No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-253 (3) BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITIF SPECIAL P� �M i r SP- a53- 78 TO FILL d- GRADE IN MP ZONE GAIZFIELD ASSOClfiTION LTD. Id �31 � 78 7i OF R4,4 40 o THE CITY OF RENTON `$ '0 Z MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 90 235- 2550 9ITE'D SEPSE���P -,01222,17 MEMORANDUM ,/t \ p�\y6o s��� F�� February 19 , 1980 TO: Warren C. Gonnason , Public Works Director ! okRS �R FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director OR C>'' ���,L By: Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner L9 RE: BOND AMOUNIKARWIELD AUSOCIATES On October 30 , 1979 , the Planning Department responded to a request for final inspection of the Garfield Associates' building located at 200 S.W. 34th Street and informed the Building Division that the landscaping was incomplete; a deferral would have to be obtained from the Board of Public Works; and the bond amount for the landscaping should be $60 ,000. Subsequently , Continental , Inc. , acting for the permanent lender, The Travelers Insurance Company, advised the Public Works Department that only $18,000 would be necessary to install the landscaping and that $30,000 would be held back in the loan. On December 6, 1979 , the Public Works Department informed the applicant that the $30 ,000 was sufficient. The discrepancy between the security actually obtained by the Public Works Department and the amount recommended by the Planning Department seems very unusual. The Planning Department is the only City department having a landscape architect on its staff . Will the Building Divi- sion begin implementing a new policy not to take advantage of our field of expertise? That approach does not appear to be logical or to support a united City position. RJB:wr cc: Ron Nelson 4 OF R�� �� THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o al CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A `O L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 0,9gTet) SEPT . December 15, 1978 Mr. Donald Orazem 15046 Bothell Way N.E. Seattle, WA 98155 ' RE: File No. SA-252-78, SP-253-78; Garfield Associates, Ltd. Dear Mr. Orazem: • This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, which were approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of November 30, 1978, have not been appealed within the time period , established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sin - y, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk I SA-252-78 Page Two SP-253-78 • temporary paving on S.W. 34th Street to East Valley Road if truck traffic utilizes the roadway prior to installation of improvements, and requested that the wording be revised to allow access by construction vehicles to the site. Mr. Clemens agreed to change the wording to •read, "If truck traffic to the completed facility is to use S.W. 34th Street. . ." noting the addition of the underlined phrase to the sentence which would allow utilization of the unimproved roadway during the construction period. • The, Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no.. response. Mr. Clemens inquired regarding the applicant's final determination of curbing . ' height at the western portion of the property for the purpose of separating truck traffic from proposed landscaping. Mr. Orazem reported-that only a standard six-inch extruded concrete curb would be feasible at the subject location. The Examiner inquired ,regarding the elevation height of the fill storage area. Mr. Orazem reported that 4500 cubic yards of fill would be stored until utilized for landscape berms or by other developments in the surrounding area, although such arrangements for sale of the surcharge material had not been finalized. • The Examiner inquired regarding exterior building color. Mr. Orazem responded that the • building would be an off-white or cream color with a contrasting stripe consisting of orange and dark brown, the company colors. The 'Examiner requested clarification regarding the restrictive covenant for the required 60-foot distance between buildings on the eastern portion of the property. Mr. Orazem reported that Burlington Northern Company had transmitted a letter which had indicated covenants were being drafted, but receipt had not yet occurred. The Examiner requested a copy of the letter which he entered into the record as, follows: • Exhibit #8: Letter from Burlington Northern regarding future restrictions on the property Mr. Clemens clarified that the restriction would be imposed on the adjoining property to serve the subject property and the site to the east. Mr. Orazem confirmed that all requirements had been met by the applicant on the subject site. The Examiner inquired regarding proposed methods of dust and mud control during' landfill . operations. Mr. Orazem indicated that the compaction operation would occur as soon as possible, and dust would be controlled by natural rainfall and a sprinkling truck if necessary. He also reported that landfill would not be transported onto the site via the East Valley Highway. The Examiner inquired regarding erosion control methods. Mr. Orazem indicated that no problem with erosion will occur due to the fact that the land is level and very porous. He agreed that dikes would be provided in the event erosion occurred. The Examiner inquired if the landscaping plan conforms to requirements of Resolution No. 1923, and if the proposed development conforms to the Parking and Loading Ordinance and to all conditions of the final plat of Orillia Industrial Park. Mr. Clemens responded affirmatively. The Examiner requested submittal of Exhibit #8 from the applicant as soon as possible. He then requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. SA-252-78 and SP-253-78 was closed by the Examiner at 10:40 a.m. • FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: • 1. The request is for approval 'of a special permit for• a landfill operation •and approval of a site plan for a.143,800 square foot warehouse and 3,000 square foot repair garage in the M-P zone. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is uncontested, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact_ of this development. November 30, 1978 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER . CITY OF RENTON . • REPORT' AND RECOMMENDATION . APPLICANT: Garfield Associates, .Ltd. FILE NO. SA-252-78 • . ..(Donald E. ,Orazem, 'Agent) SP-253-78 LOCATION: Between S.W. 29th and S.W. 34th Streets, 300 feet west of the • East Valley Highway. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval for development of a • 144,000 square foot warehouse facility in an M-P zone along with approval of a special permit for fill and grade. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. . Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with' conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT • The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on November 22, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report', 'examining available information on file with the application, and field checking' the property and surrounding: area, the ' , . Examiner conducted a public hearing on' the subject as follows: '. . , The hearing was opened on November 28, 1978 at 10:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: . Exhibit #2: Site Plan as submitted • Exhibit #3: Site Plan designating adjacent development Exhibit #4: Planting Plan . Exhibit #5: Surcharge Fill Plan and Details Exhibit #6: Planting Plan with staff comments Exhibit #7: Building Elevations 1 Mr. Clemens referenced Section 0.16 of Exhibit #1 which states that the 60-foot open space on the east side of the building must be substantiated prior to issuance of a building permit, and explained that the condition is a' requirement of the building and fire codes, not the, zoning code. He also noted that •a restrictive covenant will be provided by the Burlington Northern Company to substantiate the open .space. , Mr. Clemens also advised that Section P.1 of Exhibit #1 regarding development of S.W. 34th Street-and S.W. 29th Street ' •should be,deleted since responsibility for future development Of the roadways lies with . Burlington Northern; and the second sentence in Section P.2 pertaining to widening of the westerly property line planter should also be deleted. The Examiner• asked the representative for the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1: . ' Responding was: . ' Donald Orazem 15046 Bothell Way N.E. ' Seattle, WA 98155 . •Mr. Orazem indicated his concurrence in the report. He explained that a compromise regarding the landscaping on the westerly..property line was. being. effected with replacement of a. 10- foot wide cluster of. trees at the northern. entrãñce, and was acceptable to the Planning,, , Department. Mr. Orazem referenced Section' P.9 of Exhibit #1' Which' requires installation,of . l SA-252-78 Page Four SP-253-78 2. Approval of the storm drainage plans by the Public Works Department. 3. Monitoring of the landfill operation relative to the need for dust control and imposing of appropriate measures by the Public Works Department when deemed necessary. 4. Completion of appropriate temporary 'off-site improvements prior to occupancy of the buildings per approval of the Public Works Department. 5. Revision of- the landscape plan per Exhibit #6• and to insure compatibility with landscaping of the westerly, adjacent development per review and approval of the Planning Department. . 6. Compliance with all other. applicable •city ordinances and'regulations: 7. Approval of the Flood Zone Control Permit. • • ORDERED THIS 30th day of November, 1978. • gbooL1f - - - - -L. k Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of November, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Donald 'E.' Orazem , Garfield Associates, Ltd. 15046 Bothell Way N.E. Seattle, WA 98155 TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of November, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti • Councilman Richard M. Stredi.cke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. GOnnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before December 14, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure,. errors of law or.fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to, the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. SA-252-78 Page Three SP-253-78 5, There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All utilities are available or require extension from existing facilities. . 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-730 (M-P) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. . , . 8. The proposed landfill complies with, the setback and fill,-material, requirements of ','. . Chapter 23 (Mining, Excavation and Grading) ;' Title' IV, Ordinance .NO: 1628 ' Code of'' ' • General Regulations. StOrm drainage and, erosion control plans have not yet been. . approved by the Public Works Department per Sections 4-2313.10, 4-2316.7, 4-2318 and 4-2319. Control of dust and mud on the property or adjacent properties is not proposed since the landfill operation will be conducted during the next few winter • months. 9. This property is part of the Orillia Industrial Park final plat (FP-176-78) , ' • approved July 17, 1967. Off-site improvements have not been completed but have been bonded for completion. . 10. Approximately 4500 cubic yards of landfill is proposed to be stored at the northern portion of 'the site (Exhibit #5) . Stabilization of this landfill is not proposed. Landscaping will be,planted at the westerly, northerly and easterly perimeter' Of the landfill (Exhibit #4) . If the fill material can be utilized at other sites in the area, it will be sold and deported to those sites. ' 11. The landscaping plan, Exhibit #4, conforms to Resolution No. 1923' and the .Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. . , CONCLUSIONS: , 1. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding 'area and is consistent with the Green River Va1ley,Comprehensive Plan (Sections 4-2303.2.B and C) . It contributes to ". . .high operational, development and environmental standards." (Section 4-730.010) . 2. Storm drainage and erosion control plans must be evaluated and approved by the. Public Works Department prior to commencement of the landfill operation. Erosion control should be integrated with the landscape plan: Perhaps .hydroseeding of the fill . storage area would be' appropriate if this fill material is retained on the site. ' It. 'is appropriate that the landfill slopes and standing fill material be stabilized . to prevent erosion., , 3. Although ,it is very likely' that normal winter 'rainfall and moisture will substantially control dust during the landfilling activity, the Public Works Department should monitor the operation and require dust control measures if deemed necessary. ' . 4'. Improvements to S.W. 29th and S.W. 34th Streets will be constructed respectively by ' the Glacier Park Company and LID .302. These improvements become necessary relative to the subject application when the proposed facility is constructed and occupied. Access for the heavy trucks .will be necessary over these two streets. Therefore, • • appropriate temporary .improvements in these streets should be. completed as required by the Public Works Department pending construction of permanent improvements. 5. Exhibit #6 contains the landscaping plan with staff recommendations for additional plant material. These recommendations appear.appropriate along the westerly property line separating the proposal from the abutting Superior Fast Freight.facility that was approved on July. 31, 1978 (SA-202-78) . . It is also appropriate that this landscaping be compatible •with the' Superior Fast Freight landscape plan. This will further implement the Green-River Valley COmprehensive'Plan. . 