No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-320 (2) GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN EAST VALLEY ROAD AND LIND AVENUE. ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF S.W. •16TH AVE, SOUTH TO PROPOSED S.W. 19TH STREET, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT, I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A p „ EA TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON APRIL 3, 1979 BEGINNING AT MO A,M, C •NCERNING ITEM • REZONE i74 SPECS IT TO FILL AND GRADE IN H-1 ZONE L SITE 'At P; I:OVAL AIVER SH :IRELI ' . E MAN .A E' . ENT PE ' ;rk FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO E REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION r ..--1.,,,-- •,'9t47•• o y 11 1 _/�j PO � J' 4 , (_ ��.. I Q 1 ? Q .:"x r"`w d1r''d F i I . C£.D I I I i /, x H .,e+' `�'"" I �, 1 1 ii* 1� \ . 6._R 6NTON VILLAGI2 OL / e " c,c R II!(� lily P "I III I� 1 T . ` j•r `'' -9-1 ,", .- a 'A` P.� .�..;�ji,`� i illll li `,t. .L0111101_ \ 1,15 5 *., i--II F�.10S 'A' , ^^,fairly lA.,Mr 1'.i A Att �, ' ""jl ;r.% _ ^�`'. •� ,..��./• >°. t 1—, — E s��- 110 1 , 1 it r t '.i,it i ��`w, . -."" A �E!+..4SIN",1` }� I II II II I i \, ' \,,} "„ ,.._ "� ft ,,-tl - „0> fi'.1 g9ll=N M M ill E IEIi ilk . '„ ii T ;- -=...• I 111111101 II 4,,,,r-• 2,,, , mv,r., -4- 1 A ,. ,,, . ii_t0• -_-` s ris Z' I -i- -- 1! 2_ ale III /�i - .. -1 i-i pf It`'i:.1--�Y'r'1 -,„9' w III E. - -� n ~t !1•. - 53 0 ,4 I 1 1 49 `� ' `r, ,,e.:0,..-,z4,-,-.1...:04 di 3 # ��.�+ l:! 4QO7r�/(�(�/y • F�- tkj ,, "1, ' '. I I € ui t 99 • • 9.,.,. pI�{ �� II _A- ' '>�F ` ' J j �W - r — 1- 7d i r 14+ ; �11 u=" " �I I +� —1dr' ( �; Ot —aO •S i -1- 1- i — , -t `NtY'- �1- t, _ -1,., k°°``dQjl' le �"' yr _ -• -- . 1--7 ,, - 69 '1 r® I I� �- \ i t+ TT t t , � — t9 .sa? — O ---:--4- ani k u= u i _-___ t. kr il G. � 1111 i 0 r- . , . 1 I 12 9 ••j.�� s � s 4 a ` �1 ✓� 1 -t\,,4/4 �M �� �� l(37•11 .4.„Z:Kt.6.....„, -1F1-.. G I THE AUSTIN COMPANY; File No; SP-320-79 f J. I - i APPLICANT THE AUSTIN COMPANY TOTAL AREA ±29 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via East Valley Road EXISTING ZONING H-1, Heavy Industry; L-1, Light Industry EXISTING USE Site undeveloped; auto repair garage ? lumber company to north; light industrial uses to the west; single family to south and mini-warehouse under PROPOSED USE Fill & Grade Permit for future industrial development construct'ior COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park • ) COMMENTS 1 _ffi • • , • • - , • • . .., . . . . , • m0 , A D • w ..,„••••••.,.. i'•:::•:. ' .---'"- • , . 7.. , . _._. ..________j — 1138 U)a A 53 1. < .--•---— .. . 4911x....•:...,.1.ii,‘INTO:AS AVE S..% • I . 0. 324' - - ••• ••... .... o P.,-1 u)•:iiii. ..i.:..., :"2 --+•:.::: ',...::: z VI''•:: iff: , - :::: • ' ,• ::*::, :',.: ' :• RAYMOND AVE S.W. 4 :.,.: ..3 .; ••• -i:: . ‘.. ...• :ii ••••••:: :,::: ..,.... ,•,... :•., _ . . ._ . 13 ii ' .. .. • I-C ''...1 • . ..'....1: '..::,:. .... .,.. • i'n g Iii : r o .:.... ::, • . m 3 s i.ii "I - ::::!, • ‘_ism . ...ill'. ....il • .. .. • .. I ... .... t;•••i SENECA AVE SW. . M 4 co ill ..... ...... ... ul -1' • ,• • • • ) • 1.,, * ... - EA . • . • • . ,.. l' ..... •.. -. • . .. , ... • , . .• . . , • . " . • .. .. „ . • __ • . -- — , - • ,„.:•. • „ ,-- 0" ••••••••••-. 'I', LIND AVE SW. _ .:..::. -.....„.:. 1132. ..' -8... ::;Fm:T:,;....,.....,...„...,...•:_„...„...x....:„.:... ______r :. :::\ . :,.•* ... .. .. . . _ - .". • •., - • .. •• .. .... .. . . . ,,,i... ,sleti, .. /.0. , .. . . . .,1`.4.,,.„,,,,,,k.:„.,,,,-....P.,.1......";tp., -< :: •• • - --?4,10- .'''''1•-''''',e,,,...i4-.'•4".:7 '44* , i: . ............ ..........:........ ' Vt'f017:71'liv-il0",- ` .",,Er.,-,,,, ..,',,,,o4. A't.''..''i",r. -: , ......... ... ., ,1,. .ikv l',„I',„.4.4,,sv.,:f1•,/,:sp: ',94,.• •''k,4. *..'' :.. - •.- o . "li 14414T '44:1Sr-,....'''Z'r,4,4414,ix,',f1,.',..w.,,.."14''..- ; ,,,--,t-.4'---N, ,,.: •.:. •... ,, •A fl','A'''' 1 k42100,0-13;-;;14'141frWSS:04-1Ciair",*F 1,444*N' J.4"4i .: 1 . ... . •" • • rtt#034- ••:4''''' 2.4::LNE:**47+"'24-t*,,i;---ettilMft-'1'11',1;`,',,f,,,*',J,314:,'4,;." iii '•'''"'•'.•••• ,Vle,7"'NO i-,-:+. 7''''-'0 ''....4f,..41,,r,eert% ,,.7,Z,,,t,-;AIS", 7:.';'....`,`IF ir,u,,,,,,,,v,r,,,,,4 le, :i • d 31011' V.j. 7---,&.',,'''%,- ''''fa,' In`.4.11V V".''',,',`•,,---","'irlit'f -7,i,V,,ii*,'Tit,:'-,:t-''' '• ...„.... ........ . -f--:'-.1 •::::41 M i . ,. iht* tete.,*iftiO ;• .11,3,':4',f Z.;' 41'-'' . '5',141 : -- • • Z .i, ,,,r,.e • .1., '•,rti,:,1 •44.3.`f '' 'PpriorPef4I,F.11:4':'4.":•'•,t'''"Nt '•"hi:, i• k II. -I • 13 •',-""•• '10 4.b.. . ,.*,"..0p4tAii.*•.;,14:1,, .1(07..., ..MX.40.4r-1-4'4,li":.'tVe•'''t,:,0');-•4.-' . .f. ..,4'7.*:'•%*#.707.',"'Irlii*O",,P*0'14' :..4",,rti.,,,k-. -1, - •• • • . •• . 1,?h-,:t„ :. 4 eel...•'...°, ',..,4 tt'px; ' 0 'Rek,..' ''.iettP14:144....'3104'' •itrg-1:-.„31.e.N.,410-,,•'r,i,..,..U,t,4,. `,'-";.,1/4te,',1%-sq,-"-,;„„ .. r•• - . . 2 co_ yg;:..-V,' '...i! ''*;,44'1, >p,,t,'1'.,e,'-; N,„,,,,;740:::1.410:,•14:yei.`tr,;21 ," .:'4: .46..,".kr:: t::. i i / if::: I,.... , \ i .?,tot,t;;Vt•I'''",0*,:t*itilf*-t,",:.,:•,;•1 :i-' .,., ..;,Kf i .•\ '\ ..,(17,:VJ*4',*•••”...."•*47::':.''?..4,:,?,1'.7•1Vi"/A:14'. k:'':" 4'.'," ::•4; ;:. I'm * -4..", 'Y'1,,,,,,;74'4,, '''.4.14-•4.,,,:1, ,i, (i,'t',. ,•‘• , -;t•-,',;r'-. A"'a" .: fi. / L. : ./ .. 1:::..• ::i'i:1 i.,, \,. , Pt 5 1,-4g,,r7 TA21,,tr ,7 134,1....,,,: •,,,,31%.„43-,..,,,-.4,-,4 ‘:., .4` UNt. ,. ... , g N • .,,,•-,•• '.,', tkc.,44'4'2',Alt ''•;,,,j=4"1,,'''4::.:'," Akr;.z,p4:;•4 ,'.:-.,-, . -4 jr,,,T.,-.A.',,rr, ,..11, :: : Am ../ ; ::;.: .1 6h,-- :I A 4,3'(13...,V 4,ehyr•,....14-44.,-.(0.,ai,vr..',".-"A.,, car .I.:.;.4,4, „.,,'4..,1„_4.,..... A".„....q,,yr, ,,,,s .: I 4) --" Vfir,A2'21:, ,Toli%4.17.,„$,,,,4,,5,„,.1;:,,,.',,„...-ett 7. t•-.14.14':l'tt'.4.."z 14.,1•Irr:'11'.,",.`,T.-‘o') I' I / •,;. .Y • ••• .. .. . .. .. • • ',.:1':',. • A23 ‘,. . . tip.Ve-,11; ,gillf,:',40:?:-:,11-i,:;':-1:,-r:z7i-',;•-,',4,-"ZS i l':44.?'`,;''':!%4,-`14•07'.*.•-..,,, ,:,;'i;,i : 7'..• ....i' :i:':: - '".•. '• co 0 ,, ,. .4,,,',,er frft.„:,.;, . , ,,44,,,,, . ,,...,;,. L___ 7. i..,..:: .,01z , , ft.,..,„ ,...,,,, '''..3=,,, .o„1„ f, .. ..• • , S 1., , wt. 1. . .. Wit4,.si t:::::. . ' .%::',;27.;;I•ra ill Wetill,:?4f..r,^-I,:.'41.-....•, , ":".",;;•'::,::,t-,4:-.-- ";-,5‹:.i..'„ "Z.'.:: 'i't.,'",:',‘: f",`,',If ? - ,' /./ N, ii::::. ..." /..1--I:e: 2.,4...t.,.zil,.."4.4,1114t„,.'" ,,,,.1..`1-411110,'-4i,:3;''',,',,',, $t' - -,- :1":`.te''.'','=.411,-t-.1...: , •'' / ). . 'IV'N-.-'`'"-WO,i,--.,'4,4r..g..444 roW:-'''.4.2 .% '.i..1.,..`: .' ' "..-',-i'ke•; tOcitc,,I •••: • .• ' • -- , 0--,••.....ti '4.%'..4,,,': 120 .•;,,,- ,,,,....,4._.,,, ., , ,.. ////: ... W i,4 1'. 4,iii •,,,,47.t.'et,.fp-Al.,:-•%•, ,,,,,I,,,,„.,,,,,,„tp„r N C. TO'^,k4.L.r,.'04' .' / ..:? . . ... ., ..... .....„ • , . .44- •,.•• 4-t, ‘4,..OA. _.....„•'•....,-,No., .'e,,-,,t'4,4,...., c ..,.-•4-.4:4,,,,rig :i.• • ..., .,... ....„ 3 . P 3 •',• '4e:4'r-•...:A44,--:,!z.„,44,tt-f,r,,,,,0,,,...4.4t,',;„,.*,"ff,,, r.r " .. ..... ...... 8- ,;*A.' ..:.. ..• g ill ,,,, .,..,„: ,,,,,...,„,,,,..,,„,„„,,,,,,,...k.• -,,,,,.. .4.- 44.4-0,:!,..x.(15,,,,-.,Ax C .0.,4: ..- ../ 6 U) s'Aix,..4,,, .•'' ..,..' .• ';R • 8. .1'-:?. .`,.1".!:.- .4..--;tiF;tsr,-•z,,,. ii-- -..,,,'.,-,:,',-QT--,.;-•_-,,A,r, r...--„,,,,,,„el' ,..;:„ r• i • • ... .. ... \•• ., -...........m.„.:....../..- ...0> ".s, .....17 cog ••.:•...y....:.:.:.:.:;:;:::„:::,;•:.:.:.:.:.77Z....:. :::,:::*;:;,:,....:,.......,.-• ::'7::::7.::.*et: ,..:::::„.:. .:. . - .. .... .... '7................., ::--------------. ..-.,........ . EAS4.'Si'.... I-. VI KIDA D ,,,7...................................„.........„mgii:0;:lii:!'.::::::ii:ilii2i:iMlf;U:N.T...;'•:::':::.::'.'i.::.:::•:.:!.:;',::.:.'ir:.:.'..'!..i.....:.:. : ::.,,:;;;;;;;::;:''';'::.:': .:'.:''...m.'-'11,;-,,i,:,7;.-;.••••••••••'..;..i.:',.,1•:..:.....7.:..i..!...:11,...17.,:,..,'"..., 4. '. •tv...:.7..: ''''':'''........i0 ..)::''''''''''......'*....:::':;:i!'..:!i:7'2:L.....t...'''.'•"•'.:.:•:.I:,•::::'1'.:,':':,:::,:''':':x:7:77:::':7:7:Mi*:::7:::::,:;i:::;:::.:.:::::.:........:...:.:.;.••••,...,.....r...,-.-- . '''''....... .: .46.7:::.:.:.:.::,:::-.:.:,.::.::i:i'..h:::::*::•::i:::::•:::::::::: ::.:.:.:•:;•::::::.:::.:. .t!i%;,::,.,, ....q.P......ii--5-72:1'.........., . %. : ..:.••....:'..:::•::::n.:.........•••••:::::::.......... .................. :.....„. ...›,' 1:7- ':;:i i•:::. •••.. • ... .77....z,/•••••'''• .........s.,..m.,:.:...:::::.:...:,•...:...:::,,,• .... . • „.. ...... . .......;;M*...............• . • • • ''''':..',:.. : :.:.. ... • .- -.- - - ---- .-- )::: '• . ---7. • ••'N , . .. ••:N.., .. • • .-..... •.:, :. . .. .. . ..,;,.z. .... . .. .. . .. .. :". • .• • . h \ ..;•••••:;,•\\1/4,.. .. .... .. . . . ... • " • ..., •,.. ..... • ,./ ,,,,,,, '•:'.,'• '.:::i.. ' ..4, ., f• • z*1. 1;18?-3 Il; 1‘ \"...k.• .... ,..... , , lz pp Zn-,r+ . cn 0 A Pi P rm in ,..,, . , , . - n Cl , M ,. -, ., • • . . . • • • (-- , . , K --- , • I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 3 , 1979 APPLICANT : AUSTIN COMPANY 1 FILE NO : SP-320-79 A . SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 300,000cubic yards of material on a 29-acre site along the East Valley Road . (Site development map attached . ) B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : PAUL S . CHIADO 2 . Applicant: AUSTIN COMPANY 3. Location : ! Between the E . Valley Road and Lind (Vicinity Map Attached) Avenue S .W . on the south side of S . W. 16th Avenue South to proposed S .W. 19th St. 4 . Legal Description : A detailed •legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of 'Property : ±29 acres 6. Access':`' i Via East Valley Road 1 7 . Existing Zoning : H-1 , Heavy Industry ; L-1 , Light Industry 8. Existing Zoning in the; Area : H-1 , Heavy Industry; M-P , Manufacturin Park ; L-1 , Light Industry ; "G" General Classification District. 9 . Comprehensive Land Use; Plan : Manufacturing Park 10. Notification : The applicant was notified inwriting of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on March 23 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on March 22 , 1979. C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1745 dated April 14 , '1959 . It was rezoned to H-1 by Ordinances #1845 and 1955 dated January 9 , 1960 and May 14 , 1962 respectively . D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is essentially level . 2 Soils : Urban Land (Ur) . The erosion hazard is slight to moderate . No capability or woodland classification . Puget silty clay loam (Pu ) . Permeability is 'slow . The seasonal high water table is at or near the surface . Runoff is slow to ponded , and the erosion hazard is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard . This soil is used for row crops and pasture . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: THE AUSTIN COMPANY , File No : SP-320-79 APRIL 3 , 1979 PAGE TWO 3 . Vegetation : With the exception of a few scattered deciduous trees , the site is predominantly covered with grass and scrub brush . 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation may provide suitable habitat for bird's and mall mammals . 5 . Water: No water was evidenced on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : .,An automobile repair garage and service station are located to the north of the subject site and a lumber company ; light industrial uses are situated west. To the south is an existing single family residence and mini -warehouse presently under construction . The East Valley .Fre(eway. is located to the east . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area consists of a combination of presently developed industrial property and undeveloped land in the process of being prepared for such development. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : : . 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12" water main extends east 450 ' from Lind Avenue N . W. at which point a 6" main extends approximately another 450' adjacent to the northerly boundary of the subject site . A 16" water main runs north-south on Lind Avenue adjacent to the westerly boundary. An 8" sanitary sewer extends north-south along the E. Valley Road approximately 1 /2 mile south of the site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route #1.56 operates along SR 16.7 to the east of the subject site . 4 . .Schools : Not Applicable . 5 . Recreation : Not Applicable . G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-713 , H-- 1 , Heavy Industrial District. 2 . Chapter 23 , Mining , Excavation , and Grading . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Comprehensive Plan , Green River Valley , June 1976 , Goals and Objectives . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , .increase storm water runoff and cause an increase in traffic and noise levels in the area . However, through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated . 2 . Population/Employment : The present fill and grade permit will have no ' direct impact on employment , however, future industrial use of the filled property will need to be addressed upon specific development. 3. Schools : Not Applicable`. H r . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : THE AUSTIN COMPANY , FILE NO : SP-320-79 APR',IL 3 , 1979 PAGE THREE 4 . Social : Not Applicable . 5. Traffic : Potential adverse truck traffic movements will occur during the "fillimg. period. Conditions related to hours of operation will reduce the level of adverse impact- (see further analysis below) . 300 ,:000 cubic yards of fill will require about 12 ,000 truckloads ,: thus 24 ,000 truck movements . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Re'nton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy. Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance will be required.r At this time - additional data has been requested to clarify certain issues listed in #4 of the' analysis . No, action may be taken until a declaration ' is prepared. , K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2. City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic, Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. 6. King County Division of Hydraulics . L . PLANNY IG, D:EPARTMENT ANALYSIS : ,1-. ,' The subject site is presently zoned H-1 (Heavy Industry) which , will permit commercial or industrial future development on the site . The proposal generally conforms to ' the comprehensive planning and zoning for the area . 2 . The applicant. dogs not; have a specific development plan for the subject "s;ite 'at the present time . However , he indicates that interest has been, shown for development on the site providing the site is properly filled and graded. Future development will be subject to City of Renton standards including the Hearing Examiner ' s: Site Plan approval per Section 4-2302 . 2 . 0 and the requirements of the restrictive covenants running with the land . 3. An LID is under construction for the extension of Lind Avenue S .W . (80-foot right-of-way)' along the easterly boundary of the subject site.. 4. The applicant' s prior ;fill and grade permit approval (SP-063-77 ) is located to the immediate west of Lind Avenue . This previous permit provided for filling to elevation 23. 5 , this above the floodplain level 21 . 8 feet. This current application proposes an elevation 17 , which is insufficient to comply with the minimum floodplain level of 21 . 8 feet. Although this application will commit 29 acres of future development in industrial use no uses are currently known , and the proposed fill does not achieve a developable elevation . Due to the size of the area involved and questions as to future use are unknown at this time , the Planning Department has requested the following information to provide clarification of the Environmental Checklist : (a ) What general types of uses are proposed , and when development is expected to occur. (b) A detailed traffic analysis of said proposed uses . ' I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: THE AUSTIN COMPANY , File No : SP-320-79 APRIL 3 , 1979 PAGE FOUR (c) Clarification of appropriateness of only partially filling the site . Due to the fact that this information may not be available prior to the hearing , a continuance may be requested . 5 . The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department advises that the present drainage ways shall not be filled until specific pla1rs , are approved and implemented . (See also comments on the submitted vicinity map . ), 6. The Utilities Engineering Division indicates that the subject proposal will required water and sewer extensions and that latecomer ' s fees will be assessed. 7 . In reference to #4 of the analysis , the Building Division notes that fill in, addition to the proposed by the applicant will be necessary prior to any building construction .because the 17 ' elevation is not acceptable. 8. The Police Department has recommended that access to the site be limited to the East Valley Road and S .W . 16th Street. Other comments about debris , hours of fill 'operation , and signing appear to be very appropriate in light of the 24 ,000 truck movements required . (See attached memorandum for comments . ) 9 . Review of SP-063-77 indicates that the Hearing Examiner requested from the City Attorney an opinion 'on setback requirements for landfalls (see SP-063-77 for background) . . The subject proposal is gove,rned by the same legal opinion ., If the applicant believes that the 10 ' setback requirement of Section 4-2314 cdnstitutes an undue hardship , then it will be necessary to file a' variance application with the Board of Adjustment. 10. The Hearing Examiner' s conditions of approval in SP-063-77 should also apply to this application . Copy of previous action attached. Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : At the time of this report preparation , the applicant has not been able to submit the information requested to complete the ,.. environmental review as discussed in #4 of the analysis section . Should sufficient information be available at the hearing , approval may be recommended subject to , but not necessarily limited to : 1 . Those 8 conditions of SP-063-77 (copy attached ) . 2. Those 7 conditions recommended by the Police Department. f i INTER-OFFICE MEMO TO: CHIEF ,DARBY 3/17/79 DATE FROM: LT. . D.R. PERSSON RE: LANDFILL APPLICATION The Austin Company has made application to fill a 29 acre area in the area of SW 16th and the East Valley Rd. After surveying the area Sgt. Saude and myself make the following recommendations on the fill operation. 1. Entrance to the fill site for the filling operation be off the East Valley Rd as close as possible to the proposed SW 19th Street. 2 . Exit from the site be on to SW 16th Street in the area of Maple Ave SW. 3. All .fill trucks will approach the fill area by traveling northbound on the East Valley Rd. 4. All empty' trucks after exiting the site at SW 16th will travel west on SW 16th to Lind SW and then north on Lind SW to Grady Way, then east on -Grady Way to Hwy 167. 5. The roadway will be kept clean of all dirt and debris "AT ALL' TIMES" . 6. The hours of the fill operation be either from 6 AM until 2 PM or from 8. .AM to 4 PM. 7. That both the entrance and exit to the site be posted with the appropriate signing as directed by the Traffic Engineering 'Office. Two items in the conditions may need a little bit of explaining, the first being the proposed route. The reasoning behind our proposed routing is that we feel this route will provide the least amount of disruption to our normal traffic flows as well as it will also be the safest route in that it will provide a circular ' route for all the trucks coming and going and will not adversely effect the traffic flow. The other one is our suggested hours of operation. Our feeling is that in all fairness to the dirt haulers they should be allowed an eight hour operation period, however, by specifing 6 AM to 2 RM or 8 AM to 4 PM they will only impact one rush hour period. By starting at 6 AM they would be off the roadway by the afternoon rush hour and by starting at 8 AM in the morning they really would not start hauling until after the morning rush hours , however, would be into the evening rush hour a little bit. Lt. D.R. Persson The Examiner requested a legal opinion regarding this matter in the attached memoranda dated August 30, 1977 and August 31, 1977. Existing ordinances (Chapter 23 and 30) prevent the Examiner from granting a variance from the slope setback requirement of Section 4-2314.2. However, it seems app P ri to comment•upon the effect of this additional setback requirement. The setback of Section 4-2314 is intended to ". . .preserve the setback for the safety and benefit of adjacent properties, the adequacy of foundations, and to prevent damage as a result of water runoff or erosion thease lopes."an (Section 4-2314.1) The purpose of Chapter 23 is to ". . .protect. . . s. . . against detrimental effects" (Section 4-2301.C)' and to "Promote safe, economic, systematic. . .grading, activities. . ." (Section 4-2301.2.D) . Application setback will accomplish these purposes; however, it may be counterproductive in instances,:, A moat could be created if the fills do not meet - a setback area. . . equal to double the ,building setback area and 10-foot slope setback for "protecting" each property. This appears not to be the intent of the ordinance. The intent seems to .be to require landfill to be set back from adjacentat prroperty yf where the landfill may be detrimental to that abutting property protection. However, in other instances nothing detrimental can nnbeilshol wn, but ons. moats may be created around neighboring properties undergoing it appears in this case that a variance should be sought from the Board of Adjustment. In addition, Section 4-2314 should probably be revised 'to accomodate a wider range of .situations. DECISION: ` Based upon the record, findings and conclusions, the grading and filling Special Permit is approved subject to: 1. Landscaping of 2% of the site for wildlife habitat purposes per •the landscaping . materials suggested in Exhibit #5 as approved by the Planning Department. This - landscaping is to be installed upon completion of the landfill operation. 2. Finalization of the storm water retention system and its approval by the Public Works Department. • 3. Dust control be implemented by water sprinkling. • 4. Control of mud and debris on adjacent or affected public right-of-way be implemented by a mechanical sweeper adn water flushing. 5. Exposed slopes, are to be hydroseeded to control erosion. . 6. Fill material will conform to the requirements of Chapter 23, Title IV. 7. Tops of 'the slopes to be no less than 10_feet from the building setback lines established by Section 4-713 (D) (e) . • SP-063-77 Page Five 8. Public Works Department monitoring and approval of access and traffic control. ORDERED THIS 13th day of September, 1977. L. Rick Beeler t , ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Rr2ark Department Police Department ® Public Works Department 0 Building Div . Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div .8 FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) /� CM 179 `' C -°` Cr DATE : V Ie 19 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 11(t 4U417k LOCATION :( .ice. efe 1A J 4u . 6 N. iii) 10 APPLICATION(S) : �M', -: ' r (44 ' ha li IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : �-- �� '�-c%.� -19-k4d.. , LI Approved LJ Not Approved Comments or co itio s : �/ , i..omments or conditions : ' , , 3 - / - 77 Sigma ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date • Prig/CITY OF RENTON th Atm APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT W i' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY � DE'P AC File No. SP- .2ab "7/ Date Rec.' d• Application Fee $ GOO- OU Receipt No . F.34.5 Environmental Review Fee $ O© . APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name THE AUSTIN COMPANY Phone 206-226-8800 Address 800 S.W. 16th Street, Renton, Washington 98055 2 . Property location Between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue on the south side of S.W. 16th Avenue south to proposed S.W. 19th Street. 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Blocks 19, 20 &23 of C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of .Seattle Division No. 1, as •per Plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats on page 74 , records of King County less lots 8 , 9, 10 , 49 , 50 and 51 of Block 19 , , less that portion of Block 19 conveyed to the State of Washington by Deeds recorded under auditors file No. 3916580 and No. 4554803 . 4 . Number of acres or square feet 29 acres Present Zoning H-1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Preparation for possible future development. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other • factors limiting development) . . . . . . . . . . 1" = 10° or 20 ' B. Parking , landscaping and screening plan . . . . . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning • on adjacent parcels) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) . E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks . Planning Dept. 1-77/ ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department . Fire Department Library Department Park Department Slice Department Public Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div . ® Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Ut.ilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his design ) e /e 99 s- d' ' Review, o.i ECF- 479 ; Application No . : --'V..®--7q SUBJECT: ,. �� Action Name : at, INDMIAJ, P -, . IAA Ott) Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : 9/tv 7 q Note : .Res;ponses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1 ! SIGNIFICANT NON SIG FICANT Comments : � ` s 7/ /0/ dam -S/. S; Lp?;lT/ G "/;// S .-/'2/e.6 r'ipre /t-f d le:c/o • /Vhf Signature of Director or Authorized Representativ Date I / ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department ®,"lice Department , Public Works Department p ' lding Div. ngineering Div. (Please verify legal description) Traffic Engineering Div. , Utilities Engineering Diva. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) VA\J i t2 c . . '01 DATE : /4/9 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : T 401)Ai 6.0 LOCATION : . ADD Att. 6 A • . ii) !0 APPLICATION(S) : N; KRAIr , i ' al, 4 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING 'EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De artment : � , App • roved LIOPOiCTIPTGved .omments or conditions : . . _ . . - .f ` .saw y / uomments or conditions : dam— .31,V/?91! Signature of Director or Authorized R pres native Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department ® Public Works Department O Building Div . ® gineering Div. (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) f2 Qfl17 'fie� �"�� DATE : /44'/� 9 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : -rii 4u41J &o. LOCATION : LEAD i 6 /1,) 9Ut APPLICATION(S) : progrer / I IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : TitAI' oy"ci°pi ( oor®w4 ZEO Approved L11 Not Approved Comments or conditions : comments or conditions : RDate Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. pgineering Div. Traffic Engineering Div . ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department-,, (signed by responsible official or his. desire) � r /, 0110 e ie/99 0 , ;, , V :.No . SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4Vi5-49 ; Application .1A --WPen_ Action Name : 614 IN DU t iA,id, PIA � Ai lidi 4* Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : 14e, 'I/ Note : Responses to be written in ink. . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7464 t icNesev Ii f 1 SIGNIFICANT ► : NON SIGNIFICANT Comments :, . 