Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA81-069BEGINNING OF FILE MICROFILMED1 FILE TITLE 0741.4, s v ti krfr,tiy — Applicant JULIUS & STELLA CARACCIOLI File No. R-069-81 Project Name SAME Property Location West side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street HEARING EXAMINER: Date 10-5-81 Recommendation Approval with restrictive covenants Reno k9iu r No. O ?osd 9 Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response Appeal - Date Received Council Approval - Date Ord i nance - 3 5 5 3 Date ///9/$ Mylar to County for Recording Mylar Recording # Remarks: 41011 INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date 11-5-81 TO: City Clerk FROM: Engineering Department SUBJECT:Caraciolli Rezone R-069-81 Per your request , attached please find the legal description for the ordinance of said subject re-zon'. Otc,- 8l presented as Exhibit "A" . Abdoul Gafour AG/ Engineering Specialist attachment cc : Planning Dept . 411114110 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description CARACCIOLI REZONE - R-069-81 That portion of Lots 8 , 9 , 10 , 49 , 50 and 51 in vacated Block 19ofC. D. Hillman ' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City ofSeatt:.e , Division No . 1 , as per plat recorded in Volume 17 ofPlatsonpage74 , records of King County , lying West of the EastValle:, Frontage Road , as conveyed to the State of Washington bydeedrecordedunderRecordingNo . 5442597 ; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated Harriman Avenue adjoining ,which upon vacation , attached to said property by operation of law; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington . O \'C October 5, 1981 o hay_ OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEAR 1 NG EXAMINER G?G/. e •• a,•• ; CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Julius and Stella Caraccioli FILE NO. R-069-81 LOCATION: West side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street. SUMMARY OF REQJEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse and material storage uses. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with restrictive covenants. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with restrictive covenants. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on September 16, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on September 22, 1981 at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Responding to the Examiner' s inquiry regarding proposed fill operations on the property, Mr. Blaylock advised that the area designated for construction of a building will be required to be filled. The Examiner noted that most of the lots surrounding the site previously rez)ned to an L-1 designation had contained 6,000 square feet; however, because the subject site contains 32 ,000 square feet, he inquired if there was any reason why a rezone to the Manufacturing Park classification was not proposed. Mr. Blaylock explained that due to the narrow configuration of the lot , maneuverability space for large trucks could not be provided under the side and rear yard setback requirements of the M-P zone. A concern was expressed by the Examiner that elimination of side yard requirements would result in lack of provision of landscaping to buffer the site from adjoining lots. Mr. Blaylock stated that adjacent properties located to the north, south and west of the site are zoned L-1 and H-1 , respectively, and are not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Larry Brown Western Pacific Properties 13975 Interurban Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98168 Mr. Brown advised concurrence in the staff report recommendations. He strongly supported approval of a rezone to the L-1 classification rather than the M-P zone in order to utilize the site to its fullest potential . He requested that if and when the P-I Channel is constructed or other measures taken for provision of storm drainage facilities in the valley, a mechanism be included in restrictive covenants to remove the requirement for an equal amount of excavation for purposes of flood control in order to assure that the restriction does not run with the land even after measures have been taken by the city or county to mitigate the storm drainage problem. Responding to the Examiner' s inquiry regarding imposition of restrictive covenants at the rezone stage, Mr. Blaylock confirmed the Planning Department' s intent for execution of the document as part of rezone approval . The Examiner requested clarification of the fill R-069-81 Page Two process, and asked if the applicant would be required to excavate one foot over an equal square footage if the site were filled one foot over a certain square footage. Mr. Blaylock advised than if the applicant were to bring in 10,000 cubic yards of fill , he would have to excavate an area below flood level to accommodate displaced water. The Examiner inquired regarding the responsibility for calculation of the formula if impermeable surfaces are installed on the site. The intent of the Planning Department to require a general rather than specific restrictive covenant was discussed by Mr. Blaylock, who noted that the covenant would contain a general formula to require existing flood storage to be maintained on the site through the fill and excavation process. The formula would subsequently be calculated at the time of the fill permit application. The Examiner requested further comments. Mr. Blaylock advised that the department would not object to execution of restrictive covenants which would allow deletion of flood storage requirements at the time the P-1 Channel is constructed. Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. R-069-81 was closed by the Examiner at 9:21 a.m. FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a reclassification of approximately 32,520 square feet of property from G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) to L-1 (Light Industry) . 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. Utilities will have to be extended to the subject site. 7. The subject property is located on the west side of the East Valley Road about 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street. Immediately east of the East Valley Road is SR-167. 8. The subject site was annexed into the city by Ordinance No. 1745 in April of 1959, at which time the current G classification was applied. 9. The site is level and is located in the northern extreme of the Green River Valley. The site is located within the Federal Emergency Management Agency flood fringe. 10. The uses in the vicinity are generally industrial or manufacturing park type uses. The area to the north is in transition from old single family dwellings to commercial and industrial uses. 11 . The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of manufacturing parks. The site is also within the orbit of the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, and screening and site review are recommended to provide compatible and aesthetic working environments. 12. The area has a mix of industrial zoning. Immediately north is an L-1 property, the classification requested by the applicant. South and west of the subject site is an H-1 (Heavy Industry) zone. South of S.W. 19th Street is a large G zone. 13. Much of the area has been filled pursuant to grade and fill permits. The subject site would have to be filled to bring it above the flood level for this area. 14. The subject lot is about 270 feet deep by 120 feet wide, and the requirements of the M-P (Manufacturing Park) zone would require 20 foot side yard setbacks. The applicant would be left with 80 feet of buildable width. 15. The Planning Department recommended that the site be classified to L-1 to provide less stringent sideyard setback requirements. They indicated that the 60-foot front setback R-069-81 Page Three should be required. 16. The Declaration of Non-Significance requires that ``:^ frond potential of the site be mairtained. This would be accomplished by removing a like amount of material from the site as has been used to fill the site. This would not account for the loss of ground at sorption caused by the covering of the site with impermeable surfaces such as paving and structures. 17. There have been a number of rezones of property to L-1 in the areas surrounding the subject site. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3014 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed rezone as conditioned below satisfies the above enumerated criteria. 2. The subject site is located within a developing industrial area and is no longer suitable fcr residential development. The site has good access to the major highway network north and east of the property and will provide an appropriate location for an industrial operation. 3. The size of the lot constrains the applicant from reasonably utilizing the lot to advantage if all the setbacks imposed by the M-P zone were to be required; therefore, it seems reasonable to permit the lot to be reclassified to L-1 , a category which allows many of the manufacturing park uses, and impose restrictions of the M-P zone to make the development compatible with both the Comprehensive Plan and the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. 4. The 60-foot setback will not be overly burdensome since the lot is quite deep compared to its width. The property should also be screened as required by the M-P zone, and subject to a site approval review prior to development to assure fidelity to the various comprehensive plans. 5. Since the property is located within the flood fringe as currently defined by FEMA,the ERC issued the Declaration of Non-Significance for the site subject to provision of flood storage capacity equal to the 100-year flood calculations. The recommendation to assure such capacity is that the applicant excavate an amount of material from thesiteequaltotheamountoffillrequiredtoprovideasafebuildingfoundationheight.Since this formula ignores the current holding capacity of the ground which would be lost after coverage of the site with impermeable surfaces, the applicant should be required to add capacity equal to the lost quantity. 6. Subject to the conditions indicated above, the reclassification of the subject property should prove to be in the public interest, and as the neighboring properties are similarly zoned, there will be no adverse effect on those properties. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject request from G to L-1 subject to the following conditions: 1 . The applicant to execute restrictive covenants to abide by all of the requirements of the M-P zone with the exception of rear yard and side yard setbacks. 2. The applicant to execute covenants to maintain the 100 year flood capacity of thesubjectsiteincludingtheholdingcapacityofthesoilsandsubsurfaceofthesite;the covenant as to flood storage capacity shall only be in effect until such time as this capacity is no longer necessary as a result of a change in flood hazard. R-069-81 Page Four ORDERED THIS 5th day of October, 1981 . JLL Fred J . Kau an Land Use Hea ing Exa iner TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of October, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Larry Brown, Western Pacific Properties, 13975 Interurban Ave. S. , Seattle, WA 98168 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of October, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman and Members , Planning Commission Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pur= uant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the city' s code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before October 19, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the dec sion of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner' s decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. 1 ems 1 r 'S-w-- "L— f ,i a 1. ti _ L r.. " 3y.._ ..-1 i L; 7 ..7 -- L.:10MI;P‘ kt..a. I.V'- 1 . Z 1 i fa, 1 i bi G I F>C C a a,' IH 1I I I , i 3C AT 1 y mar C.vniu ; li • I l‘r. 6.11111i , NIu' fllll: Nnll 1 NIP 14;liml"I Link_ At ..}- . a 4,:z- ... 0 I e.,. ......d a log_. _ : !,, .0 . - 4It.y 1, — I1l i r III Q 7 I - 1i r 8 1, : - ', NI I I. ii.., 411 .... 4 1 .„, R alb I 0»' ` . ems'Ihi-pip 1 ' -.I._- II Mr" ,. •. J, f ; j -1 k. if---2.4_ . _ i '\\ .1 1_: V i I G-shoo CARACCIOLI , JULIUS & STELLA, R-069-81 APPLICANT CARACCIOLI , JULIUS & STELLA TOTAL AREA + 32,520 square fee! PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via East Valley Road EXISTING ZONING "G" General Classification District EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Future Office, Warehouse & Material -Storage Uses Light Industrial; H-1 , Heavy IndustrialCOMPREHENSIVELANDUSEPLANL-1 , COMMENTS 1 AMMO, a, k v 4,, ,, considered oy me Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehen- sive Plan,as amended,and the City Council having duly considered all matters relev- ant thereto, and all parties having been heard appear- Affidavit of Publication ing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF STATE OF WASHINGTON THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING ss. WASHINGTON, DO OR- DAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I:The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby Ai PM .iobago being first duly sworn on rezoned to Light Industrial District(L-1)as hereinbelow specified;subject to the find- oath,deposes and says that..A. 4 is the .11440...0 Ittrit of ings, conclusions and deci- THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a sion of the Hearing Examin- week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been er dated October 5, 1981; for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, the Planning Director is printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper hereby authorized and di- published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is rected to change the maps now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the of the Zoning Ordinance,as aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Daily Record amended, to evidence said Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior rezoning, to-wit: Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit, King County, That portion of Lots 8,9, 10, 49, 50 and 51 in f' . vacated Block 19 of C.D. Washington.That the annexed is a Ordinance 35- Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the R6829 City of Seattle, Division No. 1,as per plat record- ed in Volume 17 of Plats, on page 74, records of as it was published in regular issues(and King County, lying West not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of the East Valley Fron- tage Road, as conveyed to the State of Washing- of ton by deed recorded1consecutiveissues,commencing on the CITY OF RENTON under Recording No. 13th November 81 WASHINGTON 5442597; dayof 19 and ending the ORDINANCE NO. 3583 TOGETHER WITH that g AN ORDINANCE OF portion of vacated Harri- THE CITY OF RENTON, man Avenue adjoining, WASHINGTON which,upon vacation,at- day of 19 both dates CHANGING THE ZON- tached to said property ING CLASSIFICATION by operation of law;inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- OF CERTAIN PROPER- Situate in the County ofscribersduringallofsaidperiod. That the full amount of the fee TIES WITHIN THE CITY King , State of OF RENTON FROM Washington. charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.3}!