Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA79-407 / - :- 5 ,-.L...,.. ,..:L'i; .!,,,,1 efe,,•N'''6'.,,,,,, .1c. :7:77:n. .-.''':, !;.:p7f-,74 i,,,,,.'t yit,r, ..,.7 ,,, ; . , '': ;:o ,‘,,,:. '.,-. '''.\ ,Y i''.,-f i .,, .. , ;, ,.41 :::: .''.: ''..!;I .;:: 1 ., _, l'''' ' i\, `1, 't .,1 kZ.J 1-'• 1,=. A ,,g', j,'Ifi24:1 :?0 V, ,,1 ;,,;* '''''e;1` [4,'";`' -'" Fr• ?1•!' 3.'';; 9 c,4 •.---, ,-, t,.,. zi, ,.r:% .4, ' ;•Fli i •,.•i., ,ea. ,,.r.c GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADIRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON S.W. SUNSET BLVD. (SR-900) BETWEEN 80TH AVE. SOUTH AND S.W. 3RD PLACE (81ST AVE. SO. ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT i S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF •, ' (C: ',' Alt' ,:, - t -,,:( ,. 'g,,,, ;; 4. :::: ,' .,...., . ' *kl n'S t.' ' JD ;' , . . ,.. .,. 4i..- la. h'' ' A. ,;, :: 11 i T(10 BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAIVVAPiS9 MUNICIPAL ,00•,'UILDING ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 A.R. A.M. P.M. v . , • 4 + C: ''Il'' "‘ CE ,P: t\ ' 11 k G ITEM ri (R-1 TO R-3; SEPTEMBER 4TH HEARING CONTINUED TO) , C t ii 4• i:i.,., e 1,, ,,,,, ,, ,,st, t , _ (SEPTEMBER 18TH ) C- jig il,s:: ,;.' II i il13) — (APPLICATION FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES) '' .4) : ,,,,..., ," ii... ,.:. ' ' , (AND/OR MEDICAL CLINICS ,) ) 1 ... ,. _In ''''sll i ' ''' ' iali PR OVA' ivi,.,:-Alv . . , . • .... , , , . ,y.„... , : ,,, a- r-="RH, fircz MT- 4„ r, ! 't•if k v„9 ^'. .A,T,.r. i 44L' ' 1"I' tt '.1 . L V ki Kv4A ' Ak‘AL3Hutrilgt-,30 fi ri,111 tu,=3Hirli":"LdwuRn''' LI L i FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE RE,4i:VED WITHOUT *.:f.-1).1',':R AUTHORIZATION 4)))1-.1. 1 Renton City Council 11/19/79 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING -Continued . LID #315 Councilman Clymer noted area B-1 and part of the central Sidewalks business district area and inquired of wheelchair ramp require- Burnett S. ment, being advised by Gonnason.of the legal requirement. Continued Councilman Trimm noted that bids could be rejected if too high. Alternate sources of funding were discussed. Moved by Clymer, Second Perry, close the public hearing. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, CONTINUE HEARING UNTIL DECEMBER 17. Councilman Stredicke requested information for .the 12/17/79 continued hearing from the City Attorney re delayed or deferred. assessments for elderly and from the Administration re alternate Hearing Continued funding/federal funds for project to accomodate elderly citizens. to 12/17/79 MOTION CARRIED. - - AUDIENCE COMMENT MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, SUSPEND RULES AND PRESENT AGENDA ITEMS 9.a. and b. CARRIED. Kohl & Christianson Hearing Examiner Kaufman recommended denial of rezone from Addition Rezone R-1 to R-3 property located between 80th Ave. S. and SW 3rd R-392-79 & Special Place, north of SW Sunset Blvd. ; Kohl and Christianson Addition Permit SP-.4 7 73 R-392-79 and SP 407-79. Appeal was filed by Attorney E. 0. Appeal Thomas, III , on behalf of Kohl Excavating, Inc. and Ivan C. Christianson claimining errors in judgment by the Hearing .. Planning and Examiner and stated reasons. - Development Committee Report Planning and Development Committee Chairman presented report Kohl & Christianson noting consideration of Kohl and. Christianson Addition Rezone Rezone and and recommended that Council upohold the decision of the Special Permit Hearing Examiner denying rezone application R-392-79• MOVED Denied BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE COM- MITTEE.* Gary Jackson, 1919 Dexter Ave. N. , Seattle, Architect representing the owners/applicants, explained site not well suited to single family residences and would create problems. Planning Director Ericksen used wall maps and explained area and proposed use of a professional office building. Upon Council inquiry it was noted those opposed to the rezone were. present and- petition opposing rezone had been filed with Hearing Examiner bearing signatures of 4138 area residents. *MOTION CARRIED AND Rezone denied. • • Irving W. Hull Recommendation of Land Use Hearing Examiner, Fred Kaufman, Rezone 'R-394-79, for Irving W. Hull application for rezone was denial . Property Appeal, located in vicinity of 421 Burnett Ave. S. ; rezone from R-3 to R-4 requested to permit construction of a six plex residential ' structure. Appeal was filed by Attorney Mark E. Fortier for Planning and Irving W. Hull claiming error in fact and law. Development Committee Report Planning and Development Committee. Chairman Perry submitted Irving W. Hull report noting consideration of the Hull appeal to Rezone 394-79 Rezone and recommended the Council modify the following findings and Denied conclusions: Finding No. 11 and Conclusion No. 4 are in error but the committee found not substantial and not compelling for modification or reversal of the Examiner's recommendation to deny the requested rezone. The report stated the proposed rezone is premature and the requested use would have a detrimental effect on surrounding properties and recommended Council affirm the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOP- MENT COMMITTEE.* Mark Fortier, Applicant's Attorney, outlined errors in facts and law, claiming area in transition; adjacent to central business district; proposed rezone within Comprehen- sive Plan for area, not adjacent to linear park but to parking lot; adjacent property illegally converted to multiple dwellings; impact would be from 4-plex' to=:6-plex. Discussion ensued. *MOTION CARRIED and rezone denied.. Executive Session MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL HOLD. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. Council President Shinpoch requested attendance of Mayor Delaurenti , and Assistant Parness, Personnel Director Green and Negotiator Treverton. CARRIED. Time: 9:30 p.m. . 1r_ RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting November 19 , 1979 Municipal Building Monday, 8 :00 P . M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Council President; CHARLES F. SHANE (arrived COUNCIL at 8:25 p.m.) , THOMAS W. TRIMM, EARL CLYMER, GEORGE J. PERRY, MARGARET PROCTOR, RICHARD M. STREDICKE. CITY OFFICIALS C. J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; WILLIAM IN ATTENDANCE E. BENNETT, Deputy Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director;. MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Asst. ; BRUCE PHILLIPS, Fire Department; JOHN BUFF, Police Department; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks Department PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Daily Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND TRIMM, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 5, 1979 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. SPECIAL AWARD Mayor Delaurenti displayed Special Civic Award to the City Landscape from Washington Chapter American Society of Landscape Architects Architecture ,for developing a unique trail system along cedar river from Cedar River Trail Lake Washington to City Hall , as well as developing Planning Ordinances which specifically refer to landscape requirements. The Mayor commended the. Planning Department work on the project. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, L. I .D. #315 published and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened Sidewalks the public hearing to consider Local Improvement District No. Burnett Ave. S. 315 to construct and install concrete sidewalks on the east side of Burnett Ave. S. between S. 2nd St. northerly to a point 88.5 feet north of the north margin of S. Tobin St. Letter of protest was read from Minnie Ellison, 88 Burnett Ave. S. , claiming property owners on east side are being asked to pay for sidewalk that will benefit only the people on the west side; also that property owners adjacent to her south boundary have installed a sidewalk several inches above the natural ground level and above her walk and above existing walks on Tobin St. Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason reported the one protest received constituted 5% of the total dollar amount of the LID which is $23,936.84. Continued Persons present making inquiries: Alex Cugini , 61�1 Renton' Ave. So. , questioned $25 per linear foot cost. Public Works Director Gonnason explained the cost of appurtenances charged against all properties: four wheelchair ramps ($2,000) and 50' curb and gutter. Ivan Tangen,fManager of Cedar River Terrace, noted traffic hazard, need for marked crosswalk, dead end street sign and possible stop sign. Minnie Ellison, 88 Burnett S. , noted walk will be four to five inches higher than property level . Mrs. Dahl , daughter of Ellison's, complained of high cost for Seniors on social security. Public Works Director suggested HUD Block Grant funds be investigated. Sandy Webb expressed the opinion that when improvements are for the benefit of the newly built retirement home, it appears unfair to assess the adjacent properties. C. Ellison, 88 Burnett S. , inquired as to liability for anyone injured by stumbling on raised. sidewalk. City Attorney Warren advised that once design and construction accepted by the City, liability rests with property owner. Discussion ensued. Upon Council inquiry, Public Works Director explained the L. I .D. .was started by City initiated by resolution. • - a.. f - <:.•3'p�:•' '">;%. i- .,t .:V 1n':el'".i,t}.('}:,,> 'e. • { .; 'rs='. 1,r „`A�t��'ri;^.,:�i J - �,u... - ..1. .'i` .-.'�{3�t.;�r,f•'"',ly"?'�.;,;ts"`.�. 4�i,;�� 1. ,7. '.1 �'�I,7, ..k:r •�.,.,:;.�>A'.�`i r.),;� Y.r � ,-,f. •'rf: •'.s y1 5:°' .:•'.LE. "�:,.. f �'.. `t!`:.:. M ,., .`�:.r;. -:2'i=•d:;1?. ;>tfi?;'^�'M.:. ,+, 4if:' . '1•' '4„ -:4Urw •, ;' , c. 2•,c;=..FJ��';,.,�+d., t tom'+ _7j...t.tt,r4[aa ,,t. ar''- .Y .rr '•y.,t.: -r, 4• �{'. .. x:r�. 3,, � `1��"'15..,;.. 4; '�+�r ,y i�,�,r ,q i:J3{.!j'.': `t'r.a,4.�, n�'" ':d,L:,,. `•�t: :i' •,� "?:, air,^,�r.5,, Ic,. .F:.p'Y r,1'+U'�tr.)y�.�P, v,+lra.,.` - i. 4. .4�uiw. y �d ''•p. ,.. :��, �., ,:,Lft. ;, y f. ,•'"}r_4..' nti�"'Tr ir i.l:i 4 r X;xrltTi:':..-" ';y Yw.'v', t;1;t«-lr f!y..y,- t i' _ 7. c1. a�"`r.„ ',? a ...'• if.;' J.r.` 4 ::45:.,.,, o'?i I�i;J;':, i•'. ,. ?,,:.:. .r ;tic'. ;rv•,a,'v4,:b. ca•,• �.°re ^•'t�, t:&'.,. 4•l�!,,:ai,�f r�.... k,f�•., �.. fr, .r .rS,'f r%y.,.. 'J,{ ,, - ,t.t:�,{i. :.j...�'.7:;^t , eS::'_,..n.:dv_S,i'. .J• .\:<{+�,,, 7,rd.. ,l+t�':;,.;; !!.)-•r%';" Sf .. .. - 'S a, .;S„Z. .;..t,.,,f'., •1:•-✓, ,4 .he. ;#- "Is .�.. -,• ,y�C?;. 5., _7,.:��+;•. r� ti> • •,,.A. : `i',N.I:I.;; .k.:,,.,•s..:'�w+;,, _ w5¢, ,,�,..•M4'.:+t` J.,:: 'r'•, .A knit• ' rf< :,?I .y;C. �t d :'•i,!,1•etc '. .,y _ ,q.i .°,,• ;i'� r .�a'r 'rr.'A',ko. / yj;.i; ,.g!^,��`;,:x:i'�`^v... THE: ..�f - . �'�.f r�' :RENTON 'WASHc`9$a5S:, .'•:h :{° ''. ,s-:?.{:: 'IfAi,INl 1PA!": ..Cyr,yy1 °MIL' A '••.i:O ; •'','1'' .Yti :e;. •.S "-i'`P t': =°t<'' 'rj ii: ij,,. • iFi• . 0• r,• RLES .��' ,�" 'A:MEAD., 44 • -DEI.ORES�: `o• ;` 4,> DER t ii:`:• 1'F' u 1c. !h / tr :l'' 1.. .; •"" .ram, `-s 0 ,tea-. ,te ` ,.,Sy;,;'.;-;+ :'r"' _. .i- L . r a+k. ri‘'In' ^Aa• Y':•.r•• " � iY . ) tt Tif , - •• ovembr< 20 792, JIli 2 t' +i^:ice ;;` .' I �I �'"e . .wi•: . ;, ::s - : ., = ,7rv}y ,s ;. : :. • � • `.•r 4 •a� •• f:u` rv�� • .•i, r• Y 'f .'4 • • i'. <1v y t i' :AT :.yyr n xl. ,n7, ,7.. at >�,� Powell ,Moss &;�;• 3.1 •4, ..�� :'r�� Lane M e ,, :.f;�.. ';,.:.' �:�'''; :�.>;;';�.t,, ,�a`. ,�F. i,:.:,y •, � t of Nyr� .M:: .,G• :r13.,�4 ^ - r ;'`r. ,.1_ ••hi,. r'i; �. "r,�- ,tZ•iP�' -,��• .,i}'�:� ir.": �: "k;: ',: • At to rney s a La '::. ,< ,-,KJ..?-A - ,$,. .., :,M;:: ��`•:,.f4y'°,g'�y%%, ,�•, .a,:'Av.t+;r.,,,. <r`}i'+') •.L`i .'iv,:"" - 4t , i, - ;,i'P� - .a= wer=Rainier" To r Bank ,y Rainz :�ri �,-, 1 . 81 • '�'e WA� '�9 0 Seattl .~ RE .• .',,„. .,.; '• . F .1� • a: • n h 4t :1+" ATTNMk a � s' v . ,iu `. !� � Y. y:lr,. tt1 'i:' :r''_�!,rr v . -1' Rj:M1.,.' ;5�e. `�v -,, :..•w. .•f • �',4i . ' ' " ` ',t.- • • • Y ' `{�] ..�.' `,•a• �Y::- fnk: k •:{::'d orh.t 'Ch ian. sonyr,i✓.tI.:?Ar•: Jt,;. • ''. £^?k4. .nt: eia "'of Resone'. rom R1 :. p�, =s3K J & : rit .....,;,'v�l ; i • :'. , • .; FY,.:'-t�f:,u lt4f,' :a � R=38279�! :and=;SF40•r,fig' A-: ,i.:,,acr'1Ji.i:s'•;'_ , _;:",< .'E,:,,i,. -':VArey'N r =.tit , ;i:,':La:`1f:a . ,f,, ;:)i:- ?.;.!,t:, y. i, 11,.. i'• viY.77 • ti• • v�f.,•i' . ice.:' - 4t' leme • ^0. Gent n: fi • , ;j�1 7 b"r- 9'•.f oeme -'1� - 'ts 're ar-�".meetin o 'N v 9 ,:. �. , )>"F� :;:� . 'The Fenton City Councfl";.' at':i .$�;1. $ ',', , has concurred in:the"'Planning'and' Development Committee'.'recommedatan l`V ;F to uphold 're;one'denial,.'deci'sion .as..',above'- eferenced l= ,tja;.; ' cal f „th "1.0d •Use•'Henri •Exami'ne,;, s.:d• '' . :, -*/ ' / ';:: �.v ,: p-.5.. _ ,,•: Excer is from '.conn ^3.'J,meet' A n �."': - t;' .,thereby denied - e p .d .i.: g are,:g'tCa hed 'tieretiii �.;' .. r.,''�;- 'x �,�:_. Ike; �t ,,>- ';,:.';'•' ;;: a. for you 'further nforma ...oi:;' , '. '} t.✓':i .:, .t ',1°?�iF`y :c'�F-t '�.��,'r1 :�.'a1�,• $, .L* .,xr ,154. -,r'" e".n: ..YL` k .<t'',1 iL.� :�f ,j1; (: , 7 kl' • • -.f ^ i, •�P1'' 1•e �S, ;. � r,rt 11 • w •a^ UY'1 v 1.1 Ce,i it=c[7, •r: ;' ,' • "a :,1V:. 5 • ,.r.- •!'';i.n - ••;_:+:% .jA.. � , : NTO ' ' - _;, '' �. .CITY OF=�RE V• ,_ r.. :,.Y, ::..t. - 1 - !its>,'•:. ,,7,, '., ,a" • - :.:. ; s,:r:. 'T::�+::i:r;;; ' .Mead Ci'• . 'ir' ,} • '.. ryr:• ';."�Y. �..:• - • ;i, S ''id•a.Y `.L�r~ �`j:,:,:, _ Y • e, �r. i•. •tin "�, ,lg't;`:'.h' a:f'�.�;�;:•. .. pDAM/ t - • •+1:.,\' '':a''':i': OI':n:''J • "L. i'1ur• �:.h•..•.r,.,,�d" � - :�rat - ,3i` :�•1.t` 9. ^.;., ..L`.d • )!�' :,�'�;y.''' ,�A7§t+l%t%^ ,f, w, ,,,.,a''•yr`.' • :iP;e 1 gip.. r "t:.;yd['.i:-,:' T.•l'•::•,,'�t:'. r., •?c".trt;i • s, h�' � s,: Ltt 1 1 _ ear':::..',` :V ,.L. e. 1. C1( ,ire • • - • •• 2f'. :a'..,, ,,< ,Jram`-: , < _ •:e.// ,.1'."::C,. ,f •• ',I ,t. �,y*�% 1 & Christi neon. :.�" ' " . ,.• : `C c Foh :.:J• . ,r' ,c,;• Gr, r;: 'r1�"rn(: :fr • • t , i: v. -,: .7 ) :7 i' t 'r�J i•t''' :1 i'•Y';wy .:Lr:., rS.• ?,• a't, a'}',`ti'r'., ,.5?p'fr:.2.J .,iA.•,- :r ^{ .1' :iY. p' „II,p:n':'!r a')'•. 9,t: is _ ` 3 MAPS , PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMITTEE REPORT November 15 , 1979 KOHL AND CHRISTIANSON ADDITION REZONE, R-392-79 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of the above referenced decision dated September 27 , 1979 , and recommends that the City Council uphold the decision of the hearing Examiner denying said rezone application. i , t J G .cxr.ge P rry, Chairman j • bar l yrri r �f � Bar3aara Shinpoch : _, Of R- ' -4, ., THE, CITY OF RENTON `g' � r z .. ; MUNICIPAL BUILDING .' 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 :2 e, fg• , 0 . , O CHARLES J. DELAURENTI 1 MAYOR ® DELORES A. MEAD ,o. CITY CLERK 041f0 SEP1 0 ` . November 8, 1979 . RE: Appeal of Land Use, Examiner' s Decision Dated , September 27, 1979, Kohl & Chr i st ianson Addi t i on, :Rezone R-392-79 and Special. Permit •SP-407-79;. To Parties of Record: The above referenced subject, scheduled for review by. the Renton City Council , November 5, 1979; has been :held in the. Planning and Development Committee. , The appeal will be considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of November 19, '1979'.at 8:0.0 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South. - , : If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. , Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON `. Delores' A. Mead, C.M.C.. City Clerk' DAM/st ygl F it • x_,;,: :,xir',^, '',{Hr r' Y OF RENTON �;„'MUNICIPAL BUILDING. ' 200 MILL AVE. SO_ .' RENTON,WASH.'98055 fi ''>ti. ;fa= Va �~ 'CHARLES J •DELAURENTI MAYOR. R DELORES A. MEAD ;s;; p� !�.+. _. co CITY CLERK r O,Q4 ��i� EO SEP1 *E October 12,. 1979 CERTIFICATE OF• MAILING STATE OF WASH I•NGTO_N)' COUNTY OF KING ) „ ' • DELORES A. MEAD,.City Clerk, of the City of Renton, being first • duly sworn on'•oa;th.,• depo'ses ,and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident_ of, ;the State of .•Wash i ngton', over the age of 21 and not a party .to. nor. interested in this',matter. That on,.'the`yl'2tFi`day,:of• October'; 1979, .at the hour of 5:00 p.m'. , ,your aff;ian.t:.du:'ly•s'.maifi`el-iyand.,;;p;laced. in;`th'e` United States Post Office at Renton, ^King Co,un:ty,r:;;Was• hington:, by.:first class. ma:i, l ,, a: true and, correct NOTICE OF 'APPEAL F,I'LED .BY:. EVAN.;.0:."THOMAS, III , ON BEHALF OF KOHL EXCAVATING INC. AND ..I VAN C: .:'CHRI"STIANSON ;R.EGARDING REZONE •R-392-79' AND SPECIAL PERMIT ; SP-407'.79',.T0.'ALL';PAI? 'I ES :OF :RECORD t;• �4 - •. .t,.,,,,,4,..,..:.: ....,.:-,,,. ,..,.„.,,,:::,,,,,,,.., : ., „.,,,,,..,,..:,...,...:.: :,..,:t'.., Delores :A. .Mea'd, City C1 •,rk ..,..... .. . '-`` SUBSCRIBED .AND 'SWORN ;.TO'BEFORE., .ine-4 4this 12th• .day. of October, 1979.•. , • t {' 1-.'.,i,..•. 1Votar Pu,b.l i,•c.,.i n :and for the State • y Of Washington, residingdi i n"Renton. St a; ; • , e:r., '^ : kr .. _,I rf ` 4 4." THE CITY OF RENTON to MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • A o�i ..,,, . ..