No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA82-014 (2)OF J iv A. Sao THE CITY OF RENTON U , 0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 staa BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0' O t Q 94TFD SEP1E10 October 1, 1982 4 Mr. Loren Davis Holvick deRegt Koering 1818 Westlake North Seattle, WA 98109 Re: Appeal of Holvick deRegt Koering SA-094-81, SA-095-81 and V-014-82 Dear Mr. Davis: The Renton City Council , at its regular meeting of September 20, 1982, considered the Planning and Development Committee report concerning your appeal . The City Council affirmed the July 16, 1982 decision of the Hearing Examiner and found no error in fact or law. The Council also determined not to consider any new evidence that could have been available at the time of the hearing before the Land Use Hearing Examiner. However, the Planning and Development Committee felt the requirement for installation of traffic signals prior to the issuance of the building permit pursuant to the site plan approval would not be feasible. The City Council concurred in the modification of Condition No. 2 of both site plans as follows: Condition No 2: Deferral of improvements with appropriate bond executions of contracts for installation of signals and issurance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and Southwest Seventh Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. Council has determined that, in order to obtain occupancy permit for this site, you must either obtain deferral of improvements with the appropriate bonding or have completed installation of signals pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. Mr, Loren Davis Holvick deRegt Koering October 1, 1982 Page 2 If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E, Motor Acting City Clerk MEM:j km ill 7 v AMENDED PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT September 20, 1982 TO : Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Appeal by Holvick DeRegt Koering SA-094-81, SA-095-81 and V4114-82 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of Holvick DeRegt Koering from the decision of the Hearing Examiner in the above mentioned matter dated July 15 and 16 , 1982. Finding no error in the requirement for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way, and Hardie and S .W. 7th Street, as a condition of the site plan approval, the Committee recommends that the City Council affirm the decisions of the Hearing Examiner. The appellant has requested that the Committee consider additional traffic study evidence from appellant ' s consultant . However, the Committee finds that the evidence could have been available at the hearing before the i, Hearing Examiner upon timely request by the appellant . Therefore, the Committee recommends that no new evidence be considered by the Council . 11However, it appears that the requirement for installation of of the buildingpermittrafficsignalspriortoissuancepursuant to the site plan approval is not feasible . Therefore , the Committee recommends that Conditions No . 2 of both site plan approval decisions be modified to read as follows : No . 2. Deferral of improvements with appropriate bond, executions of contracts for installation of signals and issuance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and S .W. i' 7th Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department .PI fe--# 6/ )---e6)-' II ilkl?re')'y j; jr r J c ,c)-" n i I J Renton City Council September 13, 1982 Page 3 AUDIENCE COMMENT continued Mandatory Ms. Taylor addressed the Council and reiterated her complaints Garbage Service as stated in her letter. Mayor Shinpoch explained that every continued bidder on the city' s garbage contract submitted their estimates •. based on all residences in the city and, in order to provide service to the citizens, all citizens must be included. M. L. Gibson, 1215 North 28th Place, agreed with Ms. Taylor' s objections to mandatory garbage service and suggested unified I demands by cities would require companies to submit "per residence" bids. Mayor Shinpoch explained reduced garbage rates and the addition of a one-can rate for those needing limited service. I Holvick deR_t Loren Davis, Holvick deRegt Koering, requested that the Planning Koering Appeal and Development Committee report be advanced. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SA 094-81 SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS SA 095-81 AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. VC114-82 CARRIED. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill submitted a committee report recommending Council affirm the Hearing Examiner decisions of July 15 and 16, 1982 , regarding installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell land Grady Way, and Hardy and SW Seventh Street as a condition of the site plan approval . The Committee also recommended that no Inew evidence be considered by the Council since all evidence could have been available at the hearing before the Hearing Examiner upon Atimely request by the appellant. The Committee did recommend that Condition 2 of both site plan approval decisions regarding require- ment for installation of traffic signals prior to issuance of the building permit be modified as follows: No. 2 Executions of contracts for installation of signals and issuance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for instal- lation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and SW Seventh Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. IMOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT.** 1 Councilman Reed questioned the lack of time restriction on actual installation of traffic lights. Following discussion, it was MOVED 1_BY ROCKHILL. SECQNDED_.BY_REED. TO ACCEPT THE AMENDMENT OFFERED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY TO WIT: FOLLOWING "NO. 2" - THE DEFERRAL OF IMPROVEMENTS WITH APPROPRIATE BONDING OR THE INSTALLATION OF SIGNAL:- WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT. CARRIED. **Original motion as amended: CARRIED. Garbage Pickup Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, commended the present garbage Commendation/ collection firm for its fees, neatness, quietness and observation Mandatory Leash of traffic flow on Mill Avenue South. Mr. Webb also criticized Law Enforcement the enforcement of the mandatory leash law and suggested repeal of the leash law if it is not to be enforced. Councilman Stredicke requested the record reflect that there had been a death of the animal control officer, and recommended strengthening the manpower to more than the current one animal control officer for next year ' s budget. Mayor Shinpoch left Council Chambers at 10:00 p.m. and did not return for remainder of meeting. Mandatory Leash Karen Lunder, 506 Stevens Court NW, agreed with all comments re- Law Enforcement garding lack of enforcement of the mandatory leash law and suggestec additions to the animal control office to supply personnel for more than eight hours a day, weekdays only. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDE[ BY REED, SUBJECT MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR REPOR1 BACK BY BUDGET TIME. CARRIED. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council August 27 , 1982 FROM: Planning and Development Committee Appeal by Holvick DeRegt Koering SA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and V 4)14-82 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of Holvick DeRegt Koering from the decision of the Hearing Examiner in the above mentioned matter dated July 15 and 16 , 1982 . Finding no error in the requirement for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way , and Hardie and S .W. 7th Street , as a condition of the site plan approval , the Committee recommends that the City Council affirm the decisions of the Hearing Examiner . The appellant has requested that the Committee consider additional traffic study evidence from appellant ' s 11 consultant . However , the Couuuittee finds that the evidence could have been available at the hearing before the Hearing Examiner upon timely request by the appellant . Therefore, the Couunittee recommends that no new evidence be considered by the Council However , it appears that the requirement for installation of traffic signals prior to issuance of the building permit pursuant to the site plan approval is not feasible . Therefore , the Committee recommends that Conditions No . 