4 . ..: . 5®i5 7F Signature of Director o Authorized Representative Date V \, r , . l ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department 0 Police Department ® Public Worts Department I" Building Div . 0 Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) pignee )a9 6190.)1, DATE : /t T9 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 4(j1flJ ' .) . LOCATION : 7.i. ��k� he • Uo1' APPLICATION(S ) : IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (,Z—"D� En- Approved Lj Not Approved Comments or conditions : ' ,,Q ; /// Gc.,; CrLQ- / g-6 /6-c iz-D6.5- e.,,e: ...--7. c'D Ck,e--A-(2/-7-741 ' 1 aLaele2A W-14- 7) . //' _5'.--i -7?'-' ' Signatu a of Director or Authorized Representative Date w 1 - t ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® -finance Department Fire Department ,� Library Department J/ (Ti Park Department - /� 0 Police Department: Public Works Department n` ® Building Div . , ® Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) _\. ® Traffic Engineering Div . (- Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) 1I17 12 C1040s) DATE : V ng TY PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : lit 4U41k1 01). LOCATION : 'At . M D kt 6 pj• ) �/ ilt, APPLI:CATION(S) : 0 IAL. NI1 ii 4 : 14 4 IN ORDER TO B.E INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX ITV RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : 6 REVIEW BY OTHER. CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1— / ;" e- ] Approved L Not Approved Comments or conditions : i I) 1 p e r h-1 1 o►-1 1 i (. D,S J��0 3 i -L - 71 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : LT«.-c7Ar� pproved C=1Not Approved Comments or conditions : 0cZ.,/r„c�1`,,, ,c,,,, W\`,_ gri a.J11Cie wLLT-ript 4,5r?wri r'x'rt?rw-n0r4s y. L-a-rii cV6-rr1?nS f=rei.4S Gda. 3 - '3 - 77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date r i • ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Q Hance Department Fire Department /V.' Library Department ® Park Department ,.¢'� Q Police Department oPublic Works Department 7 � 0 Building . Div . ` Q Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) i \ Tra fic Engineering Div . eetdUtilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) DATE : 19 X PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : lilt; 4U'!$(Ik 4.19. LOCATION : .tJ. 6f LA JD 4v . 6 N. / !� llf • APPLICATION(S) : ' JI L. /'+I (1 ii't1 -..7 : ,i , . 4 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX IN ' RETURN. ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : • • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 111i1" e CO Approved LJ Not Approved Comments or conditions : • J— I') 1 pty^ h-, i ± 0►1 I :i,/ 1 \ . t 0 CLO:4L -.3 - 1 -2_ — 2 ei Signature of D 9 irector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UTkLA iT s Ma-Oproved _ [D Not Approved Comments or conditions : oct.,t(�'<<,'vr, ,,,7 LA)Nc" _ TZ/4.0,01 ltt/_ wArTri+A 4..`l7wrl,c ' E x rrIt'arn OP-4S 'L L-A,T(l cv,,rSn g rre.-/, & a, "3 - t3- 77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department ® Police Department ® Public w r1s Department Building Div . 0 Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or 'his designee) 12L12enr.# ,40' DATE : 91fpz119 ( PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: fi APPLICANT : 4J' flk1 to. ; ' 'l� LOCATION : 7.4 . g4= 01/40 kt !10 APPLICATION(S ) : ��.. l: ->0' r d lee"1 : u 4 4gArx IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : G L-D ,,, - Approved L Not Approved Comments or conditions: �/// Ay_ 0� l b- F f // // ' aAtt—te_. _0,_ . . . --ram-. - - . c pk-4,,,/- , _ - /,_.,_ czr-D65 . ...,,e_ _.--- ,cD ce.e__-e-J,2-/-24 6-e , , _1- i ---- /7 Signature Of Director or Authorized Representative Date A ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: Finance Department Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department ® Po ice Department Public Works Department O B ' lding Div. Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description) Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Departments (signed by responsible official or his designee) /� VAfl17 Y.�t �' 4 DATE : 60 79 PLEASE REVIEW THIS �APp�PLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : I 4u4-flkl (IO• LOCATION : s�. 1I1�D 40, !6 APPLICATION(S) : Oge446410, -r / -7 gu, 4psivx IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • De artment : crce Approved c Not App ved omments or conditions : . . . y_ - o . L,omments or conditions : .31iy1/2 9 Signature of Director or Authoriz d R pres n ative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department slice Department Public Works Department 10, Building Div. (�.,�- Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . © Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his design' ) 9 B� �� VI -0 -^Y6VPm449 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4�'�;; � ; Application No . : =- Action Name : lei 9J Du Ik (4 - ` 6. but f jc oA '1/Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : 1/2 © / , Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : NON S 1 ( SIGNIFICANT5;r-4 IG- FICANT ' Comments : ig7t.e.e4-71,,e7 z-Z---214:-/ed-",_, 6,(,../7_5* -- 5=-4/1 /70 71 .44 /2/ . /J/ram s. • a U� -//.•/- S e fi ' •/4 r"re tie 01 a)v 0/ /7 7 7,/e/-7-1g--72 leci,,,,_ 2/41,6_,e- te-A-7,L.----33/77 s' 4)4, 4,,_ al/gA7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representativ Date OF R 4$ ® z' THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 90, P 235- 2550 Fp SEP4�.O March 28, 1979 King County Resource Planning W-217 , King County Courthouse . Seattle , Washington 98104 , Gentlemen : Enclosed are copies of a proposed site plan for your, review at the southwest corner of S .W. .16th Street and the East Valley Road , within the City of Renton . We welcome any comments your office may have to offer o,n „this project. Response by April 6 , 1979 will be appreciated . Thank you. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen , . Planning Director . vg ,17/4tA-rt4e-7 . Steve Munson ,, ' Assistant Planner Enclosures - SM;sh • OF THE CITY OF RENTON `• z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055ea Li elm CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR i PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 235- 2550 04.4„. 3EPSe„do March 28, 1979 King County Division of 'Hydraulics Room 9.76: King County Administration Bldg . Seattle , Washington 98104 Gentlemen : Enclosed are copies of a proposed site plan for your review at the southwest corner of S.W. 16th Street an'd the East Valley Road , within the City of Renton . We welcome any comments your office may have to offer on this project. Response by April . 6 , 1979 will be appreciated. Thank you. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. .Erick.sen , Planning Di rector Si& Steve Munson, . Assistant Planner Enclosures - SM;sh NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON APRIL 3 , 1979 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. FRANCIS J . BRIERE , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO SR-1 , File R-306-79 ; property located in the vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. N . E . 2. THE AUSTIN COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN H-1 ZONE, File SP-320-79 ; property located between East Valley Road and' Lind Avenue on the south side of S .W. 16th Ave. So. to proposed S .W. 19th Street. 3. HOLMES ELECTRIC , APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE IN M-P ZONE , File. SA-322-79 ; ' property located at 1500 Raymond Ave. S .W. Applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. r ALL INTERESTED :PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 3, 1979 AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EIXPRESSCTHEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PIUBLISHED March 23 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION DAVID R. CLEMENS , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the 21st day of March 19 7g SIGNED OF RA,A �yQ z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.88055 a r©ILL CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT P• 235- 2550 9�TFD sErt -15 • March 13, 1979 The Austin Company 800 S .W. 16th Street Renton , Washington 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN H-1 ZONE , File SP-320-79 ; property located between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue on the south side of S .W. 16th .Ave. So . to proposed S .W . 19th Street Dear Mr. Kosteniuk : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 6 , 1979 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for April 3. 1979 at 9 : 00 a. m. . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y ricksen _ Plannin Director David .Clemens Associate Planner cc : Paul S. Chiado Metro Industrial District 800 SW 16th St . Renton , WA 98055 -5- (12) Housing. Will the -proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? x YES Wit NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? )C YES MAYBE HB— (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X Y'EB- MAYBE RI- (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X fE — MAYBEWU- (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X Ya- MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? sG Y - MAYBE N Explanation: (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NU— (b) Police protection? TB- MAMA B (c) Schools? )C YES MAYBE 11 (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X YES MMYbE NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? )C YES' MB AO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: - (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X YES RATITE WU- (b) Communications systems? X Yam' unr Far- (c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO -6- • (d) Sewer or septic tanks? K YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm 'water drainage? )44 . Y E S UTNE NU (f) Solid waste and disposal? 14 YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any liealth hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Y. Y€T MAYBE N0 Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of anyany scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ?C YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: (19) Recreation.. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the • quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? >G YES MAYBE N� Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? ?( YET— MAYBE. Nb— Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: P. �. !�.d- ' I?�-^ (signed) PA t.PA ti L 1A) s TTN,ul< (name printed) City of Renton ' Planning Department 5-76 -3- (2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X (b) The creation of objectionable odors? x Y€s- MAYBE au- (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally Cr regionally? ?C VET- RAW NW Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in.: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES- MAYBE NO (b) Changes' in absorption rates , drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YET- MAYBE 0-- (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES RUNE" N- (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES ME No (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? K YET- MAYBE NU- (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? K YET MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? K YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X 'ES MAYBE FT (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NU- Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass , crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? 3< Y€r- MAYBE TO-- (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? v MAYBE Nb-- (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or " in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X rr- MAYBE AB- (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X • PEA Mir AB- Explanation,: - ( ) t7VL-2CoIE2iA)G LX/ sri,u G SteASSa • -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? YES WRY NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE' NO • (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? l�ES ravrir NO (d) Deterioration to existing, fish or wildlife habitat? X YE.-- Wit NU— Explanation: 7NE12E MAY 13E Solt W/LbLIFE StJCN AS Rs9L3B/ T S t Ld 1!L'E 1 £1'C 7't-1scT &1L z BE t7I S PLA C E✓J O2 Y F 1 LL/Al G i4N O 4:1.4 L!i nJa. . (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? �( YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE AU Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? ?� YET— APR- NU— Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE N Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? }C YES MAYBE NS Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ Mir AU— Explanation: S °- 3 20---?? • i ' �� T E AU STI N 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET 'U ` RENTON.WASHINGTON98O55 COMPANY TELEPHONE 910.4 206/226-8800 t�� 1� TELETYPE 9 f 0.423.0882 • DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS • /�T September 9 , 1980 r' ' (� • \,` Mr . Warren G . Gonnason , Director ,V „e Department of Public Works City of Renton Renton , Washington 98055 ', d„ Subject : Fill and Development Limits on VO & IP Subdivision No . 2 Dear Mr . Gonnason : As you are aware , we are preparing a site development plan for Lot 1 of proposed Valley Office and Industrial Park, Subdivision No . 2 . The area generally included in Lot 1 is • currently being filled under a Renton permit limiting fill to the "north half" of the site . Considering "north half" to be an inexact term for an irregular area , and with the box culvert under SR 167 discharging north of the midpoint of the lot , we request that you consider the south lot 'line of Lot 1 to be acceptable for the filled limits . The area of Lot 1 plus the area north of the Caraccioli tract is 14 .0 acres , with the total subdivision acreage being 28 . 