Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Final Agenda Packet
CITY OF RENTON AGENDA - City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, September 16, 2024 Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way Please note that this regular meeting of the Renton City Council is being offered as a hybrid meeting and can be attended in person at the Council Chambers, 7th floor of City Hall, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, 98057 or remotely through Zoom. For those wishing to attend by Zoom: Please (1) click this link https://us02web.zoom.us/j/84938072917?pwd=TUNCcnppbjNjbjNRMWpZaXk2bjJnZz09 (or copy/paste the URL into a web browser) or (2) call-in to the Zoom meeting by dialing 253-215- 8782 and entering 849 3807 2917 Passcode 156708, or (3) call 425-430-6501 by 5 p.m. on the day of the meeting to request an invite with a link to the meeting. Registration for Audience Comment: Registration will be open at all times, but speakers must register by 5 p.m. on the day of a Council meeting in order to be called upon. Anyone who registers after 5 p.m. on the day of the Council meeting will not be called upon to speak and will be required to re-register for the next Council meeting if they wish to speak at that next meeting. Request to Speak Registration Form: o Click the link or copy/paste the following URL into your browser: https://forms.office.com/g/bTJUj6NrEE You may also call 425-430-6501 or email jsubia@rentonwa.gov or cityclerk@rentonwa.gov to register. Please provide your full name, city of residence, email address and/or phone number, and topic in your message. A sign-in sheet is also available for those who attend in person. Video on Demand: Please click the following link to stream Council meetings live as they occur, or to select previously recorded meetings: Renton Channel 21 Video on Demand 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PROCLAMATION a) Hispanic Heritage Month - October 2024 4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT a) Administrative Report 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS All remarks must be addressed to the Council as a whole, if a response is requested please provide your name and address, including email address, to the City Clerk to allow for follow-up. Speakers must sign-up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed three minutes. When recognized, please state your name & city of residence for the record. NOTICE to all participants: Pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17A.555, campaigning for or against any ballot measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting, including the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED. 6. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of September 9, 2024. Council Concur b) AB - 3662 Community & Economic Development Department submits the proposed 2024 School Impact Fees and Capital Facilities Plans for the districts of Issaquah, Kent, and Renton; and the 2025 Renton Regional Fire Authority Impact and Fire Marshal Fees, and upon approval will incorporate the fees into the 2025 Fee Schedule. Refer to Planning & Development Committee c) AB - 3651 Public Works Airport recommends execution of a three-year agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates for architectural and engineering services, in an amount not to exceed $250,000, to support various development projects at the Renton Municipal Airport. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee d) AB - 3658 Public Works Airport recommends execution of a three-year agreement with DOWL, LLC, for architectural and engineering services, in an amount not to exceed $250,000, to support various development projects at the Renton Municipal Airport. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a) Transportation Committee: 1) Lease Agreement with Rainier Flight Service, LLC; 2) Change Order No. 21 to CAG-22-163 with Pivetta Brother’s Construction, Inc. for the Rainier Ave S Corridor Improvements - Phase 4 Project; 3) Addendum 7-24 to LAG-93-004 with BHC, Inc; 4) Addendum 8-24 to LAG-99-003 with Lane Hangar Condominiums Owners Association; 5) Lease Agreement with Northwest Seaplanes, Inc.; 6) 2025-2030 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program b) Utilities Committee: 1) Agreement with Shannon and Wilson Inc. for the East Valley Road Storm System Improvements Project; 2) Agreement Between the City of Renton and Soos Creek Water and Sewer District*; 3) Agreement with PACE Engineers, Inc. for Design of the Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV) Station 1 & PRV Station 16 Rehabilitation Project; 4) Agreement with Skyway Water and Sewer District for Transfer of Water Service 8. LEGISLATION Resolution: a) Resolution No. 4536: Amended Interlocal Agreement with Skyway Water & Sewer District (See Item 7.b) 9. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; visit rentonwa.gov/cityclerk for more information.) 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION a) To discuss labor negotiations pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(b) for approximately 30 minutes. 11. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) 5:00 p.m. - 7th Floor - Council Chambers/Videoconference Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 To view Council Meetings online, please visit rentonwa.gov/councilmeetings Arm ondo Pavone Mayor MTHEREAS,each year,the United States observes National Hispanic Heritage Month by celebrating the culture,heritage,and contributions of those whose ancestors were indigenous to North America as well as those who came from Spain,Mexico,the Caribbean,Central America,and South America;and MIIEREAS,the population of the City of Renton is comprised of approximately 14.77%Hispanic or Latino residents;and MIHEREAS,in 1968,President Lyndon B.Johnson’s administration initiated observation of Hispanic Heritage Week,and 20 years later it became federal law in 1988,designating the month from September 15 to October 15 to be nationally recognized as Hispanic Heritage Month;and WHEREAS,this year’s Hispanic Heritage Month theme:“Pioneers of Change:Shaping the Future Together”serves as a reminder of the spirit of innovation,resilience and unity that encapsulates the Hispanic experience;and M7HEREAS,we acknowledge the contributions of Hispanic and Latinx leaders and trailblazers with our community through their businesses and achievements,which contribute to Renton’s success, culture,and inspire the community;and MTHEREAS,the City of Renton becomes stronger through recognition and celebration of the traditions,cultures,experiences and backgrounds that form our community; NO’V THEREFORE,I,Armondo Pavone,Mayor of the City of Renton,do hereby proclaim September 15-October 15,2024 to be HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH in the City of Renton,and I encourage all residents to honor the rich diversity of the Hispanic community and celebrate the many ways they contribute to our nation and society. IN ‘WITNESS THEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed this 16th day of September,2024. Ar o Pavone,Mayor City of Renton,Washington PROCLAMATION Renton City Hall,7th Floor 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98057.rentonwa.gov AGENDA ITEM #3. a) Mayor’s Office Memorandum DATE: September 12, 2024 TO: Ed Prince, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Armondo Pavone, Mayor Ed VanValey, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report • Information about preventative street maintenance, traffic impact projects, and road closures happening this week can be found at http://rentonwa.gov/traffic. All projects are weather permitting and unless otherwise noted, streets will always remain open. Preventative street maintenance, traffic impact projects, and road closures will be at the following locations: Monday, September 16 through Friday, September 20, 8:00am-3:00pm. Intermittent lane closure on NE 12th St and Jefferson Ave NE for utility installation. Approved traffic control plans were issued for all work and will be followed. Questions may be directed to Brad Stocco, 425-282-2373. Monday, September 16 through Friday, September 20, 8:00am-3:00pm. Road closure on Kirkland Ave NE between NE Sunset Blvd and NE 12th St for utility installation. Detour route will be provided. Approved traffic control plans were issued for all work and will be followed. Questions may be directed to Brad Stocco, 425-282-2373. Monday, September 16 through Friday, September 20, 8:00am-3:00pm. Intermittent lane closure on NE Sunset Blvd between Edmonds Ave NE and Kirkland Ave NE for construction work. Approved traffic control plans were issued for all work and will be followed. Questions may be directed to Brad Stocco, 425-282- 2373. Monday, September 16 through Friday, September 20, 8:00am-3:00pm. Shifting lane closures both east and west on NE Sunset Blvd between Redmond Pl NE to Union Ave NE for utility installation and frontage improvements. Approved traffic control plans were issued for all work and will be followed. Questions may be directed to Brad Stocco, 425- 282-2373. Monday, September 16 through Friday, September 20, 8:00am-3:00pm. Intermittent lane closure near 601 Monster Rd SW utility installation. Approved traffic control plans were issued for all work and will be followed. Questions may be directed to Rob Blackburn, 206-379-1489. AGENDA ITEM #4. a) Ed Prince, Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 September 12, 2024 Monday, September 16 through Friday, September 20, 8:00am-3:00pm. Road closure on NE 4th St and NE 5th St for utility installation. Approved traffic control plans were issued for all work and will be followed. Questions may be directed to Patrick DeCaro, 425-207- 6013. Monday, September 16 through Friday, September 20, 8:00am-3:00pm. Road closure on Monroe Ave NE south of NE 4th St for utility installation. Approved traffic control plans were issued for all work and will be followed. Questions may be directed to Patrick DeCaro, 425-207-6013. On-going Street Closure (City of Renton Resolution No. 4446). FULL STREET CLOSURE on Sunset Lane NE between NE 10th Street and Harrington Place NE in support the Solera Development Project (LUA20- 000305). Approved traffic control plans were issued for all work and will be followed. Questions may be directed to Brad Stocco, 425-282-2373. Monday, September 16, at 7am through September 23, at 4pm, the right-turn lane of northbound Lind Ave SE turning onto southwest 7th Street will be closed. This closure is necessary for crews to repair ADA ramps, sidewalks, curbs, and gutters. Southwest 7th Street will remain accessible for vehicles making eastbound turns. The extended closure allows the concrete to cure properly without the risk of cracking from truck and trailer traffic. Questions may be directed to Maintenance Shops, 425-430-7400 Thursday, September 19, from 7am-4pm, asphalt repairs will be conducted on Puget Drive South, east of Jones Place Southeast, in the westbound lanes. Questions may be directed to Maintenance Shops, 425- 430-7400 AGENDA ITEM #4. a) September 9, 2024 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES CITY OF RENTON MINUTES - City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, September 9, 2024 Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pavone called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order at 7:00 PM and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present: Ed Prince, Council President James Alberson, Jr., Council Position No. 1 Valerie O'Halloran, Council Position No. 3 Ryan McIrvin, Council Position No. 4 Ruth Pérez, Council Position No. 6 Kim-Khánh Vǎn, Council Position No. 7 Councilmembers Absent: Carmen Rivera, Council Position No. 2 MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY ALBERSON, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBER RIVERA. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PRESENT Armondo Pavone, Mayor Ed VanValey, Chief Administrative Officer Cheryl Beyer, Senior Assistant City Attorney Jason Seth, City Clerk Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Director Laura Pettitt, Communications Director Eric Perry, Government Affairs Manager Commander Sue Hassinger, Police Department Attended Remotely: Judith Subia, Chief of Staff Kim Gilman, Interim Human Resources / Risk Management Administrator Ron Straka, Public Works Utility Systems Director AGENDA ITEM #6. a) September 9, 2024 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT CAO Ed VanValey reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the City’s recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2023 and beyond. Items noted were: • The Renton History Museum is hosting a pilot project for America’s 250th anniversary titled, “Tempests in Teapots” of special interest to educators. Join presenter Barbara McMichael at the Renton History Museum Thursday, September 19 at 4 p.m. for “Tempests in Teapots,” an interactive history presentation with tea tasting that will shed light on how a simple beverage raised tempers enough to brew the Boston Tea Party and American Revolution. This event is free, but pre-registration is required. Go to Eventbrite.com and search for “Tempests in Teapots,” or visit rentonwa.gov/rentonhistorymuseum. • Preventative street maintenance will continue to impact traffic and result in occasional street closures. AUDIENCE COMMENTS • Angela Laulainen, Renton, spoke about the Renton School District's threat of eminent domain to take her and other residents' properties for the expansion of Renton High School. She urged Council to help stop the eminent domain process. • Sarah Becker, also spoke about the Renton School District's threat to use eminent domain to purchase 32 homes and 12 businesses for the Renton High School expansion project. She too urged Council to assist residents in stopping the use of eminent domain for this project. • Catherine Ploue-Smith, Renton, spoke about the Renton School District's threat to use eminent domain for the Renton High School expansion project. She asked Council to assist residents by urging the school district to conduct additional outreach through meetings with neighbors. • Bob Baker, Renton, suggested that Renton use eminent domain to purchase the property where a proposed asphalt plant will be located to protect the city's water supply. He noted that several other cities have used this method in the past and noted that the property is currently valued around $12 million. • Mary Clymer, Renton, stated that she resigned from the Renton Municipal Arts Commissioner (RMAC) due to the poor behavior of another commissioner. She also noted that this person, who is no longer a commissioner, is a registered sex offender. She urged Council to conduct background checks for all future board/commission appointees. • Diane Dobson, Renton, stated that she is speaking on behalf of the Renton Chamber of Commerce and urged Council to do more to protect residents from the criminal activity occurring at the vacant building located on N 6th St. She noted that the building is scheduled to be demolished but until then the City should enforce all code violations. • Heidi Daniel, unknown, introduced herself as the new Executive Director of the King County Library System (KCLS). She spoke about her background and noted that she had visited all 50 libraries operated by KCLS. AGENDA ITEM #6. a) September 9, 2024 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES • Brian Candelori, Seattle, spoke on behalf of the Renton branches of the King County Library System. He noted current and upcoming programs and encouraged everyone to visit both the downtown and Highlands libraries. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of August 12, 2024. Council Concur. b) AB - 3656 Finance Department recommended setting public hearings on October 14 and October 21, 2024, to consider the proposed 2025 Property Tax Levy (revenue sources), the preliminary 2025/2026 Biennium Budget, proposed Fee Schedule adjustments, 2025-2026 Utility Rate and User Fee, and proposed adoption of all related legislation by November 18, 2024. Council Concur; Set Public Hearings on 10/14/2024 and 10/21/2024. c) AB - 3504 Parks & Recreation Department recommended recording the Notice of Grant Award with the King County Recorder's Office to receive the final $50,000 reimbursement from CAG-21-267, which is a grant agreement from the Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund for the Coulon Trestle Bridge project. Refer to Finance Committee. d) AB - 3650 Parks & Recreation Department recommended ratification of a funding agreement with United Way of King County for the acceptance of $8,000 in grant funds for support of the 2024 Summer Meals Program in King County. Refer to Finance Committee. e) AB - 3648 Police Department recommended execution of a Cost Reimbursement Agreement with the King County Sheriff's Office, to receive up to $15,652.15 for reimbursement of overtime costs associated with verifying addresses and residency status of registered sex and kidnapping offenders. Refer to Finance Committee. f) AB - 3653 Public Works Transportation Systems Division recommended setting October 7, 2024, as a Public Hearing date to consider adopting the 2025-2030 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. g) AB - 3649 Public Works Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-21-003, Houser Way Intersection and Pedestrian Improvements project, contractor Westwater Construction Company, and requests acceptance of the project and release of the contract bond after 60 days after all releases from the state have been obtained and any liens have been legally cleared. Council Concur. h) AB - 3654 Public Works Utility Systems Division recommended execution of an agreement with PACE Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $159,480, for the design and services during bidding for the PRV (pressure-reducing valve) Station 1 and 16 Rehabilitation project. Refer to Utilities Committee. i) AB - 3655 Public Works Utility Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement for the transfer of water service for three existing residential water customers from Renton to the Skyway Water and Sewer District, in the amount of $27,467. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY ALBERSON, COUNCIL CONCUR TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PUBLISHED. CARRIED. AGENDA ITEM #6. a) September 9, 2024 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a) Finance Committee: Chair O'Halloran presented a report recommending approval of the following payments: 1. Accounts Payable – total payment of $17,442,202.35 for vouchers 10863-10875, 418350- 418356, 418365-418781, 418786, 418795-419141; payroll benefit withholding vouchers 7473-7494, 418357-418364, 418787-418794 and 2 wire transfers. 2. Payroll – total payment of $4,303,682.98 for payroll vouchers that include 1,620 direct deposits and 47 checks. (7/16/24-7/31/24 and 8/1/24-8/15/24 pay periods). 3. Kidder Mathews vouchers 1712-1732 totaling $19,833.45. 4. Municipal Court vouchers 018579-018592 totaling $20,890.71. MOVED BY O'HALLORAN, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. b) Finance Committee: Chair O'Halloran presented a report recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Washington State Military Department Public Assistance Grant Agreement D24-366. MOVED BY O'HALLORAN, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. c) Finance Committee: Chair O'Halloran presented a report recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Bruce Dees & Associates in the amount of $225,283.00 for master planning and design services for the Cleveland-Richardson Park master plan project. MOVED BY O'HALLORAN, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. d) Finance Committee: Chair O'Halloran presented a report recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the Therapeutic Courts Interagency Agreement IAA25085 between the Renton Municipal Court and the Administrative Office of the Courts, for a reimbursement allocation in the amount of $260,865.60 to support the functions and services of the Renton Municipal Community Court. MOVED BY O'HALLORAN, SECONDED BY PÉREZ, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; visit rentonwa.gov/cityclerk for more information.) MOVED BY VǍN, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF RESEARCH OF WHAT THE CITY CAN DO IN TERMS OF THE RENTON HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATION. * *MOTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF SECOND. AGENDA ITEM #6. a) September 9, 2024 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MOVED BY VǍN, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF RESEARCH TO ACQUIRE THE LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES PROPOSED ASPHALT PLANT SITE TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATION. * *MOTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF SECOND. MOVED BY VǍN, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF BACKGROUND CHECKS AND THOROUGH BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION OF COMMISSION AND BOARD APPOINTMENTS TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATION FOR FUTURE APOINTMENTS. * Mayor Pavone noted that a motion is unnecessary because the Administration is already reviewing this issue. *MOTION WITHDRAWN WITHOUT OBJECTION. MOVED BY VǍN, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF RESEARCH IN TERMS OF WHAT THE CITY CAN DO, WHETHER IT IS AN ORDINANCE, WHETHER IT IS TO PENALIZE PROPERTY OWNERS WHO ARE NOT WITHIN OUR CODE MAINTAINING THEIR PROPERTY, TO THE ADMINISTRATION. *MOTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF SECOND. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY ALBERSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. TIME: 7:43 PM Jason A. Seth, MMC, City Clerk Jason Seth, Recorder 09 Sep 2024 AGENDA ITEM #6. a) Council Committee Meeting Calendar September 9, 2024 September 16, 2024 Monday 2:00 p.m. Utilities Committee, Chair Văn Location: Council Conference Room/Videoconference 1. Agreement with Shannon and Wilson Inc. for the East Valley Road Storm System Improvements Project 2. Agreement Between the City of Renton and Soos Creek Water and Sewer District 3. Agreement with PACE Engineers, Inc. for Design of the Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV) Station 1 & PRV Station 16 Rehabilitation Project 4. Agreement with Skyway Water and Sewer District for Transfer of Water Service 2:45 p.m. Transportation Committee, Chair McIrvin Location: Council Conference Room/Videoconference 1. Lease Agreement with Rainier Flight Service, LLC 2. Change Order No. 21 to CAG-22-163 with Pivetta Brother’s Construction, Inc. for the Rainier Ave S Corridor Improvements - Phase 4 Project 3. Addendum 7-24 to LAG-93-004 with BHC, Inc 4. Addendum 8-24 to LAG-99-003 with Lane Hangar Condominiums Owners Association 5. Lease Agreement with Northwest Seaplanes, Inc. 6. 2025-2030 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program 3:45 p.m. Public Safety Committee, Chair Rivera Location: Council Conference Room/Videoconference 1. Briefing from King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, Juvenile Division 2. RRFA Briefing 3. Emerging Issues in Public Safety 5:00 p.m. Committee of the Whole, Chair Prince Location: Council Chambers/Videoconference 1. Legislative Update 6:00 p.m. Hispanic Heritage Month Reception Location: Conferencing Center No official Council action will be taken during this Reception. 7:00 p.m. Council Meeting Location: Council Chambers/Videoconference AGENDA ITEM #6. a) AB - 3662 City Council Regular Meeting - 16 Sep 2024 SUBJECT/TITLE: 2024 School District Capital Facilities Plans, 2025 Renton Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan, and Approval of Respective Impact Fees and Fire Marshal Fees RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Planning & Development Committee DEPARTMENT: Community & Economic Development Department STAFF CONTACT: Katie Buchl-Morales, Senior Planner EXT.: 6578 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: School impact fees are collected by the City and remitted to the appropriate school district on a quarterly basis. The City will collect a 5% administrative fee for all school impact fees to account for staff time dedicated to collecting, processing, and handling the impact fees. Fire impact fees and Fire Marshal fees are collected by the City and remitted to the Renton Regional Fire Authority as outlined in the interlocal agreement between the City and the Renton Regional Fire Authority. The City will collect a 5% administrative fee for all fire impact fees to account for staff time dedicated to collecting, processing, and handling the impact fees. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Washington’s Growth Management Act authorizes the collection of impact fees to help ensure that those responsible for growth pay a fair share for the cost of new facilities needed to support new growth. School impact fees are assessed on newly built household units and can only be used to support the capital costs of expanded existing or building new school facilities. The Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts have each adopted their updated Capital Facilities Plans and requested the City of Renton collect revised impact fees for 2024, which are based on the need to complete projects that increase the capacity of school facilities to accommodate student body growth. See attached Issue Paper for the requested fees along with the previously applied impact fees. EXHIBITS: A. Issue Paper B. ISD CFP 2024 C. KSD CFP 2024 D. RSD CFP 2024 E. RRFA Letter to COR STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the school districts and Regional Fire Authority’s requested fees. Upon receiving concurrence from council on the amount of fees to approve, staff will include adoption of the fees AGENDA ITEM #6. b) and underlying capital facilities plans within future proposed legislation approving the 2025 Renton Fee Schedule. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 16, 2024 TO: Ed Prince, Council President Members of Renton City Council VIA: Armondo Pavone, Mayor FROM: Gina Estep, Community and Economic Development Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Katie Buchl-Morales, Senior Planner SUBJECT: 2024 School District Capital Facilities Plans, 2025 Renton Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan, and Approval of Respective Impact Fees and Fire Marshal Fees ISSUE(S): 1. Should the City of Renton approve the requested 2024 School Impact Fees for the Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School Districts? 2. Should the City of Renton extend the existing 2025 Renton Regional Fire Authority Impact Fees and Fire Marshal Fees, as requested by Renton Regional Fire Authority? RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the 2024 School Impact Fees for the Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School Districts and recommends approval of the 2025 Renton Regional Fire Authority Impact Fees and Fire Marshal Fees. Staff recommends that the fees be incorporated into the City of Renton Fee Schedule. BACKGROUND: Washington’s Growth Management Act authorizes the collection of impact fees to help ensure that those responsible for growth pay a fair share for the cost of new facilities needed to support new growth. School impact fees are assessed on newly built household units and can only be used to support the capital costs of expanded existing or building new school facilities. The Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts have each adopted their updated Capital Facilities Plans and requested the City of Renton collect revised impact fees for 2024, which are based on the need to complete projects that increase the capacity of school facilities to accommodate student body growth. The requested fees are shown below along with the previously applied impact fees. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Ed Prince, Council President Page 2 of 6 September 16, 2024 Renton School District and Issaquah School District reduced fees for single-family and multi-family development and for the third consecutive year Kent School District will not charge impact fees for single-family nor multi-family development. School Impact Fees, 2020 - 2024 The Renton Regional Fire Authority has updated its Capital Facilities Plan, Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees, and its 2025 Fire Impact Fee Rate Schedule and revised Fire Marshal Fee Schedule and requests that the City of Renton collect revised impact fees and remit impact fees to the Renton Regional Fire Authority. Impact fee rates for new development are based on, and vary according to, the type of land use. The fees are based on the need to achieve and maintain adopted standards for levels of service concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of expected development and population growth and is consistent with the land use and transportation elements of the City of Renton and King County comprehensive plans. The lack of significant changes in the Renton Regional Fire Authority’s operating environment allows the organization to maintain the current fee schedule without adjustments. Renton 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Change Single- Family $7,681 $2,659 $2,911 $2,161 $1,003 $(1,158) Multi- Family $4,989 $4,737 $3,697 $4,257 $3,268 $(989) Kent 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Change Single- Family $5,692.85 $5,818.09 -- -- -- -- Multi- Family $2,404.63 $2,457.53 -- -- -- -- Issaquah 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Change Single- Family $18,213 $20,291 $11,377 $15,510 $4,728 $(10,782) Multi- Family $12,043 $8,353 $4,718 $3,514 -- $(3,514) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Ed Prince, Council President Page 3 of 6 September 16, 2024 Fire Impact Fees Land Use Unit 2024 2025 Change Residential – single family (detached dwelling & duplexes) Dwelling Unit (d.u.) $421.98 $421.98 N/C Residential – multi-family & accessory dwelling unit (ADU) Dwelling Unit (d.u.) $579.41 $579.41 N/C Hotel/Motel/Resort* Room $346.22 $346.22 N/C Medical Care Facility** Bed $1,052.00 $1,052.00 N/C Office Square Foot $0.14 $0.14 N/C Medical/Dental Office Square Foot $0.61 $0.61 N/C Retail Square Foot $0.66 $0.66 N/C Leisure Facilities Square Foot $0.42 $0.42 N/C Restaurant/Lounge Square Foot $1.44 $1.44 N/C Industrial/Manufacturing Square Foot $0.05 $0.05 N/C Church/Non-Profit Square Foot $0.24 $0.24 N/C Education*** Per student $28.02 $28.02 N/C Special Public Facilities Square Foot $0.13 $0.13 N/C *Changed from sq. ft. to room in 2023, new rate and unit will go into effect in 2024 **Changed from sq. ft. to bed in 2023, new rate and unit will go into effect in 2024 ***Changed from sq. ft. to student in 2023, new rate and unit will go into effect in 2024 Fire Marshal Plans Review & Inspection Fees a. Fire Plans Review & Inspection Fees 2024 2025 Change (I) $0 - $249.99 $50 $50 N/C (II) $250.00 - $999.99 $50 + 2% of the cost $50 + 2% of the cost N/C (III) $1,000 - $4,999.99 $75 + 2% of the cost $75 + 2% of the cost N/C (IV) $5,000 - $49,999.99 $200 + 1.5% of the cost $200 + 1.5% of the cost N/C (V) $50,000 - $99,999.99 $450 + 1.2% of the cost $450 + 1.2% of the cost N/C (VI) $100,000 and above $950 + .75% of the cost $950 + .75% of the cost N/C (VII) Construction Re-Inspection. Fee is per hour with a 2 hour minimum. The minimum may be assessed if the required inspection does not meet the approval of the inspector. $175 $175 N/C (VIII) Violation/Second Re-Inspection after 30-day period (whenever 30 $150 $150 N/C AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Ed Prince, Council President Page 4 of 6 September 16, 2024 days or more have passed since fire department notification of a violation, which required a first re-inspection, and such violation has not been remedied or granted an extension. (IX) Third and subsequent re- inspection/pre-citation follow-up inspection when re-inspections are required beyond the first and second re-inspections. $250 $250 N/C (X) Preventable fire alarm fee: 1. First, second, and third preventable alarms 2. Fourth and fifth preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm 3. Sixth preventable alarm and successive preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm No Charge $75 $150 No Charge $75 $150 N/C (XI) Late payment penalty $35 $35 N/C b. Fire Permit Type 2024 2025 Change (I) Operational fire code permit (issued in accordance with Section 105.6 of the IFC) fee is yearly (including items such as fire special events, covered stages, mobile food facilities, hot works, etc.) $150 $150 N/C (II) Permits for mobile food facilities that have passed a fire and life safety inspection in another jurisdiction that has reciprocity with Renton RFA $75 $75 N/C (III) Hazardous materials and HPM facilities yearly $250 $250 N/C (IV) Construction permit 20% of plan review fee; minimum $75 20% of plan review fee; minimum $75 N/C (V) Hazardous production materials permit (for businesses storing, handling, or using hazardous production materials as regulated in the fire code) permit is yearly $250 $250 N/C AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Ed Prince, Council President Page 5 of 6 September 16, 2024 Fiscal Note(s) School impact fees are collected by the City and remitted to the appropriate school district on a quarterly basis. The City will collect a 5% administrative fee for all school impact fees to account for staff time dedicated to collecting, processing, and handling the impact fees. Fire impact fees and Fire Marshal fees are collected by the City and remitted to the Renton Regional Fire Authority as outlined in the interlocal agreement between the City and the Renton Regional Fire Authority. The City will collect a 5% administrative fee for all fire impact fees to account for staff time dedicated to collecting, processing, and handling the impact fees. (VI) Underground tank removal permit (commercial) See fire plan review and construction permit fees See fire plan review and construction permit fees N/C (VII) Underground tank removal or abandonment-in-place permit (residential) $200 $200 N/C (VIII) Other requested inspection when not required by the fire code, or when requested for afterhours inspections. Fee is per hour with a minimum 2 hour when approved by the Fire Marshal, such as home daycares. $175 $175 Minimu m hours amende d; 1 to 2 hours (IX) Non-emergency Billable Services (i.e., boat assists, etc.) Rates published at: www.washingtonfirechiefs.com WFC Current Wage and Equipment Rate WFC Current Wage and Equipment Rate N/C (X) NSF check fees $25 $25 N/C (XI) RFA technology surcharge fee applied to Fire Department Fire Marshal Fees, subsection a. (I, II, III, IV, V, VI) 5% 5% N/C AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Ed Prince, Council President Page 6 of 6 September 16, 2024 Staff Recommendation(s) 1. Approve the requested School Impact Fees for the Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts and incorporate them into the fee schedule, to take effect January 1, 2025. 