Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA81-017D
BEGINNINGG
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
41e
A r . -
P 7:,n r rk
Willt-, , ,,. ..
u...,. c.0
v ..,:,,
i
1
0/ 77(31
i I
OF RA,
4
0j., 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
I'
0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL tVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
O9
TFO SE404°' t
BARBARA Y. SHI POCH
MAYOR
1
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 7, 1983
TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney
FROM: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: BLENCOE/K-MART JOINT USE PARKING LOT
The K-Mart Corporation has granted. Harry. Blencoe a five 15) year lease to 1
utilize excess parking on the south side of S. 3rd Place to allow the
expansion o Tr. Blencoe' s medical office building on the north side of S. 3rd
Place. Th- Land Use Hearing Examiner approved the site plan for the office 1
building expansion, file SA-017-81 , conditioned upon provision of off-site
parking. he lease provides'a sufficient number of parking spaces.
Under Sect on 4-2204(6) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance, both the
Building a d Zoning Department and the City Attorney must approve the parking
arrangemen . Please find attached a copy of the lease agreement. The
Builbcfril a d Zoni ng Department has approved the;'a 'Peement based on design and
function. Please review and comment to our off;ice. I have informed Mr.
Bl encoe Yth t a written response would come from the Building and Zoning
Departm nt
N opRJB:cl 1 43 '
0022Z
SO
Attachment
1
1
1
i-
1
A eal )(I ai - ijiz•,1/4)-1-. a ),1 ;
A. ....,
R L
I
i •
ii.',:,.' -a•-t.,1
LI)k.,/ SC0 )r- 1 ilt C
4,-;'':'7:7-'''-'1 1';:, ';?1
4. :•
14 '; - ;;;" '.• - ; • ., •t k •
f•
1_, -a I . -__;,41-7,a`te; , '''• c'aa
1 . s
ll,
1...
444H:::-::;':::::-:
i• 1.'.r' '
7'.'''"-•"!.,' •
r.';`;'-'4';',7;13'• ..
s......'..........,......;
I
I
so•
I. ;.. . . _ . . .. _. .
t,„,. 6,a ,
1_ ...,..
1-1::,,..,...
k.,..,, .•,,....:„k.,,,,_.:, ;,,,,c, -,..,, .'.4.;'4'''. --„„- -.':,-
I A' . ' „ ' ..' . -;.'''. ' , -_;;-• ,,- .-. - ..'
s);';',..;:tq..1'''''1.--;',.:' . ','''. '' • • , ,-;,.-,}:-. ;_,• . ,
C.
f:-:',-:''..6V,1•=,:;:.:=''-.1. -, .';':.' ,
i-;•:-.:..,:-..:1,-,--,...'c;',0::, :'''.-:r,; .,'',-, ' t,-:J"`-•';''',.",c;,;,:.i,,.'."- --.s.'it'.**-•;,-4-4ak m.,, )-.. -
4 c- ".,,..
sr.',..-.:;;-,
i...',.,...:("...,.P.1...*;
Z.11•:!1,"t$,...:,15
4,4,7.,,!,-. ,„
I
1
1
1.• . 1 ./• ,,,?...,
i‘tirlst.„ ..*-2K -4 ‘"3 "
N I,. 4.. " 7,_,_ ..1 i/ tid S ii .--,.. - . .,..-:-..r., ,,;,-:.,s--...i,..--,' „.. l' i , , -. -: :,,..4' ' ,...' ri tro co d'i-cl I °4(I -
1-41 ft4,.. 't,'" -`'-, '- '- ,
1,T 1
1147.q Li _ _ _ ,,....27-'1,31CiiiPSallidlitil2:: r13. - +
5,,,,..-*,•,-wir:.• , I t ''''-,,fl.,,,,, II--ff Jr- ,4,:44;..M. ,1.c........:=H-7"-^",-...
t0 ..i. • - -
I
i 1) i'''.
lc, P --i el (I, h
1
b r, IL'c r 1- a A) d
2,
1, t• -,'-- •.• ...,`.:,
5
p. •-••,. -7 - -,R. ,r ,-.... -
j.„...,,,1;14 •'•,r . ,..o...t. .r. .
c 40446 :-,!. "
a %
z-:—=_.....,_ ___.. .., .
4„,,
I, A-A
1 I-- , v;....iii.4-i_ =,.....
j ..„ __,.. 83 I 1 f.-,- ..-'''''''-4'
fi. '','''i '''T:-;,--:,:,,- ,-'-'1-,"1 ,5F-.'' . .,,,.,-1,——--1 I ii aro-: ''
rni; . ..,'- - _::-- "fi- .. '---...--mr.
r-i.... ... .. - 1..-4--a4.;
z,,,,,,,,,,i.. ,...,,„......... ....-
r--5-,..- -,
1
I
0 0 '0 \
1
1 •
I 1
r- Id j'& c1
a
tw
tl YY,s'3t'
2 vt - w
1
r
4'.
t
r ..., '
I
a tit' C
P '
7J
i
1
1
3 5 0 , 'g J_+a,.
t.
L"41 rr'1 1 tl r
L': '',W7 .'
n;
o`\
I
i 1
11
1
1
1
Li y
1 I-
I
I I 4)
1
t.'':'47.,:.;..'Y.-.',', -,-.,:.:... ..' .--,-, '... ,!,-.. -• ,.. .'• :' --,.-.;',''.;.,.' .,-,.,'-',,,',.,; :, ::,- ',„._
ittr,': :.:',e3-4.. ..5, 1'';-r,'i',71i' ''- '''. .-.*;;;',",''. ,-''."r.'';'!';:-;;;'''.1kg, .,;'" ' j• !
1
1:''.-';'fo,1,4T;,:,_:;:t:- .-.:
4'.1 .f.4,40-;t.v.;,.--...-„1:1,f,..,'..7_,..Z.-:4i',,!,,'Y,', -.--;;-L:1-:.',:-,'e_.,..,,,..., ,.,,I.,:.);,e0„,:t4, .,:-I'- '.-'-• I
4:: '7-,
1::',,:;."'.'-'41.;,,Wt-;;.4, ;.-. „i---73*--v. '-'-':n.,-6.'--3:-4....,.', ,,,.:•5t-'-',.:--- : - -.!
4 •,,,A.,-.,..,,,i4k.::z1,-,.,1,5:4-,.4t.:1,,:!.,x,-,:-:-.:!_,T.,.-::-.•-,.. ,• _,.:,_.-T,,,47,,,/,..0.47,-_,,w;,..:„ _- , 1
it,',-4:,,,z,.- --,- 7.,--..:-_,:--.1-•,,,,,,,-
r-:,-.-,,,,.--.:, :. ::. .. -.----,,, ,•‘'-!.,--,,, -:,.--. •:- - -.---,;., • - •
1t.i,*.y„,::,,,,_,,.--„,."=-:;..,:.,-1....:.:--,,-. -,.:: --.::_.,:. :.:----.,:-.‘,-.: -., „'-...",,:.!-_,_ . '__ •• ; :1._
c-s,z, y- t< )
1
1' !
10.r. .
I
1
1 . ,
7
1 111 ' !I - 1 lal ' • '
S
7`..-—.::*'. ,,., -.,2:-‘.,.. -,,,„7,-....,-,• -,-_,,,;,!,'':',,,..,,.. . . 77.. ,........ i---------—-
1
600\
I
1 I
1
0-',
m%;:„;-.,;,, ,•:,6: :,;-4,..'-•-:.
Ii.-'. ' i..7.'455,4l.7," ,, .--kt-ii,N7, ., ,47,,, .--':
d,/..,•.e.:-..,-c4',... -,U• .-- • ,, z.....-.3., -
71e7:;:- .'14J-;•t•---.' "'1.:-:.'--:'''''-`•'.-'':';'.f.-..:::;,-; •:: " -"-,''''. ' '.
I m. .13],I P_ "
I :'
1
Aly
I
4
0 -
1
1
TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
r
i1,'il ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
l
u
i
FOR OFIFICE USE ONLY 'a5,:
ii
a/7 _ F`
OAppliclIationNo. r
t
Enviroonmental° Checklist No. Eg/' 0.'o-ii
ifi
PROPOSED, date: • FINAL , date:
11
0 Decilaration of Significance 0 Declaration of Significance
aDec IIlaratio,n of Non-Significance t] Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
rl
Introduction ' The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, R W, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values oth for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whither or not a
proposlal is such a major action.
Please' answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are require , or where
you beilieve an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. Y u should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Y ur answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental revi w now, with-
out du"'plicating paperwork in the future.
l'il
NOTE: , This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and contir1ue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I
I . (;,BACKGROUND'
1. Name of Proponent H. A. BLENCOE and JANET BLENCOE
i.
l 2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
Ih 112 Monterey Dr. NE, Renton, WA 9805,5
I 255-7376 (Home) & 255-4400 (Office)
3. . Date Checklist submitted
I
4. Agency requiring Checklist Hearing Examiner
5. Name of proposal , if applicable: New Addition - Second Floor Medical-Dental
1.
i Units - Total 6,000 square feet plus new parking for 30 cars, aved.
HI 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
r,size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
I^understanding of its scope and nature) :
1
I'; We plan on adding a 6,000 square foot second floor medical-de tal facility
on the present site and also update the present building by air conditioning
I'' and new heating units as well as adding 30 parking stalls in addition to the
II
I; ten we already have making a total of 40 parking stalls.
l
I.
II,
I t•
2- X
1
7. Location of proposal (describe the ((physical setting of the proposal , as well \
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) : (
Subject location is on 3rd Place' South, one—half block from Rainier Avenue
and one—half block from Shattuck Street and just north of the K—Mart Store.
li
8. Estimated date for completion of t} e proposal :
Estimated date for completion of this proposal will be 18 months.
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local--including rezones) :
ri
10. Oo you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain:
I
This is the only future addition we have in mind for the subject site.
di
if
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes , explain: IINo
iII.
ti
12. Attach any other application formithat has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed '' but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of suchIapplication form:
See attached application for variance
Ci
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "mraybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result sin:
ii
a) Unstable earth conditions ordin changes in geologic
substructures?
X
DES MAYBE NO
I
b) Disruptions, displacements , ,'compaction or over-
covering of the soil?i. YES MAYBE NO '
f
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
ES MA BE NO
i
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physicals features? X
it YES MAYBE NO
Ij
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site? j X
fi YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or.
changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which ?
may modifyOthe channel of ai! river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay,; inlet or lake?
YES MBE NO
Explanation: fpl
it •
y,
1I
r' ).k.
Mr -7'11 3-
01
2) Asir. Will the proposal result in :
II
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
X
quality?
i
YES MAYBE NO
1 b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
YES MAYBE NO
Ij c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
1 or any change in climate , either locally or
regionally?
X
I, YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
I;
l
11
PI(
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
l a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of
I
water movements , in_ either marine or fresh waters?
YES MAYBE NO
II b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or
X
1
the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
i,
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course,or flow of flood waters? X
YES MAYBE
Ili d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
II; j body?
X
YES MAYBE NO
s
w e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
YES MAYBE NO
i
I f) , Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
i1 g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
Ithrough direct additions or withdrawals , or through
1
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations,?
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
41 direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
t phosphates , detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria,
l or other substances into the ground waters?
X
I YES MAYBE NO
ill 1 ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?
YES MAYBE NOj
Explanation:
r1
14
11
1 (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
1I • (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
r species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
X
li
ii1 YES MAYBE NO
1,I
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
X
1i endangered species of flora?YE5 MAYBE NO
111
11 c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area., or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
I; species?
X
1
YES MAYBE NO
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
1; YES MAYBE NO
W Explanation:
r
I
U.
I,
li
4- ._ it.
I
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result iris
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, ljbenthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
1, X
i YES MAYBE NO
b) •Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
Xendangeredspeciesoffauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna? 1 X
1 YES MAYBE NO
i
d) Deterioration to existing fisph or wildlife habitat?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: Ii
f'
1
I
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase! existing noise levels? X`
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: _ 1!
I •
dI
7) Light and Glare. Will. the proposal produce new light or
glare? is X
it YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: I
I'I
rl
8) Land Use. Will' the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: 1.
1,
1
11
1
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of useof any natural resources? X
i YES MAYBE NO
b) .Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
l,, YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:'i
Ii
1
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposall involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in, the event of an accident or upset conditions'? X
ri YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:it '
11
1
o
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rater;of the human population X
of an area? a YES MAYBE NO
I,
1
11
Explanation: P,
ill-
II
I'1
I(
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or
create a demand for additional housing?
Iy YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
Is
14I
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
111 YES MAYBE NO
I`
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking? X -
li YES MAYBE NO
i
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?X .
YES MAYBE NO
1. d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
II movement of people and/or goods?
X
S YES MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to 'waterborne, rail or air traffic?l X
it YES MAYBE NO
11 f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
X
bicyclists or pedestrians?
YES MAYBE NO
1,Explanation: Proposed improvements will increase the number pf doctors
therefore increase the number of patients seeing the doctor and increase
I the number of parking required by a proposed 30 stalls.
i,
III
1'14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in. any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection? X
1 YES MAYBE NO
i b) Police protection? X
I YES MAYBE NO
illi
c) Schools?
YES MAYBE NO
III d;) Parks or other recreational facilities? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , •including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
Li f) Other governmental services? X
YES MAYBE NO
1
Explanation:
Ij'
1
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?X •
YES MAYBE NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
1 the development of new sources of energy?
X
YES MAYBE NO
f ,1! Explanation:
il
11
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
1' (a) Power or natural gas?
X
I YES MAYBE NO
11 b) Communications systems? X
I YES MAYBE NO
li (
c) Water?
11 YES MAYBE NO
ii
RICI i y f,. .
Y 1
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? i X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage? 1 X
YES - MAYBE NO
f) Solid waste and disposal? • j
i YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
II
illIl
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any 'health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?I.
Ali YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: I'
r
I
i
18) Aesthetics. Will the .proposal resk,ult in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to Ole public; or will the
proposal result in the creation of,ian aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? - X
YES MAYBE' NO
Explanation:
a
I
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity' of existing recreational opportunities? IL_
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: s4
f
a,
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or.'historical
site, structure, object or buildi'hg?
o,l
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: . VI
it
iI
ill
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understoid that -the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this 'checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
P r o p o n e n t: r CJ:0 c---- t
a; s gned)
7/ 1/L7 .23 L:-/Ye, ,OE
name printed)
1
e1
i'I
w,j City of Renton
i Planning Department
5-76
1
1
h•
1,1
i`.
