Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA79-433 SAP BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE SPECIAL PERMIT SP- 'l33- 79 $5d UNION AVENUE N . E . 10- $ - -79 FIRST GItU2CN QF 'RiE AR NR2 ENE 1� 1' � .. . . _ ....y . 1 ,i -... A 0 , p t • r; :�I 6. _ • 1�...f 1 • •' .r � , (- , L +: `�� . . .,.........,..._ ...;a.•m.r�� •--. ......y .yam . _. . . ,: a„ { + , . ..•.,.,. , 5-.T.-z f ' "iii"•14. r, , ...t.A'•,-4-, r--- . -- , . • figyypLLpjj ' I.::.:_„. • ° w•µ �, :'T '�•{i e-:`, {t ' C1- . 'GI r , ''1, ; •" .1 y, . 1•. -TIT.:! "1' i w.,r • G1, r.;, 7 • ( . ,. . F a4 Ph! • -j. ;..,•.t ;,f� ye. .` '`.r�', aa ,� vny+-• .4 • J-`(1 ^I. .� 1 I 1 'Hi :r.J.�•.•s.. • t ja• to .. r • • i C �f y ..I.1 lt_•I' oja,r.f sl'• - a 10 tp sr •rY*. . . '• •? •• ',.r•.' °ti 1 1.w.o•r� • }��qq � •re,.., r'.• • ,i' ••1., '•1••( -••/4.:'' 1; ier:411°)Pfili°: ..,• :efll'' . I i"• • .,l ��dr 4, ,. ; 1 . ... r ). ..• ..... 1 ....,:: ....... ..... ..., •.., r ' • i ill•• '• :,1 V 4.`'n tr. ...�.� . ..Y t. , r• , . • • • .. , , I,,� • �a a . I . •„C .. 5 ;• •;„., �� ,.,1.1 "�`{ ill• ` 4y+ • i l ',• 1 • i !..t..1:14)10..1 '.2......•*.'-..:. A 1. :5 ". f". 1 0.4 C(itt:t: ::,'I C/I 1. ,..,.; 4:41.Lliiii,, ... F4q:,, 1 14 3 ; .?. .: ;:',.!_ti..TI 7:01- I.) . .,„ CONN.6 22.02i0•....00•NFs• • t 11? .c1\ .\-‘ . .4. �9 Iy � t a - ,` ► �1 •y rGL— _, ta 1 'a I .11 o /�•}y• II 1 1 ]r •,�- i� r ��•♦tt♦♦♦ r r ter-•- �r , .,r U U U a,`` ..J D U LJ O L] 0 fi" ,O / / �� , , 2 ',. ---- i DOD0 0 o r i •s1 :.,,,. . .: :® ®;c n ® <s 0 Ei A g. /0 T H r• [E.-3 I1,, i. ® sae ®' ® ® O � SSb18 uI mil; 01 ill 0 . 1113 4WD Si ,Ti fil;.:,,,,.:-.:1••;.., .. II Cr5 ' I I do mum ao® ea=0©e=0ea=No ©®ca areal ©ammo 6 B El How ee1.18 1 51. 1`..g SP. S SF. r I� `S.F• I 0 .0''. 0 t two. 91' C s1V L.lis9i j'5 O ®p ® ®® Q B �• CC0®rD ® . ` :�:oaw. amp r .. ..: • ':':•:.:''''''':'••....: .:.111.::C's'.;• C;1 .::. keltiiii PerAikt ' • • ors/o aszi GP amp®tea r ®o arm up ss ens • ‘...........k.......j • ''® B.g V I Homy Dap, ditstuseame Z El stetoof. , : , S 413 1 ' 1-1, 1;-.. • cell/ L114I13 .s-,,,,.-- as®•® •®o •erase•moo• a,,, PQ oe ® ®• ® wlfzfO sap oas.aamos am ens ea Ufa• I�}6�3 %% e ® I ii ® ' Ig$®I • - -- %% \% 0 ® ..' % I (1 : I', VS% i . , ca) i 1111/03•MIES) - - • '• - ' /..^ ,' i'kk' -‘) 4# ` ••-""" w -r�N G 1) -1"- , 7. :- �- �f�,r•.; �_�.._..�. �i,� �G°'4? 1�,, fin,r �;c. .. •S'v;rut,.� - ' [ T,i ` Renton ,'C.i't Council '- ::.::. • • ,.t 12/1-7/7. 9 ':Page ? • .. .',. . , .. : - -PUBLIC .HEARING - Continued- , SE.,Quadrant !.Lett'er from Planning Director •`Ericksen .expla;ined the update • , • '1ComprehensiHve of'.',the a;rea•• Comprehens`ive::P.lan, 'both negative :and pos$tive' • IPlan, Area •"C" aspects -and ••recommended moderate expans ion of the. Land: ,Usez* ,Continued Plan.`to include-, l ow`density and medium• density to the -south..and . = :east:;'of';:the:Va': l ey 'Gener`al'.' Hos:p i-tal •.to'•.',i ns,ure.•.managed• grow,th:.of •1 " •• area:. MOVED BY SH'I.NPOCH SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR ' • 'F.IV.,',;'M1'NUTES.' ,-CARR;I ED': ;:Counci l:'recessed, at,;8:30 p.m: 'and re-7 • con ened:.a't::8,c 40.,p:m... Al 1 • Council. Membe'rs'; present 'at Roll Cal 1 . -• Continued • Let,ters,••o'f. ;protest ..were reed:opposing,• multi-family .residential : ' •. south• - of the::area`_proposed;'•by. Planning,•Commi'ss ion, from,: •Nancy` . • .- • ' •Purcell: and.'Cly.de C': ,Med.l'ock, 1006,` S.E: 192nd; also from. Barbara • • i Fenkner, ,100`i-5: SE. .1`92.nd:;;,Kenneth W. .,and JoAnne Powel 1 ,' 19027 - ' 192nd, SE; -Stefan and-'Shi.rley. M'i 1 1.er, -:10204' SE 192nd St. ; ' . • '. G:' Warren and •R.,:,El':aine. Diamond,: 4914 Talbot' Rd.,S. ; Mr. and .'. -- • Mrs-. ' Robert D-.. Wi'l;son:,' 720'.S.'..,',55th St. ; Josephine and John - y .. ' A. .Wi A. -,, 94.03S:. 1.92nd .St,,. • . 9 '' . C'ontinued Plannin• Director• E:ri;cks,en: expl:ai.ned the present •and recommended, - . comprehens i;ve';Olan, .,.' Pl'enni:ng::Departmen.t' Dave. Clemens used; • walls maps :and:.poi:nted. out 'var-i.o.is, growth items. MOVED. PERRY, ' SECOND .'SM:IIVPOC•H,`;.RECESS:, CARRIED'., All present. Roll Call : 10:08 p..m. Audience' • Aud i-ence,,Comment ,;..Speaking' in. favor.`of 'expanded multi-fami 1y ' . Comment ' residential (sou,th of.:the•;;,a.rea •:proposed in the Planning. Com-• 1 ' m i s's i on recommend'a:t i on),to`•;S:' 192.nd .S't.: :' John ••Tynes,• Harbor . '' • Investments, Arr.•owh'ead".Deve.lopments, •Federa1 .'Way,-. MOTION BY PERRY, .•SECOND, SH.I NPOCH,, GRANT' ADDITIONAL TIME BEYOND THE '' • FIVE MI•NUTE;'',LIM�ITATI,ON,`-•.,�CAR'RIED... ' S'-1,i:de: presentation• by •• ' . - - . - Ed' Unger`, ''Herbo'r , Investments, Federal Way;:;Fred .Bowser, •16044 : . 16th- SW,;';Seatt,,le, :Net•.Wash;ington,• 170 Mercer •St�. , Sea.t•tle :' ' Recommended Plan :Darrel' Connell ; R&.H- -Co 3468' West Marginal "Way, Seattle;• Ferd 205 Acres: • Relch1 in at 1.3033.:15th' $W; ';Burien;.• Douglas :Morsel , 4614 Talbot Rd. S'. Public Presons ' present:':speaHng 'in favor 'of Planni.n% Commission 'Pla-n C,: &, Quasi 33 Acres Bob Wilson•, 720-,S:;, 5.5th'- S-t,. ;-•:Nancy Purcell ,'• 10006, SE 192nd, - ' Single Family " Grover'-Shegrud,_4518' Talbot' Rd.;S. ;. Roy ,Fournier., 4700• Talbot- Rd. ' 125 Acres S--.'; Warren Diamond 4914 Talbot Rd.S. ; ,Ela:ineDiamond p'resented.' ' . Low Dens ii ty MF - petition *bearing 1,4's i gnetures;• of area.;res i dents requesting the - I 15-20 Acres Council acceptance of',Commissiion Plan C' °'-Art, Peterson, 49.15 ' . . .Medium Density Ta1bot' .Roa'd' S-; .,opposed, mul..t..i-:fami.1y• residential designation' , . - ;' 25-30 Acres MOVED BY.SKI NPOCH, SECOND-•PERRY, PUBLIC' HEARING BE CLOSED. . ' ' CARR•I ED.. MOVED ,BY STREDI CKE,''. SECOND SH.INPOCH,. COUNCIL ACCEPT I � REC•OMMENDATION,.`OF THE; PLANNING 'COMM!COMMISSION -AND' REFER MATTER - - TO .THE WAY.S ,AND.'MEANS COMMITTEE FOR .PROPER .ORDINANCE. CARRIED .. - Time: ' .11 ::08. p,'m. , , AUDIENCE COMMENT MOVED BY 'PERRY, ,SECOND ;CLYMER•, ,SUSPEND'RU.LES.' AND ADVANCE AGENDA , ' ITEM ,9:.a.. .TO 'BE'READ :'AT' THIS 'TIME. 'C;ARRI.ED. , • First Church of Lett.er,'f ro•m Hearing,,-Examiner Kaufman_ Called ed attention• to • :;, the Nazarene Novembe=r.21 ,. 19.79-..`r.ecommiendation 'regarding: First Church .of•' ,. , . 'Rezone R-434-79 the Nazarene Rezone.R-:434=79: ,and Special" Permit • SP-433-79. . SP-433.-79 ', property .locate&'in,'the vicinity •of 850•,Un'i"on Ave. NE, just and;•• north,;o.f.'Honeydew'Elementary School •on 'the: east' side of Union . Appeal ' ` Ave.'• NE,• .reques't for "rezone f rot. GB, 1 • to.:SR-.1 and special ;:, ,.' .perm•it. to'const,ruc.t;'•.a:„church`,and associated i ated -educational ' facility. ', ' 'The Land• Use:,Hearing;,:Examiner :,recommended approval ,of the rezone .� ,• and.,denial .of' 'the::sp:ecial ';permit. .'Tf a .letter 'reported appeal was'-filed ••with-i-..nthe: '1.4""=da er.i'od.' . . • ' Continued P.lanning,and. Devel:opment Committee Chairman' Perry submitted . ' 'Planning and • . ' report:':concu:r::ri.ng with'',the":recommendation of- the Land U'se. ' Development Hearing Examiner for approval of, rezone for First ,Church' o • , Committee Report '•the Nazarene R434 79 and":,recommended ',the;„City 'Council reverse , . , . Rezone..R-434-79• . • the Exami;ner>; s.= re.commendat,i,on, .and grant X:he>;.S,pec i.a l.,,Pe.rmi,t, , ' SP-433-79 .`SP-433-79 based n o . r rs ero ' of :fa.ct•!and law concerning 'Conclusions ' i . :No 6 and No: ;,14): re•: ''1.00;;f.t':'.'setback requ i cement: ' MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, •CON,CUR. IN •RECOMMENDATION:OF 'COMMITTEE AND •REFER- - . •'.TO.-THE WAYS':AND`':MFA•N'S COMMITTEE. CARRIED,. .: . PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT DECEMBER 17, 1979 FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE (R-434-79, SP-433-79) The Planning and Development Committee concurs in the recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner for approval of a rezone from G to R-1 . ' The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of the above- mentioned recommendation dated November 21 , 1979, and recommends that the City Council reverse the recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner and grant the special permit requested, based upon the following errors of fact and law: 1 . Conclusion No. 6 is in error in that the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed church complies with the various requirements of. Section '4-706(3) (a) . 2. Conclusion No. 10 is in error in that the Zoning Code requires a 100 foot setback between proposed churches and lots which are developed with single family residences. The Committee recommends that the City Council reverse the recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner in relation to the special permit , and that the ' City Council grant the special permit. • G ge Pe ry, Chairman FZTL�sc�-�c� Barbara Shinpoch kenton City Count i-l .` , % 779 12 1 / Page 3=. . _ , . . . AUDIENCE COMMENT Continued ,f:- ,,. tor';,Lowe l.�l''We`.l ker,_,f i rs•t Ch r " Spec i a l . Perini t . Pas ; ,., • ,. , , urch Of Naza+'ene, thanked Granted SP-433-79 the Council,'for, action 9 9`,re a,rdi ng P.e. p'"s c i,a l .ermi.t•,re uest: q _Release of Gary Strother., °W:R V` COrporation, 400..1.08th Ave. NE;.: Bellevue, . Easement. ' -;•; representing owner and, developer 'of a `4.5. unit apartment (High ' •NE 12th $t. and land Park Apartments) `at 12th and Lynnwood requested Council; Lynnwood NE authorize the vacat ton'of sewer easement:.wh'i ch.. i s :no longer,. ' ,`requ,i.red: due •to re=rout.ing:; ;Strother.;also explained that sale :.of the:. property;has been arranged and must,'have :the easement. 1 removed before ti_.tle can be conveyed. "-Public: Works Director, ' Gonnason explaEned the' need: for authorization .to relea'se'the easement and:• used..map to explain need. •:•MOVED .BY CLYMER;' SECOND; HUGHES,, CONCUR I ,THE_:RECOMMENDAT I:ON; AND . 'AUTHORIZE•.THE MAYOR _ ,. , AND ,C.ITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENT. CARR.I.ED. ' ,OLD BUSINESS ' MOV•ED.'•BY SHINPOCH-, SECOND TR'IMM, :TRANSFER'''$10,000 FROM CONTI•N. • ;Canine Unit :.GENCY, FUND TOR' CANINE ..UNIT,;PURCHASE OF DOG,' TRAINING' OF Author i zed • .OFF1 CER, .ADJ_USTMENT :OF,',:CAR..AND REFER. ••THE MATTER. -.TO THE;WAYS ` 'AND.. MEANS COMM I•TTEE ,Lt Perss'ons' noted the training cost of i '.$1 ,82:5!_, including-.transport:ation, i S i nc.l:uded in the $•10,006 : ' • I ' budget:° MOTION-CARRIED Mayor Delaurenti. •Counci .l.. President. Shinpoch;; presented .presente+d, Mayor Del aurenti Honored with with,.a :gift ;from the:Counc i1 Members express i'n.g honor for . Crystal Decanter s the 37*, years;. service.'. to the'.City.::as-.Councilman and Mayor: . Mayor•'De•l aurent is received ;a stand i n ovation. Beth Campbell . Rubric'Safety:,OOmm:itt:ee •Chairman 'Hughes noted meet i ng. re the Traffic Acc i dent •.Beth' Campbell letter request..f:or change in 'law Concerning with Bicycle.. - reporting of, traffic".raccidents; .'that this is a civil matter 12/3 Referral • and City.:Attorney Warren, ii s'•responding, Noted for the record as: requested by Councilman' Hughes. ' Ways and Means .Ways and;Means,:`Commi:ttee ,Chai"rman C•l.ymer� presented report • Committee Report, requesting a public hearing. be set for.:.February 4, 1980. regard- • Honey Creek . ing..`the proposed:ordinance. relating .to facility. and trunk :con Trunk Line nection charges and establishing a:; trunk,'1ine, set-Vice charge -. .. Ord i nonce - :'and'. trunk.line service area' In the .Honey:Creek and Kennyda l e '. , ' Public Hearing . areas:: . The 'ord inance 'also. esta•blishes the amount Of connection 2/4/80 . • • charge•and allowances, for annual:'cost, of living increases MOVED BY CLYMER,:• ,SECOND STRED.I CKE, REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR.'�RES';OLUTION. ."CARRIED. ' Vouchers. The .Way.",s:, and_:Means :,Committee `recommended Council approval for ;"payment ,of Vouchers 26079 through. 262.47 i n the amount of $61`3,883`.5-7.:-:havi;ng. r,.ece i ved" depa,rtment,a:l'''certification as to ,. receipt of merchandi'se and/or services MOVED BY CLYMER, : . VOUCHERS AS; PRESENTED. CARRIED..SECOND,, TR;IMM, APPROVE • .,• 'ORDINANCES. AND::RESOLUT IONS: ::, :' .. : , . Ways and Means Ways and Means"`Committ:ee report recommended' second and .final 'i (Comm i t tee Report readings ,of.:„'an ordinance ,changing the:.payment of social security tax;pe;rmitting;exclus.ion of. s:uch payment on account i; ' Ord ihence. #338,3• Ofillness d i or ' s:ab i'1'ity `•Following• readings, i't was MOVED 'Change" in F I'CA • .BY.,CLYMER, ::SECOND. 'SH'I NPOCH','' ADOPT .THE`..ORD I NANCE AS _READ ROLL. ' Re Sick Pay .. CALL.:- . 6-AY'E S'HiNP,OC,H. .STREDI;CKE;• .PERRY, HUGHES, CLYMER • TRIMM. CARRIED ` : ..'.,;.:':,; .'. :.: :Ordinance #3386 The committee recommended 'first reading,-and. advancing to second . 'CETA Funds ,and :final read i,ngs;:Of: an'-::or.d i nance'.:for:appropriation and ' '•transfer, from unanticipated revenue and Comprehensive Employ ment Tra,i.ninq Fund .(CETA)` to CETA Divisions i n the :amount of ' -$4.5',-:277.;. `,>;Follow.in:g,°f.i,rst .reading ' MOVED:.BY CLYMER, SECOND ' • SHINPOCH, ADVANCE IORCilNANCE TO SECOND AND •FINAL READINGS. . , ' CARRIED F.o) lowiii:g reading,s, :MOVED BY CLYM'ER, •SECOND SHINPOCH, - :ADOPT THE 'ORDINANCE AS READ..• ROLL CALL ALL AYES AS PREVIOUSLY ' ` SHOWN..: CARR:I`ED,.: Councilman :Stredi cke,`noted. for the .record_, , , , :'pay.meat s; 1979`:expend iture,. not."'198.0: , OF R4, ® THE CITY OF RENTON U ®y 0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 oaspe) CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ,43 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 P O1TED sEP1S°®� • November 30, 1979 TO: Parties of Record FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, -Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: File No: R-434-79; SP-433-79; First Church of the Nazarene Correction of Clerical Error With reference to Finding No. 16, it appears that the zoning category for the subject property was correctly identified in the Planning Department Report as "G" (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum Lot Size - 35,000 sq ft) rather than the "GS-1" (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum Lot Size - 35,000 sq ft) indicated in the above Finding. The error was due to the use of an incorrect version of the Zoning Map. The City's Zoning Map has since been corrected. (See attached) . The error, after reviewing the Examiner's Decision, does not appear to be substantive and therefore would not change the decision. cc: Members of Council Planning Department ,4ity Clerk Attachment n� /n.- N OV 1979 tti�,tPEr r•�`� C,aa GI ,.jai I;$i f o i?E; ;u �4) - .-,....i•-4 , _ B...1 . . . • - , . " ..-,..; 41. . . - i. IM7A tits.= 1 t �. Ir • ~ ' f Y �i rri .',t • i l��ar� • .•fr.�`' x .'�C7 0 I r �l'S•uun y�, 'S. ot, , . ,,. . -.. . . :,,,, . .!..-ft,,.. :.,.1 . G _. .N x \ If IO • Z •• p, 4 N• . • G • •- Rsi GS-'I1!., . . . i_....�G_,._._._.�._.,• .,- �. .. .+ •___ ,- . __.� • l ,.._:4,..- �• 1 �—G-7200 !' - .. .F�,,j4,'=�',4!4if"Pl . ,�, r sa 0'44,141 - il 1 :.!r6 ..' ., i/R—I , -j��. - 1_N': w . :;": Y.. • "' i ... II z. YiL.,..-.1,5„Hil 0 ' I • r a 1:I . . 1 R2 �' $ i 1V-I •• i �_ . .:_J? - J �. .. -ir1 r�i +K .—. _. _ . • T�'T 1 f _� fT r>' • i • ... I.i1 .1 ' . II .a. ZONE USE MIN LOT . ZONE USE MIN LOT SCALE 1"=800' • R-1 Sing. Fam. Res.. , 7200. . SR-2 Two''Fam. Res., • . 10000 SECTION ' ' SR-1 Sing. Fam. Res. ' 7500 IR-3 Mulit-Fam.. Res. 5000 . G . ,' Sing. Fam. Res. 35000 R-4 Multi-Fam. Res: 5000 G-6000 Sing. Fam. Res, 6000 P-1 Public Use . G7200. Sing, Fam,. Res. ' 7200 • B-1 Business - G-8400 Sing. Fam. Res. 8400 BP Business Parking PAGE G-9600 Sing. Fam., Res. 9600 L-1 Light Industry GS-1, Sing. Fam. Res. 35000 . H-1 Heavy Industry S-1 Sing. Fam. Res. 40000 T Trailer Park - • 11 • • R-2 : ' ' Two Fam. Res. 7200 M-P Manufacturing Park • ty —, .—,.. T..;•,;.....7...•,,,,177.1%--�o.,.7,1 T mv.7ti wf: a:m.arnnaR;r'W ='Z—' V' . ' aY6?Pr. ' K4,6SA/"V'. °f4"1"$F`: :A;L4,;4t-' y . pF .� , f THE CITY OF RENTON V %6 1 . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 ,,t c CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELO.RES A. MEAD 013 CITY CLERK • O�gTED SEP1��O� • • December 3, 1979 APPEAL FILED BY RENTON CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner's Decision Dated November 21 , '1979, Renton First Church of the Nazarene Rezone,. R-434-79, Special Permit, SP-433-79 To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use 'Hearing Examiner's, decision has been filed with the public records office this date, along with the proper fee of $25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set fbrth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council 's Planning and, Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will -be considered by _the Renton City Council at its. regular meeting of December , 17, 1979• at 8:00 P.M. i'n' the Council' Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South. Yours very, truly, CITY OF RENTON t _a( Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. • • City Clerk DAM/st • • • OF R4,, . ,� o THE. CITY OF RENTO.N • `� Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 a- mai o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • •LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER . • "9 • '° _ FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 ' • • o94TED SEPlett r y1• O ��., . -15.0 December 3, 1979Po C'�� • Members, Renton City Council , (��tl 0t RW Renton; Washington \ CLEWS 4'5gC5 RE': File No. R-434-79; SP•-433--79; First Church of the Nazarene • Dear Council Members: • • The Examiner's Report and Recommendation, dated November 21, 1979, • regarding the 'referenced application was forwarded to Council Members on November 28, 1979 and scheduled for placement on the City Council agenda for December 10, 1979. On December 3,• 1979, an appeal was filed with the City Clerk within the 14-day appeal ,period. • • A copy of the appeal letter is attached for your review prior to rescheduling of the application on the City Council agenda of • December 17, 1979. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the office of the Hearing Examiner. • Sincerely, 'ir141 \CCiLM-H- Fred J. Kaufman cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachments ,--..,"„:)'.,:-=.,!.,:.-15,:::,:.,,-?:::',.':;.:-•=,.4:i .,,.:,„i.!,"'=:•:=',.--.....,..'.:.-':,•,:''=:;.:;:-C-,;.-_,.:,,..;''„%-i....„ - ; ? eI=, TY- OF. .. RE N.,. 3 ,:::.,•;,,,5:-'17';,'.==•-• =='=:::=.. 0..-.. .-..'l.' 6.....'ow„m„—V1„,,,'- .:::•:!:.... ` == ,=, f, ":•=,-k= ..!::: .- ..:'; ,'..=-: '','=..;c==',',7,'=;]A;,g,..'4'4:='!,:"4.1j, / FINANCE- DEPARTMENT-' ,,,,,,,. .,„;...-,;:-.s•-., ••-•-•-...,... . ,...,..,...,.--i.-k_.',.,::=J;f:;:...!-.4i.:,v,.., 44,,,,,,giht,,,..i.!. ..,!,,,,..1.,., ,,,,,.,...•-•.„:?..,,,,,.,•,•,,,,:-..,,,-,,,,....,:-!--"- ,,,..-:-...;.,-,.....,,,..., ..,,,,,..,„,::::1,..,,,,,•,•.:...;.,,,..,...,.•,..,,.. ..,....,..;- , ,:• :..., .•-. ,-.•........•••_:-.,.-,..7.,•,:. -.-...- :.„, _:-.- ... .• - ,.,;.,..,•.,• •.:‘,„••., ...,,,,....„.„,..t.-i.:,..4-,•,..•,..ci.i.:.:...!:•,,,..,--,...-.,-; ,...--„,-:-...., -.•,.._.••,..,.. :,-,..••••,......:,.y._:,-,-.,i,..,:,-,,..•:,,•, .....,,.....•:. t, ,..-....-,..,.......,.;;,•;. .,...,,,,,,,:-,._-,•.., J.,: •,,, :. • ......-t. :,." ,.....-.,2],•,-,.. -.,-_:, . •Th• -_ ,•, _,...." -:. ,•=...,.-,,,,,,,, --; 4,v,,;„:,:r.,;,,,r" 1-.... ....: ,..:: '-‘,:•-:•_;..'..-'-', • f'. ,•7•'' •r.'-,',-'''•'.'•'."'".---.."';',..-;.-.--•:'' ":-','-'•'•',.--:-.1",-:.',`•.';'''':'• ', -','•-' :'-:'::".•.'-••....' '•-.,'• -"'''''•, '''--''::- -••'• • 1,..;,2 - . c.pi...:_,,,i':::;,,,.., -..,--_-,. . --.- _ ..- " ..„ ...., --...,:',.:. -,,- . _,..,... :,,, •.,,-...,,,,-..--- , ....;,-'.,-... •,-,-.,. ..,..• . =.7,-,, .,.,.,. ..:-.--,.... - - '- ,-- - -.-. ' , . ..„,,,..,.. , !y,-r ;,..--., ., ...,• .-.--•-----.- - 6,,kt.