*,8which GENERAL CLASSIFI (Said property being to has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the CATION DISTRICT (G) cated at West side of first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL East Valley Road ap- insertion. DISTRICT (L-1) (R-069- proximately 320 feet 81 CARACCIOLI). south of Southwest 16th WHEREAS under Chap- Street.) mil, , e, ' dei ter 7,Title IV(Building Regu- AND SUBJECT FURTHER lations) of Ordinance No. to that certain Declaration of eb1 e1' clerk' 1628 known as the"Code of Restrictive Covenants ex- General Ordinances of the ecuted by Petitioner-Own- City of Renton", as amend- ers on or about October 21, 1 3th dayof ed, and the maps and re- 1981 and recorded in the Subscribed and sworn to before me this ports adopted in conjunction office of the Director of Re- therewith, the property cords and Elections,Receiv- NQvember 1981 hereinbelow described has ing No. 8110270509 and heretofore been zoned as which said Covenants are General Classification Dis- hereby incorporated and trict(G);and made a part hereof as if fully Notary Public in an r the of Washington, WHEREAS a proper yeti- set forth Ordi- residinga King County. tion for change of zone SECTION II: This classification of said proper- nance shall be effective up- e eral h£`v ty has been filed with the on its passage,approval and Planning Department on or five days after its publica- Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June about July 31, 1981, which tion. 9th, 1955. petition was duly referred to PASSED BY THE CITY the Hearing Examiner for COUNCIL this 9th day of Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, investigation, study and November, 1981. adopted by the newspapers of the State. public hearing, and a public Delores A. Mead hearing having been held City Clerk thereon on or about Sep- APPROVED BY THE tember 22, 1981, and said MAYOR this 9th day of matter having been duly November, 1981. Lawrence J. Warren City Attorney V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 Published in the Daily Re- cord Chronicle November 13, 1981. R6829 k 0 67 41 Renton City Council 11/2/81 Page 3 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee Committee report recommending second and final readings for an ordinance appropriating and transferring grant funds in amount of $379,760 Ordinance 113582 to Coulon Beach Park Construction Fund; Ordinance on first read- Appropriation ing 10/26/81. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE Beach Park Grant AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. First Reading The Committee recommended first reading of an ordinance rezoning property from G to L-1 located at west side of East Valley Road south of SW 16th St. ; known as the Caraccioli Rezone R-069-81. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. First Reading The Committee recommended first reading of an ordinance to appropriate and transfer funds in amount of $10,000 unto Profes- sional Services, Building Department. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Resolution 112428 The Committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Proposed Vacation proposing vacation of a portion of SE 18th St. , Rolling Hills Portion SE 18th Village, westerly of Rolling Hills Place South. The resolution sets public hearing 12/7/81. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Appointment The Ways and Means Committee recommended concurrence in the Confirmed Mayor's appointment of William F. Anderson to Position No. 5 on the Board of Adjustment, effective to 9/6/85. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch commended good work of Housing and Development REPORT Coordinator Ed Hayduk on the Clean Up Program in the Highlands, North and South Renton areas; reporting 274 house calls; 51.49 tons of rubbish hauled to refuse transfer station. The Mayor recalled request to King County Executive Dunlap for reduction in dump fees for the special project; negative response having been received by Stredicke. AUDIENCE CCMMENT City Clerk Mead announced tabulation of election returns for City Council positions Tuesday evening 11/3/81 and extended invitation. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. 8:40 P.M. Delores A. Mead, .C. City Clerk CALL FOR BIDS ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM Bid, Tax & Total Application Bidder's Name & Address Hardware System Software Software Wang Laboratories, Inc. 101,750 (Included in 131,500 2300 Eastlake East Hardware Bid) Seattle, 98102 Deloitte-Haskins-Sells Suite 2100 1001 4th Avenue Seattle, WA 98154 Northwest Information System 128,830 (Included in No Bid 444 N.E. Ravenna Blvd. Hardware Bid) Suite 308 Seattle, WA 98115 NCR Corporation 129,8E1 $18,003 74,700 500 Fairview Avenue North Seattle, WA IBM Corporation 130,730 $ 2,550 No Bid 1200 5th Avenue P. 0. Box 3557 Seattle, WA 98124 Burroughs Corporation 152,309 $18,000 110,000 190 Queen Anne North P. 0. Box 3557 Seattle, WA 98124 Sperry-Univac 168,767 $26,112 114,792 330 112th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Syscon 178,970 (Included in 56,800 15635 Saticoy Street Hardware Bid) Suite A Van Nuys, CA 91406 Prime Computer Inc. 1603 116th Avenue N.E. Suite 112 Be11ev e , :cam. , 1111 CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3583 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G ) TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. DISTRICT (L-1 ) (R-069-81 CARACCIOL.I ) . WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV ( Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton." , as amended , and the maps and reports adopted it conjunction therewith , the property hereinbelow described has heretofore beer zoned as General Classification District (G ) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department or, or about July 31 , 1981 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation , study ar:d public hearing , and a public hearing having beer. held thereon or: or about September 22 , 1981 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan , as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having beer heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON , DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Light Industrial District (L-1 ) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated October 5, 1981 ; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended , to evidence said rezoning , to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein . Said property being located at West side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south of Southwest 16th Street. ) REZONE ORDINANCE PAGE 1 AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners or. or ' about October 21 , 1981 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections , Receiving No . 8110270509 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth . SECTION II :This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 1TH day of November , 1981 . ZietelL/' (7 ZZ(ia (, Delores A. Mead , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 9TH day of November , 1981 . ahtt&XbJ `' •S,, ow Barbara Y. Shinpoch , Mayor Approved as to Form : Lawrence J . W rren , City Attorney Date of Publication : NOVEMBER 13 , 1981 REZONE ORDINANCE PAGE 2 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description CARACCIOLI REZONE - R-069-81 That portion of Lots 8 , 9 , 10 , 49 , 50 and 51 in vacated Block 19 of C . D. Hillman ' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle , Division No . 1 , as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats , on page 74 , records of King County , lying West of the East alley Frontage Road , as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Recording No . 5442597 ; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated Harriman Avenue adjoining , which , upon vacation , attached to said property by operation of law ; Situate in the County of King , State of Washington . t- . t L G_1 I F WI I i L:III- P P%./! 4. 6._1 gi -''' . 1; .e.t4. ,--,- . ..,-,,,: ,:.., •._ SirlFc...., .7,-.J.,-.e .,. — ti. 1, 1 Ii j bit I-71`{iii,.AR k . •' .., ' • 4....i‘ tr. T L• i ' IT; -,.: .• • 11*._.., ), , _ N.--. --, 1"--7.:1: . 7.---..!1. 2' 1: --:1 '/''e-'---44-1---41"1"--. 13-I. 1 MP , G-6t000 I t t\ i , s 3:„ 4/ 3t J'^ c c j,, 1 '•• .„ . .., ai s1/14.1 PO A• , R-1 i r Miiiimp ; _., 44.:_i 4 nor h 1jl I. . J i' t G-96nn i1 o i 0 CARACCIOLI , JULIUS & STELLA, R-069-81 APPLICANT CARACCIOLI , JULIUS & STELLA TOTAL AREA + 32 , 520 square fe( PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via East Valley Road EXISTING ZONING "G" General Classification District EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USEFuture Office, Warehouse & Material -Storage Uses COMIREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN L-1 , Light Industrial; H-1 , Heavy Industrial COMMENTS an..... rwea....ramom,._a:z.::: :.. OM..ni Renton City Council 10/26/81 Page 3 Consent Agenda - Continued Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, REMOVE ITEM 6.h. FROM AGENDA pp,-uJed FOR S=AaATE C2.NSIDEr"_:1ON AND ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Caraccioli Rezone Land Use 'searing Examiner Fred Kaufman's decision of 10/5/81 recommended approval with restrictive covenants for Rezone R-069-81 G to L-1 proposed warehouse and storage on west side of East Valley Road. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Councilman Stredicke inquired re location and moratorium, being advised by Public Works Director Houghton that property is located on the corner of SW 16th St. and East Valley Road, south of intersection on the west side of East Valley Rd. ; that the disclaimer and acknowledgment system replaced moratorium. City Attorney Warren advised that owners of the rezone property would be subject to City's present building regulations for permits, Environmental Review Committee, etc. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, REFER THE REZONE TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Comprehensive Letter from Acting Planning Director Clemens presented for Council's Plan for review and consideration, the recommendations of the Planning NE Quadrant Commission for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan in the Northeast Rentonarea; also including Planning Commission minutes of the pub- lic hearing on 9/24/81. The Commission recommended adoption of the Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan amendment, noting the Council may adopt, modify or reject the plan, that no public hear- ing is required, although one may be considered. Ordinance adoption is required to approve the amendment. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY ROCKHILL, REFER MATTER TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Council President Stredicke requested the Acting Planning Director to present previous correspondence on the NE Quadrant Comprehensive Plan. MOTION CARRIED. Monterey Terrace Letter from The Monterey Club, Monterey Terrace Community, Inez Street Resurfacing Kremer, President and Richard Houser, Past-President, thanked the City for paving of streets without inconvenience, and asked regarding time schedule for street markings. Councilman Rockhill noted striping now accomplished. Councilman Reed noted asphalt covered drains not yet chipped out, also noting South Renton done. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, REFER LETTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR REPLY. CARRIED. Emergency Sewer Letter from Public Works Director Houghton requested authorization Repairs due to for emergency expenditure for repair of sanitary sewer trunk line Rolling Hills break due to saturated portion of canyon wall below Thunderhill Trunk Line Break Apartments destroyed part of 12 inch trunk sewer. The letter noted temporary repairs were made immediately, however, it is imperative that proper emergency repairs are made. Estimated cost is $20,000; Thunderhill Apartments to share in cost; City share will be approxi- mately $13,600. The letter noted monies are available in the Utilities Fund. Moved by Clymer, Second by Rockhill, concur in request to make repairs. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, REFER MATTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. Council President Stredicke requested Vice-Chairman Clymer assume Utilities Committee Chairmanship.) SUBSTITUTE MOTION CARRIED. Upon inquiry, Houghton explained need to complete the work as rapidly as possible, noting heavy rains could cause problem, that contractor is ready to proceed. Meeting announced by Committee Chairman. See meeting schedule) . Appointmenv: Letter from Mayor Shinpoch advised of appointment of Richard Public Works Houghton to the position of Public Works Director, having been Director Acting Director since early January 1981. The letter explained Richard Houghton Houghton competed with 96 applicants through stringent testing including assessment center evaluation to be one of two top final- ists. Mayor Shinpoch determined the Acting Director was the most appropriate choice; having been with the City for 20 years and pro- gressing through the ranks from Draftsman to Asst. Civil Engineer, Head Surveyor, Office Engineer, Utility Engineer, Engineering Supervisor and Acting Director. Mayor Shinpoch requested Council Renton City Council 10/26/81 Page 4 Correspondence and Current Business - Continued Public Works concurrence in the appointment. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND HUGHES, Director COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPOINTMENT. Council President Stredicke in- Appointment quired re Northeast City sewer problems and Houghton explained Metro is planning to withdraw trunk funding proposal; Houghton to pursue and advise Council. Clymer inquired re earlier complaint re meter readers and advise of additional duties. MOTION CARRIED CONFIRMING APPOINTMENT. OLD BUSINESS Council President Stredicke inquired re status of parking at the Fifth and Park Building. Mayor Shinpoch recalled Council denied request for reduced size of stalls; Lt. Perssons noted the out building was being torn down per original plan so that parking requirements were being met. PS COG Councilman Hughes reported his attendance at special meeting last week of Puget Sound Council of Government with brain storming on items such as solid waste, energy, etc. Hughes will be reporting further. Community Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented committee Services report explaining 10/20 meeting to review status of public use Committee walkways in the City and recommended: (1) Public use walkways Tiffany Park not adjacent to dedicated roadways be discouraged in all future Walkway and residential plats; if circumstances exist which require walkway, Future developer must construct it with hard surface and specifications Walkways established by the Public Works Director. (2) The walkway in Tiffany Park between Index Ave. and Lake Youngs Way SE, should be improved with a cement surface and proper drainage system. The Administration should contact the residents of Tiffany Park to inform them that the improvements are necessary at a cost of approximately $5,000 and ascertain if residents are willing to participate in an L.I.D. or other funding mechanism to pay the construction costs. MOVED BY REED, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee Committee report recommending second and final reading of an ordinance Ordinance #3581 changing the zoning classification from G to B-1, property located Stewart Rezone 300 ft. north of NE Sunset Blvd. on west side of Duvall Ave. NE; R-067-81 known as the Vincent Stewart Rezone R-067-81. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Building/Sewer SECOND CLYMER, AMEND MOTION TO INCLUDE STATEMENT OF COUNCIL DETER- Moratorium MINING AREA EXEMPT FROM MORATORIUM, THAT NUMBER OF SEWER HOOKUPS Exemption TO DATE IS SUBSTANTIALLY LOWER THAN ALLOTTED 361. Public Works Director Houghton explained number of hookups to date and agreed remaining are "first come, first served" basis or without preference. City Attorney Warren confirmed legality of amendment. AMENDMENT CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED, ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. First Reading The committee recommended first reading of an ordinance appropri- ating $379,760 to Coulon Beach Construction Fund (IAC Grant) . Following reading, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Resolution #2427 The committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Gustafson Final approving the final plat of a subdivision located at the west side Plat FP-070-81 of Union Ave. NE at intersection of NE 10th St. ; knwon as the Art Gustafson FP-070-81. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Voucher Approval The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval for payment of Vouchers No. 36203 through No. 36453 in the amount of $408,812.71, having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services received or rendered. Machine Voids: #36198 - 36202. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, APPROVE VOUCHERS FOR PAYMENT. CARRIED. Renton City Council 10/26/81 Page 3 Consent Agenda - Continued Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, REMOVE ITEM 6.h. FROM AGENDA Approved FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION AND ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Caraccioli Rezone Land Use Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman's decision of 10/5/81 recommended approval with restrictive covenants for Rezone R-069-81 G to L-1 proposed warehouse and storage on the west side of E.Vallev Road. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Councilman Stredicke inquired re location and moratorium, being advised by Public Works Director Houghton that property is located on the corner of SW 16th St. and East Valley Road, south of intersection on the west side of East Valley Rd. ; that the disclaimer and acknowledgment system replaced moratorium. City Attorney Warren advised that owners of the rezone property would be subject to City's present building regulations for permits, Environmental Review Committee, etc. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, REFER THE REZONE TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS I1 Transamerica Transamerica hll Transamericaa7L.a. U[7 Title Insurance CompanyTitleServices Please address correspondence to the office checked below: MAIN AUBURN BALLARD BELLEVUEF's•. a:r 73:A.:..• t•r, r_ BOTMELL FEDERAL WAY C 35AE':^_ ' A.tpE-<E !•`S• t'Sa E::^r •.a,n E 33477 Pac,,.,H.,Sc 12a-:5 E 7!•^StE:^A.r a• .rs'. -. A,..-•- ::t.°'_-- Sr,...- :•:ee..;' E-c,14e3Sea`a t•.<_f-;- c 11:E E_=:r s B(:ne'• N<ff :• Faces Ns, Nv 56:G3 Be,2e.ee NA 9!^a- E:f-«-f E. r..,e ttA e6::6 (2SE E26.<E:f 17PE.E:6-aEEt 70E.63F San 2tt6)E2E S9)J r uTransamericaTitleInsuranceCo. , RENTON WEDGWOOD WEST SEATTLE33427PacificHighwaySouth227N .a—,A-e S 6:,E 3E•,A.e e E aiE: .NA.e 5FederalWayWA98003Frt•.455:EE Sea-a .. s: E Sea•:.e NA 9e-<E 17,E E:6-aE:f (7ff E2e26-+E2[ 120E 626,E,E. L J Your Order No. Our Order No. 694845 Caraccioli - Monnahan/Bailey PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Washington Land Title Association Form Amount Premium Sales Tax Total X ) Owner's standard coverage 63 , 000 . 00 273 . 00 14 . 74 $287 . 74 Purchaser's standard coverage Mortgagee's standard coverage Mortgagee's ALTA coverage Tax Registration Date: July 31 , 1981 at 8 : 00 A.M. Total 287 . 74 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording ofanyappropriatedocuments, its policy or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on this pre-liminary commitment that title to the property described herein is vested on the date shown above in JULIUS CARACCIOLI , as his separate estate ; subject only to the exceptions shown herein and the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policyform. This report and commitment shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the coverage specifiedherein. B • Description: That portion of Lots 8 , 9 , 10 , 49 , 50 and 51 in vacated Block 19ofC. D. Hillman ' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City ofSeattle , Division No . 1 , as per plat recorded in Volume 17 ofPlats , on page 74 , records of King County , lying West of the EastValleyFrontageRoad , as conveyed to the State of Washington bydeedrecordedunderRecordingNo . 5442597 ; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated Harriman Avenue adjoining ,which , upon vacation , attached to said property by operation of law; Situate in the County of King , State of Washington . continued - OTE: 1. Ins estigalioss s/r,s.!..'L, me.!. to drirrmine if lbrre art and srrt-ire, installation, maintenance, or LOnstrurticrs Oa,ges for seta er,ttalrr or electririt) CZ 2. In the (ten! Iles transaction fails to close. a cancellation fee will be charged for Jeri ices VC-g.-;:endued in arrord.:sn.t u itb our rale schedule. For Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of October 26, 1981 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn J. Petersen Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-069-81 ; Julius and Consent X Stella Caraccioli ; Rezone Request Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner' s Report, 10-5-81 Other B. C Approval : Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ N/A_ COUNCIL ACTION FECOMMENDED: Approval Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A_ with restrictive covenants Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Backgrcund information, prior action and effect cf implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The appeal period for the attached Examiner' s Report and Recommendation expired on October 19, 1981 , and the matter is hereby forwarded to the City Council for review and referral to the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of an ordinance. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 4 of the attached report. SUBM I THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. F R O THE CITY OF RENTON o „ *: z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o _ a)BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR o LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 10 FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235 -2593 09gTFD SEP " a October 22, 1981 M r. Larry Brown Western Pacific Properties 13975 Interurban Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98168 RE: File No. R-069-81 ; Julius and Stella Caraccioli . Dear 11 r. Brown : The Examiner 's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance from the City Clerk upon adoption by the Council . If further assistance or information is desired, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department 10: 412°1- w Ft f_ STEPAN &ASSOCIATES, Inc. U ( S' 4 ENGINEERING August 31, 19811\- ,1'N NG.2 Environment Review Committee City of Renton 200 S. Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: Carraccioli Rezone Application #R-069-81 Gentlemen: A study of the Springbrook drainage area concluded that 1080 acre feet of flood storage is required to maintain a 100-year flood elevation of 15 feet above mean sea level . Due to previous filling of the valley floor, the 1080 acre feet of storage may not be available. A study currently underway which will take months to complete will determine if the valley has the required storage. If the storage is not adequate, a new 100-year flood elevation (higher than 15 feet) will be determined. After talking to Wes Edins of the Federal Emergency Maintenance Agency, and Herb Young of King County Surface Water Management, I feel the following procedures are sufficient to prevent environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency could withdraw its Declaration of Significance and issue a Declaration of Non-Significance for this site. 1. The volume of flood storage that would be depleted by filling part of the site for the building pad would be compensated by excavating (below elevation of 15 feet) an equal volume of earth on the site. Using this method, the floodway fringe will not be modified and a computer model of the affects of this development will not have to be done. 2. I am sure a potential 100-year flood elevation can be agreed upon by Engineers at the above mentioned agencies and Renton Public Works to determine a reasonable finished flood elevation for the proposed building. The potential 100-year flood elevation would not likely raise more than one foot above the current 15 feet. Very truly yours, STEPAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Kent J. Stepan, P.E. President MAR/ggc 930 South 336th Street,Suite A • Federal Way,Washington 98003 • Tacoma:927-7850,Seattle:682-4771 • RNa A 6-NitBI\ '\\WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. c, ,. Commercial Brokerage Company 9.i \.. AUG 1981 August 31 , 1981 4,/ Mr. Roger Blaylock Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Street Renton , Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Blaylock: The purpose of this letter is to appeal the proposed Significant Declaration on Mr. Carraccioli ' s application for rezone #R 069-81 and ECF 074-81. It is our opinion that the limited development of this small site will not adversely affect the neighboring owners - either Austin Co. or Metro. The intended purchasers plan a future building of from 4000 to 6000 square feet with limited outside storage. This would occur sometime in the next year or two. Stepan and Associates has provided us with additional supporting information and documentation which is attached. We respectfully request that ERC grant a Declaration of Non-Signif- icance for this application. Sincerely, WESTERN PACIFIC PPOPERTIES, INC. Larry Brown LB/dt Enclosure 33838 Pacific Highway South • Federal Way, Washington 98003 • (206) 838-6070 • 624-1250 Caraccioli R-069-81 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Julius Caraccioli , as his separate property, is the owner of the following reEl property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Located in the SW 1/4 of Section 19-23-5, portions of lots 8, 9, 10 and all of 49, 5( and 51 of Hillman 's Earlington Gardens #1 , Volume 17, page 74 of plats in King County, Washington, together with that portion of vacated Harriman Avenue (91st Avenue South) . WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEFEFORE, the aforesaid owner hereby establishes, grants and imposes restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove cescribed with respect to the use by the undersigned, his successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : ZONING REQUIREMENTS Development cn the property must conform to all requirements of Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturinc Park District , of the City of Renton Zoning Code with the exception of rear yard one side yard setbacks . MAINTENANCE OF 100 YEAR FLOOD CAPACITY Maintenance cf the 100 year flood capacity shall be required on the subject site including the holding capacity of the soils and subsurface of the site; this requirement to be in effect until such time as such capacity is no longer necessary as a result of a change in flood hazard. DURATION These covenarts shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025, or such time as the Mood storage capacity required within this covenant is no longer necessary. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated b' either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys ' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. Ju44/111.492 l" s Caraccioli Page One of Two STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING f1 On this_\ day of D c 192;- 1, before me personally appeared Julius Caracc:ioli , the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the,,St te of Washington, residing in 2- AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 5th day of October 1981 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. d%ejeefy," —e—,t, i De Subscribed and sworn th i s es day of All.-' 19 J c— Notary Public in and for Sta of Washington, residing at Application, Petition or Case: Julius & Stella Caraccioli ; R-069-81 The minute% contain a U6t o6 the pahtia 06 n.econd. ) October 5, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Julius and Stella Caraccioli FILE NO. R-069-81 LOCATION: West side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street. SUMMARY OF REQJEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse and material storage uses. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with restrictive covenants. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with restrictive covenants. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on September 16, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on September 22, 1981 at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Responding to the Examiner' s inquiry regarding proposed fill operations on the property, Mr. Blaylock advised that the area designated for construction of a building will be required to be filled. The Examiner noted that most of the lots surrounding the site previously rezoned to an L-1 designation had contained 6,000 square feet; however, because the subject site contains 32,000 square feet, he inquired if there was any reason why a rezone to the Manufacturing Park classification was not proposed. Mr. Blaylock explained that due to the narrow configuration of the lot, maneuverability space for large trucks could not be provided under the side and rear yard setback requirements of the M-P zone. A concern was expressed by the Examiner that elimination of side yard requirements would result in lack of provision of landscaping to buffer the site from adjoining lots. Mr. Blaylock stated that adjacent properties located to the north, south and west of the site are zoned L-1 and H-1 , respectively, and are not in comp) iance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Larry Brown Western Pacific Properties 13975 Interurban Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98168 Mr. Brown advised concurrence in the staff report recommendations. He strongly supported approval of a rezone to the L-1 classification rather than the M-P zone in order to utilize the site to its fullest potential . He requested that if and when the P-1 Channel is constructed or other measures taken for provision of storm drainage facilities in the valley, a mechanism be included in restrictive covenants to remove the requirement for an equal amount of excavation for purposes of flood control in order to assure that the restriction does not run with the land even after measures have been taken by the city or county to mitigate the storm drainage problem. Responding to the Examiner' s inquiry regarding imposition of restrictive covenants at the rezone stage, Mr. Blaylock confirmed the Planning Department's intent for execution of the document as part of rezone approval . The Examiner requested clarification of the fill R-069-81 Page Two process, and asked if the applicant would be required to excavate one foot over an equal square footage if the site were filled one foot over a certain square footage. Mr. Blaylock ' advised that if the applicant were to bring in 10,000 cubic yards of fill , he would have to excavate an area below flood level to accommodate displaced water. The Examiner inquired regarding the responsibility for calculation of the formula if impermeable surfaces are installed on the site. The intent of the Planning Department to require a general rather than specific restrictive covenant was discussed by Mr. Blaylock, who noted that the covenant would contain a general formula to require existing flood storage to be maintained on the site through the fill and excavation process. The formula would subsequently be calculated at the time of the fill permit application. The Examiner requested further comments. Mr. Blaylock advised that the department would not object to execution of restrictive covenants which would allow deletion of flood storage requirements at the time the P-1 Channel is constructed. Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. R-069-81 was closed by the Examiner at 9:21 a.m. FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a reclassification of approximately 32,520 square feet of property from G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) to L-1 (Light Industry) . 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. Utilities will have to be extended to the subject site. 7. The subject property is located on the west side of the East Valley Road about 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street. Immediately east of the East Valley Road is SR-167. 8. The subject site was annexed into the city by Ordinance No. 1745 in April of 1959, at which time the current G classification was applied. 9. The site is level and is located in the northern extreme of the Green River Valley. The site is located within the Federal Emergency Management Agency flood fringe. 10. The uses in the vicinity are generally industrial or manufacturing park type uses. The area to the north is in transition from old single family dwellings to commercial and industrial uses. 11 . The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of manufacturing parks. The site is also within the orbit of the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, and screening and site review are recommended to provide compatible and aesthetic working environments. 12. The area has a mix of industrial zoning. Immediately north is an L-1 property, the classification requested by the applicant. South and west of the subject site is an H-1 (Heavy Industry) zone. South of S .W. 19th Street is a large G zone. 13. Much of the area has been filled pursuant to grade and fill permits. The subject site would have to be filled to bring it above the flood level for this area. 14. The subject lot is about 270 feet deep by 120 feet wide, and the requirements of the M-P (Manufacturing Park) zone would require 20 foot side yard setbacks. The applicant would be left with 80 feet of buildable width. 15. The Planning Department recommended that the site be classified to L-1 to provide less stringent sideyard setback requirements. They indicated that the 60-foot front setback 111 R-069-81 Page Three should be required. 16. The Declaration of Non-Significance requires that the 1n0-year flood potential of the site be mairtained. This would be accomplished by removing a like amount of material from the site as has been used to fill the site. This would not account for the loss of ground at sorption caused by the covering of the site with impermeable surfaces such as paving and structures. 17. There have heen a number of rezones of property to L-1 in the areas surrounding the subject site. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proponelt of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will no: impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3014 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed rezone as conditioned below satisfies the above enumerated criteria. 2. The subjec: site is located within a developing industrial area and is no longer suitable fmr residential development. The site has good access to the major highway network no-th and east of the property and will provide an appropriate location for an industrial operation. 3. The size of the lot constrains the applicant from reasonably utilizing the lot to advantage if all the setbacks imposed by the M-P zone were to be required; therefore, it seems reasonable to permit the lot to be reclassified to L-1 , a category which allows many of the manufacturing park uses, and impose restrictions of the M-P zone to make the development compatible with both the Comprehensive Plan and the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. 4. The 60-foct setback will not be overly burdensome since the lot is quite deep compared 10 its width. The property should also be screened as required by the M-P zone, and subject to a site approval review prior to development to assure fidelity to the various comprehensive plans. 5. Since the property is located within the flood fringe as currently defined by FEMA,the ERC issued the Declaration of Non-Significance for the site subject to provision of flood storage capacity equal to the 100-year flood calculations. The recommendation to assure such capacity is that the applicant excavate an amount of material from thesiteequaltotheamountoffillrequiredtoprovideasafebuildingfoundationheight.Since this formula ignores the current holding capacity of the ground which would be lost after coverage of the site with impermeable surfaces, the applicant should be required to add capacity equal to the lost quantity. 6. Subject to the conditions indicated above, the reclassification of the subject property should prove to be in the public interest, and as the neighboring properties are similarly zoned, there will be no adverse effect on those properties. RECOMMENDAT I Ott: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject request from G to L-1 subject to the following conditions: 1 . The appl cant to execute restrictive covenants to abide by all of the requirements of the M-P !one with the exception of rear yard and side yard setbacks. 2. The applicant to execute covenants to maintain the 100 year flood capacity of thesubjectsiteincludingtheholdingcapacityofthesoilsandsubsurfaceofthesite;the covenant as to flood storage capacity shall only be in effect until such time as this capacity is no longer necessary as a result of a change in flood hazard. R-069-81 Page Four ORDERED THIS 5th day of October, 1981 . Fred J. Kau an Land Use Hea ing Exa iner TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of October, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Larry Brown, Western Pacific Properties, 13975 Interurban Ave. S. , Seattle, WA 98168 TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of October, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman and Members , Planning Commission Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the city' s code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before October 19, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner' s decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. i Val p col i1 LIML;1 1'.-.- \ ., , 1 • Zi I ' J_/'G . II I I $-1, I I 111 H i i I ; ; I 1 I, Ta.g I Ob vgti AGE a I-est.' . . . e . r4104 ii ois , 0 j.,r dour i i` r : ter^ys j _ - • 7 Ligt- N ilijIlLit/1 . MINT7 ::' I ., - \'\' ) '‘ A 0 1.0??..-:- 11- 4 4„Nutit 1%I. i.‘‘ IMP . G16000 - y' -t, I o a - 17_-. w` _-- r , t k44 :;JI _ yf'` n co k IJ Gs [- A 1 C z Mitt is J' ..-— '>. • •y it M — J/y 44 C 1 ice ' *- li 1 j I I I R-f w _ i j , I i G-9 oa CARACCIOLI , JULIUS & STELLA, R-069-81 APPLICANT CARACCIOLI, JULIUS & STELLA TOTAL AREA + 32,520 square feet PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via East Valley Road EXISTING ZONING "G" General Classification District EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Future Office, Warehouse & Material -Storage Uses Light Industrial; H-1 , Heavy IndustrialCOMPREHENSIVELANDUSEPLAN L-1 , COMMENTS Yam. f ' '4111 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 22 , 1981 APPLICANT: CARACCIOLI , JULIUS & STELLA FILE NUMBER: R-069-81 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G" to L-1 for future office, warehouse, and material storage uses. B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record: Carraccioli, Julius 2. Applicant : Carraccioli, Julius Stella. 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) West side of East Valley Road approximately 320 ' south of S.W. 16th Street. 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: 32, 520 square feet. 6. Access :Via East Valley Road. 7. Existing Zoning: G" , General Classification District, Minimum lot size 35 ,000 square feet. 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area: L-1 , Light Industrial; H-1 , Heavy Industrial. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on September 7 , 1981 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on September 3, 1981 . C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 of April 14 , 1959 at which time the present zoning classification was applied. PRELIMINARY RE TO THE HEARING EXAMINECARRACCIOLI , J S & STELLA SEPTEMBER 22 , 19 1 PAGE TWO D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site is level. 2. Soils: Puget silty clay loam (Pu) . Permeability is moderately rapid. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. Stream overflow is a slight to severe hazard depending on the amount of flood protection provided. This soil is used for row crops and pasture and for urban development. 3. Vegetation: The site consists principally of grass and scrub brush. 4 . Wildlife: The existing vegetation may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5 . Water: The subject site is located within the FEMA flood fringe designation. Noe surface water was observed on the subject site. (September 11 , 1981 ) 6. Land Use: Although the subject site and adjacent properties are largely undeveloped, substantial filling operations are underway to the north, west, and south. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties consist principally of land utilized for industrial purposes or in the process of being prepared for such activity. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A sixteen-inch water main extends east-west on S.W. 19th Street wihtin one-fourth-- mile to the south of the subject site while an eight-inch sanitory sewer runs north-south on the East Valley Road approximately one-half mile south. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton. as per ordinance requirement. 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #156 operates along SR 167 to the east of the subject site. 4 . Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729, "G" ; General Classification District. 2 . Section 4-712 , L-1 ; Light Industry District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Comprehensive Plan, Green River Valley, June 1976 , Goals and Objectives. PRELIMINARY R TO THE HEARING EXAMINE CARRACCIOLI , US & STELLA SEPTEMBER 22, 1981 PAGE THREE I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will distrub the soils , remove the vegetation, increase storm water runoff and cause an increase in traffic and noise levels in the area. However, through propert development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated. 2. Population/Employment: These impacts can be better addressed at the time of future development. 3. Schools : Not applicable. 4 . Social: Minor. 5. Traffic : These impacts can be better addressed at the time of future development. J. ENVIRONNENTAL ASSESS'/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, the ERC on September 7 , 1981 , issued a declaration of non-significance for the subject proposal. The declaration of non-significance is based upon the applicant' s proposal to not change the flood stage on the site due to any proposed development. K. AGENCIES/DEPART TS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALDCSIS: 1 . The proposed rezone to Light Industrial is not directly in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site. However, the City has approved a number of rezones in the vicinity to Light Industrial subject to restrictive covenants designed to be compatible with the objectives of the Valley Comprehensive Plan. These rezones include Ordinance 3469 (September, 1980) and Ordinance 3482 (November, 1981 ) . See applicant ' s letter of justification for additional rezones. These actions would indicate that the subject site is potentially zoned for the L-1 classification being sought. [Section 4-3014-C (la & 1b) . 2. The subject site is in an area which is in transition from older single family residence and undeveloped properties to commercial/industrial uses. Properties to the west have either been filled extensively or are in the process of being so in preparation for similar uses . 3 . Although no specific site plan has been submitted with the proposed rezone, the applicant indicates future plans for a +4000-6000 square foot building office and warehousing) together with limited outdoor storage (screened) . PRELIMINARY RE TO THE HEARING EXAMINE CARRACCIOLI , JLS & STELLA SEPTEMBER 22 , 1981 PAGE FOUR 4 . Previous rezones to L-1 in the vicinity have been accompanied by restrictive covenants in the form of setbacks, landscaping, and screening (Lewis, Dahlby) . These sites, however, were located adjacent to residentially used and/or zoned parcels of property. The subject site is not and therefore such restrictive measures may not be completely appropriate. In addition, the long, narrow shape of the property limits development based solely upon M-P zone standards. A viable alternative could be the requirement for a sixty foot (60 ' ) front yard setback (from the East Valley Road) and L-1 zone setback on the remaining yards . This would permit utilization of the side and rear yards for storage and warehousing (as proposed by the applicant) and still allow for construction of the building; while automobile parking could be provided in the required front yard. 5. The Engineering Division advises that the subject site is in the flood zone and that any future filling will eliminate necessary flood water storage area. Because of this potential and the uncertain timetable for future construction of the P-1 Channel, it is imperative that the applicant provide suitable assurance that any filling or grade activity will be accompanied by provision of a like amount of area on-site appropriate for flood water storage. This is also part of the decision of the ERC in issuing the declaration of non-significance. 6. . Water line and sanitary sewer line extensions will be required at the time of future development as per Utilities Engineering Division comment. Late- comer ' s agreements for water and sewer must also be provided as well as water and sewr plans. A community facilities charge for water will apply and fire hydrant locations will require approval by the Fire Department. 7 . Future building construction shall meet all city codes and the requirements of the Fire Marshall. 8. Participation in the LID for the East Valley Road will be required as per Traffic Engineering Division comment. 9. The Police Department indicates that future buildings should have an adequate security system consisting of an alarm, locks, and lighting. M. DEPARTMENTAL RE6OMMENDATION; : Based upon the above analysis , recommended approval of the rezone request subject to the satisfaction of items L-4 through L-9. Annininn. 5 `_f/,- r -- 1r— t ti nl•`-- I fin 1<C; 10 r I I ! rasa LJ I I E LIR., 'J.:1'..,-‘-':. C.'". ; 121 1----- la.P" i NI,. 1 i we N A i OZI------ ----- j c."101iI Illllllllllhylla I H— IOCR111111111/ 11 I NE t s'!' liil MI 1 11111111111 r-t ; SPT M 4111111! b Illlfsi II' ii-II i Nei t nullnor-Ajop '. n IT T'M III N„1„ I,' ri-.-0....."11IF .1111&I'NI j. 0 i - al `ifoi In . 11; 'I11111111 rj' 1L OW ii 11,p tad , ql a; em ' - 1 30 l 1 r I ` p ii 0 ,.,"*" T . .. or......"- - • . i° firMAIO r - - ' IN,: ava : ; : s# 11—mawL 1.ems-1773 , _ ,if _. •„„ -7-,r,...... _, ,.. , _ _„ a 7 7.,_, 1 _ mp:i - - -60 00 iv: __-__ i- trI,-', 4:::..._•-.._- -_-! .7::.7..:.. .7C17-_-.1 _,--,. - S...tr-.T.3&___ApThe i .-. -' 4-6 -••-- 4 74.— ‘ . f -141 - t-.--L-L ' ' " fo 44 k il. it . . iL { caws_ A i AAA_ r 0.- .-!.• , r I i. iiIn k T I • r---- 'Y OL J-NM N R_ kk r-1 G t. I' r' pa. er. F lel 7,, p ii[4 1 1 eI 1 .1 r CARACCIOLI , JULIUS & STELLA, R-069-81 ADPLICANT CARACCIOLI, JULIUS & STELLA TOTAL AREA + 32 , 520 square fe PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via East Valley Road EXISTING ZONING "G" General Classification District EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Future Office, Warehouse & Material -Storage Uses COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN L-1 , Light Industrial; H-1 , Heavy Industria COMMENTS rcevrarun 3/ i or 0 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: Reis eeR-QL?-- bej4 lope7.•te sift.Oro.. Ill A/../ 1,r elpii,rc oft'4 et tat stAttill eak`ri a Idiafrie_fises_____ Location iiii Vie ala pi'RI•r,,, , 3aots.. desteigtiLst, Applicant: Ca r cc ®b .lf1kUifi1•s7414 111.Dub] Works Department E]Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: S/N$) Traff' n Division SCHEDULED NEARING DATE: 9//5/8/ s [ar lities :ng. Division 04' re Department 0 Parks Department . 0 wilding Department E] Police Department 0 Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI ING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. azs/131 REVIEWING 7::&E. Approved proved with Conditions J Not Approved 7u 'l E 311 /L/3/4/G' Ccjn)s7 C 43/0 1/4C/071u_ / -ec,-5cr 14_ C l y K2,S cl t//e6 /14.7 ,/' . /2_ Qu/r'c 6'- y DATE: 8/5- /8/ Stgn.3tur•e- of Director or tut rized Representative REVIEWING DEPART?LENT/DIVISION: Approved 134proved with Conditions [] Not Approved 2,,t 1-, ex.Y. -&------L-4--- j 06--A-1-1-10 l it r i , rr 4.4..„, F6. ,. 72-LiA-t-t4a. &.(-.1.4,) 0 DATE: S- ?- 87 Signature of Iirector or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMEIFIVISION: POLICE DEPT El Approved La Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved 1) Improve E.Vally Road 2) Buildings should be required to have adequate security system; i .1 alarm, locks, lighting t. .R. Persson DATE: 8.,E-4/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: A'1/f"//C L I'1c //VI_ ( k'J/l1'(. Approved r 'pproved with Conditions [J Not Approved L 1 z.r I , c. , • e: 7tzJ___.,DATE: 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative f_tiedREVIEWINGDEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 0 Approved 0 Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved F7012-65-‘,...-... 4.-----.../.7.44--- jr....02,-..c._ /4f IA.l.c.......) c"..r...tE L_ DATE: P-4,3/SI Signature of Director or uthorized Rep esentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: --.L M Approved 0 Approved with Conditions El Not Approved s 2 csC. 4-= DATE: O ,gl Signs ie of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved El Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved DATE: FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : R-069-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-074-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse and material storage use. Proponent : CARRACCIOLI , JULIUS STELLA Location of Proposal : West side of E Valley Road approximately 320' south of S.W. 16th Street. Lead Agency: PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on September 2, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson , Richard Houghton, David Clemens, Roger Blaylock, Steve Munson , Gary Norris, Michael Parness, Jeanette Samek, Donald Persson, and Ken Walls. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-074-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: August 10, 1981 2) Applications : R-069-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Fire Department and Police Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined ' this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43 . 21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1 . Complies with the Comprehensive Plan 2. The present 100 year flood storage capacity of the site will be maintained. Signatures : i Y/ tonaZrkee--e) Nelson vid R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director ar C. Ho g t Acting Public Works Dire . or DATE OF PUBLICATION : September 7, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: Septe,uuer 21 , 1981 S. O NTIrirTAtM U Tn tanCHEAT1AAEENEMT • TTITEA WIMPMIRE • REI!f1S_ ,e SYSTEMstiEtipNNtCNAACE • aiiFit SftTE klttlplrN1CUI . t,tnp WC* UU$sNIENrMICAME • xArEAEVIII IIIIIIIIN URNiwnME#rAREACN*ICE • SEVER APPIInE1VITflpU. APPNInrIVNEIPLAN APPIITEAFIRENTAAANTMINIS ITRifDEBT. Es Filf1so' 110t1. M l STEPAN&ASSOCIATES, Inc. J„6 s" A J ENGINEERING August 31 , 1981 Environment Review Committee City of Renton 200 S. Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: Carraccioli Rezone Application #R-069-81 Gentlemen: A study of the Springbrook drainage area concluded that 1080 acre feet of flood storage is required to maintain a 100-year flood elevation of 15 feet above mean sea level . Due to previous filling of the valley floor, the 1080 acre feet of storage may not be available. A study currently underway which will take months to complete will determine if the valley has the required storage. If the storage is not adequate, a new 100-year flood elevation (higher than 15 feet) will be determined. After talking to Wes Edins of the Federal Emergency Maintenance Agency, and Herb Young of King County Surface Water Management, I feel the following procedures are sufficient to prevent environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency could withdraw its Declaration of Significance and issue a Declaration of Non-Significance for this site. 1. The volume of flood storage that would be depleted by filling part of the site for the building pad would be compensated by excavating (below elevation of 15 feet) an equal volume of earth on the site. Using this method, the floodway fringe will not be modified and a computer model of the affects of this development will not have to be done. 2. I am sure a potential 100-year flood elevation can be agreed upon by Engineers at the above mentioned agencies and Renton Public Works to determine a reasonable finished flood elevation for the proposed building. The potential 100-year flood elevation would not likely raise more than one foot above the current 15 feet. Very truly yours, STEPAN b ASSOCIATES, INC. i/ Kent J. Stepan, P.E. ; President MAR/ggc 930 South 336th Street,Suite A • Federal Way,Washington 98003 • Tacoma:927-7850,Seattle:682-4771 • i s ion 3/1981 '( 744tr, 411P RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: Re2E(Re20/4/E6?