1
r
DS 313,11 g a.1I N88°4o5O "w
6'.
M -y c
z
16'far`' SPkd
i9_
ti 2 P, ill
516n1100d.541i)
1 5 6 a_ - ? - - s - -CJ -- ' - "o/d poi/Rood C n
1 .• - -
l - -L
71- 0 RENT
W .1 F A N G S
I g. /
i
P
i.:
i 1
I' I',
I
1
1
I
1
1
a, !
I,-'
5°, 7.3///e.0 ! 51,7 I,, 1
I ' 1.0.','',•
spyv,.
1 IIi ,
li, .:.,.p'.....
i• i ,,.;-).,,i.,..t,...,..-..
1
4. 1 14,o .,•.06 • , 5-0 I So L SO
5.5, -4,zei —4-475-w- •iik.
42ij.-1;',:ii• ...:,
4:,,,-
i'
8,
2';'11.ii ::513:./.11
c ,__ _.\c 1 t'•
5,, 6 , 7
7,7e1N --,"
N -41-i'zg•gtt•O ,, i
I6s ..,:::i'f.r.:5110,'.2.-'
4'::',":' .958N.
sl:
i s0.
14-------
79. 1 tool 1 .1 162,
6..z
i
iti I'
11
4 \ :576; Ill4.1-'„4;04,;',,I i
S \ 2
I ,.:. ,•': PLC ... HI0 --; ..,•,:;,t,,1
1 1•,:',,..1 ; • 1147•A?r,,,•-,! _____________
I I
4......,,,old-..,...., 1...;''•,..',.1'.
r;':-
4,i,'Ik,-...' i i
1
i 1
e• ...P..''-_,;'',41„,q.
1 V•;-:•.','!i•::"!.,:,',
7 . 1
1',,!-.'",;''• i ,1:,•,,,,)1 i",:',_' 7 f,77=A.,4.r,.''ir,_1,•;•?;;;4.',, 0 ".,
sk:,.',I iii i•I,','''
4.'..1'..:.Z.X4CI: `'t.:-'','' 'fr.'.- .'-'"'"'". . - '. '"-.:. '
i. '.,..,,!", ,,,,.--,-,.- , ..••4 ''-"."?:.;'74;t'''''..',''''.il'.'".01 fl.'4,. '
1:::-.
4.7:: " • I t"'T ' '1.•'',, ".•.1'‘' bII',,,.
4 Z
J)I4:, •;0:4'; J`,r,--,-,..:
i.t., ...
3V,., ,,:,;',. '.1:i.111.:$"-7
i,', .;,:.,:l.;,4'.',0;'''',1"4. ', V',(
1
1',,,f'S li.i, •, 1';,' -.';; ..?,.r4,1 k•—•
c.,.eI'
4',.'i'l. ,
1',57',•',••• ,
r,•.4ri,f,-- •( i
f,':. .
61.;;;C,
I
I
0
II
1
i ;
ii_
1A
111 , ,,.
inilr
rr !
I
1
I \( )\
l
1 ,
r .
i
111.
1II.
i5i •
J,-
t,...
t
1 ,.
Q
1
e . .
z..
i
7 .
4
ts
41
I
H
s , ..
1 -]
i .
11
5IAO,/
4+
1
t
1.
J..,..,
I.
1'.-.-
t*
Mpph,
n
3
tiI.
1ie.: • •
tt...,
0 ,
7.
i ;•, • ---. - _ , -_
s- ;
g.,•(
yam
4'
1
tillt - -
r,
i.. "
L.;'; ...
i
40
4,
3135\ "; , -
k
Q
g
f
V
i./ .: ' _
a..
L
N
W
i.
I
l
I
O`
T'
I•+}
I.
r'-
1 +
i„'
ty__'
r.
4.r. '
T
1
I
4•
7
y
5Tc1\
n
r '+' - _
1. -
w
lo
1
y
i
41
I.
uil
71
n. `.. \- ;•,,
rr
t
4.
M , '
Sr!-
e
w
i9d,
Inc
i
ramZ , .
i
g
Yl
z
q
iH •
J
qi
bG , ., '
ii
i . '
1'
j +
l
iJJP,
S '
4
f
I
s:
R.
s
1
I
1.
1
ma
o
1
1
L_ •
TODWI]
4
G.
T
4.
j
t
1
ic
t,
4.,-._-.
i
i .,,. ''..,,,-
li__:
Is .+•
z, - • \(
R-
2'
5eNfoR
uu
Goa . ':
1 •,
I
L
e
Z-
N --
1
V1k- ...
I
r'''-
e ; _
lT.-
i .
i.,
L. •
es,
1 '
5 ,
WO..,. ...
SCNOOx- ...'
I /`
I`
Ll. '
i
U .,•'
00.'• '
P
mil
p
x
x , °(
r
I
T
a...
L
y
w
s
I
1- `.-'.
I .
L.-
r-
1
JI
irrr -
r,
t •
I ,
I; {
II,
I
I
1 •
f '
1
1 .>•
I'
d'
al.-';
1>
II
r
r
Pr
i.
1r
S
h :
s;
ti
n
i. +
L•
U
ldil.
l•
rl.
i !)
1. -
t
Cr'
S •
a _
i . ,
ri
1
c
ee
t, `?
f
1-
l -
i. $
1
l•
I'
4„
t.
1
fl_
TH.
I'!
1 [
I
I
J
Ll" '
u
j
i.
11,
1..
1 .
1
c
p.
R3r
y ., '"'
i2
t
i
j . .
1_ ®
1. ,
k'
7
l7 /
i -//
i
4-
1
4.:-*
I
C
4
I. {
y/
I-
1k/.
fit
Y
c
I.. •
a
Il
I
M
tt,/-,/
q(,`
p(
11'
7•+., /
f
V " ,,
1 ',
XI'
IV.
t
ts, ---
t`` -,. .-
urr
stI
1,
Q.
Ll"
llli "'{
i
11
1' '
Q'
J
4 • ' ' '
i,.
wt11
i.
w
1
Q
t4:
li
fir"':
s
I
I. /
5)
40
1
K
r .,' , `
1
1,
e
11
1V \
t(
lif• /'
11
inill,
h
T,,,,,,,, .
7.:
r
t.
7.
7,
7 '., $
OilRy ;:
t.,
1
t.
7 •,
4„,
4.
it
r *
e'
Ili' •
14
J
r
AIII !.
K' -
77H
LIT
I
rr,
1
1
7
y
y`
r ..
f
I—
II
B
I
h
1,
o
t
1_
1
L
L.
I
II
I
I
1
1
1
r :
i
N',,,,. ^
13 $ ) '
C
1
I•
5'
21N;
Ou`-'.!..
L..?"-
G
v.-
R
n
r1II
S
i, .
I,
I.
gyp
u
k'
k
1 ,
r-'
y
51
1JI7,(
i
11" .
p ) .
A,
IrI •
y..
1
Iri..
11Till .!
S,
ytlll .'
cc^
m
1
AFFIDAVIT
I, H. A. Blencoe and Janet Blencoe being duly sworn, declare (that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing st tements arid answers herein contained and the information
herewith sub itted are lin all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed a d sworn before me
this llth dair of February 19 81 ,
I '
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Renton
w /_ ,0 1
Na of Not r Public 'i nature of OwnerYIg
e,c1.4,-,,,,Li
i • 3 `
e 1"Y'112 Monterey Dr. NE
Address) Address)
Renton WA
City) State)
255-7376 (Home) 255-4400 (Office)
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing th- filing of such application .
Date Receive 19 By :
I
I
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
1
Form #116
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
CITY OF RENTON
1 1/- 0 (F-J2/
FOR OFFICE SE ONLY
APPLICATION NUMBER V413 `"W DATE OF FILING 6 f- g'D
RECEIPT NUMBER 9 14-•d DATE OF HEARING i- -8---
GRANTED DENIED APPEALED
r
NOTE TO APPLICANT: READ INSTRUCTION' SHEET CAREFULLY BEFORE PREPARING APPLICATION.
1 . Name of Applicant H. A. BLENCOE/JANET BLENCOE
2. Address of Applicant 112 Monterey Dr. NE, Renton, WA 98055
3. Telephone Number of Applicant 255-7376 (Home) & 255-4400 (Office)
4. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY INVOLVED 138, 200, 206 3rd Place So. , Renton, WA 98055
1 5, 6, 7,
5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED: Lot 8 & 9 Block 1
Plat Wefancs Addition (See Over)
6. State EXACT Variance Requested Request variance of 20 parking stalls
The proposed building improvements require 60 parking stalls total whereas we
will have existing and proposed 40, therefore, we are short 20.
7. Why can't the property be developed within the requirements of the ordinance?
Our pro osed improvements would be a second floor to the subiect property.
therefo e, we are not using any additional land and the land or property is not
enough to put on a total of 60 parking stalls as required.
8. What sp cial circumstances or conditions apply to subject property which are
peculia to such property and do not apply generally to property in the neighbor-
hood?
Sublect property has ,an unimproved lot, 100 X 100. This we would develop into
a landscaped drained improved blacktop parking lot, whereas at present it is an
eyesore to the neighborhood and not used to its best advantage.
9. Present Zoning,p-1
10. Is the Variance requested the minimum Variance necessary to allow the reasonable
use of the property?
Yes. The proposed improvements and also the requested variance should be in harmony
with the development of the overall community in this area and not detrimental (Over)
11 . Will the granting of ,the requested Variance be in harmony with the development
of surrounding property and not injurious to the neighborhood or detrimental to
the public welfare?
See answer in #10
Signature of 6/. 16 0
Date /' / D7 Applicant VA(A I e_
APPLICATION TO: Buildingding Departmentartment 4-.Z.. -d,
Renton Municipal Buildi
SUBMIT
200. Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Telephone 235-2540
li Revised July, 1973)
10. whatsoever to any of the adjacent property owners.
AL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN UNINCORPORATED KING COUNTY OR IN CITY OF Renton
is 5 , 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 1, Wefancs Addition, according to the plat recorded
Volume 39 of Plats, page 21, in King County, Washington, except that portion
Lot 5 lying West of a line projecting due South from a point on North line of
id lot, 55 feet East from Northwest corner of said lot.
I
CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION
SITE APPROVAL
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
File No. SA-U,V7-// Filing Date
J / `,12/
Application Fe $ Receipt No . l g') ? VaL1t"G;_e_6/
Environmental eview Fee $
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 255-4400 Offilce
1. Name H. A. LENCOE and JANET BLENCOE Phone 255-7376 Home,
Address 112 Monterey Dr. NE, Renton, WA 98055
2 . Property location` 138, 200, & 206 3rd Place So. , Renton, WA 98055
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of Block 1, Wefancs Addition according to the plat recorded
in Volume 39 of Plats, page 21 in King County, Washington EXCEPT that portion of Lot 5
lying West of a line projecting due South from a point on the North line of said lot
55 feet Eat from the Northwest corner of said lot.
4 . Number of acres or square feet 30,800 square feet Present zoning 13-1
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? A 6,000 square foot,medical-
dental facility addition and to develop the parking lot on the west side with 30
new parking stalls to be drained, black topped, striped, fenced and landscaped.
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :':
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
Scale
existin structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 2,0 '
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . . . 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinit map (include land use and zoning
on adja ent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. BuildinF height and area (existing and proposed)
7 . LAND USE HEIRING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Ap eal Action
Re arks
11
l
Planning D,el5t.
Rev, 1-7Z 1
I ' r
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
MARCH 4 , 1981
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. :
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
PENDING BUSINESS:
NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY (AUSTIN COMPANY)
ECF-602-80; SA-092-80)
FRED BOWSER (ECF-642-80; R-135-80)
DAVE BEST (ECF-634-80; R-125-80)
FOR RECONSIDERATION:
HOMECRAFT LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. (ECF-013-81; SA-010-81)
NEW BUSINESS:
ECF-020-81 H. A. AND JANET BLENCOE
SA-017-81 Application for site approval to
V-019-81 allow expansion of medical/dental
facility through second floor
addition and application for variance
from Parking and Loading Ordinance
regarding parking requirements;
property located at 138, 200, and
206 South 3rd Place
ECF-624-80 CHARLES R. UNGER
SM-87-80 Application for Shoreline Manage-
ment Substantial Development Permit
to allow construction of 20 ' x 20 '
deck; property located at 371.7
Lake Washington Boulevard North
ECF-017-81 EMILIO AND RICHARD PIEROTTI
SP-013-81 Application for special permit to
fill 8+ acres with material from
PACCAR, which would consist of
dirt and iron scrap; property
located in the vicinity of 3315
Talbot Road South
ECF-019-81 DAVID G. WOODCOCK, JR.
R-015-81 Applications for rezone from R-2
to R-3 and special permit to
allow parking lot addition for
existing adjacent medical/dental
clinic; property located at 123
Pelly Avenue North
r.,____,
1 1
W.
ENV MENTAL R,,,E EW COMMITTEE 11
REGULA" MEETING 4 MARCH 4, 1981 ilt _ 1 i
I1 I IITYOFRENTO 1
r _
UNGER . ' '!,r --
9i EA .' t; (ECF-624
MAY `N
i,
1
11 . 11111
LAKE
r WAISH I NGTON .:
3
le
r
A yy7"J++JJ I441 I
1-
ii,MM. . liAgqrfi9 1rf-. ; ' I: L-4 Milliel. s'.1.'"F` '''''''')i.? .• . , I=
L... %, al a---r1 g I h ; 1
4 ram+ I Ww ;'
1 N,i 1'1 L,m `-i ; 11 .—r I x a'I
it, I •
r\k; , t1_,
w-.
ii TA—. r,[ .- AFT 01 —81 T
1-e\Lz= .r;N
ram_ k CEDAR RIVER J ! „.,, ,
t I
r' 'I - ,, '
R -, ,..-
pi!:,14:
1,,,10.
CK
y
6
CF'-019- I I
W k`
i ,
LACK
i
I
1 , IVER
e
i ` n
I,:OE (EC. 0 -8 1,
I.
I ._t_ ,`,: SPRINGBROOK k;;
CREEK 1 f.,.