*-"::.'",` - '•-•:- ," - .-•':.' • ''''''• ''' • -' - '- -..•, ''';',?..-••,;:7],ii.V.,. .?•'''''' ' • ;•-•'i ' REhT'rON -• WAS HINGTON ': C°114'j, •'. : .: . . '1,- e--• •"-.,'-'-','`, l''' ' ' ''''''''.AC.'/ .. ' ' ,^' / 1 . . . . t' 1. '' ''?.!1 I ''- ''.'. :IVO.2.?Ai n , -- -.; ... -. ........,_....„,...".. ._.,bi!- ,, :,;,:....f?.., Cf")- 7. -(:)0,:_:. !.,c) r,.). TC-ilt-'.CC I]' 'ci'-. :-.. : .- . '. .. ''s -..',..;.;:::.:T,',:r.,?--,,,--,-.' ', .-;.-- • • RECEIVED ,:n.,:c„...,:.,,; ,,c„,7,„,,.:.,,..,,,..,,-,;,::,,,c,,.,•,,,:.„?„,',,,,„:,•:,...,, . . . . ,..,,.,,... .•„,.., , , . , -- oi-„..,1) . . . ,• ,..-1.•-':'...•:: . , , . , . . , . . ., .. _ . ... . •.. ,-,....,,,-:„.,-,..--.-,-.--,4„, , . .....„. .., ., .,- ., -.,.,-„. -. -- . ,• , . . ,. ,.• , 1 T -_,.?-;::?.A.' ",•-•''''.'• 4.'' • :' :- - .. . _ ..... . .. ':...!'....;.,tt,',:'.';......1-,„.-.• . : ‘ ,, . . ,,r...,.,..,, , ,. :,,,, -..•,.• ••• ,., " ' •• ' ' ' ' ' - .' -' : ' . , • . - ....-',.1 . 1'..'..'54';',..14•4,,'..:?4,' . . ,• • - ,. • -. .-., . .. . ,..f. ' ., : ..' '.. .',': "2,-,:',.:-,'41',.21`•1 ' - . . . ..,„, ., , ,„. r „ • . •• '.. '' • ' ' ,.:,;.'•'.. 4: :,1-')''.',-e'Zi;7.c..'17: '.•';,;;;.4,?...;.'.;.;1'-,,;;1.'''..'''.';'' =',:.— , . .., . •.-• , • , . . . ., , • , , ,. ,..,,. , , • . .. . ., . ... , . •.„.....: t••.-'',..,..-=',..,41,7 '''''''.'''''°'''' '' 'i'. ''''''' ' '''' ' ''-' ' ."' ' ' . '' ''''''''''..`. : '''''"'''' --‘:'. - -''''''''''''''''':'''''''!'''2''''''''''-''':'''';'''''',.''''''''!::•.:----'5.' VOTAIJ. - - . •, .,.....)..a7.),,,.::•:,z,,,,, ,:„..,,..„,„ ,...,,,.,. ..,..„ ..:,...., ..,., , ,..., .., .. , , . .,,_... .....:..,...i.,.-„,„ .... ,,,....„....,.....„,.;„, ,.„4.,,z,„•:„.....,..1„„-....„:„.,,,.,,,,....,,,,i,....„.,,:r.„.„ ,,,,,::..hi,.,:,.„:„...,,,,-,,,,,,.,,,,,..,,,,.•:„......,.,„,..:.,....„ . .... • . ..:. „.......„,!..„.,,,, ,1.1....,,,,.•..,•::,:.:•,!..4,,-f,::,.-;,...-.!:.,...,...,:,,,•••••,;. „-.•,_ „:,,„.:.•,!:.,,.„--rs-,..„.:,••• :...,-•,•.:-,-,- •,...-;•.:. ,„...-.....,......:;_ ,-,.,,..c.,„.•,,,,-..,.:.„.,,,,,._....,:,.„..,,,"?..-,-„,,,.:,-.„.5.......,:,..„-..,y....2.,..,:...4:„.,:z;,_:,,,3,:a,.,,..:1.;.,:-. :;,a,,,2.•iff.,,,,,:.-,,,,-;: /;.:,:,,,,,,,,-..,.. •-... ,. .•.,. ..,.....„ ,,,..,.,••,.',,,,i.:1',6'Slr.,',.:,',,,: •','-i,1:.: :'': ,t,''-'''''''''''',i:.:-,,.'.e';'---:;:•:,'..,':..e.f.'i•.,.;'.'....'''',',/,.'S'...'-...,:-..,',..',.....!;,..'''.:',.!.'.','--1.;?'2..:..i',:.''''.....',..,''..:', .:.:''',..,,::;.1';f:',;:::.'' ''. 4.!,:,:.i.ti:::)','-'..'..'"':=:'P.-',:2,5:":=-,':::.=.:,. ., -',.'="•;i:.',-,':=5::,''','.:gr=:1:ic'',,,"'Z=::',`......,- ,:.•:'. ' '''==- ':'=". ,...;='"=":,:l.k','';;4'.'41=',g ,'==!=r-i'l= l'''';''''''-''''.-J11:=','".-='=',::;:=-';-='''''''', -''-=='. '1.".'"..==.•'"f.','"'''''2..-f=i'''''•'2.“."='''-:'---.1'.:'=4.:',-7' '':.''I..•='?`:"1-=', r,_,H, Tat.-:?,/, =i ::?ii;iiiiS -1;i:'-`A:FINANCE',.,p1.REgro... ,,f,i-iti.r ..,,,,,?-.4,. .„77...e..- ,,,.. .,..,....,,,,,....,,,,.: --.•:::..,,.1.,,,,i;-..:,.:.L.:,„,„, ,. .-'...,. ..--•--}...,,',.,,,,.--;.:::,,,,:.2:17,,pki.,g,:i-,,,,,,.--if.,:, •:?:--',;?2,;11:-.,,,:•-„.3:',Y ,':•!'`.',".,.."T.:;:-... :',`.--:'.'3';'-'4.'::,:,;;,.-...i..-,..." ---:...',.-.: -.::;-...i.::: -.y,:;',...,A5,,,,,,-;',r.,..,..-. :-.,..,!!:...fj!c.'-',.:.;14c-4.,. .1'..'"i'-',',3.- :- .-.;!.-_,....:;',;•,....,,..,;:.,,,,,'-.,,:,,-:,--,--. .:i,,,,, ,..,.; It pw2,if-y-1. -.-,--'-,z.,,,,-.'e,.,,,,f,,,:54,4,.,; nr, ,;1:-4-,.,';‘,.:;.?..--."':f,,s,;• .-4;?,;':,.. '-:.-.',r':.''''..:;,",,,-;-•-i.':',;ii:',--.,'•,-,:''• - -',",,••T-"..•_••••.•,,','';',..:.;,.--. 2.'i::'..r...''', •....:1',!,;''''-,;;;?:"-'Oil':''.;-','-,i'2,';',:'4.';i'',.!:"'iii;'.',-: -.=:*•''';',".'::-'3'•'-!.,;•1.,.'-,P,',•,,,[1.:.:t;:..„„,,.1f'', 1'...-'• '1- ' ..', .,. ; . ,, • .• .-•...',-,-i...j-,,-,.,',:,;',:;;;":(3-5',IK:fii.10 -.,•-:•''''...•';„1-•:•,[,'7.--- =/-.:"..•-.:;,'.'...,"•,.,,,--,..:.,:::',-'..;',3-..f'...';-t.,./...'' '' . •''''-',.... -'•-•'-,.--1:-"Z-Z.,':',,-V,''-,--.i-i,'',- .,''Pt'''.4 -;";---/' .r-'- -rf-:-.-.,,:-i-.;14;--.;/:-,';-.S.;',--•:'''`,.-'i?;-!" ;';'r'.'',.''': '''''''''''''''/,;., --;;:'4',.,;.','"I'' -,/'-'-'"'---";',':.,"',; '';';‘,"---'--'-'';';`.-'.''"'''''-:-',i ,'-,•;,','''''--;;;;I:'i'j,'‘,Y:',-;-.'--W,' ,f ''',"--'-'-_'-'4:''i,s''.'-P-; '''''..'„':''-i. /,'"....,,-,,,,,-2 ",... ',-.''-;'''.'.';:.,3k"-',.:qe;-'k-;.-J'''''''.'-'-'-,'-':2i:',',. .-.'' '.-'-''''' ' ';..--',-' ,, "---,-",,`,..'.''..C'''''e,-';-...''4...:_:/g,-'',-'-'.-';','':';','''V'i'-;''''`,'•.••)".z.1).-:-,:-- •'P.•,--•:'.'8:,'I.--'-.1%:•,. .'..',.",•'....i.':',,,:-•-5:.,‘,:„.:.:,--,-",•:•.- f,gfi•-,,,,,,,-.--;•,':,e..,".-i5A..,•.,.,'-',..•••-: ;"-,--•';'•„.'•rtr'..,:....-••1.„,..•,:i..-,.,..: ...1-Vr.,'ife,1•41$1.<,g,..•,,g . „„,,,,,,, , ,,,„......., ,,.„. .,,,,,, „,,,. ,.,,z„..,. „ ... ,-•. -,-• .,,.,,,......,,, ..,-,:,...,,&,,...„,-;;...,;•<,,,-,,,,.., -,..,...1,--;',• -•.,.q.es.!1:.•p-,/,•':•?., ... •••,,... . r.r,-::4 ...WA,,,17)..,,ii., 4'',.-•':•'-'.F'•!,1,•.• -::'t•-••.'"•'-'''..'•-•,'-',.>':`-•'-'i'F'" ''''-';',',.,•--'94:1-'•%144-144- -': '$)F.: •-•'•'SIT;q:t'4,,"-••.ci-:''.:1•'•,,4•;"„"i,.:::.;,,:iz'''•.•''','...'--,.•,":, ::,'',.'.". "•:-: , :•'...."'•:',2'..::-•2-'4":'1;, ;,...: : .::.=.-. ••••'4'-'•z.'''-'l';'-:':'A.4.11''',`: . '-i.si-,'',..;P;;;'%-';;;,4".t':',. 'P';,!4.4,51;''''[,j,'!.;--;:',5.;.i.'',-;2.:'' I,-. -'..-, , -,.' ---/, ;--',..';,..'. ..--:',,':.','.';' ',:- ',- -,..'1,;:.;i;,:ff:'''''-,',;'-$',4A'atl;;V:- .`' ..7-;`,-„!',:4--;`M;-. :1;'''YN.e47.';':fil'i%:!;-?:-.4',!;-.'"k0,:.Aclj-. `,:i':!';':: ',4.-,;-..-4.-!A:Si'l':'-'.,..:::-;:i.4J:- c"%g'-:;,-i:,!?3'i,Vir:t -'1,1'.':',:i•::;k"'.'-':::-:-.:1:--,':,-i-i.;•L't.':-..;'::-..-,;':-.':,:.:,..:,---f"--'."-?;';;-,=,.,:•'::::-.'.'.j2r;'''','0,-:;-';:2;,'f:','' 5,-':;`A.:':i:3"4"..e;.'il'..k.:t3V.I'A',..ViV-:(;;,-ig,:g.i,if,PiggSj.ViTa'll-,5--,W.-..fz.!,-.:?,..,.5'17,4:7..-$:'4.,i'i'50';;.4''gi: in:',.ilt, ,3',.:4:'41,4-','"I;;,*„,,,,.,,,,,4:-',?,';. ,-i'. 41:7':=:*,-,W=';•,$:,11'i;...;',1=,,VY.t.::-....','..:. .;;4,:1,=,=:=?R';'-.''.',.=."==`=;,,;•V::?:11,=•=5,-;;.-=''','7:'=',;_', ,.Z=Ngi 4.=1;=:',"=!.74.=ii,4'..,.§..!:=;=*kx.igg',=',0-='==gin'i.%=.;, =`Afi;',W=;;P.A:4=.,.;',=.k;'4%,=1:=?IdP.,,=='!-i:-;',.',?;,=V:11;';:144.',.7iii''.:=7;:ati-l';`':=4,='14=.4.4,,,;=..41?.=Y!,'..gi, '',.'i!;=Vr':-.:.'',i4=='1:=Z2 ,,it'7,1,414,f,,„'.',14._,,If.,k4'''4 '=':'i'i-=',,„H=0:5,Yg,.,ra=!9,..<44.4i,'1,=.V.=''=,.. .=:x;=;':,,=7 .;,:=Is=',-fi,', =,:1-:,,:,--,==;:zr,;!..3,,,-,-,-,....!=4%:•,{,v.. =>.-f-4.4i."=,,,,':-..c'::?.:i-if'; ;=1.4.-i's.'=:5=9.='z',:s}:?=4:-.-F-Yil':,.6:-Pz==;.='-'il\-",=,,=='..0:;:',=0,01, .....==4:4;,=-,-=-A-,i:==.4-'t:`,-;2=1,1.-,t,,:-;;;'=„,,w,=:/=;;=,',='.t.....A.',,c,;'.i.::,..:./s:c4',.=I'..,,==. ---..:,.c-=,--A,Ri•4,1;,;,;1.14),=,,,,=,y,t.f4.-:=4.wscR ,4:!===,,,,ir-514,..1-LI=12=-=.21-1,==t=1,==.';' ,=-',=2,:=,-..p.',='4=;.-.:=',.,==';v:,','',',1:(,-=:::',::`,,,=.;(:,..!..-;;;:=,43=:3,:P.,:=,===s6 -&,-,=,-=i-4:,-..,:,==::!•':-r-':7=':=',:wt===-"=,,,=,--"rx,1:-.=',',",,S',g1==:=;‘,..,,,,T-=',3';;:•= -=,;2':=-44,-1== =.c.-,====,;,,,;=::,-i-,===,-,,,,,==,==,,.;=.z,it.,?›.--!,E..,.-t==,=;:„:=7,r=== ===•;,...-=:=N',4==,.:,;.=,==.A.=1/4.==pe,Y,:....,==,..,==4-.=--;,=ii,;,.:,:=7,-*T,f4.,,,,,,,,,,,, -,,,,:;,':;-4', 4..,t,v1,-,,a,,,,T,-,:-..:.L:';..,...'-,,- -,4•`,i--:,;;,_:° :::'-',.,:1,,,f-1--,,.2-,,.,:',-,:,,,,v,inz'it.,:f:ir*<i'.'.;.;-,,Q%-•;"":',5i^.,:ti:=4- 0,4,,":”.3)-4-..,-!(',i'4,'rra'.10-•":','.:.',::--.;e.: ';'.'''11.,;,---'';'.-^,'..;:-,,'- ''',...-.;-''';''':',,..'.F.=,''-:=,'',..=.=:=-.,.'`,,:=:==''.'''.`=, -'=,.='=',"-:.==L'=",,,,-,==t's"="7"--=.4_,4 •i;7r',,,Ttt...,,,,,,....:7,-," ,:,.,,,,:;,..:.;;...,1 7,,,,,,-„:,-,:--,,,,,:•,. .,:;.,,,,...-:,,,.,:.,,,-*.,i,!!..,.,-4:,,,,,T.,,, ,15....:,,•,,,,,..;.,,,,-;;,--,,,:.;.:,;',..tp,'.s;',4..,-,;;;01,',.";:i7,7,;.,;-;;L<2,:,•,..',..:.,.ii,..',i'';',.'; ::!;.,',.;;:,:7,'',..',', ...''' ....',,-•.1-',,-....'' ',!„••" 'T., ' • ' '....','''i ''' '''. '•.'''.' .C.',.',.''' ,;,‘,-,y.,',J.':',-, 3y.-,,,....,...'„,.-,-..,-':' . . ' , ..; . RINTON } : .j'b`:50 WVION, �IVENitE N ,ORTH, EAST ._t` - "RENTON;'WA`48055 ' , . • PHONE: t11-3 206 ' -i^ r : 'J.cit4etL� 0 M 8 7: , LOWELL-:D. WELKER WILL7AIA K. 'HAMMING' . r IFhones 772-Qais .Phone: .246-4013 November 30 1979 .. . .. ., r"�¢ ' ; ; • - },.: -y Cit Council' c,,.„ c' ) - a ,. Cit of .Renton , ; ;�', Q. 1ti7 200 Mill Avenue South '°,•,'- ,,' _ •t--.>: �R�` `1;,`' " " 9 5 �f - . Renton WA: 805 vv a '° NOT ICE}OF .APPEAL. , Dear Sirs: c;' This letter is to officially appeal the decision. of `Mr..- Fred 3. Kaufman, .Land ' Use Hearing Examiner,- according to,;Title :IV, Section '30-6, It is specifically. t ' . in regards to his findings ,and conclusions of a Spec.!_al', permit,f File Number `1;:; SP-433-79 dated November ,21;' 19.79,' - .., I propose to point out':several'.:errors-:that he made, both in his findings and . a his conclusion. , I would then like to. present to you why I feel that his. decis'ion'' .• '' ', z should be overturned"'.and :the'.Special Permit" ''issued. . . . :,r, a `•- '' ' On pages 3 through ',5 ,o f,the Report, and 'Recommendation -to .the, Renton City,:;;Council '_, *',._•; - .. we find his Findings;' Conclusions ,and "Recommendations: '' '• , . ' � ,' ' . s``. - N FIDINGS: - ,3,,' i' ' , 1-7. I am in' ' complete'agreement with 'his.findings. ' h ' ' ' 8: In, paragraph 1, I am in agreement; ,.however ,paragraph' 2 is .in error. I would like to present as" exhibit "A", a letter from Mr-. Dames L. Magstadt, ' - '' Hearing Examiner, to Mr Alfred, Woods,. 'then. Pastor and President of the,. 't, . ;< First Church 'of: the Nazarne, dated April 137 ,1977.e , - sal %tiµ;h$,`. - , . ,- „-Dear Mr. Wood's:‘; . ,, , '" "z '' ` • - ' This is_to notify you that the above referenced , °' ' request, which. was:approved" subject to conditions;' - r '''' _ as' noted on the 'Examiner's.':report. of March, '29, 1977;' . . 2 has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered. final and is being .submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing.. Sincerely, ; James L. Magstadt Hearing Examiner Mr. Magstadt stated that action regarding our special permit was "Considered final", and was "being submitted to the City Clerk". . ."for permanent filing". The hearing examiner mayhave made an 'error in processing. The church was not,. nor is not,responsible that possible error. Mr. Kaufman further states that the setbacks and landscaping required by Section 4-706 (3) (a) 3 and 4 were not complied with. This, too, is an error. I would like to submit, as Exhibit !'B", 'the report of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated',March 29, 1977. On page three of that report, under CONCLUSION: • Number 3 states:' The proposed facility has met the fallowing requirements: a. Access b. Lot Coverage c. Setbacks d. Landscaping e. Parking ' f. Views g. Surface' drainage h. Provision for traffic..flow and circulation i. Esthetic compatibility with surrounding area j. Submittal of a landscape plan. FINDINGS: 0 - 9. In this finding the Hearing Examiner made an error. He states that, "the remainder of the parcel 'would' eventually be developed with single family residences." The word "might", or "could'.' should have been used since there are no intentions of development, of the easterly portion, at this time. There has been some talk about a ball field as a possibility. 10. In this finding' the Hearing Examiner states that, "the existing residence is 'proposed' to be used by the church as a parsonage". In fact, since we purchased the property, this house has been used for nothing else: Presently the minister. of Music and Youth, at the. Renton First Church of the Nazarene, a full time, paid assistant, and his family live there. The only. other possible usage of this house as a residence, would be for a custodian. 11 - 14. _ I am in agreement with the Hearing Examiner's findings. - However, the property across Union Ave. N.E. to the west is not developed residential, but in fact, it is a Public Park, namely< Kiwanis Park. 15. The building ,is to be" setback 18 feet which was determined to provide , adequate screening and landscaping next to a 'public school in 1977.. 16. The property was zoned "G" not "GS-1" as the Hearing Examiner has stated, as a result of the annexation in 1976. I would like to submit as Exhibit "C" a letter from Mayor C. 3. Delarenti, to the .King County Boundary Review Board, dated May 21, 1976. ' On page 4, Exhibit 7, Review of Chapter 36.93.170 R.C.W. AREA, ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN it states in the second paragraph: Upon annexation the area, will assume a "G" zone which is a large lot (35,000 square feet) single family holding. zone. On pages 4 and 5 of the Report and Recommendation to, the City Council, under CONCLUSIONS: the Hearing Examiner deals with the Special Permit. 6. The Hearing Examiner is in error when he states that "the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed church complies with the various •• landscaped, setback and parking requirements. I would like to submit as Exhibit "D"., the Planning Department's Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, . dated November 13, 1979. It is the annalysis of Planning Department that we do comply. As to the , parking requirements: on page. 4. (L) 3, the last half of the paragraph states: "the parking lot is still above the required 90 parking spaces. The size of the sanctuary has not changed from the original plans. Therefore, the parking required ' still remains the same, 90 parking spaces." 4 As to setbacks and landscaping the same paragraph states "The site plan complies with the other requirements as designated in Section 4-706 (3) except for the rear parking lot setback from the southern line." It is our contention that the property to the south, the Honey Dew Elementary School, is not zoned properly and is not an established single family residential area that needs to be protected from the location of .a church. The school is setback approximately 75 feet,thus providing more than adequate separation. The Hearing Examiner is in error when he applies the.100 foot setback require- r e N ment from the H6ney Dew. Elementary School. The comprehensive planrthe school site as public/quasi-public. -This point of view is supported by the Planning Departments Analysis Point.L (.2) . On page 4 (L) 2 the last sentence , reads, ". . .it 'would appear that the church now has vested interests in the site plan as approved, and the structure is a legal non-conforming structure in regard to setback." . • 7. I am in agreement with the Hearing Examiner on this conclusion; .however, the previous Hearing 'Examiner stated in Exhibit "B" page three, item 9: "The church has gone through several planning revisions and modifications in order to comply with the latest, amendment ,of the. residential zone regarding the location and siting of churches, item 10: The plans have been reviewed by all departments that are affected by the impact or construction of .this facility." On that same page (3), under Conclusions: 3, the proposed facility • has met the following requirements: a. Access • b. Lot Coverage c. Setbacks d. Landscaping • e. Parking f. Views • g. Surface drainage h. Provision for traffic :flow and circulation i. Esthetic, compatibility with surrounding area j. Submittal of a landscape plan. 8. Please note the response to-item 7, since this conclusion is repetitive. 9. The Hearing Examiner is in error on this. conclusion. Since there is no plan for development of the eastern (internal) portion -of the site and since the Planning Department in their report, Exhibit "D", page 5 (L) 6 which states: "Many large significant evergreen and deciduous trees exist on the property line. - Retention 'of the trees should be encouraged as part of the total landscape and development plan." This conclusion is, irrelevant to the Special Permit. 10. The Hearing Examiner is in error,• when he states that the property is "too narrow to support the construction of the proposed church." As shown in other parts of this appeal, the, previous Hearing Examiner ruled that the property was not too narrow. In Exhibit "C", the letter from Mayor C. 3. Delarenti, to the King County Boundary Review Board, dated May. 21, 1976, on page 3, Exhibit 2, Background Information states: "The Woods Annexation was initiated by Pastor Woods, of the Nazarene Church to be able to construct , a church." Obviously, prior to annexation into the city, the city was aware of our intention. I can further document,City Council minutes and corre- spondence between the city and the King County Council if necessary, but why belabor the point. 11. The Hearing Examiner :isstill in error on this item, please patiently note the facts that I have previously given to you on this repetitive item. 12. The Hearing Examiner is in error here as well, because I have shown - that he is in error not once, but on several items. Therefore, I appeal his decision that the Special ,Permit should be denied. WHY 'I BELIEVE THAT -THE SPECIAL PERMIT SHOULD BE. ISSUED Tn August of 1942, the Church of the Nazarene came to the City of Renton. As the congregation grew the church built at 246 Wells Ave. North. Through the years the congregation continued to grow, until it had outgrown its facilities which covered more than 80% of its land. No adjacent property has been available to us, nor is it now. Since we are on the corner of two one-way streets, 3rd North and Wells Ave. North, coupled• with the fact that we have no off street parking, both internal growth, 6 as well as service to our community became restricted. We need to relocate. When the property immediatly north of the Honey Dew Elementary School became available the church purchased it. Shortly thereafter we applied for annexation to the City of Renton for the express purpose of building a church building, Under Ordinance 3058, passed August 23, 1976, Published August 27, 1976 and became effective 5 days later on September 1, 1976 the property at 850-856 Union Ave. N.E. became a part of the City of Renton. Some 6.months prior to annexation in a letter dated March 11, 1976, Exhibit "E", Mr. Warren C. Gonnason, 'P.E. wrote the Church of the Nazarene regarding "Sewer Service to the New Church Site." The church sought out a designer who designed a "steel building". It was 100 feet wide, 192 feet deep, and .2.2. feet high with a flat roof. Apparently, because they had chosen a rectangular steel building, which would have definite esthetic limitations, they requested a 300 foot set back from Union Ave. N.E. Had the church applied for a 150 foot setback, approximently even with the Honey Dew School, we would not be writing this appeal. On March 29, 1977 the Hearing Examiner approved a special permit for church facilities on the site (reference file SP-003-77) . There was NO opposition from the community or anyone else. , After 2 years of design work, the church board,' of'.the Renton First Church of the Nazarene, was not satisfied with the structure that we had taken the Special Permit out to build. We became aware of factors that relate to steel structures that we did not have before. . We went and looked at a church building in Lynnwood, Washington, that is in fact, a Steel Building. Our conclusion,was that the community would not be satisfied with this kind of structure. It looked like a .warehouse or a heavy equipment garage, not a :house of worship. We further discovered that we could: build a beautiful house of worship, out of conventional materials, that would be a tribute to our community, that we are trying to minister to, a tribute to God-Almighty, and one ` 7 that we would be pleased to say "that's where I worship", for about the same amount of money. We completely redesigned the appearance of. the building to one that we believe, will enhance the neighborhood. We showed the drawings to some of our neighbors, who were more than pleased. On August 23, 1979, I wrote to the Office of Land Use Hearing. Examiner, Exhibit "F" & "G", to see if simply moving the building forward on the property; to have instead of a 300 foot setback from Union Ave. N.E. , a 150 foot setback (the requirement from Union Ave. N.E. is not more than 25 feet. ) ; would violate the intent of the first Special Permit. He never wrote me back, nor called me on the telephone. He verbalized to the Planning Department of the City of Renton, that since we were in a "C" zone we would NOT qualify for a Special Permit in a residentual zone- as the code states. Upon this advise.we applied for a Rezone from "G" to • "SR-1" and applied for a new Special Permit, only to have the rezone granted and the Special Permit denied. Again there was NO opposition to either the rezone or the Special Permit, We have chosen to build our building in three phases. Phase One which consists of an administrative wing, a large fireplace room, a multi-purpose activity center which includes a full size gymnasium, a kitchen, showers and lockerrooms, electrical and mechanical rooms,4.restrooms including providing for the handicapped. On November 5, 1979 a building permit was issued, because Phase One comes completely within the confines of the Special Permit, SP-003-77. Our foundation for Phase One is complete. It is our desire that you will grant to us this Special Permit so that we can build Phases Two and Three. Phase Two includes the covered driveway, the foyer, and the main restrooms. Phase Three includes the sanctuary and classrooms. We have done everything that we know to do to comply with the codes and 8 regulations of the City of Renton. I appe31 to you, the elected officials of our community, to exercise reason and sound Judgement and grant to the Renton First Church of the Nazarene Special Permit SP-433-79 A sincere thank you for your consideration in this matter. Lowell Welker, Pastor-President o i • THE CITY OF RENTON C.) vd�: r Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH 98055 O1 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOH 0 LAND USE HEARING EXAM`'NER 2 4 � 0 DAMES L MAGSTADT , 235 - 259 4 (O SEP1 -'. • • • April 13 , 1977 Mr . Alfred Woods RE : File No. SP-003-77 President , First Church of the Nazarene 246 N. Wells Renton, -WA 98055 Dear Mr. Woods : This is to notify you that the above ',referenced request , which was approved subject to c6ncliti.'ons as noted on the Examiner ' s report of March 29 , 1977 , has not •been appealed within. the time period set by ordinance , and therefore, - _.,y. �1�;Ghf:`ab!,x�'��:r ��1� i- jrf,i!