Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA81-061BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE MICROFILMED
ainwr -fam--
M'.3J M.
4,- -- .s. --arPANIMP SME.1110,4i;•:1,
1111111 . I , ' r -Tara& W.-WWI Eylall I11II.1
1011 ,I rAWS1.1iiv AMWM110111 1111IIill . 1 ifr \_;„....
L: t.
t,
J Moor*
16" 1 111FM MP
may
f
I
ialIMILIIIII 4,. 111102
s
ow D.41.u. .s • .aa
M.M.MN vN•Iwr...
1.1 [..
wa oohs*YV M,bb nw..bl.W.n M.W.....
qM f....NII MYW
1.10T411311 wO......
3,1YA\4 3VV1
t."
M...ib
1111l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIip Illllllullll_ I IUD I
fie, „1 101 III L1A----1111111611.11111
IIIIiI iillllllilllllllllllllllihlllll11 IIIIIIfIIIIINIillllli IIIII I
III
ullifiil I III r I1 a 111 11!
rT
Tililiilliiiillfi li i ni t 11 11 1 jllUl Ifilllll IIIIIIII I(iillilll! III I IINIIIII IIII f
iili ini liiir 1671111171 11w1llll®Nl
l Ii1 i l i Il
i 'ljpj ll ligllpll!jllil i i
ih{l;!(lllI( llII ilijr 1iIjjl,i
t ,/-
i
r-
ISLE LAKE MT VIEW
11nw.dt PS&E
OF R4,
0 THE CITY Or' RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
a rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • )0 P6)6APY\4 v1 1N1t(
90 co' Building and Zoning Department 235 - 2550
0,
94 7-1)SEPI°
4'
January 8, 1982
Mr. Lyle Pickle
3719 N. Park Street
Renton, Washington 98056
Dear Mr. Pickle:
On November 4, 1981, you were notified by this office that the application for your
project known as the Isle Lake Mountain View Condominiums would be considered an
expired file and a new application required if you did not respond by November 21,
1981, to make arrangements for consultant selection and Environmental Impact
Statement preparation. Since we did not receive a response, on November 28, 1981,
your file was forwarded to the office of the Hearing Examiner with the
recommendation that it be dismissed. It has been and you have until January 25, 1982,
to pick up the documents or they will be disposed of.
If you have any questions, contact this office.
Very truly yours,
SL /friti#040 —
Steve Munson
Assistant Planner
OF R /
1/
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR
ml
O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
90 co.
0,
9gT`O SEP1c_10
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred J. Kaufman
Land Use Hearing Examiner
FROM: Steve Munson £
Assistant Planner
RE: SITE APPROVAL (SA-061-80) - LYLE PICKLE
On December 4 , 1981 , this department notified Mr. Pickle
that it was necessary for him or his representative to meet
with the City staff to discuss arrangements for preparing
the environmental impact statement required by the Environmental
Review Committee in its Declaration of Significance issued
September 7, 1981 . He was also informed on December 4 , 1981 ,
that failure to do so by December 21 , 1981 , would result
in the expiration of his file and require a new application.
We are, therefore, transmitting the file and all pertinent
documents to your office along with the recommendation that
it be dismissed .
SM:wr
Attachments
OF i
A
THE CITY OF RENTON
U L
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
aiLL
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0ccr 235- 2550
0E0 SEPS (
P
MEMORANDUM
August 27 , 1981
TO : Environmental Review Committee
FROM: Roger Blaylock
Planning Department
RE : ISLE LAKE MOUNTAIN VIEW CONDOMINIUMS (PICKLE)
The attached material is in response to our request
for further information. As we will be reviewing the
matter again at our next ERC meeting on September 2nd,
it is forwarded to you now . for your study.
Attachments
Note : Please return all plans . Thank you.
07 OF PENTONR
Iennth PS \• -INC.
SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1031 • PUYALLUP,WA 98371
PUY: 845-8833 SEA: 838-3474
OF RE•N
August 25, 1981 cl FI'\CEp o
2
1
AUK 26 1981
Mr. Roger J. Blaylock
Associate Planner NG DEQP'/
City of Renton
Municipal Building
200 Mill Ave. South
Renton, Washington 98005 t
Re: Isle Lake Mountain View Condominiums 81-1903
Dear Mr. Blaylock:
This response is to your letter of August 6, 1981.
Item 1: The development of the site has a maximum of 200 units
and we propose to place 188 units on the property in four buildings.
The buildings will be constructed of concrete and will be very fire
resistant. The site will be well landscaped and blended into the
natural surroundings. The portion to the South will have a large buffer
strip consisting of the right-of-way which won't! be constricted for
vehicle traffic due to the excessive slope. The East portion of the
project has two (2) abutting right-of-ways with a ditch area between
them at various points. The area to be developed is Lincoln Avenue
which is the traveled roadway. The adjacent right-of-way to the site
is not opened and has a drainage course cutting through it. The
drainage area will be a blend of natural and professional landscaping.
The area will be enhanced with additional evergreens. The trees will be
the type of which are common to the Padific Northwest. The landscaping
on the site will be a shown on the plans. The intensity of development
will enhance the existing site and surrounding community.
Item 2: The property adjacent to the proposal has natural barriers
to the East, West and South. The West has a dropoff of about 30 feet to
a lower plateau with industrial businesses. This type of use is compatible
with the condominiums proposed. The southerly and easterly adjacent
right-of-way are also natural buffers. The area to the east is elevated
above the site and will not be damaged because of the natural vegetation.
A two story-stick development was laid out and the site was crowded with
100 units. As the height of the project increased, the ratio of open
space increased proportionately. The parking has a better layout and allows
50% to be covered. By using the building concept, the parking is covered
and there is a maximum of open space. Therefore, the adjacent property
is enhanced, rather than damaged.
Page 2 of 2
Item 3: The storm sewer construction will follow the natural
drainage pattern which exists at the freeway. We have made a complete
analysis of the May Creek Basin in this area and the contributing land.
The City has approved our design for filling the property down stream
at the outfall. We will design the on-site system with 100% retention
and require oil-water seperators at the outfalls. The offset storm
water will take its natural course along the easterly property line.
The driveways to the project will have culverts large enough to handle
a 100 year. flood. All engineering will be examined and approved by theCityofRentonEngineer.
Item 4: The utilities will he installed at the developers expense.
Water will he extended to the North and intersect with the existing main.
This procedure will create a loop system and increase the reliability forfireflow. An adequate number of fire hydrants will be placed stra-
tegically on the site. The guard on the gate at night will help enchancethepoliceprotection. The method of landscaping will not allow the
project to be a throughfare. Therefore, a minimum of problems are expected
from the residents.
Item 5: The existing homes in the area will notice little view1.
blockage because the natural vegetation has already made a barrier which
will conceal the new buildings. The property to the east has a continous
slope up for the proposed project, this slope gives the existing residents
a distinct advantage in keeping their view.
Cordially,
dLirl'"7:74L
Robert A. Bennett, PLS
Project Manager
RAB/kdb
ennettL ANC.
SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1031 • PUYALLUP,WA 98371
PUY: 845-8833 SEA: 838-3474
September 21, 1981
Roger J. Blaylock
Associate Planner
The City of Renton
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 93055
Re: Isle Lake Mountain View 81-1903
Dear Mr. Blaylock
Mr. Pickle received your comments on the project of Isle Lake
Mountain View September 16, 1981. We are appealing all of the
items listed in your correspondence of September 14, 1981.
If it is possible to meet with the key people in the department
before the appeal is heard, it would be appreciated.
Ifre-;
27-
147V--/Ze(
Robert A. Bennett
cgk RFN
cc Lyle Pickle
v RF D TO
IS k`
CEP 21 1981411111/
if 004 t110
5° / it
4, s+
ill.NG DES
OF R4,
4 © ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
Z JL
o
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
oco-
gT60 SEPSE
O
P
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred J. Kaufman
Land Use Hearing Examiner
FROM: Steve Munson g ill
Assistant Planner
RE: SITE APPROVAL (SA-061-80) - LYLE PICKLE
On December 4 , 1981 , this department notified Mr. Pickle
that it was necessary for him or his representative to meet
with the City staff to discuss arrangements for preparing
the environmental impact statement required by the Environmental
Review Committee in its Declaration of Significance issued
September 7 , 1981 . He was also informed on December 4, 1981 ,
that failure to do so by December 21 , 1981 , would result
in the expiration of his file and require a new application.
We are, therefore, transmitting the file and all pertinent
documents to your office along with the recommendation that
it be dismissed.