K "1P%—,--
m._...._._..-i—
i\Ii. ,,I TAUS' lI
r‘
y
f`
l N, G ECF 1 6 02 0 r, e'
i1 Y
Tf
r,
1
a I
an , .• : 1_4_ 1111161
Ilk' ' ' 11 t—
17T. ImisiPu i 74 ;,. . a IERO
j
TII i `j' i rt1
r Iz)i CF-0- Z:
11111._,_,,, 1 ,.„ , ,___, LI :' il ‘ ' ; 1 t. t_'\
EST EC —63.4 ,810y_
y/ GREEN F (BOWS R (1 CF1=-6 2— 0)
RIVER I Lj r
tt` I '' l
1 t I
LAKE
I ( t 1 I
f
YOUNGS
OF RA,A
z THE CITY OF RENTONUto /co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
Z
0OMM BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT
o P March 5, 1981
235- 2550
94iTF0 SEP.1 .
H. A. and Janet Blencoe
112 Monterey Avenue N.E.
Renton, Washington 98055
RE: ECF-020-81 , SA-017-81 , V-019-81
Dear H. A. and Janet Blencoe:
The Environmental Review Committee at its meeting of March 4 , 1981 ,
did consider the above applications as it relates to the remodeling
and expansion of the medical building located on South Third Place.
It is the opinion of the Committee that it cannot issue a Declaration
of Non-Significance with the current significant discrepancy between
the number of parking spaces that are required for your proposal and
the number of parking spaces which you propose to develop. The
Committee recommends that you consider alternatives to the size of
the proposal, alternative locations for installation of parking,
leasing of adjoining property, or other design alternatives which
will more nearly meet our ordinance requirements.
Until such time as the Environmental Review Committee has sufficient
information to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance on your pro-
posal, no public hearing on the above applications will be possible.
The Committee recommends that you work with the Planning and Public
Works Departments and your own design consultants on solutions to
this problem.
Very truly your
David R. Clemens
Acting Planning Director
Richard Houghton
Acting Public Works Director
Ronald G. Nelson
Building Director
DRC :gh
OF RA,,
16 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
CJ ` 0 Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
1011 0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0 235- 2550
0194
rFD SEP1°*'
MEMORANDUM
May 2 % , 1981
TO : Files
FROM: Willis Roberts
Mrs . rlencoe came in this date and picked up a set of
their plans , indicating that they are resubmitting them
to th- architect for revision. She also indicated that
they ish that the application remain open.
wr
II
ENVIRONMENTALTALLu REVIEWIEW COMMIY JL JC E
SEPTEMBER 2, 1981
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. :
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
PENDING BUSINESS
1
RaMAC, INCORPORATED: (ECF-.061-81 )
RENTON PROPERTIES, INC: (ECF-075-81 ) - B-258
OLD BUSINESS
ECF-069-81 PICKLE, LYLE
SA-061-81 To consider revised plans : Application
for site approval to allow construction
of 188 dwelling unit condominium
to be known as Isle Lake Mountain
View in B-1 zone; property located
on the west side of Lincoln Avenue
N.E. south of N.E. 44th Street.
ECF-020-81 BLENCOE, H.A. AND JANET
SA-01 "(081 To consider. revised plans : Application
V-019-81 for site approval to allow expansion
of medical/dental facility through
second floor addition and application'
for variance from Parking and Loading,'
Ordinance regarding parking requirements;
property located at 138, 200, and
206 South 3rd Place.
NEW BUSINESS
ECF-07-81 CASS, BRUCE
B-260 Application for building permit
to construct professional office
building; property located on south
west corner of Rainier Avenue N.
and N.W. 3rd Place.
ECF-081-81
I
COUNTRY HILLS APARTMENTS
B-262 Application for variance from Sign
Ordinance to install sandblasted
cedar property identification sign
100 square feet) ; property located
at northwest corner of intersection
of Eagle Ridge Drive and Benson
Road.
ni i
IT
rENVIRONMENTALREVIEW
1
L a-
COMMITTEE I r
P.
1
iSEPTEMBER2, 1 981 IRee
1
PICKLE, LYLE I
1 1
limo is., , . _ I
la f ----t L.,
Inum t
I r• velks:
liNs• LAKE
Vir 4 ' \ Illa 11C 7- - IffarIata 14, ....WASHINGTON , Ars_ ,e . •- 1 mu Iii AM brig
st\N 1
3
iksiatultammiatcrl, __.
iii rig 'oboe. 1
AN r41.4;_itatilibra 46 IeitAraimuslintr
1ii 4%ifflool .1LEIlbPI" 11"1 igrAtillitml i IAA,IiiPlifl mu A. i_...
111.--4 i
Iret.41L7aibla -114 i ' n ii_. )...411
1 mug 1 vegmuLtriCASS, BRUCE V. Ignifilliri `di .-- •
IN I
N81111011
cI 141110 VW h [1 1 - - I I
it. c)\441111"%frz'abigiupp 6...41\ .----1 ' ....0 1inBLENCOE, N.A. AND JANET
I atrcil ,,. nil.gq t*,... 11Itoldi111hi ,
1161IMM .- 1 " •AWE P' ilh. 4,-. El I ri 1
1 ill V ---- -imippim III t-:-.-- - ' x-•1„.
4 ''' "Zt____,-
IA
1:
404ri' i
ir- _40.01„-raMdmit 1 is.
424,1"...
N...,,,ill COUNTRY HILLS APARTMENTS i111,........,....,
I PA1 • ir_o_i_ ?„,-.....1i
i
I II iii F- it wow
1 I j 4k. I
I
N+__ Irs•
1
1 Millarlarin& Ar AP '
1i Im 1- -----1i
0
gimirpga- rgi NT
III al soiIfIIIIIITiasim. i MINO li ..._...i r.
I ! 4' 1 -4
11 1 -171‘ hil A A
r, 1 P ii 1
Iei1
s 1 I 1 k
1
1- i
E I
4
1 -(1ir(
II YOUNGS
r ;i. I 1
1 I
liunnei1 , PS . E ANC.
SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS
P:O. BOX 1031 • PUYALLUP,WA 98371
PUY: 845-8833 SEA: 838-3474
I
August 25, 1981
f
Mr. Roger J. Blaylock
Associate Planner
City f Renton
Municipal Building
200 Mull Ave. South
Renton, Washington 98005
Re: Isle Lake Mountain View Condominiums 81-1903
Dear Mr. Blaylock:
This response is t'o your letter of August 6, 1981.
Item 1: The 'development of the site has a maximum of 200 units
and we propose to (place 188 units on the property in four buildings .
The buildings will be constructed of concrete and will be very fire
resistant. The site will be well landscaped and blended into the
naturab. surroundings. The portion to the South will have a large buffer
strip consisting oif the right-of-way which won't. be constricted for
vehicletraffic due to the excessive slope. The East portion of the
projec has two (2) abutting right-of-ways with a ditch area between
them a various points. The area to be developed is Lincoln Avenue
which 's the traveled roadway. The adjacent right-of-way to the site
is not opened and has a drainage course cutting through it. The
draina e area will' be a blend of natural and professional landscaping.
The ar a will be enhanced with additional evergreens. The trees will be
the type of which are common to the Padific Northwest. The landscaping
on the site will be a shown on the plans. The intensity of development
will enhance the existing site and surrounding community.
Item 2: The property adjacent to the proposal has natural barriers
to the East, West and South. The West has a dropoff of about 30 feet to
a lower plateau with industrial businesses. This type of use is compatible
with tie condominiums proposed. The southerly and easterly adjacent
right-Of-way are also natural buffers. The area to the east is elevated
above ¶he site and will not be damaged because of the natural vegetation.
A two story-stick development was laid out and the site was crowded with
100 units. As the height of the project increased, the ratio of open
space increased proportionately. The parking has a better layout and allows
50% to be covered. By using the building concept, the parking is covered
and there is a maximum of open space. Therefore, the adjacent property
is enhanced, rather than damaged.
I
1
Page 2 of 2
Item 3: The storm sewer construction will follow the natural
drainage pattern1which exists at the freeway. We have made a complete
analysis of the May Creek Basin in this area and the contributing land.
The city has approved our design for filling the property down stream
at the outfall. We will design the on-site system with 100% retention 1
and require oil-water seperators at 'the outfalls. 'The offset storm
water will take its natural course along the easterly property line.
The driveways to the project will have culverts large enough to handle
a 100 year flood.] All engineering will be examined and approved by the
City of Renton Engineer.
Item 4: The, utilities will be installed at the developers expense.
Water will be extended to the North and intersect with the existing main.
This ,rocedure will create a loop system and increase the reliability for
fire flow. An adequate number of fire hydrants will be placed stra-
tegicilly on the site. The guard on the gate at night will help enchance
the police protection. The method of landscaping will not allow the
project to be a throughfare. Therefore, a minimum of problems are expected
from the residents.
1
Item 5: Theiexisting homes in the area will notice little view
blockge because the natural vegetation has already made a barrier which
will donceal the new buildings. The property to the east has a continous
slope up for the proposed project, this slope gives the existing residents
a dis inct advantage in keeping their view.
Cordially,
ilei‘.--'/-- /‘-/-1 --7#
Robert A. Bennett, PLS
Project Manager
RAB/kd.
Isle Lake Mountain View Condominiums
Pickle, Lyle'
il 6\ P., li! 1 JI °+l V e aa,) 1 111 d o v Z iy$
y y765t sY NE r
r
M. C'
and vicinity
a a.,.
p Ny45t
W- '
I
T• : y
z
ri v 2 NI
A Land of Destiny O Map Q
ro` o
S 104 Str,' Po Y NE 20 S,
W
N,
3 niche,•9 mda RL d _ a" .c.
rA
Copyright 1981--All Rights Reserved 9
wz u
w
bc.ele--APP•o.. P6• C.. 6 Z Z l0 S
l
4aa Produced by40 : . Fronts A. Wilber--Auburn, Washington
o
a^.
Z = c 4
tTt
3000 y•
Iiilijo
WAShINGTON
c.
y S 112 St _ _ ::, 'N!
@.
s'rs••,: S t'w
S LirniL{n t
e M.1 1 P
b
F
t
vord
ct L4 < <<MUM,'
q .lUa ..St E
i
4 a
O,•
a-i
Sl7 rrt S
r u,,, • a7••i+naN', .., ti'115 - ..e...n w a "Jran.-
to N w KA a •M
C®.O'- J n
I ..
r+.. S i - ,C. ,..Q '115
4\
SI1,$1_6 St c t
a a -.•••. PL , S116 St m1i 1:f , . 1...
N« N oo..
1G/LSp ZNI b):t d'S116St$ 16StLans ^ ,,stPlG --• '
A '
8 1474en.
1ra' 117St
r AIRCRAFT
17 yrv•.
s s1t0s, 118St •.._
tVIM*:
111/10311 mQ, 113
s it ?. , .
to
C 119 Sl aw
H,
SKY AY '
al
Ci2 '
S c, 1 .O I•
OS
NOS,•
J
mn.,. S 120 S, v170 St S at yWv
tl t
IN USTRIAL AREASPe4KJ' S120' St rn
t •
y`f/,+ Jl.r... t a'
c I
ra rii p,A. ••"
c 1 e • g• N
1 -
A• N11
INDUSTRIAL:
i , ` y
I 1 S. I.
G. `' " ro o St o , t I
123'Pl'-' ca'o'zi.s. i :'.
u• J 'E i CI • \
r.' y S 174 SI n.) cu 17®St S 12'Fa -.7
IV- NGSI
1245,1
Ica
NW 6SL t• 1 iei tS175Stq. S`.
gt
v., ...
I 26 S 125 St '
e- NW +,
N
Rr.JTOrr' 1
a N,
x SI
v t?bPL S ci '- b- 1
I t\ Pd
4 .. s o. - *. ' J
s,1 5 Stl Municloal
Z.4 tpir
a 4,vim c;v' ,1 .._S .
c iLr
r ,,,
fIAIRPORTI yr
5
a
dq ©it'. 0'° 'r"
NttS177PLr- \71 m.l[• c St 6 How•
S I<y S 12E St .' z' ' a 5t'
a,
q s v •a
S•t7`a', .. e IF 51295r a n,l 6. 'Y, . .y ..0 < "IP, 4f•-•Y -
K„7,
r
e
o
ai.pi nfo 6
Y
V. c
d /1
1 'y"
n 01.130 St N c ;. (\/f t r F
r"
4,'p 30. off St Rd ... . <
q'
I.. ..,....,9r,v:
c
w°-
r-« ! - t e
S 13t 1
a . . ..
ao. »3'.11
c
N
n:\Air oon WV,' .......
limagy
1 ' a
o ••` 375r L131 C, "132 St '- ^.
W 2 PL ., -. __= INS c,,.. >•! ,..4"
Js,
jinni74Srri
n10 a
c d t/
I' \
Black Rlvel`" Jv ,,. Vrnor7 fr h' .
Duwe S • ' 'y
S st S l f 1
u .
mirA P. E3 e y•ta ? a%c''
r L,., * SW a. i'S 3 St Cad.
Stan
v'"
r: PL
tsp
llEi® !k i6 I` sass
St
r\
Tukwila 6m•c C •S. 1
a.
qwillE
9 S l4iSt `,•` q y •• V • .M y) •
w ;
5t
v ..,
51 •?pi_ ^Si 3S',
Gollf Course 0 ' is 7 0 ,St /'t 1751 6
to C T
H .
1 IN y a ' ,
A
3 r,
O' - .1--. •,'.-N
Si• I
C
12. 5t
v 147 St
1tn
t 'COUNTY
C Q C Ecyn7ronrc', Gro i S r
1-•,,
G. a E Inauand c.• • Si
t} f, S _. •Y.i.'+
n o .0 AreS J - tr( i r1st49SlitE'i PeRz •\C'. •Z°a SN 1 % '
0/46 p n,e.vL,l". U ryCont
7, fib, '"«,«,-Wm St9/1 ,/ 2` •
W Hi 11 s
s.. Thunder tmJti: f' ssss`t- tio
SW 16 St
a i f
F
1 1 ---I u se 1•PI,t c
N S 154 St, t,' ,.
f __ _
I ._.
rt A' .1.n• Q Lb 10 .. 1 11. 7 Cl Ef i19CrI /-1 C I 5 17 5.
daIhCln!. < I'! • [
1
M
la 5 l C WV M+^ C «O C1 er +$ 6 y
77::' sW t9 St 1 •i r ."°q
a 1
gl -I l.orwacro tl t,
I",.
o.t3 , •+ '
oc
Hotta tPar4wavk.g 15®51;k.
