No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA83-013 (2)BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TI,lE Tg-KOtt3 1C ED 4n a 010412.1 e MIAs, Applicant DELBERT B. ANDERSON/IIARY A. MINIETTA File No. R-013-33 Project Name Property Location 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. HEARING EXAMINER: Date April 12 , 1983 Recommendation Approval w/ conditions - 4/25/03 rei tiVE ()nogitANz ccoep1cc, )3n . `g-' 06&COSs() Req./Rec. Date Received5/4/83 Date Response 5/6/83 Appeal - Date Received Council Approval - Date Ordinance/Resolution # 7;5 , Date 61/4c/h Mylar to County for Recording l Mylar Recording # Remarks: UA.vru II II iI Is Il 1...,n I I% / / Rt.•l1!• ti7 .! N.• N•••"S 1/ All-beir ,b•1 I'•f Sr so Jr,oa as fa ci"s v xia7,.vc PAf o ,Icc6 V I ! / : i:y.,1 1 A/77•!D•'e0 6 /If 09 -- .crr.l L+,.-L.•v. '-.I .I.- 1I o--0-- ,• -_.2- +...smw:.7 1._..r.E., rn.Z...."-• ; - .•. . s a•(./ s1 t 1 CO,s L . A` 1 C. f 1 16/ 1 i i .— 7 , . l'fro ar.e.r..42.24,..) i 1 i / • .." / a I C4GL', /• '0 l o I I t o J 1 J71 i. k.,I It)i 5„..............,,, 04t• ......•",... :••••... . , ..... i: • • " •. • •.••-,....71,r-,!4• : : .• •, ,••. . , . . -. . . : •. ,,,,..„,. •• ,4 ' irrs• Srlio ra ice . , 1 Li/I/ lA7t •V/AIPAAJ 0 N 77'00 GO CITY.Ar TON C/N/TY /41A/' sc4,,, 2"'• #AI/111.I. i a: 6 povil D LAI•vw OA/wN MA •r • 041/11Ce MARY M//t//ETTA mu--MAR 41983 JOHN REWIND AND ASSOCIATES t,t E QEL ANLERSO,t/ CMS-vro•+cuwo-t+.No SURVEYORS • 617 '-. 1c IER s ss.aj G L-M,4.P BU/LD/46 ar—p( iRE K[NT w/]NIN•TO• a.1/7}-]J7] 2 t B UILDINGr a„.:'.i V t l p•Iq— OC31a•CD/Y Slaws n CHICK'S", Vain corm 59303 QF/4 v 5/7 FZAN e AS-BU/LTEnHaSaCK•Itla• Y loll lxtn( o.n t Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Cindy. atr U.PP being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that..She.is the ....chic.f....c.l e>;'i.S of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Washington.That the annexedisa Ordinance #3732 Di Public Notice Public ' 'ntadWHEREASaproperpeti- Building&Zo9 for change of zone hereby authcid uccessfu/ as it was published in regular issues(and classification of said proper- rected to chi der as he a $2 not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period ty has been filed with the of the zonin a row in the high( Building & Zoning Depart- amended, tr rse Thurs- to da ment on or about March 4, rezoning,tc Robe1 of O .c consecutive issues,commencing on the 1e duly , which petition referred to the Hearing Blockas s 27,le an from Pearl i Examiner study andorpublic shearing, of he City !I t do f ran and B; 2.4.thlay of June 19..8 3 and ending the and a public hearing having No. 1, at v, ought twit eCITYOFRENTON, been held thereon on or recorded ii two WASHINGTON about April 12, 1983 and Plats, page 74eretc_ Cltnt, t day of 19. ORDINANCE NO.3732 said matter having been duly King County,Washington. I -, inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distri AN ORDINANCE OF considered by the Hearing Said property being lo-scribers during all of said period. That the full amo THE CITY OF RENTON, Examiner and said zoning sated at 1123 MaplevenueWASHINGT0NrequestbeinginconformityS.W., Renton,Wa)CHANGING THE ZON- with the City's Comprehen AND SUBJECT FURTHERchargedfortheforegoingpublicationisthesumof $. I NG CLASSIFICATION sive Plan,as amended,and to that certain Declaration ofhasbeenpaidinfullattherateofperfolioofonehundrOFCERTAINPROPER- the City Council having duly Restrictive CovenantsfirstinsertionandperfolioofonehundredwordsforaTIESWITHINTHECITYconsideredallmattersrelev- byPetitioner-owners ex- insertion. OF RENTON FROM RE- ant thereto, and all parties ecuted o aboutonsCSIDENCEDISTRICT(R- having been heard appear- and recorded in the office of1) TO BUSINESS DIS- ing in support thereof or in the Director of Records andTRICT (B-1) (R-013-83 opposition thereto, NOW Elections, Receiving No.Anderson&Minietta) THEREFORE WHEREAS under Chap- THE CITY COUNCIL OF 8306200550 and which saidChief3 "'Oter 7, Title IV, (BuildingRe- Covenants are hereby incor-THE CITY OF RENTON, porated and made a partgulations)of Ordinance No. WASHINGTON, DO OR- hereof as if fully set forth.Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 4th 1628 known as the"Code of DAIN AS FOLLOWS: General Ordinances of the SECTION I:The following SECTION II: This Ordi- June 8 3 City of Renton" as amend- described property in the Hance shall be effective up-19 ed, and the maps and re- City of Renton is hereby on its passage,approval and orts adopted;n conjunction rezoned to Business District five days after its publica- tion.Q j! r herewith, the property lion.P P y (B-1) as hereinbelow hereinbelow described has specified;subject to the find Notary Publ' and for the State heretofore been zoned as ings, conclusions and deci- PASSED BY THE CITY residing at WaResidence District (R-1); sion of the Hearing Examin- COUNCIL this 20th i4ay of Feder and er dated April 25, 1983;the June, 1983. Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. VN#87 Revised 5/82 Renton City Council June 20, 1983 Page Two PUBLIC HEARING Discussion was held regarding revision to Lind Avenue S.W. required Six-Year to accommodate state highway project for installation of High Transportation Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane and correction of safety problem Improvement caused by cross-weaving of vehicles exiting and entering 1-405. Program 1984- Funding for the proposal , which proposes four lanes with sidewalks 1989 (colt. ) on both sides, is currently being sought through EDA fund applications, and it appears the project ranks high in priority. Councilman Stredicke indicated his opinion that due to timing of state project , priority item 25, Sunset Boulevard NE, 1-405 to NE Park Drive, will be one of the first to be accomplished. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AS AMENDED AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RESOLUTION. Councilman Reed asked if improvements required by priority 5 would be funded by property owners who have signed restrictive covenants agreeing to participate in an LID (SW Grady Way, Lind Ave. SW to Longacres Dr. ) . Mr. Houghton indicated formation of an LID in the near future with application for UAB funds also planned for the project. MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT 'AGENDA The following items are adopted by cne motion which follows the listing: Planning Executive Department appointed Ms. Kathleen B. Crow, 408 Chelan Commission Avenue SE, Renton, to the Planning Commission for three-year Appointmi.!nt term effective to June 30, 1986. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for Resolution. Fund Transfer Finance Department requested resolution to transfer monies from for Police Contingency Fund to Police Department budget to provide for Arbitration adjustments necessary as result of Police arbitration award. (See later action. ) Refer to Ways and Means Committee. 1983 Population City Clerk provided 1983 population estimate from Washington Estimate State Office of Financial Management for cities , towns and counties in Washington; Renton - 32,700 (formerly 33, 100) . Info. Springbrook/ Policy Development Department proposed Springbrook/Alberthal Albertha Annexation for 2. 7 acre site located along the east side of Annexation Talbot Road South adjacent to Springbrook Watershed to ensure protection of city water supply and key transmission main. Set public hearing for July 11 , 1983. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Paul A. Friedrich, Assistant Administrator of Valley General Long Ran,le Hospital , provided the hospital ' s updated progress report on Planning its long range planning process. Numerous meetings with various Process Update - hospital representatives, elected officials and consumers were Valley General held from March through June, this year, and a 60 member Consumer Hospital Advisory Council formed. The following alternatives for hospital service to the community are currently being reviewed: 1 ) traditional hospital ; 2) community medical center; 3) regional referral hospital such as Harborview; or' 4) combination of alternatives. First draft of the committee' s recommendation will be publicly reviewed on July 7, 1983. Councilman Rockhill requested fiscal responsibility by hospital administrators in view of escalating medical costs and suggested referral to other facilities within limited distance for certain services. Councilman Hughes concurred, noting concern with charges being imposed following treatment and limited coverage to Medicare patients. ORDINANCIS AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committe( recommending the following ordinance for second and final readings: Ordinance #3732 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the yp,j, ezon Anderson-Minietta property, located at 1123 Maple Avenue SW, from Residence District (R-1 ) to Business District (B-1 ) , File No. Renton City Council June 20, 1983 Page Three ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS continued Minietta Rezone R-013-83. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT continued THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. Councilman Stredicke objected to rezone to B-1 category due to inconsistency with other zoning classifications in the general vicinity and in view of imposition of restrictive covenants prohibiting commercial development. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Fire LanE An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 4-2204 of Revision Title IV (Building Regulations) relating to fire lanes. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Bennett-P'ulti- An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Vest Rezone property located on the north side of N. E. 4th Street R-024-83 approximately 950 feet east of Union Avenue N. E. from General Classification District (G- 1 ) and Residence District (R-3) to Business District (B- l ) for Bennett-Multivest , et al . , File No. R-024-83) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK TO ALLOW REVIEW OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT REZONE SITE. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolutic:n #2515 A resolution was read authorizing fund transfer from Contingency Fund Trarsfer Fund to the Current Fund/Police Department budgets to provide for Police for certain pay adjustments and benefit increases received from Arbitration Police arbitration award ($171 ,965.00) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED Award BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSIP,ESS Council President Trimm announced an Executive Session regarding Executive Session labor negotiations as last item on the agenda. Park and Ride Councilman Stredicke advised the State Department of Transportation Lot - Hic_ hlands is no longer pursuing plans to locate a Park and Ride lot at the Highlands Community Church site; but will report back to Council following review of other alternative locations in the Highlands. Open Space Citing recent newspaper article regarding reclassification by King Classification County Assessor Harley Hoppe of Longacres Race Track to open space Longacres Race category, Councilman Stredicke requested investigation of the Track matter. Mayor Shinpoch agreed to research whether or not the designation has been changed, and, if so, whether or not the King County Assessor has authority for approval of the revision. ADM!NISTNATIVE Mayor Shinpoch announced annual challenge from the Senior Citizen REPORT Sluggers to Mayor, City Council , and Administrative staff at Softball Game 4th of July softball game and celebration at Liberty Park. Executive Session MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. CARRIED. Time: 9: 10 p.m. ADJOURNMINT Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all Time: 10: 05 p.m. Council members present. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1984 - 1989 AS AMENDED AT PUBLIC HEARING 6/20/83 ITY PRI RITY # ANNUAL ELEMENT PROJECTS 1 Grady Way Bridge Replacement 2 Renton Area Transportation Study 3 Wells Avenue Bridge Replacement 4 Garden Ave. N, N 4th St. to N 8th St. 5 SW Grady Way, Lind Ave. SW to Longacres Dr. 6 NE 3rd St./NE 4th St. , Sunset Blvd. N to Union Ave. NE 7 Talbot Road S, S 16th St. to S 41st St. 8 N 1st St. , Park Ave. N to $urnett Ave. N 9 S 2nd St. & Burnett Ave. S Intersection yell!Rainier Ave. S, S Grady Way to Airport Way X IZ SW Sunset Blvd. , Rainier Ave. S to Stevens Ave. SW lz/3 Miscellaneous Street Improvements 14 Lind Ave. SW, SW 16th St. to SW Grady Way SECOND YEAR PROJECTS Y4 15 Rainier Ave. S & S Grady Way Intersection R • Monroe Ave. NE NE 6th St. to NE 12th St. 16 SW 16th St., Lind Ave. SW to Monster Road SW THIRD YEAR PROJECTS 17 S 7th St. , Rainier Ave. S to Smithers Ave. S 18 Oaksdale Ave. SW, SW Grady Way to I-405 19 Oaksdale Ave. SW, SW 16th St. to SW 34th St. FOURTH - SIXTH YEAR PROJECTS 20 Oaksdale Ave. SW, SW 16th St. to SW Grady Way 21 Lake Washington Blvd. N, N Park Dr. to City Limits 22 SW 27th St., Oaksdale Ave. SW to West Valley Road 23 SE Puget Dr. , Jones P1. SE to Edmonds Ave. SE 24 Monster Road SW - Alternate Access 25 Sunset Blvd. NE, I-405 to NE Park Dr. 26 Taylor Ave. NW, Renton Ave. Ext. to Stevens Ave. NW 27 NE 12th St. , Lynnwood Ave. NE to Union Ave. NE 28 Union Ave. NE, NE Sunset Blvd. to NE 24th St. 29 Edmonds Ave. Extension 30 N/NE 3rd St. - I-405 Undercrossing 31 Union Ave. SE, NE 4th St. to SE 4th St. 32 Miscellaneous Railroad Xing Improvement Rev. 6/16/83 4 r WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE 20, 1983 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Minietta Rezone (R-013-83) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Amending Portion of Section 4-2204 Relating to Fire Lanes Bennett Multivest Rezone (R-024-83) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adoption : Fund Transfer for Police Arbitration Award C Ear Clymer, Chairman f,lIVCf'CCn tGfdk! R9.J'fard Stredicke Rob( Hug es OF R4,, A. 4• ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 017- SEPZ0,0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR June 17, 1983 The Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Members of Renton City Council Municipal Building Renton, WA 98056 RE: Zoning Information Request (B-1, L-1 and MP Zones) Dear Mayor and Council Members: In response to the City Council's request of June 13, 1983, to distinguish the difference between the B- 1 (Business Use); L-•1 (Light Industrial); and MP (Manufacturing Park) Zones, the following is offered by the staff: B-1: The B-1, Business Use Zone, generally allows retail sales and services, entertainment, and multiple family residential uses. Offices have been considered retail services. L-1: The L-1, Light Industry Zone, allows all uses in the B-1, Business Use Zone, plus certain industrial uses which are considered "light" in character such as (1) auto body repair shops, 2) clothing manufacturing, (3) commercial bakeries, and (4) warehousing. MP: The MP, Manufacturing Park Zone, allows all uses permitted in the L-1, Light Industry Zone. However, it differs by imposing greater setback requirements (60 feet compared to zero), and performance standards for (1) noise, (2) smoke, (3) dust, (4) odors, (5) toxic gasses, (6) vibrations, and (7) glare and heat. Site plan review is required. Very truly yours, C o 4" JLSISQ Roger f. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:se CITY CLERK f 01 R THE CITY OF RENTON pH MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR. AO P• CITY CLERK 0 (206) 235-2500 94TFD SEPTc_t0 June 22, 1983 Mr. Delbert B. Anderson, Partner Anderson & Associates Insurance 15 S. Grady Way, Suite 117 Renton, WA 98055 Subject: City of Renton - Ordinance No. 3732 Anderson & Minietta Rezone 013-83 Dear Mr. Anderson: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of June 20, 1983 has adopted Ordinance No. 3732 , as above-referenced, rezoning your property from Residence District (R-1) to Business District (B-1) . A copy of the ordinance is enclosed. As a condition of the rezone Restrictive Covenants were filed with King Co. Records & Elections, receiving recording number: 8306200550 . If you have any questions, please call this office. Very truly yours, CITY OF RENTON 47', .,oee..:AL.,:17d)" Maxine E. Motor City Clerk MEM:db Enclosure cc: Hearing Examiner I CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO . 3732 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-1) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT B-1) (R-013-83 Anderson & Minietta) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV, (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" as amended , and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District (R-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building & Zoning Department on or about March 4, 1983 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation , study and public hearing , and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about April 12 , 1983 and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Ccmprehensive Plan , as amended, and the City Council having duly ccnsidered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been hEard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : 1- SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as herein- below specified; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated April 25 , 1983 ; the Building & Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinances , as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein . Said property being located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. , Renton, Wa) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-owners on or about June 3 , 1983 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections , Receiving No . 8306200550 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 20th day of June , 1983 . mot, f -'- Maxine E . Motor , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 20th day of June , 1983 . T C cvtcv Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Wa en , City Attorney Da:e of Publication : June 24 , 1983 Ordinance No. 3732 EXHIBIT "A" Rezone R-013-83- Anderson & Minietta Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62, Block 27, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, records of King County, Washington. ii ;r 7 . CIiiiI IC.••• 611 4Ir. I".Zoos a— I w rtlt 7 4 TJf OCrr...rrr en 4 44 7IlO--" 01 N r/ t• O 22 or /•I r:;1. s r ;} 71 fir• Z I --+ - I. o II . i _ . .:._ . FHE Er1 r I. 5 so fy' u rI• a. "' 4 3 t ;It' I to • 77 II r r• • • P M ••• o " 1.i l Sac• FF y y;,.%•""'' y a TO. Nil 1 J a C•`r- ' iii i... ,.....5i„,,,,i.. . ,,..v..',--;': ,,,,,. ----..44„ .. , • ..:....... i. ,. . s. .16 11411 i..: ', i iliii?icy Cf - sT Q 3 a Aaid. ;• JA0444..rAlliP:10, Nisei . eila ,..t._,; II. I 4 L. w 0 y r 10121111111 fi es 9101 . • s6:7 ' I 0c:t eV INIPwSk- 11,il '-i 1,,,,5. ,s WI S• Vf w t as. r• 4' " y• 114915A.,, Ilia aina.."IWO Et 12 711 s'777 1 1107*1"l• 11 r ..._______________ Z.g 4 2 . r---0 5;-ii•;1. 7 '' 110111111111 l i lommoest ,Aii-, _ .. ,log r 1+ • . i .W- • p{ ARY WO 1 .it JLT•/s•A•S ~ ..---- 0.' "e7 AsC1 . K j 17:-..1&"' .4' A rs ase/ 'AT' r CITY OF RENTON so„r I Et Nr. _+ ,tDEPARTMENTOFPUBLICWORKStt ••' E ZIREZONER- 'I3-83 t, ANrERSoN 4 MINIEI A IL. i 1.. r,_ lb , I D[t10Nt0 FILE NO DATE 6-83 r y I DRAWN__F 4NECKEDSCALEI••= 200• nS••oo• n rf4 Er P. 11P ROV[0_ OF_CI•IC 1••0••uwc NTEROFF I CE M _ AO TO: Maxine E. Motor - City Clerk DATE: 6-20-83 FROM: Abdoul Gafour - Engineering Dept . SUBJECT: Rezone R-013-83 Anderson 8 Minietta Per your request attached please find the legal description presented under Exhibit "A" for the ordinance of the subject rezone . A vicinity map is also attached for your usage . Mn[ Very truly yours , 2C CITY CLERK EXHIBIT "A" Rezone R-013-83- Anderson & Minietta Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62, Block 27, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, records of King County, Washington. r il if :i , 7.- .1.• : gio A oS A lJ ) 1 40 F. 0. 1Gt 0 71t ill do 1I":200 j 1 N•/ 0", ; 2 i`iiii1.11 aft, • err n I O p rl J I r M Ft rt Q 11ts i y w. ;, 0•"" S t® O 1 . s YiT °1j;Ill r I • THE PpW E w EsM 15. y , it 1?%t! l, %*) 1117 - 1111.111111"...'.111 o'"_,_ r"ti: t 1 I tJ'YS tA.I j1O r 4 : ' 1 n 3 r I1:7• .i%a °.---r- 1/, 0*V9 81 • li IL-° i too ,....„_ , ,log! ,,,....1.1‘.__ _: .. cp,f, ,,, . T 14 4 * / 1."'gil 10 iv/4.r,,.•!/ : i. ; 510 1 fopp. sr of1001101 , i oil 00 I s 01 a/ Il a r• • •1 .• r 34_ ii,101:1 J. A.V.,;• id. . pMg 4 ,i. i .4,i!' 41_, _•:", , Sli 15 114• r/ !INNO 1. 4 , i g! ...,,/,; 596 It 1 NI . 1 P`' -I,, lir 54 6i 54 14°9011*le W. 41i I ST .. 60 ,., t Og° 41;• Q.1011101ir # Jr- 0 gOggi 4 40 4 .Fr" 4._;t . t IN1 Er111111g1s.....444 ,,,,,,drilIllIllIllMBillI3j a L - •' j pq A FY I 110111 do 4-4 I lam/`il - 11r 1 N I 2 ,..161/ r n 4N 1 1. 4[ 7 • we I f- --C----' c A >ti /..a• a O 1 I CITY OF RENTON s +.; '-.• SOl.r„ 41 S t ~ 1 N r. _, *DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IK a•„.• 'w C A pp1 u ,.',r,• 41-.ye. •• Ea G E Z 1REZONER-r I3-83 M CO ANnER , N 4 MINIE11A f ,..6 w; lit44 p tDESIGNEDDATE6-83 FILE NO. 1 ti DRAWN I a• s• 1 7• CAI C I % 20o' f•,. J,s.+J - h, CHECKED FIELD ADO. ••ate_ i APPROVED SHEET OF__au.CSa•41•Yaut WOW Renton City Council June 13, 1983 Page Six OLD BUSINESS continued Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill advised the Development committee has referred proposed B-1 Zone code revisions provided Committee by Policy Development Director David Clemens to the City Attorney B-1 Zone for approval of form and to the Hearing Examiner for technical , not policy, review. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second & final readings : Ordinance #3730 An ordinance was read annexing Jackson property, located at S .E. Jackson 167th Street, south of Parkwood Subdivision , east of Nelson Middle Annexation School . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3731 An ordinance was read fixing the interest rate on special assess- LID 322 ment installments to be paid on LID 322; fixing the amount , form, Puget Drive date, interest rate, maturity and denominations of LID 322 bonds; and BenEon Road) and directing the issuance and ratifying and confirming sale thereof to Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation of Seattle. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. Councilman Stredicke questioned impact from the Thiel lawsuit, and it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, AMEND THE MOTION TO INSTRUCT CITY CLERK TO DELAY PUBLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE UNTIL APPROVED BY CITY ATTORNEY FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT OF LAWSUIT. City Attorney Warren felt the lawsuit would not have an appreciable effect on the LID assessment. MOTION FAILED. ROLL CALL ON ORIGINAL MOTION: 6 AYES: TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinance for first reading: Minietta Rezone An ordinance wa§ read changing the zoning classification of the R-013-S3 Anderson-Minietta property, located at 1123 Maple Avenue SW, from Residence District (R-1 ) to Business District (B-1 ) , File No. R-013-83 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. Speaking in opposition to the motion because of the zoning classification recommended, Councilman Stredicke requested staff to report back next week regarding the purpose of the B-1 zone, and differences between L-1 , M-P and the recommended B-1 zone. MOTION CARRIED. Chairman Clymer expressed concern that the matter not be delayed further. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Resolut on #2513 A resolution was read endorsing the 1982 King County Comprehensive Solid Woste Solid Waste Management Plan. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, Management COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. Responding to Councilman Plan Reed' s inquiry regarding the city' s partipation, Councilman Mathews stated $2,396 is the maximum amount to be paid from Current Fund Garbage Account. CARRIED. Resolut on #2514 A resolution was read authorizing interim financing for LID 325 LID 325 Interim by borrowing approximately $35,000 from the Street Forward Thrust Financiig Fund 301 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE One Valley RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested Place) his "no" vote be recorded. Municipal Arts Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Commission recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Ms. Lois Appointment Hoffman to the Municipal Arts Commission to complete a vacant three-year term effective to December 31 , 1983. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Civil Service Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Commission recommending concurrence in the Mayor 's appointment of Ms. Margaret Appointment Proctor to the Civil Service Commission to complete the term of, B. J. Richardson, effective to 12/31/84. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. P WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE 13, 1983 APPO I IN TMENTS The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Ms. Lois Hoffman to the Municipal Arts Commission to complete a vacant three- year term effective to December 31 , 1984. The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Ms. Margaret Proctor to the Civil Service Commission to complete the term of B. J. Richardson , effective to 12/31/84. j GENER{1 OBLIGATION BOND REFUNDING The Ways and Means Committee recommends acceptance of the proposal to purchase the following bonds by Seattle Northwest Securities Corporation : 1) S2,655,000 Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds 2) S7,140,000 Unlimited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds The combination of these two refinancings will save the City of Renton approximately 560,G00. APPRO'!AL OF VOUCHERS The W3ys and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 51292 through No. 5 602 in the amount of $1 , 170,828.59. E r-- 1.77/1 ORDIN.WCES FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING c-) , c « c_ej Jackson Annexation f 7 v LID #322 Bonds ORDINANCES FOR FIRST READING Minietta Rezone R-013-83 2,655,000 Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds 6, 140,000 Unlimited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds RESOLJTIONS King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan Interim Financing of $35 ,000 for LID #325 5-71/1 Ear ?1ymer, Chai& an Richard Stredicke Rob t Hughes RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 6, 1983 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALI. OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED, COUNCIL MEMBERS RICHARD M. STREDICKE, RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT J. HUGHES, EARL CLYMER. CITY STAFF IN BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J . WARREN, City Attorney; ATTENDANCE MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; RICHARD C. HOUGHTON, Public Works Director, CAPTAIN DON PERSSON, Police Department. PRESS Jan Hinman, Renton Record-Chronicle. MINUTE A'PROVAL MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MAY 23 , 1983 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mayor Shinpoch introduced Council Secretary Billie Dunphy 's daughter , Introduc' ions Lisa Thomas, who will be attending Girls State at Central Washington University in Ellensburg next week. Also introduced was Deputy Clerk Marilyn Petersen 's mother, Lucille Newton , visiting from Salt Lake City . CONSENT ,AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Civil Se-vice Mayor Shinpoch appointed Ms . Margaret Proctor, 4124 NE 10th Place, Commission to the Civil Service Commission to complete the term of B. J . Appointment Richardson, who has resigned . This appointment will be effective to 12/31/84. Ms. Proctor, former City Council member, has served on the Citizens Advisory Committee for HUD grants and on two assessment center exercises for the Civil Service Commission. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Municipal Arts Mayor Shinpoch appointed Ms . Lois Hoffman , 7633 South Mission Commission Drive, Seattle, to the Municipal Arts Commission to complete a Appointment vacant three-year term, effective to 12/31/84. Ms. Hoffman is a musician and teacher from the Lakeridge area and is a long-time supporter of cultural events in the Renton area . Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Skyway Sewer Public Works Department requested review of King County proposal District for turnover of Skyway Sewer District to Renton or other agency. Refer to Utilities Committee. Coulon Beach Parks Department requested acceptance of contract completion , Park Contract authorization for final payment ($126,664) and release of retained CAG 025-81 amount upon receipt of required clearances for Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, Contract #2 (CAG 025-81 ) ; Frank Coluccio Construction Co. Council concur. LID 325 Interim Finance Department requested resolution to provide interim Financing financing for LID 325 (street improvements for One Valley Place One Valley Place) project) from Street Forward Thrust Fund pending reimbursements . Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Six-Year Street Public Works/Traffic Engineering Departments requested update for Improvement Six-Year Street Improvement Program 1984-1989. Set public hearing Program 84-89 for 6/20/83. Refer to Transportation Committee for review 6/14/83 . Birke Claim for Claim for Damages filed by Lawrence E. Birke in undetermined amount Damages for damage to "E" Street Apartments, 955 Edmonds NE on 5/27/83, CL-18-83 alleging sewer damage. Refer to City Attorney & Insurance Carrier. Minietta Rezone earing, Examiner ecommends approval subject to conditions of R-013-83 Rezone No. R-013-83 from R-1 to B-1 for property located at 1123 Maple Avenue SW, Mary A. Minietta and Delbert B. Anderson, applicants . Refer to Ways and (leans Committee. 