No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA83-051BEGINNINU OF FILE FILE TITLE MICRO F,141 6*)t v William E. Popp Associates Transportation - Civil Engineers 12061 454-6692 MV PROPERTIES TRAFFIC ACCESS ANALYSIS July 7, 1983 CITY taw RENTON 1-2T JUL 22 1983 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Seattle Trust Building • Suite 400 • 10655 N.E.4th Street • Bellevue,Washington 98004 W Iliam E. Popp Associates Transportation - Civil Engineers 1206) 454-6692 MEMO TO: Daryl Connell FRCM: William F. Popp SUEJECT: MV Properties Traffic Analysis Findings DAZE: July 6, 1983 INTRODUCTION This report analyzes the technical traffic access issues associated with development of the 6 acre MV Properties site on Carr Road in the City of Rerton. The zoning is P-1 thus allowing professional office use of the site. The applicant, however, is proposing a less intense use to minimize traffic impacts. The proposed development consists of 150 apartment units 6.0 acres x 25/acre) . A previous study by Christopher Brown analyzed traffic impacts with a retirement home complex on the site. Retirement hone use is also reviewed in this study as there is some local interest in this proposal . In addition an analysis of maximum possible site generation anc equivalent uses are reviewed under conditions with and without improve- merts on Carr Road. ThE narrative treatment in this study is limited to a summary of analysis, firdings , conclusions, and recommendations with heavy reliance on reader review of the attached calculation sheets. The intended audience for this study is the Traffic Engineering Department of the City of Renton and the client. TRIP GENERATION Apartment use of site produces 900 daily and 90 4-5 PM peak hour trips. Seattle Trust Building • Suite 400 • 10655 N.E.4th Street • Bellevue,Washington 98004 Mem) to Daryl Connell , July 6, 1983, page 2. Retirement complex use produces 850 daily and 44 4-5 PM peak hour trips and 106 3-4 PM peak hour trips . Medical office use produces 3200 daily and 272 4-5PM peak hour trips. The 4-5 PM peak hour period is the critical traffic condition and since apartment use is the proposal that is the analysis benchmark. LEVEL-OF-SERVICE ANALYSIS Under the apartment analysis condition the left turns from the project are theoretically estimated to operate at low LOS E (AM and PM) . However, the field gap measurements indicate that frequent acceptable gaps occur due to apstream and downstream signals at Benson and Talbot such that operational difficulties are not expected especially with the project access drive located in close proximity to Talbot Rd. Motorist perception would probably be that of a higher LOS. Othar street movements are OK, e.g. , left turns in from Carr Rd. are estimated in the LOS A range (AM) and LOS C (PM) . The PM left turns shoild not detrimentally affect operations on Carr Rd. as westbound volumes are light at that time. In the AM the project entering left turn volumes are almost negligible thus impacts on Carr Rd. operations are not expected to be significant. With a left turn acceleration lane on Carr Rd. the project exiting left turns are theoretically estimated to operate at LOS A in the AM and high E in the PM. However, the Talbot Rd. signal influence on PM gaps should result in a batter operation than predicted by the theoretical analysis method, especially witi the project access drive in close proximity to Talbot Rd. This alternative offers more safety for driveway operations than the no-build alternative. Memo to Daryl Connell , July 6, 1983, page 3. Under the signalized condition with access assumed at 98th Ave. S the inter- sec:ion is estimated to operate at LOS A. Higher LOS A operation would result under T-intersection operation. GAP ANALYSIS Observations of gaps of 5 seconds or more in both directions durino the AM and PM peak period were taken at the western edge of the property about 400 feet from the Talbot Rd. intersection. These observations indicated an average gap of 7.2 seconds in the AM and 9.4 seconds in the PM. These gaps occur at average rates of 1 .5 and 1 .1 gaps per minute during the AM and PM periods respectively. These gaps are created in the observed pattern by the sigials at Talbot and Benson Rd. In the AM the average gap of 7.2 seconds is slightly below the TRB recommended critical gap value of 7.5 secs. This , however, is not particularly trouble- some as the 7.5 sec value for critical gap is a rounded estimate which can increase or decrease in proportion to volume of traffic and delay, ie. , the longer the delay the shorter the acceptable gap. For many of us a 5.0 second gap is entirely adequate. Furthermore, the westbound AM vehicles were freluently slowing and moving to the outside lane producing more gaps in the inside lane than are represented by the field data. Bas :d on these findings it is concluded that acceptable gaps for left turns out from the proposed project site are and should continue to be available in the future at the western end of the property. SIG1T DISTANCE Due to the earthen bank adjacent to the sidewalk through the curved portion Mem) to Daryl Connell , July 6, 1983, page 4. of Carr Rd., sight distance for the site exiting vehicles limits the choice of driveway locations to the western and possibly the easternmost edges of the property. Desireable vehicle-vehicle sight distance requirements are 520 feet to the east for left-turn-out, 330 to the west for right-turn-out and 295' to the west for left-turn-in movements. The existing temporary site access drive located approximately 130' east of the western property line (station 22 + 50 on Carr Rd. ) is almost perfectly located for satisfying the 520' easterly sight distance requirement. Westerly sight distance requirements are readily met at this location. At the easternmost edge of the property (within 70' of the property line) sight distance to west is limited by brush and possibly earth to about 50' less than the desireable 330' . Assuming the amount of earth removal is not substantial , a right-in right-out plus left turn-in would be operationally feasible at this location. A left turn-out is not desireable as available gaps are not expected to be as plentiful at this location due to higher speeds and platoon dispersion effects from the Talbot Rd. signal . SIGNAL WARRANTS Signal warrants are not met for this project proposal . Warrant I - Volume warrant is not met for the minor street volume. Similarly, Warrant 2 - interruption of heavy main street flow - is not met for the minor street. The Warrant 2 volume is a minimum of 53 side street vehicles per hour on one approach for each of eight hours. The project estimated volume is 25 vehicles per hour for this condition. Therefore, a signal is not warranted under the apartment development scenario. Memo to Daryl Connell , July 6, 1983, page 5. MAX :MUM PROJECT TRIP GENERATION The level-of-service analysis suggests that the maximum trip generation pos:;ible without street improvements occurs under the proposed 150 unit apartment use of the site. Theoretically however this operation remains in the LOS E range although the gap analysis suggests that the gaps would occur with signal cycle regularity such that motorist perception would probably be that of a higher LOS. Under a signalization scenario the maximum possible trip generation and building areas at LOS C are as follows for alternative uses of the site: Apartments = 10,200 ADT; 1675 units Medical Office = 12,800 ADT; 319,000 SF Nursing Home = 13,100 ADT; 4850 Beds These capacities could be expected to decline in proportion to volume increases on Talbot Rd. after 1984. The left turn acceleration lane improvement concept provides a margin of inc-eased capacity which the level-of-service analysis suggests might be roughly equivalent to doubling the apartment traffic, i .e. ,1800 ADT. See discussion above relative to LOS E conditions. RECOMMENDATIONS 1 . Provide an unsignalized main access driveway located at approximately station 22 + 50 on Carr Rd. (130' ± east of the western property line. ) This driveway should have a 2-lane exit throat. 2. A limited secondary access point at the eastern edge of the property is operationally feasible if sight distance obstruction to the west can be eliminated. Movements should be limited to right-in, right-out, and left turn-in by appropriate channelization. This access point would Memo to Daryl Connell , July 5, 1983, page 6. reduce demand and thus slightly improve traffic operations and capacity at the main access driveway. 3. Under the possibility of a more traffic generation intense development scenario the main access driveway should be signalized and the signal interconnected with the Talbot Rd. signal . vs.swot tL WA it r-- SSESSO.Pan r•r,.• r•.• ne.r q•.••.r.••ay. '••. FttNNTY A r KING COUNTY ASSESSOR t n•w 1 rrns Iii f w IhIFaI—.•• +. iOil' s I w"" r ' r, fir. T t IJ - 1 •" / I__ J Y . sir-,.." F 9 OO t s t'r mil' „ l-X...pa , vale• ,;-'' ,,-;:it.51.:177; 1 T1\., ' . ' ..,.• t.. C.,.. I V• ft. a Ii ; VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL 1• r7 r1.-.7('. F.'_ " I^ 3r` r' ' 1. e R _w• ' r -- ,.— •i r,.,...... t. ss t_._ t....t: i --i--. h Y giE w. YY r_f ,r 1.••.e. t• /. I s1r b_s SITE T.—-—17 II. 1-( le-4-"z"------ H...".........,...-.-- r- '..—•- r _3 T j t I ! \ P'41 I! I Tn. sr.--.Z. OTThe Aid:IS:a i .7 ; TA il ii ! 0t i a ON1 VALLEY PLICE. i t w/• y+ Ii. VALLEY VILLA CARE CENTEJ.. O GFINERAL it t - --- L' ' I .» 4l It , _ 1 w n. ........ — — l4 C•MO-M •r•• o f , . t . i+ I Y 1 325 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE E 41 V /--e-D P6127/e" 274 P/C 4/1/4C-V 7--G1-/4,7/C4 PPA/ /X 47.0EA/ 7Z2 6f16ci/G177 CM/S irgat coem,/. dr/hatlfaxl / /40 e;;••,1 oe ov.t. / d9 4( ifJO k,e-t//419 if,1 fi'Ayi; 73/r egva 14'rt /4// Ae_ia 114174 Mcek'eg, re m en 74 s o,n as L = Lc . s - sx7R-O£'L_ S y o 6n, b r'9 L s' h L S L £ L ° 's io s /L /B'o, ram.d-ss.