Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA74-760 (1)
U . ' s: . PUBLIC NOTICE - ` , ,,,75- • • • PUBLIC HEARING (d1t-e ✓ ' CITY OF RENTON �� � PLANNING ' COMMISSION ..?„ . ) A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION ' IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON September 24 , 1975 , at 8 : 00 p .m. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM • " DESCRIBED BELOW: • , • fr SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION : SCARSELLA BROS . , INC . : Appl . No . SP-760-74 , special permit to allow filling and grading in M-P zone ; property located approximately . 1200 .feet north of S .W . -43rd Street on West Valley Highway. 1 o • // — 1I �— ,• 1 — :S ------ --- -- — -- I'-_—_ 1 li 3 I I. G / W ' , - LL k \,,\ \ ri I 2 L' 4 I S ! z i, . a iL 1• 11 J � t2. "' / IIrkI I ' ne,47 4e 4S 44 43 42 + r / i0. 12r- -1 -I .� :�. W' SCARSELLA BROTHERS , INC . P • • '�_---- � .�j •/� W Pl ter_•--T — d a' `� SPECIAL PERMIT �` • ` I• . (( • ,iiCk'.. ' ' ',' ''' 1 _i_____, ___.___ __.______(kn-. ,- -1 --.1--_ _l___: I O I U !I 1 Ia , .I I I V l', 1 • I ; ' .. 11 I i I 1 reTy H sW I 1 • ' V1 1-1 I \\ • v THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT • COMMENTS IN WRITING. IF ADD•.ITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT: CITY OF RENTON — PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550 • MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE, S; RENTON, WA. 98055 1 - , ' • . # , I . . , . 1,-TEM•NM 1•1111111illp MI S I ra.I Ma 10 . . ilINIE1111111111181•IiI111141=1.0.2.8816 . , . 1-1'-'711 • I. . ' I '?z • • '' ' I I • i,2 . 'I '1' . , .. .. I ' bl I • I . 1• Il .\l I . .• 1 1 L •T _1 __-- -.' - 1_.(11}- I R , , . I _.-_-.— I _ , • , ./' LX, , i , . , II i 2 ti r/ (::„ l', 1: -.1 Id 3 c; 4 i 2 2 B Rr- k . i . . .. • . . . , :•,...„.--1 -. . I Ics „ • • : . •• . w . — .—> • .• , I I • ____ ___ .9 i /6 17 18 19 20 21 ',.I. /I ! • J—._I I t ' ) 411 L n, <1 ,. I . . , . ". . „I • .i ' k I , ' 1 • .• . -T- , 71i 48 47 46 45 44. 43 42 I • I I I ' 1 I,"“.• 4 i 4 0 ' ../ .( i - .. j ..' .--"I'n I if. I • _ -7.- —...-7.1---- -----I--- — ---• 7._.___/__-7 ,:is '' '•/ • / • 1- ./0/ Sr...1.,..a "I • . SCARSELLA BROS. , INC. 4:?'" . — ,.-- I ' .., iw • .• :-/ \\N:: 2 l',1, . ,, • /4,- ' .....•:'...i. /•0 , li,, SPECIAL PERMIT \ • .IA= •'••••61•••No(7 ___ _ az. 81 1 BO 79.•4re 77 76 1 1 'es ---- 1 I . . 1 . 1 1 T. t ,..,, ,, . .. , . . \, .• 1, 1 t.," • . . t. 1 • I J h 1 I /. \I 1 . I .._—: 4 ,. • .m....m I1 • ,,..•;.--- . . F--71 1 ' )z" 0.&I / , 11: 1111 lining!' 1 114 L. .. 4_...,• Mgr , •' - I yille, .II i I. .1 7 m—p • 1 1. . . Oz. 1 1 . . 1 . . \d. . i 1 ...- • . . • . ' . _ . . 1 SPECIAL PERMIT'PERMIT APPITCATrON:i _ SCARELLA BROS . , INC.. ; . . - property located approximately 1200 feet north of S .W.I43rd Street bn-16-it-Vairey- HighWay. , . ___.. , . .. . Appl . No . SP-760-74; special permit to allow filling and grading • in : 'M/P zone; property as listedabove . . .....mm APPLICANT SCARELLA BROTHERS , INC TOTAL AREA s si Acres • , ' PRINCIPAL ACCESS West Valley. Highway • . EXISTING ZONING ... M-P : . . . . . EXISTING USE ' Undeveloped. • • . Fill site , for office bldg. & construc- • . PROPOSED USE tion repair shop & outside storage area @ E . end of site . ' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Light Industrial or Mannforturimg . Pnvk • . - COMMENTS _ . • The site contains a rather large pond which is a habitat • • for numerous waterfowl . . • . . . . .. • ' . , • • _ . . . . . . ' ', ' • . . , . • • • . . • '. • .. . . . . ., . • • . • • • - • " ' ' • • . , , . - . • • . .. . _ • BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE SPECIR � USC PERMIT SP - 760- 71/ IN (j - ZONE 3'6- 7y 'EF.' IZ• `759-741 ii SGARSE �I. A l3ROS . 4 j . MAPS h o,I6 i . ' 7°- ci 76 •' Awsza t'-`1/0 e I', e2 -s ,9 .� �'� . \\ wy S.--w.----w:«,.—.—a�.�.—.r.�.r-.—.�.-�. Ii„ I � 1 II �/ 11 77 . fW 1 // // --- o o I) �� 4 °� I G - d1 (' - Z 1,\ Ids ; - :�j> -+e 1 J , „ . 0 , \ ,- . - B ' P' ' ' . , ,, , \ a a i1 o ��y�� to 1- 1 T.- 1 _1 I-.. �`� ,I ` � N -- --—_..._—_.—. . /..4. �+—+i.—.*....—?a.—s-.-.-.-.T.—.—, - _- ..- _ .- .1, a , 1 h „ '. f 9 1 1 a I 1 /d pI J 48,91 44 9' 44 .3 42 7 J 4 I '41 Q I I 1 ' y.0 %/ o ,, , SCARELLA BROTHERS , INC . . Yt /," ,, , _41115_,..,/ �0 \ ',`,,, REZONE ; SPECIAL PERMIT °� I s 100l „. ,N �1 (( • _ • • II 1 5 U .III , I . i 1 1 .51 \ I 1 3 , • • i J I 1 i 1 _ L ! 1,1 ...1:_iir , � _ M-P III! �1••1T�� S Ill..—,sr �I I '[ , I N-- i 2 n. /i //I 1_______.,-,1 1 i „,,, , - ,.._ . 7....,,,___,3e.__.— \.,.;\ I 1 ,o REZONE APPLICATION AND SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION : SCARELLA BROS . , INC . ; Appl . No . R- 759- 74; rezone from G to M/P ; property located approximately 1200 feet north of S . W. 43rd Street on West Valley Highway . AND Appl . No . SP- 760-74; special permit to allow filling and grading in G (M/P) zone ; property as listed above . T APPLICANT SCARELLA BROTHERS, INC _ TOTAL AREA S 8) Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS West Valley Highway EXISTING ZONING G EXISTING USE Undeveloped Fill 'site , $ rezone to M/P for office bldg. & construc- PROPOSED USE tion repair shop & outside storage area @ E. end of site . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Light Industrial or Mannfar-tVring Park COMMENTS Proposed plans are in agreement with the comprehensive plan . The site contains a rather large pond which is a habitat for numerous waterfowl . _ r Anton City Council age 3 12/8/75 I,ORRESPONDENCE - Continued illiam G. Moran Councilman Perry left the Council Chambers and took no part in any Rezone discussion nor in any action regarding this matter. Upon inquiry Continued by Councilman Stredicke, Planning Director Ericksen noted rezone would allow applicant to convert existing home to duplex and is across the street from R-3 zoning; that if used for any other purpose must go before the Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. Isle & Lake Addn. Letter from Planning Director Ericksen further reported Planning Com- Pickle Final Plat mission recommendation for Council approval of Final Plat of Lyle L. #FP-846-75 Pickle for Isle and Lake Addition, a residential subdivision located on the north side of N. 38th St. between Lake Washington Blvd.: N. and Park Ave. N. The letter noted existing use as one single family - residence with proposed use of- nine lot single family residential subdivision, being in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan and noted conformance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance for the two acres. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND REFER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR PROPER ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Renton Management Letter from the Renton Management Association donated $100 for flood Association relief to help alleviate suffering and hardship of community members; Donation donation being forwarded to the Maple Valley Flood Relief Fund. Street Vacation Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason reported cost analysis , N.W. 5th between used in determining fair value for that portion of N.W. 5th Street Lind & Stevens N.W. between Lind Ave, N.W. and Stevens Ave. N.W. , proposed street vacation requested by Gary Vigoren. The total 12,000 sq. ft. is listed at $5,800 with half testimated value $2,900, the cost for each of the four abutting property owners is calculated at $725. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER TO THE LEGISLA- TION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Flood DamageLetter from Public Works Director Gonnason 'submitted preliminary Cedar River damaged caused by recent Cedar River flooding which is being coordi- nated with State and Federal agencies to effect Disaster Fund applica- tions. Bank erosion between Logan Ave. bridge and mouth of Cedar River $50,000; bank erosion upstream from Logan Bridge $10,000; Park Depart- ment- landscaping $10,000; wash-out upstread from half-bridge $30,000 to $40,000; gravel deposits at mouth of Cedar $300,000 to $400,000; May Creek $50,000, total estimate from $450,000 to $560,000 food damage. The letter reported preliminary investigations indicate no structural damage to any of the City's major bridges and structures including the Library and City Hall ; also reporting diversion works around Springbrook Watershed operated successfully. The letter noted the Department was hopeful that a substantial portion of repairs may be accomplished by Disaster Relief Funds. RECESS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Council recessed at 9:10 p.m. and reconvened at 9:30 p.m. All Council- men were present at Roll Call . OLD BUSINESS Community Services Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report regarding Appeal by Scarcella Brothers of Planning Commission Community Services decision of partial fill permit, reporting study made of issue Committee Report involved and the Soil Conservation Service recommendations. The committee report recommended that the Council concur in the request Scarcella Bros. Inc. of the applicant and allow the landfill and that the applicant work Appeal of Planning with the Planning Department on the landscaping requirements. MOVED Commission Decision1BY S.CHELLERT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION Re Landfill 1OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE .* Discussion ensued wherein Coun- cilman Grant noted Soil Conservation representative Bill Cokel.y' s comments that S. C. S. would not object to specific alternate _wetland areas. . Alan Austin, 1515 Norton Blgd. , Seattle, representing Scar- sella .Brothers, Inc.. questioned landscaping required and noted favor- cable attitude toward voluntary contribution to preservation and main- . tenance of wildlife habitat in lieu of landscaping if a savings was ' realized. Councilman Stredicke noted existence of fund for wildlife ' preservation and also noted reduction which could be made in landscap- ing with resultant savings to be contributed to the preservation of , wildlife habitats. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL AMEND MOTION TO CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE 1 BY DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL DOES FIND IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT BUT SINCE DEVELOPER HAS PRESENTED LANDSCAPING PLAN TO THE CITY THIS IS MITIGATION FOR LOSS OF WILDLIFE HABITAT.** Grant further explained this would meet SEPA reai,irements: Council would overturn Plannina Commission OLD BUSINESS - Continued Page 4 12/8/75 Scarsella Appeal decision; developer has proposed landscaping over and above ordinance Continued - requirements and in lieu thereof he may include sum of money to be used for other wildlife habitat. Planning Director Ericksen used map to explain landscaping proposed. AMENDMENT TO MOTION CARRIED.** :. MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED.* Contribution to Councilman Grant presented check for $25 from Mrs. Clarissa Fawcett Green -River.,, for..Preservation of Green River Wildlife Habitat. MOVED BY- STREDICKE, Wildlife Fund SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL ACCEPT CHECK FOR DEPOSIT IN WILDLIFE FUND. ' CARRIED. Committee of Whole Council President Pro tem Perry presented Committee of the Whole report Report •. recommending that the matter of the Cedar River Master Plan be referred Cedar River to the Community Services Committee. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY Master Plan SCHELLERT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REPORT AND CEDAR RIVER MASTER PLAN BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Parking on The Committee of the Whole report recommended that the parking problem Burnett Ave. S. on Burnett Ave. be referred to the Public Safety Committee for review. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REPORT AND REFER MATTER OF PARKING PROBLEM ON BURNETT AVE TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR REPORT BACK. Following discussion, Motion CARRIED. - Downtown Parking The Committee of the Whole report noted regarding the matter of parking for the downtown area, the Committee recommended that the Public Works Director be authorized to present the parking problem to the downtown merchants and report back to the Council their response. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE OF WHOLE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Rainier Ave. The Committee of the Whole report recommended that the referral re changing the name of Rainier Ave. to Renton Ave. (S.Grady Way to City limits) be placed on the next Committee of the Whole agenda. MOVED BY GRANT, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. Logan Ave. Signal MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, THAT THE MATTER OF SIGNAL LIGHTS Lights ON LOGAN AVE. N. AT 6th, 7th AND 8th WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN PROPOSED STREET VACATION BY THE BOEING COMPANY,BE REFERRED TO THE TRANSPORTA- .TION AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR DISCUSSION. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THE SUBJECT OF Marina • CITY OPERATED MARINA ON LAKE WASHINGTON TO THE PARK BOARD. CARRIED. Council Position Council President Pro tem Perry reported Committee recommendation that Committee of the Whole interview candiates for Council position which will be vacated January 12, 1976 when Councilman Delaurenti assumes office of Mayor, that the meeting be held 12/18/75 and dead- line for applications to be filed with Council President be 12/15. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION Special Meeting OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE TO MEET WITH CANDIDATES. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL SET SPECIAL MEETING FOR COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AT 8:00 PM, DECEMBER 18, COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CARRIED. Fire Master Plan Councilman Schellert requested written progress report from Fire Chief Williams prior to 1/12/76 re Master Plan for Fire Protection. VOUCHER APPROVAL MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO. 7195 THROUGH NO. 7300 (WHICH HAVE RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION AS TO MERCHANDISE RECEIVED OR SERVICES 'RENDERE:D)- IN THE AMOUNT OF $121 ,914.53, PLUS LID #291 REVENUE FUND WARRAND #R-7 IN AMOUNT OF $2,127.60 PLUS CASH FUND WARRANT NO. C-9 IN AMOUNT OF $2,127.60. MOTION CARRIED. Vouchers No. 7188 through 7194 were machine voided during processing. ORDINANCES Legislation Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report Ordinance No. 2987 recommending second and final readingsfor an ordinance rezoning Rezone G to B-"1 the Gary Moritz property from G to B-1 (First reading 12/1/75) . Moritz Property Following second reading of -the ordinance rezoning property located on Union Ave.. N. E. next to Mobil Station, it was MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: Six Ayes : DELAURENTI, PERRY, .CLYMER, BRUCE,. GRANT AND SCHELLERT; One. No: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance No. 2988 The Legislation Committee report presented an ordinance for second Inner Harbor Line and final readings, annexing to, the City properties located north Annexation of the Municipal Airport created by the relocation of the Inner / - O LDUSI BNESS - Continued Page 4 12/8/75 Scarsella Appeal decision; developer has proposed landscaping over and above ordinance Continued requirements and in lieu thereof he may include sum of money ,to be used for other wildlife habitat. Planning Director Ericksen used map to explain landscaping proposed. AMENDMENT TO MOTION CARRIED.** MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED.* Contribution to Councilman Grant presented check for $25 from Mrs. Clarissa Fawcett Green River for Preservation of Green River Wildlife Habitat. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Wildlife Fund SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL ACCEPT CHECK FOR DEPOSIT IN WILDLIFE FUND. CARRIED. Committee of Whole Council President Pro tem Perry presented Committee of the Whole report Report recommending that the matter of the Cedar River Master Plan be referred Cedar River to the Community Services Committee. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY Master Plan SCHELLERT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REPORT AND CEDAR RIVER MASTER PLAN BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Parking on The Committee of the Whole report recommended that the parking problem Burnett Ave. S. on Burnett Ave. be referred to the Public Safety Committee for review. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REPORT AND REFER MATTER OF PARKING PROBLEM ON BURNETT AVE TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR REPORT BACK. Following discussion, Motion CARRIED. Downtown Parking The Committee of the Whole report noted regarding the matter of parking for the downtown area, the Committee recommended that the Public Works Director be authorized to present the parking problem • to the downtown merchants and report back to the Council their response. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE OF WHOLE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Rainier Ave. The Committee of the Whole report recommended that the referral re changing the name of Rainier Ave. to Renton Ave. (S.Grady Way to City limits) be placed on the next Committee of the Whole agenda. MOVED BY GRANT, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. Logan Ave. Signal MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, THAT THE MATTER OF SIGNAL LIGHTS Lights ON LOGAN AVE. N. AT 6th, 7th AND 8th WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN PROPOSED STREET VACATION BY THE BOEING COMPANY,BE REFERRED TO THE TRANSPORTA- TION AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR DISCUSSION. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THE SUBJECT OF Marina CITY OPERATED MARINA ON LAKE WASHINGTON TO THE PARK BOARD. CARRIED. Council Position Council President Pro tem Perry reported Committee recommendation that Committee of the Whole interview candiates for Council position which will be vacated January 12, 1976 when Councilman Delaurenti assumes office of Mayor, that the meeting be held 12/18/75 and dead- line for applications to be filed with Council President be 12/15. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION Special Meeting OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE TO MEET WITH CANDIDATES. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL SET SPECIAL MEETING FOR COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AT 8:00 PM, DECEMBER 18, COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CARRIED. Fire Master Plan Councilman Schellert requested written progress report from Fire Chief Williams prior to 1/12/76 re Master Plan for Fire Protection. VOUCHER APPROVAL MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO. 7195 THROUGH NO. 7300 AIHICH HAVE RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION AS TO MERCHANDISE RECEIVED OR SERVICES RENDERED) IN THE AMOUNT OF $121 ,914.53, PLUS LID #291 REVENUE FUND WARRAND #R-7 IN AMOUNT OF $2,127.60 PLUS CASH FUND WARRANT NO. C-9 IN AMOUNT OF $2;127.60. MOTION CARRIED. Vouchers No. 7188 through 7194 were machine voided during processing. ORDINANCES Legislation Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report • Ordinance No. 2987 recommending second and final readingsfor an ordinance rezoning Rezone G to B-1 the Gary Moritz property from G to B-1 (First reading 12/1/75) . Moritz Property Following second reading of the ordinance rezoning property located on Union Ave. N.E. next to Mobil Station, it was MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: Six Ayes : DELAURENTI, PERRY, CLYMER, BRUCE, GRANT. AND SCHELLERT; One No: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance No. 2988 The Legislation Committee report presented an ordinance for second Inner .Harbor Line and final readings, annexing to the City properties located north Annexation of the Municipal Airport created by the relocation of the Inner Renton City Council Page 3 12/8/75 ` " ' " CORRESPONDENCE - Continued • William G. Moran Councilman Perry left the Council, Chambers and took no part in 'any Rezone . : discussion nor in any action regarding this matter. Upon inquiry Continued by Councilman Stredicke, Planning' Director Ericksen noted rezone would allow' applicant to convert existing home to duplex and is across the street from R-3 zoning; that if used for any other purpose • must. go before the Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. ' Isle & Lake Addn. Letter from Planning Director Ericksen further reported Planning Corn- Pickle Final Plat mission recommendation for Council approval of Final Plat of Lyle L. #FP-846-75. Pickle for Isle and Lake Addition, a residential subdivision located on the north side of .N. 38th St. between Lake Washington Blvd:' N'.' and Park Ave. N. The letter, noted existing use as one single 'family residence' with proposed use 'of nine lot single family residential- ' subdivi.sion,, being in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan and noted conformance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance for the two acres. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND REFER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR PROPER ORDINANCE. CARRIED. • ' • Renton Management Letter from the Renton Management Association donated $100 for flood Association relief to help alleviate suffering and hardship of community members; Donation donation being forwarded to the Maple Valley Flood Relief Fund. Street Vacation Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason reported cost analysis N.W. 5th between ' used in determining fair value for that portion of N.W. 5th Street -Lind & Stevens N.W. between Lind' Ave. 'N.W. and Stevens Ave. N.W. , proposed street vacation requested by Gary Vigoren. The total 12,000 sq. ft. is listed at $5,800 with half testimated value .$2,900, the cost for each of the four abutting property owners is calculated at $725. MOVED BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER TO THE LEGISLA- TIONCOMMITTEE. CARRIED. ' Flood Damage Letter from Public Works :Director. Gonnason submitted preliminary Cedar River damaged caused by recent Cedar River flooding which is being coordi- ' Wed. with State and Federal agencies to effect Disaster Fund applica tions. .Bank erosion between Logan Ave. bridge and mouth of Cedar River $50,000; bank erosion upstream from Logan .Bridge $10,000; Park Depart- ment landscaping $10,000; wash-out upstread from half-bridge $30,000 to' $40,000; gravel deposits at mouth of Cedar $300,000 to $400,000; ' May. Creek $50,000, total estimate from $450,000 to $560,000 food ' damage. The letter reported preliminary investigations indicate no structural damage to any of the City's major bridges and structures including the Library and City Hall ; also reporting diversion works around Springbrook Watershed operated successfully. The letter noted the Department' was hopeful that a substantial portion of repairs may be accomplished by Disaster Relief Funds. RECESS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY, GRANT, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. . Council recessed' at' 9:10 p.m. and reconvened at 9:30 p.m. All Council- ' men were present at Roll Call . ' OLD BUSINESS Community Services Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee ' report regarding Appeal by Scarcella Brothers of Planning Commission Community Services'' decision of partial fill permit, reporting study made of issue Committee Report involved and the Soil Conservation Service recommendations. The ' committee report recommended that the Council concur in- the request Scarcell'a Bros.Inc.,, of the 'applicant and allow the landfill and that the applicant work Appeal of Planning with the Planning Department on' the landscaping requirements. MOVED ' Commission Decision BY SCHELLERT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL' CON'CUR IN RECOMMENDATION Re Landfill ' OF THE 'COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE.* Discussion ensued wherein Coun- cilman Grant noted Soil Conservation representative Bill Cokely's comments that S. C.S. would not object 'to specific alternate wetland areas. _Alan Austin, 1515 Norton Blgd. , Seattle, representing Scar- . ' sella Brothers,' Inc. questioned 'landscapinq required and noted favor able attitude toward voluntary contribution to' preservation and main- • ' tenance of wildlife habitat in lieu of landscaping if a savings was. realized. ' Councilman' Stredicke noted existence of fund for wildlife' ' preservation and also noted reduction which could be made in landscap- ring with resultant savings to be contributed' to the preservation of wildlife habitats. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL AMEND MOTION TO CONCUR IN' RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE BY DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL DOES FIND IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT BUT SINCE, DEVELOPER HAS PRESENTED LANDSCAPING PLAN, TO THE CITY THIS IS. MITIGATION FOR LOSS OF WILDLIFE HABITAT.** Grant""further explained this, would. • 'meet SEPA requirements: Council would overturn Planning Commission ,- . CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 17th day of November , 19 75 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, Renton , Washington as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following : Appeal of Planning Commission decision of 9/24/75, granting partial approval of filling a grading permit, SP-760-74. (Located on West Valley Highway approximately 1200 feet North of S.W. 43rd Street) Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same . CITY OF RENTON ..,) q. Delores A. Mead , Ci y Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION October 10, 1975 1 w, - 1 � 4 S9r • Affidavit of Publication - - . STATE OF WASHINGTON ' COUNTY OF KING ss. t arha.rs. Camoaf~rta being first duly sworn on y she chief clerk oath,deposes and says that is the of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, and it is now and during all of staid time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the — - Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, i �1. — Hearing West Va1.1cy - _ i Washington.That the annexed is a CI?U I RENTON 11 IIa.wa 71 NOTICE PUBLIC HEARIN I BY >-._ RENTON CITY COUNCIL' as it was ublishedinre regular NOTICE'ISM'HEREBY GIVEN' P g that the'Renton City Council� 'as not'in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period fixed-the,1Jthda {'"' a' 1975; at:8:00JP �y of Novemberl M..,in the Cou cilr Chambers,of the Renton Municipal • • of 021C consecutive issues commencingon the Building,Renton„INas�hingaslhe time and place foa+publ c:::,Fing to' consider the following , 10 s - of 4'ct. 75 Appeal of Plarirnng Cosion'k day ,19 ,and ending the decision oft9/24/75 ting partial approval,of�fillmg>fgrad • ing permit,SP-7.60 74 day of ,19 ,both dates i "" " inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub (Located on WeValley,High scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee way approximately120.feetia North of S 1N 43rd3Sree) charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $'8 ,�, which areAnvitedtoflbe present toersons+1 has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the approval,disapproval or opinions on it same. '. r• .„,4,, first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for e h subsequent ..xC_r r 1,4 insertion. CITY°C RENTON; ' - Delores atMead, t°`.City Clerks... ublished�intheRenton'Reco'd Chronicle Octobe 10��1975.R3497 chief c1.©L 10 Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of () t. 75 • , 19 / U Notary Pub 'c i rand for the State o Washington, residing at t, in County. —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. - —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 1 , 7 ,L OF0 R� THE CITY OF RENTON - o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 "' AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD ?,o ��0 CITY CLERK fD SEP1E'' October 10, 1975 Scarsella Brothers, Inc. - P. 0. Box 6205 Seattle, Wa 98188 Attn: Mr. Antonio Scarsella President Dear Sir: Your letter appealing Planning Commission decision, granting only partial filling and grading request, was presented to the Renton City Council at itsiregular meeting of October 6, 1975. The date of November 17, 1975 has been set for hearing of your appeal, and you or a representative of your firm are invited to be present. For further details please refer to the attached Notice of Public Hearing. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead City Clerk DAM/ib Enclosure I ' CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 17th day o f November , 19 75 , at 8 : 00 P .M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building , Renton , Washington as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following : Appeal of Planning Commission decision of 9/24/75, granting partial approval of filling a grading permit, SP-760-74. (Located on West Valley Highway approximately 1200 feet North of S.W. 43rd Street) Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same . CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead , Clerk • DATE OF PUBLICATION October 10, 1975 "AzSte- 960- 7171 �r� 6784. October 7, 1975 �� „ /J.. ,p State of l VC> `� c. Mshington 4 4975 Deparhlment Ce,' , J,.:.� of Ecology 0p _ 4 p The City of Renton �Or, "1^" • ` `'„'r Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South `������ � Renton, Washington 98055 Gentlemen: SUBJECT: KING COUNTY APPLICANT: SCARSELLA BROTHERS INC. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT #N925-17-A (SM 28-74) (OFFICE BUILDING AND REPAIR SHOP) • The 45-day review period by the Department of Ecology and Attorney General 's Office for the above Shoreline Management Permit will terminate on October 10, 1975. If no notice of appeal is received by the above date, construction pursuant to the permit may then commence provided, however, all other local , state, and federal laws regulating such construction have been complied with. 0 Sincerely, ROB RT K. M cCORM I CK Regional Manager Northwest Regional Office RKM: 11 cc: Scarse" la Bros, Inc. P.O. Box 6205 . Seattle, Washington 98104 4 OF Ag771/6/%\ -0 °cr 8 /975 slt DEPA% Northwest Regional Office, 4350 150th Avenue N.E., Redmond. Washingoln 98052 �_ _ Talenhone: (2061 885-1900 ENTp (..34" 4N • 0"5/ ow" /fri ,f 8 29303 _ey% 'NNING b Iff\-u) 10:M t� The Honorable Mayor and City Council «1�12��� City of Renton , Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Scar ellaBrothers, Inc. Appeal..from Planning Commission Action of September 24, 1975 Dear Mayor and Councilpersons: ScarsellalBrothers, Inc. hereby appeals the decision of the Planning Commission of the City of Renton taken at their meeting of September 24, 1975, on the application of Scarsella Brothers., Inc. for approval of a filling and grading permit and site plan approval per the application on file and the final Environmental Impact Statement on file. The action of the Planning Commission was to grant a partial permit for a westerly portion of the property and the undersigned appeals from that action and the denial of the remainder of such application for the easterly portion of the property. The undersigned requests a public hearing before the City Council on this appeal at the earliest possible date. Very truly yours, SCARSELLA BROTHERS, INC. . • By Antonio Scarsella, President klh cc Renton Planning Commission Attention; Mike Smith Renton Planning, Commission Meeting September 24 , 1975 Page Two entire sitewith approximately 78 ,000 cubic yards of fill material , aind development plans included construction of an office building , construction repair shop and outside storage' areja at the east end of the site . A Final Environ- mental. Impact Statement has been prepared , and comments from interested parties have been reviewed by the Planning Com- mission , Special Studies Committee , and staff. Mr. Smith stated that: a Shoreline Management Permit has been granted allowing filling , grading , and development of the. westerly 300 feet of the. site or to the top of the existing pond bank , whichever is less . Slides of the property were viewed , with special. emphasis on, the pondii,ng area , which were taken at all seasons of the year. The topography of the property was described and significant: landmarks were identified . Mr. Smith _,reviewed the progress of the application, noting that it had been received on March 6 , 1974 , along with an applica- tion for rezone from G to M-P . The request for rezone to M-P had been granted . in June 1974. 