Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA96-093 (2)
iIs/ ••t- / - --- .-.- ..-. ..-. s IP 4 M A 4 _ Q ,) ,o J E,F �2n .953 49 c 9 b • �r f•35 S _� �/ a ��yfr0 04. 8 — —`P ° 2--- V ' r1 is .o.c� /" ' V1,11' L /1' 52 /� c oi' `tiff .- p� \ IO 0 1,. /.. •,�C� 5 3 V o z e� 1►. , o C h boa C • p /t Q _ iti 2e0 ,, r 4 0/°° 00 0-- 1i,9 as T �7s t '"�5 ( .0 \I ' �Z d13• IP {L-Sn3oS 1 y t,`, ,e onoj- /' ' 0'.�M 41_c 6-11 I —mil�ca3 S SS3•30-57 en i.r-c% _ 4( —g C- i\.(li \_--_ .—.°I3 G,I,c.l.eti3Z•1_:5-0—p tI 8 0.,f:4,,t,.31--,,_ A l,e..-.. . . 3Ay0 finds —_ Os . ea-5- .• tt6i1 qAo,•.o l l - a( poop 4, 65 �0370 a 13 �) `�1-10° v� 1 1 ,8 S O ' / m '". -. - tom'_ . / 0000 ✓:. 6`J t a ti a >� • j° '�50 a 8 `�j fie, ��t - -. • LL, II • fj• i h oc . * °S �N �,", d� 0 - 6., 9 1 L i rn - N.-4 I�9e,- "di, y1 / i . i %op'''. '-Ilk 44\, e) -yr __________ -7_____ . ,......----------------% - -''.‘ 2.- . N \ ,,,,ClO s 0^‘`40,5 ) .:.,';°; • 4010::i. ..\\' 0 ' . ,r , n �� as. UJ/1U/Jb [Ut 10:ZZ kAA 1 ZUb U31 U bZ MUChL.ESHUUI t'1SH WJuul •r i-- MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 1s �= INDIA BINDIE FISHERIES DEPARTMENT TRIBE F . . . e DEVELOPMENT PLANNING »1 CITY OF RENTON • SEP 1 1 1996 10 September 1996 Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP • City of Renton RECEIVED Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: MDNS ISSUED FOR MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEMENT (LUA-96- 093,SM,SMV,ECF1 Dear Mr. Pywell: • The Environmental Division of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe has reviewed the MDNS issued for a proposal to replace an existing 225 foot pier with another 225 foot pier, though of slightly smaller overwater coverage. The applicant is to be commended for using wood mooring piles rather than using fingers as in the old structure. However, the application does justify the requested variance for a 225 foot long pier in an area where 80 feet is the maximum • authorized length and which is extensively used by juvenile salmon. The request for variance states that proposed pier length is consistent with other piers in the neighborhood, though the pier to the immediate south of the proposed pier is less than 100 feet long. The variance request claims that 12 feet of water depth is necessary for safe moorage, though the letter does not state specifically why such a depth is required for safe • moorage. The nearshore environment of Lake Washington in this reach of the lake (lake miles 39-40) has been largely bulkheaded, and to a considerable extent occupied by piers and associated structures. For example, in 1989 this lake reach contained approximately 32 piers. Both piers and bulkheads are considered to have adverse impacts upon the nearshore environment used by juvenile salmon. Though the applicant believes that the requested variance will cause no hardship or inconvenience to the public welfare, granting the proposed variance will perpetuate a situation that has altered the nearshore habitat of the lake that is extensively utilized by juvenile salmon, a public resource. Furthermore, the City of Renton should consider the continuation of existing impacts upon aquatic resources and declining salmon stocks when piers are replaced. When the opportunity is presented to reduce the level of impact, the opportunity should.be taken. ,r 39015 172nd Avenue S.E. •Auburn, Washington 98092 • (206) 931-0652 • FAX (206) 931-0752 09/10/96 TUE 15:23 FAX 1 206 931 0752 MUCKLESHUUI FISH cvuc • Alternatives to constructing a 225 foot long pier exist and should be explored, and the need for the variance thoroughly documented and based upon current requirements of the applicant. I thank you for your attention to our concerns. If you have any questions please call me at (206) 931-0652, extension 119. Sincerely, _2_77aricali024/ eem Roderick Malcom Habitat Biologist cc: WDFW / Corps of Engineers / Regulatory tc.;',..:"ss • / ,r7.‘,.' fe'.".i.f.i.,''''T'''1,;;,...1 1°, , .-"V•,;.• ".„, '''- -- .1.,..,.e.......,e, --M S.E. •I T PL. 11 ir IARF ,SITE ..-,,,,,T...,, e.2. . 1,, . 4. . 334210 •FL • • tn . 4- ' - ''' I <I'; , /..', ere], ..rZ - ; $ -*' 1. ./*V // ,°.e.:, , 4..___. ,!nt- ----- .:.,7 I /1 :;°"?:.!12,-.1 I .1.---i Le, .e..t.7--4. •,- : : ''., ,,,'. "- t..., ''' ---- 1-d ii KIIII d "MI D • 4.. _ -4111 13 14 Alint .. . ,. • ,••• p A 413 - MI'. *.. ..0-51 1- --9 I A • 1-..• - ?,:s-.7r S.E. 92ND• - 1°::.- 1.7f,•ss'.,, kii 0 •:l -'-''''9C'(e' , - - 4 3 7 ____,,._ .,.1._._ ..___• . . ..., ..." .,.,,:,•_....,.. .. ,z ,..., (:-.' Al ,.... ,. /. .7. - I i , --- - - *. 'lint '' -: i '' .°° :"' w--z-- 1-r,-z-,•,./.... *"1:1's:. .•,,' „z, s \. 41 „f ••., 50 - 1.... / g' 4^*,.," —21-1.'-'• . f 1-,J ..->,•- ; IT \( g S.E. 93RD ST -. 211 cr irli-7,.. ,71 ----.,, , 5 4 .; :t .--'. •••• -...'• ••,'..e'.` ., D ° . , \_._s _.' \ _. ____ ••••„•••,;----•••• '71-1 5. ', At •1 -.7;'"' • gli)! ...„:„................ ...t.., ./.° A"c• 6 .. 400rarali 5 .• 1 18 19 I ....4 • listwa . ,,,s S.E. 94TH ST. • (_...5.,..... ._ • ?Gt\:77-1: 8417'1 .611 ; 11- 1-; 1 - • \ -'.„,...t, -.6.11 ",.. te•,..1 15.:0 ..,[ ..1 .it_ i .4, 'v • ...,....---. ,........--;:••;:ra P. RS tt.i ,.k'v °,. • 4.... "---. , ..,/.( 1 1'----ii 7.77 , ,) . 1 ',.,': ' .,,oT: ,1, ,....,.....„„---, •c....•„..z . , ,..., ...,\,. 1 I MI 13 I 14 i /5 1 6 I 7--- ..-!,.... - •f, • •••" -%• .., •- .,--- - ' ,......-- . ' . •4-;,,,, a a E. 95TH•ST.(z ..„. : ' ..........--A;. s •: -,.,..,..'54,Wef'.,,: -.‘'‘4A.,- •'''',,,, t ' \VT u/ 4.°. +\.•-6- . . ...• _ PR -" VICINITY PROJECT INFO. DECKING,FASTEN W/ 3 20d BOX 4x8 OF#2,FASTEN �.. " :--.,_.m ,INyPS?i.5, ,. _ GALV.NAILS @(4) W/3/8"50.z 12" _ OJ B SIT: ^::`Fr i�----L":,nrvonc/nrEra r'6-_A W/ BOAT SPIKE 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE.N -' _-; EMENDENHALL LOCATIONS EA.BD. -- G.MORd50N S.RENTON,WA. I`— - EBniN - _ frl /R SRE ADDRESS: iriNGnD.iFCErvr �IMOUNPNN MEW nv.N 6-O' • 'P ll_rL ;� 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE.N BO wsE MONwn. -� ..- - •�._ REMON.WA. - _ _.___ _ _ _ _ _--_ •:{..1 y Zf�14-'�".E'�='=•.(-�.TI!'�'''^.c_:_., ARGHRELT: 7/16I9$ LAKECvJ'�1tIll1n atil hMJ \T- <?Fh. -'-a-:1=i:;gin- r; _ __ S.M.STEMPER ARCHITECTS s.• E0si0NG ROCKBULXNEAD c' 1 -__'.E S'?.:'.r.:-."=•I:i���^ ""-- 217 PINE St.SURE 700 v No CHANGE IN SIZE OR +I - '^-...,�1 hT_'�.:".m1.--=.,_ SEATTLE.WA 98101 tV 1 I° ), y(';.r.'-.i:/2I .. -'_.�;::..F. R.,T•-1::i: ............:.�..-.:-. i�" ZONING. g0____ -1;%05ED MOORING �6 �7::_-4.:•'r.- .. ii5 'p.�• _ _ I:.'-"„;;'i:_ RESIDENTIAL '- A` PrLEs O.H.W. -. ., -'`"r___,_-.:- - 1'. _ — /I orrwne'- 000 0ENOENME 'a -�ri �:.;a:. ii__:,::;_x�-.-i-:s,T:;: ' ,(I„/.K WiuNE0F OUSTING ]00>o OUNiNNnEW nv.N I 15.13' T•��� _ - i , �' TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: DETERIORATED PIERS A' NGDV �'=7.;. ;ti� :ii�; t' ^Y 334210-3930-0 �✓ RILES TO BE REMDICD_ PROPOSED PIER RW 2x8 CEDAR ( ) /I. :..-="`f _ PR _______ '}` '•S-t (1✓Y=:_..::.'.4.n OUECTDESCRIPCION: — __ AND �[�.. FASCIA W/ '� �'R�, 1�-�'y,_'� ,;- ,.:_ � ER .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..-.._.._.._.._.._.._ _.._..-.P/L„_ 1/2"RADIUS i3a1 "_ _ PILES APPRO%MAD VILE662eEik r0 ROUNDED '. 1r5•.�.j}-r-'.+Li" I.©r• :-'JF~.'- I._`• AND TWO MOORAGE PILES.CONSTRUCT NEW 225.-0" i;'Y LY F .,' w,•1':+^ _ .. ,I PIER((G50cq.fc.)AND DRIVE IWO NEW DRAWINGS CORNERS _ "L1F:'�-)J,'€. ' \ M00 GE E A55HOWNONDRAWI AGNESSNANE _ .. 1 . i', \\C DATED7/16/96. sy• AG• NES WA VIEW AV.N �� -. I �.•._p• s ALM 10ENi RE 'R �65 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AMMRING PK. . .4:..w,. +• ,:.^ •�''i�+'] -� „e"I I LOT6465 BLOCKA PLAT:HILLMANS LAKE EXISTING nDlAtervi PIER 12°CIA.NATURAL i�1'1;�'a". a• -1. 1` WASH,GARDEN OF EDEN NO.01 6xB OF#2,FASTEN W/ I" ,•��.• 4'° er, . ,`I1`G • WOCO PILES BENTS \' II. ,•l,m, HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN#182ND DRIFDIA.x24"SPIRAL d'" .1. , >.• , 1 II II CL SH LDS DRIFT PIN SPA:ED @ 12'TYPICAL G-, ��,•„,i ', ,-iP '�a 1 I) -.1Z PLOT PLAN ,..o-r ., /\ SECTION A _ SCALE 1"=50' o 102030 40 50 © SCALE 7/2"=1'-0" LL1 H 3 - a g5 Z Z zi o f L.L.LCSLS /I MMUII`JIG]U IODU 4 CDZ o oN'e in Ili EXISTING ROCK BULKHEAD. t W LL1 (NO CHANGE IN SIZE OR • CO Z CONFIGURATION) r BESSE MENDENHALL I 30'-0" TWO NEW NATURAL WOOD OHW 21,8'-�' I3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE.N. Y MOORING PILES DRIVEN - :TON,WA. I ti TO REFUSAL -- 12"NATURAL WOOD PILES DRIVEN o OUTERIORA EXISTING_ Pp • DETERIORATED PIER AND TO REFUSAL(38 PILES TOTAL) 9 L PILES TO BE REMOVED. SLOPE 4x8 DEL#0 STRINGER TYP. REMOVE(2)EXIST. (APPROX.16629µ.ft.) ( PROPOSED PIER / (13505q.fk) EXISTING RAMP.NO — Ni ��� cn i�i u '' � -..—. -.-..-.._._-.-.._—.._._. :-.—.--— �I' ,�, � CONFIGURATION OR iI - 1TMP" F 6x8 DEL#2 CAP(TYP.) II I .CHANGE IN SIZE MOORING PILES ' A li __ _'.I II di!II u1.6 IIL.I. .II.._.._.._..-.._.._..-.._.._.._.._.._.:_.._.._.,_ _..—.._.._L_..II—.._.._.._.._.111iI1I I .. I.I u W o Pw _ 7 IF��I1 Q' Nt i�5r•0„- • • W 3,.,o i._ <N . �� �aH PIER PLAN - 7 SCALE 1/16"=1'-0" 0 8 12 16 20 © [W W ry EXISTING ROCK (J)n 225,0" _ _ BULKHEAD,(NO N A CHANGE IN SIZE OR ICI ;l 0 12"NATURAL WOOD PILES %, 12,0"fi PROPOSED PIER CON FIRGURATION) 1(�` I) is DRIVEN TO REFUSAL I TYP. (13505q.ft.) Cii KAy.�' - - _ �. APPROXIM ATE J LOCA TION N OF 0 L THE LAKE BE D .... ...... ELEVATION/SITE SECTION INNI 1 OF 1 SCALE 1/16"=1'-0" - 0 8 12 16 20 -�_ 3 7. .. • wf:4;t3.�" \ O �=: .1, se / a•d IARF SITE — .r�5_sr / „ •,.•L.4,•� . i o Z . 334210 :: "`�°� �l .n S.E S.F. •I T PL. •!!L- ,. f ,\�\S'�J( i ,717 1 a 4 .!''-'7".4C. 9 4 1 c•-r7/1 u • J _II ___ W/�i�71 • 7 \,,,m JJ .Iw /// .641! '9 ` •'wT ► fly v. 4 ::' 1‘,,,r,',.0(;'( 1,,r,4 1 2 .-___t. _�- •,, • Y le ,1 . AMA: „Mil �r i -1_ -.2p. + Y- ' .1 / � • • `I • It j CIS •.4 1IS I 1 ;�N9 s-/ ii;:'• ��-..- •• t_' so •" j.., d`r'�1 • d- }o ,r •GA-- ai t a lil F,�10t:• ,! �. ,. S s� S.E. 93RD ST -. .A l �. 9 �I ffigl. 3 L M • ,?....., .3 .4 13 /6 I, 19 /- G 1 SO M�• M[• r.. •6 � �"� � l41 1' `�°o S.E. 94TH ST,�� Y .F yJ•O 8 '1 I J ,: 1 s I s . I ��Y'��Y y� ''1" ti 'Or. , t 2 o S.E. 95TH. ST.z:. /t . c '•f. s�r 1y t� D'. M/74.4 .• So am 0. \ , '" n6 , .I Ni ., .. ogi • : • ' ° .na ,.yap 4*: �;.rirI".i. .. RECEIVED U1 2 6 1996 O DEV F BEN N ING CITY O •�. CITSc )F RENTON ••IL Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman CITY OF RENTON October 28, 1996 OCT 2 81996 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE M. W. Free Sea& Shore Construction, Inc. 1100 NW Leary Way Seattle, WA 98107 Re: MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEMENT FILE No. LUA-96-093,SM,SMV Dear Mr. Free: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the above referenced matter, which was issued on October 10, 1996, was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final by this office and the file on your application is being transmitted to the Development Services Division for further processing with the State. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kau an Hearing Examiner FJK/mm cc: Mark Pywell Sandi Seeger, Development Services Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue�,' South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 CIF)This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer STATE CITY OF I RrrON iD..:'.� Oyn y 1889 OCT 2 8 7996 �E��4• i1._6V I uCM1Nk6i STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (206) 649-7000 October 23, 1996 - I certify that I mailed a copy of this document to the persons and addresses listed thereon, postage prepaid, in a receptacle for United James D. Hanson • States mail in Bellevue,Washington on Renton Development Services oc-'"-t , 19Ct6. 200 Mill Avenue'S. Renton, WA 98055 • M. W. Free Sea and Shore Construction, Inc. 1100 N. W. Leary Way Seattle, WA 98107 Dear Mr. Hanson and Mr. Free: Re: City of Renton Permit#LUA-96-093SM 5 • MENDENHALL, BESSE- Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development/Variance Permit 1996-NW-10099 • • The Department of Ecology has reviewed the above referenced Shoreline Substantial Development/Variance Permit to replace a 6' X 225' pier on Lake Washington. We concur that the proposal, as conditioned by the City of Renton, meets the intent of the master program and the criteria set forth in WAC 173-14-150 for granting a variance. The permit is hereby approved. • This approval is given pursuant to requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. Other federal, state, or local approvals may be required. Those developments and activities authorized by the subject permit may not begin until twenty-one (21) days from the transmittal date of this approval letter, or until conclusion of any review proceeding (appeal) initiated within the twenty-one day period. You will be notified in writing if this permit is 'appealed. If you have any questions on the above action, please contact Alice Kelly at(206) 649-7129. Sincere , S , Raymond K. Hellwig, Section Supervisor Shorelands and Water - Resources Program Enclosure J A • THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY No.: 1995-NW-10099- Date received by the Department Oct. 16, 1996 Approved X Denied This conditional use/variance permit is approved by the Department pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: as conditioned by the City of Renton (6' Z (Dad) (Signature of,0aiborires1Depaths i O/ficiaD T _ 11 'as'k7{ �, CITY `)F RFNTON :iLL P.M Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor - Fred J.Kaufman October 28, 1996 M. W. Free Sea& Shore Construction, Inc. 1100 NW Leary Way Seattle, WA 98107 Re: MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEMENT FILE No. -LUA-96-093,SM,SMV Dear Mr. Free: ' The Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the above referenced matter,which was issued on October 10, 1996, was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore,this matter is considered fmal by this office and the file on your application is being transmitted to the Development Services Division for further processing with the State. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Ka an . Hearing Examiner FJK/mm cc: Mark Pywell ' Sandi Seeger, Development Services - - Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton,Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ....................... • • .... ............... : >>:;:::.;: < :I� Yalu .On the is— day of hctolDC r , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ' documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing • • • • VW Sea ev S aKsfiVU.CROv\ • • • • • (Signature of Sender) V-. �.c- � • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SII ki 1) t— — SL% c.K signed this • instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the usess,,and. purposes mentioned in the instrument. F,.�ti-, wiw 1d• Dated: /D/i �l9(p �a'• „ '' ; ; w. • .' . Notary Pub'c n and f r e State of Wa tl b'r''7, • Notary(P ' ) )/I4 4 My appointment expires: (v y " . Project Name: nvve- k,ia" P1GY` Project Number. NOTARY.DOC CIT.'. OF RENTON ma/ I Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 15, 1996 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for File No. LUA-96-093, SM, SMV, ECF Gentlemen: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on October 15, 1996. We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and call me, at 277-5586, if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, WO ?": Mark R. P I, AICP Project Manager Enclosures: Copy of Original Application Affidavit of Public Notice/Publication Site Plan SEPA Determination HEX Report cc: Office of Attorney General City of Renton, Transportation Systems City of Renton, Utility Systems City of Renton, Code Compliance Inspector Applicant Document4 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON • SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: LUA-96-093SM,SMV,ECF DATE RECEIVED: July 26, 1996 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: August 26, 1996 DATE APPROVED: October 10, 1996 DATE DENIED: N/A TYPE OF ACTION(S): [X] Substantial Development Permit [ ] Conditional Use Permit [X] Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW,the City of Renton has granted/denied a permit: This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: M. W. Free PROJECT: Mendenhall Pier Replacement DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks a Substantial Shoreline • Development Permit, a Variance, and environmental review in order to construct a six foot wide by 225 foot long pier (approx. 1350 sf). The proposed pier will replace an existing 8 foot wide by 225 foot long pier (approx. 1662 sf). Both the existing pier and the proposed pier serve a single family residence on Lake Washington. The existing pier will be removed and new piling, framing, and decking will be installed for the new pier. This pier will be two feet above the ordinary high water mark of the lake. The construction of this project will take ten days and will occur when all applicable permits have been issued. It is anticipated that the State Department of Fish & Wildlife, will establish a specific period in which the proposed construction may occur. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 64-65 Block A Plat: Hillmans Lake Wash. Garden of Eden No. 1, Hillmans LK WN Garden of Eden #1 & 2nd CL SH LDS SEC-TWNP-R: Sec 31, T24N, R5E SHRLNVAR.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Page 2 of 3 WITHIN SHORELINES OF: Lake Washington APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section Description Page 5.04 Urban Environment • page 22. 7.12 Piers& Docks page 33. Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall ensure that all construction debris and litter is properly disposed of away from the shoreline area. In order to further protect the water, all equipment shall be fueled away from the shoreline area. 2. During the removal of the existing pilings and the installation of the new pilings the applicant shall ensure that a visual as well as physical measurement of turbidity and dissolved oxygen is maintained to assure that water quality is not adversely impacted beyond the anticipated minor and short-term periods. 3. The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions established by State agencies. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) days after approval by the City of Renton Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this thirty (30) day review period have been completed. ox q2, / • P14( arming/ ild ublic Works Administrator / Date THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT DATE RECEIVED: July 26, 1996 APPROVED: October 10, 1996 DENIED: If Conditional Use, Section of the City's Shoreline Master Program authorizing the use: SHRLNVAR.DOC r ' City of Renton P/B/PW Department _ shoreline Substantial Development Permit Page 3 of 3 If Variance, Section(s) of the City's Shoreline Master Program being varied: Section 7.12.05.B.1.a. This Variance permit is approved by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall construct the pier in accordance with the plans submitted as part of this application. Any changes to those plans shall not be constructed without written permission from the City of Renton. tof 5/ 14 TP4,1 jl& ate tD ignatfe of Authorized Department Official �jj� p cc: Attorney General's Office City of Renton, Plan Review(Neil Watts) City of Renton, Surface Water Utility(Ron Straka) Applicant • SHRLNVAR.DOC AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WAS HINGTON) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES . , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 10th day of October ,1996, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. • Signature: - 6 � SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 10 44 day of) ?LO (. , 1996. Notary Public an r the State.of Washington, residing at i14*7� ,therein. Application;Petition, or Case No.: Mendenhall Pier Replacement LUA-96-093,SM,SMV The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT October 10, 1996 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: M. W.Free Sea& Shore Construction,Inc. Mendenhall Pier Replacement File No.: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV • LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue N SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks Substantial Shoreline Development Permit_and Variance to replace an existing 8 foot by 225 foot long pier with 6 foot by 225 foot long pier. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with • conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on September 4, 1996. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following,minutes are a summary of the September 24, 1996 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, September 24, 1996, at 9:02•a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record:• Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity Map/Pr.oposed construction application,proof of posting,proof of publication and diagram other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Letter from Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to Mark Pywell dated September 10, 1996 The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by MARK PYWELL,Project Manager,Development Services, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant requests a Substantial Shoreline Development Permit and a Variance after environmental review to allow the construction • M. W. Free Sea& Shore Construction,Inc. Mendenhall Pier Replacement File No.: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV October 10, 1996 Page 2 of a 6 foot wide, 225 foot long pier of approximately 1,350 square feet. This will replace an existing pier the same length but 8 feet wide. The existing pier serves a single family residence..The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)on August 20, 1996. The applicant will need to comply with the mitigation measures during the construction of the pier. This is a shoreline variance and there are some established criteria that the staff has reviewed. In reviewing the criteria the first is that the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions apply to the subject property or the intended use thereof, and do not apply generally to the other properties in the same vicinity. As can be seen on Exhibit 2,the shoreline itself as it extends out remains very shallow and to get to the 12 foot depth it is necessary to have the pier 225 feet in length. The shoreline ordinance would normally'limit a pier to 80 feet in length and 12 feet in depth. The 80 feet in length would leave this pier in about 3-1/2 to 4 feet of water at the mean high water mark,which means during the summer when the pier would get its most significant use the water would be shallower than that. The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights,of the applicant possessed by owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. Again, staff would note that the length is necessary to make the 12 feet of depth which is generally the depth that most piers in the vicinity are stopped at, and again,the length is justifiable due to the fact that this area of the lake has a very shallow shoreline. The applicant does own a boat that will be moored here and that does require the greater depth. The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shoreline in the same vicinity. This pier will actually be smaller than the existing pier, and a different mooring system will be used which will not have the finger piers but will just be pole moored. Staff is not aware of any complaints the City has received on the existing pier or any problems associated with it. The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the master program which is to limit piers to the minimum length that will allow them to be useful to the owners, and staff believes in this case the applicant has met that requirement. The granting of the variance will not cause harm to the general area and will allow the applicant to continue the use of its property in a manner similar to its neighbors that do not have the extended shallow water area as part of the lake frontage. Therefore, staff would recommend approval of the Mendenhall pier replacement variance subject to the condition that the applicant comply with the ERC mitigation measures. A letter was received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and they did not express significant issues on their rights, but asked that the City ensure that the length of the pier was justifiable. Staff has talked with the applicant's representative and feels assured that due to the boats that the applicant owns and will be mooring here and that traditionally have come to this pier,that the depth and the length is justifiable. The Muckleshoots did indicate that they are also appreciative of the fact that the applicant has made an effort to reduce the size of the pier and the method of construction. M. W. FREE, 1100 N.W. Leary Way, Seattle, Washington 98107, applicant herein, explained that typically the pilings are cut off,they are not pulled out. Under-water air saws are used to cut them off at the mud line so that reduces the turbidity. The estimated length of time for the project to be completed would be ten days. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:20 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION • M. W. Free Sea& Shore Construction,Inc. _ Mendenhall Pier Replacement File No.: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV October 10, 1996 Page 3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,M.W. Free, for Besse Mendenhall, filed a request for approval of a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and a Variance from the Shoreline Management Act to construct a 225 foot long pier into Lake Washington. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located 3007 Mountain View Avenue North. 6. The subject site is located on the shoreline of Lake Washington. The site is located west of Lake Washington Boulevard and north of NE 30th Street(as extended). 7. A large majority of the subject site is submerged below the surface of the.lake. An existing home is located on the site. The site is already served by an older pier which would be replaced if this permit is approved. The existing pier is also 225 feet long but is 8(eight)feet wide. The proposed pier would be only 6 feet wide. . 8. The existing pier is old and will be replaced by a new pier with new piling,framing and decking. The existing pier has finger piers where the boat is moored. These finger piers are perpendicular projections , of the pier structure. This creates additional overwater structures. The new pier will use pilings, a more open arrangement,to secure moored boats. 9. The construction will be monitored and the appropriate construction windows will be used to ensure that activity does not interfere with migrating salmon. 10. The water depth in this shoreline area is very shallow. In order to achieve a'navigable water depth of 12 feet,the pier would be extended out as far as the existing pier. 11. An existing pier to the south is approximately 100 feet long. - CONCLUSIONS: • 1. The Variance provisions of the Shoreline Master Program permit a variance in certain circumstances. The criteria are that: M. W. Free Sea& Shore Construction,Inc. Mendenhall Pier Replacement File No.: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV October 10, 1996 Page 4 Upon proper application, a substantial development permit may be granted which is at variance with the criteria established in the Renton Master Program where, owing to special conditions pertaining to the specific piece of property,the literal interpretation and strict application of the criteria established in the Renton Master Program would cause undue and unnecessary hardship or practical difficulties. The fact that the applicant might make a greater profit by using his property in a manner contrary to the intent of the Master Program is not by itself sufficient reason for a variance. The Land Use Hearing Examiner must find each of the following: a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property, or to the intended use thereof,that do not apply generally to other properties on the shoreline in the same vicinity. b. The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. c. The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to. property on the shorelines in the same vicinity. d. The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program. e. The public welfare and interest will be preserved; if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it,the variance will be denied,but each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development'is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the provisions of this Master Program. 2'. Lake Washington's rather shallow depth waterward from the shoreline makes it hard to dock and utilize all but very shallow draft and therefore small boats. Eighty feet from shore the water only reaches a . water depth of four feet when the water level is high. During summer or dry periods the water depth is even lower and sometimes the bottom is exposed. This would preclude use of all but small boats and in some cases, leave boats high and dry. This is a unique aspect of the area in which the subject site lies. 3. In order to make use of the water-side nature of the site and to allow use of even a moderate sized boat, a variance that permits a pier of greater than the usual 80 foot length is necessary. A longer pier is necessary in order to reach water that is 12 feet in depth. The fact that an existing pier already exceeds the 80 feet shows that historically this site needs a longer pier to achieve a reasonable water depth. 4. Since this pier'replaces one of equal length but provides a narrower width and eliminates the additional finger pier protrusions and similar longer piers already serve portions of the lake, approval will not be unnecessarily detrimental to either the public welfare or other properties in this area. ' 5. The Master Program has already made allowances for single family homes along the lakeshore. Piers have been considered normal accessory uses. The pier is in harmony with the purposes of the program. 6. The replacement of the wider pier by this one will actually reduce the impact and reduce the harm. It should be approved. M. W. Free • Sea& Shore Construction,Inc. Mendenhall Pier Replacement File No.: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV October 10, 1996 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION: • The Variance from the Shoreline Management Program is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. ,The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. The applicant shall comply with.all construction conditions by the State agencies. ORDERED THIS 10th day of October, 1996. 4-77,140.04.. FRED J. KA HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of October, 1996 to the parties of record: Mark Pywell M. W. Free Peggy DuBois 200 Mill Avenue S 1100 NW Leary Way 2907 Mt. View Avenue N Renton,WA 98055 Seattle; WA 98107 Renton,WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of October, '1996 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney James Chandler,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writine on or before 5:00 p.m.,October 24, 1996. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written • request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities'or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. " M. W. Free Sea& Shore Construction, Inc. Mendenhall Pier Replacement File No.: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV October 10, 1996 Page 6 • If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process,include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested_parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 2%6 CEDAR DECKING.FASTEN - VICINITY. - PROJECT INFO. ' W!3 20d BOX , 4a8 DF la FASTEN ��'' L. �{ —� GALV.NAILS @(4) W/3/B'50.%12' a JOB 51TE: •' la---_,,,,JJJ/// BILE NENDENNALI • ' '1 --_ --"1 LOCATIONS EA BD. '/ BOAT5PIKE '3007 MOUNTAINNEW OVEN= '> ' �-�jt c moms. f RENiON,WA {///A WE APPLE55: _ 4--- `e.a:�vi.,... u WWI..w.f .'s 6'•D' .: ..y- .:_:;,` ••{Y 'JDQ/MDUNTAw VIEW AMEN MON,u1. I _ _• .4..?A,T.F.""'\ RENfON WA .r / V I:.�r--P,ZQ %12^-E ' MUOIEGT: 7/16 196 9 LAM WA Y.N111(if.061 \ Tr+T�r+-t}.'+�.•+!!� .�{L� •i' fi.M.fiIEMIE[ARLMITEGfS :, InS,Ks VA.RUM.AO - X n 1 1'' "_=_ - --__ sEAR�E�wA D5101 r O c"•r:.1x5.g OR * •. -�y'y:.�r ;=2L•v-..:s x17 cc•RtwIG, .s _-` {. ilR' i/I,x:�1.iaQrT=1 ZONING. .�.._.._..�.._._.._._.._..�.._._.._.._ i TIC. I 'E - ./-.Kia.:1.—_.r.,. .!..5 il':.N ION x1NNRo.w1 I H.W ti :?..Y;� ._. _ : Mo:w,AR,atrA..N • IN1i .13 � = 4.-•(uNRa fi u6w. 4N,WM � _.':Fii.'uNiuArvuneR I NGDV) r �. - ?`aeH-+�•-__,•.;=i+,.�-;,�, b •REs,oeE wRAiu, rRwouD ma, yB CEDAR b• :.�•-n:i;:_ . Ijl ROJELT DESCRITDN. 1(L_••I I AP vs,. \\�'4'y'.T^..:„. [EuovEEnsnrlvErE[w[ATEDnE[ANo . • �.' .< -..? BILES(AMOnNTFtr 165xR M1. at.. ROUNDED !� ^,Y. d.X - _ +\~ 1�,1 J,: U Y' _- Y 1` AND TWO MOORAGE VIM NEW • j b ._.:_225 CrCORNERS I, •1 `_- •T-4"1 LET. :o_ �\ I�' 1`� NE[(135O.q AS SHOW°WONEW '1, Ip�vI���T-�� 7�' LIEN NLE5 AS SHOWN ONO[AWV1fs5 n, • WU N011„AN My Y.N -''` {,a • N •E 1{ • 9:y_{ DATED7/10150. # • '1I os•:. •� •-4: it I e Fe I L.•\ 1EGAL DEScavNON: . / 'vw�..v:. wy i_„ii— 12'CIA-NATURAL p L ' �".1L L0104.63 elaa A rur,wiLMANS uaF I_wT•Y•�- 6118 OF/2,FASTEN W/ 1'• 4.•"",}��,{T-y' ' WASN.G BLOCLi RAT. . 3/4'DIA.a 24'SPIRAL WOC7 PILES DENTS 11.1'y.ax.��.�� ^�^j� • :�'��y III % \ NRNAN51[WN GAROEN DEEPEN II/mND DRIFT FIN - 5PA':ED@12'TYPICAL . 9• •3,'!•,,:' -K I'I,.••.4,„ " ,,'t/A Li Ee SN UN: j z O I, PLOT PLAN ��� /\ SECTION A _ SCALE t"=50' - 0 10:o ao a 50 © SCALE 7/2'■7'-0' • LLI `a t 0 z z =i c vs' a L DL $� 0 0 �.42''��r�5r�ar�,r.�,y <'o _.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. _.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._._.._.._.?�.._.._.._.._.._.._ a in EXISTING KOCK BULKHEAD: • Z I (NO CHANGE IN SIZE OR . b. CONFIGURATION)- , ', . - a. • BESSE MENDENHALL - - ' 30'•0' - TWO NEW NATURAL WOOD OHW 21.8';-�_1 13007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE.N.I Y�MOORING PILES DRIVEN "•'//` I ��'y TO REFUSAL • • *---�-- -I OUTLINE OF EXISTING 12'NATURAL WOOD PILES DRIVEN • DETERIORATED PIER AND TO REFUSAL(38 PILES TOTAL) • c)_ - I L PILES TO BE REMOVED. I'iPE V (APPROX.1662M..f4.) - 4X8 DFL/:STRINGER(TYP.) PROPOSED PIER '` REMOVE(2)E%15T. I / (1350egfF.) ' EXISTING RAMP.NO _ MOORING PILES I 4a_12'-./ 6aB DFI/2 CAP(7YP.) iCMANGE IN 512E OR A. I �• 1 . I Y I*, I CONFIGURATION II II ii :1-I I'�1 .. __._ ._.._ _._ •--_'- - _ :. 4 , - 1 .. ._.._. ._._ ._._. ._ _.'�� 1 _�.._._.._ .._ .._.._i_.._.._.._ _.._.._ _.._.PAL.._.._.._.._.._.._ o • �� • c 226'-0,... a.... - „ • Q • .. , - P ' N [ • PIER PLAN - .. /\ • N• 7 • SCALE 1116"_r-o" • - .p 8 12 16 20 © -.- • W • . Z_ . - EXISTING ROCK 4 22g'-0" _. —_..-._.. .. ___._ .___. .. BULKHEAD.(NO ' - n. S... _..._... .. ._._—___.. .-..._. .—_ _ .._.._. CHANGE IN OR ' . b 12'NATURAL WOOD PILES 12'-_Q' PROPOSED PIER - - CONFIRG IN SIZEN) iv DRIVEN TO REFUSAL �\ TMP• 4' (1350sq.R.) OHW 21.8' �- - --- , • 1 APPR%N OF J 0 LOCATION OF' L GEL 0 ' AK ED THE EB EL ..................................:............................ . 1 ELEVATION/SITE SECTION ' - - - . 1 OF 1 SCALE 1/16"..1'•0" 0 8 12 16' 20 Cov4VWEAVYI, Sew i c,e,8 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-093, SM, SMV, ECF Applicant: Sea & Shore Construction (M.W. Free) Project Title: Mendenhall Pier A:� Environment impact: No comment. B Architect to conduct structural observation on pile driving; connections deemed structural, through coordination with the contractor; write letter to•building official certifying that construction meets the approved plan; conduct a final inspection with the building inspector. C.: Untreated piling, unless treatment is approved by the building official: H:dev.svcs\dev&plan.ing`96-493 • • I ($1T OF o57-Av\:-11 .d� DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY;/X to SEATTLE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS A �, P.O. BOX 3755 CITY OF RENTON \1\ + �,� � SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9 8 1 24-225 5 RECEIVED ;� �r f ‘P REPLY TO 1 .ATEE�. ATTENTION OF SEP ,3 0 1996 . Regulatory Branch DEVELOP MEJ I sanvlc; 1996 ,ION SEP I0 [ @IFQ rE Lid UV] J 199& 0 Ms . Besse Mendenhall 3007 Mountain View Ave N Hyll '` ON Renton, Washington 98056-2516 a_ ' WER Reference: 96-1-01480 ' Mendenhall, Besse • Dear Ms . Mendenhall: ' You are hereby authorized to construct a pier and drive piling in Lake Washington, at Renton, Washington. The work must be performed as depicted on the enclosed drawings (enclosure 1) , and you must meet the enclosed conditions (enclosure 2) . Please pay particular attention to "Special Conditions" a. 'through f. . ' We have .reviewed your application for a Department of 'the Army permit- for-this -work. Our ;review .was made pursuant to. Section 10 of the Rivers-and Harbors ;Act -of March 3,.,:1899 We. determined. that your proposal_; is•_,minor in nature, _.will.-not •significantly '.impact ........ .. : . , _ environmental values, .and should;,encounter=;.no'..opposition.,: We"are thus issuing ou a 1,Letter of Permission - to . authorizethe..work : .rather.