2 of both site plan approval decisions be modified to read as follows : No . 2 . •Executions of contracts for installation of signals and issuance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and S .W. 7th Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department . I 1 1 UILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 1 PUBLIC HEARING JULY 13, 1982 APPLICANT: HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING FILE NUMBER: SA-094-81 / v- CwY- t32 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks Site Plan approval for construction of four (4 ) one-story buildings ( 12-15) to be used as a business park or for light warehousing. Also sought is a Variance to permit joint access driveways on common property lines. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: Holvick, deRegt & Koering 2. Applicant: Holvick, deRegt & Koering 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) Southwest corner of Powell Avenue i! S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. 1I' h 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 3. 36 acres. 6. Access :Via S.W. 7th Street Powell Avenue S.W. 7. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing -Park. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on July 2, 1982, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on July 2, 1982. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No. 1745 of April 14 , 1959, and rezoned from "G" to M-P by Ordinance No. 3344 of August 17, 1979. i PRELIMINARY REP TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT . KOERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE TWO D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The subject site is basically level. 2. Soils: Woodinville Silt Loam (Wo) . Permeability is moderately slow. There is a seasonal highwater table at or near the surface. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard unless flood protection is provided. This soil is used for row crops, pasture and urban development. 3. Vegetation: The only vegetation on site consists of scrub brush, grass and weeds. 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject site (July 2, 1982) . 6. Land Use: The subject site was part of a golf course but is being prepared for future office and warehousing uses. Similar uses are to the east of the subject site while the property to the south and west is also being prepared for storage uses. The property to the north remains undeveloped. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are a combination of warehousing, storage and office park uses. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer : Twelve-inch water mains extend east-west on S.W. 7th Street and north-south on Powell Avenue S.W. with a ten-inch sanitary sewer also located on Powell Avenue S.W. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Not applicable. 4. Schools : Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturing Park District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June 1976 . 2. Policies Element, Comprehensive Plan (1981 ) . I. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Construction on the site will remove the vegetation, disturb the soils, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the vicinity. Through proper development controls and procedures, however, these impacts can be mitigated. E'RELIMINARY REPORT T 'HE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE THREE 2. Population/Employment: Some increase in employment opportunities may be expected. 3. Schools : Not applicable. 4. Social: Minor. 5. Traffic : The proposed development will increase traffic in the vicinity by approximately 1 , 640 average daily trips. J. ENVIRONMENTA. ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a Memorandum of Concurrence was issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee in January, 1982. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6. City of Renton Policy Development Department. L. DEPARTMENT A ALYSIS: 1 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site and the present zoning of M-P, Manufacturing Park. 2. The proposal is to construct four (4) buildings totaling 46 ,400 square feet on proposed Lot 8 of Washington Technical Center. The applicant proposes that up to 30% of the floor space will be utilized for office with 70% remaining for light industrial uses. The site plan as presented show parking along the perimeters of the lot adjacent to Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street with the loading areas contained within a court yard. The proposal utilizes common access drives along the southern and western property lines. The applicant has applied for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (A) ( 1 ) which requires the driveways not be closer than five (5) feet to any property line. Applying Section 4-722 (G) (3) it can be determined that the variance is warranted as follows : HARDSHIP: The first criteria requires that a hardship exists as a result of size, shape, topography, or location to surroundings. The size and shape of a lot created in a manufacturing park is a direct result of the industrial function and the market. In this specific case, a 300 x 400 lot is proposed and will consist of approximately 120, 000 square feet. This is a small to medium sized industrial lot. Many of the new industrial lots farther to the south have buildings located on them which are 100, 000 to 200,000 square feet in size and the lots are 4+ acres in size. The function of any industrial PRELIMINARY REF r TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREG7 « KOERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE FOUR park is to maximum the coordination between adjoining internal uses. Section 4-2204 ( 2) (C) (1 ) states that there shall not be more than two driveways for each 330 feet of street frontage on property under unified ownership or control. This clearly shows an attempt to limit access. The applicant is proposing to limit access more by controlling and encouraging on-site circulation. Therefore, strict application of size and the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicant the original functional intent of an industrial park. MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL: Reducing the access points onto major streets would limit the potential points of conflict with traffic flowing on those streets and from a design point of view, it should be encouraged. In actuality, the proposal would ultimately reduce the curb cuts by 50% and would not create a detrimental impact upon the adjacent properties or general public. SPECIAL PRIVILEDGE: The Parking and Loading Ordinance specifically disallows the creation of a common curb cut; however, in the next section it specifically encourages , though indirectly, close consideration of curb cut locations . This consideration in the past has allowed the City in the case of Koll Industrial Park (Files SA-269-78 and FP-362-79) to allow a uniform cohesive development serviced by common curb cuts and access easements. In addition, the Sunset Square proposal (File SA-104-80) allowed joint use, parking and access easements for the development of a shopping center. This would suggest that in cases of coordinated, comprehensively planned commercial or industrial facilities that a variance should not be considered a special priviledge. It would be considered a functional necessity and a reasonable decision. In some cases, the buildings were originally designed to function independently but based upon the market and eventual sales of the property, the buildings function together as an industrial complex. This is the present case