Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA96-126 (2)
• City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone LUA-96-126,ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE:December 3, 1996 Page 1 of 5. PUBLIC City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARYAND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date December 3, 1996 • Project Name Brain Rezone • Applicant City of Renton,Planning/Building/Public Works Department File Number LUA-96-126,ECF,R Project Description City initiated rezone of an irregular shaped 1.32 acre site from Public Use (P-1) Zone to the Commercial Office(CO)Zone. Project Location 3901 Talbot Road S.,Renton,WA. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: . 1. Owner of Record Dr. Eugene Brain,DDS 5454 Lake Washington Blvd. SE Bellevue,WA 98006 2. Zoning Designation Public Use(P-1)Zone • 3. Comprehensive Plan Center Institution Land Use Designation 4. Existing Site Use Vacant 5. Neighborhood Characteristics . • .__ North Immediately to the north are Panther Creek greenbelt and vacant CONCURRENCE 5.62 acre site proposed for future retirement residence. Uses around S. 38th Court include medical and dental offices/clinics. DATE //-/441k__ North of S. 37th Street area is single-family residences. NAME I T AL/DATE p /e-r-070 East Single-family residential uses predominate across Talbot Road S. '.Uk/ li-z South Valley Medical Center is the predominate use south of the subject site. Uses at VMC closest to the subject property include medical office buildings and a large parking structure. 4 _ _ DRBRAIN.DOC/ • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION •;:::, :-CITY'OF.RENTON•:'. ,= '_;4 NOTICE OF ORDINANCES`ADOPT.ED.;•; t Ktistina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of : bg';:1.BY RENTON;CITY:4ZOUNCIL : .; the , Following;are summaries of;ordinances'7, adopted by the Renton`,Cityl.Council'onFob-. ruary AO;;1997.::'>u;:S_s =l; , .,:i::,;E, a,_.; SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 'f'r.•n :J ORDINANCE;niO°f4652,..Renton _ w :9 :rrAn^-`'.ordinances of;theR;City',of;Rente 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 : Washingtono.changing;thezoningiclassifica g $1 lion`.of approximately-1:32iacres'.lecated.* 3901!Talbot:Rd.:S.from.P-1'(Public-Use)to,";'' a dailynewspaper seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a le al CO.(Commercial,Office);.(Brain;Rezone;;File•. publishedg Nor.1:9-026).,''4:-' =f+, !,47::f 9 j newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months - Effective:2i119/97-a;;.;4" `;;�'4r;.; t. .�: prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language ""` �• ;`ORDINANCE N0:,4653�f -, ,'An;'';ordinances of. the'YCitiCof,:Renton'' continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County washingion changing the3zoning classifica,,;9 .' Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the tion.oCapproximately.:1.02"acres"located;at;, State of Washington for King County. 3731`Talbot.Rd:"S:rfrom;P-11(Public'use),`to;:: The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the South CountyCOezonemme.Noloffice)3Ii t4-6 ,7,-irise } Rezone;;File No._R-90.,,, '>- ,r,. ,4,j : Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Effective:2/19/97�'`i `-,..,1\ _. �Fl;=7,f}Tv_- ?i:,_": ORDINANCENO::4654 ':'<,� sr ',; duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice, a „ , ' , An;'ordinance:of ;then City,p Renton., Washington`.changing"therzoning ciassifica,ig Notice of Ordinances Adopted tion>of approximately 0.91 acres located;at: 3711;Talbot Rd..V.from2 P-ix(PubliciUse)WI- .CO;(Commercial:Office).(Frary^Rezone Fle:'4 as published on: 2/14/97 No.'R-96-129).•: !4. ....<,f='- -- .i ; The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$72.99 ;--..<.r„ : :-,-,.,;, r.;;�;,,I... --,- 4;•Effective.,2/19/97 '-`�`' : ''- ''-'?-'''' Legal Number VN2564 iv - �,•' -3� Y'ORDINANCE;NO'`4655;::=. ;; ,: A An,-ordinance:;.of 'the„City;`of%Renton:I - Washington:.changing;the.zoning'claseifica= tion of;approximately.0.52•acres'located'at. = 400 S..i38th::Ct:from;P=1)'(PubliciUse);to CO.; Legal Clerk, th Coun Journal ;;(CommercialOffice) (0'BrienRezone; File` Non R-96-127).•_a r.u ,7..Ca:` :s_ ...,:,:4''�: .�: i:Effective.2/19/97.` % ".: `= "-`«+•{ ,rr< ., ,T >>�5s;''.ORDINANC `. ...;;;t Subscribed and sworn before me on this ( 0 day of 7�v_ , 19 7 a==•An,ordinance=,of<theif,City of Renton,, , , ',;Washington,changingsthe zoninMciassifica tion A approximately.5:52 acres°•Iocatedl'att `� � � t (Co S:38t al Of ice)FSpnn blirooke j )to,CON �(Commercial:�Officej,�(Springtirook" L s:Rez �Associ e,ate one;F' 96.128"�"�:=sar;�=f.•_ ,:Effective21.9/97.�'1-�,;� ;s��;��-rs.'�z��.=�•. ....i if' r. otary Public of the State of Washington ';.Complete,texts'of hesexord~inances are' i,postedLLat'the,,Renton Munici al-Build'. 4 . l residing in-Renton- .,-- Sr200='Mill`AvenuetSouth 'andpthe Renton::' e Ica NpTA R y' King County, Washington Public4library, 100;4 Mill';Avenue':South;; *. :* Upon-.request`to the>,City Clerk's Foffice ‘tect)SvPii B` C t (235 2501).copies wil so berrriailed:for<'ah'al4•,, \� % 'J., eterse ;;:! <�a`'%;:, rr ° < ,?;i j►y . ,y� 1;Marilyny P n ;' .. J:�: , h +/ City Clerki-.a_3r.,';fi. ,..:.., ,. ,:.,.. 1' Fop 'r -•Publishedin=the'South:`Co n `Journal �� ' ruary 14;19 5 . ;u ty` ' ���‘ ,". ' Feb. .... 97:2 B4';:,.,::'#_:-i't,:: • February 10. 1997 Renton City Council Minutes Page 43 to grant latecomer agreements for a period of ten years with the option for a five-year extension if requested by the developer in a timely manner. The current latecomer agreement will expire on March 15, 1997, unless extended. The developer has made a timely request for extension. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utility: 1997 Annual Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report recommending Consultant Contract List concurrence in the staff recommendation that Council authorize inclusion of the proposed list,of consultants for water, sanitary sewer, and surface water; hydraulics/hydrology; geohydrology; and soils/geotechnical engineering, services into the roster of annual consultants to be used for the year 1997, as follows: Geohydrology: CH2M Hill, Golder Associates, and Pacific Groundwater Group. Soils/Geotechnical: Agra Earth and Environmental, CH2M Hill, Golder Associates, and Kleinfelder. General Utility Engineering: Brown and Caldwell, CH2M Hill, Coughlin Porter Lundeen, Economic and Engineering Services, Inc., Hammond, Collier & Wade-Livingstone Associates, Inc., HDR Engineering, Inc., KCM, Inc:, RH2 Engineers, R.W. Beck, and SvR Design Company. Hydraulics/Hydrology: Entranco, Harza Northwest, Inc., Northwest Hydraulics Consultants, Inc., Parametrix,Inc., West Consultants, Inc., and R.W. Beck. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY SCHLITZERR, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Committee,member Schlitzer noted that the Committee performed a thorough review of all the proposed consultants, asking many questions of staff which were met with complete and satisfactory answers.. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution #3243 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Sunset interlocal agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation Blvd/Anacortes Ave NE (WSDOT) for realignment of Anacortes Ave. NE and NE Sunset Boulevard. Safety Improvements, MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT WSDOT Funding THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Resolution #3244 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Metro: Commute Trip interlocal cooperative agreement with King County entitled "Commute Trip Reduction Services for Reduction.Act Implementation Agreement." MOVED BY CORMAN, 1997, CAG-97- SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading: Ordinance #4652 An ordinance was read rezoning approximately 1.32 acres located at 3901 Rezone: 3901 Talbot Rd S . Talbot Rd. S. (Brain) from P-1 (Public Use) to Commercial Office (CO) Zone. (Brain), from P-1 to CO, MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, R-96-126 COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. it) ' CITY. OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4652 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON' FROM P-1 (PUBLIC USE) TO CO (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) (BRAIN REZONE; FILE NO. LUA-96-126, R) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) , of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code .of General Ordinances of the . Cityof Renton, " as amended, and maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as P-1 (Public Use) ; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification ' of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and . a public hearing having been held thereon on or, about December 3 , 1996, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner, and said zoning request having been recommended, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City -Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE .CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4652 SECTION I . The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to CO (Commercial Office) as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated January 13, 1997; the Development Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property, approximately 1 .32 acres, is located at ' the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South, at 3901 Talbot Road ' South. ) SECTION II . This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. 1 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 10th day of February , 1997 . Marilyn(Z . retersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR thisl0th day of February , 1997 . Jest e Tanner, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney i� Date of Publication: 2/14/97 _ ORD`637 :1/28/97 :as . 2 LAHht$1 1 .`A' PR-14 EXHIBIT"A" BRAIN PROPERTY • REZONE FROM PUBLIC USE(P-1) TO COMMERCIAL OFFICE(CO) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A of Valley General Hospital - Dr. Brain Short Plat, City of Renton Short Plat No. 78-213, Recorded under King County Recording No. 7812149018,Records of King County,Washington. All situate in the Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 23-North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County,Washington. TOGETHER WITH the north 85 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 31, • Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County,Washington, lying westerly of the county road (Talbot Road South, Springbrook Road,96th Ave. S.) and easterly of a line lying.300 feet westerly of, as measured along the north line of said subdivision,the westerly right-of-way line of said county,road. • • • • • BRAIN.DOC1 EXHIBIT ' - `f- tz-8 r • g (15 Ilk ' ' CD filif ______________ (L) K+y/. Tity a �j�w�j _ 11r� 7V�J �i yr E5 i > _ t .41”,,,,,,„, AN Q) ilat _ _ whatimii . oc5 . S. al e ' Eat a thSt II ''''' I 77., -- ma R . i R-6 12-I illei . R-s . 4111 1163 3 • i 0 th f . -.., C/` 4 li ,, P- 1 N '' W7th . Av . . Slii, ,,,,: 41P • .1 .)?-- ,, F- 1 '-c° 0,ia: 0 0 ; 0 00 lablibb._ . o • , LONG RANGE PLANNING + + Don Erickson LANDUSE ACTION FILE #96-126 tie"' 7 D1996`k' REZONES FILE #PR-14 0 300 600 FROM P- 1 TO CO il REZONE SITE 1 :3 6 0 0 CITY LIMITS February 3, 1997 Renton. City Council Minutes Page.34' Rezone: 3901 Talbot Rd S An ordinance was read rezoning approximately 1.32 acres located at 3901 (Brain), from P-1 to CO, Talbot Rd. S. (Brain) from P-1 (Public Use) to Commercial Office (CO). R-96-I26 MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 2/10/97. CARRIED. Rezone: 3731 Talbot Rd S An ordinance was read rezoning approximately 1.02 acres located at 3731 (D&R Enterprises), from Talbot Rd. S. (D&R Enterprises) from P-1 (Public Use) to Commercial Office P-1 to CO, R-96-130 (CO). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 2/10/97. CARRIED. Rezone: 3711 Talbot Rd S An ordinance was read rezoning approximately 0.9I acres located at 3711' (Frary), from P-1 to CO, Talbot Rd. S. (Frary) from P-1 (Public Use) to Commercial Office (CO). R-96-129 MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER,_ COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND.FINAL READING ON 2/10/97. CARRIED. Rezone: 400 S 38th Ct An ordinance was read rezoning approximately 0.52 acres located at 400 S. (O'Brien), from P-I to 38th Ct. (O'Brien) from P-1 (Public Use) to Commercial Office (CO). CO, R-96-127 MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON, 2/10/97. CARRIED. Rezone: 403 S 38th Ct An ordinance was read rezoning approximately 5.62 acres Iocated at 403 S. (Springbrook Associates), 38th Ct. (Springbrook Associates) from P-1 (Public Use) to Commercial Office from P-1 to CO, R-96- (CO), MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED. BY SCHLITZER„ 128 COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL__ READING ON 2/10/97. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler announced that at the Executive-Session. Council: Sound Mazda held on January 27th, Council asked the Administration to prepare a Notice off (Lycette/Blume) Property Exercise of Option for the Lycette/Blume property in downtown Renton. The Purchase, Burnett & property, currently occupied by Sound Mazda, is located, between Burnett and'. Logan and S 2nd & 3rd Logan, adjacent to the Downtown Transit. Center. The property will be combined with parcels the City already owns for development of a downtown.,. plaza or town square. The City Attorney has prepared the Notice of Option to Purchase. The purchase price of the property is $1 million, of which $400,000.was authorized by Council for this purpose in the 1997 budget. The balance of the purchase price will be funded from the 1996 year-end carryover. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE OPTION AND ALLOCATE SUFFICIENT FUNDS FROM THE 1996 YEAR-END CARRYOVER TO) PURCHASE THE LYCETTE/BLUME (SOUND MAZDA) PROPERTY. CARRIED. Parks: Cedar River Councilman Schlitzer relayed comments received from the Senior Citizen's< Walkway Flooding, Access Advisory Board on the difficulty experienced in crossing Logan Ave. S. when Across Logan Ave the Cedar River walkway is inaccessible due to flooding. Many seniors have expressed a desire for a pedestrian-safe alternative to crossing Logan. Mayor Tanner agreed to look into this matter. February 3, 1997 Renton City Council Minutes Page 33 property into lots less than 60 feet in width. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. Rezone: 3901 Talbot Rd S Hearing Examiner recommended approval of City-sponsored rezone of the (Brain), from P-1 to CO, Brain property, 3901 Talbot Rd. S., from P-I (Public Use) to Commercial R-96-126 Office (CO), File No. R-96-126. Council concur. (See page 34 for ordinance.) Rezone: 3731 Talbot Rd S Hearing Examiner recommended approval of City-sponsored rezone of the (D&R Enterprises), from D&R Enterprises property, 3731 Talbot Rd. S., from P-I (Public Use) to P-1 to CO, R-96-130 Commercial Office (CO), File No. R-96-130. Council concur. (See page 34; for ordinance.) Rezone: 3711 Talbot Rd S Hearing Examiner recommended approval of City-sponsored rezone of the (Frary), from P-1 to CO, Frary property, 3711 Talbot Rd. S., from P-1 (Public Use) to Commercial R-96-129 Office (CO), File No. R-96-129. Council concur. (See page 34 for ordinance.) Rezone: 400 S 38th Ct Hearing Examiner recommended approval of City-sponsored rezone of the (O'Brien), from P-1 to O'Brien property, 400 S. 38th Ct., from P-1 (Public Use) to Commercial CO, R-96-127 Office (CO), File No. R-96-127. Council concur. (See page 34 for ordinance.) Rezone: 403 S 38th Ct Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with condition, of City-sponsored, (Springbrook Associates), rezone of the Springbrook Associates property, 403 S. 38th Ct., from P-1, from P-1 to CO, R-96- (Public Use) to Commercial Office (CO), File No. R-96-128. Council concur.:. 128 (See page 34 for ordinance.) Metro: Commute Trip Transportation Systems Division submitted proposed contract with the King Reduction Services for County Transit Department for the provision of Commute Trip Reduction 1997, CAG-97- services to Renton employers through December 31, 1997. The $41,324 cost is. fully funded through grant money received from King County. Refer tar Transportation Committee. CAG: 94-073, Union Ave Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-94-073, Bituminous Surface NE Chip Seal, City Treatment ("chip seal") for Union Ave. .NE; and requested approval of the Transfer of Kent project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $3,167.85, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $2,790.28 to City Transfer of Kent, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Utility: 1997 Annual, Utility Systems Division requested approval of the proposed annual consultant Consultant Contract List contract list for water, sanitary sewer, surface water, hydraulics/hydrology, geohydrology, and soils/geotechnical engineering services for the year 1997. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER,. COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Greg Aalto, 270 Bronson Way NE, suggesting Citizen Comment: Aalto - that the City restore the usefulness of the lower Cedar River walkway, which. Flooding on Cedar River is often flooded during the wintertime, by laying down additional concrete on_. Walkway the sidewalk to raise the level of the walking path above the water. ORDINANCES AND The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the RESOLUTIONS Council meeting of 2/10/97 for second and final reading: CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: 5 •C ' SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: Dept/Div/Board.. HEARING EXAMINER 2143)611 Staff Contact... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 2593 AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: City sponsored rezone of Brain Property Public Hearing.. from P-1 (Public Use)to CO(Commercial Office)Zone Correspondence.. Location: 3901 Talbot Road South Ordinance XX File No.LUA 96-126,R Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: 1. Hearing Examiner's Report New Business.... 2. Ordinance study Session..: Other RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Hearing Examiner's Recommendation APPROVALS: and adopt ordinance. Legal Dept Finance Dept.... Other • FISCAL IMPACT: N/A • Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: In June 1994, City Council directed Planning/Building/Public Works to proceed with assimilation of the P-1 Zone into the other zones adopted in June 1993. The other zones do accommodate most, if not all of the uses that were typically allowed in the P-1 zone. The Hearing Examiner recommended that the subject site not be reclassified as CO zone in his report dated December 17, 1996. Upon reconsideration dated January 13, 1997, he recommended approval of the City- sponsored rezone. No appeals were received during the appeal period which ended January 27, 1997. Neither the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)nor Hearing Examiner imposed conditions on this rezone. The Examiner recommends that City Council approve reclassification of the subject property from P-1 to CO. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • Approve. December 17, 1996 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: City of Renton Brain Rezone File No.: LUA-96-126,R LOCATION: 3901 Talbot Road South SUMMARY OF REQUEST: City-initiated rezone of an irregular shaped 1.32 acre site from Public Use(P-1)zone to the Commercial Office(CO)zone. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on November 26, 1996. PUBLIC HEARING: In accordance with Section 4-8-14(C)(2),the Hearing Examiner shall determine if a change of zone classification is advisable, in the public interest,tends to further the preservation and enjoyment of any substantial property rights of the petitioner, is not materially detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other persons located in the vicinity thereof,and is in harmony with the purposes and effect of the Comprehensive Plan. In such event,the Hearing Examiner may recommend that the City Council approve the change of the zone classification. EXHIBITS: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing application,proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.2: Site plan MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the December 3, 1996 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, December 3, 1996,at 9:03 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. City project manager, DONALD ERICKSON,P/B/PW Special Projects, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue. South, Renton, Washington 98055, presented the staff report. He explained that when the City prepared its Comprehensive Plan in 1993 it deferred making changes to the Public Use(P-1)zone to allow more time to study existing P-1 uses. Originally,the P-1 zone was intended to recognize public ownership and to provide a .b i . Cityilof Renton Brain Rezone FileiNo.: LUA-96-126,R December 17, 1996 1. Page,2 process that would expedite development. The study found that the City's new zoning allows the same public uses in virtually every zone. It was also found that a relatively high percentage of actual public-uses are not located in the P-1 zones. For example, City Hall and the Fire Station are in the commercial zone and schools and parks are generally located in single family zones. Staff proposed to the City Council's Planning and Development Committee that the City should either assimilate all public uses in P-1 zones or allow for public 1. uses in all other zones. The City Council chose the latter recommendation since there are adequate provisions in other zones to accommodate public uses and it would be more consistent with the Growth Management Act. Mr.Erickson stated that approval to rezone the subject site from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO) Zone is requested. The subject site is an irregular shaped 1.32 acre parcel located at 3901 Talbot Road South. It is near Valley Medical Hospital and is vacant at this time. There are medical offices and related uses to the south and west,to the east is single family residential,and to the north is a vacant parcel proposed for future retirement residence. In dosing,Mr.Erickson recommended approval of this rezone request for the following reasons: (1) the rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for this parcel;(2)the rezone is consistent with City policies that encourage the location and siting of smaller scale health care facilities such as clinics,practitioner's offices,convalescent centers,and similar uses in centers rather than being geographically dispiersed throughout the City. In this case,because of the intensity of some of these smaller-scale health care facilities, it is proposed that they remain in the Center Institution center,and be zoned consistent with other commercial office uses, including clinics in the area;(3)that the rezone is consistent with the proposed rezones of ailutting privatelyyheld Public Use zoned properties to the CO Zone. Four other privately held P-1 zoned properties are also proposed to be rezoned to the CO Zone. This is important because the minimum lot size in thisizone is 25,000 square feet,and some of these lots may have to be consolidated to achieve full development potential; (4)the subject rezone is a non-project action under SEPA and is a legislative act which of and by itself will not result in new development although it will provide the potential for more intense uses than allowed in the existing P-1 Zone since the CO Zone has the potential of allowing twenty(20)story buildings because this zone allows building heights of up to 250 feet for developments on sites larger than 25,000 square feet! TheE Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff The hearing closed at 9:32 a.m. FINDINGS.CONCLUSIONS&RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, City of Renton, filed a request to reclassify the subject site from P-1 (Public/Quasi- public)to CO(Commercial Office). - 2. ' The City of Renton filed requests for approval of a series of approximately forty(40)or fifty(50) separate rezones,involving a series of separate properties generally but not always owned by public agencies including the City, King County and the Renton School District. The City proposes phasing out its P-1 Zone, a zone that in the past was designed to accommodate public and quasi-public uses. City of Renton Brain Rezone File No.: LUA-96-126,R December 17, 1996 Page 3 Each of the proposals requests that the new zoning be changed to closely, if not exactly match, surrounding zoning districts and the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 4. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance(DNS)for the subject proposal. 5. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 6. While the background information on the study and proposed abolition of the P-1 zone will be the same for each report, each site will receive separate attention and a separate decision. 7. The P-1 (Public/QuasiPublic)Zone was established in the early 1950's to accommodate governmental facilities as well as certain private uses such as private medical clinics and private hospitals,as well as private schools,museums and the like that accommodated the public. The permitted uses were expanded over the years to accommodate an even wider range of uses while other zoning districts also broadened their range of respective uses,in effect,duplicating the permitted uses in the P-1 zone. The current zoning categorization generally appears to accommodate most,although not all,of the uses the current P-1 zone permits. The City Council directed staff to make a recommendation as to the continued need for a distinct P-1 zone. A result of that study was presented to the Planning Commission(May 4, 1994 Report). The Planning Commission recommended the assimilation of the P-1 zone. The City Council then directed that individual parcels be assimilated into nearby,compatible zones after appropriate public hearings. The current action is the result of those decisions. 8. The subject site is located at 3901 Talbot Road South. The site is approximately 1.32 acres in size and has a trapezoidal shape,being wider to the rear or west end of the site. 9. The site is at the north edge of the Valley Medical Center complex. Two companion parcels north of the site along Talbot are also being considered for reclassification to CO. In addition,two parcels located north of these parcels on South 37th Street are also being considered for similar rezoning treatment. 10. The City proposes designating the site CO. While the City has attached a special P-suffix designation to any public property which will be reclassified from P-1,that suffix will not be attached to private properties if they are reclassified from P-1 to another designation. Rather,they will be treated like all other private property for development or sale purposes. 11. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development Center Institutional uses,represented in general by uses such as Valley Medical Center and Renton Technical College,but does not mandate,such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. _ 12. The height limits of the CO permit buildings with a height of up to 250 feet whereas the current P-1 Zone limits building height to generally 50 feet. Commercial Office Height Limits: Cityg of Renton Braip Rezone File LUA-96-126,R December 17, 1996 Page 4 §4-31-16D4. Height: §4-31-16D4a. General: A maximum of two hundred and fifty feet(250'). §4-31-16D4b. Special Height Allowances: • §4-31-16D4b(1). Heights may exceed the maximum height by up to fifty feet (50')with bonuses for plazas and other amenities, subject to a Hearing Examiner conditional use permit. §4-31-16D4b(2). When a building is adjacent to a lot designated as residential on the City Comprehensive Plan,the building may exceed the height allowed in the adjacent residential-zone by a maximum of twenty feet(20'). 13. Staff has noted that they have interpreted"adjacent"as meaning immediately abutting and that an intervening street removes this limitation. 14. Zoning in the area consists of two predominant zoning districts including the existing P-1 zoning. East, northeast,north and west of an adjoining.parcel is'R-8 (Residential Single Family)Zoning. King County is located east and southeast and its zoning is residential and office related south toward Carr Road. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest,that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare,and in addition complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-8-14,which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis;or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or C. ' There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The CO Zone's potential height of 250 feet makes it inappropriate for this site and the reclassification should be denied. 2. The P-1 district and its associated properties were removed from the city-wide reclassification effort to study the basis for the zone itself. This site as well as the other P-1 properties were segregated for special review. The public hearing that preceded this recommendation is the first analysis since that study demonstrated that there is no reason to maintain the P-1 zones. . 3. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area as suitable Center Institution but appears to designate property east, north and even west of the site for single family uses.-The Center Institution designation in the Comprehensive Plan does not necessarily require CO Zoning, but apparently the CO Zone comes the closest to permitting the uses proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. At the same time Policy LU- 143 suggests small-scale health care facilities in neighborhoods. • City of Renton Brain Rezone File No.: LUA-96-126,R December 17, 1996 Page 5 4. It is clear that the possible 250 foot height permitted in CO Zone could introduce buildings that are completely out of scale with the nearby single family zones and more importantly the single family uses located across Talbot. While staff has suggested that the site plan review process required for development in this zone and the application of SEPA review could ameliorate those impacts that reliance seems misplaced. The site plan ordinance has been more recently limited to guiding development rather than conditioning it or Significantly scaling back the intensity of development. 5. It would be inappropriate to rely on either site plan review or even SEPA after generally vesting certain rights in property, in this case,height limits, if 250 feet tall can be called limits. Neither SEPA nor the site plan review process are intended to ultimately control neighborhood character. That is the overriding purpose of the Zoning Code. The zoning requested at this juncture would permit 250 foot tall structures on property located very close to single family zones in which 35 foot tall structures predominate. That appears inappropriate. 6. Talbot Road does not appear to provide either sufficient setback or buffering to protect the interests of the single family homes east of the site or even those north of the site,north of S.37th Street. In addition,there is no review of the shadow impacts of a potentially 250 foot tall.structure on the homes north and west of the subject site(s)and in this latitude shadow impacts of buildings located to the south,particularly on single family amenities,should be reviewed before zoning is imposed which would permit substantial shading impacts to be created. 7. Without analysis of such impacts,the rezone is untimely and should not be approved. There was not sufficient information provided and the Comprehensive Plan would at the moment not support consideration of other zoning categories at this juncture. 8. As with site plan review and SEPA, it has been shown that the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan cannot be used to lessen the density of plats where the proposed density has been determined to be intrusive and out of character with surrounding uses. Therefore,there should be no mistaken reliance on other polices or regulations when the zoning would permit 250 foot tall buildings. 9. While granting such zoning does not require 250 foot tall buildings and there are no plans for anything that large,approving the requested zoning does vest the right to potentially develop such structures. In this area,that would be inappropriate. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should not approve the reclassification of the subject site from P-1 to CO. ORDERED THIS 17th day of December, 1996. FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E MINER City of Renton - Brain Rezone File iNo.: LUA-96-126,R December 17, 1996 Page 6 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of December, 1996 to the parties of record: Don Erickson Dr. Eugene Brain 200 Mill Avenue S 7710 Taneum Road W Renton, WA 98055 Thorp, WA 98946 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of December, 1996 to the.following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney James Chandler,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,December 31, 1996. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the • Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hali. { lithe Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all inter' parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • City of Renton P/B/PW.Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone LUA-96-126,ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE:December 3, 1996 V Page 1 of 5 PUBLIC City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING V PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date December 3, 1996 Project Name Brain Rezone Applicant City of Renton,Planning/Building/Public Works Department File Number LUA-96-126,ECF,R Project Description City initiated rezone of an irregular shaped 1.32 acre site from Public Use(P-1) Zone to the Commercial Office(CO)Zone. Project Location .3901 Talbot Road S.,Renton,WA. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record Dr.Eugene Brain,DDS 5454 Lake Washington Blvd. SE Bellevue,WA 98006 2. Zoning Designation Public Use(P-1)Zone 3. Comprehensive Plan Center Institution Land Use Designation - 4. Existing Site Use Vacant 5. Neighborhood Characteristics North Immediately to the north are Panther Creek greenbelt and vacant 5.62 acre site proposed for future retirement residence. Uses around S. 38th Court include medical and dental offices/clinics. North of S. 37th Street area is single-family residences. East Single-family residential uses predominate across Talbot Road S. South Valley Medical Center is the predominate use south of the subject site. Uses at VMC closest to the subject property include medical office buildings and a large parking structure. DRBRAIN.DOC/ V City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone LUA-96-126,ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 3, 1996 Page 2 of 5 West Valley Medical Center's North Campus and specifically the Medic Services building and at-grade parking lots. Further to the west is VMC's larger multi-story parking garage. 