Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA79-402
12_ . VADS BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE Sp� G1AL P��r11T 5P- �oa- �q TO FILL GRADE VICINITY or LAKE WA. BLVD . S. E. ZLo TN STKEET SEa — BELIE PROPCI�TIES APPEAL FILED 3/2y/80 of - RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 7, 1980 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; EARL CLYMER, ROBERT HUGHES, COUNCIL RANDALL ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, AND JOHN W. REED. Charles F. Shane arrived at 8:04 p.m. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, .Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; HUGH DARBY, Police Chief; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks Dept. ; TED BENNETT, Finance Dept. ; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF MARCH 24, 1980 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published and mailed according to law, Mayor Shinpoch opened Final Assess- the public hearing to consider the final assessment roll in ment Roll the amount of $492,768.87 for construction and installation LID 307 of certain street improvements, including curbs, gutters, asphalt paving, all underground utilities, together with water, storm, sanitary sewers, power,telephone, street illumination, and all necessary appurtenances thereto in the area of Raymond Ave. SW running in a southerly direction from SW 16th Street, southerly an approximate distance of 1200 feet. Letter was read from Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director, stating there were no protests filed against LID 307 final assessment roll . Mr. Gonnason added there are only four property owners involved. As there were no comments from the public it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, APPROVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR LID 307 AND REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Financing - MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO ALLOW MR. KENNEDY TO SPEAK LID 302 RE LID 302 FINANCING, CARRIED. Mr. Dick Kennedy, of Seattle NW Bonds Securities, submitted offer to purchase LID 302 bonds. Noting letter of credit for Glacier Park representing 18% of their interest, which represents 58% of the entire amount of the LID. Bonds are a mix of term and serial bonds with fixed maturities. City Clerk read offer as submitted for $4,550,000, or such lesser prinicipal amount of legally issued bonds to be dated May 1 , 1980, to pay $100 for each $100 par value of bonds plus (Final accrued interest to the date of delivery to them. Letter was Assessment read from Gwen Marshall , Finance Director, recommending concurrence Roll - in the request of Seattle Northwest Securities, to purchase LID $6,058,822.92) 302 bonds. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE REPORT RECOMMENDING CONCURRENCE IN THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT'S RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE OFFER FROM SEATTLE NORTHWEST SECURITIES AND ASSOCIATES APPROVING PURCHASE OF BONDS. REFER TO WAYS AND MEAN'S FOR ORDINANCE: CARRIED. AUDIENCE Nancy Barry, President Renton Chapter of NOW, 6189 So. 124th, COMMENT requested item re travel to non-ERA ratified state be heard. Request for MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, REMOVE ITEM FROM CONSENT Travel to AGENDA RE REQUEST BY POLICE DEPT. TO TRAVEL IN NON-ERA STATE Non-ERA Ratified AND ACCEPT SCHOLARSHIP. CARRIED. Ms. Barry inquired if food and State lodging were being supplied, If the class will be held else where at a later date, if class is available to women officers and If the department will have adequate coverage in his absence. Mayor Shinpoch noted travel to non-ERA ratified states has been denied For conventions and conferences . Renton City Council 4/7/80 Page 2 Audience Comment - Continued Police Mhyor Shinpoch added class is' only offered at Northwestern Travel , University in Illinois and that both •male'And female officers . ' were; a l Lowed;.to attend. Police Chief Darby noted food and lodging were included with scholarship and only expense to the city would be for travel and continued wages and benefits,. ;Chief Darby added that the benefits far out way the inconvenience of being temporarily without the officer. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, TO GRANT TRAVEL FOR POLICE OFFICER TO TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION SCHOOL IN EVANSTON, ILLINOIS• AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE'PRESENT POLICY OF BANNING TRAVEL TO NON-ERA RATIFIED STATES. CARRIED. Sea-Belle Bill Snell , Attorney, .1530 Bank of California Center, 900 Fourth Special Permit Ave. , Seattle, representing ,Sea-Belle Properties requested item SP-402-70 and. re appeal of Special Permit be presented. MOVED BY CLYMER, Appeal SECOND STREDICKE, ADVANCE 'ITEM UNDER CORRESPONDENCE RE SPECIAL PERMIT AND APPEAL. CARRIED. Land Use Hearing Examiner, Fred Kaufman, decision of 3/10/80 recommended approval with conditions of Special Permit for fill and grade' of' property located Lk. Washington: Blvd': and SE 76th St. Appeal was filed by William Snell on behalf of Sea-Belle Properties. Planning and Development Committee report was read recommending council modify the decision of the Examiner to delete .Condition No. 5 and the reference to installation of trees in condition No. 7.,thereof because the Examiner was in error as a matter of fact in citing that the proposed landscape plantings would be incorporated into the ultimate landscaping plans for the site and affirm the decision of the Examiner as modified. Mr. Snell requested council also consider modifying requirement of off-site improvements for drainage. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, TO CONCUR IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT - AFFIRM THE EXAMINER'S DECISION AS SO MODIFIED;. •CARRIED. Request for As requested by the Mayor,, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES TO READ Hook-Up to LETTER SUBMITTED BY MR. 6, MRS. HENRY A. MILLS AT THIS TIME. City Sewer CARRIED. Letter was read requesting hook-up to the city's System. - sewer system• due to a health problem. Upon inquiry Mr. Mills, 10200 - 138th Ave. SE,' noted city line is located across the Henry A. Mills street and past attempts to annex have failed due to lack of signatures. Letter from Seattle-King County Health Dept. was read noting inspection of the Mill 's septic tank system with back-up and overflowing through top of theetank, adding repair of the septic system would not be practical and encouraged hook-up to a sewer system. Moved by Stredicke, Second Hughes, to refer matter to the Utilities Committee. SUBSTITUTE MOTION. BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, REFER MATTER .TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REPORT TO COUNCIL. ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: TRIMM, CLYMER, ROCKHILL, SHANE; 3-NO: HUGHES, STREDICKE, REED. MOTION CARRIED: . CONSENT AGENDA' The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: Request for Planning Director requested authorization .to attend American Travel Planning Association National Conference, April 12-16, 1980 to be held in San Francisco, CA, requesting advance travel . Council approve. Request for Police Chief Darby,-requested authorization for trio ioff i:cers.:;to attend Travel Pacific Northwest Vice :Conference to be held• at Vancouver, •B.C. April 1.8, 1980, and request for advance travel funds. Council Approve. Request for. Land Use Hearing Examiner, Fred Kaufman, -requested authorization Travel to attend American _Planning Associati:ori:.National Conference, April 12-16, 1980 to be held- in San Fran.c:i.s:co, CA•, requesting advance travel . Council ;approve.- ;•s:._"- . ,. • • • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • State of Washington) ) County of King ) - • Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the loth day of Marrh , 1080 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. . • -1� Subscribed and sworn this \ - day of V'scc_h 19 %0 . • • \sw)4' \ry\ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton • Application, Petition or Case: Sea-Belle Properties; SP-4.02-79 (The m.i.na teb contain a tat b,t o l5 the paittiea 04 necond) For . Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # 7a/ AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING : : -as = SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of Atril 7, 1980 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. SP-402-79; Sea-Belle Consent Properties Special Permit for Fill and Public Hearing Correspondence X (rad ; Appeal of Examiner's Decision Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner's Report, 3-10-80 Other B. Letter of Appeal, Received 3-24-80 C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Concurrence Finance Dept. Yes No. N/AX in Examiner's decision to approve with Other Clearance conditions. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The Examiner's Report regarding the subject special permit application was published on March 10, 1980, and granted approval with conditions to the request. On March 24, 1980, within the established appeal period, an appeal was accepted by the City Clerk. The Examiner's Report and the appeal letter are attached for review by the Planning and Development Committee prior to placement of the matter on the City Council agenda of (pril 7, 1980. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 2 of the Examiner' s Report. 1 SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. \'c _ s'==•! ,,:."Wh;-_',7•= vim•.,;:•; • 43.21C.032 Title 43'RCW: State Government Executive ' ,,, ,:%),,1,,,,:,it ems: T ,'•W._4 across Hood'Canal'and Puget Sound and upon the Kitsap and Olym- people and cities with a population of more than thirt — `44!-, f ,. is peninsulas.The de artment_of trans rtation is directed to proceed " ",< : p r p P9 seven thousand people, such conditions or denials made , �.:..:•, with such actions in an environmentally responsible manner that would % "'" inset'the substantive objecti5es of the state environmental policy act more than one year from September 21, 1977 shall also ,-:,..'1;, r; _;,•. :a ':., End the shorelines management act,and shall consult with the depart- be based upon policies developed by the appropriate lo- t k `,'P "ment of ecologyin theplanning process.The exemptions from the state T' '"` p � cal governmental authority and incorporated into resolu- ;.��, ., , environmental policy act and the shorelines management act contained • tions, regulations, ordinances, plans,' or codes. In the r ,,r' _` ; e in RCW 43.21C.032 and'•90.58:030 are intended to approve and ratify ' 'r:i the timely actions of the department of transportation taken and to be case of counties with a population of less than seventy ,, ',,,,`'' s taken to restore interim transportation services without procedural de- . thousand,people and•cities with a population of less than t ;t; s ,,,.i-•„ ;, v ' lays." [1979 1st ex.s. c 84 § 1.] The reference to "this act" refers to thirty—seven thousand people, such conditions or denials ' ' 1: ;'_r this section,the amendment to RCW 90.58.030 by 1979 1st ex. .c 84, made more •than three years from September 21, 1977 ��''"r` -` and to new sections RCW 43.21C.032 and 90.58.145. rsi`:`r:,a','.t 'shall also be based upon policies developed by the ap- '. ti;; propriate local governmental authority, arid incorporated ` 4, :'-,,,;',':`..2,_: 43.21C.035 Certain irrigation projects decisions ex- into resolutions, regulations, ordinances, plans, or codes: ' .:< empt from RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc). Decisions pertaining - Provided, further, That, except for permits and variances r to applications forappropriation of cubic feet of ' `"k{e ppfifty issued pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW, when such a ,,,,;?:,;,;,,,;: 1 water per second or less for irrigation projects promul-P J P governmental action, not requiring a legislative decision, .' )}:> :r'- : ` < private firm, private corporation or ''' "" gated by any person, P .,,,,.;is conditioned�,or denied by a nonelected official of a lo- ;<�<:���,;_ ;,.;� • private association without resort to subsidy by either cal governmental agency, the decision shall be appeal- A, -...t, 1 state or federalgovernmentpursuant to RCW 90.03.250 :',„, ':_;,-`:,; • able to the legislative authority of the acting local ;,,;:r:,:*- '; ' through 90.03.340, as now or hereafter amended, to be governmental agency in accordance with procedures es- µ ;,:n,,, .,: used for agricultural irrigation shall not be subject to the tablished for such appeals by the legislative authority of 1y',;?';''. -;,'.:.;. requirements_ of RCW 43.21 C.030 2 c), as now or �` ' , q O( the acting local governmental agency. [1977 ex.s. c 278 �;;,�y{;; ,.•; hereafter amended: [1974- ex.s. a 150 § 1.] § 2; 1971 ex.s. c 109 § 6.] :•."i=i:.',``:4 43.21C.040 Examination of l laws, regulations, poli- • 43"21C.070 Establishment of classifications and cat- i. n..,'.fi, ,,4,:,, cies by state agencies and local authorities—Report of egories of building permits and acts of governmental s44.? ',';; " deficiencies and corrective measures. All branches of agenciesconcerningfamily .-- ''' residences Exemption :;���;r.� ,.•,,, ;ti government of this state, including state agencies, mu- from'"detailed statement" requirement. The department ' w' ' }r,'„';;1..' nicipal andpublic corporations, and counties shall re- '. p p of ecology shall, within forty—five days from July 1 :<:r : .�''''. view their present statutory authority, administrative 1973, after notice and hearing, promulgate rules and ;':''a^','-+7,;--' regulations, and current policies and procedures for the regulations pursuant to chapter 34.04 RCW to establish �#,4r-,;_'<,": ;, of determiningwhether there are anydeficien-. .V,•- '"'.- purpose classifications and categories of building permits and, ;<,.,tti c,.,. cies or inconsistencies therein which prohibit full com- acts of governmental agencies concerning an individual ' ;4, ,11,,;:`,- pliance with the purposes andprovisions of this chapter `,,'''"`'•' p p P single family residence, which classification,and.category• '' t•���.�.� ;•_.';• and shall propose to the governor not later than Januaryexempt ``. `-'r.''_ _ n statement" k„ shall be from the detailed required , -°h r,.,,, -•` 1, 1972, such measures as may be necessary to bring by RCW 43.21C.030. Building permits and acts not So ;,•t,«<.-;_c;,:,:,..,. their authority and policies in conformity with the in- classified shall not be presumed to either require or not ; � ''4,.:�;, , tent, purposes,and procedures set forth in this chapter. require a "detailed statement". [1973 1st ex.s. c 179 § , ':':', ,., 1971 ex.s. c 109 § 4.] 1.] '" Effective dote-1973 1st ex.s.c 179: "This act is necessary for the •`E',"a '- 43.21C.050 Specific statutoryobligations not af- g immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, the .�' ,„ fected. Nothing in RCW 43.21 C.030 or 43.21 C.040 support of the state government and its existing public institutions and y yfa_ „ shall in any way affect the specific statutory obligations shall take effect on July 1, 1973: Provided, however, That prior k of anya env (1) to comply with criteria or standards of thereto, the department of ecology may take such actions, including . • ?#,,:;i:, ' g Y P Y the issuin of notices and the conduct of public hearing, as aie•neces-. "':!`,.. - environmental quality, (2) to coordinate or consult with , sary to insure the implementation of section 1 of this act." [1973 lst .;4• ,.'',,; any other public agency, or (3) to act, or refrain from ex.s.c 179 §4.] This applies to RCW 43.21C,070-43.2.1C.090. ,••!:, }.;,' ' acting contingent upon the recommendations or certifi- f,'''' cation of any other public agency. [1971 ex.s. c 109 § 5.] 43.21C.080 Notice of action by governmental „;j;,;>1;;;'r. agency How publicized—Form—Time limits- ,,`; ', 43.21C060 Chapter supplementary. The policies and tion for commencing challenge to action. (1) Notice of '' ±.,' ';;;:- goals set forth in this chapter are supplementary to those any action taken by a governmental agency may be ,''60-" :: Lr. ;:r ,r. publicized bythe actinggovernmental agency, the a li 'T•:"`'" set forth in existing authorizations of all branches of g y' PP ';''.;>'_ ,.`�. government of this state, including state agencies, mu- cant for, or the proponent of such action, in substantially M tasq nicipal and public corporations, and counties: Provided, the form as set forth in subsection (3) of this section and ;,;a;,,,' ,. however, That-any governmental action, not requiring a in the following manner: '' • ' publishing notice on the same dayof each '"'°z,=':,:." - legislative decision, may be conditioned or denied pursu- (a) By p g , .:,;, ant to this chapter only on the basis of specific adverse week for two consecutive weeks in a legal newspaper of y; ', NI ,,,..,;.,:.- -:„-3,, environmental impacts which-are_both identified in the general circulation in the area where the property which : y,;,,;,•' environmental documents prepared`ptirsuant to the is the subject of the action is located; i;;"';ti ' `, :. chapter and stated in writing by the responsible official (b) By filing notice of such action with the depart- X .,'. of the acting governmental agency. In the case of coun- ment of ecology at its main office in Olympia prior to :.,,yfia :"'t.?:,,' ties with a population of more than seventy thousand the date of the last newspaper publication; and f,, ,. ?`;<:;'', [Title 43 RCW(1979 Ed tr,;«::t„'z;s' Jr' OF R4, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U ,� ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 abel rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 990 �• CITY CLERK 0 9�TF0 SEP'rEM��P March 25, 1980 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTONN) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) DELORES A. MEADI, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly swornon oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 25th day of March, 1980, at the hour of 5:00 P.M. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King county, Washington, by first class mail , to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY JOEL HAGGARD AND WILLIAM SNELL ATTORNEYS FOR SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, Special Permit SP-402-79. nazzett„)/ Delores A. Mead, City y lerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 25th day of March, 1980. )-240L Notary Public i n and:fprI the r State of. Washington, residing; in' King County _ st OF R4, A •y o THE CITY OF RENTON � �� �` z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 n rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD �.9A �• CITY CLERK o9TED SEP1c40 March 24, 1980 APPEAL FILED BY JOEL HAGGARD & WILLIAM SNELL ATTORNEYS FOR SEA BELLE PROPERTIES RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner's Decision Dated March 10, 1980, Sea-Belle Properties, Special Permit, SP-402-79 To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk this date, along with the proper fee of $25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code as amended. The City -Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton City .Council at its regular meeting of April 7, 1980 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON 'a. 721,624e. Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st 1 ?r 01) OOP WAI 1g$® ,rizo RECEl'i ED ; 2 0t 011 3 4c, alto ogle c;', 4 5 BEFORE THE CITY OF RENTON CITY COUNCIL 6 Regarding Fill Permit Application ) File No. SP-402-79 7 by Sea Belle Properties NOTICE AND STATEMENT 8 ) OF APPEAL 9 Applicant asks the City Council to modify two 10 onerous, unreasonable burdens recommended by the Hearing 11 Examiner. The conditions are noted as Number 1 and 5 in the 12 Examiner' s decision (page 7, Examiner' s Report, dated 13 3/10/80) . 14 Background. 15 The applicant intends to fill and grade an approximately 16 3 acre site north of N.E. 44th Street along side the east 17 edge of Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. No development plans 18 have been proposed for the site. The site will appear 19 little different after the filling, primarily in it being 20 relatively flat and hydroseeded. Notwithstanding this, the 21 Examiner has required the applicant to plant a row of trees 22 on the north and east property lines of the site (See Condition 23, 5) . Applicant believes that trees for screening should not 24 25 be required until there is some development to screen. The City' s SEPA Responsible Official concurred in this. See 26 Exhibit A. 27 28 NOTICE AND STATEMENT OF APPEAL-1 • HAGGARD, TOUSLEY&BRAIN. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW 1530 BANK OF CALIFORNIA CENTER 900 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WA 98194 682-1008 001 , - 41011 The site lies near the end of a natural drainage 2 basin encompassing about 80 acres. Runoff from another 220 3 acres has been artificially directed onto the site at the 4 present time. The City' s Public Works Department is concerned 5 that filling of applicant' s site will reduce its capacity to 6 handle runoff from about 280-300 acres of developed land. 7 However, neither the Department, the Examiner, nor the City 8 required a property owner to the south of applicant' s site 9 to do anything about the drainage from the 220 acres which 10 artificially passes over that property and onto applicant' s 11 site. And in spite of future concerns, the entire 300 acres 12 is not fully developed. If and when development occurs, any 13 developer will be required by King County' s or Renton' s 14 drainage ordinance to retain runoff on the development so 15 that the rate of runoff is the same after development as 16 before. So even if we assume that everything is developed 17 tomorrow, the rate of runoff, natural from 80 acres and 18 artificial from 220 acres, onto applicant' s site will be no 19 greater than now. Consequently, applicant believes that it 20 is unreasonable for it to pay for and install off-site 21 drainage pipes not required to handle the runoff. Applicant 22 also believes it is unreasonable to require it to pay the 23 entire cost when the general public and subsequent developers 24 are the beneficiaries. 25 In short, the record indicates that the applicant 26 is being required to do two things that are unreasonable. 27 We ask the Council to resolve the matter equitably and 28 fairly. NOTICE AND STATEMENT OF APPEAL-2 41011 4101, 1 Landscaping. 2 The applicant does not disagree with the concept of 3 buffering the property with a row of trees. We just disagree 4 that it has to be done now. Fill activity will not essentially ; 5 change the overall site appearance. No structures, no signs, no 6 development -- nothing will be constructed. Why then should 7 trees be planted to hide nothing? 8 The Examiner seems to suggest by Finding 10 that the 9 trees are necessary to mitigate habitat loss. The City has 10 already determined that what little habitat loss will occur is 11 not significant since a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) was 12 issued for the fill permit. The DNS states that no measures for 13 loss of habitat should be required until the time of development. 14 With regard to the issue of timing, the DNS is in accord with the 15 applicant' s request that planting .not be required until development ' 16 occurs. 17 The Examiner, who is not making a legislative decision, 18 has exceeded his authority under RCW 43 . 21C. 060, which requires 19 that any conditions be based on specific adverse environmental 20 impacts identified in the environmental documents. The problem 21 of habitat loss is identified in the environmental documents, but 22 the same documents declare that no mitigation is required until 23 the time of development. By requiring the planting of trees now 24 the Examiner is going beyond the impact problem identified in • 25 the DNS and exceeding his authority under RCW 43. 21C. 060 . 26 . 27 28 NOTICE AND STATEMENT OF APPEAL -3 41011 410 1 But the point is not whether a row of trees 2 should be planted, but when. The Examiner has made a 3 substantial error in fact and law by requiring the planting 4 now. We ask that Condition 5 be rewritten to read: 5 "A landscape plan providing the planting of at 6 least a row of trees along the north and east property lines, such trees at the time of planting to be no less than four feet in height, should be 7 approved by the Planning Department prior to any 8 development of structures on the site. " 9 Drainage Condition. 10 The basic problem is that this applicant is being 11 asked to pay for and put in drainage pipes off-site to 12 handle drainage that should not be on its site to begin 13 with, when the present situation does not require the 14 improvement and when other developers and the general public 15 are the almost total beneficiaries. The record is clear on the facts. The drainage 16 17 from about 220 acres to the south and east of the site has 18 been artificially directed onto applicant' s property. Even 19 with the filling of the site, Mr. Robert Bennett, design 20 engineer, explained that in his opinion there is no particular 21 on-site problems with drainage utilizing existing pipes. 22 Mr. Bennett gave his professional opinion that "there will 23 be no problem with the design of the fill as proposed with 24 storm water passing through the existing 24-inch pipe. " 25 Public Works did not offer any testimony contrary to these 26 conclusions. 27 ///// 28 NOTICE AND STATEMENT OF APPEAL-4 NEED COPIES TO: 4IV SENT Y CITY ATTORNEY''S.',dFFICE .� RECORD CHRONICLE (PRESS) MAYOR'S OFFICE `' / CITY COUNCIL ,/D FINANCE DEPARTMENT HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,!r `' PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR /! PARK DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT mow, J//s / ifs \ /&//z4e. ' ,/ 69/S �C/i�JI�J/sa /l� i�7f�'SiZL � ..s 0 1 The record reveals that the dispute is really over 2 the assumptions made in concluding whether the off-site 3 drainage improvements are required now. Mr. Bennett' s 4 conclusion was based on no further development of the 5 southerly 220 acres or so and compliance with the King 6 County or Renton drainage ordinances if and when development 7 is proposed. City Staff concluded the opposite on the 8 assumption that since this site is the focal point for storm 9 water runoff, offsite modifications are necessary to prevent 10 impact to the area. The essential difference is that the 11 City Staff wants our client to pay for off-site improvements 12 now because they might be needed in the future, if and when 13 development occurs. The City Staff ventured an opinion that 14 without off-site improvements, the existing 24-inch discharge 15 line would have to be larger. This is clear error since the 16 record is clear that the 24-inch line is adequate to handle 17 the runoff associated with a fully developed upstream 18 drainage basin of 80 acres. And it is the 80 acre basin 19 that is the natural flow to our site. 20 The condition requiring applicant to pay for 21 improvements off-site, not required by the proposed fill, 22 and for the benefit of other properties not in applicant' s 23 natural basin, is unnecessarily burdensome. As such, the 24 condition is an abuse of discretion and invalid. We have 25 had cases in Washington where conditions have been objected 26 to by a party and the municipality has been sustained. In 27 Gerla v. Tacoma, 12 Wash. App. 883 (1975) , a condition that 28 NOTICE AND STATEMENT OF APPEAL-5 • • I. 110 1 certain property be dedicated for public use was sustained, 2 in part because the Court concluded that dedication for 3 streets is reasonable and no testimony showed that losing 4 the area would affect the proposed gas station operation. 5 Unlike that situation, we have here a condition requiring 6 the applicant to spend about $10, 000 to $15, 000 to benefit 7 other parties and to correct an illegal diversion by others. 8 The condition also assumes that prospective development in 9 the 220 acre basin would not be in compliance with applicable 10 drainage codes. Being unnecessary, the requirement to put 11 in off-site drainage improvements is an unnecessary burden, 12 unreasonable and thus void. We ask that the City Council 13 resolve this so as to preclude the need for further proceedings. 14 The Examiner has made a substantial error in fact 15 and law by requiring the off-site improvements. We specifically 16 request that Condition 1 be modified to read: 17 "Approval of the Public Works Department of the surface water retention/detention system, which 18 system is not required to include any off-site improvements. " 19 DATED THIS ) day of March, 1980 20 21 Respectfully submitted, 22 HAGGARD, TOUSLEY & B TN 23 ,' 24 Joel Haggard William Snell 25 cc: Sea Belle Properties 26 Mr. Paul Butrim 27 28 NOTICE AND STATEMENT OF APPEAL-6 AMMah ) PROPOSED/FINAWIRLARATION OF SIGNIFICAN T-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-402-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-494-79 ` 4 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks a special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 22 , 500 cubic yards. Proponent SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES North side of N. E . 44th along east edge of Location of Proposal Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : Reduction of drainage area by construction of two alternative culverts. The drainage area reduces from approximately 300 acres to approximately 80 acres. Environmental enhancement measures to be required at the time of development to mitigate loss of wildlife habitat . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plannirig D . ector Date February 20 , 1980 S i g n a t u r e,-f- ! p City of Renton !! Planning Department 5-76 . . , . , ,-•. ',:z,-,..,-,ii.,., • ',I. .",-.,.':....,:•.,:;::::,,.:,:i-:-,-.; ,'-'2,:•-.,:,*,,-',4:,':,-,..„:-,. ',.:,-..';:''.,,?;-:,.'„,----,'„,..i',.. '--",:.:-.'.„,•-:,,-','."..,,.'..,-.• - ,;-. ,. ..,,%',,,,,...'.v:'''...`,,,:,`:•.4,,,,-1..q-,',:' ,:.', ?;:i',..1,,.v .,, _..7.2, _,q .: ':',.' '. -, ''..'.''.',',..'''.','..f"...'f4'....T'-",::: •-?. :-...,-,::::.".:,',.;:.;;C:1''f{::_1.;' ,.ill. .,:'.'.: .,.': %:',... ::•,„.'''c, ,,V:3:-..:::::::'-,.',:,,!:';'' :' ' ' - -. ' •.'. r•.,.-:,,, %„".,.:,. .,.', ,:;:2`,-,f.,. ' •' ' '' . .' • ' : '' '-.IS' • . , ., i. , . . -.. ' . . • ' , . . .. .. . ' . . . . . , . , . 1 , •• , • • 1 . . • . ' . . . .. . , „. . , . , ,. . . . . . . • 1 . .. . ! . . . ,. .. . . . . , . 1 . . • , „......". . ' „ , :, ,, • ' ' . ' • ,..,„.. >,,-, ,.• . . .. 1 . . . I . ., . . , CITY:- OF ..RENTON • • . , • FINANCE. DEPARTMENT . No. 12971 . I .. !• .. . . , ._ ... . • ' 3•—D--74-. RENTON, WASHINGTON 9 80 5 5 1.922E1::., , .., , • • , . , • RECEIVED OF . ‘4 ct9(Ica 'T6Qctet ,C).rct tr) . , . . . . ... . ..• . , . , . • ' appaat VD( 1 ci li plfPAriA.-raQa-gq-\\ . . . ' aoco -,:.---., • , . • •,, . i , .., ,,. .. . . . ,. . . , . . • , , ,. .• , . .. . •• , . ; • • . , .. . .. ,. . . - . ..,..,...,. . . , . . ,.... , ..,,, . .. . . . . • . , . , . • . , ,: - . ..... „ ... ... . „TOTAL os bo.'.. • .„. ,,. ;. , . . ...... . .. .. , . . .,.. . ,. . , ,.. ..,... , .. . . . .. ..,....,., .-,..,.,GWEN 'E''. , -MARS HAT.1, F NANCE DIRECTOR •:' -.- ,;',:.,,,,,ir , . . . .,.. BY• . , . _ , . ,. . . , . . , PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER . PUBLIC HEARING - FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 APPLICANT: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES FILE NUMBER: SP-402-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks Special Permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 22 ,500 cubic yards. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: G. HARLAN LEWIS 2. Applicant : SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES 3. Location : North side of NE 44th Street along (Vicinity map attached) east edge of Lake Washington Blvd. NE 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5. , Size of Property: ±3. 07 acres ' 6 . ; Access : Via Lake Washington Blvd. NE and NE 44th Street 7. ' Existing Zoning : B-1, Business Use 8. , Existing Zoning in the Area: B-1, G-9600, Residential Single Family; minimum lot size 9,600 square feet ; RM-1800, High Density Multiple Family (King County Zoning) . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on February 13 , _1980 , 1 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on February 7 , 1980. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The 'subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1823 dated April 21 , 1960. Tract #184 and the South 160' feet of Tract #185 was rezoned from G-9600 to B-1 by Ordinance #2487 of July 18 , 1969 and the remainder of Tract #185 was rezoned from G-9600 to B-1 by Ordinance #2592 of October 23, 1970. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography : The existing site slopes from east to west with a slight slope to the north. A 24" culvert drains under Lake Washington Blvd. and I-405 to Lake Washington . � I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, File No : SP-402.-79 FEBRUARY 26, 1980 PAGE TWO 2. Soils : Bellingham silt loam, less than 2% slopes (Bh) . Permeability is slow, runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight . This soil is used mostly for pasture and a few areas are used for row crops. Kitsap silt loam, 8-15% slopes (KpC) . Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is moderate to severe. This soil is used for timber and pasture. 3. Vegetation : Scrub grass is the dominant feature in tie west and central portions of the property with some medium height shrubs and blackberries near the easterly extreme. Scattered Douglas Fir and some deciduous species are also present . 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: A spring is located in the northeasterly portion of Tract #182 , located immediately to the east of the site, flows in a southwesterly direction across the site . 6. Land Use : The subject site is vacant . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area east of FAI-405 is primarily undeveloped with the existing uses composed principally of single family dwellings . Grading is presently underway on a site to the east for a multiple family project and the property adjacent to the south of NE 44th is being filled from a recent Special Permit . To the west of the freeway the land uses are a mixture of industrial, commercial and some multiple family uses. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer : A 12" water main extends along Lake Washington • Blvd. NE and 6" and 8" mains run east-west on NE 44th Street . A 12" sanitary sewer is located on NE 44th Street along the southerly border of the site. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #240 operates along Lake Washington Blvd. Northeast adjacent to the subject site . 4. Schools : Not Applicable . ' 5. Recreation : Not Applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1. Section 4-711 , B-1, Business Use . 2. Chapter 23, Mining, Excavation and Grading. H. APPLICABLE. SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Reports , 1965 , Objectives, pages 17-18. I , IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems : Filling of the site will disturb soil and vegetation, increase storm water runoff and increase traffic and noise levels in the area on a temporary basis. However, SP-402-79 Page Four State Department of Transportation, dated December 12, 1979 and January 7, 1980, regarding capability of the existing 24-inch line previously installed by the Department of Transportation to handle storm water drainage without incidence of flooding. The letters were entered into the record by the Examiner as Exhibit #8. Mr. Haggard also referenced Hearing Examiner File No. SP-321-79, Austin Company request for special permit for fill and grade, which pertains to property located south of the subject site, and for which no conditions were imposed to require installation of off-site drainage pipes. IIe felt that the applicant should not be treated differently from the developer of the property to the south, and according to the opinion of the Engineering Department staff, runoff in the area could be adequately handled by diverting water across property from the south onto the applicant's property via the existing 24-inch line. Mr. Haggard indicated that it would be unreasonable to require the applicant to install two off-site lines to benefit the entire public and basin area when the drainage is adequately handled without them. He agreed that a proportionate share of one percent could be imposed upon the applicant for the entire cost of installation of these off-site improvements to divert the unnaturally diverted flow from one site back into its normal basin, but he restated comments by Mr. Blaylock regarding the possibility that development of the 200 acre area to the south located in King County will not increase storm runoff because of the requirements of the drainage ordinance which require provision of on-site drainage facilities prior to development. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding King County requirements, Mr. Haggard advised that the City of Renton Drainage Ordinance incorporates by reference the King County ordinance except as specifically modified (Section 4-2915) . The Examiner asked Mr. Bray if drainage flow from the 200 acre area was modified by the Department of Transportation. Mr. Bray indicated that older maps reflect that at one time the water flow followed a different direction, but determination of the exact date of the diversion cannot be established. Mr. Haggard referenced Section L.1, second paragraph, of the Planning Department report which specifies actual modifications necessary to the drainage system, and he questioned the necessity of installation of pipe under the roadway since runoff can be adequately handled in a similar manner by open ditch, and runoff from other properties will be governed by the drainage ordinance of the City of Renton and King County. Mr. Haggard concluded his presentation by requesting modification of the recommendation to delete requirement for installation of two off-site drainage pipes which would benefit the entire basin area, and elimination or substantial reduction of the 25-foot landscape buffer, conditions which he felt are unnecessarily burdensome and unreasonably onerous. The Examiner requested further comments by the Planning Department staff. Mr. Blaylock advised that development of the King County property to the east zoned B-C would require water and sewer service which in turn would require annexation of the site into the city. He noted that the Comprehensive Plan does not guarantee that the current zoning on the site would be retained and would be automatically zoned "G" upon annexation. Therefore, future land use of the site is unknown and further supports the imposition of a landscaping condition to buffer the site from surrounding properties. In addition, Mr. Blaylock indicated that the application for special permit for fill activity generally requires the Examiner under Section 4-2304 to review and consider future activity on the site, and because no activity is proposed, landscaping is even more appropriate since the land will . remain vacant for an unknown period of time. He noted that the landscaping requirement is not premature, and the buffer can be coordinated into future proposals on the site. Mr. Blaylock disagreed that the site can be filled without providing modifications to the drainage system' since it is a focal point for storm water runoff, and the Engineering Department had indicated that certain modifications, including two off-site pipes, are necessary to prevent impact to the area. He stated that the proposal contained in File No. SP-321-79 is dissimilar to the subject request because the topography on the Austin Company site is higher. Mr. Bray indicated that Mr. Haggard was correct when stating that the City of Renton utilizes the King County ordinance for storm water detention; however, King County requires and enforces a requirement• that storm pipe be sized for the ultimate development, and in this particular case, the city is approving a permit which • King County would not allow. He restated that he disagrees that eventual problems will not occur with the existing system if built without certain diversion for storm water runoff. Mr. Haggard disagreed that a landscaping buffer should be required on the assumption that adjacent properties may eventually be annexed and utilized. for single family residential development. He entered a map of right-of-way location, dated June 4, 1963, which shows the subject property and its general vicinity, and stated that the property located to the south at that time consisted of a wetland area and the subject site did not. The map was entered into the record by the Examiner as Exhibit #9. Mr. Haggard indicated the applicant's willingness to pay his fair share of one percent if provision of off-site lines are determined necessary in the future, but objected to bearing costs for the benefit of the entire area. He advised that the Department of Transportation had previously determined the appropriateness of the size of the 24-inch pipe currently servicing the • ti r//2 SP-402-79 Page Three to a ditch system if grading occurs which may be more advantageous than burying the pipe in the freeway system, but the proposal has not been discussed with the Department of Transportation. - The Examiner requested testimony by a respresentative of the Engineering Department. Responding was: Bob Bray Engineering Department Mr. Bray stated that the Engineering Department feels that the existing 24-inch pipe at the northern end of the property has for some time served the existing 200 acres without any noticeable flooding problems due to the existence of a natural storage basin on the subject site. He noted that when the proposed fill is accomplished, the natural storage basin will be eliminated, and according to the latest engineering calculation based on the remaining 80 acres after the diversion, a figure of 22 cubic feet per second was established. Mr. Bray indicated that the existing 24-inch pipe would accommodate 22 CFS after the site is filled if a three-foot head, the maximum allowed for safety purposes, were installed on the culvert under the freeway. Mr. Bray stated that the 150 to 200 acres to the south at one time provided a natural drainage channel, but upon construction of SR-405, drainage had been diverted to the subject site as evidenced by removal of a culvert in Jones Road and N.E. 44th Street. He noted that the city would prefer that the drainage be diverted back to its natural course which would solve the current problems and future problems caused by development to the south. In response to a previous comment by Mr. Bennett, Mr. Blaylock clarified that increased development to-the south would not necessarily increase the level of storm drainage, due to city requirements for on-site storm water retention facilities upon development. The Examiner requested comments in support of the application. There was no response. • He then requested comments in opposition. Responding was: Mary Nyblom 8028 110th Place S.E. Renton, WA 98055 Ms. Nyblom requested clarification of designations for access streets to the site. Utilizing Exhibit #6, Mr. Bennett advised that due to location of the City of Renton/ King County boundary and conflicting street numbering systems, the freeway overpass had been designated on maps as 80th Street. Ms. Nyblom inquired regarding disposition of the existing swamp to the east. Mr. Bennett indicated that the fill and grade project would occur only on city property and not rroperty to the east located in the county. He also , advised that filling would occur a distance of 20 to 25 feet east of the roadway up to within 10 or 15 feet of the eastern property boundary, an open ditch would remain with appropriate sloping of the property to City of Renton standards, and existing water in the low areas will be funneled through the pipe in the larger areas for sedimentation and erosion control. The Examiner requested further comments. Joel Haggard indicated that although a discrepancy in the width of the required buffer on the eastern and northern boundaries had been corrected, some concern remains regarding governing regulations of the city, and whether conditions which have been recommended by the Planning Department are appropriate. He referenced two court cases, Gerla v. Tacoma, 12 Wn. App. 883, 533 P.2d 416, March 11, 1975, and The State of Washington, Respondent v. The City of Auburn et al, Appellants, May 31, 1973, to support his arguments that if any of the conditions imposed are unnecessarily onerous or not reasonably calculated to achieve the purposes set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, the condition should be modified or removed. Mr. Haggard contended that the recommended landscaping is unnecessarily burdensome to the applicant since shielding the property and its commercial use from single family residential development would not apply on the eastern boundary, and no development proposal other than the fill project is imminent. He suggested that Condition No. 1 of the Planning Department report be modified to reflect approval of the site plan including appropriate landscaping provisions by the Hearing Examiner prior to issuance of a building permit, but to delete landscaping buffer requirements at this time when only filling and grading are proposed on the site. Mr. Haggard noted that the amount of the recommended cash bond of $10,000 should be reduced accordingly and replaced by an alternative acceptable form of assurance. Mr. Haggard reiterated previous testimony provided by the Engineering Department representative that the drainage from the 200 acres south of the subject site had been unnaturally diverted by the State Department of Transportation to the applicant's property, and the liability of the state and city may be in question. The Examiner advised that the determination of liability is a civil matter. Mr. Haggard submitted a series of correspondence which had been directed to the City of Renton Engineering Department from �. J. D. Zirkle, District Administrator and D. L. Hoffman, District Design Engineer for the SP-402-79 Page Six Whether or not the filling of the subject site will decrease the holding capacity of the subject property or increase the water through the culvert beyond its capacity was in dispute. The applicant contends that the culvert will retain sufficient capacity. The Engineering Division indicated that the culvert can handle the anticipated 22 cubic feet per second (CFS) of water which the Engineering Division expects the north 80 acres to generate, but not the additional flow generated by the remaining +220 acres. Flow from the remaining acreage is now bound and held by the soils and plants on the subject site, a capacity it will not have after the fill is installed. 