6. The Uniform Building Code requires a 60-foot separation between buildings proposed. Per the attached letter of November 22, 1978, (Exhibit #8) Burlington Northern Railroad Company is aware of the implications of this-requir,ement relative to the vacant property easterly of the subject site. Approval of the submitted special permit will precede development of the easterly property; therefore, this letter should suffice as testimony that Burlington 'Northern knowingly accepts the ' consequences. DECISION: - Approval of the special permit subject to: , 1. ' Submission of erosion control plans to the Public Works Department for review and approval. %� PEC IVEo 'o. "11.191 met' BURLINGTON NORTHERN I. .vov 30 ,, ' Cenh' B :i f �,u q j i'"n ; P,A. ')E: 'EL.;!P' L N T AND SedItle, ',1.'a4hirigtun'��104 n��-)pL 1AN.r EMEN' ,brae :::;,,it DEPARTMENT Telephone • t'r)61 6 ' �'` DEP� • • The City of Renton November 22, 1978 Building Department . Municipal Building: . 210 Mill Avenge South. • • Renton, Washington 980SS Attention: Mr. Hanson Gentlemen: This has reference to the Preliminary Plat filed with and accepted . by the City of Renton covering Glacier Park Company property designated as Burlington Northern Orillia Industrial Park at Renton. It has cone to our attention that the City of Renton requires a 60-foot clearance tetween buildings when they fall within a:certain . • building.category under your building permit requireasats,. and w • • have been advised that this problei exists within a portion of . • our recently platted Orillia Park which is being sold to Garfield Associates Ltd. This is to .advise the City of Renton that w are :arranging to . reserve within the deeds of conreyaace-a 20=loot easement or building setback on either side of our 20-foot lead track right of way extending north from the north line of S.M. S4th Street to the south line of S.W. 27th Street within the City of Renton. . Very truly yours, ' / __• . N. C. Kretsa Assistant Manager • Property Management 'RECEIVED cc: • lb. Josephine Frandsen CITY i.}F R;O N Strain Transportation Hrnr;►r�c� -�.;.,Pytff.E(� 1040 Andover Park West ON ' ) 1970 . '. Tukwila, WA 98188 AM PM f File: RE-1486 .• Orillia, WA . ' il, • . ' , • .1-1.,; 2\-.I 4../..1,'.) i. .1. r', '' . y . .. P �1�ti . . ` n C '' _ ''I ' i I 1 J l V i,'i J. J'r do .�rc�w r-. 7.• • FR . CITY OF 'RENTON RECFh�ED �o =APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT (' OCT 31 1978 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY • 2 ,� File No . SP- A�3 7� -Date Rec'' d. �G DEP�' Application Fee $J 7 "7Jr Receipt No . /;45—`" • :•Environmental Review Fee $• o/i7,�?C.� // • APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name Donald E. 0razem Agent for Garfield Assoc. Ltd. Phone 362-0477 • Address L5046 Bothell Way N.E. Seattle, WA 98155 • 2. Property location Orillia Industrial Park • 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Lots 4 & 9, Block 1 , Division 1 , Section 31 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East. Recorded under Burlington Northern Orillia • Industrial Park Subdivision, King County,Wsshington • • • 4 . Number of acres .or square feet 9.11 acres Present Zoning MP 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? a 144,000 square foot transfer warehouse equipped with truck and rail loading facilities and a separate 3000 square foot maintenance garage. 6 .. . The following information shall be submitted with this application : • A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale 'existing structures , easements , and other .factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning • ' ' on adjacent parcels) ' 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) . E. A special permit- required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in ,addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Data Denied . Date Appealed Appeal Action • Remarks • • • , Planning Dept. 1-77/ A_t a a x {; AFFIDAVIT • Josephine Frandsen ,. being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of. my knowledge and .belief. • Subscribed and sworn before me this d of 7 19 6 - Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at (2...„20d_e J (Name of Notary Public) ( gn xre of Owner) 1040 Andover Park West (Address) (Address) 44. • Tukwila Washington .. (City) (State) • • • • 206 575 3023 _ (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me, and has been found thorough and complete in every..particular and to conform to the r` - ar�I ?.ulations of the Renton. Planning 'Department governing the f-/ i 0• 15,17n - pplication. RECvE Date Received _ i, 19 By: • • N/A, pE10Q.�1%"' Renton Planning Dept: ��" 2-73 7- D. E. ORAZEM & ASSOCIATES INC. -\ at/ a STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS - •, 15046 BOTHELL WAY N.E. SEATTLE,WASH. 98155 ^Y 31 '�(,�� (206) 362-0477 3 1 4A, October 31 ; 1978 � 1?!..G— Ds?;:f David R. Clemens, Associate Planner City of Renton Planning Department Municipal Building Renton, WA Subject: Auto Freight Warehouse Orillia Industrial Park . Here are two copies of a grading and filling permit application 4, 19 together with the following other documents: /„ % Ifd 1 Check for $537.75 /- �, l���� 5 Drawing 1 Plot plan and vicinity map . � L 5 Drawing Cl Surcharge fill plan 2 Environmental checklist forms 2 Owner's affidavit 1 Soils and foundation report prepared by Roger Lowe Associates. Final drainage and on-site retention-detention details will conform to the King County Hudraulics Department regulations. Filling will begin as soon as a permit is issued. Approximately one month will be required to install surcharge fill which must remain in place about eight weeks. Once it is established that the: surcharge fill has discontinued to subside significantly. final site grading will be completed. The compacted in place quantity of surcharge fill is approximately 35,000 cubic yards. All but approximately 4,500 cubic yards of this fill will be used to bring the building to dock height and for site subgrades. This excess will be stockpiled in a mound on the north undeveloped portion of the site. All grading operations are - - expected to be completed -within three months' time following issuance . of the permit. Please let me know if there is anything else you need to make your - evaluation in time for the November- 28 hearing. Cordially, ,V ,,Q`I O Donald E. Orazem. P.E. DEO/vc' CC: Garfield Associates, Ltd. • -2- 7. Locatipn of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the, extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental' setting of the proposal ) : The proposal will be located in the Burlington Northern Company's Orillia Industrial Park. • 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : July 1, 1979 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : Fill permit; site plan approval ; building, plumbing and electrical permits. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: • None at the present time. • 11. 13.0 you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: The adjoiner to the -west may participate in the cost of a water line along the adjoining property Tine. • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, 'describe the nature of such application form: An application for a fill permit is attached. Other permits and .1. approval applications itemized under #9 above will be submitted at a later date.. II. ENVIRONMENTIAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth.! Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X TES— MAYBE AU— (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X t (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X bled of the ocean or' any bay, inlet or lake? • YES MAYBE'ff Explanation: b & c) Approximately 80% of the site will be covered with buildings and pavement requiring compaction and over_covering of the soils as well as changes in grade. ' CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM "�+d) al gyp---- ,f. I FOR OFFICE USE ONLY .tf r -7 Application No. 6/9' s3-7� `, � �' «�'� Environmental Checklist No. Vaf�� � ��n1GU � PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Signifitcance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non'Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: • • • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. • Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your • explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should . include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all - agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The "following questions apply to your total proposal ,. not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is• sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review' now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies, in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal ., 1f a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent . Garfield Associates, Ltd. • 2. Address and phone 'number of Proponent: 1040 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 575-3023 • 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: • Auto Freight Warehouse 6. Nature and brief description of 'the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : A 144,000 square foot "transfer warehouse equipped with rail and truck loading facilities. 4300 square feet of staff offices will be provided - within the main warehouse structure. A separate 3000 square foot maintanance garage complete with bulk fuel handling capabilities will be contained in a separate structure_ • -4- • (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: . (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic, organisms, insects or microfauna)?' X 1 Y N0 (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or ,, endangered species of fauna? X YES MBE NO ('c) Introduction of new species of fauna Into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? ti X YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife, habitat? X YES MAYBE I� Explanation: • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X ' YES MAYBE NO Explanations • (7) Light and Glare. W11'1 the proposal produce new light or glare? X - YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The yards will have low level lighting. (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or 'planned .land use of an area? X YES MTYBE NO • Explanation: • (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural' resources? X i! YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk Of an explosion or the release Of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in. the event of an accident or upset condition's? X YE' WYE W Explanation-: - (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- button, density, or growth rate of the human population X ofI an area? Y1'r- MAYBE NT— Explanation: • - Y • v . -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: , (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?1 X YES au- . (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YET— MAYBE (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X • . Y!T MAYBE Nl- Explanation: t . (3) Water. Will the, proposal result in: ' la) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of X water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? . ET- WEE ''NU—, (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X , YET- MAYBE NU` (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? XX YE; MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in, any water X body? YES MAYBE N0 (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration . surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? • X Yr .MAYBE R (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? . YET-- MAYBE NU- (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters,-either through direct ,additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or- excavations? X YES MAYBE No (h) Deterioration' in ground water quality, either through . di.rect' injection, or through' the seepage of leachate, • phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X VET- MAYBE AU- . (I) 'Reduction in the •amount of water otherwise available X, for public water supplies? . Y S MAYBE N0 Explanation: b) Approximately 80% of the site will be paved or under • - roof thus changing the absorption rate. Storm water runoff will bei'detained on site in accordance with the requirements of the King 'County Hydraulics -- (4) lDet ora en ' will lf the proposal result in: .- (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? — E X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or - X endangered species of flora? • YES MAYBE WU- (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or ' in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? �_ BE ff (d) . Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YEr- MAYBE AU- . . Explanation: . r ` n -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO (e) StOrm water drainage? X YES RAYNE W- (f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation,: 'The pr..oposal will of course require power, natural gas, telephone, water, sanitary sewers and storm water drainage. However, none of the requirements of this proposal have any unusual effect on the developer's facilities. (17) 'Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding • mental health)? X YES MAYBE VU— Explanation: • (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon 'the X quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MBE N� Explanation: (20) Arc'heological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical X site, structure, object or building? ES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: (signed) Donald E. Orazem, P.E. (name printed) Agent for Garfield Associates, ' Ltd. City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE N'O • Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? , YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X Vim- MAYBE N� (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or .goods? X . YET- RITE ' NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X • YBE MAYBE NO (f) Increase in. traffic hazards to motor vehicles, • bicyclists or pedestrians? X MAYBE N0 • Explanation: a & e) The proposal is for a truck and rail terminal and there will necessarily be increased truck and rail traffic. (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or - result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE (b) Police protection? - X YES MAYS NO . (c) Schools? - X YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? ' X YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other_ governmental services? X • . • YES MAYBENO . Explanation: a,b, ,& e) The individual proposal would have little effect on these services. However, as the area develops there will undoubtedly • be substantial impact on these services. (15) Energy,. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MMAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YET- MAYBE 0- Explanation: (16) Utilities. 'Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO X (b) Communications •systems? YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO OF / ?4, ' • �� 5' THE CITY OF RENTON U y �= z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 `� %� ' n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT o t� °9 �• 235- 2550 P October 31 , 1978 Donald E . Orazem, Agent for Garfield Assoc . Ltd . 15046 Bothell Way NE Seattle , Washington 98155 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL OF TRANSFER WAREHOUSE AND LOADING FACILITIES , FILE NO : SA-252-78 ; and APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE, FILE NO : SP-253-78; property located between S . W. 29th and S . W. 34th Streets , 300 feet west of East Valley Highway. Dear Mr. Orazem: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on October 31 , 1978 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for November 28, 1978 at 9 : 00 a .m. . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. ricksen Pl anni n Director By:. (174eIV dair-41 David .R.. Clemens Associate Planner cc : Josephine Frandsen 1040 Andover Park West Tukwila , Washington 98188 . agl' Ataiti Ei 0 U E.,S L 0 1R1 F' FA 5 S fa El ,R1 T L:S - June 28, 1977 .-._-,,:: • 1 • ;� off. R�jV� - •,:, � , • . .: allEO:;: ::: Garfield Transfer Company 31._19.t8;... , c/o Mr. Don Orazem • JCT �, • '. - _15046 Bothell- Way N.E: " k-c. • _ wSeattle, Washington - 98155 •• . • Report N/jV� DES Foundation Investigation . Proposed Garfield Warehouse Renton, Washington • .- :. • RLA Project No. 218-02 . ' Gentlemen: • INTRODUCTION • This report presents the results of.our -foundation 'investigation for; " the proposed warehouse facility for the Garfield Transfer: Company. -The site. is located in Burlington Northern's Orilla Industrial Tract, about 3000 "feet.north . ' of S.E.. 180th' Street and 300 feet west of East Valley Road;. • The proposed :build- • ing is shown on the attached Plot Plan, Plate 1 . The purpose.of our investiga " '_. tion is to evaluate the subsurface soil conditions and- to" make" recommendations" ---_-- regarding site development and foundation design criteria.• Our. work _included ' . seven test borings, field and laboratory soils -testing, and" engineeri"ng analyses:, The scope of our work is"described in our letter proposal .of June 2; 1977-, which was authorized by Mr. J. Frandsen on June 8, 1977.. .. • - ;, SITE CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - The site is filled land on the flood plain. of the. Green River., '-The '".. :ground surface is nearly level at approximately Elevation" 16 (Mean SeaLe.vel : ; .-Datum is' used throughout this "report) . Prior to "filling, "the. site •was.:swampy and covered. wi th grass and cattails. . We understand the: f.i l l was placed -i n'.1976, .. • The warehouse building will be about 96,000 sq. ft. ,in •area .an.d":,hive . - plan dimensions of about 600 feet by 160 feet, Preliminary: plans are:•for..a" dock- high slab-on-grade at approximately El . 22. and for' a finished exterior grade' _ : • MAIL-=POST OFFICE BOX 530,MERCER ISLAND,WA 98040,TELEPHONE(206)232-5325 LOCATION; ISLAND OFFICE PLAZA,SUITE 213,2737-77th AVE.,S.E.,MERCER ISLAND . • Garfield Transfer Company June 28, 1977 Page • at approximately Elevation 18. The columns would he at 40 x 53-foot spacing::;. The dead load on the columns is approximately 41 kips and the exterior wall .. loading is approximately 4.2 kips per foot. The design floor load is 250 .pounds per square foot (psf) . There will be a repair shop building .to the :north. ofi the warehouse. This single story structure will have plan dimensions of 64 x 6:1 feet. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS We explored subsurface conditions by drilling seven borings: • The to cations of the borings and the proposed structure are shown on the attached Plot Plan, Plate 1 . We obtained soil samples from the borings and performed labora-. tory tests on representative samples to aid in evaluating their engineering pro- perties. A description of the field and laboratory work and the resulting data• are presented in the Appendix to this report. • Relatively uniform subsoil conditions were encountered in our ex= plorations. The site is underlain by approximately six to eight feet of im- ` ported fill consisting of medium dense brown silty sand with some. gravel The .: '= native soils underlying the fill consist of alluvial deposits of stratified sands, and silty sands. Directly.underlying the fill there-is a-two-to-three -`.. foot thick layer of compressible soft silt with some organics and occasional •lenses of peat. From •depths of approximately 10 to 32 feet- there- is "a loose ' . to medium dense fine sand with some silt and with some.:layers of medium`_sand 'and i= ;.- occasional lenses of silt. From approximately 32 to 45 feet there-. is 1a moderately compressible layer of medium stiff silt. Below approximately 50 feet: there are alternating strata of loose to medium dense s i l ty sands and 'fine to medium;sands The maximum depth of exploration was 64 feet at Borings _1 , . 2 '.and'. 32-,_Groundwater :levels .were approximately 5 feet below the surface at-the time.-:our` :I ;'completed. : This depth corres onds:. --_. . _ ., P P to about'Elevation This site is on a flood plain. We were advised. by'.the: HydraL4:1 _ Division,. Public Works Department.of King County,:: that the..design:,elevation::forjl-':: = a -100-year flood is 21 .8 feet. _ :_ Garfield Transfer Company June 28, 1917 Page DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING The ground surface in the building area is at approximately Elevation 16. The planned finish surface of the slab-on-grade floor is about Elevation 22 and that of the exterior paved area is about Elevation 18. No additional -='"site preparation is necessary prior to placing additional . 'fill , provided the site conditions remain unchanged from those at the time of our investigation. Select fill for support of the floor slab or pavement should be a - clean sand or mixture of sand and gravel essentially free from organic matter • c - , or debris. The maximum particle size should be 4 inches. No more than 5 : of that portion of the soil smaller. than3/4" should pass the No. 200 sieve. Fill to support the floor slab should be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum density. In this report, maximum density refers to the maximum dry density for the ma- terial as determined by the Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557) method. Grading should be arranged so that slopes are away from the building and to a storm drain system. ' - PRELOAD FILL AND SITE SETTLEMENTS - - Moderately compressible soils are present and we recommend the fill - :. for the floor slab be placed and allowed to compress the underlying soils be- fore:constructing the building. - We calculate:,that five feet of fill placed to support the floor slab will undergo a total settlement of approximately 9 four • -. inches. Most of this settlement should occur within the layer of soft silt at a depth of approximately 7 to 10 feet -below the existing ground surface. 3e- cause -.the thickness and compressibility of this soil layer is variable, some differential settlement will probably ,occur.- We estimate differential settle- on'the order of two inches will occur across a distance of about 100 feet • t• under the influence of the slab fill . . We. estimate that settlements will be sub-. complete •i n 4-to 6 weeks. _ We found"no evidence of relatively. thick de osits of highly com- - .._: :: • pr.essible soils. We do not recommend a surcharge fill procedure where fill is • Garfield Transrer Cc)rn}i ri, carp, . placed to a substantially higher elevation than- finished sul rade; ar'id iThen ,../.•c,,-,a' ,moved, In our opinion, our calculated magnitudes of post-construction ' +.•Fi..,,.-, ;..:. ments do not justify a surcharge fill program. - . • . The floor slab fill should be constructed-.to slightly•h'i qhE r•-. than.: .-: '.-- -.':% .. the proposed subgrade elevation to allow for anticipated •sett]emena':'-:;:: 1n•,;a„•f,j.--, ition, we recommend the initial pad fill,. be -extended. e htt_':o a a:s-,.:.-: e at� fu1 1 .hei gfit�_ta��=��:t' l E�`<.3��;4;,-� ; _.i0 feet outside. the building lines: This e =xtenSion is :neCessary'.•fQ-MCOii j,reS • ,rr.,. ' y . soft soils underlying the proposed wall footings.-;` During -constructi'on t.:of'. wall footings this. excess fill would be removed 'and could be used el.sewh tie_ the site. c.r e. on e 'We recommend settlement plates be installed and monitored. 'to:eva.lua t ''. - -- the settlement of the fill . On a building area:of this size,.there is ..a .po _,; ,^.:. bility that there are localized areas where the thickness of compressible soil T-:_--: is greater than that encountered in our explorations. Nine settlement C7ls , • . plates'. should be installed at the locations shown on the Plot Plan: . A sketch,'i-lluis=: trating construction of a typical settlement plate is;presented on Plate -2. : :? Y: :_ The initial riser pipe is generally about four feet lon - g: During fil"l:inj9'.rdr1- .::. ; itional riser- pipes are added so that the top of• . the riser is. always:, at'::Ieast --- :..=x ' ,. about two feet above the fill surface. Settlement plate: locations.::shotr]d,*lie;__..__` :; __ `' -::_-well marked to help protect them from damage from construction equipment. '`-Th : .• settlement plates should be installed and initia,l_. measurem_ent`of`:_elevatio-ns '-�Y�.-'w` ' made before filling .'of the site begins: A se • - - - cond�=rneasurement .shouhd'`be�- de. ; upon completion of the fill , and thereafter at•: ' • _' - inter.`vats:o'f. about. 'one,:We'ek'��:��i: A=,' . three weeks and 'five weeks after the fill' has been placed. `: .'The.height_of`..=_f i ja`•_ =:1' ''. - . •; placed should also be measured. Elevations should be referenced �to..a':.peri ar ent:- "^ bench mark at least 200 feet outside of any area to be filled pi ecisiori _ surveyor's level ,' capable of measuring,to. 1/1000; of a's-afoot;'::should.<'be�.' sd : = .--:.,measureel • u�ed '=to' elevations., r:r Each se t of° le 1 d to 'should uld be-.r eferr�ed• - :rF _ ;�to":us��.for-.al-a�t�i�nc��;�'ar'�fs����_� analysis. We will advise you when settlements are complete:an•d"when::bui ui: rt- - construction ma be j I1,}Q 1 ilc} :` _ ',4- n'.. Garfield Transfer Company � � June 28, 1977 -,Page: S.:, . • FOUNDATN SUPPORT • • : : Satisfactorysupport can be f.. PP obtained using shallow:iso'la'ted-a- - : inuous footings . ., rid -:con _>>,� _: g bearing on the existing fi {''`J - � g 11 or on compacted importe_ d��f"i,1�1.-::'�;�:'�: �'_ '�: . ' Footings founded on the exis - _ ting fi 11•-shouldhave�~a���mi-ninium'��w.idtli�°��.:":� feet"...for �$ r.of.;3" isolated or column footings• and 2.5 "feet::for Conti riuous�<:foo i:n s=.x mit°stresses:and sett' lements :in the':dee er.,s tr ata-..P wer ec omrn - endifo 'n'ot``be-Vfound ed..:bel ow E1 "''' _ evation 16.' �A- ` ` design .bearing, ressure�of�_20 ��- -� -=t�>P Q0�p..fshaul d: .-,., be.used, ,provided .footings are founded at or >_ 'above Elevation•'16.: ~ `:: Footings, founded .on ,imported, compacted.:granular ,f,ill shoulyd,, " "minimum width - _.be. `a_• _ _ .-::.: :;- .of 2:.feet-:for .isolated_:or.:c a .5-f of mn.:faoti ngs _and .1 eef`-for":=corit'i n- = uous '.footings.: A design. bearing ;. :` 9 pressure of 3500 psf may• beaused pr.ov_ 'ed. _ the footings :are founded at or above. Elevation 20 ,.. - � - , .i-....gf'•Compacted�- importedr.'6ra�nu, a'i~,. , fill "for-the support of footings must meet the material,.and- placement requite- "_ ; %`,- yr^?_J ` ments ,for -select fill as described in -the •section-:on:Si to -Pr•eparati on;:•and`.JGr.ad '.•xi;:: .E, --. ing, i.e. , select fill shall =be placed i n 1 ayers .not exceeding.:0. inches`:l oosew' ; . thickness and compacted to 95% of the maximum density . • • _Y.� Al I- interior footin s should ?=-.,>{' - � _ ,_: .:4� _ _ 9 be founded�at�least_�'1�",foot_'be'lbw�ahe: �' • t.-- ` • finished surface of the fl •oor .. .::slab and all exteriorw_'footings a^t lea - iflL r .; - • below _. es••;,„, v •_,_".,_;;''."- .--. _.__"__._--._ -b st adjacent:'grade. -:.:The -above b - - the. 1 owe :., - _..'..,-. .. ,.• -.:.: .�•,: . . :.. :-';�` .:,: -�: � : =�:� - "- -.. - - . . � .. , Baring -pressures:'are;:°fore:: : .