5 The Chairman called for comment from the applicant. Alan Austin: of Montgomery , Purdue , Blankenship and Austin , a lawyer representing Scarsella Brothers , noted the pre- sence of th'e applicant in the audience and referred the Commission to the Final Environmental Impact Statement that had been prepared to address the issues involved and offered to respond to any questions from the Commission . He stated that the basic problem concerns the request by the Soil Conservation Service that 110 acres of wetlands be maintained or mitigated in the Green River Valley by the four municipalities of Renton , Kent , Auburn , Tukwila , and King County; and he displayed a map published by that agency indicating their recommendations regarding those areas , including the Scarsella pond . He cited the City of Renton ' s; resolution of July 22 , 1974 , supporting the program but! indicating that no City funds were to be expended for the purpose without prior approval of the City. He referred to the recommendation by the Soil Con- servation Service that not less than two percent of land be preserved for wildlife and noted that in this situation nearly sixty percent of the property was being designated for this purpose . Mr. Austin noted that they have complied with all City and State requirements and indicated it is their desire to comply with the City ' s Mining , Excavation -and Grading Ordinance . Mr. Austin noted the issuance of a partial Shoreline Management Permit and indicated that it was their feeling that the Soil Conservation Service , U. S . Fish and Wildlife Service , and Washington Department of Game were telling them to continue to wait until someone • else makes the decision regarding which wetlands to actually include in the 110 acres . It is their opinion that inasmuch as the property was rezoned to M-P and is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan , intensive development should be permitted . , Mr. Austin said that $37 ,000 in sewer and water assessments: had been levied against the property by the City . He stated there would be no decision required if the City is going to acquire the property but indicated that it is their belief that there has been no decision with regard to the sharing of the 110 acres to be preserved by the • affected communities or the funding of those lands . He requested a- decision as to whether the City wants to buy the property , condemn it , or grant the filling and - grading permit. cSC�Ca�S el/a OkGG RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION cb 0C 116%0- T PUBLIC HEARING MEETING cp ,9 v SEPTEMBER 24, 1975 '•o c/Ty ��0 fr MINUTES le�e6�gc Z�z,;L�� COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Logan Garrison , Larry Gibson , Ant-hone Mola , Norman Ross , Arthur Scholes , Clark Teegarden , Joan Walker , Bylund Wik . COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Elisabeth Rivily . CITY STAFF PRESENT: James L . Magstadt , Asst . Planning Director ; Michael Smith , Asst . Planner ; Willis Roberts , Recording Secretary. The September 1975 public hearing meeting of the Renton Planning Commission was called to order at 8 : 05 p . m . by Chair- man Scholes . Approximately seventy-five people were noted as - being present in the audience . The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Wik . 1 - ROLL CALL was taken by Commissioner Mola , acting in the absence of Secretary Rivily . All members responded present with the exception of Commissioner Rivily ( illness ) . • ACTION: MOVED BY MOLA, SECONDED BY WIK, TO EXCUSE THE ABSENT COMMISSIONER . MOTION CARRIED. • 2- APPROVAL OF MINUTES : Corrections or additions to the minutes of the Septem- ber 10 , 1975 , meeting were invited by the Chairman . Chairman Scholes indicated that he wished to make cor- rections and additions as follows : On page 2 , line 6 , of the second paragraph , the word "not" be interjected between the words " to" and "subdivide" ; on page 3 the word "matter" in the next to the last line of the third paragraph be changed to read " latest proposal " ; and the typographical error in the word " remained" in the last paragraph on the page be corrected . ACTION: MOVED BY MOLA, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1975 , BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED AND AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED. 3 - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS : SPECIAL PERMIT: A, SCARSELLA BROS . , INC . ; Appl . No . SP-760-74 ; special permit to allow filling and grading in M-P zone ; property located approximately 1200 ' north of S . W . 43rd on W . Valley Highway . Acting Secretary. Mola introduced the item to the Commis- sion at the request of the Chairman , and a briefing from the staff was invited . Assistant Planner Smith pointed out the location of the 5 . 8 acre site situated between the West Valley Highway and the Burlington-Northern railroad tracks just north of S . W. 43rd St . He noted that approximately two acres of the property contains a ponding area suitable for wildlife habitat . He stated that the applicant has requested permission to fill the • ` L Renton Planning, Comm i ssi on Meeting September 24 , 1975 Page Four In response: to Commissioner Ross ' inquiry regarding offers for !acquisition of his land , Mr. Scarsella stated ::that he had; received none from any private parties or governmental agencies. Commissioneir Mola stated that it was his feeling that the utilities assessment should not be levied to include the ponding area , that an adjustment should be made , and that Mr. Scarsella was being penalized in being asked to main- ' tain more than two percent 'of his property for game and wildlife . He indicated a need for a commitment from the city, federal and state agencies involved regarding the acquisition of these areas . He described the pond as .a mosquito infested area that would benefit from filling in his opinion . . - In reply to: questioning from the Chairman , Mr. Scarsella indicated that the assessment had been based. upon square footage of the entire site . Discussion followed with regard to the economic issues involved in ! relation to the land use concerns , with Commissioners. Wik , Scholes and Teegarden noting that as a land use decision making body , the recommendations of the Soil ' Conse.rvation Service , State Departments of Game and Fisheries , and King County• which indicated the area as ; ecologically valuable necessitated their consideration . All agreed that an adjustment in the assessment should be reviewed and noted the difficulty in making the decision . Commissioner Teegarden referred to the current study by the Planning Department to deter- mine the effects of the drainage channels on the wetlands and..indicated that until that determination had been made , the Commission should not allow filling , as it would be an irrevocable action . Commissioner Walker queried regarding the 'expected completion date of the special , study and was advised by Assistant Planning Director Magstadt that the evaluation should be concludedby December 31 ;. 1975 . Mr. Magstadt then briefly described , the program which will include certain mitigation mea- sures to compensate for elimination of wetlands in particular areas , recently specially funded by the State Department of Community Development . Methods of acquisi - . tion of the properties will not be a part of the study. The Assistant Planning Director advised that the Council Community Services Committee is presently studying the Planning Commission ' s recommendation for revision of the • Comprehensive Plan in the Green River Valley and that hopefully an answer to the matter of compensation will be provided . He noted that some conservation groups have indicated they may have money to loan or donate, but acquisition has not been finalized at this time . Further discussion ensued , with Commissioner Ross noting that the pond was in existence at the time of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan , which has indicated for years it is suitable for intensive use ; and , therefore , he expressed his objection to its commitment as natural habitat . Commissioner Teegarden responded that the ' present Comprehensive Plan designates this property for industrial use ; however, the Commission has recommended ' to the Council that it be changed for this area and indicates the Scarsella ponding area as greenbelt . Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 24, 1975 Page Three The applicant ' s representative described the formation of the pond , claiming it was the result of drainage from fill to the north and embankments of the railroad tracks to the east and had no interaction with the Green River. He noted the pre- sence of the West Valley Highway between the pond and the River. He stated that Mr. Scarsella ' s lease at the present location of his business has expired and is currently on a month to month basis . He also noted that the business has 60 , 000 cubic yards of fill material stored in another area on a limited time -basis . He again offered to reply to questions from the Commission . The Chairman invited further input from the staff, but none was offered . He called for comment from the audience , but there was no response . The report from the Special Studies Committee was then requested . Commissioner Gibson , Chairman , stated that the Committee had discussed the comments received in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement , especially the reply submitted by the Soil Conservation Service regarding the pond ' s rela- tionship to the proposed wildlife mitigation areas and the Agency ' s drainage channel project in which it was requested that approval be obtained from the U . S . Fish and Wildlife Service and the Washington Department of Game , should there be a variance from their recommendation. They re- viewed the proposed grading plan , site plan and Shoreline; ' Permit and felt that it was possible to allow much of the , project through a partial permit and yet satisfy the agencies opposing the filling of the pond until other suitable miti - gation areas are established . The Committee also noted that a study of the effects of the P- 1 Channel system on the wetland areas in the Valley is presently in progress . Under the circumstances , Mr. Gibson stated that it was their recom- mendation that approval be granted of a special permit to fill and grade the westerly 300 feet or to the top bank of the pond , whichever is less , until such time as a final determination of suitable wildlife habitat areas is made in accordance with Soil Conservation Service requirements for the P- 1 Channel drainage project . Mr . Gibson stated the recommended conditions of approval are as follows : 1 . The establishment of earth berms a minimum five feet in height along the north , south , and west side of the property for construction equipment storage area screening subject to final approval of the Planning Department. 2 . Storm water and sedimentation control methods as approved by the Public Works Department . 3 . Utilization of suitable erosion control methods approved by the Planning Department . 4 . Final landscaping plan subject to Planning Depart- ment approval . 5 . Suitable measures shall be used to control dust and sand during the fill operation . The Chairman again invited comment from the audience , but none was offered . Discussion was then opened to the Commis- sion . Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 24, 1975 Page Six ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY WIK, THAT THE PLANNING COMMIS- SION CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL STUDIES COM- MITTEE DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 1975, WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT THE APPLICANT BE GIVEN THE OPTION OF SOME OTHER FORM OF SCREENING ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST SIDES OF THE PROPERTY FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT STORAGE IN LIEU OF A BERM SUCH AS AN OPAQUE SCREEN TO BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Discussion ensued with Commissioner Mola inquiring regarding appeal procedures , should the motion be passed , and the possibility of acquisition of the property by federal and state agencies . Commissioner Wik , noting that the Compre- hensive Plan proposal for the Green River Valley is presently being studied by the City Council ' s Community Services Com- mittee , expressed the opinion that the City should be given the opportunity to act regarding the property . With regard to the length of study involving the application , it was noted that the Final Environmental Impact Statement was dated July 18 , 1975 , which was received too late for the July public hearing and that the Planning Commission does not conduct hearings during August. Commissioner Gibson , Chairman of the Special Studies Committee , indicated that the group had studied the EIS thoroughly during the month of August , and he believed they had acted in an expeditious manner. On the question , a roll call vote was requested with the following results : GARRISON - AYE GIBSON - AYE MOLA - NO ROSS - NO TEEGARDEN - AYE WIK - AYE WALKER - AYE MOTION CARRIED. Mr . Austin expressed his apology for the impression he made that any member of the Planning Commission was doing anything dishonest and indicated that it was his feeling that a fact- finding board should wait to hear everything before making a decision . A recess was declared by the Chairman at 9 : 30 p . m. The meeting was resumed at 9 : 45 p . m. with all members noted above in attendance . REZONE: B. GARY MORITZ ; Appl . No . R-821-75 ; Rezone from G to B- 1 ; - property located on the E . side of Union Ave . N . E . approx. 400 ' south of N . E . 4th St . Acting Secretary Mola introduced the rezone application . A staff presentation was invited by the Chairman . Noting that the review of the application had been continued from the July public hearing at the request of Mr. Moritz , Assistant Planner Smith pointed out the G zoned . 67 acre site located on the east side of Union Ave . N . E . just south of N . E . 4th St . Mr. Smith then reviewed a blow-up map which indicated both Comprehensive .Plan and zoning designations in the vicinity . He indicated that the Comprehensive Plan shows business zoning to approximately 400 feet south of N . E . . 4th St. and touches about 20 feet on the northwest end of the property. Renton Planning Commrsion Meeting September 24, 1975 Page Five The Chairman recognized Mr. Austin , who displayed a picture of the Soil Conservation Service ' s plan which identifies areas of wetlands in the Valley and stated that there are other areas in it that are adequate for preservation . He asked for a decision on the basis of the law that was in effect at the time of the application . He stated the alternative is for the affected communities on the basis of population and area to come up with a plan for definite designation of wetlands and their acquisition . He stated that they are proposing to fill the pond and do not need to fill the area being approved . He also asked that Commissioner Teegarden disqualify himself from voting based upon his earlier state- ment that in the proposed revised Comprehensive Plan the ponding area has been designated as greenbelt . Chairman Scholes responded , for the record , that he did not believe that any Planning Commission member has 'prejudged the decision . Following a brief discussion among the Commissioners relative to the basis for a decision , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY MOLA , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. MOTION CARRIED. IT WAS THEN ACTION: MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY MOLA , THAT THE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILLING AND GRADING BY SCARSELLA BROTHERS, INC. BE GRANTED FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AND THAT THE APPLICANT BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL STORM WATER RUNOFF THROUGH UTILIZATION OF APPROVED EROSION CONTROL METHODS; THAT HE BE REQUIRED TO PROPERLY SCREEN THE STORAGE YARD AREA OF HIS CONSTRUCTION SITE SO THAT IT WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS AND THAT A FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR APPROVAL. Discussion followed , especially with regard to the lengthy study of land use in the Green River Valley in connection with the updating of the Comprehensive Plan , for which an EIS was prepared . Chairman Scholes stated that it was his opinion that every Commissioner has considered land use in the subject area for a long period of time , has studied the material involved , visited the site , and has personal viewpoints toward environmental issues . However , the Chair- main said he did not believe there was anyone on the Com- mission who could prejudge the outcome of the vote . Com- missioner Ross indicated his confidence in Commissioner Teegarden to make a decision that would be proper and unbi - ased . On the question , a roll call vote was requested with the following results : GARRISON - AYE GIBSON - NO MOLA - AYE ROSS - AYE TEEGARDEN - NO WIK - NO WALKER - AYE MOTION FAILED. Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 24 , 1975 Page Eight between Union Ave . N . E . and Monroe Ave . N . E . was pre- sently developed. In reply to Commissioner Garrison , the . Assistant Planning Director and Commissioner Tee- garden indicated that they were unaware of the sales document mentioned by Mr . Kleweno and that the prop- erty immediately north of the site under discussion was rezoned approximately three years ago as a part of a total parcel . It was the Commission ' s decision at that time that the southern part of the site should be retained as R-3 as a transition from B- 1 use to single family development to the south . There was further discussion regarding the merits of "squaring off" of the area for commercial use and the application of the Comprehensive Plan to the situ- ation . Further comments were invited from the audi - ence by the Chairman but none were received . IT WAS THEN MOVED BY ROSS , SECONDED BY WALKER, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED UNANI - MOUSLY . Discussion among the Commissioners ensued with respect to the intersection not being symetrically zoned for commercial use and that the Comprehensive Plan , while being a flexible guide , designates the site for medium density , multiple family development . It was noted by Commissioner Ross that no objections had been expressed by the audience or in written form. It was also observed by Commissioner Mola that rezoning the site as requested would result in " spot zoning . " Commissioner . Gibson indicated his feeling that the area was appropriate for the B- 1 designation , and IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY GIBSON, SECONDED BY ROSS, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION GRANT THE GARY MORITZ REZONE REQUEST FROM G TO B-1 . Commissioner Teegarden reminded the group of the existing R-3 zoned property which lies between the B- 1 zoned area at the intersection and the subject site and indicated that it was his opinion that to grant the request would be an illegal act . On the question , a roll call vote was requested with the following results : GARRISON - AYE GIBSON - AYE MOLA - NO ROSS - AYE TEEGARDEN - NO WIK - NO WALKER - NO MOTION FAILED. Following• a brief discussion , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY WIK, THAT THE GARY MORITZ APPLICATION FOR REZONING OF HIS PROPERTY FROM G TO B-1 BE DENIED. Renton Planning Coma,..-�si on Meeting September 24 , 1975 Page Seven Surrounding zoning was noted as R-3 , medium density , multi - family to the north ; G, single family residential to the east; and B- 1 , .commercial , to the west across the street. Mr. Smith stated that B- 1 zoning extends towards the north on Union Ave . N . E . beyond the intersection with N . E . 4th St. King County has been contacted relative to the appli - cation of their Comprehensive Plan in the vicinity and noted it designates potential business zoning near the _ corner of N. E . 4th St . and 138th Ave . N . E . Areas near the subject property are presently zoned S-R (single family residential ) . The general character of the neighborhood was also described . Comment was invited from the applicant. Melvin Kleweno , 213 S . 4th , Kent , attorney representing Mr. Moritz , noted that the City ' s Comprehensive Plan indicates the four corners at the intersection of N . E . 4th St . and Union Ave . N . E . for commercial use . He discussed the philosophy of cluster zoning versus strip zoning and indicated that it was his understanding that the Planning Department subscribed to the theory and that the area had been so designated on the Comprehensive Plan approximately seven or eight years ago . He stated he felt the Commission should consider the history and zoning of adjacent properties when considering the appli - cation and requested that particular attention be given to the fact that the only quadrant of the intersection that doesn ' t have business zoning is approximately 400 feet south of N . E . 4th St . on Union Avenue N . E. and approximately 300 feet deep , which contains the Moritz property . He stated that the applicant has furnished him with information that seems to indicate that the major rezoning on the other three quadrants of the sub- ject intersection probably occurred since the Comprehen- sive Plan was drawn in . He then requested that considera- tion be given to granting the B- 1 designation to keep the southeast quadrant in conformance with the other three . He indicated that minutes from prior hearings relative to this matter noted that there has been no objection from the neighborhood or out of the neighbor- hood to the request . He referred to the application of Dennis R. Oster regarding the rezoning of his property to the south from G to R-3 and stated that granting of this request would provide a buffer between commercial and single family use . In reference to the •68 foot R-3 zoned strip of property immediately north of the subject site , Mr. Kleweno stated that it was their understanding that when the service station was granted this zoning , it was put in as a " holding buffer zone . " In this regard he referred the Commission to a copy of a contract of sale for this property in which it was stated that there was a promise from the purchaser who put in the service station that the seller agrees to rezone of the strip to B- 1 . The attorney said that a copy of the sales agreement , which is dated July 24 , 1970 , would be provided . He noted further that water and sewer facilities are available to serve the property and urged favorable consideration of the application . The Chairman invited further input from the staff but none was offered. Discussion of the request was then opened to the Commission . Concerns expressed involved the need for B- 1 zoning in the area with Commissioner Gibson estimating that approximately seventy-five percent of the property zoned for business use . Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 24 , 1975 Page Ten REZONE: C. DENNIS R. OSTER ; Appl . No . R-827-75 ; Rezon'e from G to R-3 ; property located on the east side of Union Ave . N . E . approx . 500 ' south of N . E . 4th St . The rezone application was introduced by Acting Secretary Mola and a staff presentation was invited by the Chairman . Assistant Planner Smith noted the approximate . 7 acre G zoned site just south of the Moritz site on the map and advised that the Comprehensive Plan indicates the area as medium density. Existing zoning in the vicinity was not reviewed in view of the proximity of the property to the Moritz site . Comments were invited from the applicant by the Chairman . Dennis R. Oster, 316 Union Ave . N . E . , Renton , applicant , stated that he is the owner of the property and currently occupies it as a single family dwelling . Mr. Oster indi - cated that he could speak for the community and that they were in favor of the program put together by Mr. Moritz and himself. It is his feeling that the people want commercial development on his site and he indicated it was his opinion that the east side of Union Ave . N . E . south of N . E . 4th should all be B- 1 , inasmuch as there are very few residents on the street . He noted that the City has established a gravel storage area down the street from his site and pointed out the location of the Prairie Market across the street . He requested approval of his R-3 zoning request . Mr. Magstadt reported that the gravel storage yard des- cribed is located in an area presently owned by the City of Renton and was acquired for the purpose of construction of a water facility for that particular area . The prop- erty has not been developed at this time and is presently being used for storage of gravel by the Public Works Department. Chairman Scholes invited comment from the audience but received no response . He then called for questions or discussion from the Commission . Responding to Commissioner Wik ' s inquiry regarding the plans between the applicant and Mr. Moritz , Mr. Oster indicated that they wished to construct an office build- ing or parking area , which are needed by businesses in the area ; and the neighbors preferred that type of develop- ment to apartments or duplexes . There was a brief discussion relative to the limits of R-3 zoning , and IT WAS MOVED BY GIBSON , SECONDED BY GARRISON , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY . ACTION: MOVED BY GIBSON, SECONDED BY WALKER , THAT THE DENNIS R . OSTER APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R-3 BE GRANTED AS IT IS IN AGREEMENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Discussion followed , and Commissioner Teegarden stated that it was his opinion that, as in the Moritz ' applica- tion , it would be preferable that the property be designated ' Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 24 , 1975 Page Nine On the question , a roll call vote was requested with the follow- ing results : GARRISON - AYE GIBSON - NO MOLA - NO ROSS - NO TEEGARDEN - AYE WIK - AYE WALKER - AYE MOTION CARRIED. A brief discussion followed regarding the possibility that the action to deny may be appealed , and IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE PLANNING COMMIS- SION RECOMMEND THAT THE HIGHEST LAND USE FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BE NO GREATER THAN R-3 AS IT IS IN AGREEMENT WITH THE COMPREHEN- SIVE PLAN. The Assistant Planning Director advised that should the appli - cant be agreeable at this time , the Planning Commission could ' make a recommendation for an alternative zone which would be of less intensity than that requested . Commissioner Teegarden stated that in the past when an application has been denied and followed by an appeal to the Council , the Council has not really known the Commission ' s thinking on the subject . ACTION: MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY GIBSON, THAT WE TABLE THE MOTION TO ALLOW FOR WORD FROM THE APPLICANT. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Kleweno , applicant ' s attorney , stated that Mr. Moritz did not want the R-3 classification and requested that the record indicate that he was opposed to the recommendation going to the Council . Following a brief discussion , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA , THAT HIS MOTION BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE FOR A VOTE. MOTION CARRIED, ROSS AND GIBSON DISSENTING. A roll call vote was requested on the motion relative to the recommendation to the Council , with the following results : GARRISON - NO GIBSON - NO MOLA - AYE ROSS - NO TEEGARDEN - AYE WIK - AYE WALKER - AYE MOTION CARRIED. Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 24 , 1975 Page Twelve The application for preliminary plat approval and exception to the Subdivision Ordinance was introduced by Acting Sec- retary- ,Mol a , „and a staff report requested .. Assistant Planner Smith described the preliminary plat proposed for the approximate three acre , G-7200 zoned site , located in the Kennydale area adjacent to the King County May Creek Park . He noted that proposed access is via an unimproved 25 foot right-of-way known as N . E . 28th , which extends west from Aberdeen Ave . N . E . to Kennewick P1 . N. E . along the south boundary of the site . Mr. Smith displayed a blow-up map of the area and described exist- ing rights-of-way in the vicinity . The proposal is for a ten lot subdivision with lot sizes ranging in size from 8900 square feet to 13, 000 square feet to be developed in a cul -de-sac configuration and serviced by a 50 foot right-of-way in accordance with City standards . Mr. Smith indicated that some pipestem lots were planned on the southwest corner of the property . It is proposed to provide sewers and water from Kenne- wick P1 . N . E . It was noted that the south half of the property is designated as single family residential ,. and the north half . as greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan . Mr. Smith read the letter from the applicant requesting exception to the Subdivision Ordinance and noted recom- mendations made by the Traffic Engineer and Fire Depart- ment with regard to access , which indicates that Traffic Engineering .has determined that the 25 foot right-of-way is insufficient for the proposed ten-lot subdivision and has recommended a minimum paved 22 foot roadway with adequate pedestrian buffer areas on each side and that the Fire Department noted that 25 feet is inadequate for their equipment and recommended a minimum 40 foot right-of-way and a hydrant at the end of the cul -de-sac . Mr. Smith advised that the Commission may recommend approval of the exception to the City Council , if it is their opinion an undue hardship may be created. The Commission was informed that the Utilities Engineering Division of the Public Works Department indicated no objections with regard to sanitary sewers . Slides and aerial photographs of the area were viewed and described by the Assistant Planner, who noted natural characteristics of the site and essentially single family land use in the vicinity . Responding to Commissioner Gibson , Mr. Smith stated that the creek in the vicinity of N . E . 