' " . "he sqbject~ite iS~~SSifiilF,!ss~~OreliQili~igt14~\enSiiyo~th~,btY{6f REh\~()nShb~~lineOverla~\} Map .• :rhe followin~1ge~elopme~~i~~and~rds a[~}.applic~bl~ to •• t~e pr~posali. '. .' .. '.; 1. No Net Loss Required Shoreline use and development shall be carried out in a manner that prevents or mitigates adverse impacts to ensure no net loss of ecological functions and processes in all development and use. Permitted uses are designed and conducted to minimize, in so far as practical, any resultant damage to the ecology and environment (RCW 90.58.020). Shoreline ecological functions that shall be protected include, but are not limited to, fish and wildlife habitat, food chain support, and water temperature maintenance. Shoreline processes that shall be protected include, but are not limited to, water flow; erosion and accretion; infiltration; groundwater recharge and discharge; sediment delivery, transport, and storage; ~ large woody debris recruitment; organic matter input; nutrient and pathogen removal; and stream channel formation/maintenance. Statt Comment: The provided Standard Stream Study Narrative and a Habitat Data Report, both Prepared by AMEC Foster Wheeler, dated January 2016, then revised March 2016 concludes that the project will result in no net loss of ecological function in the riparian zone of the lower Cedar River, provided the mitigation identified in the studies are completed, including the replacement addition of vegetated area to compensate for the added impervious area. In addition to the mitigation measures identified in the SEPA determination shall be complied with. 2. View Obstruction and Visual Quality View Corridors Required: Where commercial, industrial, multiple use, multi-family N/A and/or multi-lot developments are proposed, primary structures shall provide for view corridors between buildings where views of the shoreline are available from public right-of-way or trails. N/A Minimum Setbacks for Commercial Development Adjacent to Residential or Park Uses: All new or expanded commercial development adjacent to residential use and City of Renton Department of comay & Economic Development Apron A 737 C1 Mox DATE OF PERMIT: April 4, 2016 • Shoreline Management Permit LUA16-000028, ECF, SM Page 5 of 11 public parks shall provide fifteen feet (15') setbacks from adjacent properties to attenuate proximity impacts such as noise, light and glare, and may address scale and aesthetic impacts. Fencing or landscape areas may be required to provide a visual screen. lighting Requirements: Display and other exterior lighting shall be designed and operated so as to prevent glare, to avoid illuminating nearby properties used for noncommercial purposes, and to prevent hazards for public traffic. Methods of controlling spillover light include, but are not limited to, limits on the height of light structure, limits on light levels offixtures, light shields, and screening. Staff Comment: The applicant has proposed new light fixtures. The provided stream and habitat report primaraly addresses the effects of the new and relocated light stands on the Cedar River and the associated Fish Habitat. In addition to the stream and habitat studies, a Lighting Impingement Study, prepared by Casne Engineering, Inc, dated December 1, 2015 was submitted with the application. Following agency comments the applicant amended the original lighting plan and submitted an updated lighting plan. These changes were proposed to help minimize artificial light ,/ intensity on the Cedar River. The letter indicates that the light impingement model was rerun incorporating the changes to the lighting plan. The result of the changed lighting plant represents an overall reduction of 33% in light intensity from the original design as well as a decrease of 0.1 fc from the maximum light intensity modeled under existing conditions. Furthermore the applicants indicated that to ensure that the model calculations are accurate, follow up light samples would be collected ot the conclusion of the praject. The SEPA review applied the following mitigation measures addressing lighting impacts: "The applicant shall provide the City and the Muckleshoat Tribe a follow up lighting study, fallowing the conclusion of the project, documenting that the new lights have not increased artificial lighting levels, on the lower Cedar River. If the study identifies increased lighting levels changes would be required to the new and/or existing lights in Apron A to reduce the levels ta be equal or less than current conditions" Reflected lights to Be limited: Building surfaces on or adjacent to the water shall employ materials that limit reflected light. Staff Camment: The modular structures are not anticipated to be built with reflective materials .. Integration and Screening of Mechanical Equipment: Building mechanical equipment shall be incorporated into building architectural features, such as pitched roofs, to the maximum extent feasible. Where mechanical equipment cannot be incorporated into architectural features, a visual screen shall be provided consistent with building exterior materials that obstructs views of such eqUipment. Staff Comment: Based on the provided elevations, it appears no mechanical ------------------------------ City oj Renton Department oj coma & Economic Development Apron A 737 Cl Max • Shoreline Management Permit LUA16-000028, rCF, SM DATE OF PERMIT: April 4, 2016 Page 6 of 11 equipment would be placed on the roof of the buildings. However, if mechanical equipment will be placed on either the crew shelter or the guard house it should be screened. Staff recommends, as a condition of approval, that all roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened. Visual Prominence of Freestanding Structures to Be Minimized: Facilities not N/A incorporated into buildings including fences, piers, poles, wires, lights, and other freestanding structures shall be designed to minimize visual prominence. Maximum Stair and Walkway Width: Stairs and walkways located within shoreline N/A vegetated buffers shall not exceed four feet (4') in width; provided, that where ADA requirements apply, such facilities may be increased to six feet (G') in width. Stairways shall conform to the existing topography to the extent feasible. 3. Community Disturbances: Noise, odors, night lighting, water and land traffic, and other structures and ,/ activities shall be considered in the design plans and their impacts avoided or mitigated. 4. Public Access Physical or visual access to shorelines shall be incorporated .in all new development when the development would either generate a demand for one or more forms of such access, would '. ". impair existing legal access opportunities or rights, or is required to meet the specific policies and regulations of the Shoreline Master Program. Cedar River A: Public physical access from a trail parallel to the water should be ,/ provided if the Renton Municipal Airport redevelops in the future, balanced with goals of ecological restoration. S. Building and Development Location -Shoreline Orientation Shoreline developments shall locate the water-dependent, water-related, and water-enjoyment portions of their developments along the shoreline. Development and use shall be designed in a manner that directs land alteration to the least sensitive portions of the site to maximize vegetation conservation; minimize impervious surfaces and runoff; protect riparian, nearshore and wetland habitats; protect wildiife and habitats; protect archaeological, historic and cultural resources; and preserve aesthetic values. Location of Development: Development and use shall be designed in a manner that ,/ directs land alteration to the least sensitive portions of the site. Staff Comment: The aircraft parking stalls are proposed primarily in areas of existing impervious surfaces and located across E Perimeter Road from the OHWM of the City 0/ Renton Department 0/ coma & Economic Development Apron A 737 C1 Max DATE OF PERMIT: April 4, 2016 • Shoreline Management Permit LUA16-000028, ECF,SM Page 7 of 11 Cedar River. Due ta the location and physical separation from the riparian shoreline by the road the location is less sensitive than non-developed areas. Minimization of Site Alteration: Development shall minimize site alteration in sites with substantial unaltered natural features by applying the following criteria: (a) Vehicle and pedestrian circulation systems shall be designed to limit clearing, grading, and alteration of topography and natural features. (b) Impervious surfacing for parking lot/space areas shall be limited through the use of under-building parking or permeable surfaces where feasible. N/A (c) Utilities shall share roadway and driveway corridors and rights-of-way wherever feasible. (d) Development shall be located and designed to avoid the need for structural shoreline stabilization over the life of the development. Exceptions may be made for the limited instances where stabilization is necessary to protect allowed uses, particularly water-dependent uses, where no alternative locations are available and no net loss of ecological functions will result. Location for Accessory Development: Accessory development or use that does not require a shoreline location shall be located outside of shoreline jurisdiction unless such development is required to serve approved water-oriented uses and/or developments or unless otherwise allowed in a High Intensity designation. When -/ sited within shoreline jurisdiction, uses and/or developments such as parking, service buildings or areas, access roads, utilities, signs and storage of materials shall be located inland away from the land/water interface and landward of water- oriented developments and/or other approved uses unless a location closer to the water is reasonably necessary. Navigation and Recreation to Be Preserved: Shoreline uses shall not deprive other -/ uses of reasonable access to navigable waters. Existing water-related recreation shall be preserved. 6. Standards for Density, Setbacks, and Height Setbacks and buffers from the OHWM: Pursuant to RMC 4-3-090 f. Aviation, ii. Airports: All facilities that are non-water-dependent shall be located outside of shoreline jurisdiction, if feasible. When sited within shoreline jurisdiction, uses and/or developments such as parking, hangars, service buildings or areas, access roads, utilities, signs, and storage of materials shall be located as far from the land/water interface as feasible. The minimum setback shall be twenty feet (20') from the OHWM of the shoreline and shall be designed and spaced to allow viewing of airport activities from the area along the water's edge. ------------- City of Renton Department 0/ comay & Economic Development Apron A 737 C1 Mox • Shoreline Management Permit LUA16-000028, ECF,SM DATE OF PERMIT: April 4, 2016 Page 8 of 11 Staff Comment: The two aircraft porking stalls cannot be located any further from the OHWM or they would encroach on existing airport taxiways and the runway. The subject proposal is located more than 20 feet from the OHWM. The proposed aircraft parking stalls and associated structures would comply with the setbacks applied to the Airpart .. Vegetation Conservation Buffer: 100 feet. Staff Comment: Pursuant to RMC 4-3-090F.l.h. Exemption Criteria, for development Exempt proposed on sites seporated from the shoreline by intervening and lawfully created public raad the requirement of this Code for vegetatian buffer may be waived. The subject site is separated fram the OHWM af the river by E Perimeter Raad. N/A Building Height -Maximum: In water -35 ft. Within 100 feet of OHWM -35 ft. More than 100 feet from the OHWM -35 ft. Height up to that established in chapter 4-2 RMC, Zoning Districts -Uses and Standards, may be allowed for non-water-dependent uses in the following reaches: Lake Washington Reaches C, H, I, and J; Cedar River Reaches A, B, and C; Black River Reach A; May Creek Reach B; and Springbrook Creek Reaches B, C, and D: For buildings landward of one hundred feet (100') from OHWM, the maximum building height shall be defined by a maximum allowable building height envelope that shall: i. Begin along a line laying parallel to and one hundred feet (100') from OHWM at a height of either thirty five feet (35') or one half (1/2) the maximum height allowed in the underlying zone, whichever is greater; and ii. Have an upward, landward transition at a slope of one vertical to one horizontal from the beginning height either (a) until the line at which the maximum height allowed in the underlying zoning in chapter 4-2 RMC is reached (from which line the height envelope shall extend landward at the maximum height allowed in the underlying zoning), or (b) to the end of shoreline jurisdiction, whichever comes first. Impervious area within the Buffer/Setback: 5% Staff Camment: See comments above under vegetotion conservation buffer. Impervious area within 100 feet of the OHWM: 50% N/A Footnote 11: No limit for the Renton Municipal Airport. Staff Comment: See comments abave under vegetatian conservation buffer. ,--------------------------------------------------- City 0/ Renton Department of com.y & Economic Development Apron A 737 C1 Max • Shoreline Management Permit LUA16-000028, ECF, SM DATE OF PERMIT: April 4, 2016 Page 9 of 11 7. Use Regulations: a. Industrial Use: Industrial developments shall be permitted subject to the following Existing Non-Water-Dependent Uses: Existing non-water-dependent uses may be retained and expanded, subject to provisions for nonconforming uses activities and sites; provided, that expansion of structures within the required setback between the building and the water shall be prohibited unless it is demonstrated that the impacts of the expansion can be mitigated through on-site measures, such as buffer enhancement or low impact stormwater development. Changes in use are limited to existing structures. Staff Comment: The existing Airport is a non-water dependent use, however the use has been legally established. The Airport has been identified os an essential public focility and would be exempt from Buffers and Setbacks pursuant to RMC 3-4- 090D.7.d.vi. ,/ The projects comply with the development standards of the zone and shoreline designation. Pursuant to the nonconforming sites table on expansion of impervious surface by up to 1,000 SF or up to 10% (whichever is less) is required to install site improvements that protect the ecological functions and processes of the shoreline. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,020 SF. However, the applicant has proposed to balance the increase in impervious surface coverage at the site by removing impervious area elsewhere within 200 feet of Reach A of the Cedar River with a net result of no gain in impervious area within 200 feet of the river Reach. Therefore the impact of the additional impervious area is balanced and the project would not require any site changes per RMC4-10-09SF.1. Clustering of Non-Water-Oriented Uses: Any new use of facility or expansion of ,/ existing facilities shall minimize and cluster those water-dependent and water- related portions of the development along the shoreline and place inland all facilities which are not water-dependent. Over-Water Structures: Over-water structures are allowed only for those portions of N/A water-dependent industrial uses that require over-water facilities. Any over-water structure is water-dependent, is limited to the smallest reasonable dimensions, and is subject to shoreline conditional use approval. No Discharge Allowed: Each industrial use shall demonstrate that no spill or ,/ discharge to surface waters will result from the use or shall demonstrate in the permit application a specific program to contain and clean up spills or discharges of pollutants associated with the industrial use and activity. City 0/ Renton Department 0/ (omary & Economic Development Apron A 737 C1 Max DATE OF PERMIT: April 4, 2016 • Shoreline Management Permit LUA16-000028, ECF, SM Page 10 of 11 Staff Camment: The applicant has praposed separate storm drain systems for stalls A-9 and A-lO. Bath stall are propased ta incarparate a collectian system using slot drains and catch basins, with treatment train cansisting af oil-water separators and StomFilters, and then discharge through the existing storm drain into the Cedar River. Both stalls would have fuel spill and hydraulic fluid spill diversion and containment facilities. In the case of de-icing, an automated valve would route the de-icing liquid into a sanitary API separator. The Deicing runoff would be rauted to the sanitary sewer system for treatment. Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the four SEPA mitigation measures issued with the Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated 2. All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened. This Permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition(s) hereof. 3. Construction permits shall not be issued until twenty-one (21) days after approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology or until any review proceedings initiated within this twenty-one (21) day review period have been completed. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: Department of Community & Economic Development APPEALS: Appeals of Shoreline Substantial Development Permit issuance must be made directly to the Shorelines Hearings Board. Appeals are made by filing a request in writing within the twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the final order and concurrently filing copies of such request with the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office as ------------------------------------------------------------, City oj Renton Department oj [om.ty & Economic Development Apron A 737 C1 Mox DATE OF PERMIT: April 4, 2016 • Shoreline Management Permit WA16-000028, ECF, SM Page 11 of 11 provided in section 18(1) of the Shorelines Management Act of 1971. All copies of appeal notices shall also be filed with the City of Renton Planning Division and the City Clerk's office. RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. EXPIRATION: Unless a different time period is specified in the shoreline permit as authorized by RCW 90.58.143 and subsection J1 of RMC 4-9-190, construction activities, or a use or activity, for which a permit has been granted pursuant to this Master Program must be commenced within two (2) years of the effective date of a shoreline permit, or the shoreline permit shall terminate, and a new permit shall be necessary. However, the Planning Division may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed with the Planning Division before the expiration date, and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record and the Washington State Department of Ecology. DEFINITION OF COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES: the construction applications must be submitted, permits must be issued, and foundation inspections must be completed before the end of the two (2) year period. ExhibitS/Attachments: SEPA Environmental Review Report and associated Exhibits 1-18, which include stream and habitat studies, lighting impingement studies, plan sets, etc. cc: Attorney General's Office Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. City of Renton, Municipal Airport / Owner Mark Clement, Applicant/Contact City of Renton Official File City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT I I MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 206 617- 2944 NAME: City of Renton Mark.d.clement@boeing.com ADDRESS: 1011 Perimeter RD W PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME Apron A 737 C11 MAX CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER: 4254307400 616 W PERIMETER RD 98055 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Mark Clement KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 072305-9007 COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing EXISTING LAND USE(S): Manufactoring. Airport ADDRESS: PO Box 3707 MC lW-09 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Manufactoring, Airport CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98124 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION TELEPHONE NUMBER 206617-2944 (if applicable): NA CO NT ACT PERSON EXISTING ZONING 1M NAME: Mark Clement PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): same as existing SITE AREA (in square feet): 13,650 COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing Co. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED:none ADDRESS: PO Box 3707 MC lW-09 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: CITY: Renton ZIP: 98124 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET , ACRE (if applicable): NA NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NA Q:web/pw/dcvserv/forms/planning/mastcrapp,doc 01111/16 ----------------------- • • PFi)JECT INFORMATION (conti(;ed) , NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA PROJECT VALUE: 8 MILLION IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA 0 AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL 0 AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): 1560 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable) :360 0 SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES 13,650 _ sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if 0 WETLANDS sq. ft. applicable):same NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): 100 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach le~al description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE -ne QUARTER OF SECTION 7_, TOWNSHIP _23n_, RANGE_5e_. IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 3. ---- 4. 2. - Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ Billed_ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) (YI,AXJ): C' e M r rJt , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or --==-the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and a wars herein tain and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowled~ ,nd belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Yy\o... of' ~ L..\ -e.. ~"-'+ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/heritheir free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. :\.'\"\\\\1 .............. III .$" ~ R, MOl-,: "" ~ f....~ ......... \""~\"trr"4 II/ :: ~ §'~oN, eX~/.'III" ~ :: ,:O::~ ~Mc 'i'",~, ~ ~ -...., =.'Ii 0 r dI ~ ;..0: Q ~ ~ ~:E ~ ~ ~ Z ~ . ~ \ .".. ::0 II ...." Notary (Pnnt) • ...X""-'. ~~~\) ~ " ,,0:; -/, --" ~ IlU'6V ..... : J: :: '" I, A"v -v - Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary C) I I ", fj')/-'IIII, B 2'" ~~-~ .: () "(}l f"'\....4\ 0 '/1/ .-<fr. ItLI\\\~\\\"'\"""''''<;:.X' g My appointment expires: !ES!. 0 11// E: OF '/III" .... .::- 11," 1\ \"" ", .... " Q:web/pw/dcvservlforms/planninglmasterapp.doc 2 01111116 • • City of Renton Shoreline Permit Project Narrative (updated 02/28/16) Apron A CI Project Proiect Name, Size, and Location The project is the 737 Max Flightline Utilities -Apron A CI Project. The project owner is Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle District, and the project location is the City of Renton -Renton Municipal Airport. Boeing has leased property from Renton Airport, and Boeing will make required infrastructure improvements to support the increased production rates required for the Boeing MAX CI Program (737 production). The site is located midfield on the eastside of Runway 16/34 between the taxiway and the east perimeter road. The area is largely flat impervious pavement used for aircraft parking. The site is fenced from public access. Since the property is located on the airfield, planning use is largely designated in the Airport Master Plan. The Master Plan is dated 1997 and is currently being updated. The new master plan will be reviewed and approved by various local, regional, state and federal agencies to permit long range programming. Zoning Designation of Site and Adjacent Properties The zoning designation for the property per the Renton Zoning Code is Medium Industrial (1M), with Comprehensive Plan Designation as Urban Center-North 2 (UC-N2). Current Use of Site and Existing Improvements The current use of the site is a single Boeing aircraft stall, stall A-9. The stall is used for de-icing and includes a blast fence on the north and south side of the stall. The area has concrete and asphalt pavement, and associated parking and fencing. Existing buildings include a crew shelter and several sheds used for tool and equipment storage. The site has existing infrastructure improvements including sewer, water, electrical and storm available for tie-in. See figure 1 on the next page. 10f4 .. ' • • Figure 1: Existing Improvements Special Site Features (Wetlands, Water Bodies, Steep Slopes) The Cedar River is located within 100' of the eastern edge of the project site. Soil Type and Drainage Conditions Soil conditions for the site indicate soils up to 15 feet thick of fine to medium sand and silt. A lens of peat was encountered in two of the borings, at depths of 15 and 30 feet, Groundwater depths are expected to be 3-5 feet below predeveloped ground surface, and will fluctuate with the season and precipitation. Footing subgrades will be designed and prepared in accordance with the geotechnical report recommendations. If loose or unstable soils are encountered during construction the subgrade will be over-excavated as required by the geotechnical engineers, Stormwater upgrades will use City of Renton or Boeing details as applicable. The storm system will capture pavement flows and route the runoff to oil water separator!s) and storm filter vaults as required to meet discharge criteria, A lift station will be required to discharge stormwater flows to the downstream system. During de-icing operations, flows will be directed to a separate vault system, and discharged to sanitary sewer, A lift station will be required to discharge sanitary flows to the downstream system. A drainage report is included with this application and contains additional required details related to the storm water conveyance system. 20f4 '" • • In addition to stormwater features, the apron aircraft parking positions that will park fueled aircraft will have trench grates to collect a fuel spill should it occur. The fuel will be directed to a 10,000 gallon fuel containment vault The flow will be directed to the vault using an emergency button accessible at the apron, Proposed Use of the Property and Scope of the Proposed Development The site will be upgraded with infrastructure improvements to support the parking of two (2) Boeing 737 aircraft, Each stall will be able to accommodate de-icing operations, Improvements include pavement repair and replacement, aircraft parking support infrastructure including water, air, electrical, lighting and storm water drainage improvements; and a support structures tool room, The existing crew shelter will be relocated, Two existing blast fences will be relocated to the east side of the stall. New pavement will extend north of the existing into the grass field, The pervious surface eliminated by this new pavement will be planted elsewhere on Boeing maintained property, in order to maintain no net loss of pervious surface in the shoreline zone, Proposed Structures and utilities in the 200' Shoreline Zone Building structures One new building will be installed for crew operations; one small crew shelter will be relocated as follows: • 1 each 24'x65', 15'ft H new super cabana building, • 1 each 12'x 30' 12'ft H existing modular crew shelter will be relocated approx 120' ft to the north Utilities /structures • 2 each -122'6",12'4" H existing blast fences will be relocated within the apron, • 2 each -existing light stands on 16' high poles with concrete bases will be relocated within the Apron, with the fixtures directed toward the Apron and pointed away from the Cedar River. • 2 each -new light stand on 16' high pole with concrete bases will be located within the Apron, with the fixtures directed toward the Apron and pointed away from the Cedar River. • 1 each -new 30ft high light stand next to the Super cabana with the fixtures pointing away from the Cedar river Cubic yards of grading 3,900 • Concrete = 2,300 CY • Base = 1,600 CY • Excavation = 3,900 CY (For pavement section reconstruction) LF of all utilities and type • Domestic Water -540 LF • Sanitary Sewer -340 LF • Lighting -725' 30f4 •• • • • 208V Power stand -450' • 480V Power stand -450' • 400 Hz Power -630' • Telecomm line-275' • Storm pipe -1,450 lF S9 ft of impervious -pervious mitigation. • SF of new impervious pavement within 200 foot shoreline boundary = 8,020 SF • SF of new pervious landscaping within 200 foot shoreline boundary = 8,020 SF Access Access to the site will be via East Perimeter Road. Proposed Off-site improvements Offsite improvements are limited to new pavement along the south side of the compass calibration pad. This is located just outside of Boeing's lease area. Total Estimated Construction Cost Estimated construction cost is approximately $8 million. Trees to be removed No trees a re proposed to be removed. Estimated Quantities Concrete = 2,300 CY Aspha It = 1,600 CY land to be dedicated to the City None proposed. Proposed Job Shacks, Sales Trailers. and Model Homes A job shack may be provided on site during construction. Proposed Modifications None proposed. Information for Projects located within 200 feet of Cedar River The eastern edge of the site is approximately 50 feet from the OHW of the Cedar River. There are no existing or proposed residential units within the project site. 40f4 • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Apron A CI project 2. Name of applicant: The Boeing Company 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Boeing Commercial Airplanes Attention: Mark Clement Facilities Permits/land Use The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707, M/S 1W-09 Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 Phone: 206-617-2944 4. Date checklist prepared: Jan 2016 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction activities are anticipated to begin in April 2016 and are expected to be completed by late 2016 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The following documents have been or will be prepared for the project: • Stream study-AMEC • Geotechnical Report,-S&EE • Technical Information Report -Dowl group • Flood report -Dowl group • Lighting Impingement study-Casne Engineering ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1 11191'2016 ----------- • • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, NONE KNOWN 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Federal • 7460 • NEPA State • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Stormwater General Permit King County • Industrial Wastewater Construction Dewatering Permit City of Renton • Environmental Review • Civil Engineering Review • Construction ( Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire protection) and Building Permits, 11. GIve brIef, complete descrIption of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and sIte. There are several questIons later In this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencIes may modify this form to include additional specific Information on project description.) The site will be upgraded with infrastructure improvements to support the parking of two (2) Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall will be able to accommodate de-icing operations. Improvements Include pavement repair and replacement, aircraft parking support infrastructure including water, air, sanitary sewer, electrical, lighting and storm water drainage Improvements; and a support structures tool room. The existing crew shelter and will be relocated north. Two existing blast fences will be relocated to the east side of the stall. One super crew shelter will be installed outside the 200ft shoreline zone New pavement will extend north of the existing into the grass field. The pervious surface eliminated by this new pavement will be planted elsewhere on Boeing maintained property, in order to maintain no net loss of pervious surface in the shoreline zone. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2 1/1912016 ,----------------------------- • • to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport on Boeing (leased property) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): IE§!J rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soil type is primarily sandy silt loam. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the Immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes, the City of Renton has identified the area as presenting a seismic hazard due to potential liquefaction during a seismic event. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Excavation for utilities and fill of clean native soil for compaction. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, soils will be exposed during project construction presenting a risk for erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 98% of the site is currently covered with impervious surfaces. There will be no increase in impervious due to the project h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A temporary erosion and sediment control plan will be developed consistent with City of Renton standards to identify the temporary erosion control measures that will be used by contractor. These elements may include minimizing exposed soils, stabilizing exposed soils, using erosion control fences, inlet protection and other typical best management practices. The project will obtain coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit through Ecology and will be required to maintain a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, install, inspect and maintain erosion control ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3 1/1912018 2. Air • • features on the site, monitor discharges and submit discharge monitoring reports to Ecology. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and exhaust from construction equipment will be generated during project construction activities. The completed project will not result in any change in existing operational air emissions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. There are no off-site sources of emissions or odor that will affect the proposed project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other Impacts to air, If any: Mitigation measures to reduce emissions Include ensuring that machines and equipment used during construction are well maintained and employ legally required emission control equipment. ,Dust will be minimized through use of appropriate best management practices to the activities that may create dust, such as wetting of exposed soils or utilization of tools equipped with dust collection systems. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or In the immediate vicinity of the site (Including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Lake Washington is located to the north of the site. The Cedar River is located to the west of the project site and drains to Lake Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Part of the project is on the 200ft shoreline zone (see attached drawings for details) 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are proposed with the project. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 4 1/1912016 ,---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • • 5} Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. FEMA Community Panel Nos. 53033C0664 and 53033C0977F indicate that the project site is not located within a special flood hazard area. 6} Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. The proposed project does not involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground: 1} Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Dewatering will be necessary in order to construct and utilities trenching. Bore sample testing has been conducted across the site to confirm groundwater elevations. See Geotech report for information on groundwater levels 2} Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. There will be no discharges to the ground from septic tanks and other sources c. Water runoff (including storm-water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (Including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff will result from stormwater generated on the project site. In the existing and proposed conditions, site drainage sheet flows to piped conveyance systems. In the existing conditions oil/water separation is provided. The proposed condition oil/water separation and a water quality vaults. Drainage from the site outfalls to Cedar River, This treatment system will be located within a centrally located site drainage basin. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The only potential for waste material is from accidental spills of fuel or other liquids during project construction. The contractor will be required to maintain spill kits on site to address potential spills during construction and Boeing has an established spill prevention and counter measures program for site operations. All storm water drain inlets in and around the ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 5 1/1912018 • • proposed construction operations and staging areas will be protected with inlet protection BMP. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Existing drainage patterns for the site will be retained. Drainage from the project will continue to be conveyed to existing stormwater outfalls that discharge to Cedar River. The Cedar River is an exempt surface water, as classified by the Washington State Department of Ecology; and therefore, flow control for the project is not required. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: I:8J Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: Cottonwood I:8J Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other I:8J Shrubs I:8JGrass o Pasture o Crop or grain o Wet soli plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, Other: reed canary grass, soft rush, slough sedge o Water plants: water Illy, eelgrass, milfoll, other o Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? See project landscaped plans c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Migratory Salmon, steelhead in nearby Cedar River d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, If any: New landscaping near parking areas 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, Iherolll. ea I songbirds, other: beagulISl,lcrowSl Mammals: deer, bear, elk, eave other: Fish: bass, lSalmollL trou herring, shellfish, other: I'ong fin sme/4 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Puget Sound Steelhead and their status are under the ESA, the species is listed as "threatened," as are Puget Sound Chinook salmon and coastal/Puget Sound bull trout. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes, the site is part of the Pacific Flyway; see the 2003 Boeing EIS. Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Puget Sound steelhead trout, coho salmon, sockeye ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6 1/1912018 • • salmon, coastal cutthroat trout, and non-anadroumous rainbow trout use the Cedar River and Lake Washington as migration routes. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Redirecting exterior lighting away from the Cedar River and toward the Airport Apron. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, If any: Energy efficient lighting systems. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not Applicable b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? No existing noise sources would affect the proposed project. The project is located adjacent to the Renton airport runway and there is noise from landing and departing aircraft. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment noise 6:00 AM TO 5:00 PM Monday through Saturday ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 7 1119/2016 • • 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Contractors will be required to comply with the provisions of WAC 173-60 during construction. All engine-powered equipment will be required to have mufflers installed according to the manufacturers' specification. All equipment will be required to comply with relevant equipment noise standards of the US Environmental Protection Agency. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site adjacent to the parcel Is currently used by the Boeing Airplane Programs as a manufacturing site for the Boeing Next-Generation 737 commercial airplane. The site includes approximately 4.3 million square feet of building space in multiple buildings, outdoor storage and logistics yards, site access roads, parking and other improvements. The site has been used by Boeing since 1941. The project site is bounded to the north by Lake Washington, to the west by perimeter road. To the east the airport landing strips and to the south is airport way b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Small airport office buildings and crew shelters. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? no e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 1M f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The comprehensive plan designation for this property is Urban Center-North. Adjacent plan designations are the same as the project site, with the exception of property to the west, which is designated as Employment Area Industrial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The Cedar River and Lake Washington are shorelines of the state and subject to the Shoreline Management Act. The City's Shoreline Master Program (SMP) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 8 111912018 • • designates the project area as Shoreline High Intensity and it is in Cedar River Reach A and Lake Washington reaches I and J. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, the Cedar River and Lake Washington are identified as environmentally sensitive areas. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Varies, j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal are compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project is compatible with the existing and projected land uses and plans for the site as an airplane manufacturing and assembly facility. No sllecific measures are planned. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-Income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-Income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not Applicable 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s}, not including antennas; 15ft What is the principal exterior building material(s} proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping Screening 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9 111912016 • • Apron operational lighting, varies b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: New lighting spread will be directed downward towards aircraft and the ground 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are In the immediate vicinity? The Cedar River shoreline trail and park are within the general area of the Renton Site. The Cedar River is used for fishing and boating. The Renton Rowing club operates upstream of the project site and the Renton City Boathouse is located to the northeast. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts on recreation, Including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not Applicable 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No structures of historical significance have been identified on the project site. The Washington State Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data does not identify any properties within the project area as being on the historic property inventory or register. Mitigation measures identified below will need to be implemented during construction if archaeological resources are encountered during construction. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None have been identified on the project site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Should any unknown archaeological resources be encountered during project activities, ground-disturbing activities will be halted in the area of the find in ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 10 111912016 ,--------------------- • • accordance with RCW 27.53.060 (Archaeological Sites and Resources) and RCW 27.44.020 (Indian Graves and Records). A professional archaeologist will be called in to assess the significance of the find, and the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia will be notified so that a course of action can be implemented. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attachment. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? private shuttle c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project elimInate? No change to existing parking d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally descrIbe. Yes, the project utilizes the Renton Municipal Airport and a rail spur for facility operations. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No public trips g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Private shuttle through private road 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not Applicable 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 11 1119/2016 • • All utilities are currently available at the site, except Septic b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. Electrical power and diesel will be used for construction equipment. Metro Sewer, City of Seattle water, Puget Sound Energy. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I Understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature:--,--:-:---=:--:::-:-__________ _ Mark D. Clement Date Submitted: ______________ _ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 12 1/1912016 Washington Stat~ .. . ':' · Departmentof Ecology· . ; . .• Environmental,Review Section.' ,," :.:, . ,Y '. PO Box 47703 '. Olympia; WA 98S04"7703 ..... ,'-, · Subject:·" ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAlniRESHOLD DETERiviINATION~'. '. '. • r .. ' Transmitted herewith is a copy.of the En~ifonmental· Determin'ation for the following . '. projectreviewed by the Eri~irorim~nMReview Committee (ERe) on Marctl14, 2016:' . ' '". ,,' :,' ,": "'''', .," "",,' ", '. '" " :" ",,~ ,"., '-"'-' " ,", .. ".; -"" ,', , :." . SEPADETERMINATION: .... Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNSM) ..• ' '. PROJECT NAME:; Apron A737Cl MAX .. , " ~ROJECTNUMBER:. • ... LUAi6-0000Z8; ECF,SM ., " .. ,'1.. . .;' '. Appeals oftheerivir'onmental determin~tlonmustbe fiiedlnwdting onor before 5:00 · p.in:·onApril'l; i016, t~gettie,rwittith~req~iredf~e with: Hearing Examiner; Cityof~ ." Renton; 1055 SouthGraclyWaY,Re,ritO!l;WA98057 .. Appealsto the Exami(ler are." '.' governed by RMC4~8-110and'infor~ationrEigarding the appeal process may be·' . obtained fromthe Cityi::lerWs Office, (425)430,6510: . . · Please refer to theenclos~dNotice of Environmental Determinati6nfor complete" . details. If you have questions,please call me at (425) 430-7314; Forthe Environmental Review Committee; A/-Doll-~-. . f~ aeJl-. Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager· Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry fisher, WDfW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov '" ' ", . ",' ". ; . ·0 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ·0 ----~~~-e'lfJ7ll1""'n-t=o-:;:-n---=® ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA16-000028, ECF, SM APPLICANT: Mark Clement, The Boeing Company PROJECT NAME: Apron A 737 Cl MAX PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to provide two aircraft parking positions and associatec' infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall would be able to accommodate de-icing operations: The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 616 W Perimeter Rd. The site is 13,650 SF an9 is zoned Industrial Medium (1M). Site improvements would include pavement repair and replacement infrastructure including, water, air, electrical, lighting and stormwater drainage improvements. onJ new 1,560 SF super cabana building and 20 ft. light stand are proposed and the relocation of two bias fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew sheiter. Overail the project would increase imperioli coverage by 8,020 SF and result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading. The site is located within a seismi· hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A the Cedar River Shoreline i designated as High Intensity at the project location. PROJECT LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Rd LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significa;1 adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RC'. 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee uncEI their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environment~ impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, t~. lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 1, 2016. Appe2" must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Wi!" Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtainE'L from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. , (). DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Kelly Beym r, Ad Istrator Community Services Department ---..---~lrenton ® MARCH 18, 2016 MARCH 14, 2016 Date Fire & Emergency Services Jln //~ T.I Date Cz. \ Jv-r xt-~ /, ilL <e C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator I I Department of Community & Date Economic Development • () DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ·0 --------"lZenton ® DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNSM) MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES PROJECT NUMBER: LUA16-000028, ECF, SM APPLICANT: Mark Clement, The Boeing Company PROJECT NAME: Apron A 737 C1 MAX PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to provide two aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall would be able to accommodate de- icing operations. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 616 W Perimeter. Rd. The site is 13,650 SF and is zoned Industrial Medium (1M). Site improvements would include pavement repair and replacement, infrastructure including, water, air, eleqrical, lighting and stormwater drainage improvements. One new 1,560 SF super cabana. building·and 20 ft. light stand are proposed and the relocation of two blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,020 SF and result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A the Cedar River Shoreline is designated as High Intensity at the project location. PROJECT LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Rd LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Standard Stream Study Narrative and Habitat Data Report, prepared by AMEC Foster Wheeler, dated March 2016. 2. The proposed landscaped areas identified in Exhibit 6, shall be installed and inspected by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to the addition of impervious surface in Apron A. 3. The applicant provide the City and the Muckleshoot Tribe a follow up lighting study, following the conclusion of the project, documenting that the new lights have not increased artificial lighting levels on the lower Cedar River. If the study identifies increased lighting levels changes would be required to the new and/or existing lights in Apron A to reduce the levels to be equal or less than current conditions. ~. 4. If any Native American grave(s) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found all construction activity shall stop in accordance with RCW 27;53.060 and 27.44.020, and theowner/developer shall immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. ADIVISORY NOTES: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the oppeal process for the land use actions. PLAN -Planning Review-Land Use Version 1 I March 14,2016 Engineering Review Comments Contact: Vicki Grover 1425-430-7291 1 vgrover@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: I have completed a review for the above referenced proposal located at parcel 0723059007. WATER 1. Water service is provided by the City of Renton. The plans show Installation of a new fire hydrant. reset of an existing fire hydrant and water services to buildings 5 440 and 5 424. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. Sewer connections are proposed to the 2 new buildings (5 440 and 5424) and a sewer lift station is proposed but it Is unclear from the plans where the lift station Is pumping to.... Needs to be clarified. The City will need to work with Boeing to secure a way to bill for sewer usage. SURFACE WATER 2: A drainage report complying with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM, was submitted from DOWL dated January 2016. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard, Existing Site Conditions. A Full Drainage Review was included in the report and shows the site receiving Basic Water Quality however, per the 2009 COR Amendments to the KCSWDM on page 1 63, Enhanced Water Quality is required as well as an onsite flow control BMP. The report also states the project is exempt from flow control, the report must include the criteria from page 1 37 in the 2009 KCSWDM. The report shall Include a table of pre developed, pervious and Impervious areas as well as developed, pervious and impervious areas. Per Core Requirement #2, all projects shall submit an offslte analysis. The conveyance calculations shall include pipe capacity analysis for the connection into the existing 18 inch concrete gravity line. The project will need to submit an adjustment for approval by the Engineering and Development Manager for the two pump systems separately from the report. Apron C required ductile Iron storm pipe and this requirement will apply to this project as well. Adding boots to the catch basin! pipe connections will be applicable to prevent infiltration of groundwater into the conveyance system. Pump station documents shall be included in the O&M Manual. The final drainage plan and drainage report must be submitted with the utility construction permit application. 3. Surface water system development fee (SOC) will be applicable. The current rate of SOC fee $0.594 per square foot of new impervious surface area, but not less than $1,485.00. 4. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology will be required if grading and clearing of the site exceeds one acre. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Is required for this site. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. Not Applicable. 2. A note shall be added to the plan that follows the FAA Circular No. 150/5380 6C; and similar to the note added to the Apron C plans. ERe Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 2 of 3 • o • ,~ 3. Paving and trench restoration will comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements. General Comments 1. Ail construction or service utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shail conform to the Renton Drafting Standards, Plans shail be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When utility plans are complete, please submit four (4) caples of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. Planning Review Comments Contact: Vanessa Dolbee 1425-430-73141 vdolbee@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Planning Comments: 1. RMC section 4 4 030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m, and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'ciock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or-cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Altemative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. 5. This permit is shall comply with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The permitted is responsible for adhering to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (2007) and lor your U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permit. ERe Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 3 of 3 • • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Department of Community & Economic Development (CEO) -Planning Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: January 20, 2016 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA16-000028, ECF, SM PROJECT NAME: Boeing Apron A 737 C1 MAX PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to provide two aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall would be able to accommodate de·icing operations. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 616 W Perimeter Rd. The site is 13,650 SF and is zoned Industrial Medium (1M). Site improvements would include pavement repair and replacement, infrastructure including, water, air, electrical, lighting and stormwater drainage improvements. One new 1,560 SF super cabana building and 20 ft. light stand are proposed and the relocation of two blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,200 SF and result in 3,990 cubic yards of grading. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A the Cedar River Shoreline is designated as High Intensity at the project location. PROJECT LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Rd OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-MI: As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110, the City of Renton Is using the Optional ONS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS~M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M). This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: CONSISTENcY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: January 14, 2016 January 20, 2016 Mark Clement, The BoeinB Co./ PO Box 3707 MC lW.(J9/ Seattle, WA 98124/206-617-2944 Environmental (SEPA) Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit None DralnSBe report; Geotechnical Report; Stream/Lake Study (Standard or Supplementall Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) -Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 980S7 The subject site is designated COMp·EA on the City of Renton Comprehensive land Use Map and 1M on the City's Zoning Map. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, CEO -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Boeing Apron A 737 C1 MAX/LUA16-000028, ECF, SM NAME: ______________________________________________________________ ___ MAILING ADDRESS: _____________________________ City/State/Zip: ___________________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: _________________________ _ • Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed Mitigation Measures: • Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, 4-2-130 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 4-3-090 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM REGULATIONS, 4-9-070 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project Impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included In the Stream Study Narrative and Habitat Data Report, prepared by AMEC Foster Wheeler, dated January 2016. Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Vanessa Dalbee, Current Planning Manager, CEO -Planning DivisIon, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on February 3, 2016. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination is available upon request. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager; Tel: (425) 430- 7314; Eml: vdolbee@rentonwa.gov If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, ceo -Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No.: Boeing Apron A 737 C1 MAX/lUA16-OO0028, ECF, SM NAME: ______________________________________________________________ ___ MAILING ADDRESS: ________________ City/State/Zip: __________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: ______________ __ Agencies Mark Clement, The Boeing Company Jennifer Flathman City of Renton (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ) SS ) See Attached Applicant Party of Record Owner I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sabrina Mirante signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary (Print):_~""""''''''':':='''':c.!...:=::'''''....::IE::::'':....l.....!....'''':;:::~?R...3:._~~;--* __ My appointment expires: Apron A 737 C1 MAX LUA16-000028, ECF, SM template ~ affidavit of selVice by mailing • Dept. of Ecology "" Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504·7703 WSDOT Northwest Region" Attn: Ramin Pazookl King Area Dev. Serv., MS·240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133·9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers· Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C·3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers ••• Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504·7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 35030 SE Douglas St. #210 Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street KSC·TR·0431 Seattle, WA 98104·3856 Seattie Public Utilities Jalaine Madura, Attn: SEPA Responsible Official 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124·4018 ----------------------- • AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology"" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept." Attn: Misty Blair Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 39015 _172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504·7703 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office· Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program •• 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Laura Murphy Seattie, WA 98106·1514 39015172 nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092·9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division· Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program •• Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Erin Slaten Ms. Shirley Marroquin 39015172'" Avenue SE 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC·NR·050 Auburn, WA 98092·9763 Seattle, WA 98104·3855 WDFW· Larry Fisher" Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation· 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Gretchen Kaehler Issaquah, WA 98027 PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504·8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Charlene Anderson, AICP, ECD Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Kent, WA 98032·5895 Newcastle, WA 980S6 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr. Jack Pace, Responsible Official 355 110" Ave NE 6200 Southcenter 81vd. Mailstop EST 11W Tukwila, WA 98188 Believue, WA 98004 Puget Sound Energy Doug Corbin, Municipal Liaison Mgr. 6905 South 228" St Kent, WA 98032 "Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. ··Oepartment of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov •• Karen Walter, Laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email addresses: KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us Ilaura.murohy@muckleshoot.nsn.usL erin.slaten@muckleshoot.nsn.us ···Oepartment of Natural Resources Is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing --------------------------------------------------------------- City of Renton 1055 5 Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Jennifer Flathman 701 Fifth Ave, Suite 4120 Seattle, WA 98104 Mark Clement The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 MC 1W-09 Seattle, WA 98124 • ". . . .1.. __ _ ___ ~De~_~~~ ... raw ___ ~-·IIIU'_1~1~ - March 16, 2016 . . Community & E~onomiC Develop~ent 'D~partment' Mark Clement· .The Boeing Company, POBox 3707 MC 1W-09 Seattle, WA 98124" CE."Chip"Viricent,Administrator .. , . SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAI.THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. Boeing Apron A 737 Cl MAX, LUA16-000028, ECF, SM, Dear Mr. Clement: This letter is written on behalf ofthe Environmental Review Co'mmittee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject p~oject and have issued. a . threshold Determination of Non-SignificancecMitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to,the enclosed ERC Report, for a list of the Mitigation Measures: Appeals ofth~ environmental determination must be filed inwriting on or before.5:00 p.m .. on April 1, 2016, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South GradyWay, Renton, WA:98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regardingthe appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-65io .. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any further questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager Enclosure cc: City of Renton / Owner!,) Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Denis Law . Mayor .-. March 16, 2016 '. i C.E. "Chip"Vi ncent, Administrator 'wash il)gton S~at~ , Department of Ecology . Environmental Review Section" PO Box 47703 0lympia, WA '98504~77b3.· Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAl niRESHOLD DETERMINATION-' Tr~rismitted herewith is a copy of the En~ironmental Deterniination for the following' 'project reviewed by the 'En~ironmental Review Committee (ERC) on March 14, 2016: ' . . , . -. ., -. , ' . SEPADETERMINATION: Determination o(Non-Sigriificance Mitigated (DNSM) . . . .' . . . PROJECT NAME: . PROJECrNUMBER: Apron A,737 C1 MAX , LUA16-000028; ECF, SM ' , . Appeals ~f the environmental det~rmination must be filed in writing onor before 5:00 p.m:o~ April 1, 2016, together with the, required fee ~ith: Hearing Exaniiner, City of" ,Renton,' i055 South GradyWay, Rento(l; WA 9,8057 .. Appeals to the Examiner are' governed by RMC4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.' . Please ~eter to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Deter~ination for complete , details. If you have que~tions, please call me at (425) 430-7314: ' . . : For the Environ mental' Review Committee, .' ',-.., , ' ... ~-Do/~ Vanessa Dolbee ' current Planning Manager. ' Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division" Boyd Powers, Dep'artment of Natural Resources '. Karen Walter, Fisheries; Muckleshoot Indi~n l:ribe , . Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources,Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of .Archaeology"& Historic Pre.serv~tion Rami" Pazooki, WSOOT, NW.Region , Larry Fisher, WDFW . Duwamish Tribal Office . 'us Itrmy C'or-p.-'of Engin~ers . .. ", Renton City Hall·. 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, washington'98DS? • rentonwa.gov • • OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Apron A 737 Cl MAX PROJECT NUMBER: LUAl6-000028, ECF, SM LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Rd DESCRIPTION: THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND A SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO PROVIDE TWO AIRCRAFT PARKING POSITIONS AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE FOR BOEING 737 AIRCRAFT. EACH STALL WOULD BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE DE-ICING OPERATIONS. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED AT THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, 616 W PERIMETER RD. THE SITE IS 13,650 SF AND IS ZONED INDUSTRIAL MEDIUM (1M). SITE IMPROVEMENTS WOULD INCLUDE PAVEMENT REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT, INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDING, WATER, AIR, ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING AND STORMWATER DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. ONE NEW 1,560 SF SUPER CABANA BUILDING AND 20 FT. LIGHT STAND ARE PROPOSED AND THE RELOCATION OF TWO BLAST FENCES, 3 LIGHT STANDS, AND ONE 360 SF CREW SHELTER. OVERALL THE PROJECT WOULD INCREASE IMPERIOUS COVERAGE BY 8,020 SF AND RESULT IN 3,900 CUBIC YARDS OF GRADING. THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A SEISMIC HAZARD AREA AND ALONG THE CEDAR RIVER, A SHORELINE OF THE STATE. REACH A THE CEDAR RIVER SHORELINE IS DESIGNATED AS HIGH INTENSITY AT THE PROJECT LOCATION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION HAS PROBABLE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS THAT CAN BE MITIGATED THROUGH MITIGATION MEASURES. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before S:OO p.m. on April 1, 2016, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner .. City of Renton, lOSS South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (42S) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPERFILE.IDENTIFICATION. • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA16-000028, ECF, SM APPLICANT: Mark Clement, The Boeing Company PROJECT NAME: Apron A 737 C1 MAX PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to provide two aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall would be able to accommodate de-icing operations. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 616 W Perimeter Rd. The site is 13,650 SF and is zoned Industrial Medium (1M). Site improvements would include pavement repair and replacement, infrastructure including, water, air, electrical, lighting and stormwater drainage improvements. One new 1,560 SF super cabana building and 20 ft. light stand are proposed and the relocation of two blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,020 SF and result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A the Cedar River Shoreline is designated as High Intensity at the project location. PROJECT LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Rd LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-9-070D Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 1, 2016. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. DEPARTMENT OF COMMU. , AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: Kelly Beym r, Ad Istrator Community Services Department MARCH 18, 2016 MARCH 14, 2016 Date Date C£'\)k-~ ~ C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development Jhy lIe, rr Date DEPARTMENT OF CO"'UNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT . -- -----.....--.... Renton ® DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNSM) MITIGATION MEASURES AND ADVISORY NOTES PROJECT NUMBER: LUA16-000028, ECF, SM APPLICANT: Mark Clement, The Boeing Company PROJECT NAME: Apron A 737 C1 MAX PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to provide two aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall would be able to accommodate de- icing operations. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 616 W Perimeter Rd. The site is 13,650 SF and is zoned Industrial Medium (1M). Site improvements would include pavement repair and replacement, infrastructure including, water, air, electrical, lighting and stormwater drainage improvements. One new 1,560 SF super cabana building and 20 ft. light stand are proposed and the relocation of two blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,020 SF and result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A the Cedar River Shoreline is designated as High Intensity at the project location. PROJECT LOCATION: 616 W Perimeter Rd LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Standard Stream Study Narrative and Habitat Data Report, prepared by AMEC Foster Wheeler, dated March 2016. 2. The proposed landscaped areas identified in Exhibit 6, shall be installed and inspected by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to the addition of impervious surface in Apron A. 3. The applicant provide the City and the Muckleshoot Tribe a follow up lighting study, following the conclusion of the project, documenting that the new lights have not increased artificial lighting levels on the lower Cedar River. If the study identifies increased lighting levels changes would be required to the new and/or existing lights in Apron A to reduce the levels to be equal or less than current conditions. • • 4. If any Native American grave(s) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found all construction activity shall stop in accordance with RCW 27.53.060 and 27.44.020, and the owner/developer shall immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. ADIVISORY NOTES: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. PLAN· Planning Review· Land Use Version 1 I March 14,2016 Engineering Review Comments Contact: Vicki Grover 1425-430-7291 1 vgrover@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: I have completed a review for the above referenced proposal located at parcel 0723059007. WATER 1. Water service is provided by the City of Renton. The plans show installation of a new fire hydrant. reset of an existing fire hydrant and water services to buildings 5 440 and 5 424. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. Sewer connections are proposed to the 2 new buildings (5 440 and 5 424) and a sewer lift station is proposed but it is unclear from the plans where the lift station is pumping 10 .... Needs to be clarified. The City will need to work with Boeing to secure a way to bill for sewer usage. SURFACE WATER 2. A drainage report complying with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM. was submitted from DOWL daled January 2016. Based on the City's flow conlrol map. this site falls within the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard. Existing Site Conditions. A Full Drainage Review was included in the report and shows the site receiving Basic Water Qualily however. per Ihe 2009 COR Amendments to the KCSWDM on page 1 63. Enhanced Water Quality is required as well as an onsite flow conlrol BMP. The report also states the project is exempt from flow control. the report must include Ihe criteria from page 1 37 in the 2009 KCSWDM. The report shall include a table of pre developed. pervious and impervious areas as well as developed. pervious and impervious areas. Per Core Requirement #2, all projects shall submit an offslte analysis. The conveyance calculations shall include pipe capacity analysis for the connection into the existing 18 inch concrete gravity line. The project will need to submil an adjuslment for approval by the Engineering and Development Manager for the two pump systems separately from the report. Apron C required ductile iron storm pipe and this requirement will apply to this project as well. Adding boots to the catch basin/ pipe connections will be applicable to prevent infiltration of groundwater into the conveyance system. Pump station documents shall be included in the O&M Manual. The final drainage plan and drainage report must be submitted with the utility construction permil application. 3. Surface water system development fee (SDC) will be applicable. The current rate of SDC fee $0.594 per square fool of new impervious surface area, but not less than $1,485.00. 4. A Construclion Stormwater General Permit from Departmenl of Ecology will be required if grading and clearing of the sile exceeds one acre. A Stormwater Pollulion Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this site. TRANSPORTATION/STREET 1. Not Applicable. 2. A note shall be added to the plan that follows the FAA Circular No. 150/5380 6C; and similar to the note added 10 Ihe Apron C plans. ERe Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes Page 2 of 3 • • 3. Paving and trench restoration will comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements. General Comments 1. All construction or service utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall confonm to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When utility plans are complete, please submit four (4) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth fioor. Planning Review Comments Contact: Vanessa Dolbee 1425-430-73141 vdolbee@rentonwa.gov Recommendations: Planning Comments: 1. RMC section 4 4 030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Altemative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as speCified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Penmit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. 5. This penmit is shall comply with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The penmitted is responsible for adhering to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (2007) and lor your U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permit. ... ERe Mitigation Measures and AdviSOry Notes Page 3 of 3 ,----------------------- Department of Comneity and Economic Development NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNS-M) for the following project under the authority ofthe Renton municipal code. Apron A 737 C1 Max LUA16-000028 Location: 616 W Perimeter Rd. The applicant is proposing 2 aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall would be able to accommodate de-icing operations. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport. The site is 13,6S0 SF and is zoned 1M. Site improvements would include pavement repair and replacement, infrastructure including, water, air, electrical, lighting and stormwater drainage improvements. One new 1,560 SF super cabana building and 20 ft. light stand are proposed and the relocation of two blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,200 SF and result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Appeals of the DNS-M must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 01, 2016. Appeals must be fiied in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner c/o City Clerk, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 425-430-6510. Publication Date: March 18, 2016 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNI~ AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • --~""R'enton ® ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Project Number: Project Manager: Owner: Applicant/Contact: Project Location: Project Summary: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: March 14, 2016 Apron A 737 Cl Max LUA16-000028, ECF, SM Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager City of Renton, 1011 Perimeter Rd. W, Renton, WA 98055 Mark Clement, Boeing, PO Box 3707 MC lW-09, Seattle, WA 98124 616 W Perimeter Rd The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to provide two aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall would be able to accommodate de-icing operations. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 616 W Perimeter Rd. The site is 13,650 SF and is zoned Industrial Medium (1M). Site improvements would include pavement repair and replacement, infrastructure including, water, air, electrical, lighting and storm water drainage improvements. One new 1,560 SF super cabana building and 20 ft. light stand are proposed and the relocation of two blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,020 SF and result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A the Cedar River Shoreline is designated as High Intensity at the project location. 360SF Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): 13,650 SF Total Building Area GSF: 1,560 SF 1,560 SF 12,780 SF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Location Map ERC ReporC16-000028.docx028 • • City oj Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Environmental Review Committee Report APRON A 737 C1 MAX LUA16-00002B Report of March 14, 2016 Page 2 of 8 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION I BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to provide two aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft_ Each stall would be able to accommodate de-icing operations_ The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 616 W Perimeter Rd., approximately mid airfield on the eastside of Runway 16/34 between the taxiway and the East Perimeter road. The site is 13,650 SF and is zoned Industrial Medium (1M) and has a Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Employment Area (EA). The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A of the Cedar River Shoreline is designated as High Intensity at the project location. Currently the site is used as a single Boeing aircraft stall which includes de-icing operations and a blast fence on the north and south side of the stall. The existing area contains asphalt and associated parking, fencing, a crew shelter and several sheds used for tool and equipment storage. The existing infrastructure includes sewer, water, electrical and storm. The applicant has proposed site improvements which would include pavement repair and replacement, infrastructure including, water, air, electrical, lighting and storm water drainage improvements. One new . 1,560 SF super cabana building and 20 ft. light stand are proposed and the relocation of two blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. New pavement would extend north of the existing development into the existing grass field. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,020 SF and result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading. The applicant has proposed to balance the increase in impervious surface coverage at the site by removing impervious area elsewhere within 200 feet of Reach A of the Cedar River with a net result of no gain in impervious area within 200 feet of the river Reach. The applicant has indicated the project would result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading, 2,300 cubic yards for concrete, 1,600 cubic yards for base, and 3,900 cubic yard of excavation for pavement reconstruction. i PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Standard Stream Study Narrative and Habitat Data Report, prepared by AMEC Foster Wheeler, dated March 2016. ERe ReporC16-000028.docx • • City 0/ Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Environmental Review Committee Report APRON A 737 Cl MAX LUA16-000028 Report of March 14, 2016 Page 3 of 8 C. 2. The proposed landscaped areas identified in Exhibit 6, shall be installed and inspected by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to the addition of impervious surface in Apron A. 3. The applicant provide the City and the Muckleshoot Tribe a follow up lighting study, following the conclusion of the project, documenting that the new lights have not increased artificial lighting levels on the lower Cedar River. If the study identifies increased lighting levels changes would be required to the new and/or existing lights in Apron A to reduce the levels to be equal or less than current conditions. 4. If any Native American grave(s) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found all construction activity shall stop in accordance with RCW 27.53.060 and 27.44.020, and the owner/developer shall immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Exhibit 10 Exhibit 11 Exhibit 12 Exhibit 13 Exhibit 14 Exhibit 15 Exhibit 16 Exhibit 17 Exhibit 18 Environmental Review Committee Report Neighborhood Detail Map -Sheet C4 Site Plan -Sheets C80 Utilities Plan Existing, Generalized -Sheets C293E Utilities Plan Proposed, Generalized -Sheets C293 Landscape Plan Conceptual -Sheets LS60 -LS63 Storm Drainage Plan -Sheets C295, and C296 Elevations -Sheet A60 Floor Plans -Sheet 1AlO Technical Information Report, Prepared by DOWL, dated January 2016, revised February 2016. Standard Stream Study Narrative and Habitat Data Report, Prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler, dated January 2016, revised March 2016. Impingement Study, Prepared by Casne Engineering, Inc., dated December 1, 2015 Geotechnical Report, Prepared by S&EE, dated January 5, 2016 Apron A Truck Route Agency Comments, WDFW and Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Fisheries Division Boeing response to Comments, dated March 1, 2015 Construction adjacent to USACE Levee, dated December 4, 2015, prepared by DOWL Plan Review Comments D. Environmentallmpacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the opplicont has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the propasal is likely to have the following probable impacts: ERC ReporC16-000028.docx ---------------------------------------------------- • City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development • Environmental Review Committee Report APRON A 737 C1 MAX WA16-000028 Report of March 14, 2016 Page 4 of 8 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is located in an area of known seismic hazards a geotechnical hazard. As such the applicant submitted a Preliminary Geotechnical Report, prepared by S&EE, dated January 5, 2016. Based on the provided report during WWII the site area was level by up to 8 feet thick of fill. On September 17 and 18, 2015 S&EE completed a subsurface exploration which included 10 soil test borings and the installation of one groundwater monitoring well. Generally the boring results indicated that the subsurface conditions at the site include fill over native soils. Fill raged from about 3 to 8 feet in thickness and included sand, silty sand and silt. In general, these soils are at least medium dense to medium stiff in the upper 5 feet and appear to have been placed with some compaction. The native soils below the fill include sand, silty sand and silt. In general thee soils are very loose to loose or very soft to soft. On September 21, 2015 S&EE measured the groundwater depth at 6 feet 2 inches below the ground surface. S&EE believes that the depth of the groundwater is affected by the river level and precipitation based on his experience with the subsurface condition in the site vicinity. According to the City of Renton Critical Areas Maps the project site is located in a seismic hazard area. The provided Geotechnical Report addressed seismic hazards identifying that the site is under the threat of two types of earthquakes, crustal and subduction zone events. The Geotechnical Report indicates that the project area has high liquefaction susceptibility. As such, the report includes recommendations to consider buoyancy force in the design and compliance with the seismic design standards in accordance with the International Building Code (IBC). The report continues to provide recommendations, induding but not limited to, foundation support, temporary slope and shoring, subgrade preparation, dewatering, structural fill, and pavement design. The applicant should follow the recommendation included in the provided geotechnical report or an updated geotechnical report at the time of project construction. The applicant has indicated the project would result in 3,900 cubic yards of grading, 2,300 cubic yards for concrete, 1,600 cubic yards for base, and 3,900 cubic yards of excavation for pavement reconstruction. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,020 SF. The applicant has proposed to balance the increase in impervious surface coverage at the site by removing impervious area elsewhere within 200 feet of Reach A of the Cedar River with a net result of no gain in impervious area within 200 feet of the river Reach. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation required Nexus:N/A 2. Water a. Wetland, Streams, Lakes Impacts: The site is located along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A of the Cedar River Shoreline is designated as High Intensity at the project location. Due to the projects location within 200 feet of the OHWM of the Cedar River the applicant prepared a Standard Stream Study Narrative and a Habitat Data Report, both Prepared by AMEC Foster Wheeler, dated January 2016, then revised March 2016. The provided report primary address the effects of the new and relocated light stands on the Cedar River and the associated Fish Habitat. See additional information related to lighting effects of fish habitat below under 3. Wildlife. ERC ReporC16-000028.docx • City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development • Environmental Review Committee Report APRON A 737 C1 MAX LUA16-000028 Report of March 14, 2016 Page 5 of 8 No components of the subject project would occur below the OHWM of the Cedar River. All work would be located west of E Perimeter Rd. which is located between the OHWM and the project site. According to the stream study the project site provides limited ecological function due to low habitat diversity and complexity. The Stream Study concludes that because no project components will occur below or immediately adjacent to the OHWM of the Cedar River it is highly unlikely that project components would affect biota or alter habitat in the river. Furthermore, the study states that the project will result in no net loss of ecological function in the riparian zone of the lower Cedar River. The proposed project would add 8,020 sf of new impervious surface within the 200 foot shoreline area in Apron A. The applicant has proposed to mitigate for the added impervious area in Apron A by removal and re-vegetation from nine locations along the lower Cedar River within the 200 foot shoreline area. The revised stream study concludes that the replacement area would mitigate for the added impervious area. In addition, the added impervious coverage would not result in an effect on existing habitat or ecological conditions within the 200-foot shoreline zone or within the adjacent lower Cedar River. Based on the provided landscape plans (Exhibit 6) the nine new landscaped areas would result in 9,984 square feet of new landscaped, exceeding the square footage identified in the stream study. Based on the recommendation included in the stream study for both light reduction (see discussion below under 3. Wildlife) and impervious surface mitigation staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the applicant comply with the reconditions included in the stream study. In order for the new landscaped areas to offset the impacts for the added new impervious surface area the new landscaped areas should be installed prior to the addition of impervious areas at Apron A. By completing the landscape areas prior to the impervious addition there would be no net loss of pervious areas during or after construction. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the Standard Stream Study Narrative and Habitat Data Report, prepared by AMEC Foster Wheeler, dated March 2016. 2. The proposed landscaped areas identified in Exhibit 6, shall be installed and inspected by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to the addition of impervious surface in Apron A. Nexus: SEPA, 4-3-090 Shoreline Master Program Regulations b. Storm Water Impacts: The applicant submitted a Technical Information Report (TIR) prepared by DOWL, dated January 2016, and revised the study on February 2016. Based on the updated TIR, the project contains greater than 2,000 SF of replaced impervious surface and therefore Full Drainage Review would be required pursuant to the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City of Renton Amendments. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard, Existing Site Conditions. A Full Drainage Review was included in the report and shows the site receiving Basic Water Quality however, per the 2009 COR Amendments to the KCSWDM on page 1-63, Enhanced Water Quality is required as well as an onsite flow control BMPs. ERe ReporC16-000028.docx r-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~------ • • City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Environmental Review Committee Report APRON A 737 C1 MAX WA16-00002B Report of March 14,2016 Page 6 of 8 The applicant has proposed separate storm drain systems for stalls A-9 and A-10_ Both stall are proposed to incorporate a collection system using slot drains and catch basins, with treatment train consisting of oil-water separators and StomFilters, and then discharge through the existing storm drain into the Cedar River_ Both stalls would have fuel spill and hydraulic fluid spill diversion and containment facilities. In the case of de-icing, an automated valve would rout the de-icing liquid into a sanitary API separator. The Deicing runoff would be routed to the sanitary sewer system for treatment. Both stalls would incorporate a stormwater pump station that would lift the entire runoff form the stalls, both treated and bypass flows, into a structure at the east edge of Apron A. The receiving structure would send the flow downstream through the existing storm system. An adjustment to the 2009 KCSWDM is required for the pumps and has been requested as a part of the revised TIR. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this site and the final drainage plan and drainage report must be submitted with the utility construction permit application. Apron A is located immediately west of a constructed US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) levee along the west bank of the Cedar River. The applicant provided an analysis of the projects construction and impacts to the constructed flood protection structures, flood wall and levee (Exhibit 17). Based on the provided analysis by DOWL the proposed project would not be located within the existing USACE levee. Utility trenching and construction of the blast fence foundations would be within 15 feet of the USACE levee. The work was reviewed by Boeing geotechnical engineer, c.J. Shin of Soil and Envir~mmenta I Engineers. The applicants Engineer's opinion is that the project "will not impose adverse impacts on the seepage pattern and structural integrity of the existing levee". Based on these conclusions impacts to the existing flood protection is not anticipated as a result of their subject project. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation required Nexus: N/A 3. Wildlife Impacts: The project is located in an area of threatened species under the Endangered Species Act, the Puget Sound Chinook salmon and Puget Sound steelhead trout. In addition to the two threatened species WDFW Wildlife's Priority Habitat and Species databased identified five salmonid species that use the lower Cedar River, Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Sockeye salmon, Steelhead, rainbow trout, and Coastal cutthroat trout. The provided Stream Study, Exhibit 11, included a Habitat Data Report and analysis. The entire project area is highly developed and disturbed. AMEC Foster Wheeler completed a qualitative assessment of the Cedar River Adjacent to the project site and found that the area provides very low habitat value and function due to the sparse riparian vegetation and habitat complexity. The study continues to state that the project will not involve any in-water components or work below the OHWM, nor would any portion of the project occur in the riparian zone. The only portion of the project that could potentially affect aquatic biota is light impingement from the additional lighting proposed for the Apron project. Due to the potential of lighting impacts the provided study focuses in the proposed new light poles at the site and evaluates light intensities before and after the proposed project. Furthermore, the applicant provided a Lighting Impingement Study, prepared by Casne Engineering, Inc, dated December 1, 2015. The December 1st Impingement Study concludes that the added light stands would have a trivial increase of light along the shoreline. Due to the trivial increase it is concluded ERe ReporC16-000028.docx • City of Renton Department 0/ Community & Economic Development • Environmental Review Committee Report APRON A 737 C1 MAX WA16-00002B Report of March 14, 2016 Page 7 of 8 by the Habitat Data Report that the project would not have a negative impact on the wildlife in the lower Cedar River. The City received two agency comments related to the added lighting and its effects on habitat in the lower Cedar River, the first from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), dated January 26,2016, and a second letter from Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division dated February 12, 2016. WDFW states in their letter "based upon the information contained in the lighting impingement study conducted for this project...and the project is designed in a manner to mitigate the potential impacts of the lighting associated with the project on fish and wildlife resources at the site". The Muckleshoot's comment letter expressed concerns related to the impingement study and the fact the project would result in an increase in artificial light intensity along the Cedar River shoreline. Furthermore the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe disagreed with the outcome of the AMEC study. Following the receipt of the Muckleshoot Comments, the applicant revised their lighting plan and provided a response letter to the tribe, Exhibit 16. In the response letter the applicant indicated that modification were made to the lighting plan and design, reducing the number of fixtures located east of the 05-440 Super Cabana building. These changes were proposed to help minimize artificial light intensity on the Cedar River. The letter indicates that the light impingement model was rerun incorporating the changes to the lighting plan. The result of the changed lighting plant represents an overall reduction of 33% in light intensity from the original design as well as a decrease of 0.1 fc from the maximum light intensity modeled under existing conditions. Furthermore the applicants indicated that to ensure that the model calculations area accurate, follow up light samples would be collected at the conclusion of the project_ To ensure that the proposed new lighting plan and design do not increase artificial lighting on the lower cedar river, staff recommends a mitigation measure that the applicant provide the City and the Muckleshoot Tribe a follow up lighting study documenting that the new lights have not increased artificial lighting levels on the lower Cedar River. If the study identifies increased lighting levels changes would be required to the new and/or existing lights in Apron A to reduce the levels to be equal or less than current conditions. Mitigation Measures: The applicant provide the City and the Muckleshoot Tribe a follow up lighting study, following the conclusion of the project, documenting that the new lights have not increased artificial lighting levels on the lower Cedar River. If the study identifies increased lighting levels changes would be required to the new and/or existing lights in Apron A to reduce the levels to be equal or less than current conditions. Nexus: SEPA, RMC 4-3-050 Critical Areas Regulations, 4-3-090 Shoreline Master Program Regulations 4_ Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: In the SEPA checklist the applicant indicated that they completed a search of the Washington State Information System of Architectural and Archaeological Records Data. The Checklist concludes that the system did not identify any properties within the project area as being on the historic property inventory or register. No comments were received from the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. The northern portion of the airport was once under the surface of Lake Washington. In addition the Black River used to run out of the lake, flow south through the airport and then west. Based on ERC ReporC16-000028.docx City of Renton Deportment of Community & ElomiC Development APRON A 737 C1 MAX Report of March 14, 2016 'Vironmentol Review Committee Report LUA16·000028 Page 8 of 8 the probability of the subject site being along the banks of an old river channel and lake shore there is a higher likelihood of cultural resources discover, through ground disturbing activity. As such, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that if any Native American gravels) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found all construction activity shall stop in accordance with RCW 27.53.060 and 27.44.020, and the owner/developer shall immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. The SEPA check list indicates that if any archaeological resources are encountered a professional Archaeologist would be called to assess the significance of the find. Mitigation Measures: If any Native American gravels) or archaeological/cultural resources (Indian artifacts) are found all construction activity shall stop in accordance with RCW 27.53.060 and 27.44.020, and the owner/developer shall immediately notify the City of Renton planning department, concerned Tribes' cultural committees, and the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Review, RCW 27.53 Archaeological Sites and Resources, and RCW 27.44 Indian Graves and Records. E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ./ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. The Environmental Determination decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing together with the required fee to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 1, 2016. RMC 4-8-110 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall-7'h Floor, (425) 430-6510. ERe Report_16·00002B.docx - ~ I \ \ U ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I ---::1\--\\--~\[~~~~~;:/_ \0 I I I I I I \ I \ 10-45 tn \ I 4-20 -f;!\ \ , rll. Kl k -, UII \ t(bl\ll ~(~,£', 2016 (N) N. 10TH STREET I:=::::::::-~ , ' I • I", _ I ,'-, . i---THE LANDING ! zoo 100 n 100 200 'OIl iIij! • ,~ LEGEND SDIF ----~l.INE ----~PII!Jf'El1Nl.N: 5-44- I .__ ~ ii========-'::--"--'-"'°/1 m::. __ " ,I - ~ I IIl1f' . j, 1 1 PROJECT Ii r ~r SITE "-co ~I I N. 6TH ST. N. 6TH STREET ~ r l\i~::==a3g=--,---_~ . z z Z 10-16 f o , , , , '" ~ ~o < ; ; ;; ~~ ~ -' [j ~ n..0 :$ ~ r::l... n.. 1 •• ~ ,",,, ~ ~~ ~ CO Z o -.L:--PfT F--:::--, " " " , I 410 EX~B~ \\ ~= ~CWI ~~I 0<. , I c-~ ~ '" IV"' '(?'-BIIE'N.°ti ,.1 __ 1_\ If MARCH'or~~~~ C4 OOElNG 737 IIAX fl.lGlffiJNE UlUllES-.Ii'iION ~ 0 PR(IJU:1 ~ I ~_ I SITE05-YD EXHIBIT 2 eMl w.sr[R .~. • • Il .. U1.l5 II ,f --= --~. ~-- ~------:~-~<"-~- ' --""..,--\ 1'1 _~.' l" " -== , 'd. i _'"'-"------1'<-< _,. '0,;1 __ " \ ~.>! UNE "". "'ft-, ~""",.... ~~19 LEASE_~ \ g,; PROPERTY "'c~ -1\ ~ -",,"," ® , , -, '. j ':.l ~ II I .... '" A-~ ,": .... " .. ". • ! " , --" LEGEND , ..... 'I 'l ~ ------. j -----, , --, ,_ ..... "" ,,,,,,,AYB -~ .. -\ III ~ I _._-_. -. , .-i -_. / , -b r -, ll'PE 2 CATCH GRATE / ~ ""'W l -;1 ; . -'-."::: .. -~ ·~~---I· ~, " --•• k', ,~ \ l'l ~ ~""""" , --'I ~ i;..;:.I. I;,> L\ A """ ""'" "" , 111", n\~ : ~ -~ ---, ,-,,, '" : -4ff'SAHlT.I.RY \<~. 0 , -. ---'--. . ,. ,, >!> """,~m~ '[l ~8 ~ ~ ~ 0 '''''-" ., ; """"'" ~ \: 17 , ,-""""" ',: /~:1f -"'""""-,,[ -, BOEI«l 'AlER --. --= '1 , -.--"'" --ID'Il .~lER \ \' -, ~ """ """"" , -'"C-PRCPERIY lUSE lIE --= foR'OO P!U'£RlY ~ , ........ __ ,m' ... -__ """'" """" ------:, rna C~ ," ~ i " i O "' .... "'=~~~-e ~. APRON A f{ ¥ , :~ SSM:-! AB"" TOP 1 ~.89 INY N 1S.}» WL 17.J9 80T 13.89 I \\\ " COMPASS ~ CAUBRATlON PAD , ~ _;,. _, _--~--.-0J ,_.--"':" ,.~' j""\ II ,~.,--~' .,-~pC--<~_~_;c~:;{' ~ ':_/A~--'-'~:~~::~~ ,~~~~.'.'_.~ ~"c:"--~ ___ l,:; ~' .",_~v":~ \.-.... -_...-oTi-~ ..... :,:;..-"-~ ....---:::::;:;-"'-"1'== ~~. ;~/cC-~~'·' ....... ~"""R"'" ~~r '"'o_~ _,_,' ,', ,::..--?'if---->,~","' (,p(R! -~'~. _,_, ~±-:'~~<:::'_""--c"'=~~ /-;~ ~~ "-,-~---!;-::--=~J -- \ ' i\ i. .::::::-' '\, g \' ~!C: \ "~~ ~~i' , " "', ,"' , :' I' < 1 '\ I I L.:"-." Ii ,,11 l~;' c~-~ --~~.-. ~,t \ 5C-02 \ 1~'--'C""'" --~,-"'!".1t~f ,<~" . ~ :~ , ~ "'~,. --,.-'-" .~;;: ;~-' -, --.--.?"-~:':-"' F'~' ' , <lATE ~-",--, RIM 213 \ HIJ~," <><>~- fif'\ " """ ,--'-, ,::">"" ""n~,~ <$, -;~'" "" , .fJ'!"'.! "'r:., ,,';, :--":::"~)\/' '.. • ..-dI ,I!'" ' -l;/I '-l'r=-' ~ ~_' -.~~' i5S:,~ ';.,;~, '@"'i" ~=_,#__ _ _~~ -_-< \;!"~ \~D _ IJ:~£YPAD DATUM NOT[~0, -;;~" _~ .. -.:t"\' -" " ~ PIJH!I1'IIEI'I'ftII1.ISI«l!CMI29IST1£ -~_ -.._ SCIJlHIROilE~~ -n" " ... t\l-- 'o'ElITK:II. l».TLU. TO CCfMRf 1tI NIoIID 118~'""""""""·-~ \\ ~ --:;;.---~.....,-~~""~""'i""iroi~!-!.,..,.,.,~~~~r .. --c::----...... -\\ ~.'.;-cc ~:;-~ ~ OUI<:R ..... _'" ~~ 'Jl .... 1I.OIIl.Ol1/IU5-<U'I ==E=l~ EXHIBIT 4 --------$ ---- ~----- -, ~:;:;-,~,--1&'-'· ~~\" ,._ "]I(..,y"'" 7~ _____ ~ iif#r; ,~ '< __ i KEY PlAN SHORELINE PERMIT "'"' .fs :::::: MARCH 01,2016 ~CWL "":.;:tt"lStr-c G 7J7 IW f1£HT1.IIE IJIIUTlE5-/.PIIOH. a PRO.I£tT I' C293E I I r=:: I I .... ,_ SITE OHD :: ,= I i I I N ,-,---,--' -- • \ ~ \ ~ N • m o • N • I l/ ,. \ ;ill , I~/' .~" .. ". n~ r--- I I I I I I I I I \ c-----------------~. --------------------- , , _7W SS8 __ 'lfSf ssu---;-zt , = o rr~ '»=+,,~ ,-IH V'I I I I __ -,.--------.~"'-~.'-cw-+, ~ ~~ I-::J ~ M 7--\~. tz.. /--~" ~,_ •• C. --'" <.;:.'"'9:' • __ ,,_' , .' U ,-" ~ , -----------------------_.. " . .....' -,-,~~ . ___ -""" .... C.,-" c,-·~--.;-' ,--,' ".~-' '.' /," ,,----,,--------" .... , , ,'" -""'--~------.-. { . ~ PERI"E1ER R""!. ___ --------------.::.:::.:."-=:: ;z~;;::::::~:::;:; c<o>R ""'" ~ .. , ~~~ ~~~'p1, 2016 ~ ZOln 0 lQZO 40 iMi ~1:20 LEGEND = @ '" o o ~ G @ [j A /'IJI __ _ /u~ -.-- ,,",",1111111 I!!!Ii!i@ ff-- = """"~ .. ..... ",.,.....,..~ l'o'EJGIEEM llI!:I (ctAMIllIS) ........". ..... ~ ClIP ~DR~ 1'I'PE lL CATCH BASIN, GRATE 1'I'PE 2 CATOi B~. sa..ll UD 1'I'PE 2 Cl.1Qi BASIt GII.o.TE SK'IDRIl. CATCH B.ISN FRE H1't)R,llNT OlSitIQ CONTCUI UN£ """"""~"" """'"' ="" -""""""" IA*lT 08£tT flU: .tII£l (KI"A) lrH SI«lRD.H: SEI9IQ( ""~~ ... rna '" ,,,"n "'''''' ID' IRIMOOS /IlEA _ '1!XI ~~......" •. ~~"'. ~l(jP ~n~_ D-, ' "'" _ 0; I ~ .. ' .....,..-"" KEY PLAN ~ , ~ 1,2016 ~DWL I SHORELINE PERMIT """ ,,' MARCH 0 -oa;:lrn"'I\,D/llIO£~'1;I1'Il\EI • M 01.01.11 ~IIEINS· ~~~ 10:-","""", "'=:=e'=-_ ... !-.! ....... :' .-.u; lANDSCAPE PlAN, CONCEPTUAL W~3I5SIiI-oRI OJ.01.1S lnOu' = I!CI(N:; IJ7 _ Jl.I;Hl\K 1/ll.I1lES-_ A 0 PiiWEt1 0J.01." SITE OS.YD LS61 11/3.4.41886 I~-""""., ~~~ ~ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ c<J>'R RN'l' ~~~=--___ ~_ 7""~-"-~·-r-t"'---·------------~ ,.:iJi,;.=~~-.-~~---"'--\ \ I r;; _~.~?Jti .-, ,~----~d A-~'- -,~ .. --,.,""--"" ... -,... .. -"'- ~.UEING· ....... ;" f".\ ..... 1.- !' , , ~ ----" \ SHORELINE PERMIT MARC H 01. 2016 SITE OS-YO ~f~J1l, 2016 iz) 201001020 40 IMJ stAl.£:l:20 LEGEND = @ '" o o e (J @ il ~ .,1l.11-__ ..-'u_ -.-- 1IIIilllillilillim = ~~= GROI,Nl CIMR-<I!ElDI IllS """'"' "" -~ ~"" OF"" .... l'I'PE 'L CATCH BASIN. GR ... lE 1'I'PE 2 CATCH IIAStI, S(U) LID 1'I'PE 2 CATCH B...sIN, GR"TE SK'I'IlRCI. CATOi BASIN ARE HlIlRNIIT DIISTNG alNTCU! LJN[ """"'" """"" "" ....",.. "'" "" --_ .. lMM' (IlE;I" FREE NI.tA (Tlf"A) 100' SHDREI.K SEIIW:IC >Of ....... """" .,.~ ""~= m~ I£W M'ElMOIJS /!REA ~ 'ZO(/ ~ S£TIW:K. TOTAl. ......" .. ~.=. ~~'=,~:. ~------------------------- , , \ , , , \ ~;7~ ~~£,AT10N VIEW ,@ ~SI~~lLf'AT10N VIEW ,@ ,-, r----.. 1"'_f\.IHlII1" __ • ......... -I EXHIBIT 8 '" NORTH ELEVATION VIEW f4\ SCA!£:17··;r-o·-1~1ELA(;[I NO EXPOSED GALVANIZED MATERIALS ALLOWED ON SITE. SEE GENERAL NOTE #3 ~~N!IJTT F!§!flI nPQ!1 $ 1--.1 f_!" 1ft; flICi1!IIlil'I«'" ISSUE FOR PERMIT MARCH 01, 2016 EXTERIOR ElEVA T10NS GENERAL NOTES 1Il:GOUAlCOlll1!ACTOl!.IIGlIiBPECTh'E ~ SIW.l 'IUII'r tKM5DIS .v«I COIOnIN stm'N ~ IH( IlAAWH;S. 2 1Il:GNRAlCOll1UC1tlR/ICl~5ItIU.!E ~SIIl.E FOR OOOROlNllllN Of Clil. ARCflJU;ru1W... S11IUC1\IIAt. iIEDWCX /ICl UfttRI:N.. IfCI!l(. .1. THERE SfIOU II' t«) EXPOSED ~~IZED IIITDII'olS. roo,.....::s 011 lK IoI'PlD SlMAC( 1R£J.1WDII5 ON NIl EmJ!DR OR \.INDERCItOIMC 1M1IJI\IIlS OR SURFII;Ci. .IU. OO'/NIlED OR ZK N'I'l£ll 1M1IJI\IIlS O~ COA~ SIW.l II' ~T I'MIlID 011 roo,.ltD 10 PRE'I[J(I EXPOSUlE Of 1\i£ GAlI'ANIZW/2J1; II\~ PRIOR 10 INSr.ll.1ATION OIICOI!I'lf1I)IIOfCClllSllllJC'OO • CONSTRUCTION NOTES [I>1t.t-* _ /ICl STAll S1'SfDI I1T 1IODUtJ.f!1I\IM'. [t>~IVJIlI;l.ll1[JlS.v«I ~~ [t>EXlOiI)R lQ!I. sa ~ B>SJmSl(llS1ll!.lCTlH.s[[~ [t> I'RfnIiSHED PEWrtR ClID' 1111 METAl. ];l;)Of PN£l. (lIRP-l~ [i>f'REJIIISI-C)PEWIIJIGRE'I' 1111 1lEJAl. SOU PNC. (WP-I} [!>1If1[wm.~ I.t> IIAU. !UI:: 1oECHAHDI. lMT. I'OIm 10 .. lOt _. SEE IIlDWICAL • ~DLRGroup_ _._- .. :1441886 RI 1ll.D1.16 f/i-IIDE'N." ~;..I _"",5:'" III 1M); F\..CK1l.WE ~.II'RON. EIUII..DNJS A60 A4 COL _/I-l ~ BUILDING 05-439 ,----... WJ«lM15 mIlOK. .... r""----~._ ~Ut~_l~EVATION 1@ NORTH ELEVATION Q;;l sou: 1/4 _I -(1) lAl0 AW ... ,n.' ........ -_ • .....,. -.-j'WIUI rtJ.-BIIEINDO GENERAL NOTES 1~~CC!IrR.ICTCWI,\jjORE3!'EClN!: ~ SHIil YEltf'I!IIIEII5IlH5 NrJ CONDItI)N_ONTIl:~ 2. THE COfER.tt COHtlI.IClUI 1M) SU9CONTItO.ClOR SIW.t !IE F!E5!'QNSO..E FOIl CI:lO!Di/ITDI OF Clo'l., ~ SIlII.ICMW. WWWICIoI. AN) ~WORK. l. TI£R[ SHIll !IE III EXPOSED ~VNIl£O IMIUIIALS. ~ 011 ZN: APPWl 5UIf/ICE lTIE/.TIEHIS Ofj _ EXIElmII CIIII.IMXlII::!I:OU IoIlItRW5 OR SUlFIoC[5. I.tJ. CAL'INmD 011 I .ofPI.aI w,ID!IAlS OR OOIYIIGS SHAll BE F'flIWKNTlT FlIIfIED 011 roo.1ID TO PRE'¥OII EX!'CI5Ift:a'r..:~/lJI;1I\1OIIAIS PRIll! IQ ttiUUATDI OR COOFI.EOON or - CONSTRUCTION NOTES: PIISi1 W!roII FOIl SPtJ. CQ;TIIIfER PU5H IlUfIOI rtI! IJ:-CN: IllOE F\J£L COIIf.llNlOllIJ:-«;1NG :;flOC. I'I8IlllIIttInlIIo:MllIOIl/lOClll SClSSai L.FT QiAR(;N; srAT(IN IT> .M«:lIlH 9Ol: RIll Wll[ll HfATER Io11-J IT> JI.ICOON!I:IlI FtIR IUItRK a!f:;.00!! $ ,HI 'J"!!lII'II!!!!!'T'!/ Jil.Ll-!!dkl' lJ, F!N!5IfJ!ROO!! $IT> JI,H;lI)NI30HOIIPOW£R El_IIXI'-I!" ~S04~1~EVATION ,@ IT> Ol/WIIIDI 5£F'AIU,ltII [1[> !J5CONHECT swm:H fl)II HfAT ....... m:>01000.~ IlL> ~'lDI $!»II. SEI tu .... 4!OU !:IT> T1IANSruRllER ON 2' 8" $TRU:IIJRE. SEE Il> It> Il> I!> Il> Il> C[fAL 4/E313 ~II[IAtRCI;F{lI!P-I). ~ !oVAl \IIlIil PNn (IIW_I) .. = l.QIIlI£FlmlRE,TYP. IHH*HHHHgl~I~: ::: ....,,-- '.II..l~IIIEctw.lCAl.IJI(f.~ TO AElJ) 'omfY .ICI\I\L HEICtIT so TlIIIT $lIPPl.l!X.CT15ClmOFIWl£l!S.PNNrro 1I\Tt:H_.'lU~ PREfIISOO) Ij(fAt SIRIJI IICUHlID CVITER F'RUIN5Ifll IVN. IXIWI$'OUT CONI£JID TO -~ 1IET.ot sr:mT (\151'-1),. flNISHEDF1R."" EAST ELEVATION SO<£: 1/4"."-1,1" lA~ NO EXPOSED GALVANIZED MATERIALS ALLOWED ON SITE. SEE GENERAL NOTE #3 ~~-~Oi-l ~.:... _ .. 1 ...... 1 .... ~ "iii~ ~ISI£l)FI.OOR ..... ~ Ii» ~ ~ [!> IIEt~UllTE£'tOIn EYE WASH. sa: ~ [lII.IIRC IMS1AllllDClClNGB£lII'EDISIU05mstWl'Ol!! FtR IWl/F/ClURER RECOMIIIE~TIlMS. SAmT SIIOfII(lI. sa IItOWil:Al IJWIHl l{115l11_ I(;lIIU. !I.L'CQC EV1IEEN s= TO ~m_ RECOMMEN\lI\!I;lNS. PIlEfNSIflIICAlIOX '0'00". IVN. IIOQr P»U __ 1 (MR f5$ WElllUl SiID. FlIoW[I) AWNIIG SCAil: 1/4·~i·-ci· r----SS-U-E-F-O-R-PE~R-M~IT---, MARCH 01, 2016 Iiil DIR Group _ _E_ ............. ~,-BUILDING 0&440 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS :-1-WJ.I.41eear -uRlll CJ.Dl.1! 7l1tW Fl.QIIlK -APROIIlUJ»GS A60 I AS --1!Of1ON.IIA'--ClS-440-~ z 'I I Ii I I -' II (0_. -------------~ Et i~ g i~ g ~ I . 15? 5; z- " ~~ ~g J~ !~ • OOVVL '.: Technical Information Report Boeing Commercial Airlines 737 Max Flightline Utilities-Apron A Renton, Washington Land Use Permit Submittal: February, 2016 EXHIBIT 10 ENGINEERING • Full Document Available upon Request SURVEYING " 1 ; 1 J • -;-- • 4. am?4p foster wheeler STANDARD STREAM STUDY NARRATIVE AND HABITAT DATA REPORT 737 Max Flightline Utilities -Apron A CI Project Renton, Washington - Full Document Available upon Request Prepared for: The Boeing Company Renton, Washington I Jf{~( ---R&ning D~VI . ~@lfjJ 0 VISED . Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 3500 188th Street SW, Suite 601 Lynnwood, Washington 98037 (425) 921-4000 March 2016 Project No. L Y15160380 EXHIBIT 11 Date 10 i i J 'r" 'If i ' , " I I i l~ Ii! j'I !, II 11 ! i , I I· I ,~ EXHIBIT 12 • • RENTON, WA APRON A IMPINGEMENT STUDY PROJECT # W3441886 DECEMEBER 1, 2015 Prepared by Full Document Available upon Request 1& CASNE ENGINEERING, INC. Electrical and Technology Consultants E 10604 N.E. 38th Place, Suite 205, Kirkland, WA 98033 S&EE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED APRON "A" UPGRADE RENTON AIRPORT S&EE JOB NO. 1509 JANUARY 5, 2016 EXHIBIT 13 Full Document Available upon Request APRON A BOEING 737 MAX FLiGHTLINE -TRUCK ROUTE DESTINATION AND ROUTE WILL CHANGE BASED ON MATERIAL AND TRAFFIC PROPOSED TRUCKING HOURS -24 HOURS/DAY -7 DAYIWEEK "Tln .. 1 NOISE WILL ATTEMPT TO BE LIMITED TO 6:00AM-6:00PM MON-FRI GENERATE FROM THE FOLLOWING: EXHIBIT 14 State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Region 4 Office: 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard -Mill Creek. Washlnglon 98012 -(425) 775-1311 January 26, 2016 City of Renton Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager CEO -Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98057 Dear Ms. Dolbee: SUBJECT: Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non.significance. Mitigated, LUAI6·000028, ECF, SM, Boeing Apron A 737 CI MAX Project, Cedar River, Tributary to Lake Washington, WRIA 08.0299 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) has reviewed the above referenced document and submits the following comments at this time. Most of my comments will be concerning the proposed lights associated with the project. There is currently considerable attention being directed toward the effects of artificial lighting on ecosystems and fish, in particular. On January 14,2016, I attended a discussion with local experts lead by Elizabeth Perkins of Willamette University on this subject at the county office. One of the local experts is manufacturing lights and has the capability to customize light fixtures_ I heard him state that, by changing the color temperature of the light, it is possible to change what fish see. A lighting study and reduction plan has been prepared to contribute to the mitigation for predation impacts related to the proposed Lower Cedar River Maintenance Dredging Project. This includes a list of recommendations for mitigating the effects of artificial lights, summarized as follows: 1. Reducing "on" hours 2. Relocation 3. Re-aiming 4. Addition of baffles or other shielding devices 5. Changing fixture types 6. Changing lamp types, color temperatures/wavelength and/or wattage 7. Dimming 8. Lower light levels if using LEOs; a caution about LEOs-the experts say they normally have a spike in the blue spectrum which is particularly harsh to many life forms EXHIBIT 15 ----_ .. _----------- Ms. Dolbee January 26, 2016 Page 2 9. Reducing lamp height 10. Eliminating unnecessary lights The effects of artificial lighting are important on the lower Cedar River, as documented in a study by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which found that outmigration of sockeye salmon fry is delayed there due to artificial light levels, making them more vulnerable to predation. I am' glad to see, based upon the information contained in the lighting impingement study conducted for this project, that the City and the Boeing Company have already given this issue serious consideration, and the project is designed in a manner to mitigate the potential impacts of the lighting associated with the project on fish and wildlife resources at the site. WDFW appreciates the opportunity to work collaboratively with the City of Renton in our efforts to preserve, protect, perpetuate, and manage the fish and wildlife resources of the state of Washington. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. If you have any questions, please contact me at 425-313-5683 or fisheldf@dfw.wa.gov. Sincerely, Larry Fisher Area Habitat Biologist LF:lf: CORBoeinILApron_A.SEP A.doc cc: WDFW: SEPA Coordinator ~.'''' • \:JJ;I MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE Fisheries Division 39015 -172 nd Avenue SE • Auburn, Washington 98092-9763 Phone: (253) 939-3311 • Fax: (253) 931-0752 Ms. Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager CED-Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, W A 98057 February 12,2016 RE: Boeing Apron A 737 Cl Max, LUA16-000028, ECF, SM, Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of N on-Significance-Mitigated Dear MkButDee: V (). 'N./lI:JtA : Our Habitat Program has reviewed the propose Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of . . Non-Significance-Mitigated for Boeing's Apron A 737 CI Max project referenced above. First, we would like to say thank you for sending thc.8ite plan; Stream Study; the Lighting Impingement Study; and the Technical Information Report that we needed to fully evaluate this project. Second, we apologize for the delay in getting these comments to Renton. Generally, we appreciate the City's efforts to require that the lighting impacts of this project be examined. We also appreciate the applicant's proposal to use full cut -off fixtures and careful aiming of lighting to try to limit impacts on ·the lower Cedar River. We recognize the project need and its importance to Boeing. However. the information provided in the modeling from the Casne Engineering Impingement Study December 1,2015) modeling and AMEC Stream Study (January 2016) both indicate that the project lighting elements will increase the artificial light intensity along the affected lower Cedar River areas by around 100 to 400 percent depending on the location. Existing light intensity in the lower Cedar River already exceeds the recommended goal from Tabor et al. (2004) of 0.1 lux by a factor of 10 or more in the project area. For reference, 0.1 foot candle (fc) is equal to 1.0764 lux (Ix). On that basis, we disagree with and do not understand how AMEC can possibly conclude that: "Even though the estimated light intensiliesfrom the modeling are higher than the measured light intensities, the model clearly demonstrates that there should be no significant change in light intensities on the LCR adjacent to the site under the proposed plan." • • March 1st 2015 Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Subject: Boeing Response to Muckleshoot letter regarding Apron A CI project Shoreline pennit # LUA16000028 To: Vanessa Dolbee Planning Supervisor This letter provides responses to comments submitted in a letter (dated February 12, 2016) to the City of Renton (the City) by Ms. Karen Walter, Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader, of the Muckleshoot Tribe (the Tribe). The Boeing Company (Boeing) wishes to thank the Muckleshoot Tribe for their comments and the City of Renton for the opportunity to respond to those comments. Boeing has a record as a strong environmental steward and is committed to incorporating conservation measures in all of its projects in order to minimize and avoid adverse environmental impacts. That is true of the current Apron A project under review. The comments from the Tribe can be categorized into the following three areas: • Concerns about the light impingement modeling results; • Concems about increased predation on juvenile salmonids in the lower Cedar River associated with light pollution. These concerns are based on extrapolations from the results and recommendations reported in the Tabor et al. (2004) study to conditions along the lower Cedar River adjacent to the Apron A project site; and • Mitigation measures to help reduce light pollution levels along the lower Cedar River to a management goal of 0.1 lux. Boeing will categorize its responses to the Tribe's comments, accordingly. Excerpts from the Tribe's comment letter will be provided in italics and Boeing's responses will be provided below each comment in normal font. Light Impingement Modeling. EXHIBIT 16 1 • • However. the information provided in the modeling from the Casne Engineering Impingement Study (December1, 2015) modeling and AMEC Stream Study (January 2016) both indicate that the project lighting elements will increase the artificial light intensity along the affected lower Cedar River areas by around I 00 to 400 percent depending on the location. Existing light intensity in the lower Cedar River already exceeds the recommended goal from Tabor et al. (2004) of o. 11 lux by a factor of 10 or more in the project area. For reference, 0.1 foot candle (fc) is equal to 1.0764 lux (Ix). On that basis, we disagree with and do not understand how AMEC can possibly conclude that: "Even though the estimated light intensities from the modeling are higher than the measured light intensities, the model clearly demonstrates that there should be no significant change in light intensities on the LCR adjacent to the site under the proposed plan. " The point that Boeing was trying to make when discussing the modeling results was that the model demonstrated that there would be no statistically significant change in light intensities along the west shore of the lower Cedar River after implementation of the proposed Apron A lighting plan when compared to existing lighting conditions. The mathematical model used does not measure or predict absolute light intensities but only measures differences in light intensities between existing conditions and those conditions that may occur after the new lighting plan at Apron A is built and activated. The model used by Boeing's electrical engineering contractor is calibrated in foot candles (fc), not in lux, and is not intended to predict absolute light intensities along the lower Cedar River under ail atmospheric conditions. The modeling of existing conditions demonstrated a range of light levels between 0.1 to 0.5 fc on the west bank of the lower Cedar River. Under the proposed lighting plan at Apron A described in the Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report, the model demonstrated a maximum light level of 0.6 fc along the west shoreline. A value of 0.1 fc greater than that modeled under existing conditions, which is not a statistically significant increase under the parameters used to run the model. A good lighting model can deviate anywhere from 5 tolO% from the actual install, with deviations on the higher side for low-level light samples, as is the case for this project. Factors such as weather, time of day, and angle of the sample being recorded (angle of incidence) can have an impact on the results, all within these tolerances. Since the Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report for the 737 Max Flightline Utilities -Apron A CI Project was submitted to the City, modifications have been made to the proposed lighting plan. The original lighting impingement study submitted to the City on December 1, 2015 used a proposed lighting model based off of the original design review layout. Since then, the lighting design has changed slightly, reducing the number of fixtures located east of the 05-440 (Super Cabana) building, helping further minimize artificial light intensity on the adjacent Cedar River. The light impingement model was rerun incorporating changes to the proposed Apron A lighting plan. The revised lighting calculations, based on the updated deSign, show a reduction from a maximum of 0.6 fc modeled under the original design, down to a maximum of .4 fc under the revised design. This represents an overall reduction of 33% in light intensity from the original design, as well as a decrease of 0.1 fc from the maximum light intensity modeled under existing conditions. It should be noted that these results are not in addition to the existing light, rather they are the calculated sum total of light in the area once the project has been completed. To insure that these model calculations are accurate, follow up light samples will be collected at the conclusion of the project. 2 ,--------------------------------------- • • The Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report will be revised to incorporate all project design changes and the new light modeling results. The revised report will be re-submitted to the City for review. With its additional lights along the Cedar River as shown in the lighting study, will add another 0.6 fc of light intensity to an area that already exceeds the recommended goal from Tabor et al. (2004) to reduce sockeye salmon predation. The proposed addition of 0.6 fc from the project significantly exceeds the 0.0091x recommendations. This comment is incorrect. The results of original the light impingement modeling did not demonstrate an additional 0.6 fc increase in light intensity from the proposed lighting plan, but did demonstrate, as discussed above, that under the proposed lighting plan, the modeled range of light intensities along the west shoreline of the lower Cedar River adjacent to the Apron A project site was between 0.1 and 0.6 fc, 0.1 fc above the modeled existing maximum of 0.5 fc. Again, discussed above, this does not represent a statistically significant increase above existing conditions. Under the revised lighting plan, the maximum modeled light intensity along the west shoreline of the lower Cedar River will be 0.4 fc, a decrease of 0.1 fc from the modeled maximum of 0.5 fc under existing conditions. Light Pollution along the Lower Cedar River as a Cause of Increased Salmonid Predation Existing light intenSity in the lower Cedar River already exceeds the recommended goal from Tabor et al. (2004) of 0, I lux by a factor of 10 or more in the project area. The Tribe cites the Tabor et al. (2004) study as justification for decreasing light intensities in the lower Cedar River to reduce salmon predation. Although Tabor et al. (2004), under their experimental field conditions, did demonstrate that direct lighting affected the behaviors of out- migrant juvenile sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) and resulted in increased predation by cottids (Cottus spp.), their study did not demonstrate increased Salmonid predation throughout the lower Cedar River, particularly in the lower Cedar River adjacent to the Apron A site. There are no sources of direct lighting in the lower Cedar River adjacent to Apron A and Boeing is aware of no studies that have been conducted in the lower Cedar River north of the Boeing South Bridge that have examined increased Salmonid predation attributable to existing light conditions along this reach of the river. According to Tabor et al. (2004), direct lighting is intense lighting that occurs in a relatively small area every night and usually all night. In contrast, reflected light and moonlight are not very intense but they are spread over a much larger area and vary greatly with the weather and moon phase. Direct lighting probably has strong localized effects on sockeye salmon fry, whereas reflected lighting and moon light probably have weak effects over a large area. Which of these has more overall effect on sockeye salmon fry is difficult to assess. However, it is much easier to reduce direct lighting than to address reducing reflected light. Direct lighting can be turned off, redirected, or shielded. Reducing reflected light would be a much larger and far more difficult management objective. Tabor et al. (2004) also indicated that reducing light level intensity can be beneficial for emigrating sockeye salmon and suggested keeping light intensity below 0.1 Ix (0.009 fc) would be a prudent management goal. 3 • • Tabor et al. (2004) discussed factors, other than light intensity alone that may affect Salmonid predation: The substrate type across the channel width may also have an important effect on predation in a lighted area. Larger substrates will create a rougher river channel and may have more abundant low-velocity locations for sockeye salmon fry. However, these same sites will probably also have more large cottids. In riffles of the Cedar River, the abundance of cottids larger than 50 millimeters (mm) total length (TL) was greatest in areas with large substrates such as cobble (Tabor et al. 1998). At the 1-405 bridge site, the substrate consisted primarily of cobble and large gravel; there we were able to collect several cottids larger than 50 mm TL. At another lighted bridge site in the Cedar River, however, the substrate was mostly small gravel, and few cottids larger than 50 mm TL were collected; thus, the overall predation at that site was probably minimal (Tabor, unpublished data). The lower Cedar River adjacent to Apron A ranges between 4-and 6-feet deep, depending on the season and river discharge, and is a depositional zone with a substrate consisting of silty sand. Vertical bulkheads occur along both banks of the Cedar River adjacent to Apron A. These conditions are substantially different than those where Tabor et al. (2004) conducted their field studies in 1999. Tabor et al. (2004) described two of their study locations on the lower Cedar River as having "high light intensity." These were the Renton Public Library, which spans the lower Cedar River (Figure 1) and 1-405 Bridge (Figure 2). At the time of the field studies conducted by Tabor et al. (2004) in 1999, both structures were equipped with lighting that resulted in direct light impinging on the underlying Cedar River. The substrate of the Cedar River beneath the Renton Public Library is composed of cobble (Figure 1), whereas that of the river beneath the 1-405 Bridge is coarse gravel and cobble (Figure 2). 