Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA79-333 Law Offices John R.Allison Ingrid W.Hansen Jonathan G.Basham Mark M.Miller BEBE'TTS Frederick V.Betts Bruce H.Hurst Robert M.Cohon Kim C.Pflueger John A.Braislin S.Thomas Magnuson Martin T.Collier Richard S.Ralston PATfERSONTracy L.Brown Kenneth S.McEwan Meredith A.Copeland • Karen M.Sutherland MINES Paul D.Carey Michael Mines Lucy E.Eggertsen OC j�/jjj�J J Charles W.Davis James D.Nelson Paul M.Feinsod Michael B.Tierney A Professional Service Corporation William P.Fite Dale Riveland Karen J.Feyerherm Jack R.Wallace 800 Financial Center Francis S.Floyd James P.Solimano David L.Hennings Margaret E.Wetherald 1215 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98161-1090 Steven Goldstein Thomas A.Sterken Martinus L. Johnson,Jr. Of Counsel Telecopier:(206)343-7053 Jeffrey C.Grant Christopher W.Tompkins Richard S.Lowell John C.T.Conte,Jr. (206) 292-9988 Carl H.Hagens Livingston Wernecke Peggy N.Lum John C.Patterson March 21 , 1988 Marilyn Peterson Deputy City Clerk City of Renton Renton Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 t Re: Stewart Title Guaranty Company vs. Abitare Associates, et al. Subpoena Duces Tecum for Trial Dear Ms. Peterson: In connection with the Subpoena Duces Tecum for Trial that was served on you on March 18 , 1988 , enclosed is our check in the amount of $33 . 80 payable to your order. The amount of this check represents the statutory witness fee and mileage. Please be certain to bring with you the files and records of the City Clerk pertaining to LID 322 , as described in the Subpoena. The Subpoena requires your attendance at the King County Courthouse at 9 :30 a.m. on March 28 , 1988 . However, the trial may not start as scheduled. To minimize the time and inconvenience to you, my office will notify you by telephone of the estimated time when your testimony will be required and the courtroom where the trial will be conducted. Thank you for your cooperation. Please telephone me if you have any questions. Sincerely, le,"t4PVA,NOr Bruce H. Hurs CU " fr' '"qT()N BHH/lg JAR '2 3WA enclosure !��1; ,Li piet ;;;;1;:1 t 1 2 3 4 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING 6 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, ) 7 a Texas corporation, ) NO. 86-2-03067-1 8 Plaintiff, ) SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR TRIAL 9 v. ) 10 1 . ABITARE ASSOCIATES, a Washington ) limited partnership; ) 11 2. MANLEY & ASSOCIATES, a Washington ) limited partnership; ) 12 3 . JAMES M. MANLEY; ) 4 . AUGUST INCOME/GROWTH FUND 82 , a ) 13 California limited partnership, ) 14 Defendants. ) 15 TO: MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk, City of Renton; 16 MARILYN PETERSON, Deputy City Clerk, City of Renton; or Other Custodian of Records for City of Renton. 17 YOU ARE REQUIRED to appear and testify 18 at the request of Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 19 the plaintiff in this matter, at the following 20 location on the date stated below: 21 PLACE: Courtroom of Presiding Judge 22 Superior Court of Washington King County Courthouse 23 516 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 24 DATE : MARCH 28 , 1988 TIME: 9 : 30 a.m. . 25 BETTS SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR TRIAL - 1 PATTERSON &MINES,Ps. 800 Financial Center 1215 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98161-1090 1 YOU ARE FURTHER REQUIRED TO BRING WITH 2 YOU therfollowing instruments, papers and documents 3 now in your possession or under your control: 4 All City of Renton records maintained by the City Clerk pertaining to creation of 5 LID 322 , specifically including, but not limited to, Declaration of Restrictive 6 Covenants, dated June 20 , 1979 , signed by James M. Manley, and all notices of public 7 hearing and records of mailing notices to property owners withinj �t" �U the local improvement 8 district 3boundaries.l rrff 9 / rm1 ��` a 9 and to remain in attendance until dischafged. FAILURE /444,-e• 10 TO COMPLY WITH THIS SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR TRIAL 11 MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A WARRANT FOR CONTEMPT 12 OF COURT. 13 DATED this rt day of March, 1988 . 14 BETTS, PATTERSON & MINES, P.S. 156-2/14.-a 16 By BRUCE H. HURST 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BETTS SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FOR TRIAL - 2 PATTERSON &MINES,P.S. 800 Financial Center 1215 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 981 6 1-1 090 BEGINNING OF FILE FILETRLE SPEGIRL PEIzMIT' SP- 33 - 79 LOGHTED AT PUGEr DRIVE GRANT AVE . S. L�BITARE APARTMENTS (TRINITY FUND -2/ 11 /77 t*\ . . o • 4$ z BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS • RENTON, WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • 235-2569 Oamp Li) • 0 Q• 94TF0 SEP1e0' • July 17, 1979 Trinity Fund, Inc. 515 -116th Ave. NE Suite 166 . Bellevue, WA 98004 • Attention: Mr. Terence M. Westin, Corporation Secretary Subject: Deferral of Off-Site' Inprovements on Puget Drive S. , Abitare Apartmehts, 10500 Puget Drive (File SP-333-79) Gentlemen: The Board of Public Works, at its meeting of July 11 , 1979, agreed to defer the improvements to Puget Drive So. for a period of one year on the condition that restrictive covenants are filed to . participate in the LID or install the improvements at the request of the City. • We are enclosing our Declaration of Restrictive Covenants farm. Please fill out and. attach the legal description and return the original to this office with a check for $5.00 for the recording fee. We will return a copy with the recording number on it. If you .have any questions, please contact this office. Very truly ours; �Warren C. Gonnason, Chairman 4D �� Board of Public Works ® n- 3 � WCG:jt G��co �® �40� rowvo cc: Board Members %� a ��` ` ' i kkigS ty Clerk \,`"� R. Houghton i7 � Enclosure .47 r ,Trinity Fun9 File No. SP-333-79 • - DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENAi4FS • yl . WHEREAS, James M. Manley, a single man, • f V "----•"--'-- • - f . c.E c� + ' CJ� wre . the owner . of• the following real property in the City of Renton; rn `i County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' 0 . attached hereto. • • `1 WHEREAS,' the owner(s) of said described property desire to WN 03 impose the following restrictive covenants running with the lan.d as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish', grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors , heirs ; an.d assigns as follows: INSTA'LLATIOIV OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS • The owner(s ) of the above described property, their silt- . cessors , heirs and assigns , hereby agree and covenant to participate in, sign a petition in support of; and accept any future Local Improvement District (LID) or city initia- ted proposal , .and pay their fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. Said improve- ments shall include but may no,t be limited to the installa- tion of curbs , gutters , sidewalks , street paving,, sanitary sewers , storm •sewers , undergrounding of utilities , and s'tree't lighting. • Th,eeco.venants are imposed in lieu' of Section 9-005(6) its • . of'7.i.0:p. IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton. Stl 11 52 ►nr ' r DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- • ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton • shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach Of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of RentO or any property owners adjoining VD subject property who are a rsely1 `affected by sa'd breach. r 0 N es M. Man el,' CD • STATE' OF WASHINGTON) • COUNTY OF KING ) % • On this day of •� " , 19 /% before me personally appeared • • the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for ,the uses and purposes therein mentioned. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have .hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Publ i'' in and ffoi�•;the:!60.te, of Washington, • J . . 4. • i LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel XII: That portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 23N, Range 5 E, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the•West 1/4 corner of said section; thence N 89°10'20" E along the east-west centerline a distance of 344.88 feet,to a point on the northeasterly margin . of Benson Road; thence S 16°16'56" E along northeasterly margin of said road a distance • of 489.37 feet to a point on the southwesterly margin of Bonneville Power Administration's right-of-way as recorded under Auditor's File No. 3292927 and No. 3241106; thence S 42°35'54" E along said margin a distance of 1503.492 feet to the true point of beginning; thence N 47°24'06" E a distance of 98.20 feet; thence S 80°35'54" E a distance of 115 feet; thence S 88'35'54" E a distance of 109.40 feet; thence N 66°50'31" E a distance of 47.22 feet; thence S 88'09'32" E a distance of 44.2 feet to a point on the northwesterly margin of Grant Avenue South; thence S 1°50'28" W along said margin a distance of 265.87 feet to a point on the northeasterly margin of Puget Drive; thence N 70'53'477 W a distance of 90.93 feet to•a point of curvature; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 683.23 feet, an arc distance of 164.42 feet, to a point on the southwesterly margin of Bonneville Power Administration's right-of-way as recorded under Auditor's File No. 3292927 and No. 3241106; thence N 42°35'54" W along said margin a distance of 189 feet to the true point of beginning. Parcel I-A: • • That portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 23N, Range.5 E, W.M., M described as-.follows: • r` Commencing-at the West 1/4 corner of said section; thence N 89°10'20" E along the Ineast-west centerline a distance of 523.33 feet-to the northeasterly margin of Bonneville (V Power Administration's right-of-way as recorded under Auditor's File No. 3292927 and No. `d 3241106; thence S 42°35'54" E along said northeasterly margin a distance of 1352.62 feet oN • to the northwesterly margin of Bonneville Power Administration's right-of-way as recorded under Auditor's File No. 5178076; thence N 22°42'56" E along said northwesterly margin a distance of 296.08 feet to the southwesterly margin of Prosper Ethier Road; thence S 57°08'26" E along said southwesterly margin a distance of 285.35 feet; thence S 26°09'18" W a distance of 365.51 'feet; thence S 42°35'54" E a distance of 302.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing S 42°35'84" E a distance of 69.95 feet to a point on the westerly margin of Grant Avenue South; thence S 1°50'28" W along said northwesterly margin a distance of 37.50 feet; thence N 88°09'32" W a distance of 44.20 feet; thence N 34°66'48" W a distance of 66.50 feet; thence N 47°24'06" E a distance of 48.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Parcel XI-A: That portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 23N, Range 5 E, W.M.., described as follows: Commencing at 'the west quarter corner of said section; thence N 89'10'20" E along the east-west centerline a distance of'344.88 feet to a point on the northeasterly margin of Benson Road; thence S 16`16'56" E along the northeasterly margin of said road a • distance of 489.37 feet to a point on the southwesterly margin of Bonneville Power Administration's right-of-way as recorded under 'Auditor's File No. 3292927 and No. 3241106; thence S 42'35'54" E along said margin a distance of 1150.79. feet to the true point of beginning; thence S 60°50'54" E a distance of 94.00 feet; thence S 45°05'54" E a distance of 79.00 feet; thence S 64°05'54" E a distance of 69.40 feet; thence S 80°35'54" E a distance of 231.00 feet; thence S 88°35'54" E a distance of 90.00 feet; thence N 27°04'26" E a distance of 23.20 'feet; thence•N 47'24'06" E a distance of 14.99 feet; thence S 34'06'48" E a distance of 66.50 feet; thence S 66°50'31" W a distance of 47.22 feet; thence N 88°35'54" W a distance of 109.40 feet; thence N 80°35'54" W a distance of 115.O0.feet; thence S 47°24'06" W a distance of 98.20 feet to a point on the southwesterly margin of Bonneville Power Administration's right-of-way as recorded under Auditor's File No. 3292927 and No. 3241106; thence N 42°35'54" W along said southwesterly margin a distance of 352.70 feet to the true point of beginning. • u LA.U tor c 10(4 al 64;+4ut4: . , CTFf10E • ENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. • RENTON, WASH 98055 , OF R�� O • THE CITY OF RENTON ,$ z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A `O FRED .J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9gT�0 SEP1EM��Q . June 22, 1979 • • Mr. James M. .Manley Trinity Fund 2033 6th Avenue, Suite 111 Seattle, WA 98121 • RE: File No. SP-333-79; Trinity Fund Request for Special Permit. Dear Mr. Manley: This is to notify .you that the above referenced request, which Was approved subject to restrictive covenants as :noted on .the Examiner's report of May 24, 1979, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance: Therefore, this' application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date • for permanent filing. Restrictive covenants will be filed by the • City Clerk with King County. Sincerely; 7rLdi Fred J. Kaufman • • Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department • City Clerk • • • OF R4,, �� ® z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. QELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT GD• 235-2550 94T�D SEPSE�O� MEMORANDUM • May 31 , 1979 • TO : Fred .J . Kaufman • Land Use Hearing •Examiner. • FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director • By: David. R.. Clemens., Senior Planner. . RE : • TRINITY FUND SPECIAL 'PERMIT• FILE NO .• 'SP-333.7.9. • • Per your request , we have reviewed the legal,. descriptions . for the areas of this application which. -are designated GS-1 . The attached map was' submitted ' at an .early date to this department for revi-ew; and; although at that time the correct legal descriptions were' not available,. the descriptions provided by the applicant a.s a- part'..of. this application do accurately reflect: Lots :I-A., XI-A`, and II.I , I hope this information will clarify our previous discus- sion . . • DRC :wr • Attachment • RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER .11 NI 11979 AM PM 71819110111112111213141516 , ,, , ,. ,,,, ,.,„ e. • l i y �.sy �. F r `�� t! I i 1 p _ \„\\ it ° , _�� I I i sy• °SJv:• , ! y ' ! till , 1 °r• J I z� A\n o I. 11 . r 1 O `�y0. • F I I � I ° c� Alio. el • • I 100. r, _ S GS�St�s�'6 ` 1• +: n rec3. I. / t •,\Hsi•°. ,•., Alismerigaiimirr. --. ___ 1` i ti b fG 1 C •% • , �J • s;,\, ) Cpo QT/•'j�` e) • oA^' Iti b D P i., Y V S A�.S • Q t �� `� e ' LouCAA 1('C L LS -G •....� i..• �• �� r� ~ -..C. � L� N �sL- r�6 Fi r'A Fay s`1a 13 7 '�9�. /a �. u )��°?G �'''�', "'frJ•/sn..` AAate'/Vt -::5 • 9 �c.. °` � 31 wk ,� �, ' r • � ' --\''s....---:-----------------li\ — — — ..-.. 