28th does not meet the flow requirements of the Shoreline Management Act and , therefore , those requirements do not apply . Further questions were invited by the staff, but none were received . The Chairman then invited comment from the applicant. Eben L . Munson , one of the owners of the property purchased in 1966 , noted that their engineer was unable to be present. He described problems encountered with regard to obtaining access and stated that at one time they had availability to other access but that due to a series of circumstances it had been cut off, and it was necessary to use N . E . 28th or to relocate the cul -de-sac and come out on Aberdeen . The County , railroad , and former owner or Lot 51 were involved in these transactions. It was pointed out by the Assistant Planner that when the area was annexed into Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 24, 1975 Page Eleven as R-2 with apartment and professional office development allowed by special permit , as it would create a smoother transition to the single family residential area . Commis- sioner Mola concurred with this opinion . Commissioners Ross and Garrison spoke in support of the request , indicating that it is their belief that the area will ultimately be developed more intensively.. On the question , a roll call vote was requested with the following results : GARRISON - AYE GIBSON - AYE MOLA NO ROSS - AYE TEEGARDEN - NO WIK - AYE WALKER - AYE MOTION CARRIED. 4• NEW PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: FINAL PLAT: A, KENNYDALE PARK ADDITION ; Appl . FP-8.36-75 ; application for final plat approval ; property located on N . E . 27th St . between Aberdeen Ave . N . E . and Edmonds Ave . .N . E . The request for approval of a final plat in the Kennydale area was introduced by. the Acting Secretary , and a staff report was invited by Chairman Scholes . The Assistant Planner described the 1 . 14 acre plat presently zoned G-7200 . Subdivision of the property into five lots ranging from approximately 7500 square feet -Co approximately 8200 square feet is in progress . Mr. Smith noted that the preliminary plat had been approved in February 1975 and the ' requested adjustments to comply with City standards had been made . The Chairman invited comment from the applicant , but none were offered . Discussion from the Commission followed . In reply to Commissioner Ross , Mr. Smith indicated that requested off-site improvements by the Planning Commission • had been consummated . IT WAS THEN MOVED BY GIBSON , SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING. BE CLOSED. MOTION CARRIED. ACTION: MOVED BY GIBSON, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE PLANNING COMMIS- SION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT OF THE KENNYDALE PARK ADDITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS IT COMPLIES WITH THE CITY 'S SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. A recess was declared by the Chairman at 11 : 00 p . m. The meeting was resumed at 11 : 12 p . m. with all Commissioners noted above present . PRELIMINARY PLAT - EXCEPTION B. KENNYDALE FIRS ; Appl . PP-838-75 and E-839-75 ; applications for preliminary plat approval and exception to Subdivision Ordinance ; property located on N . E . 28th St. between Jones Ave . N . E . and Aberdeen Ave . N . E . Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 24, 1975 Page Fourteen I� . ACTION: " ,MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO 'THE SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT , BACK AT THE OCTOBER 22ND PUBLIC HEARING. Mr. Spencer inquired if there were another method of expressing opposition should some of the residents not be• able to attend the October meeting and was advised by the Chairman that a petition would receive considera- tion by the Commission and Council . On the question , MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. It was suggested by the Assistant Planning Director that the residents select a spokesman , which would assist in the study and communication regarding the matter. Commissioner Gibson , Chairman of the Special Studies Committee , announced a meeting for 7 : 30 p . m. , October 15th , in the third floor conference room regarding the subject. 5• ADMINISTRATIVE: A. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 . . SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE Chairman Gibson stated that he would defer his report until the next meeting . 2 . ZONING COMMITTEE Commissioner Mola , Chairman , advised that the Committee had met with, the Co-chairmen of C . A. U . S . E . regarding their recommendation for a moratorium on multi -family rezones in the northeast portion of the City and other recommendations relative to the Zoning Ordinance . It was the consensus of all present that this would be difficult to accomplish and should not be attempted and that all of their recommendations would be studied and reviewed during the current detailed study and revision of the Comprehensive Plan relative to that area . It was noted that the Zoning Ordi - nance is also in the process of revision and that the concerns expressed by C . A. U . S . E . would be taken into consideration during these studies . Mr. Mola noted that a memorandum had been prepared to the City Council in response to their referral . ACTION: MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY GARRISON, THAT THE RESULTS OF THE ZONING COMMITTEE'S STUDY BE FOR- WARDED TO THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. MOTION CARRIED. 3 . LAND USE COMMITTEE Commissioner Teegarden , Chairman , called a commit- tee meeting for 7 : 30 p . m. , Wednesday , October 1st , regarding the Comprehensive Plan in the northeast end of the City and to discuss the proposed new Zoning Ordinance . Mr. Magstadt stated that a staff member would be in attendance . Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 24, 1975 Page Thirteen the City residents retained certain rights through the grand- father clause . "Therefore , property owners could build on lots platted in the County before annexation that fronted on rights-of-way less than 50 feet. Mr. Munson responded that at the time of purchase of the property , some of the houses to the south were not ih existence . He stated further that the topography will not allow access to the west. Questions of Mr. Munson followed with regard to possible acquisition of property to the west or northwest , who indi - cated that a house is in existence in the area desired but was advised by the audience that it ,had burned down . Comments were invited from the audience . Max Pangburn , 2016 N. E. 28th , stated that he had owned his property for almost 26 years and sold most of the railroad right-of-way to King County . He brought the Commission ' s attention to the fact that there is a ' "for sale" sign at the intersection of N . E . 28th' and N . E . 27th , which is where the sewer and road will come in . He suggest ed that the cul -de-sac be rearranged and access relocated in order to alleviate the traffic problem that would be created on the 25 foot roadway. Describing the area as beautiful with large trees throughout and consisting of oversized lots , Mr. Pang- burn objected to the placement of ten houses on the site . Due to ecological and congestion problems , he stated he felt it was appropriate to construct only two or three houses on the site ; and he suggested that the other access be explored . He noted that the area was annexed into the City about 1958. Gary Tischer, 2009 N . E . 28th , advised that' there are several problems and noted that the road does not go through all the way , as it has grown over and that there would be severe difficulties in the winter due to the presence of a hill . He also cited congestion problems that would be created . James Spencer, 2733 Aberdeen , noted large trees in the 25 foot right-of-way which makes the ,area very park-like . He stated that all roads in the area are narrower than indi - cated and inadequate . He stated he felt that additional access west of the Munson property should be looked into , as there are property owners who are interested in selling property to accommodate the recommended widths by the Traffic Engineer and Fire Department. Dwight Lilly , 2221 N . E . 28th , stated that he moved into the area because of the park-like setting and preferred that the neighborhood retain this character. He expressed concern regarding the loss of value to his property if the proposal is approved. He noted the uniqueness of the area within the City of Renton . Eleanore Pangborn , 2016 N . E. 28th , noted that wildlife is frequently seen in the area and stated she felt the proposed development would change that.. It wasnoted that approximately 25 people were present in the audience from the area . Commissioner Teegarden stated that in view of the late hour and large opposition , he recommended referral of the item to a committee for study and work with the applicant and residents of the neighbor- hood . He asked that the staff investigate the availability of the property on the corner of N . E . 27th and N . E . 28th that was indicated as being for sale as it might offer a • solution . . ir Renton Planning Commission /// Meeting September 24 , 1975 • Page Fifteen B, OTHER Chairman Scholes announced a meeting at 8 : 00 p . m. , September 30th , to be attended by committee chairman and himself to prepare four the joint Council /Planning Com- mission meeting on October 2nd . He asked for staff representation . Planning Association of Washington brochures relating to the forthcoming fall conference October 2 through 4 in Vancouver, Washington were distributed . As there was no further business before the Commission , IT WAS MOVED BY MOLA , SECONDED BY WALKER, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED . MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY . 4440isabeth Rivily , Secretary Arthur D . Scholes , Chairman ,t =; °L CITY OF RENTON OFC p4..,.' APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT �� R CL�II A"r, MAR 7 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY „Q 6 1974 Fee $25. 00 ~` 'S File No. SP- 7Lo _7� , Date Rec'd /a/7 t Receipt No. off 4t,NpEp .c APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :A C/9 2 14 3 0 1 . Namt6 A f s -,44.4 le IF o\` I //G , Phone. ,3 Address L�� (, �.� �� ���.L- WAS . 2. Property location /.E 'r (/A L dZ L9.- A/s/"../ 7„.. 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) ' _it,Ca_f_ p2 7 1-J- a', / j/i-c-2-if a7e--zizi:9-,-, , ‘'91f2,--,,i-i.4_,,,,,,,,,,,v- ,1Y4.24' z/9 -q ' ,1-- ? / 6z,(.>1.E-1( 4 . Number of acres or sq. ft. Present zoning 6. , 5. What do you propose to develop on this property? L � , r / _ 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application: Scale A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' - 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) E. A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation . and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in • Section 4-2307 . 5 in addition to the above . 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Date approved 9 --‘,7. - 75 Date denied Date appealed /o -.z --7a Appeal action Remarks 4 ,,, edeI Zvi/A 61,,,./, ,/a,, - ri//cu>.ee7 '//,•h,. 6 I ' Sf ,3a8 / Q /7(y — /^ .' cSXm /i'/ie /?'!y7/. 22 e /. Perm, ,5'Al - -7J7- 75/. Planning Dept . 2-73 revised 1/74 9 I • - 7 - 30. VIEWS OF LOCAL GROUPS : Have you made your plans known to interested community roups or neighbors in the vicinity of the project? yes no If "yes" what are their reactions? If "no" do you intend to contact these people?' yes J524„ • CERTIFICATION BY OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE The Owner/Representative identified in Item No . 1 or 4 above hereby certifies that the information furnished in this Environmental Work- sheet is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge . �l%AGtS�/1442 ga?v )- �.� Signature Title Dat • i 8 _ TO BE FILLED tN 'BY CITY DE ART ENTS P M REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 - 6 - 25 . Effect on Population : Will the.; proposed action directly or in- directly cause the relocation of. a sizeable number of persons or the division or disruption of existing community patterns of liv- ing? yes Mno If "yes" explain . 26 . Schools and Parks : Will the proposed project have an effect on schools and parks in the area? yes no If "yes " explain . 27 . Transportation : Will construction of the project or use of the completed project have a significant impact on transportation in the area? I ( y es jX12c1 Explain : 28. Public Use : Will the project be available for use by all sectors of the public? flyes ,no Explain : 29 . Other Impacts : Identify any other beneficial or adverse environ- mental impacts which may result from the construction or comple- tion of the proposed project. 4110 • - 5 - 21 . Air Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project have a substantial effect on the existing air quality? (Consider the effect of any gas , chemicals , smoke , dust , particulate matter , and odors) ? eyes no If "yes " explain . 22 . Water Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project be likely to have an effect on the existing water quality of the area? (Consider the adequacy of drainage and runoff and the likely endpoint of any liquids draining from the project. ) yes no . Is there a good possibility that this project will requir an expansion of local water and/or sewer facilities? I (no If "yes" to either , ;Rlyes xpain . 23 . Noise : Will construction of the project or use of the completed project significantly affect the existing noise levels of the area? e yes no . Will the project be affected by airports , freeways , railroa or other sources of noise? eyes cK,no If "yes" to either , explain . 24. Population Density : Will a noticeable population change result from this project? ( Consider the present density per acre in the surrounding community to the proposed density of the project and including daytime density. ) f , yes ►ono . Will the pro- ject cause periodic or temporary fluctuations in population due to tourism , employment , shopping , schools , etc . [yes J jno . If "yes" to either, explain . 410 - 4 - 17 . Is the proposed project located in an area. that has a number of ; large trees or other natural landscaped areas , waterways , marshes or wildlife? aye_s no '. If "yes" explain . A/TA2 EN l2 i ✓►- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT : In the following questions summarize what the applicant feels will be the environmental impact , both beneficial and adverse , of the proposed project. Consideration should be given to both the human and natural environmental as well as physical , social , and aesthetic aspect. For projects which are part of a more extensive plan , consider the implications of the entire plan and not just the project now being proposed . 18. Land Use : Will the project have a significant effect on land , use 1n the surrounding area?. ,yes fA no Explain : 19. Project Design and Appearance : Will the project design , appear- ance , landscaping , etc. , assure the maximum protection for the natural environment? Xyes n n o Explain : 20. Ground Contours : Does the proposed project have an effect on the existing ground contours of the project location? yes 1no . Is the project likely to cause erosion or sedimentation? (1 yes 1no? If "yes" to either , explain . 7-% c w i ) G. nice c-i F ; 11 r •5 -. 3 - • 12 . List any other permits for this project from state, federal , or other local : governmental agencies for which you- have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so , the date of the applica- tion , whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same , and the number of the application or permit : Date Agency Permit Type Submitted* Number . Status** /l7a'N * Leave blank if not submitted. ** Approved ,, denied or pending . 13 . Has an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assess- ment been prepared for the proposed project'? If "yes" ' submit copy with this l� yeso environmental impact worksheet . 14. Are there similar projects , both public and private ,, existing or planned in the immediate area : yes ! ' no don ' t know If "yes" explain . 15 . Is the proposed project located in or adjacent to an area or structure having unique or exceptional historic , cultural , or other values considered important by some sectors of the popu- lation? yes no If "yes" explain . 16 . Is the proposed project located in an area that may be considered sensitive and is subject to erosion , landslides , floods , etc . ? , yes no If "yes" explain . !! ' 0 r • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON OF �© ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEETv. 4 44R ...ciy,v ,i FOR OFFICE USE ONLY : 7 �. Application No . -�i&1- 9- 7/ Negative Dec . � 8, p-ARI'ks" ` ' Date Received '//7y! EIS INSTRUCTIONS : The purpose of this information is to assist the vari - ous departments of the City to determine whether an environmental impact statement will be required before approving and issuing a per- , mit for a proposed project. Single family residential uses in non sensitive areas are exempt from. this requirement as established by Washington Administrative Code 173-34 . In addition to the following information , please submit a vicinity map ( recommend scale : 1" representing 200 ' to 800 ' ) and a site map (rec- ommended scale : 1" representing 10 ' to 40 ' ) . APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 30 BELOW: 1 . Name of applicant moo'/2sz,_S' W . if/? �o.5— --� r @ c 2 . Mailing address ea 1ga) to ZO $ �/9-77—Z� 1,4(Y..)f-,- Telephone 2`4-2--)V-- C) 3. Applicant is : • . 8-wner r 1Lessee !`Contract purchaser COther (specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone 5 . General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection • f a • . 2 - 6 . Legal description (if lengthy , attach as separate sheet) fAar- 7 s 6�/o,�z� �'�o. 3 z 9.�S � Jrx �h�-r�o�-n� � �' E y7�, 7p u> H: - 2 3 — It) v fe-1- 6Z r4-„i Cs-E. 171.g 9 ST Gfi < jv� o u Pi- ) 7 . Area . 6• I/ ItOIZ S Dimensions 8. Intended use of property or project ( include details : number of units , volume , etc. ) : o � � cr 9 . Generally describe the property and existing improvements : C,/15 g,z E b — /V o )..4 f K-u ✓ G \ 10 . Total construction cost or fair market value of proposed project including additional developments contemplated : 44- /O(J, oa0 . 11 . Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested : Begin ) - 1 9 7'/ End " 197.E S S •`'`1 • - 10 - ACTION BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL A. Staff review determined that project : Has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects . May have significant environmental impact and a complete environmental assessment should be prepared by applicant prior to further action on request for permit. B. Reasons for above conclusion : Signature of Responsible Official or Authorized Representative Date : Form: EIS-1 Planning Department October 15 , 1973 - 9 - REVIEW By OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ,Department: Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date IP 41. AFFIDAVIT I , Re. it =-11- ' 7; r,l a o-A. , being duly sworn, declare that I f am theAowner of the property involved in this application and that the // foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to t — of my knowledge and belief. ici OF �� �F��/� Subscribed and sworn before me: 6 4, this Co day of to cN vL� , 19 'IL( , LI �'? �1 Notary Public in and for the State of ��'` Washington, residing at ��, G ° L'vr\,Q)C l'A - \-\WIL-4-' X--4,0,-.7n,- --1 (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of .Owne- ) /42,,.f c a W ^-e y- ; ' oS e, /,,, ea P//-/4*v-t_ (Adder"s) `'___, (Address) . �,L , A � gsea // k I Vv a sNf (City) (State) G 2Z � — O � 5� (Telephone) • • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) ' CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been foun thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the 6.Fake ulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the C' 'i�gCF` ND ® application. Vp iy"..,_,. 11,7 c(.6 i fp Date Receivef TIMID qls. , l9 By:rvu✓,d a R•® . • � � 5i0 Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 j. , . , • . . 42/ , ` I' r \ , e9 e SC4,�S,E,tL•Lp4 O s , /VG7 . J �/, I, , , 4' ,1 }' 1.44'' •''4 `fit �;`!u'•,, ,} • •• "'' ':11 (psi. I Itlry t'k'j L�+lb'r�C.+;'• , ;fr'�! .i, y4,' ' ,' 1 • .. Fi • !' •, '4 ,I�JS�;q'I'4•}i'.I� :M,• , ;i,r, {Sin• ;• a.., • M1 I h,'• t', ,ns"�,qP},;L,t 4}� . 'h •,• + •��. • ;i:! t `.• 'j)F.. . �J�y : } 1 x + i'' •¢'�I': t.' • • �w11:„t,I Y,� ierl{;3.' S t, J • j• 6 • �J • I'`, p, _ �r ' � .1 ! O til ' '441 14 13't•,, lx"' !1 t ''i� _'. `�• 1 WI? ' i7 PM 2 27 FH • :. • 2 4 7 iF ,,, �t t.�'�y,�aa, 1:„..,,;II r. , gu' .n� 1 ' ryti r1rt r.*•r:t • ii 1t .•"- C.•I! 12 •• 1.• I DINECTOR ' ' Ea ai l,r"s.s' } 'T ! Q;* �.1,•t iII m. , oo..ovi a ELECTIONS ' R !!{{. xA, „ . 'fis.i . I �I ! •;, I1 t cculdrY.WASH, ' ' t 2 h Y• -:a IP". } ' w 1. Itt.x, t-+1 cn 1 I , . 1 •I • t by �t ,' FORM Ltd} )t %t.,. yiµ 4 � 11" 'Statutory Warranty Deed e!,, w '„, r 3.fL:S Thi P-AID "/15 +1• ,e;Vir 1 t! >+". r.. THE GRA:4TO! 'i RICHARD E. BOW and VERL BOW, his wife, who appear of record as ,t ,) +*° • L,, ,. , •;t RICHARD EDWARD 00W and VERL ROW, his wife, as to an undivided one-half interest and �i» itj a, .„ j! 4 qICIU E �g BOq, h sppar es te, as to an u divided one-half i eras fat aedta et ii fiN b6LLM3 117el�f and other > a and valueolo consiasrations, .�+4411 t •9 114(4i. �. � In 6�paId, 0!ud to ASCENZO LEO SCARSELLA and ANTONIO SCARSELLA, d/b/a i d s,„}. ly" ri SCARSELLA BROTHERS, INC.',,a partnership, t YI , TV S*seated cud tNa s skutnd is the Con"at Kiwi ,Stated I d P -f 1 1, 4. The south 329.e5'"fest of that portion of Government lot 7, section 25, township n I4' c 23 north; range 4 oast, M.$.,• In King Countye,Washington, lying west of Puget _ i "" ' Sound Traction•Light 8 Tower right of way and east of county road. EXCEPT the , , , 41r ,,r res t east 15 fest.tharaof for'road and Ions purposes; ii '�v , �' -i.�7f.1`fir C y`, '°�Pit 11t8 Ce7CC J _;._ au' I' • y,IIA }"5T t ''rt . } $ tiiriUtu .' • •�� -I JY=-- .- aAES TAX PAID 0!i CO arm, No 1 y { li'. p AFf. �`a'a'. 1 s I'V ' - ^ r • t'Ad{P1, ` '-,{';',1IM %' ! iiJ.`f.WiLUASIS.DING COUNTY TREASURER '' t ,' ' r .io ,[ 1 n''' • ' =, ti 4;1,tI ;1 :9cls''"47 m, ;i r �'3.4. � '�t''�A Itl '��' a I' '1 'r ..e , I I� I ij i ' '• 1 o Tbla deed{{; eve Is"►altllinknat of•that eereata real ii�o•¢eatratit Between the parties hereto, ,1 1 t• 1 • ,t P"'•+ moo', Jig um, Sift I,;• s,°I• I, , i� , sad ooadittoaa$l st tba ooevepance of the shoe +.i ",i tj i;1'1 ` 'Rt + 'deacrlb"al:prnterty�hitd'IWIt,O rari4.s'of wartpaI r berate doatalsid shall sot spot,to any true. }, I '' ,, t.lot neat di accuabreate,tpiniDI;b,.ufitosab or bedew t1S1pa,c a t,la*aid contract.and ghat!not i, 1 s y ri0 ,4opl1 to sins iti1.':eaa.aaaeate atat es anartaa'lorip�, anaa sad or becoming duo subsequent' •' Ms,iii 11, i' to Lb.duce of enld,00istrs' I's'*� "., ., ": ;"1 '^;; I ' f t U -, R i • q{5 • , t g�'�i♦��i Iq '1'• ( Tirl 1'�73;L '1 i 4 fl � �, r, 'subtect tp an eueeme��i1tl,Tea�rtp+tot�,is feaeiatiultt dfltyaytd.t1*Pi. ' : r ,,i,...1.1., i7b'4_,, i1 4 11l h,40'1 T• s,q "' �.'i t 1',<, �':t' ,1 l I ry it 1.4, r� L ' ,'' ' a ��l}ki t .!� ,, �{':,����'l,'i,rgii��l' ,}' �t {1r dayef Janudf�yi_t961i. ' •' ' If i I,`, $,a ry :7' ' " 't G`! a,'•I :I• _+,t'1.1,y , }i,`.10.1.1r 1i Vt .J' , .q xR,114 '" • It14 ;., , T .t (tu,t.) f,I'l , i*, 11 1i ' ,1{ ,Y.:d''r.L , -�, • {,''t'i "p,,, 1:-. ' .' iz tasty) elf iii )4II} fl ' ,4 4 `':'vl'r, STAtie O} WASU LrO1) ''4''''�1 N , • , ;r};, .,'u,= w 1 1;�,,,,y I , '•'- t dt T I ' r li.) *y ,�,4, ' . '• et ItfktO ::I,,' ,`f., .°s, !w' it i'• ' i., i' . # . n1 ''t -,17 ''w ,d,i, "( GNU* ,4,;;;:.,'I 144 '• .r. :,,1 '� y c ' }1. %, i,f,1,r 1 1n1 ...,i,• 'Obtbadlyperaa;{{gyappwadbeefaae Richard E. Bow,and•Verll,Boa • II I ¢ '1'1,°I i', ''.k 4•^, +1 to stq,kgapa I.b,,die iAI,,, a Hussain In and who maned ed'the within and fe eivdrl loetrarent, and j� '! 'Ia�V.P11` ,r p "It s; , etiaorkdf�toll'r' Oeri.,' signed the tarn as their ' Dal said rdunury as and eked,for the I.I' I m i Pit 1• 'i' . +tea erg putyaaa tSaat t wsir}M[f1 1 414 Z Ii I i.. # r '1'GIVENS uhu'sr ay Let d'M elicW mai Ail (97 , day a{)ei vt`9-v'4 j, »6 V ' l,1, riai L 1 I , P;;1 }L •1,4 1,T t " 1 }; ' ltj'''''}„j , e/ Ili Ikr,r{;I' i 1j.} R•,,1 ,, rl I•:,t •.Sd,,}`,Y /�fg�/pj,, OV Q� 7.11, i'�•• ` j¢� 1 '•t: 1 'fi ,''' ' '')' �4 AlY,4 i-11 ,the S Q YII, ,1 IIlj'i.: t i�li`Y dr i��. 4< trt' xr r 4II 4 p` t'44 `' }' dr'l 4i' •y4'1 ' • 1 fiddl•e 0. .,fie�. 't'; —' —' +t'';!Ali If i p,i lAi i I �,1`.i t �,"• • ` Irk I G.` t u V ~;+ `� {tj '(, p1 u y, , n, In, ;,'••,I'ri••' I v t'I, I'G S 1',,'. st, r, r , Sj f , y �{ f (, 'ir I pry,,„'St.rr „ "h. 1, "If' 'I 1 II". I'l l il.i: f I5 ;I,�_ . . ,'�(a 1l'pit zd'z'.. �.,�1�,,�s.:.a1 'Its ,.. ..,I. , . ,.. 1 ,ke 1, ' I, 1' e,tn. ,r t l�.'.,_... 1>� ,I: .. • AFFIDAVIT • • I ► ,e,v n./a 4' /4# , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this ;7 day of���vG , 1971/, C, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at?7„4,-,e, __/"./„, I • //. /3.Pos•• 2- y/ /\• // • j y (Name of. Notary u is ' (Signature of Owner) i� ,{",C s i fl • (Address) faz. (Address) /�- r✓� • (City) (State) • (Telephone) 1,1 (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) {' CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to is conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning. Department governing the filing of such application. Date Received , 19 By : • Renton Planning Dept . iy 2-73 r/ . . . . Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON . • • COUNTY OF KING ss. • M.2'•bazta••C being first duly sworn on - oath, deposes and says that Shgts the C11cf C1,Q of . THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a tri-weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for • more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a tri- weekly newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in An office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton . ` Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of --_- the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King County, n TICE OF";;'-:';, r''" located on east stile of Union :? Washington.That the annexed is a '• n�.�21I2�I1Fr C01'IIli t33'�t)11t ` . PUBLLIjC HEARING•"',:.,•,' •.:`''Ave:N.E:approximately 500 • ....;-,...RENTON PLANNING: :.'.;,.,,...;.feet south of.N.E.4th St:'.",•.•...; C G•• permit 1100•P z Onto COMMISSION ` ; '. ".4:APPLICATION" FOR'FINAL; '..RENTON,WASHINGTON,' PLAT APPROVAL, file No.' A PUBLIC'HEARING WILL BE.'..,-:,-:`.. FP-836-75; property located- HELD BY THE RENTON PLAN- ~, on N.E. 27th'St: between as it was published in regular issues (and NING COMMISSION`AT ITS REG-::,4therdeen:Ave'.,N.E:,and not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period ULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL`�i",. Edmonds Ave:•N.E:>•","^-•, ',: CHAMBERS,'CITY'.HALL,.REN='=> S.;APPLICATION<FOR PRE-::,: TON; WASHINGTON'tO:N;%4, VY!,LIMINARYs'PU1T"•APPRO=":4 of One. consecutive issues, commencing on the SEPTEMBER24;1975,at8:OOP:M:L;i°ti' VAL;sfile_No:;.'PP-8.38-75;;'.y 1 TO CONSIDER_THE FOLLO.WINO''; `.:j'.property located on N.Er 28th i t PET0NS:: :?=-St'between Jones Ave:N.E.: i a- r day of `lG'�t t I71, 19-...a5..., and ending the 1.SPECIAL!: PERMIT 'TO i ... .and Aberdeen Ave.N.E: ,' •ALLOW:-FILLINGi-'AND:;:::.=:ALL,INTERESTED PERSONS - "' r GRADING IN M-P:ZONE,file,,;,.TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED, day of , 19 ,both dates " . No. SP-760774; property. y'•TO BEPRESENT AT THE PLAN= inclusive, and-that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its " located.approximately.1200.A..NINGCQMMISSIONMEETING,ON, subscribers during all of said period..That the full amount of the fee •"• .feet north of S.W.43rd.:onc' :SEPTEMBER 24, 1975.AT•8:00. • 'West Valley Highway.,::r ' ;/,P.M.:TO EXPRESS,THEIR1 • 1.7•zu '2.REZONE FROM.G TO B-1; OPINIONS.. charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ , which file No. R-821-75; property •ELISABETH RIVILY; has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words located on east side of Union: ;- SECRETARY,!RENTON for the first•insertion and per folio of one hundred wor for each : Ave. N.E. approximately,A00:;, ,-•.;;;;`-PLANNING COMMISSION, feet south of N.E.4th St.-,. . ;'a :f Published in the Renton Record= • subsequent insertion. • Jj 3.REZONE FROM G TO R-3,;sr;_ChronicleSeptember•14, 1975; /0--.14--e- !i file N• o.R-82Z•-..•Property:`;R3462.`fi.' .�. .�_ ' V OM of olctrlc • Si'ibscribed and sworn to before me this 19 day of • • ›ejgt• 19 75 . ._Cif.V Oft.,-,/ Notary u lic in and for the State of Washington, r filing at Renton,King County. -Passed by the Legislature, 1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective :rune9th,1955. • • -jWcslcrn Union Telegraph Co.rules for counting words and figures, adopled by the newspapers of the State. . • l NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON , WASHINGTON • A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON SEPTEMBER 24 , 19 75 , AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PiETITIONS : . 1 . SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILLING AND GRADING IN M-P ZONE , file No . SP-760-74 ; property located approxi - mately 1200 feet north of S . W. 43rd on West Valley Highway . 2 . REZONE FROM G TO B-1 , file No . R-821-75 ; property located on east side of Union Ave . N. E. approximately 400 feet south of N. E. 4th St. 3 . REZONE FROM G TO R-3 , file No . R-827-75 ; property located on east side of Union Ave . N . E . approximately 500 feet south of N . E . 4th St . 4. APPLICATION FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL , file No . FP-836-75 ; property located on N . E. 27th St. between Aberdeen Ave. N . E . and Edmonds Ave . N . E. 5. APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL , file No. PP-838-75 ; property located on N . E . 28th St. between Jones Ave . N . E . and Aberdeen Ave . N. E. • • • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 24 , 1975 AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. ELISABETH RIVILY , SECRETARY PUBLISHED September .14 , 1975 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I , WILLIAM C. TURNER , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES. ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn l / to before me , a Notary Public , SIGNED GI/ 0// /arc.v�_ on the 11th day of September , 1975 . . >22 • . A idciv�# 04 Pub afrvo - • , .• STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY 01.'KING ss. D.Yrbara Caitipagn 1 • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING being first duly sworn on RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON:WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE, oath, deposes and says that ..Sale is the ChLof...Cler1C of HELD Y THE RENTONPLAN- NING COMMISSION AT IT REGU-. THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a tri-weekly newspaper. That LAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 27, printed and published in the English language continually as a tri ,1974, AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: weekly newspaper in Renton, King County, Washington, and it is now REZONE FROM G TO M-P; file and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the No. R-757-74; property located on ' aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton east side of West Valley.Highway I Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of at intersection with Strander Blvd. the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1; fi:e No. R-758-74; property locat- County, ed at N.E. 12th Street between i Washington. the annexed is a RcD2t) ing from G to 1•t� ote Kiikland Ave. N.E. and Jefferson !; gAve. N.E. REZONE FROM G•TO M-P, file • No. R-759-74, and SPECIAL PER- MIT TO ALLOW FILLING AND ' GRADING, file No. SP-760-74; 1 property located approximately as it was published in regular issues (and 1200 feet north of S.W. 43rd on not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period West Valley Highway. . 