��.E.:.�;r�,F - _ tFe��:�d� � _��w - :. - '1 oad 1 us- th . - - ;-:�y:-�;:' ; ;_ ':e-- .:•�: ; __ P ose live loads that will be continuo . ,:. • • usly._appl i ed. �TFie���we.i;�ht:��of•;:: ��;a'< ,i=i.-; - t - he footing - -a and:' ..ti,� - - °the - - ba f' - ck i- 1 1 ov- -over:It - - t-m-_ a `b_ ne 1- - .. - , _ 9. The": ,. 1'owab,,,--bear. :n` . r" s sur - es•may �`Pbe ,Y i inc reased rea _ s - - �b - 3`-f - or ,:. t s: Y / tot al n' l�oa ==- .�;,� . 9 c]udng',=�wi�n'd� an"d; ��Y..: ,�' ;. .: .� .•-. .:.-. -' see - -- -- smic. forces. We - - - •:U��"=�.�.�.. �' f.,;,:' ' • .-recommend all footing .loc•ations:.::be:•probed_•by.:an": exper-,ie`oci.,: � F - :inspector. Loose soils should be•:removed• and-replaced'-with,::.soil :compac`t• ed�,to A"`• z: •• - 95% of its maximum dry• _ density. Please call.- us :_if .: - • "`• `k'i`'"_ - , . _ there �are� � uest-ion"`:��-:�:-...�h:-:<�: ::.�,. in the suitability - - - 9 of bearingsoils- ._- encountered` duri�n °'�-=������=���'«_'�:'`Y y=:construction: ��� -�:- 0.,::_;. Later al -f orces.' r - c s.e f_ ran - 1 W1 nd -:': -or s ei sm'_ c loadin �-_: sistance- v- ao i r ��� 1. _P sir,pf .a nst t .t:. he:���>. bur' t o P of;-foo . t�i n� s`'�=an' 1,-� g d gib �:fr� ctro► ... :-:on. the. baseof- footings �"�ns F . g or convention - _ al shall ��` - ,- 9 , -an-�equi;va-leiit�`��f'hu`:i,dY�� -�,< _-p ssure of�200. pounds - - �"` ` per cu :},. _ .cub foot may.:b e- �us e d. - Y: •'t� c a cr' _ a- _ �ass. ue`-` s to nc e. T hi . LLB• :y• ,nL.4 ? s v - - ue:assume assumes. that footings '.,�,. - 3=: - .. -. bur�i�ed�`.i,n '�o� -s c ni~`acted �pack�f -�` - "' at . _ .f. ea st.:a t2 fe et e tb e to- w,th e st - 'acent� - J 'rade. :.,: 9 ;We:'recom' _ mend :aiia,t::''a-teo�effi=icf`� = u;:�� - ' Garfiel4 Transfer Company duni: Pa,:.• i• - - " of friction of 0.5 be used to calculate the friction -force between the of footings and foundation soils. These values. do not inciude a safety eetoe, An appropriate safety factor should be selected by the structural engine,..,r We recommend a safety factor of at least 1 .5. t•7,- • SLAB ON GRADE FLOOR After completion of site preparation and_allowing_the floor s1:11% ii I 1 to settle, the subsoils should provide adequate support for the slabeon-'-grade floor. We recommend that the slab be designed based on a -subgrade modulus ofl f 80 pounds per square inch per inch. • To reduce the tendency for differential settlement and crack ng be- . tween the floor slab and footings, the floor slab should be reinforced dnd structurally continuous with the footings. . Provided the floor subgrade fill • „ • . is relatively free of fines, as recommended, the usual capillary break ean be omitted. There should be a vapor barrier beneath the slab. If desired, a 2-• inch layer of sand may be placed over the vapor barrier to protect it and to provide- : : - drainage and improve curing of the concrete: ,Le - SETTLEMENT BEHAVIOR • - Upon completion of the recommended. program for:-alloWing the Pad fi 1 1 , . . - to settle prior to constructing the building, we estimate settlement due to the - . . weight of the floor slab at a total live -,load of '250 psf •would be about 2 inches , - : : near the center of.the building and 1 :Inch around the perimeter of the building. - - If the stiffening effect of the structural connection between the floor slab - t and column footings is ignored, the computed settlement:of the:-footings 1 1 . inch This settlement is based on a column 'load of 'H kips'. Real di f 1 ei ent i al settlements :shoUltr.be:less and we eXpett,,,Oat_.the 'riskOf'-'detrimental di Iferen7 teal settlements in the building is small If Your building sequence 1)E:1-n1i ts t differential settlement between the building footimis and floor- slab cou'd be . I, • r' z• - • ::.• , further minimized by-delaying floor. slab construction •;until: after the full column dead loads are in place. We estimate differential settlements across the slab will be on the • order of 1/2 inch in 50 feet. The majority of the settlements should occur- ' • - - • • Garfield Transfer Company June .'. , ;(i;, • in a few weeks after placing the loads. ; PAVEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : _ : The 'existing 7 to 8 feet of fill covering the site should:^prov i do - ;. ;:.-,an adequate subgrade for the proposed pavement. In pavement areas :we '.re�.o,mi end ''�: - the subgrade be prepared by conditioning the :soil to a moisture content: suit.- Y able for compaction and then compacting the. upper 6" inches: to a..densi`ty:-of`.!)5 .. ' , - of_.the-maximum-determined by the Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557) procediiie,. Our .recommended pavement thickness design in truck traffic- areas .i _ _ :. .3_ inches of asphaltic concrete over 8 inches of crushed rock base. course': For,'`;- ;. parking areas for light passenger vehicles, a 2 inch asphalt and 4-:,inc h hose _F'- - course design should be adequate. Pavement subgrades should be sloped to: .drain so that water does not become trapped in the base coarse: .. Special care is - -. . necessary at the edges of catch basins. The junction between the pavement and the catch basin should be carefully leveled and sealed _so that:minor':'flow5 ' ' over the pavement go into the basin and not into the base :coarse.:,..',Any, pavement :•"-.: i ' cracks should be immediately sealed to prevent infiltration of. surface '.ld t:er. ,- ;: . Water from the roof drains and catch basins should be carried 'tiway :: .. ,'-n{,' _ -- from paved areas and discharged. into a -storm-drain system: Percolat�i-on-o: .wa-tm • into the ground does not appear feasible and may be. harmful to pavement,-:Support...„:,; '_>- : z ` : Please contact us if we may make any:;•_add:i tional -comments regard`i'nq:'the _; ` conclusions and recommendations- presented in this.:report; y:-.;:,;'; _ ,= a�, -. ;':- LI. !I Yours ver truh _ . - 4: '•� �i ROGER LOWE ASSOCIATES = ' . — ., • • . . /icy ..z* - 's ! . - - ;: •LLB •,� � • 'rS. � \l"•: • •.;•.< 400-E Br Jack M. Hogan,: Senior Er?i�ine _ S i. ' _ Q � p A - o iar y ,,, i. .9 153oe 4;4: rrt J . :. -.1 ,t,c. C;61144- --., ...-.:.. .__,:::::4;;•.3.7t:-.;:.",;,i:-::::-:::, .,::,,:i b DtiAI Ronald E. Bur.kriaiii, AssUCiate " REB/JMH/1s -. 4 copies submitted GARFIELD TRANSFER COMPANY PLATE 1 - 4 • t _ COVERED 1 � LOADING 6 DOCK I 2+ kl OFFICE _ iu AREA I • . REPAIR - • - . _ SHOP i i.01 4 PROPOSED WAREHOUSE 1 ' 1 • 3000 'F TOM +5 - • S.E. 180TH ST. 3 o - - PROPERTY LINE 0o J4-1 1 KEY. E:i> Y • ® 1 1 TEST BORING NUMBER & LOCATION /.1B BORING LOCATION FROM PREVIOUS — REFERENCE: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN. ivySTUDY BY OTTERS UNDATED, PROVIDED BY 0 25 50 75 100 150 MR. DON ORAZEM SCALE IN FEET ® RECOMMENDED SETTLEMENT PLATE LOCATION • _ I n i•lMilE lL o 9_T __ aa gene m - . f I. • Garfield Transfer C";,.i.:Jny June 28, 19if Plate 2 • .i}•:.:,,.„,,.,...r....:...:7.... ..i.:._ .._....:,, •,,:. , ::,.. _ : , • 1' .I • _ . . . . . . . :::..- :::::.:-,.., -:::::: ;:.1;:-; ,:..,.... ::: . , ... ..." ,:: . : - • . _. . 1'_o" I , . 1 — — — — : ± - - 1 , I j ADD COUPLING (S) AND RISER PIPE (S) r • AS REQUIRED DURING FILLING TO MAIN— i i TA IN TOP OF RISER PIPE AT LEAST 1 TO i. 2 FEET ABOVE TOP OF FILL • - INITIAL . -'=• JJ{ • RISER PIPE 2" DIAM. BLACK IRON e r;; �s� PIPE, THREAD BOTH ENDS• . , r • , r , 2 LAYERS - . • - • 2' X 2' X 3/4" - ' . ': EXISTING. . .: ' PLYWOOD r 2" X 5-1/2" BLACK. IRON _-::.1 : �;.GROUND SURFACE. ' r FLOOR FLANGE \ SAND LEVELING PAD. IF REQUIRED 5 BOLTS REQUIRED, -. :i . - • -,- , WA�5HERS EACH BOLT • . • NOT TO SCALE f . . -... W.ttfCB, A--n1,4}71= eAtetoe-ueo..5rk-le•. 8 .._- _._ ...._ _.__ -..... i ' LLD EXPLORATION AND ! PROPOSE[) GI\DF [LLb ;; ., r: RENTord �aAs[1ii;{_; :i NOT GOOD MICROFILM COPY • FIELD EXPLORATION Subsurface conditions were explored by drilling 7. hor iu ;s. rl,i :: • borings were drilled to a depth of 64 feet and four borings were made to ,, depth of 19 feet. All borings were drilled using A truck .mounted c;ont i nr;'..w, flight hollow stem auger. The drilling was continuously logged by our representative who o amined and classified the materials recovered, evaluated the drilling pr•oores s I' and other drilling behavior indicating variations in soil conditions, and lected intervals for obtaining representative soil samples. Samples were cia•,:,- ified in accordance with the Unified System which is described in Plate A-- i . The exploration logs as presenter) on Plates A-2 through A--i1 ,:re modified from the field logs to reflect the additional information from li)boc;i- • tory testing. -. • Relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained using eit.hic a inch outside diameter heavy duty sampler with brass liner rings or a 3-inch out -- side diameter thin-walled tube. The heavy duty sampler consists of a barrel which is split and can be disassembled for removal of the sample. The ampler was driven with a 140 pound hammer falling a distance of 30 inches. The t.hin- walled tube samples were obtained by pushing the tube with the hydraulic pu il- . down on the drill rig. The length of sample driven or pushed, sample condition and recovery, and the resistance to driving are noted on the exploration logs ' adjacent to the sampling notation. . All samples were sealed to prevent ma i s r,c:r , l T, labeled and t ; ;.•,;, ;, .to our, laboratory for testing. LABORATORY TESTING The samples were examined. in our laboratory and representative ,;nt1e • ' were selected for moisture/density determination, dire.ct shear testing:; end ci;n•- solidation testing. The moisture and. density data. are present:ed adiacent to • - -1 1:•.- UNIFIED SOIL. CL ASS IFI CAT+.,IN :::‘11-E!,.• I-' • I, .....______. ____..... . _ . . I , MAJOR DIVISIONS : L.r I. ;• F..iI-, i DESCRIPTIONS _......, — ' ______._.;. ..__..............., GRAVEL ; • • {, . , AND I CLEAN GRAVE LS ' . . .COARSE • -i I ' GRAVELLY 1 r: ..., 1.33 NI; 3 L'33'.3 i GRAINED SOILS C;iI• ;, • •...:. ;::•1,..;•;,•:,, ;:.;,:- ,..:, ;:. - . I SOILS ; L -------r----.--------7-f-------INOT CO i GRAVES I C M I • I,.....;,t :•..,...:, -; -, I :1 (.:(•;.;,.; ;.; 1 —i-WITH FINES _MICROFILM COPY ' c;,,3,4 .:3:3 3,-,I, ,1,333 AP;3,3If I ,.; • .. •, SA ND - ---I. • _..1..___ .. • I AND I - SW et:!; ,,4;•;;;.. ;.,.;.:,' .;.:..,...., rA,..,;.,.,.. , ' ' • • CLEAN SANDS I ;.:cr.,. .;, 1.;;,•1;;... . • I.: • . - SANDY SOILS ; • I t'"E,.! ,:r,NO r lUf .,,,' •''' . . i • !,1,1 •;111:4 !.-.. . I 1 SP • 1.,:.:Y A..3 I'3 ....A.33,. L I l'It.i: Oil I,i,i INC•• . . .- . — -• — L • „,...'-;'„th., :v..t;r.,, r- - SANDS _ 1 WITH FINES - ' ' •• 5M ' •:.,:..rr :-.0171., ',ANL;1.1;! :.,i..'111,i'., . '..; .--.--- . . . } F.1.1.:41:41. . 1 Ili f Itif.,3 - . SC 1 ' .' H .. I ML - :;cit••,.:,;.ic...It;‘,.. Nil,VI HY f Icir 5,11.1i;;. Ini.1.-r;;KIR, ..;It.i-r CO E.i ,I Y f II& . • FINE I SILTS . . •,li rt.AYri SILT'.,II `.•A Ii•;11i . ,. . GRAINED AND , LIQUID LIMIT .. ' LESS SOILS CLAYS THAN 50 I 1,4,.,., .3.:3,...,:,-.3if L3.b., •33 NE 3,13.1,.; . . • CL I ' . • ;;.1,,r1r.:;,-, 3:13,..!Li Y il:, ,,.:..i.:',:it I',e.;0".,'"..,,f,It.,•.i.r.1..11.A;Y:it. 1 . . I I , . - . .OL ! . " .-... . I ITV1H SILTS 1 !4A3 I 31,1_3.,.IN, 3-..N.0 I.,, -.13ry!,on.. • ;.•..• 730,',I50-e. 1 LIQUID LIMIT . • • AND 1 • GREATER • CH - -• -. 113:3,t,,4NIL-ci..Avs r;.t NIA.1-ii•S:13:11Y THAN 50 . , IA': r I.ATL: • • CLAYS • , . . OH . • li,,..W.t.. CIP,S 0. i,,,J il DI 1;III(i. . .1,.].:11r.:1 IS, l.01ii,... SALIS .• • . ' . PT . ;,,,,;. 31333.1331'.„ 1,1411' "L•31‘.WI IN IIIL.11 . . • . HIGHLY • ORGANIC SOILS • . i--..•;.1,..:;,-;::;Ins • . . . . , NUI1E 1 ,II, .),f4ial INDILA IL 11133iI,i,,i,li ':,,e3ii. Ll.k13 IC:Ohl-I .. -- • . , . , . . • . . KEY TO SAMPLE DATA - • • . . . . . • • . . . . • • . ,. . _ ' 5 2 I . . . . . -•• •. 1 2 . 91.7 I 35 - ..*— , BLOWS REQUIRED. TO DRIVE •. ; , . . . - SAMPLER •12 INCHES WITH . • DRY DENSITY -(PCF) 14C.) LE .• HAMMER': MAXIMUM, . • . , . , . . • \. STROKE 30 INCHES. cMOISTURE CONTENT, 04 OF DRY DENSITY) N, - ' (P INDICATES PliSHED) .• . • • . --J.- I\.\ D---EPTH OR ELEVATION (FEET) . - - • . . . . . -• . . . . . . • .. • , .. ,-, . . . ' SAMPLE RECOVERY - - --- SAMPLER 'TYPE ---- --.-,•,• '' I'. GR.APH/C....ILL; • .. ,,.- ,.., ., . , . • . . . . • . . • . . :. LETTER SYMBOL. FOR . '•• - ' •I I UNDISTURBED ' HD —' 3 •INCH SPLIT - i • SO.I L TYPE • . . z . • TUBE SAMPLER . . . . DI STURBED TW 7.,3, INCH' THIN WALL - •, . . I ! DISTINCT 'CONTACT ' . . . • . . .. —.,. . • SAMPLER ' .BETWEEN. SOIL. STRATA. • ...., . ,-...::;••:':a • . ' -I-•;•.: •NO RECOVERY SPT — 2 INCH SPLIT - TUBE SAMPLER • . . GRADUAL .CHANGE : . • ,. . . . • ., . ..:.,,, BETWEEN SOIL STRATA ' : • .. , C 7 ROCK CORE . . . . . , B — BULK DISTURBED ' '. ;: ' Est.IT TOM OF DURING .. . .. SAMPLE . • ............ .. . ROE LOW SOCIFITES UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM R E ;-',S . AND KEY -TO 'SAMPLE DATA• Garfield Transfer Company dungy ; , the sample notations on the borings logs. The 8 strain-controlled direct shear tests were performed on full ./ . submerged and consolidated samples. The direct shear test results are pr-. . , sented on Plate A-12. Consolidation characteristics were evaluated by performing 2 sl ,:mdord one dimensional stress-control led consolidation tests . These results :.rr!' :Jit) i it on Plate A-13. . Garfield Transfer - ,I,c,tly . Elf<:N; !1P�f. i • DEPTH DRY BLOWS . - IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER GRAPHIC • FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION 0 _ • - ' SM BROWN S1LTY. ;1Ai[) WI 1'1 t :>GME= rR;'.vE`!_ ( 1(., DENSE, MIST ) (FILL) . 5.-.. W 1 FR. LEVEL it/R I I•IG-,,R I1_t_.I NG. - - }- t. 6 11111 _. .. i 186. 1 21 .2 TW. HROWN. SII._T vJl TI-1 SOME t;r�GAN1C` (v.; ;r i , Ms;1 I i' PUSH Hill 10— i . . 