2 z Cr- • �) , , G N z - - - - - -- - - - - ._- - -.- - - - � 52.7 �z � y - — �_ — ,— — - n —� � PUGET DRIVE -i- - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- - - - (�=� �-- AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 24th day of May , 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. • Subscribed and sworn this Al- day of 1-'t y 19 . • (1, -\(‘C\ Utg Y..' - 1 Notary Public in and for the, of Washington, residing at?Re-n'con Application, Petition or Case: Trinity Fund; SP-333-79 (The minuted contain a tizt o6 the pantLe4s o6 necond) r May 24, 1979 OFFICE 'OF THE LAND USE. HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. •APPLICANT: Trinity Fund FILE NO. SP=333-79 • LOCATION: Northwest corner of Grant Avenue South and Puget Drive South. SUMMARY' OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a Special Permit to construct R-4 parking in a .'GS-1 zone and,to combine the density of adjoining R-4 and GS-1 properties for future multiple family and single family residences. SUMMARY OF ACTION: .Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. • Hearing Examiner Decision: Denial to combine densities; Approval • of special permit for parking. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on May 10, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report,. examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 15, 1979 at 9:22 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Site Plan as submitted Exhibit #3: 'Site Plan with staff comments Exhibit #4: Previously approved special permit requests in the general vicinity of the subject site: SP-112-77, SCS Properties; SP-123-78; S & M Investments; • and SP-097-77, Richard Moe (by reference) . • Mr. Clemens referenced Fire Department concerns denoted in Section L.6 of Exhibit #1 regarding absence of indicated emergency access in the northwest portion of the site; and • indicated concern by the Planning Department' regarding distance of approximately 320 feet from proposed dwelling units at the northwesterly end of the site to the designated parking areas. He suggested that building structures be more centrally located on the site with appropriate allotment of contiguous parking for the convenience of residents of the development which would also provide more efficient emergency vehicle access to the northern area. • Mr. Clemens advised that several sections contained within Section L. (Planning Department Analysis) relating to Engineering Division comments attached• to the report had been inadvertently deleted- from Exhibit #1, and include conditions Of on-site storm water retention/detention; off-site improvements consisting of curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, street lighting and paving on Puget Drive S. ; and installation of sidewalks on Grant Avenue S. He indicated that due to potential traffic impact upon Puget Drive S. , if access is allowed from the site, cost of improvements consisting of provision of turning movements including channelization, traffic islands and acceleration lane may be incurred by the developer. He also recommended that use of' the GS-1 zoned area include the' concept of retaining the power line easement for purposes of recreation as part of conditional approval. The Examiner advised that review of the special permit provision 'contained in the zoning code indicates that the process does not allow the Examiner to approve an increase in density; and two alternatives are .available to the applicant which include request for rezone of the GS-1 zoned Property or application for a Planned Unit Development to allow 4 SP-333-79 Page Two shifting of densities on the total site. He then asked the applicant to address the aforementioned concern. Responding was: James M. Manley 1618 S.W. 1st • Portland, Oregon • Mr. Manley advised that deliberations by the applicant and the Planning Department for. the past six months indicated the special permit process was appropriate to address parking provisions on the site. The Examiner referenced Section 4-2204 of the Parking and Loading Ordinance which allows utilization of parking space within the GS-1 zone through the special permit process; however, he noted that an increase in density on the site would be within the authority of the City Council either through approval of a rezone or a planned'unit development application. Mr. Manley advised that reduction of three units from the proposal would be necessary to comply with required density in the zoning district, and the possibility exists to reduce the density request if the Examiner will 'still review the matter of a special permit for parking within the site. The Examiner .advised that review of one of the previous applications referenced in Exhibit #4, SP-097-77, Richard Moe, indicates that the development was eventually reviewed through the special permit process because the applicant reduced his density request in lieu of pursuing approval of a planned unit development (PUD) . Mr. Clemens advised that a request for a legal opinion, dated April 19, 1979, had been directed to Dan Kellogg, Assistant City Attorney, regarding the subject application, • relating to parking, combination of densities, and increase in density beyond combined allowable density in the two zones. He indicated that although a written opinion has not .been received, Mr. Kellogg reviewed the matter verbally with the departmental staff, and his only concern related to exceeding the allowed density if densities were combined. Mr. Clemens noted that a written opinion could be secured, and suggested that the Examiner delay review of the matter until a written .clarification is received from the attorney. The Examiner inquired regarding the available square footage contained within the GS-1 zoned property. Mr. Clemens advised that a letter, dated April 26, 1979, from the applicant, indicates that the square footage required for 97 dwelling units is 89,200 square feet and the site contains approximately 96,000 square feet in the R-4 zoning district. The Examiner questioned Mr. Clemens regarding lot coverage requirements of the R-4 zone. Mr. Clemens advised that in accordance with requirements contained in Section 4-709. (B) , 45% maximum coverage is allowed for the building site area with 55% of the interior area required for open space, but because the buildings will contain three stories in the total building area of 103,000 square feet, the net rentable area contains 84,000 square feet or 28,000 square feet per floor. The Examiner requested further testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Bob Kovalenko Robert Kovalenko Architects 235 Summit Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 Mr. Kovalenko, architect for the development, indicated that square footage had been verified by a civil engineering firm, and the R-4 zone contains 89,328 with 35% lot coverage, and the GS-1 zone contains approximately, 103,750 square feet. The Examiner inquired if the applicant would be willing to reduce the density within the proposal if it was determined that a special permit could not be issued. Mr.. Kovalenko indicated his concurrence in the request. Responding to departmental comments attached to Exhibit #1, he also advised willingness to work with various city departments to resolve problems related to access, fire flow, recreational space' requirements, and parking provisions. Mr. James Manley advised his concern that the design of the proposal to accommodate parking provisions cannot be changed due to the topography and configuration of the site, and requested specific comments from the Planning Department representative regarding the matter. Mr. Clemens indicated that departmental concerns are similar to those expressed during preliminary review with the applicant regarding parking provisions and use of the power line easement for recreational purposes. Mr. Manley felt that although use of open space was discussed, concern regarding a total redesign of the project to, accommodate other parking configurations was not expressed, and he emphasized that due to the difference in elevation of as much as 20 feet across the site, access . from alternative parking areas other than that designated would not be. feasible. The Examiner suggested that improved access for emergency vehicles in the northwest quadrant should be reviewed. Responding in support of the application was: Roger Sartino Globe Development Company • 1900 Puget Drive South , Renton, WA 98055 SP-333-79 Page Three Mr. Sartino, previous owner of the property, reviewed background of the subject site. He advised that plans for a 97-unit retirement center on the property which he purchased two years ago had received tentative approval from the city with no comments regarding prohibition ofparking on the power line easement. He noted that two proposals had been submitted to and approved by the City of Renton by letter which he indicated he could, provide to the Examiner. Included in previous plans which had met approval by the Fire Department, was a proposed eight-inch water line extension 'from Puget Drive S. to Thunder Hill Apartments north of the site, a facility which currently has a deadend system and would be improved by the proposed extension. He also advised that water line and engineering system plans had been prepared and were to be obtained by ,a representative of the Utilities Division, but the applicant had not received further contact. He indicated his opinion that fire flow pressure is satisfactory in proposed plans. Regarding the Planning Department proposal for revised parking configuration, Mr. Sartino advised that approximately $35,600 has been spent for architectural studies of site layout, and due to the topography and configuration of the site, the current proposal is the most acceptable plan for development. Mr. Clemens stated that the question of fire flow was apparently not to provide water but provide peak flow depending upon the size of buildings which in this case would be larger than feasible to provide the required flows. Mr. Kovalenko advised that the building would be 'separated into three sections and because the plans submitted for Fire Department review were preliminary, representatives of that department may be unaware of the proposed building configuration. Responding was: Bob Hale Robert Kovalenko Architects 235 Summet Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 Mr. Hale advised that discussions with the Fire Inspector had indicated that building separations would mitigate the problem with fire flow. He also indicated willingness to coordinate all development plans with various city departments for resolution of potential problems. The Examiner noted the possibility of requirement of specific conditions for approval of the special permit request to be met prior to development, and these may include resolution of provision of fire flow, access on the northwestern portion of the site, and parking configurations. The Examiner requested testimony from a representative of the Public Works Department. Responding was: Warren Gonnason Public Works Director The Examiner noted that the proposal contains two major accesses, one from Grant Avenue and the other, which may require channelization and signalization, from Puget Drive South. He requested Mr. Gonnason's opinion regarding feasibility of the Puget Drive access. Mr. Gonnason indicated that both access alternatives would be reasonable, and off-site improvements and widening of Puget Drive to provide a left-turn channelization on Puget Drive will be included in the requirement. He reviewed the improvement proposal for Puget Drive and Benson Road which will include widening to five lanes, channelization and improvement of the signal system from the intersection of Puget and Benson to the entrance of the Rolling Hills Subdivision to be accomplished through a Local Improvement District. In view of the Examiner's concern regarding access onto Puget Drive, Mr. Manley indicated concurrence in restricting access to Grant Avenue rather than delay approval of the application because of the potential access problem. Mr. Gonnason advised that the general policy of the city is to require two access provisions from developments and the Public Works. Department has no objection to the access proposal to Puget Drive, although participation in a future LID would be required as a condition of approval. The Examiner noted that the Fire Department may require both entrances to the site from Grant and Puget to provide proper emergency vehicle access. Mr. Manley indicated his concurrence in the requirement to participate in an LID in the future. Mr. Manley referenced Section M.l of Exhibit #1 regarding provision of a revised site development plan providing a more balanced location of parking to the building location, and advised that through review by two separate design teams, the best possible use of the site had been designed, and plans are essentially complete. He objected to the Planning Department recommendation for revision of parking plans since no previous concern had been expressed, and proposed parking provides access to both ends of the building. Mr. Manley also inquired if the Examiner's recommendation would require specific conditions or would recommend review and resolution of differences with individual city departments. The Examiner indicated that specific conditions or requirements of review with various departments over matters of concern may be included in the final decision on the matter. Mr. Sartino indicated that the proposed building on the northern end of the site is located 30 feet from the property line of Thunder Hill Apartment complex, the topography is level, and would allow easy access for emergency vehicles at that point in lieu of installation of SP-333-79 Page Four an access driveway down a 20-foot embankment. The Examiner advised that approval of the proposed access may be negotiated with representatives of the Fire Department depending upon conditions of approval of the request. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. , There was no response. He then requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative. Mr. Clemens indicated that the previous recommendation for approval of both the request for use of the GS-1 zone for multiple family parking and the mixing of density in accordance with the plan would remain as submitted. The Examiner requested further testimony. Since there was none, the hearing on File No. SP-333-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:15 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: • 1. The original request was for approval of a Special Permit to construct R-4 parking in an adjoining GS-1 'zone (Sections 4-2204.3.C.,(2) , and 4-722(B) ) , and for approval of a Special Permit to combine the densities of adjoining R-4 and GS-1 properties (Section 4-722 (B) ) . 