Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA87-054 • CONFERENCE REPORT NAME OF PROJECT: N1 / C' OTElQc M& o e_ DATE OF CONFERENCE: C ! tAt( ( PROJECT NO. S 24 - -j 1 zq s-Ct TIME: ' (START) Q ; OO (END) • NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE ATTENDING , 614(A rAimec 0e-t c fe s 6 - 2a LeNIOR_ac BLa M tN 23S Z j Z A 2-( G(Z . 95(3 - 0�32 CO�c) COMMENTS : R A M A C 0l �. ) M F e-C`cC:ck UST b-) NE:4jTA c S - � i A� G'c C c�L\S-t- l T= N E �� AN)`-( d) M � ,��'_ 2 ^oNTIAS CMaTe� 7 RAN. C c-�1 fs\N 107 V ESTI N G- C-) Co C L.‘ST TrAAtNAG. 3-� p�Tt-kS ' c7 PP.2K{N �-- ��e rc� v• 0 "23'• � TQA1 Rc•N.Afnl F\S 1S cL) N's) C Le,A,z, C7 ►N AN CZ, 5) aC S�Q, , /0 t-J-. a) N`o r..)Z-9Q--c-( r- o (2 �� ��Mtt, ass <` � JPAI � Ac n1 1 ;? ti .434 CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman • January 20, 1988 • Helen Klann RAMAC, INC. P. O. Box 653 Renton, Washington 98057 Re: SA-054-87 Ramac, Inc. Site Approval Dear Ms. Klann: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published December 22, 1987 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, • FRED J. IFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 CITY. -ilL F RENT r,11aN a s LAND 1JSE HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman January 7, 1988 Richard L. Wagner • 1321 So. 7th Renton, Washington 98055 Re: RAMAC, Inc. SA-054-87 Dear Mr. Wagner: I have reviewed your request that the condition requiring discreet lighting, Condition 6 of the above entitled decision, and my response follows. The condition subjects the lighting to the approval of the City and I don't think that more specificity is required or reasonable given current City provisions. The condition was not solely directed at aesthetic matters, (although those are embodied in the condition), but at avoiding any kind of nuisance impact on surrounding residential uses which could be adversely affected by continuous bright lighting during the evening hours. I believe that the condition as now worded will accomplish this objective. Since you are a member of the City's Planning Commission you might want to have that body review the City's position on signs and exterior lighting. If this office can be of any further assistance please feel free to call. Sincerely, FRED J. K� FMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: All Parties of Record All Parties of Staff 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 30 3 January 4, 1988 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: RAMAC, INC. File No. SA-054-87 Dear Mr. Kaufman: I read with interest your decision dated December 22, 1987 regarding the referenced application 'for site approval. The proposal for Shari's Restaurant and Silver Cloud Inn, if exe- cuted, will develop one of Renton's few gateway sites, and we should anticipate this development being in place for 30 to 50 years. Thus, this project will greet us citizens as well as our visitors well into the year 2030. Therefore, I think the City should make every effort to encourage a high-caliber project. • In your report, I would encourage you to be more specific as to the intent of Condition 6 of your decision. In particular I would ask you to clarify the use of the term "discrete" when referring to the description of exterior lighting. Because of the high visibility of this site, my greatest fear would be to see an exterior lighting scheme similar to that of the Travelers Inn at the 44th Street exit north of Renton. I realize that the City has no regulations governing buildings that are simply ugly; however, when the Travelers Inn selected lighting as an economical means of turning their entire complex into an advertisement, it became clear to me that King County, the governing jurisdiction, had not done its homework. I would hope' the City of Renton could do better. I would encourage you to consider a limitation on the amount of light (typically measured in foot-candles) which would be allowed in three areas: (1) in the parking areas; (2) on the building fa- cades; and (3) the building rooflines. By simply raising the lighting level to no more than 1-1/2 to 2 foot-candles, it would be very easy for the applicant to conform to your limitations on signage when in fact the entire complex becomes the advertisement. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, chard L. Wagne gw/RLW cc: Jim Weymouth 2603 - 151st Place NE Redmond, WA 98052 Jerry Pate 13635 NW Cornell Road Portland, OR 97229 • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: N That on the 22nd day of December , 1987 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. 7 1111;61 v 4. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this o7920( day of ep CG'1,�. 't , 1987. ; ;),) . Notary Pu is j an for he State of Washington, residing at � , therein. Application, Petition, or Case 4i: SA-O54-87 - RAMAC, INC. (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) December 22, 1987 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: RAMAC, INC. File No.: SA-054-87 LOCATION: Located on the north side of Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Approval for development of a 104 room hotel, a 40,0Q0 sq. ft. restaurant and 40,000 sq. ft. of office space on a 5.696 acre site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on December 1, 1987 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on December 8, 1987 at 9:00 A.M. A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Map showing hotel structure. • Exhibit #4 - Map showing restaurant structure. Exhibit #5 - Elevation Map North-West of Hotel Exhibit #6 - Elevation Map South-East of Hotel Exhibit #7 - Elevation Map of Shari's Restaurant Exhibit #8 - Display Model of proposed restaurant. Exhibit #9 - Full set (4 sheets) showing parking, drainage and paving plans. Exhibit #10 - One sheet showing restaurant and related development on the site. Exhibit #11 - Three sheets showing landscaping of entire site. Exhibit #12 - Packet of application materials t' Exhibit #13 - Map showing parking stall staff suggested eliminating. IA r . RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 December 22, 1987 Page 2 The hearing opened with a review of the application by the Zoning Administrator, Don Erickson. It was pointed out Shari's Restaurant is part of a chain, referred to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map to indicate the surrounding zoning and uses, the proposed hotel will be 104 rooms, the office building approximately 40,000 sq. ft., with the restaurant consisting of 3900 sq. ft. It was also pointed out this site has a very difficult access point due to the on-ramp of I-405, topography, and Maple Valley Highway; there will be provisions for pedestrian signalization on the western edge of the property; utilities are available to the site; storm water drainage would eventually drain into the Cedar River. In 1986 a Conditional Use application was submitted for this site for a mini-storage building but was never built as the City recommended a higher use of the site; the ERC issued mitigated conditions, and Mr. Erickson reviewed the criteria to be considered for Site Plan approval. It was the City's idea that the applicant apply for Site Plan approval for the whole site in order to create a campus-like atmosphere for the entire property; the application meets the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the North East Policy Plan referring to major arterials; the site is terraced and difficult to access; parking is sufficient on-site but some parking spaces may be eliminated to provide more pedestrian movement onto the site; impacts to surrounding uses will be minimal, the use of screening to buffer noise will be evident; on-site storm water retention is being provided; and measures have been suggested to minimize possible noise penetrating inside the hotel rooms due to the proximity of I-405. Erickson said staff feels this is a better development than the previously proposed mini-storage warehouses; there is no indication this site will create noise for the residents of the Monterey Terrace Apartments to the north; emergency access is off Bronson and is proposed to be gated; and staff recommends the hotel be approved with the conditions set out in the staff report, which also include the conditions imposed by the ERC. Continuing, Mr. Erickson said it was suggested that the applicant put together a complete master site plan to ensure the structures are similar in architectural nature, and suggested the hotel be redesigned to better fit the design of the restaurant. He reviewed the ERC conditions set out in the report; spoke to the design of a new traffic signal at Park Place and a crosswalk at Maple Valley Highway at the traffic signal; redesigning should take place at the entrance on the south side of the restaurant to coordinate with the Carco Theater to enable both properties to use the same traffic signal. Emergency access will be from NE 3rd Street and Bronson Way NE to the site; a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage is to be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north; and a system of delineated pedestrian routes is to be established which would connect the proposed buildings on the site. Wishing to enter Exhibits and conduct testimony for the applicant was attorney Joel Haggard.. 2426 Financial Center, Seattle, Wa. He presented a model of the proposed restaurant; asked that the Examiner take notice of the HUD/EPA criteria with respect to interior noise in sleeping areas which he feels should be 45 dBA at night; disagreed with the 40 dBA set by the ERC, and suggested the criteria be 45 dBA for sleeping areas only of the hotel. At this point he called the Traffic Engineer for the City of Renton, Gary Norris. Upon specific questioning from Attorney Haggard regarding the traffic signal requirement at the access driveway he noted the applicant had been asked to prepare a study to evaluate the traffic access from the site to Maple Valley Highway and the N.E. 3rd corridor and after staff's review of this information it was determined that access not be permitted at the N.E. 3rd corridor due to existing traffic constraints, which then limited the access to Maple Valley Highway. During this time the Parks and Recreation Dept. was looking at their access to the newly proposed Community Center and it was felt to be in the best interest of the City that the Carco Theater and the subject site utilize the same access point at the Maple Valley Highway corridor. The State Dept. of Transportation must approve the signal, and it was agreed that the City and the applicant will work together to obtain that approval. If the State should not approve this signal then the access would have to be limited to right turn-in, right out turns only. Norris stated if the applicant coordinates the signal as suggested under condition #2 then the $6300. mitigation fee should not be necessary and he will make that recommendation to the ERC. He stated there will be approximately 2200 vehicle trips per day, feels there is sufficient queuing room for vehicles for the east/south traffic at the intersection of Maple Valley Highway, with approximately 200 ft. between this driveway and the ramp to 1-405. In closing Norris stated it has been discussed that an approximate 150 ft. storage lane at that intersection would be worked out with the design of the traffic signal. Testifying for the Silver Cloud Inn was Jim Weymouth, Silver Cloud Inn, 2603 151st Place N.E., Redmond, WA. 98052. The proposed Inn is a part of this proposal. The Inn will be 104 units; the design of the Inn was to the 40 dBA noise requirement and he feels this is sufficient to cover the entire Inn. He stated there will be interaction between the proposed Shari's Restaurant on the site and his Inn, and feels the availability of the pedestrian connection between the Inn and the restaurant is very good; and does not feel the suggested relocation of the pedestrian circulation from the west side to the east side of the street is necessary as it is off the lobby and elevator and is most accessible as shown the current plans. Referring to recommended conditions for the project Mr. Weymouth stated his pleasure with the design of the Silver Cloud Inn and did not agree with the suggestion to possibly change the vertical pylons/support columns stating they RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 December 22, 1987 Page 3 had already changed the roofline and color of their Inn to coordinate with Shari's Restaurant. The design of their building utilizing the columns is not only aesthetic but functional as it covers the heat pumps located on the outside of the building. Referring to condition #3 regarding removal of a portion of access parking to provide greater pedestrian access he suggested 4 stalls be deleted in the front of the building by the lobby and that space be used as an outdoor plaza. In closing he verified this will be just a hotel, no restaurant or cocktail lounge, but will have conference rooms, indoor pool, and other amenities. Testifying for Shari's Restaurant, included in this site approval request was Jerry Pate, 13635 N.W. Cornell Rd.,Portland, Oregon 97229. Upon questioning by Attorney Haggard, Mr. Pate stated he did not see any need to change the design of the restaurant to better match the proposed Silver Cloud Inn as they had many meetings previously and he feels the decisions should be those they agreed upon and are approved by the City. He acknowledged the location of these two buildings on the site (the Inn is topographically higher than the restaurant) and due to the fact they are not located side by side feels the difference in architecture should not be a consideration. Asked his opinion as to why staff only recommended site approval for the Inn and not the restaurant because it was felt the final utilization of the site was not yet determined, Mr. Pate stated the plans for the restaurant have been completed and submitted to the City; site plans have been worked out with the City, they are ready to build now and feels all the architecture and complementary amenities have been submitted and are felt to be complementary to the hotel; agrees the access concerns have been met and requested that the restaurant be approved at the same time as the Inn. Mr Al Klann, 15107 S.E. 46th Way, Bellevue, WA. 98006 testified he has worked with the owner of the site on this proposal noting phase 1 will consist of the hotel and restaurant site and phase 2 will be the office complex. He said it was suggested by staff that they provide a master plan for the whole site; the renderings for the office building are only conceptual at this point and they will come back at the time of development for further review. If approval is only given for the hotel then that would allow the option of varying whatever comes out with the next submittal. This is not their intent - they wish to cohesively develop the complete site as per Exhibit #2, subject to further review by staff with respect to details of the office building as Phase 2 and would accept that as a condition of site plan approval. A rendering of the office complex was submitted in July of 1987 and it was never intended to be a final plan for the building but just an overall concept for the entire site, with three elevation levels for the site. Office level is approximately 14 - 16 ft. higher than street level. Further testimony was presented by Logan Garrison representing the Monterey Terrace Apartments, 75 Monterey Drive N.E., Renton, WA. 98056. A letter he presented to staff was acknowledged as part of the permanent record of the City wherein the concerns of the citizens were expressed - namely building heights, traffic patterns, stability of soil and pile driving for the buildings. Mr. Garrison requested he be kept apprised of the building plans for this proposal. Attorney Joel Haggard stipulated there would be no pile driving for support of the structures. Don Erickson wanted the record to reflect the site plan presented today was only received by staff yesterday and requested the hearing be continued to review and make comments on this new submittal; referred to condition #7 regarding noise soundproofing and quoted a portion of the dBA requirement by the State. Attorney Haggard closed stating he feels the Site Plan and elevation plans that have been on file should serve as sufficient information to enable consideration be given to both phases for approval and sees no reason for continuance of this hearing. He acknowledged nothing major, only minor changes have been made to the plans. He requested approval not be restricted to the hotel only but the complete site be examined; feels it is necessary to put an added condition on site plan approval which requires that prior to any construction or issuance of any permits for the office building that it be brought before staff to review the elevations to ensure the compatibility of the building materials between the office and the Inn and Restaurant. He requested that approval be given for the applicant to proceed with the Site Plan presented as Exhibit #2; clarify the matter of $6300. as there is now no need for this condition; suggested condition #3 be deleted but add that consideration be given to the sidewalk on either the east or the west side of the entrance off Maple Valley Highway, condition #4 is agreeable, condition 5 should be corrected to read "west" instead of "east edge", and condition #6 should be deleted. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:55 A.M. RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 December 22, 1987 Page 4 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Ramac, Inc, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for the development of a hotel, restaurant and potential office building on an approximately 5.696 acre parcel. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a mitigated Declaration of Non-Significance (M-DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the northeast corner of the I-405 and Maple Valley interchange. The site is immediately north and east of the I-405 on-ramp. 6. The City Council adopted Ordinance 1522 which reclassified a portion of the site to B-1 (Business/Commercial) in August 1955. The remainder of the site was reclassified B-1 by the adoption of Ordinance 3677, enacted by the City Council in November, 1982. 7. The subject site is a triangular shaped parcel bounded on the south by the Maple Valley Highway and on the west by the I-405 on-ramp from Maple Valley. The northwest corner of the site has frontage on Bronson Way N.E. This frontage and potential point of access would serve solely for emergency access to prevent circumventing the Sunset Boulevard/Maple Valley signal controlled intersection. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of commercial uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9. The site has been graded to provide three level building pads. The site actually presents a three tiered approach. A drive enters from Maple Valley. Immediately left on entering would be the access to the proposed restaurant. Proceeding north, the driveway rises approximately 10 to 12 feet providing access to parking for the hotel, again on the left. The drive continues its rise approximately another 10 to 12 feet providing access on the left to additional hotel parking and on the right access to the proposed office building. There is an existing foundation for an office building on the site. 10. Utility lines are located around the perimeter of the site and have suitable capacity to serve the site. 11. The site is located across the Maple Valley Highway from the Cedar River Park. The Carco Theater is located in the park and the new community recreational facility will be located in the park. 12. The site plan consists of a 104 room hotel (down from an original 115), and a 3,900 sq. ft. restaurant. Included in the plan is a potential layout or conceptual plan for an office building, although specific plans for the building are not under review at this time. The office building would be subject to the review prevailing when complete plans are submitted. 13. Complete plans were not submitted until the week prior to the hearing, and new plans were submitted at the public hearing. Early versions on file with the City showed the restaurant plans were submitted for a Westminster, Colorado restaurant. A plan naming the City of Renton was submitted at the hearing. 14. The restaurant, a Shari's Restaurant, would be located in the southwest corner of the subject site. The restaurant would be located approximately at street level, approximately 55 feet. The entrance would be oriented to the southwest. The hexagon shaped building would be clad in a combination of stucco and concrete. The building would be one-story in height. The roof would slope in on all sides and would be finished in concrete roof tile. The roof will overhang the building, providing a canopy. Each corner of the hexagon would project a buttress from roof to sidewalk. RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 December 22, 1987 Page 5 15. The parking complement for the restaurant is 39 stalls. Parking would surround it on three sides, the south, east and west. At the northwest corner of the parking lot would be a stairway up to the next level, the hotel level. 16. The hotel, a Silver Cloud Inn, will be set into the sloping second tier. It will be four stories at the south end and three stories on the north. The first floor of the hotel will be at approximately 71 feet. The south edge of the hotel parking area would be at an elevation approximately 12 higher than the restaurant and connected to it by the above mentioned stairway. The hotel would be 'L' shaped with the open end of the 'L' facing northeast. An entry would be located at the intersection of the two legs of the 'L,' at the southwest corner of the hotel. 17. The hotel's roof treatment would mirror the roof of the restaurant, consisting of the same sloping aspect and the same color and tile materials to provide a unified theme and appearance. The hotel would again be clad in the same manner as the restaurant to meld the two projects. 18. One hundred and eleven parking stalls would surround the hotel on all sides. The aisle layout presented at the hearing was modified to reflect staffs review of the less than adequate circulation pattern near the northwest corner of the parking lot. A secondary access for emergency vehicles will be provided at the northwest corner of the hotel site, with access to Bronson Way N.E. 19. The applicant proposes a unified landscape theme across the entire site. The restaurant would be surrounded by a modest landscaped area and sidewalk. Similarly, the hotel would be rimmed by landscaping. The parking areas contain perimeter landscaping and the larger parking areas of the hotel contain smaller planter islands at the ends of the aisles. The topographic difference between the restaurant and hotel sites provide an \ opportunity to landscape the gradient and stairway. 20. The office building, again only conceptual in nature, is proposed to have similar landscape elements. Presumably the office building would be finished in a similar fashion to the other components of the site plan. 21. Along the west edge of the site, the applicant will create a pedestrian pathway to provide access between the end of Bronson Way and the Maple Valley Highway. This path will facilitate access to the Cedar River Park from areas north of the subject site. 22. The applicant also proposes maintaining the steep sand-based slope leading up to the Monterey Terrace community. The native vegetation in this area will be maintained. 23. The ERC imposed two specific conditions to which the applicant takes exception. The first exception was to Condition 1 which requires payment of a sum of $6,300 to mitigate a series of traffic related impacts. The applicant, supported by the Traffic Engineer, notes that Conditions 2 through 4 overlap that condition and was included in error. Fees payable under these latter conditions cover the expected expenses. 24. The second exception taken by the applicant was to Condition 7. That condition reads: "That hotel units facing the I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dBA or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment." The applicant's particular exception was regarding the applicability of the condition to the entire hotel complex. The condition clearly is limited by its terms. There was no showing that the dBA proposed by the ERC was inappropriate or clearly erroneous. 25. Access to the site is a difficult proposition. The east or southbound left turn to the on- ramp to I-405 from Maple Valley is within approximately 200 feet of the site. In addition the topography of the site and driveway grade limits dictate only one acceptable entrance. Further complicating the access is the access to the Cedar River Park directly across Maple Valley Highway from the site. The addition of the new community recreation complex is anticipated to draw a large community attendance. Expectations are that the Park will also attract patrons of the hotel particularly, and probably the office building once it is constructed. 26. The projected traffic generated by the proposal would be in the range of 2,325 vehicle trips per day. Access LOS is projected to approach LOS E. Modifications to and alignment of the various left turn queues, acceleration lanes, and crosswalks, as well as altered signal timing, are expected to accommodate the traffic of both the subject site and the Park. The City will share some of the costs of these various modifications. I ' • RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 December 22, 1987 Page 6 CONCLUSIONS 1. Section 4-738(D)(1) lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Approval application. These include the following: a. General Criteria: 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; 7. Provision of adequate light and air; 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. 2. The proposed site plan is compatible with both the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for commercial purposes, and the Zoning Code. 3. The preservation of the easterly greenbelt, the steep slope below Monterey Terrace, and the topographic differential all work to mitigate any adverse impacts on that single family community. The proposal should not have an adverse affect on property values in the area. 4. The circulation patterns, especially as modified in the area of the hotel parking lot, appear adequate. Pedestrian circulation would be assisted by the provision of a sidewalk paralleling the main driveway. Without a sidewalk in this location, access to the proposed office building would either be via the driveway itself, an unsafe proposition at best, or via a proposed staircase. Since this staircase is almost 2 stories high it may not provide an efficient means of access to the office building. The applicant, therefore, will have to • install a sidewalk on at least one side of the driveway. The choice of location shall be up to the applicant. Also, a sidewalk should be paired opposite this lower stairway across to the restaurant. 5. The topography of the site is such that providing adequate light and air should not present any problems. The buildings are widely spaced and the various levels afford a feeling of spaciousness. 6. The proposal should not create any adverse noise. The location of the site surrounded, on two sides by major highways, could affect the site. The ERC noise mitigation measures are, therefore, appropriate. This office is not quite sure if the amphitheater effect of the surrounding topography might not require similar measures for the non-highway exposed hotel units. Therefore, the applicant will have to take similar measures along all aspects of the hotel. If these additional measures are not necessary after a certified acoustic study for these other aspects of the building, they may be eliminated. 7. A proposal is also required to demonstrate mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses as follows: a. Mitigation of undesirable impacts of proposed structures and site layouts that could impair the use or enjoyment or potential use of surrounding uses and structures and of the community; b. Mitigation of undesirable impacts when an overscale structure, in terms of size, bulk, height, and intensity, or site layout is permitted that violates the spirit and/or intent of the Zoning Code and impairs the use, enjoyment or potential use of surrounding properties; RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 December 22, 1987 Page 7 c. Provision of a desirable transition and linkage between uses and to the street, utility, walkway, and trail systems in the surrounding area by the arrangement of landscaping fencing and/or other buffering techniques, in order to prevent conflicts and to promote coordinated and planned benefit from, and access to, such elements; d. Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid over-concentration of structures on a particular portion of a site such that they create a perception of greater height or bulk than intended under the spirit of the Zoning Code; e. Effective location, design and screening of parking and service areas in order to promote efficient function of such facilities, to provide integrated facilities between uses when beneficial, to promote "campus-like" or "park-like" layouts in appropriate zones, and to prevent unnecessary repetition and conflict between uses and service areas or facilities; f. Mitigation of the unnecessary and avoidable impacts of new construction on views from existing buildings and future developable sites, recognizing the public benefit and desirability of maintaining visual accessibility to attractive natural features and of promoting "campus-like" or "park-like" settings in appropriate zones; g. Provision of effective screening from public streets and residential uses for all permitted outdoor storage areas (except auto and truck sales), for surface mounted utility equipment, for rooftop equipment, and for all refuse and garbage containers, in order to promote a "campus-like" or park-like" setting where appropriate and to preserve the effect and intent of screening or buffering otherwise required by the Zoning Code; h. Consideration of placement and design of exterior lighting in order to avoid excessive brightness or glare to adjacent properties and streets. 8. The proposed use appears to be well designed and it does not appear to create any undue impacts which might interfere with the use and enjoyment of surrounding uses. The scale of the buildings proposed so far, the hotel and restaurant, will not be out of character - actually they are fairly isolated. It does not appear that views will be blocked, but that is a possibility. 9. The traffic patterns around the site might have to be analyzed once the site is developed. Stacking space at the Maple Valley 'Y' could be impaired if a backup of vehicles trying to enter the subject site occurs. The signal controlled walkway between the site and the park appears to provide a safe method of crossing Maple Valley Highway. The applicant will provide a trail along the west boundary to accommodate pedestrians on the way to the park and conditioned internal sidewalks should accommodate pedestrians within the complex. 10. The site plan takes advantage of the contours of the site. Terraces have been created and each structure will be on its own level, with parking similarly designed. 11. The design of complementary, similarly styled and finished buildings will give the site the effect of an integrated campus. The matching landscaping between buildings, around buildings and on the slopes between levels assists in defining the campus. 12. The development will obviously introduce additional noise and light but it should be minimal. To avoid any potential problems the site should not have any rooftop signs, tall pole signs or other method of identifying the site which will light up the areas above the site where single family homes are located. All lighting shall be kept discreet and shall be approved by the City. 13. The site plan ordinance also requires mitigation of Impacts of the proposed site plan to the site as follows: a. Building placement and spacing to provide for privacy and noise reduction; orientation to views and vistas and to site amenities, to sunlight and prevailing winds, and to pedestrian and vehicle needs; b. Consideration of placement and scale of proposed structures in relation to the openness and natural characteristics of a site in order to avoid overconcentration or the impression of oversized structures; RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 December 22, 1987 Page 8 c. Preservation of the desirable natural landscape through retention of existing vegetation and limited soil removal, insofar as the natural characteristics will enhance the proposed development; d. Use of existing topography to reduce undue cutting, filling and retaining walls in order to prevent erosion and unnecessary storm water runoff, and to preserve stable natural slopes and desirable natural vegetation; e. Limitation of paved or impervious surfaces, where feasible, to reduce runoff and increase natural infiltration; f. Design and protection of planting areas so that they are not susceptible to damage from vehicles or pedestrian movements; g. Consideration of building form and placement and landscaping to enhance year- round conditions of sun and shade both on-site and on adjacent properties and to promote energy conservation. 14. The orientation of buildings appears reasonable. They make use of the site, and again openness is preserved by the spacing between buildings and the terraced effect of the site. Clearing and grading has already occurred on portions of the site, but the applicant is maintaining the natural buffer and slope presented by the easterly hillside. 15. Circulation and access appear reasonable as indicated above. Traffic patterns may need further analysis which can be accomplished by Traffic Engineering. Parking is provided for each use and appears reasonably convenient for each of the uses. 16. Access has been consolidated, mainly due to the limited access from surrounding streets. Emergency access, which shall be gated, will provide dual access to the site when necessary. 17. The conditions imposed upon the project are reasonably necessary to provide for safe circulation of vehicles and pedestrians in a manner sufficient to avoid conflicts. 18. Again, the office building has not been sufficiently detailed to permit review, and remains subject to separate review. The exterior treatment of the future office building shall match as much as possible the exterior treatment of the two other components of this site. 19. The specific design details regarding matching butresses, pillars or what have you, shall be left to the applicant's discretion. But the general exterior design shall be guided by the implementation of same exterior treatment, colors and materials, as well as landscape materials to maintain the coordinated campus appearance. 20. In summary, the proposed site plan appears to serve the public use and interest, is well designed, accommodates the natural slopes and will be well landscaped. DECISION The proposed Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: Except as provided above, the applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The applicant shall install a sidewalk on at least one side of the main access driveway. The choice of location shall be up to the applicant. The sidewalk shall end at the Maple Valley frontage in such fashion that a link is created at the signalized crosswalk. 3. An additional short leg of sidewalk shall be paired opposite the lower stairway from the office building level across to the restaurant. 4. Soundproofing meeting the requirements of the ERC shall be installed in all guest units unless a certified acoustic engineer indicates that the interior sound level of the units will not exceed the standard imposed by the ERC. 5. Any trail or linkage created along the west boundary of the site shall be developed in a fashion which matches all the other sidewalks of the complex. RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 December 22, 1987 Page 9 6. There shall not be any rooftop signs, tall pole signs or other method of identifying the site which will light up the areas above the site where single family homes are located. All lighting shall be discreet and shall be approved by the City. 7. The exterior treatment of the future office building shall match as much as possible the exterior treatment of the two other components of this site. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of December, 1987. QC , FRED J. KAMAN HEARING E AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of December, 1987 to the parties of record: Joel Haggard Attorney At Law 2426 Financial Center Seattle, WA. 98161 Jim Weymouth 2603 - 151st Place NE Redmond, WA. 98052 Jerry Pate 13635 NW Cornell Road Portland, Oregon 97229 Al Klann 15107 SE 46th Way Bellevue, WA. 98006 Logan Garrison 75 Monterey Drive NE Renton, WA. 98056 George A. Fanning 2021 Jones Ave. NE Renton, WA. 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of December, 1987 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. January 5, 1988. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. • RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 December 22, 1987 Page 10 The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: RaMac, Park Place ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-055-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3 , 900 sq. ft. restaurant and a 40, 000 sq. ft. office building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 on-ramp traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6, 300. 00 for the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the ramp. 2 . That the applicant shall be responsible for designing a new traffic signal and having it installed at the existing entrance to Park Place. It will be the applicant's responsibility to see that the new traffic signal is coordinated with the on-ramp traffic signal to I-405. The signal design shall meet the City of Renton ' s existing equipment. 3 . That the applicant provide a crosswalk across the Maple Valley highway at the traffic signal. 4 . That the applicant be responsible for the off-site improvements on the north side of Maple Valley Highway along the project site frontage on Maple Valley Highway. 5 . That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 6. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 7 . That hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 8 . That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. 9 . That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the site. *A Determination of Non " iificance Mitigation Measures • RaMac, Park Place Page 2 10. To reduce glare and, other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant), from upland properties, the applicant shall provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing canopy trees around the parking areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building and Zoning Department. 11. That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. . 1;• L[ __ `..'` CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE , (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-049-87 t APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-054-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and 40, 000 sq.ft. office building on a 5. 696 acre site. PROPONENT: RaMac,Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS). is not required under RCW 43.2.1C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was, made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures ' by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , November 9, 1987, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 . Phone: 235-2550 DATE OF DECISION: October 21, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: October 26,1987 ./1/4/9---,----_____ 241nald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer uilding and Zoning Director Policy Development Director 16 Ri rd C. Houghton /45- Pub is Works Director •e • f e.-? 11,e.i Ei. .; s ip ; u ,' • 1.,,,,til - !1n'r7 r=-�oia=, '�rL— ?•. y l� � /;/ 1~ •I 1 1 {1 • , '1 ,r .-WIG .i .: : _..i tf 7,. IL.;1:--4.... v. p ' ." 4 ) AP .',,.D ---3-7,,'1-:,,. , /44/ mil f 310 \JI t/ �� `\ / I. Di- -WF.,,z.z. . :1K i 27/t/ _ - i -- /BETY ,/1/;.i • \ \ .,, W /• / l \ rr c � .L 1.\ a act / "+ 1/ / /.•''' \\��� ' 11__.;t> o, a MTOL/VET PARK �" / o ME"F_2Y a ,�. (CEDAR RIVER �\. Ilr' : .roz 1,-T.,,,; 3 PARK \ I , 1 I ! Fr . -' ' 2'N• _:..y.! . ...,... et, . • :-1 • A -l4f(i ' : 71: 2- . l • ' -, --;fir ` .1 pp l • ,. - 'II _ \,n 29 1 -•" l uir,r i )\"t _ti \ C.. ,w - -\:, ,,.. 2 t 'Yj \_ZtL_ • 1 - - 1 I, , i '!I 1 1 2 ' r !9 Y 1 .' '• 1 : I , 5 , \, n �f� I .1 i T 6-i 1 JI � lF •�1 •� II `� 1 i/ LI I I—`_1. \40 �' 1)1 _ 11Ire . ' • RaMac, Incorporated SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-054-87 , APPLICANT • RaMac Incorporated TOTAL AREA 5.7 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Maple Valley Highway EXISTING ZONING B-1, Business Use EXISTING USE Undeveloped, partial foundation of old building permit in place. PROPOSED USE Hotel , Restaurant and Office Building. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial • COMMENTS Application for site plan approval for the construction of a 104 room hotel , a 3,900 square foot restaurant and a 40,000 square foot office building. Located north of Maple Valley .Highway and east of the on-ramp to 1-405. • .via- '-%: 44:•-iali'". - 1 I A . - •,..- . . k c';\*...__, - - I--n ........ .0. • •14:. , ..- ‘-• . .,„•,., - . - %. ,••• §,Niiiil: •••-...: -....-:-.,;-:„. - 't tc.'t.fa • I ""N,. •-.i.,-,-:.---: -.....:):1:::::::::-....-..:•.,..:-.,-; .1. Winn& h LAKE 4 iitt ' ...::::: -t i ...iii: ••••••••••-!1...,":.- •'‘.;• „; ,:r, , .f.,.0 0 1 3::::.:::'5.-'•:`:`:1 ,q,,... 1' r•-• , l, i ‘ .•. , sA-,opt,;.::,:::::'•'6. SH1NGTON ‘..1 t -4 ):,C:. . Al..o°4°....11.,_i,i,...: :' ....! ....7.5.0^. ;,..,,..,...:c...,,.:......., i r: , •,----,\ ---i 10, t; Ilikiii;iii::::%! .,-. omN1.1.1111111111i2Timnosos• . mop •::::::M IBEX t•••'!.. ,•‘. 'f . ' '''''•'' mil r.p: I : trical, -, ,• . iiiiia ..:.0:.i.IPtialli . .0' V.1.1, 1: • j hiosor.. iiii...:. 9111821110 11 11/11W/11.• ' . •11:1•••• 1:111, ' •VO 0-0-0.• ' • JIIIIIra • 41-,...•..,,,,,..-c. tammi ...-,\c„...,..r.....2.. ma '*ceo°0Vd IS:•:•:•::ii•'',iii•swAsso MO tali-ill, __\ mode iiii:••••••;.;J'.?.::,:.:i..i'•JaE:ErAtr. , --....6•••- F ••• -•-•• , • • .• ii .. mos i. .. ,,o o o ' -*%lip i ... ilii?:::i:ii:ii:i:i*:::::::::::,,-.-4,„;;Fi i.•:M4.iM A. • 0000 •4\.,..v.t .,,„4,...4 ::,:i*::::i Iti-7;;;;;;72%r- II 1 • t0, 0. . ,.. 000 • 00 ... • \ iii;i::.:.......proi....;„.,.... :ii:K:.* of, IMO. 1 :;•:•••••::::::::::.1 1--,...... ''.- „••;:i*::: lt,,,NrAnsy.affir.? NM ... .....---."-_ ........: 0°0°0.0°0°0°-, 0°0 ',;„, --,„ ..:::::i.::: I samil. .., ..: •__.. . ,111 ''' • 0019000 , ,.:::•.*::. 1111 MINOR Fir-o'o,..' ' • g g o • o g o o - o Al g ,- .:iii:.;,i:iii:. r''_,.....0.■• -i:,...Ver4.:P4V MINI '," -" \ AF,20214,' . to'o°4).•°•°o°e°o°o°., ••°g o a ..:, • ..g:•:,t••:::::•17-7.1 . ...:i::::•:•:.Siiitti. Imo=ii: t • 6.---e 00000eooe cioeoo , :...... . ,....._> lan„,i 1\11°244°g°'.$ 00 • 0 • 00 • 0 • 0 00 ' , ' •-•- -• ' 1 'gogogogog• • - • • • • .• • • • , • 0;0 • • ,,,,,. 1.ii. III !NV ,....,..' , rk.c. A-02,80gog-,;. k (34,•,..,°.,e.° e.°0°0°.°0°• 0'0°0 '.]:,, .:.::::141". ' - -' 111111L 1 r:4*roVofoTofoq 1- . 7::,S-TTOO1,,,,i;.:F• 0.......iiii '..•.14 0°°o°°ceog°o°.Atl.W s ii 'e i o o * 4;1 o *.o.o,G ei• • -.,, . ae,,,x,•gooc, 0 0., , • • • co . 0 0 0 , •.•.•.•.•.••••. 'N'.oggelggoti) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 „0.0.Rilb,1011,,,i •. ..:::•:•:•:•:•:.:•:,:•., ""( • • • • . • 0 0 .0 0__•_ _0 ,..A • ..-:•:•:....:.:•:•:::•:•::::.:.., ..o000o0oisg. b, • a • • • o • ..., •. o...e...•2.,00 .,, %., Iiiillw.los i mg ,........... •.•.•.......•..• ..... .. .•..•.oog0gt,ggo; ko 0 • o . .•• ,,. ..,-,..•9`.0"•0 - .-::::::::::::'. ..:•::iii.f:iiigitiO :::.:„ ;\i'..?.eiggggAicte • • • ii--..... ... . ... . . 1 • :.....:.:• .....:;;;;;;;;.:::.;:•.0::::::: :4)0090 oda o*d)!•,, - 0 0 • ob 0 :1*.• di -?0 g 0 g ogos,.t i.-Am.v..20ggogoltto • „. .... 0 0 111111111 od. •)WE, lelgEk,.;.. \h, , ' IN °000°o°o°o• - - v.:•:,,:•::,xn::::::0*we " " „, i _____... , .lok..%)Q0S7;010°,;:.4.„V°.°% .:!.i.fi:::::::',:'":11:::1'"':"7.:'":"•daJG'::`,/,' /''''.liVaill '' .°0:o: ......:•:•:•:•:•:::::::m:::::::::. 1 ,i , .... ?I: .;:g8g2g2,32,3,7,al,o°o•• 0:1 'L"-.-.I-.1.4:ii 1 .'bk-1.0-47'b'.-4•4 44v-co. lb/ ,00•..• ......,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :!... ,...i. :-.. .: .: ...... .,.i: :0g02,02,,ogol .•_ ' •gingi,.I*cr?...,,,...,",r , At ogo,(3ogsgogo; • co•.•.:;••ii- no 1 ,.r., 47, 4,.., 111111116144.44t 1, ''''OriBINg.,• ."13. ,,. ,:iiirniNi.....; ''':::.:•iii :'''.•:: :',i'ii .°0:0°10.0.0000000.0.. .•. •••• f- :•:•:.:1174- iiiii II ogoogo002001044:7044/c:,•`....t.'4, ;. ',‘,':i Al: rs ,,, -..:,....7......::: :::•::iim.••••• . 0-0.. !----• . 0,3 c,0 0,z,c,0 I::.::11 •gogg5,000000g.,i, ?gg• ii.z, Ill.,. • 'a >4' •/II • '•••••••••••••••' -"T•••••4'''''''•••••••:•-• -••••••!..*:•• .::::••••:• ' -0 000'737:77°-.0000000000000000000:00000: : .- ::;:i gn'T.-1. :ogogogogogogog.0,..4...,,c;4,-0'1 - ;:.. %%00%0°00000_ ./•.00. gtirligo.wiirei/4, ,;.iiiiiimin ,. .::::::... .::ii:.iiii::::m,,:c60.00.00.00000000.400°00.0.0.00%.0000000: .:•i::.:.:.i.::i..-:.,::..m.......7..4...:.:.:::::kiggiii.i i, Mogogogogogogo,•,•"(f.:.•?.:. :11: 1..7.;:...1., . ,;r4 *'%:::',0'.......,;ce" ...:.:„K:i:•::•:::,::,::::::.:::::::::::::.1,0,09,9_09,0,0_0,.....0.9_0_0_0_0_0_0__. ...... . :*::•::•:*,..:: ant •;•;)ogogogogogogogogoN °o'''-",,, MIS ""lg.' a'• • • . v • c.!.•• .i;i::.::.::.::.*:.:i*:.:i:i:i..i..i::::.:':•00°0°0000'0°0'.017000000v0F000.-0. :::::: .o°0. '••••'••. . MI - -0-2 .D.:.••••04,..c...04 II pg; .. ._...• ,Ai)rii, ......1%,••'... ....r•,' i:ipi..iniiiiiiiiiiii. .0900,§2000000000000..000000000 0 0 0 0.3 I 131::•telP ..:7,2• 'i. .irr r in ii...7,c,,.1:,,aritunt, „ziviii,,44041.„...1.11.7.:7..... , . ..0 ,.„ :11 soma ''..., 1. ••••.......i:I:i:1:::•::::::::i:i: .00 0 00000 0.0000000000000000000. t:::::•::.2•::::.:.:.: , . 'Si.,.I. . -eglarst ifttimr '.------- •?'• 1.4 k..;,...st,•-iiii,..;,--- /- • ,•,,, . • • i .. ..:.:.::::::::::::::::::::: .°.°N.°09§).°09).0.0 0 0 000 0 I:.:.:.,....:.:.:.:.:. . r.,,,,,, . -A3,60-•:•••t,•.0•.,..,.;' 1, •;;;••44, ,..,...,i,...,e. .7 , NMI ,j ,...., i „000„',.lo,.::::!::.:::*::::i:i:i:i:::i •o o 000 000000000. i ..:.:...........::::::::: ••••••,1112 T.=MEM 0°0g0;5•08 41.111••1. 2.1•21•11V. .y.,L..r, ....: . . ••4 . •.•000..0. ...iiii.:i:iiiix::.:.::::: - :,. .V0°00°0000• .... .::,......:::::::::::: - 10111:1.300°0°0°0°0 illlitingtA.-'• ej' 1 3, 2,..mmmm;;;00.0.00000 ..............ye,.\:A , Si. , ..,{,i\ ,, iga't gilt t' :::.:i:i*:*i:ig::::: .0000000 14-. :..• .......„.:.: '''-----iiiii::::Nifil '0°V-'.11.21S4--41:1::: ,74 NI ', g::::;:::i:::.:it:iii.g ,. ,,,;,;',.7.,,..,../..,.'-A,. ::.i: :::.: :::..:.:.c30)3 Immo manimmai','.° .•-• .`.... , rrf.C.IZ,V:q' r!!".'C3; : ./.= --- -... 1....F3011111:13!•ne!!!!!!!"1•W*'- 7.',,,-;`• ''`•..,,, 'tik ,-.`.1;''..,;•• ...'' 'co, ...... ,../1.3..C-3,4;r:19.-t,'/:''oTr:: ''9.t,,,t°,. ':::: :::::i:i:i:::::ii. ' ti: •::::e -Vial-.4--111111M111111111111 millifiPta!1 3i,".-aP •',,,..,' .et_ ,i'',q1;,,,i'. -o'5?...' ''',::'7':-'''• r..'''''.1,7`;'•;:i;•c..9,'f?.,,,,T;.,c'n?.' o,nje'.i., .:::::::i:::::::::::: ,Aii , r, -:',..'Irimga---rg*/4.• '•::11::::i 3::Rd" .: ',,,t•',.',,;.' .1Y-3.$ ..:pce.- 1.',:i.,--...;,?;;'is,'?.`7.,?;:f?.-).;`',q)';-,?•,-z•,..rs;',.T:';:-.'•:.,.:7i.:cif' ,:r6;7;''t, ••:•*::::::.:•• ' •-•' .Wi 1 :00.011ie. .•':"""Vir•:154"9! • ' 0; fc,',3n. Arret„„%t.e,4 Iti:f4,--zee;:s,s, ,f,:5-3,74,,..„Y,•:' - ' ''-;.e.-,:,ess;,,19,,s•,;'..:ss,i,„,..•••••••• OPP ., ,„:„,••••!.•.‘) 1 ,..,:q1., 11;;;E: : i \ ,,,,,,s.c.,? :i,,, 6-,sz,--,(.. '',. .,.:„. ,?,,,,f.: '•.1 f7A",.„1.•'• L- '-'•`, s e i •••• ,'!•0 •;4; 1, W\"..N:' '4 'mg'. • ' ..:. ..,',:,' •:.4- ', ••; .11Mini.'•P-,,, -•,1„,._ -re' . e ci,-.-i- ':;,•(e.;;,i;,....,,,:,,..1,,,,::s,', .11. --mor..-at g&'..,,e.:A:krai i '''';`-',,i;,,. *' ' '7.1"Illis"-' C?: " .t?I‘IIPIIIK '''''''' /••• ' • (I -'''.4'-'''''''''''1'''' ;.'' moo . , 41._,,, •-••=„!...' st4c. .•' ,. -S...,Irarolult% fig ! . .-,`%::T:, •••',;p:• •,'",441- :• .•,ri'er *, Z'''...,.."cp. ,is ...?,5- • I•• 0.',- - r• e, • ',.1 =f,e... UMW '''.11TWO•k14102• .jr t .•°X0,•5••%••‘.0:•:'•1‘V e '' • dt.). k- : A7•'. rOF•'.. ''AlPilliM 111111111.11 %,',:"+;.:11,.4f,te?•;y:Ifp.t•, ;,p,...,.... ..,;.'e„i,P,(2;.',Id?1.:..14. 41,1i4 :•`\WRIIIIk:',.C1•..;r6Acitko:.51.44,.... ,,,y' • ,5111851• -P..srgi:•••th•:at 1/1.i 12 ., . .. „ , .. , I •.c•• o 'o a i,:•.V.,V1,1•,••C> .. ,...._, 11 4E1 '•1,',A•:...s." \V4:i:•1•i;•10.1 N ' k, . , ,,,,,y,ocitr,,,.,-.,,..cp 0..;,-0,.,07 c,-.10.". Qt..',.,•.•',.. r, ...___, --•..,,, -"‘W„.,..,C.•Vtii.0,r,•4:,P6-•''.' .•r •-' . • '.11!',*WAMMO.;:,iiihm , • - C.,`,;e 4-4,...1.'in.'?,');-'.1,,E1,i,'., ';IT.t. -Iv \ ' ''•••••V`,•C':.!if"ie V9erfi)t'.s'c{:10.'" ____..._•17... .7.,..1....e_,ou...y-• ,--,--...•&IN V. ..•00000 .,;1 P.N.Z:.AV; 0,%..it,...:;‘,..S.:3;,..f.:,!),5• ••_4•1.. . .---.--.--..••....,. •,.....e.::.e r.02/5 cA.0 ...i14. .„ir,.....7,:i4 i•4 1:0:1 , i i 1111,,v-°0°8:69)", ,'0;AWaik,. ..4`T••,"?oc;a3.!A `r$ .<,.. ".., 0 •- `4'..3 f.:ciN 'Vellek•r6PSP•c".' 1111111r1111111.000 . * .00. •00. ,3•',,,,, ,...„'. ..,,.,Y,,,D-?.ei)0(?*,:,`,:,• '.%`•;' • •'..n••• ..' -• --.....- ,f:,1,...e/n.,le_ry r;* I. . ..00 .F...t.... ; .., •,....,...,000. ., .0, ,....No.0.3.. • q el 0•., ,,C.:12.2 t 2 k. ,..... ,t, -..., . .,.• ... ..„1.4w. • Infill:./..';..,"- 4,';•'?',;(-0,•,':, 6)l'''',•riti••0•i')••' 9:0e) •.. •a2',;. ',4•P/ '•••••• .'•-••:1'..:,.Le:Av.,,..., , • , ,v.. II •-liric.11: . .63,:,,c1.•:014.:1 '„.6:-•''',,VISN'••".*:.6C,•.,•"1:10`;',`') .'..).J f...,ia„'t''.7-Y.,..ii ' , '' fir,.Vr?'" , .',.ic.4:'!rum:mei"' nin, i '; .'''?'A'''.. c. •..f" .. 0.,.... •,„••42.0 ,o.'..,•.0 9?(.., 6.,.2.61,....c.i.,.,2...0.o,.,',....,seo b •-•'•, .S.0 I r .....:.:..... ' •••,,) , •" ,et•^ '''', t)C.:‘t•1•:••0 p.,-A,%),;,,,..•<f?'-I"' ',-;"°•••"I.11,14E.>,',;5/,,••,.,,,, ,1,..p-n.,,,/).1... t" ••'•'''':•:':*'••• •t•'-'•C",•L'•..''6'•••°:•1•61,*1,?•• ,"6.g..1••" • •"•'(1.3.•11!c ••'••'11.• lei•`":•,i,ict.2.'; ,•.,c:!•••0;1..., 4 It •••.:;.--ri., . •••er,er ' 1 *11'..,a-i • ' •;•;.;.;.;;;;.;.::::::.. ' )f•o•1...,- ' , -;•S30'''•' '' •• O'for•zo i 'Q v '?,. '.,a''''•t9 a.4)Pi"..,4-‘• ; ''',. ..e."-,:-,0• 1 ' ..::i:i*Mi:iii:iiiiii:::1: ' ' l?' ,;','," .1,1 t',';''',,.!'o's .flodnonon• .'•,,. -.,,----....,__, - '...1:,,°•0,1,,,*•.,,q..: ,,, , 12:-, 174LNINNAIN a........•-. ,..4::.M.:Miiiiiiiii:it.:... , S'Pl:'.1?..c" ' . c ...b0O-O-60-%°•“.11.- ' ' .::::MiiV:iiiiiiiin:$1,1).:1'.i'.6‘V 4, -_, 0:411i1161:411:15!...-;i4OWTTr ..;:e6illi%?f,5c 'AV. ',,,':. 'Pa? •"z:::miu::,2 .b.;".•,3•.;. tv 0\ 44 p' ,i , .....,:.,,,•,,: •000 ?,•,o, 000. ...._ 'Ve AIIIIII&., , ............x.,..................A ..,i•:,1., .0.0... .p.,t;N ,..0° ,,,I,,, 4,..) •..• , 1 .).,. . ___ , . 4„al -'''N .tiii:iiii::.:::''..:::'::.:::.i:i:.ii ,1 ?;.7.7-'71()',• ' '1 ot, ••:•::::::::::::::::::..I. A .0 0:4),. 4.•0.0• *,:.,,,,,. r. . _ _„.... I..k '••;'12°''kS., °IL . '''47"ri:': •..:•ii"'ji:•'''. --..."---__•: 1 „,, .00_00_00.0. \ '..e;0`i .q•In'C'''..',.. 12."1 .i'i''•'q.'•1''Q.''•/1 NI 000,00000.• ; e ....-- V,„.,c 11 ' ')ig;217,"ii - -: ---_=_3 t? En. . 0 :.:*,..,',.,:, .,..z. ,. .--:-.1.-:-ir.:P.,...,..,:. mw''''''. ! 00°0 •: :.::::.::•:.:..c. . •:,:•.: • mir . 0000 , .:;i::::::•::-:*.... ,,,,,..• .,--- t':ii:•,, S Vo° 4.:',Viii:::::.51'„' ' LAND USE ELEMENT ---..-: I .••.„,-:‘-_:--.-_,--•-_.--=-.--__--1-_--.-,.=-. 1,‘,;:6,,:'',':,'-',...'-.:'n„",•-.-•-., 1:...i.";..: ::•:..:•i•:Ji:•.i•i.:!.•:::0 4 ____ :.% i.,.. . I Single Family •,,•••••••1., Commercial ..,,... 1. . 00000 : • - ..ca08, .. .' 5.:Qoci i '.ii :i.:iii:ii Low Density ' 1 -------- -:- '0,- .,-. Office / Office Park • -• ..:.::::::::::::::::: --_--=-:- .-. -..-_-:,;:z i '.-,:,., • •:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:. Multi-Family ... •--- __-- •-• , . ,k,,, • . ei•,, ' .0000000 •) '''',,, :•?:4':iiiii.:..W Medium Density .............. 00c,0000. .00.0000.0.0000, Public/Quasi-Public . MU RI-Family .c,c,00000 00000.0. t • ' . .. . . , , •,•••:•,:::::::::::::,,,, • _ „...,, --, • , Alimmi High Density •.0•00 • 1 „.•,:::::::::.::::,..„::::::, ---- Light Industrial . . .,,.....,........:::::...:. Multi-Family eooO•o • 7------- - -•-- ..A.,„: .1 , . . , • ::.--: 1;-.-. awl ::.::.::::-::•ii:i:ii:i::.. , - 1,,,,t Recreation • v 0 (30°0°G Heavy Industrial ...0 0 0 .,•:.:•:.•::'..:•:::::::...N; . ,,;!* • . , E---2::".-- .:si4, r•.'•'.' '; Wig ':'::::.•i'.f•i::.::::.::.:::ii.*:.,1 *'•• ...................... ------All '.6-.c'''':'°-•" ! --- Awning • •°°°°• ' ' ;..".,;..,.„:'.;:. .• ''•a iir; .:::::*:' ,c•, f ---_-- r Greenbelt - Manufacturing Park irk ii, .93o0o0009:pao0o2 :,.:, , .'-• • , • ' II 11, 000000000000000.:$ '•I'• / Multiple Option., ,•..; loof,:,-,•:„. ........... ..00‘,..• , • . ,• , Nom 9,00000.0810.. 4,,,k.../ ,;lit .,.•., 11 - .•t.4:2, ---• . -:•%•:••.1.7••W „..,• ,0", fi•A' ,..-..,, . Revised .April 1985 •• . 0%••• •:.0000 ,.,,N.,.... ,.p.4,..k.,..-.e.... N...4_, . •=. . . • ---- . , . . .".•,• • . . • N t• .5....c.. .....7: ....... . \•• :, i ;.* f/... ;a •*. .*"'.1••.„, ",.... Z4 '''..` II \ ,' ft,/''Si , l I' _ .„,,,,,,,..!----,• ,.. ..? '4.4 k 1 -1 ,a , .- 1.• s,• , . l'i. ‘.---Z., ,,:••,-. )- ''' ./ , 7, ,:5, •• "..k \ 1 N.'.'::--, :i,/ , ,,, , c' -ei ‘.. •;\4/ ) ,- , '' ‘ ..r. ' !' .. ' / •, q• ' i e,54,11, 0 •vi.l....!1:_...-'•2,0/ ;,'''''T ., I '1'2'• ‘'', - - a e.' .V. 1*.A..-7 ‘ 0 ..1 ', ' if777(..1.' • i 'k.,4 - -f•. i'4'07..'). / '„\11 /11;r! '• ..:••i/ ., • v,,,,,,. v .1. / ' A- -. •l''',.';''s,' /1;-\: ' '.= ' ,'.. ; • ,, ...., 1J-:, 1 •,y -. ,/,,, ''., :/., .2: , , („/--) , ,„.,,,j,y• \ &I 0 .4 , ,,,,, , _.• " /. - 't' ' dt V b '/' .$0 ''<../. 111(\ . % 1, • ', /..,0 ,.6, ,,,,,,,,,, .,„; ,\• ,• / •, ,,•‘ 1 ), hit,),-. ,..1, ' 0 ..•' •"/;:' ., ".\'a •i .•. ,,,\ ://, . .\L 1 II • ‘,/ ::,, / ,.....,A,.//e t•‘,' , ,\,.a ) / ,•,..•. e, \ 1 s ..• t .}31‘. /..• 441,...,./ .:s ,, . ,p,) b. % /1" ,';.,'" ' •''', A N N, ///, ... ,,, , \' /..., ,'', • ' ' .4 I,i" /.., ,I .,...,...................,/\ ../ r:;,/ ... '.., ,..4,-. ./, •f(„• -Q. . Iiil .,,,,/,'"...; ...„'\•••-•;•.--'4g..,„/::,:s\ ,,, , .7., \t.....;,, • .• ./.;,, ' .4, \•:‘,., z, 4.-„,...W.• 9:i /'' '.1/4\`',%,:•;4,.-".„X \ .... "`"',..7'',,,,,':','c.•‘\,,,I"::,\ ' ‘%'„ •,,;• ,/,- •,,./ . •.-- ‘ • ''• ,...,1;„. ,,!•.:0;',/,'- --• 6\ •• ', ••'.•4;1..' " 'll!''‘i.1 \ • .-\ .::'<:' , „ f.s-- . t/...-•• •,,t ,,,,....,, .\,.•,‘,. -„,/,-...., €1) ' \ .,,, 6,". ,' ..),?\ \,.. •?-61„,. •',.,:,?.X..`,n,`,,, -';','"•,\,,,„ ,:rt. -,,,,,,..0,.. .. \ .41 \ \ $\it•:\s•\% ‘, , ,\ \:..: ,,,,,,,A-,,..\,,,,::- \ .. ,.‘. ..(/:.0.,;- :::0! „\\./. ..,,, ,..s. ,, ,4,,i .., • ,„... ;:, . m , ,,,,,,z,., \\\\\0‹,..-A,4 .„,..:,,,- ., .. ....„,,,,,.. ,. ,:,..1—x, .,,,,,,..„,, „;•,,, \,,.: ...., . ,,, ..\\ -,.:\,,,-k. , \•„,,,,...-„, s.,,,,,, ,,,,,..,,,...‘",. 0,-/m-,,,,,,,,,,,,?.,. ,,,,,,c,,, hi! 1 41 1 ,a \..,''','' '7...,\i,') ,q. .• \ ''''.. \ ,*. ,, .,‘-'4(;:',%1 • \\-/ . / 'T '1 /.?• \':',./ ' ,.... i, ii i \ `•\''',\ \",.\(, `\, er,,,";7',/k‘ 0 A ••••,,', '4,',)•••,ii; •,;',s, ,,f, .*•• \'" '4 -,(4•/, \ . Ili "1 ,-, •, t•t ''''-i G •?•ta' •<,,••, \ ... r'' -.t \'..,".• P I . I .t,'61,: \C `." \\."it , '<`.` '.s k ,.••,....r '-,',': , ,i/.; •k, ki i •v` • \ • s.: ':\'7° \ , •„-,. \ ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,•)s ../ •s‘ /,.,, •,.,,c's,:„.\ pi .1. i': p ,• i 1 .1"enliq. t.• \ '4,,,, ‘:\p'. . \NV• s, i s\\*..i.;''/' .1,1 ' \..,. ,,,,,, ,.„ ,...• ‘, C's,„, r, ,, , si• •••1 . •t,-el• S pti4,i,,. ,.' •.\ ,. 0, .,.. ; ;', \\, • \ s ,,,, .\ ,;,`•\\, ‘ ,• \•,‘,,,,,, (.. '`'i t:'-1'l• , I/0 I 11, (< \ \\\\ \‘‘ ,.`''. * 1/4).:: • • \ \\\, ,,,,,;;;•,' .1 11 J f•`,fl...>' g " P ).-''5,', ,•. • ,„, il,,,,1•.;I: \ v ' , -...il' • :: t• '•,).r• •." ,1i-A \ .,.. „\ ,,.., .. . t: ',, 5,...•1.1 '.; \ ,s,\ ,, ': '0 :; 1:.• ii' ii.)i \ •:.., ., r, • .: t: \;. ,,. ; ,: ;: •. 0, f. \ \ \ . . /1 \, .,,11 /..1 \\ .i \ / \ et 't met No. MEM igillk_ CAMPUS MASTOR PLAN Dote:-•it,,'. Rottlood: 5:-.... 4. ati larAi"...;:.i.gi',t4IN Dan SHIRRS PROPERTY , Drawn:it',....", ..__.• , ! _ ---- I. }.,.1yAlliR AN 4.AFENI MAP L E f V.,LLEY7,..tiGH,ltAY Chog•PP: • • 9 I ; s#j , m y w . ' H-LILAC - - I905 ON•P-AMP 1 �i tsse c rnira i r -- _ --------- r q�^N, 291V.I.WRGt,mAIN- 1 / �I by 1 $ 29_- b_--. _.—__....._ 5_.. _—N ��.. � ,�,._ % • _ __ __ -- - • a - - ''- -, ,,,"� , '� -- --.. /= icy - _ .__ D—Nc. RPG S6 -.� S _ —1�v—y . 0,1 —11' m_ I/ I 9 D D �LL5 T�—91 RDI ST r -,,,..]..I j—IJ I B '7'Oi y'.1. ` `q U tie _,�---- I / I I• i t ///0 rk/1/1-1/_-/fircc�� I `'_ li —� ' III , I / I i' I N IIIIIIIIIIIII - m i s — 3 ;,\ —GIB . ' I / 4r--7-0-+ Fil .::' s -1: III I \ 9 '''• m QI 1 d(/ 1! 1 I j — 4� �..i�,.. 1 — �/ )1 I I i J E! " j ,. al._ ,, I , ,„ j ._,�_ .. _____ j 1 F?I i x91,.;_1 I / / I II _..—" .,?1 �"8'i •="1' ) • •�ip ="�� . I it 1' il/---4 I i /4 Thif'?•-. —1,.; 1 r-J I I l I i rt� — - - g, &- 1 I l I k111-j. I int Ing I ' p ry z c r.. "r: 'h i •'�• ?ogsc 1�l•� „_-,ipAR tuff 4 '' • 4° Ly c o RI1A 1 �g 16 ' d 9 ° Vt3b llu� ••Y Gs P . N n y N qqyy - n ' !''pro -) Itv C • q 1. SITE PLP N ILYCf1 :,LGIJD INN -hENTON °",'.; 517 JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS. INC. 10020 tl(.Ph • 6tlII.u.wpMeil..Csa • 12004 464 • ' 9 9 ]7�^1-3YI1 9 pO ir, A N CY O t I ,9^ r • • PL'�ii1N N�'TIYG WILD 'uPf•::_ G�^ i\-`-rr �� -\'% rs y� ss �; ., ti (. ` is Qr s T `1'S ��� o� 4i k • ' j q � q u In ` D Ei Z • 11 f a dr j 2 - " y „.4„,, NCR717E1-7,ON ` % YfNG M134'Y.eZy±,-..1___ - 'y� ` t b 2; i\ I Vill''/"//' �1 .:',U. . i I�� .� , I o 7 l t� "4 ml ii) ..i=ii> . iNArovait , ',irk::: ,{z,jtp14) B - • V, T 1 0 .y .11 i 1 J 1 n�j .- P iv 0 ° m 17 it �� it • - 0. iJVdQ FE, YL,f,N I v vt.P-,CLOJD INN- heNTON DATE e,aT JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS, INC. • NCTMOIJTH-drINCP) _._. 1•'-. .. 10320 N.E.6W • O.INwa..W blegI n 63101 • P�1 W.3000 i 'ill W D Qj cL1 i e i :. I , 1— 1 • l 1 i --� s I I 1 LH. ' I ril L,— I� o 1 � i • FI, 1-i ,_-_,..-1, . , , ...._ _ , , EE1E2 :__, ,_ ,------ , ___ __, 1,__ ..., k_i ,, ,: , 17:7-1 --1 ‘.,..,_ _ . ,, i , i_A ER ,-_-_-1 ._, t,i� 3 ___I__/ [-,,3 ,..._, - — cl i = - I - {- ' 1-= _,/ FP 0 ! 1 Z — E =1 / 'I' �: .,,:.;; • zUTH ;WC'..aT V ,C. .;ILYE.PI CLOUD INN- N,fNTON DATE JOHN ANDEASOW AND ASSOCIATES PS. INC. '� .CIi 4('1 t1OiTM J _ODINDJ ,i TI t a G7 CANS °ar CHQ EC7' 0 KMMI.CIM • /Mani ManlnpwQMC • CM45130DC .. lit). O . a Fli w I F • Ili!'rilf ilimli ifilf.FI Ta, v _ .. .---- -- is 1 \ ... ' 1 \\ n N T-17I11 1 1I 11 iInIMII J (r7 I I' In,� 1111 II�IL,I !I I'. ,Ii111' PI , _ III IEl 1 � i -fP I_�' ,� 1 _➢ i i �� i -T. .➢ o� i 1 r 09 ice.•, _._ PI � 1111,11'INIII•Ilf — ill; I�IIi' h _ ._ i. IN ' — _ • I .mod ! :t — I,,ILi 1 Iil I ' ' •F•- I -- r \ .. '�� i II i l 1 I. I 1 !�I� I'.I I „CI'• I I .I ' id • I11, pl-.. _ __ _I _ I = to___ _ . I i • IIi ' _ T,,JAI '� ' . 1 . . . iq. ..I • ':_i 1 1 'I_ '10 1 --- /-7-- 1I l- =1 aoan � 114, 4 I. /, E.. :.1. l ,•'i 4. -J NOP-TH ;I'J -TT F 1'N t2.T'C?v,^. JLYC'P, ('1 DUD t INN- F17ON D ATE JiM WW1=t"hiChJT'H• cwNr1; s'S, JONN ANOEflSOH ANO ASSOCIATES PS, INC. • 10050 Ill G01 • Win*,poNgM 11m1 • 002 411 100E • A...MID=OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WESTPARR COFFEE PILING 3 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - ,..$ . c., % E s • IN THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER t• COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO . Sc.:.•-s.2 3 OF 4 , . . C 0 . . . . E d • . . —.-.. .---.. . . -— .-.——.. -.-. oC -••• . -. ......0. . <>< .....:,,,,______1 • _. /. 11.1'- II In..-. 49 II 1 - .--I= "............. .......F--s-.n,_.tz• ...ur, .. et'-'04..o ..-•e-•woq.