Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA81-081BEGINNINU OF FILE FILE TITLE WOol MI icrOF«Meu r CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3627 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT B-1) (R-005-82 - CARNER) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith , the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department on or about February 3 , 1982 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about March 23, 1982 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan , as amended, and the City Council having, duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOV, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON , DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow specified ; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated March 26 , 1982 ; the Building Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning , to-wit : F . See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E . 4th Street) SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 3rd day of May , 1982 . D* Lit res A. Mead, Ci Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 3rd day of May , 1982 . itOOAADO SLt.t dt. Barbara Y. hinpoc , Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J .Marren, City..A.rtornev Date of Publication : May 7, 1982 ORDINANCE NO. 3627 EXHIBIT "A" Rezone R-005-82 That portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W.M. ; in King County, Washington , described as follows : Beginning 150 feet West of the Southeast corner of the West-half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 10 , thence North 290 .4 feet ; thence West 80 feet; thence South 290 .4 feet ; thence East 80 feet to the point of beginning ; EXCEPT the South 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road purposes . r 'V'1*G'ail 41' Njj.? . .. 'I i 4i f .91"' 2U...J.J LC 0 0 t 6 . is 0. f_., 74,5::?:,Nr,,, V.. to-• _ S. N zit 1 . . • i • .t. . ....I--.. . z..),. G IGs-I1. 1 v , ii we.0.i.%"44' i t.' ' 1 i tIl• I '.- ;. . 1 . ' : :. ,' i ElFi - I t Is Jl• •• I t SR-1 IJ1 i R-2 J . GS -I R_3 R_ 6 6 R-3VIIIMIIMIMMER 561;5‘I, .... ,., I.:_. L-1 B- I JrjjJJ G E:ENJ l. 00,-- T i j • I f. .•`TLC, i I rci V Rr:oNC: CARNLi., .,i , f, i - 1 ..- .' .. APPLICANT_ _,..__^r:, t:.it;T0T.L AREA ±10,000 sq. ft PR I NC 1 PAL ACCESS Via N. E. -ith Street EXISTING ZONING U-1 EXISTING USE P1rot Covering Business PROPOSED USE xi• u:r-t ,•:t of Lxisting Fl000r Covering Business COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Comriptt ial COMMENTS. January 14, 1982 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE BEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION . APPELLANT: Gary and Tom Carner FILE NO. ECF-091-81 R-081-81 ) LOCATION: 4508 N.E. 4th Street SUMMARY OF APPEAL: The appellants have appealed a Final Declaration of Significance issued by the Environmental Review Committee for a proposed rezone from the G zoning district to a B-1 classification on the subject site. SUMMARY OF DECISION: The decision of the Environmental Review Committee is affirmed. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the letter of appeal , examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 12, 1982 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner explained the public hearing process for appeals of environmental determinations made by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) , noting that the issue is not whether a rezone should or should not be granted but rather whether the city has carried out its responsibility under the State Environmental Policy Act in determining whether the proposal will have more than a moderate effect on the environment, and if so, whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared for the project. Testimony by the appellant was then requested. Responding was: Gary L. Carner 3405 Talbot Road S. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Carner objected to the requirement imposed on the applicant by the Environmental Review Committee to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the requested rezone since the proposal would be limited to a 576 square foot addition to an existing building, such addition to be smaller in size than an average two-car garage. There would be no impact to sewers or storm drainage utilities in the area due to minimal change in the character of the property and no additional plumbing is proposed in the expansion area. Citing the ERC's concern regarding increased generation of traffic onto N.E. 4th Street, Mr. Carner noted that due to the nature of the business, a maximum of four or five customers utilize the facility on a busy day causing insignificant impact on existing traffic generation rates. In reviewing the matter with the ERC, Mr. Carner had inquired if impact from only the proposed addition would require an EIS, and he was told that the proposal in itself would not require such review; however, an EIS was being required by the city for all newly annexed property located east of Union Avenue N.E. He concluded by stating that the subject property is less than one-half an acre in size, the proposal would cause no significant impact upon the environment, and preparation of an EIS would cost between four and twenty thousand dollars which would render the proposal impractical to pursue. The Examiner invited testimony in support of the appellant 's position. There was no response. He then requested testimony by a member of the Environmental Review Committee, David R. Clemens, Policy Development Director. Mr. Clemens reviewed the city's responsibility under state enabling legislation and city ordinances to review potential consequences of proposed action, in this case, a rezone of one-half acre to the B-1 zoning district. Although that zone allows the current use proposed by the applicant, it also allows expanded uses of business and high density multiple family residential development, or a potential for between 15 and 20 dwelling units. Mr. Clemens stated the city's position that a density of that level would create potentially adverse impact upon the community and set a precedent for rezone and development of many more acres in the immediate vicinity. Although the requested proposal would not impact water courses downstream, development of the property to its fullest potential under the B-1 zone standards would have an adverse effect. Mr. Clemens also expressed the ERC's concern regarding congested traffic on N.E. 4th Street west of the subject site which would be exacerbated upon increased development of multiple family residential uses. The availability of public services was discussed, and it was noted that although the area ECF-091-81 Page Two is only lightly developed at the current time, the potential exists for impact upon the city's available services including police and fire; and sanitary sewers are unavailable east of Union Avenue to serve the subject site. To mitigate impacts from these factors, an Environmental Impact Statement should be required prior to rezone of the property. The Examiner entered the following exhibit into the record: Exhibit #1 : Appeal File containing letter of appeal and other pertinent documents The Examiner then requested Mr. Clemens to designate the subject site on the display map and aerial photographs. Mr. Clemens denoted the location of the site on N.E. 4th Street slightly west of Duvall Avenue N.E. Referencing the first concern of the ERC, storm drainage, he noted that the swale located south of N.E. 4th Street extends around the Heather Downs subdivision and out through the Maplewood Golf Course, and additional development of the basin will increase storm runoff into that area unless properly mitigated. Regarding traffic, the major N.E. 3rd/N.E. 4th Street corridor has a very high service demand level and the committee is concerned regarding any development which would cause further impact. Mr. Clemens referenced the Ullrich appeal a few months prior for which similar concerns were expressed, and advised that because of the uncertainty of the precise impacts of development, an impact statement should be prepared. Citing the most critical concern, unavailability of sanitary sewer lines, Mr. Clemens advised the most logical extension of sewers to serve the area would fall into two categories, to the existing system west of Union Avenue N.E. or to the new trunk facility located through the drainage canyon and connecting to the Metro line in the Maple Valley Highway. Although the area proposed for development by the appellant is minor, concerns of the committee relate to the consequences of development of the entire site. The Examiner inquired if the committee would modify its stand if the applicant signed restrictive covenants to limit development only to business/commercial use or reduced the rezone to only the area proposed for the addition. Mr. Clemens stated that modification would possibly alter the committee's decision; however, it must be reviewed and considered by the ERC membership. Mr. Carner clarified that the property had been purchased two years earlier for the purpose of construction of a floor covering store, and the current request is solely for the proposed addition, not development of the entire site. The addition, he noted, would provide storage and display space for the business. He indicated concern that the ERC had based its decision on the highest possible development of the property, and not upon the current request of the applicant; furthermore, all future development of the site would be subject to review during building permit application. Mr. Carner discussed the zoning on the property prior to annexation, R-900-high density multifamily residential , which was automatically changed to G-General upon annexation into the city. He concluded by stating his desire to obtain a permit to construct an addition to the existing building for storage and display purposes, which should not cause impact to sewers, drainage or traffic. The Examiner advised that two options exist for disposition of the matter, either he could review the appeal as submitted including development potential for the entire site, or withdrawal of the application and resubmission of a request for rezone of only the area proposed for the addition. If the latter option was desired, the appeal could then be dismissed by the Examiner. Mr. Carner opted to proceed with review of the appeal . The Examiner requested further testimony. Responding was: Mary Ellen Hamblin 13025 138th Avenue S.E. Renton, WA 98056 Ms. Hamblin, representing the Open Space Coalition of Southeast King County, advised that the organization is interested in preservation of the natural drainage ways that run north of the subject site in an east-west direction and are part of the Class I habitat in the vicinity of Honey Dew Elementary School on Union Avenue N.E. She supported the city's concern regarding environmental impact which she felt was appropriate prior to any rezone to B-1 in the area. Mr. Carner requested clarification of the area encompassed by the rezone review. Mr. Clemens clarified that the subject application pertains only to the one-half acre of property owned by the Carners. The Examiner further explained that precedent setting influence for future rezones is also a concern of the city. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing was closed at 9:28 a.m. ECF-091-81 Page Three FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: FINDINGS: 1 . The appellants, Gary and Tom Carner, filed an application to reclassify approximately one-half acre of property from G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) to B-1 (Business/Commercial ) . The application was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) which issued a final Declaration of Significance (DS) . The appellants then appealed that declaration pursuant to Section. 4-3011 (B) . The appeal was heard on January 12, 1982. 2. The subject property is located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street. The site is located on the north side of N.E. 4th Street between Union Avenue N.E. and Duvall Avenue N.E. 3. A commercial building is located on the subject site near N.E. 4th Street. The applicant has proposed an addition of about 576 square feet, 24 feet by 24 feet, to serve as storage for the existing building. Commercial uses are not permitted in the G zone, and therefore the applicant requested the reclassification. 4. The reclassification of the subject site from G to B-1 would enable the subject property to be developed with high density multifamily housing as well as the commercial expansion the applicant has proposed. The half acre would permit the establishment of up to approximately 30 dwelling units if developed to full R-4 densities. 5. The population density with its resultant demands on public services and traffic impacts of such development were used as the basis for the Declaration of Significance by the ERC. 6. There are no public sewer lines or storm drainage systems east of Union Avenue N.E. The city is in the process of analyzing the needs and locational requirements for such systems in the area. 7. A drainage way runs in the vicinity and wends its way eventually to the Maple Valley Golf Course. Additional storm water would find its way into this system changing the flow and velocity in the drainage feature; the impacts of such storm water are unknown. 8. The city indicated that there is a significant amount of undeveloped acreage in the vicinity of the subject site and the precedent of the proposed rezone and lack of both sanitary and storm sewer systems and the impacts of traffic on the heavily traveled N.E. 4th Street corridor would have a significant impact on the environment. 9. The appellant indicated that the only plans were for the commercial expansion, and the potential development of the site was a future possibility which should not be considered at this time. 10. The surrounding area is sparsely developed and designated for commercial development. The area is classified G as is the subject property. 