Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA96-136 (2) • ) ___ -.) Drt S.W. 34TH STREET z 's J.� M4--X- d - oz3 --- - - I I p zrw zs,as -x , V p`saoe • . 1 I 11I 1 I z tG.IpOV'S %�;!- 3 w Ix 2 58860' / 3 Ill -J J N / O 66 — ¢ a w O cn /�/` 7 tr _� // —_ w x A_9o0a' „0.•• La 47•51 ,..//.•••i, 10•I 1 „ 11UOCIIIIIIIImIIIHI IIIIIIIII�HJ[ 09 i ii Q6 il —T OlO. �ii II va a c' `te;5oa7w ,ca sa L"I"�-i W. _6056'3. DATA,_ ip i.zi3a s . 9 SINE PLAN — - - .,�..,.., s g p �■� .;I l z I i , I I I MI • I I — ---0 P I I •I I O I I I• I I r=t,r f I I -----o i Qv .=irm j - - -0 o� — —0 I I � \ lkHa�D 1 ---Q m ti 1\j ,I I III mm O ro �� G A III j ■■ \ -0 I ii %'� fia — O r Pi r- -'`-,.#0_,':\ IL___® - - Q j �opJ�;�i . I I I ---_-© I I1 -7 -- T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Q I , O I I I I I I I . IF 6 a Q gyp' Ea m ,— G.IITJOEOS TOEERIR RETIONS 1 :„ :, n=ru NW...—,., RfNTON. WASNINOTON il IA�IAp � ----� ID H I I I IN ' I I I I 1 °ell - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - 1 — 1 - - - - - - - ' - - - — uu�•;� I I I I I 0.0 o I I 0oaIll , I I F I I I I a II 1_I_ 1 ICI I I 111 lilt I I 5 - - !:/ i \ . 2 / t ,_ 11 1 1 I 1 �__I . ..in. I TIll • I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I l �� /4 CD I i 1 O b 6 6 O • FLOOR PLAN y. s._ -EKA:..- z G.I.JOE'S STORE i I 11 ' OOCOO;DOpo _o®�>r=. 1. I,� PLANT „@ P CO 'O 00 O s I ettmo� eouNlrlL NAME"ocrrxx NAME :::._ soma 6 =R dOO ft: Ia• o see- O�,' ,'}•,.,�:1 .Q .M.r DL.a vu>n 1. 7\ , qO '..i ':, 0,f� PPS..MORA.xlu,Lam..m..cOL. .>,. D.a l+.ioeo wra, 1 1p I'„ a�..}: '" r�wwm•,.wStreltr/OPPIIT e� •�- em,uL•mw OM PIA TCWO FONT 'e /•fir , ,.fir.R I"` SWIMS yd ..a`y��s��yy `•r I �J •��1�7 �,4:. <n SWIMn a..i.OCT.,.,o<.Im owra®el�w,ew i..,m�. A,..alms.<•oe '!G� Off: . n ',MM.,.w�a,.w<n AnL o lua. P � O ,.r, P - UEmI.wawa aL m u o l e.•oc ;I I � PO nt.ow.rm..o..OLtm[01 LAMED. I', _ . 1. / CS 041 <EIunI / 'eo/ r!. 1 GFCVmGGVER L'ZrA,ct, 'A i:.0 it':-1-', C010GISTEP 10.6PAST,COT0CLASTIA I 4.11_ Ife OL. R 00 • ///? J /' rL , c- ' aC5 3EA 3EA 3EA• 3EA 30 PO r _III" ,.�4• GL ` 51 ` . d / 4. . A4kis PL # LANDSCAPE NOTES: °u Q li r ___ , �� ��f 1 DUI DALDSO POW,APPLICATICK Saou I '" E',s+ ' d°6 3cn�� s� ir ▪e.a>OICAlED 0,111.i re e,e BE BETAT de ow wa m i/I� !� s E„ s v' Er, a rE. pp WALLED D.ALL.c.Iw.otaLm ""„ e �,�. .i2L2O O P� z0 PL is Po- s Po ".. 1OP � �j / �_ 0 l � iii- iT944 API" • INSTALL A PO..INTO ohoDP.. .. _ 't1141 .0.00.1 — SPECIFIED WAY,.TO PMD/IDE COMPLETE CO.M.A1 PI ALL PLANT.. , IP a 1 �E>,tP CONC.<ET,w4l ___ _ - , yl L - Ex.10-CONC NET.wnl :+ j, OP• TCF e a^'�>ioTHE d2 Ptnn+e wld rui.cal.s aoAWmmN -I�L_•_.-._.�- N i "'L---..--T .. a.m..... 0, CURB ou- .- < y _i , .., MAMMAL. rwmn�ou wow ru. R,K,..L,ro.,..l. Ilt "11 _n M▪OORS uLL INDICATE owm,IE». .e„<,OIE,SITE AND In. <IN.c.L.a W PLANT TOES IA.— 1 • i \ / \ / \ �olzie,-« 714 wl.ODSCN,beAtIPPE:L51;;TS, Kv } _ afA�l,~J— IT 11=11=il=il-01i=1i=1fgalr Q CC < 11-II=11=11----1=II=1lalfi Z mCONTAINER L��<�<. tiK Owe., .1 -/- M z i a CCOG R� Oa aeP'wrcAA 0CN GRADE TREE PLANT LANDSCAPE PLAN G o • ,u<,. ht--t- L-1 ., -. ... .•,....:-.....:i.--:-•;-.-,.-:....---..::..,,-,;::,,,.. •-.,':•,,-...;•'.;.'•••..;',':::.-i•••••,'....•!...:,t--- :•.':-;, 4':.. '. :'.'•- . . . • ,.. •... --, ....,_,': ,,,..?;..„...-,....:),-.:1-..t-;„: .,..-..-..„:-.1,.,..2.•1-•-•-•,--.•.,..,5..„-:1',:'-.--;.;-::::. ( ,,,:i•.-....-...!..;.,..;--....-„....-,-,•,-;."4*-,-;;;:e‘.:-.•-..'•'P'•;:,'''''-....,;...-..".,";•'.'...'"' .', • • -.!•, _.=•..,....'..,..--.:•••_ ,.,',':.---,-,•-I.,:••-••".•-%..: ,-,--.. .,..;...1.,,--„,-:.:-. .-',...1S.;,,.F,e-,,,,K.,;,s.ry.;,..,-;;;;,•,......(.:-,1.•;;....;.....7.4.,..„:•...-;:.....:-.;'.:::z;';',..,;o•-;-:.f.:-, ..,.Z!-...,...,- ,i..11.,,Z..;....,.,.•., --,- •-•• .'.....- , -••g-,.%-1 -1-,,...-...f.-',..•.',-.. -'• . :.:./.,•-',.,--:',1.--9..'• ,-;-..,-."..='..-..;'•;:..-.2-:..;";-c-..'..•-•s,::•.::-....-',;,. -'- . ,-.;-.„-.:.- .,,,,,,,.,,r,,---___i*, ,,,..-•-•--.,F,'RENTk,.1.4 ... .. .. ,.-,-;:o.q;i:c.,,,-?:...:-....:,.:..-,;.-1s.,-,i,;,;:,..-,....,:;' ,,.-:-;,,...:1--i7:... 4,:,..;„1-4_,/-:.__...2......" .,/. . . ....._....._. .,.-..,-. . , ..-,. - . -...4,..,..,.. ......„ %-:,..t... ..;.-.•-)„..,:.5.,,.,-..,z,,,..,;....-,:_,. ,....-..,.:::,-s;:,...._-4,-..::-„,„.::....!..:.,y,.........,.......-„,.:::?-..-:::,,...,,,,Ty ../..-,-:....-2.-- ,,,.,-,‘...-vi-,:,-.:,... .... -:::...--.1'•-,----:--T4 b4---',..— --_.--,,t.,.-"- ---:,....-.,...,....,:,.:,-,---,ff';.-... ----::-t.,-;...,---.-4...:;,i.v.,.:,,.':,,,::.-:..,-,:.;:7,7,,..:.-,.,:, 11)id".*.i:pg/lipb ri.c Works.,cirl?Department;:-:...'7: --. '.,- :..,--.=',--:'..S_dZtir •,-.--:.'..i;i:`,..':;,:.•-:,.•••• -.-•,,:.1..:.:7•:.:J.,,F,,';',. .,,ik,,p'::•;.,Z".,.::,:.1'..';',.J:-::,••'-,,`;::':-.._.:;.'....;-:,.."',-'':?....,.".:-.:';'..{-:•Planningiiri,,. P E Ari irtor-:.:::'•';':.:::'..:',.. ..,''-::-.:::-.'.-4;:";:,1:','-6.;i1 -Ti' ;',.i.......,..rf,."-,.... ...-....:'.....7...$5,.:',:-,:- .1-:;..:',.-,..:.:•1:..,1,,::::•:.;,-,-..:.-_,'.:-.,-:',-',,-„,::-.7;:,,,:.•-•,.''',,:. •2:,:,.-,..:',/:,.......::::::,',.,.•. ..'.,,i,::•-. ..-;,-Giegg i/parrnin.7 777,__M. 1MS, . .., • --''.'"!-•:',:-•::•::t'•.;.2,.-.:, -. :..!..-..:-..,.,..--, :: ;:...-:...:!,,,,.-.,,.--..',Y:-.7-•• .•''•''''',. .•' :.':•''''-''7. -."'''• '' ' • .. .'.., ' „ ., , , ., .,- •--_--' •.-.:,,'7. • '':. Jesse Tahrier,Mayor .-:-•: : - - ' - . •• -. -- , -.,. ,. ., -.--. , --...- -_.',.......,.:::: -,.,..,:.......,1.:..."-'-',`. •'. . : . , .. '.;- • : -. • ,....' . : - ;,..... , . - .•%.':- V -.-;•:. --•:- -----', ':"-- .. '`.. - . .1 4.'•••-••.,:.;-_,..f.T.;::::':-:,•:.:.....',i':'. -- ;•:'''•-•'..-1.-:-.' '' -..-'''';',..-:;:--,'.:.-!..;.::•-•',..:..-..,..'.',...' ' .•• • • ...;. ' •' ' ".: .'4.-..' '..`....'-.••',' ''..` -'... •-: .. ' '' • '• December 23,1996. ".. .iv.:.-..;.;..:,..,•-..,.i....,f.r.,•.:.-..,. •:::,..,:-..;,...., f.,.:',.--.--•:.:,•..:.'.-'-c.;....-....'.-,-..-'-' - •,-' -'• - -..-' -.''. -.. -:'.".:.-i-......:,:.'-:',..' ..:-::::. - _ .. - . •,.-,,. . ,..,••.•-•.-. •. '--;.- ,.... .;r2•:-..:T.,';',::'.:•••7*;'!''-'''''. .''....''•:-...'• '• .':21.';:-'1. :::_"! ‘.:.."-'•••..'.'''',:"-:'"•-•t''..-': ••,.'',•-.:-•-.',.--- •''''••.',...-,:,.'- '-`,•.'... k':;-;i::,,::•••;-,'.;•'',.- ,':',',.,.:-",..;,,,,"..'-. •.,`,,-.,-.:..•::'...,:. ..•, ' .'- -, '':- •::•.:,:-...;•„:•.::`:.,-:.•`-,-:.--'-, ..:••.!:'• .'-,- -.,' f,r,r.•-.';*.;.--..-:••••--.--;‘,--.-Y•ii.•;;;:;,'*:•',;;.-:''' .-'...-..':...=:•,‘,:••',7;:-....,;'i_.,..i,;-,:'.'•:7.''.:',:''",:„.:'--;'::'• .;,.,.2;;.',7...'s...,:'.•-,..':'.'":'.•,:,---,,:',;',...7.';',:z e''',•.-'..,....7_:?-:‘,:';,,:-'.''4.,I."]- '' 'I.,:;',,.',.:-;r'--$:(:"T:;:':.:,;',..:-.;':.:,:•'-•.-;;,-.-,:,..,';;: :...-,.."..,',F7:;".',:,.,.,...:.,' ,‘''„..„;:--,;:.:,-..';.:i,=.:.,:•,!,,,'''',-,‘':1.1.-:'".:,.:.-3.:,--.`,;,..:-3V:2;::-.:'.:'''.':".:'-:-.:•7_:'...-?,:1'...,;g'_'::-I.`,':,'..,''''....;-:::-.'r:;'-.."..:,_.'.:.:,.;,...;,....,..,---...--':-..:,:..,`.::-•- •":"'-':':,.....1.4.-:;‘,::';'''-':;,- ;.!;....v.-..‘,':.,:e...',-"-•:,-;;.'•:.-....,.''.f-'.',":-T:,..-•.:•',....-,,-it•I",1---...-.'-..,'.,-.2.-•;:::- '-''.:.:::::;:-•-.::.?-,..'..',.2.,.. -:',;:...,:;A-.,,,,,,.•:..-.: . :„...;,::.-,....!;. ......:.„._:..,;:.-..,:-.:..,...-,..!,.../._:„..i.::::.,...,,,.,,,,..,:,.,...,:„:„..,......-..,.,......;,-,,.,,,,.,.,....;,........... ,,•• •';Mr:Barton Treece i '',...',-.:,:....,.:.-.,..'-,;',::;;.,.:;':::;!',2.,, .-•.•.,.,-i-_,,..,.....,-..,:t-,,,,, ,.-_,,...,.. ....,,....,.......„.:L:„..:,::,f„,._;,,,,:.:,:.:„,..,.,,,,,..,:..,. .,:„,,,,,,.;._ -- --,'-,7'. .''''S'.'--- '•.' '- Dennis ‘‘i Associates f „ ,„ .•': ,-- .....' ,..-....:.:,,-... .-,-...;•.:,.:.-F.-.i•'..,',-;''..-`-,:.-47.',", .:-.f';.,:c.':.....,-..'.',,::---':-•,--',.=.•,-;-:.-;_':-.-.:.-1.;,-.:-.:::•;::.-,-4.,i-..:.„.,...;.-• •-z.,,,,,-:-_,........•:.•',..-.".' •i.L.",--'2...--:-...:-.:'':-f-Hcitorl -fe9Pis : ..,..,-1- •..,---,,-,'-i-'..:' . c• .,:.-J7....-:,;:- . , , . ..:::;..''.;?. ,.''..,•'-:•- ,.=',.•-•.. ..,,,;r!:J';-,-:--i..;.':::-....--1.',7;•,'..-"..,..--,1..;.--7..;.-C,,,',........-'....'... •":',......'• 32-0•Sect;nd Avenue South ‘,.?--:•?:;‘..:,.,-;.•.;-?:.' ' •-..- • . ..r,..::;.,-,-•:',':::::.v.:14.'zi,..:....,,,,i.;•-:;.:::.1.•;,;--',.-. ;,_.;.,::;.....,',.!..:.•.,,,...!:„.2.:.:,:.•••••::.:„....•;-.,..,,-...,y::,.-:,,:-;:r,,,-;,...•:„....;:,-, ..,....:,:-..,„_. -...-*.-::::',k;''24.t'''...,-;.:';',;:''.`;',:*1.1iiia'nv d';i:W" A--11:98.03' ...1;.:-;.---.1:':'.::•':"ft.:1'-.'' ''.'-;-',',•;1:1":::.for,' ':':3'';'-,' ''''..1'" * .,''P..if':•-;','..'.'-';':-''•'' :.,'•-''';';'f-T.;- -'•:;' -''....., ,,','...-- c-,--:::,;:.:.:i..--.;-,,f,l,'‘,:„..i..--.1'.1,.„'.',.-;.:.,1-.,,,,,,',/,'.-,....,.,•:;.•.).",":;-'. .•,' . ' '•-;''.-•;..` -.. .--.-.`.-.....,••:-....,....•...„f:,..,.-2.:s:-.--:-.-•-..'--,:i......:::-.:::!...-;,-...,-.,•,'......,.....,,m.,.,....,..,,-.32,.. . ,i,,,,.f,,,,.;;,-... ...,,..,„•-..,-„,-.1..„-,.!.:::,i,--,...;c:... ,,,,.„,...,- . :.,:.,,,.;,.„ i,,..„..',....„,:,:,.,:.,:,::.:,-,..,;•.:1,,,../ •-.:::'-...'i'..-.":: ili,.'-';.;•:...''r..•'..;',...:.'-=':::.,.'.7-,'..!' ". ---....--•:.2:',-,...,.. 4:.0.;.,-;;,,,:1-,-;:4,-,,ri-,:'- '5:."7;"'f....tr,-.;',•-6',:,,-",1'.-,•>-.•;•e.z.,.;:•:,'••,:.: 'X:,.....%.--7'..,/,,,::•',...':--•••,-.-',.r.,.,:;'4••••,,_,;,...;;;,:.;,,:ti,',-,,:•••• ,••:•,;,'.--",,..;.i.:,••,•,,-.•' ''- • -..:J..*-{',-;-.•'..`,'..-.7::-...-•-,H...-!'.,'..',..-;-i:-." ••'''."-:-..,-...,.:....„.•.:',':.,•;;;:2,-/::". •s•,..,.:;•Lf,,;•-':',.....e.--k>!.:'...:.,.,.---,,,-./i.,0.•;,,- -> :.'''.'.A!yr:,-',',:'.'.:.-,-,'..,..:', -.•.%7.,1'''..'7-'1-,' ::;;/.'..'ri:--.,,;.,.....•'.',...-,.... ;:r;5',.%")",,:;,-.-.-..-;.:'.:u...'.1:,;..,',„: :-,.,,.,,,::V..:,').,- ' . .'"4 '''''''"'- '- ''''''''''''.''''''''''''-'-'''''.:' '''''''.--.'•'''-:.--."'-`:: .. '''''• ,- .-Zk.t,-'.•e:••'',:'':17''',--4';',..;•3•;:,!*.!.71'; '''''i'77,‘'.•!-:,.'7"r•••••i6??'-;'t,';'i,. '-•;•,'.•,,i;•7;;.-0",..:11.•'•'7,,.,:`:---•;•,;:,-,:;,[,"„-,-?•,.. „.$-..,.;i..'..,,,7,...."':'!._;•.:."`.'..;:-;''• ''..,%:•.:.'?:"SOBJECT:-.'",..22:::','G:I.'_:" oe s. "',•.,', -'-.N,.1-4, ----.1....:37.,- ,,.,. ....:...z.,;-?v,_-.....‘0-',..(fk,,,,, ,--...,,--.-::-._-,.-,-,r ..-..,,L.-. ).::,,-,:m4,16-„.-.•._,-..,:zi,-,--.,':.-......-_=,.:,f,.,.,•-•.•••--- •''''''''''''''''''''''''''."-'''''"--'••"4-'''' ---;ii.thleCt NO''''llUA96-1 36 SA;ECF6.;,. ..-...i'-:/';';'•21,:',-fl.:7".1,, 2.",;,,, ii-,5%, ;+t , /.:3r t•fT,•:-i;-‘: '',.;'''';''-'. t;!.-:•:',7,.....‘1-',0:.•,1,,e.:*.•'•••,;,.7,••;;-, -'''''.''•:-...,('•'*7'''''''';7.q.-i-5' j . .-,....- ..'-• •.---,- --•- '',. • ..4' .);.,1.7,...-.,;:,:-",:o.,'-;.;;;tiii.t.,64-w•Vir?..:„.:.;Y•‘;:f445tI,,ii,;13.....1.