No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-287 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE SPECIAL PEPMIT SP- a87- 79 IN P - 1 ZONE ; TALbor cirY LiMltS AND �E\l DEHK REF : . R- aBCo - 79� - ---r-' . , . OF R4, Ak •I5, . . - 4.4 41 0 THE CITY OF RENTON , 0 40 120 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 2. tall — 0 ..... i CHARLES J. DELAURENTI i MAYOR 41 LAND USE'HEARING EXAMINER 0 *Vo 0 L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 11'60 SEFleg* March 9, 1979 Mr Andrew Deak , ' • , . • , . . . 4509 Talbot Road South •• ', .' : '. .'s ' ',_ •' ' , ., -' .`, '''• :'..;: Renton, WA 98055 1 , . 1 • . ' • • RE: File No. SP-287-79; Andrew Deak Request for Special Permit. • . , Dear Mr. Deak: • • ' , : . - ' , .,„ . ' • ,• •• , This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of February 22,. 1979, has not been appealed within the time period . established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered finl.a and is. being submitted to the City-Clerk'effective this date' for permanent filing. 'Sincer. y,_ ,--- , , • ' , , AI ,....-iii-irligt---2) .. • L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner • • cc: planning Department • , City Clerk . . , . . , . . , . . . • , . . . . . . . , . . . , , . , • . , . . . . ' . , • , . , . ' • . . , • . . AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • State of Washington) ) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and stites: That on the 22nd day of February , 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. 7n 4-t:ee 444 Subscribed and sworn, this A2 -day of ce,\A\uArl •\,‘ ".„ Notary Public in and for tnet,Nstat of Washington, residing atjylte*Mn' • 't r • , ‘• /JAW ,, ,, • (# (.0 .• • Application, Petition or• Case: Andrew Deak; R-286-79, SP-68.7 79 • ee (The minuted contain a to oi the paAtie4 oi 4eco4d) R-286-79 Page Two SP-287-79 The Examiner referenced Section L.4 (Special Permit) pertaining to provision of a minimum aisle width of 24 feet between parking spaces adjacent to the southerly property boundary and the area immediately north; and Section L.7 (Special Permit) requiring a minimum 10- foot setback between the northern property line and the stairs of the proposed structure, and inquired if the conditions can be readily approved: Mr. Clemens responded affirmatively. The Examiner referenced Section L.9 (Special Permit) pertaining to requirement of a 15-foot utility easement adjacent to the south and west property lines, and inquired if the lines would conflict with proposed landscaping designated on Exhibit #7. Mr. Clemens advised that discussion of the matter with the Engineering Division had concluded that 10 feet of property would remain after installation of a five-foot landscaping strip and would provide an acceptable space for location of utility lines. The •Examiner inquired regarding the existing King County zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation for abutting property to the east of the subject site. Mr.' Clemens indicated that prior to annexation of the property to the City of Renton in January, 1979, King County zoning designation was medium density •multifamily, but had been revised to a "G" zoning category upon annexation as required for all annexed property. ' He advised that public use designation would appear to be the proper land use district for the property in the future. The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department. Mr. Clemens indicated the Planning Department recommendation contained in Exhibit #1 would remain as submitted. The Examiner requested additional comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. R-286-79 and SP-287-79 was closed by the Examiner at 9:37 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a rezone of .72 acres from R-2 to P-1 and a site plan of construction of a medical clinic adjacent to an existing medical clinic. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is uncontested, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. • 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance • has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the requirements of Section 4-710 (P-1) and 4-2206 (Parking and Loading Ordinance) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, except for: a. Compliance with the five-foot side yard setback along the northerly property line. b. Compliance with the 24-foot aisle width requirement. The Building Division required • .a 10-foot •setback from the ,northerly property line of the northerly external stairway (Exhibit #1) . 8. A medical clinic exists on the property in a converted residence. An existing garage will be removed pursuant to approval of this application (Exhibit #4) . 9. The staff •recommended revisions to the landscape plan (Exhibit #7) were acceptable to the applicant. 10. The Public Works Department requested a 15-foot utility easement along the southern property line. Within this easement the northerly 10 feet can be used' for landscaping ' (Exhibit #1) . 11. The .previous zoning analysis of the property occurred in 1972 -when. the property was • i\ • February 22, 1979 OFFICE OF TIE' LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. • APPLICANT: Andrew Deak FILE NO. R-286-79 . SP-287-79 • LOCATION: • On the west side of Talbot Road South'between'S..E.' 43rd'"Street and the Renton city limits. ' SUMMARY OF REQUEST; Applicant. seeks approval of a rezone from R-2 to P-1 and a • special permit to allow construction of a 'medical clinic on property located on Talbot Road South between S.W. 43rd 'Street and the Renton city limits. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions. • RECOMMENDATION: ' Hearing Examiner:' Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning .Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on February 16, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: • ' After reviewing the Planning Department report; examining available information on file with the application, , and field checking the property and surrounding area, the ' Examiner conducted a public hearing on the.. subject• as follows: • The hearing was opened on February 20, 1979 at 9:12 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. • Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. ' . It was reported that the.Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: • Exhibit #2: Vicinity Map, 1-200 scale Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map, 1-100 scale' Exhibit #4: Site Plan Exhibit #5: Proposed Landscaping- Plan. ' Exhibit #6; Proposed Building Elevations • ' Exhibit #7: Landscaping Plan with Staff Comments • The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: • Andrew Deak ' 4509 Talbot Road South Renton, WA 98055 • • Mr.. peak indicated his concurrence in the report, and deferred further comments to the designer of the project. Responding was: Robert Zanoni ' 508 West Main • Auburn, WA 98002 ' Mr. Zanoni reported agreement with staff recommendations contained •in Exhibit #1, 'and indicated his intent to conform to all requirements outlined in the report: . • • • The Examiner requested testimony in support or .opposition to the application; There was. no response. He then referenced Section L.3 (Rezone) regarding previous ailowanoe,'of professional office use in the R-2. zone, and inquired if the current'zoning code reflects, • the amendment .to delete .the use. • Mr. Clemens indicated that codes had been updated, to- remove ,professional office use previously allowed by special permit. R-2b6-79 Page Four SP-287-79 ORDERED THIS 22nd day of February, 1979. L. Ric Beeler ' ;Land Use Hearing Examiner • TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of February, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Andrew Deak, 4509 Talbot .Road S. , Renton, WA 98055 Robert Zanoni, 508 West Main, Auburn, WA 98002 TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of February, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 8, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may-make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies• of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. , R-286-79 Page Three • SP-287-79 rezoned to the existing R-2. At that time medical' clinics were permitted in the R-2' zone, but since that time the use has been prohibited. Area land use analysis is currently occurring for this area. of the city. 12. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicated the property to potentially be P-1 (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . 13. Medical clinic construction has substantially consumed the general area surrounding Valley General Hospital. The subject site is located at the,southern' boundary ,cf , . this medical clinic node. A medical clinic is ,located abutting and northerly 'of the property. Testimony did not address timing of this development trend relative to the subject site (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . 14. The property 'easterly and across Talbot Road South from the subject' site was annexed into.,the City of Renton in January Of 1979 and given G zoning. '...The public use designation of the Comprehensive Plan was viewed by staff as most appropriate for that property: 15. Staff found the submitted legal description .to be incorrect. • 16. Off-site improvements are required per Ordinance No. 3214. • CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed rezone, site plan and building design appear, to conform to, the. goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan (Section 4-3014. (B) ) and are an 'appropriate extension of the development pattern in the-area (page 9, Summary, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area, 'July, 1965) . The development plan will, protect,-the southerly residential property (' page 17, "Objective No. 1, Land Use Report,' . ' Comprehensive Plan, July, 1965) .. Additional employment opportunities will be provided to the.area. residents (page 'l7, Objective No. 3, Ibid.),. Appropriate land use' controls are being exercised (page '17, Objective No.' 4, Ibid.) . The proposal will make a positive contribution to the community (page 18, Objective No. 6, Ibid.) . . ' 2. The ". . .general design.and development conform with. the adjacent surroundings. . . " (Section 4-10.3) as suggested to be changed by staff (Exhibit #7) . In order ,to fully comply with this' section and the Comprehensive Plan..as much as possible of the southerly 15 feet of the property should be a landscape screen to adequately buffer the,proposal, from the southerly abutting :single family property. The landscaping plan recommended by staff (Exhibit #7) is appropriate. 3. Noncompliance with. setback and aisle width requirements ' (Finding No. 7) can be satisfactorily resolved by the Planning Department with the applicant. , RECOMMENDATION: ' (Rezone) ' City Council approve the reclassification to P-1 subject to submission. of a correct legal description of the property as required by the Planning Department. DECISION: (Special Permit) Approval of the site plan, Exhibits #6 and 7, subject to: 1. Compliance with building setback and parking aisle width requirements per review and approval of the Planning bepartment. 2. Submission of corrected legal description per requirements of the Planning Department. 3. Completion of off-site improvements per approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments. . • 4. .Except for the area required for:utilities, the southerly 15 feet, is .to be an ' effective landscape 'buffer per Exhibit #7 and per approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments. . 5. City Council approval Of a reclassification to P-1 (File No. R-286-79) . '• • 6. , Compliance with all other applicable ordinances and 'regulations 'of, the, City of,.Rent'on: , • It. I ' �' �I,t. SR -I. • ;F .. „ , i —G960 • ' a -I . . , , 1.r^ IY/ ri h I ` l • .', „..!;,;..,:,: ‘,'„,.,.;";,if ( iI t r'2 r rl , x'i i J '3^ .I f 11 t4'' 4t r'N R'. `l J, it t .,f,t S'' 1 1'4 1,. �•i .II °t . w _I ‘ 1' r. ilr° b II 1 .?,��'.:•,.. j t y Wit, +'a,;�.ti.t' •.r., t+;=et' '� it e 11r+ `I"� :i►.�.. �. ,,r i�++`err:. •.rIO�M` 'd: :.�f'.1, •• '{,. r ''' , I.r. •ANUREWl; PEAK; R-286-19;'.5R--287-'79.' .. 'ANDREW' PEA'K , , ., . �.:72' ac,rea,. ,. : .; ApP� CIIN'tf.' ...� • . . . TOTAL: AREA..., .. .... . ,.. •'° ,. S h't' d out a� T` b `'Rb' Ui a� o a •,,PtI I.NC F'Ay•ACCESS - , ; , �t P •1, wa. ami P' `id ]tis1' T�R 2�`` es en E ,lrS1'ING'`ZONIN6' ,. .. . , .._ r ,. . ;,' ;.',� "�!, � C '.I'e '� - d`' �n a^ 'dical- rofessiona ofi .W X1.ST1'Ncri U5E •.. Surr'.,'• `;'area:develo e 3 to, me p p, 4 ,stalM.�Ib•,1,:e� o 'N +J 1 al` Ji'i��ed n C c C •li;::r.E.. • • • „1>'�'' :P PO' �1Ety. S R 0 ,f,, .Ir, :r't • �t usi`-Publ c b� a"Pu T`ic , ,E• r LAND $ :I.AI Q Comp"E M�'1:0' k S • t:,ry! �It f' ,d n i, r y t 111 '1 �-i `Y.• rA cn°: , , tyi °Jl•, y�II ': `ra i; L: i:'I : tea. t�. i pm � ' s,.; i T`. � fjd ,,,r • 1: Iti,. i, • .1; ,1 qq,,'1 Y.n+ t. • '.a :t++ k7 e•l. p ,asp t. r ` e, K!" ' :y. s;t; 1 rf: :V Ir' '1 le YY '.�. p,.., .f• `F J " ;y r S': ,k•, fir. i�f.' �h r I ✓ "'F ..0 I ty -.I n'r• :'a. r:n: e R 4'r.- u.r ix r ' 's: .s't 'il rA• Y 'Y `I. t a, f, „r" "1'. i.u Y 1 P i s t' 'F 17 t� F. '1' 'M r V rr,.'1� i� ir ..,t 1.ei!n.: ' i' 7 t i��' i.:'i t•. l .1 r':l.'v {� y 4, rr n, i- l `Y 'r 4:i .:a > 'y Ir s�°.,, Yr�,. a%4 it - :r �s r"It;,ii�: -'lam �1'•' . ,y... :.'1F'J t f t ''h' %fir. �'•4 �a. Ik, ,+a ni' e:' .''Fir„ '`� 4 „Jy., r 1•�- •J r A. Q f 1. . 1: Ai': r n -i J, :dr p" p.I, `P'm �� r v t L S ''t 4" t r.. ',b of%::i.: s lit_ :,' � . t a�`,�. to '�tr'ti, 4 ;t-'', a?,,,l'.^F";�, "1. '„�'r�'F. fib'. 4 i':�2 .,.t.ri'"''4 J�:,_e . �it"!.° v .. .. i... ,..._. ._-... „ ..3 .� .. ". .^.,t i:.. .. ...