HomeMy WebLinkAboutD_Bogdan_Tree_Removal_RVMP_CAE_LUA25-000027_Final_20250312DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical Areas Exemption
PLANNING DIVISION
ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT
PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION
FROM CRITICAL AREA REGULATIONS
EVALUATION FORM & DECISION
DATE OF DECISION: March 13, 2025
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA25-000027, RVMP, CAE
PROJECT NAME: Bogdan Tree Removal
PROJECT MANAGER: Brianna Burroughs, Associate Planner
APPLICANT/CONTACT: Bogdan Bilan
3720 Lincoln CT NE, Renton, WA 98056
OWNER: Bogdan Bilan
3720 Lincoln CT NE, Renton, WA 98056
PROJECT LOCATION: 3720 Lincoln CT NE, Renton, WA 98056 (APN 3345700200)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Routine Vegetation Management Permit
(RVMP) and Critical Area Exemption (CAE) to remove one (1) failing
maple tree located at 3720 Lincoln CT NE (APN 3345700200). The owner
indicates that the tree has major decay and falling limbs have damaged
neighboring property in a recent windstorm. Photo evidence provided by
the applicant includes fallen tree limbs crushing the neighboring
property’s fence, as well as visible decay of the trunk (Attachments A &
B). The subject property is approximately 21,795 square feet (0.50 acres)
in area and is situated within the Residential-8 (R-8) zone and within the
Kennydale Community Planning Area. The applicant is proposing to
remove the failing maple tree, aiming to mitigate additional risk of
damage to the neighboring property. According to City of Renton (COR)
maps, there is a Category II wetland, as well as moderate landslide
hazards, regulated slopes >15% & <=40%, and high erosion hazards on
the subject property.
CRITICAL AREA: A Category II wetland, as well as moderate landslide hazards, regulated
slopes >15% & <=40%
EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: Renton Municipal Code, Section 4-3-050C.3.c.iii Dangerous Trees:
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Routine Vegetation Management Permit
Bogdan Tree Removal LUA25-000027, RVMP, CAE
Permit Date: March 13, 2025 Page 2 of 6
Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical Areas Exemption
Removal of non-native invasive ground cover or weeds listed by King County Noxious Weed Board or
other government agency or dangerous trees, as defined in Chapter 4-11 RMC which have been
approved by the City and certified dangerous by a licensed landscape architect, or certified arborist,
selection of whom to be approved by the City based on the type of information required. Limited to
cutting of dangerous trees; such hazardous trees shall be retained as large woody debris in critical
areas and/or associated buffers, where feasible.
RMC 4-3-050C.3.c.iii EXEMPT, PROHIBITED AND NONCONFORMING ACTIVITIES: Activities taking
place in critical areas and their associated buffers and listed in the “Exempt Activities – Permitted
Within Critical Areas and Associated Buffers” table are exempt from the applicable provisions of
Section 4-3-050, provided this letter of exemption has been issued.
ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW CRITERIA 4-9-195D.4:
YES 1. The lot shall comply with minimum tree density requirements pursuant to
RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations.
Staff Comments: In accordance with RMC 4-4-130H, compliance with tree
credit requirements necessitates a minimum of 30 tree credits per net acre.
The subject property, which is approximately 21,795 square feet (0.50 acres).
Based on the property size, fifteen (15) trees are required to meet the
minimum tree density requirement (30 tree credits/acre × 0.2 acres = 15
credits).
The applicant’s description of the trees on site (Attachment A), and the Tree
Retention and Credit Worksheet created by staff based on the applicant’s
information (Attachment C) indicate that there is one (1) failing maple tree of
landmark or significant size, on the periphery of the site’s wetland buffer within
the Native Growth Protection Easement and is proposing removal. Forty-two
(42) trees are proposed to remain. Landmark trees are classified as trees with
a caliper of twenty-four inches (24”) or greater, except for big leaf maples,
black cottonwoods, and red alder trees, which qualify as landmark trees with
a caliper of thirty inches (30”) or greater. The tree is a thirty foot (30’) tall maple
tree, however, the applicant has not provided an arborist report specifying the
exact type of maple, or it’s circumference. Given this limited information, staff
is reviewing the application as if it holds a landmark tree status.
