Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-427 (2) Exhibit C Environmental Checklist September 5, 1980
Christopher brown p.c.
!la- 9688 rainier avenue a
sgattle washing9on
to,7234567 8118
•
VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK
• v- . RECEIVED
ENGINEERING DEPT.
�+3
MAR 141980
•
THE AUSTIN COMPANY
Traffic Studies
•
•
•
•
•
•
• March - January
•
1980•
1_4 •r
•
fi
+ \'•.
Christopher Brown �e
9688 rainier avenue a
s attle washington
V� to 7234567 98118
, March 14, 1980
Mr. Jake Fox
The Austin Company
800 S.W. 16th Street
Renton, WA 98 055
Re: Valley Office &Industrial Park
Traffic Studies
Dear Mr. Fox:
I am attaching the two traffic :studies concerning current
vehicular transportation issues and traffic ..characteristics
associated with the street system serving the 'proposed
Valley Office and Industrial Park.
The first study, completed last 'January, bound at the back
of the report addresses transportation considerations,
currently adopted municipal improvement programs, .and ele-
ments associated with trip generation, trip distribution,
capacity constraints- :and potential mitigating measures: that
can be adopted for the full development of the Valley. Office
and Industrial Park.
The second study, placed at the front of the report,: focuses
attention primarily on "incremental loading". In this case,
incremental loading is 'construed to mean the 'implementation
of other office buildings identical •to .that: recently con-
structed. Further, this second study addresses capacity. '
constraints on Lind Avenue primarily associated with :the -
intersection of Grady Way and also the bridge crossing
Interstate 405.
The latter study notes that traffic signals will not be
required at the intersection of Lind Avenue and 16th :until
after a second office building is completed.. Also, adequate
capacity exists on the bridge over Interstate 405 if a second
office building is completed. However, intersection improve-
ments will be necessary at Grady Way and Lind Avenue ;if a
second office building is undertaken. Such improvements:
include roadway widening and redesign of signal systems.'
r
Mr. Jake Fox
March 14, 1980
page two
If a third office building is constructed, there will be
insufficient bridge capacity. The bridge over Interstate
405 will need to be widened to four lanes or alternatively
another bridge constructed in order to relieve this
"bottle-neck".
Essentially, on the basis of our studies we feel confident
that you can implement a second offic building without sub-
stantial investments on the road system. However, following
the implementation of a second building, substantial invest-
ments will be required if adequate capacity is to be met in
the absence of other mitigating measures aimed at reducing
peak, private auto travel.
If you have any questions with respect to the report, please
feel free to contact us.
Yours ul
C. V. Brown, P.E.:
CVB/ap
ele,)
christopher brown
rt-e, 9688 rainier avenue s.
Seattle washin•ton
tel:7234567 •:118 I
VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK
Existing Traffic Characteristics
Signal Warrant Analysis
Incremental Capacities
March 1980
THE AUSTIN COMPANY
VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK
Existing Characteristics
Existing or current transportation characteristics are
important in that they provide the fundamental parameters
associated with the development of future or projected
peak hour traffic demands.
Traffic characteristics associated with the existing office
building constructed for the Boeing Company by the Austin
Company on Lind Avenue S.W. south of 16th Street were gathered
from on-site, field observations taken during the week of
March 3 - 7, 1980. Estimates of the total work force presently
on-site were provided by staff of the Austin Company. Summary
transportation characteristics are described as follows.
Total work force 1,400 (March, 1980)
Future work force 1, 600
A.M. Inbound vehicular demand 1,129 (6:00 - 8:30)
A.M. Outbound vehicular demand 35
P.M. Inbound vehicular demand 81 (3:35 - 6:10)
P.M. Outbound vehicular demand 1,086
Both a.m. and p.m. vehicular movements generate a significant
peak hour demand within the peak time frame. These are :
A.M. (6:30 - 7 :30) from the north 438 vehicles/hour
from the south 176 vehicles/hour
P.M. (4:00 - 5:00) to the north 386 vehicles/hour
to the south 153 vehicles/hour
Non-vehicular traffic observed in the afternoon included :
Pedestrians 53
Bicyclists 12
Motorcyclists 2
From a sample of 253 vehicles, vehicular occupancy was deter-
mined at:
Driver only vehicles 83%
Driver plus one passenger 15%
Driver plus two passengers 2%
Occupancy - 1.182 persons/vehicle
(Seattle CBD occupancy = 1.21 persons/vehicle)
-1-
r
Considering "passengers" against the total work force, such
ridership amounts to about 15.4 percent. Note that the
Boeing Company currently reports ridership in the order of
27 percent at other facilities. The higher ridership at
other sites is principally due to familiarity with the system.
This is expected to be achieved as the new office building
matures;
Vehicular flow rates in 15-minute increments are described
below.
TABLE I
•
A.M. PEAK HOUR
INBOUND DEMAND -
Time From North From South
6:00 - 6 :15 40 16
6 :15 54 - 22
6 :30 118 47
6:45 141 57
7:00 90 36
7 :15 89 36
7 :30 102 41
7 :45 54 22
8:00 63 25
8:15 - 8: 30 54 22
Total accumulation 1129 vehicles
Outbound demand, insignificant
Note : Some construction activity still present on-site.
Above vehicles include construction and utility vehicles.
TABLE II
P.M. PEAK HOUR
INBOUND AND OUTBOUND DEMAND
Time Outbound Inbound
NB SB Both DDirT ections
3:35 - 3:45 5 0 1
3:45 49 7 11
4:00 87 34 9
4 :15 92 18 20
4 :30 152 78 10
4:45 55 23 6
5:00 55 19 3
5:15 92 19 6
5:30 118 88 7
5:45 44 16 4
6:00 - 6:10 26 9 4
-2-
4
Parking accumulation during the working day was obtained by
counting vehicles parked at three separate time intervals.
Accumulation was determined at :
11 :00 a.m. 1,220 vehicles
1:00 p.m. 992 vehicles
2:00 p.m. 1,185 vehicles
Average accumulation was 1,132 vehicles.
Note that vehicles on the parking lot included those asso-
ciated with construction and utility systems.
Non-vehicular demand during the afternoon was observed between
2:00 and 6:00 p.m. The data, from Wednesday, March 5 is
described below.
TABLE III
NON-VEHICULAR DEMAND
Time Bicycles Pedestrians
2 :15 - 2 :30 0 ' 0
2: 30 1 0
2 :45 1 1
3:00 2 1
3:15 2 1
3:30 1 4
3:45 1 1
4 :00 0 1
4:15 0 18
4: 30 0 8
4:45 0 8
5:00 1 0
5:15 2 6
5:30 1 2
5:45 - 6: 00 0 2
Total 12 53
Two motorcyclists were observed. One motorcyle included two
riders.
Pedestrian and bicyclist activity appears to account for 4.6
percent of the work force.
In concert with car pools, non-driver related employees
amount to almost 20 percent of the work force.
-3-
Note that at the present time there are virtually no ped-
estrian amenities or facilies either on Lind Avenue or on
the overcrossing of Interstate 405. Indeed, the lack of
adequate pedestrian facilities on the Interstate 405 over-
crossing may constitute a fundamental hazard. This should
be brought to the attention of both the City of Renton and
the Washington State Department of Transportation.
Traffic Signals
Traffic signals can only be installed at the intersection of
two roads if traffic signal "warrants " have been satisfied.
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and
Highways , published by the U.S. Department of Transportation,
FederalHighway Administration (1971) was adopted by Resolution
No. 2490, Order No. 132, on March 20, 1972 by the Washington
State Highway Commission in accordance with Chapter 47.36 of
the Revised Code of Washington which grants such authority to
the Highway Commission.
The newest Department of Transportation publication has revised
the above document (1978) although, for all intents and
purposes, traffic signal warrants remain identical (except
for Warrant 6) . The titles are self-explanatory. These are:
Warrant 1, Minimum Vehicular Volume
Warrant 2, Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Warrant 3, Minimum Pedestrian Volume
Warrant 4, School Crossing
Warrant 5, Progressive Movement
Warrant 6, Accident Experience
Warrant 7, Systems Warrant
Warrant 8, Combination of Warrants
'For the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S. 16th Street
we consider Warrants 3, 4, 5, and 7 to be non-applicable.
Further, we do not believe Warrant 6 has been met. This is
particularly important since the subject intersection has
been recently been modified to a "4-way STOP" .
The two applicable warrants are "Minimum Vehicular Volume"
and "Interruption of Continuous Traffic". ' Briefly, Warrant 1
requires 600 vehicles per hour (total both approaches) on the
main stream and 150 vehicles per hour on the minor approach.
Warrant 2 , conversely , requires a demand of 900 vph, total
both approaches, on the main stream and 75 vehicles per hour
on the minor stream. These volumes must be reached for 8 hours.
-4-
•
• d
Currently, traffic volumes between 6:00 in the morning and
6:00 in the evening are:
Time Total Main Stream Minor Approach
6-7 123 51
7-8 477 120
8-9 388 123
12-1 358 90
1-2 460 134
2-3 385 141
3-4 568 163
4-5 620 336 (warrant met)
-5-6 455 449
* Note : Time interval 9 :00 a.m. - 12 :00 excluded from
study as non-significant.
At the moment, traffic signal warrants are not satisfied.
Indeed,. only one hour of the mandatory eight hours is met.
Probably, traffic signal warrants will not be met at the
subject intersection until traffic volumes are increased by
about 60 to 70 percent.
Before concluding this portion on "signal warrants" a final
comment might be in order. The operation of the existing
traffic signal at Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way consists
of three distinct "phases". Boosting the capacity of this
intersection will require the institution of bot!. intersection
widening and the incorporation of an additional phase. In any
case, a multiple phase signal at this intersection will
be in contrast to a 2-phased signal at the intersection of
Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 16th Street. This, in turn, makes
appropriate coordination extremely difficult. In turn, this
will make the linkage operate less efficiently. It should be
noted at the present time that the traffic signal at Lind and
Grady Way (during the evening peak hour) is the significant
bottleneck , 'and not the capacity of the present 4-way STOP
installation at Lind and 16th. The latter intersection has a
capacity of 2,800 vph (with balanced demand) and 2,280 vph
(with unbalanced demand) with capacity expressed in terms of
the total capacity all legs. It feeds all that Grady Way can take.
During the lowest hour of the eight highest hours of the day,
the present office facility contributes 237 vehicles to the
traffic stream. However, of the necessary 600 vehicles per
hour demand required on the mainline for signal warrants, an
existing shortfall of 242 vehicles exist. If another facility
of equal size were constructed with access on Lind Avenue,
such a facility would only contribute an additional 237
vehicles per hour, at the most, during the lowest hour of the
eight highest hours of the day. Again, this is not quite
-5-
sufficient to bring the subject intersection in line with
signal warrants. Thus, it may be concluded, that even if a
second, identical facility were constructed, traffic signal
warrants would not quite be met.
This should not be construed to mean that a traffic signal
would not be required. A traffic signal may be required in
order to produce safe and efficient traffic operations during
the peak hours. However, from a legal frame, traffic signal
Warrant 1 or 2 will not be satisfied. Likely, reliance would
need to be placed on another warrant. Also , as noted earlier,
consideration must be given with respect to potential opera-
tions on the entire linkage between S.W. 16th Street and
Grady Way.
In the interim, it is sufficient to state that traffic signal
warrants will, not be met even with the implementation of a
second office facility.
Traffic Operations - Second Facility
Given the implementation of a second office facility with
characteristics identical to those of the system presently
in place, an estimate of traffic operations can be made
given no changes to the present street or signal configuration.
At the present time, 15-minute, total intersection demand at
Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way can be stated in terms
of present demand versus surplus capacity at "saturation
flow" rates. With today's traffic this is :
Time Demand Surplus Capacity*
3:00 - 3:15 424 268
3:15 505 187
3:30 664 28
3:45 650 42
4 :00 692 0
4 :15 627 65
4: 30 644 48
5:00 569 123
5:15 577 115
5:30 608 84
5:45 456 236
6:00 654 38
*Surplus is based on saturation flow with Level of Service F.
-6-
r
Nbte that the above table does not include the potential
impacts from the recently completed O/W office facility
on Grady Way one block west of Raymond Avenue. This office
facility will contribute an additional 109 vehicles per hour
between 3:00 and 4 :00, 112 vehicles per hour between 4:00
and 5 :00, and 45 vehicles per hour between 5:00 and 6:00.
Consequently, surplus capacity will be reduced between 3:00
and 6 :00 to: 416, 124, and 428 vph. Over a three-hour
interval, there is sufficient surplus capacity to accommodate
projected northbound demands from a second office facility
provided the peak hour is distributed over a full three
hours as opposed to the present two and one-half hours.
Further, it is also based on substandard Levels of Service
(F) . With changes in geometry, this quality of traffic flow
can be boosted to Level of Service "C".
Incremental Capacity
Incremental loadings are proposed assuming uniform increases
in employment of 1,600 persons per facility. Given current
ridership patterns, including transit usage, inbound and
outbound vehicular demand will amount to 1,280 vehicles per
facility.
During the p.m. peak time frame the northbound demand will
amount to 910 vehicles and, assuming a similar distribution
as presently existing, the evening peak hour will increase
by 453 vph. This will be followed by a secondary peak hour
amounting to 362 vehicles per hour. The peak hour is ex-
pected to commence at about 4 :00 and end at about 6:00
although some additional movements will take place before
and after these times.
Each additional increment, thereafter, will add a similar
demand to the system.
Note that a substantial data delimitation exists. It is
most unlikely that incremental loadings in terms of total
employment will maintain uniform ridership levels. As
employment levels increase, alternate modes of travel will
be selected. Indeed, the "modal split" will change. Likely,
transit and car pool ridership will increase substantially.
Perhaps by an additional 20 percent.
However, for the 2nd increment, it is assumed that the
peak hour will increase by 453 vehicles per hour during the
heaviest peak hour. Essentially, for each new increment,
we are assuming that the modal split remains unchanged. For
capacity purposes, it is assumed that the south leg of the
intersection of Grady and Lind Avenue is widened to provide
a 3-lane approach. Further , the righthand or third, lane has
-7-
a length of about 380 feet.. The north leg of the intersec-
tion is assumed to be widened to 30 feet in order to allow
unhindered turning movements. Finally, it is also assumed
that Grady Way has not yet been developed to a 5-lane section
but aht 3-lane program by O/W Properties (approved by the
City of Renton, March 1980) will be completed. This widened
roadway does not change the characteristics of the west
approach. Finally, for the second increment, the sigfial
system is rebuilt--at least in terms of signal control to
provide a 4-phase operation.
Figure 1, next page, portrays the relative capacity of
existing and incremental developments expressed in terms of
a flow rate on the south leg of the intersection of Grady
Way and Lind Avenue for the northbound direction. Increment
1 is the projected demand and also the available capacity
when the existing office facility is fully occupied. Note
the changes in signal operation per attached capacity cal-
culations.
Increment 2 assumes the development of a second office build-
ing. Again, available capacity exists at the bridge although
intersection improvements will be required in order to develop
capacity at Grady Way. Increment 3 considers a third office
building. In this case, the capacity of both the bridge and
the intersection are exceeded.
To summarize the impacts of proposed building programs, it
can be stated that the implementation of a second office
building can be accommodated with the existing roadway
network, complete with the existing bridge, although minor
modifications will be required on Lind Avenue between 16th
and Grady Way. Typically, such modifications include inter-
section widening.
For a third office building, alternative strategies must be ,
pursued including either bridge widening on Lind Avenue or
the construction of an additional facility discussed previously.
Conclusions
With respect to the proposed Valley Office and Industrial
Park developments, it may be concluded:
1. Traffic signals will not be warranted at the inter-
section of 16th and Lind Avenue on completion of a
second office facility.
2. Traffic signals will probably be warranted if a
third office building is constructed.
-8-
2978 "....._-___________--Bridge widened to 4 lanes, Capacity. . .2978 vph ' N.R.
•
•
•
Existing
1470 - 4... •
- •ri. Bridge Capacity, 2 Lane
g
Grady Way @ Lind, Capacity
1223 o - - - -— :a•,
z w/ 3 Lane Approach
•
'''' Note: Facility refers to
'r ?'>•.' Austin Office
`':``' r Building @ Lind &
a
Ca aciY
t is
P for
w •:......-TTii- • ••••••••••••a
;# Level of Service 'C'
::a
w :;:
:r: '�$
:< •
Hi---- :::::i:.f...
;;x is
W :i:i
•••'
:?J:
. ••' PE gag• + is
::: r't: ?:; iiY
,�::yi 4•}:•: is S
0
a •
>1 >
4-, 4i,.
W Pi 0� ›-ia
•
w w cn •� yr
•
a a.o wo w °
-� .."1 >, •o .
• w ww via Hg4
FIGURE 1
-9-
3. The capacity of the existing bridge crossing Interstate
405 is sufficient to accommodate projected demands
from a second office building.
4. The intersection of Lind Avenue and Grady Way should
be improved to provide a 3-lane (northbound) approach
if adequate levels of service are to be maintained
with existing facilities in place and fully operating.
In the interim, traffic can function during the peak
hour although not at high levels of service.
5. The implementation of a second office building in
concert with intersection improvements at Lind Avenue
and Grady Way will not adversely impact traffic con-
ditions. Widening the north and south legs of the
intersection to provide three lane approaches will
ensure adequate levels of service. The signal
controllhr will need to be replaced.
6. The implementation of a third office building will
produce traffic volumes in excess of both inter-
section and bridge capacity. Alternate strategies
will need to be explored for accommodating such
traffic.
7. The implementation of a third office building should
be sufficient cause to mandate transit service to or
thru the site and, because of this, produce a reduc-
tion in peak hour traffic demands. Possibly, a
third building can be- accommodated with appropriate
geometric revisions and maintaining the existing
bridge if the current modal split is improved.
-10-
•
•
•
•
APPENDIX
CAPACITY CAPCULATIONS
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
CAPACITY ANALYSIS .Ps7 226 9,4_
•, . / i q{
li
PROJECT /4l/f��/t/ ,&_r'7 17 ' o/r/ G7O _ -Ai • -a
INTERSECTION �� / '2 1//`7.
tle) �, L
BASIC CONDITIONS') 1 t
METRO POPULATION_fLJv `� it. . PHF 0•'.7 1 � J,•NotE
AREA: COD 0BD HELD,/RESID RURAL® 1 Cods One I
re
C • SIGNAL CYCLE .r SEC. A/C s/ /.D,.:;s . .. .
PHASE I PHASE PHASE PHASE
J
_
•
t �4 -._
m a ^� ! r
QD W
m
Q
Q Q
G/C = 0'9, 1 9 G/C =6./0 9 G/C = t3, G/C = 0.0?
G = SEC. SEC G = SEC SEC G = SEC SEC. G = SEC SSEEC.
APPROACH T= 1 % R= 7 L:/(' BUS STOP _/'
MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY T
FEET REFERENCE REQ'D USED Cp Cp DHV REMARKS
/ - 5`y O y ti s 5.P d y a
_ —A, /2 <j' D,/' 0.3 / h� '72 o zy
APPROACH . . T= / % R. % LeV% BUS STOP ///MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY DHV 4
FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CD Cp REMARKS s
• N /2 a 6• o. '
.Fs'l
w-f /2� `/ 0 2 i/ o y3 lo&Y /2Im 7.9to `` .
APPROACH ..... . •' T= / % R=A % L=/s y BUS STOP iii,
MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY }
FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED Cp Cp DHV REMARKS
C/
r . �! . g 0•09' nb9 . a�=sD � 6 54
,37
—
APPROACH . T= / x R=‘?4 L=/9 % BUS STOP /r/j9-
MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY
FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED Cp Cp DHV a REMARKS
,v- s /2_ f // 0-07 0. Yy .9/c) sue? 9 2
__ f
/7 � D.d, O./o o /S"� dK
/9 O•/�' 0.3y da'1) _7 6 Y20• _
• DESIGNATE EACH APPRUA(:II In I.I:'IIT:N; 1-N UK l-Y (I- UK [-NAY);, PIU:., N.Y. (Ni) PKG.); ENTER DHV'= BY_.__.
T MARK A.M., OR COMP. (Cek1P11SI II I'F.AK.) !
TURN LANE LENGTHS - D2, Ds; I'KUGKS -- Tl, Ts; NIUENI:U AI'PRUACII LENGTHS -- D.. Db. ETC. CHECKED'
es\ /t/o-/e : %/Vic, /
/41'7 c — TS°
D/✓'�rGX/ /��/X = r/o
. ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
CAPACITY ANALYSIS ?1 3 �°
if L
PROJECT ALA-PriA-'' /2C4 '! 4 0 ()•INTERSECTION C' /2 ' — ') ;4 —
,rBASIC CONDITIONS: /G 1 11 .
L..231
69,7 cy
• METRO POPULATION _ PHP 7• NOT
AREA CBD FRING 08D IELOW
RESID RURAL ICode One /� /
C C . SIGNAL CYCLE //OSEC. A/C•..g/h.Lc _
PHASE I PHASE '}., PHASE 5' PHASE l
/
•
fIr
CD
W W �� S
coco 05 a I 2 2
4 a
G/C • 6 .Z._ G/C = p.FJ G/C• is IS— G/C = C5 . 2
G • SEC. SEC G • SEC SEC G = SEC SEC G • SEC SEC.
APPROACH T• ( x R• _ x L= x BUS STOP ...
MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY t
FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CD CP DHV REMARKS
•
P-A, /
P-p /7- 1 y G•72. o 72 /220 /%E/ /227 o.
r- /z
•
APPROACH ..... . Ti / % . R• % • L• % BUS STOP
MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY 1
FT REFERENCE REO'D USED CD Cp
f� DHV REMARKS* I t[
G" _F /1 1 '`71 O. 9a 0•F6 /O90 / oq) /OP7 0A
w - -r /2
APPROACH Ti / s R• x L• x euS STOP ..
MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY 1
FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CD CP DHV REMARKS
-it, h' p f CA- 9S `/20 3et.? CP.
APPROACH T• / is. R• % L•
Y. BUS STOP .
MOVEMENT WA CHART G/C CAPACITY I
FEET REFERENCE REO'D USED CD CP DHV REMARKS
x--w /2 l',4 o.20 P/ lAt, C At, z
Al-s ` /2 C' O./2- o-/i /9a ?2 �' /17 ,liea-C.9/clmr
N-F 11 L . •i A,. /e)i
• OLEIC:NATE EACH API'MO III
HA ILK; I-W uk L-6' (I- OK 2-NAY); PKI:., N.P. (Nu PKC.); ENTER DM1's BY •e' /•t MARK A.M., OR COMP. (COMMISI II PLAN.) -
IMAM LANE LEIR:THS — O_, uj; IMMUCS -- T2. T3; w1DENEU APPICOACH LENGTHS -- Da, Db, ETC. CHECKED ---
tm
` a/ JJ / „d , q •
rp 9[iv•
V grie• /YC- /7 s r 7- 1n0�
\ �a 4'//w sue-- /ghe en,ov" c-i
a c
APPENDIX
FIELD COUNTS
TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMM.ARy
CITY /7 — DATE �C� . .7TDAY_
INTERSECTION OF .//il/3 AND _./cceL.k
R — R► (,HT TURN
TIME T. Cro TO CO—' /'% S— S1!-!:dGHT AHEAD
L - LE 1 TURN
FROM NORTH ON1 FROM SOUTH ON FRC.M C. •r ;i c Rc,M 'NEST ON
TIME
- l}
L S R L S R L S I L S R
3 -p'/S /; 2 1S' 29 1/3 s? 2 p /Y '( y4
/s-- y70 /7 29 CS 8 4'8 // 78_t 294.9( ‘9 7
27 /o 7t , fi? Jo/ i' 12 /L
?•yr- ,!•c- 2? so 7 8° ' 1b 1 8o •rn .2Y
e o /5g .24•6, )3( . /fib 2`'/ ,2 273 7 k !,24,
boy- E7
"6/ 7- V/3.i mom' /7•
4.6-0 - r' B .�/ _ �� �� '.91 1122 ‘4 /2M /57 fill�; 20 . 2'/ 9/ 26 , 26 ,//.6 ' sC.. 8' 7/7( fs7 /'7/ k
y.-yo- Y y1 2 . 2C, 7 21 7Z /01 /4 go_ 7 1 7.C. //
��5 /7 _6 2/ 4 7( 8 { _j7 I1/0y
5 32 o 9S 6- S� a 5G ] 3a 608- get
567 . 736 3/7 ; •; 978._
s:/S /( . 26 2/_ 27 (o ` `�� �2 s'� /o cl_/P/
- --SIf4 5o J/o 6/ 1
g3� �-93 7.7-7// . 3Sb..1'g ' 9I 31 _ 4 _ iCf
TOTAL - ._ I 11li. --1-..:.-
TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY
CI T Y DATE �/ 4"`3- DAY_ ✓ �
INTERSECTION OF AND /6"
R — RIGHT TURN
TIME 2- ?/i TO 7/47 S— STRAIGHT AHEAD
L — LEFT TURN
FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EAST,ON FROM WEST ON
TIME
L SR LSRLSR L S R
—c9,'/ S 31 a3 I a go / I C y ‘. 3 .36 5 //
01;3 o i 3 2 /( /6 2 5/ a 0 4/ /e? .25 cr
: ,3d- a'9 6 /F 25 1 5 3/ / 12 3 : 3 /3 3 5
;K. 3:0 o I // a 9 / 3 // 66 o I o S /ei to-7
#ou.47'o ,4a/ o / 97 77 es,r ism. V a .21 7? 77 /4 c,14,
/hpp ✓o/ i /1`� /77 /a/ - /611
.vo - .3:/s I /3 aF /$ 7 46 o 0 7 I /1 3
PM .3;15'='3:3o 16 39 .261 7 7( '0 Q 3 a
3,30 - 3c' /3 3/ // .271 37 3
3:ys—y,-ad i /i 37 // F y/ b / 8' 33 as i7 9
AI cA fd7la /. 1 313 /36 7/ a 9 c,Ig6 4/ . 36 /0 7 /j 6 2 q ca c>
Opp // £ I • �v9' I 3/7 /37 ' /6 3
y;aa - q{;" I /9 37 1 7 7 S 3s' 5'! /7 IV
PM Li:AC- y;3 01 // 35 7 6 Sy A 3 .o / 112 7 /
30 - 9;ys g 3 / i7 // 0 3 3 Y -7/ /3 /6 o-
Sad / 3 a I s OH s . I • /a - a
'o tor,*i- IIMBIA 6. •I _ '7 33/
of ✓ 4 ' I 3707 WM I 33
Soo -S,'I 111,11M1 /3 I ' El /3 3 /o M
, 241 it/S-s-3a I 1 /? 37
3;36-6';q5 ,S$ /3 /3
► I
t+a t IQii / b =Eh 210 : Iwarm g
T O T A L ro j JI a47 -I En
r TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY
CI T Y P 1 --- DATE/ DAY_P'�e--V—
INTERSECTION OF L/1. 7) AND /6
R — RIGHT TURN
TIME / bah TO .2 •'er3 S— STRAIGHT AHEAD
L — LEFT TURN
4 FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EAST ,ON FR(;M WEST ON
TIME
L SR LSRLSR L S R
/2- /2:76' : 2 2t /` 2 /7 0 6 0 , // / i 2 /
r2!5-- ,Q 30 7 92 , /Z 1 22- / a / 6 /2 /
2 /2:Y0- _ .r , 7 y1 , % -2 21> 0 , 9 2 t
val✓ /.2::-K- tot) / - . �''7 3e? / FQ `
/ . O 2 C - /? 15- . , i _
4 /
._. 4 ko/ 2r2_ /06 , 41 . clo
/'oo-/ir ,/7 27 5-9 ( 2/ 0 I / l° 2° 2C , 7
ix-l.?a S n , 25 . 7 P/ 0 9 /7 , 27 A/.36-i yr 4./0 _Pt }? /7 4 8' , 22 _ 27 2 4-
lim /�y .-2'� , 7 ?2-- /9 j , / 1 /2 1, A
2 9 2 ` -
AJ Po . 992- /21 j p/
.. l • --. .. _-. ._ - T_....... .