Reaoo
r
E•,an Bieck 1 'Iti
v
y\•J
o 5 TWileAriL
S CITY'VI v1L
SOUtrtCt NTER
rd•
1 t 523. Sr ...7P 61 .. 'rp 167;I< S
i
p 6
gyp,
N .q. t'
Baker Blvd x1::.. rpw r o )•',u n
sno....ING MALL am
ppy QV N
1 a .l w
r , ',. :
1 6St o ar ^sf SE 164 Sty
Str°nder Blvd I'1: . .I i7 Pt 't. 'a, a ice• GE 166 I' Q N
f
i
v..w. .1
s l IN,. v c ' o.,' E.
ar A.. v r_.s SE 166 St n
Tree Inclusive ,/J,{ en r a.!`,:'3''
a .S 5°$, g:
a
t le /._•V 6 s , 7tt.,'nCt 7' SF 1G8 St
PARKWAY ' i 4 p t y • r,
PLAZA t d t
ti. % ^
a 4 s cr
Sr
a _ 1
TUKWILA , I au
m
M at t SE 170 St t70 S,
iNORNI
a SH 1 >, r u e
1
zzo : C; sw3rS1
m
ie
d
m
a g.
v +
a SF 7?S
I M,nk Fer Blvd s4: ::.4*•r:4-:•,44:•L:Gse!':r.::::• A.
1 • 11
zo_osTz.oie:?o_ --.LA N.).2.-_-_:
to 0 0
reA,-. ‘'A' • ., i''' 4:';:-.,- l'k -I _
4 _
I
00,--
5 X10- ../Afjf-)3./.-ASTL- __L-. DAr.-e-: •--Si6 kJ4. - I1,4!,." . •
411'-% '`.'," - Xj-,.'-% '..
4---,0,-1-
15/1=a FA e4f---t': -0.0kfmt4 L-1) 17ALic..ca )1,.• _ -.4. , ;, - t :i.. i 1 ex, :,-, s ..t..„
map,.13 - .P.1:_—_:::: .•
LL=......__________75
11,I
I 1 1
I
I
ri....._.........
sec:
11.=••••
MIMS. ••••••0 Nei....0
70
sae, .,:r ...goo...e....me. ••..e.......q s• ma .....ea.... ... •••=••• .., :a• ommap ••••.. mem
i_r_ _. ..,_i .
I
1
11 I
1
II -.zexGq.Kio_.'L4MINATe0i.CE-PAric—II
1. •II
I5 IIIII • . I 1
1II
I Ik . I • I I II I 1
I 1 11
1 I I I 1
I I i
1 1 II I I 1
1. .1 i i
1 I I I I i
I I 1
I 1 I 1 .. I I
I , A i I-- I - - - I- e -- - --1
eI- -: I - I i 1
as ....es . 1:m ....... • •••••• .o.... .•••m• ..•. • •••••••.. . ."... ......
e . ,
6/LOE_
1 1
r _ L.> e_C
71
771L—
A
4.' _E C=
r, ram 06E:DOVE—
I '
1
c
Country Hills Apartments
II
s! =
1,
9y$ -
git95 ._ -
t-
lc( '`
011c-
3L`
RC7l
13J,
NO?
A‘ .
E3.,
53 ,
41'
c
B
7.
I9(
0_.
ram --'
I-
1
41of
j
9x
1
m
fi
t
ao
4
7
is®
t
r®
a1I•
i
I
9
I
IQ
w
I
i
F
4
ctT4
t3
Aot?
il'
1-
4A1
ii
c*
7;
a'
fl
I
x
1
M
ei:
o
I
7-
1---\
1 '
U
c.
r,r_my.,..„,m4,,,T,F„.T.2.y...gzeia-,f,,,,%=',45' ..s-.476.:6.7,7. 1,-.:... ..4-,,,,,.._..,..,,,,-,----,.-.,..:,:,.s,.....• -.• .
1110 1
I
I
2 1
1
1
i
1
i .
NI 1
0
F-
I
i>mmi
lirir—A—,
i-
sr-.. ...1-
4\
1
J
4,
Or
Air,
4.1
1
1 @ 1041frr •
3 ,
r-1- '•- . • --..
4.
40
v.- -- . . •
4.-#.
t•
4,*
1 .
1, ,
1
C.121 1
4..r.'"
A
i
i`JO ' i ,
1
7
z• I
1 t
11 ,
I
1 1
I
1
I
I
Country Hills Apartments
Date c_rculated : l /, 8® Comments due : 3/ yygi ,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIE;,r, SHEET
e
ECF -- oac. -
APPLIC TION No (s )'1. SA-6/7— el ar 1/°--0/9 -8/
PROPONENT : if 8kiIc /J AZ 'ncoe
PROJECT TITLE : t'a-A-000,0 o g i11, 4M#CC
Brief Description' •of Project : eavoSer, f 70e0at.S3^veta. it- g®6046oteheirp,..
ot.ea(447011,0_41@k at1 d Y'ea./ cf4 e4 eoeiest N'• r 'iee les rJoe rep',1,4iy.IS°,,
LOCATION : 1.7g 66f e 0a -s. e°®
s gz /S
SITE AREA : BUILDING AREA (gross )
I
DEVELOP ENTAL COVERAGE (%) : - -
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) To ographic changes :
V
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 1/
3 ) Water & water courses :
4
4 ) Plant life : j Ir.:,..-**
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Lan Use ; north : a-V G..a,,,,, ,,,,, - c' .( 0 e s
east': /l(i,.L
south : 6*01dp, /(
1(- --west : 1i 1.PeiretOpt4 P ,.4,'e
1,
Lan use conflicts : View obstruction :
9 ) Nat ral resources :
10 ) Ris of upset :I
1
11 ) Poplation/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwelllings : 1
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : SOa iltiowox( 4r'PsMay (75//000 x6,Ooa4S)
traffic impacts : Al // /1 'P rirt. g90 r,tw,srr
14 ) Public services :
ov . `
ve o7's-
15 ) Energy : I
3•=/P/.
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Huma-i health : j
18 ) Aesthetics : v
19 ) Recr4ation :
1
k//
20 ) Archology/hisory : v I
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI
77.
DOS More InFormation_
Reviewed by : ,. si.< l tL' bi 1 itle : ASS,, t-p4 I, eV—
Date : 3111.81
FORM: ERC-06
1
Date car ulated : 312/8/ • Comments due : 3 3 ,g/
1
EN6VI68®rn1ENT81L CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF -
1
APPLICAT ON No (s ) . 1S#9-0/7- g/ S /4-Ng? /
PROPONENT : #A ,6Ap9ce•ftb 7;NS7L itgArteceo
PROJECT TITLE : <SiTo'/j-/1400,%4L 1 aje,00/M/CE`
Brief Description
off
Project : #0,00s c [ /0 eon Siru / u.c ±40004'o q „ji
Alit/14'o"a o , is/e het(!4ed..aA6c4••4`4!:nPp&'esf` r r n'a.ce r-0 rJucP re eP ,y.IS riAN
60siiaLlls Yo
LOCATION : 139 Roe)/ o?O( S. 3cd 4`0sAe//s
SITE AREA : 3o doe 0' BUILDING AREA (gross) ---
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : --
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) DireFt/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses : X
4) Plan life :
5 ) Anim 1 life :
6) Noisa :
7) Ligh & glare : ; X
1
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
I
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :i —e
View obstructioln : 6- -z..e
9 ) Natu al resourc'es :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Popu ation/Employment :
12 ) Numbor of Dwellings : X 1
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traf is impacts :
14 ) Public services : X
15 ) Energy : V
16 ) Utilities :Y
17 ) Human health : X
18 ) Aesthetics : X
19 ) Recreation : X-
20 ) Archeology/history : y
COMMENTS :
Recommenda ion : SI___£
gTle :
DOS More Information_
ex).Reviewed b : e 6.-- ji 1h/P‘
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
a
Date circulated : , ',5, 8/ Comments due : 4.328/
EFH1 1UI98®NMENITAL CHECKLIST REWIEU SHEET
E C F - 0010 - 'Rif
APPLICATION No (s ) , 5 -®/7- P/ Z I.4-0/ -8/
r
PR0PON N T :ekiveC ZzAtee teknC0eD
PROJEC TITLE : r AIVA204.014. .9:g /4A/C6—
Brief Cescription' of Project : 00 0,502. /o, s vee
Adeliill' ii 10 * osi ed uet d a7'aMene4' (v epee(4 ran)kv,p1 ee 6) vduee ref p(-61,,.Ic
LOCATION : 13g, ROO, ,goa S,
s ®®s
SITE AREA : -- -Cr ®® BUILDING AREA (gross ) ---
DEVELOP ENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
1
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) To ographic changes :
2 ) Dit•ect/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
1
5 ) An ' mal life : I
6 ) Nose :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; norlth :
east :
south :
I
west :
Lan . use conflicts :
View obstruction :
I
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :)
11 ) Pop lation/Employment :
12 ) Num.er of Dwellings :
13 ) Trim ends ( ITO : xxxxxxx •
tra fic impactlis :
T14 ) Public serviceis : I xxxx
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities : • I
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesttietics :
19 ) Recration :
20 ) Archeology/history : 1
COMMENTS :
Need more information.
Recommend. tion : DNS,I DOS More Information xxxx
Reviewed •. y : ersson title :
Date :3
FORM: ERC-06
I
Date circulated :
l,
Comments due : , I .ri/ki
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - / 45 - IR/ I
i
APPLICATION No (s ) . .5/9 --0/ -7- ,9/ R 1-4- 0/9 -8/
PROPONENT :R/si bie't izekCoitr r)
1
sPROJECTTITLE :0-; 1)A4,40PAL if.®,44/4 C6-
1
Brief Cescription' of Project : l001tld.ceI
Q 4 pvt eked-Ada %cd' Al` e f,e r doe e'er . .
LOCATI N : 60sAtilslcc
SITE AREA : t 3®
1, 8p®4' BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOP ENTAL COVERAGE (%) : —
1
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) To ographic changes :
2 ) Di ect/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Pl . nt life : 1
5 ) An ' mal life :
6 ) Noise : li'
a
7 ) Light & glare!:
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
I
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
r
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset
11 ) Poptlation/Employment :
12 ) Num er of Dwellings : I
13 ) Tri ends ( ITE') : 9 j..; ids 77e E-
l
traffic impactls :
L "ny_
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy : 4-------
16 ) Utilities : l
17 ) Human health : j i/
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation : ! 1/
20 ) Arch ology/hisory :
COMMENTS : 1
1
I
Recommend• tion : DNSIv DOS More Information_
Reviewed y : // ' 7 J 1 itle : La&c S -- -74 is
Date :
I
FORM: ERC-06
ii
Date c ' rculated : ', ,. /
F
1 Comments due : 3 / 30Z/
ENVIRONMENTAL(JJIAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - ke) -zsi
APPLICATION No (s ) , 6/9-6/ 7- gf s .A®/ °'
a, ,/
PROPONENT : #4 &en Coto,4. PIe t kne043'
I
PROJEC TITLE : s5 -t , - , 0, Prde.V0/9,04/C6—
Brief escription, of Project :J9'0 ®gal ife,eon Sfru a_ g®t,®°o
t11A ez 0 wefir eq1 ra/*cat 4 'yo rtheerefti
LOCATIO : f, , e®d coi S. 45 1s c
5e®s /®s4.
SITE AR A : -- -01, 90c BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOP1ENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO'
1 ) Tolographic changes : r i.
2 ) Di ect/Indirect air quality : V
3 ) Wa er & water courses :
4 ) P1 _ nt life :
5 ) Animal life : ; I/
6 ) Noise : I
7) Light & glares:
8 ) Land Use ; norlth :
1 I
east :
south :
west :
Lan use conflicts :
Vie obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
Y
1/
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Pop lation/Employment : 1/
12 ) Num er of Dwellings :
13 ) Trio ends ( ITE ) :
tra fic impactls :
14 ) Public services :V
1
15 ) Energy :
a
V
16 ) Utilities : I i/
17 ) Huma health : V
18 ) Aest etics : i/
19 ) Recr- ation :
i
20 ) Archeology/hisory :l/
11 COMMENTS :
I
I
I
Recomment tion : DNSIJ)( DOS More Information__
t)S.;- (Reviewed y : title :
Dater . ?ZA/
1 I_
FORM: ERC-06
i
Date circulated :Zig/ Comments due :__.3427 L
E( lI9 I:f fr E JTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEGJ SHEET
I
ECF - 0r. - ' / ;
APPLICATION No (s ) o 5/9-49l7- g/ s 44- 0 9 -8/
PROPONENT : kvo e7 &erneoP
PROJEC TITLE : %5;1 "0/4,444 +, G/ /4 C -
Brief escription of Project : y/0st, peons/o/c- ..
74.4,060° Reil®dst-
i gyp' h°I'0 at saa adieet</co./PA/'CV cefa
c .,
C peps ' 1r brewteanvice 1z 'Voce rev c ' c +,6 w
LOCATI N : 60sAilsYe
SITE AR A : — ..1k 947 BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOP ENTAL COVERAGE
I
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Toiographic changes :
2 ) Di ect/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Wa er & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) An ' mal life :;
6 ) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; norl,th :
east :
south :
west :
Lan . use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset
11 ) Population/Employment :
I.
12 ) Num er of Dwel lings :
s
13 ) Tri ends ( ITE ) :
tra fic impactlls :
14 ) Public servicels :ti/
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
I
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aest etics :
19 ) Recr ation :
20 ) Arch ology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommend• tion : I SI DOS More Information
OkiReviewedb
Date : 5/101
FORM: ERC-06
I
i
Date circulated :81 Comments due : r/g/
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 0 - / 1
APPLICATION No (s )
1'. 5,-0 /7- '/ S f/—®/g_s®
PROPONENT : jort t1.. P n 74 /,nr,p
i
PROJECT TITLE : f 0.- A40// X A CC
Brief Description of Project : eto s.a.
c.
6 lehoes"
t d'olfa 4 mehe' 4'1-41e449 1 Cel11
r/
1 411 e/i, rjoce, i iy.
LOCATIO` : J.7S/ ROO (gOC S.
