Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA83-081 (2)BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
MCR0tYIED
l
1 3124.Ir 0064 Ott.
IYO A-i ria.16 Illy.40-Oratlr.
i Iy.17 ltnt flew n..
S $ly.17 L....flow.Ir
Ili .,y.11 Illy.Ilu..tlw
r — a Uy.,. nw nr LIy.a.tr,rl
cr.,u o .11r.ur.(tut U.trtr)
s+v a> urwn n :s Illy.Is.u ril I«uwt
10 .Iy.1) Mill Yntrt
1, Illy.It.U.Y,p re rlr
4 of F W[`
a -
a1dUr,u.rI.ITE
BLIONL 19 --
s .d INDEX
iii
1 9( IL-4."
Y I( „..
111
mil _- _ -. 1. _ L. .1-1N.t' ...
If
tanrsna il
1 lr VAI jai
M
r
ASE iA
Iii
Itutunc is $ -I BMW 17 I4 c '••••1
ri
r st 0
le
mom - ---- I
i-
VICINITY MAP 7 2
v•v I
1 '- v-. .-
ttru
o
I
v +"--
t! I
1iIrI
1 I
POWELL AVE. S.W. --- -
y
9 f ' F --1 —15-- -1-
SITE PLAN 1'1'r 5 GENERAL NOTES 13 A-1
z TF-E
0 MAEHLI1vI
Z GROUP
1. ' c_,,,.Ip 4
ARCHITECT"
Z
1
a
9 0 4
i-,,..----7-T lari-cf , Me _,______ lerg_ • Me* 1 ad-e ri-, i .
04
I \
risen •
14/
r
7W
i
00
1
r*ef mf-ef
ri.4 t.ir__.._.__,_rf___rt._..._._____....,r_
e,
fftLr„ .. , 01 l'\•
i
i§
a
0i _,--,,,,, Tr
s
0"-—
b•
i:e+-:—.
A
0 7-
0 1 I 1 1 11 IP 1 I 1 ,q1 • 1- , , , , , ,. .,•-••-•- f1 • I•
1 11 i ;
114-
11 ! ; 1 I- ; ; •: . I111 .101 ; ; ; IHI ; •, : I
a•-,.
t, ---- . 1
FLOOR PLANT BLDG. 16 A-2
04.9ico
TFf_0 0
17.7>./
CD -J"‹ MAEHLUMi--, -....-
r---Io GEW1-4C... X)
PPn =.7....7.,fin
ARCHITECTSz4-; —• ,...:-..--c J-1
0 ,.-.....
a 0
z
0 (...)
fv,
1
A ---
a
l
leIb1W fI •
MO IwrKW+i.y
TENANT NAME
lIII 11 IIH.IiIuIIIIiuiIII I 1u till1III1
EAST
TWA,.come TILT LP -mil
1
yiijLLli 1: [ _
i o1i t
SOUTH NORTH
I
WEST „ BLDG. 16 A-3
ELEVATIONS
LA
U..: U THEz `_;-,ice
R.
r <if°
I
I . .41.. ; MAEHLUM
GROUP
z _.0v ao ARCHITECTS
n a)Z SECTION A-A
to w G:r-1
1 E.....j"
I•
c c›. .
TT1 RT _ _._T-----
11
I
it
II
I iI
I II
1 u_, k__
n r,
1 71'IN r
FIRST FLOOR PLAN BLDG. 17 A-4
7:17rA
n TI-Er7
O L
T._ 0 MAAEE I-LUM
t•, ., .
r 7-, GI LJLJ
fP G.-:7m
u3 C p
ARCHITECTS
n3
rl
71 p
inCMLi
HI
L1Q
Z.QJcea.
1.._- ..— ,_ _..— .. _
a
QzOUwN
II
Ell
112—
ill
iI
a
liIII
I1!
II
cz.]__
1
I
4
II ,
mi.•
Tvid -
iI
c
1III
I
1
II
p
1,
I
6
I
II
II
E
1.
I,
11
it
p
11
I
J
II
II
II
11
II
I
II
ci
II
II
II
II
p
I
I
11
I
i
I
i
E
1minnow1HummingIIIIIII
1
illlllll
t
CITY
OF
RENTON
1.
1
t
R'
P
M
J
y ,
I
Ill
NOV
14
19E3
i
i ,
1 I
WEST v.. 1
v--
iTiTiii 1 I
l ! Hh1
SOUTHI,,, 5 NORTH 2
it
ti
i r f
111 II J
1 %rt/
EAST v.• 3 'BLDG. 17 A-6
MI..PM ,,,-y,
ELEVATIONS
r
7. 1
I I 1 ina.T-,..,Cal..OrMs•J Naze. 11.•,MOW'
F u
THE
11.
o
U
iT MAE jLMx:o IGROP
Z I __4-'-- ARCHITECTS
a. 0)
r=3Z SECTION A—A vs. 4
71 C
a
333 I TENANT NAME
1i III
EAST
7----f DOW-UAL.•WM.-T.=A18c .w.
mawro.wu.'...Ai.w.crnr
I 1 1
1
Lii i
r
NORTH 1.-
7 1n
zo c
c
CO
a
LO
Z
WEST „a• BLDG. 18 A-8
Fr TI-f11_
M
1 MAEH_UM
nm c r.nesgn m—
f—---
N L i r
4
p
ARCHITECTS
SECTION A-A 118. SOUTH
r\ C
Q
jir
0-t
MI
0--- ‘.4 0 i-
t
O
y\.
i
i
M
o
i
Q
Plod
CITY Or REgNTON
ili• NOV 14 i3o3
r Z
as.
I
TT7 I
i 1 i.
H,././to rd
NIP '
AL Tr7"11 . 11 . i : i ' . : i111Hil ! klY I
ti. ri-
1 I—
L i ; 1 1 la '4Ii' 1
L, lik, _ _ 0,wile
t...._._.
4
e....... 14(.........ma)
i
a. I M1 iLi
LAl
Mal"(".......-i) 1 \1 (
D Jul1
1? r 1
per\ {
1 { ~ I
11' i.;a.' l
a ems: if •a s 't . _ 'F.:-
7:. i.Rz.,,: ,r....
1
r.- ." rl • Iaa -5 I.
SITE PLAN SCALE 1"1 A LA-1
GENERAL NOTES PLANT LIST
9 o ep all oysm r ae Y. 15 Ywas mew.Haan. ...ow 1 Y4•.a•W, l
A.nia tallKN 15 .a1MW alafNulfa ni,--ni-i W J Ya•-t"rx.
rflltt}R W Omlltf
IC.LLi QIM'm a •jrizv Z ar vLaDT.maws. Ma 1Qt Rl o1.L1M'i nrodect l au. N•e.
N}q w Se1Mta Ra. yI E Y
1•
Ay ma. N._...UM .ott.n ..a Js.,_a.t. .THEw"LX as naf ..7...,....: 6.. O -4 .c
j0 M
Pf m
ARCHITECTS
CO r. 44
OF R4,
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTU4$
rLl
RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTORZo
O 'MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-25409,
0 0.
A09ltEoSEP1
OP
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 14, 1986
TO: Files (All Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) and First City Equity Files)
FROM:
C o er J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT.. DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 'B' OF SPRINGBROOK TECHNICAL CENTER
The ERC conditions at the time of plat approval required the dedication and construction
of Oakesdale Avenue (2 lanes) along the west side of Tract 'B' from S.W. Seventh Street
to S.W. Grady Way prior to the development of Tract 'B'. Development of the parcels
adjacent to Tract 'B' by First City Equities and Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) have
been short of parking spaces on existing lots. In order to accommodate proposed parking,
lot line adjustments have been approved in which a portion of Tract 'B' is added to the
adjacent lots. These lot line adjustments for parking lot areas raised the question of
whether Oakesdale needed to be constructed.
On October 30. 1985, the ERC upon review of a new traffic analysis determined that "...
parking lots can be constructed on Parcel B without the implementation of the condition
to construct Oakesdale Avenue. This interpretation does not include the construction of
any buildings." HOW I(i c Q kjE k fi'r1
RJB:JSM:ss PP. ``-3( ' ) FLU j 9)I-?5:,
2156Z SA 41--35 '' FP Ico•l I I,
S(-1 et)G-2s3l-I h
i0t.`z I H )
Au,
3A•SI
sh D l g N Uh
3 ULM H
Sn ig.
Llt u5. 5 \1jii
3P-12‘1.9)
C'^Or"REN700 I
JAN MAffidavitofPublication61984
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT,
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING Ss.
udrey DeJoie zF'
Mg mzm i
being first duly sworn on w m
OwC07p__1wz
1
she cnief clerk z wZ2oro
oath,deposes and says that is the of Ir m c
O z c)
r >mr=mTHEDAILYRECORDCHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a jz o=_ z
week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been 0 m m-c m m OT
for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, 0 z c z I
printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper iC Z 0 m cn
m
0 I
published four(4)times a week-in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is
un m Co z 11
now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the
aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record f 8 _ _.i_ O o m'Z s•
Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior o 3 3 v
n
O O N $>
m
o m
m
lrt
Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County,g H m o -
v m cAn r z m O y
go o m`5ENz1z<•• -nDzOxDOmpONoticeofPublico o- Oc? z
m c)
Washington.That the annexed is a
i a o w v O -- 0 0 OT 21
Emanm * Q =z
n *ApNC m
earin R8876w o w m m Z = ,i=C-
m3 1. a m mc m wto nnmm
m o my Z G) m- -1 O
cm`n . m>O z z>
as it was published in regular issues(and 5' m v m--t z F o T O-1
not in supplement form of said newspaper)once each issue for a period z y ma 3 r cfosma • 0w .o
of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the S' a. m a 2 n<a-8 a y f.
g m
S =. oOct 3
my go3ii:t1 dayof i eCaTilvar 19 63 ,and ending the j c ? i g'' a
7 i
7
c a
30th December 3 m
dayof 19 both dates m =m kg gc m zi of csg>vinclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-CD
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee 72 $g C 'm n c)m m m-•pc
4•20 poat amwv r)a-l ocmi >
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ which
Li.3 3 w$ti m g,- • 6 al t t r y r¢-m
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the I- o c
o
c,_ in m o _.