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, findings of fact, . and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official subject to provision by the developer of appropriate access, suitable screening, and necessary recreational open space. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-709B (R-4 Residential) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. The Examiner indicated at the close of the Planning Department's review that a special permit to enable the combining of densities of two adjoining residential use districts with different density requirements was beyond the scope of the special permit provisions. The Examiner noted that to achieve the density result desired by the applicant, a PUD or a rezoning petition was more appropriate. In order to expedite the application, the applicant modified the proposal. The original proposal was to contain 101 units; as modified, the building will contain only the 97 units which the R-4 zoning and lot area limitation would allow. 9. The subject site is located at the northwest corner of Grant Avenue South and Puget Drive South. The parcel contains +5 acres; part of which is zoned R-4, the remainder is zoned GS-l. The applicant proposes constructing a large apartment building along the Puget Drive South portion of the property in the area which is zoned R-4. The area of this portion of the site, 89,328 square feet, will permit 97 units (Section 4-709B(d) ) . 10. The GS-1 portion of the site is 103,750 square feet'and serves as the B.P.A. transmission line right-of-way. The applicant has acquired a long term lease to the right-of-way for parking and open space/recreational purposes. This portion of the property is to serve as the parking facility of the multi-family apartment building. It is for this use of the GS-1 property that a special permit is required (Section 4-2204.3.C(2) ) . 11. .'The plans as submitted by the applicant were reviewed by the Fire Department. They found the fire flow specifications to be inadequate and recommended alternative design plans. These plans could include using alternate construction materials or installing individual sprinklers in each unit. The applicant indicated that they have changed the design of the building which would SP-333-79 Page Five allow it to meet the Fire Department's conditions. The building is to be divided into three divisions with separation between these divisions. 12. The Fire Department also indicated that an additional means of access must be provided to the northwest portion of the subject site. The applicant is willing to provide additional access although the applicant maintains that any access on the northwest would have to contend with a steep embankment. 13. The Planning Department recommended that revised site plans be submitted. The new plans should, include, according to their recommendation, a more balanced parking plan in relation to the building location. The department also indicated a need for provision of more intensive recreational use in the GS-1 zone in addition to the parking areas. The applicant noted that the project had already been reviewed by the Planning Department and that the applicant was not aware of the department's concerns with the present site plans, but generally indicated willingness to work with the various departments for a final site plan. 14. The Public Works Department indicated that off-site improvements would,be required in the vicinity of the project because of the size and nature of the project as well as the location of the project. These improvements are to consist of curbs, gutters, sidewalks and storm drainage, and street lighting and paving along Puget Drive South. Along Grant Avenue South improvements required are sidewalks and street lighting. The applicant indicated that they would be willing to provide these improvements. • Because of the expected extra traffic generated by the proposal, the applicant also agreed to provide any improvements necessary along Puget Drive South. Access for the site is proposed to he via Puget Drive arid Grant Avenue. The Public Works Department did not anticipate any unusual problems if the proposed project used both roadways for access as long as improvements are accommodated per Public Works Department approval. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The special permit provisions of the zoning code are not.available to an applicant who endeavors to change the density requirements of a particular use district. Such a change can only be accomplished by rezoning the area with final approval of such a change resting with the City Council. In response to this position of the Examiner, made evident at the public hearing, the applicant indicated willingness to scale down the proposal to the density permitted in the R-4 zone. The proposal as amended will contain 97 units which is permitted by the code for the approximately 89,000 square feet in the R-4 zone. . 2. Therefore, as amended, the plan only needs approval of a special permit for the use of the adjoining GS-1 property for the proposal's required parking (Section 4-2204.3.C(2) . The code provides that no auxiliary parking can occur in an exclusive one or two family residence zone but transmission corridors preempt the permitted uses and no permanent structures are allowed in the rights-of-way (Section 4-2204.3.C(1) (d) ) . Therefore, the parking area will not intrude in an exclusive one or two family residence zone. • Presently the transmission right-of-way, is a sparse and barren property which would be much improved by the applicant's proposal. At the same time, development must be consistent with the public welfare, health and safety. As recommended by the Planning Department this GS-1 zone power line corridor can effectively serve an additional productive purpose; both parking and recreation. The plans though should allow for a mix of recreation and parking to serve the intended residents in a reasonable way. The Planning Department has recommended that the parking areas be located in a more balanced position vis-a-vis the building itself. In addition, the department has recommended that the proposal incorporate recreational open space in a more balanced fashion. 3. In light of the size of the single proposed building and the applicant's intention to use the transmission corridor for parking and open space, the recommendation of the Planning Department is reasonable. It will provide uncrowded areas outside the confines of the smaller R-4 parcel and allow space for certain larger recreational facilities which a building of this size should provide. The recreation and open space may also serve ,as a buffer and landscaping for this proposal as well as the properties to the north. • 1 ` r • • SP-333-79 Page Six 4. There ,was concern by the Fire Department .over two issues; access on the one hand, and adequate fire flow on the other. In order to permit the applicant to develop this property under the special permit provisions, the applicant must demonstrate that the public health and safety have been provided for. The Fire Department has recommended certain accommodations or changes in this proposal in order to permit access and fire fighting capability in case of need by that department; these concerns are legitimate. Therefore, in order to adequately provide for the public health, safety and welfare, the final building plans and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Fire Department. 5. There appears to be enough concern on the part of various departments about the proposed site and structure to subject approval of the special permit to resubmittal of the site and building plans for a thorough review by each department before issuance of a building permit. • The applicant should also take note of the fact that the environmental determination, a declaration of non-significance, was based on meeting the access, fire flow and recreational concerns of these various departments. RECOMMENDATION: • The special permit for the combination of the R-4 and GS-1 densities is denied. • The special permit for the use of the GS-1 property for the R-4 parking area is approved subject to: 1. Submission of a revised site plan to the Planning Department providing a more balanced location, of'parking to the building location. 2. Provision of usable open space, including areas for more intense recreational use in both the R-4 and GS-1 zoned• areas. 3. Final approval of the sewer and water plans per city requirements, per the Public Works Department. 4. Final Fire Department approval of access and fire flow requirements to the proposed site and building. 5. Provision for on-site storm water retention/detention, and off-site improvements consisting of• curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drainage, street lighting and paving along Puget Drive South, and sidewalks and street lighting along Grant Avenue South, as well as agreement to participate in any future LID for Puget Drive South. 6. The building permit shall not be issued until there is compliance with each of the above conditions and a declaration of restrictive covenant incorporating Condition No. 5 is signed by the applicant. ORDERED THIS 24th day of May, 1979. '"taV\CLILir-0,- Fred J. Ka an • Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of May, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Trinity Fund, 2033-6th Ave. , Suite lll, Seattle, WA 61g\z1 James M. Manley, 1618 S.W. 1st, Portland, Oregon • Bob Kovalenko, Robert Kovalenko Architects, 235 Summit Ave. E. , Seattle, WA 98102 • Roger Sartino, Globe Development Co. , 1900 Puget Drive SS. , Renton, WA 98055 . Bob Hale, Robert Kovalenko Architects, 235 Summit Ave. E. , Seattle, WA 98102 TRANSMITTED THIS 24th day of May, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney. . . e SP-333-79 Page Seven Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the city's code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 7, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not• be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the.Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection, in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : TRINITY FUND , File No SP-333,79 MAY 15 , 1979 PAGE TWO D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The natural topography of the site rises generally from northwest to southeast at 3-5% grades . The site has been sharply graded and terraced into several levels spearated by very steep slopes . 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development. 3. Vegetation : The easterly portion of the site (withinthe powerline easement) has been cleared and contains only scattered scrub brush . The westerly portion consists of scattered blackberries and medium growth deciduous trees with an occasional evergreen . 4 . Wildlife : The remaining vegetation probably provides some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : No water was evidenced on the subject site . 6. Land Use : The site is presently undeveloped . However , the easterly portion consists of the Bonneville Power Adminstration transmission line right-of-way . E'. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The general area is in transition from undeveloped and scattered single family use to multi-family dwellings composed of rentals and condominiums . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 16" watermain extends east-west on S . Puget Drive on the north side of the street while a 12" main runs the same direction on the south side . A second 12" main extends north- south on Grant Avenue S . An 8" sanitary pipe runs north-south on Grant Avenue approximately 400 ' north of Puget Drive and 2 additional 8" pipes are located in the northeasterly portion of the powerline easement. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit: Metro Transit Route #155 operates along S . Puget Drive adjacent to the subject site . 4 . Schools : The subject site is within one mile of the Tiffany Park Elementary School and within 1/4 mile of Nelson Junior High School and within 2 miles of Lindbergh Senior High School . 5 . Recreation : The Nelson Junior High School site provides some open space and recreation areas . The site is also within one mile of Tiffany Park , Talbot Hill Park and Philip Arnold Park . Liberty Park is approximately 11/2 miles northeast of the subject site . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 40709B , R-4 , Residence Multiple Family . 2 . Section 4-729 , "G" , General Classification District . 3. Section 4-722 (B ) , Special Permits . 4. Chapter. 22 , Parking and Loading Ordinance . RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER MAY 151979 PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM PM PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 7,819hb0,11,1211t2439415,C, PUBLIC HEARING ! MAY 15 , 1979 APPLICANT : TRINITY FUND -� EXH _i :T NO. 1 FILE NUMBER : SP-333-79 ITEM NO. 5' 5- 3 - 7, �,.... . A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant seeks approval of a Special Permit to construct R-4 parking in a GS-1 zone and to combine the density of adjoining R-4 and GS-1 properties for future multiple family and single family residences . Although this provision does not specifically exist within the ordinance , the Special Permit (4-722) allows the Hearing Examiner limited power to grant permits such as this based upon the facts and merits of each case . (Site development map attached ) . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1. Owner of Record : ' JAMES M , MANLEY 2 . Applicant : TRINITY FUND 3. Location : NW corner of Grant Avenue South (Vicinity map attached) and Puget Drive South 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : ±5 acres 6. Access : Via Grant Avenue South _and Puget Drive South 7 . Existing Zoning : GS-1 , General Classification District ; minimum lot size of 35 ,000 square feet ; R-4 , Residence Multiple Family , minimum lot size of 5 ,000 square feet 8 . Existing Zoning in the, Area : R-4 , GS-1 , B-1 , Business Use . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : High Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writ- ing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on May 4 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on May 3 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by ordinance #1871 dated March 8, 1961 . The westerly portion of the property (the R-4 section ) was rezoned to R-4 from GS-1 by Ordinance 2059 dated October 21 , 1963 . The GS- 1 zoning of the powerline are proposed for use as parking and open space areas for this development has existed since annexation to provide generally for perpetual open space . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : TRINITY FUND , File No SP-333-.79 MAY 15 , 1979 PAGE FOUR 3 . The proposed multi-family buildings are consistent with the lot coverage limits and setback requirements of the R-4 zone with the exception that parking is proposed to be handled within the adjoining GS-1 zoned property below the power lines . 