90.ss effs114 e
sue/®
SITE AR A : ® 3 ®454' BUILDING AREA (gross ) ---
DEVELOP 1ENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ®-
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Tosographic changes :
quality :
2 ) Di ect/Indirect airY
3 ) Wa er & water' courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life : 7
6 ) Noise : 17,-
7 ) Light & glarel:
8 ) Lan Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Lan use conflicts :
VielL obstruction :
9 ) Natural resouces :
T
I 10 ) Risk of upset
11 ) Population/Emp,loyment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
V
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
v
1
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :_
11
17 ) Humai health : ,f1P
18 ) Aestietics :
1/
7
19) Recreation :
v°
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
I
Recommenda : on : DOS More Information
Reviewed : 1 itle :_ AL SaLEDate : 1
FORM: ERC-06
I
ENVIROMMENTAL VIEW COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 9 , 1981
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. :
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
PENDING BUSINESS
RaMac , INCORPORATED: (ECF-061-81 )
RENTON PROPERTIES, INC. : (ECF-075-81 ) - B258
SEA-PORT DOZING, INC. : (ECF-587-80) - B-236
MOBIL OIL COMPANY
OLD BUSINESS
ECF-020-81 BLENCOE, H.A. AND JANET
SA-017-81 To consider revised plans : Application
V-019-81 for site approval to allow expansion
of medical/dental facility through
second floor addition and application
for variance from Parking and Loading
Ordinance regarding parking requirements;
property located at 138, 200, and
206 South 3rd Place.
PP-056-81 EARLINGTON PARK PLAT AMENDMENT
Request for the elimination or adjustment
of the cul de sac as existing on
the preliminary plat; property located
at S.W. 7th Avenue and Powell Avenue
S.W.
ECF-082-81 CITY OF RENTON
ZONING ORDINANCE REVISION
Churches in R-3 and R-4 Zones.
NEW BUSINESS
ECF-079-81 CLARK-RICH, INC.
B-263 Application to construct an 8-unit
apartment building (Maple Valley
Heights - Short Plat 033-81 , Parcel
2; property located at Pierce Avenue
S.E. and S.E. 6th Street.
ECF-080-81 CLARK-RICH, INC.
B-264 Application to construct an 8-unit
apartment building (Maple Valley
Heights - Short Plat 033-81 , Parcel
3; property located at Pierce Avenue
S.E. and S.E. 6th Street.
ECF-078-81 STIRSKEY HOLDINGS, LTD.
B-261 Application to construct a three
story residential building containing
15, one bedroom condominium units
12th Avenue Condominiums) ; property
located south of 12th Street between
Harrington Avenue N.E. and Harrington
Place N.E.
la DI
It ism 1 1
1
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW I 111111111081‘1
I 1COMMITTEE
k ist I tSEPTEMBER9 , 1981
Ea I
i StA 1ii16h i
H, tr
Al lik
ALI . emi I 1mil
quo! 1,,1
1
I MIIIII 1 t
L.
al i 011.
1 .,,, witiiiik,
LAKE 41, J ir- /
1
WASHINGTON \
r t P iiito.tk&N,
AC Vie lik •
IIIIi ill 1111 •-,•-•- '' '"+. 1
ii I IP'14 mum - \'‘,
A il. HOLDINGS, LTD.
I I
i nor=h, ,,,,...itat rillok A mAt um,i4 h
4 .1=
iiiWisq. El Ktk _ ....._: .Mui 41% cce. r 1111 taillaillitgliat
laillib 1 II 1" 11 "t418111011M
I i'
1
Allft... 1
111111
I ,
166. . mifftii-KOANIM:AM h. MIMI I AihOSURINE1 - ‘-litairMALOWA.. • 1 II:1 VIIIIIIII7/ ' 4_1 1111 lit
lijmallillill m rag IR
s/MT% d
Li II4141111411.114111iii"-'44111141indlidDillitirii
1- ---
7
I f3LENCOE, H.A. AND JANET A'..!•1 .yin il e
1 ... li --7-, 1-;enitn, k
L___.1 .
1b.- 6-Tr.b.' lp : ..
EARLING PARK PLAT AMENDMENT . ',,:'1 bf:mittgallt AL fri--i
1
Instr::4,CLARK-RIC C. Parce1-42 & #3L
I ‘, 1 11P1-------- 47,-- 7---
I roSIP-1,
4.„0.101-'111trAilliii 4P , - , 1
lifilik'61visillar NI ' 1, 1111
Aral_ilri IS ill I
qIELii , "Tir III1 umi_imiimrig1,,,, .„ ,
0 rsioximm=1101.1a n. IF APPA
m.. --,„ „:-.ma- lar ,
2
1
I 41 i 11-‘1% mirarnoAlb
1111r11117-
i
I .
i ell11111; -- (1
rt L
4 rli 1 i I
bIjr
H
1 I01
c C I
1Jr-
T----
p, — 1 ‘...' - , yLoAuKNEesIIPi
I
I i
I
1
I
r_-
I
I I
C
HOLVICK deREGT KOER.ING
August 26, 1981
I l
Mr. Roger BlaylockPlanningDeartment
City of Renton
200 MilI Avenue
Renton, Washington 93055
Re : Preliminary Plat - File No. PP 056-80
Earlington Park - BRH II 81079
Dear Mr. Blaylock:
The developer of the Earlington Park, Holvick deRegt and
Koering is requesting that the environmental review committee
consider the elimination or adjustment of the cul de sac as
existing on the preliminary plat. Drawings of the alternatives
available have been provided for the committees review .
It is the Lleveloperls opinion that the overall project would
benefit by the elimination or adjustment of the cul de sac as
shown on the preliminary plat in light of the following
information :
Legal access to the back lot is no longer required via the
cul de sac but is providedthrough the extension of Powell
Avenue .
o Traffic across the rail spur could be avoided .
o A four way intersection at S.W. 7th Avenue and Thomas Street
would also be avoided .
o The developer could make better utilization of the lot on
which the cul de sac is planned.
ONE OAKMEAD TERRACE•1230 OAKMEAD PARKWAY,SUITE 210•SUNNYVALE,CALIFORNIA 94086•(408)736-8533
Y
t.
Roger Blaylock
August 26, 1981
Page 2-
II
A response from the environmental review committee would be
appreciated.
Thank you for your reevaluation of this matter and should you
require any further information, please feel free to contact
Dave Michaelis or myself .
Sincerely,
Mike Selman
Holvick deRegt & Koering
MS/ lat
II
I
LAW OFFICES
WARD L.SAX
SAX
L.RUDDY
CLYDE H.MAcIVER AND MACIVER PHILIP E.CUTLER
JAMES L.MAGEE JAMES P.DONOHUE
D.GORDON WILLHITE 1900 PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MAUREEN E.RYAN
JOHN C.COART I MICHAEL R.GARNER
ALAN H.KANE
1415 FIFTH AVENUE JOHN R.RUHL
JOHN L.PATTERSON SEATTLE,WASHIN GTON 98171
ERIC F.IVERSON
HOWARD C.LINCO IN GAIL P.RUNNFELDT
DONALD K.FRANK LJIN THOMAS D.PRICE,JR.
ROGER W.JONES,JR.TELEPHONE:206-344-2160 KAY E.BONDEHAGEN
DANIEL M.CAINE
TELECOPIER:206-344-7839 MICHAEL C.ANDERSON
OF COUNSEL
August 26, 19 81 STEPHENTHOMASH•C..KEBRIDEKELLY,P.S•
Mr. Roger Blaylock
Renton Planning Department
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: Clearing of Property by Mobil Oil Corporation
Dear
M7.
Blaylock:
As we discussed on Monday, I represent Mobil Oil
Corporation which wishes to clear a portion of its property
adjacent to its existing bulk storage facility. Specifically,
we wish to clear a strip which runs on a north/south axis
from what is commonly referred to as Strander Boulevard on
the south and the existing roadway on the north which strip
would be 60 feet wide. The east side would be the existing
fence line and the west line 60 feet out from that. In
reviewing the building regulations of the City of Renton, I
find no requirement that a permit be obtained to undertake
such clearing; however, I am concerned that this parcel may
be within a greenbelt.
Would you please review the applicable regulations of
the City of Renton and advise whether a permit is indeed
required. As I tjnentioned, the reason for this clearing is
in anticipation of filling a portion of this area for the
installation of a fire line to make a loop between Lynn
Avenue and Strander Boulevard. In addition, access would be
provided along the west side of the Mobil. facility. Mr.
Robert , the District Engineer for Mobil has been in touch
with the Fire Marshal who is in favor of the proposal. Be
that as it may, it is my understanding that at the present
time, there is a moratorium on all filling in this area.
Thanking you in advance for your prompt response,
Sincerely yours,
AI..-Cte
St hen C. Kel
SCK: sll
cc: Mobil Oil Corporation
n 1,•
7429. 980. 002 I
I
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No (s) : SA-01 7-81 , V-019-81
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-020-81
Description of Proposal: Request for site
approval to allow
expansion of medical/dental
facility thru second ,
floor addition and
variance to reduce
required parking
from 60 stalls to
50 stalls.
Proponent : BLENCOE, H.A. and
JANET
Location of Proposal:138 , 200, 206 S.
3rd Place
Lead Agency: Planning Department
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 4 , 1981 and
September 9, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock
of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted
from: Richard Houghton, David Clemens, Ronald Nelson, Don
Persson, Roger Blaylock, Gary Norris, Steve Munson and James
Matthew
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-020-81 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
Steve Munson DATED: March 4 , 1981
2) Applications: SA-017-71 , V-019-81
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance:
Planning Department, Building Department, Fire Department,
Utilities Engineering Division, Engineering Department
and Traffic Engineering Department.
More information:. Police Department
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this development does not have significant adverse impact
on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW
43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by
the lea agency of a complete environmental checklist and
other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significence:
Will no- adversely affect adjacent properties
Signatures :
47teic9,-( J/Jg
Alo nal'd Nelson id R. Clemens, Acting
Building.Director Planning Director
R ' rhard C. Houghton, ing
Public Works Director
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final
declaration of non-significance for the following projects :
1 . BLENCOE, H.A. AND JANET (ECF-020-81 )
To consider revised plans : Application for site
approval to allow expansion of medical/dental facility
through second floor addition, file SA-017-81 ,
and application for variance from Parking and Loading
Ordinance regarding parking requirements, file
V-019-81 ; property located at 138, 200, and 206
South 3rd Place.
2. STIRSKEY HOLDINGS, LTD. (ECF-078-81 )
Application to construct a three story residential
building containing 15 one-bedroom condominium
units (12th Avenue Condominiums) , file B-261 ; property
located south of 12th Street between Harrington
Avenue N.E. and Harrington Place N.E.
3. CITY OF RENTON (ECF-082-81 )
Zoning Ordinance Revision; To permit churches in
R-3 and R-4 zones.
Further information regarding this action is available in
the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington,
235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the
Hearing Examiner by September 28 , 1981 .
Published: September 14 , 1981
i•--
Y r f
I 4:;. R .:41-10 : .
F
PROPOSE® ACTION REVI SED PLANS. . APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL APPROVAL
TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF MEDICAL/DENTAL FACILITY THROUGH SECOND FLOOR
ADDITION & VARIANCE RE PARKING REQUIREMENTS (ECF-020-81) SA-017-81/V-010-
GENEFiAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
138, 00 AND 20G SQUTH 3RD PLACE
P®STE® NO TIFYOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE C E.R.C. ] HAS DETE -;,< INED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION, ®DOES ! .DES NOT HAVE
A SIGNIFICANT A iVERSE- IMPACT ON THE ENVIRON-
MENT.,
A .. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, DWILL
i of ILL NOT, BE REQUIRED.
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:90 P.M.,SEPTEMBER 28, 1981
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
235-255C1
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
OF R
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
oBARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
vo co- 235- 2550
AlTFC SEP-N
P
SEPTEMBER 25 , 1981
H.A. and Janet Blencoe
112 Monterey Drive N.E.
Renton, Washington 98056
Re: Applications for site approval in P-1 zone to allow
expansion of medical/dental facility through second floor
addition and variance from Parking and Loading Ordinance
regarding parking requirements; property located at 138 ,
200 and 206 South 3rd Place.
Gentlemen:
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on September 9 , 1981 . A public hearing
before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for
October 13 , 1981 at 9 :00 a.m.
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present.
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing.
If you have any further questions, please call the Renton
Planning Department, 235-2550..
Very truly yours ,
92v4
Roger J. Blaylock
Associate Planner
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING
EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON October 13 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00
A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
1 . BLENCOE, H.A. AND JANET
Applications for site approval in P-1 zone to allow
expansion of medical/dental facility through second
floor addition, file SA-017-81 , and variance from
Parking and Loading Ordinance regarding parking
requirements , file V-018-81 ; property located at
138 , 200 and 206 South 3rd Place.
2 . SUPERSTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LTD.
Application for site approval in B-1 zone to construct
30-unit housing project for City of Renton Housing
Authority, file SA-066-81 ; property located in
the vicinity of 2821 N.E. 4th Street.
3 . PICKERING, DRURY
Application for three-lot short plat approval (Pick ' s
No. 2) , file 076-81 ; property located in the vicinity
of 421 Union Avenue N.E.
Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in
the Renton Planning Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE
PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 13 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00
A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
PUBLISHED: September 28, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS
ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I , STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE
ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to
before me, a Notary Public , in
and for the State of Washington
residing in King County, on the
25 day of September, 1981 .
119-LLia'"r SIGNED:
S PROPERTY
I
y
GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS
138, 200 AND 206 SOUTH 3RD PLACE >>',--
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Y:;. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF
A PUBLIC HEARING
TO BE HELD
IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
ON. OCTOBER '13, 1981 BEGINNING AT s:oo A. :.
fyy CONCERNING ITEM [i(
REZONE
0 SPECIAL PERMIT . .,
SITEAPPROVAL- EXPANSION OF MEDICAL/DENTAL FACILITY = •
WAIVEREl
FILE-SA-017-81
l
p HORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT .
VARIANCE FROM PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE.RE.. PARKING REQUI EMENTS
FILE V-018-61
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AU •' TiON
I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIM1NARY 4 PORT TO rug: HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
OCTOBER 13, 1981
APPLICANT: BLENCOE, H.A./BLENCOE, JANET
FILE NUMB R: • SA-017-81 , V-019-81
A. 'AimirgrAmY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The pplicant requests Site Approval for a +6000 square
foot second floor addition to an existing medical-dental
facility and a Variance to reduce the required...parking
from to stalls to 48 stalls.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION;ATION
1 . Owner of Record: H.A. Blencoe/Janet
Blencoe
2. Applicant: H.A. Blencoe/Janet
Blencoe
3. Location:
Vicinity Map Attached) 138, 200, 206 S.
