The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES 4542 CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 4542 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY Of RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF RENTON FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE YEARS 2025 AND 2026,AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE CURRENT CAPITAL FACILMES PLANS FOR ISSAQUAH,KENT,AND RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, on November 23, 2009, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5509, which removed many fees from the Renton Municipal Code and consolidated them into the City of Renton Fee Schedule brochure ("Fee Schedule"(; and WHEREAS,the Fee Schedule has been amended several times since 2009; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to approve an amended fee schedule for years 2025 and 2026; and WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule updating Section I. Maplewood Golf Course fees of the fee schedule; and WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule setting forth Refundable Security and Damage deposits under Section VI. Parks and Facilities Use and Rental of the fee schedule; and WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule updating Electrical fees under Section VI. Parks and Facilities Use and Rental of the fee schedule; and WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule updating Section Vill. Airport Charges fees of the fee schedule; and WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule to amend the permit fees b the same percentage change as in the most recent annual change of the P V P g B 8 RESOLUTION NO. 4542 Construction Cost Index published in the Engineering News Record, 3.1%for May 2024, in Section XII Development Fees of the fee schedule; and WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule setting permit fees for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or City-funded projects, in order to streamline permit processing; and WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule setting forth building permit fees for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) that are through the City of Renton's Permit Ready ADU (PRADU) program, as these are city provided plans that have undergone review; and WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule for site work and civil construction for Cleared or Disturbed area and New or Replaced Hard Surface to 500 square feet of a "Tier 0" Clearing and Grading Permit to align with thresholds established for Storm Water System Development Changes (SDC) under Site Work and Civil Construction Fees and Utility System Development Charges (SDC) in Section XII Development Fees of the fee schedule; and WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule to amend the Transportation Impact Fees for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) to those established by the methodology established in RMC 4-1-190 under Impact Fees in Section XII Development Fees of the fee schedule; and WHEREAS, the Kent, Issaquah, and Renton School Districts each requested that the City of Renton adopt their current Capital Facilities Plans; and 2 RESOLUTION NO. 4542 WHEREAS, the Renton Regional Fire Authority informed the City by letter dated July 29, 2024,that it would not make any changes for the 2025 Fee Schedule to the Capital Facilities Plan, Fire Impact Fee Rate Study, or the Fire Marshal's Office Fees that were previously adopted by the City; and WHEREAS, under Renton Municipal Code ("RMC") Section 4-1-190 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Department Regulations), the City of Renton has heretofore collected school impact fees on behalf of the Renton, Kent, and Issaquah school Districts, and collected fire impact fees on behalf of the Renton Regional Fire Authority (RRFA); and WHEREAS, it is further necessary to approve an amended fee schedule to amend the impact fees for Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School Districts, and to extend the existing applicable Fire Impact Fees and Fire Marshal Plan Review and Inspection Fees, pursuant to City Council's approval on September 23, 2024, under Impact Fees in Section XII Development Fees and Fire Marshal Fees under Section XIII Fire Department Fire Marshal Fees of the fee schedule; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Effective January 1, 2025, the Fee Schedule is amended and replaced with the 2025-2026 City of Renton Fee Schedule brochure,which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and adopted by this reference. An updated copy of the Fee Schedule, without strikethroughs and red text changes to black text, shall at all times be filed with the City Clerk as required by Ordinance No. 5509. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4542 SECTION II. The City Council hereby adopts by reference as if fully set forth herein the following Capital Facilities Plans: A. The 2024 Capital Facilities Plan of Issaquah School District No. 411, dated June 13, 2024, attached as Exhibit B; and B. The Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2023-2024 through 2029-2030, dated June 2024, attached as Exhibit C; and C. The 2024 Capital Facilities Plan of Renton School District No. 403, dated July 2024, attached as Exhibit D. SECTION III. The amended Fee Schedule adopted by Section I of this resolution shall be effective on January 1, 2025, and thereafter act as the City of Renton's Fee Schedule for all fees or charges referenced therein. The Fee Schedule shall remain in effect until amended or otherwise replaced by the City Council. In the event the Fee Schedule is not amended prior to the year 2027, the fees specified for the year 2026 shall continue to apply into and beyond 2027 until amended by the City Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL the 4th day of November, 2024. 1 Jas A. Seth,9wclerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 4th day of November, 2024. Armondo Pavone, Mayor 4 RESOLUTION NO. 4542 Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney OF Re' * RES- FIN:24RES026:10/23/2024 = AL * = SEAL i 00 5 RESOLUTION NO. 4542 EXHIBIT A 2025-2026 CITY OF RENTON FEE SCHEDULE A City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 i it i i i 2025-2026 i I City of Renton Fee Schedule i i ,K R 7 t W= Rev.Jan 2025 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 Tableof Contents Page SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES 1 SECTION II. MAPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE 2 SECTION III. CITY CENTER PARKING FEES 2 SECTION IV. AQUATIC FEES 3 SECTION V. CARCO THEATER (REPEALED) 3 SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL 3 SECTION VII. COMMUNITY CENTER PASS CARD & FEES 4 SECTION VIII. AIRPORT CHARGES 4 SECTION IX. ANIMAL LICENSES FEES- RMC S-4-2 4 SECTION X. BUSINESS LICENSES 5 SECTION XI.ADULT ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES 5 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES 6 Building Fees: 6 Land Use Review Fees: 8 Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: 10 Technology Surcharge Fee 14 Impact Fees: 14 Miscellaneous Fees: 15 SECTION XIII. FIRE DEPARMENT FIRE MARSHAL FEES (RFA) 15 SECTION XIV. MONETARY PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR INFRACTIONS ISSUED UNDER 17 THE AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 7.80 RCW City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION • 2025 2026 1. Maps: a. Zoning maps-standard 11x 17 $4 $4 It. Zoning maps-large 24 x 36 $12 $12 C. Comprehensive Plan map-standard 11 x 17 $4 $4 d. Comprehensive Plan map-large 24 x 36 $12 $12 e. Precinct maps $5 $5 2. Plat: a. First page $2 $2 b. Each additional page $1 $1 3. Photocopies: a. Each 8.5"x 11"or 8.5"x 14" $0.15 $0.15 b. Each 11"x 17" $0.20 $0.20 C. Each 8.5"x 11"or 8.5"x 14"color $0 25 $0 25 4. Budget: a. City's Budget $10 $10 b. City's Budget to other municipality or quasi-municipal corporation or other nonprofit charitable or education organization N/C N/C S. Audio or Video Recording Copes: a. Audio recording,each copy $2 $2 b. Video recording,each copy $2 $2 6. Regulations and Plans: a. Comprehensive Plan and Map $30 ', $30 b. Title IV,Development Regulations: (i) Text and Zoning Map $110 $110 (ii) Text only $100 $100 C. Individual Chapters of Development Regulations $10 $10 d. Renton Municipal Code(two volumes) $400 $400 e. Code Supplements,per year: (i) Titles I-III and VI-X $70 $70 (if) Title IV $70 $70 7. Miscellaneous Services: a. Certification and Notary Fees-Clerk's Certification $10 $10 b. Notary Public Attestation or Acknowledgement or as $10 $10 otherwise provided for in RCW 42.28.090,per signature C. Hold Harmless Agreements and other similar documents $20 $20 not otherwise provided for d. Lamination of licenses,pictures $6 $6 e. Community Development Block Grants(CDBG)Loan Program: (i) Application Fee $200 $200 (ii) Loan Origination Fee $150 or 0.25%of loan amount, $150 or 0.25%of loan amount, whichever is greater whichever is greater Closing Costs(including any legal fees) 50%oftotal actual costs 50%oftotal actual costs 8. Miscellaneous Charges for Police Services: a. Police Reports per page $0.15 $0.15 b. Record Checks(Written Response) $5 $5 C. Photographs-Digital on CD $2 $2 d. Photographs-black&white or color-Cost of developing film Cost Cost e. Fingerprint Cards $5 $5 (i) Each additional card $1 $1 9. Charges for Fire Documents: a. Fire reports per page $0.15 $0.15 b. Fire investigative report on CD $2 $2 C. First copy-black&white or color-Cost of developing film Cost Cost d. Additional copy-black&white or color-Cost ofdeveloping film Cost Cost ' 10. Computer Listings: a. City of Renton new business list $10 $30 I b. List of all business licenses $20 $20 c. Copies requested to be faxed,local number $3 $3 d. Copies requested to be faxed,long distance number (1) Multi-family:2 units,Duplexes,&Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)' $10 $10 (if) Six(6)or more pages(ten(10)page limit) $20 $20 12. Utility Fee: a. Special Request Water Meter Reading $30 $30 b. Utility New Account Setup $25 $25 c. Utility Billing Account Transfer(tenant billing form) $5 $5 d. Water utility outstanding balance search requested by $25 $25 fax,messenger,or letter e Water turn offand turn on fee $60 $60 f Water utility shutoff list processing fee $60 $60 g Water delinquent late fee of 1(rA of past due charges but not less than fifty cents 10% 10% h Water after hours service charge to turn on water after 3 p.m.(additional fee) $90 $90 i Tenant notification fee for impending shutoff of water per tenant $5 $5 j Petition filing fee for stormwater appeal from category determination and assessment $75 $75 it Meter Accuracy Reading-For testing 3/4"through 2"meter $40 $40 1 Meter Accuracy Reading-For testing meters larger than 2" Time&Materials,requires Time&Materials,requires a$60 refundable deposit a$60 refundable deposit prior to test prior to test 12. Schedule of Fines for False Alarms-Security/Burglar:(effective February 1,2019) a. One-time Registration Fee $25 $25 b. Annual Registration Renewal N/C N/C C. First False Alarm in a registration year' N/C N/C d. Second False Alarm in a registration year' $100 $100 e. Third or more False Alarm in a registration year $2S0 $250 I. Late Payment Fee $25 $25 g. Unregistered Alarm System Fee $50 $50 A registration year shall mean January 1 thru December 31 each year. 13. NSF Check Fees $25 $25 14. Veteran Park Tile:Three lines $75 $75 t City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 ,SECTION • • • 2025 2026 15. Electronic Records"z": a. Photocopies or printed copies of electronic records,per page $0.15 $0.15 b. Scanning paper records,per page $0.10 $0.10 C. Electronic files or attachments uploaded for electronic delivery(email,cloud-based data storage service,or other means of electronic delivery), $0.05 $0.05 for each four(4)files d. Transmission of records in an electronic format or for the use of agency equipment to send the records electronically,per gigabyte(GB) $0.10 $0.10 e. Body worn camera footage redaction,per minute of documented stafftime,plus other documented costs of redaction $0.64 $0.64 'The charges identified in RCW 42.56.120(3)(b)(and referenced above)may be combined to the extent that more than one type of charge applies to copies produced in response to a particular request.The actual cost of a"digital storage media or device provided by the agency.Alternatively,the City may charge a flat fee of up to$2 for the entire request as long as the cost of uploading and transmitting the electronic records is reasonably estimated to equal or exceed that amount.Only one$2 flat fee per request is authorized for electronic records produced in installments.When records are provided electronically on a CD,DVD,thumb drive,flash drive,or other electronic device,the requestor will be charged for the cost of the electronic storage device.The City may charge an actual-cost service charge for requests that require use of IT expertise to prepare data compilations or provide customized electronic access services when not used by the City for other purposes.A cost estimate and explanation will be provided to the requester before incurring the costs. z Option to waive charges.The City may waive charges associated with fulfilling a request.The decision will be based on various factors,including the volume and format of the responsive documents.The decision to assess fees for fulfilling a public records request shall be made on a consistent and equitable basis,dependent primarily upon the amount of staff time required for copying,scanning,shipping,uploading,and/or transmitting the records associated with fulfilling a request. 'Certified copies.If the requestor is seeking a certified copy of a City record,an additional charge of$1.00 per each complete document may be applied to cover the additional expense and time required for certification. 16. Document Recording Fees: a. The applicant shall pay all document recording fees charged by King county and all administrative fees charged by the title company for Actual Costs Actual Costs processing.Payment in full shall by submitted to the City before documents are sent for recording. b. Miscellaneous charges associated with document recording such as courier fees Actual Costs Actual Costs 17. Publication Fees: The applicant shall pay all Publication fees charged by publication outlet used by the City(The Seattle Times or equivalent).Payment in full shall be Actual Costs Actual Costs made to the City prior to public hearing,permit approval or issuance,whichever comes first. 'Should Section 1 fees due total less than$4.00 and no other fee is due to the City at the same time,the department administrator may authorize to waive the entire amount due at their discretion. 1. Green Fees: a. Weekday: (1) 18 Hole $ $50 $3355 $37 (ii) 9 Hole (iii) 18 Hole,Senior $40 $ (iv) 9 Hole,Senior 32 $30 $32 (v) 18 Hole,Junior $26 $28 (vi) 9 Hole,Junior $20 $22 b. Weekend: (1) 18 Hole $55 $60 (ii) 9 Hale $40 $42 For purposes of this section,"weekend'shall mean Friday,Saturday,and Sunday."Weekday"shall mean the remaining four days of the week."Junior"shall mean ages 17 and under,"Senior"shall mean ages 62 and over. Off-season and promotional rates determined by management;posted on website. 2. Club Rental a. Regular $35 $35 b. Premium $65 $65 3. Golf Cart Fees: a. 18 Hole $38 $40 b. 18 Hole Single Rider $28 $30 C. 9 Hole $26 $28 d. 9 Hole Single Rider $ $20 e. Trail Fee $2200 $20 f. Half Cart,18 Hole $19 $20 g. Half Cart,9 Hole $13 $14 4. Driving Range Fees: a. Large Bucket $14 $15 b. Small Bucket $11 $12 C. Warm-up Bucket $7 $7 5. Lesson Fees: a. 1/2 Hour Private $60 $ b. 1 Hour Private 95 $90 $95 C. 1/2 Hour Series Private $ $ d. 1 Hour Series Private $330 0 $340 0 e. GroupSeries $160 $180 f. 1/2 Hour Private,Junior $40 $45 g. Playing Lesson(3-hole minimum/9-hole maximum)per hole $30 $35 ISECTION Ill.CITY CENTER PARKING FEES 20251 1. City Center Parking Garage Fees': Parking rates for retail parking will be as follows: a. Zero(0)-two(2)hours N/C N/C b. Two(2)-four(4)hours $2 $2 C. Four(4)-six(6)hours $4 $4 d. Six(6)-(10)hours $6 $6 e. 10 hours or more $10 $10 f. Monthly pass-holders,tax included $35 $35 'Parking garage fees for periods of up to 10 hours are waived by Ord 6139 until 12/31/2025. 2 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 'SECTION • 2025 2026 1. Admission for the Aquatic Center shall be as follows: a. Regular Session: (i) Infants-under 1year N/C N/C (ii) Youth-1 to 4 years $8 $8 (iii) Ages 5 and up $16 $16 (iv) Lap swim-water walking only $7 $7 (v) Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 b. Canopy Rental Fees:(includes canopy and admission for one leisure swim session): (i) Henry Moses Party Tent#1 (10'x 20'for up to twenty-five(25)guests on wave pool): (1) Resident Rate,per session $600 $600 (2) Non-resident Rate,per session $700 $700 (h) Henry Moses Parry Tent#2 (10'x 20'for up to twenty-five(25)guests): (1) Resident Rate $500 $500 (2) Non-Resident Rate $600 $600 (iii) Henry Moses Party Tent#3 (10'x 10'for up to ten(10)guests): (1) Resident Rate,per session $250 $250 (2) Non-resident Rate,per session $300 $300 C. Resident Rate all inclusive' $3,800 $3,800 d. Non-resident Rate all inclusive' $4,800 $4,800 e. Swim Lesson Program:Fees and associated descriptions are published in the"Let's Go Renton"Renton Activities Guide f. End-of-year School Party Rentals: (i) Renton School District (1) 001-299 students $1,900 $1,900 (2) 300-399 students $2,250 $2,250 (3) 400-499 students $2,400 $2,400 (4) 500-599 students $2,550 $2,550 (ii) Other Schools and Districts (1) 001-299 students $2,450 $2,450 (2) 300-399 students $2,850 $2,850 (3) 400-499 students $3,150 $3,150 (4) 500-599 students $3,360 $3,360 'Sales tax not included in the rental fee 2. Boat Launch Rates: a. Daily resident-7 days a week $20 $20 b. Daily Non-resident-7 days a week $25 $25 C. Overnight resident-7 days a week $25 $25 d. Overnight Non-resident-7 days a week $45 $45 e. Annual parking boat launch permit-resident $70 $70 f. Annual parking boat launch permit-non-resident $130 $130 9. Fishing Tournaments at Coulon Beach(additional rental fee if using the Pavilion area for weigh in and or electricity at the current rental rate)per event (i) Resident rate $110 $110 (ii) Non-resident rate $115 $115 i;SECTION V.CARCO THEATER(REPEALED) 2025 2026 SECTIONAND RENTAL 1. Outlying Picnic Shelters(Cedar River Trail,Liberty Park,Philip Arnold Park,Teasdale Park and Heritage Park)Maximum of 50 people: a. Resident 10am-7pm $1S0 $150 b. Non-resident 10am-7pm $290 $290 c. Refundable Security and Damage deposit $300 $100 2. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters(South 111,South#2 and Creekside)Maximum of 75 people: a. Resident 10am-7pm $150 $150 b. Non-resident 10am-7pm $290 $290 e. South Shelters 1&2 Resident rate $310 $310 I. South Shelters 1&2 Non-resident rate $610 $610 g. Refundable Security and Damage deposit $100 $100 3. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters(North Shelter): '. a. Resident 10am-7pm $200 ' $200 b. Non-resident 10am-7pm $360 $360 C. Refundable Security and Damage deposit $300 $300 4. Basketball wort rate per hour(Tournament Play Only): a. Resident rate $25 $25 b. Non-resident rate $30 $30 c Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 5, Open Space Area in Me Parks(Cascade,Teesdale,Philip Arnold,Cedar River,Earlington,Gene Coulon,Glencoe,Kennydale Lions,Sunset,and Riverview Parks): �. a. Resident rate per hour $25 $25 b. Non-resident rate per hour 30 $85 $85 C. Temporary Event Permit Fee $ $ � d. Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 6. Piano Park Open Space Event Rental a. Full day rental 10am-7pm $500 $500 b. Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 7. Photo Shoots per hour: a. Commercial Film and Photo Shoots per hour $300 $300 8. Electrical Spider Box rental: a. Electrical spider box rental per box,per event,with special event approval $200 $200 3 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 'SECTION •FACILITIES USE AND • •) 2025 2026 9. Athletic Field Rental,Lights and Prep Fees: a. Sports field rental per hour-resident $30 $30 b. Sports field rental per hour-non-resident $36 $36 C. Renton Area Youth Sports Agencies,per hour $8 $8 d. Field prep for softball/baseball-resident per occurrence $35 $35 e. Field prep for soccer-resident per occurrence $50 $50 f. Custom Field prep-resident per occurrence $100 $100 S. Field prep for softball/baseball-non-resident per occurrence $40 $40 h. Field prep for soccer-non-resident per occurrence $55 $55 I. Custom Field prep-non-resident per occurrence $100 $100 j. Field lights all sports-resident per hour $30 $30 k. Field lights all sports-non-resident per hour $36 $36 1. Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 10. Banquet&Classroom Rental-Community Center&Senior Activity Center: a. Friday evening 5 hour minimum-resident $750 $750 b. Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum-resident $1 500 $ 500 C. Extra hours-per hour-resident $150 $150 d. Friday 5 hour minimum-non-resident $900 $900 e. Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum-non-resident $1,800 $1,800 f. Extra hours-per hour-non-resident $180 $180 g Banquet Room-Mon-Fri-daytime-resident/hr 3 hour min $100 $100 In Banquet Room-Mon-Fri-daytime-non-resident/hr 3 hour min $120 $120 1. Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 j. Cancellation Fee-Less than 90 days $550 $550 21. Classroom and Gymnasium Rental-Renton Community Center: a. Resident single gym athletic-per hour $50 $50 b. Non-resident single gym athletic-per hour $60 $60 C. Resident double gym athletic-per hour $100 $100 d. Nan-resident double gym athletic-per hour $120 $120 e. Resident single gym non-athletic $1,000 $1,000 f. Non-resident single gym non-athletic $1,200 $1,200 S. Resident double gym non-athletic $2,000 In. Non-resident double $2,00 gym non-athletic $2,400 $2,400 I. Carpet fee single gym-resident&non-resident $325 $325 j. Carpet fee double gym-resident&non-resident $650 $650 k. Classroom resident $40 $40 I. Classroom Non-resident $48 $48 12. Facility Rental-Neighborhood Center: a. Meeting room-resident $40 $40 b. Gymnasium-resident $40 $40 C. Meeting room-non-resident $48 $48 d. Gymnasium-non-resident $48 $48 e. Refundable Security and Damage deposit $750 $750 13. Farmer's Market a. 10x10 Lot $40 $40 b. Half Lot $20 $20 C. Application fee $30 $30 d. Electrical fee $10 $10 14. Parklet Rentals a.Parklet Rental including Installation per Occurrence''' $500 $73/month,$876/year 'Long-Term Right of Way Permit will be required if located within the City Right of Way.See Section XII,Development Fees,of the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure:Subsection a of subsection 3,Site Work,Utilities,and Right of Way Fees :Parklet rental is subject to sales tax 15. Outlying Park Buildings(Tiffany Park Building,Kennydale Park Building,Teesdale Park Building) a. 6-hour block-resident $2 $2 b. 6-hour block-non-resident $240 0 $240 0 C. Deposit resident&non-resident $250 $250 d. Non-profit fee-per hour(no deposit required) $40 $40 e. Refundable Security and Damage deposit 750$ $750 16. Renton History Museum a. Adult(18yrs+up) $5 $5 b. Child 19 vrs-17 rs $2 $2 :SECTION • •: FEES 2025 Fees and associated descriptions are published and available in the"Let's Go Renton"Recreation Guide- SECTION Vill.AIRPORTs2026 1. Airport Fuel Flow Charge: per gallon $0 OS $0 08 2. JetA Fuel Flow Charge: per gallon $0 10 $010 3. T-Hangar Wahlist,one time fee $100 $100 4 T-Hangar,Move-in Fee(non-refundable) $250 $250 5 T-Hangar Rental Space(monthly)(plus leasehold excise tax) $580 $580 i Tie-down Waitlist,one time fee $25 $25 7 Tie-down Rental Space(monthly)(plus leasehold excise tax) $18560 $18560 8. Penalty for violation of Minimum Standards/Airport Rules&Regulations(each occurrence) $500 $500 9. Penalty for Movement Area Incursions(each occurrence),assessed to sponsor/tenant $500 $500 30 Lost gate card fee per occurrence $50 $50 11 Transient airplane parking(daily) $8 $B i SECTION • 1. Altered Animal Annual License $30 $30 2. Unaltered Animal Annual License $50 $50 3. Economically Qualified Resident Special Lifetime License $0 $0 4. Duplicate Tag $10 $10 'Please note,impounded animals are subject to license fees,microchipping costs,and other out-of-pocket costs as specified in RMC 6-6-2. I i I i 4 a City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION 1. General Business License: a. Registration Fee $150 $150 b. Per hour fee,for each worker hour $0,0352 $0.0352 b. Appeal of Business License Decision $250 $250 .Per hour rate shall be adjusted every other year by Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton,All Items,Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers(also known as CPI-W)ending August 31,for the same two year period. 2. Short Term Employment within the City: a. A temporary ninety(90)day license maybe purchased for each FTE on a temporary job' $50 $50 _ 'Not to exceed 270 consecutive days 2. Penalties: a. The penalty to reinstate an expired business license $50 $50 b. The penalty for failure to obtain a business license $250 $250 C. Failure to pay the license fee within one day after the day on which it is due and payable pu rsuant to subsection C7 of Chapter 5 ofthe RMC shall render the business enterprise subject to a penalty of(5%)ofthe amount of the license fee for the first month ofthe delinquency and an 5%-15% 5%-15% additional penalty of(5%)for each succeeding month of delinquency,but not exceeding a total penalty of(15%)ofthe amount of such license fee. "Payment of all license fee amounts still owing for the last three(3)years,plus a penalty of(20%)per annum for all amounts owing,plus any accounting,legal or administrative expenses incurred by the City in determining the nonreporting,or the unpaid portion over the last(3)years or in collecting the tax and or oenallX. SECTION ADULT2025 2026 1. Every person applying for a adult entertainment license shall pay the applicable nonrefundable application fee: a. Adult Entertainment Business License $750 $750 b. Entertainer $75 $75 C. Manager $75 $75 d. License Replacement $10 $10 2. Penalties: a. Civil Penalty,per violation $1,000 $1,000 5 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTIONDEVELOPMENT FEES 20252026 1. Building Fees: a. Building and Demolition Permit Fees': (i) Base Fee/Valuation$1.00 to$500.00 $43 $44 (ii) Valuation$501.00 to$2,000.00 $43+$4.87 x each $44+$7.98 x each $100 value $100 value (iii) Valuation$2001.00 to 25,000.00 $116.06+$22.30 x each $119.66 x$22.99 each $1,000 value $1,000 value (iv) Valuation$25,001.00 to$50,000.00 $628.97+$16.05 x each$1,000 $648.47+$16.55 x each$1,000 value value (v) Valuation$50,001.00 to$100,000.00 $1,029.90+$11.19 x each $1,062.23+$11.53 x each $1,000 value $1,000 value (vi) Valuation$100,001.00 to$500,000.00 $1,589.40+$8.90 x each $1,638.89+$9.17 x each $1,000 value $1,000 value (vii) Valuation$500,001.00 to$1,000,000.00 $5,149.40+$7.56 x each $5,308.23+$7.79 x each $1,000 value $1,000 value (viii) Valuation$1,000,001.00 and up $8,928.40+$5.83 x each $9,205.04+$6.02 x each + $1,000 value $1,000 value 'This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. b• Combination Building Permit Fees" (i) Plumbing up to 3,000 sq ft $327 $337 (ii) Plumbing over 3,000 sq ft $359 $370 (iii) Mechanical up to 3,000 sq ft $262 $270 (iv) Mechanical over 3,000 sq ft $294 $303 (v) Electrical up to 3,000 sq ft $294 $303 (vi) Electrical over 3,000 sq ft $359 $370 'Combination Building Permit fees are required for each new single family residential structure. z This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. C. Building Plan Check Fee''' (i) Initial Building Plan Check Fee' 65%of permit fee 65%of permit fee (ii) Additional Building Plan Check Fee 50%of initial plan Check Fee 50%of initial plan Check Fee 'This fee shall be$0 for Accessory Dwelling Units(ADU)that are through the City of Renton's Permit Ready ADU(PRADU)Program as they have already been reviewed. 'Building Plan Check Fee is in addition to the building permit fees,demolition permit fees,and combination building permit fees.The plan check fee is equal to 65%of the building permit fee,or the demolition permit fee,or the combination building permit fee. Includes three(3)review cycles. 