SM:wr
Attachments
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
RECEIVED DEC 2 :i 1981
CITY OF P.ENTON AM
PM
HEARINii };.AMIi1ER 718191I0,11112t11213t4t5,6
31
AM PM
718
OF J
U
di THE CITY OF RENTONt$ © 2
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9A 235 - 25500,
94,
6-0 SEPT -
December 4, 1981
Lyle Pickle
3719 North Park Street
Renton , Washington 98056
Dear Mr . Pickle :
On September 7 , 1981 , the Environmental Review Committee
issued a Final Declaration of Significance for the pro-
posed 188-unit complex known as the Isle Lake Mountain
View Condominiums . In a letter of September 24, 1981 ,
your engineer , Robert Bennett , indicated that an appeal
of the Declaration would be forthcoming. To date no
appeal has been received to process . Therefore , unless
you or your representative make arrangements by Decem-
ber 21 , 1981 , to meet with this department for consultant
selection and EIS preparation, your application will be
considered an expired file , and a new application must
be submitted .
If you have any questions , contact this department at.
235-2550 .
Very truly yours ,
g 7
Steve Munson
Assistant Planner
SM :wr
Bennet, PS' iNt-,
SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1031 • PUYALLUP,WA 98371
PUY: 845-8833 SEA: 838-3474
August 25, 1981 OF REA,'
PfCFNEb caL
AUG 26 1981
Mr. Roger J. Blaylock
Associate Planner
City of Renton 9itA.4,_
Municipal Building
200 Mill Ave. South LNG DES
Renton, Washington 98005
Re: Isle Lake Mountain View Condominiums 81-1903
Dear Mr. Blaylock:
This response is to your letter of August 6, 1981.
Item 1: The development of the site has a maximum of 200 units
and we propose to place 188 units on the property in four buildings.
The buildings will be constructed of concrete and will be very fire
resistant. The site will be well landscaped and blended into the
natural surroundings. The portion to the South will have a large buffer
strip consisting of the right-of-way which won't' be constricted for
vehicle traffic due to the excessive slope. The East portion of the
project has two (2) abutting right-of-ways with a ditch area between
them at various points. The area to be developed is Lincoln Avenue
which is the traveled roadway. The adjacent right-of-way to the site
is not opened and has a drainage course cutting through it. The
drainage area will be a blend of natural and professional landscaping.
The area will be enhanced with additional evergreens. The trees will be
the type of which are common to the Padific Northwest. The landscaping
on the site will be a shown on the plans. The intensity of development
will enhance the existing site and surrounding community.
Item 2: The property adjacent to the proposal has natural barriers
to the East, West and South. The West has a dropoff of about 30 feet to
a lower plateau with industrial businesses. This type of use is compatible
with the condominiums proposed. The southerly and easterly adjacent
right-of-way are also natural buffers. The area to the east is elevated
above the site and will not be damaged because of the natural vegetation.
A two story-stick development was laid out and the site was crowded with
100 units. As the height of the project increased, the ratio of open
space increased proportionately. The parking has a better layout and allows
50% to be covered. By using the building concept, the parking is covered
and there is a maximum of open space. Therefore, the adjacent property
is enhanced, rather than damaged.
1
Page 2 of 2
Item 3: The storm sewer construction will follow the natural
drainage pattern which exists at the freeway. We have made a complete
analysis of the May Creek Basin in this area and the contributing land.
The City has approved our design for filling the property down stream
at the outfall. We will design the on-site system with 100% retention
and require oil-water seperators at the outfalls. The offset storm
water will take its natural course along the easterly property line.
The driveways to the project will have culverts large enough to handle
a 100 year flood. All engineering will be examined and approved by theCityofRentonEngineer.
Item 4: The utilities will he installed at the developers expense.
Water will he extended to the North and intersect with the existing main.
This procedure will create a loop system and increase the reliability forfireflow. An adequate number of fire hydrants will be placed stra-
tegically on the site. The guard on the gate at night will help enchancethepoliceprotection. The method of landscaping will not allow the
project to be a throughfare. Therefore, a minimum of problems are expected
from the residents.
Item 5: The existing homes in the area will notice little view
blockage because the natural vegetation has already made a barrier which
will conceal the new buildings. The property to the east has a continous
slope up for the proposed project, this slope gives the existing residents
a distinct advantage in keeping their view.
Cordially,
C/ ./&
Robert A. Bennett, PLS
Project Manager
RAB/kdb
FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
Application No(s) : SA-061-81
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-069-81
Description of Proposal : Request for site
approval to allow
construction of 188
dwelling units (Condominiums) .
Proponent: PICKLE, LYLE
Location of Proposal: West side of Lincoln
Avenue N.E. , and
south of N.E. 44th
Street.
Lead Agency: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on September 2 , 1981 ,
following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning
Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
Richard Houghton David Clemens
Ronald Nelson Steve Munson
Roger Blaylock Donald Persson
Gary Norris Jeanette Samek
Mike Parness Ken Walls
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-069-81 are the following :
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
Steve Munson DATED: July 29, 1981
2) Applications : SA-061-81
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance:
Engineering Department, Traffic Engineering, and Utilities.
Recommendations for a declaration of significance:
Planning Department and Fire Department.
Request for more information: Police Department, Parks
Department and Building Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this development does have significant adverse impact on
the environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) .
This decision was made after review by the lead agency of
a complete environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance:
1 ) There will be significant impacts upon topography, water
courses, plant and animal life as a result of clearing
and grading of the subject site.
2) There will be significant impacts on population, number
of dwelling units, public services , and energy as a
result of the construction of the condominiums.
3) There will be impacts upon the aesthetic quality of
life and views in the developing residential neighbor-
hood.
A
4) There is insufficient information on the adequacy of
the water supply for this type of structure.
Signatures :
7?
Ronald G. Nelson D id R. Clemens, Acting
Building Director Planning Director
1 ,
Ri and C. Houghton, ting
Public Works Director
DATE OF PUBLICATION: September 7, 1981
EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: September 21 , 1981
Affidavit of- Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING ss.
Audrey DeJoie
being first duly sworn on
oath,deposes and says that IIh a is the Chief clerk of
THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a NOTICE OF
week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been ENVIRONMENTAL
for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, DETERMINATION
printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper Environmental Review
published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is Committee Renton,
now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the Washington
aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Daily Record The Environmental Re-
Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior view Committee (ERC) has
Court of the County in which it is published, to-wit,King County, issued a final declaration of
non-significance for the fol-
Washington.That the annexed is a Noti ce owing projects:
1 . C A R R A C C I O L 1, (7) duplex units (Cottage
JULIUS AND STELLA Lane)in a P-1 zone,fileCU-
ECF-074-81)—Application 072-81,and variance to per-
for rezone from G to L-1 to mit variable setback within
allow for future office, the required twenty foot(20')
as it was published in regular issues(and warehouse and material setback, file V-073-81; pro-not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period storage use, file R-069-81; perty located on the west
property located on the west side of Monroe Avenue N.E.
side of East Valley Road between Sir Cedric Con-
of 1
consecutive issues,commencing on the
approximately 320 feet dominiums and the Seventh
south of S.W. 16th Street. Day Adventist Church.
2. CASS, BRUCE (ECF- The Environmental Re-
7th day of September 19 81 ,and ending the
077-81) — Application for view Committee (ERC) has
building permit,file B-260,to also Issued a declaration of
construct a professional of- significance for the following
fice building; property lo- project:
day of 19 both dates cated on the southwest
1. PICKLE, LYLE (ISLEinclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- corner of rainier Ave.North LAKE MOUNTAIN VIEW)
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee and N.W.3rd Place.
3. COUNTPY HILLS (ECF-069-81)—vApplication
APARTMENTS (ECF-081- for site api oval, file SA-
charcharged for the foregoing 061-81, to allow construc-
tion
g g publication is the sum of $ which 81) — Application for
tion of 188 dwellingunithasbeenpaidinfullattherateofperfolioofonehundredwordsforthevariancefromSignOrdi-
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent nance to install sand blasted Condominiums to be known
insertion. as Isle Lake Mountain View
sign of 100 square feet, file
in B-1 zone;property LocatedB-262; property located on
the northwest corner of on the west side of Lincoln
111.... Ave. N.E. and south of N.E.Eagle Ridge Drive and Ben-
44th Street.son Road.
chief clerk The Environmental Re- Further information re-
view Committee has further garding these actions is av-
considered and modified ailable in the Planning De-
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7th day of their decision regarding the partment, Municipal Build-
following final declaration of ing, Renton, Washington,
September 81 non-significance with regard 235-2550. Any appeal of
19 to conditions: ERC act.ln must be filed
1. TEF:..A NORTHWEST with the Hearing ExaminerVietedHOMES, INC. (ECF-076- by September 21, 1981.
81) — Application for a Published in t:ie Daily Re-Notary Public in and r the S f Washington, Conditional Use Permit to cord Chronicle September
jCresiding
way6l
iRg unty.allow construction of seven 7, 1981. R6719
Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bil1281,effective June
9th, 1955.
Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by the newspapers of the State.
V.P.C.Form No.97 Rev.7-79
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of
non-significance for the following projects:
1. CARRACCIOLI, JULIUS AND STELLA (ECF-074-81)
Application for rezone from G to L-1 to allow for future office,
warehouse and material storage use, file R-069-81; property located
on the west side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south
of S.W. 16th Street.