3rd Place.
4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal
description is available
on file in the Renton
Planning Department.
5. Size of Property: 30,800 sugare feet
6. -Access: Via S. 3rd Place
7. Existing Zoning: P-1 , Public Use District
8._ Existing Zoning in the Area: P-1 ; B-1 , Business
Use
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial
10. Notification: The applicant was
notified in writing
of the hearing date. Notice
was properly published in
the Daily Record Chronicle
on September 28,.
1981 and posted in
three places on or
near the site as
required by City
Ordinance on September
25, 1981 .
C. s:]CSTORYP• GROUND :
The subject site was -annexed into the City by Ordinance
1322 of September 21 , 1948 at which time the present
zoning classification was applied.
PRELIMINARY REP;--"' TO THE HEARING EXAMINER" h
BLENCOE, H.A.%B__ ICOE, JANET
OCTOBER 13, 1981
PAGE TWO
D. AcimI;•IL n'
1 . Topography: The site is essentially. level.
2. Soils : Urban Land (Ur) is soil that has been modified
by disturbance of thenatural layers with additions
of fill material several feet thick to accommodate
large industrial and housing installations. The
erosion hazard is slight to moderate.
3. Vegetation: Lawn grass is the dominant feature
with a scattering of evergreen and deciduous trees.
4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides suitable
habitat for birds and small mammals.
5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject
site (September 25, 1981 ) .
6. Land Use: An existing medical-dental facility
is located on the subject site. To the north are
scattered commercial uses and a church is situated •
east. The K-Mart shopping center is south of the
site while the land adjacent to the west remains
undeveloped.
E. iv I.;.r::( :I OG1, CHARACTERISTICS:
The surrounding properties are a combination of commercial
and institutional uses.
F. n ;::]LAIC SERVICES:
1 . Water and Sewer: A 16" water main extends east-west
on S. 3rd Place adjacent to the southerly border
of the subject' site while a 6" sanitary sewer runs
north-south along the westerly border and an 8"
sewer runs east-west on the north portion.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of -Renton
as per Ordinance requirements. ,
3. Transit: Several METRO Transit routes service
the subject site on S. 3rd Place and Rainier Avenue
S. in the immediate vicinity.
4 . Schools : Not applicable.
5. Recreation: Not applicable.
G. APPLIC I:, S I*0S OF THE Z*'it'IEE CODE:
1 . Sect ion 4-720, P-1 , Public use District
2. Section 4-722B, Special Permits.
H. APPLICA] E SECTIONS OF 7HE Cam,.,I II:Il N SIVE PLAN OR i I I:tiI I;
OFFICIAL CITY I)* tu moo g':
1 . Policy Element, Comprehensive Plan, 9.G-2, p. 22;
Health Care Facilities.
I. Impact ON ! I:Irs NATURALAL OR I:1U 1 1 N ENVIRONMENT:
1 . Natral Systems: Minor.
I
PRELIMINARY REPORT )..THE HEARING EXAMINER
BLENCOE, H.A./BLET_`_E, JANET
OCTOBER 13,' 1981
PAGE THEE
2. Population/Employment: Additional employment could
be approximately 36 assuming 6 employees per 1000
square feet of usable office area (6000 square
feet) .
3. Schools : Not applicable:
4 . Social: Expansion 'of the existing facility may
result in some additional opportunities for social
interaction among the area employees and residents.
5. Traffic: The .proposed expansion will result in
approximately 450 .additional daily trips in the
area. This would represent an increase of approximately
8% over present levels on S. 3rd Place.
J. !N\ ''1*IxiNEN AL ASSESS ;*" / I ;th:1; OLD DETEENINATIE*w:
Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance
and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended,
RCW 43-21C, find a declaration of non-significance was
issted for the subject proposal by the Environmental
Review Committee on September 14 , 1981 . :
K. CIfl.S/DDPAA I r ii, is'TS CONTACTED:
1 . City of Renton Building Division'.
2. City of Renton Engineering Division.
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.
4. City of Renton Utilities Division.
5,. City of Renton Fire Department.
L. is'lI ING DEP `•ri i'moT ANALYSIS:
1 . The subject proposal is consistent with 'the existing
zoning and land use of the property and surrounding
area and can be considered compatible with the
Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial.
2. : It is more appropriate to address the Variance
request first because the crux of the proposal
is concerned with this aspect. The applicant seeks'
a reduction in the required parking from 60 stalls
to 48 stalls for the proposed 6,000 square feet .
addtion. (Section 4-2208-2B of the Parking and
Loading ordinance requires 1 space per 200 square
feet of gross floor area) . The site plan as submitted
indicates "a total of 48 stalls-, including 16 compacts.
This leaves a deficiency of 12 stalls and also
exceeds the maximum 25% compact standard premitted
by Section 4-2206-1A. Both the Traffic Engineering L
and Police Departments have expressed concerns
related to these facts (See comments) .
3. The subje t site is essentially flat and there
are no unisual features regarding shape, topography,
location, or surroundings as required by Section
4-722-G3a of the conditions necessary for the Hearing
Examiner to grant a Variance request. It is true
that the parcel is insufficient in size to accommodate
the parking necessary for the proposed addition.
This fact in itself, however, , does not constitute
undue hardship" and is not, therefore, sufficient
justification for granting such a substantial request.
PRELIMINARY REP---T TO THE HEARING EXAMINER,
BLENCOE, H.A./B-_ 1COE, JANET
OCTOBER 131 1981
PAGE FOUR
4 . There are some alternatives available for the applicant
to consider which will permit expansion and also
comply with existing City codes and ordinances.
These would include a ground level addition on
the S. 3rd Place frontage or a reduced second floor
plans. Based upon the parking plan of 48 stalls
proposed by the applicant, this would permit an
additional 3600 square feet of office space.
5. The findings of 2, 3, and 4 above do not support
the applicant 's request. It is apparent that the
basis for the Variance is economic and this is
not one of the criteria of Section 4-722-G3a.
M. BOWTMENTAL torm'•it I\DAT]tO S
Based upon the above analysis it is recommended that
the tariance request be denied and that the applicant
pursue one of the alternatives outlined in L-5 in a
new Site Approval application.
1
i›
la7k••
1''•:.•
p
lw_11aVl4i.1A,r4Iim3iC1.
l
n:&..:..
g•
icatit,'i.te
az-
7lm.
N.
Umll1.
iI..
l5
o,
Vmfs.
I..
1.,.."
a:.-,
4.-
n49.,
r.
9.:
ip,
a.,
J/
9.
1.
I'
A,
Z1.,
t•e.
ft,'.
I..l.l.'\.#ak-•'•-
U....„.
9.
t.-,.
i..
4.
M.
A•,
0/,.
1.
L„
A'.-...,:.
3I,!'1:
1.,:.u.•
m!
M-w7
u"_
F.-
oi.wi.._m,:
A,f;,,-
1I
a•.
4XR--a7
nrI.
1•
nIca..
e:
1a'e2'1 Iic O..-
1.-(
i-
v
W--• • . \'•,..
7.\.
11 1_1,=__._;
I_"
J00
c•
ri
rn•/
i Tli.ni';"
t!-
t•
w.
4'‘
mrLm,,,,_,".i,-.
i','
i;,-..
7,
i31gl37,,-m.aA 1,"=-
e4Enw.—!.
i.1I9rI,.,,r
i.;I77A'-•,,s4IE-M7E...?B
t..
1iIXEIt5IgT.oYMnw'r1ia1.1;_:",
l
74i4,.
0an4r4
i,
so,
a"
1
1
g.,
miMrw=
ImmM•
NrIhMemCG.
I.
2aOlMaaa•
aM.'mm.unlHlM.-
i.iMimll'
i1a
Z a,,..
k,,
L,"
rI,.....'..-
i..-,..•.
imt-,_,-/ =
m u -
xi
53 2 .1 L'''.... Ire.::.' -.•a, --...., 11 spew .'..„,,,,...am
knt,,,,, s‘ - _
Ili.A ...i• -
11. ,-r7an'imint riliwun rillalo.41u_
lri V.-..- ir...;"...1..
tiosit
111 ra•Nri riot • lo— -,.*
i., 4...1.r,,,,„..... „..,,,,..
y,„.c.._
1.
L-I •a,. 1,--.......,,,,1,:ii 1,...al =12.'..r.'"'•
I;
I se ila . Al-itegi, t 1 rii I. ,, \
L",.
4 ,' tp :11 r, 4,
t.'''. ......4.; F.1,67 A) 3ft 414r, :••1..... .•49•• Al ' •
1sOLLA.•ft Ama.A.L.a....__. ...,
al., c-'ii,- ..,'EN 1 s".'• ii,,qi iiiiVikilikiiilliVI 1:
1. '
s• .•-4,,,,,, ,...!,, . ,I,.!,..1,„g--.— z—,_, ,..cr. .._t.at kw AV,
1 • .......:idi E§":1 wo ., .
2. • . .- • . , - ,.e-ii. MI *
M III , C ‘‘,,NliVAI
i
r'''',.:
40,p,'''' ...
N. '
L. •PIN I Ile 111,' HI um '
mili
Ir/ •4 ies. frli 1 P
or/
716.
77. ‘.
1?:.
7. .,•.':
A'F ill IMATillar 11111h11111111 I.
III vik,
t --‘,- .
Nit ., ir• • ._.--,Pi
1 •,.;‘,N, -A,7t,ii ,..-?'• • LIBERTY
r. IR. N. or.,70-N 7.• , papi
s. ,,, ,11711.1:;! ! 1 -1,.
r- - 1 A vir hN-,, -4.
P R K1, .• i ... - ' 1 1 , xi --1 B.r, psi .2" • - ; ...
L.
Al It , rim w., Zoo . tor....,„.„ _
i ..R2 sinnost JUNIWa 4orPri.21 't t Zi — - WWI tleP_Vir '•'-,Lit•ritt. ., MIMI 11111914151 ammo !PAT h ,,11.\\\ . ‘ k..._,,! . •.•.,. . , • MI014 74 415.4 mn otos 7 rim =am einem e 1
R-.- -1 • 1 Y -- -
c,...,. : ...... . ,,,,.., , MU r111111.r. .1 M,,i. ,A.
In AD EWA, ) 1 9 • ,,,.. - 1 •10' 7 4.:••
v ....
a.'• ' k,•../. '
Any AA I Mint-- 1 CM NO OS'.EiSt MEM
re M;
gm F.IN ', •
44.
1rial„- --- -....-- igNii ff, iini 1 E M lek4IIT•iiM 'I"
1
7 ,le • '
Ill''
41?),k7.:L.E1 .ie, marl ma men Ng,En valor.. : _:
ilif 11i.16,`" law 1. 1,, IP ,'"-. .T_ --:------;
a, i, ,, :...,iip., ..„,••NA I ' 1-17'f....„-ITI) '.\ ' ......,....ii-• il II NAIMIIIIIt.::•;"4- ' •
aft-0624.',s9,./•10; 1r IIIINII.::A liYilifill iiiiiilli 1100110"i10 . , ., :, • .., ./
I,
1 II,II1* 4‘
144,:G'' if 41 ‘ c; ,
9.-.ay, Em.....91•=
im-ri
rum um-arLas
1
LIM AAA
ix>
i Ar, ., L.
vlik...."
1/4\
44.711.1?0,
lk• • .,-
7.-..•..
n.i..,•-h.„....wi.., v m'n • E til
1. so
ar. roe urn tA C 1,SIMI NW'Y. fti ',: ,=.true lir*-4 •...up >a). I,.. ..., • •• soN. 1- ‘ 47.1%
iimart4 •24,11:1=,(t_i orionA•rw, Cs \ c. s.,.,.... • ..19.-1. .. . . ,I f Hi_ „....,_____ •i
1 iii.
0 \ .C.,
citt MT .-1.1.41.!oil' v — ifir, 12:7_.4..-.&,
4
A„...
NJ- III I .... , :,„ ,.,:;. ...., .... _. .; , , h,
01' \ ' TT. crarri,).,, ,....„,-,010,2 1,‘„, 1 ik,...4_,,,,.....rag,s.,i 1MAI • -I 0 sr' o,-.4.- ''`Igr, ..1: ',.....- 1,,,f i';;;10 li
ii "..1"".5. •..-- ' till 4;aik?„ .- I. *,
7::-.:1- „ . : 1 .1a..- ... im li 1-, ) Aliti .,., , ... .,,,, . . ,,. .- ,‘c.../
k._ •',if laik .st\j.1
a" 1/1 e;211', J1 _ All
7,-..•-7. • 14.. l•r-. .21.1 \4, t.',•'9,:?.:•:.••• 9: .
IL •• 111iiiiit%I'
4 .•1ir.'
list. i=It'.. ,iiirv''IV• Cli3/4 min mi1-,..
1.4 '.•.:-1'.':',..d'.' • %. .. \ \ \
I...a ••MN Min-.I=IA, .., %A'1111111........ • raa• 7...-rill-.:= g mrl'. ion rimmtur- - m tr, ar.t. .ii,_ •._ \ ;r ow amt. 112,,k,...i Z.; RID ,lir a p . 1 , „,„ ,PM !.!
V::'-,,1
i:. ' V-.i mpt..,.4...0-.....4 tow mon z t ,
t . en, .i•It owl. -T.: ...• CYA . it,c II/' 1N 19 ' . 0.C.„„•,,
r:',';'-'•-• .' ' • •••----- \ \. \ ' timr ma 'ma . • ,
v..,. _ .. no 1 •IC-,..fA,.:,''. ......„
I ... '14 ''‘ * L:- 'a - 1• "U. •• !
iv,7 . r: ),
ii•
A
I
ott sly'i mi=•; rim..,,,- Emir ,
i. ,,, 1.-1; .„,,,,,,•,,,
1_,.7' i . ip...". on;
s....m: a:=.• '114.0,4
CT•2If•1.1 111,111 1-Ing: cum
41
A i 4 . I !l ..
k
I .I h1111-
1 '
t r•• , ' / -• -11 =mal- ma.,..'--411.119111111
9" '• --—7"—
j
94 1- ' ' 0• . ‘• • --- .. - ___.. .. '. • !._L - —.- 411".itA.. ""'" IlmillibW—
I
w -..,.../
R—iv ,. dz: ..... 4,,
21*-1111:f
3 0 • 1.1 l' NW L....1 17.1 1 L.• '9.. = a ;
i
BLENCOE, H.A./BLENCOE, JANET
1
SA-017-81 & V-019-81
1
APPLICANT Blencoe 1 B.A. & Janet TOTAL AREA + 30r 800 sq. ft.