of the Benaroya portion of Glacier Park Development along S.W. 43rd Street. In that particular case, curb cuts have been eliminated, security fences installed and access limited to common driveways and gatehouses. MINIMUM NECESSARY VARIANCE: The applicant' s proposal would reduce the number of curb cuts by 50%. The variance request is the minimum necessary to allow this reduction to happen. However, each site plan review should consider the functional acceptability of placing a common curb cut on a property line. In the case of the western property line, the thirty (30) feet utility and access easement is actually reserved to allow future rail access to the site. Allowing a curb cut at this location would appear to conflict with that ultimate intent. PRELIMINARY REPORT 'I„ 2HE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE FIVE The Building Division advises that other parking variances maybe necessary as a result of the statements that all parking must be on-premise parking. A parking space does not function by itself . Necessary access aisles must be provided. In the case of sharing a common curb cut, access is then joint and provisions for joint access easements should be provided. Granting of the curb cut variance along with the requirement to provide joint access easements should be sufficient to address this issue. 3. The primary natural issue accompanying the development of this entire site has been the question of present and future flood water storage. The prelimary plat required dedication of sufficient area to construct the fore-bay for the P-1 Channel together with the Environmental Review Committee' s decision to require the applicant to construct sufficient storage to mitigate any filling of the subject site. This primary issue appears to have been resolved. However, final resolution will not occur until the final plat is recorded and the property is transferred to the City of Renton. Therefore, any site approval should be conditioned upon filing of the final plat. 4. A secondary major issue surrounding the development of the subject site has been traffic generation. The Manufacturing Park Zone would allow all types of development ranging from light industrial through all office. Surprisingly, the heaviest anticipated use would be the light warehousing according to the ITE manual generating 50 trips per 1 , 000 square feet. The EIS prepared suggests a maximum of 30% office over the entire development which would anticipate that one complex may be all office and another complex might be all industrial. In any case, the focus comes back to the two "choke points" that limit access to the general area. The Environmental Review Committee specifically included participation in the traffic signals at S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. in the amount of 20% and improvements in the intersection of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way in the amount of 35% with the additional requirement that the developer construct the extension of S.W. Powell Avenue. The Enviromental Review Committee in issuing the Memorandum of Concurrence for the site approval stated clearly that "the intersection of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way will be unsafe until the intersection is signalized. Therefore, Powell Avenue can not be open to Grady Way until the signalization is completed to City standards. " This is a simple statement which is not a requirement of the Environmental Review Committee. Even though the initial two site approvals probably would not generate sufficient traffic levels to warrent the installation of the traffic signal, it seems inconsistent to require that Powell Avenue be extended prior to the development of Phase 1 , but not be open for public use. The matter could be resolved by requiring the applicant to install the traffic signal and then have him seek a latecomer' s agreement from adjacent developments. PRELIMINARY REP( TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT KOERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE SIX In the case of the intersection at S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. , those improvements are presently included in the bond which the applicant has submitted to allow filing of the final plat. However, a bond is a very tenuous instrument to proceed against and the cash should be available to allow the City to develop that intersection at this time. The City has currently designed the revisions for that intersection and has other property owners within the general area committed to proportionate shares in that signalization cost. 5. The applicant has provided 102 parking spaces for the subject site. The 46 ,404 square feet of building space (30% office and 70% warehousing) would require exactly 102 parking spaces. However, the 13 spaces provided on the west side of Building No. 15 cannot be considered permanent because they are adjacent to an access easement which would provide for future rail extension to the plat. Elimination of these 13 spaces would reduce permanent parking to 89 spaces and reduce the maximum allowable office development within these four buildings to 23% of the total volume or 10, 675 square feet. To assure that no more than 23% of the building floor area can be developed for office, restrictive covenants should be filed limiting total office space on Lot 8 to require a new site plan approval if the 10, 600 square feet of office space is exceeded. Primary intent of the restrictive covenants is to notify any future owner that there is a limitation on development on the site unless there is additional City review. It should be pointed out that at some point the buildings may become all office in nature and there may be sufficient area if the interior court designated for loading area was redeveloped into parking lots. 6. The Fire Department advises that all fire hydrants should be installed prior to construction. 7. The landscaping plan meets the intent of the original presentations for the preliminary plat, but lack an irrigation system required by City code. M. DEPARTMENT RECO DATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the variance request, V-014-82, be approved subject to the condition that joint access easements be filed on all affected property lines as they are approved by the Hearing Examiner after site plan approval. Approval of the site plan request, SA-094-81 , subject to the following: 1 . Filing of the final plat for Washington Technical Center. 2. Signalization of the intersection of S.W. Grady and Powell Avenue S.W. prior to occupancy. 3. Filing of restrictive covenants requiring site plan approval at the time office space exceeds 23% of the total 46 ,404 square foot building area or 10, 675 square feet. 4. Require payment of participation (35%) in signal improvements to S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. within 60 days after issuance of building permits . x '',/=•// ti ' e/-/k It • ..,, ijoit-.-r- " "-////// h71tAoL . 1 ifigZ. . , /0141/ ! 14 1 kt R N ihilit • 8 414 N,,\, ss‘,\ Ilisdif144isI:t.... isp if _ it bib geta 60 f R S• Zstrii gitgtOY Weep • 41 *14%., .1 - • 4CPT/441! C.-/C,,t1: • 7 4•Vi" vite#P - 6404(1414V.414 4144 b • . .41 7 p„Il 4.-41;e . 411/1 _ ke4 f* •k e 44.!i, t,.\., lifiet ii, grif: -.ii-- __Is!b•IP pq0 ail PI i 4:1It66\ I i R_y _ r 1 , 0149 WIll—-- -? :1 J.W.7 7-1 I s1:,, Zt*, _.--"-i -- a' 2` > t,Vl L 4 I 1 i 1. i— ;•• Z HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING SA-094-81 BUILDINGS 12 , 13 , 14 & 15 WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER i t APPLICANT Holvick , deRegt & Koering TOTAL AREA ± 3 . 36 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Powell Ave . S . W . & S . W. 7th Street EXISTING ZONING M-P , Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Vacant/Golf Course PROPOSED USE Industrial Park COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS Ili alzlll RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Ai pli.cati.on : 5i—P1y-R1-- SITE IIAPPR_0094..,_Re. 1( lvle o!e- Ng th11 is 1 S 0$51_/io4e vseiai4 40SiArS5 -_ i or o dilit Aq Lccation:7e4,51. 