•,-Z••,,•,o-. o .,o•1. SIDE ELEVATION .a, ."1/4 .1-0" . . . . . . . . CZ .,'.. :7777).: . . . • . . . _. . . _17----.--.__.,......... ...- . ...., 1 _ _... ....... ..... .., -ns. — _ al I 0 "icra .. . . . . ..... . .. • 1.""`Z:-''' ,..`1''''''''' , .NZTo— one,I i .1 ' - ' .. . ' J 1 CO , t..: .7.::;:'''. r....7-evs.c........,..[..t.... . . . ; 1 - ;,+_.."....-..........• 112A CO . - - .... ....,•,... ;-;:::. • -7::.!. •• - - • - O..Erbtr.tr=4;ateslo. ,,,=.O..2. 17,-,,,A........,, _. CAO• i, ....... ` 49 SERVICE ELEVATION 6 .ENTRY 0.4 . F.t. ....,.. ..Ae.rna.pv,r.aec-TIMM- , .. . 1/4`.•l'-0" 1/4 •l-0. glue ril, - _ ..---,,.=---- ,..1.-- .. ., . . ef .°.1 •-•...—f -•—='''-':•."-:, --; :.- 7._ ----.--M-641 RESTAMANT -...... .... ----7-_----• . 0,401-...:..___:__...:_____. I I I 11-I II :I • 1 li I —7.---- li g.. 1. uk ! , , .,,, 1 ,i ,—,.„.......„—,..____ I • , .., •c)i , , , , , I../Ce No 6111 INN.00 tir=4 1.••011C•Pln0 OC•10 room.Onnoono . • -...11111111111 lior• 0 13,e.c. . PTV." TOW • ,O,TOP Or CORO Stall - . _ . _ ._ - __ _ _ _ __ . _ ..__ ._. . _ • t....tt,..----;:z>cr,---). . :. EXTER,OP e ENTRY ELEVATION /4'.•l ......06. Imo.. ESEVATIO 1 ProCCO •-•S•O•I UM I'-0* ..... ......•rosm Sheol No • POOP MP N..wow. NON No.OtTa.enonl TO on.ToT No.. A7 4 . . CITY OF RENTON�� ® Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division December 18, 1987 TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: RaMac, Inc. , Site Proposal File No. ECF-049-87, SA-054-87 In our July 30, 1987, site review of the RaMac, Inc. , site on Maple Valley, this office proposed an assessment fee of $6,300 to upgrade the existing traffic signal at Maple Valley Highway & I-405 on/off ramp by providing a pedestrian signal and pedestrian crossing. Since that review, RaMac, Inc. , has agreed to provide a new traffic signal and pedestrian crossing at their entrance. The Park Department will match their new entrance with the entrance to the RaMac site. Now that the pedestrian crossing will be provided with the new traffic signal , the assessment fee for $6,300 should be deleted from the development requirements. The developer, RaMac, is still to provide the coordination between the new entrance traffic signal and the existing traffic signal at the 1 -405 on/off ramp. 14147 CEM:ad Attachment cc: RaMac, Inc. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2620 �a.P, 1NG DEPARTMENT/D SION : G �G�e_ . 1' ,•:-"VJAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED , ti„S" 1 1 �. Fro vose� �lL4 �cS'�R0,-c. .. IJV,� 2t.,_crci 'c S' U ►��c4��rt C9 f\l. o� cat rat-Lk,% AO ` `,�- Cet-kreo ( . �4\�. V-Q I t 3,.,„ N ��rS No -C,w_. Pao ok.Ce G` Set c c )(L-,1/4eAt ac( o c c QoSS i k ik.(_V.4 . z Z . \ kerc, ►% % NI suk£ic..(Lt * s-ko e 'Vac 0etucCos sot,xL \-3ouL3CQ o u Nt\J N *0 1-,Il zz a a i Us) 1 ?vn f os eacca.c( LC . ----46Wes V�,IIL c_tecti"e C� VACc - CQ te)SC I\C 5 1 be&CI ►L`.S "L "-- IN'tp.. Vo Vati.,L, u�". . 0_.,,u. ?a_-- L4. -\-triQc__ DATE: lc -447 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7? -42- '7/".'`"f�" 0 APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS T APPROVED n l' J -/R.P Jo E. s 1- . L,.e. 1 .:, �.J `:::7?c c e' S < - J (;'(7) N '3 ,-1 S-f-) 4.) b LJ)i C- 1--c 1-1 e.c__ _4._. 71 o .?,,,v.f <0...•-G1/L-P Cam-,..,p (-e- X , 1 —)Y D t'o S.,-. p-a,_, , lac.`, c_Jf-)1. %Z, < 716.y-Ae-ct a 2 -L S 11 I n rc./ S ^/ -/ I-i C21.. , 14);// ,L+-t 614-c_e,--U-4- fL,'Cl- 71c P- - e 2,//O , -S S`,---t k tom. , 7`f a7 o� - //sG •Q ei ' . 7 -7 e 7 /F' ,7 o/. f-- ,53Ve..,t4, 77-, ,�-"��I..5 , `71 is /S- / 4=-- i 1 -� t 1. ^�a y c' �� �y,_�.n�._�..�,' . � J�1•�.+•r`-11-.• c1 e /�� ' E'.V' //'�/L 1;i L.p a c_±- 7 11 a9 S/S .5/,.�rz-�.--R¢/ /-c /`>,-)Lii¢� ? , y a-e,,- 4 ex- S \,,,,-SA ,v z` c e-- R. . .41 r4, C7 -/-a LA_p 9 r�P - �r - T - Lop G lr2.a�� l-va� Ic_ S 1 , 3 � / 2 >�:. �,�-, S� j�.-_.- -eJ�.-,r-� DATE: .� `> ' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATI E$ 4-,• f� y bud/:, 7 9 S .' t Up 7 vao� �o Sky i r� Est , may/ REVISION 5/1982 9 d/,' Q�/.s,4/ '� l�o/wr-•�Z , y.%X �' � F�300 Form 182 0 /,. ,�- �,c.L.r. -Mt ::ev- w}�--•r'1.=rr�zs"'`r'' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 14/L/Ty 4 I&/NEE.'/Alt/ El APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS // NOT APPROVED WATER Pc.AN REQOi a TD /14E67- E ecT 7ionl TAA)L/ DS SET .8S/ UTnui1'APPROVAL SUBJECT TOJ LATE MOM AGREEMENT-clout A/o — /.,IpTEG `/rep-L.N. A J LATE CRIERS ARREEAMEE-SE M /l/o SYSTEM DEYELOPIOEIIT CUM-YMTER w�,s 0/7,r q...0 . !►uN,7 x /AS= 0 20,/Z.5 9 o 00 SYSTEM DEVEUWMENT CHARGE-SEWER, ,ES li .'1-° ,,, UN/T X //S'. 2� S o- SPECIAL AST AREA CHARGE-WATER NO a c op '4i Z. •(74 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER �!p ssyy.p °� 1("/ 2s9-_(- • • C'*i APPROVED WATER PLAN ,BUST. /7/AT& N W- Z3Z ILVel:.-; . ��D, �D,�• oo CDI��• 1PPROVED SPIER PLAN 7-SEGJ Pe441 1/OT'r�_CGEf�7/�246 ci v Less r,''. - ._ - 2' - , n b,o , Cj r l) APPROVED FIRE MUTT LOCATIONS / •" , a , % ,� / 01 FIRE DEFT. Y. S Q , ) 1 \oz," / FIB c FLD nu IS A/O----__)Cafr____ DATE : /71,1 47 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE rc—r..,.11- Anli v 7/77WC ,PEA = 2 6,,4(J. °D Se:•to lik Oil HE/Dsk1 AG12887 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M. : DECEMBER 8, 1987 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. HENDERSON HOMES Application to rezone approximately 2 .8 acres of property from G-1 to R-1. Property located at 4922 and 5020 N.E. 20th Place. File Nos. : ECF-069-87, R-077-87. HENDERSON HOMES INC. , DIVISIONS 3 , 4 , 5, AND 6 Application for preliminary plat approval to subdivide 43 .71- acres of property into 170 single family lots, and two variances to allow two pipe stem lots. Property located north of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and east of 142nd Avenue S.E. if extended. File Nos. : ECF-067-87, V-075- 86, V-076-86, PP-077-86. RAMAC, INC. Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a'.3, 900 sq. ft. restaurant and 40, 000 sq. ft. office building on a 5. 696 acre site. Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. File Nos.. ECF-049-87, SA-054-87. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 8, 1987 APPLICANT: Ramac, Inc. FILE NUMBER: ECF-049-87, SA-054-87 LOCATION: Located on the north side of Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Site approval for development of a 104 room hotel, a 3,9000 sq. ft. restuarant and 40, 000 sq. ft. of office on a 5. 696 acre site. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: RaMac, Inc. 2 . Applicant: RaMac, Inc. 3 . Existing Zoning: B-1, Business Use 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1,General Use, R-1, Residential - Single Family, P-1, Public Use, and L-1, Light Industrial. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial 6. Size of Property: 5.696 acres 7. Access: Maple Valley Highway 8 . Land Use: The site is currently undeveloped except for a foundation for an approved office building. 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multiple Family East: Single Family Building and Zoning Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Ramac, Inc. December 8, 1987 Page 2 South: Cedar River Park West: I-405 C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation date unknown. Rezone to B-1 --- 1522 August 2, 1955 Rezone (R-1 to B-1) R-017-82 3677 November 15, 1982 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: There is a twelve inch water line along Maple Valley Highway near the south property line and a twenty four inch water line along the west and north property lines. b. Sewer: An eight inch sanitary sewer line is located along the west, north and east property lines of the site. A short six inch segment is located along the southeast property line. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water currently drains into the ground and eventually into the Cedar River drainage system. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route No. 143 and 912 operated along the Maple Valley Highway near the south property line. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools:N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High `Schools:N/A 5. Recreation: The Cedar River Park is located across the Maple Valley Highway to the south of the subject property. Building and Zoning Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Ramac, Inc. December 8 , 1987 Page 3 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-711, Business Use, B-1 2 . Section 4-738 , Site Plan Review F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Commereal Areas Objective and Commercial Structure and Site Objective, Commercial Goal, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pgs 16-17 . 2 . Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pgs 55-60. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, RaMac, Inc. is seeking site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3 , 900 sq. ft. restuarant, and a 40, 000 sq. ft. office building on a 5. 696 acre site. 2 . On January 10, 1986, the Hearing Examiner approved a conditional use application (CU-62-86) for a 30, 850 sq. ft. mini, self- storage type warehouse building on this site. 3 . The applicant is submitting a site plan for the whole site but is actually seeking site plan approval for two of the proposed three buildings that will occupy the site at this time. The office building will be submitted for site plan approval later on. No specific plans or elevations have been prepared for this project at this time. 4 . The Environmental Review Commitee, the City' s Responsible Public Official, considered this proposal on October 21, 1987 and issued a Determination of Non-significance - Mitigated with an extensive list of conditions (see Appendix 'A' ) . No member of the public nor the applicant appealed this determination. 5. Section 4-738 (B) 1. of the site plan review ordinance requires all development in the B-1 zone to have site plan review. Also, Section 4-738 (C) 8 . requires developments having more than 25, 000 sq. ft. of gross floor area in the B-1 Zone, or more than 300 parking stalls, to be heard by the Hearing Examiner at a public hearing. Building and Zoning Department • Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Ramac, Inc. December 8, 1987 Page 4 Site Approval Criteria 6. Section 4-738 (D,1) lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Approval application. These include the following: a. General Criteria: 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; Commercial Area Policies No.s 3 . (encouraging planned clusters of commercial development) , 4. (these areas should be designed to minimize travel and congestion) , 5. (good access and circulation as well as parking and loading facilties should be provided) , 6. (such facilties should not be located near facilities that require a high degress of safety or traffic control) , 10. (various uses should be compatible with each other) , 11. (joint parking should be encouraged) , and 12. (encouraging a common design and landscape theme) are applicable. With the conditions recommended herein as well as those already imposed by the ERC Staff believe this proposal will comply with these provisions. Under the Commercial structure policies, Policies No.s 3 . (pertaining to setbacks and buffering from other uses) and 4. (pertaining to the efficient and functional use of the land) Staff believe the subject proposal can be made to conform. Under the Commercial Development Policies of the Northeast Plan the - subject proposal appears to comply with those that are most relevant including: (4) , which addresses minimizing access points along major arterials, and (8) , which recommends locating retail commercial uses immediately east of the Cedar River Park rather than in a strip fashion along the highway. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; 1 Building and Zoning Department , Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Ramac, Inc. December 8, 1987 Page 5 The subject proposal was found by Building and Zoning staff to comply with the land use regulations of the B-i Zone in which the development is located. All use, building setbacks, lot coverage, , building height, and parking provisions have been met or surpassed. Whereas staff estimate a need for 321 parking spaces, for example, the applicant is proposing to provide 346 spaces on site. 3 . Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; As noted above, a number of conditions were imposed on the applicant by the Environmental Review Committee which specifically address impacts to surrounding properties and uses. These include: Conditions No.s 1. (requiring a mitigation fee for restructuring the existing traffic signal at SR-169) , 2. (requiring the design and installation of a new traffic signal at the entrance to Park Place that accomodates a pedestrian crosswalk) , 6. (requiring the applicant to provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year storm or 24 hour duration) ,8. (requiring a vehicular separated pedestrain linkage between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north) , and 10. (requiring the applicant to provide screening of all roof-top mechnical equipment, building and parking area lighting, and glare from parked cars that might be visible from residential properties to the east of the site on the nearby ridge) . Staff believe these measures adequately address impacts to surrounding properties. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; A number of the mitigation conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee also addressed impacts that were self-directed to the site. These included Conditions No.s 7 . (requiring that hotel units facing the I-405 on-ramp have interior noise levels of 40 dBA or less) , 9. (requiring that a system of clearly delineated pedestrain routes be established connecting all building on the site) , and // Building and Zoning Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Ramac, Inc. December 8, 1987 Page 6 11. (requirin.g more thematic design continuity and landscaping to improve the aesthetic impacts from this development) . In addition to the above, Staff are recommending that the applicant be required to provide a pedestrian linkage to the crosswalk that will connect this site to the Renton Community Center and Carco Theatre complex across the Maple Valley Highway, and ensure that all signage is architecturally integrated into the building designs rather than being applied as separate appendages• at a later date. Free standing signs should be discourages as should roof top signs 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject proposal, should, with the incorporation of the ERC mitigation conditions and others imposed as a result of this report, enhance area-wide property values. Staff believe this development, if properly designed, can be a positive adjunct to the nearby Cedar River Park complex and will contribute more visually to the surrounding area than a self-storage warehouse would have. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; This was a major issue of concern to the Environmental Review Committee. Traffic safety associated with egress and ingress to the site from Maple Valley Highway as well as that of pedestrians trying to cross the highway from either the restaurant or the hotel to stroll in the nearby park or see a play was of real concern to Committee members. Also at issue was that of safe pedestrian circulation between buildings and through parking lot areas. Staff believe the specific mitigation measures required by the ERC, if followed, will ensure reasonable safety and efficienty of vehicular and pedes-trian circulation. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; Staff believe the subject proposal will provide good light and air exposure to the occupants of all the buildings proposed on site. Because of the site's relative isolation, topographically, no adverse Building and Zoning Department , Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Ramac, Inc. December 8, 1987 Page 7 'shadow impacts are expected on nearby properties. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The subject proposal. is not anticipated to have any adverse effects in terms of noise, odors or glare, for example, on nearby properties. A 40'-50 ' bluff separates the site from the Monterey Terrace subdivision to the immediate east. This vertical separation plus the fact that this bluff is currently heavily treed should ensure that noise associated with the restaurant or hotel will not be a problem. The restaurant will generate some odors of cooking foods, but air quality ventilation devices should ensure that levels are kept to a mimimum. 9. Availability of public services and facilities facilities to accommoda and As noted above, the subject site appears to be adequately served with sanitary sewer, water, power, and public transit. Emergency vehicular access will be provided off Maple Valley Highway with secondary access provided through a gated entryway at Bronson Way N.E. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. As noted above, if the mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee are followed and implemented, the subject proposal is likely to enhance property values and reduce the likelihood of neighborhood deterioration. Development of the site should improve the appearance of; the area if an approved landscape plan is • developed and followed. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above review and analysis Staff are recommending approval at this. time only for the proposed 115 room hotel portion of the site and then with the following conditions, some of which apply to the whole site, and some of which apply to the design of the hotel structure itself and its landscaping: Building and Zoning Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Public Hearing Ramac, Inc. December 8, 1987 Page 8 1. That the mitigation measures or conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee be followed on all phases of development on this 5. 696 acre site; 2 . That a master site plan for the whole site be developed and approved by the City' s landscape architect prior to the issuance of a building permit for any phase of development on the site; 3 . That additional open space, vehicular and pedestrian circulation space be provided on site by removing the excess parking now shown on the applicant 's site plan. Staff are recommending additional aisles and planters to deleniate said aisles. 4 . That a clearly deleniated pedestrain circulation corridor be provided connecting the linkages between the proposed three buildings to the proposed crosswalk across Maple Valley Highway at the new traffic signal; 5. That the trail right-of-way along the east edge of the property be upgraded to a first class landscaped walkway acceptable to the City' s landscape architect; and 6. That the propose Silver Cloud Hotel be re-designed so that its vertical pylons or piers have greater depth so as to be more thematically related to those on the proposed Shari 's restaurant building. • // s 441.1 . :-"„ , _4 4 . .r _1:_ri . .)—.72 I .In,„,>.F-1-- I I ri, : --) -N. •‘_,.. . L-1 / , , i' � :; 1► .1 1 :; :;1C11. E.::".7.—1:...30 40-14.4 . 126.7191.1317 /. /7/7 . .. ; ,‘ . '''Z; — . J :l (L It _ —.. Q il tr_. : 1,/ i,/ 1 • ' 6'.'.. _i_j, vtlq... . H--- ____il.i :r—IZ r4. ''I ,16. ,..•_ r, i #4, /. 0,N ' i 1 .. 41'CICI•A . .3.12 a• WI 3— 3 ' 4.-" . I i /t 1 1 , tsl% „ .••f' L.dii001001r, %, .:•11, l• . JEV.:3„, Frii ': 41 E . -. . , . I .A.P.,,, e 0 ....._,L1.3 - r 1 . ' '. , 4, �` \ \ /r.r- �I•!I T t W,,— \gyp „7 3', ` 2 11: 7::ff,-'-':-H11':' , : 4400 LIBERTY?0 // ''` '' i t \ •` 4 1 r / - i�,:•e � 4•y r syt I METERY':, . - PARK ', P pD"1-'.A P® P CEDAR' RIVER 3 Y : fr4 PARK \• 4 TsI,It : ., I I I� .`,, , ,, t-6.1 .; • ' 04,./y '.-r* , - ". ',.• 1. lr...„.• , ::::',' , —''''''' -, . ---- --x--. ----„, .. / .N'----------=-".. - E, 1 III Q'=__ Ip \N\�"Q �— '� ` S • 1414 I 1 — �. is=." If ,1J I i t. e6. i I4 :� M ! II.-- 8 i13 40 I 19 �" 4� Lk.— p • .0 _ __ _ • RaMac, Incorporated SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-054-87 • t • • APPLICANT • RaMac Incorporated TOTAL AREA 5.7 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Maple Valley Highway EXISTING ZONING B-1, Business Use t, EXISTING USE Undeveloped, partial foundation of oi`d building permit in place. . PROPOSED USE Hotel , Restaurant and Office Building. . . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial - COMMENTS Application for site plan approval for the construction of a 104 room hotel , a 3,900 square foot restauant and a 40,000 square foot office building. Located north of Maple Valley .Highway and east of the on-ramp to 1-405. rj ''S 14' ' f'•••.:.::ii 7.. I I . ..4. ' •1_-..7s--- , . - A= I r• . ,t, li - -•::::c. :,,... . %. lat0,:::::.;•ir,,, , I :-.--•! 111.1111.-- -7. ,.. I-SP- f,:•t''... • %. .tre<1: ', I .- -.:.:.:::Iiiiii:'; ...,..::'•'-;:,,,:',;,1 , Wail. • LAKE .4., V,::::Z.! N., 4? • 1 9,-I.:.i:?. 3 ,,'''''.'..'.• :•:::::,..;•::. .1.7.11:,. VI7Olit:::e....... ."r '.t' 1 ... :.0.-Z: ‘'1114 . / :..?'•0 0'1 ..........i.' %,..C::..:t•,.... 1, i t '.s. ;/ o o o• _ •II:;••••• 'l ..:',.i„...12,;17. NU 11 ij :i,C. SH1NGTON . .: 1 •.k , 1.;•C: . ...,,..0..,•••,•:•:-. t. ..,.- ., 1. , pj ,.., -----• '' `'.• ....-=-:.:.1:::.:.a::.:.?::.qngt;'; •- ,, .411_4 Sam ' ggi3/4/11111/ ' 111111111111 i'1.".2,:mainsi . ..• UMW i ..7,•:,-..-• i tot,11111111P4, . IR::: .f. • r. 1 rig •.: Pil ••••• tall, ' •0000. ' IOWA 1..0 c ocap. A 81,f limos , , glItt11., !Mir/ 'fifiraiiiiii-iiit .'. :::.:i::1•K:';:i:i* ass., ' CC-6-6 • • •AtIl'' ‘\.r 4,4b.41111110*:::ni:1,7,,'---,j.40 um NI ,I HIM i::;::.?:::.g::::::Nin' ,.. .•0 _.,.- , 0 0 0 0 G 0 4,.. , • f:::::.:.„ ...., :iii::::i$,I: FA Joel Ns... •--- " • 0 • • • • •' '...• ..:i:::***::.:::.%::'::i.r4P.P_!,;'71-',--.1,:i::::Kii:';: it/Awn...ow NEE ' ...-• :.:, . _.....-• .._•••...- o o o e e • - o 0 .,;,/, Aii.:riiii,11,:ii i:::i:a 1,.1:4 ,• ! t • , -- Am , so oomee ,. ••, 00 , II 00.0' • • o o o o o o • • 0 ,o e..) .• .,,,- /::iii:iiii.;.: -;-.L........k_mow 1 'i.:14.1074:rili 1\1 Ilia \ .:°00.02.'•o • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., Ck 0 all ; ' . N:i:il, ."•::•,.. 401^.11.7...92 11111116/imma C.11 r . °o°°o°° o o o 0 o o o o 0 • 0 0 0 0 : ,y, I x:i..:::::::•ioyio? 1 ••••:::..:., funif.S. . 4 i. ,•,,°0„°0,,cb••1, . • 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 *. 0\0 • • ', :::K:i*.i* I., ;Ara;INE IL.....-a jrilliitiot t • .i crop:ye-0,-0g.. oe) 0000000 4, 00\ 00 . i .:::::::::::. SIM :.... fti, MILES[I, 'lgolgogogog 4. o o o o o o 0 0 e t t. ii.ogogogo20; • o o o o o o o o o to o o,ei•r, :•:•::iii) 000000000o e o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 , ,; :?,i ----•••••,..--• -7 -‘•••Wil .....k :Ail.0-00000;0000000000:04. . .1 •.'411f.ogogogogolt,% .2 Fypool.Jo,o o 0 0 v o o o o o -;,,. ••; Mil etc::T.000.1 IIIIIh 4 ',,, 0 0000 00 0 0 0 , c ., 000000000.,.. .o o '0 o • o • 0 o 0 o o_0 0. 0 •, . .. ...0_41AH .......4::in..,!..:0;.).00, 21;:oors°01::ocieoisoci..00•2001.2:000i0‘,04.42:7100°:. L00:0°0.0:0:000:50:00':.:I:.l.nk.i.:et;:::4.111.1.:1,:::G.i.14°0°.1:6:'00:1A:::1::.-6-0;141:11::06,!ti.ci:::2:11::3I'li. :2::4. 111:iiii:'11111111::.....,......--.•:•-:.'.:.::1111.1-:'":iA-°°°°°° °°::::;'''':1°Ii°11°11°11°11°1° °1°.1°1111°11°°11!": ::11111:::111-.1111:-:'-'41::.-mi.::::.-11:ENik::::-.:11:::::i111:::111:::.)-::....i':::':.*:::*.:141.::".::::::.1.:::.:.:::::::'‘::::..i.:::::::1::;:::•••••:'.:: ::71i'f,c7..,..i.:.°::'i:'..ic *:S.ggigg83n•- .of)oc3o°o.o°44)06)o'0"- '0'01 Otio. 111111/......._ is... .d.00000.•owl ,..;,.., l?g000gogoO . e o o o 0 000 , 0 0 0 e 0 G J, .\ WWII r**_,.,. .0._0:10111110 fg.. :11111111 - • o o o o • 11141. :,... .!;:-..'ggggigi,g.;;P4' • 6°0'2°420 " 0••••4 '.Y.°v.°0°0tDoboClo'.';c' \ ti. •.MINIAll 111111111111N/ :: .6, it gigiggg'2,ggfiRgg;7ififfilliWIL:..1Qm,PsvONA1 _1 I .: :gggg2ggigig`i:- ,1%Mg.4111'Ailitlf---':'1.° '1 r.:-il:, '',;' .-T.::::...-.L..:.::::iiiimi.:7.....'`: 0.8.0.0.0.0.00000000: 1:::::._•ji:::::,:si ....ii: :gogis,c6,80k5gggg%.4. „g ::bri 11E::,: gitt,z,=,,,, ire,1.. ..: ... .:.:..: .:. .ii:.:::::.....0,.....:..:::: ..0000000000000-00000.000-..0.0010000000000000000000000, ,, 1 ICIial 6:3:g°122ggggggg";(:)‘.44'''...°2.1' 11931irlir ' 44 wq:i'l ,.:...-i.::igilio I':00:00:000.008.0:00000000.000000000::000.00000:0000000:00.:000:4000.00.: ill:g-6g6gogogo.gomogoo-„ ,q...,,,. Li. „wily, ,. ,, ,,,,, MI.- . •-,°"."'111°.40,44i4.1 Al ill:11111aff1111 A ' . e. ' :::':::.ii:iiiiii:iii:iiiiiii i•::::.'094o°o°o°o°o°o°...o°o°o°o°o o o o o o 1•:.:::::. .°.°o* iriellilla Adlifidhl#11111, ,Z,....,:j. gri IIIIMOU1111911110.411 4., 10Eitaffle........ . diVA,\:::::::::::::::::::::::::::%::: •0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000300000.. • .411 IRE. I, 0*....43.34, Malt 11,,,,P:•7.,V' IV'4. ,ill .,rel . il..•:'":::::::::::::::::,:::*; •°00°00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'It:::::::?:.:.:.:.:.:. '‘.;.1 I .' -414Mtill"mi "----',-1' 1144 1.."..."aii iiiiir..N*7"'''''') iI, 'AI! ' -•:// / .1....L.;01,P.-. ;.::i:i:X:i:::::::::::•0 0 0 0 0 0000000 000000000000000000000, .:.:,:.:.:,:::.::::: 1 '04111aelnlot-•••,__....i•,;0;0;0;, 1: •.10•111116Ws All ilry,',....,„f •• .*-111) ,Oil ......."0,' ...0°..r,. :41.::::K:iff.i:i:ii?;i:::.i:i ,_...°•°•°•°°.. •.°,.o o 0 o 0 0(Too. ,i .:::::::::::::':::::: ' •' ,:11:n.z,o;ogogogogo; ,,,411:11..,-w.A-1%,,,ity.,.._...,L..,, 4 . •.,:‘,914 °.,.1 w ',.'"..0%°..d.1.--,'....Mii.ii.:ii i:: .". " ',:;•):."0°0°093°0°0°...0_0_, '... '.::::..........:.:::::::: it ! In,......L ogo°000°,0gog 1..imilmoill.Nrc,:..ray.,'f '7,',,iti-;...... . ,i,, ::.:.::if::.::itif::-::.:.:i:K . ,i .Po°0°0°0°093-813.! 4.2, •:::..'•:•:•.•:•:•:•: 1 1 i ‘1.‘y., ... . M la.lam ''•c'g°g°o°o°o i, a':Illamailmalla •' 1:4& \t. 4 iii, ..,::...:::.:..t, :::::::::::::::::::::::::: . .I C N ill";° \ .41"11111112"...rq' •4 e 04,,,. < mni., •:::::::::::::::::::::::::. ,:'87 ,'5'°..°.°c%°.-.,6 :•:•:•:.......:•:•:::. . _ , , um!, k, .. •MI•t111111111111r4/ .0•••7.•:••2': i:-::i-i::i-i::i.l.ii.li..,-.1.riit.f ela7wm!iiIineimlvsli•.o-iz/.l. tiM.i.iIn.iMI.fM•i!t•irma..I'IE ei0r.;..;°,00.,1.,.,,„•/ 11 ::::::::MIMIIIMP111 Nomaac ,, ,3f•.„,.,-.-i.3`3,,;-.'.,...1,.0 .f.4.L...4,,"',•.,..•.4,1'•.1.,...A.'..'. •'?4..,'.',..L.. .':*'.e,.,.:3.ii:a3•i••:•§•..:i.Pi::,F.:••..C• •'::'.:::::•:::::•:i:::•:i:::.:i:::.:X::•:::•::::•:X::::.:::'.:.::,',7••'• : 0 ' „ 3 „ , ,?•e l.c?,Yr?..1 I''•3":.;.f-,,.f,...c.'..-''r3',6,,.,c,,.,3,7'.r::.5•'..2.,4..,e;6..=7 6.;.4',=I..1.....P•).:, :.:••.•::.:::•::.:::•::.:•:•::.:::•::•:•:•::•:•:•::.:•:••:•:•:••:.:::,•:..:;:.•::.:. memeggik (2•?;•,a,. r`',;Q,35:?::,5,3.,2":?","?.?';',;;;;,(9).044`;'!?;k3', :•::::.::::: ::: :,:.atirrallavalSgX*2)4..-•:-11114:030P-LICY, i:1),..,:i., ;,,gin•:„,,?•••rk411.1.4,:pil,-...,,,,,...---;?•'ry.:A..1-3,‘..?••,-,.1",-,4,,,lb:•::•;!.;rifi,dir•-4:,,,-;??,„,,P.,..'..:..:K:•:?.: 1.111111110 ,,,,,;, IA----..10:1111:,-.A.111-Irr,';.-liag!!!!!1 ..,.,4•••,.: ..,..,..• , ... .r?.p ,.• ,.1.`- •,..,r•F •••• •`" •••,...%• . ......:•:•• 0."0'.6.(.: ''W'r?;4,,:,V,pg' ......!,4•!'fi,••,.. ..' -;••if.:4;.,',Y•••' ' ' i••••--, ''0 csi:sci s 91- ...4 rr_in, s um-----lowboys ism mmmmmm'vaunt Cs.:.0:M• .-;••4P 11l.i',iA WO!I, 1. 411-:1...6'..'.•.1:'''•:..3....q..eP,,:•'' ' • 6•.r7a k•.•:„;.,: .1' .''41. ' ff irTil:71-..9'''C'I'"'.I I: 1„,1,,•,. 111111••mmmmm 8,3/1!.....• ,.....V....skt,,e,., W. • f I mm go ,=v ,,...t. . . . .i..?..),N',-•Ic " '4..'vigniii..--,"s.c.,,,../.„''ki"4,. "..•n.,••• • ' (I ...,..:',..1.•,V''';,,.f.,,to r.''' Imo.mmmmmmm L simr,' .„.$4::.::::: ?.,:i':::: G'. f. I tio,ive,,,,•0. ' 0. itoc,,, - to er.N.A.-' ' ii`,.. . .!,..(.,,,a, ,, , ,,,,,.....mmmmmmm...,,,a:,,,„„,:,,.,,,c,.,:, x,- jip .1 q„,.1.,,.,;.....„r,..0., ,4.1., .., 01;•.,,, 4.f.,. • , z....1„... .' t"''k vii APT6.4.; . "1"v:4'',j%:*:, sureme,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,0; _dr i ' •.(12.,‘,.?:,•,9:.;';'..,,no e. , ' . .- ,, .'• . , ,‘ ...AI..1,,„ 444",;7,-',-,....‹..i...-.At.,c."....,,c,v,.: ,,..u. .. 4, ..4, • , j, - or kkk:'.`=MTA;%'i ral .,!' 1 ' l'i•P•4,..));?Y'%(1.44:1A,,:te .:4‘...t'•It;11:,?.;.,e?t'l,i;•"*O. ''. 4isiviik.e\-.Z;4. •cc..t. •-•!...!(,,s.... ,.. 11 %al.111,:t.PaUt001;" s I t.. . 'Po:,)q1'.',"-i?.V.,,,,.,•if‘,fj:',, ,,,V1,,v;',,,,A..,-.7.6''..5'r• . -<';'''''4-•`-,• -',..1.,P47,g.i:e.P:. -'1' "..r. -,.." ____.....r.-....0!.....k....."-„,.,•• ...,..-4:,:;,gzw2 .,,i - 1 illeililer':go.7111111111111,,,,," .,1 it !.:,0.0000000... b t.,1,).,ktv`1."cii",,3.*.sr,'.`',,fii,v,!;`,;. '..t.;....."----\ ',...1'•t:cci,gfs pfin ' i."0,$.44, •. - •t , iv, 1:gii .. 't ..,:',.,..,:;.i,Y,,i1,-.`ty.:-,;%`'‘:(:lo'c:,`,1-Ircc,.*-Z5,`V.V.,:rf}„•:,".. •:•.& ,-:". 4,, t.1.• kii:...FiC:;3"4,tefn• • .000 IIIIIIWAREMI t ei•e•soot). <2 0.404.s. ; • Wel',"ri .41,t;Is .7' • . . ' • .r•-1.•'"4-•'.(1.,‘ •-, ''' ::::1111.11:11:14,:,.--?"'... • 44 ,, , 111 ''. ' •q *. ..i;*Mi,•••,::',..t- 6;a.1". 0‘".*...9.c:'"A•,•••••680••••3 ;'v.''•-•,/ , ,...c,,,O''''#' . • aomoomml ::::' if ' f' ?,,- -.. c. .r." -r-•-`•''ci,f.-03r... RI'•`!;',','.ef.“_'•.%0.:`',•:).,?.!`.45'z'•rgi 4-,,).'''..b'•e'd".„,,c,f.,'.% - ' -Cr'' •..P..6 r.,„:,7...••••• -• •,,,,,1 . ..;.;.;...., v ••e,,y „, •..,,,„,.•v,•.,••-, ' o 4 ,•:,:„zsl°,^,i,..1,6•.•qf -1-' •••.°r?,°•••."0t.40.fp,•ve•0;.;„4,-,9•,,I,...&, 14 • • ..., . e,..„.., 411:01`;1 .•:••••.....x.:•:•.. •.e....,•0•I.,•v.,••,•,.,•,..„.,0,,,,,• , , • .,,•• ,v,,,v,eh',••:!e,..(>0. el/47.••••>,CD y.,.. '\.3„,9•••, 1 S, •• .•:.:•:::•:.:.•.•:•:•:•:.:-.• • )c.,,,,,•••••,,••‘,<,•„.„,,,,,•:,; ci„.•,;.••J•,.. E31?;„v,ii.;•,.,,•,,,e •‘?....1.>„ei,,,,,,:•„1.)4,,,••,,,..ci,%c.v. a. 6 ' •;•<°•95 cs',1•1 1 -r..g:iiiiiii:.iiiiiiiiiloppip'?',,,:‘,;`;',111,\:,•,,, !' •c),-;0°°' cf ',•• • •-,''.. ':•it:°•v.`er,'4,e1 2: 41 •- iiP,:i116.,01:0 ._. --..dei•Vninini. , v•'''.:'$,Cs";:•P:Is.' , %%93%Pa°. - ;‘:::iii.ii.iiinig:N.::::. •?‘•,' ..",;V)*•• ••'0' 4W :::, -- --'4' /) -,....,:••1::::::.::_......... .0.,--1.241,,,,),..,-,,•0••, is, i ri. Kiesiii.t..7!-:-..-. ---i-srs-:041.imi.,::.....:-,...q•-•'9- ‘ 4,'.' .090‘.9;°: ,,-,:;,‘;' °°046° . '°. --41, 41111110144 ;::::::::::::::::::;:.:.,,,,,:::••Z1 \ ' -.1\017' Nib, -4'1:::i::::1:::E•igg 1.. .w'..; ;',..^,i," i.'•„: ,' ,' •...,l .0000°.• .t., ,..,..0. , - c•:,,,...v...c.os,:,, , _______7A, a.:11111 00 ,0000. , 'd e• • ., . , 4.1,., ,., -_7-_--_-*'t, AI KI , • ..*::..:::;:i.M.:!. '''' . . ' ' -7.7:---:- 1 I,''.t NO•0 0_00• 1 ',4 .0_0_0_02 \ .'0,c',.=',.;4?('..,,t• '',•,21.)d%, '.•.4,.'I'', ., , .. .. ..,..e.eI al*rt• ...,Y.I.l..:+....e,..q.t_al. _ M.' ' .• VS::, '' -71----- 5'..7.) ••• c't .., -•------t':"...:c 0• ,•:::::. ' ' -------I •=‘1 Eir I .0°00% '.::,:if:::::.::::.. _..! , 0 .,:.:•:•:•:•:•:-.' s' :'.i . • t------ilc-`,...; $ :OCT. `Igi,.::.::.:.:::*i:::.'•Vr , LANJI USE ELEME1\IT ---_-_-_ i •,:: ,,,. :.------_1" •"4:..* ---- •,••,:c.• s e, ------- 5'cr..' r • ,s . ,‘• Ilatek,.-:?-..; .0000 0.-- • •:•:•:•:-0, • .•:•:•:•:00 • , Single Family g I I Commercial _-_-_-_-_ \.•,,,...,...: ,0o0o0o0o 0.0.• Tril:.4, :••..:.:.o, 'I I o ..:13/ ,4 •o 1 :, . o a L. •o. 15..oc'ci ; :..:: i.: : :: Low Density Office / Office Park ------------. :-, 'I? ••• .:::::::::::: ::::: • ...................• Multi-Family .‘. . -_-_-_-, -_-• :•;,.•• .,2., , 3 . Ok. I et, Medium Density .........• .0000000..00., .0000.000.0. Public/Quasi-Public • e_i? „ .....................................,,, ,........ 4, _ • . . ,..• 'i V.; INSI.HE High Density ....... .• _ ••,.. •,...:::::.,,,,....::,::, ,..... ... Light !Industrial - .,„:„.:::,:••:•:•:::•::::.:. Multi-Family ....•..• •- • . ;•..),„.::::.:•:::..,::::•:::„::: , •„ •,..„:.,::::::;:,,„:,:•,,,,, 7..7//:-..7-- "7/:•. -';1.'; A D ' -_-_-_-__' ---- .•:.s:.:, . , I, 4: fr. 0, ; .:------- ---- '"' A.... .::::::::::::.:i:i:i0:::•'• ' • '''t Recreation ,°0°,0%, Heavy industrial •. ,,• • ' i0 0 0 ..---__-7- ::---.4.! ,f,,, "Pow. ...i]-;u::::.::::::xf:::::5 . ..,.. , ., -------- ..It,,••...,,,•.,lii ::::::.:::. :! , -------Tit lili 'Lt.,''''''''''- • , • :::::::.:,::::=K:K:i:i: ,_ L, ---,d111,Mir -leo 00-o 0 0-,t,..; .,.., • ...0. .'010, - ...7),....: i 4:(8',,,.... . • Manufacturing Park' -- . a aim is, .0 0°0°0°0°0°0°0°0'J ,,:.-•c• - ' pt,--;-,;:, s.:A-k.„• :; Greenbelt ! 1 ,....4,•00000000•4• ••,•. ,-... ...000.002 ...,,,. r,....., .....::: 1 !.foe . ... me, •00000000000:• .....::ty,. , ...• " • / Multiple Option. ,•%,r, ..0.00°.°0°0••$ ......r...L .0.0.00 , ...„,c,..,•.' „,,,,,1 .,.,"''''' . a•• •00 oo oo oo oo oo o,.. '... c 'oco°0°0°0°.:.*.,'„*.Yr:..Y •.:::* '-' .-- .7 .' i 11vised April 1985 ... , .••• .:•00.0 .....:,it.k ...k. V.o.'...?*..e.r' '4.••A i . -- - . . • • , . . • . . . , . ' . ' . • . . ‘r.e.00GOOMEC.26P=acca... . . . \ ....... , • ,o/ t•-17--/ k,‘",... ......1 -....,..„ / , \ //,/, A As , ti , .0 /• , ; 4 •*, ....., ;$'V 4 . i , i,,,,"° /17 ,I1 . , .; 1 ii'ti‘‘ V • ; X. / 1,4' ,..\ ,k ra 1 \ ,6.• r--t .----° t" 1 i ; tr.--,0 .,....,, -; •tt,.....1 1,\k 1 k' ; VI:,e's, ;',, ,,/, .....' I, ii• , r;\ , , l'i',...,,t, •,.., t* , ,II''';. k 1 ' . . i 1 k • ) 1:',,..10 , .1. ',"4• i't.. 'k . , ,-, .,..„,..•,, ,,,,x,,, ,, .,, . ,. , I '•I • / / 4 0 4) 7V/\.' ' •; .. ' ' 1, • .,',/.-•.•'•• ! • / ,,•// oki5,411 r/ 1/ - 'il / /,,-,' ,?,,,,%'• -7/ '/ 1 , r". - rj ;i Ar -,/ $`2,i,' °. ,''./.,, v, • "a, •i' - 0,4 ../.,.4..;-,,, . ; , „:„. .•-t„,!• , ,t....- • 11 / 0 / ,;.,::. p, .., , ' ,,,--'' ,,. .•,,-t-:. 'v. ;:- ,t:?, ze a, 10,/,.4,,,,,./z,,...;7*.1/4,..0 , \ ,,,. . ,, /, ' . . .`''''44 /;*:*:'ie'-''. ''::irl‘, •,,,;>,y>. ‘.\ -\>'. .' \'/••;...-:/ % I 'I I::' • . , ,•",, -, w.i. ,,,, . ' , -/ I iki•: • sl, ,f;-„,.7fr 0,07 ' \ \"' ''' . ' • i ..7 V 11 (11;• / AA %-• • " , ,..." ,;.., . ••••., • • gi, • .",..,/„ 4 f: , . tb, \------- \,' ,,',.'.:2`":\.., ., •. i .t. ,4" , s • . ,i,l, if 's., z , \...7 ,, ,,,,, ° ,,,,,\,,• ..,,•.c' ..c,,, i..,,,,,,;. , r : \k'-,si,,,., /,.... .evH\i,//z-...//74//1/41 "...0 /t.. \ ' \\\E-k. • .. i \ till 11 • ' \'../..`\\ ..'N't." .t. . :\'''', ,f,". , ',24;M.,'•.' ')N. $\,.\ ,•\. v",. \• - . , • , ..,--......, .; •\ 2,:k • .41 , ,,, ., k. . \;"- x\ki.X\ \V"• ', ,./'`I',.••• , , - crill „\\ 'X',.,,.\:, ' . ,N,rso - ..• . ••••••••• • • \\\ .., .,,, 4,,,,- ca ,, >kr:. Ill tien'te s,I V \ \ 1..,,, , , • .\\ , „ ,,s_ .,.., .44-... ,„....... .i.‘,.,....,,,, \ Ns, s , e''. ./,',` \<•<ef:•, f, ft.1.-. , ,e„./.,,0 ,"/,,,,,,?.. ' • •••••• v.., '*..A.: *.,. •—.s ;I •\`' .', / )4,• '‘‘.,„ '.x. / sxs 1., n...•° ..; ‘...,/• ' i:15 '‘‘, \ kl:\' • . •. ,,.' Al•.7', .. '0,.• •'',/..• \' 4.4€ it.:•, \ i•,.• •,..1›......0y4`, •••' V,' •.,1 ,,,...,, ,.., .. •s•,..,0 s 0.• :• •'• I \ ...• • ,,,,..• ,, , .,,,.. •• .z.•• . s, •,\,,, • s;,,\, ,,,,,•...„ \ itioes•,\k,-1,„i., . p ..•('''l q 1;la g 1i tk b.. --, \i \(0,,,,, - 4 '1 ' ''i 4.11. ',V ii`f •iii et <., \.4 \‘',lc'',/ trt 4 lq-li ,.. lij.14,>izfii.zgi'f.,. .;?1 "I',.,„ •.., Av.,\,,,,. , \k„:,,,\'.,\ ,, ,.<••..;',/ • ‘,.,k..;\kk '. e, .,i it •-10,-.. )ri, D n fl i xs r.,.. ci ,o t i i '1•(: 2 ‘tt.. r,,,,5'• kk[i: . .4. ,iik -,1,-,F,-, =!. .f.:?if., . 'H . ., \ . N.,.„ 1,,*5, n' ik a ', : ' 4, l'N' :t .,,,. i5 •,. • 0 f , \ ..z,...\ . b ' 1 \ \ o if \ \ \ \ \ \g-e .:34 .../// z----------,.. ...\ / , ____ . _______ _ • ..________ _ . _,„..r.NO. Ei.,v A CANIPIJG NIASTISR PLAN Date:.1-.4,...,5; aovinad: Li, r' 5 i T* r?...to; • vieggilaini DAR slums PROPERTY Orowns p::it„. . WARREN LAFON IVIAPLCI VALLGY HIGHWAY Chocked: .. 'T. • • • • ill m E m _ A. H-LINE I 3--4Q5 ON;r)AMP l3 ....:ewe cr WYCMENT 1 • i Iq -2*arlanTrlTM .y. Y , MOT- IiiiILIIIIML _ _ �- la aT0 LL9 I 'I -9 6'I'DI 9T W ��6 VI) Eli LL9 0 �1• • S ri —1 •�`_i �s_/ ,(� _ erg. - °( .f /fiT IR+`+' is !\ � N Ii I _ i, )1 I , _Ij,_ - I / IIIIIIII1IIII I ! / FI I - ` li____Fil+' i 2 : a g I , ------ I- I \ I 1 I 1 1 i I I I Igl _ 1106'; -,. - �! I I r. I 0- --..�_.,...__4_—�f ��� °' 'AI ! ! I I II /I71I I"%—j a` i- I `) z I I S_ W • '° r7— _ I _ .f_- _ _ 1 I 2.5-rci-o----1 -/i-'--' IF —7 -.—„ ' lg rt, Ye 51 -i •• yQt gzc[��n •a:G 1 ;N �Sg AKA 6' (tpp `'', dDPTiU N n �I "v Fe • ' 1 • • • 1V • - IC;, . [; - . • .1 1 5fTE. PLAN 51-YEP1 CLOUD INN -Ptf?NTON Jure gVST JOHN ANDEHHSONN AND ASSOCIATEESS- PS. INC. .— JIM WEYMOI.ITH• OMIN L:I'1 A P C ll I O V E V� T S • 10620 Ni. ID • Ntl lvI NIUYyN•040I • 120114513011 N 1 1 . 1 • ' L 9 • yMM 9y i ' 1 • • • • I is 3 .. 1 3 a \ • • • - per.IN NAcrNG'WILD GRASS lik1—a. •aC,Y r14,Cy: i .. i • , 8/ Z 2 woovE1'i N i /HJ 9 �,' /j://,'/ r ;/��/„(y�1 • 11 , 3 -; 't- .// t , ----------______-Y• i/ H or' N Os / 0 6 1, 2, 4 P . Al k §g (-41-1 P i: oitp .i. 1 14/ ,_„ a , J _ ....., Asficie:drWIrTF�il� riiY.� iy..ui:�l q : rTraw o E C) /L11 13 I `f� Y N T g • • 1 a j 5' 1 ; • 0 0 0 u ,. ,,I i LAND30.1t.. PL4'N ,DILVC-hCLDUD INN- heNTON ° ,5.a-, JOHN ANOERSON ANO ASSOCIATES PS, INC. JIM WGYMOUTH-CWNU'f IitO NL YA • w„,...tpYpMe IMO • Rom!4514171 y T I 9qq 4 1 • 5 1 3 's 2 a H I I I I `s 1 1. JI I ---41\ , 1mi, 1 1 / . , 1 ' 1 I ll ] E] 4.—.-7 R ,__ _ g g , 3 ,...._. H "_.... . _ , , . .., D.,,, _ 1 • . ___., , ___ , _..., , _, . r - 1 J ] - ] 1 . _______ EH ," ,' _. 7 1_, , c; U�, li, - , ,=.... / H1 ., ., 0 ./. 7 ii _ _ Inini --1 I/ • :i fir, ' , ... ', Of. IfF., !01' Q SOUTH AWC T eLE.YATIGNS �ILYE.h CLOUD INN-hENTON °"T� JONN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS. INC. � Q! -J .LN WGYMOiITM-OHNGfi DJUNCATE e'07 < �' -11 � 0 A° RCH117CC7' S lane u.110 • rs.n.Ilabligio 10a01 • aow EMMA •i • !,.-:, . • ti I i i . , . • , . . 0 S . .1 I 1 A . • . . .- • .. . .11 1 1 • 1 1111111 IOW IV II 11 IT \ '— L_. p-------___; , ill . \ . — • • `. 1, i 1 U • • .rn II I li A . . [._.'''!'• „•••.;- ,,,a.r --43=7--- - RP 0,F ,--] It .I-II ja • !-):. 4 iimi Tjl m 6 ' L . 0 6 , 7 = — • 1 , -.:•. ./- B —1 • - 1 1 1 — Ea • ,1 i„ ,, lli —li _ — illii ! lilt k_ 1 . 111'TM, . - ill II • . . , .__ _ _ • ,.,,,,,,, - „„ -„„,„,• -1- . . , • • n.1..1 .1i1I . . . • 1-1-11—[ I . I' MI 1E1 1 I111 ., r-- rig • 1 • Pi Cliq . , — . MU Pr Rua . . - • 1:1. 4 la(.r ,... ff.,Iff[j jai No II. . Nil in. • I I ., u . mu , . 1._______r____ • 11111111111111J111111111M1111 f,, • 7 i mit ... I ral 114 : = . i _ 1 1 ,..........-4 y ME iiiiiiiiiiiliniiiiiiiit . - " • I . I . . 1 1 * tift 01, 4 T 1 • • . . . _ . . . ,..., fr.". C 1 . F. I;: li A Hr.' , -." I, ,...., . .,--l. g N171,Ar0 -1 q 10.11!ST ri-PYATIO\15 8111Neth CLOUD INN- FtNTON t3tT•4 'Esr JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS. INC. JIM V/LYMOUTH• OWNV -N I 1'9 * ARC .C=OOVECGT' S. ., , 1029 11.I.211 • 0.11rns Italhetla M1001 • 12991 0422111 — , . . . . . . AMENDED OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ,gip . WESTPAES COMES FILING 3 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT • - s • ' IN TEE CITY OF WESTMINSTER R` O s COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF Camino _ . _ 3 ofl 4 CO JI H II —ntn--- '1 �i ilk , li 0, _ - (�' - u.nos • SIDE ELEVATION • . • I/4"•1'-0" • k. an a� n� - _a 1. cam,-..,. •. . ; — kr 0. • L W • u � "'=`� - -_ ICI f__rM: " .... : _. W W� [[% W[L. �1.e'p11y�Kn�Y'V! � rt.. bL � • ® SERVICE ELEVATION . a .ENTRY 74• 4�,a .;.__iie.$_ '-•-. N+N Wee `won io°uL to,T a'�ca . - :�w r...,. 1 e..J. . 6Iy I 1;11 o, s -- ------- - - ---- L----------- --------O.1.- ----- — -' : � - ''''LL 1M • - Nuuo ly._ .- 2.-_ :"y.� e)_`N+✓.�'•i. s 1-- _ i -H-__ ' IJ00 N° 6 11 /w .: V I 6 PCIT:17 vY✓ I ♦O� I- d •' ` �" ... .... .. ., ..._ • ..n.unn od. Rat. R 4 • I-Lt OTOP or cone m.o. } -..--. ----- --- ws. ,sureco2o op.,' °aw.7 w..auNv a..17 • ENTRY ELEVATION : .EXTERIOR /4.•1'-0. CO.rv. ..°..r lame! e�Evenol s.n N.. MOW T. RM.BOO. ..1......ttm...TO.acal M.r.u.... A7 a, I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIS-MN: IIAPPR0VED wriROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED • s<24w, rvz- • ND � K Gam, c/b$-9i PC Atio�! (UUI���sei . .J -t (3i ( 5iy�,J Pec, k `- S� /11104 X--, r DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 11 / &GLELZ-61-1(14L1A,t— ® APPROVED DAPpROVED WITH CvDITIONS ):110T APPROVED )0.4,4Arz)*.A.Am...EIT- v-Za-- CITY OF RE! TON REGEVEDJUL 28 1987 BUILDING 1 ZONING DEPT. ri - l i ,,'/ ` , sir DATE S d SIGVATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUT 0`.IZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 . Form 182 ?EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f _ Pre\J-Pr;-i - El APPROVED .r APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED F. ate, .4e W . 1.,te-na...--",uo4e-d - dd .3p 24J /4/0-46, o u.L c7ix� /S`O • ar����� tea+ ...� ...�•w „C.tft�u-;- ,ADD . DATE: 4/ /7, /7g 7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / • REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV?eTON: `G,i ' 0 APPROVED D APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,'NOT APPROVED 1' —leascot Lik.(.. .cS` -ou-cs. (."-.►(A- etkcdsC?i�'e 5 N,iLccti t w c-'r W 6. e to-Q It \NO l" V o O k.0 C CA SO NA4 eCc 0 T C @oSS ild4.3 rt_V.4 . , 2. . 1tte irn 1% I NI slit'1'C l Ci(i,Lt.*. 01)Vthe c0►f' U¢:�t 19.1 S 0 u.. (.-1 DOUL z& 0 to I\A.\' g r v‘► &) l pro l 1as ea `Ca.c Q L11-ti . ."-`64S UVo� Ctrs c� zzcor.C2 e scIloL5 \''a.ci . tLt ,U-- � � 6 -((.47 f 0_,,a_c___ DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE - ---- estrozwa— REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : , 7?2�/ c- Z--1-7,-'F'-,-,<-1-- 0 APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS T APPROVED I I �1 lb _Lb hk„,Z"a,p do a'. S ,,of 5L,„,c-4' l4s �a? C.E'S_j --Y„_cr ( L7 s 6,-) F3 L-Ca , j ---)Y" D P D S v:_ P -i-k.l' t_ L 3-( L...4. 4+--eCL l d-1 4 1-4 `tom 1 7-/, ' C. a-� S S --a-YJ --- 2 'e J-1J 17 -; • , / bzr�/J �O�/ Y/ �' h J� !.[�,•�� .eit-t G' e2-rL� i,J d.z.e 7''`'r Q ' ,f -o- f' , .71.7,-L.,,p-...-._, c...-i-----Az I-J -9,si,s .,f..-)1,,ed. k.rz jj--)--DA,,i;czie' _ o I. . .e.-4-° v e- S l.,„,..s ei, .a-J 'e.,- c e...-_k e i,4 //, a-, .. '.P g ratJ P E - 40 5 Ft 2-'^- ry a. -F le- S 1-.3 i , /2Z,___ -.„ 5 `%__,,,, ' ' DATE: 5?t-j: 'n, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR THORIZED REPRESENTATI E,$ bud/r Est , C S f uP 9 sac- e. 5 j —Y 7 Pr'‘')/ '`�' 2 9 a/a 1 ,e)e/a5�/ :49 !moo/ , /x � REVISION 5/dorm 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 07/b/7'>/ A/6/MEE/ZINO El APPROVED Ej APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS // NOT APPROVED WATER PGADV Re4'v/.eeL T s>w&?' ,Sy Fi Peo7 7i MAJDA DS sue'' MUTT APPROVAL SUBJECT TOJ . WI -+i ,°: °+REEMEVT-WATEER j, O yL..W. G'i Ably) LATE CO AGREEMENT-SEWER /1/o ¢!®rye . �� � SYSTEM AMIEt@P EMIT CHARM-WATER Es r W/7,, °°_AID v,V,T X ✓/S= '°2 /2 ®ao SYSTEM IEUT CHARGE-SEWER n >/.ES /IS.°' -. Uw/T x //,S"= ZB / o • o„ SPECIAL ARMEN AREA CHARGE-WAVER ; ND 08 �� 2 '�D SPECIAL. BU AREA CHARGE-SEWER NO Ft," B''' `GI, APPROVED WATER PLAN AXACT. ;VA :,e id W 4 l3Z rev ��' .4. . • ''o IJ. Cam$ APPROVE®SEWER PLAN�SSG) NM)LA Or 4. C4� /366 Bf �d��;.-' - 2�J' r' Less �® APPROVE®FIRE MUM LOCATIOPS - e 2ds'�P •.v.s6i,2_m�' , �j BY FIRE DEPT. Mgr� Flu.FEW M.�A`L IS (-,- CO.,0).4A--- DATE: '7/ IA /87 SIGNATURE OF D. nECTOR OR Arrt; ... ZED REPRESENTATIVE 714 1_ Z6, ,= ./ . e iSQ. ,T• .- REV$S ON 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVT°7,ON: T5L l) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED • CD OFF- s i?'e /AtAg 0-2 C.)! 6,1 C2 e'V/.S o.J ca; 0 B C. {D C S d'77 C(ST rJT..JL S • • DATE: 7 1-i2? SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Z0I311'lX0 APPROVED 1:474APPROVED WITH CONDI]1IONS Ei NOT APPROVED 1Y1 oK)-1' LDIvw\olo c., o`� ApIN j( NRzGH -( c-NKAL THROucchou i '(Hr DEC. CA)mix-ES O eX C `» `'i - -1 tz,16 t-4l C Lo P,'r 15 l"D F U L,t;( cts\t\cisc:IpsiDgo l RR ►GATE.O w ITI-} `1 F�. PCs-1 CF TI-fe, 3i761D 5-TEE3) H I Ll,3I JXc, —ro 5 1001 -rQ f�� (]1�7u(�(' �1� 1 r I S rG 471I\& j Faz L()51,1z1\.) Mor �C� (-ovc=R A 64_,4, 61:)eRa( jZ. 0)Eiti ( )6 DOivi T.1 r�� 4 L c pad �1►v��,IZ.�l7 OVC--(Z . DATE: • SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Uei-AIGu\_,ps '- GIRO UL fr Q11) drAPRowo onJ 'rife �116 r R, cu c >c PN KIiU(o "(c) L(Z.ENT , WJ I %.(U LN DSc1 3 I5Lf\NCJ5 516 Auld Iact_C 2EG‘I) t,):5AP Jt) ) 514, S7?.ls Nz-E PRouicCp (. l IzC,UL-iFTl O1\) I N) L 0-1 - A5-t C 1-101&L Pik)f) k)o k,T s-j Gr Ga+v fyy \ DUcir) Nu ozR_, A h'1iNtIyylukry, Eo/ wl06 LN,N)f).5c Ste,N\d< I� TC� 1'' 1'C u I i) I) nzar v\ .T.1+6 PROPPO2•rf Nb3pcc_EN"( Pill_, l-d61-101\; IRIS tu-&fi TO (Y; CoPR cid) '3`r URolu soly 4q He 4 2- 405 Nr3uLtilto SI B 0 II 1 `` ' ,,� `�— ' \`r tea. \� / • ,_.:-..... ,% -,1-..S -‘ \ 40 )IYX z • • . •._ eN- \ ty- vt, ..., , . _ , ,.. , ,.. .---. 1.. ,may . .; I \ . • i ‘ /I /-7". TA6-r- c: I )110., l ,/' tr. /I / , ( v //_ . J LJ 0l _ I. 1 , i ilp . N * --'• A . . . _ \ ., :,../ . -III I ) s•.,• ri-.:1 1 1 ., .. ./ 1 . il //: \ ‘1 _. i • •\ sip - •... .‘. . :,•17.\\: '. : /4?‘ ,,, w-, ". ' .,;.(1 . . 1 // \ •4, • 4 ' lt,- • c • • ...7- /,' iI P ' . • il / ' 110- Icy,, 4/1_,,, ft. 14:•••:. ‘.• 4 \ :I: . ' ' 1 ) / v/r)c, . - Ir .,. 1 1 i dm .- ,4' V: I 4 ,,P ., -. / ./. „,, - . 4* . .1.4._,. .= ,.. . A.- ▪ 1• • P; - • ` . - i...vi. • . . 4.. , / , �� 7; , •. , �Ir.l ..< ., .._oi / • /�/ ,� o l'?�11 ��+� I i / -_ t'l ii• . Plgtqfrar - N le �' ov • / s N / / . ' . Al . i i fit (NI X,, 1-1 l% M .. . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVrcJON : f ' 'Cr ' rCet- +t/ <o'n_ '11 APPROVED MA1'PROVED WITH CONDITIONS SNOT APPROVED • t • ?rev( de <-A-- `�"u-c ( C'�-t!e- l�vl Vic& a<'i a C- e ed 7� Ity h0,. / 447 D e,, d,r, Sltroky p c (tee Cek.cw-- R.i'vet/- • e eSed Q'��.. E�v i✓-u+.,.wti. �d.G �wG� GV 1�p G e VOA,e I c v- o�.�- v�1 - s i- e. L. ,4 rc ply � JG s'iy a,4,1 at- 10 e tat !!dare X (id • /he e4 6 y(zoi;-- DATE: 0/4 —3, / P 12 SIGMA/ OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I� h x,p r I 0 6..?Si/e ®•47t er 5e'de wg- 1l?/1Evl$IO 5/1982 Form 182 h 4,e(4.- the dc-e 49f 90-01 .,,Itrdf -4-//p/-eve, or- !o TG re 4e, e. d4r l de,Ce--ael g hOlil- • • • • • • *Wed& '1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-054-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and 40, 000 sq. ft. office building on a 5. 696 acre site. PROPONENT: RaMac,Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the. environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , November 9, 1987,in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. C Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 DATE OF DECISION: October 21, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: October 26, 1987 TI517/462 nald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer uilding and Zoning Director Policy Development Director (447-44M1-6 Ri rd C. Houghton Pub is Works Director �- 4 1004 ilo" DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: RaMac, Park Place ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-049-87 - APPLICATION NO. : SA-055-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. restaurant and a 40, 000 sq. ft. office building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 on-ramp traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6, 300. 00 for the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the ramp. 2 . That the applicant shall be responsible for designing a new traffic signal and having it installed at the existing entrance to Park Place. It will be the applicant's responsibility to see that the new traffic signal is coordinated with the on-ramp traffic signal to I-405. The signal design shall meet the City of Renton' s existing equipment. 3 . That the applicant provide a crosswalk across the Maple Valley highway at the traffic signal. 4 . That the applicant be responsible for the off-site improvements on the north side of Maple Valley Highway along the project site frontage on Maple Valley Highway. 5. That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 6. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to- provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 7. That hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 8. That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. 9. That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the site. • Atiht4VAb /a 1 Determination of Non- mificance Mitigation Measures 016 RaMac, Park Place Page 2 10. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant) from upland properties, the applicant shall provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing canopy trees around the parking areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building and Zoning's Department. 11. That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. 1 �ti 's<i��'fi- -' ). �p^ rti' il i s _�. r, l'rc r-i y•_`.w•f;_�4� '1r,l 4:'sJa'', — ti3-•.i•C �Mi;4t Y;'=, ^r':I i� y1r' _ I,Iy 3�� , .. 4 ' • t , '� ' � ' ; , • 1' im " 'firfY`f° r }} '' < ' i i:' . <i'r:� ' . . ;' : •„,,`'i;'0 � ,• 'i. OF.iia�+ R� ,,r :u4.,i:.,} " gt, 'a�I, ir,)..ti:,:k,s..•y7�,.. ,rr.^,t• •,,:r:,„<'r v..:,1 'Y, ,- ,¢ ., ,a, ' •' � ,r. �iw, •. ,.�,y, .',. , . . .. , F , ;. .r .r i. ., , . . r . ,^. ! . . ,,,,, ,...,4'. I; -.}",fir~ fi�0 © „0 } r' ` - • ,+tom','(: Z I".Y"� ' ITICE . . ' ' 7'EC SEPSE , • Examiner City of Renton Land Use ea.rin g will hold a . ' I ' . . .? '..'r ' '' e` Utz. _ is Y, fr , fi • rt ' i I� , • •CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , 'CITY HALL ON .DECEMBER .8, 1987 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. . P.M. • CONCERNING: RAPIAC, INC. ECF-049-87, SA-054-87 ' r 1,40¢ • APPLICATION FOR SI TE ITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A4& ROOM HOTEL, . A 3,900- SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT & .40,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON;.•A , ' 5.696 ACRE SITE. . ' • ' • • ' , ' • • • • • • GENERAL .':,LOCATION AMID/DR ADDRESS: . . 1800: MAPLE- VALLEY HIGHWAY, ' ,IMMEDIATELY EAST OF• I—'405 . . ''' .:''' , . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL .THE CITY OF RENTON '' -'' BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550' . - ; •T IIS NOTICE; YNOT' .TO BE REMOVED :WITHOUT ''''' �' r ' L=-- ',.'P 1PER A_ U_ THO RIZATION • - ' ei, .,•,l Si..,, .a�-i:::tk, ,-•.Y,., ."-/.._,xya YY «a'_ .. .r_„ .+:�_ _ .'-h-. ' it—IIG'w 1 • NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION THA E REN ONEHEAR NGI EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND Alison Supanich ,being first duly sworn on oath states FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASH- INGTON, ON DECEMBER 8, 1987, at 9:00 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the A.M. to CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: HENDERSON HOMES VALLEY DAILY NEWS As of prop to rezone approximately 2.8 • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition located at r4922 ertand 5020from 1 N.E. 20th Property File Nos.:ECF-069-87,R-077-87. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers HENDERSON HOMES INC., DIVISIONS 3,4,5,AND 6 are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Application to rezone approximately months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published 25.33 acres from G-1 to R-1 and application for preliminary plat approval to subdivide in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King said property into 172 single family lots, County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal and two variances to allow use of a private newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for alley to serve three lots and a pipe stem to by p g serve one lot. Property located north of King County. N.E. Sunset Blvd. and east of 142nd Ave- nue S.E. if extended. File Nos. ECF-067- 37, R-074-86, V-075-86, V-076-86, PP-077- The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition 36. , (and not in RAMAC,INC. Renton Edition ___ —, Auburn Edition Application for site plan approval for the supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 during the below stated period.The annexed notice a sq. ft. restaurant and 40,000 sq. ft. office building on a 5.696 acre site. Property Per-to? Sparing Rmam s"►Ar located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of 1-405. File Nos. ECF- was published on _ 27 1 gg !049-67,SA-054 87. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERES:net ED PERSONS TO SAID The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON sum of $ 35. 20 EXPRESS R 8, 1987, AT :00 A.M. TO Published in the Valley Daily News Nov. ai�� 27, 1987.R2645.'F Subscribed and sworn to before me this end day of_Dec 19.82 • ( gam . _ Notaryblic for the State of Washington, 'i .• = 4 N t C' • residing at Federal Way, g - fl ' 1 17 i ) King County, Washington. VON#87 Revised>>86 ` I I • .; 1.. _.V `.! Z3Nl1\i'G DEPT. / ( llo a) HE/Dskl PH112787 NOTICE' OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON DECEMBER 8, 1987, at 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: HENDERSON HOMES Application to rezone approximately 2 .8 acres of property from G-1 to R-1. Property located at 4922 and 5020 N.E. 20th Place. File Nos. : ECF-069-87, R-077-87. HENDERSON HOMES INC. , DIVISIONS 3 , 4, 5, AND 6 Application to rezone approximately 25. 33 acres from G-1 to R-1 and application for preliminary plat approval to subdivide said property into 172 single family lots, and •two variances to allow use of a private alley to serve three lots and a pipe stem to serve one lot. Property located north of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and east of 142nd Avenue S.E. if extended. File Nos. : ECF-067-87, R-074- 86, V-075-86, V-076-86, PP-077-86. VRAMAC, INC. `Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. restaurant and 40,000 sq. ft. office building on a 5. 696 acre site. Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. File Nos. ECF-049-87, SA-054-87. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 8, 1987, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS PUBLISHED: November 27, 1987 • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NUIIUt Ur tNVtHUNMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Audrey termer ,being first duly sworn on oath states COMMITTEE N that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the RENTON, talW Review Committee Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Revised Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE — MITIGATED for VALLEY DAILY NEWS the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Appli- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition cant(s) have completed a mitigation pro- cess pursuant to WAC 197-11-502(c). Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers AA ApplicationAC INC. r site PLACE) for site plan approval to con- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six struct a 115 room hotel,a 3,900 square foot months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published restaurant (Phase 1) and a 40,000 square foot office building (Phase II). Property in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway. File County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Nos.:ECF-049-87,SA-054-87. newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Further i regarding this octio is availablenfo in mation nin g the Building and Zog King County. Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Hearing Examiner by November 9, 1987. , Renton Edition Y. , Auburn Edition , (and not in Published in the Valley Daily News Oct. 26,1987.R2589. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Public Notice • was published on October 26, 1987 R2589 • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 19.20 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3rd day of Novert:ber19 8 7 No y Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 F . AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Public Notice Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE VALLEY DAILY NEWS RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the follow- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers f1g project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six have completed a mitigation process pursu- antmonths prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published to WAN 197-11-350. RAMAC, INC. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Application for site plan approval for the County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for bu ft. restaurantoa5 96nd 40,000r e. ft. perry by p g building on a 5.696 acre site. Property King County. located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of 1-405. File Nos. ECF- 049-87,SA-054-87. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in Department, Municipal Building, Renton, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC during the below stated period.The annexed notice a action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by November 30, 1987. Notice of rnvironrnental Determination Published in the Valley Daily News Nov. 16, 1987. R2612. was published on o-)vernber 16, 19(37 •. 2612 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ L ?.c 0 Subscribed and sworn to before mw this day of Novemher19 87 Notar blic for the State of Washington, 'rni v �. r:': ;� �` / !mil residing at Federal Way, ' i King County, Washington. 11 •! VDN#87 Revised 11/86 I �'�, �� HE/dskl RAMAC NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON DECEMBER 8,. 1987, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION(S) : RAMAC, INC. Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. restaurant and 40, 000 sq. ft. office building on a 5.696 acre site. Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. File Nos. ECF-049-87, SA-054-87. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 8, 1987, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO' EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: November 27, 1987 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JERRY F. LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in f? a , on M day oof V�/��%,e� ACQ�ale/boC SIGNED: \ie JUL ( Art-;C;• . 5 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Pc,t(CP J DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, ig117 COMMENTS DUE: July 31. 1987 EFC - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shang)._ PROJECT TITLE: Park Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project consists of a 115 room hotel , a 3,906 sq. ft. resturant and and 40,000 sq.ft. of office space. LOCATION: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediatelt east of I-405 SITE AREA: 5.696 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 248,117.76 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air d 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: p /4u/ el•r•-#. /74d G(12e, �2� d v 7/7 R OF RENTON AU G 101987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 2 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP, 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane) PROJECT TITLE : PARK PLACE • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROJECT CONSISTS OF A 115 ROOM HOTEL. A"3.900 SO. FT. RESTTTRANT AND AN 40.nnn scie FT_ OF OFFICE SPACE. LOCATION : 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, IMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-405 TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ____ Ej ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION ASCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS .& RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT an,' OF RENTON a POLICE DEPARTMENT R Cy C E p V E OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AU G 1987 0 D 1 OTHERS : BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. COMMENTS OR _SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE . COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ,,\ BY 5:00 P.M. ON DULY 31. 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,'NOT APPROVED -lettfro OS¢G� TeL � C t64-aoU' e,(i It (��� P l.tC✓Q/� e S �,{ 1i ICCt�I� pr c o� ' r�.& L % 4 P Cci-v' o k. E crc. c V'o ?lCt>v �o pkto o C e e1/4 so ` "`OCQ 0 C. C.co 'IA3ku VA . . Z . sre 1 S 1 roc 5 lac i C�e.��l` ' %A-0 tri e co kr l9 eludgs g 0 wc \,(JOU,L3412 p rJ 1\l.\ 4 r Its► ci lto pro oS a--- DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 1 !')