-7'-t•:,. i;.::•;.•?, ,5',:,k.i:_,:',,,,,-;!;4,.k,i.;!,-,.,, ,,,..,:o.•.'....-g,;.4,:z.,...,•,:.,:,-,1;,.? 2-:-;7,•`-'',':(A...Z.,4.-.1i ':-.'':;,-.0.Z-:•,i';..-.,.„.:. ',::,•i... ,',4 . .. : , zi.''-' .,.i':-,;:.4:'.-i- t!,,;:4y,,,").',,,V4.11,„ , ,.<.'-i :ie=2,-1z.. .,... ,-., . - ,":41;q.t,.,;,•:.:,,,,,'.:,...a.,.z., ,i,A.-,,..:,..?‘i:;:q,".,,,,..,.:,.... .,......:, .,.... , ),, -:,•'. ':;`, 1 ...-i.z., ,.'',';',;?•'...-';:'':!..;.....-,c7,--,.:;':',',. ..-ii.r,`, ;! vi'-;0.',*, ,,; .11."..;•,.i.:..!',.4.,•*.r. ,f;,:-.;?-f,, ;',., :•''''.;pV....'.3:t;.C,"-:-.1 '.;; ;;''.t.s."?',,:?;;',. .;': -1.'..''.".•:ts.:- .,.. ...,..,--‘,• <h.4-6,,:-m r:.:„Tre6ce::••:.. ?;,••• •t?-:.:4-',5„ , .?",,,:i;r2;;;4",.,?'i,":::,t1:4-.1,„Vc./..:41;•.;;•4$"...?..•,92,,lft•T°:$'`:.•?-:::,i'r.;.1:"...4,4i'','•,,:,Cr4..!;.iLl*:,`,'&•;' ,7-11;;z-i''...,41'1.C.;A:,5 f.:•::::&;.•...;f:2,1,::,&:,:-,';';';,:,•1•;',.<•:•(::::: rt.•'.y'....•.,.:;.-,:',.:,t;......••• .,::-.'";•;,-:-...•:.:'`....i'l.,?...c.,1•11;',-"g,',•;,,f,il't.t.f,, ; g.,:r;v,;;,:‘,.--,,-!••:;;;;;if-,47.;A:••••;s:.-,-,-,r„;...-g•,,,,,,..X:.-4,,,,,, -;;,,•;`,..q.lotItAmezp.;;;;;,:i.:•,..,,,w,41;;,-;;;•;:',:i;',,W•i.j.;',.,,,,,,44M:,,si,",k`;.,"•:•',.:, f,:•••••••e,.••'.%:,3z1.,,--.•-•.••,;..,.-...,,,./.•...4-.-•••••,;;;;),4.,•1 .•-i.•-., .:,!;-; ••••••''''''''-;Lt-f'1'.,;;;>:::.f.'1';'-',7',71-Cr-- -4!•'-'.•;•':'.•',-71'.•'- :;'''g 1.-,.•`-•'-;.:::.?..t7, :,'%'•,',,I??,'•,';'/-i';'•"-,Ctr-P't,•';-*''':1): i;:t;''t"'A' i'deilodefieve,••.ended for the.., PY11:9...111:1Y.,, 0!.-.:...,..,:.,,,......,... :::-••,1;•.: ::'.:‘.;;',-...;if.!..'.24,'-i;:r,':-}:',4•2if.i'YI .€.;1 ;, .4".fl.-',InfO'rfn'9dij'Atiat.the-tdn'iMq01.,:iiP.ropp9! -..-...- ..,_-_,.,,,_,....•• ted fOf.;tne':abilve.-refdrerited ....,.'.--.'-..;,-...4- 1 !! ;-!F!,. .:• -T -.--.,,- - •-6 rs i'n i rrn"''.11iiiiiii,`Oft4o6--Signifi cance,;,.;.-:Ir!!!0 ,--:,-,.,., a'r:c-.4,',S,,;':,;',.-. ;;;:i"..,,j,'-:;;:y..?.'z',,,-:i.,,-;;;:,;;;;::.,:,t:`'''.';':.:,:.f,,,:;,:;:=•. Review i:c omr ri 1 tt e el s (ErNLq.i'.. eI-.7...=. .,,;..q..,,..:,',,,,,..-.414,',,... ..-.....1:-.214:4,,,V,,-,'-'"L. 'if,',..:,,,::'f.',.. .t--?1,z,!"- .,:!,-.;,•,-1,--,,,...',.1-''.,i.;fl'..i,`„ *."'',-,'-'.-,,--..4:-.,„0,,..'?".4,;',,,-c, ,.. .--•;,•.•-2,,,,.... -.-7...'.`y.„.`-'-', ,• .....,:,,,,,..-..-,,...:,;•,•,,:....,,,, • ,,,,.:„..,..,,,,.•:,„--...,,,--..,.-:,.,..--;;;,..:;,.;',...,:.;,?4,`,.;----,...-!--,,,,f,,;,'-i?,•••:,,..:;.-4,.,..-.,:f.- . 4,1,ilvy.,:::,(4,i.•:.'.,•:"..... .,....;rj,.:•:;f.F.,..:$;:•-:-/'-.,,,':.'-:"PV.;;'.';.:Y4;,''.`,.•-•:....V.,'-!,1V-"-'-..-';,•, ..7.'.,f,,,::-.,',.•.:,...1......i.,.-;,y,-; '.".k.-• •-'‘:,•:"!..!;•...'.:,-.. •...,.',.:s.:-.'...'',.*:,..'...?:-..":•?I'5F,-15roject.f.'•:'-,.!...:::4•:;:-.'•:k.•,•„;-.'..-;•:,•1.-...,;.;,,,..„,..:-.%:.:!:::::4,1ii,:.$'•%;.-i".,-.:•.' ;";i•f•-;:;.-....'....i.r,':,,'...'?n,.,1..(,,•:,...'2,-..-;...,..:,.::,....;.5.:1;„.c„ .,.,, ,-,,,-;-_ .,..!..;,,q,,:..;.1.-°,,...,...7.f{?,•;:,....y,;-_, 0..:..,-,,, ;,,,.,,-,.....i--,,,,•‘:., ,,fv,,,.---..,-... '''. .' -:. ''' ' 2.. ' ': ':. : Ii. . t.''''.. .'; 'f:'' :1e''' D)r.o.-.1'1 as.ieli Li.6'tiiiii6d permits may :' '':',;1.- ;-:•' ' ' '' I'''''fis.' ' • iSlibal .g.n.q.,. .PIA!9.41p.c.9,..„,.P..,,,Ti.t..,,,,...P.P....,.P.‘'.- proceed a t:6ii.' 'Of iPiiii:.;61..:5!,..z.-.;, ' inil'Elkt Mitigation Measures-.anclC„..„, ., _....,...., .,.;--. .'-z....•-pz..:,,,---,; ' , -, •applicant must 1 ..• '...-:.'...,:. ...,.-:-..--...:-.-.:.-N‘ ..,•:•r.;.•;!..,,,,,.;:,.-:.z;.:.-..:',.::::.-.•,..z1,,,,,,..,,,_,-,%-.:-.:!.2..--y,,,;,?;,.;••,.t.,..ecy...t.,,,,..e,,,-,: r.:.>,.1 .4.-i....i- -,--...i...,,,,,,,7::...-.:;•-,f.:,....,.,(1;-•-.;‘.i._..,.;;-•,,,,.-,:,.:.,,.,.•:.,-,,,:::,,,-,, .•.. ....„•,-,-; • If.• ,,-....-Ji.u......•-..4,-,..;:-,...,....,-,:.,:-.•,...T.-:',:::>',....,::;.•,:!:-..,..,',.:%-..,,!:-F.,41.t..--;...',.-•gi,..::(•,:1:',,,,,,,.f.,:-:,'-v,=,,,,,..v-a., 1:235:..271 9..7.:.."..,,-.....;-!'";_,_,--..,s,:,,,,2„::,..,q:.,,;.:,_-,::;!:,..;.,.::,-j:,‘,:-;',..-,',,.;-,'•;:-.;:f!,4..:1';',:;::,,;.-,-, -,tT....-,- .you have any y ' -.......questions, please feel free topo_n.a.,..mp, :_,,,....,,„;,f:.,..;•,5.,.-:. ;-,-,-4,..E.:'',.'-',,c,:- .:;,.;;''i-'."''',---?;','•-,',,,:_•,--.-•.*:,:.?,.','...•,...,‘..--.:•:;..,.,.'-,?-1-'i.,:,•'.._ 4;i:',,-;51.r.P.1.-.z?',.., ,:-.-1--:.;:•_?,..:,_,,,,.;'. ,,,.'r-c.:.:-„,,'",...,,,..i..1-;.,.1,:,4..E:::',•::..".'r;-,,;:li''.....g.-:?..:,,:-... ...:`-:':'-;,.':'.:2-'. .Pt:....:,.1:,;, •• •i4..'. ';;,"•.: ' .--:••••-•.:-,- -, ; . ..,•-4\:.,;:. :.-1;:; - i.'.z-&.„- l -.-ft., = „- '-.. .r.', ...--;. ,:',•.?.,.-,...':,-';':.-,;1:',-..--.,.:.:-.z.-;:•‘!.:...1t:.-...-,:-, :.-::-.;-:::::...,5_,.t.'.-..:-...,-.-.....,T;,-.-.:•,-..;:::'!:..... ,',.:. &1_.i-i e..--iii.,-i r6,6,r6.-r4 ar Review- - -.. - 7 .Committee,. 1::,--_::,i.:.,."....,---.-.:..--,:' ...'_,..-'''.,, , -‘,-..s:'_-:,-,'-,':':-::,z-;',';,...'....:,--,'--..'•-_•, .--'....::-_1---;,•:.. . . -:.,..,-;.,' .--,,,: --f'••••7"-,..:‘,' ..,.••',. -,..,..:,,,'.- -- ',,,:::-.;•••:'','''......r.; 7.-•..22,':,:.^-,;!.;•-:..,-,;.-:I:::',..;'-.-6--;.''...•-•:".1.'..",:'.::.-'--,'`...,''-'•,.,),' . %-.::7" 7,'•''-:,-,,:;;;":',.. '" ::-':;;,-'•,;••••'..,.,„•• •'•'.-7, ;-,-1,•'";;.". ...:;';' .-",'.;f.','.f.:• '',••, --':•:-,. %.*.'...:::•;4',,,-,;•..:;,j..•:„:',..:',:'••.'••s•'':4,-;'''..-'.'-:-':. .1.;-•‘:':,:;-",..?: .. ::',:'',2.,,,''.••: •••.' -'• •" .•-;..','''. .:rr ...": .''''''.."•-'''.;.-..'.,e.-;,:',;7,./...2--",.•;.;`,z-.,'':v;„?..':',:,-.:•!,':!;',?.,•.••!-':',..- .,-':•--• .:-..::•:,'"::-''-1*.••_:'.---'• '-'...-.---••••.,:-.,:----,'I:•-:',..',7•••---....:•-•.,....',•••-''_':•• -'.-....--!- '••.• '-',..'.--,--,.........,-,-..t. - •. -f.:-.±;---,'-.'YT:w•,;:..'..•, .- -'--;----: `-.J-.•-Y•,•-='"-.. --.:.-..,,...i: -".• ...-..-.,,„ , ., • - , ., ,- , • .: .••. . ..!,•._-_—_,--•,.—-,:-:- - .''..-,, •.• ,. --,,,..,, •,_-• ,.._•,- .,- •--,.. -••, .. ... ... . ' -----••;-,..---.•,,,..,,.....':‘,.,•;....':1,;-,--,-,..,':','-,- ',..'' ‘.'••••••'•-•'..-''''''''''••'''''' ,-'‘-".,...."..,• ',-ff.-i.t,..,-:;'.--,..-J.,-•..."...;:1•-' .,--•,,•:- ..,!..,..--.,:•••-,-,.....,--:,;.'''.;..::: '.-",':'..!,-,••'.?:-.. .,:-..-...,-l'•.;:..:::-...-,':•.::•-:-..•.7.•,.,:,.•i.:. . • reter Rosen„-;-.,.::-.:-,,,_""7•.,•''..,"'.'"1,..,'•••••.;.:::•,:.•;',,,'.'..''....;e:••...;;••'.,.;.• ',,.",:.--••.,-,:.'7'•-2.- ...'.•••:-!...1.,`"'-:-,„•.;:-.,,,•••,,..."....),...,',,,‘.::.!..,,.,,,,:.--,,...:•.,:.„4 ,,, .•-•,.;,,.....,,,,v:,.. . . •''•-,•1.';.,"•z-.,- ;-: '•st-.., -•-•:, ''-;.•-*•- '':••,-,',:.;••••,',.2.,7'•'''..6'..:-.-',7.-.. .,'..../.,,-.•.....>"7.,. .:'Y...•••:,•.:-. -r'''.:;':._,,-;"...,;.":?ii..-:k"?:";%"•il', •";:•.'..,...:3 •',••-.1•('?•,:.,;i:1_,,-.'..';,',,' •-..y..:,..,-Z.,...„':'.;Z.:.:•.'''-':•.,!..,!:..): -.;`e:,,"•.,`.' ''2: '''.2:.•"-;2'''':kc-Project.M4ilag9r''' 1-",-*---;';- ' ::: v , ,.,-.' ,.;.,' f: .:,...--',.1-,.,,'.?_.;-.f-Ti,_',:. .‘.,..-...7:.... ::::,:-''.:,...:,- - ,7::::.1...'1 . ,,,...:.:_,.,... ,.......„?..,..::,:-...:e4,A,..:,,,,... ..,,,.„.,..,:,...,‘.;.;..,„-,,,,,I,,,,,,,.•,,,,..,,.:-..-;:,+..:;:,:;••••,,...;,i...,....i.:,.,,•.2•,:7-_,,,;,.-,„;..-, ,,-,•,, -..%... :,:-,t, ,.,..c.,- .;,..„-;•„". :',......„,-.-1•,,, ..t,....---,1,. . .,s: ,,.,/,•!r:i,..„ ',•,',.`", :t.•;;•:;::'•:..i:1.- :',..',..-- :jr.: -;'j=.•:;.-,•!':-`..:'..';'7,.'::',.:..'- .L.• :----",-:,.,'..;,....::,.„ ',.."•'-:-,-;,':;...;,:.',,,,, ::,-;-;z.,...v,.5:..::,,;. ; :,,...z,,,,;. •,.].,,,,,;,:, '2 ..,:-.V,t,T...;.:-.,Y- :,,,;s.,:-..,, *..0...i„;•il;:::,';,:e.:,,,,,,::::.:,: ;%.!...,!';;;; ;;;7:::.;,•:?:--;1-i, ..-.4,.: , „:'-,:: ,, - ---,......:...,";•,..",=:...'•:.1:-,..':.;,-.?'',--::'-,7'.', :,-, : '?'/%5.-;:1:"=::::',--1':,' ;; :,.4'' ' ‘ . t;, !. ,;,'.1:.-'-:':" ..,:;`.:::::':::• ,=:. ,,-?`.• -,7:irVt..:V.,' .'..:.,''A..',i'-'''...',,‘ 5;i.",,"',''''''.".:•'2,.'.?' ..s,'•:• ••,:,:.-.i...,,•,(=-...',.',-.;'•••_.-,.-4-i,..,---;.•-..•:,.'±,-;-,---;: : •..„--.-..f.,-.1..;.,....;;:„.:?:.,,,:-.:,.,,,-„t-r,!--..,.•:,.:k.....,,....-..,,,s,...,,,:„„,,,,.,:7-4,,•±:,..,.,.,„:::__-_,;,...;_.,..:,:,:',,f.,.,.'„?,..f.,:••••,,,,,-;...,•;:‘,._-I ',?•ii..,..,,...,-.:::.;-•,,,„.•:;,-.ci;.::;.-..,,,,Ir .,...:,..--•_7„....:t-i;',i-.,,.!.tft,,_,,;;,,:..,„.-„,-!::;:,..157e,c,,-17,:,.e..,,..,i,.•,T.......,,::,i7,,,,i,..4.-,,, ,,,,,,:.-..',.....-;:',,,;;;;=::,,,t4.-!,0:,-:,%;y:„.:;:,[2::,,,,,,,..,f:!,--.:1,;:,:-.....•,,.,--;.„: ",..--,i..,ff.:..i-,...,,-,....,.:,:::,;:,`,...:::::;-,,,,, ,•:r._;.;,. '- :-.. .-,:.;;•-•:_.•..,-;.1-.-,,...:',,,,,.-:-..,.••,--,k.,.1$;,!„:,,;,-.--:_;v.-•-:„..;,.:.•„.„:,..,,.,,,,,-c.•,,,,,.i-.-„,,,,;,:•,..•.7.,.,,,.‘,..!•,,..-,...4.,;,.....-,,,„,,,..:-•:.,,, ,,14).,,:',;;.,•;•,•,-;',„1,I.:;`,:••••!-,‘,.('1•;,...`,":.1::1•;::-S-7>•:3•1::,:i;•'-',.:;.:-....L 7:•';',••;:',‘,•-"',','".-.,;.;:.7:2,-:•:,:',-,•••••',,,14,„;,,/: ,:,,,;:,,,..:,sr.4,-yi.z.• -• •-:-....:-',.T..:".-.-4`;;4".:.-:`, .:,'t:':':.',.4.:.-:::,',,..'''-..:--t',--.'-'...:','';'''.k.,..:7','7,3,.",'?Z•:k,..X.;'"1:'-',",,i.,h,^1.,;',::,-,-.6'.':7;•;.''..,:•,•-i...-.y. ,,... , ,.,7..;,....,..;.;•1,!--.,X,r=•/;;;?., lt.'•;..t,f,:=. 7",":•.;;•,.;•;; ,14.4•.,-..a..7,'4,;,1:- ,!.g-.. , ..4. -..,,,,,1:,...i -:,:::::'„i,:,,.*:,; .''''-r-',7;;.,,1:-..-,:.,-.:;:„.....t.,,,--,,,:.,t. ',...':-.;',.-.',,-':..1!:.'::-:::.1':,:•,,-1-::1 4 ,4, ,; s1,.„, i,,...:„.4,.,,,,r,,.0,-,..,: , ,,,-,:;!.!::.,` ;', fill-, ''r,:!4.•--;.41§ ; --•. ..!.: :1•:,' ;"--":'',71,7.•f•;',.42:°.,.t•7`.4'.'....t, ....,!1'jq::'.,i,i.::;:-:.::.4.: -:"'.:',.-,'-','::,. `•-"7:1';';;;;', 1!'-;','''';-.-"'"E'.7.7:4••r :.1;: f'.:1:''',4.241 .‘" 4),-:';::•Pii`,.;-'-t 1'5;1 N-' ` ',-7, v Y 17, '.;" . 03 ,,, -i-?*‘.-':LI:,'',':::. 1,',`'.*::;.;:f';';',;::::;:. ;',... =;- 1j•?-'.:7;:.,,,:"..7.'.1.. ::-;..:4.:::,:, ,...s,-,.;,,r;;;,:::,-,:;_,;•:,..3.7,,.....?..;-.:::,ez,,,,itz,,,..4,,st..;4•K..,„' ,14,?..,;.-,,,)-,:t..0 r.„;:, i•,--,•••••,•s.,.-4,..".4!.....t,"g•'....;,. ,•••••7•74-7.-ii,.,.-7,".,' '7"/,.- , - _r".-7•':!. ..:•,:‘,.'-'!;Cri,;:1,.-7,:;•!":, „';,.;„,,,:t,,-••.;,,,,;.'„;"..7',,•"_•,_.!;`'.•:,:.7.,f. ,t'..44.;44.-il',•-,7-il-,,e.'1':,';,...,4;.- ., ,. -t. .•:''',----'.:--.,T7r'•'11":*•:''',14:7.=',"''.0'i.1-''• '47'i'i''-' ,••?-';'--'•-'4''''''' ''•• 7:('''.5':'•'.1•:'' ' .:- '• "•''''''-';'.'•-•!;:41,'•••• •--, L ;," '' ..';;:•.;-!'•''•••2••;'1,A ;Y-4.,'1;`,4;',,'-";1';',•;•':,;' :.'''•:4',"-•;•:.;':';:"•'•'-', '- .-•- ! ii't,'.? . ;' '',-':?..*-''',',,-,.;:-,;:::',:: ".,;:..-„Zi,;''..-.-,,,.,'4.',,- ... ,1:•:.,','..'-',.':'T4:4'' 'Hr'''''''''-'-• •. ". .'' .;";': 'z;,-...„';'''';',.,.-'• .:;','?..---'-.":-,--"-'7;•...--.-:-, ,',.%.`- ',,-''':.%".:...',;..:,';-....'7,•.:.,'",- -. .;---.:' :;;, i'',-.: ,..74•'.