3 acres . We appreciate your consideration in this matter . Very truly yours , /44-ee0 Paul S. Chiado Vice President and District Manager PSC:dt // cc-Renton Planning Dept Renton Hearing Examiner 1 • LLTHSTREE; N 89°35'25H E-411.I7' N 89°35'25"E-448.59' 80' 0 1 0 o i 1 00' W N d 0. -p r� =90°02'42'1 z o R=243.8T . z •• o ft u tf . N 89°35'33"E-261.13' "'I I . '.1 w I 61 I g • CD to v � -- �_ oo N.oi I 50 o z I 49 1 10 • N 89°35 36 E-264.82 • • 250X C1LPeer • • m - - �'�i1�Poiiv7 t7Ei(l/EEit) Syt//6 �� $W ��LN 4 o ni M N W (D • 500 = 830'= ,,,. e 292'1 c Y n I I �^ Fr'- L A ° • C j z O • 11 1si a rr- CD c ti a 1 I 505'1 I N89°49 01 W-I I38.55 633'1 co S.W. 19TH STREET o • I I i 1 1110 OF R�,4 ti ,, E sy � z TH CI TY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o ° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI•MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A (o• FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 094 7. eb sEP.E1#� May 9, 1979 Mr. Paul Kosteniuk The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. SP-320-79; The Austin Company. Dear Mr. Kosteniuk: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted in the Examiner's report of April 24, 1979, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states:' That on the 24th day of April , 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this �`� ` day of �` C-•\ 19 1 . "4 H11 Notary Public in and for the State c• of Washington, residing at "Pe ton...-_ .r'(_• Application, Petition or Case: Austin Company; SP-320-79 (The minute4 contain a £Lst of the pattLea ob '.ecohd) SP-320-79 Page Two Paul Kosteniuk Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Kosteniuk indicated his concurrence in Exhibit #2, noting that disagreements relating to finish grades which originally existed with recommendations contained in Exhibit #1 had been clarified by the supplementary report. He inquired if the permit would allow increased volume of landfill if determined necessary at a later date to meet proposed elevations., or if revision would require an additional public hearing through the Examiner process. Mr. Kosteniuk noted that due to unknown factors relating to degree of settlement, the exact amount of landfill cannot be determined. Following further discussion, it was determined by the Examiner and Mr. Clemens that if additional landfill is required to meet basic design parameters and proposed elevations, the revision could be reviewed by staff during the annual license process. Mr. Clemens indicated his opinion that if the site area and elevations are not exceeded, the current permit would remain valid, although substantial increase of volume to the extent of 400,000 cubic yards would require additional review through the hearing process. The Examiner requested an estimated completion date for the project. Mr. Kostenium indicated that current available material would provide 50% of the estimated landfill within a period of one year, with the remaining landfill provided as soon as possible as it becomes available. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the applicant's willingness to comply with ordinance requirements for fill composition, Mr. Kosteniuk indicated his concurrence. The Examiner requested a representative from the Public Works Department to respond to the traffic analysis contained within Exhibit #2. Responding was: Paul Lumbert Traffic Engineering Division Mr. Lumbert indicated that the projected volume of truck trips from the site could be adequately accommodated by existing roadways in the area. The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative. Mr. Clemens indicated that the recommendations contained in Exhibits #1 and 2 would remain as submitted with the addition of the previous clarification of ordinance requirements pertaining to site area and final elevations. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. SP-320-79 was closed by the Examiner at 9:35 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a special permit to fill 29 acres to elevations of 17 and 18 feet per Exhibits #4 and 5. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. Opposition to the proposal was expressed by the King County Department of Community Development (Exhibit #6) on the basis of availability of surplus filled industrially zoned land within the flood zone and absence of a "watershed project." 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the requirements of Chapter 23 (Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance) of.Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances; except for: a. Plans for rehabilitation of the site were not submitted per Section 4-2306. I F 411 . 411 • April 24, 1979 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION , APPLICANT: Austin Company FILE NO. SP-320-79 • LOCATION: Between the East Valley Road and Lind Avenue. S.W. on the south • side of S.W. 16th Avenue S. to proposed s.W. 19th Street. • SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 300,000 cubic yards of material on a 29-acre site along the East Valley Road. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT • The Planning Department preliminary report and the subsequent REPORT: addendum were received by the Examiner on March 29, 1979 and April 12, 1979, respectively. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department ,report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner • conducted a public hearing •on the subject as follows: • The hearing was opened on April 3, 1979 at 9:25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the 'Renton 'Municipal Building: David Clemens, Associate Planner, referenced staff concerns denoted in Section J. • (Environmental Assessment/Threshold Determination) and Section L.4 (Analysis) of the Planning Department staff report pertaining to provision of additional information to clarify the environmental checklist requirements to allow issuance of:a declaration of non-significance for the proposal. He advised the applicant's request for a two-week continuance to enable provision of the required information. The public hearing was subsequently closed by the Examiner at 9:10 a.m. and continued to April 17, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. • CONTINUANCE: • The hearing was opened on April 17, 1979 at 9:07 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. • Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report and addendum, and the reports were entered into the record as Exhibits #1 and #2, respectively. • David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibits #1 and 2, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: • Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map • Exhibit #4: Existing and Proposed Contour Sheets (2) Exhibit #5: Cross Sections of Proposed Fill, • Exhibit #6: Letter from King County Planning Division to Planning Director, dated April 4, 1979. Exhibit #6 relates concerns of the King County Resource Planning Division for landfill on industrially zoned land in designated flood hazard areas until applications for building permits have been filed on 75% of the currently filled and vacant lands. • The Examiner requested clarification of the number of truck trips required to deposit the proposed landfill. Mr. Clemens advised that dependent upon truck capacity, 24,000 truck trips were estimated. •The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1 and #2. Responding was: F4 k • I " SP-320-79 Page Four This is a policy decision of the King County Council and Renton City Council which has yet to review this issue. In the meantime, it seems reasonable to approve the application. DECISION: Approve the application subject to compliance with all requirements of Chapter 23 per review and approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments per Conclusions No. 1 through 5 and completion within four years. ORDERED THIS 24th day of April, 1979. ,‘&1 -61,A MI reeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of April, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Paul Kosteniuk; Austin Co. , 800 S.W. 16th St. , Renton, WA TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of April, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Paul Lumbert, Traffic Engineering Division Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before May 8, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling, that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. • • SP-320-79 Page Three b. Compliance with the setback requirements of Section 4-2314. • c. Plans for mud and dust control were not submitted per Section'4-2312. d. Storm drainage plans do not clearly comply with Sections 4-2307.5.E, 4-2313 and 4-2318.. • e. Erosion control was not specified per Sections 4-2312.10, 4-2313, 4-2318.2 and • 4-2319. 8. An. annual license .from the Planning .and Public Works Departments is required per Sections 4-2307.2.B, 4-2307.4, 4-2310 and 4-2309. The staff reviews the project prior to issuance of the annual license. for compliance with the Examiner's decision and the provisions of Chapter 23. . 9. The landfill will be. 50% accomplished within one year, and the remainder of the site will be filled as material becomes available. 10. Estimated traffic impacts (Exhibit #2) can be accommodated adequately on 'existing streets according to' the testimony of the Public Works Department. 11. A State Flood Zone Control Permit is required of the King County Division of Hydraulics. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal is compatible with the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. Appropriate wildlife habitat mitigation measures per the Plan and Resolution'No. 192.3 will be required during development of specific Site' plans for the property or during rehabilitation of the landfill per Chapter 23. 2. The landfill operation will ". . .not be an unreasonable detriment to the surrounding area." (Section 4-2303.2.B) . However, this is based upon staff approval of appropriate erosion control, storm drainage and wildlife habitat mitigation measures prior to beginning the landfill and during review of the annual license. 3. Compliance with requireinents 'of Chapter 23 (per Finding No. 7). can adequately be secured by staff prior to issuance of the permit for the landfill operation and/or issuance of the annual license. The Planning, Public Works and Police Departments should collectively review the permit and license to achieve a single set of conditions for approval of the permit and license. 4. Although 50% of the site will be filled within one year, leaving completion of the landfill operation open ended to whenever fill material becomes available does not appear within the intent of Section 4-2307.3. The applicant did not indicate when' the operation would be completed. However, a reasonable completion period appears to be four years from issuance .of the permit to begin the operation. This will provide approximately three years to complete the operation following filling 50% of the site in the first year. 5. The cumulative impacts of truck traffic within 'the general area where extensive landfill operations are occurring should be monitored by staff relative to' the proposal. This site lies at the intersection of two key 'streets serving the area (East Valley Road and S.W. 16th Street) . Also use of Lind Avenue S.W. over the freeway may prove more difficult and congested. during and following work on the Lind Avenue' LID. However,• it. appears that sufficient authority exists in the annual license for staff to require alteration of access to the site in response to .changing traffic conditions in the area. • 6. King County's Department Of Community Development (Exhibit #6) did not give the details and basis of the conclusion that sufficient industrial zoned and filled property exists in the Green River Valley to accommodate industrial or manufacturing park uses for some time. It is clear that the analysis is based upon some general data collected in 1978, almost one year ago. Sufficient accelerated building activity north of S.W. 43rd Street has occurred within, the past year to draw skepticism of the County's projections and conclusions. • • However,. the other contention of the County is that landfills should be disapproved until an "East Side Watershed Project" is completed. This recommendation has not yet been approved by the Basin Executive Committee, but is at this time only a recommendation of the King County staff. Until this becomes adopted policy of the Committee and the City of Renton, it appears.unreasonable to impose such a recommendation upon the application at hand. ' • In effect, the County requests a moratorium upon landfills until some to-be-specified {f!'i ratio of undeveloped/filled to developed/filled land is determined by future study. y _ PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER (SUPPLEMENT) PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION APRIL' 17 , 197,9 PAGE TWO Committee recommended to the Basin Executive Committee that no further land fill applications be approved until at least 75% of the existing filled lands are developed. With that definitive action by the Basin Executive Committee and the City of Renton regarding this proposal „ it does not appear that withholding approval of this permit at this time is warranted. C. ',RECOMMENDATION : , ' • Approval of the special permit application subject to all condi - tions listed in the April 3, 1979 , report to the Hearing Examiner subject to : 1 . Those conditions of Special Permit 063-77 ( copy attached) . 2 . Those seven conditions recommended by , the Renton Police Department ( copy attached) , except that hours of operation shall conform to 4-2312-6 (7 :00 a .m. to 8 : 00 p .m. ) . 