1 SPECIAL , PERMIT TO CON- Cn® -STRUCT NINE DUPLEX QUILD- of consecutive issues, commencing on the INGS IN R-2 ZONE, file No. SP- 754-74, and REQUEST FOR EX- CEPTION FROM SUBDIVISION 17 day of 1°lC�l 19 74 ORDINANCEending the ORDINANCE FROM 60 • FOOT is • PROPERTY FRONTAGE REQUIRE- .• • MENTS, file No. E-753-74; proper ty located at N.E.'8th Street be- - • day of , 19 both dates tween Harrington and Jefferson inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its N.E. • subscribers during all of said period.That the full amount of the fee • WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IM- PROVEMENTS IN G-7200 ZONE; file No. W-755-74; property locat- charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$.12..,.7which ed on N.E. 14th and.Kennewick Ave. N.E. has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words •ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each OBJECTING 'TO SAID PETITIONS subsequent insertion. / ARE INVITED,TO BE PRESENT AT • ' THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON MARCH 27; 1974 AT 4,,,. .)f k= A9 Z�� 8:00 P.M. TO.VOICE.THEIR PRO- •TESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME• ' I chief °lar{ Bylund V. Wik, Secretary RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION • , I, MICHAEL L. SMITH, Y • �. CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIESEOF \/ Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 'THE ABOVE 'DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CON- hath 74 SPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROP- ,19 ERTY DESCRIBED 'ABOVE 'AS.• PRESCRIBED BY LAW. '• SIGNED Michael L. Smith ^�A.r„4Yc4..- C.E-1,-.4---Ct ATTEST.:Subscribed and sworn to Notary ub is in and for the State of Washington, before. me, a Notary Public, on \, re .ding at Renton,King County. the 14 day of March, 1974;.. ' Harriet M. Hilder Published in the.Renton Re- • cord Chronicle March 17, 1974 -Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective. , R215t;,.•..... June 9th,1955. -Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MARCH 27 , 19 i4 , AT 8 : 00 P . M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : REZONE FROM G TO M-P ; file No . R-757-74 ; property located on east side of West Valley Highway at intersection with Strander Blvd . REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1 ; file No . R-758-74 ; property located at N . E . 12th Street between Kirkland Ave . N . E . and Jefferson Ave . N . E . REZONE FROM G TO M-P , file No . K-759-74 , and SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILLING AND GRADING , file No . SP-760-74 ; property located approximately 1200 feet north of S . W. 43rd on West Valley Highway . SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT NINE DUPLEX BUILDINGS IN R-2 ZONE ; file No . SP-754-74 , and REQUEST FOR EXCEPTION FROM SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE FROM 60 FOOT PROPERTY FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS , file No . E-753-74 ; property located at N . E. 8th Street between Harrington and Jefferson N . E . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS IN G-7200 ZONE ; file No . W-755-74 ; property located on N . E. 14th and Kennewick Ave . N. E . ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON MARCH 27 , 1974 AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME . SECRETARY PUBLISHED March 17 , 1974 (' RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I , MICHAEL L . SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY, ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. p47. /ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn z to 'before me , a Notary Public , SIGNED on the 14 day of March Michael L . Smith 19 74 . 6VkA_Li\IN . Valb . • (Ccr r--sel/q ;rcro -Ohre,/o/C. • 6-i' -73C Public Notices Road. Legal description on file in Planning Department.office. 5. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILLING AND GRADING IN B-1 • AND R-3 ZONES; file No. SP-775- 74; property located at southeast • corner Union Ave. N.E. and N.E. • 4th Ave. Legal description on file in Planning Department office. 6. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IM • - PROVEMENTS IN G-7200' ZONE: • file No. W-776-74; property locat- ed on 27th N.E., between Ed- monds Ave. N.E. and Aberdeen _ ve. N.E. Legal description on file NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING in the Planning Department Of- fice.RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON,WASHINGTON All torsans interestede or ob- A public hearingwill be held ed tog saide petitions are invit- A ed to be present at the planning IV the Renton Planning Commis- commission meeting on June 26, at its regular meeting in the' 1974 at 8:00 p.m. to voice their Council Chambers, City Hall, Ren- protests or objections to same. ton, Washington, on June 26, Published June 16, 1974 • 1974, at 8:00 p.m.to consider the BYLUND V. WIK, following petitions: Secretary ' 1. REZONE FROM G6000 TO R- Renton Planning Commission 3; file No. R-756-74; property lo- ' CERTIFICATION • cated on Lake Washington, south • I, Michael L. Smith, hereby. of and'adjacent to N.E. 52nd St. 'certify that three' copies of the Legal description on file in Plan- •above document Were posted by • ning Department office. me in three conspicuous places 2. REZONE FROM G TO L-1 OR on the property described above' M-P; file No. R-774-74; property as.prescribed by law, • ' located West Valley Highway • ' SIGNED• north of S.W. 43rd and south of Michael L. Smith ' Hill-Raleigh properties. Legal de- ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to scription on file in Planning De- before me, a Notary Public, on, partment office. the 13th day of June, 1974. 3. REZONE FROM,G TO M-P Harriet M. Hilder ' AND SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW Published in the Renton Re- .FILLING.AND GRADING; files No. cord-Chronicle June 16, 1974., R-759-74 and' No. SP-760-74; R2798, • property located approximately• - 1200' north of S.W. 43rd on West Valley Highway. Legal description on file in Planning Department • office. • 4. SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW' FILLING AND GRADING IN L-1 ZONE; file No. SP-768-74; proper- ty located at 3000 East Valley r//7 9wur4e//4 .. Cre.e.`H-/ Per. . P y NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE -HELD E' D BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON June 26 , 1974_, AT 8 : 00 P . M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. REZONE FROM G6000 TO R-3; file No. R-756-74; property located on Lake 'Washington, south of and adjacent to N.E. 52nd St. Legal description on file in Planning Department office. 2 . REZONE FROM G TO L-1 OR M-P; file No. R-774-74; property located West Valley Highway north of S.W. 43rd and south of Hill-Raleigh properties. Legal description on file in Planning Department office. 3. REZONE FROM G TO M-P AND SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FILLING AND • GRADING; files No. R-759-74 and No. SP-760-74; .property located ;approximately 1200 ' north of S.W. 43rd on West Valley Highway.'• Legal description on file in Planning Department office. 4. SPECIAL 'PERMIT TO ALLOW FILLING AND GRADING IN L-1 ZONE; file No. SP-768-74; property located .at 3000 East Valley Road. • Legal description on file in Planning' Department office. 5. SPECIAL 'PERMIT TO ALLOW FILLING AND GRADING IN B-1 AND R-3 ZONES; Bile No. SP-775-74; property located at southeast corner Union Ave. N.E. and N.E. 4th Ave. Legal description on file in Planning Department office. 6 . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS IN G-7200 ZONE : file No. W-776-74; property located on 27th N.E. between Edmonds Ave. N.E. • and Aberdeen Ave. N.E. Legal description on file in the Planning Department Office. • ALL !PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO 'SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE ' PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON June 26 , 1974 AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO SAME . • BYLUND V. WIK , SECRETARY PUBLISHED June 16, 1974 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I , Michael L. Smith , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE PO TED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . A-iTST : Subscribed and sworn te- to before me , 4 Notayy Public , SIGNED 7 on the q) day : of wiN.e, 19 `1'1 . ���K\): •\M \� � CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON PERMIT SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT Scarsella Bros . Inc. Appl . No . SM- 2$-7= Applicant : Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions : 1 . The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal , state , and other permit requirements pe f rmit This may rescinded pursuant to Seion1 4(7 ) ofatle Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event thepes rmittee comply with any condition hereof. 3 . A construction permit shall not be issued until forty-five (45 ) ' days after approval by the City of Renton Planning Department or until any review proceedings initiated within this 45 day review period have been completed . 4 . Pursuant to Section 14 , Chapter 286 , Laws of 1971 Extra Session , the City of Renton has taken the following actions : A . Q APPROVED B . 0 DENIED C . REASONS : 1 . Approval is partial in accordance with condition ( 1 ) for westerly portion of property . 2 . Proposed development while within 200 ' of the Green River will not have substantial impact • on the shoreline. 3 . Development will contain adequate storm water retention and oil -water separation . 4. Development ilosl sroflwildlifesuitable habitat , and soften to help mitigateproposal .the visual impacts of the pro p • n . CONDITIONS : 1 . Approve only the westerly three hundred (300) feet or to the top of the existing pond , whichever is less , until final determination of suitable wildlife habitat mitigation areas made , are established. committments for their preservation When such determination has been made the planning department shall approve the remainder of the shore- line permit subject to the same conditions as specified herein . (see attached page) I / ' G f ` August 18 , 1975 anni • Director • City of Renton ce ; /,(.�? ,c�..�,.,, . Planninn "� ' _ • . I l� Rey . - i e �.r. • .tom (i YA ti D . COND M ONS : ( continued) • 2 . City of Renton Public Works Department approval of : a) storm water retention facilities capable of retaining runoff so that no additional runoff occurs from the site over that which is presently generated by a 20 year storm. b) oil -water . separation facilities . 3 . City of Renton Planning Department approval of: a) detailed landscape plans suitable for screening purposes and mitigation of lost wildlife food and habitat in accordance with Soil Conserva- tion Service requirements . b) Addition of earth berms , minimum 5 feet in height , for screening purposes as approved by the Renton Planning Department . 4. Final approval by Renton Planning Commission of Special Permit for filling and grading and site development plans . 5 . Subject to all appropriate local , state , and federal laws and ordinances . f. ROUTE SCHEDUT,F =; PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED_3 Sfrf • PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR; REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT 6F-7/3071 . PECIAL PERMIT , P%4 C312O5 (6 , WAIVER • SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE, BEFORE SIGNATURE OR INITIAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE 7-)7;)4 UILDING 3 • FFIC ENG. CAL, I, •NGINEERING ; • FIRE • HEALTH ` REVIEWERTS COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : La At .A \) -) b-Ct4.), c-I C S Iry / C- I A i T A) LA 4_c_ C EAJ L .L.E 1. a, LE). ast. STAFF REPORT RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 24, 1975 I . I ' APPLICATION : SPECIAL PERMIT #SP 760-74 for Fill and Grade APPLICANT : Anthony Scarsella LOCATION : Property located approximately. 1200 . feet north of S .W . 43rd on West Valley Highway. ' COMMENTS : 1 . An Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared for the proposal . 2 . Comments received from several agencies including the Soil Conservation Service through the Environmental Impact State- ment process request that the pond should . not be filled until other suitable wild- life mitigation areas are established . The SCS previously established the pond as a wetland preservation area , and states in its response to the EIS that "any variance from this plan must meet the approval of the U . S . Fish and Wildlife Service , Washington Department of Game , and Soil Conservation Service , if the two Green River Watershed projects are to go forward to completion . " A study is also presently being undertaken by this Department through a HUD grant to determine the effects of the valley drainage project on the various wetland and wildlife areas of the valley . 3 • The. EI Sµ.a;nT'Nt.h.e:µ:s u b'j ect �•a p p l i c a t i o n .have been -'.rev.i.ewed' bythe Special A,� Studies Committee 4 . A partial Shoreline Permit was granted allowing fill , grading , and development of the westerly 300 feet or to the top of the existing pond bank , whichever is less . This- would apply until a final determination of suitable wildlife miti - gation areas have been made and firm commitments for their preservation are established . STAFF Recommend approval of a partial permit to RECOMMENDATION : fill and grade the westerly 300 feet or to the top of the bank of the pond , whichever is less , until final determination of suit- able wildlife habitat mitigation areas has been made, and firm commitments for their preservation established . When such deter- mination has been made the Planning Depart- ment shall review the remainder of the fill and grade plans as presented subject to the same conditions as specified herein . September 24 , 1975 -2- Scarsella--Continued Conditions of Approval 1 . Earth berms a minimum five (5) feet in height shall be established along the west , north, and south boundaries of the property for screening purposes subject to final Planning Department approval . 2. Utilization of suitable erosion control methods approved by the Planning Depart.- ment . 3. Storm water retention facilities capable of retaining runoff so that no additional runoff occurs from the site above that which is presently generated by a 20-year storm , subject to final approval of the Engineering Division . 4 . Suitable sedimentation control methods subject to approval of the Engineering Division . 5 . Final Landscaping Plan subject to Plan- ning Department approval . Y- STAFF REPORT CITY OF RENTON JUNE 26, 1974 APPLICATION: REZONE - G TO M-P APPLICANT: SCARSELLA BROS . , INC . LOCATION: Approximately 1200 ' feet north of S .W. 43rd on West Valley Highway ZONING: G APPLICABLE 4-725, 4-729, 4-730 SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: REQUEST: Applicant requests Planning Commission approval of rezone from G to M-P . COMMENTS: 1 . In order to evaluate the environmental impact, staff has requested additional information in the form of an environmental assessment . - 2. A draft environmental assessment has been received as of June 25, 1974 . In view of the date of submittal, review has not been com- pleted. 3. In view of the existing filling and develop- ment that has occurred on adjacent properties on the West Valley Highway, the proposed rezone to M-P would not present a problem, assuming no further filling o£ the site and development in accordance with M-P standards and S .C .S . requirements . STAFF RECOMMENDA- Recommend M-P zoning for site in question. TION: APPLICATION: SPECIAL PERMIT FILL APPLICANT: SCARCELLA BROS . , INC . ZONING: G APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF Ordinance 2820 Mining, Excavation, Grading; 4-722 THE ZONING CODE: REQUEST: Applicant requests special permit to fill subject site. COMMENTS: 1 . Environmental impact of the proposed fill is presently being reviewed via the environmental assessment mentioned above . 2 . The westerly portion of the existing site can be developed to M-P standards without requiring additional fill . 3. Allowance of additional fill on said site should be held until review of environmental assessment and need for EIS has been completed. STAFF ,RECOMMENDA- Recommend continuance to July 24 for reasons noted above. !TION: Special Studies Committee Meeting September 22 , 1975 Page Two The exception was considered to be appropriate because : A. Although 25 feet is inadequate for the proposed 10- lot subdivision , a 50-feet wide right-of-way would be detrimental to the area.. Fifty feet was considered to be the minimum for such a 10-lot subdivision because of the impacts of traffic on the area and the street system. B. A reasonable width that could handle a certain amount of additional traffic from a reduced density together with adequate shoulder and pedestrian/buffer widths on each side was determined to be appropriate for the - particular area , and would not be detrimental to adjacent properties . C . The physical characteristics of the site and area (i . e . , unique natural vegetation , proximity to a major park , existing development in the area , and the limited possibility of future development in the area ) are such that a reasonable exception is justified . 2 . Scarsella Brothers , Inc . : Special Permit for fill and grade. The Committee initially discussed the comments from the EIS , especially the Soil Conservation Service comment regarding the pond ' s relationship to the proposed wildlife mitigation areas and the Soil Conservation Service drainage channel project. They reviewed the proposed grading plan , site plan , and Shoreline Permit and felt that it was possible to allow much of the proposed development through a partial permit , and satisfy the agencies that opposed the filling of the pond until other suitable wildlife mitigation areas are firmly established . The final adoption of the Comprehen- sive Plan would solidify the specific areas to be retained as wildlife mitigation areas . Reference was also made to the study of the effects of the P-1 channel system on the wetland areas in the valley , presently being conducted by the Planning Department through HUD funding . • Committee Recommendation : The Committee recommended approval of Special Permit for fill and grade for the westerly 300 feet or to the top bank of the pond , whichever is less , until such time as a final determination of suit- able wildlife habitat areas is made as per the Soil Con- ..servation Service requirements for the P-1 channel drainage project . R i b Special Studies Committee Meeting September 22 , 1975 Page Three The approval is subject to : • A. The establishment of earth berms a minimum five (5 ) feet in height along the north , south , and west side of the property for construction equipment storage area screening subject to final approval of the Plan- ning Department . B. Storm water and sedimentation control methods as approved by the Public Works Department. C . Utilization of suitable erosion control methods approved by the Planning Department. D . Final landscaping plan subject to Planning Department approval . E . Suitable measures shall be used to control dust and sand during the fill operation . MLS : vb 1• THE CITY OF RENTON n o 8~i MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O/A �o AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 c 235 - 2550 TfO SEP1-'' September 17 , 1975 MEMORANDUM TO : Files • FROM : Michael L . Smith RE : Special Studies Committee Meeting September 15 , 1975 Attendance : Larry Gibson , Chairman ; Bylund Wik ; Logan Garrison ; Michael Smith , Planning Department • Items : I . Scarselia Bros . Special Permit for Fill and Grade , Appl . No . SP-760-74. A. The Committee discussed the various alternatives that could be recommended and their relationship to the comments received through the Environmental Impact Statement process . B . Staff presented the Shoreline Management permit that was approved and listed the conditions of the permit. It was stated that as a result of the EIS a partial permit not encompassing the pond area was approved at this time . C. The Committee wished to review this aspect further prior to making a recommendation and set up another meeting on Monday , September 22 , 1975 , for the pur- pose of making a recommendation for the September 24 , 1975 , public hearing . II . Kennydale Firs Preliminary Plat Appl . No . PP-838-75 . A. The Committee conducted a field trip to the proposed site . B . Upon reviewing the site , the. Committee expressed the following concerns : 1 . Adequate access to the. site without destroying natural character of the site and adversely impacting adjacent properties . • Special Studies Committee Meeting September 15 , 1975 Page Two 2 . Proposed density of the site given the access problems and character of the area . 3 . Feasibility of the proposed sewer line exten- sion to the property given the topography and the small stream west of the subject property. Also the possibility of extending the sewers to allow connection of certain properties in the immediate area was discussed . Staff indi - cated that this would be further reviewed with the Utilities Division . 4 . Possibility of allowing reduced street widths and improvements (curbs , gutters , and side- walks on both sides of the street), and the addition of covenants controlling tree cutting on the site , to preserve and enhance the char- acter and value of the property, and reduce . impacts to adjacent properties . The above items were to be discussed in more detail at the next meeting : Monday , September 22 , 1975 4 : 30 p .m . 3rd floor conference room • cc : Larry Gibson By W i k Logan Garrison MLS : vb &ay.I)TeLartrik (Iv' uttei c.: AR > THE CITY OF RENTON Z + aa MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 v n j % 4;7 AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235 - 2550 O,QAT'co SE PI,-4� MEMORANDUM August 28 , 1975 TO : Files FROM: Michael L . Smith , Assistant Planner RE : Planning Commission Special Studies Committee Meeting of August 28 , 1975 PRESENT : Logan Garrison Bylund Wik Michael Smith , Planning Department DISCUSSION : 1 . Highlands Church of Christ No information had been received . .12 . Scarsella Brothers , Inc. Reviewed and discussed the EIS and alternative courses of action regarding the Special Permit . Staff presented its actiom on the Shoreline PErmit which consisted of partial approval with conditions . The Committee indicated that they would consider recommending this course of action to the Commission . They discussed the need to set a public hearing date on...the ' matter and agreed to recommend to the Commission at its September 10, 1975 , meeting that the hearing date be set for September 24, 1975 . 3 . Glacier Park Draft EIS The Committee had not completed individual reviews of the EIS , but did discuss some of the issues briefly. It was felt that a seperate meeting was needed to completely review the EIS and possible Commission action on the Special Permit Application . MLS: rh R4 `lam U 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR Planning Department o��TFO SEPt0,0 MEMORANDUM July 23 , 1975 TO : Environmental Development Committee FROM: Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director RE : Scarsella Final Environmental Impact Statement • • The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Scar- sella Brothers , Inc . , proposed office/warehouse/storage facility has been completed and distributed to you and the other Commission members . The Committee can now proceed to study the final docu- ment and make its recommendation to the Commission re- garding action on the Special Permit request for fill and grade . We recommend that the Commission set a public hearing date and advertise as soon as possible , to be no later than the regular September public hearing date . MLS : rh ‘N. THE CITY OF RENTON " '': a o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH.98055 no AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PA "� 235 - 2550 O�4TeDSEp . July 2 , 1975 MEMORANDUM TO : Files FROM : Joan A. Lankford , Assistant Planner RE : SCARSELLA BROTHERS , INC . , ENVIORNMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT I met with Mr. Alan Austin , attorney and Mr. Antonio Scarsella , Scarsella Brothers , Inc. , on July 1 , 1975 to discuss the following items regarding the abovementioned project : 1 . A complete review of th,e items to be included in the final EIS document , in response to comments received by agencies reviewing the draft EIS . a) Copy of comments in document provided to Mr. Austin to supplement verbal review. b) Copy of comments to be kept on file in the Planning Department office . 2 . Copy of "Response to Comments" prepared by this Department and copies of all letters received by reviewing agencies to be typed and furnished to Mr . Austin for inclusion in the Appendix of the final EIS . a) Mr. Austin notified per telephone this date that they were available to be picked up or that they would be mailed July 2 , 1975 . 3 . Mr. Austin was advised that upon receipt and review of the final EIS , the following would occur ; a) After printing (by applicant) --the immediate mailing and distribution by this Department. b) Planning Commission review and action on the request for Fill and Grading Permit ( 1 ) Mr. Austin and Mr. Scarsella to be notified of scheduled date of public hearing . Memo to the Files July 2 , 1975 Page Two 4 . At his inquiry , Mr Austin was advised by phone that the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan would be heard by the City Council at the meeting of July 7 , 1975 . 5 . Mr. Austin advised that as soon as the printing schedule could be established , he would provide this Department with the final EIS documents for mailing . He is most interested that this item be considered at the Planning Commission Public Hearing July 23 , 1975 . 6 . Letter has been sent to Mr Austin and a copy to Mr . Scarsella as a follow up regarding our meeting of July 1 , 1975 . cc : Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director JAL :mas !/// g t THE CITY OF RENTON ' ' ` MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MIL LAVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ol AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT op ? 235 - 2550 aTFD SEPI- i May 2 , 1975 RE : Draft Environmental Impact Statement ; Scarsella Brothers , Inc . Proposed Office Building , Warehouse/Repair Shop and Storage Facility , Renton , Washington The attached draft document is submitted for your review pursuant to Washington State Environmental Policy Act , Chapter 43 . 21C , RCW . The Scarsella Brothers ' special permit application to the Planning Commission for filling and grading will be reviewed by the Commission after distribution of the final Environmental Impact Statement . Should you have any comments , we would appreciate your response directed to the Planning Department within thirty days , June 2 , 1975 , pursuant to the State guidelines . If you have additional questions on the subject matter , please contact the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director • `-I UZ Cal' 1 I .? • i 1 � r _ 2 C MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 TI•lE CITY OF RENTON Oo) po V AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT o��TCD 4g) 2 3 5 - 2 5 5 0 : April 11 , 1975 Mr. Alan F. Austin Montgomery , Perdue , Blankenship & Austin 1515 Norton Building Seattle , Washington 9810'4 RE : Scarsella Brothers , Inc. ; Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Austin : This is to confirm our telephone conversation of April 7 , 1975 regarding the abovementioned document. The following items were discussed : 1 . The final draft statement 'will incorporate those comments noted on the Department ' s copies which I mentioned to you on the phone . The Planning Department would like to review the final draft prior to printing . 2 . One hundred copies should be provided to the Department. 3 . Cover stock needed for the first sheet. 4. Address envelopes , as per list noted in the draft document. 5 . Provide postage , including bulk rate plus additional postage for first class letter which will be provided by the Planning Department. Thank you for your cooperation , and if you have any further questions , please contact the Planning Department. Very truly yours , • "Joan A. Lankford = Assistant Planner JAL :mas I IC.) THE CITY OF RENTON o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 op co AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 'O 42- 235 - 2550 �O4TED SEPPE' • MEMORANDUM April 7, 1975 TO: Files FROM: Joan A. Lankford, Assistant Planner RE: Scarsella Environmental Impact Statement I called Mr. Alan Austin today advising him of the comments noted on the rough draft statement, to be incorporated in the draft document. In addition, we advised him of the following items : 1. Need cover stock for the first sheet. 2. One-hundred (100) copies should be pro- vided to the department. 3. Address envelopes, as per the list noted in the draft statment. 4. Provide postage for the above item, including bulk rate plus additional for first class letter which will be provided by the Planning Depart- ment. JAL:rh " THE CITY OF RENTON 'z o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o O AVERYGARRETT, MAYOR -.4) PLANNING DEPARTMENT �4 �� 235 - 2550 �ATfD SEP'N -�� MEMORANDUM April 3, 1975 TO: Files FROM: Joan A. Lankford, Assistant ,Planner RE: Draft Impact Statement Scarsella Brothers Inc. Mike Smith and I met with Anthony Scarsella and Alan Austin March 21, 1975, and reviewed the staff comments on the first draft of the impact statement. Mr. Austin re-submitted a revised statement March 31, 1975, for staff review. We will contact Mr. Austin April 7, 1975, with final comments and information regarding final dis- tribution. JAL:rh • • 01'• • THE CITY OF RENTON 2 o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 40 � 235 - 2550 4)4 TFD SE EP1 • • MARCH 14, 1975 • • Mr. Alan F. Austin Montgomery , Purdue ; Blankinship and Austin • 1515 Norton Building Seattle , WA. 98104 RE : Scarsella Brothers , Inc . Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Austin : • The Planing Department has reviewed the Scarsella draft impact statement and would like to meet with you as soon as possible to discuss the department ' s review comments that need to be incorporated in the "mail -out" document . Please advise us when it would be conven- ient to set a: meeting date . Very tru .v yours Michael L . Smith Assistant Planner cc : Antonio Scarsella • • • • • • i• • SÔ.i-I '1Co-nseivatiôn• Sery ce _ , •want, . s, to sa• . ve .duck pond The Soil'Conservation.Service thinks a , mosquitos. But Leroy Shearer,general biol- small duck pond near Orillia is•.worth say- ogist for the Soil Conservation Service,says ing — even if Renton Planning Director even a dried-up pond is valuable for wild Gordon Y.Ericksen doesn:,t. - • '. . ,life: ' "The area...is highly,desirable'for.pres- , ""Periodic drying of-the area.,.has the - -ervation of•wildlife that uses wet-habitat," beneficial effect of setting,back the vegeta- says;W.L.