The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA87-049 ITV OF RENTON JAN 61238 , CITY OF RENTON 0.► oil/ BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. Earl H. Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division January 5, 1988 TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM: Gary A. Norris, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Renton Community Recreation Center 1717 Maple Valley Highway Please be advised that the conditions listed in our December 7, 1987, review of the Renton Community Recreation Center have been agreed to by the Parks and Recreation Department through coordination of responsibilities with RaMac, Inc. 's, Park Place development. Therefore, the Renton Community Recreation Center building permit should not be delayed for those listed conditions. Refer to the attachments. ,e17• CEM:ad Attachments cc: John Webley CEM3 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2620 December 7. 1987 Renton City Council Minutes— Page 413 Franchise: City of Seattle Public Works/Utility Engineering Department submitted proposed City of Water Department Seattle Water Department franchise, permit, and water supply agreement. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter from City Attorney Warren requested Council comments prior to Annexation: Liberty public hearing on the Liberty View/Conner plat to be held by the King View/Conner County Hearing Examiner on 12/8/87, to assure that City of Renton development standards are met before the area annexes to Renton. The site is located in King County south of the existing Renton corporate limits between State Highway 167 and State Route 515. A second letter addressed issues on which City representatives and the developer have reached agreement pertaining to traffic, walkways, parking, street widths, curbs, storm water retention, parks, lot size, emergency access, fire flow, sewers, and future rights to build. Still to be resolved is the question of applicability of Renton's setback regulations on the ultimate development if the property is annexed after being platted in King County. Police: Jail Contract Form Police Department requested approval of jail contract form with other Revision jurisdictions which increases daily fee from $25 to $35 for prisoners. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUEST AND REFER THE MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR REVISION OF • TITLE I-4102(H), FEE SCHEDULE OF CITY CODE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Community Services Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Community Services recommending that Building Department permit fees for the Community Committee ' Center be waived, less the amounts actually paid by the Building Department Parks: Community Center I to other non-city agencies (i.e. outside government agencies and contractors providing plan check services.) The amount of the fees waived will not exceed $25,000. , The Committee further recommended that the use of Park Department property for well sites and water and storm drainage lines be considered as adequate compensation for the various utility fees. The relative value for use of Park Department property and service received from the Park Department will be determined by the method prescribed by the Finance Department. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CAG: 87-072, Community Services Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Community Center recommending acceptance of the low bid from Levernier Construction for the Renton Community Center in the amount of $3,545,000 (including all additive alternates). The Park Board concurs in the recommendation. The Committee further recommended that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract with the low bidder. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. King County: Solid Waste Councilwoman Keolker reported that only one person testified for the Interlocal Agreement environmental community at the King County Council hearing on solid waste interlocal agreement held on 11/30/87. The matter has been referred to Committee for action on 12/21/87, and it is probable that the 12/31/87 deadline for cities to sign the agreement will be extended. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance #4100 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of property Rezone: Ryder Beil located along the north side of Sunset Boulevard NE between 140th Avenue SE (if extended) and 144th Avenue SW (if extended) to R-1, single family residential, zone for the Ryder Beil annexation property. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT December 7, 1987 COMMUNITY CENTER The Community Services Committee recommends that the Building Department permit fees for the community center be waived, less the amounts actually paid by the Building Department to other non-city agencies (i.e. outside government agencies and contractors providing plan check services) . The amount of the fees waived will not exceed $25,000. The Committee further recommends that the use of Park Department property for well sites and water and storm drainage lines be considered as adequate compensation for the various utility fees. The relative value for use of Park Department property and service received. from. the Park Department will be determined by the method prescribed by the Finance Department. —/ i &c (-No'VIZ a4 Nancy MaEiews, Chair ;;wz)f Clc Richard Stredicke Earl Clymer C a .CITY -►F RENTON ® Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean-Mark E. Barber -Zanetta L. Fontes-Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys November 12, 1.987 TO: Jim Shepherd, Facilities Superintendent FROM : Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Fees for Community Center Dear Jim: The Community Services Committee asked for my opinion concerning waiver of the utilities fees in exchange for the use by the utility of park property for well sites, pipe lines and similar uses. I have previously given an opinion that such a trade-off is acceptable as long as the City can justify that the amounts are approximately equal. If the value of an easement, well site, etc. is greater or equal to the amount of the fees to be charged to connect to the water and sewer, then there is no exchange of money necessary. However , the method of calculation and the assumptions need to be reduced to writing so that the City can memorialize how the exchange took place. If you need any further information, please le me know. 1 Law ence J. Warren LJW:nd cc: Mayor N8. 14: 47 • Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 October 12, 1987 Renton City Council Minutes Page 321 transportation improvements including a perimeter road using Logan and Smithers, connection of Factory and Houser Way, realignment of Garden, and connection of 4th to Sunset. Administrative Assistant Parness confirmed that suggested options have been considered and will be reviewed in the 20-year transportation plan; however, a detailed analysis will not be available for at least six months. Upon inquiry, it was noted that occupancy of the Boeing office building is planned for July of 1988. Council questioned staff comment that the one-way couplet system is reversible if determined inappropriate at a later date, noting that reversal is unlikely. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONTINUE THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND THE COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 12, 1987, TO THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1987, AT 7:30 P.M. TO RESPOND TO REQUEST FOR REZONE, TO ANTICIPATE APPEAL FROM SITE PLAN, AND TO URGE PUBLIC TO READ DOCUMENTS WITH REFERENCE TO CEDAR RIVER CORRIDOR STUDY ON THIS ISSUE. CARRIED. RECESS MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 11:42 p.m. Council reconvened at 11:55 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present, except Trimm. Councilman Trimm returned at 12:03 p.m. AUDIENCE COMMENT Jerry Woods, 17712 SE Petrovitsky Road, Renton, reported that he was issued Citizen Comment: Woods a citation for overtime parking while shopping in the downtown area, and - Parking Ticket requested that the one-hour limit be extended to two to allow shoppers sufficient time to complete their business. Council requested that the Police Department be asked for an opinion regarding appropriateness of one-hour versus two-hour parking limits. Citizen Comment: Jett - Allen Jett, 583 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton, asked for a response from the RVTI Landscape Buffer Building Director to his request at Council meeting of 10/5/87 and earlier letter regarding sidewalk intrusion into landscape buffer at Renton Vocational Technical Institute. Mayor Shinpoch asked Mr. Jett to contact her office on 10/13/87 for a response. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Claim: Anderson, Claim for damages in the amount of $50,000 filed by Gary F. Bass, attorney CL-49-87 representing Victoria Anderson, 220 Park Avenue North, Renton, for alleged false arrest by Renton Police (08/25/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Police: Code Revision for City Attorney requested modification of Code Section 10-1707(B), regarding Towing Procedure towing hearing procedure, to correct inconsistency in wording. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Parks:Community Parks Department requested waiver of land use fees ($1,942.50), building Center, Waiver of Fees permit fees ($19,306.18), and utilities fees ($6,640.00) for Community Center in the total amount of $27,888.68. Refer to Community Services Committee. Police: Anti-Harrassment Police Department recommended adoption by reference of new State law State Law prohibiting violation of anti-harrassment order. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Rezone: Kohl-Public Policy Development Department requested public hearing be set on 10/26/87, Storage Annexation to consider rezone of the 3.52 acre Kohl-Public Storage annexation site located west of Rainier Avenue South from 100 feet north of South 117th Place south to the existing City limits. Council concur. Annexation: Kohl-Public City Clerk reported King County Boundary Review Board has received no Storage request for review nor has chosen to invoke jurisdiction on the Kohl-Public Storage Annexation, 3.52 acres located west of Rainier Avenue South from 100 feet north of South 117th Place south to the existing City limits. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # G . e 6 AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING -== SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Parks For Agenda Of October 12, 1987 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact jiiq Shepherd (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Request to waiver fees for Consent X new community center Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach• New Business Study Session A. Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No X N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes No.X N/A Other Clearance Community Services Committee FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) Request all or a portion of permit and related fees for new community center be waived. Fees projected to be approximately $27,888. The breakdown is as follows: Land Use Fees $ 1,942 Building permit 19,306 (inc. Plan review, mechanical electrical, plumbing) Utilities fees 6,640 Waiver of fees would allow this money to be spent on construction/equipment PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED.CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. %o CITY OF RENTON "LL PARKS and RECREATION Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor John E. Webley, Director October 5, 1987 MEMORANDUM TO: John Webley, Parks Director FROM: Jim Shepherd, Facilities Superintendent RE: Permit Fees for Community Center The following is a breakdown of the permit fees for the community center: LAND USE FEES: 1. Site Plan Approval $ 392.50 2. Variance 150.00 3. Environmental Fee 430.00 (Based upon 3.7 million value) 4. Shoreline Management 970.00 $ 1,942.50 BUILDING PERMITS: 1. Site Plan $ 5,810.68 2. Building permit 8,939.50 3. Mechanical permits 226.00 4. Plumbing permits 510.00 $19,306.18 UTILITIES FEES: 1. Sanitary sewer $ 50.00 2. Storm sewer 50.00 3. Right-of-way construction 50.00 , 4. Inspection/Approval 6,490.00 Sanitary sewer ($1,500) Water ( 1,140) Storm sewer ( 1,500) Street, walks, curbs ( 2,350) $ 6,640.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $27,888.68 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 • OF Rh Lc. - 0 THE CITY OF RENTON t/ z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON;WASH.98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER '534 Go' FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9gr�o SEP'�EMO September 11, 1987 John Webley Director, Parks and Recreation Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Renton Community Center File No. SA-049-87 Dear Mr. Webley: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published August 27, 1987 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, -S-deL (2. ez.ed 41( FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER - FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 27th day of August , 1987 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. .P SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this (9 7 ' day of 2T,4l / 1987_. ' (4)9Z-24:0! Notary Public in and for the . State of Washington, F residing at —Prp�.Zr-,•ti , therein. SA-049-87 and V-050-87 Application, Petition, or Case #: CITY OF'RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) August 27, 1987 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT File No.: SA-049-87, V-050-87 LOCATION: Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval and a variance for construction of the Renton Community Center. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Site Plan is approved with conditions. The Variance request is denied. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was received DEPARTMENT REPORT: by the Examiner on August 11, 1987 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the' application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on August 18, 1987 at 9:45 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Master Site Plan. Exhibit #3 - Site Plan for Phase I. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by the Zoning Administrator, Don Erickson. Erickson pointed out the City would like to develop a community center on this property; the site is 18.5 acres in size, the proposed facility would be 36,000 square feet and will be a multi-use center. It is the intent of the City to try to bring people to the site without creating additional traffic; access is from Maple Valley Highway and Houser Way; there are sufficient utilities available to the site; transit service is available, and this proposal will tie into the park and trail system for the City. Mr. Erickson stated the ERC reviewed the project and had concerns regarding traffic noting the new building will be located in a very high traffic density area; the applicant was asked to participate in a greater regional traffic study for the area, and is requested to provide traffic counts and volumes generated by this site; and questions were raised regarding drainage from the site to the aquifer due to City wells located in the area. A review was given of the criteria to be considered when considering a Site Approval request noting the proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, and complies with the Cedar River Strategy Plan. Mr. Erickson advised certain rooms within the building will be terraced toward the river; the center will be located in an area that will depend heavily on automobile access and staff feels it necessary to explore other methods to improve pedestrian access. By the time the community center is completed it was pointed out the I-405 S-curve improvements may be in effect; this site will enhance property values and set a direction for future development in the area; and Mr. Erickson reviewed the ERC mitigation measures requested for the site and aquifer such as the provision of a delineated pedestrian/vehicle linkage between Liberty Park and Cedar River Park under the freeway which would extend the trail system and provide a link from this site to the Civic Center and downtown portion of the City. It was also a condition of the ERC that a system of stop signs be placed along the circulation corridors of the site; a more extensively bermed, landscape buffer be provided along the eastern portion of the site; more extensive landscaping to the west edge of the site to buffer I-405;.a pedestrian activated crossing between the site and the median in the middle of SR-169 to provide safe crossing • �� CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT SA-049-87, V-050-87 August 27, 1987 Page 2 between the site and the industrial/commercial uses to the north; and the possible creation of a right turn-in lane eastbound and a left turn-in westbound for traffic entering the site from SR-169. Continuing, the Zoning Administrator said the site is setback from 1-405 by more than 100 ft.; air quality/dust may be a problem because of activities on the adjoining site and the freeway but it is felt extensive landscaping will help filter out some of the dust, noise and odors from those activities. In reviewing the request for a Variance for fewer parking stalls at the recreation center, Erickson stated the matter was reviewed with the applicant and there will be approximately 584 parking stalls needed with the applicant having proposed 367; it is not felt the applicant will suffer any undue hardship more than any other business in the area requiring the same type of parking requirements; suggested other remedies available to the applicant as mentioned in Section 4.22.28.12 which could approve the installation or delay of up to 50% of the minimum number of parking stalls required if the applicant proves the need for reduced parking and reserves an area for that parking at a future date. With all of the above information staff recommended approval of the Site Approval request with the conditions set out in their report, and denial of the requested parking Variance. Calling for testimony in support of this proposal from the applicant or their representative, responding for the applicant was John Weblev, Director, Parks and Recreation Department, City of Renton. Mr. Webley noted for the record that he was in agreement with the recommendations by staff and added explanation to some of the findings contained within the staff report. He stated regarding pedestrian access, currently there is a Master Trail Plan within the City that would include looking at the plateau to the north of the site and a means of accessing Maple Valley Highway to get to the park, as well as looking at the 1-405 S-Curve Plan and the Cedar River Trail Natural Zone Plan that will ultimately effect this property; the Department of Transportation has agreed to include the linkage between Liberty Park and the Civic Center to Cedar River Park on the north side and to the Cedar River Trail System on the south. He stated with that in mind they had decided to wait for those actions to take place as well as a railroad abandonment which is being pursued by the DOT which will impact the trail on the south side of the Cedar River. The DOT is proposing to provide access trail systems from both sides of the river from Liberty Park to the proposed site. Referring to landscaping, Mr. Webley stated since the I-405 project is being considered and a small portion of the park will be taken, DOT has been requested by the City to buffer this site from that action; a landscape buffer on the eastern boundary will be aesthetically more appealing than the adjoining use at Stoneway Concrete, and will be located on City property; well field protection concerns will be worked out with the Utilities Department and DOE to design a system that is satisfactory and he noted they have made design changes to move drainage away from the well fields and the building itself. Webley stated the final design should prove to be satisfactory; a left turn pocket coming from the east and right hand turn lane to be provided will be worked out with Traffic Engineering and must be approved by the State, and access to the park will be designed so it can accommodate desirable emergency vehicles within the park as well as speed bumps or stop signs to slow traffic within the park. Referring to the Variance from specific parking requirements, Mr. Webley stated the Variance was sought as it was recommended by the Building and Zoning Department because the Parking Ordinance did not cover this type of facility, and the facilities used for the parking requirements were based on a City Hall-type complex which he stated really does not meet proper criteria for this proposal. He agreed parking requirements as suggested by staff are acceptable to his Department. Speaking to this matter was Helen Klann, 1901 N.E. Third, #402, Renton, Washington who expressed concern over the pedestrian crossing between the north part of the park and Maple Valley Highway. She asked for clarification of the proposed access. She noted pedestrians come from north to south to the area, and after development of the new facility, more pedestrian traffic will be created thereby causing concern for their safety to and from the new facility. She also questioned if the park would be more pedestrian or vehicle access and was advised it would more than likely be a combination of both, but due to the proximity of the new facility it is considered more of a drive-to site. However, due to its location on the river the City is trying to enhance through the trail system the access and improve the development to further encourage pedestrian/bike access. Ms. Klann noted her favorable impression of the new Renton.Community Center plan. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:25 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, the City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department, filed a request for approval of a site plan for a multiple use indoor recreation facility, together with a request for a variance from the provisions of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • SA-049-87, V-050-87 August 27, 1987 Page 3 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located in the Cedar River Park, just west of the Carco Theater, at 1717,, Maple Valley Highway. The site is immediately east of I-405, south of the Maple Valley Highway and north of the Cedar River. 7. The site is part of the original townsite of the City of Renton. It was originally zoned, and remains zoned, P-1 (Public/Quasi-Public). 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of recreation uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. A variety of zoning districts surround the subject site. •An R-1 (Single Family Residential) district is located southwest of the subject site. South and east of the site is an H-1 (Heavy Industry) district. North of the Maple Valley Highway is a B-1 (Business/Commercial) district. 10. The City of Renton has approved a bond issue to construct an indoor community recreation complex at the Carco/Cedar River Park site. The complex will contain approximately 36,000 sq. ft.. It will consist of recreational components including a gym, racquetball courts and fitness center, meeting rooms including a banquet/dance area and arts and crafts areas, and administrative space. 11. The facility was conceived as a "drive to" facility fairly centrally located with access via Maple Valley Highway and an underpass under I-405. The facility was envisioned as a City-wide community complex rather than a neighborhood park or recreation building. The nearest residential communities are Renton Hill south of the site across the Cedar River, Monterey Terrace north of the site across the Maple Valley Highway, and the downtown North and South Renton residential communities. 12. Topography generally separates most of the residential population from the location with steep hillsides, generally making pedestrian access a secondary consideration. Staff has suggested that pedestrian and possibly bicycle access could be bolstered by providing a protected, or at least signed crossing at the Maple Valley Highway. The Trails Master Plan also suggests access via a trail which would parallel the Cedar River. The State, in reviewing the widening of I-405, has included a pedestrian link of some kind on the east side of the freeway which would cross the River providing a link with Renton Hill. 13. The complex will be one story high over its 36,000 sq. ft. footprint. The building will be approximately 100 feet from I-405, approximately 250 feet from the Cedar River (observing the shoreline setback of the Shoreline Master Program), 300 feet from its easterly property line, and 600 feet from the Maple Valley Highway. Windows are oriented away from I-405, oriented instead toward the river view. The complex will have masonry exterior walls to reduce noise impacts on persons inside the building. Architectural variety is exemplified by the mix of modulated facades, gable and hip roofs, and the masonry exterior which will provide additional texture. 14. Uses surrounding the site, as opposed to the zoning districts, are the two highways, I-405 and Maple Valley Highway to the west and north, the Cedar River and railroad right-of-way to the south, and Stoneway Concrete, a heavy industrial use to the east. 15. Staff was particularly concerned with the eastern neighbor, the concrete plant. It is conceived as less than an aesthetic neighbor both visually and acoustically. In addition, the operation produces dust which could impact air quality, although air quality was not specifically analyzed. 16. Staff recommended additional landscaping be planted along the eastern property line to buffer the entire park site, not only the new complex, from the concrete plant. Landscaping would screen the complex from the visual,acoustic, and to some extent the dust impacts of the concrete plant. • 17. The complex has been designed to allow expansion in the future when demand rises. 18. Parking variances were sought based upon initial estimates that approximately 1100 parking spaces were -required. Staff indicates that the applicant misinterpreted, on the conservative side, CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT SA-049-87, V-050-87 August 27, 1987 Page 4 the requirements for the baseball field and assembly areas. With future expansion, parking for approximately 584 vehicles would be required. The applicant now proposes 367 parking stalls which staff contends is sufficient when coupled with provisions of the parking and loading Ordinance which permit delay and future review of up to 50% of the required parking, as long as sufficient space is reserved for the parking. Staff has indicated no physical hardships would justify a grant of a Variance. CONCLUSIONS Site Plan 1. The Site Plan Ordinance provides a number of specific criteria generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. There can be no question regarding compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is designated for recreational uses in the Plan, and the community recreation complex proposed obviously complies with that designation. It also obviously complies with the Park and Recreation Plan in that it will create and add to an already vital system of high quality community parks. 3. Staff's major concern regarding the site plan actually revolves around the site not the plan. The site, while centrally located, is not easily accessible due to its proximity to the I-405/Maple Valley Highway interchange. Staff has suggested that the City work with the State to provide a safer means of crossing the Maple Valley Highway north of the site to allow pedestrian/bike traffic to reach the center, with less problems than now would exist. A protected crossing and signal have been suggested. Access via an I-405 related underpass and bridge has been contemplated, and staff suggested the underpass which now exists should be upgraded for pedestrian passage, a passage now shared nervously with vehicles. 4. The facility is designed to take advantage of its water's edge location. Windows have been directed toward the river. Both for aesthetic reasons and for acoustics, windows have been directed away from I-405. Maple Valley Highway is sufficiently north of the site, 600 or so feet, that no particular problems exist. 5. The complex should not have an adverse impact upon adjacent facilities either public or private. Although the location of the recreation center could require additional screening of industrial uses near the site. Staff and the applicant have indicated that the City will plant additional landscape materials along the eastern edge of the site to minimize both the visual and dust impacts created by the concrete plant next door. The complex should not have an adverse impact upon the Carco Theater, and is setback more than the required 200 feet from the shoreline. 6. One potential impact considered by the ERC is the city's water well system. Conditions for protection and monitoring were required by the ERC and the impacts should be minimal. 7. The one story, masonry building will not be visually intrusive and should blend with the area and the existing theater. There appear to be no adverse impacts upon adjacent property. There also would appear to be no impacts upon property values, although the closer residences on Renton Hill would appear to benefit by the shorter distances to the complex. 8. As has been indicated, staff has suggested better accommodations for pedestrian and bicycle patronage by providing,some form of protected route across the Maple Valley Highway and a • separate pedestrian entry under I-405 to separate cars and pedestrians more efficiently. Eventually the city's trail system will provide an additional means of getting to the complex. It • CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT SA-049-87, V-050-87 August 27, 1987 Page 5 is expected to run westerly at least from the vicinity of the Maple Valley Golf Course to the site and connect in some fashion to Liberty Park and the central city west of I-405. The interconnection of these various facilities will also create a large multifaceted park system for residents of the community. 9. In addition, the underpass has unfortunately become a bypass route to avoid the signal at I-405, Bronson and the Maple Valley intersection. The Parks Department has recognized this and has implemented a series of measures to minimize pass through traffic attempting to avoid the signal. The measures include stop signs, less direct through access, and could involve speed bumps if necessary. 10. The building is adequately set back from any other structure and is assured of adequate light and air. The landscape buffer is also intended to assist in cleansing the air of dust generated by the concrete factory. Apparently similar conditions are being contemplated for some proposed work on that site. 11. While two transit lines pass by and serve the site, access to the site is generally anticipated to be by passenger car. The transit is there and available for those who desire it. The site is adequately served by utilities and should not tax the existing infrastructure. 12. The site is well landscaped, with the building oriented to take advantage of the river and to avoid adverse impacts from I-405. Landscaping, as has been emphasized, will screen the easterly concrete plant. Additional plantings are also intended to soften the affects of any I-405 retaining wall created when 405 is realigned. Parking areas are also landscaped, with the ball fields presenting a large, practical expanse of lawn to the north, toward the Maple Valley Highway. Variance 13. While it would be unfortunate, if not shameful to eliminate landscaping, lawn area or other recreational open space to provide additional parking, there is no evident hardship which would justify granting a variance. Simply, the City is placing a lot of emphasis on this one parcel and the parking demand for each of the uses will eventually compromise parking standards. It does not appear apparent that a variance is in order especially when staff has pointed out other avenues. 14. Provisions of the permit could defer an ultimate decision on the parking load for at least up to 50 percent of the requirement until after occupancy. This provision in, and of itself, negates any justification for a variance at this time. Since other remedies may be available, approval of a variance is not an appropriate response. .The variance therefore should be denied. 15. In conclusion, the total scope of the project and its impacts appears to be positive. It will provide the long sought after goal of providing a varied and well designed community recreation facility. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The City work with the State on both the I-405 and Maple Valley Highway access and crossing points to assure safe efficient vehicular and pedestrian access to the Cedar River Park complex. 2. The City provide a safe means of utilizing the I-405 underpass by both pedestrians and vehicles. 3. The City develop a 'detour' system to discourage through traffic between Houser Way and SR-169. 4. The installation of screening landscaping along the I-405 and eastern property line to soften or screen out the visual impacts along both those respective property lines. The Variance is denied. ORDERED THIS 27th day of August, 1987. FRED . AUFMA HEARI G EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT SA-049-87, V-050-87 August 27, 1987 Page 6 TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of August, 1987 to the parties of record: Helen Klann 1901 N.E. Third #402 Renton, Washington John Webley Director, Parks and Recreation Department City of Renton TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of August, 1987 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. September 10, 1987. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Renton • . .• ARAI/JACKSON Community ARCHITECTS PLANNERS Recreation Center • • • / 7_,_..., . .-,‘\\\\\,. , - • J \`• . NE Ppp r< r' 1 fl)3 i ">XjSTI s \�.. G4.SPh1 S / % HELP PAIL �i �. / . 3B 'A� 1 • , ,:5- ::\\ • ;,� ' 1. / %'~`l ► j w. , • j U 9 do • h ,, �. N:es ".'c1 -^ f'�} �" CID -} '''''....ts ,',/ \ i.'. Ci../C' _,. )7) .: 601 4 " . • ::: 0 , 4, 4 — o 0 1/(/ dp -rT PErASE;'f. , J.. co , I 0... ., . ,7r,cmI I A,I..4. .'' T P - - ' .j %� .• \ i'1 �` • .. ��+ �> Cf N'1't jam" • /'."'"tir. . "?it" " "„ '-) <.\ ),(Q<'/ " \ . -./ • ,-- / %'.1 -_-- _ ( r /-- • �,. �-- BEACH ' EAT, - ; (4\ .--,_- _ �_ 1` (jay/D{ �. Q-�!J / LI _ . 4rmli . �., , 1 • . _ . _Z . -� 1• 1 SE 68'•!S • 1 , • : i LAND USE CLEMENT \ , • i, ,..) ii! , ii .• 1 ,,, r'1 volmaimail . , . 1 • ni S• ingle Family ; ,. I Commerci..si ,°' Ittit11:1 • • -• .• • i----1 L• ow Density V fil.., 76 Is ST a 1 . Office / Office Park i °,--- -••••••••••-..... + ts:. •,-:•:** / 1YU r- Multi-Family ''.\... .. . _ / t': • r p. RI Mi i ...N. , * • anin Medium Density ..0.0.000.0.0000:. :0....0.0...0:700.: Pubiic/Quasi-Public i 1 f, ::•:i:i::. __ _ - . ...................... .............. ............. Multi-Family ...000.0. 1 :iiiiiiiiiiiiiii::::' 1 . , -- 1, 1:1.:::::ii I t,.:.v ---ks. . 1:11:::::Mi i 4: ,,:ositaCk, IL wirome:•:•:•>:. 011:OR High Density ..•... .., . . , i 4 "1:11:11j E 1:Zga . Li ".•°° gnt industrial ' ''t$ Multi-Family 00.•... iA1. 111 ii 111 e .-. ...._ )1/ ii.11 to T.:: — Recreation i0 0•0 0 0 0, Heavy Industrial ••,4' •• , 'o o o . •"' iF ' A Greenbelt • ,..,:s.` ",•',.: Greenbelt i kfianufacturing Park i i',': ,.. L. 4 -.'".1,. c''•c. . ' / fAiitiple Optiwni 1/ NM 4 ; 14,,... %• ., ,,.....:?';g-` ,..::-.' .4.a".viry.,*,,,..1,•••,-*....-4. "4-..... ^....,1C,.1..14 4.4,10.1..../41,44.1.,V.414•Agg-V,--A.A....e.V.V....6e4,-,.-4.4.-1 .sit WV-. -'" '.-• -,••••••-•••,i. 6•-•._ Revised April 1985 i 8 ‘. 1.....iii:10...„ •(....8.-..f.e.;:.2,4•,,,T::::,,,N , • ..., \ 1 . • m • ' c! 'M [•-•-! t'1•4 Vt. . i N,\•.... Vt_ iiiga.,•• ' -1 •',,T. 4..'.',:fKi:::::: I t _ .. . >- • 1 •o c, 4• ° WASHINGTON -0.7. _ I F i.:. i i-J I r I ii: k .• ,Vis, Immr. - , ,_ nr.t• Omni . I' Vt ., -.'I... 1 a 471.1.tii Il..h.‹.ne..6 i._r..i.4,t_i•rt-••.I l.e I,,NtgiiI I:rt miiinIiIt,,,lt,i k Iilln1I111A1Ii nIe a-1I:)I I*°,Il::,.,g..•'eol,''2g‘,‘. ,,o,"i:..'.(1,,4mi•1..ol.\1s..ml1•.1i.n1i1mi n11b.1l.11.Wil.e.1l..1m•i.u1l"1 Ft.. tC,e„i14v1 i li. :;t0,5,,0g,,0 000.0°000000O6,•..F1 000,,,,C0..0..A °0o00 ,O°0,,O 0.°3„),1 00.:•°0100°.••.:.I0 •,0°. . V _.. 00. 0 .0. .':0 0I'.•o..- : 'N : _ _ o o o o o o . o s000s.1o: 1 k, , 0000000 . 0ii1i..-a1..000A0-1,1rl i )'• .:...•,•.'.':;.:•:.'::.:':..:.::.::...I::....;:.i:.::...i:.::.::„i:..::-i:.:::::i.::::i:.:::.:*::.::.::.:::.i::.::i::.::..:::.:::.:.::.:,: ••' -....-Ii.M....rh"...11 11 00.o,a, 0 0 0 0 0 . . . 0 . 0 .,00 ,, f; i41 .:,. "t ;a SSI0 . 00000 . 000 . 000000\ t- r.!,p.r, ,.. 1i.,.,.• 't '.m.. .1 m m I 1:94.A 1 g,ol olol 01 o:, "•'1n,• 0 0 0 0° °O MIN. -••:; a 1.0_0 0000. ',„, 0000 8 000 .3 ,. . .. 13_0 i.•*.4 ..,.' limm, ;,::. 0° °O 0° 0° °I.. 0 : 0°. 0° .:•:14 "NI r. ''' i•• 111111111111111 .=',, 4524ago,go '.„: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 q 0 0 0 0 0 0 ',,.', .k %aft ;.:1-,:;, 7itook.i. •mtillillAl.. 111 1111 . . min... f..gogogpg.• i00000eo , ov000, o ..,,s,ii., \ ::::. Al T6;AT2.11.g 1... ...r.imaiiiiiirred: 011,4t.,:pg.igicittoiti.:,:o:o:o: ;..,:,..: o:000 o:oc0)%000r..-:•;,7,3::‘,\:,,,,‘\4 .." •,',53' iii:./M1111.- 1111 ; 110.40 ,,::0000 :30Z . 14, 000 , .., cieg 00:: •,1 0 0 0 0 b 0 •';`,.'' \ ...la,,004000 lt,,,,0.o.o. .,4,..t,:...7_....:,1... 0 0 0000000000 * 1:1°0015,34;', • °o°o°c).111gthill 1°0°,3°o°6'.30"-::)1.4411 'F. No .00 000000 ti i 0000 $.: :?•IL___,.:u•••.411: -• p)Ao, o,;_copi co„,•1-iiiiity4,1 . ., „..,,,• ,o. p • 4 Al _ in Adilliallin hi&1k ..11/4 . :I:I Z go°000,0 01,00 00 00 00.!,k .,o.2 2, 11$91:t o o166o o 81 fifif AN III F.,... , ,,,... . ii .. 0000o0.0...ns,,,, ,.,..,„.„.•.. oc.00,0.0 „....,,,..„...„.•,,,,A„,,,,,, .......t.. 00,,,,o,,,go,„0.0t,V,.!'•',t',•;i'i ilkourilINVic,'::';N: 4 Na- . ' A: '0(---••...... Mill16.11tr. 'lir Tra;%‘:. .i ' • , 11111 , ,,.......,mc::::::, .., .:. ••• itirii ggogogrrf4.: •:',4, 1. IN:11.,-,i,•2 ''II*Ar Jr/gka. 1:4.:.,:,•*.:,,,,:: , •. ., 1.--•,..1 ..., ..1 . 2,0„.gogo .01.- :,,,:.1.* ,•„., 4111 III I 1,,...cr, . :gr:oo.;g4.43.0131-14:01....„%. If AMR A i• ..:. .• 0,.;.. . ,,.. . 11 Ijairixacere r•'-. 1•77 -gill 0TIALVan'Illirdia4111Will ' - •• -0 )ft.;:•'' Vitg;t4ir---421.-Plgiliffilta7f0-. , qr.l. tglipliiiiirW.1! . 1;-: ' .0:4.°0004 ....L, y .3, silly'-v-t t,I me • ,.000,4,6000,!. ., J:-..: .„,:., -•,,,,,,v 11111W110P. --‘ - ,,‘ , - 7.8 ,mi-,•-,:,-.;000000g0 :: ' .8 mic.41400,44104.•• f .1 o' .. f '''''43,v!,, Aliiiiii gggASE'4'.4):.':jil:::IirribVe;feie....'1":1 ; ',11•;,.• - :1- I ....000C, . 111 1 FL . -. 1,11111.:,,r* - °:°''..:411-:4lisatilibmil S' to 0-o.,../ "i' 4 4 :: :4 '4r'''.:. ?: ..:dingi :::i:i::::.'-:.:''..''•;-°.(e.:":...(73•-,..-•- ' - 111111 ' i "lira Mr.'-61"-""""r•*°° .. :: :', ....4..11,M1g.....,.... . •,........ _.,... . :Agginimimi9,,,,i.:.\-,T.,-,:4.,„",,..1\ - ki.,-.1.111.‘___--.T.--zozonIPIE.441114,91.:fe -•.,;'-:-.. 44'.---."4.4*:.`D... 1:::;0::Vgi::... . ),„', :.‹.'.);,•Jii".-:1'' '',i:c..'''-.•0.., Iv 'IV Alffrkt!!!!ele,Marime1Millialinut.a4 Je-0-.:.,,f6 e, , . , -",„‘,S4•-•::.(1 c;.? •.,.1...F. 'erM.I..":".344111111::::::Uniiiir ,4:r.%7ji'; '.4SS.c.r.b:a- 1. '4.7:j.r e.;;': ,,"!,., •..0.0 fr.ev..-(f, M...t-„;".:'_,.4, i:i:i::: :i: Mi: ??...?.,:).;;', ' __-_-_-___ ,:. %,;. ..•„,•..3‘,4, 14,, "INWIllkgrkilill!!!! •\ 0:'<I^,••:,•,-4-:re,',•,":''''Vr5 1:11**N„,'''/, itfii::::NO: ?1,4".•,' ' ------------------ .;.,'••••• ,71•11.4,z..- i•-•- ' 4, ..\., • .4... , 11..i. • s „ct,,.'r, „ N ;,...ehr$sq.. \I. MMu,..,, ki,1111•1111 glegr;;;.",„1:11,*ME Ogg :;-:. ' ..7::7---.7,,,:. --=-::72--27:-__' 7'.,''''::::ii. ;:::inniiiiii:i.::•:•:::::::*:11.11 `' ..!',..:::'A‘,.,: ':,,4.4.'Le'Z'.. '\Mil ME 131.1217. ,e.001 42 k Mig:),,,74 r '4?'1‘1) '-'.e"'15'r.°5 ., '"Ar =•:•• -0 -4,111.:•1:.....:,:::::),;—::::::::•;1•Plip'r: tut4;:r.le•te,?,.al ..ii it . Av;....,..g,•,, ,, ,...-,. :,---..-.74,-,.;•:!::_;_--,;,- . ...,,.,-- pp 0 ,.- • ___________ . ,- .........4„.., „ 1,,„*,„,.:::**.t.Aio:i,,,,, 1 ad,' -_-_7,-,otitzer--...I:" ••••••ilvinmorialt:MWI'Mle:i Am.!.• ' ,,,•,?, .01.,•03-1 ..•....-4 Ek.'........e.r..r. 1,p,-414,1! - cr , . -..:,) ., -,::i,,3,p..•. -:. . ___ ___ __ ___, -_-iiii 1 lir fiiisin,,, 0 ii.4.....".e: .A ,.0000c: ':. -141crielf0-' •.°0°.°0.... ,------- --- ---_-_-' -_=-2.