Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning _ Development Committee - 09 Jun 2025 - Agenda - Pdf CITY OF RENTON AGENDA - Planning & Development Committee Meeting 5:00 PM - Monday, June 9, 2025 7th Floor Council Conference Room/Videoconference 1. 2025 MID-YEAR TITLE IV DOCKET #20-A a) AB - 3850 Community & Economic Development Department submits additional items for the 2025 Title IV Docket #20. These items will be reviewed by the Planning Commission which will present code revisions to Council. 2. DELIBERATIONS LUA-24-000184: 2024 DOCKET GROUP 19B D-236A: MIDDLE HOUSING STREET STANDARDS UPDATE, ECF a) Presentation 3. 2025 DOCKET 20 GROUP A BRIEFING a) D-239: Co-living b) D-240: Impact Fees Related to Vacant Buildings c) D-241: Commercial Neighborhood and corner Stores/Commercial Uses in Residential Areas 4. EMERGING ISSUES IN CED If you would like to attend this week's meeting remotely, you can do so by going to https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86997277667?pwd=VU9Wb3ZRSCtvM2lOTy9ybUZwZmQ0dz09 Zoom Meeting ID: 869 9727 7667, Passcode: 749418 You can call through Zoom at (253) 215-8782 and use the Meeting ID. AB - 3850 City Council Regular Meeting - 02 Jun 2025 SUBJECT/TITLE: 2025 Mid-Year Title IV Docket #20-A RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Planning & Development Committee DEPARTMENT: Community & Economic Development Department STAFF CONTACT: Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager EXT.: 6576 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: None SUMMARY OF ACTION: Staff has compiled a series of amendments to Title IV of the Renton Municipal Code (Development Regulations) that initiates several regulatory initiatives that respond to important issues facing the City. Planning Commission to conduct review of the Development Regulations (Title IV Docket) and will make recommendations regarding the Land Use Regulations to the Council. Final recommendation of the Title IV Docket is the authority of the Council. EXHIBITS: A. Issue Paper STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Refer the additional items for the 2025 Title IV Docket #20 to the Planning and Development Committee and Planning Commission for review. Following this review, the Planning Commission will present code revision recommendations to Council. AGENDA ITEM #1. a) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 22, 2025 TO: James Alberson, Jr., Council President Members of Renton City Council CC: Armondo Pavone, Mayor FROM: Gina Estep, Communitiy & Economic Development Administrator, x6619 STAFF CONTACT: Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager x6576 SUBJECT: 2025 Mid-Year Title IV Docket #20-A ISSUE: Should the 2025 Mid-Year Title IV Docket #20-A work program be referred to the Planning & Development Committee and the Planning Commission for consideration and potential adoption? RECOMMENDATION: Refer the additional items for the 2025 Title IV Docket #20 to the Planning and Development Committee and Planning Commission for review. Following this review, the Planning Commission will present code revision recommendations to Council. BACKGROUND: RMC 4-8-070G outlines the types of review the Planning Commission shall conduct. The review of the Development Regulations (Title IV Docket) process is specifically listed. Land Use Regulations review occurs upon Council request. The Planning Commission will make recommendations regarding the Land Use Regulations to the Council. Final recommendation of the Title IV Docket is the authority of the Council. Title IV Development Regulations This process is codified in RMC 4-9-025, Title IV Development Regulation Revision Process. Staff has compiled a series of amendments to Title IV of the Renton Municipal Code (Development Regulations) that initiates several regulatory initiatives that respond to important issues facing the City. The proposed list of amendments includes City initiated amendments as shown in the Table below. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact. AGENDA ITEM #1. a) James Alberson, Jr., Council President, Members of Renton City Council Page 2 of 3 05/22/2025 https://cityofrentonwa-my.sharepoint.com/personal/msaelee_rentonwa_gov/documents/desktop/agenda bill/ab 2025 mid year docket items/issue paper - 2025 mid-year docket items - final.docx CONCLUSION: The proposed schedule is for Planning Commission to review the 2025 Mid-Year Title IV Docket #20-A Amendments through December 2025. 2025 MID-YEAR TITLE IV DOCKET #20-A City-Initiated Amendments 1. Indoor Recreation in IL and IM Zones Staff have received requests to help find space for an indoor climbing gym and a gymnasium for gymnastics; both requesters are interested in existing warehouse structures to accommodate their needs, but indoor recreation is not allowed in the IL or IM Zones. Staff would like to explore making a distinction between such facilities from a typical gym and distinguishing different types of indoor recreation facilities and their regulations. Staff have also received inquiries about spa-type uses in zones other than IL and IM. 2. Impact Fees Related to Vacant Buildings Consider amending provisions related to vacant buildings and rate charged if vacant more than 3 years. A large impact fee for many small businesses is a deterrant for them as they startup. Staff would like to review whether this provision incentivizes property owners to lease up vacant buildings or if it serves as a disincentive for new tenants to occupy buildings that have been vacant for an extended time. 3. Large Site Master Plan Flexibility and Development Agreements Development regulations specific for large scale developments that are phased over a longer planning horizon are not anticipated in the city’s current entitlement process. Consider text amendments to the existing master plan regulations for large site large scale projects, add specific provisions for development agreements that provide, and add flexibility to the development standards in either of these processes similar to a Planned Urban Development entitlement. 