---"--- —. .-._.--__ _J f _
TOTAL — —
e iN hristopher brown
` 9688 rainier avenue a
Se attle wasliin to n
11: teb7234567
VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK
Vehicular Transportation Issues
A Traffic Study •
January 1980
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Study, Introduction 1
Employment 1
Transportation Considerations 3
Existing Traffic 3
Projected Improvement Programs • 3
Trip Distribution and Peak Hour Demand 7
Vehicular Demand - Peak Hour 12
Adjacent Developments 12
Horizon Year DDHV 15
Capacity 15
Conclusions 16
Recommendations 18
TABLES
I Employee Residence Distribution 8
II Hourly Variation 10
III Hourly Variation as a % of Average Daily Demand 11
FIGURES _
1 Study Boundary 2
2 1979 A.D.T. 4
3 1979 D.D.H.V. 5
3A P.M. Peak Hour (1979) 6
4 Trip Distribution (% of all trips) 9
5 P.M. Peak Hour Demand (site gen. traffic only) 13
6 Horizon Year D.D.H.V. 14
7 Redefined D.D.H.V. 17
2
VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK
•
Vehicular Transportation Issues
Study, Introduction
The transportation effort discussed in this report concerns
the area generally defined by S.W. 7th Street - SR-167 - S.W.
43rd Street - West Valley Highway. The principal purpose is
to describe current traffic levels, existing constraints,
projected peak traffic demands and estimate the potential
capacity on those highway and arterial facilities leading
into the area in order to assess the ability of the area to
absorb additional, significant employment along with attendant
vehicular travel.
Figure 1 indicates the general study area boundary along
with potential significant employment centers. Note that
Sector "B" is a facility presently nearing completion. *
This office building has 200,000 g.s.f. on 15 acres of
property. Sector "A" could include a similar facility. The
remaining sectors, "C" and "D" have less opportunity. In
particular, Sector "D" may have adverse soil conditions
along with a drainage way which could inhibit an equally
dense employment center although, potentially, the area
could be developed as a business park utilizing, for example,
clustered buildings with random open space.
Employment
For planning purposes, the total area available for develop-
ment is depicted on Figure 1, as previously noted. The 77
acres have a potential building capacity of 1,027 ,000 g.s.f.
Based on the Parkway Plaza Office Building with an employment
density of 7.12 persons/1,000 g.s.f. , maximum employment for
Sectors "A" , "B" , "C" , and "D" would be 8,736 persons.
However, it should be also noted that ranges in employment
density frequently exist. For example, in the Andover Park
area, density extends from:
Minimum 1.04 persons/1,000 g.s.f.
Maximum 13.70 persons/1,000 g.s.f.
Similarly, recognizing that Sector "D" cannot be developed
as densely as others, planning concepts suggest an overall
employment base of eight thousand. Again, this is probably
on the "high side" and is used to present a "worst case".
*Scheduled for occupancy in February-March
Christopher Brown pc
= _ 9688 rainier avenue s.
f,,gttle,washin•ton
tel:7234567 .•:118
TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY
CITY errft5/7 DAIrE _ _2tch DAY__'
INTERSECTION OF 1//L7J AND 1r{
R — RIGHT TURN
TIME ‘..arOAiV TO 9"ei"t4/iI S— STRAIGHT AHEAD
L -- LEFT TURN
• I FROM NORTH ON FROM SOUTH ON FROM EAST ,ON FROM WEST ON
TIME
' +
L SR L SR L R L S R
‘- (76- /it 7 / o } o / 2
G '.Y0 3 _ `2 . 20 ' // . 9 0 0 7 0 j
G'yv-g ys, 4' /94 9/ 9 2/ / OP . 0 5-
� , /VS- 7.04) q //JJ 4I7 , /.' 29 D 0 F t / /2.
/A ��a/ 4'071 /61 37 r € 6 6 /( . .2 0
4p �a/ , _ /oA ,s/ - 38
7: - 7Ic 9' 97 /s f I / I /2 7 / I
7/5--7'!o j 27 o ,I / /7 +J // 2 ?
fri
7'Y°- 7:ys /4 /O7 9` 0 2 7'ys= Da . ‘.‘ 75 // /9 0 I / 7 / 22 /
-.- � . 39 351 a70M531 l/S'. a .� �� .57 7 0
mop ✓t'/. /7 /;D . �
- ? 7ZCf P .21 . / ,I / .2 /P JP 6 /1-
?Yr- P.' ,ZF I . 2/ D 0 /e /P 2 /a
er , p•y( a 21 /2 / /7 o / y // 2 ' /
t c-- ?:as o /9 II ' /9 / I 0 2- 9 /i 0 /`
7V .5, /71/ /O OF .26 7q 02. 1 g q 7, 3
0187 /0 I
TOTAL
,keQsl/?c �rel' !<{ °k—
tom/ J_
. .
•
• . 4 1.-1-.0 co•
........, - .• p ,.. • • = O.;fa
' : '— —..-.1.. ... ••••.;'.:.•! • -...-)•
. • .. I IL, ';'.....) . .....,.. ,....:: • i
4.- ..
.•. .. . - - • lit%
. ,...:'
. .... .
.... 1-•Z
i 0 . . :
''. i. . .....,. •• .
s% .• * , . I •
, ® Al.06 CC) •...
t••••••=
•. ..r..."'''.'.'-
1 i •411.11141 .4. '.
t 1 •fail iiiiiii ill •:. ''•
,.•rt. .., .?
il
11111111nii \.,k letk\ ; ... "." 1
./
/4
. i
4/ • •'/ i4m4 4gr :.
• •
fur••-. ,.. ... f ' •••••i .-
.., ,... . • .. - ,, ... -....
.. .. ...• : -
_ - ...., 11
•e , Lki
--.
,-5.:,-. t•--
7----
®.
-- ii _.__•)-14
•
/ 0•61
"L"....'"'" &Will11311111iiillE ,likle‘a
\.,-. ,..,..r.i....„..., . C)4•
- MEM Iiiin gal 6'47
. I il> •C 1 Mr--
Ner z •'• - • 0 • ..... 1-, 2.•
• -111W"Iiigird=11ani111111iii111. p 4111111\ .....6 woo.. R C .
i 1._:. •••••••-glir-i&: .,•WC INC NNW* ..
.2'...,...i .' "•..,•
— -
. o .
.... ., . i., ...- ---a-•-i--'----.1 - rit. i -.....;:ima, tielM... .„.„ -..-- ... ; :,... . .
..., \..k - ;EIRA .1 . ,. 1 . .., , .., .. ,_•, .....,
:.., -1-* . ' i 1 ., .; ! . vim - ..4'...r. . • ,
4iir ill% 1 •
! . ." : • a;. il is . __, : ._•:..• . ...,... . ... •
40"
. IP ' Min .. .2.Z _,2 2/ • • • - 2 • :7.i lo j••• _ _Y-
. •
..••••VP' L..- .; nit...,. ...7.-'. ; \
l tf
-..4- . - -.: •. • ; 1:. ••". .4- - i \ . g e i I it - ' .-• ...- -4410
. 1
lif. . 4, • ...,
.• 17,4 -•• : ....,. - /0;1. t.. '•• \ -• •• _.....-.- --
- ....-• ... .:
,„„.. Aka.o\ • , ___:-
• ...*"......'" . 1 •. '.' Ill- . ' .\ r i \ ,
,--:::- ; '...-.:alliikaial: . I .., ,. \INS 't • it ill- '...',. . .
.. _.,.•• - 1- '--i I+ ' ' iiii , .
• i ! ,6 ,.., .Nk
•••j•• E 1-r-• t - ••• •-" /„.;dim, ',44 /.4 • • : '. • •\11
\ -----__1•J' ..7.' .
i „ i-.7,4.4. .--7-,--.-41.5., -i -•Fileitr ....:._,.- ,.\ • „I. ..... e .
, _ ___ __ •.......,... L____
•.. , i
, i 1 =Jr-woe'1 .• ::,./. 14 ."It' if', r_.E• . t.'i. t
i.•1 -
. . 1 8 11#111, ..•, 4,„ . • • ,....„,=•
_ r
Mr 41117-- .i: &‘ . . •
•,
........ :
...7 ri... . ••'. 1 .' 4141:40 ...1 )
% .
........ ...... .......-.•
... -
*. , '.',..14---.(;.• • -r-
..,.. ... .../ :. ....
I 7
-'' -\.. •
i & .
•
:'t 4:
- t .
if
t I : \ - • ' - ' •''' -. 1.;
•:.-
:.. I
i ......r..
i iv; ,., • ' '• I .. ... pi
2 le
•
"I'i f i -.•-, __,,
...- _,.......
11---<
4.... 7. • iir...... , . : I :, ' t. .. . . ...... •... . II: 0
A i
. --l'.......:•:''.:"...-11...!..,....--.11.--z-------=•....i.:
1
• •, ';1. ... ...
. ,i•e1411.•t; 1,, „.„. . _ . .3 ., .". _, .... k "i_.........).........„. ,,..;. ...
_ „....„.,,,, •,,.,
,k ,t.,_„., ... .- I.1.. ,... 't ! •. \ 1 • c.'"f. 1: - / . .:0_,_.; .:,....-' ..
/ INA.'.•• : . - • ..:r,
i...'' - - •'si•' \ 3; .i.4... ., . ...... _
/ '• w• •••• ti "......, '1 .•::.i CITY MAP
• ....
• . ?: ,
I T • ..?.:. ..
A RENTON 1
• CsI
a • •'.•.1;.. ‘' .:.---; .
:tie''/-"r e..)1 1.0 ., i.• • •
. KING COUNTY
/[I
il IW P. • • •....:;`‘- - • • . ' ••• • ., ••••-••
I
•i-: •
4 i•.:,.?• .-'6
• ...6%.' ' ' ;
. . / . . -4'. i, . , ''', • • •1 • ti AA •• .
:•SMIs. TIP..SI•TII Hlo.10.•I CL.M.41$51.,••
,•
- -.....ii . i.7. ...... f -,-.;•.•7\ ! --./ L • . ---- ;II r•k I'MI•-I 1*11144014%1 - .
11••••••1•..01,1•,••
? •
• • • -•••Im...i... ••••,!•i,..II •I
' . •1; , •:. •SI ,I 11 N.,6., ....4.‘:•11.6.11i.66
. .
•
1 ,
. . .
•
pr
• Transportation Considerations
For a "worst case" scenario, transit and van-pooling are
assumed to be • nonexistent.
With ride-sharing, a practice gaining substantial support,
subsequent increases in vehicle occupancy suggest a rate
of 1.3 persons per vehicle although this rate will not be
achieved initially when a building is newly occupied. It
can be achieved and maintained with effort on the part of
the occupant.
Existing Traffic
Current traffic demand in terms of Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
and the peak hour demand, expressed in terms of Directional
Design Hourly Volume (DDHV) are shown on Figures 2 and 3.
Note that the evening peak hour is the heaviest peak hour .
Thus, Figure 3 represents the p.m. peak. Traffic data
presented on Figures 2 and 3 was obtained from field studies
conducted during December of 1979 and January of 1980. The
data does not include the influence of new office buildings
presently under construction in the immediate vicinity.
Projected Improvement Programs
The City of Renton adopted a "6-Year Transportation Improvement
Program" on December 3rd, 1979. Within the study area ,
major arterial improvement programs are proposed for :
S.W. 43rd Street from East Valley to West Valley Road.
Valley Parkway from S.W. 43rd to S.W. 16th Street.
Valley Parkway from S.W. 16th to S.W. Grady Way.
Valley Parkway from S.W. Grady Way to S. 140th Street.
On the secondary or minor arterials, the improvement plan
calls for improvements on :
S.W. 27th Street from East Valley Parkway
S.W. 27th Street from Valley Parkway to West Valley Road
S.W. Grady Way Bridge from Longacres Dr. to W.Valley Rd.
. S.W. Grady Way from Lind Avenue S.W. to Longacres Drive
Lind Avenue from S.W. 16th Street to S.W. Grady Way
On the collector arterial system, improvement programs are
scheduled for:
East Valley Road from S.W. 16th Street to SR-167 ramp
S.W. 16th Street from East Valley Road to Monster Road S.W.
Christopher Brown
-3- 9688 rainier m enue s
attic washi ;.•n
7234567 •118
/
" • ;06 00
,
•
s•P9'0j
/7/6O La N~rl
As_ - w..iuw. •• • _
01
.—^• it Golf Course — �`� , !
=— � i. 18 7TM, . ST _ 6625" too IT w
p� 7TM
` /// , Clubhouse 24i l a{2 E 1 I `
�._/ I C« Golf Course ijE I E i
0 ARUNGTON MP °I' f
I INDUSTRIAL '1 7}' Su
`• / ^ AREA /• �'
11` I i Sr ''A.f� TOM YIIIAGE
�. f•TM '1_i �I RIB/ NC CENTER
Ammon kfrf+• �.��• =r SOUTN RENT QD w[w/a1
Treatment(Sint w'� sl INTERCNAII f�
OIL
NRIVER �Wj� /, f� t eV „SM ��
1=
1'. -. fT
Soo yoi liT� <
�6 � ��If /760 I 61 2900 3200 �_ r .
i A --03
A I W 0
w
■
®� s LONGACRES rn M NI w g
3[i[~T ST OrS!R•CIIIIX-11—
VOQ J, 2 II5 , TrickL — — �— — — v 71 F
I e I • 19 •+ _ �i
8. I �, ` ;
_ti— I I • 25 30 (IlirfKbf �TAL
>E iu
F, 1 �•iilf *CM
QR•.ervar
• is
O�Y 1 d«I Powir I Sub Sulan ` p At
4iik\N 1I—
M
,�
C I .nebf i �=+ 1
E 1 RENTON CITY LIMITS ��
�• I TUKWILA CITY LIMITS 1
a
4F ' I
II o
°� T I I ( - .
•
i L
1 TLJKWILA II i L
tv I
. I; • II w
I<
fi 1 C f J O
ifM
i #A if , f
w LDS ar [
14T
n i i
Sv� 1 , t1_i`.), Lin
R I 2 VALL[Y ,+T 1
• •
NOO� ITAI `1i
l•
�1 oRIWA D. * kr/ 10
.
sr
ACM
1 ORILIJA '1 •• IMTERCNANGE
/COCO ! OD • „„ le,.oHo T, /02z0 . t1n 2'�
1ft +T RENTON CITY IMIT,� • _ .Z7D7v •s ►�_
. ::I- KENT CITY LIMITS
/IIAG ' eb 2257r • •
L
-4- p FIC URGE 2 8 ,CS
;
•i'I •
•
Golf Course 7 `A S'
set28 7TN41 r [t •, ♦ nN
i
ll
a 24 193
auenous/ I
P. coat coupe i ! E
r `� i
o EARLINGiON ,„
N / INDUSiRIAI L e !r
? AREA �f •
t r^
dl , �.. IOTN e r // 4 1118,60 TON
VILLAGE
CENT It
f Renton anal •r•$Z3 2 l SOUTN VENT M eNT It
Trwtmem Punt r'��/ a St INTERCHAN O
t ew 1 Z
SEEN RIVER \N. S0� T•F�+1108 �'i s., ` 0,. sT` Wit O)� t
rERCNANG( �. 9� ' giBDC)
_ et sI.TN
.C1
�O' \� ION LT ' 0 e flan
4/ 60 4` s
1 ,fefre- S= �I W a 1
SrAt -
0
7 9 LOGACR(S 1 Z Z R
i
is
I - t e`. n I I N N 1-
`• m H IH i Zoo
[ IMT 'IT I,
ase Rum !Track t
. 11 11 • s ui
� • �IF - I : 25 30 Wince/as .;:i
t I '- I r [LI
�. I Gate ©Rei....r Y RCM.
e • • E. •
-
1�Power Sub Sutwn �` S 7 .-
; 1
wr
C I Wncad ra > �i 1
a lr I RENTON CITY LIMITS
—1 �_ TUKWILA CCITY LIMITS E •4
nSF
er 11 / 2
+
`i s w
0 VV I —
0
n1Kwiu 1 t t
o
e\'''''''4%.%\ t'' 'I . I�
4.
- o
/ w a ( r }
y re
/ = r yyy�,,, . a Kin O
Q et
0 '\f`r Q �Li'�W [
n iIt
> 25 30 ^ ® �i
_ 36 31 2®
sl A Q tin
. .. `IN tO 4 JA 1 O[ML11AL 1T1
• t 1 4 oRILL1A * id
.763 INTERCHANGE /� /D
' A UOTN[T) r, �—. 14 '�'n 6J
[w U ° 6 RENTON CITY IMIT,S r'i� a Cl /�
_ ltlit 0 • KENT CITY LIMITS4
(VAC) , '� _ M[OICAL
Igt 4.
_ 7B0 :tej �$07Q L DENTAL
F/G U I?E 3
/57 9 D. H. 1/ / M Tok Hour)
i
Q
1 ° 0
IboZ v
11'/' 112;) 419
J 8) kI GR4VY is'ip
8 '12 le OP T ///c
_,,1
11� 1 •
i 5�' .
p Note: The data on this sheet show
0 R" - peak hour turning movements
and principal "approach" volumes.
The data represents peak conditions
1 in the interval prior to the
opening of the new Austin Building
on Lind @ 16th. .
•
42.
L, J
Itio ^�
b
v ��6
(c—_r f46
ie
P \k°
1.
i 31,0
0 �3 go 6
31 .53 51 /
114a l
'
i s gym/ St rw 6
/14
Iti9 0T 1- B �0 ,�T' 353
r
y
3 . vs 1 85 .
FIGURE 3 A
Chriatophcr Brows4an po
_6 P.M. PEAK HOUR (19 7 9) 9688 rainier evrenue
_ 2 `'hin;,!1ls
Adjacent jurisdictions have scheduled various improvement
programs that will have some positive if not measurable
effect. On the state highway system these include:
Relocation and reconstruction of SR-515 (1980)
Resurface SR-181, SR-516 .to I-405 (1982)
Construct 1/2-diamond interchange; 212th St. at SR-167 (1983)
Ramp improvements; 84th Avenue at SR-167 (1981)
In the City of Kent, improvement programs, generally street
widening and arterial construction are proposed for the East
Valley Road, 80th Avenue S. , N. 4th Avenue, and N. Central.
King County has no improvements scheduled on the current
6-Year Transportation Improvement Plan for the general area.
Generally, capacity to the south via existing corridors
including SR-181, SR-167 , and the arterial facilities between
these two routes will be improved. To the north, the signi-
ficant barrier will be Interstate 405 and Grady Way. These
facilities have been addressed in the City of Renton's
Improvement Plan. Design studies are currently underway
including the Valley Parkway to Grady Way and the Grady Way
structure over the C.M. St.P. & P.R.R. The Lind Avenue
structure is given a very low priority.
Trip Distribution and Peak Hour Demand
Trip distribution has been estimated on the basis of previous
employee residence surveys (C. Brown, P.E. Parkway Plaza Office
Building Traffic Study, Jack Benaroya Company. 1979.
C. Brown, P.E. Boeing Everett Facility Expansion DEIS and FEIS
City of Everett. 1979) . Adjustments have also been made
to reflect potential housing starts south of the project site ,
in Auburn, Federal Way, and the northern portions of Pierce
County. This is described in Table I, Employee Residence
Distribution.
With respect to potential peak hour demands, data from a
large scale employment center has been utilized. Major
employment centers, recognizing the peak hour impacts in
terms of congestion, utilize "staggered" shifts. For example, "
Table II which was derived from traffic demands at the Boeing-
Everett facility, shows several peaks during the inbound and
outbound time intervals. For example, 7:15 a.m. accounts for
the largest inbound demand. The next largest takes place at
8:15. For planning purposes, the data of Table II serves as
an appropriate estimate. Essentially, major employment
centers served by congested streets are "extended" .peak hours.
The greater the demand, the longer the peak hour.
christopher brown pe
-7- 9688 rainier anue a
.. rule washin;tc 8
TABLE I
RENTON AREA - OFFICE FACILITIES
•
EMPLOYEE RESIDENCE DISTRIBUTION
Percent of Total
Location Percent
Southwest Snohomish County (Edmonds, Montlake Terrace,
! Lynnwood) 3.0
' Other Snohomish County 3.0
Bothell 1. 0
Woodinville 1. 0
King County, North Redmond ' 1.0
Redmond, City 1.0
' North Bellevue 3.0
Mid-Bellevue 5.0
" Medina, Clyde Hill 2. 0
Mercer Island 2.0
Kirkland 2.0
Issaquah, North Bend and Vicinity 1. 0
Seattle, North of Canal, East of I-5 6.0
Seattle, North of Canal, West of I-5 6.0
Seattle, South of Canal, East of I-5 9.0
Seattle, South of Canal, West of I-5 6.0
Renton, CBD and East Suburbs 6. 0
Renton, South of CBD 8. 0
Kent 4.0
' Kent, East Hill 5.0
Auburn 4.0
Federal Way 3.0
Des Moines and Normandy Park 5. 0
Burien 5.0
King County, East of SR-167 4. 0
Tacoma and Pierce County (Fife, Puyallup Vicinity) 4. 0
The data of this table will be applicable for future years.
Housing availability will, in all likelihood, become more
oriented to the south.
-8-
• .
. .
(Li 00
C5-0 co
....D•
. *1 n S •.
• :
• • , / a . .• ..• ....V;•••;•• ' i:Ca .......
- . . ..., • •
•
. -
. .. .; ;;.;•: A t 1‘...w.
..• . .::'....!•/.:. •....11
. • • ..
.--% c•-• 0 E4)
: • - 0 arra•4 .
EQ 04 .' 12._
- r....„
-. ii. tP si ... :, ,-,21illiii!— -8 ; f • -.Jr• glj 1
E *
. ,... .
, .1:7:7-:.*:*•-ay. Aillilliellielti
i" 1 " •
.• i • ..? . ... . , ....
.1.0•WeviiiL ',Ill.', w-.Aliiiii- -- d
11111...ikm..., ,t,b.,.\\. .-ii .......t. ., _ : •
• . -- ••• .....
,as
.. a 11111301113i1111111:115 A,•,v,..,;k•-::-... . ,_
2 ' .
/
• . -.-
......,,,
owe ..,....44. R st .- • -• •
,..iiir.• illinsioicilliesainingi&. •ba
-'ie.i .t ''...''' . • --
_8.31.1•Gasni:. „„(
., —— ..... • !iii • x:•-::.
.• ' -'411' t. ...... 11 Ind saviro,..... \ •: , \ • ,•: ow....„ i.. 0 . ...
,. . • /
,.. \ MR I lithig2 •••,.,.... I ....... .. '.,• *.I)
et`a......'....... s• 2., i:J
i , NM- se , -,Nr„... ... ..., . „. . ....... .....1
a'..: . ::. - . e. '. M. :. • . ,•
• ••• •••••
,... ,,: „.,--- ,....., y-i.,.. .. ......„... ir
...f. '
• • ' •-• ..^..... 2 A 442 I .--
....._
r • c..•I; . • ...
i
_, . .•.-..• . -. _______ .
_.. .
, • ,... , . , . .:......- ,..i, A P --441 - • i -- „____-_-.401"ii.. _
1 . .0 ••-.... . sm. .
........ • k* : \ v,
l.. wo..4111. ____ _ •
•• • Vi" . .** **... ' T ...r. ;1;46 •.4 . tt'i''
:1•.. . ar .....*. •
L.,
•-.
. t .tAgargimpi :. : • . • ja" ...,.... 1. . 1 • Cr .1. I'. '
i
.. •-•
"•
. i:m:...:-/,...• --...;,. ... -i '• 41111/4r ----"::- • -1 .;- .r'a l'-^ . 4
i • ......,....."li ./' . :;;•. f..-1. lilt in aj i .
e:•• - 1 k, j iiiitar • ;. • .-....: :1i- i • 'T .. ii • ..: •
'..
.... f , • , : ----.• _._....._....._......... . ..
-
,......... i ;. 'Milli. \ i r
i " Se' , • , / •
• ilf 1.. , ,
.• ----.. I.-• ; -
Jo, Ifitgo , . . •1
' ---—..——- .
..gr ,,,._.... I
r t
. . ,., ...• •
....
. , •
ai
. •i -.• •: / \ :-
; I . . 7, T ..V: .' .• \ I
: i I"; : 1 . i• -
! ‘. . . 1 ili ,--. 1 ---1---.•
•• .
- 4.•4:' 1 &\ ''..• I I- -•:'.' 6 1 i .
3 i' " I - ' -•\.-
, .• —
' .ii*./ \ .. li !••..* s '''''".--' -•-•--
• •........ 3 I; .......,
'
:\ i
•• ) fai I '- .-1,1•.''* .... 1 az,":•""•••"!...t-- I ,_
; .....:••=1,--+,,-.....?: ...z9...t.;,......-5,tn:a--,ar- iii,•• . r
0
..?.• .i . •.:':..... 1 ••• .;. 7 7 ": ' " -.7...ti...,..4.luo•-..•: ,..
11,,k. .••••• '.!.....C....c it WAY al y 1 .. u• a
.....:••-•'1.3., r. /„ - .
% ..• . ,,... i'-''•-:--•• •• •. ._ .,
% 1 j!... Illik.
,/, ..N.% i.I am."
. '... 4*, •i .. .... . /
1., •• • i V.' • 9'
a. " tf. r:/- x• ,
.ks---_,..:. ''.;.:. __,;• .....* -- ----. !t *c
'*"...':**:•.7;•••r
...... •:•:.. Iiii 1 \:- r • .1' •, f.x ‘. -:%\f" •:.•____.i.
10 •-•,..:::.. ! • •:....,- r...- s •••::::- r. -k,jr•
• .,,, 5 .? . CITY MAP. • .
•
••••1 ' . ..„,
.• .-,,. •...,
II.; Air i -....,);• ' ..-- "' .. . ..
• 0 RENTON
, • .... ,----. .. .,:`,... - .......
,. , KING COL NTY
ig V. :: ..... k • ' • . ,
,. . • -•I . . •))
tt . r•%....-.., -, 1 - •
- -- -- - - • .- .— , A i • tt.
a • _ ! -.--;,,,A..••-•------ - -,;_ ____ • ••
•"-. • ; ..-. !t . .. .,-,,. • I
• •, , . --.., i . • -
_,,, -•. 4••• --i7: ----- --)- - —---- ----- ,...,sHi....07....-CT ATI 1111..tOkAli:4.0.11154M
L • . Dkpairia41•4 I t I.hilssligian
.. .. .‘ i• ..• • • pi 4.S.0.....;,:si$1..... I.
.
. • • •• I • :1.••10.41•41..f 74,......p.ps•Ts...., i
•
•
.....• i. Il:141: ssI,IIIMAN ati..11%:S1T•II(... • .. .
• • •
'
. •
TABLE II
• HOURLY VARIATION
INBOUND
Percent of Average Daily Demand
Time Percent
1 m n. Hour
6:15 0.30
6:30
1.97
6:45 5.19
7:00 8.20 15.66
7:15 22.96
7: 30 6.49
7 :45 1.61
8:00 1.34 32 .40
8:15 14 .12
8:30 1.67
8 :45 - 0.57
9:00 0.88 17 .24
OUTBOUND
3:15 1.58
3:30 1.21
3:45 16 .01
4:00 3.02 21.82
4 :15 7.49
4:30 3.35
4:45 20.99
5:00 6.10 37 .92
5:15 1.77
5:30 - 1.77
5:45 1.68
6:00 0.56 5.77
Source: Everett Facility Expansion EIS
The above table represents the inbound and outbound demand
on the parking facilities.
Expected variation on the arterial street system expressed
in terms of inbound (across the screen line towards the office
Park) and outbound (away from the office Park) is described
in Table III. Note that this table extends for the 24-hour
time interval.