`. •�6,�":..rJ�i%r' ".Q..�'�.� ��'��:,M+M rl`";��,., x^'. -''k: ';•�+;,`- ?:,.j,kG! ,r,'ib k'.`'ur ::i:%xr`irri'�"',h+(:". 1a`,.'r='S ':r.«v'"`;,:y yj x„�: _ s._aa'+:.5eni• m`- 'o ri' ;�+�., r.� YY v ti' 0 ,y` p d e_ u nz 4fi J.�Y' .TT. 1 ;M�� x'Iv,� ', • b�S ..'Y...�r.A:;� .... :J":r;•.1:,.. .`w'y:`^ .-.a ..'7:'v.,- .us'k� i. ..- .- ,. '. Sincerely , • • . ../// l' c." e C Jan:Cs L. ;dace stadt Ilcari.ng Examiner J LM :m g cc : / De1 Mead , City Clerk March 29 , 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING. EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, • APPLICANT: First Church of FILE NO. SP-003-77 the Nazarene • LOCATION: Just north of Honey Dew Elementary School on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a special permit to allow construction of a proposed church facility in a single family residential zone. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Recommend approval RECOMMENDATION: subject to conditions. Hearing Examiner: Recommend approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on March 15, 1977 . • • PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report , examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on March 22 , 1977 , at 10 :25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. , Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and Mr . Alfred Woods , representing the applicant , had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . • Michael Smith, Planning Department , reviewed Exhibit #1 , and- entered the following addition"al exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Site Plan Map. Exhibit #3 : Landscape Plan. Exhibit #4 : Elevation Plan. The Examiner inquired about access to the undeveloped portion of the property for future expansion. Mr . Smith reported that access would be through the westerly portion of the site. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if he had additional comments or exhibits to enter . Mr . Smith reported receiving letters from various city departments : Fire Department, Engineering Division , and Utilities Division; and read the subject letters into the record. The Examiner asked Mr. Woods if he concurred in Exhibit #1 , and Mr . Woods indicated his concurrence. Responding was : Mr. Alfred Woods r President, First Church of the Nazarene 246 North Wells Renton, WA 98055 SP-003-77 Page Two ' Mr. Woods asked for clarification of Item P. 7 , of Exhibit #1 , which ' disallows the use of exterior loudspeakers , and asked if the estr .ction includes chimes , etc. -Mr. Smith indicated that the item referred e eferred to loudspeakers only. Mr, Woods briefly reviewed: the history of acquisition of the property , includina a recent annexation, and- indicated cooperation in fulfilling obligations imposed by the Planning Department in order to construct . the facility. ' In regards to •previous discussion about access to the undeveloped portion of the property, Mr; Woods reported that. ingress and egress for the proposed facility would be Onto ,Union Avenue N.E . with proposed access for future expansion to be negotiated with property owners to the back of the property. He indicated discussions had been held with said property owners .in regard to future - access. the Examiner asked if existing trees on the property would be ' retained , and Mr. WOods indicated that one tree would remain but the other would be removed because of the placement of the structure on the site; . . The Examiner asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Since there was none , .the hearing on Item #SP-Q03-77- was closed by the Examiner at 10: 50 a.m. FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS : Having reviewed the record inthis matter , 'the Examiner' now makes 'and enters the following.: FINDINGS ; ' 1 . The request is. to allow the construction of a proposed church . , facility by special permit in' a single family residential zone. The chinch and accompanying parking will consist of an area of approximately 24 , 000 gross square feet. , 2 . The subject site is primarily undeveloped; however, there are i two existing single family residential structures located on the 1 property with various, accessory structures. ' Honey Dew Elementary School and its accompanying playground is located directly to the south of the site. There are. single family residences located to the north of the site, and Kiwanis Park is located directly west • fronting Union Avenue N .E. . 3 . All existing utilities are available and are in close proximity . 4 . Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, R.C.W'. 43 . 21 .c , a Declaration of Non--Signif.icance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official.. 5 . The structure is .compatible with required setbacks , lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-706 . 3 . . ; (L6 . L--in. pi net as is indicated on the submitted plan is in compliance with the code and seems to be sufficient to 'provide an adequate buffer at the perimeter of the property to minimize adverse impacts . . In reviewing the ' landscape plan, the Planning Department has suggested several modifications regarding material types ; sizes , aryl location. . • The property was advertised and was posted in three conspicuous . places near the subject site. There is no apparent opposition to the proposed church, . • • ' 1 • I SP-003-77 Page Three 9 . The church has gone through several planning revisions and modifications in order to comply with the latest amendment of the residential zone regarding the location and siting of churches. 10 . The plans have been reviewed by all the departments that are affected by the impact or construction of this facility. • 11. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues , findings of fact, applicable policies and provisions , and departmental recommendations in this matter, and this report itself , being uncontested, is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and , incorporated into this report by reference as set forth in full herein. CONCLUSIONS : • 1 . The applicant indicated that he had reviewed the Planning Department staff - report and has concurred with staff ' s recommendations. The Examiner has reviewed and concurs with the acceptance of the design; and approves the location, and finds. that the proposed use is in compliance with all provisions , regulations , and standards as set forth in Ordinance No. 3050. ' 2 . After a thorough examination, it is the conclusion of the Hearing Examiner that the church and its incidental activities will not be unduly detrimental to adjacent or surrounding properties or the enjoyment thereof. the: follow °re. reams:,* 13`;• -:The pr-oposed.;�f-ac� �:' :`t,. `h• ._ _ . . - ., .. �.9'�' .,. ,;q?` ._.=. �. .. a. Access b. Lot coverage c. Setbacks • d. Landscaping Parking f. Views • g.• Surface drainage • h. Provision for traffic flow and circulation i,. Esthetic compatibility with surrounding area ::3;,•, Submittal of a landscape plan 4 . After examining the application, the Fire Department has concluded that two additional fire hydrants will be required to be installed by the applicant. • 5 . The proposal meets the objectives of the Land Use Report, 1965 , Pages 17 and 18, Objectives, as officially adopted by the City of Renton . • - RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval subject to the Planning Department recommendations , Items 1 through 8 , and the additional installation of two fire hydrants as specified by the City of Renton Fire Department. ORDERED THIS 29th day of March, 1977 . • • .41 Ames L.; agstadt Land U Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of March, 1977 by certified mail to the parties of record: Alfred Woods • • • SP-003-77 Page Four TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of March, 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton- Record-Chronicle • Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071, Section 4-3015, request for . reconsideration or notice Of appeal must be filed in writing on or. before April 5 , 1977 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the. decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set • forth the specific errors relied upon by such .appellant, and the Examiner may, -after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. , • c .0- 14 .,)\ . ruiIhi .CITY OF RENTON `• 0i J' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL'AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 . - ..:* rn J. DELAl1RENTl MAYOR o " y CFIARLES , • /A (O �4 0C May 21 , 19'i6 4Tfa SEP1k- King County Boundary Review Board • . ' . King County Courthouse • Seattle , Washington 98104 REGAlil)ING : Notice ..:t Intention Woods AnneX.tt1011 , 6enticmk-:a : As required by Clldptol. 3t, . `).i e; t Ott' Revised Code of Washington, a Notice of Intention is hereby di,,ven by the City of Renton to annex • by the petition method the territory generally referred to as the "Woods Annexation. " This area 1 i esJ contiguous to the eastern • , cor por at •: limits of the City of Renton east. of Union Avenue N:E . ' ( 132nd Avenue S.K. ) and west of 138th Avenue S .K . contiguous to ' the fone'ydcw Elementary School . . The City of Renton herewith transmits the following exhibits to assist the Board in its consideration of the proposed annexation. It is understood • that the board will furnish copies of the Notice at intention (attached) to the :;t.ate Department of Ecology , State Department_ of Social ;',.nd Health Servides and ,King County as ' • :.e qui roa by state law . '. The items submitted are numbered in accord-, 31:c'C' with the listing below : * Exhibit 1 : . A deser ipt.idn , of the proposed action with special attention given to Chapter 35A. 14 . 120 . • through 35A . 1.1-. 150 of the Revised Code of . brawl: ine1Ion . * t.xhi :,it 2 : A hriel' nt.itement- r egard.irig the background ' and reasons for seeking the annexation with supporting ' documentation, , • * Exhibit 3 : A legal description of the boundaries of' the . proposed . annexation . ** Exhibit 4 : A King' County Assessor ' s map illustrating Renton ' :; corporate limits in that vicinity, the propose0 annexation and the number of, . acres in t.he' pl't)1?O:iE'_d ,annexation (not included in this report) . `' =r 4- ';, r s • ,. , . King County • Bound'a.ry Review Board r? i May 21, 1976 ''' : ' 1 Page Two I * Exhibit 5 : Vicinity, maps showing the following special ' district's; water, sewer, ,and, fire. , . . * Exhibit 6 : A map illustrating the current municipal boundaries with 'the proposed annexation. * Exhibit. 7: A review. of factors as stated in RCW ' ' 36 .93 .170 as they, relate to .the_ proposed, annexation.. - . , _ - . * Exhibit 8 : A review of the effect of -the proposed annex- . ation as related- to the objectives set forth by the , Boundary Review Board in RCW 36 .93 .180 . ' ` *** Exhibit 9: . The required $25 filing fee (RCW 36 .93 , as • ' amended by Chapter 3 , Laws of 1969 , • Extra- - ordinary Session)., • not' included in this report. • iNotice process, and- other communications regarding this proposed . ; annexation should be directed to: C . J. Delaurenti , Mayor - City of Renton ' Municipal Building Renton., Washington 9805.5 , and to the fallowing ' addi.tional persons, governmental units ; and- private service companies : ` . ' Gordon Y. Ericksen Water District 90- - : Planning Director , City of Renton Fire District 2-5 ' Jim' s Disposal, inc .- - . Pastor Al Woods 1201 Lind Avenue S.W. .246 Wells Avenue North ' Renton, Washington 980.55 Renton, Washington 9805S Should the board "members desire additional information to assist - ' tin the review process, please contact the planning department. • ' ' Sincerely,.' •' , , ' , (2', ,'-.1 ,. j., „., 4 ,:---)t_..},7.7. . . . i , . . . , , _ . - , C . .. Delaurenti, • _ , • j M yor. j ' * 23 copies .** • 5 copies *** 1 copy - . . . Attachments . f EXHIBIT 1 Description of Proposed Action The City of Renton proposes the annexation by the. petition method of land area contiguous to the present incorporated limits: of the. city under those applicable provisions of Chapter 35A. 14 Revised Code_ of Washington •(RCW) with specific reference to Chapter 35A. 14: 1.2.0 through 35A14 . 150. The Notice of .Intention is. filed with the Boundary Review Board under the provisions '`of''_Chapter. 35. 93.090 RCW and Chapter 36 . 93. 130 RCW and other specific sections relating to information to be considered by the Board . • EXHIBIT 2 Background Information - q4Gs`"�S^�`F.,[.?', :'.�� 1A•-r:,n+=, ^ i,.ir•. r+qh,?..,r��:°s'^:>;�v°'y.n:c ?Y.:,�, ��U,2�^X•::, ■gyp (J,, �,1' ,f s... r"i�;"},,,�;A�',.. ,.,.��..mq `-'� r. Jm,�'..�,,�}►$'yr-nr',P ' �`;�`��.;: Y ? ., . ��'M1` 'If• ..r ,y�T2 q tk •'1#.l t :f z,{'" : tx.1 �±F'7X,s , .. ,,•ab ' mot` _ ,r •ytx•„T .+ �Y},s.P:{3 _.'Y,D�., �;'�,'iJ� a.. •. g .i��; E v eho u g h there' is a`• sani tary' sewer -line- 'in- 'frond of the church property that the city would permit him to connect to , the church prefers ..: to be in the city. The two other property owners want to be in the city in order to obtain basic utilities , especially sanitary sewers to be able to develop ,at urban densities . . The percolation in this general area is very poor so sanitary sewers are necessary to develop. Without municipal utilities there is a question whether any further development would be allowed at anything approaching suburban densities . All of the property owners favored annexation and signed the , annexation petition . The Letter of Intent was presented to the City Council on February 9 , 1976 (minutes attached) and a meeting was established for February 23 , 1976 (minutes attached ) . At that public hearing the council voted to accept the Letter of Intent , established conditions and authorized the circulation of the annexation petition . The petition was circulated and pre- sented to the City Council on March 15 , 1'976 (minutes attached ) at which a public hearing was established for April 12 , 1976 (minutes attached ) . At that public hearing the council. accepted . ' . the annexation petition and authorized the Notice of Intention be prepared for the King County Boundary Review Board . EXHIBIT7 '/ A Review of Chapter• 36 . 93 . 170 R. C .W.. AREA ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN . • . • The proposed Woods Annexation is about 15 . 3 acres in area The King County Comprehensive Plan designates the, area, as single family residential and it is presently. zoned `S-R . The city ' s comprehensive. plan designates the an.nexation. as single family. residential : '�i'i"��+,..yyy��AA�yy ��' .,�:i u.cxt �"vsF7 § .. .. . ' :�UYt '.7s.„'il► '. 4 -. ? .'e.,'s:sty:,,-�}`at:i.,[°:> al }„'rev X,..1*�(� Y;?§, ;.• �'►"" ----.. AV f �(�,r,, -�L »�µ 1 .'h';.• ,�!.:F,r,;�..z.::'":„ri.s:`'ik'k, - , - , k' KF-_y�-^w� 6:t,, 4 r 914"*S Y. ,.'s` +'IC.�ygg ` at.; "�". .W,!.'Y of ,; �k��(�n•.�i+�•�'3. (� ._��-7-�.h,,.4`:tF':�i��'� .C. .'4 'f. �. �fAq.i, ,"�.'�/.�� x,4��-.`{� � ''�x��o', ,q- .t•.0.:.�'i-r-'J°- , 4 t r2. '.- "•f a._ r4.ift*tIPapt ••'S F.f e',`.e`.'-fin •- �" �"Y� �;;..,�.:,v,iv'-<.n� , �f.a.r, �' 3�" ¢ j � .Fy i �t1's}} •o- A'I.• � �y''xfic��,`` • . '-'1 n{ ,tQj.s,, ..rrv<\s +*� S a,S)e ,o il�,i'S{. [G{Fj� ,p-- ,�'<` s Syr M:'Sif',}` '"+., ,^Gt', Y�x•- _?M.�S;2�R�� C'A+pj,�� } .�� ` ��514�4� \,...� 4� �1� ,.t �.� . :Y L..n - approved ,i �,�,...�. _�.:..�.rz....�.. : ;�;,k:�.,:!.. 4:. - F o r a rezone" t o�b e it 'woul'd have to ," among of er"things , conform to. the comprehensive plan ; -Any 'e'xi'sting use 'that is not consistent with the Renton 'zoning ordinance would ' be given 'a non-conforming status and could remain until_ the use'' is abandoned ,' provided there is no health or safety' hazard . ' LAND POPULATION AND GROWTH POTENTIAL . • There are four single family dwelling units at the in the proposed annexation . This 'calculates to betweenent l0 ande15 people in the. annexation . Two units are in the western portion and the remaining two units are' i'n the eastern portion . . A church is proposed to be constructed in the western portiOn acres ) of the annexation. Assuming that the eastern' portion (8. 9 acres ), is developed as a subdivision 'of 4 . 5 units per acre there would be approximately 26 units constructed in addition to the two presently there for a total of 28 units . Assuming that there are 3. 2 people per unit (this fugure has been found in annexations in this portion of the city) , of the eastern the eventual population portion would be 85 to 90 people . It is' not known whether the two units in the western portion will be retained when the church is, constructed . ' NATURAL FEATURES The annexation is relatively flat varying about 30 feet in elev and slopes to the west toward the citybein ar drainage basin . According to the 1973 "Soil Survey": bye thCedareU. SRi ever Soil Conservation Service , .the area has Alderwood soil which has ? severe limitations for on-site sanitary sewer systems . - BOUNDARIES s . The boundaries of the annexation consist of the city limits (Union Avenue N . E. which is a street) on the west ; property lines on the north ; 138th Avenue . S . E . on the east ; and property lines and city limits on the south . It is anticipated that this_ is an interim annexation and the boundaries will change . In- fact there has been an annexation initiated .for the c-ontiguous land to the south . PROXIMITY TO POPULATED AREAS ' • The annexation is located contiguous to the City of Renton and is inrapl growi ng- portion of King County. There are several that subdivision y ( Honeydew, President Park , Brentwood , etc . ) ' • have a density of four to five 'housing units per gross acre . • The annexation is oriented socially and economically to the • City of. Renton . The city was certified by the state as having 27 ,334 people in 1975 . • • • • • _ _ .ice:�.