4. Valley Community Plan The Valley will be changing rapidly in the near future. A new community plan will help ensure we compliment the new additions of the Seattle Sounders, Alaska Airlines, and Blue Origin; the anticipated additions of residential, commercial, and a new major employer; and the existing industry within the Valley Community Planning Area. 5. Encourage Infill in CO Zone Consider allowing standalone accessory uses in the CO Zone where primary uses are already established. Currently, uses deemed to be permitted accessory uses in the CO Zone, such as restaurants, are only allowed if integrated into an office building or a residential mixed-use building; consider allowing such uses to be built as standalone infill development to encourage full utilization of CO-zoned sites. 6. Contractor’s Yard vs. Contractor’s Office Add a new land use and corresponding definition for “Contractor’s Yard.” The two uses have considerably different external impacts and therefore should be distinguished by zoning. AGENDA ITEM #1. a) James Alberson, Jr., Council President, Members of Renton City Council Page 3 of 3 05/22/2025 https://cityofrentonwa-my.sharepoint.com/personal/msaelee_rentonwa_gov/documents/desktop/agenda bill/ab 2025 mid year docket items/issue paper - 2025 mid-year docket items - final.docx 7. Fence Permits Variations from fence or hedge standards are allowed through a special administrative fence permit or through the variance application. Specifically, the special fence permit process (a Type I land use permit) allows increases to fence or hedge height in residential zones from forty-eight inches (48") up to seventy-two inches (72") within the setbacks of front yards, secondary front yards, or rear yards abutting a public or private street, while a variance application (a Type II land use permit) is required for fences or hedges greater than seventy-two inches (72") in height anywhere within a residential zone. This code section should be amended to allow all residential fence or hedge height increases through the special administrative fence permit process. In addition, the special administrative fence permit evaluation criteria would be more applicable than the variance decision criteria for this circumstance. 8. Condominium Regulations Propose city review process for new residential condominium development within residential zoning districts. Current condominium regulations are limited to conversions of existing multifamily buildings into condominimun or cooperative units and via the binding site plan process within commercial zoning districts. Recent Middle Housing legislation has mandated cities to allow for condominiums in new residential development that would occur in residential zones and existing city regulations do not have a process to review and currently the process defaults to King County. 9. Design and Construction Manual A Design and Construction Standards Manual would establish consistent, comprehensive guidelines for public and private infrastructure development within the city. It would be developed through collaboration among City departments—including Community and Economic Development, Public Works, and Parks and Recreation— and would consolidate technical standards, permitting procedures, and construction requirements into a single, accessible resource. The manual would be periodically reviewed and updated to reflect changes in regulations, best practices, and community goals, ensuring it remains current and effective. cc: Matt Herrera, Planning Director Brianne Bannwarth, Development Engineering Director AGENDA ITEM #1. a) D-236A: Middle Housing Street Standards UpdatePlanning & Development Committee Recommendations Angelea Weihs, Associate Planner June 9, 2025 AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) MIDDLE HOUSING UPDATE PROPOSALS – UNIT TYPES BACKGROUND In 2023, the Washington State Legislature passed a series of bills, including: HB 1110 (Middle Housing): requires cities to allow Middle Housing in residential zones with up to 4 units per lot, and up to 6 units per lot if within a 1/4-mile walking distance of a major transit stop. HB 1337 (ADUs): requires cities to allow at least 2 ADUs per lot within all zones that allow single-family. Also mandates that a city may not require public street improvements for ADUs. Major Transit Stops: HB 1110 and HB 1337 prohibit cities from requiring off-street parking for middle housing or ADUs when the lot is located within a ½ mile of a Major Transit Stop. Additional Parking Restrictions: mandates limit on-site parking that cities can require, based on lot size: 6,000 SF or less: 1 parking space per unit 6,000 SF or greater: 2 parking spaces per unit AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) MIDDLE HOUSING UPDATE PROPOSALS – UNIT TYPES OTHER LEGISLATION IN THE HORIZON Washington State Legislature recently passed other bills that impact on-site parking, including: SB 5184 (Parking Reform): Senate Bill 5184 aims to reform parking requirements by limiting the amount of parking cities can require for development, as follows: o Cities may not require more than 0.5 parking space per multi-family dwelling. o Cities may not require more than 1 parking space per single-family dwelling. o Cities may not require more than 2 parking spaces per 1,000 SF of commercial space. o Cities may not require minimum parking for: homes < 1,200sf,commercial < 3,000sf, affordable/senior housing, childcare, Ground-level commercial, or changes of use. Compliance Required by December 2026. HB 1998 (Co-Living): HB 1998 requires cities to allow co-living on any lot that allows at least 6 multi-family dwellings. HB 1998 limits the amount of parking cities can require as follows: o Cities may not require off-street parking within ½ mile of a major transit stop; or o Cities may not require more than 0.25 off-street parking spaces per sleeping unit. Compliance required by December 2025. AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) MIDDLE HOUSING UPDATE PROPOSALS – UNIT TYPES AMENDMENT PURPOSE To mitigate for the parking limitations imposed by State Legislation, staff proposes amendments to the street standards to: Provide one (1) additional parking lane for the residential access street classification; and Provide additional limitations for limited residential access streets and shared driveways to: o Ensure appropriate traffic volumes based on the intended use of these streets. o Ensure streets can accommodate vehicles while maintaining emergency access. This proposal would require only 3 additional feet of ROW dedication on each side. AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) MIDDLE HOUSING UPDATE PROPOSALS – UNIT TYPES PROPOSAL SUMMARY The following summarized key revisions to RMC 4-6-060, Street Standards, are proposed: Exempt ADUs from the requirement for street improvements, in compliance with HB 1337. Update Residential Access Street standards to require a 6-foot parking lane on both sides of the street. Continue the practice of allowing modifications to standards when warranted. Update Limited Residential Access Street standards to require two 10-foot travel lanes. Provide criteria limiting when the Limited Residential Access Street classification can be utilized. Update shared driveway standards to allow a maximum of 1 primary dwelling and 1 ADU (attached or detached) per lot. Update half-street standards to include a parking lane for consistency with amendments described above, and to ensure consistency with current procedures. AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) MIDDLE HOUSING UPDATE PROPOSALS – UNIT TYPES STAFF RECOMMENDATION Amend RMC 4-6-060, Street Standards, as described above, to mitigate for the legislative mandates restricting parking requirements as indicated in HB 1110 and HB 1337, by providing more opportunities for on-street parking, as well as providing restrictions for lots that are accessed via shared driveways and limited residential access streets. AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) MIDDLE HOUSING UPDATE PROPOSALS – UNIT TYPES THANK YOU!!! AG E N D A I T E M # 2 . a ) D-239: Co-Living UpdatePlanning & Development Committee Briefing Angelea Weihs, Associate Planner June 9, 2025 AG E N D A I T E M # 3 . a ) MIDDLE HOUSING UPDATE PROPOSALS – UNIT TYPES BACKGROUND In 2024, the Washington State Legislature passed House Bill (HB) 1998, which aims to expand flexible housing options and streamline co-living development in urban areas. This bill mandates that cities must allow co-living as a permitted use on any lot that permits at least 6 multi-family residential units, including those zoned for mixed-use development. Co-living housing is defined as: “Residential development with sleeping units that are independently rented and lockable and provide living and sleeping space, and residents share kitchen facilities with other sleeping units in the building.” The legislation also establishes standards related to unit size, parking, density, fees, etc. Renton is required to implement the new housing regulation by December 31, 2025. AG E N D A I T E M # 3 . a ) KEY PROVISIONS OF HB 1998 Zoning: Co-living must be a permitted use on any lot that permits at least 6 multi-family units, without any additional restrictions compared to other multi-family uses in the same zone. Development Standards: Standards for co-living housing cannot be stricter than those for other multi-family units in the same zone. Unit Standards: Cities cannot impose: Room size or unit dimension requirements beyond the state building code, or Requirements for a mix of unit sizes or number of bedrooms. Mixed -Use: Cities cannot require mandatory inclusion of commercial uses, unless those uses are also required for other multi-family dwelling types. AG E N D A I T E M # 3 . a ) KEY PROVISIONS OF HB 1998 – CONTINUED Parking: Cities cannot require off-street parking within a 0.5 mile walking distance (walkshed) of a major transit stop. Outside of that walkshed, cities may only require up to 0.25 parking space per sleeping unit. Affordable Housing Incentive Programs: Co-living units must be eligible for affordable housing incentives, such as the MFTE program, Waived Fees program, and Density Bonus. Density: For density calculations, cities must treat a co-living unit as equal to 0.25 of a dwelling unit. Sewer Connection Fees: For sewer connection fees, cities must treat a sleeping unit as no more than 0.5 of a dwelling unit. AG E N D A I T E M # 3 . a ) MIDDLE HOUSING UPDATE PROPOSALS – UNIT TYPESNEXT STEPS Planning Commission Briefing: June 18, 2025 Planning Commission Public Hearing: July 2, 2025 AG E N D A I T E M # 3 . a )