/V 9 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Yh -ci DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, i 87 COMMENTS DUE: July 31, 1987 EFC - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shan PROJECT TITLE: Park Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project consists of a 115 room hotel , a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and and 40,000 sq.ft. of office space. LOCATION: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediatelt east of-I-405 SITE AREA: 5.696 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 248,117.76 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air cf 3) Water 4) Plants v-- 5) Animals ITY OF RENTO 6) Energy and Natural Resources ��- R 0{ L' 7) Environmental Health S 1987 8) Land and Shoreline Use 4---- 9) Housing v BULLUIN3 ZONiNG DEPT, 10) Aesthetics t/ 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation �✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities L� COMMENTS: 11 AOC i ctO '� S /) /2L9 41) c CG e..s s O - 57 P p G4 o a �--�-�'/-E.%�. • �-,� is�.� �-/'�; �iJ a 7C'h �r�2J � tlLie o a 30 ---D¢ s lea y Sc�. a C©s5'71- t`o tam t� �; a-*�.L�; 7a �� c�� ah7‘,- f 71;-a /c r �p� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identifiedareas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 204-3,6)) Signature of Director or/Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT t DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane) PROJECT TITLE: PARK PLACE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROD T ON zsT of A 115 ROOM HOTET.. A 3, RESTIIRANT ANT) AN 40_._0Il0 SD FT. OF OFFICE SPACE. LOCATION : 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, IMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-405 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION ITRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS .& RECREATION DEPARTMENT ary ;r, , TOM E E 9 V LI BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT E J El POLICE DEPARTMENT AUG 3 1987 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BULDIN /Z��IN ��° OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE . COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON DULY 31. 1987 /i1? REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION::?— ic_ APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS SOT APPROVED l b -Lb S s 1.c c, Co-�,.� Lax `�Y a�a ��� � ►�� [ ` a� `S �1 /n 4� - Y/ , ;A// Pam` e 1Ji o rS �' � , �R P G A 1.-a—ems-. �. ;l-p a c_' tee' "2 s l s .L - P • A oe �'7'�`)_;i bve-r S ✓ `Q ZJ one- c .`C e ��- , J �o�� fa I� gTdr P — yc9 5 62.aL-._...�? `�'Ya �' �l� icy l . DATE: F ?� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR ORvrRIZED REPRESENTATIVE cP .� 6 a/, �p 0, REVISION 5/1982 / �/� /i For�A 182 24--- v 21A9N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U-I-i I rhr-c DATE CIRCULATED: Jim 17, J987 COMMENTS DUE: July 31, 1987 EFC - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane PROJECT TITLE: Park Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project consists of a 115 room hotel , a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and and 40,000 sq.ft. of office space. LOCATION: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediatelt east of I-405 SITE AREA: 5.696 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 248,117.76 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water , 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RED ,lU La3 ` 1g87 BUILDING ! 4,10... ft 0 v_ .>0,,,o,,,,,,, We have re le' ed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expe tis:. i• ,nd have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition- in o ill .• is needed to properly assess this proposal. 14 7 a9 //7 , Signatu 'e of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA VENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-054-87 PROPONENT : RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane) PROJECT TITLE : PARK PLACE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROJECT CONSISTS OF A 115 ROOM HOTEL. A 3.900 SO. FT. RESTURANT AND AN 4n.nn0 Se.. FT._ OF OFFICE SPACE. LOCATION : 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, IMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-405 TO : cwin,o= % V w: n ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN , u SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ❑ ENGINEERING DIVISION Vt. 3 01987 n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISI ocn1 ,- 0 �' SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : MI UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU C'`/4'eC°' -5 g0, ' 6'49. Pr. 4A-&-As GJ/GL 8E A2vercrEn ofroni ,mac 'P7 n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® ADDITIONINFOREQUIRED üBUILDG & ZONING DEPARTMENT ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Aw-oew.eeiSeetR,� I. E 'SQUARE FOOTAGE - 2)P �le ` n POLICE DEPARTMENT CITDE 2. C9O ' TH ERRSS 1/ErP/F/Gll7'lOnl or KECD.eDvn4 ❑ POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT or sHoeT PGAT. ® OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P ,M, ON JULY 31, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : C/1/4/7y 4 I //VIE'1/AU 1 ❑ APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS JJ NOT APPROVED WATER P44/v de6ePoilzeD »/14 I UTIUTV APPROVAL SUBJECT TOJ ,s',Phew �Li r, AJL),9ibS ser LATE AGREEMENT-WATER A/D 1 / L' , 65 Arty LATE CLS AGREEMENT-SEWER A/D ` �BT6G ' SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER yiES ge/7,r:V.-Z asp7 X /AS= 2a/2g s SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER }/,ES of/j�:°4 i. i,r x //,$"= s$ 20/ 0 0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER N ) 4, 2�' p SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER ``S �rev �� APPROVED WATER PUN 000.57% `VATS° AJ W t73Z ,,� rev ;✓�'(D, 24d• °o rROYED SEWER PLAN 9 ,S ) PG�A1•NOT'r'1-CGE, /eGRO IFEDV RE HrORAT LOCATIOS DY L7RE DEPT. I ?FLC':V ARAL /�!D t � . ( 0,,d1,4---- VI - 7 DATE: l 8 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE * ,'ST/A1,47 D/v4 / , 7)TWC ,PEA= 264426Z Da CO.PTil .LEss-MDTC e54 - e 21 . D REVISION 5/1982 03 Z . 24 .ifX 'r.4¢= 44./291 g0 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ,ne:PX t ne-w DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, 4)fi7 COMMENTS DUE: July 31. 1987 EFC - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shan el PROJECT TITLE: Park Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project consists of a 115 room hotel , a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and and 40,000 sq.ft. of office space. LOCATION: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediatelt east of I-405 SITE AREA: 5.696 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 248,117.76 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth ✓ 2) Air 3) Water ✓ l f OF RQ� O 4) Plants f 5) Animals v ;1 All 3 1987 6) Energy and Natural Resources BUILDING j?MIN( DEPT. 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 1/ c 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation �✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation I ✓ 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities y ✓ COMMENTS: 11 r prZ�Q Sak l r�•aucA& 80), .goy J (A 0 .i �. PA S P . off'-sue �w . &ld , 4, Uri av s d es k' u 4 Ste.✓' 41, RcUrte..crA., C t)58 I/3 aCr 11114e(6 "141 /4 Propose Sic f ac 44-'rJh( Wel CJs4'der alit rL 411 vt-1 ,L'it We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have .identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. fl' 7/e- Y47 Signature , rector r Au horized Representative Date Form 4 / RENTC '" BUILDING & ZONING DEPAF JIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane) PROJECT TITLE : PARK PLACE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROJECT CONSISTS OF A 115 ROOM HOTEL. A" 3.900 SO. FT. RESTURANT AND AN 40.nnn FT_ OF OFFICE SPACE. LOCATION : 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY,' IMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-405 TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ELENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION Ei FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ELIPARKS .& RECREATION DEPARTMENT MI DF RENTDN ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT R D OPOLICE DEPARTMENT AUG 3 1987 El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. DoTHERs : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE . COMMENTS TO THE F'UILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M, ON JULY 31. 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �� El APPROVED Ei APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED c�.ev/ 06-=-mow, 41, o eiu p-esadO arc K,n., C PCs-3 i'1, P A0n /q 7tC. Rla ( sy,.,.1 slob/ e ► P. P nfVN DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE d REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 !r;//7 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Poet_ ( 0el e-101 DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, 1987 v COMMENTS DUE: July 31.., 1987 EFC - 049 - 87 _ E iTON APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-054-87 = JUL 1 'l 1987 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane PROJECT TITLE: Park Place romict OQF T item' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Pro;j.ect consists of a 115 room hotel , a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and and 40,000 sq.ft. of office space. LOCATION: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediatelt east of I-405 r f, SITE AREA: 5.696 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 248,117.76 sq. ft./ IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth ✓ 2) Air ✓ 3) Water ✓ CITY O F ,TON 9ICEIVED 4) Plants ✓ f 5) Animals ✓ Jul 28 987 6) Energy and Natural Resources ' ✓ 7) Environmental Health ✓ ELIDING ZO 9 NG DEPT. 8) Land and Shoreline Use ''✓ 1/ 1— r 9) Housing ✓ 10) Aesthetics ✓ ✓ 11) Light and Glare V 12) Recreation ✓ v 4- cj 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ' ✓ 14) Transportation I ✓ ✓ 44. k2 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ella-eAX-OCt,LArY) 44.4, dV1 1) AA. TAt.tit..c ,ot.tieNt4tAt..A.- ,Lo r 2) t,it.t4-- Ada.- (Ay •^ ,C.a e01/ 1 We have r viewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. eieLef(Lt-briAtItAt e A btitIde e 4 444gPir dull, lei 1°)07"! Signature of Director or Aut orized Rip sentative Dat Form 4 VW-Gal—Cc- ) iv Aucol! -,, LtA,_e_tit 3 �� Z=54'' tat -71)Levv-e,C,L4._„(., Lt-LA1+12A 4A-ZeLe--Ler t-A-ZYK— ex--4-L-0C - t_Aryln- • e44)_eit4=3:_le 104:t.A4t-.AX-A—.)_ (= It_dt.A.)-e., raitAc— a— waR.....d—rA-4- IL°° . 4-1-4%-t-e-41 txt=t)-_. C.r-h--C-era_iJ P ) 44-01-0--e-t-c-aLd&* /a•tik_IrzA.A7-40- bt-e v) 6,k.c " V ��, � 1 7�Gek � ' rt.".*...t ""bert) GeLAra=k-- . er 't • tueLott $) +.0 -cam ��t- ,� -bp c�.�„ ef-e-e4:412t-Es&A.AS—e-G4— L-t-40 • t.dr etfre..‘-G-eLe1/4.1- - � 7E� �.tL.cG�s� U x 2z RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 049 - 87 ntN?GIB APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-054-87 JUL ? 1987 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane) ' rOFVF1(1PPNF PROJECT TITLE : PARK PLACE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: P PJECT CONSISTS OF A 115 ROOM HOTEL. A 3.900 SO. FT. RESTURANT ANn AN 4n.nnn FT. OF OFFICE SPACE. LOCATION: 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY,' IMMEDIATELY EAT OF I-405, TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION 1:1 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT ®-POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 110THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE . COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 31. 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : OuAttilyirotA,A--- APPROVED El APPROVED WITH C DITIONS i OT APPROVED e):3 7 /1— it/3 CITY ik F RENTON RECEOVED JUL 28 1987 BUILDING!ZONING DEPT. 44 klIttO . 11r DATE; / 051 11P)7---SIGVATURE OF DIRECTO IZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fr �, -" \, m r, DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, "087 COMMENTS F: July 31, 1987 EFC - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shan `�uu L 9 PROJECT TITLE: Park Place L. n FAQ" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project consists of a 115 room hotel , a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and and 40,000 sq.ft. of office space. LOCATION: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediatelt east of I-405 SITE AREA: 5.696 acres BUTLOING AREA (gross): 248,117.76 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health fi 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation / 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED JUL ' 0198T BUILDING 1 ZONING DEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. " .e=( /7, /9f7' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da Form 4 ` RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane) PROJECT TITLE : PARK PLACE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROJECT CONSISTS OF A 115 ROOM HOTEL. A"3.900 SO. FT. RESTURANT AND AN 4Q,.QQn `mod_ FT_ OF OFFICE SPACE. LOCATION : 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY,' IMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-405 MTV OF RENTON RECEOV E JUL 2 01987 TO: P .BUILDING :�� :PT El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : EI ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION •SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: OUTILITIES ENG. DIVISION _ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ° PARKS .& RECREATION DEPARTMENT Ej BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE . COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.m. ON JULY 31. 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ei APPROVED ` APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED l; tch 2. as 3• cz2 ��_'W �/. % ��xGa- - �au D --- ,446 a c � s-6 ' ram, DATE; /y /917 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE V REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 /'x//r//t/A A'7r. oNiy REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS ' ! 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME /2/T 7 ",k F U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS /I00 /7i9P. e I/19/.ce i'/4N4/Ay FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION — CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I — II IV III V FIRE—RESISTIVE NON—COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY �- MIXE (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASICFLOW)D 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: _ 4/�4,5-,' 4 DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): S75-D 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (B) GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% B % OF 6. COMPUTE SUB—TOTAL (B+C): C ) (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) '/3/ 2. S� GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCYGPM CE) AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON—COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT': USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: 1 • SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE o SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. i 0 — 10 25% MAX. NORTH Ez: ADD /S % 1 11 — 30 EAST 31 — 60 20% MAX. 25' ADD ?.O $ 61 —I60 15% MAX. SOUTH • 6 7' ADD /O $ i61 —100 10% MAX. WEST kz' ADD /0 % E 101 OR-1 4—HR WALL 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : _,5:3— (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: Z37// g` GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: y CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: y -_ f_, : - 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: GPM (G) CIF D+E+F-s-G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,030 GPM) '' (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: '76 I. /z5 GPM CH) :t. A/SOO —pm,I. SIGNED: IATE (47 //"/ /9g7 :1 ;i CITY OF RENTON d RE C E 0 V ED ..i JU L 2 01987 BUILDING I ZONING DEPT. 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tsi 0.l r'r DATE CIRCULATED: July 1 , 19R7 COMMENTS DUE: July31, 1987 EFC - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shan & PROJECT TITLE: Park Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project consists of a 115 room hotel , a 3,906 sq. ft. resturant and and 40,000 sq.ft. of office space. LOCATION: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediatelt east of I-405 SITE AREA: 5.696 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 248,117.76 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation - 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: �I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiona inf mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Si re of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 / RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane) PROJECT TITLE : PARK PLACE I' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROOECT CONSISTS OF A 115 ROOM MOTEL._ A"3.900 SO. FT. RESTTTRANT AND AN 4o fl FT. OF OFFICE SPACE. LOCATION : 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY,' IMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-405 TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS .& RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JULY 31, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; eb D E] APPROVED © APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS O NOT APPROVED /AA 0 Q Q° 1� ©,J QQ e J.5 c.J 0 L(J Cs) ce ` GI C`©42) L/-0LJ �j 6 st� qn- 'fo ' ►--,74-fc ' C DATE:! � / d2? SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION-5/1982 Form 182 ■ 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Patr-ICS DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, 1QR7 COMMENTS OUB `Jd"lry 31,; �1°987nn c EFC - 049 - 87 _ hif �;.-. II APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-054-87 , 1 Li! , . _ (1�, PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shang)._ 11,11 PROJECT TITLE: Park Place BU«3& 'l �3 f � BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project consists of a 115 room hotel , a ,901i sq. ft. resturant and and 40,000 sq.ft. of office space. LOCATION: 1800 Maole Valley Highway, immediatelt east of I-405 • SITE AREA: 5.696 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 248,117.76 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health fi 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics !` 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation /\ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS:// �,/ T`1 e Ae-M ya e 2i�ew G.i.- e e a t.%_, PV6?"-fK be/el 61 1/ C/64;9r� 4ail x‘ellew 7L G Cr/41 , /h e /2e,-714.-- d' ced 74- 14'-4 o 74- •12) - fels (i'd 4,- A ve,- O w e 714.o,-e 7L h e'w& L e.,ld �'I a le defCrwei CGS ems!!" !�K •' / a.- fao ,ed exrc dea de6( /111.0 10//eir /Ve h G 74e/ o���r e h/eo-1 / /d .a,fe , edu edo,7L ' we 4iiiC ' Cedar" i2f vel- /J a.0Z e t4e/a" - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise inand have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Da .- r 7 Signs of Director or Authorized Representative Date 612 fra/e/b-c‘"- eile.ri-owe007' am- 7402... Form 4 `a74,2S p' ?- f fa,/ d r t ;?'Pi :/ 7` ov 2 c v,0 -Dy ?' ' fn.?�f_y>y ���, -�41//?f p/91F2c7 7.„1 „3/0.,„, 7,4"..27 t � l y&74. '71 pAt.:?7,2fr 2c/s,w-j, icyog 7c. bra �'! '� g,, p _s • RENT' '.BUILDING & ZONING DEPA, MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane) PROJECT TITLE : PARK PLACE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROJECT CONSISTS OF A 115 ROOM HOTEL. A`3.900 SO. FT. RESTURANP AND_AN 40.ono SQ_. Frr. OF OFFICE SPACE. LOCATION : 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY,' IMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-405 TO: OPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 4 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION . FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS .& RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT [=1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 17jOTHERS : . COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE . COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 31. 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : A,' p6 feec 07Lld# APPROVED MAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS DNOTAPPROVED • Wean'de cL 41r-ac. ( e c l ewe a/'io 9) Ai daiv Z - eu el p a-- S 4-014cer P e it v.eJ 4V•c w�-- i�L��G 6 - 4-4.— ci-e Ce -- Rc'u ev- P _• 3 • ni-w e -/ Pee/ ' - e4.ui 614;we' + c0101,t, w.wh`e .Vr o w-1-- +Le. s Lak,1 is pm ' cL4:111V47,seS4aw1 c e c-ok I!ll erect 4-1 . /he -u-� DATE:n (li4 i 3, / t'? SIGGNA F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZEDL � seed( REPRESENTATIVEE/ v /r `,�C 4 I ad?Si/3 dk TJ!" EVISION 5/1982 Form 182 , , ,,, s,. . .•-. + \,z. .:., . • . . _ ,.. . • . . . , . ,. s. . : , • ' - • • . . . . . ! . . • .„ . . . . . - zt7 ..../1_,- ,, lipa 0 w ---.., / 1 7,w_yv, --- /-..,frbgp 7 __..7oo_nip .. 5, , .)-7 y/./., „0„--__./z ...../,. .zi 7 0..01 -no' .7>ii...„990.,/ ,g&.>/i7 gx :114;,,,,,. 2,79+ . ---dJvf,..r 0A.6f_sr.w 7-- -V-.•,--,1 fivp'° /oh . ._ . . . 1 . . . . _ I . ... „ • . . • . . 1 : . ..; - . , • , . , . , • . . 1 , ycA --)015) ; L . 1 . , . , . . 1 . 1 . . . ) . • , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . - .. . . . . , 1 -\ 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -s--Inl DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, 1987 U COMMENTS DUE: July 31, 1987 EFC - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane PROJECT TITLE: Park Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project consists of a 115 room hotel , a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and and 40,000 sq.ft. of office space. LOCATION: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediatelt east of I-405 • SITE AREA: 5.696 acres BUILDING AREA (gross 48,117.76100 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE • MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION e IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water . 4) Plants 5) Animals HY 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline-Use 9) Housing y� 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: A VWOSSTI-Ito ( P' tc ) St--l0UL0 PROo►€+c TD t-.I N t31W ry orO (A)vc rj/ NE 3?g 5 O TI- ►'��, .� v I-}101,4w t�'`A %�•�A'�r.( Inc c oEr- 1� 1 u/u5-M A ,p is 11-1-Kr 1�-nW vici7 , ) 6 5 Hoc)Lrc) Ir R. S/E '( ss 1 R• pI se m-icipeo Divro bRoNsoK) W 02 3H-oULO rr (3C r l n t1-1 P -m�KCoccn)(.%-( c k, z d . OesIiVVA,� TO 1-V U P�SZ�,I-4 li cru C),,Wou-LiD � c,' NA, -0-14•C bu Iv b I N)( W\ rct+j 16 1 x �l V� a.. Y( We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 42;v L%J • �,,�.. U 0\4- Iq `J Signature of Di etor or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTOOBUILDING & ZONING DEPAIVENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane PROJECT TITLE : PARK PLACE • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROJECT CONSISTS OF A 115 ROOM HOTEL. A 3.900 SO. FT. RESTURANT AND AN 4n.non S . FT. OF OFFICE SPACE. LOCATION : 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY,; IMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-405 TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ej POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ID OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JULY 31. 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ZOIOI>')(f) OAPPROVED [274APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED CO 1\Yv 0,& (..- N C) /1(p l ry(0 NR,(441-(ecrUK Pi L, i 461\1 V TNIROu6ViOu i TNR ,�� ern �,� P x C) e>C L85S $ -'( R 16l4-1 cr () ►sk`( I S TO R LANADscpspg0 ( R GNT>_.O .'O 1 T14 `I"I-4� P--CS1 GY=" TIC 31166 1a-I LL,3I D6 7-0 �s ,vim TO �> > 51Ps&M LOLL) n -CR.E,6 5 YRz13 Mosi 'PLF rut ¶o-Z- '1'I�1'` LOvr✓2�� z, StID81zK v WA-) � CCA I L c6 1.) 3 Trc rs6 DO,vt r s u c ri -T,rq PLtN.s Pam/4Lr ,t:),.. o/Er- -� L�v� c-k_ DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE v REVISION 5/1082 Form 182 a); 31 GuL► Z- CI MCuL1=3-1 lorU C-ouuo ►m pRo O orb a-'13e 14. R 00fit, OF= S PNtKI1U6 -TO C Ze , . .. 1 ,5 I&p SC PM 13LI'\i O (5 s)/41,5 z EGA 0 evi U5A1 L 31-( 51P .3 P .PRouloto 6 cA iz,cuLI3T10&) cc• N e6L cr . Gov vA ►d F t3•Y R, ,o_ucor\)6 111 R-_, ENF • 0 A ,i 11 r`I►Yv),A rv, ' ©' W i n6 C,Nr.)DScp f TO PC ou I U D ito► v, PRoPvo2r-c Le it3 ND C-El ( P UJ sT� 1k 1-4wp,'(a o 1415, toN&Cis Ocs crt 0 611,0)J501Uw( 4 ti 405 N D Iry sI,D6 ays ". \Y7c/ p,,I 1 � C� P r • I �I • - . NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11- 350. RAMAC. INC. Applicatin for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and 40,000 sq. ft. office building on a 5.696 acre site. Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. File Nos. ECF-049-87, SA-054-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by November 30, 1987. Published: November 16, 1987 5/O67 0 ii •pa� � 1. �'1 ill '� 7� 7 rfi��: y,h 7 � a+.. r � I* *1.k j y' q5� 5.r '4 ry'''4t " Sys Y.al'�' 1ti\1 ,f ��' . - 't4 i' '' 1,0 , bo, _. V .� P''. iv' 3. 'fC..}3-4, to •.. ,f- n"? 4.,,,`. 't r "f Y • 4,.,,o- ,.! a �, .0...��r vi� 't >d�� st r.7'l'fr� f�T'. a t:: I . t cfi a) xk' • _ }fit APPLICATION NO. ECF-049-'87, SA-054-87 APPLICANT RAMAC, INC. �IE�il��O���Q1�'�R�b��IOTELLI3A900NSpOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE DEVELOP- FT. RESTAURANT & 40, 000 SQ. FT. OFFICE BUILDING ON A 5, 696 ACRE SITE. GENERAL LOCATION ARID/4R ADi?RESS 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, IMMEDIATELY EAST OF INTERSTATE 405 POSTED T1 1i OT FY BNTE ESTE* PERS4 S OF ko E NAITII ii it+11 `.r E i.,r,T,-k L ACTIlic 4. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ® !;' �� ° O E S JOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE I t,PACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ;ff:t 0 L L tc j�-'�a B L L Nit T F t. BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELI W. COMMENTS MUST E RECEIVED BY . AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P., ., f\IOVEMBER 30, 1987 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. „ 1 . � ' - 1' I. 11, 4_% CITY OF RENTON 1,. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor • Ronald G. Nelson, Director • ' r,5 • October 30, 1987 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building & Land Development Division 450 King County Administration Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 • Mr. Marbett: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Final Determinations of Non-Significance - Mitigated and Environmental 'Checklist for the following projects: • RAMAC, INC SA-054-87, ECF-049-87 HENDERSON HOMES, INC. R-074-87, ECF-067-87 A.L. SLEISTER & SONS ECF-068-87 - If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. S 'ncerely, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP zoning Administrator Enclosures • DE:DB:cb:dskl • LTMarbet 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 : ,... . - ,' ,,i .. _,,-, , , r YP •i, - `_._ I;'.:'.. ;(. I. i, ��Ji , rE., ,-, 0:_,- -.,.--0,-,‘,-'r.`"E'7,';-';:'7,-,,,y= ` tF „'., , I�.�M;,: ,li.' .a. . +. .- _ ,+. ,. ,,,. r,. '• �' ,Ii�,1( ., ,t''`P o-Ka �P'_ •i, "��;�:��i.;'�s ti.''� _ tl ���.. 'J. :1� it.�?5 't ]' q!;P.Nr.�.4' f7 d,' .: ',' ?.41 Off, . 1 .. t' 'f'. ;�� . ' , vt. 1 = ; '•t �� 0,+ • ' CITY OF 'R,ENTON 1 .ri "' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT '' Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Direct&, 4' 2' October 30, 1987 :i,- r' Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 . Olympia, WA 98504 • `{- Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Final Determinations ::r of Non-Significance - Mitigated and Environmental Checklist F for the following projects: RAMAC, INC SA-054-87, ECF-049-871 HENDERSON HOMES, INC. R-074-87, ECF-067-87 A.L. SLEISTER & SONS ECF-068-87 i. r If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. Sincerely, CThealt Et_________. Donald E. Eric , AICP zoning Administrator <: Enclosures DE:DB:cb:dskl f LTWSDE M1 $ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 - CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G.Nelson, Director October 30, 1987 Gary Marbett Building & Land Development Division 450 King County Administrative Bldg. Seattle, Wa. 98104 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Determinations of Significance and Environmental Checklist for the following projects: RaMac, Inc. ECF-049-87,SA-054-87 Henderson Homes, Inc. ECF-067-86,R-074-86 A.L.Sleister & Sons ECF-068-87 If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. Sincerely, 21° Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:plp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 6' Co CITY OF RENTON 'ILL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 30, 1987 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Determinations of Significance and Environmental Checklist for the following projects: RaMac, Inc. ECF-049-87,SA-054-87 Henderson Homes, Inc. ECF-067-86,R-074-86 A.L.Sleister & Sons ECF-068-87 If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. Sincerely, ED Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosures DE:plp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 4$ CITY OF RENTON '°LL - BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 29, 1987 Dan Shane RaMac Inc P 0 Box 653 Renton, Wa 98055 • • Subject: Environmental Review Committee Decision Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find a signed copy of the recent threshold determination of the Environmental Review Committee that was referred to in our previous correspondence. If you have any questions please call. cez yours, 4v4A/ Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • DKE:plp:p1021 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,'Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 `f • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-054-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a• 3,900 sq.ft. resturant and 40,000 sq. ft. office building on a 5. 696 acre site. PROPONENT: RaMac,Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton • 1 The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is nbt required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . ' These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , November 9, 1987, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 ,Phone: 235-2550 DATE OF DECISION: October 21, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: October 26,1987 /1419--" -nald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer uilding and Zoning Director Policy Development Director A/Oa' Alailt-4, Ri rd C. Houghton Pub is Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: RaMac, Park Place ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-055-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. restaurant and a 40, 000 sq. ft. office building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 on-ramp traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6,300.00 for the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the ramp. 2 . That the applicant shall be responsible for designing a new traffic signal and having it installed at the existing entrance to Park Place. It will be the applicant's responsibility to see that the new traffic signal is coordinated with the on-ramp traffic signal to I-405. The signal design shall meet the City of Renton' s existing equipment. 3 . That the applicant provide a crosswalk across the Maple Valley highway at the traffic signal. 4. That the applicant be responsible for the off-site improvements on the north side of Maple Valley Highway along the project site frontage on Maple Valley Highway. 5. That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 6. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 7. That hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 8. That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. 9. That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the site. Determination of Non- mificance Mitigation Measures RaMac, Park Place Page 2 10. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant) from upland properties, the applicant shall provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing canopy trees around the parking areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building and Zoning Department. 11. That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, 1. greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. • ' of CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 26, 1987 . '. Dan Shane 20919 S.E. 34th Issaquah, WA 98027 RE: RaMac, Park Place, ECF-049-87, SA-054-87 Dear Mr. Shane: This letter is 'to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your site approval request for property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway. The Committee on October 21, 1987, decided that your project may be issued a Determination of . Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 on-ramp traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6,300.00 ' for the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the ramp. 2 . That the applicant shall be responsible for designing a new traffic signal and having it installed at the existing entrance to Park Place. It will be the applicant's responsibility to see that the new traffic signal is coordinated with the on-ramp traffic signal to I-405. The signal design shall meet the City of Renton's existing equipment. 3 . That the applicant provide a crosswalk across the Maple Valley highway at the traffic signal. 4. That the applicant be responsible for the off-site improvements on the north side of Maple Valley Highway along the project site frontage on Maple Valley Highway. . 5. That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only 'emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 200'Mill Avenue South - Renton,-Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 October 26, 1987 Page 2 6. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 7. That hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such ', a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 8. That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. 9. That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the site. 10. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant) from upland properties, the applicant shall provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing canopy trees around the parking areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building and Zoning Department. 11. That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end November 9, 1987. Following the end of the comment "period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the October 26, 1987 Page 3 comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner for your site approval. - If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself. or Jeanette Samek-McKague. F e Environs al eview Committee. - - 4' Donald K. Erick , AICP Zoning Administrator ' DKE: '/ NotEnvDet/Dskl 102687 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Revised Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-502 (c) . r RAMAC INC. (PARK PLACE) Application for site plan approval to construct a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 square foot restaurant (Phase 1) and a 40,000 square foot office building (Phase II) . Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway. File Nos. : ECF-049-87, SA-054-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by November 9, 1987. € 'PUBLISHED: October 26, 1987 j RaMac, Inc. October 19, 1987 �I 1, -- 7 t I , „ I O 206g87 l BUJ_LTE G / ?CN►ING DEFT. Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South • Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Park Place Site Plan Approval • Dear Mr. Erickson: I appreciated speaking with you last Thursday concerning the status of the site plan approval for our Park Place project. It was my understanding from our telephone conversation that everything appears to be in order on the items of reconsideration from the Environmental Review Committee and other concerns of the City of Renton . • We are anxious to receive the final site plan approval in order that we might start construction as soon as possible. Please advise us as to the status of this matter and when you anticipate the final approval will be forthcoming. Very truly yours , RAMAC I114ORATED Dan S ane President DS: hgk RaMac, 'Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392-4199 RaMac, Inc. C T'r can R!NTOnN • October 9, 1987 OCT 131987 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washington 98055 RE : Park Place Site Plan ECF-049-87 RaMac Inc. Gentlemen : With respect to the above referenced Site Plan Review and subsequent reconsideration, the following has been agreed upon by the parties involved: 1 . RaMac, Inc. shall be responsible for designing a new traffic signal and having it installed at the existing entrance to Park Place. RaMac, Inc. will see to it that the new traffic signal is coordinated with the on—ramp traffic signal to I-405. This signal shall be designed consistent with the design standards and existing equipment of the City of Renton . 2. The City of Renton, Parks Department, shall contribute $35, 000. 00 toward the new traffic signal . 3. RaMac, Inc. shall be responsible for improving the north side of Maple Valley Highway. 4. The City of Renton, Parks Department, shall be responsible for improving the south side of Maple Valley Highway and any other work deemed necessary on that side of the highway by the Traffic Department. RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392-4199 / Page Two October 9, 1987 Environmental Review Committee 5. RaMac will also provide a crosswalk across the Maple Valley Highway at the traffic signal . The above has been agreed upon this day of October, 1987 . Dan Sha Pr s ' nt RAMAC I CO deATED Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer TRAFFIC ENGINEERING City of Renton John E. Webley, Parks Director PARKS DEPARTMENT City of Renton - • 5 1c �� Qv1�f � OF REN1-01 SEP 221997 B Lr)!I.G /711 N'NG DE PT, September 15, 1987 City of Renton Building and Zoning Department Renton, Washington Attn: Mr . Don K. Erickson Zoning Administrator Dear Mr . Erickson: I am writing you on behalf of the residents of Monterey Terrace in regards to the information you sent us on the RaMac, Inc. , site plan proposal . We have four basic items of concern that we would like to be informed on, and they are: 1. Building heights . 2 . Traffic patterns as to entrance and exists . 3 . Pile driving for buildings , if required. 4. Any disturbance of the bank on the west side of our district . There may be other items which will come out of your E.R.C. committee hearings which could affect us also. We would appreciate your keeping us informed on the above as well as all public hearing dates when you get them set up, so that we may attend. Very my yours , og” r Garrison Mo erey Club President 75 onterey Drive N.E. Renton, WA 98056 LG:rk qt. r t itir ( (4) ) rir Staff Report/Dsk ERC BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: RaMac, Inc. PROJECT: Park Place (Hotel, Restaurant, Office Complex) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO. 'S: SA-059-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Site Approval for development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and 40, 000 s f office LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: "C--128.70le alley Ma X p y Highway, immediately east of I-405. B. ISSUES: C: RECOMMENDATIONS: L D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: More information requested on Public Services with the following comments. 1. How'will pedestrians get to the Carco Park area? 2 . How will southbound Maple Valley Highway traffic be affected by vehicles turning into the facility? Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impacts noted for Public Services with no further comment. Design Engineering: More information requested on Light and Glare, Transportation, Public Services and Utilities. Probable minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements. The following comments were made. 1. Provide offsite improvements for Bronson Way N.E. 2. Improve path on west edge of property. 3. Complete off-site improvements along Maple Valley Highway consistent with this higher use of site. 4. No present pedestrian crossing of Maple Valley Highway--The proposed signed recen? should consider additional Ped phase for MVM X-ing. Traffic Engineering: More information requested on Transportation with probable minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements. The following comments were made. 1. Submittal does not show how access road from NE 3rd Street. Would connect into and service complex. Proposed parking plan would interfer with access road connections. 2. Estimated trip ends will increase from the previous submittal of office only usage of 738 trip ends to 2325 trip ends. This is a 215% increase. A more detailed traffic impact analysis should be provided. 3. Developer should pay percentage of . mitigation to up-grade I-405 ramp traffic signal. Estimated cost to upgrade signal $70,000. Contributing traffic 9% of existing volume. 9% X 70,000 = $6,300 mitigation fee. Utility Engineering: Probable minor impacts noted for Public Services and Utilities with no further comment. Parks and Recreation: Probable major impacts noted for Aesthetics and Recreation. The following comments were made: 1. The hillside greenbelt area on the eastern property boundary offers an excellent opportunity for a pedestrian trail connection for people coming from the north and east who want to• access Cedar River Park without braving the hostile environment along Sunset Blvd. It could also be designed as a site amenity and if a good pedestrian crossing were developed on Maple Valley Highway, hotel and office users could make frequent use of Cedar River Park and the Cedar River. 2. Sidewalk needs to receive a strong landscape treatment. 3. The Parking area northest of the hotel needs a clearly defined and direct pedestrian route to the hotel. 4. Pedestrian linkages on the site should be stronger and accented with landscaping. . -4 5. Outside seating capabilities needs to be expanded on the hotel site and introduced on the resturant and office site. Building Division: Probable minor impacts noted for Earth, Environmental Health, and Aesthetics with no further comment. Zoning Division: Probable major impact noted for transportation and minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements. The following comments were made: 1. A pedestrian walkway (paved) should, be provided to link Bronson Way NE/NE 3rd Street to the Maple Valley Highway. (A cinder pathway is illustrated- Is that adaquate? 2 . Should ingress/egress for traffic be allowed onto Bronson Way N.E. or should it be permitted for emergency access only? 3. It would be desirable to have architectural treatment of all three buildings match, ie: ridge tile roof of restaurant. Policy Development: More information requested for Land and Shoreline Use, Aesthetics, Recreation, and Transportation. Probable major impacts noted for Earth, Land and Shoreline Use, Aesthetics, Recreations Transportation 1. Is there a demand for this use at this location? 2. This use is not compatible with the uses set forth in the Cedar River Strategy. This location is highly visable and if developed will likely set the tone for future development along the river. The Cedar River Strategy suggests Quality development along this highly visable, highly travelled corridor. 3. Additional landscaping should be required to buffer the use from the Highway and from Cedar River Parka 4 This project could have a substantial impact on Cedar River Park. .both from a users standpoint and visually. Hotel guests wanting to use the park will find it virtually impossible unless a' signal or a pedestrian overpass is installed. 5. The applicant should be required to contribute to the park fund. 6. One driveway off Maple Valley Highway 1 accesses the entire project. Is this adaquate? 7. The driveway appears to be located too close to the freeway on ramp to be safe. 8. Access to this project and :to /Cedar River Park may create unsafe driving situations. Perhaps the accesses could be re-designed to be across from each other and a signal installed on the Highway. 9. The applicant did not compute trips/day according to the ITE figures submitted. This project will generate approximately 2275 trips/day on one of the busiest (and worst) intersections in the City. 10. This department recommends that the applicant be required to prepare a traffic study on this project. • 40 sA-cY5-4-87 JOEL E. HAGGARD ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-AT-LAW SUITE 2426, FINANCIAL CENTER 1215 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98161 (206)682-5635 OUR FILE NO: R-19025 September 11, 1987 HAND DELIVERED ( q / p RECEOVED Mr . Donald Erickson c/o City of Renton S :s. A197 Re: Park Place/ECF-049-87 E;gFLI M /zo,Y:wn Er:PT, Dear Don: We have been asked by Mr . Shane to review the SEPA process Renton is using. We have concentrated on the reconsideration. We agree that the reconsideration was appropriate . The record basis for the earlier determination appeared inadequate. We also had concerns under RCW. 87 . 02. 020 . We recognize that you wish us to identify how we interface with a variety of other projects . None of the other projects are part of our proposal. Thus we do not • understand your- re uirin us to conduct eyon a scope of our proposal or have arisen subsequent to UUL appr-c-atrom—Without waiver of any right or claims, TPE has provided a supplemental traffic review dated September 11, 1987 . We would perhaps quibble with your assertion that the failing to provide quick response is punatively res- ponded to by requiring an EIS. Indeed we note (subject to further review) that applicant 's rights, prior City actions and the September 11, 1987 TPE report all provide an ade- quate and reasonable basis for an MDNS with reasonable conditions . Sincere yo rs, J el Haggard JEH/dm 0114d cc: Mr . Dan Shane g CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: PARK PLACE APPLICANT: RaMAC, INCORPORATED APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-054-87 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • -ATTACHED- i r i qi. J , ASSESSOR'S NAME . ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • • I , . I • I i I • • • • a ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • CERTIFICATION , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners an t eir addre were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. • AT TEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and f9r the State of Washington residing at on - l the / day of SIG D: 11EI, 1_�ERR[ -F. L iI`)O , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subjectsplat�p PIt were mailed on `je.K. b- J 957 , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, it nd for the State of Washington residin at e-O tr , on the LA T),, day of �GPTEoitbe-Ey. 1997 SIGNED: ck FORM 190 . 1. FBA T C.H NUMBER: CN 1 - COMMENTS 1 * CUSTOMER NAME ,>RAMAQ C I t'cYc)c**-iefc)'eSc)4)cf2Yd• e�cse•r[Yc�t�[)cYcic9e�cfc)cic�esca'cfe�c�Yfc)c***Pe)'c<2c)'c�[sYicicak)k£tfc):ea:cx'c2c.1t).ltc$c2c*AYAfc**)SYc)c)c)c)k)t)cis 559210-0005-06 559290-0020-00 MONTEREY DEVL CO INC 629800 HOUSER PAUL W a " LILA C1077 _ PO BOX 653 57 MONTEREY DR NE RENTON WA 98057 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0025-05 559290-0030-08 , SHAW DON LEIGHTON 0378 MILLER KEITH 0+FRANCA M 649999 . 63 MONTEREY DR NE 69 MONTEREY ' DR NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98056 559290-0035-03 559290-0040-06 GARRISON LOGAN WHITE W A _- 75 MONTEREY DR NE 81 MONTEREY DR .N E RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0045-01 --- 559290-0050-03 --- - - - - PARKHURST WARREN W 252242 AMES ALBERT ° A 689999 , 87 MONTEREY DR NE 101 MONTEREY DR NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 559290-0055-08 559290-0060-01 PICKERING BRUCE B EXCUTOR DIAMBRI . WM 0 107 MONTEREY DR NE 113 MONTEREY DR NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0065-06 559290-0070-09 WHITE RPISCILLA J 251082 DUCHESNEAU B E 119 MONTEREY OR NE 151 MDNTEREY. DR NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0075-04 559290-0080-07 RIVERA FRITZ P 1175 SHAKESPEARE HV 157 MONTEREY DR NE 163 MONTEREY DR RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0085-02 559290-0090-05 FITTF_RER MARCUS 679800 IGLOL KARL 241071 169 MONTEREY DRIVE NE 153 CAPRI NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98056 559290-0135-02 559290-0140-05 PERETTI RAINIER 242994 KREMER MATT N s INEZ H 56 MONTEREY DR NE 62 MONTEREY DR NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0145-00 559290-0150-02 SULLIVAN PATRICK 0 601834 GIBSON JOHN Z0976 68 MONTEREY DR NE 102 MONTEREY DR NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 • ' .•HUN`TINGTON JAMES SILAS 359999 rrBLENCOE 1276 106 MO,NTEREY. DR NE 112 MONT _ �t DR NE RENTON -WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0165-05 559290-0170-08 FISHER RONALD B C0676 SCHULTZ MICHAEL T & MARY. A 212658 118 MONTEREY DR NE 150 MONTEREY DR NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98056 559290-0175-03 559290-0255-06 HOUSER RICHARD M 0279 OBRIEN •R E 156 MONTEREY DR NE 194 MONTEREY PL NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0260-09 559290-0265-04 AMES ADDISON s LINDA W 399999 LANKESTER HARRY ' L Z0575 188 MONTEREY PL NE 182 MONTEREY PL. NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 17230.5-9003-07 --- 172305-9013-05 -MONTEREY TERRACE ASSOCIATES392809 CITY OF RENTON 18000 PACIFIC' HWY S SUITE 1115 SEATTLE WA 98188 172305-9026-00 - -__-__--- 172305-9083-00 - -- _- - .-_- RIVERW000 LAND CORP 674451 SIELER DONALD E SHIRLEY . 544231 9125 10TH AVE S 205 143RD ST SE SEATTLE WA 98108 EVERETT WA 98204 172305-9102-07 __. . ._�.. ----_--_-- --__---------_--_. 172305-9130-03 GROUP HEALTH COOP OF PUGET SOUND CITY OF RENTON 200 15TH AVE E SEATTLE WA 98102 17 2 3 0 5-917 3-01 _i444 n5 9- 3 .01 ---------- TONKIN FRANK J JR E0630 1911 MAPLE VALLEY HWY RENTON WA 98055 .,.....L.:.:.............40...................................... \/ 1 /i'_r ,i r+— i _.^_,� I a q Flo•1// //` 'i r%/.��_ 7 ._ _ -- - , jg I'0 ' c{Q cq - -$ Y B._- i''—'1 .Ai fir- a .1 //. • / ¼.' ' a I �' ®./ / ( Illiiii I N; tip } J •. . 'r— , ' i// �' w •\I -lf':i .1 ; . _ ._i 4 _ , `_ • ';-�1� ��. '/�'" o„ �`o 4 ) .).„, ., 0 ,-*,,..,,. ./ G. ,i , ,\,,, , 1 ;,! 211/e/ , \,__ („., +.i'ter„ 'h; -21.,1 a i Q, 4441i141 * t i8FR r y / ir" 9 , 1 o - MTCLIVET PARK ,, \, �' ray P/ %/ CEDAR RIVER _\� " 1: I6+ ,, P�. \ 1 — � �7 PARK �� =1# `, s sT: , r ' I `�j q i I I I I „`� -44-,--; ,...--;...„..-- . .:-.N.N,j___-11 1 „.., ,__: 0,_ __ . ,. --,-.,.......„ ‘'...---_---_-_,--- ---::: :,.. A., 0.1 �.\ ` .50 1 Iro ,!1 YY rp �© LL1I I I \ q u \\,,,,. , _.,..,.... , ..N ....--kz, i. %;,,, 1, 2 ill , , 99 I, 1 i— RaMac, Incorporated • SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-054-87 APPL I CANT RaMac Incorporated TOTAL AREA 5.7 Acres a. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Maple Valley Highway EXISTING ZONING B-1, Business Use EXISTING USE Undeveloped, partial foundation of old building permit in place. PROPOSED USE Hotel , Restaurant and Office Building. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial • COMMENTS Application for site plan approval for the construction of a 104 room hotel , a 3,900 square foot restaurant and a 40,000 square foot office building. Located north of Maple Valley Highway and east of the on-ramp to. I-405. 01111 110 ••••• ......,.... ''.._.;,,,..›-.,........:::1,......, .., ,;,' /'...---'-' (i.,.--° ----------.__, •1'.c,-- 4'"..''''',,,'• \ "l''''',„ - • / / '1,1,, ,-,„, • \ \ '....... . .e.,/-1.0.,qt.x i .,... .. \ t ,./ ‘ 1. '''4. --\ ---.L.) /)/ ,i, .r-i lunar c i / ;\ ‘• -.1-, N ' t‘.1i,K, ,, , ,•,,, \ /-';;IYA )/i \. .,„, ,, _ .,. 4 •,4-(:14.,,..... zf • 4•; i \ ‘ •R\ i: ‘1 k?.17-2_,:1,..z.°-,L----...,, _._:- • . - „ -.,,P,_. •--.-0 4.k ! , 11, ..I.,...!! . .•,•• .,,,,.,-.; 1 -., s-t., • -.i •k r•, \ 1 ifirT,/, ' •• •"'/ '`., J.A* ?1, 1 ...I4'Ci, 1 • y. •'P . '.iV." • :t i 114 /'/1')/z '• '.•;.i .•‘, `.: : t, i 1 i ' I,''1 • sr'' '., i '.)- - I / /; '..72/.;''';• .: ' . ,/• . .•• ‘A / 7 1,•'.• ./•. -// • •:f••'''' 'I ',N'Y'.sc .-„,..(•- I'//.....,'\41 ilif. 1 :', / e;;;.1 4.•;-•"" \ • . //N.,,/ '`•W•i II', 11 z 0e./ ,/,,,'„,p'-, , , •4. • ••• '-i•' • 4., ... 4;4 .2•>1. ,,,,,/, ,•• ,.. `,; .,\.\,;•, •, \<4., ..'<•:,:i, I, 1 • . ,..\' / x...,-fe,.•. ,,< ,- ,:, :.›,- 1, 1,.• • t. ' .•-zr',/,'''.:,10;,\'4;;‘,„\s‘ss.,/ -, :1 0.:: \---\_-_-_77),'' \/y,',./.),,,;',.>,7,7.':,-:...--,iA'‘,,',,,....4'--z?•_i,a;0;;',,,,-:-,>,,,,.,.;,,,,,\. „ - - ,;/ 4 ,, ; ; : / (i/-/--•'•"-f..r-.4)),r 0'I ll,i i E „..d'"I:.• • '\i`'' :'-'''s '• '\'--,:// '‘ ' •' ‘. -A, ' xv, ,(4//,',,,c -,:‘, •-• 9,k\,, , ,. -,.. , ..-/'„ •,;(.,;,-,,`(-, • ,--\,,,,-.., .. ":: \ ' :',,,, ul \ \"'A. .,',: 'II:,..,.K.' ;'•-,.‘, - ;=.1.,...;:::\ k;'\''7;:,‘,',,---'43/, ',;,-- '' ',,!j',.''''',1:,;! .•4 \.,,,s..,,,,,: -.,,,‘\7'• >5.- `*_,,‘ ,&.<\\\'<\ ,,\ .,'..(.1...../1-`' ,' ,,,,.',1'1,,, <';,,,,,„.' C<cili ! ni \ t',\\ •\\.. \\•, ,- -Vo'Ns/ )".:74 /. 4.)/ I;-,• N \ \ \ \•• • •• , ' .../A,,,-;,,,,,„,•..„--ri.A.,, \,,,,,„ i: riet.t.,••.,•4/ c,..:y- ‘,;•:.••••,.4.•yd••! ' -y‘,>•••• ,r • V \ •,„\ •.,, \ 4:!..<-.4,,, • ,, ..,,,..fr. sc‹,.., ,,,,A,„;/, ,•,: r' i i$,• A, \ •-\ \<,,, 'kk<'.." , ', '" 4 \`'•:// '.,1 \t i t7', \\,' '''',--s,::'(:',-,‘'s„, "•:‘',.-„.4:' 7.2 \ ' •is\ \\ !' 't \\ "‘ s,•,,,, ;Yt;'11 • '\. ',,,. '... ‘ ; \.• -, '''i' al' \ f \\\ \Ail\ ' ' ' • ' i''. .ic4i• Vit.,,..1.4i, '" A \ , s ,\:.\\'e. .;), .2.1(‘C' i \ \'•• .. il ,i' /i i 1 • ., ..,,, t, , ,,„. N,\%.. /r •,:,,,\',,‘, ::',•4. If i,g `,V txV,;..)? '•• \\\,„„ ,\‘'V\ c'-',. •, ,`,,,,V:„-•,,Hir..121tv 'I ••,.;, \,, .,.\\0,"je.,, • \‘‘,i' * II 0 Z P tn 9 0 II <. \ < / I g g E / '''', 7 ;\,');;,; .• •,'1," ). if;t•i•i', .,e • , il,,..,,, t.r 6 ,,, ,\,\ Y,,,,,,,•,," z , •., , • \‘. ,,,'/, -I ,i, \\\ ' -,,, \' i: .• ?: '4..c ;1.t P, \\ A..t. „ '!•! I. •sli.•:g'"•7' 2-..,‘, \ 5 •,:x., • .4'. •,.." (:••p.!,!.;,:_ :f..' 'i I: r:',.'if 'ii R-• i •-•:. ., g , •, , \ '3. 5''' ••• _., . .:\ t: s. „ •• t,.. -, ,-, \ 1;:\'. \ " i:,. . • I 1-• ,i • \ \,41.1.41.:..111 , , \ / zz• \\. .. , .No. - Date;4.iet-r, Fitrvisod:Shoot 1/1111511111 ilk CAMPUS MASTUR PLAN Drawn:04„.DCn gmAns PROPERTY Chistikod: WARREN LAFON MAPLO VALLEY HIGHWAY ARCHITECT RENTON,WABNINOTON of Job NO.. ' '.'-•----'• .---74- •' '-3-'-.--;7'-,.."'''S',V,I.,':'.:•':?,-.'::'7-%-:'-e--::;-:',?-:,:;."-.7.-''.-.;,;-*.--, -K•r::'"-,.'",-.,1,7,Ci:-.;-;;-,'. =',,,--.„zr-.. --. 4 7.--`.2'Z.,...1,",1,1,.,:i,-"•3^---,--'-., , -, ;,,--:::. ;'--,,-..- ,-;;;;3........,i-1:47,.....:;..---''.".4?ifV:.`-‘-.:-..-1.--c•C:ci...Y..:::,:',.-':.-,::;',i:-•;....'•:-.,:.:;•-•1•?;••,:-..?.:::;',.:':-':6•3.!;z:,:a;'.s7';;;',.....-:"•45:,r,,,-,,t.,_,--';•:'iti,,V-',.'4•Z;i1",,s-i•,•'':;7•.}-4`•f•-•Pr''.1•'' .4.7-•,,-,-,07-,,d.,-::::•:,-,..4,-;4.z.-:,,..7:ys.7-v„,---z42,:,::,_--4.-„,.t. .-_,..,-1,0.,•iii-,7,,.:,,i;;;•-,;:,•:7'.---7:-•-f..!---,•-q1,•,;‘,"-:ze-,4,-,,;;;,,,,,Er ,,p,1-t.,*;itt.,?".•,:,:;hf W..;•:::::1.:i.''• . r-,-••l-cz, -..,le,,,ItTri,.?.1.-fi':M..:--,lifi--..i:t.-•,-,;i7,-.,--,;;;-.,,,;',':AS,,,:;., ';:.1.,-.,-..1,;.....!,q:51-'l .-.-X;-:4-4.1::t4,.:::41:7....let;L:.‘4FZ4ii.:1;,'-'%Vi'-,.)..40"-'14:.. .-""-V1-7. "1,-4:-,,,----i....ZI'-'.'skS2-(.?....:',..;',.--F'r.,r ,-kl‘0-.1...":-*-1;9,-.`r.f-N,`4,;;,-.,,,,-,-,.., ,i'..‘„-,t?;;,::::-„;.!.:!\.-,,,./..1,;-;,;;;;":4_,1,,,1----,.:,;.--,./,..-`,.;'..:',.7:•:',/,;,,.."-;.,;1•,?.-,,,,;,....7..i.::,.;-,-.-,-;-..-':7;:-.:!:;2'....!1,-;;;;';;...';':.*-,-,-,......-;.1 ....,Z,;..!:,,-;:-7,-,:k5.4-''..1,Z27.._-'?,N--iA'',-,-. 71,,,i .:,-,S;0.,,;*4Z:.f:X4,5;k_-,,,;...,y..-;:.--'.L?;.::.,1,..,-,k-':;;-.4:...:!:7•P,-7,-..,,t,, ,,F.- Yi."..-7.',-.1'.-::11•7;.-7,:es15,-'..'.'.-.'-.",--•-',‘,..,:,,',':.-;!„.':-.::;,',.. ''-:.S. ..1-..,...'i:•:,:-'...''i?';:'•:.5',...`....•%•:::•.si:•...•3'•)•--:.••": •";.••:•'.1..':...•,-',';?';',•',:'-',::::•';'-r..-:.‘"*".•;.-'.• ••,,,5:"(ii.-.1,;,..1:i'.:;"ii,:;'4.-';;;?,,?•-';`?",J,"-1.„7.1.‘!;f-ri'•77;.`„,•-64 ,•:.7:')`•;-1%*: ?•:.•*;•'2.: ••-•t'•;1''',=';' 7;••••-•:.:: :::t."•‘-'•'::::. •, .."..3..)':.•-•-`:::`,.:-.•;.-r.:...7.:',...•.,-'-‘-•::•:...•••=;•.:!•.:•••,:-.,;•'•:.'•'-:,.',..:,--..;;; .:.;I:--•••••••c:::.!....:'..,1;•.;;;.'•":'...:'•••'.-.-'.''•:-`:-.; •,.?!.:•:-.-:',")..-:•::"...;'-',..;:.;•• •••••:::::::. ..-.' ..,:•,‘;'.:•.. ...,4,.-.-::;;;;:'-,..-1.--::-. :'.:':;"";":"';'''.---•'.•.:2' .. ' • •:-2.'-r•-:-:' .'-:-..-:".:`).:::2=‘,L",':`,"::z:':•:2:.L...,',. .ci,Y.,1-^:.•.,?,-: ;••••;•:--.'";k:••••:::.1,..,-'!•:;.::::1 *.., 4-',:•':.•,:',!,:•,••*•-':•••••-":;•:•':-..•••-.••'•-•":-.:"••••: .,•:----1%':::":.•..::•••: ••'.",......--'-•-:''..',•••' :.`-:-..,: •7•:'•-••1•.::. •- - -," •.:. --•-:,:: - • - - s-".:,.•7.,'.-;,•• ••••::-'•'••••••2.'•-•';'::.'',.'•i'•••'-':•..:!'••.... :•-•-•::,•:':- :--",' •-.•••••'.,. - ••••••.'..••".'',.:-i.:..'."''..::-.:-','''''';';'.'''..:-.;'f:-.--.,....;';,":.;,-;•.',.,...•,--:...-;:.:,.....2.; . ., . - '. . - '• . ..- . --'• •--.-'. *••:-..f--'';,---:-..:•.:-...---:.:. ....- ''':;-":.;:.--1:.• • :-'' ,.•••••,.-;;;:-.-•,''...,:.--.::-: .'r.-•-':': •,::;17:-:-%'',.-2..••:-;';'•--.-....-..;.-2.::-;--',-.!".,‘---'1..'.:-;''...2...'....,'''..., • - . . • . . . . • .. . •• ''' •-. ' .• ' , •, .•-•,... . .,. ., r.. . • . • . . , ,."......:":- :‘ ,....•.:1 ' .' ':. ''''' • • - . • . . •, . . . . .. . ‘:',,... .. •'... ..,. .... ::.:.:14.• . '• . n... :•.:, . ;'';....2:..... .:':;... ..'....': , '1 :,:,.:•'?:2,1^ '''',..'....'''''...')::'..,....,:i,-..';...hi.:'.. ...:::'... • . • :-: •,. '''''Y';•': ... '.::. .. ' • • ' . . . , , • ''.-.....tS::.Z'::.:..'.'''...,:.:•• i',-..:1:::::;>f:... ; . -•'...',;.'..'....r.:' •..; '....1.....;::•.'1.'7';''''.":::::C:'.Y•f::':'.11'''.1.'•':......•'f.,.;:','..1.;'..!:;"•:f'r•l,'::''''.....,.,'7:.;:,;3):::,; i•.:,: . :• . ' ...' . .' '' . . . •. . .. • . :• :1':'.:''''•••''''...:''''':•,......,,:•;...'.'.f:''',,',.... '. .7.........,....,..,'.t.:.'.•..... .'....,:,...:!:.C:........‘.'.....!::..''...'':'-'''.';„....,.':•':,'..%:.:'''Z';':::...,,•,'::::..;.•!;,':>•,••••,::,.....•::,.•:.....;.'; •• '.:•'.•;;S.7.};.:•.*:''':"...1*. ..;,......'.;2•'''i::!.'.''''... ........-t•i.,•' '...,.;•••,r, '. 1 .;: ..... „...'..,..,ne•c-L...,-.i,;.:-.• s,.-..7,--..-•'. ,.,:---;.ji.-..,,,s,-,.,:,--...--:..--,.::,' .';:-.,::.::::.;',..,:----.:,.....;:7-::::•:•-•••-,..,:-'.....'----',;,',,:,-,..1,..',C,-E--,;"::::-•-•4....,•::,- • • .:;-••••••-,:;,...:.,.-.:-. '-'4-1t•t::=,.'31,::;/._':,•,-;:';';'....''.;‘"::'1';',i';;;::-..:,--.:.;,.-:-*•„f:i;_z'1:,..'•;-..,..:::-,',4....••;:•,-'.,.f.-:;:i-,,;--..7:4',. ..,.::-,.-:,,':-:-.,.,:,z,,;-„':6',..,;;;;-:;',.f:,,;_:::„-,:-.,::,.i..-.,,,•,.../-„-,-,:z1-;:f,-;.....,:ii.:1;,,c, fa:I', '7,7,7;•;:,',:;•,41J:j •T.,:ii,,---"?,,i..*';.'4'C:;:s.„'-';',t,t,;,,,.:;;,...-tfim4lti:-.7.„0....4*Z'.4.Z.?;iir.-1,-I'''...%•;:,'.;::•''•' '''..,-•;7,:',1;-•'-:;'-f..,-;''' ..---.,i.l:',:P'::,,fii..j.:,:.;•'.i.:::-:,:,i;',',.;, .i...',.•(6:11;;-:•,;,:..--'...-:•:,:z'.;;;;•1.:;•Y..1;*:1{toVOI:t.''.,.;64e,4:i..;4,rii,#1-53-_-,-.;,13,1?!.,‘;It.:•••,g);,;t,iti*Y.a 4liiiplF:',;9:il •'-'7.--'''7::•‘-*7---'4‘..1.''',.--,-,---,-',...,--14:4,..4 ',./.r-,---;,-- 4,7,-,..x,,,,,,,;.,-,•-i 51,,k../.: v,,,.,-4,,. -.,.,,,,,,',..-..„..:„...t.,,.,,,,,,:,,,,,,.7.*-,?....,.'-,.-..•::.:,...1.,";;‘,.... .';:;;!,..;...,-.,:::,!1_S:',:-1......,,....,,.. .-..,-,.-,?..:-,?--Lis...:4.,;:'...•..:-.-!....t.,-;.1!..,1(,,,-,,_!.I,.,,-,-,,, .1:,,,,,,,...„--_,„..;-...,-...,4-... ..,.,-..-.....:,,,(„-..%.,-,.....,,,..;.,,,I;s.,..,,,,, _-..::;,,-.,---t.-7-1,,,.!--;XT.,f,f,"1:,,,-i";:..2`.;?.--`,..,:„v.:.'"%;:..-',":-4.i.i,...'7,:s.::-••'••:'....•,:•••-..;••••:`:.•,;•:-.., ••••,•••-•-•••.:••.!;',/••.-:;-&-.C:';',z4,•',•••,:..!;••••:.','•-,:'.•:.:r••,',....,,....:•.•!. ..•-•:•-"•:-:Z•••••'"..f .'..':--:.:.:•'.',,-.2;:•:,: !-•!!•:.-.'-:;•,..--.4.-',.-:1-'•--F:•••;::'-'-1-7,•••-''.:*.-•'7,•E:::.:F 7:.7'''.'..'' .':';'....1:',"...: ''''.::::..:',',..:';.:'''''''',7,'...Z:%',...,"''':'...:"';''.','''`;',°:4'....,,,-''r:'''''..'"'•'' . ."',.: .'.;:';7..---''VN'-`-i,:-j);,-t-,-e-'.'...--'--,...-,-,;.'..S...'.,•:"',-!‘:;".""':-''':-,...;:,-f i'..-..;,,--:•-•:,-,.:,-,:--;. - '".:.-;.-'.q. • •_;i'.,141,-,;;•.':...:,!..u.:''-1.-.-,,,-",i;,.:c.-:::;',....".--'---':;v.•-•-...-•.--i':.-.!::-....:,-'-4-...,:),-',....,.:',..'-:‘,.%'' -....:::::-;`...:;.;:-'-''','/..:',,-,..', -..:;.---,.,;17';'-:.!...S.::,1.-V;;`•'-'-f-".::,-"-'''''` -""..- -:'-• .‘ . .. ..• . - • .