- . , . than using .our lengthier public-notice-.procedures.,. .: : ., .. :. . Please note the conditions and limitations contained in enclosure 2 . Read them carefully. You should also be aware that any changes in the location or plans for this work will require submittal of a revised drawing to this office, and our written approval, prior to accomplishment. .If piling are to be used• for your project, the use of noncreosote piling is .required in freshwater. Extreme care shall be taken to prevent any petroleum products, chemicals, or other toxic or deleterious materials from entering the water. If a spill does occur, or if an oil sheen or distressed or dying fish are observed in the project vicinity, work shall cease immediately and the Department of Ecology shall be notified of such • conditions . Contact Ecology' s Northwest Regional Spill Response Office at (206) 649-7000. While you need no further authorization from us, you must still . , comply„with,.other local and„State requirements. . .-At a minimum, you must-obtain a Shorelines Substantial Development .permit determination from:.the".city of",Renton and a~HydrauI.ic,"RrojectApproval from the-„,... Washington-_State :Department" of Fish'..and Wildlife,. . and you must- contact the Washington State Department ' ofNatural 'Resources '.for ,a . _ determination of. leasing, requirements for submerged lands -before you begin. your- work..- . . . . , . . . -2- Please also be aware that certain Indian tribes assert that they have a right to attach nets to piers, docks, wharves, and other structures authorized by Department of the Army permits. BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: Donald T. Wynn Colonel, Corps of Engineers District Engineer Enclosures cc: INTERIOR NOAA DNR STATE COORDINATOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTI h • • • VICINITY PROJECT INFO. • • r'•'"".u..F:.....r.....r,.,,.,rv^...,„i,l iL1g,.'�.. •^ ,.,.. ,..,. 'a;'r n.di ^ -- _ p ,IO6 SITE: � :,. s ..,. ,,. OWNER: .- 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N .w� ~'vi'" •••,,' i.4 ,.- * ' BESSE MENDENHALL • i-: RENTON, WA. - "�,,.'4•%',-; _ 11 SITE ADDRESS: �'F - F="••':�-`"a'' — Z 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE.N • -_�;' ;7;..; . ::57. :1;«:..::: ti` .: RENTON,WA. .in""nl: — ....:i:�w,;,•' '�.�«,•',may.... :'a> \•\.►. � A a 'I}:�u'C: �.;y� „. :. : °�:::;;��•. ..,�,._.,,�...,,�.,....; ..�,• ....,:.��^�-;:�•�`�-ss�,.n... � ARCHITECT: M a•=a'•:.';; "-: sib: :^-.;4 n; ▪ 5:9 74:j;;,.._ • _____ 'd 71 S.M.SSTEMPEERARCHITECTS d ~V7•...":::;ii%`4%.41":7;ar;•%!^:"."31141:V..: ..M Ne ,••:. %:. •V,f����� ;;;SSE:•iw,.:...:: 217 PINE ST.SUITE 700 _ ":i,c';;•o-M I ... .,: ;,,s•...,;;,,,5, rw.;,;:: .: .��+..ti:1. r 9EATTLE,WA•88101 :ems .I � . 4 4, � .;;...':. : ..;... I. ,.... ,:..,. ,:::::;:,�x•... '` .r • .,i:;M:"P:;?:r : :�' :A 4'M 1.5,il'js ,r'!w-^' »: .! • ZONING: 19l .4141.4'I..\, r t'•l y:s�' t..�:.rrg;;: l::,l ;:::;. ae!:::.:�,.9t.';:::,w::.::Y;• !+fir, `>' •f ^ a-,; :: - ii.21• 2^. :% vi,_.:z : :%' : °.7 .1 �., I Sunny"..., Ztir;r,s :'::::::" ;� . .^," ' FF.ttr ^«••z: »i� ''4 g. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: �.., ; • � s.V:,�„�:.:.. r x. 334210-3930.0 1. • u sl.',. ' ^W2 :"'M�'c 1':,. „:.:::7=°.::':s,; • : . _ ;� PROJECT DESCRIMON: �::� ti """ • ::z '^' =,e•� REMOVE EXISTING DETERIORATEDAND '�e" ss i 0:,!(:.1 `` \, a's. �•• ;x:•._ .7• G r.: �i. `. PIER .- :\`n � a — :4.4s. ;. PILES(APPROXIMATELY 1062e ft.) '5•4 NI "a..„ ;▪ �i °'H.:. AND TW MOORAGE `s ,t ti, 'i !�• 1�F 44r---"9 --! ,,4,,. . �'~ _ ,:>::^ : � .!�� 0 . OORAGE PILES. CONSTRUCT NEW li',: `�•si.l;f l� �;t; ,,i '—.., us`.i'';r u�•c f„�" . `I PIER(1350sq ft.)AND DRIVE 7W ,, T „ :: i r ewn4w 0 NEW 1%}.k.n . -` a •!:. '"�_ •• n sr_ I•. rl ` • s \r MOORAGE PILES AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS r �•1 1M1,�r,,.lt °~� ' I �ti .,m� rrrE.iv , ,Y' 00[e4 �` 4 4E1'r ' l\: •��.j�s .-i, t�,4...1.�,sit -,�=L`'i ^t 1'.. 'r,rm, \\ ./ IV DATED 7/16/96. • c'ir.,'• ,- -5^.11\:. .,• .^Ta ^�—tr�Tgf."^'�J u.4-''•�1 •;+'off'•. ...r:.rt_ ___Z }...-,1� .. ,.fil, � • ''n y �a; "-; , i'ailila;s " ,, r., •7 .i w is 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: t S,I'L; 1i: y..Ci , '4- '•'.'�I.t, ;' '.'+ , ,I ql ,1 ITN a tr �g`i, C ,�N�0jSi2••r` �a 12 I. , �;: ,tilt:> -'t ; I:• u• • I:;:� LOT 64-35 BLOCK A PLAT: HILLMANS LAKE \ru.1,1:t: ,I s , '.-:.uY ,..;,1 .i f�,i 3't;am �.,.. ,.I I i!:..: Ir ,, 'v WASH.GARDEN OF EDEN NO. 01 .,‘Pre,a 34A c1Sl%I TY,;,,: yr 1L�y ?I= sllzso,••st a'' `A' a WN GARDEN OF EDEN#1 &2ND v.' = Z,n�y..M1arri, S}('AvAy '.,.\,41 .v.1:op, 'iv ; I'.:%,* `1 ..i'`■ 4, ,. -IF � • � HILLMANS LK c gat :.,/ �,4 y.°" ai I I,,.,; /, .t CL SH LDS 1' V 3:!!,i:j:tk!•L �n.�Il al "1.} �, r.! ':'eit4otie.s •• 1`fzi —I \'Iv, • . Pe C : g - I-0 I Y .V . PURPOSE: REMOVE EXIST.DETERIORATED MISC.PIER& PILES BESSE MENDENHALL - (APPROX. 1662sq.ft.). CONSTRUCT NEW PIER (1350sq.f;,) AS SHOWN 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV. N. IN DRAWINGS. IN :LAKE WASHINGTON • DATUM:0.0 EST. BY C.OE. 1919 -.. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: AT:RENTON 0G. MORRISON COUNTY OF: KING STATE:WA 3011 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. C2.) AGNES SHANE APPLICATION BY:BESSE MENDENHALL 3033 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. • . SHEET: 1 OF 4 DATE:7/23/96 1 ' .I� -- 7.;;... ..I �<iS'ING ADJACENT r<:vK.... .�.. .- 0 IS N t • .% « aM RR 0 ,::': :; ' — -„ EXIS11Ne•AajA�ENT• 70N 11 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N . • L^ 7.' 80:VH0USE; REN .. b. . ,•. -EXfo,NG'.RC.CK F31UL..ME.gG;i:....... • 0 0 :• • . . .'NQ.0 AN�-'INSIa01. . : .� . ••— ..— — — —• — :C NPIGURATIi1+N— — — — p/i_.,.._ ........::..:....••:::........_._.. i:.:...:...,•.....:....aJ Qt!,.. ....'•.•.:. ... PROPOSER MOORIPICe..:•::; :':.' •� . .: ..... .. .' :�i �. . .. f�.'. ... ,(..�._.:__.:_..... ,• p ', I. :,.. .. :`• :: :• OH.V21:3:; :' 8E55E MENDENHALL ?�—:..A� . I C 11]INE O E?(15TiNG:.':: ': :•', ;;:;; ::. 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N W 1 �;..I . 0 T'cD:PE?e:.::': : RENTO WA. l - RI0Ri1 ; .• N ..�...... •;................... -!'/L: •••-•• — — — — ••- - •-••- - -- - --:--'-- ...—..—..!'/L.— p. ` `:, .::.rw•.::w ' : : •.:; ... iNVIEW Ay, RENTO A. • MOCRiht�?LDS' N W N . .� • ,. _ E'/.ISTING-Aq A E\f FR ........... .. PLOT PLAN SCALE 1" = 50' 0 10 20 30 40 50 t Pc : f‘- I- a IV - PURPOSE: REMOVE EXIST.DETERIORATED MISC. PIER&PILES BESSE MENDENHALL (APPROX. 1662sq.ft.). CONSTRUCT NEW PIER(1350sq.ft.)AS SHOWN 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N. IN DRAWINGS. IN :LAKE WASHINGTON DATUM:0.0 EST. SY C.OE. 1919 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: AT:RENTON C) G. MORRISON 3011 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE.N. CQUN1`f OF; KING STATE:WA 2 AGNES SHANE APPLICATION BY:BESSE MENDENHALL 3033 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. SHEET: 2 OF 4 DATE:7/23/96 • 2x6 CEDAR ---- DECKING, FASTEN W/ (3) 20d BOX / 4x8 DF #2, FASTEN GALV. NAILS @ (4) / W/3/8"SQ.x 12" LOCATIONS EA. BD. 6, BOAT SPIKE 1. Q„ ;/ fiX 1. +I• I rn1 ,,' 4 . (, 11 f � 1 � M ! ) 1 I j I o.H.w . • y � /' 15.13' (/'t Ii il! . 2x8CEDAR - 'FASCIA W/ i ;; k / r i 1 1/2" RADIUS t �I I ' ' / / ROUNDED I (! 1 I j 4 CORNERS I i ti j %fit } (. 1 ., t / 's j ( 6x8 OF#2, FASTEN W/ rI / 12" DIA. NATURAL 3/4" PIA.x 24" SPIRAL WOOD PILES BENTS DRIFT PIN SPACED @ 12'TYPICAL . SECTION A - SCALE 1/2" = 1 '- 0" . Rcf : ?6- I- 0 / Yro .. PURPOSE: REMOVE EXIST.DETERIORATED MISC. PIER&PILES BESSE MENDENHALL • (APPROX. 1662sq.ft.). CONSTRUCT NEW PIER (1350sq.ft.)AS SHOWN 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N. IN DRAWINGS. IN :LAKE WASHINGTON DATUM:0.0 EST. BY C.OE. 1919 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: AT:RENTON 0 G. MORRISON COUNTY OF: KING STATE:WA 3011 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. 0 AGNES SHANE APPLICATION BY:BESSE MENDENHALL 3033 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. SHEET: 3 OF 4 DATE:7/23/96 , - I . . . . ..., • . . . . .• • 1,-,1,- -I , • . i • •• . ' • • .. . . • - . . . .. . . . .. ; . .• .• . . . - % AV.1.1VAI-21-13[Nriged '. : • • \\ ,-.q. - -) . . . - -\.\L--..._.._._..•_..- ..._.._.._.._.:._.._...„..._..-....'._.....-: ..-.•...-1.._..---...._. .._.• . •J. _.._.._.._•.PA- .._.._.._ ' •i. • . - - - . • .• . • !. . . .Exisilt* a%incri-Nia.--:-... .• .. . . . . . . - • : •. . ipionima-KiNtira•OP :. ----- • o • . • • : • - CONfIGRAII014)1 , -•I . . .• . , . • . i ' . - . • . . . - - - - OE.55E ICE HPENITALL 1 • '- • 3007 MAXIM rAINIIEW AVE.N. 1 ../_-____..(2"_ir .__.....;:. WON tW NATURAL WOOF) . • i . : . 21.8 --;-..__...... - ..... AlOOKI140 ntt5 KIVEN TO - • - PEI-41A M. .: I ! ------."'--- 14e• gEft1.0.1. . . , . .. -01fitilll:Cf EA1'.....111,4• : . . 1. ----_ .,__._7_ .: Is- 7 .. . I / • : ,--1Z'WAWA.WOOP rae5 ORKE11 TO ..I .o, _____:,.__...;:_--,.---.: r..._ / .PETEPW.ATEfe PeEK ANI) • - i . . •://- . EFI... AL Op!ILES 1009•.. .'.• . i. . • ' ..- . •: - •• . • (3: •:. • .'• : : • i• ..y rit.Ee SO 13E.nku.wf..9. • 41.ov,F :. . , . „„-.47.13 0 Ft:42 5110/10ER(TYP4 • ' "Ig'r•---- . 2 .?- PE1.40A 4:2)EY.I5T. (A.."I'IP0.4.1i-.O2t:orit.) '. / ' . ! '"--PPOPOOEOPIER.. ' ' • . . . •-, ' / il.:).'ek 046!ILK, /lr'2.-fr'/ Oft.e2 car(nrp„) • • ,. . 03504i.fv_) . . ---E.kli,I INC Zri,,r.td... • / . t.11.4.4.":4 IN:5 CI iq\-i- ' ' • 1 4 1 TYR. I / , r • . ' • a:4a i•ii.v.riew !Ptg?: 41ji . *".11r,it.'4'.-j7,'".,:%. fiki.":!"..-.'.1,-imbi ii! 1=1._,.!.4.as.,Z,c Viiirll:-. -•••••.:•e,;:nM;::•.•-•:;.-E*11-T,2-••-•Ii:''':-•1‘--:-Vis I. ,:•-:- •-•::•.ILIP :Th.q..2j21•1:1•••-•_IrItit:It..7.P.t.i:.i2 VIA l'i i..:ilifAIN.=..: 1 ---_ "111114°. ff,...v:..:.!;.:..id;,:iiil::.:;',41411:iii.!..f'41'rilr• 'Eli.ii..P ''•''':i••:_;11.3!i • •..•-14,;•441/4. .••..;•...•.•,..... •.y•........;•... ....••......;••.., •• ••... ..••......•:.. •••••,.•-••;;....•••.....;••4.•••••.,. ....•...L.•:.••. :;.•;... ........ •..;a4..ire•.....•....i........4';..,••••...... .,;...••• .;;:., ...-....-;:i::.. •Eil.•• 9•18=N.•• • ; . • • . • . . .....•. . . . .. . .. . • • • .. . . r t : • . . : . • .. )e.' . . . • .• :- • .--------•- • .. • • • • - •. . .. • . .... • . . .. ••-•- • . . . . . • ...• .-. , ,i 1.- . . • .. • •. . • .•• - . . • . . - . . . • . • . • - . • . . .. .. .• -.- •• .... . . . .. . . • • • . •• . . . . • . . .. • • • . , .• . . . . . . . . ... : . . • • . .. .. . ... - . •. . .. . -• • . . . . ... . .. . . .. • .. . • •• • • -..- • • . -. • •• _ .• PIER PLAN 1-1 SCALE 1" = 301-0" . . , EK5101G--2OCK _ .1. 225,-4r -.--/e /-13111.1IIIAO.(440 --- ------ _____ ,b I i / ClikKGE IN.511C! 12'NATURA1 VeJCV P11.115 s• / YL,e ,,--PR.OPOSE0 MIER LbNIWOJKA1010 i.% \ ", 111'. ' (1360tii.k.) I PRIWN TO REIUSAL ,. / / .• e .0 e e e i _ c" _ li - - - 44 .1, 1 , , ...•••• •••• .• "•• % ..1 % ..• '..i• •••• .1.. 1' ‘ • -.... tsi ,',.. ‘ • ... ‘ • • 1 1. 1/1"1.'S."11%'•11."•*.11:?:WZ':':4"::":'::'1/::/ZdZ':"'S.*i\":":"\;::".1.1:s"‘"%"‘"%"%''.1%' la)..11:3N Ct. \ ./ ./ 1 / .1 / 1 ./ ./ ./ 11 / .11 .. • • ... 1 f I 1 1. / 0. .0 / .0 .1 r A / .1 / e .ree I I 1 I 1 / I / I%l%.1%1%•:'...s.0:s''' 1 % % s. % % s. s. S. N • 1 1 N. 1 1 1. S. l % • s. •. S. • s.. 1 1 \ 1 1 "I. %. 1 1 ‘ 1. • • l s. N. ... N. ... s. .... N. ..,, 1 1 s. 1 • '1/4 • -• S. s. • • 1 N*1 . . e e / I / • • • / .1 e 0. / / / / e e .1 e e e e e e / .0 i % % % % % % f / 1 % % 1 .1 1 I / W /.1.1 .0 / i 1 • / 1 r 1 / ./ ..r • • • • • s. ,I. • • % • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 1. %. • • S. 1 , 1. 1 ‘. \ 1 1 ss • - • 1. ' 1 1 • 1 .1/4 1 • '1/4 • 1 '1/4 1 % " • • •-• • " " ." ' ' 1 .1 " " 1 ' ../ / / / .1 /'i / 1 / / / 1 I ! 1 40 1 .0 / ./ / 1 .• / / .0 ! / II / 1.1-/ / %"1 / 1 1' 1 I 1 I .0'Is/ .1-1 I .1.I* 1 ".. i! /. " .e '% I " 11 1 " ' " . .... -r% '.. %P.'. ...0% '.. % % ... % N N ‘ N._N. % % S % % % % % s. %. % % % % % % 1 • 1 • • • • S. \ % • 1. % • • • s. 1/4 • • S. 1 1. 1 • s. • • s. 1 s. l S. 1 1. • '1/4 s. S. S. 1 1 • 1 • 1 • 1 S. ...`,.e.s.es:/..... s ..- ... -'‘,. 's. ." . ' .... - • / / 1 / 1 I 1 / 1 % % ,- # ,,• 1 1 / 1 / / I I / d, 1' i i e I I. Ge ' 1 / • I 1 / .0 / e e'e e e / ' , el " , 0- I 1 I 1 / / I I 1' / .1*-.0 1 .1 a' / / / IS-0\.1s.1 .1%/s../ d'e 1 I 0-%1‘.1%.‘e's 1%.1%1'/'.,NI% ELEvATioNisiTE SECTION SCALE 1" = 301-0" - /e. . . 6-/- / Yg. - PURPOSE:REMOVE EXIST.DETERIORATED MISC.PIER& PILES BESSE MENDENHALL COUNTY OF: KING. STATE:WA (APPROX. 1662sq_11). CONSTRUCT NEW PIER(1350sq.11.)AS SHOWN IN 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N. DRAWINGS. IN:LAKE WASHINGTON . APPLICATION BY:BESSE MENDENHALL DATUM:0.0 EST.LW C.OE. 1919 . - AT:RENTON SHEET: 4 OF 4 DATE:7/23196 • , • CONDITIONS FOR LETTERS OF PERMISSION General Conditions: 1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on • . If you find that you-need more time to complete the authorized activity, sub— mit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least 1 month before the above date is reached. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish -to cease to maintain the authorized acti— vity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain 'a modification of this permit from this office, which may, require restoration of the area. - • 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immedi— ately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and State coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort, or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain a • written statement from the new owner in which the new owner agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of this permit. A copy of the written statement must be forwarded to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions, to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the cer— tification is attached if it contains ,such conditions. 6. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit. Further Information: 1. The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer. RGBR/386 2. Limits of this authorization. a. ' This permit ,does not obviate the need to obtain other. Federal , State, or local authorizations +requi.red by law. b:.r This: permi"t' doe's not:-grant"any .:property rights 'or ,excltis ive pi ivile es. c.. This permit does not authorize .any, .injury, to-, the_ property,or..rights of other's.' . .•,,,- .. :.r... .. .. . :., _ , „d. _,This;permit,does not ,authorize interference' with •any existing or .pro- posed Federal-project. 3. ;Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Govern- ment does not assume any liability for the following: a. Damage to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes. b. Damages'to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf of the United States in the public interest. c. , Damages to persons, property, or to -other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity authorized by this- permit. s de ''Design-:o'r' cor.st=ruction sdefic'iencies -assor_iatedwith the 'permitted work. e. Damage claims associated with any future modification,`stispenLsion, or revocation .of :.this...permit... „ 4. Reliance on Applicant's. Data The'determinatior.,of this office that issu- ance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided. 5. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may, reevaluate its decision on this -permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. b. The .information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete,' or inaccurate (See 4 above). c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation procedures contained' in 33" CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5. The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an 2 administrative order requiring you to comply with the terms and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. . You will be required to pay for any corrective measures ordered by this office, and if-you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations- such as.those specified in: 33 CFR' 209'.170). accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill, you for the cost. 6' 'Extensions: General condition l 'eestablishes a time -limit for completion of the activity authorized by this permit. ' Unless there are circumstances requiring either a prompt' completion of the authorized .. -act'ivity' ora- reevaluation of. the 'public,interest decision; ' the Corps will normally give favorable consideration to a request for- an extension of this time limit. Special Conditions: a. You must provide'a copy, of the letter of permission and drawings to all contractors performing any of the authorized work. b. Your use of the permitted activity must not interfere with the public's right to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States. c. You must install and maintain, at your own expense, any safety lights, signals and/or other markings on piling prescribed by the United States Coast Guard (USCG) , through regulations or-otherwise, on your authorized facilities. • d. No .activity. or:.,its operation: may impair reserved tribal ights, including, but not limited to, reserved .water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights. e. All construction debris shall be properly disposed of -on land in - such a manner that it cannot enter into the waterway or cause water quality degradation (Section'.13, -Rivers"".and Harbors Act).. . • f. Skirting is prohibited around the pier unless specifically authorized by a permit. • • • 3 ' CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 24, 1996 TO: Fred Kaufman FROM: •,//frk R. Pywell,MCP SUBJECT: Mendenhall Pier Replacement LUA96-093,SM,SMV,ECF Attached is a copy of the map for the subject property. This map is drawn at a scale of 1"= 100'. A measurement of this area demonstrates that the inner harbor line is 260 feet from the edge of the shoreline. If you have any further questions regarding this project,please contact me at extension 5586. MEMO.DOT/ Washington State Northwest Region WAP Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O. Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133 9710 (206)440-4000 ��4 "' P 2 0 1996 • DATE: September 13,1996 OEy ELOPr,rzn. ciTYoFR y ANNING TO: Mark Pywell City of Renton,Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 405 MP 6.34 CS 1744 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Mendenhall Pier Repacement b. p(14,4) File No. LUA-96-093,SM,SV,ECF FROM: Robert A. Josep on,�PE, Manager of Planning&Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project which is located at 3007 Mountain View Avenue North. Our response is checked below: X We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. The Project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to anaylyse the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any would be required. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name 09/10/96 TUE 15:22 FAX 1 206 931 0752 MUCKLESHOOT FISH 0001 'MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 4.4 -� "r° �s- - 'TRIBE 6 FISHERIES DEPARTMENT �'j RIBE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON SEP 1 1999 10 September 1996 Mr. Mark R. Pywell, AICP City of Renton RECEIVED Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: MDNS ISSUED FOR MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEMENT (LUA-96- 093,SM,SMV.ECF1 Dear Mr. Pywell: The Environmental Division of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe has reviewed the MDNS issued for a proposal to replace an existing 225 foot pier with another 225 foot pier, though of slightly smaller overwater coverage. The applicant is to be commended for using wood mooring piles rather than using fingers as in the old structure. However, the application does justify the requested variance for a 225 foot long pier in an area where 80 feet is the maximum authorized length and which is extensively used by juvenile salmon. The request for variance states that proposed pier length is consistent with other piers in the neighborhood, though the pier to the immediate south of, the proposed pier is less than 100 feet long. The variance request claims that 12 feet of water depth is necessary for safe moorage, though the letter.does not state specifically why such a depth is required for safe moorage. The nearshore environment of Lake Washington in this reach of the lake (lake miles 39-40) has been largely bulkheaded, and to a considerable extent occupied by piers and associated structures. For example, in 1989 this lake reach contained approximately 32 piers. Both piers and bulkheads are considered to have adverse impacts upon the nearshore environment used by juvenile salmon. Though the applicant believes that the requested variance will cause no hardship or inconvenience to the public welfare, granting the proposed variance will perpetuate a situation that has altered the nearshore habitat of the lake that is extensively utilized by juvenile salmon, a public resource. Furthermore, the City of Renton should consider the continuation of existing impacts upon aquatic resources and declining salmon stocks when piers are replaced. When the opportunity is presented to reduce the level of impact, the opportunity should be taken. 39015 172nd Avenue S.E. •Auburn, Washington 98092 •(206) 931-0652 • FAX (206) 931-0752 09/10/96 TUE 15:23 FAX 1 206 931 0752 MUCKLESHOOT FISH 002 Alternatives to constructing a 225 foot long pier exist and should be explored, and the need for the variance thoroughly documented and based upon current requirements of the applicant. I thank you for your attention to our concerns. If you have any questions please call me at (206) 931-0652, extension 119. Sincerely, Zzloittrb92V • Roderick Malcom Habitat Biologist cc: WDFW / Corps of Engineers / Regulatory AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • Jessica Borg , being first duly sworn on oath stateF that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the ' VALLEY DAILY NEWS i 600 S. Washington Kent, WA. 98032 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENIAL a dailynewspaper six 6 times week. Said newspaper is a legal DETERMINATION 1996. Appeal procedures and the Ren- published ( ) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE tion measures imposed by the City of Ren- newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six RENTON, WASHINGTON ton's Environmental Review Committee months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the The Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Wash- (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Significance — Mitigated for the following Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: ington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order project under the authority of the Renton 235-2550. You should be prepared to of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. Municipal Code. make specific factual objections. A " The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Valley Daily News MENDENHALL S PIER Hearing will at held gby the Renton LUA-96-093, SM,SMV,ECF ing Examiner his regular meeting_ _.._ (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Environmental review, shoreline sub- Council Chambers on the second floor of stantial development permit and shoreline City Hall,Renton,Washington,on Septem- durir9g the below stated period. The annexed notice, a variance. Location: 3007 Mountain View ber 24, 1996 at 9:00 AM to consider the Ave. No. Shoreline Variance. If the ERC determina- N o t i c e of Env Pet The 15 day commentll4 day appeal tion is appealed, the appeal will be heard periods for this project will run concurrent- as part of this public hearing. ly and end at 5:00 p.m. on September 10, Published in the Valley Daily News August 26, 1996. 1999 was published on 8—2 6—9 6 The full amount of the fee charged for said.foregoing publication is the sum of $--- 44 . 92 gal Clerk, alley Daily N Subscribed and sworn before me this day f 19 . _ ,c2i .F,., ��pRGtEth ,�.,,\ssfoy �ly Notary Pu is or the State of Washington ••c° 9: residing at Auburn *c' 0 rAA to King County, Washington .0 F wA$H���� . CITY OF RENTON u. Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner.Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 12, 1996 Mr. W. M. Free Sea & Shore Construction, Inc. 1100 NW Leary Way Seattle, WA 98107 SUBJECT: Mendenhall Pier Replacement Project No. LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF Dear Mr. Free: This letter is to inform you that the comment and/or appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. As you know, your request for a Shoreline Variance is scheduled for a public hearing before the Renton Hearing Examiner on September 24, 1996 at 9:00 AM in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If you prefer to make other arrangements to receive the staff report, please contact Sandi Seeger at 277-5581. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. P j, AICP" Project Manager cc: Ms. Besse Mendenhall/Owner FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the t, :" day of SepfietrA6eX , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing titsurt E'4 tw.ar -Repo Iris documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing $tssc ►Me sAde.k, IM.lnl. Sea emd SlAohe. 0vtisrt'vlu� `wv� • ' y Qv`Boks (Signature of Sender) i .IOL it- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _)�� 'f� " - SQ e� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for tt uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 1. �c, / `/ % r(,/t Notary Public&and for t e State of Wstigton K . . i . Notary (Print)d7,41,, /� ni �R vin rh,�{{ ' `����`�. My appointment expire - 9 - 9 9 . ~fi h4 ,.. balm.f•• • Oj me . F•fir• - MtV►VgL`` fir-�r Replac.came4" OR`ojacthtumber. SM t SA►W ECG NOTARY.DOC �.y EPTE.M;:: ;>::>:::>: B.ER24 ..1.9.9.�. . o N r . ; h HAMBERS, $ COND r=r_OOR, RENTO4 MUNICIPAL BrJlr;.,irkG::>::>:::<:::»;:::::::>::»::>�<:>:<: The applic;tion(s) listed e in order of application.number onl and not necessaril ..the order in which ....... .....................................................................................::h....t�.n ...t.the.d..scret�an.o...the:>He:a:t�.n >Exa : .� r::;:;::::::::::>::::»::>::::>::::>::>::>:::: PROJECT NAME: MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEMENT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks a Substantial Shoreline Development Permit (SM), a Variance (SMV), and Environmental Review (ECF) in order to construct a six foot wide by 225 foot long pier (approx. 1350 SF). The proposed pier will replace an existing 8 foot wide by 225 foot long pier (approx. 1662 SF).. Both the existing pier and the proposed pier serve a single family residence on Lake Washington. The existing pier will be removed and new piling, framing, and decking will be installed for the new pier. This pier will be two feet above the ordinary high water mark of the lake. The construction of this project will take ten days and will occur when all applicable permits have been issued. It is anticipated that the State Department of Fish & Wildlife will establish a specific period in which the proposed construction may occur. Location: 3007 Mountain View Avenue. 0 AGNDA.DOC ik CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date September 24, 1996 Project Name Mendenhall Pier Replacement Applicant/ M.W.Free Address Sea&Shore Construction,Inc. 1100 N.W.Leary Way Seattle,WA 98107 Owner/ Besse Mendenhall Address 11448 Rainier Ave. South#108 Seattle,WA 98178-3952 File Number LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF Project Manager , Mark R.Pywell Project Description The applicant seeks a Substantial Shoreline Development Permit, a Variance, and environmental review in order to construct a six foot wide by 225 foot long pier (approx. 1350 sf). The proposed pier will replace an existing 8 foot wide by 225 foot long pier(approx. 1662 sf). Both the existing pier and the proposed pier serve a single family residence on Lake Washington. The existing pier will be removed and new piling, framing, and decking will be installed for'the new pier. This pier will be two feet above the ordinary high water mark of the lake. The construction of this project will take ten days and will occur when all applicable permits have been issued. It is anticipated that the State Department of Fish&Wildlife will establish a specific period in which the proposed construction may occur. Project Location 3007 Mountain View Ave. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record Besse Mendenhall 2. Zoning Designation Residential 8 d.u./acre 3. Comprehensive Plan Residential Single Family Land Use Designation 4. Existing Site Use Single Family Residential S.- Neighborhood Characteristics North Single Family Residential East Single Family Residential -. South Single Family Residential West Lake Washington 6. Access Mountain View Ave.North 7. Site Area 16,700 sf City of Renton PB/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Mendenhal Pier Replacement LUA-96-093,SM,SMV PUBLIC HEARING DATE:September,24, 1996 Page 2 of 5 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area(Pier Area) 1662 sf Existing Building to be Demolished 1662 sf New Building Area(Pier Area) 1350 sf Total Building Area 1350 sf C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 1804 12/8/59 Comprehensive Plan 4498 2/20/95 Zoning 4404 6/7/93 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities No utilities are required at the pier. 2. Fire Protection Renton Fire Department 3. Transit No public transit available at this site. 4. Schools N/A S. Recreation N/A 6. Other N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1 Section 4-31-5;Residential-8 D.U./Acre(R-8) 2. Shoreline Master Program F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. 1 Residential Single Family 2. Environmental Element/Surface Water PRELMRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department _ Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Mendenhal Pier Replacement LUA-96-093,SM,SMV PUBLIC HEARING DATE:September, 24, 1996 Page 3 of 5 G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and a Variance from the Shoreline Master Program in order to remove an existing eight-foot wide by 225-foot,long private pier and construct a six-foot wide by 225-long private pier. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be issued separately once the Hearing Examiner has issued a determination on the variance. As noted above, there is an existing pier on the subject property. This pier extends out to an area where the water is 12 feet in depth. This allows for sailboats and the larger motorboats to be moored at the pier without the fear of scraping the lake bottom during the drier months. The depth also limits the disturbance of the lake bottom each time a boat is brought into or leaves the pier. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)"issued a Determination of Non- Significance -Mitigated on August 20, 1996. 3 COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES The applicant shall ensure that all construction debris and litter is properly disposed of away from the shoreline area. In order to further protect the water, all equipment shall be fueled away from the shoreline area. The applicant will need to comply with this mitigation measure during the construction phase of the project. During the removal of the existing pilings and the installation of the new pilings the applicant shall ensure that a visual as well as physical measurement of turbidity and dissolved oxygen is maintained to assure that water quality is not adversely impacted beyond the anticipated minor and short-term periods. The applicant will need to comply with this mitigation measure during the construction phase of the project. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and in the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. PRELMRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department _ Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Mendenhal Pier Replacement LUA-96-093,SM,SMV PUBLIC HEARING DATE:September, 24,,1996 Page 4 of 5 5. CONSISTENCY WITH VARIANCE CRITERIA Upon proper application, a substantial development permit may be granted which is at variance with the criteria established in the Renton Master Program where, owing to special conditions pertaining to the specific piece of property, the literal interpretation and strict application of the criteria established in the Renton Master Program would cause undue an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulties. The fact that the applicant might make a greater profit by using his property in a manner contrary to the intent of the Master Program is not, by itself, sufficient reason for a variance. The Land Use Hearing Examiner must find each of the following: a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property, or to the intended use thereof, that do not apply, generally to other properties on the shoreline in the same vicinity. The applicant believes that extrodinary conditions apply to this property. It is located in an area of shallow water. An eighty foot long pier from the high water mark of the lake would only reach a water depth of four feet during the high water period of the lake. During the low water period of the lake the water depth would even be less. A small beach usually forms along this section of the lake during the drier months. b. The variance permit is necessary is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. Other private piers along the lake frontage reach water depths of 12 feet within the prescribed limit of 80 feet. The depth of 12 feet is necessary for those who desire to moor boats larger than the typical runabout at their pier. c. The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shorelines in the same vicinity. The variance will not be materially detrimental to the public. The adjacent pier is also extended to the same area in order to provide an adequate water depth at the end of the pier. d. The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program. The variance, if granted, will be in harmony with the intent of the Master program. Although the length of the pier is longer than would normally be allowed, it is necessary in order to reach beyond the very shallow water area that extends out more than 80 feet from the upland section of the applicants property. PRELMRPT.DOC . City of Renton PB/PW Department _ Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner Mendenhal Pier Replacement LUA-96-093,SM,SMV PUBLIC HEARING DATE:September, 24, 1996 Page 5 of 5 e. The public welfare and interest will be preserved; if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the 'applicant by denying it, the variance will be denied, but each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the provisions of this Master'Program. The granting of the variance will not cause harm to the general area. It will allow the applicant to continue to use his property in a manner similar to his neighbors that do not have this extended shallow water area as part of the lake frontage. H. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommend approval of the Mendenhall Pier Replacement Variance(LUA-96-093, SM,SMV) subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee's August 20 1996 Threshold Determination. TIME LIMIT: Variances shall be deemed to be approved within thirty(30) calendar days from the date of receipt by the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office unless written communication is received by the applicant and the City indicating otherwise. PRELMRPT.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF APPLICANT: Sea,& Shore Construction PROJECT NAME: Mendenhall Pier Replacement DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North LEAD AGENCY: . City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently: The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on September 10, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September 24, 1996 at 9:00 AM to consider the Shoreline Variance. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. 26 PUBLICATION DATE: August00, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: August 20,1996 SIGNATURES: r 6;Z i erm , Administrator DATE Departnbe of Pfannin /Buildin /Public Works 9 9 ../9 • ' 2-e'/ . Sam Chast ' , Administr tor DAT Community Service Department e- 02o , 1 ' , Z Lee eler, ire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF APPLICANT: Sea & Shore Construction PROJECT NAME: Mendenhall Pier Replacement DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall ensure that all construction debris and litter is properly disposed of away from the shoreline area. In order to further protect the water, all equipment shall be fueled away from the shoreline area. 2. During the removal of the existing pilings and the installation of the new pilings the applicant shall ensure that a visual as well as physical measurement of turbidity and dissolved oxygen is maintained to assure that water quality is not adversely impacted beyond the anticipated minor and short-term periods. MITMEAS.DOC1 • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF , APPLICANT: Sea & Shore Construction PROJECT NAME: Mendenhall Pier Replacement DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional regulations,codes and policies governing the project and obtain all necessary permits. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Regulations including,but no limited to,the City's Noise Ordinance restricting noise levels and hours of operation. 3. An architect will need to conduct structural observation on the pile driving. The connections are deemed to'be structural. After completion of the pier the architect will write a letter to the building official certifying that the constructions meets the approved plans. The architect will conduct a final inspection with the City building inspector. 