-,Cokeley of the service's Renton „ tion to something:less than a choked condi- office. tion when it next fills up The pond .and the. area around it are —thereby benefit- * The owned by Tony Scarsella, who wants to fill` - ting the ducks,„Shearer says. • the wetland and more his construction,busi Shearer also says young ducks are usual- -is north of SW ty big.enough to fly elsewhere by the time ness onto the site. The pond their pond dries up. 43rd Street and east- of the West Valley Highway. 'Drying.up..,is most often late enough in Renton Planning Director Ericksen has the season,so that the broods are.:flighted required an environmental assessment of and can fly to-larger bodies off water still the proposed landfill, but he said last month existing." •" •he a didn't think the,pond was worth preserv- The biologist says when a pond dries;up, • ing. *plants like smartweed, get a chance to Instead; Ericksen thinks a'larger pond- grow. , • ing area could be created north-and east of "Seeds of,smartweed`are high quality - .Scarseila's pond. , `' ; t q Y �. duck food and,.are eagerly..sought when the- However,-'the Soil Conservation;Service' r `wet area fi11s up,"Shearer continues. - has suggested the pond-be-saved for wildlife ; ° Scarsella first applied.for a permit to fill. as part of the government's Valley,drainage , he pond.last February. The planning de-t ' system. •�; partment,-reports his detailed`environmen-" Scarsella has argued-the pond dries up/• tal.assessment of the project has not yet in the summer and is`a breeding ground,for been;reeeived° _ I a . I ' c.)~ OriTHE. CITY OF RENTON z o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 •13, (o AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING' DEPARTMENT '0 � 235 - 2550 TcD SEP�,4�� October 25, 1974 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Humble, Chairman Comprehensive Plan, Committee FROM: Gary R, Kruger, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Valley Comprehensive Plan ' Listed below are answers to questions raised by the Com- mittee: - Which side of the Valley Freeway (SR-167) does the SCS wish to place the P-10 Channel? Bill Cokeley indicated that at the present time the SCS is favoring the eastside. This would minimize the protests of the property owners along the west , side of SR-167 and help establish the rationale for designating the east side as a wildlife habitat. , Additional engineering and cost analysis needs to be done, which includes the recrossing of SR-167 and •,the East Valley Highway and whether such recrossing cost could be considered part of the project cost or a cost that must be borne by the , participating governments. • Will the Scarsella pond be drained by the sewer that was recently installed along the rear boundary.? • Bob Berkstrom of the Renton Public Works Department doubts that might happen. Although gravel was employed in the backfill process, the area was so wet during con- -' struction that such •a limited facility would not have much impact on drainage. Even if there were some drain- • age, the space between the gravel would eventually 'silt up and halt any drainage. Bill Cokeley shares this opinion. • • • • • Don Humble, Chairman Comprehensive Plan Committee October 25, 1974 Page Two Has the Planning Department done any work on providing trails in the Valley? Preliminary policies concerning the eventual development which mention trails have been submitted to the Commit- tee. The Department has worked with the Public Works Department on proposed improvements of S.W. 43. This street is to include a pedestrian and bicycle trail along the north side of the facility. . This Department has made an application to ,the Bicentennial Committee for a trail along the East Valley Highway, Lind Avenue, Seventh Avenue, and Edwards St. (private) . Will the P-1 Channel drain the pond south of Shell? Cokeley indicated that he doubted that it would. First, there would be large amounts of spoils from the construc- tion of the P-1 Channel that would act as a dyke. Second, the natural drainage is to the northeast, and the pond is caused by fills blocking the natural drainage. How- ever, it is possible that P-1 might reduce some of the water supply and thereby reduce the size of the pond. Next Meeting: Wednesday, October 30 , 1974 7 : 30 p.m. - 3rd fl. conf. rm. P.S. The SCS ' s EIS on the Valley should be available in about one month. cc: P. Seymour, Committee Member C. Teegarden, Committee Member I • _ r Renton Planning Commission Meeting October 23, 1974 Page Seven B. CITIZENS SERVICE CORPORATION , APPLICATION R-765-74; Rezone from G6000 to R-3. It was noted that Citizens Service Corporation has advised that they are withdrawing their applica- tio•n . C. LOUIS B. ROWLEY , APPLICATIONS R-787-74 AND SP-788-74; Rezone and Special Permit . The Assistant Planning Director advised that the Louis B. Rowley applications for rezone and special permit with regard to property located on Park Avenue North between North 30th Street and North 32nd Street have been withdrawn . SCARSELLA BROTHERS , APPLICATION SP-760-74 ; Special Permit. Assistant Planner Smith noted that Alan Austin , attorney for the applicant , has been recontacted regarding availability of the environmental impact . statement, which he advised would be forthcoming early in October. Mr. Smith referred the Commis- sion to information received from the Soil Conser- vation Service relative to the ponding area on the site and noted it will be included in the review process . E. P. A. W. CONFERENCE , NOVEMBER 1 AND 2 - EVERETT The Vice Chairman noted the Planning Association of Washington fall conference to be held in Everett on November 1 and 2 and asked who wished to attend . Commissioners Scholes , Wik and Seymour indicated their interest . ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN,SECONDED BY GIBSON, THAT COMMIS- SIONERS SCHOLES, WIK AND SEYMOUR BE AUTHORIZED TO ATTEND THE FALL CONFERENCE OF THE P .A .W. IN EVERETT, NOVEMBER 1 AND 2. MOTION CARRIED. F. OTHER "CITIES FOR PEOPLE" The film, "Cities for People , " to be shown at the University of Washington on October 30 , 1974 , at 8 : 00 p.m. was discussed. Representatives from the Planning Commission and staff will be in attendance . W. STEWART POPE - REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO COMPRE- HENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commissioner Gibson gave a report concerning the City Council public hearing regarding the W. Stew- art Pope request . • As there was no further business before the Commission , IT WAS MOVED BY MOLA, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN , THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting was adjourned at 10 . 45 p . m. 2 ar y Gibson , a ret ry Norm Ross , Chairman OF -v THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 pV co AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT AO��T 235 - 2550 EO SEPt����� September 26 , 1975 • Anthony Scarsella • P. O. Box 6205 Seattle , WA 98188 RE : Scarsella Brothers , Inc . , Special Permit for Fill and Grade No. SP-760-74 Dear Mr. Scarsella : The Renton Planning Commission at its September 22 , 1975 public hearing approved your application for fill and grade for the westerly 300 feet of the site or to the existing , , top of the pond bank subject to the following conditions : 1 . Storm water and sedimentation control methods as approved by the Public Works Department. 2. Utilization of suitable erosion control methods as approved by the Planning Department. 3. Final landscaping plan subject to Planning Depart- ment approval . • 4. Suitable measures shall be used to control dust and sand during the fill and grade operation . 5 . Establishment of suitable screening methods along the north , south , and west sides of the property for screening the construction equipment storage area subject to final approval of the Planning Department. Decision on the remaining portion of the subject property is contingent upon the final approval by the City Council of the revised Comprehensive Plan for the Valley area. This Plan , when adopted , will establish the location greenbelt/wetland areas to be retained in the Valley area pursuant to the Soil Conservation Service resolution for the Valley Drainage Chan- nel Project. Smith to Scarsella September 26 , 1975 Page Two The Commission felt that the subject approval would allow commencement of filling and grading on the site and provide for reasonable development on the site until the above decisions are studied and finalized . Of course , you also have the option to appeal the Planning Commission decision on this matter to the City Council within ten days from the decision date . Any appeal should be in writing and submitted to the Planning Department . If you have any further questions please contact this Department . ' Very trul y rs , ichael L . Smith ssistant Planner MLS: vb cc : Alan Austin Public Works Department ee°arre//4 ti4 OV (� �9 : PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON . o MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • 43 if- 235-2550 'sAORI CAPITAL c � October 21 , 1974 - Alan F. Austin Montgomery , Purdue ,.' Blankenship and Austin 1515 Norton Building Seattle , Washington 98104 ; RE : Detailed Environmental Assessment for Anthony Scarsella Proposal for Fill and Grade a - Dear Mr. Austin : Pursuant to our conversation of September 25 , 1974 , you informed us that the subject assessment would be forthcoming in approximately ten days . It has now been over three weeks since that con- versation , and we have not received any communica- tion from you . It is imperative that we receive the informa- tion which you are preparing so that we may expedite the EIS and Planning Commission review processes as much as possible . Attached are some recent communications from the Soil Conservation Service that you may wish to . add to your assessment . " `. . . If you have any questions , , please do not hesi - tate to contact this department.. ,Very truly,... u '. { Michael L . Smith Assistant Planner ., I o . . _0 ' . ..................... W -ELD '.._ .;-,..11::::; .2:; ii-';-:‘'‘ jia.7.1W14. C...IF 4';&:.L'4 C Li LT 6,1:4 E . 0 ..',-1 2 1974 . „_. ; 17,47,-.07.... . .4; .. ; .. • rrIt TZ/rx? , ;11,-i,f, ' .• 7 r17.. - " "' .00.- - ''-,is,.. lii4-.L--hni-, '.' ' . ' "'"'rirliiiii.104-41410,410,WOROP' .-ft mai r 110 3-I '.-;L6U U o:-.•o ConnLI:A-,, spokane t, as angto , 920 ) I . Pi:11're: BIOL - Wetland Habital Values . DATE: September 27, 1974 . . . . , . . . . ' . . . . . • . . , . , . . . . . • - • ' //A ' RECEIVED 401.2„ , . lalliam L. Cokeley . , r •. . •. , . Pr 6 jia et: EI.12:1-ileCl: . , . . , • -.... v.,-.- \ . . , , . . . . •. •, . . ,. Soil Consc:1:vation Service . . . , . . • • . ,. . OCT 4 1974 Renton, Washington • .... ' • .,.. ..., . . , L ' -4 - . .' , ...0,„ smosaborr....•••••••••••• 4 .,. , S-,.... ...,„..44/ . , WV' . . . . Following up on our telephone cenversatien.teday 1'4 like to 'put I "v a few points on the value and .use made- .of wetlands by ducks, in G DES!______ particular the wet 4rO4 49rth of_l8Qth.,and east of the.West Valley _ __ f , 111.ghway. .. , , • . , . . . . , ' - -,. • ., . , , ' •„ .,.. . We typed this area as Type 4 due to the depth and. permanency: of the . . water as well as the vegetation. ,A. Type 4,can, and does, go dry at - • I . times, particularly during periods of. long..-dry spells.:-. I 'th*nk we-, :',_.--. can agree that this summer ad fall has been ,snch a ,period. „ .= • „. , .. . . ' ' .. t .' , •i At first, this may seem to'destrey the:value of• thearea for ducks. . . Not so, in all cases! While, it is-true.:that we•would prefer a permanent,.. k. • year-round water area; such areas soen lose ,all their valise as they : . . , '‘ . ' 1 . become overgrown and choked with Vegetation.Such as: cattails., bulrushes. . . and often willow. Thus, It becomes- necessary 'to cloar' eut such vegeta- . .„.. ,,, . tion to retain open water and• cover inllroper:preportions. .'.- Periodic . •'•: . ' . - ,. - % drying of the area, and even agridultural*.activities during these dry_ ', -, ,,:, _ , periods, has the beneficial effect ot: setting back the vegetation to • , ''._ , _ . _ t . soething less that a choked condition, when' it not fills. up--therebY : —:: benefiting the ducks, , . • , , . . . In most cases, wetlands of, this;type 'ate used -both'byl)reeding.ducks .' , and later as areas Co raise the 'breeds: -.Drying:upi.of 'a Type 4 is most ,,,, often late enough in the season, se.. th413 ,t4P7brOods:,4t“1.tglItqa and can . . . , fiy to lurur budias of water. still e4s4ng, i i „ .. „, , ..,, , ;,-,,,,,,. ',,,, : ,,. ,-: ',4,-,,,, ,.,.1,,,,,......, ;•i: - !;:,•,,",., !i; ,',., ',.• -,':,',:: ,,,,:::,,.;.‹ ':, ' ., "',.', ; • Ahc:,.: fringe benefit of lowering, the Water. leveland :.even .drying up..-Tf,,::: . , votinilds, is the change .in, conditions; that iiaw:0,ants...co-goFrpin4•4e'.;''''' ..- i Plants such as smartweed z.,,.re cenrapn'Under ..theso,..;e0nd*tjons. . Seeds- of.-:!•:.--.--,--- ;„.•.:---.-.; .,,:--.----, C:.'..7:::::‘,7,2,2,11 0.1711 11.1..i;11. CIL/4-4.-.1:t y:c.l.itelc' foo0;:,41:10: al-.7qci..ccf,p);9y,' c.)90311-1:;:.'91,ipp the ....., .......7,. :.„.‘,r.;.';', ..,, ;!•.,.i. . Tic. al..oa i,ills up, In susidliary,, the drying up of: wetlands'::is.'not,'Vd1: 4ter to',dneFfs;-;,-it 4 P--,'-',7 'y . '-'' ‘1.,,;'.'.;;.'':., ',•: . • a natu.1:41 periodicoccurance„, %0 most,-,pasesthekyalue of the-areahas .. , .--, , bee.n reall:!,ed--the hatching- illad;:rpail7ing::'.of 4.-'-'broocU'orl:•broodS, of. ducka.,:::::,;-. ...'•''....:., ,v ' - er, _ C.,V (::-6;`• ' ,''.,-.'";1.'-,,:,',-.,'':,',..l..:'.:-,:::,y":--'-2,'',t'3:r:''▪ t'/:'-,;-:.=,',;,-„'':.,::„'-`.:!'..-,,:','':i:-1;,-,:,:-',::4::s:-,-.'.:„:',.;;':-4';:-',l-,.'';-.:,,,.-1• 'L6 Shcar,cr ;,,'„-'':,,.::"':--,-'-'''':',',._:''-',-,'-.,':-" ,.Y.::.,;',',',,.?).1‘,-','.'.:`'''',.'''':.::.',-'-,',.''.,1'.,'•':-::'':'.''--'_':'':':''',f::-',-.'• C-.2 nOr 21 Li pi og i S t ' : -'‘,:;:„. .2 l'--;-:•'..?,''.-..''.-'„;:"::,- .-:'4:',.::'''.'...i,.,'':i'f',,r,',!,:,.X:.. :':,--',''''..;.'-:'-:::-...::1:,;.--.. " ':',"' f* ''..;:'',i-:,''':" %.'0,',.;'',,,;.:'Y'','`'`'': ' . ''' ''...':':',:: , -',-;:!,:;,1:4:?1',,,',' '''.'..!:-:; -,,...,',1:-.';'. •',",':-:- 'i,'". ,-,!;:.-,.,'-i t:1'-',,,i'.;- - ' '-'..'',:,:'' . ,:,:' : ,.---1;;,',.,","‘,,,,' ,,:-i.'.•.'-i,.'4,- -,;,";'",-,:j ;.—,,..,, ..,',..,-.3,2,'„,;-.1„ ,,,;,,,„-t,r.o,.,0.;;k',..k d''..1,r f . , •r',;•I.f,.,1 ,. . •., ,, ..•,,.•`. ^.r ' '' ".::' ,.' • •'; '.•.._:.: ri, N,;:1=' ?,:l'(,:`*7\,;). -L ,::C'r,,, ., ,,k, 1;',1,:%,,, ,-,L,-,v.,, ,:... ,,, , ,..,...,,,e ,: .; ,, ,,,i. ,, ,i,r,J;, i.,.:`.: ',.'',. '•.,:'...W'',-'':?'e..' r'--;',, ,I4:"...!'.,'-y,„'-.« t‘' ' ' S,., _..":;;;;':,,;,'.'4',,,. .' .. • .;! ?';.,' ' '-' :'''':" 'I''''''S''' Pt'' '' r.:.'' '.';''.-- :,,..::. ./...',1., i„ ,;,„'• L,:,, , ,, -,: ;.1,'";:"':,' ;,.. v" -. 1,', '...':.."': .1.:.'''...;''''', -.:i - •'..:5,- ; 4'▪ .:;.:":':7,1:.,,',::-7, '' ' ,,,,, '[ .'..' ''.;,.:',-,,..i,ir.: -,'" .,;,-' '- ' :.,,:,!',.: „,.,L• ,.-„...4.,-,,,7-t!,',„ - •-,-,4P...--,:-.' ,,:,-..:-..- ,,,'-, ,',- e-,:-,,,, is,,-,,-,.,,n,?A.,..',--,,,,r.* ,,,,J,,,,-:,-,H ,:rrm.I.4.;.;.... .L..;L.,:.:4 .,2,,,..:..'c,.-,:i . • ,,,.,-•,..„.::,..,,,, , ,,,,,,,:_,- ., ., ,,',..,...,. .,•,...,1-2 .,,,4,, ,,,,,,i,7.:-;, , 1-.,i--,--. .,:,• . :,. .. , , .,,,..1.:;•,. -,- t . .y,.0,h-,,,,,.,..,...,;:...,.-,,,,'.•.;.:-, ?,-..t.i;,...,,, ;.,•;,,t,-,:,,i- :, :',,,;;;:„;-.-.14.,,,. ,.......orsomomo..........,i ,-i!: , .I.`,IC'II.;h'esA•• •', r ' " ' ,'...--',..''. '',f ''',,a- c'''''.•:?,r,;,,,!,;0:--t:,:-...-i-,,,,..'1A.',:t'r''Ai.Vc!: . -4,.g,'j".fi.cri '',4,'.-..':,,t't,q '''''''.!? 1' q•':'.''''' .'". •'24'....:'•":-..„,-..2.,„, . .,....l't.r1V„',..r,i, •,-':.'"•,.;4.:44,E..:,-, ,-. ,..,• -' . *. • . 1 . . I . . .• '''. ., ',,.• . .2.-..;,..'7,..,"1,21.,:...:',.'",,. ::.,..,,,..,•.,i.c,1;•.f...."::::,'..,;.;.,.. ,,.- ..•,.....•,..-1,,,.••1:- •4,,-',P s.•-•,.,•...4,•.••,•.. . . . ", , ....,•,...-• • ••."....-,,'. ••:.'.1.t.'6...'r'..":,-•'. .:'. "_• • '' :r',".-•.'''.'..;'..,';'• . .0• : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT.li.11?. AGRICULTURE 't•i.,4:,,,-. ;.•••.' :• .,....". ,...,i.,„.:-...,....,..:•",c,I',-,,it„••',.. •:.,::•:,- - '..t.'..'..'i-Y.''''''',.. I • " '' - , • • •, ., ,„4.-,'..,.,•-:•;,•?-!",,-, ..•. ••...:'-.,.-i, ;. '.. .,••••.'.-.;.....'....:L.,--;:•;..,,,......,, .-:.-:'••••••.',. '; ,,:r....,:".•,,;:,;: SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE .• . _ ' 4 i,,::••.,..i , ,-!,.,-.: ..::'..7.....!.. ,;-: . . .., . .. . . . . , . . , - ,-•.,:i :;.'...:::'..',.„'.,,::,,,,,•,.:.', .,!..„.:,4,„„)r.:: . 1 '• . ' . . • . t. . .• •• -..''' :!'', '• ' : • ' ..'.4- '.':"".'1 'i.'-'•':,..i. ',.. ,.;•{...;,...,....:;,,.1,'.,',. . , • . ,. ... '1.: : • ..-:•";;;--';'',-'•,,,,-,i,''.:- ''..,..,..-;',....i:',.10.,2 T74 ••:_;.- ••,'„).-..,.,,,.,„•,..,...,..,,-,-- ,,„•,•:•. .:,,, ,.....,,<.,,,..,_,,:., . . , -.• . - - - '':-.'•:' -..---.•:.,.--',"...-:=•;•-•",,.•-:•,--‘„ .A.., .- ,"',.,.,. ',"•,••,'-....j:•.,--:.",,,y'-i,::,,:.,.:,--. ;.. 127,,,-.,.:•t, . . . . ... , • , - .... ... . „ ,, .,... ...,....,„..,-,..,,...,..,,.•,..„--,,,,,,,,,,.-.,,,,, ,-.... ,,,,-".... •-v•,•,,..:,--;,•,•-•,-.,---,,,-..„.:,-:,;,•,-,-,•,-';',..t.,•••...,:::.,,,, •,...,,s.:•,,,,x;•,,,,, . " , . • .,. :.,.. . ..;„. _.,„ .....„,. .„...,,,-..,..4'e,,,,i',!'":.,•,!!4•'''',...,,:!;•.." .,: .'.../...1( • .; . .. . ,'".,..,.:',...7.. ,,.... ,-;-",.;..+ : ':‘'..`f c'''''.."1:''.'.• . : : . • ''': '' . . .:.'; ;: • ::!-•.-:?., , ,"t;; . , .;:: ,2. ....):--.-'..',(-;.!,',,. .,',,,4 . •• '.. .',''•':':','';:',-?..i'.:.'i 4-:-.....7-,::':..---.i P. -.' ,'•." '-';'.',.:''.1.".'':L ''.?I'T''[..-" `:.:'-•;•. ' "1,..'.,:..t;:..;;:•.,7..,'...:::• :':.•1-,.••- :.k.•:;i:;,;,,•'.',...-,1...'2,?1'..-•',:',•!i:-.',-..'•;;!:"',J';;;'-', t;.....',..'!....,.. .. .'.'41:3'...-r;t.,`,.7.2?,-,7'''.,.f;';'-';' .,r,'.j.,.:•,;,,Y,'''.•;:'i.'x.,--,ir!:::,,,•:,4„,..;•,:',,,::::!-..4,-;:,...:'.:,..•',-.. t•,i:vv....-,!:••;; . *' .• 1 Ms • Joan Langford,,,-. , •, „ .. ..,., •,,,,h,•-•- ,,,,:,,,,,,.:,1..--,,,,,,,,,,,,,,e.,f..:,,,,,:,-..;:..,:•1•,.-;,.......„.„...,....::.,,,,,2,....,,,,:a...,• ,•.,.•,•1_,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,-.„.•......,..1•,,,,,,,,,,,,.••:, Renton• Planning Dept.: , ..,;;$,.1i,, -., ,.,-.,,, . ..?„,,...„,.k.,g,-.;,43:,:r,;;.‘,,,,i,7 ,•:,,,,,,,,,. . .::•:,,,,-;,•,.. ,..y:,.. ..,.. ,,.t,.,,,,,:.,,,...,,,:,;,-,,!•,,r.!.,,..,.,..„,.,.: . . -,,,,,,,,,...,,,-,., ,-, .-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:i.,,, ,,,,. •• ,,-•,,. ,,, 1,-,,,,: ,-: •,.,,,.,.,.., ,A.!.,,,.....-., •,.: ''•' . , Renton Ci ty Hal 1 • - '..., :,.,,,,, ,,----,-,_,•-:,;',•:•::',. .:-...,../--,: y1,--,-n.::•;-:::.1-,:;•:,:„.=,,,,,,,,,,,z;•!: ,..,-,..•,..:.,,--:.-.:,•.,., :<,::;.--.....„:...-;„,:.:,.;-y...,,,,,,,.;.,-..::-..,,,-,,:.-..-,,„,,,...:,,.. ,...,...,..,,..„;,,,,,,,,,, . 200 Mill S . - •• -• =:.--i-f-',,!"--,'..J-,.----•••-'-,,,,,''''-T:•,..4.-',44---?;.1.,;.:F.,.:::::,,:hc:I.,.,...................-:g•-•:...-: ;'.: :;';',7',.."• .-ci..;..._li',‘.,,,',.,..-':.'1.',.':..':, ,..t:''.',',"...':' ,.':'.` Renton , Washington . '. 980.55 -•;!:a :t.',:-L';2511 , ..,. ,4114 ,. .,,;: . , , • — , , -...- ',-- 'IT', '''' .'';; ‘.-.'. . . ' -.. 4'':'''" .'-' :':'1 ': ''''' ' ;'',. -;i'.•'.. .-; '':- . • . . . • , ' ' • .... „ ;..: -„7.::t'.••'"- •:•''''''''•' '''.t,-.. •'(: l'.-‘.7: k ! • •--'.-::-- '. '::'.2. ;.: .-.-;1'',.',,r;i:.1.,..''',;_P-•:,....2',' ;;''.',.;',.'-.1.;;,':,; ',1-•-,; . . _.... '''the .:--k,,,.•;.r.".":::',':i.:.-`i;.•;•.':',',.'''':•.-.:;',•'..,....;.,..:, l'-.t.-..1,::,;;;,.; - - --. from',-Leroy- '•;',, , „ ..., .. • . -:•,...,- .'," '.'.1.,,- •"-'.,",••(;''3,.;u:-,'.';.',;';':',',-,..,,.:‘.,F,:.:..4.....-:•.''''''''',v.-:-./...1-,,,,,T, ,to The enclosed letter ' $111rerreferS ,-.. . „''. '.•. ,'.,.'....t • ••• .,...:,`,1',i''',..:;;'.'•; ", 2 :, :. ,4,.....••', '':''..:`: ':,,i i`-'ir:'...:'.'1';''''.--3'.!'47'',•':','''''',,,: ,.'.: •-:',"';'::,:•?;;', SCarZel 1 a wetland.-..., .., .-.. ;.--: , .,„ .,-,,,., :,:•....,,.-..,:,, ; :z..t...-..,,:,-..:--,...,...: ,,,-.,,,•,,.,..y, , ,,,*,,, .,,,-.1,-,.•.:,,,-,,,,i-,.!,•-;:yy:.-", , ..-,,;•,'. '1',,,':',•,-',„i,,!,;,.i,; ' i ; ,.•:,.,. •-• ...„.,-,.. ,,,,,''','...,-„,,• ,,,.....i•••:,;.,- ••-.-'.-..- .:-.^.'•'. -, '.:',-,-,;'.'''''X'''''''''';-.''''.'.:'''..7.-';'-',.';'''''' '-'' '''. 'i • Don ' t worry ibOut':the -:146* i•114*::.6.0.":s aliS,:,,it-E is eH3 " becaq§e -it has — , .: c , , , ,,, . ,. 's ome ' or . the -.•,:•.,•,. .',.4'..i..‘-,, ,,,,P..!.r..,,i'•,',/ :,'4,. .3./_Pe:JIT,:: ::,&Y?e-''.,;', ..'' - ,',": :::::71::: r:,4.' i - and our maps shows type . than,.',,-:,,;.;•:;.,•:f-', .,....,,,,'.:'..ri. •.,,,,, ...,,,,-, ./.,,,:, . characteristics of • both .„,,....Normally' type: ;4'1 s deeper ' -. ,, ,;',,,,,,:....2..,.:„,.-;i:,....y,....,,:.,•1.-,, ,:r,t:',.. type 3 in the rainy season there : areimi nor differences ','-',;:. ,..,.,,,,-.-H---... ..'(...,::•:;,i.,..,:,:,,,.:i , :. .4.nc1':-,,,, •.• -...-.. -. - -----, -- .. ,• • ,-. . : • . ..•,...,,••,-:.:,:- ..:..,.--,', -,.. ' ,,..:•::.,..',,....„- ' - ,-; ..- •:?--..- • • ,, f ----• . ',,':.,:-.2.•:,--';i:'.,),...:.'..,:' • •'.. i '.,.• .:,,'"i:, - ,'':-- ' '' ;`..1.-.'-.,y.;:::•;'.::''..,-;'-... ',-•r:i.::.:''''t i n vegetation . '.;. . • - . .,•J,.---,: :•,.,.,......--, -,:-if ,.: ,.t.',•..i...,;,,•.--. . . ..,, • .. ;-,:,,-../ ...•:: ....• '.....:-.1.;•,,,,,.•• :-. , -:..5,,;:.. .,:;'-, - - '-• - ,..• :•-• -•- ,.,•,-:-,...--.-- ;_'-*--,i.: -:•\.,.'-::!:',-..,,'..,,,--,.---,..;--.."'-'-.-.; . ,., •. .. : .,. .• " ,: ... - ,,,..---:,.•:;. -, ,-, , .. !..,',.-4/•,-..!. .:1 ' ''' ' ' . .C some.; of . the :., ...:,-;.::;,....--..,.• ,;:-. •,•.,..- ,../ , The area could be -improved. by: knockihq-,00Wh . . trees and making-More' oper.1 ,water:_and :ls . highly • ‘,.,::: .,,.;,:. ,•••,,,,,•,- . , •, - ,t,,,,-,,,••,,,,;, .0esTrO. . e.: „.",.-.,,,. .,, ,,, ,• -. .,),. ': .. --.,-.!.,1.-i •• for preservation ' of i wildlife. 110.P: 4ses wet habitat,:.-.---,,,,,;,.!i, : •,-,--, : : : :.•:-,-.--..-.. ., ,,:',1..-;--',:.-,,,,.;-:,,,•:,,..,...,-. • 1••••„:.,,-,;,,, • ,, ' .., „.,:::..••..,..::-Th..,.1,,,,.-,,,•,.i. ,•,b; .,..,,, .„ .;,,,,,,, 1,,,..-., -, - ...., ..,- • -,, - ,•,,,,,,---,,L. '1,.,",'"..., '' . ,-,: .r,;".''ee' . . • . . •••,-,'.-,:: ..•''-:,' ,"••,,,,, ::-•:....,'-'.';,':.' .6-,:,....t,•,- .-;,;:.,r.••7-t-..,-,0„, 4,..,.‘4,,, .„.._,.,:, •,, ,,,,.;.,.,-,•,,,.•.,..,,.,..,,.„....,,,,,•,,,,,,,.,,,,,.,, • ' ':'''.... i',1'f^.•'''.*';1 'r ',A.C.:,:("'I'-'1 •1''''''i"??,•4'1,-:k&I ? :.,....g'',':'::4,,'%.''.•...'t.,:e4-.,r,:., :'''''.'-'1:-, ';‘-'',:';':'','",'..'•:-",V.',•';.....",.:;.'. .'''', ,.-••'! .''''..j.f .' bd • ' ::' !':..':'..'':•;r4T'./..:,,,'; , :;•,:•;',, r ' -;(;, ;•-••1:1 ;ik• , .." , :::,:1,,:„.)..,. ,,,;,.c..;.,•,;'.!".,-•.,,,t,':;,:,._.....,:,iv:), .;'.. .,.4.,:,..,.!,.!,...., . i .„ ....i.,`.;:i,'' ,, ,;•'; , ,, ,,,•-•. .;‘!'..5',2.,'..., ,:''''n,%,::'...-'...,,,'..-t;,.!.,..'4•:,'•-'','''-;':'•-1..• • 1.,: -',4,-1 •• ...-.•*. '..--•f...*:" ', .".'-ferr...•''',i-'•;'.1.:-...•.!;2,r,/':-.7-,'::-',,.;:' ',. ,,i:g-..7.'A.)•.•,.''';'',''',. '',1, 1.! • ....1c'. .i.r...,,,-...-,..::..f.,'•7',,'•:'';.. •' • '''' '.1,i' w. L, Coke 1 ey -", ,. •-. ,.(•,:,.,;.-.:,,..._...,,...: ::,„"....,.,•,,-•-:-;:;,...5.-.:':,.*?...-,7,•,::,....3.....ii,y.,,•.;.t,...:.:?:::.•4?.,2.,:..1.,...?......,:i::,,,,,,..,„::...,,..„,....::,,. .-,,. .;•,•..-.,.-4,,:• .,-,,,-;:,,..,, .,....,,••-,-,..:,,,. :,,,,,•,;:. ' • Soil Conservat • ov,50TY.Tc ., 44.;Og. . 2n'. , , , ..,.. f-..,,1 - . 232 Main. Ave . o. • ' .,:` .::::::' :,:,,,"1.-.;, ..',,,.,! .'7.f.;,•.,•',,,•,,`--i.;•:,, .-,,-,f,,,i.ir-ii." '1,'•,:-..1. ;,.., ,,:t,,,•?:,e;,:::..": ,..;, ,-,,y!-...-':.it...:4, : -.:::...,,...,1,,..1,,,,..4..,,,....1., Renton , Wash, 98055 .. -- ,. .-?.,.:7:-..:,;:,...,.. :!,-_-..., ..I .i)-:-;,'. ;''.. •,.. ,.;-•:„-,„,.-E.- y, ,,,,- .!,-:-.,•,,,-,-y--;;*•!, ,.,.,;,,,:;...-_-•.-?'--,, L. . ..i.:-:,,:.,,:••:•,,I., • : •'. = •• , •,-:,,, ,,..-•:• .14 0'•::. ,,'.'. .:, ,....It'7'.',...... •, .'.',•It..'.. tt. .1...r•... .i.t,..v-....:<,.= ..'..t•-•44...''..'• .. '.th'.,',...' I• '. . , . '•'c- • 1; ' '',..1,-..:'.--..'..,.:.i:,.,..' ',.:.:-",...;.:,:,v.,.,,,....,-.....:;-,3,,,i•,,,,t,,.....-,,..1,-----.'.,,4.,.!-.:-,,:..-:-i'.---;•-. .' :.!,.,'.•. .;,'%,•'‘''c:i•;1' CC Leroy Shearer, SCSI ,'. ,..opoiNarie,,,,.-,,,-..,,,, ,--.:-,1 , ..,,,,, ,.:,.. -- : -.:,.:-:..- -,-ii,..-..„,,,,.,-,..,4.,...,:,..,.....,.., ''• ''''."..''''-.'',..,,, ,I..,..,-,,:-.; ',.•..---,,----',.:',,,A. .,-.:-....,-,,s,'„,•-,;,,,,.A,01.,,.-::-.,..„.;..,-,,....:, ..L,:.,.. ,,..,,,,,.._,..:1,...)Max Fullner, SCSI ,--,, 'Ren o hF0 :, 4 ..,,, - :!.';'.i , , „ , ,,,--: ,44,..J...,,,,,,.:.,..,..,r,„,ig.:L.,-.,vi.,),,,,J,.,:-,...,„ ,:. :r,.-:.Lk , . " • . •:', ‘ - ,',•-•,-.';,.•'..,:i-,-:•f:..,,, ,,,7„:/,,,,'„$,,--.!,;1';!•,t.,04•1",',1".';',4-'':7-',.'§'');:.!•"'-'.'.': '.!?•••A:'''r'',:,'!,' P,;',',:..,',1.,.:'";:l. ,'",e,',.,r;',.,„'.';',,,,t,::..;,...-'.;: .;:,,:,.(1,,,,,.,,T,,,,),--;,`,,:v- ,. . . • , ''..---'-' -.-.''..'-''.:,-.?,,„-..,,,i•.i--', -,,;,•.,',-,,'-.`,-.-....,',.7.,-;.,-;,',,.,,.,:,:'0.-•1:.7!:-,-',,71:.'4,":)k.--;iA,.q;'.).,',-;;;:.,..-,ii:.:,-'4-4.w..,?T•:7;,A'•),:'..k,'a7,:,• :4,:7 N•-,e'''4 "-, ','.;...V.-.;',-•, .(r.!i„::,..,:•,:-•,:,i', .' , 1, . '•'''" *•.-." . :.'. :".: '''''.:**'c'''''''-'!';',.'N: i1.*;:.-•-!'*•':i,':.-..•'.!''*,:•-)Z--:;',:?..:4•Al'4, -:?-1:::•: :'.;,;,;:-....':°' '.... • . '''''4?t,.:''-', ,r,*•••1,.` ., ::* ;'',...f4,.".:,:''- . , • .' '''.'... '.:**-*'''.' '''. •4:;!--;•V'',;:ii•':*•';'.,..'''? ',*';',..'••*!T•,'i.*:'•f',';::'-;*'),•'*."'*:',.:Zd'''3.',,Z,;;!:C:''':...".*:."':;:i'' ,1 :.OE :.jo„ -. I...:-.:,...,..Y,.--.,,::',:, .-P.,,.*:,-;;',.;:r,';' , . ., .--- ,-'....,--_, ,-,;,.:-, ,•-...:,,,,,,..-,,..,,..,.- . ..,-;,..., .',..---,,r, P,,.,:,.-,,z t , , , . ; ,,,,,,,..•.,, ... : , .,,:.:,-,•: ,,.,,,,,,,„4,....,,;,:::„...4.;.y.,,,,,,,,,,,,...,..,,4,,,i-r„--:,,-34,:ft--;:v...- " '•'','' . 0,,,..:".'7:..,1›:,•..1.1,.H,,-;.,.,.,:n.1.1,,.q-,#,..4.:'' .,..,- t , ,, .'' '' ' .. j":C'',''''''',: '''•:•.'...-:;.:• '..-::."-it';•21:s•:,•:;`•-•;.....:-'-''...':i'....--'i-:',-.::.•?-?','.:-..f•ii.1.,-4.;. . .'"I''-',-,:::,'••,11...[CSP8A r*A '..',1,'';':%=7;'.7-::--- -'..-•;;-•:';'.' -",• ; .....;:•.,'.;., ':.‘i.'....:-,',':'; .:f.".:).5-,,I.t..-' .-,-..;•t;:•'',11.;:i i', =A;,g,ii iir.,:-;'•.,',,.,,-..,,[.,..i;•:,,.i...,,,• . , ,-,...-•,,, ' -,'•• U .•- 0 ......*;'',.-;.:;''.';`:q-;.'1.':::-" i 1 • • • •-.-.• '""';-' 'L.":.'.' ',f':.','''''''••-':.'".',',!'i".'*''..-',. .;,•'r ...,:''.-'''.::-..1:-...4......i,',--''.'-.:, :.-. ". ' ..•'- 2'--.. ' ., p-5, ,`,,..1',".,',:';',:!',..;;,.,i.',-:.. , .• ' ... '. -: ..': -' ''-,,''''-'.-,, '..,:'!''..'';'.:;';....,:,7';''...".. ',',-..,-,-.., 6',.....'"--If?7;7,:::',;: :":1'...' .!..' s'..Urr•.r •:,,-.,'-• :-• , ':- orr, "',••••''• -•• -',•-:..-. I - • ,,• , '', ,',. ..!2,,,-...',' :'•'-,,•,:•1.,::-.S.:-.,,...,.1-44•; 53 . ----,•,,;t.,1t...-kff ' -'':.;'.' -"1 •--1._17,'/siA-.1"-.• -,'.','--'. r•+•-•.-..'.., ;•'.''''. . , ' ',•: ;•.•'-'2:',':•..,;.':", ..,''''', i'-','',-,,i-:r''';1%'s:n7i''','",,"::::.::;;:ii:%"-T,:.; :e:,;71.5 r1-....7,:, 713''..t'',', •:,,'t,_,,,... -..,,..,- ,,,f 7 7-1-,:.. ;-;.-;‘•''--:t';,,-,;•1-;t,'•''' •-''-. - ,- .' '-'• •' `''.'":'''' '...',--"..:'.`':'''t'''1.'..''::.!...1•T. 15.5':.....-:,:,;1:;,..,..ie.4:4.1/. .!,,,:','4,t.:_ r T•, . ,-,:::,..„:.,•-:,.:-.,.;........,.. .-,...0.,,-,,...,.,-..-,. ..t;•,,!.,,F., ::,, . ... 7.- , ......,'-:- -...tr..2.::: :.-1-i. :,-;.,.7.T.k.'-vAT,':*.A."-;*,'.',",-;'Al '• -•;:,c;4.4.'ti,- -.'.7'',...,:- .; . . - . -..-:::-"- ' • ',...i,,,''-..".:.‘::',-.,-4:;,:,... ; 1 • , , . ,., . .... ,..,..,, • ..„...„:;..i,i.,..-..t,,,,',/,',r-;/..r. ,,,,IP:,,,;i..,.--;.-.:-.,:r-,--.-.‘.•.....,":,•.,-.Z"P,;:!?3'''.,-..- '• 1:1;f ,',2'...;.1.;!.''..1;•,-,f.;;..?..:',-,-_',4•C ';,,,,':j.;:-.,.':M;1`-':',.!:6-f4":'''. .- ,, . .,‘„ ,•f..-- ...--.?•...;p:i...,......:.--,3z•--Of ..''2,1.1‘'''..4,4',..,,,,,::::,tii,.....i.r 1 • '. ••.:'- •. '4.r' . '`'' 4-4,'''''.;',•,,,,.'.:.j:•,_. ..;;;,,,,,,241.4r;,;(;:,.,. ...'y''',:41;1.4,L4.. .'.;7-:-','••• , 414.."-•:7:'.7."..-.C.'fifr''''....XC' TIt'7::.:•71-7:77•C''''777 is''.. ' . • . _ ', '::_, ; '''...'':•••,'..,...•"•:,...:!:',.;•;::::'Ll,: -:••.7,;:•:,,,,"-:.'>'•':;:v..7:4-,',.4:.!;( :';'41;,'.;11''''''::•;';'Aiti''''i;':1•'-f'.". .-.'. ' •c..1''''''ri,-;...'R''''olv' ,,,.1'."':','';',7...;•.,,..!!;.,".*• ,:',L'w,:i„::;t-,..,...';i 1 , 1 - . • ."7' :.:"'" ,.:.... . ,:-',.... ,..,-......•'...•.:v•":,;74Nt•-•;147,M•',V,r:l.'i4.:,,',1.:'',;s1:' ,'..t‘......,1'4.41 7', ''''.!''..• .t.rro, .,..,;A..,:,..',..,....'„;,':;:,;.,,,:.::,.:.,:,..,.y.,,,,,,._t'.',;,..1: - ,., ,,,,. -''".,..2,.. V'i,e.•:,•,,,...4 •,,,',..4.,•,,.6Li.-',:..4;.".i...,:Pt 4r;4'&;),-'i.-4,r,4-•r---r. ..er ' '• ! • ''.' . . . *'.. * 1 -'-'* '**J''''*:**;:'7•-,"'7e:.'""'''''' .''Kr''.'••"{'''''i`'' '';'),^6: ':-,•.i-,,:::-e4 W..,.•11.'',t'4.-•:t.'1„.• •••.:,.•, „ . -,-. ;-„,',..,,'.,::,•,,!,;,,'-^.(,;.7,'Y..1.','.. .',Y,...,f-*.!...,'F,.. r. . • '., -,..''•'.*::•:.* ;'..:L-. •';•:.''.'.l.-• .Zq...:'',..i'*•'...,*';:2•1;11 .;, ,,,.„.`-', :•,:,. .1.. ,:..,,44-,,.,'44,.., .,:;• '; -,, ••:•:i ----: ';-:''.!:•,-.,'.;:":-.;' -.Y.!,:.'',...4' .!:'...'•.;•2...:Tt4.;..';'..'-'!.,.„.:,..:;.);',.;. 1 , • ';'..' ,.'7".. .r•Ti:- , •i,,, .,-;,,,.A‘'..,-;',•:1•:..,*V-i.,',..;-•,.-4 4 ..''',•lif.',•,j„!.Z,,,...:',4,•.,',.4-, •4,-.7..-;.,g.•''':'..F.:.4 / ' •: . . • • ' • . . -,',-^ ',2::-'`-‘'...i',‘,;•:,•4,.. .• t'S'•'''..•4....".....'3.;;;.j':•'..P.'.1.•:',;.,' .2,...,-,;1/4 ,4-";....4,--,,,,,,,,..=I.-,-'',..1.--.'..;•---.g.'.1;,,,,,.;•,'",'..t• '. .';',...•;.1.:.; ', .,- -..,..:- ..,_-,,;..;.,...,,44,-.,..c.,4,.","-. f;-...:..,:•.....,,,,..--.•--;.",.,;,;"...-2,-,..;,,i,-.,...(,..,,,-,,,..-,-, ;71,1-,,,-.•;.;.,..:,;__,l',,,4,;; '„I,a-..,...,,;,..,:4, ;'-....4,,Ji:.'...le.t..1:- • i ' '`.,',"_ I•,...''..,.q:,r, ,,,,,. p,•;.--,F-•,:-",:i :,.',•:••••±.',--:,-a,t-;`.,,,,•'.;.:',.,..,,,,,,./.,,n',11.....,.:,V,,.,;.',.-*.,:,t;i,7r.'1,".''''''.'.''.:.• ,..-.f.2. -,--'-.,..,..-,..•.;,'-'•'-'..;•"i0 i•':'.. ' .: '. '.• .:•.:...'"'i4' '•'..-'•'‘.•.'4 '''''f '':'.r .''''' 3..q.1•'.:-4 ,•.'''f''!:!...','-.^..fi'1,4, .r....,1H,.:...-1:'-.7..'...:,.:•;'-','.'..• :f.`i-r-1.3:.'7'''Lei' $'.;1;;•..."4..::,t2• '41.7'•••'.,..:Y,'''',,,` ,,;;;).-; 4„,:•••,: i ' ' .; " ...,',.. i•',; •';:;-•',.,•-'..",'•:''......,.;.-..4;';,,.•:.-,-',.....,..-...,..,''.:''::•-.:,'.,-,:v,:,.,,..,,--,0',..'%....1.,,.,,•':', ;!•_;?.'.,/,•.':-•,.';_ ''.,:./..:•,*:4-'.•':,'',:,...•I.J.:.„*r'',.?,';'.,.QV;:;.,-;;Ii4,' ''-•'•.t.,:•.:•', ;,`•••'Z,'•'i.,-;"•,:•1.1:...'. — . . .. "' .;..'';:, • ,.. ..':':-"-',•:.. .1.•'':_' *-‘'•;,: :-;. . . ,",.;,;..));-23.;::1%?,,,L.C•.:.:;;7:.,,,,V4:-.:,-:*;:::ii!•.;';'":-... :11.(,, " ..4, --',.4.,•;!-:-..i.j.'-54'•* M'',?, .-',•1-':.',*',:'•-,...7'i..';''''VJZ,:•g':.,= .1Ye::':''.?,.'!' `'..1'!'.r''•.'''f.!:47-%•'-''.iilLt:'*- .., ,.; ,.„ . ,„..,,,.,.......,...;,..,:,:••,;•-.;:.;,•.-..-:,.'.•,,,,,:,-, <,...r..-.-,--.....;--.•,,,,...-,:-.4,..1..c:01.,i>ri,i,-:;;;._ .':•?::;•-;.....,;-',.!,•,..,,.. ;'.'.':2:: ,!. .:-; i - • :- ,'.. .,' . .•.: .---” ,'•-'7•7,. ;:-.•' .:":',',: , , ,'",•-•i';'•••- ...:4:A.:.:'. .',, !,.,'‘:,;-••c;•,.c.-!.;, -“,:-..-;•,".... ',.1.',;,-1?),....2::;:f.',.. ,': , . • • ' - - , - ,• .441-•-"--- ..--,,,,,,.-4,,,,,'tj'• 'i;--', 'J ..5%•.,:1•••,.....•- , :,..,,.,1,if„f:.,...„: ".:'.,1 ,`....' ';•-,'-','.. -.•' .'''.7:'-': '' - ••- . ' .-•r"'.• ''.• ; '..-?,'• '''': '''. ''-', • •''' ' ''1•--•''' 1;4..• 1,.' '4•"•:',t,f;'i,LY••,::•.,•".;,:”.:ii‘I,...:.&,".',..Y.', . .• . ••••,..!•;f-..:,' !.. ',..`":,,r,,, / .i • , , , . ;• ...I .;-„;,:-.1 . ,,,'.•...;,:'...•,•,-.'$-2:•';"'4.':.'',•4_ ;•,2•,',-' ''' :.- ".'1 i,b: -. .11',...- kn-j-; 'A.,j.;:,,,.,..t:'4,,-:,,r,'., 4..r•,;:.j...f ;.,;-' • ,' ,.., '.,...,,•';-4'is,'•'-,;Y.:7'4::r."