PRINCIPA ACCESS Via S. 3rd Place
EXISTING ZONING F-1 , Public Use District
EXISTING USE Medical-dental facility
PROPOSED USE +6000 square foot addition to existing facility
COMPREHE SIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial
COMMENTS
1
1
i
11
BLENCO SITE APPROVAL SA-017-81
VARIANCE V-018-81
South Elevation----facing South 3rd Place
Proposal is to add a second floor to the existing
office building.'
1
1
11 !
II L
IP 1111111
r JIMM
11 [ 11
a::
r7•*,. t
Oar: 1=1 .174 •-- mi.. ••••• r•• ti LEL
r :
i
I
I
I
I I
I.
BLENCO SITE APPROVAL - Professional Office Building Expansion in P-1 Zone
SA - 017 - 81 NI
VARIANCE - Reduce required parking
V - 018 - 81
0
P.
I
i
s,rac i i
sc.- 0i
a
fu,t© El
r.
I ew scot i Qn se
wPMv® i_ I'
I
sue
H
J .....____
r_ _ __ __,_ ____
SOUTH 3RD PLACE
I
I I
II
Ij
I
I
pls.( al Pl anni r
1 12-197S
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Appli cati • n : ,_ , .T'. I ? " 4.1'4.', :i' f' :sl44.0..0,7 ,a ,t f .
µ ,. wet
befoor aI k meifreatt@Jew «I e ' c P1'•h` .% ,,,. Cv-wssuar.04e.r oe' opw&di giro toe:. 60 8 ram® 9®S f gLocation :
Applicant: is 4, .
1.%;. `_ .
a`i ::'
f)
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
Police Department A°rR;S. MEETING DATE :
Public Works Department ER.C' to ae
Engineering Division.
Traffic Engineering
Building Division
Utilities Engineering
AD
Fire Dep rtment
Other) :
COMMENTS 0 SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING FO THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT 9:UU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tip A TEND THE ARC,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT $Y 5:OU P.M. ON
REVIEWING EPARTMENT/DIVISION :cii_---
A proved Approved with Conditions Not Approve
S'<7 . 4 /e K ov y - /3uic J/ 7) G' t-/tiS ,eGE-r, cZ
Fat e.i. J. 3 ,e-dvrY-L. ,
s/17
Signature f Director r Aut orized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Uriu r'y
Ap roved i Approved with Conditions Not
Approve1.A. 61141K1 014
0.1..___ 3/13/e7
Signature.,of Di ector or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENTanIVISION : %
4{7c1 - W/ 477 c
Approved , P / Approved with Conditions Not Ap proved
Gf/y S L //5- 1-172c7-C1 6(-% `/
2,0
N/1,
i `A' LUL,J `-)'<
c a/. .e
Les,L v
1 v-t-rC•L i It l 0-
8)&;
Signature of Director or. Authorized Rep esentative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :G .
J
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
a) V.-v-4-Z-ed
0
m't 3 Z cP/Signature of Director or Aut razed Re resentatiP ve Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PC
X Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
Signature f erH'ectc ^ or A horized Representative ate
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
POLICE
Approved Approved with Conditions xxx Not Approved
As presented there is not enough information to do anything but disapporve
the request. How' many trips are anticipated? Where will the patrons
of the new addition park? Will forty parking spaces adequately serve
the addition? These are just a few of the questions that need to be answerE
prior to being able to decide if the variance is justified.
7/,
Lt. Persson 3/3/81
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved,Approved with Conditions Not Approved
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No(s) : SA-017-81 , V-019-81
Environmental Checklist No..: ECF-020-81
Description of Propoal: Request for site
approval to allow
expansion of medical/dental
facility thru second .
floor addition and
variance to reduce
required parking
from 60 stalls to
50 stalls.
Proponent: BLENCOE, H.A. and
JANET
Location of Proposal:138, 200, 206 S.
3rd Place
Lead Agency: Planning Department
This propos 1 was reviewed by the ERC on March 4, 1981 and
September 9, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock
of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted
from: Richard Houghton, David Clemens, Ronald Nelson, Don
Persson, Roger Blaylock, Gary Norris, Steve Munson and James
Matthew
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-020-81 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
Steve Munson DATED: March 4, 1981
2) Applic tions: S -017-71 , V-019-81
3) Recomm ndations for a declaration of non-significance:
Planni g Department, Building Department, Fire Department;
Utilities Engineering Division, Engineering Department
and Traffic Engineering Department.
More information:: Police Department
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this development does not have, significant adverse impact
on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW
43.21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by
the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and
other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significence:
Will not adversely affect adjacent properties
Signatures:
26/2 tics
ona e son id R. Clemens, Acting
Building Dir ctor Planning Director
R and C. H ug ton, ing
blic Works Director U
Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application : e — 460 ,- 46%0I 02404
66 i ® el ecal® e e a 04 `s' '®
I /
a '.' R-
Location :
Appl i cant .gs(12 fi (104 a` ilt. eigl
TO: Par s Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ? 'a'
Police Department ATRT6. MEETING DATE :
Public Works Department IC® 8® es
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building Division
1
Utilities Engineering
1
Fire Department
Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
1 AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO AITEND THE ARC,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:0o P .M. ON
REVIEWING DE' ARTMENT/DVISION :
POLICE
Approved Approved with Conditions xxx Not Approved
As presented there is not enough information to do anything but disapporve
the request. How many trips are anticipated? Where will the patrons
of the new addition park? Will forty parking spaces adequately serve
the addition? These are just a few of the questions that need to be answered
prior to being able to decide if the variance is justified.
Lt. . . Persson 3/3/81
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
App oved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
1
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
312l 1 Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Appli cation :J/TE oQoaA (574.017..a0 or 46064,02
00r 4idi'' to st e dieeal-derdo. 14.te e'(t4 ! £J4A/ c1 C i.o/$•)
Pole, e erAer 6o A% Ia '-7t ` yor r0 w. S/IS
Location : 139,a00,secs. 3 X
1
Appl i cant.:
I oti. #9. EiVcDimee / .T. N afabit e. e
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 17V7Y/AgY
Police Department MEETING DATE :
P blic Works Department EAC. " 40 j1V/T-IY,
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building Division
1I
Utilities Engineering
Fire Department
Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : bzoo
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
1.///
s'S// If
f/ director or Au/ ignaturerized Representative ate
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
I I I i
311311in Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION tREIE.VSHEET
Appli 2cation :) /re- ;I4si '
k ,^rot CSA-0170. ` 49r' '=4 ®o®I obstiL
I
4....4 erha ca. cifeca7 1 , ..: ( & UeVRijt/.. 4I . rf} e .1 !`mr'df Qta'A®a,
40
Location :
Applicant :4w to ID
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : /: ":', wA",
Police Department PerRre. MEETING DATE :
QQ a @ 4, ;cr,Public .o'rks Department
u
engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building Division
Utilities Engineering
Fire Department
Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
iIF YOUR DEPA TMENT/DIVIISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T ATTEND THE ARC,
PLEASE PROVIbE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. N
REVIEWING DEARTMENT/D VISION :
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
a) d?„,z,..:Z- c.,----re,Le—e----2----as, s.,),..... e___ .7.-
1- A..,_._
Ck___ Z, 3/2 AP7
Signature of Director or Aut rized Repres ntative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
r Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Appl i cati on : / e ' 6 , jee, Ir. 2 6
47 0B• 0.eidelistn. eJ iDe ®Sawp Kole ea 1666, 1 I/AV p
1.1§04e041,0, rasa e®&007 Gem vtie. cse) intaff °Ai 90s, ffs
Location :
r.
Applicant : a''6 e,, ic„ e
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :siZ
Police Department MEETING DATE :
Public Works Department e RC. ee se
Engineering Division
1/ Traffic Engineering
Building Division
Utilities Engineering
Fire Department
Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
li IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON
I I I
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
ice, c7Z L ii/G/, F
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
Signature of Director or Authorized Rep esentative Date
I I
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
1 Planning
12-1979
1
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
APPli cation : / ' i"r L/ki° ('fr 2 ®®,,A
0 GCS •R a t® rya i M
ash Po Deg* re itegar&e91,0 $r cam 64 6 iffS (7°A® 9:19S741 g
Location :
Applicant:, 4'
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :_____)4221r4a
1
Police Department Ar r MEETING DATE :
Public Works Department R.C. IN e 3/414/
Engiineering Division
Traffic Engineering
I '
Building Division
1
Uti !1ities Engineering
F
V Fire Department
Other) :
I
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT 9 : 00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENC ROOM.
IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO AITEND HE ARC,
PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 0u P .M. ON
1 I I
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
3-7f /cW/Z v/ i o G(/ — r36e'c:;'7h t lG/f.4/S' ,,,eZ432.f i2 %
12._____ 7 /r7
Signature f Director r Aut orized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/'DIVISION : U,' ry
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approve
re2- 026,__3 i 7
Signature of Dictor or Authorized Representative Date
E. M. CAPLOW AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
REAL ESTATE - INVESTMENTS
16661 VENTURA BLVD., SUITE 3 6
TELEPHONE (213) 995-1341 ENCINO, CALIFORNIA 91436'
April 22, 1981
Mr. H. A. Blencoe
112 M.nterey Drive, N.E.
Renton, Washington 98055
Refer nce: RENTON MART/PARKING
Dear r. Blencoe:
I have consulted with our attorneys in reference to the Kmart
lease and your offer to lease parking from the Kmart site.
Of course we would like to cooperate with you, but we cannot
do so at this time.
We have several requests similar to yours that we are proces-
sing t this time. I will keep your letter on file and in the
future if it is possible to comply with your request, I will
immediately contact you.
Very truly yours,
E. CAPLOW AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
k Kelsey
Vice President
i
MK/elw RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
O C T 13 1931
AM PM
718€9110011L:S192 3 4I516
A
E1,. M NO _ 54, 0 /1 -ff/
I
HEARING INFORMATION
FOR RECEIVED
MEDICAL-DENTAL BUILDING CITY OF RENT NON
OF RENTON HEARING EXAMJNEFR
OCT' 3 1981LOCATEDAT: AM PM
7I8 911o:1119 : 1('- ''i.L`;. ,'s-138, 200, & 206 Third Place So.
Renton, Washington ii
Our .ecision to build a second floor:
1) Need for doctors and dentists in downtown Renton
2) Hardships for senior citizens and others to get to the
Valley General Hospital area
a) The reluctance on some people to make the effort to take
the trip to the Valley General area
b) Lack of transportation
c) Cost of transportation
3) Building design lends itself to a second floor
4) Ile will update and modernize the building
a) With an elevator
b) Air conditioning
c) New heating system throughout
5) uilding will be architecturally designed to enhance the
area. Our architect is Ben Woo.
6) New landscaped, black topped, paved, drained parking area
PROBLEMS:
Parking - core area has no requirement
Our requirement is 60 parking stalls.
Our plan is laid out to give 48 paved/striped parking stalls. We
have also secured two parking stalls from the adjacent property to the
east. Therefore the proposed improvements will provide for 48 parking
stalls plus two or a grand total of 50 parking spaces.
We have written to the K-Mart people trying to lease additional
parking; we have tried to secure other leased parking spaces. We have
also contacted Baugh Construction Company and tried to build a second
Hearing Information for Medical-Dental Building
Continued
PROBLEMS: (continued)
level parking on our lot on the West side of the clinic. After considerable
study, Baugh Construction told us it was just not practical to put an elevated
parking structure on this site. We have also contacted a realtor, Mr. Joe
Donoghue, who is the realtor that represents the Pacific National Bank on
their real estate transactions and requested that he contact Dr. Vukov, the
owner of the Spa property and the bank property to see if it was possible to
build an elevated parking lot for all three businesses. Joe Donoghue tells
me that he could not generate the interest of these parties to proceed with
this sort of plan.
At this time we are requesting a variance from the 60 parking stall
requirement for a second floor addition with the understanding that we now
have or will have 48 parking stalls on the subject property plus two addition l
parking next door thatlwe have acquired. We would also like to point out that
there seem to be street parking available also for this building, which
should minimize our requirement.
I
I
October 16, 1981
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION .
APPLICANT: H. A. and Janet Blencoe FILE NO. SA-017781 ,
V-019-81
LOCATION:
i
138,I 200, & 206 S. 3rd Place
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval for a +6,000 square foot
second floor addition to an existing medical/dental clinic
and a variance to reduce the required parking from 60 stalls
to 48 stalls.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:Planning Department Recommendation: Denial
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval of site plan; Denial o
Variance fi
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The !Planning Department preliminary report was received by the
REPORT: Examiner on October 7,. 1981 .
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on October 13, 1981 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Steve Munson, Planning Department,
presented the Planning Department staff report, and entered the following exhibits into
the record:
Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department
report and other pertinent documents
Exhibit #2: Site Plan with staff comments
Exhibit #3: Elevation Drawing
The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was:
I
Harry A. Blencoe
112 Monterey Drive N.E.
Renton, WA 98056
MrL Blencoe drew the Examiner's attention to the fact that no parking requirements exist
for the central business district of Renton. He described efforts to acquire additional
parking space to meet the city's requirement for 60 stalls; however, he noted, although
contacts with adjacent property owners including the K-Mart Corporation had resulted in
acquisition of two additional stalls, a deficiency of 10 stalls remains. Other efforts
to; investigate the possibility of construction of an elevated parking structure with
combined useage with three other property owners had been unsuccessful . Mr. Blencoe
advised that the building lends itself well to a second story addition to fulfill a need
fo'r medical facilities in the area, and interest from the medical community has been
encouraging. He Submitted a letter received from K-Mart Corporation into the record:
1 1 Exhibit #4: Letter to Mr. Blencoe from
E. M. Caplow & Associates,. Inc. ,
dated April 22, 1981
Responding it support of the application was:
I
Janet Blencoe
112 Monterey Drive N.E.
Renton, WA 98056
Mrs. Blencoe objected to a statement contained in Section L.5 of the staff report indicating
that the basis for the variance request is economic which is not one of the criteria of the
ordinance. She stated that the facility serves an important function in providing close-
in medical services for a large faction of elderly residents in the downtown area of Renton
SA-01, :.J Page Two
for whom transportation costs, and availability are difficult, and staff at Valley General
Hospital recognize the need for satellite clinics, one of which located in the Renton
Highlands is functioning well ! She noted 't',+t Ole existing building lends itself well
to the addition of a second floor, is needed, in the central downtown area of Renton, and
the site is serviced by public transit. Mrs,: Blencoe suggested that the allowable
percentage for compact cars be increased from 25% to 50% to accommodate the shortage of
stalls and allow additional planting area.