4. Untreated piling are to be used, unless treatment is approved by the building official. ADVNOTES.DOC\ • • CC41AWAIM ZejA4 1ceS APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-093, SM, SMV, ECF Applicant: Sea & Shore Construction (M.W. Free) Project Title: Mendenhall Pier A: Environment impact: No comment. B: Architect to conduct structural observation on pile driving; connections deemed structural, through coordination with the contractor; write letter to building official certifying that construction meets the approved plan; conduct a final inspection with the building inspector. C.: Untreated piling, unless treatment is approved by the building official. H:dev.svcs\dev&cpl an.ing''96-093 I 4c6CEDAR - VICINITY . - PROJECT INFO. DECKING,FASTEN • / 4KB DE 12,FASTEN PT t OWNER: W/(3)20d BOX �'''�' � GALV,NAILS 4 W/3/B'2.. R 12" COB-SITE: BE55E MENDENHALL ---I BOAT SPIKE 90D7 MOUNTAIN NEW . N . _�_�y LOCATIONS EA.BD. fi srtE noDKEss: - . 'mod(, O.uOaNeox RENTON,WA. ''," t.�tu.i�:•.•.v:.. UNION.M,W1Aw MVAv.N 6�_O" ,..:... 3007 MOUNTAW NEW AVE.N 'k- -- � SENTON.WA Dw",•rf .., / / qy _�.t.=_i- _=:Lro-'�1. - / v _ - Zofi,.g 1` f.: ' ':.';.k_.: • ARCNnECT: 7/16/96 CASs W 1ZallsirW..019 1-+�--s-:,µmea. _.- s.M.sTEMreRnKCHNEcrs y 7"' �-=a�'E--a:a".a:__ 217 RNE 5T.SUITE 700 ♦I LAMING LOLL sum., .yam+: ^'�:_- _. _1. • 10..GL w5iII 0e H _ �? g J. SEATTLE.WA MICA .P(L I CG/GKAIG. .. Pam.._... to 4'IS" .-:i �: ,41,1 riiikidie :- . \ T-.._._a,.__::._...>:..a:1%•• BONING: pi 30.0' 10:05ED MOORNO �I - ,I•..�.:;. :.�._'L�-,•..� RESIDENTIAL dwL10' 3007.100WEw,A.I I /.1 ry 5�-';�_:s;fFj7� __-•_tc:�ia1J'v: lIITIYL Lk 4e'vlxlt. 3Do uOMrtAw,HW A..• I 15.13' Ill�k., "y �j' -:s=-Fi r<:�:'i:t.,�Y TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: uE1Exa:RnlEurERe u'^O1�"'` ( N. _ r norostonEX 1 " ( h r : v=.-P: r--..vys« ;,,L1� arSES 10 BE w1G'fD 2KB CEDARI1: I1 �{� !�, � 334210.3930-0 �••��`-'-::a:ptl ,I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ____"- -'-"'---"--' II ' .., $ . .,s�_ '.•'_..7.• ',. REMOVE EXISTING DETERIORATED RER AND ? FASCIAW/ Y �'r. i' naS, - E":SI PILES( MOXIATELY1662.ft.)CONSTRUCT NEW �..�— .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ _._.._.. 1/2'RADIUS _ _ m f .. AND TWO bI ROUNDED '� .JJ ��('i='tl'^�1bi_ L , _ FIER(1350q.1L.)AND DRIVE TWO NEW 4 225`P ncrR CORNERS I I 1 I 'i 1 say+._j 0 ' W L. 7 -\ i.•' ••C1 MOORAGE FILES AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS DaMrR 1 4. :.` (. �- L. I I. \ DATED7O6I90. a•L�•.U1 1� I�E LEGAL DESCRIPTION _�... "rl"1 rEe 6R6 DF 42,FASTEN W/ 12'CIA.NATURAL •.y.� >:•,., •'7f-��`Z' i-g1i6... I t ••• ,L LLDSCRIOT BLOCKA FIAT:MILlMANS CARE • ,I, yJ+1/ WASH.GARDEN OF EDEN NO.01 WOODPILES BENTS r•',,�''''',.`1'^ 'AFJ II '• I tl HILLMANS LR Val GARDEN OF WEN RI 62N0 DRIFDIA.K24'SPIRAL !+':1 sX��•!!!!!!L• I tl/I( CL SH LDS DRIFT PIN SPA':ED 912'TYPICAL � ,�;,,,T-`} ,-'s-, P.1. r U J Z PLOT PLAN , - ' if\ SECTION A 2 SCALE 1"=50' © SCALE 1/2"=1'-0' Z OL l e Z Z .o a:g ! 'L111<., uJ:1,ySUJ79�J'J f J)�J cc 1° < P/L ww 6 EXISTING ROCK BULKHEAD. ).1.) 03 . (NO CHANGE IN SIZE OR Y • tel Z CONFIGURATION) • • m a,. BESSE MENDENHALL ry 30•_0• ,� TWO NEW NATURAL WOOD OHW 21.8'-- 5 13007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE.N. ! MOORING PILES DRIVEN '•Z••'ON,17f`• I ! I __ _�ti�TO REFUSAL 1_ IIIIII������I OUTLINE OF EXISTING 12'NATURAL WOOD PILES DRIVEN ' DETERIORATED PIER AND TO REFUSAL(38 PILES TOTAL) L I PILES TO BE REMOVED. -LGPE (APPROX 16625q.ft.) 4K6 DFL I>_STRINGER(TYP.) PROPOSED PIER 5 I REMOVE 2 E%IST. I I aD %I A, L - -- ' TI!'. !---.- ---6K8 DFI 42 CAP TYP. ( �-EXISTING RAMP.NO NI MOORING PILES I - I f ( ) / 1350Bo ft.) ' ! / CONFIGURATION OR ' CHANGE IN TSIZEION ) _._ L 1 ED. 1 L TRY 1;"l'*Wm i�491 ry -.o'Af I,d Il.�,-. - ._ ._ ._ _.- ':- - - _ o_f Sul I u Jt F.K t m � A :226_0 •: . � �H/ 1 VI= G 1 ^o .4.I I-n PIER PLAN "' ' SCALE 1/16"c 1'-0" , y•0. 8 12 16 20 - , 14 2 W 10 Z EXISTING ROCK °' ♦_. _._.__—.._-—_ - .. .__—___. .__-_ _._ 225'-0' . —_.—__. ... .__ _ y BULKHEAD.(NO CHANGE IN SIZE OR ~ b I 12'NATURAL WOOD PILES - 12' PROPOSED PIER CONFIRGURATION) fi fi iv • DRIVEN TO REFUSAL TIP. (1350Bgft.) OHW 21.8' •y, - — 1I, 9 tl APPROXIMATE LOCA TION ~ THE LAK EBE a O 1 ELEVATION/SITE SECTION - 1 OF 1 SCALE 1/16"=1'-0" 0 8 12 16 20 - '?.:.CITY:° } F.R N::>. ............................... .:.......r.r.r.........:...........:......... ..:.::..�::::::...::::::::::...::.:::..:?:.:.:..OM::::.::.>'::.,:r:::::::::...r......r............ .?.:.;:..:::..:,<.,ri:.}:::::::::i;::;:::.::,:-..}:.;>:?. PLANNINGv i u:R. ..Cl=>:B: Al N:.................. ............ . ............................ ............. I. A. !"i".. ...... ill. . .. .1�<:Nl..... BEotgnasoimomomNowa .n....r:n........ ..............F.rr.:.r.....n:......nr...........x....r........n...........................m::::• :...................................................n.....n?v:�.:v:.v:•..:.:::::•:i},/,•::?:it:ii:}}:::•}::vi:}i:??i:.:riv:.v. On the 2 day of Ale , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Kn. .. - la er Itualav% epit l , �IY1e �o lurrib 'Deft df Aislnevtem 1" .e..,id la%iriannaan vicipt of uatat RcsQt. lcem • A* d.e v, 1 ft Af —T'vo.AsPortatw, Swe. -1Zwrsne of sea-t. L uw ts', Ivsdtan '±2ack tmakow► nshevves Innucic-lesL ' tatA t de(Signature of Sender) Jn 0)0._ 5c iu . �-e4e STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ,/ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 547vitx4 /\ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: • \\ ' ` Notary P is in a or the State of Washin o Notary(Print) !r) CT.V Y d�f(-' � My appointment expires: 0/ /q '` . • Project Name: hne.,Ade AereAt Ptw kuemelit • Project Number. 94, _04 3‘5 M A SV vel NOTARY.00C •„y= CFI OF RENTON . _ , ;, Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor . Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • August 21, 1996 , • Washington State - • Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section , PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 , Subject: Environmental Determinations . Transmitted herewith is a copy of the.Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on August 20, 1996: - Mitigation Measures which are enclosed. : DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED . • MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEMENT M LUA-96-093,S ,SV,ECF "' i , . The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use. Location: 3007 Mountain View Avenue'North. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will,run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on September 10, 1996. .Following the;end of the comment and appeal period,the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services " Division,•Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September 24, 1996 at 9:00 AM to consider the Shoreline Variance. If the Environmental - Determination is appealed,the,appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing If you have questions, please call me at (206)277-5586.: . ` : ' - -. For the Environmental Review Committee,; 17 - . .• ,. . .. Mark R. Pyw CP " Project Manager • .• • cc King County Water Pollution'Control,Division, Metro - , Department of Wildlife -• - . - - • : - Larry,Fisher, Department of Fisheries " David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources • " ; : - Don Hurter, Department of Transportation ' • . Sue Rumery,"City"of Seattle* : .- • •:Duwamish Tribal Office '. - - Rod Malcom,"Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) - • .• ' • :. ' • • ; :• Rita Perstac, Puget Power • AGNCYLTR.DOC\- ' 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 �►r�._ ._.•__eno,___.._,_a__._._, new___.____...__: di CI7: .1 OF RENTON • — ;. Planning/Building/Public Works Department • Jesse Tanner,Mayor - Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 21, 1996 Mr. M. W. Free Sea &Shore Construction, Inc. 1100 N.W. Leary Way Seattle, WA 98107.. • SUBJECT: Mendenhall Pier Replacement Project No. LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF • Dear Mr. Free: '• This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the .above referenced project:. The Committee, on August 20, 1996, decided that your project.may be issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance,there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the.comment period. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on September_10, 1996. .Following the end of the pp comment/aeal period, the City will.finalize its Determination,•-unless comments received require a reevaluation: _ WAC 197-11-660.states that the 'responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action.. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. ° : Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate,-(e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning,specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. _This information will-assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more.fully, if you choose to_do`so. • Appeal procedures and mitigation measures":imposed by the City-of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development-Services Division, Third Floor, MunicipalBuilding, Renton, Washingtorp• 98055: Phone: 235-2550..-You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. • A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council-Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton;Washington, on September;24,_1996 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit. .If the Environmental Determination is:appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. :The applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. if you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (206) 277-5586. • For the Environmental Review Committee, ' ,• - Mark R. Pywe P , • Project Man r cc: :Ms. Besse Mendenhall, Ms. Peggy DuBois ,, , DNSMLTR.DOC ' 200 Mill Avenue.South -'Renton,-Washington 98055 tfRil This paper contains 50%recycled material,25%post consumer -- -CITY OF RENTON •• DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • MITIGATION MEASURES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF APPLICANT: Sea & Shore Construction • • PROJECT NAME: Mendenhall Pier Replacement pi - • - DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The'applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for • private use. . . . „ LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: - 3007 Mountain View Avenue North , . . . MITIGATION MEASURES: . • _ ' ' _ . 1. The applicant shall ensure that all construction debris and litter is properly disposed of away from the shoreline area. In order to further'protect the water, all equipment shall be fueled away from the shoreline area. - - • . . • 2. ; During the removal of the existing pilings and the installation of the new.pilings the applicant shall • - ensure that a visual as well as physical measurement of turbidity and dissolved oxygen is maintained to. '• assure that water quality is not adversely impacted beyond the anticipated minor and skaOrt-term periods. . • . - • . • , • , , • • , • • • , • . , • • • • • MITMEAS.DOC\ • • . . CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES • • APPLICATION NO(S): . LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF • APPLICANT: Sea & Shore Construction PROJECT.NAME: Mendenhall Pier Replacement • , . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225,foot lone pier for • private,use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North • - • The following notes are supplemental information.provided in conjunction with.the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for'environmental determinations .• 1 • The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional ' regulations, codes and policies governing the project and obtain all necessary permiti. • ` , : 2.- The applicant shall comply'with all applicable City Regulations including,but no limited to,the City's • • -Noise Ordmance restricting noise levels and hours of operation. 3. An architect will need to conduct,struCtural observation on the pile driving. The connections are deemed to be structural. After completion of the pier the architect will.write a letter to the building official certifying that the constructions meets the approved plans. *The architect will conduct a final -inspection with the City building inspect Or. • • 4. Untreated piling are to be used,unless treatment is approved by the building official. • , . .• , • - .,• , , .. • _ . , • •' • . . - • , . • . •• - • . • . - • . •- - . • . , • - • , , - •ADVNOTES.DOC\ • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF APPLICANT: Sea &Shore Construction PROJECT NAME: Mendenhall Pier Replacement DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works , Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on September 10, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September 24, 1996 at 9:00 AM to consider the Shoreline Variance. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. PUBLICATION DATE: August�9, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: August 20, 1996 SIGNATURES: r gig ""i eri‘/M0e1/ /1"-\dministrator DATE De artnbe ofin /Buildin /Public Works p 9 9 9 - Sam Chast ' , Administr tor DAT Community Service Department 02e2 ' Lee eler, ire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF APPLICANT: Sea & Shore Construction PROJECT NAME: Mendenhall Pier Replacement DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall ensure that all construction debris and litter is properly disposed of away from the shoreline area. -In orderto further protect the water, all equipment shall be fueled away from the shoreline area. 2. During the removal of the existing pilings and the installation of the new pilings the applicant shall ensure that a visual as well as physical measurement of turbidity and dissolved oxygen is maintained to assure that water quality is not adversely impacted beyond the anticipated minor and short-term periods. i MITMEAS.DOC1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) I ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF APPLICANT: Sea &Shore Construction PROJECT NAME: Mendenhall Pier Replacement DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and obtain all necessary permits. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Regulations including,but no limited to,the City's Noise Ordinance restricting noise levels and hours of operation. 3. An architect will need to conduct structural observation on the pile driving. ' The connections are deemed to be structural. After completion of the pier the architect will write a letter to the building official certifying that the constructions meets the approved plans. The architect will conduct a final inspection with the City building inspector. 4. Untreated piling are to be used,unless treatment is approved by the building official. ADVNOTES.DOC\ ' NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. MENDENHALL PIER LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF Environmental review, shoreline substantial development permit and shoreline variance. Location: 3007 Mountain View Ave. No. The 15 day comment/14 day appeal periods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on September 10, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September 24, 1996 at 9:00 AM to consider the Shoreline Variance. If the ERC determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. 2(o Publication Date:. August Mk 1996 Account No. 51067 . dnsmpub.dot - i . . , . . . 1 ii . . NOP- - -CE . . . . ' ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION , PROJECT NAME: MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEMENT • . PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99.093,SM,SMV,ECF The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval In order to • replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use.Location:3007 Mountain View Avenue North. { THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERC) HAS DETERMINED • , THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. n APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING , EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM,_ i ® YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 10,1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,SEPTEMBER 10. 1996. THE COMMENT AND • APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. • A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING'EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL,RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 24, 1998 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SHORELINE VARIANCE. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED,THE APPEAL WILL BE • HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. - ' • roar $nc - J( s° O�' _s,.:ffsw, , --11 � �- • • ''.e- • ',It"7.1 V•M'.......,_.I L 1":11'';19 i • •-• 41.0,,,, \\l...p.. ,...— 12 7 1 J rl[:Irv¢ • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CI I Y ut•RENTON,DEVELOPMENT ' - SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION .Please Include the,project NUMBER when calling for proper ,P. 1 9 P P a.'..'' CE 'RTI-FICATION• I, /ag'k. 1,✓,14ve-I/r _, hereby certify that 13 copies of the above document were posted by rr4e in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Signed���� ��';� l • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) 0 certify that 1 know or, have satisfactory evidence that Mil-kg_ PY� .LL•• - signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary 1 t; tyk e e uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 4 , f= Dated: �a qq /� ' 04r W: 1,��� . ,.a �� otary Pik k•is in a ii:'or the Stale 6f Was`hjn tbn�,r • Notary (Print) e¢/ t6 ETr GC L[- My appointment expires: 6 Ni‘T.' NOTARY,OOC • • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEMENT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF ' The applicant seeks a.Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to • replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use. Location: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED ' THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED.. , APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 10. 1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, SEPTEMBER 10. 1996. THE COMMENT AND . APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 24, 1996 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SHORELINE VARIANCE. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. • _ -.! - -0..,1,0 12 - IARF SITE, — • ?- 7 .'e✓••.. fk, ,•• / y� "' S.F. 'I T 9L. .... • R S.E. 92ND 5. IN ____IL,,. :02:1FF:..11 1, it •...;;?•,(.. .--:.----rfr . . , .."7„.. • .... , :.7. . y'..�. n•Fq rat F >: 1 G) .1., n• • �• S-1, � i 1�„ ate, h \ SE.^9J99 SF .J g `/Ire —. - ' ,.-,t, 0 itr.-A,--i, ,„,• - .--- 0-.''ig.Tilim' ' • ,' 1 • S.E. 9459 •I •�.•^ 1‘ r i I aq•� ...d 1;=i.l;l jar i ''• 'a-- 1, \ 9 .l i"�.I:�'..LI..l t• ,� u S.E. 95TH Si. '-;,,t)r ANZ:k>,,,-,, 1\ ' lett:.0-..1, FOR FURTHER-INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CI I Y cm- i ENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION .. 