'This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. d. State Building Code Fee: (i) Non-residential projects $25 $25 (ii) Residential projects: (1) Base Residential Fee $6.50 $6.50 (2) Each additional unit after first unit $2 $2 e. Electrical Permit Fees': (i) Residential Fees-Single-Family and Duplex (1) New Service-Single Family and Duplex (a) Up to 200 AMP $277 $286 (b) Over 200 AMP $294 $303 (2) Service Changes/New Circuits-Single Family and Duplex: (a) Change up to 200 AMP $215 $222 (b) Change over 200 AMP $228 $235 (c) Any new circuits added to above price is per each up to a maximum of$80.00 $27 $28 (d) Minimum fee for remodel/addition of new circuits without a service charge $215 $222 (e) Cooling system circuit for new or replaced appliance $96 $99 (ii) Multi-Family,Commercial and Industrial Fees:Fees based on value of work. (1) $1.00 to$500.00 $85 $88 (2) $500.01 to$1,000.00 $85+4.95%of value $88+5.03%of value (3) $1,000.01 to 5,000.00 $109.75+4.95%of value $113.15+5.24%of value (4) $5,000.01 to$50,000.00 $313.20+2.66%of value $322.91+2.741%of value (5) $50,000.01 to$250,000.00 $1,508.46+1.76%of value $1,555.22+1.81%of value (6) $250,000.01 to$1,000,000.00 $5,021.92+1.500/of value $5,177.60+1.55%of value (7) $1,000,000.01 and up $16,265+03+0.55%of value $16,769.25+0.56%of value (iii) Temporary Electrical Services $215 $222 (iv) Miscellaneous Electrical Fees (1) Job Trailers $215 $222 (2) Signs per each $215 $222 (3) Mobile Homes $215 $222 (4) Low Voltage Work(e.g.,alarm systems;thermostats;computer,data,or phone lines;fiber optics,cable 50%of commercial fees 50%of commercial fees television,etc.) Minimum$209 Minimum$209 (5) Residential Photovoltaic(PV)Solar Panel (a) Review Fee $139 $143 (b) Permit fee $215 $222 'Exemption:Residential telephone communication systems,thermostats,security systems,and cable television installations are exempt from fees f• House Moving'-minimum per hour Inspection Fee: $196 $202 'This covers only the Building Section inspection of the structure prior to move.There is a separate additional fee charged by the Public Works Department to cover the actual house move permit.A building permit is also required in order to site the structure on the new site. g. Inspection Fee For Condominium Conversions $196 on 1st unit/$25 each $202 on 1st unit/$26 each add'I unit add'I unit 6 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 • • t) 202S 2026 1. Building Fees:(Continued) h• Manufactured/Mobile Home Installation Fees': (i) Within a manufactured home park $196 $202 (i1) Outside of a manufactured home park Building Permit Fees Building Permit Fees 1 Includes plan review and inspection fees for the foundation(electrical,plumbing,mechanical,sewer and water connection fees are in addition to the below amounts). i• Mechanical Permit Fees:' (i) Residential-Mechanical Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: $67 $69 (1) Heating system(furnace,heat pump,suspended heater,fireplace,wood stove,etc.).A/C system(air conditioner, $27 $28 chiller or Air Handling Unit(VAV)including ducts and vents) (2) Boiler or Compressor $27 $28 (3) Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories,or for which $27 $28 no other fee is listed in this code (4) Ventilation/exhaust fan $27 $28 (5) Fuel Gas Piping(each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) $27 $28 (ii) Commercial or Multi-Family-Mechanical Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: $99 $102 (1) Heating system(furnace,heat pump,suspended heater,fireplace,wood stove,etc.).A/C system(air conditioner, $46 $47 chiller or Air Handling Unit(VAV)including ducts and vents) (2) Boiler or Compressor $99 $102 (3) Refrigeration System $99 $102 (4) Commercial Hood:Installation of each served by a mechanical exhaust,including the ducts for such hood each $99 $102 (5) Incinerator:Installation or relocation of each $131 $135 (6) Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories,or for which $46 $47 no other fee is listed in this code (7) Fuel Gas Piping(each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) $46 $47 a J. Plumbing Permit Fees:1 (i) Residential-Plumbing Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: $67 $69 (1) Per plumbing fixture(e.g.,sink,shower,toilet,dishwasher,tub,etc.)or set of fixtures on one trap $12 $12 (2) Water Service:For meter to house $12 $12 (3) Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping $12 $12 (4) Per drain for rainwater systems $12 $12 (5) Per lawn sprinkler system,includes backflow,prevention $12 $12 (6) Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks,vats,etc. $12 $12 (7) Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment $12 $12 (8) Fuel Gas Piping:(each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) $27 $28 (ii) Commercial or Multi-Family:Plumbing Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: $99 $102 (1) Per plumbing fixture(e.g.,sink,shower,toilet,dishwasher,tub,etc.)or set of fixtures on one trap $20 $21 (2) Water Service:For meter to building $20 $21 (3) Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping $20 $21 (4) Per drain for rainwater systems $20 $21 (5) Per lawn sprinkler system,includes backflow prevention $20 $21 (6) Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks,vats,etc. $20 $21 (7) Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment $20 $21 (8) Fuel Gas Piping:(each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) $34 $35 (9) Medical Gas Piping:(each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) $99 $102 a k. Sign Permit Fees': (i) Permanent Signs: (1) Roof,projecting,awning,canopy,marquee,and wall signs $327 $337 '.. (2) Freestanding ground and pole signs $327 $337 (ii) Temporary and Portable Signs: (1) Real Estate Directional Signs,pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J2,permit valid for a 12-months period $99 $102 (2) Grand Opening Event Signs,pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J6d(i) $99 $102 (3) Event Signs,pursuant to RMC 44-10016d(ii)and(iii)per sign,per promotion $65 $67 (4) A-Frame Signs,pursuant to RMC 4-4-100JS Charge is for the first sign,all subsequent signs are$50.00 $163 $168 (5) Commercial Property Real Estate Banner each sign permit is valid for 12 months. $99 $102 (6) Decorative Flags fee is per entrance and valid until flag(s)are removed $99 $102 'This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. I. I. Miscellaneous Fees: (i) Inspection Fees: (1) Minimum Housing Inspection $163 $168 (2) WABO-Adult Family Home;Misc building inspection $163 $168 (3) Reinspection Fee;Misc building inspection $163 $168 (4) After hours inspection' $175/hr $175/hr (ii) Plan Review Fees': (1) Electrical,Plumbing,or Mechanical Permits(percentage of permit fee) 40% 40% (2) Additional Plan Review Fees:Over three review cycles(percentage of plan review fee) 50% 50% (3) Miscellaneous Plan Review:hourly fee. $158 hr 4 Site Plan Zonin Review' / $158mi ( ) / g 5%of Permit Fee 5%of Permit Fee (5) Engineering Review' 5%of Permit Fee 5%of Permit Fee (iii) Work commencing before permit Issuance:Where work for which the permit is required is started prior to obtaining 2 X Permit Fee 2 X Permit Fee the permit,a special investigation fee in an amount equal to twice the permit fee shall be charged.The special investieation fee shall be oaid in addition to the reauired Dermit fees.' 1 This fee shall be$0 for Accessory Dwelling Units(ADU)that are through the City of Renton's Permit Ready ADU(PRADU)Program as they have already been reviewed. 'Applies to inspection performed on Saturdays,Sundays,observed City of Renton holidays,and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside the hours of 7:OOAM to 3:30PM 'This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. 7 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 iSECTION XII.DEVELOPMENT FEES(C• •) 2025 2026 2. Land Use Review Fees: a. General Land Use Review''': (i) Additional Animals Permit $58 $60 (ii) Address Change $124 $128 (iii) Annexation: (1) Less than 10 acres $6,083 $6,272 (2) 10 acres or more $6,083 $6,272 (iv) Appeal of: (1) Hearing Examiner's Decision $577 $595 (2) Administrative Decision $577 $595 (3) Environmental Decision $577 $595 (v) Binding Site Plan (1) Preliminary $3,057 $3,152 (2) Final $6,114 $6,304 (vi) Code Text Amendment (vii) Comprehensive Plan Map or Text Amendment(each) $6,083 $6,272 (viii) Conditional Use Permit: (1) HEX $3,825 $3,944 (2) Administrative $1,856 $1,914 (3) Revision(minor,administrative) 50%of Application Fee 50%of Application Fee (4) Revision(major) Application fee Application Fee (ix) Critical Areas Exemption N/C N/C (x) Critical Areas Permit $1,454 $1,499 Critical Areas Review Fee: for those projects that propose impacts to critical areas and will be billed at the cost of 100%of contract cost 100%of contract cost (xi) contract biologist's review.' (xii) Development Agreement $11,588 $11,947 (xiii) Environmental Impact Statement Cost include the coordination,review and appeal.Draft and Final' 100%of cost 100%of cost (xiv) Environmental Checklist Review $1,856 $1,914 (xv) Environmental(SEPA)Addendum $1,856 $1,914 ("I) Fence Permit(special) $186 $192 (xvii) Grading and Filling Permit(Hearing Examiner) $6,268 $6,462 (xviii) Home Occupation Permit(Special) $230 $230 (xix) Landscape Review Fee $186 $192 (xx) Legal Lot Segregation N/C N/C (xxi) Lot Consolidation $588 $606 (xxii) Lot Line Adjustment $1,268 $1,307 (xxiii) Manufactured/Mobile Home Park: (1) Tentative $1,268 $1,307 (2) Preliminary $3,763 $3,880 (3) Final $1,856 $1,914 (xxiv) Open Space Classification Request $175 $180 (xxv) Plats: (1) Preliminary Short Plat $6,268 $6,462 (2) Final Short Plat $3,134 $3,231 (3) Preliminary Plat $12,547 $12,936 (4) Final Plat $6,268 $6,462 (5) Minor Plat Amendment 50%of Application Fee 50%of Application Fee (6) Major Plat Amendment Application Fee Application Fee (xxvi) Planned Urban Development: (1) Preliminary Plan $6,268 $6,462 (2) Final Plan $3,124 $3,221 (xxvii) Reasonable Use Exception: (1) In conjunction with land use permit $588 $606 (2) Stand alone $1,784 $1,839 (xxviii) Public Arts Exemption N/C N/C (xxix) Rezone $6,083 $6,272 (xxx) Routine Vegetation Management Permit without Critical Areas $124 $128 (xxxi) Shoreline-Related Permits: (1) Shoreline Permit Exemption N/C N/C (2) Substantial Development Permit $3,124 $3,221 (3) Conditional Use Permit $3,763 $3,880 (4) Variance $3,763 $3,880 (xxxii) Site Development Plan(Site Plan or Master Plan which includes design review fee for projects subject to RMC 4-3-100): (1) Hearing Examiner Review $4,402 $4,538 (2) Administrative Review $3,124 $3,221 (3) Modification(minor,administrative) 50%of Application Fee 50%of Application Fee (4) Modification(major)required new application and repayment of fee required Application Fees Application Fees (xxxiii) Small Cell Permit,per site $588 $606 (xxxiv) Special Permit(Hearing Examiner) $3,124 $3,221 (xxxv) Street Naming(Honorary) (1) Application $289 $298 (2) Installation $289 $298 '.. (xxxvi) Temporary Use Permits: (1)Tier 1 $124 $128 (2)Tier 2 $237 $244 (xxxvii) Variance(per each variance requested)Administrative or Hearing Examiner $1,536 $1,584 (xxxviii) Waiver or Modification of Code Requirements cost is per request $299 $308 (xxxix) Zoning Compliance Letter $557 $574 8 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 ,SECTIONDEVELOPMENT FEES(C• • 12026 2. Land Use Review Fees: (Continued) a. General Land Use Review' (Continued) 'Exception for Projects Vested in the County:For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County,the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply,and is hereby adopted by reference.A copy of that fee schedule has been filed with the City Clerk and is available at the City Clerk's office for public review. 'Per RMC 4-3-050F7,the City may charge and collect fees from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in review of plans,studies,monitoring reports and other documents related to evaluation of impacts to or hazards from critical areas and subsequent code-required monitoring. 'When the City is the lead agency for a proposal requiring an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)and the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)determines that the EIS shall be prepared, the City may charge and collect a reasonable fee from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in preparing the EIS.The ERC shall advise the applicant(s)of the projected costs for the EIS prior to actual preparation;the applicant shall post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs.The ERC may determine that the City will contract directly with a consultant for preparation of an EIS,or a portion of the EIS,and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant.Such consultants shall be selected by mutual agreement of the City and applicant after a call for proposals.If a proposal is modified so that an EIS is no longer required,the ERC shall refund any fees collected under this subsection which remain after incurred costs are paid.The City may collect a reasonable fee from an applicant to cover the cost of meeting the public notice requirements of this Title relating to the applicant's proposal.The City shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency.The City may charge any person for copies of any document prepared under this Title,and for mailing the document,in a manner provided by chapter 42.17 RCW. 'Prior to issuance of a small cell permit,the applicant shall pay the actual administrative expenses incurred by the City that are directly related to the City's review of the application,including plan inspection,and approval,as authorized by RCW 35.21.860(1)(b),as may be amended. 5 This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. b. Miscellaneous Fees': (i) Permit review staff overtime(applies only if permit review is requested by the applicant to be performed on $175/hr $175/hr Saturdays,Sundays,observed City of Renton holidays,and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside of the hours of city staff regular work schedule) 'Exception for Projects Vested in the County:For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County,the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply,and is hereby adopted by reference.A copy of that fee schedule has been filed with the City Clerk and is available at the City Clerk's office for public review. SEICTION X111.DEVELOPMENT • ON 9 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 3. Site Work,Utilities,and Right of Way Fees: a. Site Work and Civil Construction Fees',a,s,9: (i) Clearing,Grading,Excavation,and Mining Permits and License Fees:Fees shall be based on the highest tier triggered. Tier Grade and Filfilargerl leared or Disturbed Area New or Replaced Hard Surface 0 <50 <500 sf <500 sf 1 50 c -4500 sf-<3/4 acre 50o sf-4,999 sf 2 500c -4 3/4 ac-<1ac 5,000 sf-<1 ac 3 5,000c -4 1ac-<2.5 ac Sac-<2.5 ac 4 50,000c - 2.5 ac-<5 ac 2.5 ac-<5 ac 5 100,000 c a 5 ac and larger 5 ac and larger (1) Review/Intake Fee: (a) Tier 0(no permit required) N/A N/A (b) Tier 1 $536 $553 (c) Tier 2 $722 $744 (d) Tier 3 $1,083 $1,11117 (f) Tier 4 $1,443 $1,488 (e) Tier s $1,804 $1,860 (2) Inspection/Issuance Fee: (a) Tier 0(no permit required) N/A N/A (b) Tier 1 $516 $532 (c) Tier 2 $1,031 $1,063 (d) Tier 3 $1,371 $1,414 (f) Tier 4 $2,742 $2,827 (e) Tier 5 $4,114 $4,242242 (3) Solid Waste Fills Review Fee': 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee (4) Annual Licenses of Solid Waste Fills Review Fee''': 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee (ii) Civil construction plan review and inspection fees6'''8: (1) $150,000.00 or less 6%of cost 6%of cost (2) Over$150,000.00 but less than$350,000.00 (3) $350,000.00 and over $9,000+5%over$150,000 $9,000+5%over$150,000 $17,500+4%over$350,000 $17,500+4%over$350,000 (iii) Site Plan/Zoning Review and Inspection Fee"' 0.5%of cost 0.5%of cost (iv) Plan Revision following Permit Issuance: (1) Minor(Results in a change 10%or less than the cost of improvements'.Excludes minor adjustments that are $289 $298 approved by the City to be shown on record drawings.) (2) Major(Results in a change of greater than ICY.of the cost of improvements'.) $1,753 $1,807 (v) Wet weather(annual fee) $3,093 $3,189 'The fee for a grading license authorizing additional work to that under a valid license shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original license and the fee shown for the entire project. 'Any unused fee may be carried forward to the next year.If any work is done before the license is issued,the grading license fee shall be doubled. 'All developers,municipal or quasi-municipal entities,or utility corporations or companies,except those specifically exempted,shall pay fees under this Section.Exempted entities include City- franchised cable TV,able modem,natural gas,telecommunications,and electrical power. 6 Includes three(3)review cycles.Additional reviews will be charged$1,700 each. 8 If deemed necessary by the City in its sole discretion,the City will contract with one or more consultants to provide plan reviews and/or inspections with the related costs and expenses payable by the applicant. 6 The fee shall be based up percentage of the estimated cost of improvements. r Cost of improvements shall be based on the City's bond quantity worksheet and shall include all project related improvements outside of the building envelopes,including,but not limited to,all costs required to construct the following:paved parking lots,private sidewalks or walkways;private and public storm water management facilities;temporary erosion and sedimentation control facilities; water quality facilities;public and private streets;public and private sanitary sewers;public water main improvements;required off-site street,bike and pedestrian improvements;street lighting improvements,required landscaping and street tree improvements;and site grading and mobilization costs.The applicant may elect to submit a separate,itemized cost estimates for each item of improvement subject to the approval by the City. 8 Fifty Percent(50%)of the fee is due at Civil Construction Permit Application and the remaining shall be due prior to permit issuance. 'This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects.Project shall pay for site inspection services at actual cost. b• Latecomers Agreement Application Fees": (i) Processing fee'(Nonrefundable) (1) $50,000 or less $1,155 $1,191 (2) Over$50,000 but less than$200,000 $2,320 $2,392 (3) $200,000 and over $4,640 $4,784 (ii) Multi-family:2 units,Duplexes,&Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)' (1) $50,000 or less 15%of total 15%of total (2) Over$50,000 but less than$200,000 10%of total 10%of total (3) $200,000 and over 5%of total 5%of total (iii) Segregation processing fee,if applicable $966 $893 'Fees are based on the amount covered by the Latecomers'. 'The administration and collection fee is deducted from each individual latecomer fee payment and the balance forwarded to the holder of the latecomer's agreement pursuant to RMC 9-5,Tender of Fee. 'This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. C. Utility System Development Charges(SDC): (i) Water and Wastewater System Development Charges(SOC): (1) 5/8 x 3/4 inch and 1 inch: (a) Water service fee' $5,025 $5,025 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $671 (c) Wastewater fee' $4,025 $4,02025 (2) 1-1/2 inch: (a) Water service fee' $25,125 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $25 5 355 (c) Wastewater fee' $ $3, (3) 2inch: $20,,12 125 $20,125 (a) Water service fee' $40,200 $40,200 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $5,368 $5,368 (c) Wastewaterfee' $32,200 $32,200 10 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTIONDEVELOPMENT FEES(CONTINUED) 2025 2026 3. Site Work,Utilities,and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) C. Utility System Development Charges(SDC): (Continued) (4) 3 inch: (a) Water service fee3 $80,400 $80,400 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $10,736 $10,736 (c) Wastewaterfee3 $64,400 $64,400 (5) 4 inch: (a) Water service fee3 $125,625 $125,625 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $16,776 $16,776 (c) Wastewaterfee3 $100,625 $100,625 (6) 6 inch: (a) Water service fee3 $251,250 $251,250 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $33,SS1 $33,551 (c) Wastewaterfee3 $201,250 $201,250 (7) 8 inch: (a) Water service fee3 $402,000 $402,000 (b) Fire sprinkler service fee''' $53,682 $53,682 (c) Wastewater fee3 $322,000 $322,000 (u) Storm Water System Development Charges(SDC): (1) New single family residence(including mobile/manufactured homes)&Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) $2,350 $2,350 (2) Addition to existing single family residence greater than 500 square feet(including mobile/manufactured homes)Fee $0.940 per sq foot $0.940 per sq foot not to exceed$2,350 (3) All other uses charge per square foot of new impervious surface,but not less than$2,350 $0.940 per sq foot $0.940 per sq foot (iii) Utility SDC Segregation Request` $840+administrative costs $840+administrative costs (iv) Temporary Utility Connections: (1) Storm Water Fee;Fee equal to thirty percent(30%)of the current SOC applicable to that portion of the property. 30%of SDC 30%of SDC (2) Wastewater Fee;Annual fee equal to thirty percent(30%)of the current SDC applicable to the size of the temporary 30%of SDC 301A of SDC domestic water meter(s). (3) Water Fee;Annual fee equal to thirty percent(30%)of the current SDC applicable to the size of the temporary water 30%of SDC 30%of SDC meter(s). 'Based upon the size of the fire sprinkler service(NOT detector bypass meter) 'Unless a separate fire sprinkler service is provided,the system development charge(s)shall be based upon the size of the meter installed and a separate Fire sprinkler service fee will not be charged. 3 Any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge is eligible for credit of the existing connection. Fee(s)based upon meter(s)proposed for final project will be reduced by the feels)based upon meter existing on site. `The applicant shall pay the City's administrative costs for the preparation,processing and recording of the partial payment of the feels).If the same segregation is used for more than one utility's special assessment district,and/or latecomer's charge,then only one administrative fee is collected. s Temporary connection may be granted for a one-time,temporary,short-term use of a portion of the property for a period not to exceed three(3)consecutive years. Fee shall be paid annually(non- prorated),and shall be nonrefundable,nontransferable(from one portion of the property to another)and shall not constitute a credit to the system development charge due at the time of permanent use of the utility system.The application for temporary connection shall consist of a detailed plan and a boundary line of the proposed development service area for use in the fee determination. d. Utility Construction Permit Fees: (i) Water Construction Permit Fees: (1) Water Testing,Construction,and Administration Fees: (a) Water meter tests for 3/4"to 2"meter $50 $50 (b) Water meter tests on meters 2"or larger $60 deposit+ $60 deposit+ time and materials time and materials (c) Open and close fire hydrants for fire flow tests conducted by others. Time and materials Time and materials (d) Water service disconnection(cut at main) $275 $275 (e) Meter resets $95 $95 (f) Repair of damage to service $250 $250 (g) Water main connections $560 $560 (h) Water main cut and cap $1,025 $1,025 (i) Water quality/inspection/purity tests $80 $80 0) Specialty water tests(lead,copper,etc) Cost of test+ Cost of test+ $70 processing fee $70 processing fee (k) Water turn ons/offs after hours $185 $185 (1) Installation of isolation valve. $2,000 deposit+ $2,000 deposit+ time and materials time and materials (m) New water line chlorination fee.Fee plus$0.15 per lineal foot for any footage after the first two hundred fifty $250+$0.15 per lineal foot $250+$0.15 per lineal foot (250)lineal feet (n) Miscellaneous water installation fees. Time and materials Time and materials (o) Service size reductions $50 $50 (p) Installation fees for ring and cover castings $200 $200 (2) Water meter installation fees-City installed: (a) 3/4"meter installed by City within City limits.; (i) Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $2,875 $2,875 (ii) Drop in meter only $400 $400 (b) 3/4"meter installed by City outside Citv limits' (i) Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $2,935 $2,935 (ii) Drop in meter only $400 $400 (c) 1"meter installed by the City! (i) Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $2,875 $2,875 (ii) Drop in meter only $460 $460 (d) 1-1/2"meter installed by the City. (i) Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $4,605 $4,605 (ii) Drop in meter only $750 $750 11 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTIONDEVELOPMENT FEES ICONTINUED) r 2026 3. Site Work,Utilities,and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) d. Utility Construction Permit Fees: (Continued) (e) 2"meter installed by the City. (i) Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $4,735 $4,735 (ii) Drop in meter only $950 $950 (3) Water meter processing fees—Applicant installed:For meters larger than 2",the applicant must provide materials $220 $220 and install the meter. (4) Hydrant Meter fees: (a) Hydrant meter permit fee $50 $SO (b) Deposits: (i) 3/4"meter and backflow prevention assembly. $500 $500 (ii) 3"meter and backflow prevention assembly. $2,000 $2,000 (iii) Deposit processing charge,nonrefundable. $25 $25 (c) Meter rental(begins on day of pickup): (i) 3/4"meter and backflow,prevention assembly.Per month. $50 $50 (ii) 3"meter and backflow,prevention assembly.Per month. $250 $250 (ii) Wastewater and Surface Water Construction Permit Fees': (1) Residential: (a) Wastewater permit fee $376 $375 (b) Surface water permit fee $375 $375 (2) Commercial: (a) Wastewater permit fee $375 $375 (b) Surface water permit fee $375 $375 (3) Industrial: (a) Wastewater permit fee $375 $375 (b) Surface water permit fee $375 $375 (4) Repair or modification of any of the above (a) Wastewater permit fee $375 $375 (b) Surface water permit fee $375 $375 (5) Cut and Cap/Demolition Permit: (a) Wastewater permit fee $375 $375 (b) Surface water permit fee $375 $375 (6) Reinspection for Wastewater or Surface Water Permits $375 $375 Ground water discharge(temporary connection to wastewater system for discharge of contaminated ground water $375 $375 (7) over 50,000 gallons)Rate plus billed for current Renton and King County sewer rate on discharged amount(meter plus King County sewer rate on plus King County sewer rate on provided by property owner) discharged amount discharged amount (iv) Street light system fee,per new connection to power system $525 $525 (v) Utility Locate Refresh Fee(Fee is due each time excavator calls in for locate refresh during 45-day locate ticket) (1) Standard locate $500 $500 (2) Large project locate $1,000 $1,000 4 e. Right of Way(ROW)Use Permits Fees' (i) Franchise Permit Fees: (1) Master Service Agreement Application Fee' $175 hr (2) Franchise Permit Fees:°'" / $175/hr (a) Small work,including trenching less than 60 linear feet or installation of 6 or less utility poles $690 $710 (b) All other work,permit fee plus staff time per hours $690+Time and Materials $710+Time and Materials (c) Other public agencies constructing utilities within City right-of-way $690 $710 (3) Small Cell Master Lease Agreement including Site License Addendum and Small Cell Permits (a) Master Lease Agreement Administrative Costs,Staff time per hour and/or cost of materials." Time and Materials Time and Materials (b) Pole Reservation,per pale $140 $140 (c) Administrative Fee,Base plus time and/or cost of materials." $880+Time and Materials $910+Time and Materials Public Reimbursement(any costs incurred by the City on behalf of the permit applicant for installation or (d) operation of site equipment) (i) Electrical service(annual fee) (1) Tier 1,Daily peak kWh<20 $715.38 $715,38 (2) Tier 2,Daily peak kWh 21-40 $1,430+76 $1,430.76 (3) Tier 3,Daily peak kWh 41-60 $2,146.14 $2,146.14 (4) Tier 4,Daily peak kWh 61-80 $2,861.51 $2,861.51 (5) Tier 5,Daily peak kWh>81 $3,576.89 $3,576.89 (ii) All other reimbursement Actual cost Actual cost (e) Site License Addendum Rent $270 $270 (f) All other fees" Actual cost Actual cost (4) Conduit Lease Rates per Lineal Foot(annual fee): (a) Tier 1,conduit in existing planter strips $10.00 $10.00 (b) Tier 2,conduit outside of planter strips excluding signalized intersection crossings,bridges and train tracks $20.00 $20.00 (c) Tier 3,conduit within signalized intersection crossings,bridges and train tracks $30.00 $30.00 (ii) Short-Term ROW Permit Fees(duration 30 days or less)''': (1) Single family residence,one unit only $380 $390 (2) All other uses,excluding those listed" $720 $740 (3) Wastewater or storm water service $375 $375 12 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTIONDEVELOPMENT FEES(CONTINUEDI202S 2026 3. Site Work,Utilities,and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) e. Right of Way Use Permits Fees'(Continued) (iii) Long Term ROW Permit Fees(duration over 30 days)"": (1) Duration greater than thirty(30)days but no more than one(1)year: (a) Within City Limits";Short-Term ROW Permit Fee associated with use plus leasehold excise tax(LET)' Short-Term ROW Short-Term ROW Permit Fee+LET' Permit Fee+LET' (b) King County ROW Permits/Inspections: (i) Service Installation Only $1,025 $1,025 (ij) Utility Extension per 100'of Length(Min 200'Length) $1,025 $1,025 (2) Duration greater than one(1)year8"o: (i) Single family and two family uses" $50+LET' $50+LET' (ii) All uses without public benefit;fee is a per month charge assessed annually based on property value"of 0.5%x Value"+LET' 0.5%x Value"+LET' land to be utilized,plus leasehold excise tax',if applicable. All other uses;fee is a per year charge of assessed value of land adjoining the property",plus leasehold 0.5%x Value"+LET' 0.5%x Value"+LET' excise tax',if applicable.In no case less than$50.00. (iv) Oversize Load Permits $10 $10 'Bond required pursuant to RMC 9-10-5. 