• • , • . .. ., . . . ,(b1/64,i0 4'0 • CITY OF RENTON LA POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor September 3, 1987 Dan Shane Ra Mac, Inc. P.O. Box 653 Renton, WA 98054 RE: Park Place Environmental Reconsideration, ECF-049-87 Dear Mr. Shane: The Environmental Review Committee reconsidered their earlier Determination of Non-significance - Mitigated, issued originally on August 20; 1987 . After a careful review, the Committee felt that it had no other choice but to revoke its earlier decision because it felt there was insufficient information to make a determination of non-significance at this time. Because of major concerns about traffic ingress and egress to the site as well as regional traffic impacts from major proposed new developments in the immediate area, the Committee stated that it needed an updated traffic study from you. This study should show how your project will interface with the ERADCO rezone proposal (R-008-87) , the Centron rezone proposal (R-073-87) , Monterey Terrace, and the City's proposed Community Recreation Center, across Maple Valley Highway. Since- both the State Environmental Policy Act and Renton' s Environmental Ordinance require a quick determination, the Committee decided that it would need a response from you no later than September 11, 1987, giving the Committee the authority to delay making a final decision and identifying who your traffic consultant will be (you may wish to run a few names by Gary Norris, the City's Traffic Engineer for concurrence on their acceptability, as well as the specifics the City is looking for in such a study) . If the Committee has no response from you by September 11, 1987, it has asked me to inform you that it would have no alternative but to issue a Determination of Significance which would trigger the preparation of an environmental impact statement or the changing of the proposal so that there were no probable significant environmental impacts (WAC 197-11-360) . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 Dan Shane ' Park Place Environmental Reconsideration, ECF-049-87 September 3 , 1987 Page 2 The Committee did agree with you that it probably did not have sufficient information to substantiate the estimated traffic mitigation fee of $188 per vehicle trip. Hopefully, with this new traffic information, a more realistic figure can be developed. If I can be of any assistance to you, please feel free to contact me. On behalf of the Env' mental R ommitt Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE: V 4* RaMac, Inc. September 2, 1987 CITY Cr--- RENTON HAND DELIVERED _5 S.. L/ L� 1 198,7 I BUILDING / ZONING DFPT. Mr. Jerry Lind Land Use Inspector City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Parking allotments Park Place Dear Jerry: This letter will verify my conversation with you some time ago that the total number of rentable rooms for the Silver Cloud Motel has been reduced from 115 rooms to 104 rooms. The parking spaces provided for the three areas in the Park Place development are as follows : 1 . Silver Cloud : 104 spaces for units 6 spaces for 9 employees TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 110 2. Shari ' s : 3900 square feet 39 required spaces TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 41 3. Office Building : 40, 000+ gross square feet 38, 400 net rentable space TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 192 This should provide the information you requested. Very truly yours, RAMAC, INCORPORATED ar",- Dan Shane President DS : hgk RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392-4199 • RaMac, Inc. August 26, 1987 • Environmental Review Committee i � 1 f • 6'� ; City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South 219�'� Renton;Washington 98055 �j RE: RaMac, Inc. (Park Place) SiteApproval ( ECF-049-87 SA-054-87) SIG Z® ���� Dk�� PP � '�D�LD1 • Dear Committee Members: • • We received a letter dated,August 17, 1987,from Mr. Donald Erickson,Zoning Administrator for the City. Among other comments made in the letter was a statement that the Environmental Review Committee had decided that in order to mitigate "anticipated future traffic impacts" I would be required to pay a traffic mitigation fee of $188 per trip for the 2330 project generated trips. This condition was apparently included in an initial MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE which had an effective date of August 20, 1987. The MDNS indicates that Renton will not act on the proposal until fifteen days from August 20th in.order to allow any interested parties to submit written comments. We infer that this means any comments received within fifteen days would be considered prior to the final mitigated MDNS. We request your reconsideration particularly on Condition No. 10 in the MDN . Until such time as( you have acted upon the reconsideration, we assume that the 14-day appeal period mentioned in 1 your August 20th notice would not start to run. Please confirm this so that we are not required to .file a premature appeal. We are interested in reviewing with you all the information on file, any questions you have and any other concerns in order to assure that appropriate conditions.are required by the City. The appropriateness of the conditions obviously depends upon the facts, the studies,other information you have available, as well as other legal matters. We believe that a reconsideration and discussion between us and all interested parties may help to appropriately • resolve our concerns so that the right job is done. • • Please respond as soon as possible with respect to this request for reconsideration because of tl) pending deadlines for a possible appeal. We look forward to meeting with you and any appropriate parties at the earliest convenience. Very truly yours, RAAC RATED an Shane a✓i %���� ::: . nt • `WW1 % �"` /2 1:" ' r2 • `Ij( "71 • a4/4 cc: Ronald Nelson Richard Houghton Larry Springer Larry Warren, Esq. • S Joel Haggard, Attorney at Law RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392-4189 b---(5)0 OF R11, �� ® Z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR ma o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0RTFD SEPTE_ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: August 27, 1987 TO: Dick Houghton, Public Works Director Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Larry Warren, City Attorney Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: Ron Nelson, Building & Zonii'ig Director SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. ERC-049-87,SA-054-87 AND MERLINO PROJECT ON EAST VALLEY ROAD I would like to have a meeting regarding the above referenced projects on Monday, August 31st at 2:30 p.m. It would be in the third floor conference room. Please advise if you are unable to attend. RGN:plp:p1-076 OF RA,� . $ ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR -it., ill MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 � 0941, coe*P SEPf BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: August 27, 1987 TO: Dick Houghton, Public Works Director Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Larry Warren, City Attorney Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. ERC-049-87,SA-054-87 AND MERLINO PROJECT ON EAST VALLEY ROAD I would like to have a meeting regarding the above referenced projects on Monday, August 31st at 2:30 p.m. It would be in the third floor conference room. Please advise if you are unable to attend. RG'N:plp:pl-076 • af)r '/,2;y1(>-;"/ e>th 3Q � � RaMac, Inc. August 26,.1987. _ .. Environmental Review Committee . ;�' � �- `; City •of,Renton : . _ ' • 200 Mill.Avenue South . Renton,Washington 98055. RE: RaMac, Inc: (Park place) Site Approval ( ECF-049-87,SA-054-87) � iiDj , • Dear Committee Members:. . , `'.. We received a letter dated,August 17, 1,987,from Mr:Donald Erickson,:Zoning Administrator for the City. Among other comments made in'the letter was a statement that-the Environmental:Review.; ., Committee;. had decided that in:order:to.mitigate."anticipated future traffic impacts I would be '`,;', .' :" required to pay,a traffic mitigation-fee of$188 per trip' for the 2330 project generated trips: ::::: . ' '::This condition was:apparently included in.-an. initial MITIOATED DETERMINATION OF NON-: `: :a : SIGNIFICANCE which'had an effective,date of August'20, ,1987.. The MDNS indicates that.Renton will not act-on the.:pr.Oposal until fifteen days from.August 20th'in order to allow any:interested- .parties to submit written comments. We infer.that this means.any;comments received within` . ; • ": • fifteen days would be considered` prior to the.final mitigated MDNS. We request your'reconsideration particularly-on Condition No.•10 in the MDNS. Until such time, as _,; ,.: you have acted upon the reconsideration, :.we assume,that the 14-day appeal period mentioned in your August 20th notice would not start to run.:.Please confirm this so that we are not required to ' :; ;•'.` .file a premature appeal We are interested=in reviewing with.you,all the,information on file',any :'.•.;. > questions you have and any other concerns 'in order to assure that appropriate conditions,are. required by the City. The appropriateness':of.the conditions_obviously depends upon;the facts,'the studies,other information you have available,,`as'well as other legal,matters. :We,believe that a • .' ',•; ,':.''_ . .',;.• .reconsideration and discussion between us and all interested parties may help to appropriately: ; resolve our concerns so that the right-job is done, ' Please respond as soon as possible with respect to this request.for reconsideration because of the; ;;. pending deadlines for a possible appeal.We look forward,to meeting with you and any appropriate ,' parties at the earliest convenience. - • '. _ • Very truly yours;. : : RAh�AC RATED • �_�._ .. ..: • an Shane . • President :. „ DS:hgk • cc: Ronald Nelson • • Richard Houghton Larry Springer . , " Larry Warren,.Esq. ; Joel Haggard, Attorney at Law RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653,nRenton, Washington 98057•• (206) 392-4199 40 CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 21, 1987 Washington State Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Final Determination of Non-Significances and Environmental Checklist for the following Projects: E & H Properties R-016-87 ECF-013-87 E & H Properties SA-055-87 ECF-050-87 Craftsman Homes R-039-87, PP-040-87, V-041-87 ECF-036-87 Hernando Chaves PP-035-87 ECF-031-87 X RaMac, Inc. SA-054-87 ECF-049-87 City of Renton ECF-063-87 Longacres Racetrack SA-064-87 ECF-055-87 St. Matthews Lutheran Church CU-066-87 ECF-065-87 City of Renton SA-056-87, SP-057-87 ECF-052-87 If ou have any questions please call 235-2540. incer y e..1.41 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator s Enclosures • DE:DB:ss 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • 9$ . CITY OF RENTON NA i BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 21, 1987 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building & Land Development Division 450 King County Administration Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Mr. Marbett: Transmitted herewith are copies of the Final Determination of Non-Significances and Environmental Checklist for the following Project: E & H Properties R-016-87 ECF-013-87 E & H Properties SA-055-87 ECF-050-87 Craftsman Homes R-039-87, PP-040-87, V-041-87 ECF-036-87 Hernando Chaves PP-035-87 ECF-031-87 >c RaMac, Inc. SA-054-87 ECF-049-87 City of Renton ECF-063-87 Longacres Racetrack SA-064-87 ECF_-055-87 St. Matthews Lutheran Church CU-066-87 ECF-065-87 City of Renton SA-056-87 ECF-052-87 If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. 'ncere , Do .. Erickson, 'AICP Zoning Administrator Eclosures DE:DB:ss 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 / _ Q' CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-054-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site approval for construction of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and 40,000 sq. . ft. of office. PROPONENT: RaMac Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act ' on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 20, 1987 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m.September 4, 1987, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: August 12, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 20, 1987 Ma' I ,.vLJ Ronald G. Nelson ( Larry M. Spring r �- Building and Zoning Director Policy Development. Dir ctor . . ` . �J Q Richar C. Houghton Public Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: RaMac, Park Place ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-055-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site approval for development of 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. restaurant and 40, 000 sq. ft. of office space. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. CONDITIONS: 1. That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the site. 2 . That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. ' 3 . That hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 4. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 5. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 on-ramp traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6, 300. 00 for the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the ramp. 6. That the applicant provide a detailed traffic impact analysis to the satisfaction of the City's Traffic Engineer to identify additional traffic mitigation measures. 7. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant) from upland properties, the applicant shall provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing canopy trees around the parking areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building •and Zoning Department. 8 . That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. Determination of Non- Inificance Mitigation Measures RaMac, Park Place Page 2 9 . That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 10. In order to mitigate anticipated future traffic impacts from this project, the owners of the site shall be required to provide a traffic mitigation fee of $188 per trip for the 2330 project generated trips by means of a bond or other means acceptable to the city or agree, by means of a covenant, to participate in a future LID for traffic related improvements identified in a future regional traffic impact mitigation study. Note: The applicant will be credited for participation in the traffic impact mitigation study, as well as for any off-site traffic improvements identified from this study or provided for in advance of the study recommendations. Excess fees will be returned to the applicant or owners of the site. , 4 , EN '4) I :11. ;d1' sTAL DEcLa it APPLICATION NO. ECF-049-87, SA-054-87 APPLICANT RAMAC INC. (PARK PLACE) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 11� ROOMDIOTEL, ASE'IOO,SQ. FT. RESTAURANT (PHASE I) & A 40,000 SQ. FT. OFFI( GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION • DOES ► DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL r WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THISPROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE yy/ COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY SLPI� E4,o19�87 • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON. HEARING EXAMINER • BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. • DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee ,being first duly sworn on oath states 'ERC) has issued a Declaration of NON- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED for the follow- mg project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursu- VALLEY DAILY NEWS ant to WAC 197-11-350. CRAFTSMAN HOMES,INC. • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Application to rezone approximately 9.96 acres of property from G-1 to R-1 and appli- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers cation for preliminary plat to subdivide the are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six e andallowlylots application for varrian ce to two months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published pipestream lots. Property located on the in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King west side ando 2100Duval! Avenue N.E. between.:the 1800 2100 blocks. File Nos.: ECF- County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal 036-87,R-039-87,PP-040-87,V-041-87. newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for HERNANDO CHAVES (POLLOS County. ESTATES) King Application for preliminary plat approval of a 16 lot single family subdivision on 3.52 acres. Property located at 2116 Aberdeen The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Avenue N.E.,at the northwest corner of the , Renton Edition _!,______, Auburn Edition _ , (and not in intersection of N.E. 20th Street and Aber- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Peen Avenue N.E. File Nos.: ECF-031-87, PP-035-87. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a RAMAC INC.(PARK PLACE) Application for site plan approval to con- structNotiva of is rivifonii.enta�. Lbl.ertiiiarLi-ori a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 square foot rctaurant (Phase I) and a 40,000 was published on Atli,:,u s t .. y 1 2U 7 R21;68 . square foot office building (Phase II). Prop- erty located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway. Fila Nos.:ECF-049-87,SA-054-87. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 P.M. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the September 4, 1987,will not be considered. corn- sum of $ 3l6.`0 mencee following a y t epfinalizzation ofeal periodIIDNS The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review �� � � !_`��� Committee are available at the Building —{�! .f �, and Zoning Department, Municipal Build- ing, Renton,Washington. Phone 235-2540. Published in the Valley Daily News August 20, 1987.R2468 Subscribed and sworn to before me this._day of.btu,.us t 19 b`( ___.__ ------__...-_.....___-. _677(/' Notary blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, ,.. , . . ,. i'.-i r-.t4 King County, Washington. ‘fj/J �_- VDN#87 Rev sed 11 86 . . , , li ‘._, I---r 'I a ' . .i . . I IAy DF1 T. NotEnvDet/Dskl DNSM820 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON • The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Declaration of NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. CRAFTSMAN HOMES, INC. Application to rezone approximately 9.96 acres of property from G-1 to R-1 and application for preliminary plat to subdivide the subject property into 44 single family lots and application for variance to allow two pipestem lots. Property located on the west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. between the 1800 and 2100 blocks. File Nos. : ECF-036-87, R-039-87, PP- 040-87, V-041-87. HERNANDO CHAVES (POLLOS ESTATES) Application for preliminary plat approval of a 16 lot single family subdivision on 3.52 acres. Property located at 2116. Aberdeen Avenue N.E. at the northwest corner of the intersection of N.E. 20th Street and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. File Nos. : ECF-031-87, PP-035-87. XRRAMAC INC. (PARK PLACE) / hpplication for site plan approval to construct a 115 room hotel, a 3, 900 square foot restaurant (Phase 1) and a 40,000 square foot office building (Phase II) . Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway. File Nos. : ECF-049-87, SA-054-87 This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 P.M. September 4, 1987, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton°s Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington. Phone 235-2540. • PUBLISHED: August 20, 1987 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director • August 17, 1987 Dan Shane 20919 SE 34th Issaquah, Wa 98027 RE: RaMac Inc. (Park Place) Site Approval (Files ECF-049-87, SA- 054-87) Dear Mr. Shane: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your conditional use request for property located on the north side ,of Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of 1-405 . The Committee on August 12 , 1987 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the site. 2 . That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. 3 . That hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 4 . That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Dan Shane • August 17, 1987 Page 2 5. That the applicant, in order to mitigate 1-405 on-ramp traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6, 300. 00 for the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the ramp. 6. That the applicant provide a detailed traffic impact analysis to the satisfaction of the City's Traffic Engineer to identify additional traffic mitigation measures. 7. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant) from upland properties, the applicant shall provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing canopy trees around the parking areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building and Zoning Department. 8. That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. 9. That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 10. In order to mitigate anticipated future traffic impacts from this project, the owners of the site shall be required to provide a traffic mitigation fee of $188 per trip for the 2330 project generated trips by means of a bond or other means acceptable to the city or agree, by means of a covenant, to participate in a future LID for traffic related improvements identified in a future regional traffic impact mitigation study. Note: The applicant will be credited for participation in the traffic impact mitigation study, as well as for any off-site traffic improvements identified from this study or provided for in advance of the study recommendations. Excess fees will be returned to the applicant or owners of the site. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end September 3, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to Dan Shane • August 17, 1987 Page 3 establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. For the 77r went 1 iew Committee, d' Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG:ERCDETLR rp < { • ( (4) ) Staff Report/Dsk ERC BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT _ AUGUST 12, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: RaMac, Inc. PROJECT: Park Place (Hotel, Restaurant, Office Complex) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-049-87 - APPLICATION NO. 'S: SA-059-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Site Approval for development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and 40,000 sq. ft. of office on a 5.696 acre site. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the north side of Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I- 405. B. ISSUES: .Whether sufficient provisions have been made for internal pedestrian circulation on site between buildings as well as through the site for pedestrians attempting to reach or return from Cedar River Park and the proposed Community Center there? .Whether noise impacts from I-405 and Maple Valley Highway will be mitigated? .Whether sufficient measures have been taken to reduce visual blight from roof top mechanical equipment, lighting, etc. that could impact upland properties that overlook the site. .Whether vehicle circulation has been sufficiently well worked out to minimize delays on Maple Valley Highway during AM peaks? .Whether the site can accommodate the amount of development requested without undermining the stability of existing slopes and grades? .Whether the site is appropriate for office, hotel or restaurant use given its close proximity to Cedar River Park? C: RECOMMENDATIONS: D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: More information requested on Public Services with the following comments. 1. How will pedestrians get to the Carco Park area? 2. How will southbound Maple Valley Highway traffic be affected by vehicles turning into the facility? Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impacts noted for Public Services with no further comment. Design Engineering: More information requested on Light and Glare, Transportation, Public Services and Utilities. Probable minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements. The following comments were made. 1. Provide offsite improvements for Bronson Way N.E. 2. Improve path on west edge of property. 3. Complete off-site improvements along Maple Valley Highway consistent with this higher use of site. 4. No present pedestrian crossing of Maple Valley Highway--The proposed signed recen? should consider additional Ped phase for MVM X-ing. Traffic Engineering: More information requested on Transportation with probable minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements. The following comments were made. 1. Submittal does not show how access road from NE 3rd Street. Would connect into and service complex. Proposed parking plan would interfer with access road connections. 2. Estimated trip ends will increase from the previous submittal of office only usage of 738 trip ends to 2325 trip ends. This is a 215% increase. A more detailed traffic impact analysis should be provided. 3. Developer should pay percentage of mitigation to up-grade I-405 ramp traffic signal. Estimated cost to upgrade signal $70, 000. Contributing traffic 9% of existing volume. 9% X 70,000 = $6,300 mitigation fee. Utility Engineering: Probable minor impacts noted for Public Services and Utilities with no further comment. Parks and Recreation: Probable major impacts noted for Aesthetics and Recreation. The following comments were made: 1. The hillside greenbelt area on the eastern property boundary offers an excellent opportunity for a pedestrian trail connection for people coming from the north and east who want to access Cedar River Park without braving the hostile environment along Sunset Blvd.. It could also be designed as a site amenity and if a good pedestrian crossing were developed. on Maple Valley Highway, hotel and office users could make frequent use of Cedar River Park and the Cedar River. 2. Sidewalk needs to receive a strong landscape treatment. 3 . The Parking area northest of the hotel needs a clearly defined and direct pedestrian route to the hotel. 4. Pedestrian linkages on the site should be stronger and accented with landscaping. 5. Outside seating capabilities needs to be expanded on the hotel site and introduced on the resturant and office site. Building Division: Probable minor impacts noted for Earth, Environmental Health, and Aesthetics with no further comment. Zoning Division: Probable major impact noted for transportation and minor impacts noted for all other environmental elements. The following comments were made: 1. A pedestrian walkway (paved) should be provided to link Bronson Way NE/NE 3rd Street to the Maple Valley Highway. (A cinder pathway is illustrated- Is that adaquate? 2. Should ingress/egress for traffic be allowed onto Bronson Way N.E. or should it be permitted for emergency access only? 3. It would be desirable to have architectural treatment of all three buildings match, ie: ridge tile roof of restaurant. Policy Development: More information requested for Land and Shoreline Use, Aesthetics, Recreation, and Transportation. Probable major impacts noted for Earth, Land and Shoreline Use, Aesthetics, Recreation, Transportation 1. Is there a demand for this use at this location? 2 . This use is not compatible with the uses set forth in the Cedar River Strategy. This location is highly visable and if developed will likely set the tone for future development along the river. The Cedar River Strategy suggests Quality development along this highly visable, highly travelled corridor. 3. Additional landscaping should be required to buffer the use from the Highway and from Cedar River Park. 4. This project could have a substantial impact on Cedar River Park. .both from a users standpoint and visually. Hotel guests wanting to use the park will find it virtually impossible unless a signal or a pedestrian overpass is installed. 5. The applicant should be required to contribute to the park fund. 6. One driveway off Maple Valley Highway accesses the entire project. Is this adaquate? 7. The driveway appears to be located too close to the freeway on ramp to be safe. 8. Access to this project and ,to /Cedar River Park may create unsafe driving situations. Perhaps the accesses could be re-designed to be across from each other and a signal installed on the Highway. 9. The applicant did not compute trips/day according to the ITE figures submitted. This project will generate approximately 2275 trips/day on one of the busiest (and worst) intersections in the City. 10. This department recommends that the applicant be required to prepare a traffic study on this project. - - •:••.-y•••-•si,..1.-VIctir-r- ....:•_•.Y.;•:3..',:;k-z: •..-.!-:•!,„.•. ;,-•:.--,•:,,,N,:-.:•-:::,'... •- --,--:,„...1.,,.....-,::::::.-..;i.,,-,...'.?;;;.-..i.:.....;::f...,-2.-:,,,,.;.--':',.:.':1:.•...i4,-,:i.`....",!..7.7.??7;.'1:::.:...,'Z'''...-i,"..7r,i'.7-:''!".•:';..;..".4'7V-i.l.-'...''. ..:.. . ...'""'''''-'4. • •Ip,.:-..:";, ........;if:;;,.:.1.."....".'iA,`4i......7.4;:!7':;:.2'...-N.,27."‘.-17.7":•.' f'.i. *•".',1,?:::.::::::''2,1':?:..f, .-7:.:.'''.,'S.','•.z.;,',,;4"-.;‘,.:.•".4...F.-i,';',.i.`.c.,.;:M.•.Y.. .t:',1".';.',.''.,:....e4.=,,,....:7;..4 :,':".I.T.';''.--.4.7..''':,"•7';.:%'.77:f- 7-:.S.'•:.•45EX::4-'4.'r,':/f':'-'g • .-:-,7:-,4'..n..'::'I....".''''''-''...,2,..?.!-.:::•7.-f'X''''F.',,_-''-1,',1'.'..-7';.7::•.:-.'..--*•:7-!:.:. r',:te;;;j"77''',;;....,2-ii:"..-F.•:•.'.3 t:l',..'471'..i;,...::...t..-;;;.'.1'.7.:'-:' ,::''-?-,-.1.-:,,‘..17.';',.r.,,6*.,%,':'.J?:.?:-...".'.', :::,......,,,,',......i.....!;C.:1'.., ,;:..'..?";'...:;.:, ,"..:..r;.;::,. ,3-,. ,...,i.. . ....,,;-i".77...tt- .r...li.,:.1. e-l:47.!,7;.-4-7...!..';'i.f.--...,-.!:::.7..el-r'-':2:r! ,.i:- ....1'..I.I., ..,,..;,:. .:..e;;“7.t..." 'il'fiA7:7'i..3..5iir?'`.7.'':-..?i'7,....:.7.7l•''': .1"!= ..'-'•';3•" . ff ,e': :1-1,%;z:...-,•-••!,,:::' ,.".;.. . ..,;,i,i;--- - •••l ''•-'t..r,'-'4:'f'•••‘'Wg-'""').'''ii•:'',---:0.,'i"f'' ''''-'•',•.:If:s'i"'"Zh' -',=.7-7:,'-'-''''*"...,..:2%:F'ir '';',.`-;.r.:-..::-;:i''f'.'1';'•• •:• .:".1?.:''"gI'V-,F.-f;'..?.-';'.:•."1::'•:'')r,:-!!:'7):':i .;;.'...:`:.;.':'•";:,)-;,",:•'' ,.,. -.5.',.:•:•;•;.'r,•--,•34,'0,•;a:;:,,',.i:,7i-....,j'•: ,);,:;;12:-.;•.,?•e-:1;P:',...'1;4:;!;:2•1-Li•-rifif.iart,ift,•1,7:::'',;•rpt451,ih.'''t.,,F•ii-k'fi-,74,,---;. ..%•••,•:•-,,-;,,..•:.2 ..,,:.-.,,,-s.,:•-.F.A.s;•.••;•:-s..,••:--,--;,-,:s,vy,,,•,":14•:' ,.;-•;:s.:,...-:s.-,-v„,.:/•;,,,:•,:•;::ii:-0.1574•....-.-.•-••-:•,,'Y s",...1 :7q,47.-:.•`",rFr.:.•••••-..,:•,,:,,'...,,..t.:A.-.'04)et•Atv. ....,„.,..,.1....,,,,,•••14;,--.•..,-,s.,,„•.-,,,,,,70.1-,.•, ,- -4.e.ipiire.f.‘irt:•,at.,..i...,,,,-?!..,•....w.-,74,,,,°,4, ';'i'..!::i.;,f'=--rr`l.:ti;a'''..'"i''''-'...'"?•-'•••'"• 11;,'AR:7:1.;,lirV.N:Si!•,-:•.2":-•;.:"ik..4Z.g.-t')'fr••4• S.-;41.411'N:',V1i'2•74t";Y•;-•;•=4.:AlkS11..*;4:: (&'•';.4.0,411•--g.",''e,Cilitiolflkft`?"•'::e<;', "•*',•44•' - •ii:.":1,17-4;--,i.1,',7•stil,„-',7 4,•-,-43La---'3 -eS .r;;;•:,,,.•'-.5.c.,,,4.. 4,:s4,,,,,,A:,11,1•;,,gg-V.:-..i•s.:M.;:v.;441,-";i„.;,.;;;:,,i,:.1,-.z.t:Mg.1Z,}.•!..k1":1.71%.1' ).'-'747 ). :1"?...4;:i",t!j'e•,.."i';:•'";:';:,',',...-:-.:1•.:;•i•f;••••,-::',"•.••••")'•/-'%'%.1•4:7•"-'iti-%;:•?• •1.1 .7, '-'.•;;;'•-?•"%;-;:-:•••';'7'•:5.Y.';';':-:•••;•‘•7--':':•'•11`-'7,7;''3:-':1--'1-;74-- -4::',..1--i.=•"-',:''s•T•ftk-''>-1.t'-' i't,.,.'•;.1,•;?;,,ii-,'4.''.:',.2...-4.-.:A:-.4!"..": 4-f;.;•:',i•'..i-'•':- .--:rf.0,',:•.•,,:•" •.;••-!• ••':'•:`•-•-:-„i•;•',--•-',1-..--'...•"`!'-'/':7...c.,f77.71'..i.',..-f •;4",; 7.;777.::"...7:.;.f1;'"'',C'',...'.!gt.v:il'.;:',A,A;-'!i-' '.:.::::'ll, .;').4,..-i ..Z.''.. .:,,i,?_`-.1.-.'''....7:r.,f;•:;•;.'Z'':::,-,::,,i7.•;;..,3:::,Z<Af-,;.7.!,,:l." -.liz-4-,-;:::V-. ':::Z..7'::.:;'-'•-:t•:,;.:-;...:.-•.-..-",-..':.:;':•..1*,`;''..;:T;f:!...','..:. :77....../:::::i;',....-.....,.':74-7•. :t.el7'...';.4.-;77t-7.1":""l::::...7.:.:',';'.7,‘,7.',7?*'•;:'.i,,:":,,.-7.4;'i.;,...,:-';',.!.1'..,-,-c;...!;.&,;-;75.,..'7,..r;•.!.%'.7..r.. .:::.•'%:•••. :',..:.:±,"•.'...;t:•C::...74,it...;'..S.;.;-.-3',:-.,.'...t:t.c:-.;.' ..'''':;f1VI''':.2.:4'.''..1'?.:4:CtX,;., I-:'' ''..:.:...'::.::'•;':.'1?:i V'` ...s: '•'''..7;.'''',I.:'-''.../.i.k.C.t.:'.:.:-'.-'''::::"%-, 3-•\'',.'..1.:....,;.....•.,',.-:"....4";',''...'!°.''',:'.31;17,;•',...:•.'''?:"'...:4-' ;'''...:'0...-:;.;.:,',',...T.,P-W:V,:;'.-. •;"..'r.'.a 1-'1-.,-.•:;"..:-F4."---.;.::: ---•;- --.;.:,-;--,',..7.•,.-.-1-•:•:,'‘.--;•-:,-.:•-•-,:--.:,:•.7- -,f'.•-•.-:;','"1';'-'••:‘,....'-'-:'..e.;-'`•::.;=•:.:,.:i..'1..;,•. -:;.-..••:*.r,:.:''.....-,',''..!-:::t.•:-;,..,:''': -..-5- ,.. .";•.--:::•'fi ;":z:::::: ::,=:. ';'..?"-• :',.:;:,fir'.:.,":"'•',:'-,3,s;r:!•;-.,.."-•-..-'--E;:-.:••.:--r.-::::•--.1, -l:6:-'4•i!:'-i.-:-;.-5-:....4.-. ..:i:-;:.z:1:--::•-•'4,Tr,".Ti:.:' :••',..!-Z.-:'••.:•;•..;*"..:::::',Y,•!„..,"'.11--!,„._'.'••••;,T.7'.., .';',;;:-??..f•••",..',•;:-...:•••-•-:',..;:.,:-••••:--;.!..,;:-',,';':Z:i....i'f'::-."..-:':!.'",';'!".).-:'',......:.r:..5;'......`'''',-.:7'..1:;-•: ::-;.•::". ..-4.'4;r,;:.'v,'`.;•‘'I'lv.v 4-.',..,=v4i-v-.:-;,;)'','.:.-'::,?:.;:. :,, -.:7--e7i';'!•‘,i--,-1.,. .--;..----.fr-4'.',:11-2,1--;',--,',---:F:iv-r.I;:!-'''',`5;v'bt.-1-.• :-- :''.'-' ,,,,,,,•,q,,,--,,,,,,-,1,7F-,,:,44,-..r.i,z,...':i-P.-'.'...-Z;::vv;?-v.v•-''''VZ-..vy-v''.,;-;--.:',.'---:!-'';F-,'''''''-' -s:''-v-':....%.'t'.''',:''.,..''.-::---:, -'..;''v-v::'''•••'%:.--.....4',.:.-z;;,•-•,-,_'-':-',.?,.,..'::,:,,,;:,-,!.•,';:v,,,:rviv,,f-,''...'•••::'',;f`,‘,: :,:, -‘-...;•1:::':;4,1;:,!.. ''.•:‘,..;...:..';',',''..-.,:;-5-':','...,.-v.-:v,', -:.";: v.-- ':. -‘-'.'',:••v':---24--::':;.v.:'-r-v--:>'-2.:,'v'vv.:'----.'::'-';'-:.':',.-.-:-'''-,-,::---,,-,'',: .','.'''.'.'!.:-,:•',,'-.-....::':-:'..:-;---,,,:',....:.',i:Y.-.•,...-7-.....':. ,.`",?2,,,;:'''.'.;,-•?"1.v.'.'''..-..-',;:' ..--:,'•21:;-;evv,v.:4::-'4,‘e-.-:-;-'-'',„:'.;A-,-:•:''-'..;,',4::,;.-''2..:-_;-,;-_-::: :-4:::::-.:','-•:--''..'-.S.-: '.'.'-',-. --_ ....,:-.--1-1,v ...?..-:;''.` ../,-. .;--' -":... . ...'''..14-,:,,I: .'-'' -,,-'-..:v'4,:-''..;.".....'''..!..?:-.'--.V...vv;'v '"...':'-'--''--.'•;c?. ':'-'-'"I--;:--:v ''.--,'.. 7..:,;-;..--...,..,,,v-,.'.v,:...''•:2,:'`..':,.:"f'-':'.v,;-..*::.1.-•-'-'''.'-;-;',1 '„ -!. ',: v'v, `v• ?..; ..^: . "---:.- ..''vcVvf.^-`..:'::-. .,'-'; -:.•-•'.t.,7',':',:v•-r.'.-i...‘:.-'....--v..4:Y,-.A.t.''..:-"-,Tiv,'''..v A' 2L.-.1.v;!:.:.':-;•-•;:.:.;'-'7,:-.;',?:-.--.-.•E'-;,.::;.i-:;"!....0 :: ',.- .:-.':.;:•::-.::-''.;----•••'' '...v.'.'vev:,,:v,.::.:.'`.',.. .::;'--.-l':':-i:--.....:'...'"-:'.-;f.-•:,. ....r.::',..,-_,_,.,-.i•:-.,<;',.--:.-,-_!,,..',.-!...: `.,-:'..,•,.-.',..,'::-2 7.; '7.'...,: '7,71.,..":.:..„;:,'.7,......:-..'.."7.'7.7..'::::'''.7.,*-:.:;:,a':- :'' .1,,',c:-i',::::::,4-2:, ,j.-1,fk-,.!:.:-::::'i•:...,...'3:;•-.'-.4`•:-'•?7-%'=,-':=;-.'::;v.':-•'',:' vil:'I''-v%',,,,:::...:•-:.' ;--,',.-:::-,-,...,.:::..::-,k:--`,,.-::-;_v.:.-f-v-lv.,.',:::':-.,,' :'-,':;-,, •••• 4.,;*:-:--:•;.`•••:1,':,-•',....:..-'---.-f.*.v,v.,,.:-'iv'',;-..--:`.:.,....;-2:-`,--tV,, :.-,•;:",!-;••.:;.:!••:-..7 ..::!;:.,',:-.::‘,.,:''....::':":','±':-z'-,-;4_,,, .,.'''.1.'•i-•'-'f.;':•.'21.-c:±•-•••-.1'v'-'.:.•;:•:.,..:"...'•":•::".:-.'-1'.;',i- ';•••-••••'.::,-:- .-.'fr; •••••:.:""•1;.3.•::::v.v,v-,>•,----.Z.,,-v,'.:--'..,"::::•.:-..-%.t.....---:'.'.-''"'-''''''v.; -.'':',,:-,.._:.•:, ,...;:,,,<-,1,..-.".:....',...-........;.....,-.:‘'.....,,-;-::,..,•....:;.-7-:',--;%--:1-.........';':.,''...i..i.f..-',,.......t-'''::',.-.:‘,.',.,-•:.;':'''..;i 4.':-.•-,:;'::..v.''..:.::::::,-;'..:-1:-.:'':-.,,;.-fv--;,,,.,-1, :::: .; ',---,:-..5•::.,::,f:::-';..',-I.,,-.:',:-:'';-:-,'•v•",--,:!.---.1,:.,...--,:"'_-'.•:' •••:---.?'' ...,-;: ..'.'".; .'''"--,Y";7‘..:,;,..'-'..,•::.'-:7'.;T::;-,:-''-''',':n.,•:':'•"-f.',"-s:t"'-•,'•i•7.••••-•'•''...::'[...:'•7'.',i'..')•.‘,...'.'"i•I''.:..7.:-'',;.••-1.,:,‘.....1.'":"..,:i:'''...'7'.:'''."..:Ailir.•::'...7.',4.;.••• •:'... i.L".',...:....4:'','. L''..4%.1,:;Y'l.:.,••-..... ''.'. ' •;:'..7-7,----.'?..--'•••••.'l'.."-:••'.'. — '...;.•',-E,'.:',.•1"..:',.:7.1.•'•.:;`7''''.'7.."'..i 4-l:'.-;..'',..:,:-.7.:‘;.'...'','-'.,2';'.:=.-!'-''7.2'7-...''......7""';',Z''.."'1.:.'7;.''''''.'211'''.:7'''''''..7" •''71,7•2:2•.':'...;'t-ir.`-''.'17:7;—:.,L.-.7'.!.'''...7.-CP;':.7-2. 'i'L:::'7,:`.....7;:-''.:7::::.-:".''''':.•':.''.'I''.'''..':-7sl:''',-1::•-••'7"-'':7.,.''•....7.-••7.-.':-.'5;"--"--'•••—•'1',.--., ; .'-• ':. ..,- -,,... : ;• ,..:•,.,-;„•-•.,:;.;: :,...,..•,-;;.;..,-•-.-. -....-..::.••,••,:, :•.;i:.•.-•••••‘..,...,••.;:,::.,f:.:t.•::-•-...;,•,-.•!..-',,..z•,..:••.•'•-•,....- .•-•;-::::-.-.•.-',-.:.•-.•:.,:,.•.:,•••••:;.1:':...:-::•,-7.1-,-.....-.:;•!...",:-:•'-..;,.-•.-5---.•,.f''',•',";,'•- '.,-:.---..:.1... ,-.-:::,.,..:. .-•• , „•';'-'•.;:..---",:.:....;,.."-.,;•...:,-' '..•-','-::::::‘:::.-'••' •1•:•' ''..•!''-'-f.',.~..".....'':''''' '''......-,,'i-:-..-,a•-7-':.:.•:' •;:•:-.:',.•••••'......:,'',,,.c,:::;:•••.5..,;•••:•-''.'•-•........:..,:..-............s:,=,•::..-.,-;.....-,.:.:,••-....',..4.,.:.,17.-.. -•:,.1.•,;:,:7=--.7-.;-4•---::::•••••.C.2 .:'•••••::':.•.:,;-;.-'...-f-'i.:-•'•,‘".r:.--"'",-,.::•',".'-.:7"--7:.'"':'!:'' ..7,,7....'.?:..:7'.'•!•.77::"..."::"..::',..•'.:;":',.:.‘....,--...-7.:.;..:.'...:.-,',..,'.••.. ":.,"17-.::.7...?.:: :',:.'''.-.;.,:•:::.1'%.!:t‘..'. -;:k.;'"...,f.....'''s...,.7 ;.:•:,.,:::: '::,..-,:..;',:... .;.`-.%...:;'.7:: ••;,:•`Y,',i .;,:g,:,...7.-...';':',:. ..,..•777 -...; ,../.,,.21.-"..7:7!:-•.'.. ,.,...,;:,:7.:,..7::-'':':,i'....:,:''''......:.f.A.7'7.-7.f:,!7,-5:::7:1;7;•,- :.::....:...:.:...:-..._-. ....',...'::.:,,',....,-,3.''".;.-vi;,-;',-:,-.;,..;..'-'• ',.',:-., •'.....:.?.',.'.,'.%.,:;,`. .1,..2.,,-;-,,..-.::'....-:;.;."......*:;:;',;'.,.',->1:.;‘:,',,,7::::'±!-,r;-''::: .;:f:,7..,--.:'....,:f is'.......'.:,'.7.',i.:4',::;-; -'--e,...'6.;'',...:1:‘v:4!..'-:.7:: ' .::;1•.?-''' ? 41-.--- -.r' ,,:-- - '-;..:.:..,:,:,',,,:,•..-2-;.,-;;-:':.'....;,1`....•....7.tv..;.i.-.-....'4::.,....'.;""I''..?:i''' .'.::'''',. '..'.7''''''.'-'''''',..;..7'....:...A,•72.-, .tL;;,..;'1;-..i..;.-:.%':,,I71,...4_"..i.',"7;i':..:''',.:.7-...:.7',../.=:,:.!,-.:-........';''..';':::;`:7.7,,s1;1:‘::'4:' ,....:.:7:;:...:.t:-..1.2.:'-t;;;''ft,;:_,:-:.4‘,1..',7-Et::i.Z.;;',74.l.i':•;7.7,L77.2,11p.:fEel'1•:;..W.:';247". k...../. -.:.;:',:.'z%,':);.:•*;;.:::-:-..:.i‘e-;;;;: ;',:ii.;7:.-:‘75.1;-!.;':;.;.:.:7i.,;!,,.:„..,"::I'."1,.;;,..'.-77'.4...e.`...;.:',..:•%;:7A4-..,:cit;s:i-'''' ''7.P.;;''sPt-'iZtC" I'll''''''•:.i.'7,;7.1:dI;;;;Ii7.?...'.44f.t:;•.7'7'; '.1'.-':'-'.';:,'7 •P'..'";'7,:ii' ll77;';,";,..‘:5Wi'`-4',4i.;471.....-eA'-'4ts4.;.&-'1*4,.Nr.i.7:-,;11:::.V.dK i.::,:::13';47,,,,. ..,Itte.,,,.7,4%,;,.;7*:'14F0,1g.:13..,:;i:.41.:'ci,i7isikklit,'1,4I;e0/1:4;ft•?&5'i.;:,iell.`?;71g0,-VgZe't41,,Ck?:71:3',!;',5P',V1t.,'fV':',;*_ 7;,g;.E.,fgcC.I',Iri'.',:',r.;';'._..,i,lf.f.&'771.7',7•;;.`i7:.';1477,V..1.:.: !_:.„21.4ni`4.-.7,47.4.-:1 i';',:..V.V.1-'7..",F1';'',.:1:1:.7...,":lrf:',4.....','"'.•6X..-;:',...'/...•,k?,n7?;-/.'2.....;',....T....7 ,;?..,',--.:,..:::'''.', ....-;..;',..:.,:.:.......-l;:i',..- ,4:::,..:::-..:',...1-',,7,.'ii::',-;-,-,.,._.sr"i„:',,;,..:-.1k.;y4.,!....„....,:::.-;.,?:-:.,,:„...,..,..T.,.....;'''...•,., .4.-.?_-"i,,,::'.--:.':'.'.";.,,,'5.7.-,',....-,,,,r.t......--.• - --, •. - . . N.fa "----- :7:. .3,s•s, „..,:s•-„,--•:, 57.--- 7 .•-1---dtle... :,2 i -- • ,, '<„_,,,,!/...-- %-."---,,------- ,r-1 ---- / i ...''.a ... --...„ ,./`,4/ / ‘ % r.6 1 ••• \ P-Y "/ / /1 - s :I f,'4—e"'''''-' , ,,,,..-1 y's•-•?'--'`---'" . / /' .. -.s.,. • -1 '•'4 ... a _,..----` ..t 0, 1 r. '(I •S• "(.*); ..„.) '-•••.P.,,....,. • 11 \ t i• ///- /\ I ! , • a tA •,A1-!-g• ?''..._. /01it7.i. . I; a - Tr---it,&, 4 --.., 0-44 „r.r-• 4.1 W 2" 1 qii g'4^v,',:t!'" .1 ' 1 •,. ., '‘. .1 ' 1 `,, !'(--.,;,\„9''- ,'. ' -.1„-. :,, .6! =•••• l• lt6 ! 'Li. ''/ •-,,'• ,' r,,,,,I.,! ,. / , ,,, , .., , ,,, , , - .,,,,,,, • ,,,, ..,...,,, ,,,.. ,.... ,,./ ..„, .,„ e.,, .,... \ ,,, ,/,,,,,.s.•1 , q. ,, , /• , 4 . vs t.t4 v.t •v i) ' •4iv" a..1. ,,,,t• ...•,ft,^ i , .. ,,CT\.:... „/ ...z\/. '.. if i . :' „.,,,, ,),..0' .../..//•4, \•.),1 ,\,s.,\:, ,."/,, ./...‘,. i• fl ,,?..4 :/,..'/•-'4!' ''''. \.\\>>/' \ \ , 4i , ,‘",!t;',', I; ii;1 ,....4i , ,,,,,,,,,,,..;,....›,•:-....:<,\ ‘.1‘,,,, ;t,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,),, )! 4, ,,,-, ;hi, .t. •/- 7'.1,:l• ' - [.., - „,• : 0. --, .,..,/,-. ..-•,‘ \ - •. 7 ,,,,P „ -'''' •••• • 'IV/ ';'!.\--„... -.-.. .• ' ,.,,- ...,,,, . •,, .• I 4" 0 .! X-. /'•• %.'" - .• 3;11 -- .,'-;'' ,. N .;),,, . , -,-- ii 07, 4-,„...,\,.....,: ,--4,,,, ,.. 1;"•\ e ,. - . 4%'... `,./ ,, v' ' c"•\.‘ ... \\,„ if:„.4.*',t,1, 0\ //'i.ii .(z", \\\•,....,. .., ‘ 6.":1-' ,‘,t,,:,. e'.. ‘..1‘. • ;,s,',‘,,,.. ''\,\Ik,,,,,. \ :\C,,,',:filt.c.,, , /::(I,''' !I ,,,,,!; :,\;1;<':,'-‘-<c,'‘‘.\:,': , ,,: 4'X.' ,.. ‘4"›,•c!!.,(y‘'. 's:1 ,le'c\ \ •••.- \ 4.../, ,-• , 041 .\44. '°. \ '' ' ... .,.•<••S,\ 4..\\.,.,„.„..„..' .s. .;),/<:,..t,,:); /".,,, ', '454i1 II: A eb 4C.• .L? V \ \ \''. \‘'SV411' '--•''-''''';''':'''''''.2.,,,..P \\*:>.. ' •''',2•C''‘'''..:/' , Ai6;I') ' \ •\.\\ v. •\\t. 11,11t.,•-?•::!:t<•• \..i:-,, .-ts'X' 'i P I I \ ,\ \ , ,.4, A.., ..... ' \ ,44,TC:.,ft,.'./1-': .\ :,^.•.,, '''//' 4 1 I '.., • .,..,. .k...... , /,. ,/ I (4 ''. 1.'' A i li; lie 4 • \\,.,s.'''',• ( ;,.., / \,•• 7.•••• '.4 .• 4`li. X \ 4 ti* \ , N'' . :// ',' .,,, A/ ,k i'. • l',.•\ ‘>‹,, ,V'''' .' .41 t \ 'cs , ,A..,•)-(p‘\ #1,frr <0,$)": I \ \ `,.....' `, • , ' '• \'\7'''' sn .1- i•t ps ;• (.; \\` N• 14" \\ 7/e. ‘‘`., ‘ ,•-4Pdi .- •)•/11•-1‘,; 101,Milr.•,.,41 , (0. \ ., \N \\' ..1.,,.., \ ' 4. , \-.4.y):,,,,,., •',.• ',‘ \‘'Cle:'''' \' • \,, '''' J. ,-,4 •• ,i ,, „,.,s.; •• i 1;Irl! [a'. 'l ii, >‘ . % -.:,./, ‘, • .)::,-17r, ;.), <,,,. vr•i?.. .. , ,;.,,....• •i ' (-T-‘,‘... ,t,, ''.t. .,. .::.i;i k'i.; "-.0 ',A \ s,Viz, ',''•', ; '•.,t[ilz ,3...11 v<< \ \\"\\ '‘'..•••'.' s'` ',.\,, ,••. ... 1 fl'a 0 33 t: I p•' -c.p.,:.1 :In:ss,4 it • ,4;••,,. A • e P• t, 4 r•t fil i \\t •,, \‘`,\\ \\N. .-‘,„,/,::'1 ).. i il; ?! \ '(/,',' • , t: 1 ••••?., ‘4.. \ r.G•r‘•1 c • \ k; 4 ? i IA•Is 1., .;.ti S•.‘ :,, 'di:A \':', \ 4 s .X.,, „-. i'i• ‘-;i•,!. % — n "ii " (t 4 4 , F ,i ) \ \121.7.41. • / \ , \ , . -. . . , . .• .. .... /mt No. MA A IN J-•• 0e" Paw lawl , . . . 12 AMPLAS NIACTUP PLAN ...Iili.... ge gi s:Ta ,c?. ...AH 7 DE111 SHARE PROPERTY Drown. 1:12_,31 L i tiV IMAISWAY Myeloid. WARREN LAPON WI All111 VALI, '---"` A.. 0 H HP ITECT INNJN,WAPHINPN./N " ' -• " . ..R. . . . ... . ADDENDUM TO ERC REPORT RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87, ECF-049-87 ANALYSIS: The subject 5. 696 acre stepped, triangular site between the on-ramp to I-405 and Maple Valley Highway is proposed to be developed with three buildings, a restaurant (3,900 s. f. ) and a 115 room hotel in the first phase, and a 40, 000 sq. ft. office in a later phase. The subject site is zoned B-1 and shown as commercial on the Comprehensive Plan. All the uses are permitted under the B1 zoning. The eastern boundary of the site is characterized by a steep, treed slope that raises up to the Monterery Terrace Subdivision. The slope is shown on the Comprehensive Plan as greenbelt. The subject application must go through site plan review before the Hearing Examiner because of its size. A number of potential environmental impacts have been identified including: probable increased traffic impacts on SR-169, particularly during peak AM periods when hotel users would be leaving the site; vehicular/pedestrian conflicts • both through the site as well as from the site to the City's nearby park and trail system which could attract youngsters as well as adults; and surface water runoff. Because of the site's elevation relative to I-405 and setback, freeway generated noise was not considered to be a major impact. Staff have been working with the applicant to get them to do a coordinated site plan for the whole site rather than • subdividing it first and developing it as three, uncoordinated sites. These discussions have focused on developing a system of internal pedestrian walkways between buildings, the development of a through site pathway system to facilitate the movement of people off the residential plateau to the northeast to the Cedar River Park complex to the south, and a coordinated landscape and thematic design for the site. The applicant was encouraged to apply earlier for site plan revieew and it had been hoped that the proposed preliminary site plan review procedures would have been in place. Because of internal delays these unfortunately are not yet available. Specific mitigation measures are listed below: RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a determination of non-significance mitigated for the proposed 5. 696 acre site with the following conditions: 1. A system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the campus be provided. 2. That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include a pedestrian pathway along western edge of the site or on the eastern edge of the site in - r Addendum to ERC Report - Ramac, Inc. , SA-054-87, ECF- 049-87 - page 2 the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. 3 . The hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 50 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 4. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 5. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 on-ramp 1 traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6,300. 00. 6. That the applicant provide a detailed traffic impact analysis to identify additional traffic mitigation measures. 7. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant) from upland properties, the applicant is advised to provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting as well as canopy trees around the parking areas. The measures should be worked out with the Building and Zoning Department. • Z.ov1,r1 OF I 4 o$ z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR tea 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 -o 43- O•9,4, SEPZEtlte BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 20, .1987 TO: REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS FROM: BUILDING AND ZONING 'DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 -' THIS MATERIAL WAS OMITTED FROM THE ROUTING FOLDERS a PLEASE ADD AND REVIEW. b54-.67 C .R. (BOB) PARROTT, P.E. Consulting CIA!, Traffic and Transportation Engineering March 26, 1987 • CITY OF RENTON Environmental Review Committee Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SELF-SERVICE STORAGE/OFFICE/RESTAURANT/HOTEL COMPLEX Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to supplement data submitted to the City of Renton dated October 28, 1985, concerning traffic . generation and turning movements relative to the office and self-service storage complex. ' Neglecting the self-service storage facility, the developer originally anticipated constructing a 60,000 square foot office complex which, according to ITE trip generation data, would yield the following traffic demand volumes:. A.M. Peak Hour In 112 A.M. Peak Hour Out 21 P.M. Peak Hour In 16 P.M. Peak Hour Out 82 The new proposed development involves 40,000 square feet of office space, 3,900 square feet of restaurant, and a 115-room hotel complex. According to ITE trip generation rates, as published in Land Use Codes 310, 710, and 832, copies of which are attached hereto, the anticipated generated vehicular trip ends from the proposed new land use are as follows: A.M. Peak Hour In 273 A.M. Peak Hour Out 100 • . • P.M. Peak Hour In 91 P.M. Peak Hour Out 113 • 1029 Market Street Building•Suite A•Kirkland,Washington 98033.Office:(206)828-4266,Kirkland•Home:(206)488-9460,Bothell I'f Na • City of Renton Page 2 0 It is obvious from the ITE trip generation rates that the new proposal will generate and attract more traffic than the proposed office complex referenced in the October 28, 1985 report. The developer at this time has completed the channelization improvements required along the Maple Valley highway relative to ingress and egress to the proposed complex. Level of service calculations result in what appears to be a level of service for ingress and egress movements to the proposed complex off of the Maple Valley highway, no matter what 1 is developed, because of existing traffic volumes on the Maple Valley highway. Again, referring to the October 28, 1985 report, adoption of the now-constructed channelization improvements on the Maple Valley highway, and the proposed right-turn in and right-turn out only conditions from the complex onto Northeast Third Street will tend to minimize any adverse impacts on both arterial roadways. We believe that construction of the proposed project, incorporating traffic considerations contained herein and in the referenced report of October 28, 1985, will result in no . significant impact to existing traffic characteristics on the adjacent arterial streets and highways. If you have any questions or desire any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. • Yours truly, . . ..44,219514' G. R. Parrott, P.E. /dr . Attachment • C ,1, • SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Hotel ITE Land Use Code 310 Independent Variable—Trips per Room Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 10.5 13.4 9.1 5 191 Peak A.M. Enter 0.58 2 475 Hour Between Exit 0.29 - _2—._ 475 of - 7 and 9 Total 0.85 1.18 0.-61 6 snn Adjacent P.M. Enter 0.36 2 475 Street Between Exit 0.37 2 475 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0.73 1.Q4 0,47 7 76q Peak A.M. Enter Hour v Exit of Total 0.90 6 234 Generator P.M. Enter Exit i - _ Total 0187 - — - _ q -- 24 5- Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 8.1 11.8 5.8 4 234 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0.67 1.34 0.37 4 234 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends s A 13 2 5.4 - 4 • 198 Peak Enter r- Hour of Exit Generator Total 0.61 1.06 0.42 3 182 Source Numbers 4, c, 17, 13, SS, 72 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975 , I 1 • \ c . • ? SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES jJ N0 Land Use/Building Type _0._e��.]. Office Building ITE Land Use Code 710 Independent Variable—Trips per 1,000 Gross Square Feet I:'4 1f' E' Average , Number Average Size of a Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study i Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 12. 30 43.5 1.6 35 231 Peak A.M. Enter 1.86 3. 3 1. 3 8 210 Hour Between Exit 0. 35 1.o 0. 1 8 210 of 7 and 9 Total 2. 32 5.9 1.2 25 150 iAdjacent P.M. Enter e I __ Street Between Exit 1.36 2,6 0.7 125 ,11 1111111 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 2.20 6.4 0.8 ]22 !), _. Peak A.M. Enter 1. 86 3. 3 1.3 8 210 dour Exit 0.35 1.0 0. 1 8 _ 210 of Total 2-32 5-9 1 .2 25 150 Generator P.M. Enter -27 0.7 n- 1 4 125 Exit 1 -36 2.6 0-7 4 1 25 -- — Total— _. - - Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 3 3u g 9 1 0 81 Peak Enter _ Q ag o 2 O.,' 88 • Hour of Exit 0 16 0.2 0 1 11 R$. Generator Total ___ .... Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends . Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers 2, 5, 19, 20, 21, 51� 53 54, 72, 88, 89, 92. 95. 97 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates • Date: . i975, Rev. 1979 ' SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type nigh Turnover, Sit-Down Restaurant ITE Land Use Code -_832 Independent Variable-Trips per 1,000 Square Feet Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate - Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 164.4 551.2 47.9 9 9,7 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Between Exit I? , of 7 and 9 Total* 47.5 63.5 24.0 7 ' 71 Adjacent P.M. Enter 9.9 17.3 7.6 3 1 1_? Street Between Exit 4.0 . 10.3 3.2 3 11 7 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 10,5 38_7 34/ 1-1.-. .. . 8.3 . Peak A.M. _ Enter 10.1 11.9 6.6 4 9 6 Hour Between - Exit 5:5 20.R . 7.'_"-4 4 9.6 of 12-1 P.M. Total , 15.7 _ 75.0 S_1 19 7_2 Generator P.M. Enter _13.0 17_R 11 7 3 8.2 - Between Exit 9.2 21 _7 6 R - 3 8.2 6 and 7 - Total - -22,2 - -39.0 - 18.0 • - 3 - 8.2 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 67.8 105.2 62.4 2 9.7 Peak Enter • Hour of Exit • Generator Total 10.0 13.2 7.0 6 10.9 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 39.0 40.0 32.4 2 9.7• Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 6.9 8.8 4.6 6 - 10.9 ' Source Numbers 2, 4, 5, 72 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6--Trip Generation Rates - Date: July 197; _ *Represents two restaurants which apparently cater to breakfast patrons. , • • fi I' i' .. r kV.IC. kDuo) rrruz�‘../r I. r.tc, .. Consc:;ing Civil, Traffic and Transportatiotti :gineering J . • • _ I t 1 October 28, 1985 F i 1 City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 r SUBJECT: Ramac, Inc. Self-Service Storage/Office Complex Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to supplement data submitted to the • f. City of Renton dated 12/22/82 concerning traffic generation and turning movements relative to the proposed office complex, and data submitted 1/3/83 regarding left turn storage lane — requirements on the Maple Valley Highway into the proposed site. Copies of this data are attached hereto. • Vehicle trip generation data utilized in this analysis was derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, published in 1983, specifically for ITE Land Use Code 710 for General Office Buildings and Land Use Code 151 for Mini-Warehouses. Copies of these published rates are also attached hereto. Discussions were held with staff members of the City of Renton and W. S. .DOT in order to determine existing and projected traffic volumes on both the Maple Valley Highway and N. E. Third Street. Existing average daily traffic volumes on N. E. Third 1029 Markel Street Building•Suite A•Kirkland,Washington 98033.Wilco:(206)828-4266,Kirkland•Home:(206)488-9460.Bothell:'.1 • City of Renton -2- October 28, 1985 Street amount to about 32,000 vehicles a day, with 15,300 being eastbound and 16,700 being westbound. Existing average daily traffic volumes on the Maple Valley Highway amount to around 23,300, with approximately 11,800 westbound and 11/500 eastbound. Generated vehicular trip-ends from the proposed sites are as follows: A. Mini-warehouse site (Land Use Code 151) . Average daily trip-ends = 86 A.M. peak hour trip-ends = 5 P.M. peak hour trip-ends = 9 B. Proposed office building A.M. peak hour trip-ends = 112 trips in; 21 trips out P.M. peak hour trip-ends = 16 trips in; 82 trips out It is obvious from the ITE Trip Generation data and observations make by the author, for mini-warehouse installations, throughout the Seattle metropolitian area that the impact from such installations and projects can be considered neglible. Traffic volume activity in relation to mini-warehouse installations occurs before or after peak hour volumes or occurs on weekends. From a traffic engineering standpoint, the traffic volume impacts are therefore centered around the proposed office complex. Capacity calculations have been performed and have resulted in City of Renton -3- October 28, 1985 what appears to be a level of service "E" for ingress and egress to the proposed office complex off of the Maple Valley Highway, assuming no other access is allowed. Capacity calculation forms are attached hereto. It is proposed that access onto N. E. Third Street be restricted to a right turn in and right turn out only operation from the proposed site. Existing traffic volumes on N. E. Third Street, during the peak hours, definitely preclude any other turning movements taking place. Full access from the Maple Valley Highway, plus right in and right out only from N. E.. Third Street will allow the office building-and storage- facility patrons -access to and from the- proposed site without having to cross heavy, peak hour traffic volumes. The self-service storage facility, by its very nature, will be secure and as such, the driveway around the periphery of this site can also be secured, thus preventing short-cutting of traffic from Maple Valley Highway to N. E. Third Street and vice versa. The proposed scheme would allow eastbound vehicles desiring to enter the site from the Renton area, to utilize N. . E..Third Street and turn right into the site, thus avoiding any turning conflicts, with major traffic volumes westbound towards the Renton area on . the Maple Valley Highway. Likewise, westbound traffic from the ti City of Renton -4- October 28, 1985 Maple Valley area, destined to the proposed site, would turn freely from the Maple Valley Highway right into the site. During the P.M.- peak hours the reverse would be true, eastbound traffic would turn right out of the site onto N. E. Third Street and meld with the existing traffic volumes eastbound. Westbound traffic could turn right onto the Maple Valley Highway from the site and meld with the minor traffic volumes heading towards the Renton area. In summary, it is recommended that right turn in, and right turn out only, be facilitated along N. E. Third Street, subject to security conditions such that only the office building and warehouse patrons are accommodated and short-cutting from N. E. Third Street to Maple Valley Highway or vice versa by the general public is prevented. This will result in a higher level of service at the entranceway from the Maple Valley Highway and likewise should not jeopardize the existing level of service along N. E. Third Street. Left turn lane storage facility calculations from the Maple Valley Highway into the proposed site as submitted 1/3//83 appear to be adequate. Left turn storage facilities under the proposed concept from N. E. Third onto the site will not be required since we propose a right turn in and right turn out only concept. t T 74 ' City of Renton -5- October 28, 1985 4� Construction of the proposed project, incorporating the traffic 5 routing considerations contained herein will result in no significant impact to existing traffic characteristics on the s. adjacent arterial streets and highways. � g y 4 If you have any questions or desire any additional information, Aplease do not hesitate to call me. 4 Yours truly, t G. R. (Bob) Parrott, P. E. /ac Attachments • r. „eV; _, w SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES 1, 1 Land Use/Building Type Mi n t-.WaretintiRe ITE Land Use Code 151 — a; Independent Variable—Trips per _140^^_oss q eet of luuilding-Area • Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study y Average WeeDtdab Vehicle Trip Ends 2.8 4 .4 1,7 6 61 _7 Peak A.M. Enter vHour Between Exit of 7 and 9 Total . 0. 17 0.27 0.06 6 61 .7 Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0.2Q SOP 0.18 6 Al _ 7 Peak A.M. Enter i Hour Exit --” t of Total n_26 6,44 . n. 19 6 61:7 Generator P.R . Enter Exit . z Total 0. .. _.2 Q_.,_ _._.0 . q. • 6 61.;7.... i SaturdayVehicle Enda6 61 .7 • Trip 2.5 �a� _, 1.7 • . Peak Enter 1 Hour of Exit . Generator Total 9.40 0.60 p.2 , 1 Sunday Vehicle Trip Enda , 1.7 .2. 8 1 .1 6 . 61 .7 •Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total n_3n n_61 n_19 A , 61 7 Source Numbers ill . ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1982 • . y.P SUaMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RITES Land Use/Building Type General Office Building ITE Land Use Code 710 Independent Variable-Trips per 10000 Gross Square Feet Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 12 . 10 43.5 3.6 35 211 Peak A.M.- Enter 1. 86 3.1 1. 3 8 210 Hour Between Exit 0 . 35 1.0 0.1 8 210 of 7 and 9 Total 2. 3 2 5.9 1. 2 2.5 _ 150 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0.27 0. 7 0. 1 4 125 Street Between Exit 1 . 36 2.6 0.7 4 125 Traffic 4 and 6Total _ .. T _. z2----?0 Tom.4 0_ g� _ a4` _. .1.22._ _"". Peak A.M. Enter 1.86 3. 3 1. 3 8 210 Hour Exit 0_R5 1.0 0.1 8 210 of Total 2-32 5 .9 1 .2 - - 25 15n Generator P.M. - Enter n-27 n_7 0. 1 4 , 125 Exit 1 _36 2_6 n_7 4 125 Total _.. _.2 _2Q 6_ 4. . .. 0_ L _. . . .24. 122 __ . . Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 3. 3 U 8 9 1 0 13 81 Peak Enter 0. 19 0. 2 _ 0. 