4 . Calculations submitted by the applicant indicate a site area of ±129 , 955 square feet in the GS-1 zone . Based upon this figure , the request is for 4 dwellings to be allowed for this portion , (based upon one home per 35 ,000 square feet) , Planning Department calculations show a site area of ±106 ,651 square feet based upon the submitted drawings and maximum number of 3 lots . If the applicant desires to have 4 units, a complete set of calculations should be required for verification . For the multiple family or R-4 zoned area , the applicant ' s figure and request for an additional unit are consistent with staff figures . 5 . Utilities are available to the subject site . However , the Utilities Engineering Division notes a special problem exists regarding adequate fire flow from the existing water main . Sewer and water plans will have to be submitted and approved and standard hook-up fees for both will apply. 6. The Fire Department advises that the proposed multiple family structures are too large to meet fire flow requirements of the Uniform Fire Code . After further discussion with department officials , it was recommended by Fire that an alternative construction material or installation of sprinklers in individual units be considered in order to meet the UFC requirements . Concern was also expressed about the absence of any indicated emergency access , particularly regarding the northwest portion of the site . Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration . M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of that portion of the special permit to combine density of 101 dwelling units of the GS-1 zoned area and the R-.4 areas and recommend approval of the use of GS-1 zoned area for parking and open space . 1 . Provision of a revised site development plan providing a more balanced location of parking to the building location . 2 . Provision of usable open space areas in both the R-4 and GS-1 zoned areas such as between parking bays , and along the perimeter of the buildings to consist of lawn areas or perimeter landscaped play courts . 3 . Applicant shall provide verifying calculations for lot area of the GS- 1 zoned portion of the site to substantiate the proposed 4 unit density of this area . 4. Final Public Works Department approval of sewer and water plans per City ordinance requirements . 5 . Final Fire. Department approval of access and fire flows to the proposed structure . 6. Provision of street improvements in the vicinity of the Puget Drive access drive such as , but not necessarily limited to turning lanes , acceleration/deacceleration provisions , and traffic islands . 7 . Final Public Works Department approval of plans for off-site improve ments per L- 10 and in accordance with ordinance provisions . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : TRINITY FUND , File No SP-333,79 MAY 15 , 1979 PAGE THREE H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , pages 17 and 18 . 2. Policy Statement , Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan ; Section #4B (Density Plan) . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will disturb the soils , remove the vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and increase traffic and noise levels in the area . However , through proper development controls and procedures , many of these impacts can be, mitigated. 2 . Population/Employment: The proposed 101 unit project will increase the area population by approximately 250 persons (2 . 5 persons/unit times 101 units ) . Regarding public services the Fire Department indicates that ;the proposed structure is too large to meet fire flow requirements . 3. Schools : This proposal will increase the school population by approximately 25 pupils ( . 25 students/unit times 101 units ) . These students will be scattered throughout the grade levels and should not significantly affect the existing facilities . 4. Social : Construction of the proposed units will increase the area population and thereby provide additional opportunities for social interaction among the area residents . 5 . Traffic : The proposed development will increase traffic in the vicinity by approximately 620 trips per day (6 . 1 trips/unit times 101 units ) . Current traffic on Puget Drive will be increased by 6% above the current 9300 trips per day . J . ENVIRONMENTAL .ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of. Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended RCW-43-21C , a declaration of environmental non-significance has been prepared subject to provision by the developer of appropriate access , suitable screening , and necessary recreational open space . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. 6 . City of Renton Parks Department . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The dwelling uses planned by the applicant are generally consistent with those permitted in the respective zones and provided for by the Comprehensive Plan . The proposed special permit approval is consistent with the approval of the Thunder Hill Apartments to the north which provided for recreational /open space uses and limited parking under the power lines . The' special permit approval is consistent with approval of density mixes on the east side of Grant between Puget and S . 18th . 2 . The proposed uses are compatible with the existing uses in the immediate area and vicinity apartments and condominiums . Single family dwellings to the east are currently buffered by approved developments east of Grant Avenue South . / , b 1�9t18� /� - a ,. .! 1 i I •. • II LJ 1!1 13.81 •1 p�•f 1 t) - ii,I 1 I /J•� t, , a �� discs 1 r n :• �� i I O • I 4 7 1► O ir Y •4 s t_ 1 ' I ' .I l !,, sari 1 __ • i 6, ‘• •'• 1 \i.' ' . ' !' .','''' „s •' Li i n____..\\ . ••••• ' •?DVS • 't } i 11.4.--ii, vg.-. . A. i0 - :i 1 -.\- '1 1 \� ,.t 5a /� • --„vet,. /O .. tz „ V,. f •Ti�l f:JY •'- �� \ �,t` :, ,,, ,- , r , ; '• ® 1`i 1 H.`iMG6f Sd .CJ . �.�-j. , .,1 ~„ - - -. a I� _ • • ' 1,1 I r Y' .. , ;el. .."1 3� •! }�# u a \ �< \ , . �. �� . _ �w}� 1 IT 0 , n1 N as 7 ' bt11MM1l • A al II \•to 9 i _ ;iL si \ 1 II.I I1 „j „ :, d —_ ; , . t• Q tom r• gym. ? 'l w—z,i 1 , , 1i'I R-‘k,.l'3i*" s ZIlL ..-- ' 33 •I' 14 .6'4 1 .. 449 0 F L—I e,. r v.0 �� •vow ____:__ = ===_ _�° — _ , , --- it tp( ° is,. .s.\ `. ,k ' lio I I G �'2 , ID »l ql,. © I 1 , • \\\ ,� j I • • H �,41 V ail%OW I . •teto � r.: -1 0 •t�7--7Tr " A) ,1y1.�yµMr ` 1 U t .T• /f7�� L L r .—... -6t 2 `ispow �C Y.. i� 1. —r „, I___ \ 1 1 ? TRINITY FUND (Abitare Apartments ) SP-333-79 APPLICANT TRINITY FUND TOTAL AREA +5 arrps_ PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Grant Avenue South and Puget Drive South GS-1 ; R-4 EXISTING ZONING t 1 Site presently undeveloped EXISTING USE FUTURE MULTIPLE FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES } PROPOSED USE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN High Density Multiple Family COMMENTS 1 h i . ,. . ___ Apc l(3 ,,.'4, „.- • v,- *trelltaft?,e,i7k. ' ' i -.A 1, liCte, Iti,44.Z WO ' //_. fkrPi . 2220 ounnalm aVeo Qo P �� 19 )19 Q o tto e 9 wa o 9.o 'i02 0 C 4 .. '' 206 0 ) 797 `INNING 0,e% , 1 ABITARE APARTMENTS APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT • To Whom it May Concern:. = • The Trinity Fund is, with the accompanying application and develop- ment plans, applying for a special permit as required based on the - • following circumstances : 1. The proposed parking on a S-1 Zone ( leased from B,.P.A.,) and 2 . •The proposed increase in lot density from the maximum of 96 to 102 units. First , regarding the parking situation . Development of the B.P.A. land with berms and generous landscaped areas along with our com- mitment to maintenance will be an improvement to what is .presently • an unnaturally graded and barren site. • Regarding the density . While the proposed density is six units above the allowable under present zoning, the proposal is ' not ' detrimental in terms of the open space, does not increase the environmental' impact •and we trust does not conflict with the goals I set by the ,.planning department. We can see no significant benefit in deleting the six units . Admittedly our strongest motive for the application is purely out of hardship since the property was bought and the plans prepared . under assurances made by the previous owners that the proposal was legal and in compliance with city ordinances an d. codes. The Trinity Fund .has made a heavy investment of their time and in the expense of the Architects and Consultants and at this point the feasibility of this project without these exceptions being approved is doubtful. We hope that without specific objection from the community ,the proposal ' can be approved without unnecessary' delays: • • ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : o Finance Department Fire Department Library Department QPark Department OPolice Department Q Public Works Department O wilding Div. Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his desig nee) geecif6,v 6 DATE : 1/;141/41 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 7 1*'Tf/ 4g/0 LOCATION : 1r 4 'i APPLICATION(S) : f• / :/ -44,16 iwillgYffwerigil ,ei „,„ • IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING X RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : F-7--7- ,1"._-Pe -- , [2:1 Approved ED Not Approved Comments or conditions : I) 6 n . df cl e 71-ej `/" -z Signatu e of Director r A t rized Representative Date • • • • . • ct c.,N1',A . ' mye` r* i '. � ' Y } y sir ..Y.. • 1 -N ()J F« 'di Zi" rid., d4, / ,,'''1, K y IOW[ 4" .. g I ,a4 1 : . w • Oil.1.1..' ., , ,,, . , ' '41-' ' .' •Nr('''',-"...'..1. ) "2- '; ' it er Y ;1 1 �y, o .: "'; 7 7 r ta, • I D } I 1 ;«; • , 14ii .1 �,y p: , . # — ' • • e, . '•/ ' ';` '..1.'. .'k ::- '`,,--' ' .. .• ./'. .1.... ''' ..: A s••?..) 'I , r . ., , ,...r.... ,. 1. . ,. . r . .fe,.y . .. .„ , .‘ ,... ... , ., 1 .... .% 1 . .. .. .,.. (4 ...„ . • . . ... ,, , .,. \\ \,... ,„ . . . , ,. :, 3., ..‘ , � } . ,: r /. • y ' • ' • ; n � . 1 4 � 1t ,, , l�f ' I • � , A •-% , '., * , 14 litt • Y.., s .\.: q p ,.. �1 �� r 5 i 1 , , r ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: (:) Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department • Public Works Department Building Div . Engineering Div . OTraffic Engineering Div . Q Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) � /16 • Application ication No . : SUBJECT : Review of ECF- PP E Action Name : d#1.14e5 j ;a Please review the attache . Review requested by (date) : 0 / Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : SIGNIFICANT JIB-INON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Di ector or Authorized Representative ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De artment : _ o �. r' i- C—% C f= 1i IGNIFICANT I I NON SIGNIFICANT Co ments : eZ:2, ‘? . /:"1"e e//r2 /777 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY % --.PARTMENTS : Department : !.� l_ (I_Approved En Not •Approved • . Comments or conditions : l • • S gnature _of Director' or Authorihed Representative / ate" 2/ REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • • •.- Department : 11 ; A- ITT-IL J] Approved • ' ® Not Approved . Comments or-•condi tions : . { ////77 • GTE-r..lJ1, � ,`�, j,-/lG��.-._....^• Signature 'of Director or Authorized Representative ' Date . ; REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : /c T /7 / 'iic 7/ ) 7 • [] Approved of Approved Comments or conditions : -, -- ,_51.,/L/0/ti� Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentative ,. ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : I TWTY f%Or m- Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : cs6-G w-aftV) es01 APp;to0E0 aeat er) VEuAC loRotu — k'fe(12E4a2fo Fii1 tr-6OL1 •p 1/ S . Fr o s'. C.Fla'Ct. V./Ara/L. A PPaJA? 3 cE.iu.' A-4 fit: a Rc3� Signature of- Director' or Authorized Representative Date 9 PROPOSED/FINAL CLARATION' OF SIGNIFICANCE' ')N-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-333-79 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-454-79 EX FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant_ seeks approval of a Special Permit to construct R-4 parking in a GS_1 zone and to combine the density of adjoining R-4 and GS- 1 properties for future'multiple family and single family residen- ces . Proponent TRINITY FUND Location of Proposal NW corner of Grant Avenue So and Puget Drive So. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPT. --_ This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is ® is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : A declaration of non-signficance has been prepared subject to provision by the developer of appropriate access, suitable screening, and necessary recreational open space. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an , extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non- significance : -- Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN T i tl e PLANNING IREC R _ Date MAY 10, 1979 Signature ._ City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De tment : ' SIGNIFICANT I I NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : j�/ 13CI%-O//_,J 73£ L / G 1 - Signature of Director or Authori ed Representative / ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : SIGNIFICANT ' i NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (� 1 SIGNIFICANT 'Yu NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signat"ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date �� 1 `1I I � /o-4 _ 4 5 I lJ 17J 'Him I'I-1.,- f V: 1 � I P ins I i I-� ) ; —I I �i.. 15 ` fit`E:1.O:, 17 24 IY.1 .E ' I I I I • / 6. r IIIIIIIIIIIII.'1Un •-, I 1 H- I ----- IIIIIIIII ,/ ` ' • /.;��.IIIII v L� I 1\I\\ \,\ 6.QENT04 VILLI.GE PL '� `—�— . R OM 4 • • ��... .,_:— � � \ is=� '/ J 416 —_____. _— ...4t. 4 rkiv s , ILE ,....oh• " e -pl.-, . ,... 4,1w,sk _____, i 0/ A. Mir#,. "it- ittlf.ii., :._ ti;Alli. B.1 RIOPPIPP. 1 = '.\\'\, 1 / A AI ii -.1. whit? .ii 4 A. w ', 107APPIPP-- . .._._ mi,ong- 7-- ...! i .4 a 1 , . Rol ?Obeli! .a i ca IE i „,, pilk\-...s.,,,,,, , ., TO 7 101 117 :__1_4_,, hi,,.' ' .. .4 I— .-.- (\\ ' . Iffiri MIM --- _ _•:H 'o,i - --->��Q MI II- • 8i • to - • • .Zt y W--, d > f y • ` '- - ----C—• tk .4- MI 4411111113111"11. R...1 'Illk\P„..:1/ 7.—=--- milmo --A IleirM.d. E • • - 17 IS ' f tS • i 7i . 310 z _ to J.fit ,. ; �� —,y`. -\ 11 :•� % -fr 10 ME F \,, • 1 \ L-1 • n • I s ry 4,iI>r' 0 i "= I(G-9 . 00 I EI 6 9 , f ri G=7-200 _ oo r- •A, IK IS IN,' �©euti4b 1 . _ • IB .1 �i21 S i 41 ��7� 'RN aT._-. 1 lE M m• 6 27TN �1s�yy H : \I\V L. IT/18 19 'w.e .•0 ba. lOfide 7 to •at S�— ' ri TN > • • 1 -'41'••71.•' , - -----\72,929; • !• \/I G 11\1 I `' ILIA P 11111 • ._ . . _ .. GAL-E 11.1-- 0 . M/ . ::_NORTH • , • •..=AF71T1 AFT , .. . -j asao pu -1' .pRIV� • • _ • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : TRINITY FUND , File No SP-333-79 MAY 15 , 1979 PAGE TWO D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography: The natural topography of the site rises generally from northwest to southeast at 3,5% grades , The site has been sharply graded and terraced into several levels spearated by very steep slopes . 