6. Access Talbot Road South. 7.. Site Area 1.32 acres 8. Project Data: Area Comments Existing Building Area NA Not applicable, non-project action rezone New Building Area NA Not applicable,non-project action rezone Total Building Area NA Not applicable, non-project action rezone • C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Adopt Comp Plan with 4496 February 20, 1995 Area-wide Land Use and Zoning Maps including • Zone Name Changes Adoption of Draft Comp 4405 June 7, 1993 Plan with Area-wide Land Use and Zoning Maps Adoption of Interim 4404 June 7, 1993 Zoning Code D. PUBLIC SERVICES: Utilities Water Not applicable,non-project action rezone Sewer Not applicable,non-project action rezone Surface Water/Storm Water Not applicable,non-project action rezone 12. Fire Protection Not applicable,non-project action rezone 1 13. Transit Not applicable,non-project action rezone 1 14. Schools Not applicable,non-project action rezone '5. Recreation Not applicable,non-project action rezone 6. Other ••/ Not applicable,non-project action rezone • • • DRBRAIN.DOC/ • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone • LUA-96-126,ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE:December 3, 1996 • Page 3 of 5 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTONMUNICIPAL-CODE: 1. Section 4-8-14.C., Change of Zone Classification(Rezone) •. • 2. Section 4-31-9, Public Use Zone(P-1) 3. Section 4-31-16, Commercial Office Zone F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Policy LU-MO. Regional health and/or medical facilities larger than five acres should be located in institution medical centers. Policy LU-143. Small-scale health care facilities(e.g. minor emergency clinics,practitioner offices)should be encouraged to locate in neighborhood and community commercial centers. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The current proposal is part of a series of five(5)proposed rezones of privately held properties by the City of Renton. These rezones would change the Public Use(P-1) zoning designation on the subject properties to zoning-already in the area that allows many of the uses found on the five properties. The current five P- 1 rezones are part of a series of approximately fifty (50) that will be necessary to assimilate out the P-1 Zone. This consolidation of the City's zoning is based in part upon an extensive staff report that was prepared in November,'1993 the findings of which are summarized in staffs May 4, 1994, Staff Report to the Planning and Development.Committee on the issue of the relevance of the Public Use Zone, given Renton's new zoning codes, and whether or not this left-over zone should be assimilated into the City's other zones. In June, 1994, the City Council's Planning and Development Committee (see Exhibit `B') directed the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to proceed with the assimilation of the P-1 Zone into other zones that had been adopted in June, 1993 and which accommodated most, if not all of the uses typically allowed in the P-1 Zone. As noted above, this recommendation was based upon a fairly extensive staff report on the Public Use Zone that was prepared in November, 1993. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ' Pursuant to the city of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA.(RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), on November 12, 1996, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-significance for these five,proposed rezones, including this one. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC CONDITIONS Because no mitigation measures were imposed on this non-project action, there were no ERC conditions • that the applicant was required to comply with., DRBRAIN.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone LUA-96-126,ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 3, 1996 Page 4 of 5 4. - STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Because this rezone is a non-project action under SEPA as well as a part of a package of City sponsored P-1 rezones,comments from other reviewers were not solicited. S. CONSISTENCY WITH REZONE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-8-14.0 "In the case where a change of the zone classification of property is recommend, at least one of the following circumstances shall be found to apply:" GENERAL CRITERIA: a) Previously Not Considered Zoning Reclassification That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area . . zoning; or The subject site was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area rezoning in either June, 1993 since it was understood that Staff were studying the P-1 Zone and were preparing recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council on whether this special purpose zone should be retained, or, assimilated into the City's other new zoning classifications. Single-family areas abut the five'private rezone sites to the north,east,and west and were rezoned in June, 1993 to the R- 8 (Single-family)Zone. The subject'site was not included in these rezones because the City was waiting for the Council's resolution as to how the Public Use Zone would be handled. In June of 1994, the Council directed staff to proceed with the assimilation of the P-1 Zone into the city's other new zones.. b) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Its Elements and Policies That the property.is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate; or The subject site has been determined to be potentially classified for the proposed Commercial Office Zone based upon the fact that it is designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Map as Center Institution. Objective LU-V states that such areas are to be provided to assure adequate land and infrastructure for the expansion offacilities to serve post secondary educational and health care needs of the area and protect adjacent uses from impacts of these more intensive uses. Amendments to the Commercial Office Zone are currently under consideration. If approved these would allow both medical institutions and convalescent • centers/nursing'homes and retirement residences as permitted uses in this zone. Medical and dental offices, currently allowed in this zone,would continue to be allowed. Accessory uses including electrical •generation plants for medical institutions would also be allowed. Provisions requiring limited exterior signage for retail and service establishments would no longer apply. Because of the high number of offices/clinics in the subject area as well as on Valley Medical Center's north campus it was felt that the CO Zone,with the proposed amendments,would be the most appropriate of Renton's existing zones for this area. Also,there are areas along Talbot Road S. south of S. Carr Road that are currently zoned'Commercial Office. • DRBRA1N.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone LUA-96-126,ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 3, 1996 Page 5 of 5 c) Timeliness of Proposed Rezone That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject.property, ' authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. The proposed rezone is timely because in June, 1995,the City adopted new zoning provisions to protect the public trust that implemented Public Facilities Policies LU-229, LU-230, and LU-231. These provisions which ensure early notification for nearby residents and property owners whenever there is a change of use, ownership, or major tenancy of any publicly owned property allowed the City to move ahead with its P-1 rezones and their assimilation to other zones.. H. RECOMMENDATION: . Staff recommend approval of the Springbrook Associates rezone, File No. LUA-96-128, ECF, R, (without a public use"P"suffix attached, in this case because this is a privately held parcel),for the following reasons: 1. The rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for this parcel, 2. The rezone is consistent with City policies that encourage the location and siting of smaller scale health care facilities such as clinics, practitioner's offices, convalescent centers, and similar uses. in centers rather than being geographically dispersed throughout the city. In this case, because of the intensity of some of these smaller-scale health care facilities it is proposed that they remain in the Center Institution center, and be zoned consistent with other commercial office uses,including clinics in the area. 3. The rezone is consistent with the proposed rezones of abutting privately held Public Use zoned properties to the Commercial Office Zone. Four other privately held P-1 zoned properties are also proposed to be rezoned to the CO Zone. This is important because the minimum lot size in this zone is 25,000 square feet,and some of these lots may have to be consolidated to achieve full development potential. 4: The subject rezone is a non-project action under SEPA and is a legislative act which of and by itself will not result in new development although will provide the potential for more intense uses than allowed in the existing P-1 Zone since the CO Zone has the potential of allowing twenty(20) story buildings because this zone allows building heights of up to 250 feet for developments on sites larger than 25,000 square feet. Note: The applicant was not required to comply with any mitigation measures since the Environmental Review Committee issued a straight Determination of Non-significance for these proposed rezones when it considered them on November 12, 1996. • DRBRAIN.DOC/ • .• ,--- . . - - • a •. . - • • - .., L. v ..; 4 .0 i:•I ip l':••‘ . . • . - • • • - -'./.10:4';(-Y ••Z't. 47 II V tiS 43 4cr CO 0 12-- 4 t) z3.. ,i"- • 161 0 • • • .1 • '5.5- le •• ifie Az°.1 ‘ to. - :'--z.-•:-.. -K.,,,.. .• ./Is.ei,...-,•,•,:-.7*..* • .i.cp6‘• 4' .v-e ,...r 0 A ..y3 •,..,:;'1,, 9 • .. - : • v •-€...,--., 54.--.---....-1,-- : E - . • .. ..• e b,,„0401/.0.1. .4,..;,..1..„_., 'i'....s.'cr--,.....1...',. .4:4/2 • ...:_•:.-. .- ••°:.;e ..,4. ''' '4 .• - i 3- - •.. •.,(0. r . ... .0"c-- I - •• 4- ,. I, d•1 r . • .0 .. ••I• •-•-••• -br:. • .... .•dz1.3.....-6'...., 2*-Ai. 1 .-?...,-..•• . • •4,‘,.-.••-0 ev•• C) :ill • ....----, -d 1?. I• • •V7*7'• • . - .9• . 1.2 . S .ill :••": 7* *- •• .°-"•,-, •---a.. • . - - .7 i ' . •, ,1,....-t•-LT- li "te 4 IR- .4.-N % VI •k ...., 6-.7:H i.-- -• • -,-.--Nr ST01 .•.3- :. - .. . 3 4 .C2' 1'1': a..,=, zr.0.• g 4. CO, .a.. 655°(2 4; V 4A NI ; 1.2814 i 78,0,- - N? •`-'-•-•-„ 26 A.- .'1'% • " 'b • 0 N. • C) .. • •(:)%ot , AC. 5- 4 --, o' t;• • . ..). gr,) --,-....• • 4 ,:x A ....._ :c VD, ... C) k4 _Z____:.....f• -- . ..„ , • A t . • • • A 4‘..... .__ "•••96. • ••ib Z • A;4 '--1.,6. ''''. • ' .4••• . 0 7•5• .••:..9Z. • CeP k 'TZ 4. 7.5-• ; ' '. " . . „...• - 6L0k ..••••,., IN it 1,:®.7 fV.•C‘ ki LII • --...,,,, -• - 9 45 - o . . . . St N o .e4- e o g . ci • \ 4 ..".• . g Z k; 1\ tb / ‘e, Oi .01 i6° ' /6.. t‘i i o Za"/ ".. I . , cp 1 ir ° h V.,0 ,. c 7,..,6. . 4. 0 0,10 S 41 ' • 0 • . '4't(-4'••:•:.,,-, .., 7.6- .0,0 k• . ------- : : - • • ' 7'.S' , . 0 • s • 7.---1----•--:. .---. Aa v) . . •1•14....,e --- • --....._,.... _ zo.; ‘ 0 . ' . .. / 1 x x. • ' c`0' . * 4 . ' • , ' . Ui . V r., 1.4r i • k . lop, .; •- i,; .Li "• S.? s ' . ,3 0 • qi 8 • 4. • • • . f.G. • * P''‘ 0•610P . 2 OP 7 e, , ..7.: ... z/7. ...4 ,,,,I, -g: k_, ke\C•ng , S4 --• iS 1..i.•i 0 v.".- Z? ../.1.•-‘,,,, ."‘"Zr.33 , .11 CIL• .. 'f.,_-1 ,6\0'"" .il•\''‘' 00 V ' I•1 t.s,2_2_ Ai...„,,,..„ ,..„ 0) I ,e, lz•:.9..L------4-7A•.:44. -.-----------..------....... " l' S.• .1 Xs+III -------.Z1 // °‘- • ' . . - • . . .9.c.,-1 • .r..17 - " TA;'.• • 4;13 -- - Z1 0 9.2• a h t‘• .• I , .. .., . el • til*f ;) C.) . I , Z-) .1 , ‘...,-„.. . • : N 0111 1 1 , 'CO•• • .,,,.0,...,w N. /0.f ' ' 4 • O •••.7G./a , ..., 4• . i• 4 ke -..., ...A_ II' .-..„,.. 1. • . -.-....i.NN&ty 0 \ '9 13-78- 781214901$ . . _. K * . 4 t du . - 41 • N. J -_____c,.„...4 37 II 'lkj) • 0 N . ----------- • i • .. '7 I/'9 . . .,• A 4• -I ' ea V . . eo.c.. .-. .. ,..,.., PCL C • ' .1 •- •..41 ' oa5. . . - . • cri ): PCL. A • . . 000 . A.` „Ac• !. 1''' a" t'' f'" , . • . ,e 0 o-c), :7 , 3, • 6E:4 -3 0- -5 4 I ,,o- o. . • . I. t i1/4 t -: A r..,2;2././7 Z.* .7. • aal..0.T I. ....0 0..0.3..00 S. .300 .erdi..ao• 1 . 904.-41- ...P't F 2 CX2 . ---- - ' /00 LIE:4_ 31-23 4 -6 • IX . 8 . i.-------r ir' ler) . . loo • 14-'•C) f• • . • •-ii ...• ' • .•11 • ,. i' 14 ' .- el?-:•6:-9•7:321.-0" ----''- 7.-et, ' • it , • • , • 4.1 , cl • • 1 • • let PCL. B .., , c 1' Pc": • .o 1 o \I 79., 8.:.5. . 0 ' p A itJ A/69.0.3-0.5 k/ ..:* _346.4e.. W t, 1 6.'' - 29 3C ------- 30 ...,,, ,,-• 2, I . ' . . • , • • ' 70 85 . • 4- . • ., k. t S 17 7 • If. tr‘ se5.-<- --Ig.d Ri % . /off-9e 7 ' • / t',;i . 6 i.a. 8,,,,-.1.,--• Ni.>.,c 1 ' i I °'..0. . EXHIBIT • • EXHIBIT E3 r- g E 10 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE ' COMMITTEE REPORT (JUNE 6, 1994) • PUBLIC USE ZONE REVISIONS (Referred 5/24/94) The Committee recommends that staff proceed with the assimilation of the P-1 Zone into existing zones. The Committee also recommends that staff continue to work with all interested parties to address concerns of the Planning Commission and the Planning and Development Committee related to preserving the public trust and revising the development standards related to these uses. This action will allow staff to proceed in a timely manner with amendments to the Comprehensive Plan related to these public uses. The Committee will continue to work with staff on the remaining issues and report back to City Council prior to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. • The Committee recommends City Council concur in this report. • cut. • • KgC-ek,-NI bAibiALI • Kathy Keg er-Wheeler,.Chair Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair • R dy Corman, em er • • •.• 1 _ . EXHIBIT 'C' , CC5 • 1 • 1 . Q.) • 11 111 . . ______,_______! A-4 1?-15 -..s, a ,..., . ,. - . 4 . animmi i!. r-0 , .> • .0 aralriN Q.) • . • ' • 0,5 as ,...., ,,,, a...re, . th St, IF . - I?-- ' - . ' I , .--- pi IFP-I . ifwin 0 R-s • • ' So 0) f • . - .; f.,..: I . Y ' S: 4i4Ir . F,.. / • . • `-tc....) . 0 . 17. 7th : A\T - . SE .. 1 Y 0" LONG RANGE PLANNNG _ - 4ct...1141* R. MacOn.to,' D. Visneski . A` 7 November W96 1cl) LANDUSE ACTION FILE #96—.126 REZONES FILE #PR-14 FROM P-1 TO CO 0 300 600 REZONE SITE CITY LIMITS . 1 :3600 • . • :•:• ,v rw:•+ .+ 'v. :. ii.. { ...v m•vti':^:'+.r+F?4i}}T' '4'. •:v ..4.•vr x}r}5 r};:{{$ ::.: :{$'S$iif$'}vwi'}}F:>:C'':5 i5�rt;:i;}:}•:i:{:$j;:5t::}:{$$:ivJ:r:{:•?t?55r$•{?{.i{}}i.. :ti»i$: }i4'\+•rP}:{.,v::'i:}55: -:.?:::.x•:?:r•:::n .rrr...:... r. tiPtig:41*. } . :. { :.....,.. .,v:. .{nv4.:, t{ L S : 3 {': .}.v�+ r.} : :r:}•r•: .L•., x t \ ,y+,.. .ry.2 iti}`{:5$i':v,'::.......rr.{ . 5� {ts3.. .zt},:.�•k5+:n ti •:.a ?kiS�. •.+yt. Y{ 'kYt.:i+:#'.f,. ^�5.,ra.. t:•:••t•,•}: .,?•.,+:.rr r.r+::^}:-:.<.•:::n,3. .n$G+4n,..:,r,..,:::,•v•. r+}a, r..4. 4:n.,•,�x•n• • ...:.'L. n . .., - ,f`.,r..{+•+ a.\ .\r..�t,„{...n ...•. rC .. .M:. !,2•':• a. •T:ur::n..z .};{.:..:.>T:.x•+}:: r4Y..a,, .,r4' :r bF'4t'. n.,:.4'C�r.a a`.7..,,.4:rr.4n#,�!}.}2,C}}•. r•: , ,.T.L, ,� :r.44n�r....r r.r..,.,rY:s+::A•v::4::::'4'^ ..{ �ii:±{4.:{•::{...x•:.•k•, ...}. :{•fi..., .s...,,.:n•::#r.�r}:s'.r{:{}.,?:.. .r:? {4•,4+ti•::}a,$,.r��;4.�ynt�... 'i}T • 5y {,.ti }{?.,L},....u.42} .+.:q,;T•r yt.. '•i{}. f 4.$-^..t{5{•..•,•.};.},y:•;•4vr.,, .¢ 4{3.}:Y{?:5$:?n• Y' } ,•.: •::. •$::iY�sf'k;: .:}}L4�j!!�� ...:.. }:' }}: r r'•'ti + .i;}}.V.�.}k.J4 . ...... '.. ...•r,} :: ::} .. �"w!.ri .. ":4}..;. } .. r: �j{AS,yn�.'::: {•' ". ... ,c3#:, :4.:}{ ..Ln:'n:% 7•r�iMltM� 4 ::.l�f• •..•n:�.••TM:• v�t.• T1!':+iT 4�W. �1MC:• 4: :•. .:!Y*: :{ � :1•.•lT} •71* .,}•, •:.+..:{ � � it . .+. . , ...:..n �.... .. ..,. �`.,r. {..... .....�. .,�., ... ....�.... n ..: .5....f............r...... ... r.+. . ��. :}A:.n }r••. r w vx..{.;..?:•.. .. .v....:r.,.,};+.v-. •:F•::•.v:vT•:.rr , .... r ,.. ... ..: x , .. vv...... ..vv+:r,..•:•.w:rv,�..:.w:v•]j.rr......t..r......:......,.nt r:.:.. .,• .,. fr,,. ,. ... r. ..4 r ..t ,• ..n.,5: :••. ?r.... .,n ..., r. ,.�•4{::$$:.y.; •:.f:.i••?••'.t.:•:{.?•4.. ;•{.r•:+:.A.•::a+••r+••}•'t•:..,. ... ..... n.n.,..r:.. ..« rr.n r r:.. ir.,.:....: r.r.,. ,4^N S. .r. .. .. .. .'tr. ac : .. .i: ,.cA'`:. } :.r...d:r.. '�rf :�rt. •+.u,...r...n .:d..•..r...0 r.t.+.. .::. ...r ,..,./<. ....�>.k+{...,#...:.. }n r.2{:..r 4' f +t: fir.', .> , .i:+a .r,:tY. ,S,:•, .♦..rr .r •.t, .::... •./ ••:4i?}:•r•:+ ::}ri$.;::i:•<:...:.:,4;,... r;�.;�{;.}}:>^.{„. .•,u.,•.r:..: r 4..{fir �$.+94..{§+'., x,•k .F�..\Snr,rr.; `•� ti.#...c;�£#2.:L:, .3.:...{k::{.iin ' §.. .:.r:N:+?.. ,.,L•..Tr. ••t.. .,.L. spa,..}i�•::•:f::.:{,::.:+:+•r.•r.... ••.a•:$:'�.+aa nn,4}�'•���i,•f{�'r•F$:• t.,r.,•:3:....... .nr ,n.;,. .4 rfi -+'2• :! ! :r'S.!}}{r:::•?:• .....r.:r.. J.r.n...:.... ,.r.....y.{.n :e .L•r :•,.. .... r :. -,. , ^• •r •:,• : ..k •.Sr :•,} ..4r.•••r••r;+}:'#a:r..:+.•i:•?••::::+4$:{::5:,t}${.{;Y�S}Fovt$+i:•r:::::..x:n.....:....n:rn........ . .. . . .{ ,t .r.r.•.{ $ .. , ., ,-r. .{Y}r.{ .r, . '4+. .. , 4,(� +rq :s:u•;cr:-:. •4n.. :�55r 'A.r•::r4: : n:4 : Mop"+..T.... ..3. .}.r....___— _ ........r. ...r:..:r............,,: ......,..•,. .n..s,. u..,..:.,r.,,, ,r. :.,• .p,)y .. .. .} �}!�� ,fir.; •.. .. ...Y}4}'�+:t$i�?'a.. �,,5� r7 ••n , .r.}r... }.::•.•r, {:..;} ..{{.:,•:::::.... / ..} . r..r.:.: .%.. ..}:., .Y.. � :v f' # +S`�i. A.h. e..�i i�•.•\•.::•.:•rr '\,: {4;Y:;$.$•:.r.r:.: tti:r Y:v`:}•t:{v.+ u'{.+,r}r ...r.... ... fi......{:... ....n.a K , :, .. :a•,'y. ..z, . .. ,.,4•...t, :.. ....•:+•:T:'Str}•. ,v-r:{;•:{nr.:}n•;r:•: 4•..r.: •}r.•.: .,r..,{ ..A.r 4..:::•i+ ........:.:.{f...,.a.....,....,..rf., ....., :.# ....... ... n.r.,..., .n �.'. , n #r ..,}c r.. .. , �.+. }.. ,r .r.n.f.. l• r< i`9..}:..{,r.....:.: `.i�'fr• 7.J% :..4x:•T••t•:•3:{;, ,Y.. mot.............,.....r........... ..3..... ::. ,. .....,.4..,r a.t..... ,x. z. {{�r<..'�:. ,�#.5:,r ,d. ti ,4:•r•:•sa•,a.. ,2r...:K.......s•�Y• ,.n.......:...:......n}:f`...„a .•..{'''... t w3 .. .tF}. .. , .. ., fY+rir.•:'x,t+r,:r}n'•nc<`• ;$4't;%•r,:;},•:•:}..r.#....,+r•:::�`•Y.+r.. .{.......,k.....r.,..............:..... .... .:.:...:......t....,z.......T .. . .. .,. ....,C� r! 4 a::. •.{•:• ;;,,,,:.;.,.,,,r. .,<.,r, r+ti} :{2.,{:$..t rr.�.vi:{: x�rr... .Y...r.}}' ..C...,•r:. r : ..r.......}./....n.... .r.r......Cr. ... ...<. v{,,.,...::......},...;,.{.vv•::.•3r:+:t#:}.:t � .r� .3/.n.,. �.{, ���II.K\T}. .... .. S.?'�. f...,{r. �`.:�..a... :}.... .2...,•:,+... :fG::f•::•:,{.:.C•:.. ..{...r ..:.........n..........A............vn r. ... a .. .. ......};n .v..... n \ at'`. .:... ?v .v .......T.{,... } f. :.4:•{.. vv$. n`{r..�{:.: {y'$::{•/n...n:•! { ....,............ .....,.\...,.. ...,..\..r2.r.,. ... zQ .: k .T r� :..,,....,. .... #�.:. „ .. ...: ,•.,�•n• +:.?„S•: •kC.:• t .,3.t4�:•}...T.�.. o':§Xi$: t{•m:n:•?,r,•r::-....r.,..{.. :,r vx,:+'4SS: .....,..n:.v.n...vp... .. ....,�..... .. .v....r4r.Y....>....:....n. ...,...,.,a Y : ...v .J .. ...x A r rf-.4 .'T•'4.:...,,. . .5.. .}.n.... .. ..�. .s ..i ..., ....:.... -r}'$S•$.J.. ::•:, .:£-r.+:: ;:r4,•}:+:L.,•`... ';:{}}n.. :r:}�r.•a{•::::!.::•3s:r:...,........:.....r... {. .,... #•....... .r. .. r.. ...t� :�:r. 2.4.r...,....,.,.:. ,x,.........fCr.,.rr r .v. 4. :f.,.. •r:}rr•::,.:::+n•:.. �5fr } {.,{... ........ ...........,..,...>.......4..,�:....,T.ra..r...r..,, . �.}3.a n,{,..fi...tQt:... 4.. ... fi ..#.#7F... .>f�..',3......r .. .r. .. ..?... : t. .:S�c.. .,ti:r::•r:+.:+?•$:t•?'•:4.•.:..z............. ..:,......r......,.............:..<.. .k....r...r. .....,.....,......2,..r�T. : . � .. ..:... :.r ..:.:.:....:..,.}....::::•:r:rt::•r+vx;•$};;::.•::..,... :{t?::•:,r..... ..}... ..h...v.v......?.rt.> .^.h.t.... .. .!...r.....r.tv.,..:. :. � }`.+'. va......:.v..../..n......n.4..A...T.......:.}.$.. .v .. n.............. ..r..................:...,........... )....n.?r.......,...r...,,. .. .,•._...,, r.?.....n....,n..,.....:.. .,....::r.}>..1.{?...t+r.......r..r.....................n.......... ....r......,,d:r.3 .}}.n..........:.r...:..:.,6.........,..... ../.::::•.v?::vn{v:{. .r:h•{{4+;•:r..... ................}...r................:.............r..................:...rn.....n...nr.- ....$r:.::�.. £�1� � ,.....:...............v..C..�................ .. S. .n........n.. ..«..rn. ...........,v;..y.;........:..:..�,.y..........n.;:.....�...n..�.................n.;.n.:..... .......:>......,_ ...........r......nv....,_�.... .._ .... n.......n.............n.......... .:..F....f.........5.:..L.....}....r.�....t::.v.}•.}•: _ ......r. ... _. Y�:'{'i�:•:t}i55$$:�f:•:J:{+<t} irf55f:v�$:tiv'�ti:ti�5:•:$fi 5fr•:?'�.: $.''{'�:V$'r'�Yiti<�$:>riSi�}$$5f:r''v'S4$$5:>:5$i$'i'4:4$fi:Cf:•:•:�$f:Jfif$:4v , :.:::::::.v::::;::;:.v:::;:.v;:::::,v:v:.+rrr:??•:4r:w::•rrr}}}:•}?'::::::::•r:{v:;.....r}::•?::v:r.w:.::::w....y........ ; v::?•v4:x: :.{.,•:5;?�?#f$:�ii5{$::�5t55$f:t�$:;..::Si$5:%•+.<�$$:}:$i::i$;.+..}....r.:........... :•:{•}r:{:n••}:{4:•rr:?vv: +r::{n•+•>rr't:•?:+ti+•$:i��::.v: ::::::::•::::.v::::::::::::.::.::.:.:.:..:::.v:::::::::•v4vv:;;:•w:+4:.:v.v:n4}•4:4:'v:4:•............. ..... ...v............:S•:::. .x,....n...r.........m::.w.v:$'w::$:.4r •:{•T:{•:, .............................................................. .. : .. ..,.,..: ...r.....z...,........,.{.. , ....5...�...,:.... .. .\.. .. ...:t?. ;{?.}}:•}:.}:::istr}:'+.;:•:;•:•}:?4:•rr:;rrirt}:;::;;;%$>:;$%:<:$$•.'•::�•::%;�$$i$$i:•:•::'.+•;:{.i?ri:•rx•i:•i..,....................... ..f.....•ir$:�i:{i:;::$: n......... ....... ... .. .... .. .. .� .:::•:•.• .:$j$?$:•:'{'+.{::::;:i;:Sid:ti#{vi:•i:+�`•:2::titii:,i•::ti?:t`•ISi�$:i£�:+5$$ir•$$::?:;:$•:f?f:$5:...:.. ...:...:�.,.;.;.. ...:nv•;�w:.vn:•::•.w.,., n\...r•r....:•:xTr.•?:�:::::4.+.{..::::.:w:•v:a:4::••y,^.v.:v:x}.:\••v:v v:: :: :> c.. s . ...... . O.. ...r............:..........:::4.:.::...:..:: ............{..,........n........::.. v:.......:r?....,..... .. .... ..... ................ .. r. .........,...... ........................... ... ........... ..:r.:}:4i i:•i?:•iir:•r:•i:•`.•ix•>ir•:;•}:.}:tt•s'::?}:::.�r:.,•::•::•::::::.. Government buildings such as schools, hospitals, libraries; Offices: administrative/headquarters; professional; Business Park and Ride lots; Municipal utility (facilities; Municipal Serivces; general; Business and professional schools,- Airports; etc. business services; existing neighborhood, community, and regional parks, trails, and open spaces; existing public and private elementary and secondary schools/portables existing as of June 7, 1993(site plan review for expansions less than 10%); theaters; utilities, small; existing use designations(see • code for complete explanation 43-31-16.h) STREET SETBACKS STREET SETBACKS Arterial (major/secondary) 30 feet Street Setback front 15 feet Arterial Collector 25 feet Street Setback 25 feet or less(15-30).feet Moderate Density Residential 20 feet 25-80 feet (15-25) feet All others 20 feet over 80 feet (30-50) feet Rear/Side none required • RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS(from abutting lots designated residential) RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS(from abutting lots designated residential) Low Density Residential 50 feet Not Applicable • Moderate Density Residential 20 feet MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT Public Buildings 50 feet* General 250 feet,(bonuses up to 50 feet exist Public and Private Utilities 20 feet for additional amenities) Residential Adjacency 20 feet over residential max. tri MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE . MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE No limit other than established by yards. 65% of the total lot area . 75% if parking is provided within the building * 75 feet permitted subject to specified provisions,such as increased setbacks, sloped roofs,etc. EXHIBIT 'C' \ \ -g 1 . (10" kik il ,L, a ,_, Q) ril 4 • R- tz s Q) jrnv. „moor ,, ocy ■ g I .- ,,,„... �ini th st 1117-1 Eitig i f?-6 17-I lei IN R-s I - fr_ . , 141 . .. -11 Cl' A _ , i (70 1 1, 177th .. Av . Sh1 I I AS 0 00 0 • , LONG RANGE PLANNING +•+ DonErickson LANDUSE , ACTION FILE #96- 126 R. " COb D. �""° ' REZONES FILE #PR-14 F •' 7 November 1996 0 300 600 FROM P- 1 TO CO l , - REZONE SITE 1 :3 6 0 0 CITY LIMITS • . EXHIBIT • PR-14' EXHIBIT"A" BRAIN PROPERTY • REZONE FROM PUBLIC USE(P-1) TO COMMERCIAL OFFICE(CO) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel A of Valley.General Hospital - Dr. Brain Short Plat, City of Renton Short Plat No. 78-213, Recorded under King County Recording No. 7812149018,Records of King County,Washington. All situate in the Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County,Washington. TOGETHER WITH the north 85 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 31, Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., King County,Washington,lying westerly of the county road (Talbot Road South, Springbrook Road, 96th Ave. S.) and easterly of a line lying 300 feet westerly of,, as measured along the north line of said subdivision,the westerly right-of-way line of said county road. • • • BRAIN.DOC\ R ;EIVED Gi 2 a 5.e, 3 5.0/ . FEB 041997 CITY iF RENTON .u. Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor RENTON CITY MMUNetl Fred J.Kaufman January 13, 19,0 7 Mr. Mike Kattermann Planning/Technical Services Director City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 • Re: Reconsideration of Brain Rezone(LUA-96-126,R) and D&R Enterprises Rezone (LUA-96-130-R) Dear Mr. Kattermann: Staff, which had initiated the proposed rezones noted above, has requested that both recommendations be reconsidered in light of new information. For the reasons noted below, those recommendations will be altered to recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed zoning. The Brain property is located at 3901 Talbot Road South. Single family uses are located directly east of the site across Talbot Road South. The D&R Enterprise property is located at-3731 Talbot Road South. Like the companion Brain site, single family uses are located across Talbot Road to the east. In both cases, the single family properties are zoned R-8, or the equivalent in King County and the Comprehensive Plan designates the sites for single family uses., As noted by staff in its request,the CO zone limits structures in the CO zone that are adjacent to • single family uses to 20 feet over the height permitted in the adjacent residential zone. Therefore,both of the subject properties would be limited.to a 50 foot height. Section 4-31-16D4b(2) specifies: When a building is adjacent to a lot designated as residential on the City Comprehensive Plan, the building may exceed the height allowed in the adjacent residential zone by a maximum of twenty feet(20'). Section 4-31-2, "Definitions" defines "adjacent" as: ADJACENT: Lots located across a street, railroad or right of way, except limited access roads. At the public hearing staff noted that they traditionally have interpreted "adjacent" as meaning immediately abutting and that an intervening street meant properties were not adjacent. That has '10r) 11 Av.enil:' Conti] - Renton. Washington 92055 - (2i)6)235-2593 now been corrected and therefore, the recommendations on these two properties will be modified. The recommendations of staff that the properties be reclassified to CO is appropriate and that recommendation will be made to the City Council. At the same time, there are still some areas where the uses surrounding the proposed CO zones would be adversely affected by structures that may approach or even exceed 250 feet in height. Therefore, this office believes the City Council might consider revisiting the CO Zoning Districts and the height limitations permitted in those areas. Even if the CO zone is not adjacent to a residential district, either directly or as defined by Code, there could be impacts that need to addressed, and as noted in the recommendations on these two matters as well as the other three nearby sites, site plan review and SEPA may not provide adequate assurances that impacts can be averted. The following discussion is extracted from the prior decisions. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area as suitable for Center Institution but appears to designate property east, north and even west of these sites for single family uses. The Center Institution designation in the Comprehensive Plan does not necessarily require CO zoning but apparently the CO zone comes the closest to permitting the uses proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. At the same time Policy LU-143 suggests small-scale.health care facilities in neighborhoods. It is clear that the possible 250 foot height permitted in the CO zone could introduce buildings that are completely out of scale with the nearby single family zones. The fact is that under the right lot layout,a narrow tier of CO or other non-residential zoning could eliminate.,the height limitation. That seems inappropriate although that scenario is apparently not present in this case. As noted in the original decisions forr some of the adjacent parcels, the site plan ordinance has been more recently limited to guiding development rather than conditioning it or significantly scaling back the intensityof development. It would be inappropriate to rely on either site plan review'or even SEPA after generally vesting certain rights.in property,im,this casea height limits, if 250 feet tall can be called limits. Neither SEPA',nor the site plan review process are intended to ultimately control neighborhood:character: That is the overriding purpose of the Zoning Code. The zoning requested at this juncture would permit 250 foot tall structures on property located very close to single family zones in which 35 foot tall structures predominate. That would be inappropriate. Neither the roads that abut these sites nor narrow intervening lots would provide either sufficient setback or buffering to protect the interests of the single family homes west or north of potentially 250 foot tall buildings. Therefore, it seems prudent to review some aspects of the CO ordinance and this office will suggest that the City Council review aspects of the CO zone. As with site plan review and SEPA, it has been shown that the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan cannot be used to lessen the density of plats where the proposed density has been determined to be intrusive and out of character with surrounding uses. Therefore, there should be no mistaken reliance on other polices or regulations when the zoning would permit 250 foot tall buildings. While granting such zoning does not require 250 foot tall buildings and there are no plans for anything that large, approving the requested zoning does vest the right to potentially develop such structures. In this area,that could be inappropriate. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject sites from P-1 to CO. Sincerely, d_ • Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:rnm cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant • Lawrence Warren, City Attorney Gregg Zimmerman • Jim Hanson • CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM • DATE: December 19, 1996 TO: Fred Kaufinan,H •,: Examiner FROM: Mike Kattennal1. . , s'i and Technical Services Director SUBJECT: Clarification of Zoning Terms Abutting and Adjacent In your recent report and recommendation for the Brain Rezone (LUA-96-126,R) and D & R Enterprises Rezone (LUA-96-130,R) you based your decision to recommend denial of these two rezones from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone based upon Mr. Erickson's response at the hearing as to how "adjacent" was interpreted. Mr. Erickson in responding to your question indicated that "adjacent" has traditionally meant that properties had to physically abut. He apparently was not aware that in August of last year, this definition was changed when the City adopted new setback provisions for the City's residential zones. Prior to this date "adjacent" meant.that two properties had to physically abut but under the new definition properties across a street, railroad, or right of way are now also considered to be "adjacent". This change was made to ensure similar front yard setbacks along both sides of a street. Attached is the earlier definition of"attached" that Mr. Erickson referenced followed by the new definition adopted on August 21, 1995 as part of the amendments for residential setbacks. As a result of this new definition both the Brain Rezone and the D & R Enterprises Rezone sites would meet the definition of"adjacent"and,in this case because they are adjacent to lots designated as residential on the City's Comprehensive Plan, future building heights on these two sites would be restricted to heights no more than twenty feet(20')over the height allowed in the adjacent residential • zone. In this case the adjacent residential zone is R-8 with a maximum height of 30 feet so that the maximun permitted height without conditional use approval would be 50 feet, not 250 feet(300 feet with bonus amenities approved by the Hearing Examiner). In light of this new information we request reconsideration of both the Brain and D &R Enterprises rezones. This information may also have a bearing on the Frary and O'brien Rezones which you are currently considering. Thank you. Attachments: 1995, 1996 "Adjacent"zoning definitions. Illustration of current definition"adjacent". dememo.doc December 18, 1996 Paget DEFINITIONS FOR"ACCESSORY" Pre-1995 Zoning Code Amendments to Section 4-31-2: Definitions "A": ADJACENT PROPERTIES: All contiguous properties, with the assumption that railroads and public rights-of-way,except limited access roads, do not exist. Post-August, 1995 Zoning Code Amendments to Section 4-31-2: Definitions "A": • ABUTTING: Lots sharing common property lines. ADJACENT: Lots located across a street,railroad or right of way,except limited access roads. PROPERTY LAZE r I T T I LO rn I LOT 2 k I LOT 3 I rn H:\W W6ODOT MEMO.DOT\bbh �: ' = CITY'. F RENTON - Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman January 30, 1997 Dr. Eugene Brain 7710 Taneum Road W Thorp, WA 98946 Re: Rezone of Brain Property File No. LUA-96-126,R Dear Dr. Brain: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore,this matter is being submitted to the City Clerk this date for transmittal to the City Council for review., You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City'Council: Your will be notified of all action taken by the City Council upon approval of the request.. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:mm • cc: City Clerk Don Erickson, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 le This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: Dept/Div/Board.. HEARING EXAMINER Staff Contact... Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 2593 AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: City sponsored rezone of Brain Property Public Hearing.. from P-1 (Public Use)to CO (Commercial Office)Zone Correspondence.. Location: 3901 Talbot Road South Ordinance XX File No.LUA-96-126,R Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: 1. Hearing Examiner's Report New Business.... 