� CHARLES J. DELAURENTI I MAYOR • . DELORES A. MEAD ,o • �' CITY CLERK �� • O,p4 o SEPit.51) / October 11 , 1979 APPEAL FILED .B'Y EVAN 0. THOMAS, III , ATTORNEY, ON BEHALF OF •KOHL • EXCAVATING, INC. AND IVAN C. CHRISTIANSON • • RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner's Decision Dated September 27, 1979,, Kohl & Christianson Addition, • . Rezone R-392-79 and Special Permit SP-407-79 To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the . public records offi'ce , this .date, along with the proper. fee. of $25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. • The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be:reviewed by the Council.'s Planning and Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the, committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of November 5, 1979 at 8:.00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON ' Q 711-ettet Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st . .. .•!•,,:.,w,,,•,.:,),,..1„..,„,.... •,,,,, , , , . . 44 ,.,•.(,',•;;;1,:,'.'e,,.4 , .,,,,,,,..,,,;)„,,,,...;„x,53,:;:,,,,",..;4',7;;,,,,,,,:,;.e.41,,,,,..v,.,...,.-.,,,,,,,,,,,i,,,,,,,,,,,e,,,i4,,, ,,,c,;! ..,•,;,,,,.':‘,„ ., .',,,,:. • , ' , . , •, ,, ,, 1,.CapkV3,6,4,r,?Aili;',,..,i'N'-.':::'.',,,,'i.,...,, '.'4.-'4:;;.' -`,-'!;1'''''-',.%g"'Nt4:--1 -'',,,,,,,,V,'0.,V-4,q,,,,,t-,',-.': :,,,`1,!4'i,L.,.n.r., --,,',), •-, -•,•',•-', , -,.. .,. ., . . .. , „ , , . • •, 1,',... • .6A ''':,'"4:4'Agetti?',.EV.;',, r:'-.4:'.''''.''7'-';'..:3. -1;::',:"•,01'.-4.'??1;1:167.1.0441 t,'$t.C"'''''''',V.C.,,.....i,,,.'17... ,q':'$.40,21-'f,l''',. ..;,,;...j0'..i'....•%.' -.'--.',...'„.;''. .,.-...--,...'''' .'''''•.' .‘'. ...,' ' '., . ','.' ,',.. ''''' ,‘'',.F . •‘ ' ',b ,Y, • .,:#4•10.44,,..4tg,-:ii,;,,,,,;„:„'•',,:-.,:::,"e..;.:,',V:fgiikP!CiNk,,.'f.,157,,,V1,1.T44A,Pf:,5 41,4. ,,,, ,...y,c1:0: " ..-,,,,`,, ,,, , . , . r ! ' ,.,,,,,':,.C!,,•-v-' fl', ' ;:i.;. ,' tf ,''il' . Is,k .N i'", V-'"'''''' ',•';•'0',•‘,11',;14:4k6.1,'-',&',,Vi'l,,,:qk.Of:A>. .' '''','4''',,.nk,,. .q. ',,,i144',' '.,..' .' ':,,,, .;],[7:01N.,/-'4:i.,'.:(,:-:!,'.".4, N-„,.. 0 1-1-1t045,..-% 0 ,.„, 1:?-0 , ...,.,. ..'...: . ,•„*„ Alg,,,:',0;:gqi,:k"-.';,-,,t,,,:.:fr'''.y;.;T:',;?..:,.;.1•,:=.'.:;..jiit':,'3',7, ittFv,NcE-illyEpARImENT:.c,;g4(1,.,,s, ',:.'ti.,-.0i?f,:&,'iegi.iiVii';:-.45;•''P,i1,,:??-:,,,, ,'...'..;--- W : ' VE':::,,;±'•',!.''..';.'',:.ki,',...,';';,':,'•••':''::'•!:',''';';.?-:.';','-';'''-'‘.:'''''-''.',.,'•,'!''','''NV':';'':'::•1,,;:'!''•'''-,,`"''':''';','W..*''s'',''''''.i :.' 1":',', "ivi,"opi.,,,4,44,vA.,,,,,,t,,,,,,-...2:,,,,..,, :,:,-,,,;‘,,,..,„",;,•,,',-,,;:•:,,.F:*.-.,-1,4c;v:,..4:;1:•;;;.,t,:s.,,,,4---i•.:',-:044,,,,,igAi43?:',,',-;;;•'..;;F;g',.-tf- ,,,,geir:::',",:‘;'.'4i, ':;'t,:.:,::-!;;",• .:::':::'.''.!''..;-.F':,Y•;.<•'.C,:'.,lti. ' .. . '."''''''.:::,':;.i./•, •:,:,:,-,.., "...,'' ,.,',"!•'V4•1'1•t'-f'i1f-° f..-16--,,-,,i,:3,,,0,,4,,,Y,,.S:5;,;!,,,f i1e•:„•j,"4?;,7.,...i::;;‘.•.'4,,‘,•;•-,.,.:,''.,:';1,.,-•,,,-;•,,::•;i•'•,:i';.N"., T..., b:,..ii•-1,,-.}.:i:4'„•;A•;:•.s•-f,,,t' I,•[:...N.q,44G.c,...: 86 .:-,.,,,a.., ,.!...,,,,,,..-,,r,,,,':pi.•:„.i,,,,:,,..,:: .,,,,,,,,..•••:;,, ' .-..,. •-,,::,„. •••,,•,,•,•-•. - ..,,.f./..•.-.;,•,...-. •, -:-..,; 19: 7. : '.4);JJ.-„,;',''•ikA'••',,;.'::•-z•,-,.•,•:::-.,„• .',vt.•,•:,5•>:',„fn•,•:.,,•-;•-:•::•,•• .•...."".::,•:'••• -•••:. ''',. .....:.-• • ''•2',-'-,• •:',:', •:,::;•'.;":• •. • '''•::-•• • ,,,,,,:,,,„;•::,:,z:•,,,„,•_;.,,,,-;.-'...:•••-.0;1.,,,.•.•••,',•-,,J4:,:iy••••.-4-i'ilarr, ./..,.2-, ;,.',...,..;•-.4.•••:, , •-, -,,,-„;;;,r..,i4...,-,e,,,,,,,.:-.•,,,.... • '.‘7,-;..;,-,..-,•-•, ‘1,-, . ----" , ' ;-',-,:,..,...',','. -.' . ' - ' • . ,'., : t,,,f--,,,,w-rkl.,-7--,a1,----,4".•'''''RECEIVEDOr'1':' v•271."' '•'' ' ' ''' 4•••'' '''"''''"'''''''''''''''''''' ' ''': •.'':'•: ','; . ' ' ''''' ' :'''"' ' •••:. ' • • -•'. ' . ,..44,Vr Or.4-4;.•,,,t`-':c0).%,,i P;-•'!.1.-zi.,-.,,L,.iv , • , .....- ••••,. . . "•4 dir• ' 111,„ „.,•,•,..,.4..,,,,....-,,,,,,,? ,,,,•:--4,-4,z,s,,,,,,,•y,, .,-,•,..:11.,,e,.;,•. :,.., .,;:.y,..- ,?,.„1,..-.„...•,,,:,•,...i„--0.,,,,.':',1,-1.4r:i.,',,:•;!:',_'./c;1.::'••••••..•••-•'?:•-",.. :,•••• '''. ' ' .';.•'''`,...4'"•' ;.:, :, ' , '..,'''.'''• * .P.iip„tiV;Vii,far;.*':'t,,,','4.1.'?.-.",-,.-:', ''''.:i''''.''S.'.','-`.4'S'::1'N'',Y'&1...-;,,Vf%,,,:l.:',.;`'.:\,' JO'.,:4 it.';';'46'..:-,V'r•.;',':.?t,24P•''J'.'1: 1;'';.--,V-:::'''''''.' -'..'; " '• ' .' ''. . '''" .. . gi'.‘.NOtblitik.0),,.4,-;!..,'.;P:=t4"4%.,--,:';',{:,','...::.',..!,'•'•..,r..;',‘2•.. .,',:-f c''1.,,',...5,ll',Z:;,,:',;..,1,,‘'.-,,',.,,',,,",i,,,,l',,,..,,:,<.,.,.i', „,:-t••„le,-•-',VA r'.,',..4::-..Y-•,:i's'it7.‘,4•I'vAlii'4:;-',••',14':'•;',k•,••;'•:;"••••i,',4;';:,-",•!,•,• . fj•ri.gli`;', ..,,,htir,,?,..,%,,4.,::,!:!-;,,,,;,,f',,,,,,•:-,,`,••_'-,,,•,•,,,,,•',i.,.te-,-,;•,/,P,•••A',..r.1..-'y5;:',•,,,'4..;••;‘,: -, :'-',:,,r4.4,-4.••.:4_)4,•:;.?1,,,,;,„•.,•;1,44.,•••2,,,,,,,v4,6,-,,%,t,-,-,A,v-;.9N1,,-,4•,',..-2,,,,?),,,,,,..,•:::•,;,,,,‘••:„.4-,•:,,,,,;,,• ,„:2••.:,,,•-•i, -. . -, • . 1,•,,,g;:el--,tig;-..„.:ii'v4.1"1,:t.:;4,,:-.i,',,.r.:.:..: - •• ••,•-•-•.i-, -k.-'•• -,,...,;;.; ,....• -•:•o-,,,s.--•f•,.,,,,r,....,,;•,,•% .• ,,,,i;,t,......,.,;,., .„ . .„.. ... .,, ,,,...4.1...,i. . ''1,,,WC,iCt,..45 k.4.7:.1.6.„1;1:':.''11 i":''."'::.'''''5 4- ' •'-'4 '':'-'-''''__„.., .e.) ...''i::.•;'''-'.'44: '''.f,r-V(..Li1L';'.'i-b-?).1.'44I.'''1;,:, :;...]',.:: ,,'",';.• ,-,-.:::"Y1,-;'".'qi't'',,,7'1',..'',',',.;,'. -':''..'',,..' : :.'',-.:'....„ • fi,,, -, ' • Le), lik-J.wdyt';:r.i'Aitw,-*: .,'':r..':.;,,,"„ -' - . ' '' ,7 -4..4,-.4.-,',..7:•',•,':.,'''A..-:: -..tztf,••-..;',.....,', :,,,,;'.' '..,'..?!. ..,,`:.•..t''''',': .'.„ '- ' ..'-' "...-:.'. 1'- ;''7 . •- l''••-.' ... •1,,•,...1.—'../.4) ; 4;1;•'"'•.q''I'::•)'$'?!:','Fit-;4'''.!*;-,'•f:.''.;'•:::, .' ! '.''',;.• •:-...i '1''•, '-'•-'•;•'',"''..;•-q!...;.=';g''dr''-' -';'4•;:''i,i,..V.',.-,..',.--!,'o'''.',.''..,-2.,''...-i•.''•Lar.'17-c-:•'''..",,;;;;c:i. .''' ',',,-;','''..'•-•.:., '.•. ,. —'-..: , , ' . r', ';'' ' , '' ';.'. . 04i';4g:i;:.?..!:',..!. .`,t''::::,,,,,,,,,1,-..:-.'',:„.,‘.,. ':,'",'- ..,.',:4',.":pl..,•'''..',q,--;;',;J'..:-,I'..:ti'-,,,i-.,:'Z;5,'-,q-:;:'•';'''-0..r.- :'.1.4-' '', ''.1',',.'-'''-;:',:..4...:•! ..".-:;''''';';'..';',,...-..;-t-'- ''. •••T'''..:-.'• '' ':'..•' ' '! .' '"-''''': ''--' :' ' : .' '- '- • . 1 a. : ,. .. , •, .. ..:'',-'.:1"..i3'...; .:' ,' .. .P,1.-•,--..;:.:;10 ?-,•1/4,;.;•0,.i....,,"...,.;."'• , ,t, , ,,!...t......... '1 ' • ..."' '' ti''. .' ''..- ''''''-'-'''*ii.i;le'S`,%;‘2•;,;1.@''9.:..1'';';,;.4;.;'.'"''4.''',' ' : '''S-,": '• '''''' ', ,i,'•,.;'`,"-',;,.'..,',',,,',i..:-,-:''":-z,'..:2,. .?.*,, "..„.' ':'4.;..‘.4•.'''•••• e,.,.:: .." _.,... ;,...:!.,,;,... .. _..: .L.. rs,, ' • ...i%t!-Ofi.,:, .;',4.%•1..q4^.:.:i.,;•,‘":'• ' •- '-•,• ,;,',-.-.,-.4:,,, n',.-"...""..;.f..'''',',"Vg,..1.-:,,,;N-z .;‘:-..:,.f'3,:,:;. ,.',,-;,,',;',V"..,'''s'i,V;CT.' ,.,.', . ":-:•-„:' ,,.--•,'., • •T,F,,?'..,:ii",„'4-',/,:,Azt/i0;,,k,;.ti .,:ii?,,','.. -; L,! ': 'S'i'',,::`.,:.,1.:`,'.,%'''if•:!',.,,,r ;e.ft-3,„i,.:-,0";:,,l':,"%,.,'"i.'‘;';'i4)-.21'; ;,:i1;V",V,'04'...;;;'..,',.,"'4:',"'il'.. . j;'. ,.;•;;; ;,',..:'-.::?,,•,-.,'t.,'.,`:''''h''.t'::-'.•• •-•.:-... ., ',::-.•,e.'. '-•. .. '- '• ' ' ' '''' • 'tik:.6'4,'I't:-.'.#P,'00..*;•".;:f,"i;!''''•:,,;-'''-';'•:-•';.. --': '' T ': -'-''''''''''''''"'''-'4,'''-',"'N,,.:'"',•*. ...'''..,.q .'''.:::.-i-IW V,,„i•PS,C'••,•.„1.,.'1-:''.•':','Yrf.'...,';‘,'-': .'., ' ' '.k,';:,... ' .,, • •• ‘. . , .,•, , li•l•-4),!-.:,,,,,,,,,,)„!.A.•,;',....•,.`:''';'. ..•';,,,,;...,,• „-- ., .,„•••,-.,....,,J.•'.:,',.,,-;..";,.:p 5.„,;.:',`,!. .."•',.,"..,;,..,,,,`, ,' . •,;'.•':,..,•''''..C.•;',.'";',',,,,.' .. ,'• '',.: , .. ';. , . . , ,.. , .,, ... •, ',.:4-'0,3i..:.T/.,..,:;',':'',,;...--1-',':',:-;:, -.;,,:' „•," : ',;•,',.;',.'...":`•-,4:,7".!:•;;106'.'!',`4.,...;•4.,:,t,,,:..';,.., 1';I:...•-,4,1.7,, ,'''',,',:".':,:"4-,"='!;‘,"e•::.:- •'' . ' '"; -',I','::' -1.' '• ,.. . . _ v.,loA,,i;:A",•,,-,';',. ..:.."-•: .:.. ....,•''' - , • ,- , ::-; r..?1':•,-- •2.:"'"`''.. ',.i.w.'-i.:-',"::'''',-"...'•: '.••• ':.:::'•....7-ir,•:'-',:''. . . . . • . 7,! :kY:g i,b'45y.,,,01.,,..b, -.":.,,• I- , " , ! .' :*;• .) ri'..;.:.^','''‘T":,'-',-;,•••r:;';,'‘,''.7, J'2,..0.,•'',",e-e,'',,!,."''••,',...11;'.14j'A:'?•'!.:.‘.:'%',''','",,,.. . '.",.:.' ';,', ''.,... ". • , .'.• * %g ,*,..•,, ,::.•, ' . ... .‘.; .. ,,' .gei.'it. , ,•Al- ,'.,1• .,' .f. i., ., ,i.;,'‘:3i ' ,1:;1 .,1,:;:'..,". '' , :•' '.':" -- r • TOTAL , •••', _ /._r...'; '7)1 A.-... ,... ... . .'..„ •,, •'..,' .4.:.‘,•*,!i•.-.0844,4.,•;." •it•,T NA:•',Y.-:,•'",,,,-0•,';: y:• •••••::••.'"•',!••••.4 `F1'.V:aY'.;:','" ;•-;::"''-'''''::;:"'s.:••'-': j•''''•'';''''''.''';'''''' '• '''•' ' ' ' 4t.gt;',741Ria:;'''''..?•‘'. ,:•,-.',." .-.. ;''',;.''.:•,:.:::',',:r'.".,;•,ai,',',•'.i•,••fi':/,ii.::•,.,"V.:10.';'•X:-'..;-':. --"*Ok;' '4,; •? ::••:'' !.94,0".1• I:••""'•'• "•••T ;',.:•,',.?•...!::'•::? „••• '.-' ''•• ' ,...,:;'..;,,-,' ...,, •: .•::, .':',,:-.: •,'.: ':' Vt,,4,1p,..;',,.,',..;,.:..,:-'):` ,,,, ,",', ,,„... . ,,. •..:7,..'4,1'?, j,,:;,s.";1;.,',;',./1-....'"'11.,:.'.1 a,5.,."41''i':":'....":4,:,,r.',',:`,`:.',1 ,,,t,til;‘,.,„1,.,.-.1..;,..,,,..,.,. ' :. . •,..'....•,' .;,•,. .• , igi.f.;...);:,vfx..-',.1.,:,.-..,. ',,- ,-.. .7,;.,.r.,-,,,,.,..,iT,..;,:,...4,....,...- .,:,-,:h..,?,...„,...,:i.,„-i.,,,‘1,, ,,t.:,,,,,.,=.',,:.. .,.-::,-.,;;:, GWEN'`,1''• •MARSH F I NAN,CE: I RECTOR,•.:.,`,. , „' ..,--,,,e,,,,,,,-,,,fw'iA''.••-.1.N.;-,•''•',.•••'•••.•'. •• .. '-• •r•.:.'.'••1•••:'.,4•?:••••$-•..:•,i,';,-k-v..0.•,,:-.t,:t•,-,:.;,:•.'?:r•F,,•1,4,:-.;-.:;:;h.;r•':.,-;•-:..-,..;,•:,,,.•,„ • ,. .•,-. , . .- . , ,t4g,•‘-,,-i:--,1•,•••-,••4-4,,,,, !-,r,,^•.:•;••.• ,. • - . .:''.,,, -,•;,4P.:',-14.!-,4,14,•;•',.:•;-.,,,: t:',,%,..-,,p,„•,':,..fpl,,,?,.,?...,41.,••-.:,-,,Y,-;,•,:•7•••••-•,1-..,,,;•:••,--1-.?:,•,/,..- -,'...„w..•.: •", • . ' i•- • ' • ' ' •• •' - •.:'•:,`!'"'•',,,,-?-. ,,'''..,,;• .i.,44014,11,--••• ••.:•..11-,1-z-*, i'•--:','1,,-',-'„c'',.:''.• ,7;- ..''sw.. -t,0', , ,.. , . .": •.'',, , . . ..:,,:;BY'"'' ' ,_„,%",%':„../ji '':.'': . 'ife. 11S4a,'..;-"f-:..: .•- ': •'..f,Prit•ilA'-'1,-?-'':'4-•-j.." •-•'•. •--•'-• -:' :'•-••'',.• ‘..„'''4;4 '4,'"•••-•;•2''.' ,,,;4,t, ',' ,,• , ••?;•,44 t_'44.,-,-' L••,.r:,,‘ ' 1' : --,•, „ ..,&. '4.t Pifil..,,r1'.:,l',..e,'' .- .•'..• ''..' '. ' ''•''''''''O.'''.' '•''''",‘•:4:', F;,.i'',',,Ai,-...,".yr•:•.0 4;1.,,,,,,:-;:,:,,..,,,,,,-,.,.,-,..,,.k,,,,e:',1.1,,,, ,, ';17:-..!,!::•.,!:"- 4',/4 45'1\14'.7, X''',',,Vil;,5,1•j '•,•,9;',:;',•-• 4:',.:',',,,j:nf:1:.,'.t,:•, ,,ctI,4;'?4,si-Z,•:4,V.,•;; Vg,44,4:14,;W'$'4Vrr,5:ki ";;',%'' ,14.',f,'•,:4''••'' ',i''.'"•';"14/,'4i54);;;','"f•:T4')''' •-':', . '' ''.' '•:',', •', ' , .•; ' ,;,' '4;1,,;',•.',.,,';•4,'t,;,‘: ,: ,4 4,:.,:•,;.-'4,';'-ir, 0:47jElt:P''''k':'''''''. .?•'....::;••4'4'•' •• ' ,,,...,4,m ,,, , ui,kv4.1 ' - ..i.ic.,, ,- ‘kw..4.z..,,,,.„(„,.,::,.::, =:-.,,,:,,-,;,,, ,,,y.:-.,,:.:1.; .,,:..,,,. ,s 4,,,,,ai:,,,,,,,5,•,-.4•?,m,.:Itg:,•44 ;-,:::,,,,,;,•,,,-.7. : ,,,,,, i.,t,,:,-...,:,,,V,T,t4,,v,irk-ffA4,..,,i,.X,., ,fiZtlgt71.14,y;ti^1-kki/.;03Arlit,; 11.4441,,Orl..'.• 6'','S.,.':•0:‘:Pr:'N'1,7r;.;;',1, L",•-..'-''-',.'.. ":,4"`',,,': il:•,.:.!''7.' . ''' .: '''. .'' ",!!- '"4-' ..1.''•-:--'''1- 17eAK,44;00'..i'.7.-?.:0...;:.‘,....,••.,.;. ..';`...„.•..7:, . , V . ,wra4k.4 ,,•;', .. . ,.,!•,t. „t6,-...,... ,,,,,,,,i .,..,,,,3..,, ,.1e,•-:.• ,,,,.., '-,,.;.•:-,.,,.• .:.!; ;,,,•,,,,,, , 1-").o' sv..Api..sv:y1,-•.;',..,....1'.-''J'etiv.,`•:,t.•,..,..".,_-':•..,,,, ?' .:,,i.,,f1...,f,a71A)",, •1. 4.4 A':41-',., iNys:•61.'MPA''tk'454-;':t'',,i',;' ",''.1i6x"..'414-' ,',Yia'';•iii/::''...-f"'‘'X`:,%'.1:'CA01''.' ;'c'', '-;':•- .P•'='''1'•'''''''':'':"'i'':' ''' ' ''' '' ''''. ' '''':' ±,k7i,,14.4,s•bts.;iz,vikk,y,.,:.;A.i,,,,>. :•, ...,:q„....,,,,,....•4 k•-.5'. Y 3 ,,,g,,.;•••.-,q1:4,.4y, /,:4•444,14,r0:;44,.'4.,-A.,-....-(,.f.:':4,,..&.144-1F-, :N;..-A--fr,-;;•:,,?,-,,N..:,:..:::::-.;-'"..-f-`.1P,•`:',-'• , ,'-''• . ,--:;-•-•-',••7--;',.'•':.-:'-g• ••••••••,--'f.!,.4.:'-',' -',',-.-•`'-'•,.,%••-:,,-"',;•.:-:,', .•• • ,- .';.'.:.;'...`'---, ::,‘.7..t•'.C.'• ',•-,+1' -,:;•WIT;,;?tc•44,, O ; ltg.g.,30,-. , ?!,!..:i..-9.,...g4i*, ,- ,rJ ., ...,,:f,l'e:::4,3 -,''. -,,-: ',, : ,. `,w,,..-.:.,',:::,,Y,-,,...',,_:-,...:.,,..,,',.:.;,:;?;,:,.%;,.:;;;,,,:;,,,,' ,kc,zij,P.ik,,t'te.it4t,'"wp:'.%7,--'-;',.'',.,-,:A';::':.:,;'.-',:,,,-:,..,.*'ql.;izm'Itvo.Ni,fip*,.,*404;qArd,'?or: ,'inl'rP,,WA,V,r6e;g,i.Ltfi:,:.,::-'i'.',',?:::.*Pf.;-:o.*';O' z:::-''-c,---i•':;.'t::;••••-•'`::.1:::'::',±;"''.'. r:•-::':'•`1-'''',..--,'-r;-"•''-5•:::'';;'P• '•-'4-• ' ' '.N.-Viv,cc,•;%t••-1.-'•' :-.7,-..'":“?'•'; •-,...;:,:-•*,.-.•?;,---:'•11,-7. •!*:. ,V'.'•'';ALN:c+t,',:_ti,,,".•1'..•:•ft".-!;•,?,-;gA-,,3::•.!.4:---ti'lq..-a-.1V),f;14•••,sbA:',2',.14-i's,-,'-.-0..,',. 4,•:',•,_'•j.3.-.• ,...-:.,, •;.,-t ,. ;•,.;,-, ,,.,--;' .....,,...-..;;.- .. -i,•...-,;.,,,..;,-;-,,_.:0•;-N•-,.•'.: , .2A teaffi,.-?4-"P!.....‘..,-, :',,I4.;-.•-::•,..:','••:.,..,-1, : ,,,:•,-:,:::-:•.',;;. r,4M,"..:%t.1-,id.-'?;-z'•'r'Z'A•o.V,°.iel','•••,!•''s,r„ •eEi,5;t•t;':WtZiksi,•:,*d,,,:'::!-AOV•$'k'gy:•'.i;••t:"?::,'":','-',41,,,7:1----,,'•11•-•':,..:''::.•-•-:.,.' . :' '',: '•.:.•;,i,:,•:-'',-"•'..•' ••-•!•••;',,',.•,4--f.,';',;1'.:•,•'- ,- ',., ,:,,,:v„:,1•,,•,_, .,,.-..,„ -•-, .,:N.,-, , 4 ,,i ,•,40..,,N-•,:-.1:•,-.:,.:,,?0,,,, ,....!•-•,:r.--, -,;•:•-t,l,•-p'..--,,V,•, ,Y.-,,,,••••f.,,,,,..•-,;', ••••':,•,•;..., •-.'•!, ,.••-:':••,'": •,. •"`•,.' .-, ,•-.- • '`' -: ",' .- ' :' •-,-. '•,'"'- :. - E` L'AN�EI;.PowELL,M.O'SS;,`&`MILLER GEOR GE'V.POWELL KINNE F.HAWES GORDON'W.MOSS , ' MARK E.JOHNSON •''IPENDLETON MILLER. •- G.VAL TOLLEFSON ' :RAYMOND W.,HAMAN'• -,A7T,QNEY$,.A _•LAW, - JAMES.L.ROBART , •1 ' -WILLIAM J.WALSH,JR." '•. ' : .. - , C.WILLIAM BAILEY r,G.,KEITH GRIM 8'300 RAINIER;BANK TOWER EVAN O.THOMAS III 'WIL:BUR J.LAWRENCE MICHAEL E.MORGAN D.WAYNE GITTINGER Y R.MICHAEL SMITH BARRY H.BIGGS _ -' • SEATTLEI WASHINGTON`96101 JAMES B.STOETZER . RICHARD F.ALLEN JULIE BROOKS MURRAY THOMAS S.ZILLY •• (206)223-7000 DAVID G.JOHANSEN ,ROBERT W.THOMAS - MICHAEL H•RUNYAN HARTLEY PAUL DEBORAH 0 WRIGHT •• , , • JOHN F.SHERWOOD CABLE EMBE TELEX 32-8808 DALE W.HOUSE DAVID C.LYCETTE RICHARD C.S1EFERT ROBERT U.FREDERICK • ' LARRY S.GANGNES _ MATTHEW R.KENNEY " STEPHEN J.HILL JOHN R.TOMLINSON . . BRIAN P.ABURANO .. • ROBERT L.ISRAEL COUNSEL... , ANNE MCOONALO ARTHUR W.HARRIGAN.JR. • SUSAN A.SCHMID DAVID DANIELSON W.BYRON LANE • DOUGLAS J-SHAEFFER ROBERT R.DAVIS,JR. WILLIAM•T.JACOBSON BRUCE SHORTS EUGENE R.NIELSON CHARLES R.EKBERG KENYON P.KELLOGG 'J.," y, . ;f•' RALPH H.PALUMBO • October 11_ MICHAEL D.DWYER . 1979 f�]+ CRAIG S.PALMOUIST - ' 2-0`)" 9�C-il�` .,, � i'rt� f}r7-' '.\ NOTICE OF APPEAL `' ` 11.179 ni h.;,- ./RyE C,4� ,1 II Jam"';q, )--. 11111 r,4-`>PifitKl l0 t1CP '' City Council of the City' Renton ` , ,? 200 Mill Avenue S. •1 Renton, WA . 98055 . ' Dear Mayor Delaurenti 'and Members of the City Council : On behalf of our clients, Kohl Excavating, Inc. and Ivan C. Christianson, and pursuant to Section 4-3016 of the Code of • General Ordinances of the City of Renton, we submit this appeal of .the decision- of Land Use Hearing Examiner, Fred J. Kaufman, dated, .September '27, 1979. That decision concerns our clients ' request to rezone his property .and concerns file nos. R-392-79 and SP-407-79. We believe Mr. Kaufman' s failure to recommend approval of the request to rezone our clients ' property - from R-1 to R-3 was attributable to an error in judgment. We have enclosed a check'. in the amount of $25.00 payable to • the City Clerk,,; for the fee required in. connection with this appeal. Please contactthis office, as well as Mr. G. L. Jackson, the appellants. environmental designer, when the hearing date on this matter has been scheduled. The appellant feels 'that the hearing examiner made the following errors in judgment: 1. Conclusion 1. ' is in error. The appellant did demonstrate -that the request for' reclassification was appro- • priate. The testimony of Wayne Kappenman in opposition to the proposal conceded ,.that there had been an increase in , traffic on S,R-90O Since-the last rezone of the property in April of 1978. In addition,, Mrs. ' Texeira testified 'con cerning the - construction of new housing in the area, which, would add to. the traffic problem. This, change, when con- , sidered along with the'. fact that the site, unlike the - . r) ••°`, '+.,jr•,Yiii.,:,...vr y:S.f:t .r -61 nt•:,'. - ' A' 1 Ff:•iy.4,•75.'.+;v .aJ,a,:;E')^.'•`.y..,:...i 1'> • Sl�r:V.- :.SG'�t's•wa"iw �.w:�lye`:ti." .i;+ :)Ci�y - • Renton City, .0 u �. �: October ��.�•ice':..", y,l,.,� � Y; ' 'Page- Two' w: ;`:rt..,os�• • 4C. " surrounding residential areas, lies at the same elevation as S.W. Sunset Boulevard, justifies a,; rezone of the site at this time. The appellants';'representative, Mr. Jackson, and Mr. Blaylock of the:-;Planni'nT Department both testified that the impact of the, .traff'ic_.noise on residences constructed on the site would be l k'ely•;to:,.give rise to localized urban blight. This danger' •is contrary,;.;to;: the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, in particular to.,.the; concept of providing a buffer be- tween existing,. residential neighborhoods and S.W. Sunset Boulevard. 