4-Wive It ) (i'vaii Ai'pl i cant : TIITII. traeL'i i liolVeek de Apili. 0:QPublic ' ks Department. ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:1.2M C1Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DAZE: ""'""" DUti cities Eng. Division Fire Departmen, jParks Department t__! Bui l di nq Department Po ice Department 0 Others: . . . . COMMENTS OR :W66ESTIONS RL: ARI)l A; '.;'1'l S APPLICATION ;;llo;;r D B1: PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1.3Y 5 : 00 P .M. 5_02_1017/2_0_ _ ______ _' INC, DLP\RT 1EN1'i'DIVISIVN : E ppprovod eikApproved with Condi t i ons n Not Approved b re. . J / h S /'ic.7i, AiCC e,1 t,e_ 6-e ik - //..' ,v-.' - eh.., 74....7dwr • 4.,d- ' ,e.. ..4-00- ci Na"-t e va l r--e.J jV DAfE : / ! 2. L/ 1 gna t,.1-? of Di l'L or or Auth rl ze Iiepr'esentoti vt' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: c ire I_0, f, Approved EKIpproved with Conditions 0 Not Approved 0/i Si C' r, •r- c ky7 a•,/3 /0 e traL ',. Br/ e Wow fr/or 1 o, a 1,r. c cf)er 1, a cc ti 55 /O 1e• l-d V X eo/ a/ -41-7 e d cm C 0154 e-l DATE: '/- / Signature of Director or Authorized Repro. ,n ( tive i OF I A. THE CITY OF RENTON z N .. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 silL IMMO e. w. BARBARA Y. SHINt'OCH. MAYOR s POLICE DEPARTMENT 90 co- HUGH R.DARBY, CHIEF 4)4,, SE PT O P CITY OF REHION ME MORA NDU riW DEC3 ° 19 TO: The Environmental Review Committee FROM: Lieutenant D. R. Persson g!,!,O RE: Springbrook Technical Center After reviewing both applications for site approval in the Springbrook Technical Center, I find that both requests will have a substantial impact on the Renton Police Department's operation. As I am sure you are aware, the Renton Police Department requested six additional officers for 1982. This amount of officers was necessary to meet the increasing demands placed upon the police department by the general public. The six positions were denied in the 1982 budget, which means that we cannot continue to offer the same level of service to the citizens of Renton if building is allowed to continue without additional help for the police department. Naturally the impacts that a development such as this will place on the department can be mitigated to some extent by proper building methods. These methods include but are not limited to such things as proper placement of outside lighting; burglar alarm systems; security windows, doors, and locks. Another major concern of this development is the traffic that will be generated. At the present time we have a traffic situation at Southwest 7th and Hardie that is unbelievable. Everyone agrees that a traffic signal is necessary at this intersection, however, the signal and funds for the signal do not appear to be present or even available in the immediate future. This development will further impact this particular intersection as well as the intersections of 7th and Lind, 10th and Lind, Lind and Grady Way, as those intersections will be the major access points to the new development. Therefore, it is my suggestion that this development not be allowed until : 1 There is a signal at 7th and Hardie. 2 Powell Avenue Southwest be completed all the way through to Grady Way, and the intersection at Grady Way and Powell be signalized. 3) The intersection at Lind and Grady Way be improved; some fairly inexpensive improvements .at the intersection of Lind and Grady can be accomplished which would greatly enhance the traffic flow on a short term basis. Because of the above reasons, I strongly urge a declaration of significance be issued on this project. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: g; Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE:J2 -ZZrzPSt ` !r e of Di roc o-r or AL th ri zed Repro gen La ti v --- ate. ..-ems MMIIIMMINIII 7-77 tI H H H IH H i) // t 7i s All W/ U.....„,..) wsTM J Z ,tr.4'1 I M/14 - c.OM s... N.‹,/,' ' ILI 1--- O. emir.Perraots ha CIty:Whore to be ohratiohl wrier CD IClei por IA 0 Who. hies.Whist.hall h awn,.Or....1hi 1,\.„v„' ' 1•-•`' ii*Vitt r. A -'r ..1 7,:c"....:'" 1;10.1:40•010‘.•'"berc710 com:laTnitn'ilr7:1:372e.:"'‘ F. Swale.bendlih.he el chenshele Ilhials ow ArtIch h. MV ii '1 1: ,1,,,i7.17,.ciiii,iiii:::::':-....,,,:yzt.77.: ::,.I 9' b.. ' WeYM>aa. oe 1 p u K. .` tp TUKWI A .,,. J a tqHIMITS 3 1 0 .««.« n...," ,.. a..,.«.++n N IRENTONJIB , a,.,«,.y r. 1:11rilZe.q:91,".."i'''.'"'"'"Il'''''''"*"WO he prior to vlcwYv enw hilt thiohr to yeah',......«.....oil Moho prior, w«,«to hill rfli=—..- ' a. z.,••=.1=•:.:1;-----.-...T..:--"T..,-,. r Contrhtor to hook.all wart.whoa..anal oshrials ilstoh.maw.eloctrical and hear hymns hash thlaih w j:: a.«m. ..W. I094-81 mow./ 1 i rr s- ...ram arrs n 1'i 1t v I 3 L i_._1 OE•V PLAN r 4.W. beVCNTM AVE" w.... us.L aV _ t' 11 wI li W IPaj a."_ T,ro,. OW NMI iiII 4 II 2''' r ..1 u 1 1 imi w'u-":: is eu, C c w«.a.y QCL?Z MrAll— I --3-"•+`+ yi' I 4 W IP.M 44110: I//MKS nottl wUl4 _4•,' kAVt I L . M.t•. -• L'.ww r-i .1-,.. . __` -: U V u?.,Wu.loa v (wa ro,nnr ura)tit,s.ns. c . •+ aoIISera* 0 1. b t C twwµ3 I. I 1 mTnlI WILDING••i.I 1. I I Si 11 IiL' M4.' Y t R'... 10. ,,, _, a,. ago '3'--1 ail 1 a ,p•a.• .. t 3 F 1 . 11.,..1 CN•MtNT IIII Et_5„SA—094-81 el re PLAN fSLDG.S •12.15 LzL 1 411 a. V-014-82 t A 2 mot. 1.. ,,., r........c,...), 1 5- • V EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION Id...,lie . r..• ,,.. r ef. .. JLU4 r u•••..•_...•... .... ,....••....._..........-'.._: G) 4 m..ems _WEST EI.f NATION 4sOUTH CI,CVATION a i 4 C p a i L U W F- Y 3`, 0 gi C CI I 1 woos ow.sr a i `© 3 • a e e V "....•...... 00,4 ,••,.... '""". sY r V-014-82 LOOK rLAn _ A JJ .,r•' VW•c.o.. LOG. 16 3 1 i.7 • 7..'......7.1.1:=A Cr".".• - I. 11.* _vm, 7: • .. 1 1.•"=•-lz•,-. Ij i. eAsT eLeVATtoN 1"....",..,=.,:„...—.— — - NORTH eLeVATIoN6.8".• I/O. .. 8'-.... Ii•k0.4.1. t„._---,•-.--.''''' • • [ •-.,.... . 1„........ ....,,...) ,. .. g1•S' t47.. f'.15* Nt, • „.-.' 11..1,..dWan.1 1WW1i0 ei-,.I 47 was.....t••••)--"art7 . n n_ WS*7 ELEVATION SOUTH et-eVATioN III t tI11.1l„,,,,. 5.51!1•4TA.1 S. r i ' • ' ) "1,1 it. 4"Lii,...1 i 1 CC U. '. '."*" i N • • , let\ /,---:• I M.-Ina 1 •a-,trr.- . :1 ,-,—,....• it*pi _4_: • 131' Li ....._____L i 1 1 1 I -, t 1, •• SI el 1 a-t" t I i t 1t 416-- L r••r• V I i1.1.011.10•1•L AMMO..7 ••••••••- : ' i litAtt I i 1i 0 r Ir....---...„ II4II I0. 03 i I 1 u.4...„.... i, I morn I 0 li I- • ' is' gr,,.. 441..... 00.,0.SA-094-81 i.. , . III V-014-82 CS 11.L 1 Ci) rL_oorz. FLAN A IN L1301. 1 IR rVP ON& 111 CA46T CL.0 VAT I oN TM NORTH ELEVATION M..•.f• 1/• 1'-• T.I•..w ran Mac TR rva*v.*+w r..nee••••..w 3 wow. i.e... I 1-1 r. f M.uw p•.•• M'-ram .__+- +M•• a. . ... WtST ELEVATION I t I f SOUTH cLEVATION 1,1 ` ' .1--_ I 7• Y. si 1i y Fi L r1 i a ! I i li I mi f ; le a I e e fi—• r iI{ 1 i T r o . o 094 81 i., . LIV-014-82 W FLGbIC r N p 3 O NORTH lIT: TION w...J 4,0 4i#y. •.• w.•..•: •...,• * k•-r /r_• 1 r 1 - ri• .H - • - ( .ri _ . .......• . WEST E EVATION I n i J1 et 1 j I ; , ' 3 1TIONL.»..*•.-....•`I I t SOUTH ELEVA moili 1 I wilinsomium®Ill lfllll I i. Y:. l 4 _ p. i. EAST ELEVATION mm 1 r s F "x1 - • i i Li1_____. _.] i i. J r,a r: f iI i i i 1 4 IF ,1••• 4. 4. *Nu.mi. •••40 *0 SA-094-81 LV-0 14-82 b O O FLAIR PLAN . r " ELoo. 14 3 14 I i'. 1.:G-..-•, ••;!. .-3 L_/ ;:E;4 7""mn." 17 1 4---' I 1 .i-1113 .--lo. J. 1 Me 1.T. e IMERIIIIIIII wall. 111111.1 le 041Vm040 00040 MOM ENEME 01.0446 00.• SIVE 1 i 1w MP MAO AMMETICM•14. ••••••••06. 0 t a. 4,a.c.......• al .......„7......., ........ M.MAIM TIMM Ilk cv.v...,014m MEEMACMI.V.-PM- L' E'. I •-00. (---- OM-- ------ •••••••11, In -__J .,:iiii? f.._.,, •'---- =IVA ...C•V 1.1.010• CAL.• IZEIC 111111=k •11.61% . c1+, 4. v yap...... rig MINIM; 11.1111117 • 01 v..,.11, vt i.•-we ta.r... imomirrai el. lifil 4111 X 5 4 pi , . ......,... c 6•10.1101.11.40 Ib CAM.11...a•1.0,••V.,Sac 04 410 I v.....I, re II 1 ma.cus•No 1 1! R 1806.- [ ti 1 Ill a 1 141.1 1 I I 1 IIHII) ,...,......... U.,‘ . '.- ewv...• 4'. ilmr".•.3.0.061.14. ri 111.10••It I 404.4‘ W i 11 . 