13. In order to effect the capacity needed for this excessive storm water, it was recommended that the flow be diverted from its present course (south to north under N.E. 44th Street) on the subject site to a new culvert system under Jones Avenue N.E. (approximately 50 feet of culvert) , and then connecting with an existing drainage system under I-405 and through a new culvert running south to north on the west side of the May Creek Interchange (approximately 195 feet of culvert) . (See maps.) • 14. The recommended storm drainage retention/detention system includes, in addition, a combination of rock dams and sedimentation control devices to protect the existing 24-inch culvert. 15. The drainage plans were developed pursuant to Section 4-2905(A)1, 6 and 11 of the Renton Storm and Surface Water Drainage Ordinance which requires such systems to be installed when filling and grading will occur on a subject property. The plans are subject to approval of the Public Works Department. 16. The plans must be designed to maintain the natural surface water flow onto, across and off of a subject property (Section 4-2909) . The Engineering Division indicated that only by dividing the drainage basins as indicated above could the requirements of this subsection be achieved. • 17. The applicant has not applied for an exception to the requirements of the Storm and Surface Water Drainage Ordinance pursuant to Section 4-2916. 18. The plans indicate an open ditch on the west side of the subject property adjacent to Lake Washington Boulevard, and that no change will occur east of the site. 19. The Planning Department has indicated that hydroseeding of the subject property is required to control erosion, and in addition, has recommended that a landscape buffer be established along the northern and eastern boundaries to protect the adjacent single family uses and mitigate the loss of wildlife habitat pursuant to Sections 4-2311.2, 4-2207.5(I) and 4-2206.2. The Planning Department has recommended that the buffer consist of no less than 25 feet of evergreen trees. 20. The main access to the site also serves as an important I-405 interchange (N.E. 44th Street overpass) . The Planning Department and the Police Department recommended that access be regulated so that ingress to the site is via Lake Washington Boulevard and egress, surfaced with either pavement or crushed rock, be via the N.E. 44th overpass ramp. 21. There have been no development plans submitted for the subject site and no plans for adjoining property were produced. The zoning of the subject site is B-1 (Business/ Commercial) . Similarly, property immediately northeast and south of the subject property is zoned for business,or commercial use, both in the city and in adjoining King County. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The special permit to allow the filling and grading of the subject site should be permitted because it will allow the eventual utilization of the site for development and permit the applicant reasonable use of the subject property. At the same time it must be recognized that the site currently serves as the surface water holding area for an approximate 300 acre area to the east and south. 2. The Planning and Public Works Departments both indicated that filling the subject site would tax the existing surface and storm water system beyond capacity, and recommended that the drainage basin area be divided into two independent drainage systems. The applicant would incur the costs and this is not unreasonable since it is the applicant's property which serves as the drainage basin, and under terms of the Storm and Surface Water Drainage Ordinance, the applicant must maintain the status quo as far as drainage in the area is concerned. 3. The system must be approved by the Public Works Department (Section 4-2910) . The applicant has not applied for an exception to the requirements of the Storm and Surface Water Drainage Ordinance, and therefore, the terms of the ordinance require 1 ? / SP-402-79 Page Five area, and no additional problems have occurred since installation of the facility. He concluded his remarks by stating that requirements for off-site pipes and landscaping are unnecessarily burdensome to the applicant. The Examiner requested final comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. SP-402-79 was closed by the Examiner at 11:15 'a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a special permit to fill and grade a +3.07 acre site with approximately 22,500 cubic yards of fill material. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject site is located north of N.E. 44th Street (S.E. 80th Street; King County) along the east edge of Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. The eastern property line for the northerly approximate two-thirds of the subject property coincides with the city boundary in this location. 7. The subject property slopes slightly from east to west and rises slightly in the north. This is also a depression on the subject property which serves during wet periods as a natural holding basin. Water drains from the site via a. 24-inch culvert which passes beneath Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. and I-405.' A spring located on adjacent King County property to the east (Tract 182) flows across the subject site. 8. The site is predominantly covered with scrub grass in the central and western portions of the property. There are medium height shrubs on the eastern portion of the property and scattered Douglas fir and deciduous trees on the property. The existing vegetation provides habitat for birds and small mammals and deer have been seen on the site. 9. The subject site is vacant. The areas north and east are developed with scattered single family residences. Site preparation, including filling and grading for a multifamily development, is underway to the southeast. A special permit is being utilized to fill property located south of N.E. 44th Street. West of I-405 there is a mixture of uses including industrial, commercial and multiple family uses. 10. The filling of the subject property will remove the existing vegetation and result in a loss of wildlife habitat. Hydroseeding the site will restore some vegetation but only the replacement of larger types of plants would mitigate the habitat loss. 11. The subject site serves as a surface water holding basin for approximately 300 acres of land to the east and south. Water flows onto the site from adjacent properties and there is probably some flow that was diverted onto the site by unknown parties in the past. The site, at least since the construction of I-405, has served as a catch basin for surface water. The 24-inch culvert which drains the site exits from the west side of the property and then travels under Lake Washington Boulevard and I-405. 12. In order to fill the site and not disturb the current drainage patterns including flow, generation, and the holding capacity of the site, the Planning Department and the Public Works Department Engineering Division have recommended that the drainage basin be divided into two basins, one of +80 acres, and the other, the remaining +220 acres. The +80 acres would continue to drain via the existing 24-inch culvert. The remaining acreage is presently served by a north/south drainage system running under N.E. 44th Street (S.E. 80th Street) which directs the flow onto the subject site. P_ 1 SP-402-79 Page Eight TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of March, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Mr. Robert Bennett, Bennett & Fox, 720 E. Main, Puyallup, WA 98371 Mr. Paul Butrim, Sea-Belle Properties, 3711 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E., Kirkland, WA 98033 Ms. Debbie Maroon, Bennett & Fox, 720 E. Main, Puyallup, WA 98371 Mr. Joel Haggard, 1530 Bank of California, 900 Fourth Ave. , Seattle, WA 98164 Mrs. Clifford Hoof, 7240 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Ms. Trina Hoof, 11030 S.E. 76th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Ms. Mary Nyblom, 8028 110th Place S.E., Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of March, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 24, 1980. Any aggrived person feeling that the ' decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error . in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. /://2 SP-40z-i9 Page Seven the Public Works Department to approve storm drainage detention/retention plans and they have indicated that this new installation is necessary to maintain the integrity of the drainage".iri the area. 4. Any prior diversion or diversions of the surface flow in the area and the liability of parties is not a matter reviewable by the Hearing Examiner, but is a matter to be tried through the courts. 5. The applicant has not indicated eventual plans for the subject site, and could, in fact, establish residential uses on the subject site. Therefore, the total extent of the buffering required should be further established at the time the use is proposed and the plan is reviewed by the Examiner pursuant to Sections 4-2203.2.0 and 4-2206.1. It is appropriate, however, for the applicant to install some landscaping in the areas recommended by the Planning Department in order to screen the existing single family uses to the north and east from the higher density uses the B-1 zone permits, and to "prevent blight by protecting residential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses. . ." (Page 17, Comprehensive Plan, 1965) , and "protect property values. . .through the effective control of land use" and "to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness" and to assure that there will be "mature plants for the new use" as soon as possible (Section 4-2211.2.B) . The filled, graded, level site, even if hydroseeded, will not'present an attractive appearance and may remain vacant for a long period. Therefore, it is appropriate for the applicant to plant a row of trees along the north and east property lines as an interim measure which can be incorporated into the ultimate landscape plans for the site. 6. In order to prevent erosion of the filled site the entire area should be hydroseeded. 7. Because the N.E. 44th Street interchange provies an important link in the movement of traffic in the Kennydale area of the city, access to the site must be controlled. A one-way flow of traffic through the site will provide an effective means of control. Trucks should enter the site via Lake Washington Boulevard and exit via N.E. 44th Street. In order to avoid carrying debris from the operation onto public streets the exit from the site should be surfaced with pavement or crushed rock. DECISION: The special permit to fill and grade the subject site is approved subject to: 1. Approval of the Public Works Department of the surface water retention/detention system. 2. Ingress to the site via Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. and egress via N.E. 44th Street (S.E. 80th Street) . 3. Surfacing the exit with paving material or crushed rock. 4. Hydroseeding the entire site or sub-portions thereof as soon as practical. 5. The planting of at least a row of trees along the north and east property lines; such trees at time of planting to be no less than four feet in height, and subject to the approval of the Planning Department. 6. Site plan review prior to the issuance of any building permit for any further development on the subject site. 7. The posting of a bond in an amount sufficient to assure completion of the hydroseeding and the installation of the trees along the north and east property line. ORDERED THIS 10th day of March, 1980. Fred J. Ka man Land Use Hearing Examiner SP-402-79 Page Two Joel Haggard, Attorney for the Applicant 1530 Bank of California 900 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98164 Mr. . Haggard referred to page six of the Planning Department report, zoning map of the vicinity, and advised that five acres of property located in King County on the majority of the east side of the subject site are zoned B-C, Business-Commercial, with the remaining property located in the City of Renton to the east zoned B-1. Mr. Haggard indicated that further testimony would be provided by the engineers for the applicant. Responding was: Debbie Maroon Engineer, Bennett & Fox 720 E. Main Puyallup, WA 98371 Ms. Maroon advised that although standing water may be observed on the site, there is no evidence of damage caused to the property or Lake Washington Boulevard from storm water runoff. She stated that a certain amount of damage has occurred to N.E. 44th Street, and east of that roadway, an 18-inch pipe has been blocked at one end. Ms. Maroon indicated that drainage currently flows downhill through a 12-inch line and sheet flows across fill property located adjacent to the subject site resulting in the cutting of a drainage ditch through that property. She advised that the superintendent on the condominium site to the east reports that during rainfall, water which cannot be accommodated by the existing 12-inch line flows across N.E. 44th Street. Ms. Maroon noted that drainage problems already exist in the area which are not caused by or the responsibility of the owners of the subject site. She also indicated that a complete drainage study was accomplished by the State Department of Transportation prior to installation of the existing 24-inch line to determine adequacy of the system. Responding was: Robert Bennett • Bennett & Fox 720 E. Main Puyallup, WA 98371 Mr. Bennett advised that proposed drainage facilities had been separated into two basins in the proposal to provide installation of pipes across the roadway and down to the freeway system as denoted on Exhibit #6. He noted that proposed retention and detention facilities on the subject site are mcre than adequate to handle drainage from the 80-acre area directly east of the site, but he felt it would be unreasonable to expect facilities on the site to accommodate drainage from the 200 acres lying to the south. Mr. Bennett indicated that upon filling and development of the property to the south, the two pipes can be consolidated into one, but at this particular time no particular on-site problems exist with drainage utilizing existing pipes. He noted that mylars have been corrected in accordance with Engineering Department comments. Referencing the Planning Department recommendation contained in Section M.4 which recommends limited access of trucks to the site off of Lake Washington Boulevard and exiting onto the freeway cross-ramp at N.E. 44th Street, Mr. Bennett indicated that an exit point may be considered at 80th Street which crosses the freeway. (The roadways were later determined to be one and the same.) Mr. Bennett felt that installation of two additional drainage pipes in the lower portion of the property is financially unnecessary because the applicant will not be developing the 200 acres south of the subject site which will be creating additional runoff. He advised that a headwall will be incorporated into the design system in the plans. Mr. Haggard, attorney for the applicant, asked Mr. Bennett to give his professional opinion regarding whether any adverse effects would result on adjacent properties or roadways as a result of not simultaneously constructing two off-site pipes if the fill project occurs as proposed on Exhibit #6 and the temporary holding pond improvements are installed on property adjacent to the 24-inch line constructed by the Department of Transportation. Mr. Bennett stated that in his professional opinion, there will be no problem with the design of the fill as proposed with storm water passing through the existing 24-inch pipe. He noted that extension of pipe under the highway and the freeway is calculated on a larger density and increased on-flow situation, but if no development occurs in the 200 acres to the south, the design for the site, including a hydraulic head of three feet designed on, the headwall system with overflow and provision of adequate storage, would be satisfactory and would not cause damage to the freeway. The Examiner. requested clarification regarding the location of the drainage pipes. Mr. Bennett advised that a pipe crosses N.E. 44th Street in a north-south direction, and another pipe exists north of that which drains the southerly 200 acres of the drainage basin. He noted that both pipes cross the freeway via Lake Washington Boulevard through the existing 24-inch culvert. He stated that the possibility exists to convert the pipe !!!" , March 10, 1980 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION., APPLICANT: Sea-Belle Properties FILE NO. -SP-402-79 LOCATION: North side of N.E. 44th Street along the eastern edge of Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a special permit for fill and grade consisting of approximately 22,500 cubic yards. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner ori.February 21, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 26, 1980 at 9:50 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed the report and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1: Application File including staff report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Topographic Map of the subject site Exhibit #3: Outflow Map Exhibit #4: Cross-Section of Fill Exhibit #5: Outflow Control Device Plan with Engineering Department comments Exhibit #6: Topographic Map of surrounding area Mr. Blaylock advised receipt of a telephone communication from Ms. Trina Hoof, 11030 S.E. 76th Street, Renton, WA 98055, this date, to express objection to the proposal and request that previous comments regarding preservation of wildlife habitat entered into the record on September 11, 1979, by Mrs. Clifford Hoof, 7240 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E., Renton, WA 98055, be incorporated into the record by reference. The memorandum conveying the requested information was entered into the record as follows: Exhibit #7: Memorandum to Hearing Examiner from Planning Department, dated February 26, 1980, conveying information from Ms. Trina Hoof Utilizing Exhibit #6, Mr. Blaylock indicated in red the location of proposed drainage lines to be channeled from the subject site. He also advised that Section M.2 of the Planning Department report should be revised to reflect additional Engineering Division comments. The Examiner requested clarification of a requirement contained in Section M.3 for a 50- foot wide landscaping bed of evergreen trees on the northern and eastern property boundaries which conflicts with statements contained in Section L.l, paragraph three, referring to a 25-foot wide buffer strip in the same location. Mr. Blaylock corrected Section M.3 to denote .a requirement for a 25-foot wide landscaping buffer. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, FILE NO: SP-402-79 FEBRUARY 26, 1980 PAGE FOUR • 2. The design plans show the use of rock dams and special, sedimentation overflow control devices to eliniina':e the problem of sedimentation in the existing 24" drainage pipe which services the site ( See Figure #1. ) . The rock dams will provide temporary and future stabilization of the site. The site should still be hydroseeded because an immediate use is not anticipated at this point . 3. The applicant has not stated the ultimate use of the proposed site, as required by RMC 4-2303(2)B; therefore, the site plans must be approved by the Hearing Examiner prior to issuance of a building permit . Since the site borders single family residential to the north, the intensity of the development should be reduced and buffered with landscaping. The community goals and objectives stated by the Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , on page 17, attempt to "prevent blight by protecting residential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolescence, and prevent the development of orderly growth patterns. " In addition, it attempts to "protect property values within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners, through the effective control of land use. " 4. The location and limited access to the site demand that a specific traffic pattern be developed in providing the actual fill on the site. Access cannot be easily obtained, when a truck is procedding to the east off of the Inter- change and wants to turn north onto the property. The site should be filled from Lake Washington Boulevard, which is the frontage road along FAI-405 in this location , and the truck should exist onto Northeast 44th. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner. approve the request for special permit to fill and grade , file SP-402-"79 , subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the site plan by the Hearing Examiner prior to the issuance of a building permit subject to the following general provisions : a. Reduction of the development intensity in the • northerly one-third of the site. b. Provision of a heavy screen landscape buffer along the northerly and easterly property lines in order to provide an effective site-obscuring separation of the business properties from the single family residential to the north and northeast. 2. Construction of the project in accordance with the plans dated February 1, 1980 , and received by the Planning Department on February 7, 1980, including rock dams and the overflow device located at the 24" drainage pipe. 3. Hydroseeding of the entire site and planting of a 50-foot wide landscaping bed of evergreen trees on the northern and eastern property boundaries adjacent to the drainage ditch immediately upon completion of the fill. To assure that the fill area is immediately rehabilitated, both covenants and a cash bond of at least $10 ,000 should be required of the applicant . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, FILE NO: SP-402-79 FEBRUARY 26, 1980 PAGE THREE • through proper development controls and procedures these impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment : The fill and grade permit will have no direct impact on employment. However, future use of the filled site will have to be addressed upon specific development . 3. Schools : Not Applicable. 4. Social : Not Applicable . 5. Traffic: Assuming 25 cubic yards per truckload, 22,500 yards would require 900 truckloads or 1800 total truck trips. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: • Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the • State Environmental Policy Act of 1971,' as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal. This negative declaration is further based on proper development procedures per City ordinances and the provision of suitable landscape areas to help reduce the loss of vegetation by -site development. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: • 1. City of Renton Building Division . • 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: • 1. The subject site is the lowest point in a drainage basin of approximately 300 acres (See Map #1. ) . The construction of FAI-405 resulted in allowing one 24" culvert to drain this entire basin. : Modification of culverts in the area ' could reduce the drainage basin to approximately 80 acres ' (See Map #2. ) . The site is presently used as a water . storage area of the 300-acre drainage basin. Removing 220 acres of the basin and allowing it to drain through other channels would allow the filling of the subject site as recommended by the Engineering Division. • ' The actual modifications necessary to the drainage system would include the construction of 195 feet of 30" diameter pipe from a manhole located on the west side of the May Creek Interchange following to the southeast to connect with an existing 24" concrete pipe, which goes under the main freeway lanes. In addition, a new 50-foot length of 36" diameter pipe will have to be placed under North- east 44th Street and an existing drainage pipe which lies . north and south would have to be plugged on Northeast 44th Street (See Map #2. ) . This would allow the modifica- tion of the drainage basin for the filling of the site. The existing wildlife habitat will be eliminated. The Hearing Examiner should consider some mitigating measures • to require the immediate replacement of the vegetation. .Hydroseeding of the property will only slightly relieve 'the problem. This can be accomplished by planting a 25-foot 'wide buffer strip with evergreen trees on the northern and eastern boundaries of the property adjacent to the drainage ditch. At the time of future development , the landscaping beds can be arranged and planted with vegetation which will provide a suitable wildlife habitat and food source. . •• .1 • 1).1.1,;....•:::\ nu ') ill/ :k /,-,, I; f:-:,/,-,,-..-.../,--:. --,-;•.-.....t q ;)••i 11.ir)3:"^-, 71,V/••'. • s 1 . )/1 ' if f' 1.4°' ' .11/ t; ' .(-...-:-.."."':.\';.: s.\ ;,(-‘,/111ti•-..11;\•;;....,,g '.., . :,:', )7••••: . . . , -•,. ' kt ;'...:.1; . 1.„,:•., • ‘; • ', 6,,,./ .1 , r•• ( ., rj 1 ••• 4.),•-• \ \‘',\ v.'ir':•0 .1,,../1*/- ' -NO I,,,c' 1 .,,...' .,. .. -s.r.j%) li•.•i ,., ,t. :I.. . - 1 N\••••••• 1 (-. I/ 'i ''' 11 t'zt,t/ ' ft, , ?) / , , \,, t•,. 1, ..., ,i,,_ .....,,. ... 1 s*- .:•••• 1 ' I ‘. " ( }' I I .e•.!,,Lf•'‘'. , i • -••••••••-1 .7\\. •• --"' • ' y 1 i / ' ' 1' ,...• _...\,,,./ , ',",•: ., ••- -1/4 ) --Y......,,:\ ‘ k ( ;• '' .:\ i ,/ 1 1 /. . -. \ ' • '.‘....,\:: ).•:•‘. 7 -st,, , ( ,,.. , 0.. . .. .-- ,,,,ct - f‘. .1 c,,--,:,,, ,... i..,jr. ,...:ki t ) ., . , i, i,./ 1 1 , iii (1))), , ji .,..„ ,,, f ().)/- .0,yli---- lk , , . ...\'-.1„. . .\,,M r..',,,',V. . ;: l,,, ' ..i.•( .\ ) i N / li j ( j s. ,, i • ,, \ t , k i 1'._ . :.:.'.:•:\\ \ .\.'i.,I , i 1: ' :5 j.()) , • I \.. / i 4f .!'..,.. A . )A ::: . 0, 1, '07/ _NIX )c7 i''' Y...-.'''''.. .•-•'" v• f',II,./-sa---v..,, ,1, i \ e, ,. v,t .1 1 ,\ .,i ..;!; i.• ) .•:,-•••.,• J 1 ,..!..,.'.-••::-:.., --. C ........!-..--- -\ ..r.,:., ;. , ,-s. -- -\., , -. - i ii .c. ,, i ,, , ,,,i,,, , . . , G.,---......../., -.--- .).• , ,,.- \.. ,'''•\ ," S\•. 1:,*/ • :./.,•-,....i,.......,•i...::,,'.'..,,,A•,,,i''r•,;1•.;..k',..,.1',y/-,1,I1•••"'\'',\'.._.,-\\t)\,,„,.„-'.,.„\,i.i...'' \i!,\/I,,.,;„I•./L.:•\,.,.•. /( i , \ ;!. ,(„..•'\\\••sA\\.,,\,•\.,\\.\\,\\,,,,,,\'\‘ff,,.•i,,.k,'.s!4-••."4„••„8 t,.4.1:1.'1.•,,s.,‘\.,!‘r\,‘1,•1,npi;.;„1•9.4•?4,•‘.') \ ,.•s.-•.\/1..‘•,k1',\1',•\,.\\IA\\(.,'\...;,.„i,\,',•Csk•,•....?-,-..rw,a,)(b..,'1,. .i))))(-•-(1)),/'••/t(/.••i 1 -,;.-.:_•:,-_'.-:':_.•.'•,-:':..'::.\,",-,'\4.1 11I..:...-':,.z......N:'.i-••.,r•.,:.',':,.-,,,.,../„...,.\.-\,•-1,/.,..-•‘.•.(I.)•..1/4.. 2.•...i,.• ,... •N:•.: • ..\ ",y-li ;ii( I/,, :!:••.!•.•-•... . .ki ::... •'-' ' ."";7';;', . ..., t i \.\ )) i \ , ' -7: ..)ii'Z-.--":: -.y..., ,.( ,\ ... . ("•(:....--,p.7..,;...", , !.1)eri., I \,) ,i,..'„:\ () . . ( - ' ( kc(C .•1.#ii '.( .: -•• ' 'I\\'"•f• • \• ..' i li'rt.' • ..- 1. \'1 .• ) • ' :. - • 'I I \ 1 i ),' , 1 \ \ .._,•, _, ,\\ •I Ci.1 I ' i• I i I...%.-. -';;;"• V .. ..14 .."... , ii 1.; \• 'i .. .,'L ' '' ') ././ .... \--:\ \\ '..\1111 .1.:1 1 (\ )'1Wkl((11.(/. .7.;:;..-1)/..:t3'Vit-,)f.A.. .,,,,,,( I 2it 1,.. ‘ \\ Til ') ,X ii.m \p ) '' ,,,,*' /1,42)•i‘• .`k-J.,..:‘,. :z..3.,-.11,1,1.10,21-7( .) ' , .. ,......: ..,.) .• .•:, 2,),. 1„\i,,\ -/I -,-:v.:..\\N\‘..1'.'1' "1\X 141k) \( .' t 0. ‘/ill( ‘‘‘. '.'•••'.': .:•\":•,...".• ••::.•••'7::::C13-/49.1341. '?\?.„ .,.,,. !•r;.•;:t/ .., . - •••s• i J.% r -, : 21 ‘i.f... ' ••• • ` •• • 'Al. (31' \1/4L `'.'"" -.; 9.1,.1 sl) I tilti ) yi .--.7".2/ -• •`:7•1k.:.3.7:\•‘,......?:•.V.-1,,, ..-,:',.•.......-..//: • •' /-/ .*.'''.., I • • ,•,, ‘ - ,\-1.• . ....,,.. 4.!.. t\1\''1 • 1_,;„--''t''' - ‘ ,.1 lc ifl-L,1(,?;--;‘S:z7:'.'1- --• '>. --.. •••,/ '1* •* • ' .' : ' '''• • ' • • . 11, • • / ) \f! \ 71 •) ..' . , . 1( -.f::-.!.)..• .-„•)'' ? Y,‘, \ k -'• / \ .\ • c.01. .i \-:*IL:.< '-**gil\ • ;•• , I. \ i l'1 i I.,I,iitrici;1-‘;‘1,1 ti.. . '..‘,. ti.....,_, ..,„‘, .i •y's I .') i , ,,k ) :\.j•',k k \\%/•••/-(..,IGI\i.... ..‘,i\ , )„,---... . .., . N.,..... i \\ ,-; 1... . , ,, , . ,;;; •ss.e.11 : 11..• \ i V, W ) \ '`-• \,•Ak.,\.) •-•_,J,, ,11\__. _,/,k1••\\ . ,i, ,1 , . • . (' ;',' A iv' . ,,-•. _.43L , . ..-\; .,.,Nsf,1\-.,: 2 \,_, -.„ ,••,:..- 7 ,, •.,, . ., , , IN..--11, :; ;•. \ -, :i • , 1 \ , ''').)) \ -../\(\ ‘s ,•••*•.(.- -- •-• --c\---H..\\ ., '.•• / ... • .• I. 1 :\'• !.• 1 ) .1 /'' , -•` ,L, 1 I . 'P 1 S ..1-1 ‘.4„,- \ ,,..2....:.:.,A.,-\•.0 •Nj...:-.::,1.:,:',./P \ •( I •Y\ i \...\_.i -. - i .,• i , N•"'.:•.1%!('`,. (41\--1" ‘-/jh . .,,!:11,1,1 1,•4 ,. . 1 .1\ ,i* •:• 1 •qm,••• A ‘,.. 1\ k- )\\t, .- k u .14.4, -.L. _.. .,.....-..,,-,-;,•,-/...-...:\\\.,...,...+A...,..,......1_ . 1ii ',...,.,!.;-,:..,,..:,,,,,• • . .• \p • 1,,:, ,1.. ) , . •, , ) \ , . , s.,.......„..,..., „......t„.7_,:....4,0,..:...„.....,.........„0 .1 i, , ,..: • ,,,,. .. . •,,),, t i.),•,,, i, _ i ( ( ' .? s\.,‘! \\,\"-:;.;..4..,,r•.,-•:•:-.—:-•zr"--ti:v..._-c.,i,.. ., -(i'-tIt\sAtr.)....,:s.;.:J.,; .,;)_:,s61r-N.,\-' :,..,,,,,,)(1‘,.\ ..,, t, ..\i• it: ) , iii k , 1 ( I\ 'N \*' ,'' ...14.'..: :.-?!.1 1•!S ‘2•;"%f k-''.:-"; . ''''‘\. t•I 1 • ' : ' •..i . ' J.)) ''. \ ,- V01101'11 ' 'I ,, ‘• 11 • ' •PIIICS A c)\ ,,), 1 -\ ,c ..... .‘„ '‘I \ A ''. '2"•••(• --•-•..C. a ir A /,',,..:•') . , \,.,•,:,:\ „. , A A, ;41: 11 •1 . : .' • 1/ ) 1 ' C. I I il I:-(. 1 \ 4eS 1) j '-'.kt•- '-':•,,.:-. ' ' • - '':•'1.c\:.-... •._::•'''''' -,-i• • , ' 1' ii\\ • ' • •I1 • , ' ' 11., ' t. \ .....-..), ,/,....--,. 4 : ....• , •. 1, .., -• ,/ .-•, -,. i•.. ., :. . .-•,( -,-, -.‘,., o • ..• ••• ' . •‘• •••., ,i i "•'.1,, .,.i . , ' t - - / t , .\ ----, ) i ( -:g•,./.--...__ \• , i .‘ ' t..• '4- -.• t--• . . i ) i i h ),. 1; P'....'.'• s'''' - ?...r. 4.. - --._ • • . .,, s .: ,s, ••••• • , I • ‘, •.• ,• li 1 , , • ;7" - .-.''....'.,•:-.:- — '7 .-`---7';-.N .•-.•t, ,.- . 1-',1,• • •( ' ' '•• • • ', '•,,.. ,,,, :,....,- .. 4,..o. • • i,-, ,,,,,- . 1 .....iko ,• ....... N, / . AP.' .11%i ' .,, -7f ...,. , ' , ( - '-, : '. - .., •. - - .Ii V1 :''7:'.4..),.•''' 1,..• t\ •1;1.:i `40.- ,'''"i,'•,1,.-,'.i C'• ,r,O-'...;'.'',' ..1\rA','.1''+• ',' #• \k,...• ''.:'''.'.,k'.,',.."i'i''•''k.'*g l''.el'xcit,`'''';''LI• I*4t•.(o,-:'-.•, "'-I,Si.M•-11-,•!.:;1-5,"•4--.--,.;:.- \''.-.'-,-.,::..1-.•7' :•‘ V; ..!•.:::‘- iit.i, i. ,i..1. •,7 : .....:-.... .,1 ,, : • ....., _. _ :., ,:. \,,. : ,1.;,) ,.i ,.:.0 5,,,,,\ t, , 4 1,;.;.,.., •\ e.f..-4 `.4 i 'i ii', ' -.' ' ,t.' f 1,•\;*A'r.-:,% .1'\V . I . \ • I 1 ' •• " ' ' • ' .•'-' j.,• '' ,' i• :1 .9tir \ . 1 .A i,',.••' •'1 i • •“ ,', ' .' , ,1 . ... ,•‘.......... '-•... .1 7 it ' \ ` •`‘ki!' ) . . ;,.' ,........' • .... <,!, ,(,,,,,, . -;.,- N',. • i ' . •;iri).ni,;: ,..,•,,r, i, .,,L(1,,...,„,..... .', ,I.1.• " ' • / I 1 \',, I. ' •• I I 1 ,i ( / '•-•\ 1 .,, 1 • I. ./.•',.\\ A iii\1• ' \1,3 • (••• f, t ),';', , !! 1,1„,/75ajai' ! . , ,...,_,'1 ii 11. 0,,,,,, ,) 1 '•.' ".• 1 "\ J' 1;, k I,\',:. 1- 1 )\ I •,14.. V1.99 ls• r . ; ..... . ) /47/:.' •. •'! k. ./. .." .1•''' t'k •• l. . it..1.\, s•,; 1\•/' * c'‘ . . el'' , :••\.•.1 •)1\ !; ‘ .\ ` \ ii) . .. . r• ." . .''' ... 4:••ily o!!'?; ttlitr .it . : • ;• -•••••I:;;; i' :•••. .;;• j 1( •- -,4I'. --. , ,„ . INffit .lit \\ 1 1 '.\ 1 • .......„ '. .; . 7 . ' ''' \ ' V.,:',Y1)1 ..Ir.":'7.7i7:',4A.."7. - , i'' I''‘\ \11\k,. , X.' .1(4f 4'':''':,4I .1,j'''.:. N \ \\ \\ V 1 („\ ,:,......,. .. ... ; . ,, .,,., . . '. .. .:i .,,,,ViriT.:1,;',A,;ilf,r,"-,7: 1....)r..,;,,,;,110:9,,.,..1,,l'i: , ,,\,',.,) ,,,.:(i.,,,:,(..4 1 7 -,r:i,t,,:.\,,i,:,.:",,,,\J, \,.,, ,.\,(... 1, )1,.\r,.,../ ' ,'' • . • : t'c't'',M(':‘ '''V,14 '..4. '.; i---- --::''Ntt\, •... \ •s• ,.,\,,.Ci. -- ' s I N.k v‘..1(i____7„,.„...1..... . , , . • •.• :. ...• • .. . , .• .. .. .,....4 1,•:. , , . %) ,, . ). 1 . sN • \'' ''''.•RNA anm • .,. ,.. , \ ,-) i -- ' - .•- --- •-•• ,,'• •., ; ' . ‘ 1 i i . ' . •90,((- 09, .-- .•-•.: 1\1: ‘N./tAv I( -•11.. . N. • ' , . / : \'‘' -, ' • - l' \ 1(1. I IV N:' /. • '' .1) '‘O‘k((•::•"Th::C' .--.-:-... ..,,. .`...:.::.-(.1s:,.7:-)" rf- ' ; .... . \• . ..... • • . . ., i , ..,,e ,..,,• ,, ., \ : \`‘\\0 ,..c‘\,./ k, S )* \1:" \\1(1* ; , . .), ',1,,,* t, ,z'...7:-.... , ,..,-..,,,:j,.,..:.• -: ... .,, 1 ., I, : / / , ,.., .. . ‘ \ \, ..1,, •,,;,s,; \ .211117‘.? tc 1 t i II",,,4 •••-.... /‘,„ \ '‘,,, .....,:xt.„\IIN,....... ...,-z..,,,../ J.1....:-.:...:.7-azz..........\ , . . . • ' '. /1 / / . .•\\ 'I'\ i.\\I ‘k)N..b.°1/*. I i ?* ):, .) (44'1•-i—..... 'V . &. -77':>-:;:• .-:.:::{ii,•••),...5f-: ',". ' \ i 1 ' / / • . . \ i'\ .. .., ''- 's..''''.•'•• •'\ •'.. \ "....{.4„...• '.)" ‘. •' , • .' ".11 .` ! . 1 . ' ' .V•\'\\'' '\ \ '/1 .i f!: / 1 ' • (( (1 'N ''''. V.Z•''',4 • ,›..? ..'f1:::. .:-...A::-,Y.) : / '),''',‘ \ st‘ '' • '''''''''\ ' : i I%.\ \ , ..t. V., •• .:.,,. •':,.',.'s•s‘ 1 . ) (( ) \ ''' •, .i: ;; ', I ." 'I . ///)" .I \,\ I, \ '• . ‘ ••.,\''.-X ...V. i ,' 11 ,,) i :• ' s(, ‘-‘).• \ .... . %••••:, •-• .s,.... ) ; 1 ,/ , t '. \ 7't a '1.. 1)\:::.'4./.....;-‘*\...•.‘s.,•;1c;1;::'''''''..-...::,14;._.'(''N.,`-''.:.:::/,1$11‘`C.,•‘?'.7..\..„.7‘,..:••‘..,. (.. • 11 ':',' ?".4 't,(1‘ ' /7/1# \ 1 \‘ '''\ l' \ 's\ \\''' . )T( ' \ .\ ‘ \ •"1 1 ii..•. ' ').1 's.•...'s'.:. .:''''':`'• )s s'`''' / 7 .j. i e,..• ..- -.. , . , 2,,‘„,4 0%., .. '•,. ..., r ‘.... \ ..! .. -..\ i. , 2 1,1. .. j ,.. ::,• ..., ,.....,, : :, i,,: .,. , ......, .. •: ..'- i..; .," ,,. • ., ,,,. ..., „....-,...! i\ " i <. ,.• -: .'. ...- •,•-. '-,)7 <-,• ,...,,... 1 .-• •..,,A,) ;;;,,,, • •;....•. \,,, ,/,.<„, y. • . • •.• ii • • ,••..7.... •N.., 1 ,. .. • . ., ., .. ,,,,, \ .\•.:, /i 1...1 .3.......s..\,..i.,..., .,..,..,,..., ...,...:,.. . ' c..!• ' x(4", '• /i ....',.....: .. • -.,. ' • . ,;.;)• ••:,.:.::••••,-..-..;,,‘ .„ i:' . \ \\:...... ,i. i. .\\ --- •'..,\')..... _..:.i-:•••••, . ..• (,//: / • .• • •• ' % .... h \ ! N.-••''''•.1 s''.*:*:'',) ,!: '.• •': \, .-'•‘.‘. ),:'"'It-If'. •• - ' - j,hi - "•.. :‘..•:::',.. .... '1:', ••.•.; 1\ ,`• :.,''-.‘. i '••••.,,, , -4..r. \11.. .r.,.• V.s .'/ . ... ' . ‘1 t ) i \\- / ' ,, . ..,... ...... , , • . • "TIM!. ' .: \ ..- • , ..,,,..,.••••'‘. • -•••• •• • ' • •• •••\\,, \`•,\..),.., ...;,•,, p,...,.,... -•,.. ..........!.•:‘,..: —,..•::. .... . .••)..._...l..._,•----,' 1106 r.l. . v! ... ../ •, . • . .• • - •-'•'• : . '-•-:::".• ''''•••-• • 1•Z.'.•••..-.•• . . --- fk.;1 • . , ,.. • ,;.,,,. • • • •,. rim,. .. s. . •. . 1 )1 . • .( . . „ (, . ,. . . 1 . ... ,.. . . lit•1311 . . -*I, .), •sz:„.•• • ••" , • , • I -',.; s• 1;:,1•:•,-V ,_. , .- - 1 ''• ' ' ) '-.;".' , ........:,. ---., . k ... .1 • ' l ,.,, .:•. .,t .., ... . .•.; •••• , -;, I ; \\• \'' `. ', ( /.' s\s II i .. ...i- \ V- - . •''-" \\s\ . .. . 1 '' • . ....„ • \ ' / el. • i. SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES •„ • ' •.: , . • . . - 1.1 . •• \ \ SP-402-79 . . .) \ . ' • 1/4. -, •ii ,.. • , .. t '.1. . .) , - . `11 •*,--,' • .. k.• I: r.- •'''*.• )1 ,i/.14... .';' '• ‘,:‘V‘:Z .s• '... • \ L'''' I, • 1,l'• ,i . •1: •..:‘Ik''' I.'. ‘s. -'.Y \ , II N ', \ t 1[I ei ' •..;', ''.• . . .;.,:III. :* .., \ '.. \ ‘ „-- .iii;\• • . . .., ._ . . . . , 1; , ,•1, ;• 1 r: I : •• -t .,..• . ',is.. i,, . . \1‘,‘ \,:,1.•----k* • i\ 1 1 •• • \ .s f;•ji: . . • .. !.....-: \ • • . .., !..6;;;;A.....:-., ...r: 1 • s. ,. . . 1 . . • -. - ..•. •-• a!!.••• • ?....„.•••••••::.,••• i \.. ! k •• • .. ,.- .; ' ...,.... - ,. • :••• ",..:, • • -1. •ii. .•:...:••,:. ,. ! . ..,...--1.--.......;,!• ,.\. .1.. ?!...- — N . • - ...• , . . • • *,/ r c , ,-- ., . . ,. !! •••••; ,,,c,,...„. .•:. ...., , .• . :..._...•_... ... •-;.,4, .. • :4-,..4 _.„.. ...••--........ . „. " . ...„,. .. s. . .,;, .:,. • il • „ ! . :,.. .z... !,.. i , ; • ... .. 1-•,,,..{.. , ..t.: / . . . .• • ,\.::,...." i .‘ . ., •. ii. . . ; ..,•::.:: :.,..,,c; i c. , Rose,wir... I. 4k. t-.......i. .:;0;.s.•*V..• ...../ ' ..... ••.. \\ .: .' •!'l •••• •. • . • ',. 1.- • \• .....•_. ; •: :', :: .. ••1 . . . : \ • : ,1) • i .II.MA '•1.•......\>.\,.y.• ... r3M, ''. :• • ."‘ :11 - \‘.; . • •': . • . 1 . i.. ..:-"..* "'' ",1',.- I. /* 11FINTON ' '" .( --' *--/ 1 . - . .• • • '... :••• •• •••• ,••• ••• • %, 1 i .. I .. ) . • ' ( ;• '„•• •'\•...‘ ...4/ 1 I 4 •• • •• ;, . • ' . •i..., ,. 1 SO :•,,,,• . , 1 .. • . \ ] • : . . \., 4. . • ."i . :0'. • 1'1 ' ..",' • %E...:, :! '' • ,.:.: \ \ 1 I 1 .,. 1 •:, , • ,... ,. '...,.;•...4.I. ..4• ..,' ,t\ '• - --------- ' ----" -0'iwit.1416•<-2,...1.:-Utal(41t.AL 54./11411.--.Y W441;•-•11, •-•'''''------"..-- i• Ao•••1 .41,v) '1;2 10' !'.63 $69 1•••-.i/ F,/It• • „..:ALE 1:2•1000 ROAD CI.ASSIi.ICA1 I mar• • ile:.ivy.duly emarommown•4•10) (ON /000 f III • Mt ... i:I,‘!I'.; .. . . iCOL, • ---• I ! . !. •*: J • • - , - - - - I E. =NE J� ��/ ciE +7H� ,° , , j r . .4( J if ',F.Ari"de ! •c / Qc ‘(`'c)\C / i S j l 1 'y V 2'Sf LUC_AT'0S. r1P� • ' i *U �' ;� r`" / l •. Qt „ , ..s. te. i :‘':'_1'. Sei ExHNCi S FufL �;, � / // rjf� fASt�'� • �+ �T cr ��� ;- -- -lJ f -- �, 1sr�P,1l S. " t• •• i O f t1 N. f Esc `'+ ��c I it I f s ,} SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES �;,' ./ {� �' ``�' SP-402-79 f j_ r= . • f7 °Z.,' ' .CC -,'-r- - ' 0---3.0'4' ,-_ S <. . ,/iy .. ,- ) .›. • i ?' . *'''' ..,-_,17-- Awr ,S.5' e"'-'i4- ii* -12 =CI = U-?"--XL, z". 7 _____ _ -__—_--______ __ _ _ _ ... , r .." , • # . // / : : -- 17 / - M a y/ . ' ... r e e — �..i • -� - 0 0 0 ,... / ,/< •:!-.'"P I, t1.. n'20I)\ _i, 1\:: - - - - ---- --- -__'�, .-_._�. __1- - -1:-; :!--. v.Z- i 1 ==I fir' - s,-•.:-.`-_„%,_.,.-...;.:: _ _...::.':•.-...I...:0.-_- ..--i-1/\,.N'sr,.l\,.l e,\'.•t !I.7 r-- -. 1.1 / Ci;LVERT • {. Lvi _ ,5�•r -.t :�i' 1 J p j 11'4E1'; 195' Length - ,y` i C��� r,C ' i`/ �l i�Ej'vCULt' RT L----�- . it . 50' Length I '• �30 Diamete ��.,y s -- - �� • , I. 36" Diar.:eteri .. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO : Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE : Sea-Belle Appeal - SP-402-70 The Planning and Development Committee has: considered the appeal of the Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision dated March 10 , 1980 and recommends that the City Council modify the decision of the Hearing Examiner to .delete- Condition No . 