No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA81-067BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE V 7 81 IfineuttilivOroto Ski)mutt Vincent Stewart R-067-81 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Vincent G. Stewart and his wife Lois Stewart are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: See attached legal description) WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: DEVELOPMENT LIMITATION Development on the subject site shall be limited to only those commercial uses enumerated in the B-1 provisions of the Zoning Code, City of Renton, thereby prohibiting any and all residential development of the subject property. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. r t / Vincent G. Stewar4 Lois Stewart STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this o2,52d day of l9$/ , before me personally appeared Vincent G. Stewart and Ldis tewart , the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and or the S ate of Washington, residing in F RENio, s, C- Me ATTACHMENT "A" 30L THAT PORTION OF TRACT 11 OF JOSEPH P. MARSHALL, AS PER PLAT .;.A: s i IN VOLUME 38 OF PLATS, PAGES 30, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ,BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 11; THENCE SOUTH 88°02 ' 38" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 11 A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE SOUTH 01°', 15 ' 08" WEST PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 217 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76°44 ' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 217 FEET MORE OR Z,ESS TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 138th STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY LONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 160 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT; THENCE NORTH 88°02 ' 38" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE 223 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT PORTIONS, IF ANY, LYING WITHIN SR 900 AS DESCRIBED UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 741907 ti N w 1g y- , v-< n • s•' y Zi N v 1 7 O 4 g/ / 48. 4t * I Teilecil- C- 1:1674 (°/.•••••-‘ 12.1• 9. 11' , ' Pia er / 9 c 1,4 1 41\'( 9 ti • 1 i' J , p 2 i0. q+ r w ro ss 9£ 9r. N yy£ Zvi- °.• a , /, '' 14 W - t yb IP tc- 00'' L. 0 t Ii0 or ap 0 81 1 " N1MN' F 04 9 Z15',,,, 5 b0? q7 E- 3V /'/ 7 9/ 61p ' 0800 6 0 71,-----. 8y I 4' w oy wIA 4" J a ,•-, Z n ire rs/ ^'> P- F• F- B9' N o zz. i' • 1101 ' P 2i . 01 a: SZ rid 1 @ 4' i AA, * ilk o aft\\ S\ t$ 001/ 1/ 1 o` D, 6F Ws ti 4 N d• L`_, ,, Ott 2 y 1 W 0, q, p P6 , gfili da 4'1 0 Iti1 bt 0 c$ 00 I{ • L06 L', / o o 9' t evi' a210 a N co 7\3 O o of rz, z d i `,`< s I. J b 1). 40 I" 7d 1 p vo p 00 b° 0 E tiy y 6•' 5. L, ' S a 1 65= 6 - Bg/ Y 0 40. /' y old 5` lb i A I la' s all . 1E rt` gU o ZZ S oo- ems; sue' , s oy` o _ g 4 OZIO O 1 S o 0 N n E 6 G06/ 4G C z- go, ,_ 6t- res 6t 1 it •` o, a oV Lo6.„ L , s, iTh v 0 1 i i o t• 1 a oo v f OS S a to t to 4 1 s i` O . . oL/ l , 4" ld ia<,. 1 0Lt 6 t w, \* 7 • I- -*•--- It\ i 1 ' 9.‘ n -' tz p- ON / 9E';'' 4- r. i. y/ e. f ooI'' M ` ` i 1r0 7 o' 1.. 2b 4A san ter. 7L- /` S Nt 4 f 4 I a o µin f ___:........-- 1--2 2LL,„- J.: P. ; S` l' L 00 L 1 00o Z c l rt 9 9lob n 1 C4 6 5 • 4 por V 1 t 1 Z) t 0 i L . i ' ,` oo y 10 0/ i88 b 9i, 07` I t , i 4 y1 ' Iv Z I 1 j o t 4.- a aura` E 2£/ bo N N SL I Cs-/ OZ £ S / Se 64d ' QUO NOLN3 9z} O££ 3 0f/ 02 0 NO. LIV Via/ o! A P. . j. o- Es u r _ L F ' OSz N 6: z o BB,' v i obz 1 2r bs2 I i N se Or- 20 - 9 % v S 10 0 / BL/ ' B 9 Z iofl c" zjr f(* I ti NI oo. 7 I' { Y b 1n 0/ 00 Ot 00 0600 oo 0 I r . 8/ 0 OfoO I: el zi 1 $ 9 O 3N ` ( 1 / ld` dHg o../ o 9/ 0 Oslo o/ 4, lo 1ro z s' ( h -`° N q z, t°. 9i lo si z *. rr N > e a A 1 v fry sQ" F c AIR/ 0° S. py._ o 04 v b'' h C u o t,.. o.•• 1 f er• ro e9 ' w,/ 1 .. :,,.( rir 4, Or • oz 1 L I 3 z% oo to ti t , f'#, or ti „ id ' H1LOI • 3S v ek or. a s z- a S Z-- f_ 6_ s9, sr 0. 4z- zo-&.• 1 b .. I • 14 DEL 29 Lc o k 44 8 . ago QP 6sz o! R r• rz/ Oil k `'` o/ oo o: oo v osoo oioo M3 11/4 2S °+ e L Fs 6i y ti z tioo N: 4; W w ? E n 1 ( 1 O Q 00 o ol, 00 s e e 06/ 0 . z e, r 1© w 0° O O 00 4` o OOLJ • 0! 6 0 ' 022 ; Oi v 6y' 8l s'' 6. v• Z Zglly` ZL v S y L 8 a 1 ° 6/ ` oz a i2 ti b o 45 a/ n5S° b ooO b nb` ti " a9p1b ^ p4ti, b po} 1tb ! p 9o' b \ 5' v ., 4t4. v0 Q111', q6 ati" Au11 < lis 1` 2 r, r. e/ co/ ' o as' r z 6sr_ iv/ r cr1L: v - - r w9 .« w; 05 eE; z sz, ys QgZO U 40i oS• as - rise co ra• Ae zZ / L Zr V" *? 0 I s"/ 0 y I, GE/ 0 I I e/ I:. oc/ 6E/ o I 8£ 10 Li/ c/ 91 yt yI • Ig8 L 1 1£ 10 - II SE/ 0 i I i£ l0 09L0 \ ti,*OLLD ` Or ' LrP- I 9r- . Iv r' s7/ OS P1Z SI i t 92 4 4 oSzO <' c•. i. t' t 0* r I 9 06- c L ( OC 1 Z f/ Si Sz r, S : M/ E- cs LB N f oC i k 061•, Il '- I Nii' ICr - LB . til oG i oA I ti -- - wegi ..," 4 -:- __ . otrSL.. V/ r/ra, o1e• .-_,• I; - r y7•_ p 1 8o So IN a»- sat siir i ri. 90 'j - _ o N 8 S 3ii.- Sti iIbI s 5 - s 'tit`13,104 0 3 2 K• O i Ov 9.90 P f G 45 ' Z. ,a-;i 0 250 ,'.j 2 7 Z9 2 a is s +is s ;: . e e . JIB \ 0210 o L 028 I 0/34 I I 0/35 IE--- 0131 1 g814 I k 5 6 3/9L i7 \ 0133 Iaoi- /2 I 0/3'1 I 11.O138 I a I I o f 36 I24Y. 1 37.71 7z ,K d7- 0•/3 h- Ld.so I Ik Q 0 0240 5 7S 2.5 50 w N.i7fs.7 -/i.- a5.9 4.# 3b vi io9 74 aws! 1 R 1.`"° w 1, . ,t 5154 W 0646 c4 4 9.r1zA q°55a 1,8 t54 ! p .k Q t 01,'/14 F \ LO 749 4, 4,t ; q'' l 4 '• 9,101 R. ro 4 4y!d2 2 . ',a 4 I t>,e 0 '0112.0 b 02,0 C 200 0190 ti Z> ' Opg0 Op'10 * 0060 0050 R-N VOL.2- Zi T ‘ . le • t. 1 a ti h yu 7sa Z Q COv a 1 nN 9d.96 139 i7 Z its os , 152 EW0040 0030 0040 \ oo/c ° i 4 004 2 e n 2 u h c45"i o zc 9 dlo on H O E Y PA. I 8o tx17 __ free73444' h I.' en 03 7 ee-oz.27E 4s _,.--2 ti 1 A 69 42 _ Jr- '\. 4s S E. 107TH. PL. 3' N Aofts E. 17 rH 70. • ,9 s' ,.'' c /,^ 8e•01_.5- _ 7..,s ..,9- o/ el --_1 * -..zas 1 M 00(0'1 410 l 1, 1,'1oe * 4,636 4 , id .rr. u.7 Z,z-" C i • 4 I/ I 4 s XS M /6 0 17 " / 9 °WI ,S 3 . 2 a 31Q N A''. , I I i 0 ya 00 2 o o/s0 0/60 0/o ' oleo SHADY LANE VOL.84— 43 Tr. /z q; de •, . I .o 0040 1, o t i b 050 0040 0030 0020 00/0 ` D• q 1` 3 IL co Yc,Yjor• cvti+: Pogo i., . g I eV 76' o V t. N es- 02 -349 "- _____ I 2.S¢t2/ ,'=ON and Z4O8, I -- 330. 46 .98- - a.,- 4'J I ' 250. 37 V 7S .5.117 sa-'.e. - N 4 2.2.. R w oi ORD. 2E94 10 2W.s3 N 4 I 4 ' o s j.¢• coo OOG3 ODroO• a ti h qo 6 1 1. 0 p 0 5 6 .f,. ' lyf cm 7 o o \v, 4 2: w tl+ s QIl h 01 i I / i\\ lI00 1f 10!*i"i' e- i / - I' G' ` p, 5 '- '3,0.0 22 i 3•d 6 1 ' ri b '" 1bdi) t ~ 110 le ,• rye` OT 17 0 • l7s O c qG. y : y, 4 o P 1: 11 -f`0% h tita ,0' tr ° !' 8 ‘ '„°2. ° i'j ,I7eft' —• Z St. 74t9e7 r/ RECEIVEDV oV J l ,,, Per.11si:'EA/ R S`-Aida' -L- Iia CIT1joOF 1 ENTON q` Q N 0 r*/ .'Z' 0'1/20 G 7 FARING E?C.IMINERI. Nst 11‘5. .*0p - , 0/ 50 ,- o s"3 4.55 87b- id0 - "k' 5-O C 1Z 4 v e;/ j o a AM SF Pis 1981 d BB- 49 s9 E. o e S P 1's2 -'T ' 17( 1 a 71R 13110 911121 1 12131415 16 5' :t I at 'r o 7 0 0 H fie. 1 s'' E q-.- , 'c' i v •1 a zr le o A_______cv NII cv t1 S4*g9a fos/ b .••' o IY r\ 4 b N op'• ib 6 .o.* i ,, a 07 •I 3• G e 31 U'IA p o R lD y' x o, 8 2873' Z3• OO S bv 3 a 1h RENTp 4 el ON \SO1OINhN58839.34E m I t ot341° ji' I a JJ Y s as.V t1•44 4 W k 0l' yS oti'_'' "Oat'- Iv m LOT I c ^' te ss as w ! .t. c' W I 4 0. c, x : o,' S .' OP sg 10' I 0080 q I qN G Off/i N1N t a;9/i;."/ o .A 4 42 t a .& EXHIBI ,5 ,;;._ 0070 , a it,6 CI 3.6d°a2 5y2 88 38w , ITEM 1 6 a Z 1' 1' ...-- In -' o 0 I ,1 M VIP r, s OLD >. 1 NI 04 aI Its rot 1 f • 9 [ 4 ate K B _,f_ Ot 41 - LXtf-+Y .T 9 U Applicant VINCENT AND LOIS STEWART File No.R-067-81 Project Name SAME Property Location Approximately 300 feet north of Sunset Boulevard N. E. on west side of Duvall Ave. N.E. HEARING EXAMINER: Date 9-15-81 Recommendation Approval with restrictive covenants and additional conditions Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response Appeal - Date Received Council Approval - Date i/e9 41_, /T Ord i nanc i ,3.5g/ Date / /r/ 71;7. c77E :Uer2a,71 s rr Recording ft RV/DOS-OS-4 Remarks: I • • TO: Planning Dept. DATE: 1Q/12/81 FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECUrdinance for Stewart Rezone R-067-81 Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: Certification of Posting Legal Description Certification of Valid Petition __. Map Deed RENTLfY Pro Rata Share of Costs Easement Restrictive Covenants XX Verification of Ordinance j 1' CO - 4Z- 1-'71 Please advise as promptly as possible. To Council tonight for first reading. THANK YOU! Requested by: OF RA,.. ti ., OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 0 g' LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 4 SUSAN R. IRWIN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 0, 94). SEP O P October 9, 1981 TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J . Warren, City Attorney Re : Rezone Ordinance - R-067-81 Stewart Dear Del: Enclosed please find the original of a proposed Ordinance as above captioned. Lawrence J, Warren LJW:nd Encl. cc: Ways and Means Committee Mayor Council President Public Works Dept, CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G / TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1 ) R-067-81 - STEWART) . WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended , and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith , the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G ) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about July 27, 1981 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation , study and public hearing , and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about September 1 , 1981 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan , as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B 1 ) as hereinbelow specified ; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated September 15 , 1981 ; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended , to evidence said rezoning , to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein . REZONE ORDINANCE PAGE 1 Said property being located at approximately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd . N. E . on west side of Duvall Avenue N. E. ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about September 23 , 1981 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections , Receiving No . and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth . SE:3TION II:This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of October , 1981 . Delores A. Mead , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of October , 1981 . Barbara Y. Shinpoch , Mayor Approved as to Form: Lawrence J. Warren , City Attorney Date of Publication : REZONE ORDINANCE PAGE 2 X) 5 y Vincent Stewart R-067-81 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Vincent G. Stewart and his wife Lois Stewart are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows : See attached legal description) WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: DEVELOPMENT LIMITATION Development on the subject site shall be limited to only those commercial uses enumerated in the B-1 provisions of the Zoning Code, City of Renton, thereby prohibiting any and all residential development of the subject property. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys ' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. Vincent G. Stewarx Lois Stewart STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this o4.50..,day of l9// , before me personally appeared Vincent G. Stewart and Ldtis tewart , the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the aliFILED da ORd ECORDyear firSove AT t bREQUESTen OF Notary Public in and or the S ate E'FDIE OF TH CITY CLERK of Washington, residing in 20i MU AVE. SO. REHOit, IVA 9n55 I cRENTU ATTACHMENT "A" VL 2 THAT PORTION OF TRACT 11 OF JOSEPH P. MARSHALL AS P NNl r DC--- ER PLAT • .;:;; e.€. ;IN VOLUME 38 OF PLATS, PAGES 30, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, DESCRIBEDASFOLL)WS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 11 ; THENCE SOUTH 88°02 ' 38" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 11ADISTANCEOF110FEETTOTHETRUEPOINTOFBEGINNING: THENCE SOUTH01 ° 15 ' 08" WEST PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCEOF217 ] EET: THENCE NORTH 76°44 ' 00" EAST A .DISTANCE OF 217 FEET MOREORLESSTOTHEWESTERLYMARGINOF138thSTREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 160 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH LINEOFSAIDTRACT; THENCE NORTH 88°02 ' 38" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A'DISTANCE 223 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTPORTIONS , IF ANY, LYING WITHIN SR 900 AS DESCRIBED UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 741907 iwmip Public Notice Public N . public hearing, and a public at approximately hearing having been held north of Sunset BI, Affidavit of Publication thereon on or about Sep- west side of Duv tember 1, 1981, and said N.E.) matter having been duly AND SUBJECT F- considered by the Hearing to that certain Delc STATE OF WASHINGTON Examiner and said zoning Restrictive Coven COUNTY OF KING ss' request being in conformity ecuted by Petitior with the City's Comprehen- ers on or about S sive Plan,as amended, and 23, 1981 and record, the City Council having duly office of the Directs i considered all matters relev- cords and Elections,O ar T1I1 ,i8b10 being first duly sworn on ant thereto, and all parties ing No. 81100505 having been heard appear- which said CovenE oath,deposes and says that she is the c i i e.f clerk of ing in support thereof or in hereby incorporatE THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a TEREFn t , NOW made a part hereof THH ERE week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been FOREhereto set forth. for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, THE CITY COUNCIL OF SECTION II: Th printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper THE CITY OF RENTON, nance shall be effec published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is WASHINGTON, DO OR- on its passage,appr( now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the DAIN AS FOLLOWS:five days after its aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record SECTION I:The following tion. Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior described property in the PASSED BY THI +. Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, City of Renton is hereby COUNCIL this 26th I<rezoned to Business District October, 1981. Ordinance 3531 B-1) Delores A Washington.That the annexed is a as hereinbelow specified; Cit i subject to the findings,con- APPROVED B' R68io clusions and decisions ofthe MAYOR this 26th Hearing Examiner dated October, 1981. September 15, 1981; the Barbara Y. Sh Planning Director is hereby as it was published in regular issues(and authorized and directed to Approved as to Fort-not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period change the maps of the Lawrence J.'Warren Zoning Ordinance, as City Attorneyamended, to evidence said Published in It-. rezPO RTION oning, to-wit: TRACTTHAT11 30,Record1981 R6810. Chronicle .of consecutive issues,commencing on the OF OF JOSEPH P. MAR- IQ th day of C.; .,C`J e r 19 and ending the1 SHALL, AS PER PLAT RE- CORDED IN VOLUME 38 OF PLATS, PAGE 30, RE- CORDS OF KING COUN- day of 19 ,both dates CITY OF RENTON, TY, DESCRIBED AS FOL- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- WASHINGTON LOWS: BEGINNING AT scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ORDINANCE NO. 3581 THE NORTHWEST CORN- AN ORDINANCE OF THE ER OF SAID TRACT 11; Cyca CITY O F R E N T O N, THENCE SOUTH 88°02'38" charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ - 14hich WASHINGTON CHANG- EAST ALONG THE NORTH has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the ING THE ZONING CLAS- LINE OF SAID TRACT 11 A first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent SIFICATION OF CERTAIN DISTANCE OF 110 FEET insertion. PROPERTIES WITHIN THE TO THE TRUE POINT OF CITY OF RENTON FROM BEGINNING: THENCE iA j, GENERAL CLASSIFICA- SOUTH 01°15'08 WEST,/,„„,,,,t_TION DISTRICT (G) TO PARALLEL TO THE WEST BUSINESS DISTRICT(B-1) LINE OF SAID TRACT A Chief ck'erk R-067-81 —STEWART). DISTANCE OF 217 FEET: WHEREAS under Chap- THENCE NORTH 76°44'00" ter 7,Title IV(Building Regu- EAST A DISTANCE OF 217 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3Qh day of lations) of Ordinance No. FEET MORE OR LESS TO 1628 known as the"Code of THE WESTERLY MARGIN October 81 General Ordinances of the O F 1 38 t h S T R E E T; 19 City of Renton", as amend- THENCE NI .^.THE.RLY ed, and the maps and re- ALONG SAID WESTERLY po adtherewithrtsopted intheconjunctionproperty ORMARGINLESS 160TO FEETTHENORTHMORE r: .. r Notary Public i d for the S#algrof Washington, herinbelow described has LINE OF SAID TRACT; residing at`KKe``'"ntt King County. heretofore been zoned as THENCE NORTH 88°02'38" r`'3 -N General Classification Dis- W E S T ALONG S A I D trict(G); and NORTH LINE A DISTANCE Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June WHEREAS a proper peti- 223 FEET MORE OR LESS 9th, 1955.tion for change of zone TO THE POINT OF BEGIN- classification of said proper- N I N G; EXCEPT P O R- Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, ty has been filed with the TIONS, IF ANY, LYING adopted by the newspapers of the State. Planning Department on or WITHIN SR 900 AS DE- about July 27, 1981, which S C RIB E D U N D E R petition was duly referred to SUPERIOR C O U R T the Hearing Examiner for CAUSE NO. 741907 investigation, study and (Said property being located V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 Renton City Council 0/19/81 Page 4 Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued Ordinance 113580 MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE Continued ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. The ordinance Tax Levies was read. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. Discussion ensued regard- ing present levy being lower rate than previous year and Council- man Rockhill called attention that the City's growth is keeping the tax rate down. Mayor Shinpoch noted importance of 106% tax lid to keep tax rate down also. MOTION CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND STREDICKE, REFER THE SECOND ITEM OF THE Downtown RENTON MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION' LETTER (TRAFFIC LIGHTS) TO THE Decorative Lights COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE (See Meeting Schedule) . (See Corres- pondence Page 2.) MOTION CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch extended thanks to Councilman Hughes for work REPORT with water quality for Puget Sound Council of Government, noting Metro Water their gratitude was expressed. Quality MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, THE ADMINISTRATION PROVIDE TO Progress Report COUNCIL A PROGRESS REPORT ON 361 ALLOTTED SEWER CO FOR Requested for BUILDING MORATORIUM IN THE SUNSET LIFT AREA, THAT TH Number of Sewer ADMINISTRATION RECHECK MAP PREVIOU PROVIDED TO VERIFY LOCATI S Connections for AND ALSO TO VERIFY LEGAL DESCRI ION FOR THE STEWART REZONE Moratorium PRO ERMINE WHETHER I LUDED IN MORATORIUM AREA. C D. Executive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, COUNCIL HOLD EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTER. CARRIED. 9:25 P.M. ADJOURNMENT Council Members returned to Regular Session for purpose of Adjourn- 9.55 P.M. ment. Roll Call confirmed all Council Members were present. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. C t(-L 'd i Delores A. Mead, M.C. City Clerk Renton City Council 10/26/81 Page 3 Consent Agenda - Continued Consent Age:ada MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, REMOVE ITEM 6.h. FROM AGENDA Approved FOR SL: 1TE C=ZIDEr"_ 'ION AND ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Caraccioli Rezone Land Use Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman's decision of 10/5/81 recommended approval with restrictive covenants for Rezone R-069-81 G to L-1 proposed warehouse and storage on west side of East Valley Road. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Councilman Stredicke inquired re location and moratorium, being advised by Public Works Director Houghton that property is located on the corner of SW 16th St. and East Valley Road, south of intersection on the west side of East Valley Rd. ; that the disclaimer and acknowledgment system replaced moratorium. City Attorney Warren advised that owners of the rezone property would be subject to City's present building regulations for permits, Environmental Review Committee, etc. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, REFER THE REZONE TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Comprehensive Letter from Acting Planning Director Clemens presented for Council's Plan for review and consideration, the recommendations of the Planning NE Quadrant Commission for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan in the Northeast Rentonarea; also including Planning Commission minutes of the pub- lic hearing on 9/24/81. The Commission recommended adoption of the Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan amendment, noting the Council may adopt, modify or reject the plan, that no public hear- ing is required, although one may be considered. Ordinance adoption is required to approve the amendment. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND by ROCKHILL, REFER MATTER TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Council President Stredicke requested the Acting Planning Director to present previous correspondence on the NE Quadrant Comprehensive Plan. MOTION CARRIED. Monterey Terrace Letter from The Monterey Club, Monterey Terrace Community, Inez Street Resurfacing Kremer, President and Richard Houser, Past-President, thanked the City for paving of streets without inconvenience, and asked regarding time schedule for street markings. Councilman Rockhill noted striping now accomplished. Councilman Reed noted asphalt covered drains not yet chipped out, also noting South Renton done. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, REFER LETTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR REPLY. CARRIED. Emergency Sewer Letter from Public Works Director Houghton requested authorization Repairs due to for emergency expenditure for repair of sanitary sewer trunk line Rolling Hills break due to saturated portion of carryon wall below Thunderhill Trunk Line Break Apartments destroyed part of 12 inch trunk sewer. The letter noted temporary repairs were made immediately, however, it is imperative that proper emergency repairs are made. Estimated cost is $20,000; Thunderhill Apartments to share in cost; City share will be approxi- mately $13,600. The letter noted monies are available in the Utilities Fund. Moved by Clymer, Second by Rockhill, concur in request to make repairs. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, REFER MATTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. Council President Stredicke requested Vice-Chairman Clymer assume Utilities Committee Chairmanship.) SUBSTITUTE MOTION CARRIED. Upon inquiry, Houghton explained need to complete the work as rapidly as possible, noting heavy rains could cause problem, that contractor is ready to proceed. Meeting announced by Committee Chairman. See meeting schedule) . Appointment Letter from Mayor Shinpoch advised of appointment of Richard Public Works Houghton to the position of Public Works Director, having been Director Acting Director since early January 1981. The letter explained Richard Houghton Houghton competed with 96 applicants through stringent testing including assessment center evaluation to be one of two top final- ists. Mayor Shinpoch determined the Acting Director was the most appropriate choice; having been with the City for 20 years and pro- gressing through the ranks from Draftsman to Asst. Civil Engineer, Head Surveyor, Office Engineer, Utility Engineer, Engineering Supervisor and Acting Director. Mayor Shinpoch requested Council Renton City Council 10/26/81 Page 4 Correspondence and Current Business - Continued Public Works concurrence in the appointment. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND HUGHES, Director COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPOINTMENT. Council President Stredicke in- Appointment quired re Northeast City sewer problems and Houghton explained Metro is planning to withdraw trunk funding proposal; Houghton to pursue and advise Council. Clymer inquired re earlier complaint re meter readers and advise of additional duties. MOTION CARRIED CONFIRMING APPOINTMENT. OLD BUSINESS Council President Stredicke inquired re status of parking at the Fifth and Park Building. Mayor Shinpoch recalled Council denied request for reduced size of stalls; Lt. Perssons noted the out building was being torn down per original plan so that parking requirements were being met. PS COG Councilman Hughes reported his attendance at special meeting last week of Puget Sound Council of Government with brain storming on items such as solid waste, energy, etc. Hughes will be reporting further. Community Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented committee Services report explaining 10/20 meeting to review status of public use Committee walkways in the City and recommended: (1) Public use walkways Tiffany Park not adjacent to dedicated roadways be discouraged in all future Walkway and residential plats; if circumstances exist which require walkway, Future developer must construct it with hard surface and specifications Walkways established by the Public Works Director. (2) The walkway in Tiffany Park between Index Ave. and Lake Youngs Way SE, should be improved with a cement surface and proper drainage system. The Administration should contact the residents of Tiffany Park to inform them that the improvements are necessary at a cost of approximately $5,000 and ascertain if residents are willing to participate in an L.I.D. or other funding mechanism to pay the construction costs. MOVED BY REED, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS a s and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee Committee report recommending second and final reading of an ordinance Ordinance #3581 changing the zoning classification from G to B-1, property located Stewart Rezone 300 ft. north of NE Sunset Blvd. on west side of Duvall Ave. NE; R-067-81 known as the Vincent Stewart Rezone R-067-81. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Building/Sewer SECOND CLYMER, AMEND MOTION TO INCLUDE STATEMENT OF COUNCIL DETER- Moratorium MINING AREA EXEMPT FROM MORATORIUM, THAT NUMBER OF SEWER HOOKUPS Exemption TO DATE IS SUBSTANTIALLY LOWER THAN ALLOTTED 361. Public Works Director Houghton explained number of hookups to date and agreed remaining are "first come, first served" basis or without preference. City Attorney Warren confirmed legality of amendment. AMENDMENT CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED, ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. First Reading The committee recommended first reading of an ordinance appropri- ating $379,760 to Coulon Beach Construction Fund (IAC Grant) . Following reading, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Resolution #12427 The committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Gustafson Final approving the final plat of a subdivision located at the west side Plat FP-070-81 of Union Ave. NE at intersection of NE 10th St. ; knwon as the Art Gustafson FP-070-81. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. oucher Approval The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval for payment of Vouchers No. 36203 through No. 36453 in the amount of $408,812.71, having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services received or rendered. Machine Voids: #36198 - 36202. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, APPROVE VOUCHERS FOR PAYMENT. CARRIED. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO .3581 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G ) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1 ) R-067-81 - STEWART) . WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended , and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith , the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G ) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about July 27 , 1981 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation , study and public hearing , and a public hearing having beer held thereon or, or about September 1 , 1 981 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Compreher::,ive Plan , as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1 ) as hereinbelow specified ; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated September 15 , 1981 ; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended , to evidence said rezoning , to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein . REZONE ORDINANCE PAGE 1 Said property being located at approximately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd . N. E . on west side of Duvall Avenue N. E. ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners or, or about September 23 , 1981 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections , Receiving No . 8110050504 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth . SECTION II :This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26thday of October , 1981 . OhDelores ead , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th day of October , 1981 . Barbara Y. Shinpoch , Mayor Approved as to Form: 1 , ti-ram..¢ Lawrence J . Wa4 en , City Attorney Date of Publication : October 30 , 1981 REZONE ORDINANCE PAGE 2 EXHIBIT "A" ORDINANCE NO. 3581 Rezone 067-81 (Stewart ) THAT PORTION OF TRACT 11 OF JOSEPH P. MARSHALL, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 38 OF PLATS, PAGE 30 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 11; THENCE SOUTH 88°02 ' 38" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 11 A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE SOUTH 01°15 ' 08" WEST PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 217 FEET : THENCE NORTH 76°44 '00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 217 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 138th STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 160 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT; THENCE NORTH 88°02 ' 38" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE 223 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT PORTIONS, IF ANY, LYING WITHIN SR 900 AS DESCRIBED UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 741907 EXHIBIT "B" AI+" ORDINANCE N 381 1_• I • N!•• cc I el* ,', . '. i•a. ig " . 41," ':', 1'..::.'44'-:•1 ! in I4• +1' f.•.• -.V:•. ' 1*J .11- ,: E!.'I ; I I.' 1 1A• I fr --s U... . Q« ee R_6 i M I. SID am an ow mili I at' . be ••.7„.L •Miu ,1•.L_ Cie. °,.,e..'.•1 • l Y 1 3 r 6 , R-2 - 3, 2 7 ti, ;a,. ,): G . '' Ll.„,r - S L: r-.7-7- 7• 411.4114kkilne't 77-a: e.3 R,,,bp t• Z• • c.' l;.. ii am, • . •' f ifrrr' r • r rT ray i 1 r G .__ • J rL..!.L'_!1,,,. 1 I as' , .e. 1:.•,• • JTS* t 1 I r- t, eilila IOW...... I i ,.1.jam=x•...•••(-/ 1 .•.•.... 1`f, '-!4 f .111 ,,{^- M_._.r•._ 1, tfi .... .'. .'. M c1 r 1 ______LiyL ._r _:.r L• 1 VINCENT & LOIS STEWART - R-067-81 i i i......r. APPL I CANT VINCENT & LOIS STEWART TOTAL AREA +45,585 sq. ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Duvall Avenue N.E. E X 1 ST I NG ZONING G, General Classification District 1 EXISTING USE Commercial Nursery PROPOSED USE Same - rezone to bring into conformance with Comprehensive Plan COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial COMMENTS F, t//'< L.. Renton City Council 19/81 rage 4 Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued Ordinance #3580 MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE Continued ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. The ordinance Tax Levies was read. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. Discussion ensued regard- ing present levy being lower rate than previous year and Council- man Rockhill called attention that the City's growth is keeping the tax rate down. Mayor Shinpoch noted importance of 106% tax lid to keep tax rate down also. MOTION CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND STREDICKE, REFER THE SECOND ITEM OF THE Downtown RENTON MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION' LETTER (TRAFFIC LIGHTS) TO THE Decorative Lights COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE (See Meeting Schedule) . (See Corres- pondence Page 2.) MOTION CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch extended thanks to Councilman Hughes for work REPORT with water quality for Puget Sound Council of Government, noting Metro Water their gratitude was expressed. Quality MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, THE ADMINISTRATION PROVIDE TO Progress Report COUNCIL A PROGRESS REPORT ON 361 ALLOTTED SEWER CONNECTiONS. FOR Requested for BUILDING MORATORIUM IN THE SUNSET LIFT AREA, THAT TH Number of Sewer ADMINISTRATION RECHECK MAP PREVIOU PROVIDED TO VERIFY LOCATI S Connections for AND ALSO TO VERIFY LEGAL DESCRI ION FOR THE STEWART REZONE Moratorium PROPERTY TO DETERMINE WHETHER I LURED IN MORATORIUM AREA. C Executive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, COUNCIL HOLD EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTER. CARRIED. 9:25 P.M. ADJOURNMENT Council Members returned to Regular Session for purpose of Adjourn- 9.55 P.M. went. Roll Call confirmed all Council Members were present. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. Delores A. Mead, M.C. City Clerk R4,4 4$ Q o THE CITY OF RENTON L MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055nBARBARAY. SHINPOCH,90 MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD0, 9 TFO SEPT O P CITY CLERK October 20, 1981 MEMORANDUM TO: Barbara Shinpoch, Mayor FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RE: Council Meeting of 10/19/81 Request of Council President Stredicke Stredicke: Earlier tonight the Ways and Fans Committee met on rezonerequestinHighlandsareaofSunset (Vince Stewart Rezone) ; I had asked for a check on the moratorium and expected the committee to say somethingaboutittonight. STREDICKE: I WOULD MOVE,REED SECONDED TADMINISTRATIONPROVIDETOCOUNCIL, A LETTER OF CERTIFICATION OFTTHE E NUMBER OF HOOK UPS TO THE SEWER SYSTEM (SUNSET LIFT STATION) SINCE COUNCILACTIONOFTHEREPORTED361ESTIMATEDCONNECTIONS, AT WHAT POINT WE ARENOW,AND THAT THE ADMINISTRATION RECHECK THE MAP THAT THE ADMINISTRATIONPREPAREDTOASCERTAINBLACKEDINSQUARESARE, IN FACT, THOSE AREAS COVEREDBYTHEORDINANCE, BECAUSE LAST WEEK THE ANNEXATION WASN'T THE SAME AND SOMEONE FROM AREA TOOK ISSUE AND SAID THEY ARE NOT RIGHT AND WANTED IT RE-CHECKED TO SEE THAT IT IS ACCURATE. IN SAME LETTER WANT VERIFICATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE STEWART PROPERTY IF IT IS IN MORATORIUM AREA. YOR: VERIFICATION OF NUMBER OF HOOK UPS SINCE COUNCIL ACTION - PROGRESSREPORT(OF BUILDING MORATORIUM IN THE SUNSET LIFT STATION)- RECHECK MAP ANDVERIFYLEGALFORSTEWARTPROPERTY - HOW MANY HOOKFD TTP. i enton City Council kr 10/12/81 Page 3 Consent Agenda - Continued Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Rufus Commodore, 520 Taylor P1. NW, Commodore in amount yet unknown for damage to yard by cave in, alleging water ran out of the street causing damage. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Stephen E. Eastman, 317 Powell Ave Eastman SW, in amount of $1,646.90 for damage to basement of his home alleging sewer backed up. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA AS Approved PRESENTED. CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. 9:35 P.M. Council reconvened at 9:45 P.M. All Council Members were present at Roll Call. Mayor Shinpoch left the meet- ing and Council President Stredicke assumed the Chair as Mayor Pro tem. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee Committee report recommending first reading of an ordinance changing the First Reading zoning classification from G to B-1 for property located 300 feet . Stewart Rezone north of NE Sunset Blvd on the west side of Duvall Ave. NE. known as the Vincent Stewart Rezone R-067-81. MOVED BY CLYMER* SBCOND ROCKHILL, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COM- MITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. Mayor Pro tem Stredicke inquired re Build- ing Moratorium and concerning referral of 10/5/81; Committee advised rezone only under consideration. MOTION CARRIED. Resolution #2424 { The Committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Water/Sewer/Street declaring intent to construct and install roadway, including LID #325, Davis So. curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paving, drainage, watermain, street Public Hearing lights, sanitary sewers and appurtenances in an near area 11/16/81 south of South 43rd St. and east of SR 167, including Davis Avenue South, and set Public Hearing 11/16/81. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2425 The Committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Fund Transfer for transfer of funds in amount of $58,225 for (1) 2% salary 2% Salary Increase, increase 7/1/81 for Management and 21R employees; (2) Municipal Planning/Building Court typewriter replacement; (3) Increase Court part-time salaries Reorganization and benefits; (4) Fund Intern through 1981 (Executive Administra- Interns tion); (5) Redistribute Planning Dept. salaries and benefits into Housekeeping proper accounts, increase overtime and fund Intern through 1981; 6) Fund Planning/Building reorganization; (7) Increase Civil Service Commission Budgetary accounts due to Police Chief recruit- ment. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. Mayor Pro tem Stredicke objected for the record, materials requested last week for details of the transfer had been promised but not distributed to him. MOTION CARRIED. Resolution #2426 The Committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution to Utility Facilities authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute quit claim deed and SR 515 agreement and quit claim deed regarding SR 515 Carr Road to Puget Drive utility facilities. (`',° r Cony, -- ' ---'Aa Items Page 2) . For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of October 5, 1981 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-067-81 ; Vincent and .- .- 6--X Consent X Lois Stewart Public Hearing k Correspondence A\ Ordinance/Resolution X N cS•Old Business a 41 New Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )A ch c Study Session A. Examiner' s Report . 9-1 -81 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No_ N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A Restrictive Covenants Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Requ red $ Amount $ Appropriation- Expenditure Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach ,additional pages if necessary. ) The appeal period established for the Examiner' s Report and Recommendation regarding the subject application expired on September 29, 1981 . The report is hereby forwarded to Council members for placement on the Council agenda of October 5, 1981 and referral to Ways and Means Committee for purposes of ordinance preparation. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 4 of the attached report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF R44. 4t•Ny Z. THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Z• NU. o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AO P FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235 - 25939 TFD SEP-CF e?C September 30, 1981 Mr. Vincent Stewart 1537 Duvall Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98056 RE : File No. R-067-81 ; Vincent and Lois Stewart ; Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Stewart : The appeal period which was established upon publication of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation for the referenced rezone request has now expired without receipt of an appeal or request for reconsideration. Therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Council for review and adoption of an ordinance. You will receive notification from the City Clerk of final approval by the City Council . Sincerely, Fred J . Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc : Planning Department For use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING a SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Ccmm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of October 5, 1981 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen Name) Agenda Status : SUBJECT: File No. R-067-81 ; Vincent and Consent X Lois Stewart Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner' s Report . 9-15-81 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RiCOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept . Yes No. N/A Other Clearance Restrictive Covenants FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Expenditure Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The appeal period established for the Examiner' s Report and Recommendation regarding the subject application expired on September 29, 1981 . The report is hereby forwarded to Council members for placement on the Council agenda of October 5, 1981 and referral to Ways and Means Committee for purposes of ordinance preparation. PARTIES OF RECOFD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 4 of the attached report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. Vincent Stewart R-067-81 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Vincent G. Stewart and his wife Lois Stewart are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: See attached legal description) WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to inpose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: DEVELOPMENT LIMITATION Development on the subject site shall be limited to only those commercial uses enumerated in the B-1 provisions of the Zoning Code, City of Renton, thereby prohibiting any and all residential development of the subject property. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentati .)n. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants . Reasonable attorneys ' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. L'42:/,'Ze-e--e.-4.A4L4Lzt/L/ Vincent G. Stewa f Lois Stewart STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this o22.day of 8' l9$J , before me personally appeared Vincent G. Stewart and L'is tewart, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the S ate of Washington, residing in 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES M YBE b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or Xendangeredspeciesoffauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YES MAYBE N Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MM B NU— Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?X___ YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X M BE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion-or—the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X Yam- MAYBE NU— Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YFS- MAYBE U— Explanation: oo REPTN ATTACHMENT "A" 4NN I r DEQP THAT PORTION OF TRACT 11 OF JOSEPH P. MARSHALL, AS PER PLAT • .el: o. ; IN VOLUME 38 OF PLATS, PAGES 30, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS '. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 11; THENCE SOUTH 88°02 ' 38" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 11 A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE SOUTH 01° 15 ' 08" WEST PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 217 FEE": THENCE NORTH 76°44 ' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 217 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 138th STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 160 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT; THENCE NORTH 88°02 ' 38" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE 2:.3 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT PORTIONS, :;:F ANY, LYING WITHIN SR 900 AS DESCRIBED UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 741907 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MTIYBE WITT e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE Nil f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Vr 1 fBE N Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: It will enhance the recreational faciliti.dt fcir the Renton area. 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? X Yr MAYBE N Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon t s checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lac full 'sclosur my part. ti, Proponent; sign F• M N name printed) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J . Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 15th day of September 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this /.5 day of 19 d / . otary Public in and for e St e of Washington, residing a Application, Petition or Case: Vincent & Lois Stewart; R-067-81 The minuted contaLn a .P,a.t (3,6 the pa ti.ea 06 neeond. ) September 15, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL: Applicant : Vincent and Lois Stewart FILE NO. R-067-81 LOCATION: Approximately 300 feet north of Sunset Boulevard N.E. on west side of Duvall Avenue N. E. SUMMARY OF REQLEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G to B-1 to bring it into conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions and execution of restrictive covenants. PLANNING DEPAR1MENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on August 26, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING After reviewing the Planning Department report , examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on September 1 , 1981 , at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the Planning Department report and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map showing adjacent uses and zoning The Examiner inquired regarding the Council ' s intent to include the subject site in the sewer moratorium. Mr. Blaylock responded that it is included as a part of L. I .D. 321 formed by Shannon O'Neil . It was indicated that further clarification would be obtained from the Rentcn City Council . In discussing previous rezones in the area, Mr. Blaylock noted that item #2 of the Planning Department Analysis should be corrected to read, "the parcel adjacert to the southeast" rather then "south." The Examiner confirmed with Mr. Blaylock that the property was zoned for commercial uses prior to annexation to the City. Mr. Blaylock advised that there are no immediate plans to change the use of the site, which has beer Honeydew Nursery for many years. The Examiner inquired regarding the number of residential units that could be built on the site, should it be zoned to B-1 but used for residential purposes, and was advised by Mr. Blaylock that, considering its size, pro) imity to single family residential areas to the north and west , and access to Duvall Averue N.E. , approximately thirty units would be appropriate. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Vincent Stewart 1537 Duvall Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Mr. Stewart was asked by the Examiner about his feelings concerning possible restric- tions on the Ase of his property to commercial uses only, should it be zoned B-1 . It was pointed oit that the Zoning Ordinance allows other than business use in the B-1 zone but that residential use would create a greater impact on sewers. Mr. Stewart indicated that restriction to commercial uses would be acceptable. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then invited final comments from the Planning Department staff. Since R-067-81 Page Two no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. R-067-81 was closed by the Examiner at 9:15 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a reclassification of approximately 45,585 square feet of property from G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) to B-1 (Business/Commercial ) . 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject property is located on the west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. about 300 feet north of Sunset Boulevard N.E. The site is essentially level . A nursery business occupies the site. There are some natural Douglas fir trees along the northern property line. 6. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject property is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses. 7. A real estate office and used car lot are located south of the subject site. A lumber yard is located west of the site. Single family residences are located north and northeast of the site. 8. The subject site was annexed into the city in October of 1974 by Ordinance No. 2894 at which time the present G zoning was applied. The site was zoned for commercial purposes prior to its annexation. Upon annexation, the site was automatically zoned G. 9. Property to the west of the subject site is zoned G, the zoning of the subject site. Immediately north of the subject site is an island of property which is part of unincorporated King County and which contains single family homes. Immediately south of the subject site is property zored B-1 , the classification requested for the subject site. Similarly, B-1 zoned property is located east of the site across Duvall Avenue N.E. , and south of the site across Sunset Boulevard N.E. The easterly B-1 zoned property was reclassified to B-1 within the last year or so. 10. The sewer system in the area is at capacity and the Engineering Division advises that development of the subject site could lead to further impacts on the system. The subject site was included within an LID for the area. The properties sponsoring the LID were to be exempted from the construction moratorium (Resolution No. 2392) imposed by the City Council on April 13, 1981 because of lack of sewer capacity. The intent of the Council was to exempt properties on the east side of Duvall . The number of hookups permitted was also limited even within the exempted areas. No evidence was submitted as to whether the hookups have exceeded the permissible number of 361 or whether sufficient capacity still exists. 11 . Presently, the B-1 zone would permit the development of high density multifamily dwellings on the subject site. The Planning Department analysis fails to reveal the impacts of such development of the subject site or surrounding area. The zoning code would permit approximately 50 to 70 units depending on the mix of studio, and one and two bedroom units. 12. The applicant indicated willingness to restrict use of the subject property to only commercial uses defined in the zoning code. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 3014 which provides in R-067-81 Page Three part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. While the applicant has demonstrated that the request is compatible with the three criteria, there remains the question of the impact of the proposal on the sewers in the area and the intent of the City Council in exempting certain properties from the moratorium. 2. The adjacert land to the south and east is currently zoned B-1 . The site is currently used for ccmmercial purposes, a nursery, and the site was zoned for commercial uses prior to its annexation. The proposed B-1 classification is also compatible with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for commercial uses. But the B-1 zoning would also permit the development of high density multifamily housing which would be both incompatible with the Comprehensive Plan and incompatible with the limited sewer service available in the area. 3. A sewer moratorium is in effect for the area in which the property is located. Since the properly was also incorporated within the Shannon O'Neil LID (LID 321 ) it may be exempt, bur the question remains as to whether that exemption was to apply to the subject sire or whether the LID was expanded to include the subject site after the exemption ',as created. The languae of the exemption is that the moratorium is not in effect for the: Small LID proposed by Shannon O'Neil to serve the northeast corner of Sunset and Duvall Avenue N.E. ." (Emphasis supplied) The subject site is not on the northeast side of thc: intersection. 4. If the subject site was included in the LID to avoid the effects of the moratorium, then a rezone which would allow further expansion of uses on the subject site should not be permitted. The City Council will review this recommendation and will make the final decision, and therefore they should determine the intent of the moratorium and the exceptions to that moratorium. 5. Further, the number of hookups and/or equivalents was not presented at the hearing and the approval of a reclassification should be conditioned upon receipt of that information. 6. The applicant has requested B-1 zoning for the subject site and indicated that the purpose was to free the land for further commercial development under compatible zoning. Therefore, use of the property for residential purposes was not considered by the Planning Department or the Environmental Review Committee. The impacts of high density development on the single family uses to the north and northeast of the subject site were not evaluated nor were the impacts of traffic on residential uses studied. The impacts on the inadequate sewers could be substantial and therefore zoning which would allow such potential development should not be approved and restricticns on such development would be in order. Therefore, the applicant should execute restrictive covenants to limit the use of the subject site to only those commercial uses now permitted in the zoning code and restrict the site so that multifamily housing cannot be constructed. 