2. Ordinance Study Session... Other RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Hearing Examiner's Recommendation APPROVALS: and adopt ordinance. Legal Dept Finance Dept.... Other FISCAL IMPACT: N/A • Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: In June 1994, City Council directed Planning/Building/Public Works to proceed with assimilation of the P-1 Zone into the other zones adopted in June 1993. The other zones do accommodate most, if not all of the uses that were typically allowed in the P-1 zone. The Hearing Examiner recommended that the subject site not be reclassified as CO zone in his report dated December 17, 1996. Upon reconsideration dated January 13, 1997,he recommended approval of the City- sponsored rezone. No appeals were received during the appeal period which ended January 27, 1997. Neither the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)nor Hearing Examiner imposed conditions on this rezone. The Examiner recommends that City Council approve reclassification of the subject property from P-1 to CO. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve. 4 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM P-1 (PUBLIC USE) TO CO (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) (BRAIN REZONE; FILE NO. LUA-96-126, R) . WHEREAS, under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building' Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the ° City of Renton, " as amended, and maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as P-i' (Public Use) ; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone► classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about December 3 , 1996, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner, and said zoning request having been • recommended, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ' CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : 1 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to CO (Commercial Office)- as hereinbelow specified, subject to the findings, conclusions, and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated January 13, 1997-; the Development Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property, approximately 1.32 acres, is located at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus', on the west side of Talbot Road South, at 3901 Talbot Road South. ) SECTION- II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 1997 . • Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this -day of , 1997 . Jesse Tanner, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 637 : 1/28/97 :as . 2 71 CITY ,F RENTON `$p Hearing Examiner • Fred J.Kaufman Jesse Tanner,Mayor January 13, °9( . Mr. Mike Kattermann Planning/Technical Services Director City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 • Re: Reconsideration of Brain Rezone(LUA-96-126,R) and D&R Enterprises Rezone (LUA-96-130-R) Dear Mr. Kattermann: Staff,which had initiated the proposed-rezones noted above,has requested that both •recommendations be reconsidered in light of new information. For the reasons noted below, those recommendations will be altered to`,recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed zoning. The Brain property is located at 3901 Talbot Read South. Single family uses are located directly east of the site across Talbot Road South., • -The D&R Enterprise propertyis located'at373'fTalbot Road South: .Like the-companion Brain - site, single family uses are=located across`Talbot Road to the east. ' ``' ' In both eases;the single family properties are zoned:R-8,or`the:equivalent in King County and ?: : :. the Comprehensive Plan designates.the sites.for single family uses:9": _ As noted-by staff in its reuest,the CO zone limitsstructures m the'_CO zonethat are adjacent:to :;',.;,:. , Y request, .:fi. .. single.family uses to.20:feet.over:the�height.permitted°in the'adj acent:residential zone. Therefore,both of the subject properties would be limited to a 50 foot height :. Section 4-31-16D4b(2) specifies: ' • When a building is'adjacent to a lot designated as residential on the City Comprehensive Plan, the building may exceed the height allowed in the adjacent residential zone by a • maximum of twenty feet(20'). Section 4-31-2, "Definitions" defines "adjacent" as: ADJACENT: Lots located across a street, railroad or right of way, except limited access roads. - • At the public hearing staff noted that they traditionally have interpreted "adjacent" as meaning • immediately abutting and that an intervening street meant properties were not adjacent. That has 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 now been corrected and therefore, the recommendations on these two properties will be modified. The recommendations of staff that the properties be reclassified to CO is appropriate and that recommendation will be made to the City Council. • At the same time, there are still some areas where the uses surrounding the proposed CO zones would be adversely affected by structures that may approach or even exceed 250 feet in height. Therefore, this office believes the City Council might consider revisiting the CO Zoning Districts and the height limitations permitted in those areas. Even if the CO zone is not adjacent to a residential district, either directly or as defined by Code,there could be impacts that need to addressed, and as noted in the recommendations on these two matters as well as the other three ,. .- nearby sites,site plan review and SEPA may not provide adequate assurances that impacts can be averted. The following discussion is extracted from the prior decisions. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area as suitable for Center Institution but appears to designate property east,north and even west of these sites for single family uses. The Center Institution designation in the Comprehensive Plan does not necessarily require CO zoning but,apparently'the CO zone comes the closest - 4 to permitting the uses propdsed'in the Comprehensive:Plan. •At the same time Policy LU-143 suggests small-'scale health care facilities'in neighborhoods. - It is clear that the possible 250 foot height permitted.in°the.CO zone could introduce buildings that are completely out-of scale with the nearby single family zones. The fact is that under the_right:lot layout,:a narrow tier:of co.or other non-residential zoning could'eliminate the:height limitation. That seems. • inappropriate`although,tl"iat+scenario'is~apparently not.present iu this case: As . ; noted in the original decisions for some of the;adjacent parcels'the site plan ordinance has been more recently-limited to guiding development rather than :conditioning it orrsigmficantly scaling back the intensity:=of development. It would"be inappropriate,.`to rely:On either site:plan reviewl or even.SEPA.after_ enerall vestingQ;certain rights•iri:property m this case,Height limits,if 250 feet s: : , . ,-;;; tall,can be called"limits::Nether;SEPA:northe'site plan'review;process are' ntrol'rie g "borhood character: -,That"is"the`overridin,�; ;intended to�.ultiriiatelyco -gh g: • 7purposeof the Zoning Code The zoning requested at this Juncture would;permit._:= < 250 foot:tall-structures on;propertyylocated very;close to;single family Zones",in . • which 35 foot tall structures predominate. That would be inappropriate. , Neither the roads that abut these sites nor narrow intervening lots would provide either sufficient setback or buffering to protect the interests of the single family homes west or north of potentially 250 foot tall buildings. • Therefore, it seems prudent to review some aspects of the CO ordinance and this • office will suggest that the City Council review aspects of the-CO zone: As with site plan review and SEPA, it has been shown that the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan cannot be used to lessen the density of plats where the proposed density has been determined to be intrusive and out of character with surrounding uses. Therefore, there should be no mistaken reliance on other polices or regulations when the zoning would permit 250 foot tall buildings. While granting such zoning does not require 250 foot tall buildings and there are no plans for anything that large, approving the requested zoning does vest the right to potentially develop such structures. In this area, that could be inappropriate. 'RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject sites from P-1 to CO. Sincerely, • Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:mm cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Lawrence Warren, City Attorney,, . _ Gregg Zimmerman; '' Jim Hanson t: 1 • CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM • DATE: . December 19, 1996 TO: Fred Kaufman,H • Examiner FROM: Mike Katte • and Technical Services Director SUBJECT: Clarification of Zoning Terms Abutting and Adjacent In your recent report and recommendation for the Brain Rezone (LUA-96-126,R) and D & R Enterprises Rezone•(LUA-96-130,R) you based your decision to recommend denial of these two rezones from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone based upon Mr. Erickson's response at the hearing as to how "adjacent" was interpreted. Mr. Erickson in responding to your question indicated that "adjacent" has traditionally meant that properties had to physically abut. He apparently was not aware that in August of last year, this definition was changed when the City adopted new setback provisions for the City's residential zones. Prior to this date "adjacent" meant.that two properties had to physically abut but under the new definition properties across a street, railroad, or right of way are now-.also considered to be "adjacent". This change was made to ensure similar front yard setbacks along both sides of a street. Attached is the earlier definition of"attached" that Mr. Erickson referenced followed by the new definition adopted on August 21, 1995 as part of the amendments for residential setbacks. • As a result of this new definition both the Brain Rezone and the D & R Enterprises Rezone sites would meet the definition of"adjacent"and, in this case because they are adjacent to lots designated as residential on the City's Comprehensive Plan, future building heights on these two sites would be restricted to heights no more than twenty feet(20') over the height allowed in the adjacent residential • zone. In this case the adjacent residential zone is R-8 with a maximum height of 30 feet so that the maximun permitted height without conditional use approval would be 50 feet, not 250 feet (300 feet with bonus amenities approved by the Hearing Examiner). In light of this new information we request reconsideration of both the Brain and D &R Enterprises rezones. This information may also have a bearing on the Frary and O'brien Rezones which you are currently considering. Thank you. Attachments: 1995, 1996"Adjacent"zoning definitions. S Illustration of current definition"adjacent" dememo.doc December 18, 1996 Page 2 • DEFINITIONS FOR"ACCESSORY" Pre-1995 Zoning Code Amendments to Section 4-31-2: Definitions "A": ADJACENT PROPERTIES: All contiguous properties, with the assumption that railroads and public rights-of-way, except limited access roads, do not exist. Post-August, 1995 Zoning Code Amendments to Section 4-31-2: Definitions "A": • ABUTTING: Lots sharing common property lines. ADJACENT: Lots located across a street, railroad or right of way,except limited access roads. PROPERTY LINE mo . I � LOT I rn I I LOT 2 I LOT 3 I ••�. �.....�• .I_.. I H:\W W6ODOT\MEMO.DOT\bh HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 17th day of December ,1996, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the,below entitled application or petition. Signature: '..�i)n/► GZ.A+ ✓ 6e' tiSUBSCRI,BED AND SWORN to before me this 'f day of Pece VJ IIUXlV, 1996. C4-721 - Notary Public in an for the State of Washington, residing at ,therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Brain Rezone LUA-96-126,R The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. • December 17, 1996 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: City of Renton Brain Rezone File No.: LUA-96-126,R., LOCATION: 3901 Talbot Road South SUMMARY OF REQUEST: City-initiated rezone of an irregular shaped 1.32 acre site from Public Use(P-1)zone to the Commercial Office(CO)zone. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on November 26, 1996. PUBLIC HEARING: In accordance with Section 4-8-14(C)(2),the Hearing Examiner shall determine if a change of zone classification is advisable, in the public interest,tends to further the preservation and enjoyment of any substantial property rights of the petitioner, is not materially detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other persons located in the vicinity thereof, and is in harmony with the purposes and effect of the Comprehensive Plan. In such event,the Hearing Examiner may recommend that the City Council approve the change of the zone classification. EXHIBITS: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing application,proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.2: Site plan MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the December 3; 1996 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, December 3, 1996,at 9:03 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. City project manager, DONALD ERICKSON,PB/PW Special Projects, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, Washington 98055,presented the staff report. He explained that when the City prepared its Comprehensive Plan in 1993 it deferred making changes to the Public Use(P-1)zone to allow more time to study existing P-1 uses. Originally,the P-1 zone was intended to recognize public ownership and to provide a City of Renton Brain Rezone File No.: LUA-96-126,R December 17, 1996 Page 2 process that would expedite development. The study found that the City's new zoning allows the same public uses in virtually every zone. It was also found that a relatively high percentage of actual public uses are not located in the P-1 zones. For example, City Hall and the Fire Station are in the commercial zone and schools and parks are generally located in single family zones. Staff proposed to the City Council's Planning and Development Committee that the City should either assimilate all public uses in P-1 zones or allow for public uses in all other zones. The City Council chose the latter recommendation since there are adequate provisions in other zones to accommodate public uses and it would be more consistent with the Growth Management Act. Mr. Erickson stated that approval to rezone the subject site from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO) Zone is requested. The subject site is an irregular shaped 1.32 acre parcel located at 3901 Talbot Road South. It is near Valley Medical Hospital and is vacant at this time. There are medical offices and related uses to the south and west,to the east is single family residential, and to the north is a vacant parcel proposed for future retirement residence. In closing,Mr. Erickson recommended approval of this rezone request for the following reasons: (1) the rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for this parcel; (2)the rezone is consistent with City policies that encourage the location and siting of smaller scale health care facilities such as clinics,practitioner's offices, convalescent centers, and similar uses in centers rather than being geographically dispersed throughout the City. In this case,because of the intensity of some of these smaller-scale health care facilities,it is proposed that they remain in the Center Institution center, and be zoned consistent with other commercial office uses, including clinics in the area; (3)that the rezone is consistent with the proposed rezones of abutting privately held Public Use zoned properties to the CO Zone. Four other privately held P-1 zoned properties are also proposed to be rezoned to the CO Zone. This is important because the minimum lot size in this zone is 25,000 square feet, and some of these lots may have to be consolidated to achieve full development potential; (4)the subject rezone is a non-project action under SEPA and is a legislative act which of and by itself will not result in new development although it will provide the potential for more intense uses than allowed in the existing P-1 Zone since the CO Zone has the potential of allowing twenty(20)story buildings because this zone allows building heights of up to 250 feet for developments on sites larger than 25,000 square feet. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:32 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, City of Renton, filed a request to reclassify the subject site from P-1 (Public/Quasi- public)to CO(Commercial Office). 2. The City of Renton filed requests for approval of a series of approximately forty(40)or fifty(50) separate rezones involving a series of separate properties generally but not always owned by public agencies including the City,King County and the Renton School District. The City proposes phasing out its P-1 Zone, a zone that in the past was designed to accommodate public and quasi-public uses. City of Renton - Brain Rezone File No.: LUA-96-126,R December 17, 1996 Page 3 Each of the proposals requests that the new zoning be changed to closely, if not exactly match, surrounding zoning districts and the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 4. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance(DNS)for the subject proposal. 5. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 6. While the background information on the study and proposed abolition of the P-1 zone will be the same for each report, each site will receive separate attention and a separate decision. 7. The P-1 (Public/QuasiPublic)Zone was established in the early 1950's to accommodate governmental facilities as well as certain private uses such as private medical clinics and private hospitals, as well as private schools, museums and the.like that accommodated the public. The permitted uses were expanded over the years to accommodate an even wider range of uses while other zoning districts also broadened their range of respective uses, in effect, duplicating the permitted uses in the P-1 zone. The current zoning categorization generally appears to accommodate most, although not all, of the uses the current P-1 zone permits. The City Council directed staff to make a recommendation as to the continued need for a distinct P-1 zone. A result of that study was presented to the Planning Commission(May 4, 1994 Report). The Planning Commission recommended the assimilation of the P-1 zone. The City Council then directed that individual parcels be assimilated into nearby, compatible zones after appropriate public hearings. The current action is the result of those decisions. 8. The subject site is located at 3901 Talbot Road South. The site is approximately 1.32 acres in size and has a trapezoidal shape, being wider to the rear or west end of the site. 9. The site is at the north edge of the Valley Medical Center complex. Two companion parcels north of the site along Talbot are also being considered for reclassification to CO. In addition,two parcels located north of these parcels on South 37th Street are also being considered for similar rezoning treatment. 10. The City proposes designating the site CO. While the City has attached a special P-suffix designation to any public property which will be reclassified from P-1,that suffix will not be attached to private properties if they are reclassified from P-1 to another designation. Rather,they will be treated like all other private property for development or sale purposes. 11. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development Center Institutional uses, represented in general by uses such as Valley Medical Center and Renton Technical College,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 12. The height limits of the CO permit buildings with a height of up to 250 feet whereas the current P-1 Zone limits building height to generally 50 feet. Commercial Office Height Limits: City of Renton Brain Rezone File No.: LUA-96-126,R December 17, 1996 Page 4 §4-31-16D4. Height: §4-31-16D4a. General: A maximum of two hundred and fifty feet(250'). §4-31-16D4b. Special Height Allowances: §4-31-16D4b(1). Heights may exceed the maximum height by up to fifty feet (50')with bonuses for plazas and other amenities, subject to a Hearing Examiner conditional use permit. §4-31-16D4b(2). When a building is adjacent to a lot designated as residential on the City Comprehensive Plan,the building may exceed the height allowed in the adjacent residential zone by a maximum of twenty feet(20'). 13. Staff has noted that they have interpreted "adjacent" as meaning immediately abutting and that an intervening street removes this limitation. 14. Zoning in the area consists of two predominant zoning districts including the existing P-1 zoning. East, northeast,north and west of an adjoining parcel is R-8(Residential Single Family)Zoning. King County is located east and southeast and its zoning is residential and office related south toward Carr Road. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest,that it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare,and in addition complies with at least one of the criteria found in Section 4-8-14,which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The CO Zone's potential height of 250 feet makes it inappropriate for this site and the reclassification should be denied. 2. The P-1 district and its associated properties were removed from the city-wide reclassification effort to study the basis for the zone itself. This site as well as the other P-1 properties were segregated for special review. The public hearing that preceded this recommendation is the first analysis since that study demonstrated that there is no reason to maintain the P-1 zones. 3. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area as suitable Center Institution but appears to designate property east, north and even west of the site for single family uses. The Center Institution designation in the Comprehensive Plan does not necessarily require CO Zoning, but apparently the CO Zone comes the closest to permitting the uses proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. At the same time Policy LU- 143 suggests small-scale health care facilities in neighborhoods. City of Renton Brain Rezone File No.: LUA-96-126,R December 17, 1996 Page 5 • 4. It is clear that the possible 250 foot height permitted in CO Zone could introduce buildings that are completely out of scale with the nearby single family zones and more importantly the single family uses located across Talbot. While staff has suggested that the site plan review process required for development in this zone and the application of SEPA review could ameliorate those impacts that reliance seems misplaced. The site plan ordinance has been more recently limited to guiding development rather than conditioning it or significantly scaling back the intensity of development. 5. It would be inappropriate to rely on either site plan review or even SEPA after generally vesting certain rights in property, in this case, height limits, if 250 feet tall can be called limits. Neither SEPA nor the site plan review process are intended to ultimately control neighborhood character. That is the overriding purpose of the Zoning Code. The zoning requested at this juncture would permit 250 foot tall structures on property located very close to single family zones in which 35 foot tall structures predominate. That appears inappropriate. 6. Talbot Road does not appear to provide either sufficient setback or buffering to protect the interests of the single family homes east of the site or even those north of the site,north of S. 37th Street. In - addition,there is no review of the shadow impacts of a potentially 250 foot tall structure on the homes north and west of the subject site(s)and in this latitude shadow impacts of buildings located to the south,particularly on single family amenities, should be reviewed before zoning is imposed which would permit substantial shading impacts to be created. 7. Without analysis of such impacts,the rezone is untimely and should not be approved. There was not sufficient information provided and the Comprehensive Plan would at the moment not support consideration of other zoning categories at this juncture. 8. As with site plan review and SEPA, it has been shown that the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan cannot be used to lessen the density of plats where the proposed density has been determined to be intrusive and out of character with surrounding uses. Therefore,there should be no mistaken reliance on other polices or regulations when the zoning would permit 250 foot tall buildings. 9. While granting such zoning does not require 250 foot tall buildings and there are no plans for anything that large, approving the requested zoning does vest the right to potentially develop such structures. In this area,that would be inappropriate. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should not approve the reclassification of the subject site from P-1 to CO. ORDERED THIS 17th day of December, 1996. FRED J.KA MAN HEARING E' I R • City of Renton - Brain Rezone File No.: LUA-96-126,R December 17, 1996 Page 6 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of December, 1996 to the parties of record: Don Erickson Dr.Eugene Brain 200 Mill Avenue S 7710 Taneum Road W Renton, WA 98055 Thorp, WA 98946 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of December, 1996 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann, Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney James Chandler,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal - Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,December 31, 1996. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council orfinal processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. f EXHIBIT 'C' , , \ " c-ty aft it Q.) it , 'Li R-E3 --..* a g.-13 *411.,w 01. r-0 1 ,, Q) . 4_ f mei . CZ Lit, I& I _*drta 7th St Il . 11112-1 R Mil Prt 1' R-6 ii, L ikui (41,:s CI illir P- 1 . rez___ , S' / I77th . Av SE o WIPP' A.' 0 i „cl) ,-,. / 4010 all . G~ Y LONG.RANGE PLANNING LANDUSE ACTION FILE #96- 126 tiv.f. R. °'"°sk' REZONES FILE #PR-14 FROM P- 1 TO CO 0 300 600 REZONE SITE 1 :3600 CITY LIMITS • CITY-OF RE T : = ;/� EN TON„ -: /i w`�_l. r .. f T� ,: ..yr.�i' {�- t ii \�i Planning/Building/�Public•Works , im co 2UU•Mill Avenue South Renton,Washington 980.55r ' 'W` : 4-fin I4'96 e 5 *4o, ';.;.12 9 -- • -• ; • _ ' 715406. • *. . - Dr.'Eugene'Brain, DDS . _ 5454 Lake Washington SE : Bellevue, WA 98006 BRAI454* 980062004 1595 11/18/96 FORWARDTIME EGP R{N TO SEND T BRAIN 'WARREN —UGENE ST 19_N. N 77i0 7ANEUM RD W JR ` Y FIORP WA 98946 :QUO' r ;-"'• .. 1.1� . 4+ •oitioam . 1h1}} 11111!}!!i!!! lilidilli,111}}lt }tlli:, ilt1! !I1iz 9,,aa4-L •. •S . I is p p@ n iria ,,recycled paper„20%post-consumer < . "°'"alw .7111k, .!. '4 - - f- 'r /.•r" ,f .• .- ��,,t �y4�\ - Jam(�;l-;'-•- . {- gam{ , _ - - _ V.H.'�'� ..•' .` r - • CITY OF .RENTON. . ' NIL . _ Planning/Building/Public Works Department ' J e Tanner,Mayor • - Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 14, 1996 , ... • - Dr. Eugene Brain, DDS - , . 5454 Lake.Washington SE ' . ' - - , • . • , Bellevue, WA.98006 - , ,. ' SUBJECT: Brain Rezone r, ' • „ Project.No.•LUA-96-126,ECF,R .•.,,- a: , .'bear Property Owner: :. This'!•letter iti ritten on behalf of the Environmental Review.Committee and.'is to'inform.you that they have completed - theirreviewco'f:=th'e` environmental impacts of the'-above-referenced project:' ..The:Committee, on November 12, 1996, decided that your project will;be issued a•Determination of Non-Significance. - ' - The:City of Renton .Environmental •Review?`Committee has determined-;that :it'does not-have.a probable significant adverse impact on the environment.• An;'-environmental impact-'statement (EIS) is .not required under 'RCW 43:21 C.030(2)(c): This decision was made-by,the Environmental Review Committee under,.the authority.of•Section 4'-6- • '., 6,`.Renton Municipal'Code, after:review•of a completed environmental.'Checklist and other information, on file with the • lead agency.: This information.is available to the public:on request. ,' ' The 15,.day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project-will end at 5;00.PM on December 3, . • 1996. Following this,•th•e City will'finalize its Determination unless comments•received require a"reevaluation. Appeal 'procedures imposed by, the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the. Development :Services• Division, Third Floor; Municipal Building;,.,Renton, Washington 98055: Phone:_ 235-2550. You,should•.be prepared to make.specific factual objections. . . .. .,-' ; .. • ' • If you have any.questions or desire clarification of the above', please call meat 277-6181. - , F • or the Environment ev' o ittee, Donald•K:•Erickson, AICP.. : : . ::}';'•, .": . .. .. • , .r,;, : .,0:'.r!'M .;° r: r -•L•t' . - • ..'. :. t < •'! 9 t.l �.. iL'i,oi.'a�)41.; ,r r.!,i'' ;} .. .n lu:..•J•..1 f','.:1.) 'C.1."i„ `I:.,A^.; .�`' . P'roject`M'aiiage°r�, • _ ,, .., . , �; _• �. e.. �';' „ • , ., DNSLTR.Dge . - ' 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton,Washington 98055 • - - - ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ( I\ CA6? 7 it . rt •Th \ ...........r. .51,••••^""- / *(/' -'-' , , ) i 1 I t 1 , , _ }` - , 9 i \ ��, O. h b ^ /20 ► 3i3 161 ' 40., .5 "1 : /3 1•\ 1 • T' 'cam 9 t •cA 4 ins. ,000.0T. 'O V 'off• F 7 �? s s 0 7S 9v r1 V 0 .23 L. G- r , ' 9.�B �-'s ' $ p o '¢ Py a. �j" �02 .rt_-psis _ Winos '4/ -0t;- Rj, •�� I r 7 7/, 1,040 lt?�: ' :S-- ,..-- �� 2?y/jam_ O 1/44 8 ' • SiTjRD o d8 VA- �3° of h /Q' r J4c. , Zg,qe. s h k -9a.9a C5',.)itirl-- AC' O'D` 544• ry e n 0 N B2:.x-3 .� iea Cdei)l� y rs _i„‹s '- ,V...". 0 �, .ems�.,�, q� /s o �. b �� O h > • /g ,� Z g /K- Ili I 0 / ��o ` O) �, 0�5 ,b0 . 4) �o If t•- so . • --_______.e.,_ _ ...7o is 1, -- --` _ N a ob -ICI.y*c ` '--' S in I J��.,,e =� __�_3 7 _.T H. S T =oo i Ito - Q_ 0 22G J 1 r 1 N LOT 2 % S o k4. \ I� tor I c41 (4 P ' ••ii / _„. al 4. 1 ^ G. VAS G ('� v 1 ` M� i OO J III ,c aS.S4 .vli-/f,,, ,C0.2r .,,� + '1 • II^ - 1,1 i n c 1:1? oEo. s., .1.,.? „ i o .trIIO ~i :IA. PF. 3 7 • • s.d3 Ni 7L 77 /coI3o, v1 ol 'l 1 Io % NNLOT 3 ! \. IJI.9.Os•. \ op..] /os 4 0 STt.- .r a) AG *1 • • kl xj- ~"� c. Y 2 0 y a % FRS `59sd r• I V490/8 �` sy ® i? 1. . �.. frf 17 N 3•6 • 1 "� �i — v = ® I. VI PCL. A °� ot$` L I) 0-0 o 0 1 II 1 aci. zs c a4r��..? F -vel_ o3- oew goo 4 `' $ !./7' 86/.25 _ - j /od eGb _ t $ 0° 4 t . ; - , . •Iti . iv e PCL. 8 A� • a .. / 1 01 � _ ,7, 7J4�Si AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Elaine Kahns, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. 110 newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months BRAIN REZONE prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language LUA-96-126,ECF,R continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Proposed city sponsorea rezone o, vately held P-1 zoned parcel at thr Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the east corner of the Valley Medical . State of Washington for King County. campus, on the west side of Talbot Hoad The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South CountySouth from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office (CO). No change of use is contem- Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers plated as a consequence of this City initiat- during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a ed r°zone proposal. Location: 3901 Talbot. g,z,,t South. The 15 day commenpe with s con- Notice of Environmental Determination • current 14 day appealperiod will end at 5:00 PM on December 3, 1996. Following this,the City will finalize its Deter- as published on: 11/18/96 mination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures imposed The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$50.53 by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Legal Number VN2281 Development Services Division,Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be //,laqit 104117) prepared to make specific factual objec- (_5� lions. 111 (((... A Public Hearing will be held by the Legal lerk, South County Journal Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton Washing- ton, d December 3, 1996 at 9:OC AM to Subs sworn before me on this 4 a of l, consider the Rezone. Published in the South County Journal //f�N M FC tl Z November 18, 1996. 2281 otil • -. -:o A 0 T A ii-:-**".6A 7C-J11-11/41-':\C.\(\ - s-t"`Ii"p 1 4, % Notary Public of the State of Washington 4 p U B O(' (ol. . i residing in Renton `.. •...0 . C).*/,J r King County, Washington lF uF whs ' WiaWashington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DATE: December 6,1996 DEC 1 2 1996 TO: Donald Erickson RECEIVE® City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 167 MP 24.77 CS 1766 Determination of Nonsignificance- Brain Rezone 13\ duitt41/ File No. LUA-96-126,ECF,R FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning& Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located at 3901 Talbot Road South. Our response is checked below: X We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. However, we would like the opportunity to review at the time of any further development. The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to analyses the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any would be required. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name • CITY RENTQN O O CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • On the ?..lo day of V\6.11..AM , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing t+E Y'<Qo r1 documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing (Signature of Sender) 11 14.fi & 114 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that LR,4 � L' U- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Pu in and f t e State of Washing , Notary (Print) fi IQ My appointment expires: ' ... 'r A . Project Name: . N _ Project Number. ti/_ _ •L� I?, E.LF NOTARY.DOC �P • AFC.IV. ...EXA.IVI.I.IVE.R . ......... . >C>>;:>MME<,::C°IN:�+>: �'::�::<:<::fJMNCING;A'T;;...9...;aO;;AM,:;.:»> COUNCI .......HAMS RS, SECOND<.F ,OOR, RPNTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING::. ........ .... Th appbeatian(s) tasted ai'e in order of application number only and .not necessarily the order m which they will be heard Items will be called for treanng at the discretion of the Hear`rna Examiner PROJECT NAME: SPRINGBROOK ASSOCIATES REZONE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-128,R PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel located at the western end of South 38th Court that traverses between Shattuck Avenue South on the North, and Talbot Road south on the southeast from Public Use (P-1)to Commercial Office (CO). The subject site is currently vacant and will likely develop with a new retirement residence if this City initiated rezone goes through. Location: 403 South 38th Court. PROJECT NAME: BRAIN REZONE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-126,R PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1)to Commercial Office (CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. Location: 3901 Talbot Road South. PROJECT NAME: D&R ENTERPRISES REZONE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-130,R PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the southwest corner of the intersection of South 38th Street and Talbot Road South from Public Use (P- 1)to Commercial Office (CO). The existing medical/dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. Location: 3731 Talbot Road South. AGNDA.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone LUA-96-126,ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE:December 3, 1996 Page 1 of 5 PUBLIC City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date December 3, 1996 Project Name Brain Rezone Applicant City of Renton,Planning/Building/Public Works Department File Number LUA-96-126,ECF,R Project Description City initiated rezone of an irregular shaped 1.32 acre site from Public Use (P-1) Zone to the Commercial Office(CO)Zone: Project Location . .3901 Talbot Road S.,Renton,WA. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record Dr. Eugene Brain,DDS 5454 Lake Washington Blvd. SE Bellevue,WA 98006 2.. Zoning Designation Public Use(P-1)Zone 3. Comprehensive Plan Center Institution Land Use Designation 4. Existing Site Use Vacant 5. Neighborhood Characteristics North Immediately to the north are Panther Creek greenbelt and vacant 5.62 acre site proposed for future retirement residence. Uses around S. 38th Court include medical and dental offices/clinics. North of S. 37th Street area is single-family residences. East Single-family residential uses predominate across Talbot Road S. South Valley Medical Center is the predominate use south of the subject site. Uses at VMC closest to the subject property include medical office buildings and a large parking structure. DRIIRAIN.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone - LUA-96-126, ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE:December 3, 1996 Page 2 of 5 - West Valley Medical Center's North Campus and specifically the Medic Services building and at-grade parking lots. Further to the west is VMC's larger multi-story parking garage. • 6. Access Talbot Road South. 7 Site Area 1.32 acres 8 Project Data: Area Comments Existing Building Area NA Not applicable, non-project action rezone New Building Area NA Not applicable,non-project action rezone Total Building Area NA Not applicable,non-project action rezone C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: - I, Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date • Adopt Comp Plan with 4496 February 20, 1995 *ea-wide Land Use and Zoning Maps including - Zone Name Changes Adoption of Draft Comp 4405 June 7, 1993 Pllan with Area-wide Land Use and Zoning Maps Adoption of Interim 4404 June 7, 1993 Zoning Code D. PUBLIC SERVICES: L Utilities • Water Not applicable,non-project action rezone Sewer Not applicable, non-project action rezone Surface Water/Storm Water .Not applicable,non-project action rezone 2. Fire Protection Not applicable,non-project action rezone I' 3 Transit Not applicable,non-project action rezone I 4. Schools Not applicable,non-project action rezone 1 S. Recreation Not applicable,non-project action rezone 6 Other Not applicable,non-project action rezone 1 DRBRAIN.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone LUA-96-126,ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE:December 3, 1996 Page 3 of 5 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Section 4-8-14.C., Change of Zone Classification(Rezone) 2. Section 4-31-9,Public Use Zone(P-1) 3. Section 4-31-16, Commercial Office Zone , F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Policy L U-140. Regional health and/or medical facilities larger than five acres should be located in institution medical centers. Policy LU-143. Small-scale health care facilities(e.g. minor emergency clinics,practitioner offices) should be encouraged to locate in neighborhood and community commercial centers. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: i. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The current proposal is part of a series of five(5) proposed rezones of privately held properties by the City of Renton. These rezones would change the Public Use (P-1) zoning designation on the subject properties to zoning already in the area that allows many of the uses found on the five properties. The current five P- 1 rezones are part of a series of approximately fifty (50) that will be necessary to assimilate out the P-1 Zone. This consolidation of the City's zoning is based in part upon an extensive staff report that was prepared in November, 1993 the findings of which are summarized in staff's May 4, 1994, Staff Report to the Planning and Development Committee on the issue of the relevance of the Public Use Zone, given Renton's new zoning codes, and whether or not this left-over zone should be assimilated into the City's other.zones. In June, 1994, the City Council's Planning and Development Committee (see Exhibit B') directed the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to proceed with the assimilation of the P-1 Zone into other zones that had been adopted in June, 1993 and which accommodated most, if not all of the uses typically allowed in the P-1 Zone. As noted above, this recommendation was based upon a fairly extensive staff report on the Public Use Zone that was'prepared in November, 1993. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the city of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), on November 12, 1996, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-significance for these five proposed rezones, including this one. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC CONDITIONS Because no mitigation measures were imposed on this non-project action, there were no ERC conditions that the applicant was required to comply with. DRBRAIN.DOC/ • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone LUA-96-126,ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE:December 3, 1996 Page 4 of 5 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Because this rezone is a non-project action under SEPA as well as a part of a package of City sponsored P-1 rezones, comments from other reviewers were not solicited. S. CONSISTENCY WITH REZONE APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-8-14.0 "In the case where a change of the zone classification of property is recommend, at least one of the following circumstances shall be found to apply:" GENERAL CRITERIA: a) Previously Not Considered Zoning Reclassification That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning; or The subject site was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area rezoning in either June, 1993 since it was understood that Staff were studying the P-1 Zone and were preparing recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council on whether this special purpose zone should be retained, or, assimilated into the City's other new zoning classifications. Single-family areas abut the five private rezone sites to the north,east,and west and were rezoned in June, 1993 to the R- 8 (Single-family)Zone. The subject site was not included in these rezones because the City was waiting for the Council's resolution as to how the Public Use Zone would be handled. In June of 1994, the Council directed staff to proceed with the assimilation of the P-1 Zone into the city's other new zones. • b) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, Its Elements and Policies That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate; or The subject site has been determined to be potentially classified for the proposed Commercial Office Zone based upon the fact that it is designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Map as Center Institution. Objective LU-V states that such areas are to be provided to assure adequate land and infrastructure for the expansion of facilities to serve post secondary educational and health care needs of the area and protect adjacent uses from impacts of these more intensive uses. Amendments to the Commercial Office Zone are currently under consideration. If approved these would allow both medical institutions and convalescent centers/nursing homes and retirement residences as permitted uses in this zone. Medical and dental offices, currently allowed in this zone,would continue to be allowed. Accessory uses including electrical generation plants for medical institutions would also be allowed. Provisions requiring limited exterior signage for retail and service establishments would no longer apply. Because of the high number of offices/clinics in the subject area as well as on Valley Medical Center's north campus it was felt that the CO Zone,with the proposed amendments,would be the most appropriate of Renton's existing zones for this area. Also,there are areas along Talbot Road S. south of S. Carr Road that are currently zoned Commercial Office. DRBRAIN.DOC/ City of Renton P/B/PW _ry Report to the Hearing Examiner PROJECT NAME:Brain Rezone LUA-96-126, ECF,R PUBLIC HEARING DATE:December 3, 1996 Page 5 of 5 c) Timeliness of Proposed Rezone That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning, of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted- private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. The proposed rezone is timely because in June, 1995,the City adopted new zoning provisions to protect the public trust that implemented Public Facilities Policies LU-229, LU-230, and LU-231. These provisions which ensure early notification for nearby residents and property owners whenever there is a change of use, ownership, or major tenancy of any publicly owned property allowed the City to move ahead with its P-1 rezones and their assimilation to other zones.. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend approval of the Springbrook Associates rezone, File No. LUA-96-128, ECF, R, (without a public use"P"suffix attached, in this case because this is a privately held parcel),for the following reasons: 1. The rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for this parcel, 2. The rezone is consistent with City policies that encourage the location and siting of smaller scale health care facilities such as clinics, practitioner's offices, convalescent centers, and similar uses in centers rather than being geographically dispersed throughout the city. In this case, because of the intensity of some of these smaller-scale health care facilitiesit is proposed that they remain in the Center Institution center, and be zoned consistent with other commercial office uses,including clinics in the area. 3. The rezone is consistent with the proposed rezones of abutting privately held Public Use zoned properties to the Commercial Office Zone. Four other privately held P-1 zoned properties are also proposed to be rezoned to the CO Zone. This is important because the minimum lot size in this zone is 25,000 square feet, and some of these lots may have to be consolidated to achieve full development potential. 4. The subject rezone is a non-project action under SEPA and is a legislative act which of and by itself will not result in new development although will provide the potential for more intense uses than allowed in the existing P-1 Zone since the CO Zone has the potential of allowing twenty (20) story buildings because this zone allows building heights of up to.250 feet for developments on sites larger than 25,000 square feet. Note: The applicant was not required to comply with any mitigation measures since the Environmental Review Committee issued a straight Determination of Non-significance for these proposed rezones when it considered them on November 12, 1996. DRBRAIN.DOC/ f". b O r S QO�co' . /e.,• o /3 n�..: . ' „7 1� 'v 3�n •�.:.of y7 .a 5O. . ` ce 0'r O\•y��'1 is'. :L S. ��fy. ; o�wss.� •♦ e�p,j ./ ..-....o.. •7sv 9e h m•: ..12*•. 'sue a:o1 .tea 4! a� j.. tiNZ- 40 c; �°l I� roo .- 6•�TtJ nT N ; — q w'a 30 Y �� \gip ry ,lgiQt. "• '�lRD L 7 `�i op ^5 4/•. 4 \ I• r Z8LQ4. . N ems— 4i- ^a pqp ,© • S 5 a. o '.:1 2 - ^ 55-.. B S3 .5 4 'N 1 I 7s .v,az. '000Q �'' ! tLo .x ., z .x L2�,c 9� /S o t; 1TV h •h /6 t /r . o ti / �, �Q 0 0 / �ko 0) �.0 p160 k 0 /B h d o ,2g 1 e ��:k R;T. p1b O ro LG 4' 0 I % �' .. -, ter.co. • �9� r: Q S 5 '" N J o is 7s /ab ® • ' G 4ci.9s - s v J.E. , ..3-' :TH o) .- r S T. 20' q. 1 Leo • 'F tee.--�Z . ,r1 'V • = Q- R LOT z e ; • A • ti1� r♦ .. LOrL ,I i•, Lor. F QP • O 11' kg8 z p .B9-" M�Q�G PSn' a.s� ''9. o A7 = 1. //T. J I/f.IL ce.s4- yt'.0A, 'Co.=g- •f'• 1 1\ • Cti 13 ���. P• F.' � 9 0-5- /i df.-- . V.77 • - /Co-- •I 0 C> AG. 3 9'26 I • ale 2l' I sl i ioIN 1 2 \ Lar, I O NO Lod p 7G./G 0 LL �'r-�'`. 0 . N'i 9 a J2 II V' V 13-78- 70I2149018 'may s0 0 h • 79U3D.\�L f , N 0 Z ^1 � P . ter- sat AL• jj • PCL C 1`_. C • o PCL. A ot85. 000 �.5 . adA25 S a� ItF .vea-v.s-aew, soo I. �l.?3f 7. BB/.25 _ 'I /on Zq7 ' _ 1JE¢ 31-25—5 4 h vim, Igo �1� I: g$ O`i .; 3h • . W ` h PCL. B p"•• %.ii . tri _ 5e9 o A/8 •ag-08 k/ 346.4e. b el fi ceo to W �� Ip.23/ 30 _go29 qi t' Eoi c1 o• V �. I ire. 70 85 b t S 177 �' (A se,-ce-46E M -r, /o5.9B 7 .��`g I h� 4 8qi& r \D { EXHIBTT` 3' -• EXHIBIT 8Er Di PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT • (JUNE 6, 1994) • • PUBLIC USE ZONE REVISIONS • (Referred 5/24/94) The Committee recommends that staff proceed with the assimilation of the P-1 Zone into existing zones. The Committee also recommends that staff continue to work with all interested parties to address concerns of the Planning Commission and the Planning and Development Committee related to preserving the public trust and revising the development standards related to these uses. • This,action will allow staff to proceed in a timely manner with amendments to the Comprehensive Plan related to these public uses. The Committee will continue to work with staff on the remaining issues and report back to City Council prior to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. • • The Committee recommends City Council concur in this report. Kg0—ellZA 1/0k0-4"44-1 • Kathy Keg er-Wheeler, Chair • • Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair R dy Corman, em er . • ,06271 • pdca.nroC • EXHIBIT `C' \ I I. 1"-o co' bilk 4 . \ ,Air ii ____________, R-45 , c.=_, * „,,,,giA. • i,Q)Li i , •(z.) $ rnv• • ccy S. r e Ea r èi _ th Str . • - �'�� e'er ' Se cih f . ' . Illik ! eit fir P- I i . I 172th .. Av * . SE ' S: *1 P- i : 0 A • . . . ,<:, •o so„,,,.._ • , ,_,-s • • LONG RANGE PLANNING +0+ Don EridcsonLANDUSE ACTION FILE #96- 126 It_0 "" 7M 1996 REZONES FILE. #PR- 14 0 300 soo FROM P-1 TO CO :.:.::; :;.:.;.:.: :.:.::..;:.:,>: ::::: - REZONE SITE 1 :3 6 0 0 CITY LIMITS • w,, .,..v:::��:x •:•:,•v. v•.\:. vv}...ti;....;.,...,v.....:...... ...:.:. ...,. .,,.i....x•{. •. v,,glfS " felitW n}:tfv;...:..v :... v \1.. .A. Y nS .. v : .. 1 }:v� : R 1'fvwr .n. .•:.,:...... •+:':??:';.}.?,+..r• {n}}T}>}'•:M•:v}:;.ti:.•• yn}}4v; }:f:'•}+'.,.;.t.,. +f.. 4•. k. n. ^4 \ : \`2 } fiu• "'ti ' •.}; ::.: :.4::.,+t•<rtyr yak:idbtt" " }+• ++X:;a•}vfi•. Yf;.,f. n•.}...Cvkr „•},ek'4,1,• +f!x'`fi �:t 4.tr 1k°X••,f�,.k�C,S�:a,. }• ,4>.r > �� :•;C,c. .S ' , f•4;,<1ertgl" TG. •:}• ,..t:' r.4.:• ::r..: f" „rrr;•:•:t• •.*�'•x. 1. �. `{+•+f }.,.Sk. ....,}..+1 "'S�r.". r�`S.. J."+;�, r. 3.t �i»w ' ,ikki •••k,.`,v,^ck{n. t.. €u,: : »,;.,`.t•: tkv •`?,- •.G�n.,..q ,.. :.,n.. ts AA �'..,t....},:,�.;2.n,.;.} .,:}}:,., .f.}�'{^., . '' �....,f\k?:t•:•v?:kCv�•...:t, ..� {,.+: xo-,.'�lifi}•ri�. :�' ,�,�{};f,..'•:;r,.1t} n,3':�v:,.,r}�o 9 ..}{ .;{�rii'a;, }.•:;r + r.,.;e,.rw.t2�^ .t:;, >.{t,.;:rk:' .v ''r{ �O :f: '• }..,; •¢ ;, ..4. ��^ }:4 ..;.y,. y"�. f "v.�� x , } ? .{: ..,..k••.. ..rf... .. £. ,,.......�:.n..:. :.0 : � f.•:.:rr. }.'£.... .. :. .. , ,.. : .:v w .f.......:.,l...v.f , .,4.:if}}v:-{:v+.,•:{••.}.• +�:{x:.... .. .: .n.. ....... :..,P�t#. x�}..t t, r.r, T {J. ..,.v: ,?w. .. •.:• �kri•.}{k�:•;� •{.„�..k }Q....,t., �..� '} .kk'rnr.x . . .,}.., ..,.. t: t }.. . �:: 1w„ ..4 ::...w.f,. .,.,;%•:k ,: ..r.,R S..f.•.�:::•?.f:f}�::.}`•::f:.....fi :.t.r.C. n .. r•...,.,}...,..::,4..::.:� .+rf. n r ., �,:.. ., .....T....,r•>y.:�.,•:.. } �V' {::•`�k• .T� ?:'•.^fir.. . . .. ......,...f.f...0. .:..... :.. .....:�£..f..,r}. nf,::, .....: r ..... ... .ri4.rt.. •r. } �2 T�'..t:.�':•: ., +•:v,:kv��+r:•x :,•::..r:.,nrx ;r.}:v..,c.,:�' .,..,:; ... ...,.,...... .:T......uv..... . .$..SY0:1 , n..., >r, ..t ,,.:. %1 „.. , , .c ... .. '• :i: , ....£. :£k'• S,X1•},•s• kv '•fv,+v;t,n,t: :' .?iK::n•.,.; :.Y:.::{.;...t•,:;; ,;:.; ;{• •y. .t �.,..n:•n.}.S?.:...:.;^S{:N.,r:: .F ;.;c;;r}�•�Yt .0 x:•Y.r. .,r: r7 �• n :: ,. ..A'rf;.nynf., ..�;x�. mow„t}.,.. G.r.: k1 :;.}+S .,.fx•:+r•..�t �c .�SYf:4', .u} } f!{�4: ...>.. .........,.,,,.....,r. n, a TS r.: .. ..£. .,.....,r.....:,.v...fi t�ci.....}�.fi GT.•,:..»ac' r .. tL ..rr:+ x:.. .,•:•. :\yf '^k?{r. .)4'{ u...,.k{ ::.2: t3•a: i.,,r: :;•?;.y.;{4c•:•., 4 'ty,• :.,41i., ;T;npK{,..y. }.{x..F.:,n:{tix.:•:.,:•}nt,�.v.:4t;k+.,?. :Y;... .,;. .}f.,{'.Y:, f ,, ;,x....},.c h1•..:.1p .Tn').� .>£:,1, ,r� f.. , .rx•+ »•»�} � ...:.,••... ,.r.,, •r .,n1,.,,. 'r•?c}.,::n, ,•• 3rf: :�,:;:a•\b:r�f'W'f ..xx:wf. �cr,.;.T�'?E: .;T..r., .c::T}:.f.,,{v'#�.. 3 .,+: ,.fi. } =:ih::kf,Y.;£"::•. :k:S a.,,n:T.,,3nkt ,,,;.{ ,r. SSS#•4 <:}+/.•,f...,.. ,:.:,,: :,,. , )w: ,.. 'S?.n ', :,4.:Ek S}:;{„. ,%.t}i\•}••}?f•}••i" .:A .}•. fSR•. ,fi .:C:..f,r :.S..n. ..Cr... .^�� ar, f }'w'�1.'• ;;•>k.••vi�}3}:�c}. »/2: ufa.»r.,.a ,yR.,;,.ry.,r..,},.y 'i :{.}•,,..kr;xfi ,yc: ..i.. ::t•:r ,f}x,...n:•:.S 4{;:•. + 'S`.:, : 1� �;;,v ,F ..td•. w.... :Y.: x. u. 7F�✓ t: '.;.f.±?,y :•f:{•?{•?:{.4.�•:- ,,fi•}.•.;,...:♦ :•�.�. n4•i A:\ £•.0 Ck4••::YFx:.. :.�. :.ti r} .k {':i:n.1 L}f!}{'}:f .�G r4}�.�l•: }n:,a:;:44a:,.}; ,?t2 .f..:.:�x ..t, •.b r nY.. .) •0r ':?�•'� }S••vt, �:{T. y.,t:. ,H.w\'{{{.•.yt• •��•., '?,• r.< .1•:'n'i4:^:�,.ct,. v:•. •u.n.....:,i'%£r:,}.,.k, :.{k,•r,:•. \ {�,'r S:+tk,, + •nv.,, .... tt: ,.,r .. ..mil t •.icy r: u {�},; i,.;..f}. ..,1:�u,4. ..r`. �� .1.4•.:'•:••+•':,:... 'Y n,...,..� »}k•...:un,.., .. �{{{,... .4.•:... „ ..4. ..:.,.f:.::�,•.a. ,r 1•�. '.•' ' 4,r{c•, nGi.•, k T>... +A, r•.:':?�: •:•:}:...»,.,..........,:.....n....>>T.k, ,........ .......:.. ...........�, , � �.t,,.r ak.:....t...n r�•) �y,..;. �}1'{���/•:�ir9F.``.���' t.t} f naT}.•�.. w•,wT:•o. ..>{.v.;{.�„£•f... .v:. ......,....n.n.v..........n..,f....»..... n'Fi.....r.... v.v. ....n vT.., .v.r..., v 4` 4 Ffi...... A...... ... .4 v. v.•1 „. �': n @'}k.•}i•:4...\.:.v1�.,; }f. �' :{4'�Ci{:}T?iF. $�}4r t { r.£T?,•..... .T. .Y.�...v..v.. „4 ... v.....n.......................:.............n.A.. ..........,fi.:..�:.....nv.....T,v f.n,...\ :....n.n...,k.... .,.f.v.x..n..r..v , : n1v. .: .:4..:.v:.. ..........r.... :$`n:,+ •.}}Tr �/ .{4r:•�f}:.:... .n+T:,.fr.. .:w.•:..{•Y•i: ...:}h....... ,....v.4.....v..v..v n. � ,yin...n{W....../.v.n } r..w. .. '+Y •»•}v rr f...:n wk•.{�'i•A}...,.f... r.f:?r•,+•}`,:ii..n...........:::....,,........,{.....:......}....Sn.n.........,.,.........., ,r:»•.. T}...........:�.....:....:.:...,..,.........#•1. :}� �}• f....,f..}......:..f.....:..T.;;:::tn.... ...».£,:3:FJ.,r...:..,.t.tr:�C.}...:,.,......,.:.:.r..,:...,.,tk.t....t .:.....•..:....}r:::}:'y}:t?•:a::.t..,...,n.,•}:::::. ..:.........:...... r:::•:,•::•i:•.,};::rk�::;^•.:::£•ck::k::::k::.,.. ....... .. ...., .Y'?.roki+£:k:f?{:k:f::f•:�'r::}}:::•::k?'•::S£:�:kkkf{S�£:x,.ryk:•;:;kt.+:f:;}:;:.t:•}:•i:;:.:ii}:•}::S•}::•}:�f:.}:•k}kk:}• • ;.:;.};:::.... r:.tf;•;r:::;££S:}::::SSS£::%:k•S£:;k:::::f£S£•:S::S{:? . .. .. .. .. .. .. ...n...........v.v...n.n}:.n....v:..n.:.n......x..x.\n,n...............x.....v......v v..n........ ....... .. .. .:.................. ........... .v .... ...... ... ..f. .. .n.....{...:::;..:. :::;}..t{T{:;:tf%;'k�££ti^:k�:J£{:}kL£££:•£:t.'{::•:}}:•v.•:rti%£''<ti{rl: . .. .. ..:. .. ..:..... .n::t.:.:................n•....r......:.x.:...::...: :.....:n..:x.v.1:v..:v:.:•r••::.w:.v£:::.,v;n...n.;..:r•, ... .. ... .. .. ... .. ...f...v.v.{,.... .. ...T.. ........rn....................................... .......,..:..........,.v .. .. ..}.. ::?.;r,.•.,,:.}:•:{:�:iti{<:::•£}::::tfk4:•:ti•}nt''}:... }::t}:t•£'•i}%.}Xf'•: ::UBI.. U O ,...............}.........::�� �Q1VfM��t�f..l,,.OF .O O. ...:.::.::}::::.:,......,.:.,.:::::n.::::::n•:n::{.,.}';::n.::;fii£::£££> <:'t:::::.:.,.i.rr.,..,.:}. Government buildings such as schools, hospitals, libraries; Offices: administrative/headquarters; professional; Business Park and Ride lots; Municipal utility (facilities; Municipal Serivces; general; Business and professional schools, Airports; etc. business services; existing neighborhood, community, and regional parks, trails, and open spaces; existing public and - private elementary and secondary schools/portables existing ask of June,7, 1993(site plan review for expansions less than 10%); theaters; utilities, small; existing use designations(see . code for complete explanation 43-31-16.h) • STREET SETBACKS ' STREET SETBACKS Arterial (major/secondary) .30 feet Street Setback front 15 feet Arterial Collector 25 feet Street Setback 25 feet or less(15-30) feet Moderate Density Residential 20 feet 25-80 feet (15-25) feet All others 20 feet over 80 feet (30-50) feet Rear/Side none required RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS(from abutting lots designated residential) RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS(from abutting lots designated residential) Low Density Residential 50 feet Not Applicable . • Moderate Density Residential 20 feet MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT Public Buildings • 50 feet* General 250 feet (bonuses up to 50 feet exist Public and Private Utilities 20 feet for additional amenities) • Residential Adjacency 20 feet over residential max: MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE . MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE • No limit other than established by yards. 65% of the total lot area 75% if parking is provided within the building * 75 feet permitted subject to specified provisions,such as increased setbacks,sloped roofs,etc. 4f OF RENTON ;;' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November21, 1996 Dr. Eugene Brain, DDS 5454 Lake Washington Blvd. SE gee �'� .t_�'1K'� �'1 �` Bellevue, WA 98006 6ev e of artdVeS. SUBJECT: Brain Rezone Project No. LUA-96-126,R Dear Property Owner: The date of Tuesday, December 03, 1996, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing to, review the above-referenced rezone. The'hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner,, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you prefer to make other arrangements to receive the staff report, please contact Karen Codiga, 277-5582, or Sandi Seeger, 277- 5581. If you have any questions, please call me at 277-6181. Sincerely, DM r�C Donald K. Erickson,AICP Project Manager HEXLTR.Doc 200-Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®:This paper contains 50°.,recycled material,20°°post consumer ...... ...:.... ...:::.•: .. .......C..........:..r. ..........r::::.....n....:.. •. .?^:f}v.T::•T:t::i'f.:*':::;:.+.:Y.!.{.r..:;v;.v,:}}.h.:ti.' 'F,•;:y,:i•S!if>.�}t..Y':Y}Yxri}}f}}J::::.:.:.-.'v.. v:vj••::�w::+;+•::ri::•::S:•Y'•:F•>•:•::ix::?•.v::n.r. •r.J}; .<. .:..}:..: .yf. .i jjG,'r'J?vtp�.Svqct r.`f r:,•;.; .}fr::: ..r:.. '•>Y}t}.}}T;?•}}r:. ..i*'.�`'v�fi:`Y/.•2:{•}3n:...rT.`f.-.?'.:;}:}:'^•.<v/.: f..f^4��'0"-' r..f..r{:::v:+.y{.; ...C:;r.'tc'Yi. ..}.r .r>...... ,/..:•,;}•r:}}+ +r:`rDt•.. s !a��`}r :•.::.T.. x.:,r{. .:.r.v..•::::•:w;r r. n:.n:w:•:•:�ww.: :}:. .r. .::.....:+rx:::{:r}}L«{:>}>::.Y:r:}:�.;.:f.,:..,�::.T:::.,::.::.v:........r. r..:.:..,... iTY�:OF:.R NT.OIV�:�}}:.::?.::.>:.:::..:. :..a.t�•T �`Y+gy..!v; ' •::,•:::r...r-r. •:fi:r:r,n...:.. ..A, .:.k•::..:-rvr.:•:.. ..�..;F.,...:: ..,:,,h:;{:�{.{�Y.f,•Y3• ••.�t+n.. r,M.�;:' :�{��^-^ ...........r.... ...r.... ....r:..�f. .......t t..A+-:.. :::r,.r?rf•{.Yf;:{{:•}Yt.:;?::.�!.{-.:,::!,•.,n.;.;{{•:5�::.tY,..::.>•rofi•:•...::•:::....-.:,%••}::••:Lt{6'{::h:'t:l:;:YE'•�t:;:v:: :�... ,.�.C{'/ : v:.w:n v:h•.v:::vvrv:::::::4.:+r w:v::�w.v:,-::.::r•x:,r-+,{.//�. r:::nr.r... ..: n..,r...n..:.. r{:•.L;•r.::v:: 3�� vt� }i'f.{{i'rr.L•:�;{!;$:xt:fr{{�yY;�.C%:>�:S:t�!:{}!3q:2}9i+:+✓:XK{{{YFi:lt,..::f.4.i;`yn},f.4 r.r,{ nvT:v ..Y}...�r�: { !:'- +3 rav +!:fft{::r++.4+:rn+i vnv:f:f:::A:::A:v:r:.v!•x:+•::•rv.•xrr:rn•::/•:. iir,.:r...:•:.v: .v'•r/.r.4..n,. ..yY r• ..S ,.r • T}Y.G }•,.3'f.}rt$}vrf:nr•;n;},:{::.}.:..:.:.r . rrr.,}:, .,,}�r:,t.0• NT�: .:.LANNI `�iSICiN;;:Y,: ...L r. , ..�f��;s�: :.> .:.v�-� ��,vt-: �:` !.in•.y,:+ r.:f.:+A•{•rY•...n.,v;,u:i+i;w?`+YL•>••.u-r: -Yfr/.�:�A:{•-::.. ::/+,:{:}tj{{:;;.✓.tYrr,:'/.{?;:,f:: � :y.:�.,. :.< xtr.�. . -:Yfnr:rf/ .r/......9 .? .b...f..{n..{.::••T ::f+::,.{:.L•}}}ixo{x; ,.n...{.,: to .:ff^.. .7r`'�.. <�> 3}4tc+:.n.....:...x....•!n:;;.,:/. ,cry.,:r..;;... .. r..:•:!20}}:?{%.:}:�:•x":!•}}}}:r:{!i;:�ctt{•:::{;+:}:•: ......:v}:{{.}:{ii:i:S iiy{::f.!j'i:{.{/•:;{4'�x v-:�{:.{:•:{�r r.:::•n ':Y ...:. .. ...,t,. .,. �, +b+lrf 3.• .bjx: i�}:•ii%: •}:rrrr•,.+ Y:}:•3}!»}Y:t•.`•::::•Y:}t} :a:••:: '.:,-r. ::..rn:;! .,3 3. :L•..p' y{ir. _ :;•}:??t.l::•}}:•>:?<{}f?t.�{.{.;{.;;fin•:+Y: :� •?r..:er.{}AY:t:;t tn..,:.>;{}: .; •. ��• .� r}�yL3>{{ .{a....•{ !.;>{c..:. �J n.>. _ :.Y..'../�FF1DA1l�'f:OF;SER�I..CBY`�V1AlLlN:(3�:.. ;�rx{..,. �,r:<.: n.:, _r _ ::•..v:,/,.r,....:vf..:,/..:n. .:1;;:{n::nri+t{•::::f•::•f.^.:.t>...L•::{} ,r..9:'}!'.:...:...::::......v:..:..:;::•?.::::•.:•.v::.:n....:..::.:....,•:: ....M1.......:.........:.:..,{v. t+..f•,..v.:{>/,..n..�}' .. .•r.{-::-.:}+{..r.,^:•r':.: •rr.+:A!{•:H.V: ..{:n.L•n t..;frT:>..,{ r •fn{•}:}'f.-A}}•:.+.•:Y/.tv:fT.+Y..: :}xY+3.x f.+n.{{{nh!4.vv.x. ,^!/S} 42' ..+r::::•T+r:•r::•rA:?:• .;c,{:t?;yt�:::;• 33.. :.+:,�; ;}{.ti:.•.y:..c{••T:::'•it:y:? ?�}}}Ti::;} :.:r:Y.:�:;}::.rr r , -o?T:k:•:3:. 1fr .:r..r.'.....o..:a;;!:.}•a.:{:.:..:..::,..,.rr..�if:;F•}k� r;.;•{.:t+:}:3:{{{.}a{.{.: ..>..::.,•:{!•:�.•.ff.•.�.: {G:T!...... xf.a::LPL.i... ...tr.61. jX�•: ifS�} •:,fv.vx-�::.. ,.{ .C.. :•-$'i'y'8n :fv•::::f}i}r:r:�•v•:+:;}::x}:v.n} •�•y.•}? •`.:?•T ..^.�YrY•"n+ + ti.• r.ri:f-.::r. -:::r{n::{y;:x}r:• x..:�:+.::•x:x::v}:xv},•.x•S::u�{ifl.'!.%•ytrr.!:?.v r.•r...n..n:{::{.nv..., .x.ni%f.!}{?f,.;•>}}:y{}{{.y;}.}v.{;{{{{{{.T:?:�i'f.{ ...{ ..L. .r{+n{....t.:n.. ::fx..:.n. ::::::{.}'. ;.:.... ....rr..n..r .,.....v..m•::.fr.vn•.rr .ri..x....:. vr} `!'•' :.+.n .:.....+ nx4.iy:.v.v:n••:n•:: <1'+}y ..�i ..r. ...r...n..+... :.::..... .... m.v...v.:n•:nw:::r:•.:::•{}•.•+:n:;fi::}.vm}}:Ri;.:.;{??-�........ :.}...:::..��^%-..Cr.... vtin`+�.Y:{ ..... .... ...:r:..•.:......................................:.r{:{:..::::Y.vn:{..•.;{.i}:tt:..:;.}}..vv::i:.......:..:..............:. ..nv..:.::...... ......: ..``JJ .:A:.')t On the ti444 day of r NeM eY , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERG d�rt"earr1nty iavtiS • documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing 1Zic A" 4% EccIl kw� •c'o • ta'tgY' lltidta►n ('mat to l lifsA • ef U t\av; kailn.e.r` T prt' 4.1sve.nem. 'I..)aytd t ^C' ofRoluati-LIZe.soLutem tZtc�c. Atirid cote t `�' —T' 'sPc v Sue. 7RwrveG 1 e f' 'Q%.tw ts\ 142m—C"Y��c. o VY\akcoWt , 4'tshevees Weucklest 1v dtah Tr4L (Signature of Sender) SO.YaNl. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING 0 ) y �— /� -I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �.)14 71 K. xC-- E;l signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary •act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Dated: 7 I /if 66 J •I• Notary P is in an f r the State of Was irtgtoh • z ag3rl Notary rint)rn A I C �'E Tic: rakt:/K • My appointment expires: ( ,. 7� F's= .:: ' , • Project Name: co 2otnc -rev tvreirtittexi_ j V1 RetehG Oh Re-cainc 15, 1 'Bne Project Number. %- 125 r °Ito - 1210 , R, 41‘ - 127 R,EC.= - NOTARY.DOC y _ •" ` CIT1, )F RENTON a. '�‘ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 13, 1996 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 - Olympia, WA 98504-7703 . Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on November 12, 1996: . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE BRAIN REZONE LUA-96-126,ECF,R Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1)to Commercial Office (CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. Location: 3901 Talbot Road South. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on December 3, 1996. Following the end of the comment and appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a re-evaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. If you have questions, please call me at (206) 277-6181. e ironment I vie Co rn ttee, (-of-th Donald K. Erickson, AICP Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources _ Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper contain,50" recycled material,20%post consumer .. , .:.4. Rt, CITY' -)F RENTON mart$,,, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman RE.,Administrator November 14, 1996 Dr. Eugene Brain, DDS S¢e rvoS off`« f tf• N- 5454 Lake Washington SE et Bellevue, WA 98006 C N J►o1C. `l1< ..ad,mss. SUBJECT: Brain Rezone Project No. LUA-96-126,ECF,R Dear Property Owner: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on November 12, 1996, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. - The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the Environmental Review Committee under the authority of Section 4-6- 6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The 15 day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end at 5:00 PM on December 3, 1996. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 277-6181. For the Environment ev' o ittee, (7).44.J . . . Donald K. Erickson, AICP _ Project Manager DNSLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ® rhis paper contains 50%recycled material,20°:,post consumer CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: November 13, 1996 To: Don Erickson - From: Jana Huerter/ Environmental Review Committee Subject: Brain Rezone Project No. LUA-96-126,ECF,R On behalf of the Environmental Review Committee, I would like to inform you that they have completed their review of your project. The Committee, on November 12, 1996, decided that the subject project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the Environmental Review Committee under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The 15 day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end on December 3, 1996. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. dnsmm i i NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: BRAIN REZONE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA•96.126,ECF,R • Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus,on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial 1 Office(CO).The existing dental offices would be a permitted use In the new CO Zone. No change of use Is contemplated as a consequence of this City Initiated rezone proposal.Location:3901 Talbot Road South. , THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED • THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE . ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. l- YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM,_ THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. I ' n APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING I EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, . IMI YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 3. 1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,DECEMBER 3. 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. R-8 .. may . .) rW �36t1 ).. 1 Im R-e; a > P•i t 32tlr,8t 1 s .ih w i j J _CA -P-1 L, ` ar 1 • 4.' ; II & Al Q. h..'P'-n.:I-- 1177th Ave • .(, wiL1EL, c2 y . uEdck.aim.ti joo ,c : aro• 4� s S 43rd'SL -- t ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235 2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ' Please Include,the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION • I, Sttryii4 J(LC.KS W1 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . ki0VtAmte V t4, t't (8 . Signed: L(.1 CLL �����d /mil . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 0 ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ` I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that P ___.7- c "/ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volunt?ry‘kalar �•uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ;,s sq)- 6 �.t Dated: /i i tf/q r Qna, NotaryPubli i and for Stag` f,l/Wa tgn° : J� • a. 4, Notary (Print) P `T '�''t-• .L� My appointment expires: 67 NOTARY.DOC . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: BRAIN REZONE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-126,ECF,R • Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1) to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. Location:3901 Talbot Road South. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, . THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 3, 1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, DECEMBER 3, 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. • Ca • CD R g .�, —.°� w -gam.. ::R: -ao. .I •36th-.s 1- .� fix 3 >- -- ` ' S'37tirt 1 ' 51th . • -I ffA= ' -- (177th Ave. v• AC'LEY �V t- MEDICAL CthTER I 'p ./ %-c) -CJ :t • � 4a �' ai CD S 43cd'St. coon • • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION P..leaseinclu:de>.th°e'project:,NUMBER when calling for proper:file:identifications :::; . 1 � CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-126,ECF,R APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PROJECT NAME: BRAIN REZONE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1) to Commercial Office (CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3901 Talbot Road South LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on December 3, 1996. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: November 18, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: November 12, 1996 SIGNATURES: 2r)egg1141 11.(LeMPtd714 ja/L116 m an, Administrator D Depart nt of Planning/Building/Public Works Chastain, Administrator //Z// . m A mirnstrator DA'f, Community Service Department // /� Le eler, ire Chi DATE Renton Fire Department DNSSIG.DOC ( _ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON • The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. BRAIN REZONE LUA-96-126,ECF,R Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1) to Commercial Office (CO). No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. Location: 3901 Talbot Road South. The 15 day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on December 3, 1996. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on December 3, 1996 at 9:00 AM to consider the Rezone. Publication Date: November 18, 1996 Account No. 51067 dnspub • STAFF City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERCMEETINGDATE November 12, 1996 Project Name Public Use(P-1)Rezones Applicant City of Renton File Number - LUA-096-126 - LUA-096 Project Manager - Don Erickson 130 Project Description See attached Proposal Description&Summary. Project Location 5 sites in vicinity of Talbot Road S. and SW 38th Court Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Not applicable. Proposed New Bldg.Area gsf Rezone,Not applicable Site Area Not applicable. Total Building Area gsf Rezone, Not applicable RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non- significance for these non- project rezone actions. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A•.eal Period. X Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. Project Location Map . ERC10-28.DOC City ofRen'ton PB/PWDepartment 1 mmental Review Committee Staff Report CITY SPONSORED P-1 REZONES, O.-..-VE PRIVATE SITES LUA-96-126-LUA-96-130,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFNOVEMBER 11,1996 Page2 of4 C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. These five rezones are considered to be non-project, legislative actions. As a consequence these rezones will in and by themselves not result in any actual physical development. Specific proposals resulting from this proposed new zoning, if it is approved,which are not exempt because of size will have to go through SEPA review. Impacts identified at that time could be mitigated. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Nexus: N/A 2. Air Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures:Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Nexus: N/A 3. Water Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Nexus: - 4. Plants Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 5. Animals Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. ERC10-28.DOC • it City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment 'vnnrental Review Committee Staff Report CITY SPONSOREDP-I REZONES, tir"iilVE PRIVATE SITES LUA-96-126-LUA-96-130,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFNOVEMBER 11,1996 Page3 of4 6. Energy and Natural Resources Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 7. Environmental Health Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 8 Land and Shoreline Use Impac s: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 9. Housing Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 10. Aesthetics Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 11. Light and Glare Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 12. Recreation Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 14. Transportation Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. ERC10-28.DOC it City of Renton PB/PW Department E inmental Review Committee Staff Report CITY SPONSORED P-1 REZONES, 01`= PRIVATE SITES L UA-96-126-LUA-96-130,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFNOVEMBER 11,1996 Page4 of 4 15. Public Services Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to.the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 16. Utilities Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. E. COMMENTS OFlREVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable,these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ERC10-28.DOC Proposal Description for Five Private Rezones from P-1 to CO Zone 'In 1994 the Renton City Council authorized the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to proceed with the assimilation of those sites currently zoned Public Use (P-1) into Renton's other 21 zones. The need for this zone had been lessened by the City's 1993 Interim Zoning Code which included a number of new zones, most of which provided for most, if not all, of the uses previously allowed in the P-1 Zone. Also, analysis revealed that there had been a great deal of inconsistency in the application of the P-1 Zone over the years in that many public uses were not zoned P-1, having been adequately accommodated in the prevailing zones where they were located. Other reasons for changing the zoning were that the City had recently adopted new provisions providing greater development flexibility for ommunity facilities as well as a an early notification process for all publicly owned properties henever there was a change in ownership, use, or major tenancy. In 1995 the City Council approved the first of the P-1 rezones to other zones,approving nine publicly sponsored private P-1 rezones. The current proposal is a continuation of the P-1 rezoning process begun in the fall of 1995. It involves City initiated rezoning of five (5) privately.held P-1 zoned parcels located immediately north of Valley - Medical Center, near the intersection of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South. The five sites in question are designated Center Institution on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. All five of the current batch of privately owned P-1 zoned parcels are proposed to be rezoned to the Commercial Office(CO)Zone. Vicinity maps and legal descriptions for each site have been provided as part of the Master Application. Proposal Summary for Five Private P-1 Rezones It is the City's intent to phase out and eventually eliminate all of its current P-1 zoned properties by assigning other nearby zones that currently accommodate these uses or which can be easily amended to accommodate these uses are in place. The subject proposal is to rezone five(5)privately held properties located immediately north of Valley Medical Center near the intersection of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road S., (all on the west side of Talbot Road S.), from the Public Use(P-1)Zone to the Commercial Office(CO)Zone. The subject proposal, a legislative act, is considered to be a non-project action under the provisions of WAC 197- 1�1, SEPA Rules. Subsequent development proposals on these five (5)sites would be considered project aictions. An Environmental Checklist has been prepared for the proposed rezoning of these five privately held, P-1 zoned sites to the CO Zone. 5RZNSMRY.DOC/ • City !nton Department of Planning/Building/F•. - Works ENVIRONMENTAL It DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1)64*.s COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1996 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 kp&ATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH • SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the-west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet � � �0� ) mil. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS G2/1.e C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS NzA€VbC_ a/ .— /Zap C12) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess t ' proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 City_ enton Department of Planning/Building/I .Works ,. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1:•01uLe. COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1996 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 1.,pgATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SITE AREA: N/A ( BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation , Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Nititft,DY'-- 1 nk-Pa-0-7t 0 IlL f D I LU vA 0 ,Cfba. ' B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Ltd 1(19.1e /0 CZ —9(0° Signature of Director or d the ed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City r.._ 'nton Department of Planning/Building/Pi,.,__,'Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVI W SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Coves -Tlavl seituo.-0 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5,, 1996®,,%, APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1996 � O APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON •y 74 PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 •-' a &ATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH 4'04# SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. •i A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoricCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet _14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS oopa C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • VOP6 • . We have reviewed i plication it particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition i f o i to prope assess this proposal. Signature of Dir tor or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City =tenton Department of Planning/Building/f Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET — REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p1 te) .— 4 OMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1996 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 So��' kpkATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH � SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A onT 2 ia SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held:P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to C rhesc,,,,g'Kif fice,(Qp). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a cc""oonsectuejfof this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information impacts impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities , Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS �o COv1IWI t Iftt We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information J isjr eeded to properly assess this proposal. /I)t uk1 r0/z y,46 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City anton Department of Planning/Building/P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICAT�L(OON REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Five P COMMENTS DUE: NO VEl6EKreP96'V APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOB R/r22,:1996J96 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: D .N ERICLKSON PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 , KKATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SITE AREA N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS • Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities , Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public ServIces Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet ,{ NI / 9 14,000 Feet /V0 NI/at f irnpic- S /Vote. c� B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • it)� C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS rVlf We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio a!information is n=: =d to properly assess this proposal. 414,11,t M/ a3`/7L Signature f Director or Authorized Repr entative Date DEVAPP. C Rev.10193 City :Fenton Department of Planning/Building/Pl1YllV Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT ,mobZ COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF„R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1996r.B'OF RFp4TON APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON Pr-"Fri6F:r4 PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 nri- 71 1996 NATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SITE AREA: N/A BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A kiLALLAN6d iS0® SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west-side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air - Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1)o C©lyiwlev t • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information/ ) is needed to properly assess this proposal. f Jeci vV 1 o/zw/1 d Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City • anton Department of Planning/Building/P' _: Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Sal& j W( jE ' COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1996 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON CaF ®N PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE• WORK ORDER NO: 78144 ;Inv. p&ATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A bUtLo DIVOSVN SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants _ __ Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities . Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historlc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS lUb C v1/1►4evvt • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information�is l.needed to properly assess this proposa Vetch 0/ ll /2_4 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 ® NOTICE OF.,PROrUSED ENVIRONMENTAL/REwwNE APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Rezone (R)-Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BRAIN REZONE/LUA-96-126,ECF,R DESCRIPTION: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1) to Commercial Office (CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. GENERAL LOCATION: 3901 Talbot Road South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Rezone The date of Tuesday, December 3, 1996, at 9:00 AM, has been set for a Rezone (R) public hearing to review the above- referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal. periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project . NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. -ci CD R--8 '... .R_8- I .. co c 'is R:.8 5 3 h ` ' 57th U 8 j/� 6 • , . A fs.177th Ave. VALLEY Lk,W � ' MEDtCAL CENTER - )1 >A\ . .:-..., / Q1/ 0 f' f. CO i • (,,o- GENMALOT.DOC S 43rd St. #.0.0 axp) 1 ....._....._..� 1 r—':-- tl 3023059002 - 3023059026 ' 3023059034 • CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON BRAIN W EUGENE DDS 200 MILL AVE SOUTH 200 MILL AVE S 54544LK WASHINGTON BLVD SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98006 3023059040 3023059044 3023059045 HURST G A HOSKIN THOMAS J WILLARDSON MARION C 3619 TALBOT RD S 9370 46TH AVE SW 409 S 36TH ST RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98136 RENTON WA 98055 3023059052 3023059053 3023059054 ACIERTO DOMINGO C+NATIVIDAD LOKEN CLIFFORD 0 D+R ENTERPRISES 412 S 37TH ST 417 S 36TH ST 18107 157TH AVE NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 WOODINVILLE WA 98072 3023059055 3023059109 3023059110 BOSTICK MICHAEL S+PATRICIA FRARY LYNN R MD OBRIEN DANIEL N DR 411 S 36TH ST 3764 SW 171ST 400 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98166 RENTON WA 98055 3023059111 3123059026 3123059065 SPRINGBROOK ASSOCIATES ALLENBACH HERMAN M BRAIN W E PO BOX 53525 1018 SW 144TH 5454 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD SE BELLEVUE WA 98015 SEATTLE WA 98166 BELLEVUE WA 98006 3123059085 5070000010 5070000020 BRAIN W E AGOG SILVER D.+GRACE T GILLIAN ANNE LIVING TRUST 5454 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD SE 3621 SHATTUCK AVE S 3615 SHATTUCK AVE S BELLEVUE WA 98006 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 5070000030 5070000040 5070000050 PONDER THOMAS L KUMARAN RUDRA+SAVITRI BOSTICK HARRY G 3609 SHATTUCK AVE S 3603 SHATTUCK AVE S 3527 SHATTUCK AVE S ' RENTON WA 98055 ; RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 5070000140 5070000150 5070000160 SUNDQUIST JOANNE HILLMAN LAWRENCE D+NANCY L VICTOR B BLISS SHIRLEY 3620 SHATTUCK AVE S 400 S 37TH • 3604 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 5070000170 5070000180 7616800290 THOMAN STEPHANIE REMY JOHN I FRARY LYNN R 404 S 37TH ST 408 S 37TH ST 3764 SW 171ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98166 7616800300 7616800310 8558600030 VILLASISTA MARY VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER MATNEY CINDY C 9612 S 177TH ST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1332 E WALNUT RENTON WA 98055 400 S 43RD ST KENT WA 98031 RENTON WA 98055 r t ; 8558600035 8558600040 8558600070 LOVE BRUCE HIATT RONALD D JR+JOLENE M NAYLOR KERMIT D &NANCY J 3614 TALBOT RD S 17258 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH 3607 MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 8558600075 8558600080 8558600125 MAPLE FLOYD GILBERT LINDA E FOURNARAKIS NIKOLAOS 17249 98TH AVE S PO BOX 58244 4008 78TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98005 RENTON WA 98058 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 8558600130 8558600135 8558600140 EVANS TIMOTHY M AASHIEM WALLACE L GETTY MICHAEL G 17412 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH 17420 SPRINGBROOK RD 17405 98TH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 8558600145 8558600150 8558600155 ARNSON THOMAS C+NANCY L THOMPSON O'NEAL+EDNA L HWANG JACK J+SHIRLEY 17411 98TH AVE S 17419 98TH AVE S 516 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 8558600185 8558600190 8558600195 BATES VERLA M HILLIARD KATHLEEN R HILL VAUGHN L 9603 SOUTH 175TH STREET 9613 SOUTH 175TH STREET 9623 S 175TH RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 8558600200 8857670040 8857670050 PEDERSEN JAMES R&LARAE D VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL 521 S 38TH CT 400 S 43RD 400 S 43RD RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 8857670100 8857670100 8857670110 VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL 400 S 43RD 400 S 43RD 400 S 43RD RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 . • r -( _ - • . '- . alloTicE PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BRAIN REZONEILUA-96-I26,ECF,R DESCRIPTION: Proposed dly sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus,on the west side o1 Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use In the new CO Zone. No change of use Is contemplated as a consequence of this City Initiated rezone proposal. ' GENERAL LOCATION: 3901 Talbot Road South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Shod Plat _ I Conditional Use Permit XXX% Rezone _Site Plan Approval XXX%Environmental Review _Shorelineermit Conditional Use _Other , P _Fill 6 Grade Permit _Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit The date of Tuesday,Deeember 3,1996,a10:00 AM,has been set for a Rezone(R)public hearing to review the above- . referenced matter. The hearing,before Mr.Fred Kaufman,Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held In the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington. The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last dale of applicant's'Notice of Application'publication In the Valley Deily News. For further information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental • determinations,appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. 1•._• — 167 1 '. t- -� I ill h J2-8: R-8` :R 8 i_ . e s'Ah'-gr d Jh 1 }-5 _C.A— P-1 _i 1 Al -`', .. ` ..'r-- 1177th Ave. • 7 ..i. Yw.u. h w Qom&cl iflt R.,u `' • rw ,� S .. St. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. ,, CERTIFICATION I, JCLCALSQY't , hereby certify that-rtfl'ee. copies of the above document were posted by me in-114Y CG conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . OUVegOrAP 16.ici9 o . Signed: - rtUld- .Jail/ i 1)1 • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) - I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ',41tJDY . TAckQ ✓ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntar \., tVt r 146.•.uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Q„-�, .,•...Y. ,,1 Dated: %U /GJ LL✓.�f. / 0// • • : / Notary Public If nd for 117 State'-.)6vWak_,,i, -ton=' Notary (Print) '' '.lrA1Q&': ' . •Y , L. My appointment expires: - _7e, • NOTARY.DOC ,-,.* 11.,...1 PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BRAIN REZONE/LUA-96-126,ECF,R DESCRIPTION: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus,on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office (CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change, of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. GENERAL LOCATION: 3901 Talbot Road South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit XXXX Rezone Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other • Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The date of Tuesday,December 3,1996,at 9:00 AM,has been set for a Rezone(R)public hearing to review the above- referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington. . The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application"publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. - . -- - 167 1 a 3t R=$. • • • cc, - • a i. R-8 �' ..R-8.- . --. _ r - : . .�-._ -CO• :.Z, 361:h...Si e-v. •. .....tL: f1R B: `• .• S<97ti'Sf' ( , ;7t h UP-1 _CIA 41, �8f 1 1. i r st-1e .// r' • I I A� I ...__..-..... 0177th Ave. t• ( VALLEY rii- \ MEDICAL CENTER; I • CO 0 S 43rd St. ;-. • • PLEASE INCLUDE THEPROJECT>NUMBER,;WHEN;;CALLINGFOR;PROPERFILET:IDENTIFICATION'<`: >::, / • .S.omICES..t?I...I..St. .N.................................................................................................... I ::::::::::.:::.:.:::::::.:::::.:....::PRQ.PERT'::0................... ...).........,:...:�:.::.�:::.:::::::::::: ::.::...:................................................:.....:...:..:.:,:.::.::..:.:.::.:,::.,..:,.::.:.:::..:::.::.:.:.::...:.....:::. Note;:lf:;there::is morel.::than;o.ne legal;owneri:;please;;attach:;ara;additional:;: notariied::MasterrAppl't""caUort.for.::each.o:wner :... . PROJECT OR� DEVELOPMENT NAME. ��� ' , NAME: Ves ) p./ j2.. Lil.{ L Hi/jD�l-c% �� I !y/! =P0.Ut.Vw„ 'Load i) PROPERTY/ O 'ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: .64_.v �cr0 + -r / '1 1%41 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NU BER(S): CITY: / NMI I. ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND 3a5%D34' /f 509 gVo1 —219-1 G-SAL. G� W' PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: 1"- -- AV - � cK�� 7 rrA(_ COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ib'\•' 'C"c ADDRESS: Z AA,LL 7 t LIE ' PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): CITY: { (—tc:50g ZIP: cqei!c EXISTING ZONING: rvtuC- ( � G TELEPHONE NUMBER: PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): CEO nn V SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: V-2/4 • COMPANY(if applicable): oil PROJECT VALUE: kioN ADDRESS: AOKOIS THE SITE LOCATED I' 'MARE OTECTION AREA? ��/�--��^ OCT 1. 8 1996 CITY: • ZIP: IS THE SITE LOCATER f4k�1f y E INENG ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? CITY OF RENTON TELEPHONE NUMBER: (F7 ��-7- & �� 0 �0�1 /-fir . EG . ..DES.CFiI.P1 V :O.F..P.. O .. R...Y.. A fa.cri>::se .ar..a hee.tif:<:ne.cesar::.:::<:<::><::::><: .::>:<::::<:::> A-t"� GT EE., 'AL • • APPLIMAT > N>'&`FEE € € . >E E' >`:> »»> »»»> ::<:€> E€<:i> '::::i>: :::::: :: > <> >> > > >> ':>> `>Ch'etk:al[:;:;.;:;:<.;:.11'ca: lion>:.:::...,es a a P•::• t. ..st . .........).........................e.... .�. ..... ...... .......................... • —ANNEXATION .- .$ SUBDIVISION:, , COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $4 _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ • SPECIAL PERMIT . - . $ _SHORT-PLAT $' _TEMPORARY PERMIT. $ •, • . _TENTATIVE PLAT • $ .' _CONDITIONAL USE'PERMIT• ' . $ . — PRELIMINARY PLAT T_ $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL •• ' ' $ •. . •_FINAL PLAT $ GRADE& FILL PERMIT $ . • (NA. CU. YDS: ) . PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:" ' $ _ VARIANCE-. ' . ` . . •-$ • - _ (FROM SECTION: 1' _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL •' - • •�' . •• •. _WETLAND-PERMIT ,$ - - _ ROUTINE VEGETATION ' ` ' • MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS:- • .. • _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT . , $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ _}0__ — REVISION $ DVI `:.: F 'OWNE:RSHIP` > < > > < >< >'<> <> i;:..b<' "'E ' '<><>< > `: 'E< ` I, (Print Nam ) ' ,declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the- authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in and I for the State of residing at . - (Name of Owner/Representative) , on the_day of I 19 i (Signature Of Owner/Representative) . . , • 1 (Signature of Notary Public) .:....:.::E.?;:. ... ............. ....:......::........:....:::....:.:, .. ...... T Is;sec • �:: o:::be<: ete :::b ...Clt :.:Staff. :.:. .:...:.:..::;:::>::<>::>::: ..:..... >::«::.;::><:;:. :.:>: �::;: »�>' ` F'I IV'`m r: _..:..,;. '. A .;. ...; FiP`-�» :;' ?'; LLA;<'PP'>>1=P' '>T ;> > R :sR <MP»< .::> > ;<>: 's:: .' > C t I e... u be .. :: .>` « ..S S L CU .. ..... ....... . ....... .P.....S .:..... V .......V....... .... ... <.>:: A :.S :::: BS C A .FEES, : : ' :.>•;" ':<>'< ;::: :> `{ OTAB:. O;.;;TAG PROVIDED »; <<:::>•••::::>::': ::::`<::' ;:; ?•.•;:• - MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9196 3 -85903403 L0230590341 r BRAIN. WEUGENE. DDS i 5454 LK WASHINGTON BLVD SE ' BELLEVUE WA 98006 34 PARCEL A OF VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL - DR BRAIN RENTON SHORT PLAT NO 213-78 RECORDING NO 7812149018 SD PLAT DAF - POR NE 1/4 OF SEC 31-23-05 LY W OF • SPRINGBROOK RD E OF ST RD NO 167 & N OF S 43RD ST TGW POR SE 1/4 OF 30-23-05 LY W OF SPRINGBROOK RD E OF ST RD NO 167 & S OF FOLG DESC LN - BEG ON N/S C/L OF SD SEC 250 FT N OF S 1/4 COR SD SEC TH S 89-03-08 E PLT S LN SD SEC 1055 FT TH S 72-49-04 E TO W LN SPRINGBROOK RD & TERM SD LN LESS POR SD SEC 31 DESC AS FOLG - BEG INTSN OF W LN OF SPRINGBROOK RD WITH N LN OF SD SEC TH N 89-03-08 W 300 FT TH S 0-56-52 W 85 FT TH S 89-03-08 E 289 . 74 FT TO W LN SPRINGBROOK RD TH N 07-50-01 E 85. 62 FT TO POB LESS RD 312305906504 3123059065 BRAIN W E 5454 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD'`s BELLEVUE WA 98006 312305 65 N 75 FT OF E 200 FT OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LY W OF CO RD # 80 & MEAS ALG N LN OF SD SUBDIV 312305908500 3123059085 BRAIN W E 5454 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD ''aL BELLEVUE WA 98006 312305 85 N 85 FT OF POR OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LY WLY OF CO RD & E OF LN 300 FT W ,MEAS ALG N LN, OF WLY LN SD CO RD LESS N 75 FT OF E 200 FT ,MEAS ALG N LN, CA 0 s 3.2nd 'CITY OF RENTON .. . ZONING MAP 3t R-8 LEGEND RC Resource Conservation ccr (1) 1-8 R-1 Residential 1 du/ac C.) . . -C3 c1) R-8 R-8- 1 R-5 Residential 5 du/ac (24 rt ----1.-- 36th S I R-B Residential 8 du/ac 01.) Q.) ......, ...., . CZ-cill cl itY R-8 RMH Residential Manufactured Homes ›- • ••C4 C' S• 37 ,th St. 17th R—I0 Residential 10 du/ac R-14 Residential 24 du/ac P-1 u CA 1111 sa, RM—I Residential Multi-Family Infilt RM—N Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center e /y — ' PM-c Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center . ili, , ARN-0 Residential Multi-Family Urban Center ?177th Ave ,,. . I CC Convenience Commercial i P-1 ...._ ,... VALLEY e- I 4,7 \\:\ CN Center Neighborhood CS Center Suburban • C MEDICAL CENTER. .15 ; ,.4k, / 1),.;;.,,,---,\\ NT.' ' 0 , 14Z) \ss CD Center Downtown 1 1:, -,...,. .„. COR Center Office Residential Cb $>. . . / S.: CA Commercial Arterial O 0 S 43rd. St Lc 0 I , Commercial Office , 1 !mei expw morm....dim .''' 1H Industrial - Heavy IM Industrial - Medium (7; CO CO It Industrial - Light 4\ P-1 Public Use (P) Publicly Owned S 4+01. School P-1 WI C° CD(P) Renton City Limits 0 600 1200 milmml. . .......k.i...::: RM—I Y , 1 :7200 . C.)' ‘ -)44> • riff? + LONG RANGE PLANNING 1 P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES 08/02/96 r s 5331 I R-1 1 , l PR-14 Dr. Eugene Brain - 3901 Talbot Road S. Proposal Description for Five Private Rezones from P-1 to CO Zone In 1994 the Renton City Council authorized the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to proceed with the assimilation of those sites currently zoned Public Use (P-1) into Renton's other 21 zones. The need for this zone had been lessened by the City's 1993 Interim Zoning Code which included a number of new zones, most of which provided for most, if not all, of the uses previously allowed in the P-1 Zone. Also, analysis revealed that there had been a great deal of inconsistency in the application of the P-1 Zone over the years in that many public uses were not zoned P-1, having been adequately accommodated in the prevailing zones where they were located. Other reasons for changing the zoning were that the City had recently adopted new provisions providing greater development flexibility for community facilities as well as a an early notification process for all publicly owned properties whenever there was a change in ownership, use, or major tenancy. In 1995 the City Council approved the first of the P-1 rezones to other zones, approving nine publicly sponsored private P-1 rezones. The current proposal is a continuation of the P-1 rezoning process begun in the fall of 1995. It involves City initiated rezoning of five (5) privately held P-1 zoned parcels located immediately north of Valley Medical Center, near the intersection of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South. The five sites in question are designated Center Institution on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. All five of the current batch of privately owned P-1 zoned parcels are proposed to be rezoned to the Commercial Office (CO) Zone. Vicinity maps and legal descriptions for each site have been provided as part of the Master Application. Proposal Summary for Five Private P-1 Rezones It is the City's intent to phase out and eventually eliminate all of its current P-1 zoned properties by assigning other nearby zones that currently accommodate these uses or which can be easily amended to accommodate these uses are in place. The subject proposal is to rezone five(5)privately held properties located immediately north of Valley Medical Center near the intersection of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road S., (all on the west side of Talbot Road S.), from the Public Use(P-1)Zone to the Commercial Office(CO)Zone. The subject proposal, a legislative act, is considered to be a non-project action under the provisions of WAC 197- 11, SEPA Rules. Subsequent development proposals on these five(5) sites would be considered project actions. An Environmental Checklist has been prepared for the proposed rezoning of these five privately held, P-1 zoned sites to the CO Zone. RECEIVED , OCT 1. 6 1996 5RZNSMRY.DOC/ DEVELOHMcN r PLANNING CITY OF RENTON • • PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: • This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. _ You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your • answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions(actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Public (P-1) Zone rezones of five privately held parcels around S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South. 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Michael D. Kattermann EC VED City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 ®�� 1996 206-277-6190 4. Date checklist prepared: DEVELOPY�Et�T PLANNING crry OF RE�TOPI October 14, 1996 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services Division 96PRSEPA.DOC ..A City of Renton Environmental a klist Fi( 'aivate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 - Page 2 of 13 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): The City Council is expected to review the proposed action in October or November, 1996. -- 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. This is a non-project action. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. DEIS for the adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Jan. 16, 1992; FEIS for City's Comprehensive Plan, Feb. 1, 1993; and, SEIS for City's Comprehensive Plan, Dec. 1994. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Not applicable,this is a non-project action. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Renton City Council will need to approve the proposed zoning reclassifications of the five subject parcels. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and-site. The proposed non-project action is a proposal to rezone five privately held parcels north of Valley Medical Center in the vicinity of S. 38th Court from P-1 zoning to CO zoning. Before these rezones can be finalized amendments to the CO Zone are required to make retirement residences a permitted secondary use in this zone. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. File# Names of Owners &Addresses File# Names of Owners&Addresses PR-10 Lynn Frary, M.D. PR-13 Springbrook Associates 3711 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 403 S. 38th Court; Renton, 98055 PR-11 Dr. Daniel Obrien PR-14 Dr. Eugene Brain 400 S. 38th Court; Renton, 98055 3901 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 PR-12 D & R Enterprises 3731 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other - The proposed rezone of the five subject parcels in the vicinity of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South to the CO Zone are located on relatively flat land. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Ch_ c Fivek Jo P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 -' Page 3 of 13 c. What general types of soils are found on the.site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and • by themselves result in any development. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. - g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held - parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental IX ,,,dist Fi, ivate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 4 of 13 Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of.and by themselves result in any development. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These • rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the -CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate•quantities if - known._ - - - — -- - Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and • approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action. c. Water Runoff(including storm wafer): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Ch', t . . Five; ;ate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 5 of 13 Where will this water flow?• Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a legislative, non-project action and therefore will not have development associated impacts. See above. 2) Could 'waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. See above. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not applicable. The proposed action does not include a specific site or development proposal. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current non-project action. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action. N/A deciduous tree:alder, maple,aspen, other - N/A evergreen tree:fir, cedar,pine, other N/A 'shrubs N/A grass N/A pasture N/A crop or grain N/A wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other N/A water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other N/A other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is.not applicable to the current non-project action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project action. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not applicable.at this time. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site:, • Not applicable at this time. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental C; gist Fiv4 ;vate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 6 of 13 will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current non-project proposal. Birds:hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other N/A Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other N/A Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other N/A b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No known threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the subject rezone sites. However, at the time of subsequent development this issue would be appropriately addressed. Since the current proposal is considered to be a non-project action analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable. - c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project proposal. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:- Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to'the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by-themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,•etc. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current proposal. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. • 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Since the uses allowed under the proposed new zoning are not expected to have any greater need for public services than the uses allowed under existing zoning analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton.`Environmental Cit. Est FivE; safe P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 7 of 13 2) ' Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development.- Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project proposal. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the proposal. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning-five • privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project proposal. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impacts, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current proposal. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves - result in any development. The subjects sites of this rezone are typically vacant or used for medical related uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not applicable.;The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Describe any structures on the site. Not applicable. Whereas there are structures on some of the five rezone sites, the subject proposal to rezone these sites is a non-project action. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development.. See above. d Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? . Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in' any development. . Therefore, no demolition is anticipated as a result of the proposed action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? These five privately held parcels are currently zoned Public Use (P-1) Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Cr :ist Fiv, vate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 8 of 13 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the five rezone sites is Center Institution. N g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element,of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, If any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not 'applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. The CO Zone allows building heights of 250 feet on sites 25,000 sq. ft. or larger. Since the maximum height in the P-1 Zone is 50 feet (without special development provisions)taller structures than in the P-1 Zone could occur. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action that will rezone properties to a zone that allows greater building height, but reduced lot coverage over existing zoning. Increased building heights might obstruct more views from upland properties than under the provisions of the current P-1 zoning. On the other hand, decreased lot coverage and good'site plan review might create view corridors below 50 feet in height that might not otherwise have been provided. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Che' Five! `:te P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 9 of 13 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Since these rezones are considered to be a non-project action view impacts cannot be fully assessed until specific project actions are developed. Site plan review and SEPA disclosure at the time.of future development would allow view impacts, if any, to be assessed and mitigation measures proposed where appropriate. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of.the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 96PRSEPA.DOC . City of Renton Environmental3, klist F_" rivate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 10 of 13 Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. d. Will the proposal require any`new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water,rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, mitigation measures are not required for these non- project actions. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. See above. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at"the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 96PRSEPA.DOC - City of Renton-Environmental CI' ;st Fivi, rate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 �' Page 11 of 13 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this-checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of fu di I u e Proponent: Name Printed: i G .1 0. Date: , 10-`--/7. 96PRSEPA.DOC . I ' City of Renton Environmental ilist Fii,,_ ivate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 12 of 13 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should onlybe used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. (a) How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;production,storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in an increased discharge to water, emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise.- (b) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Not applicable. - -- 2. (a) How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? - - The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in impacts to plants, animals, fish, and marine life. (b) Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of plants, animals fish or marine life. 3. (a) How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed non-project action is a legislative act pertaining to the zoning designation on five existing site. This action, if approved, will not result in any development by itself. individual project actions will be required to comply with the SEPA Rules. Therefore, the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of energy or natural resources. (b) Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of energy or natural resources. 4. (a) How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study) for governmental protection;such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains,-or prime farmlands? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in impacts to environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands. (b) Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. See above. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental CI, gist Fiv' )ate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 13 of 13 5. (a) How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses , incompatible with existing plans? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal that would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. (b) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. See above. 6. (a) How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? _ The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in increased demands on transportation, public services and utilities. (b) Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not applicable. See above. 7. (a) Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local,state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful tack of II isc r on m art_ Proponent: Name Printed: r. Date: Q -1 9,6 96PRSEPA.DOC - i 1 _ ___) en _' ° E K PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be _ done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required." INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: • This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. • You must answer each_question accurately and.carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does.not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. if you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts.of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions(actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Public (P-1) Zone rezones of five privately held parcels around S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South. 2. Name of applicant: - City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Michael D. Kattermann City of Renton • 200 Mill Avenue • Renton, Washington 98055 • 206-277-6190 • 4. Date checklist prepared: October 14, 1996 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services Division • 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental C gist Five Nate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 2 of 13 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): The City Council is expected to review the proposed action in October or November, 1996. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. This is a non-project action. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. DEIS for the adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Jan. 16, 1992; FEIS for City's Comprehensive Plan, Feb. 1, 1993; and, SEIS for City's Comprehensive Plan, Dec. 1994. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Not applicable,this is a non-project action. 10. List,any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Renton City Council will need to approve the proposed.zoning reclassifications of the five subject parcels. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed non-project action is a proposal to rezone five privately held parcels north of Valley Medical Center in the vicinity of S. 38th Court from P-1 zoning to CO zoning. Before these rezones can be finalized amendments to the CO Zone are required to make retirement residences a permitted secondary use in this zone. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. File# Names of Owners 8 Addresses File# Names of Owners 8 Addresses PR-10 Lynn Frary, M.D. PR-13 Springbrook Associates 3711 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 403 S. 38th Court; Renton, 98055 .PR-11 Dr. Daniel Obrien PR-14 Dr. Eugene Brain 400 S. 38th Court; Renton, 98055 3901 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 PR-12 D & R Enterprises 3731 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes; mountainous, other The proposed rezone of the five subject parcels in the vicinity of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South to the CO Zone are located on relatively flat land. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Chi t Fivei ,ate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 3 of 13 c. What general types of soils are found on the.site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. - - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. f. Could-erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and • by themselves result in any development. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. . No. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental C. ;list Five, :'vate P-1 Rezones to-CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 4 of"13 Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be • placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result'in any development. ' 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 6) Does the proposal Involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. • Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Ground Water. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action.- �' 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Chit Five; ;!ate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 5 of 13 Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a legislative, non-project action and therefore will not have development associated impacts. See - above. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. See above. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: _ Not applicable. The proposed action does not include a specific site or development proposal. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current non-project action. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Not applicable. The-proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the _ environment is not applicable to this non-project action. N/A deciduous tree:alder, maple, aspen, other N/A evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other • N/A shrubs N/A grass N/A pasture N/A crop or grain N/A wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other N/A water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other N/A other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current non-project action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project action. d.. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not applicable at this time. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Not applicable at this time. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Ch., >f FivE.. _!ate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 6 of 13 will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current non-project-- proposal. Birds:hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other N/A Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other N/A Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other N/A b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No known threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the subject rezone sites. However, at the time of subsequent development this issue would be appropriately addressed. Since the current proposal is considered to be a non-project action analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project proposal. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and - -- by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL.RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current proposal. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy I. impacts, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five • privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Since the uses allowed under the proposed new zoning are not expected to have any greater need for public services than the uses allowed under existing zoning analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Ch' ,t Five• ate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 7 of 13 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project proposal. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the proposal. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning.-five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project proposal. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impacts, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These ' rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current proposal. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. The subjects sites of this rezone are typically vacant or used for medical related uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Describe any structures on the site. Not applicable. Whereas there are structures on some of the five rezone sites, the subject proposal to rezone these sites is a non-project action. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. See above. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels;from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, no demolition is anticipated as a result of the proposed action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? These five privately held parcels are currently zoned Public Use (P-1) Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. • 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental 0 `:gist Fig.` !Irate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 8 of 13 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the five rezone sites is Center Institution. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?- Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. j. . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. Therefore, -analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. The CO Zone allows building heights of 250 feet on sites 25,000 sq. ft. or larger. Since the maximum height in the P-1 Zone is 50 feet (without special development provisions)taller structures than in the P-1 Zone could occur. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action that will rezone properties to a zone that allows greater building height, but reduced lot coverage over existing zoning. Increased building heights might obstruct more views from upland properties than under the provisions of the current P-1 zoning. On the other hand, decreased lot coverage and good site plan review might create view corridors below 50 feet in height that might not otherwise have been provided. 96PRSEPA.00C City of Renton Environmental Ch; >t Fiv(, !ate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 9 of 13 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Since these rezones are considered to be a non-project action view impacts cannot be fully assessed until specific project actions are developed. Site plan review and SEPA disclosure at the time of future development would allow view impacts, if any, to be assessed and mitigation measures proposed where appropriate. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a.. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not _ applicable to the proposal. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. _ What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not.applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not.applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental(n ',list Fir, jvate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 10 of 13 Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. d. Will,the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or.private? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not • applicable to the proposal. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of) wafer,rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. - Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, mitigation measures are not required for these non- project actions. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection, health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO.Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. See above. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer,septic system, other. Not applicable:'The subject proposal is a non-project action. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. • 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Ch 3t Flay date P-4 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 `` Page 11.of 13 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of .non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of fu di I u e Proponent: Name Printed: /1 i .1 0. 0 ^m4 n r1 Date: • • • 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental i, f list FL. 'Nate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 _ Page 12 of 13 D. SUPPLEMENTAL.SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. (a) How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;production,storage, or release of toxic or hazardous _ substances; or production of noise? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in an increased discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. (b) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Not applicable. 2. (a) How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? - ..The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in impacts to plants, animals, fish, and marine life. (b) Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of • plants, animals fish or marine life. 3. (a) How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed non-project action is a legislative act pertaining to the zoning designation on five existing site. This action, if approved, will not result in any development by itself. Individual project actions will be required to comply with the SEPA Rules. Therefore, the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of energy or natural resources. (b) Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of energy or natural resources. 4. (a) How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study) for governmental protection;such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed non-project.action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in impacts to environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands. (b) Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. See above. 96PRSEPA.DOC - • City of Renton'Environmental C jist Fives wale P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 13 of 13 5. (a) How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal that would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. (b) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable: See above. 6. (a) How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in increased demands on transportation, public services and utilities. (b) Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not applicable. See above. 7. (a) identify, If possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local,state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not conflict with local, state, or federal • laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willfulul tack of II isc� ur on m Proponent: _0744— Name Printed: •.r-� Date: 96PRSEPA.DOC • •3 Oa• 4 c1 /,4-.7• +r�.r.• '� . '4•. i : . e - t\ t� It-M :° •xe*ii� 4 �fti, nw�: \�B?•6�y ... .-.o •••>s •09e ��v �23K�' - iss G, h _, Y ,•(•, p w�se. ••axis ,,` .:•.. ., o 1, 'x .. v�,'. '7"� - •• •ez-es_.r rir �i •es_'wt! �O . p ••, % . • '`ezze. :oftt:. • .:SS,'ao:e`�—�__ 7. 4,229//4T N • F • S,'a as O .. ry, ° Ac. �e v p 7 4 s 4 iAo • �0 s 641. n ' ae9B -. ,'©s S3 N' •• 55,4c. �0 h li • 0(SC-.k •4./4, .. . . , . .. .., No /6 t , 0 0 y , h •0 / 11x0^ Oi ,a.1 0t60 •. /T • '/9. by N •.26/11 I il o n lJ� © • .0 i4-4- ro ' °.6��E�M� tf 7r ce ptb0 ^ 2 7e• 0��0 • k in AL/to 0y . Q Rs Lor2 �' t- .wc� , y(:, ;t♦ .. LOT/ 1 ,t' \`ti toT 4 J M ® LR P. M. 9,2/O I ww pt h I i 0 .I ' _ t /a0•‘, • 1 2 Lord • V J 03.os.of p. 3 • /I,J S • 13-78- 7812149018 o4r ._. .,,„ o �' 'I sk ` K 37 ^1 tip^J oe.c. arm • d3,6t �L. �- PCL C PCL. A • om5. a �, -'O ot9 9 v.y,.5 p¢,r , c- ° ho 30 to $ , Ctq -30-.''� -rj s��N 0 3. n ;•„ Bci.zs1. c Aqr�- '.F .✓e0-vs-eew. 3eo 4 7,2L/•?3� 7. B6/.E5 •1 /00 2� • LIE-4 31-23--6 + • I, il • h� - 4t0 ,fi �100 • - _ 1 e� O 3� .--03.4§- ' - 4 W ' • ' ` . N ' PCL. B per' [[ `t 1°a101 kltl ,__ 78.6/ � Bi \ 0 ta. 3( 2,/ 30 ry • 29 ti ,, t- 0 q b ejj t S 177 it: IA589-02-46G 4l ' M -T., /03-98 7 .0,0Ng 0s $ 8 ��J n h qi_� ��D EXHIBIT` 3'.-. • EXHIBIT 13' PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT (JUNE 6, 1994) • PUBLIC USE ZONE REVISIONS (Referred 5/24/94) The Committee recommends that staff proceed with the assimilation of the P-1 Zone into existing zones. The Committee also recommends that staff continue to work with all interested parties to address concerns of the Planning Commission and the Planning and Development Committee related to preserving the public trust and revising the development standards related to these uses. • This action will allow staff to proceed in a timely manner with amendments to the Comprehensive Plan related to these public uses. The Committee will continue to work with staff on the remaining issues and report back to City Council prior to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments. The Committee recommends City Council concur in this report. 47e. • Kathy Keg er-Wheeler, Chair • Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair • • R dy Corman, em er • • • • pdco«nroc EXHIBIT 'C' 1P-S I . \ \ --g i > bk. • • Li „p„,....4, , . . . , ow A.aiemriRmembl . . .4" ,aliiin • p. r-. .....„ ,-,5 wo An iiria 1&L&I _ frd th S -� "� 1!!!11an I . I 1? • P-f , I, 41 t .. fir p.. 1 . IF f,...:;.. Cl A______ , I ._ . . . ( 4*1 172th .. Av SE . . . _ 1 A. 0 . . . •• 1 P� i 0 p‹, 00 oith _ ' , ,, /_,-Si • , LONG RANGE PLANNING ACTION FILE #96- 126 Y WO" 7 M 1996 `` REZONES FILE #PR-14 o 300 soo FROM P-1 T,0 CO :.::.::- :......,.;:....>::.:: :.:::.: -- REZONE SITE 1 :3600• CITY LIMITS • r:..:..-,...:.:..:.,.:...:....n-{'::::.::•..,?.:,•}'::;.:.;..:•:.,.:•...:.::::::...;.:.... ......:: :-.:::.. :.. ,...,.:.:.,.:..t..r::::.:....::.,•::.,..:r::.rr..:.•n. ...v.: \ .W.v {a..:..r n .. •n4 .t}:......, r. .r,r\• vv .. .r. .n.. .+1,....f...v. ':•.v-„•-. .:}. '•}:•.:v .. :.. Y•v.:v,•:•;{r{:•�}•aY.;{.vvti?•:{•:..;.;...y:.}v::....::.....x:•:.v4. .)188. :::r v:: :vxv;; :.4,J�ir.v.{.,}, ,t{3v. :t,.;r T a.:+ n w.,,},{. t.$}:••:}., ..~. t:'k•},..,�,-.. }:;a+'t : .2' £4'• v.?. .trh+••xkr:� �aJ:..:...,5..:n..:r•.: • .v ..n ....J. t*YS+r,••: .\ ti3Jrn, ^a.�.,k^�, ..vf:r .. }.'•••: ,+: �::.;.r ..;;C;, .r.;..,{ ., .{ ; tr.:; ...,,,.... {. ..;r .}.,. ,. �••..y; ». •.;,.. .. . .r.�{�,• r?..: . i'ii�J .S^�';.v,..r;,cY:,tk,?.•::i.•.r ?�,Y.. :f};;:; t}, ,.:.? ✓:vr.... .i.,.;4. .. •} r •..: •. }• }.. ..,. G :..:n ... t.}}fi. ,k ,}�• ;�:tk, :.k4r. v ai., fi. h'' r k: } R };T,f .Y .5 ..yty}:;;::!R:k }.< :i '~}%it '. ry.+n:•,`. <�Y r -f� t, .y.... r: , ' thrnt �:r ; �� � r., . v?v ' v � `T•'r ' � t + :'kx ' ' � '..r r f. HV?•4}v .{ ,Jr 'k:t r..} ..:. r }i.,,..r v} }.}\..Cv.. k r ^hy.} Q}: .'.. f -{;.;.?.+•n-:n?„�'..:n. /..rnb .r:. .:.n„ r ..... :.t£.l1 ....v �// }vR•n\v. n �.x ..1....v. .,.`.. .•.. .x.n ....:.n v.n .Y.?.r. .. n......) ... .. .. n r .:.:. :-. :?vT•T.:...t. :•ax.•.�:•;^'`: `?h}t t;r:.;n,..} a:xr' .+.r.,:: .....:.... n..fires....n n :rt.....F..rn.{t Tarr.:`Sr..rrS., }p,•. •rrr::r?+•.:.....:. : : .r:;, Q.,Y fi..;n. ,?•;r}.....•: .G:. . :n. ;.:h,"••r•:C•#;{ r.r... ..:T......s ..✓.f t r~.r.,c. f. ..r. .'+tC. ...r•: > w` •{•?�}'kr: :•+S;t}R.;fi •nkc .r. :ro:... .R'< :t•\ •... ..3�. .,rr.,r,- .x rr..rr.:�v: rJ:�u.ftY{C}-3z.^t. �t . .:: :..w�.. ��E'n�.}.. : +; r .yti .•-.\• •}:f. c. }�):+�+ i}n?}:l.•:!:ra::{tnv.,++•i:v::r Fffrr n, r 4 v}.v?. •}r••r? A i v7•'fi- �:• :K-'?r.}:.y}• .,,...\-•., }y{}" .:..v 4.},r.r.•x.. .n .. ...{{?�' tn:v:...n,,:.. .::.......... ...n:,•:.!n•:.:}:a.:+v, r, x+'rt. r .v •:v.. .J.` x r ., -::.::,T•.`•; •:.rr: ''r••... '{'y' •+ \.i .Y.':N Y3'?' :ir:t ,.Y,.• I n,,-r';}t Y'.t { Y. . •:.•. ....r:...:! ..,t.. tr•.. k: .4k.:...t:.t.gq��.� :,• .,•.r n: .:• »`a•r. ....s+,n a.�r. f •}: ..£ :.•ti.;rk.,,....:.+xt• .k� .k• .C�.,x.:�• ••:3•.t. .rr.•.•..r:.tC.•..J.yT.:�::;,• :n ;.,•t•: ..C�'.,rn :.?•:•::Y •::�4„•:::xnt•:zn•:;},•.. C C . ? F. �, n •.S.k {,v. . h.,r n:.. .rX v. v tit: t{?r . b..:w{.,.. v f„ #Y•:.,. v. .. v. {,,,.;:Jyfi?{«,..f..;t Lr:: ......:... �....... ... ..trr�:•r SG'• •.• 4t•}:`k•r.: f?r..n .t.t++.t?k.7: R: ?• +. �a:�:kkkYt4�ar..,t. v .. rr::v::vrr .v ,r ..�fkn h,�. .r ..c r.S... :\. .}.4:S.. v.f•....v....k �:%3:..r.. n}.. k •:nT::r}.�.t.,.::},:,t{v��.;;;rf.:r�rr:. �•J.ti`, t?k•:Sx:vn•::-:.,W•: tS:.@r: . `.� � ,3.. �.. .f .�f•• .T{ f�.��• •..v. r;S.if.�^; .,��...3�4'3',-..n ;•Y,::;•xtt•:•.. ::##2•.t,•,•„5•t:::.}f.+:. }-{.{1;�. -:rrr•;-}.. /.' ..:r.:.t.. ...... .r.. .. xt ... t .!t:•}. .n .... ti. .... .vfia},-ar x K .r?`n'k-• �RiN., .{.?:•: nr. :.I.,a T.,?•• rrr}, .Yr .'•Y s}... r.yr t }.r.r... 1• • 3..:: ..Y....r.4:.,..t:nk.. :.�°}�2:: ..\,..:C. ..2, .� ,..h .tt •}}}r •}: .3�+t .1;•rfh .}a:... ?: t.. �•:f• ^r .4rv:-.t•..}:,••:}.,...t...:. , ..t....+:•::r+};x,v:;.,sv:u.}:}.•..........a : }:•}.-'S:s 3} ,.. „.f?Y•... r,}.n {:.. .ra •`:% :.4:r•:i>.rJ`:}:••,�rfyy4•:•r ..d:•r:�n• •.:•:}}+:.n R............t•t•::}:�•. •.„•�... .: }..n. .:.:r .}...+. .. ..v.. : ,. { ..:. 3...'a.... .:'t-.•t:.,}•::•,..:`•.'{: n nL t .}.t•n•�'a•�z t,•::rr .}.;.�•: •+z .r�x•.., r..*r.T^r x .�:•In,.ti ..}.,... .,n;#. }..n..n...rnt x} .r.,. �. : SS k`xw. .O1 : .k. w r a ., ,...tt nf,.},.,,..3+c }.n:.?}.!• S' Jt.rr.r{.3R. ,r3.,.;.. ..r..r rt). . .:t.,F;• .:rr•}Y.r^•.{:. :..r::ti�•.v+:::::}.;.;t...+......t,•:..An..,}.5.......r....r .:,�?r:+c::,•:.t,...J.a}....,-{..�....+.rk* ..n.. k.... k• .....,n,. k, •+Y�}„Kz£; ?rt•}Rrk-x•::.Y. :.J.r •:#:.:..t:•A,+.r r .. ...C..,......+n.t.......:..n..£h...,,..:.. ..,.....t..,rJ.....£............,.....r...{.... ..nJ.vR. ...T ..#k O..G. .,....:.T,,.v •`•3+}.. .,.r: t na.r...,•r....sou.•}.:.s .}5?.,n .,tirr.,v:rr{. ::�::� : r n•JJ.,....... .}.•:...,.;..}•..:...+�'�•:n... ..tt t.,r..............................:............r.,t.:..t...,.t..:....r.:........n..:.......r...,....}..S ........,..�.tt,. ,C•. ..?.yr.t..r.. .:.. C:`� •rS>:.: r... L::,. }..r.... 4 3t. •n•;v.. ..r n:•nn•}:r.. > ,nr}.t.... ...:..........: ... ........ ... .. ....+ .. ........... ,............. .,.:.a n....t w,Q,...+r.}n:9r k�:w..�. r..t.�crt•....t •+....,•:..,•r.r.......r.}�rT•.• •::::r:r :rr.•xu•:::r.'/rt.t::;+R• p� .x1�:.. ... .... ,.;.... .+ ........ry...v........: . ... n.A �./....nnv.\:n.....n. .�........v..':h.;:'f...f.{v ;}.}.f:tv......,.4.....n?.n:n............n...{k.r:•.i.......4}t •}:•:i.......}.{.....T'.:.?.'.. ..v:f:}:•:4??t{.}::.{.4ii}i}::4•:::::::^:i:?:vvWt t.�'SkfvYr'.}}v.>�:::. • .•:}}r}}Y•�::.::.::::: .:::::::::::::::: ::. :::::::::: :•:{{J}:};}; :::.}v.:}::.;}}}:i4;::.}:?•}}}}:•}}}}i}: J}}}:} ,.... ;,,;::!•:5:'} }}}Yh:•:a}}:.Yn}:}n}:{:ir:rYr}}:•}4i}}i:•}Yi: :?::::}}}+}}i}:{r:::'•'i•:rr'•}:•}:�:}:::}:r}:r}}:+h}i:??4}}}}i;}}}}}J}y}}}'-}}}:r;.}}}'?r:r••}:•}}+::':}}}:}:.: .... v::.::::::::::::::::::::::::.v::::•.:v::•.v::•:::.V:::::..•;.•; .:':?:•}} }'.S•}:..:;..,.•Y........................ ......:.•.:.:.n............. .t,.r ...r......x..v rx.,{.......v...n....... .., .....n...... ....+....n...n............. ...... .. ................... .........:......,.....:.. . ...n... ............ .. ,:.:....v.t.t...r..n...................+.......r.. , t }. ...v........... . :.....,...::............v...........n...n.n......x:0}}:?tir}:r;{•:??+?r;{•} ..... ............... .....n.......,... ......v r.......rt........r.r... .......v............:...... .,........n..nf.. ....n n:.V. v w::::.:........ ..v..........v.... ..........r......................................................v..n..................v...........v.+............ ,...........:..5..\...r....,k}..r. :n.v. , r.Yv ..... :....... .....,.... .. ....:i..nv...v....v.....{..............v..........v............r .....w;.:.:.;..;......,,.... ...1•::..:. ...... r.v?•:..V::.v::::::x:::nvv:::.V:::::::n:t:?•:nv:.........................................r........,....r........,............ .........r.....ct.tt...t..,../.r................ .. ........ ,. .. ..,r?...k. ,. .............r.....{..:.,.... r. ..t:...;;..;.t;...;......t.............,.n.....tt.....:...n•..:.::•.:.{.:r::..:::.:.v..,•..:::.:Y:•:::t,t•::4•::::?at:+:•:::.v:::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::.v:::::::: ': v }i •}•:' ?%: .'•}' i:r. .:.. � ::nw:}::::::.w:.:v::....r..vv x::::{r::::{r:.:,• ....v:1v .:.J.... .S...t.{.:............ .:.:•.:::?•.v.t•,••.t.x.....,:'�:. :. :..•}? •i}}:::,:;�:?r;:%:::•:£kk�?£�:kkk?`viii::}:j}}:•}}}:yk+t?z::y:•S::k�\.r. .�'•r... n..\..:... -:fire::•%•}}::::nV. .......rr..�.t.r. t✓Q.r.......M.M�RQf.AI»a� O .. ...........,.t..,t:::�:?:..�:.�}}::::n.:.:?.:::.,.•;:>:>}�:;':>•:>:<:::<:<:>n?...n.:r::r.:.::::. t...vv.??r:{?.. r..........,tv::::::-.vJ.+•:::::::W:fw:•:}:: w..v.:v.v::::.v:n. ... .. v.....v ......n................................. ...v{{{::::{:.}•:::;::nv::•:r:::r:.V::xn..........:::::w::::::::: .. .........................t..............r............ :............r..... ,. trn ........... .. ,n ... \t.xn..nv..} ......�:::....................::w•:....:.:...........x::::::w:}::::. n..... ,....:.;...n......,.....................r......v n........ r............r..................n....v.............. \.............,_.....:.:.......:...�.:v.n::x:.}w:n.. .........................................................n............e..........rn.....v.......,.n..............v...........................................:n::w::.v::::.{.::.v:.v:::n•:.::v::::�?:w}::::... .. Government buildings such as schools, hospitals, libraries; Offices: administrative/headquarters; professional; Business Park and Ride lots; Municipal utility (facilities; Municipal Serivces; general; Business and professional schools, Airports; etc. business services; existing neighborhood, community, and regional parks;trails, and open spaces; existing public and -L private elementary and secondary schools/portables existing as 1,- of June 7, 1993(site plan review for expansions less than 10%); theaters; utilities, small; existing use designations(see . code for complete explanation 43-31-16.h) • STREET SETBACKS STREET SETBACKS Arterial (major/secondary) .30 feet Street Setback front 15 feet Arterial Collector 25 feet Street Setback 25 feet or less(15-30) feet Moderate Density Residential 20 feet 25-80 feet (15-25) feet All others 20 feet over 80 feet (30-50) feet Rear/Side none required RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS(from abutting lots designated residential) RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS(from abutting lots designated residential) Low Density Residential 50 feet Not Applicable . • Moderate Density Residential 20 feet MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT Public Buildings 50 feet* General 250 feet (bonuses up to 50 feet exist Public and Private Utilities 20 feet for additional amenities) Residential Adjacency 20 feet over residential max. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE . MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE No limit other than established by yards. 65% of the total lot area td • 75% if parking is provided within the building • * 75 feet permitted subject to specified provisions,such as increased setbacks,sloped roofs,etc. • \" CIT`—. OF RENTON sal Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 21, 1996 Dr. Eugene Brain, DDS 5454 Lake Washington Blvd. SE Sec If�aS"t^CJf 0►��1C14v1 •f Or" Bellevue, WA 98006 C Q—% ° of uVes SUBJECT: Brain Rezone Project No. LUA-96-126,R Dear Property Owner: The date of Tuesday, December 03, 1996, at 9:00 a.m., has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced rezone. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you prefer to make other arrangements to receive the staff report, please contact Karen Codiga, 277-5582, or Sandi Seeger, 277- 5581. If you have any questions, please call me at 277-6181. Sincerely, T(Mbris t ' '1 Donald K. Erickson,AICP Project Manager HEXLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 el This paper contains 50°.,recycled material,20°°post consumer ..r..»:rr...h:y.... ......:..:: ::.n.rr.•:::v.v:.n•::::::.:vr. n::•:r v:.v'•i)i i•}}i}}:}:}:=•i}}:?•�}: :' ...:»::.}:}.ii:•fh:.::4}:•+:.•::•,v.• r:F.:.:iX{:.:{-• {ir} i':Yi'l//'i}%-:LF-::.e +;,t,..:r4rf: ..f:: n.£::}.,f::%%;{{v•:Cr•x -•.{ viY / ::X.: {•}feiji}Y}}:+•ii::n ..?r nFA. ::?•ti:i}r'{:::.::}}}?i}:': .+f. .'9 ?C^•'--?:-:r .f:.?rv}..4r. ;�:.:.}:..... ?;':!i'-vi::% •r:� : :?�•}m:�} ,Yeyy��. !Y;.I, :.?.::r.:{r..».....v.. r.}:: ..N-.r?i::.•ri::.v:v:•..xnr::, ..4}Y....Y{.!X».::?:.,rt.+•:: .4.0-::}YFY� h. ?.'xr ..{:..:{,»:::: }Y:4:vi•. ...:J. O�+?::?'::.'•:•.r•+v:?iv.}?•:v•:.;hr n...:yi•• mK .•Y� /f. .�:: :v/r.. '�},:::.:.w:r». r-:.x.•f.:'•}.<}v.}'}}}}Y>... � T. :,..}:r{? .:,•::'�'Y:<f;%%;r.,.?^X ,f{: . ...:::::::::::..:. ..:.r. ..{r?•{{.....:... ..rn^:4Yr S:?.:5+%f.•'?%J?rr:?.::..f......SS::{!•F,::: „r::rw`v�F}i:::;i::iv,Y4..:..:.}..r{r{.::.:i�}:%•}:..?F.f 4:f�'�i::..:..f..$..:.4.v.../. :?. n}!•Yv� •};. {{}:4;:/A.v/.•:r.:.