2. CASS, BRUCE (ECF-077-81)
Application for building permit, file B-260, to construct a professional
office building; property located on the southwest corner of Rainier Ave.
North and -N.W. 3rd Place.
3. COUNTRY HILLS APARTMENTS (ECF-081-81)
Application for variance from Sign Ordinance to install sand blasted
sign of 100 square feet, file B-262; property located on the northwest
corner of Eagle Ridge Drive and Benson Road.
The Environmental Review Committee has further considered and modified their decision
regarding the following final declaration of non-significance with regard to condi-
tions:
1. TERRA NORTHWEST HOMES, INC. (ECF-076-81)
Application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of
seven (7) duplex units (Cottage Lane) in a P-1 zone, file CU-072-81,
and variance to permit variable setback within the required twenty
foot (20' ) setback, file V-073-81; property located on the west side
of Monroe Avenue N.E. between Sir Cedric Condominiums and the Seventh
Day Adventist Church.
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has also issued a declaration of signifi-
cance for the following project:
1. PICKLE, LYLE (ISLE LAKE MOUNTAIN VIEW) (ECF-069-81)
Application for site approval, file SA-061-81, to allow construction
of 188 dwelling unit condominiums to be known as Isle Lake Mountain
View in B-1 zone; property located on the west side of Lincoln Ave. N.E.
and south of N.E. 44th Street.
Further information regarding these actions is available in the Planning Department,
Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be
filed with the Hearing Examiner by September 21, 1981.
Published: September 7, 1981
NOTICE
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
PROPOSED ACTION REQUEST FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF 188 DWELLING UNIT CONDOMINIUM (SITE APPROVAL FILE
SA-061-81) ECF-069-81
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
EAST SIDE OF LINCOLN AVENUE N.E. AND SOUTH OF N.E. 44TH STREET
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE CE.R.C. ) AS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION, DOES DOES NOT, HAVE
A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRON-
MENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL` IMPACT STATEMENT, liWILL
CJWILL NOT, BE REQUIRED.
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M., SEPTF.MRH.R 9_1t981
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON 0PLANNCNGDEPARTMENT IpliOt235-2550
0
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 2, 1981
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. :
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
PENDING BUSINESS
RaMAC, INCORPORATED: (ECF-061-81 )
RENTON PROPERTIES, INC: (ECF-075-81 ) - B-258
OLD BUSINESS
ECF-069-81 PICKLE, LYLE
SA-061-81 To consider revised plans: Application
for site approval to allow construction
of 188 dwelling unit condominium
to be known as Isle Lake Mountain
View in B-1 zone; property located
on the west side of Lincoln Avenue
N.E. south of N.E. 44th Street.
ECF-020-81 BLENCOE, H.A. AND JANET
SA-017081 To consider revised plans : Application
V-019-81 for site approval to allow expansion
of medical/dental facility through
second floor addition and application
for variance from Parking and Loading
Ordinance regarding parking requirements;
property located at 138, 200, and
206 South 3rd Place.
NEW BUSINESS
ECF-077-81 CASS, BRUCE
B-260 Application for building permit
to construct professional office
building; property located on south
west corner of Rainier Avenue N.
and N.W. 3rd Place.
ECF-081-81 COUNTRY HILLS APARTMENTS
B-262 Application for variance from Sign
Ordinance to install sandblasted
cedar property identification sign
100 square feet) ; property located
at northwest corner of intersection
of Eagle Ridge Drive and Benson
Road.
10: . _ 1
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
ICOMMITTEEr
SEPTEMBER 2, 1 981 j, ',3, I
i Ie -A
I_
PICKLE, LYLEG
I . ' ,
IIL . \
I
1__ I I
40.
tri 1 . . W A
c La.
LAKE 1
i VII, ` ` WASHINGTON Mil la r
i AvVrigAirNarl b
k,... ..W34111.1"=ITAIIINe, . ''..-kli ,....,_64, ...--- . .t —..= - ra ' paiLTAce•
milkx ilt==g - 6...-11110 ela,.. 1 \ Web rill -Ea=
eigb' 1114 AN:11,-/i--;
11111 J
1 / illrfirCASS, BRYCE 11w11f/.
1 l z--). , ., 4111,11111Nlihelfgl, litstis ii L. i
1'..
0 '
1 1
r
tiq AO
BLENCOE, H.A. AND JANET . lu !
1
1161,, ,\
11101.----iitiidn.....„ „,..... ,.., -,
itPi
I
1 fir: p.mwill i 111
Na,„0,440-06,....4.110k 4\41.4 /
JI.,"ii COUNTRY HILLS APARTMENTS
1411faiii‘k ,
Ii- IMIL lirAI 1 E ,
it
1
1 (I i: ,
1,,
i
I SINVIIIIMEAPag ! ''''''
I ph *
MIR& k w°
Le
alio pm 13r\
1
v ., D1ri,uil
i I \
i
1 r F + i
C\.)!•! ,,
r----
1I 1- 1\
11
I
i I
i r r LAKE
1 C YOUNGS
i L A
B1neft I
SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1031 • PUYALLUP,WA 98371
PUY: 845-8833 SEA: 838-3474
August 25, 1981
Mr. Roger J. Blaylock
Associate Planner
City of Renton
Municipal Building
200 Mill Ave. South
Renton, Washington 98005
Re: Isle Lake Mountain View Condominiums 81-1903
Dear Mr. Blaylock:
This response is to your letter of August 6, 1981.
Item 1: The development of the site has a maximum of 200 units
and we propose to place 188 units on the property in four buildings.
The buildings will be constructed of concrete and will be very fire
resistant. The site will be well landscaped and blended into the
natural surroundings. The portion to the South will have a large buffer
strip consisting of the right-of-way which won't be constricted for
vehicle traffic due to the excessive slope. The East portion of the
project has two (2) abutting right-of-ways with a ditch area between
them at various points. The area to be developed is Lincoln Avenue
which is the traveled roadway. The adjacent right-of-way to the site
is not opened and has a drainage course cutting through it. The
drainage area will be a blend of natural and professional landscaping.
The area will be enhanced with additional evergreens. The trees will be
the type of which are common to the Padific Northwest. The landscaping
on the site will be a shown on the plans. The intensity of development
will enhance the existing site and surrounding community.
Item 2: The property adjacent to the proposal has natural barriers
to the East, West and South. The West has a dropoff of about 30 feet to
a lower plateau with industrial businesses. This type of use is compatible
with the condominiums proposed. The southerly and easterly adjacent
right-of-way are also natural buffers. The area to the east is elevated
above the site and will not be damaged because of the natural vegetation.
A two story-stick development was laid out and the site was crowded with
100 units. As the height of the project increased, the ratio of open
space increased proportionately. The parking has a better layout and allows
50% to be covered. By using the building concept, the parking is covered
and there is a maximum of open space. Therefore, the adjacent property
is enhanced, rather than damaged.
40
Page 2 of 2
Item 3: The storm sewer construction will follow the natural
drainage pattern which exists at the freeway. We have made a complete
analysis of the May Creek Basin in this area and the contributing land.
The City has approved our design for filling the property down stream
at the outfall. We will design the on-site system with 100% retention
and require oil-water seperators at the outfalls. The offset storm
water will take its natural course along the easterly property line.
The driveways to the project will have culverts large enough to handle
a 100 year. flood. All engineering will be examined and approved by the
City of Renton Engineer.
Item 4: The utilities will be installed at the developers expense.
Water will be extended to the North and intersect with the existing main.
This procedure will create a loop system and increase the reliability for
fire flow. An adequate number of fire hydrants will be placed stra-
tegically on the site. The guard on the gate at night will help enchance
the police protection. The method of landscaping will not allow the
project to be a throughfare. Therefore, a minimum of problems are expected
from the residents.
Item 5: The existing homes in the area will notice little view
blockage because the natural vegetation has already made a barrier which
will conceal the new buildings. The property to the east has a continous
slope up for the proposed project, this slope gives the existing residents
a distinct advantage in keeping their view.
Cordially,
n.;GC/d/&"-V-V74L.
Robert A. Bennett, PLS
Project Manager
RAB/kdb
Isle Lake Mountain View Condominiums
Pickle, Lyle
1 L. INI 1 \.J it YY / \ J1 1 II ru 6 i • 4 NE fN76St
nd vicinity
7."
Nast
Y I.
Z i
N
A Land of Destiny O Map a
f0ti o
N
o- S 106 SI..,, L4 ; Z NE 20 St
WI3r^c n.,.t rnd. gY,vQ `"•"`' Copyright 1981-—A1!Rights Reserved 9 W
z
Sc•1.--ADD,oa.
b
Z
p ®
evidot,
G, .,6r'Produced by i 11
Q
9.' Frank A. WUber__Auburn, Washington Z •i
1 <
is S1100020003000t
A•...•.64 N•.w iw1
1 1 YFPO a
c
li0p4iPlralI
O.
y`
Y -
1 • 1 , 1 1 d LAKE WASJlJNCTON
E4•Ft !VS01. *' t S NE a 12St P
Slant*City S 112 St _ _ . i «'.- .. S i -
tivsrd Limits s
A
t M .".MEM LE't i ,b' .« t,.