11 . The area was annexed into the city from King County where the zoning was R-900 which permitted high density development. Upon annexation, a property is automatically reclassified as G. While no specific hearing is held on the reclassification, a public hearing is held for the annexation, and parties agreeing to annexation are aware of the effects of annexation. Annexation to the city itself is probably more than sufficient change of circumstances to permit a reclassification of the properties annexed. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The decision of the governmental agency acting as the responsible official is entitled to "substantial weight" (RCW 43.21C.090) . Therefore, the determination of the Environmental Review Committee, the city's responsible official , is entitled to substantial weight, and the appellant has the burden of demonstrating that the determination was in error. The burden is further defined as whether the decision was arbitrary and capricious in light of the record. (Short v. Clallam County, 22 Wn.App.825, 829, 1979) . A decision is "arbitrary and capricious" if there is no support for it in the record and it is therefore a willful and unreasoning action, in disregard of facts and circumstances. (Stempel v. Dep' t of Water Resources, 82 Wn.2d 109, 114, 1973) 2. The policies of SEPA are more clearly safeguarded when agency action results in ECF-091-81 Page Four full disclosure of the impacts of a proposal upon the environment. (Norway Hill v. King County Council , 87 Wn.2d 267, 1976) The issuance of a Declaration of Significance by the ERC requires the completion of an environmental impact statement which does result in full disclosure. 3. There was no contention that the subject proposal was not a major action capable of significantly affecting the quality of the environment; therefore, the ERC had to determine whether the proposal would or would not have a significant adverse effect on the quality of the environment. A major action is determined to have a significant adverse effect on the quality of the environment if more than a moderate effect on the quality of the environment is a reasonable probability (Norway, at 278) . "The nature of the existing environment is an important factor. The same project may have a significant adverse impact in one location, but not in another location." (WAC 197-10-360(2) ) "It should also be remembered that proposals designed to improve the environment may also have adverse environmental impacts. The question at the threshold determination is not whether the beneficial aspects of a proposal outweigh its adverse impacts, but rather, if the proposal involves any significant adverse impacts upon the quality of the environment. If it does,. an EIS is required." (WAC 197-10-360(3)) 4. Subject to court decisions and to the criteria enumerated by the Washington Courts in analyzing the environmental threshold determinations, the decision of the ERC must be affirmed and an EIS is required. There are too many unanswered questions about the impacts of the proposal . The proposal is a major action, and the location of the subject property in an area without sewer service and along the N.E. 4th Street corridor is such to bring the proposal into the category of those which have an adverse impact on the quality of the environment. 5. The proposal is not as the appellant argues, a 576 square foot expansion, but a rezone of one-half acre of property to a B-1 classification. B-1 could permit high density multifamily development. The impacts of such development on the unsewered area, which also lacks storm drainage and is located along the N.E. 4th Street corridor, would have "more than a moderate effect on the quality of the environment" and an EIS is required. 6. WAC 197-10-060 makes it clear that the "total proposal including its direct and indirect impacts" should be reviewed when making an environmental determination. The total proposal is the proposed action, together with all proposed activity functionally related to it. Future activities are functionally related to the present proposal if. . . (b) The present proposal facilitates or is a necessary prerequisite to future activities." (WAC 197-10-060(2) (b)) The impacts of a proposal include its direct impacts as well as its reasonably anticipated indirect impacts. Indirect impacts are those which result from any activity which is induced by a proposal . These include, but are not limited to, impacts resulting from growth induced by the proposal , or the likelihood that the present action will serve as a precedent for future actions. (For example, adoption of a zoning ordinance will encourage or tend to cause particular types of projects. )" (WAC 197-10-060(3)) (Emphasis supplied) 7. In the present case, the applicant proposed only a rezone, but the classification would permit multiple family development and has the potential of generating similar requests in the area. Other areas surrounding the subject site, besides being sparsely developed, are also zoned G, and the reclassification of the subject site could induce similar requests in the immediate area. The entire proposal would therefore include such potential secondary or indirect impacts. 8. The ERC's determination that a full EIS is required is reasonable in light of the record. Requiring an EIS is more consistent with the policies of SEPA. The provision of an EIS will enable the decision maker to fully evaluate the project. The policy enunciated in "Norway Hill " was that public agencies should foster the environmental full disclosure goals of SEPA. "An affirmative threshold determination should be overturned only if found to be arbitrary and capricious or contrary to law." Short at 830) Whether or not a proposal should or should not be approved should be based on firm environmental evidence before the decision is made. (Norway at 279) The decision of the ERC should be affirmed. The action of the ERC is not willful and unreasoning action, in disregard of the facts and circumstances. Only the preparation of an EIS would allow a reasoned ELr-u91-81 Page Five decision to be made on whether or not the proposal should be permitted and under what circumstances. Therefore, the decision of the ERC is affirmed. 9. The applicant is free to reapply for a more limited rezone to permit the proposed expansion, but such proposal would be subject to similar scrutiny, and the ERC is free to reach the same or similar conclusions even for a limited rezone. DECISION: The decision of the ERC is affirmed. ORDERED THIS 14th day of January, 1982. Fred J. Ka an Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of January, 1982 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Gary L. Carner, 3405 Talbot Road S. , Renton, WA 98055 Mary Ellen Hamblin, 13025 138th Avenue S.E. , Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 14th day of January, 1982 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Dave Clemens , Policy Development Director Members, Planning Commission Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before January 28, 1982. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner' s decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal is governed by Title IV, Section 3011 , which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 20 days from the date of the Examiner's decision. OF R 46 z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,0 co. FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-25930, 9gTFD SEP E OP CITY OF RENTON RMUMMFebruary22, 1982 FEB 2 3 1982 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.Gary L. Carner 3405 Talbot Road S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. ECF-091 -31 (R-081 -81 ) ; Gary and Tom Carner; Appeal of Environmental Determination. Dear Mr. Carner: The appeal period for the Examiner's Report , dated January 14, 1982, has now expired. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the Building & Zoning Department this date for permanent filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, 11.4"."tc) Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Building & Zoning Department li- OF-/ ---Fl Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Ginny.. iab.ago being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that sh eis the chief clerk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a NOTICE OF week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been PUBLIC HEARING for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,RENTON LAND USE printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper HEARING EXAMINER published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is RENTON, WA now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the A Public Hearing will beaforesaidplaceofpublicationofsaidnewspaper.That the Daily Record held by the Renton LandChroniclehasbeenapprovedasalegalnewspaperbyorderoftheSuperior Use Hearing Examiner at hisCourtoftheCountyinwhichitispublished, to-wit,King County, regular meeting in the Coun- cil Chambers, City Hall, Re- nton, Washington, onWashington.That the annexed is a.Not.i ow-of-Public iieering January 12, 1982, at 9:00 a.m. to consider the follow- R6895 ing petitions: 1. CARNER, GARY AND TOM APPEAL: as it was published in regular issues(and An appeal by Gary L. not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period Carner of a Final Declaration of Significance issued by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) for pro- of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the perty proposed for rezone by Gary and Tom Carner from 1 8t January 82 G"to B-1,files ECF-091-81 day of 19 and ending the and R-081-81,located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street. 2. SCHUMACHER, day of 19 ,both dates ROBERT APPEAL inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- An appeal by Robert scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee Schumacher of a Final De- claration of Significance is-21665 sued by the Environmentalchargedfortheforegoingpublicationisthesumof $ which Review Committee (ERC)has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the for property proposed forfirstinsertionandperfolioofonehundredwordsforeachsubsequent rezone b y R o b e r tinsertion. Schumacher from R-2 to R- 3, files ECF-107-81 and R- t d!!G 086 81,located in thevicini- U U ty of 223 Garden Avenue J North. chief clerk Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Subscribed and sworn to before me this 4th day of Zoning Department. All interested persons to January 82 said petitions are invited to 19 be present at the Public Hearing on January12,e 1981, at 9:00 a.m. to ex-Al?We?" ex- press their opinions. Notary Public in and r the State of Washington, Ronald G. Nelson re tding at K it, King County. Building Official j,FAclarel Way Published in the Daily Re- cord Chronicle January 1, Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 1982. R6895 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JANUARY 6, 1982 AGENDA COMMENTING AT 10:00 A.M. THIRD 1'LOOR CONFERENCE ROOM APPEAL!.: ECF-09]-81 GARNER, GARY L. AND TOM R-081-El Appeal of final declaration of significance : application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street ECF-107-81 SCHUMACHER, ROBERT R-086-8L Appeal of final declaration of significance: application for rezone from R-2 to R-3 to allow for future construction of a 9-unit apartment building; property located in the vicinity of 223 Garden Ave. South OLD BUSINESS: ECF-013-81 HOMECRAFT LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. (THE TERRACE)SA-010-81 Response from Hearing Examiner regarding ERC request for reconsideration of his decision regarding application for site approval to allow construction of 280 dwelling unit multiple family complex; property located between N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street and west of Edmonds Ave. N.E. ECt'-101-81 KOERING, HOLVICK deREGT (WASHINGTON TECHNICALSA-094-81 CENTER) Application for site approval to locate four one-story buildings (12-15) to be used as a business park or for light warehousing; property located at the southwest corner of S.W. 7th St. and Powell Ave. S.W. ECF-102-81 KOERING, HOLVICK deREGT (WASHINGTON TECHNICALSA-095-81 CENTER) Application for site approval to locate five one-story buildings (1-5) to be used as a busi- next park or for light warehousing; property located at the northwest corner of Powell Ave. S.W. and S.W. 7th Street King County LIBERTY VIEW 265-81-R & 1081-24 Proposed reclassification and plat (King County) Rezone from SR (7200) , SR (9600) , SR (15,000) to RS 7200 and RS 9600; 97 lot single-family subdi- vision with clustered lots & townhouses; property located between Talbot Road South and 102nd Ave. South (extended) south of approximately So. 168th St. (extended) . REVIEW OF TRAFFIC COUNTS AND STORM WATER INFORMATION ENVIROVMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Januar/ 6, 1982 Page Tao NEW BUSINESS: ECF-099-81 CITY OF RENTON SM-096-81 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Application for substantial development permit for construction or development of alterations to paving and parking located at Cedar River Trail adjacent to Riverside Drive near the mouth of the Cedar River ECF-1C0-81 UNGER, CHARLES R. SM-097-81 Application for substantial developm^nt permit for construction of mechanical boat lift which sets on lake bottom adjacent to 75' dock at single family residence; property located at 3717 Lake Washington Blvd. North ECF-1]4-81 WILGEO COMPANY B-268 Application for building permit to allow construc- tion of one-story shopping center, two buildings, VILLAGE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER; property located at Bronson Way North ip' ' S rbl I ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 111 WIJANUARY6, 1982 I 7 1A" a _ T Al . :. =--1( 1 sue `-----}, t LAKE III WASHINGTON UNGER -,._.+ •Or l 1 IPg 'b.iiitra I\ 41-I I 1 EP ' i L UPI- I pre,1 CITY-- \- • - 4111611 `1;!rt1I 1, \ 1 !dirm iVOW& VIII mEE .. - \\ L.-- -- 1 Ittb,, /At! reqr.111101131 11,: wi r 1_ iiiiii..c."" -iii jJ r GARNER 11 IL ,,,_SCHUMACHER HOMECRAFT H 14-1:11,1„.iiiiita,„....141,012,2 1,ME 1 -111 l Ma tv b'y r..:M11 `, .' __ '- IIIIIIU Mr I '1. r- - tom h1iiimrip05roleAlhIIIIIIIFN' 7 V Ifoolkilaill, i 111 t 1 ,i,.ç 7 i111 iii emirs A. Nr-r 1i_ LIBERTY VIEW U 1 rAil I i lir r+-1 i/ C EN 1„ e II LAKE L _ YOUNGSIII LLJ2 11 1; i FLOORS £ MORE COM L[Tt INTtRIOR RUMODtLINO CARPETS VINYL CouNTtR Tors CA/M/1Ts RENTON.W 12.114 1108255-6765RtNTON, WA, .paa RECEIVED December 6', 1981 Mr. F. Kaufln an dITY OF RENTON RECEIVED HEARING EXAMINER DE 1981 CITY OF RENTON Hearing Examiner FM HEARING EXAMINER City of Renton. DEFC 2 3 19817181911001020.213141516 MA Dear Mr. Kaufman: 718191108111121112131415,6 This letter is in regards to the Declaration of Environmental Similificance issued on November 23, 1981 as to the Rezone Application Nos R-081-81 and Environmental Checklist No: EfC-o91-81, We would kike to find out why the planning lepartme nt feels that and EIS is necessary. In the proposed declaration of significance dated November 9, 1981 the reason gor the proposed declaration was stated to be( concern for sewer and storm drain- age, ) We addressed this issue in our letter of November 12, 1981 upon whitch we received a letter from the rlanning Department dated November 19, 1981 and in this letter the reason for the EIS seams to have changed from the (sewer and storm drainage) to a variety of other things all hypothetical, What if•1a' and Maby1s. Mr. Kaufman we are trying to deal 'i a with a real situation not something that might happen down the road a few years, an you know and we know there is no answer to a hypothetical question, So let us please deal with the facts. As stated in our letter of November 12. 1981 we are not planning a large expantion to our store only about 600 s/f. and addressing the original reason for the proposed declaration We are adding na plumbing to the addition and our drainage is not a problem so as to the reason for a EIS we feel that it is in- significant:as to what we are doing, I spoke to Mr, Clemens of the Planning department and ask him if our planed addition was the reason for the proposed EIS and he told me no and he told me that everything East of Union Ave. that had been annex •in to the City of Renton would MORa THAN A /LOON STOW FLOORS d MORE COMPLETE INTERIOR R/MODIL.NO Amery* VINrL eouNTtq Toes CAMINETS 13606 S.E. 12STN S i7wl v7RENTON. WA. ••O•. s 7 fi!fi7 December 3, 1981 be required to have and EIS, If we had been told this and that the cost could be between $5,000 and 20,000 dollars from the begaining we would not have filed r6or the rezone because we could not afford to pay for the EIS. our plans do fit in with the future plans of the City for this area. The new reasons given by the planning department for the EIS in there letter of November 19, 1981 being what might be done with the property if rezoned to B-1 We feel that the City of Itentons Building department can and will control the development of this propertpl by the issueing of permits to us or to anyone that might have this property no matter what the zonsing is. We do want you to know that we at Floors and More are in full support of any progress as far as sewers and storm drainage for our area and will be happy to help in this all we can. We ag- in appeal the decision of the committee to require an EIS for the re-zoneing of this property at this time. Thank you. Very Truly Yours MOMS TIYN A MOOR ISTOOS“ BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS December 30, 1981 Renton Municipal Building 9:00 a.m. 4th Floor Conference Room ATTENDEES: Richard Houghton, Chairman Dave Clemens, Policy Development Director Jim Mathews, Fire Department Ron Nelson, Building Official Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Bob Hufnagle, Parks Department Patricia Porter, Secretary VISITORS: Gary E. Warner, Stephan $ Assoc. Gary Carner, 3405 Talbot Rd. Bill Snell, Haggard, Tousley $ Brain 1. CALL TO ORDER - The meeting was called to order by Chairman Houghton at 9:05 a.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Moved by NELSON, seconded by CLEMENS, that the minutes of the December 16, 1981 meeting be approved as read. MOTION CARRIED 3. CORRESPONDENCE: Chairman Houghton read letter from Renon School District relative off-site improvements along Monroe Ave./Renton Vocational-Technical Institute. He indicated that Mr. Belmondo had also come in and talked about engaging the services of Mike Yuhl to develop plans and specifications for said off-site improvements. He had been informed that he should complete the installation of improvements or submit a bond; therefore, he was asking for a deferral. Discussion ensued about assurance and it was decided that a letter should be written asking for a Letter of Credit in the amount of money the district has allocated for the project. 4. REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL: None 5. REFERRALS FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS a. Application for Sign Variance, 4508 N.E. 4th, Gary & Tom Carner/continued. Ron Nelson advised that this had been continued to give the applicant an opportunity to explain what was obstructing the sign that caused it to be brought out closer to the front of the property. Mr. Carner replied that nothing was obstructing the sign but rather that it was back so far that it was not visible. Further that the property line was 42' back from the center of the street. Ron Nelson explained that when they approved the plan it set the sign back too far. Dave Clemens asked Mr. Carner if other than inconvenience of the sign back so far was there any physical obstruction of the view. Mr. Carner advised that it was obstructed by trees and shrubs. He went on to say that as the old sign had been out farther and it caused no vehicular obstruction that they were requesting same for new sign and, further, that they want to set it on the property line. Recommendations were read from departments and discussion followed about the height of the sign and question was raised about future plans for widening of this street. Chairman Houghton stated that there would be no 4 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS 2- December 30, 1981 problem because they have 42' of R/W and 18 additional feet out of the paving, plus a problem with funding for any widening in the foreseeable future. Moved by NELSON, seconded by CLEMENS, that the deferral be granted per Building Depart- ments recommendations, i.e. , sign set back 1' back of property line and a height restriction of 10' . MOTION CARRIED b. Application for Home Business License, 107 Main Ave. S. #402, Cedar River Photographics. Discussion followed as to this not being a home business license technically under the City Ordinance. Moved by CLEMENS, seconded by NORRIS, that this be referred to appropriate City Departments for their action. MOTION CARRIED. c. Application for Home Business License, 1705 Pierce Ave. S.E. , Sewing Consultant. The application was read and determination made that there would be customers or clientele. Moved by NELSON, seconded by CLEMENS, that the application be denied on the basis of there being customers on the site which is not allowed as home business usage. MOTION CARRIED d. Deferral Off-Site Improvements, Homecraft Land Development Co. , Inc. , btwn. N.E. 3rd fT N.E. 4th Sts. , West of Edmonds Ave. N.E. Moved by NORRIS, seconded by MATHEWS to postpone this matter until the ERC requested review has been reconsid- ered. CLEMENS call for discussion and asked that Mr. Snell, who was present, be given time to explain why this item was before the Board. Mr. Snell advised he was with Hazzard Tousley f Brain who represented Homecraft. He went on to say that the motion made had no particular bearing upon their request as the Hearing Examiner in his statement said that any question of deferral of improve- ments to Edmonds should be referred to the Board. He stated that they have a short plat that needs to be filed and that they can not get the plat recorded unless they obtain a deferral or have the improvements installed. Also they need to have the short plat recorded the first part of the new year. Chairman Houghton clarified that this request really had nothing to do with Homecraft per se but that they were going back to the original short plat and in order to have it recorded they must have a deferment of improvements and post bond. Mr. Clemens explained that the problem would be the extent of the deferral and stated that the key question would be whether the Hearing Examiner would agree or disagree as to whether the intersection would have to be improved. He went on to address that fact that if the proponent was willing to bond for the full improvement of the intersection, a two piece bond - one for street improvements, the other for intersection, then if the Hearing Examiner disagreed and the City ultimately does not prevail and would have to go to Court, at least the deferral would be insured. Ron Nelson asked about the length of the deferral which the applicant had originally requested, that of a 3 year period. He explained that the Fire Department had doubts as to access for emergency purposes, especially in that time frame. Jim Mathews advised that they had no problem with access but with access routes as addressed in the Environmental Review, i.e. , response routes. He went on to say that their approach is one of consistency, i.e. , on projects of larger scale, they have required full access roads to be installed. Mr. Clemens asked the applicant for an estimate and he responded with a 100,000 figure. Mr. Nelson reminded the Board that there was a motion before them on postponing this matter. Jim Mathews withdrew his second to the motion before the Board. Moved by MATHEWS, seconded by CLEMENS, that the deferral be granted in two parts, one for the construction of Edmonds Ave. N.E. , the other OF RED4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O TFO G.0 P SEPS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 30, 1981 TO: Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FRCM: Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator RE CARNER, GARY AND TOM REZONE As requested attached hereto is background information concerning th,, subject rezone. wr Attachments OF R& i A t0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A 0 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 P 91 Eb SEPTE° December 29, 1981 TO:David Clemens, Policy Development Director Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Ron Nelson, Building Official FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner RE:Appeal of Environmental Determination; File No. ECF-091-81 (R-081 -81 ) ; Gary L. Carner. An appeal of the determination of the Environmental Review Committee was received by this office in the above entitled matter on December 28, 1981 . A public hearing to review the appeal has been scheduled for Tuesday, January 12, 1981 at 1 :30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Please forward two copies of all official documents and correspondence concerning this application to our officeno later than 5:00 p.m. , Monday, January 4, 1981 , for review prior to the public hearing. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. J/ez.e-J__ 1/k/A_ Fred J. K Jman Ely to 5O19a 1- OfGv W i r 4NVING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 12 , 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1 . CARNER, GARY AND TOM APPEAL: An appeal by Gary L. Carner of a Final Declaration of Significance issued by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) for property proposed for rezone by Gary and Tom Carner from "G" to B-1 , files ECF-091-81 and R-081-81 , located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street. 2. SCHUMACHER, ROBERT APPEAL: An appeal by Robert Schumacher of a Final Declaration of Significance issued by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) for property proposed for rezone by Robert Schumacher from R-2 to R-3, files ECF-107-81 and R-086-81 , located in the vicinity of 223 Garden Avenue North. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 12, 1981 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: January 1 , 1982 RONALD G. NELSON BUILDING OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 30th day of December, 1981 . OC ___ SIGNED: iffi2narpy.er".____ f. t 4 ?" Coy f CJ T 4 :. GENERAL LOCiATION AND/OR J x S: r w. :,a, LEGAL. DESCRIPTIONON FILE I H PENT O 1 . , ,': : . DEPARTMENT“ 71.°,DING AND 'ZONING IS PO9T1E O NDT1F - - iv t -' u "ism. r4F1' 4001, tC Ir. ,. -. -,,,,,,... 4.:- iff":116 LIMO .r.‘ . L ' ikxs;i1:t4410 TO ELL IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMESEPISi MUP.JICIPAL BUILDING 11:1.~ ..,Fii 1.N 7 7!,RY 12: 1q:-'.........e BEGINNING AT , 9 C 0' A.M. r G s4...3 ITEM REZONE - APPEAL OF 1'IivA'_, G C%.43RAr:r'u: OF :1-G :II'TC.' .NC'y.' PROPOSED REZONE FROM "G" TO B-1 FILES Err-09 i-81 AND R--031-81 a ELFAL PERMIT i SITEi APPROVAL f El C3 PLAT SUBDIVISION.a V l PLACirtkiNED UNIT E L it 1 k : SIG T ..... 4 J NI—Si N!F as ' FIT ;; 7 ;; MINER AY . _____________ _.. r -,r may• . yP:en-li R',yF i.. y-. r ar INFc M'" 'I'ONI CALL.,,AL ,. .. .c' 'r' 4. - P ' aj 9 7 L,Ai 4lf yi AS .-+,T s r x w d4 t+• IFS t/-?"lam`NOT "'".'"' ` Et NI '" i7, °° '' of R4, y oz.THE, CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 1611. ,I i k o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 09gt . 0 SEPE O P December 29, 1981 Mr. Gary L. Carner Flpors & More 13606 S.E. 128th Re i ton, WA 98055 RE: File No. ECF-091 -81 (R-081 -81 ) ; Gary L. Carner; Appeal of Environmental Determination by the Environmental Review Committee. Dear Mr. Carner: In response to the referenced appeal received by this office on December 28, 1981 , a public; hearing has been established for Tuesday, January 12, 1981 at 1 :30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building (second floor) . Please feel free to contact this department if you require further information or assistance regarding this matter. Sin;erely, C c /JL.G*/ f Fred J. Kaufman I'llE! !!Hearing Examiner cc: 'Building & Zoning Department BUILDING DEPART MINT FLOORS & MORE COMPLETE INTERIOR REMODELING CARPETS VINYL COUNTER TOPS CABINETS N .E. 1PBTH RE 255-6765 yRENTON.WA, 95065 RECEIVED December /3, 1981 Mr. F. x,ufirlan C1T' 03 l`ENTO RECEIVED HEARING E .AMIW_R CITY OF F ENTON Hearing Examiner DEC 1981 HEARING EXAMINER City of Renton. 44 NW DEC 3 1981 7181911011111W t2,3141516 AM PM Dear Mr. Kaufman : 71819,10,11,1211,2,3,41516 This lett:er is in regards to the declaration of Environmental Significance issued on November 23, 1981 as to the Rezone Application Noz R-081-e1 and Environmental Checklist No: EfC-o91-81, We waald like to find out why the, planning department feels".2hhat and EIS is necessary. In the proposed declaration of significance dated November 9, 1981 the reason r,or• the proposed declaration was stated to be( concern for sewer and storm daain- age, ) We addressed this issue in our letter of November 12, 1981 upon whitch we received a letter from the rlanning Department dated November 19, 1981 and in this letter the reason for the EIS seams to have changed from the (sewer and storm drainage) to a variety of other things all hypothetical, What if't s' and Mabyt s. Mr. Kaufman we are trying to deal with a real situation not something that might happen down the road a few years, as you know and we know there is no answer to a hypothetical question, So let us please deal with the facts. As stated in our letter of November 12. 1981 we are not planning a large expantion to our store only about 600 s/fo and addressing the original reason for the proposed declaration We are adding no, plumping to the addition and our drainage is not a problem so as to the reason for a EIS we feel that it is in- significant_as to what we are doing, I spoke to Mr, Clemens of the planning department and ask him if our planed addition was the reason for the proposed EIS and he told me no and he told me that everything East of Union Ave. that had been annex in to the City of Renton would MORE THAN A FLOOR STORE" 2 • 4.FLOORS 8 MORE COMPLETE INTERIOR REMODELING CARPETS VINYL COUNTER Tore CABINETS 13606 S.E. 128TH 255-6765RENTON. WA. 913065 December 3, 1981 be required to have and EIS, If we had been told this and that the cost could be between 35,000 and 20,000 dollars from the begaining we would not have filed i- or the rezone because we could not afford to pay for the EII. our plans do fit in with the future plans of' the City for this area. The new reasons given by the planning department for the EIS in there lette of Noveriber 19, 1981 being What might be done with the property if rezoned to B-1 We feel that the City of itentons Building department can and will control the development of this propert ~v by the issueing of permits to us or to anyone that might have this property no matter what the. zoneing is. We do want you to know that we at Floors and More are in full support of any progress as far as sewers and storm drainage for our area and will be happy to help in this all we can. We ag .in appeal the decision of the committee to require an EIS for the re-zoneing of this property at this time. Thank you. Very Truly Yours MORE THAN A FLOOR STORE" BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS December 16, 1981 Renton Municipal Bldg. 9:00 a.m. 4th Floor Conference Room ATTENDEES:Richard Houghton, Chairman Dave Clemens, Policy Development Director Richard Geissler, Fire Chief Ron Nelson, Building Official Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Mike Parness, Administrative Assistant Bob Hulnagle, Parks Department Patricia Porter, Secretary VISITORS: David E. Riggle, 4213 S.E. 4th P1 . Kurt N. Pedersen, 4524 S.E. 4th St. W. Wiles, 262 Union Ave. S.E. David Millard, Land Planning Management Dean Bitney, 105 Factory Ave. N. 1 . CALL TO ORDER - The meeting was called to order by Chairman Houghton at 9:05 a.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Moved by GEISSLER, seconded by NORRIS, that the minutes of the December 2, 1981 meeting be approved as read. MOTION CARRIED 3. CORRESPONDENCE: Information letter from John D. Edwards of the Renton Center regarding off-site improvements on Edwards Street west and north of Shopping Center and their scheduling of same. 4. REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL: None 5. REFERRALS FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS: a. Application for Variance, 1715 Monterey Ave. N.E. , Kirkman Konstruction Co. Ron Nelson indicated that he had gone to the site to look at the driveway and advised the applicant that if he showed the City the way they would control the drainage for the property owner and a cross section for the driveway he felt there would be no problem. Discussion followed about where the drainage would go and a recommendation that a 6" pipe (minimum) with cleanouts in it be used. Moved by NELSON, seconded by CLEMENS, that application be approved subject to Building Department' s conditions. MOTION CARRIED b. Application for Variance, 4508 N. E. 4th, Gary & Tom Carner. Inasmuch as not enough information was available motion was made by NELSON, seconded by CLEMENS, that the matter be ccitinued to the next Public Works meeting and ask the applicant to be present. MOTION CARRIED 6. NEW BUSINESS: None 7. OLD BUSINESS: a. Street ITprovements, Union Ave. S.E. , Leisure Estates - Request Reconsideration of Board' s FormeT.- Decision—Tfiutting sidewalks in on opposite side of street from improvements which was denied). A letter from Mr. Bitney was read F R4 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Z o emm BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235- 2593 O9ITFO SI:P1°° December 10, 1981 Mr . Gary L. Carner Floors & More 13606 S.E. 128th Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. ECF-091-81 (R-081-81 ) ; Gary L. Carner, Appeal of Environmental Determination. Dear Mr. Carner: Subsequent to telephone contact by this office, it was drawn to my attention that a final declaration of significance has not yet been isued for the referenced application. An appeal cannot be filed on a proposed declaration, and, therefore, the public hearing tentatively scheduled for December 29, 1981 will not be held as you were previously informed. Should a final determination of the Environmental Review Committee indicate that the proposal will have a significant impact on the environment , and a final declaration of significance issued, your right of appeal within fourteen days of that decision remains in eff ct . If -ou require further assistance or information regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Fred J . KNifman Os ktjVHearingExaminer c-ckVFb O cc: /Planning Department DEC 101981 N NC 'DEQP NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following project: CITY OF RENTON (ECF-109-81) Application for environmental review of traffic computer replacement proposal. CITY OF RENTON (ECR-110-81) Application for environmental review of language amendments to the Zoning Ordinance clarifying ambiguous zoning actions between 1954 and 1961. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has also issued a final declaration of significance for the following project: CARNER, TOM AND GARY (ECF-091-81) Application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business, file R-081-81; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street. Further information regarding these actions is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by December 28, 1981. Published: December 14, 1981 FIB. DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-081-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-091-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from "G" to B-1 to expand existing floor covering store business. Proponent: GARNER, TOM & GARY Location of Proposal: Vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on October 28, 1981 , November 4 , 1981 , and December 9, 1981 , following a presenta- tion by Roger Blaylock of the Building Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson, David Clemens , Richard Houghton, Donald Monaghan, Roger Blaylock and Steve Munson. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-091-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: October 14 , 1981 2) Applications: R-081-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Utilities Engineering Division, Police Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Building Department and Fire Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental significance: The decision was based upon the Committee' s concerns in the following areas : sewer and storm drainage. Signatures: 7 l onald G. Nelson David R. lemens Building Official Policy Development Director Rard C. Houghto4, Public Works Direct r DATE OF PUBLICATION: December 14 , 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD:December 28, 1981 Date circulated : Comments due : ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 091 - 81 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-081-81 PROPONENT : CARNER, TOM AND GARY PROJECT TITLE : REZONE Brief Description of Project : Request to rezone site from "G" to B-1 to expand existing floor covering store business. LOCATION : Vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street SITE AREA : +.49 acre BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :X 3 ) Water & water courses : X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life : x 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : Undeveloped east : Undeveloped south : Commercial West : Undeveloped Land use conflicts : Possible if improperly developed. View obstruction : Cannot be determined. 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : x 12 ) Number of Dwellings : X 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 15 x 6 = 30 ADT traffic impacts : Major downstream from site. 14 ) Public services : I x x 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities : X X 17 ) Human health : x 18 ) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : x COMMENTS : Possible significant impacts due to traffic, sanitary sewers and storm drainage. Recommend t ' on : DOS X More Information i FORM: ERC-06 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2, 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 : 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS Parker, C.A. : ECF-085-81/PPUD-078-81 Schumacher, Robert: ECF-095-81/R-086-81 OLD BUSINESS ECF-091-81 CARNER, GARY L. AND TOM R-081-81 Request for reconsideration of Proposed Declaration of Significance: Application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business ; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N. E. 4th Street. NEW BUSINESS ECF-097-81 BROWN, LARRY M./MOODY, DONALD A. R-091-81 Application for rezone from G to L-1 ; property located on the north and south sides of S.W. Grady Way between Oaksdale Ave. S.W. and Longacres Dr. S.W. (Tax Lots 53 & 54) HIGHLAND VILLAGE For Review: Responses to Preliminary draft for Highland Village DEIS. 4, - I a 1 'JUMP" ' Environmental Review CommitteeDecember 2, 1981 4111/ __Met6 1l* I AWN 4 1 I:, ——---1 Ilet r/Alir'41! 11 .--- 4 11- 1 air L I I 1i•- LAKE r .' it ! 1 tiP4" eINN. WASHINGTON 1Cr' f 1lil AFANAI1 Illiiist=.• ..... : VUINIVAII=411 an I a cT4Ii1!Pit114.640,-- ii,..t '.4Iwoepui - ii .. )\ q.les ..-- 71 - 1 Lt 1,„_. Ali t . iii ,.---\----------- .- -----,4-7-1141091: ii. i il I I /^ic Brown/Moody yiHIGHLAND‘ 6,„1?-4'*.# VILLAGE Ito,lii.' 4kV Ar. ; 10 ' 1 ws. v,..—.4 .1.. 0 dom.,- i • ir..... 418211 Irik, ! WINEIblik f .* tile I aMEIv L.4l Ili Mgt% iim. es. 4, vy P" MOM r''' it IIIltIIM C -' miliI I i t WA OF i 46 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9- 0 co' 235- 2550 O• 947. SEPt co- November 19, 1981 Gary L. Carner 3405 Talbot Road South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Carner: On November 18, 1981, the Environmental Review Committee considered your letter of November 12, 1981, in which you sought reconsideration of the proposed Declaration of Significance for your planned addition. The Committee concluded that, if a Declaration of Non-significance were issued and the site subsequently rezoned, a greater variety and intensity of uses would be possible than is presently allowed or proposed as you indicate. Therefore, the proposed Declaration of Significance is affirmed, and the decision stands. A final declaration of significance will be issued following expiration of the current appeal period November 23rd) and a new appeal period established to expire on Decem- ber 13th (two weeks following a November 29th date of publication) . If you have further questions, contact this office. Very truly yours, IV,1:444417-4-L- Steve Munson Assistant Planner SM:wr r • i ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 18, 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. : FOURTH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS : Parker , C .A. : ECF-085-81/PPUD-078-81 Schumacher , Robert : ECF-095-81/R-086-81 OLD BUSINESS : ECF-091-81 CARNER, GARY L. AND TOM R-081-81 Request for reconsideration of Proposed Declaration of Significance : Application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business ; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street NEW BUSINESS : L. I . D. #314 Request by Design Engineering Division for concurrence in ERC ' s findings of December 14, 1980 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Information on H .O. V. (High Occupancy Vehicle) improvements to FAI-405 from SR-900 to Factoria 1 \ b I N. EL .•41 j 1I \ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE irk . NOVEMBER 18, 1981 i ii 1MI. IL 1- I w.\ c, 10:00 A.M. 1-1 411.4% 4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM i I . i 1 .11 , LiLl g. i, Ic‘A- 1 NN i • -'-- s.._. LAKE tt ire 'Niik,• ., W NASHINGTO . `,illj i... IN\ N., women e Ill eit ; Ig irktb i tf- 1111117idiiiit-ilwal 411 EL- ."":.I., ii iiiVea:,.,, .11. 3=ri, . DOT/HOV irilrA 11:110111 --- j-- 111 X tirillpr L Ea \ sou4 ( 11 mimeo ...1 i 1 111 lb vim -E I Witl--=11 tt — 1 I 111PL- I \ . 111%k`a.hik- agOA 44 " 14 - '' no-.- 49 Awl .CARMIIITI 11111•Mijr--411164LPM111, qmo ,-, SCHUMACHER i -1/41pOIFF- 1 (--- '--- ' • --.Nal"\ftw"itMlihire.1 10V4 1 E tii 1 wp,. . , I 11\• , 4,41,g/r41711/J9 ill 1 II V't IV:IIIPM M I--:":-40 5-AincEIR 1 4.4E16-10111111 a 1 I 1 7. - 11,12_11.11111 N. t--Ir Al MINITHIWIRFA., -. lel- 745111MIIN4 , , ...], LID 31 111114111M10747:111 oRt 17 • i i" .1 fa-\\ N • 1rF le i ! \ r_. r. U I 1 pi 1 tIII t- sl II —.--- r--.. a,a3C 1 1 TO 1 51r1_ , Ai 1 LAKE I I — rouniGs I r 1 1 FLOORS & MORE ORO CI OF KE1 TpN COMPLETE INTERIOR REMODELING fai I CARPETS VINYL COUNTER TOPS CABINETS 0 1360E S.E. 120TH 255.6765 r v 12 1981 RENTON, WA. 98055 BUILDHJG DEPARTMENT Mr. Ronald a. Nelson November 12, 1981 Sit in regards to your proposed declaration of significance dated November 9, 1981 in connection with the rezone application No. R-081-81 and Environmental checklist no: EC;F-091-81, We would like to' ask you to reconsider your declaration for these reasons- . Sewer r Cur sewer needs will not change from the past for we do not have any plumbing to add to our proposed additionfcur needs consist of one bath room in whithh there is one tolet an one sink. Our sewer system .works very good for our needs and presents no uroblems to us or: our neighbors. Storm drainage: The size of addition we propose is 24r X241 or 576 S, a roof this size could be compaired to'-a average garage. We truly feel this will cause no major or minor impact on our area, even in the most severe of storms we have no problem with drainage. The reason we need the zoneing changed for our properity is basically we need storage room, We have been in business at this location fpr about two years and we feel that our proprity should be zoned for business . We do ftel that a EIS at this time would be impractical for us with the development we plan. JE do wish to ask you gentleman to reconsider your declaration at this time and will wate to here from you. Yours very truly, MORE THAN A FLOOR STORE" ik,s( JOHN SPELLMAN LANEBERENTSON Governor c, ' Secretary STATE(>E\A,ASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (206)753-6005 November 3, 1981 t Gordon Y. Ericksen, Director City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 908055 Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Interstate 405 North Renton Interchange to Factoria Interchange Dear Mr. Ericksen: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has developed plans to construct High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Improvements on a 6.02 mile section of Interstate 405 between SR 900 and Factoria (Milepost 4.58 to Milepost 10.60). The project is located in portions of Renton and Bellevue, in addition to unincorporated KingCounty. The project itself will consist of three distinct elements. The three major elements will be the provision of a right shoulder HOV lane on Interstate 405 for the entire length of the project; the construction of a 140-car park and ride lot at May Creek Interchange Milepost 6.63); and the construction of two half-mile sections of bicycle/pedestrian trail between May Creek Interchange and Coal Creek Interchange (MP 7.92 to MP 8.55 and MP 9.77 to MP 10.25). In addition to these improvements, the existing roadway will be resurfaced between the North Renton and the May Creek Interchanges. In coordination with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and other state and local agencies, the proposed improvements have been developed as documented in the general and specific goals of transportation plans for this region. The WSDOT and FHWA prepared and made available to the public, an Environmental Assessment in response to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, which identifies the social, economic, and environmental impacts of the proposed action. The Environmental Assessment was available for public review and comment for a period of 30 days. The Notice of Availability appeared in the Seattle Times and the Seattle Post Intelligencer on December 19, 1980. Comments were accepted through January 19, 1981. On October 26, 1981 the Federal Highway Administration determined that this project will not have any significant impact on the human environment. Gordon Y. Ericksen, Director City of Renton November 3, 1981 Page 2 Anyone desiring a copy of the FONSI and/or the Environmental Assessment may contact any of the following offices: Mr. Paul C. Gregson or Mr. M. A. Smith FHWA Division Administrator Location-Design Engineer Federal Highway Administration Washington State Department Suite 501, Evergreen Plaza of Transportation 711 South Capitol Way Highway Administration Building Olympia, Washington 98501 Olympia, Washington 98504 or D. L. Hoffman District Design Engineer Washington State Department of Transportation 6431 Corson Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98108 Very truly yours, a A44eite M. A. SMITH, P. E. Location-Design Engineer MAS:M4/207 LAB (PP) cc: J. D. Zirkle P. C. Gregson, FHWA INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date November 9, 1981 TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM: Donald G. Monaghan SUBJECT: L• I • D. 314 Having completed the final plans for the improvements to be installed under the above mentioned project, it is requested that you concur in the committee' s findings of December 24, 1980. C o- DGM:pmp The plans are available in Engineering. PROPOSED DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-081-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-091-81 Description of Proposal: Request to rezone site from "G" to B-1 to expand existing floor covering store business . Proponent : CARNER, TOM & GARY Location of Proposal: Vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on October 28, 1981 and November 4 , 1981 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson, David Clemens, Richard Houghton, Ronald Monaghan, Roger Blaylock and Steve Munson. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-091-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: October 14 , 1981 2) Applications : R-081-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Utilities Engineering Division, Police Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Building Department, and Fire Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS may be required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental significance: The decision was based upon the Committee' s concerns in the following areas : sewer and storm drainage. Signatures : a"-IU44 Ronald G. Nelson id R. Clemens, Acting Building Official Planning Director RiA1A7(4/(-& atr c . rd C. Houghton, Pu c Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: November 9, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: November 23, 2981 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a proposed declaration of significance for the following project : CARNER, TOM & GARY (ECF.-091 -81 ) Application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business, file R-081-81 ; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street. the Environmental Review Committee (ERC has issued a final declaration of significance for the following project: LAKE TERRACE PARK ASSOCIATES (Steve Harer) (ECF-095-81 ) Application for rezone from T to R-3 to allow future development of condominiums or adult apartments, file R-090-81 ; property located in the vicinity of 21 Lake Washington Blvd. N. Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by November 23, 1981 . Published: November 9 , 1981 N OT I C - ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION PROPOSED ACTION RFOUFST TO RF7ONF SITE FROM "G" TO B-1 TO EXPAND EXISTING FLOOR COVERING STORE BUSINESS , GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS VICINITY OF 45Q8N .E . 4TH STREET . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON NVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ( E. R.C. AS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION, DOES FIDOES NOT, HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE IRON- MENT. AY BE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, EJWILL NOT, BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., NOVEMBER 23, 1981 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 4 EMVIkOMMEMTAL REVILE COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 4, 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 : 00 A .M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS Carner, Gary L . and Tom Parker , C . A . NEW BUSINESS ECF-095-81 SCHUMACHER , ROBERT R-086-81 Application for rezone from R-2 to R-3 to allow construction of a 9-unit apartment building ; property located at 223 Garden Avenue North. HIGHLAND VILLAGE For distribution: Preliminary draft for Highland Village EIS . ERADCO ROAD Request by Mr. Colt of Mt . Olivet Cemetery regarding City ' s position on existing road leading to ERADCO property . OF I? ti/ 40 THE CITY OF PENTONuADMUNICIPALBUILDING200MILLAVESO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 osum BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 235- 2550o 9TF SEP11-- MEMORANDUM DATE: 29 Qctober 1981 TO: All Reviewing City Departments FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Carner Rezone, R-081-81 Supplimental Information The applicant is requesting a rezone of approximately half an acre to allow the expansion of his carpet business. The attached site plan shows the proposed immediate addition of 675 square feet. This will be used for storage. The design eliminates access to the rear; however, the applicant intends to remove the existing house and build new offices to the north of the proposed addition in the future. The septic tank system is intented to continue at the present time to provide sewage service. PLEASE RETURN COMMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE BY TUESDAY NOVEMBER 3RD AT 5 PM. 1 ;; Ii0 ice i I ! IH L ' IH I I i: ! II ii! I c ( . { i / ' / ( 71 If 1 ( i f i 1 ii 1 1 I.I 1 I j1 HIi Il I , i , III II, 1 !ji! ,1111 I I I I, , , , •I l i I_ , __ , I,. i, : . .I I II ii ‘f I, ._., a„,,,, i.: ' , , I I, : , II I I t \i t i t° ' Ini ,liIii c 0, 1 , l i I I „ / , 1 I f ,: T I ,,: i, . ,, i _ _. . ; ,II .7--z__._ -_-7............, ( .,,,i I, 1 ! i - i _ lat iiii: :: /,:.,. i. i :if 1,i, ii . ijI 1 i4, 4 I I I f ir I f N_ ,......„.._\..‘....._%._,:. ! i I i ; CfteEt 2E2010E SITE P44W iV , . 4/ S t. 12. 081 - 81 r 42.. ()btu. 8(I ATTENTIONIMINIVUMBUIL1;!;40 SET:2,-*CKS I FRONT YARD I SIDE YARD 3—I n r 1 R N.' r=r) r............1.1— t• ; :Hi si.R: ;,::)..: • ic.. rs 44t,t:ED TAI A.7c-- I 1 1 1 1---13 — DpAcposE I 41) D i ri-oP N. i I cNt 4 I 1. 3 Z A. 5 I 1 1 I i2) 1 r, i 74-, r, C•iel 1-e' . 4111 --Zr' i INTER—OFFICE MEMO TO: Planning Department DATE October 30, 1981 FROM: Fire Department RE: Corner Rezone, R-081-81 - 4508 N.E. 4th Street Previous to building new offices to the north of the proposed addition , 20 foot access will be required with turn around. ED WOOTON Fire Inspector EVW:mbt OF R THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 90 235— 2550 0 SEP'c O P MEMORANDUM DATE: 29 Qctober 1981 TO: All Reviewing City Departments FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Carner Rezone, R-081-81 Supplimental Information The applicant is requesting a rezone of approximately half an acre to allow the expansion of his carpet business. The attached site plan shows the proposed immediate addition of 675 square feet. This will be used for storage. The design eliminates access to the rear; however, the applicant intends to remove the existing house and build new offices to the north of the proposed addition in the future. The septic tank system is intented to continue at the present time to provide sewage service. PLEASE RETURN COMMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE BY TUESDAY NOV£MBER 3RD AT 5 PM. 474 i=//- C/L'G r NCB',?/'V 5 '6 ' `L vrr/ t'l//r' OF R4,A 4, 16 THE CITY OF RENTON 0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTJN, WASH. 98055 o 'BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT co- . 235- 2550 OgTo SEP1etl° MEMORANDUM DATE: 29 October 1981 TO: All Reviewing City Departments FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Carner Rezone, R-081-81 Supplimental Information The applicant is requesting a rezone of approximately half an acre to allow the expansion of his carpet business. The attached site plan shows the proposed immediate addition of 675 square feet. This will be used for storage. The design eliminates access to the rear; however, the applicant intends to remove the existing house and build new offices to the north of the proposed addition in the future. The septic tank system is intented to continue at the present time to provide sewage service. PLEASE RETURN COMMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE BY TUESDAY NOVEMBER 3RD AT 5 PM. o/? /8/ OF I?i iv o THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 umUBARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 90 235- 2550 9gT O SEP-ce O MEMORANDUM DATE: 29 Qctober 1981 TO: All Reviewing City Departments FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Carner Rezone, R-081-81 Supplimental Information The applicant is requesting a rezone of approximately half an acre to allow the expansion of his carpet business. The attached site plan shows the proposed immediate addition of 675 square feet. This will be used for storage. The design eliminates access to the rear; however, the applicant intends to remove the existing house and build new offices to the north of the proposed addition in the future. The septic tank system is intented to continue at the present time to provide sewage service. PLEASE RETURN COMMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE BY TUESDAY NOVEMBER 3RD AT 5 PM. 4/1/1 CCO/t. t/VL S TOE . OF RAL P Z. THE CITY OF RENTON4$ © MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 CD. 235- 2550 9l hF0 SEPjE4 MEMORANDUM DATE: 29 Qctober 1981 TO: All Reviewing City Departments FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Carner Rezone, R-081-81 Supplimental Information The applicant is requesting a rezone of approximately half an acre to allow the expansion of his carpet business. The attached site plan shows the proposed immediate addition of 675 square feet. This will be used for storage. The design eliminates access to the rear; however, the applicant intends to remove the existing house and build new offices to the north of the proposed addition in the future. The septic tank system is intented to continue at the present time to provide sewage service. PLEASE RETURN COMMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE BY TUESDAY NOVEMBER 3RD AT 5 PM. 41I" .‘ r - X ATTENTION 2-081 " SI 11 iMINIMUM6L'11131:4GSETE3pAs 11FRONTYARD ISIDEYARD VAI-N,N 7 i ..tti••i R; :.::,..:. . ,.? • ..1.;:.,..!-cp r SEPTIC9 I z10 ---1.1 1PPcposED 4. 4DDirioP 1 N.. N N I1 3 1 1 I C.) i.r) 1 iv .1 .... L..! Meft70r,C0L 4 .a 4i lb J 1 itk.,.,,d 406...1.......i I jIi j I j ! jf / f / ( 7J i , fififiii5 i Iz •I I . ii 1 I 1 II il ' L : illiiilili ! 1 f! II . 1 ' iljh ' . 1 ' ' II III 4I IIit rI{ I i 1 { iriIII. r Ii ' i I I 1 t 11 ! ! I V/ I r I . 141 ' ‘k i I 11 : . ,: I:HI • 1 ! . I ! 1 1 0 i i•( ' itiA , .. 1 1 — 1 ' it ;; V a CAer1e REZoi ) 444 SITE PLI3N a-g N. C. 'tithe ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 21 , 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS Sea-Port Dozing, Inc. : ECF-587-80/B-236 OLD BUSINESS ECF-092 INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY (JERRY IVY) SA-082-81 Application for site approval to SM-94-81 construct four tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses in M-P zone and associated application for Substantial Development Permit; property located on the east side of West Valley Road approximately 1/4 mile north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the Green River. ECF-087-81 MacGREGOR, ROBERT STAFFORD R-079-81 Application for rezone from G-6000 to L-1 to allow use as a carpet cleaning business with associated storage; property located in the vicinity of 194 S.W. 16th Street. ECF-091-81 CARNER, GARY L. AND TOM R-081-81 Application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street. NEW BUSINESS COUNTY COMMENT ON CITY OF RENTON CONCERNS REGARDING LIBERTY VIEW ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION. ECF-094-81 SMITH-RING CENTURY 21 B-267 Request to install one (1 ) 3 'x4 ' double-sided off-premise sign at S.W. corner of Union Avenue N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. V 1 King County0 State of Washington Ron Dunlap, County Executive Department of Planning and 1 Community Development A Gary S. Tusberg, Director W226 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 206) 344-7503 October 9, 1981 Mr. David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Environmental Review Committee City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Environmental Declaration File No. 1081-24 Liberty View Dear Mr. Clemens : The Building and Land Development Division has reviewed those concerns expressed in your letter of September 24, 2981. These issues are currently being reviewed in more detail by the affected departments. If deemed necessary, additional studies will be required of the applicant prior to pre- liminary approval, i.e. , traffic and/or drainage studies. The Building and Land Development Division will reexamine the original negative declaration. A staff report will deal with those issues raised by your environmental review committee, or the plat hearing will be placed on call pending analysis of the required supplemental studies. incerely, Gary S. Tusbera Director GST :rj till ' is! 7 ' imp 11ENVIRONMENTALREVIEWCOMMITTEEkMI $ g a c C OCTOBER 21, 1981 1 di 4\ _ I Ili L alli - .1 - bib 1 FbkV4'LAKE J . 1 ! i.€ N4 N,, WASHINGTON SMITH-RING CENTURY 21 it:. d`,4;, ft • I r CARNER N alL . illtimow ,', SNIP imi.. . 1 :,\ 1 lik Alitili=comi Millir i_l_ ...._;.--7-_---- \\ .4I11k nB 1 NIN '.'-, \ 1IliVeld= 4"CM111 tl ij ii' gm11,:W, 1I. ..I liIjN4i0.1r maa--.1 1"1111111-1111 111111;01A / r _____, Ill 4, iino mow* II 11 1: , upir vo MacGREGOR f Ifs 1I -: --INa i1 i a r.i 1 Siftt LIBERTY VIEW r MI INDUSTRIAL PARK k U .I L a iti 1 I 1 l i 4 l 1 _ AKE fi J1 " o L± II J I rcevision s/ IWiI fa/`/A/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET tieApplication: 2,i,i 1'Q 21_-a/)--, e Coetf 'coo", T• Si e 4.2 pe.4 g , t eQ -1 10 e p 41 oxisfe l -aOrc c:l ,fi r.bu,.t rys — - Location: akt y,-pc,vV" 9th 0-7 Applicant: 641Ir11er I;, g Gatr t Public Works Department Enginee 'ng Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: /D/3/8/ Tr is Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: .0''''' 1:2. t'lities Eng. Division L , ire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON 1.0/167/Pi REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: - Ji- 0 Approved proved with Conditions Not Approved TIC CS .-7 Gf--C C/'C/CY / 3-///t/-L /=C_ c e; / - re Ge/ I // 3- Q/` a Ty %/ a, S r DATE: `l) ‘f Signature of Director or Autho ized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : —ti-T7f /7-y , Approved [2Approved with Conditions Not Approved R.actgrg /PPe0 44 oiv.e.y . Fv7u,e £ N -e_,v7o pens&x1T cc& '/ y cstf /-x.. MI T A i-,c... ` Q U •cfrt F crry 1-IY y (s/1 N /5 r n /w, File co•pos j.a, Aka.e,t4.t. ,v-tic' ) DATE: Ct7. a/ !Jey Signature of Director or Authorized Representative UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO 1 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER NO LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER NO SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE WATER 1 cz m.• GoKX C SYSTEMDEYELOPMEGT CHARGE • SEVER JJ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • WATER No SPECIAL ASSESSMFNT AREA CHa:?GE - SEWER NO APPROVE; WATER PLAN NO s APPROVED SEWER PLAN NO APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS vet, Revision 3/1981 MA/s/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: C C $L-Be) IP uesf "coo." s% TtCrodi" 46 B4 -to ei p S o c s'ti_, or t%,s7ote bus: ass pLocation:ilith l jj 4C/ gy Listi /f 4/ 10- Applicant: Ceat/ o f Car TO:DPublic Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:10 0 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ..."'"— Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department B ' ding Department Police Department Ei Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON AD/10/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1) Put in all off site improvements 2) A two way left turn lane is need in this area the developer should agree to participate in the cost of installation. Also should look at how far back sidewalks should be set to accomadate a two way left turn lane. A two way turn lane would greatly enhance access to this site. Lt. DZ on DATE:10/9/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative n c v I I V 11 J/ 1 70 1 / aAgsy RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: IE44te_CA kat A /C20. 1 •------vCff S t o.. t 8-I 'fp p ct . isfirj•Lelo il Slott 6vsistrfs Location : Vicieti fyd€ _9_,VolftgE 9th to-dt Applicant: C€ii , er, iplVL GRr7 TO:Public rks Department ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: /D/By fr Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: a."'" Id lities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON AP/Ii9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: ld4Ye7SignatureofDirectororAuorizedeprsentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Revision 3/1981 /0/49/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:_filt.20L9 c R •O g,Bl) A.,vesf "coo. . Si 7<e i , I 'r BSI 'fo`I. r olcl ill U-0.orc `r;Aq,S7or. e'Ss Location:iltrou.i yd liSpeiVe'th I• Applicant: arser 7 ' G*r y TO:Public Works Department En ' eering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:/09 8/ raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON 110/10/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: i 6 Approved '4proved with Conditions Not Approved o 64, en4/:_gjek.) 7,4 C z DATE: ro , Signature of Director or Authorized Re.presentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Kevision 3/1981 /0/6/2/ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:ecA - l-48, v.„f ee300. 714e cv-0 Location:__ joy ve/ /E iett :m Applicant : impit f. cRr = --- --- — Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:JO,/// B/ Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: -0°"--- Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Park epartment uilding Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON AO/AV S)/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : L.d7 Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved e— Aore% DATE: je -- P , Signature of D. or or Authorizer Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date circula : ! g/6/ a/8/D// E CVIR hHEhtTAL CIILCKLI`'T Lor its due : REVIEU SHEET ICE -01,_ - IL_. APPLICATION No (s ) . 12'4049 1/ PROPONENT : C'aP$er1 1 . >F it__ry - PROJECT TITLE :Z Brief Description of Project : Rev,e 70I!'awro! SIl fro AA Iie v ,ro Q I Q l 19 • p '4WC.Wiiy Veer c,de rieti 4.4yiI AV fib,ess LOCATION : ''ct' 47 G( SSo8,16 9 ij SITE AREA : t .feldI+C'rt BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (40) : ...a IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 1 Z ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water d water courses : J ) Plant life : i; Animal lift : v/ 6 ) Naise : i! f (7 ' Light glare : t' ' • Lund Use ; north : east : south : west : land use conflicts : View obstruction : r 9 ) Natural resources : V/ lll ) Risk of upset : 1 ! ) fupulotion/Lmployment : 1;: ) Nu:.ber of Dwellings : v/ 13 ) Trip ends UAL ) : troffi , ir.pacts : 1- ; PuO1 tc ;ervicr J11 ' ) t no I)V - _ t, l; lit : Y H:. ian 1c 1 t .. L_- 1o ) c th t i — l C,:WENi5 : r,.•ca-)mnc:ida , : on : J1 , : -_ OS More Information rievieved by : l .itle :_ -",( //f.../s/' ; 72 V 1: Li:-ht- Date circula : /o g/61 Car its due : a 51,/ LX It UPWENTAL I'H[CK pp L I. T R EVIElJ SHEET E C F lZ( APPLICATION No (s ) . 09'408/41/ PROPONENT : CAI"N fir ow eGI se PROJECT TITLE :1472 Brief Description of Project : Prioefde pe aAt s i? from u E •1 19 •p1O 4P,t•'Sie iy Vottreoverifty .rhy • s6utioess . LOCATION : X'CMi{1 il508H/E 9 SITE AREA : / .119q,Cre BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : .. IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : c 1 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) ;Dater & eater courses : 4 ) Plant life : y i) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : I — 7 ) Light & glare : I 4( 1 8 ) • Land Use ; north : east : south : vest : land use conflicts : 1Z-6-5 4 z 114 Viet/ obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 1 ! ) Population/Employment : x 12 ) Number of Ouel 1 ings 15 ) Trip ends ( tit ) : traffic i .pict . 1 P;i l it .:,civic(- 16 ) th i1it tc.'. 17 ) Hur.tan ne 1t ;1 ii ) Acsthetic-, . I 19 ) Recreation : O Archeology/h.r , t iry __ COMMENTS : fi,.!rommendat ion : J' i1 —DOS More Information Rev'iejed by : 1 itle : gi,Q g_ Da . 4_"- 1: CRC-Ot Date circula : /® g/6 Cor its due :14?&AtieE 'VIR XNEINTAL CHECIKLI'-T REVIEU SHEET ECF -O / - 81 APPLICATION No (s ) . 44'408/4/ PROPONENT : Caroler, ?ewe lr jR w J y i PROJECT RE,24VE Brief Description of Project h J etuvet`i .•,re#40 site fro .% G ro 8-1 iQ •tp.w.l.x.•sf,•eir Voorreove 4Av • ,bul;sNes . LOCA T ION : j'CIAi41 iC t SO8AeE 9' 7'' SITE AREA : T .1{gacre BUILDING AREA (gross ) JLVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : — IMPACT REVIEW NONL MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : I 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water h cater courses : 4 ) Plant life : Animal life :1/" 6 ) Noise : y 7 ) Light & glare : F.— H1 • Lind Use ; north : east : south : vest : land use conflicts : Viet obstruction : 9 ) Nitura.l resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : l/ 1 ! ) CJpu1 . t ion/Lc ploynent : w 1'4. ) Nui.ber of Ovel 1 inys : 1 3 ) Trip ends l t f l ) : sf- /,S'" 7"41 o20 traffic i.L )Jct : • 1-.7i 14 ; Pui) 1 is 3ervicr, _— I J_ 1 ) t rrerr1y _ . l ---- 16 ) ti, flit ie i_l____. —I17 ) Ht.,raan ,reulth : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) E;cereatiun : v 2_ ) Archeology/history COMMENTS : R. commenda , ion : DV) 1 v DOS More Informationion iie ieued by : azzi-r5..y<72a...._.,1 .iL1e : r,4 c. _:/.al/is74-' Da ,,: : /V.0 1 :: , i.- -Ot; Date circula : ! 6/6i poi its due : //0071V61/E IVIR hHEiNTAL CHLCKLI'-T REtlIEU SHEET ECF -WI_ - SL APPLICATION No (s ) . 44'08/4* PROPONENT : CAPMPr) 1 vP% VG—arry PROJECT TITLE :P 'Z6— Brief Description of Project : Pelve admit .S/T front /V ,ro f8-11, •0)..*.19x.We l Voor e OVIIP ri 574, • htif Ne:: LOCH T ION : iciti41 Se YSO$wwe f•tft 41">, SITE AREA : t .y ?d.creBUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic.: changes : 1.- 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :1/ 3 ) Water & water courses : Plant life : 4 I 0--' 1 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : I _-- _ ', ____T._ t; ) . Land Use ; north : south : vest : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Nuber of Dwellings : - 13 ) Trip ends ( Iif ) : traffic iA•psets . l FUhl is .>ervic c I v 1 `, ) Hi Orgy : 16 ) li i1it i Na 7 ) Hunan neJltss : _ 16 ) Acsthct i - 1__ _L _ .-_ 19 ) ficc r r, L i n T- f', .,,'smmondu ; ion : —ON'; I x • DOS ____._ djre Information Reviewed by : !- lido :- D a t : i V/8AL__. C — L‘l: iRC-O6 Date circulr I : l0 6,/6i/ Co nts due : a0,/ /8/ MIR NHEINTAL CHLEIKLIFT REVIEU SHEET E C F -1)491_,_ - IE APPLICATION No (s ) . 44%08/4/ PROPONENT : CASP men 1#010% ft j1 ry PROJECT TITLE :RE-44We- Brief Description of Project : ip.'v,,,H. rl140II0 sy fro .0% 16 Ye 84 1. •lpo .eit.VII Voor e to Ve riAip 424, • Ao fin IfS . LOCATION : 1'C.A141 pi S1SD8HE 912 A SITE AREA : t .Ygctcre BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : .. IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 1 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & voter coulJes ; 4 ) Plant life : animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light c4 glare : 1 1 Land Use ; north : oast outh : vast land use conflicts : Vice obstruction : 9 ) N.tural rc:;uurces : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Popul:tiur%i_moloyr ent : 12 ) Nuhiber of Luellins : i 13 ) Trip ends ( tit ) : traffic i.r,taacts : 14 ; Public 3ervIccs : 7— j I ', ) Ener)y : 16 ) U.. ilit let: 17 ) Hu;.ian Health : 18 ) Aesthc't lv;> Y 19 ) Rccroation 2 1 1 ) Archeo1og . i4.i ; tort' :H L i 1MENT` This is a logical rezone for this area, and as the business is currently operating this change should not have an impact on the police operations. See Development Application Review Sheet for further comments. ommHJat ion : \•il DOS More Informationcxxx n v i e v e d b y . T4ArE ,rS 4la.__..__ 1 l t i e Da ‘v J1/9/81.. _., -__._._. .- _..--... A1: ERC-C Date circulate /d CA/ Comm, ,,, s due :Q E TlVIR r;'HEAJTafu CHECIKLI`'T REVIEU SHEET ECF -O9.1_ - .$1 APPLICATION No (s ) . 04)41.40$/4* PROPONENT : G.. A rhPrt ?OOK f G r y PROJECT TITLE :REZQ I IBriefDescriptionofProject. : 10E1 40pe2,,Ae i h fro" I v` TO 8-4 10 ' p#• 1Px•'Sre' 'FtoorroverI 574) • hol:"sss . LOCATION : if 0hi4y de %S0$ii 9& SITE AREA : T ,YggiCre.BUILDING AREA (gross ) --- m• DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : . IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 1 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5) Animal life : 1"</: 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north :v Ste_ east :_____ 0.24.e w. south : _$.1 1 6. (Cs-tietv O' ecc- west : Ili e Land use con II i c Is : ____P e 71p hay ItA I e*s 6 evesi- View obstruction : 00/ 9 ) Natural resources : r 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment :I 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( 1TE ) : traffic impacts : T !/ 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 1.---"" 16 ) Utilities : LJ 17 ) Human health : C ld ) Aesthetics : My _ 19 ) Recreation : 211 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information __ Reviewed by : 67i4trefil1/4/Sen 1 itle : /1_____ D a L e :____ _.: g FORM: ERC-06 o/614/ c.(] duo : i_eokR4/1610eiXVIt '%iE XIAL Ci1Le"' I I ''1 UEVI[_U SIICE1 yt1 c c F -OIL_._ - .$L APPLICATIUN INo(s ) . 4.(4- 8/4.4g/ PROPONENT : /G... ArMP1r', !0ol'' IrG1 f yt I PROJECT 1 1 1 LE :126'2Q, # i3rxe Dt scription ar Pro getido . i IQ' mllt •/. froetn tr.sT 64 1Q 4'iC•'S¢i'y 'loorro gert` S , v host ove5S LOCAiIUN : 'C.o s jy 1/S08HE 949 SITE AREA : T .cgcccre BUILDING AREA (cjroc,:; ) LVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : -_•. IMPACT REVIEW NUNL tIINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic chaneic:; : Y I 2 ) Direct/Indirect air t);taliLy : v/ 3 ) Water d vat e'r cuttrje :: : V 4 ) Plant lira : v M) 1) ,1ntmal life' . I Ligltt A glare . I t; ', • Land 1.1%;e ; north land i C t•enfliet :; :_ y fiev ub;;trucl inn 9 ) Natural rc;;uure•o;; : t_ t ____r 10 ) Ri:;k of up::et 1 ! ) I'u1)ulatiutt/Latltloymont : l. ) %uI..ber of Ovel 1 ings : I 13 ) Trip end:; ( tit ) : traffic i t.pae•t 14 ; F'tlit l i t• it ) t:, : 1 i t t e • w_ _ Vt. ) liwtan 17 7-.7 OUS r•1ut•F' Infortn.et ion n a c.i a by : i d l e ()7-iL fry Ag4iluEza OCT L9P1 W: S, 0 .0 - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 14, 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. THIRD FLOOR CONFEUENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS : Sea-Port Dozing, Inc. : ECF-587-80/B-236 Boeing Commercial Airplane Company: ECF-065-81/SM-92-81 NEW BUSINESS : ECF-092-81 INDUSTRIAL PARK COMPANY (JERRY IVY) SA-082-81/SM-94-81 Application for site approval to construct four tilt-up concrete buildings for lease consisting of office and warehouse uses in M-P zone and associated application for Substantial Develop- ment Permit; property located on the east side of West Valley Road approximately 1/4 mile north of S.W. 43rd Street and east of the Green River ECF-087-81 MacGREGOR, ROBERT STAFFORD R-079-81 Application from G-6000 to L-1 to allow use as' a carpet cleaning business with associated storage; property located in the vicinity of 194 S.W. 16th Street ECF-091-81 CARNER, GARY L. AND TOM R-081-81 Application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street ECF-013-81 HOMECRAFT LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. (THE TERRACE) SA-010-81 REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION CONCERNING TRAFFIC MITIGATION (see Wm. Snell letter of October 8, 1981) : Applica- tion for site approval to allow construction of . 280 dwelling unit multiple family complex; property located between N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street and west of Edmonds Ave. N.E. GARY AND TOM CARNER R-081-81 M f`1 Y 11 2pC.I U Es nr. Z23,-A.z ' 411) w 4urnpRDVeO AQfA Tgee 4 DRUt I r aa 1a C lfAf i 0 AIIA MASS C fax gviSr.1. C•MabAMD d BvdDlVb 3t•.1 are Dhw r Dove•M "A; PARK oih sr 1.o)O 1, 11.oe 01:o w 9RRcv e. wor 97)r IQ. k foie 160' 4.13.11'706fceMICT.•s}rli wievMkiTli33il! L3,11 T.A1TeMsec7ieP of 13t5E.. NE yZL I SCAIL It if' Si Dr u,lt 1.9 1.2IS mfPeLr.f D.Y0.WIL FLOORS & MORE COMPLETE INTERIOR REMODELING CARPETS VINYL COUNTER TOPS CABINETS 360E S.E. 128TH 455-6765 RENTON, WA. 98055 TO whom it may concern: The property located at 13606 s.e. 128th. old address, before being annexed into the city of Denton our new address is 4508 N.E. 4th, has a small business and has has small business ' at this location for several years. To name a few, General contractor 's xealestate Masonary Floor Installation, and now we have a Floorcovering store at the retail leval we have been open from march of 1980 at this location, vie (Thomas and Gary Garner) have purchased this property would like to expand our business but as the soneing is R 900 King county (high uensity) we cannot get a permit to do so until the zoneing is changed . Becaase this business and other business * have been in operation in this location for many years we do not feel that there will be any change in or impact on the area. Even with our expansion of 24* X 24 *. CJ ec e ,0;. G2?--17.4_44__ 7'; i SEP 29 1981 k MORE THAN A FLOOR STORE" FLOORS & MORE COMPLETE INTERIOR REMODELING CARPETS VINYL COUNTER TOPS CABINETS 13606 S.E. 128TH I 942554470,RENTON. WA. 95055 Q g w ; August 24, 1981 S ro whom it may concern: 4N1V1TVG5 Subject; Rezoning of property. Location ; 13606 0.E. 128th new address 4508 N.E. 4th. This property has just recently been annexed into the City of Renton therefore there have been no zoning applicati.::., made prior to this date. The area has been developing into commercial use over the past few years discription of the area will he;.p to E ..plain, At both intersection one at S.E. 128th and 138 S.E. there is a small shopimg center and a small gas station and store, and the other at Union Ave. and S.E. 128 there is a business park called Union square and there is four station (Gas) on the corne there is also a furniture store and a tarven just off Union Ave. on N.E. 4th, Accross the street from the subject property there is a New building for O.N.S. Renton hills branch. next to that there is a per* posed Fred Meyers shoping maul (25 aces) , and just off N.E. 4t h on Union Ave. there is a rick's resterant, See attached Drawing. Our retail store has been here over one and a half (1 ) years and and before our store was here there were several other business + at this location. we are located on a busy street (Cemetry road also known as S.E. 128 and now N.E. 4th. ) This street carries a large amount of traffic the area continues to develope. Our request fits in with the Renton Urban area Comppehensive plan as shown on there revised plan of January 1980. The property on both sides of tune subject site are single family homes we have talked to bo#h home owners and told them of our expantion and intent to try and change the zoning on the property the owner of the 2 FLOORS & MORE COMPLETE INTERIOR REMODELING CARPET. VINYL COUNTER TOPS CABINETS 13606 S.E. 128TH f 55-6765RENTON. WA. 98055 property to the west has a rental house there and would also like to, change- the zone to commercial, the property owner to the east are indifferent: to the subject. The reason f cr the request is we would like to increase the area of our store for more display area and much needed storage. It is not arm* a large addition just 24 t X241 (twenty four by twenty four) and we don t t fe'l this will have a big impact on anyone in the area but it will help us in our business. Sincerely 1 /•(iV ., MOBS THAN A MOON/TOI C CITY OF RENTON RE7O1E APPLICATION OF RENO \. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY A. AAIM LAND USE HEARING 1PPLICATION NO. Dl)/41 EXAMINER'S A 'TIOi U FY 2c3 1881 1.—)1 1PPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED 5 RECEIPT NO. CITY COUNCIL ACTI g', TILING DATE ORDr.VANCE NO. AND DAT4'4/NG nP,/ TEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : L . Name Tore And Gary Uarner Phone 271-i858 Address 3405 Talbot Rd. So. Renton, ':lash 98055 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on 128 th Ave. S.E. between Union ape :vo. and S.e. 138th. Square footage or acreage of property .488Acre 3 . Legal description of property (if more snace is required, attach a separate sheet) beginning. 150 feet west of the Joutheast corner cf the west Jt. of the, Southwest * of the Southeast 4 of the Southwest in section 10,, Township. 23 north,. Range 5 East, VIOL : thence North 290.4 feet: thence west 80 feet; thence south 290.4 feet; thence East 80 feet for paint of beginning; Except the South 42 feet- conveyed to King COu nty; situate in the Uounty of King , State. of Washington. Existing Zoning R-900 (High density) ?oninq Requested ahr nairAa1 j0TE Tn APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements. ) Submit this form in duplicate. Propos3d use of site FloorcQverinq Store at the Retail leval, 3. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. see Attabed sheet. pew sc'on after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? J . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 IT? OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM O ENT 4, A C\QED C. g 1981 Fl.FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application N o.C _//rf.•-•• 4 Environmental Checklist No. t- l5 9/-e/ N/PING PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date: EjDeclaration of Significance Ej Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent G,i c l/ L (i e r>V e.r 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 1 friD r / a /b o 7" l?cj S O, tl Tc't/ V, , f 7. 7f=/Ss , 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Ee z /v N/Z 1 uv- e a 5 ,Aa /l r- 7.1 , I s7are. L/ S O X p i' y 71, r` /ca l% . ` a • T Al A/A/ x i Ai 7d T 77 C' w_r Z v n/ Ay 1 C e— `/o o 1i ,v d r. - o u/ A.v 7 0 AA4 2 47 .2 qeJ ezfIdE:7'IaN 7ii/ 7 ' f r- o - • 5 {[/-e A/e av T (1Lei/v,-e °7~ ' P _2 DA/!z i G 7c L(.2 , rc«1 r 1 Ati",< yp% 7<, J t( 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : offal Ai/refs /f6" SE 1.Lfr'`, S ?f /v . o<<•, f-e" 7 O N Gt. (s u S s d AJ 5-/yeti. Ct VrC.yosc $ 7r ' PL(/ r3 v F r').N/3. Re N/[Oi( rrii/S /-71^r"N,4 s.sn !/ 5 i?i a J e.../ r c tiN er' ! fr 13 17- u:I lzr-,SL A r4 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : l 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected withLthis proposal? If yes , explain: 2 • / ej.l' J. J / . //d .Tait 1 To/ .1 i'd/'6:74,4 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: ry 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? v YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES MAYBE 3 d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES WITTE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , d/ either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel cf a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay , inlet or lake? YES MAYBE t Explanation: T J 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO _ b) The creation of objectionable odors? 1// YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO / c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? j/ YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to 1// temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?V YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 4) Mora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , 1,71 microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or v endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Tin- MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 1 I 4- 5 ) Fauna. +Jill the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO/ d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES- MAYBE N - Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO /+ b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? G YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? r/ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? v' Ten—FTTUr WO-- Explanation: 6- d; Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal ? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? vr- YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent:de37 wit d2 , A elA/ ^( name pr me City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand for additional housing? v YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE -7'N Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? 47/ 4 YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads?tt YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO il AFFIDAVIT I , h`A r tt .4-(7Divl A/44e. being duly sworn, declare that I am the ovGner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this6;7'?9 day of 19 O/ , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Q 4 z,cam.62 t , K ,e4 of Notary Public) Sign of Owner C(la - Address) / Address) City) State) Telephcne) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . se Date Received . 19 By: eYA Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 U,. log delta 'EFinancial Service HIS SPACE PRGviDED FOR RECORDER'S USE: FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF RFC OR(1ED 1 H1`, flA'' DELTA FINANCIAL SERVICES MAD Haft t ST JUN 10 1123 A 3 ' 1 rRANSAMERIC TITLE r : u CIWHENRECORDEDRETURNTO INSURANCE C.MPANY RECORDS & ELECTIONS lf)63S N. E.8th o,4 K Div `°C UN DELTA FINANCIAL, SERVICES LEvUB- LID WASH! ;MN 0 4311 N.E. SUNSET BOULEV \RI) i Lc) RENTQ:' .WASHING I ON 9 O55 KING COUNT1 le in 41056$ s EXCISE T;X PAID RECD F 6.00 1 JU1: ... Gr iTl 22' l CO E0640786 REAL ESTATE CONTRACT N.,..............-----/ j,, THIS CONTRACT,made and entered into this I S t day of May, 1981 betweert'*Austin L. Wolff and Harry S. Gamble dba Delta Financial Services, formerly Delta Construction - 1 ;** hereinafter called the"seller," and **Thomas G. Carner and Gary L. Carner** hereinafter called the "purchaser," i--"' NITNESSETH: That the seller agrees to sell to the Fu:chaser and the purchaser agrees to purchase from the seller the following f'' Kingndescribedrealestate, with the appurtenances, in 9 County, State of Washington: Beginning 150 feet W of the SE corner of WI of SWk of SE> of SW> of 10-23-5 C in King County, Washington; thence N 290.4 feet; thence W 80 feet; thence Q) S 290.4 feet; thence E 80 feet to point of beginning; EXCEPT S 42 feet there of conveyed to King County for road. 1 E htThetermsandconditionsofthiscontractareasfollows: The purchase price J.*.4Eiis"'•" 9 Y-Thousand and 00/100ths*** 4 I•.:* V**0,000.00%;*)•,.Dollars, of which Four-Thousand and 00/100ths*** S-•-•-•4,000.00*** ) Dollars have been paid,the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and the balance of said purchase price shall be paid as follows: s*Seven-Hund red Sixty and 00/100ths:;** S***760.00*** ) Dollars, or more at purchaser's option, on or before the first day of July 19 81 , and ***Seven-Hundred Sixty and 00/100ths*** Se•:•A760.00*** ) Dollars, or more at purchaser's option, on or before the f i rst day of each succeeding calendar month until the balance of said purchase pri:e shall have been fully paid. T.e purchaser further agrees to pay interest on the diminishing balance of said purchase price at the rate of twelve per cent per annum from the 1st day of May 19 81 , which interest shall be deducted from each hstallment payment and the balance of each payment applied in reduction of principal. All payments to be made hereunder shall be made at 4311 N.E. Sunset Boulevard, Renton, WA 98055 or at such other place as the seller may direct in writing. Monthly payments to be adjusted periodically to include 1/12th of the yearly real estate taxes and insurance premium. Prepayment penalty shall be at the same rate and similar terms as are contained in any underlying mortgage. Purchaser shall not sell or rent the property without cashing down to the underlying mortgage. If any installment is not paid within ten (10) days of date due, purchaser agrees to pay a late charge of five percent (5%) for each dollar overdue. Structural changes and additions to the property must be completed in a workmanlike manner within six (6) months of initiation. Purchaser further agrees to pay in full the entire amount of balance owing including all accrued interest five (5) years from the date of this contract. This real estate contract is not assumable. As referred to in this contract,"date of closing" shall be May 1 , 1 981 1) The purchaser assumes and agrees to pay before delinquency all taxes and assessments that may as between grantor and grantee hereafter become a lien on said real estate; and if by the terms of this contract the purchaser has a assumed payment pof any mortgage. contract or other encumbrance, or has assumed payment of or agreed torgurghese suatsject bto annye talc rand s aept.s nc wta Etna Iance. real estate,the purchaser agrees to pay the same before delinquency. v D P 2) The purchaser agrees, until the purchase price is fully paid, to keep the buildings now and hereafter placed on said real estate insured to the actual cash value thereof against loss or damage by both fire and windstorm in a company acceptable to the seller and for the seller's l nefit, as i interest max appear. and to.pay.all premiums and to deliver all policies and renewals thereof to the seller. o bbe paid by I e addedaa D ees t pection of said real cstat- ':__ ..-, i, her the Seiler nor his assigns shall be held to any so._:.;.... :L.,t.:c:_ _he of an" improvements theieoi, .:Or _ .ne 1 ser or seller or the assigns '•1 either he held to any covenant or agreement for ._..c._ ins, improvements or repairs unless u ovenant or agreement relied on is contained herein or is in writing and attached to and made part of this contract. 4) The purchaser assumes all I. _ards of damage to or destruction of improvements now on said real estate or hereafter placed thereon,and of the taking of said real estate or any part thereof for public use; and agrees that no such damage, destruction or taking shall constitute a failure of consideration. In case any part of said real estate is taken for public use, the portion of the condemnation award remaining after payment of reasonable expenses of procuring the same shall be paid to the seller and applied as payment on the purchase price herein unless the seller elects to allow the purchaser to apply all or a portion of such condemnation award to the rebuilding or restora- tion of any improticments damaged by such taking. In case of damage or destruction from a peril insured against, the proceeds of such insurance remaining of :.r payment of the reasonable expense of procuring the same shall be devoted to the restoration or rebuilding of such improvements within a reasonable time, unless purchaser elects that said proceeds shall be paid to the seller for application on the purchase price herein. 5) The seller has delivered, or agrees to deliver within 15 days o` the dn.te of closing, a purchaser's policy of title insurance in standard form., or a commitment therefor, issued by PIONEER NATIONAL I ITLE NSW,AN,F COMPANY , insuring the purchaser to the full.amount of said purchase price against loss or damage by reason of defect in seller's title to said real state as of the date of closing and containing no exceptions other than the following: a. Printed general exceptions appearing in said policy form; b. Liens or encumbrances which by the terms of this contract the purchaser is to assume, or as to which the conveyance hereunder is to be made subject; and c. Ar.7 existing contract or contracts under which seller is purchasing said real estate, and any mortgage or other obligation, which seller by this contract agrePs to pay, none of which for the purpose of this paragraph (5) shall be deemed defects in seller's title. 111 0 6) If seller's title to said real estate is subject to an existing contract or contracts under which Willer is purchasing said real estate, 0 or any mortgage or other obligation, which seller is to pay, seller agrees to make such payments in accordance with the terms thereof, and upon default, the purchaser shall have the right to make any payments necessary to remove the default, and any payments so made shall be applied to the payments next falling due the seller under this contract. Q 7) The seller agrees, upon receiving full payment of the purchase price and interest in the manner above specified, to execute and Q deliver to purchaser a statutory_warranty deed to said real estate, excepting any part thereof hereafter taken for public use, free of encumbrances except any that may attach after date of closing through any person other than the seller, and subject to the following: 8) Unless a different date is provides for herein, the purchaser shall be entitled to posscsslor. III ,;,,II real L>:.i:•- on date of closint and to retain possession Au lung as purLhaser is nut in default hereunder. The purchaser covcna:.ts .:, sc..p the Lu']Ld,ric An.; :trier hnur'cc ments on said real estate in good repair and not to permit waste and not to use, or permit the use of. the real estate for any illegal purpose. The purchaser covenants to pay all service,installation or construction charges for water, sewer, electricity, garbage or other utility services furnished to said real estate after the date purchaser is entitled to possession. 9) In case the purchaser fails to maize any payment herein provided or to maintain insurance, as herein req_•i-cd, the seller may make such payment or effect such insurance,and any amounts so paid by the seller, together with interest at the rate of 10% per annum thereon from date of payment until repaid, shall a repayable by purchaser on seller's demand, all without prejudice to any other right the seller might have by reason of such default. 10) Time is of the essence of this contract, and it is agreed that in case the purchaser shall fail to comply with or perform any condition or agreement hereof or to ma'.e any payment required hereunder promptly at the time and in the manner herein required, the seller may elect to declare all the purl•a_er's rights hereunder terminated, and upon his doing so, all payments made by the purchaser hereunder and all improvements placed upon the real estate shall be iorieited to the seller as liquidated damages, and the seller shall have right to re-enter and take possessit r of the teal estate; and no waive: by the seller of any default on the part of the purchaser shall be construed as a waiver of any subsequ nt default. Service upon purchaser of all demf.is,notices or other papers with respect to forfeiture and termination of purchaser's rights may be made by United States Mail, postage Ic-.-paid, return receipt requested, directed to the purchaser at his address last known to the seller. 11) Upon seller's election to bring suit to enforce any covenant of this contract, including suit to collect any payment required hereunder, the purchaser agrees to pay a reasonable sum as attorney's fees and all costs and expenses in connection with such suit, which sums shall be included in any judgment or decree entered in such suit. If the seller shall bring suit to procure an adjudication of the termination of the purchaser's rights hereunder. and judgment is so entered, the purchaser agrees to pay a reasonable sum as attorney's fees and all costs and expenses in connection with such suit, and also the reasonable cost of searching records to determine the condition of title at the date such suit is commenced, which sums shall be included in any judgment or decree entered in such suit. WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument as of the date first written above:, t Seal )1LG'7'1'i„/;' `Y1 f(/7 71,'? C L (Seal ) us in olff Thomas G. Corner Seal ) 0 'LLu t (seal ) r" M 14 ry . aflb'e . Gary t.. Carner S0'. 4 Seal ) STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. County of King On this day personally appeared before me Austin L. Wolff, Harry S. Gamble, Thomas G. Carner, and Gary L. Carner to me known to be the individual S described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this l St day of June , 1981 4--J, i l) , t Notary Public in aced o the State of Washington, Ren`[on residing at. 1. M hl CP v(6 1 Cp ESI,T 3 62) uulIIpRoVeo AREA TRce a aQwsN V a 4a 1a Stitt 1 CIeAm Aeea BASS t 1.13 it ExlsTrJ(. =e..rtrlrp.D ro BudDIv6- ry a i1[f k 1 arc L. DPVt w ; why 011, PAR K IN4 /et) 11Ac t Tot tItioe l Ot tRfve- a,1 wAr tbar.9 i,1_a' 111. to. O l.00f AA. 100' E93.1i'16 BkenuRT<r sF ne s,oevel ks 1103106 k. Z.3.21'Tey tetra SEcTieM of 13S`. nit aIL t• SG AI G it/0' Sior aaR 7 99.7IS' o.u0.wfl1 2 Die we.me . 1 z—,- , 6. 7,„.„,„ 4,....„ 1 i a H . I , r l f I L/tU1uhh1h1i5fIflLHH I 1 . 1 L ; 1 ji( i i - /lii I flYi 5 i HI 1 Hi , iii , i i is !iii i IIT,i , i 1 • I I i I r t l f i i , 1 I II it ii\.",,, ! *i. 1 I ii 'i 4 Tit f IA` 1 i I , ; L 4! „ 4 !,, , , ,t 1 Ali 1 ' 1 I 1 ; : ( ti f , • , , 1 1 , I t 1 L I1 } H j CA1eNEk Recto e • Srre PkR)! k). E. S`2- 0 8 1 - 8 1 OF RA,411. iv THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n a BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09. 0 co- 235- 2550 04TFD SEPIE P MEMORANDUM DATE: 29 Qctober 1981 TO: All Reviewing City Departments FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Carner Rezone, R-081-81 t,s-DRNESupplimentalInformationT T T The applicant is requesting a rezone of approximately half an acre to allow the expansion of his carpet business. The attached site plan shows the proposed immediate addition of 675 square feet. This will be used for storage. The design eliminates access to the rear; however, the applicant intends to remove the existing house and build new offices to the north of the proposed addition in the future. The septic tank system is intented to continue at the present time to provide sewage service. PLEASE RETURN COMMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE BY TUESDAY NOVEMBER 3RD AT 5 PM. 1 AktIKIIIL • i • 1 • 4. •.:t•• ' • ATTENTION MINPAilti BUIL 1;1:4G SEITSWKS FRONT YARD SIDE YARD ovlrfl i?‘ Rt. ;.::>..:; • •:?'. r't•••:•"•!IDPT'C 7istiVic 13 P C pos6 DEA )ST/ 4Dpitiop , c\I 3 5 I") Aor Now 7i C k . dojo -Mr I f._ 9SLA N S Nvk PCT021`1 Py Ill 3)' 1 ti .s/ fAx;„/". . 1A)Wirg:34x 0A ':/ A) r` l CITY OF RENTON receipt # PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME DATE PROJECT _OCATION 1.! r' `A `'rr` t4 " Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank vou. eceipt # CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME DATE PROJECT & LOCATION Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total ill Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank you. ENDING ' OF FILE FILE TITLE fi -OS \ VI