7. Besides limiting the potential impact of high density multifamily development on the sewers in the area, the limitation on development would also prevent the usurption of land tfe Comprehensive Plan had designated for commercial uses by residential uses. RECOMMENDATIOt : The City Council should approve the requested reclassification of the subject property from G to B-1 subject to the following conditions. 1 . The City Council determination of the intent of the exemption to the moratorium and whether ii applies to the subject property. 2. The certification that the number of hookups to the sewer has not exceeded the capacity or 361 hookups. R-067-81 Page Four 3. The execution of restrictive covenants which limit development of the subject site to only those commercial uses enumerated in the Zoning Code and prohibiting any residential development of the subject property. ORDERED THIS 15th day of September, 1981 . Fred J. Kau an II'41".-4441*. Land Use Hea ing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of September, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Vincent Stewart , 1537 Duvall Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of September, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before September 29, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact , error in judgment , or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner' s decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that su4h appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. 1.iiprZil;r I Kr:i '_ SPA I \ 1 F.. 7. i I!ns- . ,•*1st T 1 1$ i;.•3 •MCs.al 1 •. lig,'1E: 6. s-$ 4V%-,• '' 1 .....; 1•• • pial "'"1 trO 1 I ad 74- 1 1 Rt el-. i Pail:;?4N/pa, _;•••,...,:l.. _., I!! ••..6..tial••• ••• .6 W.A. 13, --7..iritX%•p owl —1 --- F.4,... __L_ m._:i-n•, 7 , i, 1, .--,..,_ R3 4 2 '1 r R(..—...2...- it's. g—i R-3 1 1 lb- - ... .4 - ii R-3 _ HR2 _ a _ - - a 111.,„ittPtC6-tJ ..^• .I , orilldLer. - .. • i•__ Ifi- --.- • I 1 1 1 r• 7 1t:, . .L.Lif,4 !;. _ __,,,flit Q j r- Bac btan 4=---MI•11•J- 1 ILL ;T - T-.----r- I t' fl a 1 1 • -••• I •..• . is a VINCENT & LOIS STEWART - R-067-81 APPLICANT VINCENT & LOIS STEWART TOTAL AREA +45,585 sq. ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Duvall Avenue N.E. EXISTING ZONING G, General Classification District EXISTING USE Commercial Nursery PROPOSED USE Same - rezone to bring into conformance with Comprehensive Plan COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial COMMENTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 APPLICANT: STEWART, VINCENT & LOIS FILE NUMBER: R-067-81 A. SUMMARY i PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G" to B-1 to bring it into conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. B. ORAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: STEWART, Vincent Lois 2. Applicant: STEWART, Vincent Lois 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) Approximately 300' north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. on west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. 4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property : 45,585 square feet 6. Access : Via Duvall Avenue N.E. 7. Existing Zoning: G" , General Classification District, Minimum lot size 35, 000 square feet. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: "G", G-7200, R-3, B-1 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on August 17, 1981 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on August 14 , 1981 . PRELIMINARY REPOR.L t'O THE HEARING EXAMINER STEWART, VINCENT & LOIS SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE TWO C. ISTORY/BACKGROU D : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 2894 of October 25, 1974 at which time the present zoning classification was applied. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site is essentially level. 2. Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC) . Permeability is moderatelyrapid in the surfacepc layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to moderate, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, row crops, and for urban development. 3. Vegetation: Most of the natural growth has been removed except for some Douglas Fir trees along the northerly property line. 4 . Wildlife: Some of the site may be suitable for wildlife habitat. 5. Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site (August 14 , 1981 ) . 6. Land Use: The subject site is presently used as a nursery. A real estate office and used car lot are to the south while a lumber yard is adjacent on the west. Single family residences are to the north and a convenience store is to the east. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are principally commercial in nature. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A 12" water main runs north-south on Duvall Avenue N.E. to the east of the subject site while a 12" main extends east of the intersection of Duvall and Sunset Blvd. N.E. An 8" sanitary sewer is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Duvall Avenue N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per Ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Union Avenue N.E. within 1/2 mile to the west. 4 . Schools : N/A 5. Recreation: N/A G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729, "G" , General Classification District 2. Section 4-711 , B-1 , Business Use. PRELIMINARY REPC TO THE HEARING EXAMINER STEWART, VINCENI a LOIS SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE THREE H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CI?Y DOCUMENT: 1 . Policy 5.A, Commercial Areas Objective, p. 11 , Policies Element Comprehensive Plan. I. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Minor 2. Population/Employment : These impacts may be better addressed at the time of future development. 3. Schools: N/A 4 . Social: N/A 5. Traffic : These impacts may be better addressed at the time of future development. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the ERC on August 17, 1981 . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. 6. City of Renton Parks Department. L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed rezone to B-1 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of commercial for the subject site and compatible with existing land use in the vicinity. (Section 4-3014C-1b) 2. Previous rezones to B-1 in the area include the parcel adjacent to the south (Ordinance 3225 of June 5, 1980 - Shannon O'Neill) (Section 4-3014C-1c) See applicant' s letter of justification for further data) . 3. According to the applicant, there are no immediate plans for expansion or development of the subject site. 4 . The Engineering Division advises that any change in use will result in impacts upon the existing sewer system. However, the subject site was included in the Shannon O'Neil Sewer L. I.D. and specifically exempted from the sewer moratorium. 5. Community facilities connection charges for water and sewer will apply as well as a special assessment area charge for sewer as per Utilities Engineering Division comment. PRELIMINARY REPORT _3 THE HEARING EXAMINER STEWART, VINCENT & LOIS SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE FOUR M DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the rezone request be approved subject to the satisfaction of L-5. 14, e 1F 1 A4\ 7;;. 1, A + ' 1•j.•i• t 1 t . jT 1 11.E .' ii.. .. p\ rr r 1‘ -- - — 6 wrifWEID-11MS 1., t' d.. 11 1 F-+ r 1 r"` • 11 IF AC p© 0 IMI N Rom' 1 Lr 1.2 J t. M ?©EarftEa.. " Om ` _ ` 1 51 V J egr e" 51. I G '"*:Tam-.I NN4N6N.\\.., ___,__----OW I 1 1 R. 3430,„; 8 R-2 1 B.1 R 32 Ilbild111111_ f _ 1 r.r rrs ,-.-- 1 sq ' j VIIPimIIIaul.,, '..,7.— -. it•M • R•.43 via j ; ,i. ..,._ ,,. tipociticil in, , 4TIA [41,i. . ... , . - -- go L 4 , , i . ceitopor. ., ...( . . 4,„roir.,1._:._... , _ to 3: . .t__ iPlif...4 e, t,,,315,..s.-&; t:: 1 .: - -- 1 1 G 1 II mai imp . socc: --.._.2 . .. 1 ri"),ft,,e ealis.- 4All 1 - la mr...i 2 k6iNg6/ 6" .*-. * it 'i ilz • F., Lij 1 „ up VI IMESy•. v) I r.M.A..•...I•r••1Q w ST I-. 1 VINCENT & LOIS STEWART - R-067-81 6 APPLICANT VINCENT & LOIS STEWART 45,585TOTALAREA sq. ft. PR I NC I PAL ACCESS Via Duvall Avenue N.E. EXISTING ZONING G, General Classification District iEXISTING USE Commercial Nursery PROPOSED USE Same - rezone to bring into conformance with Comprehensive Plan COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial COMMENT:; 5 r-- s1 —1,2-j>"......— J l 1 i Z r. r,,,,'-' I r 0. l fi).. I 1.r did ti/N N T 14-oat- i1 r`• ; ( yam, tp P.IF1i7 . ' '179 16 e). gVils1 ce. \"'"'""L.,..............••••11- 1 I v. p i ,-1i.,‘,. c--) 1. Gsc" 7, 5e Z c 1 HISn PARK PM Co..C_R[ anlv[Nnr i„...._....._...._.__..............:.;., fOVVALL AV- - ALL• O,oA TN 41t 37 rAr I OUVALL AVE NE ) _— I i f IVIMCENT stLWwp T OUICN STORE REZOl l.y_ jpF RFNCPFFlllEp o0: ‘ JUL 27196! 4'r fl TP P L. I. D. NO. J2I TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $58,127.79 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 209,581 .25 COST PER SQUARE FT o•277352 NORTH Lii Q L.I.D. BOUNDARY LINE - . .....LaL: li. C J J w ti: a O r 3 I. LL r r 9 r 1yy J.4t:. W O w Hr W I i iiciifr W z t, y• „ IA 4 j 1 1..Itjlfl.fljt`.flttltjl.t ;: ^: lI :.::::.:.'... • I'•••:' n:•:':*::::::".:*:•%:•::;:';;:•:::;• i N 1 w Q w lppyy w w Q I I i VINCE STEWART se 4 0 NEIL I „ r o N RP. B V pL IDj.j.. ....s W'" 4'0° le il S Ns 1' N. E lit Spt. S NG r.. ~. v.-1 PORTION SW 3-23-5 Revision 3/1981 8/V/9/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: 11G G tQ— i%7i&4, (JI le re,iw'Sc e./s. / 6....b eto 11 i rdi cinda/I igli c /Loi .i4•i Location: i 4 1s Applicant: iewair ' 1k,v, f t Lois T -- Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: gf/anti Traff' g. Division g/SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ilities Eng. Division Fi rye Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON SPYfQ! O' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: t pproved 0-Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE': i / Signs ure of Director, or Authorized + presentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 14114- -tt Approved ['Approved with Conditions ['Not Approved DATE: 1410 Signature of Dire for or Authorized Representative 07\-\ 4,$) fol.,— % \ ct' A 0 Q , N I14„ SI° n I )\`' fk 04• I i Vd S. w- Eli ai yaw 1 1 ,' 1 n 4 19. 1' if‘ L 0„,.. 4 A i 1yolC W1( 4-' Cr I IAmM 17C nSl C' G¢ Imp At o 11 1 r17s NU clRIE ,/ q ti/, y cit, • aurmamra allgitailaa: i- 6211. 11. 1 IMMEIZaligilll. 4"17........... iMiffein I APPROVED E 0 1 APPROVER . ramIi ' N ( P APPROVED E' IRE ADROIT LOCATIONS in IR DEPT. rowicil q .. m FIRE FLOW AN" g i0 1 I ww j Ji O 1 1 I i " i) II C O 7 2 1 fJ FLJ tv VS / 1. a 4 5 1 MOf' 20. 0-• N y — E oa. x 70) i I M G REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: pApproved 0 Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved 40 DATE: 8// 1 zy _ Signature of Director or Authorized esentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7 Aj f=`L, E A/Co//V EF ! NC) Approved 0 Approved with Conditions (] Not Approved ac:".„ , v z t DATE:g Z Authorized Re rese veSignatureofDirectororuthop REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 5 L-I) C,:. Approved 0 Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved 4. DATE: Signatur Director or Authori a Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE Ei Approved 0 Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved 5°LT.L- ;u:.tr..__PERSSON_ DATE:8/4/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 0 Approved ['Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-067-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-072-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from G to B-1 Proponent: Stewart, Vincent Lois Location of Proposal: West side of Duvall Avenue N.E. , approximately 100' N. of Sunset Blvd. N. E. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on August 12, 1981 , following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Roger Blaylock Steve Munson David Clemens Gary Norris Richard Houghton James Matthews Ronald Nelson Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-072-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: August 5, 1981 2) Applications : R-067-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Building Department, Fire Department Police Department Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures : 1/4 ,44,) 6:4„ o a G. Ne son D vid R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director 7 Cc and C. oughto Acting Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION : August 17, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: August 31 , 1981 OF i • ti THE CITY OF RENTON U Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAY)R • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0‘ 235- 2550 O P TEO SEPj - 1 0 August 17, 1981 Lois and Vincent Stewart 4400 N. E. Sunset Blvd. Renton, Washington 98056 Re: Application for rezone from G to B-1 to bring into con- formation with Comprehensive Plan, File No. R-067-81 , property located on west side of Duvall Avenue N. E. approximately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. Gentlerr en: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on July 27 , 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for September 1 , 1981 at 9 : 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Plannirg Department , 235-2550. Very truly yours, 00-1744-,( • YC1'144 Roger C. . laylock Associate Planner NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP Application for site approval to allow construction of claims office in M-P zone, file SA-068-81 ; property located in Koll Business Center at northeast corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. STEWART, VINCENT AND LOIS Application for rezone from G to B-1 to bring zoning into conformance with Comprehensive Plan, file R-067-81 ; property located on west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. approximately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: August 17, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 14th day of August, 1981 . e SIGNED: 41/11f/ 2: 41ig.11 r" I, w,„ . .14„ 4, +Raj ,„ 4. $, ,. : ., ..