•
-10-
TABLE III
HOURLY VARIATION AS A PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND
Time Inbound Outbound
12-1 0.7 3.3
1-2 0.2 0.7
2-3 0.3 0.4
3-4 0.1 0.3
4-5 0.6 0.3
5-6 2.4 0.5
6-7 16.9 2.9
7-8 21.4 5.0
8-9 6.0 3.6
9-10 3.3 3.7
10-11 3.5 4.7
11-noon 4.3 6.1
12-1 4.6 5.6
1-2 4.5 5.5
2-3 7.4 5.7
3-4 6.5 13.7
4-5 5.6 17 .0
5-6 3.0 8.0
6-7 2.0 3.4
7-8 1.9 2.6
8-9 1.5 2.0
9-10 0.7 1.6
10-11 0.8 1.3
11-12 1.8 2.2
Source: Estimate from support facility relocation,
Boeing Scientific Research Center , South Park
Area Traffic Study (C. Brown, P.E. October 1978)
The influence of both the inbound and outbound morning peak
hour on arterial facilities is evident in the above. From
about 6:30 a.m. until 8:00, the average demand is in the
order of 19.2 percent of total daily demand. In the after-
,
noon, extending from about 3:15 until 5:30 is in the order
of 15.3 percent. Some latitude exists in that the inbound
interval from 8:00 to 9 :00 a.m. is relatively light. Also,
after 5:30 p.m. demand is light but, even today, is increasing.
Note that the afternoon peak hour also tends to include
social-recreation trips in addition to those originating
from a place of employment. Finally, Table III also indi-
cates the lack of other types of activity in the area (such
as shopping) in that there is very little demand on the
system apart from the peak hours. The balance of demand
tends to be thru trips or those trips associated with the
delivery and pick-up of material.
-1;1-
Vehicular Demand - Peak Hour •
Table II indicated the hourly demand at the project site.
The a.m. peak hour will have a maximum demand of about 32. 40%
of total daily inbound demand. Conversely, in the evening peak
the outbound demand w 11 amount to 37.9'2% for the hour.
Assuming a maximum employment of 8,000 persons, the maximum
moning demand will provide for the accommodation of 2,592
persons. With an assumed vehicle occupancy of 1.3 persons
per vehicle, the maximum morning demand will be 1,994 vehicles
per hour. Note that this does not assume any viable transit
operation which would serve as a mitigating measure.
In the evening, the maximum hour will provide for 3,034
person trips. Again, using a vehicle occupancy of 1. 3 persons
per vehicle a maximum demand of 2 , 334 vehicles per hour is
anticipated.
Figure 5 is the representation 'of p.m. peak hour vehicular
movements. This figure, based on the trip distribution
described in Figure 4 , assumes the continued congestion of
I 405 at SR 167. Accordingly, about 22 percent of the demand
will be oriented to I 405 via Grady Way and/or S.W. 7th Street
through the Central Business District to either the Maple
Valley Highway Interchange of I 405 or other access roads.
Note that improvements to I 405 would shift the 22 percent
from surface streets to the SR 167 - I 405 interchange.
Essentially, current congestion will lead to diversion to
other surface streets.
Adjacent Developments
Adjacent commercial developments along Grady Way will impact
Grady Way, particularly at the intersection of Lind Avenue.
For example, the O/W Office Building, situated just west of
Raymond Avenue at Grady Way, has 97,000 g.s. f. leasable space.
This office building is expected to contribute 3240 vehicular
trips per day, all of them onto Grady Way. The morning peak
hour will include about 296 vehicles and the afternoon peak
hour about 264 vehicles per hour. Because of the impacts of
this development, the owners are in the process of developing
plans for the "3-Laning" of S.W. Grady Way in the immediate
vicinity of the project site, extending across the property
towards Raymond Avenue. This is considered to be an interim
measure, is being financed entirely by the owners, and is only
an interim measure pending the 5-laning -of Grady Way through
an LID. The LID is expected to be commenced by .the end of 1980.
Additional developments currently under consideration include
two major proposals in the vicinity of the Earlington Golf
Christopher brown
-12- F 9688 fifer avenue s.
at washin;ton
•
•• •
•` •.I i : i:;�FA . •1 ' .. J - i.' . ...-... I
-I; . : ' ,' '_I,• ' ,. 1,
•
Iiiiiiiiti
. 1, -•. r.
_ .. • \ I; A
- • l•-• • 1 ED
)',. " ; ...:. •••• , liVIIIIII„, , .
• ••.,. NAIR OM, .4b / ,..i-7 .
. • _...... .. ,, .
• . ,.......
. , 4 ,,... . ..
sw.• • , ....._..____,.
i IIINIIIIIP-----'..7.---.
�. ;• �`..1•�'- ' �., r /...,4„
„ `ate' .. .-111.111 •`•
1 - . ,i \ " \\111111 ;jig 4;!
.% . . ...1 .ffillir, .1; ...........
l003 /
' + r , I ,:_C.'
4. IL •i , �• n, ,‘. IVRIMA. 'V% ' 0 i f .-
37 O j f S REMT01�
::,..:.....:::
t„to� 'I•
_ 7 ......•a -• ED . '4=r3".
•
\ ' • . 1 •••• ,;:i:i:a....w
8� , . .
f . 711•nl• . 1 I : F . -... 1
:i 1 ' 1 f • !
t ; I
i I •I anal •I ' I �� ~-• , I f , i `
• 1 0 • (..... ..)\ 0.01
__ 187 •
• —
I FIGURg s
p ki Peok MU/r- l7e/r7 qn4 .
.fife 6'c-/7cm71cc/ 7, gc. 0/74,,)
—13— � christo�er Brown
�— 9688 rainier avenue• wattle washin•ton
• tel:7234567 -•:118
iti
, 4�
' Q
V
111
3
11- 21()
alb
1 �
/ZB9 ' 3--R9 GR4D5- /I✓'4,-
_T T79 V ipt M in
��B
l'tac,
31 A51-
Note: No capacity restraints have
been imposed on the system.
[-3--4‘,o r Grady Way @ Lind Avenue will not
operate with volumes .sh9wn.
A.
b
SIP 0q�
t * I 1:\
N 1:dio'l il \VL/46
1.!4157;;c fin0
Horizon Year", is term used ID ,p 0
to indicate time when all 1� 6il \
properties are built-up. t
1 1,1 J J
1449'1
d / q
/l c2
�' yyM' sY .rw J�6 Z1�'
1 7 r 's
8�� '� 30
3 a' 232 $S 11
FIGURE 6 chriatopher Brawn pc
-14- HORIZON YEAR D.D.H.V. 9688 rainier avenue a
the washin;ton
Lel:7234567 •:118
a•I
Course. These projects include, as mitigating measures, the
extension of Powell Avenue to Grady Way. Consequently, Grady
Way may become impacted from more than one direction.
Horizon Year DDHV
The p.m. peak hour, as the heaviest peak hour of the day, is
the principal concern with respect to developments in the
South Renton area.
P. M. peak hour distributions are portrayed on Figure 6. This
data has not been adjusted to incorporate either capacity
restraints or the influence of transit or other mitigating
measures. Similarly, this figure does not incorporate possible
demands from other developments that may take place although
the, data does include expected demands from the O/W facility.
Capacity
On the basis of Overall Intersection Capacity (Figure 20,
Public Roads Vol. 34, No. 10, October, 1967) adequate inter-
section capacity exists at the East Valley Road and 41st
Street S.W. and at the East Valley Road at 43rd Street S.W.
The tacit assumption in both cases is that the approach
lanes are 36 feet in width in order to accommodate the heavy
right-turn demands as shown on Figure 6. Adequate capacity
also exists at the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and 43rd
Street S.W. Again, little development outside of that under
construction is assumed and no mitigating measures are included.
The principal concern is the intersection of Lind Avenue at
Grady Way. With a heavy northbound demand on the south leg
of the intersection (1910 vph) in concert with heavy demands
on Grady Way, the intersection is not capable of operating
at an adequate Level of Service. Indeed, even excluding the
' intersection, the northbound volume of 1910 vph exceeds the
capacity of the two-lane structure, estimated at 1470 vph.
Given the proposed widening of the Lind Avenue structure over
I-405 , its capacity can increase to 3460 vph. It must be
recongized that widening the stucture will not change, the
capacity of the intersection of Grady Way arr Lind Avenue. •
This intersection is the key.
A brief analysis was conducted at the intersection of Lind
Avenue and Grady Way with the demands noted on Figure 6. To
accommodate the northbound peak movements, the south leg of
Lind Avenue will require, at a minimum, two right-turning
lanes, a single thru lane, and two left-turning lanes, for a
total approach width of 60 feet. This is not feasible nor
desirable.
- I
Christopher Brown pe
-15- 9688 rainier aNenue a
p,,gthe washin; .n
234567 6.118
• V+ ' _
• A second test was performed which assumes an additional
overcrossing at Raymond Avenue S.W. between S.W. 16th Street
and Grady Way. The second overcrossing essentially allows
additional left-turning and right-turning capacity in the
northbound direction or, stated another way, shares the
turning movements. Redefined peak hour demands are described
in Figure 7.
In terms of capacity, it may be noted that adequate Levels
of Service will prevail at the intersection of Raymond and
Grady Way given a two-lane approach. The two-lane approach
would consist of a Right Turn Only lane and a Left Turn Only
lane. Each lane is assumed to be 12 feet in width so that
capacity at Level of Service "D" would be in the order of
500 vph per lane against probable demands of 308 and 327 vph
for left-and right-turn movements respectively.
Constructing a second bridge across I-405 at Raymond Avenue
would have the effect of reducing traffic demand on Lind to
the extent that the projected widening of this stucture may
not be necessary other than as a means of storing vehicles
on the approaches at signalized intersections. However, the
necessity for widening the structure should be subject to
additional detailed analysis.
With the implementation of a second overcrossing at I-405
with assumed traffic movements as shown on Figure 7, the
intersection of Grady Way and Lind Avenue will still be
over capacity assuming a 3-lane approach road configuration.
Again, this must be considered a preliminary estimate.
Changes in signal timing and phase configuration could
improve the short-fall in capacity.
Conclusions
The projected developments in the vicinity of Lind Avenue S.W.
and 16th Street which would provide employment for about
8,000 persons appear to be feasible in terms of their trans-
portation requirements with respect to corridor facilities
oriented to the south, subject to implementation of road
improvement programs by adjacent jurisdictions. However,
adequate access opportunity does not exist to the north.
This is principally due to capacity restraints. The capacity
restraints include two distinct features; overcrossing
capacity (I-405 structure) and signalization at Grady Way.
Increasing the width of the Lind Avenue overcrossing of
I-405 will increase bottleneck capacity to the detriment of
traffic operations at the intersections of Lind Avenue and
Grady Way. Alternate capacity can be achieved by an additional -
crossing structure utilizing Raymond Avenue S.W.• This will
christ:opher brown pc
_16- 9688 miner nler avenue a
attle washin;ton
t el:7234561 ••118
' w
4
rs
b
P, 43ti b
�
Way 98/�261 Grady \2 3, #
/io8 .08 ti1 i/gr ,(.^\ rre /7�8
/\
*7* t'5'
\_
/r'/h or m#'tn7I,77 prnytr 23v71a;
XX m d-'rrrtn 4 kw,v'r-- sr, pia
a
Figure describes the horizon year DDHV with Raymond Avenue
extended across 1-405 to Grady Way.
FIGURE 7 -
christopher Brown pe
Redefined D.D.H.V. 9688 rainier avenue s.
-17-
: atde washi nAton
tel:7234567vol18
shift traffic demand to the west, provide adequate capacity
over I-405, and improve traffic operations on Grady Way by
distributing the substantial left-and right-turn movements.
This traffic report does not address the key intersections
of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue or Grady Way at the West
Valley Road. Similarly, this report must be considered
preliminary in nature, subject to revision, as other de-
velopments are identified and their precise scope defined.
Recommendations
Appropriate recommendations for consideration are:
1. Include linkage of Raymond Avenue between
S.W. 16th Street and Grady Way on the City
of Renton Arterial Street Plan with potential
designation of "collector arterial".
2. Modify City of Renton "6-Year Transportation
Improvement Program" .
3. Conduct detailed studies for extension of
Raymond Avenue across Interstate 405 with
possible extension to S.W. 10th Street.
4. Study priority array involving the potential
extension of the Valley Parkway between S.W.
16th Street and SR-900 with the Raymond Avenue
extension acting as an interim opportunity.
5: Accelerate Grady Way improvement program
between Lind Avenue S.W. and West Valley Road.
6. Investigate potential transit routing through
area via Raymond/Lind couplet.
7. Investigate distributive network potential
between Grady Way and Sunset Boulevard via
Stevens Avenue S.W. or thru the Earlington '
Woods development.
8. Review access opportunities in the southern
corridor when City of Kent plan is completed.
9. Review SR-167/43rd Street S.W. interchange
configuration for potential capacity improve-
ment programs.
•
-18- Chrisher Brown pe
%88 rainier avenue a
se72 56washin"6:18
___)tel:
FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
Application No(s ) : SP-427-79
Environmental Checklist No : ECF-511-79
Description of Proposal : Fill and grade of
approximately 250,000
cubic yards on *30.8
acres
Proponent : AUSTIN COMPANY
Location of Proposal : South side of S .W.
19th Street west
of Raymond Avenue
S .W.
Lead Agency : PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on June 18, 1980 following
a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department .
Oral comments were accepted from:
The Engineering, Traffic Engineering, Building and Police
Departments all expressed concern that the proposal had major
impacts on water and water courses , plant and animal life
and topographic changes which needed a detailed analysis.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-511-79 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by:
Gene Williams , Assistant Planner , dated May 27 , 1980
2 ) Applications : SP-427-79
3 ) Recommendations for a declaration of significance :
Moved by Gordon Y . Ericksen , seconded by John E . Webley
that a declaration of significance be issued; all concurred .
Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined
this development does have significant adverse impact on
the environment . An EIS is required under RCW 43 .21C.030( 2) (c) .
This decision was made after review by the lead agency of
a complete environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance :
( 1 ) Non-consideration of the project impacts on the 100-year
flood plain and the regional storm drainage basin .
(EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER WATERSHED PROJECT )
( 2 ) Filling of the area proposed would eliminate existing
wildlife habitat .
( 3) The scope of the development plans submitted are inadequate
to determine impacts on municipal services .
Signatures :
t
lannin
t3 hn E . Webley , arlCs Director Go don Y, E itksen, Pg
`-� 'Director
Warren C . Gonnason , Director `
Public Works Department
DATE OF PUBLICATION : June 25 , 1980
EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD : July 9, 1980
i -
{
.„,
BEGINNING
OF FILE .
FILE TITLE EC �, PERM IT SP - �7� 79'
10 FILL AND QRA DE -
sw 19T1+ sr. 13En/. RAYMONQ AVE. 4-- LUNGACRE.S
AUSTIN COMPANY
et
eo- (ct,
THE AlT - 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST.
... RENTON, WA 98055
Y "147 PHONE: 206/226-8800
TELEX: 910.423.0882
DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223.01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3
March 26, 1981
_
Mr . Roger J. Blaylock
Associate Planner
The City of Renton •
- .
200 Mill Avenue South •
Renton , Washington 98055 i
Subject : ERC Review/Valley Office Park II
SA-092-80/ECF-602-80
Dear Mr . Blaylock :
We are in receipt of your letter dated March 16, 1981,
indicating that the Environmental Review Committee wishes
additional comments from us on certain mitigating measures
relating to the site development plan for the above mentioned
project . .
Upon reviewing our previous correspondence , we find that we
have addressed the majority of the issues (see letter attached
dated February 6, 1981, Exhibit A) ; however , we take this
opportunity to expand on our statements .
1. Construction of a pedestrian walkway on Lind Avenue
Southwest between Southwest Grady Way and Southwest 16th
Street .
Lind Avenue , for the most part , has very narrow and steeply
sloped shoulders which would present a problem in design
and construction. This condition would , no doubt , warrant
a post and cantilever type design. The bridge over
Interstate 405 has three (3) foot wide sidewalks on either
side which can' t be widened without reducing the roadway.
Considering the small amount of pedestrian traffic which we
have observed , we feel that this improvement could be
delayed; however , should the City of Renton feel
differently, we would agree to participate in the cost of
the sidewalk installation according to our pro-rata share
of property owned in the Valley which would benefit from
such an improvement.
2. Providing a traffic signal at the intersection of Lind
Avenue Southwest and Southwest 16th Street .
Mr . Roger J. Blaylock
March 26, 1981
•
Page Two
The signalization will apparently become necessary at some
future date as the south Renton area develops ;_ however--, _at _ -
the present time , according to traffic studies- as prepared
by Christopher Brown P. E. and Entranco Engineers , Inc . , the
actual traffic flow from the valley, plus a projected
traffic flow from the proposed office complex , would not
warrant a traffic signal . Again , however , we would support
the cost of installing a signal , should it be deemed
necessary. We would also assume that the cost would be
divided on a pro-rata basis .
3. Widening of the southern leg of the intersection at
Southwest Grady Way and Lind Avenue Southwest to include
left and right hand turn lanes .
The Austin Company recognizes that the intersection of
Southwest Grady Way and Lind Avenue Southwest is one of the
ails facing the community. We would agree to participate
in widening Lind Avenue Southwest to incorporate the
turning lanes on the south side although, according to the
traffic studies mentioned above , it is felt that unless
Grady Way and the intersection of Rainier and Grady Way are
improved ,. the work at Lind Avenue would be a needless
expense . In any event , the work south of Grady Way on Lind
Avenue would benefit everyone in the valley, including
Longacres , while work on Grady Way and/or Rainier would
benefit the entire city.
4. Location (approximate) of storm water drainage channel from
property limit at East Valley Road to intersection of Lind
Avenue Southwest and proposed Southwest 19th Street.
We are enclosing a sketch of the channel which we propose
for your consideration - see Exhibit B.
We thank the Committee for this additional opportunity of
addressing the mitigating measures .
Should you have questions regarding our response , please feel
free to contact me .
Very truly yours ,
/eid. ,.5Ve--)77-4.41qL
R. D. Hemstreet
Assistant District Manager
•
- RDH-:d t — - —
EXHIBIT A
THEAUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 1ETH STREET
fr/ RENTON• WASHINGTON 98055
COMPANY -�___ � � TELEPHONE:-208/228.9800-
TELEX: 910.423.0882
DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS
February 6, 1981 .r% R
Mr . David R. Clemens
(( �• 19�1
Acting Planning Director
ti
City of Renton ° _ _- _
Planning Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Subject: Proposed Austin Company Development
Application SA-092-80
Environmental Checklist ECF-602-80
Dear Mr . Clemens:
We are in receipt of the publication generated by the
Environmental Review Committee in reference to our proposed
development of Lot No . 1 of the property currently owned by
Valley Office and Industrial Park, Inc . The property is
located between Lind Avenue Southwest and East Valley Road , and
bounded on the north by Southwest 16th Street and on the south
by Southwest 19th Street.
We take this opportunity of thanking the committee for its
position of openmindedness in offering us the opportunity to
respond to certain measures which were deemed significant to
the environment.
Since the concerns were listed in numerical order, we will
respond to each according to the numbering system identified in
the publication.
1. From the traffic study generated by Christopher Brown , P. E.
(copy enclosed) , we understand that the traffic does not
• meet the warrant critieria for a traffic signal at the
intersection of Southwest 16th Street and Lind Avenue
- Southwest at this time, even considering a new four (4)
- building complex . However, should the traffic signal be
deemed necessary, now or in the future, due to the further
development of the valley, we would certainly endorse the
improvement through paying our fair share of the costs. We
assume these costs would be based upon a pro-rata of land
owned in the valley.
•
lei;` 11 j•;itJ' /•,•
Mr . David R. Clements 1 �'
,
February 6, 1981 -e - �'
j Page Two
//iv'!VG D'- -:
2. We concur that the intersection of Grady Way and Lind
Avenue -Southwest could be considered "a bottleneck; however,-
the overriding consideration is the traffic flow on Grady
Way -itself and the east and west intersections on either
side of Lind Avenue Southwest. We foresee that the
congestion at Grady Way and Lind Avenue Southwest could be
alleviated to some degree by provision of turning lanes
from Lind Avenue onto Grady Way. As the valley develops ,
this entire matter will become worse . We , therefore, would
agree to participate in improvement as stated under a
formula as established in item No . 1, above.
3. There is genuine concern, from many points of view,
regarding the pedestrian traffic now flowing on Lind Avenue
from Southwest Grady Way to Southwest 16th Street. Many of
our employees, as well as those of other employers, utilize
public transportation. During the winter months, the
arrival and departure times are in hours of darkness. For
the protection of pedestrians , clear , distinguishable
walkways should be established . We are in accord to pay
our share according to a pro-rata distribution system as
mentioned in No . 1, above.
I .
4. We understand the eventual need of improving the bridge
over I-405; however , we understand that improvements to the
bridge, without extensive work elsewhere to alleviate
traffic would , no doubt, be fruitless. Again, should this
development proceed based on the ultimate needs of the
Renton Valley, we would participate to the extent that
would be reasonably expected of any land owner in the
valley.
5. We understand that any development on this site must
accommodate the storm drainage from other sites until
L. I.D. 314 becomes a reality. Therefore, we will address
- the problem as an integrated part of our development
program. it is understood that when L. I.D. 314 is
implemented, or other measures are taken, the importance of
this matter will materially diminish or vanish altogether.
6. As a part of the initial development, a sidewalk along the
east side of Lind Avenue Southwest from Southwest 16th
Street to a point approximately 600 feet south, will be
provided.
I '
Mr. David R. Clements
February 6, 1981 �� a
Page Three L"
1 -
7. We plan to provide shower and dressing facilities at the
extremities of at least one building for the benefit of
joggers. In addition, a courtyard sidewalk system will be
available for passive recreation, together with benches for
those who wish to contemplate nature. We feel that the
existing walkways on Lind Avenue , west side, are sufficient .
for the present and future joggers.
We hope that the mitigating measures, as addressed above, will
allow the Environmental Review Committee to issue a declaration
of non-significance. Should the committee require additional
supportive information concerning any of the mitigating
measures, we would be most pleased to discuss them.
Very truly yours ,
-;i;;;LX:1/615; 4_
Paul S. Chiado
Vice President and
District Manager
I '
PSC:dt
1
. . . ;
fr-I
110 O SOUTHWEST 16TH ST.
THE E AUSTIN RENTON. WA 98055
COMPANY PHONE:
6/226-8800
TELEX: 9010.423.0882
DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS wJ 223.0,1 AU-ST.-IC-T377N3
tsp
■Yh
i)
October 21 , 1980 `-
.
Mr . G. Y. Ericksen � `:
Planning Director `.
The City of Renton
Municipal Building °
200 Mill Avenue South --
Renton , Washington 98055
Subject : Valley Office Park - Complex II
Renton , Washington
Dear Mr . Ericksen :
We are pleased to respond to your letter of September 12 , 1980 ,
concerning reservations that the Environmental Review Committee
had relevant to our proposed complex .
As you suggested , we engaged a traffic engineer to study the
' impact of on-site generated traffic and traffic generated from
the general surrounding area . The analysis indicates volumes
of traffic which could reasonably be expected for the following
cases :
Case I: Existing traffic and full development of the 395
acres as warehousing and light industry (M-P
zoning) .
Case II : Existing traffic and Parcel A office (12 .5 acres)
+ 382 .4 acres as warehouse and light industry.
Case III : Existing traffic and Parcels A and C office
development (34 acres) + 361 acres as warehouse
and light industry.
Case IV: Existing traffic and Parcels A, C and D office
development (62 acres) + 333 acres as warehousing
and light industry.
Copies of this traffic study, as performed by Entranco
Engineers , are enclosed for your review.
Since we are only proposing complete development of the
northwest twelve acres of the subject site , we believe that the
r , t
Mr . G. Y. Ericksen
October 21 , 1980
page 2
question of impact on the remaining land to the south , or
impact of L.I .D. 314 , would be minimal . Should L. I .D. 314 not
proceed before Complex II is complete , we can see no apparent
consequence other than routing storm water , which currently
collects on our property, south along the easterly property
line and , ultimately, onto the southern half of the site as it
does now.
We fullyunderstand
your concern for the need of recreational
facilities . There currently exists ample opportunity for
walkers and joggers to utilize the sidewalks or bicycle paths
along Lind Avenue Southwest. When L.I .D. 314 proceeds, this
opportunity will be enlarged to include the eastern and
southern boundaries of our general site . In addition , we plan
to include benches and walkways within the confines of the
Complex to serve those of a passive nature .
We trust that the foregoing will serve to aid the committee in
arriving at a decision that will not require an impact
statement .
The Austin Company wants to work closely with the committee , if
possible , as we have a large interest in also assuring that the
valley is developed properly for the betterment of the
community.
Very truly yours,
R. D. Hemstreet
Assistant District Manager
RDH:dt
1
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this report is to supplement the previous traffic study
performed by the Austin Company for construction of office buildings on its
parcels A, C, and D. The study focuses on the impact to the street network
that would be caused by development of the Austin Company's parcel into
office buildings instead of the warehousing and light manufacturing the
City envisioned, under the M-P zoning. This study also investigates
potential impacts to both the existing street network and the future system
as outlined in the City of Renton's current six-year street plan.
As shown in Figure 1, the total area considered for future traffic
generation, referred to in this report as the Valley Industrial Park, is
585 acres; of this total , approximately 190 acres are known to have soils
and drainage problems which will probably curtail their development. The
remaining 395 acres were analyzed as follows:
Case I : Existing traffic and full development of the 395 acres as
warehousing and light industry (M-P zoning) .
Analysis Ia - Impact on existing street network
Analysis Ib - Impact on future street network
Case II: Existing traffic and Parcel A office (12.5 acres) + 382.4 acres
as warehouse and light industry.
Analysis IIa and IIb - Similar to Ia and Ib
Case III: Existing traffic and Parcels A and C office development (34
acres) + 361 acres as warehouse and light industry.
Analysis IIIa and IIIb - Similar to Ia and Ib
Case IV: Existing traffic and Parcels A, C, and D office development (62
acres) + 333 acres as warehousing and light industry.
Analysis IVa and IVb - Similar to Ia and Ib
• 1
1
' ..---........ "2"9---------ji" • /--—\
v,
Q.;
.... ( SW 7th St. _.
.qr
N ---- -c
tr; \ \
c
•
cu \ .
cu c. re, .... ,... \-e.i
\ T.'s\
,rt I-. .--
c-iy.-- 2<k-;40, 0-3.61
u:c
b * ,-- A106° d.--lie
\ . (,)
N 3 tt% 734
\ \\ ° 9.4
\ • . AS-c:»4c.
1-405
. \ E. csi c.3 A
rcs c?...,r-..., ,.......,_ ,01
2"---------- 3°°ID- c•cu -II
400111 ..•••••."......" • SW 16th St. 1-0-6). .‘5!. 12740 ADT vpd
-1696' P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
*el
Ay ...„. .
i- A •1.,r,‘ 4.
4 L. A SOILS OR WATER
41/
I > V A r
• 1•••‘• . I A , .••••• ..' 4'. TABLE PROBLEM AREA
MB _ -L ''
,.. 040
LONGACRESir':•:,•..-•,..-t • i ' . M EXISTING
TA
DEVELOPMENT AREAS
IA 4 4 i
c.(
I Al AVt<
'------ — r I""i PROPOSED
.a A „P.-I d., ••c : DEVELOPMENT AREAS
r ,
..„. „...,_,,, 4,. i ,...... A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
> .„,., ,. .. • DESIGNATION
\-. i
SW 27th St. 1 r.,.......7a7r.sv. > 4 f„,
a; a- •
. .
(Proposed) N f:';',..vc .:,-_.-:. • ,.,
•
1 •
44
, •
rill AV:.?:Inic A:
. -0. \ IL• r t. J. i t
v<
.........CL 1 1 1..41 ri c V 4
r
< < .4
4
. ••• .1 A I. A b, r , •,. .' ce
• 70 „.,1,••• .....• ,.... . cn
u
'
c •
1.1.1
tZr..
Cli..41- 1 ‘ ,
• ( ., ,
.....