According to the applicant’s estimation, there are approximately forty-two
(42) trees on the property ranging from significant to landmark size. These
include one (1) deciduous tree measuring twenty feet (20') in height; twenty
(20) evergreen trees at twenty feet (20') in height each; seven (7) evergreen
trees at thirty feet (30') in height each; one (1) maple tree at fifteen feet (15') in
height; two (2) deciduous trees at ten feet (10') in height each; five (5)
deciduous trees at thirty feet (30') in height each; and six (6) maple trees
ranging in height from forty to fifty feet (40–50'). The retention of the remaining
forty-two (42) trees on the property would maintain the minimum tree density
for the subject property.
YES 2. The land clearing and tree removal shall be consistent with restrictions for
critical areas, pursuant to RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing
Regulations, and RMC 4-3-050, Critical Areas Regulations.
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Routine Vegetation Management Permit
Bogdan Tree Removal LUA25-000027, RVMP, CAE
Permit Date: March 13, 2025 Page 3 of 6
Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical Areas Exemption
Staff Comments: City of Renton (COR) maps has identified a Category II
wetland, as well as moderate landslide hazards, regulated slopes >15% &
<=40% onsite. A critical areas exemption certificate is a component of this
decision due to the presence of a category II wetland on site. The category II
wetland designation is based on the historical record on file with the City, in
which a wetland assessment was provided with the establishment of The
Marshall Short Plat (LUA99-039) (Attachment D). Staff does not anticipate that
the proposed removal would have any negative environmental impact on the
wetland or wetland buffer. Additionally, moderate landslide hazards,
regulated slopes >15% & <=40% do not fall within the threshold of critical area
regulation. However, due to the presence of the wetland, as a condition of
approval, staff would require the applicant to leave a ten foot (10)tall wildlife
snag to mitigate the risk posed by the failing tree. The remaining tree debris
would remain on site to provide habitat to the wetland area.
Refer to the Critical Area Exemption Findings below for additional exemption
information. Removal of the tree aligns with the restrictions for critical areas,
as outlined in RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations and
RMC 4-3-050, Critical Area Regulations.
YES 3. Removal of a landmark tree shall meet the review criteria for removal off
landmark tree, pursuant to RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing
Regulations.
i. The tree is determined to be a high-risk tree; or
ii. The tree is causing obvious physical damage to buildings (over two
hundred (200) square feet), driveways, parking lots, or utilities, and it
can be demonstrated to the Administrator’s satisfaction that no
reasonable alternatives to tree removal exist, including tree root
pruning, tree root barriers, tree cabling, or preventive maintenance,
such as cleaning leaf debris, deadwood removal, or
directional/clearance pruning; or
iii. Removal of tree(s) to provide solar access to buildings incorporating
active solar devices. Windows are solar devices only when they are
south-facing and include special storage elements to distribute heat
energy; or
iv. The Administrator determines the removal is necessary to achieve a
specific and articulable purpose or goal of this Title.
Staff Comments: According to RMC 4-4-130F.2.c.i, a landmark tree may be
removed if it is determined to be high risk. In RMC 4-11-200, a high-risk tree is
classified as such if it has a probable or imminent likelihood of failure; and a
medium or high likelihood of impact; and the consequences of failure for the
tree are significant or severe.
There was no ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualification form provided, thus the
following information is based on the supplemental information submitted by
the owner. According to the property owner, a large branch of the maple broke
off and crushed a fence on the neighbor’s property to the north (3783
Monterey CT NE, APN 5592150050) during a storm in November of 2024.
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Routine Vegetation Management Permit
Bogdan Tree Removal LUA25-000027, RVMP, CAE
Permit Date: March 13, 2025 Page 4 of 6
Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical Areas Exemption
Photos of the tree demonstrate the extent of the damage to the neighbor’s
property. In addition, the photos further demonstrate that the majority of the
tree’s trunk structure is dead or dying by the amount of decay visible on the
tree’s structure (Attachment B).
Since the tree demonstrated the severe consequences of impact and
imminent likelihood of failure, staff concurs that the tree should be removed
due to criteria i in RMC 4-4-130F.2.c being satisfied.
N/A 4. Street frontage and parking lot trees and landscaping shall be preserved
unless otherwise approved by the Administrator.
Staff Comments: Not applicable. The subject tree is not a street frontage tree
nor a parking lot tree. Neither street frontage nor parking landscaping is
proposed to be removed.
N/A 5. The land clearing and tree removal shall not remove any landscaping or
protected trees required as part of a land development permit.