5 and the, reference to installation of trees in Condition No . 7 thereof because the Examiner was in error as a matter of fact in citing that the proposed landscape plantings would be incorporated into the ultimate landscaping plans for the site. The Committee recommends that the City Council affirm the decision of the Hearing Examiner as so modified. L � a Ra dy '/ hill, Chairman , Earl Clymer John Reed i ' • , ^ � 41 .49 VI 'Ali 87 79 66 wwm SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES Sea-Belle ±307 acres , TOTAL AREA APPLlCANT / | Via Iake Washington Blvd. N8 co»d NE 44th Street ` PRINCIPAL ACCESS — _ -- | B-1 Business Use , EXlSlING ZONING _ \ > EXISTING USE undeveloped— } --- [ Fill and Grade Of 22�y p50O cubic �--���nardo \ PR0P05E0 USE ' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN commercial \ � COMMENTS . � / ----- / ! --- \ ! ' ' . - l PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, FILE NO: SP-402-79 FEBRUARY 26, 1980 PAGE FIVE 4. Limited access of trucks to the site off of Lake Washington Boulevard and exiting onto the freeway cross-ramp. ' - • . 7t! "1-----•' ' - ' • .1';:,')7.t:r\r":•"'-\:•.::•::':)'•,,,•,,•/•1/•"-'li)•t•'• (..e i,ef'j,:i11 r-''.1----..:„-•"Z:.„4--.,.-:-.•V„,);•\-./<,.,j•,,,,-,-\,%1't.7'N,:t-\.--N.--.-(.=,-.-.--••--R.,\•,._S.--S,_/.-..-1.3.)-\.•.„,.•x1,,••,,...:'s.....•::__(-)1;__•_-„_•_6._..,.\,..•..-'.i,H,r:'I-;••,,,,!..•),1,;',,j..1•II,\•/•. • •..,,•\...4,....'' 1y-' 'f.'..h...d•) (1Ij',,.2 l 4c'.-1Iy,'i,,,./?.i'i 1/'•.,)<::/.',-..1...g"--•/---..-,7•-,.•-1-1..-\.''A,i!Zli,„..V.).:1',,,, ..---\,i,I •q--'A01=,_'i.-‘,_4 A(„.^/)I).,.-4-)jC'(,'..."9:.„'r„•-/'--4f----.-\.l..--i.-1.,V-'7„;•:-i---f.L / • .1 r . ) S101e J " : r) C.. 4 17r \ '•, i , V\ :ii,,-• i-!..., ..,•,' . A ' •.. • . ? V/i;),\II • ,,ii „,,3„51 i ,,,..,.._. ':i r.,s__,,, . , -• ,i'l 11. t\ .;•-jiii Illii)i(- --/-).\?::,k\-2.\,r..."-..?.---.•-: • .....:: .:'' ' ? ':.,.//7(7, if\ -- ---_,_•'' '(,\(, (_, •,, -L-z.---'4__ :-/-r4,_s ,‘' . 1 ko'r•e'iiii',.,9 ft )) ,) / \\ • , \ ) ( —Ail .2: '):•I-- I/ IkiljV j - ' • NI , 7-Z- - --- II) I .--- •-•••.-A i'')I -1': - , •C?t,81 • ,1? ' 3\ -1-, -. '1.14,\_„___ ) : - . f:::;_____s_t_ 9 'si, -`-•%AI I 1 : .,s I .11' i.q,,PA-, , (.\ •\,\\'.. ,,,,,l\ , ',,, i • \\\ ?)\ 1 1-.7.71 •••-.- 7- \,, I- ..•.,, i \( , 1.-;.r. , • /ii . Z.: i ri ' ' ,,. i\11 '1 ! P., .' ______/ ,f-2:\\\ \\*..1,\,• ,i `'•,\_.\C\,.....::,...„.:,.j.,--- „,',77:,_,..,..-\....„_::::,...„..."1:::_.....c.J ..c .----'--.7:,...7.- 0,-...?. ....,.! kr:;::: '1) " 1 I k(S* ''' '''. ;4:. , , ,,,„,,,,,.• f . ,. , I :•. .- .'16 ,;--..-(•,p,_-.7.. ,,,,1__ \\''';,. :f 1); -4, 3c,, ts,..;:c,-5 i , ' ;,,. , • : . • ..,, ii,•y. , ., -// ) .,---' L's--';1-‘5)1, ' :.. , ( ' I •i .7--\-- ) ' cl-\....‘ ' 11 11( -/';:-'-' .7-\9'-;'''' ----•'. )//---7°'•'( ,ii-A'');'-';-1 7 C ''r-.:..st. 5.: .1: -\' k 1 . 2- ! )k( ''''t m •P ' , \) \)V, S _-;1:1').1'.1 j ' \ . . ).... \20\ A .,,, B 114,,:',.,•• . .S1.11 e BMX. _ f -.•_;".,„,,\ \,i ‘,)) ,m• ,,, • . ,, '.^::. ,N • C:1. 1f\\)ilBN \ . I \ :•••••":,:' ,_, ' ''':..-'1.-11- A, I •'Cint 21;1. ,,/ ? ' --.„,----C, \,'.j „ , ,i ''''•-• " ' : ' , • I.:.,, j , ) ;E.; \ . ? n... ...-L„.L........r. ',I.Ii/I/,,),/ ,.: -.....', \ , • - , , l.-.' ,.\ . , ---• . /' . •\1\ ( .,.2_,...4_ ...,. 1_--c...._"--c\-1,(\k!fil , \:\\:-...-=‘, . '0 ‘:2,,, fiti',;:.„, ,:....'. :'•.k-, ,i), .:';‘ \ (\SIO. \ j-.'s-1-A C -\N. • 1 It' ue Tio'odr•.' - • .1.________•-______.,,,ir. •••1. I :11/ 1 -' ','':•••-, -7-‘'.1. : . 1 _." ;(: -----•'• - t ; I \k‘ )) ‘--', !- -\ /X1-\ 'j ilt i ; '1",•-• '\ : ' ./ ',\ , ' :;i, .; :', • :, ,, 1(,,, , , i\ . (,c., 435Lri 21•:'•1 4\'N\•• • '''''l• 9\ \_.,,,?Z...1_\\.....\\ ./., 2'.1.?4,.., , : •>••.,„-;1_...,.....--.---..,'. .0_ , _,- -•---- \„ • -- '_-•/-:IL.---\,_• . ••• • -siv ,.• . i !•:, i 1 \\,,...„.___ x4r,-;- -- ._-.\\- ,f,\, . !1•, „ ! 1‘.1(1 - - ' • •' . .11.1 'BM /8 m ' • - - ••• i•s *-• r '. , 11 .') :, ''., OA -----N-74-'' \.\.- _ 1I'"''.i 1 A.;--„---QZ*•-.1— .„ a _ , . .___ --- --i; ,- -' - \ ,.- & N.,..7-W-----1--•••-i. c1 -` • i . f r• .-r\.„ . I I' ' :' . i ' .' .. 1.-''':'r'''-'. ./.4_0. ;';'?i•ji ',. 2 x56-1N., A-, -i•'j C\'; \I‘ ) *'" I. .eki:..-.`,__,:„,.., \ ' ,..• -Pines . • ,• ,•[___ _,.. ,=___. / y . • - , i --, ,-,-.' . . / 1 ./ _, , ,,.Tap ri: ,'...... , ,,,t ,.._.,,,-.-„,..:,):-_s,-_v„-----__=---._\r:=f..,,,„-',--,„'•.,,.(,___ ,.:::,,,,.. , \\... ii111.. - x 46'5 It ( j:. ,..--..11. --.. -,i.....<,::•:-.-...c.;----"-:...:11\ ,.;----.72..''.‘[.. .....--:"•:''.1----5i-,1‘."'.s....‘i.•':',':1i,Z..\''''',`--T 4 c ) t ./ / - ..---• ---N 1 71 t)'. ...'' • '' '' '•- ---- \.- -...1 , s, . , . ••,...k- ..). \) ,..---,"--,-:,,,_________„1„_ I,___, ____( ..•. -----,---,----- ----- ----- ri `' \ •,. -Ilk 1' .' \ 1, .---'-1 i ,7 ...,-----,4•,. .- ------7. 7.,--t,m... ' ))/Iii - --. - - •-7-,,--.I (.----- ----- --7-1 --',',rf.----: ill 1 '''''''.- ---).t.., - -2-/-:-.-,7-,-.1,- '-/•„•;--_-----:_------li.,-.---71--1 .-\:=•-*--''-:;--....'-'i--\- , .3).:‘\ '..\_--.-----;,, : . r•-:‘,17: _,•i•• _tra 4t.S,',,,itiCk, ' ..::,.,,,:i:,'. '''..1.4, Ji Al..1 At. '1;i, PNS*I..'K''''' '-....r';;;'''''.` ``-.........1. ---:.` -.' ,,--. •-•A\1\,„!,....,----7\-:;:•-•11/',' C : \\...----- ii,- .,..,`'1-t ,-•,.. , •t. -... .k '.4.` A -.r, ! ' ' \d t!.:c'',,'' .. :ik'',:y,-i• .t. s."-- F., ---: S `,'.1-,,,...:,-.),,..3,y,Y,( Aw : \, - If----.• j....,'&.t71 •''''....:,` '*,..,'"I'S r4,,,,,P" g, . ':, i ' ' 1:''$1 & '1 ''''°'I 11 -.r----/ ...,,r-:*---•t'"•••,-3---\--,-.--',.\--';'-....--$1.-: -"...,'.\:•• 1 35t.\,( ............., v.4 ...t.,f. \ ,c_,,,q„.,,,, •__,,.__, •,,,,,,,,.,,!'„/.,, ••,, :,2,...• i••••4'-'• ';'4,3•,,,....• -1!7. T li.'..".4.1'•. -,°,...2:-.-.-4--"-QA--. --`,...,---,,,-... '-‘14f;\ ' 'F' ' O \ l'ee'`...s..• ' -Z,4- .\ '\ ,,.1 ',. ,•44 " •cik, .i,),.. ..y, -1-\---..Nrj:- .5-.,. .---,. ,----,----4-,x--- •,, ,l/f• , - '7. I., .,,-' , t=4" ,.P -- , A5 ' 064t ': '"•,' I , ,••4,,:e, "!. •ft; ' 4,0? \ . N\.....-...,z,. '''••13:: 11 "q \ TI\•- •-\=.-Rit' '\-/ •' /tra...,'Ir4 %•6,:, ,t••1 i,.4.11.,.t !...,'.'-.- ------() 1 ,,•1 *„,)r .',4 ...,4, 1,,,, ' •::---11\:--:-.N\.,, -.-.' if "/ - .--1-!;-.'-')\,. ;-t----c---P-__.(P.-' "'c• '-'''''...tlit „h'''''', '( : 1 ,• ,... \ \ ) -8 , ' • A . q1/1 ' . , ". ' ,.I \ . °:,'i .. ,Itrt . ,.,. riiptic .. 3qC, . .• •, 1 ,i ° / - . (\13•9Th1)0 - t• . 1'-: - ,6''' 1 t• ,,, . . . ac. ,* \ \ - /i, .., . , , ' C:Th 4 • \ — ' , . • • •-• .• ,••:,...,•••. ;•;‘,-,,,06;. , ePf- t . , •... ., '---, • • •• • • - •- . . ,t...%-••• , ,,,. . .. . .t. . ,.,... O. 41 '4,4- ' - Or PI Nii -.10. ••u,...,' J.r` _:---_ ,A'.:,:: : '4.` .1 . • 4 ; ..4,-- i.• ,L., .. v.sr, 7 •F•• ‘,.•••i- '),A! . . • . t , ,...••se • „,:„..,,, ciirs, ,e7 ,,,,,,,,,,...i , , , \ . ':,/r i•-•--c° • • 40, $0$ ' ••At,,...,•• . - 1 4,,,. ..‘A -1.\-1-•,',), ;:,..: 1.•....t'• . _‘:_._:__,...._..... , .___ -- ?-----.-1:1-7--,,,--- -v •-•-•..,,if . ._ • .• - ...V•'..cs,-4, .%t . .1 .,1,-., ,T- --- , ---•-‘- ... -\. q34&-,,„in-j__ \ . 1..,.._ ••)7..„, 0010 • ,- ' \\'•••••• (-6-02:-.::-.----- \ \--., ..•--.•<)••• - '41•;,-.,-- - 4 r , , ' , , •, -.4...nr,c q': ,A,', .-",,, ?.•,,c.,..,,/ ./..ry, . ,-,4%, .. - ,,•) ..., / 000#00 ._, ,....i,) , , \\....... ,• . •/ ) ,,,,,,k,„6„,_-:.:-.,.....,,,,,.... „.„....___,--,, - . J--.. „•• ••,,!.. 000 0 : , \\., • -- -,,,,,\,‘,..„, • . - op, / ,,,,;,,,,\•\. , \isc_.) fl,f4_,. ,, il .,,J - , ( ...,, . , ,,,,,z,,,_,.....___..........._ :,,,:_,:.-1,....„,_-, ,._, ,, '..ii, _.-.,, , ,,,, . . ,, . /—, : . , ‘ .)/ii ,,,,,, , ii / — 3. \\\\.\s,\ ,,v-,--.2.-_-•-----____- ---,:ls•_, d--r-y--------- •:,-,—_,,,,--,_: — ,..,,,-; , ‘k\•,.......,: .:,.5....---,..-..,,---,..„--_,_ . --,----:--- ,„_,•.„.......,11:, :,„_-_-,_,. ,, 1 .0„. , j, 7 ,\\ \\ ,\.,\..,.•••• .‘,,...i‘--...!ro,\ ,.I )1•, / 1 1 „le " •'` k. 'k.-.._>--)'\_../- P . D ,••-•, ..,:..- -,ks. , ,i'-...,---66 - ,• ,, I; . AA . , Ay . , ,.i, • ,v 1 ... '. . li.ii A ,, lisfrt k • ,, \---\ I; / /// I ''':' : ..i ' ''' lir; 40/0411 j'A. 1 '. ... \:::....\\. \.\:„.\,:\ N 'If :://c l' • .. ..,-,•::: (2:21.4,..uNi7\1\\‘,..,..";...z:-......<'::\''''N-N-N 1— 1--.-5.Pr ..--‘ --).„5„)...r i \-..,..f. .•‘H .-,i-, - / r \ \\ \ ; ,,At , , .\\___\.:: , \N ,,•_,,:-..,..—,,\ ,. i. ---i:,,,,. al.r,-,.,.6,,.,,d, - . .. . , .4„...„,,,. .„_,,\ ,L, ,N,,,,, ,, ,, ..,)\,-,---......,---, , \\. . ,,, .)- 6) ,-- -,.---•-.',-1:---,--sz\',,\J ••,,?,----:,-:-) yillT,•..,: .,e/P\ ',.dr- ..,.,,,: ,...:•:-.... „,..,....,,.--.7\.\,....,,,,.,,,,_ .,,, ( t. 1....,,,: ....„ \s, ..,.,..._,iii, . A -,..---_,'-- .1-" , \.__.-------:-.:•-,,:,,...._' •,,,.. __-__- -_____•_,,--J •....,------::::„.•••.,2,,....,..,„,..„--.4---,.....„-_,._ .., .; , ,,,. v,...,. .,,,1r ieir ...,....„.„-•:/ ..‹.--.-----4 . • •\-.\- N--..., ..,.._ , :.,,,,,?la .,, . , ....._. ... „..:-...,,..•-;,,,-.:.2 • . A,). -..., • ,..i, .:. •, ..., -,N,.. \\....\) •I\..A.,:_l_..,...,..-1 4 16... ; „.... .--...-4-.----•_:,r.,,.-.7;..•,.!.--,-.--' • ...-. p 1 •••••„ ..,. ,. ... ' . . ---,), \. _,______.-, '',:- .,-.--.--. -- ..• 7-•\./-i; .,,:f ..-, , •.•• •• -...,_ •-•,-,...---,,,:-...;...v..• --" • ... --18;`-`1-.\--\_.,'- \ ,__-z• • f. " ;1 (:• '..,,CL.-- ,' • . •--N,.. ,,,,,A./..,--,--•/: . /p71, 7.„..,,,,_,-.....-----..-.7..---___„..„.... ,i....-7/A••\...:,,,,-,,___-•,;.• I.•,.,: ...4\ ,../7 5,„,\ ) 5 ‘,..---N \‘,..---,f-'; :;,-7,' .. • I , l ,•:• ,..,,,-2:\2.,2% ..,,----1-'7.----...`:---_"f•••,-)ifiCc'cr ',.:•20 . ,,,..,:cp/// / •••••••• •••., •'.5•.:::,•.4.., /1,.._!..Il ---„--=----= i 1.,,\s, N' • --",'\\,....- •-1" ....---Z.72.7.,-.:'(„,,,,, i ' ''-- 1,,....'• -' .t. -'--' '''"'"v_/\''''.\.,:-... .-- i 's '•.-.,--7-. : ••,,,. :, .'',1;,‘::::::,:,:,.,',',.,„:- ----,:. ----'"-- --..„-4,.•\..\,, .-.------.1,...f."....'....,„. ...,-7;',,,,/,/,'/ . .• ...TA,,,.-_--.,:----,,..-, ....i.,;...,,,,-_.„--,-...;,-,„.. ...- - -,./ A \ 0,( . . <1,-,.-----',.. ..„—---_,>--:-,7-_:_,_•- , 'N',. --,:::-. ,- — ..-- — -- ...--,---'..-%/ 1 ____•__-_,-----•-- • ---,-----•' <,,s.:.-_--:-..-,L,•)?.6--,,-:----=---,;----k-r----7:4•:-..,--'-‘,..._ .:.:-..---;----.'-',--ti±- ..,-.-,7- _,-7....... -..,:"...,-,-;,.,..iii.:- -:--lt --:---,:,•-,:-.,---..,._.-,.--.--:,----='-:_--,:.------- ..,------ .• \ ,3°6 .---',•.- _.. • ---=-----tt----->-----_ _----"--NI • ‘l • \,. •..5.,... • --_-----: — ---':;..,..-Ny\ e.,,,,--_, 4.---7,2",:.";',..;...--fTht,--- ....„--_,-.::-./'--1.7. 1 " ''',. ''.::::-.,-,-, "\...,, IN \_,:.77.---- .-7;;-•--=','-:------=,in--.:-----„„, , n''I. '4- 'V -------'.-----.--- --Th‘. _,\\,....qem,„,...„.,.,...,.,.„.2se,-,,,- -. a,. ,e:. , • r"-- -,,,,,‘;`,\, ii- - •,,r.------....„--,,.- ,,••••,,v1).-/P •••••,,,,u..-.:k3t_11„\- ----:- 1,,--..-- t\-:Tit..,-,-"----•\\•,....--;•••••:,.., \( ,,,,-......,.. -- 319'•c ,__I..:----, -- ----', (--,_ ..,N1.,......_ . ---____, .y••. .„.N.. , .. z_.,... \ ,., ,,,i,..-._-f.f.,--,7 ..• , .. ••••_-•:_•_,..._,„.....,IL. .. \.......,4;,..;:i.....::::----,-. ,. \\ „Bm...,3).2......--.-_-----...._•-•--....--------1.---.:.„,:---.-- . , ..,...----.:,.....--...‹.„---:•,•\. \ , . ' :••' I. . ' - \ ,-,.- .,•:.•—t-----,---••••,---,-;?•_,-.----•-•,\ %,1 -- ' -.Zz_••:..:-,--:".f:-.---/---._ '-' .. (' ; V . .....‘,, ,•,;_::----- ---->"-;—.` \-- ' `'..... \- '''',‘`-' I ..1 V . . •-- •PN1,•..3 - __,,- , ,- __:,-;._--,...,-.---_:.:--=------2.:-. ,•, , -,...' i„,,, \\...;\\ ,,.' ( • , , •••• ----\ i ..11...f., ----,. .________,... .....\ , . ..,,...1 --,,,:•_,,,. -,.... N....._.) :1,1 \--,- ) •f : .\ \ \-,.., \ •. ..,,,, ( SEA-BELLE: PROPERTIES \. I:.•••-,... ,..\\,,, .t.-------, i ) - • •\ •• 1 "\ • • . ,---\: .•••2\s, ' :t ,••'' .• SP-402- 9 ---N \• \•t-z. ,,, • 1' I I '.-\ ' ),',:,' , ,. f •,..„,\.\;.,',\,,\.\\ ; .'\ 0 ..,\ • - I V_ \- \ 1 . . . . '• - ‘" :: ' '' ' ' ' s MAP 1 . •-•.. \ l• , ,.,-\) . i . ...... .. ,,•'-- , _I, • ,••••:-...E.:-.--:. . • - , ‘‘,..., _______IL__J, ;..,....st..,• I -\_\,,,, \ . ! . . .).. .• ' Si,%. _•,'•••'•'" 1 •••117.-----71-- -If -,1; •,, \. .,, \ C._ • • _ N .•(,,,tt, II ._ ., ,, , ; , , ,,,,;,, 12,.:,., ; .,,,--,•::,,,,i;,\\ ..,\-.,,...... -• if \\`' it .''5 I', .11-. 1 i.1 1 i i:\ - i. i • •\'1 - '3%. t \. s \s`L•ti .:. '.1\---j • (.) ' • •\\ \ • ,•,.. . •. ,....- \\\,,."-, •,-1, ••1 'ir i / N.;--....t.,-,'"--•-- -----re .1 \ •- \.. \ t ,.. • ) . ••• . :. - ., - ••• ‘,.\(' t•-I,',,,,,.. 7: ../1,(_: '.. :2 -•.,,,•@''I'..,:.'''.'2.1":1;', • ! '377 ` .'".' .r.': \, • '-' 11 •- • \ ' ----" ..,- -,, ..,..-., ./... .\......"', ''...A ••• •e",- .7, •'. I s. \I-. • .kilr.17.4 1111., '' : i • ''' •ii\ •r; . :)'\ -'-''' "-------'.--- '' * \.2'7:( C .7-. / . • \\, .. . • " (1' '' \\ 1. (la-, 1, \ ‘:. • i I ••,. •••('••%. ') 111::.:-. .'.'2-1if i 1 7 •-•-•. . .... '-`k : -•H., ,_ ej- „0.;•. / • •• --- 1'• . \• r-. tr,...• 'Fk_,) ./--', sA, .„, . : . .1 .‘-,., I ......,; ,...,, -..'.,• vr.1,: 1 .1. .\ Peservorct...---. . •\- ..,. • • ',. •..- • --- -.- :, \•• Bm• ••A.• ‘, \\ -''''-':',1V\. *.., % • '•: 1 ° °);--.‘ 'rn.' 1:1 : _:_1;t__V',1_4_ li:,'... ____.,_:__.. _______..Li i. .__.7_.___,..__(_..____.JIMA --'' :.:.-_ . 1.\_.__...,__4!**1 ;• . . 1 Y -1-4,s-• -.-\---!'-•-t: •" • ----` •I••=.-4-,--1-"Ir------ •- V •: *"• • ' I C /' • /-4r8" • . '‘- \\i".:1'..: •1164... ....• ( -7-7 j.-1-tl.")-)i .• ''.---.tIP'7--- -:11' ''\ . 'i 'f'•7-1.1-',7t ( ol: ' 1ZENTON \ - — ‘_ ( \ 3 0 . : . • --5,,,, „........;-,\; , ,.. ,, , • •..•. „. . „g,:r vo ?„,:,:,.., ... , \ . c , • J7'• v .. ,•):,--•:'''`, .\ :‘..--)\'''y.• ..C.:-... .1 1: iii:.,.."'",,,''' \ . `' s,) ! \ 1 ..*:-1 ( :''.1 \.V•ii, . ‘ ' - • . . .' I. • I'L,1 •,1' /,' ' , ' tl e" ••,1 , ,{ ....,-•\..,‘•.., • •• f,e.,.• ...i,i,:. ,,,,, ,,, . ,,-..... - \ h ( • ,, •..• - \ . T - _\ '54* ., • - i. (REN7 o '62 -I 16"63-"I ' ..._____...t.Y..• L.....t.'"Fa.• •_..f..__32...". lo INTEMORLGEOLOGICAL SURVEY WASHINf N) • 565°' • . .1.57s • SCALE 1:24000 ROAD CLASSIFICAT 0 . 1 MILE 1 ; • ..37-'7" ---.— —- - . Heavy-duty......--- , 'tow 2noo 3000 4000 500 ---0 6000 7000 FEET .- , Medium-duty ..,-........_____ --,, I I .., ie.. V To.„„;.,:•• \.---.....—-. 0 i i l' ...• .' ''. �-I El '!co. - v 0� 9-- . //// • ! / �i -- -- -- . 1 I f _ . / ii_ !', .. !! d' -Fr*— SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES 0/ ®' t '4, 44-A SP-402-29 2 - f° Y MAP 3 l , , : a r e e ! fr 4 .ram _... __-- , ti • s i• � 0. 0 ' 4 = y 0 �184I iL3�` r� � , rcar►. c : I. / t • • f,. r — ac ., , . `—. 41 / NEW CULVERT ��•,. NE4V CULVERT e 15E r,LER 195' Length `� 90 Ac 'b t, 50 Length30" Diameter 1 1 -' •... -/2 :/'/ tt- 36" Diameter h 1 1 E s p �: 1 . - 1 a . I- !.. I ; . • ir ----0 C31-.12j. CC ',..1')SIVE ' 1 • 1.) ; F..0 . AND Nuis z_ry, e pec!: _ _ . - , _ . P.:j _ _ ._ . __ _ .., --, „ - - . _,,,. 12(7).4"_-_---, '•:-'-/ - 42..________. t / ,--(.5.z'5' z' . - ', --,-...-7..:,-,•,:-,..E;-„,-r E.-;_c..c.:- '''7' --1-• ---,..fi.:,i I+,i.---,,, 7 77 / / 57:L1P-5- _, .,-:.-•:,-,m, :.':.'_•' ,i- t.':'," - I ,....- i. —_ ... ,-- ..• , L 1 7 F- '..:. ; 1- 4---;,'•- '. ."'--It"'"'''' •'-117:\ T -->- .c.---:,4i-_,_-_,,_./ 1...,/,_4., .;. F.7-..An',77- •- . z' ' •---rilPLF1 •:,\ I' 7e >--..'-'1,-.3/.,, •,-,_re—_-• .,. . ..„..._, . - ',..,• , -. . - ,".• ' „......3/".' 7\::> .„, / c. .t 1 I; [ •....,-:.-.& --:-..-..:-7T..t.:. / '.._7._..; 4,-.-.)-,-7,-77-,,,,- :,. ' i':.- . ... (--,- ..' " k 1 1/4(.''' , • / .. i:r.l:ll- / i 1 1.! e.--.. , . / _ .___J :,..---\•. ‘,`/E_L-.DF.,—; -r(7'. / v..rn 3.\ ".-- NVEER.. F. . / . = 1 ..... i z, ' ,_ .;4' ,..1 /1'/ ,\ P,,r,,..._ 7 YY:1.:.• - ENID VIEW •,/.'ff.!.-- SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES i . . . • "%• • / 4 ' ,.V. ;. . 7 7 •-----„?..---",- -:_c:„., , , 7.--; ,-,-., 117,',..72.:.-:e .--r_.,., SP-402-79 i . ....4„.....,!:j.,.;4,... .-., •,.f..-• ,;'-'-fr.;;;...A.,.-.f.i.;.A.3 i ' ,tl• -..- ,II' ',Low •• - , • • - - -- - ,_44- ------- 0 ,-;.-• ••- 1 • FIGURE 1 i ....,... 1 . ', .',.'•,.."-,1.--.:: .. _ _ i . 2.--.';'=_P,'E.:_. (-:7-fr''', • . 1 .• . • i •,, i AFr!:'E_ _..., : .e...,,/.. • ---,-- . >.y.,•-...:;/.I . . OUTFLOW CONTZOL DEVICE FOR.. DETEN1TION POND Z: ,,. . 1.4 0'7 TO S C..A.L.E. ._,2.• • '•' --I ':- ., 7:-.---1- t 1 -- - . : 1 • e s R. E.Eki,-,.. sfc - -- -----..-- - _•••-..._.__ 4/ ____,•-:_ :...• - —-- ' I i3s" ,oi 2.... '``,1,-'•Nfi ' 1 .A. ,0.• '-1,%„tic--4, i, `") •'' .11711,11'7'; ' I 7'.,,. 2._,_.,/ci • I• tk,71,21 ,/X 1 FL-A.C...E,...,.i•- TO,.,-,1 . 0 _._ _. _._.,... 1 . ---•:.--,..g.:-:A•. - c-- t,(NX. .'''.•"/-1/4' / _.......-.:[.- -; --:•'..-- '-' • C ti,,,:ft, .1°.±.1:221.'...>,;•7 / P.s.L..t....7 0, I Li T ERVA LS s ......ei 01.MN, -512LL TO t, (silOr.M_ ../. i 14 TE R_I-OC: II-4 C.. : 1 5 - .. .- . -- •• -- •4.•,•;• . -- IN TO I's,i AT U R_A.L. 6 R.001.45). _--- - - -...„ ---_ ___- -- - i iI - -- - --- - - -- --- - -- - - - - - 7f-„•Die,:_/- IViC/7 Cnacf'S t7EC7-7,a;i7 TYF'I GP..L SECTION - C-1.-}FC.k•- 1:31A1.4 1 , . —- „4;.,,"...---,,',`• NO TO S GAL-M. ' . . _ - - — d 1m®4� Ctli" �o-� i 0+405 • o,co 0+40/d 0460N !r20,,' 1160,/ 2*002/ Z+4 // 2+Ct0/l „iv.°0N 3fLOil 4•00A> 4.40,N 4+GON -5'20A' 5#60:1 6rOO.V SCc7/ii/ C -C . • ✓r20 A`/ SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES T4 SP-402-79 FIGURE 2 nor -- ---�— a - - — -\ ------- - -- - - - a `',` cars 0t4� 0rG0 0+40N 0+•J"01/ /170!/ -1+50/'i 2r,?0,'/ 2>�'/1' G'ouf.'" ,..+2,:3,1' 3•',.-.1 4i0J/N 4+401' 4+80// .5+20.4( .51ti . <5;cc7-MA,7 . Denton Planning Department: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : 5PEEPbbf P, 1 ,"r'CD r Fra, '' ode ,"2-Kle. '," 01.,75� te , � Location : s' �; Z. ( �'fa '���^ � /� �V oh p, ;) V ,STr,/ 14 V. I C Applicant : Seek - de a. Awtr' i63. _._ , TO : - Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :, 7/fl/77 , ; Police Department A, R, C. MEETING , ,,_ 31./.10 . . Public Works Department v Engineering Division 1 Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fir, e, Department OMM:NTS OR SlIGG—ST ONS REGARDING PIS ADPLICATION SHOULD BENOVID D IN �,l1�IT 'dG FOR TIE APPLICATION REVI_W CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON a- P AT 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE R014 FIF OUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WI LL ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 PM ON .6 2,17 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -3.:_,7 ; .... e=>._.--1 ,�- - - 1.„1_ Approved Approved. with conditions �L Not Approved si • / I 11 I! I • Signature of Director or Authorized Representaki-ve Date REVIEWING''. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : = , JJ _ ' Approved ,.\' Approved with conditions Not Approved • /) 1 7.-'-:(77(/' ,- e --z- 1-1.,.. 7-22,a---A.,;t'-e1-4 .14-' z2,,,..-,4-- /,,y/ — t.. .. c,.,„ 7v.^ ,,,..„....-.C-`. �.C.-V'L.v--t_-.. ,,,6,...d•✓.. m ,L. �L'.t .„... ._- _..._.._�, C/ (/Jj / 1/, fziO) AU%� 1'' Cr,.'-..w `.�� 1 Va �r Ti gn,ature', -of pi rector or Author,i,z Representative — Date DEVI ^ • PMENT APPLICATION REVIEW EET Application : r rfif eca. (sp 96cQ.75). . • Location : . o Fi" dt p h ,� � Z f ' ? m—, t� , e , ,R' 1, t �.. a95/4S' nit A Applicant : $,�e' e e i9_ paw6'0, TO :_____Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ,'`' Police Department A. R. C. IMEETING_ 8/30/ � Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division i Utilities Engineering • Fire Department �fV��1�d�IITi IGP�F�f�G1�LT���LIC��ILf'II��VI�IS A�P�ICAT�OP�ARC)UJ�U R� ,D�OVIDED lJ COVF I N _ � .LD ON Al 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE RD . Y_F O UR DEPARTMENTTDIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT � BY 3:00 PM ON . /79 REVIEWING, DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: =�� ,/J�- Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved / ice,,rx'x S 1- eil - ,0e-1 c'.ja/l• • Signature of-Director or Authorized Representative - Date REVIEWING, DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : - Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ' Date • Renton Planning Department DEVL;PMENT APPLICATION REVIEW Application : r .i)/1/7y40 111 c'ereLde (Se • • Location . ,� �� � '� � � � t` �- �] ��"Q{Y�,pp/,!n/��+Y�fff�jjj .�w qg /f��y/�+�' / /,�A�Jyp R ,p��� �'`/��}�y//�� �.'�� �rrn B i S.( U �4d�+'�d j'We�� i J 11, E a VI_._t S� 4 r e,ncs . �'+4 S ( r i 0' `p. .s mac+ • pp1 i cant : TO :, Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:, / Police Department A. R, C. MEETING 3 • Public Works Department Engineering Division • _ , _Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering • Fire Department • COME 1�TS OR � GGEST ONS R—GAR1)I G THIS A'PI� .A ON SHOUTPROVIDED dG FOE, T HE AF LICAT ION REGARDING CONFERENCE. (ARC) DD . � AT 9 :00 AM IN THE 1 I�I Rp FLOOR CONFERENCE RLIJE„ '1 \dOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY S:00 PM ON 4 1 1 7Q _ --- —=- - - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : / � Approved _ . ___Approved with conditions __Not Approved • • s i nnature of Director or Authorized Re i e ' P7 '_ - IresentaLlve Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : :Approved Approved with conditions _ Not Approved • -Signature of Di rector or Authori z6d Representative _—� Date DEV/ 'JPMENT APPLICATION REVI Elli TEET Application : 5 P ?A ._w_Pcsaamr! t. Cr"(rye (S — yo. q m' • [] 1 4 t_o c a t i o n :�, S a`C4 o'sz:����i%_Mk . ����:a" e►�� ,��CB A ...�1, .SA4e S 11:44,� � '' App1 i cant _ Tea ee olh 7P02 ' , R TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1747 ;%'Police Department A. R. C, MEETING gidp Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department rp QQ ��II pNN aapp THIS �N`�I��ITI dGP�F(RG���T�PPLIC�l IL�IIP-�EVI��II�CO,�F��CATT, OP SHOULD BE PpROVIDED FENCE (ARC) i 0 BE GILD ON F OUR DEPARTMENT DIVISION :REPRESENTATIVE��tiIILLELO NOTRBE EOABLE TO ATT N THE ARC,, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:UO PM ON , O/479 0 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE Approved xxx Approved with conditions Not Approved 1)Entrance to the site should be off of Lake Washington Blvd. 2) Exit road from site be onto S.E . 76th . 3) Exit road be paved or of crushed rock construction for at least, 100 feet so that the trucks will not track debri onto the roadway. 4) Area be signed with proper signs as required by traffic eng. 5) All roadways within the city used for the. hauling operation be kept clean from//d ri . LAC ✓1, _ _ 8/31/79 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date• REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIMS%ON . 77t—//qF Approved, ,/ Approved with conditions Not Approved 41ct!/�l• 1 ) -c"lam, , / �. ,`• , c' • • • ,/ % G.; /7 C",- Signature of Dir Repr esentative entative ector or Au. iorized Re � • Date 4 PROPOSED/FINAL' ':CLARATION`-"OF SIGNIFICANC 'ON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-402-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-494-79 Fri: FINAL Declaration - Description of proposal Applicant seeks a special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 22 , 500 cubic yards. Proponent SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES North side of N.E. 44th along east edge of Location of Proposal Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : Reduction of drainage area by construction of two alternative culverts. The drainage area reduces from approximately 300 acres to approximately 80 acres. Environmental enhancement measures to be required at the time of development to mitigate loss of wildlife habitat . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title ,P /a nn,�2g Di1ector Date February 20 , 1980 Signature,-A j i' /'. ' City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 r 1. • 4 I HIBIT 1 . January 7, i^80 ITEM NO. 5f yo .2- 79 13e ri nell-- go ,c To c.• RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON City of Renton '' HEARING EXAMINER Mtrticl gilding FEB 2 3 1980 2i�. ell Avenue South AM PM -ftenton, WA 98055 7,R,9,10,11,12I1,2,3,4,5,6 CS 1744 SR 405 A Attention: D. G. Monaghan May Creek Interchange Drainage Gentlemen: This will transmit the as•taehed letter pertaining to a culvert in the May Creek Interchange vicinity on SR :05. Another purpose is to confirm on-site discussions with Mr. Winter of our staff on December 12, 1979. It was then, with Messrs. Monaghan, Bray end Phillips, that the 18" culvert at SR 405 Station 454+54 and the 24' culvert at Station 0+00 were observed operating at less than capacity while the 24" ally :rt at Station 10+50 was serving' more than its natural tributary arca. Several schemes wJ re discussed which could reroute water more to its original course and mitigate the s' tnptoms being experienced upstream of the culvert at Station 10+50. The alternatives, es discus,:etl during the field visit, involved a connection from the Jones Avenue ditch to one of the culverts at Stations 454+54 or 0+00.. The general schemes are displayed on the attnehmcr.t: A alternate will make use of the 24 inch culvert at Station 0+00. Open cutting of ramps cannot he considered, however a proposal to dire under pavement could be entertained. S alternate will route Jones Avenue water to the 18 Incl. culvert at Station 454+54. Secondary construction will then he required at the outlet. This could . be additional connection C to structure note 1:1 or improvement of 8 Inch pipe D. Alternates A and B simply address water in the Jones Avenue ditch. Invest1g.tion for this letter indicated that a goal to route water from point s? to alternates A or 11 would serve the area in a mnnm r r,iorc similar to the pre-SR 405 condition. The pre.-SR 405 condition appears to be indict;ted on tluc 1.950 U'SGS quadrangle maps. Old mapping end aerial p otogr ,phic data is 1->cing investigated to confirm the accuracy of this quadrangle sheet. / • City of Renton January 7, 1980 . Page Two • Implementation of any of tie above alternates .ild be via n pe mit ;brongb Mr. H. •J. Semenock. Processing time is difficult to estimate hut. is unlik, ly to be less than two months. Please respond if we ea L be of any additional ass: tancc it this matter. Very truly yours, • J. D. P. E. District Administrator • L. HO1±Fs;AN, P. E. District Design Engineer' • • • • EiRI :cj • Attachment ce: II. J. Semenocl . • J. L. McIntosh K F-01 Bennett Fox, Inc. — f 41 • [ ,i' . •ti., 5I A I 1 Ol: I )1':I'Ak 1T,11IN I. ( )Ir 'I RANS1)01(1'A I UN ' . . • ' %, , ASl li NG It)•' (qh.. II+ .,ifl iri•..• : 1..1.:•1 (', .f.•1 .. (". ;.Fi ., l': , ❑. ',.,1":. • t--crlyv December 12, 1979 ( 9 ,i. Q.v-ti( • . Bennett and Fox, Inc: . 720 E. Main :,----- . , Puyal lGlashingtOn 98371 . . ' CS 1744 SR 405 Attn: Mrs. Debbie Maroon May Creek Interchange . • Drainage . ' Gentlemen: " This pertains to your recent discussions with our hydraulics staff regarding . . the operation of a culvert in the vicinity of May Creek Interchange on SR 405. . • The 24" concrete pipe was extended as Structure Note 56-73 under Contract • 7532. The original length was installed under Contract 4128 in 1952. . Apparently you have had discussions regarding its operations with the City of Renton and the occurence of a nearby ponding area is a factor• in the grading of your client' s parcel . The grading is apparently necessary for . the implementation of the highest and best land use. . The Department of Transportation takes the position that storm water. has been handled by this culvert with no reported damage or flooding of the road to date. For this reason, no •improvement of the drainage crossing is currently proposed. We recognize, as you know, that the storm water management is the . responsibility of the City. En. addition, legal remedies are occasionally . ' available For resolution of storm water routing issues. ' . • A copy of this. letter will be sent to toe City for their administrative information. We hope this letter will assist in your proposed development or re-evaluation of the land 'for tax purposes. We will continue to work with • you in an effort to improve the operation of the existing Facility. Please contact Bob Winter at 764-4163 if you feel that any additional hydraulic , • information would be helpful . • Very truly yours , . J.-L. ZIRKLE • ' District. Administrator. D. L. IIOFFMAN - District Design .Engineer ERW: se • cc: H. J. Scmenock J . R. Olson . J. L. McIntosh KF-01 T. t:J . � L • . n Cl1 C, C t- IVi- ,11 J d Hof" h • ;; t r . • i. !2 }�,--: _)�� 11I-- .:�T- r �� n l,\ Crates J C',J • P • N �� t!\ (J I--1 I—c .'4 '•=. 4'C> e. 1 • - CD Iv(' r L 1 �J l c I ( + -! (5 . . ' • • a, —j; S I •=P•O J c( J C-C_, 1 1 ;� f 1 -t 1 •._ 1,(..1, • • , ,• 4` • • • l(1) r�-1 I i _ •I, , 1 ) f ( ,. ( t . • I ' 1, E ,1 ^ `�' r r i ' 1\\ ,, 1 - • i� j - • k5 t=_ } I\I(IIJ ) II )1L cI. ( I , I, ,y : <f i ;'( : j a , c � '}; ;: N • - `1''- LU, . { d i f • • :, . // "„ ,—,- • • „ • • ; t '1 fl/1'•'.: .1'..':..• '.,.., ': (1,....,;: ••\.;1.. 1.: -'.," .-s.11,,,,..:.:AsS: :1-_.....,1)I!'I:1.1 Illill , ail �' . '..t;outh Point . . \; ..h t\ ��. . , �.J f • •``� — ' �� ,:n ` i f . I /.� • I - :..-•,..•• - :; . ,..,v ..: : . A f-iC1 C 1, 1 j I , • •• .� • P•Y I(_ • • �(/ (. '�/� f) / ' .,.J O V'r_..A C/ .,i '' ',� -i';''.' !fl L�l`i'1•l)�'.- , I .. .. . . ; . . \ . 1 . • . . C -:.-- 5L : . .• . , • .47 s--,.. . • . , . , o 8 - Lt I .• . , . • . ' 1 i -1 12 11 i..) (7...i. 1_,0 0 /',‘,1 • i\ •. ! . , . . • t . . ' t . •. ., . . . ,...7 - • . . ' 7i'S it 17...0 k. -a./C . . 1 . , '• .: /c/:/ 1") . . • V N.. . . -:,i.::'•- • . • . . • ‘. , '') I . . ' . . . '0 7—alici,, s-..;,4•x-:-.". ; . --4...' • N , N. ,, ' \ .. • 's •. •- . . • . . .-. ........... . . .,,,.: . ..... . - - . • •. .. . . -.. . ...-1.Z.,- . . . , ... . • .- • .... '') • - "..N.K.4 ', . . • . ''''.\\ c . , , \‘‘....,..,...„.....N>:/cg. . - \. . ,-,* NS' . • 0- ', - • • . ,- . ... . . . .. •. ..:.. ...._ Ix_ . ,...,, .... \. e . . , . , ---7--V/ . • . . 7 - -— ,'• - • --..'4• i . .., ..• 1, . • . . .4 . .:‘ • ' •• ' ., ),,N , - :, • -., ,1 • • ,; _,-/' '• ,7-4 .-!. . , N • -111,\ . • :i ) • 1 ,. _,) • r.1• • . . , A "2, • .. . _., .l . .2 (0 0/0 . !..., • • e`y:. ...., ,,...N_..!G•'.- \ -1•:,‘, ".r.t , .,..,„,,-4-6"i\-h•., L;' .7 •N'''' 1 . .(i. ,.; ''' . ., „-----ii,;k-..1°A • U, .4,,p9,3. •2,./c2)i,, .0,, .x.......7 , i f • • .......4- '' . . . / . . -..............., . 'al' _.,..-..;'-'..-"-. . ''''' • 41 / -1 • • , . -----.........-_ _ • ''.•‘-‘ / . / •:, 2 ‘ . . '\ 1 . '.. .-. • cN%\ . .. . . . •. . " /1 ,z,\. . .i. . . • •,.. .. 1 . . , .. . . . • it, \\,, .'S, • i , % !:.:., / v\. : , , \ , . . . . . .. . • (-4 . • 1 / . - • • . • ',-4 t 1 ?. :. CI.ik.") •. . .' -. . A • 1. . . . . . . . . . . • • \ st - • . . . i , . . . \ \ / . . • 1 . /. ' I . . . , . . . . / I . . . . . . . . , • , ., . . . . . . . . . . . . / . ., . . . . . . cilis •74,7 . 7ieo . i 4 . L7„ l X3 -• • \. . . . . . . . . 4 ,,.... , . • \\•... . . • Al.A(--•-•\... . • . . • • , .. ...•• ... .• '- . . . • • • 320 STATE EX REL. HELM v. KRAMER [May 1973 May 1973] STATE EX REL. STANDARD MIN. v. AUBURN 321 82 Wn.2d 307,510 P.2d 1110 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 responsibilities of legislators by the provision for an addi- the majority notes, the only authority in this country deal- tional legislative session and the continuation of standing ing with the issue of whether appropriations for salaries for legislative committees during the interim. state officers and employees are for the support of state [5] We can therefore conclude that it was in fact dis- government, holds affirmatively on that issue. State ex rel. criminatory to consider increases for state civil service em- Flanagan v. Taylor, 43 S.D. 264, 178 N.W. 985 (1920). There ployees consistently each year since 1965, and, with the is no case in our country where constitutional provisions exception of the judicial officials in 1972, with no increases ECEW rAl s wanliar to ours have been held to permit a referendum for state elected officials during that same period; that the . R ® WO hider the circumstances present in this case. adjustment of salaries across the board of all state electedCC'�`l 0(pM11 officials was long overdue, and that the legislature was vle-ik G ��195) P� tarrying out the legislative direction:of the state committee F EB on salaries act in implementing the purposes of that act ia ,11`�`�`2,3,4%516 1� [No. 42338. En Banc. May 31, support of state government by establishing and adjusting i19, 1973.] salaries on the basis of cost of living increases, the responsi- THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Standard bilities of their office, the increased responsibilities of their- ! Mining & Development Corporation, Respondent, v. THE office, and on the basis of being reasonably competitive CITY OF AUBURN et al., Appellants. with other comparable employment, in order to retain in [1] Zoning—Ordinances—Construction—In General. Although zoning an.d attract the best qualified persons to the respective state regulations are in derogation of the common law and should not be extended by implication beyond the scope and intent reflected by elective positions. We believe these matters of which we their language, they should be liberally construed to accomplish have taken judicial notice clearly show section 110 was their plain purpose and intent. enacted for the purpose of and was in support of state [2] Zoning—Ordinances—construction—"any District". An ordinance government and its existing public institutions, and does in utilizing the term "any district to indicate the broadness of a fact implement that purpose. • requirement must be construed, in the absence of expressed intent to the contrary, as applying to any district within the jurisdiction For the reasons heretofore stated, there can be no ques- whether classified for a specific use or not. tion as to whether section 110 comes within the second [3] Zoning—Special Use Permit—Standards—Issuance. The exercise of exception of article 2, section 1(b) as set forth in the sev- discretion by either issuing or denying a special use permit must enth amendment of our state constitution, and cannot be controlled by adequate standards regardless of whether the therefore be subject to referendum. deciding agency.is an administrative body or a legislative body acting in an administrative capacity. The relator's writ must be and is denied. [4] Zoning—Comprehensive Plan—Function. A comprehensive plan, HALE, C.J., FINLEY, ROSELLINI, HAMILTON, STAFFORD, once adopted, should throughout its existence guide the govern- , mental unit involved in its zoning regulations by serving as a WRIGHT, and BRACHTENBACH,JJ., concur. general blueprint suggesting various regulatory measures to be implemented by the actual zoning enactments. . UTTER, J. (concurring)—I concur on the ground stated by [See Ann. 168 A.L.R. 13, 37; 58 Am. Jur., Zoning (1st ed. § 200).] the majority that our constitution, as interpreted by our [5] Zoning—Special Use Permit-Standards—Conditions. Specific guid- earlier cases, states that a law providing for the support of ing standards for the establishment of conditions to be imposed on state government and its existing institutions is not subject special use permits are, owing to the considerable variation from to referendum. Our previous cases hold appropriations for case to case, not appropriate and, so long as due process and equal salary increases are properly part of the state budget. As protection rights are afforded to parties, not necessary. . 322 STATE EX REL. STANDARD MIN.v. AUBURN. [May 1973. May 1973] STATE EX REL.STANDARD MIN. v. AUBURN 323 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 [6] Zoning—Judicial Review—Abuse of Discretion—Burden of Proof. to certain conditions'to which the respondent objected and The burden of proving to the court that a discretionary act of a as a consequence brought this action. zoning agency was arbitrary and capricious rests upon the party so 1 During the course of the trial, the court noted a situation alleging• which had previously escaped the attention of counsel for Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King both parties. Upon the zoning map, the land used in this County, No. 743576, Lloyd Shorett, J., entered February 14, • gravel operation was not given a classification. Apparently 1972. Reversed and remanded. both parties to this action had always assumed that the Action to review a zoning decision. The respondents ap- land was zoned residential. While it is located in a sparsely peal from a judgment in favor of the petitioners. i • developed residential area, there are no dwellings immedi- John B. Bereiter, Bonjorni, Burgeson & Fiori, Duncan A. j ately adjacent to it. There is no question that it is within Bonjorni, and Stephen M. Sward,for appellants. i the city limits and is included on the zoning map as an unclassified district. Derrill T. Bastian,for respondent. The trial court concluded that, because the land was not ROSELLINI, J.—The respondent petitioned the superior given a zoning classification by the city, it was not subject to the provisions of the zoning ordinance governing the court for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the issuance of permits for gravel mining operations. It also Auburn Planning Commission and City Council in impos- held that the peiiiiit requirement was invalid because the ing conditions upon a permit which was issued to the re- ordinance itself did not specify standards to guide the Plan- spondent to conduct a gravel mining operation upon land ping Commission and the City Council in determining what within the city limits. It was alleged that the city acted conditions to impose. The court did not take evidence or arbitrarily and capriciously in imposing conditions which pass upon the respondent's allegations that the conditions were excessive and unreasonable. ! imposed were excessive and unreasonable. It was shown at the trial that in 1966 the City of Auburn On this appeal, the city challenges the court's two con- had annexed the property upon which the gravel extract- elusions upon which it based its judgment. In regard to the ing activity was to be conducted. The land had been zoned first of them, itadvances several contentions, only one of by the county as residential property. It is undisputed that which need be considered. This is the theory that the ordi- when the land was annexed it lost its county zoning classi- nance in question, viewed in the light of its purpose and fication. the statutory authority under which it was enacted and in The City of Auburn had adopted, in 1965, a general zon- conjunction with the comprehensive plan, shows that it was ing ordinance providing for comprehensive land use and the intent of the council, in enacting the zoning ordinance, division of the city into districts. to make the requirement of special permits for special uses Shortly after annexation, the respondent applied for and applicable.to all land within the city limits, regardless of obtained a permit from the city to conduct a gravel mining whether it was classified or unclassified. operation on the land, subject to certain conditions. This We look first to the statutory authority. RCW 35.631 pro- permit expired in 1971. In the meantime the City of Au- . vides vides a method of establishing a planning commission in'a burn had adopted a uniform building code and a compre- city or county, and for the adoption by ordinance or resolu- hensive plan-for the city's development. The respondent's 'sae also RCW 35A.63. The appellant in this case elected to proceed application for renewal of its permit was granted, subject under RCW 35.63. 324 STATE EX REL. STANDARD MIN. v. AUBURN [May 1973 May.1973] .STATE EX REL. STANDARD MIN.v. AUBURN 325 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 .. 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 tion of a comprehensive plan for land use within the RCW 35.63.120 .provides. for. a procedure_for amending boundaries of the municipality. RCW 35.63.080 authorizes any ordinance or resolution adopting,any such plan or reg- the legislative authority of the municipality to impose re- ulations. strictions upon the use of land i Pursuant to the authority conferred by this chapter, the in such measure as is deemed reasonably necessary or City of Auburn appointed the-Planning Commission and requisite in the interest of health, safety, morals and the s adopted a comprehensive plan, as well as a zoning ordi- general welfare, upon recommendation by its [planning] nance. A zoning map was filed. This map showed all of the commission . . . territory within the city divided into districts, but the prop- RCW 35.63.090 provides that: . erty of the respondent was not classified. The zoning ordi- -. . [a]11 regulations shall be worked out as parts of a . nance provided for the establishment of 15 classifications of comprehensive plan which each commission shall prepare districts, such as 1-family residential, light commercial, and for the physical and other generallyadvantageous devel- heavyindustrial. In each of these districts, the use of.the opment of the municipality and shll be designed, among land was restricted to that use which was designated in the other things,.to encourage the most appropriate use of classification. land throughout the municipality; to lessen traffic congestion and accidents; to secure safety from fire; to The respondent's land, being unclassified, presumably provide adequate light and air; to prevent overcrowding ': could be put to any use which was permitted in the classi- of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to fled districts. However, in none of the classified districts promote a coordinated development of the unbuilt areas; was a gravel pit authorized without the securing of a spe- to encourage the formation of neighborhood or commu- cial use permit. Section 28 of the zoning ordinance nity units; to secure an appropriate allotment of land area pro- in new developments for all the requirements of commu- i vided: . nity life; to conserve and restore natural beauty and The following uses may be permitted in the particular other natural resources; to facilitate the adequate provi- district listed below by a special permit issued by the sion of transportation, water, sewerage and other public City Council: uses and requirements. Any District. Gravel yards and pits may be permitted Provision is made in RCW 35.63.100 for the holding of by. a special permit issued by the City. Council after i recommendation and public hearing by the Planning public hearings before the recommendation of an initial Commission. plan to the municipality. It provides for the filing of a copy It is the respondent's theory, adopted by the trial court, of the ordinance or resolution adopting or embodying such plan or any part thereof or any amendment.thereto, as well that because the ordinance did not list unclassified districts, as any map or plat referred to or adopted by the ordinance . this provision did not apply to such.districts, even though .the legislative body used the rather all-inclusive words or resolution. "any district." Assuming for the moment that this theory is RCW 35.63.110 authorizes the council or board, on recom- valid and comports with the expressed intent of the ordi- mendation of its commission, to divide the municipality or nance, it does not necessarily follow, as the respondent and any portion thereof into districts or to establish such official x .the trial court have reasoned, that because.the provision maps, or development plans for the whole or any portion of does 'not apply to unclassified districts the respondent is the municipality as may be deemed best suited to carry out free to conduct a gravel extracting operation without the the purposes of the chapter, and to impose restrictions.and necessity of obtaining a permit. This provision-is the only regulations within such districts. . {. 