-.= -_---- ---• 11.4....1 'eg mg nnnn c nnn III. ‘000c“ ...“......,.,... r•-• - .000000.0000,0 1:- prunsur scams. :ogo ::n , 1 • i' ., .0„0.000., .,•:,.z3,•aki,,,,.;:,;:k 1 .. ..:•••0000, ,.4.,,..:0.;:.3 ,..,..!:..... ...0000,0000000,00.0'•,...,,•\_-_--_-_--__:_:-.-:= - -17- •--- --' linumma.000 2,--71;"nnn'' ,i, -. imessi PrNe'°' ...:1P.•(.6'kq.t--;..''. i.f.: ,,0000.3.0000%00o0o0o, .:-,:•.._-_-_-_-__i-=-_ __: iminTilltillitrialestaini mmmmmm i, ,,,, ' .,,,.,..,...i., 111 ,. „ . -_-_--.,„0po op000009,0.y.,- -_::: --:-. '-- ..;'.c.:I.'... ,.` r'tc'•••-(.‘,C3r,.0.t?e.i. • ,..--;,..-,.Plir.r ."-I i I zr if /..:5.::::::::•••' '4.9,,. ,,, ,-,.,....,q.. ,". o :„I• :" 6""A, 'cry;r 7::-• ‘,.......-_::_,:-00000o0000%00.3%cgro•. • -_T_-_-__r_ }Ai. ,. ...:....:.:...x.x.........--,c,•--...,v,,:.-.,T.,: 7,., ; e°•i 1:- ‘•,or::::::.::::::::::::::::::::.. ) f.3.1.,..9', •,.... ..-• , .1../.- .- . R.c..t.-eN:C..,• 'WI 4:.0°.,?.0190,- 4)4:00„. ' 7,:.-- -:, 0, •...Th-.... . tt,..1'... v W - 'eta.Q.Vn cs n n'Ir8..iiSi;',17.K.CPYM•"1.: 3..to..,'''.--- - .1_•-..:, - - . ;'::.; : -7 :-.. ;:0 i'',..10,5] i 1-26... 1.1 I 17 i /" (- , [R.4 1 ,q'.�,� -1 :-a wl// /1 ' • / ' �_ ` \ 1 I I ril ----. ---1-11 EL-h--%-"---11: F. -1..:' t-21_--4 a / ''.•71/ // s ,\ p 1 1•""•-•,....,,,,........,4.. t 4, • , ., 1 t_T� c17. !/ 7 1 i : LIKE. l / r. s.. \ \ �j 4,,-+ • w . .z 1 —�,:;/ RTY / �,'� wa' \�© �]t d„ '� _,. .�\ MTOLIVET 1 ,e s 0 4 2_ F r m CEMETERY • ' • `YT �// PAQK 3P/ �v��i (� CEDAR RIVER t +,,,� / �11 r, I PARK kx�; 'i 1. I�,� / ' .' _ ��JJ 'ti '4''1'' - ram" p ;:414f I !!1 > ' W'*I''Ta t µ i xY \ \ ,- _ , . Will ©p \,.. „ N • ..1. '"-...,. \‘,:\ \ d 1 `� , \ B�f W .9�.r_ i'- —. r 1 ..\ \'' ` 1 • • bi —_1-•--dl/, -1 ,\ . j -- -1 - RENTON COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-049-87 VARIANCE: "V-050-87 SHORELINE MGMT. SM-010-87 APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON, PARKS & RECREATION TOTAL AREA 18.5 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY & HOUSER WAY NORTH EXISTING ZONING P-1, PUBLIC USE o EXIST ING USE CITY PARK PROPOSED USE PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A 36,000 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-USE INDOOR RECREATION VACILITY. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN RECREATION . • COMMENTS A VARIANCE HAS ALSO. BEEN APPLIED FOR TO DELETE SOME OF THE REQUIRED PARKING _THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR THE REC. CENTER AND A APPLICATION FOR A SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT HAS ALSO BEEN APPLIED FOR. 1, ftfo CITY OF RENTON utilc BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 24, 1987 • Terra Prodan Washington Department of Ecology Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504-8711 RE: Renton Community Center, Files SA-049-87, SM-010-87 Dear Terra: On July 13, 1987, I received correspondence from Barbara Ritchie questioning the placement of the Renton Community Center near the Cedar River. As we read the City of Renton's Shorelines Master Program, this project does "fit" in this location. The environmental designation is urban for which the objective is to " . . . ensure optimum utilization of the shorelines within urbanized areas by providing for public use, especially access to and along the water's edge and by managing development so that it embraces and maintains shorelines for a multiplicity of viable and necessary urban uses" . (See p. 22 of City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. ) This section goes further to state "In this Master Program, priority is also given to planning for visual and physical access to water in the urban environment" . (See Section 5. 04. 01(D) , p. 22 of City of Renton Shoreline Master Program. ) Thus, in looking at this project which is set back over 200 feet from the water's edge, it is our opinion that this project "fits" the proposed location. The project will enhance public's use and enjoyment of the river area. The Park's Department has provided plans to enhance the area within 200 feet of the water's edge with landscaping and trails. The proect will move parking areas farther from the river's edge and attempts to tie the building and river activities together with the banquet/dance area located on the south side of the building. Finally, the City plans to provide linkages from this site across the river to the trail system proposed along the south park of the Cedar River. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Terra Prodan August 24, 1987 Page 2 If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 235- 2540. We will soon be sending you the shorelines permit for the project. Sincerely, Dona K. Erick on, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JSM:csb:dskl LtProdan • CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 18, 1987 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M. : COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES VIII LTD. AND KOHL EXCAVATING INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN: Application to rezone approximately 3.53 acres of property. from G-1 to B-1 for future commercial use. Property located on the west side of Rainier Ave. N. at the 800 to 900 block. File Nos. ECF-086-86., R-102-86. KOHL EXCAVATING INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN: Application to rezone approximately 2. 60 acres of property from R-2 to B-1 for future commercial use. Property located between 87th Avenue South to the west and Rainier Ave. South to the east in the 800 to 850 block. File Nos. : ECF-087-86, R-103-86. CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT (RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER) Application for site plan approval, a variance and substantial shoreline permit for construction of 36, 000 sq. ft. multi-use indoor recreation facility. Property located at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway. File Nos. ECF-046-87, SA-049-87, V-050-87 and SM-009-87. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING August 18, 1987 APPLICANT: City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department FILE NUMBER: ECF-046-87, SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-01087 LOCATION: Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Application is for site plan approval, a variance and shoreline permit for construction of the Renton Community Center, a 36, 000 sq. ft. multiple-use indoor recreation facility. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: City of Renton 2 . Applicant: City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department 3 . Existing Zoning: P-1, Public Use 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: P-1, Public Use, B-1 Business Use, H-1. Heavy Industrial 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Recreation 6. Size of Property: 18.5 acres 7. Access: Maple Valley Highway and Houser Way North 8. Land Use: Cedar River Park 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: West: Interstate 405, Liberty Park North: B-1, Business Use, Vacant: Proposed Hotel Office, Restaurant South: H-1, Heavy Industrial East: Heavy Indust. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Original Town Plat Original Zoning, P-1 1953 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: i. Utilities • BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PAGE 2 a. Water: A 24 inch water line serves Cedar River Park. b. Sewer: An 8 inch sewer line serves Cedar River Park and goes into the main Metro sewer. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: Transit line 143-912 along Maple Valley Highway serves the site. 4 . Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A ' c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: Proposed Community Center Site is in Cedar River Park. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-710: P-1, Public Use. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Cedar River Corridor Strategy, City of Renton, January 1986. 2 . Central Area Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton • Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986, pp. 61-68. 3 . Community Facilities Objective; City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986, p. 24 and p. 63 . 4. Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986,p. 71. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department has applied for site plan approval, a variance and shoreline permit for construction of the Renton Community Center, a 36, 000 sq. ft. multiple use indoor recreation facility. 2 . The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-significance - Mitigated on June 29, 1987, with the following conditions: a. That traffic mitigation measures for the project be drafted and included with the record. b. That the issue of drainage and protection of the City's aquifer be mitigated to the satisfaction of the Department of Ecology and the Public Works Department. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PAGE 3 SITE APPROVAL REQUEST 3 . Section 4-738 (D, 1) lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Approval application. These include the following: General Criteria: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as "Recreation" to which the project fully complies. In terms of the Cedar River Corridor. Strategy, the project will certainly enhance the stated objective of focusing on the Cedar River as a unique community asset since the proposed Community Center is oriented towards the river and will increase the public's awareness of it. Whereas the Strategy calls for the extension of the Cedar River trail system farther east up the river, one might have expected to see the trail system extended along the subject property at this time. That is not the case. Apparently the City is awaiting the recommendations of the Master Trails Plan. In terms of the Community Facilities Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Plan, the subject proposal is in general compliance in terms of maximizing use by encouraging a variety of uses (the facility includes a gym, racquetball courts, a banquet/dance area, fitness center, game rooms, arts and crafts rooms as well as a pre-school facility) . In regards to Policy 3 . on siting the facility so as to be convenient and safe with access to an arterial, the project would appear to comply again, although access off of SR-169 may be difficult at certain times of the day. Since the proposed facility has been designed to allow for future expansion, presumably Policy 4. has been adequately addressed. Since the proposed facility is set back 220 feet from the Cedar River, it is not anticipated to have an adverse effect on the river or its immediate environs. Since the structure is single story, it is not expected to pose any access problems for the handicapped other than those already discussed above, which apply to all of the users groups. In terms of Policy 8. , the proposed facility would appear to be compatible with the Carco Theatre next door as well as the existing ball field facilities already on the site. In terms of the City's Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan, the subject proposal appears to be in general compliance. The proposed new Community Center will help create a system of high quality community .parks as well as conserve, enhance and improve recreational and cultural opportunities for the public. As noted above, the area of greatest weakness probably relates to Goal 3 . , having to do with maximizing public access to and involvement in recreational opportunities. Staff believe that the subject site, whereas centrally sited in terms of the community, is nonetheless severely impaired in terms of ease of access•. The intersection of I-405 and SR-169 already has considerable delays associated with it much of the time, and there is virtually no pedestrian access to the site now for pedestrians in the Highlands. The BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PAGE 4 straightening out of the "S" curves on SR-405 is also apt to exacerbate access to this site, not improve it, since vertical clearances will be reduced under SR-405. The proposal also complies with the Plan by being a high priority on the list of Community Park Development Priorities. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site is currently zoned P-1, Public Zone. This zone requires the reviewing body to ascertain and determine that "the general design and development conform with the adjacent surroundings, meet applicable building and zoning code requirements, comply with the Comprehensive Plan, and has adequate and safe traffic circulation and access. " The use. itself is a principal use. c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The subject proposal, because of its unique location between a major freeway on one side and sand and gravel operation on the other, is not anticipated to adversely impact its neighbors. Rather, it must do a lot to protect itself from these adjacent uses in terms of noise, dust, etc. The greatest potential impacts this project could have in Staff's estimate are to the City's aquifer and well system, which it is nearly immediately over, and the nearby Cedar River. The City's well system, if it remains at its present location immediately west of the site across I-405 in Liberty Park, could be possibly impacted by construction activities such as spills of fluids that might leach down to the aquifer. Potential oil/gas spills, sanitary sewer leaks and leachate from fire fighting are all potential threats to the City's well system that should be foreseen over the reasonable life of the project. (Note: If the City's well system is eventually located east to the Maplewood Golf Course site, many of these potential impacts would be mitigated. ) d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; There are a number of improvements which Staff believes could be made to the site or its immediate environs that should be considered as mitigation measures to the site, the adjacent aquifer, and policies of the Parks and Recreation Plan where this proposal is currently the weakest. These include: 1) That a clearly delineated vehicle separated pedestrian linkage be created between Liberty Park to the west and Cedar River Park under I-405, extending the City's trail system and linking this site to the City's civic center complex and downtown; 2) That a clearly delineated vehicle separated pedestrian route be provided between the proposed new community center and SR-169 along the north edge of the site to eventually link up with pedestrian access from the emerging residential areas to the northeast; 3) That a system of vehicle "STOP" signs be placed strategically along the vehicular BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PAGE 5 circulation corridors to discourage the existing eastbound, through traffic between Houser Way and SR-169. 4) The provision of a more extensive, possibly bermed, landscape buffer along the eastern boundary of the site to create a visual and psychological buffer between the site and the heavy industrial use next door. 5) The provision of more extensive landscaping along the west edge of the site to also create a visual and psychological buffer between the proposed and adjacent I-405 freeway. 6) The provision of a pedestrian activated pedestrian crossing between the site and the median in the middle of SR-169 to create a signalized crossing for pedestrians between the subject site and the industrial/commercial uses to the north. (Note: An existing traffic signal exists along the north side of this median that presumably could be signalized with a crosswalk here for pedestrians. It might be possible to create an L.I.D. between this site and the owners of the proposed new development to the north to implement these improvements. ) 7) That consideration should be given (if Traffic Engineering concurs) to creating a right- turn in lane (westbound) and a left-turn in (eastbound) for traffic accessing the site from SR-169. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject development is expected to have a positive impact on surrounding property values because • of its relative low site coverage, extensive landscaping, and a distinctive architectural appearance using both brick veneer, metal gable roofs, and the appearance of an exterior framing system to add visual interest to the large building. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; If items 1) , 2) , 3) , and 6) above under Item d. are implemented, staff believe Item F. will be adequately satisfied. g. Provision of adequate light and air; Because of the proposed new center's fairly substantial setbacks from side property lines (100 ' from the I-405 right-of-way, and 250 ' from the Cedar River, more than 300' from the east property line, and approximately 600 ' from Maple Valley Highway) , the site is assured of good light and air exposure. Air quality, however, has not been looked at. h. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or 4. unhealty conditions; The proposed community center has been designed so that no windows, other than a narrow clerestory window at the end of the game room and an east facing lobby entrance face towards I-405. This, and the use of masonry exterior veneers will help reduce noise intrusion into the building. Extensive landscaping BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PAGE 6 along the site's east property line could help reduce dust coming off the adjacent Stoneway Concrete site to the east. The introduction of "STOP" signs and possibly speed bumps throughout the vehicle circulation areas should reduce unhealty conditions resulting from fast moving vehicles "short cutting" through the site. 1. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; As noted above in Section D. Public Services, the site is served by a 8 inch sanitary sewer and a 24 water line. In addition, Metro's transit lines 143 and 912 which run along Maple Valley Highway serve the site. The site is also served by police and fire from the nearby municipal complex on Mill Avenue South. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight; The subject development, because of its large site, architectural refinement (modulated facades, gable and hip style roofs, masonry veneer exterior, and extensive landscaping) should enhance surrounding property values and help upgrade the surrounding area. VARANCE REQUEST 4. The applicant, the Renton Parks and Recreation Department, is requesting a variance to allow a reduction in the number of required parking stalls for the construction of the Renton Community Center. The Hearing Examiner has the authority to grant a variance upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: (a) That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. Staff's review does not support the argument that the applicant suffers undue hardship based upon site constraints of any kind other than possibly size - the site could not physically accommodate all the parking required at grade and continue to provide substantial areas of landscaped open space. Rather, the hardship here is that the City's Zoning Code, in terms of required parking, is excessive for multi-use, multi- purpose facilities such as the current park and proposed community recreation center, where events and activities are often discontinuous throughout the day so that the likelihood of all events or activities allowed occurring at one time is very slim. Section 4-2228. 12 does authorize the Building Official to approve a delay in the installation of up to fifty (50) percent of the minimum number of parking spaces otherwise required if the applicant substantiates the reduced need for parking and the space normally required for this parking is reserved. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. PAGE 7 Staff believe that this is another alternative the applicant may wish to explore. Also, Staff believe the applicant has overestimated the amount of parking actually needed on this site. For their existing Ball Field, they have estimated one space for each 100 sq. ft. of the whole playing area rather than one space per place of assembly, not containing fixed seats as spelled out in Section 4-2208.4 Recreation-Amusement a Activities. Rather than needing 600 spaces for the existing Ball Field, Staff estimate that only 100 spaces could be needed here at the most, assuming a maximum viewing (assembly area) of 10, 000 sq. ft. Using this revised number, the total facility need, including Carco Theatre and future expansion, would be approximately 584 spaces rather than the applicant's estimated 1084 spaces. Since 154 of these 584 spaces are for future expansion, it would appear that the applicant could satisfy their parking requirements with 430 spaces now. The applicant proposed to provide 343 spaces now and 450 spaces later on after they complete their expansion. Since other avenues appear to exist that have not been fully explored by the applicant, including deferral of parking and a possible amendment to the parking provisions (Section 4-2208) prior to the future phase, and because no unique hardship attributable to the site exists, Staff recommend that this variance request be denied. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, Staff believes that: 1. The subject site plan should be approved subject to: a) The applicant complying with the mitigation conditions identified by the Environmental Review Committee on July 29, 1987, when it issued a Determination of Non-significance - Mitigated, and b) The applicant complying with the site plan impact mitigation measures identified in Section I. above. c) The variance request be denied. ?, tii.--J i,4#2907-•i i't.";1 Li_i_i_tf4 -,i in 7, 0 i,„,„3, ..,. , s4 ,,._t. :_tf, ill 1 qi.11, , ,,, ,,, i , --..,,,- .. ii �I ,I , a )f. : /� ,,; /" ' i 0.0 , , — . ' IFY/ / / . ' 1 4 1 P 4 ‘'l ,j % ctli I . h------71 -47.- ,.:- / // /1/. \7' /// '',,,, f ; /1/. .,, . L •••.I) I T. ,,/ / \\\) • R-��o10 'o 44411/ rr:� ,� W 1 e a a If r+a© 11 `, .., .. .„:,----‘,. ‘,) . ift 2,/p.,./v ..,<,/ RTr 1/ TY • , Z ii __________7 1—{� LIBF. i . ,�/ 1,, ,\ © � ' d„' _ „�JAirfES\ 1 1, �/ 'a �ti,,.` f-jjE ' Q f © I o� 11 r PARK /1Ay CEDAR ,�• -1- , / �Q � RIVER �' fi* � °y \ „�°' !/ ,/¢�' L. fir'•1 - r~ _ 04°,//i/ / if 4- ...„..._ /0 / \' \ % ,}.,! y st Y � "? --n p i v e \� /- - --" n \ , \\\ 1 111 4,1—'4 \ . m.43 ' \ -, .. n. ii 1 .' qs f 1,.." , ter, - .,y, "--,,... -.... ..`..`•,...-._.•,....,,,,,,,,c\,,• .16.-. 1 • il- '3 i.._,____„_zs, ✓ \ -. • ,. z % 2 :--1, ,r ,:I '2, -1 \\3°' i G— 1 - --- u i l•: ,, ---, . L1 _ 11— 1� -1. <o , . RENTON COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-049-87 VARIANCE: "V-050-87 SHORELINE MGMT. SM-010-87 I APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON, PARKS & RECREATION TOTAL AREA 18.5 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY & HOUSER WAY NORTH EXISTING ZONING P-1, PUBLIC USE EXISTING USE CITY PARK PROPOSED USE PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A 36,000 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-USE INDOOR RECREATION VACILITY. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN RECREATION , COMMENTS A VARIANCE HAS ALSO BEEN APPLIED FOR TO DELETE SOME OF THE REQUIRED PARKING THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR THE REC. CENTER AND A APPLICATION FOR A SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT HAS ALSO BEEN APPLIED FOR. S j 11 1 i. 1 SE UP! LAND USE ELEMENT 1 „ 1\ iit NOINIIIIIII . .40. t•••s . I • ..... • I • • .•,„ -,4 El Single Family 1 MMMMM.. Commercial ,••;.( .1 ,' St , • . . . _ •••/.;.,..::iiiiiiii' ;,,,,ME, 76 t'ST .•:•,•.:.:...:•....• * .•:•:•:.:•:•:.:•:•:.: Low Mul Deti-nsFaitymily 1 .. y•;.:,,,,,,,:.: •• . • .:::; :i:•::::::i*: r 4.11" . ,:.:.:•:•:.:.:.:.:.:.' i •fifice / Office Park 1 ,,• .i.labii....,::::,/, ,t.1 i......,.:.:..:., , / ••••• Gi• • 1 ....•••• . r, Now :•:•:::::: 'Amp now ••::•::-:.-:.•:. .E.:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:. Medium Density 1....0..........: a ,,,.::::::::::::::.„ •-.1,1„. 1„ 4.;:=Em.1 ;i:i:•:;i:, ._ _ --I Multi-Family :.09,0o000000000000000, .9 oo,s,oo.p 0 Public/Cluasi-Public i , •••::.:.::.:..:.•:•..:: 1.:...r/NI NONNI •:::::::::! f;:::?' .,a, • -Ili,. ma ins•••, ::::::::: if 011/4..*:VM ou• .&.. 1.% :-wi:ft:.:4•:ki: in igil uensity ,.., •,„II . ii, CO00000 .4 1) 1 0••••11, 0;0,4 ,....... Light Industrial I Av.-4 Multi-Family ,•..•..• 1 e 1.1/4.,.7`•t../1/4 Recreation i°0° ° Heavy Industrial '' ;/ `611 • :09 ! ,Ye •1- -., •'•:".:7.1.',.'-;&-- ,M, ,i.).. ,e• • a,./ •7; .. si:.uc,4,•': Greenbelt Wianufacturing Park • , r . .,„ 4::. -, '‘.. L.. 1/4'.•c!(-: -..e." ; i "' . •'...... i. / Multiple Option /7' .1 / i ..,•-: ,,t, 1 ,5,.'f.-:-.:•,% • * RIM „,••-e • •:;,.- 1 .s . ,.-:,., ••,..:.._, - - A 1111111 4 ,-,„:. ..- •-•,...?:.--4,4:,-.T.::6..,y,:::: Revised April 1985 i . 44:V1, ' -c,;•:,-tV,,, ,„;:, ,, 1 11111111 "... .'"1/4.5••%-,i; '"C'''.^- • • c %. 4iN414r., ii^ \. °•,,,4'QM ' i .t.t\I•liO•i?- 11 • 1/4,,,ii.:li!;!4, I A [.1 . , 40::?, • Isim , ,, ._•. T.: L. ..,..... , ' - , .. . - LAKE 4,:•:44, II „ ti V i -, -I r;, ! be . . .• :1 , . ...#.°.$.'?•;11,t litit i: .. • oi •... Am 4 ' .' " rissi 1 • ( ! 110 i bill. i 0 o •=. . .! IN . .. 0 Mili... • 0- - _ 0 o - 4-I,. • . -M1.0 t IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,:•:.-f:;:.: Ella\ • 00 .0000 ...-,..,- ,.. ,,.. . .. - - - .11111._111111IIN .,• - ,7,000000000000/tf .,,,t, „;,... , i:::::::i.:.:.:;.:.•••••• rillikili..„_Cl: ik ..--'• ' r•4 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,4 0 0 ,',.;‘, :".-,...*:::*:*:•zrr"' - - . 1t :c, ‘ .----,..-r:o e o moo o o: • 0 o ,!,.i ' ,,..:iiii!ii . 1,!:.:" ,...c., 00 i r t,ogo:04 ,o0.......0... . 00 . %. 0 '.: ', i:fr...p"...:.:.••':''....:I V.-.F;. , ,.,........ 111 411111 P.-•-riNEmm• 11111.0000.Man alki" ,.,302,0:p. 0 0 0 0 o o 0 ilk, 0 0 0 . • ii, 000000 0., 0 0 0 0 0 0. Pe°0 0°0 oP0P0 %• . iiii!igi f.•r-:r- ::. .300 . 0 oo • f , „•.:.:.,:.:.., ,.., ,i,,. ,•:•:•:.:,:,, 111[11":ggi:min t.:siii,,g,ce., ;.„0.0.0.0.0 4 0.0.0.0 4.0.0. .00°.,c: • :mi an ;.!,...., •.., "PNITI.:11ffli 111 16 .. Nu. ,-..:,I, F)oo,,goggoogo.At,o eiv-6 0. 0 a . 0 . . 0 0. . :, , i NI •. Cit. :Itill LIN ,,, , -.1111.11111111.01111. it'llt.:;i05,115.1.0107ii,,,,,::0:0:0:0:00°43:0:0:0,:•0"0:0:0:00t:,r,:\ :`'.., %IF, .2„,;. ..., . . 019 11:8;,;80.000.,,,„=ffin . .„.....,.. „ , 0,01,1g,,.A,00.000. ,: . 000 00 0:0 60 43 00 0•,:9,",,i..I., 1 00 fit21, PP!. .111.;0;..14$1L111111111111 I.;..004.1hrfpg....k. ra,-g:11.°.eoPoPoPo°0-",,.."A r;.- /- 106."..4111..°.?g°..1 1 4.'7110gIgiog'ig:. .,, . 4:.- aliatti ,*..1 ii--v. - 00.0*limosenol' w Ng '' .32)1/4tggktgOg. . o 0 0 pir-•=4:1;. =-=,i'llre.t. eV 4; ' ''0 • .,,j,*iiI0 . . : ,.- 1/41,...11/ ,000poo000 ., .. +0 I 111.1:, o o co. o q 0.• ,,„,ta , - . 1,1„,„ ::: .,..0.0. 0 000,1i•..,•.•.II m . , . 00 ._. . ::.:.:.11;:0000.03,00,0009.00,.. ,,,, ,,,0,20_000.0..,L. ...____....,_ . 0 i , PTO....• ; - . • _,. ,_____1 k.iAit,:gggeggo.4, st .40, ,,,-,,,,,,,--,104....T- •......Q. ,, , r. • .,..Jr,T4 „4 j Cl,„ ... ,..•, '::i'-:::li:ocilo°05gogig°g:g':'1**Ci:::71'pi"?f=if lirilror so Arj . *"' ?' ... i ,,iMill . i •!r - . Brai`,11117 gp,-mem ,":...... /Milt•finff,1' '4.4'? 1 is s 11 I 'imp'00.0gOoM..:*??1,140kiiiiii Rilif 1. •••••'•' 020:' ,'`. !:.;•: • 0 0 L.\ • i 0 0 0 0 0 0°0° °°°..4• • "..\ "Ns .111. illes111..? r • !..• •,L.0„.°0°O...f.i,,,,*.„A, VI , .r...4 111:16,1117 All .,rai::-...-1; ':,:. ",:::.; I ! ;,ogogggoo 1-' .2.•°,-....,..,`?•' - ''''.".'' ' ltiiiiiirit:14%**: - "`ii `,4-iiimmilittrisai.1*ill '124PAGnee. 14"' -,. ik•44•41.. 1.moll low-..,r14 of•, i #1;110.A.clittiMilm, ,;(41:11191azowiPlor df • •,7:0`6%°...f..•:'•) dor, •#"' . ...., • ............., ., I a-. . •0000 ,:••..! 71‘•*.-,i'-' a••••?,(404)1MAIINNI _ ..•.0•0.0•I tiliMiNg./.4701111"IF'- / ' 4 '' 0 "IV lif• ,,,•• •IN • '''' -•,..„••••A•,.;.-. ',h., -"IIIIIIIIIIIIV, ...„ a, ' * ti:11:1'.0.6°M°2°g 3).-Iiiiiiire-.- 1.:>'-,-1. '''Vit-A 'sl • 11 L i :,...°0°0°0%.: ' 1111411. 473. ,..:.. •,:?;, ' . . , -,'' ::::!•.iiiiiih„„:i.::::.:...:3.),0,•":"."„ ,n...O.-('72•g"..,.,;:. .fir ,k‘ liit:11.844#11.1iiiiiiitiii;iiiiiiiiiiityt,dillifl: 36:44444itv,; iik;:.1..Pe 1 '-' ::i:i0i:i:i:i:i:i*i:i*M:i:i::::-:•.....• .,f':d•c",,,•1:43,:••••,\* -... ::::*i*::x:i:::i:::i*i:::i:::x:i:::i:i*::::. r..,•-•RI....,• •• %, ,, 'fr. .-.."'-u- •---,mak..f,', .„' '•*4 n::::::::::::::::::::::::::: • •‘,.',, "7.,,, • P.•,..••.; •.:.. \4rit 0- unnows.....R.N -• • •••,:,•••44••• • ... - . 1,-, ,,.,..,.. ,. .717PIL-•7:00(741:4111111iiiigifi2rik -'3`. .''',..'‘ . :','''sV:6-.1:,c;:;.: fl' b.bc'...'-'''.'' :100i:::: :t,i-4.;°C7•C'' '._-_-----=7:-=-------- ..‘1.;::•••:::-:*Si . _.. '''.1 ' r MMMMM..,),:".... (pagan InEr.k4.....- . . . o,o s f;.., , .:,..:::.7.:87_,,..,.z.:11.74t141::•::::.,:/,:i.7:,,51., ,.. -'ke-...7.cs••( '1/4•Imitm`u :::::::::!:::::::::::::::::. -ill- --------------------- • '''•%::::•:••••••••••i'77.".:::!!:•-•.wfvfs -,, 1/4 ti .g.p.....„,iti „„.......,,, • .-.,',-.c-0,..?.;f.„,,,,,,,,..,,...,,,,,,,,,.\..... ........., ,. _...,..,.::.,.„.„:„. „. .. ., •• N.11. ••................. .... ....... . ...r.......r, ------ • ••,,•*.:.:;*:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::" LI,mmmmmmm woolior .-om:'-01/41: :.:' r' '''•it. • "1.•""i--' • . 4,A•.. --- ,,i......4,:: :,:i•::::::.,:li /11 '.. -- ,..'7.-•:::••7.-r• • ---- - _ - • ••••••••..i.e.ii;i:i:4 r 97 MiiiliEraitie ,o'-• 4. c.:.:41,-a.z1..,-. - • ---:: . --MFAV10-1-=---- 'ilk.:,,.....„...,..:: as, 'm I leik'VV.VeLlr ...-A.-,•-••••t:-...-•,....,, ,-,-. ptv-q-- • __________: - • -(1,, •,•.•.:4.,,„n,•.,.„..•...„,,, :--, „ ,,..1 4104.1$.3::4.,,,:, .....4 , ,'"-A . '' V:1)Itt,.,1.,.,•'C.,0,:',- Z1E1101E1 Mill it ''n.40;.IV,,,...ill ill '67 000 sammiessor'• 1 • .00. L.3i0,,..:: • -----MF15•0310- '09§'0V.. ,-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- _-__ __.,-_____. prammit:00. , .,••,....•:•,,-,....1,,,..-A 0 0 2 MMMMM NM. . , _________7_7.:. .00000000.V°,\,f.t.,_•'1.=711=7.7......2•_:•:i_:--.. _.....-_-_-_-_- I ..•1 if/111 IN III II II ti .eqo ‘, 1 • i ••>,-.e.',>•,.7,4'1:e...: ..• 1 . _:_:_:._:=100000000000000000 0 0 0. :._:::_::_:_::_=:_t 7 IPZ:71410.f.! INIMINIIIII WINNWT-off . ' 4 " t•' • ill t71:4,4tVe .41: .V:0.th.; ...• : . 7_._- ,•0 0 0 0 0°093°A93°P .....'•'7••7-.. :.:-..-'- .-....:-.:-:-..7--d ligi."1 lir • ''11 g III ,' ' •'.f..e- 146 " „„,..••• ' .r.I 1.•-t-r-:"1- -.41..•5> , o,',..:,zo.•. "; ' Of og:Ka'..,ov.A, • ,_____ coo°, A.,,:..',4 c,:-:----- Waif,• '0 ' ' ...':.:*- 1.2?);. ;.V'Yjs`:;:;:'i,: `V.'''-.4. .N."0.1.:4,;>At' • a 9:•,...,:. t• ci.0%Ix: 10,1k4. ..,...- -..,:.•'_,. '-, „r..,-s-1 • ,,,s.afr, .,p.. 0 o„,o.pe_el ::-J------- rcteillovV::::......eik Cr r, t-i-(---;:i,. •...-.--Ei , z•-•-•••••-:,...::::::::!:•% Renton • , . • : 4 Community ARAI/JACKSON . .. ARCHITECTS&PLANNERS Recreation Center : .. . , t . . . • N. \ „ -... . . . . , . -:-.... ...,...,.,„ \•\ :. -- . .-:: ,/' ,./. s•. = -...,•,.. \ NE .P K I' 1 DS z' -• '0,9sti 6 \ . . - • ATIKIt.1 / .- FIELm PAR \• - ' /64 SI! - ' /,,/ . 140 . • C \ ii • / .,.. , \ _,... .—..... 1 .'• -; )-77. '. 13Att FIELDS i . , • /if,/ l'• i / \ IN,ti' . • . 0 i kr. • .. /-.. 0... . „ ''', , 41, • r • :— .1; .-0, . --, , i •-,• Q04,.) • / ..g 1 0. .'..:-- ,:i•gt -••• , , •-••. . • r)- -. .? ° t.) ).., * . .4V,.. ca)<7// i° .-4,-...-.. • '‘...t.., .. - -•• .?,.. , - -: '..: 6 0' . • .:. .....6 • . : )4 --------- 0/ -**1•4'; PIIASE ilif'JP,,/,'''. -; •4 kerep,_, ' .‘.---... Ci-filVIMPN .*.st ' '.,08 fr•;. 1 "9 C0 S, 40. 0 0 ° . . • ....- 4,1,,...• ---...-:. v iC it EA I 1 J / CENTF t • ' , ... • <.\ ),9.,/.. .'' % \ \ '`‘.40.k A...,:::- 'i fit'<1 • ' .-:' • 1 ‘`Ak7;4-r. . ii, /Aft. - „). * at, • „ __ 0 w 0 . -.4w• . -..--- '' e'• -.._.. 0 t _... ,...--/.." . • -e ' ,;•.- . ,......\A..; •46-fee -1.,..---1,,, re__ /---- ‘1„.---,..--„,-,,,,..,, s- ::-7--":-.4kEACH\:ss i .EAT J.,„ •-;;-- •.,1,.a', 5====1 . . . ,..,....___. ---.--N• .',-.,.-,•,Z.•..‘.i,:'„0,\-k,-,..'s,-)„ .;•.•,:•••-,-:;5•,7 . ., NM o+- . . . \-_,, ,----,.........\...?" • ?. . - _ .,.. . = I 'I APPROVED L_IAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Li NOT APPROVED . r' . ), ) ( 4, ,• `�' / ` 1.-- / f. r __ ///!!!� ''r' R '` ter' /1 ---- -- ---4' 1-:---- .-\ -,...., •\ 1 c____( N.L, :i-.� is � •5 DATE: :9 7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1.:3(_:bc-� • ® APPROVED EIAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [MOT APPROVED ,—7-70 o& DC";, c---c-,c1,s,; c_j.(?.(1- ,L)(3---,--0---- /.ice c ,p.A L_ i 7,(),J ,% r f s� y/��- �J 7 - y,0✓C'r7`/C'�/U CJ A - / --,•. .'C -f42----_._-. DATE : <O _ 4 47 SIGNATURE OF-DIR -CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1Gt'C -e--C{' El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED --a---7 e2,62.::.....,--„--7 ,....--7.-- , ,,,,..9 . RE C E 0 V ED JUN 17 1987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. . lip %� -SIGNATURE OF DIREC — P,r` --"SENTA rr\,E ,I. VAI „AU,W ✓L1 (iIi IFII-IV I / 7J4 V .JA VIVA 1 ''t I "•.I ( y 0--i',((eit IL' ! /� /��C, a APPROVED E 'PROVED WITH CONDITIONS/ NOT APPROVED . NCC/) 1.4rLI7y ReCOcA nog Pt4,vs Fort SC -t'L Sr,vt»,. w.uu_- Pio wA(Bev'.o,a5 �, ALSo '1(c'o ra SeA+o . SCt of: A.o.0 s tb D,S.U.S 1UTlf!b' PRUBAL SUBJECT TO 4 F-o,� ,on®wvac. ,prl .•roe— ra4 � -__ ._._ 4so4-767E J' : TatES1 REE?'ENT-1•:"�.'Z iV® PRE- Iry ,a�u,rat- Alorecrowc Qaff..• ' ' LA1 E CO M ILSREEMEI;IT• -. .:; NA *row - wNA7 UN161.64....3 -.o. es •_Ce16y,,,c, SYSTEM ..,,,....: ..cZ ` SPECK 6�a' cpg•�AREA WATER ..- ft r-. •�, �Gf SIPECK A rS.SLEN AREA .•.� .':'E• • +. / -rrS`c�r SPE 1NI_ kl" f-Iy 'APPROVED VIATER PLAN -----ter APPROM Sit PLAN yE w. . _ .- .. � f _. ®V F KEPT. . . -._ .�_ 1 A5.5 g FIRE FLCr!ANALYSIS t r DATE: (i! / //cf7 . SIGNATURE OF wr _ IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE , REVI a0®Id 8/1982 - Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : cLfiNetiemetOn El APPROVED F1/ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED 0 - cre Ie1j access '•I/dncf'e1r/`�D-a//r-Oaci 6J /nee/ 1../1s",i uifr1- ��i 7,,,,„e„74.5 ($CGC tiJk i6y c.'.''N 0u�A/`Sl( 'l' ��Pc Ci;.ec - amdi.1fdir7 .L,,,e.._ ar" i L'e`l: ;,.. ?ice • /Q54r4,6 dfrt a//yu// e.fia'eeesS (/\,,m aiil9 Q r 5 - o�6 l t�1,“Ic.fie ^ �6 i r(S e - At o /i)a'2,ha/T �r•,- C �//Q(u 1%500 aPi lee • ail-ee A117,/hu1164 jie.- S , r-i:i la/- hp/rra076 9 Leit-eG' - / ;blA ,7 /6 o / 02a tijr e.>2 S'e.,C)c1, I 1 f, \Jj 1 Y. fIKT is (\. �.�►�.. `.f ; r , DATE o :1116: ' -5 .\\:?4'7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR THORIZED EPRESENTATIVE RB:VOSION 5/1932 Form 182 ` REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f • WITH CONDITIONS El APPROVED El APPROVED El NOT APPROVED J '-'6-3) '?'-----4-d-<--- ) e'n- ) - sti"--- a•-7.....4...,_ L...�. o--•- 2--2- X3y" i-l-- -- r r r L) N__ ��.v- ems ..' - _. Wit, ��. • S I CI g [moo ti Ctzli0 w��t' .. ', -..I''iti�'.'•'d'chtVia T.F. ... BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JUNE 1r, -1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; Ei APPROVED fl APPROVED WITH CVDITIONS El NOT APPROVED .1 d • DATE: r!a,• , J . eCt- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0 AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Pa,44/f Xecd /row APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS [1:1 NOT APPROVED /` drl /Ie 4071- iJ fo /'J .`mow 9 40 cz e �GGd c®m /jj U€J e dd,-e Coz � ( I l /es- ,c° P/e roi Q o t C 6%;//a✓- 4/ des— /ta 1 S 1,ekt,- ego �� d p��^�C . • 2. , 142 hei7 z®imeL71(wie- xve /)typlofel 6 e'eg e aoiz7e.--1 d /hc hem& am - . 3 , ,/O w if 7111e jli c �a / � . /2L1i /e //re a ew 60/19e. 7rD /-he Koda,c- if' ifev- DATE: 00? SIGNATUR/F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 7,4,he ) o s/A ,s/2e /G�e �l REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 .. .�.. - : . r - ..rr. .-.. ... L._,,..,.e,.. .,. �.._... ., n .....a c-.....-.,.. .....r_ .. ` 'a DS/Dsk1 ECF04687 CITY OF RENTQN DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-046-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-049-870 V-050-87, SM-009-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval, a variance and substantial shoreline permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. multi-use indoor recreation facility. PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department (Renton Community Center) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that' • it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C. 030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. • This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from June 29, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , July 14, 19870in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 h DATE OF DECISION: June 240 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 29, 1987 ///< // Ronald G. Nelson Larr v , Springer • Building and Zoning Director Poll y Development Director Richard Houghton Public W ks Director 1 DS/Dskl ComCntMM CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-046-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-009-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval, a variance and substantial shoreline permit for construction of 360000 sq. ft. multi-use indoor recreation facility. PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department (Renton Community Center) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property ,located at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway. CONDITIONS: 1. That traffic mitigation measures for the project be drafted and included with the record. 2. That the issue of drainage and protection of the City's aquifer be mitigated to the satisfaction of DOE ' and the Public Works Department. 1 • 1� - NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMI- NATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON T ►p� The Environmental Review Committee AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION.A 1 ION (ERC) has NON- SIGNIFICANCEe for d a the following projects with additional conditions imposed as miti- gating measures under their authority of+ Au dray De Jo i e ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND REC- REATION DEPARTMENT VALLEY DAILY NEWS Application for environmental review to allow the aerial treatment of up to 65 acres' • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition of wetlands with Dursban 2 coated granules insecticide for moquito control. File No Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers ECF-043-87. are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND REC- REATION DEPARTMENT (RENTON COM- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published MUNITY CENTER) in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Application for site plan approval, a vari-, ance and substantial shoreline permit for. County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal construction of 36,000 sq. it. multi-use newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for indoor recreation facility. Property located King County. at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway.File Nos. ECF-046-87,SA-049-87, V-050-87 and SM-009-87. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Further information regarding this action %1 is available in the Building and Zoning Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in Department, Municipal Building, Renton. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Washington. 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hear- during the below stated period.The annexed notice a ing Examiner by July 31, 1987. Notice of - nvironmental Determination Published in the Valley Daily News July l 17, 1987. R2410 was published on July 7, 1987 E2410 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 24 .60 • Subscribed and sworn to before me this_2 9 tnday of u15 19_8 j • Notary i'ublic for the State of Washington, p residing at Federal Way, i ,l King County, Washington. w h ,,�-7 I • VDN#87 Revised 1t 86 r �l�� 1/ DEPT. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of udrey DeJoie NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the follow- ,being first duly sworn on oath states ing project under the authority of the Ren- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ton Municipal Code. The Applicant has completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND VALLEY DAILY NEWS RECREATION DEPARTMENT (RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER) • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Application for site plan approval, a vari- ance and substantial shoreline permit for Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers construction of 36,000 sq. ft. multi-use ndoor recreation facility. Property located are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published lighway; Files ECF-046-87, SA-049-87 and in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in King3 This 87. gKent, This decision will be finalized in 15 days. County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Nritten comments received after 5:00 P.M. newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. on July 14, 1987, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will com- mence following the finalization of DNS. TThe notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Cityhe mitigation measuresnviro imposed ey the of Renton's Environmental Review , Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in Committee are available at the Building and supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton,Washington, Phone 235-2540. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Published in the Valley Daily News June Notice of Environmental Determination 29, 1987. R2380 was published on June 29, 1987 R2380 - The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 21 .52 Subscribed and sworn to before me thid day of July 19 87 _ Notar Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, - King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 .. RENT I BUILDING & ZONING DEN WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET k.#11 , u RENTON ECF - 046 - 87 JUN A 1987 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-OIO-87 POLICY Lot Vr_L())M-1tT f1FPT PROPONENT : CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE : RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIENCE AND SHORELINE PERMIT FQR CONSTRUCTION OF 36.000 SO. FT. MIJLTI-USE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY. LOCATION : CEDAR RIVER PARK. 1717 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ; SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : E] UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT D6il( OF rrrNsil R E C E BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT JUN 1.6 1987 Ej POLICE DEPARTMENT g POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING/Wwmla OT. El OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 18, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f DAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH C VDITIONS EINOT APPROVED "6 — ny__ 'T.�� 111_..P G DATE: LC, 1107— SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0 AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTC f BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI DENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 046 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-049-87, V-050-87; SM-04D-87 PROPONENT: CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE : RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: "APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIENCE AND SHORELINE PERMIT FOR CON TRU _TTON 0E' 36,_000 SO. FT, MULTIUSE_ INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY. LOCATION : CEDA IVER PARK. 1717 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : [=1 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1:1 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ®® ri7_" ' `:7:17C g fi ; BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT t 0111 22ter ` POLICE DEPARTMENT 'd G;! LD NNG/ZONING DEPT. ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Li OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JUNE 18, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : PC�Nitt 7 /fee, 7t/o& El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /eLhdf l477e / i - /, ned S-D A Aar ite %ff ' J 41 e add-e1�1��. wr !l Me /04.-/ -V leq//e,- k `o‘-twg../e'eer me rd D fe/ Lix Ie`!f(a't C &la i`" / ✓L'/`_ z hq/- ohl4e -71 dre "1-6,0fe/ 6 e7L ' i'%e anet i!c heck a, - . 3 . ,t/d ' /7 fie 4�e P //&4 �- w fr ff,� o O " d1 e DATE : a//I f? SIGNATUR F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED_ REPRESENTATIVE �L7GA, S/lH�e ,®rc *e . l/l REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'ANENT . ,, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 046 - 87 , APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-049-87, v-050-87, SM-0'ip0-87 PROPONENT : CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE : RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER ' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 'APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIENCE AND SHORETINE MIT FOR ON TRTT -TION O 6 00O SO FT LTI-USE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY. LOCATION : CEDAR RIVER PaRK. 1717 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED .ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : EXUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ' LI PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT TON ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENci.T CE 0�FE N\\7 POLICE DEPARTMENTrp) ID ® 8 ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT �u�' 1987 BUclD UG/ZONINu uLPT. LIOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M, ON JUNE 18, 1987 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : UT//-/T y ��,16./1i.E,EieiNL.0 fl APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Eg NOT APPROVED NET/) usury get°c°1 no41 nL4.Ls FoL 5- &2, sro.tr-L w,rzca4_ /`.urn umrsz•"4s 15 ALSO aeo ro S&P, A Set ot= ,°u.,c S to D.S.W,S UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO _ T _ y r-, o o ' <- 4( -nos- yrtrt.m. ¢(o4-767z.. ��TE fN a OM)ri r. AGREEMENT-�b�.,Alt w.a� � D _�, IVoTc- .ate oK 4rtei. — rvuc-,3 To LATE IRS AGREEMENT-SE cR 11/0 Kaow - wimr u�ti 64. 2ou. * 74Kes C#6..0C4, -SYSTEM IEVEIIPMENT CHARGE-WATER I , f o G T 1/4/ k,ac' /PT SYSTEM IRVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER. iV D /� 'I = SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA GENE-WATER //p . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA GORGE-SEWER A/Q �-, APPROVED WATER PLAN y rS APPROVED SEWER PLAN 1PROVEDFIaErAL0cATi0NS E ;u FIRE FLOW Y85 / 4 ANA YSIS ND . .WJ. ddb OUR A. DATE: i! / /� SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 046 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-04i0-87 PROPONENT : CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE : RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: :APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. VARIENCE AND SHO F. ,INE PERMIT FOR CONSTRT _TION OF �6 OOO SO FT MULTI-USINDOOR RECREATION FACILITY. LOCATION : CEDAR RIVER PARKS T 71 7 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY TO : 1::] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Ei BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JUNE 18, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : c‘cea, le-tile4vt96 • APPROVED I ' PROVED WITH CONDITIONS LI NOT APPROVED ' � r� dJep71 C1CLess Artnier i"Q;//`dace[ 'nee/ ;�:. u�v�- Xiei if fe /lire/ze/If , s -acce 1a1f ,6y c,'ie ar5L� CXY a Mai 4/din ��e, c i-- Ae4 4/-n oa �a/ -s 1�l f5 ii - �� , 1;'-" e - OC' � �u � /36 /-Pn hett Ci Q/p1 i 00 a 1 /Ce u�i/-y . ku;7 i u�`/4 S oIe. C`i4Afe hyiretsi�5 /'e �CIit.eG/ - 46/7,-, /6d v2i`ei� e>4 570C9qt• CITY OF RE•• du %VON _519 DATE: C ,/ZONING DEPT. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR THORIZED(EPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPI 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 046 - 87 APPLICATION NNO(S) : SA-049-87, v-050-87, SM-000-87 PROPONENT : CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE : RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. VARIENCE AND SHORELINE PERMIT FOR C'ONSTRTT -TION OF 36.000 SO. FT. MULTI-USE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY. LOCATION : CEDAR RIVER PARK, 1717 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ELENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT L>> jit° Li4 17,3 '_. POLICE DEPARTMENT JUN 111987 ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OU,' D,NG/ZONNING DEPT. OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M, ON JUNE 18, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ti El NOT APPROVEDfox- /y/�7 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 - RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 046 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-0i's-87 PROPONENT : CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE : RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIENCE AND SHORELINE PERMIT FOR C'ONETRUCT1QN Q ' 36.0_00 SO. FT. MULTI-U BE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY. LOCATION : CEDAR RI3LER PARK. 171 7 MAPT,F VA ,T, . HT HWAy TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : LI ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : I1UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT crr t C RENTON LI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ,) ; bi H u 1 . ram` El POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 �; � JUJU 111 ? E POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CU1LDAC/7 LINING DEPT. n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JUNE 18, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ! �Agr/C F A/G/N 7 ,e1A.i APPROVED fl APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED I to O . c.,J u.,.- C h ej f Z '341 0 L7 S L, cx/ 4� Trvv/cz D li +1-t-() ci--)-4— .- _ '-s 7 --y I -°----L--+Y- --v‘ < 'e. E- /— 5-e..../67, (e2,1y- :q &„;10/04-4-e 0 \....„.\ ) \it ___ .--t. pgv4e '-'2�`er' DATE: . \\< SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 ,` Form 182 • RENT-1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPI 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 046 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-00-87 PROPONENT: CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE : RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: "APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIENCE AND SJ-iORELINE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF_86,000 SO, FT. MULTI-USE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY. LOCATION : CEDAR RIVER PARK_, 1z17 MAPLE VALLEX fIG iWAY TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION IITRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT DBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT LI POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M, ON JUNE 18, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : MAPPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED r o. j ,ipiv A1 pzv �4v. _ DATE: ep_' / 4' T SIGNATURE OF IR TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPi MENT .a DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 046 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-0f-87 PROPONENT : CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE : RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIENCE AND SHOR .T.INE P MIT FOR ON TR7 _T ONO 36. 00 S0. FT, MULTI-USE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY. LOCATION : CEDAR RIVER PARK.. 1717 MAPLE VALLEY JIGIIWAY TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : LII ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT E POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JUNE 18, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED 'PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED CITY OF RENTON . f11E C E I V ED JUN 7 1987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. • ae,-/-z DATE: 6 77 g%7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISIONS/1982 Form 182 i pF f • ` , r. i41 n i.+s r}2{ - rs �,✓ ;y- r• sE 1+"' t a + lk F� 3F% � f �•' Jn 1� t . ..... `" 9 CO' Sil}#' � ?,, ,T .;W'' Y 1k r„W' . . x ' ,.s„ ,r,.*,.},i1,x+�a,' r.•vl..'"1.". r{ ,� ;�$� O,gRTED SE PI City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner gill hold a Pr1 E . i ' ? t. a' t t •of d F k tr 4k y ut. ty [` ili0 (�; * `t] 5r rkl; ,a " • s�'Fyt�` �b 4f �,�7� ,s '"~•' 1 Mkt 'S'f$ ;., y'},d k,:., w�N. M ( �v. . •,t... ��{� • i+t . +y. �% t 'u �hr �`` 't fir r RS+' ' :. i,# F t .. $�Y kY ?h ti.ry.F fiY.. f•" {Y• 1 • ;.`i 3j[ r ! " �� k.9.• � Y ,} ".r + 3.at � .P iR "1 ' 'i • y.. k. � } 0 3. h.!. I ‘t��' . +di �I.1 t'� k Y Yf4 J*l eta . .+ t • ,f �y At r, f• "1�,1 rtt. �ll If + �w ', rl sry , f`�r a" • , r� i,.¢ rr„{�f ht � .. ,� 'j'�y ?• t, ri`r.k• t � • y�'..1. �� in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON AUGUST 18, 1987 ;E G I N N I N G AT 9:00 AGM - P.M. E"""-; f �',r ;e b- , ',Ili CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION 'DEPARTI T ' RENTON COHNITY CENTER • • • APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL A VARIANCE AND SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 36,000 SQ. FT. MULTI-USE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY. • • • • FILE•NOS. ECF-046-87, SA 049-87,•'V:050-87, AND SM-O09-87 • • • • • GENERAL LOCATION 4, '. /D AD RESB: PROPERTY LOCATED.AT CEDAR RIVER PARK, 1717 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY. • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT .235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE . REIM'!! VEO WITHOUT RROPEt . AUTHORIZATION_ iolk) DV-o --67 • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATI®ITT A LL BE HELD BY THE HEARINGUBLIC E ARING I EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND Audrey De Jo ie beingfirst duly sworn on oath stale FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASH- , y s INGTON, ON AUGUST 18, 1987, AT 9:00 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS; PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES VIII VALLEY DAILY NEWS TO AND KOHL EXCAVATING INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN; Application to o Kent Edition v Renton Edition o Auburn Edition rezone approximate B-1 l 3 forfuture acres o of proper- ial Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said news papers use. Property located on the west side of P P Rainier Ave. N. at the 800 to 900 block.File are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Nos.ECF-086-86,R-102-86. monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, KOHL EXCAVATING INC. PROFIT printed and published SHARING PLAN: Application to rezone in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King approximately 2.60 acres of property from County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal R-2 to B-1 for future commercial use. Prop- ertynewspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington the ton for theloc b 8v Ao due South to west an and between Rainier Av e.South to the oast King County. in the 800-850 block. File Nos.: ECF-087- , 86,R-103-86 CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND REC- The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition REATION DEPARTMENT (RENTON COM- Renton Edition X. , Auburn Edition _ .. , (and not in MUNITY CENTER)Application for site plan' approval a variance and substantial shore- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers line permit for construction of 36,000 sq.ft. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a multi-use indoor recreation facility. Property located at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Notice Valley Highway. File tics. ECF-046-37, SA- 049-87,V-050-87 and SM-009-87. was published on _kuu S t 7, 1967 Ft214 118 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zon- R— ing Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the PETITION; ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT PUBLIC HEARING sum of $ AUGUST 181,E 987, AT 9:CO A.M. ON TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Ronald O.Nelson • Building and Zoning Director a � � Published in the Valley Daily News August 7, 1987,R2443 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 2 t hday of t 19sa"j • Nota ublic for the State of Washington, • residing at Federal Way, ,� 1:,� -C, `, King County, Washington. 1 •; VDN NB7 Rewsed t 1 86 .� ! �1 i 1 ; 14. f` j 7T;t ft c n� pr. Lei cm) ti 0 CITY OF RENTON mu. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 5, 1987 James Shepherd City of Renton Parks Department 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: PUBLIC HEARING -RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER SITE APPROVAL 049-87 Dear Jim: A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 18, 1987. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Si ly, ot jcia Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:DB:plp:p5-011 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 j k HE/Dskl Pub8787 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON AUGUST 18, 1987, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: • PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES VIII LTD. AND KOHL EXCAVATING INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN: Application to rezone approximately 3.53 acres of property from G-1 to B-1 for future commercial use. Property located on the west side of Rainier Ave. N. at the 800 to 900 block. File Nos. ECF-086-86, R-102-86. KOHL EXCAVATING INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN: Application to rezone approximately 2.60 acres of property from R-2 to B-1 for future commercial use. Property located between 87th Avenue South to the west and Rainier Ave. South to the east in the 800 to 850 block. File Nos. : ECF-087-86, R-103-86. CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT RENTON '� COMMUNITY CENTER) Application for site plan approval, a variance and substantial shoreline permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. multi-use indoor recreation facility. Property located at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway. File Nos. ECF-046-87, SA-049-87, V-050-87 and SM-009-87. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 18, 1987, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: August 7, 1987 Ronald G. Nelson ' Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES. OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in , on the day of SIGNED: CITY OF RENTON Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division July 24, 1987 H Y'' 0.F- R NYC p 1 . ,J1.11 27 `;TO: Randy Berg, Staff Designer f �' �'d2 1 FROM: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Renton Community Center This memo is in response to your inquiry dated July 6, 1987, in regard to mitigating measures to reduce the traffic impact of the above-referenced development in Cedar River Park and possible joint mitigation measures with the project across Maple Valley Highway from the Park. Our recommendation is that a traffic study be prepared that evaluates. the following two conditions: 1. Access to and from the Maple Valley Highway considering access locations for development on the north side. Particular attention should be paid to storage and left turn capacity on the Maple Valley Highway. 