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development, 3 . Vegetation : The easterly portion of the site (withinthe powerline easement) has been cleared and contains only scattered scrub brush . The westerly portion consists of scattered blackberries and medium growth deciduous trees with an occasional evergreen . 4 . Wildlife : The remaining vegetation probably provides some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : No water was evidenced on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : The site is presently undeveloped . However , the easterly portion consists of the Bonneville Power Adminstration transmission line right-of-way . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The general area is in transition from undeveloped and scattered single family use to multi-family dwellings composed of rentals and condominiums . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 16" watermain extends east-west on S . Puget Drive on the north side of the street while a 12" main runs the same direction on the south side . A second 12" main extends north- south on Grant Avenue S . An 8" sanitary pipe runs north-south on Grant Avenue approximately 400 ' north of Puget Drive and 2 additional 8" pipes are located in the northeasterly portion of the powerline easement. Z. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #155 operates along S . Puget Drive adjacent to the subject site . 4 . Schools : The subject site is within one mile of the Tiffany Park Elementary School and within 1 /4 mile of Nelson Junior High School and within 2 miles of Lindbergh Senior High School . 5 . Recreation : The Nelson Junior High School site provides some open space and recreation areas . The site is also within one mile of Tiffany Park , Talbot Hill Park and Philip Arnold Park . Liberty Park is approximately 12 miles northeast of the subject site . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 40709B , R-4, Residence Multiple Family . 2 . Section 4-729 , "G" , General Classification District. 3. Section 4-722 (B ) , Special Permits . 4. Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading Ordinance , C I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 15 , 1979 APPLICANT : TRINITY FUND FILE NUMBER: SP-333-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a Special Permit to construct R-4 parking in a GS-1 zone and to combine the density of adjoining R-4 and GS-1 properties for future multiple family and single family residences . Although this provision does not specifically exist within the ordinance , the Special Permit (4-722 ) allows the Hearing Examiner limited power . to grant permits such as this based upon the facts and merits of each case . (Site development map attached ) . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1. Owner of Record : JAMES M . MANLEY 2 . Applicant: TRINITY FUND 3. Location : NW corner of Grant Avenue South (Vicinity map attached) and Puget, Drive South 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : ±5 acres 6. Access : Via Grant Avenue South and Puget Drive South �, , 7 . Existing Zoning : GS-1 , General Classification District ; minimum lot, size of 35 ,000 square feet; R-4, Residence Multiple Family , minimum lot size of 5 ,000 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R-4 , GS-1 , B-1 , Business Use . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : High, Density Multiple Family 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writ- ing of ,the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on May 4 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on May 3 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by ordinance #1871 dated March 8, 1'961 . The westerly portion of the property ' (the R-4 section ) was rezoned to R-4 from GS-1 by Ordinance 2059 dated October 21 , 1963 . The GS- 1 zoning of the powerline are proposed for use as parking and open space areas for this development has existed since annexation to provide generally for perpetual open space . . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING ; TRINITY FUND, File No SP-333-79 MAY 15 , 1979 PAGE FOUR 3. The proposed multi-family buildings are consistent with the lot coverage limits and setback requirements of the R-4 zone with the exception that parking is proposed to be handled within the adjoining GS-1 .zoned property below the power lines . 4 . Calculations submitted by the applicant indicate a site area of ±129 , 955 square feet in the GS-1 zone . Based upon this figure , the request is for 4 dwellings to be allowed for this portion , (based upon one home per 35 ,000 square feet) . Planning Department calculations show a site area of ±106 ,651 square feet based upon the submitted drawings and maximum number of 3 lots . If the applicant desires to have 4 units, a complete set of calculations should be required for verification . For the multiple family or R-4 zoned area , the applicant ' s figure and request for an additional unit are consistent with staff figures . 5 . Utilities are available to the subject site. However, the Utilities Engineering Division notes a special problem exists regarding adequate fire flow from the existing water main . 'Sewer and water plans will have to be submitted and approved and standard hook-up fees for both will apply. 6 . The Fire Department advises that the proposed multiple family structures are too large to meet fire flow requirements of the Uniform Fire Code . After further discussion with department officials , it was recommended by Fire that an alternative construction material or installation of sprinklers in individual units be considered in order to meet the UFC requirements . Concern was also expressed about the absence of any indicated emergency access , particularly regarding the northwest portion of the site . Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of that portion of the special permit to combine density of 101 dwelling units of the GS-1 zoned area and the R-.4 areas and recommend approval of the use of GS- 1 zoned area for parking and open space . 1. Provision of a revised site development plan providing a more balanced location of parking ,to the building location . 2. Provision of usable open space areas in both the R-4 and GS-1 zoned areas such as between parking bays , and along the perimeter of the buildings to consist of lawn areas or perimeter landscaped play courts. 3 . Applicant shall provide verifying calculations for lot area of the GS-1 zoned portion of the site to substantiate the proposed 4 unit density of this area . 4. Final Public Works Department approval of sewer and water plans per City ordinance requirements . 5 . Final Fire Department approval of access and fire flows to the proposed structure . 6. Provision of street improvements in the vicinity of the Puget Drive access, drive such as , but not necessarily limited to turning lanes , acceleration/deacceleration provisions , and traffic islands . 7 . Final Public Works Department approval of plans for off-site improve ments per L-10 and in accordance with ordinance provisions . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : TRINITY FUND , File No SP-333,79 MAY 15 , 1979 PAGE THREE • H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , pages 17 and 18 . 2 . Policy Statement , Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan ; Section #4B (Density Plan ) . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will disturb the soils , remove the vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and increase traffic and noise levels in the area . However, through proper development controls and procedures , many of these • impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment: The proposed 101 unit project will increase the area population by approximately 250 persons (2 , 5 persons/unit times 101 units ) . Regarding public services the Fire Department indicates that the proposed structure is too large to meet fire flow requirements . 3. Schools : This proposal will increase the school population by approximately 25 pupils ( . 25 students/unit times 101 units ) . These students will be scattered throughout the grade levels and should not significantly affect the existing facilities . 4. Social : Construction of the proposed units will increase the area population and thereby provide additional opportunities for social interaction among the area residents . 5. Traffic : The proposed development will increase traffic in the vicinity by approximately 620' trips •per day (6 . 1 trips/unit times 101 units ) . Current traffic on Puget Drive will be increased by 62% above the current 9300 trips per day . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended RCW-43-,21C , a declaration of environmental non-significance has been prepared subject to provision by the developer of appropriate access , suitable screening , and necessary recreational open space . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. 6 . City of Renton Parks Department . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The dwelling uses planned by the applicant are generally consistent with those permitted in the respective zones and provided for by the Comprehensive Plan . The proposed special permit approval is consistent with the approval of the Thunder Hill Apartments to the north which provided for recreational /open space uses and limited parking under the power lines . The special permit approval is consistent with approval of density mixes on the east side of Grant between Puget and S . 18th . 2 . The proposed uses are compatible with the existing uses in the immediate area and vicinity apartments and condominiums . Single family dwellings to the east are currently buffered by approved developments east of Grant Avenue South , � y � � � 1 ` , ' t9�1 /��01 i..- 44- .l. .i. y Lai J LJv,'•t-M--_I'1\ i r 1 , /� _�4�P • .y ` ;ter E r. .. . 'i. a •I ��.. _ • I yq I t• • 1 • 1 1 'lf , .' /�/: ` ' 1(--------) itr 41.Olk:. 1: A i 11 i 4 i id :-,,,:., .. Ititi I titillki 5-1, R irl, • 111-- • \- .... 1, (0!. .. It• . .. •'•I• L ae1 1 �; `:• \ f1.ro lJ�i• .Iw•I 1 ' .- '''S: .55 .46- ; °=--'t7v' . ��'1 j ..,,'...,,-;--A 41 +� ,o- .,I''\ r. R— iiii,04 '' 9 ,'• ---1,. ' 2101111111:Fr i'.,. . i • ' f ? ' ,.441 : !��OQ , I —I-. -.,t 41.WIDTIN, is ' . i . ' ',.. ---: ..- ,_____-_--r., -- .,..s..,.s,ill -1- It.' P \s \ ' ; 1 1-11—1 el .41•• /0 1$0 .0 an ■ I , i: \\ : . 4.4 , ♦ 14 • 1 ..,. .. f} _t j ' rib , NIP gt,t 1 liti , . 0 •1' g• ilfil .. 16... i \ l . , ... , tt . i • *• 2 _' { � on :_ . :. .. .._ . ; .,1 • , , , iirsv . ,i 1 .. 10 • ..,te is.9 oar_ 11 Spt1C1oiI1O1o .w T /\ '' ;i11 iI .''i; .\ • 1..4424,..-:,t:5fiF1iccItnii iI i mrlsa4 V "s M, ' S 0 J > -;. 1-4 _ \ '• - :-... 3 ' Pillmir :.\•• - ,-----A,----,-1 „ - .-- • — r-ri ittliltill's __•_. - • TRINITY FUND (Abitare Apartments ) 1 SP-333-79 APPLICANT TRINITY FUND TOTAL AREA +5 arse PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Grant Avenue South and Puget Drive South EXISTING ZONING GS-1 ; R-4 `s ISite presently undeveloped EXISTING USE FUTURE MULTIPLE FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES i PROPOSED USE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN_ High Density Multiple Family COMMENTS 1 • s ' ,Nei; . ;, h1.4- .ivam /O \\ ® I, ck ',rice - 220 otrffluM• ave o Q o P�7t 1-1 ,.. I 206 se tti e g wa o 98402 - 4 ... . ' �/N 797 _ ABITARE APARTMENTS ' APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT ' To Whom it May Concern:. • .- . The Trinity Fund is, with the accompanying application and develop- , ment plans, applying for a special permit as required based on the following circumstances : 1. The proposed parking on a S-1 Zone (leased from B,,P.A. ) and 2. -The proposed increase in lot density from the maximum of 96 to 102 units. First, regarding the parking situation. Development of the B.P.A. • ' landtwith berms and generous landscaped areas along with our com- mitment, to maintenance will be an improvement to what is ,presently • an unnaturally- graded and barren site. Regarding the density. While the proposed density is six units above the allocable under present zoning, the proposal is ' not , detrimental in terms of the open space, does not increase the environmen"tal' impadt •and we trust does not conflict with the goals set by the' planning department . We can see no significant benefit ' in deleting the six units. Admittedly our strongest motive for the application is purely out of hardship since the property was bought and the plans prepared under assurancps made by the previous owners that the proposal was legal and in compliance with city ordinances and codes. The Trinity Fund •has made a heavy investment of their time and in the expense of the Architects and Consultants and at this point the feasibility of. this project without these exceptions being approved is doubtful. We ,hope that without specific objection from the community ,the proposal 1.can be approved without unnecessary' delays: • r . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department ® ' once Department 0 Public Works Department O B u7lding Div . 0. Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) t 4,0 g etrii06 DATE : 1,/9"4,1/41 PLEASE REVIEEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : rhOr A /9 LOCATION : Ao 7 34 Amfa oeog APPLICATION(S) : de64115 A9/ el,-.79 rq 6. } ,e 01-7 , . r ,,,f4 6 eh/ ,f eyy , _ . IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING X RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (Si-7t-4f .-�Q o:-z.c..-�--ti CM Approved LNot Approved Comments or conditions : --/ /) O yz 5 s' , 7 i ' --j--- ,_/:,-_:. 4.4,1 41:(----. ..--a-e---=-0 7-2A2.3 i-t-,-----e-ak er„._ P /,‘„, e,-L-: , 2 ws a.-// S7 S gnatu a of Director r A t rized Representative) Date ty 94 6 .. r unit9- ioz • oom Jett - ,, .1' 4tVt1 1. '� � 'L'9 ea�+� 1^ '1444 - z -,; . ; 10\ ' 7:411L 4 ,,, s . . • . . . . . ,. . . ......., •.,,, : ;:, , . .# • ; . .. . _ „ , . .— . . ...., .• . ! •,.. . \.... „, .....,.......,......,..?..s..,.____ . . ; . . .. .,,. ..,,.... . ,. ._... .....,..f0:11.,...,... _ .1.7... ..,..„...,,,:;,_,,.....::,, _ .,. .. _ __ , .. • .. . , ,_ ,.. • . ,.„_ ,... .....41.,--"• •'.. .v '''-..:, , -. Z. - •") . . - , fit . . . _ .,. ..< , ,....• .... , . ...., . . __ „. :..... , „... , . • . - . ..,,, .,, . ; ....„ .„ ... . ._ ..,.. , _ . , ..,.: • ....,.o.,......,, .,.„.._.., _ —..14• ''.,' 11,1 .\,1 sl •• ?Too-aLr ?" , r , . Imo' ' ' ^i \i • r _ ` f 4 . . __ ..,..... . . ' Op .. _ . ii\,..\ ., • ! ' Zi-, .."•.-, - 'I...,t-.'r ii' - . , a.. -- - b - 7 -_1__ - 4ir.,,.4.oi., lPV k. fi I. . . . . le..$0i 1 • •. -:.-.0. ' .z..,ie-. , —-. - --.I, ......--''.."4..i" .. .,--;,.".I., iik 1 rooiar.o7.4,,t..-.:.:4"..b'e . .-- . . . •. . . , . .,..,, . ... ,. . .: .A',...,-- - -111k:_'• .- - -.. , . . ., ,..„,,,....;..- ,... ., .7--1.' --'''''' ' ------....„._ '''1_ ,i .