O j , 4raaUc r
St 11®L o
St r Q
4•11 w
11 d `.!
115 q .. -. e•..w..o.
NWIr
r
c N N I I.....0 NE
1•s
ti
S 116 St`o 4r n ,Ay1 ,
stl6 St d'5116 St 16 St ttL a! 1tc IL Nl.r-
e S i® St
Gll N H ©_
9 AIRCRAFT Z
t1 lie St
16PE 8 CS11BSt
manTJ e1
o< ' _
r '
c 12o StSQ
NaS,•
Y
n. 'j7 s r•7K ,p S120 Sr t/1 t.'fl'J t.:.:" \ ..• INDUSTRIAL AREA
yj
tit
Jtt a „ ?7 '
gyp1 a i
S127 Q
St
y
111
Z•
y
Q c
NW
t
1
t
ra r t c P 1 t.n
o ,° I. ..m .. i S 123 PLm 37 z _
Cr
S 124 SI % • 124 St Cr:-'- • . ,7a s, 6.12 H` ••P
N 6 St
NW 6St •
5175St S125S1 • rc
q•
71 +' NI a NW RFNTOrJ 111111 d
e ;
S
17PL S o
S
126 S St ' Munitloal `\ Z1`
J $127PL
5 ®lh QSr r12E tt ...i. .. N I a St I 4
Q •M•r.« / ..---,,,...,Sr
t`'' : e rk. -
I r S 179 Sr
r
rig vn 11® •®, tS • t,',.`
c•
7 115514164,,,a°•
1 130 St< NO,• • c • r
V V L•. \ g .'
F!
W watV• '
a
1 S131 S• Rd w r+ q .
NW Air meet Ww v
13J Sr.131 Cry+° _.•..:
i
o cN pi. ,,
0
N. S 133 s• S 7 0 n ^
io. :
1R®NSII .1 111 (0. rW ',.-A,,,,,,,
Black River
S 13S St mot, a ciorr 2 i i.
L p
S..
rry S 2 St S • <.:•. c..0
m, Pw 7 T L
Mel
p
to
3.W
3 r airi ' S 3 St `Cod+, /
Ian l"
In
p':.++
c.rH....:: . ©
waI ®®I•g /gl s a SlAli
leitTukwila 8 prc
6
vim c F• f c SG
e S1a3St •.
V.
y y` ?' ae _ St
Earinatonki143,°i `.`
s,u s•
Golf Course
St;
S1aa ,,^e., 1
W17St Wr St i
c
Msl,
6
t
Y J1 i
1 '
N N T. ` IENO
Ir. 147 St
4.
rOUNTY`\
ry Iw.vmW c S El i c iy:cJ,` '..
1.
ith II,
p51 I '°a CountrySStPARR \' J.
4 W
r•
y, t---Jfi• ••
u'
1 tSf cP Hills a
i >
w•r 157 _4 !Sit) ,0 2 •• g
S' G ad \% Thunder Hi l l ."
J . a // SW 16 St r H 1...
F.,^•, / `_S u ,.•i
i aw rC,
m
r $
151S,
StSaSt C i t S1".E16 r e _ ,.c,d i
1. -._.i 1 r" t I ., ; k s,<
t
v . st -1- . •vi
r
WoV81.4 •
for
t•i 11 L au C
ilk-
HofN
1(\
a
9 t
1Y.*
4 P•rlrw.v Rearm 1Ys,, ;SqG
co77i t.t 7
t:IN f, i Et 167'.•
S.
SOUIn t NikR r'\
Sy 6. S7] it rf.+
N .^ - ..-rE 163.1 c
l
t
S r,O t'IN4 MALL Riker Bird L T'. ; i
Q`r .._^
k 1'W Al
u
V.
zE ILL'.:pis •S •St N SE 1W St
v•nd., Bled T Pk <. i . .is 16s ' <
n
I
S Er 1p
1,0
T,K.
Inds
r. / •.
4• t'16 SE 166 St Y,
fM S S
R f s 7tS ,Ct 31` -. SF 1Ga
rtK..•. J 1
tJ )...• J
11 to 'n •^ Sr
PLAZA t
iQ i
1 TUKWILA •, j i i SE 170 St t70 s. .
sW 3r st
y
O C O i
t 14=
1 f 1 tr a SE n71s
MmYi r A1.1. i:-i+4•:1ti•AI4:4;:C."' -T!:4 11 ••II.. 4..
i'
1kIil7. _
I
60.0sTrzoc,Ilic).m ..PLA N.J.-_. .. . _ , __ .
Couistry Hilt -.'‘ .'"
1,k.1-
Tyr,EFAcae.s • c•JVN LD LIR-..GO 17A-LIApartmentsrt-o25. Mom_ Ft - leery_ MED_13 N---
f j : -
TT——4—— —
7. — '----
r I1, , TI
II i
1 I I
iIII
I l I Z X C. .•.xIo'LN-I'NATED. cEpr_ I I I
I
j
6
I I I III
s' I I I I I IiII -I I
I
I I I .1 I I
I1 II I1
I I
I I i i t L
I .
i I \I I I 1 II
2"y 6"X S
r
o-Po2? (3 vJ soz\dls i elLvE_ Z ,X2,• e--or'Porz_-r
bo urn r5ratnas.;._"
MaT. T=vg=--.
F t zETYJA:L1ISr :.
XIST IJC-t5]G/Z IOJ..
A
i '
I
1 i
Country Hills Apartments
G.EDAQ _`-MINGLE. gc F
z
S.
n
t!
x
a
2y,Q.g LAP 5-1RiF
I
cn I k..:(E..e.
w
75
Yi.
rt r
cn
III' i 1
t%.l 1 I 1 . 1 i °i
1.0.• .I Allilibt
I. ! 04
1 1 LI l 1 1 1 pl a
I I
vtycouccaTC
I,
Gtv5.7r reocric..3 (LA., --- - --
M ,I•i1
III '
1 I
SC4 LE_ 5/6 = 1 1
I
Co ,12oCOON 1-L4 J
O
rt
M ..t'AL_ .PLA -
1-..
m
b
n 40
ice
rt r`',. ME.-r4L Tue.•f cL«
N
111 l4,,!
t
1 t.l
1 tz-
1 ti i
1 U1 —
OF
0 THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
0 alum BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
A
co- 235- 2550
0,
9gTED SEPS
O
MEMORANDUM
August 27 , 1981
TO : Environmental Review Committee
FROM : Roger Blaylock
Planning Department
RE : ISLE LAKE MOUNTAIN VIEW CONDOMINIUMS (PICKLE)
The attached material is in response to our request
for further information . As we will be reviewing the
matim•r again at our next ERC meeting on September 2nd,
smommi.mgai - ksxrwar,ded to you now-, for... y9
Attachments
Note : Please return all plans . Thank you .
venneff PS(&' E
SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1031 • PUYALLUP,WA 98371
PUY: 845-8833 SEA: 838-3474
OF R FNT
August 25, 1981 C,'D a
143G
9R 1991
Mr. Roger J. Blaylock
Associate Planner 9
N P .
City of Renton NG D1 .
Municipal Building
200 Mill Ave. South
Renton, Washington 98005
Re: Isle Lake Mountain View Condominiums 81-1903
Dear Mr. Blaylock:
This response is to your letter of August 6, 1981.
Item 1: The development of the site has a maximum of 200 units
and we propose to place 188 units on the property in four buildings.
The buildings will be constructed of concrete and will be very fire
resistant. The site will be well landscaped and blended into the
natural surroundings. The portion to the South will have a large buffer
strip consisting of the right-of-way which wont-Ube constricted for
vehicle traffic due to the excessive slope. The East portion of the
project has two (2) abutting right-of-ways with a ditch area between
them at various points. The area to be developed is Lincoln Avenue
which is the traveled roadway. The adjacent right-of-way to the site
is not opened and has a drainage course cutting through it. The
drainage area will be a blend of natural and professional landscaping.
The area will be enhanced with additional evergreens. The trees will be
the type of which are common to the Padific Northwest. The landscaping
on the site will be a shown on the plans. The intensity of development
will enhance the existing site and surrounding community.
Item 2: The property adjacent to the proposal has natural barriers
to the East, West and South. The West has a dropoff of about 30 feet to
a lower plateau with industrial businesses. This type of use is compatible
with the condominiums proposed. The southerly and easterly adjacent
right-of-way are also natural buffers. The area to the east is elevated
above the site and will not be damaged because of the natural vegetation.
A two story-stick development was laid out and the site was crowded with
100 units. As the height of the project increased, the ratio of open
space increased proportionately. The parking has a better layout and allows
50% to be covered. By using the building concept, the parking is covered
and there is a maximum of open space. Therefore, the adjacent property
is enhanced, rather than damaged.