}:::.':Y�r:1:?}•',?.i;'.':?::{•?:-XS:�}:{.}: •:.:n..r.:.:•.r.:r}:..; •. .. ..; ; .r..: . �:• �:Yrr., .. ..:...:: :. v '..r::.;.r:.v{a.;;{{{:{{{?:G::.i.r:::�•»:-•».✓:»n;?? :::S;r'{.Xr.;fr:::r;. 4..:;i::^•;:?�:`.ti:{..?YS�: .-:i•Y:='-.••:S''ry � :::F+rfy,»:»r.i.::�?.:?:i :.'f..Y:??:'ri%{{n r.X^..; r.?•rfS.:f.-:?»ii•/.;.:f,.: : iF'�r-{.4 ,, . :<: ;"%?•ri?..;'4,.,::...x.:..:..Fr.. ::<.:%},,:::.:t:.�:.X:,:"'.0 ' NT> PNVI G`'} IV(SIC3N:': ::,..:.,h;.-.. : foi r.,� .F ,:{?.vY.,.?:.{�.,:::•>,�.:''. �. .r.,,:...:URRr=. :P N. ..D.. ..,.. ,.,�».f{:-r. r. .'.:�' :y.r•.:. - / .rS,G-Y. r!��.:nf:.:?46 +• /;': ,'d •:%�;£4�<%%x,.•f%a' .r.:4....{ r1rc,r -`yN:%: rr.::, r:./.4� rh).' •::j;}fn•..r.a...{ .:y:rr,it.�Y:YS`:{4::�{.Y:•:nr}:%::.?{4» 4.}.::rr.4}::.:•X?<}:;}.X•».L4X4:4f:..:?'c?:r:% ;{.;.. ^C:..:.{:{r.;:<• ., { tiHyc$Y�}... ? » ...:• •;:.:%: n:%: rX. •4F':r::v•44G:+i,::;:j!:i.{ili'r.:'r?i.%if::i.:n•.{.'?:/::::Kv:}i{�'f,.!'::....� ?-<i:'{r,".; .;i. ::.:�..- ?r�:'Y''4: !!+•. v A•.vs}..I ::..::•r,•f?;.;,'•'X;'i':v}X•,}: .,-:'rf a.::%::%{f; vr5..%YF yY•r:,.tq.Y. s :.4::.}r..{ f s*, :;-,•- .y: DA1l:�;;.OF. ER. ..IC> <' aUN.G<:<-:: .:<. •AK• X•Yr .4T.:. f' /kFFI IT »S .V. .B1CN1.... �v :•.vh•::•fi??::4::lv:ff.:..:r:+:}'f.G;Ff}»?.�•�•:••::}::•:••:.r.%Y+F l.-:!v'•}:.vr� !.n+.•..:..ii }:.....::.•:.: n::......... •:{}.+•!:4.{,{:}h.;{nv4.f•J. .,�Y . :+..:{4'??.•}} .{.:4•.a: F/, h>:f?•r.•{ av!�:::..r.}}•u4}XlY}iT.'w.{.r.:=:a!{1X•;:;.}.Y:%::;%%>Y;•••2:}%Y: Y't{ rR{%<:';5:.%:i+�+• ,�• .a,:,%}4:,:YY <: r�it-'` :?.:4:+?:vr.,.. .<,{.yc?�{5.?.:;;::�F,:rr:r,. .:�?/�.Nr•:..:::.:. r!..1..:.{.:rYn•.:»:n?.:.::::h.,t-N?; �:Li}?Y�:,rn :.•:..•.. :r: 'r.•..::.r}.• h• . :....:::;!r' »r.• ..vf:+..}y..:.•F:...r.n4n....r............ ..r-...•..Y....:. v}:{:rr:..:r... .fn.4 rr..rY,v•:;M:.:.:?^::.v:::•....:;.:..•r.�✓,.;h...n4.......r:{.{..:•.:':^.:.:v•..:.... Sv:v:fv.v :::Yr:.v:4. ?..�..} ,,SS.r r. •;}•!,». ..,:Y•rYx::: ::hr.. rhr:r r.Sr»..r..:.,... •::Y.?.....r...rr.: ...L.�...':R ••:??hYX.. :.f':r.....:•::»4:.• F.r•::?r:�v.:...:........;:4::•....../.•}:.ti{.... .............. n.v..;.r.,.v; {:•{{.Xn:{•.............. C••..r.:.v:::::::.....:......i:•:+}::.. .:..1>>..... ..:........ .:.....r.. �':n....:.:.. .. �............:......... ••..:...•:::•. ::• ::.?o-»::.4Y}.,::,-.s::•::h:••.::•::{W:{+r:::,:..fir,:{S ::?.}::S•}}X•X?4;:.•rni;::+:•:::v:::»::::r::r:n.....vt....»»r.,r.....r....:f/rix.v.......nv"}:v:{:•;nr:;•#i. .:lLt.}::...:::......v:::v:;x}::vw;?;.:r:70C;v-;in}}};?•}:!?...................... ...i..r..........:Y...n...:�:G'-'" On the 1,20. day of hN eh,V 1(' , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing EIZC. de"t'ery wAmiia-tnS documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing EC061 Kt/en •C -Q25.-ter Lchav, Cr trot VvAero Daytd vicjg Roluatti.r1Ze.SotAltrm Sue. — 2. xAe o f us w atrntsk, �v�dtan—C"rle* - - 1 1 1 1Mak O( , �+nS`1hevles �Muc es11\ 1vatclh Via. �e.4s^Cac� d er" (Signature of Sender) SO-hdkl k- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) c,, _ , y — -I certify'that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 11- biEA 71 xClr�� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary •act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: l f /q GI6 Notary P is in an f r the State of Wa ili:igton Notary lint)rn�}lC�r �ET ' My appointment expires: In 9/ 's < `' Project Name: CO 2ohG -rat twycAtteklisr ub RetzhG1 One Re- ive- Project Number: cup_I•Z5 q(o - duo - 121 , R.E 4 NOTARY.00C "� ;;, CITA: )F RENTON �i -IL ��� Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 13, 1996 ' Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section . PO Box 47703 - Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations ' Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on November 12, 1996: . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE BRAIN REZONE LUA-96-126,ECF,R Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1)to Commercial Office (CO). The existing,dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. Location: 3901 Talbot Road South. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on December 3, 1996. Following the end of the comment and appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a re-evaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. If you have questions, please call me at (206) 277-6181. 7 e ironment I vie Co m ttee, i� " Donald K. Erickson, AICP Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) , Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTR.DOC1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 5O',recycled material,20%post consumer • Our CITY' TF RENTON ..U. '4' . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 14, 1996 Dr. Eugene Brain, DDS kl }l 1r" 5454 Lake Washington SE st s@� 1N�°��GP C.� Bellevue, WA 98006 dNJP O C. qr d ve%% SUBJECT: Brain Rezone Project No. LUA-96-126,ECF,R Dear Property Owner: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on November 12, 1996, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. - The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the Environmental Review Committee under the authority of Section 4-6- 6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The 15 day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end at 5:00 PM on December 3, 1996. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 277-6181. For the Environment ev' o ittee, (7-_-_ ,$,J . Donald K. Erickson, AICP _ Project Manager DNSLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ® phis paper contains 50".,recycled material,20'0 post consumer CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: November 13, 1996 To: Don Erickson - From: Jana Huerter/ Environmental Review Committee Subject: Brain Rezone Project No. LUA-96-126,ECF,R • On behalf of the Environmental Review Committee, I would like to inform you that they have completed their review of your project. The Committee, on November 12, 1996, decided that the subject project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the Environmental Review Committee under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The 15 day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end on December 3, 1996. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. dnsmm I i ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: BRAIN REZONE I PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96.126,ECF,R . r Proposed city sponsored rezone of o privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus,on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)10 Commercial Office(CO).The existing dental offices would be a permitted use In the new CO Zone. No change of I use Is contemplated as a consequence of this City Initialled rezone proposal.Location:3901 Talbot Road • South. l THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. n YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, . THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. n APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING i EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM,_ ® YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 3, 1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,DECEMBER 3. 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. r. wr • , —.a 4 R—Sz •1-1— as a la• .36(1- j.. a > �' Reef t lh 316r§l , j i J CA r _P-1 L ! i — • /%• • : I I I I I "v ,i• •..:t_ (1771h Ave. ..(' `' y uEDcAL ccN7ER.' L. ` I 1 to o 0 S 4Cer SC. jA . r . nrn t FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION-AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I IPlease Include:the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION I, StviCL JLLC.LSVI , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted 6y me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on IJ()V Vu 1 •P.V 114; I.gglD Signed: c,CL 1CLL t,,��d� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 0 ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ' I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that . 1grt/1) 5 C. C r4 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volunt?ry`1gc 'ar e-uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ` Dated: 0 J/ 1'4 1-On Notary Publi i and for State_ f_Vfaisy to.n° Notary ( `Print) /9 i� ---) • 3 .L My appointment expires:- o NOTARY.DOC / ,-- - . .., . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: BRAIN REZONE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-126,ECF,R Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1) to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. Location:3901 Talbot Road South. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. I AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, . THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 3, 1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, DECEMBER 3, 1996: THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. • • • R-8 R=8 • •_, ce iu ..se.r.,..:Z:E7 I.• r S;36Efi-..S j.. y �o • +RIB; • _ • G. P-1 r�, 3 V8t f '` •% I ' �Ai +• p ' --- (177th Ave. • • —1 -\ • I McDCAL CENTER � 'I r• � 1 io 4a � -Co SA'JASt. J ti I / —. — 1-1 1-1-1 ; • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include theproject NUMBER:when calling for proper:file,:identifi.cation <:.; ';. ;;:,::::: • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-126,ECF,R APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/PLANNING &TECHNICAL SERVICES PROJECT NAME: BRAIN REZONE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1) to Commercial Office (CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3901 Talbot Road South LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department.of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on December 3, 1996. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: November 18, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: November 12, 1996 SIGNATURES: PreggAe m an, Administrator D l7E Depart nt of Planning/Building/Public Works m Chastain, Administrator DA'f / /. Community Service Department Le eler, ire Chi DATE Renton Fire Department DNSSIG.DOC ( _ NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. BRAIN REZONE LUA-96-126,ECF,R Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1) to Commercial Office (CO). No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. Location: 3901 Talbot Road South. The 15 day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on December 3, 1996. Following this, the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. C A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on December 3, 1996 at 9:00 AM to consider the Rezone. Publication Date: November 18, 1996 Account No. 51067 dnspub STAFF City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE November 12, 1996 Project Name Public Use(P-1)Rezones Applicant City of Renton File Number - LUA-096-126 - LUA-096 Project Manager - Don Erickson 130 Project Description See attached Proposal Description&Summary. Project Location 5 sites in vicinity of Talbot Road S. and SW 38th Court Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Not applicable. Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf Rezone,Not applicable Site Area Not applicable. Total Building Area gsf Rezone, • Not applicable RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non- significance for these non- project rezone actions. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A teal Period. X Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. Project Location Map ERC10-28.DOC City of Renion PB/PW Department • I \onmental Review Committee Staff Report CITY SPONSORED P-1 REZONES, O. -VE PRIVATE SITES LUA-96-126-LUA-96-130,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFNOVEMBER 11,1996 Page2 of 4 C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. These five rezones are considered to be non-project, legislative actions. As a consequence these rezones will in and by themselves not result in any actual physical development. Specific proposals resulting from this proposed new zoning, if it is approved, which are not exempt because of size will have to go through SEPA review. Impacts identified at that time could be mitigated. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Nexus: N/A 2. Air Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures:Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. • Nexus: N/A 3. Water Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Nexus: - 4. Plants Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 5. Animals Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. ERC10-28.DOC City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment vnmental Review Committee Staff Report CITY SPONSORED P-1 REZONES, Ur l VE PRIVATE SITES L UA-96-126-LUA-96-130,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFNOVEMBER 11,1996 Page3 of4 6. Energy and Natural Resources Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 9. . Environmental Health Impacts:These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 8. ; Land and Shoreline Use Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 9. Housing Impacts:These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 10. Aesthetics Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 11. Light and Glare • Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 12. Recreation Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 14. Transportation Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. ERC10-28.DOC City:of RenionPB/PWDepartment i E !mental Review Committee Staff Report CITY SPONSORED P-I REZONES, Ol _}E PRIVATE SITES LUA-96-126-LUA-96-130,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF NOVEMBER 11,1996 Page4 of 4 15. Public Services Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 16. Utilities Impacts: These five rezones are considered to be a legislative non-project action under SEPA. Mitigation Measures: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable,these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.. • ERC10-28.DOC • Proposal Description for Five Private Rezones from P-1 to CO Zone • In 1994 the Renton City Council authorized the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to proceed with the assimilation of those sites currently zoned Public Use(P-1) into Renton's other 21 zones. The need for this zone had been lessened by the City's 1993 Interim Zoning Code which included a number of new zones, most of which provided for most, if not all, of the uses previously allowed in the P-1 Zone. Also, analysis revealed that there had been a great deal of inconsistency in the application of the P-1 Zone over the years in that many public uses were not zoned P-1, having been adequately accommodated in the prevailing zones where they were located. Other reasons for changing the zoning were that the City had recently adopted new provisions providing greater development flexibility for ' ommunity facilities as well as a an early notification process for all publicly owned properties whenever there was a change in ownership,use, or major tenancy. In 1995 the City Council approved the first of the P-1.rezones to other zones,approving nine publicly sponsored private P-1 rezones. The current proposal is a continuation of the P-1 rezoning process begun in the fall of 1995. It involves City initiated rezoning of five (5) privately held P-1 zoned parcels located immediately north of Valley - Medical Center, near the intersection of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South. The five sites in question are designated Center Institution on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. All five of the current batch of privately owned P-1 zoned parcels are proposed to be rezoned to the Commercial Office(CO)Zone. Vicinity maps and legal descriptions for each site have been provided as part of the Master Application. Proposal Summary for Five Private P-1 Rezones It is the City's intent to phase out and eventually eliminate all of its current P-1 zoned properties by assigning other nearby zones that currently accommodate these uses or which can be easily amended to accommodate these uses are in place. The subject proposal is to rezone five(5)privately held properties located immediately north of Valley Medical Center near the intersection of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road S., (all on the west side of Talbot Road S.), from the Public Use(P-1)Zone to the Commercial Office(CO)Zone. The subject proposal, a legislative act, is considered to be a non-project action under the provisions of WAC 197- 11, SEPA Rules. Subsequent development proposals on these five(5)sites would be considered project actions. An Environmental Checklist has been prepared for the proposed rezoning of these five privately held,P-1 zoned sites to the CO Zone. 5RZNSMRY.DOCI City , inton Department of Planning/Building/F'._ w Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ') . COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1996 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT'MANAGER: DON ERICKSON PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 Wa&ATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH • SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the-west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /1/(/1/C- /7Z) )6 /N-5,6 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /7A) �w71 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS aAA— /D d ir) 1-1OG'r - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess t ' proposal. - Opki CR- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 • City:, enton Department of Planning/Building/I_ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 10lLL2 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1996 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 ispkATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing • Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • Nkrt,oY- Impaet- fDitte B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. LAII r9A Signature of Director or thori ed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City 1:-... Anton Department of Planning/Building/Pi, _,'Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVI W SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cork avl %eykko 4 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5,, 1996®Pi? APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBE..R 22, 1996 , 41 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON 7Q PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 ~ °--any J&ATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH gy���lJo SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. .ti A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 6OP6 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS VOP6 We have reviewed i plication it particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition i f o i to prope assess this proposal. 161(14 Signature of Dir tor or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City,` _<tenton Department of Planning/Building/i _ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET -- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Oka.tik ' _LycOMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1996 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 ,a-n"C `^N 14WATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A OPT 2. n M✓ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held:P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Cenirite_rgivNgffice,(Cp). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a Yonseduei$Ce1of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LIghVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 10 CO WI WI We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information�� i eded to properly assess this proposal Ala tOeti rD/tiyh6 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10l93 City ti. .canton Department of Planning/Building/P=. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATLON REVIEW VIEEWW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:F11(G P ��� A-u uif COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMidt 5xFIBLeukwuTVg 95 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOB r22,:1996J;6 APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DQl�,ERICLKSON .. 1. PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144- ' ,cATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH ' SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet ��{ y� 9 14,000 Feet , 6 /`'GtII0t �np ,_c. 6" Note, B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS iU,4 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /tin We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al information is n =d to properly assess this proposal. ,, l.,to /U 3�/7G Signature 6f Director or Authorized Repr entative Date DEVAPR,C Rev.10r93 City o^^.Denton Department of Planning/Building/P,.o,,:. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT � qv COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 19960,ow OF RFHTOf APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSONf'1n‘P5n PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 78144 ff T 7 1996 CATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH SITE AREA: N/A BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A fit:::::lf�� DdiFtStiON SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air - Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities , Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1V0 CO IW wiP vV We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,0ea U)a »/7.y/1,4 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City enton Department of Planning/Building/P Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:s jrfaoe_I WO-Siet.00L4IrCOMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1996 . APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-126,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22, 1996 r O APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON/LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON FRENTON PROJECT TITLE: BRAIN REZONE WORK ORDER NO: 7814479 kp&ATION: 3901 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH 96 SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A bUgtudlgVt:a SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Hlstor c/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS i' )v G0W(114 vvr• We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. A) ( W47;7 r /7_1 AC Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 ter -- . '.-, NOTICE OF PROirOSED ENVIRONMENTAL/RELUNE APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Rezone (R) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BRAIN REZONE/LUA-96-126,ECF,R DESCRIPTION: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zOned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus, on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use (P-1) to Commercial Office (CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. GENERAL LOCATION: 3901 Talbot Road South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Rezone The date of Tuesday, December 3, 1996, at 9:00 AM, has been set for a Rezone (R) public hearing to review the above- referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications; by mail, of the-City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. • w _..... R-8 . .R-8 j ::-- S° 36fh... S 3 h ' ;7thSt • U P-1 . , 8 , //I./ I:•. , : : : Q. 177th Ave. VALLEY c,J f W t ' MEDICAL CENTER 31 ,:� f aai/I-„'' 1 O �;r/ �1� ;. �! ..,, ,/ 03 y.p. 0- -C 0 CO ••.. :: GENMALOT.DOC S 43rd' St. '; ��/ p� 1, ,. t i 4 3023059002 - 3023059026 - 3023059034 CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON BRAIN W EUGENE DDS 200 MILL AVE SOUTH 200 MILL AVE S 54541LK WASHINGTON BLVD SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98006 ' 3023059040 3023059044 3023059045 HURST G A HOSKIN THOMAS J WILLARDSON MARION C 3619 TALBOT RD S 9370 46TH AVE SW 409 S 36TH ST RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98136 RENTON WA 98055 3023059052 3023059053 _ 3023059054 ACIERTO DOMINGO C+NATIVIDAD LOKEN CLIFFORD 0 D+R ENTERPRISES 412 S 37TH ST 417 S 36TH ST 18107 157TH AVE NE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 WOODINVILLE WA 98072 3023059055 3023059109 3023059110 BOSTICK MICHAEL S+PATRICIA FRARY LYNN R MD OBRIEN DANIEL N DR 411 S 36TH ST 3764 SW 171ST 400 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98166 RENTON WA 98055 3023059111 3123059026 3123059065 SPRINGBROOK ASSOCIATES ALLENBACH HERMAN M BRAIN W E PO BOX 53525 1018 SW 144TH 5454 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD SE BELLEVUE WA 98015 SEATTLE WA 98166 BELLEVUE WA 98006 3123059085 5070000010 5070000020 BRAIN W E AGOG SILVER D+GRACE T GILLIAN ANNE LIVING TRUST 5454 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD SE 3621 SHATTUCK AVE S 3615 SHATTUCK AVE S BELLEVUE WA 98006 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 5070000030 5070000040 5070000050 PONDER THOMAS L KUMARAN RUDRA+SAVITRI BOSTICK HARRY G 3609 SHATTUCK AVE S 3603 SHATTUCK AVE S 3527 SHATTUCK AVE S ' RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 5070000140 5070000150 5070000160 SUNDQUIST JOANNE HILLMAN LAWRENCE D+NANCY L VICTOR B BLISS SHIRLEY 3620 SHATTUCK AVE S 400 S 37TH ' 3604 SHATTUCK AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 5070000170 5070000180 7616800290 THOMAN STEPHANIE REMY JOHN J FRARY LYNN R 404 S 37TH ST 408 S 37TH ST 3764 S.W 171ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98166 • 7616800300 7616800310 8558600030 VILLASISTA MARY VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER MATNEY CINDY C 9612 S 177TH ST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1332 E WALNUT RENTON WA 98055 400 S 43RD ST KENT WA 98031 RENTON WA 98055 V 8558600035 8558600040 8558600070 LOVE BRUCE HIATT RONALD D JR+JOLENE M NAYLOR KERMIT D &NANCY J 3614 TALBOT RD S 17258 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH 3607 MORRIS AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 8558600075 8558600080 8558600125 MAPLE FLOYD GILBERT LINDA E FOURNARAKIS NIKOLAOS 17249 98TH AVE S PO BOX 58244 4008 78TH AVE SE RENTON WA 98005 RENTON WA 98058 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 8558600130 8558600135 8558600140 EVANS TIMOTHY M AASHIEM WALLACE L GETTY MICHAEL G 17412 TALBOT ROAD SOUTH 17420 SPRINGBROOK RD 17405 98TH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 8558600145 8558600150 8558600155 ARNSON THOMAS C+NANCY L THOMPSON O'NEAL+EDNA L HWANG JACK J+SHIRLEY 17411 98TH AVE S 17419 98TH AVE S 516 S 38TH CT RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 8558600185 8558600190 8558600195 BATES VERLA M HILLIARD KATHLEEN R HILL VAUGHN L 9603 SOUTH 175TH STREET 9613 SOUTH 175TH STREET 9623'S 175TH RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 8558600200 8857670040 8857670050 PEDERSEN JAMES R&LARAE D VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL 521 S 38TH CT 400 S 43RD 400 S 43RD RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 8857670100 8857670100 8857670110 VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL 400 S 43RD 400 S 43RD 400 S 43RD RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 I I ..,, ___..„ , 1 INorncE I : - - PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAMEINUMBER: BRAIN REZONEILUA-96-026,ECF,R DESCRIPTION: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel al the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus.on Ilse west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office(CO). The existing dental offlees would be a permitted use In the new CO Zone. No change of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City Initiated rezone proposal. GENERAL LOCATION: 3901 Talbot Road South PUBLIC APPROVALS: • • Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat _ I _Conditional Use Permit XXX% Rezone _Site Plan Approval %X%X Environmental Review _Shoreline Conditional Use _Other i Permit Flit&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit The dale of Tuesday,December 3,1896,at 9:00 AM,has been set fore Rezone(R)public hearing to review the above- referenced matter. The hearing,before Mr.Fred Kaufman,Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held In the Council Chambers on the second floor o1 City Hall,Renton,Washington. The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any lime prior to Public Hearings,during Public Headngs or prior to an administrative site plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of • applicant's'Notice of Application'publication In the Valley Daily News. For further Information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notification of the City's environmental determinations.appeal periods and/or the public hearing drrle(s)for this prefect,please contact the Development Services Division at 235.2550. r•.-, _ Il_ inN1h1 , • _ 1- _8 f z R-8 1 `i D. • r. • '361•s• I• -, • w --.• e' ,3iig,-,, s _ R a -, _C.A .P-1 set �'.. ., :�• :r '-- 117711 Ave. ' 'ZYLdGAI CCNTER,irk ll • H 1 100 CD CI S 43rd'8t �� t tn PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. ' CERTIFICATION I, Jtt.CALS7Y , hereby certify that-Wee. copies of the above document wered by me inIVI Ir al conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . 0 16,t0lb . Signed: WU-1)i_Jilt m STATE OF WASHINGTON ) , • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that o DY ..JrA ai' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary\�,6t f r jje••.uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. .. �;l4C)-.G.'•.:7,9 .si,s e Dated: • /U /G/6 .1,r r _// 1� °.• Notary Public i nd for t r - State'�_f L la ,,,i1 Qtonr' J. ark —9 .,- Notary (Print) 4t�P1. & �� L_. • . My appointment expires: , ,,g' • • NoTARY.00c 2 . , j \i „,.........J. ... itiorm_i c . . . , 11_1 ..........„„ _.. PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: BRAIN REZONE/LUA-96-126,ECF,R DESCRIPTION: Proposed city sponsored rezone of a privately held P-1 zoned parcel at the northeast corner of the Valley Medical Center campus,on the west side of Talbot Road South from Public Use(P-1)to Commercial Office (CO). The existing dental offices would be a permitted use in the new CO Zone. No change. of use is contemplated as a consequence of this City initiated rezone proposal. GENERAL LOCATION: 3901 Talbot Road South PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit • Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit XXXX Rezone Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other • Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The date of Tuesday,December 3,1996,at 9:00 AM,has been set for a Rezone(R)public hearing to review the above- referenced matter. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall,Renton,Washington. The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application"publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. - .----- 167 r....__._.._ 1.� 1. . St . R-8 •• CC R-8 ::R-8._. : _ >, > S;36tfiT s 1 .:.1 . `'D•' S 37th`._St ' ' ;ith UP-1 CA iiii `78f • .- A= • •;• ' . ...__....._. (177th Ave. . I)en 0 .:P=1 f==;\ r...4. VACLEY / W � 1 0 CAL CENTER, • ick J 4 ! .� . ..., ll i C13 S 43rd'St. CO(P) PLEASE INCLUDE..THEsPROJECT:NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION :>.ITY:::::ER .N. .Old........ ..... ................�:< <;>[ > g< ; f::1 €iiigin i «`> <'egiii <`< C ER)ACE;>;; . I VI <::::>:.. >>><>> '€'><< < €> >«>< <>` !NMi»> > [ "<E Si0 :.::;::::::::::::::::......:::.......:::::>:::....»::......:>::::. ...............>.................:: DEVELO:P.M.ENT.S. .R...ICES..D.....1. .. N.......................................................... ::»:::::>:<:::>::>:;: :>::::::::<:>::::::>::>:: > PERnO.W S '`< iPR >�' .ECTiINFORM d oa): ;,;:e%< ease:`attach'ari'add ti na.. Ng3:e=:ff;tfiareis riorettii3rip''nelea'alown::rs..P..�:::: .::.::.�:. ...;.................;..:.. notanzed:>N(aster<'A'pplicatiori:fdr::eact::o'wn r......,.... .. .. ..:.:............... . . PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Vr (,)_aer II I 1 dill' 1141.(ikr V- I .MZ i "1" 10 "rQvet.)VYl '1OO.d u.) PROPERTY/ ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 'Cre I i 14 1Dot�O • KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NU BER(S): ' CITY: / ...��atac ZIP: J/2 3D(59000 C2 ��ems` br . .3/2305 f (2J TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND 3 5q 7✓¢ �l - 50`1 �OLI -Z�9�1 iililil»::€€ : APR.LI.CAN;T:: 1f:::ofh r:?tF:a�:..o. . .n....:...:::::. :.:...::... -rAL. C�� ..:.......................... NAME:T vba'`i I0/5`''" /1') t A ' 1 ' PROPOSED LAND USES: .ft- '• — 7.6cM . 1 JCIc� JN1'A(_ , -jCg.__ - COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: / ate. ON C N- -r 1 ADDRESS: Zee, /\AJ LC— AVI\1 L ' PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): C .K1.-r 'r l-r G014 CITY: /...toy(( ZIP: Cit[ e_a5 EXISTING ZONING: z.,c5vi . ' TELEPHONE NUMBER: . /// ... --77--. 1i.E3 I PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): �h Co i - -c I Jf 1 SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: I� 714 i,C�% �cIV) COMPANY (if applicable): o ► .1\15 PROJECT VALUE: ADDRESS: `/> ��}7 /� /\ q i / Av�u� IS THE SITE LOCATED I ''''' •' •UV rpr OTECTION AREA? 140 OCT 16- 1996 CITY: ZIP: CIE3 ; IS THE SITE LOCATF6tIkMINMEAUIVITNOGF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? }.� J CITY OF RENTON �l CI TELEPHONE NUMBER: l % L%� -r ! 1 ^v F:.>P:RO.P.ERTY<:. act a.ch>:se ar...a hee.t:>>if:>ne:c.essa ... :........:::.:::...:..::...: :..:::�::<><::;>:<:::>::>:::.:»:<:<:>:::.::>;::>::::LEGA►f...DES. .F#I.P� 1r.�O. .::..:.................................t......:�................ ....... �........................................ .1......... ..:.... :... . .:.. A-t7rtA Z:7, L, ,. ,A I: .: :..<'�t. :::: aff::>:will:>:..d.e.te..r.m......e.... . 5.......................................... .... : > >: :>: li. (o.n... es... ha:;;:a . ... ......C... ...st...................... ......................................................... .............. . :<:.::.::.::.::::::::::::::::: :.�.;:::;;:;;Ch.�ck...;:al<<�P.p:::�a.t:::.:;:><#YP:..:::::'t.:.:;;x::.Pp..Y..:,:.:.::.:Y.:::.....:.....,:,.: ...:........:.,.. : . ... ............ .. � - _ANNEXATION .- •$ SUBDIVISION:„ -_ , - • • COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT •`' $ g REZONE $ —LOT LINE-ADJUSTMENT . $ — SPECIAL PERMIT . $ _SHORT PLAT —TEMPORARY•PERMIT • $ •• • —TENTATIVE PLAT $• — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- .. $ - PRELIM_ INARY PLAT T_ - $ —SITE PLAN APPROVAL . ,• $�. _FINAL PLAT $ GRADE j& FILL PERMIT $ • - - — . (NO. CU.. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: ' $ _VARIANCE ' (FROM SECTION.: - ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ •— FINAL , _WETLAND.PERMIT . $ - - _ ROUTINE VEGETATION' • MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: • •• ' ' _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT . . $ — CONDITIONAL USE $ , — VARIANCE $ — EXEMPTION $No Charge X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ ___LiA___ REVISION $ 1 • > V T<:O.F€OWN S . ...... I, (Print Name) ' ,declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the- authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained.and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in and for the State of - residing at . - (Name of Owner/Representative) — , on the_day of 19 (Signature of Owner/Representative) , • (Signature of Notary Public) .:..::.:.;..';•.::..