>le, i v„•r A , y 4 i 4
r A A L A
r-r4AA >,44 8" 1. 4,4
.
\.......... 1,...",,•CA/C, 4 r• las
••• r 7.,,.. , 1,. ‘.. Li" rn
.-- a,
Ln
k , .
et/ f/
.
•
.........- .1) ,e,x_
...
•
( ....
›- /
. ,
.. _
FIGURE 1 - 1980 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
, . I1
,-,
Traffic analyses were performed to determine the differential traffic
impacts between Case I and Case II, Case I and Case III , Case I and Case
IV, Case II and Case II , Case II and Case IV, and Case III and Case IV.
The analysis information is based on the most recent traffic counts
available from the City, WSDOT, the ITE trip generation manual , and trip
distribution previously accomplished for the Austin Company by Chris Brown.
CONCLUSIONS
Existing Traffic Volumes
1. Currently, the Grady/Lind intersection operates at Level of Service
(LOS) "D".
•
2. Widening Lind Avenue to four lanes with left-turn lanes at the
intersection, and without any additional traffic contribution from the
Valley Industrial Park, the Grady/Lind intersection is likely to
• operate at LOS "B".
Case I
1. With the existing street system, upon full development of the Valley
Industrial Park (395 acres) to M-P use, the Grady/Lind intersection
would be jammed (LOS "F") . •
2. Construction of the planned new street system would improve the LOS to
"E", or capacity at the intersection.
Case II
Converting 12.5 acres of M-P zoned land (Parcel A) to office use would
not significantly increase traffic over all M-P use, and the levels of
service would be the same as Case I .
Case III and Case IV
With the proposed future street network, the Grady/Lind intersection
will operate at LOS "E" to LOS "F" , depending on the actual diversion
of northerly oriented trips.
P
Office Development Only
.
With development of the Austin Company' s 62 acres (Parcels A, C, and 0)
into office builidng alone (without other new M-P development), the
Grady/Lind intersection would operate at LOS "E", or capacity, assuming
all scheduled street network improvements are implemented.
•
i'
3
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Roadway System
I-405 is north of the proposed site and run J east-west, carrying four lanes
of traffic. I-405 intersects with Rainier Avenue S.W. with a cloverleaf
intrchange. Rainier Avenue S.W. north of Grady Way is an 80-foot, five-
lane urban arterial with six-foot sidewalks on each side. Rainier Avenue
S.W. south of Grady Way becomes a four-lane, limited access freeway called
the Valley Freeway or SR-167. Grady Way west of Lind Avenue S.W. is a
20-foot, two-lane road with shoulders on each side. From Lind Avenue S.W.
to Talbot Road, Grady Way is a 72-foot, four-lane road. Lind Avenue S.W.
north of Grady Way is a 47-foot, four-lane road with six-foot sidewalks,
and is reduced to two lanes between Grady Way and S.W. 16th Street, where
it crosses 1-405. South of S.W. 16th Street, Lind Avenue S.W. becomes a
four-lane street again. East Valley Road is parallel to Lind Avenue S.W.
and is a 22-foot street. It intersects with S.W. 41st Street served as a
ramp terminal junction of SR-167 ramps. South of S.W. 41st Street, East
Valley Road becomes a heavily traveled road intersecting with S.W. 43rd
, I Street, forming a busy intersection. S.W. 43rd Street runs east-west
carrying four lanes of traffic and is the primary east-west facility south
of the site.
r I
fl I
Traffic Volume
•
Traffic counts by the City of Renton and the State of Washington Department
of Transportation were assembled and are shown in Figure 1. Some 1979
4
counts were expanded to 1980 level by utilizing historical growth trends
for that particular facility.
The intersection of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue S. operates at LOS "E", or
at capacity duringthepeak hour. On GradyWayat Lind, the LOS is
p Y
somewhere between "C" and "D". Intersections of S.W. 41st Street and East
Valley Road, and S.W. 43rd Street and East Valley Road operate at LOS "C"
4
to "D" as well . Most other intersections in the vicinity operate at LOS
"C" , "B" , or better. 1-405 in the area operates at capacity during both
morning and afternoon peak hours.
Transit Routes
Currently there are eight METRO bus routes which provide transit service to
this area. Routes 141, 154, 157, 240, 340, and 192 travel east- and
westbound along S.W. Grady Way. Routes 155, 156, 240, and 340 travel
north and south along Rainier Avenue S.W. Route 155 runs on S.W. 43rd
Street. No bus routes are available at present on Lind Avenue S.W., S.W.
16th Street, or East Valley Road.
Roadway Improvements
There are several roadway improvement projects planned near the proposed
site. The projects are contained in the City of Renton' s Six-Year
Transportation Improvement Program dated December 3, 1979. Key among these
is the Valley Parkway, which would run from S.W. 43rd Street northward to
S. 140th Street, intersecting I-405. Other improvements as listed in the
Valley Office Industrial Park Traffic Study, dated January 1980 by
Christopher Brown can be summarized as follows:
Gj S.W. 43rd Street from East Valley to West Valley Road
On the secondary or minor arterials, the improvement plan calls for
improvements on:
13 S.W. 27th Street from East Valley Parkway
S.W. 27th Street from Valley Parkway to West Valley Road
S.W. Grady Way Bridge from Longacres Drive to West Valley Road
S.W. Grady Way from Lind Avenue S.W. to Longacres Drive
Lind Avenue from S.W. 16th Street to S.W. Grady Way
5
•i
pa
a -
On the collector arterial system, improvement programs are scheduled for:
East Valley Road from S.W. 16th Street to SR-167 Ramp
S.W. 16th Street from East Valley Road to Monster Road S.W.
Adjacent jurisdictions have scheduled various improvement programs that
will have some positive, if not measurable, effect. On the state highway
system these include:
Relocation and Reconstruction of SR-515 (1980)
Resurface SR-181, SR-516 to 1-405 (1982)
Construct 1/2 Diamond Interchange; 212th Street at SR-167 (1983)
Ramp Improvements; 84th Avenue at SR-167 (1981)
In the City of Kent, improvement programs, generally street widening and
arterial construction, are proposed for the East Valley Road, 80th Avenue
S. , N. 4th Avenue, and N. Central .
King County has no improvements scheduled on the current Six-Year
Transportation Improvement Plan for the general area.
Generally, capacity to the south via existing corridors, including SR-181,
SR-167, and the arterial facilities between these two routes, will be
improved. To the north, the significant barrier will be Interstate 405 and
Grady Way. These facilities have been addressed in the City of -Renton°s
Improvement Plan. Design studies currently are underway, including the
1 Valley Parkway to Grady Way and the Grady Way structure over the C.M. St.
P. & P. R.R. The Lind Avenue structure is given a very low priority.
6
TRAFFIC DEMAND AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
• A standard transportation planning approach for forecasting travel
demand was followed using the following steps:
1. Trip Generation - Number of trips to be generated.
2. Modal Split - Percentage breakdown of selection of various
transportation modes.
3. Trip Distribution - Origins and destinations of trips to be generated.
4. Trip Assignment - Selection of most desirable routes for trips.
The area concerned is presently zoned to M-P (Manufacturing Park) with
permissive use of office buildings. Since trip generation characteristics
between manufacturing park and office building are significantly different,
conversion to office building use would generate more traffic from this
area than the M-P use would. The steps taken to estimate future traffic
levels from the two land uses are described below.
Trip Generation
Trip generation rates assembled by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers for different land uses are adopted by this study and are as
follows:
jr Average Weekday
Vehicle Trip Ends PM Peak Hour Trips
Trip Ends/ Trip Ends/ Trips/
Land Use Acre 1000 sq. ft. Trips/Acre 1000 sq. ft.
Warehousing/Mfg. 50.0 4.5 14.2 1.2
Office 276.6 21.0 47.7 2.4
7
Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends represents the weighted 24-hour total of
all vehicle trips counted to and from a study site on an average weekday.
Average Trip Rate for peak hour represents the weighted average trip rate
between 4 and 6 PM on a weekday.
The total area concerned consists of approximately 750 acres of M-P zoned
land, of which about 110 acres have been developed into warehouse/office
(Benaroya Business Park, Koll Center) , 20 acres into an oil storage
facility, 20 acres into a Group Health facility, 15 acres into Boeing
offices, and other mini-warehouses. The western part of the subject area,
about 190 acres in all , may have adverse soil conditions which, along with
the P-1 Drainage Channel and the Valley Parkway, could impair development.
It is believed that development of this sector would not occur in the near
future. The remaining sector, about 395 acres, may be developed in the
foreseeable future.
When the generation rates are applied to various development plans on the
subject area, the daily and peak-hour trips can then be obtained. Four
different development alternatives have been developed for this study.
Case I is a development plan that calls for all 395 acres of land to be
developed into M-P use without any conversion for office use. Case II is
an alternative consisting of 382.5 acres of M-P use and 12.5 acres (Parcel
A) of office use, for about 180,000 square feet of gross floor area. Case
III assumes 361 acres of M-P use and 34 acres (Tracts A and C), or 454,000
square feet of office building floor area. The last alternative consists
of 333 acres of M-P use and 62 acres (Parcels A, C, and D), or 827,000
square feet of office building floor area.
Table 1 shows the estimated trip generation for the various development
alternatives.
1 '
8
TABLE 1
TRIP GENERATION
DAILY AND PM PEAK HOUR
OFFICE PM
WAREHOUSE Square DAILY* PEAK HOUR
CASE (Acres) Acres Footage (Trip Ends) (Trips)
I 395.0 -- -- 395 x 50 = 19,800 395 x 14.2 =
5,610
II 382.5 12.5** 180,000 382.5 x 50 + 382.5 x 14.2 +
180 x 21 = • 180 x 2.4 =
22,900 5,860
III 361.0 34.0 454,000 316 x 50 + 361 x 14.2 +
454 x 21 = 454 x 2.4 =
27,600 6,220
IY 333.0 62.0 827,000 333 x 50 + 333 x 14.2 +
827 x 21 = 827 x 2.4
34,000 6,710
* Ins and outs - trip ends
** Currently proposed for construction by the Austin Company
•
•
Yt% 1
i•
}
9
Table 1 indicates that at full development, the Valley Industrial Park
would generate about 19,800 one-way trips per day (9,900 round trips) and
about 5,610 one-way trips during the evening peak hour (the directional
split is about 70%/30%, with the majority traveling away from the area
concerned) assuming all the available land (395 acres) is developed into
warehouse. Conversion of Parcel A's 12.5 acres of M-P zoned land into
office use as proposed would add approximately 3,100 one-way trips per day
and about 250 one-way trips during the PM peak hour. Traffic increases of
7,800 one-way trips per day and 610 one-way trips during PM peak hour may
be expected should 34 acres of M-P zoned land (Parcels A and C) be
converted to office use.
Adjacent development along Grady Way will contribute additional traffic to
the street network. The proposed Earlington Park consists of 109.31 acres
of manufacturing park, and is expected to generate about 6,600 one-way
trips per day and about 1,020 one-way trips during the PM peak hour during
Phase I of the development. Phase II development would generate an
additional 8,015 one-way trips per day and about 1,050 one-way trips per PM
peak hour The 0/W offic building located just west of Raymond Avenue at
Grady Way consists of 97,000 gross square feet of leasable space. This
office has been occupied for a few months and the traffic contribution from
this office would have been detected by recent traffic counts.
Modal Split
In transportation analysis of forecasted traffic volumes a certain
percentage of the trips are assigned to different modes of transportation
such as transit, bicycle trips, or walking. In this study, however,
existing METRO bus routes operated on the periphery of the area concerned;
lack of pedestrian amenities will make transit use or walking unattractive .
�.` for prospective employees. In addition, to .reflect "Worst Case"
conditions, none of the trips to the proposed site were assigned to transit
or bicycle, walking modes.
10
Trip Distribution
Table 2 illustrates the Employee Residence Distribution Pattern as
contained in the Parkway Plaza Office Building Traffic Study and is adopted
by this study.
Trip Assignment
The trip assignments were made on both the existing and improved street
network. The key roadway links scheduled for construction which would help
in alleviating traffic impacts are improvements to Grady Way; S.W. 16th
Street; S.W. 43rd Street; and construction of S.W. 27th Street and the
Valley Parkway.
Without S.W. 27th Street and the Valley Parkway, approximately 20 to 35
percent of the site traffic (20% northwesterly and 15% northerly) would
probably enter the site using Lind Avenue off of Grady Way. This would
serve to aggravate an already congested condition along Grady Way and Lind
Avenue.
Traffic Analysis
{' The critical movement technique is used by this study to examine a group of
intersections to determine those most able to absorb the traffic increase
from the proposed project.
The intersection of Grady Way and Lind Avenue is expected to be affected
the most by development from the Valley Industrial Park. Therefore, this
, intersection is selected for an in-depth analysis by this study,
although other intersections were evaluated to determine future traffic
impact from the site.
1
i
t
11
1p
TABLE 2
RENTON AREA - OFFICE FACILITIES
EMPLOYEE RESIDENCE DISTRIBUTION
(Percent of Total )
PERCENT
Southwest Snohomish County (Edmonds,
Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood) 3.0
Other Snohomish County 3.0
Bothell 1.0
Woodinville 1.0
King County, North Redmond 1.0
Redmond, City • 1.0
North Bellevue 3.0
Mid-Bellevue 5.0
Medina, Clyde Hill 2.0
Mercer Island 2.0
Kirkland 2.0
}
Issaquah, North Bend, and Vicinity 1.0
Seattle, North of Canal , East of I-5 6.0
Seattle, North of Canal , West of I-5 6.0
Seattle, South of Canal , East of I-5 _. 9.0
Seattle, South of Canal , West of I-5 6.0
Renton, CBD and East Suburbs 6.0
Renton, South of CBD 8.0
!i. Kent 4.0
Kent, East Hill 5.0
Auburn 4.0
Federal Way 3.0
Des Moines and Normandy Park 5.0
Burien 5.0
King County, East of SR-167 4.0
Tacoma and Pierce County (Fife, Puyallup Vicinity) 4.0
The data of this table will be applicable for future years. Housing
availability will , in all likelihood, become more oriented to the south.
}
Source: "Valley Office and Industrial Park," Traffic Study, January 1980
by Christopher Brown, P.E.
12
At present, the intersection of Grady Way and Lind Avenue operates at LOS
"D" and approaches capacity (LOS "E") . Should Lind Avenue be widened into
four lanes with left-turn lane -at intersection, the subject intersection is
expected to operate at LOS "B" .
Future traffic increase from Case I development (all M-P development) would
overload the subject intersection unless proposed street improvement
projects are implemented. After the improvement, the intersection is
likely to operate at capacity (LOS "E") even without any of the office
building construction.
Development of 12.5 acres of office building of Parcel A alone as proposed
by the Austin Company at present time would not significantly downgrade the
LOS at the intersection provided the street improvements are implemented.
In fact, development of 34 acres of office building of Parcels C and D
alone, the intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS slightly
worse than "B".
Should traffic with origin to the northeastern (15%) direction be diverted
from Lind Avenue to the S.W. 16th Street and Valley Parkway, the conditions
at the Grady/Lind intersection would be significantly improved. Table 3
summarizes the projected traffic volumes on south approach on Lind Avenue
at Grady Way intersection for various development schemes. The table also
shows what level of service may be expected at the intersection under
various conditions.
<t.
##; 13
r
TABLE 3
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY
SOUTH APPROACH LIND AT GRADY ONLY
PM PEAK HOUR
. MAXIMUM TRAFFIC
DIVERSION (15%) nm
EXISTING STREET NETWORK FUTURE STREET NETWORK FUTURE STREET NET, :
Approach Approach Approach
Volumes Percent Volumes Percent Volumes Percent
(vph) LOS Increase (vph) LOS Increase (vph) LOS Increas
Current - 1980 790 D -- 630 B -- 550 B --
Case I - Warehouse (M-P) 2,280 F 188 1,690 E 168 1,340 D 144
Case II - M-P and Parcel A 2,410 F 205 1,810 F 187 1,420 E 158
(920) F (750) B (630) B
Case III - M-P and Parcels A and C 2,750 F 248 2,070 F 229 1,620 E 195
(1,260) F (1,010) B (830) B
Case IV - M-P and Parcels A, C, and D 3,360 F 325 2,570 F 308 1,990 F 262
(1,870) F (1,510) E (1,200) C
2,410 - Predicted peak hour volume for land use indicated. •
(910) - Predicted peak hour volume for existing traffic plus proposed office only.
* Northeast direction traffic being diverted to Valley Parkway then S.W. 7th Street
and bypassing Lind Avenue and Grady Way.
_ f r r
t Y �
APPENDIX A
•
Traffic Assignment on Existing Street Network
•
er
•
•
ti •
•
rl
4
_ r . , JK 90
0
N
r /
1
SW 7th St.
qzr
Plirt•S'..: a�
C
cu , > al ts•1 �i . a) .r ,
o o �g0: Grady
t / 560
.i
,�c' a 5, 0��`Z9 o '�g1.
��"�T.4., ,. 5
an� � 10.,,
I-40,' �. 2980
4
i,
SW 16th' St. `� 237440' ADT vpd
�� 1130 '; P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
/ // 1 SOILS OR WATER
Ai A ` - ....7..� TABLE PROBLEM AREAS LONGACRES ':� ::.'off' .• '. // EXISTING
v D :;1 . .' ��N /// DEVELOPMENT AREAS
.1 S .�
�`l:a • - • ( .:: PROPOSED
` L ' ` DEVELOPMENT AREAS
P.
J L d ` A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
L v L V r , 4; / DESIGNATION
i y L
r L r v , 6• i'
L w
rL d P
w•, 9 9 . 6
V q V 6 p )r.i.. :
It T V L. •
.. . . .. . .. Q 01,.., CO\C
co ir,
py v r ^ r y, 4. N 6L
'O \ • I> .1 I> r t,cr..,1
. Lw f rla. ) r�LM
q
ce ... V w< , , f^a r
< r .4 V ry
›) NS) I a
CU
iPP r-- < f Al f d ) A V I C r J A V A V r' C ' CC. I
I� rti .r L r f°"a<aw .a) • Cl)
..„.. ,. ... .. .
3f ...
n�..`°a , .„, 4 a .
ti V .1 A L A A ter+
p94 4:
l ^d �
/ijYYY ..'
/ co
! O O r•1580I 1. 1h... / //if
c�o' 1 �"'
( .
,tip
I - VA
•
og1h
CASE la — FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE TRAFFIC i
. .
-----'444..".9"---,,--•-•- • .
. • ,,
. •
•TA*12;.... .. ( .
SW 7th Ste
•
Frvii•
•
in
ip
•. . Inip
P ;
CI; • CD (NI OZ, .: 41- 0 ar ad/
, I, > \ . ! 4t 3A 2 1..t5•1*`1..1 j.
i• b•ini>,' 600.
. - JC• \ . i
.
. 1.
4'16 — c='4/..51, '.0 ,p.---
,
.. • . 9 r4_,. Ln' ............• 1-405 •
. . .... 1.6 N..— '• Jp),„6,_
i . c, c.3....- 1 ....A. - .., ..
...
.--_ - w. -• : --880i
r--...
3640 \ ADT vpd
. 41100°// . ' -fT(5-07-) P.M. PEAK HOUR vph. ,
, ,..
1.4• •••1 SOILS OR WATER
r*-7S A ^ & A TABLE PROBLEM AREA!.
-.1......2—, •
c P A ••• '''• ! •••
. A. •••1 co a , i EXISTING
!P
p..., LONGACRES . :1; DA.*:•.•..1 '''''',;•.3 1.2.,!' C•-• • •: ' i DEVELOPMENT AREAS-.1
[
,
........ ,,,
. :::: PROPOSED
4 c_ •.,
c ,' •••• DEVELOPMENT AREAS•
!-:- ! ^4 ' 7 A ? . •
•71-• • i 7 ,,,.4 V c 4• _4
0e'-'31l1.
• .
i1.:.Cry 7.,...•.4,p„'"..,,,,7:44v 4,7„vAvi-•,,AL4l',
•
1i•. 1••/•
•••'.,•'. 02..
..
Atcr s.c(amDESIGNATION• ... .vA .: Ar .
..
P ARCE.L.LV:v...1 7 cr.1.71::t AL.:14) •
• r• " VA -
a ii:).•
. .
corsi rnmi is ezd•
•
I.•• .. a) I-
ce ' % V .1 .1
wi
>e)
• 144.1 1 L. 2
• .
e- .
< < ..1 c 4 > r.. fa.'
tr .„.1.1 rA try 1 1 1 • CC ,
A s c.S.,... • Cr)
4 r—•
co 43.)
• "4.4 t. •
1.• , L.1
1 • ict›:
, ••• A• a A > r
• i• r 1 l'•
r . . , 4 4 A
4 qr.% 1 L 4
.1 1 < 4
. v.,:-I A LAA . 'Cl•
=
.:3-:. . .
1 • •
2 • A )C 4 .A:
• -, e& >
. \•••,..-.., '"•_%-.../-0 is - *
.• . .
Irv ' ,vry •
•••
*N •7 4 r . > 4 '"'01.
V 7 v
;•• ) 7 A 4 •06. •
'• 0
x // is.
11
•• 7 ci)
... ev.• , • -
/ //
_ ... .,,.
_,,, .._._ __ _ . • , r. 4.01
re-
, /co
,. .. .
1830 ..•
. .- _. • \
470 am •
d, i
—- _— ;- . • (0.97Z1.
l (0
,r. • . NC:1.!.r i•,'. •
. .
. •
CASE Ha — FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE TRAFFIC1
-:: LI
_ • . .
U,
/
SW 7th St.
� ._ �j
�' 0 `n oPo ;mac \VS
ai : > M`N ro
C ) �� ° 0-add
a 650
�s otn St* �,
a S� gg0 0 0, 0) c1 00 5
�.-40
•
•
b 150
�, ver, 30
d f0
SW 16th, St. 2970 ADT vpd
/ / ' ` 840 P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
1J d.1 SOILS OR WATER
f. > A /
,�„® TABLE PROBLEM AREAS
LONGACRES "- ,,. ) ` AJ ® ' :: :::. '/// EXISTING
DEAL: :� � , ✓//
DEVELOPMENT AREAS
7^J 1 < .. ...r C\. ...
v
A v ..., �. ...: PROPOSED
'A " < `' ' / / , :::: DEVELOPMENT AREAS
a A 7 .l L b c // '..
_.... A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
` DESIGNATION
v D U
1<r A A L a L O)r 1
A L > L r v
[c J I, a W I.' P.
b r L c 7 J a }
vp. 0 0}
D 4 , < .1 J P 7 01,E �, G ® n..
vcn P-
' - \ i L. c r f L a M Mi
11vA 4 ^ c a � �`� al n.
J r•
�' c<av c J )`n4 VI (Cr
tv J A Y A v r C \ . C 1
CO a,•nv r c 4,,a +. •(y N
r
eFJ'c nL.an Sc �..
f,..Vvr. rA G N .v.< aaLs k
fv ,r A L J A 5,
I rLAA ?< L +• .4
A7 a v•
I
. .... IL v r- L
J
11y r 7„ a < 7
f
'\pv 'L ' 'LAac .99.... •.,
c o .
1 � " ` La CoMO
A ^ ' /co W
/��� g0g77/7 /7 'ts* r\I '
Mti,S1C-74
III /41*2200i •/ /� c' 8 r I
5
( ›-
•
03,•‘1,
• 111/71 .
CASE llla - FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE TRAFFIC)
. + �•c yQQ .
v)
•
SW 7th st. -
N to
0 0 NaNI
'. \ > cbo Zg10 Grady
a r,,i
\ F-a-; St-
i ice' a. Sl O- 6' C) ..pCb O 6`D90
1‘10 c,N,, ® I-405
-I � 120
.. SW 16th St® • 400 ' ADT vpd
Q
�� ,4.•..,f ,/ // 306. P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
/ -Jr
1, A tarty • SOILS OR WATER
I,` '^ r � ,P.q 1 v TABLE PROBLEM AREA:
- r, r<a <> c "a ...1 ...O.'•®
LONGACRES ::.n M .••..0•• •• EXISTING
�' •••� :O' DEVELOPMENT AREAS
l •r•
1
^';;,�< .... �,.,� --7 \\///'
.... PROPOSED
r P. DEVELOPMENT AREAS
J7 "` •` L A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
- DESIGNATION
17•rJ77 .' 4 > J : /
J v w Vr A !I n r O '�c J> c v v �1iI' � � > ` r c a� > O L[1 � �1
p1r
I� v " w -+ c.r 1I1
•v A a c .1 1,7 O
` � •
11��v J V7r `w` ^t O
\ 0 " 7 r . r v CO M 62'
a 1 cam war <U. N-
I ! < J r < .r if-- lfl
`, r. I v A w V " V r l• `L
'a r ! d Y
I, J r`.. I. > c �.
l'i;
3. • 1-
L > L ra n A.w
6, <w < < L .-Ar7 ►
7, • •%NI.V>7et7 rJ >, c �wO
$ r r V ` 7
. .S/r/ii.7 . •//: ///////// )i ,/glict? ,
540,
( .
,�h��o O -,
ti
i
iki
CASE IVa — FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE TRAFFIC !
APPENDIX B
•
Traffic Assignment on Revised Street Network
•
•
vi
( SW 7th St.
\ N..
a
\
I \ \ i' S\A ,Oth o 9.
1 • ' E--Zr----'4411Cike ' 840
):;..., • 51146, 1-405
SW 16th; St. '° 890 i ADT vpd
, 41110% .r� , 0 250 I P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
1 I;A /R SOILS OR WATER
1„kiii�� ^ ^< < r TABLE PROBLEM AREA5.
I< r ><L .... . ® • • • MEXISTING
i LONGACRES•
I J < A D L•. ..-�• o c::.•
1-*;i e ^ : ; DEVELOPMENT AREAS
.�,.1� < :--�- ::: 1 PROPOSED
n 9 < L > • 15' : :::.l DEVELOPMENT AREAS •
BA r
7
• I< p. A L 9 r ��' A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
` L " <v r DESIGNATION
> vn�, , L
.9 / 11 ./ .f. , V , , r,/ :
�•
0 :' SW 27th St. Fs-406.0'4-j 4'550�o (Proposed) ' 6' 1 0 :
? '1 -Oo t
'; ��1 0' r7.
" �1N' N �1 •
N >V j ` er L ! p p ``N P
7•- N
0 n" , r'le A� v Q1 ilf i by
. -c; \ 53. LJ c e. Np[ O�vr} wa r ^,,
S.. c •e A 4)
!, >), ,,erl 1<^4 A V:1 .14 : 41- 7 ..-- tO
M A V P 1. 7* Cr'
•jf > w `L,v A Y<A r 4, a/).
' ram" ��L >< "'�f L 7 la
Q- J rL., A2. c
v ,T.1 A L A A .r.
r1 <A^ >< L L
•
w>a 4
L , L
7` r
r
v 7< „ p I,ri4 wO�O..
/Z:77///0 /1/7 ////,/rVli '
r- N // O O
a) :767 / ;` rn t1f /�Q) ir) N�
N. � M r�
790 I b a. // �/�i/ .1 `''o h
S 2 30 ! > >� /SW r /S,t. ':/i,?o ,"
•
. oro...'
nro.
.' CASE lb - FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE TRAFFIC
r 1 yrl ,s
a
cn
. i ._.
(..,
SW 7th St. I
cz;c
' \� �� a' 6-4
of o F �� 0 6radY
a
ie. 0 5:1 pth St'go �o �•� yr
20 lc,�� .7'- r`° I_405
S - 86 t
t '411 8
8910 ! ADT v d
,� r•
2520 i
I J � �. P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
I ^ SOILS OR WATER
$ �/ ^^ ' ''v ilil .
TABLE PROBLEM
r _ 0 LEM AREAS
.. "' EXISTING
f, L A
LONGACRES 1' ` ^I ////�
L L ^ ^® L :i .... N�N.� C d!//
F:TT.r ^ ': DEVELOPMENT AREAS
,.A<` •.'. �,,._, • - ��. • PROPOSED
A /'::: DEVELOPMENT AREAS
J A ' J L y< //
V ..