'li .ae..inclade fiV:pr..oect;:NUMBERwhen:>callin :<.for.> ro ersfile:identfica io >.> €<:>:<:j>:<>;>:: 1 ' STAFF City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE August 20, 1996 Project Name Mendenhall Pier Replacement Applicant Sea&Shore Construction File Number LUA-096-093, Project Manager MarkR. Pywell, SM,SMV,ECF • AICP Project Description The applicant seeks a Substantial Shoreline Development Permit, a Variance, and environmental review in order to construct a six foot wide by 225 foot long pier , (approx. 1350 sf). The proposed pier will replace an existing 8 foot wide by 225 foot long pier(approx. 1662 sf). Both the existing pier and the proposed pier serve a single family residence on Lake Washington. The existing pier will be removed and new piling, framing, and decking will be installed for the new pier. This pier will be two feet above the ordinary high water mark of the lake. The construction of this project will take ten,days and will occur when all applicable permits have been issued. It is anticipated that the State Department of Fish&Wildlife will establish a specific period in which the proposed construction may occur. Project Location 3007 Mountain View Ave. Exist. Bldg.,Area gsf 1662 sf Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 1350 sf Site Area 16,700 sf Total Building Area gsf 1350 sf RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a D_eter_mination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. ^RF '� =rT93.34210/ �e'•�' r s.E. r rc •ru—• .. .,. Viff g:- _ - .v $, S.E. 92ND•' TM. f. — is . �� ° • ,g ✓ham ���• �'� I<r/ • • , - r ° • '5 E. 9390 ST .1 IMF/i. •I� ' `°� i g �__•"—▪i' ' 11C2 'rus S.E. 94TN SST. • ' • to ��• ��'rl ' Project Location Map : . S.E. 95TN sr. �jRpf DOC < :•°)` fir` rl City of Renton PB/PW Department 'ronmental Review Committee Staff Report MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEM::... LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OP'AUGUST 20,1996 Page 2 of 4 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A,•eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall ensure that all construction debris and litter is properly disposed of away from the shoreline area. In order to further protect the water, all equipment shall be fueled away from the shoreline area. 2. During the removal of the existing pilings and the installation of the new pilings the applicant shall ensure that a • visual as well as physical measurement of turbidity and dissolved oxygen is maintained to assure that water quality is not adversely impacted beyond the anticipated minor and short-term periods. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City, state, county, federal and other jurisdictional regulations, codes and policies governing the project and obtain all necessary permits. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable City Regulations including, but no limited to,the City's Noise Ordinance restricting noise levels and hours of operation. 3. An architect will need to conduct structural observation on the pile driving. The connections are deemed to be structural. After completion of the pier the architect will write a letter to the building official certifying that the constructions meets the approved plans. The architect will conduct a final inspection with the City building inspector. 4. Untreated piling are to be used, unless treatment is approved by the building official. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department ronmental Review Committee Staff Report MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEMGtvi LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 20,1996 Page 3 of 4 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur • in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: The applicant will be removing an existing pier,with approximately 48 piles, and two mooring piles. Then the applicant will be installing 38 piles for the new pier and two new piles. The removal of the 50 existing piles and the installation of forty new piles has the potential to cause a significant amount of disturbance of the bottom sediment. This turbidity in the water could affect the spawning of fish species that breed in the shallow water areas of the lake. The sediment could also adversely impact the plant life that fish depend on in this area. State Fisheries staff establish windows during which construction activities can occur in Lake Washington. The permits allowing construction limit construction activities to those months in which the Lake is at its' lowest levels. This limits the amount of work that needs to be conducted under the water and also limits the area disturbed by the sediment as it settles back onto the lake bottom. The applicant will still need to have the construction work monitored to ensure that the turbidity caused by the construction does not become excessive. Mitigation Measures: During the removal of the existing pilings and the installation of the new pilings the applicant shall ensure that a visual as well as physical measurement of turbidity and dissolved oxygen is maintained to assure that water quality is not adversely impacted beyond the anticipated minor and short-term periods. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) Section 4-6, Shoreline Master Program 2. Noise Impacts: Demolition and construction activities, especially the pile driver, could result in noise impacts during the length of time in which the construction will occur. The applicant has stated that the proposed construction will take ten days. As the construction will occur for only a limited duration, it is not considered to be a significant adverse impact. The applicant will need to comply with the City's Code-requirements. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation measures are required. Nexus: N/A 3. Water Impacts: The applicant is proposing to use untreated pilings. The chemicals used to treat pilings, if used, can leach out into the lake. If the applicant desires to use a treated piling, the type of treatment used will need to be approved by the Building Official. Construction activities can cause adverse impact if debris and litter is allowed to enter Lake Washington. The applicant will need to ensure that debris and litter is not allowed to enter into the lake. Therefore,the applicant will need to ensure that all litter and debris are properly contained within the work area and that adequate storage facilities are maintained away from the shoreline. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall ensure that all construction debris and litter is properly disposed of away from the shoreline area. In order to further protect the water, all equipment shall be fueled away from the shoreline area. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Section 4-6. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment 'ronniental Review Committee Staff Report MENDENHALL PIER REPLACEMitv=i LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF AUGUST 20,1996 Page 4 of 4 E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. _X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.. • • ERCRPT.DOC *t ' Renton Department of Planning/Building I, . �r'ic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION .REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Ch-tvu t S�.rutces COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13;® 901 P RENT©n1 . APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 29, 1996 OF � APPLICANT: SEA&SHORE CONSTRUCTION (M.W. FREE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELJIL CI 1996 PROJECT TITLE: MENDENHALL PIER WORK ORDER NO: 78119 �UIL®11�G �IVI�i LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North C �� SITE AREA: 16,700 Sq. Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,350 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT SEEKS A SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT(SM)AND VARIANCE(SMV)TO REPLACE AN EXISTING PIER WITH A 225 FT. LONG PIER FOR PRIVATE USE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment' Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS t. ARafirai l LYJ(oD U(Ji 5 iaLLJt o P. .i misit!JIIi 11 V tIa P IL tRUtha 1 tittJainik. I' '' D S�>�udiati, itiR �fi �aArl1b� Wl(11 ft LbF (4L'fDb ' U)R.IT Lefts. t BD[ , bcPfG & L fFUIIUG'' i�r C� 5CRnf�[o� Mef5 TG R PPIOU 1 L.D 1) PELT p A) !IgkaIDD C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS II ,\ P11,110Cbutffi ik.t41.0U1- 16 & ail) q it hOttl DPFICIAt. We v e i d this afion with.particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh r i 1 fi�4 ' ded to pr petty assess this proposal. ..-56 y6 Sig e o ector o' et zed Representative Date DEV PP.DOC Rev.10/93 3 • APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-093, SM, SMV, ECF Applicant: Sea & Shore Construction (M.W. Free) Project Title: Mendenhall Pier A: Environment impact: No comment. B: Architect to conduct structural observation on pile driving; connections deemed structural, through coordination with the contractor; write letter to building official certifying that construction meets the approved plan; conduct a final inspection with the building inspector. C.: Untreated piling, unless treatment is approved by the building official. H:dev.sves\dev&plan.ing196-093 City;;,`Renton Department of Planning/Building, , �;lic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -IIGG COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 1996 • APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 29, 1996 • APPLICANT: SEA&SHORE CONSTRUCTION (M.W. FREE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: MENDENHALL PIER WORK ORDER NO: 78119 LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North SITE AREA: 16,700 Sq. Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,350 Sq.Ft. _ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT SEEKS A SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT(SM)AND VARIANCE(SMV)TO REPLACE AN EXISTING PIER WITH A 225 FT. LONG PIER FOR PRIVATE USE. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation - Animals reline Use Utilitiesran Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet CirkD uApa ( - 2 PO&Ce UtCOai . , B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ' C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.' 16 Signature of irector or uthori ed Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 Cit,-_:Renton Department of Planning/Building r :colic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:SWIi (v,1p - wtie;�-COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV, CF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 29, 1996 CITE/nF rFENTON W A'`g'V APPLICANT: SEA&SHORE CONSTRUCTION (M.W. FREE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PY ELL O PROJECT TITLE: MENDENHALL PIER WORK ORDER NO: 78119 JUL 3 6 .1996 LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North Un�e.rervt lJlvbi O SITE AREA: 16,700 Sq. Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,350 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT SEEKS A SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT(SM)AND VARIANCE(SMV)TO REPLACE AN EXISTING PIER WITH A 225 FT. LONG PIER FOR PRIVATE USE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS . Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts .Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water • Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation • Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural • Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS , • • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • IVA • We have reviewed this application,with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. �Veil.1 . e/2/qc Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City __ Renton Department of Planning/Building; ,•;;lic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMEN17-r_pit.jmpeArkeeVrin COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 29, 1996 `''ITV OF RENTON APPLICANT: SEA&SHORE CONSTRUCTION (M.W. FREE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: MENDENHALL.PIER WORK ORDER NO: 78119 JUL r~ 0 1996 LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North pg SITE AREA: 16,700 Sq. Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): -1,350 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT SEEKS A SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT(SM)AND VARIANCE(SMV)TO REPLACE AN EXISTING PIER WITH A 225 FT. LONG PIER FOR PRIVATE USE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land%Shoreline Use Utilities Animals • Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 00 psKblic- Work) pelew!it, Dl -f-Zd ?e1toft1 fc tky prof ' . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,vei p1/4/gb Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 Cu,.t - Renton Department of Planning/Building i r-uac Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Y1tjh_kc Jte U.-W OMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 1996 • APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 29, 199�rrY OF Fon®t9 APPLICANT: SEA&SHORE CONSTRUCTION (M.W. FREE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELIppeEIVED PROJECT TITLE: MENDENHALL PIER WORK ORDER NO: 78119 r Ls2 6 i 1096 LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North SITE AREA: 16,700 Sq. Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,35E ING Oh; SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT SEEKS A SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT(SM)AND VARIANCE (SMV)TO REPLACE AN EXISTING PIER WITH A 225 FT. LONG PIER FOR PRIVATE USE: A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water - Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. AMR/ `446 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 ' City:;:Renton Department of Planning/Building i r-ublic WorksEUI)-ON F DEPT. ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION f F k,ENWASITIELET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 13, 1,§§ 0 6 . 1W0 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 29, 1991 � r'� et APPLICANT: SEA&SHORE CONSTRUCTION (M.W. FREE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWE PROJECT TITLE: MENDENHALL PIER WORK ORDER.NO: 78119 LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North SITE AREA: 16,700 Sq. Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,350 Sq.Ft. , SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT SEEKS A SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT(SM)AND VARIANCE(SMV)TO REPLACE AN EXISTING PIER WITH A 225 FT. LONG PIER FOR PRIVATE USE. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More . Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air ' - Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants - Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation ' Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ • Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet A� y�� ,c 14,000 Feet / /Up /�Ia%ar m 4 jc/S /00 f,LN B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS - p 'r. /VA - C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ' kiX • 1 . We have reviewed this application wit particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition- information is n--.:/• to properly assess this proposal. 4,,..4, ill ,--- 0//7 . ' Signatu 'irector or Authorize• Repr--entative Date DEVAPP.••• Rev.10/93 • fy� Citycii Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p. ,r COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST'13, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 29, 1996 APPLICANT: SEA&SHORE CONSTRUCTION (M.W. FREE) PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: MENDENHALL PIER • WORK ORDER NO: 78119 LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North SITE AREA: 16,700 Sq. Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,350 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: THE APPLICANT SEEKS A SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT(SM)AND VARIANCE(SMV)TO REPLACE AN EXISTING PIER WITH A 225 FT. LONG PIER FOR PRIVATE USE. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth. --- Housing • Air --- Aesthetics Water --- Light/Glare Plants --- Recreation Land/Shoreline Use -- Utilities Animals --- Transportation Environmental Health • Public Services Natural --_ Historic./Cultural sePreservation Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment /� 10,000 Feet • jheAk- / zD /�/G//14,Q00 Feet 0:16 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 177 ;0C C/1 710 • • u• • I,1 ,y, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS G� lL t�GY�I l� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wherew�re additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. s i4r( Cod—) y60, Signature i e o Authorized-Representative DEVAPP.D Rev.10/93 • —}; NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION .' RENTON, WASHINGTON - A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM), Shoreline Variance (SMV) and Environmental'Ch_ec_kiist Review ECF Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City '� '(ECF) pp p p ..•,!:�enton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. - • • . PRoJECT M tiNAE/NUMBER: " MENDENHALL PIER/LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF :;1 DESCRIPTION: '- . . 't• ` . The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance,._ approval'in.order.to;replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use. • m:=_, --"GENERAL LOCATION: . 3007 Mountain View Avenue North PUBLIC APPROVALS:.• . Environmental Review(ECF) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM) Shoreline Variance (SMV) . The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to.be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please••contact'the. Development Services_ Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file.identification.: " - :. :.."'I., ,",.- ,: ..' 7 •=-7-1-4—":: . ,,. ..,.. 7 _AAVa iliTa., , . .• No . , IARF - SITE, _— ,r• :•" , :(�'eaazro .—�T + .0 S.F. •1 T ,re_ •ia— . . ! Ann ‘.. MEI a ...611'.: . [t-r A ., • g -S.E. .92N0 T.. . • 1 - • '..,..6'it ' 6 ' ..-72.`<. • ' .... r •''jaffir4 .•. J.,: ; i -'7....--' r ._.. 4- . • — f . — „ • . _.___,_:,---.7. :...,,,,x, .1 : i. :,....,_:_s4 • i ..T r . r S.E 93RD ST ,,., y ..1 (Y I , oS a °.J e - o �� .w FI© .-.Jr-'L� .s. I- r. -i- .e .MI i I . ......;..•14.:........r......_.1;,......1 :Mialitii ' li. "7\--7',:ito...., , :1 4 i e,........t.„7_,.....cell ;Thi t.1..r a. a ' - ;- ..••• }•s; .1�•;A. f* V�-.,j1 .1 .,I :`i-i.t1-1- . .. ,c...,, . .. , . , • . - / . ). a. S.E. 95TH ST. �� - . �� t �, GENMALOT.DOC '+ i • ���., \" - ,..a • j 11 f•-• r 11 111 11111 MUM 11 a 11 11 :ti! 4110 • eff!"