>..:.:..:......:.:........ ..::::::::e::s::::::: :::,:.S:A•. .:::.I T. li:.l>.s:..:F'sec :..,:S to.::?<b.e..: )..; te dby:;�:..:iY: • ;.:.:.;.;. :...::::....;... . .. .;:.... ..;... ..: . `.;<.:..;:.';: ':..::.:<.:..::m ,F <> "<>L.:Li.4. «P ;>:> FR > TP< <SP> RVMP .;U ..`.' .... .>.. .:.. .::: ::»::Clt =IIe:Numbe :: ::.:» . :.7.;D. W .< .. MHP> : BSP: ACPA : -. :. :<; .::._.:<.::.;::::;;:>:;: ..;; .. :.:> :: .. . .. . .. . • . ....: : X .. .. ::. :TOTALPOSTAGEPRO ;; ::::: : > : ::: :TTOT L;:FE ES. . .:. I .:.. , '.:>ti; . MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 .U2245903403 1;g023059030 . BRAIN. W EUGENE. .DDS 5454 LK WASHINGTON BLVD SE " BELLEVUE WA 98006 34 PARCEL A OF VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL - DR BRAIN RENTON SHORT PLAT NO 213-78 RECORDING NO `7812149018 SD PLAT DAF - POR NE 1/4 OF SEC 31-23-05 LY W OF SPRINGBROOK RD E OF ST RD NO 167 & N OF S 43RD ST TGW POR SE 1/4 OF 30-23-05 LY W OF SPRINGBROOK RD E OF ST RD NO 167 & S OF FOLG DESC LN - BEG ON N/S C/L OF SD SEC 250 FT N OF S 1/4 COR SD SEC TH S 89-03-08 E PLT S LN SD SEC 1055 FT TH S 72-49-04 E TO W LN SPRINGBROOK RD & TERM SD LN LESS POR SD SEC 31 DESC AS FOLG - BEG INTSN OF W LN OF SPRINGBROOK RD WITH N LN OF SD SEC TH N 89-03-08 W 300 FT TH S 0-56-52 W 85 FT TH S 89-03-08 E 289. 74 FT TO W LN SPRINGBROOK RD TH N 07-50-01 E 85.62 FT TO POB LESS RD 312305906504 3123059065 BRAIN W E 5454 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD 'tE BELLEVUE WA 98006 312305 65 N 75 FT OF E 200 FT OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LY W OF CO RD # 80 & MEAS ALG N LN OF SD SUBDIV 312305908500 3123059085 BRAIN W E 5454 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD'`�L BELLEVUE WA 98006 312305 85 N 85 FT OF POR OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LY WLY OF CO RD & E OF LN 300 FT W ,MEAS ALG N LN, OF WLY LN SD CO RD LESS N 75 FT OF E 200 FT ,MEAS ALG N LN, CA 0 s 'an d . CITY OF RENTON ZONING MAP 3t. R-8 LEGEND RC Resource Conservation ort C.) ----r R-1 Residential 1 du/ac C.) R-8 ""-. R-8 . R-5 Residential 5 du/ac f24 k. rz.., ----1.-- ›-, S . .: ...;-) S 36tfi s i R-8 Residential 8 du/ac Q.) ia.) ,..., 7:s' ---. R-8 RMH Residential Manufactured Homes ›- , . •- • . C4 ‘ 7th 37th St. R-10 Residential 10 du/ac R-14 Residential 24 du/ac P-1 (--) CA 41) RH-I Residential Multi—Family Infill sal RM-N Residential Multi—Family Neighborhood Center % — /ii", RH-C Residential Multi—Family Suburban Center 7.,A RH-U Residential Multi—Family Urban Center 177th Ave. cc Convenience Commercial ..P-1 • . ...... VALLEY C• ! Ck \\ CN Center Neighborhood MEDICAL CENTER -ty• f ,..„f \ CS Center Suburban i.8, ! .,,,,:i. \‘ CD Center Downtown %\ . ,'-'Q ^C '..) \....4.‘ COR Center Office Residential , cI7 : l'\."-' '.- ' b.. 0,-- :: ' I es .c.y CA Commercial Arterial )CO 0 S 4 3 r ci. St. / 565" ) Lso 1 Commercial Office 1 ossm am nom.arsio IH Industrial — Heavy 1N Industrial — Medium ‘'Q. CO It Industrial — Light ‘,.._•• P-1 Public Use Sj‘r P—I (R) Publicly Owned S 4511101. 6 School P-1 P-1 I CCI coCO(P) --- Renton City Limits 0 600 1200 imim . ...... RM—I 1 :7200 s, , 0 -s'r-- LONG RANGE PLANNING +."milejj'i°6+ P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES 08/02/96 . ; R-1 (.1 / 5331 PR-14 Dr. Eugene Brain - 3901 Talbot Road S. Proposal Description for Five Private Rezones from P-1 to CO Zone In 1994 the Renton City Council authorized the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to proceed with the assimilation of those sites currently zoned Public Use (P-1) into Renton's other 21 zones. The need for this zone had been lessened by the City's 1993 Interim Zoning Code which included a number of new zones, most of which provided for most, if not all, of the uses previously allowed in,the P-1 Zone. Also, analysis revealed that there had been a great deal of inconsistency in the application of the P-1 Zone over the years in that many public uses were not zoned P-1, having been adequately accommodated in the prevailing zones where they were located. Other reasons for changing the zoning • were that the City had recently adopted new provisions providing greater development flexibility for community facilities as well as a an early notification process for all publicly owned properties whenever there was a change in ownership, use, or major tenancy. In 1995 the City Council approved the first of the P-1 rezones to other zones,approving nine publicly sponsored private P-1 rezones. The current proposal is a continuation of the P-1 rezoning process begun in the fall of 1995. It involves City initiated rezoning of five (5) privately held P-1 zoned parcels located immediately north of Valley Medical Center, near the intersection of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South. The five sites in question are designated Center Institution on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. All five of the current batch of privately owned P-1 zoned'parcels are proposed to be rezoned to the Commercial Office (CO) Zone. Vicinity maps and legal descriptions for each site have been provided as part of the Master Application. Proposal Summary for Five Private P-1 Rezones It is the City's intent to phase out and eventually eliminate all of its current P-1 zoned properties by assigning other nearby zones that currently accommodate these uses or which can be easily amended to accommodate these uses are in place. The subject proposal is to rezone five(5)privately held properties located immediately north of Valley Medical Center near the intersection of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road S., (all on the west side of Talbot Road S.), from the Public Use(P-1)Zone to the Commercial Office(CO)Zone. The subject proposal, a legislative act, is considered to be a non-project action under the provisions of WAC 197- 11, SEPA Rules. Subsequent development proposals on these five(5) sites would be considered project actions. An Environmental Checklist has been prepared for the proposed rezoning of these five privately held, P-1 zoned sites to the CO Zone. OCT i 6 1996 • 5RZNSMRY.DOC/ DEVELONIvitN'r PLANNING CITY OF RENTON .......::...:...:.:..:::.:.:::: . .nto. 1I :.:. . ..............:::::.:::::.::::.: ............� `ENVI.RONM.EN.Ti4 ... .......... ... ........ ....... .... ........................................................ PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: • This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. _ You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need • to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions(actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and "affected geographic area,"respectively. . A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Public (P-1) Zone rezones of five privately held parcels around S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South. 2. Name of applicant: - City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Michael D. Kattermann RECEIVED City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 OCT 1 8 1996 206-277-6190 PLANNMG 4. Date checklist prepared: • DEVELOPWIENEt4T CITY of R October 14, 1996 • 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services Division 96PRSEPA.DOC •t .,1 City of Renton Environmental a; klist Fi_ ?ivate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 2 of 13 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): The City Council is expected to review the proposed action in October or November, 1996. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. This is a non-project action. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. DEIS for the adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Jan. 16, 1992; FEIS for City's Comprehensive Plan, Feb. 1, 1993; and, SETS for City's Comprehensive Plan, Dec. 1994. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Not applicable,this is a non-project action. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Renton City Council will need to approve the proposed zoning reclassifications of the five subject parcels. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed non-project action is a proposal to rezone five privately held parcels north of Valley Medical Center in the vicinity of S. 38th Court from P-1 zoning to CO zoning. Before these rezones can be finalized amendments to the CO Zone are required to make retirement residences a permitted secondary use in this zone. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. File# Names of Owners 8 Addresses File# Names of Owners 8 Addresses PR-10 Lynn Frary, M.D. PR-13 Springbrook Associates 3711 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 403 S. 38th Court; Renton, 98055 PR-11 Dr. Daniel Obrien PR-14 Dr. Eugene Brain 400 S. 38th Court; Renton, 98055 3901 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 PR-12 D & R Enterprises 3731 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The proposed rezone of the five subject parcels in the vicinity of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South to the CO Zone are located on relatively flat land. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1.Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Ch;y 0 _ Five i `,te P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 3 of 13 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable.The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and • by themselves result in any development. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with Impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: - Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately; held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 2. AIR a. What types.of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. c. Proposed,measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the.site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental hclist Fi? ,ivate P-1.Rezories to CO Zone A October 11,1996 Page 4 of 13 Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These j rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material . Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the -CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known._ . - • - - - - Not applicable. The proposed non-project,action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to. the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year tloodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 6) Does the proposal Involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Ground Water: 1). Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, .purpose, and • approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action. 2) Describe,waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served.(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Ch, t Five, gate P-1_Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 5 of 13 Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Not applicable. The subject proposal is a legislative, non-project action and therefore will note` have development associated impacts. See above. 2) Could 'waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. See above. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not applicable. The proposed action does not include a specific site or development proposal. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current non-project action. 4. PLANTS • a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action. N/A deciduous tree:alder, maple, aspen, other __ N/A evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other N/A shrubs N/A grass N/A pasture N/A crop or grain N/A wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other N/A water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other N/A other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is.not applicable to the current non-project action. • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project action. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: • Not applicable.at this time. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site:. • Not applicable at this time. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental C; jst Fiv, ;vete P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 6 of 13 will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current non-project proposal. Birds:hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other N/A Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other N/A Fish:,bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other N/A b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No known threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the subject rezone sites. However, at the time of subsequent development this issue would be appropriately addressed. Since the current proposal is considered to be a non-project action analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable. • c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result-in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project proposal. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from'the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by-themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. f Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevantto the current non-project action. b. Would your project.affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? if so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current proposal. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five ' privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Since the uses allowed under the proposed new zoning are not expected to have any greater need for public services than the uses allowed under existing zoning analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental CI >t FivE;_ _`late P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 7 of 13 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project proposal. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the a CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the proposal. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning-five • privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project proposal. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impacts, If any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current proposal. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves - result in any development. The subjects sites of this rezone are typically vacant or used for medical related uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not applicable..The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Describe any structures on the site. Not applicable. Whereas there are structures on some of the five rezone sites, the subject proposal to rezone these sites is a non-project action. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. See above. d Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, no demolition is anticipated as a result of the proposed action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? These five privately held parcels are currently zoned Public Use (P-1) Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental C! ist Fiv' vete P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 - - Page 8 of 13 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the five rezone sites is Center Institution. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment'is not applicable to the proposal. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. - i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, If any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: Not"applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. The CO Zone allows building heights of 250 feet on sites 25,000 sq. ft. or larger. Since the maximum height in the P-1 Zone is 50 feet (without special development provisions)taller structures than in the P-1 Zone could occur. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action that will rezone properties to a zone that allows greater building height, but reduced lot coverage over existing zoning. Increased building heights might obstruct more views from upland properties than under the provisions of the current P-1 zoning. On the other hand, decreased lot coverage and good site plan review might create view corridors below 50 feet in height that might not otherwise have been provided. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental ChE; Five t )te P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 9 of 13 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Since these rezones are considered to be a non-project action view impacts cannot be fully assessed until specific project actions are developed. Site plan review and SEPA disclosure at the time of future development would allow view impacts, if any, to be assessed and mitigation measures proposed where appropriate. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. • b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities`to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmentalt, `klist F. ,_rivate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 10 of 13 Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water,rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, mitigation measures are not required for these non- project actions. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. See above. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone,sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Not applicable.The subject proposal is a non-project action. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton.Environmental CI,' st FM, rate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 11 of 13 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this'checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of fug di I u e Proponent: _ c,�K�/ t Name Printed: CLl i� .r' 13. 0 f4-e-rma r r\ Date: 96PRSEPA.DOC . 4 - City of Renton Environmental�_ 'city Fii,, ivate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 12 of 13 Di. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the Rem at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. (a) How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in an increased discharge to water, emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise.- (b) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Not applicable. - 2. (a) How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in impacts to plants, animals, fish, and marine life. (b) Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of plants, animals fish or marine life. 3. (a) How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed non-project action is a legislative act pertaining to the zoning designation on five existing site. This action, if approved, will not result in any development by itself. Individual project actions will be required to comply with the SEPA Rules. Therefore, the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of energy or natural resources. (b) Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of energy or natural resources. 4. (a) How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study) for governmental protection;such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in impacts to environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands. (b) Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. See above. 961;RSEPA.DOC • City of Renton Environmental CI, ,List FivL ,\'ate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 13 of 13 5. (a) How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal that would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. (b) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. See above. 6. (a) How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in increased demands on transportation, public services and utilities. (b) Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not applicable. See above. 7. (a) Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local,state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful tack of II isc r on m Proponent: Name Printed: Date: 96PRSEPA.DOC • ..........:.:::.......::.:::::::......... . ty at,:f Renton `:`:" :::::: :::::: :::: :: ::: ::::: :::::: ::; ::ENVI�4.O..NM.E.N..T�4L....0 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be - _ done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. • INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each_question accurately and-carefully,.to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even-if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: • Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions(actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Public (P-1) Zone rezones of five privately held parcels around S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South. 2. Name of applicant: - City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Michael D. Kattermann City of Renton • 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 206-277-6190 4. Date checklist prepared: • October 14, 1996 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services Division 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental C. Dist Phi rvate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 2 of 13 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): The City Council is expected to review the proposed action in October or November, 1996. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. This is a non-project action. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. DEIS for the adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Jan. 16,.1992; FEIS for City's Comprehensive Plan, Feb. 1, 1993; and, SEIS for City's Comprehensive Plan, Dec. 1994. _ 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. . Not applicable,this is a non-project action. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. - —Renton City Council will need to approve the proposed zoning reclassifications of the five subject parcels. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed non-project action is a proposal to rezone five privately held parcels north of Valley Medical Center in the vicinity of S. 38th Court from P-1 zoning to CO zoning. Before these rezones can be finalized amendments to the CO Zone are required to make retirement residences a permitted secondary use in this zone. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,_site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Fille# Names of Owners 8 Addresses File# Names of Owners 8 Addresses PR-10 Lynn Frary, M.D. PR-13 Springbrook Associates 3711 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 403 S. 38th Court; Renton, 98055 PR-11 Dr. Daniel Obrien PR-14 Dr. Eugene Brain 400 S. 38th Court; Renton, 98055 3901 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 PR-12 D & R Enterprises 3731 Talbot Road S.; Renton, 98055 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes; mountainous, other The proposed rezone of the five subject parcels in the vicinity of S. 38th Court and Talbot Road South to the CO Zone are located on relatively flat land. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of'and by themselves result in any development. 96RSEPA.DOC • I . • • City of Renton Environmental Chy j Fives ate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 3 of 13 c. What general types of soils are found on the.site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. _ - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. f. Could-erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. " c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental C. _;list Fiv__x a vate P-1 Rezones to'CO Zone October 11,1996 - Page 4 of 13 Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available'plans. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be • placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of • fill material. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,' note location on the site plan. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels, from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. • Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). 96PRSEPA.DOC a , City of Renton Environmental VI, ;>t Fivt, late P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 5 of 13 Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. • Not applicable. The subject proposal is a legislative, non-project action and therefore will not have development associated impacts. See above. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. See above. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not applicable. The proposed action does not include a specific site or development proposal. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current non-project action. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: • Not applicable. The-proposed non-project action includes 'rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to this non-project action. N/A deciduous tree:alder, maple, aspen, other N/A evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other • N/A shrubs N/A grass N/A pasture N/A crop or grain N/A wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other N/A water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other N/A _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current non-project action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable: The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project action. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not applicable at this time. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project action. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Not applicable at this time. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Ch`., st FivEs 'ate P-1 Rezones to.CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 6 of 13 will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current non-project-- proposal. Birds:hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other N/A Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other N/A Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other N/A b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No known threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the subject rezone sites. However, at the time of subsequent development this issue would be appropriately addressed. Since the current proposal is considered to be a non-project action analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable. c. Is the site part of a migration route?.If so, explain Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project proposal. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and - by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of _ the environment is not applicable to the proposal. -- 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to the current non-project action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current proposal. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Since the uses allowed under the proposed new zoning are not expected to have any greater need for public services than the uses allowed under existing zoning analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental Chs -t Five, Late P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 7 of 13 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 .Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will nor of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project proposal. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is,not relevant to the proposal. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning-five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not relevant to this non-project proposal. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impacts, if any: Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These ' rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the current proposal. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. The subjects sites of this rezone are typically vacant or used for medical related uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. _ c. Describe any structures on the site. Not applicable. Whereas there are structures on some of the five rezone sites, the subject proposal to rezone these sites is a non-project action. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. See above. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels;from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. Therefore, no demolition is anticipated as a result of the proposed action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? These five privately held parcels are currently zoned Public Use (P-1) Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. 96PRSEPA.DOC • City of Renton Environmental C _list Fig_ *ate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 8 of 13 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the five rezone sites is Center Institution. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. j. . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. Therefore, -analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. ' Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. The CO Zone allows building heights of 250 feet on sites 25,000 sq. ft. or larger. Since the maximum height in the P-1 Zone is 50 feet (without special development provisions)taller structures than in the P-1 Zone could occur. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. The subject proposal is a non-project action that will rezone properties to a zone that allows greater building height, but reduced lot coverage over existing zoning. Increased building heights might obstruct more views from upland properties than under the provisions of the current P-1 zoning. On the other hand, decreased lot coverage and good site plan review might create view corridors below 50 feet in height that might not otherwise have been provided. 96PRSEPA.DOC . • ( City of Renton Environmental Cli, E;t Five rate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 9 of 13 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Since these rezones are considered to be a non-project action view impacts cannot be fully assessed until specific project actions are developed. Site plan review and SEPA disclosure at the time of future development would allow view impacts, if any, to be assessed and mitigation measures proposed where appropriate. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a.. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not _ applicable to the proposal. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c._ What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not-applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not • applicable to the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not.applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c.. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not.applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION - a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental.( jvate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 10 of 13 Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? • Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?, Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. d. Will,the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or.private? Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water,rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable. Therefore, mitigation measures are not required for these non- project actions. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. The proposed non-project action includes rezoning five privately held parcels from the P-1 Zone to the CO Zone. These rezones will not of and by themselves result in any development. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct Impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. See above. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Not applicable.The subject proposal is a non-project action. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. Therefore, analysis of this element of the environment is not applicable to the proposal. 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton.Environmental Ci,` ,st Fivi ,late P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 11 of 13 C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of .non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of fug di I u e Proponent: �Iti Name Printed: i o ,1 d Date: )lam 1/ — 6 96PRSEPA.DOC City of Renton Environmental imklist Fi, ivate P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 12 of 13 D. SUPPLEMENTAL.SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. (a) How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous _ substances; or production of noise? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in an increased discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise. (b) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Not applicable. 2. (a) How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? - The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in impacts to plants, animals, fish, and marine life. (b) Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of plants, animals fish or marine life. 3. (a) How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed non-project action is a legislative act pertaining to the zoning designation on five existing site. This action, if approved, will not result in any development by itself. Individual project actions will be required to comply with the SEPA Rules. Therefore, the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of energy or natural resources. (b) Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in the depletion of energy or natural resources. 4. (a) How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated(or eligible or under study) for governmental protection;such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in impacts to environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands. (b) Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. See above. 96PRSEPA.DOC • City of Renton.Environmental C. gist Fiv_ ;vete P-1 Rezones to CO Zone October 11,1996 Page 13 of 13 5. (a) How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal that would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. (b) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. See above. 6. (a) How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not directly result in increased demands on transportation, public services and utilities. (b) Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not applicable. See above. 7. (a) Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local,state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment The proposed non-project action does not involve a specific site or development proposal and therefore the proposal would not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful pck of II isc r on m Proponent: / Name Printed: /Zl;4\ f . Date: /Q 96PRSEPA.DOC