�.r ..,, n 't-r7s ....�"4li;,i'r.n,.r . .'� ...f7':,•a�iii°�L t✓"S�.!'..„ "1.:: k,"f.'�.3'f,,:nV,T!}r..{1't.�tire. „,i,.;g,,'it,•-4!,;.-,•iI.!,At#•.•'•rip.:,•:•••••,o',••!•t 't,o,-;'-••,,r--•,s:-'''-'-='-'-.•!3,7;r.'-"'•-•I':'n'll'"•,".•,,,•,',.,„ . `,`,”" iii .i': :•'-',4%.a.` .t4 .; Duatiigs og s i i', , ; A, 1Z & .• : ,,!7at "7,76'''''.. . „ . „,be 440.4......a,” .4;Y:,;., ,aiiivi,3094v Hawn , i i t 1111 q hi' i 1 pi:.s•i " . , . , , ' : ',. ' .;11,;r. , i • . • 1 s 1 c.,, -• 1,', ', '1:';:r:,4,ri:;'',;''''.'•:":: : 1 I Pal III ,, I 1 a I 1,1:* • . „ • , I I , 4 Ill i ;.y.',-1 111.! I 1 ' II lilio 1 1111111 ' ' ,,,' y. , '.".";. '.(,,.;,';4.:, .' : "r" . ' diK/fiti#t eis0.4 •AV O' i i I ;pin!! ' iiiiii * ) f s 1 '1 '',,t• I IA egill ai i'' 1111111 • - i `4i, ' `...'• .: 11 Is if if li,, i . , • s., .. 1 • ,i• 11,11111.91 ,,,-• ,,,•?' .,. As II alls..11 lat.' M-----7=-..... • i _ ...• 'lip • ie - .-,., 6: . (14,0101 . • , 1 •..kz vi:.. 1 Z ' 44i 401 , ..,.:,.. v1 (VA, , if - (;)-•f,:i.,, t f;ic.=2*, ..• " rgl• 0:\ It;, ' i.1.0 . ( Vi • .3 . 4 '' ; Sl. • X t.t. j fh • . 45 li : AO • il , t1V‘. 11113 / • • . .4's t I ', I, `,) ::,.. J Q. • AI ; r I1 , *.• •i ; , •V '$ IV • !': I 7 le, $ V i I v.1 I 'St (0 „ . , ••• •,,,, a JI <>./' • ,d1 k l ' i,,, L.• ::. 0‘‘ , • „,,, 5! • , A , „ A = , :. • ‘1r.-0.• 4,K- , )'''.-",'',. 1 7-"".• 7 '{ --: . )1.---41. ,..4 , - • \'.I VA• C'(i ' I 4 1 .__... •IV/ CITY OF RENTON - _ APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY File No'. SP- Date Rec' d. /--„?..? - 7' Application Fee $-//C'. ` Receipt No . 71t4 Environmental Review Fee $may C eef, / '17,pr1�L2 47,/,//eS rez ..,e at�sca, APPLICANT TO ,COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name Andrew Deak (Valley Dermatogoly Clinic) Phone 22S-4520 Address 4509 Talbot Road Renton,• Washington 98055 2 . Property location, : ,.3. Legal /� descripp�)tion (attach additional sheet if necessary) '//j F ill jzoca et, cks 3 L. r_ (0 pr, Kt 1 a 971, of ufH . 4 . Number of acres or square feet .7175 acres Present Zoning R 2 '` 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Medical.Clinic 6 ., The following information shall be submitted with this application: " A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 16' or 20 ' B, Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) - . . 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) . E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in ' Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above. • 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION: F Rom . Date Approved 61R-‘ 4��.. Date Denied. EcFlI/Ep �o� Date Appealed JAN 22 197P Appeal Action \\ .� ............. =JL 9/ ' Remarks / DEPP��'� Planning Dept. , 1-775/` , . F CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' . egENE11 Of li)4N) JAN 22 1979 • i FOR OFFICE USE ONLY -n::.' ' -. J . � �r . Application No. �.7�C 7�% /`i`' r' )i`'7 � -o ���� Environmental Checklist No. `et- ✓,4,' '-i<, .-.-.....- . PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: ' ® Declaration of Significance . ®Declaration of Significance . ; i DDeclaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy' Act of .1971, Chapter` 43.21C, RCN, requires • • . all state and local governmental, agencies to 'consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment'. The purpose of this checklist is to help the, agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or .where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should . include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal . not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. ' NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the- questions may not apply to your proposal ., If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. . Name of Proponent Andrew Desk (Valley Dermatol-oc�y Clinic) 2. Address and phone number of Proponent:. . y r..' .. 4509 Talbot Road . . • ',Renton,' Washington 98055 . 1 . 228-4521 o 3. Date Checklist submitted • 4..-. Agency requiring Checklist Rezone City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: . Rezone Current R-2 to P-1 ' Luc-' • ' ® vp pr,pa c.5 F � 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements. and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): • - . Rezone Medical Clinic and apply for site approval property to build anew building on site R 2 Zone permitted existing_ structure on site to be used as a Medical Clinic (July, 1973) , and has been used for past 5 years. Due to work load and community needs, a new structure is needed to run the Dermatology Clinic., -2- , 7. .. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well ',r: ( , as. the'+extentof. the' land area affected by any environmental impacts, including ' ,. 'r,.. -� any'otherainformation needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- ,! ' mental settineof the proposal ) : '' ~� 1.-The property is about 500 yeards south of Valley General Hospital. • ',I.-,e -... 'and"has•been,'functioning as a Medical Clinic for 5 years. • • . V. , 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : August 1, 1979 . • 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : Rezone to P-1 Zoning ___.....____.__..._...._._ Building permit for new structure on site. . ' ,10. 'Do you have.any plans. for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this, proposal-? If yes,-explain: . '' Yes - a new'approximately 4,000-square-foot-building will be built . ' on site. • _. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the, pro- posal ; if none has been .completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YET— MAYBE NO . (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO • (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X features? V!T RUM" R 0- • (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X unique geologic or physical features? YET— MAYBE — (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils. X either on or off the site? YES NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the . bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? } V!3 MAYBE i — f: Explanation: • u„ 4: tit r+ �". -3_ . (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Air emissions or deterioration of' ambient air ' , quality?` , X , . i YET- ' O • MAYBE N (b) The creation of objectionable odors? ': X a i 'YES- MAYBE ' N ' (c) Alteration 'of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or , regionally? ' ' ' ' X 1 r YES • MAYBE NO Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: , , (a) Changes in currents, or the course' of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? ' X . YES-� MA B NO ' (b) Changes in 'absorptio'n rates, drainage patterns, or . ' the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ,, X '. ' YES )IAYBE NO . (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? ' X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the .amount.of surface water in any water ' body? X YES . MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to • temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE 6— (f) Alteration of the direction or rate 'of flow of ' ground waters? - X V- TAYNE NO • ' . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? .X_ -- - - YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne .virus or bacteria, • or other substances into the ground waters? X ' ' - ES MAYBE ' IFO (-I) Reduction in the amount' of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X V— MAYBE AZ" Explanation:` ' • (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:. . (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any . species of flora (including trees,. shrubs, grass, crops, • microflora and aquatic plants)? X MAYBE au- . • (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X YE' RAM NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X vrr MAYBE O (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? • X YES MAYBE Explanation: Property that building iS going to iw. PrPrt 9 on has no old growth flora • -4- . ., • as f ' (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: P (a) Changes in• the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X VES MAYBE, NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X Y MAYBE 0— (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • • (6) ' Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE N Explanation; • (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES WATOE W . Explanation: • • (8) 'Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the X present or planned land use of an area? V- MAYBE NO Explanation: . (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X ES WATT WATTE NO Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) X in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YET- MAYBE Explanation: (11) bution, density.lorh growth e orate sal aofe the r hhuman e a ri populatiotion, nn - of an area? TM' gun Explanation: y 5 ` -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X V YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: ' (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X ' , YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects!on' existing parking facilities, or demand for_,new'.parking? . X 1 ' YES MATTE NO ("c) -Impact 'upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE Nf (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or ' movement of people and/or goods? X YEB MAYBE NO (e) - Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X Y - ' MAYBE NO (f) ,, Increase in traffic haiards. to motor vehicles, X bicyclists or pedestrians?. ' VE 1IAYBE N0 . Explanation:. • • (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services ' • in any_ of the following areas: • (a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? YES MA B N- • (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO (d)' Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (15) . Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?. X YES ' Ml B NO (b)• Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X • A YES _AY, Explanation: , , • (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new , systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? • X YES RAM" NO (b) Communications systems? * X. YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO * Added telephone lines already reserved l - r -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYS NO (e) Storm water drainage? X YES RATUE N3 (f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X VT MAYBE W Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic ,vista. or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive ; . site open to public view? X YET- MBE NO Explanation: • • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE 0- Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X ((S MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. 04244/ Proponent: u,, (signe ) pew fiscu (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • AFFIDAVIT • • I, Andrew 'Peak, M.D. , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and swor before me • this / 6 day of , 19' 2? . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at b/ii;k . atary Public) (Signature of Owner) /27ao IIJ./_", E' 14-e • 4509 Ta.2bot Road South (Address) • (Address) • Renton. Glaahingtovi (City) (State) • . 228-4-520 (Telephone) • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application ha -`,inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in 0V ular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Rent 41 � rtment governing the filing of such application . R �� ci JAN 22 1979 Date Received , 19 By: • ?")E1:45‘•c Ren anning Dept : 2-73 OF ! o THE CITY OF RENTON U t © Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 oWL CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR a PLANNING DEPARTMENT A �• 235- 2550 0,9gTED SEP�E���P January 24 , 1979 Dr . Andrew Deak 4503 Talbot Road Renton , WA 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATIONS FOR REZONE FROh•1 R-2 TO P-1, File R-286-79, and SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT MEDICAL CLINIC IN A P-1 ZONE, File R-287-79; property located on Talbot Road South between South 43rd Street and the Renton City Limits Dear Dr. Deak: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 22, 1979 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Nearing Examiner has been set for February 20, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . E,r,i cksen Planning D rector / 4,/ (/ .B 1/0 t • igh y ' David R. Clemens Associate Planner cc : Zanoni & Associates 508 West Main Auburn , WA 98002 Attn : Robert A . Zanoni I ` a NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON FEBRUARY 20 , 19 79 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PET T ONS : • 1. L. ALICE HANBEY/KATHRYN E. BELAN, APPLICATION FOR • REZONE FROM GS-1 TO R-2, File R-288-79; property located in the vicinity of 822 Monroe Avenue N.E. 2. L. ALICE HANBEY/KATHRYN E. BELAN, APPLICATIONS FOR THREE-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL, File 289-79; WAIVER • OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, File W-290-79; AND EXCEPTION TQ THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RE. LOT WIDTH AND PIPESTEM LOTS, File E-297-79 and E-298-79; property located in the vicinity of 822 Monroe Avenue N.E. ANDREW DEAK, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2 TO P-1, File R-286-79; property located on Talbot Road South • between South 43rd Street and the Renton City Limits.' 4. ANDREW DEAK, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT MEDICAL CLINIC IN A P-1 ZONE, File SP-287-79; property located on Talbot Road South between South 43rd Street and the Renton City Limits. 