2. Extend the existing applicable Fire Impact Fees and Fire Marshal Plans Review and Inspection Fees and incorporate them into the fee schedule, to take effect January 1, 2025. Cc: Ed VanValey, Chief Administrative Officer Kari Roller, Finance Administrator Gina Estep, CED Administrator AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 1 of 26 Issaquah School District No. 411 Issaquah, Washington Adopted: June 13, 2024 Resolution No: 1221 KC STRC - Rev. 3 The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 2 of 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 3 STANDARD OF SERVICE ............................................................................................................... 4 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................................... 5 DEVELOPMENT TRACKING AND STUDENT GENERATION RATES .......................................... 5 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS ................................. 6 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (continued) .............. 7 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 8 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ................................ 9 TABLE 2: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY ...................................... 10 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES ..................................................... 11 SITE LOCATION MAP ................................................................................................................... 12 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP ........................................................................................... 13 ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN ..................................... 14 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ............................ 15 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS ....................................... 16 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ............................................ 17 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ..................................................................................... 18 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ...................................... 19 APPENDIX A: 2024-25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES ................................................. 20 APPENDIX B: 2024-25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES ............................................................ 21 APPENDIX C: 2024-25 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES ................................................................ 22 APPENDIX D: 2024-25 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES .............................................................. 23 APPENDIX E: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN ....................................................................................... 24 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATE MEMO ......................................................... 25-26 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 3 of 26 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the “District”) as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and King County Council Code Title 21A. This Plan was prepared using data available in April 2024. This Plan is an update of prior long-term Capital Facilities Plans adopted by the Issaquah School District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole Plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with board policies, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six- Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first submitted a request to King County to impose and to collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated King County. On November 16, 1992, the King County Council first adopted the District's Plan and a fee implementing ordinance. This Plan is the annual update of the Six-Year Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle and Sammamish collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Most of these jurisdictions provide exemptions from impact fees for senior housing and certain low-income housing. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any charges in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 4 of 26 STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re-locatable classroom facilities (portables). Different class sizes are used depending on the grade level or programs offered such as special education or the gifted program. With the passage of Initiative 728 in November 2000, the Issaquah School Board established new class size standards for elementary grades K-5. The Board and District Administration will continue to keep class sizes near the levels provided by I-728; this will be done via local levy funds. The District has provided Full-Day Kindergarten since the 2016-2017 school year. A class size average of 20 for grades K-5 is used to calculate building capacities. A class size of 26 is used for grades 6-8 and 28 for grades 9-12. Special Education class size is based on 12 students per class. For the purpose of this analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with the provisions of King County Council Code Title 21A, are not considered classrooms. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Portables used as classrooms accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school as an interim classroom or removed. The District currently has one undeveloped site, planned for a new high school and future elementary school. The State does not provide funding for property purchases. The District’s voters approved the 2016 Bond to provide funding for a new high school, new middle school, two new elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. All of those projects are now complete with the exception of the new high school and one new elementary school. The new high school is discussed further in this Capital Facilities Plan and will require additional funding sources. The new elementary school is on indefinite hold until capacity at the elementary level is needed. Additional funding for the new high school is anticipated to be pursued during the six-year planning period. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 5 of 26 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high school to meet capacity needs at the high school level related to recent and ongoing enrollment growth needs. The District recently completed construction of a new elementary school, Cedar Trails Elementary School, a new middle school, Cougar Mountain Middle School, as well as additions at several elementary schools, all to help address recent growth needs. The need for new schools and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, t he availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bond issues determine when any new facility can be constructed. New school facilities are a response, in part, to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. DEVELOPMENT TRACKING AND STUDENT GENERATION RATES In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi-family residence. It also provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the n umber of students who will attend our schools from future developments. The District used a third-party consultant to review recent development data and provide updated student generation rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family residence and new multi-family housing. Updated rates are shown in Table 2. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 6 of 26 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS The District relies on school impact fee revenue to help fund growth-related capacity needs. However, by law, impact fees can only be used to fund a portion of a capacity project. State funding and impact fees are also not reliable sources of revenue. As a result, the District must also rely on local funding to fund school construction. The District has one growth-related capacity project included in this Capital Facilities Plan which is a new high school. The voters funded the project as a part of the April 2016 bond and the April 2022 capital levy. The District utilized funds from the 2016 Bond to purchase property for the new high school and to engage in design and permitting work. Additional funding, aside from impact fee revenue and State School Construction Assistance Program dollars, is needed to construct the new high school. As demonstrated in Appendix A the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 8,763 students at the elementary level. This leaves the District’s elementary enrollment under permanent capacity by 781 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). As demonstrated in Appendix B the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,946 students at the middle school level. This leaves the District’s middle school enrollment under permanent capacity by 442 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). As demonstrated in Appendix C the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,921 students at the high school level. This leaves the District’s high school enrollment over permanent capacity by 815 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). Based on the District’s student generation rates (Table 2), the District expects that 0.641 students will be generated from each new single family home and 0.159 students will be generated from each new multi-family dwelling unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained on page 9 to the District’s existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2029-30, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be under its permanent capacity by 760 students, under permanent capacity at the middle school level by 483 students, and over permanent capacity by 673 students at the high school level. Importantly, the above figures incorporate recently completed growth-projects at the elementary and middle school levels. The District’s enrollment projections are developed using two methods: first, the cohort survival – historical enrollment method is used to forecast enrollment growth based upon the progression of existing students in the District; then, the enrollment projections are modified to include students anticipated from new developments in the District. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 7 of 26 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (continued) To address existing and future capacity needs, the District’s six-year construction plan includes the following capacity projects: Facility Expansions Projected / Final Completion Date Location Additional Capacity New High School August 2027 Issaquah 1600 The District recently opened the new Cougar Mountain Middle School, with permanent capacity of 828, and the new Cedar Trails Elementary School, with permanent capacity of 496 students. Both schools were funded by the April 2016 bond and provide capacity to serve new growth. Based upon the District’s capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data, the District has determined that the planned new high school is needed, in part, to provide capacity improvements necessary to serve students generated by recent and ongoing new residential development. The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi-family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by credits for the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted as required by local ordinances. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve each new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. The impact fees will be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050-110 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District’s recent and ongoing student growth, coupled with the need for the timely funding and construction of new facilities to serve this growth, requires strict adherence to this position. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 8 of 26 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Two basic techniques are used, with the results compared, to establish the most likely range of anticipated student enrollment: 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. The cohort method is also hampered by the fact that it does account for anomalies affecting enrollment (for example, the Covid-19 pandemic, temporary remote learning and the variations in the transition back to in-person learning). 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., the District seeks to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year and converts those units to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. (The student generation factors are shown in Table 2) b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After determining the expected new students, the current actual student enrollments are moved forward from year to year with the arrived at additions. One of the challenges associated with all projection techniques is that, where new development is in the pipeline, they tend to always show growth because the number of houses and the general population always increases. Enrollments, however, can and do decrease even as the population increases. The reason is as the population matures, the number of kindergartners will go down as the number of 10th graders is still increasing. To adjust for this factor, the number of school age children per dwelling is examined. When this number exceeds expectations, it is probably because the District is still assuming kindergarten growth, while the main growth is actually moving into middle school. When this happens, a reduction factor is added to kindergarten to force it to decrease even though the general population continues to grow. A precise statistical formula has not been developed to make this adjustment. After all of the projections have been made and examined, the most likely range is selected. An examination of past projections compared with actual enrollment indicates the cohorts tend to be more accurate over a ten-year time span while dwelling units tend to be more accurate over a shorter period. The probable reason is that over a ten-year period, the projections tend to average out even though there are major shifts both up and down within the period. The Covid-19 pandemic has complicated projections in recent years. The District has experienced a return to in-person learning in the last three years but continues to monitor student enrollment closely. As with last year’s projections, this year’s projections are more conservative than in previous years to allow the District to gather additional data and experience. Like other districts, the District is also experiencing fewer students at the high school level enrolling in Running Start options and instead choosing to be fully enrolled in the District 9-12 program. Enrollment projections for the years 2024-2025 through 2038-2039 are shown in Table 1 (page 9). These projections are conservative in the near-term (within a 5 year period). The District assumes an eventual increase in enrollment will occur, but does not believe our historical peak enrollment will be reached within the next 7 years. The District however, could have a large uptick in enrollment depending upon land use decisions, housing and labor market, etc. The District will monitor these matters and include updated information in future updates to the Capital Facilities Plan. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 9 of 26 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS: 2014-15 THRU 2023-24 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS: 2024-25 THRU 2038-39 *2016-17 Enrollment reflects the addition of State Funded Full Day Kindergarten AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 10 of 26 TABLE 2: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 11 of 26 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 18,630 students in permanent facilities and 4,688 students in portables. While portables are critical for interim capacity needs, they are not desirable nor long-term capacity solutions. The District looks to its permanent capacity, as adjusted for utilization, for purposes of determining growth-related needs and addressing school capacity. The projected student enrollment for the 2024-2025 school year is expected to be 18,221 which leaves a permanent capacity surplus of 409. Enrollment projections indicate permanent capacity needs at the high school level over the six-year planning period. Calculations of elementary, middle school and high school capacities are shown in Appendices A, B and C. Totals are shown in Appendix D. Below is a list of current facilities. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 117th Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. S.E., Sammamish Cedar Trails Elementary 4399 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd S.E. , Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 167th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 S.E. Issaquah-Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 136th Ave S.E., Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32nd Street, Issaquah Cougar Mountain Middle School 1929 NW Talus Dr, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 600 2nd Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah-Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3095 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd., Sammamish GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Gibson Ek High School 379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 5150 220th Ave S.E., Issaquah Holly Street Early Learning Center 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center - Main 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Center - Satellite 3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 12 of 26 SITE LOCATION MAP AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 13 of 26 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 14 of 26 THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. Shown in Table 3 is the District's projected capacity to house students, which reflects the additional facilities as noted. Voters passed a $533 million bond in April 2016 to fund the purchase of land for and construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. The voters also funded an April 2022 capital levy to provide an additional funding for the high school project as well as other projects. On May 23, 2024 the ISD Board of Directors reallocated, via resolution, $44,000,000 in funds from the 2022 capital levy that were designated for the new high school to other more immediate capital needs. The District does anticipate receiving State matching funds for the new high school project that would reduce future bond sale amounts or be applied to new K-12 construction projects included in this Plan. The District will need additional funding to construct the new high school. The District anticipates seeking additional funding within six years, with the Bond Advisory Committee working now on recommendations to the Board of Directors for a future bond proposal. Secured funding will be identified in future updates to this CFP. The District also anticipates that it will receive $500,000 in impact fees and mitigation payments that will be applied to capital projects. Per the formula in the adopted school impact fee ordinance, half of the unfunded growth-related need is assigned to impact fees and half is the local share. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 15 of 26 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 16 of 26 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 17 of 26 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 18 of 26 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 19 of 26 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION COST: • The District previously purchased a site for the new high school. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST: • High School $228,000,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional high school capacity PERCENTAGE OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: Total Square Footage 2,904,166 Permanent Square Footage *2,700,666 Temporary Square Footage *203,500 * Source - Capital Projects Facility Construction Data 2022-23 spreadsheet STATE MATCH CREDIT: Current Area Cost Allowance $375.00 Percentage of State Match 36.72% AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 20 of 26 APPENDIX A: 2023-24 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) Page 21 of 26 APPENDIX B: 2023-24 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) Page 22 of 26 APPENDIX C: 2023-24 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) Page 23 of 26 APPENDIX D: 2023-24 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) Page 24 of 26 APPENDIX E: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) Page 25 of 26 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page 26 of 26 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO (cont) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2023-2024 through 2029-2030 June 2024 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7526 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Meghin Margel, President Mr. Awale Farah, Vice President Mr. Tim Clark, Legislative Representative Mr. Donald Cook, Director Mr. Andy Song, Director ADMINISTRATION Israel Vela Superintendent of Schools Dr. Wade Barringer, Deputy Superintendent Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations Sara Dumlao, Assistant Director of Business Services AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection ............................................................................. 4 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" ................................................. 7 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ........................................ 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ............................................................ 9 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan .............................................................. 14 VI - Portable Classrooms ........................................................................................... 21 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ............................................................... 25 VIII - Finance Plan ..................................................................................................... 30 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2024 Capital Facilities Plan ..................................... 34 X - Appendices .......................................................................................................... 35 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2024 for the 2023-2024 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Functional capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the interim capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. 1 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional interim capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI (See Table 1). The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District’s 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the District’s capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link). Based on revised student generation rates, our capacity and enrollment projections, the District will stay current with non-collection of student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2024 Capital Facilities Plan). 2 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY LB = Live Births LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 2018 October HC Enrollment 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 King County Live Births 1 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 25,274 24,337 Incr/(Decr)116 402 (122)438 139 524 (737)(937) Kindergarten / Birth % 1 8.17%8.14%7.98%7.93%6.68%7.06%7.41%7.24% Kindergarten 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 1,836 1,874 1,761 Grade 1 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 1,768 1,945 1,931 Grade 2 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 1,818 1,840 1,966 Grade 3 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 1,938 1,887 1,878 Grade 4 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 1,924 1,953 1,924 Grade 5 2,103 2,189 2,170 2,120 1,937 1,872 1,953 1,973 Grade 6 Middle 1,952 2,119 2,184 2,164 2,024 1,893 1,962 1,948 Grade 7 " "2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 1,925 1,906 1,949 Grade 8 " "2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 1,937 1,956 1,922 Grade 9 High 2,105 2,006 2,003 1,888 2,001 2,042 2,010 1,958 Grade 10 " "2,099 2,080 1,946 2,034 1,811 1,959 2,048 2,001 Grade 11 " "1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,743 1,584 1,679 1,729 Grade 12 " "1,730 1,810 1,653 1,634 1,453 1,655 1,467 1,502 Total Enrollment 2 26,529 26,523 25,833 25,912 24,543 24,151 24,480 24,442 Yearly Headcount Incr/(Decr)17 (6)(690)79 (1,369)(392)329 (38) Cumulative Incr/(Decr)(302)(308)(998)(919)(2,288)(2,680)(1,959)(2,718) 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. 2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE" & "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education) and excludes College-only Running Start students. For 2024 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2024 3 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the District relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick’s study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the winter of 2022. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 2). 7.24% of 24,337 King County live births in 2018 is projected for 1,761 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2023. This is a decrease of 937 live births in King County over the previous year. Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2024 going forward rely upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the “low growth” methodology. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. 4 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .229 Middle .087 High .113 Total .429 Multi-Family Elementary .109 Middle .037 High .054 Total .200 The student generation factor is based on 2,062 new SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2017 and 2022. The student generation factor is based on 1,709 new MF (Multi- Family) units built during the same period. The multi-family units consisted of 1,379 apartment units and 330 townhome units. The District sees an average of 43 students for every 100 single family units that are built and an average of 20 students for every 100 multi-family units that are built. The rate for apartment units is higher than for townhome units. The District sees an average of 23 students for every 100 apartment units and only 6 students for every 100 townhome units. The student generation rate also varies among apartment developments, based on the number of bedrooms in the unit. Units with three plus bedrooms have much higher student generation rates than units that have two or fewer bedrooms. Noting these differences can help the District when planning for future growth from housing. In preparing the 2023-2024 to 2029-2030 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Educational Data Solutions, LLC led by Dr. Les Kendrick, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. Within the District’s borders there are several income-based and multi-family housing projects coming on-line in 2023/2024. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. At the start of the 2023-24 school year, 2 apartment complexes; Alexan Gateway and Station by Vintage have been excluded from the available multi-family units because the units have not been completed and/or have not been released to be rented. 