Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA83-076 (2)J OF J A di -, THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 sal BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co• FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593o9** ED SEP1S4 February 2, 1984 I Mr. Tom Wielgos 2811 Mountain View Ave. N. Renton, WA 98056 i RE: File No::V-076-83; V-077-83; BV-085-83;-and SME-005-83 TOM WIELGOS Dear Mr. Wielgos: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on January 4, 1984 has not been appealed within the 14-day-period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being.transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Again, I must advise you that the State has final review authority over the shoreline permit and it will, therefore, be issued subsequent to the State's review. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. • uf man Hearing Examiner FJK:se cc: City Clerk Building,;& Zoning Department 0424E 1 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King SUE ELLISTON being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 4th day of January 1984, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIiBED AND SWORN to before me this g ' day of 114 1984. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: TOM WIELGOS: V-076-83; V-077-83; BV-085-83; SME-005-83 The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) January 4, 1984 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT:I TOM WIELGOS FILE NO. V-076-83; V-077--83; V-085-•83; and SME-005-83 LOCATION: 2811 Mt. View Avenue N. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks approval for a variance to Section 4--706(C)(4)(c)(1) to reduce the side yard setback of an addition to a residence from six (6) feet to four and one-half (4-1/2) feet, a variance to Section 4-706(C)(4)(a) to reduce the front yard from twenty (20) feet to three (3) feet, and approval of a variance to the Shoreline Master Program to reduce the rear yard setback from the shoreline of Lake Washington from twenty (20) feet to nine 9) feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on December 13, 1983. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on December 20, 1983, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following were entered into the record as follows: Exhibit #1: Yellow file containing the application, staff report, and other pertinent documents pertaining to posting and publication. Exhibit #2: Site plan with the revisions designated in red. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. Ike stated the applicant is requesting three variances to reduce the side yard setback of an addition to a residence from six to four and one-half feet, a variance to reduce the front yard from twenty to three feet, and a variance to the Shoreline Master Program to reduce the rear yard setback from the shoreline of Lake Washington from twenty to nine feet. He noted the Comprehensive Plan designates the area as single family residential and that the present zoning of the area is R-1. Mr. Blaylock further pointed out that because of the configuration of the lot and the fact that approximately 200 feet of the rear lot extends into the lake, the applicant is requesting the variances to upgrade and enlarge his residence to coincide with other residences in his vicinity. Also, that similar variances have been granted in the past (V-314-77, V-•4.02-80, and V-067-83). Mr. Blaylock stated that in view of the lot size, the existing conditions of the neighborhood, and the fact that the present house on the lot is much smaller than most being constructed along this lake frontage area, he does not believe this request would be granting any special privileges to the applicant, nor does he see where any public interest would suffer from it. II I TOM WIELGOS V-076-83; V-077-83; V-085-83; and SME-005-83 January 4., 1984 Page 2 Mr. Blaylock stated he believes the criteria for the variances have been met and the staff recommends approval of the variances and recommendation to the State that the Shoreline variance be approved. The Examiner then called on the applicant or representative for testimony. Responding was: Tom Wielgos 2811 Mountain View Ave. N. Renton, WA 98056 Mr. Wielgos stated he concurs with the staff report presented and that the surrounding property owners are in;support of his request to upgrade the neighborhood. The Examiner called for further testimony in support. There was none. The Examiner then called for testimony in opposition to the request. There was none. The Examiner closed the hearing at 9:25 a.m. and requested one additional week to prepare the report and decision due to the holiday schedules. There was no objection to the extension. The Examiner pointed out that the City can rule on two of the variance requests, but that the shoreline variance must be in the form of a recommendation to the State and they will then be required to take the final action. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Tom Wielgos, filed a request for approval of a variance from the Shoreline Master Program, together with variances for front, rear, and sideyard requirements. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents, was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), the subject proposal has been determined to be exempt from the threshold determination by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC). 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject proposal met with no opposition from the public. 6. The subject site is located at 2811 Mt. View Avenue North. The site is located immediately adjacent to Lake Washington and consists of approximately 5,380 sq. ft. of uplands and approximately 15,000 sq. ft. of submerged land. 7. An existing home more than 30 years old is located on the subject site. 8. The subject site is zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential). The site was annexed into the city in December of 1969 by Ordinance 2531. 9. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single family homes. 10. Variances from the provisions of the Shoreline Master Program have been granted to other properties in this general area along the shore of Lake Washington. 11. The applicant proposes enlarging the existing residence and to do so proposes expanding into the existing front, rear, and side yards. Variances are required since the applicant proposes a three foot front yard along Mt. View Avenue North, whereas a 20 foot setback is required; expanding the intrusion into the already non-conforming 4.5 foot side yard; and a 9 foot setback from Lake Washington, whereas a 20 foot setback is required. TOM WIELGOS V-076-83; V-077-83; V-085-83; and SME-005-83 January 4, 1984 Page 3 The 9 foot setback would actually correspond more closely with the side yard as the shoreline curves around the property rather than corresponding to a rear yard boundary. These setbacks, coupled with the sideyard setbacks, result in a buildable envelope of approximately 1,800 sq. ft. 12. Mt. View Avenue, the legal access to the site, is actually not centered along the right-of L way, and further is substandard in size. The residence is approximately 23 feet from the actual roadway and does not encroach on the paved portions of the street. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Essentially, the same criteria must be met in order to grant the variances. The criteria are generally defined as follows: a. The applicant suffers undue hardship because of the size, shape, or topography of the subject site which would deprive the owner of reasonable development. b. The approval of the variance would not create a special privilege. c. The variance is the minimum necessary to allow reasonable development. d. The approval will not materially harm neighboring property or the public welfare. In addition, the shoreline variance must not cause adverse effects to the shoreline.. environment and must be necessitated as a result of specific bulk standards of the shoreline act. 2. The limited area of the subject site which is not submerged is a definite topographical constraint which denies the applicant full use of the subject property. Without the variances, the applicant would be limited in expansion capability but probably would not be denied reasonable use of the subject site since a reasonable, though small, single-family house has occupied the site for over 30 years. 3. Neighboring properties have received similar variances and the approval of these variances will not extend to the applicant a special privilege. 4. The approval of the variance will not adversely affect neighboring properties which, too, have received variances of the same order, nor will it adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. 5. The approval will permit the applicant to develop a home of a size generally existing in the area. 6. The state has final review authority over the shoreline permit and the permit will be issued subsequent to state review. The applicant is advised to follow the permit process after the appeal period expires on the city's review. 7. While the variances in question do not appear totally meritorious, the precedent has been set permitting both new and renovated development along the Lake Washington shore for which similar variances have been necessary. The city, in the future, should more carefully scrutinize these and similar variances to guard against further extending precedents which have little justification under the circumstances. DECISION: r The variances are approved. 4 TOM WIELGOS V-076-83; V-077-83; V-085-83; and SME-005-83 January 4, 1984 Page 4 ORDERED THIS 4th day of January, 1984. VOA Fred J. Kaufm Land Use Heari Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of January, 1984 to the parties of record: Torn Wielgos 2811 Mountain View Ave. N. Renton, WA 98056 Versie Vaupel P.O. Box 755 Renton, WA 98057 TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of January, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before January 18, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in Judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for:review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate •in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. i'r-r;'••k, "'',"-' '.', .• .:' ', '1,- •. 1 ' , • ' • ' . • ' - ' r•-'- ''- ' •"' r•"•-:":"C-! 4f'-''-,..'. i . g ; • - r.,i'•!,—, .,. y-,-.-, 17,.. .. i.: -.,z:. :::&.: e:::--:; r17:(,7;:,--,,,;:-IVS. ; , .4:_' :',":-:-t-i:::,:•':--f.-_:-.:, „- ,-,- ._ .4-,„6,-:___,..,-;__ ,'-:_:_; ,'..,--,,,,-, ;.._:,d‘l. -,-"_'-'-'-- -iie- ------,;,-'_-:',':.-4,41its-,-.:,''.'- _.7.- ,-.,- '' ,•••'•'•••`'. .-' r•,,'" 7:".":. ""-- 3-f4-. • -':-""t'11--., ".'•;•'-,):::''''•*Ir,;"1-;:7""7'-' 4t''- 4'7', l'''';"O',"!1:-, ' "."-"': 2 " . , '--,;--- '..:,._ ' ' ';"'- k.,''Zg'44r.".7, . . 1 , j--."-:;.,'','-..--,,,-;,'-,',.';'„--. ' ",,_,...'-.. ., ,,' . -• i' ''"-. :-.'':-'--,..-1`g,-',"*.,.'"'4!•-:'''7' ': - A'':-.Vd-',--x.u,.. ,,,, J., T.:: - ..,, • .i.,,,„...„,,_„,k,,,„:,:_::,,, 3:: k'.' = ,•.,•',..,• ',••• ',..-- ',:--.;:' '.'--'. •n•-•"'-•- ' . • il 41.-?1,1W-:,--.0--"';-`: ...- -','-'-';f1.1'---q-- -: • ,g4',_„m„,..:;,4' 4' -:',,-,:-:.4t-;-- --1" 44t,r-js'r''''.''''.;''''',' '; i::4.--g-'''' • !''• ', 4 1 1,,•-•.-:;;-_4 As . t",,,,'• -,,.-; , — ', ",•,_'-',;..,,;,-,,,- .-',. • •-•• _-:•• t f,--,t1„-,--3,1, „Fg--4;,,, ,7•..--!•,"•,-„.0. -, -,-, .,,,,- •.... ----,--- li',.',:',' 4,';t"'•:•-•:-.;••••'..-.- ?••" , ;•" ,•-.•-_,"-:.,,,,,,- -* .• ,', • ..,;".,•--',.'- z;;•''•'::::', ,,„,-;"_"7,-;;;'-4-.'. •,1--, • •-•..„-•::u,'": 1 4":*7:::',-,-.•'-` '••;',-- --','--- -;,'-'":'''';•--'' '--:'.' . ' :.' f-'''''''''*,ifitlil.:1.:,•T'-',1,'. 7:' ";'''';:': '•••'i• -4.Lki..•,• .•.• • • _ A",;;;:".., ,".,•:. --:.;•••• • ''•'-"".-y-',-.AL,..:,., _ _,,..77---;_,-•,,::,-,-.---, ', ,- -,-'- i.-,-,-.- --_,--,1 I;2,-. 2 - --:-._- • -: -, - .-ia.1431_,,,,,:r.,,,,,:, '- - - 817° *7-'', 7'.---,1*-•',•••• c _ _ _ _. .T..___. . . CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 20, 1983 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. TOM WIELGOS Application for a variance to Section 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) to reduce the side yard setback of an addition- to a residence from six (6) feet to four and one-half (4-1/2) feet, a variance from Section 4-706(C)(4)(a) to reduce the front yard from twenty (20) feet to three (3) feet, and approval of a variance to the Shoreline Master Program to reduce the rear yard setback from the shoreline of Lake Washington from twenty (20) feet to nine (9) feet, File V-076-83, V-077-83, V-085-83, and_SME-005-83. EVERGREEN WEST PROPERTIES Application for a conditional use permit to allow three professional office buildings totaling 24,000 square feet to be located in an R-4 residentially zoned district, a variance from Section 4-709(B)(c)(4) to reduce the front yard building setback along South Puget Drive from thirty (30) feet to twelve (12) feet, and a variance from Sections 4-716(A) and 4-748(C)(5) to reduce the arterial landscape and parking lot setback along Benson Road South from ten (10) feet to five (5) feet, File CU-037-83, V-038-83, and V-086-83; property located between Benson Road South and South Puget Drive at approximately the 1700 block. BURLINGTON NORTHERN Application for special permit for site plan and bulk storage review to allow construction of a truck transfer facility for unloading automobiles from rail cars for distribution- by truck, File SP-048-83; property located on the west side of Oaksdale Avenue S.W. at the 3800 block. 0486Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 20, 1983 APPLICANT: TOM WIELGOS FILE NUMBER: V-76-83; V-077-83; V-085-83; and SME-005-83 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks approval for a variance to Section 4-706(C)(4.)(c)(1) to reduce the side yard setback of an addition to a residence from six (6) feet to four and one-half (4-1/2) feet, a variance to Section 4-706(C)(4)(a) to reduce the front yard from twenty (20) feet to three (3) feet, and approval of a variance to the Shoreline Master Program to reduce the rear yard setback from the shoreline of Lake Washington from twenty (20) feet to nine (9) feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: TOM WIELGOS 2. Applicant: TOM WIELGOS 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) 2811 Mt. View Avenue N. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 20,400 sq. ft. (lot includes lake bottom) 5,380 sq. ft. (land area) 6. Access: Mountain View Avenue North. 7. Existing Zoning: R-1, Residential - single family. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1, Residential - single family; R-2, Residential - two family; and R-3, Residential - multiple family. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan:Single Family Residential. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle' on December 9, 1983, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on December 9, 1983.. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject Site was annexed into the city by Ordinance #2531 of December 22, 1969, effective December 24, 1969, at which time it was zoned G-7200. The zoning classification was later changed to R-1, single family, with the adoption of the new zoning map which combined several single family designations, into one classification. The zoning map was adopted by Ordinance #3634 of June 13,.1982. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER TOM WIELGOS: V-076-83; V-077-83; V-085-83; SME-005-83 DECEMBER 20, 1983 PAGE 2 D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The site is essentially level. 2. Soils: Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC), 6 to 15% slopes. Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, row crops and for urban development. 3. Vegetation: The subject site consists of urban vegetation, lawn and ornamental plants. 4. Wildlife: The vegetation on the site provides sufficient habitat for birds. 5. Water: None was observed on the subject site. 6. Land Use: The subject site is currently utilized for a single family residence. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are principally single family residential in nature. The northern entrance to Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park is within 1,000 feet of the subject site. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water - A 6-inch water line runs along Lake Washington Boulevard North near the subject site. b. Sewer - The subject site is served by an 8-inch sanitary sewer force main located along the east property line. c. Storm Water Drainage - Directly into Lake Washington. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro Transit Routes #142 and #144 operate along Burnett Avenue North within 800 feet of the subject site. 4. Schools: Kennydale Elementary School is approximately 1/2 of a mile east of the subject site. McKnight Middle School is approximately 1-1/3 miles to the southeast, and Renton High School is within 2-1/3 miles of the subject site. 5. Recreation: Kennydale Beach Park is approximately 1/2 of a mile to the north, and Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park is within 1,000 feet of the subject site. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-706; R-1, Residence - Single Family. 2. - Section 4-722(G); Variance. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Renton Shoreline Master Program: a. Section 7.14.01B, Residential Development. b. Section 8, Variances and Conditional Uses. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER TOM WIELGOS: V-076-83; V-077-83; V-085-83; SME-005-83 DECEMBER 20, 1983 PAGE 3 2. Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Compendium, p. 40-45. 3. Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan 8, Residential Goals and Objectives, p. 14-16. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems: Some impact on the natural systems will occur during the construction period of the single family residence. Overall construction of the residence should not adversely affect the natural systems. 2. Population/Employment: None. 3. Schools: None. 4. Social: None. 5. Traffic: None. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, the subject proposal is exempt from the threshold determination of environmental significance. R. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3.City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4.City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5.City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6.City of Renton Policy Development Department. 7.City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS; 1. The applicant, Tom Wielgos; is seeking three variances to allow expansion of a single family residence on a 5,400 square foot lot. 2. The expansion of the single family residence is an allowed use under the general guidelines of both the Comprehensive Plan designation of Single Family Residential and the Shoreline Master Plan designation of Urban Use. 3. Two of the variances specifically apply to the zoning code in relationship to setbacks from public rights-of-way and adjacent lots. The third variance applies directly to the shorelines requirement of a twenty (20) foot setback for single family residential structures. FRONT YARD VARIANCE 4. The applicant is seeking a front yard variance to allow a three (3) foot setback instead of a twenty (20) foot setback under Section 4-706(C). The situation is complicated by the fact that the legal public street (Mountain View Avenue North) adjacent to the site, is off-centered to the east and is substandard in size. Therefore, it appears there is much more space from the edge of the existing asphalt to the front of the garage. As shown on the plan map, the residence is approximately twenty-three (23) feet from the roadway asphalt. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER TOM WIELGOS: V-076-83; V-077-83; V-085-83; SME-005-83 DECEMBER 20, 1983 PAGE 4 The applicant bases his justification upon the size of the lot and previous variances granted to Mr. Bitney (V-314-77), Mr. Anderson (V-402-80), and Mr. Ellison (V-067-83). The following is an analysis of the variance criteria established for review by the Land Use Hearing Examiner. a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The limited lot size of only 5,400 square feet and the fact that imposing this specific setback standard would only create an 1,800 square foot building area to be occupied by both the residence and the garage is an undue hardship. The standard building lot allowed in the R-1 zone would provide approximately 3,465 square feet of usable buildable area or 90% more than actually available on this lot by imposition of this standard. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. In general, the reduction of the setback and increasing the lot coverage will not be materially detrimental to other properties in the immediate vicinity because those properties presently enjoy a greater lot coverage than presently allow in the R-1 zone. Emergency access and fire protection can still be provided around the expanded single family residence. c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. In 1977, 1980, and 1983, nearby properties were granted similar variances to allow construction because of the _ limited lot size generally approximately 4,000 square feet in area). Denying the variance requested at this point would be inconsistent with the previous approvals. The variance procedure is an appropriate method to allow unique and unusual lots the ability to develop. It should be pointed out that the structure is 'presently a non-conforming structure with a three (3) foot front yard and the expansion would not create a greater non-conforming situation in respect to that front yard. d. That the approval as determined by the Examiner or Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. The variance is the minimum necessary to allow the development of the site into the individual property owner's desire. A garage of less than twenty (20) feet is non-functional. The additional six (6) feet that would be utilized at the rear of the garage would house the mechanical systems of the residence. Relocation of these facilities would cause a major redesign in the internal floor plan of the house itself. This is the minimum variance that would accomplish the desired purpose. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER TOM WIELGOS: V-076-83; V-077-83; V-085-83; SME-005-83 DECEMBER 20, 1983 PAGE 5 SIDE YARD VARIANCE 5.On the north side of the residence, the applicant is seeking a side yard variance to allow the structure be set only four and one-half (4-1/2) feet from the property line. The structure is presently only four and one-half 4-1/2) feet from the property line and the expansion would continue this non-conforming situation. The same variance criteria are applicable for a side yard variance as for a front yard variance. a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The applicant has provided internal drawings of the house to show that a jog of approximately one and one-half (1-1/2) feet would be in the middle of the dinning room and would create an irregularity in the actual design and flow of the house. In fact, the lot size again creates the unique problem of expansion. The lot is narrower (69 feet) than the typical lot allowed in the R-1 zone today (75 feet). Plus, the house has been off-set incorrectly when it was originally built. b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. The continuation of the setback will not intrude into the neighbors area any greater than it presently does and, therefore, will not be materially detrimental to the adjacent property owner. The reduction of the setback will naturally increase the lot coverage but this will also not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurous to the property or improvements in the vicinity. Emergency access and fire protection can still be provided around the proposed structure. c. That approval shall not constitute a . grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. Most of the other properties developed in the vicinity were constructed under the five (5) foot side yard limitation. Only a few of the very new structures within the; last year have been constructed under the new six 6) foot regulation. The variance procedure is an appropriate method to allow unique and unusual lots the ability to develop. d. That the approval as determined by the Examiner or Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that Will accomplish the desired purpose. The variance is the minimum necessary to allow the reasonable development of the site into a similar residential use as provided on adjacent properties and to the property owner's desire. s PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER . TOM WIELGOS: V-076-83; V-077-83; V-085-83; SME-005-83 DECEMBER 20, 1983 • PAGE 6 i SHORELINE VARIANCE 6. The state reviews variances for development on.the upland portion from the shoreline based on five criteria. The following analysis addresses each of the criteria: a. That strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards as set forth in the applicable master program precludes a reasonable permitted use of the property. The applicant has shown that without the reduction in both the side and front yard variances that buidable area would ,be only 1,800 square feet. This would result in a very small residence which is not in keeping with the other residences and deprive the property owner of like use. Typical houses in the area are in excess of 3,000 square feet. b. That the hardship described in WAC 173-14-150(3)(A) above is specifically related to the property, and is a result of unique condition such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the Master Program and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own action. The hardship is a result of the small lot which is only 5,400 square feet and the shape of the lot resulting from previous fills. c. That the.design of the project will be compatible"with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or to the shoreline environment designation. Other adjacent properties have been granted'similar shoreline variances under the criteria established in the Shoreline Master Program south of . the subject site. The Anderson residence was granted a.variance in 1980 (V-402-80), while the Bitney residence to the south Of that was granted a similar variance (V-314-77). d. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special priviledge not enjoyed by the other property owners in the area and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. The variance, if granted would not be a special priviledge. It is, in fact, enjoyed by adjacent property owners and others including Charles Unger V-112-80) and lii•ederick Kendrick (V-027-82). e. That the public interest will suffer-no substantial detrimental affect. Granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the general public and will not intrude into present public's use of the shoreline or create a negative impact on the adjacent Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. 7. The departments comments have been attached for the Hearing'Examiner and public's review. There is no opposition or general comments to any of the variance requests. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that all three variance requests, V-076-83, V-077-83, and V-085-83, b'e granted by the City of Renton. f ii I1em, I ,W 7.! 1 r , T9 N 17' t 1 f 7y Q n, lO.a 1,r r 1- .11 I 1 r r 95 T Ab II. . ' 7 . 7 6 S NAY idre ottrraf• 69 vi.o -- yy r i,,. n._I •r•1: :::,. 7 i\ L O l i rl.I.•.L.LIrL.i..L.FrL M40 I••If•I,•1.1•rlrlwlnL•Ir1,i be 70 1s !iI : 11II1y1111 rt 1• 11i11i111 , ! 1Ii111 rc rs IA i . 1 , 1"1 1 J f l i l 1 3 i 1 pi,,, rI I , r .T 1, s' ! f 1/ ;r L. , ri-T-r i 11F / , i.i1 { TTIi Ln 29 SiL' W v r J 9 ! T4 r', : {. 1 j i p 11 1 ' I , : I r.i a, --- e 510 F1I ' f 111 ? 111Tr11,f 1 ' I,lr i I z ,, 1s / r "•11r L,, 11Ii1II11 ; . • J I ; 11111 ' 1II,,) 6z c`_ .i ,L.:'L 1 ' 1 j ' 1ii ijl j ;J-I.I _.T-irk -° ST Billow i.i {., I, ,I +.fi4 1 . 1 --'-Li ..l ,4. 17 i 1I,r 1I '4^I. flI.: : r : : . r ! i • i1l > T[. j T I 1' • •' • L1L1111111..11 ! ! ' 11_1.1.111.11. I i ! ; 3 1 7., ...,. J..T r1 1 : I I 1 111 I'l f L' 1 r L 1 I 1 f 1 [3-, (1© i ; S= ''r 57 I 11+ +H t +H li1r• 1f ' ' -'' \ Ti I I114 _ 1s y l I 1 1 k. 1 y i !` ` KENNYDALE \. _-*\ A F'G 'I1T1111_.1.1 !ft1I11JiL _I, 1 4, 4 <9 5Ck 1 \Z Iiili.i 1 1 - L. dr IZ 1 7------h 1 1-:\ < -;;.N '•'' .;• 1of_ -1'•ur a© ii 1. ' 1 - - Z 75 1‘411‘tx:\.,,,,,,\,......•..... . .,., . •.- Isi„; 4 i 9/ q 7.) Ti __ . ,r,_;-.-s-1-4 ' !; t 11 Y, 1 1 Ip \ \ N a, rwir 1 'I i. T ABC I 'T TOM WIELGOS V-076-83, V-071-83 V-085-83, SME-005-83 APPLICANT TOM WIELGOS TOTAL AREA — 20,400 SQ. FT. PRINCIPAL ACCESS MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH EXISTING ZONING R-1, RESIDENTIAL-SINGLE FAMILY EXISTING USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED USE ADDITIONS TO EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY COMMENTS Maa%.# 04 y_F, ..ye M i cWvoe tD t MOTC a tree*a0uw amt.. mhos m+ao# Ilbe. OAS a dodo AYt, Romp tam), nsve&aR $sSe l sV13TNc n v r Dsrana,co,w+iec OMctao °oaT a DaDCD A MUM« 1614144501 Cf+acrrtou) ciriSLN of UGH tame motet i imGQNmt Wtyy6C, n ENS TIN1 , HOME1.44 LAKE WASNIML TON ADDrc1eb PitorbSED iv' Caput% vKiAnce) LAKE wAsaroacTai a' Nov; h Y REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : r ' ' VieFUE(4 '1t:A// APPROVED EPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS C., , EINOT APPROVED S DATE: /1/3 o/' -- SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR 0 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/18a2 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L D ZAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: __1-; 2SIUREOFDIRECTORORAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: F7a2e OAPPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED OF / DATE: /2/-a --F3 SIG""AT4 'E • , DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 DETERMINATION OF CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION UNDER SEPA Application No.