4 • • Figure 1. Renton Public Library. Note lighting fixtures (circled). as well as the cobble substrate of the underlying Cedar River 5 • • Figure 2. 1-405 Bridge. Note lights beneath bridge (circles) and the cobble-gravel substrate of the underlying Cedar River. Nothing comparable to the lighting or habitat conditions at the Renton Public Library or the 1-405 bridge exists in the lower Cedar River adjacent to Apron A. The nearest light fixture to the lower Cedar River in the Apron A project area is located 48 feet west of the west shoreline of the lower Cedar River that projects light to the west toward the Apron A project area and away from the lower Cedar River. Whether existing indirect light pollution along the lower Cedar River adjacent to the Apron A project site is affecting juvenile Salmonid behavior or resulting in increased predation by cottids or other fish predators is unknown. Light Pollution Mitigation Therefore, we strongly request that the City require that the project's lighting be further modified in order to reduce the proposed artificial lighting impacts on the lower Cedar River. Importantly, we note that unless done so, this project will undermine the success of the lighting reduction plan associated with the City's proposed lower Cedar River dredging mitigation. 6 ----------------- • • We believe that more can and must be done to meet both the project's needs for outdoor lighting and to reduce impacts on salmon survival. We list some possible approaches below, although lighting experts or firms with an interest in dark sky or wildlife-friendly lighting should be consulted. You might contact Will Reed at Evluma in Renton for suggestions, although his company specializes in outdoor programmable LED lights, I understand that he is knowledgeable about wildlife friendly outdoor lighting. Examples to reduce lighting impacts include: o Increase the shielding of fixtures to avoid stray light from reaching the shoreline and night sky. o Reducing the height of poles. o Installing a dimming capability. o Limiting "on hours" to the minimum needed. o Further reduce wattage or light output. While Boeing understands that the Tabor et al. (2004) study recommends a management goal of keeping light intensities below 0.1 lUX, a light intensity equal to that of a full moon, the goal of the lighting design for the Apron A 737 MAC CI project is to not increase the intensity of light impinging on the lower Cedar River. With the proposed revised lighting deSign for this project, we are tracking to exceed this goal with a net reduction of artificial light on the adjacent lower Cedar River Additional efforts to help reduce light impingement on lower the Cedar River include the use of directional, low-Kelvin temperature fixtures, which studies have demonstrated to not be visible to animals that may be affected by light pollution, and the installation of lighting controls allowing personnel to tum off general area lighting when not in use. As reported in the Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report, Fong (2015) conducted light impingement study, measuring light intensities along the lower Cedar River. As a result of that study, Fong (2015) provided very specifiC mitigation recommendations as measures to help reduce light pollution on the lower Cedar River adjacent to the Boeing Renton facility. These recommendations were presented graphically in her report and included the following general mitigation measures: o Reduce on hours for essential functions only; o Relocation of fixtures; oRe-aiming of fixtures; o Add shielding to existing fixtures; o Change fixture types to full cut-off equivalent; o Add dimming capability to fixtures; o Rotating fixtures away from Cedar River; and o Elimination of some fixtures. Boeing will implement all of the mitigation measures as recommended by Fong (2015). These mitigation measures will be implemented as a separate project that will occur in 2016 or 2017, As stated and demonstrated in the Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report, light pollution along the lower Cedar River is a regional issue, not just a local issue. Although Boeing will implement all practicable mitigation measures that to help reduce light pollution along the 7 --------------------------------- --------- • • lower Cedar River, it will do so in the context of not endangering worker safety or interfering with production goals. As an aside, and unrelated to the Tribe's comments, Larry Fisher of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), in a letter addressed to the City of Renton ( dated January 26, 2016), provided his comments regarding the measures taken by Boeing to insure that the proposed Apron A project will not increase light pollution in the lower Cedar River. In that letter, Mr. Fisher makes the following statement: I am glad to see, based upon the information contained in the lighting impingement study conducted for this project, that the City and the Boeing Company have already given this issue serious consideration, and the project is designed in a manner to mitigate the potential impacts of the lighting associated with the project on fish and wildlife resources at the site. While Boeing understands the Tribe's concerns about potential light impingement from the proposed Apron A project, the letter from WDFW demonstrates the agency's satisfaction with the measures already in place to insure that the project will not increase existing light pollution in the lower Cedar River. A copy of the WDFW letter is provided as an attachment to this letter. Again, thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Tribe's comments. Should you have additional questions or if you would like to discuss any of the above responses, please do not hesitate to contact us. Mark Clement Renton & King County Permit Specialist The Boeing Co. 206617-2944 Michael J. Sullivan Boeing Facilities Engineer MC 96-11 Desk: 425-965-2421 Cell: 206-617-5465 Fax: 425-965-26I9 8 • • References Fong, D. 2015. Cedar River Electric Light Study. Prepared for the City of Renton, Washington by Stantec, Lynnwood, Washington Tabor, R.A., Brown, G.S., and Luiting, V.T. 2004. The effect of light intensity on sockeye salmon fry migratory behavior and predation by cottids in the Cedar River, Washington. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, v. 24, p. 128-145. http://rentonwa.gov luploadedFilesl Living/CS/LIBRARY/Lower%20Cedar%20Light%20Tabor.pdf (accessed November 24,2015). 9 ~DDWL December 4, 2015 W.O. 13726 Joseph Farah City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, 51h floor Renton, W A, 98051-3232 Re: Boeing 737 MAX Flightline Utilities Apron A -Construction adjacent to USACE levee Dear Mr. Farah: Thank you for meeting with us at the Renton Municipal Airport to review the proposed Boeing project located on Apron A, within Boeing's lease area. On behalf of the Boeing Company, this letter includes our request to construct the proposed improvements adjacent to the existing US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) levee along the Cedar River. Our understanding is that the City of Renton and USACE will complete an engineering review of the proposed improvements, in lieu of completing a procedural review, as described in 33 USC 408 (Section 408). The proposed project includes the following elements, as shown in the attached Figure 1: Site Plan: I) Construction of new asphalt pavement and cement concrete pavement. 2) Installation of new utilities, including storm drainage, fire water, domestic water, sanitary sewer, compressed air, and electrical. Approximate locations are shown in Figure 'I. 3) Construction of new buildings, including a 24' X 50' Super Crew Shelter, 24' X 50' Super Cabana (for tool storage), 20' X 12' restroom, and 10' X 10' covered storage area for maintenance equipment. 4) Relocation of two existing blast fences. This will include construction of new concrete foundations. Proposed work will not be located within the existing USACE levee. Utility trenching and construction of blast fence foundations will be within 15 feet of the USACE levee. The proposed construction located closest to the levee is shown in Sections A-A, B-B, and C-C (Fignres 2 -4). The proposed work has been reviewed by Boeing's geotechnical engineer, C.J. Shin, of Soil and Environmental Engineers (SE&E). The results of the SE&E analysis is included as Attachment A. In general, Boeing's geotechnical engineer's opinion is that the project "will not impose adverse impacts on the seepage pattern and structural integrity of the existing levee." The proposed work has also been reviewed versus other previous projects in the nearby vicinity. The Boeing Apron A Duct Bank project, constructed in 2014, included the construction of utilities along the toe of the levee. Utilities included a concrete duct bank, approximately 3' wide by 3' deep, and related utility vaults. The duct bank was located along the toe of the levee; the approximate location of the duct bank is highlighted in Figure I. Relevant plans for the previous Apron A Duct Bank Project are included for reference as Attachment B. EXHIBIT 17 ;9-2670 • 800-865·9847 (fax) • 8420 1541h Avenue NE • Redmond, Washing10n 98052 • www,dowl.com a II Arizona _ Colorado _ Montana _ North Dakota _ Oregon _ Washington • Wyoming .---------------- Mr. Joseph Farah City of Renton December 4, 2015 Page 2 !'A (u The previous Apron A Duct Bank project was reviewed by City of Renton and USACE staff, and the improvements were found to be acceptable. A Section 408 review was not required. On behalf of the Boeing Company, we are requesting City of RentonlUSACE engineering review and approval of the proposed improvements, in lieu of completing a procedural review, as described in 33 USC 408 (Section 408) .. Please let us know you approve this request, or need any additional infonnation. Sincerely, DOWL Darren Murata, P.E. Project Manager Figuresl Attachments: • Figure I: Site Plan • Figure 2: Section A-A • Figure 3: Section B-B • Figure 4: Section C-C • Attachment A: SE&E letter (9/30/15)' • Attachment B: Apron A Duct Bank Plans 425-869-2670 • 800-865-9847 (fax) • 8420 154th Avenue NE • Redmond, Washington 98052 • www.dowl.com Alaska _ Arizona _ Colorado _ Montana _ North Dakota. Oregon _ Washington _ Wyoming \ \ \ \ N l ~ ~ 3 ~ "- "" ,I I I " I z· 0_ I I I " I ~~ • \, =~ <> ~ . ~ , I" "' " g "- e 3: '> 9- ~ u "' ~ o I '" N ~ ~ :: N ./ 50 50 45 45 - 40 LAST -., FENCE \ I- f-?, 15.0' I-~I ROAD 35 9.0' 8.8' 40 35 30 30 25 25 20 15 \ ~ \ \ L APPROX. TOE \ '---\ OF LEVrE T BLAST FENCE-] -" TOE OF SLJPE \ FOUNDATION 10 5 \ ~, \.... XISTING DUl..T I-EXISTING (ROUND ~ANK LOCATION 20 15 10 5 o 0 FIGURE 2: APRON A SECTION A-A SCALE: 1" = 20' HORZ. & 1"=10' VERT. d'----________________________________________________ ~ -_. ----_ .. _- 50 ,45 • .5 " ~ 40 w .. .0 :; 35 o "' ,- 530 N ~ o ~ 25 <1i w ~ 20 o w I ~ 15 o N rn ~ 5 ." .i: z i? 0 u i!i Sl "- in :'i ~ « c e 5: ~ ;> Sl u "' 3-a I w N " " Cl PROPOSE \ :c GRAD~ Ul x APRO~ A \ 'LU / ~ . L EXISTIN3 lJROUN / PROPOSED 96" J CATCH BASIN 24.7' ~" ~ '-,/ / ~/ L-AP ~ .~ ~ ROA~ 9.2' 8.~' I PROX. TOE ROADWAY EM~ANKMENT EXISTING DITCH / L EXISTING FLOOD "'ALL FIGURE 3: APRON A SECTION B-B SCALE: 1" = 20' HORZ. & 1"=10' VERT. 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 o ~ ::; a ~------------------------------------------------~ 50 • 45 s ffi <g 40 <I 35 I N 1 ~ 30 i'! -< o ~ 25 ;:; m '" 8 20 w I ,- 5 15 N i'! -< o b 10 ~ ~ m • ::: 5 .l: 5 G 0 i!i o " ~ >- 5 ~ -< e ~ :> ~ ~ u ~ ~ 5 I w N ,.. '" 50 r APPROX. TOE ...:.-BLAST --" OF ROADWAY ,-MBANK~ENT FENCE 1\ r-t"t\v Ju~tlJ GRA )E I ~ ROAP . ~ I 9.1'. S!2 ~ • 45 40 35 eXISTING / ~. El· GROUND ~. I 10.5' tI/.:I ..1/ -' --' ~ / I ~ 5.6' ~ -I-6.4' I--19.5' I ...LI- BLAST FENCE J L EXISTING 30 25 20 15 FOUNDATION vlL WATER Floon IIAII 10 FUEL SPILL SEPARATOR VAULT . I--CONTAINMENT 5 ITANK o FIGURE 4: APRON A SECTION C-C SCALE: 1" = 20' HORZ. & 1"=10' VERT. .: ~ ij ~------------------------------------------------~ -------------------------------------------------- ADVISORY NOTES TO AP.ANT LUA 16-000028 Application Date: January 13, 2016 Name: Apron A 737 Cl Max Site Address: 616 W Perimeter Rd Renton, WA 98057-5327 PLAN -Planning Review -Land Use Version 1 I ", _! ,',' ,_ .<_~_-<;j, {' \ _ -.ji<',' i' '>(_-~l,ii-H<, '_:',,'r;;--';!'I-;q;'.:::iLi~'.I((qjjfW ;i[',lie iE~j.riQ/,i;!ijjjJi;J!iirJiHf!)iilp1:!iil!;i0!JhhiW!ijir:'!!!iltih-:tf!;';9fl:'!i¥diitli:;,i1!i_-"#;]i"~i;;/J;'d4!F-JV_AI;,i~<,,_-'fl!i(-ij;;,ji;,w;ti:_ i,0; '_d,>;;;lJ );;" ;ld;;i§f;'I''ik,:oiil,' ·Engtneerlng·.Review!Comments';iiii,i,ii;i·ipi",,'·:ii1NJti';Jii!:i~]i!!!lii;flPiiifiiiiillit1~,;.J':o"ntact.:::YI.cl(l:G.rQYer, 1,1'i25;,430fl':?9,1;, l;vgrOver~.renlolJ.wa.gov! Recommendations; I have completed a review for the above referenced proposal located at parcel 0723059007. WATER 1. Water service is provided by the City of Renton. The plans show installation of a new fire hydrant, reset of an existin9 fire hydrant and water services to buildings 5 440 and 5 424. SANITARY SEWER 1. Sewer service is provided by the City of Renton. Sewer connections are proposed to the 2 new buildings (5 440 and 5 424) and a sewer lift station is proposed but it is unclear from the plans where the lift station is pumping to.... Needs to be clarified. The City will need to work with Boeing to secure a way to bill for sewer usage. SURFACE WATER 2. A drainage report complying with the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWDM, was submitted from DOWL dated January 2016. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard, Existing Site Conditions. A Full Drainage Review was included in the report and shows the site receiving Basic Water Quality however, per the 2009 COR Amendments to the KCSWDM on page 1 63, Enhanced Water Quality is required as well as an onsite flow control BMP. The report also states the project is exempt from flow control, the report must include the criteria from page 1 37 in the 2009 KCSWDM. The report shall include a table of pre developed, pervious and impervious areas as well as developed, pervious and impervious areas. Per Core Requirement #2, all projects shall submit an offsite analysis. The conveyance calculations shall include pipe capacity analysis for the connection into the existing 18 inch concrete gravity line. The project will need to submit an adjustment for approval by the Engineering and Development Manager for the two pump systems separately from the report. Apron C required ductile iron storm pipe and this requirement will apply to this project as well. Adding boots to the catch basinl pipe connections will be applicable to prevent infiltration of groundwater into the conveyance system. Pump station documents shall be included in the O&M Manual. The final drainage plan and drainage report must be submitted with the utility construction permit application. 3. Surface water system development fee (SDC) will be applicable. The current rate of SDC fee $0.594 per square foot of new impervious suriace area, but not less than $1,485.00. 4. A Construction Stormwater General Permit from Department of Ecology will be required if grading and clearing of the site exceeds one acre. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this site. TRANSPORTATION ISTREET 1. Not Applicable. 2. A note shall be added to the plan that follows the FAA Circular No. 150/5380 6C; and similar to the note added to the Apron C plans. 3. Paving and trench restoration will comply with the City's Trench Restoration and Overlay Requirements. General Comments 1. All construction or service utility permits for drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2. When utility plans are complete, please submit four (4) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application, an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. ":~i,'jl."i"." f<.I~; ,,'/iI' '''R'.'''''''.::'' !.ilii "'il{l,;C":;'.";': Ih.'r .jL,.,"~.!v:.'td;.", •. ')j!.!...!.'.;<'!'d,~;. -,iii:; 'IN';;!!;!!: ,:IN; iid;" ?iR '.;iJl;IIi.'jf;;~lih.i'IJi;,':il,·C": .. ·.')i) t~';h,:,;lt, .. j I~IV" ,:,,' :coo ':';', ; 'D';.' .,' "Ib' ,t' ,. ,:'1'.:'4':".'2"'(5" ';4:'~3-'0~ .. 7'3"1··4 :·'.I~,i' 'd:'·lb"O" ,"J.@' "',' .'Y I '.Y' " .• :~. " ;c."' ',:? '" anOing eVleW,. ommens.!iP"','.',IUi •. " ";Cdi.j.;,, 'ii"·,,i!'~;.,.:i!i , o.n ae :" anessa'. ·0 .ee.:' -. -"V 0 ee ren onwa.goVi Recommendations: Planning Comments: 1. RMC section 4 4 030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8;30 am to 3;30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 2. Commercial, multi family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7;00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9;00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8;00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 3. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding. or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1 st and March 31 st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 4. A National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required when more than one acre is being cleared. 5. This permit is shall comply with the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The permitted is responsible for adhering to the U.S. Fish _a~d Wildlife Service Nati~mal Bald Ea.91e Management Guidelines (2007) and lor your U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permit. Ran; March 10, 2016 EXHIBIT 18 Page 1 ofl . ,", - :-.... .' . .~~....,:.-.....~ __ ~_De:~~:~~r~aw •.. .-......... "".,. ",'1) j: : CitY 6ft ........ ' -......•• :· ... ~,&:?Ffl·~·Q: .~~~<.-........... , Community & Economic Development Department·,,· , ., .;CE, :Chip::Vincent; Adrriinistr<itor' , " -. , March 8, 2016, '.,- Mark ti~m~nt. The Boeing Company.' . POBox 3707 Mq liN-oil Seattle,WA' 98124, , . >,.' . .: . . , ; .. , ", , i.SUBJECT:· "Off Hold" Notice.: .. :' . ,', '." • ,-• > : ,:. d •• ~ ; .... ,. .' '. : " .' " . . : ~ "~ ."' 'l, , . . ," . , . Boeing Apron A 737Cl MAX; LUA16-00P028, ECF, SM tWA •. 7 .• . .• , " ., " ". Dear Mr. ciemerit ":. '" . ;:. . '-. ' . , , , -" < '." , Thank you for submitting theadditi6nal rnat~rials r~quest~d in the February 18; L0161etter : from the City, . Your project has been taken off hold and the. City wil,lcontinuereview ofthe,. Apron A'737 C1 Max project c: . " . . . ,", ,- • ; :' v • -'.':. : • • ',' 'The'SEPAhasbeen rescheduled for ERC;nMarch 14; 2016. If you have.any:questions, please'.·· contactme at (425)430~7314.>; " ' . ", .. ' :.'.. , . . ",' '. . . '. "". -. "-:" , Sincerely, , '~ .. ,' ,~" . . :, .. -., - Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager cc: City of Renton /Owner(s) Jennifer Flathman/Party of Record Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa,gov .; .' '/ '. ------------------------------------- • March 1 st 2015 Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 • Subject: Boeing Response to hold letter below Apron A CI project Shoreline permit To: Vanessa Dolbee Planning Supervisor • Please see updated complete drawing set, project narrative, and TIR and Steam study with the same sq footage of impervious surface 8,020 sqft. • Please see updated Stream study stating no net loss of ecological functions' • Please see attached letter to the Muckleshoot tribe Please contact undersigned for questions Mark Clement Renton & King County Permit Specialist The Boeing Co. 206617"2944 ~t?k-t '{5--BDE'.;vO l • • Dear Mr. Clement: The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on January 20, 2016. During our review, staff has determined that additional information is necessary in order to proceed further. The following information will need to be submitted before May 19, 2016 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application: • The square footage of impervious area added to the shoreline is not consistent throughout the submittal items. Please clarify the square footage of new impervious serface in the shoreline and updated any plans as necessary. • The provided Stream Study did not address the ecological impacts of filling up to 8,500 sf of vegitated area. The study shall include an anaysis of net loss of ecological functions and vaules. • Please address the comments recived from the Mucleshoot Inidan Tribe, see enclosed comment leter, dated Febuary 12, 2016. At this time, your project has been placed "on hold" pending receipt of the requested information. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager • • Dear Mr. Clement: The Planning Division of the City of Renton accepted the above master application for review on January 20, 2016. During our review, staff has determined that additional information is necessary in order to proceed further. The following information will need to be submitted before May 19, 2016 so that we may continue the review of the above subject application: • The square footage of impervious area added to the shoreline is not consistent throughout the submittal items. Please clarify the square footage of new impervious serface in the shoreline and updated any plans as necessary. • The provided Stream Study did not address the ecological impacts of filling up to 8,500 sf of vegitated area. The study shall include an anaysis of net loss of ecological functions and vaules. • Please address the comments recived from the Mucleshoot Inidan Tribe, see enclosed comment leter, dated Febuary 12, 2016. At this time, your project has been placed "on hold" pending receipt of tlie requested information. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager • March 1 st 2015 Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 • Subject: Boeing Response to hold letter below Apron A CI project Shoreline permit To: Vanessa Dolbee Planning Supervisor • Please see updated complete drawing set, project narrative, and TIR and Steam study with the same sq footage of impervious surface 8,020 sqft. • Please see updated Stream study stating no net loss of ecological functions • Please see attached letter to the Muckleshoot tribe Please contact undersigned for questions Mark Clement Renton & King County Permit Specialist The Boeing Co. 206617-2944 ~tJte-<t '{).....BDE'''''O Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: • Vanessa Dolbee Tuesday, March 08, 2016 2:05 PM 'Karen Walter' • Subject: Attachments: FW: Apron A CI project response to Muckleshhoot letter CORBoeing_Apron_ASEPA.DOC; Response_to_Comments Apron A 031016.pdf Karen, Please find attached the Boeing Companies response to your comment letter on the Apron A project, LUA16-000028. As noted on page 2 of the attached letter Boeing states the following "To insure that these model calculations are accurate, follow up light samples will be collected at the conclusion of the project." At this time, staff will be recommending to the Environmental Review Committee (ERe) that this becomes a mitigation measure, ensuring that lighting levels after construction match or exceed their projected reduced lighting levels. If you have any additional comments please let me know. I am intending to take this project to the ERC next Monday. Thank you, 'Vanessa 'iJo(6ee, Current Planning Manager Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division 10555 Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425)430-7314 From: Clement, Mark D [mailto:mark.d.clement@boeing.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 10:52 AM To: Vanessa Dolbee Cc: Sullivan, Michael J; Maxwell, Jacob T; Hibbard, Bradley D Subject: Apron A Cl project repsonse to Muckleshhoot letter Vanessa, Here is Boeing response letter to the Muckleshoot letter I will bring up 2 hard copies for you thanks Mark Clement Renton & King County Permit Specialist The Boeing Co_ 206 617-2944 ~et-ut cti-IIOEiI'ND 1 Vanessa Dolbee From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Vanessa, • • Clement, Mark D <mark.d.clement@boeing.com> Tuesday, March 01, 2016 1O:S2 AM Vanessa Dolbee Sullivan, Michael J; Maxwell, Jacob T; Hibbard, Bradley D Apron A CI project repsonse to Muckleshhoot letter CORBoeing_Apron_A.SEPA.DOC; Response_to_Comments Apron A 031016.pdf Follow up Flagged Here is Boeing response letter to the Muckleshoot letter I will bring up 2 hard copies for you thanks Mark Clement Renton & King County Permit Specialist The Boeing Co. 206617-2944 ?!taW ee.-.e ~.DE'ND 1 ---------------------------------------------------, • • March lst2015 Department of Community & Economic Development City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Subject: Boeing Response to Muckleshoot letter regarding Apron A CI project Shoreline permit # LUA16000028 To: Vanessa Dolbee Planning Supervisor This letter provides responses to comments submitted in a letter (dated February 12, 2016) to the City of Renton (the City) by Ms. Karen Walter, Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader, of the Muckleshoot Tribe (the Tribe). The Boeing Company (Boeing) wishes to thank the Muckleshoot Tribe for their comments and the City of Renton for the opportunity to respond to those comments. Boeing has a record as a strong environmental steward and is committed to incorporating conservation measures in all of its projects in order to minimize and avoid adverse environmental impacts. That is true of the current Apron A project under review. The comments from the Tribe can be categorized into the following three areas: • Concerns about the light impingement modeling results; • Concems about increased predation on juvenile salmonids in the lower Cedar River associated with light pollution. These concerns are based on extrapolations from the results and recommendations reported in the Tabor et al. (2004) study to conditions along the lower Cedar River adjacent to the Apron A project site; and • Mitigation measures to help reduce light pollution levels along the lower Cedar River to a management goal of 0.1 lux. Boeing will categorize its responses to the Tribe's comments, accordingly. Excerpts from the Tribe's comment letter will be provided in italics and Boeing's responses will be provided below each comment in normal font. Light Impingement Modeling. 1 ------------------------------------------- • • However. the information provided in the modeling from the Casne Engineering Impingement Study (December1, 2015) modeling and AMEC Stream Study (January 2016) both indicate that the project lighting elements will increase the arlificiallight intensity along the affected lower Cedar River areas by around I 00 to 400 percent depending on the location. EXisting light intensity in the lower Cedar River already exceeds the recommended goal from Tabor et al. (2004) of O. 11 lux by a factor of 10 or more in the project area. For reference, 0.1 foot candle (fc) is equal to 1.0764 lux (Ix). On that basis, we disagree with and do not understand how AMEC can possibly conclude that: "Even though the estimated light intensities from the modeling are higher than the measured light intensities, the model clearly demonstrates that there should be no significant change in light intensities on the LCR adjacent to the site under the proposed plan ... The point that Boeing was trying to make when discussing the modeling results was that the model demonstrated that there would be no statistically significant change in light intensities along the west shore of the lower Cedar River after implementation of the proposed Apron A lighting plan when compared to existing lighting conditions. The mathematical model used does not measure or predict absolute light intensities but only measures differences in light intensities between existing conditions and those conditions that may occur after the new lighting plan at Apron A is built and activated. The model used by Boeing's electrical engineering contractor is calibrated in foot candles (fc), not in lUX, and is not intended to predict absolute light intensities along the lower Cedar River under all atmospheric conditions. The modeling of existing conditions demonstrated a range of light levels between 0.1 to 0.5 fc on the west bank of the lower Cedar River. Under the proposed lighting plan at Apron A described in the Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report, the model demonstrated a maximum light level of 0.6 fc along the west shoreline. A value of 0.1 fc greater than that modeled under existing conditions, which is not a statistically significant increase under the parameters used to run the model. A good lighting model can deviate anywhere from 5 t010% from the actual install, with deviations on the higher side for low-level light samples, as is the case for this project. Factors such as weather, time of day, and angle of the sample being recorded (angle of incidence) can have an impact on the results, all within these tolerances. Since the Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report for the 737 Max Flightline Utilities -Apron A CI Project was submitted to the City, modifications have been made to the proposed lighting plan. The original lighting impingement study submitted to the City on December 1, 2015 used a proposed lighting model based off of the original design review layout. Since then, the lighting design has changed slightly, reducing the number of fixtures located east of the 05-440 (Super Cabana) building, helping further minimize artificial light intensity on the adjacent Cedar River. The light impingement model was rerun incorporating changes to the proposed Apron A lighting plan. The revised lighting calculations, based on the updated design, show a reduction from a maximum of 0.6 fc modeled under the original design, down to a maximum of .4 fc under the revised design. This represents an overall reduction of 33% in light intensity from the original design, as well as a decrease of 0.1 fc from the maximum light intensity modeled under existing conditions. It should be noted that these results are not in addition to the existing light, rather they are the calculated sum total of light in the area once the project has been completed. To insure that these model calculations are accurate, follow up light samples will be collected at the conclusion of the project. 2 • • The Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report will be revised to incorporate all project design changes and the new light modeling results. The revised report will be re-submitted to the City for review. With its additional lights along the Cedar River as shown in the lighting study, will add another 0.6 fc of light intensity to an area that already exceeds the recommended goal from Tabor et al. (2004) to reduce sockeye salmon predation. The proposed addition of 0.6 fc from the project significantly exceeds the 0.009 Ix recommendations. This comment is incorrect. The results of original the light impingement modeling did not demonstrate an additional 0.6 fc increase in light intensity from the proposed lighting plan, but did demonstrate, as discussed above, that under the proposed lighting plan, the modeled range of light intensities along the west shoreline of the lower Cedar River adjacent to the Apron A project site was between 0.1 and 0.6 fc, 0.1 fc above the modeled existing maximum of 0.5 fc. Again, discussed above, this does not represent a statistically significant increase above existing conditions. Under the revised lighting plan, the maximum modeled light intensity along the west shoreline of the lower Cedar River will be 0.4 fc, a decrease of 0.1 fc from the modeled maximum of 0.5 fc under existing conditions. Light Pollution along the Lower Cedar River as a Cause of Increased Salmonid Predation Existing light intensity in the lower Cedar River already exceeds the recommended goal from Tabor et al. (2004) of 0, I lux by a factor of 10 or more in the project area. The Tribe cites the Tabor et al. (2004) study as justification for decreasing light intensities in the lower Cedar River to reduce salmon predation. Although Tabor et al. (2004), under their experimental field conditions, did demonstrate that direct lighting affected the behaviors of out- migrant juvenile sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) and resulted in increased predation by cottids (Coitus spp.), their study did not demonstrate increased Salmonid predation throughout the lower Cedar River, particularly in the lower Cedar River adjacent to the Apron A site. There are no sources of direct lighting in the lower Cedar River adjacent to Apron A and Boeing is aware of no studies that have been conducted in the lower Cedar River north of the Boeing South Bridge that have examined increased Salmonid predation attributable to existing light conditions along this reach of the river. According to Tabor et al. (2004), direct lighting is intense lighting that occurs in a relatively small area every night and usually all night. In contrast, reflected light and moonlight are not very intense but they are spread over a much larger area and vary greatly with the weather and moon phase. Direct lighting probably has strong localized effects on sockeye salmon fry, whereas reflected lighting and moon light probably have weak effects over a large area. Which of these has more overall effect on sockeye salmon fry is difficult to assess. However, it is much easier to reduce direct lighting than to address reducing reflected light. Direct lighting can be turned off, redirected, or shielded. Reducing reflected light would be a much larger and far more difficult management objective. Tabor et al. (2004) also indicated that reducing light level intensity can be beneficial for emigrating sockeye salmon and suggested keeping light intensity below 0.1 Ix (0.009 fc) would be a prudent management goal. 3 • • Tabor et al. (2004) discussed factors, other than light intensity alone that may affect Salmonid predation: The substrate type across the channel width may also have an important effect on predation in a lighted area. Larger substrates will create a rougher river channel and may have more abundant low-velocity locations for sockeye salmon fry. However, these same sites will probably also have more large cottids. In riffles of the Cedar River, the abundance of cottids larger than 50 millimeters (mm) total length (TL) was greatest in areas with large substrates such as cobble (Tabor et al. 1998). At the 1-405 bridge site, the substrate consisted primarily of cobble and large gravel; there we were able to collect several cottids larger than 50 mm TL. At another lighted bridge site in the Cedar River, however, the substrate was mostly small gravel, and few cottids larger than 50 mm TL were collected; thus, the overall predation at that site was probably minimal (Tabor, unpublished data). The lower Cedar River adjacent to Apron A ranges between 4-and 6-feet deep, depending on the season and river discharge, and is a depositional zone with a substrate consisting of silty sand. Vertical bulkheads occur along both banks of the Cedar River adjacent to Apron A. These conditions are substantially different than those where Tabor et al. (2004) conducted their field studies in 1999. Tabor et al. (2004) described two of their study locations on the lower Cedar River as having "high light intensity." These were the Renton Public Library, which spans the lower Cedar River (Figure 1) and 1-405 Bridge (Figure 2). At the time of the field studies conducted by Tabor et al. (2004) in 1999, both structures were equipped with lighting that resulted in direct light impinging on the underlying Cedar River. The substrate of the Cedar River beneath the Renton Public Library is composed of cobble (Figure 1), whereas that of the river beneath the 1-405 Bridge is coarse gravel and cobble (Figure 2). 4 • • Figure 1. Renton Public Library. Note lighting fixtures (circled), as well as the cobble substrate of the underlying Cedar River 5 • • Figure 2. 1-405 Bridge. Note lights beneath bridge (circles) and the cobble-gravel substrate of the underlying Cedar River. Nothing comparable to the lighting or habitat conditions at the Renton Public Library or the 1-405 bridge exists in the lower Cedar River adjacent to Apron A. The nearest light fixture to the lower Cedar River in the Apron A project area is located 48 feet west of the west shoreline of the lower Cedar River that projects light to the west toward the Apron A project area and away from the lower Cedar River. Whether existing indirect light pollution along the lower Cedar River adjacent to the Apron A project site is affecting juvenile Salmonid behavior or resulting in increased predation by cottids or other fish predators is unknown. Light Pollution Mitigation Therefore, we strongly request that the City require that the project's lighting be further modified in order to reduce the proposed artificial lighting impacts on the lower Cedar River. Importantly, we note that unless done so, this project will undermine the success of the lighting reduction plan associated with the City's proposed lower Cedar River dredging mitigation. 6 • • We believe that more can and must be done to meet both the project's needs for outdoor lighting and to reduce impacts on salmon survival. We list some possible approaches below, although lighting experts or firms with an interest in dark sky or wildlife-friendly lighting should be consulted. You might contact Will Reed at Evluma in Renton for suggestions, although his company specializes in outdoor programmable LED lights, I understand that he is knowledgeable about wildlife friendly outdoor lighting. Examples to reduce lighting impacts include: o Increase the shielding of fixtures to avoid stray light from reaching the shoreline and night sky. o Reducing the height of poles. o Installing a dimming capability. o Limiting "on hours" to the minimum needed. o Further reduce wattage or light output. While Boeing understands that the Tabor et al. (2004) study recommends a management goal of keeping light intensities below 0.1 lux, a light intensity equal to that of a full moon, the goal of the lighting design for the Apron A 737 MAC CI project is to not Increase the intensity of light impinging on the lower Cedar River. With the proposed revised lighting design for this project, we are tracking to exceed this goal with a net reduction of artificial light on the adjacent lower Cedar River Additional efforts to help reduce light impingement on lower the Cedar River include the use of directional, low-Kelvin temperature fixtures, which studies have demonstrated to noi be visible to animals that may be affected by light pollution, and the installation of lighting controls allowing personnel to tum off general area lighting when not in use. As reported in the Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report, Fong (2015) conducted light impingement study, measuring light intensities along the lower Cedar River. As a result of that study, Fong (2015) provided very specific mitigation recommendations as measures to help reduce light pollution on the lower Cedar River adjacent to the Boeing Renton facility. These recommendations were presented graphically in her report and included the following general mitigation measures: o Reduce on hours for essential functions only; o Relocation of fixtures; oRe-aiming of fixtures; o Add shielding to existing fixtures; o Change fixture types to full cut-off equivalent; o Add dimming capability to fixtures; o Rotating fixtures away from Cedar River; and o Elimination of some fixtures. Boeing will implement all of the mitigation measures as recommended by Fong (2015). These mitigation measures will be implemented as a separate project that will occur in 2016 or 2017, As stated and demonstrated in the Standard Stream Narrative and Habitat Data Report, light pollution along the lower Cedar River is a regional issue, not just a local issue. Although Boeing will implement all practicable mitigation measures that to help reduce light pollution along the 7 • • lower Cedar River, it will do so in the context of not endangering worker safety or interfering with production goals. As an aside, and unrelated to the Tribe's comments, Larry Fisher of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), in a letter addressed to the City of Renton ( dated January 26, 2016), provided his comments regarding the measures taken by Boeing to insure that the proposed Apron A project will not increase light pollution in the lower Cedar River. In that letter, Mr. Fisher makes the following statement: I am glad to see, based upon the information contained in the lighting impingement study conducted for this project, that the City and the Boeing Company have already given this issue serious consideration, and the project is designed in a manner to mitigate the potential impacts of the lighting associated with the project on fish and wildlife resources at the site. While Boeing understands the Tribe's concerns about potential light impingement from the proposed Apron A project, the letter from WDFW demonstrates the agency's satisfaction with the measures already in place to insure that the project will not increase existing light pollution in the lower Cedar River. A copy of the WDFW letter is provided as an attachment to this letter. Again, thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Tribe's comments. Should you have additional questions or if you would like to discuss any of the above responses, please do not hesitate to contact us. Mark Clement Renton & King County Permit Specialist The Boeing Co. 206617-2944 Michael J. Sullivan Boeing Facilities Engineer MC 96-11 Desk: 425-965-2421 Cell: 206-617-5465 Fax:4Z5-96~-Z6~9 8 = • • References Fong, D. 2015. Cedar River Electric Light Study. Prepared for the City of Renton, Washington by Stantec, Lynnwood, Washington Tabor, R.A., Brown, G.S., and Luiting, V.T. 2004. The effect of light intensity on sockeye salmon fry migratory behavior and predation by cottids in the Cedar River, Washington. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, v. 24, p. 128-145. http://rentonwa.gov luploadedFilesl Living/CS/LIBRARY/Lower%20Cedar%20Light%20Tabor.pdf (accessed November 24,2015). 9 ------------------------------------ l Leslie Betlach Plan Number: LUA16-000028 • A\ '---, City of --=====...;:!4 R (~.' H'11 .. fr(O".I. T~) r,~, ~ ..... ,.,.,,~~~~ Plan Review Routing Slip ~ ~~-~-.~ ~~,-~ .~ Name: Apron A 737 Cl Max -~, d (() Site Address: 616 W PERIMETER RD ~" '%-<::> Description: The applicant is requesting SEPA Environmental Review and a Shoreline Substantial Dev'~'"ent Permit to provide two aircraft parking positions and associated infrastructure for Boeing 737 aircraft, Each stall would be able accommodate de-icing operations. The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport, 616 W Perimeter Rd. The site is 13,6S0 SF and is zoned Industrial Medium (1M). Site improvements would include pavement repair and replacement, infrastructure including, water, air, electrical, lighting and stormwater drainage improvements. One new 1,560 SF super cabana building and 20 ft. light stand are proposed and the relocation of two blast fences, 3 light stands, and one 360 SF crew shelter. Overall the project would increase imperious coverage by 8,200 SF and result in 3,990 cubic yards of grading. The site is located within a seismic hazard area and along the Cedar River, a Shoreline of the State. Reach A the Cedar River Shoreline is designated as High Intensity at the project location. Review Type: Community Services Review-Version 1 Date Assigned: Date Due: 01/20/2016 02/03/2016 Project Manager: Vanessa Dolbee Environmental Impact Earth Animals Air Environmental Health Water Energy/Natural Resources Plants Housing Land/Shoreline Use Aesthetics Where to enter your comments: Manage My Reviews Which types of comments should be entered: light/Glare Hi stari c/Cultura I Preservati on Recreation Ai rport Envi ron menta I Utilities 10,000 Feet Transportation 14,000 Feet Public Service Recommendation -Comments that impact the project including any of the Enivornmentallmpacts above. Correction -Corrections to the project that need to be made before the review can be completed and lor requesting submittal of additional documentation and/or resubmittal of existing documentation. What statuses should be used: Reviewed -I have reviewed the project and have no comments. Reviewed with Comments -I have reviewed the project and and I have comments entered in Recommendations. Correction/Resubmit -I have reviewed the project and the applicant needs to submit and/or resubmit documentation and I have added corrections in Corrections. I-lie -lip Sig~ture af irectar a~orized Representative Date I e- NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) ~M.o .... ~""_Iiod""'_OjIIod_lhoDop_oI","""""nity.f_k;D""oprMItI !(ED)-P1.MInIOIoftjonol,hoClt-jolR_. Tlo.~-"' __ IIIOOJIPIIalIon..wlIllo_ Puolk"9P''''oI· ,"n""fY lO.lot6 lAND U5E NUMIUI: I'fIOJECT fUME: PRImp DEKilJPTION: Tho .p~II<ont " ,"QUI",", SEPA Environm •• ",1 f\elllow """ • SI1gr.~n. s.. .. ,.nt>.ol ~ ... """ "'.,..............., .;=.f!. ... ,\q ~ ond ...ocl"'<1 '"fro.lnK! .... for loolna 711 ""1011, hell ,\.III wg,Jlc!1Iot ,blo "',,<Om.,......,. de-~"I opon"""', Tile P'''I''''' 10_" Il1o ""''''''M"nKJpol .... "'0". &16 'AI POf ...... ' Rd Tho ~t." ll,5S!1 Sf Ind i. '''''l'IIlnd ..... II.1 M.dlum IIMJ_ !ott. ,m~"" ..... n .. "",uld induoI. ___ ~ and .e¢K .......... Inl.-"'Nct"'. Indudl"" W"", _". ".ru><al, HIh~'" .1Id Wlrmwil"' dra""l.'ml"G" • ....., .. O ....... I.sIoil5f""'"'<Ol>IRI~.""lO"-liIht ...... ....,"'_ood ..... lhorelou\lon of two bl." '.0001 3 II/In, "'od~ ond onO 3&0 SF crow ,hen." 0W'lI1i tlHr pr.j.ct WQuld_~'''' lIflP'I'kI"' '._0J" by 8,lOD!>F _ ~H WI 1.990 WloI< Y ...... J ".d'n, Tn" ~to I. ioc>tod W,,,,," 0 "',m" h ... rd or.' Inc! ,Ionl th. tocl .. IIN.", ShcnII ... '" "'. Slot. ""odI'" II>e c-"' .. , _ ~ ~ ... po1O<! .. HIP 'ntel'''''' ., "'" "'''I"'' loullon. PltOJECTlQCATtOi'I; _ PfTlIlMlNATIOOI OF 'o'Of'HJGN'flt.UCE, Mr< ..... nO (ONS-M), .... th. t •• d A&«K"'I. '~ •. CI'V 01 ~.n'o" "'" d.IO,m,nO<! tho, ~,,"Ii'''', .n~ ..,po<\> .,. """k ..... '" ,,,,,,K lrom II ... __ """"',. "'.,0100., .. [>Orml" •• "nd., tho RCW 4121t.1I0. tho (ltV of ~.n'on .. "lin, tho C~I...,,1 ON~'M !I''''''' "' .... ~tJa til". DN~'" i. ikeiJ to b< _ com",on! po~od. "" I~. ~"')O<t ond tI>o p,opo •• d DN$·M II. 'n'o."'.d ""0. ,'n,l. ,omrM'" ponod. ThH.,.,.. b< .... """"""" penod ,.,..,...,.. I/H! .....an« '" tho Thrahold ~""'no""" 01 N...,o ~''"'~'''",.oM''' .. ''~ (ON~."'I lh" mO"/~. tho onlV 0PF"'''"""Y to ",mmo", "" \hi! """10""",.,"1 ""pilCl> ",!he p,,,,,,,"" ... )4 ....... 0_>11>",,011 .. III follow tn .... uo.,o of tn. ON:>-'" DAn OF "'PPl.KATION: Otho, h,mIu .. hI<~ ..o, be ,.quI,"", L.'oIlOnwlo ... _"<otI ...... y .- C()Ij:5I$T~CI' OVUYlEW, Ion'..,... ..... "'" Jon",,,, 10. 2016 M ..... 00 ....... Tho _III c"J PO aox I101 Mt lWqJ!50attlO, WA lRIIUIZIJ6.61J·nu [."lran ... _(5I:.A) R ...... , 51>0,.11 ... SulRt.,.uol D ..... oprno'" -"~. o.o'no,. ,opo'" G •• t.ct.." .. ~.p""; WO""'Lok. 51"eIy (S .. nd .... 0' s.. ......... laIl [)eoportrM",.f Comm"oi", & [,an.""" Dovolop", •• ' (CEO)-I'II",,'", -. ___ ""Clty-'IJIS~_G<""'W"" __ W"'9,gS1 ThowblOCl ...... o..rano .... toMP·EAan"," ay '" lIorr .. n c"mp,.h"", ... t;ond U .. MOP in!! 1M on tho c.ti. 20""", Mop ~ .... _.~ .. b<..-._oI'oa>rd .. ' ...... fur\I>01"w ............ onthi$,..""",..j,..OJO(t,~I ... ,h •• l .. m .nd ,",",n I., """ of 1Io",.n. CEO -, .. .., ..... o .... ~"". 'DS~ So. G<..ty W ... ""n""'. W~ ~1. -e [.",.nm,n'" Docum.n".ho. hoi""" th. P'OPO'"" P'ojOCl, O"'.lo'""n'RqvIIIlon. !iM~ f., P,oJ.n Mllllotion: Th. O'"loct "Ill 1M ,"bl'ct to ,~. City'. ~ePA .,d,n'nto, 4-1-130 IflOUSTIIIAL DEVELOPMfNT $T<lNDAAll5, ... ~ 5HO~fUNf PMSlE~ P~OGAAM III:GIIlATlOfIS. -...010 (NWIOfIMliNTM nYlr'N JlltDCfDUIlH 'NI 1liiie, .opll<.O~I. ,.d".nd ,",vl."on, "'PP'OP'"" •. , ... 1._.1 MItII.t<>n Mu,.,.... will IiUfy bo ............ on tho pro ....... O<Olort Tho .. rocomm.ndoO M~;I""'" ..... ", ... dd, .... protect ""porn "01 <0' .... ~V .,I.tin, <0 •• , ,no .... "'.~on' ., <Itod .b""" The applicant shall comply with the recommendations inclUded In the Stream Study Narrative and Habitat Doto Report, prepared by AMEC Fa5ter Wheeler, doted January 2016. PL[A5{ INCLUDE TJoIE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALUNG FOR PF\OP{R f1U 1DENTlflCATION CONTACT PERSON: Vanessa Dolbee, Current Planning Manager; Tel: (425)430- 7314; Eml: IIdolbee@rentonwa.goli . If \'0" wO"t~ I'k. to ~. m,d' 0 porty 01 '.<o,d '" 'oco'" furth., ""_"" on .... pro"""d ",ojOCl. ",,"!HI' """ form ,nd ' .. "'" to City.1 R,nt.n. tre _~onntn. O,,,,'on. 'D~S So Gr.<!v W"'I. Rento ... WA.&OS 1 N.m./F,I< No, _"'0 Ap'"",,, HI Cl MAX!LUA\6 ooool!. rtF, W NAM!':::~===========:;:;;,:;;;;;::======= MAJUNC.I\OORHS UI'I11""'/l>p T.L,PHO ... OIQ, I / CERTIFICATION I, ~ go t ~ , hereby certify that 2) copies of the above document were posted in =-conspicuous places or nearb; thj ~cribed property on Date: i-ICrl (p SignedYflct~(,-~k STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Va () ( Sf", DaUeR: Signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary {Print}: ._, • • Agencies See Attached Mark Clement Applicant City of Renton Owner 300' Surrounding Properties See Attached (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 1e.",,;~{ C:, .. '(\e{o~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for;u,1t )I;;q..!l-'J.a mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 6a4wo"j 20 '?olC, J the State of Notary (print):. _____ .!.lIf,~44-'"DI-! .....:.r2"""I.!J"'«£~ _________ _ My appointment expires: w~ oN( ()o11 Boeing Apron A 737 C1 MAX LUA16-000028, ECF, SM template -affidavit of service by mailing ----------------------------------- • • AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology •• Dept. of Ecology" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept ... Environmental Review Section Attn: Misty Blair Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 PO Box 47703 39015 _172" Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region· Duwamish Tribal Office· Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program •• Attn: Ramin Pazookl 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Laura Murphy King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015172" Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers· KC Wastewater Treatment Division· Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program •• Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Attn: Erin Slaten Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin 39015 172" Avenue SE PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Boyd Powers··· WDFW -Larry Fisher' Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation· Depart. of Natural Resources 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Attn: Gretchen Kaehler PO Box 47015 Issaquah, WA 98027 PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Tim McHarg Attn: Charlene Anderson, AICP, ECD 35030 SE Douglas 5t. #210 Director of Community Development 220 Fourth Avenue South Snoqualmie, WA 98065 12835 Newcastle Way, Ste 200 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Newcastle, WA 98056 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Wendy Weiker, Community Svcs. Mgr. Jack Pace, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt 355 110'" Ave NE 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 Mailstop EST 11W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 8ellevue, WA 98004 Seattle Public Utilities Puget Sound Energy Timothy C. Croll, Doug Corbin, Municipal Liaison Mgr. Attn: SEPA Responsible Official 6905 South 228'" St 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Kent, WA 98032 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 ·Note: If the Notice of Application states that It is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, and the Notice of Application. "Department of Ecology is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email address: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov .. Karen Walter, laura Murphy and Erin Slaten with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. are emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice to the following email addresses: KWalter@muckleshoot.nsn.us I Laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.usL erin.slaten@muckleshoot.nsn.us ···Department of Natural Resources is emailed a copy of the Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT, & Notice the following email address: sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov template -affidavit of service by mailing 4182300000 Current Resident 520 W PERIMETER RD Suite 9 Renton, WA 98057 4182300000 Current Resident 520 W PERIMETER RD Suite 12 Renton, WA 98057 4182300000 Current Resident 520 W PERIMETER RD Suite 11 Renton, WA 98057 4182300000 Current Resident 500 W PERIMETER RD Suite 2 Renton, WA 98057 4202401210 SB CAPITAL LLC 4004 NE 4TH ST #107-168 RENTON, WA 98056 4202401255 Current Resident 453 Rainier Ave N Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 MOSS ROAD L L C 6923 40TH AVE SW SEATILE, WA 98036 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 301 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 304 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW Renton, WA 98057 • 4182300000 Current Resident 500 W PERIMETER RD Suite 5 Renton, WA 98057 4182300000 Current Resident 520 W PERIMETER RD Suite 8 Renton, WA 98057 4182300000 Current Resident 520 W PERIMETER RD Suite 7 Renton, WA 98057 4182300000 Current Resident 500 W PERIMETER RD Suite 3 Renton, WA 98057 4202401210 SB CAPITAL LLC 625 Rainier Ave N LOT Renton, WA 98057 4202401305 CHRISTOPHERSON R LEE 503 RAINIER AVE N RENTON, WA 98055 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 404 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 102 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 104 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 201 Renton, WA 98057 • 4182300000 Current Resident 500 W PERIMETER RD Suite 1 Renton, WA 98057 4182300000 Current Resident 520 W PERIMETER RD Suite 10 Renton, WA 98057 4182300000 Current Resident 500 W PERIMETER RD Suite 6 Renton, WA 98057 4182300000 Current Resident 500 W PERIMETER RD Suite 4 Renton, WA 98057 4202401255 U-HAUL REAL ESTATE COMPANY DBA U-HAUL CO / WESTERN WA 701.49 PO BOX 29046 PHOENIX, AZ 85038 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 101 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 203 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 402 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 202 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 103 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 • 4202401335 • 4202401335 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 205 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 204 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 303 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 4202401335 4202401335 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 403 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 401 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 105 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 4202401335 4202401335 4202401335 Current Resident Current Resident Current Resident 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 305 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 405 400 Taylor Ave NW APT 302 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 4202401400 4202401400 4202401425 SENECA REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS Current Resident Current Resident 8921 NE 118TH PLACE 401 Rainier Ave N 409 Rainier Ave N KIRKLAND, WA 98034 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 4202401425 4202401425 4202401500 Current Resident Current Resident CHANG BROTHERS INC 415 Rainier Ave N 419 Rainier Ave N 505 Rainier Ave N Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 4202401505 9564800071 9564800071 CHRISTOPHERSON R LEE OLA BABATUNDE Current Resident 503 RAINIER AVE N 1813 NW 6TH ST 108 NW 6th St RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 9564800072 9564800072 9564800102 HILL MICHAELJEROME+ANDES N Current Resident KEODARA HOPE 102 NW 6TH ST 102 NW 6th St 101 NW6THST RENTON, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98057 9564800102 9564800103 9564800103 Current Resident SMITH JAM IAN Current Resident 101 NW 6th St 1075 BLAIN AVE NE #B 107 NW 6th St Renton, WA 98057 RENTON, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98057 9564800104 9564800110 9564800170 SOUTHCOTT KENITH JAMES+ElIN KING COUNTY-PROPERTY SVCS SB CAPITALLLC 111 NW 6TH ST ADM-ES-0800 4004 NE 4TH ST #107-168 RENTON, WA 98057 500 4TH AVE RENTON, WA 98056 SEATTLE, WA 98104 9564800170 9564800175 9564800175 Current Resident SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PA Current Resident 601 Rainier Ave N LOT 5950 4TH AVE S 575 Rainier Ave N Renton, WA 98057 SEATTLE, WA 98108 Renton, WA 98057 9564800176 MILLER WAYNE PO BOX 58187 -RENTON, WA 98058 723059053 FACILITIES & OPERATION CTR OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIR 300 SW 7TH ST RENTON, WA 98055 ------------------------------ • 9564800176 Current Resident 515 Rainier Ave N Renton, WA 98057 723059053 Current Resident 405 Logan Ave N Renton, WA 98057 • 82000000 Current Resident 410 Taylor Ave NW UNIT A Renton, WA 98057 Denis Law Mayor January 20, 2016 Mark Clement • The Boeing Company PO Box 3707 MC lW-09 Seattle, WA 98124 Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip'Vincent, Administrator Subject: Notice of Complete Application Boeing Apron A 737 C1 MAX, lUA16-000028, ECF, SM Dear Mr. Clement: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has determined that t'he subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on February 8, 2016. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7314 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Vanessa Dolbee Current Planning Manager cc: City of Renton IOwner(s) Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov , • l' LUA "-0 oooz8 City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E·MAIL ADDRESS: 206 617- 2944 NAME: City of Renton Mark.d .clement@boeing.com ADDRESS: 1011 Perimeter RD W PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME Apron A 737 C1I MAX CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 PROJECT1ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER: 4254307400 616 W PERIMETER RD 98055 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Mark Clement KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 072305-9007 COMPANY (if applicable): Boeing EXISTING LAND USE(S): Manufactoring, Airport ADDRESS: PO Box 3707 MC 1W-09 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Manufactoring, Airport CITY: Seattle ZIP: 98124 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION TELEPHONE NUMBER 206617-2944 (if applicable): NA CONTACT PERSON EXISTING ZONING 1M NAME: Mark Clement PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): same as existing , SITE AREA (in square feet): 13,650 COMPANY (if appliCable): .•. Boeing Co. ~ :: ... ":. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE . DEDICATED:none ADDRESS: PO Box 3707 MC 1W-09 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: , CITY: <·'./i Renton' ZIP: 98124 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UN,ITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NA " ....... __ ~ r~U"~ prp.t~ NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NA ~'\>.._,-. ..J ,-- , Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/pJanninglmaSlerapp.doc 01111116 ( P ECT INFORMATION {"~'-'L;' NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NA PROJECT VALUE: 8 MILLION IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE BUILDINGS (if applicable): NA 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL IJ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NA 0 FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL 0 GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): 1560 0 HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable) :360 0 SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES 13,650 _ sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if 0 WETLANDS sq. ft. applicable):same NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): 100 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY t. legal -'. on sheet with the '_n. information inclurlp.dl SITUATE IN THE -ne QUARTER OF SECTION 7_, TOWNSHIP _23n_, RANGE_5e_, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. _SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT --3. - 4. 2. - Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ Billed_ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I. (Print Name/s) {y\ A'/.. \,( C 1 <:. M r.rJt , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application" or ~ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the forego'ing statements and a wars herein lain and the infonnation herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowled~ ~nd belie~. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~-r~ "-...I-e. ~ ...... +-- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. "'\\\\\\\ .... ',' III1 ~ ~~ R. MO~ 1111 .:::: ~~ ,""\\\\1\11/ ';II " -.5....' ...... , ~ E'''' I" 'I = ~ ~~~\o I\~/~/II ~ -.... -~ AD .~/, '/. ~ : () ff~ 0"',... ... " \(iI~ ~ \J f\" ~ 3:a oi!' ... ~ z :::: Notary (Print) ~\ ,.w~· ~ "4'-~r...., %8 .... ,CJ i ~ § , ~ "" .ou~" Cb E ,'" :: I "-0>'" ""'-'!;:'-Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary 0 J &'''~ r'll, 8.21 '" ... ~ .... ~ .: () "d"l :: .... \ .'111 "1""1\'"""",,, ",,-<:' .: My appointment expires: ___ -'---=:.--'--<~;,<...::'_'_'''_ 11111 t:: OF '1'1 r>.: .... , ...... ' . /111\\\\\\""" Q:web/pw/devserv/formslplanninglmasterapp.doc 2 Ot/ll/16 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUlv AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED BY:. BY: Arborist Report , VuLJ Biological Assessment, lGD Calculations 1 Colored Maps for Display, lAO Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND, Deed of Right-of-Way Dedication 1 Density Worksheet, Drainage Control Plan 2 Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural,.No, Environmental Checklist, Vii) Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy) lAND' Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) lANDO Flood Hazard Data, 1Iv{J Floor Plans 3 AND' Geotechnical Report >AND 3 Grading Elevations & Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Elevations & Plan, Detailed 2 Habitat Data Report 4 (;1;i) Improvement Deferral, Irrigation Plan, 1 H :\CE O\Data \Forms· T emplates\Self·H elp Handouts\Pla nning\ Waiversu bmitta Ireqs.docx COMMENTS: uI1.JIA(Jlrill/() iYu:, f~/jtt«J (1(), (){iJ .4'ltVl.s-or CQ.ss IV , .v , DYlvl}U Wa Ih!o7y.drhS" hhli,1' Jtc/;h ,(yt'UMJPI< "- JAN 1 4 2016 (~, .• -\? ..... -:: r ·,..n' ... .....,..1"~ --. -'''-'' Reii,02/2015 , "10 ~iV1SI0N • '. LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: BY: BY: King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site. Landscape Plan, Conceptual. Landscape Plan, Detailed. Legal Description. Letter of Understanding of Geological Risk. Map of Existing Site Conditions. Master Application Form. Monument Cards (one per monument) 1 Neighborhood Detail Map. Overall Plat Plan. Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis. Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Post Office Approval 2 Plat Name Reservation. Plat Plan 4 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 VUJ Public Works Approval Lette" Rehabilitation Plan 4 Screening Detail. Shoreline Tracking Worksheet 4 Site Plan 2 AND 4 Stream or Lake Study, Standard. Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental, Stream or Lake Mitigation Plan 4 Street Profiles 2 Title Report or Plat Certificate 1 AND. Topography Map 1 Traffic Study 2 V0r' Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan. (/ VLD I [;Y7)/lI~' No Irao 'I h l1/Jffk If Urban Design Regulations Analysis. Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Final. Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary • lA.lJ 2 H: \CE D\Da ta \Forms-T em plates\Se If-He I p Han dou ts\P la n ni ng\ Wa ive rsu b m itta r reqs. docx Rev: 02/2015 LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Wetlands Report/Delineation 4 Wireless: I mt Agreement :'ANO' 'of Fvi'tin~ Sites 2 AND 3 Lease , Draft 2 AND 3 Map of I : Site r, ",.,. ; 'AND' Map of View Area 2ANO' Photosimulations 2 AND' This Requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services 2 Development Engineering Plan Review 3 Building 4 Planning WAIVED MODIFIED BY: BY: 3 H:\CED\Data\Forms-Templates\Self·Help Handouts\Planning\Waiversubmittalreqs.docx COMMENTS: , Rev: 02/2015 • • City of Renton Shoreline Permit Project Narrative (updated 02/28/16) Apron A CI Project Project Name, Size, and Location RECE\VED MAR 1 4 2016 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DiVISION The project is the 737 Max Flightline Utilities -Apron A CI Project. The project owner is Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle District, and the project location is the City of Renton -Renton Municipal Airport.' Boeing has leased property from Renton Airport, and Boeing will make required infrastructure improvements to support the increased production rates required for the Boeing MAX CI Program (737 production). The site is located midfield on the eastside of Runway 16/34 between the taxiway and the east perimeter road. The area is largely flat impervious pavement used for aircraft parking. The site is fenced from public access. Since the property is located on the airfield, planning use is largely designated in the Airport Master Plan. The Master Plan is dated 1997 and is currently being updated. The new master plan will be reviewed and approved by various local, regional, state and federal agencies to permit long range programming. Zoning Designation of Site and Adjacent Properties The zoning designation for the property per the Renton Zoning Code is Medium Industrial (1M), with Comprehensive Plan Designation as Urban Center-North 2 (UC-N2). Current Use of Site and Existing Improvements The current use of the site is a single Boeing aircraft stall, stall A-9. The stall is used for de-icing and includes a blast fence on the north and south side of the stall. The area has concrete and asphalt pavement, and associated parking and fencing. Existing buildings include a crew shelter and several sheds used for tool and equipment storage. The site has existing infrastructure improvements including sewer, water, electrical and storm available for tie-in. See figure 1 on the next page. 10f4 . , "' ~-----------------------------------------------------------------l • • Figure 1: Existing Improvements Special Site Features (Wetlands, Water Bodies, Steep Slopes) The Cedar River is located within lOa' of the eastern edge of the project site. Soil Type and Drainage Conditions Soil conditions for the site indicate soils up to 15 feet thick of fine to medium sand and silt. A lens of peat was encountered in two of the borings, at depths of 15 and 30 feet. Groundwater depths are expected to be 3-5 feet below predeveloped ground surface, and will fluctuate with the season and precipitation. Footing subgrades will be designed and prepared in accordance with the geotechnical report recommendations. If loose or unstable soils are encountered during construction the subgrade will be over-excavated as required by the geotechnical engineers. Stormwater upgrades will use City of Renton or Boeing details as applicable. The storm system will capture pavement flows and route the runoff to oil water separator(s) and storm filter vaults as required to meet discharge criteria. A lift station will be required to discharge stormwater flows to the downstream system. During de-icing operations, flows will be directed to a separate vault system, and discharged to sanitary sewer. A lift station will be required to discharge sanitary flows to the downstream system. A drainage report is included with this application and contains additional required details related to the storm water conveyance system. 20f4 • • In addition to stormwater features, the apron aircraft parking positions that will park fueled aircraft will have trench grates to collect a fuel spill should it occur. The fuel will be directed to a 10,000 gallon fuel containment vault. The flow will be directed to the vault using an emergency button accessible at the apron. Proposed Use of the Propertv and Scope of the Proposed Development The site will be upgraded with infrastructure improvements to support the parking of two (2) Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall will be able to accommodate de-icing operations. Improvements include pavement repair and replacement, aircraft parking support infrastructure including water, air, electrical, lighting and storm water drainage improvements; and a support structures tool room. The existing crew shelter will be relocated. Two existing blast fences will be relocated to the east side of the stall. New pavement will extend north of the existing into the grass field. The pervious surface eliminated by this new pavement will be planted elsewhere on Boeing maintained property, in order to maintain no net loss of pervious surface in the shoreline zone. Proposed Structures and utilities in the 200' Shoreline Zone Building structures One new building will be installed for crew operations; one small crew shelter will be relocated as follows: • 1 each 24'x65', 15'ft H new super cabana building, • 1 each 12'x 30' 12'ft H existing modular crew shelter will be relocated approx 120' ft to the north Utilities Istructures • 2 each -122'6",12'4" H existing blast fences will be relocated within the apron. • 2 each -existing light stands on 16' high poles with concrete bases will be relocated within the Apron, with the fixtures directed toward the Apron and pointed away from the Cedar River. • 2 each -new light stand on 16' high pole with concrete bases will be located within the Apron, with the fixtures directed toward the Apron and pointed away from the Cedar River. • 1 each -new 30ft high light stand next to the Super cabana with the fixtures pointing away from the Cedar river Cubic yards of grading 3.900 • Concrete = 2,300 CY • Base = 1,600 CY • Excavation = 3,900 CY (For pavement section reconstruction) LF of a II utilities a nd type • Domestic Water -540 LF • Sanitary Sewer -340 LF • Lighting -725' 30f4 -------------------------------------------- I " , • • • 208V Power stand -450' • 480V Power stand -450' • 400 Hz Power -630' • Telecomm line-275' • Storm pipe -1,450 LF Sq ft of impervious -pervious mitigation. • SF of new impervious pavement within 200 foot shoreline boundary = 8,020 SF • SF of new pervious landscaping within 200 foot shoreline boundary = 8,020 SF Access Access to the site will be via East Perimeter Road. Proposed Off-site improvements Offsite improvements are limited to new pavement along the south side of the compass calibration pad. This is located just outside of Boeing's lease area. Total Estimated Construction Cost Estimated construction cost is approximately $8 million. Trees to be removed No trees are proposed to be removed. Estimated Quantities Concrete = 2,300 CY Asphalt = 1,600 CY Land to be dedicated to the City None proposed. Proposed Job Shacks. Sales Trailers. and Model Homes A job shack may be provided on site during construction. Proposed Modifications None proposed. Information for Projects located within 200 feet of Cedar River The eastern edge of the site is approximately 50 feet from the OHW of the Cedar River. There are no existing or proposed residential units within the project site. 40f4 ' .. "'DOWL December 4, 2015 W.O. 13726 • Joseph Farah City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, 5th floor Renton, W A, 98051-3232 • RE JA" 1 v. I~ c~·.. ..~:\j PU"\",',,...-)I",,~,ON Re: Boeing 737 MAX Flightline Utilities Apron A -Construction adjacent to USACE levee Dear M r. Farah: Thank you for meeting with us at the Renton Municipal Airport to review the proposed Boeing project located on Apron A, within Boeing's lease area. On behalf of the Boeing Company, this letter includes our request to construct the proposed improvements adjacent to the existing US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) levee along the Cedar River. Our understanding is that the City of Renton and USACE will complete an engineering review of the proposed improvements, in lieu of completing a procedural review, as described in 33 USC 408 (Section 408). The proposed project includes the following elements, as shown in the attached Figure 1: Site Plan: I) Construction of new asphalt pavement and cement concrete pavement. 2) Installation of new utilities, including storm drainage, fire water, domestic water, sanitary sewer, compressed air, and electrical. Approximate locations are shown in Figure I. 3) Construction of new buildings, including a 24' X 50' Super Crew Shelter, 24' X 50' Super Cabana (for tool storage), 20' X 12' restroom, and 10' X 10' covered storage area for maintenance equipment. 4) Relocation of two existing blast fences. This will include construction of new concrete foundations. Proposed work will not be located within the existing USACE levee. Utility trenching and construction of blast fence foundations will be within 15 feet of the USACE levee. The proposed construction located closest to the levee is shown in Sections A-A, B-B, and C-C (Figures 2 -4). The proposed work has been reviewed by Boeing's geotechnical engineer, C.J. Shin, of Soil and Environmental Engineers (SE&E). The results of the SE&E analysis is included as Attachmeut A. In general, Boeing's geotechnical engineer's opinion is that the project "will not impose adverse impacts on the seepage pattern and structural integrity of the existing levee." The proposed work has also been reviewed versus other previous projects in the nearby vicinity. The Boeing Apron A Duct Bank project, constructed in 2014, included the construction of utilities along the toe of the levee. Utilities included a concrete duct bank, approximately 3' wide by 3' deep, and related utility vaults. The duct bank was located along the toe of the levee; the approximate location of the duct bank is highlighted in Figure I. Relevant plans for the previous Apron A Duct Bank Project are included for reference as Attachment B. 425-869·2670 • 800-865-9847 (fax) • 8420 154th Avenue NE • Redmond, Washington 98052 • www.dowl.com Alaska _ Arizona _ Colorad,? _ Montana _ North Dakota • Oregon _ Washington _ Wyoming Mr. Joseph Farah City of Renton December 4, 2015 Page 2 • • The previous Apron A Duct Bank project was reviewed by City of Renton and USACE staff, and the improvements were found to be acceptable. A Section 408 review was not required. On behalf of the Boeing Company, we are requesting City of Renton/USACE engineering review and approval of the proposed improvements, in lieu of completing a procedural review, as described in 33 USC 408 (Section 408). Please let us know you approve this request, or need any additional information. Sincerely, DOWL Darren Murata, P.E. Project Manager Figures! Attachments: • Figure I: Site Plan • Figure 2: Section A-A • Figure 3: Section B-B • Figure 4: Section C-C • Attachment A: SE&E letter (9/30115) • Attachment B: Apron A Duct Bank Plans 425-869-2670 • 800-865-9847 (fax) • 8420 154th Avenue NE • Redmond, Washington 98052 • www.dowl.com Alaska • Arizona _ Colorado _ Montana • North Dakota _ Oregon _ Washington • Wyoming • <> ~ , ~ • \ \ ., Q I N ~ 5 N ., J, ,- ~ 5 N ~ ~ -< .I 6 1= U w ~ " -< ~ r ~ j ~ c e 5: '5 9- Q -< U ~ ~ 5 I ~ N ~ ~ ;;- 5 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 • • 3LAST ~ I-----FENCE·----'\-----! \:~--15-.0,--' +-f-----~<l.c-.I =RO~AD~----I 1------4------I~~~----4~---9~.O·,1 ~8.=8'--~ h \ 5.6' \ \ L APPROX. TOE L ~\ OF LEVEE \ BLAST FENCE J \ \ TOE OF SL PE FOUNDATION \ ~I \.. XISTING DUCT '--EXISTING (ROUND ?ANK LOCATI N 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 o 0 FIGURE 2: APRON A SECTION A-A SCALE: 1" = 20' HORZ. & 1"=10' VERT. o ________________________________________________ ~ ---------~~-------~----------------- 50 ,45 • .s '" ~ 40 ~ .:; ~ 35 o .!, ., :3 30 N i'! « o ~ 25 « ~ ~ ~ 20 o ~ I ~ 15 o N ~ .g 5 ..: I « z g 0 ~ • el PROPOSEr \ :::r:: U) GRAD x APRO~ A \ LLJ / I L EXISTIN --C;ROUN .; PROPOSED 96" J CATCH BASIN • ~ ROA~ 9.2' B.b, 24.7' I / / / ~ ~ ..... ,_/ I '-AP PROX. TOE L EXISTING ROADWAY FLOOD VIALL EM~ANKMENT EXISTING DITCH ~ FIGURE 3: APRON A SECTION B-B ~ :'i SCALE: 1" = 20' HORZ. & 1"= 1 0' VERT. ~ e ~ :> ~ !< ~ ~ 5 I ~ N '" n ;;-.. !;! 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 o crL-________________________ ~ 50 il 45 E " w g: 40 <\ 35 ~ I ~ ~ 30 i" "' o ~ 25 "' "' iii :3 20 ~ I I 5 15 N i" ., o b 10 ~ "- ~ • ~ 5 I "' 5 E 0 l!i o "' "- ~ "' :'i ~ "' e ~ :> '5 9- ~ u ~ ~ o I ~ N ~ '" ~ ;:! • • I APPROX. TOE BLAST..., OF ROADWAY I-FENCE,----''k-I\---I---c.-:=:-cpml-(, wlmmJ:<'lS)I:.""---I.,-+--F:::M BAN K~ ENT ---+----1 I \...,.., GRA)E ~ ROAP c.XISTINb ~ GROUND fP, 10.5' ~ FOUNDATION " / -I--6.4' I-19.5' -uIL WATER SEPARATOR FUEL ~ PILL VAULT CONTAINMENT:--j-----+ ITANK I L EXISTING [LOOf) ~IAI I FIGURE 4: APRON A SECTION C-C SCALE: 1" = 20' HORZ. & 1"=10' VERT. 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 o 0L-________________________ ~ ,--------------------------~ • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Apron A CI project 2. Name of applicant: The Boeing Company 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Boeing Commercial Airplanes Attention: Mark Clement -, Facilities Permits/Land Use The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707, MIS 1W-09 Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 Phone: 206-617-2944 4. Date checklist prepared: Jan 2016 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): RECEIVED JAN 20 2016 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION Construction activities are anticipated to begin in April 2016 and are expected to be completed by late 2016 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The following documents have been or will be prepared for the project: • Stream study-AMEC • Geotechnical Report,-S&EE • Technical Information Report -Dowl group • Flood report -Dowl group • Lighting Impingement study-Casne Engineering ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1119/2016 • • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, NONE KNOWN 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Federal • 7460 • NEPA ~ • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Stormwater General Permit King County • Industrial Wastewater Construction Dewatering Permit City of Renton • Environmental Review • Civil Engineering Review • Construction ( Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Fire protection) and Building Permits, 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The site will be upgraded with infrastructure improvements to support the parking of two (2) Boeing 737 aircraft. Each stall will be able to accommodate de-icing operations. Improvements include pavement repair and replacement, aircraft parking support infrastructure including water, air, sanitary sewer, electrical, lighting and storm water drainage improvements; and a support structures tool room. The existing crew shelter and will be relocated north. Two existing blast fences will be relocated to the east side of the stall. One super crew shelter will be installed outside the 200ft shoreline zone New pavement will extend north of the existing into the grass field. The pervious surface eliminated by this new pavement will be planted elsewhere on Boeing maintained property, in order to maintain no net 1055 of pervious surface in the shoreline zone. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2 1/19/2016 • • to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. . The project is located at the Renton Municipal Airport on Boeing (leased property) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): IFlat,1 rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soil type is primarily sandy silt loam. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes, the City of Renton has identified the area as presenting a seismic hazard due to potential liquefaction during a seismic event. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Excavation for utilities and fill of clean native soil for compaction. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, soils will be exposed during project construction presenting a risk for erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 98% of the site is currently covered with impervious surfaces. There will be no increase in impervious due to the project h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A temporary erosion and sediment control plan will be developed consistent with City of Renton standards to identify the temporary erosion control measures that will be used by contractor. These elements may include minimizing exposed soils, stabilizing exposed soils, using erosion control fences, inlet protection and other typical best management practices. The project will obtain coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit through Ecology and will be required to maintain a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, install, inspect and maintain erosion control ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3 1/19/2016 . --.-.----'--------------------~-----------------'- 2. Air • • features on the site, monitor discharges and submit discharge monitoring reports to Ecology. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and exhaust from construction equipment will be generated during project construction activities. The completed project will not result in any change in existing operational air emissions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. There are no off-site sources of emissions or odor that will affect the proposed project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Mitigation measures to reduce emissions include ensuring that machines and equipment used during construction are well maintained and employ legally required emission control equipment. Dust will be minimized through use of appropriate best management practices to the activities that may create dust, such as wetting of exposed soils or utilization of tools equipped with dust collection systems. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Lake Washington is located to the north of the site. The Cedar River is located to the west of the project site and drains to Lake Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Part of the project is on the 200ft shoreline zone (see attached drawings for details) 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are proposed with the project. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 4 1/1912016 • • 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. FEMA Community Panel Nos. 53033C0664 and 53033C0977F indicate that the project site is not located within a special flood hazard area. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. The proposed project does not involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Dewatering will be necessary in order to construct and utilities trenching. Bore sample testing has been conducted across the site to confirm groundwater elevations. See Geotech report for information on groundwater levels 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. There will be no discharges to the ground from septic tanks and other sources c. Water runoff (including storm-water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff will result from stormwater generated on the project site. In the existing and proposed conditions, site drainage sheet flows to piped conveyance systems. In the existing conditions oil/water separation is provided. The proposed condition oil/water separation and a water quality vaults. Drainage from the site outfalls to Cedar River, This treatment system will be located within a centrally located site drainage basin. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The only potential for waste material is from accidental spills of fuel or other'liquids during project construction. The contractor will be required to maintain spill kits on site to address potential spills during construction and Boeing has an established spill prevention and counter measures program for site operations. All storm water drain inlets in and around the ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 5 1/19/2016 • • proposed construction operations and staging areas will be protected with inlet protection BMP. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Existing drainage patterns for the site will be retained. Drainage from the project will continue to be conveyed to existing stormwater outfalls that discharge to Cedar River. The Cedar River is an exempt surface water, as classified by the Washington State Department of Ecology; and therefore, flow control for the project is not required. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: [gJ Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: Cottonwood [gJ Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other [gJ Shrubs [gJ Grass o Pasture o Crop or grain D Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, Other: reed canary grass, soft rush, slough sedge o Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other o Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? See project landscaped plans c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Migratory Salmon, steelhead in nearby Cedar River d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: New landscaping near parking areas 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, Iherod, ea I songbirds, other: IseagullS!, Icrow4. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beave ,other: Fish: bass, Isalmolll, trou herring, shellfish, other: I'ong fin smel. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Puget Sound Steel head and their status are under the ESA, the species is listed as "threatened," as are Puget Sound Chinook salmon and coastal/Puget Sound bull trout. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes, the site is part of the Pacific Flyway; see the 2003 Boeing EIS. Puget Sound Chinook salmon, Puget Sound steel head trout, coho salmon, sockeye ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6 1119/2016 ---------------------------------------- • • salmon, coastal cutthroat trout, and non-anadroumous rainbow trout use the Cedar River and Lake Washington as migration routes. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Redirecting exterior lighting away from the Cedar River and toward the Airport Apron. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy efficient lighting systems. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not Applicable b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? No existing noise sources would affect the proposed project. The project is located adjacent to the Renton airport runway and there is noise from landing and departing aircraft. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment noise 6:00 AM TO 5:00 PM Monday through Saturday ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 7 1/19/2016 • • 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Contractors will be required to comply with the provisions of WAC 173-60 during construction. All engine-powered equipment will be required to have mufflers installed according to the manufacturers' specification. All equipment will be required to comply with relevant equipment noise standards of the US Environmental Protection Agency. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site adjacent to the parcel is currently used by the Boeing Airplane Programs as a manufacturing site for the Boeing Next-Generation 737 . commercial airplane. The site includes approximately 4.3 million square feet of building space in multiple buildings, outdoor storage and logistics yards, site access roads, parking and other improvements. The site has been used by Boeing since 1941. The project site is bounded to the north by Lake Washington, to the west by perimeter road. To the east the airport landing strips and to the south is airport way b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Small airport office buildings and crew shelters. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? no e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 1M f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The comprehensive plan designation for this property is Urban Center-North. Adjacent plan designations are the same as the project site, with the exception of property to the west, which is designated as Employment Area Industrial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The Cedar River and Lake Washington are shorelines of the state and subject to the Shoreline Management Act. The City's Shoreline Master Program (SMP) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 8 1/19/2016 • • designates the project area as Shoreline High Intensity and it is in Cedar River Reach A and Lake Washington reaches I and J. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, the Cedar River and Lake Washington are identified as environmentally sensitive areas. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Varies, j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal are compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project is compatible with the existing and projected land uses and plans for the site as an airplane manufacturing and assembly facility. No specific measures are planned. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not Applicable 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; 15ft What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping Screening 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9 1/1912016 • • Apron operational lighting, varies. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: New lighting spread will be directed downward towards aircraft and the ground 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Cedar River shoreline trail and park are within the general area of the Renton Site. The Cedar River is used for fishing and boating. The Renton Rowing club operates upstream of the project site and the Renton City Boathouse is located to the northeast. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not Applicable 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No structures of historical significance have been identified on the project site. The Washington State Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data does not identify any properties within the' project area as being on the historic property inventory or register. Mitigation measures identified below will need to be implemented during construction if archaeological resources are encountered during construction. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None have been identified on the project site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Should any unknown archaeological resources be encountered during project activities, ground-disturbing activities will be halted in the area of the find in ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 10 1/19/2016 • • accordance with RCW 27.53.060 (Archaeological Sites and Resources) and RCW 27.44.020 (Indian Graves and Records). A professional archaeologist will be called in to assess the significance of the find, and the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia will be notified so that a course of action can be implemented. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attachment. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? private.shuttle c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No change to existing parking d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, the project utilizes the Renton Municipal Airport and a rail spur for facility operations. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No public trips g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Private shuttle through private road 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not Applicable 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 11 1/19/2016 • • All utilities are currently available at the site, except Septic b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. Electrical power and diesel will be used for construction equipment. Metro Sewer, City of Seattle water, Puget Sound Energy. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complele to the best of my knowledge. I Understand that the lead agency is relying a them to make its decision. Signature:.~ (J Mark D. Clement Date Submitted: __ '_..---="L=---o_-_I_i ___ _ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST --------------------------_._ .. 12 1/1912016 CONSTRUCTION MITIGA TION DESCRIPTION Boeing Commercial Airplane Group Renton, WA Construction Mitigation Measures & Best Practices: All activities will begin with the implementation and installation of Best Management Practices (BMP)). These practices include: Proposed Hauling! Transportation routes Contractors willi follow a city approved route. Construction. The actual Construction will be accomplished by a Construction contractor. The contractor will call for all required inspections, as well as site pre-construction meeting. The contractor will keep records of any special inspections at the construction site • Stall A9 & 10 areas will be fenced to separate the construction site from the rest of the Airport. • A separate construction entrance from East Perimeter Road will be established to keep construction activity off the Airport. • Flaggers will be used to reduce impacts to street access. • Noisy activities will be scheduled during the day as much as possible. • Dump trucks will have a cushion of sand to dampen loading noise. • Trucks will use trailers to reduce the number of trips. • Equipment will be shut off during standby activities to limit noise and exhaust. • Materials will be recycled to the extent possible minimizing debris, hauling and preservation of resources. • Activities will be overlapped as much as possible to shorted duration of overall construction duration. • An asphalt perm will be constructed around the perimeter to contain runoff. Storm Water Construction will start with the implementation and installation of Best Management Practices (BMP) for Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) under supervision of Boeing Environmental personnel. All storm water drain inlets in and around the proposed construction operations and staging areas will be surrounded by oil absorbent padding to mitigate the potential of any hydraulic/fuel leakages emanating from construction machinery entering the watershed Snow. Ice. dirt and mud removal Contractor shall remove snow and ice to the extent necessary to perform the work. The use of calcium chloride or other chemicals will not be permitted to remove snow or ice. Contractor shall assure that vehicles are constructed, loaded, maintained and covered as necessary to prevent the deposition of dirt, mud or other debris on public roadways. Dirt mud or debris shall be removed on continual basis. Any dirt, mud or debris dropped by vehicles shall be removed immediately. Dust Control Through the entire construction period the Contractor shall take all necessary steps to dust control all working area and unpaved roads. The use of calcium chloride or other chemicals will not be permitted for dust control. The Contractor will accomplish dust control by watering and sprinkling to satisfactorily settle the dust. Contractor shall comply with any requirements imposed by law to prevent fugitive dust emissions. All demolished materials and debris will be stockpiled on site to prevent dust and sedimentation from migrating onto roadways. Contractor vehicles that are transporting materials to and from the site will be required to have tires washed prior to leaving the site. This will prevent dust and sedimentation from entering nearby roadways. Airport Mitigation • A pre-construction meeting will set up with the Airport personnel. • The contractor will set up visual controls, and FOD controls including FOD fence. • Contractor will be in communication with airport tower during construction hours. • Contractor personnel will wear reflective vests on Airport apron at all times. APRON A BOEING 737 MAX FLiGHTLINE . TRUCK ROUTE DESTINATION AND ROUTE WILL CHANGE BASED ON MATERIAL AND TRAFFIC PROPOSED TRUCKING HOURS -24 HOURS/DAY -7 DAYIWEEK CONSTRUCTION NOISE WILL ATTEMPT TO BE LIMITED TO 6:00AM rRlIl':TlnN NOISE WILL GENERATE FROM THE FOLLOWING: JA" I 4 ZD'il I'. I OOIQOO .. ,,_ .......... • _.---_~====================,II • 10 Sec.TIO",!. e _jO··Jli.~ 10/'-3" '-.~ 1'1, .. C-Rn.Dc..",rr:o GLA!>T ~E'NcE ".e:C.TION f,,~_OI"" ~O) ~ P('-"'L. @ iyP ~ELOC."TCO (.1&) V"'H~ BL-""~T FILNC.e:. O~"AI'-~ ( m " r ~EL.Oc."'TE:O SIJI"PORT (Za. I;J.tQ'O) ....... ~ , J) J) ---.- }11 I f--I --II------il--~r, "! .. I-II II I r---+----j HI I r==1r:==:1 "+ ',:1 " ."-' -, I , I ' '---3'" STQ PIPE. (31(A"U (\..IelC ! 7'.0" I TO RELOC.A.TEO , , SUPPO~T) T~P. e E.A [NO ("I PU\,c.£S) ELEVA-TION @ Sc..A.L£ ,\'2" ~ "'0" ~ Y·1l. h'" I -, i 1: i --+-(' '"0 m p,", 6.~a It. , .. ~ J!. 0 ~I OR.II.L I '. r Ii.. I-tOL£!I ' ... TO A,Nc.;.O Q, ~L."" 13 c.ONe. " f .",. .'l-1 1 r 1-:;::, ... "OL". 1 SEC.TION ~ np. t-, ""U' .sC.~L£ .;" I'~ 0 . "-0 .. ~ ," I [L ' ~ , .. -" " ::~4-~ SECTION ~ SoC.AL,£" 3 W ' "-0" \ ) \ ) oil,)) ) SHIM: GROu, ) ~ As REQ'O DCT?I<II_ W ~"" "," ['.(PANSION 'l'OINT r--T:"=~----,,,--"""~;=='t-'--T---j (T,P.) ElCl,ST: "" CONe. t .. "~,, SL. .... B "0" j'_Ow .. .,'-0·. ,os'-o· 9_ .s ....... ~(npoFI) SEC. TI ON ~ @ANCJ\OQ, GL"ST F'E'I'K.E: $CALl: Y.:."~I··d I TO t:XIST.' 1'1" C.ONe. SL."'~ (3lJII~T' ~F:"'c.C' SI,)P':>OIl"" wi ,,"UlScr ! eo rTO"" "-A -r-rM.HEO -"NCJlOC, "TO <:.oo.Jc,. So-Ao!! W/I·'.!~·· I~"""tl;-Qo OLT ~OT"""O""" Y"N~ OF" BI. .... 5,T FE"'u. Ll""'f"l~t.cY", C.ON"T:'~ \ ~"JII. )J<.: k':l,,)u( ~ BOl.T " ~'-"~', ~-c.- '" ~ CONe.. / NOTt:: OIM(N510NS GIVSN F"OI~ RfTI:IUNc;L O"'l'f. l{or ... T£O ~O· C?_E -r:,A,1 L~ /. ./ ('11) V.-..NI: I3LASoT fENt..E. 'W/L~"'4 "'TT~c...H£O(T"'P.) --~~ -____ lJ~";" a~" JojIGIoi ,.,.---..s Htfot(,. t~ oo .. r (3L":l.T" ~"'c..c 5VPPO~T wi ~u.ss.E"T c· -,-dp Ii... 1'*\Tr ... CJiEO DETAIL @ 12:\ .sC,A.LE ,\1. .. :' .~ , W .5rMlLa,,1< <?. -,'·0" + .... .... c.. .. o" 'V,lt.N€, -$ SvP?Q~T eA~f Ft. J Ll"A,"~"'<'·J<lJA'I"-.O""'T, TO c..ONC.. !>f. .... 13 \..1/ '''',. J~' I(WII( IlOLT ~OTCr ,~OT""'7'LC 'to", VA.Nt~ NCT SH()w"l ro~ C.("'''tIT." SECTION f£) SC.J>o.LC 3""-0" r ~-·,,,",· -" .. -'"' ',. . -' ----' ,," - JAN 1 <1 28:0 3702~MB "",-, • I __ nl 1iIO" In_I ..-I. • r ~ .. "OYt.1 ... " I D IUSURa. Tt-OE BOEING CO,",PANY D EVERm. WI. 91002 WI. 91201 ... CCEPT .... llITy I C:::;~!' HilS DESIGN "'''0 , ..... M" lu""" , ;;on. --'v.,... ELEVATION SEc..TIONS , DETAILS .It; ~ ,,,T D"",OII rT.Hl.1 D:" I~ 2 lor" ", .• o.e, S"EClrlC..,T1011 IS •• D IEIT. WI. 910JI •• ,.o¥u I. FACILITIES OEPARTMENT D PORIUaD. OR. 91110 I I e-[) RElIO.. WI. 9BOll D IUm~ WI. 11m :.0::: ..;, .. " ,.,gU, ' .... m"BLA:;T FENc..E INSTALLATION POSITION A-g, APRON 'A' S -<= .oDOOOl70ase -~ I I • I • _/ ) -::' • I ! LJ FLOOR PLAN 1/~' -"-0' or-<r &'~ 1 fi~ ~ .... 1lJPS (8 1'UII5) ) I ->"., .. "" """ SHELTER BASE PLAN HOLDO"""l -PLAN ARRANGEMENT 1/8" .. ,'-0" -- ~- ~ % " .. ~ ~ ~ '"'''''' "'" tETAl ROCf ---_ IIVAt \.IfIT IlETAL!ODIIC--- • ."",.., SO'" LEFT ELEVATION ~ 1/.' '" 1'-0" RIGHT ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'·0' II!>:fi.S lIAS[ nrAME y-_--J/r'f HLn KJI(-8OlT I W/21/t't.llNEllBI1IIoIOO BENT P J/16". r 'lilt( """" """'" '-" SECTION DETAIL @ J" .. "-0' --M. .OEING FACIUlTES DEPARn.tENT ~' ___ -1"L-__ ~!!~:::J~!~~ S 1" o AUBURN, WA, 98002 o EVERETI. WA, 98201 o KENT, WA. 98031 o PORlLAND, OR. 97220 • RENTON. WA. 98055 DSEAThE, WA. 98124 ~ " FRONT ELEVATION 1/4" ~ "-0' REAR ELEVATION 1/4" .. ,'-0'" ''''''''''"' "'="":".~ ---L. STARK ....- --.1 .... ,- M. ~~ L "11M '--' ,--' '\ .J JAN 1 t1 ZU',6 . ' .I. _ ....... ~ [l:> [i> [i> INSTALL SHElF" AT "THIS LOCATION AND 6 fEE'T fROM FlOOR. MOUNT ELECTRICAl. MOLDING" FrrT .l.BOVE F1...00R. DOOR STOOP " S1EP -¥t11H ROUNDED CORNERS AND ALlCRIP SURFACE. G:>-(1) 8100 LOOP WAND (52" HIGH). [t:> (2) lSloj PC CABlES (~. HIGH}, [t>-(2) VOICE GRADE PHONE UNts. I}:::> (2) 8100 LOOP SYSmI SCANl'lER tJNlT (65" HIGH). [t:>-INSTALL EXTERNAL WATUI-l1CHT",f' BOX FOR PO'NER. [!:>-INSTAll om:RNAL WATUI-llGHT OJ BOX FOR PHONE. ~ INSTALL ElOERNAL WATUI-llGHT OJ' BOX FOR OAT" CABLES. ID:::> RAMP AND LANDING TO TOOL STQR"GE ROOW. ROUND CORNERS AND R.-.n..s. fiI>-EX'TERN,I.,t. AIR WITH ELBOW !'"OR OIRECT CONNEC- no<, [!l> [!l> [!l> [!l> [!l> (7) '20V DUPLEX RECEPT"ClES U-OFF FLOat (2) DEDICATED '2OV DUPlEX RECEPTACL£S 48" OFT FLOOR. HVAC UNIT WITH WAU.-hAOUNTED 'THERJ.IOSTAT. EX1ERNAL "J" BOX WITH IN'TtRNAl SWITCH RJft LOGO BOX. £X'TERNAL MOUNTED GREEN UGHT HIGH AS Pas- 9Bl.E ON WAU.. 'WITH INTERNAL SWITCH. nt> (3) J6" • 48" 'WINDOWS ANt! (2) :r-a" • 7-0" ODORS 'MTH \-fEW pANL.£S. hAUST RESIST 100 '-!PH 'WINOS. fii::>. <42". 2<4" DEEP COUNTER AROUND WAlL ~ :r. 6'. <42" HIGH COUNT!R wI RCUNDED CORNERS. lli:> il> §> 5:> §> lli:> il> STEP DOWN TRANSfORMER. HEAVY DUTY mm. FLOORING IH TOOL STORAGE ",",", WALl-MOUNTED CABINET (VENlED F'OR Fl.WM.&.BI...E UQlnDS) JIj • 12" (5<4" HIGH). AIR OUTlET IN TOOl STOR"GE ROOM, 56" HIGH. HEAVY DUTY INDOOR/OUTDOOR CARPET' WfYL CO~ WoW..BOARO. (1) 120V DEDICATED 4-PLD: RECEPTABlct (is" OfF FLOOR. 10 LB .a.aC fiRE ExnNGUlSHtR BY BOONG co. CONSlRUCllON NOlES: 1. PftCWTDE .. I'OOT OU,l.,l L.A/.If' CElUNG-UOUNTED FLUOR- ESCENT UCHT flXlURES. :z. lOCATE UGHT FTXT1JRES OVER COIJN1!RS. 3. "TT"CH",r STRIPS FOR COOtOE SHEETS (28} ABOVE 4. INSTALl CEll..JNG HIGH PANEllNG IN TOOL STORAGE 5. PROV1DE HOOK TO HOI.D TOOl.. STORAGE DOORS OPEN. 6. PROVIDE PASSAGE SE1S IN BOTH DOORS. 1RNKA ENGtNEERS CO. lEC: P.O. 80):" 3&45 9EI..L£WE. W.I. 9as08 [ -~ flOOR PLAN 4S. ELEVA1l0NS ~_ 1-.1,.11 A-3 17-71 CREW SHELTERS APRONS A & 0 303292-00 .... AIRPORT RENTON 105 -p-IoIS R /o/SIf3 8, , , • ~/ ~.- DATUM NOTE: PLANS PREPARED USING N(M) 29 Mj THE VERTJOL ~TUt.I. TO CONVERT TO NAVD 88 ADO 3.556 FITT TO Ali ElEVATIONS. , ,----, , , ' , ' ,', ' , i " ----' . '-"~-. ,,,,.-_.-_ .. :. ~ .. ~ ... -.~.~--.--.--.... ~ ....... /PSE unUTY ." ~ , "".'" ",> ' ' , ___ ' . .',', "'"'013'00 00 "'00/ ," //' "/ ,.,, __ -..-"" .. ,"'""'--' , .' '00'644' ..-~ "" ,]':;\,:;.::-;::;~::~"-~::.:-.:--' __ '~l-l~oo=~" J "'~'~'~'-' ~ '- '-, ,.,' ." . 1 I ' /> TMIWAY B ',:T' . .' 7..-_,_ --- ~ , ~ ~~ ~0' r 1';~' .., .. ,"-- -":''''. ,;', :-t ~TI' / ,,:' ,r," <;~:<~:&" \ ;,:",,~ f " > COMPASS '-. •. ,'. \ '-. \ --.•.. , II ' /:' ~,,: ... :, CAUBRATIONPAD'" \\,\ ' \ ~. , '", ':. "~_~CC _"~~~-"-C-"~T',.."",~-"--.~C,..,.·-·-~,.-" -'--.• ~ , •. 1. ", 1 " , ,,,,' s,"' I ,. _"I __ ",~~' i . S'" \ , / / 1/'/ ' , I I 165' / ,~ ,/ \ ~~ , \ ~d' <:c. .' . ... .. --;...} \ ,_ '-. ... , " .' '/' ,/1 / \ '< __ .• " -:.:"/ I \ ~ __ , ... __ ., ,/ I , '-,' .. / : ~,. , ~,.~~ , _' ssB ----,"" ",.-I~ ->- ,-" 'J \ i' { '" ',' ;'- ., , I . -\. ',~.~.~, . CONSTRUCTION NOTES [!:> CONSTRUCT SUPER Co'lIANA. PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (To BE PROVIDED IN SEPARATE SUBlolITT&). [t>INSTAU.. RESTROOIII BUIlDING PER ~ PWlS {TO BE PROVIDED IN SEPARATE SlISWITTAL). D:>INSTAll SUPER CREW SHELTER BY OTHERS {PACIFIC t.IOBILE}. [!':>REWOVE EXISTING BlAST FENCE. PREPARE AND 00\1 FENCE. INSTAll. ON NEW FOUN~TION. SEE , STRUCTURAL PLANS. ~ CONSTRUCT SKYDROl COIJERED STORAGE PER OETAil [J:> 12'X-40' DE-ICE vtHICI.E PARKING. [!> RElOCATE STORAGE SHEO, [J:>RElOCATE BUIlDJNG. '" 15 ° 15 '" 60 ------ - SCAl£; 1:30 ~~~g~ ~~ PLAN ~ LEGEND ---.,--- PROPERTY LEASE UNE ~RT PROPERlY LINE '-----'~ ----. .' ,~,"~' ....... ' , -_,I" " --.... M--- __ --' .. a--- TJ.YJWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (TOFA) RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (ROF.~) 100' SHORElINE SETBfCK TOE OF lEV£[ C(or-R R~ COlol",(RC\I>L Wr-1(RWr-'( BLDG NAME BLDG CORNER NO, NORTHING EASTING BLDG NAME BLDG CORNER NO, NORTHING EASTiNG rti-.IIEINO° --_._--200' SHOREl.JNE srnw:K 1111111111111 lIIIIIII B!AST FENCE TOE OF lEV£[ ,-- 3 ___ - , ~ ~ ~~~--r -.. /~~ ~~ _»~~.:: : _ :- ~~. . ..• /~Ar' 1 "'l!l.~ ~i~"~~~~'~ r' ~ (Tl 'j'WTI tIn' . BQi.''''l!.!' ;:)';<---"l.~~n?i *"'~~: .. "-,, ,I , WJ~~~~X",;;c;;:1'."," ~/:~~lLf '1/·) I.JJ '1_. ~·1\CV 10 (%,Jif~.'£·",s; J ,,~, ...... j :) . "'_/ .. <,;v;;:{'~ -}i .-.. >~. '\' !UJ! ~~: .:<LAN ® 60% SUBMITTAL CIVIL SITE PLAN SITE OS·YD IAASTER ,------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S&EE Job No. 1509 . '_ ... " GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED APRON "A" UPGRADE RENTON AIRPORT S&EE JOB NO. 1509 JANUARY 5, 2016 -.J"- S&EE • • S~££ SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 16625 Redmond Way, Suite M 124, Redmond, Washington 98052, www.SoilEnvironmental.com (425) 868-5868 Mr. Teny Lettic Construction Manager The Boeing Company CC: Mr. Michael Sullivan, PE Mr. Darren Murata, PE Mr. Travis Neu, PE DearTeny: January 5, 2016 Geotechnical Report Proposed Apron "A" Upgrade Renton Airport We are pleased to present herewith our Geotechnical Report for the referenced project. Our services were authorized via work order No. 221 1201#150156, and have been performed in accordance with our proposal dated September 14,2015. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services. Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this report or require additional information, please let me know anytime. Very truly yours, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. C. 1. Shin, Ph.D., P.E. President IS09rpt S& EE TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 2 3.1 SITE HISTORY & GEOLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 SURFACE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................................... 3 3.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................................... .4 3.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................... 4 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING .................................................................................................................................. 4 5.0 ENGINEERING EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................. 5 5.1 FOUNDATION SUPPORT ................................................................................................................................. 5 5.1.1 SPREAD FOOTING DESIGN ...... 5 5.1.2 FOOTING CONSTRUCTION. ...................... . .. ......... 5 5.2 SLAB-ON-GRADE OR LOAD-SUPPORTING MATS ..................................................................................... 6 5.3 UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION .............................................................................................. 6 5.3.1 TEMPORARY SLOPE AND SHORING ... 5.3.2 SUBGRADE PREPARATION .... 5.3.3 DEWATERING .... 5.3.4 BUOYANCY RESISTANCE ... 5.3.5 STRUCTURAL FILL .. . ................................. 6 ..7 .. ........ 7 . ............................................... 8 ..8 5.4 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES ON UNDERGROUND WALLS ................................................................. 9 5.5 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................ 10 5.5.1 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ... 5.5.2 PAVEMENT DESiGN .................................. .. ..10 .. ..... 11 5.6 SEISMIC CONSIDERATION AND HAZARD ............................................................................................... 11 5.7 ADDITIONAL SERVICES ............................................................................................................................... 12 6.0 CLOSURE ............................................................................................................................................................. 13 FIGURE I: SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2: SITE & BORING LOCATION PLAN FIGURE 3: SITE HISTORY MAP FIGURE 4: LIQUEFACTION MAP APPENDIX A: LOG OF PREVIOUS EXPLORATIONS APPENDIX B: LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 1509rpt • S&EE • REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED APPRON "An UPGRADE RENTON AIRPORT For The Boeing Company 1.0 INTRODUCTION We present in this report the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed Apron "A" Upgrade project at Renton Municipal Airport. The project site is located in the eastern portion of the airport. A Site Location Map is shown in Figure I and a Site & Exploration Plan is shown in Figure 2, both are included at the end this report. We understand that the project will upgrade the existing Apron "A" for airplane parking and post-manufacture processing. The upgrade will include expansion of the apron on north and east sides; widening the existing road leading to the Compass Road; installation of a few light-weight structures such as office trailers, crew shelters and storage sheds; installation of new blast fences or relocation of existing fences; and construction of new underground utility lines and vaults. The depth of the utility lines will be around 3 to 7 feet and the depths of the vaults may range from 6 to 15 feet. Minor grading will also be performed. This includes about 1.5 to 2 feet thick of new fill in a narrow strip at the eastern boundary. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our investigation is to provide geotechnical parameters and recommendations for design and construction. Specifically, the scopes of our services have included the followings: 1. Exploration of the subsurface conditions at the project site by the drilling of 10 soil test borings. 2. Exploration of the groundwater conditions by the. installation of a groundwater monitoring well. 3. Engineering evaluations and recommendation regarding the following: Foundation support Excavation shoring and dewatering Pavement sections for new apron and extension to compass road. Underground utility design and construction Earthwork 4. Meeting and communication; 150S'pt S & EE • • 5. Preparation of this geotechnical report. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 SITE HISTORY & GEOLOGY Renton Municipal Airport is located at the south end of Lake Washington. Figure 3 shows that the northern portion of the airport was once under the lake. The Black River used to run out of the lake. flowed south through the site vicinity and then veered west. In 1911, Cedar River flooded Renton. In the following year the town dug a 2000-foot-Iong, 80-foot-wide canal to reroute the course of the Cedar to the north so that it flowed directly into Lake Washington, in the hope of avoiding floods in the future. From July to October 1916, the construction of the Lake Washington Ship Canal lowered Lake Washington 8.8 feet. In the process, the Black River dried up, and the outfall from Lake Washington became the ship canal (reference: Suzanne Larson, History of the Lake Washington Ship Canal, King County Arts Commission, 1975. Introduction, 23.) During WW II, the site area was leveled by up to 8 feet thick of fill. The native soils immediately under the fill include alluvial deposits that are over 100 feet in thickness. These soils are typically soft and unconsolidated in the upper 50 feet and become compact thereafter. Published geologic information (Geologic Map of The Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington by D.R. Mullineaux, 1965) indicates that the alluvial soils are underlain by Arkosic sandstone. S&EE performed a few soil test borings in 2012 - 2013 at North Bridge site located at the north end of Cedar River (see Figure 3). These borings found glacially deposited and consolidated soil (hard silt) at depths of about 150 to 170 feet. Boring data from our previous projects at the south side of Renton Airport show that the hard silt is underlain by sandstone. Seismic Hazards The project site is under the threat of two types of earthquakes -crustal and subduction zone events. The former will result from the movement of the Seattle Fault. This fault is a collective term for a series of four or more east-west-trending, south-dipping fault strands underlying the Seattle area. This thrust fault zone is approximately 2 to 4 miles wide (north-south) and extends from the Kitsap Peninsula near Bremerton on the west to the Sammamish Plateau east of Lake Sammamish on the east. The four fault strands have been interpolated from over-water geophysical surveys (Johnson, et aI., 1999) and, consequently, the exact locations on land have yet to be determined or verified. Recent geologic evidence suggests that movement on this fault zone occurred about I, I 00 years ago, and the earthquake it produced was on the order of a magnitude 7.5. The Cascadia subduction zone (also referred to as the Cascadia fault) is a convergent plate boundary that . I 1509rpt 2 S&EE • • stretches from northern Vancouver Island to northern California. It is a very long .sloping subduction zone fault that separates the Juan de Fuca and North America plates. This fault can generate mega earthquakes having a magnitude of 9 or above. Our previous studies at Boeing Renton Plant have shown that due to its long period/duration, subduction zone earthquakes would cause more severe liquefaction hazard than earthquakes generated by the nearby Seattle fault. A liquefaction map (Figure 4: Preliminary Liquefaction Susceptibility Map of the Renton Quadrangle, Washington by Stephen Palmer) indicates that the project area has high liquefaction susceptibility. 3.2 SURFACE CONDITIONS The project site is bordered by airport runway to the west and Perimeter Road to the east. The road runs along the top of the levy that borders Cedar River to the east. The northwest corner of Apron A connects to Compass Road. The majority of Apron "A"'is covered with concrete and asphalt pavements. The ground surfaces at the north and east sides of the apron are covered with grass lawn. The pavement is in fair conditions. There are some small cracks but no obvious signs of distress. The site surface is very flat. A drainage swale is present along the eastern boundary. The bottom of the swale is about one to two feet below the apron. The top of the levy is about 6 to 7 feet above the apron surface. On September 17 and 18,2015, we explored the subsurface condition at the site by the drilling of \0 soil test borings and the installation of one groundwater monitoring well. The locations of these borings are shown on Figures 2 -Site & Exploration Plan. The ground surface conditions are summarized below. Boring Number Ground Surface Condition B-1 15 inches thick concrete 8-2 4 inches thick asphalt 8-3 5 inches thick asphalt 8-4 Grass 8-5 Grass 8-6 8 inches thick Concrete 8-7 2 inches thick asphalt over 7 inches thick concrete 8-8 9 inches thick concrete 8-9 \0 inches thick concrete 8-10 8 inches thick concrete IS09rpt 3 S&EE • • 3.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The boring logs are included in Appendix A of this report. The subsurface conditions at the site include fill over native soils. The fill ranges from about 3 to 8 feet in thickness and includes sand, silty sand and silt. In general, these soils are at least medium dense or medium stiff in the upper 5 feet and appear to have been placed with some compaction. The exception to this was encountered at Borings B-5 where soft silt is present from the ground surface downward. The native soils below the fill include sand, silty sand and silt. In general, these soils are very loose to loose or very soft to soft. Based on our knowledge of the subsurface conditions in the region, we believe that these soils are underlain by glacially deposited soils a depth of about 150 to 170 feet. 3.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS We installed a groundwater monitoring well in borehole B-3B after the drilling was complete on September 18, 2015. On September 21, 2015, we measured the depth of groundwater table at 6 feet 2 inches below the ground surface. Based on our experience with the subsurface conditions in the site vicinity, we believe that the depth of groundwater is affected by the river level and precipitation. We expect that the groundwater may fluctuate between 4 to 7 feet below ground surface. 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING The soil sample at the depth of 27.5 feet from Boring B-3B was transported to our sub-contracted laboratory, Materials Testing & Consulting, for consolidation testing of a peaty soil. The soil properties were used in the evaluation of consolidation (long-term) settlement. The test results are included in Appendix B. 1509rpt 4 S&EE • • 5.0 ENGINEERING EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 FOUNDATION SUPPORT 5.1.1 SPREAD FOOTING DESIGN We recommend that the proposed blast fences and other light-weight structures be supported by spread footings which can be designed with an allowable bearing load of 1,500 pounds per squire feet (pst). This value includes a safety factor of at least 3, and can be increased by one-third for wind and seismic loads (no increase for blast loads). Based on our estimate, short-term (less than a year) settlement should be about 112 inch, and long-term settlement should be about one inch. Lateral Resistance: Lateral resistance can be obtained from the passive earth pressure against the footing sides and the friction at the contact of the footing bottom and bearing soil. The former can be obtained using an equivalent fluid density of 230 pounds pcf, and the latter using a coefficient of friction of 0.5. These values include a safety factor of 1.5. 5.1.2 FOOTING CONSTRUCTION We recommend that footing subgrades be inspected by our site inspector. In the event that soft, wet or organic soils are present at or near subgrade level, we will provide recommendations regarding over- excavation andlor other method of subgrade stabilization such as the use of geotextile. The contractor should prepare to compact the subgrade with a compactor that weighs at least 800 pounds. The subgrade soil should have adequate moisture content (within +1-2% from optimum) at the time of compaction. A 6-inch thick crushed rock layer should be installed at the bottom of the footing. The crushed rock should have an adequate moisture content (+1-2% from optimum) at the time of placement, and be compacted to a firm and non-yielding condition using the same compactor. Exterior footings should be founded at least 15 inches below the adjacent finished grade to provide protection against frost action. In the event thickened-edges to be constructed, the slope connecting the slab and footing should be 3H: I V or flatter. The flat slope is to prevent subgrade disturbance during rebar installation. 1509rpt 5 S&EE • • ,------------------------------------------------------- 5.2 SLAB-ON-GRADE OR LOAD-SUPPORTING MATS Slab-on-grade or load-supporting mats can be designed using a subgrade reaction modulus of 100 pounds per cubic inches (pci). Similar to footing subgrade preparation, all slabs and mats should be underlain by a 6-inch thick crushed rock layer. The crushed rock should have an adequate moisture content (+1-2% from optimum) at the time of placement, and be compacted to a firm and non-yielding condition using a compactor that weighs at least 800 pounds. Again, if thickened edges are to be installed, the slope between the slab and thickened edges should be 3H: I V or flatter. 5.3 UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION 5.3.1 TEMPORARY SLOPE AND SHORING Temporary cuts can be sloped at IH:IV above the groundwater table, and shoring is likely required below the groundwater table. A variety of shoring methods has been used at Boeing Renton Plant, including trench boxes, steel sheets, timber lagging, and steel sheetpile. We recommend the following soil parameters for any shoring method that requires structural designs. • Soil's total unit weight: 130 pcf(pounds per cubic feet) • Soil's buoyant unit weight: 60 pcf • Active soil pressure: 45 pcf, equivalent fluid density, above groundwater table • Active soil pressure: 21 pcf, equivalent fluid density, below groundwater table • Passive soil pressure: 190 pcf, equivalent fluid density, above groundwater table (include 1.5 safety factor) • Passive soil pressure: 80 pcf, equivalent fluid density, below groundwater table (include 1.5 safety factor) Please note that imbalanced hydrostatic pressure should be added to the active side. The pressure will depend on the type of dewatering method. A 2 feet over-excavation at the passive side should be considered in the design. 1509rpt 6 S&EE e, • 5.3.2 SUBGRADE PREPARATION All loose soil cuttings should be removed prior to the placement of bedding materials. Wet and loose subgrades should be anticipated. The contractor should make efforts to minimize subgrade disturbance, especially during the last foot of excavation. Subgrade disturbance in wet and loose soil may be inevitable, and stabilization is necessary in order to avoid re-compression of the disturbed zone. Depending on the degrees of disturbance, the stabilization may require a layer of quanry spalls (2 to 4 inches or 4 to 6 inches size crushed rock). Based on our experience at Boeing Renton plant, when compacted by a hoepac, a 12 to 18 inches thick layer of spalls would sink into the loose and soft subgrade, interlock and eventually form a stable subbase. A chocker stone such as 1-114" dean crushed rock should be installed over the quanry spalls. This stone should be at least 6 inches in thickness and should be compacted to a firm and non- yielding condition by a vibratory compactor that weighs at least 800 pounds. In the event that soft silty soils above groundwater table are encountered at subgrades, the subgrade should be over-excavated for a minimum of 6 inches. A non-woven geotextile having a minimum grab tensile strength of 200 pounds should be installed at the bottom of the over-excavation and the over-excavation be backfilled with 1-1/4" minus crushed rock. The material should be compacted to a firm a non-yielding condition by the same compactor. 5.3.3 DEWATERING Dewatering will be required for excavations deeper than the groundwater table. Since the depth of groundwater will fluctuate with seasons and precipitation, we recommend that the contractor measure the depth prior to excavation. A groundwater monitoring well is available at Borings B-3B (see Figure 2 for location). Based on our experience with the similar subsoils, we believe that for excavation shallower than 5 feet, dewatering can be successful using local sumps. The contractor should install sumps at locations and spacing that are best fitted for the situation. To facilitate drainage, the slimp holes should be at least 2 feet below the excavation subgrade. Also, the granular backfill around the sump should make hydraulic connection with the crushed rock and quanry spalls placed for subgrade stabilization. For excavation deeper than 5 feet, our experience at Boeing Renton Plant has shown that well-points at 5 to 8 feet spacing had provided adequate dewatering. We suggest that the contractor retain a dewatering specialist for a detailed dewatering design. 1509rpl 7 S&EE e ,e 5.3.4 BUOYANCY RESISTANCE The subsoils below groundwater table will liquefy during strong earthquakes. As such, buoyancy force should be considered in the design. If the self-weight of the structure and equipment is insufficient to resist the buoyancy force, an extended base can be considered for additional resistance. In this case, the additional resistance can be calculated using the weight of the soil above groundwater table and above the extended base. A soil's unit weight of 120 pounds per cubic feet (pcf) can be used for this purpose. Sidewall friction should be ignored. 5.3.5 STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill should be used for all backfill. The Structural fill materials should meet both the material and compaction requirements presented in Section 1509rpt Material Requirements: Structural fill should be free of organic and frozen material and should consist of hard durable particles, such as sand, gravel, or quarry-processed stone. The onsite granular soils above the depth of 3 feet are suitable on a select basis. The soils below groundwater table are not suitable. Suitable imported structural fill materials include silty sand, sand, mixture of sand and gravel (pitrun), recycled concrete, and crushed rock. All structural fill materials should be approved by a site inspector from our office prior to use. Please note that recycled concrete often has a fines content exceeding 20%, making the material sensitive to moisture. As such, the material may be difficult to use in wet winter months. Placement and Compaction Requirements: Structural fill should be moisture-conditioned to +/- 2% from optimum prior to placement. The material should then be placed in loose horizontal lifts not exceeding a thickness of 6 to 12 inches, depending on the material type, compaction equipment, and number of passes made by the equipment. Structural fill should be compacted to a firm and non-yielding condition, at least 95% of the maximum dry density as determined using the ASTM 0-1557 test procedures, or standard dictated by project specifications. 