4 • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Charles Minietta and Mary A. Minietta, husband and wife, and Delbert B. Anderson and Nancy L. Anderson, husband and wife, are the owners of the following described real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington: Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62, Block 27, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, according to the plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, records of King County, Washington. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property", desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners and purchasers hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: SETBACKS A.A twenty (20) foot setback shall be required along all adjacent streets in which no structures may be built. B. A six (6) foot setback shall be required from dissimilarly developed zoning districts which must be fenced by view obscuring means and landscaped as approved by the City. USE A. No retail use shall be developed on the property. SITE PLAN APPROVAL A.Site plan approval is required of any development of the site. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. Scs. Charles Minietta Delbert B. Anderson 7"11 .a )27- ary AMnietta Nancy L. derson STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. County of KING On thij day of y , 1983, before me personally appeared Charles Minietta and Mary A. Minietta, husband and wife, and Delbert B. Anderson and Nancy L. Anderson, husband and wife, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. kA\N\t` di \\\6:1'C)\ Notary Public in and fdi' the State o W shin ton, residing in 4 For Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # J . !w. AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING a rasa as=====c SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of June 6, 198 Meeting Date Staff Contact Fred J. Kaufman Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT:File No. R-013-83 Consent X Minietta/Anderson Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A.Examiner's Decision 4/25/83 Other B. Requests for Reconsideration 5/4/83 & 5/12/83 Approval : C. Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Council concur; Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A X Referral to Ways and Means Committee Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Expenditure Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary.) The appeal period for the attached Examiner's Report and Recommendation and Requests for Reconsideration expired on May 20, 1983, and the matter is hereby forwarded to the City Council for review and referral to the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of an ordinance. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See Examiner's Report, page 6 SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO:Files DATE : 6/3/83 FROM: Maxine SUBJECT : R 013-83 Anderson & Minietta R-1 to B-1 Mary Minietta called (228-4064 Anderson & Assoc. ) re Recommendation condition No. 2 Site Plan to be approved for development. She worried about time and did not want to loose 6 weeks;I Talked with Fred. Advised Mary M. that only Hearing Examiner119uuld review and did not need to go before the Council. Fred said all thea e w en Grady,Way and 16th SW; Benson Rd. and W. Valley Rd. was being classified with same requirement of site plan approval rcquirccnt as part of Green River Valley Comp. Plan. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King SUE ELLISTON being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 25th day of April 19 83 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. 9%4141—, Subscribed and sworn this 1st day of June 19 83, i4441- 1r)C-, Not Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: MINIETTA/ANDERSON - File No. R-013-83 The minutes contain a List o 6 the pa iez (16 necond. ) O1r R ? A. 11, THE CITY OF RENTON0z INN MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co- FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 94T co#EO SEPT June 2, 1983 Mr. Delbert B. Anderson Mrs. Mary A. Minietta Anderson & Associates Insurance 15 S. Grady Way, Suite 117 Evergre en Building Renton, WA 98055 RE: It-013-83, City Council Action Dear M Anderson and Mrs. Minietta: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review. You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council. If further assistance or information is desired, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincere:yy, Fred J. Kauf-ran Hearing Examiner CC: City Clerk Building and Zoning Department ti OF' SW I t$ ©THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 n rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYC;2 • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 094TED SEP1Eo0 P May 18, 1983 Mr. Delbert B. Anderson, Partner Anderson & Associates Insurance 15 S. Grady Way, Suite 117 Evergreen Building Renton, WA 98055 RE: R-013-83, Clarification of Reconsideration Dear Mr. Anderson: I understand that you have some concern regarding the nature of the landscaping necessary to protect the westerly property. The landscaping can consist of vegetation, fencing and sidewalks and other similar features as long as there is no building or parking permitted in what is intended to be the buffer between the existing single family home and the subject site. If this office can be of further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, iat C°34-w Fred J. K ufman Land Use Hearing Examiner FJK:se 0114E cc: Parties of Record ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I T INSURANCE professional protection is our policy! May 12 , 1983 City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner Fred J. Kaufman Re : Applicant - Mary A. Minietta and Delbert B. Anderson File Number - R-013-83 Petition for Reconsideration Sir: Re would like this letter to constitute our Petition for Reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner ' s recommendations of April 25, 1983 , and his letter of May 6 , 1983. First, we would like a clarification of the Hearing Exam- iner ' s final paragraph in his letter of May 6 , 1983. Spec- ifically, what constitutes "appropriately fenced and land- scaped. . . " It was our understanding that because detailed site plans (dated April 29 , 1983) were submitted with our May 4, 1983 , Petition for Reconsideration, the landscaping and set backs as shown were acceptable. It now appears that there might be some confusion on that point. We intend to put up a wooden fence the length of the western property line. This would be between 48" and 72" high depending on the Hearing Examiner ' s requirement. Substan- tial landscaping would be used to buffer the actual building structure from the one family residence to the west. How- ever , it is our desire, as shown on the April 29th site plan, to have a sidewalk on the northwest corner of the property to service the alternate entrance and exit. We plan to have two feet of landscaping in this area which is north of the building structure. This area has only parking to the east and the fence would, by itself, block the view of the vehicles . 15 SO. GRADY WAY SUITE 117 EVERGREEN BLDG. RENTON, WA. o©cj F 22E3-4064 City of Renton May 12 , 1983 Land Use Hearing Examiner Page Two Second, we would like reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner 's recommendation (2) "Site plan approval of any development of the site . " It was our understanding the submitting of detailed site plans to the Planning Department and then to the Hearing Examiner, with our Petition for Reconsideration, would be sufficient. Those plans were drawn after consulting with the various interested departments of the City of Renton. Time is of the essence for both the building partnership and present property owners. The business owned by partners, Minietta and Anderson (Anderson & Associates , Inc. ) will be a major tenant in the proposed building. Anderson & Assoc- iates , Inc. , is presently leasing space in a local office building. This lease expires in September 1983 and it is important to have the proposed building completed by that date. The present property owners, Mr. and Mrs. George Little, need to purchase another homesite. They have found the home they wish to purchase but their decision is based on the rezone of this property. The building partnership has gone to considerable expense to have detailed plans drawn in advance of the approval of the rezoning because of the deadlines referred to above. Again , it was our understanding that, by submitting detailed plans with our May 4th Petition, it would not be necessary to have a further site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner. ANDERSON-MINIIETTA/ aid 4K‘44.Arx____,/ Delbert B. Anderson Partner DBA/jr OF RA,A 4ID © o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 P.BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 09A O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 4)) T O SEPTE. P May 6, 1983 Mr. Delbert B. Anderson, Partner Anderson & Associates Insurance 15 S. Grady Way, Suite 117 Evergreen Building Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for Reconsideration re: R-013-83 Dear Mr. Anderson: I have reviewed your request for reconsideration and find that the request is justified. The westerly abutting property, while one of the few remaining single family homes in this area, is nonetheless entitled to protection from more intense uses. Therefore, consideration of the policies enunciated by the Comprehensive Plan concerning incompatible uses requires buffering greater than that indicated in the zoning code. While the code may indicate a smaller buffer, that is only applicable to existing zones. Since your request is to reclassify the site, it is within the city's authority to condition the rezone as necessary to effectuate good land use planning. Therefore, the requirement for a larger buffer. This is especially so where, as in the instant case, your proposal does not meet the designation in the Comprehensive Plan. The six foot buffer you propose must be maintained the full length of the property line and again, it must be appropriately fenced and landscaped as approved by the city's landscape architect. Sincerely, Fred J. Kfman Land Use Hearing Examiner FJK:se 0093E cc: Parties of Record RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARtNG EXAMINER ANDERSON MAY 6 1983 PM ASSOCIATES kM 7 Ri9il01llil2a t2t:3.4F5,6 INSURANCE ORM professional protection is our policy! May 4, 1983 City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner Fred J. Kaufman Vie : Applicant - Mary A. Minietta and Delbert B. Anderson File Number - R-013-83 Petition for Reconsideraton Gentlemen: We would like this letter and the attached documents to constitute our Petition for Reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner' s recommendations of April 25, 1983. Prior to setting out what I feel to be the basis of our Reconsideration Request, I would like to point out the steps we have taken to get to this point. First, our contractor, Mr. Lloyd Small, brought a tentative site plan to City of Renton Building and Zoning Department for their review. This site plan , drawn by the engineering firm of John R. Ewing and Associates, was left with the Building/Zoning Department on March 4 , 1983. (This plan is part of the April 12 , 1983, Public Hearing file. ) The con- tractor was told a few days later the site plan appeared to be acceptable. Based on this , we hired Architect Rodney G. Parr & Associates to draw tentative plans . These plans were entered into the record at the April 12 , 1983 , hearing. It should be mentioned, that prior to drawing these plans , a representative of the architectural firm also called the City of Renton Building/Zoning Department and was told the tentative plan appeared acceptable. 15 SO. GRADY WAY SUITE 117 • EVERGREEN BLDG. • RENTON, WA. • 980 F3i 228-4064 Fred J. Kaufman May 4 , 1983 City of Renton Page Two After the April 12 , 1983 , hearing, it was obvious that if Departmental Recommendation lb. be accepted by the Hearing Examiner, we could not build the building where we desired, that is near the east side of the property. The recom- mended twenty foot set back from Maple Street would not allow sufficient space for parking on the west side of the property. Our representatives again went to the Building/Zoning Department to see if this tentative plan was acceptable and again, we were given tentative assurances that the final decision would not be more restrictive than the Departmental Recommendations. Based on this, we went back to the archi- tect and he drew the attached plan with the building on the west side of the property. Now, apparently "to protect the single family home to the west . . . " , the Hearing Examiner recommends a ten foot set back instead of a six foot set back on the west side. (See April 25, 1983 , report Conclusions 4. ) This would make the enclosed plan unaccept- able and make it virtually impossible for us to use this piece of property for our needs. It should also be pointed out that we went ahead with archi- tectural expense based on "tentative approval" as time is of the essence for both the building partnership and the present property owners, Mr. and Mrs. George Little. Specifically, we request reconsideration of Recommendation lb. and request that the set back from the west side of the property be set at six feet. The reasons are as follows: 1) The Hearing Examiner 's recommendation was based on his conclusion that a ten foot set back from the western boundary is necessary to protect the single family home to the west. This conclusion is incorrect. Attached is a note signed by the property owner to the west, Alice M. Ashley. She has no objection to the six foot set back. In fact, she has indi- cated she would like to see the building built on the west side of the property so the parking lot is not next to her property. Fred J. Kaufman May 4 , 1983 City of Renton Page Three We feel both the letter from Mrs . Ashley and the attached site plan constitute new evidence. First, the site plan had not been drawn at the time of the Public Hearing. Second, as the Department Recommendations called for a six foot set back, no reasonable person would have assumed that a letter from Mrs. Ashley indicating that the six foot set back was accept- able to her would be necessary. It should also be pointed out that there are no other residences left west of the property to protect. 2) The Code calls for a five foot set back from side yards and a ten foot set back from rear yards. This is clearly a side yard (the alley in the rear is on the north side of the property) so there is no basis in the Code to require ten feet. ANDDERSON-MINIETTA LeEY Delbert B. Anderson Partner DBA/j r 1:2 e7/i7 /7- ThAL61 . April 25, 1983 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: MARY A. MINIETTA and FILE NO. R-013-83 DELBERT B. ANDERSON LOCATION: 1123 Maple Avenue, S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from R-1 to B-1 to construct a 6,000 square foot office building. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval, subject to conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Recommend approval, subject to conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on April 5, 1983. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 12, 1983, at 9:45 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the Building and Zoning Department report. The following documents were entered into the record as follows: Exhibit #1: Application file containing the Building and Zoning Department report and other pertinent documents. Exhibit #2: Assessor's Map showing the subject site and its relationship to the vicinity. Exhibit #3: Site Plan Map for illustrative purposes, which is not binding upon the City nor the applicant at this time. Mr. Blaylock reported that the Environmental Review Committee has placed the following conditions upon the proposed rezone: 1. Positive outflow for storm drainage shall be provided; 2. Participation in street improvements on Grady Way between Maple Avenue S. W. and Rainier Avenue South for additional capacity is required. Based upon a fractional share of the acreage, the amount of charge for the subject property will be $6,493.50. Mr. Blaylock further indicated the ERC issued a Declaration of Non-Significance, the appeal period expiring on April 11, 1983 and that there have been no objections received to that declaration. The Examiner asked if parking along the alleyway would be maneuvering on the public right-of-way or would the maneuvering take place in the parking lot. Mr. Blaylock stated the maneuvering would take place in the alleyway; he does not believe there would be any restrictions to backing into an alleyway. Minietta/Anderson: R-013-83 April 25, 1983 Page 2 Mr. Blaylock reported that the Building and Zoning Department recommends approval of the rezone, subject to the following conditions: 1. Filing of restrictive covenants requiring: a. Site plan approval, including landscaping approval; b. Building setback requirements of twenty (20) feet from all public rights-of-way and six (6) feet from the western property line; c. Require construction off six (6) foot solid sight-obscuring fence prior to the occupancy of the structure. There should be provision to allow the elimination of the six (6) foot setback and the six (6) foot solid sight-obscuring fence if the property adjacent to the west is rezoned either B-1 or L-1. The Examiner called for testimony from the applicant. Testifying was: Jack Ewing 622 S. Central Kent, WA 98031 Mr. Ewing reported he is the Engineer for the proposal and asked that the architectural site plan be entered into the record. The Examiner entered the following into the record: Exhibit #4: Architectural site plan of elevations and landscaping for the proposed improvements to R-013-83. Mr. Ewing indicated with respect to improvements on Grady Way, the applicant has no problems in terms of the dollar amount; the problem is with the time schedule. He stated if no time frame is established for the street improvements to Grady Way, then it is not timely to provide the $6,493.50 at this time. In terms of the overall zoning, because of the size of the lot, the MP zone is inappropriate for that area. He feels the area should be looked at as an L-1 or B-1 zone as it is being treated now. In terms of the site-obscuring fence along the west property line, there is an existing 4-foot high fence along the northern 40 feet of that west property line. It is felt by the applicant that this fence (which encroaches slightly on the property and belongs to the neighboring property owner) is adequate; that it is not logical to construct a six-foot fence adjacent to the four-foot fence and in terms of the zoning code, there is provision for a 42-inch high site-obscuring fence in conjunction with landscaping. Mr. Ewing suggested a four-foot fence be used which would be consistent with the existing fence on the property. In regards to the sewer line extension and talking to Mr. Monaghan, it is their understanding that the sewer line is supposed to be on Maple Avenue, not along the west property line; they have no problems with this as long as there is a latecomer's agreement that is attached to the extension of that main line. Mr. Ewing asked for clarification in terms of the water main extension required. He stated there is an existing 12-inch main in Maple and an existing 6-inch main in 12th and he cannot see where there would be any water main extension required by the City. In terms of the curbing on the alleyway, he is still somewhat confused by the requirement. If it is consistent with what is shown on the site plan, there is no problem; if it is something else, he does not understand what the requirement is. Mr. Ewing stated that the site plan shows a two foot separation from the alley to the first parking stall; this is consistent with the parking that is on the north side of the alley for the two existing office buildings. In terms of the parking spaces where they will be backing out or maneuvering into the alley, they have provided the added depth (8 feet) so they have 24-inch turning line so that the stalls are 8' oversized. Mr. Ewing further stated that Maple Avenue, in terms of the overlay, would be a standard condition as long as it is only the west half of the street; if talking about overlaying the entire street, he feels the office building which is on the east side of Maple should also participate, the same as it relates to 12th Street. Again, they are talking about a half street improvement rather than the whole street. The storm drainage issue was one they will have to address, as well as Mr. Gray and the other property owners in the area, and they have no problem with that position. Minietta/Anderson: R-013-83 April 25, 1983 Page 3 In meeting with the City staff prior to the application and reviewing what has been proposed in the site plan, it has been proposed for a 20-foot setback along 12th Street, which is consistent with the existing residential uses in the area and also the other office building; however, with Maple Avenue not being a major street, nor ever intended to be anything other than a collector, the applicant is consistent with the B-1 zoning code in providing 5-foot setback from Maple, not 12 feet. There is a 7-foot strip from the back of the sidewalk to the property line that will also be landscaped, but that is part of the public right-of-way. There is also one other variation that was not mentioned, but is shown on the site plan and that is the two parking spaces that are at the southwesterly portion of the site are within five feet of the right-of-way so there would be a five foot landscaping strip on that area rather than the provision for ten feet. The site plan, as presented, is consistent with the B-1 zoning code. The Examiner stated he is concerned about zoning to B-1 rather than Manufacturing Park or Light Industrial and that the City, according to the Comprehensive Plan, is not trying to condone possible retail use of any of this property; they are trying to make sure it is used during the rush hours. Mr. Ewing stated either L-1 or B-1 is permitted use for this facility; it makes no difference. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. There was none offered. The Examiner then called for testimony in opposition to the application. None was offered. The Examiner called on Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer for the City, to explain the curb requirements referred to in Report 6-b. Mr. Norris reported that curb requirements at the alleyway were in relationship to the access of the alley on the northernmost part of the property. The City is trying to avoid having backing out of a stall and making 180 degree turns into the alley; they required curbing which is marked on the plans that were submitted for review, through that first stall to give a ten foot space and put the cars into a perpendicular entrance to the alley. He indicated the curb on the east side of the parking stall itself would direct the cars back at a 90-degree angle, rather than allowing use of the parking stall itself for maneuvering. Mr. Norris stated the intent regarding improvements at Grady Way and Maple was that they had many different proposals for development discussed for the property in this area and they have been major proposals and all lead to a major problem of access to that entire site either by Lind Avenue or by Grady Way and the City thought it pertinent if, at the beginning stages of development, to allow some kind of mechanism to provide accessability to the property and the manner proven most effective to date is to assess each of the individual properties on a fair share basis. In this case, it was the square footage of the land which resulted in the $6,493.50 figure. At this time, there is not a construction program on line for this; however, the City is constrained by State Law which only allows retention of a developer's money for five years; the money is held in escrow and the interest received goes directly to the developer, so the City is not necessarily getting the use of the money over the period of time it would be held. If the City does not, in that five-year period, develop a program to make those improvements, then the money reverts back to the developer. The Examiner stated that the condition was imposed by the ERC and it was not challenged at that time; the condition is not subject to the Examiner's review except if there was an appeal from that condition, and he has no jurisdiction over the setting of the fee or the timeliness question. The Examiner then called for further testimony. Testifying, after affirmation, was: Bob Bergstrom Engineering Supervisor City of Renton The Examiner asked Mr. Bergstrom what the Engineering Department means by a positive outflow storm drainage. Minietta/Anderson: R-013-83 April 25, 1983 Page 4 Mr. Bergstrom stated the proposed water main extension revolves around the existing 6-inch main at S. W. 12th Street; the Maple Avenue S. W. 12-inch water main was installed by the City in the mid 60's to serve water flows to the then developing area along Longacres in the Valley. The 6-inch water main on S. W. 12th Street may or may not be adequate and at this point, the City does not know that, but if it is proven by the Fire Marshal's Office that the system is at or near capacity, then the proper mechanism for upgrading that would be for the City to ask that the main be rebuilt in the future and the property owner would be asked to sign a temporary service agreement committing them to share costs equally with others in the Valley along S. W. 12th Street. At this point in time, it is uncertain if the existing 6-inch S. W. 12th Street main provides adequate flow to the area. Whether that condition will be imposed on the property owner is up to further design decisions that will be made. The Examiner then asked if there is a 12-inch main in Maple and whether that would provide sufficient flow. Mr. Bergstrom indicated the entire area was originally single family homes and a 6-inch main was built to accommodate the area; if the area is now changed to light industrial, a stronger grid water main system would have to be constructed in that area and it turns out that if the six-inch line does not provide that type of support, then it must be upgraded. However, it could possibly be done at a later date when there are more people to share that cost and the developer would not bear the full brunt of the costs. The Examiner asked what the meaning was of the term "positive outfall". Mr. Bergstrom responded by stating that a request was made by the Public Works Department to provide gravity storm sewer flow out of the entire area to some type of system that is operational. We now have two major drainage conduits to drain this neighborhood with an existing drainage system in Grady Way that was designed to drain the highway; there is also a second drainage system that the State Department of Transportation constructed when I-405 was built, and it is an open-ditch type system that runs along the south side of the 40-foot roadway at the Lind Avenue overcrossing bridge. The City is requesting the property owner provide drainage into that system; it is the only thing around which has enough capacity to handle major urban development in the proposed neighborhood. Mr. Bergstrom further indicated that the City is working with the Washington State Department of Transportation to increase the capacity in conjunction with the Department of Transportation's I-405/HOV lanes that are being rebuilt. The Examiner asked if the applicant needed special approval from the Department of Transportation or could they merely tie into the system. Mr. Bergstrom responded that a permit may be necessary if the applicant goes all the way to the freeway right-of-way. The Examiner called for further comments or testimony. Mr. Blaylock indicated that the City would take the position that the Examiner does have the right to consider a rezone to L-1 since there has been a public hearing discussing the merits of both the B-1 request and the L-1 alternative and would not require a new application to rezone to L-1. There being no further comments, the hearing was closed at 10:05 a.m. The Examiner asked for an additional week to consider this matter. There being no objections, he advised the report would be issued within 21 days. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicants, Mary A. Minietta and Delbert B. Anderson, filed a request for approval of a reclassification of property from R-1 (Single Family Residential; minimum lot size - 7,200 sq. ft.) to B-1 (Business/Commercial). 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents, was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC). Minietta/Anderson: R-013-83 April 25, 1983 Page 5 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City Departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject site is located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. The site is actually on the corner of Maple and S.W. 12th Street. 6. The site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1928 in December of 1961. New zoning designations changed the original General zoning of the site to its current R-1. 7. An existing vacant single family home is located on the subject site. The vegetation on the site consists of lawn grass and other ornamental scrubs. 8. The site is essentially level, but is located in an area of potential ponding. Positive storm water control measures are necessary in the area of the subject site and staff has recommended that plans and profiles for a storm drainage system be submitted for approval. 9. The applicants propose to develop a 6,000 sq. ft. warehouse on the approximately .34 acre site if the rezone is approved. 10. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of manufacturing park uses. Similar requests have been granted in the area. (See Gray Rezone, Ordinance 3270; Dalpay Rezone, Ordinance 3308; Lewis Rezone, Ordinance 3482.) Building setbacks and landscaping of these setbacks have been required in these rezones to comply with the Green River Valley policies for areas designated for manufacturing parks. 11. The area contains a wide variety of uses, including older single family dwellings, commercial uses, and light industrial and warehousing uses. A single family dwelling is located west of the site, while existing office buildings are located east of the site. 12. The site is part of a multi-block R-1 district. An L-1 (Light Industrial) Zone is located west of the site, straddling Lind Avenue S.W. Immediately north of the site is a B-1 Zone, the category requested for the subject site. 13. I-405 is located east of the site and Grady Way is located north of the site. 14. The area is in transition from older single family uses to light industrial and office uses. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. While the request is not entirely compatible with the Comprehensive Plan designation of manufacturing park for the area, the nature of the lot and surrounding development indicate that the request is justified. 2. The older single family homes in the area have begun to give way to industrial uses and office uses as the area begins its transition to more intensive uses as a result of the construction of I-405. The request would permit the applicants to reasonably redevelop the site with uses approximating those indicated in the Comprehensive Plan. Minietta/Anderson: R-013-83 April 25, 1983 Page 6 3. In order to provide some fidelity to the designation in the Comprehensive Plan, the applicants should provide setbacks from streets and adjoining development similar in nature, if not exactly in size, to that provided in manufacturing park zones. Therefore, the applicants should execute restrictive covenants providing for a 20 foot setback from any adjacent public right-of-way with appropriate landscape treatment, subject to approval of the City. This provision is intended to approximate the provisions of the Manufacturing Park. As such, the requirement is not dependent on the nature of an abutting street, but is intended to enhance the visual image of the City and its various districts as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. 4. To protect the single family home to the west, a 10 foot setback with fence and landscaping should be provided. While the area is in transition, the policies element of the Comprehensive Plan requires that dissimilar districts be protected from intrusive uses, and landscaping and fencing should be liberally utilized to serve this policy. 5. The rezone of the property will continue the transition to the south of the existing business zone. It will also be compatible with the L-1 zone now located to the west along Lind Avenue. 6. Because the Comprehensive Plan designated the site and area for manufacturing park uses, it would be inappropriate to develop retail uses on the subject site. Therefore, further restrictions should be placed upon the use of the property to limit the site to office use, rather than permit retail trade. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should reclassify the subject property from R-1 to B-1, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant execute restrictive covenants which specify that the site will provide: a. Twenty (20) foot setbacks along all adjacent streets. b. Ten (10) foot setbacks from dissimilarly developed zoning districts which must be fenced by view obscuring means and landscaped as approved by the City. c.No retail use shall be developed on the property. 2. Site plan approval of any development of the site. ORDERED THIS 25th day of April, 1983. Fred J. Kauf n Land Use Hea ing Examin r TRANSMITTED this 25th day of April, 1983 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Jack Ewing 622 S. Central Kent, WA 98031 Mary A. Minietta & Delbert B. Anderson, A Partnership 15 S. Grady Way #117 Renton, WA 98055 George Little 329 Renton S. Renton, WA 98055 Minietta/Anderson: R-013-83 April 25, 1983 Page 7 TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of April, 1983 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before May 9, 1983. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. c u I, J Isw.vrrt II II 1Ir ! N. • I/ 1 ii. 0 di a s s? 1J 1 i4,.7rivG P..L.1 0 .ILCEY 1 SD / :i i;•.f I ---1 v ff•IO'eel-a- /I/Of L. s-•'.....,,,,,,,,,,„,,L.,........, - 1141-- ie-• 0i'sro-- ' TL i«ii•wwll c>i--a I vei—v..iis1new.L I 7.L G C 1 t t.,c s , 00 s..r.. ANDERSON, DELBERT B. & , c cto / c MINIETTA, MARY A. rai~°'w; G I 3o A PARTNERSHIP) GI IN i 1 R-013-83 gt i is- --"- --.... ...."-- S..--4.e.C„-,-,-. 4 ( 4. 111IfwvOrevs I . J / I 7O a!LLNo LO) I I / Lo rri a PROvw1E0 I;/ /.1 r'c tom• /: ,o'X ofsicE o . GL//LO/./0 u 8 l1 J p • • `I Q\h / IV I • 1 / v V. ' N Y\A.eIA ear' ' i. f ; 10,,,, IIML.INO.lCA.rYw/O Z:`liter•. - •.n r':•"1.! 14I ' 1\ 1ITs- t' fmot •. w lQQ ast 7Z---'''- 1.7... :-- ,-.L'',1.71-4,---- ''' I t\ I i•4,r..;iLML .v"wawa 0 2 51,/ /2 r"ST m r N77•so OO t_ N. 1 N.I vrc/.v/ry M. P rr„ CIir U;• ;£dTCN liy Ovpuum•L..../6 ae w.a.I FxX /0 r .vi c,..c°iv •O . MA,Pf/ M/N/ETTAMAR41983JOHNR.EWING ANO ASSOCIATES N t' OEG AA/LERSO/t/Bin C'ivt.ENONCUwe-IJ.NO SURVEYORS c. .IC\ 2•s,ae LPL-/yqe BU,LD/NG a.et,t,ralNIMOtOM It°.1.lt-N)) •'\ t,llil(ii•.'..;,!'1;;, i3Cf'i• 2,303 103 0ttrort°IV NIa0M.t CNtCat0•t 4$.<d TCOtiRm c,,.,o DESCRIPTOR a Iwata an ' 4 S/rE iZAN c AS•BU/Lr BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING April 12, 1983 APPLICANT: Mary A. Minietta and Delbert B. Anderson FILE NUMBER: R-013-83 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from R-1 to B-i to construct a 6,000 square foot office building. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: George Little 2. Applicant: Mary A. Minietta & Delbert B. Anderson 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 34 acres 6. Access: S. W. 12th STreet and Maple Avenue S.W. 7. Existing Zoning: R-1, Residential, Single Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1, Residential, Single Family; B-1, Business Use; L-1, Light Industrial. 9.Comprehensive Land Use Plan:M-P, Manufacturing Park 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on April 1, 1983, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on April 1, 1983. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1928 of December 12, 1961, at which time it was zoned G-6000. This classification was changed to the R-1 designation with the adopting of the new zoning map by Ordinance #3634 of June 13, 1982. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The site is essentially level. 2. Soils: Urban Land (Ur) is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with the addition of fill up to several feet think to accommodate industry or housing. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ANDERSON, DELBERT B. & MINIETTA, MARY A.: R-013-83 APRIL 12, 1983 PAGE 2 3. Vegetation: The natural vegetation has been removed and replaced with urban vegetation consisting of lawn and ornamental plants. 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5.Water: No surface water was observed. 6. Land Use: The subject site is currently a vacant single family residential building. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The neighborhood is a mixture of residential and business uses interspersed with vacant lots. There is evidence of some transition of uses from residential uses to business uses with a concentration of non-residential uses primarily along S.W. Grady Way. To the east and north of the subject site are existing office buildings, while to the west is a single family residence. Across S.W. 12th Street to the south is vacant land. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1.Water and Sewer: A twelve-inch water line is adjacent to the property along Maple Avenue S.W. and a six-inch water line is adjacent to the property along S.W. 12th Street. An eight-inch sanitary sewer line is located along the alley adjacent to the north property line of the subject site. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: METRO Transit Route #145 operates on S.W. Grady Way and Route 150 operates on Rainier Avenue S. and SR-167. 4. Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1.Section 4-706, Residence - Single Family. 2. Section 4-711, Business Use. 3. Section 4-3014(C), Change of Zone Classification (Rezone). H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1.Policies Element, Comprehensive Plan: Section 5A - Commercial Areas Objective and Section 5B - Commercial Structure and Sites Objective. I.IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1.Natural Systems: Generally, development of the subject site will have a minor impact on the natural systems. However, development of the subject site will increase storm water runoff which can be mitigated through proper development controls and procedures. 2. Population/Employment: Minor. 3. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social: Minor. 5. Traffic: Minor. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ANDERSON, DELBERT B. & MINIETTA, MARY A.: R-013-83 APRIL 12, 1983 PAGE 3 J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee. The appeal period expires on April 11, 1983. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1.City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4.City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6. City of Renton Policy Development Department. 7. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS; 1. The applicant Delbert B. Anderson and Mary A. Minietta, are requesting a rezone of .34 acres located on the northwest corner of S.W. 12th Street and Maple Avenue S.W. from R-1 to B-1 to construct a 6,000 square foot office building. 2. The Environmental Review Committee determined that there were be no adverse impacts on the environment or adjacent properties and have imposed the following conditions on the proposed rezone: a. Positive outflow for storm drainage shall be provided. b. Participation of street improvements on Grady Way between Maple Avenue S.W. and Rainier Avenue South for additional capacity is required. Based upon a fractional share of the acreage, the amount of charge for the subject property will be $6,493.50. 3. The Land Use Hearing Examiner must review four specific criteria under Section 4-3014(C) to determine that the circumstances surrounding the rezone request are adequate to recommend approval of the reclassification. The following evidence clearly demonstrates the rezone request is appropriate. a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject site was annexed to the city in 1961. Both the city-wide comprehensive plan adopted in 1965 and the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1975, clearly show the area as designated for manufacturing park activities. The R-1 classification was applied in 1982, as a result of a major change in combining several single family residential zones to one classification. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policy set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and the conditions have been met that would indicate that the change is appropriate. The proposed rezone to B-1, Business Use, is not directly in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site. However, the city has approved a number of rezones in the general area to both B-1, Business Use and L-1, Light Industrial as a result of the strict application of setback requirements in the manufacturing zone which would preclude the function and development of these small lots and blocks. The result has been to impose restrictive covenants establishing minimum setbacks for buildings and specific landscaped areas. This policy has been utilized since the late 1960's with the most recent application in November, 1982, under Ordinance #3666. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ANDERSON, DELBERT B. & MINIETTA, MARY A.: R-013-83 APRIL 12, 1983 PAGE 4 c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area, zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvement, permitted private development, or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. Since 1975, the general area has undergone a substantial transition from the older single family residential development to commercial and industrial activities. Development of the property to the north, west and east to office uses suggest that the request is both appropriate and timely. d. Timeliness: The final test to determine whether a rezone request is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. The subject property is the next incremental parcel to be developed both from the north and from the east. The residence located immediately to the west of the subject site must be screened by the proposed development. Public utilities, including streets, sewer and water are available to the subject site. It does appear that storm drainage may be an issue which has to be resolved prior to the actual construction of a building on the site. Thus, it would appear timely to allow the rezoning of the subject site. 4. The Policy Development Department has raised the concern over appropriate buffering between the anticipated office parking lot and the single family residence. The proposed site plan shows a varying width of landscaping which does not in itself provide adequate screening and separation of the uses. Policy Development suggests that a six (6) foot high noise/visual screen consisting of fencing/berm/landscaping along the west property line should be installed as an interim land use buffer. Removal could be allowed if the property to the west is intergrated with this use. It would appear that this is a logical requirement to screen the existing single family residence from the intensity of the proposed office building and parking lot. However, because of the variable width of the landscaping proposed on the site plan, a six (6) foot fence should be constructed along the property line to protect the single family residence. 5. The Engineering Division advises that the following conditions will apply: a. Plan and profile of all off-site improvements. b. Plan of on-site storm drainage. c. Original mylars of a and b above. d. Detail solution to storm drainage problem (ERC condition for positive outflow). e. Extension of the sanitary sewer south across the property to the center of S.W. 12th Street. f. Overlay of Maple Avenue S.W. may be required. 6. The comments from the Traffic Engineering Division suggests that modification will have to occur to the parking lot which may in turn effect the structure: a. Provide conduit and junction boxes for future street lighting. b. Curb ten (10) feet of space at the entrance of alleyway. c. Northwest corner of property parking space to have five (5) foot clearance from property line. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ANDERSON, DELBERT B. & MINIETTA, MARY A.: R-013-83 APRIL 12, 1983 PAGE 5 7.Utility Engineering Division advises that (1) water main extension will have to be provided, (2) extension of sanitary sewer to south from alley to S.W. 12th Street along the west lot line of the property, (3) that a late comer's agreement for sewer in the amount of $2,177.77 is payable, and (4) that system development charges of $.04 per square foot of property is required for both water and sewer. 8. The site plan locates the building twenty (20) feet from the right-of-way for S.W. 12th Street and twelve (12) feet from the right-of-way for Maple Avenue S.W. The rezones that have been considered in the general area to allow zoning classifications less than the manufacturing park zone have required that restrictive covenants be imposed for both site plan approval and establishment of a minimum of twenty (20) foot setback from all public rights-of-way along with a ten (10) foot setback from adjacent property lines. The site plan, as presented, provides a fairly detailed presentation of the development of the site. It does lack completeness in relationship to the landscaping treatment surrounding the building which is considered a part of site plan review. The issue of building setback from Maple Avenue S.W. is critical in relationship to the other developments in the area. All other developments have been required to setback a minimum of twenty (20) feet as part of the restrictive covenants and there does not appear to be any logic for allowing the building to be setback only twelve (12) feet, except that Maple Avenue probably will not become a major street such as in the case of Lind Avenue or S.W. 16th where other requirements have been imposed. Compliance with this general requirement, if imposed, would reduce the square footage in the building and resolve some of the conflicts with parking spaces proposed along the northern property line. 9. Other department comments are attached for the Examiner's and public's review. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the rezone request, R-013-83, be recommended for approval to the City Council subject to the following conditions: 1.Filing of restrictive covenants requiring: a. Site plan approval including landscaping approval. b. Building setback requirements of twenty (20) feet from all public rights-of-way and six (6) feet from the western property line. c. Require construction of a six (6) foot solid sight-obscuring fence prior to the occupancy of the structure. There should be provision to allow the elimination of the six (6) foot setback and the six (6) foot solid sight-obscuring fence if the property adjacent to the west is rezoned either B-1 or L-1. i, --- --- -- — Q 7 01 i I 1 0 I , ve.';' Z B-11:4..) _ . „ .,/ i::-0.-....t ... -I bualEcX 7-- i v4A-4 01111 I N A 1111011111.111101 S,o. ' - '-'- . . • IIII 0i! 1'.1 I 6 B-1 I 10 40 II! Ill jid1 . , MOO '•ITygri:!!!! 1__ N iIllli ll . I!lfyl r r T. r I; tiQi fff , Hoa 04... Ir:C31 64%* I h. i Ar io t iL.---iiit. NMI Wig 1- Kill ME - 11, elf 9 7 a, t SS s J 2 ss so L-1 t• s ao s to Lf I .isIft st 2• u t+ S• 7d t• a0 9 H aa 1 Si MI SS ss R11a1 ANDERSON & MINIETTA R-013-83 1E i A & APPLICANT DELBERT B. ANDERSON TOTAL AREA * 0.34 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 12th STREET EXISTING ZONING R-1, RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE FAMILY EXISTING USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED USE GENERAL OFFICE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK COMMENTS IIrJ. 1111l.I CA arrt II l II I I II il /awl il w'..•/•le•J A u•w.f•J to JO i y fXiOsi.VO pAL O .IccEY l fir. f.. 10 r iy.r.r N. 1f 0I, w/77'l0 bo 6 l o/If e c P1isr s esK.,r•>• 1 r....,I.s A, 7. r ui:ur./7.r ANDERSON, DELBERT B. & 14,Arwc 1 c G 7 c ,, 1 MINIETTA, MARY A. 0 ` G C "'% I I 30 A PARTNERSHIP) c I l ` R-013-83 L i I ' / I liti I C ro ar lwoVlO) I / / i i f 40' rrn J. I PROPoJEO 1 l f ... ' . a -- Q liAr•20. ,l JP I l -r QVT` 4, r` c 1'w.t 0 II.. e.t....ose.4.0.44/a f 4.INOJCAR'NG 1 LJ wr, 1 iN 5 leMOP'l\ i,row- twg/e..Va r-6L N//AIOAa 7 0 o SW /2 '".57" rn in V 77'20 GO le 0 t//C/N/TY /tjAP CITYF !'b7Q d_ a N r) iii 14., I 11 my i• {El O L.. E,r.it.ae ll",ia• bet Wove .vr AI.i w[wAeD• 10NN R.EWINO AND ASSOCIATES OWNER NARY M///E7TA FiE`MAP 41983 ANG PSO/4/ o uvlL eNonC[N.a•LAND IU11V[rOlq 1.)0' DgDJERz•ss•de JRGLL-/`7i4.P BU/LD/N6 77f 1' • •- M[Ni,4SNINDiON IEoslesi-ss» BUILDINV;ZUIJIN'G DCP1. D[f10NED Dt DIUWN Dt CN[CN[D Ni SiE CDNT[NT 29303 I . 4 I S/TA• ,BAN 1 A5•BU/LT 17___—REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI N: P//:/ • l C(/ .!C t APPROVED APPROVED WITH ONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 0 r 4 4 f A /joio4, / 5&ee/' eotsisty ela ly74.4f/m/.1y/.,4i-4/a,4e.79/7 d ,erfr/4, 0/0"-kir id& es ag Ae%,/,./ (etifd ae aor?, 4ni/ d/diel.,0 t ‘fibfi/V W ,/efl /s i „ 4/ &/i 7<f Ge . ef iatitto-4 DATE:0-,SI TURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : q?e----Z)6; ID at EIAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED l CL DATE: , f3 SIGNATU E DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE jE ION 6/1902 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :71 JE APPROVED IAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0NOT APPROVED itez)., -, 7-ae,',&e,-6--/..c.c.a- ,4.0-1:0 -60, Cl c?G' O J,L 4 i - -Y/G'7c-7 1 -or ce , ( ! GC.GQ G Y l r DATE: 3 ` 7- Y3SIGNATUROF101-14CL CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REP ESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :1-, -) . -, ,/,, z .---t 0 APPROVED El ROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED i p, ,i C±.'1...„) e-t_ f"--)." i-- / e 1 • J c,;(...4.-- „..0.....4' I ).--,._ ,..A 'er f .• _ ,_ , t4.1,. j je cc/4 . ,„, T / 0/1,1-1,4 - 1.-•—..."-- -,.." y,, )...2. , ..,....e..-e,,..! ...,... 61_ 7 e V je .. <.<, 4 Crti .re f.,7"-•• I'ar PAi-ikut. af-ai,",-4-.,_ 4-0 T,-,e4mAty Cy scdik ,.. P4-1".1- (I dc , ,,...___ c \r,i `- `:... 0=• iel.re•-,e-74...:) L? (/) l5 4. d /-, l' (:le 1" r'e eta et ( i'l : ty Lc.. ":'c'67 e r-,t L e 2 ci•e- 1 1.-____ _,....1. 4,_ •,,„.. 1...„.... DATE: 3/7457'7 SIGNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE L-/flr-22 REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : a774/Ty et-Aitc-/AiE;E,e/A/S- El APPROVED VI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED I UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO 3/9le3 A) .i.,, 4t4.:. LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER NO L;M(e444‘,4" LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER yEs• slas60 $a, /77, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • WATER yss ce,.04ic.1 Fr F PPTY bp 5 -/4( SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER Es gza 04A-7,airr Or PPTy cv,etilit _It, .9..1 n..045,- SPECIAFASSESSMENI AREA CHARGE • WATER NO clot, (- -(Z4r/Z.4Art, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER A/0 APPRCflO WATER PLAN W5 IF FIB Avn4Artog AA& aetzuolev APPROVED WER PLAN NO APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS YesBYFIREDEPT. FIRE FLOW A NO SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE j/il jr3 REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7 r.9 021 ; e 1.c-',--4---1 ---) ri APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ' El NOT APPROVED i, /..... .e..4' : ', A 4/..i e.7 •:1' • I Q Jil l'l :i' . •' -., i ''''C).- 4---. 1 i . , ,„ f‘ Z I i I I 1 L....7( i 01 * -i' ie..„, --..x. ...... ,...,..._ „ 1/4„.....i l,„ , rf., i. 1c.11 ud-) :-, .) fica (1QIN- '-t c-r- 17 P'''‘'-e--1----' i .,- /T-• , -I c DATE: ST TMATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OPIEVIIILICIal 6/1082 rCVIC 11VU Utl'NK1MCNI/U1V151UIV ; APPROVED El ROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 1r10 2 IMPAC 1 c N PA-R. k' 1'6 1/4- t) ST.1---ry1 DATE: /Y71J 7% -SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT ORIZ REPRESENTATIVE REVIRION_11/1282 FINAL L.,L.CLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANL.E Applica:ion No(s): R-013-83 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-010-83 Descrip:ion of Proposal:Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed 6,000 square foot office building. Proponent: Anderson, Delbert B. and Minietta, Mary A. (A Partnership) Location of Proposal: Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. Lead Agency:City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 16, and 23, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gary Norris, Ronald Nelson, Jerry Lind, Richard Houghton and David Clemens;. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-010-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Delbert B. Anderson, DATED March 4, 1983. 2. P pplications: Rezone (R-013-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Policy Development Department, Building and Zoning Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division and Utility Engineering Division. Acting Is the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Vill not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and that the following requirements shall be complied with: 1. Fositive outflow for storm drainage shall be provided. 2. Farticipation in street improvements on Grady Way between Maple Avenue S.W. and Rainier Avenue S. for additional capacity is required. Based on a fractional share of acreage, the amount charged for the subject property will be $6,493.50. SIGNATURES: onald i34-,irit,_ i R. emens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director to...-(-- ( ,-(d_e__,,,,f4-:,.. Ric and C. Houghton Public V!orks Director PUBLIS:-IED: MARCH 28, 1983 APPEAL. DATE: APRIL 11, 1983 Date circulated : I FI 4, 1983 Commen' iue : MARCH 15, 1983 ERVIROXNFKIAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 010 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : DELBEw B. ANDERSON & MARY A. MINIMA (A PARTNERSHIP) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.34 ACRE OF PROPERTY FRaM R-1 TO B-1 FOR A PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING. LOCATION : LOCA.[ED AT 1123 MAPLE A DI S.W. SITE AREA : 0.34 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross) 6,000 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (a) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X 3 ) Water & water courses : X SiORM l ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life :X 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : OFFICE east : SINGLE FAMILY so u t h : SINGLE FAMILY west : SINGLE FAMILY l and use con f 1 i et : POSSIBT E WITH SINGLE FAMILY View obstruction : MINOR 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Nuri.ber of Dwellings :X 13 ) Trip ends ( I I L ) : 74 TRIP ENDS traffic impacts : MINOR 14 ) Public services : 1 X 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities :X 51ORM 17 ) Human health : X 18 ) Aesthetics : X 1 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : Signatures: rf , it7c t 64 Cl onald G. Nelson id R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director eifi Qc/171 . Richard C. Houghn, Public Works Director n REI IN BUILDING & ZONING DE ;TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B Anderson & Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. TO : EI PUBIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3-16-83 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE: PREVENTION BUREAU i ] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOL: CE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIE` G , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 F .M. ON TUESDAY. MARCH 15. 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :l{/1G, c DAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 7 )7/M4 il e.exps ill a#4 JY 00/*"S Q 0' 4nle/w/ d/a/41A ;‘,./byri 0 1 is id &// Ai ae LAti/J4ate.4_ DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REI IN BUILDING & ZONING DE ITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF 83 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B Anderson & Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. 0 : F-] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3-16-83 121 ENGINEERING DIVISION fl TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : uTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU l ( PARES & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT l 1POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIrG , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 F ,M, ON TUESDAY. MARCH 15 . 1983 REVIEWINC DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : r OAPPROVED MAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS JJ NOT APPROVED 7,, 7E:V-e y e-v, ,'I- - //,i-- o,V t.r c.,.._. t-e Get.-d( C- 6--e .0)( e •J / z °(s.4- t f DATE : .3/7/ ' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1°27 REI IN BUILDING & ZONING DE 1TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 2_1_ — 83 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B Anderson & Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. TO : PUB -IC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3-16-83 ENGINEERING DIVISION 1TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : E] UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION I l FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARES & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT E POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIr' G , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 F .M. ON TUESDAY. MARCH 15. 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ratfiL El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 1^o vi f LQ!7 V L1-G cf a r V /4417 e/ i %, / i J O C DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REI IN BUILDING & ZONING DE ;TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - _Q; . - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) ;REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT ; Delbert B Anderson & Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE ; DEL-MAR BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 tc B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. TO : IPUB _IC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3-16-83 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ; C UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION I ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ei PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ri POLICE DEPARTMENT Ei POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIrG , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 F ,M, ON TUESDAY. MARCH 15. 1983 REVIEWINC DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T/,L,TJ! NI1/6/n/, ,E,Q./M4- APPROVED M APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED UTILI1Y APPROVAL SUBJECT TO of / ' / "3 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT WATER A/Q C i c.A^ LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER es S aB(p l'a,; /7, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE WATER y. ,v .04/SQ FT OF 7:PT'y Sv SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER ES g1Q404/4•Ar OF P Ss"ECI1L ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE WATER AJ0 2 la4Arc. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER ,D APFi;[YLD *`ATER PLAN WC5 IF Fief 14Y04w.+ng A,A& QW APPROVED ';'_WER PLAN NO APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS yBYFIREDEPT. FIRE LOW ANA[Y31S NO DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REI IN BUILDING & ZONING DE ;TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — QQ — 83 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B Anderson & Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE ; DEL-MAR BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 tc B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION ; Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. TO : fl PUB,_IC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3-16-83 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : uTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRF PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARES & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5; 00 F ,M, ON TUESDAY. MARCH 15. 1983 REVIEWINC DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; EAPPFOVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED DATE : , SIGNATU' )aF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REI IN BUILDING & ZONING DE 3TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - QQ — 83 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B Anderson & Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 tc B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. TO : IPUB _IC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3-16-83 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 7 F I RI: PREVENTION BUREAU F-1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POL: CE DEPARTMENT 1POL: CY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHE:RS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON TUESDAY. MARCH 15. 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l/2e 0APPFOVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED ie Az),"(_j1 L,,c,d-t2J Ze Di 4 i;e e_ C . k > idY DATE : SIGNATURE OF DI ,() L/ 7E 'CTOR OR AUTHORIZED R FENTATIVE CV.Q.A. G /If0l REI IN BUILDING & ZONING DE.-mulTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - _Q,Q - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B Anderson & Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. TO : n PUB _IC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3-16-83 C] ENGINEERING DIVISION L TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : C1UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE: PREVENTION BUREAU jaPARES & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POL] CE DEPARTMENT POL] CY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRI1If\G , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 F .M. ON TUESDAY. MARCH 15. 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED M / Noft PA-RK nvT/ okU s %-t' s DATE; ILt P , f-e% SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT ORIZ REPRESENTATIVE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON APRIL 12, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: J. CLIFFORD GRAY Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a 4,600 square foot warehouse for the storage of business forms and supplies, file SA-005-83; located at 1120 Lind Avenue S.W. ANDERSON, DELBERT B. & MINIETTA, MARY A. (A PARTNERSHIP) Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed 6,000 square foot office building, file R-013-83; located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 12, 1983, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : APRIL 1, 1983 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JERRY LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in on the 31st day of March, 1983. SIGNED: OF I?t11/ fa IM DiTicEc2i 0, 9Q O 11- D SEPZE O City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARI110 in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON 12, 19X3 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: R-013-83 Ti REZONE From To I SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To I] SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 4,600 SO FT WAREHOUSE SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots L PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM_ I I GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 11.20 LIND AVENUE S.W. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION 0 SIGNIFICANT ' NON-SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL. THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT f • FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): R-013-83 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-010-83 Description of Proposal:Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed 6,000 square foot office building. Proponent: Anderson, Delbert B. and Minietta, Mary A. (A Partnership) Location of Proposal: Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 16, and 23, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gary Norris, Ronald Nelson, Jerry Lind, Richard Houghton and David Clemens. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-010-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Delbert B. Anderson, DATED March 4, 1983. 2. Applications: Rezone (R-013-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Policy Development Department, Building and Zoning Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division and Utility Engineering Division. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and that the following requirements shall be complied with: 1. Positive outflow for storm drainage shall be provided. 2. Participation in street improvements on Grady Way between Maple Avenue S.W. and Rainier Avenue S. for additional capacity is required. Based on a fractional share of acreage, the amount charged for the subject property will be $6,493.50. SIGNATURES: onald G. Ne son i . C emens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: MARCH 28, 1983 APPEAL DATE: APRIL 11, 1983 Date circulated : MARCH 4, 1983 Comments due : MARCH 15, 1983 ENIVIRONIHE TAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 010 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : DELBEW B. ANDERSON & MARY A. MINIEI'IA (A PARTNERSHIP) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.34 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO B-1 FORA PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING. LOCATION : LOCArji AT 1123 MAPLE AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA : 0.34 ACRE BUILDING AREA (gross ) 6,000 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (? ) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :X 2 ) Direct/Inditect air quality : X 3 ) Water & water courses : X STORM n ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life :X 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : OFFICE east : SINGLE FAMILY south : SINGLE FAMILY west : SIN(,LE FAMILY t and use conflict POSSIBLE WITH SINGTF, FAMILY Viev obstruction : MINOR I Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings :l X 13 ) Trip ends ( HE ) : 74 TRIP ENDS traffic impacts : MINOR 14 ) Public services :X 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities :X STORM 17 ) Human health : X 18 ) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation : X 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : Signatures: 7-19' em Llo onald G. Nelson id R. Clemens Building Official Policy Development Director R)zchard C. Hought n, Public Works Director NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following project: ANDERSON, DELBERT B. & MINIETTA, MARY A. A PARTNERSHIP)(ECF-010-83) Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed 6,000 square foot office building, file R-013-83; located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by April 11, 1983. Published: March 28, 1983 rotd.•A. x Date circulated : March 4. 1983 Comments due : March 15, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - 010 - 83 M 8 R A 1983 APPLICATION No (s ) .REZONE (R-013-83) roucv DEVELOPMENT nFR?, PROPONENT : Delbert B. Anderson & Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. SITE AREA : 0.34 acre BUILDING AREA (gross ) 6,000 sq. ft. proposed) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : P7//// 4 ) Plant life : A U 5 ) Animal life :1 6 ) V(/ 7 ) Light & glare : rj V 8 ) Land Use ; north : e1`¢416 east : 74 4f/ south : west : 7/744(KAtLanduseconflicts : a/I c oleI View obstruction : Jf//, 9 ) Natural resources : T 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : V/ l fj dal 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : j/ J 97 47,5 traffic impacts : ftr 14 ) Public services : V 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : V/ -5- 6l 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS :4/-Pilt 7 6441/6 le 6 a a y il/tei 74 lento4/ af/0, 9/ 474 Mo. use Recommendation : ,ONSI S More Information Reviewed by : Title : Date : FORM: ERC-06 I DUI t,D i r-i Gl 1zoNi-Cq Date circulated : March 4. 19$3 Comments due : March 15, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 010 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) .REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B. Anderson 6 Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. SITE AREA : 0.34 acre BUILDING AREA (gross ) 6,000 sq. ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : proposed) IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE I _ INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : k 6 ) Noise : K 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : ig/e/.2),/le; View obstruction : ALA5/r..JdES- 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : x 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : K 15 ) Energy : V 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : V 19 ) Recreation : K 20 ) Archeology/history : x COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI < DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : G. litle : Date : 3-7-- 3 FORM: ERC-06 PiNK tS 4 B R v:if tot`{ Date circulated : March 4. 1983 Comments due : March 15, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIIEW SHEET ECF — 010 — 83 APPLICATION No (s ) .REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B. Anderson 6 Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. SITE AREA : 0.34 acre BUILDING AREA (gross ) 6,000 sq. ft. proposed) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 0- 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : U Cary of Renton ildmg(& ZomnggDeppttJ ) MAR 8 1983 Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : -1 I p1 it1e : (1?0 w Date : )'Y) lea(' 6 'r( -1r(3 FORM: ERC-06 rIft fr Date circulated : March 4. 1983 Comments due : March 15, 1983 ENVIRONMENITAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 010 - 81 APPLICATION No (s ) .REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B. Anderson S Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. SITE AREA : 0.34 acre BUILDING AREA (gross ) 6,000 sq. ft. proposed) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : r 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 1 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : MAR 4 1983 Recommendation DNSI 1/ DOS _ More Information Reviewed by : e .C t i t l e Date : l ` FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : March 4. 1983 Comments due : March 15, 1983 ENIVIRONIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECU — 010 — 83 APPLICATION No (s ) .REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B. Anderson b Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. SITE AREA : 0.34 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) 6,000 sq. ft. proposed) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (°b) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : r' 10 ) Risk of upset : r' 11 ) Population/Employment : l/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 'Z 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : r' 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI / DOS More Information__ Reviewed by : 1 itle : 077L/" 7 E1•16IA/L, ' Date : i /K3 FORM: ERC-06 TRc ff Date circulated : March 4. 1983 Comments due : March 15, 1983 E\IVIROKIHENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 010 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) .REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B. Anderson & Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B_-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. SITE AREA : 0.34 acre BUILDING AREA (gross ) 6,000 sq. ft. proposed) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : /, y..,, aF o ro i y s cjic...74 c-, h.•.+' r'r++' {«./,t 0 5tm,: / L/,k c--b /O ` dy re E a.c-e c r 1 v- J -.I OC Q—-) dl!e (.i ' 1\1I,Y "iJWE' fJ'}"' fY L C, I'/ ..., sF- Recommendation : DNSI — DOS More Information Reviewed by : - tle : 4 S 6' 2,, 4 Date : c3//j FORM: ERC-06 MEMORANDUM DATE : April 4, 1983 TO : Jerry Lind FROM : Gary Norris SUBJECT : Del-Mar Building -- Delbert Anderson & Minietta (R-013-83) The following is a pro-rata share of proposed improvements for additional capacity on Grady Way between Maple Ave. SW & Rainier Ave. SW. 1 . Improvements a. Signalization of Maple & Grady 100,000 b. Widening of Grady from Maple to Rainier approximately 7' 300,000 c. Channelization modifications 10,000 d. Street lighting 15,000 TOTAL 425,000 2. Cost Breakdown a. Area charges only account for one-half of widening of Grady from Maple to Rainier. b. Area charges cover all of remaining charges . c. Properties adjacent to Grady pay area charges plus the remaining one-half of widening. d. Total Area = 635,250 sq. ft. Area charge = $275,000/ 635,250 q• 0•43 9/ s ft. 3. Charge for subject property 0.4329/sq. ft. x (100' x 150 ') = $6,493.50 GAN:ad WING Date circulated : March 4. 1983 Comments due : March 15, 1983 E\VIROMIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - O10 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) .REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B. Anderson b Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TITLE : DEL-MAR BUILDING Brief Description of Project : Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. SITE AREA : 0.34 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) 6,000 sq. ft. proposed) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 1. 