1111/ SP 9 SM— GRAY SILTY l`I i aE SAND (`-.)OSE. WC; ) i, • • -�-• ' 15 • . . . ; _•, . • 27.2 94.0 17 11111. 1: . . 58 .IIIII t 20— + CHANGING TO MEDIUM SANG WITH SC NI-. 1 .:`,t [ ; t I • t • FINE SAND AND LENSES OF _•11_T" (M; l: IUM : L ) '. - j tl ,- 33 III ! . - 1 , . 25— - • • • • • • II • • 57 `\\ (DENSE) } i:.. GRA'I' SILT WITH - ;ME SAt;aC AND SII[=;_! ERtN(,Mr,f•I!Y-.:1 1� \ (M[ GIUM .. TI[ I WET) j • ' 40—m . , . . i L. r ! R�MER L,iIi E SOC IT S I t C,r OF EXPLORATION , - , ,e•,„. • - ,..:,•,,, .,,- I ' •-•••••. , I,.. 6, IUI - .. N.)R I Ni..-1 i;';' ,‘: •.1: ! ......... ....... DEPTH DRY BLOWS IN MOISTURE 'DENSITY PER GRAPHIC I • „. . -FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT L OG Si):t. DESCFi i 1..'T 101,1 ,. •• ', „ 1 ' -• • 40 34. 1 81 .9 PUf SI-W . „ : 45--- -- . ChiANG I NG 1"C) SANDY .--;li....r _ ' • . • so— r............?' TRACE OF ORGAN'CS: • , . . . „. 1 - „. . , • , .., . - - SM GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH A Tr,'r.r..:.'. (LOOSE, WET) • 1 13 11111 • . , , • , , , • • 1 ,23. 1 . . • • 60— . (MEDIUM 'DENSE) • • ., ,,.. . .• .. ,, , - -..,- • . . _ • " -.., _- : .•--,:-•-:‘- '''' 'I • .. _ BORING TERMINATED AT 84.0' . , ON 6/10/77 _ : , , I • , . . , ,_• . .„. . ,.-. .- --. • ,:-',.:-,-2.:::::..;•21.. "-;:;:.:-..•-„.,,,,,, ,,,,,;.,,-...-, ;,;,..„.!. ?i• : •••••-,- .,..,, , : •. '.-;,,.,--, ,•:::-..y:-:::.. --„:,.„,--,-:. :,-,-,;:,,,,::::izl'.-=‘,:::;;:;f:':4.,"',.-;.',:,,:,'-.•_.,', : • ,• , :.:,: • '. •,' '''...:':,:::•• : ' '• • ,,..,,:, ''.-: -: - - , , . . • , - ...,. - , . - " . • , .';'.', '• . F - -1 • . , .f.',. : ' '-'; 1: • ........ ' . _....._____ 1 FICIGEF1 L01146 FISSOCIATES I , - LOG OF EXPLORATit)N • . . • ...... . • i • 1 Garfield Transfer Comoany ,lunP 2`.1, 1977 PlatQ_ A-.1 I - . . .._ , BOR1N2 TWO ,. ' . . .., ' •. , DEPTH DRY BLOWS IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER GRAPHIC FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION . ' .. t I r 0 , SM RROWN SILTY SAND WITH SOME, GRAVEL (mEDI.um - , I DENSE, MOIST) (F ILL) •- i WATER LEVEL DUR I NG DR ILL I NG 6-7 ' - - _ . . . 11111 . , .. . 54. 1 65.9 TW ML BROWN SILT WITH SOME ORGANICS (VERY SOFT. ;:1--- PUSH 1 7. WET) ' ' • ',.. -.•- , -- - 79.2 53. 1. 8 HI SP GRAY FINE SAND WITH A TFRACE OF-SILT (I Or/SF ' WET ) - • • .- . . 1 •. . 1 • — 1 .. - 15--.1 S S (MEDIUM DENSE) • . . , 4 27 .N.N. 1 , - , . , ...X... 20 CHANGING TO MEDIUM ,SAND -(DENSE-)- 22.2 97.8 50 11111 . - . I. . . . . . . , ., .. -:;••• , 25 .„, , . . . .. . . . • . , [ 26.4 94.511111 88 . , 1 30-1 , . , . ,,, _,.. :,. _1..,,, .:_,__,,,,,,..-„,z, -,-,.,:•:, -,yZ-z-----`'`f-=',,'''',"'..-4----:f--',',2',/-t•'--.'"3-.N'-' : , . , , • . , • . ._ - , , , „ I I , M. ' 1. GRAY SILT WITH A TRACE.'OF 'SHELL'FRAGMENTS (MEDIUM STIFF, WET) 35_1. , ' . i I r,i, ,T,,,,, II , . CHANGING TM MEDIUM SAND WITH SOME 'S IL T • - 40-1 , ROGER LEVIA FISSMCIRTES I —..:G OF EXPLORATION . . , , • , Garfield ,::,.-ansfor Lr - anv OunP 28, P;77 Plate A .....-..-....--.7.-..'-.. ....---. - .........---..:".... 1 I BORING TWO (Continued)I. . • ..i . DEPTH DRY . F3LOWS • • is , IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER GRAPHIC FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION 1".• — i. • . 40---7"---, ------7— • . I I i , I , 1 i . I • . SP GRAY MEDIUM SAND WITH A TRACE OF SILT • i .• . . ‘1 25 (MEr_)I UM DENS. , W!.:..-1—) . .i . . . i I . , 615 --i . . , • '• . .,. . • . . . . .. . . • ! i . ... • - . . i I \ \ . . 1 I 39 • • I 1 • ' . • I . SOME SHELL FRAGMENTS .- . . . . ,. 50 ----4, I, . • . ,. • . . , I . . .• . . , . . • . ! . 1 • • ! I . . . . . . . I 28.5 I 93.2 23 IIII! .• . ,• . I I . 55 --- - . _ . . ..; . ' . . .. . •, . . . . •.- . ...2 , ., • . . . „ . .. .. . . .. . . .11111 . i . 60 —I .•.. .- . • . I • . ... I • ' . . . I '. . .• .. . " . . . , „ • - . , - I - ' 25 : . . . . .•- . .. . F3OR I NG TERMINATED 'AT 64:0' . . . , ON 6/10/77 . . , • . . . . , . . . . . . . , - . .. . . — . --r. . : , . .-I -• . * • • . - __. , • . • — . . _ . , . . _ . . , . .... . . • . . . _ ,.,... . • ....--.,.. .„ , ...„,.,....... •••,,,,,,,,, — . . .. , ,.,.,.. ... ., •. .. . , .. .... • .. • - . . . ,. . .. . . . • • • 1 • . . • - . . .:. . . . . . • . , . , . , . • . . 1 . • . . , . . . • • . . , . . . • . ' .. . 1 • . . ; • • . • . . • ti • . . . • • .,.. . , . .. •. . i . . • i. . • i- .., .— . . *. • I Flfl.C.E.S L 47 k°. P 7 7.-;'•in''''.*:r°nir i7:-.:,I.G I • G OF EXPLORATION . 1 . . . . . ___ .. . . .. .. . . Garfield j f a+)sfer �r7r; ,a 13 f i.Ine r"' )c F i77 ate a •• i. , : BORING THREE " DEPTH DRY SLOWS IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER GRAPHIC FEET CONTENT (PCP") FOOT LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION . , • 0 E r I SM BROWN SILTY SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (FILL) f i • 14 I1111 i WATER LEVEL DURING DRILLING • 1 TW ML BROWN SILT WITH SOME ORGANICS (SOFT, MOIST) PUSH `� . 1(I ,." ..' SP DARK GRAY FINE SAND WITH SOME SILT (LOOSE. 10 ` WET) 15 --1 CHANGING-TU MEDIUM SAND (MEDIUM DENSE) 22 \`\ • 22.4 1 102.0 42 In ?_0 • , .. ALTERNATING LAYERS" OF FINE SAND, MEDIUM • 16 HID .' SAND AND.LENSES OF SILT . . . • 25— • • • • • 28.2 92.25 10 llll I 70. 50.1 ML ._ GRAY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL LENSES OF SAND (MEDIUM STIFF. WET) I • 35-1 • i { • • 1 CHANGING TO SANDY SILT (LOOSE) 4 0 ter^► . ROGER LOW fS.' QC!PTES • •')G OF EXPLORATION . . . Garfield T"ansfer r.:0.npar.,,v june 2:;.), 1977 . 1 • . - . • BORING THREE (Continued) • 1 . . ';---- , . ., . , . .. . • • . , , . DEPTH DRY a LOWS . . - . • -- . . ..• . . ... . , • . , IN . MOISTURE DENSITY PER GRAPHIC FEET CONTENT (Pcr7) rooT LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION 40 T_________.... . . . • . , I . I . . . s... . . -.1 . , • ' i I CHAtsIG I f,JG TO SILTY FINE SAND (MEDIUM 1DEJ E)...::.:..:,i..,',.: . • ! I i . . . • . ; 21 .8 I 101 .3! 28 DPI - . .... - . .. . . - • . . ...„ . 1 1 . . .-,.•. . . .., i, i , •• ' 2 -4 5 .....4 ' - . . . - .. . . - • ' - " .- • . - . .' . I , . . • , , . HID . . _._ ', . • • • i I i 1 . • SP .0iGt.PATY)- FINE SAND WITH SOME SILT (MEDIUM 'DENSE; • . '.'::::.i"' _ . . • . . , I . :-• I ! • . . • . .,. ..• - , . . . . . 50. . . .. ... • . I • I I . . .. . . r .. - , . , • i - . .` ' i ! 1 " . . . . .. . LOOSE • ' , . . . 55 _ • ' - t_I I . • I I . : • . . . . .. •.: - - . -- . . - • • • - - - • •• . . .. .. .t., 2_ . . - ' I • ' -- • .: - =--...- - - ., . ! ' - ' • . ! - • • . • 60--I (.1M.F SHELL FRAGMENTS AND. LENSES:OF .SILT I . (MEDIUM DENSE) • . - .„ ,.. - -,- . _ . . . . '• . --- ., , . - ,., - '. • :.:--,', , . . I I . . • . . , . 1 " • ' ..„ . , .. . ,, . ......,, . . i 22.9 I 103.3 I 25 11111 . _ ,. .. .....:,.....,.. -. — •. , '. . 4 • . . ., ..- . . . ......-'-.. ..- ,... . .. . • , 651 • ' . . - .. .. . _ . ,. • :.,:),•-•. . . .. . . • . " -..,-- r?..'. . . . . FIRING TERMINATED AT 64.0! ' . • :. Y - ' — '-':' ,- . . ON 6/13/77 . _ . . . . . • . . 1.. .-._•... , • - - • . - , ..„,.. . . „ . . ,„ , _ . , .•..., • ,_..: ,.._,.., .,....., . ...„ .. . . . • . .. . . . , • . . . . • .. -.. ..t . • .• • t . . .. •. t• ... • . • ' . . . ...• .•.•• . , ,,.. . . -.. . ..• . , 1- . i . . . . .... • • . . . , ,. • • , • • . . . . • . . . . • . • . . , . . , • . • '• - '' - ' - -- -• ' - • • . ' . • — . ,. ,-,,, . ., • . . . . I. , . • . . . . . . • ' . • , . t . . . . . . . . . • • • -. . . ! • - • . • ' • . • • - . I . • ' !-- . ............_ . . - , ;:r-T. r..r" 7'..,•."..17,745 )G OF EXPLORATION i . • Garfield IYtlt' sf ri BORING FOUR • • • DEPTH DRY BLOWS IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER GRAPHIC •• FEET CONTENT !PCF) FOOT LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION f 0 I 1 -- I. 1 SM BROWN SILTY SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (FILL) i • H H H • - i • E i WATER LEVEL DURING DRILLING • t • i 86.0 1 69.2 Tw ML MOTTLED• GRAY AND BROWN SILT WITH SOME FINE, PUSH i SAND AND ORGANICS I CS (SOFT, WET). 10 - . I1 SP BLACK FINE SAND (LOOSE, WET) 35.5 81.2 TW • 28.7 87.0 PUSH-E 15 - 011 CHANGING TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SOME LAYERS OF FINE SAND AND LENSES OF SILT (MEDIUM DE:1SE) .. • 20.9 1102.0 36 6113E - , 20- BORING TERMINATED AT 19.0' • ON 6/13/77 ` • • • • • • • • ROGER LO ASSOCIATES • .OG OF EXPLORATION ;arf e?d Transfer Loraanv June 1977 Plat.r A-9 . . [------ BORING FIVE . • DEPTH DRY PLOWS IN MOISTURE DEN'iITY PER GRAPHIC . . • '.•FEET CONTENT • (PCF)- `FOOT LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION '.' ' SM BROWN SILTY SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL. (MEDIUM • ' I DENSE) (FILL) i •'t i • • J j + , \� WATER LEVEL- DURING DRILLING--- . r 7J•(? 1 52.6 Tk I ML BROWN SILT WITH A TRACE OF ORGANICS (SOFT, i PUSH I WET) 10 = I SP DARK GRAY SILTY FINE SAND (LOOSE, WET) 33.6 82.3 16 Hill . . . . _ 15 = . CHANGING TO MEDIUM SAND WITH A_TRACE OF ;IL'1 I 22 ,,�\; , (MEDIUM DENSE) • 2 0 —' . BORING TERMINATED AT 19.0' • • ON 6/13/77 • 9 . I qq . Y . Fl :� tin I.' ri,d J I `• �'�`'�`�'���°����� )G OF EXPLORATION i i:IYfIE : i _ icfPr i, _ _ .._._ June 1' - r f1_ . _ f 1 ---- • s BORING. ___ IX 1 I• DEPTH DR'( SLOWS i I• IN MOISTURE p(;!J:,I'T'Y PEP GRAPHIC 1•' - FEET CONTENT (F'CF)) FOOT LOG SO!L DESCRIPTION 0 __--I SMI DROWN SILT'( SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL. (MEDIUM r1DENSE, MOIST) (TILL) . I i I \: WATER LEVEL DURII.IG DRILLING i 11 i• __ CR. 6 I 63.7 TW ML MOTTLED GRAY AND BROWN SILT WITH A TRACE I 96.0 46.4 PUSH p 111 7 S (SOFT, �_ I I ! � ,/ OF ORGANICS C ,..C.F•T, WET) SP GRAY -FINE SAND WITH SOME SILT (MED(UM DENSE. WET) IIUI 27. , ^5.5 =5 35 • 3 ie111 CHANGING TO MEDIUM SAND WITH OCCASIONAL =-?L i 1 iNILENSES AND D TRACE OF ORGANICS ! 20 -1 POP 1 N(i TERMINATED AT 19.0 FEET ON 6/1 3/77 •• ! ? 1 { . i I 1 1 i I i i i mi”....7z k Lc!, N,-,,r:,7 .,,s. 11 T °F:, I )G OFEXPLORATION S_�_ i ._ . .... Garfiell Transfer Company Junt',. '' 1977 Plate .r-y-il . .. . . - - . , BORING SEVLN . . • . . • . . . . . , . . , . . .. . . . . . • . . ... DEPTH DRY BLOWS . • .. . . . . . . . .,... ! , . . IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER • GRAPHIC • . . . . . . • . . . . . , FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT LOG • SOIL DESCRIPTION • • : 0-1— I - •. - • - .' ., . SM 13RO'k!N SILTY SAND •WITH SOME:GRAVEL 7(MEDIUM." DENSE, MOIST) .(FILL) .•, - . . , _. .-. ..,. -•. . . . . . . . .• . . . . . . , . .•.._ ..;, , . • . .. . .. • . . . . ,_ . . •, . . W ' • 7 ATER LFVEL DURING DRILLING .:- ," • ' - • : — . _ • , . . . : • • . 30.8 85.7 TW . . . . - ' . , . . 93.9 PUSH 1111111 MOTTLED GRAY AND'BROWN SILT WITH SOME. 10 . ' ORGANICS (SOFT, WET) • . . — •-. • SP GRAY FINE SAND WITH SOME SILT. (MEDIUM DENSE • . . WET) • ...• , . \N 22 X,‘• • . . • • • ' , • . 15 "-- • . ... ,. • . .., . . . .. , • , . . ._ , .. . . .,• ..- ., .,- •, . . ' • 31.6 88. 1 28 11111 CHANGING TO- MEDIUM SAND . • . . .. . - . . . - • ' :•--••::. --. - . . 20 --1 . . • BOR I IsIG TERMINATED AT. 19.0' . • .• . • .- ON 6/13/77 - _ ,....- ‘: .— •• ' , : - - -, '. .' .- . . . , • . - - • - --.••-•: • . • : . . -... .. : • . • . . . . . • .._:, . . . . . . „ . . . . . . . _ . . . . ,- —..-. .. • , • .- • _. ... : . . ... .. . _ -. ..-.-.. • -..: ' • - — • — • ' - . . ,• . . . . . • . . , . ,- . . . . . • . . . . • . ' • • • • „. . . . - .. .. , . - . ,-.- - - . • -.. - , .,••.,... . • .- , _. . • . . • , . • . • . • .. , .. . . _ , -- --•- ' . ... - . -, .• ?;•:' • . • . .--- •,.._. . ... . . . , .. . . . . . . • . .. , • - . • . . . . . . , . .. . . . . , .. _ . . ... . ..„ . .. , ,, . .., ... .. ,.•-• . . , . . . . . . . . • , . . . . .. , . . .. . ' • . .• . . , • . , . • .• • " . _. . . • . - • • • , . . . . . .. .. . . . • : • . • . FICCIER LC i' IREMOCIFITES 1 . .0G OF EXPLORATION - . . , i . . , • . . , . , . . ' . . . . • . , . • . . . . . , . , . . ,,,, ( pt.IFT2, i -.- ri'"'N i ;?'.IPI E DEPTH MOISTURE DRY DENS'ITY ' ' -." 1 ' . ' ' . . • . UNT7NT 0 BS/FT2) r ON F I-."-."-----'--'—'----::"7rr `1D167a----'--N I NG • c irl FAR RAT L PRESSURE (IN., ML N. ' - ,7 ,,, , : ,.. ..,TEDSTR.E:.ibliti ,1_,-_,..-, 1 (FT) u . - • c_-... .----,— , .........._________ •...., I •--31 t 1— .. 1 • • 3 , 1 • 1 c 623 10.0 I ' 79 2 53 1. . ,..=.1;'0 -.-, , P. 350 , , , 10. 0 ' • 76.3 1246 3 i ,-, .., , 35.5 : ::.st:) , _,_ . " 623 ,. . 12.5 1 81:2 I % 12.5 ?a.7 87.0 1040 '• •'...'... i • •,. 'r,. ! 7. ' 58.6 63. 7 416 190 210 240 46.41 831 86.0 . , ..,.. , 7. 5 9 7 7, 5 30.8 • 85.7 , 623 • 290 500. ... , 1 520 : • 9-4.9 i , 1040 1 i , , - • : . , . , , „ , . . , , • . , _ • , •-•-' I .--- • . - s'',. ' 4 •:•'4,,o., "., . •":',• •••,;• •, .'•', I i ,A!, :.;"1 • I „ . . • . , . , --i .,... — „ . . , • A • , ,. .. : . , --r- „ . ' . , • . —1 ' '' ' : ,''.'.X'.: ,: -,'•,-.?"" A r ' • ' 7t'',.,-- - ,. :. `. . A- '..: ' ' - , , ' 'A-,' ':; ':,:!, -..--: ' -.5". 4, ':•, : ;• --•',,•••,;,,.:. ';'' ;:•,•-•;•- -•.."•: :,4. ..4 - • -. •',,:,. ,4.- • .. ,'" :' ,--••.,:;':;'1;:!,?;:: --.-: •,.';:•'•-,,.!..1,4'0. ,.' ', ' ', ,- ---' •-.'. .,' ' 4.• ,.. ;' 4`1 '' ' ' • ' 4 - '4 • -* 1 • ' '' • 4 •' •-''‘":" 1 '''• ''' •'• '•'-• • - - '4 .: 41.) , .,,•;' -4: •, -' :,-4: •:, '.'•4'!;'-,,4,.!. :': 4;,';',',.`•'''':; ,',1,1'..4, 1-:.••••'-' :• - ', '!..' ;4••;. •' •!„:'11.1,-.';',',.__.;'i:__,11.-:'.'.'":-',1''''Z'' ;—- '''- •-•:- :•,'-4 -i-',--:',4-;'— '—• : : -- • ' :' :''i'',,,a.'.- : -- ,j5';'::.: .:;'::',. -t;:.'',''"' '"&'''' '' a; — _,,, _.: .--.. : ',..':-':-. ' '''..,..',,I.:,,,---,,-, -4,. 4:'-''.-',.. ..,',:, '.., 1 .R,^4?.•.--,:. '•,;',:','''.,-c '',."..,,,;,, , ' • ,...:1,'`..,, 1 .." 't ' : -...' :, ..! , ',. :. : ,,,-. -., z ,,, .r.: , ,,.,,..,-•::.4 ;,-: ,:,,;..,,,!,-,,,, ,..;,,f?„,-,.,-, .,:".:n: ,„..,:4 r,.. I • *;..