(s):SME-005-83; V-076-83;, V-077-83; V-085-83 Environmental Checklist No.:N/A Description of Proposal:Application for variance to Section 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) to reduce the side yard setback of an addition to a residence from six 6) feet to four and one-half 4-1/2) feet, and variance from Section 4-706(C)(4)(a) to reduce the front yard setback from twenty (20) feet to three (3) feet, and an approval of a variance to the Shoreline Master Program to reduce the rear yard setback from the shoreline of Lake Washington from twenty (20) feet to nine (9) feet. Proponent: Tom Wielgos Location of Proposal: Located at 2811 Mountain View Avenue North Lead Agency:City of Renton Building & Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on November 30, 1983 following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building & Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Roger Blaylock, James Bourasa. David Clemens, Gary Norris. Richard Houghton, Robert Bergstrom, Jerry Lind & Ronald Nelson. The ERC determined that the proposal is categorically exempt from the State of Washington Environmental Policy Act of 1971 and specifically designated as being exempt under Section 197-10-170 of the Washington Administrative Code. Categorical Exemptions: WAC 197-20-170(1)(a) - The construction or location of any residential structure of four dwelling units or less. WAC 197-10-170(10)(b) - Granting of variances based on special circumstances, not including, economic hardship applicable to the subject property such as size, slope, topography, location or surroundings and not resulting in any change in land use or density. SIGNATURES 07 • Rofiald G. Nelson avid R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director chard C. Houg ton Public Works Director OF RA, • • • O TICEOpo 0 47. SEPTE-P City of Renton Land • Use He,a'ring Examiner will hold a in . CITY COUNCIL--'CHAMBERS,, •:CITY HALL QN .DECEN ER 20; 1983 . • • • .'"BEGINNING A T ,.9.,00• _ A.M. CONCERNING: ',FILE V-076-83, V-077.-83, V-085-83, S1 E-005-83 REZONE ..From •Toa SPECIAL LCONDITIQNAL USE PERMIT T.o r M. SITE APPROVAL I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVIS'I.ON of Lot PLANNED UNIT •DEVELOPMENT x VARIANCE FROM SFCTTUN 4-7f6O(4)'(c)(1).,_SiCTI0N 4-706(C)(4)(A) GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR .. ADDRESS;: ,`.. LOCATED AT 2811 MUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN .THE RENTON BUILDING, & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ; 0 SIGNIFICANT,. NON=SIGNIFICANT • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING&.ZONING DEPARTMENT'. '235=2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO •BE REMOVED • WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON DECEMBER 20, 1983, AT , 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: TOM WIELGOS Application for a variance to Section 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) to reduce the side yard setback of an addition to a residence from six (6) feet to four and one-half (4-1/2) feet, a variance from Section 4-706(C)(4)(a) to reduce the front yard from twenty (20) feet to three (3) feet, and approval of a variance to the Shoreline Master Program to reduce the rear yard setback from the shoreline of Lake Washington from twenty (20) feet to nine (9) feet, File V-076-83, V-077-83, V-085-83, and SME-005-83. EVERGREEN WEST PROPERTIES Application for a conditional use permit to allow, three professional office buildings totaling 24,000 square feet to be located in an R-4 residentially zoned district, a variance from Section 4-709(B)(c)(4) to reduce the front yard building setback along South Puget Drive from thirty (30) feet to twelve (12) feet, and a variance from Sections 4-716(A) and 4-748(C)(5) to reduce the arterial landscape and parking lot setback along Benson Road South from ten (10) feet to five (5) feet, File CU-037-83, V-038-83, and V-086-83; property located between Benson Road South and South Puget Drive at approximately the 1700 block. BURLINGTON NORTHERN Application for special permit for site plan and bulk storage review to allow,construction of a truck transfer facility for unloading automobiles from rail cars for distribution by truck, File SP-048-83; property located on the west side of Oaksdale Avenue S.W. at the 3800 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 20, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : December 9, 1983 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JERRY LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in the King County, on the 7th day of December, 1983. 9A( a SIGNED: oL 1' r . k Al 0 ,,,'• z•- • , .. t-,..., .a. 0 las , -- ,. . -.• 0 .. • ' *5.- " T - -'.- SEP1° 4' ' r ' .'' ' ''• -' , 9 -:','''';;?. P.' '.. , ' '' ' . - ' ' , , ' , • ; , r' .:'"':': City of Renton Land -.U.,se: He.-,aripT, Examiner - . ::•,' ..,..',2 will hold a' i.'' , • .' • '-• : r T_PUBLIC.:: 1,',..::-:'. HEARING• .• 4. U. 1 C I,' . "' '; ' '•; :': ;-:'' ', "'. ''''- "- .: . ' -- ::J:. :':. in,- '.', :.'.1'''.::::..,,: s:•."•: ::,•.:-•• •',' . ': , ,: • 2 r ' - • ',''' '.'',..''::‘ r::''' e... CITY . oPURCIL:C.HAMPERS,;';;;WY, HALL I • , r . ON. - •, .: DECEMBER .20, 1983.. : . ' • .' ',.E13EGINNING:..rAt9:•00. 'MA. _ •' , P.M. t , • . , COiNCERNING: FILE V-07.6.-83, 11, 077-', 3; -Y. -085-83, StE-005-8 • • :• '' ': L REZONE '- From. ''T6.,:,','' ,.''''' : • • - r, " SPECIAL fCONDITIONAL::USE PERMIT To • . • .. • . ' '- ', • 0 • . ' ' .: • . . . SITE APPROVAL • r - .' • •-':',.,.- .. -:.:.'.:' ; . I SHORT. PLAT/SUBDIVISION , of • • . Lots PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT , x VAIllANCE ;.FROM. 'Sk-TION 4-7061v.: (4) r,i(1)•.: S1CTION 4-705n (C)(4)60'‘, r , , , GENERAL LOCATION. . AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED AT 2811 MUNTAIN VIEW .AVEN 1JE NORTH - : . ... .. ' e , • . " 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING i ZONING DEPARTMENT. - ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION 0 SIGNIFICANT INOWSIGNIFICANT, ' ,:,-:. : -:..: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 'CALL;;,:::Iii0 CITY OF - RENTON ' :, r, ',:.„: ••,:,-',/„, 2, -ByILDINGS.,ZONIIING,"DEPARiMI*1141": 2 3 -2550 L •. .., THIS NOTICE 1\1011" TO Eie,: : Rk"itioNiebvvITHOU* mg!"CI MIMMI. A,1 1.1.14 on In i'7P"iir 0 ri.1%.1 I A. ty BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 ... MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 o94TF0 SEPt O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 7, 1983 Tom Wielgos 2811 Mt. View Avenue N. Renton, WA 98056 Re: Variance Application for Front, Side and Rear Yard Setback Reductions, Files V-076-83, V-077-83, V-085-83, and SME-005-83 Dear Mr. Wielgos: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November_ 9, 1983. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 20, 1983. The public hearing commences at 9:00 in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, C :— AANA\A-ck Roger . Blayl k Zoning Administrator RJB:se 0479Z DETERMINATION OF CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION UNDER SEPA Application No.