�M1..►»�,.. • .. . , . . Ex;4 !;4 D _ • PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ' . . . PUBLIC HEARING . . NOVEMBER 13, 1979 • APPLICANT: FIRST CHURCH OF. THE .NAZARENE FILE NUMBERS : R-434-79 and SP-433-79 • A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE -OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to SR-1 and a special permit to allow expansion of a church and ' associated educational facilities. . B . GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record : • RENTON FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE 2 . Applicant : RENTON FIRST CHURCH OF . . THE NAZARENE 3. Location : • ' Vicinity of 850 Union (Vicinity map attached) Avenue N.E. , just north • of Honeydew Elementary . School on the east side • of Union Avenue N.E. 4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal descrip- . tion is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . . • 5. Size of Property : ±6 . 5 acres. • 6 . Access : Via Union Avenue N.E . 7. E-;isting Zoning : "G" , General Classification • District , minimum lot size ' 35 ,000 square feet . 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area: •S-1, Residence Single Family , minimum lot size 40,000 square feet ; G, General Classifica- tion District , GS-1, General . • Classification District , mini- mum lot size 35 ,000 square feet . • 9 , Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential . 10. Notification.: The applicant was notified . in writing of the hearing date : notice was properly ' published in the Record ' Chronicle on October 19 , 1979 , and posted in three places on or near the site . as required by City ordinance on October 18, 1979 . . C.. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 3058 dated August 24 , 1976, at which time the present zoning classi- fication was applied. On March 29 , 1977, the Hearing Examiner approved a special permit for church facilities on the site ( reference file SP-003-77) . A building permit was issued on November 5 , 1979, for (Tap phase of the church construction. PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ . . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING ,EXAMINE.I't 4z:i.;. r' FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZAR.ENE REZONE/SPECTAL PERMIT ',' NOVEMBER 13 , 1979 PAGE TWO . U. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: . 1. Topography : The site is generally level.o 2. Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, ,6-15% slopes: (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil , . is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops, and for . urban development . . 3. Vegetation : The bulk of the subject site has been cleared but mixed stands of deciduous and conifer trees line the perimeter. ' Wildlife : The existing vegetation does provide some h• abitat for birds • and small mammals. 5. Water : No water was observed on the subject site (October 17, 1979) . 6. Land Use: The subject site is primarily undeveloped. . However, one existing single family residence is located on the property together with various accessory structures. Honeydew Elementary School is . located directly to the south of the subject site. There are existing single family residences located north of the site and west of the site across Union Avenue N'.E. Kiwanis Park is .located north and west of the subject site across Union Avenue N. E . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :. • • The surrounding properties are primarily single family resi- denti_al with some mixed public/quasi,-public uses . F. PUBLIC SERVICES : � . 1. Water and Sewer : A 12" water main and 15" storm sewer run north-south on Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the • subject site , while an 8" sanitary sewer extends east- west on N.E. 10th Street within 700 feet to the north • of the property . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements 3. Transit : Metro Transit Routes 107 and 108 operate along . Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site . • 4. Schools: The Honeydew Elementary School is adjacent to the subject site on the south, while McKnight Middle School is approximately 1* miles to the northwest , and Hazen High School is within 3/4 of a mile to the north- east . 5. Recreation: The grounds of the Honeydew Elementary- School and Kiwanis Park provide good opportunities for nearby recreation. • G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS . OF THE ZONING CODE : 1. Section 4--729 , ' ' G, General Classification District 2 . Section 4-704 , SR-1, Suburban Residence District 3. Section 4-700( 3) , Churches by Special Permit • . . •. - . .. . ,,.. , • ,. . . . . . , . • . • , - '".;YI.ft: ' .: f, . . • „,', . re:AANV .. - • . ,';.MC.sii3. ., . . . . . • . . . , .. . -. , .. , . . .PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' - ' • e • ' • ' . e .. . - . • . . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING. EXAMINER • ' . .. . . ., FIRST CHURCWOF THEN.A4ARENE:RWNE/SPECIALePERMIT e . • e, .. . NOVEMBER 13, ! 1979 • -• . . . , e ..'.. . , . . PAGE THREE . . , . .. . . . . • e _ . . . . , , --. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF 'THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER. . ' • • .., OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : r - ' e - ' . • . .• .„ . . . . • - . . . - , • . .. . _ . 1. Comprehensive: Plan, Land Ue Report ,. 1965,. Objectives, .- pen;es i7 an. . ' , : -, ' - . • . - . . . . _. . . . . , , ,. - - . . .. • • - . .. . .. .. . . . I . IMPACT- ON THE NATURAL OR 'HUMAN' ENVIRONMENT: . • . , , . . . . 1. Natural SysteMs : Rezone_ of the Subject site will not have . . . a direct imPact -on the -property. However , subsequent devel- opment will remove the soils, disturbing the vegetation . increase Storm Water' runoff, ' and have an effect on traffic • e... ., I and noise level in the area. ' Through proper development .. controls and .procedures, . however, many of these impacts can be mitigated. • : , - ' - _ ' . • • . . . . . . . . . . 2. Population/Employment.: Not applicable. . . e . . . .. . • 1 3. Schools: _ Not applicable. ' . . . - . •• 1 4. Social : Development, ofthe subject site as a church will . ,. • proVide increased opportunity for socialinteraction • . . • . Within the area congregation.' . .. , , . . • . . . , . . -.. - 5. Traffic : Data on nvexage. daily trips (ADT' s). is 'not . .•: . available for churches :from the Traffic Engineering Divi- sion. Therefore, given an estimate of two trips/week/ : e 1 • parking space-, a total of 180 trips/week would .result • .. . . ' (based on 90 required stalls) .e ' It should.be noted,. how- - , • ever, that' . these' will all occur at the same time. : . . .., . . • . • _ I 1 . . . . • J. ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: ! . . . . . . • . . Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and . . the State Environmental Policy At of 1972 , as amended, Rcw . . 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance 'has been issued for the subject proposals (see attached) . . . . . .. . • . L K. AGENC1ES /DEPARTMENTS' CONTACTED: . . . . . . . . . . . . , .. • . . . ,. . . . 1 . city of Renton 'Minding. Division . . , , . _ . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Diyisien . _ , ._. . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division , . , • 4. City of Renton. Utilities Division • 5, City of Renton Fire Pepartment , -- . • . ' 6 . City of Renton Police Department 7 , City of Renton Parks and Rebreat ion Department . . . . , L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - REZONE : • , ,. . . ., . .1. The proposed rezone from G to SRel is consistent with' the land Use element of. the Comprehensive Plane 'Which desig- , . , nates the site and surrounding area 4s single family resi-dential ,, . . . . • . 2. The subject Site was annexed in 1976. Since that time , no area-wide or Site rezoning requests have been considered -on thesite . . • , . , . . • . .. 3: Items 1. and 2 appear to comply with Section 4-3014 of the 1. . Renton- Municipal Code,, thus substantiating the proposed . . . . • . rezone. ., . . • • . . _ , . • , . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: - . • .. . . .. . Approval of the requested rezone from G to SR-1 based upon the ' ' compatibility of .the proposed use with existing uses .and the : - fact that the site. has not been previously considered by an . . area-wide zoning review, and being consistent. with the Compre- .. hensdve Plan land,' use element ,clesignation .of single family I • . .. , . .. . . . .. . „ , _ , • , . . . . . . - . _ , . • . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT .,Y:i,,..�',_ PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER rf^' FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT 4'Y . k - NOVEiMBER 13 , 1979 PAGE FOUR L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - SPECIAL PERMIT:T: 1. In ,March, of 1977 , the Renton First Church of the Nazarene ' obtained a special permit from the' IIea.ring Examiner to construct a church on a site just north of the. .Honeydew Elementary School on Union Avenue N.E. The special permit allowed for a church of approximately 20 , 000 squire feet set back approximately 300 feet from Union Avenue n.E. and 100 feet from the northern property line . The appli- cant has modified the; .t plans by upgrading the quality of tilo exterior treatment of the bUilding, moving the struc- ture forward approximately 150 feet and increasing the structure e by 6 , 800 square feet to allow a full sized gymnasium. V 2. In- the original review in 1977, it appears that several points may have not been adequately addressed. First , a minimum of a 100 foot setback is required, from any other developed lot which is zoned residential . The Honeydew Elementary School site to the south is zoned GS-1. The property was annexed in July ,of 1959 and given a GS•-i zoning classification , even though the school was pre-existing on the site. 'In 1965, the Comprehensive Plan designated the site into a Public/Quasi-Public Land Use Classification. The site was 'never rezoned to P-1 because there was never any reason to. The school was already existing. The G zone is still a residential zone. However,. _.. _ >s ;;; not`r-develo :e,d�;'.:wit,h:;,�„e c e.nc, r �:i� t,h: �' a�'t"'i�c�lar: ca e ,.�- _ „�.,, .�. i.�., 9 :}.. t4.. ..�� nt ti,:._l'r^ f'j» uf�' s�M"� .:.\n„`:; •,1,�„�;'�x�'-`i'r.s ,��, T "�c.�„ :e,:i 1 ,.a" '?�"}: �i'P.. .�t:%ftn: �If;�.�.F''�:':--a <�'i � 'U::i�s.,, i'." t ,r <"C"yC'':� ...y,°r:i;j`.1^rS`. :.r::t;�"!.;J Yvy:}� m � r�.,a;,?.3na.' '.i��`tu':i .t"., '$�Sn�"W,� .�a� 'e,,..,.t J,� t;C ..;'ui r,r.rt .r.,�$ r �. �'�y'�°r . ., ,"t"l�;:r rx r(M , », . , .u.r.�.d,:: :"•9:+�..-»:.y. .,'�,s � �s=' ;�.r�;:"d� .1.:�,ii _. ,. !»;;�,. '"a!<�r, '4�` ,t ,,y.�,,..�,._. �._ ,!� ofµr�the'>>f=Pl�an�n� .n .:, e `atr;tme'4 � s�>..� _,,.;a::•', :.. , --- Secondly, the Hearing Examiner in 1977 approved the build- ing location only 18 feet from the southern property line. Section 4-700( 3)( a)4. requires a 25-foOt landscaping strip along all pr- ope:rty lines. It would appear that this is a code requirement that the Hearing Examiner may not have had the authority to modify. However, a building permit. has been issued on the site for yp � : •� i :.;C2y s tith e c ovnstr on of a church as originally allowed , and wouldape ta# he 0", h`.n9w :h-.. s . e ed�' r teretst*V,:: '! c,14* I YFO a 1a4 �artriiteot�stuire/� legal tnri� rlfrtiam� : �t + : ti�� -i�'? . , �� Ayi3 ::ivr5',5, ` W, 1 ,' '� ;��.�w .;y,; _;t i.., , t;r.,i: ...;::,' ::i,.. V4;:1,1 xo 11 l egaTg lose aeniiX 3 it.re ,;,p-t:e',<.w<:;l�afl. oom ..l: :es=w' -th' Vtrhe; o:t:h•0' ' =r`e,,_u genie;y�lr�ts,„as • :fir: p. .k:� ^ x ,,-e,4P,, , -;::f'i r-]:. I�'_ "�Y'.' 5:"� .2:�>,�••�A +k� i.1� _ f'.','7'C•�'1:•5:�_::- r-'f-'—' ` � ''J-1- .- e. :�- °o e -:rear. eking �`r>cIG'if,,- ,_r�,,crys„�;,,,;:�.:1i-c, .:r'�a .,i4� :ir: `'rk':#v'!.,,.S.,r.,�y; !F6,,;•r�'s;:.,,.� r.�,:,.r,.,.:.`� �.Ic �}-..�..ti�•._. , 'dot7,, ,sh, o,: wt� e s,:' ernt:��pr,ope,rt ��l e� . �`rt ' i`1 ve ,.: si�t:�-a:c��.. ;�r ��:.. ,�:...'�,,a . . .. ,. :, ,.•n tb be ,.yet back :2 feet instead of the- IS-feet shown. This will reduce the parking by 4 Ioweverrh e. :pa^kn ag � 3 n ) .re re -90' :r n: spaces ." T e s e J' : C ) a �ha $ t; c taWe romt"e • o , 3a , pa s . . . , - n y irdstllai' shesae : JQ`'p'akh`g, ;: pee :' :t. n 4. The church construction has been divided into three phases . Phase 1 is presently under construction. It is composed of the multi-purpose room/gymnasium. It complies totally with the special' pe'rniit 'issued in 1977. Phases 2 and 3 include the sanctuary and the foyer. These are intended - to be extended to the west of the original building site. The structure' was moved to the west because the exterior treatment of the building was upgraded to cedar finish instead of metal and to allow better' access for fire fighting. ' es PLANNING DEPARTMENT ; '''.' ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER • ' ' . ' FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT . NOVEMBER 13, 197a , ' PAGE FIVE 5. A revised landscape 'pla.n has , not been submitted. However, _care should betaken tb insure that proper screening ' is • . required to reduce the Visual. impact . The church has been set back the same distance from Union Avenue N.T. as the Honeydew 111ei1ieritai'y School .to be compatible le with the school instead of dominating- that side of the street '. 6 . Many large significant evergreen and deciduous trees exist on the site 'from .-the house eastward to the property line , • Retention of the trees should be encouraged as part of the total landscape and development plan . • 7. A screen fence was suggested .as a possible addition along, . . the northerly landscape strip;., however, propery landscape ' ' ink; will. -be. more effective than a fence. _ . ' M.' DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: : ' . ' Approval of the requested special permit , file number SP-433-79, subject to the following conditions : • 1. Revision of the landscaping; strip on the southern .boundary' ' of the rear parking to a width of 25 feet.. 2 • Final Planning Department approval of detailed 'landscape • plans including the revisiohs noted in "L!' and • the retention of existing trees wherever possible. • Removal of trees shall be subject to prior approval of. - the -Renton Planning Department in accordance with detailed landscape plans. . . 3. Final Planning Department approval of screening methods . along the north and south property lines. 4 . Posting. of a bond or other approved means of insuring . proper landscG ping installation andmaintenance as per • ordinance requirements . 5 . Parking lot lighting shall be of low height and intensity . to reduce glare and light intrusion to adjacent single family residence, - . 6 . Exterior loud speakers shall be permitted , ' 7, The portion of the site not- developed at this time shall be retained in • its natural state , ,and any future plans • for this area shall be approved by the Exanuner. . ' The purpose of these requirements is to reduce the impact of the ' pr.oposed development iii the adjacent single family residences and retain tile. general character of the area, • • r11 +.{w•a P .,,..�. ,q,;., as A ..:,�^. , ' ,l 4i„�;�" . +fY.••i.'9 • tn,V $rrtT1, tA�+*3 pp i - 1 _J�ro'1••^b .. k9:'i''�t ,� • �'' ...•y.' � • i )Else '6=.AR:Y .3 1 !';a}•x . , (Y (( y .. t{, ti °,.`.'tea. `l:t�.i.✓i.... ti ' ,.• . • w I{...i+:,:5 �^ «' t'Nfi - _ 'F + � ',r .- rhm q� 3�/ 1 :•',',,:.t��..,. ,.... • 9�` fa f "_i ce'' a p t,,,,,X4 - 'x "•.,!, ,x.....5. ..•<..• 4 �;, g ` to .,.... . I. :':, d ,, 1 C, id...... .,.,,, VAS ~CY'C- >+•?•,f y� °'» �1,,"d'- - , ..' 4 '�d; `" 1.e •y l'. , :r+_.,... ,.,...„,„.,.......„.., . _a ...h m-'.xn. s_..a,•••-, a a+c�'. V' ww .� � d r. . 1 1*. , :, f ,^4 �y . _., • ,,,vY•9 I a ,t 3', '1.t.• iy •A-,-_? '> .-,,9Yj '� , . _. `. '0 • L. 1 & .a-,... ... ...y` tl t• .t^a', `'„un '••. °Vt9C' *,ats4ji^ • ', •i.in • w' 0! ,.. i 9G r, }• xw .• '.d• s'{i",...,,°..,.,,n ',:°`x _S i 1 C• gda., "r,-ad' e' �, C+ i C` r 1 i : { •• •}�` 'tt, It `l� _^�::,ti. 1 .f 4';}.. .j�Sl ,t.ay �.°+"1s 1.,«f' - • r t il ir,F ..+a;. z.;»'.c' •g'v -a.,.,.....1:2 /6.,,srwr"Y'r ar•fswsa .ft.' •-'',• fl u 'ti' �a w+ .�.m oa °m . 4,.. -,,,, si't'. ivaa,imanolg.i.joyaS‘of 0 0•4 tw :". • 1!.r •W";,. i''a.a:•4".4 Y_ Y., Ra�': R~ j,mrw.o:�,c<.s. -` w.:9@ u: I:SI - �a •, LU' ,,,,,,,,,,,, . ''yp...^"" r { fit' ;, g•-r , : ' ' }k,- I - .- b i 1• '',p• r c ti, �.vKiva;ai:e&.a:aaM.aa¢'o 1 sr.i - • _ ° ., .'.,T A: s.,o,,^aaas�L'w'RY gp„ }p9 j r: :_� .'. _ •�' .1 a f I 'i,t' 't:'' I ti V AA /j c 4x'�',d8 k 1 'd r 1 , .. , t c�+,�v i S tom• i �H. , ' , ,',,.� r:.''%l'-.. .�4. ., t, S i-'1'1 �7}j `tG•�'"�a"rc51 4 F7 j € .. ". e.•. .•,,..,'•t�..m- :" ,`� .sa.'rw�as2 { 6tikiria.fix+ , a�R, ---- (Y .i i t a,,SFr { �" 1 ; 1 f. � ' {F99i �1 f 1 . 4' Y`•.l • ° $., .wR �` t y. 'N�q.-,1' .ti' . , .,•�-� . { .,,{.... 9' 4� N i5enw ir• , ,4.'r,,,,,act,, .m `a ,, ,,1« t • A --_ i^.. i 1�1,•• . :1.Jt ;q-.7'. ,p_�,''tIx.s„•i I ..y',1 4,., ` .+. . la t ; ` • < J• i''0 1:t, .• 2t.`1S??t 9.s'"'J {�M-- '�Q$q, l ial'1 t ., •• ., scc-ac:v41avm•a:l!r"crats•ar.14-sr,accarz-cm 1:.F,: , , , i . • •d t 9.s ^ gyp _ . ._.,._ ' •1 ; ), *` ,..-..f • t ,,.,t ••bi°! ° ;°"'0 1<.. � ,. f ; 1 "aL TLs ..St, k i••1,", .., :. ..r. • a�i•- -a';• r, •.°1.: - V{1la••, > L' >,,..rrisaftx,-.. - ,. I • "- ' ' '• x'? tY tM:sS"M,• t {F " °"`-°`n�i'' , (,' �p�y,, .r,.p ; f+.i at':1'. ,..fy 1, +'.,.. •. ry ' • `a'S'iq •• ' ).d _' . ;ad..14t, i:,:.:k. ., K Y kS�,`�'i i ��tFF�� ,lRi.�p. '' ' si • _' ,+. -7 i) �' r 1�*'��py Ms1� f_iTuy' 3 11 ain 4.52't7...a,....•mnc+; ;79a ,...q. t '=0:2s 0.,, a ,,"-,r,,,, r .ar•ra.rm,+.,a+•.m..v,.eq•a, g ,, " ,• °�� . r+ s 3. _ P' eve s ��`` q a + •3 • , seams ,as, H-� ti me s ,-._•, a a crm� L. • x+auc• , mw--,..s.V.'i�a".>.%)inr --a -�'zntxar'•• J�u°a��e.cv, _ a� .rw. 1.a_...._.4' 4. 3ap.:nca.s .,.�.:..::.:3.:..v. ��• •a C q exq\ it i t a.Rm' < y • t P y., ; e a . 1* , ,._ E .i .....—._.__. ^.:a:.�.,.-,..:c•.ase::� e. C' REZONE AND SPECIAL ?DER?IIT: ' FIRST CIIURCII OF LI THE NAZARENE g i 1 • . .: ::,,...::,Z:�C=_.4..�- 1..<.- .�...:: ,5;= :litalt. ;,:;,xt;�.,. .>.0•::t, OW,:,. ., . .1,4 ,A...t::1.•>wXS.S.:„ ,, a • ::,,._,,...,`.«.-..:raze-.I-.:::�••••••,.t at :�•_n = 'a u 1 11 ;•,PPL_I CAN) FIRST CIIU I IL O.F_ THE.._,i`v:AzAlEN,E____^_.TO i AL AREA 1.6 . 5 acres___ _ ii PRINCIPAL ACCESS Una-on • Avenue N.E • • 4 F.,,T S I i NC: 7_0!4INC; C,, General. District s i i 4. EXISTING USE_.__.•_On.e_.sinb^le_..__.'ten ] Y__...t'esid`nn co/undetTe lone cl. " 'PROPOSED USE Expansion of ,achurch and associated educational. ......... _ facilities. COMPREHrNS IVI LAND USE PLAN _ _�S] ng) e Family Residential_ COMMENTS ___ T . sz'irf2cr-z,-n-,:-_nasr._9 s.. ^••,+r•......ascvr.�zv::ezr_• ,rtc+:r.>v:-�x.x:. errsr. v:a.. .ncgserra;.•it`c'==:.a:a:•'-t^ ycr:szx°sez:.xex?:eaascr•:s,ac"Cx-:Tncz::;, :-r;�,�:s,N' x»"""^"+•Q'u"' • • Wo iv-741t 2 J4VI:1 . • • Li -4Ltc.r)Prga • ,OOP chi • • • U L— I , 1 ®® it----.,-- . • ,,,,,c, 1 . ,...b , , •• . 1 LI , --------4,- - - - .-- ------,:i. • , • ; a1 I ��' t;W,I IS V ii ', F..... C3 C=•.gyp 6°+•'in on eva0 a)4•�J10. el) b',"" 'iJ el f}?ti'-., a)Mao oC"S'e:tolo^n'PAa:r? k atat.`O M 0. 0CatIV3 0 C-74)Q D::(::'6CZm +�. 4 li -J t. „... >f cp .� c a'at R1 ' c 2)»Fy«: P aaL d3Ia1,1 a g g C. 7 1 ',---1....,..........._.....,..J • i_ .i • fi' ¢$ «. .- ..•..........w,.. ...,...,,.....,....... .•,...�.....,.'a�._,..<,,,sR.a,......n..�e.,m.,n'amew.r+r .�h ..,,.,o.....,zm..,. .�,....*..a.«..,:,.wr i9 I Qoj { p "'kw 1::- 3 EB Tm41 �� 3 i el kD{.X:�;:wa ,.T) 6t.'