'"<tl +? A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL.
/y �` `" ' ' J: : -•• DESIGNATION
r < , v, b p
1 � / I J L n�•
o / SW 27th St. 1,./V;. 5070 ::.
n (Proposed) �_ .3 1310 I1: L. A.
I J�O, ,i 'v J v P O 1
q
` '�% �• �. ,p < q O O '�' Olt
I. �i v J Y7p tAL 4 . O O ..:; r.\I
\ pc..,."7" A I. �• O tD a\ a. LV < 4 6. 1 n
RS V ." , '')
d pp�v< J r A V r-" ko
< < V < J ' o.• tor AA v A v r 1• CC
r.. .se
>�A r' <A)<J P 11) N
3.
r A ) r
� e.y r 9, A < A 'Cr
A L J A tt
� - LI
CU
,_ri I • Iti n7 J, r y T
, . \...,.. 'f.:,>^,..vr."Fis:
L r J D7 O Pr:,...
�A�O
1 • <L V �.1 V > • NO a O
,, /,/
. 4! //%/'
' ' 910 1 /.*- - *S' 17.: '', 4.:0),A0 //
: CO , ,/9(55...
j7,/ clol ' g\cci,'\
CASE IIb - FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE ! TRAFFIC'. •
! 1 •
C.\)
.1 SW 7th St.
N \ , N
¢ \® S� � P', N �yo 330 16, Grady
- \\'\
\\` . .. . .,.--...' .. t.1 1'1 0P, .-14 C
3o Sl 23
- - `'6'`o/ s�0 o 1 1_405
"d. L -+w 415o i
./ -- 930
�. r- -
• SW 16th St• r° .pool ADT vpd
I400 ,..... 0
// �,� 110 i P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
, .t � SOILS OR 41ATER
c Jri` �i/ I < ��� � r...:„. w r _1"l .�.--- • � TABLE PROBLEM AREA.
I �� ~ ::�
< r ^
I. LONGACRES �. J `> LDJ•. •T
' %�� EXISTING
r a : 1 DEVELOPMENT AREAS
I Ji,t' t .. ...
� .�-=► --l- :::: PROPOSED
" ' ` j :::: DEVELOPMENT AREAS
n
` < ��/
c r a n t A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
)r
L[ )" r DESIGNATION
lA
, c n
,o SW 27th St. ���;'.'r 5860 !
(Propose �6�°, 1350 _. : /
o°' (Prop --�
. "1.• , 000 t 77-" o 00; \;°-�ti,1,"
r
Nr r•b ►•'r t• t t
O O
O r r ^ r e. CO M r4 .
•
• -p 1
Ll " < r La 00Cd
O > A car ON >1
CL < r t J Y•• lfl
> `, w a < " r L N I. ri
a A V A V r r , 7•• d'
Yr;1-3 ). ...)�A.�><n< > L ) >
F J w > < tt
3 <1> r w < n �,
a) < >L. a
r. ' A >< t {. • �-r1
L L,J > p
•
j/ ^VW4lsref '2" ,
',f I //'// // / /' / / / 4, c O`1.
22 0 �°GI) " /r-oc3I
#.‘ . cty; 2 -
.i . sz/.‘,in"' . -...
CASE Illb - FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE TRAFFIC .
.1 s't f Sloo f
cri
( sz,
St.
N ,`\ SW 7th -..-..Pb
.k
n r ' ai
> — 60 rally
¢ g° 10 G
ill
As \ \ o v 110 0°
zv al o o 00�00 6i I_405
1
, ` Et NIN
..... �;
SW 16th St. I:...
176o 200iiiiTABLE PROBLEM AREA..
I = Ir t ..4 ...o l// EXISTING
LONGACRES D [:.. . .o 1�
PL. •.1 •.: DEVELOPMENT AREAS
•► [1A r
1J rig [ •• r.
`„ .-�-•-- :::: PROPOSED
> ' , • DEVELOPMENT AREAS
i' ' ,
1 •C r 4 r
J
A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
L.
[^" r DESIGNATION
,' / I r a 6 r
J ( V p
`' o SW 27th St. 1\-1,.,,'o,7P. 6r950 ;.
0,,,° (Proposed) o®� 1450 •• •
:1....:::
or
c:, .. ci,
�v 4 r Oir- c) 4.
�-
N r t^[ ^F C O •-Q ,.
(CS-)
rt.
V 7rn r � Nr` Cd
, "C.; \ 1N1 CV
p ppp < , ^ J
4 f... l0
VCA
< < J r > P. rtf•.
1.
f3 r b VC4 r.....�
V r i> r w < ^
{ 3 V r A 4 j >t i 'd'
r-e-� an^ >< < b,d
les ^7 Z
•. 7 V
1 /'1({f5(.'/,'�`.09°!/j' ��
3, - ic/////.//` .9 M O �
1360 ��'7y;� a O o 1
i •
/•v
CASE IVb - FULL DEVELOPMENT SITE TRAFFIC
APPENDIX C
Traffic Volume Comparison
.t
.:.. ,
,,
. .
0.?..• .._.... ,__. Cl;).
/
cl,
. •'cz-
, ...
SW 7th St.
, .
lc)
• ..• \VS
W • > CNI <il Gradl
\ 71; 610 '...-- .
ni nth - "v..5s,, •
t\ .
' . g. V - • °' - ea-, *,3,< -
; . . _.; . ,,,::3, &.:,,A.2..'"\k CI'• 7 . tp:: ,_405
. ,
, _ 'r•-• e•-• ''.rik
, . ..,....,.......,411 ..II .k.::••111.01. .17_9....
oo,•0'............,.............................................m.........' .11:1 ' : cu 0
41111111L,,,,•_„---_,,....-- . .. .. SW 16th St. y ....ers, ...,
2800 , ADT vpd
i A• ..„,___„,
• P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
, ,, 2220
` callo— • , ...,, / ,
c 7 . • .
. • r
4.. - SOILS OR WATER
., 4 •
N-
A 4 ,
-I V_'••
4,,..„.._,,,.. . ' ' • TABLE PROBLEM AREA.
A > r A , ,
I...4U..".'1`...r ... ' 1.. .....IONGACRES t'vr_.',A,„...,.c.a....,lr'•'., .2;-•,'•a,D4- P,,..L..,: ......
.....C
.,
// EXISTING
// DEVELOPMENT AREAS
A A L.,4 '•...:.a...L............-..• . •-•••:•-•
7A 0 1„,„„ D E v E L O P PROPOSEDM
ENT AREAS
,• , v: A A 7 7 A
. .4.7 ..., ,Nt ,. 4• A - 4!../
. 7•C „ a A L 7, • A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
DESIGNATION '
; . .." > ,, >V A 74.,,, 70 L. • . -. • - ,
\-___ 4,:r. , ,. .. ., . P. • L
P P•< 4 r v 4 " :
' VA,,, 7 „ 2. •'* 4 •
• ,
, ..J.v A y c A •0 '- • :
. I V r A A , A L 4,r•:: : i / IL
'i
. ,
••
I.., ..' > < . f" 7
CA*
I,I * a)
-.0
. "AV v 7f
v A t4t'1 Oro Cd
•
. t, L.4 •c• 1.. Lr AV 0
. Ce
4:u r--
I., ,
Cl.) I. r.,ic n:A::.: L 4,
(.6 (13
i e-- . l•v"A rA y A y)r c CC'. cel I s P.va.,a vi,A"-%P. W V);
, . '
. ›. >
1S-C
. acC
t c 44,.,Fs „...:::,
lir" .• v A A L A =li , ,
1: )A c A,CA -I A S
I. 4( , , le : ,A .
.. i.i...,..,Ar< , ,...
.1. . "Ns\I.v;• , r ., 4 . 1 t, 0 Ze*
r 1••r ' v ,'s L ,
., •, L. is -- . .
•
d707_,r . 4
• //77 / ' \AL''4 ?.591
(...• 71; "r1.4/ 1.fr 1,1,s.‘te
..:e,
I, . , • . .
TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE !la OVER CASE la
q .
'.V .
........___
• yUU
1, v.)
Q.
1 '•
SW 7th St.
\. jai
I > a' co g.n
o ,r,..,b.,:ki
50 Grad`
�` Q goo 0 1.�
•- b \ r-o.-) 90
^`L5 o ,O�.In 5 p �16,0SW 68 ®j\O
a moo• ;",
o `'�6arAS0 �'p•4o.�, I-4055
EIli yV
•to : ',..----- ----16
a� 110 - i
a
SW 16th St. `� 77801 ADT vpd
JiM
30I; ,.„. ....440 • °,. A- , J �' TABLE PROBLEM AREA
'' - r < P , AJ •. (T' ...o o g EXISTING
LONGACRES 6 V DA,.•• •••N
A. :::E DEVELOPMENT AREAS
V A in
d A G
t..<.,- ::_„�•�,.,� .e :::: PROPOSED
7A 1 , L > • •'•: DEVELOPMENT AREAS
n
J A J c d
1 Vp.<" A AUST I N CO. PARCEL
L 7
` / DESIGNATION
V > V A d > b
liiiii ►' A a < b �•
Iar >.l V A 1/< A J .......
w > L •
�, . . 1
A 4.4
> < 1.J v r V 1.I
(' r vrAtl aJ ,., isl t� 1
I q C
glitg -T:t
p-ci \ t.•,, 4 r t L .,t
l
a <j r ( A y
> I_1wa -1v re. N r.
RD
r I v A �• A V r C y' 1 Q'
�� Y w yr <A v<A
• 1 i. "'• > .. , y�l� i
�.� ,><n cJ w > r Yam 1 11
L
I�� c 1> c A < n 'O•
3 ^V eA< J a L 4
IV ,r> A L J A •••••
` rk <AA >< < b •
TJ
n7 P 1 V
'�_c. 16 >A9 V L
i r r'V�P•�J P V
`V r ]
J e N v.7< V J ` C • •-
1 / r 4 *O 1
•
,., .. >,,, / ,, , ` , ;. v • �fi
/ // 11, //r" In 1 ;
.•. r-- i 1/1,111/ %,9M;S%0/ i '
'-‘%\i,
a ( ,
do /,c5/?i
t
TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE Illa OVER CASE is
, : i
y_
I' (
SW 7th St.
• 3 ....
N \ N
• O O
Q '. •� > �0o o �a 30 r a68 a
�a� /
r 2'�0
A% \ o SW pt�► 3 o `)� .
1 a o olyhtiho7. `'�oo .r- 1_405
. . . 0, ,,,.i,..-orio 2 _140 •
170 '
SW 16th St. b 340 ADT vpd
d a fr � 40 ' P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
VLA SOILS OR WATER
,Ati AJ [c A P , -_.,-,.. - - • TABLE PROBLEM AREA.
/ ._
'LONGACRES • L�::is -DA�:.•••1 •.. o C : �l EXISTING
• : � ` DEVELOPMENT AREAS
I1 VJr�O .. ...
✓ ii
` ,; •••—• :::: PROPOSED
7 ,/`
✓ < DEVELOPMENT AREAS
q / J
t. I....Z.)
" [ ` s• '' A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
` � `V DESIGNATION
J > YA>J > a. •• _...
r Y r
I'•''J 7 7 a 4 J :
V V n b.r
w
11
> V>l.41 Y ry
J
V A < V !,7 o 0 O Q�
`> Y J Y CO IS1 �� O`
1 ` A 7 !' ^//cc
fw [4 c Yi !11 N l ��
„> n iBc d >$.
•
d I., wsa S V r L r'
• Y A Y r C u �• d'
. �� r J
• I.
Yc> L > > Li
!• 1 w > 4
' O Y r'1 L
f)/ Ir s c A < w
,," cA ` 1 L. 1
IY<AVA A 44 A •p.
!• w s 1 j
• i '` •• • I` '� . V •. .
r
• ;7[L Y V'1 Vt
•�f A 1 L 1 O 'o
'p V7 V )L. A <• '� Cp 0
, • " \i ' 7/.f / O. 1 ,./ ///7:1 illb .
, >)W 7/ 1 CO ' °?it.'
1130 ; o: AA��„ cc, .),,, ( 7- /7/ i 3 j3.. q�� l00%
TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE IVa OVER CASE Ia AA
, .
__.
, v.)
1
.
t.r)
°a) •
> .
..c c
. .. '
SW 7th St.
Lr) rn
IN.
C)Co 630 %...:...........--"*****-........."
n,
i N
S‘i1)*-- 9° ' 1),. ' ' 1 .._
I . .
i • • 01111:073 O-'‘'l Nc°' / riPikob. 1-4°5
..,..---,
! .
, ..-7....— S
,- . '4 1340' ADT vpd
.------)-2.20 ;
i 4011111101LoY---_----". . :_. ,. SW 16th,, t.. .
4-7 P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
Af
.; i A •
,z -gepof ,
. . , _
c - .,.. .. SOILS OR WATER
'1 •4 7°
.14 TABLE PROBLEM AREA
7 EXISTING
LONGACRES v ..• " - C
''D .:v r A •••• '''''''''' CNI DEVELOPMENT AREAS
-.1,,I 14 , •••• .. ".
e•. ... A 4 t .c.< ...
A A v t........4. .Z.j.......'.•• ••• ' 7 .... PROPOSED
•, -7,1 .1 ,c 4 j .,
'' •••• DEVELOPMENT AREAS
. . 4, V 4• -1 /,/
,, . ),•Cqi,,4-11 : i l' ' . A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
4. .., 47 r:
DESIGNATION
v A 71 I. ' ,///
`,,, 1:d :,.> V 4, l' '• : .'
l'.fr'
'i g'':At': ..11.I-4,r:: : •
• .
['I :p. 4 4‘.4 gl*'
if 2' ‘• 4 1' e t < i t 1 I .-
-': Clo -1:1
0') trj IZG. . •
:. • \ [ L"1 '1' el::
Cd
. Es,:.:., ..% , A :- •CIJ• I--
•-: VD
>,Q,
I..1 r:4.1i 1:1 r L. r-:-. I-4
r V) rtS•
e-- t•s,4 44 •A NI A4:r.,
CC
1--- i, .
'cu 4 I A; -Cl •
.
.,,
..• > La .
1-4>''r.v.% P. > r 4
1 3 . ' •
Z....
'';i \ .,. V•• 7, ...IL
...1 ty"• r C : . , .
., 1 ••. Is. ,7,, .1,^...1 •
e N''')7 4'7 A] . lq. , •
; I ‘ ,..r 1 A,e V A i •Ic A)*I '
. 1 v •
'' /f//e.,/, /7 1 !,
i . i 4 / 1 . I
4 \
co rn . cr, Crl,
• ' ........„.„.,/. a) '1-%• ev t,
1 ,
:,.;;, . 370. .-• 17,3- Q.'"
›. / / 'dr d/n".. el) :/1./•°. . / ,
.,„
30 •
'I(
. ',..,,. .
':`.,,.: • , '' 's\\ • .
ev tv
..... . TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE Illa OVER CASE Ila
,:f:'iF,'. . • ,
. .
. ,
. ,
•
vl
(
4‘..
SW 7th St.
f.n
,::, . , •••.
.*
• .. ci.)a.)
cr ••• r•-• 0) /\ ..,..-.-----.Z.-
b • r-• g1\ ' A 3‘j
CU 2\
N
CV, 1.1. In
o sNA Ot 260 , p (9cP,
et, ---• .904
. .. . _ >, ...........__.......i. .. 1670
1 rts ........----* .........._......—• . e
.0'e°. •,----------Z CU ``-----6!
1 3
. _....0,0401 ...... -- ..70
i 920 , ADT vpd
410. • SW16th_.%" ------- rSto ' —
, . '. .4.6- ...„.._,...,
70 : P.M. PEAK HOUR vph. ,
ir ,4dio,pg.
; r
q - , , -, SOILS OR WATER
., 4 • ,A -, ., V A• 4 , ........ , TABLE PROBLEM AREA
->i".411i AA A
. ....4 wain.6.7.•, '-' 1
EXISTING
. co LONGACRES :111;1 •sD44.,.....-:1 :::c,n, c.
-••1 .. //// DEVELOPMENT AREAS
4,, 1.-1., ••••1 ... r. '
.115..4 .....1 ......... ,
.:.: PROPOSED
7l'..,-I L to.Z.V0/ '••• DEVELOPMENT AREAS
• is 4 is ? J •• • .-
4 i ,,, ,V ,. .9• A Agg '
- 3.0 , , / A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
•
i. ,, t,., r .4 4.. ' DESIGNATION
.,
• > VA 7j 7 I. • .
\ A,.''. :,.> ,..', .• .- ,
• .
•
A. •
.
471 :/ A
, .. ,
r.t. 1..4 1,, 4 7 r• ,
r4c44.1
1 S r• v . ,.4 c..,
•1 ) 4 .a p.-4 CC:34 g
'V r4 1 1
in ‘c) ce 1
' . t:c..17< 1.7
13 \ CO
f.
CC 413 IN.
..• lis v,... -a: , 4';
i'•••••• 4.10
. >1 1.1 A4.% 1 '' 1•• L. ,-r. 1-'1
a)
1.• < C V c a > A a V) W.
1 e--•
CCI
1Z, , 1.• r I
l .,- ., 1'A) r 4A L A
i .1 3, .( -5
IV c:A A L 44 •In•
=
7.:j•1 .
l'IN„44 :< t 1
1-.,
\
' . •
... .... 11:.)^vvniv .41
..° 74 tk*.i•
..1`..
0 a
y N
., . If/ ii i, 4
,
0\0\
.
›. / 4
( ''''%\ i
TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE IVa OVER CASE IIal.
'Lo
. .emu
N
z.
(
SW 7th St.
•'\ d � o °$ Grady
�(NI \ 30 139 I
a S� pt� 1oOp° ,-,
�oM M O r I-405
• ro %------,',11.1 .4---0-1
w 801
SW16th, St. 300 '° 90o ADT vpd
�'�3 P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
.4W— .., ; A
rtic SOILS OR WATER
A• J4 TABLE PROBLEM AREA,<;_e_t_ .
G
c A r . ` ........ _..ram
. , a,
✓ < r A • a o EXISTING
LONGACRES IL:L J< A D 4•':' ... '7 �' .....C.... . %�
��;i;r A i M DEVELOPMENT AREAS
A.1VL<< el- -- :::: PROPOSED
'A ' L• ' ••••• DEVELOPMENT AREAS
7 L. Y�
< •�d ri •
/ A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
r
' < A A 1- 7r . /
..1 > V A 7 J 7 L
DESIGNATION
Ar A 9 c ^ L r.
r.
- r L d r V. < e 1
IJ<r AAA L A L V?r::......
' �/. 1:1 1F1 ^ J'V<A VrVp ,,ryr < <^JA ��Cfl ` 1
A r J c V {
��yy,,1�•V •� A< V r 7
1''V J Y'r t.AL O 4 ..A I
rAv y r n e Y, �'
it w VO, LV < S.
L A
1. V
v rA, 1 nA r <I).
E 1 I.9 I, A .i V r L J T err.v<�c AV c a A r. CO C.
V A v r l' •
>•. CC
IAA rVL,r A 7 c A r
c „7 ,� L S< Yr A L Y y> 1/1
I• •a r /, A c �•�.
L
3 Ir Y r 9 A r •%< /. sue.
4.
rE ,V A e, A L., A .^
.oo A A A< L L
r ..7J
'�.. , r L
7 'aAA cr.'•rv'' _ p
•
'y r7v L ,+ � \ MM
V 7 L r aL� L Aj�... � 1
.iE A J'1 S O
✓ 3 1 J 9 1' O
.d./d(i,e‘
7 /
0 /,04 \-,,,,\,.:.\
,,,, . r/i/le
yr \-)f /1/7
// /914'14‘ /- Vt 1,0. 1, /
...\
' �' o /o,
i TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE IVa OVER CASE Ilia I
Y
-'' J(�Q - ,I'
• '' i
( /2"rQjce.:
�� SW 7th St.
Ln
. \
\ /\ NCD
N o. Grady
Q o p2
•Cti'\ \ o SWpth St. s�o\ All' •\ �2� \
41116., I_405
\ mil.
.4411N" 40
• Ti
1 SW 16th S `�
�: � 6970 ADT vpd
�.. '^/ :/ //,;, 1168. P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
1 -,i" SOILS OR WATER
w J• j 1 V y
4. r �„t® _ - TABLE PROBLEM AREA
r.,. c-. -
< r ' EXISTING
• LONGACRES d < ofo c A'�", ` : tt • 00 °O DEVELOPMENT AREAS
v r < r..
V;.�� ---g----- / :..: PROPOSED
IA.:I ' ," ' : DEVELOPMENT AREAS
A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
• Lv DESIGNATION
. l'l . < w tl;r y r1
? •
i SW 2,7th St. ' 530 '
...
\\,\. (Proposed) INN.
-0 • 30 : ... . —. ' 1
'y�Y ,
,,.74/,:.Al•.A.,
cd
'C) v c p
< V r �%t1,
N v 7r "t o} 37
LV < v L gig
i < < .i < w > w, N rtf•
r- v J w v n v re C[
t� A nrvr <w><.r 4) . V)
. �' �L ><,'<> L ) > 11.E
a r 4r > c s
L
3 >f�1v c n < , a t AA fs
r:Lr ry .
v � � 7� 7
i > et r v r '
; i
d.ii‘e,. ..,..to„. ,4. 11fr .
, ..-
///j // // ,7 /0 , 5�,,
.........„ ...
120 t ` O/�
* ; i �W43 •( ti II o
1 TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE Iib OVER CASE Ib'. •
' N
SW 7th St. —
oo .,
ti �a�
\ \ > ;), �a
0 ;� Brady
co
I , .
\ am ° 1
, ,I., . \ \ i .
40 o pt, 00 • t.,.),
02
1_405 .
m .
rn. . ,
• . \ . . ': ....,.. .0 _.....s,T 1v()
...._,
. , ,.,..,____:....-- : • . 0' 90
, ,
i -A SW 16th St. ..t°:....:.
490 ; PDT vpd
' .°I40 I P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
666 SOILS OR WATER
r$44,11Fte,•4011°."......
w A ..,A
: t r ._ , J ' TABLE PROBLEM AREAS
¢ ram' A •' EXISTING
L';ONGACRES ! D �.:: :000Aoo : •
�//
11: w ([ /� DEVELOPMENT AREAS
4- 1:I`` w •:_6 ..:may
a y< •••�.--— .. --- y _ :::: PROPOSED
I" tom` >' :::: DEVELOPMENT AREAS
A
1 , " 7 -� L t•C �
' " t▪ V ` ' ' �' A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
I'v
` DESIGNATION
D b"> t > LJt� . t r v
4 ,
O I .
o SW 27th St. �`rS'a=r2400
• /
'o . L 1
(Proposed) � 150,
q 1 •
• •
,I, 'A LL .t p<J d,J Q Q Q
> t p
O ^v;^sw fin' A ^ p r ` 1
Q t" < J/f`��„ Q1
MI
• \... o�v ws A •1 a
' t a " wa P. d
1c < a c + >
n
to.
_S Iv � ^ vwvrt'
Av! < >< 1 ,ti dC
.(• � r
La
r O. n >
td 1..4.•
,v ntea[w.. =
.rr►r vt" -
r1w > c
1 \ 'c....
>A Cr e- <1.
r7 41V 7 t r^ < "I.
1
fw-lLrA,y rO '
} • 'I 4' r n 6 L. f ,''t '// ,/./({ e /7,0 ,///
' . .•. >,,//,;/ . • /7/ . /.,. ,0 CACg.,
,i ' ...................."°. a) :,:i--i ,, ,:tt ,%. cr)
,� Pr "
TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE I I Ib OVER CASE Ib,
, .„.....,.........:„..,00....._Ji.e n 7.
..,— .
v.,
ril
it
's-
SW 7th St. •
• r \ ••••'"'
C.)
g..."' 9C• ..6:j"'.*° .5*......'''.'''.'''...."/L°6 8
7 43.• , 5 0
St* ,
10\1 Oth (90
cN0;
\ % " n) c: 'JO JP--
0 11111`g c',.... :b (? ---/ 4116, 1-4o5
..e.----v-
•01...:. -----------. a). 50
• SW 16th St......
.—.
1270 ADT vpd
401 '-..,--/-'-'•-•° -' --.1‘g.k ,., .5
A ,,-----y
\P.M. PEAK HOUR vpi
, 440
,Aw A
SOILS OR WATER
, -
TABLE PROBLEM ARE
., P > A.,
LONGACRES
.40 cf, C EXISTING
Av ,-4 L r A .... .. 1,Zi• C‘I / DEVELOPMENT AREAS
A 4 < 4 <
A [....:..1 PROPOSED
•"""1 DEVELOPMENT AREAS
(Proposed) it? , 4,r,
,. A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
1 , .., -•.• , i ..:
a, g• " DESIGNATION
l '..P---c)osi ' ScW\-27th St. 4477-v60t0 ::
em,•• •ex.....ma em....m.•m........,...... c ...r,-.....›.•
5 Nii*I, v : : . A ___.........--
/ evrty.
-0 1
' . ..\%. cI10Au.1.,WL'•,<
cc1--•
st\
• tirw
0 ' 1 I rte ,•1,'V °-1,`„4, '
c--- ,.-4
r et" 1 .c C
o v A V A r e Ce
1.
i 7t; ?,_•) ' A... Cl)
.• I^-' r), Puai, ... ..33 ,
r„,... A- ) ,.
.c. %.) .
kt Ill
O. u„,,i _: AAA:
>4.,..'
1,A , ,
... , , ; •
• -0 9•744
1 \....._..„ cr.."1 I
*** 7 v 7 4
)
)..
,„ • ///
,7 y
1 -• >, 7 .6176 o\S.'
.e rci2 cei i
i * 1 .-• r-- ,
1 •=c-N. >. / .
* 1
(
1 .
TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE Illb OVER CASE Illai
i,
-n yoo
cN
4
SW 7th St. cr
1` / � N a{
1— 5
v3,„
,\ ,,,, A930
czc
tis \ 3 0 \ 21® ; i
A\ I \ o. SW _'Ott ' o ,r--
\ ... oil at 4" '`-:./ A( .41116,„ 1-405
a
I 1 ..... ----• •- ,...a) 'Ilic44111 170 '
SW 16th St. 5� 70 ADT vpd
�o`�o 50 I P.M. PEAK HOUR vpt
/ SOILS OR
A A • WATER
F.,..•-"*Tat ^ ^c ` r ,..,p...- i
1 " TABLE PROBLEM ARE)
,,,, .....11 r-
LONGACRES
' I c, EXISTING
A "®> :• ...• co F.
DEVELOPMENT AREAS
8 .. .... CO
*O
" p <
A J <r < VA :::: PROPOSED
' •••=• DEVELOPMENT AREAS
P
A 7 `, L b c
17v< V <PA•
< ^ a A L 7 P • A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
`
"
/
DESIGNATIONi [ ,
A " . P V L
; 6 °' SW 27th St. i �s ,- ::o7 40tLi
r (Proposed)
r 150 44.r ,
1,4,..t...:;.a I.
ID om(I V .,PrALA .
O v 7eAry •
,
fa-
M o.ti &" < v s a L < A A
i CI- < r < " p. to
� v 7 w a 7 " r a. � r.. 1--1•`v c c " c •+ > , . as
1 r C Q'
:_s
I .]C b >c c> t > > �
(' 0_ J P`J n > c Q.
P
P A, r` cV 7.'
L
• 7 r 7 y . t
pp
t Vr7 L P` > r a j'C
4 7 isf4gr . '. . 4'/./Y4 '
:, , ,„ 4 c;,
7 0 12 c7;1\02\
..• >, y, i /
,.. C.-4
-4--a- ›. , 1 ,‘,.):41, 1//0../ .:.•9‘9 , /
( , am
9•4\-/‘ ' ,
�8 �
-4 TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE IVb OVER CASE Ib'
F:t
1
.,
• ,, 1R90
N
} Cil
/ SW 7th St. Q"
sz•
G C .. 7
I
S S� pth 6. -,o .r r,,i 8otr, � I-405
1 0�
' . � ... SW16thSt• .