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent w
a
g .4 n y v m c $o R
insertion. I3 3 + _b r n <i o S2 g
z$' xp?
o
m $ c 76 rn
G m.R v(C s. z
o.2 g c. N Co
t mg° mma 3 v m amo
e g g-g EZ m a cc 2--o m
a 0 a' -3 m m
Cnie Clerk 77a2N1E.Q o..•??43+ Tam
O W w ma arm o 3 - <O -a
rd. PaTa `r ri>>_^s0172 °) ,
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
3
dayof 33 0 m m
m m$ `D oo ud 03 ,..v 3
January 81
m,'; 33m m gm$a*ncm0
19
m. Ng30
m
H = m mmb
p
g -E O 4,
00 •G), aj2Iv< sm F. g. .mm
0e52z- S. wa 0
Notary Public in and for the Si f Washington, r cc
resit j i County. 9 9'o U 6 'ca E 2 3 g
Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June
9th, 1955.
Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by the newspapers of the State.y
VN e87 Revised 5/82
OF R4,4,
4 4y © ° THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
Z
p BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9,0 o-
o P FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -25939
FD SEPTE
O
February 2, 1984
Mr. Larry Davis
Holvick, deRegt, Koering
725 Powell Avenue S.W.
Renton, WA 98055
RE: File No.:SA-081-83
Holvick, deRegt, Koering
Dear Mr. Davis:
The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on
January 12, 1984 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by
ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City
Clerk this date for filing.
Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required.
Sincerely,
Fred J. Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
cc: City Clerk
Building & Zoning Department
0422E
4,
SA- og,l;- 83
S-00114110044
HOLVICK deREGT KOERING
November 23, 1983
it
NOV 2 8 1983,Mr. Roger Blaylock I,
Planning Office
CITY OF RENTON
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055 III
RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING #16-19
Dear Mr. Blaylock:
Holvick deRegt Koering has asked the Transpo Group to review and
comment on our alternative use proposals for Washington Technical
Center. They have prepared a comparison of the changes in daily and
p.m. peak hour trip generation between the final environmental impact
statement statistics of building mix to a proposed mixed use of 75%
office and 25% manufacturing. The review and comparison is enclosed
in the following Transpo Group report.
The results of the Transpo Group review indicates that although we are
increasingthe office use over the projected office use in the environ-
mental impact statement, we are reducing overall trips generated from
the site. This reduction is due to the seventeen acres being lost to
the City of Renton for the P-1 channel and the reduction of the heavy
truck traffic trip generation that was associated with heavy and light
warehousing.
This report should answer any questions the City has regarding their
concern of trips generated from the site and how it may affect the
original impacts outlined in the environmental impact statement. If
you have any questions, please contact myself or Mr. Dave Markley at
The Transpo Group at your earliest convenience. We look forward to
hearing from you on when we will be scheduled before the Hearing Ex-
aminer on our site plan approval for the above referenced buildings.
Very truly yours,
HOLVICK deREGT KOERING
C 13I
Loren Davis
LD/gb
725 POWELL AVENUE S.W., SUITE A, RENTON, WA 98055 TELEPHONE (206) 226-1222
co py
The
Transportation Engineering & Planning Consultants TRANSPO
Grove
Cityr(
MOrg&IGM
f` i `, •
t
ypCtq^
November 22, 1983
Mr. Loren Davis NOV. 2HolvickdeRegtKoering 1983'
725 Powell Avenue SW
Suite A
Renton, WA 98055
SUBJECT: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
Dear Mr. Davis:
Thank you for asking The TRANSPO Group to review and comment on alterna-
tive site plan proposals for the Washington Technical Center. As
requested, we have prepared a comparison of the changes in daily and PM
peak hour trip generation, the generation of heavy truck traffic, and a
general estimate of the effect of these traffic volumes on the street
network.
Development Options
The base condition used for comparison is the development proposal
outlined in the February 1981 FEIS for the Earlington Park project. The
Earlington Park proposal covered 109.31 acres with a building area of1,980,880 square feet. As depicted in Table 1 this proposal contains a
mix of warehouse, business park and office uses.
The first development option (Option#1) covers 81.28 acres and accounts
for a total building area of 1,416,230 square feet. The reduction in
building acreage is the result of 17 acres that were set aside for a
retention pond for roads that were not accounted for in the initial
EIS. The uses under Option #1 are confined to business park and office
uses only.
Under Option #2, the 81.28 acres is divided into two parcels in accor-
dance with ownership of the property including 28.17 acres under the
control of Holvick deRegt Koering (HdK) , and 53.11 acres under the
control of First City Equities. Under development Option #2, the HdK
properties would be developed with business park and office uses only,
while the First City Equities properties would maintain a mix of land
uses that are proposed to be in approximate proportion to the mix of
land uses found in the original Earlington Park proposal .
The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 23-148th Avenue SE, Bellevue, Washington 98007 • (206) 641-3881
II,
The
TRANS1
Mr. Loren Davis Grov('
November 22, 1983
Page 2
Summary
In summary, this analysis finds that the daily trip generation
associated with development Options #1 or #2 would decrease by 9 and
11.5 percent, respectively, as compared with the original Earlington
Park proposal . The evening peak hour traffic volumes will decrease from
2660 vehicles per hour (vph) by 430 to 470 vph or a 16 to 18 percent
decrease as compared with the Earlington Park proposal .
Of greater significance is the reduction in the heavy truck volumes that
relate to the elimination of heavy warehousing. On a daily basis, heavy
truck volumes are anticipated to reduce by 15 to 60 percent. During the
peak hour, volumes are estimated to stay the same or be reduced by as
much as 40 percent as compared with the Earlington Park proposal .
A part of the Washington Technical Center Revised Site Plan, is a
connection from the site to Monster Road. As noted in our previous
report of September 14, 1982, this is expected to reduce volumes by as
much as 15 to 25 percent of the daily and peak hour traffic volumes. As
part of the development of the first phase of devlopment two traffic
signals were installed. These improvements served to mitigate first and
second phase impacts.
The Monster Road Connection, the reduction in traffic volumes, the lower
number of heavy trucks, and the recent traffic control improvements
combine such that there will be a noticeable reduction in the level of
impact that is expected to occur due to development of either of these
options as compared with the impacts outlined in the FEIS for the
original Earlington Park project.
Trip Generation
I`
A comparison of daily and PM peak hour trip generation was made using
trip generation rates found in the traffic analysis for the Earlington
Park project so the results could be directly compared. The results of
this analysis are depicted on Table 1 and show that the daily trip
generation associated with Options #1 and #2 are estimated to be 18,060
and 17,750 vehicles per day (vpd) , respectively. This is to be compared
with the daily trip generation associated with the original Earlington
Park proposal which was forecasted to generate 19,820 vpd.
The evening peak hour traffic volumes will also decrease from the 2,660
vph level associated with the Earlington Park proposal to 2,230 and
2,190 vph for development Options #1 and #2, respectively. This
The
Mr. Loren Davis TRANSINovember22, 1983
Page 3 wow
reduction is due to several factors. Primary among them is the reduc-
tion of the total building land area from 109.31 acres to 81.28 acres.
This has resulted in a reduction in the total building area from
1,980,880 square feet to 1,416,230 square feet and 1,387,260 square feet
for development Options #1 and #2, respectively. Further, the proposed
site coverage was reduced. These factors offset the increased propor-
tion of more intensive uses like business park and office.
Truck Traffic
As indicated above, the percentage of trucks in the traffic stream is
expected to reduce sharply as a result of the decrease in heavy ware-
housing activity. Under the Earlington Park proposal , between 2,710 and
6,070 trucks per day were estimated to be generated. Under Option #1,
this truck volume reduces to between 1,060 and 5,365 trucks per day, and
Under Option #2, the reduction is from 1,575 to 5,145 trucks per day.
See Table 2. During the PM peak hour, the Earlington Park proposal
would generate between 65 and 170 trucks per hour, while development
Option #1 would generated between 70 and 145 trucks per hour. Option #2
contains some light warehousing, and the reduction is therefore somewhat
less than Option #1 and ranges between 40 and 150 trucks per hour. On a
daily basis, truck traffic could reduce between 15 to 60 percent, while
during the evening peak hour volumes could reduce as much as 38 percent.
The significant aspect of these reductions is that the traffic impact of
each heavy truck is equivalent to between 2 and 4 passenger vehicles.
This is because the heavier trucks move more slowly and have operating
characteristics that are less responsive than passenger vehicles. Thus,
while the actual reduction in heavy truck trips may be 700 to 1,700
trucks per day, it may have an impact equivalent to a reduction of 1,400
to 6,000 passenger vehicle trips.
Based on the review of trip generation characteristics outlined above in
combination with the improvements that are proposed as well as improve-
ments that have already been made to intersection design and signaliza-
tion, this analysis indicates that development under Option #1 or Option
2 would have traffic impacts that would be noticeably less severe than
those outlined in the Environmental Impact Statement for the Earlington
Park development (FEIS, February 1981) . j1
I19
I I
1
The
Mr. Loren Davis T RANISP C
November 22, 1983 CrOVp
Page 4
I trust this letter responds to your questions regarding changes in
traffic impacts that result from redefinition of the development profile
for the Earlington Park/Washington Technical Center project. If you or
the City of Renton have any questions regarding our findings and conclu-
sions, I encourage you to call me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
The TRANSPO Group, Inc.