Staff Comments: Not Applicable. The tree was not required as part of a land
development permit for landscaping or tree requirements. Neither street
frontage nor parking landscaping is proposed to be removed.
YES 6. The land clearing and tree removal shall maintain visual screening and
buffering between land uses of differing intensity, consistent with applicable
landscaping and setback provisions.
Staff Comments: The high-risk tree proposed for removal is adjacent to lots
with detached dwellings. Removal of this tree would not remove any required
visual screening and/or buffering between land uses of equal intensity.
YES 7. The land clearing and tree removal shall not create or contribute to a
hazardous condition, such as increased potential for blowdown, pest
infestation, disease, or other problems that may result from selectively
removing trees and other vegetation from a lot.
Staff Comments: Submitted documentation did not indicate that the removal
of the tree would create or contribute to a hazardous condition, rather the
documentation indicated that it could cause greater damage to safety, and
infrastructure in the future if retained.
N/A 8. The land clearing and tree removal shall be consistent with the requirements
of the Shoreline Master Program, pursuant to RMC 4-3-090F1, Vegetation
Conservation, and RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing
Regulations.
Staff Comments: Not applicable. The property is not located within shoreline
jurisdiction.
CRITICAL AREA EXEMPTION FINDINGS:
The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3-
050C.2.d:
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Routine Vegetation Management Permit
Bogdan Tree Removal LUA25-000027, RVMP, CAE
Permit Date: March 13, 2025 Page 5 of 6
Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical Areas Exemption
YES i. The activity is not prohibited by this or any other provision of the Renton
Municipal Code or State or Federal law or regulation;
Staff Comments: Removal of this tree is not prohibited by this or any other
provision of the Renton Municipal Code or State or Federal law or
regulations. Approval of this exemption would act as written permission to
allow the removal of the maple tree.
YES ii. The activity will be conducted using best management practices as
specified by industry standards or applicable Federal agencies or
scientific principles;
Staff Comments: The removal process of the remaining portions of the
tree being snagged at a height of eight to ten feet (8-10’) tall is aimed at
minimizing impacts on the surrounding wildlife, neighboring structures,
and residents, with a specific focus on removing only the tree determined
to be failing. The applicant did not identify how the disturbed wetland
buffer areas were going to be restored after tree removal. Therefore, staff
recommends as a condition of approval, that the applicant reduce the
height of the remaining portion of the high-risk maple tree, located within
the subject property, to a safe height (approximately eight to ten feet (8-
10’) tall and the failing tree shall be left as an environmental habitat snag
as determined by the Current Planning Project Manager. No additional
vegetation removal is proposed.
YES iii. Impacts are minimized and, where applicable, disturbed areas are
immediately restored;
Staff Comments: The removal process is aimed at minimizing potential
damage to people and structures while maintaining the slope and wetland
buffer habitat. This is accomplished through the measures written in FOF ii
above.
YES iv. Where water body or buffer disturbance has occurred in accordance with
an exemption during construction or other activities, revegetation with
native vegetation shall be required;
Staff Comments: The removal of the tree to a ten foot (10’) tall wildlife
snag would not require additional planting as it is not a full removal of the
tree. See FOF ii above, for staff’s recommended condition of approval to
protect the existing wetland habitat and surrounding improvements.
N/A v. If a hazardous material, activity, and/or facility that is exempt pursuant to
this Section has a significant or substantial potential to degrade
groundwater quality, then the Administrator may require compliance with
the Wellhead Protection Area requirements of this Section otherwise
relevant to that hazardous material, activity, and/or facility. Such
determinations will be based upon site and/or chemical-specific data.
Staff Comments: Not applicable. The proposal does not include a
significant or substantial potential to degrade groundwater quality.
DECISION: The Bogdan Tree Removal Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical
Areas Exemption, LUA25-000027, RVMP, CAE is Approved with Conditions*.
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Routine Vegetation Management Permit
Bogdan Tree Removal LUA25-000027, RVMP, CAE
Permit Date: March 13, 2025 Page 6 of 6
Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical Areas Exemption
*CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
The applicant shall reduce the height of the remaining portion of the high-risk maple tree, located
within the subject property, to a safe height of approximately eight to ten feet (8’ -10’) tall. The failing
tree shall be left as an environmental habitat snag as determined by the Current Planning Project
Manager.
SIGNATURE & DATE OF DECISION:
________________________________________ ____________________________________
Matthew Herrera, Planning Director Date
RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be
reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not
readily discoverable prior the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of
fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to
amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person
wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame.