,r 930 ADT vpd
i4 I ti# � / W 70 P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
Al I � / � � • P
/ R,
° i/ I A A 1:t1 SOILS OR WATER
�� i •. ,.•.., TABLE PROBLEM AREA
t :LONGACRES I P.
® . ._ �' •• �//� EXISTING
v ! 1:'�� a .1 ............. `^ % DEVELOPMENT AREAS
A J , <
"""'®' iPROPOSED
1,4 A ,_ a I:•.::-:.1
DEVELOPMENT AREAS
17 V e`• >^ AUSTIN CO.
° " A PARCEL
y • >" DESIGNATION
aS Y e
,F arO�i SW 27th St. 4 4 r,v• <n •
...._
__ I� �o 7 1880.j
y 7.. (Pr;oposed) 140 1 •• A.
0,.
1 o .► r
,.:„. ,, . 1-9'
,> _��` r> p ® r 1 ` 11
c4 in
•
10
' Q' O1v a• >j1/aar
I >1 cLii,<,,.....:. ,,, ,_ ,
cu
7)-
R7 Ywr ,..�vA><.^r Al . N
I.
kr
t•7>1.r w s w
> .A;<A< J >L A
� a� w c� A
T-- [ A > C
< L .,J
c '� CO ^», ram. . .,
•r7 y d
r >
f V 7 A 7 Vrs •
O\, ..:CO O
ma
,,
i (iti/A ///r 41.:
1
i j/j / jj o o 42),T ,
i, i .......„. a) I')
rc. .)\ 450 ,� o,, i ! 90// 1
(
M \‘, 1 ro
•
co
a TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE IIVb OVER CASE Ilb
a.
•
I 1
' N
it
SW 7th St. `r
\........•.....-... ..,,,,.7-„
ol,,.:1/4:1
�.
Q \\ /\ "c , `sue Grady v1
a
ti r3 ,�' 8
0
ai g
'\ �. 0 541 I Ott 6 Pp - °8°
)ic 175 .° ' �l I-405
—P.
I` _ 790 rod _ .j :
so
• SW 16th St. �,.
e00 ADT vpd
�; °„ P.M. PEAK HOUR vph
r
�� I ,,- SOILS OR WATER
A. ^ ^ < 1ZL j r TABLE PROBLEM AREA
+� EXISTING
LONGACRES ..••'• .. ••• • J"/
� "�y ^�`•: "' �' .�� DEVELOPMENT AREAS
I v r 7 L.
✓ ..:� ... MJ
� — •• PROPOSED
✓• u -s.-• • -< ' f::::l DEVELOPMENT AREAS
w �/
" ' .1 L r<
P >
<",`.. P.4 w •r J
•
• At/
A AUSTIN CO. PARCEL
1` r ' •• DESIGNATION
......>:
rr w y [ n
•
��°I SW 27th St. <
I ..'c)..s7
77/�/�/1 •.y6� • (Proposed) R\�F° 1�-1 ¢iV
100!
3
▪ c <�a� , , M
• a) •
I i• 7 • r" ,
r
y rP < "t o 1
i 03 • 124. .-
, NOf..Ar �.i^ ^r r•f •
•L7 aL V c I. > CG
S_ " r -, a 41 Y�
isce
d r < V r- l0
P. a y r L � rl
co.'Q1
r y<,< w.l J > w. '.
r n r r t' �' CL'
(--
r n "< °^scar V)
`t ..� .d L L)<re> L 7 > La
1� rr7>-- w < w •
,{ 3 T�^y r^ < , >c 4 v
• r <^^ >< < <' [: .rl •
w7 J, r,. 1"'
L
't /if,:eesf •w ,f .
,. , s
AI , , .,
.
.4-0. > / , A �
` TRAFFIC INCREASE CASE IVb OVER CASE Illb ``ti •
tiO
),Pr .
io , o ff.f PUBLIC. WORKS DEPARTMENT
� r z DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631
14'n u—li1 4 .? MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
co-
ORTED SEP1'.
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH September 15, 1980
MAYOR
Paul S. Chiado
Vice President and • •• '
District Manager .
The Austin Company
800 SW 16th St.
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Mr. Chiado:
In response to your letter dated September 9, 1980 it would be agree-
able to redefine the limits of the fill in accordance with the
attached print.
If I can be of any further assistance, please advise.
Very truly. ) s,
arren C. Gonnason, P.E.
Public Works Director
•
DGM:pmp .
Attachment
I
S.W. I6TH STREET
N 89'35125"E-448.59' 0
N89'35'251£-411.171 }'‘ �4
0
eo°
e
id ci
W ; 33�'s.
8
A32
-cu A z 90*Oi42"
a R s 243.8r
•
z o
z
I
I
I
- N 89'35133"E-261.13'
W I 51 1 8
`o-o I____ I---
.1 O o N 1 50 1 9
_ r -I
`o° Dz , 49 110
N 89'35'36"E-264.82'
1 BQ)C C .YEQ%
C.)
/1/oPo%v? ilETive-6- )_ SW/6 __5lI /_f L
N
1 M
1
830's _ 2921=
' o 500'I
N
S =
I
j
{I
iv
I
.1 20N
I h
ti
O
505'= 6331=
,i N 89'49.01"W-11313.55'
$ •
S.W. I9TH STREET
•
;i
OF i
`4, THE CITY OF RENTON
4i p
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
o ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9,0 235- 2550
O9�TFD SEPIEMO�P
June 20, 1980
Mr . Jake Fox
Austin Company
800-S .W. 16th Street
Renton , Washngton 98055
RE : ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION/SP-427-79
Dear Mr . Fox :
The Environmental Review Committee met today to review the
additional information submitted by the Austin Company to
consider the final environmental determination on the proposed
filling and grading request , SP-427-79 . It was their determination
that insufficient information was presented and that a detailed
environmental impact statement is necessary to acquire that
information . Specifically , that :
(1 ) The proposal does not consider the impacts upon the
100-year flood plain and the regional storm drainage
basin (East Side Green River Watershed Project ) ,
( 2) The filling of the area proposed will eliminate existing
wildlife habitat , and
(3) The scope of the development plans are inadequate to
determine the impacts upon municipal services .
A final declaration of significance will be published in
the newspaper on Wednesday , June 25th. The appeal period
of 14 days will end on July 9th. An appeal will have to
be submitted directlty to the City of Renton Hearing Examiner .
The City of Renton has established a procedure for writing
environmental impact statements . The City of Renton is the
focal point of the process . The applicant will provide the
City with three consultants capable of preparing the impact
statement . The City of Renton will then determine which
one of the three is acceptable . If none of the three are
acceptable to the City , the applicant should provide the
City with additional names until the City and the applicant
can reach concurrence . At that point , the applicant will
deposit with the City sufficient funds to cover the cost
of the impact statement . The consultant is paid directly
by the City with these funds set aside by the applicant .
Letter to Jake Fox
Page -2-
June .20, 1980
Pre-draft consultations shall involve the specific areas
to be concentrated upon . The City staff works very closely
with the consultant in developing the EIS. The consultant
will prepare a draft EIS and present it to the City for review.
The draft EIS will not be issued until the City determines
its adequacy. At' that point it undergoes a 30-day review .
Comments are received and responses are made for the final
EIS and after review of the responses by the consultant ,
the City will issue the final impact statement . Length of
time involved depends upon the ability of the consultant
to answer all of the questions in the areas of concern.
If you should have any further questions regarding this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact this department.
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y. Ericksen,
Planning Director
Q . v
Roger J. Blayloc ,
Associate Planner
RJB ;sh
•
•
' OF R4,
O OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY . RENTON,WASHINGTON
c.) F:%",
POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678
2 � ,$. �.. hooi
n LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
o r ��� June 10, 1980 I I
9.9 Eo SEPr-, .
-
TO: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director . fj
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney a %I
Re: . Austin Company; Special Permit Application
Dear Gordon:
•
In response to your Memo : of June 5, 1980, please be advised
that the Environmental Review Committee is responsible for
issuing the Final Declaration since the res onsibilities. have
been shifted to that Committee.
Lawrence J. Warren
LJW:nd
cc: Mayor
Council President
•
•
•
r ,
, Date circulated : •3V,z.,71gl Q Comments due : ‘ go
ENIVIRONMENTAL CIMECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - $ff - 7q
APPLICATION No (s ) . , , ) 4/ 7-79
PROPONENT : 1444_0 D17k1 CO/ftp ny
PROJECT TITLE : , -P�C/,47L Af{/,rlr t f/r•'6,J
Brief Description of Project : 111,,:e5i?(e ,/,<r®,,",*, c.%,.. p®Q 13
LOCATION : .</d't oT-s�/le J7 1pe e,/qtym to 1 ek.e. ste/
SITE AREA : .?D.gatry BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO_
11 ) Topographic changes :
12 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
'3) Water & water courses : t/
'4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life:
6) Noise :
17) Light & glare :
18 ) Land Use ; north: •
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
110 ) Risk of upset : ✓.
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip-ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14) Public services :_
15 ) Energy :
16 ) ' Utilities :
17 ) Human health : - t/
18 ) Aesthetics :-
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history:
COMMENTS :
•
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : (2k-i-/ Title :
Date : G� z
FORM: ERC-06 •
I
•
Date circulated : •��Z7�� Comments due : 6/7/0
rr
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - __f - �9
APPLICATION No (s) . % P 4//7-79
PROPONENT : �p ;h COmpet Y
PROJECT TITLE : S'P�y,ftGAxsxa- / r:6,,i.e
'Brief Description of Project : 7611/ge5/'7(e wlae�ioitr. of .4004O dl3
t
LOCATION : .5.4/) oilers '/f 17. Gtze.eca4lambod 4e, SGf/
SITE AREA : t.341gatry BUILDING AREA (gross)
(DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : •
---�
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
lil ) Topographic changes : �\
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4) Plant life :
'5 ) Animal life : X
6) Noise : X,
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north:
east :
south:
west :
Land use conflicts : fir)4.)
View obstruction : Gl'ptil4*-
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset : X
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) :
traffic impacts : •
• 14) Public services : X
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health:
18 ) Aesthetics : •
I19 ) Recreation : !`
I20), Archeology/history :
COMMENTS : •
Recommendation : DNSI - DOS More Information x
Reviewed by : �� Title:
Date : --3 6 -- �
FORM: ERC-06
f 1.
{Date circulated : ✓1.2041® _ Comments due : es/b/go
ENVIRONVIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SKEET
, ECF - $ll - ?Cr
APPLICATION No (s ) . SP_ 4/ 7-79
PROPONENT : 'r o f; i 6:1011pet y
PROJECT TITLE : SPF�''l4.L Adoo/T-4),....P/1
. (( r�,�•�2
i
'Brief Description of Project : ''//®t5/'T‘ io��j ox, 004Odi3
j
LOCATION : ..5.4!°`1't' ®�-�'/f J7 i ?Amen"7 e. s;2
SITE AREA : .3D.garwo BUILDING AREA (gross)
'DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : X
12 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X
3) Water & water courses : X(
4) Plant life : I(
5 ) Animal life : N(
,6) Noise : , X
7) Light & glare : x'
48 ) Land Use ; north :
- east :
south : •
'-
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
°9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
ill ) Population/Employment :. X
12 ) Number of Dwellings : X _
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) :
traffic impacts :
14) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health : x
118) Aesthetics : X
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history : X
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI_ x _ DOS More Information`
;Reviewed by : P. LVw► llWIC.r Title :1.4 A[C e1"et 47iit4 ,
Date : . 2
FORM: ERC-06
i .
Date circulated : Comments due :
ENVIREMIIMEMITAL CHECKLIST REVIEIW SHEET
ECF - rj// - 79
APPLICATION No (s ) . SP — 427 - 79
PROPONENT :
PROJECT TITLE : Spec, , T -�Dr Hi/ Sc aote_
Brief Description' of Project : 4.ri'4/ appv, 2,50 ODD elds
-Gill s� 11__
LOCATION : S Si�� o'T" Ste) /9 ' . wed' e Tartmet S14.)
SITE AREA : t 31�.• a- 44.- BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : ' V.
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses : V
4) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life : ✓
6) Noise : ✓
7) Light & glare : 1�
8 ) Land Use ; north : w"el s S�" /4ve J Pri k Creek
east : ` SW4 a
Kd //� / 1'
south : /I rti Spry:►�gbhook `lrm eg g i rtidwsih'e hold tin
west : e�' aglart,S f QQ
1 / dn�.
Land use conflicts : Ma Jo�- c vsKP i ei iuSi Eas+Side Wdershed l�i-o je4 c ' is
View obstruction : 1JaMQ. _
9) Natural resources : v
• 10 ) Risk of upset : ✓,
11 ) Population/Employment : ✓
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : f
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health : V
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation : ✓
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS : Al actor isS ctes 'Kat wa + be resolve R�lox .2 /ai- rep/ace-J*444-
o+ waiaKol kabif�f iw.pactto/ 6 Writ 4i'11 cen�li"c4s wi# reserv„1ias, O
riN tavook Creek cltchnit J rt. 4- '/'or S.C. S. Cast Sick pre;td
cbredb ►$e, (i.e. 04 of •A1! an Flood elew:kens cu,4 exiesif'of -Noed,ol ar).
IaKd M.se (,i.e. jadusfi-ial lot.14I/ Proposeds,v laKal ekvrr.►,. ze1,eof J.
Recommendation : DNSI_ DOS 1 More Information_
Reviewed by : �"_ /1, Aj ,,444- Title : 4*.a RetMNU'
Date : litaa 2'7 I98O
FORM: ERC-06
1
Date circulated : •5f,27A V Comments due : 6/7/0
f!
EINIVIIRONMIEMITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - .0 - 7q
APPLICATION No (s ) . 3 / 7-79
PROPONENT : l �tih;h COMP*. Y
PROJECT TITLE : s pact .L *4/0/r<4,- ;//1.'6,4 .
Brief Description of Project : /64//Qgf` o /,���j-aX, c . 00•rei3
LOCATION : $,.c,')t eT-S 'Ir 57. 1Ties7 e410ior41 %e. &'
SITE AREA : . .4ger.e.„0-0 BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ---'
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : V`
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life : / ,
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise : ' p//://:',
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north : .tegrpe-a� � IL%-•?..1Araa1- Ct`. drtt'.4.7 %AZ
J
east : rem.-4�A/��tL,uennY f rIthiistestias.A.,frei440/c
south : Tt"(lW✓ �+��t.��.-.WUSI1rt a l
r• l7ti s1.1t 1
w e s t : 4Few ;at CZ;"f xt ctCC Q 4c�r )
Land use conflicts : TD .tkCctoSi W({tinvctyvsl1 .44,....e ta��lr.t4rrl6.
View obstruction : /�/�
9) Natural resources : /
10 ) Risk of upset : ///
11 ) Population/Employment : /� f�
12 ) Number of Dwellings : !/
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : / Are Kj,..--/--
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics:
119 ) Recreation : v
20 ) Aery rcheology/history/:
11 C O M M E N T S : Q /fA'Ccf1SA,e td r vP Q dO,, de ,,,4/„,,,„, O f fit, Sit.'e�/(i
�" r p '. �J�•f*/.v(il ,..t//.w6r
t iCP I'Ic !l'trhr Pcosy X
jl¢ eely?ems o e7iiie 1�' ,S'J'7Jt-`n dyce'r�r �°iJr Dy�1te1M.'� f"�/�•�/s1rt�
i.n .c �6 ro / f /
(Recommendation : DNSI_IA DOS More Information,
(:Reviewed by :A( /M604.1k Title : 456c4.4./A04~7
Date : 67Z7/80
1 FORM: ERC-06 *S�lj�Qci C�Vj hs ', �;yeh'a/d` fep€541 ,t i' - •‘1-,
row r•.. 'rt-OrmeM 5 :elove,
Date circulated : .� zete, Comments due : 6/lgo
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - $// - 7q
APPLICATION No (s) . ,5P 4/7_79
PROPONENT : 1A lDftrl 69isipet,ty
PROJECT TITLE : ikf{&flr �rf '6Ale
; Brief Description of Project : /6411a5/' /�%,j0"fr. a CQQv4/3
LOCATION : < de Q--S/?//rA /, Ltt+.S�a74 Orl 4e. Ste
SITE AREA : ,Fagaciro BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses : _
4) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
16) Noise :
17 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north:
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health:
18) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20) Archeology/history : '
COMMENTS : '
Recommendation : DNS DOS More Information,
Reviewed by : �- �--
Date : 6 - 3
FORM: ERC-06
Planning
12-1979
•
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application : diff#1 6A MIT `5®'Vc27"7 Rif 417'ea
41,1_1012et "wig
. Q max. s® i®o e/3
Location :s'S,5 a el" � "toes f ive t,.Sal
Applicant: 2A #1 J5` 7 / e:B047vy
TO: 1,/arks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : /A®
Police Department A. R, C, MEETING DATE : lblpk,
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building 'Division
Utilities Engineering
Fire Department
(Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRIT. N FO' THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
0 AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF 0" R ' •ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T A TEND THE ARC,
PLEISE P:OV-. . E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON
•
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE
Approved xxx Approved with Conditions Not Approved
1) Request should not be approved until all the illegal fill that has been put
into the site without a permit is removed.
2) Paved or rock roadway be put 25.0. feet into the job site prior to fill oper-
ation to prevent tracking of dirt & mud onto .roadway.
3) Access to the site be off of Raymond Ave. S.W.
4) No truck traffic be allowed on Grady Way So. , between Lind S.W. & W. Valley
Hwy. , due to the heavy traffic volumes & bad roadway on that portion of Grad]
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Way
5) Roadway be kept clear of mud & dirt at "ALL" times.
G 1/, PART \
ved proved with Conditions Ap . 14"ot Ap oued
6) $25, 000 cash bond be posted with the city, and money to be used to keep
street clean if the contractor does not keep the city streets clean.
7) Traffic division and police dept. approve truck route, truck route signing
and hours of hauling prior to issuance of permit. As well.las having authoritl
to change the above as conditions warrant. ( ie. . Longacres Race traffic,
Boeing rush hour affic in area, etc. )
6/3/80
SignatureGof D rector or Authorized Representative Date
Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET .
Application : SWIM. Pe ArYtiar (Sr'y27"70 gu
e 1%,-"te-
rx. e2.54000 yd3
Location: • % q $f &S1
.1
Applicant: ��„% nj57®4/ CA tpA,ly
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 07/496
Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : ?I/A,
Public orks Department
_ Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building Division
Utilities Engineering •
Fire Department
(Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRIT N 014HE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
IF 0 R MENT/DIVISIONT REPRESENTATIVE TWILL HNOT ABLE RTCOATTENDCE THEO
OM
b ARC,
SE PLE P OV E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with Conditions v Not Approved
....� i�.,.�-.. .�- oo s S �(no,.-fit C%uc�G
c s
Nee-) ct
A
3> �x�`S ��h+111 / M
F c ,r/ e.,J / 1� aC00�(GLvT[0�'- f.0 Qo /t j 1 r yCL ke-gcV(rn enceedetve,
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : .
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
e
Application : C- P. a IA . 7.. . r • if
p,e� 3O. .4t c p d 3
Location : S.sijo ofSW /4f0fr51. , Sf yea,
Appl i cant: 17/E 41097/,/ Co"t4sovy
1 - .
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : $7//,Qo
Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE: 16/21,40
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Buil ing Division
ti Utilities Engineering •
Fire Department
(Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRIT N /FO THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AIF TT AR A®MENT/DIVISIONTREPRESENTATIVETHE WILLHIRD NOT ABLERTCOEp ATTENDCTHEOOM ARC,
LE'PSE P OV E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. -ON
1
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Apprioved I' Approved with Conditions Not Approved
/ h`WO/OA-4)7 . /D A-cz
/,u,s-m- Q A4//3 s l//CG`l9/cSLe /,P V d fi� Go ,%iJ /2u1'/
�'c�rt�S2i G7�J�v. 7 7 T-Co us- dacJ �i 7
A, ?/ ,
/-mod 4G
Signature of Director or Aut ,arized Representative Date
1
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : N'fia,TT•{
1 /
✓ Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
1
1
1
1 a
- („,„,.
• Signatu e' of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Planning
12-1979
RENTON PL
ANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application :__„S IAL . 40h IT (0).907"i - j'_'��` 1 r6
st.j.e.
.." i
OA YD. ZIP cuerS . ax. 0?S4 000 yd 3.
Location :Sizije of SW NOW AfieS fa? Jot 1/P.49I
Applicant: r1;97/ / CDmMNy
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 07/9/24
Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : 0
Public Works Department
ineering Division
1/2AV
Traffic Engineering
Building Division
Utilities Engineering
Fire Department
(Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRIT N FO THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
D AT 9: O A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF 0 R ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE IQ ATTEND THE ARC,
PLE SE P OV E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :0� P.M. ON
.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 111,AMc. GatG040 Saito/Ai ply.
,x Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved •
/� ---- 5 2►7-80
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : - .
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
•
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
DE"r' OPMENT APPLICATION REVIEF -BEET
Application : /,C. ® Alin ' rkg F,
i.V.Itaires)
Si- (Z7 9 Li/a/IA.0.0x. 2c4boo yd.-3
�
Location : ..5W4' �, ©r, ee / 7 Sr c },y 41 9,,4 ACA k , If OP. �rida,imt
Applicant : 6, te- 1p .
Parks Department TO :
p SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Police Department A. R. C. MEETING_Ar4/21/11______
Public Works Department
Engineering Division C;it /��
Traffic Engineering � RECFIIIEo 'o
/V 2
wilding Division JUI 31 1979
Utilities Engineering - ....., _
9 t4'
Fire Department -4/ ��,
NG_.DEP Pam.
IN1,�WRITING FORGTHETAP'LICATIONIREVIEW CONFERENCEOr(ARC)) TO BE H?LDIOND
,�i� TMi v AT 9 .00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE
RUI IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
ATTEND TH ON EC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BY / 4 �
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: � �,
Approved KApproved with conditions Not Approved
/*`Zi[s /.S Akuj J A/J7 -LLt 0. rD arzA i N aCoC
GOOx/c .6Lzf &)07- el-Z----. Ai .760/0- ----- 5 c,L‘---t7
�� oti /,o,.,vi. -D,A-7--Cy
Signature of rector or Authorized Representative,.0,0"1127
Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with conditions _ Not Approved
Signature of,Directoror Authorized Representative Date
DE%ID OPMENT APPLICATION REVIEF - BEET
Application / P I e `-0° + 6,4?WA 64 6 A 36.C 6 7 4 61,4e 07 co)
1k 112 t7. -19 Approx. 2so f Q y i. ?
Location : Wa :,,s61> qr L AA f'•SIVeividealei
Applicant : 11711004,7 41/5rewe.,,A40,44Afy
Parks Department
T0, p SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:'
Police Department A. R. C. MEETING AY/1179
----)
ublic. Works Department
Engineering Division
O F 14-
Traffic Engineering iiRECFIV�D �o'Z Building Division
OCT 31 197s
Utilities Engineering -----------
Fire Department 94, 4,
4/G DEP PRE+
COf�9\IENTTS OR S IGGEST Op�S REGARD I ��G T I I S A'P I CAT I0N SHOULD E PROVI DED
RITIP FOR THE AP LIGATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO PE HELD ON
®� AT 9a00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE
. F OUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
AATTTEND THEE ARRC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: '1� rQ - - �'
Approved ✓ Approved with conditions Not Approved
Se-1--, o- ---0-76s
. ' ,6----1( ./..----- /4/ /?:7
Signature of Director or Authorized Re'resenta iv Date
_
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: _ _._
Approved Approved with conditions Not Ap
proved •
, f
411,
r /f
r -,.
' 5-'d. S.
Glib/r/e,:d t�
a
Signatu e of Director or uthorize R resentative D to
Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application : SPECIAL PEQrstir (0.9c27.7 F 11 rGr•/e
2!leries . tit Approx. ago,000 ye/3
Location : __c5iJe ork.SW /Tt S1 df/eSfp"a "1.7rnere'/ tie.��i l
Appl i cant.: 17 40517/A/ 66m,1/44/
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED NEARING DATE : ROO_
Police Department A, R, C, MEETING DATE : l&fille_
Public Works Department
Engineering. Division
Traffic Engineering
1 Building Division
Utilities Engineering
Fire Department
(Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
N WRIT FFO THE APPLICATION W CONFERENCE ( TO BE HELD ON
IF 0 R FA TMENT/DIVISIONTREVIEREPRESENTATIVETWILLHNOT ABLER TOOATTENDCE THEO OM
DARC,
PLE S P OV ®HE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 02 6
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
C' c 3 d-iv
Signat a of Director or Authorized Representative Date
,
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : -
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Kenton Planning Department
DE' OPMENT APPLICATION REVIEt IEET
A lication : ar t PP ,s� L/�L pei mirtP �/ C1egeir s" Cr CS)
SP— y27-?9 1► iileprok.zsop000 - 3
Location : .51/✓cer..tor of .5w/Q ret ST .041Aye• lrx16.!•i
PP
A l i c a n t : /WO /f'U 57/4/ eodotp/4J1(Y /
Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Police Department A R C. MEETING /O /t/79
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
yof REN
Traffic Engineering J. .
fiCE111Eo
Building Division (3
Utilities Engineering OCT 31 197:'
Fire Department
/1/N�NG DE��
OtdP1EITIPOR. SUGGESTIONSIR GARDI ��G CI S APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
h P L CATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
',��I/� 7 AT 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE
RUUh� IF YOUR. DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
ATT NIL THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:UO PM ON
REVIEWING._,DEPA�R:TMENT/DIVISION:
)( Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
2
Signature of Director or Authorized R resentative ate
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
•
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final
declaration of non-significance for the following projects :
1 . SHANNON O 'NEIL (ECF-575-80) , application for site
approval for conversion of existing single family
residence to dental office use , File SA-054-80 ;
property located at 1702 Duvall Avenue N . E .
2 . GLACIER PARK COMPANY (ECF-576-80) , application
for preliminary plat to re-subdivide 8 .4 acres
of the Orillia Industrial Park - Phase I into two
lots , File No . PP-055-80 ; property located on the
east side of Lind Avenue S .W. between S .W. 29th
Street and S .W. 34th Street .
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC ) has also issued
a final declaration of significance for the following project :
3 . AUSTIN COMPANY (ECF-511-79) , application for special
permit for fill and grade of approximately 250 ,000
cubic yards on 30 . 8 acres , File No. SP-427-79 ;
property located south side of S.W. 19th Street
west of Raymond Avenue S .E .
Further information regarding this action is available in
the Planning Department , Municipal Building , Renton, Washington,
235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the
Hearing Examiner by July 9, 1980 .
Published : June 25, 1980
OF R4,11/
A.
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON,WASHINGTON
,V
Q, Z
POST OFFICE 80X 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILOING • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678
E.' LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
9Ao,9gT �� t June 10, 1980
ED SEC:11
TO: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director
,r
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney /
Re: Austin Company; Special Permit Application ;:.
•
Dear Gordon:
In response to your Memo of June 5 , 1980, please be advised
that the .Environmental Review Committee is responsible for
issuing the Final Declaration since the res onsibilities have
been shifted to that Committee.
Lawrence J. Warren
LJW:nd
cc: Mayor _
Council President
f j
a THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET
RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055
COMPANY TELEPHONE 206/226-8800
TELETYPE 910.423.0882
DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS
May 27, 198091 19%0
raw
Planning Department 4
CITY OF RENTON ��1NG�e � a,
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton , WA 98055 n � �
Subject : Renton File No . SP-427-79 rCG ' `)
Gentlemen :
Submitted herewith are the following items for your
consideration regarding our special permit application .