4 1-t-G.E.:CN_ J 1as•n.4 15 AO SP MilserreinellO IMMO MIER MIPMEMPE MMY.10 LITIMMONT.••erne mem e.........I. • .to i • a._ .........410.0101 0110100.1 POMPOM MM.•g•••\.111W111,•••110•0 s 4ke • . - r" MITIMARIM MMTAMM114 C0 MIMI'MCP MOM 01.40.640 NOMErOW.1111.1":111.,••••••171 I 11tii8M84: 111101 „, a I 11•40111.1•Re I I II446-44 g .. or...4.1 10 ' 1 ......al. 2 3 1 111.1•111111/4T LocJernota maws 4r... Ir 40.11,1_311,[1(.41.2.14 L•El lb...bm k° J t.aL,..nonn.MOM M.ACCOMMI.1.•11.6•01 MICiFICATIONI TM ANIIIMPRO.PIANIC•01111.COMMTECTIOM AMMO.T.MITEMT. min.ANIMCM Mt/C MR. AIM(iAl M.MT IMITAT AM CITY Of M.TIMMS.IsawV.1.11. 1 AA. • Jlacer&0“.I 1 MEM.MOM/001101 PM M.Th.ti0M1100 111i TTTTTTT 10/COMICTIOTIIKIt TTTTT.11.40.MIT.1111MT b.'"". I pi R R 18V 1 s' IA' I I 1 . me • MOM TTTTT M.MT MTMITEITML MM.MEM.M. IACiL.1111.11.1 III.MUTTON AIM TO MIMEO.11.0 E 1 I , Elf I. 2 COMMALMOM AM MIT M MINTAINE0 WA CMISTIPICTIM MD LAITOMPIR MI MM..410 TNII POTEIM1.1 PM 6.-11111 0110.nex MM..8 al IIi 1.„,,.::,•...._ i 0 1:,.n..T.:,.......,......„....,......7.n,,..„,1313 61,,,,TZT.Z0 CORRECT LOCMION DO M CIE AAAAA 001.44 011 M111:14 M. 11, lig 7. i......1 ...-1, ‘,...z....,. le •R.A MICIMIAPICTIM CONFIRM.MO A IC EOM WM MIL OS V. wvi .------.• Ma.A..ha cme op I , Mm/Mil 10110 TO ITARTIM 11111 MITIOMIM.If 1.41.14AL..er- " i 100 10.4 e. 01 COMIACTINIES IMMONSIOILF.10 MM.an Net Win 111M. 111111WWW111111111 '. • irlf.J1`.j ‘‘. IMMO PAM TO MAIM 001110.011041.IT MALL NM COMMMORM MICONS11111111 10 401116.14.MAI. 4L".4"---47•01- 1;; M--- 1° 111111JAMTLI 77.....".*4M.'.... 1111!\ l''/ (. 4' VI= " 411 1 n."...: 4% 1111.1.11MIST PI OM 111 AMAMI OE MCRIFLI.TM M CI r Ili. CITOMMT IOC 1.1140•1 0.A.PIM MAU.4 MOM,MOM MOM MTV COCCI...011 MM C-E6.11 OM 16 M.MLICITIM MEL AAAAA MINT i MIMI COMO 11.TO M.41110MCM MICA I= i COMMTIO Al.PIM MTN 100 110.011116 MM. pa. I I1.MIDINO MR STORIT MI.PIP.SM.111 MM.",MS MIA SIMMITO PLA.NO.41 IFT•011.1.PM 4 INMAS MOP PM. - __. 41 . 1 l IMES IIII.O.PETI TO SPRINOLIM F011 AAAAA SO 111.4.OM 4100..1..11..1,04 400.:(kit Ar11.11:•111.1.o.,(11.llllllllll 1114.0.1„I.,...,CLAN•••IY•M.00...1611MVTIM.04 1101.WU, I 1,-...tt:, I MEM PIPE TO SPRIMINII.1104 MC PIM.1 MM.IMAM M COARIED TO II 1NMS MOT.TOP Of P..IN 6 11014 i Irlllll10.01.MMACTUT. 1.TA.IMPICTIM I.4.101001P004•40.011.41.SEIM LIM. 10.TIMM MTN MIA 111 4111604 MAIM 00 10/.TIMM MI I IPIPEOIAMTIRFM.INCITIS 401C11.1.II 10 lllll.IMMILL MALL M POMO MAW OR OM SIMS elf TM PIM IN•MY LAMS MIAMI.TO M If MAXIMO MM.. 1 tt g/r.:1:21:0=ZATraft."4=1ATIE.71642.11;TP. 60 GOMM MAP. 1..MIA FM MAIM SHALL 01 atilt LIM NMI"MON 11=0*";::IrtOrATLOZO.1==LOLF:Iri="STLI"PrTTM:11m:nr. PITA COMMIT TO.1.1 MCIFICATION.A-IIMI-1.76 011 MARIST CATM M61110014 A MINIMUM COM OF OPM FOOT MO A 14110411.04 SL PAP SIAl COATM STIrtg1411:10%•?7-:TP:r1rOM.'"'"IOFOMIMPICMT. RIMS1011.PIPE MIMS TO OE POIN-0.OR RICIMNIML 401M. MAIM TO 04 CM.C.All lllll MINS III IMPAS PM 0trAVOIVT=VM;TR llllllll ClieC:=417:=7"*."'"*"'" IMAM TO OA llllll A MIMI.COMM OF M IMES. O1‘002.4":0111:1::::1:1C"AlOrrItl7r/A:111:. A-11•11•1111 OR 001.1011.Mt FITT..MIMS TO 04 pMICHANICAL1011110.FLAMM.1,0140 MIMS MALL.1 MAIM IN ACCOMMICE VITO PAM•ICI MO MALL B.IM LC Id COM I MOM 1041•• MA•4...41,, ".'At'alngs.:11:1:1 r.t:41,:INTILI:"4.1,:l«l:::;:.:''i L 1MOTN.MMINOTON MALT.IMPARIMIT.All PRISSMI TIMING MALL M OM 111 MC MM.Of A 111.111.llllll IIESA-0 9 4-8 1 Of MI CITY OF MM.CITOTMCTOM TO MOVIM PLUM MO 8niiTEMORMT111.00.01.M.61••MS FOR 110.1.AM MIT. KY.PI NU MOM TO FITA4 T11-111.i V V0 1 4-8 2 i.,11.1 IS.INSTALLATION OF CORPORATE STOPS.MIT."MIMS.LIM.MO MTMS TO.1.ACCOMLIMED ITT TM CITY OF IMMIT.ALL CONNECT.TO EXIIIIN4 MAIM Ill RI ACCORPLIME0 IT TN.CI TT IL C. OF MN.,ALL MCISSART EXCAVATION M.MIMI."TO III LAI 1101;is 1.11101“....L.S.VC...I.• SUMAC.V ME CONTRACTOR MO 111 01.1.1.PRIOR TO MTV 1NOTIPICATION. 1111Eie, _ i t,L Md K"TM '" C GENERAL NOTES L71, r` fri•`.F r _ A i:.. ' . v sro..'°..' r,.awway.wa w.e Ow WO....w..s w j wnsiss pwraw aww,w.n k,y 1(I' war.w a.+a...r1.a fcw cT ow+rw... A _w 4t0A WK.,Y A....Y.A..w N A4.AAr*N.ab,MM N. wnywitirrito 0),Irowle8,, .1 . Y..r.., I It! PLAN v M YAM MM.W as N 9MG i M.O. 1 Yi. O!u....i NOW). a A.. I w 51 r r re«tnc,..e..ww.r,..rre o..r.. o. u.w.aa.a..WOO Osn..r«V.........•II- r Ig i wnA.....r.+aA a w+ew wn.r....M.wN, Q C r D RAM q.Awrm.c Aa Aa.w..ws-MLN.MM.&II 7Z•NDYM®..AGZ.a+O.tW.Y.AAN.Y• i svw..r s+-• r•m„•" rnawwM...wsDtcy.0tow.D P......w,....D N y1fw.,. W i awn..\.yr i., r. . T....- \. or H w-om..s,..r,.r..,,n le ici. 1 I I TYflDiMR.*, .w,..w., 1 41,D.L D.,L PF TIrt AL41C CI,SXt. rn..rr lT 4111- ^' uL. Ai.\-o 11! 0 fI I 4R4140\1RA_"21V Y•lf_ fi OM w.Yr.MW,W o r EG.' . .0.a.co w..0..., 4 y <at.ii.1 s _ e: '" i e.o»... ii s t9`v.:.1w 0 m V .pig. ' m n 51. .MI A - Eli LANDSCAPE PLAN a o F. e1:110 r w. _..., l/ r — w PLANT SCHEDULE Al U4` R 4.04110.- i m n.. .,._ a .r11, ". . _ 7ess0a, — I'a xr... ....w.' ....... ..« a a w_• o.o p 111 .-- tar .._ -_.. may'1 ,R N xnA.4 M -"M3- w.. v-.,:..e.e O . wowo w....,.,. e.....p-eo....0 ea.,a ur....s a,a...............a-..,...,.1<e...5 n:-a...0 n w . w 5..e.. . L .—...,.,.. .' Mr4. w..M.....% N-,rbd R.." _ — w is a 0IP 0 K wnn...e.wW.. Jll-..-17.. t e. a- tea.a D + n.... D. a.\..A..,...s .. o..... ,e.n.eD'... 1 —..........r r a snlw..rw,u tl.c wu.-r..a....,e. TRyF#' CgS 1.15Cz,,.,.n.....,....,M 4-,•••s,, ME TsAlr1G DEfNL'T r ,6_#C.UYIIIG DETAIL-NC II 1 Q .roe NI,......u....w......u.<....o .0,C....0 3 a•pr..a e... x WI=1 I SA-094-81 L 2 V-014-82 3 oa r ry. OM uefw ann Or ns 7.:O wMx AVnmIsiw.n...r y . ss xr.r es, hY i•-"" wr•set i iWUM rYy w w/a 1 eaglwxuYl I/lgIkf A'*MA_uWfX JN NY j 11I w4urnstow.4 won. w 7 1,OKJ,$TuVIIJAL ,0-110 f fRAU6VERhE hf(.T1O11 s A iI I 1 i II Ill O a m zr a a1m i $ t 3 I 1 SA-094-81 1014-82 8 A 4 CIRCULATED: June 30, 198 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : La LIrI E APPROVED J APPROVED -WITH CONDITIONS Ei NOT APPROVED SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZEDDATE ;7/Z/Z REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 3/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED EI APPROVED .WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED jI DATE : 7(2-/c- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 I 2 t34ir NENORANDUN OF CONCURRENCE APPLICATION NO(s) : SA-094-81 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct four (4) one-story concrete tilt-up buildings (12 to 15) to be used as a business park or for light warehousing. PROPONENT: Koering, Holvick de Regt (Washington Technical Center) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street and Powell Avenue S.W. LEAD AGENCY: Building and Zoning Department DATE OF ERC REVIEW: Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under PP-056-80, R-057-80 on February 1980 are within the scope of that original proposal and the environmental determination of non-significance is still valid. This decision was reached following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, David Clemens, Roger Blaylock, Steve Munson, Gary Norris and James Matthew. Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of 16 the ERC on application SA-094-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Impact Statement: Earlington Park Dated: February 1981 it 2) Application (s) : PP-056-80, R-057-80, FP-096-81 . This memorandum of concurrence is issued subject to the following conditions : 1 ) Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way will be unsafe until the intersection is signalized. Therefore, Powell Avenue cannot be opened to Grady Way until the signalization is completed to City standards. 2) The Final Plat for Washington Technical Center must be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. SIGNATURES: 4/-e-i'CY Ronald G. Nelson avid . Clemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director 1-14—Alf°- R ' hard C. Hou hton Public Works Direct Date circulaL.,d : Comments due : ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 101_ 81 APPLICATION No(s) , SA-094-81 PROPONENT : Koering, Holvick de Regt PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center Proposal to construct four (4 ) one-storyBriefDescriptionofProject : concrete tilt-up buildings ( 12215) to be used as a uslness parorfarlightwarehousing. LOCATION: Southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street and Powell Avenue S.W. SITE AREA: 146 , 330 sq ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) — 46 , 404 sq. ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : 31 . 7% . IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :X 3) Water & water courses : X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life : X 6) Noise : X 7) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : undeveloped east : industrial south : undeveloped west : undeveloped Lend use conflicts : minimal View obstruction : further evaluation with individual buildings 9) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : Not applicable 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : (From EIS) Assuming 50% office & 50% light indust: traffic impact649 trips Major 14 ) Public services : X 15 ) Energy : X 16) Utilities: X 17) Human health: X 18) Aesthetics: X 19) Recreation: X 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS: EIS previously prepared. Supplemental traffic data provided.1 . Project generally conforms to EIS 2. Traffic impacts remain crucial although somewhat reduced.Signatures: 3. Flood hazard remains unreso d. 7 Ronald G. Nelson 16aVid R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director R ' hard C.- Ho ghton, ublic Works Direct r REN V BUILDING & ZONING DEP TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 - 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT : Holvick, deRe&t E. Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking_ and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at piDperty lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : X ENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION D5FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OGTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1/ice 137PPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Renton fire Dept. 11DFirePreventionBureau JUL, 1 1982 I i./1:////''' i fi 7\S7L/J DATE : 7 /ke SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMEk , , DIVISION : /3C- /716 OAPPROVED • APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED I ix: t/Z77 ceL- G f 4 chi/ v-z, cfri' 20(,49c'tese-- DATE: e) —72— SIGNATURE IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1 l APPROVED EI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Uv 4/ di/iv/fp e6 .2 -e(71 14,/f/e-/-‘,. DATE: 0 /(6 -7- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : fI APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE: 17- /-2_ P1 A TI Inr nr rr nrn-rnn nn wi ITIInn r-rrn nrnnrnrwr-w-r t..r IIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIO 4411.1111110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARINGEXAMINERATHISREGULARMEETINGINTHECOUNCILCHAMBERS,CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JULY 13, 1982, AT 9 : 00A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: ALTERRA CORPORATION (BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK)Appeal by Alterra Corporation, File AAD-052-82, of adecisionbytheEnvironmentalReviewCommitteeregardingimpositionofcertainmitigatingmeasuresuponarezonerequest, File R-129-80, for a 71 . 16 acre parcel fromG-1 , General Zone, to M-P, Manufacturing Park; locatednorthofS.W. 7th Street, east of the proposed P-1 Channel,south of the old Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul RailroadRight-of-way, and west of the extension of Thomas Avenue S. HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING Application for site approval to locate four (4) one-storybuilding (12-15) on the subject site to be used as abusinessparkorforlightwarehousing, File SA-094-81 ;property located at the southwest corner of S.W. 7thStreet & Powell Avenue S.W. HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING Application for site approval to locate five (5) one-storybuildings (1 -5) on the subject site to be used as abusinessparkorforlightwarehousing, File SA-095-81 ;property located at the northwest corner of Powell AvenueS.W. and S.W. 7th Street. HOLVICK deREGT & KOERING Application tor a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (A) ( 1 )of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the locationofdrivewaysatpropertylines, File V-014-82, to beasociatedwithWashingtonTechnicalCenter, Final Plat,File FP-096-81 . Specifically related to site plan reviewsSA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and SA-101-81 for Holvick, deRegtKoering. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file intheRentonBuildingandZoningDepartment. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BEPRESENTATTHEPUBLICHEARINGONJULY13, 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M.TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: July 2 , 1982 RONALD G. NELSON BUILDING AND ZONING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION i, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THEABOVEDOCUMENTSWEREPOSTEDBYMEINTHREECONSPICUOUSPLACESONTHEPROPERTYDESCRIBEDABOVEASPRESCRIBEDBYLAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 30th day of June, 1982. 5.29.14-7("44-1 2-720- 4J SIGNED: REN'. .,.V BUILDING & ZONING DEP TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT : Holvick, deRegt 6 Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of Cie Parking and Loading_ Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at piJperty lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S .W. S S.W. 7th Street. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : K ENGINEERING DIVISION l 1 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION MFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU l 1PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT l ] BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EIPOLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l ! CTHLRS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD EE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1/X t RAPPROVED 1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED D Renton Fire Dept. iFirePreventionBureau JUL, 1 1982 I- ) i.„.. 7 ____J DATE : 7 ` ` /ke SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN' _ N BUILDING & ZONING DEFhdTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT : Holvick, deRegt e Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at pi3perty lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. b S.W. 7th Street. TO : pi WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : X I ] ENGINEERING DIVISION l ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 l ] UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT l ] POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ?/-D6 l ! APPROVED A APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED I i--/sue --ae' ce iizei 1 ,;ciii,e_e_ /2„ 6i_.7- / 4<< ,f cr-z___ e , wI.- /2-40,e, i Z ,f/51--\----DATE : fl/ r 3 J Y7 1 SIGNATURE IREOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN _ N BUILDING & ZONING DEF ITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) 4 PROPONENT : Holvick, deRegt S Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at prJperty lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S .W. b S.W. 7th Street. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : K 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 Ei UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ell PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 74- b(a G,(77t Oil APPROVED r-] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED V6/a."2( V% 4/ /6( gV di/ e?4t 7 5756ef DATE : ://OrSIGNATUREOFDIRECTORORAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN _ N BUILDING & ZONING DEF ..tTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT : Holvick, deRegt 6 Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at priperty lines . LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. 