326 STATE EX REL.STANDARD MIN. v. AUBURN [May 1973 May 1973] STATE EX REL.STANDARD MIN.v. AUBURN 327 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 one in the ordinance which authorizes the use of land for clear that it intended to allow the excavation of gravel only gravel pit purposes,' and if the respondent's theory is valid, under the conditions which should be imposed by the City it authorizes such use only in classified districts. It would Council in issuing a permit. Certainly there is no expressed follow that the respondent's land, being unclassified, is not intent that such activities might be carried on anywhere eligible for such a permit at all. within the city limits without such a permit. We are led to [1] We do not agree, however, with the interpretation conclude that when the drafters of this ordinance used the successfully put forth by the respondent in the trial court. words "any district," they meant any district within the It is the general rule, recognized and adopted by this court, city limits, whether classified or unclassified. Consequently, that zoning ordinances should be liberally construed to ac- - the respondent was subject to the requirement that it apply complish their plain purpose and intent. At the same time for and obtain a permit before conducting a gravel extract- the court bears in mind that they are in derogation of the ing operation upon its land. common-law right to use property so as to realize its high- It contends further, however, and the trial court upheld est utility and should not be extended by implication to this contention, that the requirement of a permit is invalid cases not clearly within the scope of the purpose and intent because the ordinance itself contains no standards to guide manifest in their language. Hauser v. Arness, 44 Wn.2d 358, the City Council in formulating the conditions which shall 267 P.2d 691 (1954). attach to a permit. [2] Reading the comprehensive plan and the zoning [3] We have recently recognized the principle that the regulations adopted in implementation of it, we find it legislative body of a municipality acts in an administrative manifest that the City of Auburn intended to regulate and capacity when it issues a special use permit and must be control the use of all land within the city limits. It also is guided by adequate standards. Durocher v. King County, 80 Wn.2d 139, 492 P.2d 547 (1972). As the general rule is =On page 31 of the ordinance (Ordinance No. 1702), there appears stated in 3 R. Anderson, American Law of Zoning § 14.10 the following provision: 3. Conditional Uses. In considering applications for Conditional (1968), the authority to issue special permits must be con- Uses, the Board shall consider the nature and condition of all trolled by adequate standards, whether it is vested in legis- Adjacent Uses and Structures, and no such Conditional Use shall be lative or administrative bodies.' These authorities are con- authorized by the Board unless the Board finds that the authorizing of such conditional use will not be materially detrimental to the cerned with the exercise of administrative discretion in public welfare or injurious to property in the Zone or vicinity in deciding whether to grant or deny a permit. pp, which the property is located and that the authorization of such 'See Zylka y ( yfn"`fr li Conditional Use will be consistent with the spirit and purpose of 1! a v. Crystal, 283 Minn. 192 167 N.W.2d 45 1969), S this title. In authorizing a Conditional Use, the Board may impose holding that if an ordinance governing the issuance of special use 4011' such requirements and conditions with respect to location, installa- permits does not specify standards to guide the administrative body in issuingy % or tion, construction, maintenance, and operation and extent of Opendenying such a permit, that body must make findings of fact l Spaces in addition to those expressly set forth in this title as may be showing the basis upon which it denies a permit; and that if it fails to deemed necessary for the protection of other properties in the zone do so, the usual presumption of reasonableness does not attach to its or decision, and the burden is upon the administrative body to show that Neitherrity and the public interest. the denial was not arbitrary or capricious. Arguments in favor of party to this action has claimed that this provision is imposing these requirements, the court said in a footnote on page 198, applicable to gravel pits under the Auburn ordinance. Arguably, it either by statute or by judicial decision include: might be the source of authority for such operations if the ordinance did not contain a special provision giving the Planning Commission the (1) To protect the applicant and the public from arbitrary action; duty of examining applications for this particular special use, conduct- (2) to prevent discrimination; and (3) to facilitate and confine the ing hearings and making recommendations thereon. scope of judicial review. See, 2 Rathkopf, Zoning and Planning (3 ed.) p.54-52;Note, 49 Minn. L.Rev. 973, 1000. 1 328 STATE EX REL. STANDARD MIN. v. AUBURN [May 1973 May 1973] STATE EX REL.STANDARD MIN.v. AUBURN 329 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 Since the respondent was not denied a permit, its corn- ing regulations of the municipality, or one which would plaint of lack of standards relates only to the imposing of require illegal conduct on the part of the permit holder. It conditions on the use. also is said that a condition may not be exacted which is We are cited to no authority holding that a zoning ordi- not in the public interest. nance must specify standards for imposing the conditions Thus it appears that the courts have developed certain under which a special use permit will be issued. Professor rules relating to the imposition of conditions, but none, Anderson says, in 3 R. Anderson, American Law of Zoning insofar as we have been able to determine, has said that the ordinance authorizing the issuance of permits must specify 15.29 (1968): standards for the imposition of conditions. As in the case of the power of a board of adjustment to In the case before us, the appellant citydeclares that it grant conditional variances, it is sometimes said that app board with authority to grant a special permit has inher- was guided by the considerations which are set forth in the ent power to attach conditions designed to carry out the comprehensive plan adopted by the city when it imposed purposes for which the permit requirement was imposed. conditions on the permit which it issued to the respondent, One court, upholding a board decision which conditioned and that it also took into consideration requirements which a special permit,said: are contained in its uniform buildingcode. "It is clear that a Zoning Board of Appeals has the inherent power, in connection with the granting of a The comprehensive plan, which was adopted by the city, special permit, to impose such reasonable conditions contains detailed statements of policy concerning the plac- and restrictions as are directly related to and inciden- ing of conditions upon the issuance of such permits. RCW tal to the proposed use of the property and which are 35.63.090 also sets forth a list of purposes which zoning not inconsistent with the provisions of the local ordi- regulations shall be designed to achieve. The zoning ordi- nance." nance contains, in its article 1 section 2 an express Under most zoning regulations, it is unnecessary top adop- rely upon inherent power to impose conditions, or to tion of these purposes. The terms of the permit which was infer such power from general language in the ordinance. issued to the respondent show that these guidelines were The authority to grant special permits commonly in- followed generally by the Planning Commission and City eludes express language empowering the board of adjust- Council in imposing conditions. It may be that some of the ment to grant permits subject to reasonable conditions conditions imposed were unnecessarilyburdensome, as the designed to protect adjacent property and to carry out the purposes of the ordinance. respondent contends. The trial court did not reach that question. (Footnotes omitted.) The trial court expressed doubt that the city building The author says, in section 15.30: code was relevant. We do not pass on this question, since at Assuming authority to attach conditions to a special the present stage of the proceeding the conditions are not permit, a condition is properly imposed where it does not before us for review; and if the appellant believes that a offend any provision of the ordinance, and where it ispp reasonably calculated to protect adjacent land and to particular condition is required or justified under the build- achieve some legitimate objective of the zoning ordi- ing code, it should have an opportunity to present that nance. theory on remand. In section 15.31, the rule is stated that a board of adjust- The respondent argues that the city is not required to ment may not impose a condition which is unrelated to the follow its comprehensive plan and consequently it cannot use of the land; or one which is inconsistent with the zon- be read in pari materia with the zoning ordinance to find • 330 STATE EX REL. STANDARD MIN. v. AUBURN (May 1973 May 1973) STATE EX REL. STANDARD MIN.v. AUBURN 331 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 82 Wn.2d 321,510 P.2d 647 standards. If we were convinced that specific standards the conditions imposed must necessarily differ from case to spelled out in the zoning law were necessary, this argument case. This does not mean that the applicant is denied due might well have substantial merit. But we have not been process of law or the equal protection of the laws—so long shown that courts have imposed such a stringent rule, nor as he is granted a hearing, a right of appeal, and a chance have we been shown that it would serve any substantial to show that the conditions are unreasonable, that is, un- purpose. If the purpose of the requirement of the special ! necessarily burdensome or unrelated to the purpose which permit is known, the court can examine the conditions they are legitimately designed to serve. imposed and after having heard the evidence, can deter- The guidelines set forth in the comprehensive plan reveal mine whether it is reasonably calculated to effect that pur- a purpose, in harmony with the general purpose of the plan pose and whether it is unnecessarily onerous. We know of and of zoning laws, to provide for the protection of neigh- no rule which would forbid the court to examine the corn- boring property and other areas affected by the operation prehensive plan, as well as the applicable statutes, to ascer- ( and to assure that the land will be left in such condition tain the purpose of the legislative body in providing that i that it can be used appropriately after the excavation is finished and will not become an "eyesore."' The considera- certain land may not be used in certain ways unless a tions set forth in the policystatement are proper and a special permit is secured. i P p p- [4] The respondent cites Buell v. Bremerton, 80 Wn.2d propriate, as we view the law, and the appellant has made 518, 495 P.2d 1358 (1972), suggesting that it forbids consid- 'The Sand and Gravel Industry. The Auburn Planning Area has eration of the comprehensive plan. We said there that a relatively extensive deposits of sand and gravel which are extracted comprehensive plan is not a regulatory measure, but is a and used as aggregate in concrete and asphalt. Good aggregate deposits which are reasonably accessible to metropolitan market areas are rela- "blueprint which suggests various regulatory measures." tively scarce. As the major ingredient of concrete, these deposits are This is in accord with RCW 35.63.080, which contemplates extremely useful and necessary and thus a valuable natural resource. that regulatory measures shall be adopted, as well as a This resource needs to be exploited in freeways, roads and public comprehensive plan. It is, however, the plain import of the works if dams and water projects and private construction are to continue their growth. statute, taken as a whole, that a city which adopts such a i "Sand and gravel quarries should be allowed to continue operation plan should be guided by it in its zoning regulations until it in the Auburn Planning Area as long as it is economically feasible is amended in the manner prescribed by statute or re- under regulations to protect the public health, safety and welfare. As a policy, it is recommended that quarries be permitted only where it is pealed. This was implicitly recognized in the Buell case, if advisable to modify slope to create usable land and where the commu- not explicitly so. The case is not authority for the proposi- nity will suffer no short or long-term adverse effects. Care must be tion that such a plan may not be consulted in making exercised to insure that creating usable land will be the real end result of the quarry operation and that it is not simply put,forth as an excuse administrative decisions. for a quarry permit. A final grading plan should be submitted with [5] As we recently indicated in Barry & Barry, Inc. v. every application, conditions of operation should be spelled out in Department of Motor Vehicles, 81 Wn.2d 155, 500 P.2d 540 detail and performance bonds required. These should be periodically (1972), the specification of standards is not always appro- I reviewed to insure that the operator is indeed progressing in the manner specified. Aesthetic qualities, erosion control, the effect on the priate in administrative actions. The function of prescribing community and the creation of usable land should be the primary the conditions under which a special use permit may be considerations in a decision to grant new quarry permits or extend the enjoyed is one to which this principle is applicable. Only scope of the five quarries presently operating. Amortization of equip- ment and market for the material should take second place as criteria." rarely will the environmental factors affecting different Comprehensive Plan for Auburn Planning Area (Sept. 1968), at 75. special use applications be the same. Generally speaking, { • IN RE ESTATE OF EGGERT [May 1973 May 1973] IN RE ESTATE OF EGGERT 332 333 82'Wn.2d 332,510 P.2d 645 82 Wn.2d 332,510 P.2d 645 no showing to the contrary. If the conditions imposed were the bonds by the federal government rather than a lower "open reasonably calculated to achieve the purposes set forth in market" price obtainable as of the date of the death of the bond's owner. the comprehensive plan and were not unnecessarily bur- [See Ann. 24 A.L.R. 1041, 57 A.L.R. 1158, 83 A.L.R. 939, 117 densome, the court should not set them aside. A.L.R. 143; 42 Am. Jur. 2d, Inheritance, Estate, and Gift Taxes §§ [6] The burden is upon the respondent to establish its 249, 264.] allegations concerning the allegedly arbitrary and capri- FINLEY,J.,did not participate in the disposition of this case. cious acts of the appellant in imposing conditions. See Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King Chestnut Hill Co. v. Snohomish, 76 Wn.2d 741, 458 P.2d 891 County, No. 203783, Solie M. Ringold, J., entered April 5, (1969). Since this issue was not reached in the trial of the 1972.Affirmed. action, it must be remanded for further proceedings con- sistent with the views expressed herein. If the trial court Probate proceedings. Appeal taken from a property val- orfinds that the respondent has established that any of the uation f tax purposes. • conditions imposed are unnecessarily onerous or not rea- George R. Mosier and Laurence A. Mosier, for appellant. sonably calculated to achieve the purposes set forth in the Slade Gorton, Attorney General, Timothy R. Malone, comprehensive plan, it should order the condition modified Senior Assistant, and Henry W. Wager, Assistant, for re- or removed. spondent. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. UTTER, J.—The executor of the estate of Myrtle T. Eggert HALE, C.J., FINLEY, HUNTER, HAMILTON, STAFFORD, appeals from a superior court judgment. The judgment WRIGHT,UTTER, and BRACHTENBACH, JJ., concur. fixed the value to the estate of certain United States Treas- ury bonds for state inheritance tax purposes at par value as contrasted with the quoted market price as of the date of death under the requirements of RCW 83.40.040.' [No. 42392. En Banc. May 31, 1973.] At the time of Myrtle T. Eggert's death, on July 31, 1970, In the Matter of the Estate of MYRTLE T. EGGERT, Deceased. the treasury bonds were inventoried and appraised for in- GEORGE R. MOSLER, as Executor, Appellant, V. THE STATE OF heritance tax purposes at $110,806 plus interest. This repre- WASHINGTON, Respondent. sented the quoted market price for such bonds on the open 11] Property—Market Value—Special Use—Effect. Market value means market as of the date of her death. Her executor later filed the amount of money which a purchaser who is willing but not federal estate tax returns listing the bonds at their par obligated to buy an item of property would pay an owner willing value of $170,000 plus interest to enable them to be used at but not obligated to sell such an item. If the item is peculiarly adapted to some particular use, such a characteristic must be 'RCW 83.40.040. "Valuation to be adjusted according to federal considered in fixing a fair market value for the item. appraisement. If after the values have been determined under this title 112] Taxation—Inheritance Tax—Market Value—U. S. Treasury Bonds. for inheritance tax purposes, the same estate is valued under the "Fair market value" as that term is used in RCW 83.16.010, the federal estate tax statute and the date of death value of the property, inheritance tax valuation statute, of U. S. Treasury bonds utilized or any portion thereof, fixed under the federal law, is increased above by an estate as credits against federal estate taxes at their par or decreased below the value theretofore fixed under the inheritance value plus interest is the par-value-plus-interest valuation given tax provisions of this title, and this valuation under the federal estate tax is accepted by the estate either by agreement or through final determination in the federal court, the value as fixed under the inherit- 1 f • 882, HYSTAD v. RHAY [Mar.1975 Mar.1975] GERLA v. TACOMA 883 12 Wn.App.872,533 P.2d 409 12 Wn.App.883,533 P.2d 416 granted a reasonable time within which to-challenge the [No. 1083-2. Division Two. March 11, I975.] extradition by means of a writ of habeas corpus. JOHN G. GERLA, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF TACOMA, Although the proceedings under the Extradition Act and Appellant. the Detainer Act are different, the differences are not so [I] Evidence—Absence of Objection—Effect. Evidence which is not fundamentally unfair as to deprive plaintiff of equal pro- objected to is properly before the trier of fact for consideration. tection and due process of law. The fact that a prisoner i [2] Administrative Late and Procedure—Judicial Review—Scope. Judi- may be sought under the Extradition Act as opposed to the , cial review of administrative actions taken under proper authoriza- tion is limited to determining whether or not such actions were Detainer Act, does not violate plaintiff's right to equal pro- conducted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, i.e., done in a tection of the laws. All prisoners are given notice, the sine willful and unreasoning fashion without consideration and in disre- gard of facts and circumstances. Belief by the reviewing court that qua non of due process, and reasonable access to the courts. a preponderance of the evidence is against the action is, standing Judgment of the trial court is affirmed. alone,immaterial. [3] Zoning—Special Use Permit—Standards--In General. The issuance GREEN and MUNSON, JJ., concur. j or denial of permits regarding special uses of land must be done in Petition for rehearing denied April 10, 1975. ; accordance with adequate standards. [4] Zoning—Special Use Permit—Conditions--Validity. Municipalities Review denied by Supreme Court May 20, 1975. possess inherent powers to impose reasonable conditions upon the issuance of special use permits, without reliance upon specific i standards,provided such conditions are not contrary to any provision of the zoning ordinance, do not require the recipient to engage in illegal conduct and are not unnecessarily burdensome to him, are in sthe public interest, and are reasonably intended to achieve some C� legitimate objective of the ordinance.A comprehensive development C ���` N i plan meeting this test may be utilized to guide.the imposition of R C' rcNcO :onditions upon special use permits. C,1 OF. E�(AMINER [5] Zoning—Special Use Permit—Conditions—Judicial Review. Judicial µtiP•RII4 �O review of the imposition of conditions upon the issuance of a Eg 2,619 pM special use permit is limited to determining if the exercise of �1�'rJ�cj administrative discretion was abusive. A'Mj�S�e3�10e11�12�'-`�� � [6] Zoning—Special 5 Uselst ed.)Permit—Conditions--Grant oning § 231.] of Property—Ya- lidity. Issuance of a special use permit dependent upon a dedication of realty to public purposes is valid when such a condition appears to be in furtherance of the purpose of the zoning plan or ordinance finance' ! and not unnecessarily burdensome. j [7] Administrative Law and Procedure—Arbitrary and Capricious— f Debatable Question. A conclusion reached by an agency which appears to be at least debatable is one upon which reasonable men Imight differ and is not arbitrary and capricious. [8] Zoning—Special Use Permit—Conditions—Grant of Property—Con- siderations. A condition that a property owner dedicate certain f realty to a public purpose in exchange for,a special use permit i i i 1 . ; 884 GERLA v. TACOMA [Mar.1975 Mar. 1975] GERLA v. TACOMA 12 Wn.App.883,533 P.2d 416 12 Wn.App.883,533 P.2d 416 885 may be made upon considering the relative benefit to such owner The facts giving rise to the controversymaybe s flowing from the permitted activity, the relative ability of the umma- rizpd as follows. Plaintiff owned a parcel of real property municipality or the owner to accomplish the public purpose, and on the southwest corner of East 72nd Street and Portland the cause for such purpose arising. [9] Zoning—Special Use Permit—Standards—Burdensome. Imposition Avenue in the city of Tacoma. He negotiated a lease with of a condition on a special use permit upon conflicting evidence as IVlobil Oil Corporation for the latter to erect and operate a to its burdensome effect upon the permittee, may not be denomi- gasoline service station. The trial court found that plaintiff noted as unnecessarily burdensome on review. was aware that before the City would allow construction of Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce a service station at that location it would probably require a dedication to the City of 6 feet of the property abutting County, No. 210429, James V. Ramsdell, J., entered April 23, 1973. Reversed. South 72nd for a length of 138 feet and another strip 12 feet in width for a length of 124 feet abutting on Portland Action to review a zoning decision. The defendant ap- Avenue. The required dedication would permit the widen- peals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. q ing of both major arterial streets to accommodate antici- Robert R. Hamilton, City Attorney, and William J. Bar- pated increases in the volume of traffic, would allow for the ker and F. H. Chapin, Jr., Assistants,for appellant. addition of right and left turn lanes at the intersection, and Alan Rasmussen,for respondent. ; • would also provide space for the construction of sidewalks and curbs. PEARSON, J.—The City of Tacoma appeals an adverse ! Plaintiff was aware of the probabilityof th judgment in a suit brought by plaintiff, John G. Gerla, ments since the Planning Commission, ese require- . ich he was claiming inverse condemnation arising out of an action by ? member; had imposed like conditions upon hot other servic ae the City's Planning Commission.' stations in other areas as well as upon other businesses in The primary issue raised on appeal is whether or not a the area involved. The preliminary lease with Mobil Oil condition attached to the issuance of a special use permit Corporation took into account the probability of this type granted to plaintiff's tenant, Mobil Oil Corporation, was a of condition. valid exercise of the City's police power. 1 The property involved was located within a C-2 (cola- P.ns�ver to the primary issue necessitates a consideration mercial zone) and consequently eligible under Tacoma's of the following questions: zoning ordinance for use as an automobile service station. (1) Did the City have statutory authority to impose the However, because of the hazardous nature of this. type of condition? business, another city ordinance (No. 18628) required a (2) Did the City's ordinance authorize imposition of the prospective applicant to obtain a special use permit and to . . condition? comply with detailed development standards. Section D(1) (3) From a factual standpoint, Was the condition reason- of Tacoma Ordinance No. 18628 is part of a provision set- ably necessary to accomplish the legislative purpose, or on ting standards for service station,development, and that the other hand, was it unreasonably burdensome to the t section itself provides for a minimum lot size for service stations "after dedication of all required street right of plaintiff under the circumstances? 'Plaintiff was at all times a member of the Planning Commission of Way." Mobil Oil Corpration's representative formally applied Tacoma, but took no official part"in the actions of that commission - which are at issue in this case. to the Planning Commission for the special use permit. :°s „T ' ' 886 GERLA v. TACOMA [Mar.1975 Mar.1975] GERLA v. TACOMA 887 3; 12 Wn.App..883,533 P.2d 416 12 Wn.App.883,533 P.2d 416 'i" Following a hearing in which testimony was taken, the in its oral decision. Obviously these observations were 3,' i' • commission determined to issue the permit on the condi- used by the court in concluding that the service station had ,= ,.'- tion, among several others not in controversy, that plaintiff not caused an "immediate danger of congestion." ' dedicate the two strips of property so that the two streets Ll� Had normal appellate. review been utilized, the I;icourt could properly consider onlyput 3=? could be,widened and sidewalks and curbs installed. p p Y the evidence before N =_ ; the Planning Commission. Such evidence could not have i:: At this point the plaintiff entered into an oral stipulation �r ' .: with the City which departed from the normal procedure of • included more than expectations of congestion, or the lack O.;.; appealing the condition to the City Council and from there thereof, generating from the new service station. While it i�; to the superior court. The City Attorney advises us that to seems unfair to the City to allow its administrative actions rt; accommodate plaintiff in. his desire to proceed with de- i to be reviewed by independent and "after the fact" evi- r',: velopment of the service station and.to accommodate a test dence, in the absence of an objection, we must assume that ;a ii this evidence was properly considered. 4,; ;i; case on the validity of the condition, plaintiff was allowed 7 ;+'y.i . to deed the properties to the City in compliance with the [2} The second departure from normal review procedure ,i`. condition attached to issuance of the permit, and still re- involves the scope of review, and poses a much more seri- ous ro • _.,.. serve his right to. collaterally attack the Planning Commis- problem. The trial court obviously made an indepen- "`` ' dent review of the factual issues and applied a "pre ponder- ,"�''� ' sion's action. In this regard, the trial court found that pp � "p' p der- , ' ► ance of the evidence" test in arriving at its decision, rather u:;: plaintiff complied with the condition while at the same g ,4 time "reservinghis right toquestion the authorityof the than an "arbitrary and capricious" standard normally re- ,''::; ` g quired in judicial review of administrative actions. It is e ; ! City to require the dedication of the said property. In the axiomatic that administrative actions, if properly author- if meantime, the deeds have been recorded, the streets wi- p p Y s'1, dened, the sidewalks installed, and the service station has ized under zoning ordinances, may be interfered with by s ' the courts only if they are conducted in an arbitraryand '`` '` been erected and is in operation. j 114•.' capricious manner. Evergreen State Builders, Inc. v. Pierce The "test case" then took the form of an inverse condem- County, 9 Wn. App. 973, 516 P.2d 775 (1973). Applying any A,. , nation action,' in which plaintiff sought compensation for } .• •: the two strips of land which he had dedicated to the City. ; other standard for review of the decision of the Planning _• '!{ ,j Commission would, we think, defeat the purpose of the : , The form of this action caused two departures from estab- action as stipulated by the parties, i.e., to test the validity _ . ;; lished procedures for judicial review of administrative ac- r. of the condition imposed in connection with the granting of tions. First, evidence was allowed and considered which , 'f. ' was clearly not before the Planning Commission. Plaintiff, - the permit. Accordingly, we believe that in order to reverse a'{-.. the Planning Commission's factual determination of the 4_'8 }' who had not been a witness before the Planning Com- =`'>' mission, testified at length concerning traffic conditions as need for the condition, the trial court would have to find ', -±'1 they existed both before and after the service station that the imposition of the condition, as applied to the evi- -%! dence before it, was willful and unreasoning, without con- :<�:. ' commenced operation. Also, the court made two visits to ...F_ : # sideration and in disregard of facts and circumstances. Ev- . ' ;; the scene and commented at length upon the traffic flow r �c,' 3 ergreen state Builders,Inc. v. Pierce County, supra. r r,� =A declaratory judgment action would have been more appropriate , It was noted in Evergreen that where there is room for :, for the purposes. The stipulation appears to have obligated the City to ' s. two opinions, action is not arbitrary or capricious when z:=; pay for the dedicated property in the event of an adverse ruling on the ` test case. exercised honestly and upon due consideration, even+ $ o GERLA V. TACQMA [Mar.1975 Mar.1975] GRLA v. TACOMA 889 12 Wn.App.883,533 P.2d 416 12 Wu.App.883,533 P.2d 416 though the court might believe that an erroneous conclu- [4] More importantly for our purposes, the Supreme sion was reached by the Planning Commission. Lillions v. 1 Court in State ex rel. Standard Mining & Dev. Corp. v. Gibbs, 47 Wn.2d 629, 289 P.2d 203 (1955); State ex rel. Auburn, supra, held that cities have inherent power to Cosmopolis Consol. School Dist. 99 v. Bruno, 59 Wn.2d 366,. s impose reasonable conditions and restrictions on the issu- 367 P.2d 995 (1962). i ance of special use permits, even though the imposition of For these reasons, if the Planning Commission's factual such conditions is not guided by specific standards. 3 R. determination was not "arbitrary and capricious" when ap- Anderson, American Law of Zoning 15.29 (1968). To be plied to the facts, the trial court was in error in its conclu- I valid, such conditions must. (1) not offend any provision of sion, even though the result might be proper by application the zoning ordinance, (2) not require illegal conduct on the of a "preponderance of the evidence" test. See Shaming- 1 part of the permittee, (3) be in the public interest, (4) be house v. Bellingham, 4 Wn. App. 198, 480 P.2d 233 (1971). i reasonably calculated to achieve some legitimate objective The trial court's ruling against the City was based i of the zoning ordinance, and (5) not he unnecessarily bur- largely upon three grounds, two legal and one factual: (1) I densome or onerous to the landowner. State ex rel. Stan- that the City acted "without authority in law" in imposing , dard Mining.&Dev. Corp.v.Auburn'supra. the condition upon grant of the permit; (2) that the Ta- Furthermore, the court held in Standard that the City coma City Code, Sec. 13.06.37"0, did not expressly authorize ; may rely upon its comprehensive plan of development as the dedication of such property; and (3) since the City guidance for the imposition of reasonable conditions on the failed to establish that the service station would pose an i granting of special permits. "immediate danger" of traffic congestion, the condition im- posed was "without basis in fact." [5] The function of the reviewing court in considering the validity of such conditions was discussed in State ex [3] For the reasons stated below, in our view these 1 rel. Standard Mining &Dev. Corp. v. Auburn, supra at 332: rulings were in error. We first consider the general author- ity of the City to impose the type of condition involved. We If the conditions imposed were reasonably calculated to note that the trial court was without the benefit of State ex achieve the purposes set forth in the comprehensive plan rel. Standard Mining & Dev. Corp, v. Auburn, 82 Wn.2d and were not unnecessarily burdensome, the court should 321, 510 P.2d 647 (1973).3 That case discusses the general not set them aside. statutes through which cities are allowed to regulate and See Chestnut Hill Co, v. Snohomish, 76 Wn.2d 741, 458 P.2d impose restrictions upon the use of land. It would be un- i 891 (1969). necessarily repetitious to review the Supreme Court's care- . 1 [6] Before analyzing Tacoma's ordinance in light of the. ful analysis of the statutory power of cities to delegate to t above test, we must consider the nature of the condition at planning commissions the authority to require permits for ? issue, since it required a contribution of portions of plain- special uses of land. The principal requirement for the issu- tiff's property, i.e., a dedication of land. The principle that a ance of such permits is that they be guided by adequate property owner may be compelled to contribute financially standards. Durocher v. King County, 80 Wn.2d 139, 492 fi t.o street or other improvements as a prerequisite to obtain- P.2d 547 (1972). . ing some beneficial use of his property is not new to the 'The opinion in State ex rel. Standard Mining ez Dev. Corp. v. law of zoning. It is recognized by RCW 35.44.020, as it Auburn, 82 Wn.2d 321, 510 P.2d 647 (1973), was filed May 31. 1973, pertains to local improverrient assessments, and it is recog- after the case at bench was tried. i. nized by case law with respect,to concomitant agreements. I ' i GERLA v. TACOMA [Mar.1975 Mar.1975]- GERLA v. TACOMA 891 89a. 12 Wn.App. 883,533 P.2d 416 • 12 Wn.App.883,533 P.2d 416 the police power. The business of storing and handling State ex rel. Myhre v. Spokane, 70 Wn.2d 207, 422 P.2d 790 gasoline at automobile service stations within a devel- (l967) oped area is attended with a peculiar degree of danger to In State ex rel. Myhre v. Spokane, the Supreme Court f life and property, due to its flammable and explosive stated at page 216: propensities. It is further found that noxious odors, noise, Widening streets and installing electrical controls for i and traffic hazards emanating from the conduct of such a the safety of both pedestrians and vehicular traffic are business are such to make the regulation of its location regulatory measures which are within the proper exer- necessary and reasonable to promote the public health, cise of the city's police power. When the city requires safety, and general welfare. that the cost of such safety measures be borne by The first development standard in Subsection D(1) im- the company, it is not bargaining away its regulatory policeplicitlyrecognizes the possibilitythat dedication of prop- borne power but, rather, determining that the cost should be ertymaybe required to assure that thegeneral purpose of by the persons who created the necessity for the ( q p p expenditure of such funds, instead of by the city gener- the ordinance is fulfilled: ally. The service station site shall have a minimum width of See a discussion of this principle in the dissenting opinion 120 feet and a minimum area of 15,000 square feet after of all required street right of way. of Justice Marshall Neill in Chrobuck v. Snohomish � (Italics ours.) County, 78 Wn.2d 858,480 P.2d 489 (1971). In passing upon application for permits to operate service We see no reason to differentiate this case from the anal-ogous situations concerning concomitant agreements, so stations, Subsection E of the ordinance directs the Planning long as requirements discussed in State ex rel. Standard Commission to be guided by the following criteria: Mining & Dev. Corp. v. Auburn, supra are fulfilled. Here, it 1. The proximity of other service stations or other was the application for the special use permit that, at least businesses 41storing or handling flammable liquids or in the view of the City, created the necessity for the widermaterials;. The roximit to residences, schools, hospitals, streets, pedestrian walkways, and so forth. If that view is churches, theaters Y parks, and other places of public factually supported, then plaintiff, rather than the City, assembly;(53 should bear the costs of such improvements as in State ex t 3. Any adverse effect that the proposed use would rel.Myhre v. Spokane, supra. - have on traffic on the abutting streets and highways, We turn next to the City's ordinance and the Planning including, but not limited ito,conga stion, turning move- Commission's ruling to determine whether the aforemen- inc dangers pedestrians." ours.) tinned requirements of State ex rel. Standard Mining & (ItalicsIt is clear to us that the above ordinance satisfied the Dev. Corp.v.Auburn,supra,were met. Tacoma City Ordinance No. 18628 includes Sec. 13.06.376, 'There were two other service stations on the intersection in ques- tion. which containsand operatione ed eofl automobile standards stations. °To the south of plaintiff's service station was a large K-Mart con- struction shopping center with a heavy volume of automobile and pedestrian Subsection A of 13.06.376 provides: traffic. Across the street from the potential service station site was a It is found and declared that the location and operation bank. of automobile service stations in the City of Tacoma are necessary to our modern way of life, but the public inter- Two major arterial streets formed the intersection of East 72nd Street and Portland Avenue. est requires that they shall be subject to regulation under I 1 } • i GERLA v. TACOMA [Mar.1975 Mar.1975] GRRLA v. -TACOMA 892 ; 893 12 Wn.App. 883,533 P.2d 416 12 Wn.App. 883,533 P.2d 416 • requirements of State ex rel. Standard Mining & Dev. _ connection with other commercial development on both Corp. v. Auburn, supra, for the f obeaw widened, to these experts, require that the two strips of land be dedicated, provided that that both arterials , particularly at the intersec- when applied to the facts, the condition was not unneces- tions where turning movements must be accommodated. sarily burdensome and was reasonably calculated to alle- Both streets are major arterials, one feeding into Interstate viate any adverse effects which the new service station 5 to the west and the other serving Interstate 5 to the might have on any of the three criteria set forth above. south. The zoning ordinance involved is not only compatible [7] With the safety factors and traffic control problems with the type of condition imposed, it appears to be specifi- (right and left turn lanes) and the potential future conges- cally contemplated to promote one of the stated purposes of tion, the City's action in requiring the permit was at the the ordinance, i.e., safety. Furthermore, the criteria, in our very least debatable—and clearly not arbitrary and capri- view, afford sufficient standards for the granting or denial cious. of the permit in question. [8] The City's witnesses also testified that under the For these reasons it was error for the trial court to con- projected overall plan for arterial development there would elude that the City acted without authority of law in im- be insufficient funds for several years, because of other posing the condition in the grant of the permit. We con- higher priority problems, to condemn property sufficient to widen the streets. The trial court also stated this fact was elude that the condition was within the City's police power and was authorized by both state law and by its own ordi- not material to the issue. But this is inconsistent with the view expressed in State ex rel. Standard Mining & Dev. nance. , comprehensiveplanmay We now turn to the question of whether or not imposi- Corp.p. Auburn, supra, that the tion of the condition was arbitrary and capricious. In re- be considered in determining the reasonableness of the con- viewing the findings of the trial court as explained by its dition. It seems to us that whether a condition which oral decision, it is obvious that the court considered only requires a landowner to bear part of the cost of a necessary one facet of the testimony, i.e., the plaintiff's testimony that street improvement is reasonable depends, in part at least, in fact less traffic was generated by the service station than upon the City's ability to provide the improvements in by the preexisting businesses which had previously oper- some other way, particularly where the property owner's projected use of the property creates in a substantial way The court expressly rejected the detailed testimony of the aced on the property. necessity for the improvements.the City's witnesses as it pertained to pedestrian safety, as [9] Likewise, we are not persuaded that the condition well as to the question of traffic control. The City's chief as proposed was unnecessarily burdensome. One expert, engineer and the City traffic engineer specifically testified called by the City, testified that in his opinion the addi- that the strips of land were needed to provide ample space tional benefits to plaintiff's land from the improvements for sidewalks and curbs so that pedestrians would be di- offset any loss in value caused by the decreased size of the rected away from the traffic lanes when they crossed the property. While this testimony was disputed by plaintiff's own opinion as to his loss, it was not disputed that an two wide entrances and exit driveways required on each street side of the service station. Furthermore, even though automobile service station was the highest and best use for - - the immediate impact may not have resulted in increased _ the property. Furthermore, no representatives of Mobil Oil congestion, the long-range impact of this service station in Corporation testified that the smaller size of the lot was. 894 INTERNATIONAL SALES v. SEVEN BAR [Mar.1975 Mar.1975] INTERNATIONAL SALES v. SEVEN BAR 895 12 Wn.App.894,533 P.2d 445 12 Wn.App.894,533 P.2d 445 unduly restrictive upon their operations. At the very least, for the collection of a check issued by the respondent in the the decision was debatable and made upon conflicting evi- sum of $3,024, on which the latter stopped payment. The dence. As such, it is not subject to judicial interference. respondent, by special appearance, moved -to quash the Sharninghouse v. Bellingham, 4 Wn. App. 198, 480 P.2d 233 summons and dismiss the action on the grounds that the (1971). court lacked jurisdiction under the long-arm statute, RCW Reversed and remanded with directions to dismiss the 1 4.28.185. The court granted the motion and entered an order of dismissal. This appeal is from that order. action. The facts are as follows. The respondent (Seven Bar) is i a New Mexico corporation with its principal place of busi- ARMSTRONG, C.J., and PETRIE, J., concur. - . Petition for rehearing denied April 24, 1975. ness in Albuquerque, and the appellant (International Review denied by Supreme Court June 24, 1975. Sales) is a Washington corporation with its principal place of business in Tacoma. Seven Bar contracted in New Mex- [No. 1284-2. Division Two. March 11,1975.] icO to buy an aircraft from one Jack Mills, then a resident Appellant, v. SEVEN of New Mexico. The aircraft was in the possession of Tide INTERNATIONAL SALES AND LEASE, INC.,BAR FLYING SERVICE,INC., Respondent. Air, Inc., a Washington corporation, and the respondent D.] Courts—Surisdiction—Nonresidents—Long'-arm Statute—Due Pro- cess. ? agreed to take delivery at Tacoma Industrial Airport. As Due process concepts, as applied to the long-arm statute (RCW part of the consideration for the purchase, the respondent 4.28.185), do not require that the act or transaction in this state out I agreed to pay Tide Air for the repairs which the latter had of which the action has arisen be either extensive or physical. It is imade to the aircraft. Mills represented to the respondent only necessary that there be substance to the contact within this state, and that the impact within the state of the nonresident's that the amount owing for repairs was approximately activity is foreseeable. ? $1,200. Seven Bar sent its pilot, armed with a blank check, [2] Courts—Jurisdiction—Forum Non Conveniens. In exercising its dis- to Tacoma to pick up the aircraft. On his arrival, the pilot cretionary power to dismiss an action in favor of foreign jurisdic- was told by Tide Air that the amount owed by Mills was tion, a court may impose conditions upon a dismissal in order to ; $3,024. The pilot unsuccessfully attempted to locate the insure fair treatment to all parties. [See Ann. 32 A.L.R. 6, s. 48 A.L.R.2d 800; 20 Am. Jur. 2d, Courts president of Seven Bar Flying Service, Inc. Believing that § _175.] he should return to New Mexico as soon as possible, the Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce i pilot completed the check for the amount of $3,024, .re- County, No. 221067, Stanley W. Worswick, J., entered De- ceived the plane from Tide Air, and flew it back to New Mexico. When Seven Bar learned of these events, it cember 6, 1973. Reversed. stopped payment Action to collect a check. The plaintiff appeals from a pp A yment o the check. It contends that the addi- tional amount claimed by Tide Air represents debts owed judgment of dismissal. x •by Mills which are unrelated to the repair of the aircraft. James J. Mason,for appellant. This contention is somewhat confirmed by the record and Richard J.Dolack (of Comfort,Dolack,Hansler,Holscher, 3 . the admissions during argument. It is not disputed that at the time Seven Bar took possession of the aircraft, Jack Rosenow & Burrows), for respondent. o Mills had clear title to it and there were no liens of record JOHNSON, J.