'Work and/or use of the right of way,including those associated with a Civil Construction Permit and excludes utilities from other public agencies and service providers which shall be considered under a franchise permit. 'The fixed application fee established herein is intended to cover the City's internal administrative costs in processing and administering the franchise. In addition to the fixed application fee,the City may require applicants to either directly pay or reimburse the City for external costs reasonably incurred to process the application and/or administer the franchise agreement. The City may require applicants to deposit funds in advance to cover legal and/or other professional services fees as they are incurred. °The City may decide to contract with a consultant to perform plan reviews and inspections and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. s If a franchise agreement does not specify the fee amount,the generic fee,as identified in this fee schedule,shall be collected. s Regular hours and standard after hour and overtime fees apply. 'A no fee permit may be issued for the following:individual homeowners performing work in street ROW for street tree or parking strip irrigation systems;residential moving pods or moving trucks provided that they are in the ROW for no more than three(3)days;use in CD zone provided ground disturbing activity is not proposed;and work associated with City of Renton capital improvement projects or City funded projects. "A no fee permit may be issued for the following:A public agency and when the proposed use of the right-of-way provides a direct service to the public(e.g.,Metro applications for right-of-way for bus shelters);and work associated with City of Renton capital improvement projects or City funded projects. 'Leasehold excise tax(LET)imposed pursuant to Chapter 82.29A RCW on leasehold interests for the use of real or personal public property shall be collected from the permittee at a rate established by the State of Washington. 10 Insurance Required:Public Liability and property damage insurance is also required pursuant to RMC 9-2-SB,Minimum Permit Requirements for Excess Right-of-Way Use. "Except those single family and two family uses that utilize right of way along a waterfront. "Right-of-way value shall be based on the assessed value of the land adjoining the property as established by the King County Assessor. "This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. f. Release of easement fees:The imposition,collection,payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-1 RMC,Easements.' (i) Filing fee $290 $300 (i1) Processing fee $290 $300 'This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. g. Street and Alley vacation Fees:The imposition,collection,payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-14 RMC,Vacations.' (i) Filing fee $580 $600 (ii) Processing and completion fee,payable upon Council approval of the vacation and upon administrative determination of appraised value of vacated right-of-way. Appraised Value of Vacated right-of-way: (1) Less than$25,000 $870 $900 (2) $25,000 to$75,000 $1,450 $1,490 (3) Over$75,000 $2,320 $2,390 'This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. , h. Miscellaneous Fees': (i) Street Frontage Improvements Fee-In-Ueu:' (1) All eligible uses except Single Family Additions less than 1,160 sq ft: (a) Street with existing storm drainage main line $134 LF/ $138/LF (b) Street with existing conveyance ditch $159/LF $164/LF (2) Single Family Additions less than 1,160 Sq Ft: Proportional share of the fee in lieu of all eligible uses fee based on (Sq Ft of addition/1,160 sq ft) (Sq Ft of addition/1,160 sq ft) square footage of addition. of Fee-in-lieu of Fee-in-lieu (ii) Re-inspection Fee $163 $168 Inspection for Unscheduled Work' $163 $168 (iv) Regular Staff Review and Inspection Hours' $158/hr $158/hr (v) After hours inspection' $175/hr $175/hr (vi) Permit review staff overtime $175/hr $175/hr (vii) Public Works Reimbursements Actual cost Actual cost (viii) Standard or minor drainage adjustment review $691 $712 ' Unscheduled work includes,but is not limited to,site work that is found to be occurring,or did occur,for which an inspection was not scheduled.Fee is subject to be applied for each occurrence but does not replace a stop work order or other code violation as determined applicable by the City.The fee is in addition to any other applicable inspection fees.The fee may provide day of inspection at the discretion and availability of the City inspector. Applies only to those fees that are noted as time and materials and performed during city staff regular work schedule. 'Applies to inspections performed on Saturdays.Sundays,observed City of Renton holidays,and non-holiday Mondav-Fridays outside the hours of 7:OOam to 3:30pm. °Applies only if permit review is requested by the applicant to be performed on Saturdays,Sundays,observed City of Renton holidays,and non-holiday Monday-Fridays outside of the hours of city staff regular work schedule s Any work performed by City forces or under City contract on behalf of a permit applicant to repair damage to the City infrastructure or caused by the permit applicant or contractor under its control, or any and all roadway or right-of-way cleanup efforts performed by City forces or under City contract that resulted from the work performed by the permit applicant or contractors under its control. This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects.Project shall pay for site inspection services at actual cost 13 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION •• • •) 2025 2026 4. Technology Surcharge Fee An additional technology surcharge shall be required for all fees included in She following Subsections of Section XII,Development Fees,of 5.0% 5.0% the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure:Subsection 1,Building Fees;Subsection a,except for appeals,critical areas review fee,and direct EIS costs,of subsection 2,Land Use Review Fees;Subsections a,b,c(iii),d,and e,except Master Franchise/Small Cell Permit Application Fee and Long Term ROW Permit Fees(duration over one year),of subsection 3,Site Work,Utilities,and Right of Way Fees;and Section XIII,Fire Department Fire Marshall Fees 5._ Impact Fees: a. School Impact Fees: (i) Issaquah School District (1) Single Family Fee,per dwelling $4 728 $4 728 (2) Multi Family,Duplex,&Accessory Dwelling Fee(ADU),per dwelling $0.00 $0.00 (n) Kent School District (1) Single Family Fee,per dwelling $0.00 $0.00 (2) Multi Family,Duplex,&Accessory Dwelling Fee(ADU),per dwelling $0.00 $0.00 (iii) Renton School District (1) Single Family Fee,per dwelling $1,003 $1,003 (2) Multi Family.Duplex.&Accessory Dwelling Fee IADU14.per dwelling $3,268 $3,268 (iv) School Impact Fee Administration 5%x School Impact Fee 5%x School Impact Fee b. Transportation Impact Fees''a'a: ITE Land Use Codes (i) Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU),per dwelling ITE LUC 220 $6,184,59 $6,194.59 (ii) Church,per sq foot ITE LUC 560 $4.79 $4.79 (iii) Coffee/Donut Shop,no drive up,per sq foot ITE LUC 936 $175.21 $175.21 (iv) Coffee/Donut Shop,with drive up,per sq foot ITE LUC 937 $211.59 $211.59 M Convenience market-24 hour,per sq foot ITE LUC 851 $207.87 $207.87 (vi) Daycare,per sq foot ITE LUC 565 $19.81 $19.81 (vii) Drinking Place,per sq foot ITE LUC 975 $14.58 $14.58 (viii) Drive-in bank,per sq foot ITE LUC 912 $120.84 $120.84 (ix) Fast Casual Dining with 30 seat max,incl.only walk-up window,per sq foot ITE LUC 930 $68.10 $68.10 (x) Fast food,no drive-up,per sq foot ITE LUC 933 $180.23 $180.23 (xi) Fast food,with drive-up,per sq foot ITE LUC 934 5182.87 $182.87 (xii) Gas station with convenience store,per pump ITE LUC 945 $89,966.30 $89,966.30 (xiii) Gas station,per pump ITE LUC 944 $87,S36.72 $87,536.72 (xiv) General Light Industrial,per sq foot ITE LUC 110 $6.36 $6.36 (xv) General office,per sq foot ITE LUC 710 $14.07 $14.07 (xvi) Health/fitness club,per sq foot ITE LUC 492 $35.23 $35.23 (xvii) High-Cube Warehouse:Cold Storage,per so foot' ITE LUC 1S7 $2.57 $2.57 (xiii) High-Cube Warehouse:Fulfillment Center INS),per so foot' ITE LUC 155 $2.33 $2.33 (xix) High-Cube Warehouse:Parcel Hub,per so foot' ITE LUC 156 $10.12 $10.12 (xx) High-Cube Warehouse:Transload/Short-Term,per sci foot' ITE LUC 154 $1.61 $1.61 (xxi) Hospital,per sq foot ITE LUC 610 $7.22 $7.22 (xxii) Hotel,per room ITE LUC 310 $4,216.05 $4,216.05 (xxiii) Industrial Park,per so foot' ITE LUC 130 $5.62 $5.62 (xxiv) Manufacturing,per so foot' ITE LUC 140 $10.36 $10.36 (xxv) Marina,per boat berth ITE LUC 420 $2,286.67 $2,286.67 (xxvi) Medical office,per sq foot ITE LUC 720 $36.23 $36.23 (xxvii) Mobile home,per dwelling ITE LUC 240 $7,068.11 $7,068.11 (xxxiii) Motel,per room ITE LUC 320 $3,001.25 $3,001.25 (xxix) Movie theater,per seat ITE LUC 44S $786.04 $786.04 (xxx) Multifamily Housing,per dwelling ITE LUC 220 $6,184.59 $6,184.59 (xxxi) Nursing home,per bed ITE LUC 620 $1,285.11 $1,285.11 (xxvii) Restaurant:sit-down,per sq foot ITE LUC 932 $56.02 $56.02 (xxxiii) Self-service Storage,per sq foot ITE LUC 151 $1.50 $1.50 (xxxiv) Senior housing-detached,per dwelling ITE LUC 2S1 $3,694.69 $3,694.69 (xxxv) Shopping center,per sq foot ITE LUC 820 $24.37 $24.37 (xxxvi) Single family house,per dwelling ITE LUC 210 $11,485.67 $11,485,67 (xxxvii) Supermarket,per sq foot ITE LUC 850 $63.17 $63.17 (xxxiii) Townhouses,per dwelling ITE LUC 215 $6,987.79 $6,987.79 (xxxix) Warehouse.per so foot' ITE LUC 150 $3,29 $3.29 (xxxx) Net New PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip(Proposed-Existing),per PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip $8,031,94 $8,031.94 'ITE LUC:Institutue of Transportation Engineers Land Use Codes defined in the 11th Edition ITE Trip Generation Handbook 'Impact fees include a Passenger Car-Equivalent(PCE)factor. 'Applied fee reductions based on uses by percentage of Net New PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip:Early Learning Facilities(i.e.Daycare)is 20%and Commercial/Retail/Industrial is 88.97%except uses with PCE factors which will remain at 1001%. 'All uses within the Center Downtown(CD)Zone shall be reduced to 20%of the assessed transportation impact fee. c. Park Impact Fees: (i) Single family $3,276.44 $3,276.44 (ii) Multi-family:2 units.Duplexes,&Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU)} $2,6S9.70 $2,659.70 (iii) Multi-family:3 or 4 units $2,S31.21 $2,531.21 (iv) Multi-family:5 or more units $2,222.84 $2,222.84 (v) Mobile home $2,325.63 $2,325.63 I d. Fire Impact Fees: (i) Residential-single family(detached dwellings&duplexes),per dwelling unit $421.98 $421.98 (II) Residential-multi family&Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADUI'.per dwelling unit $579.41 $579.41 (iii) Hotel/motel/resort,per room $346.22 $346.22 (iv) Medical care facility,per bed $1,052.00 $1,052.00 (v) Office,per sq foot $0.14 $0,14 14 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTIONDEVELOPMENT • r) 2025t 26 S. Impact Fees:(Continued) (vi) Medical/dental office,per sq foot $0,61 $0.61 (vii) Retail,per sq foot $0.66 $0.66 (viii) Leisure facilities,per sq foot $0.42 $0.42 (ix) Restaurant/lounge,per sq foot $1.44 $1.44 (x) Industrial/manufacturing,per sq foot $0.05 $0.05 (xi) Church,per sq foot $0.24 $0.24 (xii) Education,per student $28.02 $28.02 (xiii) Special public facilities,per sq foot $0.13 $0.13 a e• Independent Fee Calculation Review(or unless otherwise established by School District or Renton Regional Fire Authority)' $560 $560 `This fee shall be$0 for City of Renton Capital Improvement Projects or city funded projects. f. Impact Fee Deferral Administration: (i) Each Lot,Single Family Dwelling,or Condominium $100 $100 (h) Each Multi-family Building $100 $100 6. Miscellaneous Fees a. Multifamily Tax Exemption Application $1,000.00 $1,000.00 b. Tree Fee in lieu,credit replacement,and/or credit supplement (i) Per diameter inch measured at 4.5 feet above grade $225.00 $225.00 (ii) Labor cost for each 2"caliper(or 6ft tall)tree to be planted $500.00 $500.00 C. Affordable Housing Cash Payment in Lieu`'`'s: (i) Zip Code 98055 (1) Studio $235,836.73 $235,836.73 (2) 1-Bedroom $227,510.20 $227,510.20 (3) 2-Bedroom $253,469.39 $253,469.39 (4) 3-Bedroom $406,775.51 $406,775.51 (5) 4-Bedroom $495,673.47 $495,673.47 (ii) Zip Code 98056 (1) Studio $167,265.31 $167,265.31 (2) 1-Bedroom $156,489.80 $156,489.80 (3) 2-Bedroom $170,204.08 $170,204.08 (4) 3-Bedroom $296,571.43 $296,571.43 (5) 4-Bedroom $368,326.53 $368,326.53 (iii) Zip Code 98057 (1) Studio $135,428.57 $135,428.57 (2) 1-Bedroom $124,653.06 $124,653.06 (3) 2-Bedroom $133,469.39 $133,469.39 (4) 3-Bedroom $247,591.84 $247,591.94 (5) 4-Bedroom $314,448.98 $314,448.98 (iv) Zip Code 98058 (1) Studio $201,551.02 $201,551.02 (2) 1-Bedroom $193,224.49 $193,224.49 (3) 2-Bedroom $211,836.73 $211,836.73 (4) 3-Bedroom $352,897.96 $352,897.96 (5) 4-Bedroom $432,000.00 $432,000.00 (iv) Zip Code 98059 (1) Studio $270,122.45 $270,122.45 (2) 1-Bedroom $261,795.92 $261,795.92 (3) 2-Bedroom $292,653.06 $292,653.06 (4) 3-Bedroom $458,204.08 $458,204.08 (5) 4-Bedroom $556,897.96 $556,897.96 `The ash payment in lieu is calculated by multiplying the fee shown in the table by the number of affordable housing units requested for cash payment in lieu of on-site development. 'The ash payment in lieu shall be based on the zipcode of the project site.If the project site is located in a zipcode not listed in the table above,the closest abutting zipcode shall be utilized to determine payment calculation. 3 The bedroom count utilized to calculate the ash payment in lieu shall be based on the bedroom count majority developed on- site.If the bedroom counts developed on-site are equally divided(e.g.So%1 bedrooms and 50%2 bedrooms),the higher bedroom count shall be utilized for calculation.The bedroom number selection for payment calculation shall also comply with RMC 4.4. ISS.D,Number of Bedrooms. SECTIONsEPARIMENT FIRE MARSHAL FEES(RFA) 202S 2026 a. Fire plan review and inspection fees: (1) $0 to$249.99 $50 $50 111) $250.00 to$999.99 $50+2%of the cost $50+2%of the cost (iii) $1,000.00 to$4,999.99 $75+2%of the cost $75+2%of the cost (iv) $5,000.00 to$49,999,99 $200+1.5%of the cost $200+1.5%of the cost (v) $50,000.00 to$99,999.99 $450+1.2%of the cost $4S0+1.2%of the cost (vi) $100,000.00 and above $950+.75%of the cost $950+.75%of the cost (vii) Construction Re-inspection.Fee is per hour with a 2 hour minimum.The minimum may be assessed if the requested $175 $175 inspection does not meet the approval of the inspector. (viii) Violation/Second Re-Inspection after 30-day period(whenever 30 days or more have passed since Fire Department $150 $150 notification of a violation,which required a first re-inspection,and such violation has not been remedied or granted an extension) (ix) Third and subsequent re-Inspection/Pre-Citation Follow-Up Inspection when re-inspections are required beyond the first $250 $250 and second re-inspections (x) Preventable Fire alarm fee: (1) First,second,and third preventable alarms N/C N/C (2) Fourth and fifth preventable alarms in a calendar year,fee is per each alarm. $75 $75 (3) Sixth preventable alarm and successive preventable alarms in a calendar year,fee is per each alarm. $150 $150 (xi) Late Payment Penalty $35 $35 b. Fire Permit type: (i) Operational fire code permit(issued in accordance with Section 105.6 of the IFC)fee is yearly(includes items such as fire $150 $150 special events,covered stages,mobile food facilities,hot works,etc.) (ii) Permits for Mobile food facilities that have passed a fire and life safety inspection in another jurisdiction that has reciprocity $75 $75 with Renton RFA (iii) Hazardous materials and HPM facilities yearly $250 $250 (iv) Construction permit: 20%of plan review fee- 20%of plan review fee- Min.$75 Min.$75 15 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 (v) Hazardous production materials permit(for businesses storing,handling,or using hazardous production materials as $250 $250 regulated in the fire code)permit is yearly (vi) Underground tank removal permit(commercial) See Fire plan review and See Fire plan review and construction permit fees construction permit fees (vii) Underground tank removal or abandonment-in-place permit(residential) $200 $200 (viii) Other requested inspection when not required by the fire code,or when requested for after hours inspections.Fee is per $175 $175 hour with a minimum 2 hours when approved by the Fire Marshal,such as home daycares. (ix) (Vill)Non-emergency Billable Services(ie:boat assists,etc)Rates published at: WFC Current Wage and WFC Current Wage and www.washingtonfirechiefs.com Equipment Rate Equipment Rate M NSF check fees $25 $25 (xi) RFA technology surcharge fee applied to Fire Department Fire Marshal Fees,subsection a.(i,ii,iii,iv,v,vi)and subsection b. S% 5% (iii) 16 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2025-2026 SECTION •NETARY PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR INFRAcnONS ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITYOF 1 1 26 CHAPTER :1 RCW 1. Effect of Schedule.This schedule establishes default base penalties for violations of the Renton Municipal Code that are issued as infractions under the authority of RCW 7.80 RCW,but these penalties do not include any state-imposed statutory assessments.Except as otherwise prohibited by law or court rule,a court with jurisdiction over the infraction may impose on a defendant a lesser penalty in an individual case.Provided that,whenever the base penalty plus mandatory statutory assessments results in a total payment that is not an even dollar amount,the base penalty is deemed to be amended to a higher amount which produces the next greatest even dollar total 2. Penalties Established by Court Rule or Specific Penalty Established by Law.This schedule does not apply to penalties established by state or local court rule or to a penalty that is established in law with a specific amount(i.e.ordinance or statute setting a penalty equal to a specified amount rather than a penalty up to a maximum amount).To the extent a penalty scheduled herein conflicts with a state or local court rule or a penalty that is established in law,this schedule shall be deemed preempted by the court rule or penalty established in law. 3. Penalties: The following violations shall carry the following listed default base penalty,not including statutory assessments: a. Violation of Park Rules(Civil Infraction) RMC 2-9-8.0 $73 $73 I. Activities Prohibited in a Park RMC 2-9-8.C.1 $73 $73 ii. Disregard Park Trail Sign RMC 2-9-8.C.2 $73 $73 iii. Unauthorized Vehicle in a Park RMC 2-9-8.C.3 $73 $73 iv. Operating Motorized Vehicle on Park Trail RMC 2-9-8.C.4 $73 $73 V. Dismount Zone Violation RMC 2-9-8.C.5 $73 $73 vi. Speeding on Trails RMC 2-9-8.C.6 $73 $73 vii. Vehicle/Boat Repair in Park RMC 2-9-8.C.7 $73 $73 viii. Racing in Park RMC 2-9-8.C.8 $73 $73 ix. SCUBA Diving in Park RMC 2-9-8.C.9 $73 $73 X. Camping/Overnight Stay in Parks RMC 2-9-8.C.10 $73 $73 A. Fire/Barbeque in Park RMC 2-9-8.C.11 $73 $73 xii. Metal Detecting RMC 2-9-8.C.12 $73 $73 xiii. Glass Container in Park with Swimming Area RMC 2-9-S.C.13 $73 $73 xiv. Group Rally/Special Use Permit RMC 2-9-8.C.14 $73 $73 xv. Parking&Mooring Violation RMC 2-9-8.C.15 $73 $73 xvi. City Events Violation RMC 2-9-8.C.16 $73 $73 xvii. Alcohol in Park RMC 2-9-S.C.17 $73 $73 xviii. Smoking in Park RMC 2-9-S.C.17 $73 $73 b. Possession/Sale/Discharge of Fireworks RMC 4-5-070.C.102 $49 $49 C. Animal Control—No License RMC 5-4-1 $49 $49 d. Littering RMC 6-14-22 $50 $50 I. Litter in Public Spaces RMC 6-14-3 $50 $50 ii. Placement of Litter in Receptacles RMC 6-14-4 $50 $50 iii. Sweeping Litter in Gutters RMC 6-14-5 $50 $50 iv. Merchants'Duty RMC 6-14-6 $50 $50 V. Litter Thrown By Persons in Vehicles RMC 6-14-7 $50 $50 vi. Truck Loads Causing Litter RMC 6-14-8 $50 $50 vii. Litter in Lakes and Fountains RMC 6-14-10 $50 $50 viii. Throwing/Distributing Commercial Handbills in RMC 6-14-11 Public Places $50 $50 ix. Placing Handbills on Vehicles RMC 6-14-12 $50 $50 X. Depositing Handbills on Uninhabited/Vacant RMC 6-14-13 Premises $50 $50 A. Prohibiting Distribution of Handbills Where Properly RMC 6-14-14 Posted $50 $50 xii. Distributing Handbills at Inhabited Private Premises RMC 6-14-15 $So $50 xiii. Dropping Litter from Aircraft RMC 6-14-16 $50 $so xiv. Posting Notices Prohibited RMC 6-14-17 $50 $50 xv. Litter on Occupied Private Property RMC 6-14-18 $50 $50 xvi. Owner to Maintain Premises Free of Litter RMC 6-14-19 $50 $50 xvii. Litter of Vacant Lots RMC 6-14-20 $50 $50 e. Animal Control—Animal at Large RMC 1 $49 $49 f. Animal Control—Animal/Fowl Habitual Noise RMC 6-6-S.A $49 $49 g. Encroachment on Public Property RMC 9-17-10 $100 $100 h. Negligent Operation of Watercraft RMC 9-3-5 $42 $42 I. Speed Regulations of Watercraft RMC 9-3-7 $42 $42 J. Obstructions of Waterways RMC 9-3-10 $122 $122 k. Equipment Numbering Violation RMC 9-3-26 $42 $42 1. Violation of Rules of the Road RMC 9-3-31 $42 $42 m. Inattentive Driving RMC 10-12-25 $67 $67 n. Truck Route Violation RMC 10-12-26 $42 $42 o. Avoiding Intersection RMC 10-12-27 $42 $42 p. Unsafe Use of Scooter RMC 10-12-28.0 $42 $42 q. Use of Scooter Where Prohibited RMC 10-12-28.D $42 $42 r. Use of Scooter Without a Helmet RMC 10-12-28.E.1 $42 $42 S. No Reflectors on Scooter RMC 10-12-28.E.2 $42 $42 t. No Muffler on Scooter RMC 10-12-28.F $42 $12 u. Scooter Operator Under Age 13 RMC 10-12-28.G $42 $42 V. Operating Scooter When Prohibited RMC 10-12-28.H $42 $42 w. Violation of ATV Ordinance RMC 10-2-5 $47 $47 All other violations identified by Renton Municipal Code as an infraction not listed or otherwise specified by court rule or law. $48 $48 17 RESOLUTION NO. 4542 EXHIBIT B 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 411 J U N E 13, 2024 B 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Issaquah School District No. 411 Issaquah, Washington Adopted: June 13, 2024 Resolution No: 1221 KC STRC - Rev. 3 F� �l ICj The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. Page 1 of 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLEOF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVESUMMARY..................................................................................................................3 STANDARDOF SERVICE...............................................................................................................4 TRIGGEROF CONSTRUCTION.....................................................................................................5 DEVELOPMENT TRACKING AND STUDENT GENERATION RATES..........................................5 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS.................................6 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (continued)..............7 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY...................................................................................................8 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ................................9 TABLE 2: STUDENT FACTORS —SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY......................................10 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES.....................................................11 SITELOCATION MAP...................................................................................................................12 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP...........................................................................................13 ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN .....................................14 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS............................15 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS.......................................16 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS............................................17 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS.....................................................................................18 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS......................................19 APPENDIX A: 2024-25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES.................................................20 APPENDIX B: 2024-25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES ............................................................21 APPENDIX C: 2024-25 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES ................................................................22 APPENDIX D: 2024-25 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES..............................................................23 APPENDIX E: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN .......................................................................................24 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION RATE MEMO......................................................... 25-26 Page 2 of 26 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the"Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the "District") as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and King County Council Code Title 21A. This Plan was prepared using data available in April 2024. This Plan is an update of prior long-term Capital Facilities Plans adopted by the Issaquah School District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole Plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with board policies, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six- Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first submitted a request to King County to impose and to collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated King County. On November 16, 1992, the King County Council first adopted the District's Plan and a fee implementing ordinance. This Plan is the annual update of the Six-Year Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle and Sammamish collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Most of these jurisdictions provide exemptions from impact fees for senior housing and certain low-income housing. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any charges in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. Page 3 of 26 STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re-locatable classroom facilities (portables). Different class sizes are used depending on the grade level or programs offered such as special education or the gifted program. With the passage of Initiative 728 in November 2000, the Issaquah School Board established new class size standards for elementary grades K-5. The Board and District Administration will continue to keep class sizes near the levels provided by 1-728; this will be done via local levy funds. The District has provided Full-Day Kindergarten since the 2016-2017 school year. A class size average of 20 for grades K-5 is used to calculate building capacities. A class size of 26 is used for grades 6-8 and 28 for grades 9-12. Special Education class size is based on 12 students per class. For the purpose of this analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with the provisions of King County Council Code Title 21A, are not considered classrooms. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Portables used as classrooms accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school as an interim classroom or removed. The District currently has one undeveloped site, planned for a new high school and future elementary school. The State does not provide funding for property purchases. The District's voters approved the 2016 Bond to provide funding for a new high school, new middle school, two new elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. All of those projects are now complete with the exception of the new high school and one new elementary school. The new high school is discussed further in this Capital Facilities Plan and will require additional funding sources. The new elementary school is on indefinite hold until capacity at the elementary level is needed. Additional funding for the new high school is anticipated to be pursued during the six-year planning period. Page 4 of 26 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high school to meet capacity needs at the high school level related to recent and ongoing enrollment growth needs. The District recently completed construction of a new elementary school, Cedar Trails Elementary School, a new middle school, Cougar Mountain Middle School, as well as additions at several elementary schools, all to help address recent growth needs. The need for new schools and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bond issues determine when any new facility can be constructed. New school facilities are a response, in part, to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. DEVELOPMENT TRACKING AND STUDENT GENERATION RATES In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi-family residence. It also provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the number of students who will attend our schools from future developments. The District used a third-party consultant to review recent development data and provide updated student generation rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family residence and new multi-family housing. Updated rates are shown in Table 2. Page 5 of 26 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS The District relies on school impact fee revenue to help fund growth-related capacity needs. However, by law, impact fees can only be used to fund a portion of a capacity project. State funding and impact fees are also not reliable sources of revenue. As a result, the District must also rely on local funding to fund school construction. The District has one growth-related capacity project included in this Capital Facilities Plan which is a new high school. The voters funded the project as a part of the April 2016 bond and the April 2022 capital levy. The District utilized funds from the 2016 Bond to purchase property for the new high school and to engage in design and permitting work. Additional funding, aside from impact fee revenue and State School Construction Assistance Program dollars, is needed to construct the new high school. As demonstrated in Appendix A the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 8,763 students at the elementary level. This leaves the District's elementary enrollment under permanent capacity by 781 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). As demonstrated in Appendix B the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,946 students at the middle school level. This leaves the District's middle school enrollment under permanent capacity by 442 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). As demonstrated in Appendix C the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,921 students at the high school level. This leaves the District's high school enrollment over permanent capacity by 815 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). Based on the District's student generation rates (Table 2), the District expects that 0.641 students will be generated from each new single family home and 0.159 students will be generated from each new multi-family dwelling unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained on page 9 to the District's existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2029-30, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be under its permanent capacity by 760 students, under permanent capacity at the middle school level by 483 students, and over permanent capacity by 673 students at the high school level. Importantly, the above figures incorporate recently completed growth-projects at the elementary and middle school levels. The District's enrollment projections are developed using two methods: first, the cohort survival — historical enrollment method is used to forecast enrollment growth based upon the progression of existing students in the District; then, the enrollment projections are modified to include students anticipated from new developments in the District. Page 6 of 26 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (continued) To address existing and future capacity needs, the District's six-year construction plan includes the following capacity projects: Facility Projected / Final Location Additional Expansions Completion Date Capacity New High School August 2027 Issaquah 1600 The District recently opened the new Cougar Mountain Middle School, with permanent capacity of 828, and the new Cedar Trails Elementary School, with permanent capacity of 496 students. Both schools were funded by the April 2016 bond and provide capacity to serve new growth. Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data, the District has determined that the planned new high school is needed, in part, to provide capacity improvements necessary to serve students generated by recent and ongoing new residential development. The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi-family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by credits for the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted as required by local ordinances. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve each new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. The impact fees will be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050-110 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District's recent and ongoing student growth, coupled with the need for the timely funding and construction of new facilities to serve this growth, requires strict adherence to this position. Page 7 of 26 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Two basic techniques are used, with the results compared, to establish the most likely range of anticipated student enrollment: 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. The cohort method is also hampered by the fact that it does account for anomalies affecting enrollment (for example, the Covid-19 pandemic, temporary remote learning and the variations in the transition back to in-person learning). 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., the District seeks to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year and converts those units to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. (The student generation factors are shown in Table 2) b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After determining the expected new students, the current actual student enrollments are moved forward from year to year with the arrived at additions. One of the challenges associated with all projection techniques is that, where new development is in the pipeline, they tend to always show growth because the number of houses and the general population always increases. Enrollments, however, can and do decrease even as the population increases. The reason is as the population matures, the number of kindergartners will go down as the number of 10th graders is still increasing. To adjust for this factor, the number of school age children per dwelling is examined. When this number exceeds expectations, it is probably because the District is still assuming kindergarten growth, while the main growth is actually moving into middle school. When this happens, a reduction factor is added to kindergarten to force it to decrease even though the general population continues to grow. A precise statistical formula has not been developed to make this adjustment. After all of the projections have been made and examined, the most likely range is selected. An examination of past projections compared with actual enrollment indicates the cohorts tend to be more accurate over a ten-year time span while dwelling units tend to be more accurate over a shorter period. The probable reason is that over a ten-year period, the projections tend to average out even though there are major shifts both up and down within the period. The Covid-19 pandemic has complicated projections in recent years. The District has experienced a return to in-person learning in the last three years but continues to monitor student enrollment closely. As with last year's projections, this year's projections are more conservative than in previous years to allow the District to gather additional data and experience. Like other districts, the District is also experiencing fewer students at the high school level enrolling in Running Start options and instead choosing to be fully enrolled in the District 9-12 program. Enrollment projections for the years 2024-2025 through 2038-2039 are shown in Table 1 (page 9). These projections are conservative in the near-term (within a 5 year period). The District assumes an eventual increase in enrollment will occur, but does not believe our historical peak enrollment will be reached within the next 7 years. The District however, could have a large uptick in enrollment depending upon land use decisions, housing and labor market, etc. The District will monitor these matters and include updated information in future updates to the Capital Facilities Plan. Page 8 of 26 TABLE 1 . ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS: 2014-15 THRU 2023-24 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS: 2024-25 THRU 2038-39 FTE Enrollment Year K 1ST 2N0 3RD 4TH STH 6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH LOTH 11TH 12TH TOTAL K-S 6-8 9-12 Total 2014-15 694 1494 1552 1478 1545 1555 1 1512 1491 1432 1495 1352 1292 1115 18,006 8317 4435 5254 18,006 2015-16 661 1547 1558 1615 1548 1582 1600 1552 1520 1472 1489 1167 1136 28,445 8511 4671 5264 18,445 2016-17 1408 1483 1623 1609 1650 1604 1626 1626 1585 1565 1475 1290 1063 19,606 9376 4837 5393 19,606 2017-18 1447 1561 1535 1691 1641 1680 1627 1655 1651 1629 1546 1243 1165 20,072 9556 4933 5584 20,072 2018-19 1337 1519 1591 1555 1720 1.645 1723 1631 1638 1677 1565 1308 1061 19,971 9367 4992 5612 19,971 2019-20 1453 1467 1593 1654 1603 1743 1680 1731 1648 1651 1626 1263 1134 20,245 9511 5059 5674 20,245 2020-21 1133 1441 1398 1530 1589 1529 1662 161.6 1678 1629 1595 1244 1098 29,142 8620 4956 5566 19,142 2021-22 1171 1237 1401 1389 1494 1518 1527 1602 1583 1654 1577 1305 1164 18,621 8210 4712 5699 18,621 2022-23 1246 1332 1296 1442 1409 1531 1526 1532 1596 1589 1594 1327 1149 18,569 8256 4654 5659 18,569 2023-24 1152 1329 1378 1 1363 1451 1431 1542 1518 1 1551 1631 1588 1334 1191 18,458 8104 1 4610 5744 1 18,458 2024-ZS 1118 1259 1359 1414 1375 1456 1443 1536 1525 1581 1616 1320 1218 18,221 7981 4504 5736 28,221 2025-26 1134 1 1228 1290 1401 1431 1386 1475 1445 15S4 1561 1576 13S9 1216 18,054 7869 4473 5712 18,054 2026.27 1165 1258 1266 1338 1419 1446 1409 1476 2460 1586 1550 1327 1254 17,9S4 7892 4345 5717 17,9S4 2027-28 1189 1294 1311 1325 1366 1451 1475 1422 1501 1503 1584 1309 1217 17,948 7937 4399 5612 17,948 2028-29 1151 1312 1346 1375 1355 1397 1485 1490 1453 1552 1S11 1345 1208 17,979 7936 4428 5615 17,919 2029-30 1149 1281 1366 1410 141.0 1388 1434 1505 1524 1506 1562 1275 1251 18,060 8003 4463 5594 18,060 2030-31 1155 1283 1340 1435 1449 1448 1430 1459 1544 1582 1521 1333 1185 18,165 8110 4433 5622 18,165 2031-32 1162 1295 1347 1414 1479 1493 1496 1459 1503 1607 1602 1298 1246 18,401 8191 4457 5754 18,401 2032-33 1161 1305 1364 1427 1463 1529 1546 1531 1509 1571 1633 1385 1214 18,639 8250 4586 5803 18,639 2033-34 1156 1307 1377 1448 1481 1517 1588 1587 1586 1582 1603 1421 1307 18,9S8 8285 4760 5913 18,958 2034-35 1157 1306 1384 1465 1507 1539 1580 1633 1647 1665 1619 1395 1349 19,244 8357 4860 6027 19,244 2035-36 1158 1311 1387 1476 1529 1571 1607 1631 1699 1732 1707 1417 1327 19,552 8432 4937 6183 19,552 2036-37 1159 1316 1397 1484 1545 1598 1645 1664 1702 1790 1781 1512 1353 19,945 8499 5010 6435 19,945 2037-30 1158 1320 1407 1499 1558 1620 1678 1707 1741 1798 1845 1591 1454 20,375 8561 5125 6688 20,375 2039.39 1157 1323 1415 1513 1577 1638 1704 1745 1790 1843 1859 1662 1539 20,767 8625 5239 6903 20,767 *2016-17 Enrollment reflects the addition of State Funded Full Day Kindergarten Page 9 of 26 TABLE 2: STUDENT FACTORS - SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY--] Housing Unit Type Housing Students Student Generation Rates(SGRs) Units K-5 6 8 9-12 K-12 K-5 6-8 9-12 K-12 Single-family(SFLI) 1-170 400 171 179 750 0342 0,146 0-153 0,641 Multifamily(MFU) 1,223 105 49 40 194 0.086 0.040 0M3 0.159 Notes: Housing units built in 2023 are excluded,because they may not have been completed and occupied by WOW 2023, King County code Title 21A.43 defines the housing types as such,"single family units sbali mean single detach"dwelling units,and mufti-family units shall mean townhouses and apartments." (a)The multifamily category includes all structures with five or more housing units and the following structure types.,townhome, dkiplex,trip?ex and fourplex. Sources: Issaquah School District 2023-24 headcount enrollment. King County parcels and housing inventory. Page 10 of 26 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 18,630 students in permanent facilities and 4,688 students in portables. While portables are critical for interim capacity needs, they are not desirable nor long-term capacity solutions. The District looks to its permanent capacity, as adjusted for utilization, for purposes of determining growth-related needs and addressing school capacity. The projected student enrollment for the 2024-2025 school year is expected to be 18,221 which leaves a permanent capacity surplus of 409. Enrollment projections indicate permanent capacity needs at the high school level over the six-year planning period. Calculations of elementary, middle school and high school capacities are shown in Appendices A, B and C. Totals are shown in Appendix D. Below is a list of current facilities. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 1171h Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. S.E., Sammamish Cedar Trails Elementary 4399 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd S.E. , Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 1671h Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 161h Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 S.E. Issaquah-Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204'h Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 1361h Ave S.E., Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32nd Street, Issaquah Cougar Mountain Middle School 1929 NW Talus Dr, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 600 2nd Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah-Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3095 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd., Sammamish GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Gibson Ek High School 379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 5150 220th Ave S.E., Issaquah Holly Street Early Learning Center 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center- Main 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Center- Satellite 3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Page 11 of 26 SITE LOCATION MAP 8 Skyline High ' CreeAide •Discovery Cascade Ridge 3, Sunny Hills LI Pine lake • 0 er•Challen fI ToSeatde Middle g ■ "Q, Beaverlake Sunset V Middle • ka 13 CedAr,Tralls ,,(,Endeavour W (ES#16) • . •Couga 6 '�e'"n Pacific x; Ridge Admin.Center Cascade Middle v Fx"15 st Si o.,gwtik;unsainWhy a i *Grand Ridge Holly St.CampusVor issaq rah Valle ► 1 90 rtzEQnd Cougar Mountain■ Newcastle Middle(MS#6) Clark Gibsonk ■ Issaquah Middle Transports n •lssaquah High rfi ^4 Echo Glen Children's(enter SO 90D-Anari h,,jqL n Rd May Valley � Service ' 'Center Legend •Elementary School ■Middle/High School Apollo t-� To Renton ► Administration/Support Services Liberty •Briarwood High• Maywood ■ Middle SA r6 �*n VSAyFrwewa Maple Hills 1� � u rr "� 4� Page 12 of 26 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP 7-1 FJ _.w Legend � f; ISD Boundary . . KC Urban Growth Boundary t ' I F Elementary School ® Middle School ■ High School .�•;�.� t Echo Glen � ISD Buildin s 1Ct f k Page 13 of 26 THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. Shown in Table 3 is the District's projected capacity to house students, which reflects the additional facilities as noted. Voters passed a $533 million bond in April 2016 to fund the purchase of land for and construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. The voters also funded an April 2022 capital levy to provide an additional funding for the high school project as well as other projects. On May 23, 2024 the ISD Board of Directors reallocated, via resolution, $44,000,000 in funds from the 2022 capital levy that were designated for the new high school to other more immediate capital needs. The District does anticipate receiving State matching funds for the new high school project that would reduce future bond sale amounts or be applied to new K-12 construction projects included in this Plan. The District will need additional funding to construct the new high school. The District anticipates seeking additional funding within six years, with the Bond Advisory Committee working now on recommendations to the Board of Directors for a future bond proposal. Secured funding will be identified in future updates to this CFP. The District also anticipates that it will receive $500,000 in impact fees and mitigation payments that will be applied to capital projects. Per the formula in the adopted school impact fee ordinance, half of the unfunded growth-related need is assigned to impact fees and half is the local share. Page 14 of 26 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS TABLE 3: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Years 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027.28 2028-29 2029-30 Permanent Capacity-Existing @ 100`36 Utilization Rate 9,224 9,224 9,224 9,224 9,224 9,224 Permanent Capacity-future Added @ 100%Utilization Rate 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gross Totals @ 100%Utilization Rate 9,224 9,224 9,224 9,224 1 9,224 9,224 Subtotal @ 95%Utilization Rate 8,763 8,763 8,763 8,763 8,763 8,763 Portable Classrooms Capacity @ 95%Utilization Rate 2.800 2,800 2,800 2,800 7,SUt"1 2,800 Total Capacity 95%Utilization Rate 11,563 11,563 11,563 11,563 11,563 11,563 Projected FTE Enrollment 7,981 7,869 7,892 7,937 7,936 8,003 Permanent Capacity Surplus/Deficit 782 894 871 826 826 760 1. Permanent Capacity calculations are based on the 95%utilization factors(See Appendix A). 2.The number of portables may be reduced as permanent capacity projects come on line and are open for instruction. Page 15 of 26 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS TABLE 4: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS MIDDLE SCHOOLS Years 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Permanent Capacity-Existing @ 100%Utilization Rate 5,206 5,206 5,206 5,206 5,206 5.2Ur. Permanent Capacity-Future Added @ 100%Utilization Rate 0 0 0 0 0 C< Gross Totals @ 100%Utilization Rate 5,206 5,206 5,206 5,206 5,206 5,2vE Subtotal @ 95%Utilization Rate 4,946 4,9+46 4,946 4,946 4,946 4,946 Portable Classrooms Capacity @ 95%Utilization Rate u 3h 436 936 936 9.36 936 Total Capacity @ 95%Utilization Rate 5,882 5,882 5,882 5,882 5,882 5,882 Projected FTE Enrollment 4,SU-t 1,'l i 4,345 4,399 4,428 4,463 Permanent Capacity Surplus/Deficit 442 4?2 600 547 518 483 1. Permanent Capacity calculations are based on the 95%utilization factors(See Appendix 8). 2.The number of portables maybe reduced as permanent capacity projects come online and are open for instruction. Page 16 of 26 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS TABLE 5: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS HIGH SCHOOLS Years 2024-25 2025.26 2026.27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Permanent Capacity�Existing @ 100%Utilization Rate 5,180 5,180 5,180 5,180 6,780 6,780 Permanent Capacity-future Added @ 100%Utilization Rate 0 0 0 1,600 0 0 Gross Totals @ 100%Utilization Rate 5,180 5,180 5,180 6,780 6,780 6,780 Subtotal @ 95%Utilization Rate 4,921 4,921 4,921 6,441 6,441 6,441 Portable Classrooms Capacity @ 95°%Utilization Rate 952 9S2 952 952 952 952 Total Capacity @ 95%Utilization 114te 5,873 5,873 5,873 7,393 7,393 7,393 Projected PTE Enrollment ,7.3f, 5,712 5,717 5.612 5.615 5,594 Permanent Capacity Surplus/Deficit 815 -791 -796 829 S26 847 1. Permanent Capacity calculations are based or.the 95%utilization factors(See Appendix C). 2 The number of portables may be reduced as permanent capacity projects come on line and are open for irst,ruction. Page 17 of 26 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS DISTRICT: Issaquah School District#411 YEAR: 2024 School Site Acquisition Cost_ ({Acres)f Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity}x Student Generation Factor Facility cost/ Facility Student Factor Cast/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 7.00 $0 560 0,342 0.086 $0 $0 Middle/Jr High 10.00 $0 850 u.l•t1 010110 $0 50 High 40.00 $1,000,0M 1,600 D.153 0033 $3,825 5818 TOTAL $3,825 818 School Construction Cost; ({Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor)x(Permanent/Total Sq Ft) %Perm/ Facility Facility Student Factor cost/ cost/ Total Sq,Ft_ Cast Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Llerrieniary 92.37% $0 560 C.3•t2 0.014b 50 .4? Middle/Jr High 92.37% $0 850 0,146 0.040 $0 $0 High 92.37% $228,000,000 1.600 0,153 0.033 $20,138 $4,305 TOTAL $20,138 $4,305 Temporary Facility Cast: ({Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor)x(Tempo(ary/Total Square Feet) %Temp/ Facility Facility Student Factor Cost/ Cost/ Totals .Ft. Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 7,63% $0 so 0.342 O OfiF $0 50 Middle/Jr H;gh 7.63% $0 56 0.146 0:l?t: $0 $0 High 7.63% $0 224 0.153 0 D33 $0 40 TOTAL $0 $0 State Matching Credit: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Footage x District Klatch%x Student Factor Current Area Cost SPI District Student Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allowance Footage Match% SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $ 375.00 90 Ua% 0.342 0.086 $0 $0 Middle/Jr High $ 37S.00 108 0.00% 0.146 0.040 $0 $0 High School $ 375.00 130 36.72% 0.153 0 033 52.739 $585 TOTAL $2,739 585 Tax Payment Credit: SFR MFR Average Assessed Value $1,229,181 $525,201 Capital Bond interest Rate 3.49% 3.484% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $10,232,923 $4,372,296 Years Amorb2ed 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.15 $1.15 Present Value of Revenue Stream $11,768 $5,028 Fee Summary: Single-Famliy Multi-Family Site Acquistion Costs $3,824.79 $817,66 Permanent Facility Cost $20,137.84 $4.305-06 Temporary Facility Cost $0.00 $0.00 State Match Credit ($2,738 70) ($585.48) Tax Payment Credit ($11,767.86) ($5,028.14) Fee(as calculated) $9,456 07 ($490.90) Local Share @ 50%, $4,728 03 ($24SA5) Sum $4,728 ($245) Final Fee $4,728 $0 1. Each city or county sets and adopts the amount of the school impact fee. 2. For the applicable fee schedule,please consult with the permitting jurisdiction for the development pr-oject. Page 18 of 26 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION COST: • The District previously purchased a site for the new high school. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST: • High School $228,000,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional high school capacity PERCENTAGE OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: Total Square Footage 2,904,166 Permanent Square Footage *2,700,666 Temporary Square Footage *203,500 *Source - Capital Projects Facility Construction Data 2022-23 spreadsheet STATE MATCH CREDIT: Current Area Cost Allowance $375.00 Percentage of State Match 36.72% Page 19 of 26 APPENDIX A- 2023-24 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES APENDIX A: 2024-25 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES 1 V `yr. �o f`�,6 Q� ,q"h y° �3�� sr`�� cF4 � �� ``�" `�' ..¢�' ,�.�` c3�T �`Q` � �' f•{' �'�Q} ��, L7 b ti e $ 4�. APOLLO 28 560 3 36 59- 566 7 140 736 W, 0 0 736 1 140 Soo 66 l5 9RtARWOOD 26 520 3 36 SSc 528 11 220 776 73) 0 0 776 11 220 583 -55 154 CASCADE RIDGE 23 4W 2 24 48=1 460 8 160 644 612 0 0 6" 8 160 408 52 204 CEDAR TRAILS 23 460 3 36 49 471 0 0 496 471 6 120 616 6 120 379 92 92 CHALLENGER 22 "0 4 48 48x 464 14 280 768 730 0 0 768 14 290 379 85 351 CLARK -AU 600 3 36 e3f 604 10 200 836 794 0 0 936 i0 200 588 16 206 COUGAR FUDGE 28 S6f) 3 36 59t S68 8 160 7S6 718 0 0 756 8 160 467 99 251 CREEKSWE 27 S40 5 60 6Ge 570 10 200 800 ?60 0 0 800 10 200 556 14 204 DISCOWRY 27 540 4 48 S& 559 8 160 748 .i 0 0 748 8 160 484 75 227 ENDEAVOUR 26 S20 4 48 561b 540 8 160 728 692 0 0 128 8 160 47b 64 216 GRAND RODE 26 520 5 60 SW'- S51 12 240 820 779 0 0 920 12 1 240 554 -3 225 ISSAQUAH VALLEY 31 620 2 24 644 612 10 200 844 802 0 0 844 10 200 b24 -17 173 MAPLE HILLS 22 qr} 4 48 48S 464 1 80 568 S40, 0 0 568 t 80 4M -4 72 NEWCASTLE 2a adp 4 48 52e 502 160 6" 654 0 0 6" 160 i4L 54 206 SUNNY HILLS 3V 600 6 72 672 631r F2 240 912 86, 0 0 912 240 572 66 294 SUNSET 32 620 7 64 704 669 4 BO 784 '.r- 0 0 784 491 178 254 TOTAL 42,1 MO 62 744 9224 6763 134 2680 119M 1130. 6 120 12024 7982 781 4327 Minus excluded spaces for special program needs 1 Average of staffing ratios-Kindergarten-2nd grades 1:20,3rd-Sth grades 1:23 Average of staffing ratios for Special Ed a Kindergarten thru Sth grades 1:12 4 Permanent Capacity x 95%(utilrzation factor)Minors FTE Enrollment S Maximum Capacrty x 95%(utilization factor)Minus Headcount Enrolbrrent A.Permanent capacity reflects the building's level of service design capacity. 6. The maximum capacity includes the permanent capacity plus the maximum numb—f classrooms served in portables Page 20 of 26 APPENDIX B: 2023-24 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES APPENDIX B: 2024-25 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES z J h � -4¢ Tao G4 'r `1 C Ra �r�'r�'cG�" PCs 4( CP q'� as`� ti ,=C -� Q` k4 +S7 „. ,Q• GS ,C` �4�r "� i p �fi � ,� �e �� ® ,�.�' �`�, ,�.�' � �• Kra' ,,� ,� m ,,, � w� ��- / 9£AVER LAXE 28 72A 24 7>2 714 10 260 11ji2 961 C C 1012 10 260 732 -18 22 COUGAR MOONTAIN 30 780 1 48 82? 787 0 0 828 787 r C 828 0 0 638 149 14� i5SAQUAH;; DLE 28 728 :0 120 84a 806 8 208 1056 1003 C 0 1056 8 208 7% 10 20 MAYWOOD 40 '040 A 48 L088 1034 6 156 1244 1182 2 52 t296 8 208 816 218 36f PACIFIC CASCADE 28 728 7 84 812 771 8 208 1020 969 C 0 1020 8 208 626 145 313 FINE LAKE 31 8t� 72 87@ 834 2 1 52 1 930 884 C= C. 43�? 52 1 8% -62 -13 TOTAL 185 1-�-11 33 396 520h 4946 34 1 A91 1 6090 5786 2 936 4504 442 1282 1 Minus excluded spaces for special program needs s Average of staffing ratias=Wh thru Sth grades 1726 3 Average of staffing ratios for Sporial Ed=6th thru Sth grades 1.12 4 permanent Capacity x 99%(utilization factor)Minus Headcount Enrollment 5 htaximumCapacity K CJS%(utilisation factor)Minus Headcount Enrollment A, permanent rapacity reacts the building's level of service design capacity S, The maximum capacity includes the permanent rapacity plus the maximum number nt classroams served in nartables Page 21 of 26 APPENDIX C, 2023-24 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES APPENDIX C: 2024-25 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES _3 k t4 T QN- AT "S L e:, Zi ISSAQUAH HIGH 7i 2044 4 48 2092 1987 10 280 2372 2253 0 0 737 ?n 2 A0 2204 -217 LiB*RTY HIGH 40 1120 5 60 1180 1121 a 224 1404 1 334 0 0 ,404 224 1363 -242 GIBSON EK HIGH i(l 280 0 0 280 266 280 266 0 0 2F, _0 0 199 67 67 SKYLINE HIGH 1A (I�.11, 1547 207G 19 2 0 16 448— 1970 -423 TOTAL 5012 163 , 5"80 . 4922 1 34 y62 61132 5825 U 34 952 1 5736 -815 89 Minvs exj;juded spaces for special prog,,am needs Average of staffing ratios=9(h thtv 12th grode5,178 Avetage of staffing ratios for Special Ed=9til thru 12th gt;jdv%1:12 4 ciermament Capacity x 95%(utilor4tion factor)Minus Headcount Entrill"writ 5 Maximum Capacity w 95%(Wilitation f*CtW)Minus Hvadcounl Unruft"t A, Istimanent capacity refilech thi-P.l4jiI(%mg'%level of wro(#-design capiKitv Page 22 of 26 APPENDIX D: 2023-24 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES APPENDIX ©: 2024-25 TOTAL SCHOOLS CAPACITY 41, LV Lj kbl ELEMENTARY 424 8480 62 744 9224 8763 134 26W 11904 11309 6 120 12024 140 2800 7982 lei 33Z7 MIDDLE 185 4810 33 396 S20b 4946 34 884 6M S786 2 32 6147 36 936 4504 442 f282 HIGH 179 5412 14 168 S180 4921 34 9S2 6132 S925 0 0 6132 34 952 573b -615 99 TOTAL 78S 18302 109 1308 19610 18630 2U2 4516 24126 22920 8 172 24299 210 4688 18222 401 4E,gR 1 Minus excluded spaces for special program needs 2 Average of stalling ratios-Kindergarten.2nd grades 1:20,3rd-SO grades 1:23,6th-8th grades 116,9th-12th grades 1:28 !Average of staffing ratios for Special Ed-Kindergarten-12th grades 1:12 't Permanent Capacity x 9S%(utilization factor)Minus Headcount Enrollment 5 Maximum Capacity x 95%[utilization factor)Minus Headcount Enrollment A.Permanent capacity reflects the buildings level of service design capacity: B.The maximum capacity includes tM permanent capacity plus the maximum number of classrooms served in portables. Page 23 of 26 APPENDIX E: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Costto SECURED UNSECURED BUILDING/PROACT 1N/RM 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 CompieW LOCAL/STATE' LOCAL' New High School N S1,500,000 $88,000,000 $94,000,001) $80,000,000 $8,400..000 5900,000 $272,700,000 $90,000,000 S182,700,000 TOTALS $1,500,000 $89,000,000 $94,000,000 $80,000,000 $8,400,000 1 $800,000 $272,700,000 $90,000,000 5182,700,0.00 `N=New Construction M=Modernization-Rebuild 'The Issaquah School District,with voter approval,has front funded these projects_On May 23,2024 the tSD Board of Directors voted via resolution to reallocate $44,040,000 from the 2022 Levy. School impact fees may be utilized to offset front funded expenditures associated with the cost of new growth-related facilities,Impact fees are currently collected from the cities of Bellevue,Newcastle,Renton,Sammamish,Issaquah&King County for projects within the Issaquah School District. s Cast to complete does not include project expenditures from previous years. Page 24 of 26 APPENDIX F STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO FLO MEMORANDUM To: Thomas C. Mullins Date: April 9,2024 Issaquah School District 5150 220th Ave.SE Prayed No.: F2516.01_003 Issaquah,WA 98029 From: Alex Brasch Senior Population Geographer Re: 2023-24 Student Generation Rates r—Issaquah School District At the request of the Issaquah School District(ISD/District),FLO Analytics.