2 . Conclusion 2. is in error. The site is surrounded on 3 sides by existing single family residences. However, with one or two, exceptions, those houses are shielded from the traffic lights and,' congestion on S.W. Sunset Boulevard by both distance and: elevation: . The rezone of the site to R-3 is logical and s.consistent with the goals of. the Comprehensive Plan. It will :prevent,. ,the "blight" 'described in 'goal 1. , which appears. at page,;11 of the plan and 'which is quoted by the hearing examiner:;inn his 2nd ..conclusion. The appellants proposal is also consistent with goal 6. of the Comprehensive 'Plan as quoted by the hearing examiner. Development of the!, subject property as seven residential sites is not in 'the ,;best+..interest,of the community... . , particularly , the interests„ of the ;residents of those seven dwellings. The residents of ing1e family dwellings on the site would be ' constantly bother.•efd'- *the. -lights•, ,noise and fumes created by .the traffic,on;v;S.W, .S unset, Boulevard. The •,appellant and the Planning Department;,:believe .these .':conditions would cause high turnover ,'and give -rise low cost, poor quality housing, which would_bey,.likelyi to.. rapidly ,deteriorate and ,decay. In addition, :,the':children living in those seven houses would be in ',close:, proximity to the high speed traffic on S.W. Sunset Boulevard, ;'a 'danger which would.-not exist if the site were rezoned and developed as a 13,000 sq ft,. .medical pro- fessional ,'bu'i.ld y<. .;_ ng:� Contrary:,to the hear ,ng examiner'' s conclusion, the appell- ant asserts .that ait has",demonstrated -that the proposed rezone advances the policies }set forth in °;the Comprehensive Plan. • 3• Conc1 usiori 4:. s' also in ;error. The -appellant did show that_'the;:;,proposed';,rezone . and' 'clinic':is in the best 2=1/4` ` interests of.,zthe ,urrounding-, community and ,'that, it would further the `publ c.:;welfare Sone';,,of. the neighbors who . testi- fied complained that thea.r childrenmust walk to school without 4,. "qC , ... ' ., .,....•:;Y',. :.ice`. .. . - .. - - Renton it -Counc ']:•''a ::.��; -- - � , a.,A,,, October 11";' 7 :",` ,'��;,•.. .� rage Three... :,! °: a ;` �' - ;"•i,-:.::r„ -Pi9' •.t.;'7,C� 1'' '• 1;: the benefit of. 4`sidewalkss':or.'''curbs on existing streets. However, nothing in the'-,recordz°,•;'shows neighborhood children actually I walk down ''81st Avenue: a: . and S.W. ,3rd ,Place towards Sunset while going. `.to:•:an:d:,: from: srchool: In,:fact, the local elementary '' school is to:the .North=_and- away: 'f rom;'the site. The record does show that .the ,'safetyof: pedestrians- along 81st and S.W. 3rd Place would 'be enhanced•'by�'the, development of the site. • :,V , "' .Traffic ,Operations Entg i ieer Paul.;Lambert testified that curbs , Y ,, gutters and .sidewalkswould; be required on three :sides of 'the proposal. The proposed development would not 'increase traffic in the surrounding residential areas because clients and ` . patients of the proposed` -medical' professional building would have no reason=•to 'drive iany-. 'further than 250 feet up 81st, Avenue S. to 'one''of the',`two entrances to the ,parking lot. That route only passes'.:3, existing dwellings. The record also 'shows that there would;..`only"be,; a..minimal increase in the existing traffic dangers along:S W,';•Sunset'. Poulevard because, as Mr. - Lambert testified,,, no-''lefty:turns: would be permitted across the ••;;.,•'` ' ! median on that",:stre`etThe"hearing -examiner' s conclusion that the proposal would ",greatly` increase traffic on both S.W. Sunset Boulevard;.and through. the. residential neighborhood" is • based upon vague' speculation by••the' neighbors testifying at ' the hearing, rather than on facts and traffic study analysis. ' The proposed medical professional building would provide a much needed buffer tO-the.. ever-increasing traffic and noise from S.W. Sunset, is consistent:;w:ith_ the •'stated goals of the Comprehensive . Plan and, given. the ,usual of the site and the surround- ing neighborhood,, will;:promote` 'the interests of the community j as a whole by avoiding:construction ,of single family dwellings in an area wholly unsuited for that' purpose - - For the' reasons' stated'above, the 'appellant respectfully re- quests that the City .Council reverse the decision of the hearing examiner and adopt :the• -recommendation of the. City, of Renton' s Planning Department by:$approving the' rezone of the subject property from R-ll;to';.R-3., subject to the restrictions set forth • in the Planning Department's Preliminary Report to the hearing examiner. • {: Very truly yours, • LANE, POWELL, MOSS & MILLER . Evan .0. Thomas III EOT:skh cc: Gary L. Jackson Ivan :C.'"Christianson Kohl Excavating, . . 0 F k4, „ .;f YN o THE CITY OF RENTON U / 3' r •.,p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 '"'" ° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 09.o co. FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9'1 () SEP IE c31 Q October 12, 1979 Members, Renton City Council, Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-392-79, SP-407-79; Kohl & Christianson Addition; Request for Rezone and Special Permit; Appeal. Dear Council Members: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation, dated September 27, 1979, regarding the referenced application was forwarded to Council members on October 4, 1979 and scheduled for placement on the City Council agenda for October 22, 1979. On October ll, 1979, an appeal was filed with th'e City Clerk within the 14-day appeal period. A copy of.the' appeal letter- is attached for your review prior to rescheduling of the application on the City Council agenda of • November 5, 1979. . If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the office of the Hearing Examiner. Sincerely, - 64 Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment . • Ot. . R�� • • A. ' „ o THE CITY OF RENTON • •• U' `� ® 2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • LAND USE .HEARING EXAMINER "90 . `0• • FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 • 0,9gT.0 SEP� 4# October 4, 1979 Members, .Renton City Council , • Renton,• Washington ' . RE: File No. R-392-79, SP-407-79; Kohl & Christianson Addition; Request .for Rezone and Special Permit. Dear. Council Members:: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the • • referenced rezone and special permit-applications, dated September 27, 1979:. The appeal period for the application expires. on October 11, 1979, and the report. is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven day period from the date of , publication. The complete file will be transmitted' to the City Clerk on October 12, 1979, and will be placed on the Council agenda on October 22, 1979. ' Because the Examiner has•recommended denial of the application, if the Council concurs in that recommendation, no legislation will be required. • If you require additional. assistence or information regarding this • matter, please contact our office. , Sincerely, . 4N.1.1....-.. .\(3i0i-e------ . Fred J. Kau an Hearing Examiner . cc: Planning Department • City Clerk • Attachment • • • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) • County of King ) Marilyn, J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 27th day of September , 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. (OU Subscribed and sworn this Ct "day of Se6ceol,' 19 `t(i Notary Public in and fcrr,'',t} . ..atE ` of Washington, residingAt ., onl ( Ct Application, Petition or Case: Kohl & Christianson; R-392-79, SP-407-79 (The mina tee contain a tint the paktie4 o f necond) 6(/- PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 18 , 1979 APPLICANT: KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION FILE NUMBERS : R-392-79 , SP-407-79 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests a rezone from R-1 to R-3 and the approval of a special permit to allow the development of the site with a professional office structure . The applications were submitted together to specifically limit the rezone use to a professional office building . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : IVAN C . CHRISTIANSON 2 . Applicant: KOHL EXCAVATING , INC . 3. Location : Property located between 80th Avenue South and S . W . 3rd P1 . ; north of S . W. Sunset Blvd . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of the Property : Approximately ± 1 . 3 acres . 6 . Access : Via S .W . Sunset Blvd . 7 . Existing Zoning : R-1 , Residence Single Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R-1 , Single Family Residence District 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Low Density Multi -Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on August 24 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on August 23 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site and the surrounding area was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance #2913 dated February 10 , 1975 . It was rezoned to the present R-1 classification by Ordinance #3206 on April 15 , 1978 . D. PHSYICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site has a gentle slope of approximately ( 1 ) to two (2 ) percent from the north to the south . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , File Nos : R-392-79 SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 SP-407-79 PAGE TWO 2 . Soils : The site consists of Beausite gravelly sandy loam (BeC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid . Available water capacity is low. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of erosion is moderate . This soil is used for timber and pasture and for urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The majority of the site consists of light brush and grass . Minor amounts of scrub brush and bushes are also evidenced on the site. 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation of the site is sufficient to provide a suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: Prior to filling the site it appears that an intermittent stream crossed from north to south near the easterly one third of the site . It appears that surface drainage has been controlled as part of the fill operation . Even though there i-s no sign of a stream or surface water on the site at the present time , a high ground water table is probable because there were no drainage improvements constructed with. the fill . 6. Land Use : The site is currently in an undeveloped state. To the southwest , it abuts S .W. Sunset Boulevard , an extremely busy arterial . The surrounding area consists primarily of older single family residences . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The subject site is located in a marginal older single family residence neighborhood . The development of the site may have potential . spill -over effects in helping to upgrade the surrounding area . F. PUBLIC SERVICES : ' 1 . Water and Sewer : An existing 6 inch water main is located along N . W. 3rd Place near the northeast corner of the subject site . An 8 inch sewer main exists along S .W. Sunset Boulevard . 2 . Fire Protection : Fire protection is provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any future develop- . ment of the site will be subject to the City of Renton standards . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route No . 107 operates along S . W . Sunset Boulevard within one block of the subject site. 4 . Schools : The site is within one-half (1) mile of Earlington Elementary School , three-quarters (3/4 ) of a mile of Dimmitt Junior High School , and within one ( 1 ) mile of Renton High School . 5 . Parks : There are no recreational parks in the area . G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-709A, R-3 , Medium Density Multi -Family Residence District. 2 . Section 4-706 , R-1 , Residence Single Family District . 3 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading . 4. Section 4-725 , Amendments . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 , and objectives pages 17 and 18 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , Files Nos : R-392-79 SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 SP -407-79 PAGE THREE I . IMPACT UPON NATURAL SYSTEMS : The rezoning the property will not a direct impact on the natural systems . However, the proposed development of a professional office building on the site will disturb present soil and vegetation conditions , increase storm water runoff, and add to the noise and traffic levels . These conditions may be minimized by the application of proper development controls . J . SOCIAL IMPACTS : The development of the site for professional uses will not increase social interaction with the established single family residential area . K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . L . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENT CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. M . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The Comprehensive Plan provides limited specific guidance concerning the development of the site . The map element of the Comprehensive Plan is only a guideline for development and must be used in reference to the actual nature of the neighboring properties . Approximately 25% of the subject site was designated for low density multiple family develop- ment to provide a buffer from Sunset Blvd. West for the established single family residential areas on top of the surrounding hills . This relationship of Sunset Blvd . West , the surrounding single family development , the access , and the sites topographic setting does not support the develop- ment of the subject site with single family residences . Based on the unique characteristics the applicant has submitted a rezone request from R-1 to R-3 along with an application for a special permit to limit the development of the site to a professional office building . A special permit does not limit the use of the property within a specific zoning classification . A special permit is normally granted to allow a use in addition to those allowed outright . The only method that the City can require that is effective is the filing of restrictive covenants . 2. The present traffic volumes and noise levels along Sunset Blvd . West suggest that the site developed with single family residences would not be complimentary to the established single family residential area . The seven new residences would probably be of lower market value because of their location and thus would have a higher potential to develop into an area of localized blight . Residential objectives stated on page 17 of the Land Use Report , Renton Comprehensive Plan suggest that " residential and other exclusive districts " should be pro- tected from the unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses . In this case , the addition of more single family residences would be considered as " incompatible" unless most PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , File Nos : R-392-79 SEPTEMBER 18 , 1979 SP-407-79 PAGE FOUR of the property was used as a visual and sound buffer . In addition , Objective #6 , page 18 , would apply . Its specific intent is to "encourage the ,- development and utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which to work , shop , live and play. " Development of an area that has a high potential for decay is not in the best interest of the City or the neighbor,hood . Thus the primary justification for the Hearing Examiner recommending a zoning classification of R-1 for the property (R-114-77 ) is not appropriate if the potential single family residential development is not compatible with the existing single family residential and does not meet the intent of providing a buffer between Sunset Blvd . West and the existing single family residential area . In fact , the Hearing Examiner did not specifically address any of the potential problems of developing a single family residential subdivision on the subject site . 3. The proposed used of the subject site as a professional office building to provide a buffer to the established single family residential areas is consistent with the Compre- hensive Plan . This would appear to indicate that the requirement of Section 4-3014 (A)2 has been met . 4 . The professional office building as proposed would have approximately 13 ,000 square feet on two floors with 67 parking spaces . The site plan attempts maximum use of the site with a 20 foot setback of the building from Sunset Blvd . and a 5 foot landscaping strip between the parking lot and Sunset Blvd . This location adjacent' to Sunset Blvd . with its heavy traffic volumes necessitates additional setbacks and landscaping along this street for buffering and separation of uses . 5 . The intended use as a professional office building allows a variety of potential users from doctors to real estate people . Access and traffic volume is critical to any development of this location . Plus some professional office would possibly result in more than just a daily use . Real estate offices could be open late into the evening , while a medical office would tend to limit itself to more of an 8 a . m. to 5 p .m. work day . N . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : The staff recommends based .on the above analysis that the Hearing Examiner approve and recommend to the City Council the approval of the rezone as requested , File No . R-392-79 , from R-1 Single Family Residential to R-3 , Multiple Family Residential subject to the following conditions to be established .as restrictive covenants running with the land : 1 . The only permitted use of the site is for a medical professional office building . 2 . Setbacks - No building or structures shall be permitted within (a ) forty (40 ) feet from S . W . Sunset Boulevard (State Road #2 ) ( b ) within thirty (30) feet of the northerly property line ; within thirty ( 30) feet of S . W . 3rd Place ; and within thirty (30 ) feet of 80th Avenue South . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , File Nos : R-392- 79 SEPTEMBER 18 , 1979 SP-407-79 PAGE five 3 . Landscaping/Buffer Areas - The first thirty (30 ) feet adjacent appropriately to the northerly property line shall be to provide a dense evergreen screen . The firstfifteen a ( 15 ) aped feet adjacent to S . W . Sunset Boulevard , and the first ten ( 10) feet adjacent to S . W . 3rd Place and 80th Avenue South shall be appropriately landscaped . Detailed landscape plans for the entire site development shall be submitted to and approved the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development review. 4. Height Limitation - Building or structure shall exceed a height of twenty-five (25 ) feet . 5. Access to the site shall be controlled with signed traffic safety along Sunset Boulevard and potential impacts to the adjacent residential streets . The staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the request for a special permit as well , File No : SP-407-79 , subject to the above conditions . \\\1 ..;'" '� / ( L cry •2, a O `` . ice - Ri� t..l` ilf.+l `• 4' �i�O +a , i9�f �•_ " }1, tIlk — \ -- ..,..)-1! f. " ?-..a•C4 , ., , 144.. .• , •i dice—R y.— r. 1~�v '�, ',C...';',. f• I ` } Y I 1,11:1ate• {aru' .1 ,r' ashol , ,4 7. ,c,.,,,, ,, ii,..1/40 ' p I Ni? .• 1J 7�j�� ltif �,l- L�.L_ .L 1 i � _ - • '�' 1 1 � 4 mg �?'iii ' _-� 7a ra I LIT;'.]7I 1 I I F i' I i i I i LUT Ti1 I 1 1 , T"`�C''7— .' �i _ e• ` o. • I' ,J I I ,t ,1.1 ! ?+I I43 ' { � 40 I f 1 I , 0. rl , 4 Z � L I g � 4 qI I �' \I ,\:, I 4�' °+1. W - ,i _ V�^ .t�"..'"'i3 I • � I1, °I, I••, It I `, iiii: 5 ��at 40Ei :"'•t,i 6 °fI, l._J l�_� `.I _ .- :1_ .c�J ' i ��t��•VVVV Id �- Ir 1f, it� I �.� 5 �I Lyf I [4tiGs 17 r1.••1-'41 j I 1I.4b `t'el\.I\: i1 a t-� .1, 4� p - 1 ,�� ' 11 _, I. • , , I I pt 1 �'v I x °IYs I. ; ,1 x j I. t : N' \ • 1 x .° I . • I n.-.F � --� f r i ',T --`��-_ 1 ZIZ I b.`� i , 1 • I�i \'1.y \ "itm , I ;+. 1 r� Ir 1 -1_ _ a%;... . a I{ 1,1 t 1. \ 2lI zi0, 1 ,.r\I fZ- \k 4 J. 1 f 1 I I `r•-,_ _T C(T OF•. II i ♦ 4-.1--- 4-_�S.."_ p L—i_—__.a—._r-4-4_L.__ AI__ 1___k _ 1\. • .i Iyt O01 41 - • It i, I• I, i♦ , I3 jI'1-T-I-SEq rTLE •I Z •.,zIS oOI•`1 ,'• ° • r1,r_t -, _ ` �� \ m ' i 1 \ . 1 2 I I,.I•. I s 1 ,I t 1 1 T__T �� P = Yrh. I // `PI,' ,-` 1,1"," 0' I �y \ ,.\ - i 1 Liti � � I I f"� - ,___ �� ' , tl I •tL._ r(;��r,.'0� TY -L ae`jy-`Ly: y.'� �'� �r , Trir,,44---_.---, - 4. :II 7-7-,-.__1"-----. 1 , • - R - p ' . ;,�y�.-- .jT Th 1 lu�,�` j 1,r-" c�'y 'r�/� 'r.,I,=(;.�,•{ rt° (f' "y�' t 1 l0, r p �=- - - ---=y _ ?�l Ili: ;?� v I, �ky1� ;/ ��rf•., le a _ --q-RaTti +-�. •l'0//!%;Q��r .r t '� 7 0R�r /1/ �E,+L ,j,1 -" ''r } �- 1 \\ gla'p7,t1-r --ix,• I}//�77 -,,,,,7 .l 1� i p, m7 1. /„ l'f'44:,. ig: ! y /3 n i ti�N 3i*nwrxn,+,,,a+a+kt.,,,,...•\ N ,1 ./ ,Qr' t , „ \ 1 I \\` - ' `s -SET ©LVD GG1I�� -- •--- - - \ , 1 z -2-- ... ,_f-. r ,-P' _ /. f gyp°' Jppppp :7A,? T'',." ' 'i.. / l i �7 is ` • • / G • 1 ../ ,--. ,. i � •. . • x KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION f R-392-79 SP-407..79 4 1- f APPL 1 CANT KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION TOTAL AREA ±1.3 acres Via S.W. Sunset Blvd. PRINCIPAL ACCESS ___� ____ 1 E x i S1 I Nc; ZONING_ R-1, Single Family_Residential Undeveloped I EXISTING USE p j PROPOSED USE Professional Office Structure COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multi-Family 1 i COMMENTS 1I+ 1 : ' - •-�-^shy-svar.::w,�_.ssrssea seevtaver-n-cra m.arnytr ,tr•<:rn.,.-_-ms-r r=3,=3:rea•r_•rra xarnzc+t:.,zSas:.x�ea,:�as' ..xrarsrr` ms '. DEVE[ MENT APPLICATION REVIEW 5 - ET Application : ____48o LZ- 1 Location : ati, .540005S / 0° az01 Applicant : ®b� � c pi ,!..d .wootta � 12411 TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 5/47571 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING (IV3/ 79 • Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering • 13Ai ding Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department IN OM I II PJ PFS O(FSTIQNS R GARDIUEVTHIJSCOVFEREA� ON SHOULD PROVIDED 1HE LIC lIO �! E (ARC) TO 3E HELD ON it `?9 AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE I , F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO • ATT5NRGTHE AR ARC,P EAS PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Fire_ Approved . \/ Approved with conditions Not Approved 6c•,/%Yc: ',-7,7/.ciS , /eZ4',.ce/irC47. %/ SG' ,4 in-/5 �.�c�.�/�✓c" Cai�,S;2,�c�iie,(z, /`/k"E /?/Li/J e-c/ /cis' :>tJ i.�•e 7��u�f 7iG.Z% 4S /'2`3: lira `�� C.ric ii✓�-z`��^� i-2cc-'u c,e Oc(/ 1-14:eS itG LI/L.) G /-1 ?- rE -� Co;:>c- nCc_ �t • (c)/57-7 7 Signature of Director or uthori • Representative Date • .... REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved j" (�Cit,e.r,2vt' TJ V`?i;E i Fi/ti: {NF',0"0S poSSidi,e' 0172- c po.cL;:tj ON G%{ SCL..i'L v41,l N 0 � 1 ignatury of Director or uthorized Representative Date DEVT flPt1ENT APPLICATION REVIEW EET Application : /96ZO,44 zyir Location : 49 Applicant : TO : Pars Department - SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :, �1d1175? Police Department Ao IL C. MEETING 8/ 1,f 75P • Public Works Department _ Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department INPI�I�I� N P�F(S.�?G��ETApvLIC��I�fJI �GT �s, nppl_ CAT •or sHouLD PROVIDED , 47( EVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO PE HELD ON 1 79 _ AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE UU�:� F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATT N THE ARC, •EASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTSTO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: UG ,,P PM ON 7 . _ ;I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved Sianature_o-f Director'or ;uthorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved, �� Approved with conditions Not Approved ,9& J3 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date - - - --- - - -- �, %.a-LILaLtve • DEVEV MENT APPLICATION REVIEW : ET . Application : iZ® (R3Y7? PT:1--iFTT� 1 Location : OA 45 " sJ - fSc 6V vc.. ' $ �`�� Applicant : Ko ii etidiol e TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :,_ /1/J7g Police Department A, R. C. MEETING /3'//fl Public Works Department _ Engineering Division 1/ Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department q fFMGRTARAIPIf�EVTEIJSCO'P ICATT�OPJSHOL' D $ PROVIDED �FERENCE (ARC) 10 BE HELD ON7 9 AT 9 :00 AM i F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO IN THE TfiIRD FLOOR CONFEREf�CE ATTEND THE ARC, P EASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TTOI THE WPLANNING BDEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 PM ON , RE VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :/ // Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved • ' . , S: C)2/.--------zz //*/7 Sicinature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :^ j_,< .0 �C —, Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved a) z= crr'„' (. /4%fit,l� �2_ 7 _7 C' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ( l � / j� Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l /. 1 1 i-ii=ic I 11 '� \` ' // ),t ,1 14,4_ •••,,,... ... , a.•IIJ ,, _j�_ _, I . 74- /71_ [-..:. -:.-- ,j, --:-..09,0",41 I 171-.. -.7,)- /T4 4- ;( 9'''' -/'1/' ,. /,,,, , ! , \ ._, 90, . .,�' �\ \\ rr, ._ f'�1-- 7 ... ..)/. '''.11 \\ \ \\E - :1-----...... *. / . . 4"%p ... . 0,3-, . .. l ...frir Mt-- 4- .......... •-• /. P ,* •I \ 01., i__1,,...,..-\\ t:11--- 1 -----:----7--:—.7,'" lb--„„„ .N9) \\. \ 441.- • ''.."..- --.I 1--- ' '\...... • • r 11/ /( .•) •.7 .7 .. -,,b .- : \• ! / > '� \ . \ / /• •'. /7 _ •' %;•.�. •) / /; / _ \ .] ..-�.�, Iyam\�‘ I \\ I II / ,-• I \ ` ' �/ ` !1.j / i.. ' ; a N ;r i 1 ._/' .< /, , N. \ r./ ,, - t / : ., �•)s•\ ./ a j / I / I/, is r/ \ •\ /• � 11 -• ..i./ / f / .,. ,,. i . ,.,„ m . ' \ ' ' �� • .' 1 • I\ r - ' / .: ' \ � )) \\ s• / y. �.% • 1` /c ; '\* '. .. . ' ,./ ) /y V . \ . l• tly 7'......::> 41• W, /.,7, JJ, A' Y/ 4; L /•` 1/ " , . ) ..,...k. 1 , A is, ! :' 1 . •• ... ‘' - • / /ix , ,•0 • t4-1,-...;,,,.W. 4.a li , t. ,/ '.„::.„, ,,:,:.) /l .,, • ...-://c: Cp. \.\•:5 ,\.._.‘,... „ . .....• :.,.,Y--... .,4. A / Jo / e Yj! t,� .,,.... . ., ''' • -,\•• \t‘t„1....)J. .. ! .• . .•) N •N., ' i .4 . ...) ..' ' / Zli i % / ,... - ' I i•; t „,\.7. .: :' >--'1,,,/, ,' 0 .... .,. ".13 ... • / • • /11 i. I--i C:1) ,k../. o a / En 7cnie °Lti; 1x U tT r- u7 1 N a rn x M o I x /FINAL DECLARATION OF ^w " `/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-392-79 SP-407-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 488-79 XE FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Requested rezone from R-1 to R-3 and special permit to allow development of the site with a professional office structure. Proponent KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION Location of Proposal Between 80th Ave So & S .W. 3rd P1 ; north of S .W. Sunset Blvd. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPT. This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by 'the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : Pursuant to attached conditions, in the form of restrictive covenants . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : • Responsible Offi ial GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title P 4 ING RECTO Date SEPTEMBER 14 , 1979 Signatur ` �r City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ' _,CF-488-79 FOR KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION, R-392-79 , SP-407-79 CONDITIONS FOR DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • 1 . The only permitted use of the site is for a medical professional office building . 2 . Setbacks - No building or structures shall be permitted within (a ) forty (40) feet from S . W. Sunset Boulevard ( State Road #2 ) ( b) within thirty (30) feet of the northerly property line ; within thirty (30) feet of S .W . 3rd Place; and within thirty (30) feet of 80th Avenue South . 3. Landscaping/Buffer Areas - The first thirty (30) feet adjacent to the northerly property line shall be appropriately landscaped to provide a dense everJreen screen . The first fifteen ( 15 ) feet adjacent to S . W. Sunset Boulevard , and the first ten ( 10) feet adjacent to S . W. 3rd Place and 80th Avenue South shall be appropriately landscaped . Detailed landscape plans for the entire site development shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development review. 4. Height Limitation - Building or structure shall exceed a height of twenty-five (25 ) feet . 5. Access to the site shall be controlled with signed traffic safety along Sunset Boulevard and potential impacts to the adjacent residential streets . • • • September 27, 1979 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, APPLICANT: Kohl & Christianson Addition FILE NO. R-392-79, • SP-407-79 • LOCATION: Property located between 80th Avenue S. and S.W. 3rd Place north of S.W. Sunset Boulevard. • SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a rezone from R-1 to R-3 and the ' • approval of a. special permit to allow the development of the . site with a professional office structure. The applications • were submitted together to specifically limit the rezone • use to a professional office building. . SUMMARY OF r , Planning Department: Approval with restrictive covenants. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Denial. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report•was received by the REPORT: Examiner on September 20, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the' property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on September 4, 1979 for, the purpose of review of the rezone request. , However, due to necessity' of preparation of a special permit request to be reviewed concurrently with the request for rezone, a continuance was requested by the Planning Department and subsequently granted by the Examiner. • CONTINUANCE: • The hearing was opened on September 18, 1979 at 10:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. • •It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Roger Blaylock,, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map • Exhibit #3: Site Plan as submitted • • Exhibit #4: Site Plan with staff comments The Examiner noted that the Planning Department recommendation requests approval of the rezone with a condition of execution of restrictive covenants to restrict the use of the site to a medical professional office. building. Mr. Blaylock corrected a typographical error in Section N.4 from ". . .structure shall exceed. . ." to ". . .structure shall not exceed.. .". Referencing comments submitted by the Police Department regarding reduction of the speed limit on S.W. Sunset Boulevard from 50 m.p.h. to 35 m.p.h. , the Examiner ' advised that modification of speed limits is a responsibility of the State Highway Department .and not the Examiner. The Examiner inquired if consideration of. the P-1 zoning designation which would allow the proposed use•without restrictive covenants had been considered by the applicant or the Planning Department. Mr. Blaylock advised that because the P-1 zone also allows high-density residential hotels, the department had determined that the P-1 zone would not be appropriate for the proposal. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: • • Gary Jackson • 1919 Dexter Avenue N. Seattle, WA 98109 . • R-392-79, SP-407-79 Page Two Mr. Jackson indicated concurrence with the recommendations contained in Exhibit #1. He advised that many studies had been performed to determine proper use of the site which • would be compatible with the neighborhood and allow best use of the land. He noted that subsequent to the previous rezone of the site to R-1, a seven-lot plat had been prepared and submitted to the Planning Department; however, departmental staff had directed the applicant to consider an alternative zoning classification more in conformance to the Comprehensive Plan designation of low density multifamily. He requested the opportunity to respond further following audience comment. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. There was no response. He then requested testimony in opposition•to the proposal. Responding was: Steve Eastman. 317 Powell Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 • • Mr. Eastman inquired regarding responsibility for payment of an extension of the watermain to the subject site. He, also indicated opposition to the proposed rezone of the property to R-3 which will 'set a precedent for further reclassification of surrounding property to multifamily categories and jeopardize the existing character of the neighborhood. Mr.