HomeMy WebLinkAboutAudience Comment - Baker Submitted bole 'i3a c
4(0(2,0
Dear Mayor and Members of the Renton City Council,
I am here to express my strong support for the city of Renton to acquire the Lakeside Industries Proposed
Asphalt Plant site, located at 18825 Renton-Maple Valley Rd SE AKA Hwy 169. This strategic move
would capitalize on a crucial opportunity to safeguard our community's water supply and protect the
environmental integrity of our city.
The chosen site for the proposed asphalt plant is located on top of the Cedar Valley Aquifer, which
provides drinking water for the entire city of Renton. Consultants for Lakeside Industries have stated that
they plan to inject their treated industrial runoff straight into the ground. This runoff could contain any
number of things, including tar, gas, oil, and other industrial contaminants.
As an example, the city of Seattle has purchased 91,000 acres of the Chester Morse Lake watershed to
protect their water supply, and the city of Irvine California is set to spend $360 million dollars to close
down a single asphalt plant to improve their air quality. By contrast, the Lakeside Industries Asphalt plant
site is currently only valued at about $12 million. But unfortunately that price will go up substantially if the
plant is constructed and actively polluting our water and air.
Acquiring this river-front site would additionally offer an opportunity for the city to explore alternative uses
that could benefit the community economically and socially. Whether through green space development,
educational opportunities, renewable energy projects, or other environmentally friendly initiatives, the city
council has a chance to demonstrate leadership in promoting sustainable development practices.
We urge the Renton City Council to move forward with diligence and determination in pursuing the
acquisition of the Lakeside Industries Proposed Asphalt Plant site, using eminent domain if necessary. By
doing so, you will not only protect our water supply, but to uphold the values of environmental
stewardship and community well-being that define our city.
Thank you for considering my perspective on this critical matter. We look forward to seeing Renton
continue to thrive as a model of responsible urban development
KING COUNTY'WATER DISTRICT NO. 90
KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 1041
A RESOLUTION of'the Board of Commissioners of King County Water District No.
90, King County, Washington, opposing a proposed Lakeside Industries Asphalt
Plant located at 18825 SSE Renton Maple Valley Road,and other industrial activities
along the Cedar River. ti
WHEREAS, The Board of Commissioners are elected, and given the power pursuant to .
57.08 RCW et.al.to provide an ample supply of water for all uses and purposes public and private
for the benefit of the inhabitants of the District and other persons;
WHEREAS, the District has constructed facilities, engaged in comprehensive planning,
performed studies, performed wellhead `protection planning, coordinated with hydrogeologists,
engineers and other experts, and other activities to provide for a clean and ample supply of water;
WHEREAS,The Board of Commissioners and District staff monitor developments and other
activities that may have an impact on the safety, quality, and security of District infrastructure and
resources;
WHEREAS,The District has been made aware of a proposed asphalt plant to be located at
18825 SE Renton Maple Valley Rd.,which plant is within the Districts 10-year recharge area of the
District's wellfield,which wellfield provides an important and necessary portion of the District's water
supply for the benefit of those served by the District;
WHEREAS,Any contamination of the recharge area and/or District wellfield will result in a
substantial risk to the health and well being of the District's customers, and cause a negative
financial impact to the District and its customers if the use of the wellfields are in any way limited or
lost;
RESOLUTION NO. 1041
SUBJECT: Opposing asphalt plant
PAGE - 1
WHEREAS, The District understands that any contamination of its wellfields could cause
losses to the District in the hundreds of thousands of dollars per year;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of King County
Water District No. 90, King County, Washington, as follows:
The elected Board of Commissioner hereby object to any industrial activities within any
portion of the District's wellfield recharge area. The Board requests that King County,and any other
agency with authority to approve or permit an industrial use within the recharge area, deny such
request or permit. The Board further requests that the King County Council impose a permanent
moratorium or other appropriate limitation on any industrial use along the Cedar River. The King
County Council should take such action as is necessary and lawful to protect this vital resource for
the benefit of current and future citizens of King County and the customers of King County Water
District No. 90.