David D. Markley
Principal
DDM/lf
Attachments
Table 1
LAND DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
Trip Generation Rate Trip Generation
Use Building Land Area Site Building Daily PM Peak Daily PM Peak
Acres Sq.Ft. Coverage Area
Original EIS
Heavy Warehousing 774,490 5 9 3,870 700
Light Warehousing 377,340 6 9 2,270 340
Business Park 338,470 10 1.3 3,380 440
Office 490,580 21 2.4 10,300 1,180
Total 109.31 1,980,880 19,820 2,660
Option #1
Business Park 60.96 2,655,420 40% 1,062,170 10 1.3 10,620 1,380
Office 20.32 885,140 40% 354,060 21 2.4 7,440 850
Total 81.28 3,540,560 40% 1,416,230 18,060 2,230
Option #2
HdK
Business Park 7.04 306,660 40% 122,660 10 1.3 1,230 160
Office 21.13 920,420 40% 368,170 21 2.4 7,730 880
FCE
Light Warehousing 26.55 1,156,520 45% 520,430 6 9 3,120 470
Business Park 13.28 578,480 35%202,460 10 1.3 2,020 260
Office 13.28 578,480 30% 173,540 21 2.4 3,650 420
Total
Light Warehousing 26.55 1,156,520 520,430 6 9 3,120 470
Business Park 20.32 885,140 325,120 10 1.3 3,250 420
Office 34.41 1,498,900 541,710 21 2.4 11,380 1,300
Table 2
TRUCK VOLUME SUMMARY
Heavy Truck Volumes
Use Daily PM Peak He
Original EIS
Heavy Warehousing 1570 - 2750 35 - 7C
Light Warehousing 880 - 1540 15 - 3E
Business Park 260 - 1030 15 - 3E
Office 0 - 750 0 - 3C
Total 2710 - 6070 65 - 17(
Option #1
Business Park 1060 - 4250 70 - 14C
Office 0 - 1115 0 - E
Total 1060 - 5365 70 - 14E
Option #2
HdK
Business Park 125 - 490 10 - lE
Office 0 - 1115 0 - 4E
FCE
Light Warehousing 1250 - 2185 20 - 4E
Business Park 200 - 810 10 - 2E
Office 0 - 545 0 - 2C
Total
Light Warehousing 1250 - 2185 20 - 4E
Business Park 325 - 1300 20 - 4(
Office 0 - 1660 0 - 6E
Total 1575 - 5145 40 - 15(
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
County of King
SUE E L L I S TO N being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes
and states:
That on the 12th day of January 19 83 , affiant deposited in the
mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation
with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application
or petition.
Subscribed and sworn to me this 12thday of January 1983.
Not : Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Renton
therein.
Ili
11
Application, Petition or Case : HOLV I C K, deREGT, KOER I NG : SA-081-83
The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.)
January 12, 1984
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION.
APPLICANT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
FILE NO. SA-081- 83
LOCATION: Approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site approval to allow construction of
three (3) one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one (1)
two-story tilt-up concrete building with a total of 66,000
square feet.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation:
Approval.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval, subject to
conditions.
BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was
DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on January 3, 1984.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department
Report, examining available information on file with the
application, and field checking the property and
surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing
on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on January 10, 1984, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
The following were entered into the record by the Examiner:
Exhibit #1: Yellow file containing the application, staff
report, and other pertinent documents
pertaining to posting and publication.
Exhibit #2: Site Plan which also shows some schematic
landscaping.
The staff report was presented by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. He stated the
applicant is requesting a site plan approval to allow development of the next + 4.3 acres of
building area in Phase 1 of Washington Technical Center. The site plan proposed is for 66,000
square feet of building in one-story, tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story, tilt-up
building; that this phase is located immediately south of the present buildings which have been
approved under site plan approvals SA-094-81 and SA-065-83.
Mr. Blaylock further stated the applicant has provided the city with the proper utility
easements for the site, and that the surrounding area is developing into a business park setting
also. He also noted it is difficult to estimate the number of trips per day this will generate, but
it has been estimated at between 263 average trips as proposed, to 1,146 average trips if the
site were developed based on maximum parking for office use
HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
SA-081-83
JANUARY 12, 1984
Page 2
It was pointed out that the site plan complies with the modified approved plat for Washington
Technical Center; that this plat was modified under boundary line adjust (LLA-016- 83) to move
the lot line to increase the size of Lot #3 on which the project is proposed to be developed; that
the utility easements are in the process of being modified and the site plan approval should be
granted subject to vacation of utility easements by the City Council.
Mr. Blaylock stated the staff recommends approval of the request, subject to the release of
utility easements by the City Council.
The Examiner called on the applicant or representative. Responding was:
Loren Davis
Holvick, deRegt, Koering
725 Powell Avenue S.W.
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Davis indicated the applicant concurs with the staff report for this phase and they are
keeping with the same atmosphere of the previous buildings; that they are seeing a good
response to their endeavors in this area. Further, he stated it is the applicant's intention to
landscape the next set of buildings similar to the ones already completed, and that they hope
the utility easement will come before the Council shortly.
The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. There was none. The
Examiner then called for testimony in opposition to the application. There was none.
The Examiner closed the hearing at 9:20 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the
Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, Holvick, deRegt, Koering, filed a request for approval of a site plan
for four new buildings in an M- P (Manufacturing Park) Zone.
2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act
SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other
pertinent documents, was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA, a
Declaration of Non--Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the
Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. The subject proposal met with no opposition from the public.
6. The subject site is located near the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W., and is part of
the Washington Technical Center at the site of the old Earlington Golf Course.
7. The site is level and covered with grasses and small shrubs.
8. The applicant proposes erecting four additional buildings as part of its phased
development of the Technical Center. Buildings have already been erected north
and northeast of the subject site.
9. The buildings will be tilt-up concrete buildings. Three of the structures will be one
story (Buildings 16, 18 and 19), while one of the buildings (Building 17) will be a
two-story building.
The design will be consistent with the existing building in the complex.
HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
SA-081-83
JANUARY 12, 1984
Page 3
10. While the landscaping plans submitted with the application are not consistent with
those already in place in the complex, the applicant has expressed willingness to
install similar landscaping.
11. The buildings will contain approximately 66,000 sq. ft. of interior floor space.
Parking will be provided for 266 vehicles. The parking space limits the mix of
office and warehousing which may be contained within the buildings. A ratio of
50,000 sq. ft. of office and 16,000 sq. ft. of warehousing could be achieved under
the parking constraints.
12. The applicant will have to meet the requirements of the Fire Department for
access to all areas of the subject site.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposed site plan appears to serve the public use and interest subject to a
modification of the landscaping plans to tie in with the existing landscaping of the
already constructed portion of the complex, and further subject to the approval of
the city's landscape architect.
2. The applicant is limited to a certain mix of uses under the underlying
environmental decisions regarding traffic impacts and is similarly governed in this
respect by the parking requirements for office versus warehousing.
The proposed 266 parking spaces would allow 50,000 sq. ft. of office space and
16,000 sq. ft. of warehousing. The Building and Zoning Department intends to
monitor the mix of uses as development of the site proceeds and as a tenant mix is
arrived at by the applicant.
3. Development will expand the opportunities and variety of options available for
light industrial and office users and thereby broaden the economic base of the
city. New employment opportunities should also be created by the additions to the
Technical Center.
DECISION:
The site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1) modification of the
landscaping plan to assure uniformity of design with existing development in the complex
and subject to approval of the city's landscape architect; and 2) vacation by the City
Council of the utility easements underlying the center of the subject site.
ORDERED THIS 12th day of January, 1984.
Fred J. Kaufman
Land Use Hearing., xaminer
TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of January, 1984 to the parties of record:
Larry Davis
Holvick, deRegt, Koering
725 Powell Avenue S.W.
Renton, WA 98055
HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
SA-081-83
JANUARY 12, 1984
Page 4
TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of January, 1984 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
David Clemens, Policy Development Director
Members, Renton Planning Commission
Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed
in writing on or before January 26, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the
Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the
discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may
make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of
the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such
appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems
proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such
appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other
specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the
Finance Department, first floor of City Hall.
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one)
communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use
decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal.
Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the
City Council.
All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all
interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly
rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the
request by the Court.
The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for
Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council.
1. t !4
4- ,,fi! , 11 - z- •< ' ' ' 'JJlGH' f. 1. S 3r
I V
A
e
0... c kli II-':.' 4/::-777
i
t ...
7-+•`-
e
j
t
7-4 -
j';
air q• D t .
I
f=•- Cv- t '
N\\\ wry /
I ' . '
f 7 k : ." /• -.• &i•,',Iii• /74;
l7
r
lik.... . .,
jaL, _''I •• . C 0
iJ
I :
R-2 y .
t as• /
it
ABANOONEO , \ \ 17. R-1
3tT1. I
4-
1") iltr
sw. -
I N 1‘
44k4,\\f- L. ,I
1 r ...
e.- - •
1 .i I
4 0
M E T R
W
1 1
21- . IL
D I S P O S A I L I L_ O.c .4.;4a
yI
14
I I 1111 .1
Frila4'''i t
i Ttnilli,
1
S( in11I14,. ' <, yiI
1...1 \
8. 1 1flo,...„_.,:. .....___.____........,,.......:____r,____________
Ligokill , _ . :I
Tifl 0 IliLilt.,'.' : I." i
A ..
1 !, /,..„....,
Aistipidds ii-reig; 011.111±
414 0_.: =7-2=ilyE0 -: t Li.....4.:
1„, _.,:P AliAk .....1.00000,010.1,-'"---prillillAillPk
HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
SA-081-83
APPLICANT HOVICK, deREGT, KOERING TOTAL AREA - 4.3 ACRES
I
I'
PRINCIPAL ACCESS POWELL AVENUE S.W.
EXISTING ZONING M-P,' MANUFACTURING PARK
EXISTING USE VACANT
PROPOSED USE 3 ONE-STORY BUILDINGS AND 1 TWO-STORY BUILDING FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE
USEli
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK
COMMENTS Ii
I
CITY OF RENTON
LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 10, 1984
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.:
COUNCIL CHAMBRS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the
order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the
Hearing Examiner.