- Blaylock advised that all costs incurred for extension of the watermain will be borne by • the developer. Responding was: , • Pat Texeira 1013 S.W. 3rd Place Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Texeira submitted a petition containing 138 signatures representing 96% of the adjacent, surrounding property owners, and a map designating properties owned •by petitioners. The map and petition were entered into the record by the Examiner as follows: • • Exhibit #5: Map designating property of petitioners Exhibit #6: Petition . Mr. Texeira read the petition into the record which denoted opposition to the proposed rezone due to detrimental effect on surrounding single family residential character. It noted that previous review of an application for rezone had occurred the previous year and the current zoning category of R-1 had been determined by the Examiner• to be appropriate. The petition further objected to the proposal due to creation of spot zoning .within an already existing R-1 zone, and noted existing hazardous conditions on S.W. Sunset Boulevard (SR-900) , a heavily traveled highway. The petition also stated that due to congestion on SR-900, access to the subject site would be unrealistic from that highway•and 'would cause traffic to utilize S.W. 3rd Place and Powell Avenue S:W., adjacent streets to the site, and consequently jeopardize safety of children and disturb the peace and tranquility of the existing single family neighborhood. It also reported the inadequacy of bus service . in the area, and noted that cost of extension of watermains and sewer lines will be an additional burden to taxpayers. • Responding was: Wayne Kappenman • 1004 S.W. 4th Place Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Kappenman inquired regarding the necessity for property owners to attend a public hearing regarding rezone of a 'site which had been reviewed and rezoned the previous year. He noted that'an increase of traffic on sR-900 was the only change in the area since that time. He read excerpts from Conclusions 1, 3, 6 & '7, denoted in the Examiner's Report, and Recommendation, dated February -15, 1978, File No. R-114-77, 'relating to Comprehensive Plan goals to maintain single family neighborhoods from encroachment of commercial" and industrial uses, overcrowding influences and arterial traffic; creation of spot zoning by approval of the proposal; rezoning not being in the best interest of the community in general; and nonexistence of similar zones in the immediate area. • Mr. Kappenman reported a discrepancy in the site plan, Exhibit #4, which designates access to, S.W. 3rd Place, and Section B.6 of Exhibit #1, which states that access is proposed via S.W. Sunset Boulevard. He advised that the City of Renton Building Division does not have a record of release of the permit for grading in compliance with a request from the King County Building Division, and he questioned whether the fill operation was accomplished with _appropriate permits. He also questioned the directive from the Planning Department for development of the site for a use other than single family residences. Responding.to Mr. ' Kappenman's inquiry, Mr. Blaylock advised that when .the applicant submitted,his basic drawings for the proposal of a seven-lot plat, the Planning Department had felt that an Alternative use may be appropriate for the subject site, and had reviewed the possibility ' . R-392-79, SP-407-79 Page Three . of a medical clinic with the applicant, who'subsequently applied for such use.. . • Mr. Kappenman inquired if the Planning Department or the applicant had• contacted the State Highway Department regarding revision of the speed limit on S.W. Sunset Boulevard. He reported that'he had contacted King County and had been advised that the speed limit could • not be reduced due to potential creation of congestion in that location. Noting that 67 - parking spaces are proposed on the site in conjunction with a medical clinic,_ Mr. Kappenman felt that additional congestion on an already dangerous corner would be created. He advised that a rezone of property west of the site on S.W. Sunset Boulevard had•been requested in King County and subsequently denied, which supports his statement that no multifamily residential use exists in near proximity to the site. Mr. . Kappenman also ' noted that an existing steep bank on the site which has evidence of seepage had not been - addressed in the Planning Department report. Responding was: . Linda Texeira 1013 S.W. 3rd Place Renton, WA 98055 . Mrs. .Texeira reviewed the history of the existing neighborhood in which some of Seattle's original families resided, and noted that retention of the character is of historic value to the City of Renton. She advised that new construction as well as moving of other homes in- to the area is occurring, others are in the process of being remodeled, and the number of • children is also increasing. She indicated concern regarding traffic patterns and congestion which endanger the safety of children walking to school without benefit of sidewalks or curbs on existing streets. Referencing Section F.5 of Exhibit #1, which states that no recreational parks exist in the area, Mrs. Texeira advised that the site of the former Earlington Elementary School is now a designated city park which has been well-maintained by Park Department employees during the summer for the benefit .of children residing in the single family residential area. The Examiner requested further testimony by the applicant. Mr. Jackson advised his opinion • that the Planning Department has reviewed the surrounding area and the proposal would be in the. best interest of the neighborhood in establishing a use which would provide employment and a neighborhood service between the hours of eight to five on weekdays only, and disallow construction of single family housing in a location which is not suitable for that purpose. He indicated that solution to problems of traffic congestion and safety hazards would be required for any use on the subject property and could be resolved by the State Highway Department. He noted that a seven-lot plat would contain lots of small size, and due to existing noise, traffic, topography and shape, the site is undesirable for single family living and a turnover in residency would occur which would consequently devalue the surrounding residences. Responding to earlier testimony, Mr. Jackson advised that the seepage problem existing on the bank on the site is correctable. He indicated that the site cannot remain undeveloped, and the proposal will be properly designed to provide compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Jackson felt that spot zoning can be allowed if the proposed use ties in with the community. The Examiner clarified that if a proper use is allowed in a proper zone, it is not defined as spot zoning. Mr. Jackson indicated that he had contacted neighboring residents and it was their opinion that the site 'is not suitable for residential use due to 'existing traffic noise. The Examiner noted that the submitted petition, Exhibit #6, had contained 138 signatures and he inquired regarding the identify of the residents contacted by 'the applicant. Mr. Jackson declined to identify the residents, but stated that their concerns related to railroad and highway noise which could not be controlled by barriers on a single family plat.- • The Examiner inquired if alternative business and.professional uses for non-commercial, non-retail services had been reviewed for the site. Mr. Jackson advised that the proposal hadlbeen submitted for professional offices and a clinic, and if restriction to medical clinic use could be eliminated, other non-commercial uses could be proposed. Regarding water pressure in the area, Mr. Jackson indicated that pressure is currently adequate, and no additional systems would be required. The Examiner requested further comments. Pat Texeira noted his opinion that the public hearing regarding the proposal is very similar to the hearing held the previous year, and the Planning Department and the applicant had neglected the human element, concerns of those residents surrounding the site. The Examiner inquired if Mr. Texeira believes the site which . has an elevation level with the roadway is appropriate for single family residential development in consideration of noise emitted from the highway. Mr. Texeira felt that the problem could be mitigated by provision of a wall and tree plantings,. and reiterated previous comments regarding retention of the existing single family character of the area. Responding was: Mike Wilson ' 915 S.W. Langston Road • Renton, WA 98055 R-392-79, SP-407-79 Page Four Mr. Wilson felt that the applicant should not economically profit at the expense of the surrounding residents. ' He cited various problems resulting in accidents due to blind spots in existing streets, deadend streets, and traffic congestion, and noted. that additional traffic from a proposed clinic would further impair the existing situation. Mr. Kappenman inquired if the applicant had explained to those residents he had contacted that a rezone to R-3 would allow other uses including multifamily residential as well as • the proposed medical clinic. The Examiner advised that the application was submitted concurrently with a special permit to restrict the use of the site to a medical clinic by ' execution .of restrictive covenants, but the extent of information relayed by the applicant' to surrounding residents is unknown. Mr. Kappenman referenced Finding No. 13, Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding previous rezone, File No. R-114-77, dated February 15, • 1978, which states that it is not shown that the City of Renton had provided King County with final review of the landfill prior to release of performance bonds associated with the landfill permit or release of bonds, and inquired if the possibility exists for the applicant to apply ,for a rezone if compliance with the grading permit has not been met. The Examiner stated that he is uncertain if discussion regarding the grading permit is relevant to the subject of the rezone, and that all filling and grading would be required to meet approval by' the Public Works Department prior to development. He also noted that the fill permit may be a complicated matter of cross-jurisdiction since the fill permit was issued to the'applicant by King' County prior to annexation, and the City of Renton • would have no jurisdiction in the county. He advised that approval of further filling and grading on the site would be required by the City of Renton. Referencing the King County application for, fill. permit, dated June 24, 1974, which he submitted to the Examiner with a copy of a letter from the King County Building Division to the City of Renton Building Division, dated January 20, 1976, regarding the same subject, Mr. Kappenman noted a restriction had been imposed requiring a 50-foot setback from the'creek, and he advised that the creek no longer exists on the site due to the fill project. • The Examiner requested testimony from the Traffic Engineering Division. Responding was: Paul Lumbert Traffic Operations Engineer • The Examiner requested review by Mr. Lumbert of traffic•problems on S.W. Sunset Boulevard and access to the site and surrounding areas from Sunset and S..W. 3rd Place. Mr. Lumbert indicated that definite traffic and access problems exist in the area partly due to joint jurisdiction by the City of Renton within the city limits and the State Department of Transportation and the State Highway Commission outside the city limits on S.W. Sunset Boulevard. He advised that turning movements to Sunset, S.W. 3rd Place and 80th Avenue S. were added after the roadway was originally constructed, and the original roadway contained drainage facilities in the center section in a raised median. Be stated, that the temporary connection with slightly different grades, across the median barrier does not create a safe crossing. Mr. Lumbert advised that the city does not have jurisdiction at the intersection which falls outside the city limits on the easterly side of N.W. 3rd Place and the State Highway Department would be the responsible agency to take corrective. action, if any. He noted that off-site 'improvements including curbs, gutters and sidewalks on three sides would be required on N.E. 3rd Place if the request is approved. The Examiner inquired regarding access to and from the site. Mr. Lumbert advised that very limited access could occur on S.W. 3rd Place, and certain access would be possible on S.W. Sunset Boulevard; however, because of terrain and topography, it would be doubtful if access could .be allowed to 80th Avenue S.W. , and no left turns would be permitted across the median on S.W: Sunset Boulevard. The Examiner inquired regarding control of turning movements. Mr. Lumbert indicated that signs could be installed prohibiting turning.movements and regulations enforced by the Washington State Patrol, King County Police and Renton Police Department. The Examiner inquired if the city had considered installation of a. pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection. of S.W. 3rd Place. Mr. Lumbert' indicated that the matter had not been considered because of the dangers to pedestrians similarly experienced at an existing crosswalk further east on Sunset Boulevard due to excessive speeds of vehicles traveling from the unincorporated area of King County. The Examiner inquired if a traffic signal had been considered for correction of the,problem. Mr. Lumbert advised that because the intersection is not within the city limits, determination of the necessity of a signal would be in the jurisdiction of King County and the Department of Transportation. The ' Examiner inquired regarding intersections east of the subject site on S.W. Sunset Boulevard. ' Mr. Lumbert reported that the nearest intersection to N.W. 3rd Place is located approximately one-half mile to. the east. He noted that in a new proposal for development in the Earlington area south of the site, installation of a traffic control device has been recommended oh Sunset to allow traffic gaps and safe entrance for vehicles and pedestrians. • R-392-79; SP-407-79 Page Five Mr. Kappenman noted that in view of the testimony by Mr. Lumbert, the bulk of traffic from the site will utilize S.W. 3rd Place for access. Mr. Lumbert indicated that the larger number of vehicles would exit from the site onto S.W. 3rd Place but would eventually access onto S.W. Sunset Boulevard which would not create congestion during non-peak traffic hour's. Mr. Texeira reported that two fatalities have occurred at the subject intersection. Mr. Lumbert indicated awareness of pedestrian and motorcycle-related fatalities; but responsibility for safety in that location falls outside the jurisdiction of the City of - Renton. Mrs. Texeira reported existence of a sign designating the city limits halfway • between 80th Avenue S. and S.W. 3rd Place which would locate the intersection within the city limits. The Examiner explained the direction of the city boundary which, follows the north side .of S.W. Sunset Boulevard and makes a jog at 80th Avenue S. , noting that the intersection at S.W. 3rd Place remains within the jurisdiction of King County. Mr. Texeira inquired if a traffic study had been accomplished by the city ,in the location of the intersection. Mr. Lumbert advised that traffic had been observed and a determination made that turning movements are not safe. Mrs. Texeira stated that S:W. 3rd Place deadends four blocks north but several other routes are available prior to that point .to allow traffic to proceed through a residential area in which no sidewalks exist. The Examiner 'requested further testimony. There was no response. Be then requested final comments from the Planning Department. .The Planning Department had no further comments. Mr. Texeira requested a continuance of the hearing regarding the special permit pending the decision on the .rezone request. The Examiner advised his preference to close the public hearing since all issues had been thoroughly addressed for purposes of review. • The hearing was subsequently closed by the Examiner at 11:40 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a rezone of +1.3. acres of land from R-1 (single family residence) to R-3 (medium density multifamily residence) together with a request for approval of a special permit to permit the construction of a professional office building on the 'site. 2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full. therein. ' 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All utilities may be extended to the subject site. 6. The proposal is compatible with the required .setbacks,• lot 'coverage and height requirements Of Section 4-709A of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. . 7. The subject property is located along S.W. Sunset Boulevard between 80th Avenue S. and S.W. 3rd Place. The site has been filled under a permit issued .by King County prior to annexation to the City of Renton. The property slopes about one to two percent from the north to the south. The .site.is covered with grasses and brush. There was an intermittent stream coursing through the property from north to south prior to filling. The site is currently undeveloped. 8. The subject property and surrounding property were annexed into the city in February, 1975. The property was classified at that time as G (general - single family residence) . In April, 1978, the subject property with the concurrence of the City Council was rezoned to R-1 (File No. R-114-77; see attached).. The applicant at that time had requested an R-2 (duplex residence) classification. • 9. The record indicates that the applicant had applied 'for a long plat of the subject property in order to construct seven single family units on the subject parcel to comply with the R-1 designation of the property. The record further indicates that R-392-79, SP-407-79 Page Six the Planning Department suggested that-a single family development will be inappropriate along heavily traveled S.W. Sunset Boulevard. That department then suggested the alternative proposal of a professional office building which can be constructed with a special permit' in an R-3 zone. Wherein this rezone request was initiated to rezone the subject property from R-1 to R-3. The special permit request, if approved, would allow the construction of a two story, 13,000 square foot professional office building • with parking facilities for 67 cars. 10. The nearby residents submitted a petition signed by 138 property owners objecting to the rezone request. 