`,,•,,,,,t ,,, 4,-*l', V •-_,4....v- u.,,,11 , I. , „, 14,., L-s4,,,,,,#.7, A-, 1,.*4$1. 4-•.:N. ali .4:-0* p.s, 7.,-,, ,za, .:4.*: 411 414"-^^ ,4124 4e, 4 , • ir ,,,',. k....• rr ir, t.' j ititd'. 1 , ,,, ' ' 4'.","* t.1 C.' ' • 411104, 4 f..,A; 0:411E11.k. LCX;octi,TICAN: AM, OR AnillitESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON WEST SIDE ( DW'ALL AVENUE N, E. APPRNOMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET BLVD.' N.E. C*SCPtPTION: 4- DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FiLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT .14,:k . - . , 4'.' - - 44.,:., .-,-,...!*. e/ r ...,, t• 4-• p_ , , -.4. -4-',...r" 4 '. ,'', 5.•••,` 1.,„,,, ,,,,,,..4" '.' i,Z , „'" ..':".".* ,a, ,„. -. -..1A.,,,,:, . ,, ,..,-4 •i".- 4.. "•-4' 1,. 11....'"'r, : '..w71fiat — A-la.:if; .. :43Z.,•:, . ' r. ;.: , 4.,. ..,3,• -914' , of- POSTLEi TO NOTIFY Pii Cn)ENTY OWNERS OF. litt 5 al• ID, .,,..._. ,,. ,... , i :: 47 E ilnq t.) MUNICIPAL BUILoNG i SE° EMBER 1 19. BEGINNING AT 9100 _A.M., i ft NCERNING ITEM ., RE,Z NI FROM 1 G T O B-1; APPLICATION FILE #R-067-,81 L 4Utt PERMITpy0 ,7 / ri SITE APPROVAL 0 '‘A,,,,Otille-,l, riV ii tudi A 0 farit4friQlegatIni Af%LI "el°111 ''"E "ivs,Pi''''INAGELIENT PERMII A FINAL DECLARATIM OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE HAS BEEN ISSUED BY IHE ERC; ANY APPEAL OF THE ERC ACTION MUST B.L.,..11.-11 11± HEARING EXAMINER BY 5: 00 0.M. , AUGUST 31, 1981 AL - 2 IS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 61. 1.:. ,.A - NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : STEWART, VINCENT AND LOIS (ECF-072-81 , R-067-81 ) Application for rezone from G to B-1 to bring into con- formance with Comprehensive Plan; property located on west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. approximately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP (ECF-073-81 , SA-068-81 ) Application for site approval for construction of claims office in M-P zone; property located in Koll Business Center, northeast corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. The ERC has further considered and issued a proposed declaration of significance for the following project: CARRACCIOLI, JULIUS AND STELLA (ECF-074-81 , R-069-81 ) Application for rezone from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse and material storage use; property located west side of E. Valley Road approximately 320 ' south of S.W 16th St. Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by August 31 , 1981 . Published: August 17, 1981 Revision 3/1981 8/9/9/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: AG2.04,t f/ z%7a. e I Ie2/sf e.sck-eri'. f retie e.A-4preutne gum/47 a°44., Location: ifj, c, l O v 42,010.4•Ar, av or, or SuYeSe1 S(vc /107 Applicant:_Siettudirtfikaterrf jAmrs____ TO:Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: f/ /S/ Traff' g. Division j ,SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 467!jjilitiesEng. Division Fi rie Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON OP Yj8! REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: --1-/fifc 4proved Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved DATE':` g/ 9i / Signa ure of Director or Authorized presentative - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Let' 1'i Er/Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: A7/410 Signature of Dire for or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 8®9/9/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: Z j /jC .. d Ie$te700,e .104j ilie ! 6.""847 ) 8.1 etp +o1_ ,' esn—s tme W4 L644 ./ 14,04 Location: iej Suristi Blvd. k Applicant: Siebiagtrldkatellt_ 1.-try-- Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:_ // / j Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:10YUtilitiesEng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Buil ' g Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON 8// REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE Approved Approved with Conditions ID Not Approved 2:7 Sig PE R S S ON DATE:8/4/81 Signature f Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 8/9/2/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : AuzeovG t%7-ei) 4,dS? 4 P rc7#sve 4'l'r s.•ft Tr. 1' 844 81 'tO 4ri A .irl0 C.a11410 im Location:_Iasi), Q aW4 / 4v1' . /VC4,1514 .wow• 3a 141/6 die Subis•1 Blvd Applicant: 6'i!'frtlduYlft1•4 1rtTL! TO:Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ]/a/Ws Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:/Z.S/g/Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks partment uilding Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON 310 Vgi REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: c, Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: ignatur Director or Authori a Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 8/9/v RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:_ AE2.ts'E(R-a.7-8() Are_d_ifp_re7•,,e,S041eilieA p"14) 8.f fart A i"66 eaFA•M Mt E' 0. / DIM 1 Location: e o t,4/s, vw- /66 aygo ay() 4/. off' Su i$ 1 Blue,. ME: -- Applicant:_Sitil TO:OPublic Wor,,,s Department En Bering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: $f/a/gf raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:/0Z./g/ Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN BITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON OP V/9/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7R A F Ie/G E. A16,J N E F RING Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ezi„, 2 DATE:9/07matureofDirectororAuthorizedrReeseveP REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative kevisiol; 3/1981 8/9/g/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : AE204#6 7I 7 ei) Alved"loreg•NeSiNfirdseA 6.01"847/6 801 010 Leftlit_ditels_ratiimmi_e_t4_44171,4A(660% Location:jV. (s e. o'r d Nq 4144 •max Ivo 4/, dP ' Su,eseV Applicant:_ t u• LDS LQ.•Publi orks Department ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Traffic Eng. Division Q/sSCHEDULEDHEARINGDATE:, , Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON 8JiV491 _ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: pApproved [' Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: 8//J I fir/ Signature of Director or Authorized esentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : R-067-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-072-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from G to B-1 Proponent : Stewart, Vincent Lois Location of Proposal: West side of Duvall Avenue N.E. , approximately 100 ' N. of Sunset Blvd. N.E. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on August 12, 1981 , following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Roger Blaylock Steve Munson David Clemens Gary Norris Richard Houghton James Matthews Ronald Nelson Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-072-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: August 5, 1981 2) Applications : R-067-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Building Department, Fire Department Police Department Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures : 4644L--// Cae--&4 Ro ald G. Nelson D vid R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director W chard C. 6t/hi7;1' Acting Public Works Direc or DATE OF PUBLICATION: August 17, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: August 31 , 1981 Date circulated : 00/ Comments due : S e SY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - O7d - $ APPLICATION No (s ) . le.7`4Ce PROPONENT : Sleffiatf' 0,4ice.41'7 LOB' PROJECT TITLE : R 2ONE Brief Description of Project : 1 hot 14/41,441. gen. LOCATION : 14ri..ftgifax. 300 ' , •elf S.ser.f8Y/# Qft4i 7I.ec4144 SITE AREA : f'j$ S 9.SO BUILDING AREA (gross ) v" DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACi REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :X 3 ) Water c4 water courses : 4 ) Plant life : A 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : x 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services :X 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : c 18 ) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation : c 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : 0- Recommendation : DNSIX DOS More Information _- Reviewed by : Title : Date : VA3/, FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated . 00, Comments due : g e S/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - a7a Ali APPLICATION No (s ) . At..4, PROPONENT : SitelyouVairelottli PROJECT TITLE : RG26N6 Brief Description of Project : 011,es a'7 e tetoo. itcr'nitb 4-1 'fb 4A'Alftio ce41,,Bioat go IVei boo am LOCATION : Apprext. Zoo ' /t este SAKStfferiAie otlea,oje e(144 r, SITE AREA : 2''161S'9$ BUILDING AREA (gross ) ""- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : V/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :I/ 3 ) Water e, water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life :v 6) Noise : V/ 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : t/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : l/ 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : SI DOS More Information Reviewed by : 1 itle : Lk") ehiu Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 1040/ Comments due : g `Q S/ EINVIRONMEINTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 07a - L APPLICATION No (s ) . ick.4;),, PROPONENT : 51.60111r //.•MCe t ' lots' PROJECT TITLE : RRZDNE Brief Description of Project :1 frelii Mirth'c a•C 0N I61 11 l /D D Cw.. ' Wr% M a t dot 4tn. LOCATION : Approx. 300' iv•oSr,ttfiY/orC etl4f7/e11444 SITE AREA : f {SSBS42 BUILDING AREA (gross ) .•mmms..— DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO_ 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : f 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : A2 - 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI v DOS More Information Reviewed by :e//.727-2../2/1,7--;,,,QI Title :t 1 e : '4 Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 00/ Comments due : SP40 8/ E\VIROMIHENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - Q7a - et APPLICATION No (s ) . R.-7•40), PROPONENT : Sleti/4014/ vi Neff%,t ZOL'S PROJECT TITLE :R 2oNE Brief Description of Project : 1 i e c lip i e mgetoso. st7**314 IS`/ lb 41'i, i t c,..e e 4g 4tn. LOCATION : j4 f k. 3 D /IofS•syrd /I'Tapletfodir eteLJ , SITE AREA : fe461514 0 BUILDING AREA (gross ) "'mg"' DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :d""-- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : j A 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 1 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : i-' Title : Date : 7 /7/ t.J_ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 440/ Comments due : S /e/S® ENVIRONMEN6TAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - Q7a_ - 9 1 APPLICATION No (s ) . ick.she PROPONENT : 5441,0,711 ofs PROJECT IIILE : R P/bit/dr Brief Description of Project :14 freg Ititt Je I H Au 'A l LOCATION : Arre. . 3Do . A( t somslf61.1.•f l4ip1retta..44 SITE AREA : fC $ S9.5 BUILDING AREA (gross ) i"' DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services :, 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities: 17 ) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendatio . I D,QS More Information_ Reviewed by : 1 itle : j' s/ G YZ Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated . i 8® CommenEs due : S e S/ VIROXHENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - OR_ - APPLICATION No (s ) . ick.7-0, PROPONENT : dq,AI , iliCe$0114'f LOLs PROJECT TITLE :RA= 0NC Brief Description of Project :l reS' IH 1./ ?7 e 1 i4 L / h 1401.it IA 4 €0...4r sa ,,at l 0 a ei1,446. LOCATION : AppeNe. 3OQ ' /ldSrxfd 8' /#/ 514ef 4144 SITE AREA :fq , S 6.0 BUILDING AREA (gross) I DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :4"."-- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : S hie FeANv',Y YGSe ei«S east : 1-1( 641... .. / south : 9vrifr F wTO Sales lei west : geei/Fsikik Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset :4.• 11 ) Population/Employment : 10/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : v 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : i.------ . 14 ) Public services : 1 / 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 1/° -- 17 ) Human health : 1 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : t feMVrt,S'Ofi title : ,A.5.5 S/drrt/modnkei- _ Date : f 1 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 4"4?9/ Comments due : O e 8Y EI\VIR0NHENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - Q7a - $l APPLICATION No (s ) . 