APPEALS: Appeals of permit issuance must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March
27, 2025. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW
43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). Appeals must be submitted electronically to the City Clerk at
cityclerk@rentonwa.gov or delivered to City Hall 1st floor Lobby Hub Monday through Friday. The appeal
fee, normally due at the time an appeal is submitted, will be collected at a future date if your appeal is
submitted electronically. The appeal submitted in person may be paid on the first floor in our Finance
Department. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and additional information
regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office, cityclerk@rentonwa.gov.
EXPIRATION: Two (2) years from the date of decision (date signed).
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Narrative, prepared by applicant, Bogdan Bilan
Attachment B: Photos & Site Location document, prepared by applicant, Bogdan Bilan
Attachment C: Tree Retention and Tree Credit Worksheet, prepared by staff
Attachment D: Wetland Report, historical document, (LUA99-039), prepared by Charles Repath,
Wetland Biologist & Jeffery S. Jones, Certified Wetland Scientist, of J.S. Jones and Associates Inc.
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
3/13/2025 | 1:39 PM PDT
Narrative:
1) Describe how you discovered the tree failure.
• The tree fell during the strong windstorm around Thanksgiving. I heard a lot of loud noises
during the windstorm and the morning after I could see that part of the 30ft Maple Tree fell
down. Furthermore, my neighbor shared pictures from his property of how this tree broke his
fence, crashed into his roof and created a hole all the way down to the second floor of his
house. You can see the damage to the tree, condition of tree and damage it caused to my
neighbor’s house in the images and videos I provided. Please see originally provided
narrative below.
• I am requesting approval to remove the remaining elements of a Maple Tree that fell on my
neighbor's house during the recent windstorm. There are dead and dying trunks/branches
coming out of the same tree base that collapsed onto my neighbor's house - breaking his
fence and causing damage to his roof. The neighbor flagged that he is concerned about the
remaining tree falling onto his property and asked if I can have it removed (his email request
in the attached PDF as well). Given the damage this tree has already caused and the
dead/dying remaining elements of this tree, I believe this is a high-risk tree that poses an
imminent threat to my neighbor's house and property and I do not want to be found liable for
damages if it comes down in an upcoming storm. Therefore, I am requesting the city's
permission for me to remove the tree.
2) Describe how the tree will be removed from the site and any mitigation expected for
removal.
• Tree will be cut down by a professional company. Tree will be cut into small pieces
and left on the property.
3) Provide the tree’s approximate size and type
• Maple Tree ~30ft
4) Describe any known critical areas on the site.
• Tree is not in the critical area, but please see previously attached image (“tree
location” image) that shows where the tree is on the property and what areas of the
property the city has deemed a critical area.
5) Approximately how many other trees are on site? What are the approximate size and
species of these trees?
• There are approximately 42 trees on my property. Unfortunately, I don’t know the
exact species of trees.
• 1 - 20ft deciduous tree
• 20 - 20ft evergreen trees
ATTACHMENT A
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
• 7 - 30ft evergreen trees
• 1 - 15ft maple tree
• 2 - 10ft deciduous trees
• 5 - 30ft deciduous trees
• 6 - 40-50ft Maple trees
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Maple tree fell on neighbor’s house during most recent wind storm.
ATTACHMENT B
RECEIVED
01/28/2025
bburroughs
PLANNING DIVISION
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Requesting to remove one tree (part of which fell on neighbor’s house):
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Neighbor’s concern and email request to remove remaining dangerous maple tree so that it
does not fall on their house & property again.
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
rentonwa.gov/permitservices | planningcustomerservice@rentonwa.gov | 425-430-7294 10/24/2023 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF RENTON Ι PERMIT SERVICES
TREE RETENTION AND CREDIT WORKSHEET
TREE RETENTION REQUIREMENTS
A minimum retention of thirty percent (30%) of all significant trees (as defined in RMC 4-11-200) is required on site.
Please complete the form below to verify compliance with minimum tree retention requirements.
• Identify total number of trees 6-inch caliper or greater (or alder or
cottonwood trees 8-inch caliper or greater) on site: Trees
Trees
Trees
Trees
Trees
Trees Required
Trees Proposed
•Deductions – Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation:
o Trees that are high-risk, as defined in RMC 4-11-200:
o Trees within existing and proposed public right-of-way:
o Trees within wetlands, streams, very high landslide hazards,
protected slopes, and associated buffers:
•Total remaining trees after deductions:
•Required tree retention (30%):
•Identify number of trees proposed for retention:
•Identify number of trees requested for replacement in lieu of retention
(skip page 3 if no tree replacement is requested):Trees
TREE CREDIT REQUIREMENTS
Tree credit requirements apply at a minimum rate of thirty (30) credits per net acre. Complete the form below to
determine minimum tree credit requirements.