�u7w'� Ti.a.9• �:s''s`d F:+ti Cs::"eJ �r9 c�".� C3}3 4:,�:,�'? �y F.�"• '. i c.f i far II /J i v2 f& "QL•T, fYa • . 765 , . *.fl'S' 1 •y s I a [ 1,1 0 - 4r .1 8 .549 ,;ITS3=0 16,.5T3 ez°G in EA r¢.+-^. 6-"3 Gr `,^,ra c.1"i)a,fr ..'"Jam tr. ---,--.v---.1-----. ..�,..o.,_;..-:.. ..., iy. . . 17-1 1 rt73 —1 : . . ru7:J CD L 0 ..,, , , ti 0 i 1 E:I Li] ' •r-, I r-j 0. Eili c-,3 [,1 ......,.....1_,.....- • ._ __ _A.- t--4- ',,,. .L.J..... _ • . „......0_,A. H .. .;,,,e1 `B � r� a sas ^�r �^', u.:';_ .n 3 d— .. - - - - -• _ - Wit, 3s,'•'s:�.-R. . ,,n.,� • • • 6 • • • • • • 1 f• • { { • • • lih%,)',. �11 J.,f is t;C J rpiJ - ^ - .. • - - - .,.„ . . . ,,,',' '.::',,-••-)-..:.:.;..,-.,•V't • . 5,r,,'-'4., ,;.3-1•es':';e: , • -- ntosn: P 1 anni09.. Department: . ,, . 0,00:4e1" . DEVELOPPENTAPPLIEATIONAEVILW , HEET-, ,g1r;,‘T -- . ,,e,,... - , % ,:.,.,..,.,: pp.lication :_,ArL-Ftmee.-: i..9 3i,,:. 79/ e,5-,,,tv.fe/14 Ackw. r esr" , /?3,_4,--70 / ._. ;. . .. - ' f(4 CP4421-f-P---delLt-$1-?-•-1,0---.0 c.J.r...9....aft...c..-1,-c-19.. _...,(5 4_, ....II-a.m., -.7? C2* krfi' CrPettArT"I') GTO Sig- • • .,, / . (1' ,in ,.,-.7=• ',/ A . ' ': NI , :, ,,'• Location : t i Ce•diLl4Lekt_ . . t ,,, APP1 iCabt : "-it'(,-7StC....- ill urct ve--4 A Ah"- — - - - ' • .........___.....1_,g.,:.. , ,. . . . TO : Parks Department • • ' - SaINITLI-1) HEARING 'MIT '• ifi;')/Pf•V-PF • • • • • 9....':''f'..(..P9......t'•........"........ . , / ' .4' Police Department ; ' '',; ,, k, C,, ET I r•1 C 4'49//97/ J. . . •.• • • _ 1.......z....,r4.._....„... . . , --, . . . • . . Public Works . DeP.artment . • • , . , --- . • •• . . - • . E • . ' . .n i neer i n•gi v is i on . , . . . • . ' •. .., _........_... .. . , , • • • , • . . Tr a f f i q Engi ne,er i ng • ' " • . • . . • , •. --- • . . „, - . . . .. .• ,,, . . , . . , • 1.-"'building Division': . . • . . . 1 • . . . • • . ., . ,. .. . .. -. , • •. ' Ut _ ____ 1 1 i ti es . Enginoering. ' . . • . . ..,_ __ . .2 . ,. - . ' • . Fire DepartLont . . ......___ . . . . ..• . . • . . . . ---• . ,, :. „ ' . . , . •„ . • • . , . , , • , . _____ ___ .._..______, • . . . . , . • . • • • . - -. cell':'ENTS o SHGGESTINNS 13EGIARDING T 11 f S NTI 'CATION HOLI.j D K PkOVIPED ' • • -.: IN WRIMG 'OR THE APPLItAitON 14..VIRI CONrEkFNCE_ (AkC) 10 HERE:in :0'd ' . • ily11 .___ Al (J ..U0 Am IN 111E. 11111M 1100k CtINIITENCE. ,,,,,,, . •F y OUR DEPAR-FME NT7-1)I VI SION REPRE,SI-.N1AT I VE 11 1 LI NO I ,BE ABLE .TO - • ' Al If:Ng THE ARE , PIEA$E PROVIDE THE COMNENTS TO THE Pt ANN I NC DEPARTMENT - • ' • ' RE VILVIING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /),e_t..), (., , . • - • - '-• j ,Approvod Approved with conditions Not Approved . • . , , ,• - . . .. .. . . . . • ' • • . . • . . • ' ' . , . . .. •,. . . • ' . . . .,. . . . . • . , . • . , , , , . • . . • . . .• . , . . . , . . . . '.- ...,.., /' . • . /-4.,,,, _ 2 •,, •,,, (..ii gnat oro of D i rect or or Author iz cd /1), p 0 s o n t at i v e. ' Date , . . . ' RE 111 1.11 1 N G t"PART fl E NT!D I US I ON : • e...„, ,:.,„,, ,, . .___ _____ ____. .._... ____.. .,...._ _. ,.... J . . . • . Approved / A 1.1.)r o v.e d Vlitil COIlditi011 S Not Approved _____..__ '---1----- ....<2....-Z4-- . . , ,,') :1,-..i.-3 e-c-—- ('-'''' -0?,./.. ' • ("/) ' 3 U (// , . . ...,, • . . . . . . • • . : ; . • • • • • . . .. . . , • . • , • • ' . ,.• . • • • • .„ .. • ' , . . . , . • • . ., ' .. • . . " ' • •,.....•..,, 1 . '• (-----AD . 1 ..__ . .. .. .. . _ ..,_ ........ . . IIJ S'iichatur-,! of Di to or Autori ./.0i. ftt,-pre.:,c,nOti ./ : • '' ' ILi.: 16: LrPhRTFIENT/DiVISTO : ____..........._ _...,_______ _ • . .._ ..,,.... -.. • , Aved iTh-,r u.\•.-. ,I w i c t h eq)::',:i t i n 11 • , Not Approved . - - . .- . , .. . . . . .. . .. BY 5:OU N.; ON .,Li/i.)11,...,-fi-7,'v , • :,.:.',,,,,•.,,,. ,,,...;,-..........-7....,,i„..-,-.:7_,-,,,-..„. ..:-...„_.--.-......:„.....,..:,-..,-:_-.„,-.....-.-.,...• 7...7..-:-:r.,..-77,.......:-..::...:,,7..,..;:r.,..1;4...:7..•,.•:•.:-^-1-...:7..,..,.7-.7:7.:7....--=,.-- ',,.;:,--..,.•.:77:.17.7..Zar71...1,..7,:-.7 7.7....r7..771:0:::,"-14k;,),,:,. . , Ell 1115 D E P AR.T. ME. NT/• . t.I•.S r,.1:-0 N r .. ' ' l o‘ Ld AppoVed ' witi cOnditions 4:tfAp :( ve:- 1...4°,.:'.!..Sl!.'':t-.4,1e.,,.,r.k0'il-l.4,„1'.'--i•,,.:,.:,;..,-,.,..,,-:,,',.::.. •.: . . . • . ... x . ., ... . ' -. ' ':':::.' " -' '. ' • •' .-".',.1'il,V,:r !..,.., . ,...-. ,.., .• .•• ...„ ,• .• . . . ., -- •. . _ --,.., , . . . . ,,....,- .. - . . . . .,,--•. . , .. . . .. . , . . . . .•. . . . , ..„„, ,...: . ._ .. . . .. . . , . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . .. . . ... ‘ , .. . . . . „... . . .• _ . . . _ , . .. . 7 I-, \ •c. ..., . ,,, , . . . ,,.: ... .• - , — . - /I ., . _ .• . . . . . ._ . . , ' I/ 1 . .. . . . , . . . . . . , •••, ,---,. •„ .. , . . , . . . . :-....;.,..:':,.- • . „ . , ..., . . •;•1 • •/2/ ----:.----/-‘,------',-•—• - SI . • ,...., .' : , ,, ,,'-----d:Z2 i . ' • .-•-.=. " - • .‘....--- •-/-•--;:t. L.I..., '-2,--„, C., . .4.:',/,-,•:: 'L.::: . <•••••-•••--__-,• / /// 2' 177 _....-------- .- ..,':,-,-,5„,•:: Si nature of Director or -XtithOii .i.od ' Represo,Itative - Date r VIS REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ---'-'7"------"------- ---'''''''''' ."----' '. .- -7--- ..___ 12ayks: and Recreation Approved Approved with conditions - . . . Not Approved , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . •.. , . . . . . . ..,..-•.r. . • . . . .. . .. . ;..., -. . . . . . . . . _ . . • . , . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . .. .. - . . . . .. . . . . , . , . , . • . . . . . . . . . , . . •-• . . . . . . . „ . .. . . . , . . . • . . . . . . , . , .• • . . . . . • . . • . .. . • . . . , . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . .. . . r ,, 0, . . . . . .. / ...._ ._ . , flt t-- 1.._ S.....—.../ek.S..\::;\..__ .. . • REVILUING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7D )I-C.-s- , I .. • . • . . . .• - Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved , . _: . . . . - . . 1 • . . . . . ; . . • . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . • . • . . . , . ., . . . . . . ...--------2 , . . . . . , . , • • . ...--- .. --- --------) ."'" .4 ..,"''''''. ......" . . ....'' ''''' „//,/%/'X''''''''' „,... ...- /.., 7 . , . , i 9'-"q../C /2-,..., - ,i ,.„,.., ..--• —it • ‘," '.."- • n3turo Jf Director or . Alithorized Representative Da-4,e REV D.:.PARTMEN1-/DIVISIO : .„ ._....... _ . ,•. . , . • Not Approved Appr,-.1v,:d An,wovd with cont. itions . ._ . _ . . . . . . • • , . . . , . . . . , . I I . , I I , . • '. . \ • . I . . .. I . . . . I . • • ' . • ' I . I . . ' 0.. . . •' . I I -• I I , I ' , ' , . , • • • ..- . . .• , . . . I • . . • .. . . , . ,.,. • • • . I . „ • . . • • . . I . .. , .. . • t . • ' ••. ' I . . . . I . ' 7 T;. f t i '6 —6 f [Tii::,-.i:.frii-is.6-1' 1 ii'--i'26 4 g 6 fil•6 se.ii fa t i . • • . _ , . , . , . . . . . , . . • . • , .. . . . . . , . • . . ,. . .. ....,... ., . . . . . . , • • . . . • . ... , , ,. .... „, • .. . . • , . . - •.• ••• • . . . . . . PROPOSED/FINAL L. , ...:LAF. ATIoN or ::SIGNIFI:CANC / c:AKE „1-SIGNYEI` ''''• , -.‘, '`,':,:.' '', gysOsi.:1 u,- • : , , ,,- ..,..._..._....... ...,...._:....„. .... ,,....._—__ , : -- ..-:...._______:_.,:, - : . ' ' . ,,,,•-: ,,.,,,, 1 :' . R-434-7,9 . . , . . .. '.,':', - 11\pplicatiori No . 'SP-435• 79 : '.. - 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No,: 1,,CF-L51,4-79 .', . ,FINAL Declaration ,•:-.,,:.,:. : Description of proposal Rezone of 6. 5 acres from 1!(-1". I.-,o '' 4-1" ,, • , „ .. -,,,,,:•,,„:, and expansdon of church facilities by 6S.Q0 squai-e, feet. . 1 ...,, . Proponent • FIRST CilURCII OF THE i;iAZARENE , . , • . 850 Union Ayenver N.-E;. :- ' ,•, , : , , ; , Location of Proposal Lead Agency CITY or REITTON. PLANNTNG. DEPARTMENT ... This proposal has been determined to ED have : 0 not have a • „ significant adverse impact upon the environment : • An EIS 0, is r'L is not required under RCW 43 . 2,1C . 0, 0( ) (c ) ., This deciston was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental ''-','''' '•, , checklist and other information oh file with the lead ag6ncy . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : , 1. Consistent with Gomprehensive :Plan and Policies , 2 Meets all mitigating measures of Zoning Ordinance. ---------1--- , .., , ... , .„ , . • , • , . Measures , if any , that could be taken to •prevent or, mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent tht t.he le ,d agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/ final )- declaration of non-signifi:cance : • , : • . , . - . - , . . •:" : Responsible Offirojal David R. Clemens Title pnior P1 ann5y7 Date November 9 , l979 ,. -----7777----,-/- 1::---•/ /, — . / ;, y„- 7 Signature 14,,,Z,..,7' ,, ( ,/„.1,:/.7.,./(..-.:2 City of Renton . , Planning Department i5 •76 . - ! . . - . . , „ . . . , . „ . . „ r . . „ . ,,,, -_, ' `••,.,#..y. ,;.. . - -' . . . . ,.......,.. 1....-•...,. - . ;". -' i..' . ' • '... ,„.'„" . ^. • . .-," - , . . • . ' '' ''..';',.'. . . -• ' .: '.. x . . z . .. , .. . .. • . . .' . . .. . . , .. - . ,• . ' .,. . .. ' • • '"%,'N '''... . r-571 ',. -7-, .7- . . LP .tjeiN N\ [ ( r ,-1 .v, -, 10 . ..,;:z,1 11., , -=‘,,.....:. I \- 1.-i ...„.,..„ .1 N ,L.L.,.\.. ILA A. ,...- . .. ......—.._____,-- . . . ,.. •• . •,,,...i. • . , ‘...., II R ..„... gi - I-I ' - '' C11 613) im 1..1 ., A. ,c. 111 e IN T ., 717 ....,,- Lir"' A It 1 r: il 4 Is. n .. . ___ •: __ ._ _ • _.•__. _.__:_______y._______ __„,:.:„..r•.„e....,_..„_„. 4.T. __•_ „_..,_ ,• • , . . . .... • . .. • , • . • • . . . , . ...„-- ..... ........,.....„...„.._ •. , . ,.,. ... ,, . . . . • ._ • . . . • . , ---- .-- -t T.4imt.: ---....• . • • . ' 'Vat, •,, - 0 ----,7-- . ....",„..„,„_-,2r•-vr,„&aw.,;:•:....v.:,:ofk. :.2 ••14-q1,-„_, -.±...---nt, -__...... • . ,_ , . . ‘ .,..,,,.2._ -•-•-•• ,,,,,,,,,••--„ ...t ----.4,,,cr.fip,,,ligt.,-.71,04,,r.:0-7,,...-7-im--.----- : -.,,,,••- ,•• _,,,...-=„7...:..r,s2L7=-2.....- . ' •' i-7,.77.,47,...,„:-..1.,1;;47%,7744,...'.74F,.-...1=0-•‘1,-,...,,77.4=.73.e.iitkr.r. • ' I ••-• • ,. ..ivez',.-ticr;&-k-•.4 .7•411.-,0.,,,iailz-,;:41,3;,1,: .=3:1, -- , "i = " - - " • . • --.... • '''''' 'i-. - "*.0,1,t -.,-,:W15:1•,--.., .- '."7:2Z-...”,„-- ' '%:2:7:-,s,.;;`," sr tv;11,,,'.41-V4s,„,-,"•,S-?...;4'4,i'v;W:,,-".',-,7t.irt,-.' s - , Nts , - . ,. - • • el .. -.,-,..;,- f.K.,.1-4,:.,.-.^:,,et A:'-4A74.7gtfor=a2A-"---r-:— . ,,,..,..-iim-tagliz.n..,;, -se.4;,---', ' ir "4• 'AI' j. , 'i.',1 Itie., :ititjaiiv"I"T•r------ ..,, . •i -,.:-.=',,•-l'e*-.*'''''''5,1;',e,',4›. ...set • ,,..,_ --,-,,,,,,,,'"-. ......-__ ,......g."-\-.j t 1 ••0 -1,4_4._.-%.7 .,.,i.,1,?.4:. ,.. ...•• . _ .•71,, ;., ...4L -.,,,4- •.•-• •. IsAIO . . , . " a ,. a*...A..• ••-re...7. ;47•• .• •,. -,•• . •- . -, '''41 • , - .f.',*'4 i.;'3-1- ei.tt4T"4'.'.i '''''•••€';i'..' ! - " - ; '. ."'"w"........c. „,........? - /-31?,.'417-' ,,,,,,.„.4,.47,7,,,ilm!rt-4fri''t I• --- . •7 7'-,:-..,,,p7=f.•:,f÷,1-,ii ,„.•16•1 • • -, ' -. ...t.., . '-v`c'ei;'-__..,r... ,..- './t- ' --- '-fspk- ,'-f-`F.I.,.'' ''!.. -'''''' ...1......:,,,,,.›--- -••••114'47r.....‹.),..T,t.,,,a- ,r,'..=.1*,..„.. .,....., 1.cr -.4. . 11,.!.,Z1, 24':'. - . . , ; • - -.., .' P ,.,,,:._-,..:44k“'ye_ t• 46,...,!.; . .' . ;.,•,.,-"r7-'7--... •••-•7-,70,-,A. r•47.7,>4-11 . . .............—z-L.--,. ......4" ..,._, ..,..-.... . ..Wfit': 'izer'ifkoi..?4,•:.1 .:,- ,'-2-;,it 'f.:',1-, . r--:c),:ti- wt,I., ,,,,,,..1„, ,. „t, ....t..$ . , . 4 . 4:- ;,kat. '--•' • -0:24v,-...,11.,-Li, ,-.4 t•.. • ••i-J' '' -•---;, itzit-,qp1,011.....- -5::...;*•.; ,- .. ..:•:••,,,,..,,,,,,:.,...,..,,,,Jfi oieVr•',I X.:f4,74,i ',Y,Y;;;FA".t?. -, :',;...,'i- ,, .,. osg.,;„,,,iiii•A,s.e,i,,t,,,-: ,,,,,,,4,,,.. ,....,IN.,..A....e"st4L,,,,,,z,,,1,.,4f<4.:,e,Is. t y,,.5,..., -, „....... • ti,„...,"?t,t.. .."...,r. .. • . _ • 7•-,tV te---3., -""`"1-*'''''zs--------4.`.,-.•' '..=;zi:tet':t7...,,-:.,,•••44,c,„„4,titli," ' -,'..*., -- ,-"• ' I 4,- - ... • , . .:•'?" - : '""''' ' 4,'4,,..2.„?-iic'...:.,..„,..,,,,,..4.,,,. ,- ...v.,,,•;.--.:___ . , - -... i- * €1,2-." •_ siti'N:r.,'-'- -•zs-IT.',*•...t....."'!#4,lit'il7FF.70PiTiFm ,x.„-7,-57m; .,. - ,,,,irasomets..*.z.,,,,..4r......., , 43.-41;,.,41:1:Na WfTjr:'.....,.,. . t... ...:,Yrtirrt.,,,,V.....!•:-.94414".,. .rj.,,,0 „d ,s..r,,i ip, ..'..",,,A ,.:,gy,A .,,,;‘,. 4.01/' 6t,,,1:4• , p.-• -.... 1,- l- --- ,7,4„ 4k,..,I:7.. ......_.,.....,. y 'F.,.....-•,,,,,,'‘,-„, •Qp.114;,•...,... 1, ,,. ,. , ''''''''-14- . =re.k t.,..'tit,' "-.5'41-1,44;i‘4t-,.:,,,, pfp:fr,-,...,41-1 -- e'-: .'Pll, '4:: - -' '3:4..-,,LL:i. it:4.7h•tg. .• _41. ..,-,7•-•.77-......,----.,... • , ----,-7w.--z.rt447_:ee_t!=•'••7.4.',,vd.,,,,''...„,,7,.,ff,,F..m.,...,, 7,-„,..,,.., "II .• . k4171:`0•74.,-I-P.A.; .••....t ,„7, . . .-.7.•1 :7!" -- i, Ig.4941',73 - -.....---- - „,.,:.,„4,172,1 ,•4!,.'.S_Wle-Z$2,1",..1..--".7..._ ._ .__ . __ ---"------7-.-7, ,,.. •,- ..•.-,-!---4••'0•2-7,..,.- - -,.a••••;i=11-•"•...9-'..• •:1•," -,,,^w,c..-,,,v,-,_ .:13,... ,.,k1'--- 4`•1,-,t,,,:-'7",70.5', 1,:::.•r'',,R,=,_ ,••''.5.' ,;:•%;','.%.-,',. .'.:•.A.7:.4'1,i.i.;r'''.,•$i'L'‘‘).A.`-'-',‘•• •-',:r, f :'''''"'"'''''``‘ k,•-•—•--- ...,.t.:,-?----"---.-•"•-•'-':e''' .••.. •='''",.:_!,,z,..i.:( A,7„,•,•;1:-..1-1,,,, . ••,,..A44,:.,.....r..7,K7c -f.,,:i.----_,.-;-u-i,rwrc,.--i.rn ,-;:7.).,r;177::',F7xT,Tf-:.,-,,,-,•.:'-'77;e••37.:0.=,:i4..0 ,-ii....y,.-----..-‘—....7,1•: ._. _ .7,..:.,e.,,,..„....i.z......,, ve-.7.-...:".2--------. • -:,'",;.eiice;i:7-1;4.':`6'41'....7'1'44.:-,f17'-',44-1q.:ei:;qA:?-= '-.;•71i:'.1:6';'ilij'Zii...A-•;:"-•:*•",',• ,.:,••.:-,,.;;74V--7,--Elve.--n- ''''"_ 4.. •---'-'•-t-f•-ki;.,.*-W-. e•-•..7-Viv,• •••"ft,,".1C.: 1'-,1,,ee...14,.e.t;:•?..--,•,.,..:gz...",_;,:-:-.7.!'77,t,e•di.-•%Tid:,=-=_Z-_-- -',--itc'''''' '''''-'.----- --•-• --i:•'•'•:'" '?" - ' t ,.... ., --"=•• '.W. 1- .4 1 ..., ,..4.rt,;74,,,..„,,,....• ,t,..... ..., ..e....‘4.17.-.0..p.'ilk.-.7- --..7_"..-2,-_,-..-1;;•,:_- ...... - — , • '--:--- ;.L: ..-41 (-7:- - • •;-.3f , ---- _.:`.77*,7"--'''-'.:---r-----•,--'----:._ '' ' "--.si4e,',..i. ______.,... "••-.._... -'-'----;'---.,i,-;!;•11.Z- ....: .....; 11 . • , . ....7/....._--"' --• h . . • . ........,,•-: • ill • ' .-. -- ' .• .• Ili • ,. . All_Z A NON t St ASSOC.',/1 TES , . . ,011 .LS• 14.41.4 - A L.n o.4 -. . . . • ' : . 1••!) . ..., • . . , . . • . . - .. .. . , • . . . . . ,•• . , • . , . •• • .• . . , . . .• • • . - • . • ‘' '' '.: „.:''''•„ • .' • ' .. •. . . " ';..,;•1,..,•• - . „ „ „.„.., •'.•''.'q•'.,::.• • ,-. „i., - ,, , • , . . ; ' • • ..'•-;".. -;;.:; . . • . • - , • . -• . . . • ., . . . .• • . , . • • .• , . . • . . . ,. . . . ., ,. . , . . . . . . • ,.- . . . • • . . ,,, , . ' ..•• , ... . • " - . .. . - • ..,. ' . „ . • . , . •• . • f,,,,,,..0.•,;•_;/.:,.,',.. ' • ' , . ' . •'•••••:0•'...*.,.`!c... "...., , - • ...... . ,. .. . . ',' .,. , .kii•',,.',1'. '..;,v...'".,,.. • . ' •;,,,,,.',,,,t,7.:',4'..:•:,1;•',,' •• •; ; . ,' - ...',••:''.3 '' '' ; . . , • . . • . . . 4,-,--.0''',,,-;;,,,,,••••`'•,•"" . , ,'Sj47Pr.f;•;.?.1, '' , - . . • , , ' ' ' • . 6,',•,'W'''......;_!".'''':-.I. ,' , . . ,. ., .., _ _ . ' . • : ' • : ; , '?;;;!_11-:'';-:',1'' . . ...• • . , . . ,,, .' ..,•, --' e . .. . . . • „'•.;,- ;,N''''.''• • ;-, I ' . . ' . , • -„ . ..,. ., . ., „ , , -'-,11 ••• , .. . • • . , . • .. . ,_ • . -. ... , .. . . .. . i • • . • ; -•.f. '. 1 . ' • . . . . • . . r.........1, . ,,-,t,rwi,,, • , , --1,.:3„:„..,„,.1 , • . . _ • . . . . . . . • ,..„.„‘„,..:,...,.... , . fil - , , .4tri'i•,•,,?.,;; . . ., . . . __, , • . • IA , - • ,,, i., , . , . ra.,...,..,,e,; .,:,,,,I, -. ' • . . , ,-----,,i.:.;.,•,- .' . . . - .1..z.••=i1 ,, ,..,,,,,_„..„.,...-- ‘, . r.•'..,„74-4,ik",:;•,•••%';',,..---- • -, -- , .:,,:t.,n.,,,•,,,,,•,::..',,,,;;,, I---I'll ) —4t.i.'"4".,-...i.'" • . . : . -,c..,..,-,,,,,,.....,;•••,,,,.. , ,_....11 ,::: -,:,2 ... I- ; .• . . , • ,,,....f.„.•,-„,'..i.; • • • , 4:.•,:-.._2 . . ....••••.:1",..:- •--• 1 L ',1'' I q'L, . , • .,...,::: ,,! T, , • . :' '.. ;.i 4 . „ .:.1.,,, • - • I L_J,.4, .1 ii; . ,i,'. ,P4,-,"•,•,:,1 ' , i s i „ . ._ .• . '. " il,, .;1 til . . ' .1 . '..›le.,1 ' . ,. •• ,4 . •. • • • . . • ' i . ...: [.1•TtH• il ..i.'.4::i 1 . . '' .' ;•••1:,';,1 I ; •,,;.!i.41 i - r, i ; •.; .; lk 1..-3 , •. i'!-t;•II . i'l l '-•-4 ' '• PI : • _ .. • • •.• . ;pi . . . , ..: i , 1, ••,„ , ; „ I 1 ;•'0. . .., - -. ‘ ' ,r -.- ',;•;',.tl:•. •;iik,u1 1 El tl ' ''•, . • . . \ \ •/ ,., '.: • i .--- 1.,1".]i r; ' .:k , , . •i ..... P. I 1 • #,. 1 1-,•-1.1 114 .. . II •• '. ; ' - ; ,. . .\1 '' ' i*Z . ti lipi . '• ' .. ;',;!;,,; . .• „ . i - . . • . „• ''.' ::,',i 11 ; ,i , i. ;. ;‘; • • • , . . ' Cli di ' ,..._ •i''';:1 . . 1-', ..; 21 •• . ..; I si .4.;;, .• . Pi —1 i' ,';qi • . • , •ii '0; .. . IN ,,,! - i .l'\ r1 ', '1,', . . , , . . ,,,. •, L--t I', 14 ., 11 ‘ 1..,:::•."':' 1; ' ,. :Es.; ..-s. • 1 • . . I • i •, , . . . • sop i - . • , ii, _.-- , iii!II,ol Lil I . . .. 4 . • . . ,.. _ t • 1,. , .. ., „ . . ,. . ,. • ,, ,, , , , . .. . . . • i., , MIL: ii i ; _ • 1:1', '`•I',,, i', . : - i';',,• i :11 ! i . ''.7 ' 111115„4 ,'f ',.; .. ; • i‘,1 ,, ,t.: . , i I. . 1 . ,. „1, • orsi.t:,11 4 ' • • • • 1 6 • • t• , , .., • p ) ri.,' .,,, I, , •„:. , • I . . •. . ..,, • , ..,.. • . . ,1: i.t . •.1,.,i. . 1•.;,',. ;•.; f'd "-- Mi,;,,-;;;• .. • . ;•,.. e, . -,;`•il 0 4.:',, ! . , .,. 1 ':i • • — '!,iii •,•.4_1, fis.'i';'•?ti - .3,-. 1; I •J gi . . , .. ,,, .',;';'•;:,.,;•1 El •-•,----•-•1• ,• I' . ,..t. I; . • r . , -1,-, ' ' i • , .• 1,"I • ;'k „ •• • . . . r ' . • 1 , IN: .., •.-- I''''' , . . It?: ., ;• , • .. . I ••.. • ! , . , . , . . , . . . . . . .. ! . . ., —rp 00.VCrl....'41ACI4,17 7, . • ., . 1-,1,i1).; I Is.I I 2,1.:NP-1`:T t.,",'•:9..?'(?cii.,•;:rlis --.?,R4'..?-Y-7747/V--- . , ,,„c vx.„4..,..... ..._ I - ; "-7--"- -- „ . '' i,'.•It'l:;.! 1 Ini---i-,-.,z-..,76.t.t.-7-„,m ,--:`,77-:4:,;,'-' /,-g: ,,:-.,,,,,, cri,',:.`r/A.1 fil-4,17.4 AZ-5-•Ag_a.-.:---___ • . i n Z . n ,3. —, • '. .. ' '" ' ' ' • .,, ,•",•‘.,',1-.7'7...:,•,-y•s•mer••,4,-.7,4•1•.1.7,,ne:i- , p4,,,:;ic`,-.',..:!‘:' ;.-14';-,'f,',. ... .•,•',;..', •'.,•,.. '' -,' . . . „. , , .f.),.,;:7.. . ,, g.7n1:0 1;'g:44,174:f.„.'-';.`,•:",;;;.;;;,••••;:;',•'...:",-,:'.','";'i:-;',' ';• '• ••' •4 .'i.`, , '"!..'' T -.'14%!-;i:;... ,,i,,,,:41:44.•;;•.45_;;,,,,, ,...'.;;..,,i..,1,,,,L.,.1,-.,19 ,7-1;,i;li,;CV:'•*.:.0.",,...'1'!'ii,..1..i,,,:',,:i':::,..'.'i,%•(.',A:•?,%;•'',''''•'''' '•:'' -'' '-:, , ',''''''',.;12',.:.1.';';:l.S.;.C':',.•.:!'''','' i.;:i...,illi,)-341;-*P-;5'.4A,IA'S.t'r,V.IllirRI :' . . ,..., 1",::;..1,,,,,,,,,,,;$4,,,LZW:i'Vet;,44pyi,?,.4:q"M!;',".;.;,•-az-ii",',';'-'.0.-','i''i-,1,..•,,,:....4';.;;,,,,",k;..•;i..,-.0..4 ,•-. •...-11;-',-;,:,"..Th,.....1,1..Y4','!•-i,•.;.V.ii.rq.,-,!„,40.!.Ikri-,"..74•P;;:,1..-1$1,4•.4.14.,"1.V!g•Ii.Ttrl . - - , -Itr'''S`r.,t.';',,T-F•:,-,,,,,•,-.;:;,.:•,-;••••::•-•',00,'1.1,e,,,- ....-'..,.-'.,•'1.44i.p.',1.,...,..,c,.'•-,,,,,,:-•-`,'.`t,'.',',,:, ''- .,' '‘;-A..;•;-t,,; ;-1.7.d,...-0:;.;...A,:',11,c.a,-;,V,,,:7,iigt,',,:,...q‘,1,,,,,,,,,,'•'-','ag,..;•tr„.ast,,14,;k;'-,\;14i, . ,;-i,,.4.-t...f.,12,,f,,,,i oc,•,,,,yi.Tie.,,,tr,,,,,Ai.4"rA,W01:1:-.Vik.:T4t'.4...k.,-,,,,5--.-,:',•,';',q,',.1,,*,,ir:'-'?.tA',.1,i'p',7.'',,'''''','.1rZ.,f.;',...•,'Xi:?,i7;qtrW'l;%:.,14r14.‘,4°, 1'-',1';t6.,7iiir..49.47,-Vi:'4;;;i1, 4`44- ' `. ig4.-Z4'44-',444.4 \WV,V,t4Ter.•';'''''eA'i•?'341-P'4,11:44,.;ii 44a#...,.:V'A.;0'..-ft, ",-. • "..•-.,f,.,,',.:'-',1•,.1:,.'•••,. '•,,,,,-;..-•'•' ...•!: .•- ; -....Al‘,...r .. .. .....,.,.._.. -. .- y> ins y= i��'. a "Plr 'afiEr'=�. S:S;- ^i;+j:r 1'• ::L'*Jtr wK< j, 5 �C7 a. kJ i,^ sy ;tc'�h,s ~J.r — -1 f • ;;j''v <Y t 6, �,,.yn N F' s •T `-F 1. �,r • v} J t �:i 5iE nbh• ! 3 t, .} it• t v/ �;. " Y .fY%' :>ILm,e;','TY.t.f ,{i4 f+ z - "34 Rx .,�iv >o, • • sr xf: ti: s. �. PUBL IC��-` R P E :��VNO K�r��p�. ARTM NT.ry :-�. :� .J�. 1,. ..,.. - ;'=Y. UTILIT. ENGINEERING .,O V S1 'N h ► o. ! .1 O . :..•: 235-2631:, s' ><x,., r >?a.,v4�`_,-s _ - MU ICIP,AL'BUJ BUILDING 200.MILL AV,E'.SO..RENTON WA;:, 9 5.' '``' ° 3:e f� Y' . fi , F - -- 0 Z E E P -S , HAR ES'J. T l D EA - L U�-. R E T N I' .t. M A Y O R. „a •sa' ;$"� is ''ri': yvY.