5 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX - YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2018 LB in 2019 LB in 2020 LB in 2021 LB in 2022 LB in 2023 Est. LB in 2024 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT October 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 King County Live Births 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,390 23,012 23,973 24,428 Incr/(Decr)(937)(247)(404)(296)(378)961 455 Kindergarten / Birth % 7.24%7.53%7.60%7.61%7.94%7.75%7.60% FD Kindergarten 1,761 1,814 1,801 1,781 1,827 1,857 1,857 Grade 1 1,931 1,893 1,902 1,888 1,849 1,897 1,918 Grade 2 1,966 1,961 1,946 1,955 1,931 1,891 1,930 Grade 3 1,878 2,004 2,017 2,002 2,011 1,986 1,936 Grade 4 1,924 1,861 2,013 2,026 2,010 2,019 1,985 Grade 5 1,973 1,887 1,893 2,047 2,060 2,044 2,043 Grade 6 Middle 1,948 2,009 1,950 1,955 2,114 2,128 2,101 Grade 7 " "1,949 1,973 2,005 1,946 1,952 2,111 2,114 Grade 8 " "1,922 1,937 1,991 2,024 1,965 1,970 2,120 Grade 9 High 1,958 1,939 1,993 2,049 2,083 2,022 2,018 Grade 10 " "2,001 1,990 1,958 2,012 2,069 2,103 2,031 Grade 11 " "1,729 1,754 1,755 1,726 1,774 1,824 1,845 Grade 12 " "1,502 1,695 1,678 1,680 1,652 1,698 1,737 Total Enrollment Projection 24,442 24,717 24,902 25,091 25,297 25,550 25,635 Yearly Incr/(Decr)(38)275 185 189 206 253 85 Yearly Incr/(Decr) %-0.16%1.13%0.75%0.76%0.82%1.00%0.33% Total Enrollment Projection*24,442 24,717 24,902 25,091 25,297 25,550 25,635 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study Dec '22 ("Preferred Forecast") *Does not include iGrad, RS 2023 - 2029 Enrollment Projections PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2024 6 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students •Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. •Class size ratio for grades 4 - 5 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided with music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Career and Technical Education (CTE) – State Program Closing Educational Achievement Gaps (Title I – Part A) - Federal Program Highly Capable Students (HiCap) - State Program 7 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Learning Assistance Program (LAP) – State Program Multilingual Education (MLE) - State Program Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 students, depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. •The average class size ratio for grades 6–8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. •The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 66% for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 56% utilization at the elementary level. 8 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent functional capacity to house 35,494 students and interim (portable) capacity to house 4,238. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 89% - 11%. The functional capacity is periodically updated for changes in the programs, additional classrooms, and new schools. Functional capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the fall of 2023. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or “iGrad”. iGrad is an Open Door (Drop-out Reengagement) School that offers a second plus chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school or are at risk of not earning a high school diploma by age 21. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan, because it is served as a leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 434 students. Kent Virtual Academy - The Kent Virtual Academy is open to grades 6-12 and is currently serving 108 students. The virtual school offers a flexible learning experience designed to engage students when and where they work best. Each school day includes a combination of live (synchronous) virtual instruction and on-demand (asynchronous) learning opportunities outside of a traditional bell schedule. Students can attend live virtual lessons with their teachers and classmates, participate in live virtual class or small group discussions, check-in or meet with teachers, watch recorded video lessons, work independently on projects and lessons, participate in learning experiences outside the school setting for credit or to meet competencies. Virtual school students may also attend their boundary school for select classes and services. 9 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Year Opened Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 626 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 568 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 744 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 629 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 779 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 653 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 528 East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Fairwood Elementary George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 640 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 591 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 595 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 634 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 641 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 760 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 725 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 768 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 706 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 793 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 688 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 864 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 744 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 701 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 732 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 661 2021 RR 22420 Military Rd. S., SeaTac, WA 98198 886 Park Orchard Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Ridgewood Elementary River Ridge Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 549 1960 SH 837 1971 SC 591 1969 SB 730 1992 SR 719 20,082 1966 CR 1,110 1993 CH 1,140 1981 MA 1,020 1970 MK 1,224 1958 MM 1,110 2005 MC 1,200 Scenic Hill Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sunrise Elementary Elementary TOTAL 1996 NW 1,140 7,950 1951 KM 2,595 1997 KL 2,714 1968 KR 2,932 1981 KW 2,917 11,158 2021 KLA 542 Canyon Ridge Middle Cedar Heights Middle Mattson Middle Meeker Middle Meridian Middle Mill Creek Middle Northwood Middle Middle TOTAL Kent-Meridian High Kentlake High Kentridge High Kentwood High High TOTAL Kent Laboratory Academy DISTRICT TOTAL 39,732 2023-2024 Functional SCHOOL ABR ADDRESS 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 19640 SE 272nd Street, Covington 98042 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 105 SE 208th St., Kent, WA 98031 Table 3 10 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Kent-Meridian High School Kentlake High School Kentridge High School Kentwood High School King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Kent School District 2023/24 School Year High School Boundaries Legend High School Buildings Kent-Meridian High School Kentlake High School Kentridge High School Kentwood High School ± 0 4 82 Miles 11 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Cedar Heights Mattson Meeker MeridianMill Creek Northwood Canyon Ridge King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Middle Schools Cedar Heights Middle School Canyon Ridge Middle School Mattson Middle School Meeker Middle School Meridian Middle School Mill Creek Middle School Northwood Middle School Kent School District 2023/2024 School Year Middle School Boundaries 0 3.75 7.51.88 Miles Ü 12 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Carriage Crest Cedar ValleyCovington Crestwood East Hill Emerald Park Fairwood George T. Daniel Glenridge Grass Lake Horizon Jenkins Creek Kent Lake Youngs Martin Sortun Meadow Ridge Meridian Millennium Neely O Brien Panther Lake Park Orchard Pine Tree Ridgewood Sawyer Woods Scenic Hill Soos Creek Springbrook Sunrise River Ridge King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Carriage Crest Elementary Cedar Valley Elementary Covington Elementary Crestwood Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Fairwood Elementary Glenridge Elementary Grass Lake Elementary Horizon Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Kent Elementary Lake Youngs Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Meadow Ridge Elementary Meridian Elementary Millennium Elementary Neely O Brien Elementary Panther Lake Elementary Park Orchard Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Ridgewood Elementary River Ridge Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary Scenic Hill Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sunrise Elementary Elementary Schools Kent School District 2023/2024 School Year Elementary Boundaries 0 3.75 7.51.88 Miles Ü 13 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This bonding authority provided for the replacement of Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, the new River Ridge Elementary school, and our new Kent Laboratory Academy, which both opened in August 2021. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from schools and bus stops, as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Sitemap). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for future schools and district use; the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for the purchase of additional sites but may also be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Our District went out for a Bond Measure in April of 2023 and did not receive enough votes for approval. We reevaluated the District needs and looked at next steps to align with the Strategic Plan which continues to make it a priority to revitalize, rejuvenate and rebuild our aging schools as well as begin a process to remove interim classroom portables and find room or create permanent structures to reduce and eventually eliminate the more than 166 portable classrooms in our District. We will continue to determine capacity versus enrollment as well as programs to ensure this goal to reduce and or eliminate all portables in our District is obtained in the next several years. As a part of the planning process, the District has been tracking a few major development projects which have affected enrollment and will continue to increase students' forecasts. On Meeker Street in Kent, we have seen several major apartment complexes, ETHOS and Midtown 64 Apartments. These continue to have an impact on enrollment as they fill up their newly built facilities. The Alexian Gateway Project is located on the corner of Military Road and Veterans Drive in Kent and has begun occupying its 283 units in 2023-2024. In Covington, we are tracking a multi-family house development which has been approved and construction has begun. The 1700-unit Lakepointe Urban Community will fall within our 14 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) enrollment boundary and proposed completion of Phase 4 is shown to be 2027. Construction in the Kent School District boundaries have been steadily rising over the last four years and planned communities are now being recognized through the planning teams in multiple city and county jurisdictions we serve. 15 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate # on Map ELEMENTARY MIDDLE & HIGH TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity # on Map 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Designation Type 12 256th - Covington (Halleson)25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042 Rural Sold 12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom)25847 156th Ave. SE, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold 16 White House - Kent (Top)11027 SE Kent-Kangley Kent, WA 98030 Commercial Purchased 16a Green Building - Kent (iGrad)11109 SE Kent-Kangley Kent, WA 98030 Commercial Purchased Notes: None King County King County Land Use Jurisdiction King County King County Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 16 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) © copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. This map has been modified by KSD 05/22 Sawyer Woods Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Fairwood Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary Glenridge Elementary Kentridge High School Springbrook Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Sunrise Elementary Meridian Middle School Kentwood High School Park Orchard Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Mill Creek Middle School Kent Elementary Kent-Meridian High School Scenic Hill Elementary Kent School District Administration Center Meadow Ridge Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Horizon Elementary Covington Elementary Cedar Heights Middle School Cedar Valley Elementary Crestwood Elementary Mattson Middle School Kentlake High School Neely O’Brien Elementary Carriage Crest Elementary MeridianElementary Meeker Middle School Grass Lake Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Millennium Elementary iGrad Kent Valley Early Learning Center The Outreach Program (TOP) Panther Lake Elementary River Ridge Elementary Kent Laboratory Academy 17 AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) cccc cc ccc cc c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c V E T E R A N S D R I V E O L D M I L I T A R Y R O A D S O U T H AMENITY SPACE TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES TRASH ENCLOSURES 2 1 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 4 0 1 2 1 0 4 2 2 0 4 2 3 0 4 2 4 0 4 2 1 0 5 2 2 0 5 2 3 0 5 2 4 0 5 2 1 0 8 2 2 0 8 2 3 0 8 2 4 0 8 2 1 0 9 2 2 0 9 2 3 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 4 1 3 2 1 1 6 2 2 1 6 2 3 1 6 2 4 1 6 2 1 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 3 0 2 2 4 0 2 2 1 0 3 2 2 0 3 2 3 0 3 2 4 0 3 ------ 2 2 0 6 2 3 0 6 2 4 0 6 ------ 2 2 0 7 2 3 0 7 2 4 0 7 ------ 2 2 1 0 2 3 1 0 2 4 1 0 ------ 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 4 1 1 ------ 2 2 1 4 2 3 1 4 2 4 1 4 ------ 2 2 1 5 2 3 1 5 2 4 1 5 MAINTENANCE SHED M001 1. UNIT NUMBERS READ TOP TO BOTTOM (FLOOR 1-4) AS INDICATED ON THE UNIT STACK ONE BEDROOM UNITS TWO BEDROOM UNITS THREE BEDROOM UNITS LEGEND 3102 3202 3302 3402 3101 3201 3301 3401 3103 3203 3303 3403 3104 3204 3304 3404 3106 3206 3306 3406 3105 3205 3305 3405 3107 3207 3307 3407 3108 3208 3308 3408 3110 3210 3310 3410 3109 3209 3309 3409 3112 3212 3312 3412 3114 3214 3314 3414 3111 3211 3311 3411 3101 3201 3301 3401 TYPE A UNITS 3115 3215 3315 3415 3116 3216 3316 3416 ------ 3217 3317 3417 3118 3218 3318 3418 3119 3219 3319 3419 ------ 3220 3320 3420 ------ 3221 3321 3421 3122 3222 3322 3422 3123 3223 3323 3423 ------ 3224 3324 3424 1 1 0 5 1 2 0 5 1 3 0 5 1 4 0 5 NO UNIT - GARAGE ONLY----- * * * * * * *BUILDING SIGNAGE ------ 1 2 0 4 1 3 0 4 1 4 0 4 ------ 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 1 ------ ------ ------ 1 3 0 2 ------ ------ 1 2 0 3 1 3 0 3 1 4 0 3 1 1 0 6 1 2 0 6 1 3 0 6 1 4 0 6 1 1 0 7 1 2 0 7 1 3 0 7 1 4 0 7 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 1 0 8 1 2 0 8 1 3 0 8 1 4 0 8 1 1 0 9 1 2 0 9 1 3 0 9 1 4 0 9 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 2 1 5 1 3 1 5 1 4 1 5 1 1 1 6 1 2 1 6 1 3 1 6 1 4 1 6 1 1 1 7 1 2 1 7 1 3 1 7 1 4 1 7 ------ 1 2 1 8 1 3 1 8 1 4 1 8 ------ 1 2 1 5 1 3 1 5 1 4 1 5 ------ 1 2 1 4 1 3 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 4 1 2 2 4 1 3 2 4 1 4 2 4 1 1 2 5 1 2 2 5 1 3 2 5 1 4 2 5 1 1 2 8 1 2 2 8 1 3 2 8 1 4 2 8 1 1 2 9 1 2 2 9 1 3 2 9 1 4 2 9 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 1 3 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 1 1 3 6 1 2 3 6 1 3 3 6 1 4 3 6 1 1 3 7 1 2 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 4 3 7 ------ 1 2 1 9 1 3 1 9 1 4 1 9 ------ 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 4 2 2 ------ 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 3 1 4 2 3 ------ 1 2 2 6 1 3 2 6 1 4 2 6 ------ 1 2 2 7 1 3 2 7 1 4 2 7 ------ 1 2 3 0 1 3 3 0 1 4 3 0 ------ 1 2 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 4 3 1 ------ 1 2 3 4 1 3 3 4 1 4 3 4 ------ 1 2 3 5 1 3 3 5 1 4 3 5 1 1 3 8 1 2 3 8 1 3 3 8 1 4 3 8 APARTMENT PROJECTS WITH MULTIPLE BUILDINGS SHALL HAVE MONUMENT SIGNS ------- SHOWING THE STREET ADDRESSES OF EACH BUILDING AT EACH VEHICLE ENTRANCE TO THE SITE. EACH ETHICAL ENTRANCE SHALL ALSO HAVE AN ILLUMINATED SITE PLAN AND / OR DIRECTLY SIGNS. THE SIGNS SHALL SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE SIGN (THE VIEWER'S CURRENT LOCATION) AND ALL BUILDING ADDRESSES. DWELLING NUMBERS SHALL BE INCLUDED. THE MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. ALL SITE SIGNAGE TO BE PER OWNERS SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN AND UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. * INDICATE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ILLUMINATED BUILDING ADDRESS SIGNAGE. SIGNAGE FOR BUILDINGS MUST INCLUDE THE ENTIRE BUILDING ADDRESS AND STREET NAME. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE BUILDING SIGN SHALL HAVE A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND COLOR. 542 1st AVE. SOUTH, FLOOR 4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE LLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE II LLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE III PLLC © 2019 KATERRA ARCHITECTURE IV LLC ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, PLANS, IDEAS, ARRANGEMENTS AND DESIGNS REPRESENTED OR REFERRED TO ARE THE PROPERTY OF AND ARE OWNED BY KATERRA INC. WHETHER THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY ARE MADE IS EXECUTED OR NOT. THEY WERE CREATED, EVOLVED, DEVELOPED AND PRODUCED FOR THE SOLE USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROJECT AND NONE OF THE ABOVE MAY BE DISCLOSED OR GIVEN TO OR USED BY ANY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY USE OR PURPOSE WHATSOEVER INCLUDING ANY OTHER PROJECT, EXCEPT UPON WRITTEN PERMISSION AND DIRECTION OF KATERRA INC. Owner Consultant BLDG. 1 BLDG. 2 BLDG. 3 Key plan Revisions Mark Date Description N 10/30/2020 UNIT NUMBERING/ ADDRESSING SHEET(1,2,3) G.00.014 ALEXAN GATEWAY APARTMENTS 23000 MILITARY RD S, KENT, WA 98032 RM RM 075-18001 12/13/19 IFC SET Drawn By Project Manager Job Number Date Of Original Professional Seal SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0"1 UNIT NUMBERING PLAN NORTH 0 06/12/2019 PERMIT SET 2 01/09/2020 REV.3 ITCD UPDATES 6 05/22/2020 PC1 CORRECTIONS 18 AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) Phase 1B Phase 2 Phase 3 SE 260th St 18 9 t h A v e S E 1 8 8 t h A v e S E 19 1 s t P l S E SE 259th Pl 19 3 r d P l S E 19 6 t h A v e S E SE 2 5 9 t h S t SE 2 6 0 t h S t 19 9 t h A v e S E S E T i m b e r l a n e B l v d 198th Pl SE SE 2 5 6 t h S t SR 1 8 20 4 t h A v e S E 201s t A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h S t 20 3 r d A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h P l Phase 4 Phase 1A Phasing Legend Phasing MapLakepointe Urban Village Phasing MapLakepointe Urban Village 200 400 400' 0 100 SCALE: 1" = N NOTE: THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS. January 30, 2017 Phase 1B - Approximate Years 2019-2024 Phase 2 - Approximate Years 2020-2025 Phase 3 - Approximate Years 2023-2028 Establishment of final grade, construction of Covington Connector to Southeast boundary, construction of first phase of commercial development. Establishment of final lake perimeter, construction of 191st Place SE extension and associated R-12 residential development, construction of second phase of commercial development on peninsula. Construction of third phase of commercial development. Preliminary Plat approval in third quarter 2021. Construction and Final Plat Recording 2022. Phase 1A - Maple Hills Division 5 Phase 4 - Approximate Years 2020-2027 Completion of gravel pit reclamation, construction of MR and R-12 residential development Updated September 15, 2021 11 9 10 8 8 19 AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) 1 9 1 s t P l S E Jenkins Creek SE 260th St 18 9 t h A v e S E 1 8 8 t h A v e S E 19 1 s t P l S E SE 259th Pl 193 r d P l S E 19 6 t h A v e S E SE 2 5 9 t h S t SE 2 6 0 t h S t 19 9 t h A v e S E S E T i m b e r l a n e B l v d 198th Pl SE SE 2 5 6 t h S t SR 1 8 20 4 t h A v e S E 201s t A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h S t 20 3 r d A v e S E S E 2 5 8 t h P l B RCMU PARKS 24,956 SF 0.57 AC RCMU PARKS 97,621 SF 2.24 AC MR PARKS 110,686 SF 2.54 AC R-12 PARKS 14,185 SF 0.33 AC R-12 PARKS 12,500 SF 0.29 AC MR PARKS 128,425 SF 2.95 AC R-12 PARKS 32,553 SF 0.75 AC R-6 PARKS 14,112 SF 0.32 AC R-12 PARKS 7,254 SF 0.17 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 1,880,037 SF 43.16 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 572,210 SF 13.14 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 4,549 SF 0.10 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 34,788 SF 0.80 AC RCMU OPEN SPACE 86,894 SF 1.99 AC R-6 PARKS 9,908 SF 0.23 AC MR PARKS 12,799 SF 0.29 AC MR OPEN SPACE 22,507 SF 0.52 AC R-12 OPEN SPACE 5,687 SF 0.13 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 139,837 SF 3.21 AC R-6 OPEN SPACE 57,182 SF 1.31 AC P Covi n g t o n C o n n e c t o r Master Development PlanLakepointe Urban Village Master Development PlanLakepointe Urban Village January 30, 2017 Wetland Wetland Buffer Undisturbed Open Space Publicly Accessible Parks and Plazas Medium Density Residential (R-6) Central Pond Feature Covington Highlands Trail Trails / Offsite Trail Connections Stop Light Proposed Park and Ride Facility Transit Stop Proposed Truck and Bus Return Route Public Streets High Density Residential (R-12) Mixed Residential (MR) Mixed Use / Commercial (RCMU) Legend B Bike Route CENTRAL POND FEATURE Gateway Element Steep Slope and Buffer 200 400 400' 0 100 SCALE: 1" = N Proposed Trail Parking Focal Point / Public Gathering Spot Landscape Areas Jenkins Creek P Pedestrian / Wildlife Undercrossing NOTE: THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS AND TRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFIC LOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THE TERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS. Mix of Multi-Family and Commercial is Encouraged within Peninsula Area Updated September 15, 2021 Disturbed (Graded) Open Space SPECIAL PAVEMENT PARKS TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 122,577 SF 251,910 SF 66,492 SF 24,020 SF 2.81 AC 5.78 AC 1.53 AC 0.55 AC TOTAL 464,999 SF 10.67 AC POND TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 366,128 SF 106,040 SF 334,094 SF 0 SF 8.41 AC 2.43 AC 7.67 AC 0.00 AC TOTAL 806,262 SF 18.51 AC OPEN SPACE TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE 86,984 SF 22,507 SF 617,234 SF 2,077,056 SF 1.99 AC 0.52 AC 14.17 AC 47.68 AC TOTAL 2,803,691 SF 64.36 AC COMBINED OPEN SPACE TABLE RCMU MR R-12 R-6 ZONE PARKS 2.81 AC 5.78 AC 1.53 AC 0.55 AC TOTAL 10.67 AC 91.25 AC 34.00 AC 35.34 AC 53.51 AC 214.10 AC OPEN SPACE* POND 8.41 AC 2.43 AC 7.67 AC 0.00 AC 18.51 AC *OPEN SPACE INCLUDES CRITICAL AREAS, BUFFERS, AND OTHER GREEN SPACES 13.21 AC 8.73 AC 23.37 AC 48.23 AC 93.55 AC NET ACRES** 78.03 AC 25.27 AC 11.98 AC 5.27 AC 120.55 AC 1.99 AC 0.52 AC 14.17 AC 47.68 AC 64.36 AC GROSS ACREAGE TOTAL AMENITIES WILDLIFE / PEDESTRIAN UNDER-CROSSING **NET ACRES EQUALS GROSS ACREAGE MINUS TOTAL AMENITIES FUTURE CONNECTION BEYOND PROPERTY BY OTHERS 3 6 4 6 1 2 5 7 20 AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students more than functional capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C). Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity requirement (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim facilities: 1.To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2.To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3.To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated and maintained. The District's goal is to reduce the number of portables so we may provide an equitable learning environment for all. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 21 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family 0.229 0.109 0.087 0.037 0.113 Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K-5) Middle (Grades 6- 8) High (Grades 9-12)0.054 0.429 Total 0.200 0 0 0 OSPI - Square Footage per Student, see side chart Elementary 90 Middle 117 High 130 Special Education 144 12 25 $161,678 Elementary (Grades K- 5) Middle (Grades 6- 8) High (Grades 9-12) Total Projected Increased Student Capacity Elementary Middle High (Academy) Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) Middle (required) High (required)40 $0 $0 $68,000,000 Average Site Cost / Acre Elementary Middle High Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost $155,000,000 Elementary @ 24 $315,000 $220,000,000 Middle @ 29 $315,000 High @ 31 $315,000 State Funding Assistance Credit 123,702 District Funding Assistance Percentage 52.88% 10,256 21,296 155,254 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $375.00 1,567,594 760,483 District Average Assessed Value 1,077,315 Single Family Residence $594,679 3,405,392 District Average Assessed Value 1,691,296 Multi-Family Residence $310,811 770,739 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary Middle High Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary Middle High Total 4.4% Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary Middle High/Other Total 95.6% Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary Middle High/Other 1,098,611 Total 3,560,646 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $1.11 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0011 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.48% CPI Inflation Factor 5.80% Budget Preparations | OSPI (www.k12.wa.us) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A)May 2024 22 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor 12 $161,678 0 0.229 25 $0 0 0.087 A 1 (Elementary) A 2 (Middle) A 3 (High)40 $0 0 0.113 Total 77 $161,678 0 0.429 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio $68,000,000 0 0.229 0.903 $155,000,000 0 0.087 0.984 B 1 (Elementary) B 2 (Middle) B 3 (High)$220,000,000 0 0.113 0.998 Total $443,000,000 0 0.429 B $0.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio $315,000 24 0.229 0.097 $291.55 $315,000 29 0.087 0.016 $15.12 C 1 (Elementary) C 2 (Middle) C 3 (High)$315,000 31 0.113 0.020 $22.96 Total $945,000 84 0.429 C $329.63 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance %Student Factor $375.00 115 0.5288 0.229 $5,222.23 $375.00 148 0.5288 0.087 $2,553.31 D 1 (Elementary) D 2 (Middle) D 3 (High)$375.00 173 0.5288 0.113 $3,876.57 D $11,652.11 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$594,679 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.32 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.11%TC $5,473.99 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 3.48% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $0.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $329.63 Subtotal $329.63 D = State Match Credit per Residence $11,652.11 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $5,473.99 Subtotal $17,126.10 Total Unfunded Need ($16,796.47) 50% Developer Fee Obligation ($8,398) FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)$0 District Adjustment $8,398 Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family ($0.00) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B)May 2024 23 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor 12 $161,678 0 0.109 25 $0 0 0.037 A 1 (Elementary) A 2 (Middle) A 3 (High)40 $0 0 0.054 Total 77 $161,678 0 0.200 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio $68,000,000 0 0.109 0.903 $155,000,000 0 0.037 0.984 B 1 (Elementary) B 2 (Middle) B 3 (High)$220,000,000 0 0.054 0.998 Total $443,000,000 0 0.200 B $0.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio $315,000 24 0.109 0.097 $138.77 $315,000 29 0.037 0.016 $6.43 C 1 (Elementary) C 2 (Middle) C 3 (High)$315,000 31 0.054 0.020 $10.97 Total $945,000 84 0.200 C $156.18 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization %Student Factor $375.00 115 0.5288 0.109 $2,485.69 $375.00 148 0.5288 0.037 $1,085.89 $375.00 173 0.5288 0.054 $1,852.52 D $5,424.10 D 1 (Elementary) D 2 (Middle) D 3 (High) Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$310,811 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.32 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.11%TC $2,861.00 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 3.48% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $0.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $156.18 Subtotal $156.18 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $5,424.10 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $2,861.00 Subtotal $8,285.10 Total Unfunded Need ($8,128.92) 50% Developer Fee Obligation ($4,064) FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment $4,064 Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family ($0.00) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C)May 2024 24 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the functional capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the functional capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment “snapshot in time” to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the State of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2023 was 24,442 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2023, there were 1087 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 560 attended classes only at the college (“college-only”) and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy required capacity through the interim use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). While the District currently shows available capacity to address projected need on a purely statistical basis, there are variety of extenuating factors that need to be considered. The Kent School District currently makes significant use of portables, which we do not consider as part of our permanent standard of service. We have included portable space in our interim capacity figures, and we do not count that as a permanent space solution. Kent is unusual in that it incorporates neighborhoods intersecting with at least 6 municipalities, including Kent, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, and SeaTac. The district covers 73 square miles and includes over 40 schools. Within this large geographic area, we expect to have pockets of localized capacity need that are not necessarily reflected in the aggregate figures. As one example, the Lakepointe Urban Village development in Covington may require new classroom capacity even as space may exist in schools on the far other end of the District’s boundaries. 