The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR_Clover Creek BLM TRAQISA Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client C f::Qy:E i. c '?e"'(!:: ,c.. tto A Date 4-1-i-'l. S-Time Ip: 3a &M Address/Tree location X'\~c..et-11p,.14 S-11~ -A Tree no. __ _.._ __ Sheet -1-of -2:_ Treespecies C•t, L.t'-+ N\l~½: (.\n. dbh 3<P'" Height ~o• Crownspreaddla. LI£' Assessor(s) AQW Co,,¥-.e>tr\ Time frame 2. \/ff: Tools used 6"-1''-1-1 '2. I':,, ~ I ... ' I Taraet Assessment T1ra1tzone ' IJ ~ ,~ Occupancy ~ JJ l'ltl 0 ., Ii 1:= 1-rare .. l' t!! I 2 -occasional Ii Ta,pt description Jf ~i J~ 3-frequent 'C 'ti ie 4-constant Ee a:: a. 1 ~OM6 I/ LI .. I ") 2 \.l~Hlt.Le~ I/ 2. tJ "I 3 4 Site Factors History of failures 'If S Topography Flat□ Slopeef IO % Aspect _tJ_ Site cha~ None ljjf Grade change □ Site clearing□ Changed soil hydrology □ Root cuts□ Describe _____________ _ Soil conditions Limited volumeJ;if Saturated□ Shallow □ Compacted□ Pavement over rootsif y O % Describe _________ _ Prevailing wind direction Sl$W Common weather Strong windsizl Ice~ Snow~ Heavy rainJZ Describe ___________ _ Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor LowJa' Normal □ High □ Foliage None (seasonal)□ None (dead)□ Normal __ % Pests I;-)•~ C> b~~ Ablotfc ~\lit..!.:, N..~~~.,...,....---------------- Chlorotic __ % Necrotic t;'O % Spedes failure profile Branchesi;a' Trunk□ Roots □ Describe \¼o~ f\rc....,.c).. ~½~f Load Factors ' Wind exposure Protected □ Partial It Full □ Wind funneling □ _________ Relative crown size Small □ MediumiJ Large □ Crown density Sparse'1 Normal□ Dense □ Interior branches Few□ Normal~ Dense □-Vlnes/Mistletoe/Mossllf \/1NES: Recent or planned change In load factors --JJ~""----------------------------- Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Ukellhood of Failure -Crown and Branches - Unbalanced crown J2f LCR J,t!J_% Dead twigs/branches i!f ~o % overall Max. dia. IS-+" Broken/Hangers Number ~ S: Max. dia. ~ Over-extended branches □ Pruning history Crown cleaned □ Thinned □ Raised □ Reduced □ Topped □ Lion-tailed □ Flush cuts □ Other Main concem(s) ~r .. w-.e,l ~"' I I "'-'x Cracks JZJ ___________ _ Lightning damage □ Codominanti!f ------------Included bark □ Cavity/Nest hole_% circ. Similar branches present.ef Sapwood damage/decay □ Weak attachments li!!f ______ _ Previous branch failures ~ ----- Dead/Missing bark /6 Cankers/Galls/Burls □ Conks □ Heartwood decay □ ________ _ Response growth----------------- Load on defect N/A □ Minor □ Moderatejlf Significant □ ----------------- Ukellhood of failure Improbable D Possible D Probable O Imminent ~----------------- -Trunk- Dead/Missing bark J2J Abnormal bark texture/color Rf Codomlnant stems~ Included bark)lJ Cracksiief Sapwood damage/decay □ Cankers/Galls/Burls □ Sap ooze □ Lightning damage □ Heartwood decay □ Conks/Mushrooms □ Cavity/Nest hole __ % circ. Depth___ Poor taper □ Lean __ • Corrected? ___________ _ Response growth~~-,------------ Main concern(s) ~~ ofr-f!\v,\r, -¼~ ~tVA Y fl:£" \Oo~ dCG...~ Load on defect N/A □ Minor □ Moderate □ Significantaf Ukellhood of failure Improbable O Possible □ Probable D lmmlnent}lf -Roots and Root Collar - Collar buried/Not visible,' Depth___ Stem girdling □ Dead O Decay □ Conks/Mushrooms □ Ooze □ Cavity □ __ % circ. nt 2r' Cracks □ Cut/Damaged rootsp Distance from trunk -c:::_....:;.