-40-16)Rel e0s140te7one3//e 166'1 `egor 6fvrc t'sr rei4>i j J114a i.lA,rO jr USPs j 1 Location S/e Ds,E mil.,Rd. 3ao'$. ciesw/ C7t• Applicant: Cr .cci oils Zl , juc r c7TQ/t ii a, I ZQ:Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 9//.2/g/ Traffi -Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 9//5/8/ tilities :rig. Division 1 re Department ElParks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI ING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON ii REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: --7---77 Approved proved with Conditions Not Approved U Tom - ! W /Z/0/A/C Ce/AvLE7;e- GiL6ov S'417 — /'-'- GL Cc l L/ CL YJ S J`"/2C` /`ime / G ,,e2- --qC„,i/e'6_``-( "-7--„S 7 DATE: S /8/ Signature of Director or Aut rized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: El Approved EApproved with Conditions :pot Approved tjeuttAit 24.-t-t--va-t--A."- 42.-er..-- 1.1--.b.a., - -6----:-,-4-' 1-4--a"--4-21014A-z- 4f"A- - 7" 4 -1 i"_._ _ t t i i t I 0 t c C-U t--e---1,41---Val---- J DATE: S- 7— g/ Signature of irector or Authorized Representative S LIBAL APPROVAL SOB1ECi TO LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER W_535 Y4-5.LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEY?tR s_9 yesSYSTEMDEVELOPMENTCHARGErs;FR SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CRAM ?ATER A/4.SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE SEWER NSA APPROVED WATER PLAN YesAPPROVEDSEWERPLAN APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS yes BY FIRE DEPT. s FIRE ILL?' II4TlY vision 3/1981 G( y/3/ IIP RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: R *.VtRezmarkog4p8),',c'e% pe7.ne Si f e ao..4 (Ii" 1-1 iiitc setietareAo use, mallerialArdtre uses Location SII 0re a ilallo /I• do x ,, 34,1o'S Vim/ / Applicant:_ C.2r/LLGi O/ JiJ u1 i•ore% Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 8//1/s/ Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 9//c/8/ Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department 0 Parks Department Bu' sing Department Ij Police Department El Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI!NG.PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE DEPT. Approved LI Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved 1) Improve E.Vally Road 2) Buildings should be required to have adequate security system; i .e. alarm, locks, lighting t. R. Persson DATE: 8/4/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved []Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative vision 3/1981 r.( 7/V 5, 4IP RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: PedZOA/FeA,Qg'Pat)AOSie. s40pez. tet Ye 61tu i 14)&j4r r4 Wit eiwereh0 use/!AM idt'riddSterdijt uses Location Mae re 614.0.1.PI. tyor•it . 3do'S• Of Sw /g fr. Applicant: Car/LGCi a/i Zli(iUs 1 c ie/4 El;Public Works Department Engi ing Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 8/11/8i raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 5//5/8/ Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department El Building Department 12 Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI ING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Q4¢Ff/C NC ,fV L C k'/lU C Approved pproved with Conditions 0 Not Approved sli DATE: ?/ ' /'67 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved []Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative or vision 3/1981 rr 1101 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: REjgA/F(R-D6e?-19)Al yeast 7e Pe 7.44e S:lit RIFO«4 6`If qIP, 4. feibtf_tiet.4et.14141rehlUse1 l Adderia-I_Stbrote uses Location:141 sae Arec vapor#21. dirk,.x . 3ao'S• of 5iiJ/g tfi $t. Applicant: rer#,LCi 4Ij Zlius 1 SISAL 1 El;OPubii orks Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: SP1f8I Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: q//S/Ri Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Building Department 0 Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI ING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON iiaslsty REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved F'v:IP—e-A5—eA.... (....----5.,,,--,e______ ,,t":„..i.L...... c„.„,....te 2.---DATE: g/a/e7 Signature of Director or uthorized Rep esentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved []Approved with Conditions ONot Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative sion 3/1981 8(7" gi RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: kezo l/F(Q-D L9-ves te zone se//e 4« (I •' 1'14 1r tg Tu/C deluge/Wer h.usei fm Serm./ to,a pe uses Location sjle p'f E. vJ.,#2d.4j/x . 3ao'S. a'Sk1/6 .Sf. Applicant: CeriLGGi oli Zls1 us gr•Jfe/4 T0 : Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: i//1/0/ Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 9//S/RI Utilities Eng. Division El Fire Department Parks Department uilding Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON is/8/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: frlY a Approved Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved DATE: Signs '5f Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1981 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1 . BLOOD, DURWOOD E. Application for rezone from R-1 to R-2 to permit future construction of ten townhouse condominium units, file R-001-81 ; property located on the south side of N. E. 14th Street approximately 130 feet west of Edmonds Avenue N.E. 2. CARACCIOLI , JULIUS AND STELLA Application for rezone from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse, and material storage uses, file R-069-81 ; property located on the west side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street. 3. CHURCH OF CHRIST Application for special permit to allow a 1200 square feet addition to existing church and landscaping, paving, and parking improvements in an R-3 zone, file SP-071-81 ; property located in the vicinity of 2527 N. E. 12th Street between Edmonds Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N. E. 4 . BITNEY, DEAN W. Applications for 4-lot single family residential short plat in G zone, file 074-81 , and waiver of off-site improvements, file W-075-81 ; property located west side of Union Avenue S.E. adjacent to south annex of Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1981 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: September 7, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , Steve Munson, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED. ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 44dday of September, 1981 . L' /- SIGNED:GNE','- t SIGNED: JikaedwbtLe“Orot 110 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : R-069-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-074-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse and material storage use. Proponent : CARRACCIOLI , JULIUS STELLA Location of Proposal : West side of E Valley Road approximately 320' south of S.W. 16th Street. Lead Agency: PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on September 2, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson, Richard Houghton, David Clemens, Roger Blaylock, Steve Munson, Gary Norris , Michael Parness, Jeanette Samek, Donald Persson, and Ken Walls. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-074-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: August 10, 1981 2) Applications : R-069-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Fire Department and Police Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1 . Complies with the Comprehensive Plan 2. The present 100 year flood storage capacity of the site will be maintained. Signatures : jt// ,, Zfe,4V-2 7 onald G. Nelson vid R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director AO R' hard C. Ho gfit Acting Public Works Dire or DATE OF PUBLICATION: September 7, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: September 21 , 1981 OF R4,-IP 0 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U `$ © Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 nemIL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 94 23i— 2550 0, 9q7.ED SEPI O September 3, 1981 Julius and Stella Caraccioli 21822 84th Avenue South Kent, Washington 98031 Re: Application for rezone from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse and material storage uses; property located on the west side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street. Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on July 31 , 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for September 22, 1981 at 9 : 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , 97d31-1‘11A Roger J. glaY loc Associate Planner RJB:cl cc : Larry Brown Western Pacific Properties, Inc. 33838 Pacific Highway South Federal Way, Washington 98003 Kent J. Stepan, P.E. Stephan & Associates, Inc. 930 South 336th Street, Suite A Federal Way, Washington 98003 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: 1. CARRACCIOLI, JULIUS AND STELLA (ECF-074-81) Application for rezone from G to L-1 to allow for future office, warehouse and material storage use, file R-069-81; property located on the west side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street. 2. CASS, BRUCE (ECF-077-81) Application for building permit, file B-260, to construct a professional office building; property located on the southwest corner of Rainier Ave. North and N.W. 3rd Place. 3. COUNTRY HILLS APARTMENTS (ECF-081-81) Application for variance from Sign Ordinance to install sand blasted sign of 100 square feet, file B-262; property located on the northwest corner of Eagle Ridge Drive and Benson Road. The Environmental Review Committee has further considered and modified their decision regarding the following final declaration of non-significance with regard to condi- tions: 1. TERRA NORTHWEST HOMES, INC. (ECF-076-81) Application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of seven (7) duplex units (Cottage Lane) in a P-1 zone, file CU-072-81, and variance to permit variable setback within the required twenty foot (20' ) setback, file V-073-81; property located on the west side of Monroe Avenue N.E. between Sir Cedric Condominiums and the Seventh Day Adventist Church. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has also issued a declaration of signifi- cance for the following project: 1. PICKLE, LYLE (ISLE LAKE MOUNTAIN VIEW) (ECF-069-81) Application for site approval, file SA-061-81, to allow construction of 188 dwelling unit condominiums to be known as Isle Lake Mountain View in B-1 zone; property located on the west side of Lincoln Ave. N.E. and south of N.E. 44th Street. Further information regarding these actions is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by September 21, 1981. Published: September 7, 1981 174.1. .-.4:‘,1,e,'',. . ;.1,','' - .4-., - ,.,-...:. •, ,*: ,, , • , ..,,,,.,:, : f.. ,, k.k.!7, . 2,,•:', -_,;,t H , : 1,,,,•,-.,. ,, A. r .•3 I• •P., :,,-_,?!,T L ,..„ . 1 . i:, re:—t,.z: ..,,,;.,:-,,,,:. — Ai.,>,1:.:.'.' 5'7','",' •': •-•':' ';•,- ..” .1, j...".1 rj I:''',Ye :'-,.' -1 " 7 • ,' '.;:-0.." ': ' ',', 4 .17c;:, i ,•,.. 4 '.',. •• •,•, . P ,.. A V..,,. ! f.-''' • GENERAL LOCATiON: ,41-:'...,a, OH ADORES3: PROPERT": LOCATED NEST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD APPROXIMATELY 320 FEET OUTI1 OF S.W. 1TH STREET LWAL C iESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 41i, ..,-,.''•',/,...'''...'...- .f.''''''':' '''..-.,'..:-..''.;:.-;::: ,..k':.:'t'`,:...,,,:*...,,-'4:-:,,, , ,--::::** Iifitf:t.',. 6,4: ..* „ . .., ,.. - '. .- - "''', ' .,;.;:, -,,''''C* .7•.:* ..' *' ' .:.,4:;kw: A'' - A` it' S POSTI70 TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF EARIN ,,,,0 Ai 4. .,' , TO BE HELD IN CITY CeCIL CHAMBERS MUNICIPAL BUILDING Or SLPTEMBER 22, 1981 BEGINNING AT 9..00 A.M. P.M1111.6.**********001*****WOMIOOMMMIPMM.4 01 -,,CONCE4Ri !SIG ITEM if:',462.,i,..c...: , . G ro L-1 (R-069-81.,R4 , 110itaikre r--1 Q P r rag A:or.-sumiToice. Mao w it 4\3 °, 0(/# 04411k.! 11(1 SITE APPROVAL Ce 0 WAIVER LJS}i FINAL DECLARATION OF NON—SIGNIFICANCE (ECF-074-81) I DIRECT APPEALS TO HEARING EXAMINER NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 21 , 1981 FOR FURThER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 I\OT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPFH ALITHOREZATiON WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. Co,nwcrcial Brokerage Company August 31 , 1981 Mr. Roger Blaylock Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Street Renton , Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Blaylock: The purpose of this letter is to appeal the proposed Significant Declaration on Mr. Carraccioli 's application for rezone #R 069-81 and ECF 074-81. It is our opinion that the limited development of this small site will not adversely affect the neighboring owners - either Austin Co. or Metro. The intended purchasers plan a future building of from 4000 to 6000 square feet with limited outside storage. This would occur sometime in the next year or two. Stepan and Associates has provided us with additional supporting information and documentation which is attached. We respectfully request that ERC grant a Declaration of Non-Signif- icance for this application. Sincerely, WESTERN PACIFIC PPOPERTIES , INC. gAnA-j-440—vwJ I Larry Brown LB/dt Enclosure 33838 Pacific Highway South • Federal Way, Washington 98003 • (206) 838-6070 • 624-1250 U Et 5 STEPAN &ASSOCIATES, Inc. v ' ENGINEERING August 31 , 1981 Environment Review Committee City of Renton 200 S. Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: Carraccioli Rezone Application #R-069-81 Gentlemen: A study of the Springbrook drainage area concluded that 1080 acre feet of flood storage is required to maintain a 100-year flood elevation of 15 feet above mean sea level . Due to previous filling of the valley floor, the 1080 acre feet of storage may not be available. A study currently underway which will take months to complete will determine if the valley has the required storage. If the storage is not adequate, a new 100-year flood elevation (higher than 15 feet) will be determined. After talking to Wes Edins of the Federal Emergency Maintenance Agency, and Herb Young of King County Surface Water Management, I feel the following procedures are sufficient to prevent environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency could withdraw its Declaration of Significance and issue a Declaration of Non-Significance for this site. 1. The volume of flood storage that would be depleted by filling part of the site for the building pad would be compensated by excavating (below elevation of 15 feet) an equal volume of earth on the site. Using this method, the floodway fringe will not be modified and a computer model of the affects of this development will not have to be done. 2. I am sure a potential 100-year flood elevation can be agreed upon by Engineers at the above mentioned agencies and Renton Public Works to determine a reasonable finished flood elevation for the proposed building. The potential 100-year flood elevation would not likely raise more than one foot above the current 15 feet. Very truly yours, STEPAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Kent J. Stepan, P.E. , President MAR/ggc 930 South 336th Street,Suite A • Federal Way,Washington 98003 • Tacoma:927-7850,Seattle:682-4771 • Transamer Transamerica InsuranceTitle Insurance Title Services i 33427 Pacific Hi a uth Federal Way,Washington 9800;, l 208)838-3411 l07. DATE August 14 , 1981 City of Renton ESCROW # 01-11-694845-4 Planning Department 200 Mill. Avenue South YOUR REFERENCE # Caraccioli - Monahan/ Renton , WA 98055 Bailey ATTN : Roger Blaock PROPERTY ADDRESS Vacant Land PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CHECKED ITEMS CAREFULLY : IX 1 Enclosed is your copy of the Preliminary Title Report in connection i with tre above referenced transaction which we are closing•. Please advise me of what arrangements you will be making for fire insurance coverage prior to the closing date as we will need a fire insurance binder before the closing date . l I Please complete and have notarized the attached Statement of Identity then return the statement to us as soon as possible so that we may clarify paragraph(s) of the Preliminary Title Report on page (s) It is cur understanding that the closing date for this transaction has X been tentatively scheduled for 0ctob'r 30 , 1981 Please advise us as soon as possible if this approximate date is changed. We will contact you several days before this tentatively scheduled closing date , in order to let you know the exact amount of funds needed for closing, which must be in the form of a CASHIER' S CHECK. Please contact us when the percolation test has been done and the status of same. Thank you, 1 / fi & r, - Nina Kern x r('r"!°</~ , Escrow Officer C.. / (.r/J L` , . 1 C G . 21K;k1s i( SUS 1 Enclost.res 7. k- I a Transamerica #Transamerica IIIII Title Services Title Insurance CompanyIIPPleaseaddresscorrespondencetotheofficecheckedbelow: r MAIN AUBURN BALLARD BELLEVUE BOTHELL FEDERAL WAY FACTORIAPa,P 237 A-: v.a.`: CO:•f•-A,c t.V. 1DE'g E.E 6•^S, 175:e Ecl^e.Na r:6t^A.e a•V-.r,•,S• A: •.A ee_-: Sr s•r :•: Ef'•' Ec,tA 3 E . c, Ga., a Sc teae S E 9 SiSee— c.A>f•;• (2•e 61c. rE 4-c `- - E e.,,r Y.A e c e o•ner Wu 96.•1 ieoe•a'Ns, WA 9ED:3 Bene.ue WA 960062:1 E:E-aE-6 6 120E E26 A6:, 12D6.636-3•!t 206I ti263673Inn. -6-A661 rTransamerica Title Insurance Co . C O 0 RENTON WEDGWOOD WEST SEATTLE33427PacificHighwaySouth222 % .a—.A., S 67DE3Y-A.r ,.E 445:Cahf A.e 5 W Federal Wa WA 98003 9E,.. Sear a 9E"5 Sea't.e NA 96.16y , 12.E,E26.ef:5 (20E 626.6E2: 120E.626-a615 j Your Order No. Our Order No. 694845 Caraccioli - Monnahan/Bailey PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Washington Land Title Association Form Amount Premium Sales Tax Total X ) Owner's standard coverage 63 , 000 . 00 273 . 00 14 . 74 $287 . 74 Purchaser's standard coverage Mortgagee's standard coverage Mortgagee's ALTA coverage Tax Registration Date: July 31 , 1981 at 8 : 00 A.M. Total 287 . 74 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording ofanyappropriatedocuments, its policy or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on this pre-liminary commitment that title to the property described herein is vested on the date shown above in JULIUS CARACCIOLI , as his separate estate ; subject only to the exceptions shown herein and the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policyform. This report and commitment shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the coverage specifiedherein. By Description: That portion of Lots 8 , 9 , 10 , 49 , 50 and 51 in vacated Block 19ofC. D. Hillman ' s Earlington Gardens Addition to the City ofSeattle , Division No. 1 , as per plat recorded in Volume 17 ofPlats , on page 74 , records of King County , lying West of the EastValleyFrontageRoad , as conveyed to the State of Washington bydeedrecordedunderRecordingNo. 5442597 ; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated Harriman Avenue adjoining ,which , upon vacation , attached to said property by operation of law; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. continued - NOTE: 1. Investigation should ba mad, to determine if there are and sers-ice, installation, maintenance, or construction cba grs for seu er,water or electricity CZ 2. 1n the es-ent this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rtn1 E R''k.0 rendered in accord.rrtit uith our rate schedule. SRO 4101110 Page 2 Order No. 694845 EXCEPTIONS : A. 1% Excise tax, if unpaid . B. General taxes , as follows , together with interest after delinquency : Tax Account No . Amount Billed Amount Paid334040-3340-08 1981 T.45 . 09 145 . 09 Special taxes , as follows , together with interest after delinquency : Tax Account No . Year Amount Billed Amount Paid334040-3340-08 1981 3 . 65 3 . 65 C. PRELIMINARY ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT : Estimated Amount : 21 , 006 . 51 L. I . D. No :314 Levied by :City of RentonLienAttaches : August 2 , 1979For : Street and water Filed :July 2 , 1979 1 . Right granted to the Seattle Electric Company by C. D. Hillman andBessieOliveHillman , his wife , by instrument dated June 30 , 1909 ,recorded in Volume 577 of Deeds , on page 218 , to divert , appropriate ,or remove the water running in the ditch or ditches located upontheplatofsaidAddition. 2. Relinc;u:ishment of access to State Highway No .ight , viewandairbyDeedtoStateofWashingtonrecorded ,June 20 , and of 11962 , underRecordingNo . 5442597 . 3. If the property herein described is used as the place of residenceofthevesteeherein , the forthcoming document (s) must be executedbythevestee , together with the spouse , if any. NOTE 1 : Accordir,.g to the application, title is to vest in Robert F. MonnahanandPaulG. Bailey , each presumptively subject to the communityinterestofhisspouse , if married. We find no pertinent matters ofrecordagainstthenamesofsaidparties ; however, the Company hasbeenunabletosearchforanddoesnotinsureagainstmatters , if any, relating to the spouses , if any , which encumber title to saidproperty. SPB ;cz rm " %%-Ah-'S, 1 0111) alb Prr7{ i.Form Nn Hi!SP Drawn by CLecked Date Plat VoL ri PG. --li-{ Order No. 9 4 c'Lt `' SKETCH OF PROPERTY SE OUT IN ATTACHED ORDER To assist in locating the premises. It t not based on a survey, and the companyassumesnoIiabilityforvariationsifany, in dimensions and location. Lii irk 111.%. N AD_...la k, kilt .1 .111,111 11 • 11120:1WIW . . '3* m i I s.w tS TM. ST. 1 lip aaaaaa.m • aaaar17 I-WEE 1, 1 1 Ill Eliffinial i I 4- "si i, ME 7 4 i• 11111 1211111111=1.1ri"",. ' nil • I I t - • . , 2 . : .. ,., ; IME Tiiimpains! 40fr 111111-+ :MEMEigx apt V i:: MOW e.••'`a oil, A,, I IES mis. T: 4.!;' lam 3:JE11#g ..14J f v1t l_ iiI:Eiiiiur 12 EMR111 -t- I 1 mrigi w gar, z as 1 t 1 1 f A 1 a, I; . i •• 1 TlintI :. f#I 113111111•111101 z a' ; 1, Napfflict.-i- :" M , triv" . I• tH. . .. ... .. ' w —4 i NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR REZI1F FROM ' G' To I -1 ; TO 2F Fig F STORAGE_1ISAGF. FCF W74-81 ) GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED WEST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD APPROXIMATELY 320 FEET SOUTH OF S. W. 16TH STREET POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON VIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMM4TTEE [ E.R.C.S DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ArTION, : OES MODES NOT, HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRON- MENT. M AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, . MEM DVVIL.L NOT BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., AUGUST 31, 1981 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO !' JDT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : STEWART, VINCENT AND LOIS (ECF-072-81 , R-067-81 ) Application for rezone from G to B-1 to bring into con- formance with Comprehensive Plan; property located on west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. approximately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. p '' ittgaek a" i f^ ' SA-068-81 ) Application for site approval for construction of claims office in M-P zone; property located in Koll Business Center, northeast corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. The ERC has further considered and issued a proposed declaration of significance for the following project : CARRACCIOLI, JULIUS AND STELLA (ECF.0 74-81 R-069-81 ) Application for rezone from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse and material storage use; property located west side of E. Valley Road approximately 320' south of S.W 16th St. Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by August 31 , 1981 . Published: August 17, 1981 PROPOSED DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-069-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-074-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse, and material storage use. Proponent: Carraccioli, Julius and Stella Location of Proposal: West side of East VAlley Road approximately 320' south of S.W. 16th Street. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on August 12, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: David Clemens Roger Blaylock Ronald Nelson Richard Houghton James Matthew Steve Munson Gary Norris Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-074-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: August 10, 1981 2) Applications: R-069-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Fire Department, Police Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS may be required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for proposed declaration of environmental significance: 1 . The subject site is located in the floodway fringe as identified on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map from H.U.D. 2. Rezoning the site would suggest that the City approved the subsequent development of the site; however, that development will require filling which modifies the floodway fringe. Measures, if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a declaration of non-significance. 1 . Construction of the East Side Watershed Project. 2. Presentation of a computer model showing that the ultimate development of the site will not modify the flood fringe and adversely affect other property. CARRACCIOLI August 14 , 1981 PAGE 2 Signatures : 101/2/41/61)4-'////42;t44 Ron d G. Nelson D id R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director 7fliland ."`Hough on, ing Public Works Directo DATE OF PUBLICATION: August 17, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: August 31 , 1981 Date circulated :Comments due : 0//$3, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - On -. 8/ APPLICATION No (s ) . R•O69•11' PROPONENT : Ca2reLcce li., Tioljus FS/lei/4 PROJECT TITLE : REZO/vE Brief Description of Project : Apresedpfre=ow+cjsPi'1Re. demr•.+ f16.1% rr . C! aw t/PA Q r i s "1 ffra re•a/.5f4>rcl e uses LOCATION : Wert.fehree gm, t IX. 3aoSdfsw/iiewr SITE AREA : # 3 a/s20 0 BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : k 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : K 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20,) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : BSc mf Ge s s A,1 'AieY Recommendation : SI '\ DOS More Information_ Reviewed by :llA. G'C Title : (! 11 (1 J/( Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : tai Comment.. Jue : 40////2/ EMIVIR0NHEMITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - Qiy - 8/ APPLICATION No (s ) . R'4,69411 PROPONENT : Cdardkc ids•.Tdlit1S IFS61/0- PROJECT TITLE : REzO#/E Brief Description of Project : Aresegofre,aoseselfeer...1116-% L'/ + r ' vTvrt o ik . tthariAeus. r'r,'•e'Ar cle uses LOCATION : VVe51$1I. d eOt/te h. six. Sao'S. efa4/6Aj.r SITE AREA : 3 oZ S BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : "— IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 )1 Aniflal life : 6) Noile : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17 ) Human health: 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recr}eation : 20) Archeology/history : y COMMENTS : *** should participate in umprovements to E. Valley Rd. if building is built with security devices & security lighting that will minimize need for police services. Recommendation : DNSI xxxx DOS More Information Reviewed by : D. . Persson Title : Date : 8/4/81 FORM: ERC-0G Date circulated : V OP Comment_ _ue : eV/WO EMIOROhHEIWTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - OVf - RI APPLICATION No (s ) . R•069• PROPONENT : CantdLLGlif e•tTrd!hiS PS7ieAL i PROJECT TITLE : REzO 'E Brief Description of Project : Afftesepeapierselteervirvili6-i L-/ ilr 'MUMe °fleece, c(Jdr.AoU:C. grilkodoreditArAfe uses LOCATION : Ve f set, de E.U.ffer<dCd ow fox. 3ao'S. ofstL// Asst. SITE AREA : ± 3e2?,S2O5 BUILDING AREA (gross) ".' DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : "— IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : v/ 5 )' Animal life : I 6) Noise : v7 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : V/ 10 ) Ris of upset : V/: 11 ) PopLlation/Employment :_ v 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Tri ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts :__ 14 ) Public services : I / 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : A 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : v 20 ) Archeology/history : v/ COMMENTSj: Recommendation : N DOS More Information_ a o/2Revieve by : 1 itle : i'/c N Date : FORM: ERC1-06 d Date circulated : LT V/81 Comment, ..:e : dVl/00/0tY EXVIROXHENTAL CHECKLIST [ EVIEU SHEET E C F -Si APPLICATION No (s ) . 4•1069•8/ PROPONENT : Car4LCC elks Tunis . I Te•l/4 PROJECT TITLE : RezoNE Brief Description of Project : Af&ese 4freizeive dS•.,.+ 11651 LrI 4r 'Pawt DNur. WitrsAous.. Ad ra41Art to uses LOCATION : Wet $ I.e.Ust r/0 OX. 3ao'51 ofs4l// AJje SITE AREA : # 3 e/0520 0 BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : kir 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 )' Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : . 1 8 ) Lan Use ; north : LIK1e ,eIgp. ( east :sI south : 11 west : st Land use conflicts : View obstruction : so r 00 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 1/ 11 ) Population/Employment : 1/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : s ores fweed( S3LgJ/r elf, 'wtrafficimpacts : 14 ) Public services :_ 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 1:7/5/19 ) Recreation : 20.) Archeology/history : 16Or COMMENTS : 7 1r w 1 141 vv4/S t W CI due SOY°,I f`'r tst..aelf te . f A.L, re• Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : c5ilive /' tb1ts'Oh 1 itle : tS ( P/dn.te .-. Da t e : OfrO/SY FORM: ERC-0: Date circulated : v y 8 Comment] Jue : COAY EXVIRO\HEMITAL CHECIKLIST REVIEIW SHEET E C F - D7 - nV APPLICATION No (s ) . RL4004/ PROPONENT : Ca.t-R,_eC atit T&+ Sile./ IL PROJECT TITLE : REzO/*'E Brief Description of Project : ArectiSrfreaduricji.elre denrrriti % 4 '1 6 f?vh ,e _o eke t' weerlAous& r'Atjeredeteirtutfe. uses LOCATION : WeslslI. d F.U.,f(e /i dW/IX. Sao' : OfSSY//gA tr SITE AREA : t 3 ,2 szo BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO I ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 )1 Animal life : v/ 1 6) Noise : yv/ 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities: A (S4`^--- 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNS' DOS More lnformation__ Reviewed by : litle : Date : FORM: ERC-)6 Date circulated : le yik Comment ,,ue : G/b/00 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - Q'Y - 8/ APPLICATION No (s ) . /974,04 PROPONENT : C_dLrst._cGjds f JfIiuc ',J/Cl/Q PROJECT TITLE : REZONE Brief Description of Project : AreseXAfre2poir .feire61110014I/6"a 1 4 Au,e e a r a .iarsAouse. r/itaeredetArAfe uses LOCATION : VVe$1C$,I. dOJeJidL/,feR. 3420°S. 00s4//iA17r SITE AREA : # 30,S2O BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : "— IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topdgraphic changes : v' 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 )1 Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9). Natural resources : 10) Risk of upset : 11 ) Popwlation/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : S! X 5v traffic impacts : Ti: /, 7L /oi,_ iS 1N7/16r hE-ceder does 6,71i) r JlV, 4"4y97-695p, 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Enegy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Receation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : [ 4G- %2' 1 itle : 7v a/f% iyee i Date : 1 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 0/ Comment lue : COAV EXV IR0XHU TAL CHECIKLIST UEVIEU SHEET ECF - On -- 8/ APPLICATIOIN No (s ) . R'4,494l PROPONENT : C42.rd_CG1efrk . TVIinJS ....See J4 PROJECT TITLE : RE WE Brief Description of Project : APPreseXofreagratejselfe. Arw+ipifw ~!7 I:I +Ovfo re D Mee e w¢reAousG._ e,Ikeder.'i(Aotle uses LOCATION : 'Neff Sae de C.(1 a her) fine. 3aao.SI daW4AI SITE AREA : # 3 a,s20P r her) BUILDING AREA (gross) DLVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : "'' IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO_ 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : I 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 )1 Animal life : 6) Noi e : 7 Liit lare :9 9 r. 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south: west : Land use conflicts : Vie obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Num er of Dwellings : 13 ) Tri ends ( ITE ) : tra fic impacts :_ 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health :d/ 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : V 20.) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : Nr V DOS More Information__ Revieved by : Title : LEAD N6 . cS CI4.1/ST Date : 0 -- 7 -- W FORM: ERC-0G ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AUGUST 12 , 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS : RaMAC, INCORPORATED : (ECR-061-81) STIRSKEY HOLDINGS, LTD . : (ECF-075-81 - B-258) LYLE PICKLE : (ECF-069-81) NEW BUSINESS : STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPT. OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE Proposal for one-story office building (13,416 square feet) and parking for 77 cars to be utilized by Employment Security Department; property located at N.E. 10th Street and Index Avenue N.E. ECF-071-81 SUPERSTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LTD. SA-066-81 Application for site approval for a 30-unit housing project for the Renton Housing Authority; property located in the vicinity of 2821 N.E. 4th Street ECF-072-81 STEWART, VINCENT AND LOIS R-067-81 Application for rezone from G to B-1 to bring into conformance with Comprehensive Plan; property located on west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. approxi- mately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. ECF-073-81 FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP SA-068-81 Application for site approval for construction of claims office in M-P zone; property located in Koll Business Center, northeast corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. ECF-074-81 CARACCIOLI, JULIUS AND STELLA R-069-81 Application for rezone from G to L-i for future office, warehouse, and material storage uses; property located on the west side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street In II 11v was ' m'I 1 I 1 rili 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AUGUST 12, 1981 im.4 f Ar.. \L: erm. 1 i 4 1111, 1-‘-':-. c..._----,, s_._ ________-1 tel 1 \ W .11 i 11,- LAKEscrc STEWART1\WASHINGTON lii' --; 1 pirValltilarida t romo4.=. .4,1, 1....is. - - k 16.,:it i S A '14-16 MENT i 3iiiiiiiiffiA ' Mati . 1 ;f. gm 1 m i I_ III^r U^ SUPERSTRUCTURE aittem ripir,---gig t'1Ii" t\e- Il-- IA. i. l...I11014il i N._ 1..___1__,-.lV.1_ 1k 1_.1-:--'* simb- i j0.iSi. u.iIM1.I. 1 i, il- Ii- li1 l. A 11 v_..--.. lv.- i,.. A 11 -i— 1V 4 I11mI1/ a6 ft1llo g..... ra'_ i'- t..-.. 07.-'•. Z..• 7.'.• U- t- 1.4..- 114I 111 7ty• rAiii 1, - fir.,/ r-( t, »oh. ) CARA t'e 1 r1 1, e miquk11 Nil FARMERS IL illi WWI Er. 4 ctti II LAKEILsMIL I .. YOUNGS IL ILIfff. 1 AM J r CITY OFT } D RETIE Old FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SAND USE, EARL APPLICATION NO. i 2b9-I/ E MINS1 'S AW N APPLICATION FEE $ /$'Or APP RTT RECEIPT NO. / Z,?. 7 t-bD J CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name Julius and Stella Caracciol i Phone 872-8370 Address 21822 84th Ave. S. , Kent Wa. 98031 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on92nd Ave. South (East Valley Frontage Road) between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. 19th Street 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 32 ,520 square feet 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Located in the SW 1/4 of Section 19-23-5 portions of lots 8_ 9_ 10 and all of 49, 50 and 51 of Hillman ' s Earlington Gardens #1 Volume 17, page 74 of plats in King County, Washington together with that portion of vacated Harriman Avenue 91st Avenue South) 6 . Existing Zoning G Zoning Requested L-I NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Office, warehouse and material storage 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. The site will be filled and landscaped as required. All storage will be surrounded by a sight-obscuring fence. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Between nine months and 3 years 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 O RENTO AFFIDAVIT 4/\ 311ga1 ... z I , JULIUS CARACCIOLI being duly sworn, atiatIta 1that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 31st day of July 19 81 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Kirkland eUvuetk- Name ofary Public) S nature of Owner) 33838 Pacific Highway South Federal Ways,Washington - 21822 84th Avenue South Address) Address) Kent Washington 98031 City) State) 872-8370 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By : Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM OF RF4 , Jul 31 1981 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. b d Qti-' •----•4,/ N/NG D?01V 1EnvironmentalChecklistNo. O /—t/ PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Julius and Stella Caraccioli 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 21822 84th Avenue South Kent, Washington 98031 Phone # 872-8370 3. Date Checklist submitted July 31 , 1981 4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Rezone of .75 acres situated in South Renton to Light Industrial from present G zoning 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Vacant land situated between S.W. 16th and S.W. 19th St. on 92nd Avenue South. The property is surrounded by large parcels which are currently zoned L-I , vacant and being filled. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : October 1981 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain: Eventually the property will be developed 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: LID pending for 92nd Avenue South by City 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features?X YES MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Property will be filled to buildable elevations 17' -18' 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X VET— MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X SYE MAYBE NO Explanation: After rezoning the property will be filled to a buildahle elevation 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , X microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YET— MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 4- 5) Fauna. - ill the proposal result in : a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBE WU— Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: From vacant land to light industrial ucagp 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YE5 MAYBE W Explanation: 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NN f) Solid waste and disposal?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Property development is tied to the forthcoming LID for the area 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES RATTE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical X site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 40.041..61erere."-4.9-'e-X-10" s ' ned Julius Caraccioli name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Eventual development will increase the traffic in the area by 10 to 20 trips per day 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection?X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYbE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES FTTITY NO Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. Commercial Brokerage Company July 31 , 1981 TO: City of Renton Planning Department REZONE JUSTIFICATION 1) Comprehensive plan indicates M-P zoning. However do to the small size of the property the owner is requesting L-I with appropriate restrictive covenants if required. 2) Property surrounding subject is zoned as follows : North - L-I South - H-I West - H-I East - 92nd Ave S. "G" zoning east of roadway 3) There are very few sites available of one-acre or less for light industrial users. 4) Utilization of this property through the rezone will increase the tax base, offer more employment and improve the area's appearance and economic activity. 5) A number of other rezones of a similar nature have been approved in the general area : Ordinance # 3482 dated November 12, 1980 Ordinance # 3270 dated December 1978 Ordinance # 3053 dated August 1979 Pre-Cut International - R344-79 Thank you , Larry M. Brown WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. For J. Caroccioli 33838 Pacific Highway South • Federal Way, Washington 98003 • (206) 838-6070 • 624-1250 NArLZIIzC `t, SY ` IT ' 9Z1JccD tie 14D i15T z) 0--- - 9T • i•-r—_,..., ., 19. . ... f N- , z _ PI 1L£f zLS ` I as `.tI IiI6TA N. a121 I I an0b - 1, fI617 I i.:C'N Ib . j,. 8Ijt17 . N. il_1 Ltzv ‘•\ 1 o tQ92 ) Sl 2b , 1 3t1,9-4 S-1I N nQ` 8 q8fi A 114,' p wN, D 1- aIOS • 6CS 1 / I11111,. 4 01Sq r,'11ySr.9i' ' j 4/ 4 S lissIy { yI i SSSSc ' Y 1 1 9545 LS - ZJLS '1- tt ^b4 01V25a)\ S- 061VO'061 n" So'061S0'061 nlroitIrr., ->: LILHIL91 o•oj Sc)'s6E' 096"06r \ i. 560OWCOblrd©15- r` f`4414rt-M_0tjo 4°• ' liilN6S10in 1 ± -112- 001i ‘.6) s'O • -1 \ -1Vili_ _JVciozgu, 4----- .. .-- 4... ... iA. cl-- - -5-b.us1- - -T- - 57ff•C715-r i jQ.E17MIIST121%18(13OY10 cid....- NII.a.1. 5 11 rt.7.T.'ZVW3nr1 ,T.11+IS'_ a!IY ,KLH: Receipt # CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME DATE PROJECT & LOCATION e- d /04.4 r ti_n` ' r`/ App'ication Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank vou. ENDING ' OF FILE v FILE TITLE fi - 06g - Sr N -U N., 1. f' 1 J l I 4i O I I Y / y( J Aln y c 0 r)( Jf•/ r a I r- " - '' l') ; 1 e / 4,-, C...., it- A 1. 4r 1 1 1 a NI Avg- , c- . V1 7---- I ` r \( A1. Le. N7 A R oi, U H