8 S&EE • • 5.4 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES ON UNDERGROUND WALLS Lateral earth pressures on permanent retaining walls, underground vaults or utility trenches/pits, and resistance to lateral loads may be estimated using the recommended soil parameters presented in the following table. ~,v",,,,:.,·\ ,~-'A. _i!.;;"':·<i-.,~i, <-:~ }Eq~jvalenfFlul~y.l1i~ W~ight (PCF) tz· Passive Structural fill and 45 60 200 native soils Note: Hydrostatic pressures are not included in the above lateral earth pressures. C(j'~mcient of Friction at Base 0.4 The at-rest case applies to unyielding walls, and would be appropriate for walls that are structurally restrained from lateral deflection such as basement walls, utility trenches or pits. The active case applies to walls that are permitted to rotate or translate away from the retained soil by approximately 0.002H to 0.004H, where H is the height of the wall. The passive earth pressure and coefficient of friction include a safety factor of 1.5. SURCHARGE INDUCED LA TERAL LOADS Additional lateral earth pressures will result from surcharge loads from floor slabs or pavements for parking that are located immediately adjacent to the walls. The surcharge-induced lateral earth pressures are uniform over the depth of the wall. Surcharge-induced lateral pressures for the "active" case may be calculated by mUltiplying the applied vertical pressure (in pst) by the active earth pressure coefficient (Ka). The value of Ka may be taken as 0.36. The surcharge-induced lateral pressures for the "at-rest" case are similarly calculated using an at-rest earth pressure coefficient (Ko) of 0.5. 1509rpt 9 S&EE • • 5.5 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 5.5.1 SUBGRADE PREPARATION Apron Expansion to the North and Roadwav Widening: Our boring data show that the majority of the near-surface subsoil in these areas is soft silt that did not receive any consolidated in the past. As such, the soil has a low shear strength, and will require improvement/stabilization prior to the installation of pavement sections. We recommend that the new pavement areas first be stripped of vegetation and topsoil. The subgrade should then be proof-rolled to identify areas of soft, wet, or organic soils. Proof-rolling should be accomplished with a loaded dump truck making systematic passes while being observed by a site inspector from our office. In areas where unstable and/or unsuitable subgrade soils are observed, the subgrade should be over-excavated. We anticipate that over-excavation may range from 12 to 24 inches. After approval by our site inspector, a non-woven geotextile having a minimum 200 pounds grab tensile strength should be installed at the over-excavated subgrade. The geotextile should be placed with 12- inch overlaps and all wrinkles removed. The over-excavation should then be backfilled with 1-114" minus crushed rock. The material should have adequate moisture content (within +/-2% from optimum) at the time of placement. The rock should be placed in lifts, and each lift be compacted to a firm and non-yielding condition, or at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined by the modified Proctor compaction test (ASTM D 1557), or to meet standards dictated by project specifications. Fill Area in the East: The area should first be stripped of vegetation and topsoil. The subgrade then be proof-rolled to identifY areas of soft, wet, or organic soils. At locations that are too narrow for a dump truck, the proof-rolling should be performed with a heavy roller that weight at least 10 tons. In areas where unstable and/or unsuitable subgrade soils are observed, the subgrade should be over-excavated. We anticipate that over-excavation would be less than 12 inches. Non-woven geotextile having a minimum 200 pounds grab tensile strength should be installed at the prepared subgrade. The geotextile should be placed with 12-inch overlaps and all wrinkles removed. Structural fill should then be placed to raise the site grade to design subgrade. The Structural fill materials should meet both the material and compaction requirements presented in Section 5.3.5. 1509rpt 10 S&EE • • 5.5.2 PA VEMENT DESIGN Asphalt pavements constructed over prepared subgrades can be designed with a CBR (California Bearing Ratio) value of 5; concrete pavement can be designed with a subgrade reaction modulus of 50 pci (pounds per cubic inches). Top course and base courses under pavements should consist of well-graded crushed rock conforming to either FAA requirements or WSDOT specifications for Crushed Surfacing, Specification 9-03.9(3). The material should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined by the modified Proctor compaction test (ASTM D 1557) or to meet standards dictated by project specifications. 5.6 SEISMIC CONSlDERA TION AND HAZARD The geotechnical-related parameters to be used for seismic design in accordance with 2012 IBC provisions are evaluated as described in Section 1613.3 of the 2012 IBC Code. The spectral response accelerations for the "Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake" (MCE R) were obtained from the USGS website using a latitude of 47.493 degrees and a longitude of 122.216 degrees. The values for Site Class B (rock) are: Ss = 1.455 g S, = 0.545 g (short period, or 0.2 second spectral response) (long period, or 1.0 second spectral response) The Site Class is selected using the definitions in Chapter 20 of ASCE 7-10 considering the average properties of soils in the upper 100 feet of the soil profile at the site. Using the boring data obtained from current and previous projects, we estimate that the average standard penetration resistance (N) in the upper 100 feet is 7. This value corresponds to Site Class E ("Soft Clay Soil") in Table 20.3-1 (ASCE 7- 10). The site coefficient values, obtained from Section 1613.3.3 of the 2012 IBC, are used to adjust the mapped spectral response acceleration values to get the adjusted spectral response acceleration values for the site. The recommended Site Coefficient values for Site Class E are: F, = 0.9 F, = 2.4 (short period, or 0.2 second spectral response) (1.0 second spectral response) The most recent USGS Earthquake Hazards Map (U.S. Geologic Survey web site, 2008 data) has JS09rpt 11 S&EE • • ,---------------------------------------------------------- indicated that a horizontal peak acceleration (PGA) of 0.61 g is appropriate for a 4275-year return period event, i.e. an event having a 2 percent chance of being exceeded in 50 years. Based on our evaluation, the subsoils below the groundwater table and to a depth of about 100 feet are liquefaction prone during the subduction zone earthquakes. Also, liquefaction can results in ground settlement on the order of 10 to 20 inches. 5.7 ADDITIONAL SERVICES We recommend the following our additional services during the construction ofthe project. I. Monitor underground utility construction. We will observe excavation and recommend re-use of onsite soil for backfill; observe excavation subgrade and provide recommendations regarding subgrade stabilization; observe dewatering and provide recommendations when necessary; observe any potential adverse impacts on nearby structures and provide recommendations regarding mitigation; observe backfill placement and assist contractor to achieve compaction. 2. Monitor footing and mat constructions. We will observe and approve footing and mat subgrade; provide recommendations regarding subgrade stabilization, if necessary. 3. Monitor pavement construction. We will observe proof-rolling and provide recommendations regarding local over-excavation to remove soft, wet or organic soil; observe and approve structural fill material and base course; observe and approve fill placement and assist contractor to achieve compaction. 4. Review contractors' submittals and RFI's. 5. Attendance of construction progress meetings. 6. Preparation and distribution of field reports. 7. Other geotechnical issues deemed necessary. 1509rpt 12 S&EE • • 6.0 CLOSURE The recommendations presented in this report are provided for design purposes and are based on soil conditions disclosed by the available geotechnical boring data. Subsurface information presented herein does not constitute a direct or implied warranty that the soil conditions between exploration locations can be directly interpolated or extrapolated or that subsurface conditions and soil variations different from those disclosed by the explorations will not be revealed. The recommendations outlined in this report are based on the assumption that the development plan is consistent with the description provided in this report. If the development plan is changed or subsurface conditions different from those disclosed by the exploration are observed during construction, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions, and if necessary, reconsider our design recommendations. IS09rpt 13 S&EE • • Revised 03-09 ~------------------------------------------- Washington -Renton North 8th and Park Avenue North, Renton, WA 98055 7-207 Triton Tower • Employee gates • AMS Turnstile gates ----Fence lines o Boeing property o General parking o Restricted parking @) Bus stop e Helistop I .right 20090 The Boeing Company. All rights reserved. ._' i: C., <' . --' -: '~ ,J:;".";; .. > I~ --~ ~c,: ~,BASE" LAYO'UT' ':jsu~E~'!!0~-~L~~R' ;C~B;NA~~~~<~, <,/~~?'~~~'~_'~~~~~~' , " /' , . '-., ./ ,'--" i:2015-08-26 "', ,,,; ;".:"'0" -~:,;:"C" ~£'-' ,,..;,ifu'NewPavementfrom Apron , _'_'';/ //-'", " -T"'.~. --T--.-'-"'" '-'" , >~" -=--'-~ 7"" ~ ... ~ r~.i ~ -," -' -"-=~ ~--' ~, fJ_</--'>s, ---: ---::...:,--,-,--~~ r.,""-/~ ~-'" f '~I. -: -; .'.J-o"; ~ -., .. -~iii A to Compass Road -}~/-. ~ ~ --~".!:!: ::..-Jj.-.::-_ . .c---_.:~:---_""~-:-:-::...:;.:'~~_-__ ,,,,~ __ -: __ t '/"~ ,'" "'o_-,J:to~ ""..;;., --.. ;// ,0 " '~-.-d".-'-'c"~~.-c-•• -:' , ,;;', "t ':; _ ~~' -'" , ' "_"""",,l, ' , ::--, • ~"""" -,_'_ ' " ".::, ~ I \ \,.r-~ __ ~ ~-::<,; -", ''''''" ' ,," ':!!.-·1--, --~",' , 'I l . ~~~~=="--~~ / j \ ':0 ./4'i~~ ,-::~'Y\,~!S -- " I! ---,-"~~,:fi:!~\*'i ~ .1, ~{~:.:.---'''~~,',;;;",:''~" -' ii ~ .-' --< :,'~ , ':, ' • ' .' /(V In,' J IB-6 t'~·" t,: / .' ,'. ~ .' '~'-i IB-7 I' ~ .1', .Ii: i / '/ / " -,'-''----~. ~"~1 t .' i~:~ '1, JL : IAreaofNewAPron 1 ~:/ /'/ , ' ---------"-.,:;. ' C" ?"..;. ,"/ M ,,;'L.-_ /'~ ~-.. .< ___ ' '--'------IT' .-_M_ --1" --'V',: \' ( :~A~':lM'rr' ~ II ;a' ,-, "'--,,' 7 '" i llliv{':'! :.;\, ,',' ,,' -", I .. ,i-i.,", -:""I'-'l'" 1\ B-8 !;~!, ~ Ii: ~ i, "';""" -----', .. , . ~ • <1\ '.~., " ", I ,~, JI lJ..- ,-':,;7'0, ttl r I ,-i I m ,f IU I' i I' I J '" ~d.~ -'~O i ,1 h "j I ;i \ 'I' _ \--",~,--, , (~o:"df rm 'j r III ~-7t;4 [If r ,~ ~I ~Ll=Jll~'~!-I:"" -\-f'\\"'''~'';-.I~I ,-/ , ",jlfHf~' 'n t ,t 1 'f~( ---rTjJ(ri'I,'I-;:t ,I'f--..· ~-,~, _iB-10 "~, ~)-----I ,'~ \'<""'-,~ ,-,,--( ,',' '! III I. '-I ~ .r,--b ,~; lr., ,ft.-/ " \ ,'--, _ ,', ,lllb" \l-f-tl 'I~; -/----1ti -, B,9 --ft-7;-2l'-.L~fl:IT l'I"'-.'aOl"\"" \ ~~'-______ "< ___ --::> I' ''''';'T' r' l. '\ I "'I:~~~'-::;:;?" , .'-!,.,' .1 '!~ ,!,/,,,!-:L ,tiT t ....,w~ ."~\. '--, >. -~-,-==-,-::: , '"'~~' I: i" ", 1\ If.tJ:j~' ~ ,1 ~ 1 'vl'SLJ __ L n'i , 5t I r ,{;: ~'" ,: :'\ /.'j~{ -------:::: I " iL . Ii I' ::i-=-t TJ ... ----J ~~_ . . , '.'1; ,~" -=-I,Ll,H" L, ' I I =; ,t,:",.4~';::P1' , ."~" j, -'; "'8-4 __ J!----'lti' " NIl! II '11, I ~'1l .,1 ilL .. ",,,,, I , I'i! I' I I ~, '~B FE:~XJOER ' , _-.-- '. I~I :, I fHl j!Hl"~1 ~ I, ,~p:U~2Li:1 1... : ' L~' '\/'" -~4FlD,EPTH '-I', __ ---_ , ~ " l..--rr !-r-".iL ',I'f"'i"l'~[i Ii" )':'. I, /t/ If-< I N I II I' <---I. r '''I'; ''__ ' ,_---______ --; I" ~';l' ":1'-" ;R~ l;~7/ :_1'--!' 't± i!l-r: I -' : i, 'N. -i. ----""',--::', ; I~-' \ Ii :' '7 '!',c} -, :'--t ,+_ ,--'-5., ! ' .. : "~ lli' " , JB,3BwlthGroundwater '" , __ --,---,------",' , ""I-Mi' 1 \\~I !!11:IU~lfn;,;;~;' Iii J' _II I ~l i'-I"!~J, .. ~~! ",' '..jMomtonngWell __ --,---,.::.'~::=--_-,'. '. 'LJ II;' \. ,1f-ifii'11 I "I [?il' 1.!.l...J "" --+---+-2 ,-I .. , ,--' _~.=---------J:t"' ~ ~ I t'I il\"'~ ~ <:r ~ I I '", ___ _,r __ .... ,~Y":-:;;-o-",~ 3'C>7_'''''---:-ip-.~I~;-----' .. , I'~ .~--:-~~~'/IO, --,' /,; ... ",:~-:.=--,,---,.-:~",.--- : ",~f~~;'0,::;1;';"c;,=-'.~, '=;';:;T',~~' ~, --".":~,'~:--~{ , ,,~F""~~--bi-~~,"', .' ~ /--,-,>~}.'" --',--", , ,,~' , ' __ -~""'''--P'_.....-:-:---C'---' 0 I'-'~"i -'-" " '--c ,---,' ,,'" '_"'~~"~JW __ ~~ :d.e::::,/"', ~' ~~ -":1P\f---oi( ,_--.J ~ .. :::--'tT'r '---~_ -~~-~ -+ .... -, 'n...~ T"",.~ • -/ IB-3A L--'-~,.-. ~~'-.... _ , J1,~._::""'-:.-' -,:);-,,+-:-, -,-~,I ",",'"~i~'1:--__ ~~-=~-~:¥~'-,::', ':" "'-~:.~:-;k.c'~:~~:: . ..l-i_8 <;;:;'~,' ('~,-==-~,'--::.~~~~~~_--=--::::-:~~'C'~;::-:;::;; -, \ ~" '. ',,---l·~' , , ~' ,1'--~"<~'.!:\ --I. . ----TELEPHONE: -:.A*" ,,-' ~,~ ~----So. ~< +=-( ," ,"';;;::-·ti~.t', ,. "C .. '.'\%.,4, __ ,·,----'·~--·--1RUNK,lINE~';::>i''''~..;,~,-::'--),-,,,i-=-__ C __ ' --~ --;rN _____ + I, ~~ ,J ~-, -'i; ; ~ ~ ~1.i{llB-,1 J-;-'-~_L-t----t--~-~' -, ~;;~--.~ l~9 ",: -" ,~;.::.:::::::.=:_~~-;.~'-r:(, ~fJ _____ • ~""':7:",~' "---'-" ~~ "--T::=£;-':T,j;ji1'~I:~.'ft~c'~,,,-cr, :, .:: :.,.,--=.:jNeW Blast FenCe[, ' 'c ~--=',;,..Y -:,~:,_-----,::.::.., , : ' Figure 2, Site & Exp'oration Plan .,,' ~r ""''i",i''_, "01' __ '~--",l-"tf?" :'; ''';-:':--:--;'-:=Q"11~;''~~I'; ,','," ka"S'" ,:;:::-:",. -~----( /~,,, (Sep-14,2015 Revision) ,e , ,',,---1 ,<,'1-' ~ "P?" ,"" g' r:'E:' .;;c.~~ , I ' ,,-.L-_________ , -~~-\j..-.___=:--~--i= \_,_i~ ~--~').~~,>:'.~,~, _ ~_ ::-~r~-, ¥ ____ /-~./ i,~ ~ . 1.,A'~ ---.~~~--~v".i;;O_L..;_ ----. ,~ 1 I ~ r ---' ._ -~-.-iJ..)i>. -_~_ft,'~_ _ ~~ _, ,. __. • Facility Boundary Former Lake Washington Shoreline ~ Ancestral Black River ~ Ancestral Cedar River c:=J Current Cedar River If./aterway ~ Wetland ~ Forested Uplands '----' Geologic Cross Section (see figure 2-8) o 500 1000 ""iiiiOiii Scale in '"eel ---~-~~~-----"--------- " ' .. , .. " .. " .. " .. ",,,", .. ",,., .. ,,, ~ .. ~" .,~~,,, " '."'~".' ',"","".~ ""'_'M""'~ , _"'" """' .e'. ~" .... ,,"~"" ... ~,.,,~ . ,.,.-..... ' . ,,_. ~.;::~':;;' ~.:':'."'~: ';. ,.","", ., .. -, ... ~ " - • ,-, :,~;r; ::l;",;,:,~~:~.1 .::; ',' " "''' l .. ,.j' ."",,,,"',1i , " '. -/. ll' , "> III "h", ~ "" -,.-\<~L{ • I I --_ ... _-_ ....... ...--. . . _,,_._.-.. , ........... "' .. " .. .. -._.-...... ,...,. ............. "..-.............. ''''''''''' .. ''' .. ,-''''''''' )1 I'RELIMINAII RV LlQ""ACnON SUSCEPT"'LI" M" OF THE ·'r~:u:;~~~:~::,,:~:~:.GTON t 'i "I "'Ii IV --_._--_ ....... ................. _----" ... - """""" ........ < .. ,-,,-"'- C'''''''' • ="; ::'':r.''b,:::''.J'o,:;::l,r::-'" """,""' ..... K ..... JY_ <_ ........ ""' .. ".,, .. ..... """"""-............. ,'_ ... .. ~-... ~-.... -.. --. Figure 4 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LOGS OF BORINGS The subsurface conditions at the project site were explored with the drilling of 10 soil test borings, B-1 to B-IO on September 17 and 18,2015. The test boring was advanced using a truck-mounted drill rig. Boring B-3A encountered an abandoned storm drain at a depth of 9 feet. The boring was moved 2 feet northwest and a new boring, B-3B, was drilled. A representative from S&EE was present throughout the exploration to observe the drilling operations, log subsurface soil conditions, obtain soil samples, and to prepare descriptive geologic logs of the exploration. Soil samples were taken ,at 2.5-and 5-foot intervals in general accordance with ASTM D-1586, "Standard Method for Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils" (104" I.D. sampler). The penetration test involves driving the samplers 18 inches into the ground at the bottom of the borehole with a 140 pounds hammer dropping 30 inches. The numbers of blows needed for the samplers to penetrate each 6 inches are recorded and are presented on the boring logs. The sum of the number of blows required for the second and third 6 inches of penetration is termed "standard penetration resistance" or the "N-value". In cases where 50 blows are insufficient to advance it through a 6 inches interval the penetration after 50 blows is recorded. The blow count provides an indication of the density of the subsoil, and it is used in many empirical geotechnical engineering formulae. The following table provides a general correlation of blow count with density and consistency. DENSITY (GRANULAR SOILS) CONSISTENCY (FINE-GRAINED SOILS) N-value <4 very loose N-value <2 very soft 5-10 loose 3-4 soft 11-30 medium dense 5-8 medium stiff 31-50 dense 9-15 stiff >50 very dense 16-30 very stiff >30 hard After drilling, the test borings were backfilled with bentonite chips and the surface is patched with quick set concrete. The boring logs are included in this appendix. A chart showing the Unified Soil Classification System is included at the end of this appendix. A groundwater monitoring well was installed in Boring B-3B. The well consists of one-inch, slotted PVC pipe from depths of 15 to 5 feet and solid pipe there above. A flush-mount monument was installed on the ground surface. Job No. 1509 S&EE • • ~ c <> .l!! ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ c " i.l: 0 5 ~ " ,-<>c u ~ at: e8 ~ e ~~ ,,::;; e c~ ~8 'c~ ~ ,,0: ~~ ~ "fj"fj sa III .s.s , 13 118 1 12 114 11 , 8 118 • '8 7 , , 3 3 2 , ,18 '. , , s ~ " .l!! ~ co [ IIII IIII ~ ~ tl !g Surface condition: Concrete SP Brown fine to medium sand with fine to medium gravel (medium dense)(fill) SM Gray silty fine to medium sand (medium dense)(fill) Grayish brown silt with organics (medium stiff to very soft) BORING B-1 1 ,18 ~ o 112 1 below 7.5 feet 10 , , o 118 o 116 o 15 20 , 1 118 o 114 2 1 1 ' , ' _____ 1 __ _ Client: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: S&EE Job No. 1509 (Boring log continued on Figure A-1b) The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track·mount drill rig SPT sampler driven by 140·lb auto hammer September 17, 2015 Holocene Drilling • Figure A-1a Proposed Apron A Upgrade • ~ ~ i! ?$c: ." ~ &.'!l c~ oS ~ '" ~c ~8 li} l ,3 ~8 .~~ Cl <tJ ~ e ~ Clet: ~ ~ ~ ~c] :g:g U) ~ 13"5 0 ~ u: <:'-0 ~ m ~ Cl:l; SS U) BORING B-2 Surface condition: Asphalt 0 mEldilJmsand with fine to medium gravel and crushed rock '11 , ,,. 11 '" , , 12 ,,. 5 " 3 , 5 , ,,. '. , , 0 ,18 0 , 16 1 , , 10 , 0 , ,,. 0 '" ,0 ' , 1 ,,. 1 , 14 2 , , 15 , 0 ,18 0 , 17 o , , 1 ,18 1 ,10 1 , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Gray silt and silly fine sand (medium sliff)(fill) Gray silt (very soft) sand lenses al 10 feet debris at 12.5 feet ir'nrs;Mj 'Gri.y silty fine sand and brown silt loose) of peal al 15.5 feel fine to medium sand loose) 20 , , 1 _____ 1 ___ Client: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: S&EE Job No. 1509 (Boring log continued on Figure A-2b) The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT sampler driven by 140-lb auto hammer September 17, 2015 Holocene Drilling • Figure A-2a Proposed Apron A Upgrade • ~ l ., i;} 0 20 25 30 35 40 --------------------------------------------------------- ~ ~ " .'!l ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~~ -!>~ s8 1! e ~ , ~~ o:l; ~ ~ .ll CD 5 • , 2 3 2 " e ~~ ~8 .~~ Oil: ~~ ~~ "fin SS , , ,. , 18 18 '& ., ~ .Q E i;; .'!l '" ~ (J cjj '" ::;, I Gray silt with lenses silty fine sand and peaty silt (very soft) ~'l-~ Gray fine sand and trace coarse sand (very loose) , , ' _____ 1 __ - Client: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: S&EE Boring aborted at a depth of 24 feet on September 17, 2015. Due to wet sand filling the bore hole The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT driven by 140-lb auto hammer September 17, 2015 Holocene Drilling BORING B-2 (Continued) Figure A-2b Job No. 1509 • Proposed Apron A Upgrade • "" ,! £ ~ 0 0 5 10 15 20 ~ .!i ~ ~ ~ tt '¥-, Sepr 21 ' -2015 ~ ~t: u ~ Sc; cO ._ <.l l;! e ~ " ~~ o:l! ~ • ~ <Xl , , " 1? ~~ .~~ 00:: ~~ ~~ 13"5 ..s..s 1 118 o 118 1 1 1 2 , ,18 , 17 I : I I 1 _____ 1 __ _ Client: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: S&EE Job No. 1509 -'1 BORING B-3B £ .8 ~ §, 0 !!! co ~ ~ til ~ Surface condition: Asphalt over concrete over advanced to 7.5 feet to verify there was no storm drain line continue from where 8-3A left off sil1 and silty fine sand soft) tube sample silt with lenses of peaty silt (Boring log continued on Figure A-3Bb) The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT sampler driven by 140-lb auto hammer September 18, 2015 Holocene Drilling • Figure A-38a Proposed Apron A Upgrade • "" ! £ ! 20 25 30 35 40 ~ " ~ c 8 " ~ ~ ~ " ~c: Q.~ ~c ~o .~u c e ~ , ~~ o::!; e c~ i §!8 'C~ 0 ~ 00: .91 ~[g ~ ~ .ll "5"5 cjj Ql .s;.s; . ~ ,18 : g 116 X f- a 18 a " , a ,18 1 '14 4 , , , 1 1 118 o 110 a , ~ , , ~ 0 -"l .ll ~ '" '" u '" :;, ML Brown silt with organics (very soft) MH Gray silt with lenses of silty fine sand (medium stiff) -shelby tube sample -lens of brown peaty silt with wood debris at 30 feet, very soft ,'-1. .1- , 1-__ Boring completed at a depth of 30 feet on September 18, 2015. 80RING 8-38 (Continued) A 1 inch groundwater monitioring well with a flush-mount monument was installed slotted pipe from 5 to 15 feet. Client: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT driven by 140-lb auto hammer September 18, 2015 Holocene Drilling Figure A-3Bb S&EE Proposed Apron A Upgrade Job No. 1509 • • 5 10 15 20 ~ ~ " ,-E~ t:~ .!!/ BORING B-4 " " .8 .!l ~o .~~ g. E § .~ () 0 ~ () ~ ~ ~ 00: .!!! ~~ C/) ~ ~~ mm Q. <I> ~ "5"fi E () It .2 <I> ~ Surface condition: Grass 0:;;; OJ .s-s C/) , , , 1111 8M Brown silty fine to medium sand with organics , , , (top soil) , , , 1111 , , . ~~ , , , 7 II I , 5 ML Gray silt , , (medium stiff)(fill) , , • , . t-, 4 4 IX 4 t- , , , , , , , 2 , ,. ~ , 3 3 , 3 , , , , , ML Gray silt with trace organics , , (very soft to soft) , , , ~ , 0 ,. , 0 ,. , 0 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 0 ,. ~ , , 0 17 , , 0 , , , , , , , Boring completed at a depth of 10 feet on September 18, 2015. Client Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: S&EE Job No. 1509 The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT sampler driven by 140-lb auto hammer September 18, 2015 Holocene Drilling • Figure A-4 Proposed Apron A Upgrade • ~ ~ ~ ;;,.- ~ u ~ o~ S 81: '" ~8 .~~ ! ! § u ~ e ~ Cla:: ~ S ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ! ! ~ ~ 1313 c .Sl it Cl:l! Ol .s.s 0 ; : : 5 : ~~ IX r-, 2 18 ~ 1 9 2 5 , 1 ,18 ~, 1 116 2 ' , , o ,18 ~ o 114 o ' ~ ~ III III u ~ Surface condition: Grass ML Brown sandy silt with organics and trace fine gravel (top soil) ML Gray and brown silt with organics (soft)(fill) ML Gray silt with trace organics (very soft) BORING B-5 10 2 5 6 18 ~ 15 20 15 I 111m lSi> Gray fine to medium sand 1-IFHH:~ (medium dense) I 1 I : 1 _____ 1 __ _ ,-- Bar ng completed at a depth of 10 feet on September 18,2015. Client Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: S&EE Job No. 1509 The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT sampler driven by 140-1b auto hammer September 18, 2015 Holocene Drilling • Figure A-5 Proposed Apron A Upgrade • ~ ~ ~i c ., .l!l ~o l 0 ·_0 0 ~ e 0 ;; ~ ~~ g. ~ u: 0 o::!; 0 , 5 10 15 " ~ .~§ ;; g. 0 ~ 00: .l!l [g~ ~ ~ "5"5 -2 t'l '" .s.s 7 18 1. 11 12 7 16 2 10 3 , ~ 2 ,16 1 '15 2 , , ~ 0 ,16 0 '13 0 1 16 ~ 2 1. 3 '" 0 .Q BORING B-6 §, U) to u to '" Surface condition: Concrete fine to medium sand with fine to medium gravel and little silt I\m"alum dense)(fill) and brown silt with trace organics I \mearum stiff to soft)(probable fill) ML Gray silt with lenses of silty fine sand and trace organics (very soft) of gray fine sand at 11 feet 20 : _____ I __ ~ Client: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: S&EE Job No. 15{)9 Boring completed at a depth of 10 feet on September 18, 2015. The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT sampler driven by 140-Jb auto hammer September 18, 2015 Holocene Drilling • Figure A-6 Proposed Apron A Upgrade • ~ c: "" l!l ~ ~ ~ 5 0 Q. ~ ~ if 0 0 5 ~ ~ ,-""~ a~ ~~ s8 ~ e ~~ 0::' ~~ H ~ 0" ~~ ~ 'fi"5 .!2 III ..s..s , , '12 ,18 '15 ,. : 19 '17 , , I. 12 6 5 , 3 118 2 '5 1 , o 118 o ,9 1 .!!l 5 .8 :;-~ 0 l!l ~ '" u ~ '" :, Surface condition: Asphalt over concrete fine to medium sand with fine to medium gravel (dense)(fill) silty fine sand with little fine gravel i(m"a,um dense) BORING B-7 and brown silt with some sandy silt and trace organics to very soft) 10 1 o 1 I. ~ 14 lWLI_-" 15 20 , I 1 I 1 I __ -'-__ I __ ~ Client: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: S&EE Job No. 1509 , 1 __ _ Boring completed at a depth of 10 feet on September 17, 2015. The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT sampler driven by 140-lb auto hammer September 17, 2015 Holocene Drilling • Figure A-7 Proposed Apron A Upgrade • "" ~ ~ " g. 0 0 5 10 15 20 ~ ~ "-" 2:--"-u 0 ~ -'l 1: ,,~ o~ ;; 0 ~ ~o .~~ g. .Q BORING B-8 0 0 Cl " ~ J: Client: ",0 ._ Cl ~ e ~ ~ 01;; <:;5 o::i; 0 ~ 00: .!l "" ~ ~ ~~ .2 i1f5 tl CQ .ss , , '12 ,18 , 20 '13 : 18 , , , , 20 ,18 , 10 , 0 , 7 4 18 3 4 2 1 18 0 ,12 1 , , , 1 ,18 0 , 18 5 , , , " 4 18 3 ,18 ," , 1 ,18 0 '8 1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 1 _____ 1 ___ I IIII IIII IIII IIII I ~ '" '" Cl '" ::> Surface condition: Concrete fine to medium sand with some fine to medium gravel Ilden"e to medium dense)(fill) Brown silt with little gray sandy silt and trace organics (medium stiff)(probable fill) silly fine to medium sand (very loose) fine to medium sand with trace silt ML silt with brown peaty silt (very soft) (Boring log continued on Figure A-8b) The Boeing Company Drilling Method: Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT sampler driven by 140-lb auto hammer September 17, 2015 Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: Holocene Drilling Figure A-8a S&EE Job No. 1509 Proposed Apron A Upgrade • • --------------------------------- "" j! ~ " g. 0 0 5 10 15 20 "il ~ '-~ .,- " a~ c~ " -"! BORING B-9 0 .!! e8 .~~ ! .Q .3 §, ~ ~ ~ oct: oS! co ~ ~~ ~~ co ~~ ~ ~ ~ "'''' " u: .\l 00 tJl ~ Surface condition: Concrete 0::;; '" .s.s , , Gray fine to coarse sand with little fine to medium gravel '17 ,18 '22 : 15 ,8 (dense to medium dense)(fill) , 8 ,18 • , 10 5 ML Gray silt with silty fine sand (stiff)(probable fill) , ,18 ~ ML Brown and gray silt , 10 (very soft) silt at 6 feet 0 18 ~ 0 18 0 , ~ 0 ,18 0 , ,. 0 3 18 ,~ Gray fine to medium sand with trace silt 3 8 2 (loose) , ~ 2 ,18 3 '13 5 , ~ 2 ,18 1 , 18 1 ML Gray silt with lenses of brown peat (very soft) , , ' __ ~ __ I __ ~ Client: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: S&EE Job No. 1509 (Boring log continued on Figure A-9b) The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT sampler driven by 140-lb auto hammer September 17, 2015 Holocene Drilling • Figure A-9a Proposed Apron A Upgrade • *' <;-~ ~ ~ ,- ""0 .!!1 " :s.~ o~ s .8 BORING B-9 ~ ~o .,. ~8 .~~ g. ,! .3 Cl ! (Continued) o e ~ Cll>: ~ S ~ ~ , :Z~ co ~ ~ ~j ~ I (J 0 .S1 13"5 ~ u: tll oSS 20 ; ~ I ~~ Gray silt with lenses of brown peat IX ML , 1 (soft) f- 25 30 35 40 , I I I I I __ "':"' __ I __ ~ , 1 __ _ Boring completed at a depth of 20 feet on September 17, 2015. Client Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: S&EE Job No. 1509 The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig SPT driven by 140-lb auto hammer September 17, 2015 Holocene Drilling • Figure A-9b Proposed Apron A Upgrade • ~----------------~-~ ., ~ ~ ,s Ii} c 0 5 10 15 20 ~ ~ ;;:"1:: ~ u ~ 81:; ~o i5 '-<.) <.) ~ e ~ w ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ !2 c:l; '" , 13 '19 : 16 , , 21 , 8 • 2 1 1 1 0 , ' 0 , 0 2 4 2 • 7 2 3 4 , ." t:; ,s .~g ! co: .9! ~~ ~~ ~ "§"5 tJl .s.s 18 13 18 0 ,18 ~ ,. , ~ ,18 ". , , ~ ,18 ,15 , 18 ~ , . 18 ~ 14 18 ~ 17 , .£! .8 §. Ul Ul <.) gs ML SM ML Surface condition: Concrete fine to coarse sand with little fine to medium gravel to medium dense)(fiII) Brown silt and silty fine sand (stiff)(probable fill) Brown and gray silt with trace organics (very soft to medium stiff) Gray silty fine sand (medium dense) Gray fine to medium sand with trace silt to very loose) and brown silt with trace organics (very soft) I __ ~ __ I __ ..! (Boring log continued on Figure A-10b) Client: The Boeing Company Drilling Method: Hollow stem auger advanced by track-mount drill rig Sampling Method: SPT sampler driven by 140-lb auto hammer Drilling Date: September 17, 2015 Drilling Contractor: Holocene Drilling BORING B-10 Figure A-10a 5&EE Proposed Apron A Upgrade Job No, 1509 • • "" ~ ~ oS ! 20 25 30 35 40 ~ ~ ." .,-e u ~ -'l <: Q.J!! ~~ oS .& ~~ J!! ~o ~8 ! .3 ~ .~(,) .~~ ~ e ~ co: J!! '" ~ ~ , ~~ t3 ~) ~ ~~ ~ ~ Q 1313 m ~ OJ ss '" ; ~ : ~o Gray and brown silt with trace organics IX ML '4 ' (medium stiff) ,'--- , I , 1 1 1 _____ 1 __ _ , 1 __ _ Client: Drilling Method: Sampling Method: Drilling Date: Drilling Contractor: Boring completed at a depth of 20 feet on September 17, 2015 Ground water measured at 6 feet during drilling The Boeing Company Hollow stem auger advanced by track·mount drill rig SPT driven by 140-lb auto hammer September 17, 2015 Holocene Drilling BORING B-10 (Continued) Figure A-10b S&EE Job No. 1509 • Proposed Apron A Upgrade • ~ ~ DESCRIPTION w ~ ORGANIC CLAYS OF ORGANIC SILTS TO HIGH PLASTICITY, PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Non-disturbed D&M Sampler SPT (1.4" 10 SAMPLER) SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER "l DEPTH OF GROUNDWATER DURING EXPLORATION S&EE MAJOR DIVISIONS CLEAN GRAVELS ~i2...,. w en u..~d CI3§ ~ (LITTLE OR m ~~Z~ ~~ NO FINES) ?( ~d~ ~~ 5 \!2w en $~ GRAVELS I-wet:: (lJa) Cl ~~ WITH FINES 0::: 1i!U)~ii) !t"". C!) o~5 ~~ w ~'" (APPRECIABLE ::i'u i=w ~ !5~ AMOUNT OF FINES) -iO ~ ~g i'5g CLEAN !i''Z C?h SANDS ~f2" ~w W ~~ u..~~ U)~ en ~ (LITTtE OR ~ ~§~~ 55 a:: w w NO FINES) « ~" ~~ fI) Ow o !i~ SANDS z ~~~ ~~ u « I-ww~ WITH FINES (/J wU) ..... (/) \!2O a::~...J >w o i a: (I) (APPRECIABLE iiu ft~ AMOUNT OF FINES) SILTS & CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50 SILTS & CLAYS LlaurD LIMIT GREATER THAN 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART AND KEY TO EXPLORATION LOG APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING The soil sample at the depth of 27.5 feet from Boring B-3B was transported to our sub-contracted laboratory, Materials Testing & Consulting, for consolidation testing of a peaty soil. The soil properties were used in the evaluation of consolidation (long-term) settlement. Job No, 1509 S&EE • • ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Materials Testing & Consulting, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering· Special Inspection· Materials Testing· Environmental Consulting One-Dimensional Consolidation Report Project: Apron - A One-Dimensional Consolidation performed in accordance with ASTM D243SID2435!\-J Project II: 15T003·02 Date Received: 09/21115 Client: Soil & Environmental Engine Sampled By: Client Sample Description Source: 27.5' Depth Date Tested: 09122115 Gray Si[1 with Bro ... ,n Peat Sam )lIeN: T15-0423 Tested By: CL Equipment Used GeoTae Sigma-l Load Frame Sample Parameters Initial Moisture Content, % 107.7% Final Moisture Content % 55.0% Initial Dry Unit Wei 'hi, IbJft 39.0 tmal ury umt Weight, Ibm 67.9 Initial Void Ratio 2.63 Final Void Ratio 1.21 Initial Saturation 92,8% Final Saturation 99.5% These values are calculated from the initial sample parameters, using a specific gravity of2.27. T", 0", Load, psf Strain Ratio Do D," OH1() D, Lx. (min) Sample Ht D,;~~~ge C,,(in 2/s) 1 0.0104 3.24% 0.0104 300 OOi I' ).4354 o. -' 0.018' 1 ~ -' 1 3( ;: >,6239 ;- f---; U. ~ i- f---' '-r- 100 IcalCulatlOns: me follO\ving equation .... 'as used to calculate the values shown in the table above: C" = THLlso2/tsll Where: T == The time factor for 50% consolidation, provided as 0.197 (per ASTM 02435). Hoso'" The length of the drainage path at 50% of primary consolidation (double drainage path) Iso == The time corresponding to 50% of primary consolidation For the void ratio and saturation values, an assumed specific gravity of2.65 was used. All results apply only 10 8Ctuallocauons and matenals lesled, As a mutual p,oteC\lon to chents. the pubhc and ourser-es. all repons are subrrutted as the confidenual property of chents, IIIld authon~auon for pubhcallon of Slaletnen\S, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our report!! is reser-'cd pending our ",nt\c:n appro,-a] Comments: ~ Re\'iewed by: ____________________ __ Corporate -777 Chrysler Drive Burlington, WA 98233 • Phone (360) 755-1990 • Fax (360) 755-1980 Regional Offices: Olympia -360.534.9777 Bellingham -360.647.6111 Silverdale -360.698.6787 Tukwila -206.241 1974 • Visit our website: www.mtc-inc.net • ( Materials Testing & Consulting, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering. Special Inspection • Materials Testing· Environmental Consulting Projef:t: "pron· r. Project N: 151003·02 Client: Soil & Em"ironmental Engineers Source: 27.S' Depth SamllleN: TI 5-0423 SterNo, I 2 3 4 l 6 7 8 rsamp't Preparation o Natural Moisture @lnUrldated IIMI Vertical Stress Vertical Strain (psI) (%) SOD 1.16 1000 3.24 2000 6.62 4000 13.25 8000 23.34 16000 30.68 32000 39.59 64000 46.22 One-Dimensional Consolidation Report Dllte Received: 09121llS Sampled By: Client Dale Tested: 09122/15 Tested By: CL One-Dimensional Consolidation performoo in accordance witb AST~I D24J51D24J!Ii.\. Sample Dncription Gray Silt with Brown Peal t:quipnu,>nt (I~ed GeoTae Sillffia-\ Load Frame rrest Method Used @ Method A 0 Methcd B rOaUl,ntefpfetatlon Procedure o Procedure 1 (Log) ® Procedure 2 (SqRtJ Axial Strain versus Axial Effective Stress I,IMIO IO~ICN. Axial Effective Stress (psI) ,1'1 D. D~ DLua D~ 111l1li H~n ., (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (min) 0,0000 0.0000 0.8896 0.0000 ';', 0.0000 0,0108 0,0110 0,0060 0.8708 0.8836 0.81 ·0.0020 0,0160 0.0180 0,0080 0.8404 0.8628 0.72 0.0090 0,0380 0,0412 0,0251 0.7807 0.8153 1.96 0.0040 0,0520 0,0573 0,0307 0.6900 0.7500 2.79 0.0000 0.0450 0.0500 0,0250 0,6239 0.6650 4.41 0,0020 0.0440 0,0487 0,0253 0.5437 0.5985 6,25 0,0030 0.0360 0.0397 0,0213 0.4888 0.5224 6,25 IflO,INN. '. (in2/sec) N/A 0,00341 0,00364 0,00120 0,00071 0.00035 0.00020 0.00015 All rt;:Sulu applr only to nctuallocatiooo ""d lIIataial. ICStcd AI n mutual prolCCIlOlliO dimll, the public and DW"lchcs. all rq>On. n~ lubllll\!cd Allhc confidcn~.1 property of dlento, and authorization ror pubbcationof '1._11, cOlld",ionI or C~Ir<ICI' from Of regardmH our report. i. ~o:ned p~ Out ,orllletl ""pro,·.1 Comments: Reviewed bY:_-,-~,-__ -==,,-_______________ _ Corporate -777 Chrysler Drive Regional Offices: Olympia -360.534.9777 • • Burlington. WA 98233 • Phone (360) 755-1990 • Fax (360) 755·1980 Bellingham -360.647,6111 Silverdale -360.698.6787 Tukwila -206.241.1974 Visit our website: www.mtc-inc.net • Materials Testing & Consulting, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering· Special Inspection • Materials Testing· Environmental Consulting Project: A~ron - A Project II: IST003-02 Client: Soil & Envimrnnental Engineers Source: 27.S' Depth Samplefil: TlS·0423 r Sample Preparation o Natural MOisture .. - @Inundllte<l One-Dimensional Consolidation Report Date Received: 09121115 One-Dimensional Con~olidll6on performed in accordance with ASTM D2435102435:\1 Sampled By: Client Date Tested: 09nZliS T"ted By: CL Sample Description Gray Sill with Brown Peat t:quipnlent Used GeoTae Sigma-I Load Frame rTest Method Used ® Methcw:I A 0 Method B Axial Strain versus Void Ratio I,IMIII .. -.. -- Axial Effective Stress, (pst) Load, psf Void Ratio r Data Interpretation Procedure o Procedure 1 (Log) ® Procedure 2 (SqRt) 11I.lIlIn These values calculated from the incrc:mentalloadin~ data ItMl,IWIII All ,esull. apply on!~ Lo .cLu.lloc.L;OR. and m.Ler;.l. Le!l1Cd As. muma! prou,dion Lo client',!he public and ounc:1.-es, all ,eports are subminoo as !heeonlidmtial propert~ of doeoLJ. and auLhorl; ... lnln for publlcalion of "'Lemen!s, o;onclusion. e, c~D'acLs from or rcgardlZlS our reports i. rese ... .-cd pcnd"'8 OIl, "linen appro,.1 Comments: Re\'iewed bY: __ ~ ______________________ _ Corporate -777 Chrysler Drive Regional Offices: Olympia -360.534.9777 •• , Burlington, WA 98233 • Phone (360) 755·1990 • Fax (360) 755·1980 Bellingham -360,647.6\11 Silverdale -360,698,6787 Tukwila -206.241, 1974 Visit our website: www.mtc-inc.net • • RENTON, WA APRON A IMPINGEMENT STUDY PROJECT # W3441886 DECEMEBER 1, 2015 Prepared by £ CASNE ENGINEERING, INC. Electrical and Technology Consultants E 10604 N.E. 38th Place. Suite 205. Kirkland. WA 98033 RECEIVFD JAN 1 4 2016 IE:!ASNE ENGINEERIN8! INC. Electrical and Technology Consultants LIGHTING STUDY The Boeing Company (Boeing) proposes to install (1) new crew shelter and (3) new light stands on the Boeing flight line in Renton, Washington and within the 200' shoreline boundary. The project site includes Apron A, located on the west bank of the Lower Cedar River (LCR). The proposed project consists of providing the following lighting elements: • Install light-emitting diode (LED) lamps at each entrance of the Apron A crew shelters, (Appendix A) and; • Install high-pressure sodium floodlights on light stands at the east side of Apron A (Appendix B) The City of Renton expressed concerns regarding potential light impingement on the adjacent LCR resulting from the installation of these new fixtures on the Apron A flight line. The focus of this study is to assess potential habitat alteration to the LCR and its associated riparian habitat due to the proposed installation of HPS lighting on the Apron. Boeing's proposed lighting installation is being conducted to meet NEC code requirements for exterior lighting. The proposed plan will install 5-10 HPS floodlights on each offive light stands to use as stall lighting, three of which will be within the 200' shoreline boundary. The two stands closest to the river will support 5 fixtures installed on 17' poles on concrete bases and the third set will feature 10 fixtures at a height of 20' installed atop the super cabana. All light stand fixtures will have full cut-off: of a group of five fixtures, three use type A optics and two use type B optics. All proposed stall lighting will use 480V, 467W fixtures that produce 5000 lumens each. The proposed lighting plan for the 24' x 50' crew shelter will install six total 7 LED, 120-volt, 16.6-watt, amber-hued LED wall pack fixtures above each entrance at approximately 8' above grade. The proposed fixtures (580 nanometer wavelength) will have a full cut-off, Type 3, distribution with ambient diffuser, and rated output of 268 lumens per fixture. To reduce light illumination on the LCR, the fixtures closest to the river will be aimed directly towards the apron. The third and stand will feature floodlights shining parallel to the river, but will be far enough away to avoid illuminating the shoreline. The cut-off, distribution type, and optics will also assist in keeping errant light off of the river. The area between the new lighting and the water includes foliage, buildings, and fencing, all of which will assist in preventing light from impinging on the LCR. The current lighting conditions have been field verified (Appendix C), and a simulated lighting model created to reflect the existing conditions (Appendix D). These samples were cOllected on the evening of November 9th between 7:30 PM and 8:30 PM; sky conditions were partly cloudy with no visible moon present, and a temperature of 46°F. Readings were taken as close as 'Ei ~CASNE ENGINEERI,,", INC. Electrical and Technology Consultants possible to the shoreline. These numbers were used to create an accurate model of the existing conditions, which was then compared to a model including the new lighting. (Appendix E) The model of existing conditions shows a range of 0.1-0.5 fc on the west bank of the LCR. A lighting stand and 40' light pole are the primary contributors to these numbers, both of which will be removed or relocated in the new design. With the light stands added, the calculated range along the shoreline showed a trivial increase, with a maximum of 0.6 fc. Based on these calculations, the addition of light within the 200' boundary of the shoreline will not have a negative impact on the wildlife in the LCR. - I ~ASNE ENGINEERIN' INC. f!i, Bectrical and Technology Consultants APPENDIX A - EXTERIOR BUILDING FIXTURE CUTSHEET I LNC SERIES SPECIFICATIONS Intended Use: Cau Job The compact LED LNC is designed for entry/pe- rimeter illumination for safety, security and identity. Typical mounting height is up to 12 feet with 40ft fixture spacing (w~hout acrylic diffuser) and 30ft spacing with acrylic diffuser installed. Photocontrol option Is available to provide dusk-la-dawn control for additional energy savings. Construction: Decorative die-cast aluminum housing and door. Rugged design protects internal components and provides excellent thermal management for long life -60,000 hours minimum LED life at L96 rating per IESNA TM-21-11. Powder paint finishes provide lasting appearance in outdoor environments. OpticsIElectrlcal LfO: Drivers are 120-277V, 50/60HzType II, III and Type IV lenses provide wide lateral spread, 0-10V dimming 120·2TN only. • LNC5L - 5 LEOs, 12.9w, .11 amp max, 980 lumens. Type II, 111 or rv • LNC7L - 7 LEOs, 16.6w, .14 amp max, 1441 lumens, Type II, til or rv • LNC9L - 9 LEOs, 22w, .18 amp max, 1806 lumens, Type II, III or N • 3000K -80 CRI, 4000K -70 CRI, and 5000K- 67 CRI, CCT nominal • Minimum operating temperature is -40'c/-40'F • Drivers have greater than .90 power factor and less than 20% Total Harmonic Distortion Type Lenses: Full cut-off distribution; Ambient diffuser included, use for applications near enterances or locations where reduced brightness is desired. Installation: Quick mount adapter provides quick installation, designed for recessed box 4" square junction box, Listings: listed and labeled to UL 1598 for wet locations, 25" C ambient environments, Some models meet OesignLights Consortium (Ole) Qualifications, consult OLe webs~e for more details: httD·Uwww desjgnllghts.org/QPL • IES Progress Award Winner -2012 Warranty: Five year limited warranty (for more information visit: http'UwwwhubbelloutdQorcom/resources{ ~ CERTlFICATIONSlLISTlNGS . iii Iii. .. Ir.r-\ f.glitliig ~ ~ ~ facts c us L~_" __ OROERING INFORMATION ORDERING EXAMPLE: LNC-9LU-5K-3-1-PCl Approvals "'HUBBELL Outdoor Lighting PROOUCT IMAGE(S) LNC-5L LNC-9L A 4.81" (122 mm) B 1.55" (39mm) With diffuser C 8.22" (209 mm) o 5.25" (133 mm) -D -D-----LNC LNC 5LU 5 LEOs, Universal voltage 120-277V zero uplight 7LU 7 lEOs, Universal voltage 120-277V 9L1P 9 LEOs, Universal voltage 120-277V 1 When PC is ordered, input must match PC voltage 2 Amber LEOs only available on 7LU and 9LU configurations, 350 rnA only 3 DesignLights Consortium (OLe) Qualified 51719 models 4K and SK only 3K 3000K nominal. IOCRI 41<' 4000K nominal, 70 CRI 51<' 5000K nominal AM' ""ber (500 ~ available for "TurUefriernl~"1 observatory appli- ca1iols, 350 rnA (consu' facIcry) 2 Type" 3' Type III 4' Type IV 1 Bronze 2 Black 3 Gray 4 White 5 Platinum OPTIONS PC(X)' Button photocontrol. replace X with vortage, specify 1-120V, 2-208V, 3-240V,4-277V Hubbell Outdoor lighting. 