•L ss 9 •, hs 8 4S S'9 'ec isS t—o/ f9S 2 '8 S .ss.L-os:L s ,.,,was o'9 12_ 9 s', %S 'r' %'s %'9 'r,B ns'L-S/S:L r»S O 8 9?z O S /£ Y/ /9 S '6 6 SAS."L-ad. 6L 'rz _5// ' 9 0 Li 8'£l99 6 's 'a on886G6s:L-s£.L 5 Z. O 6 s s '£6 'r 5 G'o/ A '9 ` 9 1r9 i s fi 9 51:1-or-L y/4-Note.02.9 it-90 # dtiz-y Q0;8 - 144P01L 5 it el /, , 'S :,4Y 6-Doy 1//', t'no,-2,)5- o s- cif y wt 4-129 6'06C IE sk..5 4 -f 4. 016 5 .9,! 5 L 'S/ 'o '7 'L'9 %', /0'0/ s 04'5 L. '6 ezz 9 e'6/ 6.9 '95 6'3 g %/ 5 1 os 's8 o/:s- so:5 6 8h L 5 '2 (£S 'F9 LS £S r58 .! so :s - cO 6 s LL 5 T/ o :5 's(/ 005--ss S'of r4 4 i 8f /6'9 (9 8 'r 8 ss:/ _ s s ,// 9 o'9 (r£/ ;S ''/ 'o•£r 'o', 705 o5:4 -sr h J 14"1s1$ .'E/s } i Qr f l A l Ls- y q/ 66 y7a 4L M/ '.L'/ ,y,(Y J.,l S ;-1NIJ O7 ap/ kv F2,92.41, -AO sfu9-,as J o s oto 6'-1 'O 14ycf icf, 17 e I 14( Rh o ;h - 00;A:77—w-f-Z 4 ") Eet/, re//t/.4fW yAgi/rd tAFENGR22 CITY OF RENTON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING kTE 8/06/82 VEHICLE VOLUME SUMMARY CARR RD E OF TAL80T RJ S w3 A. M. VOLUMES P.M. VOLUMES 15 MIN• HOURLY TIME 15 MIN. HOURLY 29 08/05/82 * 12 : 15 * 185 11 THURSDAY * 12 : 30 * 171 21 12 : 45 * 186 11 72 01 : 00 * E12 754. 11 01 : 15 * 181 10 01 : 30 * 184 1'4 01 : 45 * 167 1247 u2 :00 * 177 709 c u 12 u2 : 15 * 181 9 U2 : 30 * 185 7 02 : 45 * 211 9 37 03 :00 * 203 780 4 4 u3 : 15 • 182 16 u3 : 30 * 181 10 u3 : 45 * 176 10 40 u4 : 00 * 131 670 5 u4 : 15 *i` 121 12 04 : 30 * 110 23 l 4 : 45 *;:. 2 35 75 5 : 00 *tEn 475 38 U5 : 15 * N 56 u5 : 30 *IFEW 91 05 : 45 _*NW 145 330 06 : 00 * 151 537 177 06 : 15 * 164 r6 247 06 : 30 * 155 315 v6 : 45 * 172 193 684 j 383 332 - 1071 u7 : 0J 35 .317 7 : 5 * 171 07 : 3 147 b 364 119 48 _369 0.71 _* qc - 359 409 use ua 4 134 1 Yos_310 l 8 : 105 3 258 u(3 : 30 * 95 233 08 :45 * 81 247 1048 09 : 00 * 93 374 178 u9 : 15 * 8182 178 u9 :30 194 u9 :45 * 85 192 742 10 : 00 * 66 314 196 1u : 15 * 71 245 08/04/82 * 10 : 30 * 82 159 IVEDNESOAY • 10 : 45 * 61 181 781 11 :00 * 66 280 172 11 : 15 * 63 185 11 : 30 * 29 152 11 : 45 * 49 171 680 12 :00 * 40 181 PEAK VOLUMES OF 1409 rRJM 07 : 00 TO 08 : 00 A .M. AND 781 FROM 02: 15 TO 03: 15 P. AM PEAKING FACTOR 0. 11 PM PEAKING FACTOR 0. 06 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.95 brHOuRAVOLUME FACTOR 0. 92 24 HOUR VOLUME 12661 1 11599 EXPANSION FACTOR 1 .00 ADJUSTED 24 HOUR VOLUME 12661 .00 AFTOT 01 CITY OF RENTON TRAFFIC ENGINEERIN3 TE 8/06/82 VEHICLE VOLUME SUMMARY Carr Rd ) S 43RD ST E OF TALBOT RD S Eb A.M. VOLUMES P.M. VOLUMES 15 MIN. HOURLY TIME 15 MIN• HOURLY 77 08/05/82 * 12: 15 * 192 60 THJRSDAY * 12 : 30 * 175 50 12 : 45 * 177 40 227 u1 : 00 *140 684 31 01 : 15 * 192 26 01 : 30 * 162 23 01 : 45 * 176 42 122 02 :00 * 152 682 30 02 : 15 * 203 22 u2: 30 * 169 7 U2: 45 * 233 10 69 03 : 00 * 250 855 13 us : 15 * 269 16 03 : 3u * 296 fe-1 !JC 8 03 : 45 * 335 3 40 u4 : 00 * 33 933 8 0 4 :_15 * -- 3 6 3 0;1 — 12 U4 : 30 * 384 - - — fo`! 13 04 : 45 * 346 ico 6 39 u5 : 00 *1455 f 6 u5 : 15 *144j, -. 12 u5 : 30 * 1/ 15 05: 45— * 44 c%. 16 49 06 : 00 * 321 1441 u72 37 06 : 15 * 231 47 U6 : 30 * 233 60 u6 : 45 * 211 51 195 u7 : 0o * 215 890 72 u7 : 15 * 174 8 U7 : 3 * 169 J 99 07 : 45 167 93 362 08 : 00 153 663 5 166 110 u8 : 30 * 195 100 08 : 45 * 195 109 414 u9 : 00 * 217 773 104 09 : 15 * 212 106 u9 :30 * 175 106 u9 :45 * 142 1 120 436 i0 :oo * 142 671 120 06/04/82 * 10 : 15 * 153 139 EONESOAT * 10 : 30 4 105 138 1U : 45 * 95 161 558 1 * 11 :00 * 89 442 143 r * 1 1 : 15 * 81 160 i '" IW * 11 : 30 * 78 183 - 4/% 1 11 : 45 * 88 136 (672; 12 : 00 * 80 327 PEAK VOLUMES `OF 672 FROM 11 :00 TO 12 : 00 A•M• AND 1496 FROM 04 : 15 TO 05 ; 15 P. " AM PEAKING FACTOR 0. 05 Pm PEAKINC3 FACTOR 0. 11 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.90 PM PEAK HOJR FACTOR 0.92 24 HOUR VOLUME 12999 16 HOUR VOLUME 11684 EXPANSION FACTOR 1 •00 ADJUSTED 24 HOUR VOLUME 12999.00 4444 *- IZGGI ZwL* 3i.' .:, 7L11 9/fur /, i ryd,-/ ZLZ ono Yaisf %s aad 0 a,9 0 /717/ / : 2/l r-Vv.///d krif - y% /r 7177-0“ k:fs ! k7d f/-S. y(.1/1 10/ 1, 10 f/ P / 7""' L75/ my), - /sdv p,nv7I aA rim //7 hip .S" 4/_5/ I%! of 06 0/ xo6 s dam•f p_o6 = Pam/ y2 574-"wfi#-vd1 1.447k/1/14Ji / 0/M 1, ,I () sad, lM i/WIdI,'/ 71?iifs 9 54I: Yi °s''Nl m` 1 dd /x'i / al"Kna sOV-2, 02 ' Man/fr 1Y041#1-ell Oh) d/0l 77C1n 2tc.7-,e/.5 a 77cAI p5,O,, Vd-4iq Plioc.c pAl ge•-ot 44u..- /41/ 61 frsi fe.....11,4k). 2 8 i77..___J ,812 CS3)06) 043) lo 3 t hI 'vc` f- U ,ar/ice l'/11 /J /ur 0 283to 23f•,(5 49c 8 sue-7720 4,' a' 7a t 41;^4) fi o f 7I f. TN-CO 7r our- 30 0.37. 7,4271 J 93,1 Nil A 1,41r Alin 4-4 iL' c- p, 4 Lut 9 y y.z56 33.3io' —"'' 77 sB 09 1 56.39.0 1 73 t la=e 0 octT- f /O 2 T2//gar/DA/ trie it'STri f411/1'- GIs x g _ e/i? PA l/ e 0- ices- 60-if Cat f? 70o& 33 ryr or Dovely C 3oG f w, lz.. 1/4p0 prajecrAoliAleozel o11 rrlc e.os(vy 4 reci 0* h4 9e ) P A/m r Toffs N-/s A" .kr-Go rv= 6o o 30 c,/ /lea u+ Dr,v«vay @ 987'4 . ate)Rd-•:. 4 tv.ad 9814 iao 4 2 f Os) iVik4K;; p) 15 3 l C a; J 0 ,a Q c C,b cC .`" q 4(-4- iiéeJ41 u.,tCS 6r4 Drrvuv Al 9Bf:; J i) 51 CZ3 i (17) C rT IOr 6* /f4 U noer T/€i r/UC A.40 47LftfJi 7rfv4c.. 9A71 Trn 1- i Ticen. eYq T fn. A'om efildiWiLy Fr-~ priv " 1 i ese+-.e. RtScrvL l isei. Alt es/. fib es/- e -E Xis>i Pm a a- 36S c - 293 35 iy8 ffl I 776 7.96• 5 plh ; 13-3 518 c -.2 7 3 E - 5t 1 8l w/QM /9 - 776 eti - c IYI: z 5-c e M. P a - 3 9 8 C- 7 3 F — 8 g 5l elf= L. 5 A- al2 .la.K e c oil /14 -si11ie2- eta far'5 OH Lou re 1 Unsi nalized "+T/" Intersection Capacity Calculation Form Ii f I V oC /S /1,°W Corr /(J Counts: ' Location Plan: or----Date / j r1 f j1.2 iiiq p PM E= Day :TLu5 '/ A B Time Pinf44 H4fr T TIIS4, t -77 Control 5 412 Si - C aY,oc-,-'' — Prevailing Speed ?0 .4._ Hourly Demand Traffic Volumes from 'yD to Sys:" p m r_ Approach A B 7 C ""y"- R_. Movement AT R 1 f CLC J utN j -- \\A BL r BT e Iry Volume f y8.2 5 3 /7 oS .23'6s-%„v o e e,'l/' pch S7/ y3 /7 S3S ,2 3 I7 14NYVRijed (`% ''f't` iv tiT.nici Step I Right Miro from C CR ( 6xis-tii7 /98qWfr'O)e` i 9 gy t''' e k/ Conflicting Flows= MN= AR + Ar7= from Fig. I) 02 + 7y/ = 763 „„ -22-f- 76 = t SW Critical Gap from Table 2 T,_ 6. sec 6'a Capacity from Fig. 2 = M,.,= M, = 375 w" _ 3S5— Shared Lane—See Step 3 Z. No Shared Lane Demand = Ca= —'NA — 7 Available Reserve= M, —CR= 36& ,,, - 3c/9 Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) ho.-/ `Q'`Puf c ( ] D al KS,'µAr Step 2 Left'dint from B B,. ' nI.,,m al.,r'o..<oir w s Conflicting Flows= MN= AR from Fig. I) 3 + fey 5= / 03/ ,,,, V34/07= /090 Critical Gap from Table 2 T,= sec S, S" Capacity from Fig. 2 = MN.= M2= 3/O Re. =290 Demand= BL= /7 PTA = f7 Capacity Used= 100(BL/M2)= S,S % =518 9y i Impedance Factor from Fig.3= P,_ •96 C' 9Y Available Reserve= Ma— BL= '?y 3 =.27 3 1rDelay&Level of Service(Table 3) 4/ tidett S Fet Ei Step 3 Left Turn from C Cr. 1 Conflicting Flows= MN= AR+ + BL + 36. r+ a2+/OcF7 4 3S7r10*l9+/)+0( from Fig. I) 12 .+9j+J7+3iZ= 3 93 = /08to Critical Gap from Table 2 T,= 1? sec r8O y,o Capacity from Fig.2= MN.=- 6D_O . -50 115 Adjust for Impedance MN.x P,=M3_ 5 8 "` h _9 7 q X S—i 8 VNo Shared Lane Demand= CL=—D'eh =2 3 Available Reserve = M,—CL= '3.S " =oZ p Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) veil killr. 5 O041 Shared Lane Demand = CR+CL=Cm,= M 0 i/r i Shared Lane with Right Turn CR+CL) Capacity of Shared Lane= M"= ( CR/M,)+(C,,/M3)4, GC Mt'= ro" S../,7 :tt Available Reserve= Mt7—Cm,= K" I _ Delay&Level of Service (Table 3) i Overall Evaluation ,E57 m G O,S (e# 47 d's) t/e{T1 74 fr?S DS- D f lib, I1 g . ,>/frPv ovennL t e 2 or ,3 w CAI4# e fieri9n44, o4re /S , Unsignalized/ asn T" Intersection Capacity Calculation Form Ii I I 1/ Intersection Car v`i £, ,,, ' -upvS I.rarinn Plan Counts: Date /987 AM Day PPABTimeAinAAA ,4 e Control S 4/fn f— C ' , 7 Prevailing Speed 3o Nteis TN Hourly Demand Traffic Volumes from 2 to M.4 m Approach A T B 7 C --Y' Movement AT AR 1 BL r BT 'F' Ci. Th CR Volume 38S a 1%02 E"fslir, 142) // J pk`— pchhar Table I1 $108 //y8 , 5/ _ 9 14 Vie-4ed 0,4.4) —1_ y—_ Step 1 Right Them from C CR C.- afri 9 Q®S/c.//ot czelke..s ILMe- Conflicting Flows= MN= a + 2A1/ = O6. from Fig. I 1 6 " Critical Gap from Table 2 T,= 4 o sec Capacity from Fig. 2= M.v.= M, = 7B6—rt, Shared Lane—See Step 3 frz No Shared Lane Demand = CR= .e" Available Reserve= Mt—CR= 771 .eA Delay&Level of Service(Table 3)Or AA '.--(A Step 2 Left Tlrrn from B B,. r Conflicting Flows=MN= AN + A = from Fig. I) 21= , )3,+" Critical Gap from Table 2 T,= 5.S sec Capacity from Fig.2 = MN.= Ms= 8°D , N, Demand = BL= 47 A Capacity Used= 100(BJM2)= 0•` % Impedance Factor from Fig.3 = P Available Reserve= Ms— BL= 79‘ +r" Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) i lk ar n-o citlt7 Step 3 Left Thrn from C Cr. "Th Conflicting Flows=MN= A,+ Arz. BL + By., from Fig. I) y Xi= I27•Z.„ =6-,-?7 * '*O 282 Critical Gap from Table 2 T,= 8-O sec 30 Capacity from Fig.2= MN•2'- 7S K. *Is- Adjust for Impedance MN.x Ps= M3= 75 ren = q9S 1/" No Shared Lane Demand= CL=—//.eA 5/ Available Reserve= Ms—nCy, 2 r get., y ,`/ Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) ye'y /oK 1 dt{a?S I . I n /;#4 Or A-'14 Shared Lane Demand = CR+CL=C,u 1=== Shared Lane with Right Turn CR+CL) Capacity of Shared Lane= M10= (CR/MI)+(CL/M3) M 13= aM Available Reserve= MIS'''.Ca,,_ ek Delay&Level of Service (Table 3) 0 Overall Evaluation e:S7/M .G(/ OS e 4-7 ice-, 4l itkMs Pi+ O 4t/i ' ie C 10 5 4 yr A-0 os u,/ i'L/N L 2 G,rr R 9,1 /161 S. 9851 (,//?-oie r/-4,/54,7.11 4/4,, eki-e40-15 jI/'o. c„I zs 4& q. SHE4 2) 7//g 1 a)- 2 5x = Pm 4-44 . S„t iygyo ii --, 05.). y...K..)... z_ iim 134 iir 7(sb) CA B of C: Y7 (6) dat,v- f)fil Pe A.4 144 rr ac(et-53S4-/s-4,0)}O) 05- 7f/Y86+5(zo. _ v Y6, 3 400 479 / 1i z * 3 400 CD osQc,cp,0)4./5-6/+/.1) _ . 3 6 3,51=3moo 4, = .uor- ct2r a . Ays _ NO c/ZT 7; Tl G(//)+C4- 8 14ti,BOO Y = yBs ys Ai or- cArT C = /S 2±s - v8 - 3 /sece.as Y:= . 97a ArM + 3— y o s 1 i - , Se 72- i — 347 38 -sec,4 o, v 5172 6 = /_ 1 Yriak ) -7Sp719 i wow/X/j(/ = fen/ K l v!w 4aw,-a„1J11O }.o f o s u ar21- 1/a1 7 FE QoBi 7 A.1 19) ' _ (9 ° 7 LS / 008/ Oo9i _ /99 '7 fs '% 09 A 08 ao8( 9/ 7 £-9 7 7 b --f- 7i1 f (Y)1 f oo L Dolt elf7_54 -r-6 9/rt / - j'ob•+/9S/4- No) soya 7Ze` = lyi44-,G l 7/0- =ssm y ono Zo.4-_7 y 4. l 7= w° "" - Pr n mad woof . 