Page 2 of 2
Item 3: The storm sewer construction will follow the natural
drainage pattern which exists at the freeway. We have made a complete
analysis of the May Creek Basin in this area and the contributing land.
The City has approved our design for filling the property down stream
at the outfall. We will design the on-site system with 100% retention
and require oil-water seperators at the outfalls. The offset storm
water will take its natural course along the easterly property line.
The driveways to the project will have culverts large enough to handle
a 100 year flood. All engineering will be examined and approved by the
City of Renton Engineer.
Item 4: The utilities will be installed at the developers expense.
Water will be extended to the North and intersect with the existing main.
This procedure will create a loop system and increase the reliability for
fire flow. An adequate number of fire hydrants will be placed stra-
tegically on the site. The guard on the gate at night will help enchance
the police protection. The method of landscaping will not allow the
project to be a throughfare. Therefore, a minimum of problems are expected
from the residents.
Item 5: The existing homes in the area will notice little view
blockage because the natural vegetation has already made a barrier which
will conceal the new buildings. The property to the east has a continous
slope up for the proposed project, this slope gives the existing residents
a distinct advantage in keeping their view.
Cordially,
4‘-'74d
Robert A. Bennett, PLS
Project Manager
RAB/kdb
NOTICE
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
PROPOSED ACTION PROPOSED DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
REGARDING APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 188
DWELLING UNIT CONDOMINIUM ( ISLE LAKE MOUNTAIN VIEW) IN B-1 ZONE
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
WEST SW OF IINCOIN AVFNUF N . E. SOUTH OF N. E. 44TH STRFFT
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE t E.R.C. ) AS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION, DOES DOES NOT HAVE
A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRON-
MENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, fy14/ILL
CJWILL NOT, BE REQUIRED.
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M.,AUGUST 24, t981
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
235-2550
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATIO'
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING ss.
Michele Roe being first duly sworn on
oath,deposes and says%at she is the Ct1ief Mark of
THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a
week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been
for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,
printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper
published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is
now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the
aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record
Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County,
NOTICE OF
Washington.That the annexed is a.....Notice R66.77 ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
as it was published in regular issues(and
The Environmental Re-
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period
view Committee (ERC) has
issued a proposed declara-
tion of significance for the
following project:
of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the LYLE PICKLE (ECF-
069-81)
l day of August Application for site ap-
proval file SA-061-81,to
allow construction of 188
dwelling unit con-
dominium to be known
day of 19 ,both dates as Isle Lake Mountain
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-View in B-1 zone;proper-
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ty located on the west
side of Lincoln Avenue
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $14•99 which
N.E. south of N.E. 44th
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the
Street.
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words_for each subsequent Further information re
insertion. garding this action is avail-
able in the Planning Depart-
ment, Municipal Building,
Renton, Wasington, 235-
2550. Any appeal of ERC
action must be filed with the
Chief....Clerk Hearing Examiner by Au-
gust 24, 1981.
P Da Re-
Subscribed and sworn to before me thiscord hrod i
l
theAugusty 10,12 day of Chronicle 10,
1981. R6677
X...Augu,st 19....61
Notary Pub is in a for the State of Washington,
residing at 41111111g:Ring County.
Federal Way. I
Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June
9th, 1955.
Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by the newspapers of the State.
V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a proposed
declaration of significance for the following project :
LYLE PICKLE (ECF-069-81)
Application for site approval , file SA-061-81 , to
allow construction of 188 dwelling unit condominium
to be known as Isle Lake Mountain View in B-1 zone ;
property located on the west side of Lincoln Avenue
N .E . south of N. E. 44th Street
Further information regarding this action is available in the
Planning Department , Municipal Building, Renton, Washington ,
235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the
Hearing Examiner by August 24 , 1981 .
Published : August 10 , 1981
PROPOSED DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
Application Noss) : SA-061-81
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-069-81
Description of Proposal: Request to construct
188-unit condominium
project.
Proponent: PICKLE, LYLE
Location of Proposal: West side of Lincoln
Avenue N. E. , south
of N.E. 44th Street.
Lead Agency: Renton Planning Department
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on July 29, 1981 , and
August 5, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock
of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted
from:
David Clemens Ronald Nelson
Richard Houghton Roger Blaylock
Steve Munson Gary Norris
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-069-81 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
Steve Munson DATED: July 29, 1981
2) Applications : SA-061-81
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance:
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering Division
Recommendation for a declaration of significance:
Planning Department
Request for more information:
Police Department
Parks and Recreation Department
Building Department
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this development does have significant adverse impact on
the environment. An EIS may be required under RCW
43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by
the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and
other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for proposed declaration of environmental significance:
1 ) There will be significant impacts upon topography, water
courses, plant and animal life as a result of clearing
and grading of the subject site.
2) There will be significant impacts on population, number
of dwelling units, public services, and energy as a
result of the construction of the condominiums.
3) There will be impacts upon the aesthetic quality of
life and views in the developing residential neighbor-
hood.
4) There is insufficient information on the adequacy of
the water supply for this type of structure.
PROPOSED DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE
APPLICATION: SA-061-81 ; LYLE PICKLE
PAGE TWO
Measures, if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate
the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead
agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and
issue a declaration of non-significance.
1 ) Mitigation of the intensity of the proposal upon adjacent
land uses through a) Redesign of the buildings or site
plan, b) by reduction in density, or c) buffering of
adjacent land uses.
2) Mitigation of storm water runoff by meeting the design
criteria of . 1 cubic feet per second per acre and 25-year
storm water storage supported by engineering calculations.
3) Mitigation of impacts to public services, particularly
police and fire.
Signatures:
Ite
schard C. H ughto Acting Ronald G. Nelson
ubli orks Direc or Building Director
2/
1/-3
vid R: Clemens
Acting Planning Director
DATE OF PUBLICATION: August 10, 1981
EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: August 24 , 1981
OF RE,
y THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
NA
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
4 0' 235- 2550
0,
9gT
O
eqs
SEPT,
140
August 6, 1981
Mr. Lyle Pickle
3719 North Park Street
Renton , Washington 98055
RE: ISLE LAKE MOUNTAIN VIEW CONDOMINIUMS
Dear Mr. Pickle:
The Environmental Reveiw Committee has considered the
information that you have submitted concerning your proposed
188 unit condominium complex and found that there are signifi-
cant questions concerning (1) scale and intensity, (2) the
environmental sensitiviity of the proposal in relationship to
adjacent landuses, (3) storm water drainage in a designated
critical storm water drainage basin, (4) the ability and
cost of public services particularly police and fire, and
5) view blockage as a result of the project . Therefore,
they have issued a Proposed Declaration of Significance.
This gives you the opportunity to evaluate the areas of
concern and propose mitigating measures by August 25th to
provide them with• enough information to make a final
determination on September 2, 1981.
Unless you can provide sufficient information on relieving
the concerns noted above, the Committee will issue a final
declaration of significance on September 2nd. Upon issuance
of the final declaration, or upon your concurrence in the
preparation of an environmental impact statement , we will
proceed to consultant selection (see attached) . If you
disagree with the Committee' s final declaration, you may
wish to consider an appeal to the Hearing Examiner.
If I can be of any further assistence, please contact me
at 235-2550.
Sincerly,
Roger J. Blaylo k
Associate Planner
Revision 3/1981 7/2318i
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: sI TE AOU sA- o fr9l) 4rfliormi tS%aA lo ce,ft/rve/
q-'b,df. , /89a fI(j 7 0t1'ost/sif1JF pre3et+
Location:w t;1e he ti A . Ng-so 1i; Q[ HE 4/vox?.
Applicant: PckIi Lyle
Public Works Department
ElEngi , -ering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: "f'z c'igi
D T' .ffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 84 1Wge
k V lities Eng. Division
ng ire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
Others:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON
D $
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: "mil C
Approved Approved with Conditions EKt Approved
2//SI G 2e/6 7 '''7
DATE: 4z/4K
Signature of Director or Autho 'zed Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: UTiuTY
Approved a4proved with Conditions ONot Approved
jpe_ 7tAsia4- 41a.
2Cr acPr NA Nor S7kTCo IAAJOT Fine Ftoi.J IS 2E k/ eo
DATE: 10410 •
Signature o irector or Authorized Representative
Revision 3/1981
brig A.I.) Die e
PL, LA
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1 G
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEETrikA
App 'cation : S/1 /4/441) Piek, 610,1404
Location: w.s jde cofi _Av_e /YE se& ?LA Qrtc/ir7P&c:s./•
Applicant: R'ekl<< Lyle.
