Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutShort Plat File No 33-76 LY Ye «| My ay a PUBLIC HEARING Sts 2. 1 yo x 4 wy CITY OF RENTON a: pe gh PLANNING COMMISSION we : A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON DECEMBER 3, 1976 — 8:00 PH, TO CONSIDER THE ITEM DESCRIBED BELOW: EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE: EMMETT KINDLE; Appl. E-900-76; request for exception to subdivision ordinance for a three-lot short plat; property located in the vicinity of 2625 Jones Ave. N.E. Sia ae ater ae THE PUBLIC 15 INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO E COMMENTS IN WRITING, IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CO CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DE ae ' r i | ge — i ae ar ee i ae = a 7 ; 1 GS-I7 . NORTH | $5 sa 4 eS eR : . . ale f = eee Wi | 7 4 cas! | Ferri ae ry ' eine cons oH ne i = 4 Liitga iit — | 52 on 362 Ne a ee hoa 2 BREN 4 = zz 225 ff 203 i} EMMETT KINDLE P. ” EXCEPTION is e — 5 es Saag nt a ee i to | 237 222 tte ze ee 4 pea : ae i a St es ORs aes | area oe aero aero ae ee > a {e — pe em ii | d Ht og a 405 | 2820 274 *- 25e | 24 ao 22 a 4 rei sf i a eee a i gp >. eh agth _#l cae . gis 8 OWT = is eee aN ‘a a ko ae 14 aoe sea ars _| jae api wus mt a Rae sect aan 278 | zee 253) 1.202 235 2225 2 aoe i PS arouse aaa 7% Re = z = — ES pee ee a ee / a“ Tete fhe Sabra A eel eto oo Po 'G-7200, fs. ae 4 , OO oo iy eee ee ; ie aes! 272 203. 292, 243 Ade eqe aes we ts piel sealer it Le “S ac ce ie XPRESS OP ENTONS OR SUBMIT - NTACT: PARTMENT, 235-2550 | MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S. RENTON, WA. 98055 fi a aaks Faas BT ag ACUTE . . A ; / ole ee aera | wv | i we SUPTDTITL api | : = ff (ee TTT va foie] | Ej Ley ae - 7 Lnleteis / aes of | | PTA rt inh rT) se jae ee y wt tt I Tha generar: Se ee a EXCEPTION cen | i 5 i| Te | ] ——— aa goof || | | a GRA z — FI tele, 4 ’ SRE eest JO N E S DA Y T O N AV E N E TA F | i oS € P=") x2 fous = EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE: EMMETT KINDLE; Appl. E-900-76; request for exception to subdivision | ordinance for a three-lot short plat; property located in the vicinity of 2625 Jones Ave. N.E. APPLICANT EMMETT KINDLE TOTAL AREA +1.59 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Jones Avenue N.E. EXISTING ZONING G-7200 EXISTING USE Vacant PROPOSED USE Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential COMMENTS Exception is to allow a +170' pipestem to rear lot of a proposed three-lot short plat. STOP STOP STOP STOP OTOP! DOCUMENTS UNDER THIS NOTICE HAVE BEEN MICROFILMED. DO NOT REMOVE NOTICE FROM FILE. NEW FILING SHOULD BE ADDED ON TOP OF NOTICE. PAGES REMOVED UNDER THE NOTICE FOR COPYING MUST BE RETURNED TO THE SAME PLACE UNDER THE NOTICE. SLOP! STOP STOP STOP STOP BEGINNING OF FILE x wW Invoice No = CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 City CLERK Department or Division Please make checks payable to Mr. Emmett Kindle 25 - fonem Nek. Finance Department City of Renton tenton, Wask. 9Ba5RS Kecaxding Fees for Short Plat #3376 with Kine KeCOTGCS & Elections bepartmeant . : sah 5 fe’ rt LOe E, 4at #€$34-76; enslocas: ¥ eceiving y LIEGLIG?F ES } ¥ Total Due CITY OF RENTON PLAT APPLICATION . PLAT Shitedt FCF FS -Z =) Rees FILE NO. 4-902 76 MAJOR PLAT Ij "ON DATE REC'D w-29-76 (%-’7-46) } C3 oe tf. TENTATIVE . aN FEE __$ SO,~ Shorfolst . SC, 7 P tri — eN — fli PRELIMINARY | 9 23 i RECEIPT no. 102 ( 4 @ if FINAL i ae, SM NO. PUD NO. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7: kw Plat Name & Location LAINIE TF LO VILE SSAOVE, LEAL W Sipe Jones le WE. piipugy Bezwctts NE2Y the 2E H! Sx No. Lots__9 Total Acreage LNXI zoning G-7200 Owner LWIMIECTT LIS) 2.2 Phone FCC —£ Os Z.. Address 76723 4 fmxes Ze pve Keeps Fon LATTA 4 Engineer Kesppwen+ Ovc_cerR Phone 7S § - {QSY Address GQ 6oK 27S 2 Va cous LATA Underground Utilities: . Yes No Not Installed Telephone __ _ —— Electric _ = _ Street Lights _ _ —— Natural Gas _ = —— os TV Cable _ Zt. ee Sanitation & Water: /*7 City Water Sanitary Sewers /_/ Water District No. RO L Dry Sewers Septic Tanks Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance 10. LL Li's DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PAR BUILDING HEA TRAFFIC ENG. STA KS LTH TE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER STAFF ACTION: ___ SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENTED _ TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: __PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED ___FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ___ PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED __ FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: DATE DATE BOND NO. & EXPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept. Rev. 12/71 AFFIDAVIT Lommel YY. Now dle , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me f this 294 aay of Zauemtlier/ , 1976, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Zéo2zZpwe ; pn a se seewee tL WA Ki, hbo (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) Yoo