1 2 88 Hour of Exit 0 16 0 7 _ 0-1 2 RR Generator Total n -5n 2 2 n 2 13 A i Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total • I - Source Numbers _?, 5, 19, 20, 21, 510 53, 511, 72, 88, 89, 92, 95, 97 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975. Rev. 1979 SUMMARY ©F TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office Building ITE Land Use Code 17 0 Independent Variable Trips per Employee • Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study •Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 3.59 11. 21 2.42 18 446 Peak A.M. Enter r ! , 4 t- ! 2 284 Hour Between Exit 0.06 0.11 0.05 3 284 of 7 and 9 Total 0.59 1.43 0. 36 18 446 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0.08 0. 10 0.02 3 284 Street Between Exit 0.24 0.37 0.23 3 284 Traffic — 4 and 6 .- Total J8_ . v ..."_447 Peak A.M. Enter 0.3,5 0.40 0.27 3 284. Hour Exit o.n6 n_11 0_n5 3 284 of Total n_5 9 1 .43 n. 36 1 R 446 Generator - P.M. — Enter 8 n_ 1 n n,n a -3 -2 8 u Exit n_24 n_ 37 n_23 3 2R4 Total n 1..79 2.7.._ Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends , 0 81 2 R6 n- 30 13 336 Peak Enter Hour of Exit , Generator Total 0.21 0.71 0.04 11 116 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter • Hour of Exit Generator Total • Source Numbers 19, 2n, 88, 89, 92, 95. 97 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975. Rev. 197_9 • '1ti VP!' • SUMMARY OF T OP GE0iERATOON RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office Building 1TE Land Use Code 710 independent Variable—Trips per Acre • Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies VariablelStudy Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 2110. 1 29907 ' 51 20 7-9 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Between Exit of 7 and 9 Total 19 ,2 . 86 9 14 9-2 Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit •Traffic 4 and 6 Total 18-0 ,81 8 1 . 9:3 Peak A.M. Enter Hour . Exit of Total - Generator - P.M. -- -Enter - - -_ -- - --- - Exit • Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit I Generator Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends . Peak Enter ' Hour of Exit • Generator Total Source Numbers 19, 88, 89, 92 ' ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates - - . Dater 1979 . . 4 . , .131.TLIS thUtIST CO ItiliATIUM . • MERCER ISLAND SALtz urFICE ..., ; 0 •P.O.BOX NO•MERCER ISLAND,WASIIINOTON 98040 I A/C 208/232-8819 RAY FIEDLER , 1 , . , . , . . . . • ' atoz. Pitz/vettoy. 772,41 AFik. isiut)iY 1 i • : 1 1 .H4pe •1647,16, yivialva,,oce I . 1 1 i i i ; i . i_._ I • , . i . . , 1 ' t• stiff], • . I 1 • ! , . . •... ,e So ! ; ', 46.s.. 1......_____1 • 00/1•0116 6/205,S" A se i I 0 oeo crF: . Architects anaillEinners • . Si 624561 ier4r.,4 I 1 ).1 a :, i zego wit iv.' 1 Six /4062. : ' Ath, OF eNict0Y -aS i • I i I , : sUctrier Island.Wkstshingtim 9040 .: (206)232-5990 1 . I . ! 1 , . 1 ; 1 . . 1 , 1 : 1 • " • vetott. oo EtioiN6 i : : i -•-, - : • i • • - ! ! I ! • . • , • t : Bodo&f 6 opE44. 60x& !: 1:r_ 7se-. Apr. ' : 5nz maelic i Aoax 2:40,/ = 759. ,107 ytilovi6E effrzo. . ... , . . EAPROVES ! 25-55e 3.57 = 9/5- ADZ" i : ' 1 • . . 125 GtCRST a4c5e 9i AL7 AsSaqa• 55Z Rypraig-Rairon &Some 46-K9 wfr a f Al NiPte frAitcy zfr-rx.oe : A.M. Meitt ritITOR. c 90fig• .55,11 =6-4/06. $.714 1-ii=7 70/2445 ajar -g. #0///i, 15% 27/ . __._ •___ • • • i t • 41 : si s . it frAg LT 72ea #R, • vrAcik g /AI MO 441E e • -,. _,• 220 0, 2.220, - • ________ flige.......... ••••70 . . " . " Mt Vette)/ 111/6#1444>i 1• • gad? • . • 14D7: IA)/990 a 247sb 4571 ar HANNAY IDE-Pi. .. .. ny _ .:.... .:....___ . DAIE: . ......._. . . , , (3A 'aV CI Lc 1 STIo1L.K11 I )j9 {Al ardvi1 ILA (iQ/N) xl 31:)31:9 3N t4:f 5,1.14 • E <14/e,) . .l:a:ic:: J� '4'N VIA 'a/I; :3rLJ, (i. .;3??1/ANY . 60431Z . • . G411 '215 AltA -9it-1 A3ThhA 51341 --fir Cl-srli .0(fr'' . . . . . Z‘. • C "%.•1 .-Lit:I/laid ,a•7L >rda(715 i G.L 1 : 3sYl tn . _ - • ._ >t%?`L1S'c:7a-A11t chi saver.'...1- '/01 1911Vi 6'IP?J-4 i SLl :S Dy = V4 1Le1=4i1 6 �IJ I•,1 _ .. - •:;74(1.43a .LaL/NI —a-i ea a32/7 VNFASIVt7 . .LV .fr 19 z 9 IVani 1-137 241/.2.1rivteivivi9 Wr1lC)/1 ; 7;11 ra'if 7.1 ?CIA d2A 1 y".72M-V11 AVMf,S'lfl ;haa:t 1%1 - :141 j( 01 XVIII i}f:131-1fil'a. :3 Obi.-iva.: "Q iaL 'yid 9•b. "2rr// tZ/ (rood.LS.v�T 'l'V d 't'Yd °/-t" '20d, Zy" c7i Inj .153/H ,by.'PYV 6 h • �H/LLeI T(_1i�( f Lc', 11' • yM/-1.71 i A S 17t'A t 1'tv ni I.r ,./ -. 14.:JEJ r '`1rS"-A. '?1t•r/4 Z. ; 'X2 '2./H/op - $Z'h S2'2 LIAa''-/:ZI 'W d Sti2'i21. 1437 *1 '6'llf6.. 'a'fw//5 = 5S'XOo 'aHi'i- - 5e'A5- Z Pl,�-.-iv ad 'MY . oat' 2 X177VA MdfrW G ri7L�/ �,dp �.:Lbrr75Sl j � - Nc2W 3' G'/c'L�,cL %0 • siv.-,, •filf cZ ;' 3,V% .L2c'/c-h t 'Xc:uxtcy' Z-n • adv.54-76 - it.VE xSSG SR3/%J•►i1id' O66B-2�(906) oz9 i;"?L' 1 f 1V_ =l'_L v6L Z x i—&' l71MLIV,/ 'RLIS' 011086 tIOURRIVIIMPI133131,1 jai/S :. •z'L/x 09 old:'/ f..:rac-r.1/17' Z901 A39 '95'3AdAL94 cone i5'''? .y'-- z• fG7.r ' ^i::: '%illy: aiarnn Pirn sp q :as'vr. lsty • k 2 /s ��� 1 �. 9 CVO C g 1./.1.A, 9..&11.1 �Z" ht !IR , �J 1 "� a&?1 ht0 Uri'!i.79::•.1/a 1. ;`r lt_r me g-_,lj..iu 7tri.%-.7.Thi 39 Nu 73fj� '1!'/Z/•!V _ AVMrra'l-1 KC317U/1 92-A/N . es g.. XCI .S' Jl4d vv�• :�Cvfl'13/1/Wl :1X1eN5. , ', , , r TRUS JOISTCI 'Z= ORATION. . .-- , ; MEfCER ISLAND SALES OFFICE - .. P.O.BOX 680•MERCER ISLAND,WASHINOTON 98040 A/C 208/232-8815 • RAY FIEDLER • i : (4,4AJE MVO* 7124.1Pbao0Y 1 . • : i' i ' /3i,g-T 1/0 I PAW reelktra Ad, I * !SO/Ike t % o c /vi/A/. ' 7--.g bi1. . ' • . : 94-4 71Zosion f/V. WO1 127 liaalVei = . HAY. 4-6 pM. • - : i i I i . 1 { • H . 70414 7724Prie.AAA ,431cWD ' 11377'Wittle- 23 PM*I, ' . ' 7.P, . • Pafg Volgiv0 PM. Wari506W0 1 ,;2., Ade AO. rna Pea N/4J . 4-d rM. - PPAPWAFR& 4 0v. Mgr :_<•UW gat m. = FexN//J • 7-f 4" • F 'RA9. Viesregfook0 /o f /Lt • = " f0z1ti/a/. 116, ,. ) 1 ri2VN N( 41/AY RtaWal imago ' 2/f, #44 1Ale : Paws la/AmAn3S proapr-Kro&roar Lava 04-r • - IngSaitotan, Ane AV tc#'Nls. FBI: Rig..- ✓% /377 -Kg S' Sr- /751- - - L al Finn. Talc 1 - /®%z 04 . /a1'°t 26.1 f o! I 7-9 9.P $/ IN. J i . z 37c c9 Cases wit Roy w s LAugs, . _...7. . le 3°- *------ _______________2gtll 446. . 2i 01.6 s a suss" ...."- • �. �--- _' — `�--_____ IlA> H/GNWAY .. . . LIt ram+ -Lr �.6= Also "li o4 apr°"ikg . ____.._.__ /i. D. Ater-eh•J 4 Ni" -_-�'." i a/V .7A7.f,' 'r )t§ • , / ze-4.- a LOCATION; ____ ___ _._....__......_.____ ___.__..__.._._._.______,.__._____._.__._._.... SI IEET ....... ..AA OM Pak.1..... OWel L......jnallz®d "1'" Intersection Capacity d(,.ti.?allatlon Form I-1 I Intersection Location Plan: Counts: /1APLE i/AL.Ley Hwy bate /9 9 D Id Day Like-k.da 4 A ® Time Pm Pe NA • .. —. 1 � Con,roi STOP (R,., C 1 SNA�A/4 o,Q/e.Et�y Preveinnp S pee d�Z�_ Hourly Demand VYa(fIe Volumes from_4 to .__P m Approach A n' . f) 7 c "Y'°' Movement Ar --4•• AR -11" Ir. ( 8r 'c`- .Ca "1 Ca " .Volume 1000 7 9 /333 37 4S pch owe table U ..z..._'^`' :>3''i s,' n`° .. ... , • Step i Right'Gbrn ikons C Ca re. • Conflicting Flows s Mp- Si Aa + A? ® • • (flora Fig. 0) 4' + 400 a 4 4- - Critical Gap from Table 2 To- Z sec Capacity from Fig.2 fl M .a Me a' 3690 as V Shared Lane—See Step 9 No Shared Lane Demand© Co mg Available Reserve Q PA,—Ca a cea ..- __ . Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) ED Step 2 Left Vern from R I9e, r . Conflicting Flows o Ma•` An + Ar - (from Fig. I) .� + loOo s �0 7 wa . sill • Criticd Cap from tbble 2 8e A •D sec — — T Capacity from Fig.2 v Ma.L M,Ca 362 0 wo - -• Demand N. • 8a-—9---10 Capacity Used s ma(We)- 2.5 9t Impedance Factor from Fig.9 fl lea® .98 • • Available Reserve a Me—8a o—3-5-1-sta : Delay&Level of Service("ihble 3) 5k'i--f4'e/a 78 al Step Si Left 1%rm from C Cs "1 Conflicting Flows.:Pin a l Aa+ At + fiia + 8r. (from Fig. 1) A.+42D+1.,+,/ • .a Critical Cap from Table 2 To© •0 sec Cepachy from Fig.2- Ma,a. as • ' • Adjust for Impaluae MK,st Pe u Ma .en No Shared Lane Demand- Cs Q as Available Reserve- Ma—C1.- van Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) i Shared Lane Demand m Ca+Ca a Cis a— ors Shared Lane with Right Ibm • (Ca+Ca) Capacity of Shared Lane- MO a (Ce/M1)+(CtiMil Ma is 68 p . Available Reserve o Mos—Ca,----L ie+n Delay&Level of Service f ibble 3) '%/ U. ® . i Overall Evdrstfo rt . .� • • . 1 �i IgnallNed "T" Intersection Capacity'\ z^uiation Form Ill • Intersection Location Plan: • Counts: id AMPLe iffitz.Ey Hwy bale /99e Day WeeL.do A R Time A M P/. 102 aft Control STOP CR-11 I C I t S 99 is DRIVEWAY Prevailing Speed'40 ' !gaudy Demand'Baffle Volumes from_2_to_.2........A...m Approach A ' s ' c "V® Movement AT -} As N. f 0r .0- Cr. 1 Ce e"" . • .Volume /472 50 (02 /35 9 IZ • pCh bee table I r ? '. `n>°i%1;'.> s.::.. .. Step II RIghQ Two from C CI! C Conflicting Flows E.Mr:- / AR + AT m (from Fig. II 25 + /492... a /5/7,76 Critical Gap from Table 2 Yv a 7 0 see • Capacity from Fig.2 o MN."MI Q 63O co 11 Shared Lane-See Step 3 No Shared Lane Demand m Ca- u, Available Reserve m MI-CR© pc, • Delay d3 Level of Service(Table 3) [I • Step 2 Left Turn from S 01. r •Conflicting Flows a Win a An + Ap a (from Fig. 1) 0 + /�9 2. /54 ate„ .010 Critical Gap from Ihble 2 T9 a (4• 43 sec = Capacity from Fig:2 a - Ma,I.m,--Demand /o®_ -_- -- - mand el0o 0 6 z pa. • Capacity Used a 100(81/M2)a_La&9} Impedance Factor from Fig.3- p®a ®.S . Available Reserve- Ma-go, 38 re,Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) I/ /cal9 lle./A4,e MI Step 2 tall Tam from C Cs - Conflicting Flows-Mp- 1/2AR+ AT + 8s + Br- (from Fig. I) ?Ss+/J+a+/3i'm /7/410 Critical Gap from Table 2 To E. 9.0 see Capacity from Fig.2 is him.. 3 0 tea Adjust for Impedance M .x P,,a M,a /5 rd No Shared Lane Demand I. CZ d .e, Available Reserve a Ma-CI,a r Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) tJ / Shared Lane Demand= . Ca+Cs Q Cm,s g•f I*a • V Shared Lane with Right Um (Ca+Cs) .• Capacity of Shared Lane a Mrs a (C,/Mil+(CJM,) • MI,B Z 8 n, . . - I Available Reserve- MI -CIIL-—2—PA , " Delay A Level of Service(fable 3) V�lanq D2/ s a] . Oterdt Evaluation - Y: • '- _ • •- - .. • :x` r��i -r'w '•Y'J :'ram'''J _ t" v r- _ a���: �Y-;ram' -i••':�.y >�.. - ••i - - 'w•-cam ::`r•�'� "a:•.^;-•.-?;::. _ •�'� Fk'� ' g-a - - +w rr ''b'r '.az r.'f z,•.:�s r'; ;:�: 1` :. a. lr �. ?a `.�,- t,+. .ate 4 :rT•? .Cc s L • a • • - o yy >-. l l - :yLr:• _ _ it. ie"•. ..;_erg ,4'. r u+4. •i' K ram,... -•.�- 7-- :.��: :=� r'a���V �,. �5' yam. 'il ! ti��t :ei�K�., k?� ' }+•%rt�T Y•' :7• -�YI'�'4y'"j � 1.. 't 'r'- 'i..v .1� _ y A ..}ear. tii-_h.+- Wy "4•-v - � �i .`.' .yd •Te•f-Y '�._ .la"Y i.�;'+l� +r:� .J..;.' �{, �I•_t`^ �jl i - 4•�+�r:+z'' '-'�M - .4'-'• •\'6 �y�•{^'7• .7a'' � : T7 �'o .�r +.•�':. P.u'v: :r1.'.' •1•-: Aa..';'F' w�7. :mot"_ <.� ,.^.L 'P�'. -- •t,or .U:. .'v* ;,..Y`?t:. ..ra„ .;:t.- 3„'a.c+.,;. - r.tenf :-il e.6:;-.:. ' + .`� rr., 'r fi_ .n,':-•r:dw•. r� ..'�:GFl.:a-.:Y•v• .,r.- .r-.,;: _�•r.•!.>�x. ..ka:c�s*c:;�r +,,.._:., .r�.•�4 •r '-S�• •S�^ ..y,�r- -•;:t_"a. :4 --`'a :.i r d% _ `;4i+i .-.P- ri.s•s-1, :+`•_:n"':.�-7,:• t•-^::-"._.^_.r� :4" r:. -.` a,•• _ ::•:fit: :'•.'..':• - -vim. .a�:•S•`: - ':.:.j.. .y try:.- - i fF� r.' e.-r tr� • : :^.Ay `1-`, MEMO M OyrY: INTEROFF ICE ;: ..� /:.r. : . .leo :, :•.1 DATE° • • ti•.a'ram ,r-5;;`q}.+,�r'..F':a> ^ '_.<iv�' .-- _ 13, 1987 w= >. '• .. 4 ;; TO.: DON E. MAY � .. �•,i•.-lei•. i.!1tr':}�^%\�s...-, v'.1'. .. y yygy'y� • �wa , ,! ,ice�2`: ,r '-�.'`..v-i v. - ;`. 3: '� .�e,: • =. FROM: JERKY L. 4' _ :'•G,�4r Vic• • .}' ... '� ; . ,: SUBJECT• 4 '`` '7t_s '3�1 u=;�_`,M SHANE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT r - 1 = i. T-. d ustment that we v "' fy • I have reviewed. the above referenced .lot line a j • }st: - - - 1� ' for Mr.. Shane and its my opinion that we should - ,,:-�. received on May 12th the ro erty rather than go through the lot line ad- ;: have him rep1at p p _ �•�" y �i ustment process My reason is because: ' ':}% gip: : -`t,.:+•'� -yam- - F .. ,.d J;.:... ':">: ,' K' ` "� different from the ~y--!_' = °�-i .- �•yf'�� 1. The new lot arrangements are substantially °minor -f be construed as :Yi d , `= -"" final lot lines that that they cannot r_.: ';. ;.- ; a adju very odd in shape. -w4•r; :. adjustments Lots 3 & 4 in particula'rr>are ^!w �" y third of it's original �s ` ' '= een reduced to 1 ess than one _ 2 2. Lot no: 2 has: been Hi hwa and directlyonto Maple Valley g Y '`. •`r'I'' ,,•• ' size and formerly had,access - ,°'`- is shown only on the on-ramp to I-405 which .. Bronson Way. Access now 1;_ =' `, ' al access is not leggy • e in with our Department policy regarding lot line adjustments, we • In ke p g a lication to be processed as submitted. -a should not permit this pp -.1 ..:rr� :.ice.. 1 i'b5 r r.yt. i-.- _ fix".'--': V-�1:�"' K �,(u Y y` y�. v.t�•s� ThJS:' �^-i":' `i4:`'• "yE%�iv:• ;F - t / }�y - - .p- _•'�. Jti,•e?_':}xLe ^r•;- q ,>'l•• ::°xS •�, r 'v�?_ '.'r-,,- -•r.kV_.' .E.'. -s-.+'•� - .=�}.:• 1.y'• - J'f - _ ;.tom :�: ,'y.._a~ w _ 'may _ - - - - _ may.:, :.� - • •Y •5' K t- 4 , Vb 6.V�b'Yo,o1�'YbVYtl� \.•C 1_d ►+� o.saw.w, C. @ATk"td$1 'k' 1,-t7rr. 1r i€' t, a HOUSING-Rugged.heath ,i'-iu a li htwei ht (,,1 ty' r.�,, 9 9 9 Vt r :9 l:" i ?f ±� aluminum housing. Rectilinear shape, internally 4 -t PI �s U ,r iii+seam welded corners for weathertight integrity. Y �f r„ % tt# %ciY ()* F 7 . 1 1,• EPOM one-piece,continuous•gasketed, extruded, J U1� ,� (� � � aluminum door frame with impact-resistant ';f 1 X1I150/200 . tempered glass lens. Extruded aluminum arm for C,vll�,(JG/ZONING DEPT. d,. pole or wall mounting. Standard dark bronze finish t i p 6" with eleven optional architectural colors. ka o OPTICS-Unique one-piece hydroformed reflector. ,. A•_ HIGH PRESSURE 1 Multi-faceted,segmental design with three- / ' W, e�o��CiR��Inn. dimensional parabolics for precise light control. L' Y SODIUM , o BALLAST/ELECTRICAL SYSTEM-High power 7-•-..... T factor ballast, factory tested for reliable operation. 1 ��. 0 r. Electrical components are isloated from the optical :; chamber to provide excellent heat control and long ballast life. Removable power door for ease of t , installation/replacement of electrical components on ', medium and large housing. Positive locking Gj I disconnect plug. w y.txltEN9tOd19- o LISTING-U.L.listed suitable for wet locations, rpnrn ww. wtdttt, ,�,,, t ' "Ir. M911Fltrdt] W,Attnl In•Cm tn•Cm tn.tm 250/ 18rt>J.17mt 21•533 15.30.1 7v•t9.4 r 15 to 50 Ft.Mounting j 300'/.22md 2441.020.782 t9»•194 9'4.2400.20 .C,J, initial Lumens 9,500.140,000 1 . •f006W 3OW/29mt sem2 23'4-5oi 10,4407 < Fos ruo90„a.onu00m1fromn 4144... Lamp Life 24,000 Firs. - a ORDERING INFORMATION The luminaire catalog number guide below illustrates the variations available and establishes the components to build a catalog number for ordering purposes.To use,select the wattage,mounting,voltage and options for your requirements,then transfer the designations to the appropriate blocks.Accessories should be ordered as separate line items. TYPE— . . __.._.... .. . . WATTAGE OPTION$ • WATTS WEIGHT DESIGNATION✓ • , Ibe/kg � i f SUFFIX DESCRIPTION - I -HS House Side Shield 100 19/8.6. 100E i : -SF Single Fuse(120,277V) 150 (55v) 20/9.1 1505 + , • t 200150 22/10.0150200S � -OF Double Fuse(208,240,480) 250 24/10.9 250S ❑ -PER/PE NEMA Twist-Lock PE(120,208, _` 400_ 39117.790pS U I - 240V) + 1000 53/24.1 1000E [j -PER/PC7 NEMA Twist Lock PE(277V) + ' ' 1 -PER/PE4 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(480V) + MOUNTING -PER NEMA Twist-Lock,PE DESIGNATION ✓ • (Receptacle Only) (Square Pole) SP 12 , _,. _,_. , ,. • -OMB Architectural Color,Medium Bronze (Round Pole) RP 12 ' -DCS Architectural Color,Sand Stone (Wood Pole or Wall) NRP 12 -DCI3 Architectural Color,Black(Semi-Gloss) VOLTAGE , -DCC Architectural Color,Capri Blue Optional Mounting DESIGNATION✓ -DCA Architectural Color,Aztec Tan (Mast Arm)* t AA 120 -DC1t Architectural Color,Garnet (Degree Arm Pole) DA 12P 208 -DCZ Architectural Color,Citation Gold (Degree Arm Wood Pole or Wall) DA 12W 0 • 240 0 I -DCW Architectural Color,White(Semi Gloss) 'Not available 100,150 and 200W units. • . 277 lD -DCG Architectural Color,Gray ACCESSORIES 480 0 -DCO Architectural Color,Ocher Tenon Mounting Slipfftter is ordered as separate line - -DCN Architectural Color,Natural Aluminum item.Important with this accessory,an RP 12 or optional + Includes as separate Receptacle and Photocustrcl.field installed. DA 12P mounting arm must be ordered on the futures. shipped separate item and must be installed. NOTE:For more details,see options and accessories sheet C-OiA Tenon 1 2 2 3 3 4 • Size fixture fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures For color reference,see color guide sheet DC. at 190° at 90° at 120° at 90° at 90° • 241-0.D. T2.1130 12.200 12-290 T2-320 12.390 12-490 27/8-0.0. T3490 T3-290 13.290 T3-320 T3-390 T3-490 4° O.D. T4-190 T4-280 T4-290 T4-320 T4-390 14.490 a: ��,,,, NOTE:For moredetails,see options and accessoriessheet C-O/A. a". 1:171 {.,1.-,'f'< t'Y,ft.t'1:.nY•,�V�.. � 1 k t�iKikti:1Y't3i'ttra f' t?.p �•r z�*....X;1<t r' �traT�'ie.�F'i Y,$i`i6+3it5i'��3 i�hM'tYl{,tip?al'tZf,f'`.xY�tiitit:lkt 76/.l +, �a t t t o-.. kl,;i,.f,?A t, f rikr�!�,113i1tit�lri "l1„1!yq tatl`•f. 044'44,y Q' JOB NUMBER APPROVAL STAMP .f , ,1' JOB NAME LOCATION • Mkt > vl u• cYe "r r3 4xst7r 3} -y; tf`tiU f.lr• y • r%',4;, t w.1 Y#i�•; iL'folats`xr4't1r, d t.,�t° u'�/� q/�/ q #*���� tr'��k r�s�ra3��°t',�iiit�l3trsli�2,(ju., YM _ir;•w:i7 r+/��lf/iY!!lM .*•.x..�u.+;nd1F.".,.i�1i�,t�,.,r�,'i4sr, h'• . . TAAS . PHOTOMETROC DAa I The charts below provide the most useful data from photometric tests of specific lamp/Iuminairo combinations. For complete results of any combination shown, or other requirements, contact your IJTHONIA/WI.TEK ropresontative. 7 TAA 1 505 LAMP: 150 watt High Pressuro Sodium Lamp rated 16.000 Lumens TAA '3 a pqA °�'QQS LAMPFcotco 200ill.watt High Pressure Sodium temp rated 22.000lumows ' yggi ten Roper MA 160w Peofcandlo values based on 20'mounting height Test 0epett No.10909 Footcondie values based on 30'msunting height pp 41 INITIAL FOOTCANOlE9 FLUE 019TAIOUTION INITIAL FOOTCANOLEO a FLUE 00TITI1UT10N 1 F•R Li 2 -60 �_111117101/ ■■■ 00\vtAYARD LUMENS •.OF LAMPS 2 '.■ COWMta\RD LINCrre %OP LAW! ri 1 ..,,._ i mom, s.N4 71 7 4 i 1 3 I1iII-- AaaR 4.45 79 3 ���'� wan 4.4N 70 7 TOTAL 11,4l4 71 a i I�1-- \ a S 1 TOTAL 18.444 40.0 !1�fl3h1II�� .; ,Il ly■ B ad COOFPICIH1Tf5 t3F UTIIIEAnOH �'' t _ 2.■. p.am/� ! 4Fi C013Pnoternt a*I/rumors ! ..■ 3 0.4 3 a4���:,.., g 4 ■■■■�■ •M• NEM 4 ---u■■ 8 0.3••,--- 0 dSTANC[R41A'ATOCP OI04T5 OH 5 0 •' 0 1 2 3 4 5 a 0$M--�� CIONTS I,,' -. OfBoow r a,U7.T9 OP mammmscTI000 0T071 I'I..�. .rouNTYda3oYrcoeaserwYFAcroa 0.1 rmlpmNOaaaaTeOtayeT10er4eTOn InivvWu.•4.or.2 ca10,11..taal1111111111111111111 ta•4R^.4 me 1.ev...y 0.03.4tVCwte:I..1 a•1 '...-�.-, 14 ti 1 34 ROM:Causation Parfet 1 2 3 4 ton.•1.30 !` 14I. • ov tor 100W,Multiply by.59 0 1 2 3 4 5 i4 h.• 01 0 1 2 3 4 a 701. SITamura slaMausera Of=WO as 83111.13 13 h.• .31 mantras s07111,1 MOTS Or U010771lOtW011t0 e6 • • TAA 25 QS LAMP:250 watt High Pressure Sodium Lamp rated 30.000 Lumens TAA 400S LAMP:400 watt Nigh Pressure Sodium noted 50,000 Lumens Test R./post No.tons /oateandlo values based an 30'mounting hoight too O.port No.10313 Foolcondis votuoo based on 30'mounting height .. INITIAL FOOTCANDLES FLUE 00TR1OUTTON INITIAL POOTCANOLES FLUE 070T100UTWN DOWNTARD LUMENS •;OF LAtGPS 2 11611.111111 ... room 13.eso •4 3 MOM` •,....,. .�■ OOWNv nD L�ME 0 •.OP LAMPS + aaaa CAW o �vs Y T�m�. Fawn 1115.■� TOTAL 77.740 73 8 ; , RLAA 14 730 7v S 0IMO" O `,`t'■■ TOTAL 37,000 73 0 • • i -��I'�■■ COEFFICIENTS 07 UTLOAUOTI. I J/ �_� peaimmi 0.6 COEFFICtENTSOFUTILOATION f ■Sa ����. o.ss !' 0.5���� = a 3 0.4 r nosn�mea ' 3 ra��'®■S ���,OINIMINNI � 4■■■■■■ 0.4 El 0.3 auao�emn i•� 4 ---�- ti 0,3�4-, .- 2 3 4 S 0 Oa 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 U !r-�- OWTA7X'EMIl3fr17�t70il:fT0if1 � DISTANCEWUNITS OF I�UNTtND HEtt:NTS 0� 1AOYMT.tO as.OM CCIMaCT10N Fat TOR 0.1 MOUNTING YfIONT COAAEcnoN racros ,�,...- te.RVlra.hpegst.r.rmnlact.rl ' Wty a.f ..-.- 7eh.•1.]] (MAW,IM.c••T•..r...cant...Iwo.) IJ • .34 h.• .75 0 1 2 3 4 . 5 34lt I 33 0 1 2 3 4 Ss a.• e7 tnc 071510s0MalLtrla110WT..am TO 30 It e1 5 _ ♦ pp ��•+.�j(� A A g reer¢traaOMRYC1repl.WaraOtaaJrm TAA 1 0005 LAMP:1,000 watt High Pressure Sodium rated 140,000lumons ELECTRICAL RICAL CHARACTERISTICS TRr Stp.r1 No.10703 Peotcandie vattoot bawd an 40'mounting height Ices=Oen ► ASAOY rowan • _ FRUAART (AMN►51 020POU/ POUT /ACTOR INITIAL FOOTCANOLES FLY11 0I3340031itON V7A1TA00/OAUAI 04 T VOLTA 5TMT/07sfSO . VOtTAOR WATTS (%) UM V•LAMP LIMsM 2 `. 009I14 KSRD LUMENS 1*.°F LAMA 130 .3.00/1.05 IM 1•^-^ ,1 .. now mo - 37.424 41 0 150 NA•1WP 240 1.00/ .03 102 143 So. •5%■•13% 0/•��` am03.40] 36 s 277 .05/ .72 222 �� TOTAL 16].40v 77 s 400 .SO/ A9 SG wawa t } ■ 170 1.54/2.22 00 ti1........ 1 �. 200AutH Motet 200 .80/1,20 150 2-,��.■ OA COEFFICRNTSOPURU7wTION p 277400 67/340 1.00 200 243 00. •fop.•10% 360 iiii 1 ral 700 1.00/2.75 1.00/1.10 190 46 4 -.�■■■ �+ t11res ' 250 Auts•Rqufetor 240 AO/1.30 100 200 904 • 10%■•sox• $ /..R1ntrl+�� 277 .70/1.I0 705 . 0 1 2 3 4 5 a 02,A.... 4M 3R/ .49 300 001MCCE 0sWINSOFettluYifq mamas a1 /. ____ . 120 2.02/4.30 90 1., slolenlsnrttatticaansotentracres 200 1.56/7.45 I40 Moo"wa boo to a c4n.t.a•etnal 4013Autopogulet.• 240 1.30/2.I5 ISO 405 e0• • 10%••lox 34 h.•1.21 1••.-- 277 1.I D/1.06 2w M h.. .23 0 1 2 3 4 5 480 .75/1.07 360 e4 h.• .e• Mm MH IgsepWn5w YOuFtt..MGM' -,R2 120 0.00/9.20 90 203 . 4.60/5.30 156 .•' `' �,TH®N®A tees AYf►RepYlefM Tao 4.00/4.60 f(►p 1090 I►0. .lox•.10% n '- 777 3.30/4.00 700 400 7.p0/2.50�>. no kI H1 TE// ram. iId3I� i Tested to current IES and NEMA standards under sla4ftltsd laboratory eondttions.Various operating *mow INDUSTRIAL/OUTDOOR LIGHTING factors can cause dlfforanas botwoen laboratory data and actual Odd measurements,Olmsnslons end specifications in this atelog are based on thv most currant available date end we subtsot to change. PO.BOX/2•CfL►WiORDSYtLIE.I,WIAF/A47033•USA•a:7Ap7.t837.1L•lE%2T1392(•a-0RAMR TAA S clAJYHONIA WHOM2:85 DM..N.a.•.,4.1••••••.,...m . _..; . ..] c_•. , 6.‘ .. . . • 1 1 • . , _ • . • • •• •. i • . . • . ... „.,. • i I . . V • . i • . . . •• . qq• . . . • . . I• • . • • . . . . . . . .. . . • . . • es:' .. ,. . .. . . 10.. t..„, • .. ..., qpi....• • /..,,,,,, i• __- -7---- ":..-t------a' - • f:,,:4' -II- , o ' • '50" ..', .7. 9 . 132"31 _..,..---,-',^ •i• •• th to I - . ••••....).-v4- 1,ori.s•-•,„„i'-k•‘‘'..rk, ,„,,,- il i ___;_,. ..., . - ... • I ' li!-? w... • • -,-- --' —— . IV - '.- ••,.-" ', ±-i,. -.4 ‹rr • V.1A, 0 1 II V"\A•St ' • .; 010 72.82' / ;It •• 441 '.',;0; . ; ;13, 11, - vret,,, • i,c•- • ,,..,,,,,, . lit' ,It•IA ,,. ?,c, iy I 'I ‘ • .. Da .:;•••:•';"..1%) '4);), . , • 0,-.:..:..i..:-"' it'V • • • . i . • bp ....ij,•r ,,,,..• tv,.. 1 . !. • i, —‘,... ,;- ':... 4••••• .0. " • , 1 •• — •. ,P4 '. • " • -. y •• ea• . • 6\10,•.;5:::::-''''t„ • ki...N,' , No . 0? " ,, • + / r " < Nks,lei, .:' -';)k,„, 1 Ri . „ .. .s. •• / 660 + ' \,) -V...:e) / oc5 • (VI.- : 1. 1 . :. •Sig:4%.4.5%.t5 • XV': ...',.: ?Nrsql.,,,,e. i ,1!-'14.: , 1 • -te•,; •NI ••,•• • : , . I iii, ,i,,f,. •., •/ ":•••• ' • - • 10., - ./zp' NI\ ,_.. - , ••••••,, ',,,,,,/ ‘ • i 4 - IS' ' . -•f ii,N A rel, 1. ' '. .{'. ..: 'ri? . 4 v •A .c, 1". c` . • 4g''', i., . / - 'b• 6 '.' .''* c M-#0 . , ... • . • , •'' -.4.t.- ',i, •. . • • • • • . l • ,,,"V4,,t.,.V.0,•N\S„-•-.°V..•i„' A• 0,') • 4T 0( i0., °e A,.0S *a•1A.Vd.'o•0. •.I....•s:k.P'••P••;',..•';;...,•,'"zv.*-:','„*i..'•,-'A•' .• ••• •... ,,i0•„.A.,.I,'...•,v....,....4,4,L.1 i. 1 .. ' , /j% , '• . :.;; ' Zi• q •. • • • L'14444P • 0 it 0‘3.4. . 0... e.•,,.,:;. ,v7) , ,-, • e,04' .00 . . •...:',Wg . : , • 0,jr,1% . "'" / • 'AI." LOT 3 •Are , , .,. .• . ; c ..c".d tb, / . . - .4,1\ ........____ F5 1 ,. ',0. ei " % . , ;1;11/4.` AV 891,602 S.,// . , . '0' -•/./ 41;pyr *-, -• )' / fto ip ,•• . . • 4 , . 131 el.).Aiej.,' • ' .0155 ' I•t; • Ittp, '• .•%9 ;_, „IiNv•' N41°07'29W(D) ,* • • tw 1000(D) • ••'-o- "4 ) 4,';t, 17 • ' • - b 0/;-V,• )- 4=.• •- i- ' 0 _, ',V( .48°52I I gm) -y,• - *00 u-,9, -4b 60.00(D) r , • . r. ° Nkk & 4 . ts) . 0, , . . . . 0 .474'• • ' )A4' '''\' • . AI . :'si.;0,, ifItt`P ''. • .„, 17 "I • '.51 , Nyt. VI, A d i ‘3,9 'f'+' .17) 1 0 -4.t", 1,44‘. '0 •\li* 4 LOT 4 .ca, 4;) .t - - • . ., .,. . • • Vd. ,4 .',' •! t,, IL ‘<%.,..,,, • ' • \...4,.4.-t , • e •i •.4.• . 1 • . ,•!, - -ORIGINAL INTERIOR LOT LINES ,,, GO - 0 . ii . ,- ... ti-0 N2 1157 W • . 1 ORIGINAL 8 FINAL LOT LINES ' • ''-' 64.40' . , . ; 2 - FINAL-INTERIOR LOT LINEt . , • 01 . ----- -- EASEMENT LINES i 4(4A• ...--.. TAX LOT NO. , Q90) • . . • ..rf -• • 1 • .. • ../ - .•,.., • . . • . , • NOTE: BEARINGS AND DISTANCES FOLLOWED BY "CD)" • • • . T .•, .;: , ARE AS CALLED OUT ON DEEDS. .; • .; . • N 85 . • • .• 1, . • . .pr-‹0 Poie.0 . ,.,.ii.. . . . ...,.; . . , -4.thiiiiiiii.i4.1v5,-, • ..... ,,, , • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 115 ROOM HOTEL, A3,900 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT AND A 40,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING GENERAL LOCATION: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY AND EAST OF I-405 PUBLIC APPROVALS: SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I.Tc HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THE ABOVE DO U ENTS W RE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARYBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing,in K i V'C r� . on the Day . of 19B7 • ) SIGNED• FORM 2,11 OF RFC ( ' ) A4TF0 054 OE PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-054-87 DESCRIPTION : RAMAC, INC. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 115 ROOM HOTEL, A 3,900 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT AND A 40,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY AND EAST OF I-405 PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : 1. SITE PLAN APPROVAL 2. BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS ANC, DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR R FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING. DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ®o l CITY OF RENTON amp BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 17, 1987 RaMac, Inc. - P.O. Box 653 Renton, WA 98057 RE: RaMac Inc. (Park Place) Site Approval (Files ECF-049-87, SA- 054-87) Dear Sirs: Building and Zoning Department has received the additional information requested and formally accepted it for the -above referenced project. Your application has been, routed and tentatively scheduled for the Environmental Review Committee on August 24, 1987, to consider your-environmental-checklist. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact Betty Grimshaw of this office at 235- 2540. Sincerely, Dona d K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 1 ,2 4111 CITY OF RENTON ee ,� ' y teLL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 17, 1987 Dan Shane 20919 SE 34th Issaquah, Wa 98027 RE: RaMac Inc. (Park Place) Site Approval (Files ECF-049-87, SA- 054-87) Dear Mr. Shane: Building and Zoning Department has received the additional information requested and formally accepted it for the above referenced project. Your application has been routed and tentatively scheduled for the Environmental Review Committee on August 24, 1987, to _ consider your environmental checklist. If you have any questions ' regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact Betty Grimshaw of this office at 235- 2540. (if:::71111t1 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 gt1-1. Pq 4y0 RaMac, Inc. July 14, 1987 art OF `E€ ` O.; RIECEni JUL 15 1987 BUILDING 1 ZONING DEPT. Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Building & Zoning Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: RaMac, Inc. ( Park Place) Site Approval 711 1094 dila ( Files ECF-049-87, SA-054-87 ) Dear Mr. Erickson : In response to your letter under date of July 1 , 1987, we have subsequently submitted to Dee yesterday, July 13, 1987, modified prints for the above referenced subject to include the following : 1 . Seven (7) copies of the corrected Site Plan . 2. Seven (7 ) copies of the complete drawings for the proposed restaurant. 3. Seven (7 ) copies of the drawings for the proposed hotel . We appreciate your expeditious approach to this Site Approval and look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours, RAMAC, INCORPORATED Dan Shane President DS : hgk RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392-4199 0. CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 1, 1987 RaMac, Inc. P.O. Box 653 Renton, WA 98057 RE: RaMac Inc. (Park Place) Site Approval (Files ECF-049-87, SA-054-87) Dear Sirs: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your environmental checklist and site approval application for the above referenced project. Your application is being held, pending receipt of the following information: 1. As discussed, we require a vicinity map that clearly r 21997 shows the surrounding land use for a radius of at least 400 ft. at a scale of l' :200". 2. 'A complete landscape plan must be submitted that includes information on the number and size of species, at the time of planting, spacing instructions, etc. Landscaping and surface treatment of pedestrian linkages needs to be coordinated with traffic circulation. 3. More information is required on the types of materials that will be used and how the various buildings on the site will be tied together with a common architectural theme. The development standards for the site should identify a palette of materials and suggest that all new buildings will use a minimum percentage of these. Typical materials should be shown on the building elevations. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 F,://> RaMac, Inc. July 1, 1987 Page 2 4. Pedestrian linkages on the site between buildings need to be better thought out. Also, it would be desirable if there was a pedestrian activated traffic signal allowing access from the site to the Cedar River Park. There should also be pedestrian linkages to allow future access through the site from the neighborhoods to the north to Cedar River Park. 5. •A drainage plan that clearly explains treatment for surface water runoff is required. Where will runoff from the underground CMP retention collectors go and how will runoff from the sloped parking that collects in retention ponds be treated? Existing and proposed contour elevations on the site should be shown. 6. Complete drawings for the proposed restaurant need to be submitted if this element is to be considered as a part of this application. If you have any questions regarding this project or this letter, please contact myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague of this office at 235-2540. Sinc=re ;y, Donald K. Eric son, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:BG av *��.. . x CITY OF RENTON ` BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 1, 1987 Dan Shane 20919 SE 34th . Issaquah, Wa 98027 RE: RaMac Inc. (Park Place) Site Approval (Files ECF-049-87, SA-054-87) Dear Mr. Shane: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your environmental checklist and site approval. application for the above referenced project. Your application is being held, pending receipt of the following information: 1. As discussed, we require a vicinity map that clearly shows the surrounding land use for a radius of at least 400 ft. at a. scale of l' :200" . 2. 'A complete landscape plan must be submitted that includes information on the number and size of species, at the time of planting, spacing instructions, etc. Landscaping and surface treatment of pedestrian linkages needs to be coordinated with traffic circulation. 3 . More information is required on the types of materials that will be used and how the various buildings on the site will be tied together with a common architectural theme. The development standards for the site should identify a palette of materials and suggest that all new buildings will use a minimum percentage of these. Typical materials should be shown on the building elevations. 200 Mill Avenue South -.Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Dan Shane July 1, 1987 Page 2 - 4. Pedestrian linkages on the site between buildings need to be better thought out. Also, it would be desirable if there was a pedestrian activated traffic signal allowing access from the site to the Cedar River Park. There should also be pedestrian linkages to allow future access through the site from the neighborhoods to the north to Cedar River Park. 5. A drainage plan that clearly explains treatment for surface water runoff is required. Where will runoff from the underground CMP retention collectors go and how will runoff from the sloped parking that collects in retention ponds be treated? Existing and proposed contour elevations on the site should be shown. 6. Complete drawings for the proposed restaurant need to be submitted if this element is to be considered as a part of this application. If you have any questions regarding this project or this letter, please contact myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague of this office at 235-2540. Sinc=re ,/ Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:BG G.R. (BOB) PARROTT, P.E. Consulting Civil, Traffic and Transportation Engineering CF June 3, 1987 REI C OF E �O V P C1 JUN 2 5 1987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC Proposed Self-Service Storage / Office / Restaurant / Hotel Complex TRAFFIC IMPACTS Gentlemen: The proposed project involves 40,000 square feet of office space, 3 ,900 square feet of restaurant, and a 115 room hotel complex located between the Maple Valley Highway and N. E. Third Street, just east of Interstate 405. The projected traffic impacts relative to development of the proposed project have been analyzed in detail and have been submitted to the Renton Traffic Engineering Division for their review. All data used in these analyses was derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers ' Trip Generation Manual and Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook. In addition, discussions have been held with staff members of the City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division and the Washington State Department of Transportation regarding existing and projected traffic volumes and channelization improvements to the Maple Valley Highway. Improvements to the Maple Valley Highway at the point of access to the proposed development have been completed by the developer. At the present time, these improvements include the construction of a separate left-turn storage lane for vehicles desiring to enter the proposed site, and a separate left-turn refuge and acceleration/merging lane for vehicles exiting the site in the eastbound direction. As part of the overall evaluation, a traffic signal warrant analysis was also performed for the proposed intersection of the Maple Valley Highway and point of access to the proposed site, at to request of the Renton Traffic Engineering Division. In 1029 Market Street Building•Suite A•Kirkland,Washington 98033.Office:(206)828-4266,Kirkland• Home:(206)488-9460,Bothell City of Renton Page 2 accordance with the criteria set forth in the Institute of Transporation Engineers' Manual of Traffic Signal Design, a traffic signal installation would not be warranted at this location should the project be developed as proposed. It can be concluded that, from the analyses performed and submitted to the Traffic Engineering Division, construction of the proposed project, incorporating the channelization improvements already in place, will result in no significant impact to existing traffic characteristics on the adjacent arterial streets and highways. If you have any questions or desire any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Yours truly, )47. ,/e /4;:e*. G. R. (Bob) Parrott, P.E. Traffic Engineer /ac JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS, INC. MEMO: Silver Cloud Inn Renton, Washington Material Selections: Roofing: Homestead Roof Tile as manufactured by Monier or equal . Color; Natural Brown (coac 'T;L1 Building: Smooth finished stucco (plaster cement) or equal . Color; Parchment (light beige) Building Recesses: Vinyl siding, double 5u. horizontal as manufactured by Flexlox or equal . Color; Warm beige Windows: Dual glased with bronze aluminium frames. • CITY OF RENTON RECEnfEl JUN ' 5 1987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 10620 N.E. 8th • Bellevue, Washington 98004 • (205) 454-3096 5U1Va1 OF R U� " �" ` : ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT U 4$ - z - '~ 8- RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 • 235-2540 9,o m. 0,9q'ED SEPS ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 20, .1987 TO: REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS FROM: BUILDING AND ZONING 'DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SA-054-87 THIS MATERIAL WAS OMITTED FROM THE ROUTING FOLDERS„ PLEASE ADD AND REVIEW. I -nTEROFF ICE ME 'a: v ' TO.: DATE: DON E. MAY 13, 1987 FROM: JERRY L. SUBJECT: SHANE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT I have reviewed the above referenced lot line adjustment that. we received on May 12th for Mr. Shane and its my opinion that we should have him replat the property rather than go through the lot line ad- justment process. My reason is because: 1. The new lot arrangements are substantially different from the original lot lines that that they cannot be construed as "minor adjustments". Lots 3 & 4 in particularrare very odd in shape. 2. Lot' no. 2 has been reduced to less than one third of it's original ' size and formerly had access directly onto Maple Valley Highway and Bronson Way. Access now is shown only on the on-ramp to I-405 which is not legal access. In keeping with our Department policy regarding lot line adjustments, we should not permit this application to be processed as submitted_ • : ,. . . . . . . . .• . . . . , . . • . . I . • ---. . . • I N r . . ... . • --N• • • l' y7, - ! . ' ..- - - - •- _ . , . • • . , . . % •;. eirf. fi,,,,....., ,., . ! • • _.--------- / , , - , . . , . 1 (9 • . . , . i . , . . . , 'ON' ,*,=•iv . -,) . . •.: .. - 6.10) . .. • . • . • , . . , ., • ‘ - , - - • - ; •A• •• . . . . 40 0-691 . . . . ., :. . : . . ! 4,, _ v / • . - i ,,.....____________,(4- .,. . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . , . . . . . , ... . . . . . . • ,.:,.. . . . „ . . .. . . . ._..__. . . . : : :::. „ ., : • ; . :_ • , ,- : . . , . . , . _ . . . . • . • ..... •.-.. :. . „ _.. . . • . a7. • .r' c.r - %ti': • • • ,: • - tom:::;.' . _ • _• ;rJ 5; iC^' y- ''.ce T _ • t,c, • _ g�^�'�,•.'v +iV,�...- ,7. 7 S`.._ — :('i:, al :„Y -Sys - oaf' _ :-�,�?.a`-y'.} -vr '2=� .'� .,y.� e z =l - `i .V• .M - .Pr: -S: a v':Y 4 1'� - - sf' .^`mow" 'f� -�, ;Ki. - %'t5:�y _ �. jig•ma's'=t J `LT• �l� .tt"):;'yam•:. .ic - YfY y: is - - p i tT' _:ram. ,Q=:5.., s•L� ~ti. ram+ -•i"•` ,lac ���>� -y,•a .`>y•^. _ 1 .:J •z- 3 - i p :41" •- f _ .e � .K ';'fiar� 3 .f ti- a,� .Y�r..tis�:� 9 :' .f. 'J :r;%%2, _r :v) Z•. c•r.i; . 4 .a:. :t. .n,, rsy .;;-,:-:it- .a.:-t;?T:' - .l. .4.-l•• -Ca i1'+ :%� �a�•1. -•:��,9 -'F :F'�_•�., l. in'"C�"..,•;.:Sj� �..Y Y.•'•(%ti; t-.. =`Xr:.:- `;-.?• :y a- ., :.,�:;kr +;sue - - - - (-. ':g.. 4^^,. s ...+., 3.r... �':a:_ ",��5:a.. �:.- - :n'%1''. ..ter_..••s.t,t• : -�-i:} :s a _ :_fir�� .'r� `i'; i •`r n 3'rlr Pl_ — i}• s. . INTEROFFICE • ihz SM. 1t < �: DATE• 1987 „ 5.- ,.i��:�,. --4--,.-`-, MAY 13, z w� .r 1;: .;.� .,� -:,:„-, =-. T®.. DON E E. cr:- .-- - • =x : :'� �::> ;-:.. -3 FROM: JERRY L. }- '" '!T:-G.�y*`TC:irk p- :,:r-,:..ram' _ ., - o l, ` >";as ":':.. SHANE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT • - - 'tip ' = +"2 = d. the :above referenced .lot line adjustment that we -_ :,,., •a.-.7 I have reviewed.tr: _ '� and its opinion that we should t"' May 12th.for Mr. Shane my _ _ received on throu h 'the lot line ad- e lat the property rather than go9 -__ ti . - have him r p l=` "`�`,, •' justment process. My reason is because: : , •'1 • ' • • different from the " ' = - '� - 1. The new lot arrangements substantial]y .:. are -y, =;-- ,, •�= •7. that that they cannot be construed as "minor >•> R= 3`- ;= ;;; _ ", original lot lines very odd in shape- ' " "' = —_''":; adjustments" Lots 3 & 4 in particularr`are . ^,. �.r. �• third of it's original � ` . �i ' '"''''` ti ` `' 2 has. been reduced• to less than one _ f onto Maple Valley Highway`� J: :;:: Lot' n d formerl had access directly p and ��;�;r�--:•- size an y the • to I-405 which is shown only on on-ramp G =� :, Bronson Way. Access now is not legal access. °` r`` in with our Department -policy regarding lot line adjustments, we In keep g =< sJ" _ permit this application to be processed as submitted. _ should not pp a• .•r .,• = rar A f' •�. =:: y� s �.� 0Ye w� �h fi r� ' � - \. r}" i,r. � . :. ..c'; _,:p .- ux• :i-*.k_ . ��` t=.�a. j .,z-, s-r� 3vim : ' ..a '5 s'rM•a "'t� cl i3 �a'r.'� ��'' ia $ � t � ,s 3 -a`-r " _ - aT__j .:.. .,E,- a : :ra.,-a. - : - • rva.. ��` :� .a r�•',�" -, •t, `�:'r4:T'.+,�:^:tia r, .._F:• . �:•s' ^••om'' r ,,ii,, i e : .;. e' _ . .-.t. - V . - -t-- • • .i� :�. .ta ' `brS - arc 'g tir?•e '•Y max. .. ..Dc• - %aY' trV.• YOIIryY Yi/11 r.r r Y v. ►..°.. • 1 1B1 o HOUSING-Rugged, hea ,,,y:,�ge,lightweight `5 b 0 , 5 i�� y 'l aluminum housing. Rectilinear shape,internally +-1 p t=� � �t`. r ti# J seam welded corners for weathertight integrity. ► p .#t� ;t j` ' . '4 7 :.1 EPDM one-piece, continuous-gasketed,extruded. J UN 1 'ig aluminum door frame with impact-resistant 1 0/150/200 Li . tempered glass lens. Extruded aluminum arm for 8!f I�fl f'vILD JG/ZON9NGbEPT. I �' O94OO� ��O®W; pale or wall mounting. Standard dark bronze finish �il�i', with eleven optional architectural colors.e OPTICS-Unique one-piece hydroformed reflector. r• �'�� PRESSURE Multi-faceted,segmental design with three- / ' W., l� dimensional parabolics for precise light control. L' -y SODIUM o BALLAST/ELECTRICAL SYSTEM-High power /-- Tfactor ballast,factory tested for reliable operation. 1 ��,. D 1-.1.l,�� Electrical components are isloated from the optical chamber to provide excellent heat control and long %., ballast life. Removable power door for ease of � IT, installation/replacement of electrical components on C i r medium and large housing. Positive locking • . J"."". j t 45 disconnect plug. 0 00lGN510715• a o LISTING-U.L. listed suitable for wet a locations. tlma, vrlcln ,,, 1r011IISW0 6St.ea�nA1.n1 YeCm 1.1•C.11 41Cm r;,1007150/2C4/W 1.6119.17ms 21.533 15.30.t 74..184 1. (5 to 50 Ft.Mounting 25014W4 2.311+/22m. 2441.0 10N JYS 4�h•2Y.1 + ornA 300•128m. 30.702 2319.687 1048.267 Initial Lumens 9;5130-140,000 'Fa xauel.em105m•rramsCwa.�uos. ! Lamp Life 24,000 Hrs. t. • ORDERING INFORMATION The luminaire catalog number guide below illustrates the variations available and establishes the components to build a catalog number for ordering purposes.To use,select the wattage,mounting,voltage and options for your requirements,then transfer the designations to the appropriate blocks.Accessories should be ordered as separate line items. TYPE- i TAA ! • WATTAGE ! i .w ; OPTIONS `°' WATTS 11 1_"IGHT DESIGNATION✓ ,' SUFFIX DESCRIPTION lbs/kg i , 100 19/8.6. iOQS t -HS House Side Shield 0 r . -SF Single Fuse(120,277V)150 (55v) 20/9.1 150S 200 22/10.0 2003 0t f -OF Double Fuse(208,240,480) 250 24/10.9 E l -PER/PE NEMA Twist-Lock PE(120,208, 2505240V) +400 39/17. _ _ 400S [� -- -PER/PE7 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(277V) 1000 53/24.1 1000S 0 -PEA/PE4 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(480V) + MOUNTING . , -PER NEMA Twist-Lock PE • DESIGNATION ✓ (Receptacle Only) (Square Pole) SP 12 ' -OMB Architectural Color,Medium Bronze (Round Pole) RP 12 -OCS Architectural Color,Sand Stone (Wood Pole or Wall) WW 12 -DCB Architectural Color,Slack(Semi-Gloss) VOLTAGE . -DCC Architectural Color,Capri Blue Optional Mounting DESIGNATION to, ' -DCA Architectural Color,Aztec Tan (Masi Arm)' AAA 120 -DCX Architectural Color,Garnet (Degree Arm Pole) DA 12P 0 208 0 -DCZ Architectural Color,Citation Gold (Degree Arm Wood Pole or Wall) DA 12W o -DCW Architectural Color,White(Semi Gloss) • 'Not available 100.150 and 200W units. ' . 277 0 ' -DCG Architectural Color,Gray ACCESSORIES a80 p -OCO Architectural Color,Ocher Tenon Mounting - -DCN Architectural Color,Natural Aluminum item.Important with this accessory,an RP 12 or optional + Includes Receptacle and Photocontrol.Photocontrol DA 12P mounting arm must be ordered on the fixtures. shlpppds separate item and must be fieldd installed. • Tenon f 2 2 3 3 4 NOTE:For more details,see options and accessories sheet C-Ci A. Size fixture fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures For color reference,see color guide sheet OC. at 180° at 90° at 120° at 90° at 90° 234"0.0. T2.1110 T2.280 T2-290 T2-320 T2-390 T2-490 21/4"O.D. T3490 T3-200 T3-290 T3-320 T3-390 T3-490 • . 4" O.D. T4-120 T4-280 T4-290 T4-320 T4-390 T4-490 NOTE:For more details,see. options and accessories sheet C•O/A. a'". 5 7 .,.crr .gin t.aW.�.(34 w.Cf.U.OXy wIRVICO214#i1`:dVttrgei'Taa'1''ti?0.':0419+"41Ji,C4ali'`«!iV 5•T#O.J°.�'1,. .� ,i' , ��ppyyV ��tt��� ��rr,,��e WW::�� �>Y ."k�uNt1M..ti{,InWN4H'{: �Y )(1.1iV'C,ir:WL.� N�. + �-�''�iT rfO'eiyi1V•YC•i. 1- JOB NUMBER - APPROVAL STAMP • f i 4JOB NAME LOCATION l 4ra11S�;"7 14MTiF .1 n.K�t ♦ L v f,u+ ,n; gmatr,:,,olotitry/Pli?i+YN.r ilm:Azo t'+oakat's1;.tmltottit+l+d4t "' oszimE,#,''t,+u`I oflitvid;o iw lig'li"I+i+/I Hi&;'R S1 aciat#:cs7u`3 a; 4.4, `„I, .,•a. ;vrl:+,f+, Al i SMA 2/85 TAA S • PHOTOMETROC (Mt ( .1 The charts below provide the most usoful data horn photometric tests of specific lamp/luminoiro combinations. For complete results of any combination shown, or other roquiremonts, contact your LITHONIA/0H1-TEK rnprosontative. I 1 TAA 1 503 LAMP: 15° ow II High Pressure Sodium Lamp toted 16.000 Lumens TAA 200E LAMP:200 watt High Pressure Sodium lamp rated 22,000 Lumens L' T..,Sego.,N•. *alum607 P••ttondlo*alum based en 20'mounting height Tim Popoff Ns.10900 Footeandlo valves bnood on 20'mounting height y": 3 •. INITIAL FOQTCANOLES FLUX p191Rt0Un071 INITIAL FOOTCANDLES RN ournaUT1oU L1 2��- DOWNWARD LODNS ♦Or LAMPS 2,MIN w �',� c0wTl 6LRD LUMENa 'a OF LAMPS 1 1 ■.. MONT 6.7e0 42 3 . ' 1 ,■■ )7 asoa o.000 74] ,• raONr e.714 10 7 0 �,���■� TOTAL I4U0 71 0 ®-Lf1��'t_,�.� aIR 0.444 74] • TOTAL 14.000 0t.0 1 ! ' .11111 • .: -r :`� 11� . ■. COEPFICeIAgo7U1t'0An n . 8 , / f Rmem eoearlClENT/of t/TLLfjATIOp E �r 3 iiilliiillil 0.4�.� 3-JIMMISW/.. a0..- - ' g 0■..�■■ g a3• • 4 111!!! 1 2 3 4 5 6 024:t/� MI Irma 1 OiSTANCE N U:d1i07 COUNTLYO onions 6iDTANeg IN WITS OF 1001OSTIN0141IM0 02 Y0YIm.0 AMMOCOAa0CTI3NMCTO. a1, �•�• ,� -. �MI-.. 0.1 i1..•.. mew,w r4 taw m no comm.WW1 IrAY1fy,RN ftwaf 0v Nu cwuctvo ycseq I - 16 a 17• HOTS:Comecon Rectos air.•1.30 I 24 it ' 00 for 1001N,Multiply by.50 0 1 2 3 4 S 24 h.• 0. 0 1 2 3 4 S To it st MUIR S0=TN ammo W 1WI.Ir4.0 NxrO1173 20 ft.• .71 MAMA MUara W 1:0U5,70•OMit.T11 1 • . .a..m........ i • i , TAA 2505 LAMP:250 watt High Prouuro Sodium lamp rated 30,000 lumen, 4 TAA V p�L L ®®S LAMP:400 waft High Prostate Sodium rated 50.000 Lumcros Teti Repoli No.10025 Poatcondlo values bond on 30'mounting height Toot aoprt No.10115 Pootcondlo values ba,od on 30'mounting height l 1 .. INITIALFOOTCANDLES FLUX 03TR1 R1OtI INITIALFOOTCANOLES FLUX OISTR10UTto74 2�� -t �1■..e DOWNWARD LUIEHS •:OF LAMS 2 !UrtI OOWN\ARD LUMENS •.OF LADS nowt 13.090 463 a mil FRONT 77.130 407 TOTAL 3,TOO 75 11 I \�11 11111111 REAR 0.010 775 `,�.,�■� RFnn 14710 707 0 TOTAL 22.740 770 Ali-vol. 11111111 $ T 51 ''I�i1.■ ,q£� i- /• coapp+civas of ui,c*no:4. N � r 1 " Co2FFtcs,ns OF UTILIZATION Ellimmii a 2- ! r�■. 09 1001,tortlialiiii .. a 0.6NE-s��.� iii1 - O.S - - / I4p1T••� _ ..aa 4 ■■.■■■ D.4 I a �.■■�■ o0.4 .a�� . 8 0.3 -ctteerss•N d $ . . - 0 1 2 3 a 5 0 ,/�- DISTAP.CE Cl was OF mama HEIGHTS 02 t• rr 0 DISTANCE W UNITS OF MUFITMO KE1GHTS 0 • 0$ ffalnlT•IO.raonTccan0CTro1I t6CT00 0.1 • NaVNTIHGinIa.v coaeecfwp.,a, a g,, III���,� tt1YN{(TaNrt l(7nt ntDc•H•eo4e 1•m1 (IIuI1,41,IM fe.•N 61a.,mwIo 1o,o.I O �'.-..- .34 n.• .7e 0 1 2 3 a g 36n 133 33h.• A2 Tal1'RR=eADTHINORTeWuouNrwomoors 30Ir . r0 0 1 2 3 4 S TAA QQ 30 It N® p{� �+�J Q� �p�p'� (t�RMLnS(1�NOMp,U¢1G�TeW UOtMTIgGIlPMre TAA 1 0005 LAMP: 1.000 wail High►scouts Sodium toted 140,000 Lumen 1 L CTRICM�t C 1ARACTER ISTICS Taw Repast No.167173 Pooteandie values based on 40'mounting height WM CUOSIE4T ►OIMASY 11316:82 • _ PRIMARY (AMPS) 0807OUT INPUT FACTOR INITIAL FOOTCANOLE9 FLUX OiSTROUTtoN WATTA00/0AUAST VOLTAOM START/QiOR. VO0TA00 WATTS (%) U a V•LMc7 LI MIPM ?^`"■■ rRavrRO z maws •.of 7426 LAWS 10 1.13/I.95 W - i 240 I.13/ .OS ice 150 N&RIFF 240 1.05/ .72 192 Ill ca• 4%••12% awl. 0�\,1," �■■ _ TOTAL 103.4404 77.3 277 .Scv 2 222884 rim f !' ■ 120 1.35/2.22 90 _ 208 .I19/I.20 136 200 Auts•Ds;)uiolr 240 .70/1.11 100 243 SO* •10%••10% pI -, f.■ CO¢FFtnM E30FURlCATroN 277 .67/ .90 •35/ .36 20t Bpi 2= a0 400 203 MIIII i..i,r4..: OA0.5 120 1.a0/2.79 SO 3 ���. 5a �, Mom 200 1.00/1.60 156 8 4 .�■.� 290 Au1e•tpvlafr 240 IH)/1.34 100 200 90• • 10%••to% g g.3 rRAO 277 .71/1.30 203 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 400 .it/ .69 360 tX3111/4 E04LOITS07noura1140NEHi1TT8 °a 120 2.02/4.30 00 So r•o1.rr.G NOWT CO.Rtctg.r4c•00 q, 70t 1.50/2.10 19s Ireaae,NNIn.A•r cw,•cea.r4cN.i 400 AuN•Roprbrr 240 1.36/2.1! 00 403 00. • 10%••10% 2.h.•1.27 277 1.10/1.t6 2001 ' 44 h.• .oi 0 1 2 3 0 5 dap .75/I.07 tea �sa h.• .M of/MAI MOM Mr4m5°POW j,m r..tt,,s 120 tabs/0.20 90 04 203 . 4.60/5.20 156 n. fi: � LIT OMA .1.Avt►Oo9ut.ter 240 4.00/4.60 ,t0 (000 90• • 10%••10% " f• v x 400 2.00/2.0 360 , t 4'" HI-TE�+A � ,� 1 Tostad to current 1E5 and NEMA standards undo,atEbdlzsd laboratory conditions.Various operawtg INDUSTRIAL/OUTDOOR UGHTING factors can cause dtttotenc.s pontoon laboratory dote and actual field measurements.Ormen.ton.end P.O.SOX72•CRAWFOROSVILLE.INDIANA47833•USA•nar;102.1837.ltLEX272392(Hi.CRAW) SpocIIIC0lfone IS(his cElalog are based on the most currant evadable dill end Oro aUD)eci IS change. '•A S m+anatuA LfOMwo am dawn Rational Senna mounter SPECIFICATIONS Ciri OF RENTO 1 TA A •HOUSING-Rugged, heavy-gi lightweight h, U raluminum housing. Rectilinear shape, internally j seam welded corners for weathertight integrity. ry EPDM one-piece, continuous-gasketed, extruded. ae-' JUN 1 i 1 aluminum door frame with impact-resistant 100/150/200 Lis/ tempered glass lens. Extruded aluminum arm for } �, 1G/ZONING DEPT. 250//�0011000'I pole or wall mounting. Standard dark bronze finish !"T with eleven optional architectural colors. HIGH PRESSURE •OPTICS-Unique one-piece hydroformed reflector. , PRESSURE RE Multi-faceted, segmental design with three- W SODIUM dimensional parabolics for precise light control. L' -y SODIUM •BALLAST/ELECTRICAL SYSTEM-High power �'� r factor ballast, factory tested for reliable operation. - i `'�. D Electrical components are isloated from the optical chamber to provide excellent heat control and long . . ,-L,S, ballast life. Removable power door for ease of / installation/replacement of electrical components on medium and large housing. Positive locking i disconnect plug. of w eNoNs• / � •LISTING-U.L. listed suitable for wet locations. EPA(Includes teij°' Width Depth Nouexl0 Mt.Am,) In-Cm In-Cm In-Cs, 1031501200W 160L 1En,' 21.53.3 15.301 71/4.184 15 to 50 Ft.Mounting oe2m+ ii235741003W f 2em ua 2 0 10 .207 initial Lumens 9,500-140,000 •For MA dapllq a 11,7 06m.from stove viuea. Lamp Life 24,000 Hrs. ORDERING INFORMATION The luminaire catalog number guide below illustrates the variations available and establishes the components to build a catalog number for ordering purposes.To use,select the wattage,mounting,voltage and options for your requirements,then transfer the designations to the appropriate blocks.Accessories should be ordered as separate line items. TYPE— TAA • • •LIT . WATTAGE OPTIONS WATTS WEIGHT DESIGNATION ✓ SUFFIX DESCRIPTION lbs/kg -HS House Side Shield 100 19/8.6 100S IT: • -SF Single Fuse(120,277V) 150 (55v) 20/9.1 150S "-' -DF Double Fuse(208,240,480) 200 22/10.0 200S C , -PER/PE NEMA Twist-Lock PE(120,208, 250 24/10.9 250S 1:7 240V) + 400 39/17.7 400S -PER/PE7 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(277V) + 1000 53/24.1 1000S -PER/PE4 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(480V) + MOUNTING -PER NEMA Twist-Lock PE DESIGNATION ..• (Receptacle Only) (Square Pole) SP 12 -DM© Architectural Color,Medium Bronze (Round Pole) RP 12 El Architectural Color,Sand Stone (Wood Pole or Wall) WW 12 -DCB Architectural Color,Black(Semi-Gloss) VOLTAGE -DCC Architectural Color,Capri Blue Optional Mounting DESIGNATION✓ -OCA Architectural Color,Aztec Tan (Mast Arm)' MA C -DCX Architectural Color,Garnet (Degree Arm Arm)* DA 12P [' 200 0 -DCZ Architectural Color,Citation Gold (Degree Arm Wood Pole or Wall) DA 12W p 240 -DCW Architectural Color,White(Semi-Gloss) •Not available 100,150 and 200W units. 277 -DCG Architectural Color,Gray CD ACCESSORIES 480 ❑ -OCO Architectural Color,Ocher Tenon Mounting Slipfitter is ordered as separate line -DCN Architectural Color,Natural Aluminum item Important with this accessory,an RP 12 or optional + Includes Receptacle and Photocontrol.Photocontrol DA 12P mounting arm must be ordered on the fixtures. Shipped as separate item and must be field installed. Tenon 1 2 2 3 3 4 NOTE:For more details,see options and accessories sheet C-O A. Size fixture fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures For color reference,see color guide sheet DC. at 180° at 90° at 120° at 90° at 90` 241(0.D. 12.190 12.280 12-290 12-320 12-390 12-490 2,4"0.D. T3490 T3-280 13-290 T3-320 T3-390 T3-490 4" O.D. 14-190 74-290 T4-290 T4-320 T4-390 T4-490 NOTE:For more details,see options and accessones sheet C•O.A JOB NUMBER 4 Stewart Reynolds APPROVAL STAMP ,+',,,;::,2 CONTRACTOR SALES , JOB NAME l-- 1.ae'::"_ :.a;�e, BELLEVUE ltlrrr✓ m C 455-2110 LOCATION S- the Lighting Fixture Co saivinommummi n, ♦a uT�I� SEATTLE _ Showroom Sales 222-2nd Ave - G/85 1I11W��"777 SEATTLE Commerdel/Adm mistretion•222-2nd Ave. 622A736 L YNN WOOD 778 5611-196th S.W. - 1124 PARKWAY PLAZA - 17780 S°uthcenter Park 7812°- 575-0460 TAA S - 12828 N.E.Ball.Red.Rd. TACOMA 6770 S.Sprague Ave. - 455.2110 EVERETT - 1811 Hewitt Ave - 475.8730 252-4151 PHOTOMET,'"liC DATA The charts below provide the mot useful data from photometric team of specific I®mp/luminaire combinations. For complete results of any combination shown, or other requirements, contact your LITHONIA/HI-TEK representative. TAA 1 50S LAMP: 150 watt High Pressure Sodium Lamp rated 16,000 Lumens , TAA 200S LAMP:200 watt HiOh Pressuto Sodium Lamp rated 22,000 Lumenf ,�;` , T.,I aop..,Ne.to a7 Foatoondlo values based on 20'mounting hoight Test deport No.16900 Footcandiu voluos based on 20'mounting height .u]{ INITIAL FOOTCANOIF.S FLUX DISTRIBUTION INITIAL FOOTCANDLES FLUX DISTRIBUTION 2 2-d-- ' DOWNWARD LUMENS %OF LAMPS DOWNWARD LUMENS •.OF LAMPS t PROM e,766 c7] 1 FROM 0.314 3E.7 RIlAL 4.685 79] mop L 6.440 69 0 S ac®�j®'Z'� TOTAL 11.43E 716 TOTAL 14,960 68.0 0 y 4 I u! .! 0 9 2 i 909 //Q T I COCFFtCICNT9 OF UTILIZATION j' ,COEFFICIENTS OF UTILIZATION g aIII0.5 S 0.5 - 3NOREAM-T^". 3 . O 0.3 ECART, FIOWT d omrii � -41 O 1 2 3 4 S 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE IN UNITS OF MOUNTING HEIGHTS T'. DISTANCE IN UNITS OF MOUNRNG H210NT9 I40UtvrNW M8a1HTCOARICTION MC7011 0.1 ` �• MOUNTING HEIGHT CORRECTION FACTOR 0.1 ,7 r:' IMUIIiV'V Ina Ic level by IS,ca,rotl10.14110.1 IMum94y casts level Ry rr MI caoolKf fits?) , lb I1 Corm :Non HOTS:Co :tlen Factor 34 h.•1. 14 h ' 69 for 100W,Multiply by.50 0 1 2 3 4 5 24 H.• .69 w 0 1 2 3 4 5 3o it . 31 TRAVERSE Y.9oTNIM UNITS OF MOUNTING HEIGHTS 2S h.• .31 TRAYS/13S WIDTH RIU#7l Of 1201.I11T840 HEIGHTS • IAA 250S LAMP:250 watt High Pressuro Sodium Lamp rated 30,000 Lumen TAA 400S LAMP:400 watt High Protium Sodium rated 50,000 Lumens Test Report No.16824 Foatcandio values based on 30'mounting height Toot Deport No.16513 Footcandlo values based on 30'mounting height ., INITIAL FOOTCANDLES FLUX DISTRIBUTION INITIAL FOOTCANDLES FLUX DISTRIBUTION 2 v s DOWNWARD LUMENS I •.OF LAMPS ' 2 w , DOWNWARD LUMENS •.OF LAMPS 1 FRONT 13.890 46 3 'i 1 1I ,.'.'"'l1 1 FROM 23.150 46 3 0 REAR 8.830 ,193 = 0 A�11, REAR 14.750 79 3 V MA TOTAL 22.740 73 B 7 TOTAL 77 900 73 0 3 2 1 3 .2 .1 2 7 w•.m' ......... ) y COEFFICIENTS OF UTILIZATION, , f COEFFICIENTS OF UTILIZATION •(E,Frf9,,, t mamma 0.6 t r ' �■ 0.6 W Allifft_ ,... reONl W �� •0.5 IrODNi�"wiN . GI9 ASexeF.nepu tsv a lea 8 4III " oa-- .tARw�en.eva O 1 2 3 4 5 6 02 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 , `{ 0.2 DISTANCE Ill UNITS OF MOUNTING KEIGIti2 • DISTANCE IN UNITS OF MOUNTING HEIGHTS .J 'W2UNTIWO HIIOHTCCRRICTIONFAC TOR i 0.1 l. MOUNTIHO HEIGHT CORRECTION FACTOR �W1III1 0.1 •944Np47 tlN le NM by rotaooflM.ean lYlwl NullIply Me lc 4vol bylbeco,rsct,anlYlarl V 26 h..1.33 1 33 .311 h.• .76 0 1 2 3 a 5 74 I, , 70 0 1 2 3 4 5 33 h.• .62 TRAVERSE YROTH er won Of MOUNTINGIIEIGHTS 1011 07 TRAVERSE WIDTHIMUM/7S CF MOUMTING H£1GNTS TAA l 130pS LAMP: 1,000 waft High Pressure Sodium rated 140,000 Lumens ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS Toot Report No.1670E Footcandle values based on 40'mounting hoight LW@ CU97611i PRIMARY rOWEk c - - •- PSLMARV (AMPS) D0O7OUT INPUT FACTO@ REOUL*TICN INITIAL FOOTCANOLES FLUX DISTRIBUTION WATTAOO/EALLAST VOLTAGE START/OPW. VOLTAGE WATTS (%) UNE V a I3Jl49 LUMENS • DOWNWARD LUMENS •.OF LAMPS 120 2.00/1.65 96 900 1.15/ .95 166 1••'"1 �i FRONT 37.426 41 0 1i0 H9•14i9 940 1.00/ .93 192 ISO 90+ + 59.•4.195E REAR 31,063 365 277 .05/ .72 222 D •, TOTAL 100,489 773 r 460 .SO/ .49 ae4 1 6 2 i S .9 120 1.95/9.29 90 906 .60/l.30 196 200 Aura-S 5oiofof 940 .70/1.11 10 245 90• ♦10%••10% COEFFICIENTS OF UTILIZATION 977 .67/ .96 205 0.6 deo �.30/ .56 360 & 0.5 •�- 120 L00/2.75 90 e .- 200 1.00/1.60 156 3 r 0.4 ����// 250 Aut.-Regulator 240 .90/1.38 150 300 90+ 4 10%••10% 0.3. t�frl 977 .76/1.20 209 mi 111 460 . .36/ .69 360 O 1 2 3 4 5 G 0.2��yEEFy .. - DISTANCE INUYIITSOFICOUNTIFIGHEIGrITS F`,' III120 9.02/4.30 t.56/2.&0 90 34 I401p1INGHTIGHT CORRECTION FACTOR w O. ` 900 IS6 Ise9.yfro,mIt hv.l by lt®u'..CnOn c loolat u aim 400 AwO e- oyularca 240 1.36/1.15 too 465 9M . 10%••10% 277 1.19/1.06 206 . 36 N.•1.2; 0 1 2 3 4 5 480 .75/1.07 360 . 48 h.• .69 TRAVERSE WIDTH .IIA6rs OFUatMTOK]HEIGHTS os h.• .69 120 5.00/9.20 90 6.. 205 4.60/5.30 156 l �f ® ��pEy 1000 Aetwia0uteter 240 4.T10/4.6A 100 1090 90+ • 10%••10% • �+e 4 Jr /TIT /,,�,sl✓8A 277 3.50/d.00 20i . ` aril.. t�F !!J/TT'Sr 417 • 400 1.00/2.30 360 EKT * ITT Tested to currant IES and NEMA standards under stabilized laboratory conditions.Various operating I IId�UST IiAt.�OLJ TD063A 1 111TI�!G factors can cause differences batsmen laboratory data and actual field moasurements.Dimensions and P.O.BOX72•CRAWFOROSVILLE.INDWJA47033•USA•lI7< speci specifications in this catalog aro based on the most current available data and aro subject to chango. +302.1837•IELEX 2rzaH2(HI•CRAW) et.ITHONIA LIGHTING 2/85 Divisio TAA S n National Serve Industries r- 4y V V • e, ,,..„. • , , • • y,• . A../ .• • K I. t - -- : e•-• t M' x N 40°35'18"W 1 '1 �` I' r. , 72.82 I I • { _t ,. 1 I : ,!4. \ -iop .S; I c )' je/ D , ;•'. • •• i i s 0�' ova o 4'^ I.,, ,:,:: ,,,, y • w . -.• op i / . 4'17; 4)-..76%). N\ 0. --/ 0 y„t„ . ' k s / \O�. • �1 ® Os. . rS� w \o 0 . A• '' .,440" �' ° / 4. ,1 sa: /Ji t�/ .::4 1:././t�. , I, e' • .,,,,_1:.,•.1.-44 t•'''''''0'''''0 . av� • �a �JFr ,,/' . ,, LOT• 40 r : . g� w }R. N4I°07'29W(D) ,A.,./ / �4 �, - 100.00(D) p.fig. : • ' OQ '1' 48°52.33I (D) •9 0 0Sk, ., GO00(D ,,„,, il f-:''Al'.' ,' �� Iir,i, 2) Iv N, • iSt p' fPJ LOT 4 � 4 V, ORIGINAL INTERIOR LOT LINES e® •? } ORIGINAL & FINAL LOT LINES • I N 2 64.40' _ ° - FINAL`INTERIOR LOT'LINES • ' •,•a ------- EASEMENT LINES {�. (100) TAX LOT NO. ';'`, • •5> _'4 cl• NOTE: BEARINGS AND DISTANCES FOLLOWED BY CD) '' ARE AS CALLED OUT ON DEEDS. r .,S' pROPO ,ED . v., I 41�, -•\/3,0, ,,t 0 / :0 _iv 447 14 , ____ ____ - ---- n 1 p ,� 1 :2°73:.5°82. E _ - 1154'——IN cpu;co N435'18"W \I- 1 �'0ILi i t Z N 00 r1 I 'Gail I CO 0. / N- It N awl t I ai MI itt �Dc Q1 I wl N �� ' 0�`oo. oo�� 27o I i � I / (p`-�/,6��(j, 0 Sr I I • .0 9c O �4tDt '�S ,I ,r!- kl 1 / p0P F �9s 4 o0. iz t��l 7 'b < 2h�•' ! �° 'LF O c\?