IQ:Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department R e' I n i
Parks Department8/Building Department
Police Department S13/ /S
Others:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON
4L3/81
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 25.1,
7
Approved Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved
l/40 y-a GKa-y,•es 1v 6...Q as . -ivy G r. / --C4Li w.J(s
Z) / e, ,T. Q s !mod ca.-A.( vc's
U _ _ /
all ,6lZ Ce a "7-
DATE: 7/3/(
Signature of Director or Aut on ed Represe tative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved ['Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Revision 3/1981 7/23f9/
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: s O : S. a• 04- r 1 t
et II"hl t 1$-ult reI Js.ixi(J*. pre3et+
Location:w_sd 1/Ac_ i A . Seimi ere A/ 4,90ST
Applicant: Pickle, Lyle
Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 7f2 1/$/
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: O etg/
D Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Par . Department
Iptilding Department
IN Police Department
Others:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE
Approved 0 Approved with Conditions JNot Approved
SEE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET.
1 -(__
DATE:7/28/81
Signature otfi'Di rector or utiori zed Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
ision 3/1981 "7/23` V,
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: SITE i i°/AovnC. (R - 1-g) 4t p tolissjlh 1j Ge trig
Q v1lt. ! 199-usk j icomio inivw+ pre3.e1-
Location:W.64p de 4bite&tt AV. A/ sooW ete A/F 4/4/te,
Applicant: PjckIe1 Lyle
TO : Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 6712 7/2/
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 10 00f
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
uilding Department
Police Department
Others:_
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
SAO)/
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved Approved with Conditions Rjlot Approved
ct. C,Lam^P
C DATE: 72_
Signatur Director or Authorized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Revision 3/1981 7/23/e/
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: S/re /P/'RQL4(.„ _(S o i.ei) 4 r form Sss.A 4 ealtstwel
Q i!-bllt_ 1$S-yam' to 1,(t,.A preied'
Location: j11lt h Yo SAudke E 99t I V
Applicant: f'jclete, Lyle
TO:public Works Department
E ineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: f'",Z g/
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: S/F effr/
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
Others:_
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON
gfioj ll
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7 / / L/7,70-) 7-1/
Approved pproved with Conditions Not Approved
T"v,e,c 4 t l.vL p Nc,0 Ue.,tti,'_1.. 'S 0-7` E„? V 11"c czi. ..._
du bS , 0 ui-1ers ,icie. 4 aQkrs .v,,..d S pe7 hie7 ?lam f
by.,DATE: VWSignatureofDirectororAuthorizedRepresenttive
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved ['Approved with Conditions Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Revision 3/1981 7/23/45)/
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: Sire Ap/AOI/ e.., tsfi- OI"8l) r pots/D SS/o s j ce i1,4
a. -1jut optifejohnthadJAK praiet+
Location:w t:1, 6 htcstipA.o Ax sew se /VF 4,941:0'
Applicant: P441 , le
12:Public orks Department
ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: "7l24rf ei
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 81m eee
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
El Others:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON
f/Of$I
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved Approved withh Conditions ElNot Approved
l4 d o /yam A/6 eld S f
b`^-- 0 l C-F-S/j1G
frt,v,e4
DATE:
Signature of Director or uthorized Representative
7/?-947
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Date circulate 7/z3/12/ Comma.. ..s due : ? ZS '/
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEB SHEET
ECF - 8t
APPLICATION No (s ) . SDI—o6/—j
PROPONENT : Pt'c (e, L! /e
PROJECT TITLE :
r
Brief Description of Pro ject : Tie Gyp ked1/isfrYSint T4EINSIrvdr71-
4i4_ 19 S-untie.E,eta. / •10 •61.c,•k
gideLOCATION : eitt; j. AV SOVet` Of /vE' v''
SITE AREA : t S, aVdte.es BUILDING AREA (gross ) ...
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (90 :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :1/
3 ) Water & water courses : V/
4 ) Plant life :
5 )' Animal life :c_/
6 ) Noise : b,
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :kJ--
14 ) Public services :F/
15 ) Energy : ci
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics : t/
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : NSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : litle : LEA0 4- - $PgC. ,
Date : 0040
FORM: ERC-06
1
Date circu1.: 7/z3/9/ Costs due : Z 45/
ENVIRONMENTAL CIiECfIYEIST REVIEd SHEET
ECF - o _ el_
APPLICATION No ( s ) . 5A 04,-i
PROPONENT :_PjAle) L ( . _
PROJECT TITLE : SITE PpPQa01.4-
Brief Description of Project : 7Aecep/ie f "9)00,0 7/Lti,gc7 'p i_
a 414 _ I l4LiflIV$ /$r.fftcu?td..fslit 0 flinga 0tJt% Of NE- 549 4.5'e`
SITE AREA : t S, al/etc/Peg !1l1ILDING AREA (gross ) •"""""
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ..-...-_
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life : 7
5 )' Animal life : v
6) Noise :
7 ) Eight & glare :_
R ) Land Use ; nurthc rrteyt `--I l .E'rtrhrw
east : Sc... 4
I`.,.....,,„
79 iruivapit„e0,4
south :
tt
west :
Land use conflicts :1 f•N skit'
View obstruction : e
9 ) Natural resources : II10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
v
12 ) Number of Dwellings :I J'
13 ) Trip ends ( I TE ) : Q$ obris eig9u,u,1,x
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : I 4,0•
00°1
1 > ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
i ) Aesthetics
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology /history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendat ion : DNSI_ DOS 1/ More Information
Reviewed by :64eYe Anulil D l 'tie : s
ion__
Date : q1 v1
FOFN: ERC-ob
Date circulate 23 12/ Comme s due :7 zO,ENVIRONMENTAL CfiECIKLIST RE{9IEfI SHEET
ECF - O - SL
APPLICATION No ( s ) . SA—o6I—/
PROPONENT : Pi-dc lei Lyk____
PROJECT TITLE : SITE 0V+4..
Brief Description of Project : Vecyjpiiedied/fropagdrie l teams 471—
40 t I ,A___ ‘ 'ft • ,.., : 'doe f or. 14,./046'46/k
LOCATION :W3/644 illflateetti AV0. S 0 elk of Ale" V4'. .Srt
SITE AREA:
t S. 3Ydtc•rs RUILDING AREA (gross ) "'"-
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : 1
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 )' Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources : 1
c
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
i
d ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS : Q•,a-.--- N az 3 ,. c '
E,, t. £ aL.c....74....- P.A....._ a,.E..-._ 7a._A. Cr-*
1 ',._.
L}MCA
1 a... lit_,• cu-.-'.tot..-'-) .:.,., ;:--1-, M O .1 ----. 4-a- u1-Q- o
e-- .w..a.. a- A-4- r4 a ...A,-*....A,-*. ...9 r•-
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : , o .F t. 1itle :c; ca_ bf
Date : r2V7/
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulate 7/23/9/ Comme,,,.,, due : 7 Z ,4/
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REIIIEU SHEET
F - 000 - $
APPLICATION No (s ) . 5fl O i—B(
PROPONENT : Fiche, Lyle
PROJECT TITLE : S/TE Appg0(014.
Brief Description of Project : Thettp ,•Rius 11eis'1 ts¢
Q, 414. I99bPhfcr.J.aiisttvasr ,sr.1ee A*. Il/0 'ts.Ce
LOCATION :W. j t el Lae fit% AV SOd1 of APEyy- 3t
SITE AREA :S 1VdeciPes BUILDING AREA (gross ) '"'"!
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (% ) : --
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 )' Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources : I
r
y
10 ) Risk of upset : 1/
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : 5I DOS More Information
1
Reviewed b YCl 1 i t 1 e : —- tt'j; _1/S"C-C 2W
Date : 7/79 / /
FORM: ERC-06
41i)11Ik
Date circulated : /Z.3/ 2r Comments due : 7 Z A '/
ENVIRONIMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 09 - at_
APPLICATION No (s ) . 5,q o61-pj
PROPONENT : P.'c1e L (eY
PROJECT TITLE : 411TF teDoug _
Brief Description of Project ; eettp 'epod r.esei v 4msielpi74-
pi. qs6 id"_ Ig°fhlitile g.se • e e Milo 6e. IC,Ve
LOCATION :W..SIQe dettdiell,,AyQ., S0det% of AVE-Veil. 5 . -
SITE AREA : i S, 3y4tesPts BUILDING AREA (gross ) ' —'--
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : .•
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
I N,FO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset : X
11 ) Population/Employment : x +
12 ) Number of Dwellings
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : I X
15 ) Energy : X
16 ) Utilities : X
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : $NSI DOS More Information x
Reviewed by : r C /. .Ar..-r_____-- Title : C,V2(- 6 IjV ._
Date :A-.?-.) 4
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulate Z,3 8/ Commit due : 7/42t $10140'
ENVIRONPIENTAL CHECKLIST RE19IEd SHEET
ECF - 8u_
APPLICATION No (s ) . S/ O6/-J
PROPONENT : Pt'c (e, Ly(e
PROJECT TITLE : S1TF o p oy 11.