2. Pedestrian circulation to and around the site noting specifically the crossing of the Maple Valley Highway and Houser Way as well as pedestrian pathways along those arterials. I / GAN:ad cc: R. .Houghton R. •Bergstrom J. Webley y RC Committee 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 - r. 0 Y 9- 6-7 Vi " tj-tee. ''-�• 40 . CITY OF RENTON PARKS and RECREATION Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor John E. Webley, Director July 23, 1987 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton Dear Sirs: Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the comments from the Department of Ecology on our proposed 36,000 square foot com- munity center. First, let me point out that the building in question as originally proposed, was 200+ feet from the river but we felt that the facility was close enough and significant enough to merit looking at its impact, if any, on the shoreline. The shoreline, in this case, is a concrete vertical wall caused by past industrial use except where we have created an amphitheater allowing for a more natural relation- ship between the river and its uplands. The building's role in our overall recreational scheme has two strong ties to the river and its environs. First, we have attempted to pro- vide support facilities for our many river trail and beach front users encouraging them through proximity to utilize the sanitary facilities within instead of the river area. Secondly, we have designed the building so that major pedestrian access ways are east and west limiting their immediate impact on the area and automobiles are pushed further away from the river using the building as a buffer, both visually and acoustically. The building also has strong aesthetic ties to the river as facilities in the southern portion open up the beauty of the river environs for public viewing. While it is questionable as to whether we really need a shoreline permit, we are sensitive to the environmental concerns of our shore- lines. We are, therefore, moving the building an additional twenty feet away from the river and will take every precaution not to nega- tively affect the river environment. As the committee well knows, 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2560 • Environmental view Committee r : • City of Renton Page Two we are committed to the integrity of our City's shorelines and have spent literally millions of dollars to secure some seven miles of river- front, for public use, most to be kept in its natural state, along with a ten million dollar effort to reclaim 11 miles of. Lake Washington waterfront from industrial degradation. It is my sincere hope that moving the building even further out of the shoreline area will address the concerns of the Department of Ecology and any that the committee may have. Sincerely yours, ohn E. Webley Director JEW:mc , tlTitf6' Director • as �e�S boy STATE OF WASHINGTON • DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 o Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 0 (206) 459-6000 July 13, 1987 17 JUL 141987I • Environmental Review Committee ENGINEERING OEPT. City of Renton • CITY!1F RE(VTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sirs: • Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for thtT construction of a 36,000 square foot multi-use indoor recreation facility at Cedar River Park (ECF-046-87) . We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. ---Although the project site is located in an increasingly ur- banized environment, we wonder whether this site (located in a shoreline of the state) is an appropriate location for an indoor recreation facility of nearly an ,acre in size.- If you have any questions, please call Ms. Terra Prodan of the Shorelands Division at (206) 459-6789. Sincerely, Eta/agazeL i-e.V.4..L Barbara J. itchie Environmental Review Section BJR: cc: Linda Rankin, Shorelands - " +i, i M.li`� Jne1 6rr�.4 • ,.,.. v'. (C. yA 7iE, `.. > 'a..Y ': .i��l i �a sa:: sir+ • { APPLICATION NO. ECF-046-87, SA-049-87, V-050-87 , SM-009-87 APPLICANT CITY OF RENTONt PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT (COMMUNITY CENTER) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, A VARIANCE & A SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 36,000 SQ. FT. MULTI- USE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY, GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS AT CEDAR RIVER PARK, 1717 MAPLE VALLEY HWY. • POSTED TO N TIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE • PROPOSED ACTION ' D DOES M DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL ► WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 1.5 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST ,BE RECEIVED BY • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITHjilltE3tEgr HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. • • DO NOT,-REMOVE THIS NOTICE • WITHOUT. PROPER AUTHORIZATION. c:\ • S -a q9-c527 scam Y��C O tJ ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director �Ha 18Bg a°y STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY • Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 July 13, 1987 01IVED JUL i 4 1987 � Environmental Review Committee ENGINEERING DEPT. City of Renton CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sirs: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the construction of a 36, 000 square foot multi-use indoor recreation facility at Cedar River Park (ECF-046-87) . We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments. Although the project site is located in an increasingly ur- banized environment, we wonder whether this site (located in a shoreline of the state) is an appropriate location for an indoor recreation facility of nearly an acre in size. If you have any questions, please call Ms . Terra Prodan of the Shorelands Division at (206) 459-6789. Sincerely, C atI2e/ A Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section BJR: cc: Linda Rankin, Shorelands a CITY OF RENTON ® , ' ;t. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 2, 1987 Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section - Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504-8711 To Whom It May Concern: Transmitted herewith are: A. Copies of Determinations of Significance for the following -~ prof acts: 1. Sabey Corporation, File Nos. : ECF-034-87. 2. Environmental Research and Development Corporation = -- (ERADCO) , File Nos. : R-008-87, ECF-007-870 3. The Austin Company, File Nos. : SP-113-86, ECF-094-86. B. Copy. 0f a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. 1. City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department (Renton Community Center) , File Nos. : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM- 009-87. C. Copy of a Determination of Non-Significance: 1. City of Renton, Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance, File No. : ECF-044-87. If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. Sin ly, Donal K. ERic son, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JSM:csb:dskl • LtDoe • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 a. r. , • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ' 'i'`ti a`NO ICE OF A �PUcATION F :`,,.:<<f::'.. i~��ti{,;NOTICE OF�APPLICATION FOR•:,:S;r;!;a SHORELINE MANAGEMENT;.: i • +v SUBSTANTIAL"DEVELOPMENT.PERMIT.,�;;aii i`'�''Notice,is;hereby:given that City of Renton Au dre De Joi® k Y ,being first duly sworn on oath states �rDepartment`of;Parks and Recreation has that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ,filed an'application for,;asubstantial,devel=. !� opment permit,for the'Construction- anal DAILY �y NEWS ,development,of an;indoor;communityrecre=,t VALLEY DAIL i 1�f E i+'�S ration.ceaple•located atHighway., ti in ec-,4 '17,17G Maple;Valleyr:Highwayswithin.Sec-; � Kfion(s) 17 of1Township,231;N;Range;5;. ^ • Kent Edition • Renton Edition a Auburn Edition • w.M in the;Cityrof,Renton0King;County;9.'1 eShingtonj.Said development is,propesed Daily newspapers published six (6)times a week.That said newspapers 'fii`lie within ttie:t' dar:Rive`r'and/or.its asso' are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ciated veers n :d .ng tO ex_re p$is oiive' Any person�desiring to express his•views".� months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published :or'.to be-notified'of the action taken on this:',; in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Ioningtion•:partniould;notify, nt if Renton.. ente Buildingu ipal Zoliing'�Department ,`,Renton,Municipal;; County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal SBuildin :200 Mill.`Avenue.•South,;Renton;',�a newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ;washington 98055:;in',writing of his!inte est:,`:` KingCount - - ;uvithirsahirty,(30)days.oftlie IasCpubtication•�.,, y• of.th is:notice_Publication;date,of this;notice;.4 ore'Juneil2.and June;19";1987.,,•'}_;,;•-:�':'',f'�•� Putilishedtin ttfe-Valley_Daily News June The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition 12'andi19;1987;R2333. .,::,:,,, ', ••' , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in • supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Not1r-e of _ApplU eati on was published on June 12 and 19, 1987 R2333 • • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the • sum of $ 314.k)i .••... a .t, g _ R.: •P,P/,]�� `_ t t.. i , 1;r, <1'l _ i i 'u.' r i-! •n^1�,,/ r._-��tlen • II ' l`I,I' ' �,' .f • 1,1! JUL _,.,11 it �, I.F ; UL161�ff7 111 Subscribed arid`swornto before me this. .bday of June 19� ii Li ` 1,1' ,t•' ,''C! 'd` _ryas{ f•,,'rf, �, DFPI:::. — , ,,r , .i ..,,„L „.... .....77/ ....---e---,!7/9::2 Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 i i DS/Dskl ECF04687 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-046-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-009-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval, a variance and substantial shoreline permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. multi-use indoor recreation facility. PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department (Renton Community Center) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from June 29, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , July 14, 1987,in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: June 24, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 29, 1987 //////r'' :// Ronald G. Nelson 7 Larr . Springer Building and ZoningDirector Po1i y Development Director Richard Houghton Public W ks Director DS/Dskl ComcntMM CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-046-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-009-87 ' DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval, a variance and substantial shoreline permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. multi-use indoor recreation facility. PROPONENT: City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department (Renton Community Center) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway. CONDITIONS: 1. That traffic mitigation measures for the project be drafted and included with the record. 2. That the issue of drainage and protection of the City's aquifer be mitigated to the satisfaction of DOE and the Public Works Department. i' 0 ' ' ''1. re ' ' :, ' r 1 A It j f a e t ó' a`- APPLICATION NO. ECF-046-87,SA-049-87,V-050-87 & Sri-009-87 APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT(COMMUNITY CTRO PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR PLAN APPROVAL VARIANCE & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE PERMI A 36,000 SQ, Ff. MULTI USE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITl GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS CEDAR RIVER PARK, 1717 MAPLE VALLEY HWY. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES R DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL J : WLL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL, NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 1.5 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JULY 14, 1987 AN APPEAL OF THE. ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NotofEnvirDet/Dskl Pub71787 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON • The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Application for environmental review to allow the aerial treatment of up to 65 acres of wetlands with Dursban 2 coated granules insecticide for mosquito control. File No. ECF- 043-87. >(CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT (RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER) Application for site plan approval, a variance and substantial shoreline permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. multi-use indoor recreation facility. Property located at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway. File Nos. ECF-046-87, SA-049-87, V-050-87 and SM-009-87. CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Draft ordinance to establish secondary containment and facilities citywide. File No. ECF- 044-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by July 31, 1987. � I Published: July 17, 1987 A • • YELL.O' 3 . NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFIANCE-MITIGATED for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant has completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT (RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER) Application for site plan approval, a variance and substantial shoreline permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. multi-use indoor recreation facility. Property located at Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway; Files ECF- 046-87, SA-049-87, V-050-87 and SM-Of0-87 This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 P.M. on July 14, 1987, will not be considered. A. fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental _ _. Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Kv Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, Phone 235-2540. Published: June 29, 1987 ERC6293 DSK 1 • OF RA, t$ ® Z. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR MEMO 0 � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 � 04rF S D EP1E•te,4P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: . June 23, 1987 TO: File FROM: Jerry Lind, Land Use Inspector a51.• SUBJECT: Land Use Fees for Renton Community Center - City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department, File: SA-049-87, V-050-87, . ECF- 046-87, SM-0O-87 The following land use fees have been assessed for the above referenced project and have not been credited to this department. 1. Site Plan Approval $ 392 .50 2 . Variance $ 150. 00 3 . Environmental Fee (Based upon 3 .7 million value) $ 430.00 4. Shoreline Management $• 970. 00 TOTAL $1,942.50 JFL:csb:dskl • Memofile ERC/Dskl ecf04687 BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT June 24, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department PROJECT: Renton Community Center ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST:" ECF-046-87 10 APPLICATION NO. : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-00S-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval, a variance and shoreline permit for construction of the Renton Community Center, a 36,000 sq. ft. multiple-use indoor recreation facility. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway ; B. ISSUES: 1. Whether the new center is designed and sited so as to minimize impacts of noise from I-405? Discussion Noise, from the nearby I-405 corridor will project over the site and proposed civic center building. The building materials together with the lack of windows along the west elevation should minimize the noise impacts from the freeway. The new freeway design may help reduce some noise clue to the shifting of trucks through the S-curves. Traffic noise will have the most impact on the banquet/dance area which may be used as a meeting room, especially if doors are open to the terrace area. In addition to traffic noise, the site will be impacted by noise from the Stoneway Concrete facility. Since the craft areas, offices and banquet/dance areas face toward Stoneway, noise from the plant will be a nuisance to center activities. 2. Whether adequate provisions have been made for pedestrian access both to and from the facility from adjacent areas? Discussion Two natural pedestrian linkways exist to the north and to the west. The northern pedestrian linkage would Building and Zoning nL.nartment Environmental Review •mmittee Staff Report ERC/Dskl/ECF04687 June 24, 1987 Page 2 connect the park with the motel/restaurant/office building complex proposed immediately north of the park property across the Maple Valley Highway. The western linkage would connect the park complex with the Cedar River Trail and park facilities in Liberty Park. People will naturally move from the park grounds to these areas. Steps should be taken to ensure that the existing crosswalk linkage is kept (and possibly upgraded) and that a solution be arrived at to safely get pedestrians back and forth across the Maple Valley Highway. 3. Whether the proposed use is compatible with the adjacent land uses or vice versa. A major conflict arises between the park activities and proposed community center and the Stoneway Concrete property with its concrete mixing facility. Until the Stoneway site is redeveloped, there will be major conflicts, especially with respect to aesthetics, noise, and dust. 4. Whether sufficient information has been provided with 'respect to the traffic impacts of the new facility? Discussion The checklist states that there will be approximately 700 vehicle trips per day generated by the center. The checklist does not provide any measures to mitigate the impact of these trips on the adjacent corridors, especially the Maple Valley Highway. The major access to the park is from this corridor which is moving closer to peak capacity as development occurs east in King County and north/northeast of the park site along the bluff in Renton. Traffic Engineering suggest a measure to direct traffic by providing right and left lanes. 5. Whether sufficient information is provided on the impact of constructing the community center within the most sensitive area of the acquifer recharge area? Discussion The checklist does not address this issue at all. The fact that we are adding more impervious surfaces (including parking lots) over the acquifer raises questions about whether the City should accept additional risk to contaminating the acquifer. If the risks are accepted, then what precautions should be taken to minimize contamination of the acquifer and nearby City wells. Building and Zoning "n?t,artment Environmental Review >mmittee Staff Report ERC/Dskl/ECF04687 June 24, 1987 Page 3 Utility Engineering has requested more information. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Environmental Review Committee withhold making a determination until additional information is provided on solutions to minimizing the traffic impacts and impacts on the City's acquifer recharge area and City well site. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Probable minor impacts noted for public services with the following comments: Request burglar alarm system. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impacts noted with the following comment: No major impacts noted. Design Engineering: More information requested on utilities. Probable major impact noted on recreation and public services. Minor impacts rioted for all other environmental elements. No further comment was made. Traffic Engineering: Probable major impacts noted for recreation, transportation and public services. Minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements and the following comment was made: Park entrance leg of intersection to SR- 169 should have right and left lanes marked with lane line and pavement arrows. Utility Engineering: More information requested on public services and utilities. The following comment was made: Need additional information because of aquifer and well protection. Parks and Recreation: More information requested on recreation with major impacts noted for both recreation and aesthetics. The following comments were made: 1. This project will have a positive impact on recreation for the whole Renton community because it will increase the recreation opportunities for all Renton residents. • r Building and Zoning ] artment Environmental Review _�mmittee Staff Report ERC/Dskl/ECF04687 June 24, 1987 Page 4 2. The center has been thoughtfully designed to coordinate architecturally with the existing Carco Theater. 3. A landscape plan is necessary in order to evaluate how the Community Center will relate to the Cedar River. Building Division: Probable minor impacts noted to earth, environmental health and housing. No further comments were made. Zoning Division: Policy Development: More information requested on aesthetics and transportation with probable minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements. The following comments were made: 1. Additional landscaping should be provided in the parking lots along Houser and Maple Valley Highway. 2. Additional landscaping should be provided along the property line between the Park and Stoneway to buffer the project from the adjacent heavy industrial use. 3 . This department is concerned with the traffic impacts created by this project, as well as the access off Houser and Maple Valley Highway. 4. An effort should be made to extend transit to the site. 5. This department supports the requested variance for a reduction in parking spaces; however, this department is of the opinion that the requested 450 parking, spaces (total at project completion) is still too high. J rt 1z OF R� •10 . ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT j - c RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 90 Pam. 9-77.FD SEP1.°3 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH • k MAYOR MEMORANDUM ., DATE: June 23, 1987 TO: File FROM: Jerry Lind, Land Use Inspector 4 SUBJECT: Land Use Fees for Renton Community Center - City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department, File: SA-049-87, V-050-87, ECF- 046-87, SM-008-87 The following land use fees have been assessed for the above referenced-project and nave not beeif credited to this department. 