5. GEORGE OBERHOLTZER (WINDSTAR SUBDIVISION) , APPLICATIONS FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL APPROVAL OF 14-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION, Files PP-295-79 and FP-296-79; property located in the vicinity of N.E. 24th Street and Union Avenue N.E. Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. • ALL INTERESTED :PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 20, 1979 AT 9:00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED February 9, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION STEVE MUNSON . , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY. DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the 7th day of February , 19 79 SIGNED - 7)46-14 r//2 , , , ,.. , , „ ''''''''''''s ,-,-7t. '''.,A •,,' ''' ',,,1" it F A 4 tp , '6 1:?, O'ili e: It h Co; :,:i73,177j Xi ,' \<01,•,,Y'. t!- ',,-4 ,) .1, 1:4', "i7 i7IVV: ,t,, ' ' •."-V4-: .tc, ':„'`kkx: ',- .4 i, 4 ...,,, ,, •.:',:k ,sk e :,.? :1'.' L A '.' X:1 .14i ''"4 ..,r ,,,. ,,,,. • + ,,:it; .,1,e ,,ii ,o, :r-,, x, i li -; ,,• 0,1. ,'1, \ , GENE :. LOCATIO . 9 N AND lie.) ADDRESS: a PROPERTY LOCATED ON TALBOT ROAD SOUTH BETWEEN SOUTH 43RD STREET AND THE RENTON CITY LIMITS. LEGAL IFESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT, US POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF -1, :. *.tii :,1 ',It' l' ;S' .. r .. ' j, ,':' 1 . 1, 1.. ';`' i ''., :',. , %, •, 4 . , .. , , - v 4•14......., Ti OE HELD ON CITY COUNCIL CHAitiBERS9 VUNICIPAL BUILDING ON FEBRUARY 20, 1979 BEGI -NNING AT 9 :00 A.M. P.M. CONCErMiNG FETA El FROM R-2 TO P-1 „J.,. e „. F.," to E. {ix,. PE 7T,RA ..,T 1 0 CONSTRUI MD I QAL CLINIC IN A .a. ,•, r tl ., ' A' [‘./E-R , ., „„, , t.,,, ...,.... ... e.,,.. •r•-•n r Ix n R, M AW r , 1,111V Or 11.— III i 11 C)ri t,LitrkIL:3 RfilArmAGEWk u ft- k.... ft DR i-, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS Nil TICE NOT TO : REMOVED WITHOUT PRIPPER AUTHORIZATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ANDREW DEAK, File Nos : R-286-79 , SP-287-79 FEBRUARY 20 , 1979 PAGE TWO 2 . Soils : Alderwood (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , row crops , and urban development . 3 . Vegetation : The site has been asphalted for parking and some landscaping is included . The westerly boundary contains some small shrubs and a few evergreen trees . The same pattern is found in the northerly and southerly property lines. 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: No surface water was evidenced on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : An existing structure in the westerly portion of the subject site is presently used as a medical clinic for dermatology. Other medical clinics are located to the north and east of the property . Valley General Hospital is to the north along S . E . 43rd Street . An attorney ' s office is to the east across Talbot Road South and two single family residences are located on the properties to the south . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding area is developed into a medical -professional complex with some scattered single family residences on the fringes . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: A 12" water main extends north-south on Talbot Road South adjacent to the subject site . An 8" sanitary sewer is located on Talbot Road approximately 100 ' north of the subject site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #145 operates along S .W. 43rd Street- within 1 /8 of a mile to the north of the subject site . 4. Schools : The subject site is not in close proximity to any existing schools and the proposed project will not have an effect on existing schools . 5 . Recreation : The subject site is slightly over one mile south of Talbot Hill Park . In addition , the grounds of Valley General Hospital may provide some recreational opportunities . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-708 , R-2 , Residence Two Family . 2 . Section 4-71U , P-1 , Public District. H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , Summary, pages 9 and 10 . 2 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , Pages 17 and 18 . • I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff and - have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . However , through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 20 , 1979 APPLICANT : ANDREW DEAK FILE NUMBER : R-286-79 and SP-287-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant seeks approval of a rezone from R-2 to P-1 and a special permit to allow construction of a medical clinic on property located on Talbot Road South between S . W. 43rd Street and the Renton City limits . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : ANDREW DEAK 2 . Applicant: ANDREW DEAK 3 . Location : On the west side of Talbot (Vicinity map attached ) Road South between S . E . 43rd Street and the Renton City Limits . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : ± . 72 Acre 6 . Access : Via Talbot Road South 7 . Existing Zoning : R-2 , Residential Two Family ; Minimum lot size 7200 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R-3 , Residential Multiple , Family ; "G" , General Classification District ; P-1 , Public Use . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Public/Quasi -Public 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on February 9 , 1979 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on February 7 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2394 dated March 26 , 1968 . It was rezoned from "G" to R-2 by Ordinance #2711 dated June 16 , 1972 . D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography: ,The site slopes downward from east to west at just under a 10% slope . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY. REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ANDREW DEAK, File Nos : R-286-79 , SP-287-79 FEBRUARY 20 , 1979 PAGE FOUR M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : (REZONE) Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of the proposed rezoning as being compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and increased medical /clinic development in the area , and subject to the following conditions : 1 . Submission of a revised and corrected legal description prior to final City Council action . 2 . Provision of a sight obscuring landscape screen along the south property line to separate any proposed use from the adjoining single family residence . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : (SPECIAL PERMIT) 1 . Although the subject site is presently zoned for professional service office use , a rezone to P-1 (Public Use) would allow for such a development by Special Permit . Together with appropriate design treatment regarding landscaping , screening , and setbacks , the site could be suited for such a use . 