-•-•' .' it-„ ...'4".I "v-z'•?`. ',.'..-. . v.'•:•.'-, '_•:•":2, '' '• .. '' 'r',. '''...:7..';...." " '''`.‹1..-;"f:f "4:_•.;;;',.. 3 '''';'....',,. .•.'".. .-i,:ri ;..4:''iy:;•t?.;,',r'.4"..,'.;','';''',.::'wkY,:t.:, ..:`,,Itf•I''''.5;2,-.:'.,1`1".;-`:.,...t T':--.,',••.t:!;',1",:'..:t•.'.',.".',..::',,,,':.,c',..'','',.„,, l' , ,• , ,, .. ,,,,...„,,,,,,,..,,,,i,,,,-,,,'....,..1., •,....,;,,..:•:, ,.V; ,,,,c4...:,,;;,,c...,",",,1-1_,-,;.;,...T:.„,.4,„,74.44,,...,F,,-,f' 1.r,,r,',‘,.,:;,',,/,j,";;,...,,,9.',..„:„,,v..,...„.,,..,,,,,,,,„.,..,...4:,•4.,.44,-1•••„4 4:;,:.`,.:;,..,•,'.".":/?A','1,.:::,'..4.:':-: . • . n . '• ...-1,4.,:.,,',,.',^ ,',f..- ',. ,:,.:!r‘'.,,..&',..,, •',.,„,..c,...,,r,,,,:„,,5,,;!..;cr.„..,,,• ....?, 5,, .,-,i;,,,, :'.:...,'!':474;:',,',.1,'!„,',:,;11,,,,,,,;''..,y;':',,'4'.'`,,..':/4;',‘.'.'1;; ;.:.'4-1..‘45,',',.:--','•:Z'Z,'....',';',',,l'',',LLi'.••;?i 1 --- •,',' 1:',,,„': ,; ;•: ,. ,.,0,:-;,,;i,,,,,.;,._•;,,)i.,:,,„:,A4_,,.4..,,?if4,,gc,,.-,Z,41.7.,,i.., ,,,,,,,',,i.-:•,,,=,,.,..,4„,,,,,, c,,,!,,f,, ,wif: ,: ,,,-,4,1.,_,,,, ••••,, ,c,V .'..•!,•,:irii-,•.;• •W-4'is,'.,"",':i".•.`-';',.:•°g:.-',".‹)•-"?,•:.i.. •./. ' ' ,.'' , - •.•'•- ,.." '.•''''' "..t7-,,.1"•,--'''''," ',.`•-','',i"•-•:.).',I.7r2.4r.''','''''''••-•;:if-,‘,. . ,-it,r4-4:,, 4,.:4,:,--4, .-•"!t-`4•.../4:..':,i'a';',Z,..:i.''....:,..1', ..•':',.t,'-'••,,..„.+7,,"4,:,,,'ri.';-,..,..,.:''.;:!i:,77;;'. • • ,' „:., -: ....'4,14'....• 7.., . '',,',','''':-f','.,,:',; Ii',,,,,;' ;,L',V ',,, ,, . 4,"''',7,1,''4,e1;,,,Z":•-•'-',F.:!;1,:Q..,M;;: ''..,,:',:;,..,..,,,.:'.:. .-..•::•,., ,..-',' ' .."'':it,....,';',. .,'1-..,,4•V-4.,,'.•-.. 0 4:t;vt,•‘-,.., ,i-,',!...i,4,.,04.'',7h,!:',,,•14,66,,'Pl,t;‘,',Ve.,,,;,..',..I.,• ..,;,„-.:',,f.;.,1.,T,,,-.,....;..',....,r,',...,i,..4,• , i1, ' ' . •• ,•' . ,..,, •- '1'', .''...,1•,•" .''t''....-. ",-.--`'il7;•-! '•,•• ''- "'4-- .4'...:4.1.-•.•,.'.4,!‘...',:•-••••'"''','-i'.'•:','!'::::'•'''''''''".:•:.:44'44..7%-,:;.•'..r:';-r4,;:i.--,...".1.--74,.4 "2.,4,-' ''''' •-,,i•-, !'•..-"Ot.''A','.•;•i ,. . ,, ',....1 '..• ,fr.;',:.,•..:•,;;•,,,!,:•.,.; •.:••'••.;;ii•-•,:',•t ••. ,, :.:•7',.'^„.,1;-').,'\::'• ,'.'Z',.,1 ''',11:....v..k:X.$1'' "'•• '... ','!`.;:;;•t.f" ;.., l•••••;?i,`••Af0•,; . i•.' ' 1, • ' • %•'•••'`'''..'..J.N`-•: ' '- • . . '' ' '4 ,...*•••••••Y^.E,'.'Y..,;•;',''',', :.,'.':,••!2.'',"A.•'":.;:1",:v ,,,,,,,,,.,. ,-J-,-,,,,,i,,..;0,,..:.A.•1.,.:..'r- :,•,i ,...*-.„,.!„•,,,::;,•••:!J,• ;,.,t.;,,,:t1,1 .,,, '.I. .:.. .,..........,..•. • •''•• ; „ ; I' , , , ' , • ' , ''," - THE CITY OF RENTON: 2 . -fp4,4", '!" : ,• MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 08055, -; • ; 0 " . AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR ISLPLANNING DEPARTMENT 235. - 2550 OSEp1 • 3 . October„,:17 ' •F••••• , ,, • ,.• MEMORANDUM TO Files FROi4.:,f:• Gary R . Kruger , Associate Planner , Joan A . Lankford , Assistant ',Planner RE :1 :2 ! 'Soil Conservation Service W-ildTife, Mitigation Areas Leroi: Shearer , ' Soil Conservation:' Service , Spokane , phoned in response,- • : to ItHe :Planning Commission 'Comprehensive Plan. Committee ' s : inquiry Of :substituting another mitigation wetland;.•: type III 'area, in place of Ithe : Scarsel l a, wetland type , III area . '•, " „ . It wa.'s the Comprehensive Plan Committee ' s opinion at the October 2 , :1g:74 :meeting , that: this area would be in, addition :to the two percent, requirement. • , Mr .-, Shearer indicated that he would, field check thearea south of the Shell property and would submit a report on the site abOut, the'ir•r• third 'week in November . If information is needed prior to ' • the earliest that he could possibly provide it if-would be •:,NoVember. . . .' - four-eh or fifth,' In the meantime , Max Fulner or William Gokely could •'•:••,`,,: ••, be ,licontacted for information . : . • • lr ' H ;,, Mr.i Shearer indicated verbally ,: at; this time , that he ' had tibn8 ,to a trade-off . However , he.i also indicated that those areas . •• designated as type III wetlands did have value and that in addition ,„', ,';• ••' there were many valuable areas in the Renton Val ley jurisdiction that „ had not been indicated by: Soil .Conservation Service because the Renton CoMprehensive Plan designation, at . that time had ,shown heavy and light industrial uses . ; " ' ' 33 Since there. are culverts under SR-167 -, Mr . Shearer stated that a •• • water level control structure would: be needed in 'order :to: maintain, ' the water level -in adjacent wetlands , especially the', area east of SR4167 . - • r, • GRk: JAL :illS CC ' Don Humble , Chairman , 3 • „ ••• r", •• • 1 Comprehensive Plan Committee I •,," ;•• I,- J Patricia Seymour , Member „ I: Clark Teegarden , Member • • : ' '• - ' , ; ,,'• ' Page 10 Record-Chronicle Thursday, October 10, 1974 ' , - -. g. , _-. i. r ' Sca rsella 's pondwortso . 1 is ni - Renton Planning Director Dr. Thomas W. Mitchell, a 'ponding area for wildfowl be public is questionable," the ickefi s�,I request might be Gordon Y. Ericksen says he's Seattle dentist,have suggested created in conjunction with the planner says. "There would be granted: not so sure a three acre pond the pond be retained as a wild Green River drainage system'a problem with;access, and "The service's; posi- near Qrillia is worth saving. life preserve for ducks and south of Longacres and the there's industry all around it" tion...has been that 'if a city The:fate of the pond,which other birds. Shell Oil property. Part of-t ee Ericksen says he, plans to does not want to preserve,cer- is owned by general contractor Planning Director Ericksen pond would be within the;City ask ,the• Soil Conservation tarn' areas, they should come Tony Scarsella, has been be. decided to require an environ- of. Tukwila. Service to reconsider its desig= up with substitute areas,"_he, fore ±'the Renton Planning mental impact statement on ,, nation of-,the"pond as a wet- says. It could be created‘along, land that might be worth res - "We'll have''to..talk with Commission since March. the proposed landfill last July. with the,channel there,"' Er- p Scarsella has applied for a' Now he says he has his doubts .• erv'ng. The'SCS has designat Mr.Ericksen about this." permit to fill the pond. He about the pond's value. . . could says. "That way you eel II0 acres of wetlands in the A footnote:.'the:con±t>over. says he wants' •to move his • "Personally; .I. feel it's aould eontrol the water level Green River Valley for conser sial pond;has dried : cor.,truction business from questionable whether it's an•d everything. • vation. ' :' the.propos • ed'landfill g 1-r'. ' Pacific Highway South to the worth saving,". he'.says. "I ,Ericksen says there are Max. Fullner, district con- before the planning.nntfs- new site, on the .West,Valley think a larger area might be other problems with presery servationist for t}ae SCS; isn't sion. Scarsella'says'ft- uppens Highway. '• ' of more value to wildlife." ' ing Scarsella's pond besides ruling out the possibility Er- every year; '' '' 13ut-there's a catch — the As an alternative, Ericksen size.' _..�---- -- Soil Conservation Service and has suggested a 20-3 acre '"Its value to the general l g � - �7 ` 'I,t i ,/�t:F* '1Fw .fi x ,,� ^� 4 ( e a a , y�� Yf�,$, set �r r �„ - s r x .,r r °� '"� �IT o, 3g #4 em Pta F;,p„; ... ,i,,, Lb a ft5r�' �, a _a+ e > rs 2.e. rn„ ,t��' , t ,f it i " k,,d-fir. ,yb%:, Sr .' _"4"ii- ""£s a.,<�6�r -•, , .ea a:',+C.s . ✓.: r : c - ' 1•* ,.Y3 E sea4 � ` ` fi *' ^�"n,' O i1 ` ; f�� r ` ., ; key.„,,t ^ la ,, i S t ? s � i.•t (` - .' 'Y a , f , f t r v!„,„a,red r1 r *� ' ' 5 �s' :, , ,p. '. 0 i2 k. '` � '.♦ ,'."� 'd$sp. ix,°nx 'n 7 . x 7: ,� : .:ar�Yi�6 At ,)e ` r , '# s ` «+w �' iy,�s�rS '. > • " SCARSELLA'S POND Right now it's dry. Is it worth saving? 4OF -v 41 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON �� �' MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • XXXX COC 9 0 235-2550 OR?CAPITAL Of September 27 , 1974 Alan F. Austin Montgomery, Purdue, Blankenship and Austin 1515 Norton Building Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: SCARSELLA BROTHERS Special Permit for Fill and Grade (File No. SP-760-74) and Related Environmental Impact Review Process Dear Mr. Austin: Pursuant to our telephone conversation on September 25, 1974 , we understand that the detailed draft environ- mental ,assessment which you are preparing is near com- pletion and will be submitted to this department in approximately ten days. We are hoping to receive this information shortly so that the Environmental Impact Statement process can pro- ceed and thus expedite a determination of environmental significance. This information was presented to the Planning Commis- sion, which will make its decision on Mr. Scarsella' s proposal upon completion of this environmental review process. We have not received the requested information from Soil Conservation Service referred to in our September 25, 1974 , telephone conversation. However, when we receive it, we will notify you. Attached are the Planning Commission minutes that you wished to attain. If you need any more assistance or have any questions , please contact this department. • Very truly your , Michael L. Smith Assistant Planner cc: Anthony Scarsella Chairman, Planning Commission ir , . : , ,___ _,, _ , , k , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE , SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE Y 10-2-74 . } •Ms . Joan Langford Renton Planning Dept.. Renton City Hall ,� 200 Mill S . . Renton , Washington 98055 The enclosed letter from Leroy Shearer refers to the Scarzella wetland. ' Don ' t worry about the fact that he says it is a type 4 - ' and our maps shows type 3 because it has some of the characteristics of both . Normally type 4 is deeper than type 3 in the rainy season and there are minor differences in vegetation . The area could be improved by knocking down some of the trees and making more open water and is highly desirable • for preservation of wildlife that uses wet habitat. , X W. L. Cokeley • Soil Conservat ' on Service 232 Main Ave . o . . .. Renton , Wash. 98055 ,, F. cc : Leroy Shearer, SCS , Spokane • Max Fullner, SCS , Renton FO lerIPEA/1/ OFRF -o CT 4 1974 G DEPAO‘I‘ , i o • , , 6 , , . . , . . .. __, , • . • . .. rhea' • 0 ... �i�' TAN' 1: VLTED ST1 ES DEPAME OF' Q.AACULTITE C,', 2 1974 ,�,��r�i (y r .a.M �FriCai,p 1'W `'a¢tm'�t, w..`k'.0•T: --,, i Rii� %��`*' — .' t 4 by.;,V M . '. .7.041 10.K, '� .'t�F-[i�faj7A�;;,.;,;fi,' -'k i+titVel:N WMi1r esk'i,N �5 ttI•h!ffi,,,�1..^V,Oo Y:.r. n w.i..,•, •• Room 30 U.S. Courthouse:, Spokane, Was iingtou .1920 _. • ;ucJJ?CT:i BIOL - Wetland Habital Values DATE: September 27, 1974 • pF Re TO! �� William L. Cokeley RECEIVED 2 �. Project Engineer V 1 Soil Conservation Service OCT 4 1974 Renton, Washington • • . J Qd l• up on our telephone conversation today I ike to put doa. A/p� e l OliOw"�nc a few' points on the value and use made of wetlands by ducks, in NG DEpP • • particular the wet area north of 180th and east of the West Valley Highway. . We typed this area as Type 4'.due to the depth and permanency of the .. water as well as the vegetation. A Type 4 can, and does, go dry at ' times, particularly during periods of long dry spells. I think we can agree that this summer. and fall has been such a period. At first, this may seem to destroy the value of the area for ducks. Not so, in all cases! -While it is true that we would prefer a permanent, . , year-round water area; such areas soon lose all their value as they • become overgrown and choked with vegetation such as cattails, bulrushes ' and often willow. Thus, it becomes necessary to clear out such vegeta- i tion to retain open water and cover in 'proper proportions. Periodic . drying of the area, and even agricultural••activities during these dry periods, has the beneficial effect of setting back the vegetation to . something less that-a choked condition when it next fills up--thereby • benefiting the ducks. . 0 In most cases,. wetlands of. this type are used both by breeding ducks, and later as areas to raise the broods. Drying up of a Type 4 is most often late enough in the season so that the broods are flighted and can fly to larger bodies of water still existing. • Another fringe benefit of lowering the water level and even drying up • wetlands, is the change in conditions that allows new plants to germinate. Plants such as smartweed are common under these conditions. Seeds of cmartilced are high quality duck food and are eagerly sought when the wet area fills up. In summary, the drying up of wetlands is not a disaster to ducks; it's • a natural periodic occurance. In most cases the value of the area has been realized--the hatching and rearing of a brood or broods of ducks. • ��, �r . Le 6y A. She • General Biologist • IT 4pF 'V a C.) w ,z PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASII.INGTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • XXXXIKOC 9 235-2550 9ySAORT CAP17Al OF��4 September 27, 1974 Alan F. Austin Montgomery, Purdue, Blankenship and Austin 1515 Norton Building Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: SCARSELLA BROTHERS Special Permit for Fill and Grade (File No. SP-760-74) and Related Environmental Impact Review Process Dear Mr. Austin: Pursuant to our telephone conversation on September 25, 1974 , we understand that the detailed draft environ- mental assessment which you are preparing is near com- pletion and will be submitted to this department in approximately ten days. We are hoping to receive this information shortly so that the Environmental Impact Statement process can pro- -ceed and thus expedite a determination of environmental significance. This information was presented to the Planning Commis- sion, which will make its decision on Mr. Scarsella' s , proposal upon completion of this environmental review process. We have not received the requested information from Soil Conservation Service referred to in our September 25, 1974 , telephone conversation. However, when we receive it, we will notify you. Attached are the Planning Commission minutes that you wished to attain. If you need any more assistance or have any questions , please contact this department. • Very truly your , /64 Michael L. Smith Assistant Planner cc: Anthony Scarsella Chairman, Planning Commission I - 11, ?> U' THE CITY OF RENTON z �# MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 '1 AVERYGARRETT,MAYOR • :_P-E-ANNING DEPARTMENT � <t, 235 - 2550 ,P4fO SEP�c_At$ MEMORANDUM September 25 , 1974 TO : Planning Commission FROM: Michael Smith , Assistant Planner RE : Scarsella Environmental Impact Statement We have yet to receive additional- input in the form of a detailed environmental assessment from the applicant. This information will be utilized in formulating the draft. Environmental Impact State- ment. We have written the applicant ' s attorney and requested a status report on this assessment . We have not to date received a reply. We have also written the Soil Conservation Service to receive their opinion as to the environmental significance of the proposed action . They have indicated that they will supply us shortly with ' such information . . MLS :wr i • I . Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 25 , 1974 Page Fourteen information to be submitted shortly. Review by the Soil Conservation Service has been requested . The Com- mission will be advised , when the EIS is completed. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE Commissioner Scholes , Chairman of 'the Community Services Committee , announced a meeting at 7 : 30 p .m. , October 2 , regarding outstanding referral items . In view of the late hour, it was MOVED BY SCHOLES , SECONDED BY HUMBLE , THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS BE CONTINUED TO THE OCTOBER 9 AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. As there was no further business before the Commission , it was MOVED BY HUMBLE , SECONDED BY . MOLA, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting was adjourned at 1 :00 a .m. 7 '''..--7).-- - , , 1 /7 v Larry Gi bso , gecre^ y d �f Norman Ross , Chairman .Sea rs •t/,(.t. Renton Planning Commission Meeting September 25 , 1974 Page Thirteen minimal environmental impact , including no visual impact . He also noted plans to place tanks on a site previously approved for such usage . Teresa McKay , 7800 S . 130th , Seattle , inquired as to how the propane gas would be delivered to the facility. Mr . Hogland responded that it would be delivered by tank trucks . Respond- ing to Mrs . McKay , Mr. Hogland stated that it will require about sixty tank truckloads to fill the station and that operation should be accomplished within a • thirty to forty day period . He stated that they hope to never have to fill it again but weather is unpredictable . The present facility has been used only once since its construction . ,. Mr. McKay, 7800 S . 130th , Seattle , asked if in the last ten years there had been any instances of fire . Mr. Hogland responded there had been none . Responding again to Mr. McKay, Mr. Hogland indicated that tanks are loaded with a pressure piping connection into the tank loading facil - ity pump and moves the product into the tanks internally , and there would be no vapor emissions . Mr. McKay inquired if the area is on an earthquake fault. Mr. Ericksen advised that there are fault lines along the westerly slope of Talbot Hill and noted that the entire Puget Sound Basin is subject to earthquakes and the whole area does have conditions that result in earth movement under certain circumstances . Mr. Hogland stated that the design takes into consideration earthquake faults . Responding to Mr. McKay, Mr. Hogland indicated soil in the area is glacial till and provides a solid foundation . Grover Shegrud , 18216 - 196th Ave . S . , Renton , noting that the facility has some danger potential , pointed out that it is located in the vicinity of several schools . He questioned if it was reasonable to expand an operation of this type at this time and suggested continuance to allow public input . Mr. Hogland stated that safety was a factor , when considering any form of energy , and noted approximately twenty schools in the area that have tankage of this size and capacity above ground within fifty feet of their buildings . Discussion among the Commissioners followed regarding the questions that had been raised and time required to resolve them. ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY SCHOLES, THAT THE WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY APPLICATIONS FOR SITE (USE) APPROVAL AND SPECIAL PERMIT BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE OCTOBER 9, 1974, PLAN- NING COMMISSION MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. 5• ADMINISTRATIVE: T SCARSELLA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, Commissioner Mola requested a status report , noting that the pond on the Scarsella site is completely dried up . The Planning Director advised that the staff had been in con- tact with Mr. Scarsella and his representatives , regarding preparation of the EIS , and the staff is expecting additional OF 'V �► O (3ti �� y�_ ,Z PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • 3IXXXXg ° 235-2550 'ysAORT CA PITM• September 23 , 1974 • Soil Conservation Service 35 S. Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: William Cokely RE: Wetland Area III Located along West Valley Road on Property Owned by Scarsella Dear Mr. Cokely: • Upon inspection of the above mentioned property on September 20, 1974, this is to advise you that this ponding area has dried up. Would you please provide us with a current evaluation of this wetland area under its current condition and as to the importance of including this portion of wildlife/wetland habitat within the City of Renton' s Mitigation Area. As you are aware, Mr. Scarsella has a proposal pending through the Planning Commission to fill this site. Under the current circumstances, we request your department to establish the value of this area and respond to the impact that filling and elimina- tion of this area for protection of wildlife would have upon the Valley. We would appreciate your response' as soon as possible, in order to assist the Planning Commission in their review of the pending fill and grading of the site. Thank you for your assistance® Very truly yours, Joan A. Lankford Assistant Planner, Landscape Design U OHO ' 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON, WASHINGTON ti, MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • XIXXX 1 �0 235-2550 s„, CA PITA-Of,a� September 19, 1974 • Mr. Alan F. Austin Montgomery, Purdue, Blankenship and Austin 1515 Norton Building Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: Environmental Impact Statement Scarsella Special Permit for Fill and Grade Dear Mr. Austin: As per our last correspondence, you were in the process of preparing the subject E.I.S. This matter was also referred to the Community Services Committee of the Planning Commission for their review. We would appreciate an indication from you as to the status of this report. If you have any problems or further questions, please contact this department. ye y truly yours , ry Mic ael L. Smith Assistant Planner ti OC Uti 4.0 © PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON = o MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • 43W9'�OX 235-2550 OQT CAPIT- 04 July 23 , 1974 • Mr. Alan F. Austin Montgomery, Purdue , Blankenship & Austin 1515 Norton Building Seattle , Washington 98104 Dear Mr. Austin : As per you request, I am sending you a copy of Mr. Scarsella ' s Shoreline Management Applica- tion for fill and grading. If we can be of further assistance , please contact the Planning Department. Very truly yours , Joan A. Lankford , Assistant Planner Landscape Designer •1 Enclosures JAL/kh • • • see c?fe, OFR� 7, PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON ummiR 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98055 • 235-2550 44T�DSE���� MEMORANDUM • July 19 , 1974 • TO : Files • FROM': Joan A. Lankford RE : Scarsella Fill Permit I talked with Mr. Eubanks , today and . he advised me that Mr. Scarsella is not planning an addition- al fill for the existing filled area on the site. He will be submitting a site plan under M-P zoning to the Planning Commission meeting Septem- ber 11., 1974. I advised him that the submittal date was September 4 , 1974 . Mr. Scarsella still plans to proceed with his application for fill of the ponding area , subject to approval of the Environmental Impact Statement and Shoreline Management Application and Special Permit for - Fill . • • • • pF R •v ti �� „gai PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • 235-2550 .4+� , ysOOgT CA PITAt•0� J July 19 , 1974 Mr. Alan F . Austin • Montgomery , Purdue , Blankenship & Austin 1515 Norton Building Seattle , Washington 98104 RE : Scarsella property on West Valley Highway Dear Mr. Austin : Pursuant to our conversation with you and Mr. Ericksen on July 15 , ,1974, the following items and schedules were dis- cussed: 1 . It appears feasible that the office , warehouse and storage yard could be relocated on the exist- , ing fill area and a revised site plan under M-P zoning should be submitted to the Planning Department by September 4, 1974 to be first heard at the Administrative meeting September 11 , 1974 (no meetings are held the month of August) . I was advised by Mr. Eubanks today that Mr. Scarsella plans to proceed on the above item and will not need fill material in excess of 500 cubic yards to finish grade the existing filled area . Mr. Scarsella still plans on proceeding with his appli- cation . for fill of the remaining site. , 2 . Planning Commission action on the Special Permit for fill and grading will occur after th.e 'approval of the Final Environmental Impact Statement by the Planning Department . Procedures for submitting the Environmental Impact Statement 'are' as follows : a) SDbm,i:t ,;information for Draft Impact Statement in suitable form as prescribed by state guide- lines to the Planning Department for review and acceptance. b) Provide copies addressed envelopes) and postage for mail distribution of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. This department will advise you of_ the quantity needed at a later date . , c) After the Planning Department has received comments from the recipients , these will be Mr. Alan F . Austin July 19 , 1974 Page Two submitted to you for incorporation in the final impact statement along with any other suggestions that should be included. d) Prepare final' impact statement as approved by this Department for distribution as above in number two . e) After distribution of the final EIS , the Plan- ning Department prepares a staff recommendation to the Planning . Commission regarding the Special Permit for filling and grading . f) I am forwarding the information you requested on soil vegetations , wildlife and air quality` 3 . Since the original Shoreline Application was for fill and- grading only , Mr. Scarsella will need to make a sep- arate Shoreline Application for approval of his develop- ment plans on the site . I am enclosing copies of: a) "Outline of Permit Procedures" b) Ownership Affidavit c) Application Instructions d) Application - Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit If you have any further questions , please contact us for further assistance. Very truly yours , Joan A. Lankford Assistant Planner Landscape .Designer Enclosures JAL/kh i ' s 0.4R () PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON, WASHINGTON gg �i o � MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • 235-2550 °grtDSErcot% MEMORANDUM July 15 , 1974 TO : Files FROM: Joan Lankford , • Assistant Planner/Landscape Designer RE : Scarsella Environmental Assessment - Reasons for further Investigation Further Analysis needed - Existing ' Conditions : City provided additional input on ; Soil Conditions - King County Wildlife : Soil Conservation Service & David Caster Vegetation - Soil Conservation Service Air and Noise Information data - ' Wilsey & Ham Report Require the .following : A . Hydrology Report - 1 ) Where does water come from? 2 ) Run-off coefficient? 3 ) Depth of pond year round - documental ? 4) Seepage pattern - site and river? 5 ) Specifiy controls for surface run-off, especially into river and ponding. areas? 6 ) Displacement of ponding area capacity -runn-off to the south and east . 7 ) Do we need oil /water separator for parking lot and storage yards? Files July 15 , 1974 Page Two B . Information on Displacement of WilfPlife Habitat - Mitigation procedures ; 1 ) Additional landscape resources 2 ) Contributions to other areas , if this area is to be filled 3 ) Additional information from S . C . S . regarding • the uniqueness of this site 4 ) Public access to pond area C . Alternatives : 1 ) Build on existing filled area . 2 ) Partial Fill . 3 ) No action at all . 4) Is need for rail access necessary for repair of construction equipment . "Major Action" Determination : 1 . First agency responsible for making considerations . 2 . Could cause controversy from citizen groups or adjacent property owners - a ) Loss of ponding area for wildlife habitat . b) Shifting of water ponding to adjacent property . 3 . Action could be minor , but constitute a major action by causing all properties along the area to fill . 4. Precedent could be established regarding attitude toward preservation of wetlands and general filling without consideration of enviornmental consequences . Determination of Environmental Effects : ' 1 . Physical and Biological conditions would be eliminated . One of the few ponding areas would be destroyed . a) Other ponding areas are located in the Green River Valley - yet S . C . S . has designated this one Files July 15 , 1974 Page Three as a typical wetland Habitat III that should be considered for preservation . b) Once the ponding area is filled it would be permanent . 2 . If this ponding area were eliminated , it could be insignificant , but if the same attitude towards all ponding areas was used - it could be possible that all ponding areas would be displaced and could jeopardize The S . C . S ' s . commitment to build the drainage channels . 3 . Existing vegetation could be re-established , but the ponding area would be lost . 4. Consider joint cooperation in developing Environmental Impact Statement with adjacent property owners along the West Valley Highway . Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 10 , 1974 Page Two (2) CITIZENS SERVICE CORPORATION APPLICATION FOR REZONE - IT WAS REQUESTED THAT THE MOTION BY ROSS BE CHANGED TO READ: "MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR, THAT THE COMMISSION CONCUR IN THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO CONTINUE THE REQUEST TO JULY 24, 1974. " It was noted by the Planning Director that the staff recommended concurring in the request of the appli - cant for continuance. .(3) SCARSELLA BROTHERS REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT (FOR FILL) , PAGE FOUR, PARAGRAPH FIVE: "BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE A STATEMENT BY COMMIS- ' SIONER HUMBLE THAT SINCE THE ITEM WAS ALREADY IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE THE MOTION WOULD BE MEANINGLESS. " (4) GARY MERLINO SPECIAL PERMIT. (FOR FILL) : ROSS STATED THAT HE DISSENTED FROM VOTING FOR THE MOTION GRANTING APPROVAL BECAUSE HE FELT ITEM TWO, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE STAFF, WOULD BE MEANINGLESS SINCE ALL 'OF THE PROPERTIES ON / THE OLD EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY WOULD BE EXEMPT FROM THIS SPECIAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS. ACTION: MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY HUMBLE, THAT THE MINUTES OF JUNE 26, 1974, BE AMENDED OR CORRECTED TO INCLUDE COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONER ROSS. MOTION CARRIED. 3- CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS : • SPECIAL PERMIT: Y— A, SCARSELLA BROTHERS , INC. ; Appl . No . SP-760-74 ; special lermit to allow filling and grading in M-P zone ; property ocated approximately 1200 ' north of S . W. 43rd on West Valley Highway. Chairman Teegarden introduced the continued item to the Com- mission and asked the Planning Director for a brief summary .. Noting that the site includes approximately 5 . 8 acres of which approximately three comprise the Soil Conservation Service ponding area , the Planning Director advised that the staff had requested continuance to allow for review of the environmental assessment presented by the applicant and to make a determination whether or not an environmental impact statement would be necessary. A letter in opposition had been received from Thomas W. Mitchell , 3425 S . 176th , Seattle . .. ' The Planning Director read a recommendation from Joan Lankford , Assistant Planner, Landscape Designer, that an environmental impact statement be prepared for the following reasons : . 1 . The impact not only on this property but also adja- cent properties within the City lying within the Interurban Right-of-way and the Green River to the north of S . W. 43rd should be considered on a total basis . ZL'lrsE/Ati RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING JULY 10, 1974 MINUTES COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Humble , Larry Gibson , Anthone Mola , Bev Morrison , Norman Ross , Clark Teegarden , Bylund Wik . COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Arthur Scholes , Patricia Seymour CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen , Planning Director; Michael Smith , Assistant Planner; Warren Gonnason , Public Works Director; Mounir Touma , Public Works Department ; Willis Roberts , Recording Secretary . The July 1974 administrative meeting of the Renton Planning Commission was called to order at 8 : 03 p . m. by Chairman Teegarden . 