7 - /) ss'X 7/ 1)07 72 lr pV as sb Sc v 58 " _ '7 So/ D?c 1?5 Vgb 0//,- ' ' "b "r-y1 1o.g 91 1 Ylh/lXV// pi ilty;/144, eo c_-/ 711e,"7 06<-74 .023 &) of ,441 Ffil Pe.(4 Wour ke,AtA- fivmktb, ,4 ft Tuefrt 02 3 S- 44-e foie AxtivItafr, on 7,41 6--eAe.e,-)4'1K- OW Y-040 i0Z ifiee/ DIAliede laZ elo z 77C Ipr- Liu 11,25 fl 4,4 nt 1/11144-7.1077/ 70Z 5, /03 kkr zi . ,9s5 464 5 SiC yT D/s 7-4-4V6-6- ,e-Q"//2e 44 A/ T 477,fif Se.4 5441 ),ch .re CO r 4' (4(4120 r)ffie-ti = ti s G U-S/ 2#'c r - `i' it9 r 17)30 dlr ifitAA * j) = ZJv Z7.r 31 vir419 la/ 1/4in ze SeL41/are r4,/74 Pe /pg, ,Ikerlivd (39e 321i ra' V clo Div L Its aJ/44. ,0 /HO f f/ /.ereel 4D 1 eAO/'7L d,/47f e i/ l'4,055j44 r pe144/0-4/ hin PW4 474/ h/41 reffd _ 4- d: 66u/ abroil)- fy n1 77?I &7/Cof ("ap ‘1/2 /2i5zrrr4le Dis/a Pie e LS her* /WSJ C r,19 s«s SS GX O XI.v = g/9 c- rill/ /urn Die GrI fp 6,1/ 514,5 6.c/ e;cx4447) = 3Z9 35.001h e ' ? Iarn I N u = q•73a' c-3SY / 7) Z Ghtc t us j M 4Lc, IcG, / /a k.c /41rih ,cr au,f2A it s r1 n Apr 7d0' eoi7/cr y 119 Aj A'.51z et = 0:Ao x/.!/7 ? ‘.I/ 4 te,5 4•1/ 4cGS 1•5'pi reecho., -ria lrJ-9 lees I7, A eeU"t rrr ma et ea ve '. B 9 Y i 4S onlite,t/p, 4.4o ve ooi0 corr.C/ ia,7 d(o< 77g6 yrr lae.s OF R4,.71/ 41 O BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT0 ® z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 5 O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9 co- 09 60 SEPjE0\ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 1986 TO: File FROM: Zoning Division SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF FILE FOR M-V PROPERTIES FILE R-051-83 The applicant, M-V Properties, has filed a new rezone application (file R-064-84). This file is being transmitted to the Clerk's office for placement with the permanent records. JSM:ss 2352Z OF R4,474 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z o 0 ammo MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09 TF SEPjEP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Mr. Richard U. Chapin q -Lb- 55 ) Suite 900, ONB Plaza 10800 N.E.8th P.O.Box C-90016 Bellevue, Wa. 98009-9016 SUBJECT: M-V PROPERTIES, FILE R-051-83, ECF-042-83 Dear Mr. Chapin: The Renton Environmental Review Committee is in receipt of your letter dated September 19, 1983, regarding condition No. 1 contained in the Final Declaration of Non-Significance for the above referenced project. This condition required that a sixty (60) foot wide easement through the property be conveyed to the City. The committee, at it's September 21, 1983 meeting, reconsidered this item per your request, and concluded that the condition imposed was still reasonable and an environmental concern that was to be mitigated in this fashion. The request for deleting condition No. 1 is therefore denied. For ''.he Environmental Review Committee Roger? Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB/JFL/plp cc: H-V Properties C/D Devo OF RED y THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Z o am.BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9q O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593O, 9gr D SEP1.E 0 P MEMORANDUM DATE: September 21, 1983 T O: Environmental Review Committee FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Land Use Hearing Examiner eL, SUB "ECT: M-V Properties - R-051-83 Request for Reconsideration Per a phone conversation with Richard Chapin, he explained to this office that the attar:hed letter is a request for reconsideration. He will submit a written verification of this request. LAW OFFICES OF INSLEE,BEST,CHAPIN&DOEZIE,P.S. SUITE 900,ONB PLAZA 10800 N.E.8TH P.O.BOX C-90016 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98009 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton Renton City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 INSLLz, BEST, CHAPIN & P.S. Mary Ann Barkshir-RECEIVED Henry R.Hanssen,Jr. Deborah S.Berg ATTORNEYS AT LAW James F.Hoover Jerome D.Cartp&j OF RENTON SUITE 900,ONB PLAZA Evan E.Inslee Richard U.Ch 1 , aM4NER 10800 N.E.8th William C.Irvine Don E.Dascenzo WEARING EX A P.O.Box C-90016 William J.Lindberg,Jr. Thomas H.DeBuys 1983 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98009-9016 Patricia A.Murray E.Michael Doezie S E P 1 1 John T.Rassier PM 206)455-1234 Milan Gail Ryder Michaelae E..Wi in Joe E.WishcamperM.e+{{i Thomas H.tii * I LV11111211 121.;t 4151 David A.Best,of Counsel September 19 , 1983 i city cCBedding&2n.,cg i:pt j lEnvironmentalReviewCommitteer1 City of Renton U. `'='=_ ° - I Renton City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Re: M-V Properties Application No.SEP 1 9 1983 R-051-83 ECF-042-83 Gentlemen: We are attorneys for M-V Properties who have made appli- cation for a rezone under application No. R-051-83 . This letter is an appeal from Condition 1 contained in the Final Declaration of Non-Significance. Condition No. 1 contains the following language : 1 . A sixty (60) foot wide easement through the property is to be conveyed to the City from the intersection of Carr Road and 98th Avenue S .E. to the south property line of the subject property. " In my opinion, the imposition of that condition is specifically prohibited by Chapter 49 (Engrossed Senate Bill No. 4972) , Laws of 1982 , First Ex. Sess . Section 5 of that statute prohibits any city from imposing any tax, fee, or charge, either direct or indirect on the classification or reclassification of land. The exception applies only to dedications of land or easements pur- suant to RCW 58 . 17 . 110 dealing with plats . It is not applicable to reclassifications . Further, the need for the requested dedi- cation does not arise from the reclassification of the subject property, but is solely for the benefit of serving another piece of property which currently is owned by the State of Washington and has no satisfactory access . It should further be noted that the requested dedication is not a part of any comprehensive road plan and, in fact, will never, because of its location, be a part of any further road scheme to the south. Environmental Review Committee City of Renton September 19 , 1983 Page Two Re: M-V Properties Application No. R-051-83 ECF-042-83 There is absolutely no environmental impact which will be caused by the reclassification of the subject property which will be mitigated by providing access to the adjoining property. This condition could not be imposed as a condition to the rezone nor does its deletion have any impact on the declaration of environ- mental non-significance. For all of the foregoing reasons, it is requested that the condition be deleted. Very truly yours, INSLEE, BEST, CHAPIN DOEZIE, P.S . Rt_st)...vj I A ' CLTIL Richard U. Chapin RUC/pjm cc : M-V Properties INSLEL, BEST, CHAPIN & DOEL ,, P.S. Mary Ann Barkshire Henry R.Hanssen,Jr. Deborah S.Berg ATTORNEYS AT LAW James F.Hoover Jerome D.Carpenter SUITE 900,ONB PLAZA Evan E.Inslee Richard U.Chapin 10800 N.E.8th William C.Irvine Don E.Dascenzo P.O.Box C-90016 William J.Lindberg,Jr. Thomas H.DeBuys BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98009-9016 Patricia A.Murray E.Michael Doezie John T.Rassier Stanley E.Erickson 206)455-1234 Milan Gail Ryder Michael M.Fleming Joe E.Wishcamper Thomas H.Grimm David A.Best,of Counsel September 21, 19783 r i city rs Rctan Bcilding&Zolmg Dept l i Environmental Review Committee i City of Renton Renton City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 SEP 2 2 1983 Re: M-V Properties - Application No. R-051-83/ECF-042-83 Gentlemen: It is requested that my letter of September 19 , 1983 concern- ing the above-captioned matter be treated as a Request for Recon- sideration by the Environmental Review Committee . It is my understanding that following our receipt of notifi- cation of your action on the reconsideration, we will have an opportunity to appeal if we so desire . Sincerely, INSLEE, BEST, CHAPIN DOEZIE, P.S. Richard U. Chapin RUC/pjm cc: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton M-V Properties Mr. Daryl Connell NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a FINAL declaration of NON-significance with conditions for the following projects: M-V PROPERTIES (ECF-042-83) Application to rezone approximately 6 acres of property from G-1 to R-3 for the construction of a 150 unit multi-family complex, File R-051-83; located approximately 400 feet east of Talbot Road S. and south of S.E. Carr Road. R(OE3ER T A. & NORMA J. CLAYTONCF-047-83) Application for conditional use permit to allow a day care center out of a single-family residence in a G-1 zoned district, File CU-055-83; located at 4907 Talbot Road South. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by September 19, 1983. Publil: September 5, 1983. Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Cindy Strupp being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that she is the chief ekerk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, l.'C T 1 2 printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit, King County, Washington.That the annexed is a..N.otice...of..Environmental Determination as it was published in regular issues(and Public Notice Public Notice not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period NOTICE OF CLAYTON(ECF-047-83) ENVIRONMENTAL Applfcanon for Conditional DETERMINATION use permit to allow a day of One consecutive issues,commencing on the ENVIRONMENTAL owe center out otasingle- REVIEW BOARD family residence in a G-1 RENTON,WASHINGTON zoned district,file CU-055-5 th day of September 19 8 3 ,and ending the The Environmental Re- 83;located at 4907 Tabot view Committee (ERC)has Road South. issued a FINAL declaration Further Information re- of NON-significance with gwding this action is avail-day of 19 both dates conditions for the following able in the Building andinclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub scribers duringall of said projects:period. That the full amount of the fee P I Zoning Department,V PRQPERTIES(ECF- Municipal Building,Renton, Washington,235.2550.Any charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $1.9 2.0 which tcatton to rezone ap- appeal of.ERC atllon must has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the proximately 6acres of pro- be fled with the Hearing first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent Percy from G-1 to R-3 for Examiner by September 19, insertion. the construction of a 150 1983. unit multi-family complex, Pubes in the Daily Re-File R-051-83;located all- cord Chronicle September f proximately 400 feet east 5, 1983.R8710pofTalbotRoadS. and Chief...Clerk south of S.E.Carr Road. ROBERT A.