44 7-ism PROPONENT : s74iyirl, Oator f ' cots PROJECT TITLE : R 26N Brief Description of Project : dfty 4 6-40.-. 164074 ig.." LOCATION : /Qppret. 300 X OfSiKro fair/We sop 4l.571,AC 4144 SITE AREA : IINSISIWO BUILDING AREA (gross ) 40" DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : c 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : T T 10 ) Risk of upset : K 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services :K 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 1 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : 2 X<"/' 7, 9 J Pe ©DZ Recommendation : DNSI "DOS More Information__ Reviewed by : (' 1 itle : Date : FORM: ERC-06 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AUGUST 12 , 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 : 00 A.M. THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS : RaMAC, INCORPORATED : (ECR-061-81) STIRSKEY HOLDINGS , LTD. : (ECF-075-81 - B-258) LYLE PICKLE : (ECF-069-81) NEW BUSINESS : STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPT. OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE Proposal for one-story office building (13,416 square feet) and parking for 77 cars to be utilized by Employment Security Department; property located at N.E. 10th Street and Index Avenue N.E. ECF-071-81 SUPERSTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LTD. SA-066-81 Application for site approval for a 30-unit housing project for the Renton Housing Authority; property located in the vicinity of 2821 N.E. 4th Street ECF-072-81 STEWART, VINCENT AND IRIS R-067-81 Application for rezone from G to B-1 to bring into conformance with Comprehensive Plan; property located on west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. approxi- mately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. ECF-073-81 FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP SA-068-81 Application for site approval for construction of claims office in M-P zone; property located in Koll Business Center, northeast corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. ECF-074-81 CARACCIOLI, JULIUS AND STELLA R-069-81 Application for rezone from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse, and material storage uses; property located on the west side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street t. Ie.- r ii1Aigi1 . I • i I ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE lit,' AUGUST 12, 1981 1 . 74 di la Al Ili. . i i itte i MIMI tillv .,. LAKE t, ails WAS LAKE N \II ;.,i 'e STEWART ill.A iii 111101 A Irma • ' 111 i:o _ ------krivIlrpeavirTr:4 STATE EMP.,LOYMENT 1/1t I VOYIactitilig21 r i i: 1 , 1I , 11 r i, - 71111 fil , 1 SUPERSTRUCTURE 1 Ilia idi AN . .. - bl`wiOM.. Imoldielle It tdi Mit ''I----- 1116TreNaltilleti " 1 , i du , 5--, • .""'"ftioimaraimision IIIiii*---,_- .4. ,,./ ----i ow i all ii g1 i mow---, J l t 1.%trAll0 .-... i '..s. ..... . 1 II . ' s 1 4 `1/:.-- .`,-i11 t III , 7111.1liCCIOL r1r bottiI3Fi il' Eli 'It • Cill Ikar-illbt1el -*. d1fI III = I _ WI 1 i FARMERS P 1 I 1 _ 7-1\IfYil 1, ' r r t, \.....,. - ..L __,-- 1---7 1 . 1igIIAihuT:1 ... s.I I UKE 1 i YOUNGS kOFR \N` . CITY OF RENTON Cr/1/p o RE7O11E APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY b LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. D67 1/ EXAMINER 'S ACTION \ 2 APPLICATION FEE $ //Q 0O 6Gdf'/-tz-- 77.c`) APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO .9/7 0 CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE rJ a 7 -// ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE At7f-`-97.2-7/ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 226-3376 WORK 1 . Name VINCENT G. STEWART AND LOIS STEWART Phone 271-1664 HOME API- /3 / Address 4400 N. E. SUNSET BLVD. RENTON. WASHINGTON 9805'6n 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on DUVALL N.E. betweenSU/7NSET BLVD and S.E. 1p7th PLACE 4 . Square f_ootdge or acreage of property 45, 585 SQUARE FEET 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) SEE ATTACHMENT "A" 6 . Existing Zoning GENERAL Zoning Requested B-1 BUSINESS USE NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site TO ATTAINE APPROPRIATE CITY ZONING TO CORRESPOND WITH THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL USES ON THE SITE. PRIOR TO ANNEXATION TO CITY OF RENTON, PROPERTY WAS ZONED BUSINESS IN KING COUNTY. 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. SURROUNDING AREA CURRENTLY USED AS BISINESSES. WHEN SITE IS FURTHER IMPROVED, PROPOSAL WILL INCLUDE NECESSARY IMPACT REDUCTIONS. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? WHEN MONEY MARKET ALLOWS. 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 AFFIDAVIT LN`y L0 a oC , 21 I , VINCENT AND LOIS STEWART being dul O6p, dcl'are;t at I am the owner of the property involved in this applic iond -at: tq foregoing statements and answers herein contained and nformat' n' herewith submitted are in all respects true and correc q{lhA bes ,i''of my knowledge and belief . J . Subscribed and sworn before me this 16th day of JUNE 19 81 , Notary Public in and for the State of 14.1.e.4-flj k______ Washington, residing at SEATTLE OWNER ilf ame'of Notary Pu iC/).,°-- 114°6 Signature of Owner) 8916 32nd N. E. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98115 4400 N.E. SUNSET BLVD. Address) Address) RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 City) State) 226-3376 WORK 271-1664 HOME Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 Y \C\FD r L.,, q QP KING - M i t. REAL ESTATE CONTRACT cd. ^,''+ 4,.a ookenACT,..de tat mem!tote dale 7 th dq d November, 1972 +`` ....lryr w/Ast R? ! v ii.,,. JACK A. STEWART and FRANCES H. STEWART, his wife dpy,r rar.ae.oar..'aa..'.d VINCENT GILBERT STEWART and LOIS STEWART, his wife wr.NR tatted the'p.wl.rr,' Ir frTMQSrl:Thu the oiler Agnes to sea 10 the pcgaw sad the ptrrby.r.pia 11,p.at..•lra10 the ene•tM folbohel dowdiest teat atw teas the r#Meo.or,et King tAa.m1...1 ukase..: That portion of Tract 11, Plc of Joseph P. Harshall,'as per plat recorded in Volume 38 of Plata, page 30, records of King County, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Tract 11; thence South 88°02'38° East along the North line of said Tract 11 a distance of 110 feet to the True Point of'Beginning; thence South 01°1S'08" West parallel. to the West line of said tract a distance of 217 feet; thence h Borth 76°44'00" East a distance of 217 feet more or less to the Westerly margin of 138th Street; thence Northerly along said Westerly margin 160 • feet more or less to the North line of said Tract;-thence North 88°02'38" West along said North line a distance 223 feet more or less to the pointofbeginning; EXCEPT portions, if any, lying within SR 900 as described under Superior Court Cause No. 741907; • lb.erne a e..finer a car aoerraa ant se fellow The psltaeet ph is Sixty-E'ght Tho sand Five Hundred and no/100 68,500.110 D.aa.t.r..:ea Eight Thousand and no/1000 0 8,000.04) 1 Deem 1... k..pal.Po aaapa ahr..l a hereby aannarledged,and Ma beans.l rid piece.,.pet..Alps be p.td to roll..,: Ir neon thly installments of $300.00, or more, including interest at the rate of 7% per annum, for a period of three years from date hereof; thereafter in monthly installments of $4S0.00, or more, including interest at the rate of 7% per annum, but the total balance , including interest, to be paid off in any event within fifteen (1S) years from date hereof. a All payments so made shall apply first to interest accrued up to date, balance on principal. The above described and other properties are subject to a note and real estate mortgage presently held by Federal Savings E Loan Association, Renton, Washington, which m ortgage Sellers agree to pay off according to its terms and conditions. Seller's address, 926 Kirkland Ave., Renton, Wn. Al Pya..0 to be nude lerevMrr Chad be roads at ._._ or.sea awn pail a it..alias Ma,Jaw,n er:tty. As oder"r to is tea cenuxt.'de:a et,bane man bat__—Cr.:tober 1,.19.72__—. _ ti: Tie pose4wr aa...mra and Wen to pry twlare debnquenc,all its,,end.wrtmenls that may as belaress grantor ara grate hermits or.allot I taro on lied real notate;sal d by tea berm Cl tad runts.I at sod:haste Ins avowed Wlmrat 01 any mortgage. e.UWI tee other roe aab,ae,• .w Itaa aawm.d yayn:.at 31 or seen(Si purthata wiled it a.1, Ws'.aw•wesa me.a lie a.said peal rant..the,swim.,.gran to pat the tarsi hel.:rt tabn.,wtic. St)?la purch v,agrees,.a1G the puma..prate is Tally paid,10 Imp th.bnallnr.toe and hrreoller pats(ao and mi ewau I.waed to tar maul c.W,aloe tbt,oul tea.rut I'....e damage n. loth hr....d a,n,t t.,r n,In a ."-cony aI trideble to the feller and lot the aler'.b.rN,a ha uses.ma> appear.and to pat' all pcta.u,ca tbereld,t and I.deliver all ,r.iw.e and ',orwak tbemol to am, 111 Tr par ant.4me*that lull mlpeet•.,s al sod real estate has hero wads and mat raw lb.wrier so his ashen.shall to held - I.an....anal Pane Tara,a, amm.o 4 ar. il ast"o,eatn .Mil th•,'be,.a. Mil the p.nnr.r or,.I;.,at the ass*..gel tithes be held to WIr. ...t or smeared tort alters,a,, m,wv.s.rsnla„l repairs unks the o,tsnaat ar aperture, relied an a tumam.d betel,or h aeYlal oaf.11at ed to sad aatk a pall el hit tnuiral gel Tb.p..nk.er aaaoan nil Stuart.of damage to or dnvatlw" it ant a.pruarnenu nor ire tad real trait or Mmalts placed tarmna,and al t`Wary gel sod real ruse at ay µn tlure-.i Ior lath. ot...nos ice. .Ihat no such tomcat.dater tom or tatter dun aaanala a Wort.1 taa.nkraea,r I.cam as ;nrl of dad real emit,I.tarn ter Po,'" art-'kr pare,•••et Ihr..aldrmnalto.award aariry tiler;swats 'I,a.aaahk ripen*.at stratums the rant shell be pal to the anal and at .M as paym,•e on Ihr portholehmastt.otkrSamlb.wallet Sam t.AltonAltonI.,porchau trtoapplyall.0 I pn ,vn at molt.ut.te,naa,u.n sand to the rehud.ling al rewoes a a1.ay.s,....aeru(Late(by a.ah lads. In tau it 1a,Mte a,de a ea,loon loot a prr'1 d :ads .:•.",t.Ihr pewee Is of..nth o.nass nena.ug alai perm..of the naaanank npenr of prods rat the use tnaa a deaotnl to,L . ten.d,,a.'.dipty of won a k.preasw weals a n:avaoabk time,oaku purtl.ater ten, that tad pe*rd, .had be p. r W. r to i,• al at., a. tha garelaue teats hone, J •dl n A111Ten..4 as dal.e.d,.1 airs 1*driver with.. IS daps of the lair al clam g1Fht r'. trolity • re m4aml.•4,........a.oeaa,4SI Mentor,baud by a.a...w,..a•taw Iona...t.+.•nr ulna.11111,Ir mer an p..a ageaa los or(.sage by mean of tklot u Isla,t tote to mid real esurh as 1 theroad 1 Aithalg.t•l.ad' n tors noMasi..sun la.a tw t.°onar i a__ ilia.errant...tat appals te rod per.y Lora. k piaten, I.ba the trraa.l I a .a.lan..a.,a e.....m. T 1.4.•11 L o.1912 a rind., a ass imam..e..a ar cannot*arks aback ads a peW..re mil mat.\sort sat a b ant aarrr.tl•pea N t1r..•.1 sash I.e dm trasta./tar r.as,e fop r..-ar'0-1....•—, , r wry IIe"LLUIds OV 1 3 1977-8 00 Filed by TA ' 12 sheets i.w-.wwwa. ....yv.,.r.l....:+erarhrl a t„asa,,..; „,sup• tM+-'. ..,.. . RENTS`O ATTACHMENT "A" w A 4/ THAT PORTIDN OF TRACT 11 OF JOSEPH P. MARSHALL, AS PER PLAT ANs. . D IN VOLUME 38 OF PLATS, PAGES 30 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 11 ; THENCE SOUPH 88°02 ' 38" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 11 A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE SOUTH 01° 15 ' 08" WEST PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 217 FEET: THENCE NORTH 76°44 ' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 217 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 138th STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 160 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT; THENCE NORTH 88°02 ' 38" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE 223 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT PORTIONS, IF ANY, LYING WITHIN SR 900 AS DESCRIBED UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 741907 1 11 ..) -- 1V3 \ 0i 5':; '' cam>! VO 6 A, r------__- SOIL i5- oo' i 217' i A l' D i-1 r. N O crla J I ft. •• I i D,7 k- S- 73 Ott lt OP la i + s CsC. I al CP c 4tv 13 o z Ini i Z L c i _.x. PA RK INC. 1IICs i 1=i DRIV 1 CONCRETE. wAr w in 136 TN 1_' 1 DVVALL A EE— k 0904 136( TH RAD ``-_- i- 4tt.97 sTAPCR M fXXON i ec m. i i VINCENT STEWARTMQUlCI. STORE REZONE RN TO F—. & `F— 1 '06\ , zI QA, ANNING V L. I. D. NO. J2I TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $58,127'79 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 209,581 .25 COST PER SQUARE FT.2.277352 Lu NORTH z 0L :1 L.l.D. 80UNDARY LINE = .... .- ll! cc 0 J -. J W tii rO 3 4Fi SAS'e1•11.t,t111 IM••II+FIM1.:..........: : .•.• .• . i:: :::: ::_ iii iiii(iifii : 2 J J -- z 0F. aN.