25 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Actual Permanent Functional Capacity 1 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) Additional Permanent Classrooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 Interim Portable Capacity Elementary Portable Capacity Required 3,255 3,201 3,201 3,201 3,201 3,201 3,201 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 High School Portable Capacity Required 608 608 608 608 608 608 608 Interim Portable Capacity Total 4,238 4,184 4,184 4,184 4,184 4,184 4,184 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 39,732 39,678 39,678 39,678 39,678 39,678 39,678 Total Enrollment/Projection 2 24,385 24,225 24,197 24,201 24,265 24,378 24,348 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 15,347 15,453 15,481 15,477 15,413 15,300 15,330 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Low Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2024 26 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 16,827 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 16,827 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Interim Portable Capacity 3,255 3,201 3,201 3,201 3,201 3,201 3,201 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 20,082 19,897 19,897 19,897 19,897 19,897 19,897 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 11,433 11,420 11,572 11,699 11,688 11,694 11,669 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 8,649 8,477 8,325 8,198 8,209 8,203 8,228 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Low Growth Model") ELEMENTARY: Grades K - 5 Elementary Grade K-5 P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2024 27 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Actual Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 7,575 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Changes to Middle School Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 7,575 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Portable Interim Capacity 1 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 7,950 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 7,591 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 5,819 5,919 5,946 5,925 6,032 6,209 6,335 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 2,131 1,672 1,645 1,666 1,559 1,382 1,256 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. MIDDLE SCHOOL: Grades 6 - 8 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Low Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D Middle School Grade 6-8 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2024 28 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Actual High Permanent Capacity 1 10,550 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Changes to High School Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 10,550 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Portables Interim Capacity 1 608 608 608 608 608 608 608 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 11,158 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 7,195 7,378 7,384 7,467 7,578 7,647 7,631 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 3,963 3,327 3,321 3,238 3,127 3,058 3,074 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Low Growth Model") HIGH SCHOOLS: Grades 9 - 12 P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2024 29 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2023-2024 through 2029-2030. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described below are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees were used at both River Ridge Elementary School and Kent Laboratory Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. `Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or interim portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or newly acquired interim portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac, and Unincorporated King County). Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Previously collected impact fees may be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of interim instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities, the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. The Kent School District 2023-2024 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects, the 2018 Levy Projects, and the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams had come together and joined the Capital 30 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) which included District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voices, as well as community members who collaborated and discussed the District’s needs. The initial plan revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. We started with a list of 2 billion in needs and through itemizing and prioritizing, we brought the list of essential projects to 495 million. This list was brought before the District’s Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure followed and went out to vote in April 2023 and did not pass with voter approval. After the failure to pass the 2023 Bond , we re-evaluated needs and for next steps. Surveys went out to the community to see what people would like to prioritize from the list of needed projects. A new list of projects was presented through the 2023 Levy in November. This levy did not pass. This list was again taken and revised to prioritize projects that are critical to operations and life safety within our buildings. In April we set forth our 2024 Levy to a vote, which also did not receive the needed support to pass. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include details of any adopted planning . With the opening of Canyon Ridge Middle School, our sixth grade moving from elementary to middle school, and our boundary change, we have advanced opportunities to even out capacity at each site to accommodate our programs, district-wide site capacity, and student-based needs. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction estimated costs are based on the last elementary school built in Kent, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost future elementary school, as well as average pricing of nearby school districts recently built new m iddle and new high school projects. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School $68,000,000 New Middle School $155,000,000 New High School $220,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C result in a zero-dollar impact fee total for this year but may be adjusted if needed per RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b) provision. 31 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES *2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL Local & State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES No School Projects at this time.$0 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3 - 4 $0 OTHER N / A Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 May 2024 32 AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years Type & # on Map School / Site Year Open / Purchased Sold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / Acre Elementary No Acquisitions for Elemenary Schools 0.00 $0 Elementary Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Elem site average Middle School No Acquisitions for Middle Schools 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle Schl Site Avg. High No Acquisitions for High 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17 1 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS)1984 2 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard)1992 4 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline)1995 0.00 $0 5 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property)1993 0 0 0 9 / Rural Site - McMillan Assemblage (South of MC)98 - 04 10 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288)1999 12a / Urban Site - 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom)2004 12b / Urban Site - SE 256th St. Covington (West of CO)2004 16 Site - 11027 SE Kent-Kangley Kent, WA 98030 2023 16a Site - 11109 SE Kent-Kangley Kent, WA 98030 2023 Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre #DIV/0! Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 May 2024 33 AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . b ) IX - Summary of Changes to June 2024 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2023 Plan are summarized here. Capacity changes continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio and program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The District moved to a K-5 Elementary and 6-8 Middle School model beginning at the 2023- 2024 school year. Capacity has been added at the middle school level by reopening the original Sequoia Junior High (now Canyon Ridge Middle School). The District worked with Educational Data Solutions, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The District expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility need will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2024 calendar year will result in no collection of impact fees for both Single-Family and Multi-Family due to the capacity study completed in spring 2024. 34 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) ITEM Grade /Type FROM TO Increase/ Decrease Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.248 0.229 -0.019 Single Family (SF)MS 0.085 0.087 0.002 SH 0.107 0.113 0.006 Total 0.440 0.429 -0.011 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.130 0.109 -0.021 Multi-Family (MF)MS 0.049 0.037 -0.012 SH 0.056 0.054 -0.002 Total 0.235 0.200 -0.035 State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”)51.86%52.88%1.02%Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $246.83 $375.00 128.170 Per OSPI Website Link Average Assessed Valuation (AV)SF $653,485 $594,679 (58,806)King County AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts.MF $290,599 $310,811 20,212 King County Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.02 $1.11 $0.09 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.58%3.48%-0.10%Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan May 202435 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 1 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Stefanie McIrvin, Ed. D, President Justin Booker, Vice President Avanti Bergquist, MD Susan Talley Pam Teal Damien Pattenaude, Ed. D, Superintendent July 2024 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 2 To Be Adopted by School Board June 26, 2024 2024 6-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Annual Update Renton School District No. 403 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. ENROLLMENT TRENDS III. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS V. GROWTH RELATED PROJECTS VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN VII. IMPACT FEES VIII. APPENDICES AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 3 I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan: This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) annual update was prepared by Renton School District (the “District”) in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21A.43, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton. It is the district’s intent that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton as a sub-element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans, and that that those jurisdictions assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of the district, as empowered by the GMA. This Plan, however, is not intended to be the sole planning instrument developed by the district to determine its capital facility needs. The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing development, most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area. The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington’s growth by developing and implementing comprehensive land-use and transportation plans, by designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally critical areas. The Capital Facilities Plan is one element of a County or City’s Comprehensive Plan that addresses existing public facility capacities, forecasts future public facility needs, presents a plan for expanding existing facilities or constructing new facilities to meet those needs, and indicates how those public facility improvements are to be financed. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as one means of financing new public facilities necessitated by private development. This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by examining: 1. anticipated growth of the district’s student population over the next six years. 2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to house those students based on the district’s current Standard of Service. 3. the need for additional enrollment or growth driven capital facilities. 4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and 5. calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number of students generated by recent residential development (student generation factors). This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub-element in their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and the Cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton. The district continues to dialogue with the cities of Tukwila and SeaTac regarding implementation of impact fees within their jurisdictions. The new impact fees calculated and associated with this 2024 CFP, are effective Jan 2025. They are further defined in section VII and in the appendices. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) effective effective IMPACT FEES January January CHANGE 2024 2025 SINGLE-FAMILY $2,161 $1,003 ($1,158) MULTI-FAMILY $4,257 $3,268 ($989) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 4 Overview of the Renton School District: The district is located on the south end of Lake Washington, eleven miles south of Seattle to the west and south of Bellevue to the east. Home to nearly 100,000 people who value working, living, and playing in the Pacific Northwest, Renton has a strong economic base and a favorable business climate. The district spans approximately thirty-two square miles and serves a diverse population of approximately 15,000 students in pre-K through 12th grade at 4 high schools, four middle schools, fifteen elementary schools, and an early childhood learning center. District programs also address the special needs of disabled, academically gifted, and artistically talented students. Four schools (Renton Park Elementary, Hazelwood Elementary, McKnight Middle, and Lindbergh High) are U.S. Department of Education-recognized Blue-Ribbon Schools of Excellence. Community support for Renton schools is strong. School levies, which make up 25% of the district's budget, have been consistently approved by the community for more than 20 years. Voter-approved bond measures or capital facilities levies from 1992 through 2022 have brought exciting improvements in school buildings and support facilities, including the rebuilding of all elementary schools, the remodeling of all middle and high schools, and the recent additional construction of a new elementary school (Sartori) and middle school (Risdon). Voter support has also provided state-of-the-art technology - a must to prepare students for living and working in this leading high-tech region. Every classroom has high-speed Internet connections and ample computer devices for all students. Creating life-long learners is at the heart of Renton School District's instructional goals. Students are encouraged to reach for excellence through a variety of programs that focus on basic academic skills, problem solving, creative and critical thinking, and social and emotional growth. Each year, Renton School District students qualify as National Merit Finalists while the total value of college scholarships earned is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Elementary level students are well-grounded in science through participation in the Hands-on Science Kit Program, lauded by the National Science Teachers' Association. At the high school level, the district's challenging chemistry program, which provides options for advanced placement college credit, has been recognized by the National Science Association, as well as the National Science Foundation. The focus in math is on intensive instruction in the basic skills, supplemented by opportunities to apply developing knowledge to real world problems. The K-12 math program increases student achievement through problem solving, integration of technology, and a rigorous assessment component. Students from elementary to high school levels regularly excel AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 5 in regional and national mathematics contests. Across all levels and subjects, reading with accuracy and understanding is a primary goal. Elementary students receive a rich exposure to fine literature. Middle and high school students work extensively on reading in the content areas and exploring classic and modern literature works. Reading activities are integrated with a topnotch writing program beginning in kindergarten that provides students with intensive and focused practice for the proficiency in a wide range of language arts skills from creative to business and technical writing. A variety of classes, clubs, and programs give students opportunities to expand their educational horizons and pursue special interests. Choices range from instrumental and music, performing and visual arts, intramurals and athletics, academic-focused and career clubs, and community service opportunities to leadership development programs, business internships, job shadowing, and participation in the annual robotics competition. Special needs students with physical, emotional, and academic disabilities receive individualized attention from skilled teachers. Special education and remedial support are also available and children who are just learning English receive intensive, small-group ESL instruction to supplement their regular classroom learning. Guidance and counseling services are available for primary, middle, and high school students. Intellectually gifted children have many opportunities for extended learning. Operating at two magnet elementary schools and the three middle schools, the Discovery Program offers a challenging curriculum with a special focus on higher level thinking skills. High school students can take advantage of a full range of honors and advanced placement classes. Renton School District staff consistently show a commitment to their most important task - preparing their students for success in work and life. More than 80 percent of certificated staff have five or more years of higher education, and two of every three teachers have advanced degrees in their fields. Several of the district's certificated and classified staff have received the Washington Award for Educational Excellence. Individual teachers have received special honors such as the Christa McAuliffe Award for Excellence in Education, the Outstanding Secondary Science Award, the Washington State High School Social Studies Teacher of the Year Award, and Outstanding College Alumni recognition. Teachers are encouraged to take an active role in promoting their own professional growth through creating and refining curriculum, sharing successful strategies, and looking for new ways to assess student progress. This focus on continuous staff development enables teachers to consistently improve the quality of instruction and prepares them to help students meet rigorous state academic standards. Hundreds of training opportunities are offered to teachers and other staff members each year, ranging from CPR and first aid, technology education, diversity, and crisis intervention to math, science, and reading instruction strategies, assessment techniques, and arts education. II. ENROLLMENT TRENDS Over the past few years, District enrollment has continued to decline, consistent with much of the region. There have been some net gains in specific areas, but overall, the region is still experiencing declines in enrollment. While enrollment decline in some areas may still be due to the pandemic, we continue to monitor lower growth rate of immigrant population and increases in homebased instruction. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 6 The district will continue to monitor trends, but there are significant conditions that may speak to the potential for enrollment growth in the future. The number of new housing units currently under construction and expected to be completed in the next 2-3 years is larger than what has been experienced in the last decade. While interest rates have held steady, housing prices are increasing in some areas due to a lack of inventory. We are monitoring the effect of this on new home buyers and if new construction will continue the next few years. Discussion continues whether enrollment will return to pre-pandemic levels and if so, when. The early learning model in most cases had been through remote delivery methods and returned to partial in-person learning in 2020-2021. The district returned to in-person learning in the 2021- 2022 school year, with families still having an option for a virtual program – but it was not highly utilized. Still, the District will not fully understand the ongoing impact of instructional delivery, the current housing market, fuel increases, among others until further into the next couple of school years. Approval by the community of a 2019 bond measure allowed the district to construct a new elementary school (#16) to accommodate over-enrollment in the K-5 grade span and to provide some elementary capacity relief. Sartori, another new elementary was opened in 2018 as a choice school in the downtown area. Considering the decline in enrollment and the effect of the pandemic, the district chose to supplement the 2020 CFP by further evaluating the enrollment and capacity of the elementary schools located within or near the service areas the new elementary school #16. The conclusion of that analysis reaffirmed the district need for the new elementary school. #16, named Hilltop Heritage Elementary School – opened fall of 2023. The Renton School District community also supported a $676 M bond in November of 2022. This bond includes fund for continued building security system upgrades, seismic upgrades, building systems upgrades, and for property acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School. Property acquisition is currently in process and the project is in early design stages. There is growth related capacity planned for this project, however it will be reviewed more closely as it gets closer to construction and with more up to date projections. III. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the district that identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (considering the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the district to be beneficial in supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major determining factor, together with the number of classrooms (teaching stations), in calculating facility capacity. The district has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through 8 in middle schools, and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school-year calendar adopted by the AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 7 District is also traditional; typically beginning in late August and ending in mid-June. Similarly, the District maintains a common daily schedule, with classes beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., depending on grade level. The district, and the Renton Education Association, recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following targets in student/teacher ratios: Grade Levels K-1 21:1 Grade Level 2 22:1 Grade Level 3 24:1 Grade Levels 4-12 29:1 The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science, Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios apply as follows: Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 Middle School PE 35:1 High School PE 40:1 All other classes 31:1 For the purposes of this report, student /teacher ratio for special education classes held in self- contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. In response to new State and District high school graduation requirements, beginning with the 2018-2019 school year, all District high schools changed from a semester system to a trimester system, resulting in the following: • Three 12-week terms instead of two 18-week terms, • Five 72-minute periods per day instead of six 57-minute periods, and • Reduction of classroom efficiency from 83% to 80%, reducing facility capacity. Beginning with the graduating class of 2020-2021, high school graduation requirements require one additional credit of science (three instead of two), and a total of twenty-four credits; three more than the previously required 21. This has impacted high school capacity, especially regarding science classrooms, where additional classroom space suitable for the various sciences, or the renovation/upgrade of existing classrooms to accommodate the same, will be necessary. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 8 The construction of new science classroom addition at Lindbergh High is one such project included in last year’s update. This was not a growth generated project. Therefore, this project costs were not included in the calculation of last year’s impact fees or the current (2025) calculation of impact fees. Student/teacher ratios, referenced earlier, are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, since relocatable facilities do not allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the district, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and development driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. For those reasons, relocatable classrooms capacities are calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs. Program Capacity Model: The Program Capacity Model calculates building capacity based on limitations that existing facilities place on enrollment because of current educational program needs, operating policy, and contractual restrictions. This has been referred to as the Practical Capacity Model in the years past. It is sometimes also referred to School Program Capacity. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each classroom/teaching station in each facility. For every room housing student, a calculation is made, assigning a maximum number of students per room. Sometimes the capacity of core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gym, or the quantity of restroom fixtures, may limit facility capacity to a level below that calculated by collective classroom capacity levels. This has generally been reviewed at each school level, giving each school leadership team the ability to utilize classrooms in the most efficient manner possible, considering their current enrollment. If enrollment begins to grow more rapidly in the near future, the district may begin to evaluate and report program capacity more specifically and show the impact on overall capacity. For example, if the school enrollment has a higher number of special ed students each year, then there is potential for another full classroom/teaching station to be taken out of capacity inventory, thereby reducing the overall school capacity for that given year. Given that we entered into a year with boundary adjustments to accommodate the opening of the new elementary school (Hilltop Heritage ES), the 2024 CFP could be considered to be a more appropriate year to provide further analysis of enrollment at each school, overall capacity, and program (practical) capacity. However due to continued enrollment decline, the district is not providing a detailed analysis between building capacity and program capacity currently. Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by class scheduling restrictions and student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical middle school six-period day, where one period is designated for teacher planning, capacity is reduced by one-sixth, or 17 percent, of theoretical capacity. Similarly, at high schools, with the newly established five-period day, capacity is reduced by one-fifth, or 20 percent. Elective classes, many of which require specialized classrooms, also figure into the equation for determining a school’s capacity, which together with required classes, require a well thought out Master Schedule if the facility’s capacity is to be maximized. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 9 Current Capacity: Overall building (student) capacity of existing, permanent K-12 facilities, excluding special education facilities and facilities housing alternative learning environments, is now 15,438 with the opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School fall of 2023. As mentioned above, the district may begin to review each school in future years, if growth requires a more detailed comparison between building capacity and program capacity at each school, and/or at each grade span. Based on prior enrollment the district has shown a capacity deficit in the 6-8 grade span in the out years; as well as continued, yet smaller deficit in the K-5 grade span. That deficit has transitioned to a capacity surplus with recent enrollment decline but also shows more of a surplus now due to the recent opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School The opening of the new school this last fall did allow for relief at the over-crowded schools. It also allowed the district to intentionally have a lower enrollment at a couple of schools where some building improvements are needed before large new developments finish construction and begin to generate students in the area. We continue to note also that current and future capacity at the elementary level, as documented in this report, is based on the district’s current Standard of Service, and does not necessarily reflect aspirational K-3 student/teacher ratios of seventeen students to one teacher. The district continues to make progress towards these requirements, by utilizing available classroom space, added staffing and plans to utilize the new elementary school classrooms to work towards this ratio. Most recent ratios have been anywhere from 17.3 to 19:1 but staffing during covid has slowed the districts progress. Elementary school capacity has been the district’s greatest challenge. Relying heavily on the use of relocatable classrooms (portables) to accommodate the fluctuating student population, portables at elementary schools account for over 15% of the district’s total K – 5 facility capacity. Portables are not considered permanent structures and are therefore not included in the inventory of permanent facilities. They are viewed as a short-term solution for managing enrollment fluctuation, housing students on a temporary or interim basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. Even with the opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School in fall of 2023, the district is not yet able to greatly reduce the number of temporary portable facilities. Renton School District’s capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (interim or portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12 (traditional elementary, middle, and high school configurations), Special Instructional Use, or Non-instructional Support Facilities. The district’s permanent K-12 facilities include 16 elementary schools, four middle schools, and four high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the district’s early childhood, special education, and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include the Kohlwes Education Center (admin.), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium, and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,595,263 square feet, with 2,417,847 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 10 The district’s relocatable K-12 facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on an interim or temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of the fifty-five relocatable facilities in the district’s inventory, forty-four are “double portables” containing two classrooms, and eleven are singles. Combined, they provide the district with a total of ninety-nine relocatable classrooms, encompassing 88,704 square feet of additional space available for instruction. The tables below summarize existing K-12 facility capacity. A complete inventory of District facilities, including undeveloped property follows. Facility capacity worksheets may be found in the appendices. EXISTING FACILITY CAPACITY ELEMENTARY MIDDLE FACILITY TYPE HIGH SCHOOLS TOTAL SCHOOLS SCHOOLS PERMANENT 7,545 85.77% 3,435 88.25% 4,458 97.97% 15,438 89.55% RELOCATABLE 1,252 14.23% 457 11.75% 92 2.03% 1,801 10.45% TOTAL 8,797 100.00% 3,892 100.00% 4,550 100.00% 17,239 100.00% INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF RELOCATEABLE CLASSROOMS Building ID Location Number of School ID Area Student Classrooms Numbers (sq. ft.) Capacity 53 McKnight Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 54 Nelsen Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 55 Nelsen Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 56 Nelsen Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 57 Nelsen Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 59 Lindbergh High 1 2 896 21 60 Lindbergh High 1 3 896 21 61 Lindbergh High 1 4 896 21 62 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 2 896 29 64 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 1 896 29 65 Dimmitt Middle 1 3 896 23 66 Dimmitt Middle 1 4 896 23 69 Honey Dew Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 70 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 3 896 29 72 McKnight Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 73 Lakeridge Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 74 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 77 McKnight Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) 78 McKnight Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 79 Dimmitt Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 80 Honey Dew Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 81 Cascade Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 82 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 83 Lindbergh High 2 5/6 1,792 42 84 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 85 Dimmitt Middle 1 5 896 23 86 Dimmitt Middle 1 6 896 23 87 Dimmitt Middle 1 7 896 23 88 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 89 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 90 Honey Dew Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 91 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 92 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 93 Spring Glen 2 1/3 1,792 46 94 Spring Glen 2 2/4 1,792 46 95 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 96 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 97 Cascade Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 98 Cascade Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 99 Lakeridge Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 100 Lakeridge Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 101 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 102 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 103 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 104 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 105 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 106 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 107 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 108 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 109 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 110 Hazelwood Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 111 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 9/10 1,792 58 112 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 11/12 1,792 58 113 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 114 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 Total 99 88,704 2,669 *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 11 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF PERMANENT FACILITIES NAME LOCATION AREA (ft2) DESIGN CAPACITY Benson Hill 18665 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 67,533 520 Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 49,157 338 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 57,072 332 S Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59,164 467 LO Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 66,161 591 OH Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, 98056 60,000 547 C S Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 54,620 336 YR Kennydale 1700 NE 28th St., Renton, 98056 65,169 622 AT Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, 98178 52,958 398 EN Maplewood Heights. 