1 • ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary Wik . All members responded present with the exception of Scholes (out of town ) , Seymour (vacation ) , and Humble (arrived late) . ACTION: MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE ABSENT COMIS- SIONERS BE EXCUSED. MOTION CARRIED. 2- APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Chairman called for additions or corrections to the minutes of the meeting of June 12 , 1974. An amendment regarding Weichmann Enterprise's application for tempor- ary permit was made and withdrawn by Commissioner Ross . The minutes were then declared approved as written . The Chairman called for additions or corrections to the minutes of the meeting of June 26 , 1974 . Commissioner Ross , chairman of the Zoning Committee , requested that the minutes be changed to read as follows : 2.,L (1) SCARSELLA BROTHERS REZONE REQUEST, PAGE TWO, PARAGRAPH FIVE, REGARDING ZONING COMMITTEE REPORT INCLUDE: "REQUEST FOR FILLING AND GRADING WAS DIS- CUSSED. THE SUGGESTED DEVELOPMENT OF A WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ON A PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS DETERMINED TO BE THE PARAMOUNT CONCERN TO BE REVIEWED. THE LOCATION OF A SANCTUARY SHOULD NOT HAVE A MAJOR ARTERIAL HIGHWAY ALONG ONE SIDE AND A MAIN LINE RAILROAD TRACKAGE ON THE OPPO- SITE SIDE. THE SANCTUARY WOULD NOT BENE- FIT FROM THE HIGH COST OF INSTALLED UTILI- TIES AND ACCESS THAT NOW EXIST. THE COMMITTEE FEELS THE SELECTION OF SANCTUARY SITE SHOULD BE THE RESULT OF FINDING THE SITE TO BE MOST REMOTE FROM MAJOR TRAFFIC THOROUGHFARES AND THAT IT SHOULD BE PLANNED INTO A COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD BEST PRESERVE THOSE AMENITIES NEEDED TO NURTURE THE EXISTENCE OF OUR FELLOW CREA- TURES . " Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 10 , 1974 Page Four by other municipalities to the 'westand south . It was noted that development of the Scarsella site can commence while the impact statement is in process and being prepared . The Chairman invited comment from the applicant . Mr. Alan Austin , lawyer representing Scarsella Brothers , stated that Mr. Scarsella wished to fill the property so he can use the entire site and have the availability of the railroad trackage . The smaller site development plan had not been considered , but the matter will be review- ed with Mr. Scarsella ; and an amended plan will be submitted if it is deemed appropriate . The applicant hopes to fill the site during the summer while he has the material and the weather is favorable . He stated that they would cooperate in the preparation of an EIS . Noting the damage occurs when filling a site , Mr. Teegarden said he felt the Commission should seriously consider the implications and investigate alternatives . He then requested comment from the audience but received none . ACTION MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY HUMBLE, THAT ACTION ON THE REQUEST TO FILL BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT IS AVAILABLE . Discussion followed regarding the availability of the EIS in order to give the applicant an indication of Planning Commission action . Noting state requirements , the Planning Director stated that a minimum of three of four months would be necessary before a final EIS could be provided . Commissioner Ross stated he intended to vote against the motion , as he did not consider the request for continuance valid . On the question , MOTION CARRIED, ROSS DESSENTING. 4. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS FOR MEETING OF JULY 24, 1974: The Planning Director reviewed the following new items of business , displayed site and vicinity maps and described filling and landscaping plans where pertinent . It was noted that the Shell Oil Company application for special permit to construct a petroleum marketing plant in H- 1 zone , a continued item, will also be considered . FINAL PLAT APPLICATION A. CRESENT VIEW ADDITION; Appl . FP-770-74 ; applica- tion for final plat approval ; property located on N . E . 16th St. and Kennewick Ave . N . E . The Planning Director noted that this final plat conforms to the preliminary plat plan previously approved and has been constructed in accordance with the Subdivision Ordi - nance . REZONE: B. G.V.R. INC. ;Appl . R-778- 74 ; rezone from G9600 to B- 1 ; property located on Jones Ave . N . E . south of the Pro- duction Co . and Weichmann Enterprises . Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 10 , 1974 Page Three 2 . The filling and development of properties in this area as presently being undertaken on a piecemeal basis could result in significant impact on adjacent properties and possibly place the City in liability if filling and development were not properly conducted due to water displacement and runoff to adjacent properties . 3. The significance of filling the ponding area and its loss as a wildlife habitat is unknown in terms of the immediate and longrange effects . If the ponding area is filled , alternatives should be reviewed and recommendations made to Soil Conservation Service . 4. There is a significant need for a coordinated approach in the development of said property and adjacent areas in terms of a total concept which would meet the requirements of the Soil Conserva- tion Service Green River Drainage Plan. Mr. Ericksen advised that the City Council is considering the adoption of a resolution to concur in the Soil Conser- vation Service proposed Green River Drainage Plan . He stated that in view of the pending adoption of a resolution by City of Renton , the staff felt it was necessary that an EIS be prepared and that all of the questions be addressed . Staff recommendation for partial development of the prop- erty was noted by the Planning Director , who stated that the site included 2 . 3* acres , or 100 ,000± square feet of filled area in the westerly end ( total area 5 . 8 acres less 3 acres of pond and . 5 acre in NE corner) . He described the proposed site development plan , which includes 1500 sq . ft. for the office , 14 , 000 sq . ft. for the warehouse , and 7500 sq . ft . for parking . With 80 ,000 sq . ft. for exterior storage , the area to be developed totals 103 ,000 , sq . ft . , which seems to offer a reasonable oppor- tunity for development under M/P standards . He stated that an application for site plan approval has not been submitted by the applicant at this time . He recommended that a plan for the westerly portion be developed and offered staff assistance . The Chairman invited comment from the Commission. Commis- sioner Humble , noting that the decision to request an EIS precluded any action by the Planning Commission , advised the members of the forthcoming public hearing on July 31 regarding possible changes to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan , especially as it relates to the Green River Valley. He stated that they should be able to act on the revised plan , which will allow for state and federal requirements , and provide a basis for total rather than piecemeal action . Responding to Commissioner Morrison , Mr. Ericksen pointed out the pond on the map and indicated that it covers approxi - mately 5 . 5 acres in total and extends onto property to the south . Commissioner Ross stated that he believed the pond is the result of an unfinished construction program and noted that construction permits in the Valley are being issued • • THOMAS W. MITCHELL, D.D.S. GENERAL DENTISTRY LAKE HILLS MEDICAL DENTAL BLDG. • 14862 LAKE HILLS BLVD. • BELLEVUE, WA 98007 • PHONE: 747-9840 a2 \IuNE n4/ (b RE/J1( ) rY(.4'ruNlu41 eGwirvirSsrW(J e : A Ptr it A-,knyo&/ 52erl'ISf)-1-4 rl-L -ra�f_ ()Pick purv-D OIU th.s i o N¢ QrzI�11�. btL°jA i'- iAiv1 1 /- U� ii�{ TT-1 i- 1)o tuD Idt) CGf smo►U ) - -r W- DvlL'tivc, 1-i tI xri)tic, S .-Ay30it) • 1IIS p fzeN)0FD Nu)>,Igvu5 00025 oF- NJO-{SAES ) ELL. A-c A F LO Dv eMS . 1461u 6 r b{t. ) 71-I/+T us ,VVT /10 o2mtii A-% I i l k Po M) '5 e 4-PA-6/14 7' ' uA PPOJ ID)wk V4E.h1 Ffca 11U(.I R- 11}3 f(S- . )�►U 1421493 PE.c k Es of A,0 415, r-t Nt_ c,F E C(EA a 4 v?L T-cis >✓� Air_ IM Acuio PuCkS) PI J Iii. Du c .s ) ULADOck) Duc4s ) G( t,u c,Ui Nc; i1 ) $►(-(.• DI(c fr S Ca m ) Of‘ SN )-1 Ac-,0(3 ) o co , f PA ) G F- u w &A S) Sci_ S .c� a �p �f I�� rp-( ( S POND W i C-C V11'1�1 U i-e)Ss S WMoST p 1- i)1. IRA s T )' / R) ��Ik �jl t i s LOOLILO fot ONE Anc42E STEP to SNti 0))2) (71()iv TltRio))vk 0clPlit7Z. Plitt tOTD. (J bl, S)C, Sl_Ab Ca S>-&t.) 01,1 g- K I)-9/21/O 3' S 131<'/) NI c"I c '. FOL- 5)1Z.DS 1 E-'f' i i o k i U F. %)-I ��cuw J(S P0)06 7v tz Pi-Lep. /4 . wfi>ztk0uu, Nino $1 Parr- h E c) ZtT ,'Dtit clt- "hv R 1S t✓ PA Y CA)(- Y /N 7./t w1AD -giuzss /> 4-5 i A) -/='(p./-(. 6vvs THOMAS W. MITCHELL, D.D.S. GENERAL DENTISTRY LAKE HILLS MEDICAL DENTAL BLDG. • 14862 LAKE HILLS BLVD. • BELLEVUE, WA 98007 • PHONE: 747-9840 WO el/ Ruwvu u tl1 DI-3 G ' O . , (= VolA Peat ) vt-- WWEtz- r'-NSo' okrcifi ,4 UlA Sokg- ©g_ (avg. • I.A-10D �!✓ 6I� �I'LLuw ou/Z. 6-4/(1-A1iN Bunt '17 i/u 7i ti a • Awl lei SAto c S D -312L fc' - l,(6KE it(oiuF Y L/-u gE- I�f(� `Dr oA)Aillg'fL GUII D//R? �?lU (1)J . )11v6.41 -. l totiAs LQ, hI1 I rcf-tec( DDs 3e 2s- So, 116 Irz-z • 2Vcf -11543 °F RFN� �� RECEIVED °� 1 1974 G DEj s M Renton Planning Commission - Meeting June 26 , 1974 Page Four Committee, stated that at its meeting of April 17 the Com- mittee recommended that the special permit to fill and grade be granted, inasmuch as it was their opinion that the area was unsuited for" the location of a wildlife sanctuary due to the proximity of a railroad right-of-way and highway. Discussion ensued regarding desirable locality for a wildlife sanctuary and whether or not an EIS is appropriate. It was then MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY SCHOLES , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CONTINUED UNTIL JULY 24, 1974. A roll call vote was requested with the following result: Humble - No Gibson - No Morrison - No Ross - No Scholes - Aye Seymour - Aye Mola - No MOTION DEFEATED. The Planning Director again stated that continuance was recom- mended to allow sufficient time for staff review of the environ- mental assessment. ACTION: MOVED BY SCHOLES, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR, THAT THE ITEM BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK AT THE JULY 10, 1974, MEETING. Discussion followed regarding whether or not the matter was al - ready in committee, the preogative of, the Planning Commission to grant or not grant permits to fill, and the suggestion by Commis- sioner Morrison to give the staff authority to act after their environmental review. On the question, a roll call vote was called with the following result: { Humble - No Gibson - No Morrison No Ross - No Scholes - Aye Seymour - Aye Mola - No MOTION DEFEATED. ACTION: MOVED BY HUMBLE, SECONDED BY ROSS, THAT THE APPLICATION BE CONTIN- UED UNTIL THE JULY 10, 1974, MEETING, WHEN A STAFF REPORT AND COM- MUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT IS ANTICIPATED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. D, MERLINO , GARY ; Appl . SP-768-74; special permit to allow fill - ing and grading in L-1 zone; property located at 3000 East Valley Road. Staff comments were requested by the Chairman . Mr. Ericksen stated that it was the staff ' s opinion that an envi - ronmental assessment was not necessary based on present use of I . Sears-e//4_ Renton Planning Commission Meeting June 26 , 1974 Page Three Discussion followed regarding the full agenda to b.e con- sidered at the July 24 , 1974 , meeting ; and it was MOVED BY SEYMOUR , SECONDED BY SCHOLES , TO RECONSIDER THE PREVIOUS MOTION . . MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY .= Further discussion ensued regarding the necessity of allow- ing a minimum of thirty days for, public study following publication of an EIS , which would preclude possible action in July. Mr. Ericksen stated that the City Attorney had advised that regarding the applicant ' s proposal for a, con- ditional rezone that any such agreement would have to be subject to the outcome of the EIS . State law requires con- sideration of the EIS before action may be taken by the Planning Commission . ACTION: ON THE QUESTION - MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Chairman Mola again opened the original motion to continue the Citizens Service Coprporation application for a vote. - MOTION DEFEATED. MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY ROSS, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR CITIZENS SERVICE CORPORATION BE CONTINUED UNTIL SEPTEMBER 25, ]974. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr . Thomas Buckingham , 5025 Ripley Lane , Renton , asked when the applicant had made the request for continuance and was advised by the Planning Director that the request was made June 25 . .. SPECIAL PERMIT; C. SCARSELLA BROS . , INC . ; Appl . ' No . SP-760-74 ; special i permit to allow filling and grading in G ('M/'P) zone ; property located approximately 1200 ' north of S . W. 43rd on West Valley Highway. Chairman Mole invited staff comment from the Planning Director. Mr . Ericksen reiterated his comments previously stated that the environmental assessment had been received June 25th and would require additional time for staff review. ' The. Chairman asked for any comments from the applicant . 1 1 Mr. Allan Austin , attorney reviewed the position of the applicant. He' noted the convenient location between a railroad right-of-way and the West Valley Highway for industrial use. He cited human uses in the area : trans- portation. facilities , a new sewer line , and availability of water. - Commissioner Scholes , chairman o.f the Community Services Committee , reported that the Committee had met but recom- mended continuance , since they had not had an opportunity to review the environmental assessment . Discussion followed regarding formal notification to the applicant as to the requirement for an environmental assessment. Commissioner Ross , chairman of the Zoning MONTGOMERY, I'URL)UL, IiLANKIN:JIIII' (: AU;AIN ATTOIYNLYS AT LAW W.W. MONTGOMERY ISM NORTON BUILDING AREA CODE 206 WILLIAM MONTGOMERY 682-7090 ROBERT A PURDUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 JOHN D BLANKINSHIP ^ d CARL U LUCKL RATH • ALAN V. AUSTIN • ' June 25, 1979 - rA' OF COUNSEL R.GEORGE FERRER ,V GALE D D. JARVI 5 / 1 PETER D. JARVIS l� 'n GEORGE W. AKERS O JERRY W. SPOONEMORE .0 WILLIAM K GOODWIN ! (L/ I M.WAYNE BLAIR - LYNN O.HURST I!O F R � City of Renton �� RECEIVED 0�\• Planning Department - Municipal Building JUN 2 1074 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 •~••` ATTENTION: Mr. Michael L. Smith %G a(c; DEP Re: Scarsella Brothers, Inc , Rezone and Special Permit Applications Gentlemen: We represent Scarsella Brothers, Inc. and this letter is submitted to you in response to your letter of June 5, 1974 re- questing an environmental assessment of the proposed action. We have followed your outline for Environmental Impact .Statements, , without the summary sheet. A. The Proposed Action The affected property is located along the east side of West Valley Highway north of its intersection with south- west 43rd street. Its legal description is as follows : The South 329 . 85 feet of government lot 7 , Section 25, .Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , King County, Washington. The type of action requested is an amendment to the zoning ordinance rezoning the property from G General Class- ification District to M-P Manufacturing Park District and for permits for filling and grading the property and for the construction of an office building and repair shop there- on. The property is classified for light industry or M-P use on the Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan. It is bounded on the west by the four-lane West Valley Highway and on the • east by the Puget Sound Railroad Right-of-way . The property • i 4 • I City of Renton Planning Department ATT: Mr. Michael. L. Smith Page Two June 25, 1974 immediately adjoining to the north is zoned M-P, as is { property to the south. Sternoff Metals Corporation's operation is located to the southeast across the railroad right-of-way. Scarsella Brothers, Inc. presently operates its con- struction business and repair shop on a site at 16025 Pacific Highway South. The recent death of one of the brother-owners necessitated a division of the business and its assets be- tween the widow of the deceased owner and the surviving owner- brother, Antonio Scarsella. By this division Mr. Scarsella retained the business itself, its operating equipment and the subject property and the widow retained the property and improvements on Pacific Highway South and other real property owned by the corporation. Antonio Scarsella is now president of the corporation. The corporation has been p permitted to continue its operations out of the Pacific Highway site on a temporary basis and under a one-year lease which expires , in May of 1975. Thus, the corporation is obliged to relocate its office and repair facilities and the logical site is the subject property, which has been owned by the corporation for more than ten years. It is classified for the requested use on the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed use would intrude upon no 'other less/ intensive uses. The West Valley Highway pro- vides the site and its proposed use with ideal access. The Planning Commission has previously considered this matter at a public hearing in March of this year. That hear- ing was pursuant to notice and citizen imput was received at that time. The suggestion was made at that hearing that the pond which exists on the back half of the property during the wet season should be retained in its natural state. The applicant owns the property free and clear and proposes to finance the proposed site developments and im- provements through private funds. The proposal is consis- • tent with the master plan for this area. It would be in • ' City of• Renton Planning Department ATT: Mr. Michael L. Smith Page Three June 25, 1974 • furtherance of that plan to change its Land Use Classification from its present holding classification of G to M-P. The actions remaining for implementation are the formal actions of the Planning Commission and the City Council on the rezone application, the review and approval of the site and use plans by the Planning Commission, and the issuance of the permits for the proposed grading and construction. B. Existing Conditions 1. Natural setting The site contains approximately 5. 81 acres and slopes gradually from the west to the east. Its geological make up is the sandy loam typical of the valley. The applicant knows of no animal life living on the property although it would be expected that the property would be visited from time to time by birds and small ground animals indigenous to the valley area. The applicant has personally seen mud hens on the property but has not seen any• ducks or other similar migrating water fowl. The report of the United States Soils Conservation Service indicates that ducks and other migrating water fowl may visit the property on an intermittent basis. The property is undeveloped and completely cleared except for two fruit trees on the western portion, a half dozen or• so small willow trees, and is covered by brushy vegetation such as "skunk cabbage" and the like. There are no evergreens. In the wet season a shallow pond forms on the easterly one-half of the site and on the property to the south. This ' pond is created strictly by surface waters and is not fed by any stream or springs . The pond stagnates and dries up or becomes just mud in the summertime. City of Renton Planning Department ATT: Mr. Michael L. Smith Page Four June 25, 1974 The atmospheric conditions are those generally common to the valley area. No rare or endangered biological or botanical species are known to be present. 2 . Human Use, Development or Values There is no nearby residentially zoned property. There are some scattered, old houses some distance to the south. The large commercial development of South Center is located east across West Valley Highway and the Green River. There are industrial developments to the north including N C Machinery and Stoneway Concrete Products. The existing developments to the west are industrial, notably the large tract used by Sternoff Metals Corporation and a large industrial park. The transportation system in the area utilizes the West Valley Highway for private automobiles, commercial and business vehicles and -public motor buses. The property is also served- on the east by railroad. There are no educational, religious or scientific uses in the area nor any known historical sites . C. Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action 1. Changes in Natural Characteristics 'The proposed rezone itself will cause no changes in the natural characteristics of the property. The proposed filling and grading will remove the existing brush and fill the lower portions of the property to a grade generally leval with the existing grade of West Valley Highway and the seasonal pond will disappear. No significant impact will be caused on the geology or soils. Two buildings, an office building and a- repair shop , will be constructed as shown on the submitted plan. The required parking areas will be surfaced with an impervious City of Renton Planning Department ATT: Mr. Michael L. Smith Page Five June 25, 1974 material. The entire site will be surrounded by cyclone fence for security purposes. The westerly frontage will be landscaped as shown on the submitted plan. The yard area will be surfaced with pervious crushed rock. The fill material to be used will facilitate drain- age and the placement of that fill will not affect existing utilities or other facilities. The impervious roof surfaces and parking areas will be an insignificant portion of the total site and the accelerated runoffs therefrom will be quickly absorbed through the permeable on-site surfaces . The surface waters which now collect on the easterly portion of the property will not be piped or channelled but will be permitted to disburse into their natural drainway. Thus, no change will be made in the natural drainage patterns of the area. The proposed development will cause no significant changes in the atmosphere. Construction equipment will be brought to the site only when in need of repair or servicing which cannot be performed at the location of where the equip- ment is then working. The employees ' and customers ' automobiles and the operation of the office and repair shops will result in no significant increase in the noise and air pollution levels now existing in the area, which are generated by the traffic on West Valley Highway, the train traffic and existing industrial uses in the area. The existing transportation facilities and the utilities now in existence or now being constructed are adequate to service the proposed project. The proposed° project will cause no significant changes in either the biological or botanical species in the area. Community patterns will not be affected. City of Renton Planning Department ATT: Mr. Michael L. Smith Page Six June 25, 1974 The proposed use is compatible with and will not affect existing human uses in the area. The area 's population will not be affected. D. Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Effects On the short term, it is expected that only the on-site grading and construction noise and dust could have any adverse impact. These are certainly mitigated by the size of the site itself, its isolated location from any residential or less intensive uses, and may well be insignificant when considered in light of the existing noise generators in the area, i.e. the West Valley Highway, the railroad, and the existing in- dustrial uses. The approximate construction period for the total completion of the project is one year. There will be no necessity to re-route any vehicular or pedestrial traffic in the area during the construction period. On the long term, only the loss of the pond on the property could be considered an adverse impact. The plan of the Soil Conservation Service to preserve 110 acres of valley wetlands in their existing state has not been implemented and the location of the wetlands is subject to change. The Soil • Conservation Service has indicated that there are other wetlands of superior or equal value located in the valley area which would be acceptable for preservation as part of the plan. The biological significance of this pond is sub- ject to serious question. The allocation of the 110 acres to be preserved among the participating communities and a plan for their acquisition has not been determined nor have the acquisition costs been funded. E. Alternates to the Proposed Action The applicant's existing' office and shop site is available to him only until May of 1975 . Thus, unless he City of Renton Planning Department ATT: Mr. Michael L. Smith - Page Seven June 25, 1974 ceases business, the alternative of staying there is not available. The applicant did not consider alternate sites since the proposed site is already owned and the applicant believes it to. be ideal for his purposes. His proposed use of the site complies with the comprehensive plan and has good location and access. The alternate of developing only the westerly portion of the site was rejected because of the area needs for the operation of the applicant' s business and the desire to have access to the rail line on the east. The use of one-half of the property as part of a public system of valley wetlands is inconsistent with the applicant's proposed use of the pro- perty. F. Relationship Between Local Short-Term Environmental Uses and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity The construction of the West Valley Highway on the west of this property and the rail line on the east signifi- cantly modified its natural character and committed the land to some use more intensive than residential. The Compre- hensive Plan recognizes that fact and states that the suitable future use of this property is industrial. As long as the highway and rail line bracket the pro- perty it will not be developed for residential use. To attempt to preserve this land as open space on a short-term basis by refusing to zone it for its planned use and/or denying permits which would permit its development in accordance with existing codes, is unfair and can have no significant effect on its long-term productivity from an environmental standpoint. To reserve its use as part of a public system of valley wetlands on a long-term basis would require new regu- lations and decisions as to how the public can acquire the • 4 City of Renton Planning Department ATT: Mr. Michael L. Smith • Page Eight June 25, 1974 rights to use . this privately-owned property and how to compensate the owner therefor and spread the cost thereof equitably. The decisions and strategies for controlling land use and human use of the environment should be designed to enhance its long-term productivity. The proposed use of this land does not preclude a wetlands plan for the valley nor its implementation. G. Irreversible and Irretrievable Resource Commitments with the Proposed Action Development in accordance with the proposed plan would allow the alteration of approximately one-half of the property which should be considered to be permanent for at least the useful life of the buildings. The loss of the portion of the pond on this property will be replaced by new buildings and new planted areas . There are wetlands of superior or equal quality located in the valley which can be reserved, which are part of much larger tracts, and which are not bordered on two sides by high use transportation facilities .. Yours very truly, MONTGOMERY, PURDUE, BLANKINSHIP ?& AUSTIN Alan F. Austin AFA:dp cc: Scarsella Brothers, Inc. 'au C.) �� J' PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASAINGTON� • '' o MUNICIPAL BUILDING •• RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • XD0)0)03CM 235-2550 ORl CAPITA.0. June 5 , 1974 Antonio Scarcella, President Scarcella Brothers , Inc . P .O. Box 6205 Seattle, WA 98188 RE : Rezone and Special Permit from City of Renton Dear Mr. Scarcella: This is to notify you that because we feel the suliject property is a unique and fragile area, more information will be necessary prior to any decision as to the future use of the site . Therefore we ask that you submit an environ- mental assessment of the property in accordance with the state environmental policy act including any effects the development may have on it and other elements of the environment . This is not a request for a full Environmental Impact Statement, although we have attached information relating to Impact Statements that may assist you in compiling the assessment . The assessment in actuality is an abbreviated • impact statement that can be used to determine a project ' s • various impacts and possibly whether a full Environmental Impact Statement will be necessary. If you have any further questions please contact this department . Very truly yours , -14/. .'