(FLO)estimated student generation rates(SGRs)for residential housing units built in the district boundary between 2018 and 202Z The SGRs represent the average number of ISD K-12 students(October 2023 headcount) residing in new single-family(SF)detached and multifamily(MF)housing units.This memo details the methodology FLO used to create the SGRs and presents the findings by grade group and housing type. Methods King County operates school impact fee programs authorized by the Washington State Legislature RCW 82.02.040 and the Washington State Growth Management Act Chapter 36.70A RCW.School districts that intend to collect impact fees must submit a school board adopted Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)for review by the County Planning Commission and County Council that fulfills the specifications of state law,the County comprehensive plan,and the County code.According to King County code Title 2 1A Zoning,Section 43 Impact Fees,"the fee for each district shall be calculated based on the formula set out in Attachment A to Ordinance 11621'. A key component of any impact fee formula is the SGR.As defined in King County Ordinance 11621. SGRs or'Student Factors',"are to be provided by the school district based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of fee calculation.[...]Student(actors must be separately determined for single family and multifamily dwelling units,and for grade spans."In other words, SGRs represent the number of students residing in housing constructed within the most recent five- year period by housing type and grade group(i.e.,elementary, middle,and high school).King County code Title 21A.43 defines the housing types as such, "single family units shall mean single detached dwelling units,and multi-family units shall mean townhouses and apartments." SGR calculations are based on housing information and student residences.FLO obtained and processed the necessary housing data from the King County Assessor Office and GIS Center, including parcel/tax lot boundaries with essential attributes—housing type,number of housing units, and year built. Housing units constructed in 2023 were excluded from the analysis, because they may not have been completed and occupied by October 2023,To link the housing information to ISD students,the District provided FLO with October 2023 headcount enrollment,which FLO geocoded to FLO.Analytics 1 1888 847 0299 1 www.flo,an.alytics.com R:\F2516.01 Issaquah Schw Dtstricv-,003_2024.04.09 SGA Memoljssacivah SD 2023 SGR Merno.docx C,2024 FLO AraVcs Page 25 of 26 APPENDIX F STUDENT GENERATION RATES MEMO (cont) Issaquah School District Project No. F2516.01,003 April 9. 2024 Page 2 represent student residences.The student residences were then spatially matched to residential housing built in the district boundary between 2018 and 2022. With this combination of information,SGRs were calculated by dividing the number of students per grade group by the total number of housing units for each housing type.SGRs were, calculated for SF and MF dwellings built in the district within the analysis period.The MF category includes all structures with five or more housing units and the following structure types:townhome,duplex, triplex,and fourplex. Results Table 1 reports the number of housing units and SGRs for SF and MF dwelling types,as well as the number of students by grade group that have addresses matching the housing units.Table 2 reports the unit counts, number of students,and SGRs for individual developments with 25 or more housing units.Of the 18,501 students residing within the district, 750 live in the 1,170 SF units that were built between 2018 and 2022,while 194 live in the 1,223 MF units built in the same period.On average,each SF unit yields 0,641 K-12 students and each MF unit yields 0.159 K-12 students. Table 1: K-12 Students by Grade Group per Housing Unit Built 2018-2022 HousingType Housing Students SGRs Units K-S 6,9 912 K 12 K,,!5 6-8 9-12 K-12 Single-family 1,170 400 lit 1 ".4 750 0.342 0.146 0.153 0.641, MUltifanlity 1.223 1 1.05 49 40 194 0.086 0.040 0.033 0.159 Notes Housing units built in 2023 are excluded,because they may not have been completed and occupied by October 2023. King,County code Title 21A.43 defines the housing types as such.-single family units shaU mean single detached dwelling units,and muiti-family units snall mean townhouses and apartments." fa)The multrfarnily category includes all structures with five or more housing units and the following structure types: townhome,duplex,triplex,and fourpicii. Sources Issaquah School District 2023-24 headcount enrollment.King County parcels and housing inventory, Page 26 of 26 RESOLUTION NO. 4542 EXHIBIT C KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 415 SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2023-2024 THROUGH 2O29-2030 J U N E 2024 c KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT EQUITY I EXCELLENCE I COMMUNITY Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2023-2024 through 2029-2030 June 2024 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256"' Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7526 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Meghin Margel, President Mr. Awale Farah, Vice President Mr. Tim Clark, Legislative Representative Mr. Donald Cook, Director Mr. Andy Song, Director ADMINISTRATION Israel Vela Superintendent of Schools Dr. Wade Barringer, Deputy Superintendent Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations Sara Dumlao, Assistant Director of Business Services Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary.................................................................................................1 II - Six-Year Enrollment Projection .............................................................................4 III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service".................................................7 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students........................................ 8 IV- Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools............................................................9 V- Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan ..............................................................14 VI - Portable Classrooms...........................................................................................21 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity...............................................................25 Vill - Finance Plan .....................................................................................................30 IX- Summary of Changes to June 2024 Capital Facilities Plan.....................................34 X-Appendices..........................................................................................................35 I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2024 for the 2023-2024 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies,considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee-implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District,the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity,those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Functional capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the interim capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. i The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District's standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional interim capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI")on Form P-223.Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time"that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI (See Table 1). The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District's 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the District's capital projects homepage (link . Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website jttu. Based on revised student generation rates, our capacity and enrollment projections, the District will stay current with non-collection of student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2024 Capital Facilities Plan). 2 OCTOBER REPORT 1251 H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY For 2024 UP - Headcount Enrollment History LB=Live Births, LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 2018 October HC Enrollment 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 King County Live Births' 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 25,274 24,337 Incr/(Decr) 116 402 (122) 438 139 524 (737) Kindergarten/Birth% 8.17% 8.14% 7.98% 7.93% 6.68% 7.06% 7.41% 7 24% Kindergarten 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 1,836 1,874 1,761 Grade 1 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 1,768 1,945 1,931 Grade 2 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 1,818 1,840 1,966 Grade 3 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 1,938 1,887 1,878 Grade 4 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 1,924 1,953 1,924 Grade 5 2,103 2,189 2,170 2,120 1,937 1,872 1,953 1,973 Grade 6 Middle 1,952 2,119 2,184 2,164 2,024 11893 1,962 1,948 Grade 7 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 1,925 1,906 1,949 Grade 8 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 1,937 1,956 1,922 Grade 9 High 2,105 2,006 2,003 1,888 2,001 2,042 2,010 1,958 Grade 10 " 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,034 1,811 1,959 2,048 2,001 Grade 11 " 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,743 1,584 1,679 1,729 Grade 12 " 1,730 1,810 1,653 1,634 1,453 1,655 1,467 1,502 Total Enrollment 2 26,529 26,523 25,833 25,912 24,543 24,151 24,480 24,442 Yearly Headcount Incr/(Decry 17 (6) (690) 79 (1,369) (392) 329 (38) Cumulative Incr/(Decr) (302) (308) (998) 1 (919) (2,288) (2,680) (1 959) (2,718) 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health,Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. 2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE"&"B2"or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education)and excludes College-only Running Start students. T,%hlr% 4 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the District relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick's study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the winter of 2022. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 2). 7.24% of 24,337 King County live births in 2018 is projected for 1,761 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2023. This is a decrease of 937 live births in King County over the previous year. Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE"), "Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2024 going forward rely upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the "low growth" methodology. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. 4 STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .229 Middle .087 High .113 Total .429 Multi-Family Elementary .109 Middle .037 High .054 Total .200 The student generation factor is based on 2,062 new SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2017 and 2022. The student generation factor is based on 1,709 new MF (Multi- Family) units built during the same period. The multi-family units consisted of 1,379 apartment units and 330 townhome units. The District sees an average of 43 students for every 100 single family units that are built and an average of 20 students for every 100 multi-family units that are built. The rate for apartment units is higher than for townhome units. The District sees an average of 23 students for every 100 apartment units and only 6 students for every 100 townhome units. The student generation rate also varies among apartment developments, based on the number of bedrooms in the unit. Units with three plus bedrooms have much higher student generation rates than units that have two or fewer bedrooms. Noting these differences can help the District when planning for future growth from housing. In preparing the 2023-2024 to 2029-2030 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Educational Data Solutions, LLC led by Dr. Les Kendrick, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. Within the District's borders there are several income-based and multi-family housing projects coming on-line in 2023/2024. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. At the start of the 2023-24 school year, 2 apartment complexes;Alexan Gateway and Station by Vintage have been excluded from the available multi-family units because the units have not been completed and/or have not been released to be rented. 5 2023 - 2029 Enrollment Projections Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2018 LB in 2019 LB in 2020 LB in 2021 LB in 2022 LB in 2023 Est LB in 2024 ACTUAL PROJECTED ENROLLMENT ENROLLMENT October 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 King County Live Births 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,390 23,012 23,973 24,428 Incr/(Decr) (937) (247) (404) (296) (378) 961 455 Kindergarten/ Birth % 1 7.24% 7.53% 7.60% 1 7.61% 1 7.94% 7.75% 7.60% FD Kindergarten 1,761 1,814 1,801 1,781 1,827 1,857 1,857 Grade 1 1,931 1,893 1,902 1,888 1,849 1,897 1,918 Grade 2 1,966 1,961 1,946 1,955 1,931 1,891 1,930 Grade 3 1,878 2,004 2,017 2,002 2,011 1,986 1,936 Grade 4 1,924 1,861 2,013 2,026 2,010 2,019 1,985 Grade 5 1,973 1,887 1,893 2,047 2,060 2,044 2,043 Grade 6 Middle 1,948 2,009 1,950 1,955 2,114 2,128 2,101 Grade 7 1,949 1,973 2,005 1,946 1,952 2,111 2,114 Grade 8 1,922 1,937 1,991 2,024 1,965 1,970 2,120 Grade 9 Nigh 1,958 1,939 1,993 2,049 2,083 2,022 2,018 Grade 10 2,001 1,990 1,958 2,012 2,069 2,103 2,031 Grade 11 1,729 1,754 1,755 1,726 1,774 1,824 1,845 ------------ Grade 12 1,502 1,695 1,678 1,680 1,652 1,698 1,737 Total Enrollment Projection 24,442 24,717 24,902 25,091 25,297 25,550 25,635 Yearly Incr/(Decr) (38) 275 185 189 206 253 85 Yearly Incr/(Decr) % -0.16% 1.13% 0.75% 0.76% 0.82% 1.00% 0.33% Total Enrollment Projection" 24,442 24,717 24,902 25,091 25,297 25,550 25,635 'Does not include iGrad,RS Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study Dec '22 ("Preferred Forecast") III - Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanentfacilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students • Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. • Class size ratio for grades 4 - 5 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided with music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Career and Technical Education (CTE) — State Program Closing Educational Achievement Gaps (Title I — Part A) - Federal Program Highly Capable Students (HiCap) - State Program Learning Assistance Program (LAP) —State Program Multilingual Education (MLE) - State Program Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 students, depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. • The average class size ratio for grades 6-8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs,the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 66% for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 56% utilization at the elementary level. 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently,the District has permanent function al capacity to house 35,494 students and interim (portable) capacity to house 4,238. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity(See Table 3).The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 89% - 11%. The functional capacity is periodically updated for changes in the programs, additional classrooms, and new schools. Functional capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the fall of 2023. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad is an Open Door (Drop-out Reengagement) School that offers a second plus chance to students aged 16-21 who have dropped out of high school or are at risk of not earning a high school diploma by age 21. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan, because it is served as a leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 434 students. Kent Virtual Academy - The Kent Virtual Academy is open to grades 6-12 and is currently serving 108 students. The virtual school offers a flexible learning experience designed to engage students when and where they work best. Each school day includes a combination of live (synchronous) virtual instruction and on-demand (asynchronous) learning opportunities outside of a traditional bell schedule. Students can attend live virtual lessons with their teachers and classmates, participate in live virtual class or small group discussions, check-in or meet with teachers, watch recorded video lessons, work independently on projects and lessons, participate in learning experiences outside the school setting for credit or to meet competencies. Virtual school students may also attend their boundary school for select classes and services. 9 ;e Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 626 Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 568 ,ton Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 744 ,00d Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 629 ill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 779 Id Park Elementary 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 653 ,od Elementary 1969 FW 16600- 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 528 T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 640 Ige Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 591 -ake Elementary 1971 GL 28700- 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 595 n Elementary 1990 HE 27641- 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 634 s Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 641 lementary 1999 KE 24700- 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 760 oungs Elementary 1965 LY 19660- 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 725 Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 768 )w Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710- 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 706 an Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 793 nium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 688 O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 864 �r Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 744 rchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 701 -ee Elementary 1967 PT 27825- 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 732 good Elementary 1987 RW 18030- 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 661 ,idge Elementary 2021 RR 22420 Military Rd. S., SeaTac, WA 98198 886 r Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 549 Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 837 reek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 591 brook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 730 Elementary 1992 SR 22300- 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 719 lementary TOTAL 201082 i Ridge Middle 1966 CR 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 1,110 Heights Middle 1993 CH 19640 SE 272nd Street, Covington 98042 1,140 )n Middle 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 1,020 �r Middle 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 1,224 an Middle 1958 MM 23480- 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 1,110 eek Middle 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 1,200 vood Middle 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 1,140 ddle TOTAL 7,950 Aeridian High 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 2,595 ke High 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 2,714 Ige High 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,932 ood High 1981 KW 25800- 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,917 TOTAL 11,158 aboratory Academy 2021 KLA 105 SE 208th St., Kent, WA 98031 542 CT TOTAL 39,732 Kent School District 2023/ 24 School Year High School Boundaries ukwila N SeaTac Kentridge High School Maple Valey Kent Kent Meridian 2 High School Kentwood • High School• �gwon Kentlake High School • Lea Hill Auburn 0 2 4 8 Miles i i i I i I King County,WA State Parks GIS,Esri,HERE,Garmin,SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS,Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Legend High School Kentridge High Buildings School -- Kent-Meridian Kentwood High High School School I - Kentlake High �.__ School Kent School District 2023/2024 School Year Middle School Boundaries N East Renton Highlands Renton Tukwila Northwood SeaTac • Meeker Meridian Maple Mill Creek • Valley • Kent • Mattson • Canyon Ridge Ceu.ington • Cedar Heights Lea Hill Auburn King County,WA State Parks GIs,Esri, HERE,Garmin,SafeGraph, METI/NASA, 0 1.88 3.75 7.5 Miles USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Middle Schools Mattson Middle Mill Creek Middle I Cedar Heights School School Middle School Meeker Middle Northwood Middle -- Canyon Ridge School School Middle School Meridian Middle School 12 Kent School District 2023/2024 School Year Elementary Boundaries Highlands Renton N Tukwila Fairwood Carriage Ridgewood SeaTac Crest Springbrook Glenridge Lake Youngs Panther Emerald Lale Park ,,Soos Creek River Ridge 9 Park Orchard Sunrise Maple Neely O Brien East Hill Valley Kent GeorgeT. Daniel Martin Kett Sortun Meridian Crestwood Scenic Hill Cedar Valle Millennium Covington Jenkins y Covington Creek" Horizon Meadow Ridge Pine Tree Grass Lake I ea Hill Sawyer Woods r Auburn 0 1.88 3.75 7.5 Miles King County,WA State Parks GIS,Esri, HERE,Garmin,SafeGraph, METI/NASA, I i I i I I I I USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Fairwood Meadow Ridge Ridgewood Carriage Crest Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Glenridge Meridian River Ridge Cedar Valley Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Grass Lake Millennium Sawyer Woods Covington Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Horizon Elementary Neely O Brien Scenic Hill Crestwood Jenkins Creek Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary Panther Lake Soos Creek Daniel Elementary Kent Elementary Elementary Elementary Lake Youngs Park Orchard Springbrook East Hill Elementary Elementary Elementary Elementary y y Emerald Park Elementary Martin Sortun Pine Tree Sunrise Elementary Elementary 13 Elementary Elementary Schools V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This bonding authority provided for the replacement of Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, the new River Ridge Elementary school, and our new Kent Laboratory Academy, which both opened in August 2021. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision- makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from schools and bus stops, as well as bus pull-outs and turn- arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Toble 4&Sitemop). Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for future schools and district use; the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for the purchase of additional sites but may also be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements, and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Our District went out for a Bond Measure in April of 2023 and did not receive enough votes for approval. We reevaluated the District needs and looked at next steps to align with the Strategic Plan which continues to make it a priority to revitalize, rejuvenate and rebuild our aging schools as well as begin a process to remove interim classroom portables and find room or create permanent structures to reduce and eventually eliminate the more than 166 portable classrooms in our District. We will continue to determine capacity versus enrollment as well as programs to ensure this goal to reduce and or eliminate all portables in our District is obtained in the next several years. As a part of the planning process, the District has been tracking a few major development projects which have affected enrollment and will continue to increase students' forecasts. On Meeker Street in Kent, we have seen several major apartment complexes, ETHOS and Midtown 64 Apartments. These continue to have an impact on enrollment as they fill up their newly built facilities. The Alexian Gateway Project is located on the corner of Military Road and Veterans Drive in Kent and has begun occupying its 283 units in 2023-2024. In Covington, we are tracking a multi-family house development which has been approved and construction has begun. The 1700-unit Lakepointe Urban Community will fall within our 14 enrollment boundary and proposed completion of Phase 4 is shown to be 2027. Construction in the Kent School District boundaries have been steadily rising over the last four years and planned communities are now being recognized through the planning teams in multiple city and county jurisdictions we serve. 15 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected %for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type I Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate Map ELEMENTARY Map MIDDLE&HIGH TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity At on 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land use Land Use Map I Designation Type Jurisdiction 12 256th-Covington(Halleson) 25435 SE 256th,Covington 98042 Rural Sold King County 12a 156th-Covington(Wikstrom) 25847 156th Ave.SE,Covington 98042 Rural To be sold King County 16 White House-Kent(Top) 11027 SE Kent-Kangley Kent,WA 98030 Commercial Purchased King County 16a Green Building-Kent(iGrad) 11109 SE Kent-Kangley Kent,WA 98030 Commercial Purchased King County Notes: None Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 16 Fairwood t IaICW00{l • Elementary MCMICKEM HTS d s E A Ridgewood Orl l l l a Carnage Crest /7 �a�� A _ ( EjementarY ElementaryWqrthW I o Caiddle Middle \ " M Sc �f Meeker Middle School ke Youngs y t s' _ �1 + u r r� �l f 'i p A H T ,■.0 R Eentary v "K i 7� ca`Su Glenrld g e ■ "' s� 'pp Sprin_gbr Elementary rj A IIAU Elementa ti ■ ( , L A K E IW p rrJp Kent Laboratory Kentrirjge i �+ ` j Academy !E _. ke • High School f�i Wat,T'... - _ Emerald Park - - ea O'BrienPanther lake■ ■ Elementary - U D� Elementary �11, is �?• V `6 ..--s5 Soos Creek Elementary \-v;0'oil` 1 K ■ ` M River Ridge /! E N' T i ■Sunrise ! :, ��=•n� `�. c,� ` R�r �!j Elementary �. _ _ _r. y ©■ Elementary Park Orchard Nr r es + Elementary r ry j Neel O'3 en - ,T / i rzsz Elementary ■ /ro ■ Meridian j._.----� Middle Schooln2 c )! t Mill Creek Eask Hill • ill r l P I T School Elementary _ .--- —. r - c�k. _�. I ■ Daniel J Mattson ! Di + Kent - ` j Elementary Martin ."" % + Elertuntary'�- ;> �p t Sortun Middle School ; ( - � • Early Learning\ Ken Meridian Elementary • Crestwood Center �� High School ;Elerentary `" Y 0• Kent School District ■° ■ ,East �an istration Wilderness �r. - irt - -- �' - ..: Cent ■M r!'i ■ .AeLLtood i� rn Ir �j .✓. Graff 9 - r 2- j • h EI Iq�e a High School l ke Scenic Hill P) / g -- Cedar Valley Elementary' 1e e�r ■Elementary \1 El t�k� >t Cedar Heights p D - ■ Mille"ium sH"Co, + �'� Middle School S A l; Elementary _ _ _ rT . I S; ml } LAKE r _ Meadow Ridge ■ Pine Tree Horizon T I Elementary .Elementa Thomas Elementary ■ r � pp YQnngton Grass Lake -'0.• \}Barr dale Elementary • �tiiYYcr� _ hf (Soos) �b13 10 � , KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT wk J Kentlake --TIT High School r SITE ACQUISITIONS -- Le,e�H l(� Sawyer `h❑! Elementa Wynaco17 n copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY,INC. This map has been modified by KSD 05/22 r 23 p4 � i 1 , ti n - 21po 2 4 - , '. 3 1. \\ \ 2 �p0 2�1 l \� 22 3�2 23 , --- TRASH ENCLOSURES � `\ �' \ TIT '\' x 11\ �1 �A 2 ruction of Covington Connector to of first phase of commercial ears 2020-2025 ^r, construction of 191 st Place SE idential development, construction of opment on peninsula. ears 2023-2028 . imercial development. ears 2020-2027 Phase 3 m, construction of MR and ' a Phase I B ' (' Phase 4 0 Phase 2 g/o v O O h c � Stop Light Bike Route ' Proposed-trail Parking - Jenkins Creek r` T Pedestrian/Wildlife Undercrossing R-6 OPEN SPACE —y --�=- --- r. - Y y %l f OF 1,880.037 SF �� ''`'� F ;[ •iP.V, o 43.16 AC P"+ UNI)I h n:1 ►y .. # RGAIU PARK; 24,950 51 MR OPEN SPACE— 22,507 SF 0.52 AC MR PARKS s O.i7 AC B 12.799 SF :5 R-12 OPEN SPACE. 019 AC 5,687 SF 0.13 A L R-12 PARK. „ a 32,553 SF )- OJ5 AC SPLCIAL P M AVECN I - ;f - R-6 PARKS i r _ 14,1 12 SF 0.32 AC p i \IK P.AK0 •` R 6 OPEN SPACE . ` I 0.686 tiI 139.837 SF 2.54 AC 3.21 AC � MR PARKS 128.42 5 SF 2.95.95 AC c, R-12 ON A<PACE -12 PARKS 12,500 SE 0.29 AC f . C� ' A u tit COMBINED_OPEN SPACE TABLE ZONE GROSS PARKS 2 ACREAGE RCMU 91.25 AC 2.81 AC a .. MR 34.00AC 5.78AC R-6 53.51 AC 0.55 AC R-12 1 35.34 AC I.53 AC TOTAL 214.10 AC 10.67 AC r *OPEN SPACE INCLUDES CRITICAL AREAS, BI **NET ACRES EQUALS GROSS ACREAGE MIN PARKS TABLE OPEN SPA( ZONE SQFOOTAGE ACREAGE ZONE RCMU 122,577 SF 2.81 AC RCMU MR 25 1.910 SF S.78 AC MR R-6 24,020 SF 0.55 AC R-6 VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. Currently,the District utilizes portables to house students more than functional capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B,Q. Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity requirement (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated and maintained. The District's goal is to reduce the number of portables so we may provide an equitable learning environment for all. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors -Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K- 5) 0.229 Elementary (Grades K-5) 0.109 Middle (Grades 6-8) 0.087 Middle (Grades 6- 8) 0.037 High (Grades 9-12) 0.113 High (Grades 9-12) 0.054 Total 0.429 Total 0.200 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI -Square Footage per Student, see side chart Elementary 0 Elementary 90 Middle 0 Middle 117 High (Academy) 0 High 130 Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 12 Average Site Cost/Acre Middle (required) 25 Elementary $161,678 High (required) 40 Middle $0 High $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary $68,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle $155,000,000 Elementary @ 24 $315,000 High $220,000,000 Middle @ 29 $315,000 High @ 31 $315,000 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit Elementary 123,702 District Funding Assistance Percentage 52.88% Middle 10,256 High 21,296 Total 4A% 155,254 Construction Cost Allocation CCA-Cost/Scl, Ft. $375.00 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,567,594 Middle 760,483 District Average Assessed Value High/Other 1,077,315 Single Family Residence $594,679 Total 95.6% 3,405,392 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,691,296 Multi-Family Residence $310,811 Middle 770,739 High/Other 1,098,611 Total 3,560,646 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $1.11 Current Rate /1,000 Tax Rate 0.0011 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.48% CPI Inflation Factor 5.80% Budget Preparations I OSPI (www.k12.wa.us) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A) May 2024 Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.229 A 2(Middle) 25 $0 0 0.087 A 3 (High) 40 $0 0 0.113 Total 77 $161,678 0 0.429 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity T Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.229 0.903 B 2 (Middle) $155,000,000 0 0.087 0.984 B 3 (High) $220,000,000 0 0.113 0.998 Total $443,000,000 0 0.429 B -:> $0.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence(Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.229 0.097 $291.55 C 2 (Middle) $315,000 29 0.087 0.016 $15.12 C 3 (High) $315,000 31 0.113 0.020 $22.96 Total $945,000 84 0.429 C 41 $329.63 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly"State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq.Ft./Student Assistance% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $375.00 115 0.5288 0.229 $5,222.23 D 2 (Middle) $375.00 148 0.5288 0.087 $2,553.31 D 3 (High) $375.00 173 0.5288 0.113 $3 876 57 D $11,652.11 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value(AAV) $594,679 Net Present Value(per EQ)(NPV) 8.32 Current Debt Service Rate/1,000 ( r) 0.11% TC $5,473.99 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 3.48% Years Amortized (10 Years)-Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap** A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $0.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $329.63 Subtotal $329.63 D = State Match Credit per Residence $11,652.11 TC=Tax Credit per Residence $5,473.99 Subtotal $17,126.10 Total Unfunded Need ($16,796.47) 50%Developer Fee Obligation ($8,398) FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) $0 District Adjustment $8,398 Net Fee Obligation per Residence-Single Family $O,QQ Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre I Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.109 A 2 (Middle) 25 $0 0 0.037 A 3 (High) 40 $0 0 0.054 Total 77 $161,678 0 0.200 A $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.109 0.903 B 2 (Middle) $155,000,000 0 0.037 0.984 B 3 (High) $220,000,000 0 0.054 0.998 Total $443,000,000 0 0.200 B K' $0.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)x Student Factor)x(Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.109 0.097 $138.77 C 2 (Middle) $315,000 29 0.037 0.016 $6.43 C 3 (High) $315,000 31 0.054 0.020 $10.97 Total $945,000 84 0.200 C -:> $156.18 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly"State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance% x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq.Ft./Student Equalization% Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $375.00 115 0.5288 0.109 $2,485.69 D 2 (Middle) $375.00 148 0.5288 0.037 $1,085.89 D 3 (High) $375.00 173 0.5288 0.054 $1,852.52 D $5,424.10 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value(AAV) $310,811 Net Present Value(per EQ)(NPV) 8.32 Current Debt Service Rate/1,000 ( r) 0.11% TC $2,861.00 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 3.48% Years Amortized (10 Years)-Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility/Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap** A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $0.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $156.18 Subtotal $156.18 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $5,424.10 TC=Tax Credit per MF Unit $2,861.00 Subtotal $8,285.10 Total Unfunded Need ($8,128.92) 50%Developer Fee Obligation ($4,064) FC=Facility Credit(if applicable) 0 District Adjustment $4,064 Multi-family Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the functional capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the functional capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the State of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2023 was 24,442 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2023,there were 1087 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 560 attended classes only at the college ("college-only") and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space,the District plans to continue to satisfy required capacity through the interim use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). While the District currently shows available capacity to address projected need on a purely statistical basis, there are variety of extenuating factors that need to be considered. The Kent School District currently makes significant use of portables, which we do not consider as part of our permanent standard of service. We have included portable space in our interim capacity figures, and we do not count that as a permanent space solution. Kent is unusual in that it incorporates neighborhoods intersecting with at least 6 municipalities, including Kent, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, Renton, and SeaTac. The district covers 73 square miles and includes over 40 schools. Within this large geographic area, we expect to have pockets of localized capacity need that are not necessarily reflected in the aggregate figures. As one example, the Lakepointe Urban Village development in Covington may require new classroom capacity even as space may exist in schools on the far other end of the District's boundaries. 25 ■ ■\V,/rV ■ rV r■V■Is\/rv■V■v■m ■ M■■M Vr\■ r\V■ ■ ■ TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029- Actual P R O J E C T E D lanent Functional Capacity 1 35,494 I 35,494 I 35,494 I 35,494 I 35,494 I 35,494 I 35,4� Iges to Permanent Capacity ' Capacity Increase (F) ional Permanent Classrooms 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotall 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,494 35,4� m Portable Capacity antary Portable Capacity Required 3,255 3,201 3,201 3,201 3,201 3,201 3,20 e School Portable Capacity Required 375 375 375 375 375 375 37E School Portable Capacity Required 608 608 608 608 608 608 60E Interim Portable Capacity Total 4,238 4,184 4,184 4,184 4,184 4,184 4,18 OTAL CAPACITY 39,732 39,678 39,678 39,678 39,678 39,678 39,6, otal Enrollment/Projection 2 24,385 24,225 24,197 24,201 24,265 24,378 24,3, ISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 15,347 15,453 15,481 15,477 15,413 15,300 15,3: )acity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. )jection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Low Growth Model") ELEMENTARY: Grades K - 5 Elementary Grade K-5 SCHOOL YEAR 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 1 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Actual P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Capacity ' 16,827 I 16,64 I 16,696 I 16,696 ( 16,696 I 16,696 I 16,696 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 16,827 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Interim Portable Capacity 3,255 3,201 3,201 3,201 3.201 3,201 3,201 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 20,082 19,897 19,897 19,897 19,897 19,897 19,897 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 11,433 11,420 11,572 11,699 11,688 11,694 11,669 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 8,649 8,477 8,325 8,198 8,209 8,203 8,228 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Low Growth Model") MIDDLE SCHOOL: Grades 6 - 8 Middle School Grade 6-8 SCHOOL YEAR 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 1 2027-28 1 2028-29 2029-30 Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacity ' 7,575 ( 7,216 I 7,216 I 7,216 I 7,216 I 7,216 I 7,216 Changes to Middle School CapacityI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 7,575 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Portable Interim Capacity , 375 375 375 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 7,950 7,591 7,591 7.591 7,591 7.591 7,591 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 5,819 5,919 5,946 5,925 6,032 6,209 6,335 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 2,131 1,672 1,645 1,666 1,559 1,382 1,256 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Low Growth Model") KEW SCHUUL DISTKICI NO. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY HIGH SCHOOLS: Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 1 2026-27 2027-28 1 2028-29 1 2029-30 Actual P R O 1 E C T E D Hi h Permanent Capacity ' 10,550 I 10,097 I 10,097 I 10,097 I ( 10,097 I 10,097 Changes to High School Capacity 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 10,550 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Portables Interim Capacity 1 608 608 608 608 608 608 608 TOTAL CAPACITY 11,158 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 10,705 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 2 7,195 7,378 7,384 7,467 7,578 7,647 7,631 SURPLUS DEFICIT CAPACITY 3,963 3,327 3,321 3,238 3,127 3,058 3,074 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source:Les Kendrick Demographic Study,2022("Low Growth Model") Kant Srhnnl Dktrirt Six-Yaar Canital Farilitia,Plan Table 5 C Mav 7n74 VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2023-2024 through 2029-2030.The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described below are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees were used at both River Ridge Elementary School and Kent Laboratory Academy projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the Pacific Northwest. According to RCW 82.02.090, the definition of an impact fee is ". . . a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development, and that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. Impact fee' does not include a reasonable permit or application fee." Mitigation or impact fees can be calculated on the basis of "unhoused student need" or "the maintenance of a district's level of service" as related to new residential development. A mitigation/impact fee may be imposed based upon a determination of insufficient existing permanent and/or interim portable school space or to pay for permanent and/or newly acquired interim portable school space previously constructed as a result of growth in the district. A district's School Board must first approve the application of the mitigation or impact fees and, in turn, approval must then be granted by the other general government jurisdictions having responsibility within the district, counties, cities and towns (Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, SeaTac, and Unincorporated King County). Though the current enrollment projections increase for both elementary and secondary schools are relatively flat, the ongoing need to provide permanent instructional facilities to house students is a driving need as the shifts in our family populations continue, due to ongoing development. Previously collected impact fees may be used to support and address the challenges related to the number of interim instructional facilities currently in use, the replacement of some of these aged facilities,the maintenance of the district's level of services, and the potential expansions to existing facilities in future years. The Kent School District 2023-2024 CFP update includes continued execution of the 2016 Capital Bond Projects, the 2018 Levy Projects, and the data collection and review of our Facility Assessment Reports. The District Facilities and Capital Planning Teams had come together and joined the Capital 30 Bond Planning Task Force (CBPTF) which included District personnel, design professionals, teaching staff, student voices, as well as community members who collaborated and discussed the District's needs. The initial plan revealed priorities including school replacement due to age, and the need for added permanent facilities to (1) reduce and eliminate our need for portables and (2) accommodate future growth as housing in the Kent region continues to expand. We started with a list of 2 billion in needs and through itemizing and prioritizing, we brought the list of essential projects to 495 million. This list was brought before the District's Board of Directors for comments, discussion, and approval. A Capital Bond Measure followed and went out to vote in April 2023 and did not pass with voter approval. After the failure to pass the 2023 Bond, we re-evaluated needs and for next steps. Surveys went out to the community to see what people would like to prioritize from the list of needed projects. A new list of projects was presented through the 2023 Levy in November. This levy did not pass. This list was again taken and revised to prioritize projects that are critical to operations and life safety within our buildings. In April we set forth our 2024 Levy to a vote, which also did not receive the needed support to pass. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will include details of any adopted planning. With the opening of Canyon Ridge Middle School, our sixth grade moving from elementary to middle school, and our boundary change, we have advanced opportunities to even out capacity at each site to accommodate our programs, district-wide site capacity, and student-based needs. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Team. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction estimated costs are based on the last elementary school built in Kent, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost future elementary school, as well as average pricing of nearby school districts recently built new middle and new high school projects. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School $68,000,000 New Middle School $155,000,000 New High School $220,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C result in a zero-dollar impact fee total for this year but may be adjusted if needed per RCW 36.70A.130(2)(b) provision. 31 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Imp< SCHOOL FACILITIES 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 TOTAL Local&State State 2 or Local 3 FeeE Estimated Est= 'ERMANENT FACILITIES cool Projects at this time. $0 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3-4 $0 OTHER N/A Totals so so $o so so $o $0 $o $o $0 = Funded U = Unfunded =S: ie District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3cility needs are pending review.Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. ost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. yes in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Nurcnasea School / Site Sold Location I Acreage I Cost/Price I Avg cost-price/acre I T Acquisitions for Elemenary Schools QC SO Elementary Site Subtotal 0.00 Acquisitions for Middle Schools 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 Acquisitions for High 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 Note:All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank&Acquisitions Map on Page 1 Covington area North (So of Mattson MS) 1984 Ham Lake east (Pollard) 1992 Total Acreage&Cost Total Average Shady Lake(Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline) 1995 9-08 $9 #DIV SE of Lake Morton area (West property) 1993 0 McMillan Assemblage(South of MC) 98-04 Yeh-Williams(W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288) 1999 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom) 2004 SE 256th St. Covington(West of CO) 2004 11027 SE Kent-Kangley Kent,WA 98030 2023 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2024 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2023 Plan are summarized here. Capacity changes continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio and program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The District moved to a K-5 Elementary and 6-8 Middle School model beginning at the 2023- 2024 school year. Capacity has been added at the middle school level by reopening the original Sequoia Junior High (now Canyon Ridge Middle School). The District worked with Educational Data Solutions, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The District expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility need will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2024 calendar year will result in no collection of impact fees for both Single-Family and Multi-Family due to the capacity study completed in spring 2024. 34 x - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: Grade Increase/ ITEM FROM TO Comments /Type Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.248 0.229 -0.019 Single Family (SF) MS 0.085 0.087 0.002 SH 0.107 0.113 0.006 Total 0.440 0.429 -0.011 Student Generation Factor Elem 0.130 0.109 -0.021 Multi-Family (MF) MS 0.049 0.037 -0.012 SH 0.056 0.054 -0.002 Total 0.235 0.200 -0.035 State Funding Assistance Ratios ("State 51.86% 52.88% 1.02% Per OSPI Website Match") Area Cost Allowance $246.83 $375.00 128.170 Per OSPI Website Link Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $653,485 $594,679 (158,806) King County AV-Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $290,599 $310,811 20,212 King County Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 $1.02 $1.11 $0.09 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.58% 3.48% -0.10% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change RESOLUTION NO. 4542 EXHIBIT D 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403 J U LY 2024 D Ldnton CAPITAL PLANNING S-40DL DISTRICT AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICE I EXCELLENCE I EQUITY DATE: June 18, 2024 TO: Dr. Damien Pattenaude, Superintendent FROM: Matt Feldmeyer, Executive Director Capital Planning and Construction FOR BOARD DATE: June 26, 2024 6/iv)-LA CONSENT AGENDA ITEM: 2024-2030 Capital Facilities Plan A Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan, to be updated annually, is required by the Washington State Growth Management Act and the School Impact Fee Ordinance Act, of King County, Code Title 21A. It serves as a guide to the development of school facilities and forms the basis for the calculation of school impact fees that are imposed on new development by King County and the cities whose service areas overlap the Renton School District. The Plan is intended to evaluate the need for future facilities based on forecast enrollment growth and student capacity of existing facilities. The plan also identifies potential sources of funding for additional building construction or acquisition. DISTRICT GOAL(S): Removing Barriers & Supporting Students BUDGET IMPLICATION.- This item has no budget implication. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the District's 2024 Capital Facilities Plan. Attachments: 2024 Capital Facilities Plan Board A roved Recommendations I ha reviewed and co end approval of this requ t: we 4- 1' nifer ar er _ Date A sistant perinten ent of Finance and Operations/CFO SERVICE I EXCELLENCE I EQUITY 7812 S 124", St, Seattle. Washington 98178-4830 1 p 425.204 4403 1 f 425 204 4476 2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Stefanie McIrvin, Ed. D, President Justin Booker, Vice President Avanti Bergquist, MD Susan Talley Pam Teal Damien Pattenaude, Ed. D, Superintendent i1 k a. i I < X July 2024 OW enton SCHOOL DISTRICT SERVICE I EXCELLENCE I EQUITY Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx i To Be Adopted by School Board June 26, 2024 2024 6-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Annual Update Renton School District No. 403 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. ENROLLMENT TRENDS III. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS V. GROWTH RELATED PROJECTS VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN VII. IMPACT FEES VIII. APPENDICES I i Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx i i I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan: This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan(the "Plan") annual update was prepared by Renton School District(the"District") in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act(GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21 A.43, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Bellevue,Newcastle, and Renton. It is the district's intent that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton as a sub-element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans, and that that those jurisdictions assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of the district, as empowered by the GMA. This Plan, however, is not intended to be the sole planning instrument developed by the district to determine its capital facility needs. The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing development, most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area. The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington's growth by developing and implementing comprehensive land-use and transportation plans, by designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally critical areas. The Capital Facilities Plan is one element of a County or City's Comprehensive Plan that addresses existing public facility capacities, forecasts future public facility needs,presents a plan for expanding existing facilities or constructing new facilities to meet those needs, and indicates how those public facility improvements are to be financed. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as one means of financing new public facilities necessitated by private development. This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by examining: 1. anticipated growth of the district's student population over the next six years. 2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to house those students based on the district's current Standard of Service. 3. the need for additional enrollment or growth driven capital facilities. 4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and 5. calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number of students generated by recent residential development(student generation factors). This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub-element in their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and the Cities of Bellevue,Newcastle, and Renton. The district continues to dialogue with the cities of Tukwila and SeaTac regarding implementation of impact fees within their jurisdictions. The new impact fees calculated and associated with this 2024 CFP, are effective Jan 2025. They are further defined in section VII and in the appendices. Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad WABoard Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx z effective effective IMPACT FEES January January CHANGE 2024 2025 SINGLE-FAMILY $2,161 $1,003 $1,158 MULTI-FAMILY $4,257 $3,268 $989 Overview of the Renton School District: The district is located on the south end of Lake Washington, eleven miles south of Seattle to the west and south of Bellevue to the east. Home to nearly 100,000 people who value working, living, and playing in the Pacific Northwest, Renton has a strong economic base and a favorable business climate. The district spans approximately thirty-two square miles and serves a diverse population of approximately 15,000 students in pre-K through 12th grade at 4 high schools, four middle schools, fifteen elementary schools, and an early childhood learning center. District programs also address the special needs of disabled, academically gifted, and artistically talented students. Four schools (Renton Park Elementary, Hazelwood Elementary, McKnight Middle, and Lindbergh High) are U.S. Department of Education-recognized Blue-Ribbon Schools of Excellence. Community support for Renton schools is strong. School levies, which make up 25% of the district's budget, have been consistently approved by the community for more than 20 years. Voter-approved bond measures or capital facilities levies from 1992 through 2022 have brought exciting improvements in school buildings and support facilities, including the rebuilding of all elementary schools, the remodeling of all middle and high schools, and the recent additional construction of a new elementary school (Sartori) and middle school (Risdon). Voter support has also provided state-of-the-art technology - a must to prepare students for living and working in this leading high-tech region. Every classroom has high-speed Internet connections and ample computer devices for all students. Creating life-long learners is at the heart of Renton School District's instructional goals. Students are encouraged to reach for excellence through a variety of programs that focus on basic academic skills,problem solving, creative and critical thinking, and social and emotional growth. Each year, Renton School District students qualify as National Merit Finalists while the total value of college scholarships earned is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Elementary level students are well-grounded in science through participation in the Hands-on Science Kit Program, lauded by the National Science Teachers' Association. At the high school level, the district's challenging chemistry program, which provides options for advanced placement college credit, has been recognized by the National Science Association, as well as the National Science Foundation. The focus in math is on intensive instruction in the basic skills, supplemented by opportunities to apply developing knowledge to real world problems. The K-12 math program increases student achievement through problem solving, integration of technology, and a rigorous assessment component. Students from elementary to high school levels regularly excel Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx a in regional and national mathematics contests. Across all levels and subjects, reading with accuracy and understanding is a primary goal. Elementary students receive a rich exposure to fine literature. Middle and high school students work extensively on reading in the content areas and exploring classic and modern literature works. Reading activities are integrated with a topnotch writing program beginning in kindergarten that provides students with intensive and focused practice for the proficiency in a wide range of language arts skills from creative to business and technical writing. A variety of classes, clubs, and programs give students opportunities to expand their educational horizons and pursue special interests. Choices range from instrumental and music, performing and visual arts, intramurals and athletics, academic-focused and career clubs, and community service opportunities to leadership development programs, business internships,job shadowing, and participation in the annual robotics competition. Special needs students with physical, emotional, and academic disabilities receive individualized attention from skilled teachers. Special education and remedial support are also available and children who are just learning English receive intensive, small-group ESL instruction to supplement their regular classroom learning. Guidance and counseling services are available for primary, middle, and high school students. Intellectually gifted children have many opportunities for extended learning. Operating at two magnet elementary schools and the three middle schools, the Discovery Program offers a challenging curriculum with a special focus on higher level thinking skills. High school students can take advantage of a full range of honors and advanced placement classes. Renton School District staff consistently show a commitment to their most important task- preparing their students for success in work and life. More than 80 percent of certificated staff have five or more years of higher education, and two of every three teachers have advanced degrees in their fields. Several of the district's certificated and classified staff have received the Washington Award for Educational Excellence. Individual teachers have received special honors such as the Christa McAuliffe Award for Excellence in Education, the Outstanding Secondary Science Award, the Washington State High School Social Studies Teacher of the Year Award, and Outstanding College Alumni recognition. Teachers are encouraged to take an active role in promoting their own professional growth through creating and refining curriculum, sharing successful strategies, and looking for new ways to assess student progress. This focus on continuous staff development enables teachers to consistently improve the quality of instruction and prepares them to help students meet rigorous state academic standards. Hundreds of training opportunities are offered to teachers and other staff members each year, ranging from CPR and first aid, technology education, diversity, and crisis intervention to math, science, and reading instruction strategies, assessment techniques, and arts education. II. ENROLLMENT TRENDS Over the past few years, District enrollment has continued to decline, consistent with much of the region. There have been some net gains in specific areas, but overall, the region is still experiencing declines in enrollment. While enrollment decline in some areas may still be due to the pandemic, we continue to monitor lower growth rate of immigrant population and increases in homebased instruction. Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx S The district will continue to monitor trends, but there are significant conditions that may speak to the potential for enrollment growth in the future. The number of new housing units currently under construction and expected to be completed in the next 2-3 years is larger than what has been experienced in the last decade. While interest rates have held steady, housing prices are increasing in some areas due to a lack of inventory. We are monitoring the effect of this on new home buyers and if new construction will continue the next few years. Discussion continues whether enrollment will return to pre-pandemic levels and if so, when. The early learning model in most cases had been through remote delivery methods and returned to partial in-person learning in 2020-2021. The district returned to in-person learning in the 2021- 2022 school year, with families still having an option for a virtual program—but it was not highly utilized. Still, the District will not fully understand the ongoing impact of instructional delivery, the current housing market, fuel increases, among others until further into the next couple of school years. Approval by the community of a 2019 bond measure allowed the district to construct a new elementary school (#16)to accommodate over-enrollment in the K-5 grade span and to provide some elementary capacity relief. Sartori, another new elementary was opened in 2018 as a choice school in the downtown area. Considering the decline in enrollment and the effect of the pandemic, the district chose to supplement the 2020 CFP by further evaluating the enrollment and capacity of the elementary schools located within or near the service areas the new elementary school #16. The conclusion of that analysis reaffirmed the district need for the new elementary school. #16, named Hilltop Heritage Elementary School—opened fall of 2023. The Renton School District community also supported a$676 M bond in November of 2022. This bond includes fund for continued building security system upgrades, seismic upgrades, building systems upgrades, and for property acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School. Property acquisition is currently in process and the project is in early design stages. There is growth related capacity planned for this project, however it will be reviewed more closely as it gets closer to construction and with more up to date projections. III. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted b the district that p Y identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (considering the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule,types of facilities and other factors identified by the district to be beneficial in supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major determining factor, together with the number of classrooms (teaching stations), in calculating facility capacity. The district has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through 8 in middle schools, and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school-year calendar adopted by the Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.doex i i District is also traditional; typically beginning in late August and ending in mid-June. Similarly, the District maintains a common daily schedule, with classes beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., depending on grade level. The district, and the Renton Education Association, recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following targets in student/teacher ratios: Grade Levels K-1 21:1 Grade Level 2 22:1 Grade Level 3 24:1 Grade Levels 4-12 29:1 The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science, Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios apply as follows: Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 Middle School PE 35:1 High School PE 40:1 All other classes 31:1 For the purposes of this report, student/teacher ratio for special education classes held in self- contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. In response to new State and District high school graduation requirements, beginning with the 2018-2019 school year, all District high schools changed from a semester system to a trimester system, resulting in the following: • Three 12-week terms instead of two 18-week terms, • Five 72-minute periods per day instead of six 57-minute periods, and • Reduction of classroom efficiency from 83%to 80%, reducing facility capacity. Beginning with the graduating class of 2020-2021, high school graduation requirements require one additional credit of science (three instead of two), and a total of twenty-four credits; three more than the previously required 21. This has impacted high school capacity, especially regarding science classrooms, where additional classroom space suitable for the various sciences, or the renovation/upgrade of existing classrooms to accommodate the same, will be necessary. Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx i The construction of new science classroom addition at Lindbergh High is one such project included in last year's update. This was not a growth generated project. Therefore, this project costs were not included in the calculation of last year's impact fees or the current(2025) calculation of impact fees. Student/teacher ratios, referenced earlier, are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, since relocatable facilities do not allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the district, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and development driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. For those reasons, relocatable classrooms capacities are calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs. Program Capacity Model: The Program Capacity Model calculates building capacity based on limitations that existing facilities place on enrollment because of current educational program needs, operating policy, and contractual restrictions. This has been referred to as the Practical Capacity Model in the years past. It is sometimes also referred to School Program Capacity. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each classroom/teaching station in each facility. For every room housing student, a calculation is made, assigning a maximum number of students per room. Sometimes the capacity of core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gym, or the quantity of restroom fixtures, may limit facility capacity to a level below that calculated by collective classroom capacity levels. This has generally been reviewed at each school level, giving each school leadership team the ability to utilize classrooms in the most efficient manner possible, considering their current enrollment. If enrollment begins to grow more rapidly in the near future, the district may begin to evaluate and report program capacity more specifically and show the impact on overall capacity. For example, if the school enrollment has a higher number of special ed students each year,then there is potential for another full classroom/teaching station to be taken out of capacity inventory,thereby reducing the overall school capacity for that given year. Given that we entered into a year with boundary adjustments to accommodate the opening of the new elementary school (Hilltop Heritage ES), the 2024 CFP could be considered to be a more appropriate year to provide further analysis of enrollment at each school, overall capacity, and program (practical)capacity. However due to continued enrollment decline,the district is not providing a detailed analysis between building capacity and program capacity currently. Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by class scheduling restrictions and student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical middle school six-period day, where one period is designated for teacher planning, capacity is reduced by one-sixth, or 17 percent, of theoretical capacity. Similarly, at high schools, with the newly established five-period day, capacity is reduced by one-fifth, or 20 percent. Elective classes, many of which require specialized classrooms, also figure into the equation for determining a school's capacity, which together with required classes, require a well thought out Master Schedule if the facility's capacity is to be maximized. Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad WABoard Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.doex s Current Capacity: Overall building (student) capacity of existing, permanent K-12 facilities, excluding special education facilities and facilities housing alternative learning environments, is now 15,438 with the opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School fall of 2023. As mentioned above, the district may begin to review each school in future years, if growth requires a more detailed comparison between building capacity and program capacity at each school, and/or at each grade span. Based on prior enrollment the district has shown a capacity deficit in the 6-8 grade span in the out years; as well as continued,yet smaller deficit in the K-5 grade span. That deficit has transitioned to a capacity surplus with recent enrollment decline but also shows more of a surplus now due to the recent opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School The opening of the new school this last fall did allow for relief at the over-crowded schools. It also allowed the district to intentionally have a lower enrollment at a couple of schools where some building improvements are needed before large new developments finish construction and begin to generate students in the area. We continue to note also that current and future capacity at the elementary level, as documented in this report, is based on the district's current Standard of Service, and does not necessarily reflect aspirational K-3 student/teacher ratios of seventeen students to one teacher. The district continues to make progress towards these requirements, by utilizing available classroom space, added staffing and plans to utilize the new elementary school classrooms to work towards this ratio. Most recent ratios have been anywhere from 17.3 to 19:1 but staffing during covid has slowed the districts progress. Elementary school capacity has been the district's greatest challenge. Relying heavily on the use of relocatable classrooms (portables)to accommodate the fluctuating student population, portables at elementary schools account for over 15%of the district's total K— 5 facility capacity. Portables are not considered permanent structures and are therefore not included in the inventory of permanent facilities. They are viewed as a short-term solution for managing enrollment fluctuation, housing students on a temporary or interim basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. Even with the opening of Hilltop Heritage Elementary School in fall of 2023, the district is not yet able to greatly reduce the number of temporary portable facilities. Renton School District's capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (interim or portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12 (traditional elementary, middle, and high school configurations), Special Instructional Use, or Non-instructional Support Facilities. The district's permanent K-12 facilities include 16 elementary schools, four middle schools, and four high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the district's early childhood, special education, and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include the Kohlwes Education Center(admin.), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center,Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium, and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,595,263 square feet,with 2,417,847 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 0 The district's relocatable K-12 facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on an interim or temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of the fifty-five relocatable facilities in the district's inventory, forty-four are "double portables" containing two classrooms, and eleven are singles. Combined, they provide the district with a total of ninety-nine relocatable classrooms, encompassing 88,704 square feet of additional space available for instruction. The tables below summarize existing K-12 facility capacity. A complete inventory of District facilities, including undeveloped property follows. Facility capacity worksheets may be found in the appendices. EXISTING FACILITY CAPACITY FACILITY TYPE ELEMENTARY MIDDLE SCHOOLS SCHOOLS HIGH SCHOOLS TOTAL PERMANENT 7,545 85.77% 3,435 88.25% 4,458 97.97% 15,438 89.55% RELOCATABLE 1,252 14.23% 457 11.75% 1 92 2.03% 1,801 10.450/( TOTAL 8,797 100.00% 3,892 100.00% 1 4,550 100.00% 1 17,239 100.00% INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF RELOCATEABLE CLASSROOMS Building ID Location Number of School ID Area Student Classrooms Numbers (sq. ft.) Capacity 53 McKnight Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 54 Nelsen Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 55 Nelsen Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 56 Nelsen Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 57 Nelsen Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 59 Lindbergh High 1 2 896 21 60 Lindbergh High 1 3 896 21 61 Lindbergh High 1 4 896 21 62 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 2 896 29 64 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 1 896 29 65 Dimmitt Middle 1 3 896 23 66 Dimmitt Middle 1 4 896 23 69 Honey Dew Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 70 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 3 896 29 72 McKnight Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 73 Lakeridge Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 74 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 1 58 77 McKnight Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 1n 78 McKnight Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 79 Dimmitt Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 80 Honey Dew Elementary 2 2A/213 1,792 58 81 Cascade Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 82 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 83 Lindbergh High 2 5/6 1,792 42 84 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 85 Dimmitt Middle 1 5 896 23 86 Dimmitt Middle 1 6 896 23 87 Dimmitt Middle 1 7 896 23 88 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 89 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 90 Honey Dew Elementary 2 4A/413 1,792 58 91 Honey Dew Elementary 2 lA/1B 1,792 58 92 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 93 Spring Glen 2 1/3 1,792 46 94 Spring Glen 2 2/4 1,792 46 95 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 96 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 lA/1B 1,792 58 97 Cascade Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 98 Cascade Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 99 Lakeridge Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 100 Lakeridge Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 101 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 3A/313 1,792 58 102 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 4AAB 1,792 58 103 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 104 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 105 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 106 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 107 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 108 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 109 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 110 Hazelwood Elementary 2 lA/113 1,792 58 111 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 9/10 1,792 58 112 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 11/12 1,792 58 113 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 lA/1B 1,792 58 114 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 2A/213 1,792 58 Total 99 1 1 88,704 2,669 *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.dor-x �� I INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF PERMANENT FACILITIES NAME LOCATION AREA ftz DESIGN CAPACITY Benson Hill 18665 -116th Ave.SE, Renton,98058 67,533 520 Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St.,Seattle,98178 49,157 338 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St.,Seattle,98178 57,072 332 Cascade 16022-116th Ave.SE, Renton,98058 59,164 467 p Hazelwood 7100- 116th Ave.SE, Newcastle,98056 66,161 591 = Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton,98056 60,000 547 Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton,98059 54,620 336 aKennydale 1700 NE 28th St., Renton,98056 65,169 622 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St.,Seattle,98178 52,958 398 z Uj Maplewood Heights. 130 Jericho Ave., Renton,98059 56,220 402 W Renton Park 16828-128th Ave.SE, Renton,98058 65,955 476 Sartori 332 Park Ave. N, Renton,98057 76,797 554 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton,98058 53,992 472 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton,98055 57,844 460 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton,98058 58,758 380 Hilltop Heritage 1075 Duvall Ave NE 98059 77,000 650 Total Grades K-5 Capacity 978,400 7,545 Dimmitt 12320-80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 109,070 794 Lu McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 126,706 847 0 o Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 124,234 896 00 Risdon 6928- 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 136,582 898 Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 496,592 3,435 Cn Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 327,395 1,462 o Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 242,662 1,211 Renton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, 98057 278,373 1,389 = Talley 7800 S 132nd St., Renton, 98178 70,831 397 c� x Total Grades 9.11 Capacity 919,261 4,458 TOTAL GRADE LEVELS K-12 2,394,253 15,438 Meadow Crest EEC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, 98056 68,752 464 z HOME Program-Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 7,005 84 z a Renton Academy-Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 24,837 48 W J a Total Instructional Special Use 100,594 596 Total Instructional Facilities 2,494,847 16,034 ov Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 21,894 0.a > Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, 98057 57,000 vim, vWi Lindbergh Pool 16740- 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 13,600 Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad WABoard Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx Nutrition Services/ Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton 98057 27,466 Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, 98057 37,213 Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 20,243 Total Support Services 177,416 Total All Permanent Facilities 2,672,263 RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SCHOOL* ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle,98178 88, 89, 109 5,376 174 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 95,96, 101, 102 7,168 232 Cascade 16022- 116th Ave. SE, Renton,98058 81,97, 98 5,376 174 Hazelwood 7100- 116th Ave. SE,Newcastle, 98056 110 1,792 1 58 Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton,98059 69. 80. 90. 91 7,168 232 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, 98178 73,99, 100 5,376 174 84, 103, 104, 105, Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave., Renton,98059 111, 112 10,752 348 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave.NE, Renton,98058 74, 82, 106, 107 7,168 232 62,64, 70, 113, Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 114 6,272 203 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 92, 108 3,584 1 116 Elementary School Total Capacity 60,032 1943 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity 65, 66, 79, 85, 86, Dimmitt 12320- 80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 87 6,272 161 McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 184 Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton,98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 184 Middle School Total 20,608 529 HIGH SCHOOLS Area Location Address Building ID (sq.ft.) Capacity Lindbergh 16426- 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59,60, 61, 83 4,480 105 High School Total 4,480 105 Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad WABoard Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx iz INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIAL USE Area Location Address Building ID (sq.ft.) Capacity 2607 Jones Ave. S, Spring Glen Renton,98055 93, 94 3,584 92 Special Education Total 3,584 92 TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE 88,704 2669 CLASSROOMS *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Skyway Site S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S, Seattle 4.18 Acres IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Projection Methodology: Numerous methodologies are available for projecting long-term enrollments. The most common method is known as cohort survival which tracks groups of students through the system and adjusts the populations to account for the average year-to-year growth. For example, this year's fourth grade is adjusted based on the average enrollment trend of the past in order to estimate next year's fifth grade enrollment. This calculation method considers the past five years' trends to determine the average adjustment factor for each grade, or cohort. The method works well for all grades except kindergarten, where there is no previous year data. For kindergarten, two methodologies are generally used: A linear extrapolation from the previous five years of kindergarten enrollment, assuming that there is a trend; or, alternatively, a comparison of the kindergarten enrollment to births from five years prior can be used to calculate a"birth-to-k" ratio. For example, kindergarten enrollment in 2019 is divided by the total births in King County in 2014 to produce a birth-to-k ratio. The average ratio for the last five years can then be applied to births in subsequent years to estimate kindergarten enrollment. The cohort survival method has been used by OSPI to predict enrollments for all Districts in the state. In past years, OSPI has used a 6-year cohort average for grades 1-12 and a linear extrapolation method at kindergarten. In 2008, OSPI commissioned a study to evaluate the effectiveness of this method for predicting enrollment. The report recommended the use of the "birth-to-k"method for predicting kindergarten enrollment and the use of a housing adjustment factor for Districts that are likely to be impacted by large numbers of new housing developments. The cohort survival method generally works well for Districts that have a consistent trend of gradual increases or declines in enrollment. It is less reliable in Districts where spikes in demographic trends (especially a marked increase or decrease in new housing) can lead to dramatic swings in enrollment from one year to the next. In addition, the use of the linear Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx is extrapolation method at the kindergarten level can result in a distorted trend since it does not consider changes in birth rate trends. Combining cohort survival with other information about births, housing, regional population trends, and even trends in service area and private school enrollment can sometimes provide for a more accurate forecast. For this Plan,the average rollup at existing grades was combined with estimates of growth that might be expected from new housing, and assumptions about market share gains or losses that the district is likely to see at certain grade levels. Estimates of housing growth for this model were obtained from building permit information provided by the respective jurisdictions. However,there are many unknowns due to the overall market pause in real estate, rising gas prices, inflation, and some still consider the pandemic to be of concern. The districts response to this was to consider three projections: a low, medium, and high. Due to inflation and rising interest rates, real estate prices were leveling off, decreasing in some neighborhoods, but more recently housing prices have been increasing due to a lack of inventory. With families who purchased their homes during record low interest rates, many are opting to stay put rather than risk higher payments due to larger interest rates. Overall,this has caused a tightening of inventory and has been causing prices to increase and competitive offers over and above list rates. It is too soon to expand on the relative prices seen in Renton as compared to outlying and more expensive suburban areas. We could still experience a higher-than-expected growth rate, but do not expect that until a few years out. Because the District needs to be as prepared as possible for a higher growth rate, we are monitoring all three scenarios. There is more potential for growth in the K-5 and high school grade span in the outyears and some decline is anticipated in the 6-8 grade span. Projections and Future Capacity: Enrollment 2023 projections provided by Educational Data Solutions, LLC indicate continued decline in the elementary grade span over the next couple of years, with a minor decrease in middle school and high school enrollment at varied years, but overall, a relatively flat rate in the big picture. Using the high-level growth chart, overall enrollment in the out-years is projected to grow by about six hundred students spread over all three grades spans, but still does not project we are back to pre-pandemic enrollment levels until after October 2028. The district will continue to monitor development, move-in/move-outs, and trends within the four-county area to better predict enrollment more than two years out. For the 2024 CFP,the district opted to continue use of the 2023 projections provided by Educational Data Solutions, LLC due to the reported region flat growth that is continuing. An updated analysis will likely be used for the 2025 CFP. As the District continues to move past the pandemic and related impacts, there is potential for development growth in the real estate market and potential for a resurgence of immigrant population. The local jurisdiction is still planning on over 5,000 new residential units in various areas over the next 2-10 years. Much of that development construction is nearing completion in the Sierra Heights Elementary school feeder area. It is the district's responsibility to monitor these projects, the timing and how the district will be able to respond with appropriate capacity to accommodate instructional delivery. The number of new homes planned for future construction in the District continues to be higher i than the number of permitted units that were built between 2017 and 2021.This may suggest that Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.doer enrollment losses could be lower in the near terms but could see net gains in the out-years due to growth from new housing. (see past and future housing development in the appendices) Projections show a near term flat growth rate but do project an increase in middle school enrollment over the next six years of 381 students, when considering high growth projections. There are currently no plans to increase middle school capacity, as even with a slight growth, enrollment would still not be back to pre-pandemic levels. Using the same high projection at the high school level,projected enrollment over the next six years will add an additional 290 students. If these projections hold in the near term, this growth could coincide with district plans to replace Renton High School. As part of the voter approved November 2022 bond, funds are provided for both land acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School. The District is currently in the process of acquiring 43 parcels north of the existing Renton High School and is in early planning and design. Groundbreaking is estimated to be in spring of 2027 for a planned opening in fall of 2029. Renton High School enrollment has held steady between 1000 and 1200 students over the past six years and current enrollment exceeds pre-pandemic enrollment by 35 students. With a planned opening in fall of 2029, current elementary grade span students will be entering high school, with larger current enrollment numbers in the 4th and 5th grade, consistent with pre-pandemic enrollment levels. The new Renton High School is designing for an increase in capacity to accommodate enrollment growth, which will allow for 1800 students. PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH ACTUAL OCT. ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL OCT. OCT. 2029/30 CHANGE CHANGE(%) PROJECTED PERCENTAGE 2022/2023 PROJECTED CHANGE CHANGE HEADCOUNT HEADCOUNT HEADCOUNT 2023/24- 2023/24- 2023-2029 2023-2029 HEADCOUNT (high) 2023/24 2023/24 ELEMENTARY 6,657 6,550 7,225 (107.00) (1.61%) 675 10.31% MIDDLE 3,208 3,094 3,475 (114.00) (3.55%) 381 12.31% HIGH 4,337 4,304 4,594 (33) (0.76%) 290 6.74% other/alt 181 177 194 8 - 16 - TOTAL 14,383 14,125 15,294 (258.00) (1.81%) 1169.00 8.28% V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS With the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in August 2018, the 2017 elementary deficit capacity of 1,244 was dramatically reduced by nearly 40%to 755. With the passage of the 2019 Bond Measure, approved by the voters in November 2019, the District opened its sixteenth elementary school, located in the Hazen High School service area, where the district has experienced the most recent growth in the past decade plus. Hilltop Heritage Elementary School opened for the 2023/2024 school year. Opening this new school did help to balance out enrollment vs. capacity this past school year and provided an overall increase in capacity for the Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx i elementary grade span. Projections used for the 2023 UP showed growth in this grade span by over 400 students in the out years. Because the district opted to use last year's set of low, medium, and high projects, the district is still preparing for this projection in the out years and will take a closer look in the 2025 CFP. At the middle school level, decreased enrollment combined with lower projections show that the district will continue to have a small surplus in the next year. We will continue to monitor, but there are currently no enrollment or growth driven capital facilities projects in the planning stages for middle schools. However,there is discussion for future bond planning,the need to replace both Nelson Middle School and Dimmitt Middle School. Those projects would be reviewed in future bond planning discussions and enrollment growth and projections would be considered at that time. As previously mentioned,the 2022 voter-approved bond allows the district to acquire property and plan for the replacement of Renton High School. This will be both an opportunity to add program capacity to address anticipated and projected growth in the out years, but to also ensure program equity across the high school grade space. The district desires to ensure educational space and opportunity is provided and comparable to what is offered at both Hazen and Lindbergh High Schools. In addition to any discussion around projected permanent facility deficits at the elementary and high school levels, it should be noted that the District is also reaching its maximum limit in providing portable classrooms at its existing sites due to current land use and building code requirements. Although not included in the calculation of potential Impact Fees,the implementation of new relocatable classrooms and/or the relocation of existing ones, remains a viable method of addressing both growth and the shifting of student population, for the short term. Similarly, science classroom additions proposed for Lindbergh High School, as well as other potential high school renovations, additions, or relocations responding to enrollment growth and/or changes in capacity methodology, are not included in the calculation of these fees. Those current projects are more related to program needs and existing enrollment. We have not considered these projects to be added capacity at the high school grade span. The next table compares the current permanent capacity of Renton School District facilities to current and projected enrollment for the next six years. As noted earlier, the district may take a closer look at overall permanent capacity compared to practical or program capacity in future CFPs, if enrollment begins to recover in a more rapid fashion. Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.doax 17 SURPLUS/DEFICIT CAPACITY PROJECTIONS' 2024/25 -2029/30 *23/24 1 24/25 **PERMANENT CAPACITY 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 ELEM. K-5 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 6,550 6,488 6,636 6,697 7,040 7,142 7,225 SURPLUS/(DEFICIT CAPACITY 995 1,057 909 848 505 403 320 MIDDLE **PERMANENT CAPACITY 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 6-8 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 3,094 3,138 3,276 3,285 3,417 3,407 3,475 SURPLUS/(DEFICIT CAPACITY 341 297 159 150 18 28 (40) HIGH **PERMANENT CAPACITY 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,669 9-12 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 4,304 4,381 4,386 4,266 4,482 4,537 4,594 SURPLUS/(DEFICIT CAPACITY) 154 77 72 192 (24) (79)1 75 1. Does not include relocatable facilities(portables) "current enrollment LOW range projection - 24/25 MEDIUM range projection -25/26&26/27 age projection -27/28 and beyond **permanent capacity will be EVALUATED to program capacity in CFP 2025 or later Capital Construction Plan: For the last six-year period, the district's highest priorities have been to address existing and projected facility capacity deficits, aging infrastructure at secondary schools, and responding to/planning for both growth and program related added capacity. These projects funded by the 2019 bond and impact fees, are projects responding to growth. This has included: • Completion of Hilltop Heritage Elementary school - most of the growth has occurred and relief is needed at some schools in the Hazen High School service area-in the elementary grade-span. • High school additions and/or renovations to create additional science classroom/laboratory space to address changes in State graduation requirements. • Planning for replacement of Renton High School, Dimmitt Middle School and/or Nelson Middle School-all aging facilities and potentially impacted by growth. • Acquisition of land for future development • Addition and or relocation of relocatable classrooms (interim classroom space known as portables) During the next six years, the district's voter approved bond on the Nov. 8, 2022, election ballot will allow the district to stay on track to make major renovations, replacements, and upgrades to keep our schools in top operating condition, while protecting taxpayer investments in our buildings and helping maintain high property values. Currently, these may not be growth generated project, but are evaluated every year. These include: Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx iQ i Safety & Security • Interior door hardware/lock updates • New key system • Main entry video intercoms • Entryway improvements to provide front door line-of-sight for office staff. • Update seismic and structural systems in older buildings (retrofitting and modification of existing structures to make them more resistant to seismic activity, ground motion, or soil failure) • Improvements and equipment replacement of school Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems • Upgrades to electrical,plumbing, and mechanical systems • Upgrades to boilers and domestic hot water heaters • Provide for up to forty acres for a Renton High School replacement. • Build a new high school facility for the Renton High School service area,providing a modern learning environment and equitable athletic opportunities for all students. The District's intent in structuring its capital improvement program is to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period to optimize the utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house project management(Capital Projects Office) and outside management consultants to accomplish this. VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Finance Plan: The primary funding sources for all capital construction projects scheduled over the next six years include 2022 Bond funds, remaining funds from the 2022 capital levy; and school impact fees currently collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue,Newcastle, and Renton throughout 2024, as growth projects that addressed past capacity deficits are completed. Growth driven projects funded by past collected impact fees and 2019 bond funds are nearing completion. The majority of those recent bond funds will be directed towards land acquisition and the replacement of Renton High School, as previously described. Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx io 0 While there could be placement of temporary facilities or portables due to growth over the next six years at various locations, depending upon enrollment growth-the district will evaluate if the replacement of the high school will need to increase capacity due to growth. Construction of this school will not begin for 2-3 years, due to the need for land acquisition. If enrollment and projections show additional capacity is needed to accommodate growth, we will evaluate the collection of impact fees at that time. Enrollment driven projects represent only a portion of the district's total capital improvement plan. Estimated expenditures for enrollment driven projects over the duration of this six-year plan are indicated below. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN -GROWTH DRIVEN PROJECTS Project Estimated Expenditures'($1,000,000's) Funding ($1,000,000's) *2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Secured2 Unsecured3 New Elem.School 60 6 2 68 60 8 Science Classroom 15 5 5 25 25 Land Acquisition 2 6 $ 7 1 portables 1 1 1 10 10 3 Total 78 18 1 0 10 0 101 102 12 1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost,including hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2019 bond monies,and previously collected school impact fees. 3. Unsecured funds include future school impact fees and potential bond initiatives. *2022-23 and prior II. IMPACT FEES Impact Fees: Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621, resulting in a decrease in impact fees for single-family of$1158.00 per unit—now set at $1003.00, and a decrease in impact fees for multi-family of$989.00 per unit—now set at $3268.00 Student generation factors used last year are also being used this year. Calculations in 2022 included increased construction costs, and while costs have continued to increase,the district did not add additional construction costs into the calculation for 2023 impact fees or for 2024 calculations. Future CFP's will review enrollment,projections, and projected growth to determine if any growth-related projects are needed to address potential capacity deficits moving forward in any of the grade spans. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as a means of supplementing the funding of additional public facilities necessitated by enrollment growth from new development. In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential new development. To determine an equitable school impact fee throughout unincorporated King Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 7n County, King County Code 2 1 A was adopted, establishing an impact fee formula that has in turn been adopted by the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton, in their respective enabling ordinances. The formula requires that school districts establish "Student Generation Factors" that estimate the number of students generated by each new single or multi-family residential unit constructed and establish district-specific construction costs that are unique to that district. Refer to appendices for substantiating documentation on Student Generation Factors. Other factors influencing impact fees include: Site Acquisition Costs - the estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Acquisition Cost-the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the district. Temporary Facility Cost - the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom, including site work and utilities. State Funding Assistance Credit- the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. Tax Credit—Driven by assessed property values, taxation rate, and Bond interest rates effective effective IMPACT FEES January January CHANGE 2024 2025 SINGLE-FAMILY $2,161 $1,003 $1,158 MULTI-FAMILY $4,257 $3,268 $989 Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 01 II. APPENDICES Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx Seattle F{nlis— HES— > a ,i Renton School District Map Legend Abbreviations Elsrnenbey R Pro K Schools: Secondary Schools: -Bellevue - Renton BHE Bonew Hill Momentary OPAS Olrnrnitt Middle Sdnd BME Bryn Mawr Elernsrdary HHS Hazen High School CES Cascade EJarnentary LHS LFKber¢r Hid,School ® E Campbell •l Me MMS MdsNgM MiddleSchool Kent SeataC HOE Honeydew NMS Nelson triddhe School HES Hozhm+od Elornentary RHS Renton High School HLE Highlands Elementary WAS Madan Middle School KDE Kennydaie Momentary THS Tilley High School King County Tukwila LRE LalaridgeElementary MEc Maedowcreat Early Leaning City Limits MH �le'o"te Ejorneritary Newcastle RAS Of Renton RIDE Ranbn Park Momentary SAE Sartori Dernan ary KC UG SHE Stems Haight Elornentary THE Boundary TPE lAl6u4 Per lernontary Ekwnente ry RSD BOUNDARY MAP - MUNICIPALITY OVERLAY Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Grades K-1 201 Grade 2 221 Grade 3 24:1 Grades 4-5 291 Scheduling Efficiciency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 SCHOOL PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTAL TOTAL K-1 2 3 4.5 SPED OTHER CAP TOTAL K-1 2 3 4.5 SPED OTHERI CAP CAP BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 BRYN MAM 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 HONEYDEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 26 11 5 2 1 0 2 6 402 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 SARTORI 32 8 4 4 6 3 7 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554 SIERRA HGTS. 29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 HILLTOP HERITIAGE 32 6 4 4 6 4 8 650 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 650 TOTAL 430 115 52 50 69 36 124 7,545 65 0 0 13 32 1 19 1,252 8,797 TABLE 11 LINDBERGH SERVICE PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTAL AREA TOTAL K-1 1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP TOTAL K-1 2 3 4.5 SPED OTHER CAP CAP BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 TOTAL 122 30 13 9 21 11 38 1,843 10 0 0 4 3 0 3 183 2,026 HAZEN PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTAL SERVICEAREA TOTAL K-1 1 2 3 4.5 SPED OTHER CAP TOTAL K-1 2 3 4.5 SPED OTHER CAP CAP HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HONEYDEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 SIERRA HGTS. 29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TOTAL 110 27 16 14 12 8 25 1,832 28 0 0 4 18 0 6 618 2,450 RENTON HIGH PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS TOTAL SERVICE AREA TOTAL K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP TOTAL K-1 2 3 4-5 SPED OTHER CAP CAP BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TOTAL 109 28 12 14 17 7 31 1,737 19 0 0 5 6 1 7 306 2,043 Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W.•\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx ')a MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS:Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 PE 35:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 Scheduling Efficiciency 0.83 Program Efficiency 0.95 PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLES ITOTAL SCHOOL TOTAL CORE PE BAND CHOIR SPED OTHER SUPP CAP TOTAL CORE SPED SUPP CAP CAP DIMMIT 41 21 3 1 1 4 5 6 794 4 4 0 0 91 885 McKNIGHT 41 25 3 1 1 4 5 2 847 8 8 0 0 183 1,030 NELSEN 52 22 3 1 1 2 9 14 896 8 8 0 0 183 1,079 RISDON 47 24 3 2 1 7 4 6 898 0 0 0 0 0 898 TOTAL 1 181 1 92 1 12 5 1 4 1 17 1 23 1 28 1 3,435 20 1 20 0 1 0 457 3,892 TABLE 12A HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS:Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 (24:1 @ Talley) PE 40:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 (24:1 @ Talley) Scheduling Efficiciency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.90 PERMANENT TEACHING STATIONS RELOCATABLES TOTAL SCHOOL TOTAL CORE PE BAND CHOIR SPED OTHER SUPP CAP TOTAL CORE I SPED SUPPI CAP CAP HAZEN 78 44 3 2 1 7 18 3 1,462 0 0 0 0 0 1,462 LINDBERGII 55 32 3 1 1 6 11 1 1,211 5 4 1 0 92 1,303 RENTON 68 34 3 1 1 7 16 6 1,389 0 0 0 0 0 1,389 TALLEY 1 24 13 1 0 0 1 6 3 397 0 0 0 0 0 397 TOTAL 1 225 1 123 1 10 1 4 1 3 1 21 1 51 1 13 1 4,458 1 5 4 1 0 92 4,550 Prepared by:T.Brewer-Rogstad W..\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx STUDENT GENERATION RATES (SGR) The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, requires that school districts provide "student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation." The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, "data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county-wide averages must be used." In years past, the district used average SGR'S from nearby districts. Starting with the 2021 CFP, the district began using its own SGR derived from residential projects with the district. The district used those SGR's again for the 2022 CFP - due to paused construction and covid impacts on enrollment. Student generation rates were updated in 2023 and are also being used for 2024 calculations. There was not a significant difference in student generation rates from 2021 generated rates. The multi-family rate is higher at 28 per one hundred vs. 24 per one hundred. This slightly higher rate is likely due to presence of more low-income units and units with multiple bedrooms. STUDENT GENERATION RATES Elementary Middle School High School (K-5) (6-8) (9-12) Total SINGLE-FAMILY 0.146 0.046 0.089 0.281 MULTI-FAMILY 0.146 0.065 0.069 0.280 Renton School District AparMnVOupiex Bedroom Counts and SGR Breakout Pernik Years 2017.2021 4.,27123 Project Name StAo I Bed 2 Bed 3 Bed 4 Bed 5 Bed Units Students SGR 0 28 29 ! 17 0 0 74 24 0.324 _ 0 — 0 1 0 4 0 . w 0_ 4 ©_ � 0.000 0 0 ! 0 2 0 0 2 0 O Ooo z _ _ __ __.._ 0 23 20 5 0 .. 0_ _ — 48 13w 0.271 ilaitlauirt# 0 50 36 i 15 0 0 101 11 0.109 ureratCourtAplabaRnrs" 0 9 13 18 0 0 50 43 0.860 r . _..._ .n„. ,— ilpl rltnarik�' 5 43 t 2 0 0 0 80 ( 7 � 0.117 rfm�mkd+ Tob-3 S 1S3 111! fli 0 3 0 S39 98 0.289 The student generation rate varies among apartment developments, based on whether the units are for low-income residents and based on the number of bedrooms in each unit. These differences can help the district when planning for future growth from housing. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 26 Student Generation Rates by Grade Level and Housing Type GradePermit Type Permit Subtype Number of Units Generated K-5 45 0.133 Apartment& 339 6-8 25 0.074 Duplex' 9-12 28 0.083 MFR Subtype APT&DPLX Student SubtotaI4 98 0.289 K-5 2.5 0.179 Townhouse 140 6-8 6 0.043 �•— 9-12 5 0.036 TWN Student Subtotal 4 36 0.257 K-5 70 0.146 s 479 6-8 31 0.065 MFR Total New MFR 9-12 33 0.069 ALL MFR Student Subtotal-) 134 0.280 K-5 114 0.146 779 6-8 36 0.046 New SFR SFR 9-12 69 0.089 SFR Student Subtotal-> 219 0.281 SFR Totals4 219 0.281 Past and Future Housing Development 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Permitted Units 2017-2021 Units in the Pipeline MF 479 3209 ■SF 779 539 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 27 Renton Enrollment History Births 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Kingcowty 24,244 24,899 25,190 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,343 25,487 26,011 25,273 K Emil as% 5.29% 5,09% 5.23% 5.32% 5.14% 5.27% 5.01% 5.11% 4.98°% 4.30% 4.29% 4.34% Oct11 Oct12 Oct13 Oct14 Oct15 Oct16 Oct17 Oct18 Oct19 Oct20 Oct21 Oct22 K 1,283 1,267 1,317 1,333 1,261 1,297 1,255 1274 1,263 1,095 1,117 1097 1 1,193 1,284 1,310 1,345 1,396 1,271 1,300 1271 1,248 1,214 1,100 1124 2 1,184 1,220 1,234 1,327 1,355 1,368 1,259 1265 1,207 1,215 1,182 1098 3 1,130 1,131 1,199 1,253 1,296 1,314 1,350 1285 1,225 1,142 1,177 1163 4 11109 1,098 1,120 1,178 1,244 1,252 1,306 1330 1,256 1,186 1,106 1160 5 1,156 1,096 1,113 1,108 1,170 1,206 1,247 1314 1,286 1,205 1,138 1090 6 1,062 1,126 1,059 1,081 1,092 1,136 1,148 1199 1,246 1,234 1,137 1052 7 1,118 1,087 1,114 1,062 1,087 1,080 1,144 1144 1,175 1,251 1.156 1118 8 1,024 1,105 1,082 1,118 1,054 1,057 1,121 1108 1,125 1,163 1,219 1131 9 11255 1,148 1,130 1,124 1,131 1,057 1,104 1107 1,118 1,123 1,151 1199 10 1,083 1,144 1,075 1,134 1,119 1,158 1,081 1106 1,133 1,110 1,130 1164 11 987 960 1,029 978 1,015 1,065 1,022 1107 960 992 984 1017 12 843 898 1,049 1,046 1,038 1045 1_,116 1034 931 981 998 968 Total 14,427 14,564 14,831 15,087 15,258 15,306 15,453 15 544 15 173 14 911 14,595 14,381 Change 194 137 267 256 171 48 147 91 -371 -262 -316 -214 %Change 1.4% 0.9% 1.8% 1.7% 1.1% 0.3% 1.0% 0.6% -2.4% -1.7% -2.1% -1.5% K-5 71055 7,096 7,293 7.544 7,722 7,708 7,717 7,739 7,485 7,057 6,820 6,732 6-8 3,204 3,318 3,255 3,261 3,233 3,273 3,413 3,451 3,546 3,648 3,512 3,301 9-12 4,168 4,150 4,283 4,282 4,303 4,325 4,323 4,354 4,142 4,206 4,263 4.348 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN finaLdocx 28 Low Range Projection Projected Births 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,428 23,583 23,973 24,428 24,632 24,899 25,178 4.31% 4.44% 4.65% 4.73% 4.73% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% Oct23 Oct24 Oct25 Oct26 Oct27 Oct28 Oct29 Oct30 Oct31 Oct32 K 1048 1068 1101 1108 1116 1139 1161 1171 1183 1197 1 1094 1057 1077 1109 1117 1124 1146 1168 1177 1190 2 1097 1080 1043 1063 1094 1102 1107 1128 1150 1159 3 1078 1090 1072 1036 1056 1086 1091 1096 1118 1139 4 1138 1067 1078 1061 1025 1044 1072 1077 1082 1103 5 1136 1126 1057 1067 1050 1015 1031 1058 1064 1069 6 1039 1093 1083 1018 1027 1011 977 993 1019 1024 7 1026 1024 1077 1067 1003 1012 997 963 979 1004 8 1100 1021 1019 1070 1061 998 1007 991 958 973 9 1126 1104 1025 1023 1074 1064 1006 1015 999 965 10 1193 1129 1106 1028 1026 1076 1056 998 1006 991 11 1055 1089 1031 1011 940 938 987 968 914 922 12 1014 1060 1094 1036 1016 945 946 995 976 922 Total 14,144 14,007 13,863 13,698 13,605 13,556 13,583 13,621 13,625 13,660 Change -237 -137 -144 -165 -93 49 27 38 4 34 % Change -1.7% -1.0% -1.0% -1.2% -0.7% -0.4% 0.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% K-5 6,591 6,488 6,428 6,445 6,458 6,511 6,608 6,699 6,774 6,857 6-8 3,165 3,138 3,179 3,155 3,091 3,022 2,981 2,948 2,956 3,002 9-12 4,388 4,381 4,256 4,098 4,055 4,024 3,994 3,975 3,896 3,801 Medium Range Projection (Recommended at this time) Projected Births 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,428 23,583 23,973 24,428 24,632 24,899 25,178 4.44% 4.53% 4.74% 4.83% 4.83% 4.85% 4.85% 4.85% 4.85% 4.85% Oct23 Oct24 Oct25 Oct26 Oct27 Oct28 Oct29 Oct30 Oct31 Oct32 K 1080 1090 1123 1131 1139 1163 1185 1194 1207 1221 1 1105 1101 1110 1143 1151 1159 1181 1204 1214 1227 2 1108 1102 1098 1107 1139 1147 1153 1175 1197 1207 3 1089 1112 1105 1101 1110 1142 1148 1153 1175 1198 4 1149 1089 1111 1104 1100 1109 1138 1144 1149 1172 5 1147 1148 1089 1111 1104 1100 1107 1136 1141 1147 6 1049 1115 1116 1060 1080 1074 1070 1077 1105 1110 7 1036 1045 1110 1111 1055 1075 1069 1065 1072 1100 8 1111 1042 1050 1114 1115 1060 1080 1074 1070 1076 9 1138 1126 1056 1065 1129 1130 1079 1100 1093 1089 10 1205 1152 1140 1070 1079 1143 1132 1081 1102 1095 11 1065 1111 1063 1052 988 996 1058 1049 1001 1020 12 1024 1081 1127 1079 1068 1004 1015 1078 1068 1020 Total 14,308 14,313 14,298 14,248 14,259 14,304 14,416 14,529 14,595 14,682 Change -73 5 -15 -51 11 45 112 113 66 87 % Change -0.5% 0.0% -0.1% -0.4% 0.1% 0.3% 0.8% 0.8% 0.5% 0.6% K-5 6,680 6,642 6,636 6,697 6,744 6,820 6,911 7,006 7,084 7,171 6-8 3,197 3,202 3,276 3,285 3,251 3,210 3,220 3,216 3,246 3,286 9-12 4,432 4,470 4,386 4,266 4,264 4,274 4,285 4,308 4,264 4,224 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 29 High Range Projection Projected Births 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 24.337 24,090 23,686 23,428 23,583 23,973 24,428 24,632 24,899 25,178 4.57% 4.62% 4.84% 4.92% 4.92% 4.95% 4.95% 4.95% 4.95% 4.95% Oct23 Oct24 Oct25 Oct26 Oct27 Oct28 Oct29 Oct30 Oct31 Oct32 K 1113 1112 1146 1154 1161 1186 1208 1218 1232 1245 1 1116 1145 1144 1178 1186 1194 1217 1240 1250 1264 2 1120 1124 1153 1152 1185 1194 1199 1222 1246 1256 3 1100 1134 1139 1168 1167 1200 1206 1212 1235 1259 4 1161 1111 1144 1149 1179 1178 1208 1214 1220 1244 5 1159 1172 1122 1156 1161 1191 1187 1217 1223 1229 6 1060 1138 1150 1103 1135 1140 1170 1166 1196 1202 7 1047 1066 1143 1156 1109 1142 1147 1176 1172 1203 8 1122 1062 1082 1159 1172 1125 1158 1163 1194 1189 9 1149 1149 1088 1108 1187 1200 1157 1191 1196 1227 10 1217 1175 1175 1114 1134 1213 1214 1171 1205 1210 11 1076 1133 1095 1095 1039 1057 1135 1135 1095 1127 12 1035 1103 1161 1122 1123 1066 1088 1168 1169 1127 Total 14,473 14,623 14,742 14,814 14,938 15,086 15,294 15,494 15,632 15,781 Change 92 150 119 71 124 148 208 200 137 149 % Change 0.6% 1.0% 0.8% 0.5% 0.8% 1.0% 1.4% 1.3% 0.9% 1.0% K-5 6,768 6,797 6,848 6,957 7,040 7,142 7,225 7,324 7,406 7,497 6-8 3,229 3,266 3,375 3,418 3,417 3,407 3,475 37505 3,562 3,593 9-12 4,476 4,560 4,519 4,439 4,482 4,537 4,594 4,665 4,664 4,690 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 30 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATION SITE ACQUISITION COST Facility Site Area Cost per Acre Facility SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY (Acres) Capacity SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 10 $ 650,000.00 650 0.146 $1,460 0.146 $1,460.00 Middle 0 650 850 0.046 $0 0.065 $0.00 High 0 650 1250 0.089 $0 0.069 $0.00 TOTAL $1,460 TOTAL $1,460 SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST Perm. % of Facility Cost Facility in in MULTI-FAMILY Facility Tot.Facilities 2022$ Ca ( ) Capacity y SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 85.77% 58.000,000 650 0.146 $11,174 0.146 $11,174 Middle 88.25% 0 850 0.046 $0 0.065 $0 High 97.97% 0 1,250 0.089 $0 0.069 $0 TOTAL $11,174 TOTAL $11,174 TEMPORARY FACILITY COST Perm.%of Facility Cost Facility SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY Facility Tot.Facilities 2022$ Ca ( ) Capacity y SGF COST SGF COST Elementary 14.23% 0 29 0.146 $0 0.146 $0 Middle 11.75% 0 26 0.046 $0 0.065 $0 High 2.03% 0 26 0.089 $0 0.069 $0 TOTAL $0 TOTAL $0 OSPISCAP Cost Alloc. Sq. Ft.per Assistance SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY Facility per Sq.Ft. Student Percentage 9 SGF COST SGF COST Elementary $ 375.00 90 0.3615 0.146 $1.781 0,146 $1,781 Middle $ 375.00 117 0.3133 0.046 $0 0.065 $0 High $ 375.00 130 0.3133 0.089 $0 0.069 $0 TOTAL $1,781 TOTAL $1,781 TAX CREDIT(TC)* SINGLE-FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY Average Assessed Value(AAV) $673,008 $328,428 Interest Rate for Bonds(i) 3.48% 3.48% Term(t=maximum 10 yrs.) 10 10 Tax Rate (r) 0.001579 0.001579 TC TOTAL TC TOTAL $8,847 $4,317 FACILITY CREDIT $0 $0 TOTAL FEE $2,005 $6,535 50% DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION 1,003 3.268 IMPACT FEE 1,003 3,268 TABLE11 TAX CREDIT(TC)=NPV(net present value)x AAV x r where NPV= AAV = Average assessed Value r= Tax Rate i= Bond Interest Rate as of 03/2024 t= Bond Term Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 31 CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN PERMANENT FACILITY CAPACITY (Students) 2022/23 2023/2024 CHANGE Elementary 6,895 7,545 650 Middle 3,435 3,435 0 High 4,458 4,458 0 Total 14,788 15,438 650 STUDENT ENROLLMENT(October Headcount) 2022/2023 2023/2024' CHANGE Elementary 6,732 6,550 182 Middle 3,301 3,094 207 High 4,348 4,481 133 Total 14,381 14,125 256 IMPACT FEES Jan 1, 2024 Jan 1, 2025 CHANGE Single-Family $ 2,161.00 $ 1,003.00 $ (1,158.00) Multi-Family $ 4,257.00 $ 3,268.00 $ 989.00 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS 2023 2024 CHANGE Single-Family Elementary 0.146 0.146 0.000 Middle 0.046 0.046 0.000 High 0.089 0.089 0.000 Total 0.281 0.281 0.000 Multi-Family Elementary 0.146 0.146 0.000 Middle 0.065 0.065 0.000 High 0.069 0.069 0.000 Total 0.280 0.280 0.000 ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEE FACTORS 2023 2024 CHANGE Land Acquisition per Acre $ 650,000.00 $ 650,000.00 0 Temp. Building Acquisition $ 177,000.00 $ 177,000.00 0 State Match Percentage 0.3615 0.3615 0.0000 Ave. Taxed Value- Single $ 769,979.00 $ 673,008.00 $ (96,971.00) Ave. Taxed Value- Multi $ 308,241.00 $ 328,428.00 $ 20,187.00 Bond Interest Rate 3.58% 3.48% -0.10% Tax Rate per$1000 1.37460 1.57900 0.20440 Construction Cost Allocation $ 246.83 $ 375.00 $ 128.17 `includes HOME&Academy in high numbers Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2024.06.26\2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN final.docx 32