• ,,i1._;,....1: , .,;..,; R- RUN r'N 4'3 A TIJRA 3ED sAmt-I_J.-7.s: ,A1 L.:;.:1.....i c.:3 1----;‘..,, 1:- :, ,N, .--, '' ,..- ' • •, ,:,•,AT''''A;-!_•-.:T 2. FATE- ' ' °, ,.,.„,..-,“;,,i : --!' '-',•''.i... -.T.-; '''''' .4 ''.'''%%': ' ' I' !• 11'+ '' ' ' , ' , ..—.......................e... ' ' ' ''.' I. ' iN 1'C''''C: tii 0 T Ei.) T ._F . ., _ _ ,...... -.-- ------ 1'2' ' '''''.::''',.',..i .:.i.:. M'Is. ‘r,-...::::.:.----:—.------........--......— .F'. �t ;IIiy ` ,j111"ii? 6C�, :�-'17 • - -,•,V.i ..:.1.�. .t • I • • .1 .:3 - .., 1 2 • 3 4 • 5 • 10 . 20 -• '' O: •:4Z)- i.'.; i,' ,•, • fI - F i•I • Ii f� I � • i ( �• U 14 _`N - • 16 —. _4_ i _ i - j .. • ': \--1- - I. : 1 -.,: ; . -..' - 1 • , -- `tea ! I .. fi _ _. . . 0 24 ----- I--1- - — -- —- _1= - cn - I " ~ _. .28 _ -- - ► _-- - - - y . • • • ! 4`• • • KEY 6Cl.RING SAMPLE �� MOISTURE .: ^.°' .C'9;;t,' *..,: .. • • ,DUMBER CLASS IFICATION .% , --CONTENT:. =.'D <'ENIT Y-' -- - ( % fiLEIS%FAT- ) .. • S 7,5 4'I_ - OL 75..8 ' '" 52EI;, 'Y - GUES1 La : PISSO '1' C 0 t. .. _I_ I DA T. T 0 tl T.EST..RESULTs.`:-.,:: .'.-. , • ..,•.:•'').,',;,,...i...L.,:!;,'.:,...,•-....:,';,..,.:..I•1•.,_.'i,.,4.•A -;,'.'-..-:-ci..',:c .:::,-,',.''',',.,"..,•';',..-,:.''':'••• •.•,''.; "''''',2".'21-',5•;•...'-''"i•;• •.•'- ., ' '' ' • -- ' ' . , .„ •r,,,"..•!i2";;•4"':::::,:-.•2:g•„,i-l'4?.•1.,:::'-'1,-„,"-,'•'- •••,c''',',..••:+,...;.'.,"'i,: :•?•-.?..,..'„,.'''''':''.,.....", •;:e,..:.''', •••• .•.•••'•,''',:- `'•••• '''T.'•'•'' ',' ' •' - •' -• '..'-:.' r ••:' ••'' ...•',.,..,:.,.,.. ''so :- .•''•'... •., ,,-'.'''•••.,•r••.'-• •, ''.:,''.-•. :.; 1:,T1;'•u,•'-'•••.•,,it'.0,..:',.•.•.':',..,..4.-,•:•-•:fz,,,,-,.:,-Te..,.,.,"••-..;', ..•.'....„..,••-•-";;••.•,';:'••:.•"•',,•'.''.,, .::::' '''''',1'''',,,t,.. `;,,,Is. ..`: .' .**-. ). ''ti.' 4,'''' .:::!+'&;-'!+:1:'*%;,:,,.„ ..^4'f.til''.'"Ing'Lt ..,,-:,';':;L.'„''?'•I'''....„:::,',:',', .,',.. '' ''..•,:,);..,': ri:,..",;,':-..V:!:•.4',1,';i:i:i:l';,-,:;:'1'.'%.:, ',;,::V;ff.q,';',;:,%''''''•,t:44/'', ..'ei,...„ ,,,,i, ::',.r,A701:;47,4 ',..,$1.,4:15 .1''/',. eri! '. '..,:+c"-',-.,:‘._:-.`,"..::`,4:.„ . '!, - ::..,„.,-.„,.,,2,„.... „...,.. .„..,,-...,:,.!-,;;.:.,••;,,,-,.,,.,. :. -..;,... 2,, ,;.,;,,,,;.,i,,... ,`.';',.. :-!"e"...;'::'f.0;;;fk::i.f.-::-';F:33.(li...5 -f,. .::,.4_14"4.i!..-.;:-.• 1; 11.'i4:4;•-,l'.;;;V'71;4i4 .... .:a-'''-'. r..pg:,,,-',.,,,t-e,-... ,-,..:7,,.•:-.!-.., .-.....,, :::F..., -. '-,. -.--,?:.!,-, (A.i.,:-..,-::,,::::,,,....:.;..:,....,,.-I! ,,, ,..!:,.-.,...,, I ':..i,,,,•;„,,i.i.i,-:,,,,.',I.:-.,?;:,,:: :::..):7:e--::,,,Y.:::-_.",..:!-:-v;,,:!.k,,,,: .4.11.,...ii-',A. '::,..',tkt,.;•:,-*--,:.;,..,, ,,,..,c i!,•,111.-,.....:':•*.:,',..,., tyi •••,:.:.-.":-. ',4'.. , :'7K„ .''',!''':-'"',-:.;...'''. „.;`,!:$4,11;t:M.•'''.. )-`-,,'.:1":',.[!'''.,.,-.:: (,:.,,..- : •••"';',' 3,',..'1:',f.:,, '.:;)''',.`;•.'.`i,r'f',•.:i.ri.i.::.';','•:;`,,::::'„:&;':•:•;:,!?;•• :,:Az',1,''f.:!.'''.,,::-: 4.4: -ii".47.:.•.-i•J.,'''.'''P'::,..--:;;.,',,.-v',:-..;4'.„' -,,,',fr.,,-%.,;.,'ITT.:'....!:., .it.z.i•.:.!.....i,:;',7!, : ::::. '. .. '.t1,,,s• ....., . . .....,,,.,',.,,,;?.,,',..,..,,,,,,,,-'',.;-.. - . ,;, „y,....„'..,, ,.,...;-:,..„-z... .1,:,..:::.,....:....,,,..,,,,....Qvg,-..i.),-;.:,:::,.-;',...v'..-,:` - ,.fi,;;k.,„ i:.:.4':',.!:it :.,',.2.!.,:-,:014'.. ',,,,:.,..,-,'...,' p ', '.:,,•,4-.-„,..;',. i. •. ' ,....,;: *• ' ,.'.r:'''-,:::-.,; :.''..' '.- .:, - ,-' ;-.,' '''' ......v:.'.),,.';':•;::•::,'..,.;.-4: 1;T-,....,,!:,i .-.,,,:::-„:::•4ir,.,c...;;,.., :,:',.....,...0,. ;,.„:14.','4'-'!:'-'.., `$.', ' ''''''''''-'..i.V :::-.!..i.••••,',-, lz ' ---... - '-::•;',' :',...'-ft.,...4,45,'"''' '. .•-*:?-e70,31'..?.i,i'' '-.) .':,.[''s'..,'.." :,.' ',.....'' . , •' '' i', ::::',1:..-.'„'-c.,'. ....,-...,..'' ''',`,-..f- ,-.'2,P.',?',..':,"it..f)''....:-..,:i;,'..is.,*,..1„,,-!‘,-,-,2..,..01 .,(,-,?j,.,,'''.:•$:.:',.....,,, ltw,,-.:,.,,.,:..:.,.-.' gii., .,,,:,, .:,, ,,,•.7,..,..A, ,,,.,z,,,?,,., : ,,.,., —.,-.. . . , 2i...,..,:,,,.. , ,,, , , ,.2, , ..... ,.,,.,,, ,, „.,:•,,,,;-„,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„•,,,..-.„,.,,,.:,„:„..,..,:•,„,:,,,,,,,,,„:„..,,,,,,:„.,,„,,,,.„.,...,.,.,::„ ...„.....,2„,•, ...., ..,• ••.,..,-.-:::, :,-... . ,-. :„.:,-,..„ .. ,, , , .: . , ..., :•:;,,,,.,.:,..,..,, • „ • „, .-:.,....,..,;;, , .,..,..:::.•.. „,._, •,.„..f,:._„„.-...,„,:::„.„,,,,,,,:•,„„.: ,-. ...., ..,.,,, ,:,,..... :,.....„....:.,..,),,,,,, • • , •••,•. ,,: ,.., ,,,,......, •„,..„„,. , .,,,„. i „,,,c,:•• ,:'4,:'''',..i', ;'4.v.. '4;.:',',:' '.'....c: '. '7..'.-.;'.;. 7,s..:.',......„,,,,.7...!,..„,:.,'' '.'.,,.' ' _,,,-:,:i,,; . ,,,,,; , ,,‘„ .,. ,.,,,,,,.,, .;,...:,„1:„:.:.,,;:;..',.,,,',.,:.,,i,i , ...,,..5.-...q1:, :. ",,' '..!:, '.0 ' ,,.r.4.,..iv.' ".,.•', ''..'„.:'‘''''';.-:',,". .:'17'' ' ••`-"••,:,..-iiri. •-..-:-1,'•••%.,•••'• •••;.:! -'•!!:•'• .-:.•': -''' •,-6'•••'.•;:' •,,• : -;,-,•,-,„;.,..,;':,:-;r. ••,••:•:'111;C(-'1".''.•' e,.7,•• tttlt ' s2:1-•,,.'• ;''.:', ',....'•-.,:;,:..„,.„:':: ;'„'•:''.'i.,-; "1-•. '",';'":- .>'.....=i:. ' 7:.`:, ,,,i'-:;. fll'',' . ..;:', -„: l'.,"1:i.''.:„.. . ".,.‘jt.,'•'.: ..,...',.:.,.: .•• ','. 'F,'. . ' --..i•z.:::., :,..,"..',/,•.:•:"...':4:,:..-''.&.*'.:c,,,•.,4 -;,. •i,,z,,,, T-,...., ,t...t . ,,,;.i..,,,, 111,......, ..2z.;...,..;.,,,,,...',.,:,:-.,. .,i;-,t,e.'--; -•;:g-, ".. ,;;• -,•:, ...14' ,,,,:;•• ',fis;. .. ;;.!..,,;:;.,...417' ',-..tg'41=,...',`,. P.:•.:!' . ".:'•-•,••. '••'•••,1,;,:•,:.•;•'• '•••••?-f',-`,"';'!'..-..--.',::-.„',.•-';',,•'.:•..,,c , -,' f:,?1,4 :,%, -,.••;:',,,;/•-,''.'::-.'.?;$, '-,--,:.,',,' ,,. -J,,t...,•;.'4',4 ,„,,•:-,1,,,,,i`, •, 1,,;:, ,;0,,,,4 :.,..tt,',il. . -eit'/..',,• Iti..---::,%', ..,,,,„ ei%,1‘, "',,: -,', -??•;1,,, ,',•:.,...',. ,.',,,': .,•••,-;',..".,,,-,' ". ,',';'::'•.:',':•2',,...."':.',7"'.-.'-"' 1.; :::,'',.....,,4Yi,', :,,t'.4.. ,:4:'-',i,. •,;.fr':::,-.2i-,-,'!;;', -',.".•.:,-644,"'...-I.,; ;-;13 ',:., v ';'..'''' -;.1' ,...4 ',.-''' ..i'f.'. .•:, ,'i.-• t',.'-' .,',....'...,',.....;,:r-,...:', .z„.7.;:, ''.',y.... '..,..;.',,..,-;,,-;....,'- ', t I S'f''...4:,".'.',..'..-7,''7,..:;.''',..'.:-;.'., ,' '',: 'ii,'', i';,„'., z.-;,.., •'..tre,;' ,?2`-...I''•''-,'.ek,;.,1, •,',Y.: .'-.':.': '''.::• :'".',-,', `:,:'•„:..,'"?':•1,...' ...,''''''71,,,..';',,‘ '21',,.'•:,•,i•• • ,, ...,', • •', ! .'.,,....-%,',•,';',,;',,,,•."\il:,::,::',.: . :,•:,:,, :. •,:.1'••.,':,,,n,,•, ::,1:.A,•;•,:z::•.,711,,l;.:::',•:;:::, „••:',:;‘',,•'•,,..,, •i •.;:•',:,'••••;'1,-„,.,,1:','',.:.,:,,-'•,',',;:,':.,,'-',..",',:,,:''.g:'.; :.;;,: *;,"i'.;•;',,,..'';", ',,:•,,.•,',.,"..'‘:; ,-„,'•,;•;,•::•,:.,' •,.:::•,:,•••,'''.•':•.•:.••]:•';..;•.•••'":1•',..'-:,' • '.•:‘i,'•'.., ':';''. '•,!1:2.',•'''..'S..:(,','):::::':, ',''':.',•'''':'''.1':',,' 2:'...‘,:'!.,:,.:''. .,.!!,,,:,:.;,-..,'•;"...:1-z•:%-..!,.f,.-..•:•.'":.:‘,•;‘,,:;‘':':•:'1'...;;.;•1:T.,''L'•,,'.,.•Z..",''•:1'C•,2.',.,,:,!'',:,;',•:,::,:••,:,.......:s:" .,:',e•••,-.:.•."..;•,:,',,,,,"..f•-,7,,,i•,-.••,•...q:,'•::•;',-'1 •,••••,.:,L•':,'•,',-•,-;•,',,,S:.,:l..,..,,'":.:•; •",:-,",,,,'f:• • ' '•,, ^ ,-,:•, ; • ,••;.:.'.•::'?::.!',V- ,:::,:"„,:",'1,';',':,, •‘, : •,*,,''•r,. ;,'•,.."..:,?'.•{::l-,,*•'-1'.';::.Ill:,,':i.•,': ,E iki iRA L-:r.LOCATION: , . ., i::,:.:,.:: , ,AND,:.:!,:6.•-,,:0,:..'; ,, ,ADDRESS:,:::,,,:.:,',,:PROPERTY L.9cp,iTE,D. 30_0 Fit . -....,:• ,...- .•• . •-.. ;',;.:• •-: ••• ,i,.'WEST OF EAST:NALLEY•!:.',H1..,PH AY: BT)./1,. ,EN:/S....W ..•':.2,..,9 T H ST. , .' Aips...:,w.„,:...,,,3 4TH,v,..:•',.::'•-•.:.,-:,.,•.:.::,",,,,,'•:, f '- i fioiiLLI-A..'.iiii)OStRii64.:PARK.,;‘,'•.,,--:.•, ',;.. .*;.1.--,.-- , '.1;•••:.•''. .',',.'.; •. .; . :. - '; : •.-• - . .- .:.,•.,•' . •.- ';,• . ,. .' .,, ,. -,:..•';,:: LEGAL:DESCRIPTION',..-:,;; ....'.. ..,..,•-;.,-...-.•,..:,,_' •• ::.--.- ..• ' •.'• '.. .• ..'. . : -' •• ' '.' '• ''.'..'';,'.:':. '' ' l',. :'-' ••''.:•-;;;-' ''''''''... , - • '. .• '- - ,..:.'..,'• .!,.• - , • -,-;.•..-.."..i..;,?,,,..,.:•.,,:....,•..„,...: ,,,., ,-.,•,•••.•.,_, :,......, ... . ,..,,,.., , ,, , ,, , ,, . , ,,...„•?/•:,..,,:i.::.:.:,..:',,,,...!,'„.•:2.ri...,',„',,,..,..,,,-,..,..: •,--',:-.•'..-:.,,.,,..- ,, .. ••.- • .•:•,::,J.:-,.,,:-..„•, ,.'., •.',...', ••,.„,•2 ••• • .• • •• ' f;T-1,E•' R • , ..., , . iiiGAL'. 'CiiiPTioI. ON .FiLE.. 7.I i\1 ENTON, PLANNING DE P A,RTME..,,,N T....:,..• ••:,,,:,,,,.,':....,,,:,,,,.•,. . ,..,, . ,,..,,,i,,,..::...... '•,-•,..-•-:- ,'.'-.-•- :- ...," .2-..'..i- ,• „'.. • ..•• ...- .-:!-,:-..,..:-•,: .,..., ....:-,..,:,- , ..•., •••-: .• . ••• , ..,,, .,,. • ,, , • •',., ' • ••:: .. '.::':. ' '.,' •''.:r. r,-•,.- ''• -.:.: s.,'„ , :,..,,•..,,••• ,,,,,,•,:••.-:::;, ; ,.'-,.. •;-•,' ::: . .. ‘„•.:: • ..--,,-.••:•-•-.,.;,;.,..„,••.:(?'„'....-",.. ..,,,, .,,,,,:. ,',.., ,..:•..-..••;•• ' .--,' .', ', , '• ; . :,•-• ,•,... •.- •• - -- L.,-...,..-.:, - :, • • -. ,• 1, •,,.•.;,.,,..:::',:,:..--,-,',,,.'i,,,..i.,,-,-,:,. •,:.,-..':','. -.',,'.:',...: ,,1.:,..:.-,,-" ..:,',.;•-•L .,.'• :-.....,:';r;'.••••"; -,','...'-•'.'..-:,''''::.,•"..'.-„ '.2'. :-..•.'•.. ', . •••••. :, ... ••• ' :.• „-,:. '• ..,' .-..-,.'..i'2' .....;•...'. ,: :•-•.„. .„..;,:. •,:•-•,''..•,, ......„,T:-?-::.--'::--,.. .....:::,:.-•-:,„-,,,..•',...-'•••••L',: ;',..::'`.'•,..:-..-" .,,..,',.., •'.-,- ,i....•••,.... ,•;:-••,,',..',.k',..:'..::‘,,,:-:,.i'",..v.,•,...i,,',.„''••:•,- •,....‘.• ...-• -:.-„•...i.:',...-.:••,.. ,• : ....: .:,,, •,.. ',.. -, .,,,, ',.,....;•.):',',- ..- '°;:, •.'•-.,i •'•••j''''•.' .,. .-....(,....„,.,:-.,••':••:..,•,-.--...:•..,,,-.,..•,-,..:,-,-:,-,,,,r:,, •,...-,...•.,:,...,:.-,.:.:-:,-,.-;:::,•,:.',,•3:,.!::•,',-..',.',:::,...:',--.:‘,z.,...••••. :',:,•:-..,..,,,,..,',.• : i',.. - '.• .; . , . :.•:, . .... ,••. . .'.-...-, . . .•••.,-.-.:.• • :,.,.," ,,, - - .',. :• .‘,...:‘, .-1,',,,,. '.. ' --_,,':-..',.,,.',-'•:,........-.,:.•••.:•; ::',..'..•;,-...'..• L• ...:'-',.,---.' ,',..-. ...L'•‘ :'''''''.:'\::::: ::".',.-k-;:..:.1','••,Z:-:',..'..:'...;',' '.,:''‘' . '''' ..:',.". , .' 1%1' ',-,'q'''.',. • ',‘.'i ,S,:. ':). .": '.. • '• , ,'-.;,'', ', '1,'! -, ,,-,-,.:„': ,.':1,,,,,r,,i.,'-::. -•'.,'''.':1::',:',,,,:.,:-,,.':'.•:.‘;, ,,,,:',,:::.,'.;"::Fii.,,,I,,,y,';;;'', ,:::::!:::::::,;1:,,:'.1..;ii;‘,.ii.,'...',,‘,::,:,',',.t,.',.,::',;.....:,''•;.:.:',, ;,:';'.1.'.,2',,'.•.''',.?'-':,' -.'. ;'',''''-:,''1'''.'''''i;:t:. ''.. . :'.':'' '''.''''';4. :2''''',::::;',.:::: i.',.'•C',',''' : . ':: ''.. '..''''' ' ;-:';''''' 10:13!,':'[.'s:e7';:;';''.':,;;'!,'if;:;:::.'i:.,.,',!•:,.•',',':;-'-;.:-E:!,:,,,,,, .;•:-._:::::.';'..,,,.,'..2:..,,I..'-:`,/ jii.i,;:;;;'',1,.'',',.,•r:;:.::'........1,-:,,';'?,,.::::,'2;;;'!,il.,::„::.:', '-;:!l',.r;,:c,''',':'::.,..,:%:,,,..„'f',,'",,..,.;.:.„'...'..,":.,.. , .. ,., ; ' , , ' '.,••,,,,,;-;.,•,`,'..,,:, ,,,. ...' ,'',i, ., ,'..:,., ,:, ',.;:. ...-'4''',..'..,-:':'-`,:::;;.''''.;...Z1,;'',,,''f-':-./;';',."•; '2`'',::' ',''',.S':r;:?;;;'f,''',2'.:,.7,"1'2.;.-.;,,,..:•!•-i','„:.." '...: ,,'.','-',,..--.,,':'',, " :„,. , -'., ,. . , .'..',„., ' ,. , . OWNERS. OF ... ... . , . .., . , ; ... 1 S-POSTED : TP ,,,NOTIFY PROPERTY . . . ,..,....., - •• • , ' .„ ,-,,,,,,,-; .ii,.'• ' .•tr;-...:..-"i,,,, ;',I.,. .?;.,:- l'•:, ;.'. .!.- •• .:—••-• ..• ,....,::.,:.:.r.--„:,-,, .• . ,.,,,. . • .2.,,,,,,4,._ .,... .- ,;.!!. ,,..1t,"P''.„,L.: -it',,.;,,L . :: -4 ,,,.... : . _ ,,.,.,,_ f:,,,_ .,.itt-,.; " itl:,..1161!).,:' , `,'''',, .7::,,''',.", i,-,i ,'" —4r; '', .•'..,'":.- ''',' ;'',.i;,..,',;,.'',, .:'.4iri . ,: ,,"•. lik.4' .'','?. ''.. t ::$.,.... :', 1 -,'"''• Y: :: '' •, ' , :;',-.." 1 • . ir'...?,.,',, ;-..'''..f, .•';',. *„,'.'.' "!.' •'lig, ','‘ 'iii ;;;INV. ,ii '••- 'F.,' 4' •-:: .', ,-, ',•1'.; '•, 4, ,i-„,,-,..-. .%,- -.- . .i. . - .,.‘..,: ,, . -,,- :.''. : :,.....',...;-:T...:.-.....".:,,,,:i.....„.. A .;, • : Is .,,,,,,, 4,7.,.1.:- .. ',...,-...'!•,:c . .., - ••,.... ' . . ' .. ; ,, ..,. , :::„ ..„'--.,:. ',-.'„'•--. ':•.,,,...=:.... . ,,f.- ,- ;•.•- :- •,,-j--'•-,, ,`. ...:.:: .'• :.- '''_•1••• : ' '.', -, ' ' . . • '' '•:;','''!.•i . .':'''' . :- •• :.•- . '• ' • ..-:,%1 ''' ' ...' TO. BE HELD , . .. . . . . . . . . . .. , . .. .• ., ' ' . . . . . . .,, . • . .. , , ' ...'-'. IN CITY. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING . . .., . .ON ' • ',. /km. • ,. . ',, ,. :,„.r.,,. ' 'NOVEMBER 28')' 1978 , '•'- .• 't4:EGINNING AT 9:00 AM., ;- -•: -.' ''.' - - . . .• . ,.. . _ . . . . , . • ' ' . • • ..•••• . . •. . . . . , . . . , ... , .•,,. . . . . . . • .. . , , .. . , . .. . . . . , CONCE1 Ni..•..,:i.iG ITEM WI . . .. ., . . .• ' ' . . . . . • , . , ' , . • 7AC1, ..1•'',,]',..1,..... gm '-'41 r' Iwo AO FOR FILL AND GRADE IN M-P ZONE .„. ,,,,.. 31,A4- ' '.-,,,,, .'''."...4., ,,.`,•,:--, 3. ,.i.? OF WAREHOUSE FACILITY . ,,. • „o''. .,„,..,. - :, - ,,,IN 4;:. ;ii,:.] ;.:10:, silk J,:ki 1 FOR DEVELOPMENT 'l, _ ::'-'-,_ .,::::', ,4,...i, i:' ,!,,,:—. .,,r ..., 1,,,,...., ,,,,, , a,-,...: ,,,,,,..,. i . . , • . • . , , , . ' • . . .. . , .. , . . , , ,. • ' ‘,. . . ' - . . --',' •"'" , •d'i-,' ' `t.' , ' ,, ,..t••,•'' :'''':'.;.•',:'',• I.• :'Y • ' ..,,: • :•' , . .. , , • "'' . , , . . , 4,- , - NAGEME .,,,,.. , PERMrii. . ,'•. ,. ,.. •.`,:: .., 1111V,, i.;,.„,,.„4,:,, „,. „,, , . ' ' 10.`' . • . ';::,,. t%.'.4 :‘, :'. : ht,, !;'''* ; , . '''';'.. .,',.....,.. ',.',-,'., -, ' ,, ':•`:':;2.,.1•'',:,''',''''T ''''....':::,'. :-' .':-. -::: '''''''',..'•,-;'::.,...•L` .i'.:; .','..;, ..:+!:'. '''., . ', '..;.',„,4,,„..,,„ . . .; ' ., - :, '''':;'",:.,'.',,.?:,-;:.4,.`,:''..::',P,::,:;,:":',..::'''.'•''''.,:',‘•,c..'::;;,,':' ''''...,,', :,!,',-.- -/,';',:. ''',,..'..L_:','.'2,';',','.',,:•..„.'r ,. ., ., - ,,'. •. ::: ";', ' , „ ::.....:2 'I "...1 '.' :''::;f:':r..:. '' ';' 5-; ;:' ;:',.:..''' :::,:::''1' '': : ''.. '; .:' .::::::,,..i..''.:,..','.: .'