HOLVICI , deREGT, KOERING
WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A)
Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up
concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square
feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business par:; and light warehousing, file
SA-081-83; property located at approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W.
GEORGE SMITH SHORT PLAT
Application to short plat 1.88 acres of property into three (3) lots. One lot of the short
plat will be used for an automated car wash with the remaining lots left undeveloped, file
SH. PL. -084-83; property located at the southeast corner of N.E. 4th Street and Union
Avenue N.E.
MAMIE SWALES (ECF-054-83)
Application to rezone 1.3 acres of property from R-1 to L-1 for future light industrial
development, file R-062-83; property located at 1307 Maple Avenue S.W. and 325 S.W.
13th Street.
CASCADE PACIFIC DEV. CORP./SEA-VAN PROPERTIES (ECF-068-83)
Application for preliminary prat, file PP-074-83, and PUD approval to redesign and replat
Cedar Ridge residential park of + 30.7 acres from a multi-family attached environment to
a neighborhood of single family detached homes totaling 138 units, file PPUD-075-83;
property located at 1800 Lake Youngs Way S.E.
0496Z
BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 10, 1984
APPLICANT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
FILE NUMBER: SA-081-83
A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant seeks site approval to allow construction of three (3) one-story
tilt-up concrete buildings and one (1) two-story tilt-up concrete building with a
total of 66,000 square feet.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record: Holvick, deRegt, Koering 11['
2. Applicant: Holvick, deRegt, Koering
3. Location:
Vicinity Map Attached) Approximately the 800 block of
Powell Avenue S.W.
4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Building & Zoning Department.
II I
5. Size of Property: 4.3 acres
6. Access: Powell Avenue S.W.
7. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park
8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; I -1, Light
Industry; and M-P, Manufacturing
Park
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan:Manufacturing Park
10. Notification: The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date. Notice
was properly published in the Daily
Record Chronicle on December 30,
1983, and posted in three places on
or near the site as required by City
Ordinance on December 30, 1983.
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1745 of April 14, 1959,
and rezoned from G, General Use, to M-P, Manufacturing Park by Ordinance #3344
of August 17, 1979. A site plan for the subject site was submitted in 1981
SA-101-81), but never reviewed by the Hearing Examiner.
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1. Topography: The subject site is relatively flat.
2. Soils: Woodinville Silt Loam (Wo), slopes are less than 2%. Permeability is
moderately slow. The available water capacity is high. Runoff is slow, and
the hazard of erosion is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard unless
flood protection is provided. This soil is used for row crops, pasture and
urban development.
PRELIMINARY REPOR1 10 THE HEARING EXAMINER
HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING: SA-081-83
JANUARY 10, 1984
PAGE 2
3. Vegetation: The subject site is covered by grasses, heather, and scrub trees.
4. Wildlife: The vegetation on the subject property is sufficient to provide
suitable habitat for birds and small mammals.
5. Water: Ponding on areas of the site was observed on December 14, 1983,
during a field study to the site.
6. Land Use: The subject site is presently undeveloped.
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
Development in the area surrounding the subject property consists of office and
warehouse uses to the north; warehousing and an industrial park to the east; and
undeveloped property to the south and west.
F. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities:
a. Water - A twelve-inch water main extends east--west on S.W. 7th
Street and north-south on Powell Avenue S.W.
b. Sewer - A ten-inch sanitary sewer is located on Powell Avenue S.W.
c. Storm Water Drainage. •- The subject site drains into Springbrook creek.
No on-site storm water retention is required. No compensating flood
storage is required.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance
requirements.
3.Transit: METRO Transit Route #912 operates along S.W. Grady Way
approximately 800 feet south of the subject site.
4. Schools: Not applicable.
5. Recreation: Not applicable.
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1. Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturing Park District.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL
CITY DOCUMENT:
1. Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan
Compendium, p. 31-35.
2. Policies Element, City of Renton Comrprhensive Plan Compendium,
Industrial Goals and Objectibes, p. 18-19.
IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1. Natural Systems: Construction on the site will remove the vegetation.
disturb the soils, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic
and noise levels in the vicinity. Proper development controls and procedures
can mitigate the identified impacts of site development.
2. Population/Employment: Minor. More information is necessary to determine
the actual impact of the utilization of the site for business park warehouse
uses on employment in the Renton area.
3. Schools: Not applicable.
4. Social: Minor.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING: SA-081-83
JANUARY 10, 1984
PAGE 3
5. Traffic: The traffic impact of the proposed project is difficult to determine
without any indication as to precentage of business park use versus warehouse
use. The project as proposed is expected to generate 263 average daily trips
Traffic Engineering estimate). However, if the site were developed for
office use based on maximum parking (worst case), then 1,146 average daily
trips would be generated (based on 21 ADT per 1,000 square feet).
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordiriaru:e and the State
Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended. RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of
non-significance was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on December
7, 1983.
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department.
2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division.
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.
4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division.
5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau.
6. City of Renton Policy Development Department.
7. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department.
L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS;
1. The applicant, Holvick, deRegt & Koering, is requesting site plan approval to
allow development of the next +4.3 acres of building area in Phase 1 of
Washington Technical Center. The site plan proposed 66,000 square feet of
building in one-story, tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story, tilt-up
building.
The proposal is located immediately south of the present buildings approved
under site plan approvals (SA-094-81 and SA-065-83).
2. The proposal, as submitted, complies with the Comprehensive Plan
designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site and the present M-P,
Manufacturing Park zoning.
3.The specific site plan complies with the modified approved plat for
Washington Technical Center. This plat was modified under boundary line
adjustment (LLA-016-83) to move the lot line to increase the size of Lot #3
on which the project is proposed to be developed. The utility easements are
in the process of being modified and the site plan approval should be granted
subject to vacation of utility easements by the City of Renton City Council.
4. Public services to the site have been provided through the completion of
Phase 1 of the plat. Minor modifications will result with the actual
development of the site. In 1982, a variance was granted to allow joint use
access on the common property lines, File V-014-82. This variance is still
valid. The site plan as presented utilizes a joint use access on the northern
property line only.
5.The parking as shown complies with the dimensional requirements of the
Parking and Loading Ordinance. Based upon the 266 parking spaces provided,
only 50,000 sq. ft. out of the total 66,000 sq. ft. proposed can be utilized for
office space. The remaining 16,000 sq. ft. would be categorized as light
warehousing. As tenant improvements occur in the buildings, the Building
and Zoning Department will keep track of required parking per use.
6. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Declaration of
Non-Significance subject to the provision that access roadways from Phase 1
to the north are to be extended through Phase 2 to a minimum standard for
design required by the Fire Code.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 1 HE HEARING EXAMINER
HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING: SA-081-83
JANUARY 10, 1984
PAGE 4
7. Based upon the maximum number of parking spaces available on site, a
traffic generation estimate was completed using the criteria established in
the draft Environmental Impact Statement to determine if the project was
still within the scope of the original EIS for Phase 1. Average daily trips
ADT) for Phase 1 were estimated in the DEIS to 6,660. Any development
that would exceed that number for Phase 1 would require a supplemental
evaluation of traffic impacts. The following table shows trip generation as
actually developed in Phase 1 at this time and proposed in Phase 1-C
SA-081-83). The total to date would account for 1,848 trips which is well
within the limits established for Phase 1.
TRIP GENERATION
ESTIMATED IN D.E.I.S.
DAILY AND PM PEAK HOUR
Phase Heavy Warehousing Light Warehousing Business Park Office Park Total
Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr
2060 370 2265 340 2335 305 0 0 6600 1015
11 1815 325 0 0 1050 135 5150 590 8015 1050
TOTAL 3875 695 2265 340 3385 440 5150 590 14,675 2065
ACTUAL - Phase One
Phase Heavy Warehousing Light Warehousing Business Park Office Park Total
Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr
Bldg
12 331 38 331 38
Bldg
13 20 2 109 12 129 14
Bldg
14 205 23 205 23
Bldg
3 37 5 37 5
3,677 Occupied)
20 2 37 5 645 73 702 80
PROPOSED - Phase I-C
Phase Heavy Warehousing Light Warehousing Business Park Office Park Total
Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr
Bldg 16 16,000 square feet light warehousing
Bldg 17 50,000 square feet office
Bldg 18
Bldg 19 96 14 1050 120 1146 134
Total to Date 116 16 37 5 1695 193 1848 214
8. Departmental comments have been attached for the Hearing Examiner's and
the public's review.
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the site approval request,
SA-081-83, be approved subject to the release of utility easements by the City
Council.
ri
G~'
4Y
S rr
1{
e 7.1S,
r , vi-f/.. .4'1, NJ -4.;.1,,,,41w
iit ri71-
1 isl'
l
J I
yy_:4.47 ,7'.•
40-0,
0
waft* z:L-st
f U l 1'4,5• fT
4;i3-A —56
4
1 `\` \\ 5 re,
R-1
P`
S
1 i I'I I L.I
I tN
I i 1 M-1 i
M E T R
1 i
i' p-1 1 v 1, ..
IS PO 5 AIL L.-
am, -" D
r 11TSTL_I;;;;_
5;;i t.,,1 II11 r I;i minmill it
I j 111 I (
iil(111u MI N`
fIT '
i U`,
L1
4000001111- 11.------lik .' \ 1 AL-
1 •. ' :• .T1 1 I
moA
1
R
k., .....ae.---- 11110.4
HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
SA-081-83
APPLICANT HOVICK, deREGT, KOERING TOTAL AREA - 4.3 ACRES
PRINCIPAL ACCESS POWELL AVENUE S.W.
EXISTING ZONING M-P,- MANUFACTURING PARK
EXISTING USE VACANT
PROPOSED USE 3 ONE-STORY BUILDINGS AND 1 TWO-STORY BUILDING FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE
USE
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK
COMMENTS
1 •
P.M I.1,14 miaow rata.
jt.sZairrai.=.........
