Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutShort Plat File No 34-77 / oe RP pro : “i 92 4 | ES AIS 27 BF ~ _ sia jzei- — 4 =i a ~ 7 : 76 [ IN C O L N AV E _ N InaRSRe AAC aRRRRRARPaeTSE Wh ATASRAASAARAAARERARSD ze is rar tt TH] ae Fy ears ‘ eA Th pl ETE! ie HEX fais ze ag) ABS [WOUELIESUEE?! aq man mi , Gly 120 FUGH PTRAEAPPORROUREGORER' © GO taper en 2 ~ Poe Term OOOOGHOE APPLICANT (7 o0R Dom M. WALKER TOTAL AREA O.US Access PRINCIPAL ACCES EXIS1tING ZONING S LAKE WASHINGTON BlyD. AN. - 72700 EXISTING USE RESIDENTIAL = Single Faraily PROPOSED USE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN RE S;/DENTIAL- Sis in lie PAMily COMMENTS RESIDENT/AL = Simi Family yor” - Ki ING COUNTY REC IRDS & ELE TIONS Restri, (Ue ovenant > UL TAY FEB-24-T7 90312 224397155 -- STOP STOP STOP’ STOP STOP! DOCUMENTS UNDER THIS NOTICE HAVE BEEN MICROFILMED. DO NOT REMOVE NOTICE FROM FILE. NEW FILING SHOULD BE ADDED ON TOP OF NOTICE. PAGES REMOVED UNDER THE NOTICE FOR COPYING MUST BE RETURNED TO THE SAME PLACE UNDER THE NOTICE. oT OP! STOP STOP STOP ' STOP BEGINNING e® Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING SS: eerniewatiecmenaete: betty. “Morris. oo... being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that S858 isthe... Chief. Clerk. of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King County, ; ° at Pawit i, F Washington. ThattheannexedisqOtlc® Of Public bearing ae 2b ae eka ma pearecRENE ee OR TESE as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period one SE assee sos aeetGppinnsg atom neu wsseseeS eae consecutive issues, commencing onthe 1 hori] | se exueweowes GAY Of s escssiscsvenncensmanmnecomemmomacnecen » 19 wereeeeneyand ending the sreiingasi NE DAY OF pcre cine nesnsenslacaniedinwerarerennnraieiiemanandeenaienadewwn nanny LO seseanny DOCHECATES inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of §........ -2 which has been paid in full at the rateof — per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and _ per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. Lk Lh bet hee... Chief Clerk ire Subscribed and sworn to before me this ..... First seanaaeNRETTeweeaae tian day of — Merdd 977. 4 ar ] A ye? 7 £e f Ze, hte LL Lita Ch OEE a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Kent, King County. — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955 — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State V.P.C. Form No. 87 Friday, April 1, 1977 Public Notices NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WA. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAM- BERS, CITY HALL, RE- NTON, WASHINGTON, ON APRIL 12, 1977, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE OF CEMETERY PROP- STOpESrty ateaq east O N.E. 3rd St. in vicinity of 100 Blaine Ave. N.E. between Blaine Ave. N.E. and powerline right- of-way. 2. SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT RE- TAIL SERVICE CENT- ER (CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES SALES SIMI- LAR TO LUMBER YARD) IN B-1 ZONE; File No. SP-037-77; property located at 1068 Sunset Blvd. N.E. 3. REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1; File No. R-035-77; property lo- cated at 1522 No. Brooks St. 4. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PROFESSIONAL CLINIC IN AN R-3 ZONE; File No. SP-036- 77; property located on southeast corner of Tal- bot Rd. S. and S.W. 43rd St. applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS TOSAID PETITIONS .... Legal descriptions of all Record-Chronic Public Notices ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 12, 1977 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EX- PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR Published in The Renton Record-Chronicle April 4. y ¢ 1977. R4272 e— 2 & G No 2994 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 CITY CLERK Department or Division Date March 8, 1977 T Please make checks Mr. Gordon M. Walker payable to 3701 Wells Ave. N. Finance Department Renton, Wash. 98055 City of Renton Declaration of Restrictive Covenants ( recording Fees ) $3.00 recording No. 7702240755 project No. SP-34-77 ( short Plat ) copies enclosed Total Due $3.00 & 0° Rey, ra A re & 3 THE CITY OF RENTON 7 = MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 3 oma be CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR © LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Op & JAMES L. MAGSTADT, 235-2593 7€0 sepve™ ( February 23, 1977 Mr. Gordon M. Walker RE: File No. E-002-77 3701 Wells Avenue North W-003-77 Renton, Washington 98055 #34-77 Short Plat Dear Mr. Walker: This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, which were approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of February 7, 1977, have not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Restrictive Covenants will be filed by the City Clerk with King County. Sincerely, ~“James/L. Hearing JLM:mg cc: Del Mead, City Clerk F 00 3 4 2 77 1 0 2 k 4 H 0 7 5 5 — AR Fe B - 24 - 7 7 a ae aa cy j wv o oY : DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS — es ™ = i? @5 -5 a a i. WHEREAS, (Gogpow M. \WAKER & bY 3’ are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner(s) of the above described property, their suc- cessors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree and covenant to participate in, sign a petition in support of, and accept any future Local Improvement District (LID) or city initia- ted proposal, and pay their fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. Said improve- ments shall include but may not be limited to the installa- tion of curbs, CHEESES 4 SOR) €S5 street paving s Sanitary sewers, storm sewers, undergraundt ng of utilities, and Street lighting. . “These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9-1105(6) of title IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton. ¢C. a .* a 2 ; RECEIVED FILED for pee at Request 0 CITY OF RENTON HEARING Exar ae OF THE ne CL BENCOS Na SRR AM JANG 1 O77 yl ae MILL AVE. SOUTH VSiMlO Iwi: r) aN Danie a 77 0 2 2 4 0 7 5 5 DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ) 7) + ‘ “ pore On this cmok bo AR day of Aaa », 19. - before me personally appeared Gornon M,\WALKER_, ‘ the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my officiai seal the day and year first above written. pe Ayn A %- Se ae Y Nan, % \ fy : Sw ” ef Poona } if Nhe Lk a ra a rage j otary Public in and for tife*Om@tey-, j of Washington, residing at \awosstas J oe ey \ gaye ‘\ "Mone a i” & Fe ry 7, 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT: Gordon M. Walker FILE NO. E-002-77 W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat LOCATION: Located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North, midway between North 36th Street and North 38th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a two lot short plat, a waiver of the off-site improvements and an exception to the platting ordinance for the development of a pipestem type lot. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval for requests on RECOMMENDATION: short plat and exception. Approval subject to conditions on waiver. Hearing Examiner: Approval on short plat. Approval subject to conditions on exception. Approval subject to conditions on waiver. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 31, 1977, at 10:20 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record by reference. Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director, entered the following exhibits: Exhibit 1: Assessor Map - location of parcel of land on Lake Washington Boulevard. Exhibit 2: G. M. Walker Short Subdivision Map, received by Planning Department on December 17, 1976. Exhibit 3: Letter from Public Works Director, dated January 28, 1977, re Waiver Application #W-003-77. Letter was read into the record by the Hearing Administrative Assistant, The Planning Director, Gordon Y. Ericksen, reviewed the Planning Department report. In regard to the letter from the Public Works Director recommending denial of the waiver, he indicated that approval of indefinite deferral was more acceptable than a waiver if the applicant would sign restrictive covenants. The Public Works Director, Warren C. Gonnason, noted that he recommended the waiver application be denied and that an indefinite deferral be granted subject to the applicant signing a restrictive covenant agreeing to participate in any future Local Improvement Districts. The applicant indicated that such restrictive covenants have been signed and sent to the city. E-002-77 Page Two W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat The Examiner entered Exhibit 4: Telephone conversation with Dick Houghton, Engineering Supervisor, which concurred with the Public Works letter and noted that the Engineering Department could not establish a grade for Lake Washington Boulevard at this time since the Boulevard may be widened or improved in the future. The Examiner asked for comments from the applicant, Mr. Walker. Mr. Walker responded that he had no comment. The Examiner asked for any comments in opposition or concurrence from the audience. There was no response. The Examiner directed questions to the applicant regarding the access road to the existing house located on the pipestem lot and noted that the present condition of the roadway is deeply rutted. The applicant responded that he had plans to gravel the roadway but not to regrade for the reason that only the front two lots, Lots A and B, would be utilizing the roadway. In response to the Examiner's question, the applicant indicated that the back lot was divided four years ago and has access by a 15' easement on the north property line. The Planning Director stated that with reference to the improvements that were mentioned by the applicant there were three potential problems: access to the pipestem lot, storm water runoff and improvements proposed. If the access road were used by other than one party, it would require improvement other than gravel and would require regrading and surfacing with a material such as asphalt. Mr. Walker responded that only Lots A and B would be utilizing the access, and regarding the storm water runoff, water had been running along the road for fifteen to twenty years. He also indicated that a ditch is located along the north side of the easement road. The hearing on Items E-002-77, W-003-77, and #34-77 Short Plat was closed by the Examiner at 10:40 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. Mr. Walker has an existing lot that is approximately 275' x 107' (approximately one-half acre) that he is proposing to short plat into two lots: Lot A, 10,650 square feet, and Lot B, 14,014 square feet. 2. In order to accomplish this proposed request, three procedures must be applied: 1) Short plat; 2) Exception to allow pipestem lot; and 3) Waiver from existing off-site improvements. 3. The original platting of this property and adjacent areas consisted of lots ranging in depth from 400 to 600 feet. This extreme depth caused hardships for future property owners to plat property into smaller lots conforming to the existing zoning of G-7200 and G-6000. 