-..v,:' ,.. r! 1 4 � y ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . ,,,► Engineering Div . O Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) / / . 4r SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 40 //? • Application No . :'___Zegnlil_ Action Name : V / I 6w# 4 d. Plea se review the attache . Review requested by (date) : 5 4g 47/ Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : -- lf,2- SIGNIFICANT )olloN SIGNIFICANT Comments : eif...-7�cl�. -"%t------" 2 Signature of Di ector or Authorized Representative ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : e artment : _ -TT l Zr (: 1.< <; 11�,)t L 1<.:. i ;\l G IGNIFICANT I INON SIGNIFICANT CoCo ments : tom. %, , , //(:/ 1� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date i �x �,y �q1&t�''k REVIEW BY OTHER CITY O ' `- RTMENTS Department : ✓�l_ _�� Approved E I Not Approved Comments or conditions : /!;/-7.„ /Thrte% Signatur�f Director or Authofi edRepresentative REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : I n A- rl c. '� F.l I N t F Approved E7 Not Approved - Comments or. conditions : r OW77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : � /�/�1C�� j`�-7' Q Approved of Approved Comments or conditions : z--ram= �— 2/ / 47 Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentative ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : U,{T►ury apr © Approved (jNot Approved Comments or conditions : C56G w-4B0 µ'its' ,APP'OUEO LAarait- pc44.1 2EQ402e0 — SPEuoc. ►Rc�c� s — 0468r geocracfc Putt �Coc�s .01/ SQ Fr SYs??,-- CtIrnz war�z r S� c APPo.ans 0 Sty Q( r ✓Ic-�u acr , �-, lC l 4/z3/7q Signature o'f' Director or Authorized Representative ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : � i�/I I ! SIGNIFICANT I I NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : C i Signature of Director or Authori ed Representative ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : f ' SIGNIFICANT ' i NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ' SIGNIFICANT 'D LNON SIGNIFICANT Comments : / /// t Signare of Director or Authorized Representative Date PROPOSED/FINAL __CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-: , )N-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-333-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-454-79 Cj FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks approval of a Special Permit to construct R-4 parking in a GS- 1 zone and to combine the density of adjoining R1.4 and GS- 1 properties for future multiple family and single family residen --- — - .. c e s . Proponent TRINITY FUND Location of Proposal NW corner of Grant Avenue So and Puget Drive So. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPT. This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is ® is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : A declaration of non_signficance has been prepared subject to provision by the developer of appropriate access, suitable screening, and necessary recreational open space. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non- significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Ti tl e PLANNIN �IREC��`R , y ' Date MAY 10, 1979 /M / Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 !r + \N L ave• ---- -Ifiv: -.,\,;\ ,,,..s, ,,,,. ...,,$1., . '74;c---- c . - . (4,: egVL '4' o 'Qo 0 1.i1919 . I— e ttrle 9 wa o 98102 01" doh o ° 797 . `9ti�lNc ��,. ABITARE APARTMENTS , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT . 0 . To Whom it May Concern:, - - • The Trinity Fund is, with the accompanying application and develop- , ment plans, applying for a special permit as required based on the following circumstances : . 1. The proposed parking on a S-1 Zone (leased from Bi,P.A. ) and 2. --The proposed increase in lot density from the maximum of 96 to 102 units. First, regarding the parking situation. Development of the B.P.A. • ' land with berms and generous landscaped areas along with our com- mitment, to maintenance will be an improvement to what isApresently • an unnaturally graded and barren site. , Regarding the density. While the proposed density is six units , . above the allowable under present zoning, the proposal is ' not - , detrimental. in terms of the open space, does not increase the environmental' impact end we trust does not conflict with the goals set by the planning department. We can see no significant benefit - in deleting the six units. • Admittedly our strongest motive for the .application is purely out of hardship since the property was bought and the plans prepared • under assurances made by the previous owners that the proposal was legal and in compliance with city ordinances and codes. The Trinity Fund •has made a heavy investment of their time and in the expense of the Architects and Consultants and at this point the feasibility of this project without these exceptions being approved is doubtful. We ' ' hope that without specific objection from the- community ,the proposal . ,can be approved without unnecessary' delays: • . ti ' I / , . • - " J OF R�� w, Co 1 "' :.., 0 THE CITY OF RENTON- ob :420 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. BENTON.WASH.98055 z KA '`° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT °9 • A m• 235- 2550 O4.qT ) SEF,1 May 3 , 1979 Trinity Fund 2033 Sixth Avenue Suite 111 Seattle , Washington 98101 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT R-4 PARKING IN A GS- 1 ZONE AND COMBINE DENSITY OF ADJOINING R-4 AND GS- 1 PROPERTIES (ABITARE APARTMENTS ) File No : SP-333-79 ; property located on Puget Drive and Grant Ave . So . approx . 300 feet west of the Bonneville Power Adm. transmission lines right-of-way . Dear Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on April 11 , 1979 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for May 15 , 1979. at 9 : 00 am . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning/Director ) /- ,: ()fled 7 A)/Wey,6‘,1 David R. Clemens , Associate Planner cc : Robert Kovalenko Architects , 235 Summit Ave . E . Seattle , Washington 98102 James M. Manley , 2033-6th Avenue , Suite 111 , Seattle , Washington 98101 e , N • . . . , . . 0 aveo MAY ila9 . . • seat* 9 wao 98402 ( 206 0 07797 • „,c. Eyeer.:,,,2 . . • . . • • April 26, 1979. , . - • , . . . , ABITARE APARTMENTS ' . . RE: Amendment to. Speciar Permit 333-79 fdr Abitare Apartments , • I . ,To Whom it May Concern: • . • After filing our original application on April 11, 1979 it was . .brought to our attention that , our request in regards to 'a proposed lot • density of 102 units cannot be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner and would require a Variance Application to the Board of Adjustment. light of this we are revising our request hoping to simplify matters for all involved. We are now simply proposing to mix the density of the R4 zone with the 'density of the Si zone hopefully allowing a total . density of 101 upits. This figure is based on a total of 97 units • allowed for the property owned by the Trinity Fund zoned R4, combined with four units allowed for the property' leased, from the Bonneville Power Administration zoned Si. (See calculations attached) . ,We appreciate the cooperation that we have received from the City • staff on this matter. . T • Thank you, . ' ' • ' . , • . , .ROBERT KOVALENKO, ARCHITECTS ' . ' . , . . . • ' , . . . , . . . ' • - . . Robert Hale • - • . , • . . ' . . . . . . - . . . • • tli dls , • .attachment 0 . • . , . , . . . - . . , . - , • . • . . , .... • . . • . • _ . , . . . .• • I r S .. * t r . - . . I . . . , • • . • , #, . r . . % . . . • . . 411 . , CALCULATIONS . Trinity Fund parcel R4 zone (89,328 s. f. ) O 39 1 bedroom .units x 800 s. f. = 31,200's. f. 58 • 2 bedrooir units x 1000 s. f; = 58,000 s. f. _ 97 units total 89, 200 s. f. required Leased Parcels (BPA) . S1 zone (129,955 s. f. ) . • ' @ 35,000 " s. f•. per unit = 3.713 units (4) total units = 101 • • • • • • ♦ Y - • • • • • • • • OF Rg� THE CITY OF RENTON o C.) ®B : - Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 z oe1 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT mo ' 235- 2550 OgrEO SEP1��O April 19 , 1979 MEMORANDUM TO : Dan Kellogg , Assistant City Attorney FROM: Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director By : David R. Clemens , Associate Planner RE : ABITARE APARTMENTS ; PUGET & GRANT We have received a 3 phased special permit application for the above project which we had previously discussed with you . As you may recall , the project involves an area zoned R-4 and a second area below the powerline right-of-way zoned GS-1 . The three parts of the request are : A. Allow multiple family parking in a GS-1 single family zone ; B . Allow a combination of the density of the two differently zoned areas ; C . Allow an increase in total density beyond the combined density of the two zoned areas ; Request A and B appear to be properly within the scope of a special permit and are consistent with previous actions of a similar nature . We are somewhat concerned about request C , and whether it may not properly be that of a special permit . Special permits are designated to consider "uses" (4-722B ) . But, is density considered "use" ? Density is obviously " use" in the sense of R-1 , R-2 , R-3 , R-4 etc . zoning classifications . It could also be considered a " development standard" similar to a setback , lot coverage or height. In the case of this development , the proposed density increase is minor (3 units out of 102 total ) and the combined density of the R-4 and GS- 1 zoned areas at 25 units/acre is essentially that of R-3 (30 units per acre maximum) . Therefore , is it not reasonable to consider a residential density under the provisions of the special permit? Thank you for your consideration . If you should have any further questions , please contact this department. DRC : sh EN CITY OF RENTON ®0 O� APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT U FOR ,OFFICE USE ONLY •��'.•• Qj File, No . SP- . 3.3g -7g Date Rec' d, c ` 3 �e O 7( Application Fee $ �� Receipt No . p Environmental Review Fee $ 0,760 APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name Trinity Fund Phone (206) 623-9600 Address 2033 Sixth Avenue, Suite 111, Seattle, Washington 98121 2. Property location 10500 Puget Drive 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) See attached 4 . Number of acres or square feet *see below Present Zoning R-4 (S-1 ) 5 . What do you propose to develop on this' property? Apartments *89, 328 s. f. Trinity Fund/129 ,955.5 s. f. leased from B..P.A. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : Ai. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307.5 in addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: - Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. 1-77 • • AFFIDAVIT • • I, Id_ • A& I e , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the pro erty invo ved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers erein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this c3rcl day of afa , 1-9 9- • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at 29,41t1Z (Name of otary Public) ignature of Owner LrLIJf. //. 9'o1 (Address) �o7�i Lam. ��Eti (Address) , 42.166_ (City) State) 6a3 96o6 y;,', (Telephone) • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION • This is to certify that the foregoing application has .4,"-nr •ected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in e , ri - - --r and to • ; conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton - De a -,ment governing the filing of such application . • 1 ti 1�1a Z. Date Received , 19 By: C. :A • ZANNING Renton Panning Dept . 2-73 • .', N. • ,Ill' • �r . • J `\��\\\1111 1 3 1111/J1 .Z,' 'p•••'' as ree.•. -• Y _ j eau •�ND(\ J-/0o ._ " C.) c�,s�c—a 1 kJ o '.1G`01\ U 1' "w 6f ` -, .. ,,, 0 L1 (,`_a'av /` Gv 1 .� t o - f -2- • 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as -the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 10500 Puget Drive, Renton , Washington. Sthe site is situated • on a gental , westerly slope. Extensive grading and recontouring of the land surface has occurred in the recent past (entire area of site) only minor additional grading is anticipated. 8. Estimated date for completion of the. proposal : November 1979. 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : Building Permit. Use permit for parking on S-1 Zone. Use Permit for increased density (99 units to 102) . 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No. • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Application for Special Permit attached. Future Building Permit application. II . ENVIRON'MENTAL IMPACTS' (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? x YES MAYBE ff (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? x YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x ITT— MAYBE W — (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? x YES MAYBE (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,, either on or off the site? x YES RATE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which • may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x Yam- MAYBE Explanation: Topography will be recontoured to restore past grading to a more natural condition. Z7Z 4 CITY OF RENTON,, WASHINGTON' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM N Tp 11 w FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PQZk •` A.'� Application No. ®333154 -7� Environmental Checklist No. Ci ' 9 —757 41M4NG 9�' PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971; Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires • all state and_: local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where • you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though' completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. ' BACKGROUND 1,. Name of Proponent The Trinity Fund 2. Address and' phone number of Proponent: 2033 Sixth Avenue, Suite 111 Seattle, Washington 98121 (206) 623-9600 • 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Abitare Apartment Complex 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : A three story 102 unit wood frame apartment (V 1 hour) with a flat roof and stucco exterior. Total building area = 103,206 s. f. • -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, . insects or microfauna)? X Yes MITE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES, MAYBE NO (c) lntroducti'on of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES RATAT NO Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YES MAYBE In-- Explanation: (8) - Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES TAYBT NU— Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MMAYBBE N Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YET MMAYBE ff Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Y.