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 56,220 402 EM E L Renton Park 16828 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 65,955 476 Sartori 332 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 76,797 554 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 53,992 472 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 57,844 460 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 58,758 380 Hilltop Heritage 1075 Duvall Ave NE 98059 77,000 650 Total Grades K-5 Capacity 978,400 7,545 Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 109,070 794 McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 126,706 847 E S L L D O Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 124,234 896 D OIHMC Risdon 6928 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 136,582 898 S Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 496,592 3,435 S Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 327,395 1,462 LO Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 242,662 1,211 OH C Renton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, 98057 278,373 1,389 S H Talley 7800 S 132nd St., Renton, 98178 70,831 397 G IH Total Grades 9-11 Capacity 919,261 4,458 TOTAL GRADE LEVELS K-12 2,394,253 15,438 G Meadow Crest EEC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, 98056 68,752 464 NI HOME Program - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 7,005 84 NR A Renton Academy - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 24,837 48 E LT L A Total Instructional Special Use 100,594 596 Total Instructional Facilities 2,494,847 16,034 T S R EC Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 21,894 PO IV Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, 98057 57,000 UP ER S S Lindbergh Pool 16740 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 13,600 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 12 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Nutrition Services / Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton 98057 27,466 Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, 98057 37,213 Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 20,243 Total Support Services 177,416 Total All Permanent Facilities 2,672,263 RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SCHOOL* ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 88, 89, 109 5,376 174 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 95, 96, 101, 102 7,168 232 Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 81, 97, 98 5,376 174 Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 110 1,792 58 Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 69. 80. 90. 91 7,168 232 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, 98178 73, 99, 100 5,376 174 84, 103, 104, 105, Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 111, 112 10,752 348 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 74, 82, 106, 107 7,168 232 62, 64, 70, 113, Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 114 6,272 203 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 92, 108 3,584 116 Elementary School Total Capacity 60,032 1943 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 13 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity 65, 66, 79, 85, 86, Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 87 6,272 161 McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 184 Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 184 Middle School Total 20,608 529 HIGH SCHOOLS Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59, 60, 61, 83 4,480 105 High School Total 4,480 105 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 14 INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIAL USE Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity 2607 Jones Ave. S, Spring Glen Renton, 98055 93, 94 3,584 92 Special Education Total 3,584 92 TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE 88,704 2669 CLASSROOMS *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Skyway Site S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S, Seattle 4.18 Acres IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Projection Methodology: Numerous methodologies are available for projecting long-term enrollments. The most common method is known as cohort survival which tracks groups of students through the system and adjusts the populations to account for the average year-to- year growth. For example, this year’s fourth grade is adjusted based on the average enrollment trend of the past in order to estimate next year’s fifth grade enrollment. This calculation method considers the past five years’ trends to determine the average adjustment factor for each grade, or cohort. The method works well for all grades except kindergarten, where there is no previous year data. For kindergarten, two methodologies are generally used: A linear extrapolation from the previous five years of kindergarten enrollment, assuming that there is a trend; or, alternatively, a comparison of the kindergarten enrollment to births from five years prior can be used to calculate a “birth-to-k” ratio. For example, kindergarten enrollment in 2019 is divided by the total births in King County in 2014 to produce a birth-to-k ratio. The average ratio for the last five years can then be applied to births in subsequent years to estimate kindergarten enrollment. The cohort survival method has been used by OSPI to predict enrollments for all Districts in the state. In past years, OSPI has used a 6-year cohort average for grades 1-12 and a linear extrapolation method at kindergarten. In 2008, OSPI commissioned a study to evaluate the effectiveness of this method for predicting enrollment. The report recommended the use of the “birth-to-k” method for predicting kindergarten enrollment and the use of a housing adjustment factor for Districts that are likely to be impacted by large numbers of new housing developments. The cohort survival method generally works well for Districts that have a consistent trend of gradual increases or declines in enrollment. It is less reliable in Districts where spikes in demographic trends (especially a marked increase or decrease in new housing) can lead to dramatic swings in enrollment from one year to the next. In addition, the use of the linear AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 15 extrapolation method at the kindergarten level can result in a distorted trend since it does not consider changes in birth rate trends. Combining cohort survival with other information about births, housing, regional population trends, and even trends in service area and private school enrollment can sometimes provide for a more accurate forecast. For this Plan, the average rollup at existing grades was combined with estimates of growth that might be expected from new housing, and assumptions about market share gains or losses that the district is likely to see at certain grade levels. Estimates of housing growth for this model were obtained from building permit information provided by the respective jurisdictions. However, there are many unknowns due to the overall market pause in real estate, rising gas prices, inflation, and some still consider the pandemic to be of concern. The districts response to this was to consider three projections: a low, medium, and high. Due to inflation and rising interest rates, real estate prices were leveling off, decreasing in some neighborhoods, but more recently housing prices have been increasing due to a lack of inventory. With families who purchased their homes during record low interest rates, many are opting to stay put rather than risk higher payments due to larger interest rates. Overall, this has caused a tightening of inventory and has been causing prices to increase and competitive offers over and above list rates. It is too soon to expand on the relative prices seen in Renton as compared to outlying and more expensive suburban areas. We could still experience a higher-than-expected growth rate, but do not expect that until a few years out. Because the District needs to be as prepared as possible for a higher growth rate, we are monitoring all three scenarios. There is more potential for growth in the K-5 and high school grade span in the outyears and some decline is anticipated in the 6-8 grade span. Projections and Future Capacity: Enrollment 2023 projections provided by Educational Data Solutions, LLC indicate continued decline in the elementary grade span over the next couple of years, with a minor decrease in middle school and high school enrollment at varied years, but overall, a relatively flat rate in the big picture. Using the high-level growth chart, overall enrollment in the out-years is projected to grow by about six hundred students spread over all three grades spans, but still does not project we are back to pre-pandemic enrollment levels until after October 2028. The district will continue to monitor development, move-in/move-outs, and trends within the four-county area to better predict enrollment more than two years out. For the 2024 CFP, the district opted to continue use of the 2023 projections provided by Educational Data Solutions, LLC due to the reported region flat growth that is continuing. An updated analysis will likely be used for the 2025 CFP. As the District continues to move past the pandemic and related impacts, there is potential for development growth in the real estate market and potential for a resurgence of immigrant population. The local jurisdiction is still planning on over 5,000 new residential units in various areas over the next 2-10 years. Much of that development construction is nearing completion in the Sierra Heights Elementary school feeder area. It is the district’s responsibility to monitor these projects, the timing and how the district will be able to respond with appropriate capacity to accommodate instructional delivery. The number of new homes planned for future construction in the District continues to be higher than the number of permitted units that were built between 2017 and 2021.This may suggest that AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 16 enrollment losses could be lower in the near terms but could see net gains in the out-years due to growth from new housing. (see past and future housing development in the appendices) Projections show a near term flat growth rate but do project an increase in middle school enrollment over the next six years of 381 students, when considering high growth projections. There are currently no plans to increase middle school capacity, as even with a slight growth, enrollment would still not be back to pre-pandemic levels. Using the same high projection at the high school level, projected enrollment over the next six years will add an additional 290 students. If these projections hold in the near term, this growth could coincide with district plans to replace Renton High School. As part of the voter approved November 2022 bond, funds are provided for both land acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School. The District is currently in the process of acquiring 43 parcels north of the existing Renton High School and is in early planning and design. Groundbreaking is estimated to be in spring of 2027 for a planned opening in fall of 2029. Renton High School enrollment has held steady between 1000 and 1200 students over the past six years and current enrollment exceeds pre-pandemic enrollment by 35 students. With a planned opening in fall of 2029, current elementary grade span students will be entering high school, with larger current enrollment numbers in the 4th and 5th grade, consistent with pre-pandemic enrollment levels. The new Renton High School is designing for an increase in capacity to accommodate enrollment growth, which will allow for 1800 students. PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH OCT. ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL OCT. 2029/30 PROJECTED PERCENTAGE 0CT. CHANGE CHANGE (%) 2022/2023 PROJECTED CHANGE CHANGE 2023/24 2022/23 - 2022/23 - HEADCOUNT HEADCOUNT 2023 - 2029 2023 - 2029 HEADCOUNT 2023/24 2023/24 (high) ELEMENTARY 6,657 6,550 7,225 (107.00) (1.61%) 675 10.31% MIDDLE 3,208 3,094 3,475 (114.00) (3.55%) 381 12.31% HIGH 4,337 4,304 4,594 (33) (0.76%) 290 6.74% other/alt 181 177 194 8 - 16 - TOTAL 14,383 14,125 15,294 (258.00) (1.81%) 1169.00 8.28% V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS With the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in August 2018, the 2017 elementary deficit capacity of 1,244 was dramatically reduced by nearly 40% to 755. With the passage of the 2019 Bond Measure, approved by the voters in November 2019, the District opened its sixteenth elementary school, located in the Hazen High School service area, where the district has experienced the most recent growth in the past decade plus. Hilltop Heritage Elementary School opened for the 2023/2024 school year. Opening this new school did help to balance out enrollment vs. capacity this past school year and provided an overall increase in capacity for the AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 17 elementary grade span. Projections used for the 2023 CFP showed growth in this grade span by over 400 students in the out years. Because the district opted to use last year’s set of low, medium, and high projects, the district is still preparing for this projection in the out years and will take a closer look in the 2025 CFP. At the middle school level, decreased enrollment combined with lower projections show that the district will continue to have a small surplus in the next year. We will continue to monitor, but there are currently no enrollment or growth driven capital facilities projects in the planning stages for middle schools. However, there is discussion for future bond planning, the need to replace both Nelson Middle School and Dimmitt Middle School. Those projects would be reviewed in future bond planning discussions and enrollment growth and projections would be considered at that time. As previously mentioned, the 2022 voter-approved bond allows the district to acquire property and plan for the replacement of Renton High School. This will be both an opportunity to add program capacity to address anticipated and projected growth in the out years, but to also ensure program equity across the high school grade space. The district desires to ensure educational space and opportunity is provided and comparable to what is offered at both Hazen and Lindbergh High Schools. In addition to any discussion around projected permanent facility deficits at the elementary and high school levels, it should be noted that the District is also reaching its maximum limit in providing portable classrooms at its existing sites due to current land use and building code requirements. Although not included in the calculation of potential Impact Fees, the implementation of new relocatable classrooms and/or the relocation of existing ones, remains a viable method of addressing both growth and the shifting of student population, for the short term. Similarly, science classroom additions proposed for Lindbergh High School, as well as other potential high school renovations, additions, or relocations responding to enrollment growth and/or changes in capacity methodology, are not included in the calculation of these fees. Those current projects are more related to program needs and existing enrollment. We have not considered these projects to be added capacity at the high school grade span. The next table compares the current permanent capacity of Renton School District facilities to current and projected enrollment for the next six years. As noted earlier, the district may take a closer look at overall permanent capacity compared to practical or program capacity in future CFPs, if enrollment begins to recover in a more rapid fashion. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 18 Capital Construction Plan: For the last six-year period, the district’s highest priorities have been to address existing and projected facility capacity deficits, aging infrastructure at secondary schools, and responding to/planning for both growth and program related added capacity. These projects funded by the 2019 bond and impact fees, are projects responding to growth. This has included: • Completion of Hilltop Heritage Elementary school - most of the growth has occurred and relief is needed at some schools in the Hazen High School service area – in the elementary grade-span. • High school additions and/or renovations to create additional science classroom/laboratory space to address changes in State graduation requirements. • Planning for replacement of Renton High School, Dimmitt Middle School and/or Nelson Middle School – all aging facilities and potentially impacted by growth. • Acquisition of land for future development • Addition and or relocation of relocatable classrooms (interim classroom space known as portables) During the next six years, the district’s voter approved bond on the Nov. 8, 2022, election ballot will allow the district to stay on track to make major renovations, replacements, and upgrades to keep our schools in top operating condition, while protecting taxpayer investments in our buildings and helping maintain high property values. Currently, these may not be growth generated project, but are evaluated every year. These include: SURPLUS / DEFICIT CAPACITY PROJECTIONS1 2024/25 - 2029/30 *23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 **PERMANENT CAPACITY 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545ELEM. STUDENT ENROLLMENT 6,550 6,488 6,636 6,697 7,040 7,142 7,225K-5 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY)995 1,057 909 848 505 403 320 **PERMANENT CAPACITY 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435MIDDLE STUDENT ENROLLMENT 3,094 3,138 3,276 3,285 3,417 3,407 3,4756-8 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY)341 297 159 150 18 28 (40) **PERMANENT CAPACITY 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,669HIGH STUDENT ENROLLMENT 4,304 4,381 4,386 4,266 4,482 4,537 4,5949-12 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY)154 77 72 192 (24) (79) 75 1. Does not include relocatable facilities (portables) *current enrollment LOW range projection - 24/25 MEDIUM range projection - 25/26 & 26/27 HIGH range projection - 27/28 and beyond **permanent capacity will be EVALUATED to program capacity in CFP 2025 or later AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 19 Safety & Security • Interior door hardware/lock updates • New key system • Main entry video intercoms • Entryway improvements to provide front door line-of-sight for office staff. School Improvements Purchase Property Build New Renton High School – at a location to be determined. • Update seismic and structural systems in older buildings (retrofitting and modification of existing structures to make them more resistant to seismic activity, ground motion, or soil failure) • Improvements and equipment replacement of school Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems • Upgrades to electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems • Upgrades to boilers and domestic hot water heaters • Provide for up to forty acres for a Renton High School replacement. • Build a new high school facility for the Renton High School service area, providing a modern learning environment and equitable athletic opportunities for all students. The District’s intent in structuring its capital improvement program is to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period to optimize the utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house project management (Capital Projects Office) and outside management consultants to accomplish this. VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Finance Plan: The primary funding sources for all capital construction projects scheduled over the next six years include 2022 Bond funds, remaining funds from the 2022 capital levy; and school impact fees currently collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton throughout 2024, as growth projects that addressed past capacity deficits are completed. Growth driven projects funded by past collected impact fees and 2019 bond funds are nearing completion. The majority of those recent bond funds will be directed towards land acquisition and the replacement of Renton High School, as previously described. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 20 While there could be placement of temporary facilities or portables due to growth over the next six years at various locations, depending upon enrollment growth - the district will evaluate if the replacement of the high school will need to increase capacity due to growth. Construction of this school will not begin for 2-3 years, due to the need for land acquisition. If enrollment and projections show additional capacity is needed to accommodate growth, we will evaluate the collection of impact fees at that time. Enrollment driven projects represent only a portion of the district’s total capital improvement plan. Estimated expenditures for enrollment driven projects over the duration of this six-year plan are indicated below. II. IMPACT FEES Impact Fees: Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621, resulting in a decrease in impact fees for single-family of $1158.00 per unit – now set at $1003.00, and a decrease in impact fees for multi-family of $989.00 per unit – now set at $3268.00 Student generation factors used last year are also being used this year. Calculations in 2022 included increased construction costs, and while costs have continued to increase, the district did not add additional construction costs into the calculation for 2023 impact fees or for 2024 calculations. Future CFP’s will review enrollment, projections, and projected growth to determine if any growth-related projects are needed to address potential capacity deficits moving forward in any of the grade spans. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as a means of supplementing the funding of additional public facilities necessitated by enrollment growth from new development. In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential new development. To determine an equitable school impact fee throughout unincorporated King SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN - GROWTH DRIVEN PROJECTS Estimated Expenditures1 ($1,000,000's)Funding ($1,000,000's)Project *2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Secured2 Unsecured3 New Elem. School 60 6 2 68 60 8 Science Classrooms 15 5 5 25 25 Land Acquisition 2 6 8 7 1 portables 1 1 1 10 10 3 Total 78 18 1 0 10 0 101 102 12 1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2019 bond monies, and previously collected school impact fees. 3. Unsecured funds include future school impact fees and potential bond initiatives. *2022-23 and prior AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 21 County, King County Code 21A was adopted, establishing an impact fee formula that has in turn been adopted by the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton, in their respective enabling ordinances. The formula requires that school districts establish “Student Generation Factors” that estimate the number of students generated by each new single or multi-family residential unit constructed and establish district-specific construction costs that are unique to that district. Refer to appendices for substantiating documentation on Student Generation Factors. Other factors influencing impact fees include: Site Acquisition Costs - the estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Acquisition Cost - the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the district. Temporary Facility Cost - the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom, including site work and utilities. State Funding Assistance Credit - the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. Tax Credit – Driven by assessed property values, taxation rate, and Bond interest rates effective effective IMPACT FEES January January CHANGE 2024 2025 SINGLE-FAMILY $2,161 $1,003 ($1,158) MULTI-FAMILY $4,257 $3,268 ($989) AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 22 II. APPENDICES AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 23 RSD BOUNDARY MAP - MUNICIPALITY OVERLAY AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 24 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS:Student/Teacher Ratios: Grades K - 1 20:1 Grade 2 22:1 Grade 3 24:1 Grades 4 - 5 29:1 Scheduling Efficiciency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTAL SCHOOL TOTAL K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP TOTAL K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP CAP BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 HONEY DEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 MAPLEWOOD HGTS.26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 SARTORI 32 8 4 4 6 3 7 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554 SIERRA HGTS.29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 HILLTOP HERITIAGE 32 6 4 4 6 4 8 650 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 650 TOTAL 430 115 52 50 69 36 124 7,545 65 0 0 13 32 1 19 1,252 8,797 TABLE 11 LINDBERGH SERVICE PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTAL AREA TOTAL K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP TOTAL K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP CAP BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 TOTAL 122 30 13 9 21 11 38 1,843 10 0 0 4 3 0 3 183 2,026 HAZEN PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTAL SERVICE AREA TOTAL K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP TOTAL K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP CAP HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HONEY DEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 MAPLEWOOD HGTS.26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 SIERRA HGTS.29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TOTAL 110 27 16 14 12 8 25 1,832 28 0 0 4 18 0 6 618 2,450 RENTON HIGH PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTAL SERVICE AREA TOTAL K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP TOTAL K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP CAP BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TOTAL 109 28 12 14 17 7 31 1,737 19 0 0 5 6 1 7 306 2,043 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS:Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 PE 35:1 Band /Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 Scheduling Efficiciency 0.83 Program Efficiency 0.95 PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLES TOTAL SCHOOL TOTAL CORE PE BAND CHOIR SPED OTHER SUPP CAP TOTAL CORE SPED SUPP CAP CAP DIMMIT 41 21 3 1 1 4 5 6 794 4 4 0 0 91 885 McKNIGHT 41 25 3 1 1 4 5 2 847 8 8 0 0 183 1,030 NELSEN 52 22 3 1 1 2 9 14 896 8 8 0 0 183 1,079 RISDON 47 24 3 2 1 7 4 6 898 0 0 0 0 0 898 TOTAL 181 92 12 5 4 17 23 28 3,435 20 20 0 0 457 3,892 TABLE 12A HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS:Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 (24:1 @ Talley) PE 40:1 Band /Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 (24:1 @ Talley) Scheduling Efficiciency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.90 PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLES TOTAL SCHOOL TOTAL CORE PE BAND CHOIR SPED OTHER SUPP CAP TOTAL CORE SPED SUPP CAP CAP HAZEN 78 44 3 2 1 7 18 3 1,462 0 0 0 0 0 1,462 LINDBERGH 55 32 3 1 1 6 11 1 1,211 5 4 1 0 92 1,303 RENTON 68 34 3 1 1 7 16 6 1,389 0 0 0 0 0 1,389 TALLEY 24 13 1 0 0 1 6 3 397 0 0 0 0 0 397 TOTAL 225 123 10 4 3 21 51 13 4,458 5 4 1 0 92 4,550 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 26 STUDENT GENERATION RATES (SGR) The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, requires that school districts provide “student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation.” The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, “data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county-wide averages must be used.” In years past, the district used average SGR’S from nearby districts. Starting with the 2021 CFP, the district began using its own SGR derived from residential projects with the district. The district used those SGR’s again for the 2022 CFP - due to paused construction and covid impacts on enrollment. Student generation rates were updated in 2023 and are also being used for 2024 calculations. There was not a significant difference in student generation rates from 2021 generated rates. The multi-family rate is higher at 28 per one hundred vs. 24 per one hundred. This slightly higher rate is likely due to presence of more low-income units and units with multiple bedrooms. STUDENT GENERATION RATES Elementary Middle School High School (K-5) (6-8) (9-12) Total SINGLE-FAMILY 0.146 0.046 0.089 0.281 MULTI-FAMILY 0.146 0.065 0.069 0.280 The student generation rate varies among apartment developments, based on whether the units are for low-income residents and based on the number of bedrooms in each unit. These differences can help the district when planning for future growth from housing. AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 27 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 28 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 29 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 30 AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 31 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATION SITE ACQUISITION COST Site Area Facility SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILYFacilityCost per Acre(Acres)Capacity SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 10 $ 650,000.00 650 0.146 $1,460 0.146 $1,460.00 Middle 0 650 850 0.046 $0 0.065 $0.00 High 0 650 1250 0.089 $0 0.069 $0.00 TOTAL $1,460 TOTAL $1,460 SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST Perm. % of Facility Cost Facility in in MULTI-FAMILYFacilityTot. Facilities (2022 $)Capacity SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 85.77% 58,000,000 650 0.146 $11,174 0.146 $11,174 Middle 88.25%0 850 0.046 $0 0.065 $0 High 97.97%0 1,250 0.089 $0 0.069 $0 TOTAL $11,174 TOTAL $11,174 TEMPORARY FACILITY COST Perm. % of Facility Cost Facility SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILYFacilityTot. Facilities (2022 $)Capacity SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 14.23%0 29 0.146 $0 0.146 $0 Middle 11.75%0 26 0.046 $0 0.065 $0 High 2.03%0 26 0.089 $0 0.069 $0 TOTAL $0 TOTAL $0 OSPI SCAP Cost Alloc. Sq. Ft. per Assistance SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILYFacilityper Sq. Ft. Student Percentage SGF COST SGF COST Elementary $ 375.00 90 0.3615 0.146 ($1,781) 0.146 ($1,781) Middle $ 375.00 117 0.3133 0.046 $0 0.065 $0 High $ 375.00 130 0.3133 0.089 $0 0.069 $0 TOTAL ($1,781)TOTAL ($1,781) TAX CREDIT (TC) *SINGLE-FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY Average Assessed Value (AAV)$673,008 $328,428 Interest Rate for Bonds ( i )3.48%3.48% Term (t = maximum 10 yrs.)10 10 Tax Rate ( r ) 0.001579 0.001579 TC TOTAL TC TOTAL ($8,847)($4,317) FACILITY CREDIT $0 $0 TOTAL FEE $2,005 $6,535 50% DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION 1,003 3,268 IMPACT FEE 1,003 3,268 TABLE 11 ((1+i)t - 1)* TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where NPV = i (1 +i)t AAV =Average assessed Value r = Tax Rate i =Bond Interest Rate as of 03/2024 t = Bond Term AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 32 CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN PERMANENT FACILITY CAPACITY (Students) 2022/23 2023/2024 CHANGE Elementary 6,895 7,545 650 Middle 3,435 3,435 0 High 4,458 4,458 0 Total 14,788 15,438 650 STUDENT ENROLLMENT (October Headcount) 2022/2023 2023/2024*CHANGE Elementary 6,732 6,550 (182) Middle 3,301 3,094 (207) High 4,348 4,481 133 Total 14,381 14,125 (256) IMPACT FEES Jan 1, 2024 Jan 1, 2025 CHANGE Single-Family $ 2,161.00 $ 1,003.00 $ (1,158.00) Multi-Family $ 4,257.00 $ 3,268.00 $ (989.00) STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS 2023 2024 CHANGE Single-Family Elementary 0.146 0.146 0.000 Middle 0.046 0.046 0.000 High 0.089 0.089 0.000 Total 0.281 0.281 0.000 Multi-Family Elementary 0.146 0.146 0.000 Middle 0.065 0.065 0.000 High 0.069 0.069 0.000 Total 0.280 0.280 0.000 ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEE FACTORS 2023 2024 CHANGE Land Acquisition per Acre $ 650,000.00 $ 650,000.00 0 Temp. Building Acquisition $ 177,000.00 $ 177,000.00 0 State Match Percentage 0.3615 0.3615 0.0000 Ave. Taxed Value - Single $ 769,979.00 $ 673,008.00 $ (96,971.00) Ave. Taxed Value - Multi $ 308,241.00 $ 328,428.00 $ 20,187.00 Bond Interest Rate 3.58% 3.48% -0.10% Tax Rate per $1000 1.37460 1.57900 0.20440 Construction Cost Allocation $ 246.83 $ 375.00 $ 128.17 *includes HOME & Academy in high numbers AGENDA ITEM #6. b) Page | 1 July 29, 2024 City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: 2025 Rate Schedule, Capital Facilities Plan, and Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees Distinguished Mayor Pavone, I am writing to inform you that the Renton Regional Fire Authority (RRFA) will not be making any changes to the Capital Facilities Plan, Fire Impact Fee Rate Study, or the Fire Marshal's Office Fees for 2025. Our preliminary analysis has shown that there have not been any substantial changes that would warrant an increase in fees since last year. After a review of our current operations, resources, and community needs, we have determined that the existing plans and fee structures remain adequate to meet our operational requirements and ensure the continued safety and well-being of Renton's residents and businesses. The lack of significant changes in our operating environment since 2023 or projected demands in 2025 supports maintaining the current fee schedule without adjustments. Our ongoing commitment is to serve the residents and businesses of Renton efficiently, responsively, and with the highest standard of safety. We believe that maintaining the existing fee structures will continue to provide the necessary funding to support our services without placing additional financial burdens on our community. We value our collaborative relationship with the City of Renton and appreciate the efforts of the City staff members in Transportation and Community and Economic Development who work closely with us to ensure our projections align with those of the City. The Renton Regional Fire Authority remains dedicated to serving in partnership with the City of Renton, and we look forward to continuing our joint efforts to safeguard and enhance our community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or require further information. Respectfully, Steve Heitman Fire Chief Steven C Heitman (Jul 29, 2024 14:36 PDT) Steven C Heitman AGENDA ITEM #6. b) AB - 3651 City Council Regular Meeting - 16 Sep 2024 SUBJECT/TITLE: Contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates for A&E Master Professional Services at the Renton Municipal Airport RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee DEPARTMENT: Public Works Airport STAFF CONTACT: William Adams, Civil Engineer EXT.: 7473 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: The fiscal impact of the contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates for Architect & Engineering (A&E) Master Professional Services from October 2024 to December 2027 is not to exceed $250,000. The full cost of this contract will be funded by the Airport 422.725088 account. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Airport is seeking A&E Master Professional services over the next 3 years to support various development projects around the airport. Having a professional Engineering and Architecture firm under contract will allow the airport to more rapidly assess issues with infrastructure and devise solutions in a more expedient manner. Currently, minor work or issues of immediate concern are not addressed until a firm is solicited and placed under contract. The contract award allows the airport to utilize Kimley-Horn and Associates for such work without delay. Kimley-Horn and Associates was selected as an awardee after the city solicited qualification for on-call engineering firms and reviewed the submittals from 4 firms. After a review of their qualifications and experience, staff determined that Kimley-Horn and Associates was tied for most qualified with another firm which staff will be bringing forward under a separate agenda bill. EXHIBITS: A. Agreement STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates for A&E Master Professional Services from October 2024 to December 2027 with a not to exceed amount of $250,000. AGENDA ITEM #6. c) MASTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES AS-NEEDED THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference purposes only as August 30, 2024, is by and between the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (“Consultant”), a North Carolina corporation. The City and the Consultant are referred to collectively in this Agreement as the “Parties.” Once fully executed by the Parties, this Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by both parties. 1. Scope of Work: Consultant agrees to provide non-exclusive on-call supporting engineering services as specified in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated herein and may hereinafter be referred to as the “Work.” Specific projects which will constitute the Work will be assigned using an ON-CALL TASK ADDENDUM as set forth in Exhibit C, which is attached and incorporated herein. 2. Changes in Scope of Work: The City, without invalidating this Agreement, may order changes to the Work consisting of additions, deletions or modifications. Any such changes to the Work shall be ordered by the City in writing and the Compensation shall be equitably adjusted consistent with the rates set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached and incorporated herein, or as otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties. 3. Time of Performance: Consultant shall commence performance of the Agreement no later than 30 calendar days after the Agreement’s Effective Date. All Work shall be commenced by no later than December 31, 2027. 4. Compensation: A. Amount. Total compensation to Consultant for Work provided for all ON-CALL TASK ADDENDUMs cumulatively pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed $250,000, plus any applicable state and local sales taxes. Compensation shall be paid as a flat rate fixed sum based upon Work actually performed according to the rate(s) or amounts specified in Exhibit B. The Work to be ordered as needed per individual ON- CALL TASK ADDENDUMs, and there is no guaranteed minimum amount to be paid under this Agreement. The Consultant agrees that any hourly or flat rate charged by it for its Work shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) unless otherwise agreed to in writing or provided in Exhibit B. Except as specifically provided herein, the AGENDA ITEM #6. c) PAGE 2 OF 10 Consultant shall be solely responsible for payment of any taxes imposed as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement. B. Method of Payment. For each ON-CALL TASK ADDENDUM on a monthly or no less than quarterly basis during any quarter in which Work is performed, the Consultant shall submit a voucher or invoice in a form specified by the City, including a description of what Work has been performed, the name of the personnel performing such Work, and any hourly labor charge rate for such personnel. The Consultant shall also submit a final bill upon completion of all Work. Payment shall be made by the City for Work performed within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the voucher or invoice. If the Consultant’s performance does not meet the requirements of this Agreement, the Consultant will correct or modify its performance to comply with the Agreement. The City may withhold payment for work that does not meet the requirements of this Agreement. C. Effect of Payment. Payment for any part of the Work shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies it may have against the Consultant for failure of the Consultant to perform the Work or for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. D. Non-Appropriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City shall not be obligated to make payments for Work or amounts incurred after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all remaining Work for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall accrue to the City in the event this provision applies. 5. Termination: A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause by giving ten (10) calendar days’ notice to the Consultant in writing. In the event of such termination or suspension, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, worksheets, models and reports, or other material prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to the City, if any are required as part of the Work. B. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City, the Consultant shall be entitled to payment for all hours worked to the effective date of termination, less all payments previously made. If the Agreement is terminated by the City after partial performance of Work for which the agreed compensation is a fixed fee, the City shall pay the Consultant an equitable share of the fixed fee. This provision shall not prevent the City from seeking any legal remedies it may have for the violation or nonperformance of any of the provisions of this Agreement and such charges due to the City shall be AGENDA ITEM #6. c) PAGE 3 OF 10 deducted from the final payment due the Consultant. No payment shall be made by the City for any expenses incurred or work done following the effective date of termination unless authorized in advance in writing by the City. 6. Representations And Right To Use Work Product: Consultant will perform all Work identified in this Agreement in a professional and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all reasonable and professional standards and laws for the type of work provided in Washington state. Compliance with professional standards includes, as applicable, performing the Work in compliance with applicable City standards or guidelines (e.g. design criteria and Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction). Professional engineers shall certify engineering plans, specifications, plats, and reports, as applicable, pursuant to RCW 18.43.070. All final work product created for and delivered to the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be the original work of the Consultant and free from any intellectual property encumbrance which would restrict the City from using the work product. Consultant grants to the City a non-exclusive, perpetual right and license to use, reproduce, distribute, adapt, modify, and display all final work product produced pursuant to this Agreement. The City’s or other’s adaptation, modification or use of the final work products other than for the purposes of this Agreement shall be without liability to the Consultant. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 7. Record Maintenance: The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and Work provided in the performance of this Agreement and retain such records for as long as may be required by applicable Washington State records retention laws, but in any event no less than six years after the termination of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access to and copies of any records related to this Agreement as required by the City to audit expenditures and charges and/or to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act (Chapter 42.56 RCW). The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Public Records Compliance: To the full extent the City determines necessary to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act, Consultant shall make a due diligent search of all records in its possession or control relating to this Agreement and the Work, including, but not limited to, e-mail, correspondence, notes, saved telephone messages, recordings, photos, or drawings and provide them to the City for production. In the event Consultant believes said records need to be protected from disclosure, it may, at Consultant’s own expense, seek judicial protection. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for all costs, including attorneys’ fees, attendant to any claim or litigation related to a Public Records Act request for which Consultant has responsive records and for which Consultant has withheld records or information contained therein, or not provided them to the City in a timely manner. Consultant shall produce for AGENDA ITEM #6. c) PAGE 4 OF 10 distribution any and all records responsive to the Public Records Act request in a timely manner, unless those records are protected by court order. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 9. Independent Contractor Relationship: A. The Consultant is retained by the City only for the purposes and to the extent set forth in this Agreement. The nature of the relationship between the Consultant and the City during the period of the Work shall be that of an independent contractor, not employee. The Consultant, not the City, shall have the power to control and direct the details, manner or means of Work. Specifically, but not by means of limitation, the Consultant shall have no obligation to work any particular hours or particular schedule, unless otherwise indicated in the Scope of Work or where scheduling of attendance or performance is mutually arranged due to the nature of the Work. Consultant shall retain the right to designate the means of performing the Work covered by this agreement, and the Consultant shall be entitled to employ other workers at such compensation and such other conditions as it may deem proper, provided, however, that any contract so made by the Consultant is to be paid by it alone, and that employing such workers, it is acting individually and not as an agent for the City. B. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or Social Security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance Program, or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to Consultant or any employee of the Consultant. C. If the Consultant is a sole proprietorship or if this Agreement is with an individual, the Consultant agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Consultant retired under a State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any losses the City may sustain through the Consultant’s failure to do so. 10. Hold Harmless: The Consultant agrees to release, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, employees, officers, representatives, and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, taxes, losses, fines, fees, penalties, expenses, attorney’s or attorneys' fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and all persons or entities, arising from, resulting from, or related to the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in its performance of this Agreement or a breach of this Agreement by Consultant, except for that portion of the claims caused by the City's negligence. Consultant’s defense obligations under this indemnity paragraph means only the reimbursement of reasonable defense costs to the proportionate extent of Consultant’s actual liability obligation hereunder. AGENDA ITEM #6. c) PAGE 5 OF 10 Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, (Validity of agreement to indemnify against liability for negligence relative to construction, alteration, improvement, etc., of structure or improvement attached to real estate…) then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, Consultant’s liability shall be only to the extent of Consultant’s negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided in this Agreement constitute Consultant’s waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. The Parties have mutually negotiated and agreed to this waiver. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 11. Gifts and Conflicts: The City’s Code of Ethics and Washington State law prohibit City employees from soliciting, accepting, or receiving any gift, gratuity or favor from any person, firm or corporation involved in a contract or transaction. To ensure compliance with the City’s Code of Ethics and state law, the Consultant shall not give a gift of any kind to City employees or officials. Consultant also confirms that Consultant does not have a business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was, is, or will be involved in selecting the Consultant, negotiating or administering this Agreement, or evaluating the Consultant’s performance of the Work. 12. City of Renton Business License: The Consultant shall obtain a City of Renton Business License prior to performing any Work and maintain the business license in good standing throughout the term of this agreement with the City. Information regarding acquiring a city business license can be found at: http://www.rentonwa.gov/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7922741&pageId=9824882 Information regarding State business licensing requirements can be found at: http://dor.wa.gov/doing-business/register-my-business 13. Insurance: Consultant shall secure and maintain: A. Commercial general liability insurance in the minimum amounts of $1,000,000 for each occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the Term of this Agreement. B. In the event that Work delivered pursuant to this Agreement either directly or indirectly involve or require Professional Services, Professional Liability, Errors and Omissions coverage shall be provided with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per claim. "Professional Services", for the purpose of this section, shall mean any Work provided by a licensed professional or Work that requires a professional standard of care. AGENDA ITEM #6. c) PAGE 6 OF 10 C. Workers’ compensation coverage, as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington, shall also be secured. D. Commercial Automobile Liability for owned, leased, hired or non-owned, leased, hired or non-owned, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit, if there will be any use of Consultant’s vehicles on the City’s Premises by or on behalf of the City, beyond normal commutes. E. Consultant shall name the City as an Additional Insured on its commercial general liability policy on a non-contributory primary basis. The City’s insurance policies shall not be a source for payment of any Consultant liability, nor shall the maintenance of any insurance required by this Agreement be construed to limit the liability of Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance or otherwise limit the City’s recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. F. Subject to the City’s review and acceptance, a certificate of insurance showing the proper endorsements, shall be delivered to the City before performing the Work. G. Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice. 14. Delays: Consultant is not responsible for delays caused by factors beyond the Consultant’s reasonable control. When such delays beyond the Consultant’s reasonable control occur, the City agrees the Consultant is not responsible for damages, nor shall the Consultant be deemed to be in default of the Agreement. 15. Successors and Assigns: Neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, transfer or encumber any rights, duties or interests accruing from this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 16. Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party at the address which appears below (as modified in writing from time to time by such party), and given personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, by facsimile or by nationally recognized overnight courier service. Time period for notices shall be deemed to have commenced upon the date of receipt, EXCEPT facsimile delivery will be deemed to have commenced on the first business day following transmission. Email and telephone may be used for purposes of administering the Agreement, but should not be used to give any formal notice required by the Agreement. AGENDA ITEM #6. c) PAGE 7 OF 10 CITY OF RENTON William Adams, PE 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Phone: (206) 775-6862 wadams@rentonwa.gov CONSULTANT David Williams PE 1201 3rd Ave #2800 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: 206-413-6563 david.williams@kimley-horn.com 17. Discrimination Prohibited: Except to the extent permitted by a bona fide occupational qualification, the Consultant agrees as follows: A. Consultant, and Consultant’s agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers with regard to the Work performed or to be performed under this Agreement, shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital status, sexual orientation or preference, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification in relationship to hiring and employment, in employment or application for employment, the administration of the delivery of Work or any other benefits under this Agreement, or procurement of materials or supplies. B. The Consultant will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation, physical, sensory or mental handicaps, or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training. C. If the Consultant fails to comply with any of this Agreement’s non-discrimination provisions, the City shall have the right, at its option, to cancel the Agreement in whole or in part. D. The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal, state and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion of the project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws, worker's compensation, and Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, and will comply with City of Renton Council Resolution Number 4085. 18. Miscellaneous: The parties hereby acknowledge: A. The City is not responsible to train or provide training for Consultant. AGENDA ITEM #6. c) PAGE 8 OF 10 B. Consultant will not be reimbursed for job related expenses except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits. C. Consultant shall furnish all tools and/or materials necessary to perform the Work except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits. D. In the event special training, licensing, or certification is required for Consultant to provide Work he/she will acquire or maintain such at his/her own expense and, if Consultant employs, sub-contracts, or otherwise assigns the responsibility to perform the Work, said employee/sub-contractor/assignee will acquire and or maintain such training, licensing, or certification. E. This is a non-exclusive agreement and Consultant is free to provide his/her Work to other entities, so long as there is no interruption or interference with the provision of Work called for in this Agreement. F. Consultant is responsible for his/her own insurance, including, but not limited to health insurance. G. Consultant is responsible for his/her own Worker’s Compensation coverage as well as that for any persons employed by the Consultant. 19. Other Provisions: A. Approval Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City and Consultant represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the City or Consultant. B. General Administration and Management. The City’s project manager is William Adams. In providing Work, Consultant shall coordinate with the City’s contract manager or his/her designee. C. Amendment and Modification. This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing, duly executed by both Parties. D. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Any exhibits/attachments to this Agreement are incorporated by reference only to the extent of the purpose for which they are referenced within this Agreement. To the extent a Consultant prepared exhibit conflicts with the terms in the body of this Agreement or contains terms that are extraneous to the purpose for which it is referenced, the terms in the body of this Agreement shall prevail and the extraneous terms shall not be incorporated herein. AGENDA ITEM #6. c) PAGE 9 OF 10 E. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the City of Renton. Consultant and all of the Consultant’s employees shall perform the Work in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances. F. Joint Drafting Effort. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as prepared by the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed against one party or the other as a result of the preparation, substitution, submission or other event of negotiation, drafting or execution. G. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any lawsuit or legal action brought by any party to enforce or interpret this Agreement or any of its terms or covenants shall be brought in the King County Superior Court for the State of Washington at the Maleng Regional Justice Center in Kent, King County, Washington, or its replacement or successor. Consultant hereby expressly consents to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction and venue of such court even if Consultant is a foreign corporation not registered with the State of Washington. H. Severability. A court of competent jurisdiction’s determination that any provision or part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. I. Sole and Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not incorporated are excluded. J. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the description of the Work is essential to the Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. K. Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than the Parties, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties and no one else. L. Binding Effect. The Parties each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of the Agreement. AGENDA ITEM #6. c) PAGE 10 OF 10 M. Waivers. All waivers shall be in writing and signed by the waiving party. Either party’s failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver and shall not prevent either the City or Consultant from enforcing that provision or any other provision of this Agreement in the future. Waiver of breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach unless it is expressly waived in writing. N. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Agreement in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Agreement as of the date last signed by the Parties below. CITY OF RENTON By:_____________________________ CONSULTANT By:____________________________ Armondo Pavone Mayor David Williams PE Project Manager _____________________________ Date Attest _____________________________ Jason A. Seth City Clerk _____________________________ Date Approved as to Legal Form By: __________________________ Alex Tuttle Senior Assistant City Attorney Contract Template Updated 9/9/2020 OOTCA contract no. 3145 AGENDA ITEM #6. c) Page 1 of 4 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AIRPORT DIVISION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES A&E ON-CALL The City of Renton’s Airport Division (Airport) is soliciting statements of qualifications for Architectural and Engineering (A&E) Professional Services for the scope of work listed below. The Airport is seeking consultants with expertise in civil design, construction management, and project management, with offices located in the State of Washington and licensed to do business in the State of Washington. Interested consultants must submit Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) as outlined below. Scope of Work The Renton Municipal Airport requires professional, technical, and advisory services as part of its Airport Capital Improvement Program. Projects may include but are not limited to: x Pavement design o Repair of various areas of pavement failure o Pavement markings x Civil engineering x Architectural design x Geotechnical exploration, analysis, and reporting x Security system upgrade design and cost estimation o Wildlife management upgrade and design x Surveying x Aircraft hangar renovation design x Existing airfield fire hydrant system analysis x Cost estimating x Grant writing x ACIP development x Long range planning x Sound study x Environmental engineering feasibility and design x Airspace/sighting study review TERPS x Legal description writing x Appraisals, fee study, rent study x Redevelopment of our Airport Rules, Regulations and Leasing Policies. x Plan review x Constructability review x Administrative services x DBE program development x Project management x Small project engineering including design, construction drawings, permitting, and writing of special provisions. Such small projects may include, but are not limited to structures, drainage studies, drainage pipes and structures, airfield lighting, airfield pavement. Information to be provided in State of Qualifications (SOQ) In addition to the items listed below, submittals from consulting firms and/or individuals must include the firm name and main phone number; name and e-mail address for Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager; disciplines provided by the firm and total number of employees within Washington State. Similar information shall be provided for any sub-consultants. A Submittal Information Form must be completed and attached to the SOQ for the prime consultant and each sub-consultant (if any). Failure to include a Submittal Information Form will not be evaluated. Refer to WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines, Chapter 31, EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF WORK AGENDA ITEM #6. c) kimley-horn.com 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2800, Seattle, WA 98101 206-607-2600 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ____________________________________ 2024 Hourly Labor Rate Schedule Classification Rate Support Staff $125 Senior Support Staff $195 Analyst I $155 Analyst II $175 Professional $230 Senior Professional I $320 Senior Professional II $390 Technical Support $110 Senior Technical Support I $170 Senior Technical Support II $260 Subject to annual adjustment Internal Reimbursable Expenses will be charged at 5% of Labor Billings External Reimbursable Expenses will be charged at 15% mark-up, or per the Contract Sub-Consultants will be billed per the Contract EXHIBIT B AGENDA ITEM #6. c) kimley-horn.com 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2800, Seattle, WA 98101 206-607-2600 CBRE Valuation and Advisory Services ____________________________________ 2024 Hourly Labor Rate Schedule Name Title Rate Murray Bracket Senior Vice President $425 Tim Lovell Senior Associate $200 Katie Captener Senior Associate $200 Dianna Smith Research Associate $125 AGENDA ITEM #6. c) Last Name First Name Mckenzie Watson Zimmerman Zack Prigozhin Leon Stoops Scott Karasoulis Chelsey Wellman Dana Reimers Jake Hennig Garrett Kelkar Unmesh Daneman Ben Shenoy Rachana Patel Meghavi Wu Annabelle Poole Sadie Durett Marie Lappe Ashley Payton Ross Johnson Chris OConnor Keith Santana Otoole Michael Efrussy Joel Ciarletti Emiliano Steiner Mike Gee-DiFurio Ginger Brown Linda Hall Michael Loring Grant Tooler Scott Proposed Job Title Architect Project Architect Project Architect Project Architect Project Architect Project Architect Project Architect Project Architect Project Designer Project Specialist Project Specialist Project Specialist Interior Design Interior Design Interior Design Project Manager Project Specialist Principal Principal / Technical Director Senior Aviation Planner / Associate Aviation Planner Design Director - Architecture Project Manager Project Manager Design Director - Interior Design Senior Specifier Senior Specifier Senior Specifier Senior Specifier Proposed Fully Burdened Hourly Rate $160.00 $180.00 $180.00 $180.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $160.00 $125.00 $125.00 $140.00 $165.00 $165.00 $200.00 $130.00 $380.00 $340.00 $300.00 $160.00 $300.00 $315.00 $220.00 $290.00 $220.00 $220.00 $220.00 $240.00 AG E N D A I T E M # 6 . c ) Subconsultant: Furtado & Associates, Inc. Max Direct Overhead @ Profit @ Max Rate Position Classification Salary Rate 165.60%30.00%Per Hour President $158.34 $262.21 $47.50 $468.05 Senior Vice President $141.96 $235.09 $42.59 $419.64 Vice President $131.04 $217.00 $39.31 $387.35 Principal $109.20 $180.84 $32.76 $322.80 Senior Principal $141.96 $235.09 $42.59 $419.64 Department Manager $87.36 $144.67 $26.21 $258.24 Land Surveyor, LSIT $57.20 $94.72 $17.16 $169.08 Survey Manager I $65.52 $108.50 $19.66 $193.68 Survey Manager II $87.36 $144.67 $26.21 $258.24 Survey Manager III $105.92 $175.40 $31.78 $313.10 Civil CAD Manager $76.44 $126.58 $22.93 $225.95 Deputy Project Manager $65.52 $108.50 $19.66 $193.68 Project Manager I $62.40 $103.33 $18.72 $184.45 Project Manager II $67.60 $111.95 $20.28 $199.83 Project Manager III $83.20 $137.78 $24.96 $245.94 Senior Project Manager $131.04 $217.00 $39.31 $387.35 Surveyor I $28.39 $47.01 $8.52 $83.92 Surveyor II $34.94 $57.86 $10.48 $103.28 Surveyor III $38.22 $63.29 $11.47 $112.98 Field Team Lead $49.14 $81.38 $14.74 $145.26 Field Team Lead, Senior $60.06 $99.46 $18.02 $177.54 Field Team Lead, Senior Managing $70.98 $117.54 $21.29 $209.81 Senior Survey Technician $65.52 $108.50 $19.66 $193.68 GIS Technician I $30.16 $49.94 $9.05 $89.15 GIS Technician II $35.36 $58.56 $10.61 $104.53 GIS Technician III $40.56 $67.17 $12.17 $119.90 GIS Technician IV $45.76 $75.78 $13.73 $135.27 GIS Technician V $50.96 $84.39 $15.29 $150.64 GIS Technician VI $56.16 $93.00 $16.85 $166.01 GIS Technician VII $60.32 $99.89 $18.10 $178.31 Engineering Technician I $28.39 $47.01 $8.52 $83.92 Engineering Technician II $32.76 $54.25 $9.83 $96.84 Engineering Technician III $38.22 $63.29 $11.47 $112.98 Engineering Technician IV $43.68 $72.33 $13.10 $129.11 Engineering Technician V $49.14 $81.38 $14.74 $145.26 Engineering Technician VI $54.60 $90.42 $16.38 $161.40 Engineering Technician VII $60.06 $99.46 $18.02 $177.54 Engineering Technician VIII $65.52 $108.50 $19.66 $193.68 Engineering Technician IX $70.98 $117.54 $21.29 $209.81 Civil Engineer I $48.05 $79.57 $14.42 $142.04 Civil Engineer II $70.98 $117.54 $21.29 $209.81 Civil Engineer III $87.36 $144.67 $26.21 $258.24 Project Engineer $88.40 $146.39 $26.52 $261.31 Engineering Department Manager $92.82 $153.71 $27.85 $274.38 Document Control Specialist I $54.60 $90.42 $16.38 $161.40 Document Control Specialist II $76.44 $126.58 $22.93 $225.95 Construction Inspector I $54.60 $90.42 $16.38 $161.40 Construction Inspector II $81.90 $135.63 $24.57 $242.10 Construction Inspector III $98.28 $162.75 $29.48 $290.51 Construction Manager I $70.98 $117.54 $21.29 $209.81 Construction Manager II $87.36 $144.67 $26.21 $258.24 Construction Manager III $109.20 $180.84 $32.76 $322.80 Project/Office Administrator I $32.76 $54.25 $9.83 $96.84 Project/Office Administrator II $49.14 $81.38 $14.74 $145.26 Senior Project/Office Administrator $65.52 $108.50 $19.66 $193.68 HR/Office Manager $49.14 $81.38 $14.74 $145.26 Controller $81.36 $134.73 $24.41 $240.50 City of Renton 2024 Rate Schedule A&E On-Call Professional Services - Renton Municipal Airport AGENDA ITEM #6. c) FEE SCHEDULE FOR ENGINEERING & RELATED SERVICES CENTURY WEST ENGINEERING CORPORATION EXHIBIT "B" EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2024 (This schedule is subject to change) The compensation for work done on the basis of personnel services plus incurred expenses will be established using the rates as set forth below: A. PERSONNEL SERVICES The following rates and classifications shall be in effect through 12/31/2024 for this contract. For multi-year contracts, the rates will be increased and updated on an annual basis beginning January 1, 2025: Civil Engineering Services Electrical Engineering Services 120 Receptionist $82.00 109 Senior CAD Technician $140.00 117 Project Coordinator/Clerical I $97.00 161 Designer $125.00 118 Project Coordinator/Clerical II $120.00 103 Project Manager $200.00 153 Graphic Designer $140.00 147 Staff Technician $102.00 142 Senior Technician $140.00 109 Senior CAD Technician $140.00 133 Civil Designer $152.00 181 Engineering Intern $75.00 188 Engineer-in-Training I $105.00 195 Engineer-in-Training II $120.00 187 Engineer-in-Training III $135.00 106 Project Engineer $155.00 104 Senior Project Engineer $180.00 114 Staff Airport Planner $92.00 112 Senior Airport Planner $195.00 198 Senior Airport Planner II $227.00 103 Project Manager $190.00 165 Project Manager II $205.00 102 Senior Project Manager $220.00 185 Senior Project Manager II $245.00 184 Senior Project Manager III $305.00 163 Vice President $315.00 101 Principal $325.00 B. OUTSIDE EXPENSES Any outside expenses including subconsultant and subcontractor services incurred for this project by Century West Engineering will be charged at 110% of the actual cost of the expense. C. IN-HOUSE EXPENSES 1. Equipment Expenses: Vehicle Mileage Current IRS Rate Nuclear Density Gauge 50.00/day 150.00/wk 550.00/mo 2. Drafting Supplies and Reproduction Costs: Drafting supplies and reproduction materials provided from stock will be charged at the following rates: Plot 4.00/sheet Photocopy .05/copy AGENDA ITEM #6. c) NTE TITLE HOURLY Overhead Fixed Fee Billing RATE 1.8724 30.00%Rate Administrative Support $35.00 $65.53 $10.50 $111.04 CAD $45.00 $84.26 $13.50 $142.77 Contracts Administrator $50.00 $93.62 $15.00 $158.63 Geologist I $30.00 $56.17 $9.00 $95.18 Geologist II $37.00 $69.28 $11.10 $117.39 Geologist III $45.00 $84.26 $13.50 $142.77 Geologist IV $53.00 $99.24 $15.90 $168.15 Geologist V $55.00 $102.98 $16.50 $174.49 Geologist VI $63.00 $117.96 $18.90 $199.87 Geologist VII $70.00 $131.07 $21.00 $222.08 Geologist VIII $90.00 $168.52 $27.00 $285.53 Geotechnical Engineer I $40.00 $74.90 $12.00 $126.91 Geotechnical Engineer II $47.00 $88.00 $14.10 $149.11 Geotechnical Engineer III $50.00 $93.62 $15.00 $158.63 Geotechnical Engineer IV $55.00 $102.98 $16.50 $174.49 Geotechnical Engineer V $63.00 $117.96 $18.90 $199.87 Geotechnical Engineer VI $72.00 $134.81 $21.60 $228.42 Geotechnical Engineer VII $86.00 $161.03 $25.80 $272.84 Geotechnical Engineer VIII $94.00 $176.01 $28.20 $298.22 Hydrogeologist IV $56.00 $104.85 $16.80 $177.66 Hydrogeologist V $60.00 $112.34 $18.00 $190.35 Lab/Field Technician I $25.00 $46.81 $7.50 $79.32 Lab/Field Technician II $29.00 $54.30 $8.70 $92.01 Lab/Field Technician III $35.00 $65.53 $10.50 $111.04 Lab/Field Technician IV $46.00 $86.13 $13.80 $145.94 Lab/Field Technician V $50.00 $93.62 $15.00 $158.63 Principal IX $110.00 $205.96 $33.00 $348.97 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. 2024 ANTE HOURLY RATES BY CATEGORY AGENDA ITEM #6. c) Exhibit C ‐ CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Page 1 of 3 Exhibit C CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. City of Renton On‐Call Supporting Engineering Services This ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. is made and entered in to on , 2024, between the City of Renton, (City) and Kimley‐Horn and Associates, Inc. (Consultant) collectively (Parties) pursuant to and in compliance with the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ON‐ CALL SUPPORTING ENGINEERING SERVICES CAG‐24‐___ dated , 2024 (Agreement) following RFQ/SOQ and negotiation in compliance with chapter 39.80 RCW. The Parties agree as follows: Each and every provision of the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ON‐CALL SUPPORTING ENGINEERING SERVICES CAG‐24‐___ dated , 2024 shall remain in full force and effect, and the scope of CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. is as follows: 1. Project Name: 2. City Division: City Project Manager or Contact for Task Addendum: (Name, address, email, phone) 3. Scope of Services is as follows (Or as set forth in CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 1. ) 4. Technical Approach (if necessary) Additional specifications and requirements may be attached to this form or as set forth in CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 2. 5. Deliverables (Or as set forth in CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 3) 6. Schedule (Or as set forth in CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 4.) 7. Cost/Hour Estimates AGENDA ITEM #6. c) Exhibit C ‐ CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Page 2 of 3 Contractor agrees to perform the services as described above for the amount not to exceed $ unless modified by the City in a signed written subsequent CAG‐24‐___ ON‐ CALL TASK ADDENDUM. 8. Due Date or Completion Date: 9. Total Amount Payable to the Consultant under the Master On‐Call Agreement is summarized as follows: Original Non‐Exclusive MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ON‐CALL SUPPORTING ENGINEERING SERVICES CAG‐24‐___ dated , 2024 authorized amount not to exceed per the duration of the Agreement: $______________ CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. 1 $ (LIST all OTHER CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. as they are implemented.) Grand total of CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM $ Balance remaining under MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ON‐CALL SUPPOORTING ENGINEERING SERVICES CAG‐24‐___ $ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM t as of the date last signed by the Parties below. CITY OF RENTON By: CONSULTANT By: Name: ____________________ Name: __________________ Title: _____________________ Title: ____________________ Date Date AGENDA ITEM #6. c) Exhibit C ‐ CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Page 3 of 3 (Task Addendum Exhibit Headings if needed) CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 1. Task Scope of Services CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 2. Additional specifications and requirements CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 3 Deliverables CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 4. Schedule CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 5 Cost/Hour Estimates AGENDA ITEM #6. c) AB - 3658 City Council Regular Meeting - 16 Sep 2024 SUBJECT/TITLE: Contract with DOWL for A&E Master Professional Services at the Renton Municipal Airport RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee DEPARTMENT: Public Works Airport STAFF CONTACT: William Adams, Civil Engineer EXT.: 7473 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: The fiscal impact of the contract with DOWL for Master Professional Services from October 2024 through December 2027 is not to exceed $250,000. The full cost of this contract will be funded by the approved 2024 Airport Capital Improvement Program Major Facility Maintenance account 422.725088. The current remaining 2024 budget in the account is $401,590. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Airport is seeking A&E Master Professional services over the next 3 years to support various development projects around the airport. Having a firm under contract will allow the airport to more rapidly assess issues with infrastructure and devise solutions in a more expedient manner. Currently, minor work or issues of immediate concern are not addressed until a firm is solicited and placed under contract. The contract award allows the airport to utilize DOWL for such work without delay. DOWL was selected as an awardee after the city solicited qualification for on-call engineering firms and reviewed the submittals from 4 firms, of which staff determined that DOWL was tied for most qualified with another firm. The airport will also seek to award the other most qualified firm for this work in separate agenda bill. EXHIBITS: A. Agreement STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute contract with DOWL, LLC for A&E Master Professional Services from October 2024 through December 2027 in an amount not to exceed $250,000. AGENDA ITEM #6. d) MASTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES AS-NEEDED THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference purposes only as August30, 2024, is by and between the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and DOWL, LLC (“Consultant”), a limited liability company. The City and the Consultant are referred to collectively in this Agreement as the “Parties.” Once fully executed by the Parties, this Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by both parties. 1. Scope of Work: Consultant agrees to provide non-exclusive on-call supporting engineering services as specified in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated herein and may hereinafter be referred to as the “Work.” Specific projects which will constitute the Work shall be assigned by an ON-CALL TASK ADDENDUM as set forth in Exhibit C, which is attached and incorporated herein. 2. Changes in Scope of Work: The City, without invalidating this Agreement, may order changes to the Work consisting of additions, deletions or modifications. Any such changes to the Work shall be ordered by the City in writing and the Compensation shall be equitably adjusted consistent with the rates set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached and incorporated herein, or as otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties. 3. Time of Performance: Consultant shall commence performance of the Agreement no later than 30 calendar days after the Agreement’s Effective Date. All Work shall be commenced by no later than December 31, 2027. 4. Compensation: A. Amount. Total compensation to Consultant for Work provided for all ON-CALL TASK ADDENDUMs cumulatively pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed $250,000, plus any applicable state and local sales taxes. Compensation shall be paid as a flat rate fixed sum based upon Work actually performed according to the rate(s) or amounts specified in Exhibit B. The Work to be ordered as needed per individual ON- CALL TASK ADDENDUMs, and there is no guaranteed minimum amount to be paid under this Agreement. The Consultant agrees that any hourly or flat rate charged by it for its Work shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) unless otherwise agreed to in writing or provided in Exhibit B. Except as specifically provided herein, the AGENDA ITEM #6. d) PAGE 2 OF 10 Consultant shall be solely responsible for payment of any taxes imposed as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement. B. Method of Payment. For each ON-CALL TASK ADDENDUM on a monthly or no less than quarterly basis during any quarter in which Work is performed, the Consultant shall submit a voucher or invoice in a form specified by the City, including a description of what Work has been performed, the name of the personnel performing such Work, and any hourly labor charge rate for such personnel. The Consultant shall also submit a final bill upon completion of all Work. Payment shall be made by the City for Work performed within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the voucher or invoice. If the Consultant’s performance does not meet the requirements of this Agreement, the Consultant will correct or modify its performance to comply with the Agreement. The City may withhold payment for work that does not meet the requirements of this Agreement. C. Effect of Payment. Payment for any part of the Work shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies it may have against the Consultant for failure of the Consultant to perform the Work or for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant. D. Non-Appropriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City shall not be obligated to make payments for Work or amounts incurred after the end of the current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all remaining Work for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall accrue to the City in the event this provision applies. 5. Termination: A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause by giving ten (10) calendar days’ notice to the Consultant in writing. In the event of such termination or suspension, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, worksheets, models and reports, or other material prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to the City, if any are required as part of the Work. B. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City, the Consultant shall be entitled to payment for all hours worked to the effective date of termination, less all payments previously made. If the Agreement is terminated by the City after partial performance of Work for which the agreed compensation is a fixed fee, the City shall pay the Consultant an equitable share of the fixed fee. This provision shall not prevent the City from seeking any legal remedies it may have for the violation or nonperformance of any of the provisions of this Agreement and such charges due to the City shall be AGENDA ITEM #6. d) PAGE 3 OF 10 deducted from the final payment due the Consultant. No payment shall be made by the City for any expenses incurred or work done following the effective date of termination unless authorized in advance in writing by the City. 6. Representations And Right To Use Work Product: Consultant will perform all Work identified in this Agreement in a professional manner using a degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under the same conditions by professionals practicing in the same field, at the same time and in the same or similar locality, and in accordance with all reasonable and professional standards and laws for the type of work provided in Washington state. Compliance with professional standards includes, as applicable, performing the Work in compliance with applicable City standards or guidelines (e.g. design criteria and Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction). Professional engineers shall certify engineering plans, specifications, plats, and reports, as applicable, pursuant to RCW 18.43.070. All final work product created for and delivered to the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be the original work of the Consultant and free from any intellectual property encumbrance which would restrict the City from using the work product. Consultant grants to the City a non-exclusive, perpetual right and license to use, reproduce, distribute, adapt, modify, and display all final work product produced pursuant to this Agreement. The City’s or other’s adaptation, modification or use of the final work products other than for the purposes of this Agreement shall be without liability to the Consultant. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 7. Record Maintenance: The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and Work provided in the performance of this Agreement and retain such records for as long as may be required by applicable Washington State records retention laws, but in any event no less than six years after the termination of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access to and copies of any records related to this Agreement as required by the City to audit expenditures and charges and/or to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act (Chapter 42.56 RCW). The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Public Records Compliance: To the full extent the City determines necessary to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act, Consultant shall make a due diligent search of all records in its possession or control relating to this Agreement and the Work, including, but not limited to, e-mail, correspondence, notes, saved telephone messages, recordings, photos, or drawings and provide them to the City for production. In the event Consultant believes said records need to be protected from disclosure, it may, at Consultant’s own expense, seek judicial protection. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for all costs, including attorneys’ fees, attendant to any claim or litigation related to a Public Records Act request for which Consultant has responsive AGENDA ITEM #6. d) PAGE 4 OF 10 records and for which Consultant has withheld records or information contained therein, or not provided them to the City in a timely manner. Consultant shall produce for distribution any and all records responsive to the Public Records Act request in a timely manner, unless those records are protected by court order. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 9. Independent Contractor Relationship: A. The Consultant is retained by the City only for the purposes and to the extent set forth in this Agreement. The nature of the relationship between the Consultant and the City during the period of the Work shall be that of an independent contractor, not employee. The Consultant, not the City, shall have the power to control and direct the details, manner or means of Work. Specifically, but not by means of limitation, the Consultant shall have no obligation to work any particular hours or particular schedule, unless otherwise indicated in the Scope of Work or where scheduling of attendance or performance is mutually arranged due to the nature of the Work. Consultant shall retain the right to designate the means of performing the Work covered by this agreement, and the Consultant shall be entitled to employ other workers at such compensation and such other conditions as it may deem proper, provided, however, that any contract so made by the Consultant is to be paid by it alone, and that employing such workers, it is acting individually and not as an agent for the City. B. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or Social Security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance Program, or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to Consultant or any employee of the Consultant. C. If the Consultant is a sole proprietorship or if this Agreement is with an individual, the Consultant agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Consultant retired under a State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any losses the City may sustain through the Consultant’s failure to do so. 10. Hold Harmless: The Consultant agrees to release, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, employees, officers, representatives, and volunteers from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, taxes, losses, fines, fees, penalties, expenses, attorney’s or attorneys' fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and all persons or entities, arising from, resulting from, or related to the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in its performance of this Agreement or a breach of this Agreement by Consultant, except for that portion of the claims caused by the City's negligence. Consultant’s obligations pursuant to this paragraph shall be satisfied if AGENDA ITEM #6. d) PAGE 5 OF 10 Consultant reimburses the City for all reasonable expenses incurred by the City in proportion with Consultant’s actual liability. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, (Validity of agreement to indemnify against liability for negligence relative to construction, alteration, improvement, etc., of structure or improvement attached to real estate…) then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, Consultant’s liability shall be only to the extent of Consultant’s negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided in this Agreement constitute Consultant’s waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. The Parties have mutually negotiated and agreed to this waiver. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 11. Gifts and Conflicts: The City’s Code of Ethics and Washington State law prohibit City employees from soliciting, accepting, or receiving any gift, gratuity or favor from any person, firm or corporation involved in a contract or transaction. To ensure compliance with the City’s Code of Ethics and state law, the Consultant shall not give a gift of any kind to City employees or officials. Consultant also confirms that Consultant does not have a business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was, is, or will be involved in selecting the Consultant, negotiating or administering this Agreement, or evaluating the Consultant’s performance of the Work. 12. City of Renton Business License: The Consultant shall obtain a City of Renton Business License prior to performing any Work and maintain the business license in good standing throughout the term of this agreement with the City. Information regarding acquiring a city business license can be found at: http://www.rentonwa.gov/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7922741&pageId=9824882 Information regarding State business licensing requirements can be found at: http://dor.wa.gov/doing-business/register-my-business 13. Insurance: Consultant shall secure and maintain: A. Commercial general liability insurance in the minimum amounts of $1,000,000 for each occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the Term of this Agreement. B. In the event that Work delivered pursuant to this Agreement either directly or indirectly involve or require Professional Services, Professional Liability, Errors and AGENDA ITEM #6. d) PAGE 6 OF 10 Omissions coverage shall be provided with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence. "Professional Services", for the purpose of this section, shall mean any Work provided by a licensed professional or Work that requires a professional standard of care. C. Workers’ compensation coverage, as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington, shall also be secured. D. Commercial Automobile Liability for owned, leased, hired or non-owned, leased, hired or non-owned, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit, if there will be any use of Consultant’s vehicles on the City’s Premises by or on behalf of the City, beyond normal commutes. E. Consultant shall name the City as an Additional Insured on its commercial general liability policy on a non-contributory primary basis. The City’s insurance policies shall not be a source for payment of any Consultant liability, nor shall the maintenance of any insurance required by this Agreement be construed to limit the liability of Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance or otherwise limit the City’s recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. F. Subject to the City’s review and acceptance, a certificate of insurance showing the proper endorsements, shall be delivered to the City before performing the Work. G. Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice. 14. Delays: Consultant is not responsible for delays caused by factors beyond the Consultant’s reasonable control. When such delays beyond the Consultant’s reasonable control occur, the City agrees the Consultant is not responsible for damages, nor shall the Consultant be deemed to be in default of the Agreement. 15. Successors and Assigns: Neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, transfer or encumber any rights, duties or interests accruing from this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 16. Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party at the address which appears below (as modified in writing from time to time by such party), and given personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or by nationally recognized overnight courier service. Time period for notices shall be deemed to have commenced upon the date of receipt. Email and telephone may be used for purposes of administering the Agreement, but should not be used to give any formal notice required by the Agreement. AGENDA ITEM #6. d) PAGE 7 OF 10 CITY OF RENTON William Adams, PE 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Phone: (206) 775-6862 wadams@rentonwa.gov CONSULTANT Wes Holden 8410 154th Ave NE Ste 120 Redmond, WA 98053 Phone: (425) 869-2670 wholden@dowl.com 17. Discrimination Prohibited: Except to the extent permitted by a bona fide occupational qualification, the Consultant agrees as follows: A. Consultant, and Consultant’s agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers with regard to the Work performed or to be performed under this Agreement, shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital status, sexual orientation or preference, age (except minimum age and retirement provisions), honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification in relationship to hiring and employment, in employment or application for employment, the administration of the delivery of Work or any other benefits under this Agreement, or procurement of materials or supplies. B. The Consultant will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation, physical, sensory or mental handicaps, or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training. C. If the Consultant fails to comply with any of this Agreement’s non-discrimination provisions, the City shall have the right, at its option, to cancel the Agreement in whole or in part. D. The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal, state and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion of the project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws, worker's compensation, and Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, and will comply with City of Renton Council Resolution Number 4085. 18. Miscellaneous: The parties hereby acknowledge: A. The City is not responsible to train or provide training for Consultant. AGENDA ITEM #6. d) PAGE 8 OF 10 B. Consultant will not be reimbursed for job related expenses except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits. C. Consultant shall furnish all tools and/or materials necessary to perform the Work except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits. D. In the event special training, licensing, or certification is required for Consultant to provide Work he/she will acquire or maintain such at his/her own expense and, if Consultant employs, sub-contracts, or otherwise assigns the responsibility to perform the Work, said employee/sub-contractor/assignee will acquire and or maintain such training, licensing, or certification. E. This is a non-exclusive agreement and Consultant is free to provide his/her Work to other entities, so long as there is no interruption or interference with the provision of Work called for in this Agreement. F. Consultant is responsible for his/her own insurance, including, but not limited to health insurance. G. Consultant is responsible for his/her own Worker’s Compensation coverage as well as that for any persons employed by the Consultant. 19. Other Provisions: A. Approval Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City and Consultant represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the City or Consultant. B. General Administration and Management. The City’s project manager is William Adams. In providing Work, Consultant shall coordinate with the City’s contract manager or his/her designee. C. Amendment and Modification. This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing, duly executed by both Parties. D. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Any exhibits/attachments to this Agreement are incorporated by reference only to the extent of the purpose for which they are referenced within this Agreement. To the extent a Consultant prepared exhibit conflicts with the terms in the body of this Agreement or contains terms that are extraneous to the purpose for which it is referenced, the terms in the body of this Agreement shall prevail and the extraneous terms shall not be incorporated herein. AGENDA ITEM #6. d) PAGE 9 OF 10 E. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the City of Renton. Consultant and all of the Consultant’s employees shall perform the Work in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances. F. Joint Drafting Effort. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as prepared by the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed against one party or the other as a result of the preparation, substitution, submission or other event of negotiation, drafting or execution. G. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any lawsuit or legal action brought by any party to enforce or interpret this Agreement or any of its terms or covenants shall be brought in the King County Superior Court for the State of Washington at the Maleng Regional Justice Center in Kent, King County, Washington, or its replacement or successor. Consultant hereby expressly consents to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction and venue of such court even if Consultant is a foreign corporation not registered with the State of Washington. H. Severability. A court of competent jurisdiction’s determination that any provision or part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect. I. Sole and Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not incorporated are excluded. J. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set forth in the description of the Work is essential to the Consultant’s performance of this Agreement. K. Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than the Parties, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties and no one else. L. Binding Effect. The Parties each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of the Agreement. AGENDA ITEM #6. d) PAGE 10 OF 10 M. Waivers. All waivers shall be in writing and signed by the waiving party. Either party’s failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver and shall not prevent either the City or Consultant from enforcing that provision or any other provision of this Agreement in the future. Waiver of breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach unless it is expressly waived in writing. N. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Agreement in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together constitute this one Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Agreement as of the date last signed by the Parties below. CITY OF RENTON By:_____________________________ CONSULTANT By:____________________________ Armondo Pavone Mayor Steven Noble – Project Manager Transportation Practice Lead _____________________________ Date Attest _____________________________ Jason A. Seth City Clerk _____________________________ Date Approved as to Legal Form By: __________________________ Alex Tuttle Senior Assistant City Attorney Contract Template Updated 9/9/2020 OOTCA contract no. 3146 AGENDA ITEM #6. d) Page 1 of 4 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AIRPORT DIVISION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES A&E ON-CALL The City of Renton’s Airport Division (Airport) is soliciting statements of qualifications for Architectural and Engineering (A&E) Professional Services for the scope of work listed below. The Airport is seeking consultants with expertise in civil design, construction management, and project management, with offices located in the State of Washington and licensed to do business in the State of Washington. Interested consultants must submit Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) as outlined below. Scope of Work The Renton Municipal Airport requires professional, technical, and advisory services as part of its Airport Capital Improvement Program. Projects may include but are not limited to: x Pavement design o Repair of various areas of pavement failure o Pavement markings x Civil engineering x Architectural design x Geotechnical exploration, analysis, and reporting x Security system upgrade design and cost estimation o Wildlife management upgrade and design x Surveying x Aircraft hangar renovation design x Existing airfield fire hydrant system analysis x Cost estimating x Grant writing x ACIP development x Long range planning x Sound study x Environmental engineering feasibility and design x Airspace/sighting study review TERPS x Legal description writing x Appraisals, fee study, rent study x Redevelopment of our Airport Rules, Regulations and Leasing Policies. x Plan review x Constructability review x Administrative services x DBE program development x Project management x Small project engineering including design, construction drawings, permitting, and writing of special provisions. Such small projects may include, but are not limited to structures, drainage studies, drainage pipes and structures, airfield lighting, airfield pavement. Information to be provided in State of Qualifications (SOQ) In addition to the items listed below, submittals from consulting firms and/or individuals must include the firm name and main phone number; name and e-mail address for Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager; disciplines provided by the firm and total number of employees within Washington State. Similar information shall be provided for any sub-consultants. A Submittal Information Form must be completed and attached to the SOQ for the prime consultant and each sub-consultant (if any). Failure to include a Submittal Information Form will not be evaluated. Refer to WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines, Chapter 31, EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF WORK AGENDA ITEM #6. d) Washington Fee Schedule Effective June 30, 2024 Until Further Notice 1 | Page WASHINGTON FEE SCHEDULE Personnel Billing Rates Personnel are identified on our invoices by name and/or labor category. Description Rate Description Rate Accounting Manager $185 Accounting Technician $120 Administrative Assistant $110 Administrative Manager $125 Biologist I $130 Biologist II $140 Biologist III $150 Biologist IV $160 Biologist V $205 CAD Drafter I $105 CAD Drafter II $120 CAD Drafter III $130 CAD Drafter IV $140 CAD Drafter V $150 Senior CAD Drafter $170 Civil and Transportation Designer $135 Senior Civil and Transportation Designer $170 Contract Administrator I $160 Contract Administrator II $185 Corporate Development Manager $230 Cultural Resources Specialist I $120 Cultural Resources Specialist II $140 Cultural Resources Specialist III $145 Cultural Resources Specialist IV $180 Cultural Resources Specialist V $195 Document Production Supervisor $150 Engineer I $135 Engineer II $145 Engineer III $170 Engineer IV $190 Engineer V $200 Engineer VI $215 Engineer VII $225 Engineer VIII $235 Engineer IX $250 Engineer X $280 Engineering Technician I $110 Engineering Technician II $120 Engineering Technician III $135 Engineering Technician IV $145 Engineering Technician V $160 Engineering Technician VI $175 Environmental Specialist I $120 Environmental Specialist II $135 Environmental Specialist III $145 Environmental Specialist IV $165 Environmental Specialist V $180 Environmental Specialist VI $195 Environmental Specialist VII $210 Environmental Specialist VIII $230 Environmental Specialist IX $245 Environmental Specialist X $265 Field Project Representative I $130 Field Project Representative II $140 Field Project Representative III $170 Field Project Representative IV $185 Geologist I $135 Geologist II $145 Geologist III $160 Geologist IV $175 Geologist V $205 GIS Coordinator $175 GIS Manager $185 GIS Specialist $145 GIS Technician $110 Graphics Designer $150 Senior Graphics Designer $165 Hydrogeologist I $140 AGENDA ITEM #6. d) Washington Fee Schedule Effective June 30, 2024 Until Further Notice Description Rate Description Rate 2 | Page Hydrogeologist II $165 Hydrogeologist III $195 Sr. Hydrogeologist $225 Intern I $90 Intern II $105 Laboratory Manager $125 Laboratory Supervisor $105 Landscape Architect I $130 Landscape Architect II $145 Landscape Architect III $160 Landscape Architect IV $175 Landscape Architect V $190 Landscape Architect VI $200 Landscape Architect VII $210 Landscape Designer I $95 Landscape Designer II $115 Marketing Assistant $105 Marketing Coordinator $140 Marketing & Administrative Manager $225 Materials Technician I $95 Materials Technician II $105 Lead Materials Technician $115 Senior Materials Technician $125 Materials Manager $130 Planner I $120 Planner II $145 Planner III $160 Planner IV $175 Planner V $190 Planner VI $200 Planner VII $210 Planner VIII $225 Planner IX $240 Planner X $280 Planning Technician $110 Professional Land Surveyor I $120 Professional Land Surveyor II $130 Professional Land Surveyor III $140 Professional Land Surveyor IV $150 Professional Land Surveyor V $160 Professional Land Surveyor VI $165 Professional Land Surveyor VII $175 Professional Land Surveyor VIII $185 Professional Land Surveyor IX $210 Professional Land Surveyor X $220 Professional Land Surveyor XI $245 Project Administrator $135 Project Assistant I $115 Project Assistant II $130 Project Controller $165 Senior Project Controller $185 Project Manager I $160 Project Manager II $175 Project Manager III $190 Project Manager IV $205 Project Manager V $220 Project Manager VI $235 Project Manager VII $250 Proposal Manager $140 Senior Proposal Manager $210 Public Involvement Assistant $115 Public Involvement Coordinator $155 Public Involvement Planner $135 Public Involvement Program Manager $200 Real Estate Services Manager $180 Right of Way Agent I $125 Right of Way Agent II $140 Right of Way Agent III $155 Right of Way Agent IV $170 Right of Way Agent V $185 Right of Way Agent VI $215 Right of Way Assistant $115 Risk Manager $200 Senior Manager I $240 Senior Manager II $260 Senior Manager III $270 Senior Manager IV $305 Senior Manager V $315 AGENDA ITEM #6. d) Washington Fee Schedule Effective June 30, 2024 Until Further Notice Description Rate Description Rate 3 | Page Senior Manager VI $335 Survey Technician I $90 Survey Technician II $95 Survey Technician III $100 Survey Technician IV $115 Survey Technician IX $170 Survey Technician V $120 Survey Technician VI $130 Survey Technician VII $145 Survey Technician VIII $160 Survey Technician -- Supervisor $155 Systems Administrator $155 Technical Coordinator $180 Utility Operator $145 Water Resource Specialist $195 Water Rights Specialist I $150 Water Rights Specialist II $170 Water Rights Specialist III $205 Water Rights Technician I $105 Water Rights Technician II $115 Water Rights Technician III $125 Survey Crews One-Person Survey Crew = $160 / hour One-Person Survey Crew GPS/Robotics = $180 / hour Two-Person Survey Crew = $240 / hour Two-Person Survey Crew (PLS + LSIT) = $280 / hour Two-Person Survey Crew GPS/Robotics = $255 / hour Three-Person Survey Crew = $350 / hour Travel, Mileage, and Miscellaneous Lodging = Cost per night Airfare = Cost Vehicle Usage – Passenger Cars = $1.10/mile Vehicle Usage – Trucks & SUV’s = $1.30/mile Printing/Supplies/Phone/Fax/Postage = Note 3 In-House Usage Charges = Note 4 Per Diem Unless otherwise specified contractually, per diem will be billed when travel is more than 50 miles from the office during a meal allowance period of three or more consecutive hours or involves an overnight stay. The three meal allowance periods are breakfast (midnight to 10:00 a.m.), lunch (10:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m.), and dinner (3:00 p.m. to midnight). Breakfast Lunch Dinner Incidentals 1st and Last Day Per Diem Rate Bellevue $18.00 $20.00 $36.00 $5.00 $59.25 $79.00 Spokane $17.00 $18.00 $34.00 $5.00 $55.50 $74.00 Vancouver $17.00 $18.00 $34.00 $5.00 $55.50 $74.00 For all other cities not listed above and meal breakdown, use the following link: https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/per-diem-rates AGENDA ITEM #6. d) Washington Fee Schedule Effective June 30, 2024 Until Further Notice 4 | Page Notes 1. DOWL’s Professional Services Fee Schedule is subject to adjustment each year or at the end of a contract period, whichever is appropriate. Should adjustments be anticipated or required, such adjustments will not affect existing contracts without prior agreement between Client and DOWL. 2. Straight-time rates are given. Multiply by 1.5 for overtime rates. Overtime rates will be applied at the rate prescribed by applicable state law. 3. Direct reimbursable expenses such as travel, freight, subcontractors, and request beyond those requests considered reasonable by the project manager for phone/fax/postage, office supplies, reproduction and photography, and laboratory analysis will be billed at cost plus the negotiated markup. 4.In-house equipment usage charges or specialized software/equipment that are not separately stated on the fee schedule will be negotiated at rates deemed fair and reasonable. 5. Late charges will be assessed on the unpaid balance of all accounts not paid within 30 days of the billing date, at a rate of 1.0 percent per month (12% per year). AGENDA ITEM #6. d) Exhibit C ‐ CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Page 1 of 3 Exhibit C CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. City of Renton On‐Call Supporting Engineering Services This ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. is made and entered in to on , 2024, between the City of Renton, (City) and DOWL, LLC (Consultant) collectively (Parties) pursuant to and in compliance with the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ON‐ CALL SUPPORTING ENGINEERING SERVICES CAG‐24‐___ dated , 2024 (Agreement) following RFQ/SOQ and negotiation in compliance with chapter 39.80 RCW. The Parties agree as follows: Each and every provision of the MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ON‐CALL SUPPORTING ENGINEERING SERVICES CAG‐24‐___ dated , 2024 shall remain in full force and effect, and the scope of CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. is as follows: 1. Project Name: 2. City Division: City Project Manager or Contact for Task Addendum: (Name, address, email, phone) 3. Scope of Services is as follows (Or as set forth in CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 1. ) 4. Technical Approach (if necessary) Additional specifications and requirements may be attached to this form or as set forth in CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 2. 5. Deliverables (Or as set forth in CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 3) 6. Schedule (Or as set forth in CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 4.) 7. Cost/Hour Estimates AGENDA ITEM #6. d) Exhibit C ‐ CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Page 2 of 3 Contractor agrees to perform the services as described above for the amount not to exceed $ unless modified by the City in a signed written subsequent CAG‐24‐___ ON‐ CALL TASK ADDENDUM. 8. Due Date or Completion Date: 9. Total Amount Payable to the Consultant under the Maser On‐Call Agreement is summarized as follows: Original Non‐Exclusive MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ON‐CALL SUPPORTING ENGINEERING SERVICES CAG‐24‐___ dated , 2024 authorized amount not to exceed per the duration of the Agreement: $______________ CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. 1 $ (LIST all OTHER CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. as they are implemented.) Grand total of CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM $ Balance remaining under MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ON‐CALL SUPPOORTING ENGINEERING SERVICES CAG‐24‐___ $ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM t as of the date last signed by the Parties below. CITY OF RENTON By: CONSULTANT By: Name: ____________________ Name: __________________ Title: _____________________ Title: ____________________ Date Date AGENDA ITEM #6. d) Exhibit C ‐ CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Page 3 of 3 (Task Addendum Exhibit Headings if needed) CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 1. Task Scope of Services CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 2. Additional specifications and requirements CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 3 Deliverables CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 4. Schedule CAG‐24‐___ ON‐CALL TASK ADDENDUM NO. Exhibit 5 Cost/Hour Estimates AGENDA ITEM #6. d) 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. _______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND SKYWAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT FOR THE TRANSFER OF THREE RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICES IN THE SKYWAY AREA. WHEREAS, an agreement is needed for the transfer of water service for three existing residential water customers from the City of Renton (the “City”) to Skyway Water and Sewer District (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the subject properties are within the existing Skyway Water and Sewer District’s water service area, therefore the transfer of service is consistent with the “Agreement for Establishing Water Utility Service Area Boundaries” in the Amended Skyway Coordinated Water System Plan authorized by Chapter 70A.100 RCW; and WHEREAS, the City and the District intend to enter into an Agreement on Transfer of Water Service Between the City of Renton and Skyway Water and Sewer District (the “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City of Renton will pay to the Skyway Water and Sewer District the Regional Water Capital Facility Charge associated with the installation of three new 1-inch service connections to the Skyway Water and Sewer District water system pursuant to current 2024 Skyway Billing Procedures and Rates; and WHEREAS, the Skyway Water and Sewer District has agreed to waive Local Water Capital Facility Charges; and AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) RESOLUTION NO. _______ 2 WHEREAS, the City and the District agreed to approve their Agreement by resolution or ordinance in order for the Agreement to take effect; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into the Agreement on Transfer of Water Service with Skyway Water and Sewer District for the transfer of three domestic water services to the Skyway Water and Sewer District, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL the ______ day of _______________________, 2024. ______________________________ Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ______ day of _______________________, 2024. ______________________________ Armondo Pavone, Mayor Approved as to form: ______________________________ Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES-PW:24RES0222:08/30/2024 AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) RESOLUTION NO. _______ 3 EXHIBIT A AGREEMENT ON TRANSFER OF WATER SERVICE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND SKYWAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) Page 1 TRANSFER OF WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT ON TRANSFER OF WATER SERVICE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND SKYWAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this XXXX day of XXXXXXXXX, 2024, by and between the CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City” and SKYWAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, a Washington municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “District”, WHEREAS, the District and the City are the owners and operators of water systems in King County, Washington, and the District’s corporate boundary overlaps and/or is adjacent to City’s corporate boundary; and WHEREAS, the City currently provides water service by a 4-inch steel water main to the following three properties, hereinafter referred to as the “Properties”, within unincorporated King County at the addresses listed below and as shown on Exhibit “A”: 7844 South 130th Street (King County tax parcel # 2144800175) 7845 South 130th Street (King County tax parcel # 2144800335) 7855 South 130th Street (King County tax parcel # 2144800334); and WHEREAS, replacement of the City’s 4-inch steel water main that serves the Properties is not cost-effective because the main is at the end of its useful life and has developed several leaks and breaks; and WHERERAS, replacement of the City’s steel water main is not reasonable because the Properties are within the water service area of the District according to the latest update of the East King County Coordinated Water System Plan and the amended Skyway Coordinated Water System Plan; and WHEREAS, the District provides water service to other properties along South 130th Street that are adjacent to the Properties and are also within its water service area through an existing 8-inch water main within South 130th Street, and the District is ready, willing, and able to provide water service to the Properties through this water main; and WHEREAS, it would be in the best interest of the City, the District, and the Properties to transfer water service to the District; and the District is agreeable to providing water service to the Properties for domestic uses and for fire protection; and WHEREAS, the City and the District are authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to RCW 57.08.044; AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) Page 2 TRANSFER OF WATER SERVICE NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein, the Parties mutually agree as follows: 1.The City shall transfer to the District and the District shall accept from the City the responsibility for the provision of water service to the Properties. 2.The City shall, at the City’s sole cost and expense, install the three (3) new 1-inch water service lines with new 5/8-inch x ¾-inch Sensus IPERL water meters per the District’s standards including a ¾-inch individual pressure-reducing valve behind each water meter and reconnect the existing private water service lines to the new water meters. The City shall coordinate the work with the District so the District can be present during the work. 3.The District shall obtain the right-of-way permit from King County and shall pay all applicable permit and inspections fees. The City shall re-imburse the District for all King County’s permit and inspection fees in the total amount not to exceed $5,000. If needed, the City shall be responsible for getting the owner’s written permission to enter and work on the private property (through a right-of-entry, license, temporary construction easement, or similar). The City shall restore the roadway to the County’s standards, at the City’s sole cost and expense. 4.The City shall pay the District for the Regional Water Capital Facility Charge for the new water meters serving the Properties according to the District’s 2024 fee schedule, in an amount not to exceed $7,454_per water meter with a total of $22,362 for the 3 water meters. 5.The District shall waive the Local Water Capital Facility Charge for the new water meters serving the Properties. 6.The District shall not impose any new or additional connection charges on the Properties for the current uses and facilities on the Properties. 7.The parties agree that the City’s transfer of the responsibility for the provision of water service to the Properties to the District does not constitute the assumption of any City assets, facilities, or indebtedness for the purpose of Chapter 36.93 RCW. The parties agree that the terms of this Agreement comply with service area requirements of and are consistent with the “Agreement for Establishing Water Utility Service Area Boundaries” in the Amended Skyway Coordinated Water System Plan authorized by Chapter 70.116 RCW 8.The parties shall transfer the responsibility for the provision of water service to the Properties from the City to the District no later than November 30, 2024; provided that in the event any party other than the City or the District challenges the transfer of the responsibility for provision of water service to the Properties , the transfer shall become effective upon any date provided by law or court order. Upon the effective date of the transfer, the Properties and the owners of the Properties shall be subject to all District resolutions, regulations, policies, and requirements regarding the provision of water service. The parties AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) Page 3 TRANSFER OF WATER SERVICE agree that this transfer does not result in the change of corporate boundaries for either the City or the District. 9.The parties agree to execute any further agreements or documents required for such customer transfer. The City shall provide, at the City’s expense, to the owners and any known residents of the Properties notice regarding the proposed transfer of water purveyor from the City to the District at least 45 days before the date of the transfer. Within the 45-day notice period, the District’s Board of Commissioners shall provide an opportunity at a Board meeting for the owners and residents to comment on the transfer, and shall provide the date of the Board meeting to the City in advance of the City’s notice of the transfer. The City shall include the date, time, and location of the Board meeting in the notice. The City shall provide copies of the notices to the District. 10.Each party shall approve this Agreement by appropriate resolution or ordinance and provide the other party with a copy of the same. This Agreement shall take effect upon its approval by the City Council and the District Board of Commissioners. Each party represents to the other that it has the full power and authority to enter into this Agreement. 11.Nothing herein shall be construed to alter the rights, responsibilities, liabilities, or obligations of either the City or the District regarding the provision of water or sewer services to the Properties or other properties, except as specifically set forth herein. 12.This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the City and District and supersedes any prior understandings and agreements between them with respect to the subject matter hereof. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid or effective unless made in writing and executed by the parties. City of Renton By:_____________________________ Armondo Pavone Mayor Skyway Water and Sewer District By: _____________________________ Name: Cynthia Lamothe___________ Its: General Manager______________ _____________________________ Date _____________________________ Date AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) Page 4 TRANSFER OF WATER SERVICE Attest _____________________________ Jason A. Seth City Clerk Approved as to Legal Form _______________________________ Shane Moloney City Attorney Approved as to Legal Form _______________________________ Name: Rosemary Larson District Legal Counsel Clb 8-30-24 3156 AGENDA ITEM # 8. a) 2,257 188 City of Renton/ Skyway Water Services Transfer This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Three water serivces to be transferred from CoR to Skyway Water and Sewer 11/14/2017 Legend 1280 64 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Feet Notes 128 WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Eric Ott- CoR- PW- Utility Engineer EOttRentonwa.gov City and County Boundary Addresses Parcels District Boundaries Bellevue Highline Issaquah Kent Mercer Island Renton Control Valve Water Gravity Pipe Water Main Water Service Areas Water Service Boundary between Renton and Skyway Existing City of Renton old 4-inch water main to be abandoned WATER SERVICE TO THESE 3 PROPERTIES WILL BE TRANSFERED FROM RENTON TO SKYWAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT Existing Skyway 8-inch water main AGENDA ITEM # 8. a)