4111111k .Mk .."-ii.c.......r
J.,......7
Mr .1°. .li1P.1'
777-77 7-777-1 • • ' I ' il17. H i • • 11e0iii
1 ___ ____I I ;
I ' 1,1.0114-- diti. i ' - . .i........._,
1,,
I 1
p4.3. 1110
I
g....,....1,..,...----)
4;1
in -1- 1. •i
I 1 / I.
0 --11Z,NI I •,.
1 ._ -- -
e
I
ttilTsai"114rIlan .-
e— 1 ' ,..t=1 '' ..4• I i 1GI
L• I I I Al\AL
9
1111, . i-.-. —...
I
I 1
i i
1......
I1 . ' /— i tiani""...'"') a- • , t
r-r7-1-
1 • \. (3, -• .€7)--
AIL I c--1111f AO• I
1. NOP' I
1 II .'-! ';'. 4 . ' • 1 r
1 1
s,... "Nr;•isi ...4,:e:,.... iit .1)0(....i... 1mei 'I,'-. 1".•'•1 1!,V.i?. '1,....'L 15riall-,7.4::: ••,,4-_--. 1:1,.,.' 21.:f.11.4- ---'-..r-4...,•-r.,..•
11 _•.'),* ..11.01.•••741 _••-- .•7!...Tra', ... •,,a,;'..• oe..t ililinem...no w••.,••,...MIABIO-70.-.•2... '...4_I....T7,.WIIII-44.0.•! ''IV".,'
1
Al.:. s.'t:7 7:•. e- AT., LiVe.-I in.7',. ;;..-•
SITE PLAN I ALA is s 111Q't LA-1
4!..,•••
5,-- .-----1
GENERAL NOTES PLANT LIST Uss
s•ss ,P 1
szfal1 cm. •&•••.=rim or ...l.OM OP ill. 'arm. alma••••mnss• MON= II N.M.. 6.......-,... . ..
0.1.10. IP PM&e•4:eillhot as 'whir, ,Nollau.• alma/MY••• A Ve•-11.01-.=
mMno"‘4"11411A" • r l, NIC.21.1C• 101.01.1M10 I CI, .' .4..
7. 1
n
ina.MIRING Mohll .11:42.7...t MN,1.101.1%.. 1.W!UR. r-410=11 Warw.tau IN 11117•10.3.111 DLL 1,41.10•11 AMU . 7: '::... THE.
0 MAEFEJMr..,. 1-n
i---,
3U—....,
t.,'..-... -ss-••-rn GRc_xy
z
ARCHITECTS
w•
71 F.1
4.1 Stu Il. Nolo.Yu
4I 111 11 flaw rl.
1-1 ll...I. Si\.lt.ut...I` If Iva Plow Pion
i I-. M.II 1st.Mutt..P.
T_ —_ _ 4) P.I.,. IL.r..Illy.II.\.4/
ANSI.Kl.6..VI.NM
N llq.Y II..Il.11wM1.yllll.a. Sl.)
1Pd { ll...1.1 II \11 WOOS
yyyi
l r r
4
I-II Sly.Ir bl1 yal..
an u> 1t Ily.
l.
uuuu .I. . . \ ll.
T...............4Y Mul
tea.!t
116.7...1
le
1
1
ilfi I I
it
11
P d
1 1
f
I 1 .- r.,_ 3 '
1 ILA WING 1• - 1
i I
4 _._.,_
I
i will. 1 j ) I7 1
MOM..Litir •
1s Y re .
1
4_.ate.__ ..,
t •
a...a li,—.r_?°
f
t R i e '
it' ''' . ' . I
ar
g Lp1N fNA3l 3A
f ry
R1.0•lG A 1 lAo•1G 17 c` 1 - Z1
st.e A !!LLLi,.__ f .z tr .
I
r•d l>z. r t'
d
1- E .. I -lit M 1 .,.. 64 mom 1 VICINITY MAP jl"..j 2
y
1
u-
titti{.*AA
11111.11111111. I \
i I Y.._s-I...r,
1 i ij I I
ww...s a w.w-.r.ow..1.1 ,\ WV uwr Y• toll Y In ..,.
it— —
y
POWEII AVE.S.W.
1
7
r_
SITE PLAN'11w 5 GENERAL NOTES 3 A-1
r-
TH.77 E
MAD-TUNA
f
GROUP
er"1O ARCHITECTS
t e:l
c 1 Z I
l
KtV1tW1N6 DEPAKTMENT/DIVISION :
ID APPROVED Al . ..OVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
z7777
II i
I i
DATE :
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO'OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182 •
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : t47L. fry r A/FiAl6-67.0M:5-
El APPROVED r-i APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS SNOT APPROVED
UTILITY APPROVAL Suryth,i i l 1
IAT -COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER Wm
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER 110
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • WATER yEc } Q, G4 AT
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER S .PT.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CURSE - SEWER n/p
YAPPROVEDWATERPLANES 1466
APPROVED SEWER PLAN
APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS
I
BY FIRE DEPT. Y'c
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS
1
l5C'
Ift06
D R T
DATE: / -
SIGNATURE 0
73
I EC OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
KtVItWINU UtrAKIMNI/v1V1JlUIN : tea f f L L -i4 e- t/
OAPPROVED J APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
Ih
i'
r i
6 371 1 ) DATE : /; /S
J /SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
fl APPROVED AI OVED WITH CONDITIONS flNOT APPROVED
11,1/5 7 M e eAt r 410,140
r ,
re7Ui remeitiS r- p j'C to. Use 0-ye‘th` e 7
2i/relnaffittifil# W04044.0"0-1 DATE : I 7 gl
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :SAL— f —.-
I'APPROVED r-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1NOT APPROVED
f
I
DATE: //2 — /-
SIGNATU550 IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
ri APPROVED FlAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
t 1 NOT APPROVED
Ff-jx'G c/:-7,4t, !'5 -.OA, C.:.)047-4T/4_U y -4•c.
O,e, 5, T -- i4 c /t,1G i%A;E f itrc C 7 u
T/7=e7 rev .lam - /li,,(, t1 L 0—A.4.49,24',e) $"
a iore e ,ram Tipy fir, e2 C
1
l
DATE: 4,— /1f2
SIGNATURE ,QF' 9 RE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
a.1-r .v. I I i‘.i, 1 OL ILLLLCL LR1. UH I G . -- I
n ENGINEERING DIVI )N
L I TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-1/-84
1 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
F-- FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
l ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
I ( OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
APPROVED I ] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
t ( NOT APPROVED
i1‘ A--A. vk
s
DATE : 4
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOROR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
0/APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED
DATE: l
SIGNATUR' OF DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No(s): SA -081-83
Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-071-83
Description of Proposal:Application for site plan approval
to allow construction of three
one-story tilt-up concrete
buildings and one two-story
tilt-up concrete building for a
total of 66,000 square feet on a
4.3 acre site which will be used
for a business park and light
warehousing.
Proponent: Holvick, deRegt, Koering
Location of Proposal: Located at approximately the 800
block of Powell Avenue S.W.
Lead Agency:City of Renton Building and
Zoning Department
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 7, 1983, following a presentation by
Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
Roger Blaylock, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom, Richard Houghton, James Matthew,
David Clemens, James Hanson, Gary Norris and Jerry Lind.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application
ECF-071-83 are the following:
1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Loren Davis, DATED November 14,
1983.
2. Applications: Site Plan Approval (SA-081-83).
3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Fire Prevention Buearu,
Policy Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Building and
Zoning Department, Police Department, Traffic Engineering Division, Design
Engineering Division, and Utility Engineering Division.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERG has determined this development does not
have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
The subject development will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties
and the following requirement shall be complied with:
1. Access roadways from Phase I to the north are to be extended through Phase II to
minimum standards of design required by the Fire Code.
SIGNATURES: tl
Z1/0 -11A, _16(71/71
Ronald G. Nelson David R. Clemens
Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director
Ri and C. Houghton
Public Works Directo
PUBLISHED: December 12, 1983
APPEAL DATE: December 26, 1983
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 071 _ 83
APPLICATION No(s ) : SA-081-83
PROPONENT: HOLVICK DE REGT KOERING
PROJECT TITLE: WASHINTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE STORY TILT UP
CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND 1 TWO STORY TILT up CONC. 131.D . rUN A '1 tT1Y1L ur b6,000 SQ. FT. OF
BLDGS. ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK & LIGHT WARFEOUSINC.
LOCATION: APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
SITE AREA: 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Grose ) : 66,000 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1) Topographic Changes : X
2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X
3) Water & Water Courses : X
4) Plant Life:X
5) Animal Life: X
6) Noise: X
7) Light & Glare: X
8) Land Use; North: WA MOUSE/OFFICE
East :WAREHOUSE/INDUSTRIAL PARK
South: UNDEVELOPED
West :UNDEVELOPED
Land Use Conflicts : MINOR
View Obstruction: NONE ANTICIPA'TtD
9) Natural Resources : X
10) Risk of Upset : X
11) Population/Employment : X
12) Number of Dwellings : X _
13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 263 TRIP FADS (1.363 100% OFFICE-WOP,ST_CASE)
Traffic Impacts : ___WIESECTI ONS OF S.W. 7th & HARDIE AVE. SWI GRADY & POf ALL A\
14) Public Services : X
15) Energy: X
16) Utilities : X
17) Human Health: X
18) Aesthetics : X
19) Recreation: X
20) Archeology/History:X
Signatures :
1(7
z(sityz.
Ronald G. Nelson bavid A. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
1j2„.(144,0(C . PUBLISHED: DEC. 12, 1983
Richard C. Houghto APPEAL DATE DEC. 26. 1983
Public Works Director
6-83
ERC-06 FORM #7
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
BY THERENTON LAND USE HEARINGAPUBLICHEARINGWILLBEHELDR
EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE
SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 10, 1984, AT
9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A)
Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story
tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a
total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a
business park and light warehousing, file SA-081-83; property located at
approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W.