� y;. h -r , 97 'f t: 1. '�i s "iC. - • Church of Nazarene 1 1Ave. N� r•� ; , We s A e. N. an d�St':` 3. Renton., WA ., 98055 Attention: Pastor Woods . Subject: -Sewer � S'e,r'vice- wi,'y c ' • Gentlemen. : ; , ' This department has' :investigated, the, downstream sanitary' sewers 4,:: •^' • and determined there-' i s sufficient,;capacity .t.o handle the ' effluent from your; proposed church. • Upon .annexation or•.proper• 'app.l•i cat ion. sanitary sewer service i,s.: ,`:°: ., available to._'the site:` . Very truly yours, , - Warren C. Gonnason,- P.E. r . • Public Works Director - RCH:pmp C ' .--•., i a I) j' ".41frie C:r r , First Church of the Nazarene 850 Union Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98055 August 23, 1979 , . , . . , Office of Land Use Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South .- Renton, Washington 98055 A- Dear Sir: On March 22, 1977, the First Church of the Nazarene in Renton, ' Washington, requested at a public hearing, a special permit for location of a church within a single family residence district. There was no opposition. On March 29, 1977, the Hering Examiner approved the request. (The file number is SP-003-77) . ,- . ' Since that time we have revised our building to what we believe, , will be more compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. We believe that by maintaining the 100 ft setback from the north property , = line, and the 18 ft setback from the south property line, as permitted , under the special permit; moving the building forward to have a setback . ., of approximately 150 ft would be more eye appealing to the community. This would make our building have the same setback as the Honey Dew Elementary School which is next door to the south. r Our reason for moving the building forward is not only for eye appeal from Union Avenue, but also for easier access for fire protection. We : have counseled with Chief Geissler and are in full agreement with his '. desires. Correspondence is attached for you review. - s We believe that the above mentioned change is for the betterment of the community and the fire protection of the property. We believe that this change is within the scope of the original permit. Your concurrence will be greatly appreciated. - ' ., . , Furthermore, we would appreciate the possibility of the existing , - , e . * I t _ RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON , . HEARING EXAMINER AUG2 31979 xm PM 7.8,9410111112a'2,3,41516 -- i del. Y . - _ garage, presently serving the existing parsonage, to remain. It was inadvertently omitted on the first proposal by our designer. } Sincerely, ,.:,s:-a'. , /✓(ice/�c �� C. G .,- Lowell Welker, "` Pastor;''President LW/ag • • • r : -�S S' h . :t^ n� M1Jti,� J'S 1 - r;j. x' 1 �Cam-~�`�`...n ..�t_, Ft. I� In- yi. "i F S�. ��F� •R 4' O. :','''..'::, : •.;':'-': ....': '.1� '1 w =C OF :HARE- :T �TNT. a O' CHARLES.J: DELAURENTI:-MAYOR: . ♦/ Z Q • - :•FIRE:- DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS"„ , a ' Off; :MUNICIPAL• 8UiLDING /,.20,0,MILL�AVE. S.'RENTON, WA, 98055-1 235�2642 . - 9qr g�c - CHIEF; DICK GEISSLER ' - Fo SEPSE �^ ,. ` ' . ,,, August3',:2 ':19,7 9„ , ;:tip.; ,v': Pastor .towel Welker. ; , " First Church of"the Nazarene, t • 24.6 Wells' Ave'. No.: - Renton�, • Washington: , 9805'5' - ' - Z . , • Dear Pastor .- - . - , Regarding,ou•r ,conversa.ti.on,on, '-fire, protection requirements.':';- '..�..;-, .,. • .'_: on your.:'new proposed -church,: located .on" Onion Ave N'.E.-,,- just. -north_-of. Honeydew ;:Elementry, School'. , i - . A. new water,main 'and , fire hydrant will . be required. The ! fire -hydrant shall be located approximately one -half , , ', ; - ' ,•.. -` • way of the building: within •fifty feet.:-of.' exterior wall , -. ` - ' near -entrance. ' • _ 's ,`;, l A fire alarm.`:system -is required,• I -would-'Irecommend.'.this • _• . : -.., system be connected 'to a central, station ' ,j„ uletca:y to�qe. .{, _ - .. 1 �' g•' :f., .,..,. �YV .:?Ssa�.'' '�§':^��r-:' � .l: -;`,'�;; 'F "�kc`1. i,��- ,��>ti..+� .,�r' ' .. - - �'1y{'"�� :'41'-.4.. .S F t _ :ti 'i� r:^•��''�:, Xi �.£2'x; d �� .Y :, -u �.,'$� ��1iMu • .ire +max, '#Herej�L;�mt�'sr�'�,t'�:. �5`,,1S�,v: br,tc�.t";x':•NP�'��:+x?1^�,Y..,: ,,4,, ,�,: ';9q;{,w R�.'�' +;RuJ.;A�•. �e" d*�y �' t�� '` ^�ii.y.� ,a �5�.''�� _ C'��, r �" 11=.a`S �E* ri yiaerSi-hog—$ , ice. ",, �'`` ia.4 - ,,. ,i1,�.4.'20* 1. r ,.,a.„Fr -!�'1,:,;;y�•��I��' '.t`��,: -�,�'��',•�:t";,'=. ',;;:.5'k. -"t,�„�:,:,,,:",'rsK!a'.',��Se"r'•- .• : :..u• �rtJ,l��f'� `�.W .- ' Au^�'.••..• .��,�....�"�,,.- ��,.,•,�'>;, "f sue. >i,.�.`��v.,s�,E^.. "G µ n��r...�;,{ -.��.s!�(,,fi�, ,.;,p`1 �.b �(.k;",ti� If I. can be of further. ass.istance, please call. . . . Sincerely, , . ,., ,z' ._,.,,,r_;,- ,,i .g_ L• .. . .: . . .• , .. R • ichard Geissler,. Chief: . - ; • ` • . Renton-Fire .:Department • ` RG/cr" iI 't • OFiv R� d. o THE CITY OF RENTON "�' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 40 P40. FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9�r�D SEP-T°#� November 28, 1979 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File Nos. R-434-79; First Church of the Nazarene SP-433-79 Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced rezone request and the special permit request which requires Council approval, dated November 21, 1979. The appeal period for the application expires on December 5, 1979, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven day period from the • date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on December 6, 1979, and will be placed on the Council agenda on December 10, 1979. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, U ` Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner • cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) (�� \�r��-° , being first duly sworn, upon 1, oath disposes and states: That on the day of N�tr'.� 1='..�. , , 19i\ , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this - \ day of N I r,,n_,_ 19 ,� . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at, Renton 0 Application, Petition or Case: R- JV J y (.13 3- )5 (The minutes contain a £ 6 t o g the ptv t i.e,6 o g )tecond) OF RA, „ .. 0 THE CITY OF RENTON V to s Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL.AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.fla055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 09A . ro FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 • 0,94TEO November 30, 1979 • TO: Parties of Record FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: File No. R-434-79; SP-433-79; First Church of the Nazarene • Correction of Clerical Error • With reference to Finding No. 16, it appears 'that the zoning category for the subject,property was correctly identified in the Planning Department Report as "G" (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum Lot Size - 35,000 sq ft) rather than the "GS.-1" (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum Lot Size - 35,000 sq ft) indicated in the above Finding. The error was due to the use of an incorrect version of the Zoning Map. The City's Zoning Map has since been corrected. (See attached) . The error, after reviewing the Examiner's Decision, does not appear to be substantive and therefore would not change the decision. cc: Members Of Council Planning Department • City Clerk • Attachment N, ' . asi . • ...„.....„ ,..... . , • . . ,, . ....= .G , . ..F2-21. ' . • . , , • • i ..4 • • .. • . . . ,--:. . . ........ . .. -.•• L4 . • ._ • .., . • ...,. ,,.. ..,„ . -• "''''•--,•--"••••----"7.1a.-,:.w..,:-••• •.. t •;.. ...--, • R-3 ; i F r17/ OSw . . . . , •:. ,.. ., • et 6 .4.4 . . I/ • G- \-. .,. .„...,..7%,,, ,,.III Si ...! ...: NS �,4,el_q;, -,1' , _t.' .'_irk` - s . / C - • • 111 GT .i • . 4.j,iftli: GS• -1 . .. : . . ' . . , . 1 ,_,_._,_,•_._._._._.. _. _._--� : :: ----� —� • --- 1 1 ' H .:. 41.5' : •-• . ., j' ' �i` . . • ,•• •„` — • ' SR - ! I - . ,1 f N1. : g ... A . . i1l 4 .. • i1 _ 11. .-- • • R-3 - R-3 �_F I , ---+---"r- • 4} B-I , , , • i • I. • ., ,. •, ..• :.• .a . . ,.... i , . . :4_, . . .• ..„.,.. • • . i I._ :. . -.2.i- '' — Tr-- --� -s' 1 . t i � il. rI IL r} i1 11 ' SCALE .1"=800�, ZONE USE MIN LOT ZONE USE MIN LOTi • R-1 Sing. Fam. Res. 7200 SR-2 • Two Fam. Res. 10000 'SECTION SR.1 • • Sing. Fam. Res. '1500 R-3 Mulit-Fam. .Res. 5000 G Sing. Fam. Res. 35000 R-4 Multi-Fam. Res. 5000 G-6000 Sing. Fam. Res. -6000 P-11 Public Use it G-7200 Sing. Fam. Res. ' 7200. B-1 Business PAGE G-8400 Sing. Fam. Res. . .8400. BP Business Parking . G-9600 Sing. Fim. Res. 9600 L-1 Light Industry GS-1 Sing. Fam. Res. 40000 T-1 TrailernParkHeavy ry 11 S-1 _ Sing.. FaM. Res.• R-2. Two Fem. Res. . 7200 M-P Manufacturing Park . • __ _,—..—._.�.�....,n.._E..r,aa•.a'as ni':s ar.�,A4 N..r.. :Ift 1 k-.A`..� * I -A ;i', 7+ ^ ?K 1 ri * *. I..- 1I ';! November 21, 1979 n i s /.{ OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, APPLICANT: First Church of the Nazarene FILE NO. R-434-79, SP-433-79 LOCATION: Vicinity of 850 Union Avenue N.E. , just north of Honeydew Elementary School on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. . SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a rezone from GS-1 to SR-1 and a special permit to construct a church and associated educational facilities. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval of rezone; approval of special '; RECOMMENDATION: permit with conditions. Hearing Examiner: Approval of rezone; denial of special permit. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on November 9, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on October 30, 1979. Responding to the applicant's request for additional time to prepare final elevation plans and drawings, the Examiner continued the hearing until November 13, 1979. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on November 13, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. ° Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Site Plan Exhibit #4: Letter from Fire Chief to Pastor Lowell Welker dated August 23, 1979 Mr. Blaylock corrected the following errors in Exhibit #1: Page 5, Section M. , #6 should read: "Exterior loud speakers shall not be permitted". He also corrected Section I, line 2 on page 3, Population/Employment to read: "It could impact with development of the eastern portion of the site. This will be estimated at the time subdivision is presented. " . The leltter from the Fire Chief to Pastor Lowell Welker was read by Mr, Blaylock. The Examiner requested information as to whether there is a single family home on the lot at the present time that is 100 feet from the church. Mr. Blaylock advised that the home is occupied by the associate minister and is considered H ; `to be parsonage. The Ex miner asked for clarification as to whether a special permit had been applied for, stating it appeared that the applicant is not working under the special permit already approved and that new conditions would be different. i R-434-79 SP-433-79 Page Two Mr. Blaylock responded that a building permit had been issued and the building is now under construction. He stated there is a possibility variances for ad- dition to the church will be sought. The Examiner replied he thought a variance might be appropriate, but he did not have the power to rule and the Board of Adjustment would be the proper authority. Mr. Blaylock requested information as to whether this would be considered a completely new application or would just be an expansion of the church. The Examiner responded that it was his belief that the applicant had chosen not to exercise the previous special permit and is ap- plying for a new permit. He stated that the previous special permit had not been approved by the City Council and that this approval is necessary. The Examiner inquired as to the size of the lot if the applicant complies with set- backs on the east side. Mr. Blaylock responded that it would be approximately 50 to 600 of the remaining portion of the lot. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Lowell Welker 6906 So. 129th Place Seattle, Washington 98178 Mr. Welker, Pastor of the church and president of the corporation, stated that there are unique problems with the lot dimensions. The total lot is 218 feet while it is 1280 feet in depth. In 1977 when the special permit was taken out, the church discovered that there was a 100 foot setback that applies only to churches. On the property to the north there is only one residence that is at all visible and that is on Union Avenue. The rest is a virtual jungle out in the county. Because there are two small dwellings, it is considered residential land and requires the church to set back 100 feet. In this event, only 18 feet would be left on which to build. In 1977 the church had intended to build a steel structure, a square box with a flat roof, but felt it was not attractive and they would not be satis- fied with that type of structure. Also, the original plan did not meet the current requirements for ramps for handicapped people. It was discovered that the redesigning of the steel building would have cost as much as the price of a new design. There was a request from the Fire Dept. that the building be moved forward in order that they could more adequately service the building. The church and the school are in the city and the rest of the property on Union is in the county. The Examiner responded that, according to the provisions of code, Section 4-706(3) a. 3 and 4, setback and landscaping requirements, he does not have the ability to vary requirements and that would have to be done through a variance by the Board of Adjustment. He stated that he may be able to issue a special permit subject to the approval of a variance by the board and also subject to final approval of the proposal by the City Council. Mr. Welker referred to a letter to the Hearing Examiner which stated that the reason they have gone to a rezone is because the area is residential and, should they desire to develop it in the future, it would be easier to take care of both at one time. The Examiner requested testimony in support. Responding was: Robert Zanoni 508 West Main Auburn, Washington 98002 Mr. Zanoni stated that he is in support of the application as builder of the project. The Examiner requested further testimony in opposition. There was none and there were no further comments from the Planning Department. Mr. Welker remarked that when the original permit was issued there was no opposition from neighbors or the community and that the neighbors have seen the building and are much more pleased. The hearing was closed at 9:40 a.m. R-434-79 SP-433-79 Page Three FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a reclassification of ±6.5 acres of property from GS-1 (General; Single Family Residential; 35,000 square foot lot size) to SR-1 (Single Family Residential; 7,500 square foot lot size) and approval of a special permit to permit the construction of a church on the reclassified (SR-1) site. 2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, (is uncontested) , and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The subject property is located in the Highlands section of the city. The subject parcel is ±218 feet wide by ±1,278 feet deep. The site is generally level. The front portion of the subject site has generally been cleared for building purposes. The rear portion of the site has mixed stands of conifers and deciduous trees. 8. The subject site was annexed into the city by Ordinance No. 3058 in August of 1976, and the present zoning classification was applied at that time. On March 29, 1977, the Hearing Examiner approved a special permit to permit the construction of a church on the subject site. On November 5, 1979, a building permit was issued for one phase of construction. The special permit was not approved by the City Council as required by Section 4-706 (3) and the setbacks and landscaping required by Section 4-706 (3) (a) 3 and 4 were not complied with. 9. The applicant proposes developing a church on the portion of the property fronting on Union Avenue NE. The remainder of the parcel would eventually be developed with single family residences. 10. Currently construction of a foundation for a proposed gymnasium is underway. The site is also occupied by an existing residence and a temporary structure used as an office for overseeing the various construction projects. The existing residence is proposed to be used by the church as a parsonage. 11. The site is bounded on the south by the Honeydew Elementary School which is located in the same GS-1 zone as the subject site. The northern boundary of the subject site is also the boundary for the city limits. The property to the north is zoned for single family residential use and a single family home is located on the adjoining site to the north. Across Union Avenue NE, to the west, the property is zoned S-1 (Single Family; 40,000 square foot lot size) , SR-1, and R-1 (Single Family, 7,200 square foot lot size) . 12. Traffic counts have not been derived for church related activities, but estimates based on square footage, seating capacity and required parking indicate that attendance at services would generate a minimum of approximately 180 trips per week (based on the required 90 parking stalls) . 13. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject property is located as suitable for the development of single family residences. Established lot size in the area varies from large multi-acre sites to the more common range between 7,200 square feet and 15,000 square feet. R-434-79 SP-433-79 Page Four 14. Churches meeting certain enumerated requirements are permitted by special permit in residential, including single family zone, districts (Section 4-706 (3) ) . Among those requirements is a setback of 100 feet from all developed property which is located in residential zones; 25 feet of landscaping along all non-right-of-way property lines; parking not less than 25 feet from developed residential lots; and adequate provision for proper traffic flow and circulation (Section 4-706(3) (a) 3, 4, 5 and 8 respectively) . 15. The applicant proposes instead an 18 foot setback from the Honeydew School site to the south; similarly only 18 feet of landscaping; and parking stalls less than 25 feet from a residential lot are to be provided. In addition, there has been no provision left for access to the rear portion of the lot which the applicant proposes to develop separately. Access as presented in the site plans (Exhibit #3) would have to be through the parking area and under a covered drive immediately adjacent to the church. 16. The Planning Department report (Section A; Summary) identifies the zone as G whereas the site is presently zoned GS-1. CONCLUSIONS: REZONE 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3014 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially zoned for the new classification per the Com- prehensive Plan; or c. There has been demonstrated changes in the development pattern in the area since the last rezoning action. The applicant has demonstrated that the necessary criteria to permit the rezone of the subject property has been met. 2. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject property is located for single family development. The applicant proposes to use the property for a combination of purposes, including the eventual construction of single family homes on part of the site, and the construction ofa church on the remainder of the site. Under terms of the zoning code, churches may be established in single family re- sidential zones by special permit and therefore, both proposed uses may be per- missable under the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Adjoining zoning districts in the vicinity are a mix of densities and the proposed classification, SR-1, would be compatible with these surrounding zones. To the west is another small SR-1 zone and an R-1 (Single Family, 7,200 square foot lot size) zone. There is also a G-7200 (Single Family; 7,200 square foot lot size) zone just south of Honeydew Elementary School. 