•Gross area of property in square feet: Square Feet
•Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from tree credit calculation:
o Existing and proposed public right-of-way: Square Feet
o Wetlands, streams, very high landslide hazards, protected slopes,
and associated buffers: Square Feet
•Total excluded area:Square Feet
•Net land area (after deductions) in square feet:Square Feet
•Net land area (after deductions) in acres:Acres
•Required tree credits:Tree Credits Required
43
43
12.9
42
-29.1
21795
0
21795
0.50
15
ATTACHMENT C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
rentonwa.gov/permitservices | planningcustomerservice@rentonwa.gov | 425-430-7294 10/24/2023 Page 2 of 3
TREE RETENTION AND CREDIT WORKSHEET
PROPOSED TREE CREDITS
Please complete the table below to calculate the total tree credits proposed for your project. Identify the quantity of trees
for each tree category, after deducting trees within excluded areas, as shown in the previous section.
TREE SIZE TREE CREDITS TREE QUANTITY TOTAL TREE CREDITS
RETAINED TREES
Preserved tree 6 – 9” caliper 4
Preserved tree 10 – 12” caliper 5
Preserved tree 12 – 15” caliper 6
Preserved tree 16 – 18” caliper 7
Preserved tree 19 – 21” caliper 8
Preserved tree 22 – 24” caliper 9
Preserved tree 25 – 28” caliper 10
Preserved tree 29 – 32” caliper 11
Preserved tree 33 – 36” caliper 12
Preserved tree 37” caliper and greater 13
NEW TREES
New small species tree (30' or less at maturity) 0.25
New medium species tree (30' to 50' at maturity) 1
New large species tree (50' or more at maturity) 2
TREE CREDITS PROPOSED: 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
rentonwa.gov/permitservices | planningcustomerservice@rentonwa.gov | 425-430-7294 10/24/2024 Page 3 of 3
TREE RETENTION AND CREDIT WORKSHEET
TREE REPLACEMENT JUSTIFICATION
Replacement may be authorized as an alternative to 30% retention provided the removal is the minimum necessary to
accomplish the desired purpose and provided the proposal meets one of the following options:
a.There are special circumstances related to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject
property; or
b.The strict application of the code would prevent reasonable use of property; or
c.The strict application of the code would prevent compliance with minimum density requirements of the zone; or
d.The project is a short plat with four (4) or fewer lots.
Please attach a written justification demonstrating compliance with the requirements and criteria as descripted above.
TREE REPLACEMENT QUANTITY
Tree replacement quantity is determined based on the credit value of the trees proposed for removal. Larger, higher
priority trees shall be used for calculation of tree replacement. Identify the quantity of each tree requested to be removed
in lieu of 30% retention, based on tree size. List the identification number of each tree, as indicated in the arborist report.
TREE SIZE TREE CREDITS TREE QUANTITY TREE INDENTIFICATION # TOTAL TREE CREDITS
Tree 37” caliper + 13
Tree 33 – 36” caliper 12
Tree 29 – 32” caliper 11
Tree 25 – 28” caliper 10
Tree 22 – 24” caliper 9
Tree 19 – 21” caliper 8
Tree 16 – 18” caliper 7
Tree 12 – 15” caliper 6
Tree 10 – 12” caliper 5
Tree 6 – 9” caliper 4
REPLACEMENT CREDITS REQUIRED:
TREE REPLACEMENT PLANTING
Identify the quantity of proposed new replacement trees (minimum size of 2-inch caliper). The total replacement credits
proposed should be equal to or greater than the replacement credits required, as shown in the previous section.
TREE SIZE TREE CREDITS TREE QUANTITY TOTAL TREE CREDITS
New small species tree (30' or less at maturity) 0.25
New medium species tree (30' to 50' at maturity) 1
New large species tree (50' or more at maturity) 2
REPLACEMENT CREDITS PROPOSED:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
ATTACHMENT D
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C
Docusign Envelope ID: 3E91F74B-3E27-4ECF-B328-CD19C3382C4C