-;;,_ Root plate lifting □ Soll weakness~ Response growth _____________ _ Malnconcern(s) &n,on, ,,rood ;l\cls.,\g, \ 1::y Load on defect N/A □ Minor □ Moderate □ Significant)lf Likelihood of failure lmprobable;lf Posslble D Probable D Imminent D Page I of 2 Risk Categorization .. Likelihood J .. Failure & Impact Consequences E CII .8 Failure Impact (from Matrix 1) ::II "" E C C Risk ::, :I ! CII ftl C .. ~ • .. rating t; 1: " N i .!! j e s: • :a C 'iii !6 .. J! .a ! ~ ! ~ ~ of part Conditions ~ CII Target .a .3 .i J ~ :i .. ! 8 !!!I ~ l e ~ ~ l s: e J ~ l j c ~ (from Tree part of concern ftl ii ~ protection s e s ~ !I c .S! ~ JI Jt a. I&. II. II. =i: %: ::, :::J z ~ Ill Matrix 21 rJ ,.. -e (7, r C -r ,.. ~~°" Lih1 \ \. . ( [/ \ . r,, \ ~ '-'-('t.(}t) 1 ~("Q.~\. e ,,, r ~ ,-... ,.... e ,... ?.. .. J ~ ~ L r ~~ \"" ( (.., \.., ~ V \.... V \. , \. , ~ ~ IM.oO r r Ir {---{-(-r e l . \. ' \. . \.,... \.. \ . \ . L ; \. , \. ,,-,-, -r .,..... 0 e r ,,.... ~ ~ r r I'""' (/ °l'"'" ~ \ ..J \ . , ... \ I/ \ \ v \. ~ \ ~,~ 2 1'r~/\~s J ;c -,.... 0. -r -." ~ C ll " ~-\"'"rt., ~ \. ,j \. ; t ... Cl'. \. ; \. ; (/ \ V ~0,0 C: r,, r r, r r -----\ \ \ ; \ ; \-; \ \ \ \. , \ \.. {l. ---,,..... ,.., r, ~ -l, e -\ ~ ., ,J \..., v v V V v v V \.... --ll'),.i 3 <p_~~ -,..., -(7, ,..... --<7: --. --~ rcl'i ,av,.. 1,.. J rt: \. ' \ , \. ; \. ; \. \. ) \ \. ; \. fl: '"., V l c>W -,---{ ; --l, C --t., --~ \. ; \. ( \ \. \. ~ \. '-....; --,----C: r n -C ,.... \. \ ; \ ; \. { ; \ , \. \ \.. \. ., \. \.___, 4 -,---r, r (, -. ( -\. \ \ , \. \. ; \. \. . \ ; \. ' \. , \. ~ ( ' -,-( .. \ ,.... r C - \. .. \. , \. .. \. . \. _; \ ; \ l l ~ l Matrix I. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Likelihood of Impacting Target of Failure Very low Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely --- Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Matrixl. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Consequences of Failure Failure & Impact Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme --- Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate North Unlikely Low Low Low Low Notes, explanations, descriptions ____________ _ Mitigation options --------------------------------Residual risk ___ _ • I ; \/e.s. Cr•"'"-C..¼'M'. RcJN>w \or•~/ dw.~ lore>"'cW Resldualrisk bOW • 'l. ! .;lo , \\c;,. \~ +\.!.. ~ \ s d~ d.. d,~ :::fp v, '1\..1-. 5 Residual risk H-tC:zt+ sh~\, I\~ N\'>h \ ½ ,,;,\..... co -~c,M +rl.4.,11\ \'-S Residual risk ___ _ Overall tree risk rating Low D Moderate D Hlg~ Extreme D Work priority 1$ 2 D 3 D 4 D Overall residual risk Low D Moderate D High,! Extreme D Recommended inspection Interval -------- Datajl{Flnal D Preliminary Advanced assessment needed □No □Yes-Type/Reason ___________________ _ Inspection limitations-one □Visibility □Access □Vines □Root collar burled Describe ________________ _ Thls datashcct was produced by the International Society of Arborlculture (ISA) and ls Intended for use by Tree Risk Assmment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists -2013 Page 2 of 2