4. The area has been the site of recent developments along Union Avenue NE and the proposed change of zoning classification to SR-1 would be appropriate at this time. Preliminary Hearing Examiner approval of a rezone, also to SR-1, and of a subdivision just north of Kiwanis Park has occurred within the last six months. 5. The area is serviced by both water and sewer and therefore, the potential development will not impact city services or the public health or welfare and the rezone from GS-1 to SR-1 should be approved. SPECIAL PERMIT 6. The applicant for a special peiiuit must demonstrate that the proposal is in compliance with the provisions of the zoning code authorizing the issuance of a special permit. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed church complies with the various landscape, setback, and parking requirements of Section 4-706 (3) (a) . The plans, in fact, demonstrate that the proposal fails to satisfy these requirements. R-434-79 SP-433-79 Page Five 7. The church building will be located within 18 feet of the Honeydew Elementary School property, which is located in the same GS-1 residentially zoned and developed lot as the proposed church (Section 4-706(3) (a) 3) . 8. Also the landscaping and parking as proposed will not meet the requirements of the zoning code. There will be only 18 feet of landscaping on the site along the south property line adjoining the Honeydew site and parking is proposed to be developed also within 18 feet of the property line. Both features violate the requirements of the zoning code (Section 4-706(3) (a) 4 and 5) . 9. The proposed development of the eastern (internal) portion of the site with single family residences will create potential traffic access and safety problems. Currently there is no access to the rear portion of the subject property without first passing through the site of the proposed church and passing under a covered drive immediately adjacent to the church building. Section 4-706(3) (a) 8 requires provision for both actual and anticipated traffic and access problems. The present site development plans would create a landlocked parcel surrounded by large parcels in separate ownership to the north and east, and a large school site to the south. Access through the front portion of the site would be circuitous and hazardous. 10. While the parcel is relatively large, it is too narrow to support the construction of the proposed church. The parcel is only about 218 feet wide. The zoning code, in deference to single family zoned land, requires an expansive 100 feet of setback between proposed churches and single family zoned and developed lots. This re- quires a total setback of 200 feet if adjoining lots on both sides are zoned residential and developed. The subject proposal requires under this provision 200 feet of setback, leaving 18 feet of building space. There is a single family home developed north of the subject property in a King County residential zone and the Honeydew Elementary School developed in a GS-1 residential site immediately south of the subject proposal. The code does not exempt non-residential development from these provisions. 11. Similarly, the proposal cannot comply with the landscape and parking requirements because of the lot size, again providing only 18 feet for parking setback and landscaping. 12. The zoning code does not authorize nor permit the examiner to deviate from the enumerated requirements and therefore the special permit should be denied. RECOMMENDATION: The reclassification of the subject property from GS-1 to SR-1 should be approved. The special permit should be denied. ORDERED THIS 21st day of November, 1979. . ki;AA Fred J. Ka man Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of November, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Lowell Welker, 6906 So. 129th Place, Seattle, WA 98178 Robert Zanoni, 508 West Main, Auburn, WA 98002 TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of November, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney i el R-434-79 SP-433-79 Page Six Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before December 5, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. c) Il 01 El 0 8. I.:1 aa 1.• ' 1 ......................... .....- • • . /0 Ili .,..s,r. 4.0. 1:3 0 r5 1 7-10— 1 n° 0 li::1 ED ci C43 1.,, 111 h:----ip' , -7 631=0 CAI cE) ri 0 6 C% 11 a 0 0 El 1......L21........ [ I ;•-•.---.........1 • 0° 5 11 i--------- .--° ---11 --.1 .. e,r3-2 Hi so vacv.) er.pet:ii cci.1 e.r.lat,ita)mvzo so p,... ,op cr,stfy.f 1100 IMO ji1:11:1—'e 5Pf. ------$.1:1. Sci. '9 a 8 sF. //Geo 1344 0 5.P. ilz a . 5.c. U Z ig:f 0, SI 1 6 iiii I : , -,-.*et,30 ta c=s eV CZAD ez. 111=5111 Cr) a= ce am firm ,0 al atusuo 0 owl "frt2M2)CD 6Z011$CO Ca=1)itg CM313 69 aima .... ammo as =sib Mr I ... .... , ti.mr 1::;;I ftrON PV•Weir i -t1 —.7.it i . ... 44 ....., ....... _____..... kJ6 'le illit.SE F31145- tr" 'OPT/AV tAv4re "4i° ID ':'•r.b"''-i z, , i . RP$61.574,4 0. Ut r' 1 .. 1 t oZIO..51° I Wi I 0,0 $ ....ez 1" ze tre,tudmot. nzi b , ...., 1 Z 1 ‘, C i I''' ' I-14 ir5 ; -nr.....n."*".•-‘,---4' .402 a cms oarz.va el a=e m^i.=cm o•r,r,1 0 E--m'--->o tan,r3 co e.;.;::::.)63, a Ic--.."n ezln.; te3 arz-D CO 111. l' ifittoSIS t % I I i rn r ‘,I gi'Ang ,.., '"-^.. 1\ 1. c...., 1\ .. i v ,.0 • ne I ; - ................., \1 0 : . 16 ;a 0 , AO. asszo ea eszo'i fa .544LE i,"0 4001 I 3015)15Cr prir:. L-1 II_ ... 0 esr no uxall OF 1,1,4 LAils. wit SP- 1433- ricl i ..........J .., , . . . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE TWO J D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The site is generally level. 2. Soils: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6-15% slopes (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries , row crops, and for urban development . 3. Vegetation : The bulk of the subject site has been cleared but mixed stands of deciduous and conifer trees line the perimeter. 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation does provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water : No water was observed on the subject site (October 17, 1979) . 6. Land Use: The subject site is primarily undeveloped. However, one existing single family residence is located on the property together with various accessory structures. Honeydew Elementary School is located directly to the south of the subject site. There are existing single family residences located north of the site and west of the site across Union Avenue N.E. Kiwanis Park is located north and west of the subject site across Union Avenue N.E. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are primarily single family resi- dential with some mixed public/quasi-public uses, F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer: A 12" water main and 15" storm sewer run north-south on Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site, while an 8" sanitary sewer extends east- west on N.E. 10th Street within 700 feet to the north of the property. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Routes 107 and 108 operate along Union Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site. 4. Schools: The Honeydew Elementary School is adjacent to the subject site on the south, while McKnight Middle School is approximately 1i miles to the northwest , and Hazen High School is within 3/4 of a mile to the north- east . 5. Recreation: The grounds of the Honeydew Elementary School and Kiwanis Park provide good opportunities for nearby recreation. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-729, G, General Classification District 2. Section 4-704, SR-1, Suburban Residence District 3. Section 4-706(3) , Churches by Special Permit r- �- . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 13, 1979 - APPLICANT: - FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE FILE NUMBERS : R-434-79 and SP-433-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to SR-1 and a special permit to allow expansion of a church and associated educational facilities. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: RENTON FIRST 'CHURCH OF " THE NAZARENE 2. Applicant : RENTON FIRST CHURCH OF ' THE NAZARENE 3. Location : Vicinity of 850 Union (Vicinity map attached) Avenue N.E. . just north of Honeydew Elementary School on the east side of Union Avenue N.E. 40 Legal Description: A detailed legal descrip- tion is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property: ±6.5 acres. 6 . Access : Via Union Avenue N.E. 7. Existing Zoning : "G" , General Classification District , minimum lot size 35,000 square feet . 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: S-1, Residence Single Family, minimum lot size 40,000 square feet; G, General Classifica- tion District , GS-1, General Classification District , mini- mum lot size 35,000 square feet . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential. 10. Notification : , The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date; notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on October 19, 1979, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on October 18, 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 3058 dated August 24, 1976 , at which time the present zoning classi- fication was applied. On March 29, 1977, the Hearing Examiner approved a special permit for church facilities on the site (reference file SP-003,77) . A building permit was issued on November 5, 1979, for one phase of the church. construction. J PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE FOUR L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. In March of 1977, the Renton First Church of the Nazarene obtained a special permit from the Hearing Examiner to construct a church on a site just north of the Honeydew Elementary School on Union Avenue N.E. The special permit allowed for a church of approximately 20 ,000 square feet set back approximately 300 feet from Union Avenue N.E. and 100 feet from the northern property line. The appli- cant has modified their plans by upgrading the quality of the exterior treatment of the building, moving the struc- ture forward approximately 150 feet and increasing the structure by 6 , 800 square feet to allow a full sized gymnasium. 2. In the original review in 1977, it appears that several points may have not been adequately addressed. First , a minimum of a 100 foot setback is required from any other developed lot which is zoned residential. The Honeydew Elementary School site to the south is zoned GS-1. The property was annexed in July of 1959 and given a GS-1 zoning classification , even though the school was pre-existing on the site. In 1965, the Comprehensive Plan designated the site into a Public/Quasi-Public Land Use Classification. The site was never rezoned to P-1 .because there was never any reason to. The school was already existing. The G zone is still a residential zone. ;, However, in this particular case, it is not developed with residences. Therefore, it is not seen as a requirement in the opinion of the Planning Department . Secondly, the Hearing Examiner in 1977 approved the build- ing location only 18 feet from the southern property line. Section 4-706(3)( a)4. requires a 25-foot landscaping strip along all property lines. It would appear that this is a code requirement that the Hearing Examiner may not have had the authority to modify. However, a building permit has been issued on the site for the construction of a church as originally allowed, and it would appear that the church now has vested interests in the site plan as approved, and the structure is a legal non-conforming structure in regard to setback. 3. The site plan complies with the other requirements as • designated in Section 4-706(3) except for the rear parking lot setback from the southern property line. It will have to be set back 25 feet instead of the 18 feet shown. This will reduce the parking by 4. However, the parking lot is still above the required 90 parking spaces . The size of the sanctuary has not changed from the original plans. Therefore, the parking required still remains the same, 90 parking spaces. 4. The church construction has been divided into three phases. Phase 1 is presently under construction. It is composed of the multi-purpose room/gymnasium. It complies totally with the special permit issued in 1977. Phases 2 and 3 include the sanctuary and the foyer. These are intended to be extended to the west of the original building site. The structure was moved to the west because the exterior treatment of the building was upgraded to cedar finish instead of metal and to allow better access for fire fighting. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE THREE H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : c 1. Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives, pages 17 and 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1.' Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will not have a direct impact on the property. However, subsequent devel- opment will remove the soils, disturbing the vegetation. increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and noise level in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures, however, many of these impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment : Not applicable. 3. Schools : Not applicable. 4. Social: Development of the subject site as a church will provide increased opportunity for social interaction within the area congregation. 5. Traffic : Data on average daily trips (ADT' s) is not available for churches from the Traffic Engineering Divi- sion. Therefore, given an estimate of two trips/week/ parking space, a total of 180 trips/week would result (based on 90 required stalls) . It should be noted,' how- ever, that these trips will all occur at the same time. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1972, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposals (see attached) . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department 6. City of Renton Police Department 7. City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - REZONE : 1. The proposed rezone from G to SR-1 is consistent with the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan, which desig- nates the site and surrounding area as single family resi- dential. 2. The subject site was annexed in 1976. Since that time , no area-wide or site rezoning requests have been considered on the site. 3. Items 1 and 2 appear to comply with Section 4-3014 of the Renton Municipal Code, thus substantiating the proposed rezone. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested rezone from G to SR-1 based upon the compatibility of the proposed use with existing uses and the fact that the site has not been previously considered by an area--7ide zoning review, and being consistent with. the Compre- hensive Plan land use element designation of single family residential. , i1 0 1 m f 11ti. 50�\ • it ��[j�`(y��_� •9,. .....: �s ®00, ai ,. {�� - Y . O 1. i .i • t 1 o.�.m.: %`\\ .,yw , �... .tie,ea , '_` - - _ _ -,----.-.-;,---•1 r :..,0--eb, --„,",-;7-T.:,-,--,,..•,.-t-- •••.,..............i , , 3 •:-,:it•i, .w• . , . -._ .,._ 7...\......__,-,:;.:3„,...,..4 ; l u d a ,t t, Tt Wit. �_� ',• ' '•'1= >4�'ri ; C) • ,x+,' lj ` 1i,("'t1 xµ -��i ,:1. y.` t 1a f FSgy� '�wj1'Sa '` • {r� . I••+.:• 9 1 'T .,.'L 7 r',ti r -Ail' 76 , j .: t �•�lj'-I� '1a o i •I i s' _•M1._..fo4P.1.�tr•..y — '.`c(;`�J ,+° ��il.`vi ,i _.'�,>.+t a , •Y . �•t•f..l 'n ,' •Li:.• s,�• .- ~'ice •?.• � ,-_ --i •; 4rL(. �P Z e�q �rFi_. • 7 1 I I,- •!!I.``.}}i• •. :. •a �--".'\'f'1,e e \`1.'.� l ed 5�:i1: LT1 ' e .1. i , .i ` 1• '','•1 1 ®moom m �� •• -'{�';•-��;E'-:;,,+."�,i;L�..�„4,3....�;';. + k l.i I �iV 1 is , , _ .A Aso-. .- '.•.•:,7-T1 `•y,.' t'j'•.;,-..;:r.--;:;77-71fr , 31 - ccc�� , ,. .\e , Y� . -c .-�.-� • ty�('S S". i F EEEE .�t. ` �JJI�.., '�i- '��Ji 1 ,:,�. - c.r ._'L'' r.�y..• cr;�r: .:-.... ,•,,ei., 6a-v� ,i • •_,i�..a•. :.x I@j• 3�i 7J e • 1 • . ,, . •t' r .§ is 'a w _. - • L14 ' • to �� . i. 9 -1'ti':::';1'.': .. •:e.::•,t.!:f' y i ?{{i •1' } t ,,, 14.rs xr, ...._.' '_)1 tom.'1'a .'. ' �'L_TT �.,._1._t_ cTr .7,--�TT, , J-cp`, 0® - t(`��1�s, _ �: ...1_ •.♦ •I... •+ •,\'`, F.-Ll•:.• . .t- .{ ��!oY�p@� t1 r�w", _ot'Tzs141�� t�tS{IT�---•A"°_L�• » •`.. ••\�`�1. •i �•fi .• .T • a • ''� 1.� OYyy__ppYY. SL„,... ,,, ii lit-�_i^L:ak • S r'''' ''l•: r 7�. -3.' -• . .6'.":•' ::,',". i4-. -�._-..a_---- -•"- mo _ -i 7 -q1 f•-yrtF i 1' .1 I('-"Tr•? f i:7'i. S 1'. * 4 {1{q1/i • C.sJ , + --1 �•.�.•.�a a..l•wary,•t•:t: t.•', l•� •6}'�� n•}'.,•:��-�alI4r: SR-I I. }� { f - •`I �- - iga ' ' I 1» _ ' —..- . r— ' -4-- ;�a,— —t G. .,I .J131 1• ; i I , , ems± Z I — e +i.: iii777 il 1 i 1 REZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT: ' FIRST CHURCH 'OF THE NAZARENE ' 1 , 1 APPLICANT FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE TOTAL AREA ±6. 5 acres I PRINCIPAL ACCESS Union Avenue N.E, # EXISTING ZONING G, General Classification District I 1 EXISTING ,USE One single family residence/undeveloped. PROPOSED USE Expansion of a church and associated educational facilities. ' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential COMMENTS . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE REZONE/SPECIAL PERMIT NOVEMBER 13, 1979 PAGE FIVE 5. A revised landscape 'plan has not been submitted. However, care should be taken to insure. that proper screening is required to reduce the visual impact. The church has been set back the same distance from Union Avenue N.E. as the Honeydew Elementary School to be compatible with the school instead of dominating that side of the street . 6. Many large significant evergreen and deciduous trees exist on .the site from the house eastward to the property line. Retention of the trees should be encouraged as part of the total landscape and development plan. 7. A screen fence was suggested as a possible addition along the northerly landscape strip; however, propery landscap- ing will be more effective than a fence. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested special permit , file number SP-433-79, subject to the following conditions : 1., Revision of. the landscaping strip on the southern boundary of the rear parking to a width of 25 feet. 2. Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscape plans including the revisions noted in "L" and the retention of existing. trees wherever possible. Removal of trees shall be subject to prior approval of the Renton Planning Department in accordance with detailed landscape plans. 3. Final Planning Department approval •of screening methods along the north and south property lines. 4. Posting of a bond or other approved means of insuring proper landscaping installation and maintenance as per ordinance requirements. 5. Parking lot lighting shall be of low height and intensity tc reduce glare and light intrusion to adjacent single family residence. 6. Exterior loud speakers shall be permitted. 7. The. portion of the site not developed at this time shall be retained in its natural state, and any future plans • for this area shall be approved by the Examiner. The purpose of these requirements is to reduce the impact of the proposed development in the adjacent single family residences and retain the general character of the area. BY 3:UU PM ON fylVi' v9 _ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT) VISION : / ,� i/��t/ - i /06 41EE.//U6_K_ , Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved lam' / Signature ofi Director or Authorized Representative Date nrvTruTma nFPARTh1FNT-/I)LVz_S ON :- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: — ' Parks and Recreation Approved Approved with conditions Not Ap proved • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT;DIVISION: - - — D J1`f� __ /X) Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved /6)--- Si onature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e V - - ..