MAMIE SWALES (ECF-054-83)
Application to rezone + 1.3 acres of property from R-1 to L- 1 for future
light industrial development, file R-062-83; property located at 1307
Maple Avenue S.W. and 32:; S.W. 13th Street.
Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning
Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 10, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR
OPINIONS.
PUBLISHED : December 30, 1983 Ronald G. Nelson
Building and Zoning Director
CERTIFICATION
I, JEANETTE SAMEK, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE
DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington
residing in the King County, on the 30th day of
December, 1983.
OF RF
cy z
0
0,
9A
01 4-0 SEPS :
O
City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner
will hold a
PUBLIC
i n
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL
ON JANUARY 10, 1984 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.lv .
CONCERNING: FILE SA-081-83
1 REZONE From_ To _
SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
To
x SITE APPROVAL
I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lou
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
VARIANCE FROM
i S
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT.
ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION
SIGNIFICANT NON-SIGNIFICANT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING& ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT To BE REMOVED WITHOL
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No(s): SA-081-83
Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-071-83
Description of Proposal:Application for site plan approval
to allow construction of three
one-story tilt-up concrete
buildings and one two-story
tilt-up concrete building for a
total of 66,000 square feet on a
4.3 acre site which will be used
for a business park and light
warehousing.
Proponent: Holvick, deRegt, Koering
Location of Proposal: Located at approximately the 800
block of Powell Avenue S.W.
Lead Agency:City of Renton Building and
Zoning Department
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 7, 1983, following a presentation by
Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
Roger Blaylock, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom, Richard Houghton, James Matthew,
David Clemens, James Hanson, Gary Norris and Jerry Lind.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application
ECF-071-83 are the following:
1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Loren Davis, DATED November 14,
1983.
2. Applications: Site Plan Approval (SA-081-83).
3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Fire Prevention Buearu,
Policy Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Building and
Zoning Department, Police Department, Traffic Engineering Division, Design
Engineering Division, and Utility Engineering Division.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not
have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
The subject development will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties
and the following requirement shall be complied with:
1. Access roadways from Phase I to the north are to be extended through Phase II to
minimum standards of design required by the Fire Code.
SIGNATURES:
I(
R nald G. Nelson David R. Clemens
Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director
Ric and C Houghton
Public Works Directo
PUBLISHED: December 12, 1983
APPEAL DATE: December 26, 1983
Y
411111
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF _ 071 _ 83
APPLICATION No(s ) : SA-081-83
PROPONENT: HOLVICK DE REGT KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINI'ON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A
APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT3ONE STORY TILTDescriptionofProject :TO T LT UP
CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND 1 NO STORY •1'1E1' up C:UNU. 131.113. rU.Ft A '1U1AL Ur' b6,000 SQ. FT. OF I
BLDGS. ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK & LIGHT WAREHOUSING
LOCATION: APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWF T L AVENUE S.W.
SITE AREA: 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross ) : 66,000 SQ. FT.
DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) :
IA
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE•
INFO
1) Topographic Changes : X
2) Direct/ Indirect Air Quality: X
3 ) Water & Water Courses : X
4 ) Plant Life:X
5) Animal Life : X
6 Noise: X
7) Light & Glare : X
8) Land Use; North: WAREHOUSE/OFFICEIOUSE/OFFICE
East :WAREHOUSE/INDUSTRIAL PARK
South: UNDEVEppEp
West :UNDEVELOPED
Land Use Conflicts : MINOR
View Obstruction: NONE ANTICIPATED
9) Natural Resources : l X
10) Risk of Upset : X
11) Population/Employment : X
12) Number of Dwellings : X
13 ) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 263 • ix IDS (1,363 100% OFFICE-WORST CASE)
Traffic Impacts : INI`ESECTI ONS. OF S.W. 7th & HARDIE AVE. SW GRADY & POWW1EL.L A
14 ) Public Services : X
15) Energy: X
16) Utilities : X
17) Human Health: X
18) Aesthetics : X
19) Recreation: X
20) Archeology/History:X
Signatures :
7„<„,ityc -c X /X lei
Ronald G. Nelson avid . Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
C - PUBLISHED: DEC. 12, 1983
Richard C. Houghto APPEAL DATE DEC. 26, 1983
Public Works Director
6-83
ERC-06 FORM #7
REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'MENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 071 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS
AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE
SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING.
LOCATION :
APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
TO :
n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83
n ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
El POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P ,M, ON DECEMBER 6, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
14 ° DATE: i
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTORJOR A THORIZED REPR SENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
v---_ I on
REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP I•MENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 071 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS
AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE
SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING.
LOCATION :
APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
TO :
E] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83
ENGINEERING DIVISION
OTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84
UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
1--] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
1PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
12[POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
00THERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5: 00 P,M , ON DECEMBER 6, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
IIl'
DATE ,
SIGNATUR OF DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
r,_ Inn
r
REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP fMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 071 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS
AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINUS ON A 4.3 ACRE
SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING.
LOCATION :
APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
TO :
i IPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83
ENGINEERING DIVISION
i TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84
OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
12DAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
1?DATE :
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
1R)
r
REN1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 071 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS
AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE
SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING.
LOCATION :
APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
TO :
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83
l ] ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84
UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
I ]
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
l ] POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : arkL /1 NarAIEee'Ahc
APPROVED 1APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS f NOT APPROVED
I UTILITY APPROVAL SbbiiLC tit 1
LA1 4GMERS AGREEMENT WATER e I
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER NO '
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER YE<-_ )if., ,, G1¢ 21.AT
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER
Y ;
D.At /ss,fr.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER o + p1.b"16
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER A/0
A
Pp/tb
APPROVED WATER PLAN yk-5 NV M
APPROVED SEWER PLAN ES
APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS
BY FIRE DEPT. Yt-5
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS YES ___I
fr.Ilit
DATE: At - V.3
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
REN- I BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'MENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
EC F - 071 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE :WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS
AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE
SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING.
LOCATION :
APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
TO :
I !
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83
ENGINEERING DIVISION
15<TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84
I ] UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
I ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : af) E'<<
OAPPROVED O APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
tPDATE , S5
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZEH'REPRESENTATIVE j
REVISION 5/1982
i o n
REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP FMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
CITY OF RENTON
ECF - 071 - 83
NOV 3 0 1983
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83
Po,I('„
DEVELOPMFNT nFPT.
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS
AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE
SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING.
LOCATION :
APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
TO :
n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83
0 ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84
n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
EAPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Acme 1?tVcLOP,,,e,y7
n APPROVED Rid-D.-PROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
16 fm eSi// ',kir', : 404 e "twor
ref u remeids v4) r- !>tieje P Use 0-'4 5 •10,7
JL 0 ARA.#14......, DATE: 147 g I
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
1
RENI1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPOTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET If
ECF 071 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS
AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE
SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING.
LOCATION :
APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
TO :
1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83
0 ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
ELBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
El POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Ei OTHERS :
li
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :j P
APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED
III
Ili
DATE : /2 - v
SIGNATUR IRECTOR OR AU ZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP FMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
emu V •iJ
ECF 071 - 83
NOV, 3 0 1983
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS
AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE
SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING.
LOCATION :
APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
TO :
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83
ENGINEERING DIVISION
i i TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84
1 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
giFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
I ] BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
EllPOLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2
I ] APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED
44=ic'GiG,40//,- SA) C.),4 C./TiL
e'/E:02 ,Qe.G 6rG%1--• .c 'A) t"B f ieoTEG%7 ,
nxvIJGJ 's.
viage .r Tv 771-/ct /00277"/ 43E
7f: 1(1,0°,E'o(/6'.' /=',. ,47 c, 44 l .) 1//1n J"TA.te'fa.4/4rJS
EQUi? p ay Ty E y// C vz,e-
DATE: a\- / 2
SI TURE E TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
I TON BUILDING & ZONING ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 068 - 83
APPLICATION NO(S) :PRELIMINARY PLAT (PP-074-83) . PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-075-83)
PROPONENT :CASCADE PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORP./SEA-VAN PROPERTIES
PROJECT TITLE : REPLAT OF CEDAR RIDGE RESIDENTIAL PARK
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PUD APPROVAL
TO REDESIGN AND REPLAT CEDAR RIDGE RESIDENTIAL PARK FROM A MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED ENVIRON-
MENT TO A NEIGHBORHOOD OF SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES TOTALING 138 UNITS,
LOCATION : PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1800 LAKE YOUNGS WAY S.E.
TO :
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-16-83
EIENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION
0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:00 P .M. ON NOVEMBER 15, 1983
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : C
n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
l l NOT APPROVED
Z) r V a v.ei-e_
O
3) 7,2 atie Ls- -74 ikd J r a •c.!a+S --
Jv- 5 'ft.`i/u a.
Ct-; 1/-;1-(_,
7:7
7/e?._
Cr21/ jsiArr-
DATE : i(lry f-3
SIGNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
061
Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983III
ENIVIIRONHEI TAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
II
1
it
ECF - 071 - 83 CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION No ( s ) . SA-081-83 NOV 3 0 1983
1I,
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING POLICY
jDEVELOPMcNTncpr.
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A j
I!
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.
1
BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A
4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED I.OR A BUSINESS PARK ]U I-UK Lfb l WHREFTUU-3111ta.I
LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
3
1
SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :i -
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life : 1/...-
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north : Qffteerbudern`. is
east : Wa rt Nv, Rare f? is I rk
south : /jj evelo 4
west : II
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction : 40'"
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( I T E ) : 1363 R DT(ASso,K e, loo16 err'lice Vr i eta rS,' )
III
traffic impacts :
rrj
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health : v
18 ) Aesthetics : Y
19 ) Recreation : lj
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS : jjs `n O6S-e3 ve off'cvs-p.e.e * Itc,dech neeO5 ec, /dion i r li i o1-till l m1'17tii4v1617
imoSe1jy01 t 'E' o n. s
s a rye.`
Id/Orr a.04-1632, f3,)
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : 5 US0r.. 1 i t 1 e : 16f%f I,K HK r
Date : Ice/4/R.