District staff is authorized to provide testimony, correspondence, and other information to
support this resolution. •
ADOPTED by the Board of Commissioners of King County Water District No. 90, King
County, Washington, at a regular open public meeting thereof on the 3rd da April, 2018.
la Ce.:121 1540011444''''' 17/`-3 '4 , ' 2 , 0 940
Dick Gidner, President Byron Murgatroyd,Secretary
413/ite
Sam Ira,Vice-President
RESOLUTION NO. 1041 •
SUBJECT: Opposing asphalt plant
PAGE -2
4 I.
king County
King County Water District No.90
15606 SE 1280,Street
Renton,WA 98059
425-255-9600
Water:OW*No.no info@kcwd90.com
March 14,2018:
Metropolitan King County Council
King County Courthouse
518 Third Ave, Room 1200
Seattle,WA 98104-3272
RE: King County Ordinance 18611 —Review of Cedar River Sites industrial Moratorium Study •
Dear Honorable King County Council Members,
In 2014, King County Water District No. 90(KCWD90 or the District) completed a Wellhead
Protection Plan Study with our hydrogeologists, Pacific Groundwater Group. A summary map
from that study is attached to this letter for your reference. As you will see from the map, the
proposed Lakeside Industries Asphalt Plant, located at 18825 SE Renton Maple Valley Rd., is
within the 10-year recharge area of the District's welifield.
While it may take a full 10 years for a oontaminant to reach our wells,the potential impact of well
contamination could beiextremely costly to KCWD90. If we were not able to operate the three
existing wells In our welifield,the cost to the District would be upwards of$500,000 annually In
additional water purchases from Seattle Public Utilities.
The District is strongly opposed to potential industrial activities that could ultimately cause harm
to the District's public water supply. We would appreciate the Council to consider a permanent
moratorium on this type of industrial use,along the Cedar River.
Please call me at 425-255-9600 or email me at par twawAy j so we can further discuss
this property in more detail.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
140A.11 91 ;1...4.11---
941 -
Daroey J.Peterson
General Manager
King County Water District No. 90
enclosure
ii.
,,, ,. A:d. �ndix M
Aor
�''#"p�, : T1t;:i
f� ...Trearrna 2 - f
��
s b Jonas , 1441\.,,._'(12:77/1.t..„
, i Wei 1
c Well 2,` � 'ti
d.
RENTALS �' ad' e@IA0711
Feet . i
, , .,— -
2,000 t „�
I ✓ /` r a i��.; A:
•
S KCWD#90 Well Locations 0 Hazardous Sites(Facility/Site Database)
W8lihead Protection Capture Zonal Figure 4
King County Wastewater System Service Area(City of Renton)
Cs Month vwsPCZ �r ConcernPeroei of Concern Number Tied to Table) Zoning, Parcels of
1 Year WHPCZ 00 Coal Mine Hazard Areas(from King C Concern,
5 Year WHPCZ Hazardous Sites
Zoning Categories
() 10 Year WHPCZ 11101. Industrial
Residential --.__
Renton fire chief expresses safety concerns over
proposed asphalt plant I Letters
Renton Regional Fire Authority has serious concerns regarding the proposed asphalt
plant due to the high hazard risk it presents, fire chief says.By Cameron Sheppard
cameron.sheppard@ rentonreportercom•February 15, 2023 7:00 am
The Renton Regional Fire Authority (RRFA) is an all-hazards capable fire service agency for the
City of Renton,Fire District 25 and Fire District 40. Despite this, the RRFA has serious concerns
regarding the proposed asphalt plant, located at 18825 Renton-Maple Valley Road in Renton,
due to the high hazard risk it presents.
This type of plant has several highly toxic, combustible and flammable chemicals for the
manufacture of asphalt that are incompatible with life and the environment. Also, asphalt plants
can include emergency incidents that result in explosions from asphalt fumes, fire and toxic
exposures.
The RRFA also has concerns over the runoff that would occur from either fighting a fire or a
chemical spill that may occur, and the close proximity of the Cedar River. A catastrophic failure
due to explosion or a seismic event could create the right conditions for entry into the river and
grow the hazard area exponentially due to the movement of the water.
Despite requiring vigorous safety and fire prevention systems, these plants are vulnerable to
catastrophic failures if any part of the system fails. The atmospheric release of toxins from a spill
or fire can have long-reaching impacts on the surrounding population, and the crews who
respond to mitigate the emergency. Any type of emergency at this facility will involve several
resources from multiple agencies,that may have an impact on other jurisdictions and their
response capabilities to other emergencies, due to the large number of resources required, and the
time needed to effectively handle an emergency of this magnitude. •
In addition, in talking with other jurisdictions that have asphalt plants in their area of response,
some noted issues with the delivery vehicles and the problem of leaking chemicals as they
traversed area roads,and the lack of ability to address these issues. With the Renton-Maple
Valley Road consisting of only two lanes, the RRFA is concerned regarding the potential for
these chemicals to combust on the roadway. Not only would this close a major thoroughfare, but
access to mitigate these emergencies would be hampered at the least by difficult access and slow
response times.