10 : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : X 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 ri ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ell PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT lEIPOLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PC /i E:;' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS i l NOT APPROVED DATE : 17-- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN vN BUILDING & ZONING DEI-,..1TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT : Holvick, deRegt 6 Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at priperty lines . LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. b S .W. 7th Street. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : x 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU l IPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON A.s.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : U<<LiTy n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I INOT APPROVED DATE :7 f2/"- SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN_ _ N BUILDING & ZONING DEF ___JTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT : Holvick, deRegt b Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at piJperty lines . LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S .W. & S.W. 7th Street. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : x ENGINEERING DIVISION l ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 DUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU F-1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 11BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT l ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1-1 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : MAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1] NOT APPROVED DATE : 7//Z7F SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JULY 13, 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : ALTERRA CORPORATION (BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK) Appeal by Alterra Corporation, File AAD-052-82, of a decision by the Environmental Review Committee regarding imposition of certain mitigating measures upon a rezone request, File R-129-80, for a 71 . 16 acre parcel from G-1 , General Zone, to M-P, Manufacturing Park; located north of S.W. 7th Street, east of the proposed P-1 Channel, • south of the old Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul Railroad Right-of-way, and west of the extension of Thomas Avenue S. HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING Application for site approval to locate four (4) one-story building (12-15) on the subject site to be used as a business park or for light warehousing, File SA-094-81 ; property located at the southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street & Powell Avenue S.W. HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING Application for site approval to locate five ( 5) one-story buildings ( 1-5) on the subject site to be used as a business park or for light warehousing, File SA-095-81 ; property located at the northwest corner of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street. HOLVICK deREGT & KOERING Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 ( 2) (A) ( 1 ) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines, File V-014-82, to be asociated with Washington Technical Center, Final Plat, File FP-096-81 . Specifically related to site plan reviews SA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and SA-101-81 for Holvick, deRegt Koering. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 13, 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: July 2 , 1982 RONALD G. NELSON BUILDING AND ZONING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 30th day of June, 1982. ysL vrcG/ 2 2 SIGNED: 4,1!a,;,.4arlgfike,igiern CITY OF RENT( T No 21796 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3 - I RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 b2 Z9 V RECEIVED OF 1 UQ- 4-5-R2\-6,(3 ilevu, co TOTAL c_50,00 GWEN E. MARSHALL, IN CE DIRECTOR BY (2 t Receipt # CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME DATE PROJECT 6 LOCATION 4. • .. ,: Toy: ./,j,, 'a:. ( ;,,• Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank vou. HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Date January 18, 1982 To : CITY OF RENTON Planning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 Attn . : Mr. Roger Blaylock RE: Variance Application We are transmitting herewith : Two copies of the application with the filing fee of 50. 00 . If maps are needed, please contact Bob Roed of Bush, Roed, & Hitchings. (206) 323-4144/ Remarks : Very truly yours , HOLVICK deREGT & KOERING By Mike Selman For your approval : X For your records :FtENTON BUILDING DEPARTMENT As per your request: MUNICIPAL BUILDINGAVENUE Approved as noted:2RDENTION, WASH• 930, As per instructions :JAN 21 REC'D ONE OAKMEAD TERRACE•1230 OAKMEAD PARKWAY,SUITE 210•SUNNYVALE,CALIFORNIA 94086•(408)736-8533 r .. OF R4,iv VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF RENTON 090 P PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9 TF0 SEP . O T 206) 235-2550 r 1 + NOTE: TO APPLICANT: Please OFFICE USE ONLY read instructions on back of this form Application No. :V-°/1/- 51 J' carefully before Associated File(s) : 6/9 -091'-P/; preparing your appli- 5-6'i SA -/ /- '/ cation for VARIANCE. Date Received: Date Accepted: Approved: 0 Denied: DATE: Publication Date: Affidavit: Comprehensive Plan Zoning: In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The Planning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application (note Variance Application Procedure on the last page) . 1. Name of Applicant: Hnlvirk deRegt Knering 2. Mailing Addreess: 1 Oakmead Terrace, 1230 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 210 Sunnyvale, CA. 94086 Telephone No. : (408) 773-01 1 3. APPLICANT IS: R Owner Lessee Contract Purchaser C] Other (Specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: N /A Telephone No. : 5. General location of proposed project (give street adriress if any or nearest street and intersection) : Powell Ave SW & SW 7th St. 6. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : See legal description on property map. 7. State EXACT VARIANCE REQUEST/SPECIFY CODE SECTION: Code Section - Chapter 22 Parking and Loading (4-2204) Part 2.A. 1 . Variance for location of driveway at property lines. MILL SOUTH RENTON BUILuirvu DEPARTii.CNT MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 RENTON,wHSr1E 980 1-izji 21 RECD III 8. Why can't the property ix.. _Jveloped within the requiremen )f the ordinance? Our desire is to construct a business park with free flow of traffic from one lot to another within the plat. A common driveway with half the driveway on each lot better serves-the common access space between buildings as generally done in business park developments. AFFIDAVIT John S. deRegt President of Holvick deRegt & Koering, the) being duly sworn, declare that I am the/owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Si t e o Owner 1230 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 210 Address Sunnyvale, Ca. 94086 City, State, and Zip Code Number) Telephone No. (408) 773-0111 Subscribed and sworn before me this 15th day of January , 19 82, Notary Public in and for the State of C1a fo nia p foil residing at Sunnyvale irtn x xxxxuxxxuuuuuxuxmxxux iu MARY JO ALDERSON 401 NO ARY PUBLIC-CALIRNIA PRINCIPAL( FICE INFO Name o NFlt SANTA CLARA COUNTYaryPublic My Commission Expires July 25,1983xmxxxxxxxxxxxhxmxxxxxmmxasanD 1230 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 210 Address Sunnyvale, Ca. 94086 2- Justification for Driveway Variance Variance for the driveway locations is necessary to better serve the goal of this development in providing an overall business park environment for the entire plat of the Washington Technical Center. Other business park developments utilize the concept of one common driveway used by adjoining lot owners. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare and will enhance the property improvements within the vicinity and zone surrounding the Washington Technical Center. The approval of the driveway variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege since the City of Renton has granted similar variances for other business parks. Common driveways represents good layout design and use of expensive property. it 4-2204 4-2204 1)provided for single family dwellings and duplexes. Alleys shall not be used for off-street parking and loading purposes. (Ord. 2787, 7-2-73) 2 Ingress-Egress A. Driveway Location 1) Industrial, Warehouse and Shopping Center Uses. The location 4-- of ingress and egress driveways shall be subject to approval of the Public Works Department under curb cut permit procedures. Driveways sr:all not exceed forty percent (40%) of the street frontage that the property fronts on. There shall be a minimum of forty feet (40') between driveway curb returns where there is more than one driveway on property under unified ownership or control and used as one premise. Driveways shall not be closer than five feet 5') to any property line exclusive of the property line the curb cut is parallel to. 2) All Other Uses. The location of ingress and egress driveways shall be subject to approval of the Public Works Department under curb cut permit procedures. Driveways shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the street frontage that the property fronts on. There shall be a minimum of eighteen feet (18') between driveway curb returns where there is more than one drive- way on property under single ownership or control and used as one premise. Driveways shall not be closer than five feet (5') to any property line exclusive of the property line the curb cut is parallel to. B. Driveway Width 1) Industrial, Warehouse and Shopping Center Uses. The width of any driveway shall not exceed forty feet (40') exclusive of the radii of the returns or taper section, the measurement being made parallel to the center line of the street roadway. The Board of Public Works may grant an exception upon proper application in writing and for good cause shown, which shall include, but not be limited to the absence of any reasonable alternative. 2) All Other Uses. The width of any driveway shall not exceed thirty feet (30') exclusive of the radii of the returns or the taper section, the measurement being made parallel to the centerline of the street roadway. C. Number of Driveways 1) Industrial, Warehouse and Shopping Center Uses. There shall not be more than tv.o (2) driveways for each three hundred thirty feet (330') of street frontage on property under unified ownership or control. i 370;873;181 11. 11. 11. 1. 11111/ 111111. 1 1, 1• 11. 11111111. 111111111. 101110 SM." MOW' OH NONA TOOL too. a 177, vow 4 LOWY moo or tows, ow%- 1 I . 4 15. ra.,. ''. • ••• A' Oo,• 1. 1_ a f i 1 1,- ,,________„;„____________ ,___, - --_=__•, , _,,,_____- t I. T.a I ,-, •.• II 1 1 I1, 0,#, ,, • ISUlotte r t 4 1 . 4. I I4t1i tOe• le, am), KO ma Niko 1 r -'•-• ....., ' r j 11 1 ROO Peonill nuo, r, • ile to... MI61/ • 6 1 rP-....• L• 111/ 61.. IONSCONIPTION i 1. ' I ,`, -.. ril• 11 kl, N... 111M''-. 4 Wt. ft.. fl'''' Wii. 141::;:• 7•. 7°`'"`'''''''''''''''' 4. a! ti) 1 " Ljit- 1: 11k) t) \ 1-• 4 k,,,,,,, n• AT PORTON Of Tot Saurian, LARTO Or I I CE 1 1# i . 1Fl Nall ArONE; r0" FTIDI: C= 7S7Arg i,L_% 1 ___'''' - 1,'. 22___' _-, 11/'..,•:: 21,..": 4___ 4__ 472 -___-.±.. I',-'..; w-- i.,.... 6E144 A POIO1 OP Ott LIM L oot OF EAAL! ACTON f e 4.•! i.». ' s Z i 1 iMpoSTA i AL PAPF L., AS; WOOLED IA Eau.. OS 1 • ^ r 1 1,•:.: 4• 71: aO: O gror: srA:! rgrai. f. . r. 1 -- I 11- . I: icei I loi 4er.. 17g XI: 7. M°.:::::".",•'!,:;• eg' i 1: li i 1 rAllillift i 1. 111Wil Mink k..? 1,,, 1 _________ 3 ........., - EAST S. W. O• FtET SO TM NORTH l ion OF not SEWN ,,---- , . 41 1 orsoroo• ____.: ,..... oe TO Troot EAST I. PK or IWO EMIL ISE IWO. L. t. 1 T• Olotlo PEST PALA SAM EAST LI. 1, IP. OS FEET TO not PO., Of LSOLIFW. 1. t T • T- T-- s.e.• i f I a. ..• i ,,," - i-,, t --- --'; i I 1 Pill ,--- 1 lt• , .' - 1 0 z II * # i 44....GU,1 ••• ...,..!.-.- 1•:'..,'.. ,.:..,.':.;'"-"""'.' 1 f'... f. Z. r.), 1 . ,..: 1F- t 1', 1'.!'. a, t1rWar', 6• Xt oa o••••., I . I••• 1..‘ i' al, 1- 1 1 , ' t 1 r - 1 A. . 2.--- I,--...-...„_---,,,,_. 4. ,_,/,;:_ sre" s., , .... 7.: 2 . ...: __-, t mktlo to, 4 , , ','•,-•, 1 4- t I AWN co, t 0.. i, , V' r- C• I rev. . 1.. 1) W., ;,.•., 1'I,,- 1; M41111., 1a,0•', 44 l iIa, 4114. V.( 1. 11 t) r. 7- 71--, lPtb. 4-• I.".. -,'_-',.,._,•,....•,,... 11.. 4.., s - I -- 1/. . . . 7 1 A bfi. s/ NoH yo. o. - 4 I I 1... 00 10 II 1 z• t• t mr• rlic.•• 151 * s_ 1 •' _ 4, L -, I, i. i• ___. 1 .#. r111, 1' 14. 4104 I IV. ' 1.. 1 • W 11...• OP 0 r 7;.!,,,..:•:.:‘.... 7::.' r.,....- raCi: 4 C.. . . 4 4 ... -- ,.... 1 ' 1_ 6. s. L z I r---, .! I it raII 1 IJ •••• I CC 1 1 Lei.• mei. i, 1 $..*: 0 , 1 r ..... 71. • ,- ' 1, ib J, (... r) / I a.U) a. Ivry/ won-- 5r, p41, 15• F. 4. 4. 0 ow .'• / cio.. TOly 11, 11011C koio 17, 1.... r. Of 1-, ... , 01, Er. i - S ... I •••• -_ , 00/ / 1. VW., W ion cort•,% Malt 4 LA= lir 11411 , wn, o,. 3 ... mu, V * , t.t. i . • g • ...\.'"••••‘.- t 1 awl% Ikotootaln WA 14, 041. 1 a. r. r- i at: 44.. 00m AKA 8, eao re i i 4,......., . .., / • / k 1 ' .. r„ 1.--. i n : I' i., TOT n kkewooto. mow., Wiser I.< NUM OJ ji...- 4- A , is- Se.-- Ida-...--- •••.... n. l - iii- . .. --. 0• L-- W.-••••., - 1. 7 ti ao. itI: loSol V 7 s. 7:-/- SI 04=-•••• ea` w t...\ 1: '... 1r._. /..., r- ii-- -' 1 moo. a.. i, ...... 40.=•..,) ad* oz.... a... 0. 4.••••• ti: Ztro:• 2/. 14` 41. 1i I intAvi' M.,. ELMO orTIO left won woo marital. ON lorotaim I PAntl W4. 1 w. 4e v e NT 1. 4 fr* Ve ZitMet. rk.. gZrar" te, V."... i.' 4 L 1.••••••••c. ._ __ 1 7 Fi0: 741, ii. 1 „----- 1 tar,....,....: J 6 A ft T e L:' 4 G 0 I I-'''' i ! II ! '''' 1 F. e. Retfraeof, it vg. NITURe RENTALS ac. own.... romps % Or., at( who. it) 7' II !_ .- 1 : / LOT 4 woo..% 41. LP MOW AO. 11. 4 It I NH Et. L. Plitt POTION sywrem* otw wa• 7.. 4 0 1::= Z" ititUr•.• 1 - 1-- t toiren• wo•• WI cow.: 10.. 1% lo::::= 5..', 41, 5:. •,,,, -,,... I. ... AO 1 ol 4. 1 Tt• I' L. AN - t5Lce. 4, • 1- I 1: 7 i- 112 r. rtvzr" i.,... ter'' 4,...•• 1: 1% t' llP4 t.. 4. w.. V v Tu. LLW. ASIOC MAIM 4. 1, 11117 41,( Mae SI if. o6t41" dVrect' 17. 4. V...... 4' 0 cA4g. t. gt- rAlt- 2 WraiNIIIMONEM linlr.ali WM, V 4 GI.Zi. 512Clicl ' Weld Q_LIS 11:)-i 1 II 1 414 4 .444,r, ss, I i ii 410 ,-`, 4,1.44 l',,,, 1 1.•/.,.. ..,1 140.. I' 1k,1 1 1 LT1itt °-11 WI.,•••••X . 2, . 1— ' 2' i' ..-- 1.1 7/ 1&TY:P. 7''..,V 4 4 I IL l 1:1 i1 CO L 1 it .... ,. A. •,- ..... I . : 41, II li2I. f 4iArl -:I•i 1......•`..L1 L AI."Nkr 1ling Oi i i o 11 ill -,, , 1,11,ififte./. 4 fri„444aboa i 'i-I 1 i •4- 0 N rir CP r V.gi .1 r.• , / l__. VW.VI 21:2). 1.... i. 4.— 0 j i! 0 :• I. ,i. f".i,, ,,4.p. '..\‘.-•••.,..12 1.1.11....... 14,..Z.' L'' 111.0.sta Ow AN*.ima 10.••••) A 1 ......_.. _i'M,a. vapana••••:ION-, 1 o... I••• li 141 11::1•Y 4114t•;42.ilra,TZ0Z212r. i q nli CI 0 I 1.2.!. illy.•,...2.”.2 I.* . ,, I trona .ntriC) mien,•,1 ..I 01.112.SINIS WI.. 4" 11>%"...1:71**".1;;.%'77.':,':::::'.40:1:11,1:"1,1' 2••ram.2211 2 13;7; rj.=5 19I I.,. .... i,.UM 112 1022,12 211122.161 .. rce. . I_ Fa.1 21111.11/22.10I 1111-/V--WOE 1 Zi.*141Crlioll - lik:___ 10,1•11.181.2 de.11124armiaouetI.•40.112 A P.M NOV I•2 24. 21.1.20,2 2•1160.1 4112 A.11211.11 1.2•12 um.*C" [ I 4 =ci d ,_al 121..MS.IS.Witt•IS 2111../00 ir he ou0....Oa LIU••••222 1.2•611•21.2.1IIak,....11.12.21.WO.i•••......1 aarat ataa. —_, 1 _I",r••••' Si stAst• `7.--' 74trAg IP 11', 1 I 1.•t.O.1•14.21 AO.1 1.1.MINIM v _ 7,.....4.,1:-....---„r,..,•:-.::::-_,..............-.7.,.....-..:::,,..--_,,,:.: 11.-...... trox owl Aaw.a. 7.3..„--- it. —. .. I .....''''."--- MiLn:r.olls=arg r.....?;:i r.tx,r,trzrx,r4.:Lx.r.: t ._ 1.: t 7.. Ti RielaaanelONSO TWIPIV1 likle.•4.0.1•12 4. 4' • a AY 4411-42A24 'M"4, II.,••••••••/11.... 2.1•1•2••"1 7-//--. 1....) Ii:_. \ Lie •• . S. =._._____,....\ T F F1: mom 1 111._. i 1... ....1 ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE Site,Jt 1 1, u 1