<oege'L•s: ate Michael L . Smith Assistant Planner Enclosures MLS :kh Renton Plannin :omission • Meeting May 8, . j. 74 Page Eight that the staff is determining if an EIS is re- quired at this time . Ross called for a committee meeting for 7 : 30 P. M. , May 22 , to consider the findings of the staff. • Ross advised that the committee had met on the ORDINANCE ON STORAGE OF TRAILERS , BOATS , CAMPERS AND SIMILAR VEHICLES with a concerned citizen but that it was determined that in view of the heavy workload , study on the item would be held in abey- ance . B. AIP - PAW • A detailed agenda of the forthcoming AIP-PAW joint con- ference in Spokane was distributed and discussed . C. RESIGNATION - LYMAN HOUK The Chairman recognized Public Works representative Lyman Houk , who was attending his last Planning Commis- sion meeting . Mr. Houk recounted highlights from his eight years of attending Planning Commission meetings and indicated his appreciation for the cooperation and courtesies extended to him by its members . Chairman Teegarden stated that the Commission appreciated his services , was sorry to see him leave and wished him good luck in his new position . As there was no further business before the Commission , it was MOVED BY GIBSON , SECONDED BY SC,HOLES , THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY . The meeting was adjourned at 12 :00 A.M . I \ ;:•)( • D. Byluun V . Wik, ; Secretary Clark Teegarden , Chairman ' cJ64g,6e//4 - .S/OPP/6t/ Renton Planning(" iwmission Meeting May 8 , 714 Page Seven 3. ZONING COMMITTEE Commissioner Ross , chairman , presented the committee ' s recommendation regarding PARKING IN THE CBD and noted that it eliminates the requirement for parking by pro- viding an exemption district . Discussion followed re- garding the committee ' s rationale . Responding to Scholes , the Planning Director stated that the parking and loading ordinance requires that if there is a change of use , an occupant would be required to meet the park- ing requirements for the new use . He indicated that a number of alternatives to the parking problem in the CBD were considered , and it was decided that what is proposed is probably the most logical solution . ACTION: FOLLOWING DISCUSSION, IT WAS MOVED BY SCHOLES, SECONDED BY ROSS, TO DEFER THIS ITEM UNTIL THE MAY 22ND PUBLIC HEARING AND TO PLACE IT ON THE AGENDA FOR RESPONSE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Commissioner Seymour ' left the meeting at this time . Ross reported that the committee met to consider the SCARSELLA BROTHERS REZONE APPLICATION and indicated that their recommendation was available . Scholes , chairman of the Community Services Committee , to which the item was also referred , requested that an opinion from the City Attorney regarding Shoreline Management jurisdiction , inasmuch as the master pro- gram has yet to be adopted , be provided before the Committee can respond. Discussion followed regarding timing for rehearing the request. ACTION: MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE JOINT COM- MITTEE REPORTS BE, SUBMITTED TO THE COMMISSION FOR, ACTION AT THE MEETING OF JUNE 12 . A roll call vote was requested with the following re- sults : Humble - No Gibson = No Mola - Aye Ross - Aye Scholes - No Teegarden - Abstained MOTION DEFEATED . ACTION: ' MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY HUMBLE, THAT THE SCARSELLA BROTHERS APPLICATION BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING OF JUNE 26, 1974 . MOTION CARRIED UNANI- MOUSLY. A t1 THE CITY OF RENTON INNER o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 op co AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 �� 235 - 2550 O,p4T1D SEPS-�� MEMORANDUM May 2 , 1975 TO : Avery Garrett , Mayor Members of the City Council FROM : Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director RE : Scarsella Brothers , Inc. , Draft Environmental Impact Statement Attached for your information is a copy of the abovementioned subject. cc : Gerard M. Shellan , City Attorney Del Mead , City Clerk Gwen Marshall , Finance Director George Williams , Fire Chief Clark Peterson , Library Director Gene Coulon , Director of Parks and Recreation Hugh Darby, Police Chief Warren C . Gonnason , Public Works Director Tom Touma , Public Works Department James C . Hanson , Building Division JAL :mas I ' • Renton Planning Commission Meeting April 10 , 1974 Page Two ��ALSO, REGARDING THE SCARSELLA BROTHERS APPLICATION, ROSS RAISED THE QUESTION OF THE EFFECT OF THE RECOMMENDED MORA- TORIUM ON FILLING AND REZONES IN THE VALLEY, SINCE THE COUNCIL HAS NOT YET ADOPTED OR DEFINED THE BOUNDARIES OF THE MORATORIUM. REGARDING THE REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS BY FRANK STOREY, IT WAS ASKED BY ROSS THAT THE MOTION GRANT- ING DEFERMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT BE PRECEDED BY THE FOLLOW- ING: "SINCE ONLY THREE OF THE SEVEN ABUTTING LOTS WERE AFFECTED BY THE REQUEST, THAT A PLAN FOR UNIFORM SIDEWALKS MIGHT BETTER BE ACCOMPLISHED AT A, FUTURE DATE AFFECTING THE FUTURE OWNERSHIP OF THOSE PROPERTIES ABUTTING THE STREET," . Regarding the Storey application , it was requested by Humble THAT IT BE NOTED THAT SEYMOUR CONFIRMED THAT IF AN L.I.D. IS PUT IN THE AREA, THEN IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO PUT IN SIDEWALKS. With regard to the roll call vote concerning the Angelo Cala- brese application Seymour requested THAT IT BE RECORDED THAT TEEGARDEN HAD ABSTAINED. Seymour also requested THAT ,THE RECORD REFLECT THAT THE COMMISSION HAD VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO CARRY BOTH THE AMENDED MOTION AND ORIGINAL MOTION BY ROSS, SECONDED BY GIBSON. ACTION: MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY ROSS, THAT THE MINUTES OF MARCH 27, 1974, BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Chairman requested permission to depart from the written agenda to Item 4.A. (4) , VALLEY DEVELOPMENT , inasmuch as Chester Jahns of the Soil Conservation Service had been invited to make a presenta- tion regarding land use and drainage proposals in the Green River Valley. It was MOVED BY MOLA, SECONDED BY SCHOLES , THAT THE AGENDA BE MODI- FLED TO HEAR THE REPORT BY MR. JAHNS OF THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY . 3.1 VALLEY DEVELOPMENT - GREEN RIVER WATERSHED PLAN Chester Jahns , Soil Conservation Service Assistant Project Engineer on the Green River Watershed Plan , presented maps of their proposed drainage system for the Green River Valley . Said plan was adopted in 1966 and is presently in the environ- mental stage . The project area is 16 ,000 acres , of which 110 acres are designated as "mitigated wetlands . " Of the eight designated areas ,• three are located in Renton as follows : one along the east side of the Valley 'freeway ; one situated in Orillia ; and one located east of the West Valley Hightway. Estimated cost of work in the total Valley is $28 ,000 ,000 . Mr. Jahns discussed the location and capability of planned channels and the types of wetlands found in this area,. He listed the following five points to be accepted by local jur- isdictions before the project is begun : 1 1 . Acquisition of wetlands . 2 . Total land use treatment plan for the Valley. ca'arce/A. ,� _ _. ! oS� !./ /Pee, rwni . RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING APRIL 10, 1974 MINUTES COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT; Don Humble , Larry Gibson , Anthone o a , o m ran oss , rthur Scholes , Patricia Seymour, Clark Tee- garden , Bylund Wik . COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: None CITY STAFF PRESENT: James Magstadt , Assistant Planning Director; Michael Smith , Assistant Planner; Lyman Houk , Public Works Depart- ment ; Willis Roberts , Recording Secretary. The April 1974 administrative meeting of the Renton Planning Commission was called to order at 8 :05 p .m. by Chairman Tee- garden . POLL CALL was taken by Secretary Wik. All members re- sponded present with the exception of Scholes (arrived at 8 : 15 p .m. ) and Seymour (arrived at 8 : 10 p .m. ) . 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES : The Chairman called for additions or corrections to the minutes of the meeting of March 27 , 1974 . Commissioner Ross requested that the record be amended to reflect his comments as follows : REGARDING THE GLACIER PARK COMPANY REZONE REQUEST FROM G TO M-P FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY AT THE INTERSECTION WITH STRANDER BOULEVARD, ROSS REQUESTED THAT THE RECORD INDICATE THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMPREHEN- SIVE PLAN OF STREETS AND ARTERIALS IN THE AREA BE PROVIDED. ALSO, REGARDING GLACIER, IN RESPONSE TO THE QUES- TION OF THE EFFECT OF THE ONE YEAR MORATORIUM ON REZONES AND FILLS IN THE VALLEY RECOMMENDED TO THE COUNCIL, ROSS STATED THAT IT WAS HIS OPINION THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION SHOULD NOT CONSIDER ITSELF UNABLE TO ACT UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE MORATORIUM HAS BEEN ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL THROUGH REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURES. REGARDING THE ANGELO CALABRESE REZONE REQUEST FROM R-2 TO B-1 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON N.E. 12TH STREET BETWEEN KIRKLAND AVENUE N.E. AND JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. , WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE QUESTION OF BUSINESS PARKING AND B-1 ZONING ADJACENT TO RESI- DENTIAL AREAS, IT WAS ROSS ' OPINION THAT THE EXIST- ING ORDINANCES RELATIVE TO ZONING AND PARKING AND LOADING ADEQUATELY SAFEGUARD ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. \ REGARDING THE REZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICA- TIONS OF SCARSELLA BROTHERS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET NORTH OF S. W. 43RD STREET ON WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY, ROSS REQUESTED IT BE NOTED THAT THE PLANNING DIRECTOR WAS RESPONDING TO A QUESTION FROM HIM, WHEN HE ADVISED THAT THERE WAS NO PROPOSAL FOR ACQUISITION OF THE PROPERTY BY THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE. OV ti C~ ; p ZPLANNING COMMISSION • RENTON, WASHINGTON rn a `• MUNICIPAL BUILDING 0 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • 81aK 30XO( '235-2550 1� 'ysp0RT CA PITA�OE � April 17 , 1974 ZONING COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES : Staff Member Present : Mike . Smith Committee Members Present : Tony Mola , Larry Gibson , Norm Ross SUBJECT : SCARSELLA BROS. , INC . , Appl . No . R-759-74 , Rezone from G to M/P , and Application No . SP-760-74 , Special Permit to Allow Filling and Grading . The site plan review process and all allowable uses . in the M/P Ordinance were discussed , and it was concluded that these uses would have no detrimental impact on adjacent developed or zoned properties . Examination of Exhibit B and C of Resolution #1864 shows no public access right-of-way through the subject property would be required , although a utility easement may be desirable . The Committee recommends approval of request for rezone to M/P . Request for filling and grading was discussed . The suggested development of a wildlife sanctuary on a portion of the sub- ject property was determined to be the paramount concern to be reviewed. The location of a sanctuary -'should not have a major arterial highway along one side and a main line rail - road trackage on the opposite side . The sanctuary would not benefit from the high cost of installed utilities and access that now exist . The Committee feels the selection of sanctu- ary site should be the result of finding the site to be most remote from major traffic thoroughfares and that it should be planned into a compatible development that would best pre- serve those amenities needed to nurture the existence of our fellow creatures . A survey -plan that does show the final grade elevation to be compatible with abutting rights-of-way and adjacent proper- ties should be of record ; if such a plan is submitted showing the final grade does conform with the Soil Conservation Serv- ice specifications , the Committee would recommend approval to the Commission body . Meeting recessed at 8 : 00 p . m. - reconvened at 10 : 15 p .m . and adjourned at 11 : 00 p .m. Renton Planning Comi s i on ._ Meeting March 27 , 1;, - Page Six The effects of the Shoreline Master Program on the applica- tion were noted. A Shoreline Management Substantial Develop- ment Permit will be necessary , and an environmental impact statement may be required. It was also indicated that the Green River Valley one year moratorium on rezones and fills affect this proposal . Comments from the audience were invited by the Chairman . John Welsh , 18448 - 48th South , Renton , owner of property north of the site , indicated his support of the rezone and special permit request. He described the pond as stagnant and presenting a health h;zzArd.. Further discussion followed . ACTION: MOVED BY HUMBLE, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR , THAT THE APPLICANT 'S REQUEST FOR REZONE BE REFERRED TO THE ZONING COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK AND THE REQUEST FOR FILLING AND GRADING BE REFERRED TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Chairman advised Mr. Scarsella that he would be notified , when the committees were ready to report . SPECIAL PERMIT D. PETERSON , ROGER ; WITSOE , STAN ; Appl . No . SP-754-74 ; special permit to construct nine duplex buildings in R-2 zone ; property located at N . E . 8th Street between Harrington and Jefferson N . E . The Planning Director described the proposed nine unit duplex development on a 66 ,000 square foot site in an R-2 zone . Slides and aerial photographs of the area were shown . Exist- ing uses in the vicinity , including duplexes and single family residences , were pointed out. Off-site improvements would be required , in accordance with City ordinance . The exception to the Subdivision Ordinance requested earlier has been resolved . Comments from the applicant were invited by the Chairman . Roger Peterson , 1836 N . E . 36th , Renton , advised that the loca- tion of the duplexes was established to avoid traffic clutter at the end of the cul -de-sac . Each unit is designed and situ- ated to resemble a single family residence . He stated that they were meeting : 1 R the requirements rements of the Subdivision Ordi - nance . Responding to Chairman Teegarden , Mr . Peterson indicated that they intend to keep the property at the end of the cul -de- sac as open space . A. L . Vaughn , 3013 N . E . 8th , Renton , inquired regarding the height of the property . He stated that N . E . 8th is a narrow street , and he feels that 18 additional units will mean con- gestion on the street. He also feels there are too many units planned for the property . Charles Gramps , 2919 N . E . 8th P1 . , Renton , questioned the lot sizes planned and stated that he feels the development will depreciate the value of his property which borders on the site . Chairman Teegarden asked the applicant why he didn ' t sub- divide the property . Mr. Peterson stated that they are the tentative purchasers and that this procedure would be a shorter process . ItviiIon I' Idnniir -`Commission Meeting March 19/4 Page Five Chairman Teegarden recommended that restrictive cove- ; nants be drawn up at the time the request is presented to the Council . Mr. Er,icksen noted that the covenants would have to be filed voluntarily by the applicant. A five minute recess was declared by the Chairman at 10 :05 p .m. The meeting resumed at 10 : 15 p .m. with the Secretary reporting all members as being present. - REZONE AND SPECIAL PERMIT C, SCARSELLA BROS. , INC . ; Appl . No . R-759-74 ; rezone from G to M/P ; and Appl . No . SP-760-74 ; special permit to allow filling and grading ; property located approximately 1200 feet north of S . W. 43rd Street on West Valley Highway. The Chairman requested that the Commission consider both the application for rezone and request for special permit to allow filling and grading of this property simultaneously . He asked for a presentation from the Planning staff. • Mr. Smith , Assistant Planner , pointed out the location of the 5 . 8 acre site , which is situated east of the West Valley Highway at S. W. 43rd . The area is adjacent to an existing M-P parcel . The site is presently unde- veloped and includes a large ponding area , which will require filling . Mr. Smith noted that the pond has been under study by the Soil Conservation Service and has been ' proposed for preservation as a natural habitat for water- -fowl . The proposed use is for an office building , ware- house and outside storage area for construction equipment. Slides and aerial photographs of the site were shown by the Planning Director. Mr. Teegarden invited comment from . the applicant. Antonio Scarsella , president of the corporation , stated that they would like to fill the site to allow for building or sale . He indicated they plan to fill the entire site , raising the grade so that it will drain toward the Green River rather than the Milwaukee/Burlington Railroad tracks . He described the pond as a breeding place for mosquitoes and noted that it almost dries up in the summer months . At this time they prefer to build a construction facility for their business to replace the one presently located off Highway 99 . Landscaping and fencing will be provided. They hope to complete construction some time this summer and will comply with. any City requirements . Discussion followed regarding consideration of preserva- tion of natural areas . The Planning Director advised that there was no proposal for acquisition of the property _ by the Soil Conservation Service . The site is part 'of an. area presently under study in the Valley Drainage Plan . It will be incumbent upon local jurisdictions and indus- trial owners to comply with the requirements of the Soil Conservation Service . Therefore , this is a factor to be considered by the Planning Commission . The Chairman requested that the Planning Director prepare a briefing on the question of preservation of natural areas to be presented at the April administrative meeting . i • FF • Staff Report March. 22 , 1974 • Page Four STAFF Recommend approval subject to : RECOMMENDA- TION : 1 . Applicant providing landscaping and screen- ing along property lines adjacent to single family uses . Existing fence is to be re- habilitated. 2 . Landscape plan to be submitted and subject to approval of Planning Department . 3 . Provisions for retention and maintenance of open space at north end of subject site by restrictive convenants or home owners • association agreement. 4. Provision of a landscaping installation and maintenance bond . 5 . A 20 ' setback to be provided for all struc- tures from N . E . 8th . APPLICATION : SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT : SCARSELLA BROS . , INC . LOCATION : Approximately 1200 feet north of S . W. 43rd on West Valley Highway . ZONING : The existing zoning is G -- (Proposed M-P) APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 4-722 (B) ; Ordinance #2820 REQUEST : Applicant is requesting Special Permit from Planning Commission in accordance with re- quirements of Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance . Planning Commission approval of the proposed fill , while representing a relatively small area in the Valley , could establish, precedence for consideration of similar type permits at a future date . COMMENTS : 1 . Proposed ultimate use of site for con- struction equipment storage and repair facility and office building . 2 . Applicant has requested rezone of property from G to M-P . 3 . Proposed fill plan meets requirements of the Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordi - nance with the exception that the reuse plan has not been submitted to date . 4. Proposed fill would eliminate existing pond area. • 1 . 5 . The requirement of an EIS should be addressed at this time prior to placement of any fill . i6 . Proposed reuse of the site , if M-P zoning is approved , would require site plan appro- val by Planning Commission . The require- ment of additional controls could be con- si,dered at the time of site plan approval . F/r>2: • Staff Report March 22 , 1974 Page Five STAFF This will be the first Special Permit considered RECOMMENDA- under the new Mining , Excavation and Grading TION : Ordinance , and a detailed review by Commission and staff with regard to procedures is in order. The question of the EIS requirements should also be reviewed in detail . APPLICATION : WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS APPLICANT : FRANK A. STOREY LOCATION : Kennewick Ave . N. E . and N . E . 14th St . ZONING: G-7200 APPLICABLE SECTIONS 9-1105 ,6 . OF THE SUBDIVISION CODE : REQUEST : Applicant requests waiver of requirements to install sidewalk as per Subdivision Ordi - nance . COMMENTS : 1 . Applicant has posted a bond and received a deferral from the Board of Public Works until such time as the lots are developed . 2 . A building permit has been issued on one of the three parcels . 3. Applicant has installed all the necessary improvements except the sidewalks . • 4 . Similar improvements exist in the general area but not in the immediate area of the short plat. 5 . The Public Works Department recommends that sidewalks should be installed . STAFF RECOMMENDA- Recommend denial of waiver due to the existence TION : of similar improvements in the area and the - existence of all the other necessary improve- ments except the sidewalks . ( i . e . curbs , gutters , etc. ) Renton Planning Commission Meeting March, 13, . 1974 Page 'Three Discussion followed regarding the arrangement of the structures on the site and, plans for surrounding green areas . At this time, there was also discussion regard- ing the requested, exception to the Subdivision Ordinance. INC App.l . No.,' special E. ,- S�CARSELLA BROS. , INC. ; SP-760-74; permit to. allow, filling and grading in G (NIP) zone; property located approximately 1200' north of S.W. 43rd on. West Valley , Highway. Mr.' Smith described 'the' applicant' s proposal to fill the subject site fora, construction equipment storage and repair 'facility. . 'F,i l l.i fig of the ponding area was dis- cussed, with particular reference to the level' of fill in relation to the P-1 ,'Channel :' An environmental impact statement may have to 'be submitted,, and the applicant's proposed reuse plan is still forthcoming. „ WAIVERS F. STOREY,, FRANK A. ;' Appl . No. W-,75`5-74; request for waiver of.. off-site improvements, in G-7200 zone ; • property located on N. E. 14th. and .Kennewick Ave . N. E. Slides and aerial photographs of the'. property, located in the Kennydale area , were shown.` The applicant has installed: all 'necessary improvement's except sidewalks and is requesting 'a waiver of' the ',requirement to- install sidewalks , as specified in the. Subdivision Ordinance . Mr. ' Storey ' has been granted a . deferment, from the Board of Public Works subject to posting .of, a, bond and Plan- ning Commission review,. ; EXCEPTION FROM SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE G. PETERSON , ROGER; ,'WI'TSOE, ' STAN ;'- .Appl'. . N'o. E-753-74; request for excepti.o.n from Subdivision Ordinance from the 60 foot property frontage requirements ; property located at . N . E. 8th. Street between Harring- ton and Jefferson 'N.E.: At- the time of presentation of the applicant' s request �. .. for a special. permit, there was also discussion regard'- i Ag their request for: an exception from th'e Subdivision Ordinance to allow '.le.s.s.' than sixty" feet frontage for. two lots that do'. not meet minimum width requirements . The possibility of eliminating this need by small shifts of the lot lines was considered and will be -studied by the staff. FIELD TRIP A field. trip to view the above properties was .scheduled for Saturday,, March 23rd,, at 8: 30 a.'m. ' The , group will meet at the .Renton Inn .' 3- CITY COUNCIL REFERRALS: H. COMMERCIAL ZONE .EAST OF FAI 405 , MAY CREEK ,The subject ,area , located east' ;of FAI 405 .on May Creek is included in the Shoreline Master Program. The present ' ' . Renton Planning: Commission - - . , ' - , Meeting ..March 13 , ,1974 , _ Page Four • ' ' zoning .`.and Comprehens'ive, _Land. ':Us:eP1-an:, .is inconsis,tent.'..wi'th ' • • ' the Master ,Program... The ',problem-has.: been ,•referred to.: the ', .. ' • Planning. Commission 'for 'r:eview a'n'd recommendation .4and,'• is:. , ' • • being , studied .,by the, Comp:r'ehe'nsi-ve;' P1 an. 'Committee ,• ., ' , '' , - • I . ' `SUB-REGIONAL ' TRANSPORTATION• ,STUDY:", • ' , . • • , ' ' The . Planning Di r'recto :a�dvi sed;'the:.Comm-i•ssi on " concerning the • - - ', '. • history 'of., the subject Matter.,: originally .;referred. .to a:s. .the , Renton :Area ,Transportation ;Study.: for.T.he.` need • rec,ons:i dera- . - . ti,on .'and. review of Rento:n:':s .;total - transportation. need's., has , , ' ' . been ,,expressed,• by .the, • Was.h,i:ngt'on. ;Sta'te Highway Department:'.' , • , The. question., was' referred, ;by -Mayor. Gar:re,tt'.to' 'the '•Ci,ty •Coun-. • ci 1 ,, which has reque,s,ted-,'feasibility review.,'by the ' Roe-rd.:of, • Publ is Works and its Transportation. Committee a'nd the, Plan- ning • Commission,. • The;.'Pl.anniing,: Commission has been asked to • . • review the:feasibility as. .it.=r. elates, to. •u•pdati'ng., the tarter- ' - . • • i,al• street. program .as ,an ,element, of the:.,•;Comprehensive. •P.l'an . ,; .., AC'T ION ' 'MOVED BY' ,SCHOLES', SECONDED,..BY:,SE,YMO'UR.,. THAT THE ;QUESTI.ON :OF ' THE' SUBREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY ,.-BE, REFERRED. TO 'THE' COM- PREHENSIVE-•PLAN .COMMITTEE,FOR STUDY AND. ;REPORT BACK., MOTION ' CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ' '4: • ,ADMI-NISTRATIVE: • ; ;• • , ' .-(A): .COMMITTEEE REPORTS'' , . , _ • . •`The,. Chai,rman called' for ,, C.ommi,t,tee, reports • • . CO`MPRE.HEN,SIVE PLAN: COMMITT:EE', '' -• ' • ' M_r: ,T;ega`e, ,rden' 'asked, th;e'.P;lanni`n:g‘,;Directo'r' tor • a, report ,o.n;•: • 'th,e ;s'tatus , of• the Shell. Oi,'1-..,: `om'.pa'ny,-.app'l:,ica'ti en,. ., •M.r. ;°Eri.c•k- ' • 'se.n -•a'dv-i'sed. th.at,.a letter.;.was�'ma;i'led..,'to..'Sh'ell requesting " . - • their response on the environmental impact, , stateme:ntt .',,.;.:No `. ` , ,' . . - ' 'response ' has been. ' rece.i ved`,at., ,th,i's'. ;time:. ' . ' • ,COMMUN'ITY S•ERV.I.C'ES,•'COMMITT'E'E • ' • _ ` ` Chairman..S,ch.oles'L're or'ted :me:et'ing,''s'e',vera,l `times "re a'r',dn ' p g. g. g r.. • ' -Whitman Court (G,len'coe.-,Hon.eydw Circul'a.ti�o,n:, a:nd-'•Lan'd. :U�s:e`,';, ': .. Study) referral ' ,T , . • Commissioner ,Scho,l e`s ra•1`'so reported '_a,t,ten-di ng the Soil 'Co'n- ' . serv'a'tio:n .Ser.vice meeting-,:.o.n Mar,ch' ,5,�,:., 197.4, . rel,ati'ng ,:'to.''th,e. " . .. •••" '. r ', . ' '.Vall;ey '.Dra.inage ' Study.., Commissioner ,,Wi,k. .of •the :Committee: . • ' ' :reported meeting , on,-•Ma'rch .:7 ,•,•1,974,',,,with' County Councilman • - ' • Mooney, -Soil' Conserv.a.ti�on,r.Se"rvi ce ,',':an,d ;•Ci•ty representatives':;. ; •o:f� Renton,,',:Kent . and Tukwi l;a,. regardi�-ng:.Green River., Valley „ . `• " : ' drai na'ge .: 'Mooney , i s .att,em:pti.ng.:,to: ;get; involved communities - „ to,,,thi nk, seriously. about :=t.h:e 'pro.pos,a;l s.:.'by the Soi 1 •.Co;nse,r;va_,. •'tion.. Service: regarding land Use _and•;':dr'ainage . problems:;in;:the' '. Va.l ley.. ZON'IN'G .COMMIITTEE ' • . . ' Chairman 'Ross' called a .;meet'i n of `h.e' :Commit e .for: 4M' ';.g� '�t toMarch iti', , • 1974, , at .7:130- p.mf. ,' '-to 'di;scuss.';the; ••Parking. and .L'oad.ing;,,.Ordi�; ' . n ance ,and, Downtown :problems,',:• ', ,. - 1 Renton penning Commission Meeting March 13, 1974 Page Two B. CALABRESE, ANGELO Appl . No. R-758-74; rezone from R-2 to B-1 ; property located ,on N.E. 12th Street between Kirkland Ave. N. E. and Jefferson Ave. N.E. The property, site of Tony Go " s Restaurant, was indicated by Mr. Smith . The applicant proposes to expand his busi- ness and parking into three lots now occupied by duplex dwellings . These lots are presently zoned R-2 ; the Com- prehensive Land Use Plan designates the area for medium density, multi-family residential use . Discussion followed regarding the conflict between the existing B-i use and the proposed commercial use with the Comprehensive Plan. It was noted that a change in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan ord r. The Commission may also cbnslder the extension of the present use or use of B-P (Business Park- ing) zoning and the imposition of restrictive covenants for site development. Ca SCARSELLA BROS . , INC . ; Appi . No. R-759-74; rezone from G to M>P; property located approximately 1200 ' north of 51 Ord on West Valley Highway. The location of the 5.8 acre site , situated east of the West Valley Highway at S.W. 43rd and west of the Milwaukee/ Burlington Railroads was reviewed. It was noted that the site is generally surrounded by G zoning , but there are parcels zoned' M/P , H-1 and B-1 in the vicinity. The property includes a large pond which is a habitat for numerous water- fowl . Responding to an inquiry by Commissioner Scholes , Mr. Erick- sen stated that the Commission recommendation to the City Council for a one year moratorium on rezones in the Green River Valley is presently being studied by the Council Com- munity Services Committee . It was also noted that the site comes under the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, inasmuch as it lies within 200 feet of the Green River. Provisions of the Mining , Excavation and Grading Ordinance relate to the site development, including the erection of an office building and construction repair shop and outside stor age area , as some filling of the site will be required. The proposed rezone is in agreement with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. At this time , slides and aerial photographs of the proposed rezones were shown by the Planning Director. • SPECIAL PERMITS D, PETERSON , ROGER; WITSOE , STAN ; Appl . No . SP-754-74 ; spe- cial permit to construct nine duplex buildings in "R-2 zone; property located at N . E . 8th Street between Harring- ton and Jefferson N. E. The location of the site was pointed out on the 'short plat plan by Mr. Smith. It was noted that to the. south and west are multifamily residences in the .R-2 zoned area ; to the north and east there are some single family homes . The Planning Director advised the Commission that before the Comprehensive Land Use Plan was established , the area had been designated medium density multiple family. The request is an allowed use in an R-2 zone , subject to approval by the Planning Commission . r/2 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING MARCH 13, 1974 MINUTES COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Humble , Norman Ross , Arthur Scholes , Patricia Seymour, Clark Teegarden , Bylund Wik. COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Larry Gibson , Anthone Mola, Eve- lynn Carue. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen , Planning Director; Michael Smith , -Assistant .Planner; Lyman Houk, Public. Works Department ; Willis Roberts , Recording Secretary. The March 1974 administrative meeting of the Renton Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Teegarden at . 8:05 p.m. 1. ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary Wik. All Commissioners responded present except Carue (out of town) , Gibson (illness in family) , Mola (unable to attend due to press of business ) , and Seymour previously advised of delay in arrival ) . ACTION: MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY HUMBLE, THAT THE ABSENT COMMIS- SIONERS BE EXCUSED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. NEW PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: REZONES . Noting that there were a number of applications for rezone on the agenda , the Chairman requested a brief resume regard- ing them from the Planning Director. Mr. Ericksen introduced Assistant Planner Michael Smith to the Commission and indicated that he would be participating in the presentations . Smith reviewed the rezone applications as follows : Ai GLACIER PARK CO. ; A 1 . No . R-757-74* rezone from to ; property ocate on east s e o est Valley Highway at intersection with Strander Blvd. Mr. Smith pointed out :the location of the Glacier prop- erty, which is divided into two parcels , both situated immediately east of the West Valley Highway at its i ;ter- section with Strander Boulevard and near the Renton- Tukwila boundary. Location- of significant geographic features in the area and their relation to the site were noted . Glacier plans construction of a restaurant facil- ity , designed in a railroad motif, and possibly a bank building on the westerly parcel . There are no plans at present for the easterly parcel , which has an access problem. Some, filling may be necessary. Rezone to M/P is in agreement withthe Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Commissioner Seymour joined the meeting at 8: 15' p.m. MEMORANDTI • TO Files DATE March 13 1974 FROM Mike Smith SUBJECT Scarsella Brothers , Special Permit/Rezone I talked with Mr. Scarsella again today and further informed him of the requirements of the Special Permit process . I reviewed the requirements of a site plan, landscaping plan, and parking plan . He indicated that he would submit these plans as soon as possible before the hearing date . ' MLS/ms • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1VitU AN DUM TO files DATE 3/ 12/M FROM Mike Smith SUBJECT Scarcella Bros . Special Permit and Rezone I talked today with Mr . Scarcella ' s engineer informing him of additional requirements of the Special Permit pro- cess . These included : ( 1 ) detailed plans indicating the proposed use of the site , (2 ) more detailed drainage . and other plans could be required as the review process proceeds , (3 ) State floodplain permit requirements , and (4) Shoreline Management Permit publication requirements . cc : G .. Y. Ericksen MS :wr • • • • • 1:\\)