1. Development Plan for the 3-acre tract (8 Prints)
2. Revised set of proposed fill drawings showing
standard Renton on-site drainage facilities
(8 Sets)
3. Rendering of specific layout plan for the
northerly 12+ acres (Original and 16x20 photo)
4 . Perspective drawing for the northerly 12+ acres
(Original and 16. 20 photo)
The fill as proposed does not encroach on the existing
Springbrook Creek Channel nor the drainage channels from the
east; therefore , we request that you not require submittal
of a detailed analysis of the entire storm drainage basin .
Very truly yours, �1 /,_
c��,l 1t•,�p�.l C� =
THE AUSTIN COMPANY 0 CAegkl %St
Neu'. TN5 .
L. Fox 'Pk. os"J- Tee .
Civil Engineer
/jea
t.
THE AUSi]N 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET
RENTON.WASHINGTON 98055
r N Ltj AlCOMPANY NY TELEPHONE 206/226-8800
- ,v� �( TELETYPE 910.423.0882
DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS
April 11 , 1980
Mr . Warren C. Gonnason, Chairman
Board of Public Works
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Subject : Surety Bond, Deferral of On-Site
Improvements along S.W. 19th Street
Between Raymond Avenue S.W. and
Lind Avenue Southwest
Renton, Washington
The Austin Company Work Order No . 79-5208
Reference : City of Renton Letter dated
March 19, 1980, Same Subject
Dear Mr . Gonnason:
Please find enclosed subject Surety Bond as provided by Safeco
Insurance Company of America , dated April 8, 1980 under Bond No .
413500, active for one year .
Ver truly yours,
TH TIN CO A
6e.
a
D. Wesley utcher N•LQ/1/
Project/Coordinator
�•
DWB: ab' ��D
>- C•> 1�' 2
Attachment I . "0 " II
Jcc : \C: ///'
J. PoltzQQ.D. Hemstreet tvP . Chiado ANNMG
Mark A. Weed
R. G. Nelson
G . Y. Erickson
a31
SA CO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
AL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
ATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
SAFECO MERICA
HOME OFFICE:SAFECO PLAZA
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98185
Bond No. 413500t
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS,That we, THE AUSTIN COMPANY
as Principal, and the SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,a corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Washington,and authorized to transact the business of surety in the State of WASHINGTON
as Surety,are held and firmly hound unto CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
in the just and full sum
of SEVENTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY AND NO/100 Dollars($ 17,1820.00 ),
for which sum,well and truly to be paid,we bind ourselves,our heirs,executors,administrators,successors and assigns,
jointly and severally,firmly by these presents.
Sealed with our seals,and dated this 8th day of April ,19 80
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH,That,WHEREAS, THE AUSTIN COMPANY as Principal has
applied to the BOARD 0! PUBLIC WORKS. CITY OF RENTON for deferral for one year of
on-site improvements (landscaping) as approved by the planning Department, City of
Renton along SW 19th street between Raymond Avenue S.W. and Lind Avenue S.W.; and
WHEREAS, the BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF RENTON, as a condition precedent to
rg_anting a one year-deferral requires that said Principal furnish a surety bond
guaranteeing installation of said off-site improvements (landscaping).
NOW. THEREFORE, If the said principal, THE AUSTIN COMPANY shall install such off-
site improvements (landscaping) as approved by the planning Department, City of
Renton along SW 19th Street between Raymond._.Avenue S.Y. and _Lind Avenue S.W. at the
expiration of the deferral granted by the Board of Public Works
then this obligation to be void;otherwise,to remain in full force and effect.
THE AUSTIN COMPANY (Seal)
Principal
(Seal)
Paul S. hiado Principal
Vice-President
(Seal)
Principal
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
By •
Nlldrad 16 snllivan Attorney-in-Fact
PRINTED IN U.S.A.
5-1227 R1 11/75
13239 N. E, 100th
Kirkland, Wa.98033
November 29, 1979
Charles J. Delaurente, Mayor
Barbara Y. Simpoch, Mayor Elect
Gordon Erickson
Members of Council
Dear people:
We are very concerned about the rapid rate of filling that is occuring in the
Renton marsh areas south of Highway 405. We were under the impression that this
was going to take place over a long period of time and in conjunction with a
drainage program coordinated by the S.C.S. and King County.
There is a marsh and pond just south and the other east of the Austin buildings
occupied by The Boeing Company.
Both of these areas are heavily used by wildlife, "including fish, ducks, hawks, rails,
herons and songbirds. They also operate as natural water recharge areas and help
eliminate flooding problems in the valley. If the city of Renton could incorporate
these as natural areas into the development and drainage plans for this industrial
park, it could prove to be a model for similar type developments. These marshes
are rapidly disappearing the once filled in,can never be recovered.
•
We urge you to consider this proposal and stop the current rate of drainage that
is taking place in this tract south of the Austin site. A ditch has been dug
along the south border next to the tank farm and is rapidly draining this marsh.
If there is some way we can be of assistance, please let us know.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
/re-tr)-1-27-1-9/
Leonard Steiner, President . •
East Lake Washington Audubon Society
LS:sf
,/ "
•
Jj
'- 1,
...._. - ---------- r j�
j,
OF R4,
A.
,6 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
U `� © Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055
0 �' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9,0 cp• 235- 2550
94, „t0
SEPI
October 24, 1979
The Austin Company
800 S .W. 16th Street
Renton, Washington 98055
Attention : Jake Fox
Gentlemen:
Please find enclosed a proposed declaration of signi-
ficance for the Van Worden fill site, file number
SP-427-79. The project has been determined to be of
significant impact . There are many questions concern-
ing the actual filling and development of the site.
They are clearly listed on the proposed declaration
of significance. Until further notice, the application
for fill and grade has been suspended pending the com-
pletion of an environmental impact statement.
Very truly yours,
Gordon Y. Ericksen
Planning Director(V1-D-je19
Roger J. Blaylock
Associate Planner
RJB :wr
Enclosure
OF RA,
THE CITY OF RENTON
®® T,41, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
" � 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI D MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT
090 - -
- 235- 2550
AO�1FD SEP� vp#
T
October 1, 1979
TO: Ron Nelson, Building Division Supervisor
FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
By : David R. Clemens , Senior Planner
RE : FILL ACTIVITY SOUTHWEST OF BOEING VALLEY DEVELOPI ANT
The subject site was inspected this morning by Planning Department
staff. This inspection revealed that the entire area east of
Springbrook Creek (approximately 11 acres) has already been filled
to a depth of several feet (see attached. map for location) . Fill
material extends from the east property line westward to the top
of the slope of the banks of Springbrook Creek.
No special permit for filling and grading has been approved for
this site. Application for a special permit to fill a 30 acre
site - which includes the site in question and additional acreage
west of Springbrook Creek - was filed with the Planning Department
on September 27, 1979 , Fill activity was apparently in progress
at the site prior to this date. Review of this application,
including environmental analysis, is not complete.
Since fill activity was observed on the site Saturday, September
29, 1979 , and grading activity was in progress at the time of
today' s inspection, it appears that work continues on the site in
violation of appropriate . ordinances.
All appropriate measures to insure cessation of the fill operation
should be taken, and the applicant should be instructed to contact
the Planning Department to identify remedial measures which can be
taken to mitigate existing environmental impacts.
GW:DRC:wr
Attachment
cc: Mayor
Public Works Director
PROPOSED/ g ICLARATION OF SIGNIFICAN. ,"i i, .,,Atm r10,4-10
4 .
Application No . SP-427-79 1111 PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental- Checklist No . 511-79 IS FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Filling and grading of approximately 30,8 acres.
Proponent THE AUSTIN COMPANY
S.W. 19th Street between Raymond Avenue and Longacres
Location of Proposal Racetrack on the west side of the street,
Lead Agency CITY OF RFNTON PI ANNING DFPARTMFNT
This proposal has been determined to have ® not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EI'S 14• is
is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was
made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance :
1. The proposed fill area includes land encompassed by the East Side Green
River Watershed Project.
2. Fill area abutts the existing Springbrook Creek and as presently proposed
would have significant impact on water quality and existing drainae sy tems.
3. Filling of area proposed would eliminate existing wildlife habitat.
4. The proposed use of fill area or development plans have been presented to date.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/ W)
declaration of non-significance :
1, Submittal of specific development plans for future use of property in order
to evaluate impact.
2. Specification of measures to mitigate the probable impacts would need to he
evaluated through a detailed ana ysis including storm drainage on site and
for the entire storm drainage basin.,
Responsible Off i ci,. 1 Gordon Y. Ericksen
Ti tie Py'iny 'edor / i a to October 10, 1979
}
Signature ;,; �- �` . 0. ' '. x. '`- . w.
or
° City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76 p
U
O
i
IfS ......
I r
HI_
, •
' - _
. _ I
GCESS.FHEE`aAY_INSE033YATEf1240S_'-- •— - � -
.�.�. woLvaG ,.�,
I \1 I MUM" , \.,.. i t.._......,,,)//0".....4.r.-7."-\\ //".' - 7
.. .._ -_9ML 1010a ST._ _ _ .... I
I '
1 •I Pullin r-----..---ls! . ----t............
ry Ilk"-.' ..... ...--1
\ /r e i
•
% C.C1-0.104•TIvIl I .• E I \I , -- - 3 a 5
LvoelP w , �DX cuL defer ,
v o o I .•gyp ,• � ._,� _
0 0 0 p u $ ` o n
o CP Gi \ _ z ; TACT o ° - ,;
O 0 O ��� wewnwrt•r COtlKwpi� O - a •l _ �1 , , . , l'ER,24" p
O O O •.�r wen eow.w. Z I u,�. W - 't -
\ •a't
: C/564W,V5 L '
a j,— — — -- SW 19Ih sr 0j
•
I1
,. . . ,
01t. 1
EXHIBITf B
J
. i w �-- ' SITE PLAN 1�.
1 1
• 4Q PLATE:, 1
a,
•
..•
1 �
L- %.: ..
'- �� Cl THE AUSTIN
-- (,".r -- - -- i` COMPANY
�...�
DRIBIONINO•■NOI •■UILDIN•
' e4' •-~1.1.,. '' "V'''..tlf4.47-fta-jci,...'.79i':.', V.1w---'-'.. ., .„,,,...A.„.i':'-fliL 4r^,7:....„',..,par.4 fr''';2-4-=4:3Z,`,. gsraiTtl...4174P.f: -Z*15114;j'a...,.”° :/t--77:•;-;6:0).
, P-4''''''L•';';'42..F.:;: :477:41iiiak :ZZ'.''''.44-,Ti;.- .*,i:• .-11.21'): -4Z'Alt • +1'''''''.4:71""•U*4.1.,,,,\t'''Y'%'',:*,.:':-.".fi7.0' PA.`,•.',;:''t 4-lir NE,!,,-,:r.ktt,,, k4rif4 VV:1".Ar' '"--,--Att'-r: •,,• - , ,.47.-' ,, .*14 4 ,-- ..... - -*-4i,_=L,-,..;..,t&,r:„_;-7.,_, .. . ,,......,_7. ...,,,,,,,,w1„„..,, ti,4..v.„.4.„..,...z..,.„,„74, .:„._ ...t,i.:„.. .31,1v.,.., ._,....„..- x.,, ,,,..........,,,... :.,,....„.•,:_::.t.,...‘:_se.:i ....,,,, ,,,i.:„....„.„,,,,v,,.4„,„.,,,_,,,,,.. -4,....._4„;..,2t,<I-0.-;0.,.4
•• .iir. _, • .. ,„,,.._
„ ,••,;-,.;•--;,-, ..• ----.4„....,, .•;,,,•-• •••-e._,,,,,-,* re,.•-F.•-k-s-,,,. ;,,,,,..,-.--- ist4i.e.-. p,,-.41- ,!.:.=.%,..,..,•,-...2„7;,:*,,,,,y,,,-,.. ..,Si-;:,-;:i,,V,„.-.,,,-,43-‘4,-..‘.k.:
. 41.4: wgr.,".-.. kii. 4.7,,,, .11 4,;(.. ,.... .-: 7-31;14),1"1Cr4017'zs... '...fii-..#441.trit.4,..1,44 ..,i.. .."-444.1. 4•,-- lt-,r'.. ...-• -.4,'*441'W$-- ---"s'1.t.:, 1:7".:rzeIV-f-4 k.,:,--:i"--_,:-",si....,1.- :Ff.,:---c-v.N.),..,3;::: ,..,...,..._;.3,.... -..., ,;:,,,,,,,.,,,.4.,.i..;, .1
-4 ' - ''- -•- _,Aii,:`'''' :. , : :1., 0,1*194-7±71:?,,At.,24,,,ifir;...-,t's,-,>,;,-..At..t;,,,, . . ,sizqiili kfi'-','-: -..iv,',:,':::=';,-:,v,.,-.-C';'_.7:-.;:e 'jf(r '''''.:.'i.:44,-,-.4,,p„«,-.A.,._::4,7i4.11:''.,, ''',4t,'74-a4.:4- 1r.4„iit...--,.,
:,-; 4 tf. i Lpi.°: z,z,i,-,,..i..5-_,4.,, v•k, ...r-Y.. ..esr-1;i4,..-.4.s,i,-;•- ,y.s?!1* V.."`g s .-!- -..,:.4,f4,:i,'.1,x44,-s .ts„..--- I,S,) -,..,-F,,ir..-.--hf.isr.- le._,,,-0-..
'''‘'t7; :lks. -,ff--4-:,.;.'- -,;-,,L'?h*-0.47i-71'i,14,-'-':''',.4Wail,(21' -.''''.....:."-iii,-r*fifts.';'4r-ii.V ., '4ii":4, *-44,,,A.2.-Z-:4:Cet,',..t5 ,--"Y' r•L-r.a.t.,:_: i1-7-k"-,-,;1•-•z.41•••.;i4,3•4•ivi„„ ,--ill, ,,,,g,-7.,:,,--4,?-t•i-i
i .-1.-.., ii,34-,A. L . -...'•• .',. -„. - -,---1,-gt?,,,,s....*-...•••• -...--z--.0ille-,,,i,,,,,f-,,.„:•*.i.*„-,w - . - •....-.tiAt- : :-..--_.-,'-'• ',,,-,;.%,,, vi•-„6:1,4.1,,-;415.-:••••••01••,;(,,i):•1.);;,r;,!,,,v'. kcig',.-f-t,czeit,-1,11-pt.,..,.-1,*•!•7,- '- <•1 ..1,-,-,7„.„.:-A14,
,T, . •,,,:• 1 lc _ • . ;.*,,fft.•;_-••:,P...1„..,,avq„A,§).•qt,.,,,,,,•044.:e.0,,,,,,;..,4••,v,,,AA:,,, . ; ,,..,4.,0--. -. ...--....,, 21.,,,;,„411..„„_-:,v4.,.-,,..,,,i,),i,,,,.,.-i4, ;,3i:e:-..., ,-;,:„. rx,,,,,..a.,..,- ;,?4,e;),,,F1.0-4_—.te...:,,,,:, . „ .,_ ,4,4,•rc.-.,v ,i,
4
) - i; :, ildit FT :'141,40,0,0,...'r"4'•;:i*Ii.vx -'':,i1X-lgu,..J.I.::",k,:,,,,,,r0,...„.4 --,-•_1,: f.....,1-..h.i.1.;-Z. wyr-;.•,?-.4i‘krh,:. ',...,.!,2-':4,,,.,,,.%-,7,..,I:,T...-A-td'i:) ,..,,,.,,i- ftL,1,,'..f-,g-:,..,..;.-,. ..;ir.,,, ..,•,A;,..t .i#.3".q-, -,t4e04,-;i:N,
,41,„&....L....._5.v;,„,..poaiu%-.-.4-.T.,:iii.q,..,,,,,fg•-t,,,......-„,....-:;.:4„sc.,;,,..-.41,•4-_,:;.,..-, ,,, . ',...i t,i-,...,a.i....0,,,,,Jk.e/..., .‘.,,_._,p,w5.,_;:•:„4,4;:15 ,•„:,.•••f5-4..„.i,1„-. t,..,:_i_-1,-:--1,4*-.41%.s... -_,,,,,zw.-isizi.; •„•...—.-.?,=.&.,,,t,.. ,.3,.
.,..., 17,:s.,,,,t41.,„:„....iv..:.„,-,..-.,,??y,r...,_: .i.:(1•,.,,,A...1:i.;.,,,,p,-,......,,,,,,,,,:wil - - 5,.• • • - tlfif.,,,,u 14-1.',,i,:p$'4.4;;;;?•‘..41":'-',,,,,,,:-.;.--','Y'..*-4•14-- .r .,,ii'sai4Mi: ) --`,%::-.1-',44.Kt-•,taittl,kiii .-&-a- .1,,Tx;
.._.;,-7, f, , •,,,,, ;,... A, ,,a,:-',•-.3. ." 432k,..ii-..4%.1 -,'',';,-.3.),,, ,,,•11,.:. i•2,1','i'..r.,;\--,..1,,-,,",-,q,,'-;•,1''''k-'. .-''' veS2•3_.:. Otti.....--1.7-A2'"- -,' .."" .: .,_...'•..--- "ar., ,,.'....kl....,1?-12,-4,- ..f.1.,.;
, .., , ..- ••,:4 *". 7',:' --,p,k-,, ,a,_';''' ',..,-- S711,.,e,..:3::citr,t,zic,-r2;41.,..c...4,4„..."'9^..N",*-.}..,_,,ker,'44,1'alaa.' 44;..A.t., la":"-----."t" -•-•--,...:,....:..::-.., . -'4,•-..
1--••,,,, '.....,•-•••.4.*%.- -
--F, .;-'7„.7-71k•,,,, --„. :"'-'7,r1`7-':;.„Fit3P.A,17YOrf,-.•*!";•17'''.V,
z• -,--r-e-,;.--A*xoz...!...---- '
r••••- - . . Ar,', ,ri,75.7-as,-;7!-C.11:- -11,or:•1!,••••...., --‘1,-TFy....• . 14, c.-..,-F.-7-'3,73,,--•..:1":74,41..rai71..!-a?‹.0,569r,le,-.'-'•:+''''''''''"'''':';,.
-7-• ik.,•••:,' -, _,--.-.7-•••,-------',"zqc--,...„7.-ir-V.;-; 2 ,1a,';' • ,.. ,-,
_..I.I.ail',4.`"1.i...&04....i'Sidi, Cl'e.L'f'11_ • : ...-q V4.4f;!;''';‘,•4: 7'T!''':'r;42•.70:,',Plir''ilf.')11:1 ol'Is-A Picar.f..:.IliktiV,..- 2.k..4j!-'"''.31.417-'""7C""',
45'...%_. ..,,,-.7,kr,,--r.•.•,-1,-.1,Nsi .r L.,p.r..- ..i i'•rt,,t,",'..-,,, ',,a....t
- .C1 - '''.777"'‹,,•i
'''''$`1411. • :;''' '',W 1, ''' ' .. .,'1' d'e.,,./ %101......75,7,7,c4-1`,:-'4;1:1°K.A.7-. q''c''!;'V:cie.....e.:7-1_4:WkW4stig'N{4',$.;:W.-='-A;NA\,,,'S-1,•."' •-1. -..'-'7.,'N......','-'7'''''4'd 'Va.. „AI+ 4L -
,grwr.
,
,,, .
0.4i*V.-,;'i. ' *It 4,..--.e.".:-''.. I: •'•• 0,,,,,,.„.,.;,• ,. 4,,,,vr,,,,,.,,,,,7,--c--,A,-, ,..,e. 4,;!-,J. i. ,,,`,:-.7..„--,....,,i•.'cir-sszrsp' -•,,,,,-,2,-..1,A- 47 ..,--1'), -5; '-,:''is'S''''Arl' .. .-..44-- ,- 4$
t.-.,.'C '1 I.• .'4,1'‘.%`,1'N';•:. ,4,4". -;..'4$•.•it'41.13..Z.;i ‘.14-4,...4..',41'.A.,Cii 1-1?;•1'14,'.1." .4.frksi-•c*,,, , ,..."-'41rs.-,i'.:... %•1- .-atiV-4-P-?, .‘ ...-t.-,'-t ' ,e I-.' I -e_ti 1 ' ri..:- i„- ....,=••f
mug •' ' , .,.4.-.... .••, ,i• •,0 gs.',',-„,7,1,;i:',,:f,i_aii-417,.-404,1 .w,•0:5,7,...4,"1,•„z1,,.„41,,,_,iF,04.Tvk•-r*ti. -.x„1:1,4viv A-ei‘a.,-3q:„..,.-.6'.0•C,',2,-V•-‘i-,{7 ..f•4,..0•.;,-;•-.1.-:',,FTJ,...4'F, -- ,-.v.,: •,- .•
,. v .. L• . • • f'.,- .....c,i ' •-r-:, • ic,-..,....*,. -'t.', -,' ' ,.." P. . r.--,,,,,, -- ----,-...".,r,..,.,...----,.- --: -1,94;.:-.. • ,-,..: ....- • s'."---.:_''i 11 5.
1 "A 0. . ):;-7 ,-V1..-;,,YP'4',..,ze-s%...u..--,4,0 -;',,,."4',..A-...-b%xr- iNilip. *T1,.--i.le..q•••:4-•••:-A-44- .•-,•:.%.0•.,,,A-c,teit--'1,-s;-,4v,„,.„:•'0- -.4%•,,4 •,,, . • ,..:,....- 6 .---,-- ' •"I'' ''''Iii— i
,..i,' • . 4.- $ ''.^. . ,14. -Vt-7;:;111.73.izz-;, ' ..".,, t%,1 ".. RZID • y_.,.1-1<-:' ''4`4 AA-. .
. ,.•
. On . VN5-,tv4-•;: .•-'17t4-'11:1 7-, .41-,,-igw.1";•4z41.,r,'‘ii':'!zV-i'..••:-Pli: 1-..,,•'11,-4-•,-4•: .-",u-it,,,9,-;g--;$;.•-,•'*,..i'V'e -- •!,----,.-• -- -""-
, I'-:,•;••• ,
.._
-k.._''k -;,„*--,••
< .• . .
1,.., -• , ,--, 4 ' ...--• . , „.. 4,4'. 00atitr2.1)*Q ' i‘,:?;:f;',434 -el?"45:4sz.IM,0?i,ejle,,0"i2:cr,44;,iii.:A;'1Z:41,,k4I,,,trAllAtte",..1,..-3-0.4 Vi
1,":,,.: .-• ., . 4 rii,C,..0".i „I',/-t4i .11 .,-,,--4:,,Alie.4.1-,5;6-4 141:1-44- '•-„,',,,144iltat;V:4:1-**,.117:'-" '-,4*,1Y-`,k.v.11?e"'r;r-iP:..;,1*-?-4*,„*I-44ek-kt4,1.‘ '','"3,:ai `• .° 47 . , -.- : .1
,.•; r 1 •-• /4 ",• '4-;,,,,,,.•-,_r„,..;,,,444,..,',,,..1, 4,,' nitt,,,, A r„,„,.., t,- 1.,„„ve,,14,i.,_-_,I,:a4,,•,a?,7,5•44,,,:,.,,v.,,,,,,it.r;.,:lr,gg:;;11,-;-. - -."-- -,:ikitV'.-1";,.v.-q-a-k?,,rt--'144 ''''''.1.--42, i ta a
i • •
', v1._ • •:.
A+1,"7 ..• 4• • • ,,,,,to-,.-afikA" --iit.-Akiike,17).-44:-giveR v.,,,,,,.. 0„--.f.;.k,n7•01?,,,Aviilit,,•;,,,,,,*0-.;,..ciwq :P .;:i.i,,,•:-,---'
- -z-zits,-,,,rksile, :. -.v....;•-•-•i,,,i,.•.1,--.,x-,,ei:E.,-; •,..ev-,;:.;A•R.-;lisy-...rifp.,7,,,,,,e,v,,ttl,„,„. .A,bp,,..,,,,-\A,=.6-,:,..,-,•-,,,.-„,:::,--.4A ••i
. -
", r re*.rt ..7 r AiPA:r,,,,;t?4,,A,C; l',7,4• 7.4-.„.„,,, . 1 40- •9,_ ,,, a j si 1 '.
r-wlit•ii.L.,?-;'-:•-ii.".:'‘A--E4.1t4'7-F,A,541*,, ,..,!..-1, 74.,,kill.'''?,',,vr,'44.. 0-1AV,,t7::'.7,2'-k•N',.-4!_,,kg,,*4•,.` • ".... '
. A'41.,.‘"Zafl.":it. 14'''' ,k*fq:SAV''W"..,:VJAV"' ..VS-34:r.V*',Fitaripri-F "1-",-g•%-iVr4,*%'4,7„...:,,Z.Pyif,A.k7.,T,...A., r4,,k3,2.t.•
i ,4 Fll _ . .....,:...,,,-..; -..:,17,,,, .,,,,;,,:,'••••;1,..,5!..i•-•:!!:.4,;:,,i':.,,,4.,_ 49. vut iprkit-..M,Irikt,•Cplx.,1-12... _04,1"tifk5-4;1 . 7,,,-i.W.:.-vm,i,13,-nAl.,.v,_?A'.1.:, ..'.,..,!,•,/,ti-. -Ii., •';,17- c,,...........\ vs-r., •14(6.4*-1
,A.,„Jrskyt: IQ, 1,..x,,.,„4,!4-7.a .,:va•41...n.N•1.?i-...7.i,'.!-2-,..j;rt,,,,-,,ii•;;&..cA: 11.•''.14, :;•:.c.-4.,0“4:if-t,g'..4",g4- -'ETv4.4 .,
.,..,..'!"t1-4;•,t#,••
•- dt,'.31;, ....:,,..„.,, .." ‘:-.7r?;441,4:;',.e..441 --t-z-Lcwi,..:*,,,-0.14- 07,,\,,t,-.,,W101:,,,r,,i,,, ,,,,,,,;.1•_;.,%,,,, ,:-,U..1.,4,-Pk: . S',.:'„,,''' tcr r..._ -ee.,,,... o .„... ,:74,r,!.7,-,;,
i .' .., •M.4- -'''''' '''' •11V •,/411;':flik'' ...: ''!..-g_'1!'•,:'.1• . • '-al•A-. • ,gisre... u„..„,.,433,„,_:,4.v,I„:2,.4,,,f,c,or.!..,, v,..,..•Azi_ , ,t1,11.**"4,-v-leiosve44-;0104.,:ro. :_,, c, IA. — .