Brief Description of Project : 71ecypkemodrs,/Stl 14&mg Tl pi'
a b/4_ ig gPit'altC iits r'vn rl 'e a or. M lr •4 f g,•6 k
SITE AREA : y" S: 'ayicreS BUILDING AREA (gross) "'""'
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :-_ I )(
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : x
3 ) Water water courses : X
4 ) Plant life :
5 )' Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light h glare : X
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :x
12 ) Number of Dwellings :X
13) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy : X
16) Utilities :
17 ) Human health:
18) Aesthetics : X
19 ) Recreation : C
20) Archeology/history :Xe
COMMENTS :
ram c S i h en('i 7 C., ( S'/-rv,, q mot'•.-.mac_
owx.64 are .e.- A- ,r O. / C-fS/ - wi 257r 57 7,c___
Recommendation : DNGI DOS More Infornmat. ion _
Reviewed by : litle :
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulate l
I
ZAA I Comme s due : 7 ZA Rie
1=X{9IROINHENTAL CIIECICLIST REVIfEM SHEET
ECF - 09 - $/
APPLICATION No (s ) . 514-O6/-ei
PROPONENT : Pc1e., tide
PROJECT TITLE : S/TE A o
Brief Description of Project : Vecyp/irmeropS00 Aigaviocsire#74-
0. ghat_ /9 u,,. 4 e*I<wi viw 16 a 'e e 7F ip+ Nit Js' exise
LOCATION :W.$IIt Of Li lte eth AV @.+ S 0 ti of /VC yyS'
SITE AREA : * S. aVOC 'rtt BUILDING AREA (gross ) 4""'""'
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ..--
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : A,l-
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 1./-
3 ) Water & water courses : t---
4 ) Plant life :
5 )' Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north:
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : I X / 3i 2 ve4,ck. 7 AS
traffic impacts : gXc.742 /
14 ) Public services : I
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17) Human health:
18) Aesthetics :
19) Recreation : i/
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI I/DOS More Information__
Reviewed by 7 itle . k
Date : 7/gV
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulate Z 3/Q/ Comm" due : V4Z01/ENVIROINMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
C C F -
APPLICATION No (s ) . 5j0tFo i—j
PROPONENT : P,dcle, Lyle
PROJECT TITLE : SACAinestatftv
Brief Description of Project : ilegyAkedwierops''l Writs •71 '
OIL af. IR ihifte.feinetti i set,"It fife'e! AI.. f 1.4'ed.c '
J
LOCATION :W314 .f 1m€e , sa-, of /EVern! e
SITE AREA : * S. 37dtcPlS BUILDING AREA (gross ) 4""'""
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (a) : .
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 )1 Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
ram_ XXX
14 ) Public services :
xxxx
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Due to this projects location at the North edge of the City
Limits the police dept. will have a response time problem. The site also
has traffic impacts that should be addressed, however with the limited info. that
was supplied with the application more information is needed to properly evaluate
the application. What is the developed going to do to offset the impact on
POLICE SERVICES?
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information xxx
Reviewed by : litle :
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
JULY 29 , 1981
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. :
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
PENDING BUSINESS :
HIGHLAND VILLAGE, LINCOLN PROPERTIES : (ECF-053-81)
RaMAC, INCORPORATED ; (ECF-061-81)
STIRSKEY HOLDINGS, LTD. : (ECF-062-81)
NEW BUSINESS :
ECF-069-81 LYLE PICKLE
SA-061-81 Application for site approval to allow
construction of 188 dwelling unit condo-
minium to be known as Isle Lake Mountain
View in B-1 zone; property located on
the west side of Lincoln Ave. N .E .
south of N .E. 44th Street
J
1
14 1 i j I
Ii. ,
r ;
1
1
ENVIRONMENTAL libc
REVIEW COMMITTEE I C I
JULY 29, 1981
f' 4
f / -LYLE PICKLE
L__ ....
I,
ss::.,. - limmi"i. ,v,
e
N I
is LAKE \\ , • j
1liii
WASHINGTON 7.
ma AML•16...„4:1.
r 11 =- culliFF.. f- ='
Se VallellaiN \\soe.G ( 111 PA w 1110airifill-- 4 -
t-
VaillittO 1111 ilia .\ : I I "MIMI •t
ttlevidqqiirei mi-it \ \ lio-:,le wikti 1 1-1-1 -,
1
4611. • 11
i
v„iiiimirva----
ki - .
4
16,,,z........ao usi follow& 4.--
1010111&-alliftillittfitiPIOLill t '
le , --C'.? ' NrulaWill. Min MOW''----'1! ..\.• !k-: 1 wil' i'
0,. ir, 1. 1 :::1
ii\Iv. i.
r. mow- 1
1-\ in r III 1
II\ .r 1
r.
1011-114 'i .
4t,-`,..` ,_.,11111111 ' •-\ UV torli 1 7 111
i1
Hialgi- 4k. . - I
1."11.1.1.11arz A. .1 Aw- . -
41 —1 giismiimming. i '....7.,'•,,,
b's46; '
i
1iiri .!p
millt
SUP 1IN ..., .
ridil
r_.., je, I
1 r 1
LAK1
4
ill ' '''''''' - -1
L
1
l
LAKE
Win - 9,O3
CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION
SITE APPROVAL
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
File No. SA- 062/ - k/ Filing Date 7-4i - X/
Application Fee $ Receipt No .9 0 y 7
Environmental Review Fee $
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1 . Name Lyle Pickle Phone 255-7679
Address 3719 Park Street North Renton 98055
2 . Property location North City limits Renton; East 405 Freeway
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
Lots 5 and 8 of clock 2 and lots 1 and 2 of Block 3 of C.n. 'lillmans Lake
Washington, Garden of Eden Division 7 together with vacated city street; Less
the South 40 feet of said lots
4 . Number of acres or square feet 232,741 SF(5.34) Ac. Present zoning B-1
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Units to be sold as
condominiums
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 '
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . . . 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept.
Rev, 1-77
teceipt #
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NAME DATE
PROJECT & LOCATION 7-- /. ./ / `))^' /, r.'r '/ "•
Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total
Environmental Checklist
Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee
TOTAL FEES
Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor.
Thank vou.
AFFIDAVIT
I , Lyle Pickle being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and typrir Lion
herewith submitted are in all respects true and corre O . ' of
my knowledge and belief . StON F•,9
Subscribed and sworn before me
01I O /?)..•.
this day of d(JLU 19 /
0.p PUB OC`l,:Z
Notary Public in and for the State of zty,,, •.T
5 1..•,`O
Washington, residing at Puyallup df' vyAsov.
01. 46(..-e-i Ad/z.,, ,-
Name of No ary Public) na ure of Owner
333 . 22- Ail°
c t A/-GJ . 3719 Park
Address) Address)
Penton 4'n 98055
City) State)
255-7679
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received 19 By :
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
14 A.
ITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON O
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM aECEIUcD )‘()\
JUL 15 1981
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' 9,,
Application No. S.q - ('(D - GDEPP
Environmental Checklist No. FCF - C(c9- ''/
PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date:
Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
EjDeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent Lyle Pic!1 e
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
3719 Park Street North Renton, Washington 98055 255-7y7q
3. Date Checklist submitted
4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton planning, fire Department,Fn7'neering
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
Isle Lake "".ountain View
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
see attached
A, r
1 v
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
See attached
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
The project will be completed in two (2) years .
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local--including rezones) :
See attached
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain:
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes , explain :
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
No
II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
YES MAYBE T -
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X
unique geologic or physical features?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: See attached
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in :
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors? V
YES MBE NO
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate , either locally or X
regionally?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
See attached
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
X
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? t
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria,
or other substances into the ground waters?X
YES MAYBE NO
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X
M/—for public water supplies?YES E NS
Explanation:
See attached
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
X
YET- MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or X
endangered species of flora?YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or '
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X
species?
YES MAYBE iO
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
YE MAYBE
X
S
Explanation:
See attached
4-
5) Fauna. dill the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? v
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: See attached
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: See attached
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare? YE— MAYBE 57—
Explanation:
See attached
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
See attached
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including ,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
7—ES M YBE NO
Explanation: See attached
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
X
of an area?
VET- MBE WU—
Explanation:See attached
PIM
5-
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or X
create a demand for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
See attached
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in :
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Y
YES MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
See attached
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Police protection?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services? X '
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
See attached
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
See attached
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
a) Power or natural gas?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Communications systems?
Y`?ES MAYBE NO
c) Water?
YES MAYBE NO
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage? v
YES MAYBE NO
f) Solid waste and disposal? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
See attached
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
YES 4717 NO
Explanation:
See no. 10
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
See attached
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
See attached
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:sgifeilf4411:g111117V
igned
name prints r
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
1/5
6) The total site is 5.34 acres . The road pattern will loop throughout the
project allowing parking to be convenient to all buildings . The project will
have City of Renton water and sewer. The fronting road is to be constructed
to the city of Renton standards. The storm sewer will be approved by the City
of Renton. The development will have/88units in 4- buildings. There will be
a mix of one, two and three bedroom units. All of the design and documents
will be in accordance with the rules and regulations of the City of Renton.
There will be two entrances which front on NE 40th. Each unit will allow a
small area for personal up keep. Each individual unit will have the use of
the recreation pool , tennis courts and the jogging trails.