-1,-igoo s �� % _tu pO p 1 10 ppO�,� �- 9 A ,,�14.00' LOT 3 1, • �/pJ COJ // �'h �� 89,502 S.F. 47. s-• ;v¢,"�Off• 6 2.0155 Ac. "A0� 9`S D°�°� 3V,4 N 1°000(D(D) po 4' C`-•'- 48°52'3I E(D) d- GV, 0 0 .i.e60.00(D) ti �A scD 31 M a ti� �� 1)_ •6, 2 LOT 4 It 4 ORIGINAL INTERIOR LOT LINES rod N2°II�57"W ► ORIGINAL 13 FINAL LOT LINES 64.40' ' .41 2 FINAL INTERIOR LOT LINES ---- ---- EASEMENT LINES (`00) TAX LOT NO. , `/- NOTE: BEARINGS AND DISTANCES FOLLOWED BY "(D)" ARE AS CALLED OUT ON DEEDS. N 8c pR 0PoEO . I ry_. % - -654-451 15, ��. I G.R. (BOB) PARROTT, P.E. ,°- Consulting Civil, Traffic and Transportation Engineering March 26, 1987 i 1 CITY OF RENTON - - - Environmental Review Committee Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 . SUBJECT: RAMAC, INC. SELF-SERVICE a STORAGE/OFFICE/RESTAURANT/HOTEL COMPLEX Gentlemen: . The purpose of this letter is to supplement data submitted to the y City of Renton dated October 28, 1985, concerning traffic. generation and turning movements relative to the office and self-service storage complex. • . . .., a- -e> ,a Neglecting the self-service storage facility, the developer originally anticipated constructing a 60,000 square foot office complex which, according to ITE trip generation data, would yield the following traffic demand volumes: _. _ A.M. Peak Hour In 112 A.M. Peak Hour Out 21 P.M. Peak Hour In 16 ' P.M. Peak Hour Out 82 The new proposed development involves 40,000 square feet of office space, 3,900 square feet of restaurant, and a 115-room hotel complex. According to ITE trip generation rates, as published in Land Use Codes 310, 710, and 832, copies of which are attached hereto, the anticipated generated vehicular trip ends from the proposed new land use are as follows: A.M. Peak Hour In .. 273 A.M. Peak Hour Out 100 • P.M. Peak Hour In 91 . P.M. Peak Hour Out 113 1029 Market Street Building•Suite A•Kirkland,Washington 98033•Moe:(206)828-4266,Kirkland•Home:(206)488-9460,Bothell S • City of Renton Page 2 It is obvious from the ITE trip generation rates that the new proposal will generate and attract more traffic than the proposed office complex referenced in the October 28, 1985 report. The developer at this time has completed the channelization improvements required along the Maple Valley highway relative to ingress and egress to the proposed complex. Level of service calculations result in what appears to be a level of service for ingress and egress movements to the proposed complex off of the Maple Valley highway, no matter what is developed, because of existing traffic volumes on the Maple Valley highway. Again, referring to the October 28, 1985 report, adoption of the now-constructed channelization improvements on the Maple Valley highway, and the proposed right-turn in and right-turn out only conditions from the complex onto Northeast Third Street will tend to minimize any adverse impacts on both arterial roadways. We believe that construction of the proposed project, incorporating traffic considerations contained herein and in the referenced report of October 28, 1985, will result in no significant impact to existing traffic characteristics on the adjacent-arterial streets and highways; - _-- If you have any questions or desire any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Yours truly, . • lei G. R. Parrott, P.E. /dr Attachment SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type hotel 1TE Land Use Code 310 Independent Variable--Trips per Room Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 10.5 13.4 9.1 5 191 Peak A.M. Enter 0.58 Hour Between Exit 0.29 475 of - 7 and 9 Total 0.85 1.18 0.61. iii inn Adjacent P.M. Enter 0.36 i Street Between Exit 0.37 1111 475 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0.73 1.04 0.47 7 9 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Exit of Total 0.90 1 iii6 ram734 Generator P.M. Enter Exit -- = =Total n_ .7 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 4 234 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends q 198 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0.61 1.06 0.42 3 182 Source Numbers 4, c, A?, 11, 55, 72 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates . Date: 1975 • SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type _._g_e_eral Office Building ITE Land Use Code 710 Independent Variable—Trips per 1,000 Gross Square Feet Average a Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies VariableiStudy Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 12. 30 43.9 3.6 35 2 33 Peak A.M. Enter 1.86 3. 3 1. 3 8 210 Hour Between Exit 0. 35 1.0 0. 1 8 210 of 7 and 9 Total 2. 32 .5,9 1.2 25 150 Adjacent P.M. Enter __I1 i I _ Street Between Exit 1.36 2.6 0.7 4 125 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 2.20 6.,_4 0.8 _2 .. _ 12 _ -. Peak A.M. Enter 1 . 86 . 3,3 1.3 8 210 JNour - E 0-35 }1 .0 0_1 8 210 of Total 2_32 5-9 1 .2 25 15n Generator P.M. Enter 0.27 n_7 0. 1 4 1 25 r Exit 1 -36 • 2.6 0 .7 4 125 — -- -- - = -- Total -_ • • Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 3 34 8 9 1 0 13 81 Peak Enter _ 0 19 0 2 0.1 2 88 • • Hour of Exit 0 16 0.2 0 1 2 AR Generator Total 0 ry50 2.2_._. 0 7 11 R1 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends . Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers 2, 5, 19, 20, 21, 51, 53, 54, 72, 88, 89, 92, 95, 97 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: . 1975, Rev. 1979 . . • SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type High Turnover, Sit-Down Restaurant ITE Land Use Code 832 Independent Variable-Trips per 1,000 Square Feet Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 164.4 551.2 47.9 9 c 7 Peak A.M. Enter _ .- Hour Between - Exit P? , •__ of 7 and 9 Total* 47.5 63.5 24.0 7 3 1 Adjacent P.M. Enter 9.9 17.3 7.6 3 11 7 Street Between Exit 4.0 10.3 3.2 3 11.7 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 10.5 38.7 3.0 11 A 8 3 . Peak - A.M. Enter 10.1 11.9 6.6 4 9.6 Hour Between Exit 5.5 20.8 1.4 A 9.6 --- of 12-1 P.M. Total 15.7 75.0 c.1 19 7.2 Generator P.M. Enter _0 17 8 11 7 8 2 Between Exit 9.2 71 7 68 1 8.2 s 6 and 7- " Total- 22.2- 39.0 18.0 - - 3 - 8.2 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 67.8 105.2 62.4 2 9.7 Peak Enter • Hour of Exit Generator Total 10.0 13.2 7.0 6 10.9 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 39.0 40.0 32.4 2 9.7 ., Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator - Total 6.9 8.8 4.6 6 10.9 Source Numbers 2, 4, 5, 72 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates • Date: July Mc • _. . *Represents two restaurants which apparently cater to breakfast patrons. •• . • '' ' .. �.01. %ot io, ri-uct'or ,r, r.c. ' . 1 1 Cons .:rig Civil, Traffic and Transpodalior r.::.gineering ,; October 28, 1985 City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Renton City Hall 4 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 t SUBJECT: Ramac, Inc. Self-Service Storage/Office Complex 1 Gentlemen: M 7 The purpose of this letter is to supplement data submitted to the . City of Renton dated 12/22/82 concerning traffic generation and turning movements relative to the proposed office complex, and 1, b data submitted 1/3/83 regarding left tur a storage lame requirements on the Maple Valley Highway into the proposed site. Copies of this data are attached hereto. . Vehicle trip generation data utilized in this analysis was derived from the Institute of Transportation 'Engineers Trip Generation Manual, published in 1983, specifically for ITE Land Use Code 710 for General Office Buildings and Land Use Code 151 for Mini-Warehouses. Copies of these published rates are also attached hereto. Discussions were held with staff members of the City of Renton and W. S. DOT in order to determine existing and projected traffic volumes on both the Maple Valley Highway and N. E. Third . : Street. Existing average daily traffic volumes on N. E. Third 1029 Markel Street Building•Suite A•Kirkland,Washington 98033.Ot lco:(206)828-4266,Kirkland•Homo:(206)488-9460,Bothell -:�:_ :1 ' 'L; YY'l- ,4,- _A. ,,,,d, ,,,,, . r , 4 City of Renton -2- October 28, 1985 / Street amount to about 32,000 vehicles a day, with 15,300 being S• eastbound and 16,700 being westbound. Existing average daily traffic volumes on the Maple Valley Highway amount to around 23,300, with approximately 11,800 westbound and 11, 500 eastbound. 1 • 1 Generated vehicular trip-ends from the proposed sites are as Lti r follows: IJ. A. Mini-warehouse site (Land Use Code 151) . gi Average daily trip-ends = 86 la A.M. peak hour trip-ends = 5 It P.M. peak hour trip-ends = 9 1 B. Proposed office building • 5 A.M. peak hour trip-ends = 112 trips in; 21 trips out '; P.M. peak hour trip-ends = 16 trips in; 82 trips out , 1 1 It is obvious from the ITE Trip Generation data and observations i make by the author, for mini-warehouse installations, throughout 1 the Seattle metropolitian area that the impact from such installations and projects can be considered neglible. Traffic volume activity in relation to mini-warehouse installations occurs before or after peak hour volumes or occurs on weekends. From a traffic engineering standpoint, the traffic volume impacts are therefore centered around the proposed office complex. Capacity calculations have been performed and have resulted in • City of Renton -3- October 28, 1985 what appears to be a level of service "E" for ingress and egress to the proposed office complex off of the Maple Valley Highway, assuming no other access is allowed. Capacity calculation forms are attached hereto. It is proposed that access onto N. E. Third Street be restricted to a right turn in and right turn out only operation from the proposed site. Existing traffic volumes on N. E. Third Street, during the peak hours, definitely preclude any other turning movements taking place. Full access from the Maple Valley Highway, plus right in and right out only from N. E.. Third Street will allow the office building and storage facility patrons access to and from the proposed site without having to cross heavy, peak hour traffic volumes. The self-service storage facility, by its very nature, will be secure and as such, the driveway around the periphery of this site can also be secured, thus preventing short-cutting of traffic from Maple Valley Highway to N. E. Third Street and vice' versa. The proposed scheme would allow eastbound vehicles desiring to enter the site from the Renton area, to utilize N. E.Third Street and turn right into the site, thus avoiding any turning conflicts. with major traffic volumes westbound towards the Renton area on . the Maple Valley Highway. Likewise, westbound traffic from the City of Renton -4- October 28, 1985 Maple Valley area, destined to the proposed site, would turn freely from the Maple Valley Highway right into the site. During the P.M. peak hours the reverse would be true, eastbound traffic would turn right out of the site onto N. E. Third Street and meld with the existing traffic volumes eastbound. Westbound traffic could turn right onto the Maple- Valley Highway from the site and meld with the minor traffic volumes heading towards the Renton area. In summary, it is recommended that right turn in, and right turn out only, be facilitated along N. E. Third Street, subject to security conditions such that only the office building and warehouse patrons are accommodated and short-cutting from N. E. Third Street to Maple Valley Highway or vice versa by the general public is prevented. This will result in a higher level of service at the entranceway from the Maple Valley Highway and likewise should not jeopardize the existing level of service along N. E. Third Street. Left turn lane storage facility calculations from the Maple n o Valley Highway into the proposed site as submitted 1/3//83 appear to be adequate. Left turn storage facilities under the proposed concept from N. E. Third onto the site will not be required since we propose a right turn in and right turn out only concept. • F (cA City of Renton -5- October 28, 1985 11 Construction of the proposed project, incorporating the traffic 1 r routing considerations contained herein will result in no _ significant impact to existing traffic characteristics on the adjacent arterial streets and highways. 3 If you have any questions or desire any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Yours truly, .......... O. R. (Bob) Parrott, P. E. /ac Attachments • • . 0 • ` r1 1r 1; n SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Mini-WarPhnILRP ITE Lend Use Code 151 Independent Variable—Trips per _____].,.000 rrnse Sq.uarP FeA¢ ^ . B .1.2 a--Airsa • Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies VariablelSfudy Aver,::ge Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 2.8 ,4 .4 1,.7 6 61 .7 Peak A.M. Enter • Hour Between Exit _ . of 7 and 9 Total 0.17 0.27 0.06 6____ 61 .7 Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit Traffic 4 and 6 ' Total j).29 1).42 _0-1A 6 61 .7 Peak A.M. Enter . Hour Exit - .- `4 _. - of Total n-.2 6 n.44 n_19 6 61 7 . -• Generator P.M. Enter • Exit Total 0.32• 0.5 0 6 61.7 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends , 2.9 3.5 _1.7 6 , 61.7 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total r ,40 0.60 . 0.24 6 4 61 .7 Sunday Vehicle Trip Enda 1.7 2.3 1 .1 6 . 61 .7 •Peak Enter Hour of Exit , Generator Total n_3n n_fin n_19 6 6 1 7 Source Numbers 111 • ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1982 SUMMARY OF TRBP CENERATIA N RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office Building ITE Land Use Code 710 Independent Variable—Trips per 1.000 Grass Square Feet Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies VariablelStudy Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 128 10 43.5 3.6 - 35 213 Peak A.M.- Enter 1, 8 6 3. 1 ` 1. 3 8 210 Hour Between Exit _ 0, 15 10 0 0.1 _ 8 210 , of 7 and 9 Total 2, 12 5.9 1.2 29 150 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0.27 0.7 0. 1 , 4 125 Street Between Exit 1. 36 2.6 0.7 4 125 -.- Traffic 4 and 6 Total s r Peak A.M. Enter 1-86 3. 3 1.3 8 210 Hour Exit n. 15 1 .0 0. 1 8 2]n of Total -3 _ 22 5.9 1 .2 25 _ 15n Generator P.M. - Enter 0.27 n.7 t n.1 _ 4 125 Exit 1 _36 2_6 n_7 4 , 125 . Total 2..20 6 4_. . . 0.8 ,, __- ,.<_ ._ _ 24. _ __ w_122 .... __... Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 3 34 8 9 1 0 13 81 Peak Enter , 0. 19 0.2 0. 1 2 88 Hour of Exit 0 16 0 2 0- 1 2 AR Generator Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers 2, 5p 19, 20, 21,, 51, 53, 54, 72, 884 89, 92, 95, 97 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6--Trip Generation Rates • Date: 1975, Rev. 1979 , II . • • SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office Building GTE Land Use Code l�0 Independent Variable—Trips per Employee Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 1.59 11. 21 2.42 18 446 Peak A.M. Enter 0. 15 0.40 0, 27 1 284 Hour Between Exit 0.06 0.11 0.05 3 284 of 7 and 9 Total 0.59 1.113 0. 36 18 446 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0.0 8 0. 10 0.02 3 , 284 Street Between Exit 0.24 0. 37 0. 23 3 284 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0.57 31-79 • 0.27 1 ft__ Peak A.M. Enter 0. 15 0. 40 0.27 3 284 Hour Exit n,n6 n_11 , 0_05 3 2R4 of Total 0.59 i _k3 n- 36 18 416 Generator P.M. — Enter n n R n_m n n_n 7 3 — 2 8 4 Exit n_24 n-37 n-23 • 3 2R4 Total 0 .57 _79_. _ . 27_ ,, _ . .. _18 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 0 81 2 86 . 0- 30 1 3 336 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0, 4 1 R a 6 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total • Source Numbers • ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975 o Rev. 1979 • • SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office Building ITE Land Use Code 710 independent Variable—Trips per Acre Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies VariablelStudy Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 240.1 299.1 51 20 7-9 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Between Exit • of 7 and 9 Total 19.2 86 9 14 9-2 Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit • •Traffic 4 and 6 Total /^' R C Peak A.M. Enter Hour . Exit of Total - Generator P.M. = -Enter Exit Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter _ Hour of Exit - ^ Generator Total • Source Numbers 19, 88, 89, 92 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6--Trip Generation Rates • • Date: 1979 TRUE JOIST C• e r� FIATIUM • - - MEncEn ISLAND SALES itr`FICE .: r . ••P.O.BOX 580••MERCER ISLAND,WASHINGTON 08040 A/C 208/232.0815 . RAY FIEDLER i a%ME L4)9-2/i/MIY. V4 41 A ri6 i 5 ti 70 e.Y . 1 1 I. 1. . I 1 i 2/a iVrd2L 1417 4 Mkt •1Cf y �//G / � ' . . • I , ,• 'elstne.. Sitith : 1 4piP6 6/2ocss ritz y .64600 4 .ink �nuie 1 ' - '7E: aea s ' - I ! / ® a $ j !, zoo Urt! :OE ' eax /062. ; . llb. OF- ''P OYE— i . 2 "S' 1 ( , ) 252-5990 • 1 ! . !. : : . .* .a.0(411i• e*e;0 t3OLON: 6 1 •. 1:-. • • • :, . I . •.'' ! ! i i • . : i ' BO// 1® �4; 6QX/Z ! - 7S$'• 4P7 ! ' E •: : O/M .577Z ! 3.33x 2440./ = 799' NT: 4 E/ 4& gao. �4Y ,c 357 - 9,5 .Apt°: . ; . : • i 1432.57- ADrst- 3 ASSeige 65% 70,ea -may z 11 . , Some w/ Ampte v ii y : laa . j2 x.04r A.1. 7 4r. Etii = folic• -t'd/e• T' 7D rox.$s4 -11. /- (T ---•,-� 6®/fi/z. =27/02.3 t •_s_ • • POW( LEP' win/•Q/#R. ‘ Z 5rAcit cr bv ri/RALLAux VD° in ta.t12. ... • • 22D09 . . �,, 22Za9 . HARZ Vtf Y ,I/6, Y 2�10 9 - /0/:� r'• • . . Apn NJ /9X) t 24756 ►:BY NW/NAY irEP77 . Jos NAME: _..._: LOCATION: ._...__.-• •_--.. _.....__ __._._..-------•-----..__._.___--- SI IEF.'1 or SAI.F.SMAN: • ._......__ ---_-- f3Y . .' ___. . f)A1f . . .......-:.. • • 'O (�AQarr,�7ilOf 1 ST'lulaii Iv,)19. a 1:v�11 i kJ cry ti/Vl) :. 'd 31: r19 r.! if.t d CZ%U ..iiiiii wij,i5.'a'M VIA.•31C itiJ, O. ; ;5:7_N XIVV . 6o�IZ . • • . 6',I .21 S N 1f-ell-1 AAT'A 1M,f 1 . tee... -�. '.� . ,. 3�, 6�z LI � f ., MIL Lai�1 icv� �... -• \ ' .00,/ - �/ p - ""------� 6o>aaL4., --y ' Clai) . , ,. , • • y -- 'OSZ (--• k Z4. ' C '',A> c7.a:P/i li/ L > ,.Pi '(215,gLI : 2.5r) in _L- • --- •• • 3Vvac'1s'�:T3A11r 42N = S e..L-''/ol 197da G'I fi /SLI =S . • 4j-'- vA 2Le/=4;1 1 '5)I- l•'t'U. — • .:;NQI1 3: r�rrl a.It�r1J C 32/7v'N9iS Yl7 . .LV iv / 9 2 2 s V..771 1.137 2 .21ti1,2?,W1'J Rt fl7Q1 ; 741v 72YyaIVH 7/z0 a :7,31 321'(ViW 9ii- :hc- . ic // - =Lav a Xif11 LfY I�LV1.1[.4 -,-. 1--ivai; -Q./ .L 'i//d `!-fr. '�'r✓/ t'Z/ (Ji ood,1.SV- 'bid • NV 6-L 'Zi /ZLZ • �10(344 ..LW 'WY •c.vd %-t' 'Vy/SZ5 c7i 1nQJd 1.93 Tv:Id. 'rV f 6 / i- h � /11�% l O •r 'y'Yd b' 'a//i/%2 r$t Ai '?iw/c'l - *Z'k SSZ L1 •l)%J 'G•l 1 S1iataL -1-137 I'►iV 6-:: 'a'//o. = 55%XO 'a'//C6- .' S .x.5SZ 11ZI.G`:d'v - '1'v'V OOP' : X 377vA g7dily G1t2IL1/i eo ./b1t iSS1/ • - N41N ' 4.'/( C Z /o5 9GY(/bV 1p 2..;V2 M i•1 ')x0 x iciy' Z?7 :Lay.`i/6 = 4.5.E gSSG .,.a►3/gl..71 r- 'O/y 0662-008( ) UL9 v�.f_1/1V/ :LIV 66•Z =1'4/ Aga�' b'" L/V 3LI Otais UrRUPPUBL'4 1g! i I :jai gGG a •6'L1 A'UJ V.X.Iyi Z9ol >v8 'aS'And ML94 0,P.Z. gy 107. 3�O :i::i %�i/'r�; aaaitnnij ppm &pp$ ::,s'l� • r'i ' v 3?ly e.c / �:cr)0CA' t;`mil./!f S-11.4X- 9:*hcri,f 3 tigrtuck cd' �1 trosp®'`K 91V?1 tY01 ..ria1'1 ,;.i//.,:i.. G;`r.A:11/179 a91d ICI 71P&::/ 3) •• • Adtli—, /J ( 17U/1 . 7,1VAINu 73/p1 41! Z1� V / _ .Qo S • X7 ' OI4di L , Ai3/I/dQ 2h1V1S. _ . . . ,1 .. „ . i. ' i:* 'worms ditusT C APORATION mncER ISLAND i_ p - - v - ,,„ e SALES OFFICE !e. ... . , . ,c..'A .. . ' - P.O.BOX BOO•;Amon ISLAND.WASHINGTON 08040 .. i A : A IX;;fIE 301 MI 5 ;5! • kil • . :. . . il . . .. . • , . , . . P 41 • #1. ittaaleallY Farrib GOOY I , . • 1 . ! . 74 1 A i 1 . I Me elfillayNlif-W—ri 1 I , Will : W11 • i ; 1 . I 1 ! • : I . ; . • , i• , . . I ! 16E,outithi.. :agree argo/Az 1 I1 , ;•14 11111 P 77444eb Ad, levr 711 2..- ' - -56 er.-ce Nal ri .ra/*iv/AA : • • 7-9.ithil. i ; • : 1 . , ! , . . , 5,:. • P44 774ip R ii . Igo, Wag 27 n Wei P • • ! ; • ; f • : i . : • ; I'? ! • ! • 10945 Voigtie NOMA. i : ! • , • f . I 11 1 1 • • • , . . • :•::, • 1 772,4pAri Am. livr6r Ayelato • /377 Arizi2,4 foz- 23 P02 AW, ' 7-..9/14: • 0 .. 1:1'F MAK 73/M0 in A Aittfr.0°°A0 1"agORd2 1400 zr ••g:eif gea NAV,. 4E-4 PA • , . . .• • • • • • Page Wing& AN. r eardA/0 g 7g p ei 2#4. It f fog twat - 7-% demo Rribfe 7114164 *RA 11117-000itto mo iv 0 Age e g/ fieg ANA 44/04. L-f, - . • A . • -4- . -...- g - . 1 ieW Ni &01 JAY gragfigai Mom ,2/1 . !1. . 119Megret t WAX iaeldNg ROMPT-XFPN&taw Laos'Ar • . • UAGVNAttia, Siam ififtgileermAis. • t . A L _ ,, d,: F/6.2. 14 g: /377 gi 0 re ' S AT/7si- 4 4 1 -.._ i nal% Per rems I - logricitts. /76-'0 gr r.... 200 1,-iiR,46 J • 1 .'? -. . • . 1 ' • \.,,ic.......7-9 tillf.res* 2.9/MING . ) • # Snug isr WS WO'feducVsu4 1. LAWS. :• , ' • — -.4. I--,„, . ..., DO * .....------.- --ea ofe• • • . . ile 0.elAd‘ — i 301c% 6 CMS Fbta Lori' Tugg ..—....P.._ 1 • .Its.Alt. 4%41/4 ; . . . . . • H— IVAPtglig . leY MGNWAY 1 ....---4 , , ,1 stteal hccattit 140,41 4 Li( Ae: ‘10 4, rale c•••% airkeie, : . • (----11 X 6 Vely - ' r cfe;ecg% fey (b. etu. D. Mr PC/ 4 N ...., . 4m/$1,14.AfiNE-7-] . .ti - >fp . • • • • 4 • , • --- - - •• a'.. / AAb I h I) 1 • • ---- A ' -Ai .....)Ig ----------- SHEET titA..t. (141fritit,:0* . rilveli — : SALESMAN: ......_____._ . . .. . • - l`..::�'ianalized "T" Intersection Capacity I ..%nation Form rirl u, Intersection I1; Location Plan: Counts: �� ' Pt 1/A£-LEy HWS/ Date /99D -_ Day pike ktia c1 d, A ® Time /7314 PiC'Ng i 11 4 , Control S2 'P" «i me zzovewny Prevailing Speed_ . hourly Demand iliac Volumes from_4 to In Approach A B 7 C --y-- 11 Movement Ar —a AP BL ( lar -3.- .Ce '"'1 Ca /1"" - .Volume (ono 7 9 /333 37 45. pch her Table 11 :10 63 i;i; • 1 Step C flight libra Irum C CR rO . • Conflicting Flows e:Mn 0 %An + A, ® , (from Fig. I) �- + GOO v �D�, , Critical Gap from Table To a Z sec Capacity from Fitt.2 a M .a Mr a•3(d cre v V Shared Lane-See Step 3 • No Shared Lane Demand fl • Ca v to f Available Reserve a Mt-CR a RR . �_ Delay&Level of Service rabble 3) ED Slap 8 tell7Fortm from B Br, Or, Conflicting Floors a Ma a` An + A, - • • (from Fig. 1) + (oO ra �Q� 410 _ Critical Gap from tmble 2 T,a . . •B sec �s T z Capacity from Fig.2 v - - MNo a Me a .3 '0 sta - - . - 7. , -..-,- Demand ea OIL a-..9—piee Capacity Used a 100 Mt/MO)- 2.S It • Impedance Factor from Fig.3 at Po a -90 . . . . • • Available Reserve a Ma-Br.a-ICI-hen Delay&Level of Service Mirk 3) 5410' de/ir 7$ rEn Step 2 WI Urn from C Cc '1 Conflicting Flows n Mn a b Aa+ Ar + Br, + Or a Mom Fig. I) .. A +f +1+/1/1- 2'ev.,a Critical Oop from Table 2 T,to _i_IL sec ' Capacity from Fig.2• Mos a•-3�ate • . ' ' Adjust for impedance MAr.pit Pees M,e_Li..en -, • No Shared Lane Demand a Ct,o pith • . Available Reserve ov ' Me-CI, ma . Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) E3 . . I Shared Lane Demand t3. . Ca+Ct.a Chu,a B Mh , • Shared Lane with Right Torn • (ca+C,) '• • Capacity of Shared Lane. M1,a (C 1IMrl+(CLIRAeI . Mrs.a 58 • Available Reserve a _ Meg-Casa -L4pite . . . . • ' Delay&Level of Servke f ibble 3) /��C:/a4� ® • • Oeeuf Evaluation -rr. li -. '1 t , ,Agnallzed "T" Intersection Capacity allation Form lirl :: ,.:.;, • Intersection Location Plat: ' Counts: /11Aetk.E {/ALLEY /1 iv y Date /9 96 Day Weekda A B Time Am Pe OR "Rl srop L�e-s) 1 I $ ,S4 Vc o�/v�wAy Prevailing Speed 4o ' Hourly Demand Traffic Volumes from_2_to ._-m Control Approach A T. El '7" C "Y . Movement Ar -a Aa -It Br. r Br "" Ce. '61 CR f° .Volume /47Z 50 632 /35 9 !Z pch her Tafirt It i'�'','.yi_ s'bra"v gr '.... .. . Step B Right Toro from C Ca Conflicting Flows©Mn a 1 An + Ar a (from Fig. I) ZS .i. /492. a /5/7.0 Critical Gap from Table 2 T,a 7 0 sec VCapacity Prom Fig.2 m Ma.a Ms" 8C)as Shared Lase-See Step 3 _ No Shared Lane Demand a Ca a Felt Available Reserve a - Ms-Ca faro . Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) ED Step 2 Left Prom B BI. r Conflicting Flows s Ma a Aa + Ar (from Fig. 1) d + /4Q as /54 Z,aa ; Critical Gap from lbbk 2 T,.3 _,2 sec. — = Capacity from Fig.2" a - M,,.n Mg Si /b0 rze - - , _ -- • Demand m Bc- /'a' an Capacity Used a RID(RAJM,)a lez.k 91. Impedance Factor from Fig.3- pow 0.5 • • Available Reserve a Me-®s - 8 rc* • Delay&Level of Service(Table 3) Ye.7/on7 a S al Step 3 [ail Um fans C• Cr, .: Conflicting Flows-Mae SiAa+ Ar + Bs + Br- - (Omn Fig. I) Z Ss+/J+a.+/g .. /7/41. . Critical Cep from Title 2 T," 9.o sec .' ; Capacity from Fig.2- M .- 3 O sea Adjust for Impedatce MN,,x P,a M,a /5 sxa . 'No Shared Lane Demand a Ca- au ' Available Reserve- tot.-CQ- eea Delay df Level of Service(Table 3) [ j i Shared Lane Demand a . Ca+Cs,a Cs.s a Zl Pr► • V Shared Lane with Right Thr •. (Ca+Cs) Capacity of Shared Lane- Mr'a IC./MI)+(CIJM,) Mta a Z 8 ,,,, Available Reserve- Ms,-CI.-_Z pta Delay&Level of Service(Ibble 3) Ve47 I5n9 A-la.ys ® . irs way Overall Evaluation s.fvY.D - ITY OF RENTC-'\ FILE NO(S): SA"-- 064 -81 uiLDING & ZONING DEPARTmtNT '-CA9 81 ru • . .°PNrcO MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application's) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NA 1 FEES �I\Cc cJ 1v C. 0 REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRE S �A_v, b v X ==,S 3 LJ SPECIAL PERMIT* CIT ZIP ED TEMPORARY PERMIT* P 1 G 67gO e7 Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHO T U Q SITE PLAN APPROVAL J SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 2- �` 9 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q . VARIANCE* . From Section: NAME * Justification Required Nti s (-fe . ADDRESS (, SUBDIVISIONS: •I . U G l ( Si--- 301 702.7 Q SHORT PLAT CITY `, ZIP j �/ Q TENTATIVE PLAT I U V4 9� PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE 0 ( R wt./ FINAL PLAT 0 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAM PLAT NAME:RADDRES 0,1-4,a_c_ TyLc . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: (9 . Rdk (nG Q PRELIMINARY CITY � ZIP 0 FINAL ' e-OC 'Y1 ( `/' O.S 2 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 3 I T9? _ 4 19 EJ Residential Q Industrial 5 Commercial n Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 04.U.l:(u.'el 70 D I(&, `tt(k , *Aios-(1 F�' TENTATIVE ED EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONINGPRELIMINARY ,kCQ fir a-/ FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: • Teia 4,ikt-A . LtffC - Q i r yL NUMBER OF SPACES: • o b=4 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: TOTAL FEES - c: ..:...cr ~�`A '(';j I n (1n r- USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMPS Qj Ira Y IV 5 I e� APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: \ � , -1 JUN 1-1 8.7 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: �)� pL® �1 • (L Accepted DU;l,DING/ZONING DC_PT. Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ",- [1, U Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO. Egil Building N, Design Eng. LAJ Fire ki Parks c / Utilities 1,�_b Police Policy Dev. � Traffic Eng. REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). krt-Pet-c,f4- A. AFFIDAVIT I, DP ° S ti 6iot._. , being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the F information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /o1 v--� DAY OF :,, ,,�,A„J , 19�. Ji�,a�4p, LEE /7 .•,c,SION k,. �v,) NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE SaTATE, OF o WASHIN TON, //PRESIDING 9 0 5 *T�T��y ,... a ° °•°.....J°"Cam'f' ;f'� (Name of No ary Public (Signature of Owner) -Pre, ' `,e`' it' • -PID ?<. Cs- (Address) ' (Address) e :'.b 0 .! r'.01-ti 'll 1. :e° .:— 7 • (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Foam #174 Legal description enclosing PARK PLACE site: -- y That portion of NE 1/4 of section 17,. Township 23 North, Range''' �� 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington described as follows: Commencing at the east quarter corner of said Section 17; Thence N 89°' 45' 17" W 1325.83 feet; Thence N 01 ° 11 ' 00" E 252.22 feet to the southerly line of the plat of H. G. White's Monterey Terrace Addition to the City of Renton as recorded in Volume 50 of plats, Page 36, records of King County, Washington; Thence N 89° 45' 17" W along said south line of Monterey Terrace and its projection west 571.27 feet to the northeasterly right—of-way line of State Highway No. 5, also known as "Maple Valley Highway", and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 89° 45' 17" W along said right—of—way 41.43 feet; Thence N 37° 43' 41" W along said right—of—way 148.88 feet; Thence N 02° 11 ' 57" W along said right—of—way 10.00 feet more or less; Thence N 40° 47' 35" W along said right—of—way 557.00 feet more or less, to the southeasterly right—of—way of the "H—Line" on ramp to Primary State Highway No. 1, also known as Interstate Highway No. •405; Thence N 49° 54' 38" E along said southeasterly right—of—way line a distance of 448.54 feet; Thence N 09° 00' 22" W 86.02 feet to the south margin of Old Bronson Way; Thence N 82° 31 ' 50" E 115.84 feet along said south margin to an angle point at the southeasterly margin of Old Bronson Way; Thence N 22° 10' 50" E 78.74 feet along the easterly margin of Bronson Way; Thence S 12° 48' 43" E along an extension of the west line of Lot 16 of Monterey Terrace 190.44 feet to a point of curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 360.00 feet; Thence southerly along said curve to the right 87.97 feet through a central angle of 14° 00' 00"; Thence S 01 ° 11 ' 17" W 287.61 feet; Thence N 88° 48' 43" W 10.00 feet; Thence S 01° 11 ' 17" W 452. 14 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PROJECT NARRATIVE: In developing the site it is the intention of RaMac, Inc. to provide an attractive and capatible grouping of buildings and businesses which will add aesthetic appeal to this prominent approach into, the City of Renton. The site is zoned B-1 which allows for a variety of commercial activity, however, the proposed uses will be a dining establishment, a hotel, and an office building. These three businesses are compatible in nature and it is anticipated that they will support each other economically, and will work very harmoniously together from the traffic and parking perspective. The development of the site will take place in basically two phases. The first phase will consist of the construction of the hotel and restaurant which is anticipated to be completed in the first quarter of 1988. The second phase will consist of the construction of the proposed office building which is anticipated to be completed by the last quarter of 1990. CITY p- N 1 1 3 I 3` OF. R4,,,� ECF: I EUF-O4 -E31 6 © z City of Renton • LU: `��-n�4- �e� . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST rEa SEPt�M Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: PARK PLACE 2. Name of applicant: RAMAC, INC. _ CITY CV MAIN 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: E3 P. 0. Box 653 I� �t Renton , Washington 98057 �,,�� 51981 392-4199 Dan Shane 4. Date checklist prepared: BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 5. Agency requesting checklist: Renton Building Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Phase I Hotel and Restaurant start date - Late 1987 , Phase II Proposed Office Building start date - Mid 1990 I -7. Do you have any plar` )r future additions. expansions. or -\;ther activity related to or connected with proposal? if yes. explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared. directly related to this proposal. Soils reports ,have been previously submitted on this site . 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other } proposals directly affecting the-property covered by your proposal? If yes. explain. No' • 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. N/A , 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal. including the proposed uses-and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to , repeat those,answers on thispage. • The.. total ,site .-covers.,an .area ,of,. 5.. 696 acres: Tt will have mixed -use 'all , of which are compatible with the ',B-T- -zoning. The, site' will have a Hotel , - Resta'urant and Future ' Office.- Building . • 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise'location of your proposed project. including a street address._if any, and section,,'township, and range if known. ' If a proposal would occur over a"range of- area, provide the range 'or 'boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal 'description. • site plan. vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any.plans required by the agency. you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed. plans submitted with any permit applications related to. this checklist. - • The site is located on Maple Valley Highway immediately East of I-405 in Renton , Wa.shingto,n. The. site is' located in the 'N.E. 4 of Section 17 township 23N,• Range 5E in -King County. The property is contiguous with Maple Valley Highway on the South, the North-bound - on-ramp to I-405 on t'he -West ,, Bronson , • Way N. E. on the North and Monterey Terrace on the East . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS • ' 1. EARTH • • a.. . _General description of .the site (circle one); flat. rolling. hilly. steep :. . ' -= slopes, mountainous. other Generally flat with • some slopes. b. What is the'steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 30% to 40% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly. sand.. • :,:gravel..peat, muck)?' If you know the classification of.agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland. , • Compacted glacial ,tile . d. • Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils'in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. ., ' No . - 2 - • • e. Describe th urpose. type, and approximate qi ities of any filling or grading pror d. Indicate source of fill. • A minimum amount of grading will be involved on the site. At the time of construction of the proposed office building excavation will occur for underground parking . f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use? If so. generally describe. V No . g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 60% of the site will be covered . h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: . Rockery retaining structure along with trees and ground cover will be used to control any possible erosion on the site. • 2. V AIR V a. V What types of emissions to the air would result V from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile. odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust will be created during construction whereas auto emissions will be created both during construction and after it ' s completion'. b. Are there any off-site sources Qf emission? =No , • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air. if any: V V None . 3. WATER • a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams. saltwater, lakes. ponds. wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide ,names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. V • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the.described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A - 3 - 4) Will the pror"---,1 require surface water withdrav • or diversions? Give general descr ;on. purpose, and approximately qu; ties if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. . No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. None. - 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) - Describe the source of runoff. (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will be retained in underground CMP retention collectors . The parking lots will also be sloped to provide retention ponds . 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No . - 4 - • , d. Proposed mei es to reduce or control surface, V `nd, and runoff water impacts. if ar6,: • The runoff water will be controlled in collectors as • described earlier . V , 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of'vegetation found on the site: • deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs - V le grass • o crop or grain ' o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush. skunk cabbage. other. o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil..other O other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? V • The only kind of vegetation that will be removed will be some small shrubs and grass . V c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. V Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Rhododendrons , deciduous and evergreen trees or shrubs will be planted through out the site as decribed in the , general design criteria . 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed_on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: " Birds: Hawk. heron, eagle songbird other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring. shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None . C. Is the site part Of a migration route? If so, explain: No . • - 5 - d. Proposed mear-•-76, to preserve or enhance wildlife."-iy; . • The sloped area will be left as it presently exists or will be enhanced by planting shrubs and trees . 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds,of energy (electric, natural gas. oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed-project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing. etc. Natural gas and electricity will: be iced on the site for 'heating , cooling and cooking,. • • b. Would your project affect the potential use of' solar,energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally,describe. .- No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The, construction will conform to he exi'stiIg 'Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health a. , Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe,special emergency services that might be required. ' None. = ' 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: • N/A b. . Noise 1) ' What types of noise exist in the area which may• affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? -. _Traffic noise from I-405 and Maple Valley Highway will have an affect upon the project,. ' • 2) " -What types a"A-levals of noise would be created bu.tr associated with the project on hort-term or a long-term basil or example: traffic. construction. operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise from 7 A.M. to 5 P.M. (Short Term) . 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The existing buffer created by the natural ground cover . 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? • • It is presently vacant land . • b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe. No. • • c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so. what? N/A • e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? B-1 - . f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? B-1 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 200 people j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - 7 - • 1. Proposed mea_. -is..to ensure• the proposal is comp,--Ile Ile with existing and projected lane as and plans. if:any: The site use have been discussed and coordinated with ' the City of Renton Planning Department. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided. if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. .' • N/A . b. Approximately, how many units, if any, would, be,eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle. or low-income housing. None . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/.A • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not. including . antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The tallest structure could possibl{i) be four stories with stucco , concrete, glass and wood materials . ' b. ' What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. if any: A 'general list of design guidelines are, given, .as a ' part of the overall development. • V 11. Light and Glare a. What type of V light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ' Possible sun reflection off of reflective glass. This would occur in the afternoon. b. Could light or glare from the finished project' be a- safety, hazard,or interfere with views? ' No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None V - 8 - ' ' • • . 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A major park area exists just South of Maple Valley Highway . b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. No . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No . b. - Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: - N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Maple Valley Highway adjoins the property on, the South and Bronson Way N.E. adjoins the property on the North. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No. One-fourth Mile . c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project could have approximately 346 parking spaces and would not eliminate any existing parking places . d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. - 9 - A e. Will the project "de (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportati If so, generally describe. ' No . f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See traffic study for the site. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Traffic channeliz"ation on Maple Valley Highway . 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Possibly fire and police protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a: . Circle utilities current! available at the site: electricity, natural gas refuse servic3 elephone sanitary sews)septic system, o er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities,on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Puget Power Washington Natural Gas Renton City Water , Sewer and Garbage Pacific N.W. Bell C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: J/2/eri C• Vann - 10 - 1 #176 11-8-84 - z - . Si6A/ "A " Standard 16" ta • 51 Tiiis Sled iv Be 671941440 . 7b. ME ormhen.;." ALLatsioat ..SO. rearmed' . .' ,...42...Lfas rolv crA1770,450. 14.0.,e4.68, 1 41 1 i I 1— R E 01-13. A U R A HIT %4 <"---° 410 • \ . , r- , r......... 24- • • - Eyead.) To 1541 ' 11SHAitIn 11;n1zK AtclOWIL1 1-1( 47:1-itiEj_t_auirrecurui:c6117, rieic,E, 15icr.ga)kir) ts 4 ITELLcui 3f)3-erapim&E., 7111- IFE::51cAt ttri • e`4))- TPL)M2q1ri-- v1-1 1aEc,. C4 '-1 e;N1407-z- Ei...Lau 0 foo, • 0 1 ~ 11.Zel-Hre' d 1 " i r OLEPR.R E I-",MSDNI. Meiwor — fo' • — GAV15/PQ675145UPPM1-- aaorzziccarkri , •, ‘ \-'. e-1 L . PEP P:;11C giCiiiiN, \C_i: S641-1'co - - INr; iLLUM1N19774,N1 /15 • .L:i.:LD,,,vzoN,NG DEPT. 41."-r ascii/A FLIJOR, LAulps. , r-- E . • . .,:( '',.'c11: c:ii, (71:4)( , i':il I ,'\s 1 II..I;t(!.'S I''Ell% ' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIID L. , t• e--% a ‘r 1 I ' 3' Building Léttersw/restauränt I r • 21.#‘. I • /0 , 13 f - fr‘. . ., ."."--1 7- 10 SMAA WOUCO ix &ME) 0 J /_ Pacdale-r wwc.t_. oA) "THE Two O SIDE? fl1 FRffirsr ex/4�q..DJ To 7"xd'4ie. Q p A o d IL MZ H.Lui e , 55 0 . it0;15 O. . C:a . y t= c;65: v-1 ' t_LC•tJ . m R S"1 . .0 m mil. ILLLI llLIP77t t : H 1. • I 5 ' �� _ J `, 1 • • .r.. yp1°'•SCV:iL.>JpY .� ti'! v.b� ^°^'!A�" r a €' �- r , r t .. F ` 4. , . rose'* ,`S < vA `' � .- 3Fr, .Arw M ; ' ` , +' S s� ,a is ^ r AN • gq e ,,,..,ci,,, •••••::.1,5::::::::.•1: " ' ' ' t Iliti 3 • *� a $). 4 - 'z �\� • .;�yQ • ? _ • 4 e ems' I�'1 ,. • • • • f, • •.: . v \, • 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 17, 11R7 COMMENTS DUE: July 31. 1987 EFC - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shang)._ PROJECT TITLE: Park Place BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Project consists of a 115 room hotel , a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and and 40,000 sq.ft. of office space. LOCATION: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediatelt east of I-405 SITE AREA: 5.696 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 248,117.76 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 'I 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT. BUILDING & ZONING DEN WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 049 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-054-87 PROPONENT: RaMac, Inc. (Dan Shane) PROJECT TITLE : PARK PLACE 1, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: P.M OCT CONSISTS OF A 115 ROOM HOTEL. A 3.900 SO. FT., RESTTJRANT ANT) AN 40._o00 SQ., FT. OF OFFICE SPACE. LOCATION : 1800 MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, IMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-405 TO: ri PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION DTRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ® UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ei POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JULY 31, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED fl APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED DATE:' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 FA ,;i - , CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-054-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site approval for construction of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. resturant and 40, 000 sq. . ft. of office. PROPONENT: RaMac Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the 4. environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act * on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from August 20, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m.September 4, 1987, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. • Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION:. August 12 , 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: August 20, 1987 ! ,vtJ Ronald,G. Nelson i Larry M. Spring r i Building and Zoning Director Policy Development. Dir ctor 5 Richar C. Houghton IA- Public Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: RaMac, Park Place ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-055-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site approval for development of 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. restaurant and 40, 000 sq. ft. of office space. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. CONDITIONS: 1. That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the site. 2 . That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. ' 3 . That hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 4. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 5. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 on-ramp traffic v impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6, 300. 00 for kt r1.01 the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the r . . f p �6. That the applicant provide a detailed traffic impact analysis to I lv the satisfaction of the City°s Traffic Engineer to identify G "Viol additional traffic mitigation measures. 7. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant) from upland properties, the applicant shall provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing canopy trees around the parking areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building and Zoning Department. 8. That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. / ' Determination of Non gnificance Mitigation Measures RaMac, Park Place Page 2 9. That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 10. In order to mitigate anticipated future traffic impacts from this project, the owners of the site shall be required to provide a traffic mitigation fee of $188 per trip for the 2330 project generated trips by means of a bond or other means acceptable to the city or agree, by means of a covenant, to participate in a future LID for traffic related improvements identified in a future regional traffic impact mitigation study. Qy Note: The applicant will be credited for participation in the traffic impact mitigation study, as well as for any off-site traffic improvements identified from this study or provided for in advance of the study recommendations. Excess fees will be returned to the applicant or owners of the site. . .. . . .(//..". AMENDED OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT FLAN . "‹.....ie WESTPAR1C CONT)31e FILING 3 pLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT • If;* ! IN THE CITY OF UESTMINSTER - . • • _ COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO • , SHEET 3 op 4 •• . . • . . . .. .. . ..__ __•, • .. _ _____ . . . f•A•FX.-LL . -. ,,. ,_.,,,_ 8 E :718 , ...._. ..,5 cc;,,____.____ _ m--g---• • c.,. . ___• - //,. 0- % . . ''''•-%_...,,........,..._.„ <>< A19') i:a •- . - --). . ".......„......_ _ ci..5e...J. .__. . . ' H ' . •.. •.. • .... ' . •I , I' . =0.„.. ' ' -11°I.=- ' • •: .. :•. ..• : •• 1 ,/ . .. ... ,. . •• '•I / • ll 11, II ®/‘' 1 tioTos .. . . .. .... . .... , •... , , •--••• • • • ..•• • • .-• . , . . •• •.. ••• -.•• ...-. . cerabtru,uk,L.,....g.rt,i ,a, ,.........„„....,,. .• - ..... =_-) :: .-1 ' - i ....,.., _ . i .,_•,_. _i__,. . i . . : 6 SIDE ELEVATION . . I/gel II-0" . . • . .4.......,,, _ .__... ____._ ._.. i _ _._. ____ __- . _ ___. .--- • . • . 1, _ .....,_ .r CC: ; ..___ . _ _ ......, ;MI li -- gaol.ilLs. --. . -....., • • . __________.___nam__I...i, ._ . . N--;., • CtS 1 - .• _ ---„--- • • '::. • *..' • • •••• / : ;•. .! iI, , , :..,..:•• • • . . , . . . . ... •. . .. ... • 41114 1 - FT 42 WIN,374/4.4.,.• / 1 . ,_ L. • . r I. • •. . .• ...... . Cil I . ! 1 4060,1 .. .• • :.. ... !, ! i,.! . ).----, • . 1 \ ,:. . . . . .-• ... .. . . .., CD gi - . • • - _ w............, \ -2114176.-...4" \ 71.' 1-4-405e..irr- -L5,45.Y.,44•E • •, ,"- •.;•' •-•• -Vauf;'12...e.r".. I \ • ..:„ • u _• Zt:iv 5 .S. • 1- Mitt-h-wiFta. -1.- . MAZIP111.=+,*tizi .1;1 Val-1114Y VALLE. -. - . .1.I . SERVICE ELEVATION 49 ,ENTRY -0.0 a .. •Imi I• .1.I.i.fa911.-Ilegiv or. .V-0'P301..OW dir•Ave.-T•trICAL. 1/4Qg 1."-ON 1/4"gli_o• $4 ' ..... , . v...4....,,,...ers.r.4.42,, ..f.,..4cfe.1.41... vier611. 0. , .6.0,C TO 1:5V.LI.Str...4,T.. s‘WoThIlf1691.131-z.,CC. .III ' . . TOP OF PARAPET itALL . .1ia, R.A.S.FJA. . IMISNIII :RE5EAURAM 1 _ _ i . • , i. - -._, . .-_...,:,••'-•?..-- . - ___ _____ - -• . 4e•-•¢11:SOL DIA,ern.* • „............................................. --e..on-latarrE. . Way-rlUE.- ..... -- -- :Di : • ._...-, -. • '71 .: .14,, i,i. .... ".... . ---, . 1.21 gt. . ,....... ) • I Z. . ..:•...: I . ... :''. ..• G" C : .. 1 . Ill II • •:i. . . , . OH I .. . • •. I • i AT...W.4.v......1.4.1 :•'-'• •••. . '.•, ',• • .:.1 I 'I :ir I . :••••• , .... IF., I ..... ::, 1 ..... , c, • , .... . , „II 1;rii I , (,,.V.•,1,r,..,-,- . , «olVtr. ' ' • Dots:f..5 0.TIZIL MM.. ,f--...-“,. . .. fMNICNI • • • '• r i' .. , , i=-1 fi ,r ,, .r..., A.140 MS 1-107,-4, I LAI-trly-ArE. REARM ': 11111.1 \ Pi.e.-4 •,... , Rev: 6-15-84 .-Z. f ': .rrOttlIP OF CONC.SLAB i 1 .P ,--, L . LI, Li 1177 ,g , 1 ''..,c AS REQUIRED FOR LOCAL / , -------___ *.IPINES .r.J 1 Ji112.111.4987 L;Lo'' ' ..i,CODES AND FROST LINE. .I' -..- -I- . L- Oe.,µ.).1.41.....z;cryr......) . . • 1, ..::_:-.,..-i • • 0 • - _ . •.O.(.. =- 4-1c.VvIAlo AwLLIR-F15IAc.AAF,fCir..t, . : EXTERIORENTRY ELEVATION ..... ---.-.•:_ ,..(3/7,,,,„ ..... . . EXTEMON FINISHES, . "kj•"iVU D EPT• 'ELEVATIONS I/4"ak II-ON STUCCO ALmoitoE I MOE I TRW DARN BROWN Shoot No. . ROOF TILE REDISH•SROAN . . . . - . . _ sp--05y-g . . 7 NOTE, TRASH ENCLOSURE TO MATCH EXT.FINISHES. A7 .1 1. .. • • . . . . . .... . • RaMac, Inc. December 7, 1987 Mr. Jerry Lind City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washington 98055 RE: Park Place Site Dear Jerry: Submitted herewith is the following : 1 . Final site plan for Park Place 2. Landscape plan for Shari ' s Restaurant 3. Landscape plan for Silver Cloud Motel Thank you . Very truly yours, RAMAC, I JCO. -PKRATED Dan Shane President DS: hgk t < . Attachments LIND#2 RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392-4199 O - O54 - 7 PIS :G :Park Place Environmental Reconsideration ECF-049-87 , RaMac Inc. Transportation Planning & Engineering , Inc. 2101 - 112th Avenue N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 455-5320 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 -112th AVENUE N.E.,SUITE 110- BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H.BISHOP P.E. TELEPHONE 455-5320-AREA CODE 206 President September 11, 1987 Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP • Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South ©ATV ;F RENTON Renton, Washington 98055 R 0 '�' ED SEP L 11987 Re: Park Place Environmental Reconsideration, ��g ECF-049-87, RaMac Inc. BUN D 'eO/ZO NG DEPT. Dear Mr. Erickson: At the request of Mr. Dan Shane we have reviewed the data on the proposed Park Place office/restaurant/hotel complex, previously submitted to you. In our review and analysis we have incorporated new data ob- tained from the prospective tenant who will occupy the restau- rant site of the proposed project. We have performed a new trip generation` and distribution for each individual use on the site taking into account the newly obtained data. The proposed rezones of ERADCO and CENTRON are treated separately. TRIP GENERATION The proposed complex will contain 40,000 square feet of of- fice, 3900 square feet of restaurant and a 104 room motel. For the office and motel portion of the project the trip generation - • rates used were obtained from the ITE publication Trip Genera- tion, An Informational Report, (Third Edition) , 1983, land use codes 711 and 320 respectively. The number of trips generated by the restaurant were obtained from the prospective tenant and re- present actual data from an existing restaurant currently being operated by that tenant. The latter generation rates are in • agreement with data published by the State of California Depart- ment of Transportation in llth Progress Report on Trip Ends Generation Research Counts, July 1976, for a Denny's restaurant (see attachment) . Previously used rates from the ITE land use Park Place Environmental Reconsideration ECF-049-87, RaMac Inc. Sept. 11, 1987 Page -2- code 832 for the AM peak period represent two restaurants which apparently cater to breakfast patrons, which is not appropriate for this case. The revised projected vehicular trip ends generated by the project are as follows: 40,000 SF 3900 SF 104 Room Time Office Restaurant Motel Total • ADT 708 742* 1055 2341 AM pk. hr. in 85 30* 51 166 AM pk. hr. out 15 16 26 57 Total 100 46 77 223 PM pk. hr. in 16 10 34 60 PM pk. hr. out 97 4 34 135 Total 113 14 68 195 * Actual counts from prospective tenant TRIP DISTRIBUTION • Using the assumption that all site generated traffic will only use the Maple Valley Highway for ingress and egress, the AM and PM peak hour trips were distributed as follows: a. Office trips, 90 percent to and from the west and 10 percent to and from the east. b. Restaurant, 55 percent to and from the west and 45 percent to and from the east. c. Motel, 90 percent to and from the west and 10 percent to and from the east. IR Park Place Environmental Reconsideration ECF-049-87, RaMac Inc. Sept. 11, 1987 Page -3- This distribution emphasizes that both office and motel oper- ations are mainly oriented towards Interstate 405 and downtown Renton, while the restaurant will attract a large portion of its clients from developments to the east of the project. Using these projections the following AM and PM peak hour trip move- ments are expected to be contributed to the existing traffic by the proposed project. AM PEAK HOUR Eastbound Westbound Westbound Eastbound In} In Out Out J 4) L OFFICE 76 9 14 1 RESTAURANT 17 13 9 7 MOTEL 46 5 23 3 TOTAL 139 27 46 11 PM PEAK HOUR Eastbound Westbound Westbound Eastbound In In Out Out J 4 . L OFFICE 14 2 87 10 RESTAURANT 6 4 2 2 MOTEL 30 4 30 4 TOTAL 50 10 119 16 Figures 1 and 2 show the site-generated vehicle movements for the AM and PM peak hours. park Place Environmental Reconsideration ECF-049-87, RaMac Inc. Sept. 11, 1987 Page -4- TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Level of Service analysis calculations were performed for the AM and PM peak hours using the method for unsignalized "T" in- tersections as described in the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual - Special Report 209, 1985. It was as- sumed that the southbound project exit will have separate turning lanes for right and left turning vehicles. Forecasted conditions during the AM peak hour result in level of service E for east- bound left turning vehicles into the site as well as level of ser- vice E for left turning vehicles exiting the site. Exiting vehicles turning right are expected to experience level of ser- vice A. As can be seen in the attached calculations there will be some reserve capacity in both left turn movements. The number of vehicles turning left into the site from Maple Valley Highway could be reduced by allowing access to the site on N.E. 3rd Street. This could be accomplished by allowing right turns only into the site west of Monterey Drive S.E. at the existing Bronson Street right of way. Traffic could be prevented from exiting the site to the north through mechanical means south of the apartment complex. This would restrict the apartment' s left turn access. It is expected that if such access were allow- ed 46 office trips, 2 restaurant trips and 5 motel trips would use this access during the AM peak hour. The result would be that the number of left turns into the site on Maple Valley High- way would be reduced to 86. Even though the level of service would still be at E, this change would create an increase in re- serve capacity and bring the level of service for this movement very close to D. If right turn access to the site on N.E. 3rd Street is not allowed, the 139 left turning vehicles during the AM peak hour Park Place Environmental Reconsideration ECF-049-87 , RaMac Inc. Sept. 11, 1987 page -5- does satisfy the lower threshold volume of warrant 10 for instal- lation of a traffic signal. In the case that a traffic signal were installed, a capacity analysis using the method for signal- ized intersections in the Highway Capacity Manual results in an expected level of service B for the intersection during the AM peak hour. For unimpaired operation of the eastbound vehicles on Maple Valley Highway . it is important that the available storage capac- ity of the left turn lane is sufficient to contain the expected queue of left turning vehicles. If a signal were installed, it should be coordinated with, and operate at the same cycle length as the signal at the 1-405 access ramps. This present average AM peak hour signal cycle length was observed to be about 71 sec- onds. This type of operation would result in an average number of eastbound left turn vehicle arrivals of 2. 73 per cycle. Using the cumulative Poisson probability curves it is expected with a 95% probability that the maximum number of vehicles arriving dur- ing a cycle will not exceed 6. Using a distance of 25 feet per vehicle this would result in a maximum queue length of 150 feet. Currently the left turn pocket is 130 feet, which could be extend- ed to 150 by reducing the size of the existing traffic island or by paving the driveway about 20 ' to the east. Calculations for an unsignalized type of operation •during the PM peak hour show a level of service B for exiting vehicles making a left turn onto Maple Valley Highway and level of service A for those turning left into the site. These calculations take into account that there is an acceleration lane eastbound on Maple Valley Highway and that the eastbound traffic on the High- way will therefore not interfere with the exiting vehicles turn- ing left onto Maple Valley Highway. If no acceleration lane were present, the level of service for exiting vehicles turning left Park Place Environmental Reconsideration ECF-049-87, RaMac Inc. Sept. 11, 1987 Page -6- onto Maple Valley Highway is expected to be E/D. A signal at this location would result in level of service A for the intersec- tion during the PM peak hour. A pedestrian crossing of the Maple Valley Highway should not be installed at a non-signalized location. If a traffic signal is installed at the site driveways, it should include pedestrian crossing signals. If a traffic signal is not installed at the site driveway, the only nearby location for a safe pedestrian crossing of the Maple Valley Highway would be at the I-405 north- bound ramp signal. This would require the signalization of the eastbound traffic movement, which would be stopped only when a pedestrian pushes the button to activate the pedestrian walk signal. In regard to Monterey Terrace, there will be no traffic impact from the project on either Bronson Way, N.E. 3rd Street or Monterey Drive N.E. if emergency access only is allowed from N.E. 3rd Street. If right turn access into the site is allowed, 53 eastbound trips are expected to be added to the traffic on N.E. 3rd Street. These vehicles are not expected to enter the inter- section 'of N.E. 3rd Street and Monterey Drive N.E. as they will turn right into the site west of the intersection. Right turns on to N.E. 3rd Street from the site would be prohibited by a mechanical device south of the apartment complex. This would also prevent the potential for a "by pass" route through the site. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT In a conversation with the Renton Department of Parks and Recreation it was established that the expected number of daily vehicle trips is 700 for the proposed community recreation Park Place Environmental Reconsideration ECF-049-87, RaMac Inc. Sept. 11, 1987 Page -7- center. It is inherent in the operation of such a center that few of the vehicle trips will occur during the peak hours. And, with the access points of the park and the project site being approximately 400 feet apart it is not expected that they will interfere with each other' s operation. The land uses proposed for this site are allowed within the zoning for the site. The proposed uses are predominantly freeway oriented uses. The assumed trip distribution shows that 27 trips would come from the east and 11 trips would go to the east on Maple Valley Highway in the AM peak period. The PM peak hour trips are 10 and 16, respectively. The proposed rezones of ERADCO and CENTRON will have little effect on the distribution of the trips generated by this site. The impact of the trips generated by these rezones should be addressed by those rezone proposals at the time of the rezone application. We hope we have satisfied the Environmental Review Committee' s concerns about the traffic impacts of the project. However, if you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us at 455-5320. r'wow.4,, Very truly yours, e CI '• dC ,f 1�: � TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. • � GIS TO�., !s, �..... ,•cs als,`s+ Victor H. Bishop, P.E. , • •,�� " l.1L President JJM:pb Enclosures � 1oJ►.i1-C \Z- C:.. G rJ e- CZ A-T e' "C R l't \c-t=\ L vq\--Lie-`f \1\ 41-1N.JH`t • S1Tt • S1Te. 27 10 3q 4 �-- '30 1`"1 50 2`I o -----♦ 60 y —t AM . PGAK 1-\OU Ye., 'P M PE.Pst1c oJv, cc /ao '0 1'T\ o resat \Z\ G \-\ 'T 1-U\ZN1 AccS-SS \ iz\ �TC2t:.>~T \\11c 'b \\\E 3 a 5'� II .5 1 T E s -re • _ 30 ' M'V. \-1 2Li o \ 6Oy —4° '_ R M PEAK \-1 o LI K P 1"1 S E/\ 0)-\ 1C SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type General Office, Under 100,000 G.S.F. ITE Land Use Code 711 Independent Variable-Trips per _ 1 100 Grnss Square FPPt of Rill Ming ng Area Average • Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 17 7 28.8 8.8 20 50-2 Peak A.M. EntergS 7 1. 45 1. 90 1. 28 3 24 . 3 Hour • Between Exit 0. 25 0. 80 0.15 3 24 . 3 of 7 and 9 Total 2 . 50 3. 79 1. 40 15 41.9 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0. 19 0. 70 0. 06 3 24 . 3 Street Between Exit $6 c^ 1. 14 2.60 0. 74 3 24 . 3 Traffic 4 and 6 Total ,< 2 .821 6.39 0. 80 17 4_5. 7 Peak A.M. Enter 2.23 3.31 1.29 5 47.9 Hour Exit 0. 5 1 .04 0. 16 ' 5 47.n of Total �_92 5_ 98 1 _44 17 49.6 Generator P.M. Enter 6 0 0 0. 14 3 7 5 47-0 Exit 1 88 3 19 0 42 5 47 . 0 Total 7 2. 84 6_ 39 1 _ 12 18 51 .4 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 2 . 4 14.7 0. 6 • 10 42.6 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0..48 0. 77 0.20 5 58_4 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 1.2 7 . 3 0. 2 10 42.6 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0. 18 , 0. 37 0.06 5 58. 4 Source Numbers 5 , 21, 54 , 72, 88, 89, 92, 98, 100 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1982 G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Building Area SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type Motel ITE Land Use Code 320 Independent Variable—Trips per Occupied Room Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 10.14 14 .6 . 4 . 7 13 123 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Between Exit of 7 and 9 Total 7-316 Li 0.74 1.2 0. 4 10 150 Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit Traffic 4 and 6 Total 9' , ' • 0.65 0.9 0.5 7 , 171 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Exit of Total 0.81 L 3 0.. 4 11 122 Generator P.M. Enter • Exit Total 0_ .3 1 _ 3 0.5 13 _ 129 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 86 12_f 4.7 9 140 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0.76 1 _9 0.5 9 140 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 7 _7 3 11 A 3.11 9 14 0 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0 59 1 0 n 4 9 140 , Source Numbers 2 4,_11,_13, . 72, 92 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6—Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975, Rev. 1979 I' S�cc- - dc- C,k ko.�r- % . '0 e-se oT r'h NY"ens k" v} 'T'c-ow,5 v d r \- ✓\-►bir, • 1.' • TRIP GENERATION STUDY SUMMARY I \\ \A- 9";)C'-" `2Q.Vark- 6., 71'\v ' - nrl4•S>2•-•,,2r,,\--i-0,. `tk,2__5._,„,(., • Name of study site Denny's Restaurant c� ,�,Y,1 S , �,,��Y �� 6 t 5 j Study 0 ,1 Location .....J...1..9....Alto......: . l!.•I Coffee ShopIrl Type of development , 11,j1 Date Jan. 27-Feb. 2, 1976 ., I 1.` HI, BACKGROUND DATAIli ( .i 25 Employees O en 24 howl; 1 P y,, 1/7 ,Ix.....,,....,..,,. 9..... ......l xoeo Floor...Area tf- ur$ ail, ` Acre �I - 102 •f Seats .. ..... . .. ... ...,.YA:.n:..:,.:,:.::n.....:..::n...:..,n:...,.....:.......,. IP ....:.Y.Y.x:.,.:x..xn,..Y....,.....:x:..M::..:.:::..:....Y 51 Parking Spaces ;N; L- . � I• Ywxw,,,,.x::.,nv.MYMw:.:nVY.. ....nv,M.Y.:.:x..,.v................v. ., .:Y,.++...w. ,n.V•.,. ..:.,.,........ ... ...-.,.».,..:,w,.VxV»,M.Mn 'h� ..' . MwnVwVrM+ Yrx:w,Mvnv:,:v v P.to . • V.xwV V . •.,O .VxVVMw ,w+n.r.,,vh,•.x,•r.v.,,,,,v..„v.,,.vYx i '.I nv.Y.•.,xyr..vn.w..wnVw.wMxxV•nxvnVw..»M AY.J.M nMnV A.wY..V .y., .. r ;' TRAFFIC DATA . {. it 41• 7: r,, '':., ,I, A M PEAK HOUR P M PEAK HOUR I'r 'r. I TIME 24 HOUR i'`' ,1 '•, I'll I INBOUND OUTBOUND TOTAL HOUR INBOUND OUTBOUND TOTAL HOUR TOTAL .I:;• ^,iti E4 BEGINS BEGINS 'it 18 21 39 08:00 17 34 51 12:00 560 tr- •,' 11;„ SATADAY 54 08•oo 4o13:00 23 • 'ic isl` ` SUMDAY +j :I 72 11.00 67 12:00719l 11 y i 'i: WEEKDAY VEHICLE OCCUPANCY RATES: WEEKDAY TRUCK PERCENTAGE = — %. i- • F� ii �ilf AUTOS = 1.39 Customers via: ,' 1 •'; j . BUSES = _- Auto m 69.91% '"1 I IP i I i TRUCKS = Walk 27.92% ,;° ;z Bicycle s 1.30% ,a: ri • ' ; ;li TRIP Motorcycle a 0.86% " RATIOS .4> 3I II' . ?;t,. Trips per: WEEKDAY' + ;: SATURDAY SUNDAY : , ck .Employee 22.40 . 28.92 28. 6 " - 1000J' Ft :,:::.::hY fir. SQ• . G.F.A.G.F.A ....... :ry 112.00:.. 144.60, 143.80 "e. ids Acre : 1018.R.18:.. 1314...55 . 1.307.27 . 'r Seat9Seat 5,49 . Y: : Z....09..— „wr 7...,05i......- ,.'• , Parking Space 14.18 F;. r': 10.98 1? .10 :T. IP . ,.:.:................. n: �,.....,. .. V...,..:...Y. ;. i 96 a. 7 • SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type High Turnover, Sit-Down Restaurant ITE Land Use Code 832 Independent Variable-Trips per 1,000 Square Feet • Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 164.4 551.2 47.9 9 S.7 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Between Exit of 7 and 9 2A Total* 47.5 63.5 24.0 2 3 1 Adjacent P.M. Enter 9.9 17.3 7.6 3 11 7 Street Between Exit 4.0 10.3 3.2 3 11 7 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 10.5 . 38.7 3.0 . 11 8 3 Peak A.M. Enter 10.1 11.9 6.6 4 9.6 Hour Exit Between 5.5 20.8 2.4 4 9.6 of 12-1 P.M. Total 15.7 75.0 S_1 19 7.2 Generator P.M. Enter 13.0 17.8 11 7 • 3 8.2 Between Exit 6 and 7 9-2 21 .7 h 8 3 8.2 Total 22.2 39.0 18.0 3 8.2 • Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 67.8 105.2 62.4 2 9.7 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 10.0 13.2 7.0 6 10.9 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 39.0 40.0 32.4 2 9.7 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 6.9 8.8 . 4.6 . 6 10.9 Source Numbers 2, 4, 5, 72 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: July 197S *Represents two restaurants which apparently cater to breakfast patrons. 1985 HCM: LJNS I GNAL I LED INTERSECTIONS Page-1. A\ at••x••r• •******•r * ;•*********3t•**•x••x•• •**•x•**********•x•*********#at•x••x•• •• •*at•********* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET . '":0 i PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 AREA POPULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300000 . NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' MAPLE VALLEY HWY NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET DRIVEWAY NAME OF THE ANALYST JM DALE Of- THE ANALYSIS (rnrn/dd/yy) 9/10/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED AM A\ s\ke.. cyz-ne-t-evIt c.\ IrcoAloc Q S oa V-•\ekv\` \/ a\\e., \Aw�,. INTERSECTION TYPE.: AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: INTERSECTION MAJOR STREE.1.. DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHNOUNU: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ES WS NIA SS LEFT :139 0 -- 11 THRU 240 1639 -- 0 RIGHT c 0 27 •--- • 46 NUMBER OF LANES ES WS ND SEC LANES -- .-, i ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 A PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 00 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 00 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- ___ SORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 §§ N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES V. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- --- ___ SOOTHBOUND O 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS SB 5. 50 5. 00 0. 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5. 50 5. 00 0. 00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 00 6. 50 0. 00 6. 50 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-34 __________________ _ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE � RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 12 95 21 21 9 F RIGHT 51 483 483 483 432 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 153 185 185 185 32 E ` - 198:5 HCMk UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS F'k9e-1-B *• ********•*•********•*•*************************************•***•********* IDENT IFYING . INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . . . . . . . . „ 30 PEAK HOUR FAC1OR. . . . . . , 1 AREA POPULATION. „ . „ 300000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET MAPLE VALLEY HWY NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET DRIVEWAY NAME OF THE ANALYST JM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . < 9/10/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED AM fs. c," \:ov,ca\ r\l' "ATY, oh\� cLcca" v \ a 1�1 3 \ '5lr2L_ INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T—INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST • CONTROL TYPE_ <SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ED NB NB SB L_,EFT. tF 0 -- 11 THRU 241:) 163 -- i RIGHT 0 27 -- ' 46 NUMBER OF LANES E_D WN NB SB , LANES 2 2 -- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2-26 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 00 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 00 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- -__ . SORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 N zU VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 0 WESTBOUND 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND --- --_ __a SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES . ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS SB 5. 50 5. 00 0. 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS ED 5. 50 5. 00 0. 00 5. 00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 00 6. 50 0. 00 ` 6. 50 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 -:5 ________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M 8H R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 12 95 54 54 42 E RIGHT 51 483 483 483 432 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 95 185 185 185 90 E ' ' 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ' ********************************************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ______ -------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET MAPLE VALLEY HWY ` NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET DRIVEWAY AREA TYPE. . . . . . . . . . OTHER NAME OF THE ANALYST JM DATE OF THE ANALYSIq 9/10/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED AM OTHER INFORMATION: &0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 139 0 0 11 THRU 240 1639 0 0 RIGHT 0 27 0 46 RTOR 0 0 0 0 (RTOR volume must be less than or equal to RIGHT turn volumes. ) | | � . ` I N..I..ERSE:CT I ON GEOMETRY RY Prag e-2 C NUMBER OF. LANES PER U:L RE C T I l'::1N INCLUDING TURN BAYS: EASTBOUND - WESTBOUND =. 2 NORTHBOUND = 0 i SOUTHBOUND = ES WB NB SB LANE TYPE. WIDTH TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH 1 L. 12. 0 T 12. 0 12. 0 L 12. 0 2 T 12. 0 T 12. 0 12. 0 , . 0 T 1 . c�; 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 4 1.:2:. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 6 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT .LANE "I" - EXCLUSIVE '1"HROUGH LANE Lr - LEI "I /THROUGH LANE '1"R - THROUGH/RIGHT LANE. LR - LE -FT/FIGHT ONL..Y LANE h - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT LANE LTR - LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE ADJUSTMENT FAC:1ORS GRADE HEAVY VE.H. ADJACENT PKG BUSES (%) (X) Y/N (Nm) (Nb) PHF' EASTBOUND 0. 0u 2. 00 N 0 __`V?_ 0n 9h WESTBOUND 0. 00 2. 00 N 0 0 0. 90 i NORTHBOUND ii, 00 2. u0 N 0 0 0. 9h SOUTHE:OUND 0. 00 2.. 00 N Q 0 i i. 9i i Nm = r•l mber of parI•::ing m<•aneuvers/hr; Nb = number, of buses stopping/hr CONFLICTING F'EDS PEDESTRIAN BUTTON (pods/hour) (Y/N) (min T ) ARRIVAL TYPE EASI POUND 0 N 8. 5 WESTBOUND 0 N 8. 5 _ NORTHBOUND 0 N 17. 5 _ SOUTHBOUND n N 17. 5 _• _ ` SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Page-3C- ______________- ===== ACTUATED LOST TIME/PHASE 3. 0 CYCLE LENGTH = 71 . 0 EAST/WEST PHASING ____________________________ _ PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4 EASTBOUND LEFT � THRU X / X ' RIGHT PEDS WESTBOUND LEFT THRU X RIGHT X PEDS NORTHBOUND RT 3OUTHBOUND RT GREEN 10. 0 40. 0 0. 0 0. 0 YELLOW + ALL RED 4. 0 4. 0 0. 0 0. 0 NORTH/SOUTH PHASING ______________________ PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4 NORTHBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT ` PEDS SOUTHBOUND LEFT X THRU ' RIGHT X PEDS EASTBOUND RT ' WESTBOUND RT GREEN 9. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 ' YELLOW + ALL RED 4. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 � I VOLUME: ADJUSTMENT WORE::SHEET Page-4G LANE LANE ADD. MV'1' „ ( DJ . LANE GRP. NO. lJ'T'TL. GROWTH GRP PROP PROP VOL. PHI-' VOL . GRP. VOL. LIB FACT . FACT. VOL. LT RE Li :1-%9 0. 90 154 L 154 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 154 1 . 00 0. 00 TH 240 0. 90 267 .I.. 267 1 . 050 1 . 000 280 0. 00 0. 00 RI' r` 0„ 90 tj NFI TH 1 6 _;`1 0. 90 1 G2:I. 'T 1821 2 1 . 050 1 . 000 191.2 0. 00 0. 00 RT' +:�'l 0. 90 0 Hu I n 0, 90 () TI-I 0 0. 90 0 R1 0. 90 :3:( I_ I.. I I. 0. 90 12 L 12 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 12 1 . 00 0. 00 IH 0. 90 I.,i 46 0. 90 11. 1 R 51 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 51 0. 00 1 . 00 * Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group g T q T 000 ' T 0r8 '0 000 " T 0c:)c:) " T (:)00 " T i 0t ic:0 ° T 066 "c i f i00 " T T 0081 T ,a gT T Lice "O 00 0 " T cx:)o " T 000 " T c)oc:) " T 000 ' T 066 "0 0M00 " 1: T 008T a:s • aN •I 9c'E 000 ' T c:0c::00 ° T 000 " T. 000 " T 00c) ' T 000 " T 066 "0 (0)00 ° T 7. 00S T 1. eM • • 179c2 000 " T c:)':)(:0 ' T i)c)c:) " T c:)( :) ° T 000 " T i x)c) ° 1: i)66 "O i 00 " T 008 T t. 2691 0g6 'c::a 000 " T 000 " T 000 " T c ic`0c:0 " T 000 " T 06 y 'C0 000 " T T 008 T �I MO1.-1 11 .i..rl H 88 d 0 i1H it SN1 MO_l..i ".LHS + + + + + + + "ON "IV S . "COW ). —aBe,-1 1113HEDNOM ..1.N.=11.'t1.f::i'Lf..''t:ic) Did I\1!_1I..1..V'-1i"l..I..VS CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Page-6 C_ AOJ. ADJ. SAT. FLOW LANE GROUP FLOW RATE FLOW RATE RATIO GREEN RATIO CAPACITY v/c (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) RATIO EB L 154 1693 0. 091 0. 155 262 0. 589 * 1 280 3564 0. 079 0. 775 ' 2761 0. 101 WB T 1912 3564 0. 537 0. 577 2058 0. 929 * NB SO L 12 1515 0. 008 0. 141 213 0. 057 R Si. 1515 0. 034 0. 141 213 0. 240 * Cycle Length, C = 71 . 0 sec. Sum (v/c) critical = 0. 661 Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 9. 0 sec. X critical = 0. 758 LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET Page-7 Cc_ ============================______________________ DELAY LANE DELAY LANE LANE DELAY LOS v/c g/C CYCLE d GROUP d PROG. GRP. GRP. BY BY RATIO RATIO LEN. 1 CAP. 2 FACT. DELAY LOS APP. APP. EB L 0. 589 0. 155 71 . 0 21 . 2 262 2. 5 1 . 00 23. 7 C 9. 2 B T 0. 101 0. 775 71 . 0 1 . 5 2761 0. 0 0.85 ' 1 . 3 A WB T 0. 929 0. 571 71 . 0 10. 4 2058 5. 9 0. 85 13. 9 B 13. 9 B NB SB L 0. 057 0. 141 71 . 0 20. 1 213 0. 0 1 . 00 20. 1 C 18. 1 C R 0. 240 0. 141 71 . 0 20. 6 213 0. 1 0. 85 17. 6 C Intersection Delay = 13. 2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B 1985 HCI': UNS IGNAL I ZED INTERSECTIONS Page-•1.D .*..*.*.*.*..*..*..*..*.*.*..*..*..****-*•***•**********•************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET 30 i PEAK HOUR FACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. AREA FOF'Lll_A I Ttllu., . .'. . . . 300000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . VALLEYHWY • MAPLE NAME OF 111E NORTH/SOUTH STREET DRIVEWAY NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jh1 DATE OF THE: ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 9/10/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM A\\ s\k� cja.-he-rcxlr Qd \-c- Ak c •�'� a 1`� a�\e 'J c�\\w \-L . v\., c�c t- \Q r c o v, \ cw1 it , T-0\Q,0 4. \J a 11 a �w c , INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-I NTE.RSECT I ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN • TRAFFIC VOLUMES ED ND ND SD LEFT 50 0 __. 16 THRU 0 630 -- 0 RIGHT 0 1') , -- 119 NUMBER OF LANES ED NB NB SB ADJUS I"MEN I" f AC:TnRS F'agP-2 5) PERCENT R I L,H"C' "('URN CURB RAD is US (f t) ACCELER(--Vi I ON LANE GRAN; ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 ..1(.) N WrgTr'oUND 0. 00 90 20 N NOR`i"I-HBOUND -_-_-- --- ---- - SOUT'I.IDOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEH:I:( I._EY'' cONI O ;isTCONI Eli TRUCKS COMBINATION AND RV'RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND Ci i 0 i 0 WE:5T'k:OUND 0 0 0 i NORTHBOHND -.- - --- --- SOUIH%sOLJND 0 0 0 CRITICAL GAF-3 TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT D I S'T'. FINAL, ( rabic, 1.0-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL OAF' MisNUR RIGH'1"S SD 5. 50 43. 00 (). 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS ES 5. 50 5. 00 0. 00 5. 00 i MINOR LEFTS S P 7. 00 6. 50 0. 00 6. 50 / CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 �� ___________________ __________________________________ _________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v - LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 18 376 356 356 338 B RIGHT 131 871 871 871 740 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 55 604 604 604 549 A - ` • 1985 Hi N: IUNS:I:GNAL.:E zED INTERSECTIONS Page.-1 . • IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE. RUINING SPEED, MAJOR STREET T�i PEAK HOUR FACTOR 1 AREA POPULATION :300000 , NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET MAPLE VALLEY HWY NAME OF. THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET DRIVEWAY NAME. OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . „TM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 9/10/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM A\I g‘ke grLv,ca.rat.-k2_c+ Nra_A} c_ 'Aq d"\Ay\e_ Nla\\0_� \.ay . w\\-\1oN \ a-ace-AR- a. ; off \cw►t ov, W1 of\t \J ".Me-e.•s \-k„aus, INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 1 —INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOU'THDOLJND: STOP S I'I3N TRAFFIC VOLUMES I :D W8 NB SS LEFT 50 0 --- 16 .1 I..1FtU E:302 630 -- c> RIGHT 0 10 -- 119 NLll"I}3ER OF LANES I..I:: WFt * NB SB LANES 2 2 --- .., ADJUSTMENT FACTORS . Page-2 E PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (+t) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 0 0 ' 0 WESTBOUND a 0. U NORTHBOUND --- --- ___ SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 CRITICAL BARS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS SB 5. 50 5. 00 0. 00 5. 00 MAJOR LEFTS . , LB . 5. 50 5. 00 0. 00 5. 00 ' MINOR LEFTS SB 7. 00 6. 50 0. 00 6. 50 ' CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE- Page-31S _____________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 18 112 106 106 88 E RIGHT . 131 871 871 871 740 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 55 604 604 604 549 A ' ` ! ' ' ' ' 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-11� ********************************************************************** , IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ____ ____________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET MAPLE VALLEY HWY NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET DRIVEWAY AREA TYPE. . . . . . . OTHER NAME OF THE ANALYST JM DATE OF THE ANALYSIS . . , . . . . . . 9/10/87 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED PM OTHER INFORMATION: A)) S%km_ �a-m ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES _ EB WB NB SB LEFT 50 0 ----- 0 16 THRU 1604 630 0 . 0 RIGHT 0 10 ' 0 119 RTOR 0 0 0 0 (RTOR volume must be less than or equal to RIGHT turn volumes. ) iNT'EE SLCTION GEOMETRY Page-'.2 t= NUMBER OF LANES PER D:E REEL. :EON :E NCL.UD:E NG TURN BAYS: EASTBOUND = _ WESTBOUND = 2 NORTHBOUND = 0 SOUTHBOUND = ES WB NB SD LANE TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH 1 L 12. 0 T 12. 0 12.0 L 12. 0 .,-. 7 12. 0 ..I.. 12. 0 12. 0 R 12. 0 -. T J2. 0 12. 0 12.0 12. 0 4 1^. 0 12. 0 12. 0 1:2. 0 5 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 o .12. f) 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 L -•- EXCLUSIVE LET- 1 LANE . 1 - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LANE LT - LEF.F/THROUGH LANE TR - THROUGH/RIGHT LANE LR •- LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE: Fi - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT LANE L_'TR - LEE-'•I /T'HEOUGH/RIOH'T LANE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HEAVY VEH. ADJACENT N G BUSES (%) (%) Y/N (Nm) (Nb) PHF EASTBOUND 0. 00 2. 00 N ii 0 0. 90 WESTBOUND 0. 00 2. 00• N Q ci ii. 90 NORTHBOUND 0. 00 ,2. 00 N 0 0 0. 9u SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 2.00 N 0 0 0. 90 0 Nm = number of parking maneuvers/hr; Nb = number, of buses stopping/hr CONFL 1:C1 I NG PEDS PEDESTRIAN BUTTON (penis/hour) (Y/N) (min 1) ARRIVAL TYPE EASTBOUND Q N 11 . 7 _ WESTBOUND 0 N 1 1 . _ NORTHBOUND 0 N 22 SOUTHBOUND ii N ^222, 8 _ rn 7 n f .= rn• i^i rn,i rr•, n i:,r. rn r, •N• ,.,r_. 1:,•. . , '•..•I.•....F..�, . ,...._ / SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Page-330 ACTUATED LOST TIME/PHASE = 3, 0 CYCLE LENGTH = 71 . 0 EAST/WEST PHASING ' ______ _________ PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4 EASTBOUND LEFT X THRU X X RIGHT PEDS WESTBOUND LEFT THRU X RIGHT X PEDS NORTHBOUND RT ` SOUTHBOUND RT GREEN 10. 0 40. 0 0. 0 0. 0 YELLOW + ALL RED 4. 0 4. 0 0. 0 0. 0 NORTH/SOUTH PHASING ___-_______ PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4 NORTHBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT ' PEDS SOUTHBOUND LEFT X THRU RIGHT X PEDS EASTBOUND RT - WESTBOUND RT GREEN 9. 0 0. 0 0.0 0' 0 YELLOW + ALL RED 4. 0 0. 0 0.0 0, 0 _ VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Page-4 �F LANE LANE ADJ. MT. ADJ. LANE GRP. NO. UTIL. GROWTH GRP. PROP PROP VOL. PHF VOL. GRP. VOL. LN FACT. FACT. VOL. LT RT ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _-__ ____ ---- EN LT 50 0. 90 56 L 56 1 1 .000 1 . 000 56 1 . 00 0. 00 TH 1604 0. 90 1782 T 1782 2 1 . 050 1 . 000 1871 0. 00 0. 00 RT 0 0. 90 0 . WB LT 0 0. 90 0 TH 630 0. 90 700 T 700 2 11050 1 . 000 735 0. 00 0. 00 RT 10 0. 90 11 NB LT 0 0. 90 0 TH 0 0. 90 0 RT 0 0. 90 0 SB / LT 16 0. 90 18 L 18 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 18 1 . 00 0. 00 TH 0 0. 90 0 RT 119 0. 90 132 R 132 1 1 . 000 1 . 000 132 0. 00 1 . 00 * Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group ` • • • • • T S T c:)0(0 ' T 0."-.;8 'c:r 000 " T 000 ' T 000 ' T 000 " T 066 "0 000" T T oi18 T .� Mgr o 8 'o c:000 " T c)c:)o ' T 00c:) ' T c:000 ° T 000." T 066 '0 000 " T T 008 l: -I 8 8 • GN •I79r2 c:100 ' T c:)00 ° T 0 10 ' T 000 " T 000 ° T 000 " T 066 '0 00 i ' T Z 008T 1 M 179g : 000 ' T 000 'T 000 " T 000 ' T 000 ' T i)00 ° T 066 '0 i l00 ' T Z 008 T 1. 2691 T C 6 'C) c)C(.) ' T C(x) " T 000 " T. 000 ' T 000 " T -066 "0 000 " 1: I 008 T �I t1 MO1.-i 11 18 H 8a d . 9 AH M 8N-1 M(:1....L:1 "1.V5 f + + i• 4. "ON ".LljS °f.Uk9 -'VDCTI 4 g-aSed .LBBH8:::•IdoM _I..NFIN.I..BfI.Cau MOld NoI..I..H?lr11.k'8 CAF'AC1: 1 Y ANALYSTS WORKSHE ET Fags-61 ADJ . ADJ . SAT. FLOW LANE GROIJF' FLOW RATE FLOW RATE RATIO GREEN RATIO CAPACITY v/c (v) (s) (v/s) (q/C) (c) RATIO ED I... 56 .I.69:?: 0. ()33 0. 155 262 0. 212 T 187J. ...c564 0. 525 0. 775 2761 0. 67B • Wq 1 735 3564 0. 206 0. 577 205E O. :_.57 I+I11 Cry I_ 10 151.5 0. 012 0. 141 213 0 083 R 1 _7. :I.51. 0. 087 0. 141 Cycler I._.(:rri91g1, C -.. '71 , 0 sec. Sum (v/s) critical = 0. 612 Lost Time Per Cycle, L. = 6. 0 sec. X critical = 0.669 1 1 - LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET Page-71� DELAY LANE DELAY LANE LANE DELAY LOS v/c g/C CYCLE d GROUP d PROG. GRP. GRP. BY BY . RATIO RATIO LEN. 1 CAP. 2 FACT. DELAY LOS APP. APP. ( EB L 0. 212 0. 155 71 . 0 19. 9 262 0. 1 1 . 00 20. 0. C 3. 4 A T 0. 678 0. 775 71 . 0 2. 9 2761 0.5 0. 85 2. 9 A WB . T 0. 357 0. 577 71 . 0 6. 1 2058 0. 0 0. 85 5. 2 B 5. 2 B NB SB L 0. 083 0. 141 71 . 0 20. 2 213 0. 0 1 . 00 20. 2 C 21 . 6 C R 0. 620 0. 141 71 . 0 21 . 8 213 3. 8 0. 85 21 . 8 C Intersection Delay = 4. 8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A ^ ' V vs a .a. v a- a.a.—a. G n '� ' , , . BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • �Nrc (I:) o 'eP APPUCATI.ON MASTER NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is o comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applicotion(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION I FEES 1 . \�CJ [ /l%C ❑ R- EZONE+(FROM TO ) ADDRl�S, lLS 3 ❑ SPECIAL PERMIT* TT11�� ❑ TEMPORARY PERMIT* ur ) 9' Z 7 ❑ C- ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* l P. /v ® SITE PAN APPROVAL TELEPHONE ❑ SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 2- ��1�Cl - No. of Cubic Yards: . VARIANCE* CONTACT PERSON • ❑ From Section: * Justification Required NAME N S I�LIiiNE- 4 o ADDRESS _ r�_.._, SUBDIVISIONS: D G j G' SE 3G-1 !b �'J 2,9- ., e``'© SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP CD TENTATIVE PLAT Is S G{C`U{ 12,e`? ❑ PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE V ❑ FINAL PLAT ❑ WAIVER It (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: �— PLAT NAME: NAM5 ADDR • -" - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOFMENT: -ii . ...._ • L9 , -6ak 6nG 1::::1 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL �,3 ��e 0�- 4 , o 7 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 3 `p � , / I ❑ Residential ❑ . Industrial 9 MOBILE HOME ❑PARKS:Commercial ❑ Mixed LOCATION PROPERTY ADDRESS C/ / / 04. 'L/ t ❑ TENTATIVE /O D , C Qp Pa`le�I *-405 ❑ PRELIMINARY EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING ❑ FINAL /ac4rir 8— PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: NUMBER OF SPACES: ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: TOTAL FEES STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ❑ Accepted ❑ Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ❑ Accepted i ❑ Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: ❑ Building ❑ D• esign Eng. ❑ F• ire ❑ Parks ❑ Police ❑ P• olicy Dev. ❑ T• raffic Eng. El Utilities T)Vf/T1.T* .• - . Legal description of property (If more space Is required, attach a separate sheet): • • • • AFFIDAVIT • 1, I )f), S (-1 Pty� bein • dulydeclare that� 9 sworn, a I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,(owner of the property Involved ' : In this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the • Information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /A v-�+f DAY . OF 191. • NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE;OF WASHI/ TON, RESIDING At t • OfelA (Name of No ary Public de (Signature of Owner) Pee. ' ')e✓ `?14. V '•) e)?<. ‘5- 3 (Address) (Address) • " Pe„1 / ,,' (Au h ‘)e e .► 7 f (City) (State) (Zip) • (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete . application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." . Foxm #174 V • OF it14. 'fp'. 2 • • City of Renton ?9 Pts. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST :µ 'bar v Fo so%- '3 pur Checklist: . The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). chapter 43.2I C R;W.l before r king governmental agencies to e impact re statement ontal(EIS) mpacts ust bete pared for allproposals decisions. An environmental with probable significant adverse impacts nt the you and of hthena�encY identify impacts purpose of this checklist is to provide information if it can be done) from your proposal (and_to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. . Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks your o thisedescribe chece klist basico informationthe environmental impacts of your proposaletermine whether aout your proposal. Governmental agencies are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. • Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. tp th• e best,of your You must -answer each question accuratiloy any carefully,eations from your own knowledge. In most cases, you should be able no observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. ot s If yyounreally doknow of kdo w the answer, or if a question does not apply to your propoa not apply." Complete answers to the gU°melons ntalnow regulations,av such as zoning,id unnecessary horoliner.and Some questions ask about govern landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. • al. even It you plan to do The checklist questions apply to all parts of your propos them over a period of time or on different P °or its of lenvlronm nt land. Attach aeffectsadditl The nal information that will help describe your proposal agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to determining explain if theym ourmay bed sigor vide additional information reasonably related adverse impacts. : Use of Checklist for Nonprolect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) . , Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though �NTALt ens may y be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the S NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). . bmS , For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions "project," on'poflc estand plans and nd troggr site the references In the checklist to h "affected geographic area; respectively. should be read as "proposal." "proposer," A. BACKGROUND 1, Name of proposed project, if applicable: PARK PLACE 2. Name of applicant: • R AM A C, INC. 3.- Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: P. 0. Box ` 653 Renton, Washington 98057 392-4199 " Dan Shane • 4. Date checklist prepared: S. Agency requesting checklist: Renton Building Department 6. 'Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): : . , Phase I , Hotel and Restaurant start date - Late 1987 . Phase II Proposed Office Building start date - Mid 1990 7. . Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. • No 8. . List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ' Soils reports have been previously submitted on this site . 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by ydur proposal? If yes, explain. No. • 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. N/A 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. - The total site covers an area of 5. 696 acres. It will have mixed use - all of which are compatible with the B-1 'zoning. The site will have a Hotel , Restaurant and Future Office Building. • 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and . section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located on Maple Valley Highway immediately 'East 1 of I-405 in Renton , Washington. The site i.s located in the N.E. 4 of Section 17 township ' 23N, Range' 5E 'in King County. i The property Is contiguous with Maple Valley Highway on. the South, the North-bound on-ramp to I-405 " on the West , Bronson • Way N.E. on the North and Monterey Terrace on the East. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. i EARTH a. General description of .the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes. mountainous, other . Generally flat with some slopes . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 30% to 40% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example. caly. sand. gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Compacted glacial tile. d. . Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the Immediate vicinity? If so, describe. • No. - 2 • - i • - 0.. 'bescribs the purpose. type, and approximate'(identities of any filling Or • grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 'A minimum amount of grading will be involved on the site. At the time of construction of the -proposed office building • excavation will occur for underground parking. • f. Cold erosion ioccur as a result of clearrng, construction, or use? If so, 'generally descibe. No. , g. About what percent of the site will be covered with Impervious surfaces `after project Construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?• : . Approximately 60% of the site will be covered . h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth. if any: Rockery retaining structure along with trees and ground cover will be used to control any possible erosion on the site. 2. AIR • • "• What types of•'bmissioni to the air Jvould 're=ult"frond the pi ibsel (i.e.. dust, automobile, odors. Industrial wood smoke) during construOtion and when the project Is completed? If any. generally describe and give • . • approximate quantities If known. Some dust will be created during construction whereas auto emissions will be created both during construction and after it' s completion. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission?• • Proposed reasurea to reduce or centred emitisioni.Of other.impeicts to air. if any: None. . • 3. WATER • a. Surface: . ' • 1) • Is theme any'aUrface wader bbdy bn br.in the'.iiiinieiiiatef`vieli lt5i t the slab . °R (including year-round and seasonal streams.-L.saltwater, lakes, ponds, •-•'" wetlands)? �If yes, describe'type and 'provide.nbmet. If appropriate, state • what stream or river It flows into. • No. .. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) ••"• the described Waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. •" • No. • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A • • - 3 - • 4) . Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. • • • • No. ,5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. • • No. i6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. None. • 2) Describe waste material that' will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such.systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of,animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) . Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, If known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. i Storm water will be retained in underground CMP retention collectors. The parking lots will also be slop-ed to provide retention ponds . 2) Could waste materials. enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No . - 4 - • s • ' d. • Proposed measures to reduce or control surface. ground,,end runoff water Impacts, If any: . • The runoff water will be controlled in collectors as • described earlier. • 4. Plants . . . ,. . a. Check or circle types o f•vegetation found on the site: ' A deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir. cedar, pine. other p' Shrubs - . '' grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulirush. skunk cabbage. other • o water plants: water lily, eel grass. milfoil, other o other types of vegetation • b.... ..What kindamount and of vegetation will be removed or altered?, • The only kind of vegetation that will be removed will be some small shrubs and grass'. • • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. • None. • d' Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measues to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site. if any: • Rhododendrons, deciduous. and evergreen ,trees or ,.shrubs will be planted through out the site as decribed in the general design criteria. 5. Animals . •a. . . Circle any birds' and animals 'which have been obteirved on.tic bier'the site , • or are'known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle so • . • other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, • -aver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. • c. . ..Is the site part.of a migration route? If so. explain., ,, ,,.i.:.:. . No. - 5 - d. • Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. If any: The sloped area will be left as it presently• exists ° or will be enhanced by planting shrubs and trees.' • I • 6. !Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas. oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas and electricity will be used on, the site for heating,- cooling and cooking . b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The construction will conform to the existing Washington State Energy Code. 7. ;Environmental Health .a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, If any: N/A b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment. operation, other)? Traffic noise from I-405 and Maple Valley Highway will have an affect upon the project. - 6 - • 3 • What types and levels of noise would be created by(foror exciat d:withf t ce project on a short-term or a long-term basis • .construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come • from the site. Construction noise from 7 A.M. to 5 P.M. (Short Term) . 3) proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The existing buffer created by the natural ground cover . 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? It is presently vacant land . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so. what? N/A • e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? B-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? B-1 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline'master program designation of the site? • N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? if so. specify. No. i, Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 200 people j. . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k, Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - 7 - . 1. • Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and • projected.land uses and plans. if any: . • The site use have been discussed and coordinated with • the City of Renton Planning Department . 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided. if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units. If any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle. or low-Income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The tallest structure could possibly be four stories with stucco , concrete, glass and wood materials. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. If any: • A general list of design guidelines are given as a part of the overall development. 11. ;Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Possible sun reflection off of reflective glass. This ' would occur in the afternoon. b. " . Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? • No.• c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or•control light and glare impacts, if any: , • None - 8 - • 12.. Recreation a. . What designated and informal recreational opportunities are In the Immediate vicinity? A major park area exists just South of Maple Valley Highway . b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. If any: N/A • • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation - a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for, national. state. or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological. scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. If any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. Maple Valley Highway adjoins the property on ,the South , and Bronson Way N.E. adjoins the property on the North. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No . One-fourth Mile. . c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many • would the project eliminate? The completed project could have approximately 346 parking spaces and would not eliminate any existing parking places. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. • - 9 - • a. .Will the project use (or occur in the Immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so. generally describe. , - . ; No. • • f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated `bey. the completed project? If known. Indicate when peak volumes would ' See traffic study for the site. g. I proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Traffic channelization on Maple Valley Highway. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result In an increased �health caeed for republic schools.services oth(for er)? example: fire protection, police protection, If so, generally describe. Possibly fire and police protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, . . If any. None ' 16. Utilities electricity natural gas a. 'Circle ut ties current vellable at the site:e em, o er. ate an refuse servic elephon tart sews septic sys b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the Itility providing the vicinity whicice, and the h general ben needed. e or In the immediate i Puget Power Washington Natural Gas Renton City Water , Sewer and Garbage Pacific N.W. Bell C. SIGNATURE :• I, theundersigned,complete. state that to the best of my knowledge'the above information w formation is y true and on- � nIt is understood that the ficance that it might issue lead areliance uponncy this checklist declaration of' non-signs stiould there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. __// . Proponent: . . . . ' #e%h C. �ahh �. �� Name Printed: - 10 - :ax Legal description enclosing PARK PLACE site: That portion of NE 1/4 of section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington described as follows: Commencing at the east quarter corner of said Section 17; Thence N 89° 45' 17" W 1325.83 feet; Thence N 01 ° 11 ' 00" E 252.22 feet to the southerly line of the plat of H. G. White's Monterey Terrace Addition to the City of Renton as recorded in Volume 50 of plats, Page 36, records of King County, Washington; Thence N 89° 45' 17" W along said south line of Monterey Terrace and its projection west 571.27 feet to the northeasterly right—of—way line of State. Highway No. 5, also known as "Maple Valley Highway", and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 89° 45' 17" W along said right—of—way 41 .43 feet; Thence N 37° 43' 41" W along said right—of—way 148.88 feet; Thence N 02° 11 ' 57" W along said right—of—way 10.00 feet more or less; Thence N 40° 47' 35" W along said right—of—way 557.00 feet more or less, to the southeasterly right—of—way of the. "H—Line" on ramp to Primary State Highway No. 1, also known as Interstate Highway No. 405; Thence N 49° 54' 38" E along said southeasterly right—of—way line a distance of 448.54 feet; Thence N 09° 00' 22" W 86.02 feet to the south margin of Old Bronson Way; Thence N 82° 31 ' 50" E 115.84 feet along said south margin to an angle point at the southeasterly margin of Old Bronson Way; Thence N 22° 10' 50" E 78.74 feet along the easterly margin of Bronson Way; Thence, S 12° 48' 43" E along an extension of the west line of Lot 16 of Monterey Terrace 190.44 feet to a point of curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 360.00 feet; Thence southerly along said curve to the right 87.97 feet through a central angle of 14° 00' 00"; Thence S 01° 11 ' 17" W 287.61 feet; Thence N 88° 48' 43" W 10.00 feet; Thence S 01° 11 ' 17" W 452. 14 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. - • CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN • Im J Q * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: • APPLICANT: • • APPLICATION NUMBER: The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City . . Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. X4. BATCH NUMBER: CN - COMMENTS CUSTOMER NAME RAMAC vC gS *****Yc' ' Yc►cic)cYC****Ycuf*Y . . . . . . . . . ' YC*Yc)t*kicYLYc*.Y(Y<3L3 ' ' 'Y(**YskitfsssA7fta7t*fcsk�L*Yc$cfs4tit�:cfc,c�c3c)cft7 * 559210-0005-06 %���` �` ` }�`4���" 559290-0020-00 -- _, _ ____... ... MONTEREY DEVL CO 'INC 629800 HOUSER PAUL W E LILA. . C1077 10 BOX 653 57 MONTEREY DR NE ENTON WA • • 98057 RENTON WA 98055 r 559290-0025-05 559290-0030-08 SHAW DON LEIGHTON 0378 MILLER. KEITH D+FRANCA M 649999 63 MONTEREY DR NE 69 MONTEREY DR NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98056 559290-0035-03 559290-0040-06 GARRISON LOGAN WHITE W A 75 MONTEREY DR NE 31 MONTEREY DR N E RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0045-01 559290-0050-03 PARKHURST WARREN W 252242 . AMES ALBERT A 689999 87 MONTEREY DR NE 101 MONTEREY OR NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON. WA- 98056 559290-0055-08 559290-0060-01 PICKERING BRUCE B EXCuTOR DIAMBRI WM 0 107 -MONTEREY DR NE 113 MONTEREY DR NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0065-06 • - 559290-0070-09 WHITE RPISCILLA J 251082 DUCHESNEAU B E 119 MONTENEY OR NE 151 MONTEREY DR NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98055 559290-0075-04 . 559290-0080-07 RIVERA FRITZ P 1175 SHAKESPEARE HV 157 MONTEREY DR NE 163 MONTEREY DR RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA, 98055 559290-00E5-02 • 559290-0090-05 FITTERER MARCUS 679800 IGLOL KARL 241071 169 MONTEREY DRIVE NE 153 CAPRI NE RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA - 98056 559290-0135-02 559290-0140-05 PERETTI RAINIER 242994 KREMER MATT N C INEZ H ' r_ , l.n.,rrnr11 nn 41 UIf1AITGDCV f10 WC • ASSESSOR'S NAME . ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • CERTIFICATION I . hereby certify that theVe list(s) of adjacent property owners County Assessor as prescribed by law. their • addresses were taken from the records of the King ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington on ✓ residing at li a vv-- the day of • �4;�" SIGNED: CERTIFICATION OF MAILING , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site on I to each listed adjacent property owner as plan approval were mailed' prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washingtono residing at n the day of • • SIGNED: FORM _ . • '. ... • . - . '... _,, . . ' • . . . . . . t .. ' . „ -' • • 'i. ..............y......-• . • , . • •..... , . . ,,„.__•2,--,--••„:-...;:l.n <PP , • -PP.* -i''''' ..--+/'55*'' -''''`-•,.‘ \ *-----... - .•... . X '51,.' , 64-- , /...,, -it \. 7. ./ . -1 4. ,, . 44 - / ,A.• • gal I '"--i''' -..-"(..- - II I\ ii.// •t 1 • P " lit , • 'If ','t \ . . . , . • \ , 1 // y : I I • 1-IL • . . le u\ 1 , D.tk;9!,1.?,,9..t.:1--.,..- -- f Ci, , ...1 .. .• . ..4 , / l 1 Tie 1 ittos--•T .""IF " 0 . . , . , i t .., ' • A . . ; t f7.7--• --. r\' 1 •/ 1 '/ g3-•,,, , •,,..i , ) I '\ , . iq‘./...--• ...0,...(„. ,. . , ,. . ,, i•„,./...„4,.- : , ,..•:,„,„ ; .,/,:i*„7 ,. i .. . , ,./ / ..., . le f; •,:t.,-2.,:„.:,,,,-,I.,) .... / /f, „,/,'... - •//, •-.;/- ‘? \ . • / .:',.'i•-. .,'T,,•'-• )•• • -...-• / / I,/ . . fa ,.% • ../- f....,../-_,f:, - ,',,./. -,.••"; .• :, .. ef ../ ,/,"ve• ,-• i -.•,-,. I) • 0., .." . . 0 / ,,-,:, • - ,, 6. .-5, /,,, , ;',.. , 00.?. e,,,,-,/v• \ ''"7° ' ' / . 1.'.‘ qii..3.//o... ifi• „,•:.. ,'? '..., cN, ', '' /.//-4 tr. ‘ ‘ ' 24•J ,‘,/N, •cs/, '•/..•,• I.(... i. .... . . . . st'll ' „•'''' qkb:' n ,‘ ,,,.,\\,\,,,..).' nn'' fi .,.. ; . • •vz I, li; ... • • / ./,-0,.*/ -4•,%.,W • ,, • • , 4 ihst,.. • <- .. . , N .:,, ,,,, .,;,'••"..$1: . n •\ •;';';>"' . 4;• . • .g/7 v n?. 0:11..; • , '`... ..-.., • 4 . , , ,,,...e ,;.../-. • ' : ;ill l , . t /,-;' /:- ‘;‘• i.P.J/, , -, , • . , ..„ ' „•, • It. • , ,,,,,,, •••„-..,,,, ,s 1 ,„ .•••, /// -, A li 1. . • ..•.,,„• • , .\I \' "• '. /..\ ''' ' 4‘ , 7, A 4s,,..- 6„,A•.,,.‘ V\ •I '‘4/ / A&,,f/` //'• ' 4 i 1/ ' ...-. • . •, . .;:„"„fr,.(.',4' ir ,. •• , . ••!,S: , • . . ',, ,I ' '- / .'14\CON,•//)\.--;.."`;. .' .../4$0. '' a r. I•, . 1\ . 4,..;',r,,, ,.. r '(\f:' ' \ • •\ '''',5`;'-^. dPit' ' ' `c 1.;',,-.., * . \ If ' -.,,-, X .. . 55 $. ‘. ‘ '•.,/,\,.</>i, 4. „ ss..... CA .4,, \ ' 1,7. .'‘' 11., ....• 4t 1' . .g1,... I.. --',",..‘ ,./„...\_0 . ,,... , ,..,,, _ .., ‘..s. .„, s\s„ .,,/,11., ..,. ....:: c.7... !k tr„,•,,,, , -t •,, . • , -..„,. ,.. 1111 . • • \\. • , \‘'64(%, -. ,....,• ' ....' 0/: •,, .' ', .1; it! ... , . \ - ...%;.< \ .41;diL \\••%, .•' , ", ">../. ..,./„.„, , 'A if 464.014.4f, . .• ''',.' r.,.,A 1 1 \ \ , . \ ' , il . .. \ \ \ v , \.' •r / 4.;.4•°•';. ...y, ,-. /.. P:•: • r ,/,;,.. . ,- . , • ,,..-. . . . ... "....- ,„ . . .- ..s.,‘' A-/-f.,...f.' , k , ,v..,. \ '-'.:•?i." ' 1 I ''''''.".' '''. . .. ...:\ - ,.,,,, ., ,/, . ( 4-..',. /. `.‘ , n,.- . , '`/,. . p!, . •••••• •+.1$ •s ,s . • ..t )„. , i,!..,•,. - 'Oh '4''•;•' •• ` '/,,, .4441 • \ 4`.• Iv',(.4', •,,, ...s,s• ). ..., •,\ olit,I's, -,‘,•,• . k; \\ A'''' , 0 .i. /4 i• 6 •\. //, \, . , •... 'ii.., Irk:via ',0 [!•4 .f, S.A l' + \ 4t.4.-' s•••("•,%ie,y4\1 l'''•'‘. 1 . 4.. lc, 1vi— tfl,-,1J!0. • ,.., \\„, .,•:, ...,,, , ,•,, ,t .... \\•.\\ ii1 v< ::\...\\ Ii \'',;'''\4\4\iii.,.-,,,'„,,, ;•ss.,, . P' P.'. • r,1 \• \ ,\\\‘A y..;,:,.;,' ' ' . e i l •fil .• .. ). „k \‘, \.,,,,.;,;:,;,,,,'‘.., • a 4 61 • ,... ),.. , ! • • „\•,, ;... =A . ).‘ ! ,•ji ', lb'3:1 ..,‘, \ .„ t,•I ..v.:. \ ' \ 'X'...., , %. ::-.... . 11 b A i \ 1 \ r3 \t,:rd.n. / \\ .e.i... / ,,,, „..// 7 ./ ////' ‘.\ / .los... ggruigi CAMPUS MASTIIR PLAN Orbs:4•tes.6, Review:I:-- 5T: a '•c?..As i i WARREN LAFON NI DAO SHAfIE PROPERTY A APLIII VA IDHWAY OreVani Sri"- Cheeked: trpitai(7) ...., ,RCM, T 1150.1 MINTON.WAISNINCITON Job bib" Ciller"c,mc PROJECT NARRATIVE: In developing the site it is the intention of RaMac, Inc. to provide an attractive and capatible grouping of buildings and businesses which will add aesthetic appeal to this prominent approach into the City of Renton. The site is zoned B-1 which allows for a variety of commercial activity, however, the proposed uses will be a dining establishment, a hotel, and an office building. These three businesses are compatible in nature and it is anticipated that they will support each other economically, and will work very harmoniously together from the traffic and parking perspective. The development of the site will take place in basically two phases. The first phase will consist of the construction of the hotel and restaurant which is anticipated to be completed in the first quarter of 1988. The second phase will consist of the construction of the proposed office building which is anticipated to be completed by the last quarter of 1990. • • u O` • , . . . • • . . lg. . . i . .. -•--- H-LING _- 3 1105 CAN•P�AMP• © . o g .erne cr KVEriaNT I —•-- / / 1::. .--. l'�--I!/.-- :;' EI %� r' ti / �_ �.-s �� -- tee!_—._--- I . r _T- a 8 I I ,�°I9 11 4 ff.;•; -•::-. —�-1 OI 16T{LLS ;. . o $ , - - A � ti -- --_ ; III 11 I I � , • 2 \��1 1 Aid • - 9- HMO I I I / • k • I � --- • 1 s,...-.. I. ..,.. . ,._ = i ii- 7 I , / 1 . ..L......_ ii . . L .L I c' , -- 211 —14 i ,5 .q,. \ , il 0 zz •.._...__T-_,__.=___„ .. , • I \-_j_ I ) t ______ i 1; . I ' 1, - 1 . Ii 1 I =- — -I- 1. -1- - "- / ) / /If 'I I —I— r it! ___../6/.._..:,a4. „--", 24'_ ,2-7-.:_. 4.• '1: 1)L, 1 r I I / 1 �� i _ _—... — -- T - z . lo al 14gi310 .-§11-4,iPA tip 9< S �A d • • • il . 3 •rw_ Oiw_QI 5 #�u-- p • °40 , .;t ' 5 4 i""" .• • • • • • • Arn�aM� V ear4fLeTE TYpc L, •• C� -1 51Tt= .rLAIV aLYt t, CLOUD INN -ht'-MTON DATE N _ Jill NGYMOu7H• GWVtll aUMDATE a EN JOHN AMOEN90N AN ASSOCIATES PS. INC. • ma E!Si • o■aw wafture ow • OM ili 1 I I j\ IIIIII IIIIII n .1-71_7__n:::„ q ‘-- I; R-\ 2 H E. \ r i1 . II r ] . . _I-_ -� HIml IpH II ,-k Z 1 a 1_1,H 1 tilar..,..,...,_muur_.' 1"iiiiiK; 1_ • uum mil um L EL , ,, , ,, , , B E- ■ Imu 11111 IIIIIIIII ■ . ,1,„.I (S• I- • 1 HHHUI II --- � ti ., {iii ouw -/ __ — • 1-- IN . T - N WC z Rti II l i . NTRIciktaeklis - Nit rH 5 WP T E1.J:YATIQ. SILYLh GAUD INN- PENTON DATE , JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS, INC. INN ILL li • ham W...Mm WIN • P$maps • . . iii • • 1 • I 1 1l 1 . • _ \ \ . I 1 , , . {,-; , . , • , . 1. -1- , . , , ., , __ ........ ,..._ ,_ ,. i , . 11.. .. • ., , , ; . 1_.. ,_ ,_.... , N . , ; • ; , 1- li ] a ----, . . . . . , . . H l-,-- ; ; , _ . , - . 3 3 ,_ __, 1 J, . . . ]• � EE . I - 3 ] '- . . . . • I . . . . Illt • . . . , . . .__ 1. . . • E] —3 . 3 . . . . di . . = . E ] ] - . , , 1 . . . .. i i •• . . . . i • R �_ ___ . I= 3 3 . 1/41-P LI 3 3 .‘-- ,., .,__/ 4R ] 3, "3 ..3 H p, f ' hl / ' . i§ �j SOUTH;W[5T G,LYATIGNS 0IL- h CLOUD NN-1 NTQN . DATE JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS. INC. a ..ut a.5bi � 0 4. °, G3 © C=10111E © IT' S tale IL M • Maw rwgl.NW • MI Wall • Pt c . i 1 v • • • • rem.. N TN' W...D 'oYfc> 0 • 8 Q Y 1� 5 tiZ c • • F I_. .i- , oak get _c i 1 1 i i 9 4011°' \: .110' alf„'''''''"t"' ii......-........ iii . Ilion 21ii•\ / // .,',/,./.„ ,;/'/'//,.."..*, .:"...1 ..• './•4;'''. ,g 6 . . --n , . / ///,,,,,,,.....;2;,../,2.5....,..:„., • ,• ,, ,....••...,,./7 . 24 ./,,' /,'/>,•••;.• ,,,•:,z,:///.',00,,,,,,,,,,, imi.,_/.<7.;irjr),„# t .4-i , i 1 % ,f0,./..,./, / ,,,, ..,. . ,,... fr..... ,;..,.... I 1 / /,/ /j/ L J Iti• ,/•, '/ , Pir P eilik • . • //,<';, ..././.'/ 9- r, 'ri)iPi ,,.:ice. ; .. - ellf b. I— I - I ;I i - 1 I • {1 �IL.�P�Cl1�l1D INN- r TON °AgmIa, JONN ANOEASO(N� llAND I �CIASSOCIATES PS, INC,,� IJ ( �i - JIM HC ICUTn-cwt.."cwt.." Q Q U U L5 C LI A um ILL M • ____moos WM •, WO r JOIN AI OERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS, INC. MEMO: Silver Cloud Inn Renton, Washington Material Selections: Roofing: Homestead Roof Tile as manufactured by Monier or equal . Color; Natural Brown Building: Smooth finished stucco (plaster cement) or equal . Color; Parchment (light beige) Building Recesses: Vinyl siding, double 5"•:horizontal as manufactured by Flexlox or equal . Color; Warm beige Windows; Dual glased with bronze aluminium frames. • • • • 10620 N.E. W • kilivu, Wubinghn 06004 • I206 454.3006 knRIC14114611t • ; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 -112th AVENUE N.E.,SUITE 110 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H.BISHOP P.E. TELEPHONE 455-5320—AREA CODE 206 President December 4, 1987 4/87 �;r. Dan Shane /3A1 meme►�' president RAMAC INC. ( eau Rt 1/47 P. 0. Box 653 • Renton, WA 98057 Re: Park Place, Renton, Washington Dear Dan: Please find attached a schedule for construction of a traffic signal for the Park Place project. This is my best estimate at this point in time for a sequential process of obtaining the permits, designing and constructing the traffic signal. If this does not meet your time schedule we can start the PS&E prior to receiving the signal permit approval and/or we could preorder some of the equipment items prior to final approval by the City and WSDOT. I have left room at the top of the schedule for you to add the building permit application and construction process to see how the signal relates to your project. We have received the vehicle speed data for the Maple Valley Highway east of your site. It supports our assumptions for • meeting the minimum traffic signal ,warrants. We will submit the traffic signal permit to the City by Friday, December 11, 1987. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. Victor H. Bishop, P. . , President VHB:mb Enclosure RED'._'.:.:. . '- Liu/ SCHEDULE FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL . 11/3O/b7 SR 169 AT PARK PLACE RENTON, WA Prepared By TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. - Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul . Aug. Sep. , ; , I I I LDG. PERMIT I , , , , I I I j I I , , , , , , , ; ; I • , , , , IGNAL PERMIT t*s*4"®"m!Es00 .1 ' ' I I I I I I I I I , , , I I I I I I I I I GNAL DESIGN 1 I t••••4 ►••••••••H I ' I I VI (PS&E) T , I ' ; , , , , , , , , ; i ; ; I I I 'S&E REVIEW I I I imm1°• Imenimium I • I ' , , , , , , I I I I , I I ' I I , 1 I I I ' ' I I • ' SET CONTRACTOR : I I I I p••••4 ' , , , , , , , ; I I I , , , , , :QU I PMENT I I I I I founrowndr/rwrAm/ r//ouniworAmoumeAnir , ORDER , , , I , , I , I , I , I , , , , , , , , I I - , , , I , , , , , , , , ;ONSTRUCTION: I ' I I I I I ' UNDERGROUND, : I I ' ' I ' ?,AnollinoUgOIKOUMOUnins ' ROADWAY I I I I I I I I ' ' ' POLES. HEADSI I I I I I ' ' ' I / ' CONTROLLER I I I I ' ' ' ' ' • I I I I I I I I I I 40 - TURN ON I I I ' ' ' ' ' , , , , , , , , , , Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May _ Jun. Jul . Aug. Sep. (EY DATES .......N4 TP&E V Submit signal permit to WSDOT Dec. 31, 1987 ....."1". CITY OF RENTON Signal permit approval by WSDOT Jan. 29, 198811101110111.114 WSDOT - Submit preliminary signal plan to city Feb. 15, 1988 Wnr./UMOUK CONTRACTOR Submit final PS&E to city / WSDOT Mar. 21, 1988 Final PS&E .approval by city / WSDOT VApr. 15, 1988 Order equipment May 2, 1988 Equipment delivered Sep. 1, 1988 Signal- turn on Oct. 4, 1988 • HE/Dskl AG12887 7 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M. : DECEMBER 8, 1987 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. HENDERSON HOMES Application to rezone approximately 2.8 acres of property from G-1 to R-1. Property located at 4922 and 5020 N.E. 20th Place. File Nos. : ECF-069-87, R-077-87. HENDERSON HOMES INC. . DIVISIONS 3. 4. 5. AND 6 Application for preliminary plat approval to subdivide 43.71 acres of property into 170 single family lots, and two variances to allow two pipe stem lots. Property located north of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and east of 142nd Avenue S.E. if extended. File Nos. : ECF-067-87, V-075- 86, V-076-86, PP-077-86. RAMAC. INC. Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. restaurant and 40,000 sq. ft. office building on a 5.696 acre site. Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. File Nos. ECF-049-87, SA-054-87.• • ec1ot Ix e 7 - RaMac, Inc. November 13, 1987 Ms. Jeanette Samek—McKague Senior Planner Building & Zoning Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: RaMac, Park Place, ECF-049-87, SA-055-87 Dear Jeanette: This letter follows our telephone conversations yesterday and today regarding the tentative date before the hearing examiner for the above referenced matter. As I indicated today, the best date for us would be December 8, 1987. I will check back with you in the next ten days to see if a more sure date has been established. Hopefully the 8th will be suitable to all parties involved. • . Your assistance was much appreciated and I look forward to meeting you within the next few weeks. Very truly yours, RAMAC, INCORPORATED Helen G. Klann Administrative Assistant RENTHEAR RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392-4199 •`:`t 4, tb CITY OF RENTON nLL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 26, 1987 Dan Shane 20919 S.E. 34th Issaquah, WA 98027 RE: RaMac, Park Place, ECF-049-87, SA-055-87 Dear Mr. Shane: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your site approval request for property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway. The Committee on October 21, 1987 , decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 •on-ramp traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6, 300.00 for the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the ramp. 2 . That the applicant shall be responsible for designing a new traffic signal and having it installed at the • existing entrance to Park Place. It will be the applicant's responsibility to see that the new traffic signal is coordinated with the on-ramp traffic signal to I-405. The signal design shall meet the City of Renton' s existing equipment. 