(s):SME-005-83; V-076-83; V-077-83; V-085-83 Environmental Checklist No.:N/A Description of Proposal:Application for variance to Section 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) to reduce the side yard setback of an addition to a residence from six 6) feet to four and one-half 4-1/2) feet, and variance from Section .4-706(C)(4)(a) to reduce the front yard setback from twenty (20) feet to three (3) feet, and an approval of a variance to the Shoreline Master Program to reduce the rear yard setback from the shoreline of Lake Washington from twenty (20) feet to nine (9) feet. Proponent: Tom Wielgos Location of Proposal: Located at 2811 Mountain View Avenue North Lead Agency: City of Renton Building & Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on November 30, 1983 following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building & Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Roger Blaylock, James Bourasa, David Clemens, Gary Norris, Richard Houghton, Robert Bergstrom, Jerry Lind & Ronald Nelson. The ERC determined that the proposal is categorically exempt from the State of Washington Environmental Policy Act of 1971 and specifically designated as being exempt under Section 197-10-170 of the Washington Administrative Code. Categorical Exemptions: WAC 197-20-170(1)(a) - The construction or location of any residential structure of four dwelling units or less. WAC 197-10-170(10)(b) - Granting of variances based on special circumstances, not including economic hardship applicable to the subject property such as size, slope, topography, location or surroundings and not resulting in any change in land use or density. SIGNATURES R ald G. elson avid R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director g.„4//fIC) chard C. Houg ton Public Works Director RENT BUDDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - x - NOV 1 41993 x POLICY nPJELO MENT DEFT.APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORELINE MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION (SME-005-83) , VARIANCE (V-069-83, V-70-8 PROPONENT: TOM WIELGOS PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION. OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK OF AN ADDITION TO A RESIDENCE FROM SIX (6) FEET TO FOUR AND ONE HALF (4k) FEET AND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO THE -SHORELINES MASTER PROGRAM TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON FROM; TWENTY (20) FEET TO NINE LOCATION: (9) FEET. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG, DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT rd POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON NOVEMBER 18, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /3 /cv 46VE6oPirleivi APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED ILiz^ SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR/AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 3d/g; REVISION S/1082 READ BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - g - , x APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORELINE MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION (SME-005-83) , VARIANCE (V-Oe83, V-77, 8 PROPONENT: TOM WIELGOS PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK OF AN ADDITION TO A RESIDENCE FROM SIX (6) FEET TO FOUR AND ONE HALF (00 FEET AND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO THE SHORELINES MASTER PROGRAM TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON FROM' TWENTY (20) FEET TO NINE LOCATION : (9) FEET. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: IDENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT MBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 18, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : g( D APPROVED JJ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: / ./ -/9 SI URE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RFVICIAtdi s/10i32 RE- Bll I.DING & ZONING DEP^n FMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE HEET L J Renton Fire D:pt. fire Pr,:aoioa Pur:au ) FTEL ECF - x - x Es APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORELINE MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION (SME-005-83) , VARIANCE (V-07(p-83, V-77-8 PROPONENT: TOM WIELGOS NOV, 1 4 1983 , PROJECT TITLE : N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK OF AN ADDITION TO A RESIDENCE FROM SIX (6) FEET TO FOUR AND ONE HALF (42) FEET AND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO THE SHORELINES MASTER PROGRAM TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON FROM TWENTY (20) FEET TO NINE LOCATION : (9) FEET. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION e FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT EI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 18, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: FTt2 e EAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS D NOT APPROVED DATE: /// -F3 SIG AT E DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 0 RENT!! BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - x APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORELINE MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION (SME-005-83) , VARIANCE (V-069-83, V-70-8 PROPONENT: TOM WIELGOS PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK OF AN ADDITION TO A RESIDENCE FROM SIX (6) FEET TO FOUR AND ONE HALF (42) FEET AND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO THE SHORELINES MASTER PROGRAM TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON FROM TWENTY (20) FEET TO NINE LOCATION : (9) FEET. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT DBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EJOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 18, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE D UI Inu ai1cse,' RENTO6 UILDING & ZONING DEPA ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - _IL__ - _IL_ APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORELINE MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION (SME-005-83) , VARIANCE (V-0,7(p-83, V-77 83) PROPONENT: TOM WIELGOS PROJECT TITLE : N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK OF AN ADDITION TO A RESIDENCE FROM SIX (6) FEET TO FOUR AND ONE HALF (42) FEET AND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO THE SHORELINES MASTER PROGRAM TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON FROM TWENTY (20) FEET TO NINE LOCATION : (9) FEET. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFICEl ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 18, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :f'77 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Cr--- A,—_____ i 0 Wcg 3 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP•TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F x _ APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORELINE MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION (SME-005-83) , VARIANCE (V-07(v83, V-77-8. PROPONENT: TOM WIELGOS PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK OF AN ADDITION TO A° RESIDENCE FROM SIX (6) FEET TO FOUR AND ONE HALF (42) FEET AND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO THE -SHORELINES MASTER PROGRAM TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON FROM TWENTY (20) FEET TO NINE LOCATION: (9) FEET. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE ,NORTH. TO: OPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION OFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT DBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EIPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 18, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T/Llry .EA/GiA/,E. isiG. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED L,7Ri; i:` a.l Yl °11S:CCT 1U r LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER A/p SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER A/0 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER A/p SPECIAL-AUFis.MFHT AQFt r,t -RE _WA.TER, _.Nh rrzo 1 D w Zpa rJ NM BY FIRE DEPT. 1(D FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS AIp 111 DATE: SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - x - _L._ APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORELINE MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION (SME-005-83) , VARIANCE (V-01fr83, V-77-8 PROPONENT: TOM WIELGOS PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK OF AN ADDITION TO A RESIDENCE FROM SIX (6) FEET TO FOUR AND ONE HALF (4k) FEET AND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO THE SHORELINES MASTER PROGRAM TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON FROM TWENTY (20) FEET TO NINE LOCATION : (9) FEET. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT ID POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 18, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: I ,t9L E/VG /A1EE,E,11C--, U:1 APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PC-5 i2'DATE,: y SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZ D REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENA BUILDING & ZONING DEP TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - }c - _a_ APPLICATION NO(S) : SHORELINE MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION (SME-005-83) , VARIANCE (V-O7( -83, V-77-8 PROPONENT: TOM WIELGOS PROJECT TITLE : N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK OF AN ADDITION TO A RESIDENCE FROM SIX (6) FEET TO FOUR AND ONE HALF (42) FEET AND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO THE •SHORELINES MASTER PROGRAM TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM THE SHORELINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON FROMITWENTY (20) FEET TO N IIgE LOCATION: (9) FEET. 1 THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 2811 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION IITRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 0 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 11 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 18, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 10j APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EI NOT APPROVED DATE: //- Z/—. 3 SIGNA URE OF RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 0246N ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA NOVEMBER 30. 1983 THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM: COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. OLD BUSINESS: ECF-065-83 M-V PROPERTIES R-071-83 A request for reconsideration has been made for the Final Declaration of Significance published November 14. 1983. for the above referenced rezone application. ECF-041-83 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD PROPERTIES, INC. SP-048-83 Application for special permit to allow a truck transfer facility for unloading automobiles from rail cars for distribution by truck; property located on the west side of Oaksdale Avenue S.W. at the 3800 block. ECF-068-83 CASCADE PACIFIC DEV. CORP./SEA-VAN PROPERTIES PP-074-83 Application for preliminary plat and PUD approval to redesign and PPUD-075-83 replat Cedar Ridge residential park from a multi-family attached environment to a neighborhood of single family detached homes totaling 138 units; located at 1800 Lake Youngs Way S.E. NEW BUSINESS: SME-005-83 TOM WIELGOS V-076-83 Application for a variance to Section 4-706(C)(4)(c)(1) to reduce V-077-83 the side yard setback of an addition to a residence from six (6) feet to four and one-half (4-1/2) feet and approval of a variance to the Shoreline Master Program to reduce the rear yard setback from the shoreline of Lake Washington from twenty (20) feet to nine (9) feet; property located at 2811 Mountain View Avenue North. vY o rY OF RENTO FILE NO(S):. ,E' o as R3 07 co ®• BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT V- 0 7CD- ?3 billV- 0 77-K3' MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since.this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES r" - '1 Eq(9 QS Q , REZONE*(FROM TO ADDRESS g // Mi- I/l'B[.4) ,ta e /( . 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* k 1-K 1: b 5-6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE D SITE PLAN APPROVAL GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT 3. 3Z 13(h o.;v+e) z37-e.,,3,5 (GI)o hk)No. of Cubic Yards: VARIANCE y+?O(0/ C` `t'.dCONTACTPERSONFromSection: J oc. (C444*) NAME Justification Required j/A .4)(7,--&-e ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: Q SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 0 WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: h ,,,,,b- AD RDESSPLANNEDUNITDEVELOPMENT: Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP Ej FINAL TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME: ED Residential 0 Industrial 0 Commercial D Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 0/I ML , e e4 A Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE 7 V v 2/v PRESENT ZONING 0 PRELIMINARY FINAL e,,,,, !<<a l 1 PROPOSED USE f PARK NAME: qe-SI d el-lam r NUMBER OF SPACES: r 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. ACRES TOTAL FEES PiD e .' • AREA: gei40 STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING avJ DATE STAMP ; ,; ;I -_,r, APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: E r I`', h, I .L-i APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE. U Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). LS. P l Ieti ed AFFIDAVIT I,h,,-,. l icy S being duly sworn, declare that I am Elauthorized re resentative to act for owner,1oowner of the property involvedPpropertyPPY in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE-- ME THIS DAY OF P lk Il-Cit/ 19 g93. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT p,,Hte& 41A,i) Name of Notary Public)Signature of Owner) 433r cc. /77 Y7L Vt--eGo )1,1,4-N gfig'(Address) Address) duly 11, 1977 Order No. 426238 DESCRIPTION: That portion of Lots 79, 80, 81, and_82 in Block "A" of Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 1, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, on page 63, records of King County, Washington, and of the shorelands adjacent thereto as determined by decree entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. 156371, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Government Meander line with the South line of said Lot 81; thence North 51°21' 04" East, 32 feet, more or less, to the Westerly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way; thence Northwesterly along said margin 69 feet to the most Easterly corner of a tract conveyed to Frank Tonkin -'and wife, Sybil, by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 4343188; thence South 65°50' 45" West, 20 feet; thence South 50°55 ' 04" West, 36. 07 feet to a point on the Meander line; thence South 50°55 ' 04" West 47 feet; thence South 63°38 '.40" West, 222. 51 feet to the Inner-Harbor line; thence South 40°35 ' 00" East, 65 . 07 feet; thence North 62°15 ' 42" East 224. 02 feet; thence South 46°34 ' 00" East 10. 82 feet; thence North 50°36 ' 04" East, 50. 70 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT portion thereof lying within Mountain View Avenue. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. OF R4,4 0 z SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 o CITY OF REN -TO ,N , 9TFO SEPtE . BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT: :, 206) 235-2550 NOV 9 1983 APPLICATION FOR: OFFICE USE ONLY: Application No. ;c5me-.6 cis R5 1/- 07b 4,3 ECF No: tsam Q•, v-0%5-? 5 SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT Sec-Twnp-R £ 1I2A 3 F S PERMIT Date Received Date Accepted 1I1 a q Li CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Date Approved Date Denied VARIANCE Publication Date AFF Comprehensive Plan 13.441Ly EXEMPTION Zoning R-1 61QC.A1E: Water Body LIM is VJ -VNCI In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The .zoning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application (note permit procedure on the last page). APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 14 BELOW: 1. Name of Applicant .