3. At the time of site development plan approval : a . A minimum 10 ' landscaped setback adjacent to all public rights-of-ways . b. Of the remaining site area , a minimum of 5% shall be land- scaped , one-half of which shall conform to Resolution 1923 . • • Sr PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENT TO PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING rd::!!!!!!;:' APRIL 17 , 1979 APPLICANT : AUSTIN COMPANY it FILE NO . : SP-320-79 EXHIBIT NO. 2 A . SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : ITEM NO. �f'- �o �79 The applicant requests special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 300 ,000 cubic yards of material on a 29-acre site along the East Valley Road. B . ANALYSIS : 1 . This application was continued from the scheduled public hearing of April 3 , 1979 , in order to complete consideration of the potential environmental impact of this proposed 300 ,000 cubic yards of fill on 29 acres between S .W. Lind Avenue and the East Valley Road. We have requested and received additional information regarding the potential uses of the property and the traffic impacts of those par- ticular uses . Based upon the additional information pro- vided , a declaration of non-significance has been prepared in this matter pursuant to the City ' s Environmental Ordinance , and subject to further environmental review of each proposed use of the subject filled property. 2 . The applicant ' s letter dated April 5 , 1979 , discussed the apparent discrepancy between the previous fill proposal by the Austin Company (west of Lind Avenue) . The apparent discrepancy deals with what elevation should be , deemed zero feet . The prior proposal was based upon a zero feet elevation approximately seven feet lower than the U.S . G. S . mean sea level datum of zero feet . This is consistent with the elevations utilized by both the City of Renton and King County Hydraulics . The proposed fill is thus in the range of rough grades between elevation 17 and elevation 18 based upon the U.S . G.S . datum. The previous fill is also in this range . 3. The applicant describes the potential uses of the properties as including , but not necessarily limited to warehousing, light industrial , and office park uses . Based upon a traffic analysis provided by the applicant and reviewed by the City , if all 29 acres were developed in the uses described , the following traffic impacts would occur: Lind Avenue north of 16th - 1320 trips Lind Avenue south of S.W. 19th - 1190 trips S.W. 16th west of Lind - 330 trips East Valley Road south of S.W. 19th - 1500 trips Of the street segments which would be impacted by develop- ment of this property , the most crucial is that segment of Lind Avenue crucial between S. W. 16th and Grady Way , which is limited to two lanes by the width of the freeway over- crossing . The additional 1320 trips would be an increase of approximately 20% in the current traffic count (4275 trips ) in this street segment. 4. We have received a response from the King County Resource Planning Division , which recommends that this proposed fill permit not be approved due to the existence of approximately five years of potentially developable industrial land in the Valley area already filled. King County ' s letter indicates that on March 23rd the Green River Valley Technical • , ( • . , . ' ..' ' T:;:::i. ..,•g I ,.., __ • - )1:•••,..I.:.:• ,,..... 1, • ( • Lee_re, ..._ .<•:•:.:ii •c•:•:::: ; • m 0 g.. , A D vE W t.....i.i: .THOMA31p ..... ...., . 1 m • 111 ..I is. ..... .... .,3',.:., 32 ' f.".,,' ,>.':- • D. . . ()V."-, CO i":.: ...• • . -0 0 a X ...4:••.;:f: i:i';'. ' ,. ... , ,....-- Z . ,- _ M Fi4)"1 ', I.; I...% 8 z fTi::i'•i :::::-. . -. .. . ...0 . . ...."; i - . 111 - :•::: :I% .- . _ 346' • *::.: 1% . :::: •••.• ."-.. RAYMOND AVE SW. •• ..- . ... .. • , . .. ... .... ...„.. ... ..: ::.- •.... .... ... .. -- .. ., .__._ .• •_,SECTION LIYE ':.. :. .•.::': ''..I ..... .... ... ,... .. _ . . ----—•— 1138 -- - _- •••• .... • 1 i t•GS i'j 1 ' , . I , M i'' • ''•:::::. •-.-;'•.i m 0 $ Iii 1 sil • A . @ff, 1:::....:;•: ::::::i. au, III ,0 ';;•1 1 - • • • A • ••• •• - ... .. EENECA AVEi---- SW .... ..... .. .. 0 ' . "... 0...:. .1.W.:. . • 1 W U) '*'•A • co • 1 .., *Iii r to .. .„ ... c m ,....:. .. .... .. . rn ..... ... 1 , 1 • ••• — 1 LIND AVE S#.....,-.„7::: •. •.................................;........:..............: ..............:............,............, ch. _.8., -:.:,.i::1:,:,:7:7.7..,.:•...:.„-•,.:•,:x.,,,,,•::•:•:•:„.•,....:•,........ • .„- 1132. - :i:,:•:" 11 Isi .—:-------3--- - • . ..----,er,. .%•'..i 41 - - — .. ... - .-.. ...... .. )...•••....i.:.1:1•••....:::.:::.:••••..::.:;,::...i... ....:...::.i...•''...:....:'•...'-.:.....:°:.;.......... :1 A ,: „,' i'.'%,'% •:, 0,..`*"., .".;;',:...%''''''';'.' •',0,- li"48 ' '' '''''',Afft:14.:*1-4-:'••••'; ',.- -1-74"; ''.-."'',,-':,' t' ..'''''..,( br.,-,-,•••14::.,;.•,i,c,.. ..;.:1. , ri 1. ,•,.$1 ,F7i, ....,. 1..,::;v::•,;,„„ .•, .,,,-,,,,!•; :f.:.:f-,?''•:•.•:.14:...14-4,vp4i•Piic, i'.... , I P. ,,,., ...- ',-,.ti•sf....4",;.i.,),..-;•,,,,,..-v .,,,-. ;.: •• 4 .-,...::fm:,' 't1V-,,,44,,,.rettl'Af., : ..< 1""I'4' '1.11, -.:•,,%.*:"..1.-:v-tf!.:.., -.4*,,'..7,.,'::,,;,-.41,,,,A ''...`;;:.;',..-a!,..3.iz vi,,::-;5:14fe,'.4,. ' q 1 1,,,,e,„ L.v.,..,,,,„....„.. ,,,,,,,, .,,,.......•..4,. ,,, I;"Fa I,ii,tir,'#4.44. t•••,t„$4,-,..k.,'•411ez1/4. .."9 ' I'''): ': "1'''r474i1•.".;-"`4.-'''.."?.kr-0?';'•:4--'11.1 v.',,,,,,,:er-,::::Pvi-,,--1-4,ki,;..ki'.0::Irt1/4V-,4 33 •-...., .,.--,,, ,,.4,t. 'F.'Oe',.•' A'''..e.N.' `..':'.i'-4t.''.4 cl''''':'''''Vil;.(TWI*747,..?-*.(4,4'.;1::.`,,',,k ,,i. L 81 . •^::1.1.,, . .1',„,,,i,,,,,,,,,c4,* r„,,y,,X.L.'„:•' ,,- -.1-r,. ,,-..1.,,c4:-.1-1. A..4--81,1-4..,-0-641.t.:','-'1,:1-- :' -- Z -0 ..„,,1 .,..r .t.t pt_te.,...1 -7.,;..z..."4--,;',.:r,.-,‘,' `..`,„11,',„:„.-•'.:r.r rtk,f;,re ,,gc•Nt-i,"::.;•..' i.• ,,„,:,;-'-v: tz ""Vtr•t:i' ',.'.10,?,..•....,,,),,,'','"4., 4,..,--;1 :.4'me::-.•,%,..;,,,.:%: p 1,,r-tt,,,,;: •::,k,0: " iili: :'.::••• \ 5? ,'- ,:•,erp:- ;,,,,',., ,,,,.';'-• •'"' '.„'.•'1,,,.'.., ',<I:ny.t.'-';:1 ••,;:'',1,,-',414",.,„:-1 Ittii,..,1-,7-.'-. — / /I .1.:::.:.: :1 ' \, z --, • 0 •- -...•',, •4.4i',..',,,,••,: *:';',tio4,,%•,..-4•.::,1-'1,te,/:„...vis• ••;•:i;,•:, •,,- f,4„,Y,,,,,`Ltn..,".•,,",,, C.. 1 ''''. 2 VA ;.:-:*..:.r.: •1;•. 714 4., "' L.:1:',1);.,;:''', .."."-.11'.',11-:'•:,;:;L:1 ,i, ,1"*-.;;ALP,0'1.,•". ,' ''..,''',,.'fl :: ; g? ;I r 1 0 w•, ,, ''. •Vt;;14,,,•'- „- ',1'f.,i'..,,'..;.: ;.•4; ,.i 1,.*.% '''4`k 4.)44i:i.1:"4.„,..',..4,:tr '1,' . zo< 1 ,':,... 1.,j•;.;7,;,.,.•••;:..;',. ..';;•.- `„.z.'"f;., .,I,,,,;•,,z,,,,•„;, , „. 4 '," t47,',..-',7,,,. yti .i: ;.1 . \iNt \ . 1 0 4. 2,:, ,.., :11,---,,,„'-,-;.,•••;', ..,,,'., il.,...; ,-,:e.-,,,A , •,,,....,..,,,. .,,t4,„ixt.,../iv.,•:,,,,-; ,-2-,.. 5 a* .../ !i!:: .:.;:.: . ', '• ;„' "!..1 ',.:''''' j :' •",1,1;'';4•:,f;:LI;.,,,',-1-4t;,':;''.!&,'=::i:4 4•% I!P '',.. 'e'J' ... ' 1 a f1§411.::.- ..i:i' •v.;,z_t"'?,:::•-,..::7•',.q, s ::••;7'1",;'-'411t(„i'Irt4P.,"-X:7‘31,"' ./... 1.;S::!: 1 ., • -• ..,!!-1,. -..., ,_,.."-,..', ..V;.1.44-. ' 41'''..-• Vr";?''' '; ,t, Au".;,',...'-'44.,i':Ii4p.i:5,74 si — -,1''`- ''''' .'ft4:".11.::7' ;-..'W.1 :-`1‘:•. ,!••71',',.itiP'1, ;li'..,4-174v/Z;;;;'-,::::;„,•-k-...,,,,,,!:,••,';',. ;:. ! 0 ';,- '-.;•‘'-ii.-,•:'•z,,r,'''.‘e.,...• ,,..4,1g ,...),Nif'-r.. .-..4,fit''.45:# I /1../ Ar /:i. ::: 1-• 1.4:: 11;.',,k,'IV 411,4 .,,,,.,t.: ,,,t,:..0„;,:,,,...4..„..70,:•4:",-;14,44:4,:,..,',..:lit1t,a4,..#4,-4.„ 40,`,.4,,,7, .. .:,• / ,, .„.....,!.r.:.. ...... .x ..............:..: ...................... .... ''''si-ii.iii „ ' ''''''''''-'"...;t:, N",":,•!.;1/4 1 1° '-'•'..7:''t•t,'''''....k.'44•41''•7'•'—...-•:"4,;'• --:*''':::::'2.','"2.?:*.%)41‘.''''r'l.,.-;4%*'' /V-,';',1 L . /.../ . ,-;I:: .:,,,.... ;....iii:. .11:•:! '''' ..• N.. ,,it\ 0 •'/'''''''.- : '2," 4.4',04,..*,-!!„ 14,:tt,•;!_z•,,s•tr,.t.v..0-•.: :'.,:t.i:ckr,.: ,,,,,:e4-1,„,,:kl-fr••,...z•-,,7-,-'4 __ ,• // ..- ... ... . \, •, 1 „.•;.!;,... ,_, .4.1 2-. , <(...- ,,,,fit . .. . .. .. ..:',..:-:::: e-''q,-,1:'4:„,...:,..,,,,,''..,11..;t t•;:!„.„,„H`''.,,ir• ;41 vt,'••tk...,,, •••',--tz",.,,,,tg,',.''•-,,-••' '41.,g-?;Ify•tXt1/409-,..;e:: • / Ar. 4,':.'",--..7„,-It.„,'''',;•.4-14,7';,143;•"?,••,•.-eq,".!11-;::..14'3,4,-;.: !•,•-,'•-: 120 r---1,-,L,A.5%.. ;;,,' ' ,i ,Y. ..., .... ): . .. ..... . 1 t.',fs`5-,7,1•47,,...;.}.'-' .-':%Vi,.:`,L.P.';';'''," ...%-: -''''....N.'"„:,,i'^'-', ° At''',Ali ilk '''.!:4 ,S. ./ ..., / , ::': • ••••• .. .. ....:.: . • -,.,!--r-.4‘".. 11,42';,%,r;,t'4.1-",.!,-,-,;.;','.1%-..,.".'-''f-',•,;;-”e'r-i.1? p.i.-- ti Tor'f;tk%' •':' / i :C ".'''r''+.44::'' , ..'L. '.'l•''...f.:',':#-‘,14'.....4.ia.-,,,,=•••,••„,pi'1.,..,. 0- -- . .- ..'s '.;'''',.i• '• 'i,'0•41,'„,!,,,,;,•4171,..,;•,1„:,••.,„;<", ,.,f,„.„,..,,t7,4*,.7" 0 C 'U.1.--,,, ..'. ../ ii.l i.:?.i, : ,.../::. Ow '': "! ' ....:.' ....,,,./ • l'iii i':* ) \-'. 4 g n....nn.n....,,,,A0.............:.:.,7.......::::::,..:.,,,.,..:..7.,... ,.,.:::::::::::;:,.,.:.:.....i.,,..,...,......,.........,....,....,::,.:::,::„.,.::.,.:::::::::::::::::7;:::::::::,::,:;:::,;,,:,1":„,;„::::::7...,_,L.7.7::i..,.,:..!,t;:.!..1... •i:!..1..:!.:,:: ',.,.:.,.:.....,:-„:-..-„,„--•;....,:;•,,,,,::.,,,,,,;,,,....1,..:::.,:,:.:..!'7;',7:7-immui 0 ' r.... .'l.7.•VAT,,"-,`-i...° ... .,, .. ..• . ., ......:.:;.- .•.. '(••• FAST VALI- ...7.,...,.,.:.:.:.:::::::::....:.:::.:•.::::::;.::: :.0; „„:„....‘.77.-7:.:,.:,,.,;,:;:,.:,.,..„:77.:im:i,i..„,„:,:„,,,:,,„:.............. •••••,...,04.......... -• .::::;.:••••-. :.:*i:m•:;l .::::'•i:,•7:.?..7.i7.:74ii.e.t.-.-• . (7. . . •. .. . ... ., ... ..: • _.....„•,..4--zi•lz,,,,,,,p,,,44.0q: • ••...:,....v.- 7 . ''.-4.4,..,„ ::.„,.. :.....7:,.......:,,......... • . .. ... . ___ • . - ••• , .•:, :;.• ..i::.:i:..... .. \ ,.,„::::.: ....... . . . ,,,,,/,,, . .. .....• , -......... . ...vc, '.. ... .17 z \*1 E III 1°i I rrn :.>..., - Z 9 la Z ri rn n • I n'm lo „ . , - - ...,) I 011 • • . _ • \... J , 11 •! • . • • 1 ----' I I p' _ - l''11/: i I b �� t"Qa 1t.:7• isrd I 1 I �/ V--3 r' L W1 ld t i ;./ 1. r .\•j.`,b`�i... tip "'' I r 11a ,.� sr.�' I I m 1 'i LlI11111/rA,1 II R' 111 giL�b 1� �" �„ C C �w +W' ,"d-' II fly I A I0 . UD - 1t 110 ,, ast1 I Tfi .� I , `5 '@@ ; CNT�0uVIU.►G DL J Il e'IN fi NLl N _ , :111 , � I � j ,_ — ' . II{lAlI , 1, r ►` ! ��¢ " """� — . _ Y -7 I . kw. , ; m I _ _:___:._ , I �nar r; te _ - _ e h � • .: - Y I\ { •..wr" rj _-¢ i-� . L )AqI , 27-411,0! y . 1. i Lalfrot* 1 -_-_-.. - -= N. , I � � .,., ` � �T I 4�R•I +„ -� 47 {�T�; •s.Y....,pa. ^ - � ' P ((V 7 { .I I � -,».. 1'''1 ' ' { 4_ ; T1 Mir _ .;, 6 � I I ,, . T ba - <t r .r WIit,�" nfr " 1 W �� Y ' s5 ` - �:✓y. -.-41- --..-". 1: _ ..t- _ill--- -Z ' 11dt 't T 1' , ,iiI }) __-( 7 ,? atLT 7 D° ! [� L� - J 1' `V, '1t-r I ii ,Q try,f�'31Y \ -1°t , A ! ',_ ',3, ,_ i_ : .__ , , , TA ,,___—,41 ' ti, ' i .,; . ..-,_ -,,--, ,., 0 ..,.., , . ',..1 �:q1� _- + ,. T + � n >m( `�;�'•S„ +'� .,.,. 3 -- Y._ i _ AFT • 1' _ - — r II •e !e •B ,,•; Jr \e_,I 1 ,per - L — L t-z: A i _ 3, -- . 1\ rIt "''. y3y k 1 ®tl I ,s ' I�e� �j� ®I 'O ,• m�� 4� 1 k I -- _ --- � 4 - t {‘ it a ti, ;_. gel , `1� � 1 o • "`,,, (� _ e i 11 4119317 i 1 \ ° 1 1.4-1,1*-154 3.4S•Vk.A9 13'''',, . \ 1 1 .. ., ,....,, . ,...,v-,..,,,t, -1-,;„ ..,...,„..,r. . „I....1r_, . , ,. 4 LU_A a ..._i;\..Y'li 1,1 " 'L vs,," ..=-P. .,'-',./ . " a ' THE AUSTIN COMPANY; File No: SP-320-79 111 APPL I CANT THE AUSTIN COMPANY TOTAL AREA ±29 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESSValley Via East Road 7 EXIST I NG ZONING H-1, Heavy Industry; L-1, Light Industry ` Site undeveloped; auto repair garage $ lumber company to north light i EXISTING USE industrial uses to the west; single family to south and mini-warehouse under k PROPOSED USE Fill & Grade Permit for future industrial development construct.ic COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park ! COMMENTS J ) 3 - QnT p I�C�iYi AUSTIN N 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET iC�i3 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 COyam.,} -Ai`�Y TELEPHONE 206/226-8800 HV- TELETYPE 910.423.0862 DESIGNERS ; ENGINEERS . BUILDERS City of Renton, Planning Department April 5 , 1979 Page Two the intersection- of Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street 330 total trips west along S.W. 16th Street and 1320 total trips north along Lind Avenue. (See attachments) This completes our response to your request for additional information. Very truly yours, THE AUSTIN COMPANY Ralph E. Luke Manager of Design and Engineering by e C(J. P.W. Kosteniuk Chief Structural Engineer PWK:lk Attachments cc: P. S. Chiado • - • • ® THE ■ q r 1.7 g�w 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET Li4eL�idaa/i !Y'! 6■I�`f� RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 CO PAW(p ( TELEPHONE 206/226-8800 EE1'CN�i TELETYPE 910.423.0882 DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS • April 5 , 1979 PECTI"QED APR 6 i c,7d Mr. D. Clemens 41 ` City of Renton �` Planning Department City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Clemens : With reference to your Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner for File No. SP-320-79 , Section L, Item 4 , we have the following response : A minimum finish floor elevation of 21.8 feet using M.S.L = 0. 0 DATUM (U.S.G.S) is required by King County Hydraulics Division. Finish grade elevations will obviously be less. For warehouse or light industrial development which require truck-dock operations finish grades of 21. 8 ft. - 4 . 