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : L 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : 61 G-Cab 2v't2,„/fYyam See, A44 Recommendation : DNSI DOS More InT'ormation_ Reviewed by : y. Title : Date : 3/7t---3 FORM: ERC-06 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA March 23, 1983 THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM: COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. OLD BUSINESS ECF-010-83 ANDERSON, DELBERT B. ac MINIETTA, MARY A. (A R-013-83 PARTNERSHIP) Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed 6,000 square foot office building; located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA March 16, 1983 THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM: COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. PENDING BUSINESS ECF-006-83 J. CLIFFORD GRAY SA-005-83 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a 4,600 square foot warehouse for the storage of business forms and supplies; located at 1120 Lind Avenue S.W. OLD BUSINESS ECF-061-81 RAMAC, INC. (PARK PLACE) B-256 Application for building permit to construct a 25,000 square foot office building; property located at the northeast corner of the intersection of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) and I-405. A proposed declaration of significance was published July 20, 1981. NEW BUSINESS ECF-010-83 ANDERSON, DELBERT B. & MINIETTA, MARY A. (A R-013-83 PARTNERSHIP) Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 for a proposed 6,000 square foot office building; located at 1123 Maple Avenue S.W. ECF-033-81 ONE VALLEY PLACE PROPERTIES FP-018-83 Application for final plat approval of a 12-lot plat for professional and general office use; located south of S. 43rd Street, east of SR-167 (Valley Freeway), and west of Talbot Road South. Memorandum of concurrence is required. INFORMATION Letter from Daniel Kellogg, Assistant City Attorney to the Planning and Development Committee regarding proposed revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance. 0021N RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPArt NIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — olo — 83 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-013-83) PROPONENT : Delbert B Anderson & Mary A. Minietta (A Partnership) PROJECT TI"LE : DEL-MAR BUILDING BRIEF DESCPIPTION OF PROJECT : Application to rezone 0.34 acre of property from R-1 to B- 1 for a proposed office building. LOCATION : Located at 1123 Maple Avenue S .W. TO : IPUBLI : WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 3-16-83 NGINEERING DIVISION l ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : t-]UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION I ( FIRE DREVENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS COMMENTS CR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON TUESDAY. MARCH 15, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPRCVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 o,ITY OF RENTC 1T FILE NO(S): R-013- 3 U E; ® `'BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ot0-83, ur N 9 MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Sine. s I, sd -ud4rrehensiva application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME MARY A. MINIETTA & FEES DELBERT B. ANDERSON A PARTNERSHIP illREZONE*(FROM R- 1 TO B- 1 ) 300. 00 ADDRESS II------- 15 S Grady Way, #117 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* ED Renton, WA 98055 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE 1i SITE PLAN APPROVAL El GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT 228-4064 No. of Cubic Yards: VARIANCE TECTNTACT PERSON From Section: Justification Required NAME John R. Ewing & Associates ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: I 622 S Central 1 ' SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Kent, WA 98031 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 852-6633 17-21 WAIVER A Justification Required) OWNERNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: George Little ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 329 Renton 5 Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL Renton, WA 98055 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 255-7587 ED Residential 0 Industrial EDCommercial D Mixed I LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 1123 Maple Ave. SW TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Ei FINAL residential R-1 PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: office building NUMBER OF SPACES: 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: TOTAL FEES 15, 000 sq. ft. 0. 34 ac. ciu 5'3: G'ILiTF'h;STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE A 4 [-.,'lI vi !! APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: APP IC TION DETERMINED TO BE: MAR 41983 Accepted CD Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: IOU Building Design Eng. Fire g Parks li Police Policy Dev. 121 Traffic Eng.Utilities REVISION 5/1982 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Lots 58 through 62, Block 27 of C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Add. Div. #1, Vol. 17 of Plats, page 74, records of King County, Washington. AFFIDAVIT 1 I, being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner, owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS Q DAY OF c- Aid 1 '1 ,, 19 8 . i/ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT CbeLke4lytt___ • 31411372) c-APy2i1242•1. Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner) pT-,) (ci07)97t. (1.0/- (6- e)- Address) ./J),(2-1401, CV 4l .Address) City) State) (Zip) €I 2 i kL Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Rezone of Little to commerce 1 G z.///_.yicc A F F I DAV I T Sir/`1/› c dzc..7re.i George Little being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this 25 day of February 19 83 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton A b. ame of ar Public) ig ature f Owner) 329 Renton S. Address) Address) Renton, Wa 98055 City) State) 255-7587 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By : Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 64 404 ' CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM F` '!"`''°® u N MAR 41983 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BUILLNNG/ZONING DEPT. Application No. F— 013-055 Environmental Checklist No. ( jf-' 010-44j0j PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Delbert B.f Anderson_& Mary A. Minietta (a Partnership) 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 15 S Grady Way, #117 Evergreen Bldg. Renton, WA 98055 228-4064 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Del-Mar Building 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Rezone the property to B-1; remove existing residence and build 6000 sq. ft. office building. 2- I 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal . as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Located at the corner of SW 12th St. & Maple Ave. S.W. across the alley from an existing Office Building in an area designated Business Park on the Comprehensive plan. The site has an older residence on it. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : within one year of issuance of permits 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals requirred for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : rezone building permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes . explain: no 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes . explain: no 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X Yam- MAYBE N l- b) Disruptions, displacements . compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YES— UWE Nl- d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES- MAYBE N l e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X YES RATTE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay. inlet or lake? MAYBE Explanation:The site will be graded and paved according to A approved site plan & building permit. r , k> ... . 3- a) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Vt RITE N0 b) The creation of objectionable odors? X VT MAYBE A-0— c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X VES MAYBE N0— Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YET— MABE NU— b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE HU— c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NiF d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE Nb e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE Nb— f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? X MATETE rW 1 ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YET— MAYBr AT— Explanation: The changes in absorption & drainage patterns will be addressed by an approved storm drainage plan using the existing system which connects to Grady Way or a proposed system to the west (Lind St. thence south to freeway ditch); possibly a combination of both systems. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? V t-- RXYDB AO-- b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora?X V!T MAYBE A-0-- c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X Vrr— MAYBE N d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? B X Explanation: Landscaping will be provided for the site & will possibly introduce new flora forms. Landscaping plan will be submitted at time of building permit application. 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: i a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms . insects or microfauna)? yam- MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES RATIII NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna?X VET MMAYFE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X VET—RTTTE WO-- Explanation: There is a possibility that some birds or small creatures will be displaced by the construction on the site. 16) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: There will be increased noise level during construction. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Qs-- MAYBE 11-0— Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X 1S- WYTE Explanation: Requesting rezone from R- 1 to B-1; Comprehensive Plan shows proposed business park designation. We are showing setbacks on Maple Ave. SW consistent with the business setbacks to the north & the L- 1 zoning to the south. 1(9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X VS MBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 1Tu- MAYBE W Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including. but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X Vt MAYBE WO-- Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution. density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YES- MAYBE AU— Explanation: 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES M YBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NB c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X MATTE Nb d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES— MATETE N e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NB f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X Y MAYBE NB Explanation: There will be new traffic generated by the new office building; parking will be provided on-site. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NB b) Police protection? X YES MBE W c) Schools?X YES MAYBE F d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services?X YES MWYbE NO Explanation: With the building of a new office building, there is a of possibility/a. need for increased governmental services. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YET— MAYBE No b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Y€- MAYBE ND-- Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? X Y PTATITE NU— b) Communications systems?X TIT— Mai BE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO k 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X VET— MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage?X YES WEE if f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The alterations required to utilities will be per City of Renton standards. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? VET— MAYBE WO-- Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE WO-- Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YET— MAYBE Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X Yt MAYBE Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent:! signed) name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 J RE John R.Ewing &AssociatEs civil EnginEE rs-land survEyors JN 29303 March 4, 1983 Roger Blaylock City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Ave. S Renton, WA 98055 RE: Justification for Rezone from R-1 to B-1 Dear Mr. Blaylock: The subject property, located at SW 12th St. and Maple Ave. SW, is potentially zoned Manufacturing Park on the Comprehensive Plan, therefore making the reclassification request appropriate. Our plan is generally consistent with the proposed zoning but not specifically consistent as to setbacks, due to smaller parcels created by prior platting. The setbacks and design are consistent with the property directly to the north of the site which was zoned B- 1 by Ordinance #1780 in 1959 and has been developed into an office building during the last two years. The intent to provide a business atmosphere would be consistent with the MP zoning as is the Gray Rezone #3666 located 150 feet to the west of the property. Should you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES 44 dr 4"% ;? a Carpenter CITY OF R NTON DC:mu 4 lFa 11 l:1 :'a MAR 41983 622 So.CEntral• KEnt,Washington 98031•(206)852-6633 4 I. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Fourth and Blanchard Building Seattle, Washington 98121 206-382-0400 REZONE CERTIFICATE Our No. 71993 Cheryl Henry & Associates 206 S.W. 43rd Street Renton, Washington 98055 Certificate for Filing Proposed Rezone Certificate Dear Sir: In the matter of the rezone submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said King County, to-wit: Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62, Block 27, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, records of King County, Washington. CITY OF RENTON Tiii ri 11!?- rg 11 MAR 41983 c A M E R J C First American Title Insurance Company FOURTH AND BLANCHARD BUILDING,SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98121 •(AREA 206)382-0400 ENDING • OF FILE FILE TITLE 013 lenivitia !sini%niativ, Page 2 Order No. 71993 VESTED IN: GEORGE LITTLE and IVONA LITTLE, his wife SUBJECT TO: 1. GENERAL TAXES Year: 1983 Amount Billed: $479.91 Amount Paid: None Amount Due: 479.91 Tax Account No. : 334040-4680-04 2. Pursuant to the automatic homestead provisions of R.C.W. 6.12, any conveyance or encumbrance of the property of a married person will require the joinder of both husband and wife providing said property qualifies as a homestead as defined in the statute. Execution of any conveyance or encumbrance of homestead property must be personally executed by both husband and wife and not by use of a power of attorney. Records examined to February 18, 1983 at 7:30 a.m. LLJ RICHARD A.,WEIDENBACH, Subdivision Manager ORDER NO. 71c11 ,) ESCROW NO. MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol_ 1 pG -4- P `-', ,L SD R vm uKlr" NA• 3 Z J ter I i 0 9 I 1z I v+ -c I6 1 5 , r4 ti r y!79 ibt' 19• . qz%/'it Z3 IitI 46' -i 9 - a- 6 Z.ZS Z O , J- 61 r I01,00 1 " 9 a sb1t ' Ali , 54 ss T--- I A ' 49f 5 3G Ike 6 4.7.., ST 1 u a, 44 a 6° S lay..? r od'• 4 3 Z y az 4 A l 8 o r b 5, Q j 80 if 151-/ r'Z%-11 ''' ' r19 1. # is 7 6'-r 1.••• " o .,< t 1 k sc 4' This map does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting said property; no liability 1 is assumed for variations in dimensions and location.