*—This action was brought by the appellant 1 *Judge Bertil E. Johnson is serving as a judge pro tempore of f the Court of Appeals pursuant to Laws of 1973,ch. 114. i tt MEMORANDUM TO Hearing Examiner • DATE 2/26/80 FROM Planning Department SUBJECT SEA-BELLE * Mrs. Clifford Hoof, 7240 Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. , Renton, Washington 98055, 255-8358, called at 8:55 a.m. , this date, to indicate that she is in opposition to the Sea-Belle proposal , as stated in the previous public hearing. She also requested that all previous testimony entered by Mrs. Hoof at previous public hearings regarding this matter be considered by the Hearing Examiner. Further information will be submitted in writing by February 29, 1980. *Correction: Ms. Trina Hoof, 11030 S.E. 76th Street, Renton, WA 98055, 255-7038 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER FEB 261980 AM PM " ,819,IU,llvf21112i3e415,6, • EXHIBIT NO. 7 ITEM NO. 5,- 170 2 - 79 t SP-402-79 Page Two Mr. Butrim advised that the property is currently unusable and future development, although unknown at this tine, on the commercially zoned property will comply with the zoning designation for either commercial or multifamily residential use and will occur concurrently with development of property owned by the applicant east of the site. The Examiner referenced Section.M.2 of Exhibit #1 which recommends.approval subject to reduction of development intensity in the northerly one-third of the site and provision of heavy landscepe3 buffering along the northerly and northeasterly property lines, and inquired if the applicant concurs in the Planning Department recommendation. Mr. Butrim indicated agreement with the conditions. The Examiner inquired regarding proposed methods of controlling development intensity on the northerly one-third of the site. David Clemens, • Senior Planner, advised that the method would dePend.upon the proposed use, i.e., reduction of number of dwelling units for residential use and less intensive activity, reduced- building coverage and increased landscaping for commercial use. The Examiner noted recommendations submitted by the Police Department, and asked the • • applicant if he concurs with the conditions. Mr. Bennett advised that Sea-Belle Properties will administer the fill operation and ensure-that roads, are kept free of construction debris, traffic patterns will remain uninterrupted, flagmen are provided and proper notification of the project is accomplished. The Examiner requested further comments in support of the application. There was no response. He then requested comments in opposition to the request. Responding was: Mrs. Clifford Hoof 7240 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Hoof, resident in Tract 168 located north of the site, reported that the proposed project will destroy an existing wildlife habitat on the property which has inhabited water fowl as well as deer, in the wooded areas. The Examiner reviewed the environmental checklist provided by the applicant, and inquired if the applicant had addressed potential effects on existing fauna utilizing the property. Mr. Bennett advised his finding that the property is mostly cleared of large. standing trees except in the southern portion, and 'unigting vegetation consists of reeds, cattails and grasses. He indicated that he was not aware that larger mammals have inhabited• the area, but observations of existence of rabbits and mice have occurred. .He reported that existing water fowl.would likely seek refuge on Lake Washington to the west when the site is developed. The Examiner•noted concern that approval of a fill and grade permit on the site without appropriate'proposed development plans may allow the property to remain undeveloped for years. and unnecessarily eliminate an existing wildlife habitat. 'Mr. Butrim stated that • economic conditions would determine the length of time prior to_commencement of development, but because the site is currently served by Water and sewer utilities, and other development activity in the area consisting of construction of a 140-unit condominium is occurring, • development would probably begin within two years. He advised the necessity of acquiring th0 fill and grade permit at this time to enable preparation of the site for such development. ' • The Examiner requested.further comments in,opposition to the request: There was no.response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department staff. Mr. Clemens indicated that because the declaration of non-significance had been issued by the Planning Department • prior' to receipt of Exhibit #4 and awareness of storm drainage problems, and because Mrs. Hoof had raised concerns regarding wildlife not reviewed by. the, applicant' or the . . department, the validity of the declaration should be further reviewed, and he requested a continuance of the public hearing for a one week period. The Examiner asked .if parties in attendance would object to continuation of the matter until September 18, 1979. There was no objection. The Examiner requested further comments. 'Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No: SP-402-79 was closed at 10:03 a.m. and continued to September 18, 1979. • CONTINUANCE: • The hearing was opened on September lb, 1979 at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. . Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, requested that the review period for evaluation of environmental significance be extended to October 9, 1979. The Examiner granted the request to continue the hearing to 9:00 a.m. on October 9, 1979, and the hearing was subsequently closed at 9:10 a.m. . V OF R4 ,ro THE CITY OF RENTON CJ `0 Q Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9,0 co- 235- 2550 0,94 fD sEPS -1-O February 8 , 1980 Sea-Belle Properties 5542 Lake Washington Blvd. Kirkland , WA 98033 Re : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE , File SP-403-79 ; property located immediately east of Lake Washington Blvd . between S .E . 76th St . and S .E . 80th St . Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on February 7, 1980 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for February 26, 1980 at 9 : 00 a .m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director Roger J . B1 ylock Associate Planner cc : Robert A . Bennett Bennett & Fox, Inc . 720 E. Main Puyallup , WA 98371 OF R o THE CITY OF RENTON U t$ Q,: Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 � r. NAL ? BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR is PLANNING DEPARTMENT 99 co, 235- 2550 o9�TFC SECA- February 8, 1980 Robert A. Bennett Bennett & Fox, Inc. 720 E. Main Puyallup, WA 98371 RE: SEA-BELLE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION, SP-403-79 Dear Mr. Bennett: Following our meeting during the last week of January, I relayed the information to the Planning Director; and he was unwilling for us to schedule a public hearing without having a report from the Engineering Division . We received that report yesterday , February 7th, and have scheduled a public hearing for Tuesday, February 26th. Please find attached the normal acceptance letter that we have concerning the application. If you wish to discuss the particular requirements that the Engineering Division has placed on the proposal , please talk directly with Mr. Monaghan. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director ! (V124 eck Roger J. Blayloc Associate Planner RJB:wr Enclosure 1 , ' 1 ', ' 1 i. a '"" ,0411': '' \17415:',01 Ver;:3 ,if": '......% n,..... ' egki;A,1,=1,1,r,0 I li 1,1 1:':' ,f1' i'.!.e' ' `"'4: ' .° x.,,— ::,, ...,., '--- ' itt .." —':.....l, .,,,,., ' .1;•,. i 1)P 1 , -. -: , '7ii., ,..* : , A: e ' . ,A.,,,, ,v,..,:..p.m . . . ..... ft.t.. , --Nik-• k \4, , . ! i,•, , 4-`,..ti-•4,..;',, 'o hi',1I; .'C-.!,....'a-.''?.'%., T : ; • ' P A Eii4 4,..4'''.t'. ',i'•, 3rt'%.e..'4,'''s.;0,4;.0.:t,s •4..,,,,ir -,,2.%t„.,,.'.'.'-'-,--;h t,V A„1 ,,,.., f,;„ ',k. ,'_,` 6 ''',• '..'-': 1,I GENERAL LOCATION° AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD . N .E . ,, BETWEEN S .E . 76TH ST . AND S .E . 80TH ST . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: it} LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT . ,: , I . I { I 1, 131' POSTED TO NOTIFY , POPERTY OWNERS OF , 4,0, '''' 7 , ' , -4.4- I. .,.. JIL 0, 4,,.. ...hi. ''.-- '-• - titai , , FVF. , „t, /' , , , ' 4%1 ' •ttsn ,;'; 0 . -.* ..'"‘ .,:', ''• 1, :a--,, .> A..' f'` , TO BE HELD ' , 1, IN CITY CIUNC1L CHAMBERS, VIUNICIP 04,1 BUILDING ;, FEBRUARY ON Z61.. 1980 9 : 00 A .M.BEGINNING AT PIM. ........_ — --' • .121,7 r:RN1 G ITEM ,, ,, ,,,,,. , t ,,,,,,, 1. ,7f., , .., .,..,..,‘, .E , , 4,•,,,... •,,, :,,, -° t ''.4'. - - • . .. ' , . ,.••\44;," ':',,k;',' t„..., '' , et41 i , - ;" TO FILL AND GRADE 'IN , . , . . V B-1 Z 0 N E il 1 1; t. • 11 • It' I H , 1 , L ,. I : i . 1, •,. , :' 1 a i.): 7,* 0 ,, , . ! , , , 1, , , ' ,1 •. P • '1, ..' k t . ' ' ',.,.. ,,,• .1 ft.^', ." ,.. ? «,, r ,Y. 1,, ti: ." V. '` '. 1 , i; ) , • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 IRS NOTICE NOT TO BE NikliirVED ViITHOUT PnOPER AU1T-(110,7:4,74.FATOCPX NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON FEBRUARY 26 , 1980, AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . MRS . ARTHUR BEALE , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1 AND R-3, file R-002-80 ; a 3 3/4 acre site on the northeast corner of Union Avenue N .E . and N .E . Sunset Boule- vard - the northern 100 feet to R-3 and the southern 300 feet to B-1 . 2 . SWANSON-DEAN CORPORATION (CANYON OAKS) , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A 31-LOT SUBDIVISION OF A TOWNHOUSE P .U .D. , file PP-453-79 ; property located along the east side of Kennewick Place N .E . between N .E . 30th and the old Pacific Coast Railroad right-of-way . 3 . SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE , File SP-402-79 ; property located immediately east of Lake Washington Blvd . N .E . between S .E . 76th St . and S .E . 80th St . Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 26 , 1980, AT 9 :00 A .M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED : February 13 , 1980 GORDON Y . ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , ROGER J . BLAYLOCK , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County , on the 7th day of February , 1980. SIGNED([ 1pACI :j3L516-t . 27z - OF I A, 45 ° =� >. .. O PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT U �® � - '� ENGINEERING DIVISION ® 235-2631 n MUNICIPAL BUILDING - 200 MILLAVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 09 A Q, 09gT�D SEPR °O� CHARLES J. DELAURENTI January 18, 1980 MAYOR Ms. Debbie L. Maroon Bennett l; Fox, Inc. P.O. Box 1031 Puyallup WA 98371 Subject : Sea-Belle Properties Fill Permit Dear Debbie: Reference is made to your letter dated January 15, 1980, requesting directions from the Engineering Department as to its requirements for obtaining a fill permit for the referenced site. It is generally agreed that the existing 24" culvert crossing 1-405 adjacent to the site is inadequate to handle the contributing runoff. We have had numerous discussions with your office to determine ways to relieve this situation. One method we suggested was to divert the flow from the area South of N.E. 44th St . westerly to an existing 18" culvert across I-405. • In a field meeting December 12, 1979, with Bob Winter of W.D.O.T. and representatives of the Engineering Department, it was agreed that this route was the most feasible. This would involve installing a culvert across Jones Ave. N.E. at N.E. 44th Street and open ditching to the existing 18" culvert and connecting the west end of the 18" culvert to the existing 24" storm drain west of [-405. W.D.O.T. has agreed to cooperate in obtaining permits to accomplish this work. It is the Citys' position that the Developer is required to install these offsite improvements prior to filling more than 50% of the property. Before the site can be filled beyond 50% the following is requested: 1 . Plan and profile of the offsite drainage along with a copy of all permits required per the attached map. • 2. Analysis of the existing 24" culverts crossing the frontage road and I-405 (e.q. effect of headwater on subgrade and roadway elevations) . 3. Interim drainage and erosion/sedimentation control plan. . Ms. Debbie L. Maroon January 18, 1980 Page 2 4. Drainage plan showing how up stream runoff will be collected and directed to existing culvert. Including calculation substantiating the sizing of the ditch. If you would propose to design the retention/detention system for the site, you should use a 25 year storm and ground conditions as they exist • prior to filling. Storage will not be allowed in the main collection ditches as outlined in Item 4 above. Should you have any further questions, please call me at 235-2631. Very truly yours, Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Office Engineer DGM:ckd • • • • • • • 4 I " enema SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1031 • PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON 9837I PUY: 845-8833 SEA: 838-3474 January 15, 1980 Don Monaghan Engineering Department City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Don, Would you please provide me with some feedback on my engineering plans for the Seabelle properties fill permit? I would like to complete the project as soon as possible and I am unable to do so until I know what is necessary to satisfy your office. Sincerely, . . Debbie L. Maroon Bennett & Fox, Inc. • c.c. Roger Blaylock Paul Butrum • • •• 4,0,slArf �- STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION '� WASHINGTON t- '' _' Office of District Engineer,D-1,6431 Corson Ave.So.,C-81410,Seattle,Washington 98108 '!- #:'- Dixy Lee Ray Governor January 7, 1980 City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 CS 1744 SR 405 Attention: D. G. Monaghan May Creek Interchange Drainage Gentlemen: This will transmit the attached letter pertaining to a culvert in the May Creek Interchange vicinity on SR 405. Another purpose is to confirm on-site discussions with Mr. Winter of our staff on December 12, 1979. . It was then, with Messrs. Monaghan, Bray and Phillips, that the 18" culvert at SR 405 Station 454+54 and the 24" culvert at Station -0+00 were observed operating at less than capacity while the 24" culvert at Station 10+50 was serving more than its natural tributary area. Several schemes were discussed which could reroute water more to its original course and mitigate the symptoms being experienced upstream of the culvert at Station 10+50. The alternatives, as discussed during the field visit, involved a connection from the Jones Avenue ditch to one of the culverts at Stations 454+54 or 0+00. The general schemes are displayed on the attachment: A alternate will make use of the 24 inch culvert at Station 0+00. Open cutting of ramps cannot be considered, however a proposal to bore under pavement could be entertained. ______._______ _ _____.. _��_._ _..._. _ i� B alternate will route Jones Avenue water to the 18 inch culvert at Station 454+54. Secondary construction will then be required at the outlet. This could I be additional connection C to structure note 19 or improvement of 8 inch pipe_ D. _, _ _ _____......__--. . Alternates A and B simply address water in the Jones Avenue ditch. Investigation for this letter indicated that a goal to route water from point E to alternates A or B would serve the area in a manner more similar to the pre-SR 405 condition. The pre-SR 405 condition appears to be indicated on the 1950 USGS quadrangle maps. Old mapping and aerial photographic data is being investigated to confirm the accuracy of this quadrangle sheet. 4 3 J City of Renton January 7, 1980 Page Two - _ _ Implementation of any of the above alternates would be via a permit through Mr. H. J. Semenock. Processing time is difficult to estimate but is unlikely to be less than two months. Please respond if we can be of any additional assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, J. D. ZIRKLE, P. E. District Administrator D. L. HOFFMAN, P. E. District Design Engineer • ERW:ej Attachment cc: H. J. Semenock J. L. McIntosh KF-01 Bennett Fox, Inc. rtr OF SIA IE. DEPARTMENT I OF 1 RANSPOf�I A l ION WASHINGTON Olrirr ur District Enginr. D I.64{I Ow,un Avr Sn C Si.III,`r attic.Wasntngtun ?81UR I)ixy I(r H.y Guvrt nnr December 12, 1979 C I o- Bennett and Fox, Inca 720 E. Main Puyal y , Washington 98371 CS 1744 SR 405 Attn: Mrs. Debbie Maroon May Creek Interchange Drainage I I' Gentlemen: This pertains to your recent discussions with our hydraulics staff regarding the operation of a culvert in the vicinity of May Creek Interchange on SR 405. The 24" concrete pipe was extended as Structure Note 56-73 under Contract 7:532. The original length was installed under Contract 4128 in 1952, Apparently you have had discussions regarding its operations with the City of Renton and the occurence of a nearby ponding area is a factor in the grading of your client' s parcel . The grading is apparently necessary for the implementation of the highest and best land use. The Department of Transportation takes the position that storm water has been handled by this culvert with no reported damage or flooding of the road to date. For this reason, no improvement of the drainage crossing is currently proposed. We recognize, as you know, that the storm water management is the responsibility of the City. In addition, legal remedies are occasionally available for resolution of storm water routing issues. A copy of this letter will be sent to the City for their administrative information. We hope this letter will assist in your proposed development or re-evaluation of the land for tax purposes. We will continue to work with You in an effort to improve the operation of the existing facility. Please contact Bob Winter at 764-4163 if you feel that any additional hydraulic information would be helpful . Very truly yours , J. D. ZIRKLE District Administrator D. L. HOFFMAN . k District Design Engineer 'ERW:se 'cc: H. J. Semenock J. R. Olson J. L. McIntosh KF-01 • - yr+ leer S� n /df- D d l 0 Cu f , i ; 2 J � ,; I I 1 I 0 Pre self 5+ rC61r"• Cro5SiIJ ; - •NE 44+� 5+. ors --!�°U4e -t-c� i CUlverf 5fo. Ib •4-5d , ' `` S 2 465 n s co i, j+1-l.P <_4'L�, - , t b • i. U r'c0,, , )-0u-I e C/ � C'I j ) In,t / il Yf '1 w o r, 1 `i 50 •✓1 C, `_; . ,. . . I, r i,4 N j• 1 ‘ ' : (5-) I\i0ciC� Itr1�• C'L.i" 1 !`11J\ C ar-airier3e - J 7:. N . .,. 1)."A ,.. '. .• . /) i;• r. J ' 2$ F;it' J f If \ . . ....4, ;-3-,- R . r` u '" / \ . 1 ) : • 11 ) li r •%ill'r••• �-,.� i '�Jj 1, •!J 7•\ Ara 'I, ,•i, ••I }I 1 •. ( �I k� 'l \ � , !• i :Duth Point - ;•, .Y,3,9 1• r, li t f \\,: "" . h „ eta , . • • I.,h� .f,, r ,•6 ,i . :.. / r_,.,ieman Point i' Ii 1, l • • ' - ( Ili ;L. •,�., r �� ``1 A ti , ;. W 5 p -• „ :' ; , I r R, rfY01(. ' fens • ... :•-.•,,,, ,, • ss„';. i k i)., ti/rlA f 9.- U 6>.5 6 3 • ,'•• , �. ,,'.... _�, I} EN.TON . `.l _ i: . ,•..'.:.._•. ----1 -. .- -ram•-' , • r,:, ry r i„v, 1 • // ' • 4 • r ,,\_______ • � Ex, �z4 "`Coy>c . Co Xv. �/� • • • • .. _ • I � 1 .., 1 I - l'I ' ., .., , , ..., ,,,,, _ .,\ ., , , . , \ ,,.,. it%) .'. • . \ _,A ./. , .., . . , (.... ‘ • sC',5 .",-\ . \ . . ., -.• i \ • il • • Ex. 2 4 " Cc,nc. Cv/p. Ai..A..c, : \14." 0.,,,...„\-11'n ' , .,... \\_)-•, - _ . . • fro ® �®� 4`,.,\ `r • \ l ,-.- . • , y.. , • f _ &it --...: . --::,-.4"-": \ • --rz1;,\... \ . a. ' . W. 7 . Ex .B "P/ e Al? " \ - • '^,--"• 5to- 45'47454- a 0 \...; • 1hJ5 �7 ®7 >LU l l�tf G, V`� rll Q9 ^,� j/ .. 9 I . /——] — s O r . 1.i . • Base SG,eel- 5.67, Cc»1 . 753 5 „R: ro "P • u � ox, Sne. SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS P.O. 33x 1031 • PUYALLUP. WASHINGTON 98371 Puy: 845-8833 SCA: 830-3•.74 Sea-Belle Properties December 4, 197` 5542 Lake Washington Sled. Kirkland, Wa. 98033 ATTN: Paul Butrim Dear Paul , Enclosed is a drawing from the City of Renton. The Red is to be put in; Orange is existing. The City wants you to put in the lines in red. A hearing will be held on December 18, 1979, I will be there. Sincerely, • • / Y Robert A. Bennett RQ/ds • • • • • • i. , �, ! �'I r 1 Ii.'s f / . f.../ti 4i.q..:.:. • • I , '' - :(-----) / / (7: /.:• //1-1 Mi: '‘7:1 - ' a • :'_=.- D 1 J H. �nx1h� //Go- ��°� w — - :22///// 0\7-. nr ri ' • '-- .*:. 4. .\ , . . :. .., ,..„ (3 / i " .c- Cs" ( V . ;t III D _. / ii...........y . � .t!.. ' // /' 1 ,,;. 1 �.,8.E i-per--9 ------ ` ' / Ir/r/ � O I`1 , ....._.) 0-:)..1,,J0,: . 7"--•,,-. . -''' / .• ,-/.:'i /1r , v ',,. o' l .`. i /// ( \ e �:i \ 184 3 183 166 0 .S/4'4)1./p..,i.I.,.jc.(j'-IC_;.I_...f..II`•I.--:,/'_..1-- . .•:-. GOV•.. /.•-.-...L-•ro,'t 5I_v" `c,„\<..., ...... . .2.:-)n" zA 29.70 Acre \ P\ if h a n g v: • tf f,...''....... . . / y / ye --.S's 1.,. _ - \-\\N...,,..,,,,- .. .. . •t- / = ,... .e)%' '.\ .: 1-1- - --- ,,..-i •-• . . • ri 4�,gG Acre j ' .,,..:„•! • r"_'.,. - . Fr--1•;,-1 n_. 17.1, . 1,-: i'MWAtIlerfVe C,1„,• ', 4 I 1 ' IVO f II I , N -,4.---,' a I , \AT 4 \\ • • i 7 • • • 41 */ gq A, •Lt.;•,..,7 _/ N 4 1 / ' . ,••a iVrl tAI1-1— P1/1P 14/4i J/1r_p i't"•/"/.,r..,,,'',,,' -,,y.'z"'.!`,"."i,/,,,,•,' ,/ 'VC 1 Ia1/ 11II 1 ..1lI ( ' i / k I ,+__ a ., . ° . /I ,--- 7 --- '11 li (B4. 1\ ?,, , 1 , . .„—Th zrz \li \\\\ \ I _ • 7 1 • \ \ ‘Ikt \ . • • A 1 , i C ' (/ . k I , \\ ' \ t 4.3 i vat, ‘vm...,k-uve• \ 7/itii--------- --.. 1----, ',\\ Iiilii ;—, •-,_:--,__.r-- . , 11 1 1110 I \ ....... . \ \ . \4) , . • .14;3:€ aiii9.s74 i, . 0 9 til . V . . . . , , - ... , . , •'9 • • • . . . • ' ' • '• • , • , . - • 1 . . • , . . • . • • A • . , .., • •l • '' ' • , lt•it • , 1, • 43 / . . • ,Th.S c,::: '-' ---,. . . . , , ,• , 1 . . . • .- - -..... "._•':`,f,,L(-.3 .0`i•-.` ' ' '' . • . . . , ' 1 . • , • • . • . • . , • , ' ' , • •. • . , . • . , . . • • • ., , • •. ,,•••1 '''.',..5••••!1`.ii.'•i.; •• . ,••. • .• . ' • ' ,. • . • • . • . • . • . • . • . • ' I" • 7 • I . .. . . . • ' .P`•''''..' ' \,, , . ' ; • , . •.„,,,--,.,,,': ' ),••• . . • • , •. ...,. ' 'I'"?, • ...4.,r.„•-,, ..1 •7••• i 1 ' . . • ' i •!I? . ..!',•:"7,. . . . . • ' 1 7 I ..,7.\ • • ' • • • • • • • • • . • .0, •" • • „ • 10 • • • S . • • . . • • . . . ' . • ' ' • • " • . I I ' • . 0' S. • ' • ' . . •• ' • , . . . , . • • . . . ' • •• • • o • . ' • ' , . • . • ,, .. . . ' • . • . .. • • - . . . • . . • • ' • ' . • . '• • . . • • ' I ' • • • ' • ' '. . • • • . • ' ' • . ' ' I . . . , ------•••••- / ' \\ 0,1 • \ . . .1 • • ' • 'i;'''.• ' ' \ 0:1 , • t. . • • U ' • I • . CC •••......... .....‘........''''---- .-.-6 • ..... ; .. . . , • o. • • 0.•• ' . ,; ,.. ,. ...... .................. 2 . • I. ' • § •.--.- , • • .¢4 """'"'"1:17195"*--- ----.**e4 , . a• WI......, CO Co ‘610 LIN s,,S1 0 ter 4.....s! „-e• +all" s••••- r-r--.....^-:13 IN e 0'• • cr.' ,„...- , agl c4Ce es, Cr. C.`1, s',:3 ,r••1 S' ..lt •ds :r • .Le - r... r......c. .- oN. ' C•0 C.'S •'S .'..0 .... .............-........_..... - . al I 1 .7 1.• ow at/ . . ' • , • , , Le- ' • ' . . . . , I . • -......-.•.......,........t.•. .... . .- . • . . i . -•i•• 6.6 . • , . . :-. 1 . . .... " . . • . ,, 5 .. . .„ . . • .- . . . • • mr---...-k-ua-r-----04- . v' . .. e-r . ' • .z- un-. co •1....'.*. P.• '' Tr'.1..P..,,2.......... ...e...6.,•”1,....t.VP.t.0.4•••11. ...P.p o.P••••p........ . . •a ..o ',",, '.• '''' ,0•••• " (40 • ter er VA : , 0 . , •,9•00 •, „ A" , :•V'' • al •• .9 • ' a . (t,.,,ri,,,,;,,,, L, .... ,„. .„,,:,„,,..,...e.v..„.;.-.........,,;,,e•u..,.:„...j•-:..... ,,...s.i....„,, .......'...„.... ...;,..r.t.,-......,.. ...'•,.,..-„..,:.1.,.:,..............1,...?:„ „,,.. . . .• . ...........,.................. . ,,_,..• - •." •.‘..• •-,,,,,,s.--.4-pre,-- . , . v,...7 . - c,t., el • ai . .r..--„,-7!..-- ----,--,-„,-.• .•-,.:....e, . ;..-,-•. .t.... .. . -5,,,.. ......______15, 0 0 •"-'' - ts.Ve: --,',.., . ,‘.7..c X.::••••••••..., . „et•‘,;‘,42; 0 CI C3 sig t.:, . c:,c, 0, . . . v•.3. zii ..:.. -...1••••3 . 131 g • on . % . or* . ., - . ....7,1--: .= 4.1-ir..• ,.........- .A1-3-`''''''•'!'''''''%tr,--r--"'t;'.;t.i.- .4•D On..C4 •••• l•••• , „,........,..,,„,;..,:,...,..,...,........--....,--,-, 1,.!",,.. ! • t•.° ," " •41 , ,., .. , . , . , ,\, , , , . ...„ .•,4 .2. ,..,,,,, ,,,,,.. • • • . • . , ... •_...1. .-,...•,,,___`'' ..„, .....'."'••.'. "'''.,.•-•,,a '' ',;,..k:,::.1•27',. '"..'...r''',,., '''' 11 , __-.ol_t•-.-...--,- -' ' •" ' 10.••••111 -....• - --. -..- LAI ...... ci••• . '. ''.. N .1-0 • . OW• . ID , . faS '..1`,..••- ' 10 1. . -;,. ; I' !. •••••3„-F•-,.'i, -..".••-••• 7,03' 03 01 60) ,a. . . • ;. snots., '' . ••• ...,-,:••,•-,.•,41.9,09....1son...h.eri.ioaer!....7.•••1.,.....Tei•••••.,,,,.........r........m.,.., . ,.. . ',•• ,•. • • ••'.• '-•-',;Or "i,. ',••'•,i,,< .-,•;'' '•: •l's; 0- t- . 0.• J"..s.••1 ,',.1,..•OA•.•"' Lg.,. r Y.k...t ..,''',,,,,-, , • •. (I• a, 62`. •' 'ag 67*' 0.cl 0. •••.• „ ! :'V*• .' •-T-••:.,c,'!.•,''''•t•'. ',•,..-7,','-' '' '''`',1-,-,,,..." ' ' qv'. .. eir<0....,.14•44,44 btkr,..................b..P.,........;;..gb...,25•,:•••• ••••14•Arr...........7. ••,:•:•.4.J.:14.,,,4,‘,..0,, ,..., ...'''''Z'rir,..f`,'''',7,4,:i.•-•,..,,,r,1„,.• .....:pi- . • . .. . in .....,.., .,,.,,,. . . i.i.';; .. ,;";;‘,,,:;,4-f,i,,.,,,,..,...4,,,)c., ,,z,,,i4.'...-".",, ,.-.,`...•,`, :' ittr: a a = •,3.• ,. ,s3e.,•t.',.:.- LiC:14.;,:-.,,,,;.•..,,(vt0-•,n.,:','W'''-'1'. .. • . . cc ...0 al:c•-•c I c 4 en e..t NI eta Oi.. , 55 mii" "ea' e:::0 Ca VI •-•,. ;;;. ,": .f.t3, li,.,s • .s;C• ,1`. ..,•!;,. hoi.;.•"`3,'-„•.;-‘,:•:•,. ?•;';':''',,,"•ses rk•-o••::'.,.,)•••••o, CO C.... . C•45 7: ' -.2E,..,.•••.,•• •.1.;"..1i;fx.f••:::'CU.'...,,.....r•-•:••!••F.......?„•••,-.., • . - r.Z..... tr.x 7.sit .,•-,4.v:I 6,-v:el. ,:4,4 ,...,„ •,,.,g•Is, „„,,,,.„,,,„..„ .7.- :•.- t,74.•cz o-...= - lc& . •.,,,. c..,.....rs .kai a) .?..1,3 .1.••••31419••• • '' r'ig •• •'6.,,,:t*4" ••;• •,,,N.....r...i.,:,,..y...t,„„...,,,,• ••...,..0,...,1,,,,,.....7„...,, ,....„,..,, .t.v„-1..,,„.,..,..„p.,,.;., ,.,.....,,.,•,,,.r.q.,.., , 0.,„, gotL3, r2p .. tk. . ,., ••,,:..:," ...4••,••• •,,,', •.••”1.,,,, •''••1 •••••••••••••:„.,,,,,,, ••?,••••..1.-f 4..1 '' 1 CO 0(-4 T. 1 s 6=110 0,..e..1,z • , .. IR ...„,,,,,, ,,•..Gotgib,?.•• • goo fje....:,1,,?,,,',', .;6.1115 f••••"4 ' •....••Sr.'4.4•S•,„,,',,- 1401Cia••,.V.,,.• ,....• ‘•, 1?‘...,,•:..,,,,,.. ,,,....,,,,s.,-,,,...1.,;',..,, •.....?i••• ••-•1„,fli..-• •-Li ce • ....me 0 , , . '••'• "•••..,,.• •ere'../•.:••"..'..••• L. ..4•'••,4.:•' 1,•'.'.;1;1'4:••.••• .. ...('•••••”•5•4'••'••S.:;••‘'41 •4':'i•1•‘•'‘4. 1••'•••••4',.,r•4414.4...., L. ..• 6... • L., •••1 ta.ael sf's ts...ts•-• ids.-:-"` : ' 1,41••• . • :Y.;:lo,:;111.., ''''2&", ,etV" .;,',Is,1,•:,2!,;',„'. 9if..4 :',":.,"r,..:.„ ,'...g:',,,,;•,..,,,•,,-.,77Z. 1,,,... .., i..-„e.1 .:1, 1.. .d.,....,',•,-,,,...••,),/,,...S, ,,,t, e e al s. ..-:, • 0 Ill .0 ree rZ ".,.;., .• . e.:,. •:''''.,•''i 0 ..!'...01',• '.410'1,,,••• ••;•,•„•••.i. ,t, 't••••Pq ".;<I.,'r •••..",';`,,,'....•'.',:it,.. figke.:P..,,•,..• I.. 1•;•.•,,,,V,••••,...4.••••••,, t•,•••;47....,•1r;„ ••• •f.„::. 84..s.,7,7, ,. .044 '•....:4,7,•:.J.,‘,.7,0 tek .', ''• ''•"5 7,'•14-4•,,,•.'",..•I•s•:7..,..7.5:4''''.'777'. '7.7,.,..,.:,•''4•7'.7 ''''•7';7,r'...,'•;•-::,::••3:11‘tki. 1 1 :2.....D CS3 1.- •' . Z VI •‘. .r X : / Z1C -••••: =1V .1 j ••.'••;1..•.-.;•:,.,•'•:••-•••'' 11Z '...(g•4./,'„•:,'.'•••'.•1-•1.-,-••A,•rgo.ot W.2O, ',;c:-:,I.•••,,c=tc.••:41;,:•.•;,c•,•,•,•'.;'-•?•..•...,,-,,,y•,(.••••••...,.•...1:•,•?t.r:•,!-...''51 ;::"..:'' ,.-:,i,,.,,..;::4:::••,',••-A...„,i.li•k•t-,'',,'c.;•;':"t•$''•-'.•,;.4"7.1,t•y,.,,e,4;% CJ Sal Li C••••t' ' •'• •tplAo'')•4.,.•' I- '•+' ••••• ••••••''',•,11s•....c•.' ••• 7•4 7 Of '''•71••••••-.4,.ca.:.,• ••).',..,,,,,re••••P.r,•."1,,A.. : C" ..". • '•• . ' CC '•'-'•1••••'•• 4,„It'>i•••I' • es-le ikte'4,.;,-,.•1,t4 0.7...,•-••.•,...,••••ie.,4'','.1.•••:•••'•o• ' ' -'•'1".,.,_.••••• , •.•••••,,e•-I;•,1•1•1••••441::,• ro. -1 Ca.IC Or ft.!:thj-'' : rer,,,,_= • .•'''•. ct ra -,,,'7...!,:irl.:.•'"..g .:,•:.''•,1'. .tg- elt .....-,•';' • ...•'....!•:•;•:•1'.•W'.‘-‘"tP,'•.::::',• ••''A.`c.. ;,;',:;V:1 .. ,.-,'•:',"..?;',,k5ct,.:.\si;,-;4••,;,V,,-•‘',i7 a 71 a.11 la. a - ta• • ..• ' ia....-.::',',.,' ,pa;•-.,:''‘z,,-,a..togio z-....:v;,•••••,%`,7,kwQ4'.-:•,.'•:"-‘,`77'•4-,,;),,,,c,•t•):,-., -•:•• ••,•.'f•-se:',•:•-`;',''''o•• .'. 1,,,,‘, •re,,,,,,.;,'..,cr-,14...., L._, ' ••. ....„ , sa. a tu CZ 0 •, • ..•6 •. • '' '''••2''___J,- :•.;',• • •„' ,...,..."" ii''.„Vc,,•••ejs.,..‘,•;el,:,...,111;:.•••,y.t,l,r. 1,..ig' •',71,....;',..-'74M41,..e.k,",,;:t1P4"."•"-,,,•;43',-).-'4V ...:,.••'"-aria;•••,••,•:,•,' ' .g.,.7.gef".•,,,,,..:.y.....%.,tt W,;,',..i.*...t,l.f,t)(, „,,...';',,..• ;;;,..•.'4.. ....,•••..4.1-i,'S7•..\;`,,,q.;`,41:.,7:,:.".6,;1,'"•;:i:0;:::Sil'i.: ..7 a o i ''''.....Cs'... =CC. " 3,,t.t,i . ;,. s : = . ,,,-,. -....s„ ..4 . 7 ••,..,411Z- ;-'-e•$...,..,1....0.• ,';‘::;•.• ,,,,,•,;'.'"(y.i••• ....;0•.',•,-,: .v,...",A,•,,,,,7„.•0.•14'1.,•,),...,1,.: d••••••••10,4',1,•:...•I'l, _LC 7.L. :3. cc =, „. • ,•.,,..•., ^' gre ,'.•:•I:. •••'• 0,0 or-•• ',..•• • •.'140'4''..:•'•'',:• •.;••••;; 1••J• 'Q.':4 44',,•14.:4',-,•:f fa.ilif.,,Ii'xk)F.v>,2..'•6..r. .., )/';ti‘04,1, ...., tv :.- 6- • -;-21'• ,,- .,,,;.', i le . ,,i,„1., ,c4.,:-.l',••:';'Y.iitz11,--'?,i.,.':t!: -.%,../;:•..`V;:-)••It1.11,5. *',''''',1.).,,s• ''''.:•:' -(A-1.';','' ...9 •'•o124•1'.;••'..'''::.;"''.14E:;''''''••••••••,,''...••„i'Z-1:'•••40!11'F••+, .,.,•,:::•,-.•.•514. .i.,,4,-./:,....?-1.T.•::;...•,.4„ki:L:'..,,,,.;,..'c ,r,,, ._.,..,.. c.., _a:E a -.I • ....9...3 0.... , . .. • • 1 ..•: r', 444.44''•'•/,v`5,::•1 •":• :••%•"-,4,i.,!1„;;,-..-'i'f•r:,..,.!:,, :4•,.-..4i:Q;•;‹,z.:44.ce0M1,. ..1•;'',",:itk-'`'•' ,?.. 'S'`r"..7.'1,•!.; ye c.c.tb. • *e..,r ' to Ci: .. • • . Era .-. •.....- oohs 5,P,...,-!•••erehreerkee,,r...si:',••;.,?1,•04A'.. `;`11.:`,.'r,,I;;.'"•,'2W. 1k,:•4',:...--k;•' ''.1.'rj••'':':'il•i':',•••''.4:1•:It'•••::',.•.%'"' k.•i cx;Lei VI CY VIVI . ' '' ' = • '•'''''a 4 'i.iu.Ae•-zt,:,,:ty,kr,.i:, ...,;:w,..,,,,t1',.,(,-,, ,'•ir'It'f'Y',I4'•?-'.' 'i4,le•'.•:•'4'.:,1,1. '104',10V-..1,v5 ' Z-,••••t•••••I- a -.1 a 1.0 a 0.42.1 CZ ' : a)'•OA••• : , . .• • = .•• ,...$•,:,,,,,04.,•••••,,•;• ,,,,...,;,-'1..,,,.../1•,"1..:.!:•••F,•1.1.te,?•-•:".1,•;4.•..i .•Vi,•:,•••"?..,•••••;•.....414:1,3•1,fre;,,,t.;fc...„.;‘,,i',.•„:,..„.46,•,,:.i 1.,,,,,, i s v. V la or ' • W.;,-814,.;,.'''. , • , ', „,3 .•-•.,,',,..'•:„..i.I) ,„,40 7;k•••.•;•r,,,4 7 4itlifei,•?0,‘,..41,,"OAV/A.,• ,!!,0„1,,.,•;;.••q!,,V,;2;t1„.:; Nf,''' ewlimr,41k1,a,...'S„,iflto';,;•,);;1,1:;4140 ...a vi trb ...§krti ...II 0 • ..6 '• ' ':,.,•". ,' 04.4, ,,.:);,,,;0.2.4 co:Lp.,,s•o•ci.4 06,....., s.z,l,tp-ata 14i.:0,•,-.,11-•.,.0,7;A:'•;...tmv;f1..:,,.,:•.„:;-; toll.,,,,,....z'ir..--,‘...•cor.c•••.'1,4,-,,. .•.*:-...i.i*,- _.,cr.a c'e a.....c VI 0- o-s a. ........8 rer eir ..,.., Cr. , •-• -•' ••,•-;-;eat-.4410.1;A; co 00•4,* :,5:••••;4,44....W. •!•',"..\;',•, ,Ofzt,,,),,:a2..L4,.....,.„...._1,-,,,a,".1,•;--..i,,,,,„„.4.4.•;ii•;1:•,,,,:•,,,,,•• .1..2.,,rt..,•f...4,4,....v,7,.,.4 ....0 WO Li I•••"••14.11....Il CO...• CP.7.0 07 , ''. 4.14,,,..cm„,.,,.., ,,,,,,-,..., ••••• r-,,,. .1,.•.,..?,,,,„,,r,..,.„,•,..............„4,••..r.-1,.--..,,,,..71,...,.....,•-• • X 0.- -0 .-at-I 1.41!..r••X 00 .?2,47,..ckg.h ,'• 0-- •-••.•,"••'' ''T'' ''''‘izif''''i'.‘"Yi''''-4)''.40"....."7.?;,•...4., 'le.' '',.! '8,:li,....'':•W'.,-;;•.'",'•.'eji'gill'••;•.:.,,.,.• ••"•;,,.410.11;;,•• -,•,...•••.•,,,k,e,,e, •,',,,.,.'.717 ' ' •0 PI •• 0 :04:si",•(•%, ""•:4",:"•rtj,"'''S,„"g''.',.',`,.,1,'• • •1 ,,,,'"t",IP•Aes,' ",,'V,S; 1-:•#•.sel','•••L•-•;,r,,s,,,„•••,13•,:avt,4.,:,14.tteglr•4r:!...,'le' • ar ars , r- in . "3 ' 1 N. 0•4•.". '- ' ' ' ' . .P'" PI '''• '" IN PI ••••,:o•''','-'•-•,'"'•"•'" 't,"??,,'";• 4,.'4'",•••,..).';','',1"1,:;''At6)-'45. -:t7'•••••', •',:--•"'"f"‘:Wo.i,,,?".4sse'.',5:,: r'•"?,'"-.',:2' .>,,,4,1,":,4tC",-.0.77,"V„. In ". C•••• ••••••' ".' ' ," •" '; e3 0 ''• •, -0'•".',.,-,,,•••••74g,'.01 ''•,,,j;...,•.L.".:1•;kr.:.itL'',1.V.,:,,,fp'4,..•••.....ir,i.6›,',',..,:p4".1,...', ,...7e.:.11%'4,14,4'0.$4f,:i''' . r$ 0 ,, • - Ce •'' e-• ..0 ;•• •.: - .r.• 00 • %Do g ';‘,.N1:1,11T;•03. ,-.,.•-_,.w-•,'-i 94,,v.fv,',-7'•,:•:;v.•-•ow ••••:•f-.; ,, :,,.4,,,,,.,s,;,-:,-f,..,3:,>, -c,••••VA;;;`,1,,•;:•,11,p„.•-•:-:,,,,-,* - - C•II1 t C•0 o or • , - . . , -,.P.,', -.•4, ;, ,'‘,-, ',•-•,1•.'•,,,k;,';'3i• ,..k,''I.:::;',.:4';',.,. •:.,2-::':',.•••,1( •t•-.--:'''.-i' l'"•'',,'' c... cr. (0. • cr 'Or -., •:- ,,, riAt . •t.g.• ,',.'•;i•1....ty',.,.,•,••!q•-1.'•',•i•41;4..„1'•••‘;•,,.••••..•:•••••;,-1.;•''.••,,,.•1 „ ,1,,,,i ,•:',r'• .,....-...1 •:'.,:.,-..;".•,.--7,-I."1-':,'•....1:• '• '•'' •• 4/.- '••:•1,':'f•'''4:11-'''••'•,'''‘',• ' .•,..-'17'.;,•••,.'••.:••1.1„4..11:-,‘••••••',1".q.•!‘t,• • ,••',..1fit,•"•,••.P.'•.•,:-',.:::....,!'''•- •''•,1.'4:1`1..".'s'',,?,'''•".'r. . I .- - • ,,•,.• '. ".....:•;.•2.•:,.....,,t..•..,•.,.. .1.,.:74:...„ ••',,.',.",„•.....,•.1.?:;•!...:;.;•';•Ai;"t...t,;;;40•••',:-.;:•••:.:-;•-,<1.,,•,..... ..&:..•••••.;.?•,,•,•••••:4?-,,s,,;,•:...,,,,4''',1, . • . . § r.,-,C3 .•". 4..• Cb .'.. ", 2;%'•,!, :;,„..,•:. it„ ••• .: '1‘‘;:-!. ,,,•:,,-., `• ..,.:.,sl.-,,,,,,,- ...•,,,„.• • o . , , ... • _ ; ,4 -..,1 ' ..,' , .4. , ,,4. • 1 I ''''''q?•1• •••;1‘'4'4 • • •• . "",6".'••,,.l'14•••••• .4';'••'•'•'•••4 '...,1..,••'..• .''<,,, '7;'...,• , •• I-;.r...A .tc•c;p,,,•• ,-.: • ,; ..•i...;••••, • •-...•z:, •••.,--,, ,-, ....•...0 t•••. ••••••••.,••• ..... ' . CO • I AO /7...„ „,,, ',• '.• •: "' ' ',"•,•••`;''A!'''..':',,''' ,,,, •• •;',, .•••1i;:...,01.:?4,':,',,,,••••••• . •,•••;or?;. ,...'.1.,, '' .1.•. ' •‘,.•.,,.?..••• . > o'i••••,- •,•••"5•• • . , ,•'•:4 t ,, •--..• r•".13.1.,7 •• •.., . ,,•, .,.1.•. ,?.,;,-,,j0•-:•ef.:-•• :•,••••..:•• • •'..i. "1:.,... ...,.:,.....: • ''''' tol . ' 4 ,1,..•e:"... tee _ . '7-:•• -.., , z !,•,,0-• ..„,,,t..„. . e-- • , , • ;1., k!.1 ' 1-0 • • ':.±to ''•.-..... ,r:' i,''..:.•• .„,-.-:, •••• , selt.erkr•- •.•.r:c.•a; .•,,,- .1....... • 0 0 ? 1 rr • .......•••,-.': ce It • 0 z •-• • . ' . c - ''' 041...` I. - r-9 i ,,,,,:.7,7. - ‘,9,.= - .•'' •:. '' :7,; ..;,.•,' el'''......•.-. '4,..: . e.....%t ,•V. 11;,.'''.:1•:•.' ..417.1 CO Ct.1.,1 t....M as -to ' • ' ; . '3,-. ;•c."/ '4'4 0 L.0 C•s9 t1O • •.;',..,....iio i,,• ', .4r.t,...N;IT,.,.. •131-••••o..,',• .. •- ?••••:-,..; '1 Ci.-,O." ' kV; • 0 C.3 •••••14.1 _. . v." . ••1-C4:•'•c.,....3•.„czt .1°X C...,..,••••...0 •: . .r. .0 •s•.:: O.:rd.:eV. ' C)0 = t.e.: _., s er)':'.:: I a= 1, a elit ? •••, •c) = 0s 11: •e.r. 0 6"lt ort, • •••••."17...:..:* s f21::••••• ',..„C•%.,. ::••-•,,,,,!1,....• ..t...16112•;A ....t:p.,.7.L.;••••.'"'..;•••••': ,...:1..•-••711•1::e."-":.••:01. LE 16'4-....9?, k.90 kJ 493..u. C'.%4,,,,-..:1 73 Cl) ivitiv.c. ,(.41 .7.,irni, :4.4 1,A zi. • ...t! .:_a ,t., 1 •.0 Cr 1.0 fi Co C>WM Cs ca .i.c-c• ,A, ,••••••:•-•c if.? •,••••"' •47 ?o•••••ILAS',•/...i C."11 •••••....4 lre•e ..........-,A,........: . ,.....,::, -,,,... ....., I,-• ...c. ' ::,.... . •,-4 : ,..- .• •,..-:•-• () I t.... 0 ....3 0 C.9"4e.:LS ••-•1/0 0 9- --"C9•;\*: ....att... o'",...-6•2›.9.. . .7.,9 a-":•0 .••4....1CIZ:.', 0 ::•7 4" ' 4•:' . 0 ..-i...a a ... a. c•••••Ic.z-m• n....1-1' I Z-./Z 11 a . • 'C:%t••13:1".-15 - ct-tal-e••a..3 oe c"....-s141.--• 0,5' ,,,,,-""5....,. 7,...9.... .4-9-, '69,....d..... v.---' ..,'''-3,„,..'-.,Stt-)•s%,----;4.i...„`"'..s"-''" oco lid oct •75 on o o-mto :. .;.10,,,,I,4 ep c.,2,4 plzt,,.. or- irlmw-t•-• "10,15 ,olu.c4= ,z,.nect=',..vtav21, :e-. s s•- r-)cs.r-•s e-' P.)ill••••s••••• fl",..., > '9'1C) .C4T. C'..°Ctl 'aC4 4.'1@' ''43 • Pir...... z9, re 0 •:3r-c....-- ear.-•ate.-.47- torto;••;•.1'; la plorlz mczaz m_am..c. i - tv=„11,.... awo- ,ffto ow .::r ctit ,„, • ,..4,04w..,,, ,..000.....01,t, ' Ma,,...mint,14,..g04L ; ,tit r-ea..cm maatercr m=vic. ,10.1 . va 0,0 t-1 1 PI , 9,1 . .. • ........ ....,.• • -• • • ' -,-',.;.:,‘“:•‘, ' .....,,• • •. • • • ) : ; '?%.... . • iC . .. . . .•• , ' • ... , .. ,..<k . .. . ..,.., .(-- . ,. : . , .. . • . -....,:. •,,..