0 ft. = 17 .8 ft. , were found to be acceptable by King County Hydraulics Division and-by the City of Renton in past discussions. Therefore, rough grade elevations ranging from 17 .0 ft. to 18 .0 ft. would appear to be acceptable. Although there are no present plans which indicate the type of development, we would anticipate the following as pos- sible types : The 29 acre site could be subdivided into ap- . + proximately six 5 acre developments consisting of two Ware- house facilities , two Light Industrial Complexes , and two Office Parks. Each Light Industrial Development could generate a traffic count of 483 trips, each Warehouse deve- lopment could generate a traffic count up to 700 trips. The Office Parks could each generate a traffic count of 1032 trips. These assumed developments could give use to a total traffic count of 1490 trips at the intersection S.W. 19th Street and East Valley Road, a total of 1] 90 trips at the intersec- tion of S.W. 19th Street and Lind Avenue , and, finally, at ® - THE AUSTIN COMPUTATION COMPANY - SHEET DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS A�I LISTED BY PI'� OWNER /T'/4.T/q 0 EST. NO. CHECKED BY LOCATION .e E 6u T0so ki A SHEET 27. OF S CONTRACT NO. 19-5 l 9 6 'is�"44 Cr/c y I/dt C y S!Sj DATE 1- L ictr>- I/uZ1/S1Ri, L. OE VC.--. L 0PMLAI r jr (.0ARe14.t) se / 3P/1/C. '4) jik)6 I St9C # & gC>, S& rT o G/? a S ',C/..:,4.C' 9,'-'"A 4 I 8 ? .a _, // / —/AC( s /2Er U 0 J 64 , /62 ' sP4CES Avsa,;,,off,Ze 40o - 1 V4V-1) Lt. 7rr6";,! 5, 4G x GiG.1.:! _ 4 c s i(4,,r='.s — L /L'1:(' //_v. . • ,-. /,0 3 S. VE..mete IR/P.- 374 4 33 x 89 Y�J /0,2 T leiPS — uJ/9.�.E�-1 sue. . 9 \ o \. \,,PR P 410& / • - o ,1 i ./ / F: L LUG -26ox 340 4- ee 4o,;- . 1 t? 7 se ,,‘ ci (: • /� 00 M 0 9 N / . i / - Q, 9 - c G., 340 11° FORM NO.48 • • . F i 1 4 THE AUSTIN COMPUTATION COM "ANY SHEET DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS,/ LISTED BY �� OWNER /!L 7F`•,/ EST. NO. CHECKED BY LOCATION e�/' r"^/ 1,<j . SHEET / OF � -5/9 t. DATE ''';'• 7�/ CONTRACT NO. 7/ TILL pE2 iir -- T,Arri c 4,0ALv!1 N s,c:2_ .320 _ 19 T ,_,_a____itiv :1 it''- 1 - ‘ ____,, 330,-,,,,,, ciis ---,,,, ,.. <--- s,„ ,. 4. ....,,,.,,,L.L...-,- NJ 13ciP •9"(K;Ps 1dAX. 1/'LIB[ • 1/-)R2C Ho 0St 3s�Tkl,os- ---4-- . 3� i z LJGAir IIWOiis7f/AL L1xNT iiJ / TR'AC 44.1 4€3 7RiPs 4B J h tz `4j t n ^I - ` v I 5 Ma T�i Ps 1516'TAWS �!�' - , v 51(1' 51(4 `c--- Sw 19 tkS-rKtET _� c�f I FOR NO.48 - - 14°1b `�Qies ,)3r0 s , T ' " ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION _ , t , TO : O Finance Department krip/�o //\ 8 Fire Department ' � olioR $ � O� Library Department 019 ® Park Department \'Y//,, -'`'*- A ® Police Department �G b2 _ Q Public Works Department ® :uilding Div. ,, . - - •n'gineering Div. (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering' Div . Utilities Engineering Div. 1 _ FROM: Planning Departments (signed by responsible offi-cial or his designee) M alb/ /e (klaiti t/4 DATE : 1/6/1 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: APPLICANT : t! 77N ei• LOCATION : th 0 4540/4 , APPLICATION(S) : o *tiu®li 'riP el? re? , 4............. --keyekdiegAr/ iii. '<f IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING .. RETURN •ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : r Department : t e �., Approved ,J,;:J Not Approyjd Comments or conditions : ' ,, __-/-7 :7 ,'/ Gc---) --- :46,--e_ 1,t,, / ,/, , .„/ ////e, Signature of Director or Authorized Represents ive Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ! i 4 p c. L N1 c,)Nt FERI I ) C M Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : eon 5 i ct _,, ,/l0 ti c S9f o ";r _, d<<+`U u)r if c L lo r � 2r2 e�-1 Signature of Director or Authorized R , res-�.3,nt'ati ve Date h THE AUSTIN COMPUTATION COMPANY SHEET DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS LISTED BY 09& OWNER EST. NO. CHECKED BY - LOCATION 1 " - Tv-Q SHEET OF CONTRACT NO. 7.1- i 7-R A C A-I DATE orrie e DE v fC r 5,4cc -) k% 6X • 2 :2 :7)•:" 27 / VE11)(11- C (- 6.• •-.) 3 ? ›, c---; z) H . •• • • • • 2 e'S •/.3' LOG ., 1,4 Le. 51 Y / / el 2 5 Y S Sa • a • • 6,P s 2 e FORM NO.48 • • • I • King County State of Washington Department of Planning John D.Spellman,County Executive and Community Development John P. Lynch, Director PLANNING DIVISION KAREN RAHM, MANAGER W217 King County Courthouse 516-3rd Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 206-344-4218 April 4, 1979 prrafretx, SIP,; Gordon Y. Ericksen .. 5 L979 Planning Director --'" City of Renton 24/ Municipal Building NG DEpA�'��� 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Metro Industrial Park - Proposed Grading Plan Dear Gordon: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed grading plan. Following is a summary of the major issues we feel should be considered before a decision to issue the special permit is made. , Over 1150 acres of designated flood hazard areas in Renton' s portion of the lower Green River Valley are zoned for industrial uses. As of June, 1978, approximately 575 acres of that land had been filled in anticipation of devel- opment. A substantial portion of that filled land, 407 acres, was vacant. By the end of 1978, 57 acres had been developed, leaving 350 acres still undeveloped. Valley-wide, of the 2670 acres of landfill on industrial land in flood hazard areas, 1247 acres (45%) was vacant and developable in mid-1978. Recent market figures indicate that, by the end of 1978, only 226 acres of industrial land in the same area had been developed. Thus, the acreage. of filled, vacant, industrial land in flood hazard areas within the lower valley as of July, 1978, exceeded the acreage of industrial land developed in that year by a factor of five. In light of these figures and in the absence of the planned East Side Watershed Project, it is difficult to justify the placement of an additional 29 acres of fill in a designated flood hazard area. As you know, at its meeting of March 23, the Green River Technical Committee approved the following two recommendations under the Valley Interim Policy and Regulatory Plan and asked that they be forwarded to the Basin Executive Committee J s ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department 8 Police Department Public orks Department 0 Building Div. C ® Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Departments (signed by responsible official or his designee 4d ./ �( {1r +/ r'" *,1DATE 4 7/ V �r - `"fi PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : O. LOCATION : , _ ` `` APPLICATION(S) -F s` yy® ,'°e; 1, . `, . ` r f��',. vd ............... ,-.,,e,iiii,AjMyMe / WA?! IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING '.x RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : _ ',!; • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ai....D Approved L..i Not Approved "omments or conditions : Z/-/40,e0 e :7- ,d,,,, 00,6----x..._/ Signature o iD ector or Authorized Representative ate The Examiner requested a legal opinion regarding znis uk►..`4, �•• memoranda .dated Aug, 30, 1977 and August 31, 1977. -"xisting ordinances (Chapter 23 and 30) _ ,event the Examiner from 2.granti ra iarianceseems appropriate from the slope setback requirement of Section 4 to comment upon the effect of this additional setback requirement. The setback of Section 4-2314 is ertaes,ed to the•adequacyvoftfoundationsfoandhto safety and benefit of adjacent properties, prevent damage as a result of water r3 s t and runoff or erosion f.t the easlopes." (Section 4-2314.1) The purpose of Chapter s. . . against detrimental effects" (Section 4-2301.C) and to "Promote safe, of noc, systematic. ..grading activities. . ." (Section 4-2301.2.D) . Appl ic aftionuofitmi in setback will accomplish these purposes; however, it may instances. A moat could be created if the fills do not meet - a setback area r equal to double the building This ap pe area and at rspe ofck theoordinance. "protecting" each property. not to be The intent seems to be to require landfill to be set back ofromy adjacent - aapropertyr casef where the landfill may be detrimental to that abutting p Pr protection. However, in other instances nothing detrimental can n be sholl wn, but ons. moats may be created around neighboring properties undergoing it appears in this case that a variance should be sought brom retheeBoar todaofomodate f Adjustment. In addition, Section 4-2314 should probably a wider range of situations. DECISION: Based upon the record, findings and conclusions, the grading and filling Special Permit is approved subject to: 1. Landscaping of 2% of the site for wildlife habitat purposes per the landscaping materials suggested in Exhibit #5 as approved by the Planning Department. This landscaping is to be installed upon completion of the landfill operation. 2. Finalization of the storm water retention system and its approval by the Public Works Department. ,3. Dust control be implemented by water sprinkling. 4. Control of mud and debris ondjantdorn wa affected r dsh lic right-of-way be implemented by a mechanical sweeper ing. 5. Exposed slopes are to be hydroseeded to control erosion. Title IV. 6. Fill material will conform to the requirements of Chapter 23, s of the slopes to be no less than 10 feet from the building setback lines 7.. Top Fe established by Section 4-713 (D) (e) . • SP-063-77 Page Five 8. Public Works Department monitoring and approval of access and traffic control. ORDERED TIHIS 13th day of September, 1977. • _. �y` L. Rick Bee: • • Gordon Y. Ericksen 2. Planning Director City of Renton April 4, 1979 for final action: 1 . No new landfill on industrially-zoned land in designated flood hazard areas shall be permitted until applications for building permits have been filed on seventy-five percent (75%) of the currently filled and vacant lands which have been identified in those areas. Exceptions to this policy may be granted to applicants who use methods other than landfill for floodproofing or otherwise removing structures from the path of flood waters. 2. To the extent possible, local governments should utilize current market data on the annual demand for developable land in issuing new permits for landfill in flood hazard areas. We concur with these recommendations and feel that they are reasonable actions which local governments can take to prevent the premature placement of landfill in flood hazard areas before planned flood control measures are in place. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. • (Sinere1Y, t(2,," k /kaki \-D van tracy, S ction Head ✓ Resource Planning D1visior` DT:df cc: George Wannamaker, Hydraulics ; 1 INTER-OFFICE MEMO CHIEF DARBY 3/17/79 TO: DATE FROM: LT. D.R. PERSSON RE: LANDFILL APPLICATION The Austin Company has made application to fill a 29 acre area in the area of SW 16th and the East Valley Rd. After surveying the area Sgt. Saude and myself make the following recommendations on the fill operation. 1. Entrance to the fill site for the filling operation be off the East Valley Rd as close as possible to the proposed SW 19th Street. 2 . Exit from the site be on to SW 16th Street in the area of Maple Ave SW. 3. All fill trucks will approach the fill area by traveling northbound on the East Valley Rd. 4. All empty trucks after exiting the site at SW 16th will travel west on SW 16th to Lind SW and then north on Lind SW to Grady Way, then east on Grady Way to Hwy 167. 5 . The roadway will be kept clean of all dirt and debris "AT ALL TIMES" . 6 . The hours of the fill operation be either from 6 AM until 2 PM or from 8 AM to 4 PM. 7. That both the entrance and exit to the site be posted with the appropriate signing as directed by the Traffic Engineering Office. Two items in the conditions may need a little bit of explaining, the first being the proposed route. The reasoning behind our proposed routing is that we feel this route will provide the least amount of disruption to our normal traffic flows as well as it will also be the safest route in that it will provide a circular route for all the trucks coming and going and will not adversely effect the traffic flow. The other one is our suggested hours of operation. Our feeling is that in all fairness to the dirt haulers they should be allowed an eight hour operation period, however, by specifing 6 AM to 2 PM or 8 AM to 4 PM they will only impact one rush hour period. By starting at 6 AM they would be off the roadway by the afternoon rush hour and by starting at 8 AM in the morning they really would not start hauling until after the morning rush hours, however, would be into the evening rush hour a little bit. Lt. D.R. Persson PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE1tON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-320-79 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-438-79 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal The applicant requests special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 300,000cubic yards of material on a 29-acre site along I the East Valley Road. Proponent THE AUSTIN COMPANY Between E. Valley Road and Lind Ave. S.W. on the south side of Location of Proposal S.W. 16th Ave. So. to proposed S.W. 19th Street Lead Agency RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to s 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : The following mitigating measures are to be taken at the time of site development: (1) Minimum 10'• landscaped setback adjacent to all street rights-of-way; (2) minimum 5% of remaining site to be landscaped one-half of which shall conform to Res. 1923; (3) site plan approval per Section 4-2302.2.C; (4) any future physical development of the subject property will be further reviewed for environmental impact upon application. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plan '° g rector Date April 12, 1979 n re 9 Si atu < < City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 CITY OF RENTON, WASH'INGTON , rtrAl ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM -� .._.-_..-_.. .-.. .---- �. 1. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY r Application No. '',-36 - Environmental Checklist No. 1/. g�9 PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance ® Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance. COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires • all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you: Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which' will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form, being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1: Name of Proponent 77-1k AIJS1t,J COMPANY 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: SOo S . U. /G S'TieEE9" F/v roNN Lv A SW/AJ t TON 9 8 0 SS 204 - 22 - 8800 3. Date Checklist submitted MA 2 04 1 /9 7 Q 4. Agency requiring Checklist C/7-y 0f'/2EAn-s0 C1 {PLAMJA//AJG OE,'T. 5. Name of ,proposal , if applicable: a A.O/A.)ro or4 , 'JLL1 J P4eitfi '- 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : ILL 29 /a e2 E' SI rE IA) TA/4. /''/E Tied /%J ati.s T/e.AL JoARk -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed" to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ): P/Qo/oEie7Y /S Lo CATE'/J /3ETiu4EN Lit Sr vA LL EY R0410 AN0 L,i,o AVE. o v 7NW soaTN S/Dde bA- S W A , SIT Soul,Fl 7 o PRo PoSEo SW 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : `o , LAMPLETZ B r Stit.Y /979 /00 7o Comel. ra.•dY TOLY/990 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal • (federal, state and local --including rezones) : SoECiAG PE21Nir X'oe? 1C'/LL 'Aia A-A/0 CR4L /Nc • 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: 't/o 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: AIl 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- • posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: No TI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE FTC (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography o'r ground surface relief features? YET- MAYBE 1W (d) The destruction,, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , x either on or off the site? YEr- irkfir NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X TM MAYBE A_ Explanation: �.h) ANO LC) C604P4o/7,oM ho OVER e ov oewa of TtiE So/L s4N 0 et./A N 6 /N ro PO ERAFN L7uE To f94O/a/0 �ILC. • • AFFIDAVIT ; v RE�FIi�Eo ®� MAR 6 ].97!0 ' 9 ��v an officer of METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, who is �jN DEPP�� Paul S. Chiado , being duly sworn, deo- e that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 26thday of February , 19 79 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle T� w . , 11 (Name of Not y Public) (Signature of Owner) Donna J. Trulson Paul S. Chiado METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 800 Southwest 16th Street, Renton, WA. 800 Southwest 16th Street (Address) (Address) Renton, Washington (City) (State) 226-8800 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . • Date Received , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 PL-ANN.ING -DEPARTMENT 'PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING, EXAMINER ,PUBLIC HEARING: THE AUSTIN COMPANY , File No : SP-320-79 A'PRIL 3, 1979 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation :. With the exception of a few scattered deciduous trees , the site is predominantly covered with grass and scrub brush : f :v:egetation may 'provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: No water was evidenced on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : ., An automobile repair garage and service station are located to the north of the subject site and a lumber company ; light industrial uses are situated west. To the south is an existing single family residence and mini -warehouse presently under construction . The East Valley Freeway is located to the east . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :- The, area consists of a combination of presently developed industrial property and undeveloped land in the process of being prepared for such development. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12" ,water main extends east 450 ' from Lind Avenue N . W., at which point a 6" main extends approximately' a.nother 450 ' adjacent to• the northerly boundary of the subject site . A- 16" water main runs north-south on Lind Avenue adjacent to the westerly boundary. An 8" sanitary sewer extends north-south along the E. Valley Road approximately 1 /2 mile south of the site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . - 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route #156 operates along SR 167 to the east of the subject site.. - 4. Schools : Not Applicable . 5. Recreation : Not Applicable . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS •OF . THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-713 , H-1 , . Heavy Industrial District. ` 2 . Chapter 23 , Mining , Excavation , and Grading . K. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Comprehensive Plan , Green River Valley , June -1976 ,.. Goals and Objectives,. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : . 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff and cause an increase in traffic and noise levels in the area . However, through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated . 2 . Population/Employment: -The present fill and grade permit will have no direct impact on employment, however, future industrial use of the filled property will need to be addressed upon specific development. - 3. Schools : Not Applicable . RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT APR1 71979 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER AM PM 7,8,9,10,111121112131415,E PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 3 , 1979 APPLICANT: AUSTIN COMPANY FILE NO: SP-320-79 ITEM NO. o _ A . SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : "" The applicant requests special permit approval for fill and grade _ of approximately 300,000cubic yards of material on a 29-acre site along the East Valley Road . (Site development map attached . ) B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : PAUL S . CHIADO 2 . Appli)cant :. AUSTIN COMPANY 3. Location : Between the E . Valley Road and Lind (Vicinity Map Attached ) Avenue S .W . on the south side of S . W. 16th Avenue South to proposed S .W. 19th St. 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : ±29 acres 6 . Access : Via East Valley Road 7 . Existing Zoning : H-1 , Heavy Industry ; L-1 , Light Industry 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : H-1 , Heavy Industry ; M-P , Manufacturin Park ; L-1 , Light Industry ; "G" General Classification District. 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified inwriting of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on March 23 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on March 22 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1745 dated April 14 , 1959 . It was rezoned to H-1 by Ordinances #1845 and 1955 dated January 9 , 1960 and May 14, 1962 respectively . D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is essentially level . 2 Soils.: Urban Land (Ur) . The erosion hazard is slight to moderate . No capability or woodland classification . Puget silty clay loam (Pu ) . Permeability is slow. The seasonal high water table is at or near the surface . Runoff is slow to ponded , and the erosion hazard is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard . This soil is used for row crops and pasture . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' E PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ) , : PUBLIC HEARING: THE AUSTIN COMPANY , File No : SP-320-79 APRIL 3 , 1979 PAGE FOUR (c ) Clarification of appropriateness of only partially filling the site . Duerto :the fact that this information may not be available ' prior to the hearing , a continuance may be requested . 5 . The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department advises that the present drainage ways shall not be filled until specific plans are approved and implemented . (See also ;comments o,n 'the submitted vicinity map . ) , 6. :The Utilities Engineering Division indicates that the subject . _proposal will required water and sewer extensions and that latecomer ' s fees will be assessed . analysis , the Building 7 . In reference to #4 of they 9 Division notes that fill in addition to the proposed by the applicant will be necessary prior to any building construction because the 17 ' elevation is not acceptable. 8. The Police Department has recommended that access to the site ;, be limited to the East Valley Road and S . W . 16th Street. Other comments about debris , hours of fill 'operation , and signing appear to be very appropriate fn light of. the 24 ,000'\truck movements required . (See attached memorandum for comments . ) 9 . Review of SP-063-77 indicates that the Hearing Examiner, requested from the City Attorney an opinion on setback- requirements for landfills (see SP-063-77. for background) . The subject proposal is governed ,by the same legal opinion .. If the applicant believes that the 10' setback requirement of Section 4-2314 constitutes an undue hardship , then it will be necessary( to file a variance application with the Board of Adjustment. 10. The Hearing Examiner ' s conditions of approval in SP-063-77 should also apply to this application . - Copy of previous action attached. Additional comments of other departn'ents are attached .for consideration Mi. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : At the time of this report preparation , .the applicant has, not been able to submit the information requested to complete the\ environmental review as discussed in #4 of the analysis section . Should sufficient information be available at the hearing , approval may be recommended subject to , but not necessarily limited to : 1. Those 8 conditions of SP-063-77 (copy attached) . ' 2. Those 7 conditions recommended by the Police Department. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: THE AUSTIN COMPANY , FILE NO : SP-320-79 APRIL 3 , 1979 PAGE THREE 4 . Social : Not Applicable . 5. Traffic : Potential adverse truck traffic movements will occur during the filling period . Conditions related to hours of operation will reduce the level of adverse impact (see further analysis below) . 300,000 cubic yards of fill will require about 12 ,000 truckloads ; thus 24,000 truck movements'.' J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance will be required.. At this time additi,onal data has been requested to clarify certain issues listed in #4, of the analysis . No action may be taken until a declaration is prepared. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building ` Division . 2. City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . " City. of Renton Utilities Division . - 5.. City of Renton Fire Department. 6. King County Division of Hydraulics . L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The subject site is presently zoned H-1 (Heavy Industry) which will permit •commercial or industrial future development on the site . . The proposal generally, conforms to the comprehensive - planning and zoning . for 'the area . 2 . The - applicant does not have a specific development plan for the subject site at the present time . However , he indicates that interest has been shown for development on the site providing the site is properly filled and graded. Future '' develo.pment, will be subject to City o.f Renton standards including the Hearing. Examiner' s Site Plan approval per Section 4-2302 . 2 . 0 and the requirements of the restrictive covenants running with the land . _. 1 , 3 . An LID is under construction for the extension of Lind Avenue S .W . (80-foot right-of-way) along the easterly boundary of the subject - . .site . 4. The applicant ' s prior fill and grade permit approval (SP-063-77 ) ts located to. the immediate west of Lind Avenue. This previous permit provided for filling to elevation 23. 5 , this above the floodplain level 21 . 8 feet. - This current application proposes an elevation 17 , which is insufficient to comply with the minimum floodplain level of 21 . 8 feet. - r' Although this application will commit 29 acres of future ' development- in industrial use no uses are currently known , and the proposed fill does not achieve a developable elevation . Due to the size of the area involved and questions as to future use are unknown at this time , the Planning Department has requested the following information to provide clarification of the 1 Environmental Checklist : (a ) What general types of uses are proposed , and when development is expected to occur . (b) A detailed traffic analysis of said proposed uses . • • • _..../- I i THOMAS AVE S.W. ? ll \. ••••• * I Tg- 324' {• , Z. AN1 A j ril Z •L3ae___ SECTIONNE _.—_-_ "RAVMOND AVE SW. ' _ _ 1138ill • 1. I N • • `` t ep SENECA AVE SW -41 ul. • N iiii _ rcm . • a+ 1132' .. ......................................LIN® AVE § W. m ....... till1 3 , a} '1 �* ' s 4'y". _!� r,�s` . ,"{ ph�Z " Hof{ t ^ s,s, -•••,,',„ , r. \ � :•n 1 I .i^ � :} n�v* x �•. ." 1. l � p' n 1Y 4f �rcv't .QnY •�KSn dy 9Y� f�]7 ::::•,.., ..,:::......:. \ O �, 3�x�ti r�yA s<}q °'J rt • ia, p k�r*Kr ri'^'l a5z r a ,'fyr I:: N 0 ev It' yr" +1*" ',°"': * ,{t k v f,. '-. �': k 1 \....:: :'!r *s� 11{ 4 �} �. ' ',���' �.�' , is, 2. �it . . ' g$ 1 � 1 M ..1 y'` �'y r Xtw'.r,'�;4.'i '1' } c i"r rt, ' p • 1 $ '1 :� '\ 1 E S r.';:1 „C,N r��1?4r ;yc,rt' :A:;.'.... 'a ..,}' 1.5+ ,r* : 5. / ! '.l, 1 X. to x 4,,Or.„ as a > -, r -1 N ! 1 \� 77 .fit +f"% ' Fi'a 1' ' 1d' `+:..� _. r " Y 1' * �", ,"rf• ar mm r ; �+a tt{{ :•� 33 !. h //�� r.f L ( I A n. CD 001 syp+ 11,i fi § 'r �.a • is - r` I A, ' } y t nt: w''t 1 f r — •' j'• d `` ::\ `•'N\ 11 ) • opEY 5 * Flrr D` z r %� Of� f�� �Ny #f x 1 } •" CIC �, ram. �+'' � :: �T.-- `'' EAST VALLY ROAD 1 .ti_ wa•. `� 7` `Jr'` :? .i:i:: :::.:.‘,:.: ...,.:.............„: :. .:. ').'...'1'...)... • : • • • , %•(\\\\ss..., . ) L. Z Zn Im f • • PDiZ �n nAwNt InI I Im } n m,- , • • is �VI P — — a i II �, O Y , ,-1 art 1.9 1 i 1 e - 7 , v,...,„ , I �..�‘ \i' 1.��<a 1.: „,.•". 1 I r la I ' 1 \ r'sli'l' Olt ' 1 I I I / • � . a . mp. I r r" nna 1 � II -Aire , \ 6 NTO V . � ! .. a '-gu �lsyj III till I • /w I ` 111 i l , , , TNTQ @i L ' ` _ \ � _ R L. - 111I i1I ' N %� 4�I � 111 4: , II��i I. „\ �`� ` `\ j ,r(�"�jl , -- ► � I Ij ' , ( •-'- l� 4 y , -‘ . iSP I fIP '0IIIUI `t � ' ' .._ '=jj ° �t 1 f I •edU"" ; 11I iUIN - jlllllll n ,,; _ * _ a , • , r L1 _. . r t ' t• • . t s _— —_— y ___`Lam 1 to„....wr.... 1 ei � 1 t. ; � � u k ip --. .ca _.