4. The topography on the property has a moderate slope of approximately 9%. 5. The residential character of the area consists of a variety of sizes of lots with the most recent platted lots consisting of approximately 7,000 to 9,000 square feet. 6. The short plat does not create any significant problems for the subject site or for adjacent properties. The proposed property division is one of the few alternatives available for subdivision. 7. Off-site improvements presently do not exist in the general area along Lake Washington Boulevard. E-002~-77 Page Three W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat FINDINGS: 8. The existing road providing access to Lot B is narrow, heavily rutted and in relatively poor condition. An existing open ditch lies directly north of the road and borders the northern property line. The northern 15 feet of the property also provides easement access rights to the existing platting lot directly east of Lot B. Mr. Walker owns this lot and the residence directly east of this property. Mr. Walker's residential access is from Wells Avenue North. CONCLUSIONS: Short Plat: 1. 2s The proposed lot division is compatible with the adjacent properties. The short plat also agrees with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Exception: le Waiver: The access to Lot B is accommodated by a pipestem consisting of an area 20' x 101'. This configuration agrees with the Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1108 23 F.(3)(d.), as amended, and Section 9-1109 (Exceptions). The ordinance also requires that all pipestems at least 20' wide shall not exceed 150' in length and shall consist of permanent paving 10' wide for the length of the pipestem. This ordinance also requires that the remaining portion of the pipestem not paved shall be landscaped. The Public Works Department has indicated that Lake Washington Boulevard is contemplated to be widened and redesigned in the near future. Final grades for this improvement have not been set or determined. The elevation of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks must be calculated from an existing grade usually determined at the center line of the right-of-way. The Public Works Department at this time is not able to present the applicant with the required information to establish grade and this work is not comtemplated in the 1977 department work schedule. The Public Works Director, Warren C. Gonnason, has recommended that the request for waiver of off-site improvements be denied. In lieu thereof, he recommends approval of an indefinite deferral of off-site improvements subject to the signing and filing of restrictive covenants in which the owner agrees to participate in an L.I.D. for such improvements at a future time. The Planning Department has concurred in this report. It can be assumed that an L.I.D. will eventually be created to provide these improvements at such time as Lake Washington Boulevard is widened or redesigned. Mr. Walker has submitted a Declaration of Restrictive Covenant document agreeing to participate in a future L.I.D. E-002-77 Page Four W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat RECOMMENDATION : Short Plat: Approval Exception: 1. Approval subject to grading and paving the existing pipestem to a 10 foot width, as per ordinance. 2. The remaining 20 foot area not paved shall accommodate storm drainage and is to be landscaped with landscaping to consist of vegetation natural to the area, as per ordinance. Waiver: Approval subject to recording the Declaration of Restrictive Covenant document with King County. ORDERED THIS 7th day of February, 1977. TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of February, 1977 by certified mail to the parties of record: Gordon M. Walker Shirley J. Post TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of February, 1977, to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071, Section 4-3015, request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before February 14, 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. THs CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL &UILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENT!, MAYOR @© PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 January 24, 1977 cxrdon M. Walker 3701 Wells Avenue North Renton, Washington 98055 APPLICATION FOR; EXCEPTION--#E-002-77; REGARDING: WAIVER--#W-003-77; AND SHORT PLAT-~#34-77 Dear Mr. Walker: Attached for your information is a copy of the Planning Department Staff Report regarding the abovementioned application. If you have any guestions, please contact this department. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Directon - aT 6a CO tect we Michael L. Smith Associate Planner MLS :ms Attachment PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 31, 1977 APPLICANT: GORDON M. WALKER FILE NO.: E-002-77-Exception/W-003-77-Waiver/34-77-Short Plat A, SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a two lot short plat, a waiver of the off-site improve- ments and an exception to the platting ordinance for the development of a pipestem type lot. B, GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: HILARY J. HOFFMAN 2. Applicant: Gordon M. Walker 3. Location: Located on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N., Midway between N. 36th St. and N. 38th St. 4. Legal Description: Tract 80, C.A. Hillmans Lake Wash Garden of Eden #2 Except East 225 Feet. 5. Size of Property: .7+ Acres 6. Access: Via Lake Washington Blvd. N. 7. Existing Zone: G-7200 (General Classification District) 8. Existing Zoning in Area: G-7200 & G-6000 (General Class- ification District) 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single family residential 10. Notification: The applicant was sent written notice of the hearing date. Notice was published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as per ordinance requirements. C, PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The purpose of the request is to allow a two lot short plat for sale and eventual development of single family residential lots. D, HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject property was part of a larger tract of land included in the orginal C.D. Hillman Lake Washington Garden of Eden subdivision. This orginal subdivision created long narrow tracts of land throughout the entire area. As these tracts were further subdivided on a piecemeal basis many problems have been created. ? @ PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JANUARY 31, 1977 PAGE TWO RE: GORDON M. WALKER APPLICATION NO. £-002-77-Exception/W-003077-Waiver/34-77-Short Plat E. PHYSICAL/BACKGROUND Ta Topography: The subject site has a moderate slope of 9%. Rising continually within the first 50', then gently leveling off with a steep incline bordering the eastern property line. Soils: Indianola Loam Fine Sand - Loamy fine sand, 4 to 15 % slopes. Permeability is rapid. Available water capacity is moderate. Run off is slow to medium, and the erosian hazard is slight to moderate. This soil is used for timber and urban development. Slight to moderate limitations for foundations and septic tank filter fields. Vegetation: The site consists primarily of thick under brush and grass with douglas fir and alder sparsely scattered throughout the site. Dense brush dominates the western portion with a proliferation of small trees within the eastern section. Wildlife: Brush and trees provide a habitat for birds (native to the area) and small mammals. Water: N/A Land Use: A single family residence presently exists on the easterly portion of the subject property (proposed lot B) together with a gar- age/storage structure. The westerly portion (lot A) is presently vacant and undeveloped. Single family residences surround the site and are the predominate form of land use within the general vicinity. Kennydale Beach Park is located near the site to the southwest. F, NEIGHBORHOUD CHARACTERISTICS: Land use and zoning in the area is single family residential with varying lot sizes and configurations. G. PUBLIC SERVICES: Ls Water and Sewer: An eight inch water main exists along Lake Washington Boulevard. Eight inch sewer mains exist along the south property line of the subject site and along Lake Washington Boulevard. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements. Transit: Metro Transit route #240 provides direct service running along Lake Washington Boulevard. H. APPLICABLE SECTIUNS UF THE ZONING CODE: Le a 4-729; "G" GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT 7200. 4-706; R-1 RESIDENCE SINGLE FAMILY. J. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: dhe Subdivision Ordinance; Section 9-1105 Section 9-1105.6.B, Waived Improvements Section 9-1108.F.(3), Lots (including pipestem) J. IMPACTS OF NATURAL SYSTEM: The Subject request will have minimal impacts on the natural system. PLANNING DEPARTMENI PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JANUARY 31, 1977 PAGE THREE RE: GORDON M. WALKER APPLICATION NO. E-002-77--Exception/W-003-77--Waiver/ 34-77--Short Plat K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: The subject request will have minimal social impacts. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 as amended (RCW 43.21C) the subject proposal is exempt from the threshold determination and EIS requirements. M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map is attached. . AGENCIES CONTACTED: fe | _— 1. City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of REnton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department All departments contacted regarding the application expressed no specific concerns. 0, DEPARIMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The area is zoned G-7200. The two lots created exceed the minimum 7200 square foot lot size. 2. The short plat as proposed will not create any significant problen for the subject site or adjacent properties, no other reasonable subdivision alternatives exist at the present time. 3. Access is provided for the adjacent lot to the east of the sub- ject site by Wells Avenue North and an easement over the northerly portion of the subject site. 4. Off-site improvements presently do not exist anywhere in the general area along Lake Washington Boulevard. » PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOM/ENDATION: 1. Short Plat: Recommend approval as proposed. _ UY 2. Exception (pipestem lot): Recommend approval as proposed. 3. Waiver Request: Recommend indefinite deferral subject to the signing of the standard restrictive covenants to run with the land agreeing to participate in an LID if one is formed for such purposes in the future. Attachment RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JAN 2 4 1977 7 PM ZB, lO MN 22,7 a 316 4 l 'h , ‘ a1 /Faflellalal S ts T aDOE at rn T 5 u { ‘a i 17 a] ‘ 1 H ne o Pelrtefsts [set] Et ; FS TH 2 ‘ XS : R “i ; Pit, I ; ae . Bibooemod 2 be i = nena on : a: = | ar EB TET mr, [- 44 } 1 a \ EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: GORDON M. WALKER; Appl. No. E-002-77 and W-003-77; request for exception to subdivision ordinance and application for waiver of off-site improve- ments for a two lot short plat; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard North. APPLICANT GORDON M. WALKER TOTAL AREA !0.68 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Lake Washington Boulevard North EXISTING ZONING G-7200 EXISTING USE Residential - Single Family PROPOSED USE Residential - Single Family COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Residential - Single Family COMMENTS fr (lse-res. codSoitnnsitlinaitinakn See ee ee ee ee PA R K AN E N. 35ST ST — [u n BU R N E T T AN E Al . ScALE-1"=Z00! SUBjEct swe [J GORDON WALKER, SHORT PLAT—ND. 34-17 EXCEpTION-~No.E-002.