&NORMA J. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5th day of September_ 19 83 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at KM King County. Federal Way Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill281,effective June 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. VN 087 Revosed 5/S2 N OT E ENVIRONmENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF42-83 R-051-3 PROPOSED ACTION APPI ICATION TO RE2ONF APPROXIMATDY 6 ACRFS OF PROPERTY FROM G4 TQ R-3 FOR THE CONSTRl1CT I ON OF A 15O I IV i T Ji ll T I-FAMI I Y (x1P'PI FX, GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 SET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD SOUTH AND SOUTH OF S.F. CARR ROAD. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ( E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOESDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT . ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL OWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THF RE TON HEARING EXAMINER E3Y 5:00 P.M., SEPTFTFER 19, ins FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING Sr. ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION n .. ,. r, K aiP. .rri ilr i;+t4q} t' i,f Sl 1 Y•' 1.;1 ni _ i°06 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(sl: R-051-83 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-042-83 Description of Proposal:Application to rezone approximately 6 acres of property from G-1 to R-3 for the construction of a 150-unit multi-family complex. Proponent: M-V Properties Location of Proposal: Located approximately 400 feet east of Talbot Road S. and south of S.E. Carr Road. Lead Agency:City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on August 10, 1983, August 24, 1983, August 31, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building & Zoning Department Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson, John Webley, Roger Blaylock, Gary Norris, David Clemens, Robert Bergstrom, James Matthew, Richard Houghton, and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-042-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Daryl Connell, DATED July 22, 1983. 2.Application: Rezone (R-051-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Fire Prevention Bureau, Traffic Engineering Division, Utility Engineering Division. Recommending Declaration of Significance: Policy Development Department. More Information: Building & Zoning Department, Design Engineering Division. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: This Final Declaration of Non-significance is issued subject to the following conditions beinc complied with: 1.A sixty (60) foot wide easement through the property is to be conveyed to the City from the intersection of Carr Road and 98th Avenue S.E. to the south property line of the subject property. 2. Participation in street improvements for the South 43rd Street corridor will be required at the time of receiving a building permit. Participation shall include payment to the City, $13,725.00 based on 915 vehicle trips at $15.00 per vehicle trip on the basis of 150 housing units as proposed in the subject rezone application. 3. Access shall be limited to right in and right out of the subject site unless appropriate left turn channelization is provided and approved by the City and concurrence is received by King County. FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE M-V PROPERTIES APPLICATION FOR REZONE, FILE R-051-83 (ECF-042-83) PAGE 2 SIGNATURES: jzz' j` //' •(,,/It Ronald G. Nelson vid R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ric and C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: September 5, 1983 APPEAL DATE: September 19, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 042 - 83 APPLICATION No(s) : REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT: M-V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE: NONE GIVEN Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRFS OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 to R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION: DamiE ) APPROXIMATELY 400 rEr:1' EAST OF TALBOT ROAD SO. AND SOUTH OF SITE AREA: CAE2I2 FD' 6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : - DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : - IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : X 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X 3) Water & Water Courses : X 4) Plant Life:X 5) Animal Life: X 6) Noise: X 7) Light & Glare: X 8) Land Use; North: SIN(,T,F FAMILY RESIDENTIAL East : UNDEVELOPED South: UNDEVELOPED West : MEDICAL Land Use Conflicts: MINOR View Obstruction: POSSIBLE 9) Natural Resources: X 10) Risk of Upset: X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : 150 X 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 915 TRIP ENDS Traffic Impacts : MAJOR ON S.W. 43rd STREET 14) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities: X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics: X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures : 1(P/14.17N-' .t(ice Ronald G. Nelson avid R. Clemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director le-er./(' l.JZ PUBLISHED: SEPT. 5, 1983 Ribhard C. Houghton /APPEAL DATE:SEPT. 19, 1983 Public Works Director I Fr-C- Date circulated : AUGUST 4, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 9, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET E=CE - 042 _ 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : NONE GIVEN Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF SITECARR ROAD. AREA : 6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : 1 west : Land use conflicts :eL View obstruction : O 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 1111 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : v 13 ) Trip ends ( IIE ) : 7/2 traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation :9 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : C a c C e.Ss t-o p ff with K 7 n wn 1(.1 + Y moo. 1 r k 4PpTr i v urr, -1 c- ter ' w l .lZcE :SIerl CCt= s okieMY1cvN} ! V tt7CkV •tc> GVI --y C 41-O Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : eCln,47 t l itle : Date : zi . L. / s ev VLe' ms, 0 /tr5 dC C :5 L Ot_ br _g.t l tCc71 l41 - FORM: ERC-06 1 k1 1A-1-9 yet arld L afV-N-i-vy «Ts- 10 REI )N BUILDING & ZONING DE __RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 042 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : NOT GIVEN BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF S.E. CARR RD. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-10-83 0.ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : O UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT F-1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 9. 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : E-kJ INC ( C-' i G n APPROVED L : APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED r o PYto P C' 1, 1 I)y L ) hCd 1 c.y- i Cp ? 1 J p Yo , 1 t 9 a LC:-' l y r 1 a L_c a e - L Do `p7-01`r-Th pvo U d t Q, z /D sz/(:-47 e, 1 Ze" Y DATE :JJ rSIGNATURE0- DI RECTOR OR AU/THORIZED R@PRESENTATIVE 3/3 -5 i /y s--,ii.LJ..d OLi '"".Yrv u r ,anaft Fib 4 Date circulated : AUGUST 4, 1983 Comments due : i -'AUGUST 9, 1983 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEY SHEE ECF - 042 _ 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT :M - V PROPERTIES AUG $ 19831, PROJECT TITLE : NONE GIVEN Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF CARR ROAD. 6 ACRES gross )AREA :BUILDING AREA ( ross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : t, 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : F/ 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : L 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI v DOS More Information Reviewed by : l itle : L-rt„$ ,622LDate : FORM: ERC-06 REI IN BUILDING & ZONING DE. ._.3TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 042 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : NOT GIVEN BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF S.E. CARR RD. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-10-83 1 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 14/FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON AUGUST 9. 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : gkei/e r ,h APPROVED R APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED fsi ce 1. a cc e55 f D At icU a y s Gc rt oi 10e Zr" \0 0- 7-6 u i r c re Plow ,6 e o (/`4 aC /°/11° y -D!'15 a c_atd' 41( DATE : g"'1 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A HORIZED RE R NTATIVE Pc)L I Cj Dev. Date circulated : AUGUST 4, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 9, 1983 ENIVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 042 _ 83 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-051-83)Milli J • 1983 POLICY PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT'DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : NONE GIVEN Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF CARR ROAD. SITE AREA : 6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 4' 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : K__ 3) Water & water courses : i. -` iw 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : ./ l T east :_ south II JAW t west fiLanduseconflicts :e/ 4, lire e/%f.J/,/!. View obstruction : /Am&e.., 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : kc- 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : i traffic impacts :f N 14 ) Public services : wA 01FAM 15 ) Energy : I . 111111111,1111 16 ) Utilities : 6 17 ) Human health :j .111 18 ) Aesthetics : 111111 ,'e , 19 ) Recreation : Illi, i /, , 4( 20 ) Archeology/history : All COMMENTS : tweAfj e G s //r. 