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 071 - 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.
BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A
4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FUR tIl f(T WARtvamt1Th.
LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment : J(1
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18) Aesthetics:
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : NSI X DOS More Information,
Reviewed by :Title :
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 071 - 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.
BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A
4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED l-OR A BUSINESS PARK / ND IUK LEAJ WARtriUU TTQG.
LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health:
18 ) Aesthetics :
19) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
i/Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
1
Reviewed by :o-- X T itle : C
Date : 6
FORM: ERC-06
e )O '
Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983
EINIVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 071 - 83
APPLICATION No(s ) . SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.
BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A
4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND 1-UK L111111 OREgOusrMta.
LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses : tf
4) Plant life : 1/
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise : L/
7) Light & glare :
8) Land Use ; north:
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset : 1/
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history : r/
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by :
Date : L Z S 3
Z
FORM: ERC-06
TR RFFit
Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983
ENVIROINIMEINITAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF 071 - 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.
BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A
4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED -FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FUR tllattl WA-n r1.
LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :4
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north:
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset : t
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 6,3 ta( ti A
traffic impacts : kf" t`'5
4.a
P Erna/ azc u v/afi.e e a•
14 ) Public services : I
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17) Human health : L
18) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI G DOS More Information
Reviewed by : ()//,,. 1 itle :
Date : A/6" .f
FORM: ERC-06
r a route
Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983
EINIVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 071 - 83
Ij
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.
BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 11
4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSI-NESS PARK AND FUR WARtnunI1Th.
LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) ;
traffic impacts : k
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19) Recreation :
20) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : hale :
Date : /,?
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983
ENVIROINIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET
ECF - 071 - 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deRLGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.I {
BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A
4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK -MU I-IIK LIVNT wxxt Utls1 w.
LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
vf
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north:
east :
south:
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment : v/
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17) Human health :
18) Aesthetics :
19) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNS DOS More Information
Reviewed by : 1 itle :jL/TANG/tlE/
Date :3
FORM: ERC-06
rI IZ6
Date circulated : NuvEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEM SHEET
ECF - 071 - 83
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83
PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING
PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.
BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A
4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FUR LIbHll W -u-i
LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.
SITE AREA :4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : d
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17) Human health:
18) Aesthetics :
19) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendatio • DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by . Title :
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTO01
The Environmental Review Committer (ERC) has issued a final declaration of
non-significance with conditions for the following projects:
CASCADE PACIFIC DEV. CORP./SEA-VAN PROPERTIES (ECF-068-83)
Application for preliminary plat, file PP-074-83, and PUD approval to
redesign and replat Cedar Ridge residential park from a multi-family
attached environment to a neighborhood of single family detached homes
totalling 138 units, file PPUD-075-83; property located at 1800 Lake Youngs
Way S.E.
SHOEM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-069-83)
Application for site plan approval to allow construction of a five story office
building having 13,440 square feet of usable office space, file SA-073-83, and
variance from Section 4-712A(b) to allow building height to exceed
thirty-five (35) feet, file V-079-83; property located at 1420 Maple Avenue
S.W.
HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING (WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER
PHASE 2A)(ECF-071-83)
Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story
tilt-up concrete buildinos and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a
total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business
park and light warehousing, file SA-081-83; property located at
approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W.
D & D FLOOR COVERING (ECF-074-83)
Application for building permit to allow construction of a building having
9,126 square feet to be used for retail/office and warehouse use, file B-302;
property located at 345 Union Avenue N.E.
Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning
Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of EF- C
action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by December 26, 1983.
Published: December 12, 1983
r„,
NOTICE
ENVIRONMENTAL 4
DECLARATION
3 A,
APPLICATION NO. FILE SA-081-83
i'' - PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITF PI AN APPROVAI TO Al LOW CONSIRUCTIi N'
OF THREE ONE STORY TTLT UP CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND ONE TWO STORY IIlT IP CINrRFTE
M.« BUILDING FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ. FT, TO BF USED FOR A BUS. PARK AND I T. WARFHOI I,S I NG,
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
I; LOCATED AT APPR XI(IMMATELY THE 800 BLO .K OF POl I AVEN F S W.
i -'
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
00.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE C E.R.C. 3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
DDOES 24DOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
DWILL WILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M., DECEMBER 26, 1':3
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
235-2550
ice^ -.Xt '
r'..,.
f DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
I
ti(
Y o TY OF RENTC FILE NO(S): _5j F -83
E: ® +BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTM` :NT MIME
ru
MASTER APPLICATION
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those
items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed.
Please print or type. Attoch additional sheets if necessary.)
APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION
i/
NAME
P,
c/vk-k, ds& X0ef I n
FEES
ADDRESS
Q REZONE*(FROM TO
75 Po ll AvC , S,0, oo SPECIAL PERMIT*
CIj ZIP
1 TEMPORARY PERMIT*
J^ , 0 / L;A 160 55 Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*
TELEPHONE#
V v..l.w 1J
SITE PLAN APPROVAL T",3Z5j
2/ ^ /2/.2. GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT
GG.L.L.No. of Cubic Yards:
CONTACT PERSON
VARIANCE
From Section:
NAME
Justification Required
Lo own., 126411S a
ADDRESS
v
j
SUBDIVISIONS:
725 /6.0E11 im • S. toD . Q SHORT PLAT
C
o / i _.& ZI4 E] TENTATIVE PLAT
f/',/; ICyLtL' PRELIMINARY PLAT
TELEPHONE V Q FINAL PLAT
CO)I O L 222 0 WAIVER
ll Justification Required)
OWNER NO. OF LOTS:
NAM PLAT NAME:
floivibk,k.c)._1---in6ADDRESSv ` PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:
72 Pc to&l Ave • S.0. a PRELIMINARY
CI
1
ZIPa FINAL
k W n[
iC 5 P.U.D. NAME:
TELEPHONE
2cX7) 22Co -/222 0 Residential Q Industrial
0 Commercial ED Mixed
LOCATION
MOBILE HOME PARKS:
PROPERTY ADORES
ow^(Jl/ Ave ,SI , ' , Q TENTATIVE
EXISTING USE PRESENTCLZONING
0 PRELIMINARY
Vet-C -4 -1);e/d MP J FINAL
PROPOSED USE
1
PARK NAME:
ci / iakcs c h(Jlldirns NUMBER OF SPACES:
W/ paAIk * klthapi5 W ENVIRONMENTAL RE IE.4 COMM.CITI TEE 1
SQ. FT ACRES
AREA: /66 j Jr7o 3 i U'.4L FEES 175os
AfP USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
f1<
0
DATE a I 0 L U Lt'! 1_!7 'Li)APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: T CAX -
i NOVvjY14JAPPLICATIONDETERMINEDTOBE:
ElAccepted
i ! s NC y,,E 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By:
Initials)
DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY:
1
APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
V OV• 'O - 1 ED Accepted
QIncomplete Notification Sent On By:
Initials)
ROUTED TO:
Q Building Q Design Eng. EJ Fire Parks
Q Police ID Policy Dev. J Traffic Eng. Q Utilities
REVISION 5/1QR2
r
Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet).
AFFIDAVIT
I, Ct' being duly sworn, declare that I am
a orized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
r DAY OF
19_ "<-) .
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT
Name of Notary Public)ig iature of Owner)
1<
Address) Address)
90.0S
City) State) (Zip)
z2G — lz0,
Telephone)
Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete
application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in
the "Application Procedure."
Form #174
a GA
6, N
i
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
CITY gas R t4T9idENVIRONMENTALCHECKLISTFORML.a t; ,
t,...4 ., ,
i:l .
a
NOV 141983uij
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . I3U:i DAGailiNIN(. JET i.
Application No. 5A — 02/-63
Environmental Checklist No. c C i— O 7/-/P 3 t
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date:
0 Declaration of Significance ODeclaration of Significance i
0 Declaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
i
1
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
ipreparedforallmajoractionssignificantlyaffectingthequalityoftheenvironment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a I
proposal is such a major action. i
I
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your 1
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- E
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
i
i
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
i
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent JI/C)/1//4:ea41 4':Vt,/-7/ 52. Address and phone number of Proponent:
41
72 encoell 4V2 , S,I0,
rte. Joo
3. Date Checklist submitted 4/LICI Anbe ' !995
4. Agency requiring Checklist G c5 /e i
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
tADCGV6i. TeC-AiLiczu ader - Phcz.. 2A
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and na ure) :
Coh s-1rvc
I ) s rci c .
i/rb G 7c a , rccworby-
o00 nit A. 4,' c:crt s d IO d.
1
1
ccn s`lrt-{ .D S Gtxp-6 5co.L2ulatiVe.gio_fi 'av a res •
s
k j' a
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the en"iron-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
i Ls;
r e
S g/ASs CaVP1`. 71 1e. C 5
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
Svrnrrw - - /984
9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
11cCnd sah7 lt7/-- 41. coo c lit$
EledrI MQ- a.4.;Cid
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:
Yes . Ad ?k 0J k ((a)o i.. -
Wes+r co E, 1. Si
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain:
Jo
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
TES- MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?RV ATM' Ai
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
am jXbP - MAYBE
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site?
YES
X-
WATEE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
PEA— MAYBE gL
Explanation:
n Ire- a t
CO 9Anktil 44/- a 0
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
YES MAYBE N
b) The creation of objectionable odors?
YES MAYBE
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally?