�,� WET Explanation: The proposal will help satisfy a demand for increased housing. -3- (2) Air. ' 'Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YEB' KM' NO- (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YT MAYBE Ri- k) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any, change in climate, either locally or regionally? • ' X . YES - AYN-BE NW Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X, YES MA B NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X ` TES- MAYBE NT- (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NU- (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Yam- MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NT- (f) Alteration of the direction or rate, of flow of ground waters? x V! MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through, interception of an aquifer- by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE ND (i ). Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies'? X YES MAYBE Nth" Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X Yt MAYBE NY (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,, rare or endangered species of flora? X YEB' MAYBE N-0-- (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X YES- MAYBE A- (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? - X YET' MAYBE'. 0 Explanation: A landscape plan will be submitted providing for all new flora (mostly indigenous) where none presnetiv exists. -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES . MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? x YES WATTE (f) Solid waste and disposal? x YES MAYBE N0 Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? x VTV MAYBE NT Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x MAYBE Nir— Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YE.- MAYBE N Explanation: Tenants' use of existing community recreation facilities may impact their capacity. (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? x yl:s MAYBE WU— Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon his checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful 1 of ull sclosure on my part. Proponent: sig ed120 1- }/ IF Itk ue (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 4 -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,, or create a demand for additional housing? X Yam- MBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/'Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? x YES WEE' NO (b) .Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE WO— (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? x YET- MAYBE gr (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x YES FrATir WO-- (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X Y MAYBE WO--- (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? YET- MAYBE ff Explanation: Increase vehicular movement on and off site onto Puget Drive. (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? � YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? X YET- MAYBE NB (c) Schools? YES MAYBE IB (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? x YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Tenants ' use of existing community recreation facilities may impact their capacity. (15) E'nergy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x YES MAYBE W— (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require • the development of new sources of energy? x YEB- MAYBE WO-- , Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? YEr- MAYBE WU- (b) Communications systems? x YES MATTE WO-7- (c) Water? x YES MAYBE NO �RENTO CITY OF RENTON ': APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT PQ� � 4,1 FOR 'OFFICE USE ONLY File No . SP- Date Rec' d. gNNING � Application Fee $ Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name Trinity Fund Phone (206) 623-9600 Address 2033 Sixth Avenue, Suite 111, Seattle, Washington 98121 2. Property location 10500 Puget Drive 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) See attached 4. Number of acres or square feet *see below Present Zoning R-4 (S-1) 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Apartments *89, 328 s. f. Trinity Fund/129, 955. 5 s. f. leased fromB.P.A. 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B . Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . . . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) ' E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and . Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307. 5 in addition to the above. 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. 1-77 / I . . �- 9l G.;,qi ,oN .6s; 's0.9� �., re rt\� L.9 C • ', k r a► �r '01. o •% .N / A I 01 • t by . . . n.,,•-'e .L • J . ,s s k / 114 , X • ;Tri Yi i 1.- . .9 x on �, r\ r/ �' • .�• 1.i .... . ,.. 1 . ,./,, .---, \ .• ; • ,.:;!. r . • • A. , , .. ..., .....• . . • • „,...„. „." • . , • , . 80 x ', • ,,\ /., , ', . . . Apr .. . ! - . • • o, gti .Pj� Q • •••.�t� My W 141 ' AI. A/2 \ % % 1 • .1%% I/ . • c'•. f /.. / 1 frir, . ift., "a . ' p.-.4 • 1 %0 .1 • . 1... . i14, A.•:.‘, . . -i. 0,. „ ..D. t I Q• r •�'/ " \e - - - .I • ` w `� • �‘‘ I?t,li� .tip itV\ / . A. ' p.)% `p I 1 , / I • . AA • ..;./ ,ts. Q- J tip`,. 6 • hat •• • A •' /�ypy I)' �h / �; /�° ' / // •/ s`�$ / i• c1 . • I • t 0 // /4% \*. / 10 - . W ,‘ Cr ti 1 N Y1 111 \ .;.. i• f. n\ . U 0 n1' '• IS ,Q, ' .........." • 1 I,,‘\ ._.. 7. 7 • • .�. t Y 'a'.r 19 p v1 —r , '• rr' 1 : °eV pi • J r ,i ' .• - . • • :•-,..:A. , ••-'•---,..... -4,,,,..1,.-:.',';•.•:'....,..: -, •,•, ..•'" , ,',',;,'..:,... '.- ',,'''.4--.'-1,,, .,-,'•-•44.,,•,.: - C'., ft....-.4 1. i. --,•:. 4 „:. ', f'2 't:-..f, „1„;,,,i,4,,,,,,I.;;,,,..5t..i.,,:;•,:.'!,.li...::'k_1?-1=-,:',„•st,:i‘z•-•Tr:":„7.,•!,:1,. , "Mk n :.,-; • :: ' ' 'l '. • • : . ' :',i' ' " .1,,,' • -n^:)•,,, 1 1;/,5r.1.;i,•••81 1 r h'. .‘.''.-•', ''' !- • - • . . • , , .....' t . ''.• . '::. •'''l'',.. ' • .!'1`,.•••.,: r .: ..-,•••• ......,e,,f-,,.. . , ‘r,,,:',),I....:_ • ,e, ..,..• :,.',:.;:•'-,;',1.. •••4•••?fl'It, -'1'.%t.':1‘.''•7. -',i);#, ..-7,t, if,....4,44,•.,..0.,• 4.-„. :•••• ,ci' ciii,,, t,,,......,., 14!•-•-•,-,-, . 4;•.•, .. • ,,°;',../!'-•r1;t1.4.': • , • .•,.. . . • , . • '.,''ilri,.' , •:41,1,. :•' . ' • , ..•••..., • , . , ., : . 1..::. .•,. • :=1:.C,';'•-•;-;.: : :. ,';',.• - .4; ..'ef',,',..t:1'..;',, :se.- „J.:A.2i,, • . ii, •• ,-; •,?-,•,:',-,,./• , V 1-9?. ; •,.!: e .. "-••• •'.'',...:`,''.,'.1' „;lii-",,,,H.,2 . - ,,,:,,,,,,r....9,1 ,.; (;. , .•?,,.f..te .1... ' '1:';....14'.51,VI' •ix‘ ti'',.- 14,4,...'ANI • . • ;-.••;:',...,.-?si.„ — .,..„.t,44,„:-•,, ,,,I:lop::- •‘44.X0•4•Al'-r,'. ..4(.4,•,.44ki;•-•,..a t '-:!-':. ••-..s.-Vi,,•41„, ,......„ •:',,;-..;•-••-‘1,!-.v..-il..--• ''P• _ .. • . ' ,. (.. , ,•,-,- -.;,.?„--;, •,:,..-.....',-,1-,..-,:,: -: ., .V.:'4,,..;!',Ii•-•;.'7;;',`:1;*:,.,;.•-11.,,,'`'•,e',-;;;- 'f,...` " '• . '',..et,.;•,:.-,1„,:,-.,i;i.;:,.:•,,.:,r•F':•:, ;: ? • — .,,'. •' . ' ... • "••• •-..,.1-e.'i-i.o.....,,,,., 1:•••,:,-!,,-,-,7-. f viueL LIU . 4LDb/ / • EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION: • • That portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 20 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.N.', also being a portion of Parcel No. 30 as described in instruments recorded under Auditor 's File Nos. 5959604 and 6150334 described as follows; Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Southwest' 1/4'; thence North 89° 10 ' 20" East along the North line thereof, a distance of 344 . 88 feet to a point on the Northeasterly margin of Benson Road; thence South 16° 16 ' 56" East along the Northeasterly margin of said road a distance of 1357 . 98 ft to an angle point; thence South 21°20 ' 40" East along said margin of Benson Road a distance of. 346 . 25 feet to the margin of the intersection of Benson Road and Puget- Drive South; thence South 57° 25 ' 58" East along said margin a distance of 138 . 39 feet to the Northerly margin .of Puget Drive South; thence South- 88 °50 ' 40" East along said margin a distance of 335 . 00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; • thence North 21°50 ' 14' West a distance of ,458 . 25 feet to the Southerly boundary of .Parcel No. 40 as described in instruments recorded under Auditor ' s File Nos . 6517071 and 6517072; thence South 89°16 ' 56" East along said boundary a distance of 97 . 21 feet to a point on the Southwest( right-of-way line of B. P .A. (Covington-Seattle) Transmission Line Easemer thence South 42°35 ' 54 " East along said right-of-way line to a point of . intersection with a non-tangent curve , having a radius of 683 . 23 feet; ' being the North right-of-way line of. Puget Drive South; thence Westerly along said curve to the left, a distance of 49 . 6 feet more of less to a point tangent, thence North 88°50 ' 40 " West along the North right-of-way line of Puget Drive South a 'distance of 275 feet more or less to the True Point of Beginning. - _ ' Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. • `/,r • • • ,, 4, 0.,, • .'r• i ' • , • �' 1. ,. Ai r 1`f . ' . . L_(-•• a Dat ; • .6 • . ' - „ . . , *. ;• .A:.... •!--•f--- • 1.▪ ;••••▪•:v,I .? .i' • LIMITED USE PERMIT No. 5 • • • ' • • n il•f ••; j:. l' THIS LIMITED USE PERMIT made this 17.',• < day of , l'x.f- _,-�:96$ ;;:" •• i•• ,. •y .• I/ •.' 41 • by and between PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation ("Puget" I:/a .as • 4:' herein) and TRANSAMERICA•TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, as Trunteee':_ • " ;•i=' ("Transamerica" herein). • . :,-' .# • • • ;• - In consideration of th• e covenants and conditions herein contained and in '.4! full full compliance with paragraph 6 of that certain Earnest Money Agreement dated October •,. • t. • ' - =.r' : 29, 1965, between Puget Western, Inc. and Transamerica Development Company, Puget hereby :f:;' grants permission to. Transamerica to use that real. property (the "Property" herein) nit .c -!4 .,- uated in Renton, King County, Washington, as described_ in Exhibit •"ATM attached beret*:;;':• T:f ta• and by this reference ade a part hereof. a.��. i • 1. ' Term. The term of this Permit in ninety-nine (99) years from the • :. .,t 3 i• date hereof. • • • ▪ 1�i Lt 4. 2. Use of Property. The occupation and use of the Property by Trans- • ,. aaerica shall be•limited to access, uncovered automobile parking and recreational purl i.P: r .•1.�r• ::i. • poses, provided that such use and occupation shall not be exercised in a manner that-:4 ;: :f'i: a ' would interfere with, impede or be detrimental in any way to the unrestricted prim ; -.::. D: ; use• of the Property by Puget for electrical utility right-of-way purposes or in any •c' y•• - - • a- i i.__• way create risks or hazards to persons or property in light of such primary use,. and =', provided further that Transamericate a shall at all times be expressly subject to 't '; -.`▪ _ construct, operate, " • •; Puget's right to/relocate, maintain or repair existing or future e,,A- --lng transmission ; or distribution lines on the Property without any cost •to Puget arising from any din- . �: -•. • turbance to improvements made by Transamerica::-.- t •• • 'i:`' 3. Structures. No building shall be erected or permitted upon the Prop-• • '':=• erty at any time and no other structures shall be erected except those normallyincident :11- to uncovered parking and/or recreational purposes and in no event shall any such improve•- 'meat be permitted'which would in any way create a risk or hazard with relation to the. . primary electric utility use to which the Property is devoted. In the construction of •;': `' any permitted improvements, Transamerica shall comply with all applicable safety and '`''•' building codes and regulations. • • . - 4.. Taxes. Transamerica shall a responsible for. the full amount of real':. • property taxes assessed on the Property and any inprovaaents Dads thereon by Transaaerici • • • • • . I•• • .: •. ••,, •;{, \• •.f - .` •••• �'.,�., • • • ,- I , • • ' • •J.' • '• •. 1 -▪ �••• .1 • - • . ••• ; -�� .. • . ;• .''.• .•?... . •.I`l♦ • i 'fran's::merica shall, on an -'�ual 'basis, reimburse Puget f.--- the full amount of any such ; . taxes paid by Puget following the. notification by Puget' as to the amount thereof, but ! _ ' not upon any improvements made thereon by Puget.. .0:4,-:-. 5. Insurance. Transamerica shall buy and maintain in full force and effect throughout the. term hereof public liability insurance in the policy amounts of $1,000,000/$3,000,000 and .property damage insurance in the policy amount of $50,000. .• ' `,..•'. / . Such policy or policies shall expressly name Puget as an additional insured and�shall'. -.- . i . be non-cancellable without prior written notice first having been delivered to Puget. , • 6. Assignment. Transamerica, or its successor, may at any time assign or transfer all of' its rights hereunder, provided that no partial assignment or transfer•.• . . j. _ shall be permitted without the prior written approval of Puget, which approval Puget :: ;;f , ti covenants it shall not withhold unreasonably, taking into consideration the needs of ' :; '. 4 . Transamerica, or its successor, in connection with. an orderly development and sale of ;` .:% • the property. Upon any such assignment or transfer, Transamerica, or. its successor, r- ' as the case may be, shall be relieved of its unaccrued obligations hereunder with respect to the property so assigned or transferred. - • - . • 7. Termination for Default. If Transamerica or any of its assignees or successors shall-default in the performance of any covenants or agreements or conditions •• herein with respect to any portion of the Property, and -if such default shall continue ' fora period of thirty (30) days after receipt'by Transamerica or its then successor or . • assignee with respect to the Property so involved of written notice from Puget of .said - .. default,. Puget may, at the end of said period, declare this permit. forfeited and said _ term.ended with respect to the portion of said Property involved, by giving Transamerica or its said successors or assignee then holding Transamerica's interest with respect to.: ': such portion of the Property involved, written notice of forfeiture: - •;:' �. , r . EXECUTED as .of the day and year first-•above written.. ' - - . TRANS CA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TRUSTEE PUGET SOUND POWER 6 LIG T COMPANY • '_ : C— �., �____— By,` -21'. 1 �,,4I,Y74---. -r.- Its f.L * �.---c , 6 - Its • �3ANAGER - REAL ESTATE DIVISION ,....„ . .. . ...... . . . • .• • . . ..• • By 21;;; 01 •By .�% • ,:ecratur . I u - its L�%��l , Its .. . .. . •• • . ` :IQ'4C - . . • • • • • •.... ••ric1:: .,1. . ;f' - • ; . • 1/lx�'47INr1 .'Yt • . Er7!F : ;-D;•r F,.,.. - • :x . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • . ' . • ) .as. . • : COUNTY OF KING. ) • = . 1 ... On this j7Xs- day of �i¢r-,1 , , before me, the under— '•_ signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, L•• • personally appeared / r'S!1F A Phi/J/, and (7 21 S[igc tec. ._ • ; . to me known to be the A2T9GER - REAL ESTATE DIV anIdO�f Secretary • of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing Limited Use - Permit, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporatitin, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated :-::: • that they were authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is .