JIA Cha Lae Zt, PEnLon P FASS 1635 -h- Jowes NE. (Address) (Address) :2 pe yes A CH fan! tuiA- SEAS ST (City) (State) Q2ZE-FYI AL (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify thatthe foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been ane : A Pehthyrough and complete in every particular and to conform to the r égulations of the Renton Planning pepartment governing the fi Ads “sate ban cai S) \t Ni a9 BiG | i y Ay, ; _ a) R a 20S EE ‘ ie ae Renton Planning Dept. 2273 Date Received 119 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. Short (Vat No. 33° Fé - Lreeption £-Gt0-7 Environmental Checklist No. LCF = f~GI- FC PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: C] Declaration of Significance [_Joeciaration of Significance C] Declaration of Non-Significance C] Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their Own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND : 1. Name of Proponent FAMAETT Pp 7 ce 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 2628 B fares KE 2 PF bne SULT, 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal, if applicable: om ers VICE JLAZ 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Syea7 lean -at eS) PERIUBRL CSE =0i- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal): Less Ses vbses is NE Keaony Bbejuzenw KLE 24 GFREZBUWIS 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal:. ee 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal, state and local--including rezones): —- VA SL Jt ERM CA IG FEB ah 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: ful 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: KIO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: (HOME Il. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- ' covering of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? a Yes MAYBE NO (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any L unique geologic or physical features? - (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? = (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the oa bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ¢ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (2) (3) Air Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? a YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? _ YES MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, Or any change in climate, either locally or a regionally? a YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? — YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or : the rate and amount of surface water runoff? = YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? a YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? — YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? — YES MAYBE N (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of _ ground waters? _ — YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through _— interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? VES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, ; or other substances into the ground waters? - = E MAYBE NO (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? a YES MAYBE NO Explanation: LCL IEE!MT PLOW DOP Zz. FOEVMK. LXA Ytrt FELD SEVCCOLM ZLHIC Iatre CRI 1M) AGT Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) (b) (d) Explanation: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? YES Reduction of the numbers aT ay unique, rare or endangered species of flora? ee Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Yrs Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ver (5) (6) -4- Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? — YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? “a YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? 2 YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? (ee YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? = YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or _ glare? = YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? — YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? = YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? — YES MAYBE NO Explanation: = Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ ee YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ sell YES MAYBE NO Explanation: a (12) (13) (14) (16) =§s Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Daal YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? ~ YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand i“ for new parking? i YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? a“ Yes MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? — YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? a YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, ot bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: A /AK@CTISE Vy hepa Versrcees 5S Jessy Aa.eae Citeas Or feesypepys- (a2 Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? oc YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? . at. YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? ie YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? él YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? — YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — YES MAYBE N (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require a the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? a YES MAYBE N (b) Communications systems? ses, | eee Sei, Eee YE MAYBE NO (c) Water? —_— YES MAYBE NO T1l. (d) Sewer or septic tanks? _— * YES MAYBE =O (e) Storm water drainage? -_ YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? — YES MAYBE NO Explanation: FO S51 BLE dEenhey ER Fees ror (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? = YES MAYBE NO Explanation: . (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? — YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? oo YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? __ 7 ae YES MAYBE NO Explanation: __ _— SIGNATURE is true and complete. I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful / i siargut tl PO Flees LL, Proponent: ck of full disclosure on my part. “(signed = ie LOA DAIE FT i TUNES (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 KENNETH J. OYLER CIVIL ENGINEER & LAND SURVEYOR P.O. Box 2258 e¢ Renton, Wa 98055 255-5050 PARCEL A The West 150 feet of Tract 5, together with the North 34 feet of Tract 6. Except the North 14 feet of the East 170 feet thereof, all in Eldon Acres, according to Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 86, Records of King County, Washington. PARCEL B The South 64 feet of the East 170 feet of Tract 5 together with the North 14 feet of East 170 feet of Tract 6, all in Eldon Acres, according to Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 86, Records of King County, Washington. PARCEL C The South 70 feet of the East 170 feet of Tract 6 of Eldon Acres, according to Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 86, Records of King County, Washington. PARCEL D The South 90 feet of Tract 6, except the South 70 feet of the East 170 feet thereof, all in Eldon Acres according to Plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 86, Records of King County, Washington. KNoknT . a OLTH LIVE Sec. F Cone Morr MM B9"O3' A2S"Ww ~ = M4 Coe. S-23-5 | .(s 0 oly map Sf | Q | AS 89 °OF AS "Ww | ° \y /50.00 ~ enieaeiamamede: Uk. S S . lo Yo y Sho 4 ey y 9 . Ss A89°03'S5"W_ 30" || 3 yO A wal * "170.004 QQ \ h phere % z . > N ‘I: | . » r Q Nq a | j — ' > a RQ 170.00 ~ | Q) a) x M 89°03'48" HW Q 320.00" 8 8 $ vooR g al & I Se te 770.00 ™ - NY 2 g D : aa . 7 Cc « ey : P 2 ir NEPOF ASW 32200 | 5 J Map on File in Vault N Direction: | Scale: /"=/O0' ee ooo I I r I 3 0 50 100 150 2a0 Z5D rt Plat No. Page of Sate March 18, 1977 TO: Planning Department FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT : Kindle Short Plat The Utilities Division (Engineering) has no objection to the Kindle Short Plat on Jones Ave. N.E., south of Kennydale School, provided the following conditions are met: 1. Easements for a future sanitary sewer are provided 2. Restrictive covenants or other commitments made to support future sanitary sewer L.I.D. formation. RB: pmp ® Seattle -King County / DEPARTMENT oF Pustiic HEALTH Public Safety Building Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 625-2161 x LAWRENCE BERGNER, M.D., M.P.H. Director of Public Health February 16, 1977 Mike Smith Renton Planniny Dept. Fenton vity Hall 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 RE: Emmett Kindle Short Plat Dear Mr. Smith: This department has not received and does not have any knowledge of any soil studies or perc tests done on the proposed lots. Prior to our approval of a subdivision on septic tanks, we would require that anengineers or designers report be submitted (this would include one soil log and one perce hole on each undeveloped lot). A field check showed that lots C and D may not meet our minimum soil requirements. These lots appear to have been filled (installation of drainfields in fill is contrary to ordinance and they may also have a nigh winter water table. Very truly yours, William F. Liending, K.S. Supervising Sanitarian environmental Health Service SSE Service Center BEH: 1k DISTRICT HEALTH CENTERS: CENTRAL NORTH EAST SOUTHEAST SOUTHWEST 1000 Public Safety Building 1600 N. E. 150th 15607 N. E. Bellevue- 3001 N. E. 4th St. 10821 8th Ave. S. W. Seattle 98104 Seattle 98155 Redmond Road Renton 98055 Seattle 98146 625-2571 363-4765 Bellevue 98008 228-2620 244-6400 885-1278 2625 B Jones Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98055 February 3, 1977 Mr. James Magstadt, Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Waiver of Offsite Improvements Property located at 2625 Jones Ave. N.E. Dear Mr. Magstadt: I am requesting a waiver for offsite improvements due to the following reasons: I have curb and gutter installed except approximately 50 feet of the above-captioned property. Also, the property is not graded to street level, there is no black top installed and no existing