-y,4_, u(1J ce, L cis AA I 2. • Mailing Address 2,eii /v1I 1f taw ,/Le N. L) _ 90:3Q 6, Telephone: a3 5 --3 ! 3 ( I•toP;n.e 3. Applicant is: 237— 60 t vdvk Owner Lessee Contract Purchaser Other (Specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: Telephone 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) Z.e3 t l -Mt Vle i i e,y+o,y,, J 6. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : See 7L ela I 7. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands: 'Lk LA)..„ 5 8. Intended use of property: R Ie&lice 9. Generally_ describe the property and existing improvements: w..44-ey rvir•4- 4d-- cki -tM9 L die 10. A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project include additional developments /contemplated but not included in this application: 45.)0-00 Oc.+W,,rter-1iu, /A k- r e),5 c d imp I eT 1 o evn B. Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested: Begin End tQ/1?'"F 11. Does this project require a shoreline location? Explain. 1::: xis rr3 Wce 1 s cP,14 'J-a $ JIor a - , " 1 etr2 Me J- I.c OC 1 )dM 1 S d y e e 5 l,xD ire L'I,74e - 12. List any other permits for this project from state, federal , local governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and number of the application -or permit: J JGt CCliv i/41If 40 L, I 101l©C _I v 'Jro/Wl _e J 1 C I T,4 G 1 e/a^+c i' 13. Site and vicinity maps (refer to application instructions):s-ee c,GP 14. Additional information: 15. VARIANCE CRITERIA If the applicant is seeking a variance, the applicant must include a written justification) narrative addressing the following criteria as specified in Section 173-14-150 of the Washington Administrative Code: A. Development On Land. 1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable City of Renton Shoreline Master Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable permitted use of the property. a 2. That the hardship is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for. example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. 3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the shoreline environment designation. 4. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. 5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. B. Development either waterward of the ordinary high water mark or within marshes, bogs, or swamps: 1. That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable City of Renton Shoreline Master Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable permitted use of the property. 2. That the hardship is specifically related to the property, ,and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. 3. That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the shoreline environment designation. 4. That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. 5. That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. 6. That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not be adversely affected by the granting of the variance. STATE OF LUASH I NGTON ) s sCITYOFRENTON I, om' s r s as being duly sworn, certify that I am the above-named applicant for a per it to construct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 19.71, and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature t L Subscribed and sworn to me this day of LGW4q4 L Notary Public in and for he State of Washington, residing at 61.e.415th.,) Foxm 177 c 64& i, e} - e f A.,e24 11 .3w_z_ a&-eaolle/ Oece a 61e(Zei / Ahi-e,(x3 071) .ZO-e, 71,/ - , , j.L C) , /\ P' 7747 770( 7 -- Q7,- 97777r" 7cy, 774?- 0(. 7-- 7- e- zo- vt ry- Awp c- f-d- odo‹ July 11, 1977 Order No. 426238 DESCRIPTION: That portion of Lots 79, 80, 81, and 82 in Block "A" of Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 1, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, on page 63, records of King County, Washington, and of the shorelands adjacent thereto as determined by decree entered in King County Superior Court Cause No. 156371, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Government Meander line with the South line of said Lot 81; thence North 51°21' 04" East, 32 feet, more or less, to the Westerly margin of the Northern Pacific Railroad right-of-way; thence Northwesterly along said margin 69 feet to the most Easterly corner__of_a__tract._ conveyed .to Frank Tonkin Wand wife, -Sybil, by -deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 4343188; thence South 65°50' 45" West, 20 feet; thence South 50°55' 04" West, 36. 07 feet to a point on the Meander line; thence South 50°55 ' 04" West 47 feet; thence South 63°38 '.40" West, 222. 51 feet to the Inner-Harbor line; thence South 40°35 ' 00" East, 65. 07 feet; thence North 62°15 ' 42" East 224. 02 feet; thence South 46°34 ' 00" East 10. 82 feet; thence North 50°36 ' 04" East, 50. 70 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT portion thereof lying within Mountain View Avenue. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. n.bJ SP) l 2 Cbecked_: ' Due Plat 1-.. /I PG. ([TJ Order No.// J L 6'Z 3F SKETCH OF PROPERTY SE OUT IN ATTACHED ORDER To assist in Iocating the premises. It i not based on a survey, and the company assumes no Iiability for variations if any, in dimensions and Iocation. 1 lc - -A 3 tl- '''- - ! . 9 : i1tt\,.. - c 1. - t 5 \\ 1 Z I C. O. " 7 A-.'L 50 - S1 C S. E. 95TH ST 2 0..::::. y'?- C., , [ 5r-cl I -C--:.. 0 4 -5/7. - \IA. 4-`) '- s\ z., - s°=` Oc Lam- " 2 v t•a SSr+ i A 8 ,, i.h e'0 J i1p,Eez • i \ ,14 i- V Z\. \ -.\ b LL A — 2 3 -5 E. 6;:SG ZS Irr, •t A 11 C.:) 6 . I? AUTO . WOOD STOVE CON CRETE WALL 0 62 WA I.K FUlt AC t' porrioN -"".."-'-'-'-'a ENTRY . [ I Up J 0 VNI‘TER OF:ATER. 6----- 3 FOOT M['CHAN I CAL K IT 1. FOOT ST R.U Cl-t.)RA L WALL i 0) . I3AT 14 5E1.)koorsA FO R- .:ri CO l'A D 5-TOY V P 261 TO TA I.., FORMAL TA N/11 1- LIVNG ROOMI l.5 MUM a! 0 i--- i • — s„......._ 0 ON STOP Y tvaovE 1 H 01 TUB 0 I I I I I s------------------ - 7.1) A1)1.3 I TiONIS owl."... 7,- ._ .,,s __ __1_- _,,_ 77_,_ . Thrs, In IQ_. ________. ADDITIONS 4lardced-Date Phi: '.- 11 ,PG. V Order No.4 2 v4 SKETCH OF PROPERTY SE OUT IN ATTACHED ORDER To assist in locating the premises. III not based on a survey, and the company assumes no Iiability for variations if any, in dimensions and location. id. i I '71 - 0 Z . C." T, 1 _ r o T 5r LJ 11 M. 13 14 11‹.\'Y 4 \ 1 e ‘ . . " _ • -„,.. !, ::, ii. r \S. E. 95TH Li t". cs att - ` i."' a ZQZ 50 Y O J1110b.V.. 1.5 I. ;Iv 4, i ..;_ .2K 17' Z\os 11-\.- t., O` I. 1• Si S . .. .. . . . --‘10,:,.. .-arl'jr5••• • • - • : ..... t.......„." 0„c•. ---‘ r:. jr›-- ..,.... .... l..... -1`Szsl'-,,,. tr.-. ei,vt, iii 11--- f1 ° 4 j V D v l 51 - .-1,..## Z:\ \\;:i\\"°,e._. T 35- =Lt 0 v • 0 L O ', S g gd: •f 1:--- • a 4:4:6\ . r L 2_ 6 2 3 -5 E G3$bGsZS -cit., tHerton sir. ' 01ezar Lit aisthe6 eor,Ozefep 1,./-z,_2 6 a t/i/zo l4 " ryi& a),e1/4_ 2 saezziziaez) de&iaez.) e e/ze) dae) vas 4 Dw Ata t 6 1 1 11 1 CZi k2. \ \% , li I 1 1N 10ilI 11 1 • III,' 11 l ! pi s ti-\! 1 f ti 311:4*-2.--.-- . -.; . - c..- 6. \i‘it\L I. te-q Ir.; si•,',/,..L V',,./../e;=,,ke 1 I? ,}1J-Tc; woof STOVE CONCRETE \AAA Lt.. ii k." ALNA' i< N..'\ :•,,,, EN-ry rc r A tDDITIory 4 C—Y-- 7 . y uvi. I I .... .] 0 vy.:-.1..ER Of:Al-11k , •--- 3 F 0 0-1* mccil,4!)1 ci.,.l.. • R IT If - --_- -._------I FOOTI . STRUCVAL \A/A L L 1 . .=..-f-____ . E,,,Lvf.I-1 1.-..:1•Ell) RoOM Fc.DP. u P i 1 FORMAL 17-7-.iv)1 L Y LLI kr.) • LIVING DINING ROOM 0 I --zi,,.---• r- ---- ------oNF :-...---Tols,,y Hon- -,,F, CD,0.. u 3, ADL-:..,1 T ION15 It , i r-- --'--- -- /~--` ,~-`` /-