• 3 0 z 4 N K Q i'1M R OIJEiI IVINCESTEWART .. ETo 1C) S w c t%. E. SUN5 I ti'j 6 r~'`. r se. EXIST.MH PORTION SW4 3-23-5 1 NT—,,,,,,N\\ 7(Ot o July 22, 1981 Honeydew Nursery 1981 ,_ I 1537 Duvall Ave. N.E. 30- _,,. Renton, washington 98055 t,Y4CityOfRentonPlanningDntel. ., City Hall NiNG ` Renton, Washington 98055 LETTER OF JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REZONE OF HONEYDEW NURSERY FROM G TO B-1 This application is for the request of Vincent and Lois Stewart, owners of the Honeydew Nursery located at 1537 Duvall Ave. N.E. , Renton, Wash. The subject property if approximately, according to the King County assessor, 40, 907 square feet in size. The subject property fronts on Duvall Ave. N. E. to the west, where the property has its access, and is approximately 150 feet north of S.E. Renton-Issaquah Road ( Sunset Blvd. ) . The property is presently zoned G ( General ) in the City of Renton, with this request of a B-1 ( Business ) rezone application being attached. I shall proceed to show that the attached rezone request is both appropriate and timely. BRIEF SITE HISTORY The subject property has, for several years, been a garden nursery. The subject property was originally vacant land until approximately 10 years ago when Jack Stewart, brother of the proponent, went to, then, King County and requested and was permitted, a business zoning for the entire Lot 11 of Joseph P. Marshall Tracts. At that time, the current nursery was vacant land. Jack Stewart built the nursery about one year later and remains a nursery to this day. In November of 1972, Jack sold the property to brother Vincent and his wife Lois Stewart. Approximately two years ago, circa 1979, the City of Renton annexed the Honeydew Nursery and surrounding properties into the city limits thus giving the property an automatic G ( General ) zoning until a future request was made. Since the time of the annexation of this and surrounding properties to the City of Renton, massive changes have took place in the neigh- borhood. To the South, directly accross Sunset Blvd. is a large shopping center consisting of Ernst Hardware, Pay n' Save, McDonald' s fast foods, Burger King Hamburgers, and other fast food and stores. To the East of the nursery os a 7-11 store, located on the Northeast corner of Duvall and Sunset. Around the 7-11 store, Shannon-O'Neil has a business complex proposed for construction. To the Southeast of the intersection of Duvall and Sunset is an Exxon Station. Surrounding the Honeydew nursery at the present time are Collins Lumber to the West, and a car lot of the Northwest corner of Duvall and Sunset. All of which are zoned for B-1 in the City of Renton. Appropriateness of Rezone Request The preceeding brief history of the subject property denotes several items to show the appropriateness of our zoning request. The following is to shed more light on those items. Item #1 Item A. of the rezone procedure guidelines put out by the City of Renton Planning Department states " . .the proponent must show that the current zoning of the property preceded the last Comprehensive Plan amendment in the area of the property and any rezoning which occured subsequent to the Comprehensive Plan amendment. " Since, as our history of the site states, the property was only annexed to the City of Renton two years ago with a G ( General ) zoning; and the current Comprehensive Plan calls for a B-1 zoning for the subject, with the property having already been zoned for Business in King County, it shows clearly that the property preceeded any and all Comprehensive Plans of the City of Renton and meets with the City of Renton' s current Comprehensive Plans. Iten #2 To quote item B. on the procedure list. . . . " That since the last previ- ous Comprehensive Plan analysis or rezoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone signif- icant and material changes. . . " By both visual observations and by the history that was previously stated, it should be very clear that with the annexation of the area into the city limits opened the door for much development in the surrounding area of the Honeydew Nursery, almost all of the B-1 type useage. It should also be mentioned at this time that currently, L. I.D. 321 for sewers are on the drawing board and are expected to be in- stalled tuis summer. These sewers were NOT included in Resolution 2392 which was a moratorium for the connection of sanitary sewers. The resolution clearly states in item #4 of page 2 that the Shannon O'Neil L. I.D. is to be excluded from the moritorium. This gives the subject property all of the necessary utilities for any current use and for a-y future development that a furure owner may require. Item #3 The last item is as follows. . . " That the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested pursuant tp policies set forth in the comprehensive plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. " The current Comprehensive Plan calls for a B-1 zoning on the subject property. The property has, or will have in the very near future, all of tha utilities necessary to meet the requirements of the Renton Planning Department. And the recent development of the area surrounding the subject property makes it clear that this property fits into the plan for the entire neighborhood. Timeliness By looking at all of the items listed above and their explainations , together with a visual observation, it is clear that the subject property is overdue for its zoning change to make it compatable with the surrounding neighborhood. Respectfully submitted as Agent to the Owner 7")-1 -1,17111161/ BEN BERGSMA JR. 22650 85th PL. S. Kent, Washington 98031 852-6464 oF 'ID7;.' c6\ ' ' 1/ V3 1.9% 0- 23re ssz CITY OF RENTON , WAShi RESOLUTION NO. 2392 A RESOLUTION DECLARING A MORATORIUM FOR CONNECTIONS TO SANITARY SEWERS WITHIN THE HONEY CREEK AND MAY CREEK DRAINAGE BASINS WHEREAS the areas within the Honey Creek and May Creek Drainage Basin are undergoing rapid growth , and WHEREAS the Honey Creek and May Creek Basin areas have previously been determined to be areas of concern of the City for sanitary sewer capacity , and WHEREAS the City has previously defined the boundaries of the HOney Creek and May Creek Drainage Basin as per attachment A" which is incorporated herein as if fully set forth , and WHEREAS the presently existing sanitary sewers within those basins are operating at or near capacity , and WHEREAS the capacity of those sanitary sewers are periodically exceeded in times of high rain or intensive use resulting in the discharge of untreated sewage into surface water collection systems , creeks and streams , and WHEREAS such discharge to surface water collection systems , creeks and streams is detrimental to the public health and safety , NOW THEREFORE TILE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The above recitals are found to be true and correct . SECTION II : There is hereby declared a moratorium on the connection of new construction to the systems served by the Sunset Lift Station . This moratorium will be in effect until the capacity of the system is improved so additional connections can be allowed unless revoked by the City Council , whichever occurs first. 1- This moratorium shall not be in effect with respect to the following properties : 1 . 75-unit apartment complex on the east side of N. E . 12th Street and Union Avenue N.E. 2. 16-unit duplex complex southerly of the shopping center at Sunset and Duvall Avenue N .E . 3 . Neighborhood shopping center at N.E . corner of Union and Sunset 4) Small L. I . D. proposed by Shannon O'Neil to serve the northeast corner of Sunset and Duvall Avenue N.E . 5. Burger King property on S .W. corner of Sunset and Duvall 6 . Dalpay property located on S .W. corner of Sunset and Union Avenue N.E. 7 . Dalpay property located at the S .W. corner of Sunset and Whitman Court N.E . 8 . Dalpay property known as Lot 1 of the Honey Dew No . 3 . The above properties , while not included in the moratorium shall have the right to hookup to this sewer only until 361 equivalent units have hooked up to the sewers , or until the City Council has determined following the Public Works Director' s recommendation , that the sewers have reached or exceed capacity . Upon the occurrence of either such Council finding or permits being issued to construct the 361 equivalent units , no further connections shall he permitted. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 13th day of April , 1981 . Delores A. Mead, ' City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 13th day of April , 1981 . 1,433(00) A—SktyC. Barbara Y. Shinp Mayor Approved as to form : 14t Lawrence J . W ren , City Attorney ITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 'C• gel Application No. G7-f/ w Environmental Checklist No. .471/--- d7a-8/ Qom/ PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date: 164 O Q ANNING Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance E-jDeclaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent VINCENT AND LOIS STEWART 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 4400 N.E. SUNSET BLVD. RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 271-1664 HOME 226-3376 WORK 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 45 .585 SOUARE FEET, ZONED G GENERAL IN THE CITY OF RENTON. PRIOR TO ANNEXATION TO THE CITY, PROPERTY WAS ZONED BUSINESS IN KING COUNTY AND IS CURRENTLY BEING USED AS A RETAIL BUSINESS. THE CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALLOWS FOR A B-1 , BUSINESS USE, ZONING, WHICH IS THE ZONING THE PROPONENT IS REQUESTING. 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 60 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET BLVD. ON DUVALL N.E. ON THE WEST SIDE OF DUVALL. THIS ZONING PROPOSAL WILL HAVE NO IMPACT ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AS THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY USED FOR BUSINESS PTIRPOSES_ 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : CURRENTLY USED FOR BUSINESS_ 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain : NOT AT PRESENT. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain : NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II , ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?XX YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features?XX MArYESBB T - d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES M YBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? XX YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES M-B Explanation: 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? XX YES MAYBENO c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? XX YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? XX YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? XX YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? XX YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? XX YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?XX YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? XX YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? XX . YES MBE NO Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , XX microflora and aquatic plants)? YES— M YBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or XX endangered species of flora?YES MBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE N d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? XX YES MATTE NO Explanation: 1 4- 5) Fauna. biill the proposal result in : a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? XX YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or XX endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? XX YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? XX YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? XX YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? XX YES MAYBENN Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area?XX YES- MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? XX YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? XX ZEES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Y! M NO Explanation: 5- 12) Housing.. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing?xx. YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?XX YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand - for new parking? XX YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?XX YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? XX YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? XX YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? XX YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? XX YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? XX YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE iFL d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? XX YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? XX YES MAYbE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? XX YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MABE Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? JUL YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? XX YES MAYBE NO c) Water? XX YES MAYBE NO d 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? XX YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? XX YES MAYBE NO Explanation: L. I.D. NO. 321 ( SEE ATTACHMENT ) WILL ADEQUATELY SERVE SAID PROPERTY AND IS DUR FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE SUMMER OF 1981. ENGINEER IS CURRENTLY DRAWING PLANS AND L. I.D. HAS BEEN PASSED. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental Tn.- MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? XX YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?XX YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? XX YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon thi checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful 1 k of full dis osure on my part. le/7 Proponent:2 G c sieved) 214 VINCENT G. STEWART name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 eceipt # /9/7 6} CITY OF RENTON PLANNNING DEPART MENT NAME C7kccJarf( (/`',?CeFiCf. 1 tI/`5 DATE /a2/8/ PROJECT & LOCATION le?Ov ' l/v -OexcvnS=fed Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total zones 1/0te 0 16 , 00 Environmental Checklist 6 9. 0 0 Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES 41 ! Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank vou. ENDING ' OF FILE FILE TITLE 4wa.w 067 Of ilheineme 0/:0) etuetht