.',..'". ,.:.;:''''',,::Ti...,''';;:',. ';;:'I.::;':::',:,.'2'-.:::'.:'',:'•‘,‘.'FF:. ::',' '''::::::'..'''' ''''.''' • L' "': ':'.''';','''''..:,:i .';''... ..''''''''',r.:'::,'.',r,!"',1; :.':....:.;:'l':::.'.:''..4'..!'''''''';','',':'''''AIC:-'''''''; •''''''''".":''''` ' . . .'.'... ' ', ' :. ' ' '. ' 1;'.'''':':.:.''''''''' ,?'''...'.'. ''''''..','.',.';'' ' '',':' ' .'''.,' "„ ;Y:'''' c::: 1:54217.'',2,'''',.7;.,.:::: .. .. ,. .i..',, ,L, (:;:4 ;:.„?; ,'...'', ',;•',, ,7-;,,. :, .:...,-,;,7,:',l -',.'' -!''' •'1i;.','‘.''','..',.i..'f'';'..2.:•: : '.1 ;''.',.'.':::•l'!' ''',.,,:',,:..''-''.i.i:,',4.,,‘;'''. , i.i..-‘,'-3: ., ..:,_, '..';.: -,%:--•:'::;: -`;,..,,''':;:' :, ''' l'-';' " .'' ': : * - '; ,;.!_.:- ...:-.!'..:.;' '.;-•,•:1,... '';'1. ,'''',.',,,i; .!..,;;-;?'••;'; .-..,;''''''''' :::'-1.:,'', ‘, ,:..0.,,: -'::R;,;.:,_r, ,;,',': i:;,:;i::::.: ,,„. , „..:,:,•:',....,;,-. , ,:.;•;:::''.t';`,:',:',.-7-?;'',;; .`4,',.42,'-is,,..,,,,,,i...--:,;,4,i,...'..,i ic.A.-+,Aki, CALL.:.-235",-,'2550,4(':;.N:X"...r.,,,. ,,,:::).11...b.5,-.-v.‘,, ' 5 ' . r '.:n... coR ..-RffiRTHERAir‘rwn!!!!:;41.!imo!,I , ,, ,,..)., ..r.i...,. .,,, ,.:,.,4,42..L,.,,,,f...(.. .,;-..:,..,..-"..,.•,,,y:..)..0-z!..,.,,,,-.;,,,,,,I...145,,,ii,,,,',,, ,,.. ,) -..,...._.,.,...-,,... ..,....;.1,,..k,,-iszilf*,44 .,,-,,, ,..„•:,-r,;:,,i-,.;T, ,.-4 ,-,:..7y- ..',-A,. .-.,.,."'" ".'.-.T .i-..-..".•":- . ',.-:.'"'" ,„".'". ,.. ';',1-''J;1,-.;'4,f,'::.:'-');::,'{';:i.",:.'1'j,''':;:::.:,•-i:A:.'; •-;:q. j.''''.:'i::',',... .'':' ::':::•''.'','',:;•• 1';'.;nVAIIP1'4.'''',,,44gi,-:'; i'l ''"'•?11-;-''Y'' '' .: ,--;'-km,:.opER ,,,,,ALITHoRizATIvil..:,•1?.:ip,',/,‘; ...?:,-,k,.-ot.-,tiej,k-,'Btf-RENCIVEID. WITHOUI.::-.-.ricl,.... , ,.,,,,?.g.-.,..4,,,,:i3,6.-:,,, t.-vg,,-?, °4ni;:c.'.-,.%,,,..1. ;:f,,,.. i;:cmS)-:,.NOTICE;;;;;::. .,...,„ ."......"...:',",..., .. -.",,,,,,:,-tv'e..y..*,;-:,,,,,,,,,,,-,;'-;,4-.:,,,,,,5'.4,-f„,',-,i,,,,:, :-:-.:,,P,-g„,:..:i..i.A.f;-..!...',:,:-.?...%';',, ..., -...:::4,..,1,f. ,,:::1..i,,,\*.fill,...W,!,,,AtArt:'.;"'!::;:-.,.4T,,:p::,;:i,',4-,':;-„,-,,,,,s,,...!',.!. ,,.... .,, .k.,,,}i , ,-..,,,,,',,,,,,,,.n,..T,, , . ,,..4vA . )4,!.17,,,,,:.,, -..,,',.,....:;'..-•::'',r.. ',•.,': ,,• ,.,,',-.,,. „,. :.. ,, . i.,1,',4,1,':Vi.i';' ..":17.- :`-;- ''''r!r:5:, ',..,;•,:;•;-,'• : ','.',•:i,',.:;!?'4•;:!'.4•,,NP•,•.". •,i,':,,I',„:1..,;?,,,•.:i•-i:;•'••:,,,. ..::'.,'•i.'':;;;',.. •-' ••' • • :'. - ' •-„ • [ fr;r:;•-•'.•'::: `,:"?'::•/.:,:,'„4'...,:r.'1,,!t'''*7,,.:-,i4''','''''::::-',':,':,';'.,1;•',-•'',i'•'•..<:.':',•''‘t• .''••/:••'•.:•/•'C.,:,-,•1',--'.:;''',:‘ ,:,,,i,.-0,:,::-6.";',''. '•,: ' •.'•'•'•••-•: ' • " '1 :••• .'•• • 6.-',,l',' .,.....:.•: ',..... '''''' 1:• '1.,',,. .: ,•', •". - ',. • ' ' '‘•- '••'"•'•t:•' •” ''- • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES , File R-217-78 , REZONE FROM G-9600 TO R-3 , HEARING EXAMINER RECON- SIDERATION OF APPLICATION ; property located on Lake Washington Blvd . N . E . between S . E . 76th and Lake Washington Blvd . N . E . 2 . BROWN/STRAND HOMES (WINDOW LANE ) , File PP-254-78 , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 14-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION ; property located between N . E . 12th Street and N . E . 14th St . 3. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS , INC . , File SA-258-78 , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE ; property located at S . W . 10th Street and Powell Ave . S . W . , Earlington Industrial Park . 4 . GARFIELD ASSOCIATES , LTD . , Files SP-253-78 and SA-252-78 , APPLICATIONS FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE IN M-P ZONE AND SITE APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF WAREHOUSE FACILITY IN M-P ZONE ; property located 300 feet west of East Valley Highway between S . W. 29th St . and S . W . 34th St . in Orillia Industrial Park . Legal descriptions of files noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED :PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED November 17, 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STFVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the 15th day of November ��D�f"C 1978 'SIGNED Q PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 APPLICANT : GARFIELD ASSOCIATES , LTD. (DONALD E . ORAZEM , AGENT) FILE NUMBERS : SA-252-78 AND SP-253-78 A . SUMMARY OF REQUEST : The applicant requests site approval for development of a 144 , 000 square foot warehouse facility in an M-P zone along with approval of a special permit for fill and grade . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : JOSEPHINE FRANDSEN 2 . Applicant : DONALD E . ORAZEM FOR GARFIELD ASSOCIATES , LTD . 3. Location : Between S . W. 29th and S . W. 34th Streets , 300 feet west of the East Valley Highway. 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the • Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : ±9 . 11 acres . 6 . Access : Via S . W . 34th Street . 7 . Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing Park . 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : . M-P , Manufacturing Park . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park . 10 . Notification : • The applicant was notifed in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly • published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To permit the construction of buildings for use as a transfer warehouse with rail and truck loading facilities . To be included are an office and separate maintenance garage structure . D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 dated April 14 , 1959 . The site was filled in 1975 (file SP-822-75 ) , rezoned by Ordinance 2992 , dated March 10 , 1976 , and approved as a final plat on July 17 , 1978 . E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is essentially level . 2 . Soils : The underlying soil materials are Snohomish Silt Loam ( So ) and Tukwila Muck (Tu ) . The entire site has been overlain with artificial fill . I I 1 , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GARFIELD ASSOCIATES , LTD . ( DONALD E . ORAZEM , AGENT ) NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 PAGE TWO 3 . Vegetation : The only significant vegetation on site is scrub brush and grass . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : No surface water was noted on the site . 6 . Land Use : The property adjacent to the west has been approved for a facility similar to the subject request . The properties north , south , and east remain undeveloped . To the east across the East Valley Road are located several businesses . F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The properties in the vicinity are experiencing a transition from undeveloped land to commercial /industrial uses of light industrial / manufacturing park nature . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An existing 12 inch main runs north-south along the East Valley Road within 1/4 mile to the east of the subject site , and a 12 inch main extends east-west within 1/4 mile to the north and a 24 inch main runs north-south . along the Lind Avenue extension approximately the same dis- tance . Along the East Valley Road within 1/4 mile to the east of the subject site exists an 8 inch sanitary sewer which eventually becomes a 24 inch pipe . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route 150 operates along SR- 167 within 1/4 mile to the east of the subject site . 4 . Schools : Not applicable . 5 . Parks : Not applicable . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-730 , Manufacturing Park . 2 . Section 4-732 (A) ( B ) , Mining , Excavation , and Grading . I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June , 1976 . J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Natural systems on the site have been disturbed by previous filling and grading . The proposed fill and development of the subject site will increase storm water runoff , and raise traffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated , however. ' K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Not applicable . L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW-43-21C , a declaration of negative impact has been issued for the subject proposal . This declaration is further based on the provision of suitable landscaping , screening , and other development standards PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GARFIELD ASSOCIATES , LTD . (DONALD E . ORAZEM, AGENT) NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 PAGE THREE which reduce visual and other impacts of the development and are consistent with M-P zone standards and. Comprehensive Plan objectives . M . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached . N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . 0 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element which designates the site and surrounding area as manufacturing park . 2 . The applicant proposes to construct a 143 ,800± square foot truck/rail warehouse with offices on a 9± acre site located between S . W. 34th and S . W. 29th ( both proposed ) approximately 300 feet west of East Valley Road . The proposed truck oriented warehouse will also serve as a storage and light repair yard for trucks and trailers of Garfield Transfer. A 3 , 000± square foot repair garage is proposed as a part of this activity to be located in the rear (north ) yard area . 3 . The proposed freight distribution facility is consistent with the manufacturing park zone permitted use , setbacks , landscaping , and other requirements . Additional landscaping has been provided to insure compatibility with future M-P uses in the area , and other performance standards . 4 . The current filled grade of the site is approximately 15± feet . The applicant proposes to fill to elevation 21 . 6± feet the area for the warehouse and repair garage and store an additional 4500 cubic yards on a one acre site at the north end of the site . 5 . On July 31 , 1978 , the Hearing Examiner approved a somewhat similar activity for Superior Fast Freight on the property immediately to the west . 6 . The proposed site plan and landscaping area is generally consistent with Comprehensive Plan objectives and the requirements of Resolution No . 1923 between the City of Renton and Soil Conservation Service (Comprehensive Plan , Green River Valley , June , 1976 , valley and site objectives , pp . 5-8 ) . Because of the large expanses of structure , asphalt , and the potential for storage of trucks and trailers , additional landscape buffering and a screening fence have been provided around the periphery of the site and within the site interior . The landscaping buffer along the westerly side , separating this use from Superior Fast Freight appears to be somewhat less than adequate and would certainly be inadequate should Superior not be constructed . The landscape separation should be increased to 10 feet and tree/shrub plantings extended accordingly. The areas provided appear suitable to provide visual buffering and wildlife food and habitat . 7 . Areas have been designated on the site plan for future develop- ment . Such future development shall be subject to further site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GARFIELD ASSOCIATES , LTD. ( DONALD E . ORAZEM, AGENT) NOVEMBER 23 , 1978 PAGE FOUR 8 . Drainage plans have been coordinated with the Engineering Division , and shall be subject to final approval by that division , with the provision of suitable on-site retention and oil /water separation facilities . 9. Utility plans shall be .coordinated with and approved by the Public Works and Fire Departments . 10. Building exterior treatment and color shall be compatible with M-P Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan objectives subject to Planning Department approval ( Green River Valley Compre- hensive Plan objectives , June , 1976) ., 11 . Suitable bond shall be provided in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of landscaping installation and for a three-year maintenance period . 12 . A preload plan for building construction has been submitted and is considered suitable for approval with the site plan as part of on-site construction per Section 4-2305 . 1 . F of the Mining , Excavation , and Grading Ordinance . The subject site was filled as part of a special permit application for Glacier Park Company , approved in 1976. 13 . The landscaping plan incorporates suitable screening of the proposed excess fill per Section 4-2307 . 5 . I and must be installed as a part of site development with suitable irrigation . 14 . A Flood Zone Control Permit is required for the subject site development . 15 . Proposed height of the building is approximately 30 feet , which is consistent with the height requirements of the M-P zone. 16 . The 60 foot open space on the east side of the building must be substantiated prior to issuance of a building permit . 17 . Review and approval of storm water detention plans by the. Public Works Department . 18 . If truck traffic is to use S . W. 34th to East -Valley Road prior to installation of improvements , temporary paving must be extended to the satisfaction of Traffic and Engi - neering Divisions . Pa PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : • Recommend approval of the proposed site plan and special permit to fill and grade based on the above analysis subject to the following conditions : 1 . Development of S . W. 34th Street and S . W . 29th Street to full City standards ' per approval of the Public Works Department . 2 . Final Planning Department approval of landscape , berming , and screening plans with the provision of an installation and three-year maintenance bond per 0 , Analysis , No . 