'C; 4474 '0/?c s h/-34 et k 4* feswee e ksele)7 Recommendation : c.al 40! t)O i More In ormat- ic n 11(71..Reviewed by : 0/ / titleAP Date : ii, FORM: ERC-OC 4 REIS N BUILDING & ZONING DEI ITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 042 - 83 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-051-83) wu(i O ' ptT 19R rT3PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES 1/FLc%MLI CY r PROJECT TITLE : NOT GIVEN BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF S.E. CARR RD. TO : l ] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-10-83 U ENGINEERING DIVISION IJ TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT NPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT in OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 9, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 6,14.0)te.4 tOi t allow DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE D UIcinu S/1QR tVC3,I NItER.1067 . Date circulated : AUGUST 4, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 9, 1983 ENIVIIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SWEET ECF - 042 _ 83 APPLICATION No ( s ) . REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : NONE GIVEN Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF CARR ROAD. SITE AREA : 6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :1.7 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : V 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 4./ 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS :O c.4-),,____ c,e,„, cla Le_ 4)A cd 4 5 fie.6-e Recommendation : DNSI_f _ DOS More Information X Reviewed by : a v I l itle : Date : eilf it-3 FORM: ERC-06 REr N BUILDING & ZONING DE 1TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 042 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : NOT GIVEN BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF S.E. CARR RD. TO : I ] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-10-83 1SqENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 9. 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n AFPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED c 114 c1 4 A 4 c R1J51N Cetic; Qta1 DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Dcvt MAN S/1989 DVILvIv.Ic4 1, 4aor.I1tiles r Date circulated : AUGUST 4, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 9, 1983 ENIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 042 _ 83 APPLICATION No (s ) , REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : NONE GIVEN Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF SITE AREA : CARR ROAD. 6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (% ) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : ix. 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X 3 ) Water & water courses :X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : x 12 ) Number of Dwellings : X 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : Z'a2L //V F-v 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : Y 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : 2102-e- /-v i-o / 5 IL)Q ©'1) / ,.42C-75 Recommendation : NS _ _ DOS More Information_ X Reviewed by : title : Date : A— /d —?) FORM: ERC-06 REN N BUILDING & ZONING DEI TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 042 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : NOT GIVEN BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF S.E. CARR RD. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-10-83 ENGINEERING DIVISION l ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU DPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT R1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ROTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 9, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS l ( NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CY7ILIIIEP, r Date circulated : AUGUST 4, 1983 Comments due : AUGUST 9, 1983 EMIWIROMIEMiTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 042 _ 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : NONE GIVEN Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF CARR ROAD. SITE AREA : 6 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 4' 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : T 9 ) Natural resources : V 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : V 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : V 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : f 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : f + DOS More Information_____ 10),) Reviewed by : Title : Date : g/5/83 FORM: ERC-06 REP N BUILDING & ZONING DE ITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 042 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : NOT GIVEN BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF S.E. CARR RD. TO : I ] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-10-83 Li ENGINEERING DIVISION I ] TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU l ] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON AUGUST 9, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Tic(-6{ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I MTV APPROVAL SOW TO LATE COMERS AOREEMEMT • WATER LATE COMERS ARREENEMT • SEWER YG-S 4-1 I II.26"/F.F'• SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CURSE • WATER yG5 ' I7.Scs/ Hwt SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHANCE • SEWER yCS s t7S°= uk'T SPECIAL ASSFMI;.RT •. !: .n eCl v; .Y SPECIAi A: ';e?i.t;t.. t'..•... . _ c.tiN . r._ ..— Y....-.wr wr r APPROVER <ATLA r ilia YES APPROVED SEWER PLAN 4E5 APPROVED FIRE MVORANI LOCATIONS IV Flit SEPT. FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS OF DATE 'q-10'0 SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RFVISIAN 5/1982 RER . ..N BUILDING & ZONING DE1,..ITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 042 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-051-83) PROPONENT : M - V PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : NOT GIVEN BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 6 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO R-3 FOR A PROPOSED 150 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX. LOCATION : LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF TALBOT ROAD S. AND SOUTH OF S.E. CARR RD. TO : I ( PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8-10-83 El ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 0 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 111 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ri BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 111 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 9, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED I .....74,,zet ..,444.4.4.4 -.4.clo /Ll- • 12Z ' 40.40- i. 6 'r'ltd o¢sa - ff#"47011,eaf Z. 4411 1- motre4e't4". 3. .,,10,4rAFAjl-t- DATE : 9--/` -83 SIGNAT R OF DIR TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE t ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 10, 1983 THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM: COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. PENDING BUSINESS: ECF-u18-83 AUSTIN COMPANY SP-029-83 ECF-033-83 EVERGREEN WEST PROPERTIES C U-037-83 V-038-83 C I BUSINESS: ECF-023-82 JAMES W. DALPAY R-033-83 Application to rezone 11,625 square feet of property from R-1 to B-1 for proposed commercial use; located at 4010 NE 12th Street. ECF-034-83 VIP'S RESTAURANTS, INC. SA-042-83 Application for site approval to allow a 9,206 square foot. sit down restaurant ("La Casa Rea'l"); located on the northwest corner of Rainier Avenue South and SW Grady Way. ECF-040-83 LAMES ROUTOS B-296 Application for building permit to allow construction of a 11,200 square foot warehouse; property located approximately at the 4200 block of S 43rd Street. ECF-041-83 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD PROPERTIES, INC. SP-048-83 Application for special permit to allow a truck transfer facility for unloading automobiles from rail cars for distribution by truck; property located on the west side of Oaksdale Avenue SW at the 3800 block. NEW BUSINESS: ECF-042-83 M-V PROPERTIES R-051-83 Application to rezone approximately 6 acres of property from G-1 to R-3 for the construction of a 150 unit multi-family complex; property located appxoximately 400 feet east of Talbot Road S and south of S.E. Carr Road. ECF-043-83 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH C U-053-83 Application for conditional use permit to allow an addition of two 12' X 56' portable classrooms units to an existing church facility along with a parking lot for 94 cars; property located at 2640 Benson Road South. ECF-044-83 WALTER R. TOMASHOFF B-297 Application for building permit to construct a 16' X 24' log structure off-premise sign; located at 601 Rainier Avenue N. ECF-045-83 ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. B-295 Application for building permit to allow a 10' X 25' off-premise sign to be increased in height to 42'3"; located at 423 Airport Way. Environmental Review Committee Agenda August 10, 1983 Page 2 INFORMATION: KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A Declaration of Non-significance has been given to Peter J. Modde to rezone property from Community Business "P" Suffix Site Plan approval and Suburban Residential to Community Business, File 234-83-R; located in part between 105th Place SE and 108th Avenue SE (SR-515) and between SE 178th and SE 180th Streets (if both extended). A declaration of non-significance has been given to Virgil Rogers, Sr. to rezone property from Suburban Residential to Low Density Multiple Dwelling, file 235-83-R; located on the east side of 108th Avenue SE (SR-515), 300 feet north of 208th Street. A declaration of non-significance has been given to Iona L. Mukick to rezone property from Suburban Residential to Community Business "P" Suffix Site Plan Approval and Low Density Dwelling. Any comments on these applications are due by August 11, 1983. 