} „.".. ..i,, . . , . : :, „,,,..,...,. .,. „ . : , . - 1.1 iId_i ,d { •� :k; STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION �'�: a. WASHINGTON '•!:f h �I Office of District Engineer,D•1,6431 Corson Ave.So.,C-81410,Seattle,Washington 98108 ' ,! Dixy Lee Ray Governor December 12 , 1979 Bennett and Fox, Inc. 720 E. Main Puyallup, ; Washington 98371 . . ; CS 1744 SR 405 , Attn: Mrs'. Debbie Maroon May Creek Interchange Drainage Gentlemen: This pertains to your recent discussions with our hydraulics, staff regarding • the operation of a culvert in the vicinity of 'May Creek Interchange on SR 405. . The 24" concrete pipe was extended as Structure Note 56-73 under Contract 7532. The original length was installed under Contract 4128 in 1952. Apparently you have had discussions regarding its operations with the City • . of Renton and the occurence of a nearby ponding area is a factor in the , grading of your client's parcel . The grading is apparently necessary for the implementation of the highest and best land use. The Department of Transportation takes the position that storm water has been handled by this culvert with no reported damage or flooding of the road to , date, For this reason, no improvement of the drainage crossing is currently proposed. We recognize, as you know, that the storm water management is the responsibility of the City. In addition, legal remedies are occasionally available for resolution of,storm water routing issues. A copy of this letter will be sent to the City for their administrative , information. We hope this letter will assist in your proposed development ' or re-evaluation of the land for tax purposes. We will continue to work with you in 'an effort to improve the operation of the existing facility. Please 'contact Bob Winter at 764-4163 if you feel that any additional hydraulic ' information would be helpful. Very truly yours, J. D. ZIRKLE - District Administrator . ' /Z. / e,---/ .)1 a ,Aik-021-1.._e_-- . D. L. HOFFJ\N District Design Engineer ERW:se d cc: H. 'J, Semenock J.' R. Olson ' J. L. McIntosh KF-01 • 1 • . • 1 • . e J • '0. , -'it � • d A.1t ;1 • 1 •1 ��Imo• '• '"• ' 9 • • YY 1 S/crrri ' .Drciinac e CohQ.afirons_ =? - 83 ci c res ;� • - , 700 7e e4 �r�' -.. '- /2. O-4 °�v . . 't.) = ; f$�,$e c 950 e-i -,) s - /2. 11 % . v _ . 7 14/ec I ', 2,7Uo • .1_ •5 U . a 53 . /2 wins • I . 76 ( a a `� ear' 6`for NI) k'.�., 5iornh Mooaf, R r,4n - o ., • Seccalc. Curues) • HQIA . 35 (, 76)(53) . 1 , ` , fir (V 00A-4 ! Siope .1,VOL) d 110.0Q.. -1-o eciucvI 3 , 5 % (char-i 2 pc.• A6, k.C. Storm Alai/loaf . !)0ule.Jr r ‘\.l i'1-I. G hect.d 11�a s r dQ.,p$ I1 o1 3. 7 're2.4 , ( �rorr Gilar#; •-�•t f 2c . . C. S-1-0( Ala r\oo () II -'IoIA) l� J � , . 1 RA SJ�zouh' /1,0i Cri,.'c�. < .r p r a /3 ./e tve,. I. / j I . I t^6 /�� I • • !C r^ . ./ /,i).I* ', y i '7.--fr 7 //- /-i'';;':: ' 1-- .. :..••Ir'1/2'.i‘,1 \%' v I: '-- ((.. \ 7-:g''41;;;;.:'i • / - Y ' / -.- ( -4-' - ' ---\ • .' 4 / • \I ( (--.•,- ......,-:-.,::: i 71, v/i ( z/ -/2::•-• /.--• 4i-rj-j-.\ \\)! r. -1, \ ,I‘. \\.....\14:1 1 1(./.4,--N..7.46)\ s's Stlj \.*44; .!•_;, ..::7-::::; • ,,, (--' e,,,,, /„, h. is)/ I 1 , ///rN___,.... ._.; ) e\c (..1, (i /4/// ()/ 1---)c-±ili) 1 /. / Ve, .,- ,---- '.\ ; I 1 i ; 0- ,4, --,....,./,'; ,,,,- , n, • i ) 1 a . 4, ,,,,\ a\\, :Yr //Hi 7 C /.';•‘-/,' i// ',i'\_./'--4L--,:,...i '. *--,- / / '; / ,-,._ 1.1\. - ). \ .-'1,1 / i\,\j // -- \\s-..-- ‘i--- ' .Te--,i,v/ i 1,,,,A; i.') //j,•-"' ,--_,', ?///. ---,;:,/,-0.'"'-... tr--3 - :, \.. - -/,p.i Cn - • 11&,\\ '''..:--' .' \ 0 , \ ) TP/ /AC • \ - / / , s'.'•-•, .- ,t) ./. // 7 /iN- - , .i / / , ..::.•r / I 1 1„i 1 . .i/ / /1- 1..1- I / / . 1 , i .•.k,,I , / ' ,,,// / :11 it- , • •/ . 1 '' l\s'.\*;'. .: \„.1).1 ( 1. ) riii=1-•}1: (\\\ _______( . . \...0 f I .t:• .-1 -4- i'" ' t.: ... "'JP'- ----------) iji 4 , c _f r• ,/i. -4 it, .1 1 , \ i .1 i / ) - ; 1-73/ c\.,v i ,-,, f,/='!'- . -•i--:-,:::.-\----:-,-,-- : .5 . ,i' i---' ,-; (I /•it -ji AV i ( ;) . j 1 r'.71./ 1 i I I 1 \DP-1 1 / ; 1 • ' \--?---- 0 ' ,..'S' ‘, 7.... i\.. ' 2-r i /•';'.: ) ' i r; ‘ . / 1 ----1-, /LI 1.h tZ:),,, ; .--,e, - i, •------', „ :333 /1 . 'tisf ....,. .1 i, -\))/ \\ • - .t./X t'it-.6\ --)1 /'fid I i'ti\ --j i I \ \ -, \\ 1 4 / I (, ! N 5 •:---.__1„._ i / ,./ ;.__/.,-. ! ___ \ • ‘ .„--- / -,_,,7 ,.,.....,/ j / f iti.f \is 1,,, t..\\cr.:,•:\\\11-.lily 1 1 / _1_,<.) / -,..k .. • , ,, rt: !.-1' .i. ,,( / ,\ '• 7,, i cr.,' ) / / 4.,' - - • \ , ,(7-', ,, . . .--,4 :, , , .• ..,.. _ • / L ,C i 1,;-. ; f 1, bi .f. ? ) 1.F..: i 1 1 1 I 'II"'.- 10‘ l:kc.L1., (. \., '‘i \ 5,.: •,. cY::::,, i i :, ) _.)• '..4, \ ' 41'. ''.. ' ','...:',/,. ?'''--.), ) " i f i ,ti (( '1,.1,,...' - .. . ,•.,,,\,,,,..,.....,',',',.•.' ..,..•,:,a. \ \ i -1,I. " ''i''-::, ! i fl;C:' 7) ri‘! El '111 "i % • " i' ( j) \" 61'. 1\ '....' 1 1\ .'• \\A . . •/ • •,I / r" ., •,-,., 1't \ \ . , •• / / ,s,•,,,A.. . • •,..i:4,?;•,;,.... ..7.7b c..71-...0.•=•;0'.f \ \\ \ •.:- . '''; . \ 1: \ ' -'t, \ i ' t.c"." `"1' '• .• / (. --.) /, C, II' :. iii .....' i \ 1.1 \ ; \ '• \', ' - 1 \ \ t , • ‘ \/ // , ..'ii.e:tc p.1 I ., \ \. `. \ ) ' . t \\•, \ -,' i '‘.\ -\ \ ,, \ ! , ' - .,' r,) „ . •: - , , .„ '‘, \ . ; . , . I \ . \ -• • ' ' ) \ .:, i ('N \D ,o) )'. . . ......- -4 4 4 ' 4,--....._4.,---_,.. •-744 k\s"•.• - & / 4 , . ' •,7:"-1 /I i / /. ,,, - 1-- . . . 1 4 , 4 I • --... • - . / • ‘ \ • •N - i \'. N' \‘II i ' 1 1/ 7 ///. 1 / ' ) i \\?:;:•' -''''',-----, )\ [..,', 1 \ ,'' '' ''/ ic ///-/A-.-• ::• 1 \.4.1 ,' :i. I : " / ni'L*/ '\ \'' -'.j3 .\ Th. 't . ' .\\,\\ . \\,......_, \ . j,,,?,,,,,i,, __=______,.., , ,,,c , •: :\H' 1.i •;1 • A,a . 'I'----------'-'----------)' ,.... \ . . , v __ s_,_ \._‘___,,_. . _.2f....,,,_ _.... , ... , ,..--; ,..,•„4. ,.....-- _.L.f.'_______ ! , ., _\... ._______r 1 / / la . • :=____:_._i___,... __ - - _L__.t.. ...;;• ,--...--=1:,,-=.------=-,-..,- \ \r'‘'`'. \.---- .1‘.'C4\ it'-'1 s ' V- ''•'-'I'-'''-‘--\ '''''''''''''''!r-t -------"'- -74-"'"'P---1 '..1-: r - . 6 Cir tri 5-r. r .__,.. .,., „\\ ,,\:; , , , , \ ,\\\\ i •,.. ,.... .________, \ , \• . , \ \ , __. ii!; r--- .- 1 ii , \ ... \\\\\•, \\ \\ \ ,,'" •-._... . '--- .___... .• \ \ \. \ '), C \ ' , ••• 1‘,_ , , •:•,...-'"' •YR., ,••,-- ••• • EF e r-zs-. • t,: C• 'I ' • 's i •.'..- s.: ,. \ ‘ ‘ \ s -- 1:f ik: - 1, ,..`i! ' I--17 i j i (....yo\',\\\ 's, '• \ N. ---, - ,..,---/ ,) . .:\ ri_) \3•N‘ ):' . ‘ \ :,----", E-• q / 1 1 \ \ ‘,. \ \ . ., . ''' )_,/ __..,... ..'::-.--. ) \:-' I1 \c.,1 ) ( - ,_ ' 1..;, ; l'ili ii '.--) ; 1 7 2 ‘1 '' ''' ' ‘, ': If ''. ..-.- -. -. • --- --/--' . -- :1^ ' •-•,t , ./ ( J i f y, cc., 3- \ ,it; ' ,--% ‘,.-.). .1 a.,,i,c.)::;••••:,.../ r... , • 7--' %. ; jy!4 • -..'r*.) 101-1..1 \ '1 \ I 7 I/7/.1// . / •__-7-.-- , ' 1 \ :i I•k\-,- . ) ( I 3;`,;i 4 1%-"N,( f•-• . ‘ 1 i 1) l C., / / / , -----"" : ( 1 / ,q's . :','I i 1 (I'- 's r.;;-\k---/// / //1 1 /XVI r / //7'. .'. ' i i ..,'''''' ';'-,,L1_ :i It/(' i . 1 : •St\.,..,\ • / .et /j/ ;::•:1 ‘ \t75.,'-; . / ' • 1 1 / r:. 1 r /// / /7 '-,j e\'---) ' \ 101 -• t •\_____ _..;. -:',E-,:. f.-.": ‘,.... ".\--1 It ,si \ \ I 1 •.1 ( G ' • • - : _5<- r - OH' J.,•,- - 4`,-,;:': • ic •ot:'A" .0 \'''''' ri, . ,,,rs4,... ....,.4.1 , boi ,,,,,,,,______117.2.__' / \'----- •,;IN. - ..... . \:.'^--s,f ; LI'i,:,A;" -r---• \ .y c.'i.1 rs' '•(\\,V (=Air, l' \\ 1 \( F pl.•••(- \k ‘. '', ,..4...i.,.. :___.,\_____".,--_,,,,,,,--- \,. ) \ \\ ,i.„ .. 1. .. , . • ' <3,1;i( , q t t N-rr----- ------ • /. -_-__Y -----____----- ---ie'' LC:>\ • ‘ ,s. - .?--_ .. ,-; i!I i '' '11 ))11 ) 0() - \\ ) 111\P-er ) ' (( , _V- t•:1\---_-1.- : . ,, 1 ,f.1 i P 0 1 • .• / • .,,0 • ', ,"'-'.i., 1- i'il( ,,._ , , '' I ' i . -/"I tir i I i 1 ' 4. ,..er.,--- \ ,, i i i " 11 ‘,, _.\\1-,;:',.. CO fi•j! L."")0 -.1''''' P 1'111 \- i t' -3 --:• --; i ..__ ,,...c•1 'A • • ..., .!:.', '\1 ,S,,',\, ,,,:`,.,: .--•J:11 ... ' 1 . ; • . - . . •' ..\::..:.,'.• r-i!:;:,...f.- --..,- ----... >I i, .. w . ; 1 1-J-r 1 1 '' ' ° ' ' It 3 .--.--ir-il----_-_-_-...='-'- _-7...-1_:_-:--:.=.--‘4.:‘ ); ''\ .1 A ii7 .---.' t\i's VCii • k I •-;:-,!.....".::=7',-,--.. ..--2:.''.::-.:,_...,..,,,:------,, :;,,:,,.„, .„.;,,,-,,,,,,„--.. /1.'.' ./___., i ,.??.., ( \ \ ? ‘ ' 1 i t ° . 1 ,-,\ ' !. ! • -,:----_ • Nt•---''..\\-1-'ti; '-ht-..., -N 't:t.--4--- , . 11 ; c:) 1 ' 1 ' i t °. iET:3 -..- l ' : ‘111 • - - ,-._ --„,..,_„,„•,.,„..., ... , \ ::,,.---, ,,ili.,/ „,, ,••,. \in: ,\•:' f \ % \ . i i ‘i /-- 1.---; ...,, i t , • • . - '',7z4../.,q, ti, ; ,-. A /111//ri ---i lit i _\\\,\ \ \ i 1. 1 \ i \ \ \ ,, lit 1/2 \ \ ; ' ' -1._,1 . I ./. ' n cl-, ( \ 1 1 01 . 4.i.i. AEttia.. 4-77717rdi '4 - ,,l''''',,, ',,:*"0•i'M ; PVt . KaiiM • .4., 0... ei, 1. 1,...;,, „ ,,, .,.. 1.7.7 *4. •,..„.1. ,.„,,, i.,:l. ,,Y=f P,'' 4'4 't o '11",` •", 1,741,4 4::6;;YjITA, .f.l. ;14 ;:I tO 7r- ko: ,,r , 717,..77.,, 47.771.C. .17tiM I.:, ;:,,,,, •,, 7'•t,;.;;.-, n.4,V ' t., ibiLlyiV - -tlti:.;•0, dill ,F•••1.4k '.1 " -" r 4. -10. — ti- 1" s--,1 10; •!.'t 'AI k,k,e ;,,i, `iX '"t, '44 s:`ii!, ile; 4?' A.,,k ' A -0.,,,,7, ,,,,;,.t.i ,Ff: 4: 1;•4 'il',' ' •'''. 'A" F''''' ;I'P' -r-,„ -2, q, ,N,,,,,,,tt 5,,,:.,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, ;160.4 c'' 0,L.4,7 ; ,,,* 3,,q ,1.. :,,,,,,4:- k',274, :::,*ic,: an • :,„, kt kft ,,ii h 13 q.„ ,, •:',0 ,v4., iit, ,, -.'11, -4.:' 'cti- ,..,:-.:, bl.P •'' ' '''''''. OP i%.'1 4, 'ii:'i. "id 4 le Pi ‘A't.' T'..! ..4.'. Z-• ,.i,',' 4•f•,. t.tr-' .,,,,,'. oy, ,-N, ,, r••• 4'; qtt-,e.,,, 14 ) ,,,,,;:- :1-0„,py 41 . (?I iiY .4P. ':..r"Rl' ''''Ai gt V:, 7;?•l,,fr: ;:.K 1•••':,: s'--'.' •,•,..?-• k '.'• )1., ..2.1,..H '-' , `V V,:,.I,0 •,.. -D,: !"'"c„ „:;, ,o.,,, i , •. GENERAL L(ICATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPE2TY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD, N . E. BETWEEN S. E. /bTH STREET AND SDEI 80TH STREET LEGAL. rtESCRIP.[ION: . I A DETAILED ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPT, . , , . . , 1 S Po/STE* TO NoTBFY PRITERTY OWNERS OF Ar s. , . ,. , 4 o - .,,;, 1... if, 4 . ,.,: ..: ' . ,: 41 ,i t 'it t . r , i ,* h ,4". '1/77,-M 1, .7, >,,,' i '.: ''• *, ,., . 3;4%•L.-,;.: P '''' '1.0) 4: . „ i '-4 . . A . ., .... ,,,,,,,L,c,_ i: ,,,. ,. ,%ma 1 t-i , ... Tie-, it E HELD , - FIN CITY COMM CHAMBERS MUMCIIPAL BULDONG 9 :,:,,,, , , •% I ON DECEMBER 18 1979 BEGG AT 9 00 AM - . • --,. ,,,-. , ' ! . , '2;1,, 7 C. fi, '',. C 0 N C E PEA N G t'S TrE Rfl 171 i 1 — • 1 ' • ' a 11;1 (77 •NE , , , \ , ' i or- 4 * I R,.6.,.. ,. [i _ - , riaFILI—AND __A_GR DE._ L4B=4,--ZONE.4+4-1--.L.-.E1. I 'xi r L. . 4, 7 gl t--44,..... : morr nn. 7n1 f . - 14 =3 ' 1 W U V Sr"..;.4L,L-7-1- r?r-VS EA"B tk.A.,E-;,P-RORE-RT-trE-S-)-11 , . 'I§ 164,„,,M Ti1,.....). ,. L.: • .. ..ra 4 111 !c tr It_ 1 V;211 ' it .1k il V§Y Ea, .4. — , W ia n - L lM tAT 4 i1 ilE . 7„,,,,,,:, PE LA , 11;111.i : ., 4. 'Tr •il Ei I . , • • , FOR FURTHER INPIRMATION CALL 235 2550 ' MIS TICE NOT TO 42.E REMOVED WITHOUT P"PER AUTHORIZATION , • OF � . • • .THE CITY OF RENT. ON - U `60 4 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 1 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ,MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 09 co' FRED J. KAUFMAN. 23512593 P 047.6-0 SEF"C°6 December 19, 1979 Mr, Paul Butrim , • Sea-Belle Properties 3711 Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. Kirkland, WA 98033 - RE: File No. SP-402-79; Seas-Belle Properties; Special Permit. Dear Mr. Butrim: • The Examiner may grant a continuance to a time and date certain for , good cause. shown,. Since it is impossible to determine the exact. time and date at which required information will be submitted in the above entitled matter, it is appropriate 'to dismiss the application without prejudice. • The applicant .under such. circumstances may refile the application without waiting for the expiration of ,time limits set for rehearing the same or similar matters. The matter then is set for a hearing by the Planning. Department as .any other new item and legal notice is similarly posted and published. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner • cc: Parties of Record City Clerk Planning Department (Matter dismissed by the Examiner without prejudice on December 18, 1979,) OFFICE OF THE LAND USE KFARINS _EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. • • APPLICANT: Sea-Belle Properties FILE NO. SP-402-79 LOCATION: • North side of N.E. 44th Street along the eastern edge of Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks special permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 22,500 yards. • SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on September 5, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on September 11, 1979 at 9:35 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that. the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into. the record as Exhibit #1. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Site Plan with elevations Exhibit #3: Cross Section of proposed. fill Exhibit #4: Letter to Roger Blaylock from Donald 0. Norman, Quendall Terminals, dated September 5, 1979 Mr., Blaylock.reviewed concerns contained in.Exhibit #4 relating to drainage in the sub- basin east of the applicant's property, inadequacy of an existing 24-inch culvert to accommodate the current surface water drainage system, and the effects of elimination of the subject site as a surge basin in the system. The letter further questioned the finding that environmental impacts of the proposal are insignificant in view of the existing drainage inadequacies in the area. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: • Robert Bennett • Bennett &•Fox • 720 E. Main Puyallup, WA 98371 Mr. Bennett indicated concurrence in the recommendations contained in Exhibit #1. He advised that he had not been aware of concerns addressed in Exhibit #4, but objected to utilization of the subject site as a surge basin for storm drainage. . He stated the applicant's intent to design the project .in conformance with city regulations for storm drainage, hydroseeding, and fill material. However, he noted that removal of. vegetation would be required in order to allow the project to proceed. The Examiner advised an ordinance requirement for acknowledgement of proposed use of the site prior to approval . of a fill and grade permit in order to protect the land from remaining vacant and thereby allowing exposure to soil and creating excessive runoff for an extensive period of time prior to development. Responding to the Examiner's concern was: Paul Butrim • Sea-Belle Properties 3711 Lake Washington Blvd. N.M. Kirkland, WA 98033 • SP-402-79 Page Two Mr. Butrim advised that the property is currently unusable and future'development, although. unknown at this time, on the commercially zoned property'will comply with the zoning • designation for either commercial ',or multifamily residential use and will occur concurtently with development of property Owned by the applicant east of the site. The Examiner referenced Section M,.2 of Exhibit #1 which recommends approval subject to reduction of' development intensity in the northerly one-third of the site and provision of heavy landscape .buffering along the northerly and northeasterly property lines, and inquired if the.applicant concurs in the Planning Department recommendation. Mr. Butrim indicated agreement with the.conditions. The 'Examiner inquired regarding proposed methods . of' controlling development intensity on the northerly one-third of the site. David Clemens, Senior Planner,• advised that the method would depend upon the proposed use, i.e. , reduction of number of dwelling units for residential use and less intensive activity, reduced building coverage and increased landscaping for commercial use. The Examiner noted recommendations submitted by the Police Department, and asked the. applicant if he concurs with the conditions. Mr. Bennett advised that Sea-Belle Properties will administer the fill operation and ensure that roads are kept free of construction debris, traffic patterns wi ll t remain uninterrupted, flagmen are provided and proper notification of the project is accomplished. The Examiner requested further comments in support of the application. There was no response. He then requested comments in opposition. to the request. ' Responding was: Mrs. Clifford Hoof 7240 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. Renton, WA 98055 • Mrs. .Hoof, resident in Tract 168 located north of the site, reported that the proposed project will destroy an existing wildlife habitat on the property which has inhabited water, fowl as well as deer in the wooded areas. The Examiner reviewed the environmental checklist provided by .the applicant, and inquired if the applicant had addressed potential effects on existing fauna utilizing the property. Mr. Bennett advised his finding that, the property is mostly cleared of large standing trees except in the southern portion, and existing vegetation consists of. reeds, cattails and grasses. He indicated that he was not aware that larger mammals have inhabited the area, but observations of existence of rabbits and mice have occurred. He reported that existing water fowl would likely seek refuge on Lake Washington to the west when the site is developed. • The Examiner noted concern that approval of a fill and grade permit on the site without appropriate proposed development plans may allow the property to remain undeveloped .for. years and unnecessarily eliminate an existing, wildlife habitat. Mr'. Butrim stated that economic conditions would determine the length.of time prior to commencement of development, but because the site is currently served by water and sewer utilities, and other development activity in the area consisting of construction of a 140-unit condominium .is occurring,. development would probably begin within two years. He advised the necessity of acquiring the fill and grade permit at this time to enable preparation of the site for such development. ' The Examiner requested further comments in opposition to the request. There was no response. He then requested. final comments from the Planning Department staff. Mr. Clemens indicated .that 'because the declaration of non-significance had been issued by the Planning Department prior to receipt of Exhibit #4' and awareness of storm drainage problems, and because Mrs. Hoof had raised concerns regarding wildlife not reviewed by the applicant or the department, the validity of the declaration should be further reviewed, and he requested a continuance of the public hearing for a one week period. The Examiner asked if parties in attendance would object to continuation of the matter until September 18, 1979. There was no objection. •The Examiner requested further comments. Since there, were none, 'the hearing regarding File No. SP-402-79 was closed at 10:03 a.m. and continued to September 18, 1979. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on September 18, 1979 at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building,. ' 'Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, requested that the.,review period for evaluation of environmental significance be extended to October 9, 1979. ' The Examiner granted the request to continue the hearing to' 9:00 a.m. on October 9, 1979, and the hearing was subsequently closed at 9:10 a.m. • SP-402-79 . Page Three -,NT:NUAN:'E: • The hearing was opened on October 9, 1979 at 9:07 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. The Examiner advised that the Planning Department and the responsible official had reconsidered the environmental determination of non-significance and had issued a proposed declaration of significance for the proposal. He indicated to the applicant that the hearing • could be continued to allow the opportunity to research possible measures to mitigate the existing drainage problems on the site or the application could be withdrawn to allow • • preparation of an environmental impact statement. Mr. Robert Bennett, representing the applicant, indicated that although he was aware that certain corrective measures were necessary to the drainage system for the site, he was not informed regarding the requirement of an environmental impact statement. Mr. Blaylock advised that due to the drainage situation, the previously issued declaration of non- significance had been withdrawn and a proposed declaration of significance had been issued in order to allow the applicant an additional time period in which to evaluate the matter and determine appropriate modifications to the drainage system. . Mr. Bennett requested a continuance of two weeks to review and resolve the issue, noting that if the requirement cannot be resolved by that time, the application will be withdrawn. The Examiner indicated concurrence in the applicant's request, and continued the item for two weeks. The hearing was subsequently closed at 9:18 a.m. and continued to October 23, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on October 23, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Mr. Blaylock advised that the Engineering Division has had insufficient time to review the drainage analysis; therefore, a continuance for an additional week is requested. The hearing was subsequently closed by the Examiner and continued to, October 30, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on October 30, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of. the Renton Municipal Building. Due to necessity of further review, Mr. Blaylock advised that the matter would be required to be continued. • To allow the applicant and the Engineering Division adequate opportunity to complete review of the drainage system, the Hearing Examiner continued the matter until November 27, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers. CONTINUANCE: On November 20, 1979, a memorandum was directed to the Hearing Examiner from the Planning . Department stating that because the drainage questions relating to development of the site have not been resolved, the public hearing scheduled for November 27, 1979 should be continued to December 18, 1979. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on December 18, 1919 at 9:10 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Due to recent issuance of a positive Declaration of Environmental Significance by the Planning Department, the Examiner advised that the matter' would be dismissed until environmental impact on the site can he mitigated. He noted that upon completion of review and resolution of the matter, a new public hearing will be scheduled and meeting notices will be properly published and posted. • Mr. Bob Bennett and Mr. Paul Butrim, representing the• applicant, indicated their objection to the procedure, noting many meetings have been held with state and city departmental representatives over alengthy period of time in an effort to resolve the matter. The Examiner indicated that he has no control over the environmental determination issued by the Planning Department, and in order to proceed with the public hearing, mitigating measures for environmental concerns must be provided for review. The meeting was closed at 9:25 a.m. and the matter dismissed without prejudice by the Examiner. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 18, 1979 APPLICANT: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES FILE NUMBER: SP-402-79 ANALYSIS: The applicant has discussed the drainage situation with the Public Works Department on several occasions since the last public hearing. From information submitted, the. Public Works Department has recommended that only the east one-half of the site be filled at this time. This appears to be based upon the assumption that there is sufficient area in the western half of the site to provide the storm water retention that the entire site has been provided up to this time. The Public Works Department recommendation is based upon a preliminary estimate, not a detailed analysis of the drainage basin. The ,Engineering Division states that additional data is necessary prior to approving the fill on the western half. RECOMMENDATION: The information submitted by the applicant is insuffi- cient at this time to recommend any filling of the site. It is recommended that the application request , file number SP7402-79 , be continued indefinitely until the Engineering Division has sufficient data to complete thorough evaluation. Roii t,uii r ! allll Illy uepar'GltlenC DEVE PMENT APPLICATION REVIEW :ET Application : 5PPe,AL P '02.M«-Cbr Pf! 4Pertde (SP °- C'601•7 71 Location : . SA) I, We/44A Ad /ie 4 M Af. S. �t'd�',S alrNFOYAS Applicant: l' ka46 /h ® ,04cleg TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 9/1/1 757 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING 030, - Publicic Works Department 1 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Nr��1 IJTI JGRF�CGTHETTONS R GAR]]ING THIS ASP ICATT ON SHOULD BE PROVIDED APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 21 7 AT 900 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE K(, r, F OUR DEPARTMENTIDIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATT NID THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:UO PM ON 9/�®/7.9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ....._.. Approved Approved with conditions t/ t Approved t, ?;: j Ci6754-11.2._ 9//eA9 Signature of Director or Authorized Represents ive Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved X Approved with conditions Not Approved • Gr . Pk/ Signature /vs /( ' /7�of Directoror Aut or 'ze Representative Date NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON) WASHINGTON • • A PUBLIC' HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON DECEMBER 18 , 1979 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER . THE FOLLOWING PETIT ONS : • 1 : c5 ALB_E_LL_ELAR.O.P_E.RTZMi• APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT . TO FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE , File SP-402-79 ; property located immediately east of Lake Washington Blvd . N . E . between S .E . 76th St . and S . E . 80th St . 2. MARK HEACOCK AND PETER TIERSMA ( EDEN ESTATES ) , APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING ACCESS WIDTH AND CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH , Files E-449-79 and E-450-79 ; property located on the north side of N . E. 28th St . between Kennewick Pl . •N . E . and • ' Aberdeen Ave. N . E . • 3 ., DONALD J . ROHRSSEN , APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF OFF-SITE 1 IMPROVEMENTS , File W-440-79 ; property located in the, vicinity of 4827 Talbot Road South . 4 .\ ARTHUR D . GUSTAFSON , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 14-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION ( GUSTAFSON ADDITION ) , File PP-441-79 , AND APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH , File E-448-79 ; property located on west side .of Union Axe. N . E . , approximately 200 feet south of N . E . 10th St. 5 , MERCURY MARINE , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT .• OFFICE/DISTRIBUTION AND• TRAINING CENTER IN M-P ZONE , File SA-442-79 ; property located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Lind Ave. S .W . and S . W . 41st. St . 6 . MICHAEL R. MASTRO , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT 175-UNIT MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT IN R-3 ZONE , File SA-447-79 ; property located approximately • 800 feet south of N . E . 4th St . and approximately 800 feet 'west of Union Ave. N . E . between Greenwood Cemetery and Union Ave . N . E . Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in Ole .Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED • TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 18 , 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED December 7 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION, I , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to beforq me, a Notary Public, on the 5th day of December 79 • SIGNED .L.e„ im."€7,1‘eiv,hf-AL_ . - OF R4, kk*.f �; THE CITY OF RENTON �� ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR s PLANNING DEPARTMENT °94 235- 2550 0,9�TFD SEPI°4� MEMORANDUM November 20, 1979 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By: Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner RE : SEABELLE SPECIAL PERMIT File SP-402-79 The applicant is presently working with the City of Renton Engineering Division and the Washington State Highway Department . The drainage questions have not been resolved, and it is unknown when the information will be available. Therefore, the public hearing should be closed and the file returned to the Planning Department to await sufficient data for the responsible official to make the final decision concerning environ- mental significance. A new public hearing will be scheduled at the appropriate time. RJB:wr15 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER ':V2 0197% A�! i 3 a I .� pF v �► o THE CITY OF RENTON V `� Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 n Op ° A � CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT �. e<Q' 235-2550 0 It°SEP��� November 20, 1979 Mrs. Debbie Maroon Bennett and Fox, Inc. 720 East Main Puyallup, Washington 98371 RE : SEABELLE PROPERTIES, File SP-402-79 Dear Mrs. Maroon: The Planning Department has informed the Hearing Exami- ner that no new data has been subnitted to re-evaluate the drainage situation. Therefore, we have requested that the public hearing be continued indefinitely. The file will be returned to the Planning Department . When sufficient data is presented and a final environ- mental determination is reached, a new public hearing will be scheduled. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director 1 Ro r J. B aylock 14.° Associate Planner RJB:wr cc: Paul Butrin 5542 Lake Washington Blvd. Kirkland, WA 98033 OF I �� o THE CITY OF RENTON %$ 0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 usil. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT co- 235— 2550 0,9gT�O SEP11.1° MEMORANDUM October 19 , 1979 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director L0 By : Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner RE : SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES SPECIAL PERMIT SP-402-79 The applicant , Sea-Belle Properties, has been working with the Public Works Department to determine the drain- age situation on the proposed fill site located east of Lake Washington Boulevard between S .E. 76th Street and S.E. 80th Street . It appears at this time that the Engineering Division has had insufficient time to review the drainage analysis and will not be able to make a report to the Hearing Examiner on Tuesday, October 23rd. Therefore, it is recommended that the item be continued until October 30th to allow the Hearing Examiner time to review the input from the Public Works Department . RJB :wr cc : Sea-Belle Properties Public Works Director RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 1'C T 2 21979 AM PM 71819a10113r1211 i213t4i516 r (. �� vo ,. ® THR CITY OF REIN TOIL U ®® � 7. , n00r,`_ ,,- ..-- MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ' LA A CHARLES J. DEL-AURENTI y MAY(. R -_o _ PL AWNING DEPARTMENT - 13A c� 235-2550 o��PED SEPZ��� • October 8, 1979 Ms. Debbie Maroon Bennett & Fox, Inc. • 720 East Main Puyallup , Washington 98371 Dear Ms. Maroon : Confirming our telephone conversation of last week concerning the status of the proposed landfill by Sea-Belle Properties located at the northeast corner of .the intersection of Lake • Washington Boulevard N.E. and N.E . 44th Street , the responsi- ble official has withdrawn the Declaration of Non-significance and issued a proposed Declaration of Significance. The subject site is located at the focal point of the drainage of a small basin which contains approximately 400 acres. Fill- ing of the site, which has been used in the past as a natural overflow area for storm water, will impact properties both upstream and downstream. Therefore , a detailed drainage analy- \,L sis of the impact of the proposed fill will have to be reviewed ,,; by the City of Renton prior to a final environmental impact determination. The Public Work§ Department will conduct the review of the data submitted by the applicant . The primary concern is how • the proposed fill configuration impacts the present function of the subject site as a storm water storage area. Mr. Don Monaghan, Engineering Office Supervisor , will review the analy- sis. Please contact him directly for specific data to be presented in the drainage basil study. Please find attached copies of the Withdrawal of the Declara- tion of Non-significance and the Proposed Declaration of Significance. The Hearing' Examiner has been informed. He will ! ;;XTv Ms. Debbie Maroon Bennett & Fox, Inc. October 8 , 1979 _ ,Page Two -- - -- - - decide whether to continue the hearing indefinitely or request that the applicant withdraw the application until all supporting data is compiled. Therefore , the public hearing will not be continued on October 9th. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director j "Ti) • tom- ���,c�L _ Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner RJB :wr Attachments OFA. R� t� * o THE CITY OF RENTON t$ O Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 z o • CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09 co• 235- 2550 AD 4P 9�r Eo SEP1E° • MEMORANDUM October 8, 1979 • TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director /J : Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner ' RE : • SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES • The Planning staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner continue the public hearing regarding Sea-Belle Properties, file SP-402-79 , indefinitely to allow the applicant to provide a drainage analysis of the subject site and associ- at ed drainage basin._ Th.e' responsible official , Gordon Y. Ericksen, has withdrawn the Declaration of Non-significance and issued a Declaration of Significance (copies attached) . RJB :wr Attachments { • RECEIVED CITY OF REtVTON HEARING EMI*dER ocr . AM 81979 7,8i9r10,11 12�I�2i3�4�5 f� VI 0 TH'• AWL OF ���� PLANNING DEPARTMENT <C„ 200 Mill Ave. So. 40 "` O Renton , WA 98055 235-2550 LA!' P"1 Q ft �< F o 09gT�O SEPSES3 '* tR ® ' U II C Application No : SP-402-79 Environmental Checklist No : ECF-494-79 Description of proposal Applicant seeks a Special Permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 22 , 500 cubic yards . Proponent' SEABELLE PROPERTIES • Location of Proposal North side of NE 44th along east edge of Lake Washington Blvd . NE Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was determined to not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment on SEPTEMBER 5 , 1979 . An EIS was not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030(2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . However , the declaration of non- significance is now withdrawn based on the following reason(s ) : mu New information has become available to indicate that the ro osal la P P may have significant adverse environmental impacts. The prop:sal has been modified after the treshold determination , and such modification may cause the proposed action to have significant adverse environmental impacts , or 0 The negative threshold determination was procured by misrepresentation or lack of full disclosure by the proponent of the proposal . Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title PLANN G D RECTOR Date October 5, 1979 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 10-79 PROPOSED/ � LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCEL >Y }?����} 4M-fr% Application No . SP-402-79 P PROPOSED Declaration - Environmental Checklist -No-. ECF-494-79 " FINAL Declaration D e s c r i p t i on of proposal Applicant seeks a Special Permit approved for fill and grade of approximately 22,500 cubic yards. Proponent SEABET,T,F, PROPERTIES Location of Proposal No. side of NE 44th Along east edge of Lake Washington Blvd NE Lead Agency CITY OF REN'TDN PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to to have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS fa is 0 is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : (1) The subject site serves as a storm water retention area. (2) Modification of the subject site will adversely impact the drainage pattern of the entire drainage basin at both lower and higher elevations. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of signjAcance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significant • (1) Drainage analysis of the total drainage basin to determine the quantitative impact of the proposal upon the hydraulics of the ...... subject site and basin. (2) Reduction of development intensity in the northerly one-third of the site; (3) Provision of a heavy screen landscape buffer along the northerly and northeasterly property lines in order to provide an effective sight obscuring separating the business properties from the single family uses to the north and east. 4 Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title P ,Jog NI RECTO . Date October 5 , 1979 Signature „%�� ����. �., Q .fir . _ ,, , City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 AAV OF �, Y.- 0 THE CITY OF . ' ENTO off '',,. rve. ; !!�y' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2a3 MILL AVE.SD. RENTON, ASH.081158 - CHARLES J. DELAURENTI D MAYOR - _ o PLANNING DEPARTMENT .1) co- - 235- 2550 0RT.0 SEPlsks'�¢ August 29 , 1979 . Sea-Belle Properties 5542 Lake Washington Blvd . Kirkland , WA 98033 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN 6,1 ZONE , File SP-403-79 ; property located immediately east of Lake Washington Blvd . between S. E . 76th St . and S . E. 80th St . Dear The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on August 16 , 1979 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for September 11 . 1979 at 9 : 00 a . m. . Representatives of -the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director By : PS-evf41 . c 3 Roge J . Bl ayl ocl Associate Planner cc : Bennett & Fox, Inc . P. 0 . Box 1031 . Puyallup, WA 98371 U.)--- it 1 I i.t t11'74i ��fi�'i J F t`r�`•,.' y F'1'. f .��• . - F '{AYH 1 • 17:i .34 Tv VIT 9, 0 v, !t*..I r :::. ,.. v • — ,,.- k 7w. , -,f , tr,t1 4,P; p 1 2. , eil tip s• KII � R. t ¢, 1 i4 ,,,�� t. • .y t fil'A P` �'.'aFp At '!• ` �Cr 4.''' „n .'7` Yw �43' .r F, f'i C . I GENE",TL Lx•CATI 4,N: A D, •r-' Alt DRESS: PROPS IzY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF LAKE� WASHINGTON BLVD. N. E. BETWEEN S. E. /bTH 'STREET AND S. E . 80TH STREET LEGAL DESC, PT!•jt: . A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE .IN THE RENTON ' PLANNING DEPT. • j • o S POSTED TO N4TOFY Pil 615E --TY 0" NERS F • '44., ? 4 'Illi li, ; i .410"'tttjt.,, II 0_, ','4 4'14 ,,,, ,,, 14,,, .3,3, ..,,,'4,„ ' , ° if I.W....;`,"/ r' .F L h ��yy , 4 l' ') '1' .' ,Ir.i , 'il,,i J,rv�1.4.'Z7W- ''u,r',."^...};P;t yl '�N,J'.9, •iz;';1,, ;E.,' Ll^1`` - �':a rrr = 'x,r ,��q..;.w 'i.�.:.a,a�o: i�: i,'u-.:�::i', .,L��,'`'.::....._:,4:6A�''w � :r�•i4',��, r,•,oa,: , .� ���•��� '-. , ,':-.n�.f¢[y ,�t�. _ . - �. �}�.�'� .., ..:.�,swLa• :+:_y'3�:..3`'m.lr'.Z"•'4.::.,s3:� '�<.:�:�9e:+�+•�L..%bk..fir-L.:,w,.::.,.<:e3rta:.:+:-..�w:';:szs�s-�i�::!:sA,:;',4'ir:.: $°�t+k�i4b�4�+::�iel� {gg • �,{,p f®� =�ys� R. .,_ i 1I' {®� •gape ` ,. '} ?b. _ '''" ;IN .C3 V• ' �"&a II,'.a,�7 ra ` �+I 'rp �It 'MUNI ', f*r'' '�'3 ,I r` �' '?';'"° '•''•r 4 •.•:t+'# • =t; ,I,. ; DECEMBER 18,r 1979• EGI Gp� " 9..00. Ai j- ;i; -{ o . • {; vd'' F s i;r',L t+ t;1G • ti r `, ".1/ s a , ,,,'• ., • e•.. , .n,. ;•• ,, L 't,,, 5,® .�CE ' �a.+�H •'p S. Ch�.I�� 1 br,r✓ .( 1• • i� • 1• p y . it- • tFpp s '. .,r; , • �.1: ;''dE ;,X•• •8I<, •111Y. fry r 11, . 4' +� '. 3. .W Ia, '',-'f "y. .f + .'�', •:ne. ,' `if; 'rx!i, ;t.� ,.! :t. ;- y, ,•:,t s •Rs•-- r,.rr 1 dt t•• t ;q ,11t' ,,+; '1' yt y '.✓ '1- 'fi ,F '• '• - ({7•.' elr: Yy!; ! . �i,� i'',,,' I, 1 � .i'-`' „,1,s ',. • '': ,,i 'r ddc ;,,,or .,' s•- I "lc,„ y,,,'�"ate`...,, - F.i. w ,,,1 it , y 1 '.� j twa !, +.y s !rF rl I q 1,1� 4y }jY1 ' '' . 1 I ,•lW t' i - . t II� 5`' I^ y i ;;Aa ;j � •; 4 D I .-• + iFI N®', .x.. xt-, , ' i .4 ,. 4 f ''s ,xi �. 111 ,- ic7. r '" r� P. F-- .)'''{�*�y' �'r''.;,4 - '•.�> ' ,rl 1 ' � c�1 -r 1„i, +v I� ( �� t}y ><III#L �. frf � �h y � �,lc„��,f n�V.t�l9 �gl 1� � r� 5`I 1 1 ,11'r. r 1 - •}fir ','ir '�'He„ V' •( x. • a! _.. - •' '"�,, tut t lc A'! ErY�� ' ) 'ta r.,-, ,yr', �1', ' f • ' 1c'• 1 sue''' x•� 1 r vM t.,lz !' x. i' "•'d err La [" ( , � j� Ei !�` ,# 7b .+{ , , IT . t1, i ,Ac,J,,4. ,�%,"lR,a :esz: • ;1; ;t� • iy `n u'" i'.0.4,'� n r« Ri r.4a p ' +1 z., - �'.n�m 4,� v rt yx ., . , o r': ( 'I III j f II j• z 00?F RT1ER !INFO',NATION CALL 235 25 .is f I (j i� ri, �// •: I NOTICE NOT TO -. ..., V 418 t UT PR -E ; f' h 8M TO ' 1 :. i- 1•';� `":F.i:;," i,,,,,";31j.;{,' mo; 1' tl 1 .C,''•w'':.t)�e�'i�'h.;;,A4y-fit"`• gyp:^ st.ie':;:`.a.'ry3 ,,..G .� .,13 "`.r': -b \ 'j !I. .-.,....1,.,Ai..;?-- r'd:-_.,. f• ,�4,..-.i,.I:i?,};>,ii•?i::;'!Ai.Z r' 'k�1'd@?+.,,,;'$i,y i!"+Y•; ,,,_" ieeze. .vi,. ...--- . . ,.0.4 -,, ;-,T• ,s..., ,.:',14 ,• ''''' i f,,. 'I'M ',4r,:',.tt.„..4,t,',,, „,, 1 :•'44, 'i 714 1 t- ,1 • 41 ' liM, ti14. , . -, ..., 'e ' .''': 111.f • ...lit -C '''.;• 1*,e,1'+,.1. I I i 4, \-• " ?t-'60,1-i• - 4 Loh, ;.•'44 '4- , ,...15 „....,,,. ; ;, , ..><•,,,At' ' ." '• ,Cr',,.;r4" •4404:t 4 ..'t I;.4, 4 t,',' ; '',4 t`,:.1., 'f,•;',1',.;,,,ti r,,,,,,,,, i ,! • •.4 .„%i , , liffrIg. '.;', It,',;'..;,,,0•,, 141'.'1'11„.''''!, :c.!of- 4',„•!.,,t, '' "''' g%,4 ,;','. ^''. llrr .v- '1 ''' 11;. 4,,,,, 4...1'44 i .1- ., ,•,,f; 2 .; .. .0111 4'; 1.4•R. i) i :t-`giv': ' -..`,'-' i'•;. r-T.., ,,'''. t: ,,%!':"; Ay ,4, Y.;1 •,' - ,4 '''r.' +• . t 4.; t 14 le 4- 1,/ ,44. , ' t r ''- ' :'''•''. 1-' • •,''''''14 'A.. . .,,, ...., , t.,,, ')A:--, ..L.t.i 4. 4';;•;: , , ,',:'.."' 0` ' ',,t , ' 41 GEIERAL LOCATION: AND, S' ADDRESS:ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY EAST OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD BETWEEN S,E, 76TH STREET AND S.E, 80TH STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT .. I S POSTED TS NOTIFY PROPERTY *INNERS OF ,,,,,, .:,.. il.-,i /4;, ,14;:t4 t, '''''',, •; ;Y:'4,44,„ , D. :'. . ., ,.; ;,''g'•".'.-,,.... ,t:, 4%.,4., . , , ••_,..„.., ,,i.. . .., .' , „fr 't ',;-?, 441'4' „ --• J-,,,, .3!. .... i 'N'ille' _ I . ..,. . •A ' '1;•:;• 1 ,, iii?... ;FAA :•• ''.,..- ' i- './ TO iti E HELD • IN CITY COUNCIL CHANI;ErS, MVACIPL BUILDING ON SEPTEMBER 11, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. A.M. P.M. CONCERNING IT.,,,t,,,'-,t!.,,, wi r lir III Z 0 .I=4, I,'+' .4 ' r +: It. , 4. I , (TO FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE) 1 ..:, , ITE ., . .. .., „, .,,, , ... s., .e. '..„i lit, r 0 A 1.1.+,+-. 1' ' '' t i.,'.. . a ' t", ' q r' ii'-'1' v 1 . ,.. ... . + .-, , ., .„ . ,...., -I. , "I', t-+ : ,',.. ',,+I . i• i V 1111 S Ho, REL .:,.; .4, , ,. ,. ,..., „ . 1 ''' ' 4* E . ., .1/4 ...L. . sA .:,. Or . , -• li . , . , PERMIT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 ' • THIS 1NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 7'' 1 , A t ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEE,,TppIINGIN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , THEWASHFOLLOWINGINGTON, NPEAT FF��IONS:FR 11 1979 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER 1. CLINTON H. BETZ , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3, File R-400-79; property located on N.E. 9th Place between Edmonds Ave. N.E. and Sunset Boulevard (SR-900) . 