•$„'- -,,..,tt,`,.,virA4,1A-iV€:-..;',.: ,;•,.'. ..,V,25?, ,..„', .'•...7f ,-..i;,.:;.,'.,-° ,.,:.f;:,.,7,f -;f,;.-:.•, -. '.1,11",i..6-•':', . . .:::'ir.1-,,::; -•';',.,;,12,;;;;'''::!:::`,7';''V.,';!:5,1- ;:t3':' ,;:'' '''..::: -14:, ,‘;.C.:•--,,';•(:; '?'..i.=-T'-'•• •ittr4-';:.4..'' s ''/ ' f'' ' 74.",*; ;;;:;.;;?,-•::::,1::;=;:t,,,, ,4t.0,44A,1+:..„,?:. . ,.........::.,-; , ...7-.,....,-F.t.,....,-,-: ,,, .-,74 ,.„-,i.- t-frv -,0'...i;.'„, .,,,,' 1 .„,-,.:„,..i,, ; I : , ..,4.,,......„7;,:>4.;,:kt.--1100,011;,v ,i,;Aiivei,i- I,A",-f,,i,,-;:--- ,--ty, , ,. -J.,,,--, .—.4 --,-4k,,,:. , . •„ .-_,,,,: :-., ,,,.,...g,-,'-141, v• ..f, rif....ft,1,-..,,,,11'., -'.„ .„- ,Aviii,w, 0,- ,., ,ii--:- ... g.,:,;, 4v.!,,,,2-$4.4,..zr.- 4 . _ -A.L.:‘,5.,„ 1,-i, .0-...1;,,,,.,:-,. ''.--2,.,..., --1:_:,,..4,,... . ' . ..,,,,,',o. '..-„'Y5,,-,. .....:-..2;44t-i;,4,,,-' ,-,;', (740-4 -. - 4' -.,. - -,. 41.-:-,,...•• --;"--•AroAqt kl,..' '41Hil„*,.• -,.•, '' li '•';•••••• -. 44••::,,--•'•.'-te'-'•''.,'444.‘...,-.4,-,-,,,---.,6',.-...-„iitai:.ww2,„-t•,'..,:,..7.-..,... ' . ' -.".--...'4•:t4-..,4 - -.^. 1-0..f• z.4.5",41.;!-:',1',...,.,&,-t .. ,, ..-3;...?,,,,*,,,,,,,,,,-11... .,,,'4,., .e,,,,,krk.,.,:;.:, . :,'''.--:•lei:51'tioi. .. ''. ' tAX*4-;;;?Wr.. .• ' - .'''''',7.0 .•.'W: ....4.• ..!!0:4--;:-'.. . .. oF . '-. • --- - ,.),,, •,-,--...-rt,i,T.;;:,..-*4-•4?:•',-,-ffi'-44.."', - ..•':'.",...-'2 TJ.T.".,t,: ' : ::.;,-,;-,...:)_'4i,.,..','11,AC..-fr. .,',i...i. _.,......,•.-,• , n 0.01-ne.k.-111.‘;;,•--i ..,!i-,‘,---;,,.'--§-,.,•,-,..,-..-r'' •••*,,,,,:••.'•-V,,,' ,C- -•- .'•`-: •"• -?,-7"'`'''W'''''•DOCUMENT:3,- •:•+•`V-4-k.-5•,-,A-;- -- -- - ''•- - ' 7.7.--112,1.'il- - . .m. ton Washington.,OU4J ,I....,•1;ii.:?;.(g-T:f.:;:,,44Y,';',..j;',';',::,,J%•'...,..z :;•.-.:•,,.;•...,:2_,:,•. ;... :. - '•.••':• -;'i45^i'-',.,17.7#r*Y441r, ig#VV;:',- ,;.r,,-,',1,4:4•MOO,' illOYSDIPCS°%^1!,-7',air ' ' mo,,,,iitultilgi-,1i7.4-k7;'---.---:-'.': --''''.-' ':.-....,-. ' —.. ---- -. . .,. ---..'.-....'..;•;,,r,'-.A,,,,,,L-f.-.;',-%t.1.-4------.-,-',--,.'•- -..-''.:-:,-,.--5:-z4, azI,Tti. ----.-..:,-;---- :.i.,- 4--,;','-,..,---'''...,',7.,;• - il-,. •:-.--...-e.4„:, .paper,containt'50. Wr_ea, iar le0 niateii.al,..20%pti.Pt pcps . .... V - __). RE E;v King Countycb Metro Transit Division Design and Construction Section, DEC 2 0 4996 Environmental Planning and Real Estate 4d Department of Transportation o VELohviENT p 821 Second Avenue M.S.122 CITY p PLANNING Seattle,WA 98104-1598 F r1 N�'ON (206)684-1418 (206) 684-1900 FAX December 18, 1996 City of Renton Environmental Review Committee • Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 DNS (Mitigated), G.I. Joe's,LUA-96-136,SA,ECF Dear Ms. Henning: King County Transit Division staff have reviewed this proposal and have the following comments. The site of the proposed GI Joe's store in Renton is at the SW corner of East Valley Rd. & SW 34th St. There is no Metro transit service operating along either of these streets. The closest service is one block to the west along Lind Ave. SW(Routes 153, 163, 247). Since there is no direct transit service to the site, nor are there any plans to operate service along East Valley Rd., no transit related improvements are requested. It may be necessary for Metro Route Facilities Planners to evaluate the locations of bus zones on Lind near SW 34th to see if they provide reasonable access to the site. • -- For additional information regarding bus zone locations, please contact Paul Alexander, Metro Transit Route Facilities Planner, at 684-1599. Thank you. The project proponent should post transportation information, including available transit service and ridesharing opportunities, for employees. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Or- Gary iedt, Environmental Planner Envir nmental Planning and Real Estate g:\.oap681.doc - Washington State Northwest Region •, Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North • Sid Morrison P.O.Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 981393 9710 (206)•�'4!' HVED DEC .2 0 1996 DATE: December 13, 1996 • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON TO: Peter Rosen City of Renton,Project Manager ' • 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA .98055 Subject: SR 167 MP 24.15,CS 1766 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-G. I. Joe's 41 112'. ) File No.LUA-96-13.6, SA,ECF 44Ats• FROM: Robert A. Josephson,PE,Manager of Planning&Local Coordination • Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North,MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 • Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project which is located at 3401 East Valley Highway. Our response is checked below: We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. The Project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. X The State recommends that a traffic study be prepared to analyses the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak • hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures,if any would be required. . If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name • ............................................. >NI'> • • 0ILINGENERummamagiiiimalaw On the altil day of V \If.W\tG.Lr' , 1996, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Oft, deer IMIWochGV1 &Ind Ili ept) . avid UectsllT\ documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing martin Ptat.Kno\ . C-. . tees • l - • (Signature of Sender) LSeo STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 6,9--/vl) ' K ScCGCIe signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/ er/their free and voluntary act for the'`ruses".;and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: / :7 �,. Notary Publ' n and fo te State of Wa liffitgn i„,':1` • Notary(Prin :--G-�}� My appointment expires: �o •r' • Project Name: G,.T, abes Project Number. 1(0 _131v, NOTARY.DOC ., 4 !///:, , r — ' CITY OF RENTON Report DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& Decision ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION • DECISION DATE November 27, 1996 Project Name G.I. Joe's l; Applicant Horton Dennis &Associates, c/o Barton Treece File Number LUA-096-136, SA, ECF Project Manager Peter Rosen Project Description Proposal for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 square feet. 226 parking spaces are proposed. The project would be accessed off East Valley Highway and the parking area would be connected to the shared access road with the Home Base store to the south. Project Location 3401 East Valley Highway • Exist. Bldg. Area NA Proposed New Bldg. Area 55,031 s.f. Site Area 3.7 acres,:160,905 s.f. Total Building Area --55,031 s:f. . i a 1_, s T - I ---] • • We , S.W.34TH . •FAHWEST STEEL a, a^:a .. .j -`. i `' �f • MOME H.ARKIG-1 yj • - BASE 1.----1 W .�y i � W Z b koloil) 1� . A �! •'• '�1--I1-I •••••�I ¢ I IH . : • •sT. g III g IH .ill d` . ill I h-1 VALLEY to I / i - ii Lr S.W.41ST ST. _.— .- Project Location Map • sITERC.Doc - �� City of Renton P/B/PW Department ' Environmental.._: rmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 2 of 14 Part One: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The proposed project is to construct a 55,031 square foot bulk retail store. The building would be sited in the northwest corner of the site, close to the intersection of the East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street. The building entry and main facade of the building face south toward the parking lot. The maximum height of the building would be 44 feet which is due only to the jutting front facade. The main building height is approximately 25 feet. The parking area to the south of the building includes 226 parking spaces, and is aligned with and connected to the Home Base parking lot directly south of the subject site. Along the entire west boundary of the property is an existing 30 foot wide railroad easement provided for the Burlington Northern railroad tracks. The proposal includes a fenced, unpaved boat yard off the southwest corner of the building. Stormwater facilities are proposed along the south boundary of the site and the stormwater is then piped to an outfall on the Farwest Steel site directly to the west. Access is proposed via one driveway cut off East Valley Highway and the proposal is connected to a shared access drive with Home Base. Truck loading enters the site off SW 34th Street, with truck wells along the north facade of the building. The site is well landscaped with a frontage along East Valley Highway and a landscape buffer separating the use from the railroad. Part Two: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1) Earth Impacts: The site is basically flat with a maximum slope of 1%. The project would require importing approximately 23,500 cubic yards of fill material from local borrow pits. Soil erosion could occur in connection with the proposed development as the site would be cleared of vegetation. Erosion could occur during rain and/or wind storms that occur during the construction phase of the project. Potential erosion impacts would be mitigated by City Codes which require the applicant to provide a Construction Mitigation Plan and a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit. Mitigation Measures No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 2) Air Impacts Dust would be generated from grading and construction vehicle activity,temporarily impacting local air quality in the area of the project site. Emissions from construction equipment would have a minor impact on local air quality. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be effectively mitigated through best management practices of the required TESCP and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. After construction the impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exhaust from customer and employee traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measure is recommended. Policy Nexus NA SITERC.DOC y. • 5 _ City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental. rmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 3 of 14 3) Water Impacts According to the applicant, approximately 87% of the site area would be covered in impervious surfaces. Surface water runoff would be collected via catch basins, treated and detained on the site before being piped to an outflow on the Farwest Steel site. Stormwater quality treatment and detention will be required to meet City adopted sections of the King County Surface Water Manual. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measure is recommended. Policy Nexus. NA 4) Fire Protection Impacts The proposal would add new construction to the City which would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee would apply to all new construction. The fee is estimated at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. For the proposed development the fee is tentatively estimated at $28,616.12 (55,031 square feet X $0.52 = $28,616.12). The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time that Building Permits are issued. Mitigation Measures The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $28,616.12. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Policy Nexus Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting Ordinance, SEPA Ordinance. 5) Land and Shoreline Use Impacts The proposal site is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH). Bulk retail uses are allowed as a primary permitted use in the IH zone. The proposal use is therefore consistent with the adopted zoning for the site. There are no land use impacts anticipated with the proposed use. Mitigation Measures. No mitigation measure is recommended. Policy Nexus NA 6) Transportation Impacts The project site would be accessed via one driveway cut off East Valley Highway and the proposal shares an access drive with Home Base, located just south of the project site boundary. The north driveway cut is approximately 280.feet south of the intersection of East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street, and is separated from the shared access with Home Base by approximately 220 feet. The separation of the driveway cuts are adequate for vehicular circulation and safety. Staff-has recommended that if it is practical the proposed driveways accessing the site should be aligned with existing driveways on the east side of East Valley Road. The proposed bulk retail store would result in an increase in traffic trips, and would be subject to the City's Transportation Mitigation Fee. The trip generation values are based-on the ITE Trip Generation Manual and staff estimates 3,857.15 average daily trips. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be $75 per each average daily trip attributable to the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimatedat $289,286.25 (3,857.15 X $75). Construction-related truck traffic could impact traffic flows if occurring during AM or PM peak traffic flows. This truck traffic should be limited to off-peak hours. Mitigation Measures The applicant will be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Policy Nexus: Environmental Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Ordinance SITERC.DOC ' City of Renton PB/PW Department Environmental'_„,_`.rmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 4 of 14 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: IDETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant will be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being.issued. Haul hours shall be restricted from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of $0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $28,616.12. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental rmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 5 of 14 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. PLAN REVIEW TRANSPORTATION: 1. Off-site improvements required include sidewalks the full length of property frontage to the roadways. Include pedestrian ramp at corner. 2. Show existing utilities on construction drawings. 3. G I Joe's driveway on SW 34th St. to be located opposite the driveway on the north side of SW 34th St. which is the Teutsch Partners Development. Show both driveways on drawings. 4. All Utility and Transportation drawings are to be in accordance with the City of Renton drafting standards. 5. On construction plans show existing driveways on the East side of E. Valley Rd. and align the proposed site driveway if practical with existing driveway. 6. Provide title sheet with civil plans with index and vicinity map and legal description. 7. Trucks will not be allowed backing or loading maneuvers in the public right-of-way. Sufficient space on site needs to be assured. 8. Proposed easterly access to Home base not recommended due to short 35-ft. throat distance at entrance to E. Valley Rd. Recommended throat distance for the combined use by Home Base and G.I. Joe's is a minimum of.50-ft. per the Transportation & Land Development manual. The access location increases potential turning movement conflict. An alternative location should be consider-or'control at proposed location provided such as stop signs facing the north /south directions. 9. A sidewalk extension from E. Valley Rd. to building front should be considered. SEWER/WASTE WATER: 1. The sewer System Development Charge is $0.078 per square foot of gross area, but not less than $585.00. 2. If the project requires fire sprinkler system the floor drains are to be tightlined to the sanitary sewer system. 3. Plan and vertical profile required to City drafting standards. 4. Sewer clean out is required within 5-feet of the building and every 100-feet thereafter.. 5. Minimum slope is 2%to R/W. 6. ' A back flow prevention device is required when the floor elevation is below 22-ft.. 7. If the project produces fats, oils, or grease, an appropriate removal system shall be included on the conceptual utility plan. STORM /SURFACE WATER: 1. Address the Core requirements and Special requirements in the drainage report. State what will be done to meet the code or special requirement if applicable. 2. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5000 square feet are required to discharge into a biofiltration system. 3. If the proposed development exceeds the threshold of Special Requirement #5 on page 1.3.5-1 of the KCSWM then a properly designed wetpond must be provided. 4. If the proposed development, exceeds the threshold for Special requirement #6 'on page 1.3.6-1 of the KCSWM, then a coalescing plate, or equivalent, oil/water separator shall be provided. 5. Temporary Erosion /Sedimentation Control Plan required: 6. The System Development Charge is $0.129 per square foot of new impervious area, but not less than $385. 7. _ Survey datum to be per NAVD 1988 Datum 8. Vertical profile required. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental rmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I. Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 6 of 14 WATER: 1. A loop water system is necessary when required fire flow is over 2500 gpm. See Fire Departments required fire flow for site. 2 One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Fire flow requirements indicate four (4) hydrants will be required. 3. Water has a system Development Service Charge of $0.113 per square gross area, but not less than $850.00. 4. A conceptual utility plan for site plan is needed which includes main location, sizes, valve locations and hydrant locations. 5. A loop water system must be located within a 15-foot utility easement. 6. A proper back flow protection device is required for the fire sprinkler system, irrigation system. Show location and size of each. 7. The primary fire hydrant to be within 150 of the building structure , but not closer than 50 feet. The secondary hydrants are to be within 300 feet of building structure. GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,250.gpm. Four hydrants are required. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and 3 hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure.. PARKS 1. Landscape improvements outside property line (within right-of-way) are the responsibility of the property owner. POLICE Police estimate 28.45 calls for service estimated annually, based on the size of the building. This area of Renton reports a large number of burglaries and thefts from construction sites. Police recommend security fencing and lighting. Tools and construction materials and equipment will need to be locked up when not in use. Applicant should consider use of a private security patrol or guard service to monitor the site after hours and on weekends. Police recommend a monitored alarm system and electronic price tags to help catch shoplifters. AIRPORT The proposed structure is located southwest of the airport and outside of the 14,000 foot Airport Environment area. the requirements of the Notice to Applicants, pertaining to Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77, should be adhered to. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental ) ;rrmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 7 of 14. Part Three: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION Report & Decision A. Type of Land Use Action x Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade&Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No.1, Neighborhood Detail Map (Received October 30, 1996). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No.2, Preliminary Storm Drain, Water, Sanitary Sewer and Grading Plan (Received October 30, 1996). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No.3, Landscape Plan (Received October 30, 1996). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No.4, Site Plan (Received October 30, 1996). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No.5, Floor Plan (Received October 30, 1996). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No.6, Exterior Elevations (Received October 30, 1996). C. Consistency with Site Plan Review Criteria: In reviewing the proposal with respect to the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31-33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following Issues have been identified by City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers: A. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES The Comprehensive Plan designation for the project site is Employment Area - Valley (EAV). The following adopted policies generally support the proposal. Objective LU-EE.a - Provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Renton. Policy LU-212.8 - Recognize viable existing and new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office use. The project site fronts East Valley Highway which meets the policy direction of promoting commercial uses on sites with good access and visibility. Policy LU-212.9 - Commercial uses may be located in proximity to existing industrial uses when reasonable buffering between uses can be accomplished and when adequate accommodation of deliveries and loading to industrial areas can be maintained. The proposal abuts an industrial use, the Farwest Steel site located to the west of the subject site. Burlington Northern Railroad tracks separate the sites and the proposal includes landscaping that would further function as a buffer between the uses. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental=____rmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 • Page 8 of 14 Policy LU-212.19 - Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses. The proposal includes street trees and landscaping to provide an attractive streetscape. Policy LU-212.21 - Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged. Incentives should be offered to encourage shared.parking. The proposal includes vehicular drive connections between the site and the adjacent Home Base parking lot. The Employment Area-Valley designation includes policies which discuss allowing changes in . zoning to commercial or office zones to achieve a balance of,uses that substantially improves the City's economic and employment base. The policies support consideration of Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning along sites with access to East Valley Highway. This policy direction would also further support the bulk retail commercial use proposed on the site. B. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS; The project site is, designated Heavy industrial (IH) on. the City.zoning map. Bulk retail uses are allowed as.a primary permitted.land use in the IH zone. The proposed building is setback.20 feet from the East Valley Highway.which.complies with the required 15 foot minimum setback.along.non-arterial.streets. The setback is landscaped in compliance with the code. Across the East Valley Highway from the subject site is the Employment Area-Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation. The IH zone includes a "special setback standard" where an IH lot is adjacent to a lot designated for commercial, office, or public/quasi-public use on the City Comprehensive Plan. The special setback standard requires a 20 foot setback including a 5 foot wide landscape strip and a solid 6 foot high barrier along the property line. The proposal is required to comply with the special setback standard or receive a variance from the requirement. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires a parking standard for retail stores and department stores with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 parking spaces per 1,000 feet of gross floor area. The proposal includes parking for 226 cars which is within the allowable range, equal to a ratio of 4.1 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. The Parking Ordinance requires parking lots greater than 10,000 square feet to provide landscaping in the interior of the,parking lot equal to a minimum 5% of the area. The proposal includes 15,020 square feet of interior landscaping which equals 9.3% of the parking lot area. In the Green River Valley, an additional 2% of the gross site area shall be provided in natural landscaping, per the Soil Conservation Service Environmental Mitigation Agreement. This requirement would be equal to 3,218 square feet for the subject site (160,905 s.f. X .02). The applicant has not complied with this requirement. The. Code states that the natural landscape area should be aggregated on one portion of the property and where possible should be located contiguous to the natural landscaping on adjacent properties. The natural landscape area on the Farwest Steel site appears to be located on the west portion of that site, precluding the ability for the GI Joe's proposal to locate their natural landscape area contiguous to the natural landscape area on the Farwest site. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental be-termination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 9 of 14 A fenced outdoor boat yard is proposed to be located at the southwest corner of the building. The project narrative states that the boat yard would be unpaved. The code requires that the area be paved or improved with landscaping. Landscaping would not be a suitable surface for the boat yard so the applicant should revise the site plan to pave the boat yard. The code allows the outside storage of vehicles/trucks/trailers, materials, products and containers as an accessory use where incidental to the permitted use. The code requires screening of the outside storage with either an existing structure, a solid wall or a sight-obscuring fence a minimum of 6 feet in height or up to a maximum of 10 feet as required by the bulk storage ordinance. C. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The subject site abuts the Farwest Steel Distribution Center to the west. A 30 foot wide railroad easement with existing Burlington Northern railroad tracks separates the properties. The proposal includes a 10 to 15 foot landscaped buffer planted with Lombardy Poplar at 15 foot spacings. This landscape buffer will quickly grow to effectively screen and buffer the adjacent uses. The proposed bulk retail use would be compatible with other existing and anticipated surrounding properties and uses. The site access and the layout of the parking lot are well coordinated with the Home Base store located to the south. The proposal does not include a lighting plan. In order to ensure that the outdoor lighting does not result in a glare/illumination problem on adjacent properties, the applicant should indicate that the proposed lighting is directed inward on the site. D. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; The proposal would not result in adverse impacts to the site. Stormwater treatment and detention facilities would have to be designed to meet City standards based on adopted sections of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. The landscape plan conflicts with the site plan in several areas of the site. The boat yard is shown as landscaped and the bioswale along the south property boundary is landscaped with upland plantings inappropriate to the hydrologic conditions of bioswales. The applicant should revise the landscape plan to be consistent with the anticipated uses on the site. The site plan indicates a garbage/refuse compactor area that is located at the northwest corner of the building, accessed off SW 34th Street. The plans do not indicate that the area would be screened by a fence or landscaping as required by the Code. In addition, garbage truck access may conflict with truck loading/unloading. The applicant should provide further detailed information that these trucks would not conflict if approaching and serving the site at the same time. E. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES; The proposal would improve an undeveloped site with a bulk retail use. The development is expected to conserve or enhance area-wide property values. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental.,v.rmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 10 of 14 F. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; The project site would be accessed via one driveway cut off East Valley Highway and the proposal shares an access drive with Home Base, located just south of the project site boundary. The applicant should submit a copy of an access easement. The north driveway cut is approximately 280 feet south of the intersection of East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street, and is separated from the shared access with Home Base by approximately 220 feet. The distances between the driveways is considered adequate to provide for safe and efficient vehicular circulation. The site plan application does not indicate the location of driveways of surrounding uses, both of existing uses across the East Valley Highway and across SW 34th Street. The applicant should indicate the location of the existing driveways of surrounding uses and, if practical, should align the proposed site driveways with existing driveways. There is a connection proposed off the shared access road with Home Base which would connect the parking areas between the uses. The connection is located only 35 feet from the access entrance to the East Valley Highway. Transportation staff has commented that this connection is too close to the road entry and could conflict with turning movements, and recommends either a 50 foot minimum distance from the entrance, elimination of the connection, or provision of stop signs facing the north/south direction. Truck loading enters the site off SW 34th Street, with truck wells leading to dock high doors along the north facade of the building. The code requires a minimum of 100 feet of clear maneuvering area (without backing into public right-of-way) from each door. It is not clear whether the proposal meets this requirement based on the level of detail from the set of plans submitted. The applicant should provide further evidence that the truck loading area complies with the code requirements. In order to foster pedestrian circulation, the site plan should be revised to provide a sidewalk connection between the sidewalk along East Valley Road and the building entry. G. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR; The proposed building is sufficiently setback from property boundaries and other structures to allow for adequate light and air circulation. H. MITIGATION OF NOISE, ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS; The proposed land use is generally consistent with existing and anticipated commercial uses in the area. It is not anticipated that the proposal would create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE; AND The proposed project site is adequately served by utilities and roads to accommodate the proposed land use. See.the Advisory Notes section of this report for detailed information concerning utilities and public services. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental__,_rmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 11 of 14 J. PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposed project would improve the vacant condition of the site, adding a commercial use which is compatible with the neighborhood. The development would likely assist in preventing the deterioration of the site and neighborhood. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained In the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter,the City now makes and enters the following: D. Findings 1) Request: The Applicant, Horton Dennis and Associates., has requested.Environmental Review& Site Plan Approval for development of G.I. Joe's. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, the State -Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 7. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Industrial 5) 'Zoning: The site plan as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Heavy industrial zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Burlington Northern. Industrial Park; East: South End Wrecking, Red & White Construction; South: Home Base; West: Farwest Steel Distribution Center. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) Specific Land Use (e.g. Site Plan Approval) issues were raised by various City departments. These issues are addressed in the body of this report. 3) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Industrial; and the Zoning designation of Heavy Industrial. SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental r;.:`rmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 12 of 14 F. Decision The Site Plan for GI Joe's File No. LUA-96-136, SA, ECF is approved, subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to meet the requirement for natural landscaping of 2% of the gross site area, per the Soil Conservation Service Environmental Mitigation Agreement. This requirement would be equal to 3,218 square feet for the subject site (160,905 s.f. X .02). The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to be consistent with the site plan. The landscape plan shows the proposed boat yard as landscaped and the bioswale along the south property boundary is landscaped with upland plantings inappropriate to the hydrologic conditions of bioswales. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall demonstrate that the outdoor lighting is directed inward on the site so as to avoid glare/illumination impacts onto adjacent properties. The lighting shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a detail or specification of fencing or screening materials around the garbage/refuse compactor area that is located at the northwest corner of the building. This shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. The applicant shall provide further detailed information and evidence that the truck loading area off SW 34th Street has sufficient clear maneuvering area (100 feet clear) without backing into the public right-of-way or interfering with garbage truck access. This shall be provided by the applicant and subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate the location of driveways of existing uses across East Valley Highway and across SW 34th Street. The applicant should indicate the location of the existing driveways of surrounding uses and, if practical, should align the proposed site driveways with existing driveways. Final approval of driveway locations shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. The applicant shall revise the access connection on the east portion of the site between the parking area and the shared access drive with Home Base. The applicant shall revise the drive connection to either have a 50 foot distance from the road entrance of East Valley Highway, to eliminate the east connection drive, or to provide stop..signs facing the north/south directions. Final approval of the revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. The site plan shall be revised to provide a direct sidewalk connection linking the sidewalk along East Valley Road and the building entry. This shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building.permits. 9. The proposed boat yard shall be improved with a paved surface. This shall be revised on the site plan, subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. SITERC.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental____Tmination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 13 of 14 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a copy of a legally recorded access easement to the site. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall either revise. the site plan to comply with the special setback standard in the Heavy Industrial zone or receive approval of a variance from the requirement. The special setback standard. requires a 20 foot setback including a 5 foot wide landscape strip and a solid 6 foot high barrier along the property line fronting the East Valley Highway, which is adjacent to the 'Employment Area-Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation. • DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION November 27, 1996 SIGNATURES c //J7-7C James C.Hanson,Zoning Administrator November 27, 1996 Michael D.Kattermann,Zoning Administrator November 27, 1996 TRANSMITTED this.27th day of November, 1996 to,the applicant and owner: G.I. Joe's do Martin Peterson 1127 Pine St., Suite 105 Seattle, WA. 98101 Horton Dennis and Associates do Barton Treece 320 Second Ave. S. Kirkland, WA. 98033 TRANSMITTED this 27th day of November, 1996 to the following: Jim Chandler,Building Official Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney Valley Daily News SITERC.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental L`.'amination&Administrative Land Use Action G.I.Joe's LUA-96-136,SA, ECF November 27, 1996 Page 14 of 14 Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration The decision on the requested administrative land use action is being made concurrently with the Environmental Determination. The 15 day comment period with concurrent 14 day appeal period for this project will end on December 17, 1996. The administrative land use and environmental decisions will become final if comments are not received and/or the decision/decisions is not appealed within 15 days of the date of the publication. An appeal of either or both decisions must be filed within the 14 day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before December 17, 1996. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen(14) days of publication. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8-11.B, which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m.on December 17, 1996. Any appeal must be accompanied by a$75.00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the court. SITERC.DOC z. CIT'_ rDF RENTON arIL Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 27, 1996 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on November 26, 1996: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED G. I. JOE'S LUA-96-136,SA,ECF Proposal for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 square feet. 226 parking spaces are proposed. The project would be accessed off East Valley,Highway and the parking area would be connected to the shared access road with the Home Base store to the south. Location: 3401 East Valley Highway. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on December 17, 1996. Following the end of the comment and appeal period,the City will finalize its Determination unless comments received require a re-evaluation. Appeal procedures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Reriton,,Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. If you have questions, please call me at (206) 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen ,/7/ Project Managers-- • cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal.Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AONCYLTR.DOC\ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer CIT` OF RENTON ; �' Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor __ Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 27, 1996 Mr. Barton Treece Horton, Dennis &Associates 320 Second Avenue South Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: G. I. Joe's Project No. LUA-96-136,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Treece: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on November 26, 1996, decided that your project may be issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: See enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required 15 day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The required 14 day appeal period will run concurrently with the comment period. The comment/appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on December 17, 1996. Following the end of the comment/appeal period, the City will finalize its Determination, unless comments received require a reevaluation. WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for implementation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measure established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. Appeal procedures and mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (206) 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Mr. Martin Peterson/G. I. Joe's DNSMLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50°r.recycled material,20 post consumer \ a ' NO-: r1 (-- ';) ,-.1 . . . . .. ..• . , . . . . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: 0.1.JOE'S 11i' PROJECT NUMBER: LUA•96436,SA,ECF Proposal for eonslroglon of s bulk retail store approximately 65,001 square feel.226 perking spaces are proposed. The project would be accessed off East Valley Highway and the perkIng area would be connected to the shared access road with the Home Base store to the south.Location:3401 East Valley I - Highway. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERC) HAS DETERMINED . THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE S- ENVIRONMENT. I AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. I n YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM._ THE CITY WILL NOT • ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. \I . In APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM.- • I M I ® APATMDMROATOS BYE00NA,OECM50EPM19E6. E ROMMN9ANR APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. I r. :L • _r_____ n H I ' .+1T7E ,_ i, Ail! .111-1*—:4 •4�� • wort . / -I IMF_ _. c FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification:;,';f<>'':• CERTIFICATION la Sa-n A , SDY , hereby certify that ' copies•of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the desctibed property on . . hCNV , iqC fn • . . Signed: 94LIv • i STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) . . . I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S>471.0V. J .0, ,�, . signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and vobink:t rc•aci•or(tlie uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument 'o~• ;r° c'9• '••Yt '7*•C,1. Dated: i 79 0 / ? �� . ..:: ' . , *.� Notary ublic in j d for the Stat . I smAplon • '•.._ o:s Nota (Print) ,PA-RG�RE7 ,:J 1/ ri,,LL 4- .My appointment expires: tw j9/'' NOTARY.DOC ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: G.I.JOE'S PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-96-136,SA,ECF Proposal for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 square feet. 226 parking spaces are proposed. The project would be accessed off East Valley Highway and the parking area would be connected to the shared access road with the Home Base store to the south. Location: 3401 East Valley Highway. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION UNTIL 5:00 PM, . THE CITY WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL UNTIL AFTER THIS DATE. APPEALS OF THIS DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PM, XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON DECEMBER 17,1996 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, DECEMBER 17, 1996. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. T — - • HET C SW.34711 STEEL a••>'Q'r. • U F. • Y • w. sr. F''g l . I' 1--I--i VALLEY Me IiJL S.W.41ST ST. • . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Pfe:se':.:.,:.. ;:;;; ,,.. a . ;include<the;pro�ectNUMBER,when:callin :for: ro er`file:tdentificat'"`` ,_``_,<:<<"' €: AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Elaine Kahns, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the following a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal project under the authority of the Renton newspaper ofgeneralpublication and is now and has been for more than six months Municipal Code. G.I. JOE'S prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language LUA96.136-SA,ECF continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Applicant requests environmental review for construction of a bulk retail store locs Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the tion: 3401 E. Valley Highway. State of Washington for King County. the 15 day comment and 14 day appeal The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County periods for this project will run concurrer'iy and end at 5:00 p.m. on December 17 Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers 1996.Appeal procedures and the mitigation during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a measures imposed by the City of Renton Notice of Environmental Determination Environmental Review Committee are avail- able at the Development Services Division, as published on: 12/2/96 Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$33.69 objections. Legal Number VN2334 Decemlishe2,d 11996. 2n the 3o34h County Journal 9g/llf autp .. Legal Clerk, South County Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this `f' ^day of \ ..t.e--- , 19 —( L fI `• Notary Public of the State of Washington ; * residing in Renton It '� ;.0 PUBOC" � = King County, Washington = OFWA�is NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. G.I. JOE'S LUA96-136,SA,ECF Applicant requests environmental review for construction of a bulk retail store Location: 3401 E. Valley Highway. The 15 day comment and 14 day appeal periods for this project will run concurrently and end at 5:00 p.m. on December 17, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Publication Date: DECEMBER 02, 1996 Account No. 51067 • dnsmpub.dot CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-136,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Horton Dennis &Associates, do Barton Treece PROJECT NAME: G. I. Joe's DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 square feet. 226 parking spaces are proposed. The project would be accessed off East Valley Highway and the parking area would be connected to the shared access road with the Home Base store to the south. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3401 East Valley Highway LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement .(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The 15 day comment period and the 14 day appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on December 17, 1996. Appeal procedures and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. PUBLICATION DATE: December 02, 1996 DATE OF DECISION: November 26, 1996 SIGNATURES: Gre 9 4Zfm rman minis�tr�r(r /GG D TE.^6 1( Departm f P ning/Building/Public Works / 0/has ain, A ministrator DATL Community Service Departmen e eeler, ire Chie DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-136,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Horton Dennis&Associates, c/o Barton Treece • PROJECT NAME: G. I. Joe's DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 square feet. 226 parking spaces are proposed. The project would be accessed off East Valley Highway and the parking area would be connected to the shared access road with the Home Base store to the south. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3401 East Valley Highway MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant will be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee at a rate of$0.52 per square foot of new construction. This fee is estimated at $28,616.12. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The Site Plan for G.L Joe's File No. LUA-96-136, SA, ECF is approved,subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to meet the requirement for natural landscaping of 2% of the gross site area, per the Soil Conservation Service Environmental Mitigation Agreement. This requirement would be equal to 3,218 square feet for the subject site (160,905 s.f. X .02). The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to be consistent with the site plan. The landscape plan shows the proposed boat yard as landscaped and the bioswale along the south property boundary is landscaped with upland plantings inappropriate to the hydrologic conditions of bioswales. The revised landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The applicant shall demonstrate that the outdoor lighting is directed inward on the site so as to avoid glare/illumination impacts onto adjacent properties. The lighting shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. The applicant shall provide a detail or specification of fencing or screening materials around the garbage/refuse compactor area that is located at the northwest corner of the building. This shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. G. I. Joe's LUA-96-136,SA,ECF MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS Page 2 of 2 5. The applicant shall provide further detailed information and evidence that the truck loading area off SW 34th Street has sufficient clear maneuvering area (100 feet clear) without backing into the public right-of-way or interfering with garbage truck access. This shall be provided by the applicant and subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate the location of driveways of existing uses across East Valley Highway and across SW 34th Street. The applicant should indicate the location of the existing driveways of surrounding uses and, if practical, should align the proposed site driveways with existing driveways. Final approval of driveway locations shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. The applicant shall revise the access connection on the east portion of the site between the parking area and the shared access drive with Home Base. The applicant shall revise the drive connection to either have a 50 foot distance from the road entrance of East Valley Highway, to eliminate the east connection drive, or to provide stop signs facing the north/south directions. Final approval of the revision shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. The site plan shall be revised to provide a direct sidewalk connection linking the sidewalk along East Valley Road and the building entry. This shall be subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The proposed boat yard shall be improved with a paved surface. This shall be revised on the site plan, subject to the approval of the Development Services Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide a copy of a legally recorded access easement to the site. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall either revise the site plan to comply with the special setback standard in the Heavy Industrial zone or receive approval of a variance from the requirement. The special setback standard requires a 20 foot setback including a 5 foot wide landscape strip and a solid 6 foot high barrier along the property line fronting the East Valley Highway, which is adjacent to the Employment Area- , Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation. = CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-96-136,SA,ECF APPLICANT: Horton Dennis &Associates, c/o Barton Treece PROJECT NAME: G. I. Joe's DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 square feet. 226 parking spaces are proposed. The project would be accessed off East Valley Highway and the parking area would be connected to the shared access road with the Home Base store to the south. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3401 East Valley Highway Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. PLAN REVIEW TRANSPORTATION: 1. Off-site improvements required include sidewalks the full length of property frontage to the roadways. Include pedestrian ramp at corner. 2. Show existing utilities on construction drawings. 3. G I Joe's driveway on SW 34th St.to be located opposite the driveway on the north side of SW 34th St. which is the Teutsch Partners Development. Show both driveways on drawings. 4. All Utility and Transportation drawings are to be in accordance with the City of Renton drafting standards. 5. On construction plans show existing driveways on the East side of E. Valley Rd. and align the proposed site driveway if practical with existing driveway. 6. Provide title sheet with civil plans with index and vicinity map and legal description. 7. Trucks will not be allowed backing or loading maneuvers in the public right-of-way. Sufficient space on site needs to be assured. 8. Proposed easterly access to Home base not recommended due to short 35-ft. throat distance at entrance to E. Valley Rd. Recommended throat distance for the combined use by Home Base and G.I. Joe's is a minimum of 50-ft. per the Transportation & Land Development manual. The access location increases potential turning movement conflict. An alternative,location should be consider or control at proposed location provided such as stop signs facing the north/south directions. 9. A sidewalk extension from E. Valley Rd. to building front should be considered. SEWER/WASTE WATER: 1. The sewer System Development Charge is $0.078 per square foot of gross area, but not less than $585.00. 2. If the project requires fire sprinkler system the floor drains are to be tightlined to the sanitary sewer system. 3. Plan and vertical profile required to City drafting standards. 