4, Y o CITY OF RENTnN FILE NO(S): g -O5 —Lb co) IILDING & ZONING DEPAR' ENT EZr-d4Z•' 3 u 1‘- MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is o comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES M - V Properties REZONE*(FROM G TO R-3 2) q ADDRESS 1920 S. Puget Drive 1 SPECIAL PERMIT* Q TEMPORARY PERMIT* CITY Renton, WA ZIP 98055 Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE 2 28-103 3 Jr::: SITE PLAN APPROVAL 0 GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE From Section: NAME Justification Required C/D DEVCO ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 2691 - 168th Ave. SE Q SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP ED TENTATIVE PLAT Bellevue, WA 98008 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 455-1269 ED WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: PLAT NAME:NAME M - V Properties ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 1920 $. Puget Drive Q PRELIMINARY CITI' Renton, WA ZIP 98055 a FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE E3 Residential ED Industrial Commercial n Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS See Reverse Side 0 TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant G FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Multi-Famil Residential NUMBER OF SPACES: 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE QQ dIx SQ. FT. ACRES r AREA: 6.0 TOTAL FEES L#. Q Y , " STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE So P)APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: JUL 2 2 1983 f APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 126 Accepted 4 2 V S D Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: Q APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: Q)-. 7-./Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: Building aZi Design Eng. Fire 21 Parks Ef Police IGJ Policy Dev. U Traffic Eng.Utilities Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Parcel A: Lots 43, 44 and 45 of Scotts Terrace Addition Parcel B: A portion of the N 1/2 of the S 1/2/ of the S 1/2/ of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 31 . Township 23 N. Range 5 E. AFFIDAVIT I, A (pi_t being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized repr entative to act for the property owner, =owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT P AlAti_S. / (J--)CA-CI aer.A .A41.V Name of Notary Public) Signatur of Owner) J1 L ,te 168 Address) Address) 9g3ope City) State) (Zip) Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." t CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM cIT'( 01 RE,I 12N t ILI P W lis II W NI JUL 22 1983 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' BUILUWNC:, ..vr, ., : ' Application No. Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date:FINAL . date: 0 Declaration of Significance 0 Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers shoulo include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent M - V Properties 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 1920 S. Puget Drive Renton, WA 98055 228-1033 3. Date Checklist submitted 7/22/83 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton - 5. Name of proposal , if applicable : None 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : The proposal is for a 150 unit multi-family residential complex of twn story structures. The recreation facility will be a centrally located independent structure. Parking for the project will be adjacent to each of the structrues. 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The site is an abandoned gravel pit with no structures or significant plant life. The portion of the site to be used for structures and parking is relatively flat while the steep easterly portion will be unused and landscaped. 8. Estimated date for completion of the i.Ooposal : 1984 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : Re-zone approval and building permit approval by City of Renton. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See written narrative and traffic report. II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic X substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- X covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YET— MAYBE MT— d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X unique geologic or physical features? YES M NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? L YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion wnich may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES MAYBE TO-- Explanation: WP will stabilize, drain and landscape the easterly portion of the site. 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES TOTE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? YET- MAYBE c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or 9re ionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leacnate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? y YES MAYBE i i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?YES MAYBE NG Explanation: The gravel-clay surface has been compacted by gravel pit equipment which prevents normal seepage. Surface water will now be intercepted and directed to a drainage and detention system. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? X ES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or X endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? TES- MA— YBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBENO Explanation: 4- 5 ) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MATTE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or Xendangeredspeciesoffauna? YES MAYBENO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBEN Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Exolanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area?YES MAYBE NLU— Explanation: Y 5- 12) Housing. Will Lrie proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking?X YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MATTE NO Explanation: See traffic study for mitigation. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Some residents will have children that will need schools. Renton schools have excess capacity and need children. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES M YBE TT— Explanation : 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? Y€'_ MAYB P1X e) Storm water drainage? X yrf- MAYBE WC— f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding Xmentalhealth)? YES MAYBE NU- Explanation: 8) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x YES MAYBE NO Exolanation: 20) Archeological /Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 1 0-t"-4 signed), 1 Ai- ) name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 CAREAGE P.O. Box 580 Bellevue,Washington 98009 Phone(206)455-4990 Telex 32-8056 July 22, 1983 Mr. Roger Blalock City of Renton Building & Planning Dept. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Blalock: In connection with the rezone application by M-V Properties that was submitted today, we request that the application fee of $315.00 paid for the first application that was not acted upon be applied to this application. Very tr Iurs, Daryl onnell DC:do CITY OF RENTON ELE JUL 22 1983 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Pkt Q 4/2 518-2, '! I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. OWNER M-V PROPERTIES 1920 S. Puget Drive, Renton, WA 98055 B. DEVELOPER C/D DEVCO, Bellevue, Washington C. LOCATION One block east of the Talbot Road and Carr Road Intersection in the vicinity of the Valley General Hospital , Renton, Washington D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel A: Lots 43, 44 and 45 of the Scott' s Terrace Addition Parcel B: A portion of the North 12 of the South 12 of South 1 of the Northeast 14 of the Northeast 1,, of Section 31 , Township 23 North Range 5 East. Exact legal to be inserted in Ordinance. E. SIZE OF PROPERTY Approximately 6.0 Acres F. ACCESS Carr Road G. ANNEXATION DATE Springbrook Annexation on December 3, 1978 as per Ordinance 3268 H. EXISTING ZONING G" General Classification as per Renton policy for annexed property I. COMPREHENSIVE LAND West half of property designated P/QP or P-1 USE DESIGNATION Public District and East half of property designated Medium Density or R-3. J. APPLICATION R-3 150 Unit Multi-Family-Residential CITY C?+• nFNrON+ Br vi JUL 22 1983 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 1 II THE PROPOSAL Applicant requests the rezoning of a 6.0 acre site to a R-3 Meduim Density Housing for the construction of a 150 unit multi-family complex. Except for the steeper easterly portion of the site that will be landscaped, the site will be terraced downwards to the west for a series of two story buildings. Parking areas will be constructed adjacent to each building for the residents ' convenience. A recreation facility will be centrally located in a separate structure. All open areas will be landscaped to enhance the appearance of the complex and to buffer the structures from the adjacent roadway. The traffic engineer' s report recommends the main access driveway to be located on Carr Road approximately 130 feet east of the western edge of the site. A limited secondary access joint can also be located at the eastern edge of the property but this driveway is not required. All buildings on the site will be specifically designed to afford maxi- mum views to the residents. This particular site is higher than any of the land to the north, west or south so view potential must be maximized. III JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL This application for R-3 zoning should be granted in that it not only conforms to the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Policies but it is a reclassification that is both appropriate and timely. A. Comprehensive Plan The 1979 Southeast Renton Comprehensive Plan indicates that a smaller western portion of the site be used for P/QP and the balance of the site be used for medium density housing. Since there is a ready supply of land available for the P-1 usage and since this site is traffic sensitive, the applicant has chosen the R-3 designation as the most practical alternative for immediate construction in spite of the decreased land values in an R-3 zone. B. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies This application is in the public interest to be granted based on the following land use policies of the City of Renton: 1 . "Encourage in-filling of sites that have services and utilities in place. " This site had been by-passed by extensive development to the east within King County due mainly to the lack of adequate water pressure in the Valley General Hospital area. This problem has been solved and no additional services or utilities are needed for the development of this site. 2. "Encourage the development of uses that will be compatible with adjacent and proposed uses and that will be beneficial to the community. " a) Valley General Hospital - The majority of the 1 ,500 full-time employees at the hospital drive long distances to work due mainly to the fact that there is no local housing that they can afford. This developement will be affordable and conveni- ent for some of these employees to walk to work. As the hospital expands there will be an additional demand for afford- able housing in this area. b) Professional and General Offices - There is presently over 130,000 square feet of office space surrounding the hospital with an estimated 800 jobs connected with these offices. These personnel will likewise find it convenient to have affordable housing within walking distance of their offices. An indirect benefit of this development will be to ameliorate peak traffic congestion in this area as more people will be given the opportunity to live close to their work. c) Single Family Residential - Due to the continued expansion of Valley General Hospital and its related professional offices, the single family residences in the immediate area are continuing to appreciate in value. Some of these residences have already been converted to professional offices and ulti- mately this area will be converted to other uses. This project will further enhance these land values . 3. "Preserve as much as possible the natural characteristics of the land, including topography, native vegetation and views. " This development will convert an existing eyesore into a pleasing addition to the Valley General area. The highly visible eroded eastern hillside on this site will be fully landscaped and the scrub trees and underbrush along Carr Road will be cleaned up and corrected with good landscaping. The view potential of this site will be maximized for the residents with no detrimental view obstruction to the surrounding residents . C. R-3 VERSUS P-1 ZONING CLASSIFICATION Even though the increased land value of a P-1 classification more than offsets the cost of a required traffic signal (See Traffic Report) , there are some factors that do not make the P-1 classification a viable alternative at this time. 1 . Competition - There are too many sites at this time that are better suited for professional offices in the immediate area. See Location Map) These other sites are closer to the hospital and do not have the high traffic volumes immediately adjacent to their site. 2. Traffic - The traffic report indicates that a medical building on this site would generate 3,200 trips per day whereas the proposed multi-family usage generates only 900 trips each day. Even though the engineer can solve this traffic impact with a signal , it is evident that these medical offices would have to be built in phases which would make the front-end expense of a signal prohibitive. 3. Need for Multi-Family Residential - The Gateway Apartments located west of Talbot Road are now under construction and will be filled by the time this development is completed. Furthermore, the applicant envisions a different type of complex that will not directly compete with the other project. The applicant therefore, has concluded that the R-3 usage is a viable alternative that can be developed immediately following rezoning. It will expand the tax base of Renton and will be an immediate benefit to the commun- ity instead of staying vacant after zoning. IV ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM - MITIGATING MEASURES The following items are keyed to the Environmental checklist form included herein (See Exhibit 11 ) . A. Item II - 1 EARTH It will be necessary to stabilize the eastern hillside on our property. This will include the grading of the hillside to remove the ravines caused by water run-off (See Photographs) . The slopes will be com- pacted and landscaped to prevent any future soil erosion. The toe of the slope will be retained by a rock or concrete retaining wall equipped with suitable engineered fill and drain lines connected to the drainage system if this area is needed for a building or parking . The 20 foot strip of land along Carr Road will be cleaned up of brush and dead trees and will be landscaped to present a much better appear- ance. B. Item II - 3 WATER Since this site is an abandoned gravel pit, the level plateau area has been compacted by heavy earth-moving equipment that prevents normal absorption. In addition there is no vegetation to break up the soil . Consequently, small ponds and surface seepage can be observed on the site during the winter (See Photographs) . South of this site there is another gravel pit area owned by the State of Washington that is presently in operation. The change in absorption rates and surface water run-off patterns that we envision will be a positive change. We will install drain lines along the southern property line to intercept the subsurface drainage and direct it into our drainage and detention system. Secondly, we will break up the compacted surface of the site and landscape around the buildings and parking areas to allow proper absorption of rainwater. The regrading of the site will remove the ponding that now occurs. The detention system, designed according to Renton standards, will prevent any uncontrolled run-off that probably now occurs during a 10 year rainfall period. The engineered discharge will be tied into an existing 24" stormdrain under Carr Road. This stormdrain is tied in directly to a 48" manhole across the road (See Photographs) . This development will remove a water run-off problem that now exists on this site. C. Item II -13 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION See Traffic Study prepared by William E. Popp Associates, dated July 7, 1983. D. Item II - 14 PUBLIC SERVICES a) Fire Protection - There will be no need for new or altered fire protection services. Adequate water pressure now exists with the new pump station on 43rd Street. b) Police Protection - There will be no need for new or altered police protection with this development. c) Schools - Demand for schools will increase but the local school system has excess capacity and needs pupils. d) Maintenance of Public Facilities , Including Roads - There will be no additional maintenance needs created by this project. e) Other Governmental Services - None E. Item II - 16 UTILITIES a) Power or Natural Gas - In-Place b) Communications Systems - In-Place c) Water - A new 12" line was recently installed in front of the property. d) Sewer or Septic Tanks - An 8" metro line is in-place. e) Storm Water Drainage - There is an existing system to be tied into with adequate capacity. f) Solid Waste and Disposal - City services are adequate. RENTON URBAN AREA en'• 717---.-4L, I r-- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • ,-----. ,--1 ,:,,,, 4.- REVISED JANUARY l. f380 r r• 1 7 1-"- -•••\-*": 6C:•‘: L:. :"----- ,-,,,,_. ....--, lk---f, 22''''---i -2, •-• I_ ;!* ,t--7 ' SCALE IN!IV stri— I LEGEND CO Licor, ittousTRY oPi 0.4-t•GING,' FAMILY Low DENSITY MULT FAM 11.1 mE a V Y "1--:--7. iMEC " " . = MANU 1 ,—FACTURING PAP L9v7--, - 11112 roc,. " 1:= R• ECREATION IN COMMERCIAL 1 G• REENSEL7 t -'4 •. am &u.,.,, & ou&s,...,,BLIC , —, 4 7 4- I' k . I•-•.';1 s ! IAIIK:14-7 7 . - 1 1 ''.=.7 LAKE r- ''''' '. - VASHINOTON r...... x>.,.-- 4 .,. d . " : •..;, -— -, ..-..-.1------_--- - .'•,. __-- •.- 1 1 t. j-L` "•-,4111= N,„ t —_,_ 1.14 .:,- 3.,,.--• L. OF •--- :••• 'L‘--- ,__....- l';,;:, , ' 1 i 7 if- ‘Vt:--- -.------.4-, ) ';': **Pt '1 * . --- ."'. s;,. - t•,.. -Y, *;,.•at.11 iv•••i* t,IV •- • • -;.?••.1*, ••-* 1 - - - - • -z:-. . • • -11 4 kiiit a rs.,->aal AP'' ' . ... . . ..... r -,, i -...- ___ 0 4 1....... -7-- = -- as yit 0.: t ti*, •---*::. 1. .. ...- -- LP's\ r---_m: s... ..__ 4.... -....z.....,::::::.::::•••..... L.- IV.•:.:.7..::::••• • V..' - ...............,:eria,.. . ...a• •'''' ,--) rii'N•-•:- :.::„...., r.,'•,' •:. --- ''.-..:.:.....:%. Cl .. ittettidegerfi, .41; 1.-......:•:: ,__-, ''W- - •_..,•'..._-_ -....,„„ , 1 \tz.,..,,2-- •ty - .-1 • •-"- 11;iip,.. . -.-‘, •. 7. 4. 4z.-411.,,t.:.i i.: ..... 1... h.....••.:-.•...........................::::•-...:::::'...:::•...........,•:: t• ..• :.- ', , 1.4%•.- .---------.. 1 •' , " \„.T!..:, 1/0 iRs' :!'',!i i: :-.•.:Y.C...:::::::::::.' ',----7111. . . :• ... ,'",;_•:....., ,,,,,,, .4........... \\,,....., 1:::;: •:::::::::::::::.......;;::::i .1 - 1'-' 4•• ,::, 1,., _,:-...._,_ ,..„. 4:: ... ., : n ::::„.....:.:77,-.\' I 1._ '-t•• 'et -1 i Vk•••• i ' '` i ,_ 74:::Z.. . .:-1:<;.- r'' , --.n--,,Y.---17 77.7;>'•---,_,.,-__ ''' ,':-'-'• - . 4i . ............................ i.:::,...,:.::-:::::::.... ,.,_ _ ... , - ,. ,‘, ,._--,-...4.. ___. .._,,,,•,,..‹. ,_ 4. :.:.---ir 1::::-::::::: •- c 01016811111bu_. .;al...."•••••Y ..........::::::4 :/.•:..........::::://::':::7*.•;::::':.2. '1 : > tir..11.41:;.. ' „LI -! \\. ''''' ''i'•, L.._ I •.‘,....k:•.•:::1.•:•:•:•:•:*:*:•:•:•:::::•411t ' 2# r'''.. -tr--- - 711 -,;:\.\.\•,\', .‘,,•.;:f--1.-- ---H.)---- 1- i i i 1 , . V/ i.• •"",..,_ • ' ._y_, 7••• 1C,4:-•:"''' ` j 7 GiAk; f.:‘ ......;, 7 i r--- 1.111rI C-.-4-• •4 .'' j P- 1 MI Oh I ' 1 r 4 7.. rtill,' V2,..,... td I 1:. wi-1 Q who& • I I tl,_ritt. _ ir.__, )1 KING COUNTY ASSES9OR di OVION Ian .6/I 11141 It.l. UM•• KING Criu N I y watu.,......., PAPAPIa- a ow.•••• ta.••• Th-ej .se as n+ NE 31 —P3-5 ...,,,tv, i: ir! - pp-./.•••,-. i 7 . .ig........ L.-,;-.... . 1 —..• 1- 4. 1., 1 1\ 444C if: r L.2...7"-.•.....••• •-,-•••,, i...•,• 4,.4,1.,",-";„'....,I1 7: 1 f771 b--1 OM WI,0 1111.1111.00•10 t i, i ' 7 + • .• .... t,%••• ao"---. t ; i T., It-. :: /..., "'''. ' !fr.".:.d'7,.. 1.°... 114:". j....- • 9600 f I i •- ••• ''' •••••• •••:' . 4 •we _,,, '-- 1" - IL.•.•' '-'..f• . 0.- 4- 00.,...- •, , .•it .. 1 .:r . 1 1 0 -4 0. ••• le. ---..m.' • ......,.... 4:ii;.:. .nic• r;::,.. i., \?? t,53,-:::;;; •••••-•••- irrev41....i... 1.. 7,;;,..7......4.,::„.......-- G.-..-" t:I.t a,a'.-*- 4, "' a.;7.caw il7,7,7,;,':::_:!..-n 71 41111.111.111116': -'''''''-:" 7-------: 11:::;" 7."#::# 1:± 1 I a...,/7/..10z....• i 40 VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL 1 a:. a wr "... • 1'-. r......,. 4. e 0. f.iiid°1641°1 t I 1 I I scry. • , I ." P.21 .:::: ...::::•Irer, • ''":„..'j;','' t. 111Lb?Z 1 z - . .. a I II o'l, p.'' r 5R 7200 4111 ' I C 14. 4. It ; 1 1, 1' IS .. . .i,-• Lrp• Ic-• i --':•; • - ,.re,1''I' Itf J.:...‘" 1.- i•zo- • --•)•"'"- I•_.r.• 1 :1---—-.Ner's--4 d's r-.-- s: W'..—.., ;II-i 11-1 i .!I_,- i--t.-r------2_ - - f- - . •.11111111014—e1.. — 1I , I i A!. ti ....awl i o r 9 • 1 ' I . p-.1 i I fitd el,\E • ) I ,. • .eA:.j. I i Ms2 frfe.-Pi CAL- 1 i I Jr r rum : A .... ti i 5 ir it 1 , 1 7 , 1 i:.._ _ li •''; Ii 0 N VALLEY PLiCE 6 47 I___,..4_ III,4r-i I. .i..--...: II;i. IL AI MO. 6,S,1 i'• on.W..,... : AA.. • or :. r.,,, 9 VALLEY VILLA CARE CENTER 0 r. GENERAL , I 1 ii 1 i s I 1:I, .„-..., •...c =.. _.tr,/..0 A c,.:.•'' 'I i.. J 4. 325 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE k W. 1 _ 1 4, I I I 1I i 2.3 ri, r? r;fi. \‘‘'M I I n ...: iPil , 22 o i. :. t. ELJ s.. itpsr.4 Ri-s2 5/.0 11-/-:.:4 14.90 elit,••.•• •• s I , .,...,... 7 . e 13-EG/N PROJECT 14 —. _"'• I 4"'• REG/A/ r A AI PP0a A./o 30900) 1. lb• . ..' ,i 4 n 'V nalgr. • 1••••-„/ ' ,,., Th ,- ... 1 ' 7.. •^ 0 07 " 1 ------ s ,-, , r r Q xl-ks •--t.,,,i* 1 ..t:f o, '' s`to , - ,,, 01 10 1.r.2,,, Pr,.•,. _go... I be- b'..11:If4rUZ- r• - . 1... . 140itr ---..1. , r V. .• •••,Z.,.:'.„:- iri:',....•... (g)-' 4 -- Zi''''' F.,,, I. 1 ••••,'••‘,". it , , .._ i•-1' tasi ez' -" i•lk,... ._' 1- - ':----":''---''' o.-•.• 1 q.... 1-.‘ t.1•!''''' r•.,, S. if4t1'',,; .t., i k% o: 4 1-.-•_.. i4 iI—.,•',-•,4•"...,. z..,. 41,., 4..%• 0.3 C.. 4'••,!'. 1/4(:.9- iAi, er,, 7.....,...._ P, ,:: O(. r 4 s 4.i..,,' 1 e..:"".,,,;:::71-:1.',!:,70-4' 00•••• 4 ...1 ,:o..1.' 0 4,• 11r.ve.\---/ .....""•...: - 111%, 77;7° w' 0 e;'),e.,, I AV•'.''.• 1;-t it..., Nf. 7._ ft ',Y.,:.....1,,NG COUNTY Ofirt Or IMM W011 ., 2 .. . ..• 1 i II•••••• 0,41'100 3., ',A.,, 41 111111. - • Ilk 7 . CARR ROAD Vr,,,5 e. ay._ t •••••.... 4•044......t.st •,.we hlk...4••••1,.. ”....... c,,pg.•,... . I 0,AD t‘t .gi 411'5 4.•i°.;744.4 6:1) 11_,...,..7 7.!•,..- i I' i ...•?..:•'•:.. ...- r'....7"41•4' '44 1 .. me. 1 2 1 . • tem,.MY•••••••• S••••••• tP ow , Snag.. stamyttntatoto etym..it. ?011...11-1.17,i7 .711.11i•T...:... E•t... Ire Peel 1.71f 1 at4r.,:r...v•e•••-.'-'. N.. • CONST 1_STAT ONS VQ•4 1 C•••••••• I,.. CL EARING e GRUB BINO LUMP SUM ii I VP/CAL P04061/A Y SECT/ON 41.1•t WI ••• i' 4.,,! 5 ,,,. 1 1CCAS 1 % j SIK.0.0.40 r i 1 . I 1 0:- ch(Na a t I ,.01 4 1- 1 i 14' 7 t 46,Il ,,• ,• WI ' 3 ca.rti ; I I •1 1.01.i..‘.. r a t I 1 e , r 1..nic, t 1 V o • i 0. f J, k.' .11 ••v., 30 ..; 1.•.. "''''. Z VP ... 1 r, I; /1.• 11 1 r . .,o 1.71 0•,.. * 2•••••••••• gr • . ...IQ.) I, :... 1 :. ‘! e e. ll If 1 EXHIBIT 2A 4•••••••••••••• r...14.4.4.416.4 cotte w44.•••••N• WM ef.•••••• 1 ' t ail 1211 ce ROADWAY EXCAVATION /NCI. HAUL 240 CV YDS 01.--.41--- I AIRA/s./A MFA/T 9,q47.7 Cu Y DS I II I I I 1 AFFIDAVIT I Gr+10$ e being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this day of N(:AC Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , residing at 2, CZti.'ti CS Name of Notary Public)Signature of Owner) l S '- c-, C5 t i.l F LLr. k 3 C I Su r' c'L 2_ 1:; , E Address) Address) a LkI City) State) Telephone) FOP OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by :-e and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By : Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 AFFIDAVIT I , Snu,_-r-r v De Nl) being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and 'answers herein contained and the informationherewithsubmittedareinallrespectstrueandcorrecttothebestof my knowledge and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this ' j•`- day of 111A:N: 19 - , Notary Public in and for, the State of Washington , residing at F-/A v\C` CTRA.-(--',„. s.\ , i;C i k ,,_K. L.. ,.,)-)\....i ,.1.._ C\..., 11,0 . ‘ '...t '\...,. .ii t /.. _L .k__.--A Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner q,)', 1 —U Address) Address) 7. 1 k. • City)State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By' sa Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 k s r 7. i r kk r• F•c 1.''t EASTERN HILLSIDE , , t.. I$' g . [ I C. E. 1 " r .) •f -'t*1 • 4 ` . .I.0' } ._ dr. k . 04 T7 M J • t a c i t v 7 t . Yt' Jd 07. ti 4., I, 4310.1*, ', i'.', , , : ,,k t:rrlk , , 'i.: . ' SOUTH PROPERTY LINE t; y tea i_., ;. 1..,... 1 v., s .4• --..4* _ ..G `lk.:- —•q•`; 4--.•.,' . 1 - «. -_ _.. jit gt y r EASTERN HILLSIDE LOOKING SOUTH ; •'^'! + si .` ,Y :% teli, '+ ,.,,,*.; s K i. t .- , It t, . T y,. 1ilejN,t'. j• \ Y..•.. i _fit."d, h N, 4 '` 40te ,"ir . y' rid . -,:.yy.. ' 4•.— - .Y - - 4 .lii.Y' • -f •• .4s. : ski w"*- -'.r a.- 0 t ' "' ..., ' 11.' i ''' tiliti... 7 l'., v i• r 1' 1 1' 1 Y r t' , 4. . y Syr t., ; r+ y i . i, ,. ttry vti .. L •. 7 rr ^ ij. , L - _ 1^ t• 4,, s, < 11 1i, C I a- h r(. c‘, I • :' fir,,. • • I t, t'' T ! ` Sr' i. 1 s lik; I I 7 , ,, Swfy •.. rr , t r 7•1 S l- P ,... ii) . E t; fr, . • Fe' el: . - l,.' Y' P ; l ill it fir Ai •\ S. ' 1 , . _ r' l-';'.-, r''' r::,:. 11\' .' 4„. , gyp.}'i. l l r 4 1, tv` r• N1 r 1 , J ,, ir/ .. 1 : t. L ti . • a 4+ ~ t• t1 1•;. r. ti p , f . 4., . ,, . i, t AA. A, rJ tY• 7 t.: f ' " '" e ' ! i I ' fik/ - 7. ,..' Pit " i. 4' 1 . 4 41h. • . 6' - ''" • f•, • ' • . 444:• 1 kit' f ,, to f'_. r. .....-. i, J 1_. 1„ fit,'! 1 • y•^' iy' r .,. F-U) I- Q U) W a W WIf-• 0 CC Z O 0 O Z 0 J 0 0 W Z J H Y N 0 Lt. 0 O J WJG2 4.00- 4,..„.' 44.- 4- 1- 1`` ' 4- • * • 4 1 ,j , r..,,,. 4., . r 4,- or IN. iii.,...‘.., •- .....---,.-4 Ah ; C .., Z:..,..... • •„L.1.181P 1.74" - - I Jilair •s if- _,.'.: ....moi ," i' - Nk--. Ker.._ ,mpr I III/•_,,,„ 14h it VI.1100rair4'4‘ ' -t 11' a" .11111 0.,. .i. 98TH & CARR ROAD ... , "'";. . . • ‘..c.aa% rvir...,,, • N.;,......, -'' - •• k. I Vilia V J\ ri. 4. .r'AIVI*• ). 41 iO4,- .}:.----;...., il...it fi: ., 4 • or"..."74111 r 7)p. 81z.t., ,,‘,.IP 1 0 I. - ---•AL i riAofilA if 4„,., :e..."... ://!- ;'• .. .1'' 47. . .; •A a„ ,•.-., :Ity , —'..),..t.; 2%,. ,-,..,A,N...,,.0 2,s,L.? -flp i W 1 p!'•,N , - 7,..,.. --. . ,, if fek 4. :yr • 13 Vivi 4,lip ..,...4 .NI 1 .,..,. .0,a, ,:,-A i'N: r " A ,4, 01. ...1i•••-• ' . •, !.:7'_...o!.441C411.;4 4. •, 1 • a, , , • 0 .1- r. i -i ,: '', • V. 1Z - • , .. .\ or i=*-- r .: i,-'-- N ,,, • ... , :I, , & •• ..• •-•-•. • .... -...s........,, •, -., ....,.. • ,i . .iM ti ' s •• •v 4 „ 114,0 im4-4s5-401,4te it if, 1 ir-------- --•;---, • ' - -.. •••,,,,,!. I:-to .- le'.•• • .r.''' 2 ‘ a...1 , 1 9 =4,1:4t,p ti - "...*:' ,.'-'4'" upsir41111MW . 1 11,r i • W. li 4,7',-- !11"lb."- 1,, 4:,.11....,%,'•V- • . 11• ,t 141g.-19.7'.tt.,4111 ir a,^ ,"'"Iiik I,:..,;,•,t,,, 1r : :..:. ..-,,,,;;;;;Arla,,, • I-a,g ...'--.. ., fie,0 , ! I 'i. V: . . 4ty; , • , . , re4.;••••'; •' -1.. - A WEE iTOTALBOTINTERSECTION d 4i ',Sr'..",''''''''.ft',19'°tit P ,,1% i'• ,",i• r 7",_,-;-. - •-.-• _-t:ti'...e,:...-- -_ -,'-.4141„e-4":;. i, 4 4 , ..,-•-•-7..---.,, -4.—_, .. ,--, _ 2— - ---..---;4,--,-=-•--r---22 -••••,:r?"-;- i- , -'.:L..: ,• • .1.4.. - - •:•.;,,i,te...-zr= 7.....• ...- -.4,..21-2.-- s-..--_-:-.. --_,- .,- - • - rIn'i.:T.,15.-1 ..--. .--44,..446';.4-fie=s?-.- 00..517;.•'iK:,,,:t.--...:,,„ ,',.--1,,_.'J - . 4-. •.. . 4...44'..•.:,...t.: -7.7...A. :.:-•.-. • •:--. 1,- •, .,,,,' .‘4,' ,.. r• ,1 k•= • i ' --•\ 4.1" n., 1,, :4-.• s, " -. ..,. .li;t: k -..•" . i.•• •;:.., , , tz, ,. : - ".• . . 'krt.: . -. - 1 :.4. '...:...'•!:••• 1 • il .0 '• . '. '' • "'. 4 .' I. .. Y.::1.0.4, ' .1 i - '. •-". •': ' •• • 't '''''•i.. ' .1 t.' ' ' . 'ct:•- 1 ‘ li 7.' 7. ' - ,,I, • li:' Itz.. - - `.' ;1--. ' 1,,:ef .'", • k;,_. ' ,:. : I.‘ 't lit. . ,. t V..•.••., ..%14, .. ..:. ....! , t'k a'" .ttki i "I. r''" ,X • 0. . . ;. ','.•A'. . '''.r.-- '.' • 1 EAST ON CARR ROAD . '' a •$,. '.art 1• 11 de.' ... • III!.'' 1 • •.' ' 40,./."/ ,', s -7: ,,,4,, ... I I ."-1, 1 . :',0" In* r•• ..=..- \ -.• - ,.,.,3,- ' ', k1:,..7::..,_•,..1...1.... i... '..::'.."... fk A.lb 1. f. 1' +. t,I,',. 1 .' ', '-,•11. • - .+ 1- # 0.,'. ,., , ib, • ', 4 ' — +.' , • , ., ." 4.-..... .' ... - 4" VEST ON CARR- ROAD 14‘-.0..,+', •.. 77..:i ,er.----- ''' e.....-:-..• '4....,2,...T!':'''. ..'. -.7.::.'!:.--* ..:-:e.'/.." 4',-'-:{C, -.-'-+:,;;;•,...,,f-f--.. .:.-i#4.-1•0' Ileto" ,,''. .:- ..•.-..:-:, -....-, i 1 ''/'. - I.' A II P1 ----4-,of,,,,,,, s,..:, •1,J" ,.• I I :,100,4., .+;i: i. I , .,,, . .1.,+. .i.A 1 I; 0 4. :lot.5c , , t'%; •:1.t:. . ,„tiiii j••:!..'' 04f. i• 7.L.7.m:s.:... 4;4,-•.. ..... .. , WEST ON CARR ROAD 7- ' 411811._ as..-. r- '•:,-" iiii' t , ' 1 ft '. `, ,,, %,&..44!1.,I 4. 1 r '4 '.#, ..41,041;1111. , •.:+_:,,q.• t.,.1+11,.._ •i ; 44 e i,:'il Iv 42. ..%.* i' '...', 1 P It ' F:..-.:Nt.,''.. S.TED 4 i'. . / LIMil 35 EAST ON CARR ROAD MO'.k a 7 •!:-.•-- Ali '',-- - - . i'.4:. '•- t: -•• ''. - ,. ' ,_'.;;'-,-"'•:' 2 .4.-.,-•- - •-."164Wr'''. ,. . .., - , • ..:•-:..•`: ',' ,,,,:-Itt,* 71;''' i F . 1 /I/ t' ii 1I' r -f,` Irki ye.-'f-- STORMWATER IN DEPRESSED AREA 5';,1;+--'r. jar• ' ', 1 t L. •` e* ` it yyyytttt Y 5 ;- : r 2 4" STORMDRAIN DISCHARGE i•• SYSTEM IN-PLACE e *=, 3 s. ,.. ` •• t'•• ' ''''.,,,144.‘1':'1;PA",‘^ . 4 . .'. iP- - . 1 • 1 ' . ,7", A4...: ,,; , ,.. . 4 A,!:‘,•0,• •--•,-,,. _ 4.••• iik, --Ai lii{ A., y'" y t .try sr. ,3 t" '6.. 44.4 s 5 tit ". IC it, Z. LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROMtii} v t 't `s . • ' '. .` ' a NORTH PROPERTY LINEt. ,• , v. ENDING OF FILE Fig nTI