11. The property surrounding the, site on three sides is.zoned R-1 which is 'the present classification of the subject site. The nearest multiple family residence zones either in the city or King County are over one-fourth of a mile to the west and to the east of the subject site. One single family residence north of the subject site lies at the same elevation of the subject site. Other homes in the adjacent area lie above the general elevation of the subject site. New single family development has occurred in the area and . home remodeling is also occurring in the area. 12. The Traffic .and Engineering Divisions indicated that traffic along S.W. Sunset Boulevard ' f' • is very heavy during peak hours. The Police Department indicated that access to and from the site should be limited to S.W. 3rd Place to prevent turning, movements directly off of and onto S.W. Sunset Boulevard. 13. The Comprehensive Plan for the area in which the subject site is located appears to designate about one-fourth of the subject site for potential low density multifamily development. • • 14. King ,County denied a rezone request for multifamily classification for the Washington Horse Breeders' Association property west of the' subject site. ML (King County designation of. light manufacturing) property in King County is across S.W. Sunset Boulevard and isolated by a rather steep slope. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant for a rezone must demonstrate that the request for the reclassification • is. appropriate. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that there have been any changes in circumstance's since the previous rezone either relating to .the property itself or the neighboring area which would justify the request. The property was rezoned just over one year ago and the operative facts and conclusions of that rezone (see attachment) have not undergone any significant and material change which would justify a rezone at this time (Section 4-3014(A)1 & 3) . • 2. The single family nature of the area adjacent to the subject site on three sides remains unchanged.' Significantly, further single family development has occurred in the area. Home improvement and remodeling also indicate that the area remains a strong and vital single family area which would be breached by the intrusion of the R-3 zone and associated professional office building proposed on the subject -parcel. The intrusion • of the more intense use would place pressure on adjoining property, zoned R-1, developed in single family uses and also along S.W. Sunset Boulevard- to request reclassification. This result would be contrary to the Comprehensive Plan objective which is to: • "1. Prevent blight by protecting residential arid other exclusive districts • from the'unwarranted infiltration of:incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolescence, and prevent the development of orderly growth patterns '(Page 17) . 4. Protect property values within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners, through the effective control of land use and the enforcement and application of building and construction codes (Page 17) . 6. Encourage the development and utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which to Work, shop; 'live and play (Page 18) . " (Land Use ,Report, Comprehensive Plan, July, 1965) Therefore, the applicant has not demonstrated that the proposed_rezone would meet the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan as required pursuant to Section 4-3014(A)2, Hearing Examiner Ordinance. • • R-392--79, SP-407-79 Page Seven • 3. A .similar multifamily rezone request was rejected by King County for property in the area because of the single family character of the surrounding area and because of the impact of added traffic to an already hazardous roadway. The ML property south of the subject property is well separated from the subject property by the steep slope on the south side of S.W. Sunset Boulevard and does not, in fact, intrude physically or visually into the single family district in which the subject property is located. 4. The rezone would not be in the best interests of the surrounding community nor would it further the public welfare. The.proposed rezone.and proposed clinic would greatly increase traffic on both S.W. Sunset Boulevard and through the residential neighborhood surrounding the subject site. A 13,000 square foot building on two floors and a 67- space parking area would be developed per the proposal. This more intense use would • be both out of character and visually out of scale with the adjacent single family • neighborhood. The proposed rezone would be for the express benefit of the applicant but continued classification of the subject property as R-1 would be in the best interests of the community. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should deny the rezone. ORDERED THIS 27th day of September, 1979. - 17:3 • Fred J. Ka an Land Use Hea ing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of September, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: . Gary Jackson, 1919 Dexter Avenue N. , Seattle; WA 98109 Kohl & Christianson, 3330 E. Valley Rd. , Renton, WA 98055 Steve Eastman, 317 Powell Avenue S.W., Renton, WA 98055 Pat & Linda Texeira, 1013 S.W. 3rd Place, Renton, WA 98055 Wayne Kappenman, 1004 S.W. 4th Place, Renton, WA 98055 Mike Wilson, 915 S.W. Langston Rd. , Renton, WA 98055 Virginia Shimm, 1124 S.W. Sunset Blvd. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of September, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director • Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before October 11, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other, specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be• purchased at cost in said department. . . ' Ar -63 000 " ' ~ in 44 � ,R, atocu 16 It TrwT2== . / ~ ` moopus . / � KOHL & C| RlSTTANSON ADDlTIU@ R- ' 2-7g 5P-4074y ' - � KOHL & CHRl5TlAN50N ADDITION TOTAL AREA �o��a�±I^^3 ~~^~~ [A/v | ' \/iu S.W. OUxnot Blvd. r mi l |'AL H-li Si l��oil �� Single ST i�� `/�L Dodevelnppd�___ Professional Office Stri�t Ure, CYMPh[H' m^` v[ L. U�[ >`| A-1____ _l��w l�v�eity 0uIti� . . • ' • . • . . r . • P • . . ,• • • 1 C CPI = I•J I .4-.1 • V .-r. 4-1 . • n 1 / i ;"N'.• ‘'N• %•••••. •••• • ;...... .• • • /.• .../.,r11!,. /' ,'t•P .// •••.. • / 'ri 0 . . •i 1 / . i • ' . • . • I I • // •/// , . •.-.',.. / . . •A• :.1. 44:r • -,...1 ci .., / • ./. •. • "C.• : ••-..I --3 . I ../ CO I--I 1/ /7/4/ : , • - c. • ••• /1'\.\\s. (.N1,,S: „... , •,..... . 0 ••4•• 'Sr ' 1 C•C? r/ 1. ‘ / ';/y ... • ',.7:4 '' \ ....‘ ...., ': •. `• . „;...... '• . . \ N ... So...... Nit I . / • / ( /...X ..,......---....'. '...I.,. . •. • • ...."tlit. ip .... •. • 64: / / 1? ,- . ..‹......./ el / /• . 'C.• / // \f.'e -I ....- )1 t. .i• . .."' . ••• C" b5.":" ' ' r • . . / 1 jC•.N11,/ Fel ,.,-...., , • , . nt•I. \,......„/ / .. lig„mg t r.• ....?, ,' t. / .t. .7 / ///,./ S. t'l ../ • 6:,.. ..t .• . A:14..... • 1: .;t• / • . N..// ,••. •,-." / /. , . 4•' `. .s• . .' i r 4. .p A , i t..-.., li / „..„ . ,...„ , , .0, • ., .0 .1. 4 . ••• .....-V ' "' -A ,.; • % k ... ivi 4.1 / - '', -.;.,';''<•• .-.• ..,.... *•.- •:-•11‘... .. 't s , tP / ..,., - • i •••.,v. I4/ /' X . . ' • i< .2'•• ,'.'.., .A.,' . , , . V1 A ..,:. ,:, ..t k • // ,),) ./ t .. ... ' ,,,. . •.. .:•...' *.••,... ,. /• / , / f-3 1 \ • . • ,. . /,/...•/ ..kli -,,..:2,„—•••-.,, t;...• • \ . ' / •. s.....:•:.v,,,, , ‘1,• . ,,' ,•.,-.., „, h, :t.. . .-, ‘.. .... . • . • •,„,.., i •---•,\ . I N.•••• . .,•• ../',.. '•• ' . ..„. \ • ':."4/' *''' ). . . .• ••/ / (tY ,• r .,.. \'" tf. ' .....- ..' ›''' 's // , ' /• •:i . • / /1 ..V ,•\ ,‘„..( '/L'ii•'/ .'I.,' , 0 • / \ ''' ( . / /". ,/ ,;`•',..\• . k .< '•.., '•. ',e/• "..„/. ir. ./ -./ \• / / ( 7 , `,'• .'"' ' • .. .... ••••••••,_. / . ,x,.ri .. ‘...,. . .' . is, : ., ,• . ,,,,,, „.. / , . , . •e:1, ... • . .,. • , ' .01 / ./ 't ,•. • i . • ••••' • \/., •. . 4 I 1,31. / .. •,.. ,. ,•• ..4:,) • • . •••••• • • / .. / / '.1 '- r- ‘..-. .... ...., .C:./.. _?..„. . „. .......----- . i .rc ., CI, - k • i .• ks• i i ' , <, ,-• •. \ 1,... N',' .•• r, / 1 I .' • "d•-- 1 • •./''• •• , • .). •••., , 1 '16 '. I I I " .) I . \ • I • / ... . •, • ' • 1..1 .' '. . / ..' S•:' . 's 0: '.' . :..,• ' • . I .c( ,, • I , '.• •( I . . \.• i .• .. • ... • / t‘• • ' ' ' ' i) • . •• ''•C I /...% . . . ..... ..... '• .' S. • / , • / / : • -• i •••:•• .• "r••. •••. , ••,( , \ .., k' . .1 • ..., , . •\ \ • -''k• . •••:. " • . • . • . . -....----.7---•,----____.\ : ...• , -• , vi /v...... • .\ \., . .,..s.. .,..... .4. .... --—.., .......... ...4( L) b/ , \ / . \. • \, . i \,).•' . • . \ ,..:,,. / ./'.'. ,-/' . (. sl ../..... S. • ` - \",....1..,,,. ,•I ../• . ( c 1 •41` ' \ \' - -/ / N .4.'s \.‘• .. \‘ .:N1?":\. / / \\\ ' 44\ / . \ . 1 '• / .....0,1 --....„...... . \ • '.....--••••-.........1 .•• • •- • L'• C.. qi /Ut..... • • - .e • • .. lf,%h.. , --r---;/•.:-..:_-_z_----....._...... -, ----:. .. _iii.t,-. `t7---1 '',.k ck,. . . NI, ... ,• ,,,, ----- •-- .._._ - — . -••t., - ';-• --1..i.` -......_..... 1, \\•:\ . IL__.. \ (.. ' cs %\ 1. 1..‘ ..... ......./ ,/. /7 •s) ••••••.... ......., . • 11 1\-11-- — -7'1\ ..,, ,:u... ., . , . .„„... : . .........._ , ... • ,, ,. _._ . ,_:. = ..., ., .,. . ., ,/,,,-,,r , ...........7 .... -7 . -1-.4\ •/ ( i ' ii I rt:11 7-ii---.:•:1 ; i ‘-.1 \ ..,,....• ' ••) r. ,i \i„......xr 4' .i. ••••i, /e•••• St • / i )_ /.....:1/. .......i 17 /I• 7.1 \ i : •'/ ie'...71'.1c1 ..:7 1.,: • I - \ • ,w;...„, .1 ...• •.... .,"itx. •...t I 4 /(..-- .... •: % ••••••sx...... .. .,..• 4./.. .L_„....:: i '.•.) •' V,r'4,'.• sr\,1.; :. ..,''::f•::.-)1,eif \ • -:",_ \\''''1. ,./ /.. /. 1 I',/.-.,:4ii• -- . .:1 -• ,:-.--.:1 v.i .. •••,, :s.1‘,'" ‘, i • i...,-, ., L.,.........1.... , L. ,...„,i_::i \ • - ' -..i.,:!/i*:: .1 .7...:1::. ,..7:-..iyir 4. It? 1/47 . ,s.\.,......\ it; • •1.,•,...,,, . r--7.-47-.74.:--4 \ . \ q1, t t:1;„ 1 f :-. --.. _t-41 -- 1 ,..:,.%,,,,, •••:.f.\., .' 1.P4..• ir.•1/4;1'.`...1.?( / — .r.:;1 /i. .. i . .,,,c. . ) ';''': -'''''iriii-'i J• (',11'11hit'll!iti f. • \ . , I, . c- . . • . . - • f.:. 11 .1 , . r— •... •;.11-•••• .•-••• V \ .11 1 . • . .' . • . . OF R4, jiz c y i z THE CITY OF RENTON 4 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 ti 1111. 1F CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 .31$ P� 235- 2550 1"1. EC' SEPS*- September 7, 1979 Kohl and Christianson 3330 E. Valley Road Renton , Washington 98055 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICES/CLINICS IN R-3 ZONE ; File SP-407-79 ; property located on S.W. Sunset Blvd. between 80th Ave . So. and 81st Ave. So. or S.W. 3rd P1. Dear Sirs : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on August 29 , 1979 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for September 18 . 1979 at 9 :00 a _m_ • Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director By : , r E • Roger J . Blaylock , Associate Planner Note: Your rezone application , File R-392-79 , was continued to this public hearing on September 4 , 1979. cc : Gary Jackson 1919 Dexter Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98109 THIS PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON S.W. SUNSET RLVD, (SR-90U) BETWEEN BOTH AVENUE SO AND S.W, 3RD PLACE (H1ST AVENUE SO) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DSCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPTH I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON SEPTEMBER 18, 197, 9 BEGINNING AT 9 : 0U AM A.M. P.N. CONCERNING ITEM E1' UAEZONE SPECIAL PERMIT p3 CZONERELERNOESiOWFICE IN rl SITE APPROVAL IIII WAIVER II SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT ■ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION dk NOTICE I E OF f PUBLIC HEARING ; ;;;; ') RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON SEPTEMBER 18 , 19 79 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION : 1 . KOHL AND CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3 , File R-392-79 ; property located on S . W . Sunset Blvd ( SR-900) between 80th Ave. So. and S . W . 3rd P1 . (81st Ave . So. ) . 2. KOHL AND CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IN R-3 ZONE , File SP-407-79 ; property located on S . W. Sunset Blvd ( SR-900) between 80th Ave. So. , and S .W. 3rd P1 . (81st Ave. So . ) 3 . IRVING W. HULL , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM .R-3 TO R-4 , File R-394-79 ; property located at 421 Burnett Ave. So. 4. DR. ANDREW DEAK, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO P- 1 , File R-405-79 ; property located at 4509 Talbot Rd. So . 5 . DR. ANDREW DEAK, APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO DEVELOP PARKING LOT IN P-1 ZONE FOR PARKING LOT FOR ADJOINING MEDICAL FACILITY , File SA-406-79 ; property located at 4509 Talbot Rd. So . 6 . BILL HEATH , APPLICATION FOR FOUR-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL , File 401-79 , AND APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING STREET WIDTH AND CONSTRUCTION OF CURBS AND SIDEWALKS , File E-408-79 ; property located in the vicinity of 1303 N . 26th St . • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED September 7 . 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I . STEI(E MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE—ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN T.iREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , o:i the 5th of Sept. 1979 ----- SIGNEDJ:Lig.‘&41,100%... CITY OF RENTON ,cE,r4T04, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMI. 4 p 14 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY N. File No. SP- la9 7f Date Rec' d. �4, A G Application Fee $ �76 Receipt No .f0 ANNih Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COM LETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name tat.__, c CS'Z't/Jt -Scst.A. D (-rt 6•4$, Phone ' 2 2 G.7 , 662-0 Address a0 ' • / % }T® r fr ti'46- : . 2. Property location 4,1, . . .t K3L�! .. ) ,`Z— . "_ ®g li.4' c6, r- -kM 61) 5:-. kr. --g-sizefLacaL--- :3. Legal description (attach additi nal sheet i necessary) . -- O�l- zibe 131 '-res.)w-N.S.14 t( 23 L 2- 1-736 1.1� �P111'� r:0+4 �-� r=- ice- - 1 � i_ , t. I ,-, L._., c�-S-- �oi�Ca t - CDL-UAA e, P� �-- t 04 g t 2. c� ]-�.c7 -� ^f. .1tOC'7 —SS -1-s 1-``i c> 714- ✓ M -/t��? tit=) ,/,s>s �-�4""°`N- - l ]— o 4 . Number of acres or square feet 4= t.e3 &2 —S Present Zoning -` � 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? , «00 V G L.21_ • (2- ---ri==.112-l- - ----. ---C)C.042- 1, t).e.4Z-4-- ----1.--c2,c)i--z)_ 6E ,s ' \---- 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or ,20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307. 5 in addition to the above. 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks • • Planning Dept. `s::,,, _ 1-77 AFFIDAVIT • I, ' , being duly sworn, declare that I am t e owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me . this,9day of e20442446r , 19> Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at � d f11 . r e Name -ocit'ary 'Public) .(Signature of Owner) iAMss) (Address) (City) • State) �z c --c c • (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and re s of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of s gdirty 'on . O<( Date Received , �� y: • 155 Renton Planning Dept . �'�NN(NG 2-73 PLANNING DEPARTMENT � { PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: KOHL & tHRISTIANSON ADDITION , File Nos : R-392-79 SEPTEMBER 1S, 1979 SP-407-79 PAGE TWO 2. Soils : The site consists of Beausite gravelly sandy loam (BeC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid . Available water capacity is low. _Runoff is medium, and the :hazard of erosion is moderate . This soil is used for timber ari'd pasture and for urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The majority of the site consists of light brush and grass . Minor amounts of scrub brush and bushes are also evidenced on the site . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation of the site is sufficient to provide a suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : Prior to filling the site it appears that an intermittent stream crossed from north to south near the easterly one third of the site . It appears that surface drainage has been controlled as part of the fill operation . Even though there Is no sign of a stream or surface water on the site at the present time , a high ground water table is probable, because there were no drainage improvements constructed with. the fill . 6. Land Use :' The site is currently in an undeveloped state . To the southwest , it abuts S . W. Sunset Boulevard , an extremely busy arterial . The surrounding area consists primarily of older single family residences . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The subject site is located in a marginal older single family residence neighborhood . The development of the site may have potential . spill -over effects in helping to upgrade the surrounding area . F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An existing 6 inch water main is located along N . W. 3rd Place near the northeast corner of the subject site: An 8 inch sewer main exists along S . W. Sunset Boulevard . 