2 . The subject proposal is compatible with the existing land uses and zoning in the general area . Similar clinic-type structures and medical -dental facilities exist in the area on the property or are proposed for future development . 3 . The existing building on the northwest portion of the site currently houses a medical clinic . The applicant proposes to construct a 2-story facility to the east which will accommodate a dermatology clinic . The structures will have to meet all code requirements of the Building Division . The proposed building is two stories (daylight basement) with the lower story currently proposed for storage . The existing building will remain . If the lower story of the new building is used for office/clinic purposes , additional parking will be required . The proposed building conforms to all requirements of the P-1 District . 4. The conceptual site plan meets ordinance requirements for the following : a . Parking. required : 41 spaces Parking Provided : 42 spaces b . The minimum aisle width of 24 ' between the spaces adjacent to the southerly property boundary and the area immediately north may not have been provided . One additional foot may need to be provided to meet the standard of the Parking and Loading Ordinance . 5 . The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department advises that off-site improvements such as curb., gutter, sidewalk and additional paving will be required along Talbot Road South as part of site development . In addition , storm water detention will need to be provided (see attached comments . ) 6 . The Fire Department indicates that additional hydrants and watermains will have to be installed and serviceable for adequate protection of the existing and proposed structures . Provision of a turnaround at the end of the western parking area and satisfactory aisleway grades will be required by the Fire Department (see attached comments) . 7 . A minimum 10-foot setback is required between the north property line and the stairs of the proposed new building (see Building Division comment) . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO TH.E HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ANDREW DEAK, File Nos : R-286-79 , SP-287-79 FEBRUARY 20 , 1979 PAGE THREE 2. Population/Employment : Some increase in employment opportunities may result from this new facility . 3 . Schools : Not Applicable . ' 4. Social : Development of the site may result in increased social interaction on the site as well as in the surrounding area . 5 . Traffic : The proposed development will generate approximately 600 (75 weekday trips/1000 square feet of gross floor area • times 7 ,820 square feet) additional vehicle trips . On Talbot Road South , the 1978 traffic counts indicate 6 ,016 trips . Therefore , the development will result in approximately a 10% traffic increase in the immediate area . The Traffic Engineering Division advises that the existing street and circulation system will satisfactorily handle the greater volumes . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significant impact has been prepared based upon the proposed minor addition to existing use of the property , and subject to adequate screening and landscaping treatment. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : (REDONE) 1 . The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use element which designates the site as public/quasi public . 2 . The proposed rezoning is intended to allow' for expansion of the existing clinic use on the property . The requested P-1 zoning would allow expanding the clinic to a new building proposed under the Special Permit also a part of this request. 3 . The current R-2 zoning previously allowed professional offices uses . The most recent amendments removed this allowance . 4. The site is in the general proximate of' the Valley General Hospital and numerous other medical -clinic uses . 5 . The Planning Commission is considering at this time the entire southeast area of the Comprehensive Plan . The site was rezoned R-2 in 1972 after annexation in 1968. 6 . Considerable medical /clinic construction has occurred in the vicinity of the site , including additions to Valley General Hospital . The proposed clinic expansion appears consistent withadjoining activity of this nature . 7 . Suitable landscape hedge/screening should be required separating the proposed expanded use from the single family residence to the south . This can be implemented in the accompanying Special Permit application . . • • .. , .. 1 , 1 4— . I, „ . c , .9 �' I P , — 11 I I 1. �f. ., Q lx _ z.. z .. - - l) l°I V, P. .;1to :9 30I ,, ! r— 4 , r, l Qi _—°r �'1J, 'i t , .;, r 4 .,..t ,,,,....T,::. r __ ;'t-'--I -L I 1 '---- ' ‘! ---1 7 7-— fif 11/1 i // \ ly j t l/ I 29 30 31 32, 33 �,\ I� / In 1 • 3E I„�s, ,q f/i/e 9 ro ,S III \ / °J;13 .2131 . ,„1 I IG 2� 24 8,•0, .., z fir i I 1 I /2,,,7 a z1)�23 ‘...- _I4 IB ,, 20 22 ! 4S nn ''1 L� ` • .'1 � L •— ���a_ • {I ���. .>ffx••m--as• ��•_• r .-._._ J—..RO.ve of0 Y 1 ) , • ? /• ..r Htl o �� i 1 N. G � bl ., ' 1 � e 1 L 1 4 1 } ANDREW DEAK: R-286-79 , SP-287-79 1 . .• I F • •) APPLICANT ANDREW DEAK TOTAL AREA ±• 72 acre i , Via Talbot Road South PRINCIPAL ACCESS ? S EXISTING ZONING R-2, Residential Two Family ; EXISTING USE Surrounding area developed into a medical-professional complex with -fey , t ' PROPOSED USE Medical Clinicti COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public/Quasi-Public 1 Y COMMENTS 3 J • I. i M n • J i a.wr..,rwr.:t ,....•.rrrty—.rwef,..wsw+.-nr,n•:r:.e.twe-r�...». wrev ... +-.-+,*••,,.•ew..rx.r...YY rr,.RSY�I �txw., ..+. ..+,».rw+,aw,srr;rc..:»..+r ...w .,.. • ».. .w.rW, -. ., v..e.u.w��•.w-,n .r..�..,.w.r.e_..u.r• x..v..se.ww PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING :. ANDREW DEAK, File Nos : R-286-79 , SP-287-79 FEBRUARY 20 , 1979 PAGE FIVE 8 . A 5-foot wide landscape strip is required adjacent to the public right-of-way of Talbot Road South and 10 ' is provided . Additional screening and landscaping may be necessary along the perimeter and throughout the interior of the subject site . The conceptual landscape plan appears to address shrubbry in these areas adequately . Specific requirements of size , spacing , number , and types of tree planting to be provided will need to be included in submittal of the . detailed landscape plan . The minimum landscaping depth should be increased to 5 ' . 9 . The Utilities Engineering Division advises that an easement will be necessary at 15 ' adjacent to the south and west property lines . A sewer extension will also be required . A portion of this may have to be pumped . Standard hookup charges for water and sewer also apply (see attached comments ) . • 10 . The site is near the hospital and other clinics in the area . . The building elevations appear to be consistent with contemporary northwest architecture and in harmony with similar structures in the area . Together with these and other criteria , the site is very appropriate for the proposed clinic use . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : (SPECIAL PERMIT) Recommend approval of the special permit request for a proposed clinic subject to the following conditions : 1 . Final Hearing Examiner' s and City Council approval of the rezone request (R-286-79 ) . 2 . Correction of the deficiencies regarding parking stall layout as addressed in number 4 of the analysis . 3. Provision of off-site improvements including curb , gutter , sidewalk and landscaping along all the public right-of-way adjacent to the subject site . 4 . Final Public Works Department approval of detailed drainage plans including adequate storm water detention . 5 . Final Fire Department approval of hydrant locations and adequacy of the proposed turnaround . 6 . Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscape plans to be submitted at the time of building permit application . 7 . Provision of adequate utilities and payment of standard hookup fees as per Utilities Engineering Division requirements . 8. Final Planning Department approval of exterior building elevations . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: Q . Finance Department 4 Fire Department �./ II Li 'wary Department Park Department Police Department 1r Public Works Department r,< O Building Div . OEngineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio 1 O T affic Engineering Div . and 0 ' Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his desi nee) 111 Uti5W/ge DATE : / q 4/ PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : LOCATION : • APPLICATION( S) : -' 79 /42? IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING e �I�N RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : - -- D-Approved lila Approved Comments or conditions : / A � /21 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : f Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • ® r r�� ( 0, . 0 );—. — '60 --. , k, - , „1---*, ___ __* -,i, , opoo , . : 7_,. .._„.... ..„„,.. ,„ \L ,•• , WO ---- - i'''''< • /--._.:, . , 1 , 4- tt�o(dea ........„ .,_Qz., i . . r,, I / .,k v. ') • - . . 4'L -7).. . . _ 0 o-ostd , _. • 0 \ ,..,., • fils. . . . . _ • _p aroSED 1 'UII-PING Gael _// 6„..__ ..., l/ (\ld i— • CI( .1 slbh✓ t0 or / 7 D• � ' ''ri 1.,.1 a �y�(t / i «. ---- -- e ND ? . - - w -. s 'bit�._- / - 4 ,' .,.."4,s.•.-.:•-.,__,-, 01.., dd . -, (/��p O L to �� • '� K . k V y-i;—----,. _ *,.' v 0 itil_i___ Add,ttlGitill k NI' cl' ,, ,...,,,,,,, i : : ''• /;,410, Alr, ' i ''. * Wa.., . nV�..._- - r. ? c 314 ( tQ^.� ° red !L1� ;\1 )-'r- i,�(l .l dgn P11mE]dY R-50�t1W /` �p .r. ` ` � �. - G4 i• Cves ea.. tag Noon l The eroR tY sieves gently b.ob the fbt,:nay fern Ta7Lot Ibsd Saab. 4m roil s W i�\�_/ (q, A V • Pw�O KToc leave vr�+C�'� to be LeR.L. - L L 41` ' 0 6 `V \ _4i, -_ _ ___ �� re ar.u... Item ace.nWsr of ecun ccan entering m the P�.tY:ram cm confer.,atlas en F T 1 ' _- " erntmw. y C I( - y Me effect v We of.ples+alY t[cR• y UitdH M DMUS.= ztn.~ m • As a�7 eag et/4g trams vil.to,e- It ioa el la t.gnarly 1Gle to Apl7mla"pit' Cis C ma goring on the PaWerty. Atl propoem gb..lopornt is starred enema d sada to tat ,� n /! ten otiata g tree goat.... L O/fJP. - �� 5 �yA r'� m.mw...,evergreen=non gioue be..t.4ltmae alas melt raga Want.,e Smith Ptat.ta -4 1- liree. fie:eaw..ri11 are m mlv.n ue rtrAb eien4.ettt P�e1'n t+11 as N' L �. /B/ . 2�r C'°� . 5'OLD tmU tarn ;a w tA`�°t� °��°.�;t,.l�'m.,�1 .� / ."-. nd.Pt y45 P�theala to eatablitivd. /j All the oea sot].on the tract ecola m filial.grade!into[ladan rn.e.d mittens ma ►'a WI a.e- • _ _/,{�,/1J j o/e i�n4/ ,,y platted:.m grams.. re grans..e m n.latw.!m Iran gwd.te,. mat.a,n.l effect pp. /Q�f G (�G✓L� V,y�/e dwld Una of.vary ettrss3w.mien Part. c • ® I,t klY .a MAST 739f • - / /{�� • JaC c.rieto.e sir ,,.- �� 1 M.tmin Aquitolna-Plant 6'o.c.to tons 6'Ugh e¢sog lt'-70' / 7os y 2 andoeedrw-Aao4a l large corning vart.ete ha -76' ej an ' fv 7 t eeggeen imams-Annsmd vacletie. -as,. �i�It r t aeons-Mmkl Wan ryVnaa S•-6• f L Crhlee caner* t _5 p9 rd�ttc 6 Q+naer-Fees Manna-CiTtaol- rRe ca •• -r%_I•• : 6 ]ankano a4e.a Meal.*-Met Amapa 70'-)6' .io 76-iC -; •. - 7 Jgwpma rnlbia P9tvs3r.-nano-Golden Poet.Amiteee 1t'-la' - . -. 2 \ r � ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department oPark Department ® •61ice Department ID Public Works Department ,�.we ® &I3` lding Div. ® Engineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio O .'nxf0.�•11u4.YNMC1w:l.v'...•.'.:.k•... , G.m,Ys^µ�Traffic Engineering ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his desi nee) DATE : / q 7/ PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : rlC A'44 LOCATION : 6 �® V496/ eg/ APPLICATION(S) : /OF 6 " Y�9 2 i/a/i1 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : �:z. �r, f, ;• lr , .O En Approved d1J Not Apprr'oved Comments or conditions :. ^i • 77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative---- .- Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department ® Public ells Department Building Div. ® Engineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio OTraffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his desi nee) tDATE : 7, PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : Ae LOCATION : D APPLICATION(S) : " 79 2 ... IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING p e RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: —DC- — E J Approved L1-Not Approved Comments or conditions :. ,i, p f�R-�� /__,.----1-),Z24-', (L.., /-fl - ) 7 ( Signat r'e �f Director or Authorized Represen ative Date 1 . HAZARD IDENTIFICATION IN-""°NATION .NAME '7 77- ).f�� zozwk U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD • ADDRESS �3 �e ��'Gj % ,.�" . FIRE MANAGEMENT AREA nr DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE) : I - II IV III - V FIRE-RESISTIVE - NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (Note: If "Mixed" , see Special Instructions for Area an t Fire Flow) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND 'FLOOR AREA: 4(. 3441 ft2 NUMBER OF STORIES: x . 2 TOTAL BUILDING AREA: � esl.� ft2(A) • 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1 , USING AREA (A) : �G'G GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: ,- C25 GPM (C) If low Hazard, Subtract up to 25% of (B) ; If High Hazard, Add up to 25% of (B) . 