7) The project site is located at the north portion of the city limits in the
area knoiJn a5 AZIY G'R66K.
The property slopes to the west and north from the existing road. The fronting
road will have a 6 to 8% slope.
The site has B-/ zoning. The site area will allow the 2DO units .
The site has an existing well which has a 15 foot pressime. Sand has been
taken from the site in the past years . The sand was sold and hog fuel was
brought back in and stock piled. There are no structures or development on
the site. A water main is on the south line of the project.
An existing apartment complex is located about 400 feet northeast in King
County.
9) Planning approval ; Engineering approval , building permits, disposal site
permits, City of Renton water and sewer permits, hydraulic project approvals,
right of way construction permit.
B-la) Excavation of approximately 9,000 cubic yards of earth will occur in the
area on the total site. The total site needed to be graded and all material
will stay on site except for any unsuitable. landscaping and berm areas will be
built from onsite cut material . All of the on site 9ra,2 . should not create a
change in geologic substructures . Clay may be encountered in some areas which
will be removed and replaced with pit run.
b) There will be grading on the project site that will compact road subgrades
and parking areas . Soil will be removed on site from one location to another.
The top soil will be removed and stockpiled before grading can be accomplished.
There will be some clearing of brush and small alders . Some of the open space
will be regraded in the recreation area.
c) The topography on site will change under control of approved engineering
plans. There are plans to cut roads, fill low areas and landscape building sites .
The City of Renton has rules and regulations for grading and excavation control
which shall be complied with.
d) The site area has been a sand pit in the past. The taking of material has
ceased and has not reoccured for many years . The earth work on the project
will not modify any unique geologic features .
e) With the removal of some vegetation and placement of surfaces by construction
of both buildings and roads there will be an increased potential of erosion.
The City of Renton controls the site drainage and will prevent erosion. The
city requires that a drainage plan be accompanied by a grading plan.
2a) The work on the site with heavy equipement will have a short term
localized effect, as to air quality. Automoble traffice from the residents
2/5
in the newly created dwelling will have an effect on air quality but federal
laws are striving for increased clean air control on all automobles . The
emissions from the home heating will be at a minimum due to electrical heat.
b) The automob?u traffic may cause a slight long term increase of emissions
to the general area due to exhaust.
3a) The ultimate destination of the runoff from the site will be Lake
Washington. The location of Lake Washington is directly to the west. The
water from the site will not contribute to a surface stream or change the
direction of flow. The water of Lake Washington out lets into Lake Union
and then to Puget Sound.
b) The absorption rate will change on the site due to the impervious surface
such as roads parking area, roofs, and sidewalks . The landscaped areas will
change the rate to a slight degree. Through City of Renton Drainage Control
the onsite erosion control ordinance the new rate of run off will be
controlled during the time of construction and after completion. Therefore
the surface water runoff will be handled in an approved mannor.
c) There should be no change in the flow if flood waters. The erosion
control plan will not allow water to leave the site at an excellerated
rate from the sites original condition. The lake which is the ultimate
destination does not have a flooding flow action.
d) The flow of surface water will remain the same, due to the erosion and
sedimentation control plan.
e) The bulk of the area may contain some contaminates which may be absorbed
through the surface and reach the ground water table. Contaminates during
construction may be dust and possibly materials from the operation of
construction equipement. there will not be an uncontrollable discharge of
materials or water into any body of water. There will be a temporary
erosion control plan in force to allow the destribution to be effective.
f) Groundwater will have a minimum perced from the surface due to the
increase in impervious surface. The ground water will continue to flow in
the existing pattern.
g) The amount of ground water will be less due to the impervious surfaces .
The water which is perced into the ground water system will not be redirected.
Any shallow excavation may intercept near surface groundwater. This type of
ground water would them make a new course to the main flow of water. There will
not be any withdrawls from the ground water system or the existing well .
1) The City of Renton will supply the water for this project. There
hasn't been any indication that there would be a reduction in the amount of
water for public use.
4a) Development of the property will reduce the density of species only on
this site. The surrounding area have the same variety of plants and grass.
The site consists of approximately 5 acres of small trees and ground cover,
underbrush. The site will be cleared and re-graded. The area which holds the
recreation facilities will also be graded. There are no aquatic plants on this
site to my knowledge.
3/5
b) There are no unique, rare or endangered species of flora to my knowledge.
c) As buildings are completed, landscaping will take place. New types of
plants will be placed on the site, trees both evergreen and deciduous, shrubs
both evergreen and flowering. Most all of the new plants will be purchased
at local nurseries. Therefore, all plants will be aclimated to the
Pacific Northwest area.
5a) The animal life will be relocated by migration to immediate adjacent
properties. The construction of utilities is a noisey dusty job, and most
animals will relocate at that time. The small animals will relocate to the
adjacent property first. The insect population would be affected the same as the
animals and birds .
b) There are no unique, rare or indangered species of fauna to my knowledge.
c) The new families that move in will bring in pets such as cats, dogs, birds
and fish. The dogs and cats will make their presents felt on the existing
animal population that hadn't relocated when construction was going on. The
type of animals, which will be imported, are common to human habitation and are
easily acquired from pet stores.
d) The site is not part of a flyway for birds and is not a migration habitate
for ground animals.
6) The construction of utilities, roadsand buildings will create a noise pattern
which is standard for this type of project. Maximum noise levels should range
from 79 to 91 dBa. City of Renton has no noise level limitation for the
construction phase. The working hours will be from 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM on
weekdays and 9:00 AM to 10:00 PM on weekends . The increased noise level is
short term. The long lasting noise level will come from the people residing
in the units, automobi6 . traffic, powered landscaping tools , home appliances
and entertainment.
Traffic noise will be proportionate to driving in the complex .
7) Street, building and parking lighting will be introduced to the site. Care
will be taken to insure safe lighting and reduce glare. Parking lot lights will
be located as close to the ground as possible.
The evening vehicular traffic will have intermitant glare, by having the area
properly landscaped the headlights will not be a problem.
9) A long term residential use will be committed with the development of this
project. There will not be any agriculturii land use for the duration of this
project. The development will consume energy and conservation materials
asphault, glass, concrete, wood, metal and chemical compounds . The construction
materials have the potential to be recyclable or recoverable if the project is
demolished.
10) The construction stage will be the most hazardous time on the project.
The limitations would be construction accidents or miscellanous accidents caused
by human error. All local and state safety laws will be strictly adhered to.
4/5
11) The construction of the project will be an orderly growth of the area.
To the north is an appartment complex with 3.05 persons per household the
project will - have 610 new residents. There are onsite recreation facilities
to help accomodate the community needs .
12) Any area needs for new housing will be partially met by the proposed
development. The 200 units will be completely modern and will be constructed
to all building codes . The area has enough general services to meet the shopping
needs of the new development.
13a) The 200 new families will increase the traffic in the area by approximately
1250 trips per day. The street fronting the project is routed to the north to
the freeway 405 which goes to Renton and Bellevue. The route to the south
is to Renton. The existing roads in the area are all weather surfaced and well
maintained.
b) There may be an impact on existing parking. The units will provide two
parking spaces per unit. One of the spaces will be covered.
c) Any bus systems which have routes in the area are more that likely to be
used. Bus transportation is an ideal method of travel to and from this area.
d) New families will be introduced into this area. Goods and services will
follow. Shopping patterns will evolve from the new residents to meet the
community needs. The goods will be brought to the shopping centers from
warehouses in the general area.
f) There will be an increase potential for traffic accidents. The areas in the
site will have careful design to have suitable grades. Site distance will be
taken into consideration during design. All intersections will meet a City of
Renton codes. The final road construction drawings will be approvad prior to
any site work.
14a) The new residents will increase the responsibilities of the City of Renton
Fire Protection District for fire and emergency aid needs. The city will
insure implementation of all fire protection requirements.
b) The development will create increased demand for police protection. The units
will be well lit, have strong locks and windows which should discourage crime.
The City of Renton Police Department will be responsible for this area.
c) The increase of new residents will not impact the Renton School District.
d) The new development will have tennis courts, a swimming pool and a walking
and jogging trail throughout the area.
e) The water system will be up graded. Streets will need to have a program of
up grading in the whole area. The portion that is bordering the plat will be
constructed according to the City of Renton code.
f) Renton has librarys and reading rooms . The city also has access to
Hospital and medic units .
5/5
15a) The construction of the development will require gasoline, diesel fuel
and electricity to power heavy equipement and machinery. The forms of
construction are very common and are readily available.
16a) Power is being supplied by Puget Power and Light Company. Any gas needed
will be supplied for Washington Natural Gas Company. Lines and facilities are
in the area for both utility companys.
b) Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company will not have any problems
servicing the complex .
c) The City of Renton has water lines in the area and will not have any
problem servicing the complexes.
d) The City of Renton has sewer lines in the area and will be able to service
the complex.
e) The City of Renton requires that all new complexes build and maintain the
necessary storm water detention for onsite run off. The city must approve
all designs before construction.
iNDING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
06 / - 81