„ ,.., . -' -,...„,- ---,,,t,.,1 1,; : (�� { . t. FA Q x s'1'1 �Itt "•lZi=i'. ..__;it �,+� ,.;ks: -,, /.f - , +;� ilia" �. 11, I asU __ r;Ll L r-2--ii �y _ _ I „,.., ,___, a f _- ,W y n+ } y •t-r- •__1��" - ,,,,,......,c4-6 /' , a� 1 �i l :;,t .'•, • t .� L(� gyp,,. +-' ,r.,-. ,a .- � _ -ir 7_ _ti rr._ i 1. k o t� 333 4 a. 1 9+• s� -I f , i-,.'i_I+• -- a ,-~ .,.L- jg -- t---'mom t r '3i ZII Y +. .._ ;./6.41� '''esti —I ' , 11_ .a_- 1i ± l'L'•I• I 1 + I•- , t.if 11'1 9 •1 M111111 9 1 R. _ ' GSA •= a it - ,, , ,, !f to ,.o_ 1 1 �_ +-= •i- t_ 1 \ per.._..... ---fit —•fir' -- A.-.r 1 0'+t a- 1 , iii-----1.— Tilli....--:1L k \ Mg - 47' • - -.---- In \ *. 01..... ri "7 1 . \ . 7,i g , r ...'' W•" :,,,,... ••----Vt, , '-"..,',c ,..__.\ 4 THE AUSTIN COMPANY; File No: SP-320-79 APPL I CANT THE AUSTIN COMPANY TOTAL AREA ±29 acres r i PR I NC I PAL ACCESS Via East Valley Road h t EXISTING ZON 1 NG H-1, Heavy Industry; L-1, Light Industry i EXISTING USE Site undeveloped; auto repair garage & lumber company to north; light industrial uses to the west; single family to south and mini-warehouse under I PROPOSED USE Fill �, Grade Permit for future industrial development construction ri COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park ' 1 COMMENTS 1 f Ili It The Examiner requested a legal opinion regarding this matter in the attached memoranda dated August 30, 1977 and August 31, 1977. Existing ordinances (Chapter 23 and 30) prevent the Examiner from granting a variance from the slope setback requirement of Section 4-2314.2. However, it seems app P ri to comment upon the effect of this additional setback requirement. The setback of Section 4-2314 is intended to ". . .preserve the setback for the safety and benefit of adjacent properties, the adequacy of foundations, and to prevent damage as a result of water runoff or erosion thease lopes."and (Section 4-2314.1) The purpose of Chapter 23 is to ". . .protect. . . s. . . against detrimental effects" (Section 4-2301.C) and to "Promote safe, economic, of systematic. . .grading activities•• ' (Section however23it•rc►aY)be counterproductive in setback will accomplish these purposes; instances. A moat could be created if the fills do not meet -.a setback area equal to double .the building setback area an and 10to foothslopeese etbackhforrclinance. r "protecting" each property. This appears The intent seems to be _to require landfill to be set back from adjacentaprropertof where the landfill may be detrimental to that abutting Property protection. However, in other instances nothing ge-��e�goangcan be landfillown, but operations. moats may be created around neighboring properties f It appears in this case that a variance should be sought bfromeetheeBoar aofomodate Adjustment. In addition, Section 4-2314 should probably a wider range of situations. DECISION: Based upon the record, findings and conclusions, the grading and filling Special Permit is approved subject to: 1. Landscaping of 2% of the site for wildlife habitat purposes per the landscaping materials suggested in Exhibit #5 as approved by the Planning Department. This, landscaping is to be installed upon completion of the landfill operation. 2. Finalization of the storm water retention system and its approval by the Public Works Department. 3. Dust control be implemented by water sprinkling. 4. Control of mud and debris on adjacent or affected public right-of-way be implemented by a mechanical sweeper adn water flushing. 5. Exposed slopes are to be hydroseeded to control erosion. 6. Fill material will conform to the requirements of Chapter 23, Title IV. 7. Tops of the slopes to be no less than 10 feet from the building setback lines established by Section 4-713 (D) (e) . • • SP-063-77 Page Five 8. Public Works Department ,monitoring and approval of access and traffic control. ORDERED THIS 13th day of September, 1977. • L. Rick Beeler , INTER-OFFICE MEMO CHIEF DARBY 3/17/79 TO: DATE FROM: LT. D.R. PERSSON RE: LANDFILL APPLICATION The -Austin Company has made application to fill a 29 acre area in the area of SW 16th and the East Valley Rd. After surveying the area Sgt. Saude and myself make the following recommendations on the fill operation. 1. Entrance to the fill site for the filling operation be off the East Valley Rd as. close as possible to the proposed SW 19th Street. 2 . Exit from the site be on to SW 16th Street in the area `of Maple Ave SW. 3. All fill trucks will approach the fill area by traveling northbound on the East Valley Rd. 4. , All empty trucks after exiting the site at SW 16th will travel west on SW 16th to Lind SW and then north on Lind SW to Grady Way, then east on Grady Way to Hwy 167. 5 . The roadway will be kept clean of all dirt and debris "AT ALL' T IME S" . 6 . The hours of the fill operation be either from 6 AM until 2 PM or from 8 AM to 4 PM. 7. That both the entrance and exit to the site be posted with the appropriate signing as directed by the Traffic Engineering Office. Two items in the conditions may need a little bit of explaining, the first being the proposed route. The reasoning behind our proposed routing is that we feel this route will provide the least amount of disruption to our normal traffic flows as well as it will also be the safest route in that it will provide a circular route for all the trucks coming and going and will not adversely effect the traffic flow. The other one is our suggested hours of operation. Our feeling is that in all fairness to the dirt haulers they should be allowed an eight hour operation period, however, by specifing 6 AM to 2 PM or 8 AM to 4 PM they will only impact one rush hour period. By starting at 6 AM they would be off the roadway by the afternoon rush hour and by starting at 8 AM in the morning they really would not start hauling until after the morning rush hours, however, would be into the evening rush hour a little bit. Lt. D.R. Persson r CITY OF RENTON VN PFIt� ��o\,, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT 10,-": FOR OFFICE USE ONLY File No . SP- -tad -79 Date Rec' d Application Fee $ GOO• Ov Receipt No . q�i a 43 Environmental Review Fee $ P///•o0 APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name THE AUSTIN COMPANY Phone 206-226-8800 Address 800 S.W. 16th Street, Renton, Washington 98055 2 . Property location Between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue on the south side of S.W. 16th Avenue south to proposed S .W. 19th Street. 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Blocks 19, 20 &23 of C.D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, as per Plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats on page 74 , records of King County less lots 8 , 9 , 10 , 49 , 50 and 51 of Block 19 , less that portion of Block 19 conveyed to the State of Washington by Deeds recorded under auditors file No. 3916580 and No. 4554803 • 4. Number of acres or square feet 29 acres Present Zoning H-1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Preparation for possible future development. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other 1" 10' or 20 ' factors limiting development) . . . . . . • B . Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' on adjacent parcels) . . . . . . . . • • • • D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) . E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. 1-77 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department ®,ark Department 0 Police Department 0 Public Works Department ® Building Div . ® Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . , FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) Qj\IG eld#Cfir, ° � DATE : 02I2 79 , PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : lilt APPLICANT : WAI O. LOCATION : q�. j. eye /Amp At Ai' !o 8 APPLICATION(S) : 6 lAt,, F� 1 i —1 • a 4 , 41eAstm . IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : kJ.„,,-t-ts�--- i� ), CEO Approved Not Approved Comments or co itio s : r Lumments or conditions : ''� 3 -- / - 7 7 Signa ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date • ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Q Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department • Police Department ® Public Works Department Building Div. pgineering Div . Traffic Engineering Div . J Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his desig � ) ,a 1 , ' ; 'A) 99 vAvii3 e SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4 -- 44 Application No . : 1 9 Action Name : ' . to IN DWZIkL, Pi r - 13 S. we ' (501 il Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : #, 4 Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : °T & li d e• Gi g 1OP CP t ! SIGNIFICANT ►_; NON .SIGNIFICANT Comments : 3 .4S-7T Signature of Director o Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department 0 Building Div . . 1 neering Div . (Please verify legal description) e Traffic Engineering Div . 41 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) OF\� 117 C ' DATE : 02/79 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: APPLICANT : " . 4U*flitj 64. LOCATION : . . % . 4 tkib Ay APPLLCATION(S) :. OrelAt, ie l °'7 it 175. IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ` ilAFF0C, ,0/60 ® 4 ti= Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : comments or conditions : '. 3 r fi ...., ..gym.. 13 y Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department ® Police Department ® Public W rk Department building Div . ® Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) air i2 ci,,,tmiNDATE : 12If /9 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : Tit 4011d 011 LOCATION : .t• Im 4 ( 4 APPLICATION(S) : O ptigIT 'S- : plet 4 apo6 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : /__,-D —; EEIApproved En Not Approved . Comments or conditions : - / ilk er"`i I// Gdd,;( 4.9._ d G ..,,e, ,, . _0-1--_______ . 7--- . . 7./,'67 . . /1-7 /. . /7 / 2'6(1611j) --14--- 4g,e 6--c_ V:ZD65. - • . z:/?- s--?.?-7 C'-. ,(747:-&--7-0-----'- -55:/W(-7,X Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date /� ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Hance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department IO Police Department OPublic Works Department f r O Building Div . f ® Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description) \\'--- Ald 0 Tra fic Engineering Div . � QUtilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) 1II7 t2 C1)61460 DATE : v ie l7 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : lit 4u1k1 Eo• LOCATION : � . IAMD u 6 iv. Wit! Fo ll APPLICATION(S) : OJ/ L. WM11° ii —7 • piA, , 4 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX IN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1- ire EV Approved L1 Not Approved . Comments or conditions : ]- 1) 1 per' }v-ii.1" , Orq li I U ct._(-�< -.3 - 1 `2_ " 7 e Signature of birector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : .-Tk`-‘7-1 115 --pproved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : b C2-,/l i L 0 et,-, ,I"A r 7 W,,c_ Tali 62tJ,two., w ATfi n oL_S/2 ai ri,L iixrr;r-.nor<s 4.- LArfa.caF.1ao S PA4',K4, . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® inance Department Fire Department Library Department / Park Department Police Department ® Public Works Department Q Building Div. Engineering Div . ® Traffic Engineering Div . ataL4ID Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his desig ) �� vAvio � owAgiki , SUBJECT : Review of ECF- elge' % ; Application No . : Action Name : ` L, gl rT 402 10004 Piro .5 O Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : ��• 7 Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1SIGNIFICANT l NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : rI SIGNIFICANT " ' i NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department ® Public V rfs Department Building Div. Engineering Div. OTraffic Engineering Div. 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his design ) r 1 ', a 99 Aviv SUBJECT: :_ Review of ECF- 4 -79 AppI icatign No . : f- -M2- 9 Action Name : 4I i .4 60,116.--- 'c INDIaelAjd Pill. . - - 6. ukip .1 ‘50161A Please rev iew the attached . Review requested by (date) : 91/g 7 q Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPART-MENTS :.. Department : L� l } SIGNIFICANT ,Dd NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : . f « ems C 4to�c (j--//-77 ed Re resentative Date Sigq.a - re of Director or Authoriz p ,1 Rom\ �V CITY OF RENTON /7 D TO`�\ APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT Jo aEGF MAR 6 19V FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ti�G D File No . SP- 3 °- Date Rec' d. Application Fee $ gC0• 010 Receipt No . cF3193 Environmental Review Fee $ SY•Oe, APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name THE AUSTIN COMPANY Phone 206-226-8800 Address inn � _w ii-h Si-rPP R n on. Washington 98055 2 . Property location Between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue on the south side of S .W. 16th Avenue south to proposed S .W. 19th Street 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Blocks 19, 2.0 &23 of C. D. Hillman' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, as per Plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats on page 74 , records of King County less lots 8 , 9 , 10 , 49 , 50 and 51 of Block 19 , less that portion of Block 19 conveyed to the State of Washington by Deeds recorded under auditors file No. 3916580 and No. 4554803 4 . Number of acres or square feet 29 acres Present Zoning H-1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Preparation for possible future development. 6 .• The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2.307 . 5 in addition to the above. • 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks I — Planning Dept. 1-77, BEGINNING OF BILE FILE TITLE SPECIAL PERMIT SP- 3a0 - 79 TO FILL + GRADE 6ETWL- EN E. VALLEY RD. d- UNb AVE . ON SOUTH SIDE OF 51+1 Ito 221 RUST/ N COMPANY