sidewalks in the area. I am requesting this waiver until such time as building improvements start. Thank you for your consideration. Yours_ truly, Ba Ut Z a eed pf - € - Emmett H. Kindle i \ DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS es LA WHEREAS, eel | MTA ’ ‘ 5) x | a | a 7 / \ 5. b are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, Grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner(s) of the above described property, their suc- cessors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree and covenant to participate in, sign a petition in support of, and accept any future Local Improvement District (LID) or city initia- ted proposal, and pay their fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. Said improve- ments shall include but may not be limited to the installa- tion of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, undergrounding of utilities, and street lighting. These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9-1105(6) of Title IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining Subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. > r a Nee LC | STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) On this 3rd day of February , 19 77_, before me personally appeared Emmett H. Kindle 5 : ° 3 the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. %. _ . ee ~ - a on LF ines, nee APA pla. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton KENNETH J. OYLER CIVIL ENGINEER & LAND SURVEYOR P.O. Box 2258 « Renton, Wa 98055 255-5050 Nove 16,1976 Planning Commision, City of iienton, Re: Proposed Short Plat For Emmett Kindle m & o facilitate the survey and keep uniform lines due 2 previous sevregation, tye ripestem access to the rear lot exceeds that allowed by the platting ordinance. <= wish to ask for r a ) n exception for this enneth Jd. e Oo nrnencnceeneneeneece al} Me — “y RW “YW « Xe 0 EPReLH Aradle ~ Shor? Slat Kenton City Council 17/20//6 Page 4 Correspondence and Current Business Continued in Letter from Planning Director Ericksen reported Planning Comission ie Austin Co. recommendation for approval of rezone for the Austin Company from GS-] to M-P for 2.7 acres located on SW 16th St. between Powell Ave. SW and Thomas Ave. SW. for proposed office and warehouse, being in agreement with Comprehensive Plan. Letter from the Austin Company, C.R Wing, V-P and District Manager, filed appeal of the rezone to M-P rather than L-1 listing six reasons L-1 would be more economical and aesthetically desirable. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL SET DATE OF FEBRUARY 7, 1977 FOR MATTER OF HEARING ON APPEAL. Mr. Russ Brown, 7746 Overlake Dr., Bellevue, representing The Austin Company, asked Council to set been. ence earliest possible date. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, SUBSTITUTE MOTION, SET DATE OF JANUARY 24, 1977 FO : AND REFER CORRESPONDENCE TO THAT HEARING. SUBSTITUTE MOTTON CARRIED Exception to ‘Letter from Planning Director Ericksen reported Planning Commission Subdivision recommendation to grant an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance (Ord. Ordinance No. 3062 of 9/13/76) as requested by Emmett Kindle for property located Emmett Kindle in the vicinity of 2625 Jones Ave NE zoned G-7200 for use as single family residential. The letter explained the request to allow the use of pipestem lots exceeding the 150 ft. maximum depth allowed by 20 feet in order to allow reasonable development of the property and recommended granting of request. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. CARRIED. _ May Creek Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason presented proposed amendment Interceptor to the agreement with Water District 107 and Metro to provide for a change in the method of reimbursement and providing for a new estimate of the total amount of City participation. The letter explained the original agreement was dated 1/16/75 and since that time the consultant and the District have had to provide all the preliminary engineering financing for the development of the facilities plan. Further noting this agreement provides that the City would advance its share of the funds as the engineering work and construction progress, noting increase in scope of work. The letter estimated the total City cost will be approxi- mately $124,000 representing the City's 10% share of the interceptor project. The letter recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute this agreement, which has been approved by the City Attorney, and noted it is proposed to utilize the funding available from the 1975 Water & Sewer Bond Fund. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. Following considerable discussion, the Motion CARRIED. Solid Waste Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason brought attention to the solid waste collection contract with General Disposal which expires 5/1/77, noting a recently enacted state law enables the City to negotiate with the contractor for an extension of the agreement on a negotiated basis for a period of up to five years. The Public Works Director's letter explained meeting between staff of Public Works and Finance Departments and General Disposal in 11/76 at which time General Disposal requested negotiations be conducted in such a manner that when an agree- ment reached, a contract would be forthcoming; that in the event no agree- ment could be reached, their price quotations would remain confidential in order not to be at a disadvantage in the open competitive bid call. The Public Works Director's letter suggested a negotiation committee consisting of the Chairman of the City Council's Finance and Personnel Committee, Chairman of the Public Works Conmittee, the Mayor, Finance Director and the Public Works Director, with the power to bind the City. The letter noted negotiations should be consummated prior to 2/1/77 to allow sufficient time for a competitive bidding process, if required. Moved by Clymer, Seconded by Shinpoch, Council refer the matter to the Legislation Committee. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL REFER THE SOLID WASTE CONTRACT MATTER TO THE FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE TO REVIEW AND REPORT TO THE NEXT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE, (anticipating an executive session next Monday night.) CARRIED. > yrs 9 THE CITY OF RENTON a Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ee of - >) = iy 8 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR @ PLANNING DEPARTMENT a 235-2550 "4p en £0 sept December 22, 1976 Emmett Kindle 2625 Jones Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98055 RE: EMMETT KINDLE EXCEPTION AND SHORT PLAT Dear Mr. Kindle: The Renton City Council at its December 20, 1976, meeting concurred in the Planning Commission recommendation and approved your request for exception to the Renton Subdivi- sion Ordinance. This specifically refers to the proposed four-lot short plat as revised and received December 20, 1976, with two lots served by pipestems, each 20 feet wide and 170 feet in dept. This department has reviewed the revised four-lot short plat. Once the improvements are installed, the short plat can be signed by the necessary City departments and filed with King County. The Utility Division has also required at 15 foot utility easement along the west property line of the front lots for future sewer trunk line alignment. This should be added to the plat map original. If you have any further questions, please contact this department. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Senior Planner cc: ‘Building Div. Utility Div. Engineering Div. Ken Oyler MLS:wr Planning Department Staff Report Renton Planning Commission December 8, 1976 Page Seven APPLICANT: EMMETT KINDLE APPLICATION: EXCEPTION FROM SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO ALLOW 170 FOOT PIPESTEM AS A PORTION OF A THREE-LOT SHORT PLAT LOCATION: VICINITY OF 2625 JONES AVE. N.E. FINDINGS AND ; COMMENTS! 1. The applicant proposes to short plat the property into three lots. The larger rear lot (+one acre) is to be served by a pipestem access 20 feet wide and 120 feet long. The two smaller lots (90' x 170' and 78' x 170') front directly onto Jones Ave. N.E. 2. An existing single family residence is located on the northerly portion of the proposed rear lot. 3. The owner of the existing house intends to buy the rear lot and has asked whether it can be subdivided at a future point. This would require an additional pipestem to replace the existing easement to the existing house. We would recommend that this be accomplished at the present time and a four-lot short plat created. DECISION ; CONSIDERATIONS: Recommend approval of an alternative four-lot short plat (as per Exhibit B) with a second pipestem, a minimum 20 feet wide, located at the north side of the northerly lot fronting on Jones Ave. N.E. The proposed southerly pipestem should be shifted to the south © property line of the southerly lot fronting on Jones Ave. N.E. The width of the two front lots shall be adjusted to +74 feet each. The rear lot shall be subdivided approximately in half. ~ VM vu ‘1 ede Bee Moe { (a C3 ey cS (o e ) C> € b Gy m oO if ce bs | m | ~< — i@ AY io . raARnAnEr m4 nc nee aa: _ FOr I Lot its ae 77-17-76 Vv u [eae ais 4 a CR APPROVAL CONDITI ~ Swtis UR ny vu MOLTO nO Fue Comments. Ne ‘sigan thant teed. howe ts’ ubhty Basamnall repiind for, Sobor _Sanmlary Seweys , See plans Lic vars ._ PL A T T OR O C T O E AC C E S S > aa ’ LI M I T E D bb 7 7 AV E . ME A D O W Ba IN T E R S T A T E HW Y . 40 5 = OS ) ca e ae r a ye n i Se AC C E S S S& S hn h a h h k r k LI M I T E D — (NE. 27TH CT: ‘el « Ce 8? Ji, vw § m, {O----------i Wa ‘ N \ . | SI ae ~ Te BE ere NOP Z (pp PE L L E T 5 Le g h be t h hh hh h bb bt en —< — — -_ — — < hb ht h hh h ha k bh bb b b wi e i AV E . : | i i 3 5 aa ST, =\\ 1 hi -_ 1) 33}! “41 J SS) Nu} uy 7 \2 TTY os E 200° So! Ss: KR ’ & “ware ga go = 93 Gs= 4 ~ \ > 80 | Le Siahes 420-7 : ie @ ome ro ==--~33g- try > ay roe ENDING OF FILE