701 Millennium Boulevard. Greenville, SC 29607 • Phone: 864-678-1000 Due 10 our continued efforts to improve our products, product specifications are SUbject to change without notice, C 2015 HUBBELL OUTDOOR LIGHTING, All RighI:! Reserved. For more ImC(maticrl ~1s~ our woosne: www.OObbellotrtdoor.cam • Pmted in USA lARfDOUIC-SPEC IItI • • REPLACEMENT PART PHOTOMETRICS LNC9LU -Type II LNC9LU -Type III LNC9LU -Type IV PERFORMANCE OATA 5 STD. r-;~~~±~~ 7 (700mA) I 16.6W 9 22W Lumen values arB from photometric tests performed In accordance wHh IESNA LM-79-08. Data Is considered to be representative of the configurations shown. Actual performance may differ as a resuM 01 end-user environment and IIppllca~on. Please consult IES Illes lor BUG ratings. PROJECTED LUMEN MAINTENANCE 1. Projected per IESNA TM·21-11 • (Nlctlja 2198, 700mA, 85"C 15, 10,OOOhrs) Data relerences the extrapolated perfonnal1Ce projecUons for lila lNC-12LU·5K base mOdel 10 a 40·C ambient, based on IO.OOO hours oILED lestlng per IESNA LM·80-0S. ELECTRICAL DATA 7 STO. (700mA) 9 STD. (700mA) LUMINAJRE AMBIENT TEMPERATURE FACTOR (LATf] AMBIENT TEMPERATURE LUMEN MULTIPLIER O'C 3tF 1.02 1O'C 50'F 1.01 20' C 68'F 1.00 2S'C 7TF 1.00 30'C 86'F 1.00 40-C 104'F 0.99 SO-C 122' F 0.98 Use !!lese factors to detennlne retalNe lUmen outpullOf average ambient temperatures from o-so·e (32-122°F). • Hubbell Outdoor lighting. 701 Millennium Boulevard. Greenville, SC 29607· Phone: 864-678-1000 'itfrt-tl :::~~~~~I;hto'ng Due to our continued efforts to Improve our products, product specifications are subject to change without nollce. C 2015 HJBBHL OUTDOOR LIGHTING, AU RIgIts Reserved. For mae Intamatiln vlsllOJ websIUt. www.hubbe!loutdoor.com.PrInted n USA UlC-SPf:C 1/115 ,--------------------------------·l p:~CASNE ENGINEERI"', INC. Electrical and Technology Consultants APPENDIX B- LIGHT STAND FIXTURE CUTSHEETS AF1000 Series • • Aktra Cutoff Floodlight. 400-1000W HID Type: Job: Catalog Number: AFS-400 A 480 Series/Source-Wattage Optics Voltage (include M prer", to de~ignate (Reflector) Marine listed 'erie,) Overall Dimensions For Reference Only Side View 14.5" {36.B3cml '+---80"---.' : lal.32cml : .j .. -~ 4.5"lll.43cml .L ..... Top View .... "''--2·3/8" 0.0. Vertical Pipe Tenon by others 17.4" ~.r" .. 21'mr L ....... ~ ~ Less Ballast version with MF-1 mastfitter N%vailable withMAF marine noodlight Weight nls 2·38" 0.0. vertical pipe lenon by olhers 90 Ibs {40.82 kgs) EPA data shown on page 3. © 2014 Koninklijke Philips N.V. All rights reserved. G20D-117 06/14 page 1 of 6 www.philips.com/luminaires FF2 Options (Factory Im.talled) Specifications Housing TOB Finish PX-1 Accessories (Field Installed) Approvals: Date: Page 1 of 6 /lIu#Wfj Permanent mold aluminum alloy with integrally cast heat dissipating fins. Marine unrt. housing is specially constructed wrth copper content less than 0.4% for corrosion control in harsh coastal and industrial environments. Dust-Tite housing shall be totally sealed from particulate entry. Standard unit constructed to IP6S. MAF Series, Marine Listing. constructed to IP66. Optics (Reflector) High purity anodized renectors assure maximum efficiency. A secondary internal reflector element reflects high angle rays back into the beam to achieve high beam utilization. Meets IES definition of Cutoff distribution. Lamp Access A gasketed and removable socket assembly pmvides convenient lamp access opposite the pre-wired base socket. lens 7/32" glass, tempered to withstand thermal and physical shock. is held by an extruded aluminum frame and sealed to the housing flange by an extruded gasket and stainless steel screws to provide a sealed optical assembly. Socket Grip·type mogul base socket is pre-wired. Glass end of lamp is held in precise photometric alignment and protected from breakage by a Stabilux socket. Ballast SilentGuard high power factor ballast designed for ·4QoC (.4QoF) starting temperature High Pressure Sodium, ·34°C (-30°F) for Pulse Start Metal Halide. I BO°C (356°F) Class H insulation system. Crest factor does not exceed 1.8. Core and coil are encapsulated in a polyester resin compound with the capacitor located outside the encapsulation for ease of maintenance. Ballast components are enclosed in a drawn aluminum container. The fixture and ballast are arranged as separate but integral components. Mounting Cast aluminum ballast base provides integral mastfitter, suitable for mounting to a 2·3/B" 0.0. vertical tenon. less Ballast version requires MF· I Mastfrtter mounting option. Finish Standard finish shall be corrosion-resistant textured dark bronze UltraCiad polyester powder coating. 2.5 mil nominal thickness, electrostaticalty applied and oven cured. All components shall be thoroughly cleaned by a 5 stage pre·treatment process including iron phosphate bath and non· chromic acid etching stages, ensuring optimum performance characteristics. Other colors may be specified. Optional marine grade finish available. Listings ETUcETL listed to the UL 1598 standard, suitable for wet locations, UL I 59BA Marine listing available. The quality systems orthis facility have been Registered by UL to the ISO 9000 Series Standards. Warranty Gardco luminaires feature a 5 year limited warranty. See Warranty Information on www. sitelighting.com for complete details and exclusions. Polycarbonate lenses carry a I year warranty only. 5-ome luminaires use fiuorescent or high imensity discharge (HID) lamps that contain ,mall amounts of mercury. Such lamps are labeled 'Contain Mercury' and/or With the symbol 'Hg·. Lamps that contain mercury mU$t be disposed of in accordance with local requirements. Information regarding lamp recycle and disposal can be found at www.lamprecycle.org. PHILIPS 0. GARDCO . AF1 000 Series • Aktra Cutoff Floodlight, 400-1000W HID Type: I Job: unn shown II representative of MAf .eriel v.1th optional marine !sling and standard AFS-l000 unit optional Marine Listing Man'neType UL 1598A Floodlight I OM 1M prenx along with series/source-wattage designates marine listed luminalre} Series/SOUrce-Wattage 1 Pulse Start Metal Halide o AFP-1000 7,3 High Pressure Sodium ~ AFS-400' o AFS-1000 s , • Page 2 of 6 Optics {ReHee/or} Voltage 0 A 0 120 0 C 0 208 0 240 0 277 0 347 ~ 480 0 QV' Options (Factory Installed) Finish Accessories (Ordered Separately) 0 BL' Bi-level dimming 0 !L' Tn-Level dimming 0 CSR Hot Quartz Restrike 0 LQ HoI/Cold Quartz Restrike 0 LQ1 Separately Wired (120V) Quartz Restrike 0 F-Fl 9 Single Fuse 1120/277V) IZl F-F2 9 Double fuse l200n40/4S0V) 0 Mf·l 1O less ballost o'v\ostfitter mount 0 IG Tefton bonded to gloss lens 0 50HZ 50 Hz ballost operation 0 EPXY-CID-GR Gray Epoxy coated 0 EPXY -CID-WHI White Epoxy coated I) Additional Manne Grade gas~eting. specially constructed with low copper content alloy (less ~ lOB Textured Dart Bronze 0 IGR Textured Gray 0 IBK Textured Bbel< 0 TWHI Textured White 0 ISA Textured Satin Aluminum 0 IGN Textured Green o M(F) Morine grade paint, F = speciFy color Recommended for coastal applicalions. Consult factory lor color availabi~ty. Finish is applied in a three-step process to pass 150.) hours wilh scribe sail spray test per ASTM B 117. 5% solution. 4) Mogul Base EI8lamp (Clear) provided by others. 5) Mogul Base E25lamp (Clear) provided by others. 6) In lOOOW HP$ units. the standard SO cord from ballast to optic head is replaced with nex conduit. The M2 option (less ballast mastntler mount) is nol available. (F) = specify finish color o F-Fl-K1I-(F)' Single Fuse Kit (I ZJn77/347V) o F-F2-K1I-(F)' Double Fuse Kit 1208/240/48OV) o PCM-1-(F) Photocell mounting brocket o WB-1-(F) o WB-5-(F) o FB-1-(F) ~ PX-1-(F) o AL-IO-AF o PM-1 o PM-2 o PM-3 o PM-4 Woll brocket for mounting to ftot vertical surface Wiring box tor WB-l Flat bose mount Cross Arm bracket with 2-3/8" pipe stub Auxiliary polymer lens Wood pole mounting kit for single fixture with one U-arm Wood pole mounting kit for two fixtures with two U-arms Wood pole mounting kit for three fixtures with three U-arms Wood pole mounting kit for four fixtures with four U-arms 8) Dimming oplions available lor HPS vnlts in any aiming posllion. Consvlt factory for availability of dimming wl1h pulse start metal halide vnits. 9) Fvslng is not available on MAF series (marine listed) vnits. Voltage must be specined, than 0,4%) for corrosion control in horsh coastal and Industrial environments or wherever manne type units are requred. Meets U.S. Coast Guard specifications for marine type applicalions. 2) Mogul Base EP39 T25 (ClearJ lomp provided by others. 3J Position oriented soc~et aiming angle limited to between 48" and 78". 7) Quad voltage ballast. Allows Oeld selection 01 1'lJ/208f240f277 voltage, Certain options may require voltage selection as well. 10) Not available lor MAF (marine listed) senes or standard l000W HPS vnll. @2014 Koninklijke Philips N.Y. All rights reserved. G200-117 06/1 .. page 2 of 6 www.philips.com/luminaires AF1000 Series • • Aktra Cutoff Floodlight, 400-1000W HID Type: I Job: Page 3 of 6 Distribution Guide & BaJiast Data Source Catalog Reftector Lamp Field Angle Beam Angle .Ies Ballast ANSI Line Current Une Type Number Type Envelope Based on 10% Based on 50% FileName Type Code 120/208/240/277/480 Walls PSMH AFp·lOOQ A T25 130H x 69V 48Hx 130V afplOOa.ies CWA M141 9.2/5.6/4.7/4.1/2.4 1080 AFP-1OOO C 140H x 99V lOOH x 49V afpl00c.ies HPS AFS-400 A E1B 130H x 69V 48H x lSV afs40o.ies CWA 551 4.1/2.5/2.1/1.9/1.1 467 AFS-400 C 130Hx86V 87H x 42V afs40c.ies AFS-1OOO A E25 123H x 39V 71 H x 6V afs100a.ies CWA 552 9.5/5.5/4.8/4.2/2.5 1100 AF£.l000 C 127H x 62V 78H x 33V afslOOc,ies Di'itribution Pattems AFP·1000·A OMH lMH 2MH 3MH AFS-1000·A OMH 1IAH 2MI1 3MH AFP·1000-C OMli 1 M,I 2MH 3MH 0", OMI, '"' '"' 2MH 'M' '"' .. 25 L ____ L--'--__ --"' 4MH '"' EPA Effective Projected Area in Ft2 Standard unit 2.0 Less ballast unit 1,5 @201-4 Koninklijke Philips N.V. All rights reserved. G200·117 06114 page 3 of 6 www.philips.comlluminaires 'AF1000 Series • Aktra Cutoff Floodlight, 400-1000W HID Type: I Job: Option details (Factory Installed) BL TL Bi-Leve/ Tn.Level switching ballost {consult foctoryJ Note: Dimming is suitable for HPS in any aiming position. Consult foctory when specifying dimming with Pulse Start Metal Halide. Bi-Level provides high/low level of lamp output with up to 50% power consumption. Zero crossover network avoids strobing and lamp dropout. Tr;"Level option provides high I mid I low dimming. Auxiliary I Emergency Ughtlng (' 50 watt quartz lamp. standard) Combined quartz wottage may not exceed HID lomp wattage. J 20V double contoct bayonet base. CSR Hot Quartz Restrike using Current Sensing Relay (without time delay) • Page 4 016 Extinguishes auxiliary quartz lamp when arc of the main HID lamp strikes. Normal Start: HtD lamp _.aeh •• FvI &IIgtdneu: LQ LQl '-c:lfvatlcn: At (initiol) Cold Start or Re~lrike (alter 0 momentary "Browrl Out" or exlended "Block Out" power interruption). through Run Down. UteMatic Hot / Cold Quartz Restrike Provides liteMatic quartz auxiliary operation for fixtures with J 20V or multi-top balJasts. J 20V auxiliary LiteMatic quartz lamp power supplied by boUost lAC line voltage). Quartz lamp remains on for three minutes after main HID lamp strikes and reaches approximately 40% light output. Activation: At !initial) Cold Start or Restrike {after a momentary "Brown Out" or extended "Slack Out" power interruption). through Run Down. Restrike and Ramp Up Separately Wired (! 20V) Hot / Cold Quartz Restrike Externally controlled emergency lighting from a separate power source. Quartz lamp is extinguished once power is restored. To eflSl,A'"e integity of the emergency lighting system, LO 1 leods shOUld be hardwired. Activation: At "Blacl: Out" conditions only. Normal HID operation will occur at all other times Quartz lamp .:mergiled un~1 main HID lamp ,In'kes. Auxmary quartz lamp automoticallv exflnguimed when main HID lo~ strikes, 11akes approximotely 3 minutes to reach opprox_ 4O'X. brighlne!05~ LQ Auxiliary LlteMatlc Quartz Operation NormClI SIClrt: Quartz lamp ene<i1zed at initial cotd ItOri or at re.trike after a temporary power interruption. Quah l .... p RemCltn. on du~ng lamp IJp: !!esides providing illumination whi" the main HID lamp reaches luI brighfne50. Ihe warmth provided by the quartz lamp helps to create a IClllOIobie rlMhik" condition fOilhe main HID lamp luo;elul in ex!reme cold lemperoiUle.j. LQl Emergency Quartz Operation AIAC Powellnterruptlon: During AC line voltage power Interruptkln. auxiliary quorlz Ia""" is automaticaly energized by leporately wired power source. 'I '6 '6 One. POWei II R .. lored. Quarlll .... p AulomClllcally ExHnqutshu Used .pecifical/v 101 emergency lighflng during "Black OJ!" pe!iads. Of limes of extended pOW .... interruption. [Tol:es approximately 3 minute. for KID lamp to reach full brightne50,1 la I requires an interlock by others to ensure HID and quarlz source are not operated together. Sallast fusing Voltage must be specified. Not available lor MAF (marine listed) series. F·Fl F·F2 Single Fuse, 120/ 277V Double Fuse, 208 /240/ 480V Fuses ore KTK/KLK 30 amp unless otherwise specified. Mastfltter for remote mount ballast) Not available for MAF (marine listed) series or standard J OOOW HPS unit. MF·l Less ballast mastfitter mount © 2014 Koninklijke Philips N.V. AU rights reserved .... G200-117 06/1-4 page 4 of 6 www.philips.comlJuminaires Less ballast (remote ballast) option with MF-J masffitter for 2-3/8" 0.0. vertical pipe tenon. (Requires a verticol tenon height of 4·5/8" minimum) r'[jl; 7.13" 118,09cml I ..... 3/8" 1 Sot _ ____ Screw factory installed MF-J masffitter AF1000 Series • • Aktra Cutoff Floodlight, 400-1000W HID Type: I Job: Page 5 of 6 TG 5 MIL Teflon® bonded to standard glass lens. 50HZ 50 Hz ballast operation EXPY -CTO-GR Gray epoxy coated EXPY -CTO-WHT White epoxy coated M(F) Morine grade point Recommended for coastal applications. Accessory details (Field Installed -Shipped Separately) F-FI KIT-(F) F-F2 KIT-(F) PCM-I-(F) WB-I-(F) WB-5-(F) FB-I-(F) Single fuse kit (J20V/277V) Double fuse kit 120BV/240V/480V) Photocell receptacle mounting bracket Vertical wall mount Wiring box for W8-J Flat bose mount © 201<1 Koninklijke Philips N.V. All rights reserved. G200·117 06/H page 5 of 6 www.philips.com/luminaires Specified for applications outside the United Slates where 50 Hz operation is standard, Consult foctory. Durable cooting offers protection against mildly acidic Of alkaline conditions. Consult factory. Consult factory for color availability. (F) = Specify finish fuses ore field installed on wiring access plate. Fusing is not available with MAF series (marine listed) units. Brocket with standard twist-lock receptacle far models with Integral ballasts. Threads into 1/2" NPT hole in bal/ast base or mosffitter. (photocell not included.) Cast aluminum wall brocket for vertical surfaces only. Designed to permit mounting of floodlights on tlot vertical surfaces. Use in conjunction with WB·5 for surface mounted wiring. Used in conjunction with W8-1 fo(surface mounted wiring, Topped top, bock and bottom for 3/4" conduit or pipe. Gasket provided for seafJng surface wiring box to Yv'B-l, vertical watl moun ling bracket. Cast aluminum mounting bracket for installing floodlights on flat surfaces. For use with 2·3/8" D.O. pipe tenon (byothers). Umil height to 8.0" (20.32cm). 9/16" Dio. Hoe (4 Places Typical) I, 5 63,,·J-!\~ -- (U,29cm)], : ~ square--l···-~~" 3/4" NPT (Top. Bottom and Sack) , , , , , , L ___ jQ ~.~J-.~~ '. .. ~: . , , .,. -~ , , 2·3/8" Pipe Tenon IS~ useable 'ength) -r--------:i-~c Wifing Inspection Plate 6.88" (17,46cm) square . L .... _ .... U ... ""Ii':.: .. ...--3.2S" Deep ,or! ! (e,25cml A I I • ~ ,'-. Ji~~.'o 0,5"II.27cm) Dio {J Places Typicall ,--------,--------------------------------------------------- -AF1 000 Series • • Aktra Cutoff Floodlight, 400-1000W HID Type: PX-l-(FJ AL-lO-AF Job: Cross~arm brocket 2-3/8" 0,0. Pipe Tenon P:;=£?>- 9/16" Doc. Hoe (5 PI. Typj Auxiliary polymer lens Cost aluminum angle brock.et with 2" pipe stub. For instolling Oood/ighls on wooden Of steel cross-arms. ttL" base. AuxiliO/y lens for Aldro series fioodlights. J /4" thick impact-resistont polymer lens, furnished with mounting hardware cnd standoffs. Proyides additional protection of Ihe glass lens. Useful life is limited by UV discoloration from sunlight. mercury or metal holide lamps. Notes Wood pole mounting Idts ore suitable for mounting up to four luminaires with masffitters to 6.0"·12.0" 0.0. wood poles. Shipped as components for field assembly. PM-l PM-2 PM-3 PM-4 Wood pole mounting kit for Single luminaire. with I U-arm 'hipping weight: 6 tb, (2.7 kg,) Wood pole mounting kit for two luminaires. with 2 U-arms shipping weight: 91bs (4.05 kgs) Wood pole mounting kit for three luminaires. with 3 U-arms shipping weight: '2 Ibs (SA kgs) Wood pole mounting kit for four luminaires. with 4 U-arms shipping weight: JSlbs (6.8 kgs) rq PM-l I PM-2 PM-J PM-4 2·3/8" 0.0. tenon (typical) @201-4 Koninklijke Philips N.V. All rights reserved. Philips reserves the right to make changes in specifications andlor to discontinue any product at any time without notice or obligation and will not be liable for any consequences resulting from the use of this publication. G200-117 06114 page 6 of 6 www.philips.comlluminaires Philips lighting North America Corporation 200 Franklin Square Drive Somerset. NJ 08873 Tel. BS5·-486-2216 Page 6 of 6 Imported by: Philips lighting. A division of Philips Electronics Ltd. 2B1 Hillmount Rd. Markham, ON. Canada L6C 2S3 Tel. 800-668·9008 F Series (available MF seri'Marine Listed with optional hazardous 10C_ listing) Industrial Floodlight -250-1500 watt HID Type: I Job: Approvals: Catalog Number: PX-1 FS-400 B 480 . FF2 TOB -=--,-::---:-:-:---~-,---;-;-;--------,:-c-------=-:-:--'----:---,-----j Date: Series/Source· Wattage Optics Voltage Options Finish Accessories (Indude M prer,,, to designah: (Renee tor I (Factory Installed) (Field Installed) Page 1 of 6 Marine Listed series) Dj\tributio~) Overall Dimensions For Reference Only : ~.----A---~., ~.---B ---.,: A-80'~ : j20,j2cm); :_F_: ' t .... f!": ='-,: I··-·;~t~" i'i (26.67cm) t--~;viu~~ /~'~r---WIr7:ll,,""'~ t ~ (6.Q3cml ~ I..,.( Verticol Pipe Tenon Side View (byolt'er!1 I) With cerUin dimming options, heiiht of ba~ast container increases to 14.5" (36.83 em). Weight: 66 Ibs (29.9 kg) 400W,ut (max) and 1000W PS unit· 2]" housing Note: 23" housing is standard forF series IOOOW PS units with BT37 lamp for best lamp stability. 26" housing is requited on MF series I000W PS units with HAl option (hazardous location Nsted). A 25.5" (64.77cml B 23.0" (58.42cml C 7.3" (IB.42cml 1 000-1 500 Watt • 26" housing o 13.8" (34.93cml E F 9.5" 10.0" (2'. i 30ml (25.0i0cml Exception: Standard F series lOOOW PS unit with BT37lamp requires 23" housing for socket stability. See note abo .... e. A B c 27.5" 26.0" 9.3" (69.85cml (66.04cml (23.5Ocml o IB.O" !45.72cm) E F 13.3" 11.5" !33.66cm) (29.21cm) EPA data shown on page 3. e 2013 KomnkUlke Philips Electromcs N.V. All rights reserved. Specifications are subject to change without notice. www.philips.com/luminaires G200·116/061-4 Specifications Iii_Hit) Housing Die-cast aluminum housing shall be of marine'grade alloy with integrally cast. heat dissipating nns and a built·in aiming device. oust-Tite housing shall be totally sealed from particulate entry. Standard unit constructed to IP65. MF Series, with Marine Listing. constr'ucted to IP66. Optical Assembly High purity, 94% minimum renectivity anodized aluminum renectors. assembled without machine forming to assure maximum efficiency. Lamp Access A gasketed and removable socket assembly provides lamp access from below. Allows re-Iamping without n~-aiming. High temperature gasket provides positive, weatherproof seal. Lens Lens shall be 7/32" clear tempered glass to withstand thermal and physical shock, held in place by an aluminum (extruded: 400W, die·cast 100011 SOOW) lens frame and sealed to hou!.ing flange by one extruded, high temperature gasket and stainless steel screws to provide a sealed optical assembly. Socket Pre·wired grip-type mogul base socket Glass end of the lamp is held in precise photometric alignment and protected from br-eakage by a Stabilux socket Ballast SilentGuard high power factor ballast with reliable starting down to _29°C (-20°F) for Metal Halide, -34°C (-30°F) for Pulse Start Metal Halide, and -40°C (·40°F) for High Pressure Sodium. Ballast has Class H, I BO°C (356°F) rated insulation. Crest factor does not exceed 1.8. Core and coil are encapsulated in a po~ester resin compound (standard SilentGuard feature) with the capacitor located outside the encapsulation for ease of maintenance. Ballast components are enclosed in a drawn aluminum container: The fixture and ballast are arranged as separate but integral components. Mounting Standard cast aluminum ballast base provides integral mastfitter; suitable for mounting to a 2-3/8" 00. vertical tenon. Alternate mounting accessories available. Finish Standard finish shall be textured gray UltraCiad polyester powder coating. 2.5 mil nominal thickness. electrostatically applied and oven cured. All components shall be thoroughly cleaned by a 5 stage pr'e-treatment process including iron phosphate bath and non·chmmic acid etching stages, ensuring optimum performance characteristics. Other colors may be specified. Listings Standard unit is ETUcETL listed to the UL 1598 standard, suitable for Wet Locations. Available ETUcETL listed to the UL 1598A standard -Marine Listing option (MF Series). Available ETUcETL listed to the Ul 844 standard -Hazardous location listing available 'In the uS (HAZ option for MF Series only, not available in Canada). The quality systems of this facility have been registered by UL to the ISO 900 I Series Standards. Warranty 7 Year Limited Warranty Some IlJminaires IJse fluorescent or high imensity discharge (HID) lamps that contain small amOlJnts of merClJry. Such lamps are labeled 'Contain MerclJry' and/orwlth the symbol 'Hg'. Lamps that contain merclJry mlJst be disposed of 011 accordance with local requirements. Information regarding lamp recycle and disposal can be found at www.lamprecyde.org PHILIPS 0, GARDCO -F Series (available MF Series: .ne Listed with optional hazardous locationtng) Industrial Floodlight -250-1500 watt HID Type: I Job: SerieS/Source-Wattage Optics (Reflector/Distribution) 5 Options (Factory Installed) Ll M MarineTypeUL 1598AFIoodlight 1 Metal Halide 2 o FM·1000 o FM·1500 Pulse Start Metal Halide 3 o Fp-250 o Fp-350 o Fp-400 Ll FP·' 000 Standard unit with 8137 lamp uses 23" housing. HAl unit requres 26" housing. High Pressure Sodium r;:J FS-400 o FS·1000' 0 121 0 0 Finish Accessories (Ordered Separately) A B C D Specular [I Reflector ~- Wide ,--' -.... -\ Specular Reflector mJ Medium /-~ I \ Diffused Reflector ~ Very Wide ---"'--~ I --... \ Diffused • Reflector ." .. ~ ~ ----Wide /-.--. '\ , Page 2 of 6 Voltage 0 120 d 208 0 240 0 277 0 347 1;;1 480 0 QY' 0 BL' Bi-Level 0 TGR Textured 0 F-Fl-KIT·(F) Single Fuse Kit (120/277/347V) o 5MB-400' Shock Gray 0 Mounting 0 LQ Hoi/Cold Quartz Restrike F·F2-KIT·(F) Double Fuse Kit (20S/240/480Vj Bracket 0 TBK Textured 0 MF·l·(F) , 123" housing) 0 LQ40 Mastfitter o 5MB·1OOO' Hot/Cold Quartz Restrike Btock Shock: for Cold Weather storts to I;iI o TH.l.(F)' Lowering Adopter Mounting -40'( 1-40"1 TOB Textured (Tenon Hangerl Bradel Dark (26" housing) 0 F.F1 8 Single Fuse 1120/277Vj Bronze 0 HY·l·(F)' Trunion Base o TSA 0 FB·l Flat Base Mount 121 F_F2s Textured o WB·l·(F) Wall Bracket 0 Double Fuse (2();W40/480V) Satin PCM·l Photocell 0 Aluminum o WB·5·(F) Wiring Box (used with WB-' & Receptacle LB' Less Ballast (remote mount sur/ace mounled conduil leed) Mounting ballast) 0 TWHT Textured BrOCKel White 121 PX·l·(F) Cross-Arm Bracket 0 SK-40·(F) Cutoff Shield 0 COlO Cutoff optiCS 0 TGN Textured 0 AL-4-' Auxiliary Polymer Lens (23-' hou~ng) (23" housing) 0 HAl" Hazardous Location Hsled Green o SK·1OO·(F) Cutoff Shield o M(F) 0 AL-l0·F Auxiliary Polymer Lens (26" hou~ngl (26" housing) 0 50HZ 50 Hz Ballast operation Morine (consult factory) Grade o ALF-4.f.L/LENS·(F) Auxiliary Lens Frame (23" housing) finish; 0 TG Teflon bonded to Two-part epoxy prime! and 0 ALF·10·'·L/LENS·(F) Auxi{iary Lens Frome (26" hOUSing) gloss (ens a po/yIJrethane topcoat e'peciany suited for marine 0 ALF-l0·F·L/GLASS·LY8-(F) 26" Lens Frame with louver; erw" ..... menls and cocdal 0 PB(X) Pre-wired ballast applications 0 LENS·ALF·F-4-GLASS·(color) Colored Lens (23" housing): (color) '" lens color (X) '" SO cord length h1 feet (F)" Specify COlor. 3.' or 10 Eromple; MWHT. 0 LENS·ALF· F·l O·GLASS·( color) Colored Lens (26" hOusing): (color) '" lens color Marin .. Grad .. 0 EPXY·CTO·WHT While Epoxy WM"~nlSh 0 PM·l Wood Pole Mounting Kit (wllh one U-arm) coated Consult factory lor color avorlabiWy. 0 PM-2 Wood Pole Mounting Kit (with two U-arms) 0 EPXY ·CTO·GR Gray Epoxy 0 PM-3 Wood Pole Mounting Kit (with three U-arms) IF) -= specify frnish cooted 0 PM-4 Wood Pole Mounting Kit (with four U-arms) I) aM" prefix along with series designates UL 1598A Marine Listed option which includes addilional Marine Grade gasketing. Unit is specialty conslructed with low copper content alloy (less Ihan O.4~J for corrosion control in harsh coastal and industrial environments or wnerever marine type units are required. Meets U.S. Coost Guard specifications for marine type appNcations. may result in signifrcantly reduced performance. Consult factory to determine if a suitablE} Pulse Start Lamp ls avaiJable for the intended application. 7) Suitable tor HPS in any aiming position. 8) Fusing not available on MF series (marine listed) units. 9) Remote mount ballasts oplion5 and accessories are nal available with JOOOW HPS oron MF series (marine listed) units. 2) Wattages listed a;sume the use of clear lamps. Coated lamps also available tor lCO'JW metal halide. 3) For acceptable performance. note position orientation specific nature of Pulse Start Lamps. Operation of Pulse Starilamps In other than recommended burning positions -4) In \OOOW HPS units.lhe standard SO cord from ballast to optic head is replaced with flex conduit. Less ballast option; and accessories ore not available. 5) A and 8 reflectors are of Specular Mira -4 aluminum; C and D renectors are of Hammerlone Mira 9 aluminum. Curves renect coated lamp performance. 6) Allows fiekj selection of 120/2fJ8!2-40/277V. (No 480V). Certain opHons may require vollage 5e~tion as we~. <t> 2013 Koninktijke Philips Electronics N.V. All righu reserved. Speclflcations are subject to change without notice. www.philips.comlluminaires G200·116/0614 10) Available with Bond D reflectors onty. 1 I) HAZ lisling available in the US on MF units only. 400W and l000W only. HAZ ijsting not available in Canada F Series (available MF seri'Marine Listed with optional hazardous local listing) Industrial Floodlight -250-1500 watt HID Type: I Job: Beam Spread Data Reflector Type A Speculor Wide • Specular Medium c Diffused Very Wide o Diffused Wide Distribution Guide & Ballast Data w Source Catalog Renector Lamp Type(1) Number Type Envelope FM·l000 • BT56 MH FM·l000 C 6156 Clear FM·l000 D 8T56 lamps fM·1500 • BT56 fM·1S00 C BTS6 fM·1500 D BT56 Page 3 of 6 Max Horizontal X Vertical Candle HxV 10% 50% Source WaHage Power NEMA Field Angle Beom Angle MH coated 1000W MH clear JOOOW 1500W 43,000 249,000 351,000 7x7 3x4 3x4 38" x 62° 380 x 62° ---"--------------- MHcootad lOOOW 79,000 6x7 127°xI33° "'Pic'i8ar---'---250yr--'---S2,00Q -3x4--~ax-62" 400W 90,000 3 x 4 380 x 62° lOOOW 260,000 3 x 4 380 x 62" 117.000 3x4 39° x 53" 236,000 5x5 88° x87° MH c:lear IOOOW 83° x 37<' 58.000 7x6 1370 x 129" 1500W 83° x 37° 82,000 7x6 137°x 129 0 MH coated l000W 37,000 PS dear 250W 52,000 90,000 260,000 400W 1000W -------"-'---- HPS clear MH clear 400W 1000W 26,000 50.000 133,000 7x7 7x6 7x6 7x6 7x6 7x7 5x5 1500 x 1440 137"x 1290 137" x 129 0 1370 x 1290 137°xI25° 138°xI35° 93° x 76° 93° x 55° 83° x 37° B3"x3JO 83° x 37° 1000W 1500W ___ --=c"--187,000 5x5 93° x 76° MH coated PS clear 1 ooaw 37,000 7 x 7 150" x 144" 93" x 55" -------------" --------------~. 250W 52,aOO 5x5 93"x76" 28" x 36" 4DOW 90.000 5 x 5 93" x 76" 28" x 36" lOOOW 260,0005xS 93" x 76° 28"x36° ---"---------------------"_.-""---.". HPS clear .Ies FileName fmlOObssJes ImlOOcss.les 1m 1 OOdss.les 1m 150bss.les 1m l50css .Ies fmlS0dss.les 400W lOOOW 26,000 50.000 ANSI Code M47/ H36 M47 I H36 M47 I H36 M48 M48 M48 7x6 7x7 1370 x 1250 139 G x 135 0 Una Current 120/208/240/277/480 9.2 I 5.6 I 4.7 / 4.1 I 2.4 9.2 I 5,6 I 4.7 I 4.1 12.4 9.2 I 5.6 I 4.7 I 4.1 I 2.4 14.0 I 8.0 I 7.1 16.1 13.5 14.0 I 8.0 I 7.1 16.1 13.5 14.0/8.0/7.1 /6.1 13.5 Un. watts lOBO lOBO lOBO 1625 1625 1625 ------------------------------------------------------------------ MH Coaled Lamps PS Clear Lamps HPS Clear Lamps FM·l000 FM·l000 FM·l000 FM·l000 Fp·4OQ FP·400 Fp·400 Fp·l000 FP·l000 FP·l000 FS·400 FS·4OQ FS·4OQ FS·l000 FS·l000 FS·l000 A 8T56 , 8156 C 8156 D B156 • 8137 C B137 D BT37 • 8137 C 8137 D .137 8 EOl8 C ED18 D ED18 , E25 C '25 D E25 ImclOass.les M47 I H36 ImclObss.les M47/ H36 ImclOcss.les M47 I H36 ImclOdss.les M47 I H36 Ip40bssJes M135/M155 Ip4Ocss.les M135/ MISS fp40dss.ies M135/M155 Ipl00bss.ies M141 fp lOOcss.les M141 fp lOOdss.les MI41 fs40bss.les 551 fs40cssJes 551 h40dss.les 551 IslOObss.les 552 fsl00css.les 552 Is 1 OOdss.les 552 I) The F Series can accommodate a variety of other 4) LER values and efficiencies are not published. See NEMA wottogesal"ld lamps. Consult faclery. Standard LE·5B. 2) MH" Metal Halide. PS = Putse Start Metal Halide. 5) Intended aiming and possible lamp orientation restrictions HPS = High PressuroSodium. should be considered when selecting Hoadlight. 3) All ballasts are CWA (Conslant Wattage Autotranstormer). 4:> 2013 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. All righu reserved. Specifications are subject to change without notice. www.philips.comfluminaires G200-116/0614 9.2/5.6/4.7 1 4.1 /2.4 9.2/5.6/4.7 /4.1/2.4 9.2/5.6/4.7 /4.1/2.4 9.2/5.6 I 4.7 /4.1/2.4 4.0 1 2.2 / 1.9 I 1.8 / 1.0 4.0 / 2.2 / 1.9 f 1.8 / 1.0 4.0 / 2.2 / 1.9 / 1.8 / 1.0 9.0 I 5.2/ 4.5 / 3.9 1 2.4 9.0 I 5.2 /4.5 I 3.9 / 2.4 9.0 / 5.2 I 4.5 I 3.9 I 2.4 4.1 I 2.5 I 2.1 4.1 /2.5/2.1 4.1 12.5/2.1 1.9 I 1.1 1.9 I 1.1 1.9 I 1.1 9.5 I 5.5 / 4.8 I 4.2 J 2.5 9.5 I 5.5 I 4.8 I 4.2 I 2.5 9.5 I 5.5 J 4.8 I 4.2 I 2.5 EPA Effectjve ProjeCted Area in Ft I 23" housing 1.85 26" housing 2.93 lOBO lOBO lOBO lOBO 456 456 456 lOBO lOBO lOBO '" '" '" 1100 1100 1100 F Series (available MF Series: Ine Listed with optional hazardous locationtng) Industrial Floodlight -250-1500 watt HID Type: I Job: Option Details (F",ocy,,,,,,,,d) BL Bi-Level Note: Suitable for HPS in any aiming position. Consult foctory when spec/rylng dimming with Metal Halide. LQ Hot/Cold Quartz Restrike Note; Standard 150 watt (J 20V] double contact bayonet base sockel. Combined Quartz wattage may not e)(ceed HID lamp wattage. lQ40 Hot/Cold Quartz Restrike for Cold Weather Starts to -40°C (-40°F) F-Fl Single Fuse (120V/277Vj f-F2 Double Fuse (208V/240V/480V) Note: Fusing not available on MF series (marine listed) units. I( ordering QV ballast voltage must be specified. Si-Level provides high /Iow level of lamp output wth up to 50% power consumption. Zero cross- over network avoids strobing and lamp dropout. LQ -Provides UteMatic operation for fIXtures with 120V or multi-lap ballasts. LiteMalic Operation Page 4 of 6 °6 '0 0' '0 Normal Slart: Main and Quartz lamps both energized. Main Lamp •• ach •• Approximately 40"'01 RQled Oulput. Quam lamp automatically extinguishes (combined lamp currenT! never e~c"d that 01 main lamp at 100% output). Fuses are KTK/KLK 30 amp unless otherwise specified. Wilen Alc Exilnglllsllect. Auxiliary quartz lamp automatically energized when power i!. restored. Main lomp "·oelle, «m Dilated Outplll: Quartz lamp automatically .. xtinguish .... LB less Bollast (remote mount ballast) Optic unit with mounting arms shipped without standard integral mastfitter and ballast Note: Remote mOLint ballast options and accessories are not assembly. . available with IOOOW HPS or on MF series (marine listed) Llnlts. Requires mounting accessory MF-l. TH-l, HV-l, 5MB-400 or 5MB-WOO (shipped separately). CO Cutoff OptiCS For appllcations where glare control is needed. Note: Available with Band D reflectors only. Requires use ot proper cutolt shield accessory: SK-40-IF) or SK-1OO·/FI (shipped separately). HAl Hazardous location Listed Limited to 400W and rooow units only. Available on MF (marine listed) units only. (See Usting on page J.J Closs I. Division 2. Groups A. B, C and D. 50HZ 50 Hz Ballast Operation (consult factory) TG Tenon Bonded to Glass Lens PB(X) Pre-wired ballast, specify length of SO cord in f1: IX=3,60rl0) EPXY ·CTD·WHT EPXY ·CTD·GR White Epoxy Coated Gray Epoxy Coated Accessory Details (Field Installed -Shipped Separately) F-Fl-KIT -(F) Single Fuse Kit (120V/277Vj F-F2-KIT -(F) Double Fuse Kit (208V/240V/480Vj MF-l-(F) Mostfltter Note: Remote mount ballast options and accessories ore not available with IOOOW HPS or on Mf series (marine listed) units. @2013 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.Y. All rights reserved. Specifications are subject to change without notice. www.philips.comlluminaires G200-116/061-1 Class I Division 2. Groups A .•• C. D M.asur.d Max. Int.rna! Measured Max. External Catalog No. Operating Temperature Operatlng Temperature T Rating MFM-1OOO 339°C 163°C II MFP-400 316°C 131°C II MFP-lOOO· 339°C 163°C II "Therma/limits reqLlire 26" hOLising for MF Series IOOOW PS Llnit with UL B44/isted HAl option rating. MFS-400 MFS-l000 Data suppned by Texas Research InstlMe, Inc., corrected 10 23 6 C. II II Not.: The-clasdtlcatlon of an area a. to clan, dlvilion and groups and the us. of UL 844//sted lumlnalre. In such areal Is so/e-Iy the Judgemftnt of th. owner. Insurance camer and the authority havIng Juri.dlctlon. Specified for app~cations (oLitside the U.S.) where 50 Hertz operation is standard. 5 MIL Tefior:® bonded to standard glass lens. Allows wiring connections to be made in remote mounted junction box. Useful with various mounting accessories such as WSI waH bracket. Durable cooting offers protection against mildly acidic or alkaline conditions. Consists of I or 2 fuse holders and 1 or 2 KTK 30 amp fuses. Field installed on wiring access plate. Fusing not available with MF series (marIne listed) un/fs. (F) = specify finish Cast aluminum mastfitter for 2-3/8" 0.0. pipe tenon. For use with remote mounted ballast on all F Series models. (Requires a vertical tenon height of 4-5/8" minim Lim) (F) '" specify finish F Series (available MF seri"Marine Listed with optional hazardous local listing) Industrial Floodlight -250-1500 watt HID Type: I Job: TH-'-(F) Lowering Adapter (Tenon Hanger) No/e: Remote mount ballast options and accessories ore nol ovoHable with lOOOW HP$ oron MF series (marine is/ed) units. (F) .. specify finish HV-l-(F) Trunion Base Note: Remote mount bollsl options and occess01les ore not available with lOOOW HPS or on WB-'-(Fj WB-5-(Fj PX-'-(Fj MF series {marine listed} unr1s. m = specify finish Wall Bracket (F) = specify finish Wiring Sox for WB·] and surface mounted conduit feed (F) = specify finish Cross-arm Bracket For installing floodlights on wooden or steel cross~orms. (F) = specify finish 5MB·400 Shock Mounting Bracket (23" housing) 5MB-1000 Shock Mounting Bracket (26" housing) FB-' PCM-' Flat Base Mount Photocell Receptacle Mounting Brocket e 2013 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. All rights reserved. Specifications are subject to change without notice. www.philips.comlluminaires G20Q·116/061<1 Cost oluminum hanger tapped for 1-1/4" NPT conduit or pipe. Equips floodlights with remote mounted ballas!s for use on standard lowering devices. Mounting arms provided with fixture. {Requires a vertical tenon length of 4·5/B" minimum} Cast aluminum !runion base bracket calibrated for horizontal odjustment. For use with remote mounted ballast. I PageSof6 , , ---\.!: _~! 7.0" 11l."om) !_ ., 4.94" (12.SScm) 4.94'~ \---',k"11 2.S5cm ) Cost aluminum wall bracket for vertical surfoces only. Designed to permit mounting of floodlights on flot vertical surfaces. Use in conjunction with WB·5 for surface mounted wiring. Used in conjunction with W81 for surface mounted wiring. Topped lop, back and bottom for 3/4" conduit or pipe. Gasket provided for sealing surfoce wiring box to WB-! (wall mounting bracket). 9/16" Dlo. Hob (4 Places Typical) 5.63" _t Il~,29cmll square T----- 6.88" {17,.(6cmj square 2-3/8" Pipe Tenon )5" useable length) -L ________ -:i\,)=""';;fr.'1~"'3.2S' Deep ,....... ~ IB.25cmj Cast aluminum angle bracket v.ith 2" pipe stub. "l" base. 2--3/8" 0.0 Pipe Tenon ~~ 9/16" Okl. Hob IS PLTypJ FrantView Shad Mounting Brocket for use in applications where severe vibration may be present. Secures floodlight v.ith a remote mounted ballast less mounting arms or mostfitter. Constructed of hot-dip galvanized steel with neoprene pads to absorb shock. Corrosion resistant assembly hardware is furnished. Note: Not availoble with IOOOW HPS or on MF series (marine listed) units. Cast aluminum mounting brocket for installing floodlights on flat horizontal surfaces. For use with 2·3/B" OD pipe tenon {by others). Umi! tenon height to 8.0" (20.32cm). Bracket with standard twist-lock receptacle for models v.ith integral ballasts. Threads into 1/2" NPl hole in bollost bose or mostfiller. (Photocell not included.) TopV'.ew .04 SO· _L [n4J<:n'll.8B" f-· --[Q1J Ll.'t ,Or I-c.SO"~ (1I4lcml 0.5"[1270'Tl) Dio. (3 Piacils Typical) F Series (available MF Series: Ine Listed with optional hazardous locationlng) Industrial Floodlight -250-1500 watt HID Type: I Job: SK-40-(F) SK-l00-(F) Cutoff Shield for 23" housing Cutoff Shield for 26" housing AL-4-F AL-l0-F Auxiliary Polymer Lens for 23" housing A uxiliary Polymer Lens for 26" housing AL-4-F-L/LENS-(F) Auxiliary Lens Frome for 23" housing AL-l0-F-L/LENS-(F) Auxiliary Lens Frome tor 26" housing AlF-l0-F-L/GLASS-LV8-(F) Auxiliary Lens Frame with 8-lite internal louver LENS-ALF-F-4-GLASS-(color) Colored Auxinary lens for 23" housing LENS-ALF-F-l0-GLASS-(color) Colored Auxiiary lens for 26" housing PM-l PM-2 PM-3 PM-4 i'\iotes Wood Pole Mounting Kit with one U-arm Shipping wi.: 61bs (2.7 kg) Wood Pole Mounting Kit with two U-arms Shipping wi.: 9 Ibs (4.05 kg) Wood Pole Mounting Kit with three U-orms Shipping wt.: 12 fbs (5.4 kg) Wood Pole Mounting Kit with four U-arms Shipping wI.: 15 Ibs (6.8 kg) Cutoff shield provides precise vertical cutoff without distortion of lateral pattern. (F) = Specify finish. 1/4" thick impoct-resistant polymer lens provides additional protection 01 the glass lens. Furnished with mounting hardware and standoffs. I Page6of6 Designed for use with colored lenses. formed aluminum frome isolates the auxiliary lens from heal source for longer Hfe. Gasketed 10 minimize particulate and moisture entry. May be used as a snoot when installed without a lens. Mounting hardware included. IF) = Specify finish. For additional narrow beam glare control. specify the auxiliary lens frame with the 8-lite internal louver. Available for 26" housing only. (F) = Specify finish. Colored auxiliary lens (tully tempered gloss). Requires the use of the auxiliary lens frame. (color) = lens color. (Consult factory to specify color of glass lens.) Note: Colored lens reduces efflciency. For mounting luminaires with mastfltte~ to 6.0" 10 12.0" 0.0. wood poles. ~S~ PM-3 Ii' I , , 12.0" I / .... Ill.<&:ml ~ 1 PM-2, ~ ~ 12.0" /~ . ...i (30.48cm) I ~.';~ PM-4 i: 12.0" ~ . .d Ill.<&ml , I It! 2013 Koninklijke Philips N.V. All rights reserved. Specifications are subiect to change without notice. www.philips.comlluminaires Philips Lighting North America Corporation 200 Franklin Square Drive Im,oned by: Philips Lighting. a c ivision of Philips Electronics ltd. 281 Hillmount Rd. G200-116/0614 ,. ...• " " ........... ...... ,,, .. , ~ ... , '~J ""..,' .. Phone: 855·486·2216 ~~ .. rkham, ON L6C 253 Tel. 800·668·9008 ~ASNE ENGINEERINI, INC. 5 Bectrical and Technology Consultants APPENDIX C- EXISTING LIGHTING FIELD SAMPLES \1/ ~'''''''Ti! , ; I f--1 ~~ !----~ e-.' , f f--: ~; ~ ,~" 0 '-~ .--. ~ :'" " ",,,, '"'' n " 1\11 0 , , r r;'''l'''''' , " ",," "'" , r-L;"" "" "","""" ""~ I, ~, "'" , w ' , "'"'' "" """ ,~", ~", "'",,',''''''''' "J 1 ",IF;"' "" '" ,,""" "'''" . . .,,~ ,'; 5 ,~ " . ' ' ' ' , It!l -, r ). 1 . .~, .~' I Ii 1 . I , , , ."' ~ f- ,4, ~ ."' " . " , .' , ," • ."' , ~ , I " ~ .~' 1'l>,1 0 ~ . 0-, 2 . , , .- 1 , . ,<' 3, ."' ;4, , ,0 , \ I_~r,' I~' ,_ ·T ."".' . " ".4/" , ~"""'"'''''' '''" ""'"'''''' '" " , , , '" "''', '" '''''''',: "",,' ,,,,,, ' """,:~ ':S;~J END 'caJldJe l7leasUl'"elMnt lai(en l1fD911$ betweell ]:30 PM ana 11:30 PM, Weather . ." '''' """'" ~"'''-e ~ '-'-~ 0 n n;~!J:::'/"" ,,' ' -=''''''~ ., "~~B Z':(/ _ ,,__ , ~ ~" ~ " "\ ~ , ~ .... ~ ~~/ ~ =='~~~ , ' ",' '~ , , ~ ,_"""~,, '" ; '\' -------- \,' ~""". ",,,,,,,,,.,, '''I ",,,,, ' "" "'"'''''''''',,''''''''' ""","''''''''',,- , , . ,]J/., 72, 1', n· """"" "" """",,,, """'''',,'' ", ", ",,,, "" "" ., ",,,,,, " , :1.---: ~;" 1 1 ' ,,,,,,,. ' "," ," 1 ." • \\ T Ann_ .... aircraft ~ASNE ENGINEERINI, INC. f!i, Bectrical and Technology Consultants APPENDIX D- EXISTING LIGHTING MODEL • <.9 z I-en >< w ~ASNE ENGINEERINI, INC. E, Bectrical and Technology Consultants APPENDIX E- PROPOSED LIGHTING MODEL • • zz 'I ~ .. ... , . <Z Z 000 000 to. <rI"'''' :3000 BILLING INVOICE EG0004aa4 DEPARTMENT: CEO -Planning AR: Eden Invoice: BILLING CONTACT Mark Clement The Boeing Company POBox 3707, MS 1W-09 Seattle, WA 98124 REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME LUA 16-000028 PLAN· Environmental Review Printed On: January 14, 2016 Prepared Bv: Vanessa Dolbee 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 TRANSACTION TYPE Fee Payment Transaction Date: January 14, 2016 PAYMENT METHOD AMOUNT PAID TOTAL $3,d9b.dd RECE\VED JI'IN 1 4 20\0 ON Of RE.NTON PLANNING OI\lISION Pagel of 1