YES MAYBE NU—
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? 1ff MM YBE W6—
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
YES MAYBE N
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
YES MAYBE
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
Yt MAYBE N
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
YES MAYBE O
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria ,
or other substances into the ground waters?
YEV MAYBE A
1 ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies? A-MAYBE AExplanation: (b)A cD /c-t drzt.i e. ed i u/
be.. cia6Ked .
co karma/ b.ryk Q G-
Vcy. c U. coif Grcor:
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
J
a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,,]
microflora and aquatic plants)?
PIPIT
A
AU—
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
Yrr- MAYBE ;11C-
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species?V14- MAYBE W
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
vrr- t-
Explanation: (a.) & i . /s r2t9161iES ii/l
d nnaied--;as co;11
b ,4roccd.
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
YT MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
YES RA-YIT NO
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?
ES MAYBE NO
Explanation: iveA.0 etCdi / IL)//1 QCC-or .
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?YK MAYBE T.
Explanation: Q on ~ SI f5 A Wit( b / k/.
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area?
YES WPTIff NO
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
Y M YBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
k
E MAYBE W
Explanation: N
i
p r), A tad/ LizQd cJc f.
C.o 7rbceg8S
riA tx.)/ / c, .
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
Y! MAYBE N
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location. distri-
bution, density. or growth rate of the human population
of an area?
Y MAYBE N
Explanation:
5-
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
VET M O
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES M YBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking?
VET-
1
M YBE
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
yr MTTWE
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
Yam- MAYBE M
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Yam— MAYBE go--
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
YET— MAYBE N
Explanation: A, . . AP_G • Ar _ 1 . .
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection?
YES MAYBE Nb—
b) Police protection?YK MAYBE kb—
c) Schools?
YES MAYBE 4-
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads?41c— MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?i
YES WATTE NO
c
Explanation: LEA //
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? XTMMAYBE
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
Y
the development of new sources of energy?
f,,,
MAYBE F[
Explanation: 00) vif_ `k 71 jEl
4,34 j rz22u irC/,
4-
E
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
a) Power or natural gas?
FaTirr }3-
b) Communications systems?
Y E3 WATIlt +ice
c) Water? X
YES MAYBE NO
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? A MAYBE WU—
e) Storm water drainage?
f) Solid waste and disposal?
VES M Y8E NO
Explanation: /Jr,s.L2J 5 !LCC4.. —LpS 40/V
T.
I
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
VET MAYBE N0'
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
FES MAYBE
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
VS- MAYBE 0
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
Yam- MAYBE
Explanation:
III . SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
signed)
name printed)
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
I I'
ase H
F
CITY O R((ENTON
1
NOV 14 1983 1
C
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
100000..
I•
1
r
y,
94•
I
1
I
Kim Lighting, Inc.
SUBSIDIARY OF
CORPORATION I
1 I
I
I
I
I
Al '1 ,. , ,I ,, '.,"'"IN<'t I 11111'I
7 T""T.T T.._r-ViiiirirlikirAlriffirritri
40' Scope
38'
36'
34'
32'
30'
28'
I•—
26'I,-
24'
22'
20'
18'
16'
14'
12'
10' EKG—Series 200 EKG—Series 100 EKG—Series 300
8'
6'
4' Phase II Phase I Phase III
2' 175 Watt 250 Watt 400 Watt
250 Watt 400 Watt 1000 Watt
Applications Pedestrian ways Collector and local roads Major roads and whiteways
Plaza areas Intermediate commercial Large parking lots
Parks Medium size parking lots Expressways
Residential roads Security lighting Sports areas
Small parking lots Residential roads Security lighting
Kim Lighting, Inc.Building entrances Highways Automobile dealers
Printed in U.S A.
s
r C./TY Of RENTON L L A - 0/6-83
Y
LE6AL 465CR/PTION
r LOT / THE NORTH WOO fffT Of LOT 4 AND ALL 0f LOT 3 Of
RE/TON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 002-83 AS RECORDED IN KING
COUNTY RECORD Of SURVEY VOL. 34, PAGES 254 AND 2.54A UNDER
RECORDViV6 MO 8301259002. 2 .: ,..
4.
LOT 2 LOT G Of RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 002-83 AS
i}fEC 4'DED /N K/N6 COUNTY RECORD Cr SURVEY VOL. 34 PAGES 254
AND 254 A UNDER RECORDING' NO 8301259002.
EXCEPT THE NORTH /d6.00 ffET TH/EREOf.
APPROYALS
TN/S RECORD Of SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED TO DOCUMENT. A LOT
LINE REY/S/ON WITHIN Pt C/I7 L//,1/TS Of RENTON.
EX4/1/NED AND APPROVED pm tor Of A.O. /983
ri
Q/RECTOR - OffT a'PUBLIC NORA'S
EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY Of AD 1983 T.
GF
4 EXAt-//NED AND APPROVED T///S LO4Y Cr AD /983 r, ;:; :.:76- =
k:
Itl'
41
f
h'/N6 COUNTY ASSESOR DEPUTY ASSESSOR
i
4
1
i
t. AD,Q NE*NE4 5EC 24, TefA/, Rd E 14%M
A/G COUNTY, '4 //it/G7ON I
Dos/5 OF BE4.Q/NG FCITY O/^ RFNTON+
4-
PLAT OF /'V45I////G7O/J Tff.UN/COL 4 ' Li' [1 ;! L5
i. CE,(/TE ' , I' L /ft, , 65 ,e- /Ot.
ECOYQOS OF .-/.VG c0 dw..f,v N O V 14 i g83 I--)
I/OTt 71//5 ORDw/AJG 5/1014' • LOT ylF wri.pi-.
L/,VE REv/5/ON DA/L Y 4.'O
1' liO E45E,4,fEc//5,
7
11 '0 14110/ 44 LOT 4
I__ 1.-1FUTURE !
LOT i ----=:----
i _F I E , T. r- l,
1--i ...‘k... :---- - 1 r- /
LOT i
1
L.
S.W. SEVENTH ST.
rr -------'ti-G-----—71- r.
xeirillitnVJ on Industrial park1
C=--- -'-I-jf' 1 by burtington northern in
FUTU i., EI ft------1 2
0G
T'--;...1:-..i,:77T. ---c-'
1-
ii 111 1 il---C
Ims:0-, •„ PHASE 2A
1
ka al
e • r., -:-3C:
z 1 ..--- •
ZIN .r.:Agt 1 .,1111 NORTH
rTi..---... . -ELL
isij
SITE AI!
ell
WILA „, or
CE
VIOIROTV MAP
CITY cf±: RENTON ........
iii 4 kri l,k7. . \'fr IC ii
NOV 14 1983 i1.
I
1:_____.:____ park entrance BUILDINGiL...;r,i:NG DEFT.
4
0•4 ,--------
FEET millnipaimm 0GIIP' - o 100 200 300
PROIECT wA-.51-11wc,-row erATE. TEC-HNICA.L- 1_1-rEg THE
JOB NO. -- e!.1 ...____ MAEHLUM.
DATE 11171;g9_,
GROUP
DETAIL vic-mirry MAP
ARCF-IITECTS
SCALE 1":-5oo'-o"
51-1._EET r 0E-i
0
Ca.leo Mat/-
Tri -„,,
3,
5. !.! )rw ST. 1, ,,o
A/BB'!3'GYJ' !f/ I\ .
1-ems.t4'•
je-ofivpre"
P=r ao
i
6' d
EX/9T£E54 e
g7CDP l17',itIL
a EX/ST is
0/J.c//NEQ
PI s '/i089
Q00 s 046'
NQ6'453'7Y
l ‘%.AYE9
V'.
LOT ifs .
g
i
i2f/6/NAL LOT LINE
wad•4csvr"0 46
I` S,
t.
rj}4.1
ti fir; gni46
J,P/DO /B051Q•
7.........."., Neff Z01C/NE v
to •
8 io
f Rs
S
4 *-4 4OT. z •
b
b
l04/
CITY OF RENTON •
N, IL'
tR61 I -' .'ttlr I z'•
1 S DiNOV14 "ij.:3r0
II
1
1
ITY OF RENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
FEE SCHEDULE
APPLICATION FEE
APPEALS OF LAND-USE OR ADMINISTRATIVE
DECISIONS 75
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 450
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:
Environmental Checklist Review/
Threshold Determination 55 if value less than $10, 000
60 plus $1 per $10,000 if
value greater than $10, 000
Pre-Draft Consultation Report $100 plus $25 per acre
Environmental Impact Statement,
Draft and Final (Costs of
Coordination and Review) 100 plus equivalent of City
cost incurred
Environmental sensitive land
or lands covered by water 11 times the above listed fees
GRADING AND FILLING PERMITS 300 plus $25 per acre
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS 50
MOBILE HOME PARKS:
Tentative 150 plus $1 per acre
Preliminary 300 plus $5 per lot
Final 150 plus $2 . 50 per lot 1111
OPEN SPACE 30
PLATS: Short Plat , Residential/ 300
Commercial/Industrial 75 plus $1 per 1 ,000 square
feet (not less than $175)
Tentative Plat 150 plus $2 per acre
Preliminary 300 plus $8 per lot
Preliminary Industrial 600 plus $1 per 1 , 000 square
feet of land area
Final 225 plus $4 per lot
Final Industrial 375 plus $10 per acre
P.U. D. : Preliminary Plan 750 plus $20 per acre with
1 , 000 maximum
Final Plan 750 plus $20 per acre
REZONE 300 plus $10 per acre
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT 100 if value is less than $50, 000
1111 150 if value from $50, 000 to
100, 000
200 plus . 01 % of value over
100, 000
IBITE APPROVAL 300 plus $ 5 per acre
SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMPORARY PERMIT/
CONDITIONAL PERMIT 300 plus $10 per acre
VARIANCE 75 if value is less than $2, 500 -
150 if $2, 500 or greater.
WAIVER OF IMPROVEMENTS 75
ENDING
OF FILE II
FILE TITLE
6/
I