-. ._..- .. ------...--------------- - -ate REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : --. Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved 0 • • i gnature of pi rector or' Aut ioTi zed Representati ve Date . ;:enton Planning Department'-' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : i d '2_94 weema,etalowrOA,X -770 cv P ___SA f 1 Location : 6 4 4 { iceGIell 0piffeeE;' Applicant : Pfr # c, � � Q o WQ 1. 4 _ ,_ fit _ TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATEL '..79 Po`iice Department A, R, CaMEETING. k 7 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering , .,.,,,.v.: ,,...,:, ' V., fluilding Division l Utilities Engineering ► f Fire Departr;oiit t • ;;''/!// IN MITNI I^dOR Sf;�GTESTI}O'�'�I FARAcArIoN IN6 THIS A9P ,I CAT IOP SHOULD a JJ pp ZOVIDED EV :I! COIF.REN( E (ARC)FLOORI0 3E= HELD ON l5 /linn Al 9:01) AM IN _THE THIRD CONFERENCE ROUT'„ F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE lV LL NOT BE ABLE TO ATT N THE ARC, PL ASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE FLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: UO PM ON y/gi7 + REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:__ n/ �) --...r__ /N.Approved Approved with conditionis . Not Approved (1.-__ \ Signature of Di-) ector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:_____ ti_ ___ Approved ,X Approved with conditions _—__Not Approved ) ,2,4,1,j'e-r. - 7,40v-o-ese 64-'' 02-8`4"vs"-° ,--4"- — , • c' E .7: ___ 72 -7-±fIL,--- /043/.. . Signature of Director oi• Ilutho rizcd 1,cpresentati e Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved _ . 1lpprovh2d with conditions ti ons __Not Approved PROPOSED/FINAL CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE )N—SIGNIFICANCE R-434-79 Application No . SP-435-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-514-79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezone. of 6 . 5 acres from "G" to "SR-1" and expansion of church facilities by 6 , 800 square feet . Proponent FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE Location of Proposal 850 Union Avenue N.E . Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is madOtis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : 1. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan and Policies. 2. Meets all mitigating measures of Zoning Ordinance. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Offi ial David R. Clemens Title S nior Planhe ;7 Date November 9 , 1979 Signature CCU;.(' ^� �C6 ' r. • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 114 mac,:. I. yr`Ra-1y C. _�" ,.r _ `� : '- Sys 850 UNION AVENUE NORTH EAST -RENTON, WA 98055 - PHONE: 271-5206 -- P oit: M.nU : (36 N8V: - LOWELL D. WELKER WTLL7AM K. HARMAP6ING Phone: 772-2815 Phone: 226-4085 October 24, 1979 Mr. Fred Kaufman Office of the Nearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, VA 98055 RE: Firs Church of the Nazarene Files R-434-79 SP-433-79 Dear Sir: This let er is in reference to the request by the church to extend our church facility at 850 Union Avenue North East and to rezone the property. Because of unavoidable circumstances, the front) elevation plans and drawings needed in our presen- tation will not be available for the public hearing scheduled _ for October 30, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. We, therefore, respectfully request that the public hearing.be continued until November .13, 1979. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Your Servant in Christ, Lowell Wei ker, � , :. .• • Pastor-pr sident ( �,� LW/ag ` ` cc Planning Department of City of Renton ; ,Y, ; ;i ;-' 9 — f /• fr(\!f� ` t • J • , . • . . ,.. ._ . . • . _ . . • .. . • ...„ • • . ., „ . . • . . ,..: • II . ' - • • . . .. .. . • P , _, i.-,:.-,-„. • . •• '. :-- . . I _ . .. .. . ,.., -ii.--- -,.-- . .--. ;•- - . 1, .N....,• • 1, :, --\ ' „ I I ' • - • . . ,_ -,.•_: .,...:::••••:, .....:--..„.-•-I t....-. ....-=—_-_'-',',..,..s,., '''.-.' .. :.„.„.=• ..„-,-ii I . . -q 1 . . T, \ I 1,---. ' 1•••---"----:- _7.-- , 1 ... Ii i'-'7P-..--=.7.1 • ‘.."....i .. .•,,, , • ; r • , '. • :!- •••••_,,------:- • 1 --C . . . . ,, / '- • . . • . . .• p I-1 A .r ', • , , --PflASE 2- ., --P I-1A SE 3 1 / . ,.—, ,,,,..,,... , • , ',: .. ,. , , • ,, . •• , ••. •• l• • =.-,,: • 1 . .-._._.. • . . . f i -I . ....... . . • . •. • • 7 r,--,-•,•• ..: • • • .. .. i . . . . . .• •• .. . ._ _.. „ • . . . • ut..)zery CoN3STgOCTXD/J 1 . .• .- . . . • , -,, .." ,..?- •!. :.,, .. • . • • . 1 •••.:• •.'/ -::- . , . . . ;: •.?..... • . . •- ". • •• -•- • - - • . . . -• - _...,1.„ " .. --- - . ----''7•-,1=-;•- . . • ' :::'•f"‹.:. ''. . " —.C• ,..,`,..r, .!., !--, i,!.7. '....i:.•1 : ..--''''' ''''':-= :-. .'I :.: -"-.... •-..".• - -c- • ... .. ....,.... .w.:................... ......_,.. r..... ,..... _.,_,._, • .... •: , —-. . . ..! ',........../ !- . . .• . . .• ••• • . • . ..-. • ! ! II I . . ' • • • . • •" '-.• -' ''.•- ' ,t.“,,,, ,- -'-',,-•-•.•7., '.., ,.,.,',;:...,-7.....:•,:i : I Ltr.., :' i ',•-•'„'l: ',, - --_-•--=,-_,_-..-:-. ....,,,..:.,...•-.1-. . .. —.. ._.--.- .- . . - . ---• ' :' .,_ • . . <•;41i, i, ' • ! ',-7.-i,';'' !I • c,...•.-• ,••T--,. i ••:•';:i:I :.. • . . f ''':601°C11.9 • .. • • -- . , 7,,,. c• . r 11,a . ..• .._• - chupdA coo ...•• • •••. . .• s-P-- 1133 - 75 , iv, ! • _._ __••___ s003-7 7 . _ 1 . --...-.---- • A aD wry o T H IR CITY OF ENTON ®® F 4-'# MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 nma amp 4 '� �, CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9.0 - 235- 2550 • O �P 9�TF0 SEP�c_��` ` October 24, 1979 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner RE: F RST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE R ZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT REQUESTS R-434-79 and SP-433-79 As requested by Pastor Lowell Welker of the First Church of the Nazarene in his letter of October 24, 1979 , public hearings relating to the subject. appli- cations Will be continued to November 13th. RJB:wr . OF R4,A A. •t o THE CITY OF RENTON 4$ 0 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 a CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 235- 2550 0,9gT�O SEP-C°' October 17 , 1979 First Church of the Nazarene 246 North Wells Renton , Washington 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATIONS FOR REZONE FROM G TO SR-1 , File R-434-79 , AND SPECIAL PERMIT* TO CONSTRUCT CHURCH AND ASSOCIATED EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IN SR-1 ZONE , File SP-433-79 ; property located at 850 Union Ave. N.E . Dear Sirs : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on October 8 , 1979 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for October 30 . 1979 at 9 :00 a.m. • Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director c� By : t q • `IJI. lA Wit. Rog r J . Blaylock' Associate Planner - --- •--' '-- .---'- - ..-•- '-....-, 4..• - . ,,,,, - , . . i,! ' ' , 0 . . • .-:,". ' .. . , . . „-` . . . . , . •-,,_ - .; ., ' ' 'el.- .' •,'' . •4041:., ,t,,Ail;k1', ,.. . '4'1:'.4•N• •'::' i.',Ao.,..t:i 1? . , I, ''.•••' II:: *L; • 4.:1 ; • 4%, " " '; frAi • .1! ,f 1., , • . ti- ,., silt . ..,, 1 t , o4r )w; ...5 ,..,,;,,f 0. • WA'-,, .;:;j1 •. ', Aft' 4.-t :'%. V4 ki ei 434-,?, ''''`t 1. •AriAff , , r AVit ''''•' 'Ve.;,...,,,,,,a IC ..-44 'i;:r. 'N;,•4441tr; ..:*,,:-...N.4./,', . . ;•.'. .• A .,' . . t • . It • , - '',P'4'4 .";•` ::,;• ; A , --44 ' • t, / , . pc , '';;;,." A4.. ; . ,Illipz #. , .14, it$ +to „• „ "p",,,.: ) '''',1..,',' f'.'.i it,....' ti: 71.1, 4,,:‘,:,,..., L'i, ,,," ,-4'4.'''• ',:' :,,-`'!:,' A ‘,,,. ; ,„:.,;,....I..* .'." ' c''....i1,,. ..f.,'0).,t ..'1 ''',., 44:. :''• ''. , 46 4'.. , :,'•O• , tie utiif 4 1'',4' .1.• NO` ,,,,, .‘oci .::'. -''.- t• 1 . :4 F* .41,:fi '::"' ••.•4---' ‘#.. t4E,r4 ,,' , , .1S:! '.,:',!. ''''•.. : ': '.4,1'.4*:,.4,1 :i:1 ,,,,!,,.. El ".;*.;:4' i..;,,, 4,, : 0,' r4, I" • , . G.IFNEFiAL LOCA10 : AND On ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED At . 350 UNION AVE NE . LEGAL. DESCRIPIION: KRAElliK LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF APPLICATION ARE ON FILE IN • . THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT , . , . . • , - . , . Ilii • , . ' , 'I . . . , . , ., i/ •, . , . •t !, ,.... II),'S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY ,,,.,WNERS OF • ii I; • • . . .,,r4rrt • r• } .I..ar -- • 11 ' -• .1:7 ..,:.4 . ; , :" :'; L4.,r,12 •-..; ‘,5.41,0 , i :. ••.;;Ic4,:` ,.. • ...4,4 11 1; :: l'h 2..-,. • •4 v.t, -.0„ 4", Fey;',! ;II I J TO B E HELD . v . IN CITY "COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNik,rPAL BUILDING ON • ,, BEGINNING AT 9 • . . . . 00...A..E....... • Ed firaNCERUNG Lriffr.M 7, , e . ,K, 1 Ar - ..4-„. q• -Trza p '' =70(f11 ‘,,;,',i,s, . FROM 6 TO SR-I,FILE R-434-79 1 I ttr"N•,,,t,a p• F- if*:1,. ,t,,,,, 7,. n:4--„---:.-- (,•• 4, - ; Asiottv . , ,,,„„,,,, •....,,, i ,1,, 'ma , . , , V— ' :'*1 ''''l APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT IN SR-1 ZONE. !I I; FILE SP-433-79 ni • pv• eh , rte.,. ,se 0 . , w .,._„37,,,,, , - Irk ..7 r 4F 21 Ne12' 11 I :1 r ti H411 1 0 vu ',AT ,. , g t ,., • i .1 . .:- .,,,,,, a ,i-'r ;4, ' ',. 'ti.. '1.., 0,•%.! « '''''''""""7 r"..lt 1,4, ni t!,;174,71141. ' :, /4,,z% , , 1 ,,...h1,- ,„ r&g %I a ii,..„1 ,, I,. - ,,. . ward, "- .•!,-41,11-kis 1.,.kip., ;'. '.. w U`thii---Al ‘i.tr%''''k,M , I ' , li . ,„ It.-pu; •-' ': ''' ' , El , I : , I 1( li 1 till Pia FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 23 2550 ,, , THI3 NOTICI E NOT TO ,,,,i.E RIVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORI2A7.0.0i1, ., .. i, . ..,\, - . .. .•,''-‘'.-: :. : .,•':,. - -:.:,.,.•.' .‘.,: •;.-.,,,,,,.,.::('.:;.•,,...•:-,.,...,. .,,... •,,..--..„r., I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON OCTOBER 30 19 79 , AT 9:00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO SR-1, File R-434-79; property located at 850 Union Ave. N.E. 2 . FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CHURCH AND ASSOCIATED EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IN SR-1 ZONE , File SP-433-79 ; property located at 850 Union Ave. N.E. 3. PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT CO. , METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, INC. , NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CO. (VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, SUBDIVISION NO. 1) , APPLICATION FOR FOUR-LOT 25-ACRE INDUSTRIAL SHORT PLAT, File 431-79 ; property located on Lind Ave. S.G . between S.W. 16th St. and S.W. 19th St . Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 30, 1979 AT 9:00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED October 19, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before one , a Notkry Public , on tIe / 7day of �! ` (t 0 I 19 7 ( . SIGNED AP/ z- • , -L -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal) : 850 Union Ave. N.E. (formerly 11806 Union (132nd) S.E.) on approx. 220 x 500 ft. of cleared land. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : i 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: YI.�S' t-i A Y in 6 s el ,EX,.r77/ 1 - #00.r.C.- • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: rW/A • II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS . (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic . substructures? x 1 YES MAYBE 0— (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil? I YES MAYBE NO . (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x Yam- MAYBE AT- (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? x Y MAYBE WU— (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? x YES MBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x YES MAYBE 0- Explanation: ' Compactable soil will be introduced for parking ,and backfill. t � f • Y f CITY OF RENTON/ WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM47 r O i- r Cd kK 09,1' /918 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - I Application No. Environmental Checklist No. -"do PROPOSED. date: FINAL , date: • Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance • ElDeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCM, requires all state and .local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals,. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major,actions si,gffificantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you :can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe- an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or_studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal'. not just to the license for which • you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed. , even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will 'allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a•standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of. Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal .- If a question does-not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the • next question. ENYIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . a BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent First Church of "the Nazarene--Renton 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: • 2146 N. Wells Renton, -Win. 98055 271-3206 3. Date Checklist submitted 4,. Agency requiring Checklist S 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Renton First Church of the Nazarene • 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements. and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Construction of Church and Educational facilities --approx. `L/ `/t/rd sq. ft. plus parking for/0 Vcars. • -4- (5) Fauna. Will the, proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YEBFITTET NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES. MAYBE NO • (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna'? X YES MAYBE Nb— (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YET— MAYBE NO Explanation: • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YES MAYBE TO-- Explanation: Parking lighting • (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land, use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation; (9) Natural Resources. , Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MITE NO • Explanation: Utilities (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of, hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE WO-- Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population • of an area? YET— MAYBE NO Explanation: -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YET— MAYBE (b) The creation of objectionable odors? Y€y— MAYBE Ffi (c) Alteration of air movement. moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? yr MAYBE Explanation: • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: ' (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X Y MITE"BE F• (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES— MAYBE R• (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE W (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YET— RUNE 0 (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE WIY— (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?. X YES MAYBE MU— (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X ' Y RAT Fr (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available • for public water supplies? X Y1 MAYBE , WU— • Explanation: Surface water drainage will be installed for parking area. (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flOra (including trees, shrubs, grass. crops, - microflora and aquatic plants)? Y1V FiAYB€ ff0 (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X wt.— 1' F115— (c) Introduction_of new species of flora into an area, or _ - • in a barrier\to the normal replenishment of existing species? X Y1 MAYBE NU— (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? vry_ Ff_E Fx Explanation: Landscaping �.iVi� gM 1 , • • • • -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? • x YES MAYBENO (e) Storm water drainage? x YES WET 3 (f) Solid 'waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: public building needing the extention of these services (17) ' Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? x YES MAYBE NN Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result- in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to-the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x YES- MAYBE ND • Explanation:. (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x YES ATT0 Explanation: (20) Archeological Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the, above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful.lack of furl disclosure on my part. Proponent: err signed 1-01.4.41t i D, to.gLKE R. (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department • b-76 I N • . , J. -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? x YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? x YES M YBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE W- (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x YET- MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X VET- WEE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , • bicyclists or pedestrians? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The normal increase in vehicular traffic. (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or • result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? x YES MAYBE Nrr (b) Police protection? X YES UTTE NO (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? x YES RATITE NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x YES WATIgt NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X • YET- MAYBE N Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? x YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? ✓� " l`' l/' x y � i q YES � NO (c) Water? ii,_ 3.,i , i_. v YES MAYBE NO tziL G DER r)' , CITY OF RENTON j 0� RE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT � M)\--(KWl ®C`i S ........ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY qA'lii P4` File No . SP- cJ,�7 Date Rec' d. Application Fee $ Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name First Church of the Nazarene Phone 271-3206 Address 246 N. Wells Renton, WA 98055 2. Property location 850 Union Ave. N.E. (formerly 11806 Union (132nd) Renton, Washington 98055 3. ' Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Parcel A: North 100 feet of North half of south half of southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter located in Section 10, township 23 North,, Range 5 East, W.M. . in King County, Wn: Except porf;�n l�ir,a�T;+hin Parcel B: North half of south half of southwest quarter of northwest quvtAr of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Wn: . Except the north 100 feet thereof and except the south 110 feet thereof, and except portion lying within 132nd Ave. S.E. 4 . Number of acres or square feet 6 - acres. Present Zoning G 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? A Church building and Parking facilities. (Expansion of original church by 14,400 square feet.) 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . . . 1" = 10 : C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining , Excavation *and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above . sit 7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. \NN, 1-77 " A AFFIDAVIT 1 , pc/u/b J (!we pchf cif-' r,��,� pUb2Ai•k✓.�- , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 2? day of / 06- , 19 ?? ► Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at �0\�u .1 AO:cr \\al (Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner tvfe-ts RUC ,tl o iw (Address) (Address) row G (City) (State) 7/-_3-Z 06 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application h�be:enn respected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in eerliEiecular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Ren nOF1 n g Qe artment governing the filing of such application . lt Date Received , 19 By: . ,�9n,._ PC/ Ren ton fanning Dept . • 2-73