-. - . the corporate seal of said corporation. - - • - • • • • • WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first • above written. - _ - .• . - ; • • * - V - • _ NOTARY PUBLIC in. and for the State of • . . Washington, residing at .4...,—t�-f:= - STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . - . - . - •• - • - • • ) ss. •. COUNTY OF KING ) •• ' 1969, - On this 28th day of - 'April . SR., before me, the under- - signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, . - personally appeared . Benj . C. McDonald and - Vein L. Arnold - to me known to be the Asst. Vice President and Asst. Secretary TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TRUSTEE, the corporation that executed the fore- - going Limited Use Permit, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and volun- t - ' tary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that.they were authorized to execute the said instrument'and that the seal • -affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. • • • .. • ••WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first • - •. M above written. % • ::',--,,. ..,....,) r Notary Public in and for the State of Washingto residing. at S.,eattle, . . - = 5 1 , • - • • ASSIGNMENT OF PERMIT RIGHTS (P.S.P. &L. CO. No. 20-23-05-0513) By agreement made this IPA day of 4pR11 1979, GLOBE DEVELOPMENT CO. , a Washington Limited Partnership, ("Assignor" herein) , hereby assigns to JAMES M. MANLEY, an unmarried man, all of Assignor's rights and interests applicable to that certain real property ("Property" herein) , described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and by this reference made a part hereof. Assignee hereby accepts this Assignment, and as a condi- tion thereof, hereby covenants and agrees to comply with all terms, conditions and obligations applicable to "Transamerica" as set forth in that certain Limited Use Permit involving the Property made on the 17th day of April, 1969, between Trans- america Title Insurance Company, a California corporation, as Trustee, and Puget Sound Power & Light Company, Washington cor- poration, and recorded under -Auditor's File No. 6514859 , records of King County, Washington. The parties hereto agree that the effective date of this "Assignment of Permit Rights" is March 1 , 1979. GLOBE DEVELOPMENT CO. , (a Washing- ton Limitee artnership) i` a�i By Title 1 ":Ines M. Nanl' • PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY hereby consents to and approves of the foregoing "Assignment of Permit Rights. " PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ,ice 'IF anage Real Estate Division STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) • On- this 06, day of ,p/t , 1979 , before me, the undersigned, personally, appeared LESLIE A. DONNER, to me known to be the Manager-Real Estate Division of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the r'--2) ses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he as authorized to execute the said instrument. c—/- GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of • Washington, residing at67-,,,,Fcc STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) On this �--t-j day of Qp,j 1979,. before me, the undersigned, personally appeared -€7". C 7' CS-,c-,, ,t_ and` _ , to me known to be the General Partner and , respectively, of GLOBE DEVELOP- MENT CO. , a Limited Partnership, that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Limited Partnership, for the uses 'and purposes "therein mentioned, and on oath stated that &e__ authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day . . and year first above written. !,--:4 ) N tary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at - x1 ( ; STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) • On this day personally appeared before me JAMES M. MANLEY, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes •therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this . (5'�` 0 day of 7-�,' J,Li f , 1979. /--- C <?1 , /A6) ,‘77 /Zi'd t-V , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at i ,v- e'-& -b - . ASSIGNMENT OF PERMIT R. TS • • P.S.P. &L. CO. No. 20-23-05-0513 • • . "EXHIBIT A" . • • PARCELXII - .. - That po.tion of the SW 1/4 of Section •20, To::nship 23N, Range S k'.::. dose=;bed as follows; . . -. •- w ' . Co oncing at the W 1/4 cornor of said section; thenco U o9°10'20"3 - . along the cast--rest centerl th ' 'e a distanco of 3 .88 feat to a poir.t . on the'northeasterly.Harbin of Ronson Road; thence S l6°16'Sbaz along -northeasterly marg{n-of said road a dictanco of 489.37 foot to z point on the south*.:e•sterly margin of onnev lle Porter Administration's right- o_-may as recorded vndor )udi;,or's i o No. 3292927 and No. 3241106; . . . - thence S 42°35'54 E along-said xa g1n a distance of 1503.492 feot to - the true point of bogir rting; thcncs N 47°24'0521 S a distance of 93.20 feet; thence S 80°35'544 S a di.s anco of 115 feet; thence S 88°3S154 .3' - . a distance of 109.40 feet; thence R 66°50'31° E a distance of 47.22 - feet; thence S 83°09'3222 E a d anco i -oft 44.2 feet to a point on the • - north reeterly r:argi.n of Grant Lvo. South; thenco S1°50'2821 W a1o.-n Laid•rargin a distance of 265.87 feet to a point on the northeasterly r.3rgin of Pugot Dive;. thenco N 70°53'47 It a distance of 90.93 feet • - - • to a point of cuvc.turo; thence `long a curve to the left having a - •~ ' radius of 683.23 feet, an arc distance of 164.42 feet, to a point on . the soun::esterly margin of Benncv flo Po:.•ar:14atnistration's ri-- _ ht_of - 1•ay as rocordrd under Auditor's-File lio. 3292927 and No.. 3241106; - . thence fl 42035154 W along said. -argin a distance of 189 foot to tho ' . true pointbeginning? • - - • • .. s . • • • • 'Corinth Co. - • _ D .: 20, 1968 . • • . • • - • _ . • - 6. • • ASSIGNMENT OF NON-EXCLUSIVE PERMIT RIGHTS (P. S.P. &L. CO. No. 20-23-05-0413) By agreement made this 614 day of Xriv.t , 19 79, GLOBE DEVELOPMENT CO. , a Washington Limited Partnership, ("Assignor" herein) , hereby assigns to JAMES M. MANLEY, an unmarried man, all of Assignor's rights and interests applicable to that certain real property ("Property" herein) described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Assignee hereby accepts this Assignment, and as a con- dition thereof hereby covenants and agrees to comply with all terms, conditions and obligations applicable to "Transamerica" as set forth in that certain Limited Use Permit involving the Property made on the 17th day of April, 1969, between TRANS- AMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, as Trustee, and PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation, and recorded under Auditor' s File No. '6514858, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT: Assignee 's obligation to reimburse Puget Sound Power & Light Company for real property taxes as provided for in paragraph 4 of said Limited Use Permit, shall be limited to one-half of the. full amount of real property taxes assessed against the Property and improvements thereon. The parties hereto agree that the effective date of the "Assignment of Non-exclusive Permit Rights" is March 1, 1979. GLOBE DEVELOPMENT CO. , (a Wash- ington Lime Partnership) By 7 Ti le c Ja es M. Manley PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY hereby consents to and approves of the foregoing "Assignment of Non-Exclusive Permit Rights" . PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY nag r-Real Estate Division 7 a • • ' 7 • STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) • On this I4 day of ,4PR,L , 1979 , before me, the undersigned, personally, appeared LESLIE A. DONER, to me known to be the Manager-Real Estate Division of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the us sand purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he authorized to execute the said instrument. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in an for the State of Washington, residing at,aT,yz-« • STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) On this ��- day of C , 1979,. before me, the undersigned, personally appeared - �,e__cr and•- , to me'-mown to be the General Partner and , respectively, of GLOBE DEVELOP- MENT CO. , a Limited Partnership, that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Limited Partnership, for the uses -and purposes therein mentioned, and on oith stated that authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day . and year, first above written. _ • >Z2!--t--7-63/ ( . . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing • STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me JAMES M. MANLEY, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and_ deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this . ram'' day of (2,c, i , 1979. / otary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at h-�_ 7J _ • • • - 2 - . ASSI,n4AENT OF NON-EXCLUSIVE PERMIT RIGHTS (P.S.P. &L. CO. No. 20-23-05-0413) ..X:x11..1.15.13: A-- • • PAR: a. X A • That- portion of. the 5,4 1/4 of Section 20, To:mship 2311, Ranzo 5 E, W.M.• d�3c-Oe3 as follows: •• • C =encing at the .N 1/4 corner of said section; thence N 89°10'20n E along the. east_west centerline a distance of 523.33 feet to the - " - - northeasterly �zrgin of Eorirze?i ..]_e Poier AM-iinintration's right-of-vay as recorded under Auditor's Files No. 3292927 and No. 3241106; thence - S 42°33'54" E along said northeasterly- margin a distance of 1352.82 feet to the northwesterly rargii: of Eonnevi21e .Poor Administration's right' - of-way as recorded under Auditor's File No: 5178076; thence N 22°42'56 ' E ' • _- along said northwesterly- margin a distance of 296.08 'feat to'the south- --• , uest_rly margin of Prosper L hier ?.goad; thence S 57°03126a •E along said - -- aoTathweaterly margin a distance of 285.35 feet; 'thence S 26°09'18'1 W a - distance of 365.51 feet; thence S 42°33154„ E a distance of •302.00‘feat - - to the true point of. beginning; thence continuing S 42°35'540 E a . • distance of 69.95 • �. i ' wester] - feet, to a point t on e Y rargin of Grant • Ave. South; thence S 1°50'28* N along said northwesterly r-argin a' . " - distance of 37.50 neat; thence '.,- 88°09'32s W a distance of 44.20 feat; ;hence ;i 3 °06'�:�3 n SDI a distance of 66.50 feet; thence N 47°24'06 n E a - - . di3t.aaco of 48.00 feet to-the true point of beginning.ng. . . . - _ - • • - " - • _ j , • • • . - • . - : . • -• ' • Corinth Co..- • - Dec.23, 1968 • t..s --- . . - - - - - - - —--• -- - -- -- • • P, • • • . - •- .• - - • 0 1 - . • • • • • ASSI ENT OF NON-EXCLUSIVE PE. T RIGHTS (P.S.P. &L. CO. No. 20-23-05-0413) EXHIBIT "A" • • PARCEL XI A That portion of the. Southwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , described as follows: Commencing at the west quarter corner of said section; thence N 89°10' 20" E along the east-west centerline a distance of 344. 88 feet to a point on the northeasterly margin of Benson Road; thence S 16°16' 56" E along the northeasterly margin of said road a distance of 489. 37 feet to a point on the south- westerly margin of Bonneville Power Administration' s right of way as recorded under Auditor' s File No. 3292927 and No. 3241106; thence S 42°35 '54" E along said margin a distance of 1150. 79 feet to the true point of beginning; thence S 60°50' 54" E a distance of. 94. 00 feet; thence S 45°05' 54" E a distance of 79. 00 feet; thence S 64°05'54" E a distance of 69.40 feet; thence S 80°35'54" E a distance of 231. 00 feet; thence S 88° 35 '54" E a distance of 90. 00 feet; thence N 27°04 '26" E a distance of 23.20 feet; thence N 47°24 ' 06" E a distance of 14.99 feet; thence S 34°06 '48." E a distance of 66.50 feet; thence S 66°50 ' 31" W a distance of 47.22 feet; thence N 88° 35'54" W a distance of 109 .40 feet; thence N 80°35' 54" W a distance of 115.00 feet; thence S 47°24 ' 06" W a distance of 98. 20 feet- to a. point on the southwesterly margin of Bonne- ville Power Administration's right of way as recorded under Auditor' s File No. 3292927 and No. 3241106; thence N 42°35'54" W along said southwesterly margin a distance of 352. 70 feet to the true point of beginning. • • • • • 10 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MAY 15 , 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. ARTHUR D. GUSTAFSON, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM GS-1 TO SR-1, File R-292-79; property located on west side of Union Ave. N.E. , approximately 200 feet south of N.E. 10th St. 2. ARTHUR D. GUSTAFSON, APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 17-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION (GUSTAFSON ADDITION) , File PP-334-79; property located on west side of Union Ave. N.E. , approximately 200 feet south of N.E. 10th St. 3. TRINITY FUND, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT R-4 PARKING IN A GS-1 ZONE AND COMBINE DENSITY OF ADJOINING R-4 AND GS-1 PROPERTIES (ABITARE APARTMENTS) , File SP-333-79; property located on Puget Drive and Grant Ave. So. approximately 300 feet west of the Bonneville Power Adminis- tration transmission lines right-of-way. 4. MICHAEL N. READ, APPLICATION TO DEVELOP SELF-SERVICE STORAGE AS A COMBINED USE WITH AN OFFICE/RETAIL BUSINESS PARK (RENTON BUSINESS PARK) IN B-1 ZONE, File SP-338-79; property located at 3812 N.E. 4th St. 5. GENE 0. FARRELL, APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH, File E-343-79, (WEATHERED WOOD NO. 2) ; property located at N.E. 23rd St. and Edmonds Ave. N.E. Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 15, 1979 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED May 4, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , DAVID R. CLEMENS , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BYLAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn / to before me, a Notary Public , on the 2nd day of May 19 79 SIGNED ' 9 i , ' Syr l, ix • i i GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON PUGET DRIVE- AND GRANT AVE. SO. APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET. WEST OF THE BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION TRANSMISSION LINES RIGHT-OF-WAY • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON' PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A. : •gin' }^ ,t^? A . , ii4 PU ' 0' Li . . , . , ., . • TO BE HELD . IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ' ON MAY 15, 1979 • BEGINNING AT - 9: 00 AM- q;M. 1 CONCERNING ITEM EJ . . .. : REZONE . . , . . . '' ~ TOCONSTRUCTR-4 PARKING INAGS-1ZONEPECIPE ' MIT & COMBINE DENSITY OF ADJOINING R-4 AND GS-1 PROPERTIES (ABITARE APARTMENTS) J SFILE No: SP-3�3- 9 ATE �PPR®� L - WAIVER , . . , . . , . SHORELINE - MANAGEMENT PE 'IIT ' , ,I 1 . . . . , , , . , . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 • THIS ' NOTICE NOT TO E REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION