Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA81-094I BEGJINNIN‘x • OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED 0 •44,...8 ! OF R4,4/ Z. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTORp.IL O "MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-25409,0 co• NO SEP E O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: 1 January 14, 1986 TO: Files (All Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) and First City Equity Files) FROM: ! o er J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT:. DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 'B' OF SPRINGBROOK TECHNICAL CENTER The ERC conditions at the time of plat approval required the dedication and construction of Oakesdale Avenue (2 lanes) along the west side of Tract 'B' from S.W. Seventh Street to S.W. Grady Way prior to the development of Tract 'B'. Development of the parcels adjacent to Tract 'B' by First City Equities and Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) have been short ofj parking spaces on existing lots. In order to accommodate proposed parking, lot line adjustments have been approved In which a portion of Tract 'B' is added to the adjacent lots. These lot line adjustments for parking lot areas raised the question of whether Oakesdale needed to be constructed. On October 30. 1985, the ERC upon review of a new traffic analysis determined that "... parking lots can be constructed on Parcel B without the implementation of the condition to construct I Oakesdale Avenue. This interpretation does not include the construction of any buildings." Pow I'm de kaeri aiti Mires' RJB:JSM:ss PP' F0,8 r1 n,11 SFl• I-2s2, h 2156Z SR • 41.85 F FP llP•g MY) sn - s•Fs3kw') SA- • eh-g5 311.415-g 1 1-0-I41 im-o9- Fa SA-aLI- 'l Kai R.ol8r• 6. ROU I 3P.9i.g91 i Renton City Council November 8; 1982 Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA continued Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Approved CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Street Vacation Responding to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry regarding additional Information material for street vacation consent agenda items, City Clerk advised that maps and legal descriptions for all Council members will be furnished with the resolution upon transmittal to the Ways and Means Committee on November 15, 1982. OLD BUSINESS Utilities 1 Utilities Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Committee j recommending authorization for the City Attorney to proceed with dissolution of Water District #78 within the Talbot Hill Island Dissolution annexation as requested by King County. MOVED BY MATHEWS, of Water District SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION 78 OF THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. William Clarke Councilman Stredicke advised receipt of a communication from Complaint Water District #107 to the City Attorney indicating that the re Water district is not responsible nor liable for the William Clarke Runoff j storm runoff matter brought to the attention of the Council two weeks ago. He requested a report from the Administration of the status of the matter. It was reported that the referenced letter had been forwarded to Mr. Clarke and a meeting proposed to discuss the issue. Councilman Stredicke indicated concern that existing underground water jeopardizes maintenance of the roadway and the city may wish to mitigate the problem before serious damage occurs. CHG/Sunpoi'nte Citing a newspaper article regarding failure of CHG/Sunpointe Status Report Development to meet conditions of approval , Councilman Stredicke requested an updated status report on the project. Administrative Assistant Michael Parness reported steps have been taken to call the bond to assure conformance to additional requirements. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented a Development report recommending authorization by the City Council for the Committee Administration to proceed with the negotiation and execution of Holvick deRect an agreement providing for the funding of the construction of the Koerina j traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Construction Street. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR Funding j IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Agreement City Attorney Warren and Chairman Rockhill clarified specifics of S.W. 7th/ , the project which will require state bidding procedures, contribution Edwards from more than one source for funding, and be under city jurisdiction for signalization. CARRIED. Joint User Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented Driveways, a report recommending that the use of joint use driveways be approved for adjoining uses fronting on a street where combining access would reduce the total number of driveways onto the street. Except for such joint use driveways, it was recommended that parking as required by city code be provided upon property in the same ownership as the property on which the building or use requiring the specified parking is located. Referral to the Ways and Means Committee for drafting of appropriate legislation was also recommended. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances Committee for second and final reading: i:\\\ Renton City Council November 8, 1982 Page 4 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS continued Appropriation and An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer Transfer of Funds of funds of unanticipated revenue to be reimbursed to the city 8th St./Park Ave. by The Boeing Company, per agreement (CAG 049-82, 9/3/82) ; for Traffic Signal contract construction of upgrading the traffic signal system and Ordinance #3675 channelization on N. 8th Street and Park Avenue N. , in an amount not to exceed $46,000.00. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances for first reading: Ramac, Inc.An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain Rezone properties within the City of Renton from Residence District (R-1 ) R-017-82 to Business District (B-1 ) for Ramac, Inc. , File No. R-017-82, property located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) and the northbound ramp of 1-405. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Hardebeck An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Rezone certain properties within the City of Renton from Residence R-062-82 District (R-1 ) to Light Industry District (L-1 ) for Jerry Hardebeck, File No. R-062-82, property located in the vicinity of 412 S.W. 16th Street. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Planning Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Commission recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Mr. Robert Appointment Patterson to the Planning Commission to complete the term of Versie Vaupel who has resigned. Term to be effective through January 31 , 1985. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Voucher Approval Ways and Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers 42525 through 42736 in the amount of $890,464.89 having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services have been received or rendered. Vouchers 42520 through 42524 machine voided. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPROVAL OF THE VOUCHERS. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke requested an explanation of types of Topics for subject matters which can be discussed in public meetings and Discussion in which require discussion in executive session. City Attorney Executive Warren, described criteria used to determine whether a matter is Session/ public or confidential , noting that certain discussion regarding court Magistrate's case, Playtime v. Renton, Case Nos. C82-59M & C82-263M, would be Recommendation, allowed at an open meeting. Warren reiterated recommendation of Forbes Court Judge Philip K. Sweigert, .U.S. Magistrate, to prevent the city Case from enforcement of its Zoning Ordinance No. 3637 against the plaintiffs, Playtime, and denying the city's motion for summary judgment and renewed motion to dismiss based primarily upon protection of First Amendment rights of free speech of the plaintiff. The recommendation also alleged that through its Zoning Ordinance the city had forced location of the plaintiff's business in an undesirable and unattractive area of the city. Warren noted that a right of hearing remains open to the city if the Council wishes to pursue that option. The recommendation of the magistrate may either be accepted or rejected by the judge, and the right of hearing still remains open to the city. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT NOVEMBER 8, 1982 HOLVICK DEREGT KOERING CONSTRUCTION FUNDING AGREEMENT - SW SEVENTH STREET AND EDWARDS STREET (Referred 10/4/82) The Planning and Development Committee has considered the matter of the request of Holvick deRegt Koering for the establishment of a construction funding agreement between Holvick deRegt Koering and the City of Renton for the construction of the traffic signal at SW Seventh Street and Edwards Street. The Committee recommends that the City Council authorize the Administration to proceed with the negotiation and execution of an agreement providing for the funding of the construction of the traffic signal . JOINT USE DRIVEWAYS (Referred 10/4/82) The Planning and Development Committee has considered the matter of joint use driveways and recommends that the City Council approve the use of joint use driveways for adjoining uses fronting on a street where such joint use driveway reduces the total number of driveways entering the street. Except for such joint use driveway, the Committee recommends that parking as required by the City Code be provided upon property in the same ownership as the property on which the building or use requiring the specified parking is located. The Committee recommends that this matter be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for drafting of appropriate legislation. Ra dy o hill , Chairman 7 John Reed Robe Hughes r Renton City Council October 4, 1982 Page 2 1 CONSENT AGENDA continued Holvick deRegt Holvick deRegt Koering requested a Latecomers Agreement be Koerin established for the construction of the traffic signal at the intersection of SW Seventh Street and Edwards Street, pursuant Latecomers approval , Agreement to Hearing Examiner Report and Decision for site plan SA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and Ordinance 3622. Refer to Transportation Committee. Holvick deRe t Holvick deRegt Koering requested a Latecomers Agreement be W established for the construction of the traffic signal at the Latecomers intersection of Powell Avenue SW and SW Grady Way, pursuant to Agreement Hearing Examiner Report and- Decision for site plan approval , s SA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and Ordinance 3622. Refer to Transportation Committee. Cow Holvick deRegt Koering requested review by Council committee of Curb Cuts me requirements for common curb cuts as they apply to industrial Requirements and commercial sites. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Construction Holvick deRegt Koering requested a cnsrctionfiundingsingalgreement F , ;ng be established for the construction of the SW Agreement Seventh Street and Edwards Street. Refer to Planning and Develop- o--' ment Committee and City Attorney. J. Clifford Land Use Hearing Examinersubmittdsubmitted report onsinethe JW Cliffo12thrdeGray Gray Rezone Request for Rezone #R-051-82 of R-051-82 between Maple Avenue SW and Lind Avenue SW. Applicant seeks rezone from R-1 to L-1 to construct a warehouse. Refer to Ways and eans Committee. Planning Mayor Shinpoch announced reappointment of Virginia Houser to the Commission Planning Commission for a three-year term effective to June 30, Reappointment 1985. Mrs. Houser has served on the Commission since 1980. Other members of the Planning Commission include: Frank Jacobs, Eugene Ledbury, Michael Porter, Barbara Schellert, Joan Walker and Anita Warren. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. D. W. Bitney Appeal filed by Dean Bitney regarding Hearing Examiner Decision Rezone Appeal of 9/14/82 - D. W. Bitney Rezone, Variance and Preliminary Mobile R-023-82, Home Park Applications (Files No. R-023-82, PMH-029-82, V-041-82, - PMH-029-82 V-042-82, V-043-82, V-044-82). Applications requested rezoning V-041-82 of the west side of Union Avenue SE and adjacent to the southerly V-042-82 boundary of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Pak fromcon V-043-82 G-1 to T along with preliminary mobile home park approval v-044-82, struct a 203-lot mobile home park. Four variances from design criteria were sought. Refer to Planning and Development Committe( Donald E. Land Use Hearing Examiner submitted report on the Donal E.E. of Mc McWilliams Williams Preliminary Plat (File #PP-031-82) for app nal Preliminary nine-lot subdivieaoontoheleastcsnderoftUnionfAvenueeNE' betweensNEn Plat 1 .88 acres locat HearingExaminer PP-031-82 Fourth Street and NE Sixth Street (extended). recommendation: Approval with conditions. Council concur. Street Forward Finance Department requested resolution authorizing up to an Thrust Fund additional $500,000 being borrowed from the Street Forward Thrust Borrowing Fund. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BYC ROCKHILL, COUNCIL APPROVE THE Approved CONSENT AGENDA AS RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting October 4 , 1982 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President Pro tem, ROBERT J. HUGHES, COUNCIL MEMBERS RANDALL ROCKHILL, JOHN W. REED, NANCY L. MATHEWS, THOMAS W. TRIMM. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CLYMER BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY STAFF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; MICHAEL IN ATTENDANCE PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, Acting City Clerk; CAPT. DONALD PERSSON, Police Department. PRESS Jan Hinman, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1982 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the items included. Deleted item Mayor Shinpoch announced that item 5b had been withdrawn from the Consent Agenda. LID 320 Interim Finance Department recommended interim financing be provided from Financing the Waterworks Utility Fund for LID 320, water main extension on NE 27th Street just east of Edmonds Avenue NE (Devils Elbow Road) . Interest rate to be established at the prevailing rate at the time of the initial draw down; financing shall be repaid from Bond pro- ceeds after project completion. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Cumulative Finance Department requested an ordinance to establish a Cumulative Reserve Fund - Reserve Fund for deposit of Special Utility Connection Charges. Specitl Utility Monies received to be used for support and/or betterment of the Charges Water and Sewer Utility. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Shoreline Master Policy Development Department requested Public Hearing be set for Program Update October 25, 1982 to consider the Shoreline Master Program update. This program, originally adopted in 1976, is to provide specific development regulations for areas within 200 feet of Lake Washington the Cedar and Green Rivers and portions of Springbrook and May Creek Council concur. Unincorporated Policy Development Department requested review of City policy re- Territory Sewer garding sewer service to unincorporated territories within the city, Service specifically the "Liberty View" project. Refer to Utilities Committ Repeal of Finance Department/City Clerk requested repeal of Ordinance #3383. Ordinance #3383 Change in Federal law to Social Security reporting requirements removes present exemption of sick pay. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Handicapped Proclamation by Mayor Shinpoch declared the month of October, 1982, Parking Awareness as DAV Handicapped Parking Awareness Month, sponsored by Disabled Month American Veterans. Council concur. Claim before Legal Department requested ordinance be established requiring a Suit Ordinance Claim for Damages be filed prior to suit against the City. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. y - ‘ - RECEIVE® HOLVICK deREGT KOERING SEP 27 1982 CITY OF RENTON MAYOR'S OFFICE September 24, 1982 Mayor Barbara Shinpoch Renton City Council CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - TRAFFIC SIGNAL_ LATECOMERS AGREEMENT Dear Mayor Shinpoch & Council Members: Holvick deRegt Koering requests that a latecomers agreement be established between the City of Renton and Holvick deRegt Koering, for the construction of the traffic signal at the intersection of S.W. 7th Street and Edwareds Street. This request is made pursuant to the Report and Decision issued by the Office of the Land Use Hearing Examiner for the site plan approval, file #SA-094-81 and file #SA-095-81, and the City of Renton's Ordinance #3622. Respectfully submitted, HOLVICK deREGT KOERING ScY1747C:i1,...),,41. -1 Loren Davis Project Manager LD/jld cc: Frank Henry, HdK Dick Houghton, City of Renton Traffic Signal File - 7th & Edwards 1818 Westlake North, Suite 308, Seattle, WA 98109 284-9951 HOLVICK deREGT KOERING SAPS1CITYOFRENTON,MAYOR'S OFFI o September 24, 1982 Mayor Barbara Shinpoch Renton City Council CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - TRAFFIC SIGNAL LATECOMERS AGREEMENT Dear Mayor Shinpoch & Council Members: Holvick deRegt Koering requests that a latecomers agreement be established between the City of Renton and Holvick deRegt Koering, for the construction of the traffic signal at the intersection of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way. This request is made pursuant to the Report and Decision issued by the Office of the Land Use Hearing Examiner for the site plan approval, file #SA-094-81 and' file #SA-095-81, and the City of Renton's Ordinance #3622. Respectfully submitted, HOLVICK deREGT KOERING ra.e.z..7 Loren Davis Project Manager LD/jld cc: Frank Henry, HdK Dick Houghton, City of Renton Traffic Signal File - Grady & Powell 1818 Westlake North, Suite 308; Seattle, WA 98109 284-9951 w v RECENED HOLVICK deREGT KOERING SEP 27 1982 CITY OF REN T ON MAYOR'S OFFICESeptember24, 1982 Mayor Barbara Shinpoch Renton City Council CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - S.W. 7TH STREET & EDWARDS STREET CONSTRUCTION FUND AGREEMENT Dear Mayor Shinpoch & Council Members: Pursuant to the Office of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's Report and Decision for site plan approval, file #SA-094-81 and file #SA-095-81, Holvick deRegt Koering requests that a construction funding agreement be established between Holvick deRegt Koering and the City of Renton for the construction of the traffic signal at S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Street. Subsequent to the decision by the Office of the Land Use Hearing Examiner for the above referenced site plan approvals, the Renton Public Works Dept. has indicated that at the present time, the City of Renton has an existing controller and contributions of $25,200 for the above referenced traffic signal. In addition to these contributions, Holvick deRegt Koering is required to contribute 200 of the cost of the signal at S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Street. Holvick deRegt Koering requests that the agreement identify the existing equipment available for the signal, the amount of cash contributions already available for the signal and the additional cash contribution required to be funded by Holvick deRegt Koering. The',city council in acting on the appeal of the site plan approval, modified the hearing examiner's decision as follows. "The deferral of the improvements with appropriate bonding or the installation of signals will be accomplished prior to the issuance of occupancy permit." Holvick deRegt Koering anticipates that an occupancy permit could be requested within four to six months. Therefore, Holvick deRegt Koering request that the agreement be prepared in the most expeditious manner such that the bidding process required by the City of Renton, subsequent signing of the contract, and the required bond, can be completed prior to the request for an occupancy permit. Respectfully submitted, HOTK deREGT KOERING Loren Davis Project Manager cc: Frank Henry, HdK Dick Houghton, City of Renton Traffic Signal File - 7th & Edwards Renton City Council October 4, 1982 Page 2 3 CONSENT AGENDA continued Holvick deRegt Holvick deRegt Koering requested a Latecomers Agreement be Koering established for the construction of the traffic signal at the Latecomers intersection of SW Seventh Street and Edwards Street, pursuant Agreement to Hearing Examiner Report and Decision for site plan approval , SA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and Ordinance 3622. Refer to Transportation Committee. Holvick deRegt Holvick deRegt Koering requested a Latecomers Agreement be Koering established for. the construction of the traffic signal at the Latecomers intersection of Powell Avenue SW and SW Grady Way, pursuant to Agreement Hearing Examiner Report and Decision for site plan approval , SA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and Ordinance 3622. Refer to Transportation Committee. Common Holvick deRegt Koering requested review by Council committee of Curb Cuts requirements for common curb cuts as they apply to industrial Requirements and commercial sites. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Construction Holvick deRegt Koering requested a construction funding agreement Funding be established for the construction of the traffic signal at SW Agreement Seventh Street and Edwards Street. Refer to Planning and Develop- ment Committee and City Attorney. J. Clifford Land Use Hearing Examiner submitted report on the J. Clifford Gray Gray Rezone Request for Rezone #R-051-82 of the north side of SW 12th Street R-051-82 between Maple Avenue SW and Lind Avenue SW. Applicant seeks rezone from R-1 to L-1 to construct a warehouse. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Planning Mayor Shinpoch announced reappointment of Virginia Houser to the Commission ' Planning Commission for a three-year term effective to June 30, Reappointment 1985. Mrs. Houser has served on the Commission since 1980. Other members of the Planning Commission include: Frank Jacobs, Eugene Ledbury, Michael Porter, Barbara Schellert, Joan Walker and Anita Warren. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. D. W. Bitney Appeal filed by Dean Bitney regarding Hearing Examiner Decision Rezone Appeal of 9/14/82 - D. W. Bitney Rezone, Variance and Preliminary Mobile R-023-82 Home Park Applications (Files No. R-023-82, PMH-029-82, V-041-82, PMH-029-82 ' V-042-82, V-043-82, V-044-82). Applications requested rezoning V-041-82 of the west side of Union Avenue SE and adjacent to the southerly V-042-82 boundary of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park from V-043-82 G-1 to T along with preliminary mobile home park approval to con- V-o44-82 struct a 203-lot mobile home park. Four variances from design criteria were sought. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Donald E. Land Use Hearing Examiner submitted report on the Donald E. Mc McWilliams Williams Preliminary Plat (File #PP-031-82) for approval of a Preliminary nine-lot subdivision to allow construction of 18 dwelling units on Plat 1 .88 acres located on the east side of Union Avenue NE between NE PP-031-82 Fourth Street and NE Sixth Street (extended). Hearing Examiner recommendation: Approval with conditions. Council concur. Street Forward Finance Department requested resolution authorizing up to an Thrust Fund additional $500,000 being borrowed from the Street Forward Thrust Borrowing Fund. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL APPROVE THE Approved CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting October 4 , 1982 Municipal Building Monday, 8: 00 P.M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President Pro tem, ROBERT J. HUGHES, COUNCIL MEMBERS RANDALL ROCKHILL, JOHN W. REED, NANCY L. MATHEWS, THOMAS W. TRIMM. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CLYMER BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY STAFF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; MICHAEL IN ATTENDANCE PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, Acting City Clerk; CAPT. DONALD PERSSON, Police Department. PRESS Jan Hinman, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1982 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the items included. Deleted item Mayor Shinpoch announced that item 5b had been withdrawn from the Consent Agenda. LID 320 Interim Finance Department recommended interim financing be provided from Financing the Waterworks Utility Fund for LID 320, water main extension on NE 27th Street just east of Edmonds Avenue NE (Devils Elbow Road) . Interest rate to be established at the prevailing rate at the time of the initial draw down; financing shall be repaid from Bond pro- ceeds after project completion. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Cumulative Finance Department requested an ordinance to establish a Cumulative Reserve Fund - Reserve Fund for deposit of Special Utility Connection Charges. Specitl Utility Monies received to be used for support and/or betterment of the Charges Water and Sewer Utility. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Shoreline Master Policy Development Department requested Public Hearing be set for Program Update October 25, 1982 to consider the Shoreline Master Program update. This program, originally adopted in 1976, is to provide specific development regulations for areas within 200 feet of Lake Washington, the Cedar and Green Rivers and portions of Springbrook and May Creeks. Council concur. Unincorporated Policy Development Department requested review of City policy re- Territory Sewer garding sewer service to unincorporated territories within the city, Service specifically the "Liberty View" project. Refer to Utilities Committee. Repeal of Finance Department/City Clerk requested repeal of Ordinance #3383. Ordinance #3383 Change in Federal law to Social Security reporting requirements removes present exemption of sick pay. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Handicapped Proclamation by Mayor Shinpoch declared the month of October, 1982, Parking Awareness as DAV Handicapped Parking Awareness Month, sponsored by Disabled Month American Veterans. Council concur. Claim before Legal Department requested ordinance be established requiring a Suit Ordinance Claim for Damages be filed prior to suit against the City. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Renton City Council October 4, 1982 Page 5 NEW BUSINESS continued Common Councilman Rockhill asked if all Council Members had received Driveways a letter from Land Use Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman regarding common driveways. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, CORRESPONDENCE FROM MR. KAUFMAN REGARDING COMMON DRIVEWAYS BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch commended City Attorney Warren on his successful REPORT defense in the city's position of the Lakeview Towers case, noting this will reduce the liability of the City.; Government Mayor Shinpoch announced that she had watched the "Government Speaks Speaks" program on cable television and, while she believed the format could be improved, did appreciate Councilman Stredicke's contribution to the program. Police Mayor Shinpoch reported that she had received a letter thanking Department the City for providing such competent and qualified police officers. Commendation The letter came from a family (name not given) whose child had been molested and it sent thanks and gratitude to Renton. Police Detective Sheldon Ferguson for his sensitivity, professionalism and valued assistance during this ordeal . ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. 9: 15 P.M. MAXINE E. MOTOR, Acting City Clerk CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDER Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF October 4, 1982 COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN LOCATION REMARKS COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Thurs. 10/14 8:00 p.m. CLYMER Council Chambers To include Public Meeting regarding traffic situation near Valley General Hospital AVIATION TRIMM COMMUNITY SERVICES Tues. 10/12 4:30 p.m. REED 3rd Floor Conference Room Cedar River Terrace Pedestrian Corridor Tues. 10/19 4:30 p.m. 3rd Floor Conference Room Citizens Advisory Committee on the Block Grant Program PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Thurs. 10/07 4:00 p.m. ROCKHILL 6th Floor Conference Room Rancourt Appeal Thurs. 10/14 4:00 p.m. 6th Floor Conference Room Sign code and fee schedule Thurs. 10/21 4:00 p.m. 6th Floor Conference Room Bitney Appeal PUBLIC SAFETY lied. 10/06 4:45 p.m. HUGHES 6th Floor Conference Room Fire Department permit fees Wed. 10/13 4:00 p.m. 6th Floor Conference Room Second-hand firearm licensing TRANSPORTATION TRIMM UTILITIES Wed. . 10/06 4:00 p.m. MATHEWS 4th Floor Conference Room Sewer service to unincorporated areas Wed. 10/20. 4.00 p.m. 4th Floor Conference Room King County Solid Waste charges Proposed 1983 utility rate increases WAYS AND MEANS Ion. 10/11 7:00 p.m. STREDICKE 6th Floor Conference Room OTHER MEETINGS s EVENTS LEOFF Board Wed. 10/06 7:30 a.m. 6th Floor Conference Room 1 Suburban Mayors Wed. 10/06 Flame Restaurant, Kirkland, Washington ft RECEIVED ' HOLVICK deREGT KOERING SEP 27 198 CITY OF RENTON MAYOR'S OFFICE September 3, 1982 Mayor Barbara Shinpoch Renton City Council CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - COMMON DRIVEWAYS FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL USES Dear Mayor Shinpoch & Council Members: Holvick deRegt Koering requested that a variance be granted for common driveway access for its Washington Technical Center business park development in the City of Renton. That variance was granted during August of 1982. Similar variances have been granted for the Koll Industrial Park and the Sunset Park Shopping Center, files SA-269-78 and SA-104-80. Holvick deRegt Koering as a developer has experienced the advantage of providing common driveways to individual properties in several of its business/office park developments. By providing common driveway access, points of ingress/egress are limited along the street frontage; therefore, limiting points of turning movement and thus, eliminating traffic congestion along the public street. A reduction of points of ingress/egress encourages the development of onsite circulation which once again limits the congestion on the public streets. Holvick deRegt Koering requests that the appropriate committee from the City of Renton review the requirements for common curb cuts as they apply to industrial and commercial sites with the intent that; that committee could recommend the drafting of an ordinance that would allow common curb cuts when they are in the best interest of the city and would help alleviate congestion on the public streets. Holvick deRegt Koering thanks you for your review of this matter. Respectfully submitted, HOLVICK deREGT K----OERING oren Davis Project Manager LD/jld cc: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton Corresp. 1818 Westlake North, Suite 308; Seattle, WA 98109 284-9951 016 THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 czo g BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Co, Q FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 4tEpsEp10N® September 28. 1982 Members. Renton City Council.. . Renton, Washington RE: Common driveways. Dear: Members of Council : There have been a number of instances where the prohibition of a driveway within five feet of a property line works a hardship or. at least an inconvenience upon plans for unified development of more than one legal lot. See letter from Loren Davis, . Holvick deRegt Koering, received by City Council on September 27, 1982.) This is especially true in the development of shopping centers and industrial parks where shared driveway access is not only more convenient for the development but also safer for the general public. In such situations it may make sense to permit a shared driveway since doing do will eliminate unnecessary driveways. . The number of areas for conflicting turning movements would be limited. and enhanced traffic flow around these centers would generally result. The provision should probably not be eliminated on perimeter property lines where adjacent independent property could be adversely affected by an abutting driveway. As noted on the attached diagram, currently, if a common development is proposedforLotsB, C, D and E, driveways cannot be located on or within five feet of the dashed property lines nor on or within five feet of the heavy lines separating Lot A or Lot F from the proposed development. Since Lots A and F are not part of the proposed development and may be adversely affected by traffic entering or leaving the proposed development on Lots B. C. D and E, it is reasonable to require driveways to be at least five feet from these perimeter property lines. But imposing the same condition internal to the project is generally inappropriate. and therefore the Council should consider% modifying the requirement when unified development is proposed. If this office can be of further assistance in this matter, do not hesitate to call . Sincerely, Fred J. K fman Hearing Examiner cc: Mayor Shinpoch Mike Parness ATTACHMENT POSSIBLE SHOPPING CENTER OR INDUSTRIAL PARK CONFIGURATION ON LOTS B, C. D AND E, 1 AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES, LOTS A, F AND G. i t 1 I 1 1 1 MIMI jD 1E11 1 t 1 1 t 1 pOF RA, op .. o THE CITY OF RENTON ep®® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0 T6'0 SEP1 ktOP October 1, 1982 Mr. Loren Davis Holvick deRegt Koering 1818 Westlake North Seattle, WA 98109 Re: Appeal of Holvick deRegt Koering SA-094-81, SA-095-81 and V-014-82 Dear Mr. Davis: The Renton City Council , at its regular meeting of September 20, 1982, considered the Planning and Development Committee report concerning your appeal . The City Council affirmed the July 16, 1982 decision of the Hearing Examiner and found no error in fact or law. The Council also determined. not to consider any new evidence that could have been available at the time of the hearing before the Land Use Hearing Examiner. However, the Planning and Development Committee felt the requirement for installation of traffic signals prior to the issuance of the building permit pursuant to the site plan approval would not be feasible. The City Council concurred in the modification of Condition No. 2 of both site plans as follows: Condition No 2: Deferral of improvements with appropriate bond executions of contracts for installation of signals and issurance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and Southwest Seventh Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. Council has determined that, in order to obtain occupancy permit for this site, you must either obtain deferral of improvements with the appropriate bonding or have completed installation of signals pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. Mr. Loren. Davis Holvick deRegt Koering October 1, 1982 Page 2 If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor Acting City Clerk MEM:j km AMENDED PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT September 20, 1982 TO: Renton City Council FROM: ' Planning and Development Committee RE: Appeal by Holvick DeRegt Koering SA-094-81, SA-095-81 and VQ14-82 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of Holvick DeRegt Koering from the decision of the Hearing Examiner in the above mentioned matter dated July 15 and 16, 1982. Finding no error in the, requirement for installation .of traffic signals at ttie-intersection of Powell and Grady Way, and Hardie and S.W. 7th Street, as a condition of the site plan approval, the Committee recommends that the City Council affirm the decisions of the-Hearing Examiner. The appellant has requested that the Committee consider additional traffic study evidence from appellant' s consultant . However, the Committee finds that the evidence could have been available at the hearing before the Hearing Examiner upon timely request by the appellant. Therefore, the Committee recommends that no new evidence be considered by the Council . 1 However, it appears that the requirement ,for installation of traffic signals prior to issuance of the building permit pursuant to the site plan approval is not feasible.. Therefore, the Committee recommends that Conditions No. 2 of both site plan approval decisions be modified to read as follows : No . 2. Deferral of improvements with appropriate bond, executions of contracts for installation of signals and issuance of .a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and S .W. 701Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. c teig I is • Renton City Council September 13, 1982 Page 3 i AUDIENCE COMMENT continued Mandatory Ms. Taylor addressed the Council and reiterated her complaints Garbage Service as stated in her letter. Mayor Shinpoch explained that every continued I bidder on the city's garbage contract submitted their estimates based on all residences in the city and, in order to provide service to the citizens, all citizens must be included. M. L. Gibson, 1215 North 28th Place, agreed with Ms. Taylor's objections to mandatory garbage service and suggested unified demands by cities would require companies to submit "per residence" bids. Mayor Shinpoch explained reduced garbage rates and the addition of a one-can rate for those needing limited service. Holvick deReat Loren Davis, Holvick deRegt Koering, requested that the Planning Koering Ap eal and Development Committee report be advanced. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, 1 SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS SA 095-81 AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. V014-82 CARRIED. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill submitted a committee report recommending Council affirm the Hearing Examiner decisions of July 15 and 16, 1982, regarding installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way, and Hardy and SW Seventh Street as a condition of the site plan approval . The Committee also recommended that no new evidence be considered by the Council since all evidence could have been available at the hearing before the Hearing Examiner upon timely request by the appellant. The Committee did recommend that Condition 2 of both site plan approval decisions regarding require- ment for installation of traffic signals prior to issuance of the building permit be modified as follows: No. 2 Executions of contracts for installation of signals and issuance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for instal- lation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and SW Seventh Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATIONOF -THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT.** Councilman Reed questioned the lack of time restriction on actual installation of traffic lights. Following discussion, it was MOVED DY_BQC)H111,,_.ECONDED_BY REED, TO ACCEPT THE AMENDMENT OFFERED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY TO WIT: FOLLOWING "NO. 2" - THE DEFERRAL OF IMPROVEMENTS WITH APPROPRIATE BONDING OR THE INSTALLATION OF SIGNALS WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT._ CARRIED. **Original motion as amended: CARRIED. Garbage Pickup Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, commended the present garbage Commendation/ collection firm for its fees, neatness, quietness and observation Mandatory Leash of traffic flow on Mill Avenue South. Mr. Webb also criticized Law Enforcement the enforcement of the mandatory leash law and suggested repeal of the leash law if it is not to be enforced. Councilman Stredicke requested the record reflect that there had been a death of the animal control officer, and recommended strengthening the manpower to more than the current one animal control officer for next year' s budget.0 Mayor Shinpoch left Council Chambers at 10:00 p.m. and did not return for remainder of meeting. Mandatory Leash Karen Lunder, 506 Stevens Court NW, agreed with all comments re- Law Enforcement garding lack of enforcement of the mandatory leash law and suggestedadditionstotheanimalcontrolofficetosupplypersonnelformore than eight hours a day, weekdays only. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, SUBJECT MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR REPORT 1 BACK BY BUDGET TIME. CARRIED. Renton City Council September 13, 1982 Page 4 CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the items included. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, REMOVE ITEMS a, e AND o FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED (See action following Consent Agenda. ) Public Hearing Parks and Recreation/Housing and Community Development requested 1983 Housing and Public Hearing be set for 9/20/82 to solicit public input on the Community 1983 Block Grant Program for housing and community development Development Block needs. Input received will be studied by the 1983 Block Grant Grant Program Citizens Advisory Committee who will draft a recommendation on the 1983 Block Grant Program. The recommended program will then be presented to the Community Services Committee for study and recommendation to Council . Council concur and set public hearing date for 9/20/82. Telephone Finance Department requested enactment of a series of rate reduc- Utility Tax tions which will reduce telephone utility tax from 7.75% to 6% over a five-year period. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance and recommendation. Hold Harmless Fire Department submitted a Hold Harmless Agreement which would Agreement - allow testing of a 1950 Kenworth pumper owned by the City of Fire Department Seattle for 60 days with the option to purchase. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign agreement. Hazardous Fire Department requested that the Fire Department be designated Materials as Hazardous Materials Incident Command Agency for the City of Agency Renton in accordance with RCW•4.24. . Refer to City Attorney, Public Safety Committee and Ways and Means Committee. Metro Sewer Public Works Director recommended appointment of Robert Bergstrom, Technical Engineering Supervisor, as city representative and Donald Monaghan, Advisory Design Engineer, as alternate to the Metro Sewer Technical Advisory Committee Committee. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. LID 325 Public Works Department submitted documents for sewer easement Sewer Easement along westerly boundary of Valley General Hospital property in conjunction with LID 325. Authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute documents. Airport Capital Public Works Department/Airport requested adjustment of Capital Outlay Adjustments Outlay appropriations in 1982 budget to suit added project require- ments and actual project costs. Refer to Aviation Committee for approval of projects and Ways and Means Committee for resolution. Group W Cable Public Works Department submitted request from Group W Cable for Request for variance from existing undergrounding ordinance to allow them to Variance to rebuild existing overhead system throughout a major portion of Undergrounding their service area rather than underground the system. Refer to Ordinance Community Services Committee. Monroe NE and Public Works Department submitted agreement between City of Renton NE Second Access and King County relating to construction of access roads to Renton Road Agreement District Court, Renton Public Works facility and Department of Public Works consolidated facility (Monroe NE and NE Second Street) . Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution approving agreement and authorizing Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreement. Coulon Beach Parks Department recommended award of bid for Coulon Beach Park Park Signage Signage Contract to Gary Merlino Construction Company, Seattle, Bid Award for low bid in the amount of $22,795. Council concur in Park Board recommendation. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council August 27 , 1982 FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE : Appeal by Holvick DeRegt Koering SA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and V-114-82 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of Holvick DeRegt Koering from the decision of the Hearing Examiner in the above mentioned matter dated July 15 and 16 , 1982 . Finding no ,error in the requirement for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way , and Hardie and S .W. 7th Street , as a condition of the site plan approval , the Committee recommends that the City Council affirm the decisions of the Hearing Examiner . The appellant has requested that the Committee consider additional traffic study evidence from appellant ' s consultant . However, the Committee finds that the evidence could have been available at the hearing before the Hearing Examiner upon timely request by the appellant . Therefore, the Committee recommends that no new evidence be considered by the Council However , it appears that the requirement for installation of traffic signals. prior to issuance of the building permit pursuant to the site plan approval is not feasible . Therefore , the Committee recommends that Conditions No . 2 of both site plan approval decisions be modified to read as follows : No . 2 . •Executions of contracts for installation of signals and issuance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and S .W. 7th Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department . ir)))\) J t°- 31 4,--et-,Z 01' tlj` /,‘,&)/al 1\4vi Tv\kilr1, Renton City Council August 9, 1982 Page 2 Consent Agenda continued Garbage Request from Rainier Disposal to include a garbage collection information Collection sheet in the next monthly utility billing. This information sheet complies Information with ordinances and has the concurrence of the Public Works Director. Sheet Council concur. Block Party Request from residents of Dayton Court NE cul-de-sac to close off cul-de- Request sac on 8/21/82 from approximately 3:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m. for a block party. Refer to Police Department and Transportation Committee.•`•`*See item 3, page 3: Council approve this block party subject to the approval of the Police Department. Municipal Report from Mike Parness, Administrative Assistant, noted Municipal Court Court revenues for 1982 are anticipated to exceed budget estimate by approxi- Appropriation mately $80,000. Due to increased workload, an additional $11 ,500 has been requested to provide for overtime and operational costs for remainder of 1982. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for recommendation. Appeal - Appeal has been filed by Loren Davis of Holvick deRegt Koering of the Holvick Hearing Examiner' s Decision of 7/16/82 for approval with conditions of deRegt Koering site plan approval for construction of five one-story buildings to be SA 095-81 used as a business park or light warehousing; also requested a variance to permit joint access driveways on common property lines. SA o95-81/ V 014-82 (North side of Powell Avenue SW at SW Seventh Street) .Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Appeal - Appeal has been filed by Loren Davis of Holvick deRegt Koering of the Holvick Hearing Examiner' s Decision of 7/15/82 for approval with conditions of deRegt Koering site plan approval for construction of four one-story buildings to be SA 094-81 used as business park or light warehousing; also requested a variance to permit joint access driveways on common proeprty lines. SA 094-81/ V 014-82 (Southwest corner of Powell Avenue SW and SW Seventh Street) . Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Mike Mastro Report from Land Use Hearing Examiner regarding Mike Mastro (R.W. Poitras) R.W. Poitras) Final Plat, File FP-093-81 , stating appeal period for this recommendation Final Plat expired on 7/28/82 and the matter is now forwarded to Council for review. FP 093-81 Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. LID 314 Finance Department recommended acceptance of low bid for interim financing Interim of LID 314 (street improvements, sanitary sewers, water mains, fire hy- Financing drants and all associated improvements in the vicinity of SW 16th Street from Lind Avenue SW to East Valley Road and East Valley Road from SW 16th Street to SW 41st Street) in the amount of $4,886,538.56 from Peoples National Bank. Council concur and refer to Ways and Means Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS Approved PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Executive Council Presidnt session following this emeeti g r ntoddiscuss pending that Council legal uld meet in executive legal matters Session Pipeline Letter from Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. , JohnsonBraund Design. Group P.S. , Right-of-Way Inc. , requested review of existing use of City of Seattle pipeline right- Usage Review of-way between 304 Main Avenue South and Houser Way easterly to Mill Avenue South. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, THIS CORRESPONDENCE BE REFERRED TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE WITH A REMINDER OF THE CITY' S FISCAL SITUATION. CARRIED. Renton City Council August 9, 1982 Page 3 Correspondence and Current Business continued Second-hand Letter from Doug and Helen Beth Betts, Doug's Shooter's Supplies, Firearms 217 Wells Avenue South, and Holger Ingoldby, H&J Leather & Firearms, Licensing 224 Wells Avenue South, requested reconsideration of ordinance requiring two business licenses for second-hand firearms dealers and lack of en- forcement for other second-hand dealers. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, THIS CORRESPONDENCE BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Aviation Aviation Committee Chairman Trimm presented a committee report recommend- Committee ing Council approve the following priority order for Airport Capital 1983-88 Airport Improvement Projects (1983-88) : 1 . Water main - upgrading of southwest Capital Improve- corner. 2. Water main - completion of loop system. 3. Instrument ment Projects Landing System (ILS) . MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AVIATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Block Party Councilman Stredicke questioned whether the matter of the Dayton Court Approval NE cul-de-sac block party could be considered by the Transportation Committee and reported back to Council by the 8/21/82 party date. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, ITEM 6f ON THE CONSENT AGENDA BE RE- WORDED THAT COUNCIL APPROVES THIS BLOCK PARTY SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented committee Development report recommending the proposed revisions and amendments to the Zoning Committee and Other Land Development Codes regarding storage areas as submitted by Storage Area the Building, Zoning and Policy Development Departments be referred to Changes to the Ways and Means Committee for proper legislation. Recommended revisions Zoning/Other Land include clarifying the definition of 'bulk storage' uses, creating a defi- Development nition for 'outside storage' , providing screen and surfacing requirements Codes for 'outside storage' , correcting procedural discrepancies in the Bulk Storage Ordinance, amending the definition of 'parking lot' under Parking and Loading Ordinance, adopting a definition for 'storage lot' in the Parking and Loading Ordinance, and establishing screening and surfacing requirements in the Parking and Loading Ordinance for ' storage lots' . MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Zoning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill requested a public Subdivision meeting be set for 8/23/82 to obtain public input regarding revisions Filing Fee to the zoning and subdivision filing fees to more adequately reflect the Change City's true cost for providing this service. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES, SET PUBLIC MEETING ON 8/23/82 FOR PUBLIC INPUT ON THE MATTER OF INCREASED FEES. CARRIED. Councilman Rockhill noted that copies of the proposed fee changes would be available. Public Safety Public Safety Committee Chairman Hughes gave an informal committee report Committee stating that the matter of collecting delinquent parking fines had been Delinquent discussed with Chief of Police Wallis. Chief Wallis reported he has been Parking Fines using volunteers from the police college and the program has been pro- gressing well . He is also considering using officers on disability to help in this problem. Silent Witness Public Safety Committee Chairman Hughes also noted that the Silent Witness Program Program had been discussed with Chief Wallis. This program was started in 1972 as the Citizens' Council Against Crime and offers cash rewards to citizens providing information leading to the arrest of people involved in violent crime. Councilman Hughes explained that no Council action was required; this is informational only. For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # (Of AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk For Agenda Of August 9, 1982 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Maxine Motor Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Appeal' by Holvick deRegt Koering Consent File SA 094-81 Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach: New Business Study Session A. Appeal Other B. City Clerk's letter of 7/29/82 c. Hearing: Examiner's Decision of 7/15/82 Approval : Legal Dept. Yes_ No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer t0 Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A Planning and Development Committee Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary.) Appeal filed by Loren Davis of Holvick deRegt Koering - Hearing Examiner's Decision of 7/15/82 for approval with conditions of site plan approval for construction, of four one- story buildings to be utilized as business park or light warehousing. Also requested a variance to permit joint access driveways on common property lines. SA 094-81/V 014-82 Southwest corner of Powell Avenue SW and SW Seventh Street) PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. r// OF 40 o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 AA tp• O Q 9•' O SEP E July 29, 1982 APPEAL .FILED BY LOREN DAVI.S FOR HOLVI'CK deREGT KOERING Re: Holvick deRegt Koering - File No. SA-094-81 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title 4, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been fried with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $25.00. NOTICE' IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and .other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council 's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. Please' contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee and council meetings, should you desire to attend. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON f yam,12z.6-' Maxine E. Motor, Acting 'City Clerk MEM/ss OF I? y THE CITY OF RENTON o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 n rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 O P 9, 4TF0 SEP1E.° July 29, 1982 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss.. COUNTY OF KING MAXINE E. MOTOR, Acting City Clerk of the City Of Renton, being first duly sworn. on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States 'and a resident of the State'of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 29th day of July, 1982, at. the hour of 5:00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail , to all parties of record,:a true and correct NOTICE-OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION FILED BY LOREN DAVIS, REPRESENTATIVE FOR HOLVICK deREGT KOERING. SA-094-81 . Maxine E. Motor, Acting City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 29th day of July, 1982. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in King County ss CITY OF RENTON N? 23756 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHING/TON 98055 9 / 19 .. 2, RECEIVED OF //2./ c . 1:'- TOTAL J n C)O GWEN E. MARSHALL, FINANCE DIRECTOR BY / lz V 7 July 15, 1982 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION , APPLICANT: Holvick deRegt Koering FILE NO. SA-094-81 , V-014-82 LOCATION: Southwest corner of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval for construction of four (4) one-story buildings (Lots 12-15) to be utilized as a business park or for light warehousing. Also requested is a variance to permit joint access driveways on common property lines. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building & Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department report was received by the DEPARTMENT REPORT: Examiner on July 6, 1982. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building & Zoning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on July 13, 1982 at 11 : 15 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the Building and Zoning Department report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Building & Zoning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map of Phase I Referencing the variance request, the Examiner inquired if maneuvering space would be located on the access driveway rather than the property, and noted that perhaps since the applicant had created the lots on the property through final platting, he may have created his own hardship in the matter of variance justification. Mr. Blaylock advised that maneuvering space would occur half on and half off of the property. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding whether the final plat reflects restrictions imposed on the preliminary plat since the preliminary is dissolved upon acceptance of the final plat, Mr. Blaylock indicated his belief that restrictions are designated. Lengthy discussion then occurred regarding the timing and funding contribution towards traffic signalization at the intersection of S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. and the intersection of Powell and Grady. It was stated that the latter intersection will not be opened until signalization is provided; an ordinance does not exist establishing procedures for a latecomers fee for traffic-related problems; that participation from C.H.G. International and the Seventh Avenue Corporation as well as the applicant equal 60-65% of the total required for funding the 7th and Edwards signal ; the applicant could be issued site plan and building permit approval but could not receive an occupancy permit until the signal is completely funded; and the possibility exists that the remaining percentage of funding may not be available for as much as ten years. Responding to Condition No. 3 of the staff report, which requires covenants to assure site plan approval if the office space exceeds 23% of the total square footage in any future remodeling, the Examiner clarified that the Building Department would have authority upon review of building plans to establish appropriate parking requirements. The condition was subsequently deleted from the staff recommendation. Section M.4 was also corrected to denote a 20% instead of a 35% contribution to the signal improvements at 7th and Edwards with a 35% contribution specified at the intersection of Grady and Powell . SA-094-81 Page Two The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: 4 Loren Davis Holvick deRegt Koering 1818 Westlake N. , Suite 308 Seattle, WA 98109 The request for variance was discussed by Mr. Davis, who advised the purpose of the common driveways to encourage on-site circulation and limited ingress and egress into the project. He referenced previously approved variances , . i .e. Koll Industrial Park and Sunset Square shopping center, which established common curb cuts to mitigate traffic movements and encourage internal circulation using street arterials to travel from one building to another. Referencing Section 1 .5 of the report which denotes generation of approximately 1 ,640 daily vehicle trips , Mr. Davis advised a correction to 465 daily trips in calculating the total square footage of the proposed buildings which will reduce traffic impacts of the site. Addressing the matter of traffic signalization, Mr. Davis noted that surcharging permits have been issued for three of the buildings on the site, 12, 13 and 14, and it is the applicant's intent to construct those buildings and an additional building in a separate application over the next six to eight months. He recognized impacts and safety factors of the intersection of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way; however, he felt that traffic generated from the proposal will not significantly impact the intersection of Edwards and S.W. 7th, and hopefully, with the applicant's contribution, the city will be able to install that signal within the next six to eight months. The extension of Powell to Grady will be constructed under the applicant's contract for off-site improvements, and although the intersection cannot be opened, he nevertheless anticipated construction of 12, 13 and 14 and Building 3 of a subsequent site approval , and occupancy allowed, Prior to issuance of building permits on the other proposed buildings , he would provide an agreement with staff to construct the traffic signal at Powell and Grady which would allow the applicant to develop and occupy the first four buildings and work out other agreements at a later date. Responding to discussion regarding parking provisions, Mr. Davis indicated that the total site plan contains 30% office use which requires the highest number of parking spaces. He stated the desire to define the number of parking spaces needed for proposed buildings upon issuance of the occupancy permits . The Examiner noted that normally proposed use of the building is known at the site approval stage to allow determination of adequate parking needs. He also inquired if each building would be served by its own separate parking areas. Mr. Davis advised that parking is proposed around the perimeter of the site and parking on the front of the building on Building 15. It is the applicant's desire to substantiate the use of the building in defining the number of parking spaces required during issuance of the occupancy permit. Responding to Section L.7 of the staff report which notes that an irrigation system plan has not been submitted, Mr. Davis advised that submission would occur in the next few days. The Examiner requested final comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. SA-094-81 was closed at 11 :55 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The applicant, Holvick deRegt Koering, filed a request for site plan approval together with a request for variances to permit driveways to be less than five feet from property lines. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Building and Zoning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance 'and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a draft and final Environmental Impact Statement were prepared for the subject proposal . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject property is Lot No. 8 of the Earlington Technical Park Plat. The lot is level and any remaining vegetation, if any, consists of scrub brush, grass and weeds. 6. The subject site is zoned M-P (Manufacturing Park) and the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of manufacturing park uses. SA-094-81 Page Three 7. The applicant proposes constructing four buildings on the subject site. Since the applicant ,wants to maintain flexibility, the buildings have been designed to serve either office or light warehousing functions or a combination of both uses. 8. The total square footage of the buildings will be 46,400 square feet. The exact mix of uses would determine the required number of parking stalls. Office uses require one stall per 200 square feet, light industrial uses require one stall per 1 ,000 square feet, and warehousing requires one stall for each 1 ,500 square feet. The applicant has proposed providing 102 parking stalls to serve the buildings. Thirteen of those.stalls are located within an easement granted for a railroad spur line and the parking stalls would impair the utility of that easement. 9. The landscape plan submitted complies with the requirements of the reclassification granted, and the applicant has supplied the omitted irrigation plans. 10. The subject proposal will generate approximately 464 vehicle trips per day. Approximately 55 of those trips will occur during the p.m. peak hours. Traffic signals will be required at the intersection of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way. Monies for purchase of these signals are to be supplied from a fund contributed to by various developments in the vicinity of the subject site. At the present time there are insufficient funds to acquire the necessary signal equipment, and the city has recommended that the Powell Avenue extension to Grady Way not be opened at this time. The Police Department has indicated that the situation at S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. is critical . 11 . The applicant is required to contribute 35% to the Powell/Grady intersection and 20% fo the: 7th/Hardie intersection. The Building and Zoning Department has recommended that the applicant provide full funding for the signal with possible reimbursement through a latecomers agreement. The mechanism for creating the agreement is contained within Ordinance No. 3622. Since some funds have been received from other sources, the applicant would only be required to supply the remainder under the agreement. 12. The applicant proposed access to the subject property via a series of shared driveways with adjoining lots to limit turning movements from the various lots onto the public right of way. The shared driveways would be located south and west of the subject site. 13. Section 4-2204(2) (A) (1 ) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance prohibits shared driveways, and therefore a variance is required. 14. The adjoining lots upon which the shared driveway would abut will also require variances upon development. 15. The plat will serve either business office park uses or manufacturing park uses. The lots are generally large but there is insufficient frontage to meet the driveway separation 'distances of 330 feet when ownership is unified prescribed by Section 4-2204(2) (C) (1 ) . 16. The applicant proposes construction of only three of the four buildings (12, 13 and 14) on the subject site. Building 15 would be constructed at a later date. Pursuant to Section 4-3014(E) , the site plan approval is only valid for a two year period with one. year extension possible. 17. Similar variances have been granted to Koll Industrial Park and Sunset Square shopping center (Files SA-269-78 and SA-104-80) . 18. Some portions of the subject property may impact the flood control measures in the Green River Valley. The plat for Washington Technical Park has provided for certain flood control measures. The applicant will still have to provide flood storage capacity for any loss of the site's one hundred year flood storage capacity developed. This is required since the calculations for the P-1 Channel were possibly based on erroneous data as to the level of the one hundred year flood. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proposed site plan and the variance appear to serve the public use and interest. The construction of the buildings will permit the realization of the use of the subject site for manufacturing park uses in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan designation' for the area. 1 SA-094-81 Page Four 2. The site will be landscaped and the buildings constructed in the manner presented during the review of the rezone request. 3. While the applicant has not identified the specific use or purpose for the buildings , parking on the site will put limitations on the square footage which may be utilized for office and warehousing uses. The proposed 102 parking spaces less the thirteen spaces on the railroad easement will have to be reviewed in regard to the actual uses made of the property by the applicant or future owners. The nature of the use will , in fact, be determined by the amount of available parking, and the Building and Zoning Department will control uses when the occupancy permit is applied for or when a change of use is requested. 4. Manufacturing parks and land platted for such purposes have characteristics which create unique situations when it comes to access and -circulation. These generally large lots with very similar uses require special maneuvering areas which can best be served by common access over shared driveways rather than a multiplicity of driveways and curb cuts intersecting the existing right-of-way. 5. The shared driveways proposed will eliminate unnecessary driveways which in turn will create less conflicting turning movements onto and off of the public streets. This will enhance the public safety in the area. 6. Similar variances have been granted in industrial parks and subdivisions , and therefore the applicant has not been granted a special privilege. 7. Since the Fire Department requires dual access for each property, the two shared driveways proposed by the applicant is the minimum variance necessary. 8. Since the Police Department and the Traffic Engineer have determined that traffic signals will be required at the two critical intersections of Powell and Grady, and 7th and Hardie, the applicant will have to provide initial funding through a latecomers agreement to permit installation of those signals. While the amount of cost assessed to the applicant is less than one hundred percent, the record indicates that those signals are critical to the safe and efficient functioning of the city's traffic ways. The applicant will be increasing the amount of traffic which utilize these intersections , and therefore the installation appears to be warranted at this time, not just from this single subject proposal but from the other site approval submitted. The safety of these intersections should be accomplished now. 9. While the suggestion was made that Powell Avenue not be opened to Grady Way at this time, the Police Department has indicated that the situation at the 7th and Hardie intersection is critical and opening the Powell/Grady intersection could provide relief. That was the determination made both during the rezone hearing and the platting process. Therefore, that connection should be provided and a .latecomers agreement entered into by the applicant. DECISION: The site plan is approved subject to: 1 . Filing of the final plat of Washington Technical Center. 2. Installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and S.W. 7th Street. 3. Providing on-site storage of storm water equivalent to that lost by development of the site and not otherwise accommodated by dedications of land for that purpose. The variances are approved. ORDERED THIS 15th day of July, 1982. ehj". 1( 43.1.m- Fred J . Kauf n Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of July, 1982 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Loren Davis, Holvick deRegt Koering, 1818 Westlake N. , Suite 308, Seattle, WA 98109 SA-094-81 Page Five TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of July, 1982 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Don Persson, Police Department Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton, Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before July 29, .1982. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request 'shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor• of City Hall . HOLVICK deREGT KOERING July 29, 1982 N8313 AM The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch, Mayor CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: HOLVICK deREGT KOERING - FILE NO. SA-094-81 & SA-095-81 Dear Mayor Shinpoch: I am writing as representative for Holvick deRegt Koering, the applicant for the above referenced site approvals. Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3016 of the Renton City Code; Holvick deRegt Koering, appeals Examiner Kaufman's July 15 & 16, 1982, Report and Decision. The Examiner's decisions approves the above referenced sites, but requires the construction of two traffic signals as a requirement of that approval. The Examiner's Report and Decision requiring the installation of the two traffic signals, is primarily based upon only partial consideration of the record. Holvick deRegt Koering appeals the requirement of the installation of the traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way, and Hardie and S.W. 7th Street. The preliminary and final plat approvals included mitigating measures imposed upon the development by the Environmental Review Committee. Those mitigating measures included the following measures: Prior to the development of Phase I, the proponents shall: 1. Extend Powell Avenue to S.W. Grady Way. 2. Participate in the signalization of the intersection of Powell Avenue and S.W. Grady Way, by contributing 35% of the cost of this signalization. 3. Participate in the signalization of the intersection of Edwards Avenue, i.e. , Hardie Avenue) , and S.W. 7th Street, by contributing 20% of the cost of this signalization. The applicant is fully prepared to honor his commitment to extend Powell to Grady and provide funds for 35% of the Powell/Grady signal and 20% of the Hardie/S.W. 7th Street signal. ONE OAKMEAD TERRACE•1230 OAKMEAD PARKWAY,SUITE 210•SUNNYVALE,CALIFORNIA 94086-4069•(408)773-0111 Mayor Shinpoch July 29, 1982 Page. 2 The city staff had ample opportunity to require the installation of traffic signals during review and comment on the preliminary plat and final plat. Their decision and recommendation for the plat only required participation in the cost of the signal. Further, the memorandum of concurrence by the Environmental Review Committee for both site approvals, did not require the installation of the traffic signals. The Environmental Review Committee recommended that Powell Avenue not be open to Grady Way until signalization is completed. The Building and Zoning Department in their Department Recommendation, arbitrarily required the signalization of the intersection of Grady Way and Powell Avenue, in lieu of not opening the intersection until the signal was installed. Also, the Building and Zoning Department in their Department Recommendation, only required the applicant's payment of their 20% participation in the S.W. 7th and Edwards Avenue signal, in lieu of complete installation of the signal. Finally, no recommendation was made that an occupancy permit would be withheld if the signal at S.W. 7th and Edwards was not installed. Based on the above referenced statements, the applicant feels the Hearing Examiner errored in his decision of site approval SA-094-81 and SA-095-81. The applicant therefore, requests that the City Council modify the Examiner's decision #2 of site approval SA-094-81 and SA-095-81. The modification should require the applicant to make payment of 20% and 35% of the cost of the signal at Edwards Avenue and S.W. 7th Street, and Powell Avenue and Grady Way, respectively. Also, the modification should require the applicant to construct Powell.Avenue to Grady Way, but not open the intersection until such time as the traffic signal is constructed by the city. Very truly yours, HOLVICK deREGT KOERING da c Loren Davis LD/jld cc: Frank Henry, HdK ONE OAKMEAD TERRACE 1230 0 AD PARKWAY SUITE 210•SUNNYVALE,CA 94086- HOLVICK deREGT KOERING xNny D O H O H N ct C rs z r- 0 0 CD H I o 0 Z O cD a u,P v, Cn K 0 tr P3 ct fi r• 0 c) w 0 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J . Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 15th dayof July 82 19 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this `S day of 19 2 UV 01±11 Notary Public in and for t le tate of Washington, residing at Application, Petition or Case: Holvick deRegt Koering; SA-094-81 , V-014-82 The rnbutte.3 contain. a. .P,i.3t o6 the paJr,ti.ez o lrecond. ) T UILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE x EMRING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JULY 13, 1982 APPLICANT:, HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING FILE NUMBER: SA-094-81 /V-o14- 9a A. SIiqiii wy OF 'DUES': The applicant seeks Site Plan approval for construction of four (4) one-story buildings (12-15) to be used as a business park or for light warehousing. Also sought is a Variance to permit joint access driveways on common property lines. B. GENERAL INFO'+r,, TION 1 . Owner of Record: Holvick, deRegt & Koering 2. Applicant: Holvick, deRegt & Koering 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) Southwest corner of Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 3. 36 acres. 6. Access :Via S.W. 7th Street Powell Avenue S.W. 7. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufactur.ing;Park. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on July 2, 1982, and posted in, three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on July 2, 1982. C. HISTORY/4 ACKG a'UNYD: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No. 1745 of April 14 , 1959, and rezoned from "G" to M-P by Ordinance No. 3344 of August 17, 1979. PRELIMINARY REPO"'" TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT ;OERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE TWO D. PmYSICL EACKG;wuNIl. 1 . Topography: The subject site is basically level. 2. Soils : Woodinville Silt Loam (Wo) . Permeability is moderately slow. There is a seasonal highwater table at or near the surface. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard unless flood protection is provided. This soil is used for row crops, pasture and urban development. 3. Vegetation: The only vegetation on site consists of scrub brush, grass and weeds. 41 Wildlife: The existing vegetation may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject site (July 2, 1982) . 6, Land Use: The subject site was part •of a golf course but is being prepared for future office and warehousing uses. Similar uses are to the east of the subject site .while the property to the south and west is also being prepared for storage uses. The property to the north remains undeveloped. E. NEI, :=11•/;M OO T'ER]ISTICS The surrounding properties are a combination of warehousing, storage and office park uses. F. P',111 LIC SE.FRVI(CES: 1 . Water and Sewer: Twelve-inch water mains extend east-west on S.W. 7th Street and north-south on Powell Avenue S.W. with a ten-inch sanitary sewer also located on Powell Avenue S.W. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Not applicable. 4. Schools : Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICAELE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturing Park District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE CORD'N 2m2NSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OIFFIC]IAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 , Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June 1976 . 2. Policies Element, Comprehensive Plan (1981 ) . I. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR MIlwAN ENVIRONMENT:T: 1 . Natural Systems: Construction on the site will remove the vegetation, disturb the soils, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the vicinity. Through proper development controls and procedures, however, these impacts can be mitigated. PRELIMINARY REPORT HE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT & K( ENG, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE THREE 2. Population/Employment: Some increase in employment opportunities may be expected. 3. Schools : Not applicable. _ 4. Social: Minor. 5. Traffic : The proposed development will increase traffic in the vicinity by approximately 1 ,640 average daily trips . J. Ema ;41NMENTAL ASSESS T/'7EHRES 4I OLIID DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a Memorandum of Concurrence was issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee in January, 1982. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS- CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton' Building & Zoning Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6. City of Renton Policy Development .Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site and the present zoning of M-P, Manufacturing Park. 2. The proposal is . to construct four (4) buildings totaling 46 ,400 square feet on proposed Lot 8 of Washington Technical Center. The applicant proposes that up to 30% of the floor space will be utilized for office with 70% remaining for light industrial uses. The site plan as presented show parking along the perimeters of the lot adjacent to Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street with the loading areas contained, within a court yard. The proposal utilizes common access drives along the southern and western property lines. The applicant has applied for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (A) (1 ) which requires the driveways not be closer than. five (5) feet to any property line. Applying Section 4-722 (G) (3) it can be determined that the variance is warranted as follows : HARDSHIP: The first criteria requires that a hardship exists as a result of size, shape, topography, or location to surroundings. The size and shape of a lot created in a manufacturing park is a direct result of the industrial function and the market. In this specific case, a 300 x .400 lot is proposed and will consist of approximately 120, 000 square feet. This is a small to medium'sized industrial lot. Many of the 'new industrial lots farther to the south have buildings located 'on them which are 100, 000 to 200,000 square feet in size and the lots are 4+ acres in size. The function of any industrial PRELIMINARY REPO' TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT COERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE FOUR park is to maximum the coordination between adjoining internal uses. Section 4-2204 (2) (C) (1 ) states that there shall not be more than two driveways for each 330 feet of street frontage on property under unified ownership or control. This clearly shows an attempt to limit access. The applicant is proposing to limit access more by controlling and encouraging on-site circulation. Therefore, strict application of size and the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicant the original functional intent of an industrial park. MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL: Reducing the access points onto major streets would limit the potential points of conflict with traffic flowing on those streets and from a design point of View, it should be encouraged. In actuality, the proposal would ultimately reduce the curb cuts by 50% and would not create a detrimental impact upon the adjacent properties or general public. SPECIAL PRIVILEDGE: The Parking and Loading Ordinance specifically disallows the creation of a common curb cut; however, in the next section it specifically encourages, though indirectly, close consideration of curb cut locations. This consideration in the past has allowed the City in the case of Koll Industrial Park (Files SA-269-78 and FP-362-79) to allow a uniform cohesive development serviced by common curb cuts and access easements. In addition, the Sunset Square proposal (File SA-104-80) allowed joint use, parking and access easements for the development of a shopping center. This would suggest that in cases of coordinated, comprehensively planned commercial or industrial facilities that a variance should not be considered a special priviledge. It would be considered a functional necessity and a reasonable decision. In some cases, the buildings were originally designed to function independently but based upon the market and eventual sales of the property, the buildings function together as an industrial complex. This is the present case of the Benaroya portion of Glacier Park Development along S.W. 43rd Street. In that particular case, curb cuts have been eliminated, security fences installed and access limited to common driveways and gatehouses. MINIMUM NECESSARY VARIANCE: The applicant' s proposal. would reduce the number of curb cuts by 50%. The variance request is the minimum necessary to allow this reduction to happen. However, each site plan review should consider the functional acceptability of placing a common curb cut on a property line. In the case of the western property line, the thirty (30) feet utility and access easement is actually reserved to allow future rail access to the site. Allowing a curb cut at this location would appear to conflict with that ultimate intent. PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT & K .ING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE FIVE The Building Division advises that other parking variances maybe necessary as a result of the statements that all parking must be on-premise parking. A parking space does not function by itself. Necessary access aisles must be provided. In the case of sharing a common curb cut, access is then joint and provisions for joint access easements should be provided. Granting of the curb cut variance along with the requirement to provide joint access easements shouldibe sufficient to address this issue. 3. ! The primary natural issue accompanying the development of this entire site has been the question of present and future flood water storage. The prelimary plat required dedication of sufficient area to • construct the fore-bay for the P-1 .Channel together with the Environmental Review Committee' s decision Ito require the applicant to construct sufficient storage to mitigate any filling of the subject site. This primary issue appears to have been resolved. However, final resolution will not occur until the final plat is recorded and the property is transferred to the City of Renton. Therefore, any site approval should be conditioned upon filing of the final plat. 4. ! A secondary major issue surrounding the development of the subject 'site has been traffic generation. 1The Manufacturing Park Zone would allow all types Iof development ranging from light industrial through all office. Surprisingly, the heaviest anticipated use would be the light warehousingiaccording to the ITE manual generating 50 trips per 1 ,000 square feet. The EIS prepared suggests a maximum of 30% office over the entire development which would anticipate that one complex may be all office and another complex might be all industrial. IIn any case; the focus comes back to the two "choke points" that limit access to the general area. The Environmental Review Committee specifically included participation in the traffic signals at 1S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. in the amount of 20% and improvements in the intersection of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way in the amount of• 35% with the additional requirement that the developer construct the extension of S.W. Powell Avenue. The Enviromental Review Committee in issuing the Memorandum of Concurrence for the site approval stated clearly that "the intersection of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way will be unsafe until the intersection is signalized. Therefore, Powell Avenue can not be open to Grady Way until the signalization is completed to City standards. " This is a simple statement which is not a requirement of the Environmental Review Committee. Even though the initial two site approvals probably would not generate sufficient traffic levels to warrent the installation of the traffic signal, it seems inconsistent to require that Powell Avenue be extended prior to the development of Phase 1 , but not be open for public use. The matter could be resolved by requiring the applicant to install the traffic signal and then have him seek a latecomer' s agreement from adjacent developments. 1 1 PRELIMINARY REPC' "'. TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT ' 2,OERING, SA-094-81 y , JULY 13, 1982 PAGE SIX In the case of the intersection at S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. , those improvements are presently included in the bond which the applicant has submitted to allow filing of the final plat. However, a bond is a very tenuous instrument to proceed against and the cash should be available • to allow the City to develop that intersection at this time. The City has currently designed the revisions for that intersection and has other property owners within the general area committed to proportionate shares in that signalization cost. 51 The applicant has provided 102 parking spaces for the subject. site. The 46 ,404 square feet of building space (30% office and 70% warehousing) would require exactly 102 parking spaces. However, the 13 spaces provided on: the west side of Building No. 15 cannot be considered permanent because they are adjacent to an access easement which would provide for future rail extension to the plat. Elimination of these 13 spaces would reduce permanent parking to 89 spaces and reduce the maximum a-llowable office development within these four builgings to 23% Of the total volume or 10, 675 square ,feet. To assure that no more than 23% of the building floor area can be developed for office{ restrictive covenants • should be filed limiting total office space on Lot 8 to require a new site plan approval if the 10; 600 square feet of office- space` is exceeded. Primary intent of the restrictive covenants is to notify any future owner that there is a limitation on development on the site unless there is additional City review. It should be pointed out that at some point the buildings may become all office in nature and there may be sufficient area if the interior court designated for loading area was redeveloped into parking lots. 6. The Fire Department advises that all fire hydrants should be installed prior to construction. 7. The landscaping plan meets the• intent of the original presentations for the preliminary plat, but lack an irrigation system required .by City code. M. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the variance request, V-014-82, be approved subject to the condition that joint access easements be filed on all affected property lines as they are approved by the Hearing Examiner after site plan approval. Approval of the site plan request, -SA-094-81 ,. subject to the following: 1 . Filing of the final plat for Washington Technical Center. 2. Signalization of the intersection of S.W. Grady and Powell Avenue S.W. prior to occupancy. 3. Filing of restrictive covenants requiring site plan approval at the time office space exceeds 23% of the total 46 ,404 square foot building area or 10, 675 square feet. • 4. Require payment of participation (35%) in signal improvements to S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. within 60 days after issuance of building permits. rkiif14. t 17 Pi. R 4101, „ .,.,. 4,044e4...40-44 ' A 1II/ 1 1 feati i• VO-4 . f' jegip, I Xi ID ‘ktr• UP. E 0.4 • ,,,,, , ft-, 4111. rATI • 4 's'' l'ett F117"10207 pt-, .zit_ • 4: . t.. -% ..„, WCZ ph alti kiza,/co weityi‘v •- 4 :Petit. --* gilt, ik, QIPAINiti„g*4 c, 44u4T41, • 4' el ll; qw 6' '41101-.c.,,-- .- - 4...t:I•41?ft.t -'itf, i 4ciftkr. Aireg fik b.'' 1 ILP, 4 37 A i it] 4 4' i Lied lir ty . R-1 4.1b14---- -a--- 1 54154‘ 1 44 I i KCV%1 11,.., :-..; ______L. _ ... _ ..- - — ATM ___ ___---- 1 , Val S.V./• rtt I i I s s J.../--- k \ c-•',, i •:c: • .)La 5 N 0 •:-.70,IN i i_ __ __.. . ...... _ .. ..,,, Ill 1 AY ••---.-•-- -- - '.' •, L, 7 4, Li tn i Li ' v 4 0 c." IV:N v. •r. :ift 1•.:. v...., .• ...1 1•••••, ..,::,"1 .1-%10'a ,v i %. 1 r...1 . .- 7\" 4..).- HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING SA-094-81 BUILDINGS 12 , 13 , 14 & 15 WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER APPLICANT Holvick , deRegt & Koering TOTAL AREA f 3 . 36 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Powell Ave . S . W . & S . W . 7th Street 1 EXISTING ZONING M-P , Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Vacant/Golf Course PROPOSED USE Industrial Park COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS r al2iI RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Ai-plication :57--stI.E- s9prRotim, .._Reg ±eif A1 63i't-1,1: 64-,4_1417100itiehlo.h___?_40_0_444.4..46011firSitl.% rk 4r'4'oe AI tit Lccation:S/Vdbriter_et Sici 7 in.syt fr 12440.'if ; ig.,,,r4i N.pl i can t : reerirmi_ alwe. k de Ali 10 :0 Public ks Department ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:]4 DT affic Eng, Division SCHEDULED HEARING DAIE: """'_ OUti iities Eng. Division aFire Depa r tmelit. Li Parks Department 0 tiui1ding Department 0 Poi ice Department 0Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGEST IONS REGARD 1 :•:G ' `.II:1 S APP MCAT ION SHOULD BE PI;OV T.DED IN 1`r:ITING. PLEASE PROVIDE CMIENTS TO '.1'HL: PLANNING DEPARTMMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. i:1:\'1E'o;1NG DE'PARTMI NP/DIVISION : Approved % Approved with Conditions El Not Approved ti l/ 'i c S -&J e- A0 / dvaI GrC L e p c•2 6-e ik-s /4" 4 eh- e CC— tS4 i_ev.— CLGC S '%-. d g 4 vi . dr. erecii i c / SA-bJ J DATE: /Z 2 Ve/ i gna ti.re of Dire Jr or Auth r•i ze Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: c- ire _ a, i, DApproved Eripproved with Conditions 0 Not Approved Or? S,'/' ,`,r e 44 /07 l1 Q.// /0 tJ c' `o v/,lee/ cd- J' t 4/>-, 11-litr/ r0 g C .e e dept. a C C e 5 5 k ,6 e ,Div v/lei Q I 1;n e D cm cons i l l sue._ DATE: 42"v?/- F. / Signature of Director or Authorized Repre_ n tive OF 1 A. ty. THE CITY OF RENTON U to Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR POLICE DEPARTMENT 42• HUGH R.DARBY, CHIEF o P , 9RTE0 SEPSOO CISY OF RENnOH k-t% MEMORANDU DEC 3 019g1 TO: The Environmental Review Committee FROM: Lieutenant D. R. Persson BLfII.I1 G A RE: Springbrook Technical Center After reviewing both applications for site approval in the Springbrook Technical Center, I find that both requests will have a substantial impact on the Renton Police Department's operation. As I am sure you are aware, the Renton Police Department requested six additional officers for 1982. This amount of officers was necessary to meet the increasing demands placed upon the police department by the general public. The six positions were denied in the 1982 budget, which means that we cannot continue to offer the same level of service to the citizens of Renton if building is allowed to continue without additional help for the police department. Naturally the impacts that a development such as this will place on the department can be mitigated to some extent by proper building methods. These methods include but are not limited to such things as proper placement of outside lighting; burglar alarm systems; security windows, doors, and locks. Another major concern of this development is the traffic that will be generated. At the`present time we have a traffic situation at Southwest 7th and Hardie that is unbelievable. Everyone agrees that a traffic signal is necessary at ' this intersection, however, the signal and funds for the signal do not appear to be present or even available in the immediate future. This development will further impact this particular intersection as well as the intersections of 7th and Lind, 10th and Lind, Lind and Grady Way, as those intersections will be the major access points to the new development. Therefore, it; is my suggestion that this development not be allowed, until : 1) There is a signal at 7th and Hardie. 2) Powell Avenue Southwest be completed all the way through to Grady Way, and the intersection at Grady Way and Powell be signalized. 3) The intersection at Lind and Grady Way be improved; some fairly inexpensive improvements at the intersection of Lind and Grady can be accomplished which would greatly enhance the traffic flow on a short term basis. Because of the above reasons, I strongly urge a declaration of significance be issued on this project. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e- Bcb G Wpprove DApproved with Conditions ID Not Approved DATE: 12 ZZ—z? ISireofDirectororArt )ori zed Reprecon to ti ve j / S 1 a s rt OP CPN.1wuC11CN- 7 I I I j JP11.11" "I•. ' 111 r MI 1 • z•H IH H I d 1. i e1 IC Eigic 1 _ 1 I F c t l. 17 ( I /Eno.OP 201,11. 32 rt 6—I.. Ti 11 n EMS Z , i 0 V L 41C I N.,24.._,0. I.. 013 1.floe r'^" Sao,.pateit repot.for all ow...era. na,Nccrovatible slie>i i \:.•f; r' r p100 J li CS ianourish u 0 tor I-%IT.!''`' t 9106E" WTI Soiwi.systems Pall,ram tos etch onsns A• ,\=e ems„w e.n... . w o-.,..e.,,ta, Et 11, 1* Ill.(NTOWN,‘.. _:. .,:.'";..." . I-, 4,::.f.'\'..,-:::: 11ii,„`„ I h'. sd11i,IAYII Q\\:gr ! 1\ sxe o:1n"°.:.°t`.'"mow o e ...- Gs•CCC a z b, -,.::: aa+ n, ,.n,na.RENTON w....,.e. ,,,el ,.,>«ebe VICWpry MAP mono "` p`t.w n A,.w„a wa prior to Woo b.,during t.first 48 nours or cur.. S. I.Contractor Pall call Pa st.tural peineer for ti. not.Ivo.hltett.otke no repo.',that his approval. 1 e— r. on.ee w,wee. d .. OHotoo-tottottott•too.or ot too. O,w, xone preen of SW tart orgy.all Noe,Enrol.,and ig1electricalI.otter pen.except tolleIng w.I,a..,1.,.ry..... ,. N J i i•eraI' - YY BITE PLAN - (wn»As Is..ww..w e,TO n-w. SA-094-81 CAL.. Y p V-014-82 i4 1 LF4 if il1, i Pr Eby KW/....AN J\„,__,..,...7- _."1__ C..w.t rave h.W. 6EVEHTF4 AVE uowt.o. tma a.w—....-- I~- - k i»• f- -- •— ' a CCl'ilm PORTION OF TNT ICOTNIAST MATZO OP mulON II S.T.NONTNEAST QUARTER OF SECTION w coon.•a.iwwoo. o[iw e[o.[ RtwT r 1KN Ns.y i 14s PAO.TIE VEST li.Of iw iiv i S TNN w..... p' 4 n 111 SAID LINE MTN na o,a.,,[[[, x[ w[ F } . u ra II 1' ®M I I I J • POINT c 820111.1011. s x t x t _ . U.N, INALDIN6•I2 c„Zr, yWILDING'1, II\ E I]I. au n,a..K-... 1 Ii. a i.a.,..a[.a-[ i.°r[a..T VII.°SWIM K2 PLO NUSS i..n ''i— - "•. .S - ---a•-------a.,F, - 3 r"'u[o,':-':'.[` mrrm.. ia.SW ar. s sw.,o.) OGURg fJE1AIL I -a- trii y ` :^ _ 1' II I `r W 11: ua.c,t L,,lo 1. s uni[n.o a1 O+ b 'y r.L. } m °'14' .c_.,. ia.,a.•v L wK: [ mom•,.wY"ea,,, i• 1 fisisa y i+.1.':1 S :: o:.utor°w.s,n....[[. "Y' :• :,N5,,.fY `" R. _ ' a Q uACT.u.o . o.<a+.la rc.ru.v uHq,,,swsf. Ott- A.1M1 I, ..x s dlILDING F4 [.... 4 IIZ 0 i CS I .... t 1Lis, ..... I,_fi ` j i {i 1 , JILDING+16 II.'I 1 11 1 dibao t • I a. Flu a e al ( ._e il . aCJ n' __- - n>.e•_-.._.. 1ir{w'j'___ ev.4•_- ,io ie' Ia' Tn_ 10 ttt--- r L4[ W[CICr.IT1flkIIII LSA-094-81SITe PLAN - 1JLDG.S +12-15• V014-82 i_mt."7"...4‘•-•-•"' F":. T7 1II- • - ' 27vr-...--:-..,,. i.---'- 1'4.•r...1)''''''''' EAST ELEVATION NORTH e 1,t VAST I ONTT...-. n•••• r It, 1,-„.. . .. •,!.•:„. • . . ' r•.,:.1. . • . .. ' E;.4.: . , • .. . ir-il.l. .. •. . r•••..wrirOP. i ••••••. •i.1.- '. 1 46,--gr-1.-• 1 L I_ . .. . .1 . I I I : • 41sy Tmero ...UM.au..i•I...M.,ha,onarrorres gr•rnre. Twirer...a's, zr.,.....?7,.....4... WET ELEVATION TH ELEVATION..,........... 0• o W aI17'1-',— 1 . U 1 1oJ /\ ... 1,: oU a 2-. o 0 w 1- i 2 g 8o Cc, M Or O' 4; . — a a I 19-41*- .1 I 1Ii .i, IrAft 1 : ts. , ini -t 3 .. •0 - - . I- ' ,,.. "(1 , )_ It:. 11 I.•t .4. •:. ci'''' u•..—r.n.a.% ...i&t.u. ) ....., \ ........,, if I4_.._ .... . J •irlr...---72fr...-....3,--" -4.- 1 e L6 SA-094-81 e I ...-••• , 0 1V7014-82 • 1) FLOOR..PLAN 112 II NUM& 15 1 3 a,1, 1-------4 t- I 7„.:...„...„ i___ • • •-1 1 L-.-•• •-•-•-}-:; ----.7I- •H•-- ., ... .- ..• • 'Fr. . . r-- .--.• T.:• . .. -,----,r:---.4--.....:71-:=•,,,,,,--• - i -----'=. , 1....-.1,... ....!-•"'—`"--"-- 1.... pi, 1 J.......... ....-...............,.._. ..4, EAST ELEVATION Z",:..7-E...7"."4"4.:1.."..4,'1.'".1,-4 '6'" ' -NORTH ELEVATION 1;:i1.nt;-$.5-- 1--i L-2 . • . „.--. 1 t v.,.IA h....., • Fl ri _- WEST E L VAT I.0 N OUT H eL.eVAT ION iI 1- 4. .. • 7.tli__I-- ". _3t4:".'4., I 4...,- A! ::.f o . .t 1 . . s-. 1.1, _ o . • 0—,i, T.• 1 0 ...,,_ _ T - I 111.I_L, r_LF-\....__._::._.c.._._...., ___,,,, -;-1 ' -1.]::, 1 ItI i 1 ILL 11 a •••• .. t ' ii III 7„-I-- t''..::. 4 •, l ' X g i 0 riCOW. 0 1 el 1 11•0( -...\. 0 I .‘ 1 4, I:21 i 11i1 A 0 1 1 i 1 i Iit y 4444 44. ---74 ----, -'•••s- 4 0 1 " tr.4. ''4,•1 ed-4. [ so,c... Z •I .44,4.• 1,_a. I .,.• ti i i o SA-094781 . II IV-01.4-'82 CD i. ii 0 ED FLOOR PLAN A BLDG: in 3 is rele141.1713:'''"•"'''''"'-. ,_ _ _ ,,,....-=3.•,• __...‘ we....• „. 7-- --.,I 1 1,:;.=:__,,::::_____________,.._ I4-------,c• dd .: t 1 7---.---------,..„-d--.--,_:_„_tt:„. --.! t t —•—, ........ . I. . . 1-<<.• . --"......f."7"'a j:) ....,:i;.....4.t6o. ="7-*11Vere••• . . r..C....T....O.)) ... . . d i.,__,1-.._h 0 tI:0. _..-,1rtI• W'eST e Le VATIoN J=-1 t, ar 1 i 1, .1114.' r•----" 3 ..5 I i 0 1 1 • All.*.l. I . • 1 il i• -?I Lon NA-110so -i EN i I 1 " 1:1"'' t, - I 1C 0...... ..... I I at. I A.....)__git".#;::*:.:.1.L.-,_, W t1 1 I'.I L .I 4:21 - I g W 1., i 1 I1 r 1 1.,i i. 1 I0.4...al, j okia'. it 1 I IIi e q _ - ..I 06. 0 I i r—g• —••-- mtvre_4 i1I • NI, , I N--,- row 0 11 ./1-1 .—14' • • t.0 : 1 1( 1,...,7 T.,... . r-:Lf.::Ar'' 1,0- I( t 6......, ••, ;,.....„..) l'_ ,..• .,,, I, ..:,,,. ..••• 1,«•-•• SA-7 0 9 4-8 1 f' I._._:_,!- •__•%---'----'r--------'-LV''.0 14-82 1 Ali FLO,R PLAN 1- -C) A IV BLDG. 13 3 o NORTH ELEVATION y,, J xr.. V•• , J 1 W=M. s wwww EZ",:.•M M a r". 1 r t; 1 . L. 4_,....L—-) _ i. r.--.... :- . 1 7,.. ..2.. .1.7.1. 7. . : • _ ,[,..!. . . _ i i ,car 1,• .. .. L._._ : wArtr-v-.... GF 4., _t1 WEST ELEVATION l I 1 1 ` : I i a i 4 ru J EI• 42 — I: rf7". 1" 1 ' SOUTH ELEVATIONI L ,., .. t 4 — s I I a i i EAST ELEVATION I t d I y m j I, a 2 al . I. iI: i I -, i b I i MI ; •II s.•.J 1 1.. ` Mt,' , ...s4•SA—094-81 m; 1.• I V-014-82 O O O O O I!, FLc19R PLAN . AVDLQQ14 / A3 i'x L,c 1 c <Li f b-- m i I. o SITE OS., Iulffirsmmr.r:•, II c.wfh n 7 ,'. r u I oP,CA e RIVING 4LCT ICN'A-A- KEY.awn, rig '''e- ..".. 1 usli 5 w •• • 4K d 1i5.5;6,Ar Ili ,.,. .H.,,. i ,....e pt.,......n....1°.' ' Vill.".!;;Alk Ail 1 Ir. ,y YiFs/ iac.c..s.rr F.F. IbSo le.p..,al \ 1 e C i xA I.w iFF. so \ • I ; I1tI 7 R I--4 i fie...I..l yt—, in ti e.6cw a I C _, f LEGEND C iw.n.. r / 11> a IIMisae _w n w ri ,..i..,. Q EASEMENT turd,dN v.nN tom,a vir Alliltai SPECIFICATIONS NOR IgNICIPAL KIK IC N..CONSTRUCTIO. Wes;-- 10-s , I..p..»I e C,.,,...1.>,1....1...OTT c1,..rMARTIN.,.,a,,,.....,,.ANEMIC.PaLIC CONTRACT.SHALL f „+` CONS..,.n .+ F. F. IgoStl 3 0 CONSTRUCTION AND MISTgrill1 '5, 1..,',3,.......,..... kF. F. I8 f• NAI EROSION 140 PASSED.0 m S.All LOCATIONS OF.1.I.UTILITITS.0.An APPRO... TNT TRUE AND CORNICT LOCATION SO.TO AVOID. TIE CONTRACTOR,RESPONSIBILITY TO MUNE AIL NECESSARY M 1 411111111 InWili.1110v lL1-1;1111,4„0:',2_, jo.„. li.. 1.isr:awry,:CONS,. L..,.a, LITT TO., E ,nLI.ETM ( j!' Pp.a• a DIALS NI CONCRITOr z Qice_: uo . sm r -- —' _ I ro.,,. REATMENT , .,...,».,,,.,, a, LT COATED OR 16 GA. ,., R,.. . i 7 I NO. ION,. STRINGS. IA FOAROR.,...,.,.a(, .. N aw. `— n/ -.FL Stu care c.• w w S.1.1.1. aio,I ..1.0 F.A.S.....u. 1-1/2 , LINE,. 10.TN..AIM VIALS III 40 MOE MINIMA OR I- ,IMO T. 7 S n. ar c.E rncE",. I"•"""°1N1N1'cove.or o.,roo,..o..I.nlw smrc o 12. E FOA MU o..o nu No.Nr T LINED AND c"n AN.nr, 5 _ Si _ -RIVISION.PIPT JOINTS TO LIE PON-.OR...IC.JOINT. I o .c,,+" .'YVIM EY .NIT•ocncro,c.Ec,rn..Ecno., r"""c"oE,Ic. NULL.,oNL MAINTAIN.MINIM.COVE,.S.IN(.. s. T..10 III CLASS C.ALL AAAAA WINS 10 INTR.MO 111A-21-11-1077 OM.101 REVISION.ALL FITTING.111.TO St 0 ANn•I, ANSI E IE.V AND S..0 EE I„u. ACCOADANCE TM TIII SPECIFICATIONS OF TNT CI.CI 111.011 SA-094-81 11 1NE MAMMA STATE NEAL.DEPARTMENT..1.PRESSURE SIS CCEPT...I.TO FINAL 711-111. IRE......I„ OF S TO RE Er..- "--'-"`-_•. w,nlu TN.CON,,.c,u AND.E o.-SITE PRIOR TO CI, 1 0/7S I Il IIIIUIIIII T. i GENERAL NOTES a N irmno, r.. Yl..Yi..lio, ,. ray MPsIN wo.. ai..o..,..TW.o a.. 1IO i.ww+Ta+.rw r.r a.- e t,['j'I ee.rsN.cw+,..err,,,,m asw.Y..o r•.w...,arrnu deramot;1 la.. - TM rrc wrwwq.,..km e•.,w, v wy Il' vn um+w-.NM-...:oe.mw+.cr o++.w,, b : Wj AF Be w.,...cw w...n.u+r..aa,...w wh.vas P u. t- t /_ ra+r..i c+ro.su a R v PLAN u.Y M w.i.Rnwtiwa Ka M.C*4 CbiN_ In-mrit-aliritel O iwwn on.w.w,a uPvo)..wur ww.y„ os. ra I gm _ 9f 1b6 nrn6(' i 11,I WW1 ,11 - me C'.°YR'f .tY/++t4rNfw tm.......vx.eo, Da , ir p o Vlat ' w:ij' . , xuq.0 w.P+v.. I mf!le , 4,61:-. i1,.,,1 1 I4_ yse , O'I' LA.NjK,[,E•QL Y EPM ALpJCT e1.DC'c. 1 II v ca*c,:•w*e_ww ac in.-Waw.rc n. _,., wIV LAIjtr alt e, ems t: 0 m 0 0,_ P' , eg a 2 P 1 io LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANT SCHEDULE e pr m uG ei om.......-. i iT W P.u..N.. - J ...ti. 1-e CD ' owow. au, n...1....5. u-,.,ill 2.11. I R .wo wrun uqw pu...-yTM.n rvw,e.-, zv:u..ue CD u m w...-ar.os..r<n w..T m. 2. 40 n- a....au...... .. o) uwF,aw F ._'T a. v.e.-PAP ® w,P. . wMn_w.rw we...WAN P.e.. y u NN.,,,,...0 w.omumav aa uru.'.'w.w..waTs.v: N-r W Si e.ay. w\ Pwnfl"^' , w a— movna ZOy af•. 0_v.U. wx.w'-.- -.^.+T 7wou. iW II© a R. - vr..a. In 0 . v.,..ww a,+N.._.vw{n.v.,......... 4-4%•S.rt. µ5 P.fCJnv DETNL-n'r JJEmc,oernil-ttc a jll 1 .t.... r<u.n r..,cwu..-...a.-.-uro-i ..,...c.T 4 le,tr c... a n. i10)1SA-094-81 i z 8V-014-82 s 4' L. c; 1 1 ' 1 O O ...V( 0wva.rcsw w.n arr. f y .w+WI wn• arm.a a.a w+wn+ 61d.s I .M 1.n16ek I.t.66 hw.y.bP.A4+a. n Nui s w: L,:,_,,,—_,i! I..w.n M.6 m.ws m.a.u..w.w b.;q,.,- - r..y..aa I a e.e. wv tf.nu, I N.w,y,..• 1 w...0 a ra.+ uun.-rug I OAI(oItU011JgL EUfIOf\1 7i e M x i TRAA15l/6R6E 6ELtIDA1 Af 0 i w1•0 ° ia31 W Y g g a Q le I I I/1 S A--094-81..:• j V-0114-82 a 2 4 NENORANDUM OF CONCURRENCE APPLICATION NO(s) : SA-094-81 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct four (4) one-story concrete tilt-up buildings (12 to 15) to be used as a business park or for light warehousing. PROPONENT: Koering, Holvick de Regt (Washington Technical Center) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street and Powell Avenue S.W. LEAD AGENCY: Building and Zoning Department DATE OF ERC REVIEW: Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under PP-056-80, R-057-80 on February 1980 are within the scope of that original proposal and the environmental determination of non-significance is still valid. This decision was reached following a presentation by Roger Blaylock . of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, David Clemens, Roger Blaylock,. Steve Munson, Gary Norris and James Matthew. Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of the ERC on application SA-094-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Impact Statement: Earlington Park Dated: February 1981 2) Application (s) : PP-056-80, R-057-80, FP-096-81 . This memorandum of concurrence is issued subject to the following conditions : 1 ) Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way will be unsafe until the intersection is signalized. Therefore, Powell Avenue cannot be opened to Grady Way until the signalization is completed to City standards. 2) The Fihal Plat for Washington Technical Center must be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. SIGNATURES: A&_//// .27 7/ Ronald G. Nelson avid Clem ens Buildingl & Zoning Director Policy Development Director dfg. R' hard C. Hou hton Public Works Direct z Date circular- Comments due : ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF _ 101_ 81 - APPLICATION No(s) . SA-094-81 PROPONENT : Koering, Holvick de Regt PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center Proposal to construct four (4) one-storyBriefDescriptionofProject : concrete tilt-up buildings (12-15) to be used as a business parkorforlightwarehousing. . LOCATION; Southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street and Powell Avenue' S.W. SITE AREA: 146, 330 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross):± 46,404 sq. ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 31 . 7% . IMPACT REVIEW NONE - MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :X 3) Water & water courses : X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life ; X 6) Noise : X 7) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : undeveloped_ east : industrial south : undeveloped west : undeveloped Land use conflicts : minimal View obstruction : further evaluation with individual buildings 9) Natyral resources :X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/.Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : Not applicable 13 ) Trip ends (ITE ) : (From EIS) Assuming 50% office & 50% light industi 649 'trips traffic impacts : MOOr 14 ) Public services : X 15 ) Energy :X 16) Utilities: x 17 ) Human health: x 18 ) Aesthetics : P X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS: EIS previously prepared. Supplemental traffic data provided.1 . Project generally conforms to EIS ' 2. Traffic impacts remain crucial although somewhat - reduced. Signatures: 3, Flood hazard remains unreso d. Y zaK4,=-,tt.;„,..•...:_c.Li-5'-'7'L--- Ronald G. Nelson s id R. -Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director g R' hard C. Ho ghtoni ublic Works Direct r RENT19N BUILDING & ZONING DE^- RTMENT DE v ELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 — APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT : Holvick, deRe&t & Koering PROJECT TITLE: Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines. 1 LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. TO: • ' El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : x El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 LI UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. 'PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 Y REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1/ice 0PRovED APPROVED 'WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED y FRerePrevention BurentonFireDept. auCEENOWIEJO JUL, 1 1982 DATE:6 /ke SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMEN'- [VISION ; TgL/-T)Ac 0 APPROVED • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED " T 42,./‹._ 1--Xie__' 7 621,,,___v- /112:ee W 1)02,1,;certz_e__ ls, ,/,,,--261y e/A7 (1/ 4e c .-----if crz, gG-1. Pl°'3"ca 44 DATE: 3 "7 L- SIGNATURE iiIRECTOR OR AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 6/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 49 ,;(7 tr APPROVED " 0 APPROVED .WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED g(7" 61-4? .. '>(7/ / C I 1' '/ 7 dmeilp '1?e'i/y1 (' 5e6/ 1 x, DATE: Vg/i e SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 6/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (--e, ftc E a'APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 7e..e....e....)1.-e.,-----------... DATE: ri?"` i- g - _, I'GNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 o REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : LIT(LI Pi i JAPPROVED 0 APPROVED 'WITH CONDITIONS , 0 NOT APPROVED I f 1 1 DATE :7 fZ/‘Z SIGNATU1 OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISIONS 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPiARTMENT/DIVISION : ElAPPROVED • IDAPPROVED .WITH CONDITIONS EJ NOT APPROVED i c----ity(2 .G..----- DATE: 7 . Z7F- SIGNATURE OF 'DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENTATIVE " REVISION 5/1982 H. I I 1 S I w f7., 6 11 Ir NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JULY 13, 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : ALTERRA CORPORATION (BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK) Appeal by Alterra Corporation, File AAD-052-82, of a decision by the Environmental Review Committee regarding imposition of certain mitigating measures upon a rezone request,. File R-129-80, for a 71 . 16 acre parcel from G-1 , General Zone, to M-P, Manufacturing Park; located north of S.W. 7th Street, east of the proposed P-1 Channel, - south of the old Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul Railroad Right-of-way, and west of the extension of Thomas Avenue S. COLUe2g, deRjE.GtaMiOTjR,II O Application o s '3e-app oval to locate four (4) one-storybuilding (12-15) on the subject site to be used as a business park or for light warehousing, File SA-094-81 ; property located at the southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street & Powell Avenue S.W. HQLVICK, deREGT & KOERING Application for site approval to locate five (5) one-story buildings (1-5) on the subject site to be used as a business park or for light warehousing, File SA-095-81 ; property located at the northwest corner of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street. 1 HQLVICK deREGT & KOERING Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 ( 2) (A) (1 ) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines , File V-014-82, to be asociated with Washington Technical Center , Final Plat, File FP-096-81 . Specifically related to site plan reviewsSA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and SA-101-81 for Holvick, deRegt Koering. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 13, 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: July 2 , 1982 RONALD G. NELSON BUILDING AND ZONING DIRECTOR I CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THEIPROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before 'me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on. the 30th day of June, 1982. SIGNED: IL A 4I4 OF R THE CITY OF RENTON x POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055Ico- o94TFD SEP1 4e, P February 5, 1982 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR David Schuman First City Equities 800 5th Avenue, Suite 4040 Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: REZONE APPLICATION ADJACENT TO SPRINGBROOK CREEK Dear Mr. Schuman: Pursuant to our meeting of February 2, 1982, with Mr. Ed Sullivan of Holvick DeRegt and Koering, this letter is to summarize our findings. First, in order to consider the rezone application, the 17 acres required for the P-1 Channel system must be dedicated by separate deed document or by the recording of the proposed final plat currently in our offices. Second, a summary of the findings of your engineering staff regarding the storage capacity within the 17 acres as compared to the required storage from the HDK site should be prepared. Once the dedication of the property has been completed and the summary of the flood storage solution has been provided, this department will be prepared to recommend that the rezoning of the remaining 25 acres within the Washington Technical Center project should be approved. As a practical matter, we would strongly recommend to the Building and Zoning Department that the lapplication be accepted at such time as the Hearing Examiner has recommended approval of the final plat to the City Council, subject only to the receipt of the flood storage summary. As we also discussed, we can consider your rezone application as an amendment to the prior application so long as we can obtain fresh documentation and application forms so that thel record will be clear and concise. If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience. Very ruly your. , Uero/2d c6666e- avid R. Clemens Policy Development Director DRC:cl cc: Holvick DeRegt and Koering Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Revision 3/1981 4182.1191 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: A--qy y-5 PP u.4 q pedyikeede &aiie o o.Si f0 e a dw , {' koefer 1110 wireks Location: Sk)ebriter ert Se4) 7aS S it( '"'' .. rester. Applicant: lV/e de Cp TO :Public ks Department ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: /W, /49/ Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Darks Department Building Department 171 Police Department fl Uthers: _ COMMENTS ORI SUGGESTIONSREGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON 40241100 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions f Not Approved Arrfir, avd s k sue-/1/0C-7 04^- f e erd z e a.macr s• Gs u e DATE: /2- 2 L/7 Signature of Dire. or or Auth ripe Representative REVIEWING D PIARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions L] Not Approved II DATE: Si-6-nature of Director or Authorized Representative it Revision 3/1981 Ala 1$1 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Ap p l i c a t i o :5 ® 41. 0 ,{ SITE AppAl e.: . FM?imenfA P.Jedate )O9O • 0,.tiais" past* ioie vireo/444 or•Cor Itkat*maw Lo cation• t i+ i 1 Q'1 6! I fps Q ' 1 K 4.r 4 Applicant: -t :r.- 4 t ®IL ,'C TO :Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: I ` i Traf • Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ti. ities Eng. Division G ire Department Parks Department Q Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: c r-e QfI, Approved (K pproved with Conditions Not Approved Qh 6-/r4 , e 41/-4 n o , e fro J a f- !' LEA> rtliar /D C-On S//'mac c i .e s7 Art, a cc e 55 /O 1? -OV ilea/ L1/7/frn e Un5/l ie-Liv_ DATE: hP-02/- F/ Signature of Director or Authorized Repre n t v7e REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved ®Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative OF R yI o THE CITY OF RENTON n .x. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR POLICE DEPARTMENT 09A co• HUGH R.DARBY, CHIEF 0,9 Q, i? o MEMORANDUT Tri 198AStDEC TO: The Environmental Review Committee FROM: Lieutenant D. R. Persson e,310046 W311". ~ RE: Springbrook Technical Center After reviewing both applications for site approval in the Springbrook Technical Center, I find that both requests will have a substantial impact on the Renton Police Department's operation. As I am sure you are aware, the Renton Police Department requested six additional officers for 1982. This amount of officers was necessary to meet the increasing demands placed upon the police department by the general public. The six positions were denied in the 1982 budget, which means that we cannot continue to offer the same level of service to the citizens of Renton if building is allowed to continue without additional help for the police department. Naturally the impacts that a development such as this will place on the department can be mitigated to some extent by proper building methods. 1These methods include but are not limited to such things as proper placement 'of outside lighting; burglar alarm systems; security windows, doors, and locks. Another major concern of this development is the traffic that will be generated. At the present time we have a traffic situation at Southwest 7th and Hardie that is unbelievable. Everyone agrees that a traffic signal is necessary at this intersection, however, the signal and funds for the signal do not appear to be present or even available in the immediate future. This development will further impact this particular intersection as well as the intersections of 7th and Lind, 10th and Lind, Lind and Grady Way, as those intersections will be the major access points to the new development. Therefore, it is my suggestion that this development not be allowed until : I There is a signal at 7th and Hardie. 2) Powell Avenue Southwest be completed all the way through to Grady Way, and the intersection at Grady Way and Powell be signalized. 3) The intersection at Lind and Grady Way be improved; some fairly inexpensive improvements at the intersection of Lind and Grady can be accomplished which would greatly enhance the traffic flow on a short term basis. Because of the above reasons, I strongly urge a declaration of significance be issued on this project. rcev l s l un 3/ 19j( q,giel RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: I••"'`cf® 1 FAppRoumc., . ze toes: kedde Note CAILAir_Pal,90s.Sele f®he Wedaft 4&ci s ' rk o $or((ykt MINAS Lccation:SaiG®r r. iert SW 7 th(SA c9/Studpii e.c.flW Applicant: KoerKoerinzi 1'n'el i TQ ;IPublic Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: A2MAY Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: E]Uti lities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department wilding Department n Police Department nOthers:- ---- COMMENTS OR! SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (-3L G IlappOved [] Approved with Conditions El Not Approved DATE: )2 -2,2_--z? 9Sireof1DirectororAtiorizedRepresentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved D Approved with Conditions CJ Not Approved DATE:_ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative N2NORANDUM OF CONCURRENCE APPLICATION NO(s) : SA-094-81 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct four (4) one-story concrete tilt-up buildings (12 to 15) to be used as a business park or for light warehousing. PROPONENT: Koering, Holvick de Regt (Washington Technical Center) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southwest corner 'of S.W. 7th Street j and Powell Avenue S.W. LEAD AGENCY: Building and Zoning Department 1 DATE OF ERC REVIEW: Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under PP-056-80, R-057-80 on February 1980 are within the scope of that original proposal and the environmental determination of non-significance is still valid. This decision was reached following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, David Clemens, Roger Blaylock, Steve Munson, Gary Norris and James Matthew. Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of the ERCIon application SA-094-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Impact Statement: Earlington Park Dated: February 1981 2) Application (s) : PP-056-80, R-057-80, FP-096-81 . This memorandum of concurrence is issued subject to the following conditions: 1 ) Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way will be unsafe until the intersection is signalized. Therefore, Powell Avenue cannot be opened to Grady Way until the signalization is, completed to City standards. 2) The Final Plat for Washington Technical Center must be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. SIGNATURES: if' Ronald G. Nelson avid 2 7 lemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director R ' hard' C. Hou hton Public Works Direct Date circula`«: Comments due : ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 101_ 81 APPLICATION No(s) . SA-094-81 PROPONENT : Koering, Holvick de Regt PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center Proposal to construct four (4) one-storyBriefDescriptionofProject : concrete tilt-up buildings (12-15) to be used as a business parkorforlightwarehousing. LOCATION: Southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street and Powell Avenue S.W. SITE AREA : 146,330 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) ± 46,404 sq. ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : 31 . 7% . IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :X 3 ) Water & water courses : X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life : X 6) Noise : X 7) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : undeveloped east : industrial south : undeveloped west : undeveloped Lund use conflicts : minimal View obstruction : further evaluation with individual buildings 9) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : 1 X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : Not apilicable 13 ) Trip ends (ITE ) : (From EIS) Assuming 50% office & 50% light industri traffic impacts49 trips Major 14 ) Public services : i X 15 ) Energy : X 16) Utilities:X 17 ) Human health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) A cheology/history: X COMMENTS : EIS previously prepared. Supplemental traffic data1 . Project generally conforms to EIS provided. 2. Traffic impacts remain crucial although somewhat reduced. V Signatures: 3. Flood hazard remains unreso d. 04Al L4j-/ Ronald G. Nelson id R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director R ' hard C.- Ho ghton ublic Works Direct r le c:eved— 1eQ rl s(62 TKe Transportation Engineering & Planning Consultants January 11, 1982 GrOW Mr. Michael Selman 1230 Oakmead Parkway Suite 210 Sunnyvale, CA 94086 SUBJECT: SPRINGBROOK TECHNICAL CENTER - TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Selman: Thank you for asking us to review the revised site plan for the Spring- brook Technical Center and comment on the expected changes in impacts between it and the original site plan which is known as the Earlington Park. As you requested, we made a comparison of changes in the trip generation, the character of the traffic, and the effect of these traf- fic volumes on the street network. In summary, we find the daily trip generation with the Springbrook Site Plan would decrease from approximately 20,190 vehicles per day (vpd) to 13,340 vpd. This represents a 33 percent decrease. The evening peak hour volumes will reduce from about 2,660 vehicles per hour (vph) to about 1,620 vph. This represents a 39 percent decrease from the original proposal . The character or vehicle mix is also expected to change as the number of heavy and medium-duty trucks declines due to the reduction in the amount of heavy and light warehousing associated with the project. Almost as significant as the reduction in trip gen- eration is the change in the Springbrook Technical Center Site Plan which calls for a connection to Monster Road. It is expected that this access could be used by as much as 15-25 percent of daily and peak hour traffic volumes. While the calculated level of service may not change, the average delay at major intersections in the vicinity of the project will definitely be reduced because of the decrease in trip generation, the lower number of heavy trucks, and the effects of traffic diverting onto the new access via Monster Road. The trip generation comparison was made using the same trip generation rates applied in the traffic analysis for the Earlington Park project, so the results would be directly comparable. The significant reduction in trip generation can be attributed to both the reduction in total square feet from approximately 1,981,330 to 1,097,500, and to the reduc- tion in office space from 490,580 square feet to 221,200 square feet. Likewise, there was a large reduction in warehousing from approximately 1,152,280 square feet to 258,460 square feet (about a 77 percent reduc- tion) . Although all of the business park space proposed in the Earlington Site Plan has been replaced by higher intensity business park in the Springbrook Technical Center Site Plan, this is more than offset by the reductions in office and warehousing space. The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 23-148th Avenue SE, Bellevue, Washington 98007 • (206) 641-3881 lie Mr. Michael Selman uMANSI January 11, 1982 ero\ipPage2' As mentioned above, the percentage of trucks in the traffic stream is expected to reduce significantly as a result of the decrease in heavy and light warehousing activity. It is estimated that these uses would have generated between 2,450 and 4,290 trips per day. The number of heavy trucks would be expected to drop by 70 to 80 percent to between 810-1,415 trucks per day. It should be expected that the number of small trucks would increase as a result of the increased emphasis on business park activity. Under the original site plan, it was estimated that the business park would generate between 260 and 1,030 trucks per day. Under the revised site plan, it would be expected this number would increase by approximately 15 to 20 percent, resulting in the increased number of trucks generated by business park uses to range between 310 and 1,220 per day. While there will be an increase in the number of small trucks, there will be a net reduction in the number of trucks per day by 1,590 to 2,685, or about half as many as would be generated under the original site plan. Possibly one of the most significant changes in the proposed Spring- brook Technical Center Site Plan is the connection to Monster Road. While this change will imply the need to make some improvements to Monster Road, it also results in a significant number of daily and PM peak hour trips using this road to gain access to Grady Way and Sunset Boulevard. As indicated above, it is estimated that between 15 and 25 percent of the travel could use this route to travel to and from the site. It is expected that the majority of people using this route would be employees, since the route is somewhat circuitous for the infrequent visitor, yet offers a very convenient alternate to the congestion that is expected to exist along Rainier Avenue S. and Grady Way to the east of the site. Because of the high volume that already exists along the road system in the' vicinity of the project, and because of continued non-project traffic growth, the calculated levels of service are not expected to change any more than half a level (e.g. , from D-E to D) from those estimalted in the Earlington Park Traffic Analysis. The change in con- gestioln levels will be realized through the reduction in delay at intersections. In cloing,. we conclude that the Springbrook Technical Center is fore- casted to create noticeably less impact on the surrounding street and transportation system as compared to the impacts anticipated from de- velopment of Earlington Park. I trust this letter responds to your questions relating to changes in the traffic impacts that result from the proposed project. If you or the City of Renton have any questions regarding our findings and conclusions, I encourage you to call me. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. David D. Markley, Principal cc: Loren Davis, Deborah Krouse a I i •e N e ii • ,, ; , •I • .. . . . . , • • ; • , , ; ; 1 i .1 i 1 -, ; ; 1 7 ; 1 i ; ; ; i : ; • , • • • , • ,II 1 ; , 11 ,, ,. . i •. 1 , ,, • : : . • 1 ,I " I " i i t i " " i ' . • ... e€i_.&••4,70,v/..spe.,Aelesiok. " ' i " i '• i 1 s ril , . 1' ' • 111 ! . ,. . ---t----7-1-!—r-ill ! ; ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! : . ' ' -/to 44•44/2.97ro..! •con/vgoet&O.4. : ! "t ! : i ft.: ; i I it 1111 ; : ; : ! ... • f", •' •iltiit ( 1111 • ( / 1 1111 ( 1111 pa 1 r. " I ' " . . . . -i i- -it 4 t 11-t 4-- 1.4 i + i -, + , ; ; ; ; , , i •fHtii . , ; Hill ! , : • : -" . . . . , . ; ; , , ; • ; " i 4,-. . ...-.4 i t :41 4,. .1.4-j -44. 4- 1 : •,. t ' 44 i .: •. ! : 14, 11.1 mi .1 ,, , t , , ii ti _tt , 4t . 11 ' . 1i . 1 , 1 I 1 i i t 1 i _+, i t., . 1 t s.i..,.i . ,. 1 , , •, •i , 1 1 , t , , . 44 ! 4I • • • • • • • t • e.I ' •1 t t t Itt . 1. 3 tt.. 4111.1. ' • IIII :i_t_i 1 i 11 ! t 1 1_1_4_i ! ,_i I i !_k_n___!__! , „__t_ii..-1.____Lt_i_t_l_i_t_l 1 _LI ; • i I _ - • 1.I.1 i i 1 t , Lf__ 11 t t_1_1_,_t_t_ .. itt. It ! " ' ' 11till 11 " 1 ! i ! s. ' • : ' t4 ilf ! titm i t -, . . 1 It t. 1 t. '. . t. . . . , Mitt ! tis : L; 1Ii •:-.f.. ' ' I '.. . .....' ',...: 4F-F-A-: ... ..:_:. .t. i• Ll_..t._t t t t t, ; t.• t 1• 1 ti t, 1, t, Wthg., i5Y.E.P_irnee, t.1 I 1_1_:_.1._:F-AeUfJ4,70") . Preg: '; i 141115E:L:frh96,EXt ; -: ;Turrit: I, 1 ; ; 1 1 1 AZt 1 . • ttli I il ' • • Ji ; • i i : ' •oFferc4; PAielcHi ;I ; i , t---. , : ... , !. .4Pto)590 ; 1 410jseo It tt •ti. te -I Tit! =6'i 1 0, SQ9! .. . ze.„304,1 • -1 11 .../. 1 ill It , !vs,;.. ...44 Pt i I ; li !z•szicii i :105-,zrx2 : 1 338)470 ti-, t T 1 5,S 1. 1- is 1(4111417TI 1 ; j 39,3049j ,tr il • . I -- . -LI; , ; ; ; • .1 ; L-(4/4.7.' : r/PEE Ha41,.14 l I i577)34-0 I i-. — • I I I :373 340 I I 1 1 I .1444.e? - : t ! I i 1 il 2.i il-CF: •t t,iACAti)74,- tleiNu-obvi.- 1-1-'41Z, osJ -11 .3t-7 , S T . 4j940-I- I i I 1 11,74#4)J W 777 1 1 ii0i fi; 17741trrolt...: • , ; 1 I i--7-7 -7t • • , 1 1 ozz •)0 1 'V 114 646 II Vel '330 I ; ii,i050 1 iii iir . i . f , ,• . . ! - 4 * liktg I 1 •,, 20, 1,90,it :, , Ii • • , , ifi ! ti , ! 1 ' , ; ' ! ! • • ' ,Ii4. 1 '.. ' ' . . . . " , i ! 'tlii ° : 1r1 ; n ! II ; Wili JAI 1 1 .11 111 1 11 1, 1111.tt 1 : 1i :1pg,,,J6akobk..; "rtuf Cr.21 : ; ! ! ! ! ! . ; ; ; ' , ' " 1 ; 11 ! ; •! ! ' 1 !-IJ51 It 11' 1111 1 tt itiiilll '•e.60 ti H I 1 l•til • jilt4.SOI(.1400. _.__.i 70j 00_.____!_;• t.)ZOO_ T , •..II ple...9+.+4__ , 27 ,r___;_ti I t t • t t I11 :6VSIAIElak:Pg !t-j/Z.52,e01 ; /.14-j 750 ; :).70,4.20 ; 1 i Z7.53.70: I 1 1 i i I i li;0 50. , 1 T iii,T-17; !1 • :t3u5+:0Ff....4 :PK. il,/.10,off-: : 4,././ 110 : : 642 C•91). ; 1 /24 670: I h 0 I 1 v64 I -.i 1 1,k)goi • ; 0,:o6.17,1 :. J • :, 1 1 I 1 T, ;1-1614-7 its1402-E.A.u.if 1-14: ; L/31, es2 .: i , .— ivea, (.711 ; , 1 1 .1 F, t ,tic•I .; .; ,i1-:-4„ 1 i I I ; ; :.060. 1 I :0E.444/1wileceityl.. r../c,'„ t, ;' : i19,..Seq : ! : :— 8.,5-50 (a) i t t.• i I I 00e1 t 1 i , -.-l' i ! T, f I, ti: 11 ii til.t 1 LL .. ; 1 1••;., . . NiFitivriATL,HrPtiob,_.:.„____;_;_•+CrOj ipoo ":. :—:___.' i t 1 D, 11 . ; , . . i ;I ; 1 ! . 14 ' i : 1 . 71 ' ; • • . - • •ifikE4gAt54-1 1444 bEw; I 11 . — : . . 1, les-'z'a3; ; ; •/-55", za.) kii) ; ; ; , L. , 1-4r; 1 ! 1 ; ki#00'. I.1 i : t • 1 . : 1 t tr; I 11 t 1r ‘ Hlt I......17"_'-;,--; ...-.----:„...IIHW riel-41,-; ! ! 1 ! ,,564040 "931 too: : :I, 0•011%,0: 1, ,- 1 144.0 1 1 .11-i,¢041 13., 40 : •i. , 1 f , i ii t • • I t 4Hliiill ' . 7 WW1 i. t. ', . ', . . „11. ' 1 ti ItMil '.• Wilt . ' " ' i ' ' ' • '141744I 14 : 4 ' . 0 . . ; • 74.. ; ; I : . ii ; ; . . . ; 4 . . . . . ; 4 , 4 ; ; 774I 1 : 14.Will ; 11174 ; ; ; ; • Li . . 4i7. .1Wilii 1 4, 1 • 414 4f4444 . : ' ' 4 • 1 ; ; ; Itlis eilit. t. : 11 - teeliTe e ; : tee ! • ' 0"I'r; .• ;P:0:406: : .4- ..-40,6i1 . 1,0;t7i) .4,t! : !I= ; i i I i 1 : ' if.t:•;1 ! Li •• II, ! ; ! ;- ; • : • ; , i ; ; ; ; ; • ; • • • ; • • • ; '•'; ; ; . •! . . . . ; • i ! iii-i . ; ;,- , itii- : ; , ii t-i , 1 , i 0R,61 ; : i. 61 _ : 0,:sv 4 : /124:- 404E-441113.f.ilitti 1;1 tt ., , H i„ , „ : i ! : • ! i . C93. , GI t:— : : .• : ; i ; ; ;I;'4 (134/ tif1-11/8i 1;:. ) ; f' i I ! ft 4.i '• 6 d 1 . - - - • r t - • , - , t ,---, Ii - rt i H. -.1. 'I. ! ':It•An. I , „ . . . . , . „ , . i r ' l ! ! ' I ' l ; . ' . . . ' .I . , . . ,.I , t , t . t 1 I .1 „ . ,. 1 , . ,f i i f ; 4, • 4..1 1iii . r . . . . . . . f . iitt •t • I . I • ,4 t * • 4 • • ; t * t t • ; t1 ; . . . . . . . . . . ! i :f . • is to ifitliff i ti , • I • • • • • t It t-f. t . tt • f t • 9 -i . . I ; I 1 . . I 1 i . N E 1 . I 1 I I 4 I 4 I 4 I I I I ; j . a ' 4 i I ; I ; : ; i 144 1 • : ' ; ; ' ; ; ; . ' . . . 1 - ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' i ". : ". 1. : : : : : . .. : , : , : 11 1 : , : 1 .1 1 : I... ..; ; L . • • vv;iL,1 . .• : ; i iiw -: - ii4 it i-i I I; i ; t I , , -; : : : : ; . 1 ; i , • 2)) 11 ; ; ; ; - :1 - , 1. ----.;--• • t-i- ii •-1-1-1 1 -; ; • ; ; I ; " ; ; ; ; ; ; , ; ; ; ; ; ;„ ; ; ; ; • ; , „ H , ; „ ; ; „ HIII - -1-4.,.,_.;-;-_;:1- 1 . : - : 1 : : : ; : : : : : ; : ; . . . . . ; ; : : ; : 1 ,, : :: : ; : : : ii. : • H ; ; ; ; . ; _. , 11._,.li .....1.1 ;_; .1. 1 , , 1 4 ... ; i . . : , ; ; ;1 • • • • • ; ; ; : r ; 11 ; ; ; : 'Ii1 :111 : il 1101-; -1.11- 1 .•-1 1 .: 1 it . ; . ; 11 it . ; . . . . . , , , , . . t , , • ., • • • 1 ; ,1 I 1 ; 1 . LI r -1.1 , I - - ; • 1, • ;1 ; 11 , ; • , . ' • ; 11 .1 I : 11 t.11 ; , 1 . ., , Itt ., 1 , , • t ; . . ; . , 11 1 ;;J I tiL____IL..L2 ; i L. ; • I il t ; 1 ; • 1-;,--.------ --;----;,--4, -1- -;1 ; ii . H fiallif ; ;••• •• , I 'I , , , . . ; , 1 iiiii :tf i ; ; I + . • ••H : ; ,i , ; i I • -,- i , , 4.- • ' i fl . , .. , , ,, 4 -; iit, I, ; ; ;; ; ; : . , i.i61•-z:0.4H, ,oi i5i# ---- - -i • ,,Olii,..; i 1 I - ill 0Q /.. ?9 1; : ea:tits-0 ; 7 , : : i 10/01.1 , • . • , i , i 1 1 1 :0 Ot, 1 ',, i•e?c0:1, I I LI-1- I 1 I I - I 1 i Cr2 PS's/ ' '. 'To? --1--- H I I, 1, .,/ m'cr•ri. Hva“3-5' tr34. I1I ,1-, i i-i--1., ' 1.' ' el' I ' ' . I . i re,',,-rt- -7 7--:-±. ',- "4:16i.re.'711- 1- -4-:-. 4 H 1.'164,10.1P14ii V4-711 ! I } t- 4 I I 'I I 1I 11 44I i720A i1 1 i I Cf(3 r Ei, r-., H I C543 r6 E1:. 1: . ::• '&, 170 713-abM1 4-4b-1--7rK-i, I I 0 7 i I... 1 ;' ' , ; .I 1 '1_ ' ,"• z•z, r. 1 ,c? ft ! TV 1 _ .1.. . 5,,I;11 1 I 11 i ,cvTr-izt i ; :cpsei„,2 , t (3 r), ! '. •• 4o rcarfrl,r i1.00ti• 1 Ail iiciit I I I . I 02.2.5L2 I i ', 02 9/or,t' ' asz f-t,i f I v4or.52./-1, ci,7-31r,isr\s' ,L 1 i 1 1 1. a 1 I 4IrE:0-4---.74-17--i7ti 1 1 . 002. ,72) 1 , , Pol .0LI , i -,0o9 1 1 ",iddo, • . ILti ' . 11- 1 -- - - - [ 11111 :I:IL 1 1 Willfil W "Hlii1H211, 4-17XJ--t o.ciasi9r,sild.S:.1111111- ti 1 I 1 1 ! ; " ' ; I , ; ' il ' ' . ' • ' : • i . •li 11,--lift -II . i lililiiii i '. ; ', 1 ' i ; : Ii ! ! ; Iii iii , 291.'t: I dO 9 11: — --- .I 101E04 IT • - t- .' II `C'g? 0',I, 0*491740. 469! ZO.'1., ILi ' • , , • i iiI-- ; ' ' . - . -1 ' ' ' 1 ' i I . r 1 ; 4.JC701-..,..__4141.1_t Oili• ' 1 1., 1 i _+ I 0.:Pi712'.-17L Z. j _.;_p,6 6Z,F. _LI .PS0 2)-1,', ,! nt-i.latiri_izeiff7H.12.,_: ill 47* -' _.1.- _ _ . :Ill 1 Pebc.-q2' I : --'• ! 1 p-K zi_c! ! I '7,,/ 724/1.0i , 2_,,4-»--; i; 1,....., Li,r5s-F 0:72(-go, 1, P1-7 S2 1-1- II, 0:eini ;,- --f-fOoi I, ' --1-- - i- -- --I- 1--i I oz.s•roi,* - oss(01,-17: 1, i, ' 1 :—" i 1 I 1 I ,' .- 20,,„.,(• i.- -2 Jddio-I - I :•• • i ' •I .1•• :1 7. 1, i . 1- - - 11 I 1 , • • tiIIIit . 7-1-v-ko_L; 7, 22--istwd: I : I 7Twie!i • . . •Li 117-044-uu: 21.9.'96vis ::, iz,-7gdfidi, ", ::,712p.,,d , ,,o,_.),,natty-d- . 1-..---"-. ---"..- --4 --..'-- -4- ' 1 il 111 ' 11-11 '--- t-I-H- -i !-- -- -1 -1 ---t • ; -fil 'fi lit.iliIT, -; 1H, -; ; ; 7,- 'I I --t •--1--; 1- •; I ; ; ; '1 1 1 1 1 .- ;- -• - - - - - - - -11 1 . 1-1 4- 11 - i if-4 -1-1-1. 1L ..I .t. l..11 _1 t , , ; : ttil : ; , , H1t ; 1 ; 11 ; 111 1111111 .;I 1-4 4 I I 4 .4 11. r --1- -L. 1...1. 1- 1.4 1 1 - 1 1 11 .1 1 1 1 1 , : ; 11 I t i : • l• 11 ' 1 ; 1- 4 t 1 1 I -i 1 1 .. _1. 1 LI. ..1 .--1.H . _1_ . . 1 . : : . ; I I 1 ;• 4V-0----; ehf-dar" • t 11 111-1 111 ; 1111 11111 ,1 • 1 ; ; i : . 11 1. 1, 1.. .. 1_1. 1 .1 / -4. . I ; ; : ; • 1 ; :, •1 ; ; ; • 111 . 1- -1 1- 111111-11 Ponizobt-vcr7• re vi_re-etzT0-0:429 veize.4 •: ! 1; It ! I; `; 1....-1__ i . ...; ..„.. . i ; il -; ; ', i W;l 7, 70.--021/4"PlmosieYc'2.'kiriaW:- -1"-i—:—..----1: -", I,- '; ; ttilli-f."4-1—,- : • 1H : . i 11. ! ,: ! i1, : : i : ,, : : . . .. . 1 . . , .. . . . , ; ; ; , ; ti 11 ; ! ; ; ; ; ; H ; ; ; , . . s \ 1 d d i, i it 1: lif. Date circulated :a pz1 Comments due : 1212404 EINVIIROINMEINTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET ECF - Al APPLICATI',ON No (s ) , 6p"Oqqu31 PROPONENT': / QM., fierkt 'Gk ete "R PROJECT TITLE : S1TF 44ppA01/ Brief Description of Project :Re/War s'1 PIV&I d q) 410Seqiery 0aftts-)Iraieuse& &btlfi fez r&•r•'‘r/iikf wertll0tit, LOCATION Stikorser of$L c SwellAfe-Si i SITE AREAAlf 1 33O9‘ BUILDING AREA (gross) *q, %Yyd* DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 31.14,0 IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : V 4) Plant life : 5 ) Anim'al life : 6) Noise : c./ 7 ) Light & glare : 8) Land; Use ; north : east : 1 south : west : Landl use conflicts :( Viewi obstruction : L/ 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk; of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip i ends ( ITE ) : tragic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health : V 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : l- • 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : ', Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by :4%4 Title : c1i- c ___/-i?`5 - Date : / - FORM: ERC-06 f Date circulated : 11 ift/ Comments due : l2. „g1 g4fi EINIVIRONIMEINITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 10/ - fA f APPLICATION No (s ) . 6,1<:sqq"lai PROPONENT : <bp eriet A/leek.gle Reif PROJECT TITLE : Appgeritfiew., Brief Description of pro jec4itiesiarsizieverovel erEN olkeqiiry NAY.0a-iS>foie useletta.hangess tar .St l ' iderohoeciptypLOCATION :5kiCorSer- O'F 7 t 7. Qetoter i 4Vr. SITE AREA :tJj 33O #I BUILDING AREA (gross) ±9 %ye DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 3 .'ff® IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : - 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Laid Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Poqulation/Employment : - ' 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : k 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation': 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENT S : Recommendation . DNSI DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : eow':e.„," ( c Title : 1 ZUD‘ . Q Date : FORM: ERC-06 T Date circulated : /C , fif Comments due : ta 2q1gi ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMIST REVIEW SHEET EC - jOl - Al APPLICA ION No (s ) . 6 OQq m I PROPONENT : Qr j1i 1 A!Wee t' PROJECT TITLE : airig7 4pppt®(I4 , Brief Description of Project : TAit I•S apprp .MI q ap etAry 1)14c.(•(i s)-16fte welettdibatirif Qr.ifiliiiktiteiberii LOCATION :SWC.orser a 22251. c ® //4ute.c e SITE AREA :ltiq 3091 BUILDING AREA, (gross ) 0;j 0i DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : arrAp IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :fr/1';/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Wader & water courses : 4 ) Plantl life : 5 ) Anilmal life : 6) Noise :_ 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : adecielarj east : War2h0US.'ni south : aufe0 40044 west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) .Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : rf 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : tr ffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : Date : FORM: ERC-06 J._ 1 Date circulated : IO(j' fg0 Comments due : 121 ,d g1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - /0/ - AI APPLICATION No (s ) • Sp"1AQ11111/ PROPONENT : #er-ii g #I 'Ck Reif I PROJECT TITLE : S1 ' j4pPRp 'i1 Brief Description of Project :Replay.' teUd r e a O Kebs ory buds .(I,9 b f r P l,o etAaet: LOCATION :$k Corse effe Ski7tS1. c Maid/ Sal SITE AREA :1:1W132;040 BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : WAD IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INF0 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 1 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : trsffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : V 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Arheology/history : COMMENT : Recommendation : NS DOS More Information Reviewed by : 1 itle : ant/Ty FHA/MEE/2 Date : 1/ 44:31 FORM: ERC-06 Revision 3/198112 1 81 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:5f r oqy-8/ SITE #9PPRov4i. . ?eq yen%AtCstte f)ase• 1 1 1rVa4S)pM.Sel a 7106eVSEdaf heSiite$Setrk okler((y/d WathelLocation: SW ISwearnerestf. IStuer.SW Applicant: Apr 4101veek de Ali L:D Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: /.2/410/9' Traf ng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: "r tilities Eng. Division 12 ire Department 1IParks Department El Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR S',UGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e_ Ire p, /, Approved EKproved with Conditions J Not Approved On St% r,'rc iyArti/ !0 to rovlvtee/ df-- e 6ficer/ l'iD/e<0its Cps 5/f`u c o o ii _ re dept aCCe55 y=0//i e a ://i2%t.e D S-7 ! ' Ldf25 !-u !tns1 ik 4tr d.. .. . , DATE w7''02/" F/ Signature of Director or Authorized- Repre - . ti ve REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: U izY ' SPY El Approved 3 A/pproved with- Conditions Not:App,r:oved S S -- °F..._s 1.. _.._..._.._ DATE: ) L1 SI Signature of Direct r or Authorized Representative 1 c,.k' "1O a qe _ 's.•w -eq Gb„ D .4,*N(L1"` C 'V 44741ff• t3 ... '.ACIk4 tit.'y " S r'' £ V A i1 r ' 6 ,p .v : '4+ ^w• •' •2[ o a p A 4 y n n, • r,' n ..r. t t,, , Fly w<q d • • l! Ia C rF• ,C..x ova• d<R.iivo x• k o t'^ , ie•".7 : `y,•i `P,_ +!R}T 4.,>.Y -k`;", 1'44%r y 1„At i,. • ', • 'p A d 'P .f t i, e , e; 9, g q F, k , p'- ‘) :} ; =41)\ egerer ..a. UTILITY APPROVAL. SUBJECT 111 •• 2-3 a' ri LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER A/0 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • WATER 3 COON. Mc SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER CON. Cliff SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHF.,RGE • WATER A/0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SclIER A/0 APPROVED WATER PLAN f.FPS; APPROVED SEWER PLAN ES APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. YES FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS ES r r. Date circulated : ! 1 / l Comments due : la t112/11 ENVIR0INMENTAL CHECKLIST RE{VIElW SHEET ECF - jOl - Al APPLICATION No (s ) . 8*'' 11' * .` PROPONENT : Ilterlen I it. iv ckde Reif PROJECT TITLE : $(1nel- j PPALMIL Brief Description of Project :f4VeitarjqedyreOjel deN cKc4ory tat S•0 a-is)idoucevialcuSafiriftertro,‘,iiiiii we ecicooc ii LOCATION S Comer^ erf S 7 th$:. c ®wei/ 14Vie•Sw SITE AREA :1:11 03044 BUILDING AREA (gross ) ±q1 4 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 31.740 IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : c 5 ) Animal life :47 6 ) No ' se : dr/ 7 ) Li ht & glare : t// 8 ) Lard Use ; north : east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 4 v9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : fric 12 ). Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends CITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : L., 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health: 18 ) Aesthetics : c/ 19 ) Recreation : v 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : T iJl-e wTi./4, ie+.'/t' 40b ..•f i c,,e- ems Ha .'a..s 3 4-I"- 4 D r r.e 21 4/ twill r h (! -( ack SsLnn s J h-a- 4:31 s-tes. • Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : )'9/ Z Title : Date :Z Z7?/ FORM: ERC-06 O Date circulated : 1040 !l t® Comments due : 'a Xq/g l1 ENVIIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEW SHEET ECF - 16/ - APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : Q,rine fieleekde iRle PROJECT (TITLE : '1yF Niihe0644L. Brief Description of Project :Ree it a''ti PlVtl tO4 eN Py bL .(411a*3ettie u eIas aleiirifte p&®e."Qr. exAw LOCATION :Skkorner- of 510 7121,51. i ///live-SW SITE AREA :1:1%133041 BUILDING AREA (gross ) ` 'qg 4Q/4 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 31.710, IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :r/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : L/ 10 ) Ris'k of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Nurrber of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :5 —1 S • traffic impacts : M 1--.) c4. et tca Tr ,-.rie,/ 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Enrgy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Huriian health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI // DOS More Information Reviewed by : 1 itle : /ya4 c 5.9.ez/.sT` Date : FORM: ERG-O6 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JANUARY 13, 1982 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING: ECF-101-81 KOERING, HOLVICK deREGT SA-094-81 WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER) - Bldgs 12-15 ECF-102-81 KOERING, HOLVICK deREGT SA-095-81 WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER) - Bldgs 1-5 OLD BUSINESS: King County LIBERTY VIEW 265-81-R & 1081-24 Proposed reclassification and plat (King County) Rezone from SR (7200) , SR (9600) , SR (15,000) to RS 7200 and RS 9600; 97 lot single-family subdi- vision with clustered lots & townhouses; property located between Talbot Road South and 102nd Ave. South (extended) south of approximately So. 168th St. (extended) . ECF-114-81 WILGEO COMPANY B-268 Application for building permit to allow construc- tion of one-story shopping center, two buildings, VILLAGE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER; property located at Bronson Way North. NEW BUSINESS: ECF-112-81 VICTORIA HILLS PHASE II PPUD-102-81/V-103-81 FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORPORATION Applications for preliminary Planned Unit Devel- opment approval of 196 dwelling unit multi- family development and variance to P.U.D. density calculation procedure on that portion with R-4 underlying zoning; property located between Benson Road South and proposed SR-515 immediately south of existing Washington Natural Gas Company plant, east of Talbot Hill Park and Victoria Park Subdivision, and contiguous to Victoria Hills Phase I, 141-lot single family subdivision. ECF-115-81 SOUTHCENTER EAST INVESTMENTS B-269 Application for building permit to allow cons- truction of two-story office building (Office Building #2) on existing paved parking lot; property located in the 700 block of S.W. Grady Way. ECF-113-81 KING COUNTY RENTON DISTRICT COURT CU-104-81 Proposed King County Declaration of Non- significance for your information and comment. King County CANDLEWOOD RIDGE 201-82-P Environmental Assessment for review: proposed PUD for 406 multiple family dwellings; property located north of S.E. Petrovitsky Road and between 148th Ave. S.E. & 152nd Ave. S.E. (if both extended) . r t" ' z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTf ©.• I RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 009 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 o 235-2540 TfO sEos - O- January 6, 1982 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Mike Selman Project Manager Holvick deRegt Koering 1 Oakmead Terrace 1230 Oakmead Park, Suite 210 Sunnyvale, California 94086 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER Dear Mr. Selman: Persuant to our telephone conversation of Monday January 4, 1981, there appear numerous issues to be resolved prior to the actual filing of the final plat and approval of site plans for the buildings in Washington Technical Center. The firm of Bush, Roed, and Hitchings has been working on the preparation of the final plat, white the firm Lance Mueller Associates has been working on the specific site designs. As result of unanticipated delays resulting from the issues of bonding and natural flood storage, the submission of the final plat to the Hearing Examiner by our office has been delayed. Regarding the final plat, two issues remain. First, the fact that the Valley Parkway, if dedicated, would require full improvements or bonding at this time, and secondly, the issue of removing natural flobd storage capacities from the subject site. The first issue may be resolved on the face of the final plat. Both the Public works and Building and Zoning Departments will recommend to the Hearing Examiner that the right-of-way adjacent to the Tracks A and B be acquired by easement, for utilities and future roadways. The Land Use Hearing Examiner does not have to concur with cur recommendation and may subsequently recommend to the City Council that the right-of-way be dedicated and bonded. The Public Works Department agrees with the concept of allowing replacement of the natural flood storage eliminated in that area that will be dedicated to the City of Renton for the P-1 detention _basin. However, the applicant needs to submit a specific proposal on how it would accomplish the replacement of this natural flood capacity prior to the City agreeing upon a specific wording to be placed on the face of the final plat. King County has already acquired a fill and grade permit to construct the detention basin between the pump station and SW Grady Way. Any construction done b> your firm in this area must correspond to those approved plans or your firm must acquire a separate special -permit for the excavation that you would be conducting. JANUARY 6, 1952 t•'AZUI TWO The processing of the final` plat,and subsequent site plan approvals become complicated in, the actual sequence. of steps to .be taken. The site plans as submitted by Lance Mueller Associates ,do not specifically follow the final plat as proposed. The site plans show common curb,. Cuts and accesses along property,. lines. . This is specifically prohibited by ,Section 4-2204.2A.1. of the Parking and Loading Ordinance for the City of Renton. This requires that the curb cut be a minimum of five (5) feet from tote property line. A specific variance request would have to be sought by the applicant to allow this. This, is not an issue if the site plan approvals were granted prior to the actual review; of the final plat-,by."the Hearing Examiner. However, if the site plans were approved in this fashion and the final plat was then processed to the Hearing Examiner it is probable, that the Hearing Examiner would deny the final plat because it could not meet this:.section requirement. Therefore, we would recommend that the final . plat be processed first . with the site plan request following along with the appropriate variance request to this section. In addition, the site plans as proposed suggesting major modification from the.original intent of the development under First Cities Equities, the railroad_ spur,;'which was anticipated to be focal point of this development, is no longer functional because.of the location of the buildings. It is not even identified on the site plan and appears to be in direct conflict with the proposed parking Scheme :for the buildings. RevieTheEnvironmental.: w Committee has :conducted their preliminary review for the site plan approvals and. ,is;":very concerned about the limitation -of the development in respect to th'e approved :EIS. The original EIS only considered,a maximum. of . thirty percent (30%) office>..in :the,,total: development: The proposed buildings to the designs suggest, that ,a .greater.: proportion of the, buildings could be .'used as office than originally covered in.the''EIS.. The building design suggests that somewhere between sixty and seventy percent could be utilized for office. space. Therefore, the Environmental' Review, ,Committee 'must _request a -traffic `analysis to consider the theoritical maximum ,of .,the:`ne.w building. design. If there. is a significant deviation from the, existing, EIS, ,a. supplemental Draft EIS will have, to be published, circulated and a Final EI,S prepared before any hearing on the site plans. We would recommend that :the processing of the final plat be completed prior to the processing of the site. plan: "This.may delay the ultimate date of construction, but it will forestall technical and possible legal difficulties in reaching the final product. If we can be of further" assi,stance'please contact me directly at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger :J. Blaylock" Zoning Adminstrator Cc: P oL. toed, lush!Roed,and.1-litchings Bob Fadden, Lance Mueller:.Assoc stes. ` s. „ • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JANUARY 6, 1982 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM APPEALS: ECF-091-81 CARNER, GARY L. AND TOM R-081-81 Appeal of final declaration of significance : application for rezone from G to B-1 to allow expansion of existing floor covering store business; property located in the vicinity of 4508 N.E. 4th Street ECF-107-81 SCHUMACHER, ROBERT R-086-81 Appeal of final declaration of significance: application for rezone from R-2 to R-3 to allow for future construction of a 9-unit apartment building; property located in the vicinity of 223 Garden Ave. South OLD BUSINESS: ECF-013-81 HOMECRAFT LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. (THE TERRACE) SA-010-81 Response from Hearing Examiner regarding ERC request for reconsideration of his decision regarding application for site approval to allow construction of 280 dwelling unit multiple family complex; property located between N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street and west of Edmonds Ave. N.E. ECF-101-81 KOERING, HOLVICK deREGT (WASHINGTON TECHNICAL SA-094-81 CENTER) Application for site approval to locate four one-story buildings (12-15) to be used as a business park or for light warehousing; property located at the southwest corner of S.W. 7th St. and Powell Ave. S.W. ECF-102-81 KOERING, HOLVICK deREGT (WASHINGTON TECHNICAL SA-095-81 CENTER) Application for site approval to locate five one-story buildings (1-5) to be used as a busi- next park or for light warehousing; property located at the northwest corner of Powell Ave. S.W. and S.W. 7th Street King County LIBERTY VIEW 265-81-R & 1081-24 Proposed reclassification and plat (King County) Rezone from SR (7200) , SR (9600) , SR (15,000) to RS 7200 and RS 9600; 97 lot single-family subdi- vision with clustered lots & townhouses; property located between Talbot Road South and 102nd Ave. South (extended) south of approximately So. 168th St. (extended) . REVIEW OF TRAFFIC COUNTS AND STORM WATER INFORMATION rm ;1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE k-471/14JANUARY6, 1982 I.pi !123 1 ; 4 1 Al 14j1LfH` 1\ LAK IINE Oil ! 1 11' k L.,WASHINGTON UNGER me/ - rmr-\ Ala; ' I' 1miiJ. MP Nr- r` ffl •- -CITY im=k • - kiiii Imo 1111111 -- mill \ \ I Irmqtyzgi !fa i 1 CAI Iv I 1 11 , "364 kal% entwine' GARNER I Millekkiiii.=, r IF SCHUMACHER r `/ HOMECRAFT4." 111111.1.- 5__ _bi 1 l',-",te r 'M:i ! • ifilets;; ii [ 1 i I:L.--; 1 r... w. , k, ILI V WASH.. TECH.. j di---- 1 1,_...-__,------_..011-110 • V ...__--,-11011 . )1 1 eikkattsi 1 1. 1iii_ imi,. ,I, 2- 10. iiiv‘4* ,1 a J. L ii..4.. ..._ _.......\_t__, fra,val.zio,„....—... i. L____ . _ i_h______. 7 11 WrileCt = lir .* ' . . f 11S ii . 41 ' Ili -, = ; 1 I IMP! N, , 1 LIBERTY VIEW i rik i A.'n' 1 I L/IT.-4.* ....% s.------\.. r--—— 1 i r7 S 1 ' I r 1= LAKE s: YOUNGS l ! ENVIRONMENTALREVIEW COMMITTEE DECEMBER 30, 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM NEW BUSINESS ECF-101-81 KOERING, HOLVICK de REGT SA-094-81 Application for site approval to locate four (4) one-story buildings (12-15) on the subject site to be used as a business park or for light warehousing; property located at the southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street & Powell Avenue S.W. ECF-102-81 KOERING, HOLVICK de REGT SA-095-81 Application for site approval to locate five (5) one-story buildings (1-5) on the subject site to be used as a business park or for light warehousing; property located at the northwest corner of Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street ECF-108-81 LINCOLN PROPERTY R-100-81 Application for rezone from P-1 and "G" to R-3 for future multiple family development of 186 units; property located on the east side of Lake Washington Blvd. N. , south of North 24th Street OLD BUSINESS ECF-095-81 LAKE TERRACE PARK ASSOCIATES (Steve Harer) R-090-81 Application to rezone site from "T" to R-3 for future development as condominiums or adult apartments; property located in the vicinity of 2100 Lake Washington Blvd. N. (Purpose is to discuss EIS consultant selection. ) ERC -ECEMBER 30, 1981 I,1r i I L., i' 4-. 1-(7-1 L 1 LAKE TERRACE PARK ASSOCIATES LINCOLN PROPERTY f LAKE OnWASHINGTON ' I ii , i'IVY• ft,AN, 11 i r---- •- * I - . w. Mit 77 i '',, ' ARAdilla=211 lir:1 14114k PPoi Re.1"---- 1'Kt4Iitt L MI ,taire#_._:1, , ir Milt L. -'‘\71/ ' 1""ii‘ilall ---' - 'W. ttl i op.' 7 1.,./--,---,...__1...-.-.----•-...- 1 1 _ i I( i/ 1 KOERING, HOLVICK de REGT \w' ' r/ KOERING, HOLVICK de REGT ! 1 ANI-t7:- .,--.),EV.i'lln \--- 4 ftap,„16LIF lrrL J`I mairouri,A. 4 : 1' t i 1911111=6" arill=-7 ' 1 ., 21. , ,Th. . t 441 li ,I IAli A fIl i I !j a 1 • CJ MillSIMI LAKE LANCE MUELLER OF 7MHS 1v O77LASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC.i'S 130 Lakeside Suite F SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO. 206 ATTENTION 325-2553 V.c)G C6L.,Po' L tY. IRE: To ter( Q Cie,..)TO k p Ia‘so C-, t 2 c'O t- c GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached Under separate cover via the-following items: Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples Specifications' Copy of letter Change order COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION Ovyfs,) SHIP, PypPL,1G/, mci 2-oul Lts1 eve A-i , A-? ) P-3, ( 1 \ c.- ) THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval For your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY•TO SIc71101.J If enclosures are not as noted, kindly not - FORM 240-2-Available from(Ae,iInc.,Groton,Mass.01450 at once. 11 A F F I D A V I T k 7 R, ' C.,) 4) ,, '' ryi\t ti p. HOLVICK deREGT &. KOERING,. .a. California corporation, declares that_ it is the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 9th day of November 19 81 , Notary Public in and for the State of California; County of Santa Clara. Name of No4ary Public) Signature • •wnerr 5 Palo..Alto Square, Suite 101 ritusneuunnumu imuuauusuuuuumruu MARY JO ALDERSON Address) NOTARY' PUBLIC—CAUFORNIA 2 `'j' PRINCIPAL'CFFICE IN SANTA CY..ARA COUNTY My Commission Expires July 25,1983 Palo Alto, California e ue anee©®a®9q sacmao na oor abaaeuu uanns City) State) 415) 493-0111 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by m and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By : Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTOP! 3- s, 651 L APPLICATION j SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE USE ONLY File No. SA- C2 y6/-S(/ Filing Date //- Application Fee $ Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name HOLVICK deREGT KOERING .I Phone 1-408-736-8533 Address 1230 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 210, Sunnyvale, California 94086 • 2 . Property location S.W. 7th and Powell Ave. S.W. , Renton, Washington 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) 4 . Number of. acres or square feet Present zoning MP 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? BUSINESS •PARK 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ° or 20° B. Parking , landscaping and . screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels)1" = 200 ' to 800 ° D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7., LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Ae` t. Rev, l-77' TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM RECEIVED AUG 2 1 1981 I.ance Mueller & Assoc. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' Application No. <Sf} -096/-8) 1 Environmental Checklist No. eC/0/— PROPOSED, date:FINAL, date: r Declaration of Significance Ei Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not, a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. - Name- of--Proponent HOLVICK deREGT & KOERING 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 1230 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 210 Sunnyvale, California 94086 3. - Date Checklist submitted November 2, 1981 4.- -Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: SPRINGBROOK TECHNICAL CENTER - BLDGS. 12, 13, 14, 15 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Construction of 4 one-story tile-up concrete building of a total square footage of 46,404. The usage of the building will be of a business park or light warehousing nature.. The buildings are being constructed as empty speculative shell structures. 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The buildings are located in an existing business park area. The present site is nearly level . The surface is grass (Covered with no sf 1-119- an!trees5 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : May, 1982 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : Flood Control - King County Hydraulics Building, Zoning, Sewer, Water, Storm Drainage, Electrical , Mechanical , City of Renton. Final plat application in progress at City of Renton under Earlington Industrial Park. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain : NO 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: NONE II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic X substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- X covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief Xfeatures? ES MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES MBE NO Explanation: (C) Some filling will occur to bring building pads to min. floor elevation 16' . (d) Site will be graded for drainage. a 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X quality?YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or X regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of floodwaters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in, any water X body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the- direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either. through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies? YES _____ NO Explanation: (b) A complete drainage system will be designed. c) Normal building usage of water will occur. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of ,flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , X microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YES MAYBE NO X d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) Some existing trees will be removed. c) New landscape materials will be introduced. 4- T' 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: New vehicle activity will occur. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MMAYBE NO Explanation: On-site lighting will be installed. 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation:Natural materials will be used during the building construction process and during building operation. 1o) Risk of 'Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population X of an area? YET— M YBE Explanation: 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Work force will come from existing population base. 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: New businesses will generate new traffic movements and a requirement for parking. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation:Normal public services will be required. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (b) New power service to the park will be required. 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 6- d,) Sewer or septic tanks?X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: _ Normal building hook-ups and services will be required. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MATTE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Existing golf course will be closed. 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X. MAYES YBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that -the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lac f full disclosure on my part. ProponentO 6...4.69.41111-DA/%::) signed)` LANCE MUELLER & ASSOC./ARCH. Agents for HOLVICK deREGT & KOERING name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • u •r receipt # CITY OF RENTON PL4NNING DEPARTMENT NAME DATE PROJECT & LOCATION Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor.1 Thank you.