-77 WAIVER..— NOW-003-77 | ~ el x % CITY OF RENTON Ma OO] *GF ZF 4/-2032-77 SHORT PLAT FILE NO. MAJOR PLAT DATE REC'D Ajs#77-7E ___ TENTATIVE FEE_$ 3p. ____ PRELIMINARY RECEIPT NO. /g5o¥ ___ FINAL SM NO. PUD NO. IR ES OT nek sesc+ ) 7 APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7: he Plat Name & Location CG. AD. WKatieen (worr 7-7 37072 Ce WAry Btvp “, No. Lots 2 Total Acreage OC. § Zoning G7L0°e Owner GakLOW! NMA LU ALICE Phone fZd- $-4fOOS Address 270) Metis AVVe. Al, = KEWTOW 7 LOA AS A, Gg BOSS Engineer LEt//E 7/4 af Ore ete. Phone _Z$°$- SO¢$ © Address O. k30x 2258 MENIFO1S LO AS fof. 9 GOS S- Underground Utilities: : Yes No Not Installed Telephone —— e a Electric __ f —— Street Lights __ Pa — Natural Gas _ = —= TV Cable Sanitation & Water: [7 City Water /_/ Water District No. Sanitary Sewers Dry Sewers RN Y Septic Tanks Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance & LOis ded: i» db 2 ss DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING sirales PARKS 7 pW BUILDING phiol?7 HEALTH aa TRAFFIC ENG. helt? STATE HIGHWAY tf FIRE WRIEE COUNTY PLANNING i BD. PUBLIC’ WORKS OTHER Snape ACTION: SHORT PLAT approve /{¢i/77___ DENIED ee! 7-7 TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED TA Sie, P C ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: DATE DATE BOND NO. & TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept. Rev. 12/71 AFFIDAVIT Me hawy a. Y Varin Pll farce oe fAbh WA (< Kh. ied anes , being duly sworn, declare that I the owner of the property involved in this application and that the fect statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this PLL, day of VA Ly ,19 x, Y Notary Public in and for the er, of linn . : , residing at Duc fe y y AE / (Namé of Notary Pub (Signat / K PUD Pllog f 270A a4 vent fl : . LY : A ore’ Zoe Sb Lea. Le e” (Address) address) 4 ae RICHARD J. AHLES $ ay NOTARY PUBLIC — MINNESOTA LY 3} BENTON COUNTY , My Commission Expires Feb. 5, 1980 F CIMA 7 SaerereeeerereeOOOOIPIOODOOOODee em: ro! foley (State) — — “oJ DEIP-IPBFPE (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to~bé-thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the ruleg)\an regu ations of the Renton Planning Department governing the fi ROS FIED inated: plication. fs, 1S) Date Received Renton Planning Dept. 2=73 a a CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON i/ On, ‘ao ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEET (ola 9) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: yy, sy 77 \ a “ Off Application No. #~¢4 -/%9- 77 Negative Dec. SEPARTW Date Received 42-17-77 EIS INSTRUCTIONS: The purpose of this information is to assist the vari- ous departments of the City to determine whether an environmental impact statement will be required before approving and issuing a per- mit for a proposed project. Single family residential uses in non sensitive areas are exempt from this requirement as established by Washington Administrative Code 173-34. In addition to the following information, please submit a vicinity map (recommend scale: 1" representing 200' to 800‘) and a site map (rec- ommended scale: 1" representing 10' to 40'). APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 30 BELOW: 1. Name of applicant G0 hvOrw 4 0 pejcete. 2. Mailing address 3270O/ Wee /pur. h/ Cats72 LL ASA GBOLL Telephone fAl~ $ -YOOS” 3. Applicant is: [ lowner {(_jLessee CeF¥Contract purchaser (_J0ther (specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any Or nearest street and intersection 2700 Ce Wasi Bevin py 10. did - 2 = Legal description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) Tithe, 0,00 lhecwAtS CA%6g WAgT CA) OF Evel 4C Excepr EAST 21 feer, Yo Ta pear Aeconvey /- bor 1 Of AAS, Pree 64 Area 0.7 fe Dimensions tHE K/OAE T Intended use of property or project (include details: number of units, volume, etc.): 2~ fave iti OCni7s Generally describe the property and existing improvements: Oniperptiven FLopen7y fi | Mouse Total construction cost or fair market value of proposed project including additional developments contemplated: Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested Begin End 12s 13. 14. ies 16 « List any other permits for this project from state, federal, or other local governmental agencies for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the applica- tion, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and the number of the application or permit: Date Agency Permit Type Submitted* Number Status** * Leave blank if not submitted. ** Approved, denied or pending. Has an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assess- ment been prepared for the proposed project? If "yes" submit copy with this yes [-fno environmental impact worksheet. Are there similar projects, both public and private, existing or planned in the immediate area: yes | [no oe: know If "yes" explain. Is the proposed project located in or adjacent to an area or structure having unique or exceptional historic, cultural, or other values considered important by some sectors of the popu- lation? yes [4 no If "yes" explain. Is the proposed project located in an area that may be considered sensitive and is subject to erosion, landslides, floods, etc.? yes [4 no If "yes" exptain. 17. Is the proposed project located in an area that has a number of large trees or other natural landscaped areas, waterways, marshes or wildlife? yes [ -| no If "yes" explain. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT: In the following questions Summarize what the applicant feels will be the environmental impact, both beneficial and adverse, of the proposed project. Consideration should be given to both the human and natural environmental as well as physical, social, and aesthetic aspect. For projects which are part of a more extensive plan, consider the implications of the entire plan and not just the project now being proposed. 18. 19» 20. Land Use: Will the project have a significant effect on land use in the surrounding area? | |ves | <|no Explain: Project Design and Appearance: Will the project design, appear- ance, landscaping, etc., assure the maximum protection for the natural environment? “yes |_| no Explain: Ground Contours: Does the proposed project have an effect on the existing ground contours of the project location? yes -7no. Is the project likely to cause erosion or sedimentation? [yes [_ qn? If "yes" to either, explain. 21.. aL a 24. Air Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project have a substantial effect on the existing air quality? (Consider the effect of any gas, chemicals, smoke, dust, particulate matter, and odors)? yes “Ino If "yes" explain. Water Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project be likely to have an effect on the existing water quality of the area? (Consider the adequacy of drainage and runoff and the likely endpoint of any liquids draining from the project.) [_lyes [7]no. Is there a good possibility that this project will _require_an expansion of local water and/or sewer facilities? |_|yes rind If "yes" to either, explain. Noise: Will construction of the project or use of the completed project significantly affect the existing noise levels of the area? yes mt Will the project be affected by airports, freeways, railroads or other sources of noise? yes [/]|no If "yes" to either, explain. Population Density: Will a noticeable population change result from this project? (Consider the present density per acre in the surrounding community to the proposed density of the project and including daytime density.) yes [7]no. Will the pro- ject cause periodic or temporary uctuations in population due to tourism, employment, shopping, schools, etc. Pe Lejno. If "yes" to either, explain. 25 « EO. ro ~ F 28. 29. Effect on Population: Will the proposed action directly or in- directly cause the relocation of a sizeable number of persons or the division or disruption of existing community patterns of liv- ing? [ lyes [no If "yes" explain. Schools and Parks: Will the proposed project have an effect on schools and parks in the area? yes | |no If "yes" explain. Transportation: Will construction of the project or use of the completed project have a significant impact on transportation in the area? lI yes [| no Explain: Public Use: Will the project be available for use by all sectors of the public? yes | -}no Explain: Fort Frivarve DeceturGs On~27 Other Impacts: Identify any other beneficial or adverse environ- mental impacts which may result from the construction or comple- tion of the proposed project. ALOps & 30. VIEWS OF LOCAL GROUPS: Have you made your plans known to interested community groups or neighbors in the vicinity of the project? [ lyes 7 Jno If "yes" what are their reactions? If "no" do you intend to contact these people?|_ yes [7]no CERTIFICATION BY OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE The Owner/Representative identified in Item No. 1 or 4 above hereby certifies that the information furnished in this Environmental Work- sheet is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge. Signature Title Date TO BE FILLED IN BY CITY DEPARTMENTS REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: ores Comments: fd SY2U0 (fl CHAS TAA BPO hve £ F KLbov, ct \ pli2 (22 Signature of ey Authorized Representative Date / REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: ThREEC ENGIN EEE/ NE Comments: Wo Spiifesut Tnpock ALE. LEA EY aot) Ve 3/77 Signature of Director or Auth@rized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: ¢ “> . Department: fs OUI. Comments: F 4 = : PIe> gZ EP e 4] Can ( - etsy “cee 4 LY € Er — Tis (EZwItE? fehl oS Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Of fitics Comments: KPa L on pot i wil ¢ fe 3 ad CANA tury Nsateh@ P Roy fy & = Pan Signature of Director or Authorized Representative fpf > ate « 1 = ACTION BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL A. Staff review determined that project: Has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. May have significant environmental impact and a complete environmental assessment should be prepared by applicant prior to further action on request for permit. B. Reasons for above conclusion: Signature of Responsible Official or Authorized Representative Date: Form: EIS-1 Planning Department October 15, 1973 KENNETH J. OYLER CIVIL ENGINEER & LAND SURVEYOR P.O. Box 2258 « Renton, Wa 98055 255-5050 Dec. 16, 1976 Planning Commission, Silty of Renton me: Proposed short plat of %.M. Walker Tith the submission of this short plat , a waiver of +1, one oh ae aay Al ty on Eu 4 Hay PCE cee ApS yaa impravewents" aud an exception to the olatting ordinance requeste<.. Kenneth Alay ine ae ; ULiew OL 5 ealne @ 1S celng THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENT!, MAYOR @ PLANNING DEPARTMENT “4 - C &% 3 % 235-2550 : G F %& € 19 9 , NO "ED sepie™ January 18, 1977 Gordon M. Walker 3701 Wells Avenue North Renton, WA 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR Applications for Exception to Subdivision Ordinance and Waiver of Off-site Improvements Files No. E-002-77 and No. W-003-77 Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 13, 1977 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for January 31, 1977 _ Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre- sent. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director Associate Planner wr NOTE OF PUPP TEAR TAG RENTON LAND USL HLAKING EXAMINE K RENTON, WASHINGTON \ PUBLIC© HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMENER hi WLS REGULAR MELTING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CLLY HALL, RENTON, WASHENGTON, ON JANUARY 31 , 1977. , Al 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER iil FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1; file No. R-001-773 property located on Sunset Boulevard between N.E. 12th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. 2. EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; file No. E-002-77; property located in the vicinity of 3/702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. x 3. | WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-003-77; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. “A. REZONE FROM S-1 TO SR-1; file No. R-004-77; property located at 807 Union Avenue N.E. 5. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-006-77; property located on Jones Avenue N.E. and N.E. 44th Street. Legal descriptions of all applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. tt OTNTERESTED PERSONS TO SAED PEEP TIONS ART TAY ITED PO be PRE Stat Ad oH PURE TO HEARING On JANUARY SIL, LOSS Ar uso ALT. 10 Py PRESS THETR OPINIONS. | GORDON Y. ERLCKSEN PUBLISHED January 21, 1977. RENTON PLATINING BERECTOR CERTIFICATION 1, MICHAEL L. SMITH g,:*HEREBY CERTIVY THAT THREE COPIES Of THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW, ATTESTS Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, ft ff} on the \@ day of Nanuacy a, “ /) : stones fe. 4d sit. | ‘ M-—} 4 Vbawral AAAS ee VX i (4 = WN : Oy Ve Le INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST 10: iy PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 4 BUILDING DIVISION _ ENGINEERING DIVISION UV TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION J / UTILITIES DIVISION - FIRE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT NMiCHAEL Suit Contact Person RE: oy JIALK Ise « TT AHO _-7 ecpppicnd (o2. E-be2 “ZL, dead (DA Visf. (W0.L0- 00% 1) Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal and return it to the Planning Department by NTA, LS L477 with your written recommendation. Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. Thank you, PLANNING DEPARTMENT STOP STOP STOP’ STOP S TOP! DOCUMENTS ONDER THIS NOTICE HAVE BEEN MICROFILMED. DO NOT REMOVE NOTICE FROM FILE. NEW FILING SHOULD BE ADDED ON TOP OF NOTICE, PAGES REMOVED UNDER THE NOTICE FOR COPYING MUST BE RETURNED TO THE SAME PLACE UNDER THE NOTICE. o1 OP STOP STOP STOP STOP Fek ary 7, 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT: Gordon M. Walker FILE NO, E-002-77 W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat LOCATION: Located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North, midway between North 36th Street and North 38th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a two lot short plat, a waiver of the off-site improvements and an exception to the platting ordinance for the development of a pipestem type lot. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval for requests on RECOMMENDATION: short plat and exception. Approval subject to conditions on waiver. Hearing Examiner: Approval on short plat. Approval subject to conditions on exception. Approval subject to conditions on waiver. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 31, 1977, at 10:20 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record by reference, Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director, entered the following exhibits: Exhibit 1: Assessor Map - location of parcel of land on Lake Washington Boulevard. Exhibit 2: G. M. Walker Short Subdivision Map, received by Planning Department on December 17, 1976. Exhibit 3: Letter from Public Works Director, dated January 28, 1977, re Waiver Application #W-003-77. Letter was read into the record by the Hearing Administrative Assistant. The Planning Director, Gordon Y. Ericksen, reviewed the Planning Department report. In regard to the letter from the Public Works Director recommending denial of the waiver, he indicated that approval of indefinite deferral was more acceptable than a waiver if the applicant would sign restrictive covenants. The Public Works Director, Warren C. Gonnason, noted that he recommended the waiver application be denied and that an indefinite deferral be granted subject to the applicant signing a restrictive covenant agreeing to participate in any future Local Improvement Districts. The applicant indicated that such restrictive covenants have been signed and sent to the city. E-002-77 Page Two W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat The Examiner entered Exhibit 4: Telephone conversation with Dick Houghton, Engineering Supervisor, which concurred with the Public Works letter and noted that the Engineering Department could not establish a grade for Lake Washington Boulevard at this time since the Boulevard may be widened or improved in the future. The Examiner asked for comments from the applicant, Mr. Walker. Mr. Walker responded that he had no comment. The Examiner asked for any comments in opposition or concurrence from the audience, There was no response. The Examiner directed questions to the applicant regarding the access road to the existing house located on the pipestem lot and noted that the present condition of the roadway is deeply rutted. The applicant responded that he had plans to gravel the roadway but not to regrade for the reason that only the front two lots, Lots A and B, would be utilizing the roadway. In response to the Examiner's question, the applicant indicated that the back lot was divided four years ago and has access by a 15' easement on the north property line. The Planning Director stated that with reference to the improvements that were mentioned by the applicant there were three potential problems: access to the pipestem lot, storm water runoff and improvements proposed. If the access road were used by other than one party, it would require improvement other than gravel and would require regrading and surfacing with a material such as asphalt. Mr. Walker responded that only Lots A and B would be utilizing the access, and regarding the storm water runoff, water had been running along the road for fifteen to twenty years. He also indicated that a ditch is located along the north side of the easement road. The hearing on Items E-002-77, W-003-77, and #34-77 Short Plat was closed by the Examiner at 10:40 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. Mr. Walker has an existing lot that is approximately 275' x 107' (approximately one-half acre) that he is proposing to short plat into two lots: Lot A, 10,650 square feet, and Lot B, 14,014 square feet. 2. In order to accomplish this proposed request, three procedures must be applied: 1) Short plat; 2) Exception to allow pipestem lot; and 3) Waiver from existing off-site improvements. 3. The original platting of this property and adjacent areas consisted of lots ranging in depth from 400 to 600 feet. This extreme depth caused hardships for future property owners to plat property into smaller lots conforming to the existing zoning of G-7200 and G-6000. 4. The topography on the property has a moderate slope of approximately 93%. 5. The residential character of the area consists of a variety of sizes of lots with the most recent platted lots consisting of approximately 7,000 to 9,000 square feet. 6. The short plat does not create any significant problems for the subject site or for adjacent properties. The proposed property division is one of the few alternatives available for subdivision. 7. Off-site improvements presently do not exist in the general area along Lake Washington Boulevard. E-002-77 Page Three W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat FINDINGS: 8. The existing road providing access to Lot B is narrow, heavily rutted and in relatively poor condition. An existing open ditch lies directly north of the road and borders the northern property line. The northern 15 feet of the property also provides easement access rights to the existing platting lot directly east of Lot B. Mr. Walker owns this lot and the residence directly east of this property. Mr. Walker's residential access is from Wells Avenue North. CONCLUSIONS: Short Plat: 1. The proposed lot division is compatible with the adjacent properties. The short plat also agrees with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Exception: Le Waiver: Lie The access to Lot B is accommodated by a pipestem consisting of an area 20' x 101'. This configuration agrees with the Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1108 23 F.(3)(d.), as amended, and Section 9-1109 (Exceptions). The ordinance also requires that all pipestems at least 20' wide shall not exceed 150' in length and shall consist of permanent paving 10' wide for the length of the pipestem. This ordinance also requires that the remaining portion of the pipestem not paved shall be landscaped. The Public Works Department has indicated that Lake Washington Boulevard is contemplated to be widened and redesigned in the near future. Final grades for this improvement have not been set or determined. The elevation of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks must be calculated from an existing grade usually determined at the center line of the right-of-way. The Public Works Department at this time is not able to present the applicant with the required information to establish grade and this work is not comtemplated in the 1977 department work schedule. The Public Works Director, Warren C. Gonnason, has recommended that the request for waiver of off-site improvements be denied. In lieu thereof, he recommends approval of an indefinite deferral of off-site improvements subject to the signing and filing of restrictive covenants in which the owner agrees to participate in an L.I.D. for such improvements at a future time. The Planning Department has concurred in this report. It can be assumed that an L.I.D. will eventually be created to provide these improvements at such time as Lake Washington Boulevard is widened or redesigned. Mr. Walker has submitted a Declaration of Restrictive Covenant document agreeing to participate in a future L.I.D. E-002-77 Page Four W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat RECOMMENDATION: Short Plat: Approval Exception: 1. Approval subject to grading and paving the existing pipestem to a 10 foot width, as per ordinance, 2. The remaining 20 foot area not paved shall accommodate storm drainage and is to be landscaped with landscaping to consist of vegetation natural to the area, as per ordinance. Waiver: Approval subject to recording the Declaration of Restrictive Covenant document with King County. ORDERED THIS 7th day of February, 1977. TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of February, 1977 by certified mail to the parties of record: Gordon M. Walker Shirley J. Post TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of February, 1977, to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071, Section 4-3015, request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before February 14, 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. TH 3 CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL «UILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. $8055 CHARLES J. DELAURENT!, MAYOR @ PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 January 24, 1977 Gordon M. Walker 3701 Wells Avenue North Renton, Washington 98055 APPLICATION FOR; ,/ EXCEPTION--#E-002-77; REGARDING: WAIVER--#W-003-77; AND SHORT PLAT--234-77 Dear Mr. Walker: Attached for your information is a copy of the Planning Department Staff Report regarding the abovementioned application. If you have any questions, please contact this department. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Dixrecton - Ze oi Facil = 6K ela & Ltect~e Michael L. Smith Associate Planner MLS :ms Attachment as > & x & . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2 wT 3 WARREN C. GONNASON, P.E. e DIRECTOR 3 precrmas Ee MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 - 206 235-2569 TED sepie™ CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR January 28.,° 1977 TO? JAMES L. MAGSTADT Hearing Examiner FROM: WARREN C. GONNASON Public Works Director RE: WAIVER APPLICATION #W-003-77 Gordon M. Walker It is the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the request for waiver of off-site improvements be denied. In lieu thereof, we recommend the approval of an indefinite deferral of the off-site improvements subject to the signing and filing of restrictive covenants in which the owner agrees to participate in an LID for such improvements at a future date. 3 YC Larreser— WCG:cah cc: Planning Department Building Division RECEIVED Engineering Division CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JAN 3.11977 AM 78,90 M211 1213141516 tu hithis ey i E-bo ZX - a7 W 2009-77. %, AH By-77 OA. Fe. > & ry Sy ‘J PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2 3 WARREN C. GONNASON, P.E. @ DIRECTOR 3, bre = MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 - 206 235-2569 a re) Sa A & TED sepre™ CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR January 28, 1977 TO: JAMES L. MAGSTADT Hearing Examiner FROM: WARREN C. GONNASON Public Works Director RE: WAIVER APPLICATION #W-003-77 Gordon M. Walker It is the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the request for waiver of off-site improvements be denied. In lieu thereof, we recommend the approval of an indefinite deferral of the off-site improvements subject to the signing and filing of restrictive covenants in which the owner agrees to participate in an LID for such improvements at a future date. WCG:cah cc: Planning Department Building Division Engineering Division January 31, 1977 SUBJECT: Telephone Conversation, January 31, 1977, with Dick Houghton, Engineering Supervisor, regarding Memorandum dated January 28, 1977, to James L. Magstadt from Warren C. Gonnason, re Waiver Application #W-003-77, Gordon M. Walker The final grade for the future widening of Lake Washington Boulevard has not been determined. This grade will determine the street width and the location of curbs on the perimeter of the street section. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Ey A ipa &. AM JAN 3 1 1977 ” FS, D021 21314:5.6 4 Gerden wa ther NOTE) OF PHBE EC TEAK TAG RENTON LAND USE HLAKING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING | XAMENER AL WIS REGULAR MELTING IN THE COUNCITE CHAMBERS, CTILY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 31 » 1977. , Al 9:00 ALM. TO CONSIDER (Hl LOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1; file No. R-O01-773; property located on Sunset Boulevard between N.E. 12th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. 2. EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; file No. E-002-77; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. ¥ 3. | WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-003-77; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. “4, REZONE FROM S-1 TO SR-1; file No. R-004-77; property located at 807 Union Avenue N.E. 5. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-006-77; property located on Jones Avenue N.E. and N.E. 44th Street. Legal descriptions of all applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALT INTERESTED PERSONS TO SATD PEETTIONS ARE INVITED PO BE PRESERE Al i PURE TC HLARING ON JANUARY 31, L97/ Ai 9:00 ALA. 10 L¥PRIOS THEIR OPINIONS. . GORDON Y. ERECKSEN PUBLISHED = January 21, 1977... RENTON PLANNING BIRECTOR CERTIFICATION l, MICHAEL L. SMITH ~~ ———,:s«OHEREBY CERTIVY THAT THREE COPTES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUGUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, AA on the \@ day of Nanusey_. a, — i? ae : f SIGNED / Le GOL { \ a v oy, . \ ‘\ { oy YU ‘a \\\: Oy Ale KENNETH J. OYLER CiViltL ENGINEER & LAND SURVEYOR P.O. Box 2258 e¢ Renton, Wa 98055 255-5050 Dec. 16, 1976 Planning Commission, Sity of Renton Re: Proposed short plat of G.M. Walker With the submission of this short plat , a waiver of the "Off- Site Improveaents" and an exception to the olatting ordinance is bein requestec. CITY OF RENTON PLAT APPLICATION S f Lf Os? A * snort PLAT GS AlCl My © ©\ Eee WO. “ pd ae CE GP val aS Me ___MAJOR PLAT DEC L> joo } DATE REC'D Sis PAG HC ___ TENTATIVE ie a FEE__$ “3p. ____ PRELIMINARY ee RECEIPT NO. /75 0<~ ___ FINAL SM NO. PUD NO. CPrseisS?s £8 hy Mien pire ONE Ma pit LOGas ) = 7 APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7: Ls Plat Name & Location CG. Ad. Whaercet (yrorr Jet Bie. 37072 Ce WASy Etvp pw. No. Lots. ~~ @&_ Total Acreage O.G 8 Zoning G7ioee Owner Ce i S/S LKE. Phone fd- $-FO0OS Address 270 L Mees (“Wwe pA) - fewrow, WAL GF BOSS Engineer LE: Mh Ftd Sf Orc ESL Phone_2$7s S$Og oO Address £0. Box 2758 (fBwroy has. F IOS 6 Underground Utilities: : Yes No Not Installed Telephone _ ft _ Electric a _ Street Lights __ 7 _ Natural Gas __ > _ TV Cable ——— Sanitation & Water: /v7 City Water /_/ Water District No. Sanitary Sewers Dry Sewers Septic Tanks RN Y Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING iolr2 PARKS BUILDING tfle/a2 HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. ‘ifeela STATE HIGHWAY FIRE ofo2” COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER STAFF ACTION: _Ssuorr PLAT APPROVED Ltt/22 DENIED ___TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED J EXPIRED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: DATE DATE BOND NO. & TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept. Rev. 12/71 ¥ AFFIDAVIT Milany Joo 4 Waren. T tlaghfpsarcre’ ¢ ry A AREY «i Hd « CC wy , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and SWOr? before me this IA say of. Mey ’ Nae Notary Pub 1s in and id the Stat Washington, + sesi@ine LLL LL. vy. (Name of Notary: Public) Sigatyyet seed. Ownet ¥ Vek T ei vet Ko bbb AE So focszz pac, 7 Address) 7 (Address) CORES by ste sa RICHARD J. AHLES Bh NOTARY PUBLIC — MINNESOTA ' BENTON COUNTY j Ji My Commission Expires Feb. 5, 1980 ¢ fo 2Od00 9 8 OCOOP OG — cehaiaatateiniaiaiaidiialaiiuial (Cltyy (State) ZS IA- GSFC (Telephone) ) OF FICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me 1as been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to rm to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department ning the fipteg on Sieh application. fics cre Ey ah, \ 2eceived ic ; ay 19 By: A \ J aS, y “vy < oY . Renton Planning Dept. 7 ING perry” 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON f De. a ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEET |=” fs a ey FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: \S. me af Application No. <vU/-/77- 77___Negative Dec. SREPARTE” Date Received CR -79-FE EIS INSTRUCTIONS: The purpose of this information is to assist the vari- Ous departments of tne City to determine whether an environmental impact statement will be required before approving and issuing a per~ mit for a proposed project. Single family residential uses in non sensitive areas are exempt from this requirement as established by Washington Administrative Code 173-34. In addition to the following information, please submit a vicinity map (recommend scale: 1" representing 200' to 800') and a site map (rec- ommended scale: 1" representing 10' to 46'). APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 30 BELOW: 1. Name of applicant CGO hVO~ 4 © pel/een. 2. Mailing address «e/7O/ CUezes Sus. [CatoT2 2 LONGO G3OLL Telephone fh b~ $ BOOS 3. Applicant’ is: [lowner {(_jiLessee Ce¥Contract purchaser (_JOther (specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any Or nearest street and intersection 2700 Ce wns Bevin py 103 ll. ao Bm Legal description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) Tit; 80,0. 0 lheecktArtt CAKE WAGT CAE) OF Foe 4a Excep7z EAT Zin Keer, Yo Te pear Leconvey / Yo. 1 Or AAS, Paee 6F Area 0.7 Ne Dimensions tS K/SODE 7 Intended use of property or project (include details: number of units, volume, etc.): 2 fase te GCr'N7S Generally describe the property and existing improvements: O mt -4 LOVED F207 Y / / Mouse Total construction cost or fair market value of proposed project including additional developments contemplated: Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested Begin End Les Lo 14, LBs 16. List any other permits for this project from state, federal, or other local governmental agencies for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the applica- tion, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and the number of the application or permit: , Date Agency Permit Type Submitted* Number Status** * Leave blank if not submitted. ** Approved, denied cr pending. Has an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assess- ment been prepared for the pronosed project? Stan If “yes" submit copy with this vee [ “Fro environmental impact worksheet. Are there similar projects, both public and private, existing or planned in the immediate area: yes | “{no don't know If "yes" explain. Is the proposed project located in or adjacent to an area or structure having unique or exceptional historic, cultural, or other values considered important by some sectors of the popu- lation? [ | yes [4 no If "yes" explain. Is the nronosed project located in an area that ma sensitive and is subject to erosion, landslides, f ves ns Hf "yo5” eatatn th e 17. Is the proposed project located in an area that has a number of large trees or other natural landscaped areas, waterways, marshes or wildlife? yes [ | no If "yes" explain. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT: In the following questions summarize what the applicant feels will be the environmental impact, both beneficial and adverse, of the proposed project. Consideration should be given to both the human and natural environmental as well as physical, social, and aesthetic aspect. For projects which are part of a more extensive plan, consider the implications of the entire plan and not just the project now being proposed. 18. Land Use: Will the project have a significant effect on land usé in the surrounding area? [|yes | <|no Explain: 19. Project Design and Appearance: Will the project design, appear- ance, landscaping, etc., assure the maximum protection for the natural environment? yes | [no Explain: q 20. Ground Contours: Does the proposed project have an eriact on the existing ground contours of the project iccatiun? - | _|yes -j7no. Is the project likely to cause erosion or sedimentation? [_]yes [_ no? If "yes" to either, explain. ae rf ae 24. Air Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project have a substantial effect on the existing air quality? (Consider the effect of any gas, chemicals, smoke, dust, particulate matter, and odors)? L_lyes “Ino | If "yes" explain. Water Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project be likely to have an effect on the existing water quality of the area? (Consider the adequacy of drainage and runoff and the likely endpoint of any liquids draining from the project.) [_lyes [*]no. Is there a good possibility that this project wil] require _an expansion of local water and/or sewer facilities? | lyes [@|no If "yes" to etther, explain. Noise: Will construction of the project or use ef the completed project significantly affect the existing noise ievels of the area? yes no. Will the project be affected by airports, freeways, railroads or other sources of noise? yes [/]no If "yes" to either, explain. Population Density: Will a noticeable population change result from this project? (Consider the present density per acre in the surrounding community to the proposed density of the project and including daytime density.) yes [7]no. Will tne pro- ject cause periodic or temporary uctuations in population due to tourism, employment, shopping, schools, etc. [ ,yes [ejno. If "yes" to either, explain. oo eG. eS ao . Effect on Population: Will the proposed action directly or in- directly cause the relocation of a sizeable number of persons or the division or disruption of existing community patterns of liv- ing? [ lyes [no If “yes" explain. Schools and Parks: Will the proposed project have an effect on schools and parks in the area? yes I |no If "yes" explain. Transportation: Will construction of the project or use of the completed project have a significant impact on transportation in the area? Th ves Ge Explain: Public Use: Will the project be available ior use by all sectors of the public? |_lyes | -}no Explain: Fora Frivarve DeceturGs Omer Other Impacts: Identify any other beneficial or adverse environ- mental impacts which may result from the construction or comple- tion of the proposed project. ALO e 30. VIEWS OF LOCAL GROUPS: Have you made your plans known to interested community groups or neighbors in the vicinity of the project? [yes [7 no If "yes" what are their reactions? a . - —~y ral If "no" do you intend to contact these people? |jyes [- no CERTIFICATION BY OWNER/REPRESENTAT IVE The Cwner/Representative identified in Item No. 1 or 4 above hereby certifies that the information furnished in this Environmental Work- sheet is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge. Signature Title Date TO BE FILLED [IN BY CITY DEPARTMENTS REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: BLY i Comments: re Bm ie " ah 9 7 ‘f € | 7 2 *: yee ) OP 2 aa 2 C ; | -- fet fe? 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Ut 4 Comments: N rored Ey. Wate tas Au 4 [. AY VIELE Signature of Director or Authorized xepresentative “Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: 7 CALEK. EMGCGINEER[WG Comments: NO S igachice wh Lacfect Wits FE Tirvrn... alr7 Signature of Director or suEnanyees Representative ‘Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Comments: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date. - 10 - ACTION BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL A. Staff review determined that project: Has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. May have significant environmental impact an a complete environmental assessment should be prepared »y applicant prior to further action on request for permit. B. Reasons for above conclusion: Signature of Responsible Official or Authorized Representacive Date; Form: E{S-1 Planning Cepartment October 15, 14/73 Gordon M. Walker January 18, a ’ fo) THE CITY OF RENTON hal Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ame ( ee s CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR @ PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 Lg77 3701 Wells Avenue North Renton, WA 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR Applications for Exception to Subdivision Ordinance and Waiver of Off-site Improvements Files No. E-002-77 and No. W-003-77 Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 13, 1977 _. A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for January 31, 1977 _ Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre- sent. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director (A. MLL: tp ss hael . Smith Associate Planner wr Gorden LIilker NOU OF PURE TC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON \ PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Al WIS REGULAR MELTING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 31... +4 1977. , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER iL |! OLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1; file No. R-001-77; property located on Sunset Boulevard between N.E. 12th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. 2. EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; file No. E-002-77; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. ¥ 3. | WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-003-77; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. 4. REZONE FROM S-1 TO SR-1; file No. R-004-77; property located at 807 Union Avenue N.E. 5. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-006-773; property located on Jones Avenue N.E. and N.E. 44th Street. Legal descriptions of all applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. All INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARLE INVITED TO BE PRESENT Aq PHE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 31, 1977 Al 9:00 ALM. 10 LAPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. . GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED January 21, 1977. RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, MICHAEL L. SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTFD BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, on t nh e \¢ d ay O f va Wo f of ° 7 S; f 19 Tt. t SIGNED /fe { H “A \ b dou ae - & nie mh ak NY ¢ AVX Yuk | ‘ie ‘ Ny Nhe MN LX = Atti of Publication = 6 =) a SPATE or vas Yor . COUNTY - 28: S4N ral — cseststussststtisveevetacctvenstsreenstl edladivamartaianumates being first duly swornon oath, deposes and says that ....... “isthe ...... ee eee ene —_——e of CHE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) lines a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained aut the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit, King County, Washington. That the annexedisa SAS fe] ' . . . Sue ition OF er iromhoaitee aie as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period BE nc geotince vase ise memedeempramiewendeseen consecutive issues, commencing on the ie ~ ej . sions ee TOY: OW seuncaninsaasmaataeh ts tsmeamereansaeas 5 eo ecdteouns and ending the pmtiog ay Of oo. ciccecseteeeeceeeensesesesstssesssssseseseseseeseey 19.,......, DOth dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $2 es es which has been paid in fullatthe rateof per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and f per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. Notary Public ‘aka for. a. Slate of oe on, residing at Kent, King County. —— Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. —~ Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 31, 1977, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1; file No. R- 001-77; property located on Sunset Boulevard between N.E. 12th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. 2. EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; file No. Ce-v02-2doropert Stated in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. 3. WAIVER OF OFF- SITE IMPROVE- MENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-003-77; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. 4. REZONE FROM S-1 TO SR-1; file No. R- 004-77; property located at 807 Union Avenue N.E. 5. WAIVER OF OFF- SITE IMPROVE- MENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-006-77; property located on Jones Avenue N.E. and N.E. 44th Street. Legal descriptions of all applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 31, 1977, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR Published in The Renton Record-Chronicle January 21, 1977. R4142 Fel ary 7, 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT: Gordon M. Walker FILE NO. E-002-77 W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat LOCATION: Located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North, midway between North 36th Street and North 38th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a two lot short plat, a waiver of the off-site improvements and an exception to the platting ordinance for the development of a pipestem type lot. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval for requests on RECOMMENDATION: short plat and exception. Approval subject to conditions on waiver. Hearing Examiner: Approval on short plat. Approval subject to conditions on exception. Approval subject to conditions on waiver. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 31, 1977, at 10:20 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record by reference, Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director, entered the following exhibits: Exhibit 1: Assessor Map - location of parcel of land on Lake Washington Boulevard. Exhibit 2: G. M. Walker Short Subdivision Map, received by Planning Department on December 17, 1976. Exhibit 3: Letter from Public Works Director, dated January 28, 1977, re Waiver Application #W-003-77. Letter was read into the record by the Hearing Administrative Assistant. The Planning Director, Gordon Y. Ericksen, reviewed the Planning Department report. In regard to the letter from the Public Works Director recommending denial of the waiver, he indicated that approval of indefinite deferral was more acceptable than a waiver if the applicant would sign restrictive covenants. The Public Works Director, Warren C. Gonnason, noted that he recommended the waiver application be denied and that an indefinite deferral be granted subject to the applicant signing a restrictive covenant agreeing to participate in any future Local Improvement Districts. The applicant indicated that such restrictive covenants have been signed and sent to the city. E-002-77 Page Two W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat The Examiner entered Exhibit 4: Telephone conversation with Dick Houghton, Engineering Supervisor, which concurred with the Public Works letter and noted that the Engineering Department could not establish a grade for Lake Washington Boulevard at this time since the Boulevard may be widened or improved in the future. The Examiner asked for comments from the applicant, Mr. Walker. Mr. Walker responded that he had no comment. The Examiner asked for any comments in opposition or concurrence from the audience. There was no response, The Examiner directed questions to the applicant regarding the access road to the existing house located on the pipestem lot and noted that the present condition of the roadway is deeply rutted. The applicant responded that he had plans to gravel the roadway but not to regrade for the reason that only the front two lots, Lots A and B, would be utilizing the roadway. In response to the Examiner's question, the applicant indicated that the back lot was divided four years ago and has access by a 15' easement on the north property line. The Planning Director stated that with reference to the improvements that were mentioned by the applicant there were three potential problems: access to the pipestem lot, storm water runoff and improvements proposed. If the access road were used by other than one party, it would require improvement other than gravel and would require regrading and surfacing with a material such as asphalt. Mr. Walker responded that only Lots A and B would be utilizing the access, and regarding the storm water runoff, water had been running along the road for fifteen to twenty years. He also indicated that a ditch is located along the north side of the easement road. The hearing on Items E-002-77, W-003-77, and #34-77 Short Plat was closed by the Examiner at 10:40 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. Mr. Walker has an existing lot that is approximately 275' x 107' (approximately one-half acre) that he is proposing to short plat into two lots: Lot A, 10,650 square feet, and Lot B, 14,014 square feet. 2. In order to accomplish this proposed request, three procedures must be applied: 1) Short plat; 2) Exception to allow pipestem lot; and 3) Waiver from existing off-site improvements. 3. The original platting of this property and adjacent areas consisted of lots ranging in depth from 400 to 600 feet. This extreme depth caused hardships for future property owners to plat property into smaller lots conforming to the existing zoning of G-7200 and G-6000. 4. The topography on the property has a moderate slope of approximately 9%. 5. The residential character of the area consists of a variety of sizes of lots with the most recent platted lots consisting of approximately 7,000 to 9,000 square feet. 6. The short plat does not create any significant problems for the subject site or for adjacent properties. The proposed property division is one of the few alternatives available for subdivision. 7. Off-site improvements presently do not exist in the general area along Lake Washington Boulevard. E-002-77 Page Three W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat FINDINGS : 8. The existing road providing access to Lot B is narrow, heavily rutted and in relatively poor condition. An existing open ditch lies directly north of the road and borders the northern property line. The northern 15 feet of the property also provides easement access rights to the existing platting lot directly east of Lot B. Mr. Walker owns this lot and the residence directly east of this property. Mr. Walker's residential access is from Wells Avenue North. CONCLUSIONS: Short Plat: i os 25 The proposed lot division is compatible with the adjacent properties. The short plat also agrees with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Exception: 1. Waiver: L.. The access to Lot B is accommodated by a pipestem consisting of an area 20' x 101'. This configuration agrees with the Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1108 23 F.(3)(d.), as amended, and Section 9-1109 (Exceptions). The ordinance also requires that all pipestems at least 20' wide shall not exceed 150' in length and shall consist of permanent paving 10' wide for the length of the pipestem. This ordinance also requires that the remaining portion of the pipestem not paved shall be landscaped. The Public Works Department has indicated that Lake Washington Boulevard is contemplated to be widened and redesigned in the near future. Final grades for this improvement have not been set or determined. The elevation of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks must be calculated from an existing grade usually determined at the center line of the right-of-way. The Public Works Department at this time is not able to present the applicant with the required information to establish grade and this work is not comtemplated in the 1977 department work schedule. The Public Works Director, Warren C. Gonnason, has recommended that the request for waiver of off-site improvements be denied. In lieu thereof, he recommends approval of an indefinite deferral of off-site improvements subject to the signing and filing of restrictive covenants in which the owner agrees to participate in an L.I.D. for such improvements at a future time. The Planning Department has concurred in this report. It can’ be assumed that an L.I.D. will eventually be created to provide these improvements at such time as Lake Washington Boulevard is widened or redesigned. Mr. Walker has submitted a Declaration of Restrictive Covenant document agreeing to participate in a future L.I.D. E-002-77 Page Four W-003-77 #34-77 Short Plat RECOMMENDATION: Short Plat: Approval Exception: 1. Approval subject to grading and paving the existing pipestem to a 10 foot width, as per ordinance. 2. The remaining 20 foot area not paved shall accommodate storm drainage and is to be landscaped with landscaping to consist of vegetation natural to the area, as per ordinance. Waiver: Approval subject to recording the Declaration of Restrictive Covenant document with King County. ORDERED THIS 7th day of February, 1977. TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of February, 1977 by certified mail to the parties of record: Gordon M. Walker Shirley J. Post TRANSMITTED THIS 7th day of February, 1977, to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071, Section 4-3015, request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before February 14, 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. “A is <a % TH+ CITY OF RENTON ae a MUNICIPAL /UILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. $8055 = g CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR @ PLANNING DEPARTMENT = 235-2550 ev January 24, 1977 Gerdon M. Walker 3791 Wells Avenue North Renton, Washington 98055 APPLICATION FOR; EXCEPT ION--#E-002-77} REGARDING: WAIVER--#W-003-77; AND SHORT PLAT--#34-77 Dear Mr. Walker: Atzached for your information is a copy of the Planning Department Staff Report regarding the abovementioned application. If you have any questions, please contact this department. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Dixecton - /} ‘ "2 elie Z£ pete Xe Michael L. Smith Associate Planner MLS :ms Attachment P Gorden t/alKey NOTICE OF PUBL TO HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON \ PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Al WIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON | JANUARY 31. ~~, 1977. , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER ilit FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1; file No. R-001-773; property located on Sunset Boulevard between N.E. 12th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. ¥ 2. |EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; file No. E-002-77; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. 3. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-003-77; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. ~4,. REZONE FROM S-1 TO SR-1; file No. R-004-77; property located at 807 Union Avenue N.E. 5. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-006-773; property located on Jones Avenue N.E. and N.E. 44th Street. Legal descriptions of all applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. All INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT PHL PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 31, 1977 Al 9:00 ALM. 10 LZPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED _ 21, 1977. RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION - MICHAEL L. SMITH » HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, A, Vf) on t h e \¢@ d a y O f Ss ANU Ae o . . oh; os a i i on fl SIGNED Ve St f oY bec / VA SS 2. on i 4 4 “tyr Vg “WW ty als - KENNETH J. OYLER CIVIL ENGINEER & LAND SURVEYOR P.O. Box 2258 « Renton, Wa 98055 255-5050 Dec. 16, 1976 Planning Commission, City of Ranton e: Proposed short plat of G.M. Walker Tith the submission of this short plat , a waiver of the "Off- Site requestec. CITY OF RENTON PLAT APP{CAT LO Ln .. pea Fr 4 cf] uf = i d “ Cy” SI - QOD +7 SHORT PLAT a ft Ih % O\ FILE NO. oe MAJOR PLAT EC 1> 69 # DATE REC'D 4y 77-76 L01§ < y TENTATIVE e a FEE $ sp.% pe A PRELIMINARY at 7 RECEIPT NO./ 75 Oo RY FINAL NC RZ SM NO. = Ng eee PUD NO. . , , J . fae tt, (hocks Jt. i ay Liteon phys wo Elms 12, Plate /) ra 7 APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7: 1. Plat Name & Location G. Aq. Where (worr Sep BO. 2702 Ce WASy Blvp Kn, 2. No. Lots “% Total Acreage 0.6 § zoning G7L90e 3. Owner GakQOW M MIALKER Phone AZ- $-4OOS- Address 270 | Weees he. rA/ - LEWTOM, MASH. G BOSS 4. Engineer Kexyyers S Orc Eve Phone 2$°S~ SOS 0 Address £0. Box 2758 (Et FOV COS 4. F BOSS” 5. Underground Utilities: : Yes No Not Installed Telephone _ ‘ —_—— Electric _ a ——— Street Lights _ c oe Natural Gas _ ae —— TV Cable _—— sams as 6. Sanitation & Water: /“7 City Water [vf Sanitary Sewers /_/ Water District No. /_/ Dry Sewers 1/7 Septic Tanks 7. Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance 8. DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING dlicfar PARKS BUILDING pulfr7 HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. “thalez STATE HIGHWAY FIRE to/rd COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9. STAFF ACTION "/suont PLAT APPROVED 12/71 DENIED TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED J EXPIRED O. HAG EXAMI... ACTION: ___ PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED ___ FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED ‘1. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ____ PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED ___ FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: DATE DATE BOND NO. & TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept. Rev. 12/71 A a } THE CITY OF RENTON baked z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 — Moy g CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR @ PLANNING DEPARTMENT a 235-2550 ep sepre™ January 18, 1977 Gordon M. Walker 3701 Wells Avenue North Renton, WA 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR Applications for Exception to Subdivision Ordinance and Waiver of Off-site Improvements Files hts rO0e- 77 and No. W-003-77 Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 13, 1977 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for January 31, 1977 _ Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre- sent. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director Associate Planner wr NOTE OF PUEE TO HPEARTAG RENTON LAND USE HEAKING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Al HIS REGULAR MELTING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 31.” » 1977. , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER ill | OLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. REZONE FROM R-2 TO B-1; file No. R-001-773; property located on Sunset Boulevard between N.E. 12th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. ¥ 2. |EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; file No. E-002-77; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. 3. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-003-77; property located in the vicinity of 3702 Lake Washington Boulevard N. ~4. REZONE FROM S-1 TO SR-1; file No. R-004-77; property located at 807 Union Avenue N.E. 5. WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-006-77; property located on Jones Avenue N.E. and N.E. 44th Street. Legal descriptions of all applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS 10 SATD PETITIONS ARL INVITED FO bt Moe AI HE PUBLIC HLARING ON JANUARY 31, 1977 Ab 9:00 ALM. 10 E7PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN UBLISHED. January. 21,1977. RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION L, MICHAEL L. SMITH » HEREBY CERTIVY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, on the \@ day of “Sanuacy’, 19 TT |. t vt a grrg “Wey ae? AFFIDAVIT x i ee SI. - ar (i Ailiny T° bob Thier’ te AARRY J. Id Ce se , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and aaa, before me this DTA aay of Mf ez , L9 os Notary no in and kee the Stat Come, residing LPL x7 : i yy 0 Mhh. x. ‘ree, | 7) (Name of Notary’ Public) (Signature e e Lea ee Va hie / a Lech he AE t7,) rie L& (Address) (Address) opin RIGHARD "7 "AHLES.. g pts NOTARY PUBLIC — MINNESGTA 4 4 BENTON COUNTY | My Commission Expires Feb. 5, 1980 3 . LL Ge aaa (City) (State) DSP- G3 FE (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules: ‘and’ regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the deg oN SREP application. ccHie “‘ C) \A KR aft KD Ns Date Received ji/() Vg 29 f i mn a| w BY: ananneee cecenesene yy a Renton Planning Dept. \ # ct ” SING nero 2-73 if A “AN CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ff Oz LO aN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEET :U _ i>, >| > wee “IPA i: = “ae, Ji \ -, “Sea fs FOR_OFFICE USE ONLY: NC ss a : ; ; ; SS Depaat wee” Application No. £04 -+G9 -7€é Negative Dec. ne Date Received pA = SF He EIS INSTRUCTIONS: The purpose of this information is to assist the vari- ous dsacvartments of the City to determine whether an environmental impac: statement will be required before approving and issuing a per- mit ~.* a proposed project. Single family residential uses in non sens: ..v@ areas are exempt from this requirement as established by Wasnircvon Administrative Code 173-34. In «= « tion to the following information, please submit a vicinity map (recommend scale: 1" representing 200' to 800') and a site map (rec- ommended scale: 1" representing 10' to 40'). APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 30 BELOW: 1. Name of applicant GO fvOrw 4 0 yejeet. 2. Mailing address .7O/ Wetes oe vr (2727 CAS? GBOLS Telephone (46~ S$ -Y¥O0S” 3. Applicant is: C lOwner {__jLessee C™=F¥Contract purchaser C_y0ther (specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection 2702 Ce wWrsi Bev sl 10. dL. Legal description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) Tere, 0,00 lheece*tS Cace WAgst Gitte) Of Eves 8a Excepr EAST 210 Keer, We Tr pear Aeconvey / bo. 11 OF AAS, Pree oF Area O27 NK Dimensions L(# ¥IOZC ~ Intended use of property or project (include details: number of units, volume, etc.): 2 — (AD 126 TAL One 7 Generally describe the property and existing iniprovements: O peeved F20pEn7y / / Mouse Total constructiacn cost or fair market value of propused project including additic»al developments contemplatea: Construction dates (month and year) for wnicn permit is requested Begin End iz. i3. 14. Los ié6. List any other permits for this project from state, federal, or other local governmental agencies for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the applica- tion, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and the number of the application or permit: Date Agency Permit Type Submitted* Number Status** * Leave blank if not submitted. ** Approved, denied or pending. Has an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assess- ment been prepared for the proposed project? If "yes" submit copy with this 7 [fro environmental impact worksheet. Are there similar projects, both public and private, existing or planned in the immediate area: yes | “no don't know If "yes" explain. Is the proposed project located in or adjacent to an area or structure having unique or exceptional historic, cultural, or other values considered important by some sectors of the popu- lation? |_| yes [no if “yes" explain. Is the proposed project located in an area that may be considered sensitive and is subject to erosion, landslides, floods, etc.? yes [4 no If “yes" expiain. 17. Is the proposed project located in an area that has a number of large trees or other natura! landscaped areas, waterways, marshes or wildlife? |_]yes | -| no If "yes" explain. ENVIRONMENTAL_IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT: In the following questions summarize what the applicant feels will be the environmental impact, hoth beneficial and adverse, of the proposed project. Consideration should be given to both the human and natural environmental as well as physical, social, and aesthetic aspect. For projects which are nart of a more extensive plan, consider the implications of the entire plan and not just the project now being proposed. 18. Land Use: Will the project have a significant effect on land use In the surrounding area? | |yes | <|no Explain: 19. Project Design and Appearance: Will the project design, appear- ance, lanascuping, etc., assure the maximum protection for the natural environment? | ‘dyes |__| no Explain: 20. Ground Contours: Does the proposed project have an effect on the existing ground contours of the project location? | yes [ Afro. Is the project likely to cause erosion or sedimentation? [yes [ qno? If "yes" to either, explain. a? ees bas 24. Air Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project have a substantial effect on the existing air quality? (Consider the effect of any gas, chemicals, smoke, dust, particulate matter, and odors)? a yes no | If "yes" explain. Water Ouality: Will construction of the project and use of the compieted project be likely to have an effect on the existing water quality of the area? (Consider the adequacy of drainage and runoff and the likely endpoint of any liquids draining from the project.) [_lyes [#]no. Is there a good possibility that this project wil] _require_an expansion of local water and/or sewer facilities? | |yes [@|no If "yes" to either, explain. Noise: Will construction of the project or use of the completed project significantly affect the existing noise levels of the area? | | yes no. Will the project be affected by airports, freeways, railroads or other sources of noise? __lyes [4]no If "yes" to either, explain. Population Density: Will a noticeable population ciange result fron ‘iis project? (Consider the present density per acre in the surrounding community to the proposed density of the project and including daytime density.) [ jyes [7]no. Will the pro- ject cause periodic or temporary fluctuations in population due to tourism, employment, shopping, schools, etc. P| yes Le|no. If "yes" to either, explain. ™ nn SS [o n y eB eo Effect on Population: Will the proposed action directly or in- directly cause the relocation of a sizeable number of persons or the division or disruption of existing community patterns of liv- ing? [ jyes [no If "yes" explain. Schools and Parks: Will the proposed project have an effect on schcols and parks in the area? yes Ino If “yes" explain. Transportation: Will construction of the project or use of the completed project have a significant impact on transportation in the area? Tyee *] no Explain: Public Use: Will the project be available for use by all sectors of the public? — | l yes | {no Explain: Fou FuRIVATE Deeceupwes On~L > Other Impacts: Identify any other beneficial or adverse environ- mental impacts which may result from the construction or comple- tion of the proposed project. Aor € 30. VIEWS OF LOCAL GROUPS: Have you made your plans known to interested community groups or neighbors in the vicinity of the project? [| _Jyes no If "yes" what are their reactions? If "no" do you intend to contact these peopte?|_ lyes [7]no CERTIFICATION BY OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE The Owner/Representative identified in Item No. 1 or 4 above hereby certifies that the information furnished in this Environmental Work- sheet is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge. Signature Title TO BE FILLED IN BY CITY DEPARTMENTS REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: 7 LAF C EMCEE ULL Comments: ; | No § 191 £7¢ at Tie8 as Claes E Zirp) Lisle Signature of Director or Authorizéd Representative / Date * REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Comments: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: ate Comments: a p> (het | C Gated Fight % -0.e. Cc Ce (naw Bar: - C uch. baat Sho (el (5. SH Ps wed CCOFZLE? C J, (to hal oo Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: U4Fii4 Comments: , \ f / i CD: i 4 4 S or four f fe . fey wAvedehl ’ Pp [2 ; | \ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative - 10 - ACTION BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL A. Staff review determined that project: Has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects. May have significant environmental impact and a complete environmental assessment should be prepared by applicant prior to further action on request for permit. RB. Reasons for above conclusion: Signature of Responsible Official or Authorized Represer: ative Date: Form: EIS-1 Planning Department October 15, 1973 , <NDING OF FILE