3 . That the applicant provide a crosswalk across the Maple Valley highway at the traffic signal. 4 . That the applicant be responsible for the off-site improvements on the north side of Maple Valley Highway along the project site frontage on Maple Valley Highway. . 5. That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 October 26, 1987 Page 2 6. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 7. That hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 8. That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with. the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. 9. That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings, on the site. 10. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant) from upland properties, the applicant shall provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing canopy trees around the parking areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building and Zoning Department. 11. That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end November 9, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will (finalize it's Determination) unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the —'/5finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the . October 26, 1987 Page 3 comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner for your site approval. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague.- :23c- 5 F e Environ al eview Committee. J Donald K. Erick , AICP Zoning Administrator DKE: CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director • October 29, 1987 Dan Shane RaMac Inc P 0 Box 653 Renton, Wa 98055 Subject: Environmental Review Committee Decision Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find a signed copy of the recent threshold determination of the Environmental Review Committee that was referred to in our previouscorrespondence. If you have any questions please call. ce yours, . . Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:plp:p1021 RECENED !!0'; 0 2 190 inn �►�;n Aupnm,a Cn„th - RPntnn Wachinotnn O 2A66 - 'lS-7S4f CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-054-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq.ft. resturant and 40,000 sq.ft. office building on a 5. 696 acre • site. PROPONENT: RaMac,Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse-- impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , November 9, 1987,in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 DATE OF DECISION: October 21, 1987 - EFFECTIVE DATE: October 26,1987 nald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer uilding and Zoning Director Policy Development Director • Ri rd C. Houghton Pub is Works Director .14* i\\ RECEIVED NOV 0 2 1981 t . { DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ai1:i°rrt;' 1 b�fs ', `.,V.•• PROJECT: RaMac, Park Place ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-055-87 ti.... DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. restaurant and a 40, 000 sq. ft. office building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. CONDITIONS: 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 on-ramp traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6, 300.00 for the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the ramp. 2. That the applicant shall be responsible for designing a new traffic signal and having it installed at the existing entrance to Park Place. It will be the applicant's responsibility to see that the new traffic signal is coordinated with the on-ramp traffic signal to I-405. The signal design shall meet the City of Renton's existing equipment. 3 . That the applicant provide a crosswalk across the Maple Valley highway at the traffic signal. 4. That the applicant be responsible for the off-site improvements on the north side of Maple Valley Highway along the project site • frontage on Maple Valley Highway. 5. That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 6. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 7. That hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 8. That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. 9. That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the site. 1i, :Mitigation Measures =1 :1 1RaMac, Park Place ' Page 2 10. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant) from upland properties, the applicant shall provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing, canopy trees around the parking areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building and Zoning Department. 11. That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. 17M1^` ;rt, -♦ F , .k'r . rr]:: 'C; `` 1 �,Y 1 .1', T_ c.) 1 . :*ii ram - �f'/ �,• ki I 1 I i I I I 1 S i I I 1 1 i\\ 1 1 1 I 1 1 t • ! I I I I T� ► I 6 ... :� 0I to uc•. I ( )I`` , I _1. �1 le _14 .1.. ; cortica---P.:.1.77,:?_ ..= • o. it t. t 4 fi SF�'9 1` * 1. . Fn+� ,c , I t • x TZL1. a ..„(011.• -;••.•,.• .;:‘,.). t Y.-^. I 1 47, I t., j1.1 !a :. 'cI 11 cbr'.5 � 41: 4 14°' .• , ,::. .._---, lik .....s , v _ _ 17tz1 V6 _.___.._._„. //zl-101•Wraioui ""..A. nu N L * .,c P> ' b • i4 150' ST'ORAVE ; :: ___., .11, 4 S,„„:0, , . . . "I . . / . PRo PosED PA I DRNcwAY ii . .1 \ . \1>;•/' .. - . • I 10 c...a.z.t i , 1/4. _,I . . • kUl. 1-.- • , . • 1 i I 1 vy-\ / \A \'l \ .. • • a .,, \•.....,1 -.—s. \', • I ,. ..,,,K, i rt 4, I I 1 1 i ! ! . I 1 '. ....1 _ le ,...4,.'"' •,"." \. :... • I 1 14..: `7-'—'1.2-4.3 L —r1 --I ../..-1. s . .. — .-— •, ,, . • SNN :-,-;..• "*:, A, • •-,.. • •.• . <O.._ cr•ct. • s' ‘ 4 : S. ;,41. -.. • _ 23- \eo - - -..- -L . • ‘ .... - -.. _ ",- 0 . . : \ ....._- -,. •--- • \ --- , • . „. .7, •.. ——. • .., i••:'i• . . • 3 . . . , •,. 4•:, ,._ dip ....,%.:. ,.......•gm.: em.• r, '' ....,,.... • .,,, -.... .... .1 \ t • ——.—.. -- .....— —••• ..— \ • .1 I I ‘ *.." , r I V: 7 140 1 1% i 1 ! I ! I I 1 I 1 I I ' ‘ I< ' , 1 -+- ,I •._- 1 14, 1 I 1 I 1 1 I c1.4t ..,...... .........,... : ——— 7- 1 • ••••...lir%V OD...i.. ..1... 4 -••..•.40.P. ............,t . .1. ""--"-- ‘,.. ."‘. • s OP .... . ."...f. .., - ... ... ., •s •• ...... ••••• ...... .• .• .... •••... ....• . •• ••• .43.\-- 2' ''..... ..... ......mu.= cm... ....• ..... ...... a... ...• .... 14b•Se t •4-7- — --.— — ..... „....... _. _. _... ..... ....... , ..... _. — _ .....__ . _....._ _ _. _. _ ...... • ••• , _._ . . is.. yl • r::"_IlirAt—S. 9 10 Iii. :IAA p -id-- . amm".t4nk"T L. t • VAL .i.. E..T -k-het-14- N A. Ti- ,. 0-- • ..)' C A • ' - - . . ...m. ........ . . ....m. • ....omm. ..m...... ... . =...... ....m.. .. m.. ........ Ns N N •• • • N . . . .. • . . . ... 14. .. • TR INF F lc. ci &NAL cor-icEPT Puzer4 . .. . , . . • • . .• „N. / • sa 14, ..." ,,*,,• RaMac, Inc. October 19, 1987 • • Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Park Place Site Plan Approval Dear Mr. Erickson: • I appreciated speaking with you last Thursday concerning the status of the site plan approval for our Park Place project. It was my understanding from our telephone conversation that everything appears to be in order on the items of reconsideration from the Environmental Review Committee and other concerns of the City of Renton. We are anxious to receive the final site plan approval in order that we might start construction as soon as possible. Please advise us as to the status of this matter and when you anticipate the final approval will be forthcoming. . Very truly yours, RAMAC, INCORPORATED Dan Shane President DS: hgk RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392.4199 RaMac, Inc. October 13, 1987 Mr. John E. Webley Parks ' Director City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Park Place Site Plan ECF-049-87 Dear Mr. Webley: Enclosed please find your signed copy of the agreement between your office, Gary Norris of Traffic Engineering, and Dan Shane of RaMac, Incoporated. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Your office staff was most helpful and. pleasant. Very truly yours, RAMAC, INCORPORATED Helen G. Klann Administrative Assistant hgk Enclosure RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392.4199 tMac, Inc. Aapettme44,1( Y-6 • October 9, 1987 "Tragic c �"' PI��C�`� Cac R.p ' fl z//7 --� 1,:fewl 10 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 • RE: Park Place Site Plan ECF-049-87 RaMac Inc. Gentlemen: With respect to the above referenced Site Plan Review and subsequent reconsideration, the following has been agreed upon by the parties involved: 1 . RaMac, Inc. shall be responsible for designing a new traffic signal and having it installed at the • existing entrance to Park Place. RaMac, Inc. will see to it that the new traffic cig_n31 is coordinated with the on—ramp tra is signal to I-405. This signal shall be designed consistent with the design standards and existing equipment of the City of Renton. 2. The City of Renton, Parks Department, shall contribute $35, 000. 00 toward the new traffic signal . 3. RaMac, Inc. shall be responsible for improving the north side of Maple Valley Highway. 4. The City of Renton, Parks Department, shall be responsible for improving the south side of Maple Valley Highway and any other work deemed necessary on that side of the highway by the Traffic Department. RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392-4199 • • Page Two October 9, 1987 Environmental Review Committee • 5. RaMac will also provide a crosswalk across the Maple --�j Valley Highway at the traffic signal . The above has been agreed upon this _ 6__ day of October, 1987. • an Shane, President RAMAC, INCORPORATED 27/01/14:4- Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer TRAFFIC ENGINEERING City of Renton John E. Webley, Parks Director PARKS DEPARTMENT . . City of Renton • ' " •4,.-i.....••••=iPt.7;Pi:•:-Zzx' : '.• :,-...•,,,4=.c,,,,-,:s.',.•:::,,J11*.z.'.:-'4,. .w4,.,fi. --,._.-,---„,•-•:*-N4,4-04-4-"4-*_,,,,,Izaista-WAA....1 -••.,41-4500•'''*.:0 ,..,,.,....,.i *..,:ririz,--,4f-J,%.f,"ii:Vit-11:•-11,4600-1.tliStg,-141.1h,,Ir*, --PItIfftvir.row.%ti,'.;,‘rgezo,N - ,,,...„,„ -.,...444;;:,44,4-,.d.104-14e1.-1.1%44':Afiie,Vwf•k14,,A.Nzak=r1V0.,Kid..Nz,V.-•N%';'.',fi',1'';,, ?''.. .,A9,44•;;V,41; -----1-:,-,:•4;146-iviifigitiglitliot‘whiti*,14144424mAki,,Rhvt-t*-tAreiv--?t.itfF• :-. .y.,,:t '-as,.!,:,'!... ?..5....:4,'--i-i,:s4Ai. :.,a,.:4, '' •=,.-,=.,•,=:,-;',:i4w,,',.•!Pit-'4,•:,,Kflr,,,,v,(44.1.4--.47VsfrOgo•-•...t-taffii:1'..-3:4*-4•;''''',-.4.,•-r .m. ..it?,•:'-.'.=';t-W3.i::,-..5,-,-:,•7•3,,,k-i:,..a,,,f,••--,,a-i', ..1,.-4...,•;:t;',7-,„,:,,:.•;;„,,,-iv.,-..iii.,,,,ii...: , . .. .:.•,..„4„,„,..ip..,.,,,,,--,:,,,,..-.,:;;:kt;.1,-.WitkitiV44,,4,1•‘,_,`A.:4-41211,3-14kifitit-4419,to:4-41,vg,..-..-to.44,,,i,.:.,kff;.c,,IN;hii,•.;.gcsik... t..47.-•;,.?, -;.-',..V.%:.ii*.•3,/,.;'•;111....1:5):-.4I'..1.5iglk'?.2-.1.:::•-.9.i'-:-'2,:n::.'=*7-.,4i'sgl-.51.'i,4-tz _,.,:..-..,L.,;::-.,..Ai‘:.,j;...L,..•,-.tiiv:r--4,iiii ,-.%.14„inkf:Atorkiii-tx-k-zt,-,,a):!-110.`A,,m4,:1-11.::41:::-.:-Nk..sxg,,,ve-J.7-.',-..r.i.5":Y..?;i'm.-4-Ys-,qa-,-.. 5.- t?::•-:..-,' ! -.:-:6t,,-;:;.::?,'pl:i:.t.w.1.-z',k'; ,,,;r7:c.#...g'§Uif..?':-. .1:q;!ci;I!,..7... 1.-,:,..-..-1•.,.. .',;i:::: F:`,.-i. . : :.-i-i..-.'.,:•:2....:: :,-,".:-.._:-.aly-.-.: .;: :::-;.,3-;--;?-.--.(,F,,i.-..; .'.I;.., ..- - - : '' ',!:4:ij.:A'':iI'Ri.'rfP , ,.,....,-..:. , -.44 , ; ,q,,. .i--:..44...-:.':!,' ..)„,, ,...:,.-:giii:'. ... ,,4.'-.1 ''A"" 4.,.,t-,',.f,'i-r'..'';,-;'... ,,4.':'.. ..-A-,16-1.-ii:,..' ;,1,-; A.-i.';.;,-..,..i':',345,?!.:,;.',./:-? !..!'....i';' t.:-.4....1,-,N.:':-.:,6,-.';':::.1-,,-;',..,,t, ,:,:..°,,,,•,:. ,' -., ,,,..:'j..viii,-.5.v.,:3- ;isf, :...4'si - ,'.!--, , , ,..',-.. „..-',.';fivt -„..0AL li.- .,''i',.„!•,;7;:':;4-, ..,,.N1-.;;.ii - i :.)4f.k.'::•;,. -' ..,.aff-.:4,V:,',:•*:';'i'i:-',V.:. . "J:si:.'•:';'''. .;;;:ri'ifritk,.'2;;,':''.4.1.,',.-,-.V„ ri•;;-;::f; ,,--.:,.;;;,,.:_:',;:T.',.;'V'' ; ` '4":-----'..-4,-'•':-';': •!::-.., ,.'-Y.'-li;•-!-;,2, ..,. ,;:::• ,:, ',:::•,',',-:':-s..fi.V'•-• •' 'i.f.,„,::. . .174 13Lin::1-71 :i'cqii,:e-iBir ,''i:!:.:4-ki:1•;''.1ft:-;'!f'-',i,'S'.10:ki:).-:...:b•!:, ,-' ,'-:: - ''"";:' ...:!i'' 's'i-,1':::, ,,';',.'io,r ,.-„7 0 .','-;('-',,' ,. ,:: :-.:.':'.:' :;,?,:i1.7-'-.:4-',' :::•Z:,..71.'.: :,41;7112',,,.'i'-11, ,,"-,;!4 -,4),A.,:i•--,,,;„,,,,,,.:.:;,,,,td,7_71:.,:-:,..,,,. ., ,•/; ,•; •,, -, '',.:---;...::s,i,4=....-:•:..9., .,-i,. .:••,..-, L',*•1':',..,. .....f41-4-4 „;',.i.:A.',:;;':;_ i'Vi:',4•14;-"ji';;..4.=',.N. ,,,,,.,...•,,:_....;-_:,...-cN ..s., ,„_,,,,..41_,T.,,,,,,,,,;,:,,i . .-::.,_:...i---irizrv„4.:::,1•P.-,y.%-•,1;s.:J,',':.'•••':,,--- li,:,.•-':.--',.: ',••••`--....;!k.-,:;..?;::.:•f-_;',•,,,*:.'. .i:04.4;a.:4:0'--6-11,-;- A•;;;;',i.;.•.;:;:1-.....m ,,,!.,44?...-!..• •;;.;•fy.-,- ,,,,•;:i.:•.*?;•-?.;!•,4•,:',.,‘(,,-•,:,;',;;t=••,::••4•.-..,•-•'.•:,,,i. -•..;•:.•,,g;:',..:',6":,'J:•: :-..:.-';:: •:7=• •=ii,• ••V•;'.'••••: ?,,,n'';:r.C1:,::g.,:ey: it.....,.- (-.4- ..,--;., ,7,....,,,„.....4,..i_ sy.,,:.=„143„.1,1,,..,,;t,,...;=..-,-;,_,-=,-;,-1;v4s-,1":-,,c,,,..-.::,,,:,-,-;-•-_,,= "5:-,,,,E",..••.:•4;::7.,,;•=1.,...,=;.'-::;„ ..-,,,•-•_,.;: •,,.:,,,,;.:!,ig,,I,..,:::•.,...., ;,.,:,..4••;•:,,,,. ;;,4,-3N ...,'.••••-,..'4}..•,„,c;-;0.:;., .:-....-„. 3- •..,.....,::::;.a.:::;',•;.:4:13,;.i..-.-,`::;:q...ct',,,I.:2:74:::,. .:,;,,,.',,i:i.:,';' ,7',..,:!......:A. ..:.:f. ,,,,:.i: . ...: .„..k1,...r.,--,/,',t-f'z'j . er. ,-°.;:,41)..1?.';'1.'2:I -`4- .F1,_ 3. .'ll . ,,;;;"..,-- ,J,.i.?,,!1-t.±'; ,1:.;z:•/;::.;glie. : , ;-- .,:: '.• ,...,'''.'1''' . ., ..f-i. ..',41541?itglf:;:V:::'3,::4i'L.'• , . .4-.; .‘'e. : i ''tt‘;'fj;'-i: '"..2;.-. -kfo-VO-1,4-.4q...-,i-7.,1;-:C:z.:10)" `i .: ."'4.P1..- -....-'.-N?,`-.i:',2: :'''''.':':i''3- 4' 4?•:Z--',.?? .,k-:•. 1.?!.;--1-,.;,--.i.iV'..-f.•-• -i‘ ' ''''..---.,`,`;It.'.'„'4,1'-'rf.;;:,4:S::..,i--:,t-.Yi6§1.-ii , ... :..',.., .-,,,':.?.i.,', :-'.-:";.;.:ft!'''..';'--', :::'•...'''..?...;-!:;.,..;'•••:.7-':,,,, ---, ,'..;';', -irg.f.z ,.=.z1.A5-.„ , , ;,r1I 1- ,- . . - I f,, ,,,,r,..-t,s,,s,-" ,:it':',: -.,,:,- '::,:,.:{...•J'.';',:i:.,,',.,-,-Pii:r r.,, , r,:,:-.ci.:•0110 ‘-14 ,,,,,,12,-t:41.'.1ii..iti.„4/4,311trtw.i,i...!;.5,.!Pi,,I:J-z,,, . ,,..,-, .:.:0 .,„--,--;,7s,-: .„-r,..,,,,,f:....5,i;-,(,F..'„, c-): , , : .•:: : 4 . ,'4,:. . .. :', ,:-,.1,..';',,...„:;.';',- ;.'Aic;g:'-`3;ti,..1:-!,4 f ----&i4i1g i ..;.41. 71.-40 :',.".:,4:,,„.,4 ......•,: ::;.;',,:::':?.''', ',-'f):..f':';' :::- ..iTT.=.--A:i,,,‘,ii,--.:::';'...:jp": `-fi, ! WA' ":,.i.''-' ';''' ' ...i',zif'gW' :'`'-':I' .':Lt'''.,rgt*:'ii,t44 53...-_,,, •,r4 ''':--ii':',...t ,,,....,'-'4.-1,,.:.'„gt'-i....., ,,-',...)... ..:-.!.:1 - '..:- -W.V.1.-,:'.,4.:2;,:i-!--.-,-P';';-.7,":,::::-JF, ';;',7',.-..,':',... ....-::.',-,_;‘:....„.,::::,,..;- -;,,,:c ,i,;;,. .,,.,.,,...;;'...,...0"...:-.1,:,: -..,-,,,,,::..,,.,,,•:,'::,..1;.i.„.11,:^,:: ::::.,.-,-,,,...•,..,:• ••.?:4.:...;i1.1,7,:::,,..;:,',i,.,:i.,-.i. ..;,•;i'is.7, 4.::,!,. , ..;:^,;],,''.,,..,•:,„..V.y...<,,..., _ . .... .,::..0,:.--:..7....,-f-..7,7.,.- .•„'••••V 7-'...:0•;' .:. ,,,,, .-',/.:.:,;;;;;:',':.,::.,,,..:..!--...,.'•',., ..,..,,,r.:-., ,,'''.1.;':.:.,,.i.3 .4:....,!t....!:-.;•!.C.I.,T4:- ..,;.:',.. .. .•,.,1,......1')..f':: :::':'", :,..:L'',J,,., 0 '';• -',.''';,!..';t-! ' )2'.„,,,1:; , , r.:;;,2"1,:..q'..:';'..`;:'1''',-"-';'1:,'AITO.-i, .P 1 : ::r,I.,),-•::4.;‘,: ;?:._ .- .`,.-..'- -F',..:Y.:-. .'.'i:::!:: ".: _`;:::-.1'"•:''',:',:;-:-:.*',::::::',,'I' ig;',..,",:,-;,-,,P.;,•-:_:4,-„se,!,-W-,-;.,-1-- -, ,,..,:,.......;......, ,.-!.., ,.-2..,,;:?,'„ ,;..':Y :::- --,:,:,,,,:r‘:,2.,::•.,...:;;,:::::f-,,,,,, ,r-z:,:....•,..-,iti' liii'iii if:in:::; '','`41?''',7, -.,11 -L:i.:46) .,,''.;'•.:i'--2EIT-0 -.U.!ri;...,':.:....':;ii.';::,,7..,;,-.-ff:',.,'";"'g:!..4":1';,.Vr,:,:,-,-.'-: ••::-.1',...":, ;:'.,';:%,•.';',:,.::',.;„-.:.,:•:-:,:,.., :,-.;:,-;*--):5;,-.,;,T.:::.,:,:',.-„'„:;,;.;,...;- ::',-`..";: 1.,..„; ,- :;114'. ..,.; =: -;;''::' ' :' ''.'t '!--`!.•;.;: :::),4'..-:i.O., .:-.;-.5::..;":-,3...:',"::::•,;.V'!..!,..',,..;-,:-.:;:;.;,:.:;. ..:-i; 2 ,'-..-,;.i.4'?„',Ei•1-',:.:i,:.':::;.,.r..:',:::".'?'....,: ,.. .....;:,... ",.:',. ;::-..'-',.,:,.".:,';;.Y.,:,...":;;,'",:;:-..,''.',i',.:_,.:-.;',;!:-;'.,...:::.'1.'."..f":;.;'.::,.:•,:.:.:.',::::',.,...' ' ';',r;,: iTD.,,,-,.:.--;:'.7.:::::,..,',. i...,...,..;; ;,.-.:- .,;...,i._...2::::::.,:-•-•:::;...-:'../.;;:,...,;:-:;,..,,:;-,....,:,:-; :'-....--,i;.'-....::::;.---,..:::-,...,".:::-:,,:i:,::,;..::' kf;tr..;.....-:-.:,;'.,!",,TE,'-.,.:=Y ;_,;;,:'.,:i.:,...„-,':,.f..-:.],......i...:X.-'-,.: :::-,:',2 ., :-'i:';',:r.'.;:.'!'..1;",.t.:-.''Sft-..'-',.'"::::1,•:-r.,.--:,.:=4''''-',"'i'• .'-:°:'.;:,.?,..; ,'",-L'.:•-or,,..-;41:1 IF4.;f1.94;71,.,;40...;,>4 ,,-tn',Z..--.... ..8,„:1-,1 ,-,....,:,:,,..-,!.:.,-...:-.,..',.7.--..-,.:::-.,'. ...‘.::.:-:;,.:..,;..-;',,;--".':, :..--,''---..:'.-i----1:..-':. :;'.. -.)-,'-, ,, : ,.-::,:r t-:.,,,-;',:,,,. -,..-,Q,,,..'.p.;,:',.,.-",.: :.:.--::-,...---,-.,',...,_::::.,:.,;:;:.,--.•- ,,,,,,;,,,,:,.,;:,..,.:':...:..,,,,,,,,:,-,4,7'.-;:::-.-3,-.•;',,..:- .-?fr7't.-L.?''',1...;':'.',,';;:-.":-4:',-"''','."...,c„. 1•6.-..-‘,.....r.,:-.0 ",•.=,..:-;:,->a..7a:in ,-..-.:."::',..,;''.::-..%-s.,...:-: -,..'-:,;15'...:',;:ij...-.:.;.•,; ...-,...,...:-.:','..' %:,..:-":_,...:-.:'-',:;-..,.,,,'..: ,:. '• •'.., ',........-v., . P...''..,v,t 1.:---3'.,,‘,:-;,.'i..;:-.,.::,,-,'-,:-:7.:,.--!':::-.'• .--;.A'=":-.'-:',';'-:',i.',.:'.I.::.--',--,.'. :7,.:.--!,'::::.-::';j';',..i:'•:.',n':,-::''.-:''' ''.!'---74'' . - ''-itli4 f.u2.s,.:''.4.3—"4tif ''::::'.7•'.."-:-..-`,.:,...'-':":-.:. •'''.'';'-'. ',:i.-:::,;:.:_.".--;....':' .2,:..:':...'lc"::- '..",,:":,.:',';,',.,':`,.':',;.:..'7,'''''.:..'''.::;..-::: ':::-, ''--,,,J.....-:.A':.: ',-':.:z.].-..:-..:' '',.-,-.,,,.:.,•;.-:;.':-.. '',.-.'...;....,. ,s,-.:-;:.:-.:,;,:,.-..'-.!::2-.:-''_'--,''.-.,.`='..;.:,,--.Y.-,.,..-.••.:, .,:. ,-.:.:-.;.:-,.:,•:.''':,.'„,>'.71-;-1)::-.. •;'„° .1!‘:Ti 0 143 ..4b -:''-.:.''3 : ' ''.- 1:- :- '''.-.,` ---..!:'-''•:'.-:;:,.•. ::-::'-':..:'.'''."'...;Y.: .'.,:-'-..'.' .•-:,''',..i.,:...4..-:':'::--,,J.-'['',`7 1 '."-''.2.'..'..',, ry-1 :-:.•:.;,....-?.4 •-,:,,y.•.:.:,,.:',i.- '.,..7•V:,,P,.','',.,..f.f'. '.•' e>., '...•'‘,..f,'`,..'..L ,.;.. :-• ''...' , ..... ....." '10...13 7,-- ...,-- . ".1.3 '0 . '.0 . `.A (0,1 .•::, . --.-.-.;:': ‘;'',,, .-:.:,•,v :'-:-...--:' '... — ;?, '• -.•."'-..-::....,.,:.,,..-:-..... .-,". ',.'.-...1 „. . ..•:.:-,.•'.. • '''''.5.. ''.'''.,.,",".:.•'.- ...('''... 'r,,• '.'0 1 1 ;11 ....,to -, .,,,-;-,•:-.,...:.' -.•!:!.,::---.--,:*-,::--..•-', -.:,..--.,-:,,- ...-;`,j', t-,--':::,•,--... .::',••,..';.:'.:,:,...--.•-•:-.-.:.,::`,;:-), .•_ ,' ,,.2 ,,;:: ,,..,. ., -.: '.:!:-•,,..,..,,- ' .'... ..,-,..,.': ,. , ,,_•-•-',-ii-,.., -, ; - -,(:::,:.,,-.2.,I.:7:ic ,.f.F:4-:•-•,0,'.,S.:1-.4i ;0 ,1i 4 13) -.':-•,,...2 .glj",:g5::,---' •'-7:',-:!:-1-.' (13- : ::. ..-' :"--1.:. :-:,,`-. '.: ...,::':-(.;::..''.'. '''', ."-:',,,..,:::- ,7.Yi,..'ji :: :;'-;:':"°'',.0 ' 'r's .11-9..:6 0 't 1 .. - •:;:.:;:° i-..q."7 .:,:.'',':------ ''. --,: f „.• :':-=•,.,:.., :,,,,i...,. •-•-•.,-,;,... ,.• :::•..;,- ••._•••-;•• •i,,4 .•.1. •:i, ••'-1,,-0=,..;17:3 44'7113;•'.0 1,1 , •;.'• 0- .-,0••'•,•J.,.••:,.:-,-,.'...1.4. ..•.- ..' •:-..-:•'',.'.= ••=••••• --':-•,;...t,•••-1,..'•••„', .,;•,— :.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:,,.:.:,, ;• •;-,;.,::,--: ; ';__,,..;,,k••••••••• ;::. •.. ' '‘'••,-_ '. = .,",... •,..,,..L :„. ,; .....:., ,!.•-,=:,••.,,`). ./,.•,.;,,,,,,,,.!,1- •..,,,,,,,.. .".-;::',f,i-In'io ,4 .,+•'_ict-Act '„..0 ,10,,.. ..••0 ro :"."-•s •••: ;.. "-;..•.= •. ,::-•.,----=;-='„,-':.;.,-..'-:•••••'''•=•_;.:•,..;i:';,-..=..,;-::'::, ,,;,,..i•-•..•.:.,=•-..4 ',,:.•''.--„,-..,:',6...••',..., ,==.,.,,.;w:',1•,',.,.,.:. •,..,.'.; ..,•;, '-i :•;.-:.:•-*•::'. ;•-•;.,••=f,, .' ''1-. .*: .,.•.. ...;.',•.•::;:-'-,:.. :::•••••.•=•,•-. •-,', ,',.,•'=",-.;.=::..'-i'l.:13 '••• ••=',..r"..:` '•P--,>: 0):4.7).Iii'',II..«1'94-.II‘ ...:•,,..,:•-7,6..'..-liks ..-'','-',:-.:.•-'..- '•:'':ii-,..-•.;•,..-,'::::.----!?!.y:.::--,...-.:,-,-•.,...i.,,-----,-:•,,,.. .....,-,-, 1.0 •:,:::.,,,••••••:.,•!...:,6,-..4,,, -4:'':;''','i z-•'-', .,•.-..•• ,--•-',' -'-',.:--...,,.'"..--,. -'..--::;-.,::'::::••'••:',...,:;•:,-::,:,,s;:,-•.,.-:..„,_..:::.'.."--:,;,- -.- ---.';•••.:',:_,-•;-';-In • e.'ai''' -1-j".:4.! ii) ;:i.1„43'" ','.: • ?-4,,,j ', ‘,.,''-';,-„.'; ,.,:,:1:43.,,,- ..-:',....-,:::'-:::-'.1;;••':.,-21:':',...e.,'„,, ',!,.::cf,,;,;:',:.,:,-,..!,-.-;.,.:;.,;.,,c".1 ..::,;:.--•!,,•.:',.,:.y'..!.,..,-,... . ' '' ''''''':''''''. ''-':-..i•'•''S''' '' ':24:. 14'N '';'i '':- 44'2:7:I;';' .111):;° t1‘-,:.:'id.1:11:.;:`_."'"..:,,';::::';',':••;,,,..•••,',.''.:,.."=,:•," "•-::„.'i;‘,==.•:-::::•=-:.'''''':=',.::.••,-..-'.=',,,'•",•,' 1%;'••,' --:.•.;:.:•..-6••;',.;,•,-,,,2'•:::.=.c.:...-..., ;=.;-:'','•:,'::,,;.:c2;•-••,,•;..;•:::;.,.,,". ,,,,,,•••• •=;,',-:',:;;:;:`',.'';-' -,•',-L"..,..'. ..',-•-i-,.,,.'1-,.,''. •;';':'..:,••-f::'.•'='!;;;,,:[:,;==;;;.;;,,..io '.';:.,:?;••.-,•-'-'1,-,;L,f_ry/r7.1':,p.,-to ,+)...,..,-E-0--:,;0 r.,;q ,..i 0;;-",1.,.'!+1,'.".••••:•,s -0f',0_:,.`:',;.,..:1',,ii.c::-;',.."7-1:,::..'::;',;:": :' :.. .'...•;,-... .,':',::::.:',.',-..!,:.,,:.:,':',;;'..-..",:;::::.:-.:...,',,'.: u1;,.:'-' 'i....q:.::. ;.7; -.:....2 `:-;'.....': ',;?..1,'. .s.:;.;-::::,.:.:-.,_....e. ',..:-.'::. :'.-,,-, .;;,- -,, ....,'4.:::,..',7-,.:.. ,-.i;--:-... -,:-,,,-.'-r.,,,::,,,:::,..!.„..,-:::::,os,,p ffs 143 :,.:-:, i.. ,-........,:••-c•.,:..p,,..1...t)r,-:...,.,7y. :ti ,--;,,ti - L..::.,:::. ,„,-..„,--5,..,\..„, ..„,,,,,,,.,,,-.,..„:„:„..,,,.,,-,..- .-;.•,:s.,:.;:,,,..,.,3-j,2:-•••- „,..,,,.,,:,.....,..,, ,,,.,,i,i,.,-.,:,:-,•:,-,,, ,..:!,,,,, ;:,,...,,,, ,,,,,,.. .....%•:...,,,s,?„,,•:,...:,...,.::,,,,,,•:„..-.; ,• .-:,-......,-- .•,-. :....:•:„...:.:-.,f,•=.,•,-,..,:;. ., -;•-_,,:_!:::,--.:.-;>:-.-•.'. :1 ,:,,--j.:..,,,.....,:-.;i,,,173; ! , ..,_1,?; .1..,0.,:i.r•g• 4),,-.;:43,:,;.4 i .4i :,.. .-.,;*:,: .*:...?".,:..f44 .'•.',,;.!;-. tt...'-fil.,;:.-::k:,4,,;;;::i.:' .'..'!;:-..,.::-„--,;,,:4:4-,':'.',..',.:-.,..::',',:"..,',--':',',' ',.: :: 'Y',....,.:',..;'.,'-::..1-;:l'-if ,: ":''..:1.-.`'',.:;.';.,-..:.i....'4','.''.,4 -`..,:'.....•;.;;;' ,:-. 1,1r3,',11 Du-;,.,1 ,,:ta;ito., -,-),:?.,:::;0..„..'4.3..,;,..-rv.y..-1•A,-'-z , .-4, .,1,,,,,,--_.y,:.: ,.,,.:- .;,,,,,,,,r,,,,,,,;.,i,:,:i.:, ,,7'-,: i.7.3Z'..'N.:.;;W, .L;-..-.,,`:,- -,-;.,,,:-:,—t ''',.,,,:::::,,,,.: ‘._i .:.'.::-,;.:.',,,:i. .4.,..„:'1 :-.,-,'..,,-;.;.:':::::..:.1:':-.-`,.-.-:':,?,--,.--.,''..-'.'2-tr',4:-:::::$:•,-;.--...'‘ r.'". . . , . , -*st.,-'•...''n'd.''.-43,-:.b4:2----',..,15.:13 ..4431-(3 -. `..,,77:'ird1.1)':.....':''''.:'.,;.:•,. '-'. .4.r.A'...;;.,'-::- . .... -:.:::,:,. : . ,-,r, .;-.,:-.,., ,,,. „.,.• ..‘.,.,.. -- .,: :,..,-:„,,,-...., ,:,,.: ',.....1 '.=-7•=,;•Tcr•-•!4-1;i',—..••••••'.1-;=-7•;':-'ia.._.-..ii-il:pi•I'••:;•:•V.:'''.:,-= ',.t‘,,,• ..•;;;',?/':•;J;.••-, 11.,• ;:,c..f.:::.••.:1::Ii-'';- '.:.•:,f;;,;••_,:!:-9,.!fl•..;•, • •:',, -::-,,, •':,=',,...,•?.'„. ;-,,,,,,,,:.E ."'.. .:•••,.',- '.....:';...;,-.:-/I'.,,,... ,,...-,‘,,'..,,....‘,...,;••:-.., .: ....-,,,..'• • 2:„•:,.,-•.t:;;,,..,,,,...,,...,,,,,,,,,•;,4,::...„.......j,... _..y,:i4,,,,-,013:0),.....5.,,,,..i:;.-. ; :... .!,..„-,?,,,er: ::.,..„:4::!R.,...,>,„iir ,.ii.,,,%....,,, ,.. ..j.-4,:z...,, ,,_-...,-,....\ .: -,.. . .....,;,,,,,,;.,!...Ti',..,,i..71,77: -.-_':::.:.:i.-;,?:3,',:f:-:;c:c . :-..!.:,' ',, ,,.-: ,:, ..!i ,, ,',',. - ,1-?:,.'!:`:.'' .,,....,.'.;:'.'.::...,,' 1:.''S , o.60-',A. 1.::'.cc,i,-,..5-5:- •-•; 'ID . ! . 5. ..,- -.':'. . .-._:!:.1k,.--i:'. ......:.:V-i...„':;!,:::!:V.'.--'..-•.,,:-.<,'Ff...;:',::':.'!"1-.vi'l:.P.,-'(4,',::?;,.,t';‘: c cf.',..-.'".;.:..-:::...4.-,.:': :':,?, ;'.-. ..3.•''- ''':•' ..-_:- .' '..-= ':::••".- V!!:.;•:';'';,[4',,Nc° :•'•••!'i-; , ,•,:••.'t•-•-...•• T,I.i:::A.',.'si ‘111-131):-.4ri0-1-24 :A-'::';','4.3 .1e4,''':.Y.=:`•:; _'•'•LI •Y•'C','•'''k'•!;•':•::: :::','-='-':,,":-''4'6=•:-.-iC'Xignrr:,.k''''-i ;";•=r;•.57f•'-,•. •'.t.•; :i=5.;.,'i'''''??.-1 f.,..-.,• ..;=.:'::....:;-•••:•••''''-';,-':=•',,,••=.„,'-: '2.,=:.;•;•-,-•;.q';,..:4=-.1"i•AJ,,.„'„-.',.",:-.•-•':-,•-,-;r:. ;.77:-••,!..;-;.",s., ..,,,='[.,-;.••-,:•••••=,,.•''.0,-,.::7 ..'- ... ...... . -1 ''.473 .•J,. 4-'...:;-,,:q.,;,,d, ,•-:::'3 3:.?;::...,;.;'1'.,'`''''... '-,,•,':11-:!::::;:t ' ..'''C'.:''"-: ''''..i :t",",'-'-1.''',-.:' -'':'.::--'".,''......: /,'''''',:-;', ..- ';',4';-:-`-&,..Al::::,Ve.',':'' ''..` :''•(;A1'....:.'- '.•-..,.':'i kr.i '.0' ,..,m'. -',.' '' '-,.;.-1':,'''''.i . ''..'''';':' ,'''::` .-- ''3'10 ' .1-'6)•••7.:-,.."...il))l';'-1D,-:.',:l:iti'. ii 4,17)tV., :1, ...:'7".' '''. -:-.,..,-'`-':.-::,..:,'`:.i..,,-.,,'" '.. ,-.---.-;;;4:-..,,,,-',. .,-..,f,L,tD„•-•:.;:,..:1::,"i::- ..t..f;,..'..;;t:; ',.,i.;.'_1,',=!!:.:.:."5:y.f: i'i._.:;;-,...`,::!, ,-,;,••-.2 .. , : . .. ,?:--„! ,2-, :::,;...V...: jg„,,,t5)::. ,.,,y ,' ..„;.: r!:5':111").-:;;i1-.. .-:1-.,M,41 tli.'''74';'4'.,':'''.';',,-Z'I-1'.'':.:-:',,:::: ':::1,'q;::'':`..1:!"';:''''':'''',..":. :-.'„'.1.::::::''.;:;: '''''.g:'''j"!,-:. :..--;'•ti,'''.-';''';:i''',;:,-;.,,It'''..7::);,'!(..:;;. '":,-'il'":-V 1 ''''';',:C.'i'?'14,'./ ''.''''..i.''.: :.-: ...f9 .'; :s.%ti : " 2,1.1''..:141)-!..4912:7Air.,3::,a.::virA:.--iii'?:,c';:11,-4';'.1 .:•:',-:=?,,,ti'.2',.';-,`:-: . ,. .:i ..„-, . •-•,;,..,-;:.,,•;- ..-....[;:- .0 1 i•.., ,e0,,.,.i',-,j.)..;,•,:: :-:•:,;:',;::,..:,,:,..,,!:...-.:::,,, m;•:•::..--,;:,::-,2 ,•:.;.:.:•.:;•.-],- . ....-,':..,,',..,)•.,..,,,,.-----;:.•-;',.::...:',:,..,::-..;-,';„-,,,,::-..',,,,.A..:4;•.'ii,;;;;,:::-$,.1:!;,?'-ix...,;:,:ii!. .:1..;r,rnvf.,..i..:•-,-.1.• :,::...-;-‘1.,...---i:.=:•;,;-0.ft.,' .-'?.. --'40 ,-:.,..: .,.,A,'.•••••-ii'f....i:',.:,.:;;:,,, ,•.•$;,,,i'-;-: ,..,.....,,i,,,:,1 ':-:,,y, , ,..i.,--,,,!,.,-..,::::,-,2 ,.1::,::.:,70.-i5i.::-.,-,-,::.,..,-....-„, .c,:-,51:::::.... ,,,;,x,..;;,, ,,,:.::-...f:;--,,,:::-....,i,„-...,:ylifil,:,:i4.1, :,:,....-if.,•::,5::,.„,vi.f...::„.:.:,,,,:.J.,,,,,,:::,,,,;.,!,_,,...,,.„ ...40,..„;,0.......11.••:,,,-..,:,.;• , •=.,:- .,., ,, —=:',>4 ,a) ,41) '.C1 ',to....,„-,-..41,.--to,i, '.`,YW:$4 :"..",' ' ...:,."; - :. ''.i'°'. -ta `.;'..r =...•;••,...••.= -..-.-: '::•.:= ,---,••,•',....•••,===1;••••,' i'...l.,---•••.:,',.......c: L'2,:1211,;=,•••,1,-e••••7--;:'"i;•.•:•-:::. :"...?-..'" ...:..A, .., ''' •...';',..'-r'':.''':fj:-' $-C.4.) F.0 2:-i'''''', .,.'' '', ..,.....,---4.3 ,....,....0 rx : „„;:s....... .. 0.•,-4 , ,,.,-_.i,„_H,,,,,,,-, : ...,,,•:,ed :....;,-,;?:: ,,,,:, ........„...d.gp. i-. ,... .., i'..,.., :-, •,-..,,-,;,.„, -..,,,,-...,,:,7•,,,,--;',,,:i",,,.„..,,-....7.-n'',..%',...:.,,. ii,:: -.;-..:;:'-:7,''';-:'''.;.\ , ,--\:.'. •.-,' . ;- -'-:?-1-1'::.'3ii;'-,','L-''',1. ',.,'L,= .-.e.--;-.1.,.',....i-..4; -.:- .',.'.*:.0.:-,-•L..1..,,zi 0.5.1_,0.14_vd)''o;:Lo.--1 1 4-1,pi..-.... ,21%-,a.71,•:-='-:;..-.° ...;.:,,4.-:','',','.f.'.'7,,i ..-.7-.[..-:.',.:-[....,..-.--;;:.:'.::::0;•-...,,-;:',;`,,•4;:.:„.-„-..;', ..,-: -... :.i'V.'-'1.,:. ,,-,' .--, ,.-., . ' -,:,.,.:-. ,•,.,.:. -,,-,,,,,..: .:• .1::..:•.,.;,,,,::0 i-.:',.;-;';', ;;:i.7-,:,''• ,- '....:0:i,, ".:, ,.1-:',.•,•-''c:....-',,z,.r.,,., 7," 'fr.' .1.1, :>I la.11 .41),./.4,X.. .,., .,.,1 el... . 1.,,,,,>I,,'?.,i,:.,,,.,.. ''i..,;,:' , ,..,'; '.2 i.; r.'":':''S::..:A l''.!:1-'''... : ,... '': ., a f,'„',:;;::i iL..',';:,I,r,,f6-:ci• ..,-..7„siit:•,•,-..4 .,•-,11, •:.: 0.,ci.761,-13,,-A•,'AS..:0 ,):A-• .:'„W. .-SI:---.„"7,7,7 , • :..' -'•;c:.,•:-A-,.„-i:cf a•,,,-,f1.,.-,,..i ,ii.•, ',1-...:..„ ',:,-,-r.y.,,..:•',-1...-::::..:.;:•,c,frti' •.;:,,f•i::.'A,,,',. '47.,..A• ,t`k14, , ,•--,•• •,r-i.,,,,-;•-••••-t ••: •••'.-,.- -,, ••••,.o---2,,i•••-,,=2,-,,-;,,N.,r4r,.'..,2;•;'-',":-Al"';,;`,'.',..P41,;',.;.,-,Vi...":.•',..y,,,:r.. ..,ft-i-.1'.1•'•%''',.','r"'.= -", ' ' ' .„ •,...,•.,••:•:, ::- :.-...":z,7L.,:-,-, ..,.:,,-,. '.: •,.-,'1::,., ;'.1 •:.',.•;...,;„,.., ',,:. ., ''A 1,,!.:.:.;::is ,., :•:.':(1):,:::,:t:;f3 ,0 .:10,E-I r!, ••• ,,.,.-.: i.;;.;•:..,7,:'.'..-".. . ,..1:".-: '.'?4:-.'":-:',„,. ,!-;4,:''?:.,'::' ' 4:-Td‹;:,V35,,?"".;';',.g';.ii';' ,Vt-.1)-gre::-,,Y-1.1 .,':''',111',.*4'Ye.q.;.','.f; V.V.":2..,...'.'''.--:'.;.14 :1:4;14-ij::,., :..,i;,.., ::;--,•'.....:,- -•••,'-:-!-•.:-,,'•.‘2,-„•:..,.;.,••••..,,,.. ..:-,,,• . .,,:.,;•,..-,:.:••••,-,-,....,,•--,..---,,,,,-;:,--:.,:-..,..;-,,,,-,:q:;,,,,,±,,••,,:-•,:-:4p4-...,,,F..,...,,,:-.,0,,,,,-...,T,,,...-f...,,,,,,,,,,...,;.,..,,,,,,...,-,...-... -,,,, - „ :"- ':.:-.' • --. -.-,-- - rr.:7_.....'-,-;-_ , .':' .'' " ''' t'-'•t'-'' ' .'.' '' \ti..s..„.,-2,.1 yr."-.1:',".."r".;-',..:' ' ''.'..,-- ,".'..'''.. ',.!:.=:• .:', --:•-7,"..'- -,,-•'-‘.',''''3.' ;',.'.''''-,- ''ir-:,'' ';''..- ,c.-,L,i4,14.-1,'".";., ...;,.', ,.-„:,,,. :' t,',i,),.4:-'..-.7:1,.. ,<Z'''.';1;....*,;.'.'0-1.!`;''''',.:,'' • ''' • i),''''--.3d. ''., c-'•,,,",,,,t.,'•".=,-]z„..„._L':,;,::;_,'',--;j.',-T,:,=" :::- ':;.,-;. ;;'1i... ' ' 4.2'1'.'-1''"?:,- ',- :-..:.'; ';! 1;1'":1.k1;;;‘!1".: -.:tZ:K1':1,:. •-:''.Z .';:-:','-;' ,.' -.'.rj1 .•'•-.ti''''.'!",,,..:-:'''.!,,:-.' ,.--.7.-,,,,.,... „..,-, . ,.,, _,..,..,.:., ,..,.., i.„.,..,,,.,,,:r .t ,,,,,,,,,,,.,, ,;.,,,,‘,,r,_ . . '':'•'•;;'!:-,..,"'-?,',':,;2:.;-',145:;•?:. : !.4•;:'17'..::‘,,,I.c.:.P.(.7,,: ;.'IR.';',1/,''I''';'.i."•P:':t.''.:Vt;'•'-V,'i'-:,,''..;',V-r,:','_'.„-! .,.., '..f.'.'.-...-!,•''''cf,,..:1,:i ::: .7.4';:i..': ';;Z::;',..... l'c.15-,„ -1:1-,.":.-_-•Pi,M,' ,-,,,,4'IA''.'.e.'.7t,',. ..''..',je4.',S,',,,....-:.2.''.'''-'•,' .: - . i'V';',-;!,:i'4-.'..3c.,'-',.7,77:7,-,-;,-;.•,,:=-.....-;;.-.;=. ••, . • 1 \` . N/ . • .. 1A. -0- • • • . . - , r.:.sr ,. .i ____. i . . 1 vi`• iz.E5rp.tisi/ .. i i 1 • i _ . . wisiu., . . ..--. .. , , . , . .. . . _ . 1 , • I 1 J f, ,* . :V If 1111111INIMITIMIIIIII.11 . :. ........) :. . • - I. • 1 ''L., . . s: W • . . , - . _ i i P7A . - illik 4atina■er-r. / . 7-i10. — s • . 7----. . . . ( -,. Architects . ..‘: 4111 5-Nerr4s\ric.. .•.% rill Vantom . . AJA , RC: .'•i, • • 1441 . -34 N.W.First St.Suite 309 . • -'. Portiond,Oregoo 97209 . . .. . • 503/226-090 . . . • , . 1 ,4( '-rl r•ii/i : * a4460 .9Z-fid.r.frci 14(461 1A-ALI . . . . . • . . ..... - .. 0 .............i, . -.. • . , . . • -----: • ...----;-. ' • 414 , . ---\- ' • . . : . • ' — -"\ ' ' 2-El -Nii&5-, . - .: - • . _ -•-\ , . • . . . . . . - • • -\ .. . . -• • -• • • , . . ,-- . .. i . . . - .1: • , // . . .. • . ______—____. . • 1 • I . _.___ . . - 1 . , . ....-- ,(1-- • . /\ / _.-- • • - _.--- • \ ....--- . . • cv ...-- .,--_,..... _ -- • - . - - • • . .. . . . • . . . . . . . , . . - . .. , . . ' .. . . 1 - 19/s.ci (1 ki A .fiNC-t-• . . 1 ro-rikl...- ........... .... • 1 , ; , .1 1. i . :,• ( .1 • ; I 'i 1 1 I I ‘ i . , I . 1 t - 1 } I .• tll on wamm....0. •••••=1 a . f • . I . . . A JOEL E. HAGGARD y ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-AT-LAW '�'•• . SUITE 2426,FINANCIAL CENTER 1215 FOURTH AVENUE • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98161 (206)682-5635 OUR FILE NO: R-19025 September 11, 1987 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Donald Erickson c/o City of Renton Re: Park Place/ECF-049-87 Dear Don: We have been asked by Mr. Shane to review the SEPA process Renton is using. We have concentrated on the reconsideration. We agree that the reconsideration was .appropriate. The record basis for the earlier determination appeared inadequate. We also had concerns under RCW 87.02.020. We recognize that you wish us to identify how we interface with a variety of other projects. None of the other projects are part of our proposal. Thus we do not understand your requiring us to conduct studies which are beyond the scope of our proposal or have arisen subsequent to our application. Without waiver of any right or claims, TPE has provided a supplemental traffic review dated September 11, 1987 . We would perhaps quibble with your assertion that the failing to provide quick response is punatively res- ponded to by requiring an EIS. Indeed we note (subject to further review) that applicant's rights, prior City. actions and the September 11, 1987 TPE report all provide an ade- quate and reasonable basis for an MDNS with reasonable conditions. Sincerely yours, 9 J�Oel Haggard Erick iag 9 14 JEH/dm 0114d ✓cc: Mr. Dan Shane £h,closu.re — TIE g,eebAT • °% ` • CITY OF RENTON iriLL POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor September 3, 1987 Dan Shane Ra Mac, Inc. P.O. Box 653 Renton, WA 98054 RE: Park Place Environmental Reconsideration, ECF-049-87 Dear Mr. Shane: The Environmental Review Committee reconsidered their earlier Determination of Non-significance - Mitigated, issued originally on August 20, 1987. After a careful review, the Committee felt that it had no other choice but to r.nalss_its earlier decision because it felt there was insufficient information to make a determination of non-significance at this time. Because of major concerns about traffic ' ingress and egress to the site as well as regional traffic impacts from major proposed new developments in the immediate area, the Committee stated that it Ae needed an updated traffic study from you. This study should show 54 how your project will interface with the ERADCO rezone proposal (R-008-87) , the Centron rezone proposal (R-073-87) , Monterey c Terrace, and the City's proposed Community Recreation Center, la 01111 across Maple Valley Highway. Since both the State Environmental Policy Act and Renton's Environmental Ordinance require a quick determination, the Committee decided that it would need a response from you no later than September 11, 1987, giving the Committee the authority to delay making a final decision . and identifying who your traffic consultant will be (you may wish to run a few names by Gary Norris, the City's Traffic Engineer for concurrence on their acceptability, as well as the specifics the City is looking for in such a study) . If the Committee has no response from you by Septe er 114 2, it has asked me to inform you that it would have no al ernative but to issue a Determination of Significance which wo ld trigger the preparation of an environmental impact statement or the changing of the proposal so that there were no proba le significant environmental impacts (WAC 197-11-360) . 644 P!F N 7....5"J'E.,r.a ` J 'APE 4ef or1 //n fg '1M 11K:11 A.,n.a.0 Cnn*1, - Aonfnn Wochinafnn /MSS - Ofl\71S-7557 Dan Shane Park Place Environmental Reconsideration, ECF-049-87 September 3, 1987 Page 2 The Committee did agree with you that it probably did not have sufficient information to substantiate the estimated traffic mitigation fee of $188 per vehicle trip. Hopefully, with this new traffic information, a more realistic figure can be developed. — ( SL rtreSt If I can be of any assistance to you, please feel free to contact me. On behalf of the Env' mental R ommitt Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE: RaMac, Inc. -' September 2, 1987 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Jerry Lind Land Use Inspector City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Parking allotments Park Place Dear Jerry: This letter will verify my conversation with you some time ago that the total number of rentable rooms for the Silver • Cloud Motel has been reduced from 115 rooms to 104 rooms. The parking spaces provided for the three areas in the Park Place development are as follows: 1 . Silver Cloud: 104 spaces for units 6 spaces for 9 employees TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 110 2. Shari ' s: 3900 square feet 39 required spaces TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 41 3. Office Building: 40, 000+ gross square feet 38, 400 net rentable space TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 192 This should provide the information you requested. Very truly yours, RAMAC, INCORPORATED Dan Shane President DS: hgk RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392.4199 qz&A) r. \114r eir,‘ of dsAiThiq 3 p B-z�-157 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT A strip of land approximately 15 feet wide lying within the northeast quarter of Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: • Commencing at a monument at Station 1537 + 63.44 on State Highway No. 5 "Maple Valley Highway." Thence N 40° 23' 10" W 887.30 feet; Thence N 52° 01' 42" E 93.17 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: Thence continue N 52° 01' 42" E 160.00 feet; Thence N 37° 58' 18" W 15.00 feet; Thence S 52° 01' 42" W 145.68 feet; Thence N 40° 47' 35" W 206.03 feet to the southeasterly right-of-way of the "H-Line" on ramp of Primary State Highway No. 1, also known as Interstate Highway No. 405; Thence S 49° 54' 38" W 15.00 feet; Thence S 40° 47' 35" E 217.05 feet; Thence S 39° 58' 37" E 3.44 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. RaMac, Inc. August 26, 1987 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 M i l l Avenue South Renton,Washington 98055 • RE: RaMac, Inc. (Park Place) Site Approval ( ECF-049-87,SA-054-87) Dear Committee Members: • 0 . We received a letter dated,August 17, 1987, from Mr. Donald Erickson,Zoning Administrator for the City. Among other comments made in the letter was a statement that the Environmental Review Committee had decided that in order to mitigate "anticipated future traffic impacts" I would be required to pay a traffic mitigation fee of $188 per trip for the 2330 project generated trips. This condition was apparently included in an initial MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE which'had an effective date of August 20, 1987. The MDNS indicates that Renton will not act on the proposal until fifteen days from August 20th in order to allow any interested parties to submit written comments. We infer that this means any comments received within fifteen days would be considered prior to the final mitigated MDNS. We request your reconsideration'particularly on Condition No. 10 in the MDNS. Until such time as you have acted upon the reconsideration, we assume that the 14-day appeal period mentioned in . your August 20th notice would not start to run. Please confirm this so that we are not required to file a premature appeal. We are interested in reviewing with you all the information on file, any questions you have and any other concerns in order to assure that appropriate conditions are. required by the City. The appropriateness of the conditions obviously depends upon the facts, the ' • . studies,other information you have available, as well as other legal matters. We believe that a - reconsideration and discussion between us and all interested parties may help to appropriately ' resolve our concerns so that the right job is done. Please respond as soon as possible with respect to this request for reconsideration because of the pending deadlines for a possible,appeal.We look forward to meeting with you and any appropriate parties at the earliest convenience. 5 • Very truly yours, RA7C RATED • an Shane . ' • President S • DS:hgk cc: Ronald Nelson S Richard Houghton Larry Springer • • . 0 Larry Warren,Esq. • . Joel Haggard, Attorney at Law RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 653, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392.4199 • t% CITY OF RENTON "LL • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director August 17, 1987 Dan Shane 20919 SE 34th Issaquah, Wa 98027 RE: RaMac Inc. (Park Place) Site Approval (Files ECF-049-87, SA- 054-87) Dear Mr. Shane: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of your conditional use request for property located on the north side of Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405 . The Committee on August 12, 1987 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the. site. 2 . That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. 3 . That hotel units facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to have interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 4. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon- a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 r/4 Dan'Shane August 17, 1987 Page 2 5. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 on-ramp traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6,300. 00 for the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the ramp. 6. That the applicant provide a detailed traffic impact analysis to the satisfaction of the City's Traffic Engineer to identify additional traffic mitigation measures. 7. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant) from upland properties, the applicant shall clL provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing canopy trees around the parking Seth areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building 1-14 '':5 and Zoning Department. 8. That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. Eue 44.4 (P*4 PI19 9. That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 10. In order to mitigate anticipated future traffic impacts from this project, the owners of the site shall be required to provide a traffic mitigation fee of $188 per trip for the 2330 project generated trips by means ,of a bond or other means acceptable to the city or agree, by means of a covenant, to participate in a future LID for traffic related improvements identified in a future regional traffic impact mitigation study. Note: The applicant will be credited for participation in the traffic impact mitigation study, as well as for any off-site traffic improvements identified from this study or provided for in advance of the study recommendations. Excess fees will be returned to the applicant or owners of the site. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue _ a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the, Committee's decision. The comment period will end September 3, 1987. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. Appeals are made to the City's Hearing Examiner. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to ^ Dan`Shane August 17, 1987 Page 3 establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2540 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. ' For the Env' ment 1 iew Committee, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG:ERCDETLR 41 41to., CITY OF RENTON i ai... y�Q "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 17, 1987 RaMac, Inc. P.O. Box 653 Renton, WA 98057 RE: RaMac Inc. (Park Place) Site Approval (Files ECF-049-87, SA- 054-87) Dear Sirs: Building and Zoning Department has received the additional information requested and formally accepted it for the above referenced project. Your application has been routed and tentatively scheduled for the Environmental Review Committee on August 24, 1987, to consider your environmental checklist. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact Betty Grimshaw of this office at 235- 2540. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:BG • Mill Avenue Smith - Rentnn Wachinotnn QR(KS - (1(161 ric-15d11 R Mec, Inc. July 14, 1987 Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP . Zoning Administrator Building & Zoning Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: RaMac, Inc. (Park Place) Site Approval ( Files ECF-049-87,. SA-054-87) Dear Mr. Erickson: In response to your letter under date of July 1 , 1987, we have subsequently submitted to Dee yesterday, July 13, 1987, modified prints for the above referenced subject to include the following: 1 . Seven (7) copies of the corrected Site Plan. 2. Seven (7) copies of the complete drawings for the proposed restaurant. 3. Seven (7) copies of the drawings for the proposed hotel . We appreciate your expeditious approach to this Site Approval and look forward to hearing from you. . . Very truly yours, • RAMAC, INCORPORATED Dan Shane President DS: hgk , �Q '/II 7 (h o0i Er/cAr&O RaMac, Inc. • P.O. Box 853, Renton, Washington 98057 • (206) 392-4199 %0 ' CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 1, 1987 RaMac, Inc. P.O. Box 653 Renton, WA 98057 RE: RaMac Inc. (Park Place) Site Approval (Files ECF-049-87, SA-054-87) Dear Sirs: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your environmental checklist and site approval application for the above referenced project. . Your application is being held, pending receipt of the following information: 1. As discussed, we require a vicinity map that clearly shows the surrounding land use for a radius of at least E?chairi-O 400 ft. at a* scale of 1' :200" . 2. A complete landscape plan . must be submitted that includes information on the number and size of species, at the time of planting, spacing instructions, etc. Landscaping and surface treatment of pedestrian linkages needs to be coordinated with traffic circulation. 44(-.c(A aK v{, ;�� • d rcuis ceic.Oar, y`s. fir 7/4/87 /QAMHc 'fa Erickson 3 . more information is required on the types of materials that will be used and how the various buildings on the site will be tied together with a common architectural theme. The development standards for the site should identify a palette of' materials and suggest that all new buildings will use a minimum percentage of these. Typical materials should be shown on the building elevations. hicluded )n re vi.cd p le,ks. .tt (-Iv '/ '/ 7 -b Fr;c kson - D..«F..« all....1.:«..F.« AOACC - 1'1fCt 01^1C_7CAA Dan Shane July 1, 1987 Page 2 4. Pedestrian linkages on the site between buildings need to be better thought out. Also, it would be desirable if there was a pedestrian activated traffic signal allowing access from the site to the Cedar River Park. There should also be pedestrian linkages to allow future access through the site from the neighborhoods to the north to Cedar River Park. Sce: 141, 7447 5. A drainage plan that clearly explains treatment for surface water runoff is required. Where will runoff from the underground CMP retention collectors go and how will runoff from the sloped parking that collects in retention ponds be treated? Existing and proposed contour elevations on the site should be shown. P(.a At* a rttiirere� — axe W�� Prat,64%, 6. Complete drawings for the proposed restaurant need to be submitted if this element is to be considered as a part of this application. i - j4em a If you have any questions regarding this project or this letter, please contact myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague of this office at 235-2540. Sinc:re ,/ Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:BG VI I . '` � mo' ..7.) /C7 111, , ,Iv /VII • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO'(S) . : SA-054-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3 ,900 sq. ft. resturant and 40, 000 sq. ft. office building on a 5. 696 acre site. PROPONENT: RaMac,Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. , November 9, 1987, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 DATE OF DECISION: October 21, 1987 ` EFFECTIVE DATE: October 26,1987 /4/ '0nald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer :uilding and Zoning Director Policy Development Director (444/a-6 .446/p0e/ 4, • Ri rd C. Houghton Pub is Works Director /4- \ L 17?"1"4?),/ DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: RaMac, Park Place ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-049-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-055-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval for the development of a 115 room hotel, a 3,900 sq. ft. restaurant and a 40, 000 sq. ft. office building. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1800 Maple Valley Highway, immediately east of I-405. CONDITIONS• 1. That the applicant, in order to mitigate I-405 on-ramp traffic impacts, is requested to provide a mitigation fee of $6, 300. 00 for the restructuring of the existing traffic signal at SR-169 and the ramp. 2 . That the applicant shall be responsible for designing a new traffic signal and having it installed at the existing entrance' to Park Place. It will be the applicant's responsibility to see that the new traffic signal is coordinated with the on-ramp traffic signal to I-405. The signal design shall meet the City of Renton' s existing equipment. 3 . That the applicant provide a crosswalk across the Maple Valley highway at the traffic signal. 4 . That the applicant be responsible for the off-site improvements on the north side of Maple Valley Highway along the project site frontage on Maple Valley Highway. 5. That because of potential traffic impacts at the intersection of N.E. 3rd and Bronson, only emergency access shall be allowed from N.E. 3rd Street and Bronson Way N.E. to the site. 6. That the applicant provide for on-site retention sufficient to hold a minimum 25 year of 24 hour storm with a release rate based upon a 5 year storm. In addition, the applicant is to provide readily accessible oil/water separators for treating storm water before its eventual discharge into the Cedar River. 7. That hotel it facing I-405 on-ramp be treated in such a manner so as to raTe interior noise levels of 40 dbs or less using insulated glass and exterior wall treatment. 8. That a vehicular separated pedestrian linkage be provided between Maple Valley Highway and the residential uses to the north. Note to applicant: Alternatives include enhancing the existing pedestrian pathway along the western edge of the site or possibly providing a new pathway on the eastern edge of the site in the greenbelt area. The applicant shall work with the Parks and Recreation Department and the Building and Zoning Department staff. 9 . That a system of clearly delineated pedestrian routes be established connecting all proposed buildings on the site. 4t11.94 ? Determination of Non- 4gnificance ti %} ' Mitigation Measures RaMac, Park Place Page 2 10. To reduce glare and other visual impacts due to this project (hotel/restaurant), from upland properties, the applicant shall provide screening devices for mechanical and lighting equipment as well as placing canopy trees around the parking areas. These measures should be worked out with the Building and Zoning Department. 11. That because of the high visibility and visual impact of the site, greater mitigation of negative aesthetic impacts with more extensive landscaping and stronger thematic continuity is required. .....„., , - . . -- --:.8_.'t.. •.50-. ,.„,....,,,,,,,,,A.,:.,:,1-1,„,,„, '----, -------_,„ --- f A 0 / A-,,,t ...„.. / \ ' .4%' „....,/ / -1 A ,. ,...6 4-k_./.,,_,4. -,,,,,- - / •,, -/ ,-1,, ..il, it '1; '\.<-' '7'14.,. • . I; A', • ! 1 z 7.,,,, .11 ,a• i t . • ,,,,:- vi't 14. ,,N,,./ .,;,‘..,,,, -r\ \ If. -:. , , •. 1,19.11 ttge g'' , • t t t n't..t g, ,,'..?, . ,--c-,„'„, , , iL.,,: - ., .=.,, -y i • / ,k,,, c•ii- ) :. ,,..;/ .,, „lc: ,,,,,,, . rk 1. ''. 1 '4‘.,1- '''', '.f.'"%""i'sc,ii''.1 , • '', • , \ 1 ,'"51.r;,•" •! '..,:;:v. ,i'l• \.• \ ," -' „ ,,*>-•.i, -l'it% —1..'‘.: „t ' c/Th'N ./ -/,'1*-?•:-- .' ',/,Ki,- I" `--4 ;if .11 j „,. „,0 ./ ../..,V,,,6 :\"'„,-- I -14 .1 - Z '1'• 1.,` • - \ ,•,,,,,, . 0 ,it 7 0/ ,„?, A.-7 ,-- - • , ,,,/, , A, ..i i---<-:- 14 . 4 ,,,-4'°- / -V--,' s'a c: -:,„),X \:// .• -."<, P ' '' ,...t ,/ .--,..2.-;/- \a‘,,,5'.• ".,J. ,, '".. k„ \,....> • , , t a - ‘0\r /' 4:"J(''', '••1;/:'•, :1‘''' ,/ ./.'2: . V \ •1•••X • ),,, Y,' ,, Ik!,;ii: /• /,./.'"•••:4 A''• \`.s:•‘•,''''..V„?‘ 14 / ?'• f‘1';.* ••., •1Z ‘.‘„;',Y' ‘. -t,' '4," ..-- ''';el" \ ''.!,,,,/.- y/i.,,20'''' •''-6N\ '" ..,,, , •-7/,";:./ 'A\ ,../-;'' 444,-„. ..- „...,,, ,7, , jg .'...' ' W(...// ---`,,,/ ' Si.,,/,,O,*'•"/; •;e4..1-"" ‘‘' / •" l'•••••'•'. \,' %•.• /.01/:1, 0'. \•,, ' kty e.', ••' *\ •'".,,•.1"(,,N• ' ''' •<' -',/"< ''..",' ''.'. r v* ,,r,,,,, ,..•, ' :',/. • ve..,74, •••-•,$:: \------„ z.,, " i!2-,t, fps,1 ,.,.:,:•.<ei,>.', ••%:.',,, , ,1 3. ii.',- ii x,": ‘ ' -, igi, .4k,/ ,,,;,•,--., in \ ,,,,,. , ''''':\t, ,,,c,•,,,,, \ 7,,i, , '/V*,,;,,'s\ ",2:\ . „.6\ X Q'',^1.• OM \• \•••••V\ \ '''' ' tr'''' '•• ' •1/ •z'\'` ' ''''s '' \\ •-' s V.,/• ••"•' 4'/...,>\'''' - \\ '\\ \"\\ N''7:1-‘,\'`',.2C,.,5.,:,> , ,„ a" , • , •, ,,) ',..it .:.'r , j r \ ''' \ A Si''A .•,1 •'1( / ---.7-A','-,'' \v,. ,-",X`'k,„, 1!) \\ • \\., \' ' `,--: 4,, ,',..,'''',"•,/' ",- \ ,„/,t>. , - •i \ \ `•-\ \,,;1, '-,,-'i(' ,)A a A :„N, A.. `,,7,• \ ' A' •s -i• • \\ 1 '''.4"1 "I'‘,:s-tv 1....„.. '.., ,-.., •' \‘'Y 191•/ I . \ 11 ..1'\''' IA,\•;.‘'.,-% \,/.011' `.. g • \ k,,, \.1 '''•',.',.:<1/•,‘.;.4': , ' ', `',A, 7. .,\ .• \\a\ - , \ \ s: ,, ‘Z,-,.—', • v•• ‘;,,ct.,,-,)! ..,, .?„ 6 r ... t, \ \ •.•''.t. ‘. •,';'" ' 1•.\ .. ,• '.,,s•/,)' •\ \' ' \‘`• ,%.+ "... '.*X.`"fr . ,V,}-1;g1",:. itil \ \ * \\\• •'•1,.../ ‘1'•'' ,•V••?/.//1/1.' V'SO.''''i,•ilif•"5.<k" 1;t,..t'4, i„..:,7',..' - \ ' 1;', \‘ ', \ ''. •••• ' "\\•,•. %"1.•.i1 4,1',. 'AA„ " A- t,i--;?-;;I;'' \ .:,.<,, i..,,,,\ v.s., -,---', ', Z,,,\-7,4.-,`,, ! •t.,,,, 1';t.' .3•:,.f 1 v.t'u': ., „,,,,, ., ,,:,...'.„. :..•,>,, • ,;• ''' ''i'",P1'• 1 i'11 1 \ 1.-.. \\ \\s:‘ *.„, '‘, --);','; : \ ••••;,. ,,,,,,\„,„, •,,,,:,',‘,...:,,,., ›,',,,,,,;;;,,, -,i, y,F,J ..r• t§ 11 6 P.•0)••' \ <5, '. •,\ s • \ ,`,/ t/t: -i'' , :,, - '-' • 1-,-f,, 't !z !:''V .F A \ N\ - N'•.,, '; ', ',,:, :,`Y, R. • \ \X i i.,,..' 0,-, ir \ , \.\\ IL\. , \,,,, ,. , ) ., N• \ ..4, ''. .. / ' 41.44e. / \.k. / / ..,,„. / Z. - - -- - ... . ... - - 4. ... ,.... ... - .., -.4, -.- ....4 -. 44-4. ..4 ... .44 4.., ..,.. ....4 .... 4... . ... .., ... Shoot No. 1 • III\ CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Onto:-1,-•%,:,„1-7,' Revised:. FT-77)n 5:-7-* :•.c?A!.--; . , . _ ... OAR %HARE PROPERTY WARREN LAFON MAPLE vALLEY HIGHWAY Cbeekocb ARCH I TECT RENTON,WASHINGTON of . Job No.: 0 'Ora,Sd s3mOossv aav N08mav 1 1Or el pp 1113IUA400 'ON 13315- -{yZ IL T 3 . --,,,...,, - • (J1 I 1-111- 61+1-LOL- Him FP pnl A4Mhc�H O.L�_,ItlI -zd rv.x 6 iyY lIs -Mind'd'6 Gm'62 -• 03MTrIY d9 6ZI'GS • Z 1 Q a47TAN�d_ c5 (Z74•Sy'*ay - Ie• b •--‘ V. \ - ,06 a I6 I9 81 ILI I Z ,. na]B-Z N2d7 77OuI4R1 151.4 � _J(n, ti.7INIVIZa JNLLShG l. r• 11, 1 I ' ___ \�00e01 (VH- �I6.r9 -Z4V 9NICrT1G ?IOrNTnd I � R \ F , SID,1110J I 6 �i X-.41O1 011 O3OIlOJJ 9YR1WA Loi Telex." Is6 a1G 01 6' OL/GHI �` \\,1 ) • -J. • a_ Z 6731.01dW2 e, c' Nu I \11Nn1I a -b01 G1Jn - NOIA' W71...B DCIQUir3-a 9NIWA \ 2 Vabim W7LS Odtd4M OaVTVNIW6 411-I. 3d1J_NOLY1V12JW ��� 6 -Q1d3a OGZ .T'Ol 1lwanxo I IZO1 / ,IL / I I ..r _LJ•GC Syd% TnOL 1 Ld'OC O15'GI 4RTJ /� \� — - ldGS=fl6'1I 4Wla a Io1 • rI�bl ��� li'd6 OZOL 4C01d _L6I ."— 17d1J .'7,r1Sa _ \\ • I p'* 3(2r -- / '743HJ-\: Te ne bL ` �Ay I } I r g El . 1N3W.SV3 �� I Z -- _ r d� 111l1I `t7�w 11 z i-- NN\4O10W I IN \ - 3 I • A�aWi \ I \ 1 I _ Q :,. _ --------- I I e • 1}III ,,, O II I $ \u I \ a_ 4y'ilVly LU6 6I \ Cr °z C I \ I \ I ��� � 1.k! I __ _'I f5-- _-1___ �__-_ —f11 ._._.-\_ _ -- /t bq_"-.,�-b1_ tij L I\ n'lZ 1 I I I� Ibt I8 I li�I I v .� 4. \'I II�'�l5 �. Z m i I ikat-& Of i \ _- I 11 K 111 II • ,�IIIp • 1. 4.11,CT..-1 O1Lq L \ j 81-- H t \\ \,\\1\I:\ 1 7II �` I 1 gam ; "� \ s \ 1 \� I N • (\�f/ ma m 1 p - I( 43LWhn0 \ \\\\ \Ij ,, a A.r ZZ.'�I V -- --- - - 1,I g rl G \ ` 111'( 1 �I a ._...N it"�s j� y \ • O!el , i17L `� co, ' - _ dvLJ 1.LINIW\ I \ i�9 --11`-- �,1�t}f1-o Y211,®H revs m- --i-- �C- '�4anN useFj • �/�/��U ti I. i.'it MI �`'o-..s�ta�.... +�oe \ ti� VJ �,x XW A41.W ,\� • 1 0 YaJ� C7 0 a . p / —t 1 - 31ve MSS' 112W 3fl*3ndO Cd . I SS3NSOlad . . • . • • ' . . . . . • E,,I F, m , 5 g 1 , . a , S i 1 _. .. g - .11 . F • • • . . . .. - • - . • •• _ . _ --- -ferk•IN•NNTIVC.• cjILD SPAss -- ----f- Ilk *-li IN-41801`1P : _A.` . -dffik 411151 At .41ZAPV*IIAAAA ,• 4. , , 6 ., _ ...,, _. _. .. _ .. .VP t..--21..„, .411N...4" • y , [11 ' I -i 7 J, -1 8 Vs _C ; -1 ra ,_, q 1 - I f. 4 9 400pp ? , _,. 2 . • / . . . N\ - to ar, g • , 1 I ..(''t• .• ' .. \ •1••• t - ,1 / / / //:/// , .•i,\„/ / /9'///././,/ ,/' I-,l'' • 1— /// //;,//7 '''27/11. leg P PI e,„ . ,y, 77, /.</:/:/// „., io , , / ,,,,.,:./,///,„ ,,, . ,, .) . / ,././ ., .., , 1 ,,,„. , 5 ' k : . • ...../ / ///:///,/ ,bw, / /...d.<41, 01 2 te " ). ' '-'-'46 .fr. 'L....?•"" 'I I. .., •L.A. ,, I o .6 1- . ___________ __ - , t - p E S 0 / ''.CP r; • ,a- li, x i•r.0 _ 5 '411, , 1 tr///// 19 ; r•-\I g ' .,C vilijo 0 .4 g 6 4 • , . 1': / -' 0 ,,, z /4 , t ,1 1140 §g 00-4011 g 2 2' VitEi Ito. 71 ,?, -sw!kftfiealrjelAVII, Amu AIL ritaisTroixx...,rez--vric. .Lnhome:11 IL .1,11, 11A.1 a, , ' • +,4,••,/,,,,:i 1.';:;',,,1., T -r, E k . 9 l'i • .) 1',:,,c_,, ; . , i'. I ft ;;;,-,•i C . ,-, tA, t • ' : 'a •_.•• , , . . 0 6 L 0 -. 0 . , .,4 g LANVX-.Mt-• F1-41,N . ,D11.--VET-CL.01-11D INN- heNTON DATE ,5.ts_r JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS, INC. 7' JIM lAtYMOLITH-CI,INCP.• A IA C E. 11 7ECT' S . • --n . i0820 Ni.8th • Ulan Wishingtsn B8004 • (MI 451-3098 co w o m y 1 m A w m • . 1 1 g 1 I I I I i I — , — 1 I \ 1 I 1 I 1 — . H M I—__ 1—__ ,-- IN ! , ; 1/ i1 El i---_. - P 1 r i , ,_=. FRIC . _ . _ _ } , _._ 3 C C 1 -1 --H H I- El '- 1 . , . _ li _ •_. _ ,..___ . E - . = �i - / I 1/4 .1 .0 , . , / .., . _, , R R 7 . - / il, C ril 11 O J Z I . k Of.. 4,!IF,s' 1.�O' ' • • �uTH ;WfST FJ FYATICNS . 51LVEP) CLOUD INN-hENTON1 DATE JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS. INC. --� Jri kt-rmoJTH-owe); JJNt a'gT 101320 N.E.en • Mini WuhlnOlnn 618004 • 12061 454.0605 ei t lig i. m s 1 ' . . . , 1. ' g 1 g . • ig i 1 1 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 \ In • lo , • mi. a. , _ immi umui ! mum 1 .• a I. . m ,m 1 . , --1 .. ux NZ - 1 g 71c-) • , u H 1 1 1 1 I . PT E M.-- •11 •Ot 7 I CI ri,ILI ., , -- Li --k WO 1111101 , 11111111 °-° . III •Mil ill 6,4 -2 • 'I. IIII - .'.7..... 7 1._ ' --_ H v • 1111 1 1 . . • _ . • .. .. . 11111111 1„„„, immi I IM I 1111 I III _ L- • — . , al ; 1 . F-. 1 F INK •-ii •0 . • II ..1 i nom 11111111 MIR . . 11 MI IIIII 11 a . . ol I 11111111111111111111 1 11 1 L 1J I it l• • • ; . .1.111Homm illim:i 1111noli' _ .7111' im :NI • BE ; m is. • • c I,,% .4,1 . I 11110001111111001U 11111 3,,. . 14. 4 • I • 'Er i Ohl.1 rol.1.1 • , .., "". --11 511.0.010,.., 1 rt _ - . i tillHii - . . . _ ' 1 I 055 . • nvs.,:', ':- i'.-::!;:,,. , 7.-.-,. (i-il +la, k::: 1 NOhTH q I,IMT Fl_TYPUIGNI5 511:YET-) r1 OUD INN- l'"E.NTOI''l DATE '57 JOHN ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES PS. INC. JIM WEYMOUTH- 01.4NE.h .-.. 1‘3 ARC .C=01171EC70 -1. . IMO M.E.8Th • Benno.Wahlnpten 1)1004 • RIM 4543098 I . . .. •a • • AMENDED OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - ,o4 WESTPARIC COMER FILING.3 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 4 i . \ 8 IN THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER ' . t I COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO . SHEET 3 OF 4 . . • Co § g ---------ig-'-,:_-----..-.- i---- i,: , - .:. .. •.: ---: _ , i. ,,....-. , __:_,.._._ °E d .2'Lr' - ___ w rt n• 1,,c , ....-_Li•-- ..c 0 C 44 --- .-0 z g(-•`' - _. _ _. _. 0,..„,„•____. _a - i - •- - i _ • ••. ... • ..•• • ',WANE ORN,H ' gr. ..'. .'..• , 111 IX I " • , . • .. ...- -. I 1 • ,.T' , ®,‘, ....: • . ..,,,- . ti5of . .. • „_ •... .• . • . • . ... . . . . .. . , . , .... -. .. . .. :..•:..: • . • . . .... .• •,‘ ..: ..... ... ••:.••:...--; ;1-1 •'''' L t.t.ter Facfaetree, Sir=Al E.12...,4 6 SIDE ELEVATION . . I/4 = • 42 ...4... - , t :', ', !.- -. .. • 1 . '- _....-......-;_-.- -')...:.-_')...• ''..-.•:-.•-_-.7i---_--2.:-.._ P e , 1 . _ __________ _ 1 CC: ; -_ f-VArrIn MEG ---•-• 7..10/IL.. . __ __ 1,,.- ;Id • _ . ---_ __ _ .. I- .„_-•Hiti—_-— rmol a: 2 • , -1 ) 1 • -XINTS'a .. _ T...'. • ' i ANY" 1 ....1.. CO ;14 in:ANA AANZ.'440.- I ____Ii C11) d..z. - ...• . . .... ,. . . . . tu_, , • . .. c. fra,........, : , ...-,,,.sr./..,2,..,.., 'Pa.'••-• '':,..."7 rc="4.,17." I ' I .. ..• _ . _1 • : imi 6 __,....,. (4,F .0fe• a T.,4Z,''4M4:1:Z. vc,ez.ir.gfigrqcti, trcer..t.• MWZ,41=4:r&c,IRM.-,4 Cl) 1 ....^. 0 SERVICE ELEVATION . 6 ,ENTRY owl i t.ko RelWi 11.L.rPOTHAN2 Iv ev.••••'-o"IONAPV WIEANW-T11,01. .., I-,' 1/4".l-0" I/4".V-0" Sm. sk,g -.•4• -,"--, A :-.-.. ' . ; p'-- Wiero RESTAURANT 1— -•• -1 * ,L . 1_.1i :::. L•- CtIt. i ...,ax • --.. - _.- _ . I ,T, ....,...-----,,.....7 ....•. .. . ,.. ,.,., •.. . . .. , . . 1 ... .•,. • L 11 I 'd 7-1— , :.:: ' ' • •- . 1-,---_I__,...___. , ...:: . .. ' Date:AZ arm.-v1Pc. ' \ \ " . , AVTO Nee pbrrn LAIWW•LITH • ' i'• \ ,i I'.... Rev: ,BL.IS-AG OTOP of CONC SLAB , ,,e- • .. • ::::;f'. ',. . - F : .EXTERIOR . 9 .ENTRY ELEVATION . EXTERIOR FORMS. . ELEVATIONS 1/4°.=I.-0° STUCCO ALIACEIDE(MOE) TRW DARR BROWN ROOF TILE REDISH•BROWN . NOTE.TRASH ENCLOSURE TO MATCH EXT.ELNISHER . 1.. A7 1 . •