..Palg. L.V14.11 ••••••=am.. 11 CITY OF RENTON ;J Devclopment Services Division r 1 200 Mill Avenue South JUL 3 0'9 6 I ocfw — 3 2 Renton,Washington 98055 W A PB METER 7154076 U.S. TAGE 334210-0385-0 PAULINE M TOMICH 3010 LK WASH BLVD N RENTON,WA 98055 _ v i 9mi RFTURN I \ L4 d • .`:::i:::i::i%i:}yi::::it;i:?;i:ji?ii:::i:::}ij:i::'ii:::::{yti?::;>.::5 v'rYi:::::i'vi;:2i:`;:i::i::::i::::ii::::i::::i::i:.:.:::...:i'.i::::':.i;::•;v L•I•ST .F S.•UR•R.•• •••• I G P PE. . T... ..:...0.. .. ..IV: . :: ::::::::::::::::::.::.::::.:::::::::::::.witt�ii :3.00.fe t..o .. . .. . .ct.. PROJECT NAME: MENDENHALL PIER APPLICATION NO: 61(o - 093 1 SM SMV, EL.p The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of'the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL - NUMBER LOWELL '0. ANDERSON 3107 ' MOUNTAIN VIEWAVE`-N 334210-3880-0 BRUCE & PAMELA MILLER 3103 MOUNTAIN VIEW -A-VE N _ —3890-0 WILLIAM STONEMAN 3101 MOUNTAIN VIEW AME N —3895-0 ROBERT BURR 3013 MOUNTAIN VIEW A1E. N —3905-0 'DO.NALD"'SAVOY 3015 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVIE N • —3906-0 I2S: MORRISON 3011 MOUNTAIN VIEW -AVE N —3920-0 `5444iNE FAMILY LTD.PART. 3003 MOUNTAIN VIEW ,AV -A.--- - m r- . —3940-0 . C..B:r/MARSHALL 2909 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV:E N • —3953-0 PEGccY<,& GALSTER DUBOIS2905 MOUNTAIN VIEW A� N� - -_may —3985-0 VIRG,INIA SECREST 3106 LK WASH BLVD N r-•"= —0285-0 •"ROBERT'• KINGEN 3014 LK WASH BLVD N -'_;.., _, -038,0-0 :,PAULINE TOMICH _.•...3-01.0-. LK--WASH BLVD N:_ _: - � : .� 0385=0 AGNES , MERRELL - 3004 LK WASH BLVD N —0390-0 TANYA SCULATI 2$12 LK WASH BLVD N —0480-0 NABIL&GHADA HAMADEH 2908 LK WASH BLVD N —0485-0 SCOTT SPENGLER 2902 LK WASH BLVD N —0475-0 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RRPROPERTY TAX DEPT. 31.2405-9004-0 777 MAIN ST, RM 1.206 ' FT. WORTH, TX 76102 - " ' • .. JUL 2 6,..1996 ;AV ' J��° • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING<,a��G� °°r, CITY OF RLNTON - r', o —_ •• u A v� (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) (Continued) _ NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • NUMBER Applicant Certification I, I M. W. FREE , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: • 0 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records . 0 Title Company Records • - )C King County Assessors Records - . -. • Signed )\\ Date 15 /94 • (Applicant) G ' • NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at %eat(e on the /--,r day of +.4 ly , 19 9b . • Signed & A L. LOziLait1 (Notary Public) .:.:::.::::::.::.::::.:::•:>:::<:.::::::.:.::•:::.::::;:.::•::::.::.::'•:::.::•::•::•:::•:.:•;::::filt :•:•.;..•, ..;:.. ,; ........,...:,::.e:1t:t;s:t•«:::;::::::::::.:::.;>:.;::.;;;:.:.:<.:.:.;•:::::::::::::::::.;•:N.iii:::::::::::.:::::: >:»::.1=0..0 of:::Renton:::Us ':»::>::>:::::»::»:<:>:<:>:::<: :<:::�:::<:>::»»:<::::<:>::»>:>:>:<:::::::>:::<:::::>:<:><>:>::>:::«:;:>:<:<:<:<:::::><:tv e ._.ERTIFIC` TI:. N.;OE':'MAILI,N,.,:., '>`« '><``> <':iogi:::::iis`mmos >'<:':<<i.re<<` iL S �eX't�ereby certify that notices of the proposed application were mailed to :.::Gtty,Emplayree).::::::: .......::.::.... ... •ea h.listed:>':>prope>rt:::own:er >:::::><`"'' : : 30•::' :. <:`'' »l: { > '< �� `'` ` «a><><``' ` <: < �'' > •> >'>< > > `> >s >' . . .......... .....:......... . .. .......................... ............ :.: : ....::........................................................................... ................ .. .ii:•L•i:?O:v:4:G:4:4iiiiii}:is•::i•iii}:•!Cv?iiv}i}iiiii:4i:1iiG, w..v.......1r......:...:.:.:... :::::NOTARY ::.::::::.::::::::.:::::. ::••::..::..::.:.::.:.:::.•.::. ' :::..::::::::::::::::::::::..::..;:.;'.:l t:is�i:�iS}i:.. is:.:':i '^T:is/.v: .v: ::: ::::. ...::: ::: iii:::i :: •}:6i:w:fi .}iviii4v :::::: : �:: :vv:�::::::w:v wi i::•.:J:is i:::is .s:iifSi:i'':iy:y::i:o:iy:i'�:i: :::::.:.iiR)iiii�:v:>i:::iii:iiii:i:;:;isOriv:•i%iiiiii::•is4:biiiiiii:v}i::::;:•:4:•:Ji:4:;i:•:4:•i::::•:?;is4i:4i:4ii:•::•i:•i:•iv:•i:!•i:4::vv:4iii::i•}:•}:i:+{.:i.iiiiiii:4:i:4ii:•:�:•i:!i•i:i•i:•ii•itri4: :.:::w:::::::::iiiii::;::LL;::::.:::v:i'::::::::::::.�::.�:::::n::::::::w:::::::::::n�::v::::::::::::::::::::::::w::::.:•:::::::::::::..�::.:.�u::.�:::::::::::::::w::::::::: :•. :•.. .......�.... • .........n................... v?iv. ..±±��v.•lt•:. .•i:L::i}iiiii}i?::•iiiJi}:•:.:C'riii .}`::j•iii:::•+i::::::iii:::t::(i:::::i::i'riin.�.::::::'::,';'. : :::•i''i: :•: vi•i:•.. ,i:•i;:j:• :;Y':jJ:v}ii:L:{i:•i•i:;:i Y.(:<::>;�•�'•!�"�ii;i:?;:: •:::•? .•ii: :' ATEST: ;::Sub .pnbe.d::and::swor.>.before::me::>a:::N.ota. ,:::Pubiic°i .`: n > or::: Ssa a of:;Wa• ri:::?>;>:»>: estd).. g..a.t.... . ... . .... J the; d1y of,;:•:.. .:.::::::::::::.:.,,::•.,:• ., 1"'. ... !::l:::::>:: :::::>::::::: v •: �: ': '.:::ri: :>':i>i> i': .:. ' i:i:!its?i4:i•i:.?:3'.}:::::.:�i:•:•: :4:.: ::i:i::vi: •isi•iiii:•ii ?•5:iv?i :{;•;v k listprop.dac 6/Gf/' - REV 07/95 / 2 NOTICE OF- 'ROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM), Shoreline Variance (SMV) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. • PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: MENDENHALL PIER/ LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225 foot Ione pier for private use. GENERAL LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review(ECF) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM) Shoreline Variance (SMV) The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's'environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. e .} I. • IARF SITE -- :r 1 a34zio r NS.F. •I T AMP jer '411= ;:: S.E. 92ND ..• . .; • r to F !s - „- -ice so i 1.. 1. . 1 JR'��.i. �°• >_L• T S.E. 93RD ST 4 O 11 >,y^c I - so 1'1 a ,o 'm .s•° • le, Iv y,> ,.411a S.C. 94TH ST. • 1 • a aet .z r s,'i . j s ,.i t yF` ' .oal��al e1 I. . • • . • ' 40, GENMALOT.DOC '� `"tea ' • -+In.Vl1 lei 1 it.; 1\h'7 D"- 1 =— — — OFF L1., WO--1�V o. c fv �% I NOTICE , I.nolti.tni—GLc . A-e-i i f1 v,i'1. • H • • • PENDING APPLICATION • PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: MENDENHALL PIER I LUA•99-092,SM,SMV,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace en existing pier with a 225 fool lane pier for private use. • GENERAL LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North . i PUBLIC APPROVALS: _Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat Conditional Use Penh _Rezone _Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review _SPE1omre"ne Conditional Use XXX SHORELINE VARIANCE Pill&Grade Permit - XXXX Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the Third floor of Renton City Hell. ' • • Comments will be accepted any lime prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site • plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last dale of applicant's'Notice of Application'publication In the Valley Daily News. For further Information on the application,or II , you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental • determinations,appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development Services Division at 235.2550. / _ _ • Y i i1' ;411'ln�'l'T•g II • :sum '"' �n•. /' • i r �I, II • . / Q J. -I . 121 \im4r.,7„:T,,,:, . , 5- '\\k1 ix;:*-*G L yR It PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. I • I CERTIFICATION . • I, Sct h . j, sd� . hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document . were poste by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . ' Signed: 1 � STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . . • ) SS COUNTY OF KING . . ) ' I certify that. I know or have satisfactory evidence that Sj'i1 D / jACK, CA/ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary, a isfigiip'-uses and purposes mentioned in the insirumen . \� Z) .,e6-s,�,.4)''',., Dated: 0-19 .3t7.1flny . . Notary P is in an f r the State`alt'<1 Vgsh ri'igft3h as . Notary rint) 642 \-i-\ J.1a_ t.,\A -' My appointment expires: . /Gl1c? NOTARY.DOC , • • • , NoncE PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: ,MENDENHALL PIER/LUA-96-093,SM,SMV,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and Variance approval in order to replace an existing pier with a 225 foot lone pier for private use. • GENERAL LOCATION: 3007 Mountain View Avenue North PUBLIC APPROVALS: • Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone Site Plan Approval• XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use XXX. SHORELINE VARIANCE Permit Fill&Grade Permit XXXX Shoreline Substantial _ Other Development Permit ' • The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time'prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application"publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if • you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. • • IARF SITE, - f .fie_ -," ` a .. u 334210n1, S.F. r rL. I/�— o A �R. • fr � � Imo/ Fiq, �J M1 S,E. 93E0 9r J — L Jl „r•c of t 51. al •100,FAIIMI e ,�i;�� 1,•� s.E. 94rx sr. •e• 'I A / 1 W .i ' mom" rt • ,'b u SE. 95rN Sr. /' � •\Q\ ; . � I`: I;PLEASE;INCLUDE THE PROJECT`NUMBERWHEN.CALLINGFOR:PROPER€FILE IDENTIFICATION OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • July 29, 1996 • Mr. M. W. Free Sea& Shore Construction, Inc. 1100 N. W. Leary Way , Seattle, WA 98107 SUBJECT: _ 'Mendenhall Pier •Project No. LUA-96-093,SM;SMV,ECF Dear Mr. Free: • The. Development Planning Section of the City' of Renton has determined'that=the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is " accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee Von• V- August 20, 1996. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing,your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 277-5586, if you have any questions. Sincerely, V ' • Mark R. Pywel CP Project Man er cc: . Ms. Besse Mendenhall/Owner . • ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material.25%post consumer / ..............::....:::::::.::.::.:::::::: . :::::::::::::::.:::.:.:::.........:::.::.:::.:::::.::.::.::.::::..::........................... :.........................:..::.:::.................................................................. L.O ..MEN..T.:..S.E.RUICES.:..::.I...:..:............... .>::.::::.:::..:.:.:.�:.::.....::.:::::::::..:...................................:::.::::,:::. ismonsimminogolsolomAsTERIAppLiciATIoNsillimErlisolirillyang, MATI'.>;.N' con MAT]O ... o t ... :`'�`a n>':o"`e'.[e'�al'o:wne:r"�•lea.e.a 'a' a di ion I Notes�€�lfi�fiees�mara:ih....::.:4..:....9................,:I?..:�:::::::::::::::::.::::::::•::::::::::;:::::::>: E S S notarized:>fYlaster<Appl(cation;for,e.,ch;..;•:.n.:. ::::::. ..:. XI STING LAND E . NAME: Single Family Residence • Besse Mendenhall PROPOSED LAND USES: • ADDRESS: (1 g RQ‘K‘er Ave S 106 Construct a private use pier 6 feet by 225 feet CITY: ,Seale. ZIP: 96118- 3952 Rcnto44. .98055 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: RSF TELEPHONE NUMBER: 852-8195 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ........................................................................................................................................... none NAME: M.W. Free EXISTING ZONING: Sea & Shore Construction°p , Inc _ R8 ADDRESS: 1100 N.W. Leary Way PROPOSED ZONING: • CITY: Seattle , zIP: 98107 N/A SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE NUMBER: 16 , 700 sf 324-3434 PROJECT VALUE: $20, 000. 00 A ';<.O:;:<••N« < < '>':'>€z> «z�`»<'•M :T.. . .....................:::..:::.::::. PROJECT OR'DEVELOPMENT NAME: Mendenhall . Pier IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? • PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: No 3.007 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98055. IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AMAb,FIVE D KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): No 334210-3930-0 JUL 2 6 1996 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • CITY OF PENTON • :<:<:::::>::«:>:::.................... A .•.. .• S.GRt...T • QTR: SE SECT: 31 TWN: 24 RNG: 05 LOT 64-65 BLOCK A PLAT: HILLMANS LAKE WASH GARDEN OF EDEN NO. 01 HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN #1 c 2ND CL SH LDS • C :.:::.;:.;:.;:.::.::.;:.;:.::.::.;;>;;:.>:.;;::.;:.;:.;:.;;•::.::.;:.::.;:.;;:.;:.;::<.;:::;>;:.:.::.;:.::.;;;:.;•.::::.:::.::.::.::.:.•.T• X... ..O• .•F.•.•.. .......• ...G•••AT.••O• .N..&...�.E.�5......................:.............. ........ ............................ :>::>:««:::>:>::»:::>::::>.............. ....e.ck........... . ...).c..t..o.n..t . .......t...�.t.... . .I. :....C..t....s.ta..f............d. .te.rm......e: .ees..............................................: ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT• $ REZONE, $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT _ SPECIAL! PERMIT $ SHORT.PLAT TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT" ' $ ' • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ ' ' ' (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: .$ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: _) _ PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ FINAL: WETLAND PERMIT $ — _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ • • CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION $ I, (Print Name) Besse Mend e nh a,lsclare that I am(please check one)J the owner of the property involved in this application,_the • authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a.Notary Public, in and Besse Mendenhall for the State of Was 6ur4ioKsesiding at (Name of Owner/Representative) 5�4 � u , on the 24 day of \Ataki 19 c/o. ,‘A?)1)„,, (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Notary Public) :»»:;»:.::.....................................be............................................ L.... .U.....LLA.....P.P......FP.....TP....... P:::>:::::RV P:.:::>::: .:::::>::»::::>::>:>::»;>::>:<:: ...�............. REVISED 2/95 SEA & SHORE CONSTRUCTION, I N C. July 22, 1996 City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Ave S. Renton, WA 98055 re: Request for Variance, Mendenhall Pier - Sirs: We are requesting a variance for the Mendenhall pier project at 3007 Mountain View Ave N, Renton, WA 98055. We are requesting that a variance be issued to allow a pier length of 225 feet from ordinary high water, the purpose of extending the pier to this length is to attain sufficient water depth for the safe moorage of boats. The City of Renton Shoreline Master Program Section 7.12.05 Design Criteria for Single-Family Docks and Piers specifies a maximum length of eighty (80) feet or a depth of 12 feet, whichever is reached first. The water depth of the subject property at 80 feet from ordinary high water is 4 feet, to attain 12 feet of water depth it is necessary to extend the pier to 225 feet from ordinary high water. The requested pier length is consistent with other piers in the neighborhood and as such does not entitle the owner to a special privilege not accorded other homeowners in the vicinity. The requested variance causes no hardship or inconvenience to the public welfare or • other properties in the vicinity and is the minimum needed to provide safe moorage. The requested variance maintains the intent and purpose of the Shoreline Master Program in that it only seeks relief from the conditions affecting the site, namely shallow water, and in no way provides an extraordinary benefit to the owner not enjoyed by adjacent property owners. RECEIVED JUL 2 6 1996 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RfNTON 1100 N.W.LEARY WAY SEATTLE, WA 98107 Phone (206) 324-3434 Mobile (206) 954-3434 ■ SEA & SHORE CONSTRUCTION, I N C. Thank you for your consideration of this request for variance. If you require more information or have questions please call (206) 324-3434. Siincerel M. W. Free Estimator Sea & Shore Construction, Inc. 1100 N.W. Leary Way Seattle, WA 98107 1100 N.W.LEARY WAY SEATTLE, WA 98107 Phone (206) 324-3434 Mobile (206) 954-3434 ■ SEA & SHORE CONSTRUCTION, I N C. July 23, 1996 re: Mendenhall Pier Project Narrative The project site is a single family residence on Lake Washington. The existing shoreline is low bank with an existing rock bulkhead. There is a small beach exposed at low lake levels composed of gravel and rock. The existing house is located approximately 30 feet from the street ( Mountain View Ave N) and approximately 175 feet from the shoreline. The proposed project will obstruct no views. The proposed pier is to be 6 feet wide by 225 feet long (approx. 1350 sf), constructed with new piling, framing and decking, it's height above ordinary high water is 2 feet, 2 mooring piles are to be placed 20 feet north of the pier and will be cut to an elevation of 5 feet above ordinary high water. The existing remnant pier and piling (approx. 225 feet long and 1662 sf) is to be removed and recycled. The construction cost of this project is $20,000.00 and the construction will take approximately 10 days and will occur when all applicable permits have been issued and during a period specified by the Dept. of Fish and Wildlife on the hydraulic permit. M. W. Free Estimator Sea & Shore Construction, Inc. 1100 NW Leary Way Seattle, WA 98107 veD vat') oE� uovie c o, 1100 N.W.LEARY WAY SEATTLE, WA 98107 Phone (206) 324-3434 Mobile (206) 954-3434 ■ • :::::::.........::.::. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this.checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: • This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of. your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. • USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. RECEIVED JUL 2 6 1996 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Environmental Checklist A: BACKGROUND • Name of proposed project, if applicable: Not Applicable 2. Name of applicant: SeaL & Shore Construction 3.'i' Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 110'0 N.W. Leary Way.. Seattle , WA 98107 Contact : M.W. Free (206)324-3434 4.11, Date checklist prepared: 7/22/96 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):. Upon receipt of applicable permits 7. I Do you have any plans for future additions;expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. II List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, • directly related to this proposal. • None known 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known 10., List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • Corps of Engineers Washington Dept of Fish & Wildlife Hydraulic permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Construct a private use pier 6 feet by 225 feet (1350 sf) Lot size 16, 700 sf 2 • Environmental ChecidW 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and •range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to.duplicate.maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 3007 Mountain View Ave N, Renton,WA 98056 QTR: SE, SECT: 31 , TWN: 24, RNG: 05 LOT 64-65 BLOCK A PLAT:HILLMANS LAKE WASH GARDEN. OF EDEN NO. 1 & 2ND CL SH LDS B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. . General description of the site (circle one) .,rolling;.hilly, steep.,slopes,'mountainous, • other . • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 5% • c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay,sand, g ve peat,.. muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them an note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None ' f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally Not applica lncribe. • g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? None 3 Environmental Checklist • • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, If any: None 2. AIR • a. • What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,dust;automobile, • odors,:industrial wood smoke).during construction and.when the project is'completed? If - •:any,•generaily describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction Equipment emmissions during construction and boat exhaust upon completion.. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission-or odor that•maraffect your"proposal? If so, • generally describe. N C. •Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None • 3. WATER a. Surface Water 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater, lakes, ponds;-wetlands)? If yes;.describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, Lake Washington 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes , construct a private use pier 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) • Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 4 , Environmental Checklist 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground Water: 1) : -.Will.ground.water be.withdrawn,:or will water be discharged.to ground .water? Give . .. •.:.general description,.purpose,:and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground-from,septic.tanks•or other sources, if.any (for.example: Domestic sewage;:4industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;.etc.). Describe the general size-of-the'system the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of . animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None . c. . Water Runoff(including storm water): • • • 1) - Describe..the .source of runoff. (including storm water)...and::method'.of.collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? ..Will this water flow into other waters, If so,describe. None 2) Could waste material.enter ground or surface waters?..If so,.generally describe. .. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None • 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: . deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other 4 evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass • pasture crop or grain ' wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __V water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None 5 Environmental Checklist c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or nearthe site. None known':) d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance • vegetation on the site, if any: None • • 5. ANIMALS a. —.:Circle any birds and animals which have been observed•.on-or' ear:•the=site.:or•are known • to be on or near the.site:.(see next page) Birds: awk e eagle songbi , other . Mamm: s: . - bea elk, , ther .Fish bass salmo r,trout he ,shellfish,other b. • •List any threatened or endangered species known.to.be.on or.near..the site. .,•....• • • Bald eagle • . C. Is the site part of a migration route?•If so, explain Salmon migration d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6." ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6 Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None • b. Noise 1) - 'What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic,- equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a • short-term or a long-term basis (for example::traffic;:Fconstruction, operation;;other)? • Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction 7:00 AM-5: OOPM 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: None 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Single family residence b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. . Single family house d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? Old remnant piling are to be removed e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? SF • f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Unknown 7 Environmental Checldist g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Unknown h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive area? If so, specify. Unknown I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is.compatible.with.existing .and-projected land uses and plans, if any: Would comply with all applicable codes and setbacks 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate.whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None • b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. , 5 feet above OHW b. What views in the Immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 8 Environmental Checklist • 11. LIGHT AND GLARE • a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. • Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. - What existing off-site.sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,-if any: Nua RECREATION • a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are:in the immediate vicinity? Boating , fishing, watersports b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational.uses?'-If so,describe. N o', c. Proposed measures .to reduce or control impacts_.on.recreation,'including-recreation .. opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC.AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION • a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known ' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. None 9 Environmental Checklist • b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No c. • • How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None • d. • •Will the proposal require any new roads or streets;ror improvements.to.existing•roads or • :streets, not including driveways?. If so,:generally:describe:(indicate.whether.public or private? No e. • Will• the project use (or occur in •the .immediate Nicinit .o water;::rail,• or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No • f. • •.:.How many vehicular•trips per. day_:would'be(generated•by..the• completed:project?• If. • known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire f protection, police protection, health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. UTILITIES • ' able at the site:fliErA422) water gas riD servic• elepho r sanitary sewe septic system, o er. Oboe 10 • • Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE .1, .the;undersigned,.state that to the best.of my knowledge.the_=above 'information.is.true and . :. complete. . It.is'.'understood..that•the.:lead..agency-.may.r.withdraw. any declaration, of. non- -.significance..that it.might.issue in .reliance:upon this-checklist_should there be .any willful • .misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed:•. / . Date: Z 2- 11 • • VICINITY PROJECT INFO. ,iiFo..'nNa NY7le n•.Fd:MIHW.' ,P}}JIeYr*n,YAVr �.�.I?ilAE/YY�}u,.- 1.sarl..A.t�/Y. JNr.°+in P+' ,,„„,t . yT. :rx, a ;r � I ,.'° .. p• I'� OWNER: JOB SITE: •.� • 1 •,.;„r.: • 4 glgr ":.;a; 1" 3'^r•,'sT ' E: 2 BESSE MENDENHALL " 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N ;t1t,::;; �r'�,' �' : ,-: ,1 € f> RENTON, WA. :;,, ;r •B s7: s...?:r 'r r srf' s( SITE ADDRESS: v�eS je�iY:,H ^ /�� .,d� .�Y : , .,W;z, ,..«, .,,;. '}N:....,.N�,,,a,;,:... - i. k 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE.N ,°'II•A, •!r*':w S:n:.r:Mi tga"iIiiii iIni •so 7'. A W.7- ....... RENTON,WA. Vic., ="�"::.7t.:u...ny.Y�. N;r....;".a��{s; 'X"Y::•;•; , •-� ii " i:,�+� ',;�9a�s'.y:,� :�mrr a44;vi.".,K:M'y�+id:CS�M'4i"iYi l`i".°r. " ;i: so PL'..F•f' .�I'p1=m� - ' �"i tir' ifRl+r• �: I�rrr•'i`n�a�l::n ,.1�r�.�.!,"". r!?.! .. s •�f�*s': e .�.::'' "f; :.:41 a... ,;�."_ „h.P, r „;, j�•si;:x. s IF*-- .n ARCHITECT: r �+ ..^.i •• �.� u.ra IIIIYi •'i•�fy,Tv,:.rn a'✓.:•PfHYt.r�i«+!1 i�..•..,vt:r�Vr '�. fiN v �•'.;;�;=i-;:;:,•»:.3Ns�:s; .' :; '.:.;;' ,�;:e° ':::' :i,;�, 7y wtxr` 'ME mx _ S.M.STEMPER ARCHITECTS :4,,�� i•lia Eiji i::e:,rn. .ieii+9,'„,;iM.iv:,�•,11::11, ;pfis:�;•%^.11,st,1 i/1,11\ x,„, F "� i :i ..a;n.y.: M.Tn.q. Ha.r3JP.¢ua'y,HJy ; " 217 PINE 5T.SUITE 700 ,sr,y, a..ro.:' �r". %:MlFcrl�a} t ylril� °,�.r ■ :;us' ,; : �:} „«;;,i' ;M:1,..,. J.r s:�' SEATTLE,WA 9&101 ♦ �' :SSG:" � ' d ,v,,•.1r :..$Sr,...> a,4� x?ax sr NE sslx .6i1, a l« .Iq Aliirl 0a:M lvlrr AAs+ �``�,,, �, "� =°3iw ��a:: ac ;;s.,r,�;.#<3a7ws:� :,: "�;� �;," •' _•5 ZONING: e'.�,11g;`r �oFt .: ;"N 1ir�P"i;. ;"�illiP di,.,.'r'a ,I:, Y �Y'`i("'` :.i::;:: ,.a., ;;�::.......:.:.::w;;ls.'; '�' :.. xe mx s RESIDENTIAL 4I��� •. SdnNVCR SQ tr ,.°,.. . :�•ni:f°::Cm �;�"" "'i s,s: :'.'•:;:F,,,0,115i1; . 1„.:? TAXACCOUNTNUMBER: gil> :.- 07 ",1/ it, 0 4•,;P ;iit ed ,,,, I 3< 34103930-0 ��n-,- +:Y ?:'r w'r,non az "::"s;1•, :r min'; s;' ' ai "'''" ;` �� ,, 4 "=�.:1:1' ;0:•••;'5.r.zg7:. ,..;;u: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: `may "�, ..;,;..n.,.,,: a, ?; N' ..- REMOVE EXISTING DETERIORATED PIER AND -MN � :,4 .i , li s ,e�r: ,.r-wi::7::., :,+::eri.-�_ r°.: *y.:z,:,.os F-�J�nm+1p 'P4 �713TM �; sr �•�" ;;t=^: '�'� l` PILES(APPROXIMATELY 1662sq.ft.) Qa enss i41H. ;sT` n _ u , ;:'' • p.'I/ V .0 AND TWO MOORAGE PILES. CONSTRUCT NEW ki < i u • . 6 " '� :'o EQRuu°Ai ~:,rYa NJ.. • -PIER(1350sq.ft.)AND DRIVE TWO NEW loss sT '. ....n_.._ - .4 116in m Ofi . '.. s a , d,..., , s_, ®_� �, ,. y • MOORAGE PILES AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS 5 IIe ITN Sf — Tx I• . .. . - S''. $gm—"sr A"� s''s �' _ill', �.�1 sr w - ''amoN y DATED 7/16/96. • 3.11YTNST m o��,F;iii d ©1153 ' .`,= 1,. 3 .` 8. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S 3f11N(NS". a a' 'f 420T4F:TAk f°■® 's 1..� x•91N.z.ST. . I s Iz ._.W e:; LOT 64-65 BLOCK A PLAT: HILLMANS LAKE I�„� '>� ��a 51za�e� 9c 12.: "=i s C®�.m, . ,y �•. "'`1°"`' "� a 4' _ " ''" l WASH.GARDEN OF EDEN NO. 01 m a 2,601 i:':tlb n: �:lldD y. I.'.. . y '. f°IfAlEI f a' m p `Pl 5 5 122N1 ul..e; S�'ST m" c'�'. +AOT7lERS=' st a `�'°0 rqo x.44`, W Y d¢salsl2:°ST 0. "'i` :. !n" • • ' '" • HILLMANS LK WN GARDEN OF EDEN#1&2ND s iza'z.., R� 1:-..To' s a �;i2aTx _€ sr �^ A ''ITM 'l. _-__ `1 i N 1-ErFS,. gl% i.: r1 I ".non_. '.>1==. IV • lj l�EC A.r�IV `�' .'UV 2 6 1996 pEVELOt'of F RiT�ON ING CITY PURPOSE: REMOVE EXIST.DETERIORATED MISC. PIER&PILES BESSE MENDENHALL (APPROX. 1662sq.ft.). CONSTRUCT NEW PIER(1350sq.ft.)AS SHOWN 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N. IN DRAWINGS. IN:LAKE WASHINGTON • DATUM:0.0 EST. BY C.OE. 1919 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: AT:RENTON OG. MORRISON COUNTY OF: KING STATE:WA 3011 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. • OAGNES SHANE APPLICATION BY: BESSE MENDENHALL 3033 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. SHEET: 1 OF 4 DATE:7/23/96 , I\, / EXISTING ADJACENT PIER. G.MORRISON EXISTING ADJACENT 3011 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N BOATHOUSE RENTON,WA. }I Y : " EXISTING ROCK BULKHEAD.' NO CHANGE IN SIZE OR ' P/L CONFIGURATION p/L N X 30 0' PROP011E5 5ED MOORING OHW 21$' BESSE MENDENHALL 8 ^ - ..' - --i i OUTLINE OF EXISTING ' 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N DETERIORATED PIER& RENTON,WA. R1 i PILES TO BE REMOVED / PROP05ED PIER,, t o 225'-0", AGNES SHANE 3033 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N EXISTING ADJACENT RENTON,WA. ' MOORING FILES EXISTING ADJACENT PIER PLOT PLAN iwi SCALE 1" = 50' 0 10 20 30 40 50 A' PURPOSE: REMOVE EXIST.DETERIORATED MISC. PIER&PILES BESSE MENDENHALL (APPROX. 1662sq.ft.). CONSTRUCT NEW PIER(1350sq.ft.)AS SHOWN 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N. IN DRAWINGS. IN:LAKE WASHINGTON DATUM:0.0 EST. BY C.OE. 1919 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: AT:RENTON OG. MORRIS COUNTY OF: KING STATE:WA 3011 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. 2 AGNES SHANE APPLICATION BY:BESSE MENDENHALL 3033 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. SHEET: 2 OF 4 DATE:7/23/96 2x6 CEDAR • DECKING, FASTEN W/ (3) 20d BOX 4x8 OF #2, FASTEN GALV. NAILS @ (4) W/3/8" SQ.x 12" • LOCATIONS EA. BD. BOAT SPIKE 6' - 0" +I Tr CV 1 O.H.W. f I f 15.13' (NGDV) 2x8 CEDAR FASCIA W/ 1/2" RADIUS 1 ROUNDED CORNERS 6x8 DF #2, FASTEN W/ 12" DIA. NATURAL 3/4" DIA.x 24" SPIRAL WOOD PILES BENTS DRIFT PIN SPACED @ 12'TYPICAL SECTION A SCALE 1/2" = 1 '- 0" PURPOSE: REMOVE EXIST.DETERIORATED MISC. PIER&PILES BESSE MENDENHALL (APPROX. 1662sq.ft.). CONSTRUCT NEW PIER(1350sq.ft.)AS SHOWN 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N. IN DRAWINGS. IN:LAKE WASHINGTON DATUM:0.0 EST. BY C.OE. 1919 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: AT:RENTON OG. MORRISON COUNTY OF: KING STATE:WA 3011 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. OAGNES SHANE APPLICATION BY:BESSE MENDENHALL 3033 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE. N. SHEET: 3 OF 4 DATE:7/23/96 x , o 32 y. a0 auom o. 'T.. .. .. .. ........,... .,.�....�.:—..�:.�..�..=�.:�..�.•a•.�.•�..� . .._.._.._••FIL ..-..-.._ EXISTING ROCK BULKHEAD. (NO CHANGE IN SIZE OR CONFIGURATION) N - BESSE MENDENHALL y 30'-0" y TWO NEW NATURAL WOOD. 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE.N. • MOORING PILES DRIVEN TO - • OHW 21.8' "^--`s4 RENTON.WA. o s. :% ' >REFUSAL, _ .... , o ———-,-- OUTLINE OF EXISTING" 12"NATURAL WOOD PILES DRIVEN TO" [ . DETERIORATED PIER AND ; REFUSAL(35 PILES TOTAL) c ^ff PILES T0,BEREMOVED. 4x5 DEL STRINGER(TYP.) SLOPE�— N •R..REMOVE(2)EXIST. I• , ' ,'.--(APPROX.166254ft.);. PROPOSED PIER.. �_EXISTING RAMP.NO MOORING FILES 11 12'-0 /// 6x8 DFL#2 CAP(TYP.)• (1350sq.ft;) CHANGE IN SIZE OR �i i7miii ,T'6��� i ii 1 .,1 EI ' I�� till vi CONFIGURATION ,l� i�l 'iiNc II 7ti� 1 �I�ii'� Ili:-:: :-: '°= `--: k. 11'i�l' i � �il�iv. I Gi�. i PH,_ i P/L ro 225' 0 £' �¢ ¢o 0 fir. , Q C PIER PLAN SCALE 1" = 30'-0" N 225'-0" EXISTING ROCK o BULKHEAD. (NO 12"NATURAL WOOD PILES y 12'-0" PROPOSED PIER CHANGE IN SIZE OR NI DRIVEN TO REFUSAL '1 NP. ^ (1350sq.ft.) CONFIKGURATION) OHW 21.5' \-- I /4/4/4/4f4/4f4/4/4/4/4 / / / / / / / / / / / / f f f f -H 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 N. 4 4 APPROXIMATE in / / / / / / / / f f f f / / / / / / / / f f f / / / / / / / / / / / / / / LOCATION OF f / / / / / / / / / / /4/4/4/4/4/4/4 f 4/4/4f4 f4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4 f 4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4 f4/4/4/4/4/4 THELAKEBED / f / / / / / /4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4f4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4f4/4f4/4/4f4f4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4f4/4/4/4/4f4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4/4 f4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 A. A. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 / f f / f / f / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / f / / / / / / / f / / f / f / / / / f / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / f f / / / / / / / 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ' 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 S. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 S. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 f / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / f / / / / / / / / / / f / f / / / / / / f / / / / f / / / / / / / / / f / / ELEVATION/SITE SECTION SCALE 1" = 30'-0" PURPOSE: REMOVE EXIST.DETERIORATED MISC. PIER&PILES BESSE MENDENHALL COUNTY OF: KING STATE:WA (APPROX. 1662sq.ft.). CONSTRUCT NEW PIER(1350sq.ft.)AS SHOWN IN 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV.N. DRAWINGS. IN:LAKE WASHINGTON APPLICATION BY:BESSE MENDENHALL DATUM: 0.0 EST.BY C.OE. 1919 AT:RENTON SHEET: 4 OF 4 DATE:7/23/96 - o for- .. �,,,- 0 s,--".� .; I. p ��,54 •so ..*se,\� 0, e,bz1 I.,'a, XkNIN VI 11iu d()IJ'a_ r Cfl, °,°r Cli, . -4.CY-'-----..---H, ,..-- ���-1 o y, o J "7rd Or.z) vt li3 333E1\ \E' ''e` --i . z 17S • HISS 3 'S o `6 sG'1r d u 101 ot-I 0E loZ - I I ns I 2•1.L .\(1 �9c, SL�pbw , .-4°\ .nlrl �191 055o -VI : vQ .zl , IN y i ^Z\� 0°`i° • : �L -� •pe°°'�`t a/. 1 °� Soy :1/4 \ f� �. 1 • �" b I. Z1_�y4' I4\''''' I -(r-CA-2--------1F-Tik • �r� - 1T a £ r I s 19 I A g 4 d51. �. A� y N,, \ " I , f� I I I j os I ,' s c'9-b I y b� Q� ' \ T/mob 4.) I A \ I...' o0o0`cs P • '1S Hlt76 '3•S o o , �9, ., , ..°°pe' vE{.O o tbo • °I.. .. . 1:1; 8'111 •• 9• `• a� oo.L`" n'"'\•v,aa IOAoGEO • Ooo,�.61 81 LI 91 I S1 'y1 1 IA ZI°QyQ4 Mil 1 4 t — ,` <i 0' ,. r_ _ , , ..:„. ., . . .- L_' —°°� z tC H- f/� • ny. L, A Y oo��t 0 °Iy,,ko yF o o�``O ��a • ^O 1 i 1 n Ow 0 ,,, s o sf' s°e1'S 0gG0 5 agl0 0�oe4 o N J/IS` ,Z .05 ,,i50 Al o r s Z U 9 9 L 8 I4 6°a°'b l / ` _ ...' •�° . +�v ►� cps z•�4./ J /' . • ji+.„`• _ �.ol,.np0 1S Qr�e6 .3'S o )\ r Bs o\�o i.c fs ca :<f I{ u,4o IOS .�ezo94 1 `'1\ .Z '4l j. _�_ s s.c.,.-n I---,rJ t,c�4ys VC VI 1 n —f— �1� o.,.id 6t 0 81 4IL1 91 SI j isi I cl P 21 0y\ / AI 1,1 S y� Ltib°� r-r�; -�-- do °7.4' I I yo4.al ' 7J °09 ` T • ° 0•1.Lc _ -_ 3 JpOt5 I s605 V r o cM` -- rl V ' r 0 f I AV 4 yl li./ I - ` ° it's 0 an,d' - - \rocizu Ul AS 4• - _ o @ S eld - ,.h4••Lo Syt° s.S ti`�1 OI, /\_Zy y'') .Z > °i ° ti''r• •?�L_ r I 0 0, 0 otn _/°4 4 o L £ it S' - L g -P )\ 60•�� r A o� 0� J'f y (�nb ' r+1S� .. OS �6'Lal 4 . OS 441,01 -_ , uq'� • '1S • QNZ6 '3'S I„ ?r ow4 — cs1E.vz: 0 7 6D I • S OS Z'9Y+•1 I sozo 0020 0610 N` i e)Llo gb °af,,,� . Z Q / u91 sp is1 O£10 z1 N \ Il0.1b.' e Lt. Qyc,¢p'°' �F a 01 Iff F a 'n — — n /g 0�1° 0,21Q � .... .. 11-io - d~ D // wy: �t� o1at. ,,,e.60e,,/.�f..� _ ! I osl?J I i� 1 IN 60p9.1 /41 I ���U/ / 7/fT N —7Lt Id I 1 5 I S P Cr s tiJ 7 as V S I I 9 L /1 ' (gl•b • N19 ,D ' rt, / SI"v‘ ----717•' OI Z F. I• / O j r 1,i _• \` Oq7- ,TbF.b-.1.M aotla °nv, JaVI 0 ` J g 0 _ �j► fly, ✓-/ aw,c-�iY� /• O oof l.goy, ..i..6 97 Kits ,9 Np 1,01 ,z s ,. s t.L . •C'. r`O ole VI I. 0fa1�i. 9 1/d � lelYn.00000, . . or 1 AJ �c 1 a.w-u 4 a,yl, D/ti 0,,e a.01 `��E,Y/£-IZ IpA°NOS ZON l':`:."�l ii / $C ar i **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 07/25/96 10 :49 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9603803 Amount : 1, 505 .44 07/25/96 10 :49 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: sea shore, 12561 Init : JB Project # : LUA96-093 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 1, 505 .44 This Payment 1, 505 .44 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 505 .44 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 1, 000 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 250 . 00 000 .345. 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 250 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 5 .44 n 4r, 3N Ci