,g i 0 it.,M 1 ..,'•.; , e,,,.4, '-' ' C.,'41'0 ti ',. - a414,,,I.,'°,'''''4'„il it* .• ''.:', .11..''7,,,Ota.,EVNY444't"-4.,,i '-,.1f,?.*P' '54.402iNt40**'.44aAt'Ac 4'. ''' . "*4**.., ........_*"" '-' .!igAltel;
, •.•;_, , ..1,„.•.,",,,i0e--• 1 • -,,,,,,,,,. •-,,,• .,•,--,,,, •,,,,,,I... -, -,f„,. f,....v '., .•,,,,,s•• 4.-•' s,•f-.,vt.v•'--•.•qa,;..,•,,:;„-',/.,,...-..,&;•',,li:--•:•,.:?4L,,:•.,-r„.,,„:''''.4tgt,:i3O-e„'_A-gq,.'2:1•„r,c,t-r,lffi,,,.:;:t,y,sav,.•,l.. •",''i• 3,,, IN -... :1.1***.V 4:''ti
'0 setr.1„,--.-' --.1'-. _. ir- ri, '--- -: `b• 4 4 ,,'i.'s,,-,4,4,A,- -4W4,..'itt,r,fi.,Wif;A°.44=',-gi'.‹.i7.i-,k -./1-iritrt'47:154-ikr‘4,-'.--Vzicie4V.44174-14:'`, A:- -,. 1.3 4:v
. 5 .-,:4,1',P4'"."••C-7.
ii.. , ..4g,:6. !;.:,'.."? ,.';'Z • ' ''..-' .‘ ''4'W•41•''',,,Aajl''''91::v17.0e .••'4.-**714.3411,4**°•••• •kt,46V.,;11..t-;;•-ifil.1...lrk„1-4..fg!Atk--k:4';',." kii4:30.1v ;U:1,-;„, 4 -,...„..... .41.:- ...,.i„.,,„.-oi,,.-zi.,:y,,1;,„',,;,•, ,,ipA*,f,T.f.-v,.5:.,..:*-gyi,o4,t.,:o4..ry:;-•Nza, : •,,-,--,,%.z,-.-.,c.,it,,,,;I.3,;.,nrsftt=;,•:• cnN- 0- 7-4,1- . iv
• - ,.. , ,
-.---. -,Tti.t,ar;--r--rx5Niwi- --- -,A.--A,Azir.,. .ry,-`-'1AtfE,4 i.lf,,:f-r:CP•- .-.,51,4.-f-V.F47.k*V.-.,4'.tf.-''.4''A'-t,,q;' - ‹...4... . '.-,I.,' 4.40
' -- - ..7 .*:/-'' -r-f- -4'4,P C• 4- • 14.11,14,Vei,,,,e,„1 iS.,4:Z6N`f ,41.1-,k'Vski;--7.-W-t.tlit1/4AS-47tit-041,t":141•:KV14'.e'*A-a*e':':':';.441;'.grJq-"Zt','Iss.-',,.gtit...4",:t.-- co 0 rEgrw,4.....--,,w-r=tr4"----
s: . i F.: " ...: w:'-‘, .•••=," or tvg,,e5,-.rtsv>!t,i',.01--W!;,4,-..."-0 • '..,.-.•s..!f•.i...n.34,,..-,t7,-:. . --,,..1-,,1.;.:-!-;., -:.,,•.,T.,;,_,-;•,..,• ,,‘,..„-„,,,,,;(..;,•:. ..si--,;:-,,,,...;;`,:,..:.,J:4,-..',',r.,-5- : we -17
fitra...* ,,- 1.- • - 'ut' '-
•,....,. -1. ,..., -t.----4,.;',Si.,' Vii.„%-i.'4,1-t.,, :.',k„;:•'",`•-•-.4r T.'474,-t.':.*,:'-`--,15:1.;- -'°i:•:: :-'. '-': ,;:..,4;... ',.„,i.1,0, a qo v.
• 1_,:....:= , . .., ..„4 • b&I',"IX.,,Teg:Fi"Wr.5,1%;;;'44..li"-', -*:.',.^1'i '''.;,-.i-,i, :',1702•.,.4-0 7,Z.1'44.,-',t,' '-0?-44,4,',1'.1, ..,-A -.,..,.5,4, *''',V-r•-4wl,l'Sr••' to.--7-
.... f ' ".?•`-'14<f-i'4VP-',14111-.-`-ta. -*,,,';' •'.:-. ,..Inf..'ff„i.--n"..;,.q,.:,`.:',°44:-Iilvi'-;';‘,'.iiii• '.';A'''' ';',0-1::'•'.'=;-,. .:-.-n,-.• , _'.,•14%' .°`:;1- =',V.---'' 0 4 d
:,.
•,..-i'V-3 ,-..7- ./4--at--,-/„'-..-•IA-. •--,-f--,,„4,:.• ,4'A, ..1• ••1' -•-"I'l• ' , '":4 tr4..., ,i--,ia,,---",',-;,44-;-1-4,-.- i,141..--2.t. -,,!;i1V_;.' I-
E` I, -,4,-:_,6-rs••::z.z.,_4..,,,, ,,,,,t'l-1.1.!,sr--,. ,-4:, ".",--4F,-:'-'4",:%-.'-'.:,?..,.,,, '.14.,-,:,,- r'',-.. 4h-,.,... ,'•4.-..,..,-.,A...‘7,m.,.r., ,.. ,-,-,:s.,-----,-,---•.7.---'ir,'
1,....i , •• , 1 ';;;:,I AT:. i 'L
.'.•!.q.:1 . I I ) ' -"Ar..474*.•,ri.N''''!"i:.*4''....rA • • .... ..- 4-4----- ''-'T.A"%1,- '-.t7'f'-",...."=7,:-,27--,'''''''r,',.:'..§'5.'' '-'4".. '',.''....0.''2,- '''''fil'.%.Ve';IN..":.--•• • •:,,". CI-
' ' t'‘''-' --7'f„,• 4,3„carY-"To'' • • I. qq•- ''''"*L74.• tOrP,.1-'''''. ,-,:tV, r .,,.'-' - ' '-,,S.,,?•• •..,:-,,,, -,4..4- 't-i,v-.. ,',, -t- .4 --is
11 ). 4-,ic:, .-.....-,--1417,„,•‘,..., ••••,:rt. ••-:•••-5,4", f-A•••••,•••• • „ '-,--.1-•...-.--4••*,.,-,-7-....v.•,.\• ,i2,--,-;,•},,.....••!• ' - 4:-- -,..it,,,,-;...,•3,,,---.-t-,-;:•,-
ill,\Yr•-,,•%; •••••,-,.1,...,1: ...••• 4e."-2.,.,..-r,.-.$,,o.c ' -,-5.-.0- -- ''"p'r..-7' '--",— -.-..". ....5"t••,'' 4%,,t.s.r,K,,' 4,7.",,:‘,1.,...g4.0-,4:k..4;.,,,‘.1:.?.;,„,k fiJ CI)
I.
.t . .. '..A.A.".,,.•:.'".41...04,,,,5"74"- ..-r;.,'fi.....'“: •.' " -A 1,.,„,"•,,,W,-,71.,..,.." ' P.A.,,i',A-1........, .""',-,' 1 , 1 • r-''''". '' .--.=••••'r ,e'-'••-=-4)•• i'r1.--,' -.."‘14.4A c,...p,r, -,,,„ , ceq.m.1.,,. la..."7:t,,,...sli,k!4, :-:, 4,,,,,,,,.3„.L;,..,,,....,.,,,,,w, ...,0- -1.
- --.,,,,,,„ .4.-4ktxt,,,p4„1,:;... 1-45istl'"P•,, ', =•?;‘,,,sfeaPj,"-killj?:',!:n'ti:A - '1-:,z4-''''*Vii.'.-,k'''IAR .1.4.0-1'‘kal;',7;=':Pt,'"i3..*.i'0.1' .........
‘'.-s't it - .-„,-. .• i. ''''
, , , i ,'''f's'""'.41.'-'1A .1./.,.1"../. ,,,, r4,N.. • . '0-.' ‘‘-4 r-,,,I.,,•f"-,-,----41,-,s, :. -..1:-.,,,„t,,N,,,a 1,,,, .**,:-.t.g-L!z.-,_.zr. F.,,, 's.2. ,t.!"
Pi'"'., I .1/4"*.!:- "..',',&..., ''''''' • . ..'''Z'; il'i'tri 7:1f AA7?24.,',!..':,..1",!';'31/.AMC,,g''',,,IN-gkyaW,,,..;",•.,'`14:d'::71,. ,le,. .,' '''• ''.i t' ' '"''''' __?..." " '1 .-kz...--•...,..,-;,- ••,•z-t• 72-
•;.<4 ''s, •W_.,-.*.r.'-_, , 1 • . .. . • •ip?.... ..14.13y-9:,-14-,,axk:.‘takv-..47,,z.. F.,,,,„,..:".47.4, , „‘„,,,...al.., -"Pr':',-_---tri•---44 ---7•• '1•• -c2-A-•'• „ale....u.•"%,",A--,1„,ti-,•"2,,tp,"41‹ --v.-%,--.--I- .....- _,
:•5 - '-1.1••,,,,-...4. , :,•-,•-..",i,..--1-4...4•--,..,,2fs F.,. -1.k--'••• - i•s••-•:--,4--.1-_, •- -- .44,--a-r, a
'•'''' ..'licc-',;••••,-17":„-itaa'''.% • ',•-• • 1 t•ti,E.. ."4, 1."1" 0,- ,le.,...:?(TT-4-4i0,-,*:..10 -41;:!0'. \:,k :-:,- - dz-n4ii-.- ;,I,I,.,-. 40,. .?:,,,
ikr...7-,YP,..": .. ; ,,A'‘41":!: 4:'-. -ZO.eli'sers.4'.2iM,K4'4-kkr.P.4' ;'.7-.2-17."-giV-V4\-•
i • i ... '.....s'i,2:41-ef'*. '11-eN "!'re:ii'Zitti::,.';;*A.."4 qa1;,:,i _f‘-'4.4f,i,:4,,,,,ipse,i.-„,t14.2;41-;,1-:,t-,.p.,$).F__,..isif r y. ,..e.., :1.,,y,tr„,. ..44.4..7,...,.,,.,..iv,wo.,:a .*;,,,,,ar_ '+' ‘....• el ,
t .....-.4.4. A'' 4 • . „...
+"..,,..',:'77,,t,, ' t,..: -4371`4!"":".1' :*''''.1;'`-41''''i•Wrg.';‘''''''''.. '' r'-'ig?pdi-...-:-i'-.s4.-.'i,--llt,',,'.e;.,.%'•.-f-•„,i',-, L-il'"1•.k''.,1.,-,...i'.,,,-,•,6,.111 4.1t-,:0`.A.-"t:",...,..'1*'-:,..v.'*••'!•r••-7.D'•*.i'-•‘.4,:',y,,..-.-.:':-1 14"'i,'t'-,.''•.$"':"''4,:i.'4,":.''-•-'•-'.0:*:'''•'1'''''''''''
.xJ.-.."..,.,-i i,.•;-4,-i•f.--.,r',:i..:„.,.c.,.--.-:.;,'.,-.4,5 1t•E.-!'-i e.,i.7.744.-:g.'4t.7.0e,',t.,...-,--••.1•,2-".,.-°1,,p.,'...f'4..1_.i3f•li4.r,1i.,`l,SA-ei i..-._,p.'.;'-'.s.;-'•ZA,%,0g.:A„'','1•,:r,,•,..A-.'V,at 4 4?I',0L-o._...i ja1..k,_l'41_i,k f-'4;,'•..?;k/t e P'.'.'r,,4..'c-9•.•4.':,-6 c i',,4v0i%..1.,.p,,,-1•.-',i,.;-;;";.,:;0t',-.t,„&-A;I6-X,Yt,igk,,.,1Si.4..V,y,1.t,4.'•',.111.-..,,',,.-,'4t'-',e-4:6,,.5-.z".,..-P4o.:•,2;-',k?',,i.,.1;,„,'e,.-/-42,,,'V,,.r.;4,,S4,.f,1,f.4•,t1-,A.?l.0.l,..'.‘‘'4:a..i.-"5."7.^1v--.,??1,',,,,,:,4,-',q''t'',',-,,%:,;,"-''''...i';,4;‘t.,.=K)o',!-1.•)9r.:›W-4',11..'t4-:3.t4,•Y.1.':•l1si.1'261."-TP.F,•,i.714.4-'1I)4•*,,'P-s-i.1.c1_.fk,Iik•r-T.i.r-TS.,.,-7A4,O•7-t.-r,';'?'--.,t't"h•i"'-t',1„.fq4.-.11i-10-.P,-4--*.V4-.'41,-“A".EIN•N.fe11„.,-',.,,1b.%.,.:,,-:-.1,.;.tt,:',1n.7,',,1.l,..1t3:1'.',"7.',1,i-'-,;3i:•V,&-,=4.''I.:.14%-.'&.0.r.f.,.:.7".-".,,;t-k:,?-t.:-,,ip:i--..4,ik."':!'k,I-,!',.'Vi1.','`.'q7A0<-,;'t.',tte.-l,,.,•,..,,'4,,,At,i.'A.,..yt,4-,'.:k;--lA,,'.tl1.-.g;tV--r-r,•A4.-'.:vZ'3-.4r:•::-;.,4,:?4/.I,'.rk4,,-.!•I,.1'-V..4i.-4-4.i7•,:`-•.,,.:,i„7:4'",,A^-:i./! 1ii.''.r,.,.AP-:1-.-3-.-17-6 4',1,-,'-%,4F::-:;a,.,.-''.5:C.V..7 i--1(r-.4:ir,k..,=k,:-1;i,.'4'Z.'1',',''•i.4l f!,e,'i.:':',i,s:.ie.,l.2i.i..-.4n-g,.•.z-k.F-i1.,,.'-f,1'..A---.,*'-.'L-,'-,-M.1L-0:.,,,t;,-",.•,.-j..7„4,.-,.-t.;..7;,,*,..,.'.1,,..'r,.:,i,:.,-•.,'',,,•4,:`,,=-:-,'-''t•.:'-.',.,4;deaffri'•l:f i'x,,,Vk,',;-,;',,,',4i:,2s,,L.,-,';4.i.`.I:LV41.k1',::"'1rV'[;.",4..•;,-.*N.',.v.l,,',,1.-,,1,5,*,,i''a'.-.-.4•,kt';,i'*>.,Ti''i-i'kl:4-,,;7.:A i4-e,4 g?k.V14„,7.'.:',0t';;t'1;•.;.':.;•I,--
,
.i•
0a. N-4Z1
r-
11 .
ii i.,...-
•-c"-V, V,:t/7.,•__•v'ttr-4•;:_ff. ,„4.4, •-•-'1,.
,.„.-..4,1, '-..*,• ‘.,,, • 4,....mt*J&V.A-5-6'..-_-..77.-7: ,2 -44,;.,-.- ,,itt:'*,,„,,,,,.;4;,,,, : ' ,, .'.41140.1,k ;, •-a z< ,... I,fr. ,' 'ti.,..,A.. ; ..3•.''.,',V;.,5:t".* r'reNk...,1
-,-••••••.".•'-• ' .Z.•-,= r qN•IN''.47:41itl1/4.•,•". ''..41',..:'.. •'..''''• 11:..'*-Vlit•It,**•,.1'.t.i., 1 ' •''i 41 if.4 '( ".''',..' ,4•0''Aff•' ; A 44t4:: "1-•-''' ,,,c.: .1.•.14•4;• 44A'-irtifil o .
1•_,%•'-' l'i el • rgle•-,••:.,,,.•-,":,-,,...,,,,0,----7-e,,-16:,,,ti..,,,,,,iz•i,-6.-t-•,-4;ir. ;45,-," •t A•tritid; 7-,,,c. ,'..,,, ,,,:::, , r.0;4,T., ..•ft. • %-‘-, -1.4.
-r-1.44,•• , :,..,.. ... :4-,..-•.r.,,,,,,,471,,,. L. .1.•i', AC4 "`"" ,..1-1.p,ger, :., , ,
.: a 1 1,, ,,.sf r s • •' y a , ' lb,:'14:*4-,.4),
i :'''''', -, •'*".--,
4,-,-r".,"4,, --tY —----. ,r..,;' `4;,,,,, • _::.;•-,,,,q,.• L,'-'"---tEr, ;, := .,im I' ,44-`ep,..:s.te ‘,' , i-or101,16/•,., 4 TiS!,;,, at. .. ' -n -44, -• A • -w • -• ••,-, . -.v.*. -• -,--•••• • ,,.....*,-,,•.: -,
.'„' . ''," i.,,, 4. : Av.,- ' --------vt7:' 1.14-tf.`-''.1-.: '- 'tq , dordp.r, ; i ' i tv •,]..7.- :. • ,,• rip.,„*" •,.1
4.41. '110 ,', - ,,,,,- ." 44 !..-,..--,,,..,.',; ....?_ao,„,.. .; •••,,-x;:aocoi , .i.4
-', ..::11,5_, tlieff.: -"-',..,,....... - ,,..7•-•:=- ,.A..,-,;r7V., ,‘..... I!! ' --:•-e-i';.441,,' ' ,ii..ill'i',..i.•. .',,, >, r, g ---.i.!V%rte-:' • -viiZzt. ii,.-..'4„,-";,..1;% t . --.- . .:,„,,• -.,
„4;••••,•,•10.: ••••': ,I‘cr,,Pit--;,±."„Lei
'''':`,..•::;1;- 'f.e2.10:- i '''J ...- ,,, , -.4-, - ,,,,,' p•-.4,5-;,4—ra.•, 4 . .
, .,„ t•I''''',, .„r• ;!..,';•,--„,."-• ,-. - •
'10 7 !".1.;•.')4
„v.,,......„„-:-..„,...„,„ •.3.1.14„,e-gb•44-„A„rt-fhlf.f, .- ., a -.),L.,••,•.4; it ••,11.,w,v t,i,:,... . , , '‘.. a ,...„, --,.....,0,..„,..„„,„.,
•-•:-.-.-
•,,,,,.....- ,..„... „:..t„.•.•.-.-...,-,,...tp• ..„.... ,....4".
-
_ , „...,„„ ,,,,,,,,„„,: - . ,... ...,,,,,,,,,,,4,4,-.,,,,,,-,,,Ti‘..t.44,...1,_,.„;. . „„,,, . ,.....;....7.......,,, _.;.••••,-.. ,,,,,.,,„„;.„„ • ,„,„„„, ,„.,,,,, ,,,,,c,„ • .. e...e . . . -A"' et'. A' ,..,.., ,' "..." '' _..,.......4 efr•zrti ..:i,711,.. .,,,,,
% , -1,• ...t -
re:rs.LILV,M111)
,' ''./:'..*,'" ' ii.,,,,,,44 '..,.„A......„:„,i,:4„ • . :::727.-.;,...."----::: —:.-vir' - i- 47'24 .----
,
.. , . 4„r .. '7- 7'A-- :"'""riatc17. 4. .. . itT•
, • , IS , - .07z-,71.,, „,,„
,..,
. ,
If-L.--"---"' 'II rs.i. .•;1 2 -,..,..„i 6.-..y.
•,t,,,,,,, L _ ..4, 1".• -
I 1' 7 li 11 7 I; IA3.1; ?' -1 1. - .4;.• , '110. 44.'1:15'0.•4 i -3u-tr,-4, ,.-, . r...4
. .-, .' • „... 4 .... 9 1 df or .....i. ( 1...,'"..• ' '`' "'1' .'
''% "t!';':'''..,,,.-.2.4.:•::ills,'-,..,,'„,,
f-:-.2.;.1,--:_ • i -.,0. .../...4.. ._. ,t. . •...... ... .
-,,,,.. ., _.,. . ...._ q-. - - - -.
0
"-. .-..,,;,p::., ,,,: -7;41%4.-*KIP1•P: - ••1 i. .
1 043.4..14.; 41'7 4-11...0.,..' .1:1.cl.t1-2..swerigtH vs: ...q"--9:6 ;'941 C.••••4 ty c :t2.,,T.:7'.:ei.,-P 1:mt: : ' ".-.---....1
1-..i.7 '.' ' - -.''.- lc-,,,- "I?„III- . .'1. ' • -IP-2, • TM4-
I.3,774- ,-. JA •:,-.V "......K. :"tr..2.-• ..!'-'4"----- / 7"-Tnli A r• Al 2,1. Ai 1,, 4 11 • : , ,„.0 a',41. 1.1, 414,11 1,,i -.,, 1 6 ,i I, 1,1_.11 I ..Pi& .,Il ...Irtir...44.-k-U. ..-1 -trkvir:-•,_._:,.....• -
1
-— . Ks- • .k-" - -; •.•••••• •;,.. ..„z; 4.4i •1.1 (I. i i El: ia; i.,„,, t,--,•. i I, 1, .1,A .,,N.,- eo ,
CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT () R--/1/).\\
Ig DIED , \
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SEP 2 197<<
File No . SP- %ol7 7? Date Rec' d.
Application 'Fee $ Receipt No . y2/y! �K 'rJ
Environmental Review Fee $
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1. Name THE AUSTIN COMPANY Phone 206-226-8800
Address 800 SW 16th Street, Renton, Washington 98055
2. Property location _ SW 19th Street between Raymond Avenue (Extenol and
Lonqacres Race Track
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
Parcel A - Government Lot 13, Section 24 , T 23 N, R 4 E L W.M. in
King County, Washington.
Parcel B - The North 340 Feet of the East 438 . 9 ft. of Henry Meaders
Donation Claim #46 .
4 . Number of acres or square feet 30 . 8 Acres Present Zoning G
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Preparation for
possible future development.
6. The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale
' existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 '
B . Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map • (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation and
Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in
Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above .
7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER' S ACTION:
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept.
�., 1-77 ;;<;
1 'r
•
-
•
7. Location of proposal (describe the, physical setting- of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the' land area affected by any environmental impacts, including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding. of the environ- •
mental setting of the proposal) :
PeoPeoe7r /5 Go4e9TEO 7Ni /Ef7 of
e,QYMONb .Aye 314/ /9 re' S T. PeemiE7E,e
T,2c 47S 'pee- wo 7 iHlpRodED ND#e 41.2E- Titey
COieCTJ�
8. Estimated date for completion of the' proposal :
5'00 COMPLETE ' Y ✓ULY /98d/ /DO /o CoM,4 er6 ff�.SEDr/
9. List of all permits, licenses or: government approvals required for the proposal
(federalr, state and local--including rezones) :
•
/ Al e /0/'2_17L/C/97evtj ( E/Av4 piee,009ee7)
5fieCo e.. �E�A4/7" : r/GG/NG ,4.4)0 6/0,9 /Ain , •
•
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related_to or connected with this proposal? If yes, ,explain: ,
Nb •
•
•
•
•
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your
proposal? ' If yes; explain: •
•
'Yo -
•
12. Attach any other ap:plication, form that -has been completed regarding the pro-•
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
. date, describe the nature of such application form:
/DEL o.v- A¢/ooC-/crq Tio.J TO ,A)
N E'0fQ •FuTvic.
•
.
•
II. ' ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
(1). Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes .in geologic
•
substructures?
YET— MA 1TB E 0
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- -
. covering of the soil? K . -
Y,ES MAYBE NO
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief •
features? "
YET— UM" AU—
,
•
(d) The destruction,- covering or modification of an
y
unique geologic or physical features?
. X
Y .MAYBE AU—
(e) Any increase in wind or water- erosion of soils,
either on or- off the' site?
YES M YBE NO
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of' beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify-the channel of a river or stream or the
• bed of'the 'ocean or any .bay, inlet or, lake? ' x
Explanation,: (b) (CY. • YES )MAYBE A�
C o M/2,41C Ti o/J .9r iO 'O.YE/e CoYE.i?i.tl6 • d F 7"/tE
moo/L ff 4,)i • C .Atov G E /N 0 )E
Ta "AO/0i/0J6
� r
I •
. •
•
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON - —
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM , ',, a!1:7[D
C L
/;CEP
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 4/
Application No.- 47 �` f
Environmental Checklist..No.
PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date:
' Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and -local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals: Many of the, questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1.., Name of Proponent 7--bie . /4140/n/ co,
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
ea S.YV bet 5T.
1Q'eNTO.1! VY . .9'80
/� 5S
206 - e26/88 6 o
3. Date Checklist submitted
4. . Agency requiring Checklist G/ Ty o F r e/0n.)/ /��44J4A'r/C� De;
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
6 QO/NG AND P 'L L,ivCr PeoeA4/7
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature):
P/i.4 I NO a1i0„o8 g 3o,8 46,26 / /A)
rive v,GLE'Y oFF'66. /ttDJJT2/.414. J/4.eg
•
•
-4-
(5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , •
insects or microfauna)?
• 1VES- MAYBE NO
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
VIES MAYBE NO
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
• of fauna?
yrs- MAYBE NO
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _�
YEB S•MAY-BE NO
• Explanation: (ci) • rNee- . , v BE JDMA* N//404./F6 $ i 9
/9S £/943e3/73 F/E4..4 Ai/LE' f .E7C. 774eAt7 W/44 ,BE
.l1/5PGAc ED Y F/L4...ini6 ,4An? G,e4D/4/(( •
(6) Noise. Will the proposal increase ,existing noise levels?
YES MAYBE KO
•
Explanation: '
•
•
•
(7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?
V— MAYBE
•
Explanation: •
•
(8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present• or planned land Use of an area?
YET— MAYBE KO`
Explanation:
•
•
(9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural .resource.s?
YES MAYBE 'NO
{
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
•
•
(10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) -
• in the event of an accident, or upset• conditions?
. YES- NUR- 6
Explanation: .
•
(11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, .density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area?
YEy- MAYBE
•
.Explanation: • •
-3-
(2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? YE3-' MAYBE . 41/4
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? }�
YEr MAYBE p
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally?
TEE- MAYBE 6"
Explanation:
•
(3) Water. Will the proposal result in: •
(a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of
water movements,, in either marine or fresh waters?
YES- MAC NO
(b) `Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
Y€E- MAYBE
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
YES .. raw NO
(e,) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
YE3- MAYBE ND-
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
YE3- MA rf B€ N 0
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water, quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria,
or other substances into the ground waters?
VET- MAYBE KU-
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?
YEE- .MAYBE' AU—
. - Explanation.:
(4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change In the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops,,/�;
microflora and aquatic plants)? Vat--
E _
MIT Fro-
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? . -
( YEf MAY BE.
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
In a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing •species? • TET MAYBE Nf-
(d) ' Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? wAvir 16-
Explanation:: ('a
l�v��!'COY I•e�4 ,eXIf T%,)l, .P.r4lIE1 W
x.f'.':�"......�:�Sytih':Y"+.:M.vti'v:t c}'.„:'-:"• 's: �"� ..:.s..:....-n..::e... t.v.:.:' ., c:.,.t..e.:.:n";..•.y I - -
W.
•
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
YES MAYS NO
(e) Storm water drainage?
YES WET 6—
.
(f.) Solid waste and disposal?
YES • MAYBE NO
•
Explanation:
(17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
. YE- MAYBE NO
Explanation:
(18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the •
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
' YES MAYBE NO
•
Explanation:
•
(19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
YES WIT N
Explanation:
(20) Archeological Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, •object or building?
TES-- MAYBE NO'
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
p � Proponent:
le d,24„,„:„/„.41--
• (si ned)
YeLONt D. /-71Cgj STAG-e7
(name printed)
City of Renton
Planning Department
• • 5-76 •
I \
cs
s�f -5- •
(12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? J
' YES MAYBE NO
• Explanation:• '
. (13) Transportation/Circulation: Will the proposal result in:
(a) 'Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES. MAYBE NO
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking? .
YES E NO
MMAYB
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods? x
YES- MBE NO
(e) Alterations; to waterborne• , rail or air traffic?
YET— BE NO
MMAY
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? .)(
YET7 MAYBE•
N '
Explanation:
•
• 1
- (14) Public Services. Will • the proposal have an effect upon. or •
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the .following areas :
(a) Fire protection?
• YES MAYBE NO
(b) Police protection?
YES MIT NO
(c) Schools?
• YES MAYBE NO
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES ' MAYBE NO•
••
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? )4(
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services?
YES FiTiTE NO
Explanation: - S -
•
•
(15) . Energy. W ill the proposal result in:
• (a1 Use of substantial amounts •of fuel or energy? ,
• • YES UTNE
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require .
the development of new sources' of energy? X
YES MMAYBE N6.
Explanation: •
•
(16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas? • .
"YES . MAYBE NO •
(b) . Communications systems? yG
YES WIFE NO
(c) Water?
. , t, . .. _Y.::,, , -ti:,.,,,».s:.�, ,.;�,.... ..,,t::.., ,_, ..., .,...,. J :..,., ...... ,,... „,,..., ,. .,,. . ........ .. . . ... . ......:...�..,.. ,, ,.Y,ES,,..,,...MAY.BE• . NA.. ., �.,.,. ,, .,...,,x...
•
•
•
•
O r .
AFFIDAVIT
/VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. ,
/ (formerly Metro Industrial District)
I , Paul S. Chiado, an officer of / , being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this 27thday of September- , 19' 79 ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Seattle
-00--r----,--1----,_0
` J---(1"c-f-----(-0-0---._ - .
f5-
(Name of Notary ublic) ign ure of Owner
Donna J. Trulson Paul S. Chiado
8414 8th Avenue Southwest, Seattle, WA 800 Southwest 16th Street
(Address) (Address)
' ) Renton WA
(City) (State)
206/226-8800
(Telephone)
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing applicatio Alfse-e. inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete n ve- p ticular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the R c.�n{) �rzing�Department
governing the filing of such application . h v
sEp 21 191
,� jDate Received , 19 By: --- -
N/NG DEQP
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73