2 . Fire Protection : Fire protection is provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . , Any future develop- ment of the site will be subject to the City of Renton standards . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route No . 107 operates along S . W . Sunset Boulevard within one block of the subject site. 4 . Schools : The site is within one-half (I ) mile of Earlington Elementary School , three-quarters (3/4 ) of a mile of Dimmitt Junior High School , and within one ( 1 ) mile of Renton High School . 5 . Parks : There are no recreational parks in the area . G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-709A, R-3 , Medium Density Multi -Family Residence District. . 2. Section 4-706 , R-1 , Residence Single Family District . 3. Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading . 4 . Section 4-725 , Amendments . , H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY. .DOCUMENTS : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 , and objectives pages 1,7 and .18. I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 18 , 1979 APPLICANT: KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION FILE NUMBERS : R-392-79 , SP-407-79 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests a rezone from R-1 to R-3 and the approval of a special permit to allow the development of the site with a professional office structure. The applications were submitted together to specifically limit the rezone use to a professional office building . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : IVAN C . CHRISTIANSON 2 . Applicant: KOHL EXCAVATING , INC . 3. Location : Property located between 80th Avenue South and S .W . 3rd P1 . ; north of S . W. Sunset Blvd . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of the Property : Approximately ± 1 . 3 acres . 6 . Access : Via S .W. Sunset Blvd . 7 . Existing Zoning : R-1 , Residence Single Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R-1 , Single Family Residence District 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Low Density Multi -Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on August 24 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on August 23 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site and the surrounding area was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance #2913 dated February 10 , 1975 . It was rezoned to the present R-1 classification by Ordinance #3206 on April 15 , 1978 . D. PHSYICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site has a gentle slope of approximately ( 1 ) to two (2 ) percent from the north to the south . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE' HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , File Nos : R-392-79 SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 SP-407-79 PAGE FOUR of the property was used as a visual and sound buffer. In addition , Objective #6 , page 18 , would apply . .Its specific intent is to "encourage the development' and utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which to work , shop , live and play . " Development of an area that has a high potential for decay is not in the best interest of the City or the neighborhood . Thus the primary justification for the Hearing Examiner recommending a zoning classification of R- 1 for the property (R-114-77 ) is not appropriate if the potential single family residential development is not compatible with the existing single family residential and does not meet the intent of providing a buffer between Sunset Blvd . West and the existing single family residential area . In fact, the Hearing Examiner did not specifically address any of the potential problems of developing a single family residential subdivision on the subject site . 3. The proposed used of the subject site as a professional office building to provide a buffer to the established single family residential areas is consistent with the Compre- hensive Plan . This would appear to indicate that the requirement of Section 4-3014 (A)2 has been met . 4 . The professional office building as proposed would have approximately 13 ,000 square feet on two floors with 67 parking spaces . The site plan attempts maximum use of the site with a 20 foot setback of the building from Sunset Blvd . and a 5 foot landscaping strip between the parking lot and Sunset Blvd . This location adjacent to Sunset Blvd . with its heavy traffic volumes necessitates additional setbacks and . landscaping along this street for buffering and separation of uses . 5 . The intended use as a professional office building allows a variety of potential users from doctors to real estate people . Access and traffic volume is critical to any development of this location . Plus some professional office would possibly result in more than just a daily use . Real estate offices could be open late into the evening , while a medical office would tend to limit itself to more of an 8 a .m. to 5 p .m. work day . N . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS ; The staff recommends based on the above analysis that the Hearing Examiner approve and recommend to the City Council the approval of the rezone as requested , File No . R-392-79 , from R-1 Single Family Residential to R-3 , Multiple Family Residential subject to the following conditions to be established as restrictive covenants running with the land : 1 . The only permitted use of the site is for a medical professional office building . 2 . Setbacks - No building or structures shall be permitted within (a ) forty (40 ) feet from S . W . Sunset Boulevard ( State Road #2 ) ( b ) within thirty (30) feet of the northerly property line ; within thirty ( 30 ) feet of S . W . 3rd Place ; and within thirty (30 ) feet of 80th Avenue South . . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : KOHL 8&FCHRISTIANSON A,RDITION , Files Nos : R-392-79 SEPTEMBER 18 , 1979 • SP 407-79 PAGE THREE I . IMPACT UPON NATURALSYSTEMS : The re_zo.ning the property will not a direct impact on the natural ' systems . However , the proposed development of a professional office building on the site will disturb present soil and vegetation conditions , increase storm water runoff , and add to the noise and traffic levels . These conditions may be minimized by the application of proper development controls . J . SOCIAL IMPACTS : The development of the site for professional uses will not increase social interaction with the established single family residential area . • K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . L . ' AGENCIES/DEPARTMENT CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . •_ . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . M. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The Comprehensive Plan provides limited specific guidance concerning the development of the site . The map element of the Comprehensive Plan is only a guideline for development and must be used in reference to the actual nature of the neighboring properties . Approximately 25% of the subject site was designated for low density multiple family develop- ment to provide a buffer from Sunset Blvd . West for the establis-hed single family residential areas on top of the surrounding hills . This relationship of Sunset Blvd . West , the surrounding single family development , the access , and the sites topographic setting does not support the develop- ment of the subject site with single family residences . Based -on the unique characteristics the applicant has submitted a rezone request from R-1 to .R'-3 along with an application for a special permit to limit the development of the site . to a• professional office building . A special permit does not limit the use of the property within • -a specific zoning classification . A special permit is normally granted to allow a use in addition to those allowed outright. The only method that the City can require that is effective is the filing of restrictive covenants . 2 . The present traffic volumes and noise levels along Sunset Blvd . West suggest that the site developed with single family residences ,would not be complimentary to 'the established single ,famly residential area. The seven new residences would probably be of lower market value because of their location and thus Would have a higher potential to develop into an area of localized blight . Residential objectives stated on page 17 of the Land Use Report , Renton Comprehensive Plan suggest that " residential and other "excldsive districts " should be pro- tected from the unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses . In this case , the addition of more single family residences would be considered as " incompatible" unless most { Ah 01 IRS VS Izo 43 Ud Ij 17 iL Cl 4. CA 41, zz ------------ " KOHL & CHRTSTIAN5UN ADDITION ; R-392-79 3P-407-79 ` ' � � y APPLICANT KOHL & CHRISTIAN3UN ADDITION TOTAL AREA ±I,3 mozzam Via S.W. Sunset Blvd. PRINCIPAL A[[L6S_______ - � EX\ �� | N�� N �N� �l, Single F�� i��' ' ----- � EXISTING VSE "^"^e"=l`*"=u P� () 0P �LD U�E Professional`^= ^^," Cff1om Str�otor�^�`____ COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multi-Family C0MNENTS / PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : KOHL & CHRISTIANSON' 7DDITION , File Nos : R-392- 79 SEPTEMBER 18 , 1979 SP-407-79 PAGE five 3 . Landscaping/Buffer Areas - The first thirty (30 ) feet adjacent to the northerly property line shall be appropriately landscaped to provide a dense evergreen screen . The first fifteen ( 15 ) feet adjacent to S . W. Sunset Boulevard , and the first ten ( 10) feet adjacent to S . W. 3rd Place and 80th Avenue South shall be appropriately landscaped . Detailed landscape plans for the entire site development shall be submitted to and approved the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development review. 4. Height Limitation - Building or structure shall exceed a height of twenty-five (25 ) feet . 5. Access to the site shall be controlled with signed traffic safety along Sunset Boulevard and potential impacts to the adjacent residential streets . - The staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the request for a special permit as well , File No : SP-407-79 , subject to the above conditions . •+.-„ rv“ • 14XIU i .v UCfJUf6IIIj1➢ t. DEW } PMENT APPLICATION REVIEW I :ET Application : R6-204,/.; t" A ,A ; .LL= 1, Location : ain sw d e25 Applicant : 0 �� i� �Poi 0/161i .cm0 ' TO : Pars Department SCHEDULED HEARINGDATE : s� Police Department A. EL Co MEETING of. w1'9 • Public Works Department Engineering Division e� Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department IN I, N PF(S�iG1HErAPJLICAIION REVILW C THIs ONE litNLtDr(ARC®U 0 pROVTOED � E HELD ON / 79 _ AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE 1 F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATT N THE ARC, P EASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY D:UO PM ON 30 9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with conditions Not Ap proved - -lam 29 Sianature _of Director'or , uthorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved f �. ! / / 1 ra �� .#00 le)dif Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVE PMENT APPLICATION REVIEW T ET Application . 244„, (R. ?a.7?� „ f � a r i Location : d'1 /4,.,cedli sco i•a f. ". 7 1. 0 h C ' `!0,s e..,,�' � �' �� ° � Applicant : rA, nr/�4ea Awl I TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : /i/J7q Police Department A. R. C. MEETING / i/7, Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering B if ding Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department COMM rr P, SWGGESTJUNS REEGAR 11G THIS A'P ICCATT OP SHOULD PRODDED IN 1PJ N FOr; THE PJLICAI ION REVWCONFERENCE (ARC) pp vv � �O �� H�LDON ,M� I -79 • AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE I . F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTpp THE ARC, PEAS PROVIDE THE . COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: U0 PM ON i30 9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : FI(e Approved . . V Approved with conditions Not Approved rhr-L— //yD/erix,3- /t'e`r'u// 42 rNL= SCKFv/.Ce A/SI : /7/Zt`-t Uc'J 7 /I - /��l�L- /& c-'c/../S 7iC4 e-L //a`�, ride-6 /s/A.7 4,4 r' i.c.s7/� j(72Grt /1S l2"<' lc�i i� G,tiUi cif�2��-C /eCrcjf'e-e i lErr•7 c l"2:424.C-/ i"L'lcc � ✓rG /`1G7. /Z41/2--4-)I,t /'-1115'7 " '7 coo n ii/c/Z7 Signature of , Director or uthori • Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved . Approved with conditions Not Approved /�. Icl.ClLt.4.20b T3 W1i,er Foe {JL',..o..,„Ds possid,e Ltl(L C OF•s,!' ON Sy4V7% ignatur of Director or uthorized Representative Date y II -• . •• . . . • . .. . ••. „ . , 7:J I CD GI = CO r. tv '....] t.0 C'') •i-i •:,!:,i? V) - / N. ... • • • ' '4:'''',1 / .-3 ., '. , 1/,,, • . i-o ., .. . . I' ''',:': • ' - ' . '' . .''.' .. •. 7 ,1:,,,i ›. . ' 1/Cr: CT) . - . . ‘c5?. .' • . / "0 0 . .' . • ..• . . ..' ., . Z .... , . 1 I . - • 0 r.= • . s'\ 0 :• . / / • • .• ' . -•• N / • ' •••• '' .• j/. / .X % , 1 s.••••, / •NSI• sl„...,... I /59 i ' -.1. •••,„ 76r • • (.: '. .. ., • ‘') / ?iyy . . _. .. • ' ." (.....r(-/".:F,t \tc\ i s.,.. s. ...... ''.'. ''• . ...• . • • ‘"........ e •. • 'NS . . • v/ r /I.. .....----.-- F....:"., :',...,,`, •\ ..\\:\t\\\*4: \ i; /4\•, , i •,:. .,.../ '' ':" . / -, ;• , . A • ..-"t-•-.— \\k-d;,,„ u, • /41 . . • 9. ...' /*:•Ci.' / / e••:•/./ :16."' ' ... 1, .....) ' 1 9.' ';'''f I...\' •- j\ / i`C...:‘8'cl )tis / , .:.. i,/ k,'.b 4-\71:2-) . ' Ch -,ti)Z,•.'"'.*X , le Ul -t ' 7.*. :ID In ' ../ . t' / ,, .,..y / //) , 1 :Mrs f ! / / ii/ /\., ,. f I% ' .? I. •,,- • , , / /// ./ \4.- '' !".--r • it rh' II / . ,••:-A.t• ,. „„ / - s'.• C;f. 1 j • . r‘ -• • • ... i iti' . / ii.-/••i?, , •„I,, . / /". /. . ',.'. ./.( ::::. ... • .. ,, i .t A ... /, .. ,.i•, . .1 . 7• .N•>. ' : /. / Al'/.. •:„:":,&..)\2•\•,.. ...•Is.:,.'''... .N,., . • .st:\ .-- .. /•••• '‘`.. 0\ ,•' • r--.9• ... \'‘. • • <. ••• kr.'• . ) • \ i \ . / / . --,>,- „As, . ii:-.41/. , ‘4,.• .. 4 ' q L .. / / ,,, ,,; , , .., ., ... . . ( ;.. , .., //5..,. . . \: ., / f: ..,.. \\.i / "-'1 \.s., .. •• . • . / - / // • es .... , . 0.., r li l • / ,r , / / ,../ .• : / `1, ).,3,',. (.• ... ,. . ,- , .4:- 4.---i , 4 - • \ .k. • Ir."-.---:—.— . /I / • '-:-'. — ' .r/t', . , ' A- t . / .. a.., ..-."-,• . . .' ' • ' .c ,f c...).• , .. .,,/ ....' k‘....1 / , , ., .,-.....,. ....;•• ..............::. ' 1 / ,._...•-• -• • / / \ , Ir*.,- '••;• rr-,-',.' . / r, / • .•• •-••/ ) ' >' •,zr;:e.,- ii. -.. .. , . ,:. .: \,. . ., , / • ...,: .! , . •• ,...s .• .„. , / ,.. ••'•:i. I I 1 . • L.: --..-...-:-:..,.....-;.. / „..,.,.. •...\. , . •-•-••...-••, 1 . . . . • -•.,„, •• ../ 1.• i,. , . -............-.."...-:.... ----44-.. \ I , . .. ..• ,.,. - ......... _ . . „ 1, / •:. . ,•:i'.); ,..-, — --:---'-...,.. ... -/ .. . / 7 •. ,.(...;., 1 • • , • I . \ ?' •': ' '.: ....1) , • t , \ . _ .__._,.__ s ‘', • ' J I.• • •(. -..'''' '':'' \ -- • - •-•• •• •,....- .. ...,.... . . .., . .,.,., - -, •• ,-•%_, .t7 --7 .,,_______ _.____ .. .• ,r1 \ • . . \ \ ..- N - , -. •. ....<. •• / \ • _____...,......__....._. /, • (,.. / •• r ,\- • ,,,- ..., - pi . . N ' • \ • • )... ' • 9, • „, '•'1'`‘ i..` / ' . \•... ..S. • .' ,‘ ' • / .• 1 1 \ ----'1-•- • . . -\\N-—-•'1. 4,,. • ,....i..,,......, I/ .7'. ----1 ;- -- . • 11% , • .• (?) •• s• . N:2 L 7.1 • . .. . • .,•••-•-•,l' s\-—',, .t= _1 ••••:. dtt.,., 7 -r&: -.___ • is • ..„-, / ,. ); ,.. . ‘ _.. .... c.,---11\ "-II= :.-_-:..7/ • • . • ...% Y-. : —:--.' 1._. /. _..„,,... , 0, •::: ---1' 1 I I ..C1' \ rl - ---7:7-1 ,—— -. '. - 1/4 • ..)‘9C., n ...... . . _, .` \\_.,./:-' '.'90 ,-. • --ii / ) ._--77 -/I.: .09 . • •. % 1 1 1 0 / • -,?...477.1 1.7 ‘\\ Z.,., _ . :11 . i v.., A , . ..7 r \ . ., \ .:`•c',• •••• - -.7 ,---,- .... •.\\\‘\,\s\-ii.:(/ ( , . I f//r.• V . -.. .-- = __-_ . •, ,-,1....? --I - -- • /-- \ 1, / / :•,:7._ • _ . -- •-: --: :/,;-.:;: \, \ k • •' k- ill IT.•/.':T,P...;:gt;.•..i? ' =-- , Is_ \ -•;.. -\ • •:•.,..\\ . -... .„ TII:f..L:71-40:14,;.yr -,,-, r; „I, T__. /./ti:7 :-/-. ....•';'4 - /-71'./.. fo`F•• ,,.c. _ ,,•,\.,-77,,u1, \ „ -,..„• ,..• ,[ifj •. -, , ..,. r.. 41/ [I' IV 1)1,IL,,?\-• ?(.';r•---'-v...----Z L . Liliffilin . , • ' . // \ . ,\ • DEW"—-PMENT APPL I CATION REVIEW Application : WA2,0 (R3? n) Frio ru � Location : 0„ $ 6.,p,54- ! yr sr 0-4i9/ Applicant : ph/ d w�.S4 6114° 57/1°1 TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: +";/,'f,• Police' Department A R. C. MEETING 3/0/7V • Public Works Department _ Engineering Division 4raffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department ,Id rdOP�F(S�RG�NETAP'�LIC�I�I�PdI}�EVIEI�SCOPPP I ATT�OPJ SNOL'LD BE PROVIDED CONFERENCE (ARC) TO $E HELD ON AM IN TE TID 1„j • F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISIONAT 9�00 REPRESENTATIVEHWILLENOTRBEUABLE TOE ATTTENDUTHEE ON ARC, EAS PROVIDE THE- COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° /3o/79 1 REVVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :_ At Approved Approved with conditions Not Ap prOved - - _� 7/7 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :_ Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved lam. -1 _s �-2 c Signature of Director or ' Gthorized Representative •- / Date REV-SEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : r? �CF-488-79 FOR KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION, R-392-79 , SP-407-79 CONDITIONS FOR DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • 1 . The only permitted use of the site is for a medical professional office building . 