1. Site Plan Approval $ 392.50 2. Variance $ 150.00 3. Environmental Fee (Based upon 3.7 million value) ` $ 430.00 4. Shoreline Management $ 970.00 TOTAL $1,942 .50 JFL:csb:dskl Memofile n V i17 ? ' lid ' — 1:1191 / /'.' I • . - R-4 # -,., .---.--- -,ftr •P.,, I - -:4-dry,!_., i4 77- 1,, ::_-_-_::,;1„g_4 �t _ S�T7. .L \ y„ ? Htii-,' _r 1 lah. i 4 i k tid4 G- 1 ''. LIBERTY \� d e G m CEMETERY o PARK \/ �\ P / CEDAR RIVER , _ \\ P3 PARK .. .— silo-* \ \\ _ j ;-• H- 1 !TTH4iiiik , SNI t� — \] - 1jTrT1 ` . Bimi 1_-41 .,--\---t"•),-_?i- - R-_-_,-,U-r,..:.-,-_-,,-3—'..,4,"--------__7-_i4-0-.4-.-'',,-- \ -' ,, 1 ,,-,.,,'.:i,.,—,--__-..,L.-1-„,,,'-.,--,...:..-_. __I,'.1,';s\v. '. 5 — - . \ ' ,.„. • _ -----,7--.._._,.__ ,- 1: ---r---,.i j , 1 ,-, • „ RENTON COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-049-87 VARIANCE: "V-050-87 SHORELINE MGMT. SM-010-87 APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON, PARKS & RECREATION TOTAL AREA 18. 5 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY & HOUSER WAY NORTH EXISTING ZONING P-1, PUBLIC USE EXISTING USE CITY PARK PROPOSED USE PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A 36,000 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-USE INDOOR RECREATION VACILITY. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN RECREATION COMMENTS A VARIANCE HAS ALSO BEEN APPLIED FOR TO DELETE SOME OF THE REQUIRED PARKING THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR THE REC. CENTER AND A APPLICATION FOR A SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT HAS ALSO BEEN APPLIED FOR. 1 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL. CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Zo1n th9( DATE CIRCULATED: June 4, 1987 U COMMENTS. DUE: June 18, 1987 EFC - 046 _ 87 101 solo-b7 APPLICATION NO(S). : Sk 049-87, V-050-87, -5M-069-87' PROPONENT: City of Raitnn Parks and Recreation Department PROJECT TITLE: Rentnn Community Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval a Varience and Shoreline Permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. LOCATION:Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway • SITE AREA: 16,5 ,1 R , BUILDING AREA (gross): JCDICX-X05a 1F'( IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: TO Ulsert�`( ' I(/ G' c4 6R.® Gko peporK Div tAi\kivo pRou060 tTU R l c oMOW Q TW WoNTI-1Yv\ LPL \IIAJGJ ii(D14km�j PRNA° \,e4AYI ) )41611GA Y5 yVet&I1 I+c0,0 c \) UisikoscApirao (361 m flow pkoru6 UP AA., 1614- A8 W iTh iroiejmoio a GiN1vc PLJ. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of D'� ctor or Authorized Representative Date 11111V h 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PGA s DATE CIRCULATED: June 4, 1987 COMMENTS. DUE: June 18, 1987 EFC - 046 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA 049-87, V-050-87, SM-00-87 PROPONENT: City n f RPntnn Parks an Recreation Denar o t PROJECT TITLE: Renton ('ommunity Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval a Varience and Shoreline Permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. LOCATION:Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION ' IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air r�f^'1 3) Water G .� ft? :? t.? 1I V7 4) Plants ,,., r�'NY�r,;1 ,�YF; f. 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources L.UrLa JG/ZONING DEPT. 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics K 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: /ki "tip-4-74- w� < A&C d. fo1// /4/10$a� a� ve'd/ 4-- '- 7IAe r.A.-ha/ dew t®4,-.`7btA1 f�, hel&C/e / f w./l Pl° e the re crea7Lcor r 41// /r 1% "ecY'dd'i7s • cr th A1Lc // 0kiirweei �G a•"d/-hSS¢c as-chi fe'c /,/ GcJ/YL Me e')/ 7 <� 7I/ trailer; We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0/4/4f 9 Sign re of ire tor or Authorized Representative Date 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PoI<m F' ieK l 1-r✓ yt DATE CIRCULATED: June 4, 198 COMMENTS. DUE: June 18, 1987 EFC - 046 _ 87 Li u - �ENT®N APPLICATION NO(S). : SJ� 049-87, V-050-87, SM-0�0-87 ,HIM A 19R7 PROPONENT: City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department PROJECT TITLE: RPr1tnn Commiir i ty Center (3:'VFLO MP T nrrr BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval a Varience and Shoreline Permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. • LOCATION:Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth ./ RE C E II \ �E 0) 2) Air ✓ JUN 16 19:7 3) Water V. 4) Plants V BUILDING/ZONIN DEPT. 5) Animals ✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources V 7) Environmental Health V 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing ✓ 10) Aesthetics V I ) - 11) Light and Glare V 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation V 14) Transportation V � 4 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: LL--e-- t7;-! Ats:J::(-:!:: 7- 'tt: Gc GL "to— --- 1)1,11re,1 =1=1— rate) 7rt..t� .fil.d�C ?�- %. A.o �/ 7 -c___ /LAN-A-12-st-c-X-o Gt."--.04--1-e-vt- . 7€442A..*L.170.11.,=.. ....d.__4_ a.Q__ -_tom-c.. We ve reviewed this pplicat with pa icular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. i 1(p, 1d,s i— Signature of Director or Au prized Rep esentative Dat , rNig ,4111A, , 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: UnG(r1e:e_Nrmo, DATE CIRCULATED: June 4, 1987 COMMENTS. DUE: June 18, 1g87 EFC - 046 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : Sk 049-87, V-050-87, SM-0f-87 PROPONENT: City of RPntn ks and Recreation Department PROJECT TITLE: Ragton Community Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval a Varience and Shoreline Permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. • LOCATION:Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air !/ 3) Water ✓ 4) Plants ✓ 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health • ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓/ 9) Housing 1/ 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation ✓ 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: • C TV E:.SNTON f r ' Ju111987 uEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ‘#/667 Signatdfe of Direct or Authorized Representative Date. n U rim ..._... , 21119 ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST,REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: June 4, 1987 COMMENTS. DUE: June 18, 1987 EFC 4446 4 19847 APPLICATION-NO(S).-: Spi- 049-87, V-050-87, SM-00-87 PROPONENT: ( i eation Department PROJECT TITLE: RPntnn Community Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval a Variance and Shoreline Permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. LOCATION:Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air / 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics ' 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities � COMMENTS: k• 6 � "rya P/s CITY OF i; :;C. • rJUN 51987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is nee ed to properly assess this proposal. • 11 Signature of Director or A orized 'ep'-sentative Date V • 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U-Iti1e5 DATE CIRCULATED: June 4, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: June 18, 1987 EFC - 046 _ 87 . APPLICATION NO(S). : Sk 049-87, V-050-87, SM-0f. -87 PROPONENT: City of Penton Parks and Recreation Department PROJECT TITLE: RPntnn rommupity Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:. Application for Site Plan Approval a Varience and Shoreline Permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. LOCATION:Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation_ , 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: NCB° °l9 m7 oni,Ac y irlo,2 ,ot gEC4us6 OF ,detcar z. q- til L. erfOi6G7 4f CITY OF RENTON +� )tea II W �5 JIM 3 1987 BUILD:NC, I . We have revi—es this application with particular attention to those areas we have expert' e in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional 'nforma on ; needed to properly assess this proposal. &/ h7 I, Signature '7 Director or Authorized Representative Date 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (2Ace , DATE CIRCULATED: June 4, 1987 COMMENTS. DUE: June 18. 1987 EFC - 046 _ 87. APPLICATION NO(S). : SA- 049-87, V-050-87, SM-0A9-87 PROPONENT: City of Ranton Parks and Recreati-an Department PROJECT TITLE: Rentnn Community Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval a Varience and Shoreline Permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. LOCATION•Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: /f -v-o 7 NO jol11LCP CITY OF RE TO JUN 17 1987 • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informati is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ftkikrAirol DATE CIRCULATED: June 4, 1987 COMMENTS. DUE: June 1R, 1gR7 EFC _ 046 _ 87. APPLICATION NO(S). : S/i- 049-87, V-050-87, SM-000-87 PROPONENT: City of Renton parks and Recreation Department PROJECT TITLE: Rpntnn Cnmmunity Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval a Varience and Shoreline Permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. LOCATION:Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources _- 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional formation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Si at e..of Director or Authorized Representative Date 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I YCs.ATICc, DATE CIRCULATED: June 4, 1987 COMMENTS. DUE: June 18, 1987 EFC - 046 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : S 049-87, V-050-87, SM-Ok-87 PROPONENT: rite of Rantnn Parkc and Recreation napar_tm � °o o�vi� o�yui ouieni; PROJECT TITLE: Rentnn r.ommunity Canter BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval a Varience and Shoreline Permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. LOCATION:Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air �/- 3) Water !--- 4) Plants 5) Animals v� 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare / 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services � • 16) Utilities COMMENTS: PE, r k e,frA -f'v- a. c.e ( e_ a -F I '}e r s c-f-"t oLN fl s e—t.6 `• � CT"" 0, RENTON i.: t j3 15j �N��,�.� k`' JUN 111987 . � OUILD111G/ZONtNG,uEPT. We have reviewed this application with/particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or uthorized Representative Date 1 . �i ` V CITY OF RENTON ,yt BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director June 5, 1987 Mr. Jim Shepherd City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Community Center File Nos. : ECF-046-87, SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-010-87 , Dear Mr. Shepherd: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your site plan, variance shoreline development, and environmental checklist applications for the above referenced project. Your application has been routed and tentatively scheduled for the Environmental Review Committee on June 24, 1987, to consider your environmental checklist. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact Betty Grimshaw of this office at 235-2540. Sincerely, Oa-6(2d K. Donald K. Erickson, ATCP Zoning Administrator DE:BG:cb:Dskl LtShphrd. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 ARAI/JACKSON �\ ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 1535 IIth AVENUE SEATTLE. WA..98122 (206)323-8800 Date: 2/60,a_ 1Pf, Job No: �jGZ Project: Xe:RXI LR/ Ceifirot/. n'y Owner: Contractor: • To:V 'LAftieni kee 41„"ffiestein Sd Cl. W4 9&fir,-. Gentlemen: We are sending you the following: 14 ErPrints ❑ Shop Dwgs ❑ Originals 0 Specifications ❑ Samples ❑ Dwg No No Copies Date Item ZG,icc. * -r24R/, . Luc/ /�/. For: ❑ approval/cam ents ❑ coordination ❑ file ❑ corrections ❑ fabrication per your request ❑ estimating ❑ information ❑ Remarks: If this material is not received as listed above please notify at once. ��Y. o �''TTY OF RENTC T. FILE NO(S): SA 041 -8i ,e v- 06c-a-1 is ® + BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTRh=n1T �� 4o--0 � _u ‘ PCB-067- . .,,,,,c) MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES CITY OF RENTON 0 REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* RENTON 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE mgSITE PLAN APPROVAL i G1Z 52. Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 235-2560 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON E' VAC From Section: -22A * Justification Required 15000 NAME ' JAMES SHEPHERD ; ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH 0 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT RENTON 98055 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE 0 FINAL PLAT 235-2560 0 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: .0. } CITY OF RENTON ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH 0 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL RENTON 98055 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 235-2560 0 Residential 0 Industrial 0 Commercial 0 Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS ED 1717 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY TENTATIVE PRELIMINARY r. o EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING c,`' L J_ FINAL a° .:e, MUNICIPAL PARK P-1 ° ,;i. PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: , ,. /'_ COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER NUMBER OF SPACES: �,. „00 : , ,. • lag ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEt;;..CCa 4I,rTF.'C ;. 4 5 Qa SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 35,000 18.5 a 7 Yh;Man alb€, TOTAL FEES e____O r;S*„: c;-; ----.-, ,STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP W (1-1 L`;, . r,-a f� ! ' APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: APP CATION DETERMINED TO BE: , U�'�' ,J I 3 V L_ Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: E •.... ....ii .v,,,,;. "-PT (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 6 4 `6 7 0 Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: E Building r(jai Design Eng. pa Fire En Parks IA Police EA Policy Bev. ) Traffic Eng. jI Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). f , AFFIDAVIT JAMES SHEPHERD , being duly sworn, declare that I am Elauthorized representative to act for the property owner,[Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY . OF J Wyx 19,. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASH!N'G I ON,,r RESIDING AT • •• eym__ 4.e (Name_:cf N ta•0PuL iic) Signature of Owner) • p� . 11 r )e h ue S. 200 Mill Avenue South (Address) `e,,Cn, (4 ggos�— (Address) Renton Wa 98055 `(City) (State) (Zip) 235-2560 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." . • Foam #174 • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION - CEDAR RIVER PARK That portion of government Lot 4 lying in Section 17, Township 23, Range 5; together with that portion of SW 1/4 of NE 1 /4 of said section 17-23-5 and that portion of SE 1 /4 of said section 17-23-5 lying between Columbia and Puget Sound right of way and Renton-Maple Valley Road; and lying northerly of a line beginning on the westerly margin•of said Renton-Maple Valley Road, 80 feet northwesterly from the south line of north east 1/4 of said section 17-23-5; thence south 47°-52'-00" west a distance.- of 273.22 feet; thence south 88°-26'-00" west a distance of 251.95 feet; thence south 39°-24'-35" west a distance of 73.20 feet; thence south 27°-52'-20" west; less a portion beginning at the intersection of said southeasterly line there of and the southerly margin of said Renton-Maple Valley Road thence northwesterly along said southerly margin of Renton Maple-Valley' Road a distance of 60 feet to point of beginning; thence continuing northwesterly a distance of 100 feet; thence southwesterly parallel with said southeasterly line a distance of 225 feet; thence southeasterly parallel said south margin of Renton-Maple Valley Road a distance of 100'; thence northeasterly a distance of 225 feet to point of beginning. 1 `.�.h a tv; ' is .'1 3 • OF R4, 4'• �, EC F: 16Cl-cam-g i 4'v 0 It% z City of Renton LU: ��_�o -61 \/ -050 n `nm-cxj19 -g1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 94TEo SECA"' Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental Impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide Information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) • and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonprolect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Community Center 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton Department of Parks and Recreation 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 200 Mill Avenue South 235-2560 Jim Shepherd 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: Renton Building & Zoning; Renton Hearing Examiner 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction September 1987 -- September 1988 t • ✓. .. 7. Do you have any plan r future additions, expansions, or ther activity related to or connected with t..., proposal? if yes, explain. Yes, possible expansion for sminning pool and multi-purpose recreation space with required additional parking. • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit; Site plans approval application. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Building Permit City of Renton Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit City of Renton Site Plan Approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway (Carco) 17-23-5 at intersection of I-405 and Cedar River. (legal attached) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); CP rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 10% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. sand & gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No - 2 - a. Describe the p se, type, and approximate quan ';s of any filling or • grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. none f. Could erosion occur as a result of' clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. no g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 37.7 % h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: • n/a 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project Is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. dust b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? no c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: none 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Cedar River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. no 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or • removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. none - 3 - 4) Will the pro ;al require surface water withdra s. or diversions? Give general description, purpose. and approximately quantities if known. no 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. no 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the . type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. no b. Ground: • 1) Will ground water be, withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general 'description. purpose, and appaoximately quantities,if known. . no 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems. the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. none C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?. If so, describe. drainage from parking lot and roofs discharged through existing storm drainage systems. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. no - 4 - d. Proposed met- ;es to reduce or control surface, rr-.end, and runoff water impacts, if an. Some additional storm drainage, on site retention as required. 4. Plants a. Check or circle typ- . vegetation found on the site: pi deciduous trees alder rallatt. aspen, other la evergreen tree• 1 cedar,i0L-', other N Shrubs pi grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 100,000 sq.ft. of-grass will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. n/a d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: new landscaping anticipated including interior parking lot landscaping. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbir other Mammals: C •ear elk, beaver, other Fish: bass salmo. rou herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. no . • - 5 - . d. Proposed mE res to preserve or enhance wildlif( _- ' any: n/a 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove. solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. electricity, natural gas, lighting, heating, cooling. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. no • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: insulation, insulated windows, building orientation, energy efficient mechanical systems. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals. risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,. describe. no 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. police, fire, ambulance 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: none b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? traffic noise from 1-405 & SR 169; Railroad noise; Stoneway Concrete-- yard noises. - 6 - 2) What types a evals of noise would be created 1 ,r associated with the project on .port-term or a long-term basis ,.or example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. construction noise, increased traffic. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: none • B. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? concrete mixing site to the east developed municipal park 1-405 to the west b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe. no c. Describe any structures on the site. Carco Theatre, 2 restroom buildings, 1 picnic shelter, 2 pump houses, Flouridation building. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? no e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? P-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Recreation g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. no i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 10-12 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: none - 7 - 1. Proposed mi ires to ensure the proposal is cor lble with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: none 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. n/a • b. Approximately how many units. If any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. n/a c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: n/a 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 30' brick, metal roofing b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? view of Cedar River Park from freeway c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: none • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot lights, exterior building lights, would be used during evening hours of operation. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? no C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? none d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: none - 8 - 1 � 12. Recreation a. What designated and Informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? swimming, fishing, picnicing, athletics, active and passive. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. no, existing athletic fields to remain. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Facility will provide wide array of additional recreational opportunities. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for. national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. n/a b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. n/a c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: n/a 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access off Maple Valley Highway and Houser Way North. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? no, ± 4 mile c. How many parking spaces would-the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 383 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). perimeter road for emergency vehicle access only. - 9 - e. Will the project. use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. yes- BN Railroad passes 100' west of park. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. ± 700 trips per day g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: n/a • 15. Public Services • • a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? • If so, generally describe. • fire, police • • b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. if any. fire resistive construction, sprinklers, supervision of recreational spaces, site lighting. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site: : _ atural as - ele. one am ary sewed, sep is system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. electricity -- Puget Power; Gas- WNG; Telephone- PNB; Refuse, sewer -- Rainier/or other local vendor; water/sewer -- City. C. SIGNATURE the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ,\ C ,r Name Printed: (; Jc.ar,OS E• merkerr9 • - 10 - #176 11-8-84 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHE FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS - (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and �,. programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater Intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: - 11 - 5. How would the propos— 5e likely to affect land and shoreline use. including , whether it would alloy encourage land or shoreline u incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify. if possible. whether the proposal may conflict with local. state. or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE 1. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: - 12 - PROJECT INFORMATION: 4. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) 1717 Maple Valley Highway 5. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : On file 6. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands : Cedar River 7. Current use of property and existing improvements : Municipal Park 8. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY and proposed improvements (be specific) : Municipal Park with Recreation Center 9 . Proposed construction costs and schedule: A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project include additional developments contemplated but not included in this application: $4 million B. Construction dates (month/year) for which permit is requested : Begin September 1987 End September 1988 10. List any other permits for this project from state, federal , local governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and number of the application or permit : Site plan approval •- City of Renton _Building Permit - City of Renton • ITEMS 11, 12, AND 13 TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL: 11. NATURE OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material , such as sand, gravel , mud , clay. rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any) : t ��M \ 0398Z CITY OF RENTON Building & Zoning Department (206) 235-2550 SHORELINE MASTER APPLICATION APPLICATION FOR: OFFICE USE ONLY: Application No. : Si"\--CO' E 1 14 SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT ECF No. : PERMIT _ SEC-TWP-R: I_I CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Date Approved : II VARIANCE Date Denied : Publication Date: II EXEMPTION Comprehensive Plan: (__.1 REVISION Zoning: Water Body: e y'STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING 'Date Receiveds .i 4'' Ia Application Received By: �. C.1 3 -1 q7 Application Determined To Be: r., a Accepted o Incomplete -vs,., =T, Notification Sent On: By ( Initials) : Date Routed : Additional Material Received by: - Application Determined To Be: ❑ Accepted o Incomplete Notification Sent On: By ( Initials) : In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The Building and Zoning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application. APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1-10 THROUGH 14-16 BELOW: INFORMATION: 1. Applicant Owner X Purchaser Name: City of Renton Park Department Lessee Other Mailing Address 200 Mill Avenue South Phone: 235-.7S6n 2. Name of Property Owner Cit ry of Renton Mailing Address 200 WI Avenue South Phone: 235-2560 3. Contact/ Consultant : Jim Shepherd Mailing Address 200 Mill Avenue South y Phone: 235-2560 12. In the event th:.. any of the proposed builL_Jgs or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an, obstructed view. 13 . If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance, from which the variance is being sought . ITEMS 14, 15, AND 16 TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT: 14 . If applying for a variance or a conditional use, complete the variance or conditional use form. 15. Project Maps : Attach to application accurate site plan and vicinity maps . Refer to application instruction handout for map requirements . 16. Additional information ( If necessary, attach as separate sheet) : STATE OF WASHINGTON SS CITY OF RENTON ) I� Jim Shepherd , being duly sworn, certify that I am the above-named applicant for a permit to con- struct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and that the foregoing statements , answers, and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . (1-(//,--,41V S ghature Subscribed and sworn to me this & day of 9 Ai All /1 Notary in anti for the State of Washingt• residing at . It . FORM 177 ti ® CITY OF RENTON ( w LL PARKS and RECREATION Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor John E. Webley, Director May 29, 1987 MEMORANDUM TO: Building and Zoning Department FROM: Jim Shepherd, Facilities Superintendent Jr The purpose of this correspondence is to offer an e planation for request for a variance to allow a decrease in the number of required parking stalls for construction of the Renton Community Center. The proposed total number of parking spaces provided as part of Phase I development (construction of the community center) would be 343. The total number of proposed parking spaces when the park is completely developed according to the master plan would be 450. An analysis for the parking requirement for the entire park is as follows: Room Area Parking Requirement Spaces Offices 1300 SF 1 per 200 SF 6.5 Vending 150 SF 1 per 100 SF 1.5 Game Room 1000 SF 1 per 100 SF 10 Gym 12000 SF 1 per 100 SF 120 Racquetball 2400 SF 50% x max. 12 occupants 6 Child Care 540 SF 1 per employee 1 Locker Area 410 SF 50% (Area/50) 4 Fitness Room 2000 SF 50% (Area/100) 10 Banquet Room 3456 SF 1 per 100 SF 34.5 Arts & Crafts 1200 SF 1 per 100 SF 12 Kitchen 400 SF 50% (Area/200) 1 Storage 1500 SF 1 per 1500 SF 1 TOTAL CENTER 208 Carco Theatre 310 seats 1 per 4 seats 78 Future Swim Pool 7000 SF 50% (Area/50) • 70 Existing Ball Field 60,000 SF 1 per 100 SF 600 Future Expansion 8400 SF 1 per 100 SF 84 TR 1084 rs ',J '-� A 'numb',erjof areas appear to be questionable including the following: '= ' ij ` o i�a 'I 600 spaces for the ball fields is very excessive for the use. ( ' b. 70''spaces for the swimming pool seems very excessive for the actual use. • c. 4 spaces for locker rooms; 1.5 spaces for vending; 1 space for child care; 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2560 1 1 space for the kitchen and 1 space for storage; total 8.5, seems unreasonable in that these spaces are support areas for the main activity areas of the building. d. Existing parking at Cedar River Park totals about 205 spaces as follows: Carco Parking Lots 55 Field Parking Lot 80 Misc. Parallel Parking @ roadway (approx.) 70 TOTAL 205 spaces Since the community recreation center will occupy a part of the site, a reduction of this number could be considered for the Carco Theatre and the existing fields parking requirement. The possibility of using a number less than the 205 space as a "grandfather clause" should be considered. The ability to schedule different activities and uses between field use, community recreation center use and theatre use should also allow for a joint use of parking further reducing the parking requirements. The preliminary master plan of the park indicates that the parking capacity of the site would be around 450 spaces. In consideration of the above reasons, the parking could be reduced as follows: Total Proposed Master Plan Parking: Community Recreation Center 208 Future Pool 70 Future Expansion* 37 Carco Theatre 55 Fields 80 TOTAL 450 spaces * The total required for future expansion (84) cannot be accommodated on this site. Total Parking First Phase: Community Recreation Center 208 Carco Theatre 55 Fields 80 TOTAL 343 Both the proposed master-.plan parking and first phase parking includes the following assumptions: a. Joint use of parking can be achieved because of different schedules of activities. Also the staff will be able to pre-schedule major activities such that peak parking demand will be minimized. b. The existing site parking was used for the Carco Theatre and Field parking since the code requirement for field parking is clearly excessive. c. The location of parking will likely to spread around the site to accommodate the different users and for joint use. d. The 70 existing parallel parking spaces were not included since the community center does occupy part of the field area and no reduction was used in the community center parking. e. No reduction in the community center parking requirement was made for "accessory" support areas to the major activities. (locker room, child care, storage, kitchen, etc.) Given the limitations imposed by the site and the ability to schedule activities at alternate times. The proposed number of spaces of 343 (Phase I) and 450 complete Master Plan should be sufficient to serve these facilties. If you desire any additional information, please contact me at 235-2560. JS:sb 1 I = 4 i 1 MO +T 1 , 10l110• of - JL: a ma 1 '1 f .r - 1=1 a )1Fa ■Sr..Fi ft. - • t WPM,t •r f�.• • • 7`• s' Fa 10TF I,r • 5+= F L o - •'•\ Y Imr I. »!r i r 4a •F il,er..- ff�� .... i y 2 f 1ST. S1 MI w� u�lT� NlLteinr 9 w lulr '. 11T I.Ivr J. . a. S : sew i�"iel*"1 +{ 1 r"aIsrN.. I1 L' Ir' w•M. hf� �,,a1y+'1+'� f I•.rin. �1 7FL�,{ °>�i5! 14c1( —144A 541� ,r ' A. . Fre i ' wa ISM Sr .'.:Fuin:M1 i i�irr ,r J yr T \`� a� , ± 11 a i r/ 'i.'=NL i 3 1 ..1.t,ir• I. •.•rN is s &s_ V.,r• a.. a. W.NgNT L w w• 11 fY y IerN l ' t ',. mg Isl.if Jr:Lt a`) .�•I,TN w.fvr,•N) ,fL.� iCNp)L )�wt + it t • `4JA i i ` 7t i Uer.n L r dr I. t e0 t,-:'1..1 lie .cw m . 4 1r . • a 'tip a •' - -[ Nt ITO• ST 4,' _--- d 9 9 ,! p k. R .s. i s M�N - . `' ),`ihr .3 o = t r .� +'o" Fa IIrF :.3 i5^�T a VI IT' -','r�`\ s T w j�0 Nl I IM ST•a .Ft IS(M=Cfr'of`` _i 11 f - i . ) %i mown.' O a i»r` i lit 1orF R *an." �<ss3a ♦• i ury/• '1 /•' _ INTERCHANGE Nt a t .e NI IOTr�.*~m w `` w kil• aM ei a I " .'St . ' -V. r .1' i y IOrN R ®� r, . . ~ y5 �w ^ w4 `Ilf•01 !F L1 '',rr 4f i NZ 10TN Sr t Ie, i eloT M".% Lw Orr a=:l, if Sr Mt It 41!Ilef�w `i r• -. t r .f. a.r, i t N! I 41 :\:,.." IL� ai7. �� .1 • •{'• .! 1 SOS ' he Z erN Sf l�• wiya .51 t 1ln ST O - < , . 1—— � ,t. t.'L�1. a= "r, t Cr: CITY LIMITS tTN R t I i1 1 . . ‘\\ ^ I S,� ... / �- i y 11 �/ _ iu'�e Llit N[arN •i4�• i• .oven OM 1 11 I r J ii-: , Ii !rN-.. �• O al.r i• -QI u esw^_ Nc rF Cll. vT .,s:r :;T._,r..... N sewooir.wr •• -f 1[liar.SI i I lr.. i I .. -._ I r tryM -1 .ION NOS L els 4{•• !1 w[ TN tf =• S MST 11 I 1` a't'r . , girl iCNOOLa a 'M `�NS .r. of N 1T • ' r \ •' I . wL { �I1 Sill I I i er T_ —il. 7/y r,•,IN r. ...• ,•' , •• } -rL M•1'l*^N1 4 1•r i nL 0. I mg )T (}MCtjtM W Nf. NIL` •�u.•.�.� :I: rt r rr. &sr i a�i Ne N \ rN R _ n.4 _ +INV:igT 'T 1. sr ". of 7 1.),bM ,T I .•�•' `t^c' NL • ` .6f Nt i-I Sr • ,i r .M AIM sr I • •' ♦ [_• . se ST. L h ^-`, 5 a' ' oi if ''''c\,\...) _ • • 11 r jH it • s _ :::S:F 'e r +...ow sr=��• - a ,r. �� Nsr. i� o • • . .. I1 aIv.wrawl;{{ •.oF !Tip! - a"I •I].a1 scNl S. I . Is a I 1 tl .Y=. y w LI I �Ie .� uuN I.o .. j..., I _.. - wr:•-w=:•1:•1. i 1.' - - L. 1. I1I 1 t Sr cL:MIC .47- •reNTr� • rL �y •L"w."alaT fr ftr S )foe:F UNr`1 ST r ,� ' p.•1e /: - A. q 5. •`' .s• - 7 lroa N. t.'0 rT_f•'' . ..;fI/\ 1, ": �. S•..,..../ r ,. 'i oar.1f\ !a1' ...°. ® ' -_ ^� H •a^. ME,. i:7 900 - { - eeN f i(�e 1 a -1i ^I1.,.1 ,1, ":„ �,---- _• `-= � • C�� RIV_Pic 1Ac s oL ,•_ :�.. ' SU his.' i,r .. ••` .wo.v1,r1. I7i �I1_ - il.r. r1, •, �t _ 1� • • 1.1 �1,- I 1n ,I1r1'. �•r oL rsr I_I ,1 _ • .. r. ..• •)cI - al. ' d,i,Sr.� ifl =-� ( S •I'LT. •44 +r/s.a f �S• /� X. VY al r SI ;1 •• ; _fi 1T II + 1•1,.....1, +., `-+.. " •rl r.ouo ...;.::.-..••- al1 SOUTH RENTON,.,to raw r. L ii..1 � �if, Ir/ 4',r • _ ";,'11 NT Z7MNI GE �L RENTON •- JA[•ea / • J . 4, •` • ' „ .'-.7-,,sS,r•7,1,.?.,C—•ri2r\.•;L...-. 4' s:er i- L 1.i'1.. +s[a,-rN� r .. 4.r t4'' •~:rs`s49'' • e,„[i : ''u MAM.ZNOOD 1 T� ,• �r•L• • tt' •-x ILrFm. e\'Os ♦ o K::L -,TF ,. 4. s .r sr S e./If:LTN TL1'•''_tee.fl crr- a�. .1 '` e•` .y,4.•^5 I• 1 yi ,, .r• [.f 4 ,i..` •r \lll vi° F i ' VLc4Ltr(t"MAr III --.1)//rei A f7 V / , I_ i / /.2--,•\1////) I A r :^ A •' // // 1 • / /y /,/ i ,) i NN i 1 i ,.- •Ti.. ,, i if/ I I' / 7/ / *.•Dy ,,/ / / \ 1 , L112-. ...c'=2--1'7 / • ,. . , , / ,. /./ . ,- . :7 -12., , /. • . ..,,. / ,,,,, , CiTY OF RENTC::1 .-' / / . /- ./ // /1 / / i , "-- . / ii \ [ID LIP 7 1 :3!!!1 DING/Z01\11 T, FL1 LI . J'‘1)U N- 4197Lj° . , f, ..,.,fr / / //7 . \ ' :\ \-; ... . ,,,, nrip I . 1 2' A ' \ . \\ . / s. , . . , ,i, \ \ / : 7, /1 , / . ;,' ,,,,,-.• ,,, , REX FIrii• s).--,, \\ f' • ,. .-, A ./' 'r . , , • 0 .--.-• „.••-• \ \• .// / •• //I:-;1> 4 k•I''''.-.' % . • ;.\,, ,ty \ / 0 / / .)- -,• ./:/ r'f. -.." 6) ,s., 0 . i• I .. `•••..„, ../ / / ,.. '7\ %-1 I . \ , - --C. -/ ..'' .•/1 --.7-ra: , \ . ---, • • . . .. .....,, , „ • ,.., .,, , . ,,,,, ,/,..„ ,_. ., . .,_,.• ,,,,,, 4,..,...„....‘,..s, .. / if] ._, • .„ ....., _ ,,,,J___. N , . , .... . . ,, . .• ... /,./. N i :' 's•-•/ 'It '---2- 6.Itni,- - ,......,rP, . • •',L'(::.-- . .:-." . >\‘ —"-----..._,, 'V.' 45.'At. .0 • L.,./, . ••''''...'"''''''''''''''' (1-\_\‘:\...,-''',„, if,. ' ';7. , . .. , '\,9c. ,.--% •,• .:,.." . . ,..................,„,....:XiS1141,, . .i l'N • ,j)..> ;:• ." ,, .," . :'' , %•gC-P ,---- -';-/. c....e-s,„.„.„._... _ __ ..... _________ ______---/ , :\ 1/ .... - _ _ • ,,, „- ' ><..\\ 0,,,, . , •_ . :::----- Li .. . .s, ...,.. "'12.)'' e \ .• . . ., • • . . _ _- ....• . • ,,,.., - ' ;-\ •1—.: . • ..•. .....) ,. ---i;---- • i ,..c.4", .„ . . . . . . . • - .',z ri 511•J" \ 2,,„ • . \ , ______________ . • V I P K TT mp • . • / . . .. . . ...... . -... . i,• ,,,) c72 - ,.. 1,_) ; ' ! !!:,! 1 C.7 • • ':-.) ;', i // . . . IT ' 1 ' • • ., :z.c.-A\. . .. . . . . . . . . . ,, ,„. . . ......._ . . . - .._... . . . • . . ._.,._ . . , . . . . . .„ . , • . N . . . . • " CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: APPLICATION NUMBER: The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Stoneway Sand & Gravel Co. P.O. Box 509, Renton, 98055 172305-9026-00 Frank Tonkin Jr. 1911 Maple Valley Hwy, Renton, 98055 172305-9173-01 • ii„„ , f„,„ , cA3 It \, .1 ;i: 3 - 9i ( -% • d ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • • l - I ASSESSOR'S • NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • CERTIFICATION I, RAND'( l iz , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for the S ate of Washington residing at' on the day of 107. 1 SIGNED: A. CERTIFICATION OF MAILING cE—,66 ,hereby certify that notices of the publikskeSletir2pir the subject site plan approval were mailed on .)ij RjC 06; /974.7to each lid •aVetveoNperty owner as prescribed by law. ��O; � +,�•.<�Z s .0 NorA R�•V ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a : • Notary Public, i and for the State of Washington �` 9G V@l3G�• *$ residing at kGmt wt , on ?��`•.•�• R, °�°;�O�►i+ R the &S r11. day of v,o 1I 1. ...... Ii n .e SIGNED: FORM 208 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: June 4, 1987 COMMENTS. DUE: June 18, 1987 EFC - 046 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : S 049-87, V-050-87, SM-009-87 PROPONENT: City of Renton Parks and Recreation Department PROJECT TITLE: RPntnn Community Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for Site Plan Approval a Varience and Shoreline Permit for construction of 36,000 sq. ft. Multi-use indoor recreation facility. LOCATION;Cedar River Park, 1717 Maple Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPAC ;VENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 046 - 87 APPLICATION No(s) : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM-009-87 - PROPONENT : CITY OF RENTON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE : RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIENCE AND SHORELINE HERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 36,000 SO. FT. MULTI-USE INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY. LOCATION : CEDAR RIVER PARK_. 1717 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT• LI OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON JUNE 18, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182