2. BILL HEATH, APPLICATION FOR FOUR-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL, File 401-79; property located in the vicinity of 1303 N. 26th St . 3. SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE, File SP-402-79 ; property located immediately east of Lake Washington Blvd. between S .E. 76th St . and S.E. 80th St . 4. WALL AND REDEKOP CORPORATION (HI-GATE) , File PP-403-79 and E-393-79 , APPLICATIONS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 30-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUB- DIVISION AND EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING RELOCATION OF A SECTION OF SIDEWALK ON MONTEREY AVE. N.E. ; property located between N.E. 20th Street and N.E. 16th Street between the northward extension of Lincoln Ave. N.E. and Monterey Ave. N.E. Legal descriptions for applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMi3ER 11, 1979 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED August 31, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the 29thday of August 19 79 . SIGNED • . . . / l % i � ' 4� i f v 33e 3?0 . 43 i e � I . '�i J H Baxtetf b/Go .., / / �0 .„ / 80 Q- � - /it i Go., II I/ , • gill C3' B ����' O t�Nr` 0 0 O / �/(� ` �� � } 185 n 182 - - -46 f -- • e I J Z6S O3 Q.i I "SYn is�.. °I) 14, I kg > • /• N , . o oo\\\I jr I /i/ _ 0 I ) ....I o • c�� y ;' 4C r e e _ = ' •, , „,‘,z \ yy/ h +. er 0 1,...2 (-----) n . , V .... Li`l sfi ��� 184 183 166 j° Gov t. Lot 5 �' ' ). ..' 29.7n Acx� I n t • e . r`:.• h a n g i. .�� '.::. . 1�� 300 250 gay I1 --4„„„„..„ „„ - , \ ..:. --- - - - _ __ - -- --- ._.. . fit_ .-3,! , , ,7 C- �F'F F t1 � - �� 1 -�-- o in ,- ,' r ` � / jam, �- - £, p � ! !' 1- :; Gov �. Lot I/. ISE NUMBERS g11 .LAB' , . // 4 � — .� �� 90 Acres �* 1 n ' ,D -1 t ) II N T K. i . y i `1 . 4 1 1 • 9/24/79 Fred Kaufman Hearing Examiner: This will be entered as an exhibit at the public hearing of October 9th. Roger Blaylock 1,1 . rY C`f v, 55p7;13g /g79 /ti N i t RCA-554i /7 4iJt k //ecrcz r+No 60 , 7 Redelred, IVA 98055 Re: ..Seyel .,56--zze Feeeparres 6Peci46SI' / �,W V66--Pz y cco/c /2ileiD . By e P©T xJrAc_ LOSS op �1.44' •69 ,/P /4° , 'y sPPc/AL P 724i r Z2,% .I/oPery co aztJED /5 Fizeffp , AID 7&• Riee CWHU ry ,/As z ec/r5D 7W/e006/7 7N6 co iTli!orr oP zi-// I' iw ii WAD/TM if o� P &Pa4 J/1Poer&ir pihr 9r riot 1954 4eEs ro ax.1 dew z/( OE cxis/4 0 id 06147 e)i • Tie Low ' / a. sosmiLl 1F rJr CZ,op_s ,4 D i Uey /9 rri • 27046 Use C 6aTvu77/65 'Mr R's'B2.6.4, , dD A P4/,t1E eX /tip , -a6u1. ,''S/x/ s P4/r 6696R01.(1 ()/f zip/if 7A' /rs rn/2 r2R6, / 4T. d&f2rRi y /PE 56w6 uci r�x/oall ziPe. Ale-67)3 05 7//e- of / � �W' 5roP1i5 , ,4fl cal/Docr6D .cold //i R Urfoe/ 7V r �5 Te f T 4 , xr ,. 4rt ,... . ' . , s ' ' '` T .� s' , ."' ,vim , �+ . 1 ,A, illi ' Tv . . . .1- v V ,ltir,"/".!, 1 .0.. it _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - ___ _ • How Hundreds of Wildlife Species Have Benefited From. DU's Environmental Management ..c-,a �l ?n:v "a ,�cy'} i- s SV E i 22 c,i,;:l , 7t ., ". aa rp.- �1. ,}., '',",-'4.',,,"7,`,44,3, F;-4,4',,rdk*,, C.,JO,°'.,,'%,.:,,;", ni,540,': ,,,,,,'it, -4 t , f .t+� L. , P.. C: rxj j ai ,� t " 7�"i "?" Y, ''s'. '{"� 'M - � 4 � .. - . '6'ts s kt a�-•�:. b�`7�u, :.�(� .h 'k a" f r� ':":'Y !r � etai � � �Y�;f��a�r�C�r�'��' ,€x�#4'.�� ',�,""r�.'t,"4 `�'� it 'r �� ; r.,` e++p���'yY� x �''a 1 � '�^ � ...,,• p.i "^ ' i e�.i es�� A,y'�"'+a'�e.J�d3"'xea�Y'rae.'��.'A'�a�•�""p.. l..�E�G: '. V'I iS` fi^'_ ..,. ........, y... - .,.�. ..... ._ ' eD�., .qA ",s�;" ?�o-�•�,rt•a fi�� )• �'�+{��5• t!l"x•�,k'.°9c�y ,a M1b '!`f!Y N.r s. n '* a ai . r -.,.. in' ' g `: b'Kg�Z. 1 -. yip ' t' tg,: .r 1 F c. , 3 r ".. $ •'t..:�„4.; "s `1 ` f a§ r� 1 '` ?"(i p x r,w ',4 .;.: 4 k �� So`.. Ig{ ;ice° }5 �ET, m . i - : '1 ' ' ' V W I ' Ili le 44,e i'V''t:NAA'1,* ' a yy,� ",.-,'-',6 - e_ ,,,,, , v.,=.1%,,,,,-tv,L as '��"` • This is the story of a pioneer achievement in Biologists estimate that additional millions of the business of ecological management. acres of habitat may be needed to stabilize this 1 It started over 41 years ago. continent's waterfowl resource. This land may At that time a group of American conser- no longer be available after the end of this dec- ‘iationists banded together to organize a non- ade. Therefore, DU is engaged in an urgent race profit organization designed to help protect and against time. increase the supply of wild ducks on America's Perhaps DU's single most important achieve- flyways. Today you know this organization as ment has been the solid awareness it has instilled Ducks Unlimited. in civic and government leaders on both sides of The efforts of DU and its companion Cana- the border of the urgent need for prudent con- dian counterpart have resulted in the creation or servation programs. restoration of more than 1,500 "duck factories" covering some 2,700,000 acres of waterfowl If you have a deep concern for ecology and nesting habitat. Geese and ducks and hundreds environment, perhaps you, too, will conclude of other species of wildlife now live in areas that the work of Ducks Unlimited truly merits . developed by DU. This includes birds of all your annual financial support. kinds, various species of grouse, deer, fox, bea- Send your tax deductible check for $10 or ver, moose and, in some areas, even whooping more to Ducks Unlimited, Dept. TM05, P.O. Box crane. 66300, Chicago, Illinois 60666. Rev. 3/79 r , y- gu 1"4 ; C 1 Hkz ' . , r . ex ^f.r,y yy j. 2 .. . ,, , : 1 ,,, 00 Lip - , ,,, .t . Wh t is habitat? Habitat is simply defined as food, cover, water and space. Ea h species have unique habitat requirements, some more exacting than others. Muskrats and ducks need marsh areas, ruffed grouse prefer large wooded areas interspersed with brush and open spaces. Deer enjoy a variety of living condi- tions: forest lands that have a mixture of young and mature timber, brush and grassy areas and farmlands with fencerows, marshlands and woodlots. When one of the habitat conditions is altered, the wildlife population declines because the habitat can only support a specific number of animals in the community. In Washington, increasingly more land is being developed into lakeside condominiums, suburban settlements and shopping centers. New roads, intensive farming techniques and drainage_ of marshes all contribute to the loss of wildlife habitat. x 'xN, j P �A N�, . 70 604444, a 44 .. 50 pr o 40 .. �4- 30 1 , Q 01Nd w 20 4ar' `h rr5l ti a t - *4•40 adt Achek pnri.::,.t 510 k 0!,..4,1*:r,','%4P.V.' ill^,sr."‘0. .1;,„:!,,,,.. ,z,t„ 0 „ ,.,. Habitat Contro led Pesticides Destruction Past As Pests Always Illegal Exploitation Rare Killing • - i s',- - ..1.,. n, .4.4.ti,,.•.1 $.i; i .41i-c.. L-.-i,.-;s+ion Fnundatinnl pro 1e s: HABITAT DESTRUCTION: In the United States, each day, civilization destroys an estimated 3,500 acres of valuable wildlife habitat. When land is cleared, marshes are drained and rivers are channelized, polluted or turned into giant lakes, wildlife declines or disappears. The passenger pigeon is an example of a species that disappeared primarily due to habitat destruction. PAST EXPLOITATION: We have learned much from the wasteful commericial and po- litical exploitation of wildlife in the past. The ruthless slaughter of wild- life in the 1800 's resulted in the 'creation of wildlife management in the United States. Species endangered by exploitation include bison. Today the bison " is once again abundant. CONTROLLED AS PESTS: Man has considered some wildlife species to be pests and has intentionally reduced their numbers. At times, it is necessary to reduce some wildlife populations to protect human beings or to permit other wildlife species to exist or increases where populations are low or endangered.- ALWAYS RARE: Some wildlife species always face extinction because they ,have a low reproductive rate and highly specialized habitat and food needs that restrict the species to a few isolated geographic areas. PESTICIDES: Misuse of certain chemicals has threatened some wildlife species with extinction. In some cases these chemicals were unintentionally introduced into the food chain. For example, DDT causes the shells of birds ' eggs 'to . become thin, and soft so that they broke, resulting in low reproduction rates . Among the species affected by pesticides are the peregrine falcon and bald eagle. ILLEGAL KILLING: Criminals with little regard for wildlife or the laws created to protect wildlife, do such killing. The alligator is one example of a species drastically reduced in past years by illegal killing for commercial reasons. Today the alligator is once again abundant thanks to wildlife management. • CA tii n : ' PROTECT WILDLIFE AND ITS HABITAT: It is our responsiblity to save existing habitat and develop new habitat. Support efforts to contain the expansion and pollution of our civilization. Encourage the wise use of our natural • resources. JOIN THE SPORT HUNTER IN REPORTING to your nearest wildlife agent, anyone who is. illegally killing or capturing wildlife. Be able to describe the person and the vehicle. Know th date, time, location and circumstances of the violation. BECOME INFORMED about wildlife and the organizations working in behalf- of- wildlife. Do not be misguided by organizations whose principles are based. on emotion ,rather than sound biological facts. SUPPORT THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF GAME BY purchasing hunting and fishing licenses. The fees from licenses and the special taxes on guns , ammunition and archeryequipment are used to manage all wildlife species. Hunting is a management tool- the most practical and least wasteful method of harvesting surplus wildlife populations, while providing food and recreation for man. Scientifically based sport hunting has never led to the extinction of a single species or caused any species to become endangered. Also revenue from the personlaized license plates sold at Depat. of MuLur 'Vehicles is used for tip;- mungi,mPni. of non-hunted wildlife. i • t t Ati- ill . t t I 9 1. - .1. .. ,,. . .„ ,.., • ,, ; ., _ • ...and what you can do to keep it What Ducks Unlimited is doing about it from happening again Ducks Unlimited is a non-profit organization of 1956 was a great year for wild ducks—with an North American sportsmen who have contrib- estimated 130,000,000 on the autumn flyways. uted over$88 million to date to create or restore i1962 was the most miserable year in recent almost 2,700,000 acres of prime wetlands in American history, with a duck population that fall Canada, encompassing 10,662 miles of produc- estimated at only 70,000,000. Remember? tive shoreline. What happened to reduce our wild duck sup- Biologists estimate that millions of additional 1ply by 60,000,000 in six short years? acres of habitat may be needed to stabilize this Here's what happened continent's waterfowl resource. This land may In the key duck pothole areas of Canada, no longer be available after the end of this dec- ade. Therefore, DU is engaged in an urgent race devastating drought set in. NOTE: Nearly 70% of all wild ducks on American flyways are against time. thatched in Canada. Here's where you come in 1 Duck production on the North American con- If you are in favor of this proven concept, then tinent is heavily dependent upon the number of it's up to you and other conservationists to make potholes with water in the prairie areas of Al- it a reality. Last year DU's more than 285,000 • ilberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. By July, members sent over$11.1 million to Canada. But 1962, they were dry as a bone. DU must raise at least 20% more each succeed- In a wet year from 6-8,000,000 potholes can ing year to meet the biological goals that have be expected—each averaging about two acres of been established. So send your check right now water. But in a dry year the number of potholes for$10 or more to Ducks Unlimited, Dept. DU2, with water can fall off to as low as 600,000. P.O. Box 66300, Chicago, Illinois 60666. Or this You can imagine what such a . ,.,..{,j,,a• . .�,. -.•-..,�, year, should you make it $15? ems,,;..,.. a �. • �4,.; {'•,^��r,a difference means to the propaga- `,,`u ;;"_' w ;` ' i;°.I i-.,.. ��tion of wild ducks. ceyen, ��,dYr��•,::,�, °."'•'���j�x, :�:�,�"�� `��`� ��' "? \,w to-�la:�t w t5.a'.-:0": ,.m`X'—k.'4. x I.,iv ,f.'s, x}4\• .',�'W`':.y+ T1, `'' "Ys'' • ♦♦��.�},,��+` a a rx,♦ '1 ..s•3 t:..x', r`y r '+e. a �d • C\ti '"'•1 � >fA _ \\y 41���q�T i"+ � A '�'� iD�-'i �'�' ��4� f R �J�'�" 4 Yam,,j n tS l 5 ,�•q`7,r,Ard f K z 4 rh• 4 .c .,, i e,rb ....y �\•�<�is SL\�'�iiil�\{(�k x�) i\e�y .4 F'� . t e i�`� P� 1.i�ab.�,i�'C� q'Y��'�•'' x N q 1 • �, �.ri- �'y ;: Z�{�"1 iiek �'\s��.:,h,. i� af.N;� � w.,. J" `' d s ' .�„� i.7Xa ���8.•e \ 4 f 't 6 1t q !w i At b; pt"�,i. t• r�r T. ( � ,� E p l'rG 4i r::* i ;Y t� v ,y '��`�7y,.�9 t: a M 2�9 T RM• ;,V11. a 1^ , "'+f... 4 J.. y- �e f�iYz�i'4�'\.:. b�,',a a�"V\ � tii C.�.�\�, �5 4y_ ,"1�� "� j�kq > i. L" r 'a y:g� t 4 ,• 4' i " i� ' ;4 �, ,,... .4. ,.L;4 rt ,,-' >t. F ii •n+X. ,tjf G}' U t ,..,,�."4.',�° w:.lti,,,,x V.(44'' ' 1 ,A.,,,,. W-ir'ki,.:1,!,,,ooliN:t.k.,go. Ail'4.:+,, ,... li•i_4''. . 1 '„.,..,:00q.',,i' Oro ql;;WPAV,O,t4, ilt, P y. L.r• • tiY'ffi � r ilVt•i c 34,..9.f "D..s, S�.C'1.'v"�.g Rev. 3/79 OF R.4,A t • �� o THE CITY OF RENTON 40 0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 ail CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9 • 235- 2550 Qo% o SEPSEt* -MEMO RA NDUM September 14, 1979 • • TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner . FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director (‘ �p, By : Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner RE: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES SPECIAL. .PERMIT, SP-402- 79 . The Planning Department is requesting a continuation of the public hearing concerning the Sea-Belle Properties : special permit , SP-402-79, to provide enough time to' evaluate input .from the Public Works Department and the State Department -of Ecology concerning wetlands designa- tion. At this time, the 'Public Works Department -has not completed their drainage analysis, and we have requested, but not received, criteria for determining,wetlands from Department of Ecology. It ' is requested that the hearing be continued until Tuesday, October 9th. RJB :wr• . cc : Paul Butrum, Sea-Belle Properties . Warren Gonnason, Public Works Director . Don Monaghan, Office Supervisor Mrs. .Clifford Hoof ' 'PLANNING DEPARTMENT '.P',RELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, File No : SP-402-79 SEPTEMBER• 11, 1979 PAGE TWO 2. Soils : Bellingham silt loam, less than 2% slopes (Bh) . Permeability is slow, runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight . 1. 714is, soilis used mostly for pasture and a few areas - - -----•--•----are--used for r 10.6rops': Kitsap silt loam, 8-15% slopes (KpC) . Runoff --is medium and .the erosion hazard is moderate to severe. This soil- is used for';;ti'mber and pasture. 3. Vegetation : Scrub grass is the dominant feature in the west and central portions of the property with some medium height shrubs and blackberries near the easterly extreme. Scattered Douglas Fir and some deciduous species are also present . 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: A spring is located in the northeasterly portion of Tract #182 , located immediately to the east of the site, flows in a southwesterly direction across the site. 6. Land Use : The subject site is vacant . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area east of FAT-405 is primarily undeveloped with the existing uses composed principally of single family dwellings. Grading is presently underway on a site to the east for a multiple family project and the property adjacent to the south of NE 44th is being filled from a recent Special Permit . To the west of the freeway the land uses are a mixture of industrial , commercial and some multiple family uses. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer : A 12" water main extends along Lake Washington Blvd. NE and 6" and 8" mains run east-west on NE 44th Street . A 12" sanitary sewer is located on NE 44th Street along the southerly border of the site. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #240 operates along Lake Washington Blvd. Northeast adjacent to the subject site . 4. Schools : Not Applicable . 5. Recreation Not Applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: • 1. Section 4-711, B-1, Business Use. 2 . Chapter 23, Mining.,, Excavation, and Grading. HI. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ,COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1. Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Reports , 1965 , Objectives , pages 17-18. I : IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems : Filling of the site will disturb soil and vegetation, increase storm water runoff and increase traffic and noise levels in the area on a temporary basis. However, RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT S E P 1 11979 AM PM PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 718,9,t0;11o12a,2,31415;fi PUBLIC HEARING I SEPTEMBER 11, 1979 APPLICANT: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES EXHIBIT NO J . FILE NUMBER: SP-402-79 ITEM NO. J, ,/0 2 -7 q A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks Special Permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 22 ,500 cubic yards. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: G. HARLAN LEWIS 2. Applicant : SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES 3. Location : North side of NE 44th Street along (Vicinity map attached) east edge of Lake Washington Blvd. NE 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5. Size of Property : ±3.07 acres 6. Access : Via Lake Washington Blvd. NE and NE 44th Street 7. Existing Zoning: B-1, Business Use 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: B-1, G-9600, Residential Single Family; minimum lot size 9,600 square feet ; RM-1800, High Density Multiple Family (King County Zoning) . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on August 31 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on August 31 , 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City .by Ordinance #1823 dated April 21, 1960. Tract #184 and- the South 160' feet of Tract #185 was rezoned from G-9600 to B-1 by Ordinance #2487 of July 18, 1969 and the remainder of Tract #185 was rezoned from G-9600 to B-1 by Ordinance #2592 of October 23 , 1970. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography : The existing site slopes from east to west with a slight slope to the north. A 24" culvert drains under Lake Washington Blvd. and I-405 to Lake Washington . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, FILE NO: SP-402-79 , SEPTEMBER 11 , 1979 PAGE FOUR M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the request for a special permit to fill and grade (SP-402-79) subject to the following conditions : 1. Department of Public Works approval of detailed fill and grading plans which shall include a plan for a temporary storm water retention system prior to the development of the site. 2. Approval of the site plan by the Hearing Examiner prior to issuance of a building permit , subject to the following general provisions : a. Reduction of development intensity in the northerly one-third of the site , and b. Provision of a heavy screen landscape buffer along the northerly and northeasterly property lines in order to provide an effective sight obscuring separating the business properties from the single family uses to the north and east . 3. Hydroseeding of the entire site immediately upon completion of the fill. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, FILE NO: SP-402-79 SEPTEMBER 11, 1979 PAGE THREE through proper development controls and procedures these impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment : The fill and grade permit ' will have no direct impact on employment . However, future use of the filled site will have to be addressed upon specific development . 3. Schools: Not Applicable. 4. Social : Not Applicable. ; 5. Traffic : Assuming 25 cubic yards per truckload, 22,500 yards would require 900 truckloads or 1800 total truck trips. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal. This negative declaration is further based on proper development procedures per City ordinances and the provision of suitable landscape areas to help reduce the loss of vegetation by site development . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division . 2. City of Renton Engineering. Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . - 4. City, of Renton Utilities Division , 5 . City of 'Renton Fire Department . L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1. The subject site is the lowest point in the general area. The development of the area will increase the runoff ; however, the construction of on-site storm water retention systems for each project will in actuality reduce the peak runoff . Both King County and the City of Renton require the retention of storm water runoff . In addition , some water will be stored in the ditch along Lake Washington Blvd. The specific storm water retention must be approved by the Department of Public Works. 2. The applicant has not stated the ultimate use of the proposed site, as required by RMC 4-2303(2)B; therefore, the site plans must be approved by the Hearing Examiner prior to issuance of a building permit . Since the site borders single family residential to the north, the intensity of the development should be reduced and buffered with landscaping. The community goals and objectives stated by the Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , on page 17, attempt to "prevent blight by protecting residential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolescence, and prevent the development of orderly growth patterns. " In addition it attempts to "protect property values within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners , through the effective control of land use. " 3. Since the existing vegetation on the site will be removed and no immediate use is contemplated, the exposed fill will probably create a serious erosion and siltation problem. The engineering drawings submitted in the application show the use of straw bales in the ditch to reduce siltation . However, the fill site will constantly provide a source of silt unless the fill is stabilized with vegetation . Comments of other departments are attached for consideration . , . Sga,...,••.4;17....7•••••••••••••••••................, , / 1 1 . • 711 , • " \ \ , -w-- , .-• ,,..a SII, ,q.,,-Litt.a,_ .•s..,. '''' . _• 1. 1! --•••• 31/ ' , •,'\\+, I r)„ 1------ , ,, ?,... \,.., A ti,. ,, L! II . I i ; _, '-z ''', D ,{Lii _) i r . • .0 g .4. IS, .so /,/ 11110-44•era....ar i 140 s„,,, . t• ; ...;/ 4( • '1 'ling. g,iii / , ....•eet• ............*., _ki • i "1 .8 • '''1 1 t/' 1 ! .1 5 Z_ •' 1 310 ,3; ,r ,. / / ;/ .\ . ,..., 0 _ . , ___. / , .„ ., . 11_1?) ... ,,,,,•,, ifft / .. 0 i / t i\ . -- / t # .. .. ...; ____s, . fir 47.0, ' 1 ./ 1 / , ,,,-• ..-----,i:"1 /Pt? Pi/ 'frA e'''',50Br. g. --,,‘-o. • / 1 hi ir" o• k i/p, // . /fr, IA ,ii„ ,,7510.- ,,, ,-4 tz '7' ,4 8 •'" ,'LE / • I 1."-'- //•/ A, 100% , /,,, , ,. . „ ,... .,.,.... . . - ,__ i ,••w 1///0-r," •. f. 1 % • :,,C.,,,-_42.f, . Id 1 ' i ,://// iri i. l'-'''' ' i' , .OP- ".• '-'''''''' - •. ,9 5.; ' . ii 1 i /: ft '1 1 1-.73 - • I 1 // P,a=a 1 / 1 I c'j-1-;-: 41. .--. --1-.--., ( I // k 1 d ' I ,..). , ..:-...,_...„)... ....4...2,.... /1), ' ,9 .. v j l --_1:!iiiL—, ,.-<, , 1 , ./ ,,,, ,,, , ...-'-----.__ L '"'"1 k __:;, , 1 i /, 1 / t .1 - 1 . . , i • / I 1 0 • ., , 1 1 /1 1 li, ( •! 3 1, 4 r 3 .i 4 . 1 ' • 1 '$ ' •\ • •t i I i I ! ' '•.\• 1 R e2•J"„„ ....., 1 , , i, • • • 1 . c., s • \ .,,, ... •0 1 1 i .,t1 i' _ . ! 7. e 1 \n— — . ,. , ......... . .43°.f • ....' ... .' It . I -/2,/ •',./ ''' ' 5 ' , %I..ik 0 5 1 ) 3 1 , ,''',:, -7:,,, ,,,c,,,:,; . .V, \' /p:,,,, ./7,„,/••—,_ I . , ;-•j1,...=;....,..., _1,:,-:_4TIFE.3:1____-., ::::-. _L__,--1 • . . i , 1 / .,,,,,,, _ ..e,..1. . , vt-o• _ ,ti .., , z ' . 1 I //,„ 8 7 0 5 -- A • . , 104 ',/d ''' ; —.til ' •"' .03 ,'.e fi G .96A2• 0 . . / . #: .1`, • •' _•'7 .L II I '-------, IVIL,13 -‘1-• — k • i' • ..0 8 • L 1 ' „ . ..' ii•'1' 22,..---....: 10.1.11 1 ....."1. It.:`.1 .‘,;:k .,,••''' ,. !,.. .t".......; : . 5.--,--7;-;---:-.---i--1 . - r I i i:,/ 4 4. a z L _ .... --,, ..• .1 . ... z ' tV I.Z til C.77.---.?7,-,•_°2-,..•, 7A, ' 11; ' ,__.,-.• .''`j' 11 NO _ ..'. . .-..,...7,-.- :—.7; . T1 iTiv!-ill-6 5:-1 .,s_ii ',_ , I- .• L - -------- 1 1,1/ ILL L. ,,,, I • - -,. 1 '8 - ..._, :2_. _.2.4 .,....,, 1,,,,,I.. -•,,,c,..z z=3=,, ,,r. .-..---.....---4_ ,\ . ___. ii i / ...f........,...m%.' ,;:, ..!_t*L__.` i'''L--.1 /- .44\— • 1 I, 1 , , , " • ., • .,•... . 9....1;!..t1-4 . ,.14.-4., •- -:--: L -=;x7 -- t/a.....,==2 Warm-a—a ar,...=,.;:..-;--. .. .. . .... ..... SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES SP-4 02-79 . _ li kf, APPL I CANT Sea-Be.11e Properties TOTAL AREA ±3,07 acres PRINCIPAL ACCE Via Lake Washington Blvd. NE and NE 44th Street SS t! EX1S1 1NG ZONING B-1 Business Use . I 1, Undeveloped EXISTING USE li I Fill and Grade of approximately 221500 cubic yards 1-)ROPOSLD USE 1 I I COMPREHENSIVE- LAND USE PLAN Commercial ________ F I ii COMMENTS !I . I! 1 ienton rlannIny Department DEV. PENT APPLICATION REVIEW _.EET Application : SPEC/AZ—. PERM/ � 'ter 0'�19 oP 'rcitete -Ce 94'01®712 0 Wa; gle/ fle Location : ,�. p ''N• Aft. deS Orr F 91I � • APP licant : c etA eve% ie, TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7/1/177 _ VPol ice. Department A, R, C. MEETING 0/ //7 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department COMEITI JOR SUGTNETIO'S R ARDDIP'�G THIS ASP �II ATTIION SHOULD PROVIDED ION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 11h3/4171AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE RL „ F JOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTTEN-D THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 PM ON 4V7p REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE Approved xxx Approved with conditions Not Approved 1) Entrance to the site should be off of Lake Washington Blvd. 2) Exit road from site be onto S.E . 76th. 3) Exit road be paved or of crushed rock construction for at least 100 feet so that the trucks will not track debri onto the roadway. 4) Area be signed with proper signs as required by traffic eng. 5) All roadways within the city used for the hauling operation be kept clean frode ri . —i 8/31/7 9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: - /—/; ' A c� Approved, ,/ Approved with conditions Not Approved /e 6 y'u//e l 7 , �� «�� C c,t S' 7/f.«c"7 - cf/---1 `--/o L CU/�L� ,��'��-�. ;���t��rrs / -/ OL c r��r�i�Y 7 / Signature of Director or Au. horized Representative Date / PROPOSED/FINAL eCLARATION OF SIGNIFICANC JON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SP-402-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-494-79 X FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks Special Permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 22 , 500 cubic yards . Proponent SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES Location of Proposal North side of NE 44th along east edge of Lake Wash. Blvd. NE Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non + Reasons for declaration of environmental/ significance : A declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal This negative declaration is further based on proper development procedure per City ordinances and-the provision of suitable landscape areas to help reduce the loss of vegetation by site development . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : (a) Reduction of development intensity in the northerly one-third of the site ; (b) Provision of a heavy screen landscape buffer along the northerly and northeasterly property lines in order to provide an effective sight obscur- ing separating the business properties from the single family uses to the north and east . Responsible Off ' fal GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title PLANNI G DIRECTOR) ,:' Date SEPTEMBER 5 , 1979 Signature '_/"c avi eme rs, enio anner, for City of Renton Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Department 5-76 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, File No: SP-402-79 - SEPTEMBER 11, 1979 PAGE TWO 2. Soils : Bellingham silt loam, less than 2% slopes (Bh) . Permeability is slow, runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight . This ,soil is used mostly for pasture and a few areas are used for row crops. Kitsap silt loam, 8-15% slopes (KpC) . Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is moderate to severe. This soil is used for timber and pasture. 3. Vegetation : Scrub grass is the dominant feature in the west and central portions of the property with some medium height shrubs and blackberries near the easterly extreme. Scattered Douglas Fir and some deciduous species are also present . 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: A spring is located in the northeasterly portion of Tract #182, located immediately to the east of the site, flows in a southwesterly direction across the site. 6. Land Use : The subject site is vacant . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area east of FAI-405 is primarily undeveloped with the existing uses composed principally of single family dwellings . Grading is presently underway on a site to the east for a multiple family project and the property adjacent to the south of NE 44th is being filled from a recent Special Permit . To the west of the freeway the land uses are a mixture of industrial, commercial and some multiple family uses. F% PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer : A 12" water main extends along Lake Washington Blvd. NE and 6" and 8" mains run east-west on NE 44th Street . A 12" sanitary sewer is located on NE 44th Street along the southerly border of the site . 2. Fire `Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per, ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #240 operates along Lake Washington Blvd. Northeast adjacent to the subject site. 4. Schools : Not Applicable. 5. Recreation : Not Applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-711 , B-1, Business Use . 2. Chapter 23, Mining, Excavation and Grading. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1. Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Reports, 1965 , Objectives , pages 17-18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems : Filling of the site will disturb soil and vegetation, increase storm water runoff and increase traffic and noise levels in the area on a temporary basis . However, • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 11, 1979 APPLICANT: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES FILE NUMBER: SP-402-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks Special Permit approval for fill and grade of approximately 22,500 cubic yards. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: G. HARLAN LEWIS 2. Applicant : SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES 3. Location : North side of NE 44th Street aloe (Vicinity map attached) east edge of Lake Washington Blvc NE 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5. Size of Property : ±3. 07 acres 6. Access : Via Lake Washington Blvd. NE and NE 44th Street 7. Existing Zoning: B-1, Business Use 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: B-1, G-9600, Residential Single Family; minimum l'ot size 9,600 square feet ; RM-1800, High Densit Multiple Family (King County Zoning) . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Noti was properly published in the Record Chronicle ,on August 31 , 19 and posted in three places on or near the site as 'required by City ordinance on August 31, 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1823 dated April 21 , 1960. Tract #184 and the South 160' feet of Tract #185 was rezoned from G-9600 to B-1 by Ordinance #2487 of July 18, 1969 and the remainder of Tract #185 was rezoned from G-9600 to B-1 by Ordinanc #2592 of October 23, 1970. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The existing site slopes from east to west with a slight slope to the north. A 24" culvert drains under Lake Washington Blvd. and I-405 to Lake Washington . r PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER (PUBLIC HEARING: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES , FILE NO: SP-402-79 SEPTEMBER 11 , 1979 PAGE FOUR X. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the request for a special permit to fill and grade (SP-402-79) subject to the following conditions : 1. Department of Public Works approval of detailed fill and grading plans which shall include a plan for a temporary storm water retention system prior to the development of the site. 2. Approval of the site plan by the Hearing Examiner prior to issuance of a building permit , subject to the following general provisions : a, Reduction of development intensity in the northerly one-third of the site , and b. Provision of a heavy screen landscape buffer along the northerly and northeasterly property lines in order to provide an effective sight obscuring separating the business properties from the single family uses to the north and east . 3. Hydroseeding of the entire site immediately upon completion of the fill. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES, FILE NO: SP-402-79 SEPTEMBER 11, 1979 PAGE THREE through proper development controls and procedures these impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment : The fill and grade permit will have no direct impact on employment . However, future use of the filled site will have to be addressed upon specific development . 3. Schools : Not Applicable. 4. Social : Not Applicable . 5. Traffic: Assuming 25 cubic yards per truckload, 22,500 yards would require 900 truckloads or 1800 total truck trips. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal. This negative declaration is further based on proper development procedures per City ordinances and the provision of suitable landscape areas to help reduce the loss of vegetation by site development . • K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5. City of Renton Fire Department . L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject site is the lowest point in the general area. The development of the area will increase the runoff ; however, the construction of on-site storm water retention systems for each project will in actuality reduce the peak runoff . Both King County and the City of Renton require the retention of storm water runoff . In addition , some water will be stored in the ditch along Lake Washington Blvd. The specific storm water retention must be approved by the Department of Public Works. 2. The applicant has not stated the ultimate use of the proposed site, as required by RMC 4-2303(2)B; therefore, the site plans must be approved by the Hearing Examiner prior to issuance of a building permit . Since the site borders single family residential to the north, the intensity of the development should be reduced and buffered with landscaping. The community goals and objectives stated by the Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , on page 17, attempt to "prevent blight by protecting residential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolescence, and prevent the development of orderly growth patterns . " In addition it attempts to "protect property values within the • community for the benefit of its residents and property owners , through the effective control of land use. " 3. Since the existing vegetation on the site will be removed and no immediate use is contemplated, the exposed fill will probably create a serious erosion and siltation problem. The engineering drawings submitted in the application show the use of straw bales in the ditch to reduce siltation. However, the fill site will constantly provide a source of silt unless the fill is stabilized with vegetation . Comments of other departments are attached for consideration. . I • 1 1 1 • , J-1 1�-1 , � . s L W, /0/ ui�I 1I ,1t 02 I , fyj.oa ( f' ,'fib9 �, �. rs 1 / R 4fit ' I, / / , ' 9 .\ ,., W A }i} y ". ' '..-"-I ' i ' i,„ ' A -, ' 114 al,0 ill • 1/4e„ / , .___\ 51— f � y a.^� t• r .9 p / ' I ( 4 // 1 //, / / // I J 9 oe =�a _ , , TT, , ...... .... 1 , ...... , \ ,..,,...:. ,I...-, 1 q '-�... • 5 Y 1 LLLU�U�U�!!! l j It'''""*-.'P t6' .65 , 'e b ib� N i50 49. 6'.4=,-ne-L', 1 (/ ,/ ; . ' / // i I, * '.. t i1 L • 5 II \ E y I� J r B 1 4. I' / /\ r1 2 ,�,13_� _ a , 1 , / / ,I t ;',I , ! , i.' . \ •0 9 i . . y 1 • , ,//' /04* !..1 i i a Pa d - -_�--.p2�- _ . I✓ =• Ii •t . 0 1 G y \\ - s • � - ] , { � r/, �� _ _101 .:e � .. i — q; - .,, c 11�-, y--,p_"--mac 82 '•9i _ _ ADO. _, .2. {I .s 9 2 ' 98 t' S 2 1 N I I // 1 79 f 4 � 12 � 97 ! . .z - _? .0 9 .� r I I 1 J 1 ,•////,/ )i .s1.Ao.,.1 L.,J o.n W1-'14.3 1 1 I —B9 �� - 1 - �N ' • , \. I /�/% S I a,,�.�eiel.• ,a1n'ul. nj,q..l..l..l...d II b9 `,�\ i --' , -if •8"' . b. nL L.' rrrriir 1I};r�,' l A III b' �� 6 .� _ ti t 1 SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES 1 . I SP-402-79 1 { k 1 A P P L 1 CANT Sea-Belle Properties TOTAL AREA ±3.07 acres t Via Lake Washington Blvd. NE and NE 44th Street PRINCIPAL ACCESS I E XI Si I NG ZONING B-1 Business Use EXISTING USE Undeveloped Fill and Grade of approximately 22,,500 cubic yards _ PROPOSED USE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial 1 1 COMMENTS 1 6 1 - - ---- 9 DEVE ?BENT APPLICATION REVIEW - • Application : 5 ECiAL— ;) eP r m960ap7 • Location : , $e � Righttligri 'five/ Nif IA •',;° S. aides OrNff912s Applicant :_Sect - m ietelt '.$ • • TO : Park§ Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 71/1/77 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING 3 " Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department IN�I�IRITI 6 FO QR R THE APLICATIONIREVIEW COV THIS FERENCEOr(ARC) TO E HELD ON HELD �( / ?� AT q.00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE F OUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO AATT�NpOTHHE AARRC. PLEASE PROVIDE' THE. COMMENTS TO THE FLANNING DEPARTMENT BY M ON /79 _ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE Approved xxx Approved with conditions Not Approved 1) Entrance to the site should be off of Lake Washington Blvd. 2) Exit road from site be onto S.E . 76th. 3) Exit road be paved or of crushed rock construction for at least 100 feet so that the trucks will not track debri onto the roadway. 4) Area be signed with proper signs as required by traffic eng. 5) All roadways within the city used for the hauling operation be kept clean f de •ri . Lt D°V PEsr`s8 ==- 8/31/79 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: - —// Approved ,/ Approved with conditions Not Ap proved f=// _ 3' t c-% i< I Signature of Director or Au, 'orized Representative Date li • PROPOSED/FINAL _ •1ARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE, N-SIGNIFICANCE • Application No . SP-402-79II PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-494-79 g FINAL Declaration Applicant seeks Special Permit approval for fill Description of proposal pp p pp and grade of approximately 22 ,500 cubic yards . Pjroponent SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES • Location of Proposal North side of NE 44th along east edge of Lake Wash. Blvd. NE`---- Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is • is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was m6e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . . non Reasons for declaration of environmental/ significance : IA declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal This negative declaration is further based on proper development procedure. per City ordinances and the provision of suitable landscape areas to help educe the loss of vegetation by site development . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : ' (a) Reduction of development intensity in the northerly one-third .of the site ; (b) Provision of a }ieavy screen landscape buffer along the northerly and northeasterly property lines in order to provide an effective sight obscur- ing separating the business properties from the single family Uses to the north and east . esponsible Off ' i-al GORDON� Y. ERICKSEN itle PLANNI G DIRECTA Date SEPTEMBER 5, 1979 ignature ;C/��t �h .C7/-(�.� : - avid . Clemens , Senio lanner , for City of Renton Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Department 5-76 I DEVE° "MENT APPLICATION REVIEW ET Application :5 E-cFAL_ P / ® p �°�� Orere3. 9601a7�� Location : _ f 'c� , e e_ etif.041,95,4511. Applicant • QP & III oer °„ TO Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 71/117, Police Department A, R, C. MEETING 8/3/177 • Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering 1 Building Division Ut : lities Engineering Fire Department 0 IT �GPF(S.�f�G NETARIBRIAIR JSCE ICCATTIIOPJ SHOULLD rpnl QED FERENCE (ARC) 10 BE HELD ON ? AT 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE RL „ F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 1 5: 0U PM ON `-- 0 79 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (/)(r, Approved X Approved with conditions Not ApprovedCL Signature of -Director or Authorized s Re reentati p ve Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • DEVE `TENT APPLICATION REVIEW ,ET Application : 5P6CtAL.— PCkAtlirr r F1911 EPerc de (se ® 9661n751 Location • °� d �° A ° P 7 wi' Applicant : Sedka. g404 j e er7eite TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7/11/7, _ Police Department A. R. C. MEETING /3/1/75" Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department ERITI IOGPFORGTHETAPLICATIO IREVIEW COVFERENCEOr(ARC)) TO BE HELDIOND AT 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE F OUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO AATTTENI� THEAR _RC, PL ASE PROVIDE THE- COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT UD PM A / 9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with conditions /Not Approved 4,(P7Y 106" 9/A0A? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved Signature of Directoror Authorized Representative Date I • DEVE 'MENT APPLICATION REVIEW Application : SPEC/AL P P i/TGr q` 'r c1. — 9&-1.7 71 • � 0 Location : , sP'h Lwa•.741Adiffea�i • ¢ tides e 'N Applicant • P '�e ��` • sew , hie t: ,e cdo..,0 T0 : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7//#77 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING /3//?5 Public Works Department E,pgineering Division 1 Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department COMI=NTs OR SI�GG ST ONS R C�AR]I G IS A�PI-ICA ON SHOULD3OVI DE INl M ITI IG FOR THE APLICAI ION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) E HELD BE �N �C 0 ?q AT g:oo AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE F OUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE W LL NOT BE ABLE TO AT N�GTHE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE WILL DEPARTMENT o/75 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : kApproved Approved with conditions Not Approved Jo/ Signature of Director or Authorized Re rese tali tive p Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved Sig tune of Directoror Authorized Representative Date PORT QUENDALL N 470 32'6" W 1220 12'13" September 5 , 1979 Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Blaylock : This letter confirms our conversation today pertaining to the grading permit application of Sea-Belle properties at the intersection of N. E. 44th and 1405 . Enclosed is a copy of a letter written on March 17 , 1975 as a condition of our approval of LID 291 , which illustrates our long-held concern of drainage in the sub-basin east of the applicant ' s property . You will note the entire 300-400 acre sub-basin drains into the 24" culvert shown in the drawings attached to the application. It is clear , based upon personal observations and studies of this area, that the present surface water drainage system of which this culvert is a critical part is inadequate. It is also clear that the applicant ' s property serves a vital function as a surge basin in the system and indeed is under water throughout most of the year. Removal of this surge basin will have major impacts up and down stream of the applicant ' s property. A finding that the environmental impacts of the proposal are in- significant would not be appropriate nor consistent with the facts . We have for many years urged the City to take the initiative for storm water planning in this critical inter- jurisdictional basin before construction work proceeds further this problem should be addressed . Sin. - , ely , "Of: Donald 0 . Norman DON/c s RECEIVED CITY Of RENTOIV OF R �`'� Rf�f F� HEARING EXAMINER [ cc : Warren Gonnason '/cc SEP111979 rCu O Enclosure AM pM SEP z 718,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,Fr ',III"' 6 �I9 ' EXHIB 6 \ 2G D ����� ITEM NO. �Sf Vo 2 - 7 ? E1)0( QUENDALL TERMINALS Post Office Box 477• Renton, Washington 98055• (206) 271-1540 44 gIVEI).vie . CEP . 6 1979 f � � . �I ------- -------- k' March 17 , 1975 The Honorable Avery Garrett , Mayor & Members of the City Council ( Municipal Building , 200 Mill Avenue South , Renton , Washington 98055 SUBJECT : Proposed Water LID 291 Jientlemen : - Confirming my conversation with the Director of Public Works. this ' morning , the three industrial property owners ; Barbee Mill Co . , Quendall Terminals , and J . H . Baxter Co. , support and will not protest LID 291 , subject to the following conditions which .we ' believe to be reasonable and in the interest of the community : 1 . That the designed fire flow of 6 ,000 gallons - per minute along the 12" run be *achieved be- - fore any assessments are levied. 2 . That procedures be adopted to determine a method and formula of benefits , if any , that would accrue to late-comer hook ups' • on properties_ or for services not now within the scope of this proposal , but which would • benefit from this proposal . The method would include provisions for appropriately assessing these late-comer fees and accordingly reduce the assessment balances of those that will be on . the. role as proposed . . In the event that one or 4 more property owners on the proposed LID role have paid in full their respective assessments , there will be included , provisions for making ' prompt cash payments to those same property . owners proportional to their share of the late-coiner charge,. 3. The May Creek drainage basin and a part) which was diverted by the construction of 1405 have in recent years been 'subjected to severe storm run-off problems . The proposed LID boundaries lie within 'the basin and diverted sub-basin . • , An effective building moratorium now exists in parts of the sub-basin for lack of utility services . The proposed LID will mitigate a 1 9 portion of this deficiency. Sewers are being proposed for both basins which once installed , - would lift the moratorium. Recognizing that fact , and due in large part to the recent drainage problems in the basin and subsequent . research conducted by the Corps , of Engineers , County Councilman Mooney proposed and the Council adopted a storm drainage ordinance #2281 . This ordinance recognizes the need "to protect property owners adjacent to developing land fromincreased run-off rates which could cause erosion of abutting property" . That • portion of the LID lying outside the city limits is subject to this ordinance. Due to extremely - fragile soil conditions i4tt these basins and the potential damage of uncontrolled development , we ask that the same protection be given those property owners within the .city. Thank you for your consideration . ' Sinqerely, D. 0. Norman DN/jm - cc: Alex Cugini R. L . Mossman • Warren Gonnason OF R4,4 �D r_ o THE CITY OF .7 ENTON U MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2flO MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,6'NASH.9.8055 o CHARLES J. DELAUR-NTI D MAYOR- --e PLANNING DEPARTMENT - 9,5 235- 2550 SE August 29 , 1979 . Sea-Belle Properties . 5542 Lake Washington Blvd . Kirkland , WA 98033 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN B�1 ZONE , File SP-403-79 ; property located immediately east of Lake Washington Blvd . between S . E . 76th St . and S . E . 80th St . Dear The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on August 16 , 1979 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for September 11 , 1979 at 9 : 00 a .m. . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon V. Ericksen Planning Director By: i l �' ---13(A4. R ee J . Blaylock ogy Associate Planner k cc : Bennett & Fox , Inc . P. 0 . Box 1031 Puyallup , WA 98371 !/// CITY ;fir REN!T ON APPLICATION FOR 7ECIPL PERMIT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY File No . SP- e/s6c1—'7/qDate Rec ' d. 04kf Application Fee $ / A13 �O�'� Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name Sea-Belle Properties Phone 827-0411 Address 5542 Lake Washington Blvd. , Kirkland, Washington 98033 2 . Property location Lake Washington Blvd. and S.E. 76th Street. , Renton, Washington 3 . Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) LOTS 184, 185 OF C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON DIVISION NO. 3. 4 . Number of acres or square feet 3.07 Present Zoning B-1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B . Parking , landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above . 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action • Remarks • • Planning Dept „ 1-77 -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including , , any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal) : THE SITE IS A LOWLAND AREA WITH SOME DECIDUOUS TREES AND BLACKBERRY BUSHES. • ' ' 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : . •JUNE, 19'85- 9. List of all permits , .licenses or government approvals required for the proposal ' (federal , state and local--including rezones) : , FIRE MARSHALL, BUILDING DIVISION, PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ENGINEERING • ' DIVISION, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, UTILITIES ENGINEERING, POLICE DEPARTMENT, ' ;v "j 10. Do' you have; any Plans for- future .additions',,;expansi"on„•��or':further: activity late •to:'or co cte •w th a. o os L es z ain �' 4•! f >i ^.r 6� *G 1dR +§ fi i } ".ii � �t, t :�;, ��_<' Yes, �fi- 1 �,w-i 11� bee to� ed� o ' '=,East •�at �1iat dates - � ' : .}._ � s . � 1 ,, x nd_: . the: ,. e,_ ..,,a,.r. '. a7::,. t': .• ..,• 'r .,-•,: ': ,;.,:.;:•.;',..; ':i., '!81'°'4 ,,Fi:-St•; Lf.,.�., ,F�v r g ''r i4': tF. t ,l' .r 6• °"x r {t' sl,.Y �`z •,z,;:, •��. � nt`d:Kin �"Cn' n � ''1 s ° ��:, Y, .'4�` �Y .�'� .i r x `f'-L s' .'3•� ih 3 .1 <Fs q, } t' i. rye, Jt,. - 'f� t%5i5', ��.,:a.�°Y!. _{.' �>',, :.��- . • :{ . `e en u 1�1• fo :an���undeter rinabl`e�;commer �ci` ac v= `t . • ;�a` :,,,.•, _:f:, ,fir:t - ?i': ` `,;l9':�S '.:1"': ,s'-,• ,,. t-. i:x^ x ter'' t. 6°, t'4: h 4: t r' '7 �a'-�a' t^�e `wh c-h� h o e. e`� o'., no �Q�f;`:aa` °T-an h �' t .a` �cov .o, :=D' ki ' .:,' ��`ii���? .�x:� ;;��..,a�,. `-1'�;,� -pa'�:"'u u k w. y'4 h y;, �:3, .�.. �ix;��A:, � :P p ,,++ v r.. 1;' ;a. ;,y. ,�,, ¢- 'a.-.•,-:,,y .v.,,,,'St� .'P.,r;,C,..Mx'r .�'[: �'''t `.>y,=`�;�- �.'.'!i .:is r'4i .; :,i: .`4 'irk,. V'. _ ::4'., :4#_5,.;.i. ..,'l.,:: .':,. •f,..'H �,)t` } }� •f: u • �/ e' 1:':i� tbi. `:a`' i.�l.'1 .f'�: r.. ,•r'' }# 'r3'=;:;'," ..!. ,J >.li�' .R t 't i s'i]'� �ry)1 ,t. :f: '!S:r ^jc .,t. ,f`�r ;t ;`!e': - �1' f t. rt• ��i�, F t.+, tt ,,i• Jt t,. ,1 - # O i ,rA Air :�t'i:'$K"T�:i"e t, _ 'f• pU; _ '3 Cy' a F t i% - .:�.�"< 1." . .2 nk 4 - °''� rX ,�tt ;�fr F" t } �� ,t,.tr.�;. :4: { ``}ea. r -t 6< "f~ 'hat ��, t. ..�; rh' �.a `tic Vim,:: ha' e`e' �- te' 'a. �`th' 'r �;�: �.• ,r..r.;, rAtach�,� `n =o e.rs,, �li.ca. n. ar.- t i, s:"'`b c e re` rdi'n e. .o� ;�.,LL• �.2`.�' ,a..Y;, _fr. .PR_, ,�►; ,.4 .p ., , 9 „9='+. , .p ... ,:w. "';-J 4S ,.�wy! -,''ti4p11:, jJ`51:w`'i1�' 4:. �, .,k , ..i.. .1 p k�r�.}'. ur.,'. �.._,;;, �fi•r�'; �ha° �m' a d� D t `is' ex' cued o��6es'-f• .1' ,a ..om :e'� ;���= ;.t,.: .'$tea:; o-at �e�if•�'none:. '•;be;enco l to �;'. u pe st i, ed�� ,ts e,�futur "'�.'^•',3.. r{','�.fy:. �i�v, •rr '$'1e:.;vi;,,F.^,,. _ t,F '1 {._'!r .#,...;4: .,Tµi ... I� i' = fit:• :`. �t �re. 'a' "h' .a 'i .'�. `d 'iD �.f:� uc a c`.,t. `n'<`f,o' F:��• ��: 3,. F �Qate esc' a:" h ':na' �+. b r'io: r�i .�:�; )ry l:, f-•- t t• .r 1 f "-4 y;r ieX t _i. :!:r - f:. =i .S`i.: ,i "i l - T4,.. •f' 'F'i ��t - II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ' ', °.,:',. - (Explanations of all :"yes;" ;and• ,'maybe."',an'swers''are required) (1) '' Earth'.' ' Will the proposal result' i n-:',,''r - , , ' , (a) Unstable earth conditions .or-in changes in geologic , ` • ' • substructures? • X Pam" MAYBE ice. • • (b) Disruptions, displacements:,, compaction 'or over- X . , . • - covering of the soil? , ' ES MAYBE NO • (c) Change in topography or ground .surfa,ce relief' _ , X - . . features? .. ' • ' Y1:5- HA1 B E (A� , (d) The destruction, 'covering°or;modification of 'any unique geologic or physical. featur•es? . . , MAYBE N ' ,•' • (e) . Any ,increase in •wind,,,or•water,erosion of soils;, ,' r .- , • either on or off' the site.: • ,;:' - _ -' X „ - '• " : ' '- YE MAYBE, .N.0, (f) Changes'.'in deposition 'or'e_rosion<'of',`beac.h' sands. -or' ,,:; • .. - changes in siltation', deposition or.' erosi;on•which . > may modify the channel.;'of: a';ri ve-r'',or stream:ar',the. • bed of.the ocean or any, bay; .inlet; or lake? X • Y7:�- MAYBE, A� Explanation: Project �will'' cover'over exi sti nq r soi l s'wi th a major change , • in- existing topography':'',".Change'of°evosi on;• siltation and ; sedimantation exists during; construction of fill`;' however . engineered systoms'.•for°'control:` of` these hazards will be ,. designed and i mpl;imented�;'during construction. •' • - _ • • CIT' qf WASHINU'i'G ENVIRONMATAL C SECKI LS ' 1 4PS Ig4> FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application ^'e. ` ! - � - / f • Environments. Checklist No. _9i1 y '7 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: 0Declarati nof Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-µignificanca D Declaration o Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires • all state arid local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing prvate ,proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is ho •help the agencies ,iryvolved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. ; Please answer the follrwing questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where -explanations of ,your;answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be:: helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, :ruse additions:". pages if necessary. You should include references to e;ny reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers ;to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposel, to undertake . the required environmental review with- out unneces:?,ary delay. The‘ following question:l apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently appl„ing or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should incl ode the impacts which will be caused by your,,proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur-until sometime, in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete,their environmental review now, with- duplicaing paperwork in the `uture. NOTE : This is a stand:;rd form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for vari'+us types of proposals. - Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does' not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next questicr, • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM BACKG`-OUMD • 1. same of Proponent Seabelle Properties 2. Address and phone number Of 'Proponent: Bennett and Fox, Inc. — Contact- Debbie Flyg • 72O East• Main • .?uyal i up, Wa„ 98371 • 3. gate Checklist submitted 4; Aeoncy requiring Checklist BUILDING•DIVISION 5. rlame of proposal , if applicable: • b. Nature and .,)rie description of the proposal (including but noz limited to its size, gene.rel design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate • : nderstandir{g of its scope:•and nature) :;'. ' The proposal consist of filling approximately •3.d7 acres In order to do this fill it is' necessary to redesign one . • ditch and to design another ditch- to intercept off-site flow, Once filled the'"si:te will have, a gentle slope towards northwest • • a:.:. b 7t .r1# -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or,:, numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish,'benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X YET- MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE N0 ' (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement X • of fauna? YES! MAYBE NO (d') Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? NO Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Ambient noise level will increase during construction, . but will quickly return to 'normal levels upon completion. (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBE' 10— • Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration. of the present or planned land use of an area? y MAYBE r. • Explanation: Presently undeveloped area will be developed with ' current zoning regulations. (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal ' result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YET- Ufa"BE NO ' '(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES" MAYBE WU— ' Explanation: j (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal _involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, . but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of .an accident or 'upset conditions?. , xx Y€ MAYBE NO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal •alter the location,, distri bution, density,' or growth rate of- the ,human_,population • ' , • •of an areal X{X Explanation: ; • . ------ . . • , ,,- ' ' . % , , • „.-.- . . . . . .. . . . , . . ' „ • ..„, . . (2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in: : ' , --, . . (a) Air emissions or. deterioration of ambient air . ' , , • quality? 1- X i . TM' MR" Fil5- . , (b) The creation of objectionable odors? yrs— MAYBE RIS- ' ,, .. . .,• i H Cc) Alteration of air movement, moistUre or temperature; -, or any change in climate, either locally or ' regionally? V X ' -- - V ••: TETT MAYBE TO- , • EX"Planation: • ' ' . , . . • , . • . . 4 i , 4 .. 4 • . „ . • . • . . . • „ . •• • 4 I ' ' • . 4 '1 ''' '4 . '' • 4 4 4 .(3) Water. Will the proposal result in: . . .. - _ (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of , • _ water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YET- RUE iii-: .. ' , . .. . .. . . ' . (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or , , • -. ' the rate and amount of surface water rUrioff? " • : * X- Yff- FATOT WU— , . i , . . • (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? ' . r X . . - ... • -'''', - ' '' :'.'' f' :- ' , , • YES MAYBE , PTO:: 0 . (d) Change in the amount of surface 'water",in'any water ' 1 • body? . . • V X : . ' - . • VET- MAYBE tir : • . . „ . (e) , Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration- -' -' ')., • ' ''' .'' surface water quality, including but not limited to , , ' . , " temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?',: X „ ' V : .: , • :.-.: '. YtV MAYBE NT- , .. , .. (f) Alteration of the direction or rate„of'flow,of .. . ground waters? - . -. TC75-7 MAYBE pi-o-- . . ... . . . (g) Change in the quantity.of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals ,Tor through " • . ' " '- '° '' ''Interception of an aquifer by cuts-....or excavation's? '• X YES MAYBE NO ;: , , •• , • • , , . . , . ' • (h) Deterioration' in groond 'water quality, ei ther through ' ' - . . , ' • . direct injection, or through.the.seepage of Cleachate, • , . • '''" '' ' ' phosphates, detergents , waterborne' %ii rut or bacteria, . • , or other substances into the ground waters? , . ' - , . • -- YET- MAYBE [0,-,. . • -, ,••:, : ,- :, -,. :;','',-.,' -: ''- ' .... (1),,,:BedUction in the amount of water ,otherwise -available for public water supplies? , .-' ,-,,,,,,";,;-;.`. ,-:--:..- : . ' . •:• .c.. ; ; :;--. YET- X MA1BE NIT-. . . . • •,.,,.".];•.'`2... ix-Planation: Minor changes in, existing .drainage pattern wt_ll he engineered , ''', • •:. . . , ., ' 2-,•',.,..,'• 4••,' .' '.. ' on site 'System will be designed to accomodate any abnormal flows • '; which might come on •site.--::'-'- '----:', .'“:-. '„•'•::: . ''''' ".:. ' '' -' : '':' : ' ' • - ' - ; - . , . . (4)- Flora. ' Will the proposal result- in:-.T.,..N-,-.,,,,,. c,, ;,6-_,, ,, . — , • ' .•,, , :„_, ' , - ; ., ,,,:.- •. : : H., - ., , :. '. :::',',":::5/. .;"'''''. :','. ; ' . (a) Change in the "diversity of 'species,c -• or numbers of any , •, , • ,•. . . : ',-..• '.• : :' . - _ !' :. species of flora '(including.i.treet,;;;:.-shrubS.,• grass, crops, . - . .,'. • • ,, lei grafi ora and aquatic plants)?- •'-•`.' -..' ,. -'...---•.;J :•,•%;,'.. r.'" : - - - ' - ' ';- '.• ,',•"; ' ' : -.,: . - - . - ,- -,:•:;',,-. ' .. --...,-.';;:-j-;".-.-;;"...7::--'1;:::•'.''.1'. ",,-," " ' X Trr MAYBE Fr: • , . , :: . •,.. ,, •r -! : ;' 2'• . ' . " ' ', ' . ." - '.!'. •, '.':r '•:.:i.;, i'°'-,•:..,:r,l'., r`.'.71.:' ',.r.',.',!li,'",'' " . •. ' ' . r"• - :• ... ' :r. r•''..'..' ' :', r ' .-: (b) , Reduction of the"-numberi':of;any„Uni,qUe,',:!‘rare''''or -.: ;,.. ...‹. ' - , • • :•', - - :: ...i,.- i:.;•-:: 1 ,, , endangered• species of flora? : .... -v,' ',';.,'-'f:1-.-: '';':- - XVW MAYBE 1i — • .:,., „ ; " • , , . _ (c) Introduction of new species of,,..fl Ora :into an area, or - , ," ' •-.-: . , -'• ' '''-` :--', ' ' ';'---,',. ;. ',' ' :',• -. in. a barrier to the rl9r'n411 .'!.-i7ePlerliSNment...9f-,•eic140n9 : X '. i : -- . -•,.: ,:., : ' species? -, ::,•.,";„ : ,..','„ .-'•-':. ,,,,:,',;:,)"-- „:,1,- , ir.•!-_:?,:, 4;: ., , c, ,:•,,-,' , :, , ' ' ' : , „ *:; , :,.ii ' ',' '-- ,;, . : - :,:3: , ''.' -;:-,-.; • ',,,,-•:'; ',:.,'' ''' '''',`-;:';;;,,-,:):,.:':;',',...•••k•`-/,';' ,,i;;;;;-, -",,',_',' . -',.,:,,E'-'''. "--,'Mr MAY BE gr -,,' • • -,', ':'''"' ",;,':..' ',..,;.:,, ', '' .'' ,' . -,,,. ' - . :,. . •.-: -: '.', ,;-,-,.;,•':".;.-,'•:.:,,.'',:,,,k‘. ','-':',„:.--'•-' ' '-',.;.:''-: ,,,.Th :: : x' • S , ' (d) Reduction ''l ii: acreage. Of any agricultural' ' 'crop? . -• :-.-,:. - • .. . -• ',,,. .• • ': .....," : ,•`:,- ,..- : ; -- , - ,...... -. -i !.' .•...•.'. ..-:;.: ....-.,-,,, ..:';-, 4, .,,,,,,,..: ,•.•••'!,...,-',',.,-; ,,••.-•, ,,,,„•„..,;;,.... . .,. TET-7- MAYBE .;, Tr, .• , r .:., . :„•,....i ; ,,.. . :, -;,; : ., , •. , - , . .., , ., -.;, ,,,, ,..„,;,,, ;,-. ...,-,;,,,..,:.,:,•_ ,-',;:: -;.; ,...,,, -•-•-;,c.;: ',. ', ,-.-.1 Y.,!...;• 1 .-,.......“,.,;.•.; .. .•••,.. -, : --::,--, - .'. ..• . .;,-• — ,,, •,:r..:, -; — - ' _ • ' ' '' — •••.' :-,•'.,••,----- '•,•:,,''''' '•' -,n''' • '"-•:',, ;:•-, : in'.' ',:. " ", ', -,.• " ' a‘.. ' i r..1,;• :. :•—..:- • . Explanation: Will remove eXjSting- vegefa`tihn."-, i amd srap7 no n.f site rRy : , , . ;','• -- :.". if-, , , ' introduce new species. , '-. .'".' . ,'.-'-: '-:[...-' •:, • , - ,...,. -P ',; .• '- :-,' -,---' -,' :.; : -. -.:, '-'...:-.:: :...;,-..',• :,4,; ;;--,.;•,,..':.;2:-, •,,•',--ii1;.:,;, .-.--:.:.;;; .,,..,.-..,-',...• - :: ,J, : ,, , ' '.1 •-• ••'. ' ''...r.'. -" ' • . ' '' ' '''."''''''' . . '' ':'''. ' ' .''-': ''' •' -,••:.:,;•:' "."4::'l'.;;•':,:;• '2,::::': i.' •,•-•:2.q.'; •:-., ' ••'; ' •;.:- " ' ,: , '' ' -,'" ' :1:: ,:-,' : ': '•••;,, ' :;;;" , ' - '. ' " " ''''' . ' ' ,:-.•'.''::: -.:-',2.•.;, '!" ';'••',.'''';•73';'.••-•':'' '.;.I.P`•;:'•''.',.:1:`.:, ' :, %I.:,.., ',' „ . .•:, ",,,,•:,:., ' 1 , •:::,.. ; ,,, ,' '''' : ,• :,,:-1,',;. ,; :',... ..-::'••':-,'-'•••'1,0;;:•'•'; ';'',',F.7''''.1 ';‘,- ',.''',i,•'•".•' ',r ' •:-.•.,•„•:,`,..••,''' , • _ , -.'". , .... , . . • ., . •", , , ., , Nk. '-';', -.i, ,'':',.•!:?,,-';- -'. : ,'', '., "-. '''' ..' • .' ' ''''. . • '.:''•: • ' ''•'?'''' '' 'T.if'7','",','': ''''-' %•.;,•“At-•• :;,',,'':1•.'. '•'''. ; ',," '',':, ••:. ';••: ' - ' • ..,, , ., • , •:,.!, • • , 2 ' • - • •.' '•,• ,, ' ',•_-•:', ',."•••"'•"-?•:,1-'-',• ',..•'+:4:!•':1'.;•,•••.';', .z',' •-•.:- '', .., ':•,'t,,4"-'• ,. ' " '• , !•,4 ..„ „, -, ,...,','•"' • ,-., • , „ -- . . .re _ . , .. . .. . '.,,,:,'"---.1;•;,,..'''. • . . . . . . ' .. . . ... . • , ,. . , . . . . . -6- . , . . . . . . . . „. • , . . . • ' : . . • ' . .. . . ,.. , ,.. (d) Sewer X, or septic tanks? . . , . • . YET- ' RATITE !TV' f ., • • . . . , . • (e) Storm water drainage? • . X . • . ' vrr RA1111- gr . • . , . . ., . , . • . , • . . (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . .. , .. , , MAYBE NO , '. . • . ' H-.. ' . . . • . . . . .. . . Explanation: Eventual developement will require minor extention of existing . , ' . - .. . utility system.. . . . ... . . . . . . . ..„,, . , . . • . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . • , • . . , , . i.' ,-„. „ . . . • • . . . . , ! .. .. .. . - ..'. (17) _ Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of ! :,.. • , any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding .. . mental health)? . ; VT MAYBE,g- , AY- • . , L... .. . ; • . . . , • • ,, . .t . „. . , • . , „. . • . . • . , ....., . , , . - , .. ,,' , ., . , . .... . ., , Explanation: , . • 1 •••-`.• , . ,. , . . . ' • . , . . , . . . . , „. , . • , ..., . . . . . , • , . . . , . . ,, • . ... ' . ... . ... ] . • • , , , . (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal resultin -lHe obstruction of .. . , : • ' -, 7 , inTaiiill vista or view open to the public, or will the • . „ . . . , ' proposal result in the creation.- of an ,,aesthetically -offensive, '• , . . . , . , -:' •• -.•- - site -open to public view? • -- :•-••• ...., - ,.....•!,...'..-.. .- .... ,,, , . - .. • • ' X'-•'-' ‘'' - : - ' ' - • .. . , ., .".."--- ''.'''. , ' '' .., . . "• • ' H-i ..',......,, - •-• -....• . ,• Trr-,, sAvi-TE: . RIF- . - . .. ...". ..., -..,. • . .:. ...., . . Explanation: • • , ,.. . . _,. . . . , . . .. , - ...,. .,•,... , , . , .. fl 1,- •.• .. • . • 4.,, ..., . . : .- - .,, . • , . , . .; ,. . ,, . , . •••• . .... . , . .„ .. .. . . .., ,, .. . . . .. " •,, , .., „ , .. . ,. ,... . . • „ .,. • . ... ,. • • 'A,- '•_‘:•.'. , • • '-'' .ii '. -.• ;., • . ': . ' ' • . , , , . ''''.1.- ''' • • --;',' 119) . ,Recreation'. Will...the proposal result In an Impact upon the ' .quaiity 9r.. quOntly 9f existing recreational opportoniti.es V!T,,,. • , '..-•mAYB ,,,,,,,,.4)6_,2,.,..: . , . . . L-:: • ''''' '' . ', •• • 'Explanation: . . . . C,..-, -- • • • .-.."„•- ' . . .„ ' . ' . . , . .. . • ..- . . , ,. " • - ' ' ' — . . . . „ , r .. • -, •,` , • •r . . ., . . 1 . •,. t,• ' ' i t -''. . , • bq''' . .' • ': '' '-t'• • . . -. . . ,, . - r . „, . . . .'.'• 'I, .7, +., (20) r Archeological_fHistorical . ..,Will the ,propps,.al,"..i'resul.t.in.,en ., .,,, , • ,r. ,,:,,.-.,..,.,:•, , •,, , , ,i,.,- • ,•.: 1. r:-. .-.•;','.- alteration'of' a significant archeologica! :,pr. nistori,cai . .,, site, structure, object or building? : .;;',,,Ii......`• . .1, „ '•. . • .. _. •;',..; !, ... -'•, .''',:,.. ' , .., MAYBE NO .. .. ''',;f•I';-;" '• ''''" ' • , •••;",•,, - '.•:'''''''' •••'-;'•-• ' . ' ' • • • •• _-' '-,,- ',••:,..,:•:.',.' '-:,•'',:_.:,',-;,•-;;;7.•,•,,,:•'•.- ',,, -,.,,,,,,,i;-, ri, ,,,,.....•.: , -.,:: . ,.., . 5•-•! • -. " •• ' • • '.••,-Explanation: , • . • . - .' '-',- • : • --.. .1 • • --.":. ' . -, • "'•:.' ',.,' ';',"-':',•-; /.',:.--"...,`,--,.,:,, r•,',,....,'' - :-.--"''' .-: '...-:-.; '''', ...,'', - -,-1••' • . '',..-: ::•'''''' . • "' " ' - - (II'.'• " - .. „,-,....... • • , • -,-A • • • „ 11,-. "'' . ' .:;,. ..;•-1/4."::P.,!..:•••,..--',; ''-''_•••''' . .. ,' '"'.-...' .','''' ' ' ....• '.'',.--f-•-rr: .!-"'",''' ', -'' '• • .-'''''' -." '-'''' • '' , :,:, , .„ , ' .',410:,.'if, ;,. . ,. ' . -, ;,:-;;,',..,'•!,..'; , ,.•,,,--;•.,,,, :,-•, .,.-,-;: •-•„-... -- : ....,,..• •.•.. ,. : •,..-,;,,,,,,;--,..-;:e...-,,:,.".;',.!f•_:,. --;;',....j.'"„:',.,-,;,',-,'";:.;-..-,, ,i'''..'-'": ;':',.....''-:•:-:•...2:::::: '''' : - ' '.:-'•:,.:'1,•••••...;•.''''''' :'-',''' '' ... '. W'',Q, :-- •• • :•H.' '''.: -: '''-':`, :. '', ''''. ::', '0•'' ; "7:: "'•'''•:•1:: :•':.•-'-:',',.-'"::';',';.,,,, ,:i' i:1:-';.,'n':.q11..'''..1:51'T...:L;-"': ' ..'-C . '4,' '• , • '.:, •:-:'.-;'' :.: :J,••'., '..'''..,-, '• ':*-'-.'r'.' '.,'Y . ..'.%;'':'-',:,4''''',..;,',':::','T‘i'i;'::"':'..-;:':' .'''''Z". '''' ' ':::;. ;''''.'' .. .. '' ' III. . S/GNAtURk::::. .' . .'.'' ' . ., ' J'; '. . ' ' r: '3..:'':.'.1H):::1';:[''', ...",::!.:,..".f:.:1',:',::''':''1,': ,ii.,',:2'' . ' ':' ' • '' . .r,. ,,!fr., , .• ' . ' 1 , the--,Undersig'ne d. .state,',•that'i'O':.:the,'„'best.-:'of:MY'..kn'oWl'idge'-the above Information '1...,,,'?„-• •. '',' ,', • IS-true and complete. '-' It. is understood ,that'.,the-.1ead.agen9Y 'may .',M1.4`i_i.--,',-':,'•-„-•..-.-.'i:'.;.... -:',:,:.-,.Y;' .,' , • . ,.., :• withdraw I„.•?, .. decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue In reliance upon this checklistsoud 1 - there be anyw1llful miSrepresentatipnJor-willful •1ac ( 9f-fY!). alC1? ure on"mVeart* ',--,'',--,'.,' .,:, •--.. ,-;:'.. ' ' • .:•••••;i:',-.;•.,,.:...•-•' , ',..:7',.., .-.',.?....,....,."nr,,, .:i'fi'.,•.,,:".;r,•',..i;,_:,..' ,-:-,., . •.,;,,2...,:: -- ,,'- ' ' • . '.' :,,,, .;..' -:, ; :,...,,, „.. .,,. •,, . ..i . .. . .r..." '- ' .,' ''.. - :.'••• -•. -•'. '• ,.•,• -. •':*,--" .L'-'....... .: -.....-.:-• Proponent- - • ..-...f. ''''t o .,.. .„ ...iA . .„ . ..,. . . . _„ • . ., , . ..• • .. .....„.,. .. ...: „,...,. ,,.... ., ., „ ..e . 41 ... -,.',. .,:. ......•..:‘, ....,' ..., .• ...,., •,,. .,, '.... . ,,.'..z.,,.,:,.:::,,:,..:,..,',. :.,.... :.:-',....,-....f.:,...,.".:; 'k,.......... ',-- ; grieci)....,..:‘,.:-.-.,,... ,!:,,,-;,:,: -. .. , -, .,..,•,, -,,-,::, ,,... ...,.. . . • . . . , . ile:-.':,..-1" ,, '.1 :.,,.::: ,';!;-,,',.;'•,`:',:„, :•'.1:,::',:....'::,';'-';':;••• , ',',...,':,-.:,.... ...-..,....: '':,:'..."-'..."-::',,;:.:'.:•'-'-)'.;.',„.-'''-;.. .:...i' ...,,,::. .. ...,-. 1,:i...''''..:be'ii tie,'-'':‘ . El ,,,,,,.,,i, ,•: , . , ....,. .:',•,-.'.,:.;L:,.. „ -,. ., .::::,.....:!,.:,.,..,,s..,. lname,•;printed) --,'-'. :..':••';':•,'44:- -..,•-:,'H'.:',",•'•,--';'..`"' ' •' ' „' • •,:.; ; , ,... .. :,• •.... ..•. . •. •..:',.. ,,,, '. ,,i.':.- '" •,:''-, ,.:,.. ,•• -'''..--:-:. .-:-....',1,-;.":'",,,'„• :';',-).- -,...;;:',./.','', ,...:'...:'-',:.-•'.?•,;-•,,,,, i';',..,,-,.'...i ''..:' • • .,'' - • .."-. - • - - • .• ':•-•,- . _ ' ',"•••'., ,•-• 1 • -• • ' ,-."..., '. ;''',..,-. -,-",,1-•-•r;P:::::;_:,'..-.,', ..f..',..;"•'''''',.,-..•••'..-,"".`,...-'",•:....., '," ;,•-•• ''••• - •• - ' ' - --/ ',"` ''-' •,, . , • r.;,. . ..' • :. • '', .;:ii...:,,• .,.. . - '''--- :.,-,..' -"..., ,.:',1, ','':,,... - '' :''.3'•-••...--,..v.ri..:7-,';',-7.-•-"..--::•-•••:."-".q..,'...,, -,,,,,,:, ..,--•,;-7.'„-,,,;."--,,•';',...;•r, -•-••;•-• -• •- • • ' ,,.,".,,,",-,:'„,-,,,,•••• ''. • •• , - ,i .. .. , ,-.• .-; • . • ':', ".:..:.' , • ..'.. ,...;-,!.'....,r,„;;;?,,..;!.;..,,,...,,ze;;;..,,•;:tri,„1. ,,,,..;.=i ..,,,,,••.;••-•,: .,::‘,- --•--.:.:::. ..,• -' ' ' ,.: - ,-. • , - :; . . . • • ''' • ': -- •;". '•••• ' •`.-:- ':. •• •' ' •••' •. 7-•'' - i','•',1•••S--'-• -`,-'••:',',W.. '',•`':'•_'•-,' ,,,••,;-."-'City of ,Renton ":'-'.. ., • : . . .„."-•°...-,,,,' " ..., ', ....•:. ‘•,.. i''' ,.... ,; '' ..- -f."!' .- -,..,,,."-.:.. --„;'•;;,...',. .; -,,,, '," ', ' ' Plapning Department - .; . . ' • .• - '' • :,• ", '..-," , - .: •'... - ,.'..-L...=,'..:'-'''.,'''.,,,;',',,,',;,..,,,...--7-.1 . . .-:',. ...,:-, .':,-- '`...1„.."- J,:.'''.. '; •il",-1 ._ , ';',\:;!, ; . . ..; ., „,,,,, . ; .,,,..... .,..,...• . - . ,.. . ., -2.: ',•:' ...,,,,•,-"-,-. .,',?.,,I.,. '''''.'j.-'',''',. ''•'-• -."--i.", '.. - ' ' ''. - ' li': '''' ''- ' ••••• . ' •:.. , !•,, ,; , - -., . . . . - . , .._ . . . .. • ,...... . , • . - • ,'. , ' - .;-•: :,'". : .., .• .. - ..,,,...,, ....:...,',''... -,frf::',..1.•1•4••;,''.••-,',•'-'2,••••••, - •••••;:i-, : '-•. ••• . •" - • •' ,. ' ..• ' . ,, • • :-', • • , •,.- - . , . • •-.., '..• 9 -5- ' • • ' •• (12) Mousing.. Will the •proposal affect existing housing. or,": X • create a "demandfor,additional housing?' • - , , YES N YB Nam' Explanation: l� ; ' (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result In - ',; '., X (a) Generation':of additional vehicular mDvementj ' ' ,' vrr MAYBE. N Q (b) Effects on:existing parking facilities, or demand j : ! 1 for new parking? . PEf` MAYBE ii • . X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?_ YES" i " (d) Alterations to present patterns of: circulat'on or'! •X ' ' ' movement of people and/or goods?' MAYBE Abe , - - (e) Alterations to waterborne. rail or leir'.treff.ic? ' X fir— MAYBE . ib-'. : ' • ' , (f) Increase in traffic hazards to' motor vehicles, X, ; bicyclists or pedestrians?' i y-43'- MAYBE 1 • , ' Explana'tion. ' " "Eventual commercial'''developement may. generate increased : . ., ;. ' ,. ` . traffic. '• P • (14) - Public Services, Will 'the' proposal have an effect upon. or ,', result in a -need'for new -or altered governmental services, ' in any of the foll.owing' areas • 4. - (a)• Fire protection? (b) Police protection? X - 'Y . FiAlTE N (c) Schools? : YES MAYBE• WC' _ ' (d) Parks or other recreational faci,l':iti,ejs? : `_ ' • . X.':.. ' . .., . . YES'' •M ` N O • (e) .:Maintenance_ of"public- facilities'',;, :'in'cl,uding ,roads? . . YES MAYBE •N0.- ". (f) Other governmental services? ' 7 M�YbE Nj1 . - . Explanation Eventual_developement'`may :increase' coverage area for fire ' .and Police 'protection. ., Energy..,, Wil'l .theproposal '.result •ip ";;'Y <„',: (a) .Use of substantial amounts .of. fuel or `energy• _ _B� : (b) Demand upon existing` sources'.of energy. or::requi;re : • ; the development of:'new, sources of energy? ., .' X ' YES MAYBE Fr-, •.- Explanation. ,'F, .:, , , ' • ' ' -(16)' " Utilities': •• Wi1.1 ',the'.proposal' 'result'in: a"'need 'for'new, - systems,' or alterations. to'-the:,',following::utilities::` .,:::-• :$•,• '. • .gas? ,:; ,. owes or natural" L, ,k ; X MAYBE' b) communications..systems?` ;,` .a; • „ • s'. •a: .,YES (c) Water? •;, 'r.-` ,;' — , t SYES MAYBE .NO.'• .. a • air CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY File No . SP- Date Rec' d. Application Fee $ Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name Sea-Belle Properties Phone 827-0411 Address 5542 Lake Washington Blvd. , Kirkland, Washington 98033 2 . Property location Lake Washington Blvd. and S.E. 76th Street. , Renton, Washington 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) LOTS 1884', 185 OF C. D. HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON DIVISION NO. 3. 4 . Number of acres or square feet 3.07 Present Zoning 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (incluude setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. 1-77 FORM #151 BUILDING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON APPLICATION FOR GRADING LICENSE TO BE FILLED OUT IN DETAIL BY APPLICANT OR LICENSE CANNOT BE ISSUED Owner: SHORE VIEW DEVELOPMENT, iNr., JOB Address LAKE WASH.RI VD. AND S.F. 7FkTH ST_ Address: 37:1.1 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. Legal: LOTS 184, 185 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 HILLM,ANS LAKE WASHINGTON Telephone: 827-0411 DIVISION NO. 3 Cubic Yards Involved 22,500 Estimated Value of Work $ 30,000 Description of Work THE PROPOSAL CONSISTS OF FILLING APPROXIMATELY 3. U7ACRES. IN ORDER TO DO THIS FILL IT IS NECESSARY TO REDESIGN ONE DITCH AND TO DESIGN ANOTHER DITCH TO INTERCEPT OFF—SITE FLOW. Contractor: State License No. . Address: Renton Bus . Lic. No. Telephone • Civil Engineer: CHARLES R. BENNETT Starting Date AUGUST 1979 Address: 720 EAST MAIN, PUYALLUP, WA 98371 Completion Date JUNF 1985 Telephone: 838-3474 • (1) This application dues not constitute a license to work. Work is nut to commence until grading license is posted on premises where work is to be performed. (2) Certification is hereby rendered that no work is to be done ex'_ept as described and that all work shall conf,srm to he applicable codes . 3; W.,rk in puLl. i right- . i_ °�.y an ' easements is. not authorized 4:•ider this pplicati'Jr u.u¢A 1MiS"\t �Y:. -.-. . . n: .n w�..•� m..,.. ..,�—....��..i.. ..:� •�.+ems w. •.. e ' AFFIDAVIT I , G. Harlan Lewis , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge 'and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this anay of , 19 7 1 , Notary Public in and for the State of SHOREVIEW D LOPMENT NC. Washington, residing atc2---- -,Mik_ Name o Ty Publi ) natur Owner 77 41 Z-j 3711. Lake Washington Blvd. ".E. , (Address,) .1,,eizie �/ (Address) Kirkland Washington (City) (State) 827-0411 (Telephone) • • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) . CERTIFICATION ' This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By : Renton Planning Dept . r 2-73 AFFIDAVIT G. HARLAN LEWIS , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • Subscribed and sworn before me this14 day of , 19 ICJ Notary Public in and for t e State of SHORE VIEW DE OPMENT NC. Washington, residing atm.__es,.*1.1L__ 1Name of No Public) ( gnatu e of Owner 4.40 3711 LAKE WASHIN GTON BLVD. N.E. Addrelsy), (Address) KIRKLAND WASHINGTON (City) (State) 8 2 7-0 411 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of±s ch application . Date Received o \ '\, 19 By: C< "-\ —) / Renton Planning Dept . e ��` 2-73 ANN r N G of iip _ ___ __ _ _ _ 0 e h' S.E.7GTH ST ,R gl _ c 'l� SITE Au • lei : o. S.E 90^`ST.' VICINITY MAP • SCALE: I"* 400' • . . .. . I ' TVPIraiL 017214 1122-11012 • •• • 11•20...-- Z 35." . • SSC 214r21"It Or 2 . t A ./ 0 rIrN••1' 51777 INA6g#/41 er..- a.m. - .IP--.•.'''';j‘ift%Oa.a'ail.a" -.---- "'''' '''..-----'-'-' ...'A. 4re - IITRAWA.0•MVP/ 10E TALLCC 00425T 2 Or 1.1 ..._ Irc: -'4•7., ........ .--'..js.,.. . 20.' ''.6°' Zi* I•\....... / • -----------"\....,......,ohai ,..-__..._Zoar;Ariooiwz..0.00000,0oo --1:"------_-- EZISTens re cm. ----•:_.\--."----- ft" ... s• LE WO o.s.VCSIT c."-••-•<:::::'--"...- --_,..-----%:>>---- -- -110101."- 2.2rICNDS 4,•41:•EI; ...) \ \ . . d°.-_______ .% ...;•-•,..,,,,,,,,ICIA-Vtirrar.FIJ7•V TOWARDS D -- \ \. \ ' SI..-6"°.%- .'-- . _-.0,--- , • ..\\ •• --- . i Ni.,,;-....-_______-____N 6 •. ,,,,I4 tt ...._....--_,---___-...- --=' S.,,...-.47 . • 4. \\\ ‘. ....,.....__________.// . --, "'''•.:\\ ....,..-___:t. s•\\' \\ / \ z 2i./VD2 ati•-PAP •- . . • C 1 i ini\ist•"pia..' .Wibl. '..I.111111111'...mink. •• '.,.y k. N. \ c , 1% f . . le . LO J• 4----- r ' .>......,, It ___ / /----' a.-- Ipm- , , ,, i 1 _____ --_, :--i's."- .-- —+' 6. • 0.a.s It ... ' • '" \,..) rap id a.CCIN utrtry I „--410"" 2•410• '''' .......&_•10 N ___ZoD 61 6•00 PI\\:\\ t i '77 .a• 1$ . •••___ - 4 ' 7.1_,..„......; i ''.!... ., 1 ' fan.41.1i0O l OW 2 -------. • - ( L i/ i / ../'-" ..,-; . ------- •••••--- -1 ) . I!i ,...'-'•• „.......--."- ,vog.,440534 -----111‘11111-7.---- V-------- \._. 3 .------ ."."-- L--- --..":-..---- „ ' ------Th',----1,- 0 - I II 1; - 00- ,_.. .- • —__ — \ , ••ii 1 .....---_.---_:_-_---, --.4.40-4.7-1,150/1 77 _ % . , \ ; I i! i r-"%- -------N g:11 .---"- _ _ . • • • • \I • O. • .0 t 1 1 4 Y 1 r ' '(F1;1; 1 c't;) c--9.- ' .) -..g.'E .... , ,at yv &J(3i, A- �00, )) , .k.O ,d. . . . .v,t�-4/.\;, - . ,• z . . . e . ... . ._ ... .. . . . . o®� . .. .._ • .' . f., _a s,/id_ ,,,..if„.. 1 . .,..i ci. . 0/0. s z ;..c.., . . c,z,.). _.j.,),..,....0Q,Q.F;.; .. -- ,i,. ...... , .....__......_...... 0....._ 5-3\ D • U J O4q .... . . 0 0 t', i. t • 7'LT/t/C)/ /1- //6\1 \ (,z;-,.4,•\,. ))i, 11),...,,j4(,--4-,E7)e- •,,.• 7A, i ° - 1‘4. „AiE -',•,•/,.,,• - '17-..'.,7. ,„,,,,•,./.,-,';,- „ :j 6 . : - ,7 1..1—).1„/11T,..2,.f-:I\•,1-:!1I1, • 1! s . TH 5 yr--,,---) , ) 0 . i ) i . ,-,-,!-- , ,' •,/.: / , ', . Er, • .; i .. i, i . L. .1 ' .., ) • ( ' '. ' ,.. .! 1 \ 11 ; •4 ,, ), ,, 1 , , . :, , . -(c/-./ ,, 1, , I k/t r. r , i . cs N_I,I I •\ >,... 1 izi ) 1 '•.\.\^:\\ i . i ) 1'9) ) // f.` :---,..._____, . i , , \ s. . \ i e,;', • .- • -- ..-":'.1 . ' 7 1 • . ‘ 1 •s, ' .,.„ , ,--,c ) I e. i• ', \ , -, ,, , Dl ,:. . - \ •-- Asp i . . i - 1 . 1 1 • i ' I .., ._ . . n. , 1 4 )t, •' • i ,., .. . ,. 60. ....___ ___", ___________ \\___ • •.. . 'r• , i -`',, . D :\.. \' '' \ \- • •--" . ..,\ ________ . '---) ,,.• 1 ,,, t \ ‘'1 e { 'I - \'-.• \\ ,_._, --\__:L-• -; - .. --\\ .- (,,i• . .)),.' ,) ) - /- ---).,---,- — , il i , f 11, 1... .,, i ii' ' ' v ,i- , . ''\. ' I., /C •, . ..------ J''''' i 11 A'•• . I.; ___.., Allik„cre, • 17,,, ) ' . • ,. )i 0•41,.........,..,C;'1.4: il 7/ , '(' •ed _..--.— I Li.'/' ( . ',. kl• ' • '1 0 ••••" --..- "---...... 1 1 -..-_,--..-.. • , 01, L , t • t '• ,V., ‘••••••• .•••••• 4....„.• re." .-," . : 1 ' I .LLJ . 0]• I . , '1 " • s* 0 ' ' 4, 1 // — Y. 19 6 000 > ( t \. 1 ----- , / < 1 1 t. • 1 'i , i t t 4 Qkr- L[!1".'4‘s*. \ # t ‘9 , - \• '.•,•3 , , . \\ % . \Th 1.-1,„...;......,.' ;:// . , 1. 7 JilrAt \ \ 'N, tr••••, I--/ i r•-..., • IT: ,?A 1 j (7' ' ii , .,8:\ \ ' ----, • • ', Il 1 / • ' \ L-- - ‘ . c\,s ..,.,, 3, , . •, ,, ' p ' == t . \ • ,. r. . • s.,... ,•. ' [Fiji\,_ _ ___ _ . •2;\ e,‘_,';0 1 . N•Qi ! V . ,-"is,,.,, ) .;f,-. ' ,,,i, N. ., , _.----- ,-.--Y—;.,- n r•••••• r••••••• •-,,,,,,,i, ew .••• . •••••4.,. ••••••••••••tt,,, ,,, ,,,,,, \ ' \ • r•—• , r 7 .,--- /— • .17.1.,04- ' - .I. ... , , , ...-- .1 ;001. ' ) • 1,1 '11 lif .•Or ' , • • I •-•,.. .„......'...4.4'.. ._,.. 4 o .( : ., i t c_j__I 1,7: ,..s.,, .,.,„...., ..,=. ,,,.,. -*-4,..4,•:!.til ‘,\' , - . 1 ...=-' ''._:_ 11/ ....:-. .-= - -'1:2 ' 1/) . x . \ " %, . p-..\\ 4,, • v, , - . .) \ ,-... ; 4/ rrl ,,/r,... ,)...• • ,• ' r \ ,I".' ‘ . ! ( ''',\\ ,t — , I / L', .' ,.\- . ' ,..tii ' 1 / ' 0 i ill \. •: \ \ k` qj k.,%k QI I 4j ty s • ) •r''',4.4- 1' . : ) ) 1 ' . 0 • ' \ ' ' . , .,„ E "s. / / . . ''''‘''' "".ii-... i •. .-, t- .•'4.• Stkiz...— •-______ c.,. . ., f /.: /40 , ‘-'.,-r''' ,o• 'f. . • 1 /,... . ,r 0 ' i I ) : ...,f----. tl (! ("AO° (-• ''• ....- . ... 1' ...—1•3•°. 71---1,./*----\/":%:-----.:\\ -‘.. . . ,./. z ....-;...- ,../ ......-- ///// L.,./iy, 1. r lJ v IO , t ,r„ i ,_ = =,,_,,._,,,- ( ( ,T), j ,\\)_, ..,. — 11 (. .,..)., \ yi. ij )r \f.4..- ,, \‘ _,--,__ . . ,__ ( ) , =__= = == = . . .‘c>.;_-/ ' I,' . , , ) ,, ,, oc 5 \ 1 ,) '''') , ,3 \\!..?„," ,. ) \ (1,0 i, (riA : .^11 k\l..\ -!' 111 Q. -,' --. ni“rP- - -41-( _ ( ( \ ' i M -7 1 \ )) ) :'',/, i •' )1]. i i \ I ii i .4•1 ,..-7 : ,AL: ik,, „, --, , N N. lid t s- /,/," ___ ____.: =_______. . ., E3 1 i I )t) \ \ s' AK (71 \ Icl \ s• `.J y/ :! i 1 -.. --‘ -9P �I, I I (( ../ D II': i — \ ) -.\ , , \ , ... 1 \ . ; ) • 1 V /. --- j''0 *° frb i( ‘\\ I ' -4 61 A '1 z_....., =.___ O , \ i' '€� 1 . /, ,.....i. : 1 )0 ,, , ,. . ,! , rto 15 ) YNi ,, j :.i I .0 . ir' C4\ ""'W."''' 1 !II ./( . r e 1: 9_F2.17_,--"'—, ._____, 7/// 161: , I2( ,/ !i '.. 1 r y .--- -_ ,,// /7 ' (/iffP j I,. a 11, 04 \ .\*c‘" ) !f i Z,r) d K e � - — q , ` IJ I� ��> ',l / N G i 1 - T.,: k‘ 1_, : e a , ) i 44 ,! Ii .r_ _ \ 1 -LS M. 1. i i -..-)) , 0 it , ) „.., . \\ , , ., . ...,.... ') y 1 i \ ?0 \\ : :' • ) ///// ` . . --- ...r-1- - \ — y 7 \ ' ire , $ i / a "'' / /L //,'"---"N\ ' \ \ ( ( .I.1;. ,O. ',"11 / / / I I . 0 0 n ! ,,i , \ \ I ,/ .1 k i . - C\ . , / , ! '', ,e iu i CI \ \ , -1 ' . 1 1 f _ , i , rw/ II r ) . 1 ►. FORM #151 BUILDING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON APPLICATION FOR GRADING LICENSE TO BE FILLED OUT IN DETAIL BY APPLICANT OR LICENSE CANNOT BE ISSUED Owner: SHORE VIEW DEVELOPMENT. INC. JOB Address LAKE WASU.BI VD. ANl S.F. 76TH ST_ Address: 3711 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. Legal: LOTS 184, 185 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 HILLMANS LAKE WASHINGTON DIVISION NO. 3 Telephone: 827--0411 • Cubic Yards Involved 22,500 Estimated Value of Work $ 30,000 Description of Work THE PROPOSAL CONSISTS OF FILLING APPROXIMATELY 3.07ACRES. IN ORDER TO DO THIS FILL IT IS NECESSARY TO REDESIGN ONE DITCH AND TO DESIGN ANOTHER DITCH TO INTERCEPT OFF—SITE FLOW. Contractor; State License No. Address: Renton Bus. Lic. No. Telephone 1 • Civil Engineer: CHARLES R. BENNETT Starting Date AUGUST 1979 Address: 720 EAST MAIN, PUYALLUP, WA 98371 Completion Date JUNF 1985 • . Telephone: 838-3474 • (1) This application does not constitute a license to work. Work is not to commence until grading license is posted on premises where work is to be performed. (2) Certification is hereby rendered [hat no work is to be done except as described and that all work shall confcrm to the applicable codes . 3 W•Nrk in publ i': right- >f--ay an' or ease:aents is not authorized c.ader this -•,plicatior