The Examiner inquired regarding the extent of the parking exemption for the central business
district. Mr. Blaylock stated that the boundary is located approximately four blocks from
the site. The Examiner noted that the applicant is actually requesting two variances for
the proposal , the first to provide less parking space than required by ordinance, and
secondly, to provide additional compact car parking space.
There was no response to the Examiner's request for additional testimony. Therefore, the
hearing regarding SA-017-81 and V-019-81 was closed by the Examiner at 9:43 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner
now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicants, H. A. and Janet Blencoe, filed a request for a site approval for the
expansion of a medical clinic together with a variance to provide less than the
required number of parking spaces.
2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning
Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as
Exhibit #1 .
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been
issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) , responsible
official .
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
6. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height
requirements of Section 4-710 (P-1 ; Public/Quasi-Public) of Title IV, Ordinance No.
1628, Code of General Ordinances.
7. The subject property is located at 138, 200 and 206 S. 3rd Place, just north of the
K-Mart Shopping Center. An established medical/dental clinic is located on the
subject site.
8: The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as
suitable for commercial uses.
9. The subject site is zoned P-1 , a classification imposed at the time of the enactment
of the original zoning code. The site was annexed into the city in 1948 by Ordinance
No. 1322.
10. The current clinic is a one-story facility which the applicant proposes enlarging
by the addition of a second story. A site approval for a non-municipal project is
required by Section 4-710(3) .
The applicants propose adding approximately 6,000 square feet to the\zlinic which
would double the floor space of the clinic.
11 . The clinic would require 60 parking spaces based on the figure of one parking stall
per 200 square feet pursuant to Section 4-2208(2) (B) , whereas only 50 are proposed.
In addition, 16 compact car stalls are proposed, whereas Section 4-2206(1 ) (A) requires
that 12 stalls be for compact cars. The applicants have requested a variance under
Section 4-722(G) to accomplish the easing of parking requirements.
12. The applicants have made attempts to provide the additional stalls in negotiation
with K-Mart and other adjacent property owners. These attempts have not been
successful . H
13. The Planning Department indicated that the applicant has not satisfied the criteria
necessary to warrant the approval of a variance.
jr ,
SA-017-81 Page Three
14. The subject site is just west of the central business district and immediately adjacent
to the large Rainier Avenue commercial/retail trade corridor. The K-Mart store is
across the street to the north and a health spa is located to the north along ith
other retail businesses.
CONCLUSIONS:
Variance)
1 . Since the variance would be necessary to permit the proposed expansion, that r quest
must be reviewed first. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that they are denied
reasonable use of the subject property because of either the unique size, shap ,
topography, location or surroundings.
2. The lot is level and well serves the existing clinic, and, in fact, a 4,000 square
foot addition could be constructed on the second floor without any need for a Variance
and without overcrowds g the lot. While the original clinic must provide 30 stalls,
the additional 20 stalls the applicant can now provide would accommodate a 4,000
square foot addition. Since each additional stall can accommodate 200 gross square
feet of clinic, 20 additional stalls would enable the applicant- to add 4,000 square
feet to the clinic. The' failure to grant a variance will not deprive the applicant
of reasonable use of tis property.
3. The addition which woulld' be permitted is reasonable in light of the size of th
property. Permitting the expansion without the requisite number of parking sp ces
would exteld to the applicant a special privilege in violation of Section 4-72 (G) (3) (C) .
It would also create similar demand from other establishments in this congeste area
located close to Rainier Avenue, a major retail trade area.
4. The applic nt has also asked that the compact car provisions of the code be ex?anded
beyond the minimum requirement of the code, and. this also would be granting the
applicant a special privilege not available on a general basis and not based op any
unique property condition other than that the applicant wishes to expand an operation
on a lot which is not large enough for the intended purpose.
Further, providing insufficient parking could force users of the clinic to par
on the street or use other private parking lots in the area, such lots reserve
for the patrons of these other uses.
Site Approval
5. The Planni g Department's recommendation to deny the variance 11 -: ,:: revi w
of the remrinder of the site plan, but the plans and elevation . r,.. ,= a.;.,.. ;=e r
to indicate that the expansion would serve the public use and interest. The 4,000
square foot expansion of the clinic instead of 6,000 square feet as requested ill
serve the owntown population of the City of Renton and will provide easier access
for these and other patients as the downtown core is easier to reach by public
transit.
6. The plans indicate that the parking lot will be landscaped and as long as the
addition ma tches the appearance of the original clinic, the expansion will be la
well-coordinated addition to the city and prevent the overconcentration of clinics
in the area surrounding Valley General Hospital .
DECISION:
The variance is denied.
The site plan is approved to the extent that a 4,000 square foot addition to the second
floor may be permitted.
ORDERED THIS 16th day of October, 1981 .
Fred J. Ka an
Land Use H ing Examiner
I
I
SA-017-81 Page Four
TRANSMITTED THIS 1 th day of October, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to thepartiesofrecord:
Harry A. and Janet Blencoe, 112 Monterey Dr. N.E., Renton, WA98056
TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of October, 1981 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director ,
David Clemens, Acting Planning Director
Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman
and Members, Planning Commission (8)
Ron Nelson, Building Official
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Bill Seil , Renton Record-Chronicle
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration mustbefiledinwritingon ;er before October 30, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that thedecisionoftheExaminerisbasedonerroneousprocedure, errors of law or fact, error injudgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available atthepriorhearingmaymakeawrittenrequestforreviewbytheExaminerwithinfourteen14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth thespecificerrorsrelied ,upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of therecord, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires thatsuchappealbefiledwiththeCityClerkaccompanyingafilingfeeof $25.00 and meetingotherspecifiedrequirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection intheFinanceDepartment, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost insaiddepartment.
I
OF R
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
Z 0
o BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING90XAMINERCO.
FRED J. ItAUFMAN. 235 2593
0,
9gT O SEP1EU e-
November 16, 1981
Mr. H. A. Blencoe
P.O. 'Box 358
Renton, WA 98057
RE: File No. SA-017-81 , V-019-81 ; H. A. & Janet Blencoe;
Site Approval and Variance.
Dear Mr. Blencoe:
The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was
published on October 16, 1.981 and. reconsidered on October 30, .1981
has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by
ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being
transmitted to the Planning Department this date for filing.
Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or
information is required. . Per your request, we have enclosed a copy
of Exhibit #4 from the hearing record.
Sincerely,
Vajtti‘414--
Fred J. Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
J
OF R4,
o THE CITY OF RENTON
z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
Z nJl ' t. o
o • BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXA11(IINER
90 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-25930,
9gTD SEPSE
O
P
October 30,. 1981
Mr. H. A. Blencoe
P.O. Box 358
Renton, WA 98057
RE: File No. SA-017-81 , V-019-81 ; H. A. and Janet Blencoe; Request for
Reconsideration.
I
Dear Mr. Blencoe:
I have reviewed your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter
and must again, unfortunately, conclude that the criteria necessary to grant a
variance are not satisfied by the current record in this matter.
The criteria for the granting of a variance are quite specific, and economic
considerations must be ignored as most people can justify an economic hardshi
if they are required to comply with code requirements.
First, the applicant must suffer undue hardship as a result of special
circumstances including the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings ,
and the strict application of the code deprives the applicant of rights enjoyed
by others in that zonell. The record does not disclose any evidence which would
justify granting the variance under these criteria. The proposed plans are too
elaborate and large for the subject site. The applicant can reasonably add
4,000 square feet to the existing structure although a 6,000 square foot
addition would spread the costs of expansion over a greater leasable area.
Economics do not justify relief.
Second, a variance must not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or other properties. The provision of insufficient parking could either force
patrons to use the city right-of-way in this area or use the K-Mart parking
lot which would diminish the parking available to K-Mart's customers.
Finally, the approval must not constitute a grant of special privilege and
not be more than the minimum necessary to grant relief. A variance to allow
the applicant to provide 10 less parking stalls than required by law would
grant the applicant a special privilege, and is not justified in the present
case. Either approval of the variance will constitute a special privilege
not based upon physical limitations of the site or it will provide a precedent
to extend the same waiver of required parking to other projects which are
oversized for their respective lots.
1I
H. A. Blencoe
Page Two
October 30,
1'
1981
I I
What is to ,prevent other property owners from either acquiring undersized
properties for development or trying to inappropriately expand structures on
undersized parcels if relief were granted in this instance.
The variance must be denied.
I
A new appeal period has now been established for this matter to expire on
November 13, 1981 . Please feel free to contact this office for procedural
information.
Sincerely,
1; ‘<
494-4-Ncr-go-^----
Fred J. Kau man
Hearing Examiner
cc: Partiles of Record
I
I
October 30, 1981 REC IVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINE
OCT 3 1981Mr. Fred J: Kaufman
AM F 7LandUseHearingExaminer
7Ih19;IOilrLs Y c` :3::City of Renton
200 Mill Ave. So.
Renton, WA 98055
Re: H. A. and Janet Blencoe
File #SA-017-81
V-019-81
Dear Mr. Kaufman:
We wish to appeal the decision of October 13, 1981 by the Land Use
Examiner, Mr. Fred Kaufman, for the following reasons:
1) We do not believe that the presentation by Steve Munson, a
staff member of the City of Renton Planning Department, showed a true
presentation of our application for the variance request.
2) The handout material concerning our application dated October
13, 1981 at the public hearing does not have the correct site drawing
which may ,or may not have influenced the hearing examiner. The one on
exhibit is the first parking drawing; whereas our Architect, Ben Woo
prepared a second parking site drawing dated June 30, 1981, showing 48
parking stalls, plus two stalls on the adjoining property to the east.
3) We think that special circumstances should be considered for
this downtown expansion of a Medical-Dental facility where patients can
walk to or have minimum transportation expense.
4) The granting of a variance from 60 car parking to 50 car parking
should not in any way be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious in anyway to adjacent property owners.
5) The hearing examiner pointed out it takes approximately 6
persons per 1,000 square feet for staffing office space; by inquiring
from the doctors we find the following:
Dr. Grimm has 2 and sometines 3 nurses
Dr. Petrich
Dr. Ochs
have up to .4 assistants on duty at any time
Dr. MacDougall has 2 nurses
Therefore a total of 13 in 6,000 square feet of present space.
Therefore, we can conclude the figure of 36 is on the upper
side and probably 18 persons for staffing per floor is more realistic.
Mr. Fred J. !Kaufman
Page 2
October 30, 1981
6) The expense of an elevator to service the second floor should
cost about $26,000 or on the square foot basis, this cost could be pro
rata over the second flior; hence 4,000 square feet equals $6.50 and
6,000 square feet equals $4.33. To make this project a viable one we
need 6,000 square feet.
Thank you for your past consideration and hopeful reconsideration
in this matter.
Yours very truly,
4 '6,
H. A. Blencoe
HAB:sjb
I
I
I
j '
October 30, 1981 RECEIV D
CITY OF RENTO
HEARING EXAMINER
OCT 3 1981Mr. Fred J. Kaufman
Land Use Hearing Examiner AM PM
City of Renton 718i1 Atii:1&syF
200 Mill Ate. So.
Renton, WAI 98055
Re: H. A. and Janet Blencoe
File #SA-017-81
V--019-81
Dear Mr. Kaufman:
We wish to appeal the decision of October 13, 1981 by the Land Use
Examiner, Mr. Fred Kaufman, for the following reasons:
1) We do not believe that the presentation by Steve Munson, a
staff member of the City of Renton Planning Department, showed a true
presentation of our application for the variance request.
2) The handout material concerning our application dated October
13, 1981 at the public hearing does not have the correct site drawing
which may or may not have influenced the hearing examiner. The one on
exhibit is the first parking drawing; whereas our Architect, Ben Woo
prepared a second parking site drawing dated June 30, 1981, showing 48
parking stalls, plus two stalls on the adjoining property to the east.
3) We think that special circumstances should be considered for
this downtown expansion of a Medical-Dental facility where patients can
walk to or have minimum transportation expense.
4) The granting of a variance from 60 car parking to 50 car parking
should not in any way be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious, in anyway to adjacent property owners.
5) The hearing examiner pointed out it takes approximately 6
persons p'er 1,000 square feet for staffing office space; by inquiring
from the doctors we find the following:
Dr. Grimm has 2 and sometines 3 nurses
Dr. Petrick
have up to 4 assistants on duty at any one timeDr. Ochs
Dr. MacDougall has 2 nurses
I
Therefore a total of 13 in 6,000 square feet of present space.
Therefore, we can conclude the figure of 36 is on the upper
side and probably 18 persons for staffing per floor is more realistic.
i I
IIIIIIIIIr
Mr. Fred J. Kaufman
Page 2
October 30, 1981
i
I
6) The expense of an elevator to service the second floor should
cost out $26,000 or on the square foot basis, this cost could be .pro
rata over the second floor; hence 4,000 square feet equals $6.50 and
6,0001square feet equals $4.33. To make this project a viable one we
need 6,000Isquare feet.J
Thank you for your past consideration and hopeful reconsideration
in this matter.
Yours very truly,
H. A. Blencoe
HAB:sjb I
I
I
I
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath
disposes land states: I
I
That on the l6th day of October 19 81 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing
a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the
i I
parties of record in !the below entitled application or petition.
24(4,2•1169-,[2.
1/
i I
Subscribed anld sworn this 4 day of 0-0-6 ' 19 A'/.
Notary Public in and for th of,
Washington, residing at
I i
I I
81H.A. & Janet Blencoe; SA-01Application, Petition or Case: SA-017-81
I
I
The minutu contailn a tilt a4 the paAtia of tcecatcd. )
F. FILE
FILE TITLE
on
P J 15 I
v./ ' •. ice, ..
i.
I I
I
I
1
1
1