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C) : /I75' GPM (D) (If B+C is less than 500 GPM, insert 500 GPM) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: 0 GPM (E) (If completely sprinklered, subtract up to 50% of (D) ; If light hazard occupancy and fire resistive or non-combustible construction, subtract up to 75% of (D) . ) 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: Using the table at left as a guide, enter the separation and adjustment for each of the "four faces" of the building in the table at the right: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT ' EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJUSTMENT 0 - 10 25% max. North Add 11 - 30 20% max. East Add % 31 - 60 15% max. South Add • % 61 - 100 10% max. West /j/ Add ?,5 101 - 150 5% max. Total % of Adjustment 150 or 4-hr wall 0% max. (not to exceed 75%) : % (Total % adjustment times (D) ) ADJUSTMENT: - L/K;R 7 GPM (F) J. DETERMINE ROOF COVERING ADJUSTMENT: ' (If wood shingle roof covering, add 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: - GPM (G) 10: COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (II D+E+F+G is less than 500 GPM, insert 500 GPM. ) 21 3 ,3, (If D+E+F+G is greater than 12,000 GPM, insert 12,000 GPM. ) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: GPM (H) � DATE: ,�°2..2C/21 11 . SIGNED: � �'"�'-` � - • • • • MEMCPI. • NDUM TO: David R. Clemens, Associate Planner 1/26/79 FROM: Fire Prevention Bureau SUBJECT: Application #'s E3-286-79, SP 287-79, fire department requirements 1. Must meet ISO fire flow requirements. 2. Must meet Uniform Fire Code 1976 edition for occupancy approval. 3. Fire hydrant number and location to be approved by the Fire Chief. 4. Egress and access to be approved by the Fire Chief. 5. Water main and fire hydrant installation, type to meet Water Engineering requirement. 6. Portable fire extinguishers as for Fire Chief's approval. 7. Fire hydrants and water mains to be installed and serviceable prior to start of,:.b5Jilding construction. • , E.V. W ton, Jr. , Inspector EVW:pr • • ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : o Finance Department . Fire Department Library Department Park Department PuQP lice Department blic Works Department 0 wilding Div. • Engineering Div. (Please verify legal descriptio OTraffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his desinee) kin eaDATE : a , PLEASE R VIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : ,(9 , /11'14 LOCATION : T7fI/ G / 51'° APPLICATION (S) : 5//, /7 gi 7 9 ilaaCt1/ ¼/a' IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING E RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ,, -/ : I; .,.:, :::;;;r.L CD Approved L=3 Not Approved Comments or conditions : • / Z9- 7 Date Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department Park Department 0 Police Department 0 Public Works Department 0 Building Div. Deering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio 4 Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his desi •nee ) ) :/Z1 e (/ //, ,. DATE : / f9, PLEASE R VIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : LOCATION : ?like igiv tr. APPLICATION(S ) : , ? V "' ,, '/'/7 #f 7 9 /ioi(edy di/di IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARINGS ' 9 . RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : j REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : -<7;:e2 74 a Department : 5 (!' Approved Not Approved 'C•`, ents or conditions : C‹- ,),: 7e:---..`f r. z_z___ ,/, ' ..,:-- z,-- ----7:'----...,___ / -' Date Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department B - tiding Div. Cr Engineering Div. OTraffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) � 9 ie de ' #431 Azgva SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ® ®9 ; Application No . : Action Name : aloe s® /717J ''. '} Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : r', ;, , ,7 Comments : 1\/0 n� (� ,�. -.¢,, / ,- Z r - 7 ti Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS -' TO: (2) ance Department.. . 0 Fire Department ; .`�^� �Library Department hi i Park Department / II Police Department ./ 0 Public Works' Department • Building Div. �� Engineering ,^Div. : .- ,/ •''fic Engineering Div . 4 ',, ,.. 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM:, Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his ',',s.' designee) AO ke d4/0101.9/ 9 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- AV°19 . i Application No . : . 7, Action Name : Er 0 doe,/ 44,4'43 g 41,$o xvie, Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : Note : Responses to be written in ink. , , f - , REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : -7L-i,�5 Comments : gee- / i 4.4are/ii'10/1-7v Q7,1 3 / 4 C A 7 r--5.----- 6,..„, Signature of Direct r or Authoriz d- Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : tooliCS Comments : GPySU-- ' a0Qt,“ac,� v1Jpta_ who-'IBC 6a6N510.14 ac,s(rtw0 -0.A/ sa Ft i,✓dcsti, .- szi.Jt:fL- II h^ sevv//(, exty sSi m° j.aro,w zuo. •.— .1"'Otto b, V.')a A.'y 1 viti. ro •PW" pl aj 0:1L Q %, --- V 4 75 Signatur0(of Director r or Authorized Re resIgtive Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department ® Public W•rfd Department 0-Building Div. 0 Engineering Div . ® Traffic Engineering Div. c Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ° e ® .9 9 Application No . : , > ': Action Name : re, / 4 .. �' :' i ,. � r dded 61444 tiPiA7A/- i/f-- Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : ciel Note : Responses to be written in ink. e' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPA(SLST) TMENTS : Department : Comments : •�c� ��7 i 7 Signature 2Tirector or . Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Q Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department ® Public Works Department 8 Building Div. cfineering Div . Traffic Engineering Div. O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his designee) a/ ... P & g(/ ' a SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 1 ' ®�7'e� ; Application No . : , ^ .7, y Action Name : ®, awe? ow , , . . Please review the attached. Review requested by (date ) : Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : / --;-- 2_112C/c 77 4-7 ('''C. Y- )1. -1 Comments : 1 l /V p i Lc • rt c a / "-^G q J &,.."--..2‹........._ G- j'<<f,,,..� 'cd L / Date Signature of Director or Authorized Representative , PROPOSED/FINAL 3LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE _ IN-SIGNIFICANCE Application No , R-286-79 , SP-287-79 ' PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No.. 424-79 X FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Approval of rezone from R-2 to R-1 and special permit to allow construction of a medical clinic on property located on Talbot Road South between S.W. 43rd Street and the Renton City Limits. Proponent ANDREW DEAK Location of Proposal Talbot Rd South, between S.W. 43rd and Renton City Limits Lead Agency This proposal has been determined to ® have ;Mt not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is ® is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental/nsoi gni fi cance : has been issued based upon the proposed minor addition to existing use of the property, and subject to adequate screening and landscaping treatment. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen ' Title Pl,. ning Director 2m ®, Date 2 Signature //LII l � , • City of Renton Planning Department . 5-76 •