2 2 . Setbacks - No building or structures shall be permitted within (a ) forty (40) feet from S . W . Sunset Boulevard ( State Road #2 ) ( b ) within thirty (30) feet of the northerly property line ; within thirty ( 30 ) feet of S . W . 3rd Place ; and within thirty ( 30) feet of 80th Avenue South . 3 . Landscaping/Buffer Areas - The first thirty (30) feet adjacent to the northerly property line shall be appropriately landscaped to provide a dense evergreen screen . The first fifteen ( 15 ) feet adjacent to S . W. Sunset Boulevard , and the first ten ( 10) feet adjacent to S . W . 3rd Place and 80th Avenue South shall be appropriately landscaped . Detailed landscape plans for the entire site development shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development review. 4. Height Limitation - Building or structure shall exceed a height of twenty-five (25 ) feet . 5. Access to the site shall be controlled with signed traffic safety along Sunset Boulevard and adjacent residential streets , potential impacts to the Y ' /FINAL .DECLARATION OF 4 ,C7f0 /4tv4NON—S I GN I F I CANCE Application No . R-392-79 SP-407-79 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 488-79 X� FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Requested rezone from R-1 to R-3 and special permit to allow development of the site with a professional office structure. Proponent KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION Location of Proposal Between 80th Ave So & S .W. 3rd Pl ; north of S .W. sunset Blvd. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPT. This proposal has been determined to ® have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma-de after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : Pursuant to attached conditions , in the form of restrictive covenants . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : • Responsible Offi ial GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title P ING RECT Date SEPTEMBER 14, 1979 Signatur / City of Renton . Planning Department 5-76 47) 610,, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE FIELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 18 , 19 79 , AT 9 : C0 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . KOHL AND CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3 , File R-392-79; • property located on S . W . Sunset Blvd ( SR-900) between 80th Ave . So. and S . W. 3rd Pl . (81st Ave . So. ) . 2. KOHL AND CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IN R-3 ZONE , File SP-407-79 ; property located on S .W. Sunset Blvd ( SR-900) between 80th Ave. So. , and S.W. 3rd P1 . (81st Ave.. So. ) 3. IRVING W. HULL , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM .R-3 TO R-4 , File R-394-79; property located at 421 Burnett Ave. So. 4. DR. ANDREW DEAK, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO P-1 , File R-405-79 ; property located at 4509 Talbot Rd . So. 5 .. DR. ANDREW DEAK, APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO DEVELOP PARKING LOT IN P- 1 ZONE FOR PARKING LOT FOR ADJOINING MEDICAL FACILITY , File SA-406-79 ; property located at 4509 Talbot Rd. So. 6. BILL HEATH , APPLICATION FOR FOUR-LOT SHORT ''PLA,T APPROVAL , File.;, 401-79; AND APPLICATION FOR_,,EXCEPTION EXCEPTION TO .SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, REGARDING.,. STREET ''WIDTH AND CONSTRUCTION OF CURBS AND,. • SIDEWALKS , File E-408-79 ; property located in the vicinity of 1303 N . 26th St. • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 18, _1979 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO EMPRESS THEIR OPINIONS: PUBLISHED p GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Se t.e.uier 7 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THEABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to befo;•e me , a Notary Public , .. on the 5th uav of Sept 1979 —. - SIGNED 4 . f r , . _�.. ,.r. . ] C LO I pi."EM-Q -31 TV 17 01 Of tj 777 It zz --------------- � " KOHL & CHRTSTTANSON ADDITION R-392-79 SP-407-79 � � � � AppLl CAN T KOHL & CHRI5TIANSUN ADDITION TOTAL AREA ±I,3 acres Via S.W. Sunset Blvd. PRINCIPAL �[[L�6_______ [Xl6l |NG Z()NlNG_ R-1, Single Faoi iaI [XlST { NG USE Undeveloped PRoP()SLD 'USE Professional Office Structure COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE P\'AN Low Density Multi-Family ' COMMENTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : KOHL & CHRIST'IANSON� ADDITION , File Nos : R-392-79 SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 SP-407-79 PAGE five 3 . Landscaping/Buffer Areas - The first thirty to, the northerly property line shall be app (30) feet ately laadndscaped . to provide a dense evergreen screen . Thefirs �t fifteen (�15) ed feet adjacent to S . W . Sunset Boulevard , and the first ten ( 10) feet adjacent to S . W. 3rd Place and 80th Avenue South shall be appropriately landscaped . Detailed landscape plans for the entire site development shall be submitted to and a proved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development review. 4. Height Limitation - Building or structure shall exceed a height of twenty-five (25) feet . 5. Access to the site shall be controlled with signed traffi safety along Sunset Boulevard and e adjacent residential streets , potential impacts to the The staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the request for a special permit as well , File No : SP-407-79 , subject to the above conditions . i.— • —. Hy HHy uwpa f" LIIIt:H L DEVE Pi1ENT APPLICATION REVIEW I ET . Application : /9 '0'".; 7, . . .'/Zm t 'IL 4. , Location : 7j 5 .Sconsoi'3/ lie g� at Applicant :SALItliaftAkAm9o . e/14 401 TO : Par s Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : '/07q Police Department A. R. C. MEETING V /e71 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department WqNrFMGRTARAMPIRVIMSCRREKMAM918�OP SHOULD PROVIDED E (ARC) TO PE HELD ON 1 ?9 AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE NOUF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTENDTHE ARC' PEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: O0 PM ON 1,30 9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved /" Signature_of Directo-r or ,:4uthorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : — Approved y;° Approved with conditions Not Approved P/& ____A 1; `i - , 7 - 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date r DEVE-- - -PMENT APPLICATION REVIEW-, IT Application : 14-20,1e �f' �� • �� ,1 ' Location : at toe49 Applicant : Al® a r.,11r1sli®sonvois3 611,1' ;ate TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : �D �' l a� Police Department A. R. C. MEETING /W0/75? • Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering B 1 ding Division • Utilities Engineering Fire Department IN E-S RFS GGESTIONS REGARDING THIS A'P ICcATT .01 SHOULD 3 p OVIDED LICATION REVW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO �E HELD ON � I AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE KUUNI F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESEN TATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTENDTHE ARC, P EAS PROVIDE THE , COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 PM ON 130 t`.s REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /jre Approved , ' 1/ Approved with conditions Not Approved /ez- ;ef//":�' ///iG SC` /f 7u /125 ./4/s Lc/1-7-1:)c%-"' i t) i.c.s7i t�i f�7 /'� /mac�� lc r� i� G,riai ,eeccfie_i C f-1C ri C� J=Go�v /'-tie : . /ci/LiJ/4-'G :� 5� rE l CehOe n P/S/77 Signature ofsDirector or uthori a Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved • (A),4 re-a,M'?IN Ex 7,—c nlS'c' dS L✓ L- azzi Ltl('2.0 e, 3 t'-i E Fr 2c {/5,--..o..4 7S Posse w- LJ'c:- C r 'i-- Cw 5)2 /7 ignature of Director or Authorized Representative Date / it \ . \ 1-...ii1ti-' 1 .1 '"IL'i --_ A•-.... , ; ii • i .11 .5.-. 11- ;',Itii.., ..). -i. „_...-2---, .:.-..,,,,,i....:;i,,,,:,; • i: \- :: _ Ii ..,./_,. . ,,:,..,,,,,,z//,,....41/ •,. • .k ...'s--...., [.-..--_;,:z-.-7 --7 1--1---',•;//-1,-.-;—'.,:1,,d , -1 \ ••—i-- --- •.- -- ' —'t::-."1-.' i / 1 .1 . \ ../.....-, /... — 7 — '.--..: • ... ..,- \ \I \ \•. ..../ . ...... .. _. h • -• , N. .; ) ' $„\C\ • , e.1 - 04 . ,.....,...:: . • ,,.:. , ',. _,.., .....__.. , -., -)- ;7-t, ' .' • \\ r....p----:37. c.-...:_- ,L.."..T7117 ( //././1 i 1 '.. /1 4".6 „ ..1:.*1..._.\\ • \ ! ....3• t, h.„ '..7.r.:=-_ ::_ i= \t:::----1'-•\ ..,.-: :::•-• ri-::- Oi 1 I 7 „ ••• .4 ' :. .i '\-.7... ...s.-•. .9 • ... ., i',_ ,i/ . .46,‘„,.., \\ •..1 \ u---...... ' •-- • /1--.,_ :(?):----. ----t-1-z:-....--...- ..=:-.„:--...._ .../ , --.. . •S‘ i • %4/ .\ E i' !___.\ ,\..:, ----"'"` -s.' •".' / • • , ...----. `• . \‘"••;-7';..,.-ii,7----- \t „......... . . ___.:7_,. ..,..__ . , tz.k \•• ` •. - / • --. ,..7. a .. \ s ., .. .... ....-. ,/' -41-,.. .,„, '•`. .: \' c. ) . • ' / \•"ii'.- • \*\'' C' 45" :",• is, al • .*". ' "'•?1,...:: >, ., ':11- - .4.— — 4 1 • • / /' • - ‘ • N ‘,\ . • . . , ,,, .. , ., .. ... , (......;\ , ., ...... • ' • / ' ' :-• ', \ . . /.' ) /- (1-•) > • \ ‘•- r------ ----1--------_/ / • . fis . . \ .., . 1.1.'/,/. .... '.• :,; , \ \ / i •. ' '// .i ., s ' ..•. , // I ; • \ V . I \ I •;;--.:-',..,.:7"."'"•••• i; i ' r ti... s. r - • • .-- 7.' I ' l / i II' :.' , > ' .' ./..'• [7.),/,) •. ..•...% 4 . • \ • . i . ../h:: ,1,/,'• '‹' . ...•. ..• .‘. '.• i /1...7 2 ' / ..... 0 • .\ .. :: . • ...::;....:.::::.•;::/ ......... '. ( / / „,•.;:'-..%. /. . . • . . . •'. 7 N. ' ; i LX ''' / ...'.14:2).=, ..' • • • • .„, ...". " • ','''''''' ti \ / ,\ .• / / i's)../•\ .1 , r .- 4 ..--. • / /. ......-, .. / ./ .• .• ,• . '3:i ( l',. ..-". .. / .`‘,. . '" / / • ,/ , ,,..,-•.f., ,.0' / ••.' 's ••• ''' • •••••:•0 /. • ., • / /,,,• .''\ ,/' ,• ' • I ih • % •• / , N.,' •:' /. / . • . s Y ' • , . / . / •• /I , / ,• ... -.."'----.- ) \. s . ,• .•).. ' ...9// . • -• / '- ,s\ , 5 *.... .\s .7../ V ,„,..:.: C2 / ‘ • . // '''( '. ) N` ‘.% /.7' ) \\ . //'') nC .'NS'.',..1.•,„. t.s1 . ..S':). s'.. itif . \Y NKIl . . /.,./. -..' , . ... s. .., ,.k„, ) . i. • •( ....,, , •,. • • •..':, .. . . .../ o > _, , ,, / . .• \-,,•••, • i \ • . •''''' • 'NH.//.':•' • - •• .r., -• 17 • el:/ / ' ' , * .• ...,; •..' , ‘:." . ....- .. .. ..:- . •-.. P--/.....:,/ -311 / i .' .''''' . .' .., :•\• \, ..,'..<,.. ..,,'.:•s,,5.,...,z.,:r...iii.:. \...'.7 ,‘",'!..'..//, ' ) / . .••it / ;1/ /..... . . ii. .'i. f • - -,,' '.' • ' ,,,,: .• i ' - • / 6\ i •.?••. ,,,, / • -,„..: . • \.:-.- -,',..:-.*-- • ., co I .:-•- / 'I'l i 1 4 .v: %., .. •••• - • •• . / !—I sf'..1 . , • , .---,.., , • . /// / 18. '4 t ) ..._.- 'i ,. / •• • //1, 4 z,. \;,.:• .:.,V .... _ ft . gti 1 ilel • • :.,,, N _ \• 7, ) / l'• •', . / ‘,. \ -, : • i ( , % ,TANN%IA ' l':-.:'. ' 7 'i / si•-.9 • ;, . •• •c\• z, , ---, .1'. 1.4 • '..\ . /( /49°'>e •.... t \ 1 4:•° -... 'I, 1 \\I . ' ''.c.i: . . ..-1------. 7./ ) ! .• '-.' I :. i . ..„,., •Vi•.. ,- . q•-• 112.4).. ":\... O.... --. , • N. - / ,..... - /1/1 • .... .. . . . • / . t• i—i 01.. . '0,s, ..... 4. r • - - • - Fi r•- 1-1 cM 1--- , •• - .. • ri'lf ' / . .%, . - . f./ • it.,.. ... t'' ir ., . . . . . <4 -zi• . • ... - . :• •1?.) / 's. ''-•'•.-:.: ..• / . / . • i• Z . • 1 / . , . . . • • • • C/9 (1)f214/ . - ), 1 . . .. . 1.. . , . . •. , Z •'• • ' — 1 .*•• •• ''N • — • . . <4 7dr --.I,'•• • •• NN • • N/i. ' • i. E--. /g :•,••i. .e.. 14!, ' • . 1/ s ••• / Ci) cd 1-1 ••+,11'' • c:4 = U CA 1.-- ,-.1 c:r•I . 0 1 . c4 • . • i . • • • . . . .. . .. . . -...,. il i • DEVE PENT APPLICATION REVI,EV i ET Application : '. 2aere&- (R . 3? 7?) ii , to -. ; r« I Location : ® a , e,�,,• ye,. 0 /ee B.50/ Applicant : KoA B cAr/S ,�Q , 41�° eP+ TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: V4,75F Police' Department A, R. C. MEETING / �375P • Public Works Department _ Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department OTRFRIRTARIEMPIRVINSCENEWIAMIUM WUM pROV1DED C) _TO BE HELD ON`7`, AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ' I YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATT ND THE ARC, P aS PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PM ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :_ A/ Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved i � ‘2-Dff47/77 Signature of -Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :_ 1).. j) — — — ix! Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved - g ° //'/ � , —�'=��_ram r, 1 5 / c Signature of Director or ` Gthorized Representative Date REV-IIWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I _,CF-488-79 - FOR KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION, R-392-79, SP-407-79 •CONDITIONS FOR DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • ` I • 1 . The only permitted use of the site is for a medical professional office building . 2 . Setbacks - No building or structures shall be permitted within (a ) forty (40 ) feet from S . W. Sunset Boulevard ( State Road #2 ) ( b ) within thirty (30) feet of the northerly property line ; within thirty (30 ) feet of S . W. 3rd Place; and within thirty ( 30 ) feet of 80th Avenue South . 3' Landscaping/Buffer Areas - The first thirty (30) feet adjacent to the northerly property line shall be appropriately landscaped to provide a dense evergreen screen . The first fifteen ( 15 ) feet adjacent to S . W . Sunset Boulevard , and the first ten ( 10) feet adjacent to S . W . 3rd Place and 80th Avenue South shall be appropriately landscaped . Detailed landscape plans for the entire site development shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of site development review. 4. Height Limitation - Building or structure shall exceed a height of twenty-five (25 ) feet . 5. Access to the site shall be controlled with signed traffic safety along Sunset Boulevard and potential impacts to the adjacent residential streets . • IMMMSEMO/FINAL -DECLARATION OF K /NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-392-79 SP-407-79 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 488-79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Requested rezone from R-1 to R-3 and special permit to allow development of the site with a professional office structure. Proponent KOHL & CHRISTIANSON ADDITION Location of Proposal Between 80th Ave So & S .W. 3rd Pl ; north of S .W. Sunset Blvd. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPT. This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is al is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was mase after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information or-I. -file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : Pursuant to attached conditions , in the form of restrictive covenants . • Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : • • Responsible Offi , ial GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title P ilgING RECT Date SEPTEMBER 14 , 1979 Signatur ,/ / City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE FIELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 18 , 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . KOHL AND CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3 , File R-392-79 ; property located on S . W . ,Sunset Blvd ( SR-900) between 80th Ave . So. and S . W. 3rd P1 . ( 81st Ave . So. ) . 2 . KOHL AND CHRISTIANSON ADDITION , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PROFESSIONAL OFFICE IN R-3 ZONE , File SP-407-79 ; property located on S .W. Sunset Blvd ( SR-900) between 80th Ave. So. , and S .W. 3rd P1 . (81st Ave, So. ) 3. IRVING W. HULL , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM .R-3 TO R-4 , File R-394-79 ; property located at 421 Burnett Ave. So. 4. i DR. ANDREW DEAK, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO P-1 , File R-405-79 ; property located at 4509 Talbot Rd . So . 5 .. DR. ANDREW DEAK, APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO DEVELOP PARKING LOT IN P- 1 ZONE FOR PARKING LOT FOR ADJOINING MEDICAL FACILITY , File SA-406-79 ; property located at 4509 Talbot Rd. So. 6 . BILL 'HEATH , APPLICATION FOR FOUR-LOT SHORT -PLAT APPROVAL , File' 401-79; -AND APPLICATION FOR;, 'v EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE , REGARDL-NG;, STREET ''WIDTH AND CONSTRUCTION OF CURBS AND, - SIDEWALKS , File E-408-79 ; property located in the vicinity of 1303 N . 26th St. • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 18A1.979 AT 9:00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED September 7 , 1979__ GORDON V. ERICKSENRENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR 11 CERTIFICATION 1 I!, SvE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN TdREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES li ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to befoe me , a Notary Public , • ' on the 5th tay of Sept. ' , . 1979 - SIGNED ,ei7 . r� '` --- r