11 . The westerly property line planter shall be widened to ten feet for its full length and screen tree planting extended accordingly to provide a pleasant environment , minimize the impact of the development , and enhance the visual experience from adjacent properties in accordance with Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , page 7 , Site Objectives , Landscaping and Open Space . • i PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GARFIELD ASSOCIATES , LTD . ( DONALD E . ORAZEM, AGENT ) NOVEMBER 28 , 1978 PAGE FIVE 3. Provision of suitable on-site storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities per Public, Works Department. approval and ordinance requirements . 4 . Provision of suitable utilities per Public Works and Fire Departments- approval . . 5 . All landscaping surrounding the excess. fill area shall be installed with initial development of the property including irrigation systems . 6. Approval of a state Flood Zone Control Permit by King County Hydraulics Division and Department of Ecology . 7 . The concrete tilt-up building exterior treatment and colors as previously discussed by the applicant shall be compatible with M-P Ordinance standards and Comprehensive Plan objectives per Planning. Department approval . 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit evidence to the sat- isfaction of the City Attorney shall be provided substanti - ating the 60 foot open space on the east side of the building . 9 . If truck traffic is to use S . W. 34th to East Valley Road prior to installation of improvements , temporary paving ' must be extended to the satisfaction of Traffic and Engi - neering Divisions . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department , ® Park Department Police Department Public Works Department '%°-`z �f,7 "1/t' Building Div. "7 Engineering Div. 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) -iviO I2' � Oki DATE : I!) i 7 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT l/r" �� SPECIAL PERMIT `' L0 ' l� WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT iill�, WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE A1416 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . Department : 61L:E)6; Comments : Signature of Dir tor�lor Auth ized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : r Department : — " // Comments : - ----- i-. - g -- / it7/. /78 Signature of Dir "t rior A thori a presentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : , " ._._..... //A /?CI-- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : VT►a.irues Comments : f xrar►ta,-Ls 10JAtc3rt. ‘814)11E,a. rysniu-k Rt dar% C -tT►acT "Tl..►Tbr S re 41m1Strn J... Poit. Pecs a STD. h:�►4�i.t iil�w�,-►� ot..16S g rac to Lit 4orc To col..csT, aeo. Uc►64rsas ct46s. i4/ce ea. w�, . . Sew. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :. %r2 r-'i��� ��� ` �.; ,. /7- Comments : 4r-7moo`/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department Police Department Public Works Department /7 . --e7,�y4 21.- CO Building Div . 0 Engineering Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his del igneee) a bat1V4 lA UII/ Vi DATE : aal PLEASE REVIEW THIS 'APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT EM—V;r2.---71-2 —`SITE APPROVAL tldti t ) . SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE ill a ` ) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ,t3(_— � Comments : a [QL� ("D .cijoiG-Ge— 0--.-cam �s j c / .C)e1 L—. 5 r r- - -Sci 8,37 A/t-o T 0 t /7 / mil/.Li ( //lFr0lz----- / / 5 Signature of .' rbctor or Au orized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : _o Department : ;1'/kg- Comments : / ) /'— /72 Signatu e tb�o DirecF or Aut orized Representative /ba .. • . . . , . . . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ' Department : c ,..- •-:" .....,1 (....,•, , , : ,.• .-‘..„...1 ----\.,.., Comments : .. c.tf-- - 4 -L._ '. .-- ,;/._2.-6•.....-2-=ti.':;:--- 0 r, '...„,,j,..,....t..,, :. . • • • • , . . . . .-/ • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • . • . . . . . REVIEW ' BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : •trot.li-ig..s . . Comments : . . /1-6 •7 r .. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY .DEPARTMENTS : • . , Department : . . ,._ Comments : • - / i 9-,--, Oics.,.::. Le.:,.....)-r...i. ,-T Z1) Ty- ?...;c_ ic / '.. , J - 2 iL 5 1,.} :3/. r17 Z-ct ,6- , (., .)_, , ,,I, /L.. ,r_ 73 ,15 i-y,(2:-.,4,-,/,/, .5 1..,ec.) -7-,1?-,.,/D., v-q..."..-7 / ,,..::,,d, /..::--a-• 4. d „,"?,,,,,1•. . ,,..:::.... . c:,....: ".--,-.;„.,.,,, _,,._.. ,.._. .,.,. . Signature of Director or Authorized Representatfve Date • REVIEW BY 'OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ' Comments : • . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • .• . . . . ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS ' TO: ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department © Public Works Department . 8Building Div. . Engineering Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div. ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) XJIt7 e , 810lail,7 #11115 SUBJECT: Review of. ECF ; Application No . : *144 Action Name: 4,44// , A" I/- _ Gl'd1,5e fr r/� i1 el e—i' r eke '&1fri'l Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 0 :E)67--; Comments : I I -/--' ,10. C----- C.--7‘-11..•"6-7 ///47'g Signature of Dire or Authorized Representative date REIEW, BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 4,. ,p—tr, ,,1.4,T 3 Comments : y /-- f''' _. /i /G /7 - Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: uT►LlT►►_S 0 ' Comments : coMTp+c,T VTt1.17%65 84:44I/%1aist t , =o G t R IN{tL tIP1L'GS• vibe ON640-4/si.tgN-1.4 OLoGS ot= iDU,TloMs 7v "#•i w ACMit- As. s law art- S Vsflar-t wH ac,W Aft se sseia 7'ti Vs lav/¢ TI4k T'T1s. STp. twit. riAs CKG / d• ea, 60rT4 TZW. vO,tZ //-G•7r Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : %y a / . J Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representativ' - Date 9 P REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: Comments : 0 I . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date j ., II i 4 `� I o I z I771 # B u I J • I _i711i =J t .:II: " r_ .ice. o� e, 5 rt- .. :-- ----, 1 _, _ I ill _�- I W zi I', x0. e 1.12 DoI'A•i71.3 Alai NO 1 - • �— III' • .:'.. A- �. H I ,z'� 9, . m.pt... . . 1 . • . , 1\ " • 15 h 4 . i 7 ..1' - L• 1 . . ' I 1 I - , , [ - _ i ...._,...,.....,..................„........._, • 1 6 l Q - - immommimmommmommomme IS IA 29TN57:j 1 I • I • I 1 • t ' 1 r • 1 ,$.9 466)0 II i , -- Wnl - "- 4TE per' - I . ,.,;.-- -.. I) - - • ;, ., .5 • 1 2 ' , , . i a, ltit 71 SR -i -7 r i tTI , I , , i� w. qm •a w ..�...� -__ . _ _ ._ 9 i9 2C 2 li — - - - 8 I L Z3 Za C5 . .r+ t� 1-� f UM :::.:'j ayi ar a.1as as 5 42 a, ;ao'39 3e . 11.4966 ` , • ?p 1 t .__ - - •• •. - . • -Jo' -1-- •• f •} • } t Iv 21 ti . Z i d �' ' li OM I I r a9 5J 3,• , • , 55 I . 5! Se .9 .'I ,I .• �I J _'S2 S'S -�� .I T1i SPECIAL PERMIT - SITE APPROVAL : GARFIELD ASSOCIATES , LTD . . APPLICANT GARFIELD ASSOCIATES, LTD. TOTAL AREA ±9. 11 acres ' PR I NC I PAL ACCESS Via S.W. 34th Street EXISTING ZONING M-P, Manufacturing Park . j EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Warehouse Facility COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS • • • • • • - . . . . • / . • . . 0 -r ‘fAtt,stti Vo0649 o 4 -- ...__ . . __ _ _ _ _ - - - --.7.-F-- -.--:-- --1----.--. — . - • .....„ a _ • :I‘ . . _ . •1-4;2?"11-SPH CO: 1:;tt-,-., :-..-z`-',../11 71.4..../i ty .:7.‘,1.E.P • • - - .i• • 7., ,.....:,., 11,...t'rt ..! : ,--- ..... \-N - .,., .... - - -"-- - - - - -' :...;',.•?:::•-•,..:•43-,;.,•-ft..1 ,5:•-•41ifttii3!„-.,,V,..-.1,:e TI,;•----4.' ...*';'''':• -•'•:-.'.- - ',..-:1•:;,,:•••:•-•.: .i.,•-•:-:',..,''' •;,,,:.-••• ,____.____ • . . --"'-,..,-.-,-- ''' - ---- , • ..rial;.&" , • , , •---"s-'`v-''. &-I1Fel. -nil•• -,-:--;.:`,— r•-•04',"k"..4,1-,4-3;•:-.2:71- ":1 P.:5124 q) • e4, .,' •' • i ,' -- -iArif:_.7-_---TE-4.iocr-Pi c., ;,F.:-..;.,:,-:2:--7! 7,:,-,.-e::;;Y:.--,-V*.-4.-P4i.. *;.E.t.'::::=',••!:--f-;;:;?$ft:14-ZiOV:g*VeriRrOP414C TA7,1171':,-'4,..i' '15-16f6' :'T`I''%. 'F'.?"2.=.64c-45"-- .7 --.1117:-":.:::':: ''../ 4 A.' '444'.4.5!.;;;'..C' '..Vp-...._- '€, t-ii r____•6 --4,.4) .._., ',1 -—•-''':.4-.'-'•';,I;••-.7'‘.:F-..7.• _-•--,•*1-i,';'-':'' -.';',1-"•'j -;"."-- `:•.--' '`',1":'-P--4."•,,V,:z`'f-"••ifesttcr•aq'tlti'l.1•"4 *.,:Sf:11-1.:i'z:'p- .k.P,„%v -,--'0, ,,,:0, .-;-,?-401,,, ,...,14,:,71 . ,--4.• .‘r...f4cra.*.,4,,:r14.. -t, •K.,-; .. ,44t- -..:- t-- T- ..,,,p.„.-,- - ;;;.!"4,7 •-f iiN .'41...e.''..`.•- 'f''P'''''''', -''''::t'' ..;'‘'' ''..: ' '.---2 .5-''..r'r-I.A4°.:'%*Te..- 1.0S :r.`11PIW*4',e-r,:isit'f.',' '5 31. s' ,,t,•;-xa 4 ,.•-;'-`,2?1."'; '•,*.•',',4' -.1 ' - -i% _r_A•ptt ._ _,.• 1',"...., ,4`,11 '','C: '. : ..2...."gr-.• ....- . („5 . __.. t„... . ..I ,-,-,-"•• ".,1!.'"4.1t',--:'4.-f';•,-' .-1.4.'•='-',4''',‘•'•• ''''_.-,'---: "`i:4.-'4..",t,S,?..t.'1.•-•:,,ck,r,i;, 4.?•,t,r-414UtF.K. :fr, :N4,4.. •=,-;7,.' 4" .4",.. • --',• -•^'''.-=.--••••A — ..• • .-MO ,:.4 : 4 4.,'".' .=.--.7:'''- •'4"..' -tn.-, ...._.., • 6- L - :, ------,F.,, • '. • 'l • .e. zi-• - •.,..• ,e-, , 4-,eAr-..,z: t zr . .,4,.. ,•• -,5o z • '4--•-4..0c,-, A, -••••••,s,- , 4- 41,3-; .,. i..• - .1.;:t ,-,-,••;;i,:t$:.--... -,t••,..t.4i J:?_.0-'1:-.''et. ^ ?,...7,1:-?••4•;;;', *.... ilf.giflF:7:/;'-ri.Vi '.q• .' -,... ...s='••=,3-----, .':. ....1i.,K.,:ri . . .--= -4--,-, .....,,.., - &et:45 i_ I s.4• ;- A:-4.4•=_ .; i!.',. . ...• ;/..ii ft . .'"••,E.`‘'. .:Vg,k-,;'1 t• .; . -1. ,A4*'. *.‘ &41.',.;-P 1 '•. :•''--..fifir.iiii V -15 ti?"-27,'f.1 "I '.. -. I, •,.---TV,:'',.,•••2. ; ' . til••i' ::r • - '',;',. :'-5•,4-itie ,.,',`,-7.,....,:-,.,!' '4::•.4.4..",Y5:;ti:$5,11.. -';'7."41t..;$2..al,.: .'.,:! ,..4.'-ii •,,,`ip,'-,',., - .t -,..,,-, •:-• • •:Y—'i,-1.xtP-- itk\ . , '.1,- ••••:**-7 .1 . •:;: :1: • )t'l' Atole - 25 Pt...71,1'i Z.F.:"..a 5 .,,._ . I i,441•44•_t 1 t" ' t -..- p 1 L,'' . .•.. 1.- 'L .1:4".'..ei li ' 4,':,--•-•ri"-I.,'-,..;,...,---41.4."••;',“ 4-:''.'-..V-1--,. :11,--fit, -.1-;1,i- ..•-• ....,A -e-, ,-':l'14,;:, lk,••-•:'"i 5', '...:.;-.:4,-: ::O.N.,.A. . .. ,... z.,., 1„, .1 1,k F ,ii ..1- t •., .4;1.v, - -, ti.....,..'4.',C.,:l.:1.t......., :".;..--._.,:r1.,f?.-Ifl,....;:fis.-",=.‘,.:1•4•&•;": :-4,',;-:-..*1W.---:.'t• ',-.7 ..„-,,t; Ass:, ,,.1.1- -4, ,,, .i..--- -_,„. - '-d'-i,,',-,,, ,i, .... .,,,_.'!.1-, i:,,,I.,,,: . . ,. 1 • • ,/"- -7% ,:4'...I‘•.. ''.,,,!k•'=4I 5.1,F...' ,_::,'".,;:-.=•.;:l.:1-,Y,,'•-....Y.'...e. ..,.'1.'...;:''',-.:..&V-,.4'..!'43.'4-3.''''':'''''-V,::-:t 'W. 4111C4Atitif*?'....- .7.,'A`.-Vir-ti ,..6'.'; ''"X-,-0. tt;',1, I'''.' . :''.-I- 4,%',".'; 1i)• .1 t ;t-.. ' ',12•".I. c I-- . .1.41; '1. • , ; 4 0 .:1.',...v .,,z.,..,...,.-.--,. . ..,,N. ....?,...;-,„: -4,../-:-...:::‘?3.1.14;1-1.4..,1114:',',,t!'ji"-'''''411•;'•-r4;k.•:-: ..-A..1r-t-•,'••.4.•-•-."` -:,.--1,-0:_li-X.,,%•Ni.•••,', . ...,••-fa,t,"•-•Js -6 -.P-1.t... . ''.l• ' ''''';.- . .-"-.,,2•:1,1,-,•,.,,, ‘r ' ' • ,..:.... , .. ..,. .- . .;,-,.,.e,, ,V.,.^..,;.):,,:,:,:;,:•,....LY: .,1•z•-,...,-;;;;;:...-,•,,, 4 .'',:i•:•e4,,,;:".•...'1'2,7`•741-45..;P-4.,14,141f,'',---; t'r4Iti,1 z,114"-P2•,---'•••-•w-•;-:-•4•tAtt'w.,,•*".-7'41.41' 7" V WK,'.- I i.-i,: I • : ' i...-',-.: , r,••7---i: • • :r ••-•' ' '21 ,--N • '.---." CI (0 :T•'7 :'-;-i•-•;.,-.5. , . - • • • 0 . . .i : .'4'• " - - 1 ••,-.4- i-7 •t•-•• -F• , .1' - ",-4.-.•..g%...'a.7,, .”..t:-.k•:r^ Z _S1Z 1._C4_:_ 06414ge--ti ..1,,6A,Pr It44/ 17e9°. ANSP.' 1: .4., ...... .,-' , `..7.If.1.- Zl. .... -_Y.- •f) , :-(1•1). eme"'_ --i ',..... W% 4r = t = "SI:U:JIGT = [rn " rs, r: r . : 4: rfrtsff11". er .- i1UVM74Cltif 10 tvaa -tarri4 r D P :•,-i7 1...1-1,7 . . - - ....--- , Peecoi g' B FX,-. -C.=.-t",-.,'r'- E--•D,-,.E,•:r-.:.••-.1Z:•-•-••r.-9--f--,1frF--! C.E--.•.-:.-,:.-- ..:.--.,..:..--..x r-.-F-•-.r—. --- . F, s1 , 4uto . - 2.5s,6,•7.r..'IIII _Z. /2 .•,„:,iI V00I r rRI' 4 T - 7 - • • . . . . , E PI CFI' ."---..P •1-_-..- -...._-y :.;•-- --:-.L ..••.•.....z:-.- ...-,-,-...Ft 2. GAI.-- -NN .:‘,.:,:4:.1,-.p; ' G m...,_ --, -..".. ,--....„ •-•- ••_;KS:--:.:• _-•,.,-.a. GAL- • !-.I i•.,,•:-F•4•_:;,,1 -e ailLinimm ..........1111M 2.•GAL 5' 0 C... • ..q,';`1;t•;i.:'.r...,.4:1.1',., ,--,•;_c.,,-,6.....:•.: ,-,x--•. •l 2..! 1-5 _' ..•:. •-,-... 1 %, .,., • - R0 20--2. 1/2"GAJ....- 4-0.__,O.C.- . = • . . •T;..,• -- H P6ATX..NU5 A.C.ERIF*01-4A- L.01.-120 r...1 Pt-.N .TREE • - -•,e-CTir.-.)F4 ,-.:'::;k:'--C, e.As-1- .NT FY:2T ri 1-4-4r1i--E..f-- Y _.. -!E-_ • .i.4..i: _a- iii,:2;• ., '.--.. i9r • •': . , a , Alley ot% n464 ISIetvg°‘11541 111010 . 4reig, ffatrc . - , 40,AH,V. Ilk- AITY-0X. 1,0 6460-00,0 ir-414 .e— . - . -0k.— Z 2"Igi • . , . . . ' . • • • • PROPOSED/FINAL 'ut.CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE , SA-252-78 Application No . SP-253-78 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF-408-78 O FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests site approval for development of a 144,000 square foot warehouse facility in an M-P zone along with approval of a special permit for fill and grade. Proponent GARFIELD ASSOCIATES, LTD. (DONALD. E. ORAZEM, AGENT) Location of Proposal oftthenEast'valley and Highiway.34th Streets, 300 feet west Lead Agency . CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is Q is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the. lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration is based on the provision of suitable landscaping , screening , and other development standards which reduce visual and other impacts of the development and are consistent with M-P zone standards and Comprehensive Plan objectives . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Offi ial Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plann ng 1�/ ect• - Date November 20 , 1978 ! r -� Signature . .� 7 , , J ` City of Renton Planning Department 5-76