4. Sewer clean out is required within 5-feet of the building and every 100-feet thereafter. G.I. Joe's LUA-96-136,SA,ECF ADVISORY NOTES (Continued) SEWER/WASTEWATER (CONTINUED) 5. Minimum slope is 2%to R/W. 6. A back flow prevention device is required when the floor elevation is below 22-ft.. 7. If the project produces fats, oils, or grease, an appropriate removal system shall be included on the conceptual utility plan. STORM /SURFACE WATER: 1. Address the Core requirements and Special requirements in the drainage report. State what will be done to meet the code or special requirement if applicable. 2. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5000 square feet are required to discharge into a biofiltration system. 3. If the proposed development exceeds the threshold of Special Requirement #5 on page 1.3.5-1 of the KCSWM then a properly designed wetpond must be provided. 4. If the proposed development exceeds the threshold for Special requirement #6 on page 1.3.6-1 of the KCSWM, then a coalescing plate, or equivalent, oil/water separator shall be provided. 5. Temporary Erosion /Sedimentation Control Plan required. 6. The System Development Charge is$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area, but not less than $385. 7. Survey datum to be per NAVD 1988 Datum 8. Vertical profile required. WATER: 1. A loop water system is necessary when required fire flow is over 2500 gpm. See Fire Departments required fire flow for site. 2 One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Fire flow requirements indicate four(4) hydrants will be required. 3. Water has a system Development Service Charge of $0.113 per square gross area, but not less than $850.00. 4. A conceptual utility plan for site plan is needed which includes main location, sizes, valve locations and hydrant locations. 5. A loop water system must be located within a 15-foot utility easement. 6. A proper back flow protection device is required for the fire sprinkler system, irrigation system. Show location and size of each. 7. The primary fire hydrant to be within 150 of the building structure , but not closer than 50 feet. The secondary hydrants are to be within 300 feet of building structure. GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,250 gpm. Four hydrants are required. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and 3 hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure.. G.I. Joe's LUA-96-136,SA,ECF ADVISORY NOTES(Continued) PARKS 1. Landscape improvements outside property line (within right-of-way) are the responsibility of the property owner. POLICE Police estimate 28.45 calls for service estimated annually, based on the size of the building. This area of Renton reports a large number of burglaries and thefts from construction sites. Police recommend security fencing and lighting. Tools and construction materials and equipment will need to be locked up when not in use. Applicant should consider use of a private security patrol or guard service to monitor the site after hours and on weekends. Police recommend a monitored alarm system and electronic price tags to help catch shoplifters. AIRPORT The proposed structure is located southwest of the airport and outside of the 14,000 foot Airport Environment area. the requirements of the Notice to Applicants, pertaining to Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77, should be adhered to. City, Fenton Department of Planning/Building/Ft,._ _,)Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ptw.pCA- COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-136,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 01, 1996 APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: G. I. JOES WORK ORDER NO: 78153 LOCATION: SW corner of East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street SITE AREA: 3.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 55,031 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 55,031 Sq. Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 Sq.Ft. Parking spaces are proposed at 226. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth 1C Housing Air W Aesthetics Water YO LighVGlare 1C Plants 10 Recreation C Land/Shoreline Use F Utilities X Animals it Transportation X Environmental Health 16 Public Services X Energy/ IC Historic/Cultural A Natural Resources Preservation , Airport Environment IC 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet P The proposed structure is located southwest of the airport and outside of the 14,000 foot Airport Environmei!taarea. The requirements of the Notice to Applicants, pertaining to Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77, should be adhered to. No information about ground 'elevation or building elevations/heights were included in the application. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this •.lication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas wher: .•.itional inform- ,n is needed to property assess this proposal. • t 3 \ketk.. k5 e tnco Signat Director or Authorized -epresentative Date DEVAP- ••of Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Construction Services Comments Due:November 15, 1996 Application No.: LUA-96-136, SA,ECF Date Circulated:November 1, 1996 Applicant: Horton Dennis &Associates Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Title: G.I. Joes Work Order No: 78153 Location: SW Corner of East Valley Highway&SW 34th St. Site Area: Building Area(gross):, A. Environmental Impact(e.g. Non-Code) Comments Probable Minor Impacts: Earth B. Policy-Related Comments Soil report shall be adhered to. C. Code-Related Comments 1. Structural fill permit required. Soils engineer to perform special inspections.. 2. Soils engineer to approve all footing excavations prior to placement of concrete. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date grnfldr City .!enton Department of Planning/Building/Fq .- Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Cv,.S'\yucc Sevi(cQ COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-136,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 01, 1996 �r).,. APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN =' �`4ay PROJECT TITLE: G. I. JOES WORK ORDER NO: 78153 LOCATION: SW corner of East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street 444, . c2 499R rd� SITE AREA: 3.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 55,031 Sq.Ft. 0/fr. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 55,031 Sq.'01C)j , SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 Sq.Ft. Parking spaces are proposed at 226. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Map? Information Imi;),s Impacts • Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare , Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistorlclCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000'Feet 14,000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS��I LS R/A6,j C f l/yr' , n v {Afl / {l J) 'Q C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS I 6 1R[LTout rIW gag fi) 11 - jO1LS -to f fActi m 5Ptak/ M PEctlrAAE 1 2, SOILS Eirokkk, oth / LPI LII ietti) We hay ' e this ap i ation with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where i I s e e to properly assess this proposal. _ !1 6 Signa re of Director or u horized Representative Date DEVA .DOC Rev.10/93 r City f_� ._`nton Department of Planning/Building/Pr., ;Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r\ PrjertAhvv COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-136,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 01, 1996 APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: G. I.JOES WORK ORDER NO: 78153 LOCATION: SW corner of East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street SITE AREA: 3.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 55,031 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 55,031 Sq. Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 Sq.Ft. Parking spaces are proposed at 226. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More ' Environment Minor Major. Information Environment 'Minor . Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts - Impacts Necessary Earth Housing • Air . Aesthetics . Water . Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historlc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet AL ilJ ar 1744 V4C �p IZ) B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /VA . R R°` �ON r. G_. �;---P NOV 0 4.1996 • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS o • 6 2G arladeG� a44ot"� sVect We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have-identified areas of probable Impact or areas where a•ditto.al information is needed to prop;'i;•assess this proposal. '7' . l ( 9t . d Signatu ••IIPDirector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP. • Rev.10i93 • 1�y CITY OF RENTON c) ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • Fe MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 1995 TO: Jennifer Henning, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Preliminary Comments for G. I. Joe's 1. Preliminary fire flow required is 3,250 gpm. Four hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and three hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. Fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of $0.52 per square foot of building: • 57,738 square feet x $0.52 = $30,023.76. This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. Access for Fire Department apparatus is acceptable as shown. CT:js GIJoes F a City',_,,'enton Department of Planning/Building/P „_-.Works ENVIRONMENTAL & D,EVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENTSwrfat,e to te.u.l tpAMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-136,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 01, 1996 ,,r3, APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: PETERROSEN PROJECT TITLE: G. I. JOES WORK ORDER NO: 78153 j 1°11" R-r (,2 yl .v LOCATION: SW-corner of East Valley Highway and SW,34th'Street ��°m<� v Zech SITE AREA: 3.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 55,031• Sq.Ft. E,•,.BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 55,031Sq,.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:. Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for oonstruc on of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 Sq.Ft. Parking spaces are proposed at 226. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LlghVGlare _ Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS t.„ TOY y'eviPeP, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Zo// /� /7,. " Signature of Director or Authorized Represents a Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS BY Clinton Morgan GIJoe's SW 34th St.Between Lind Ave. Sw&E.Valley Rd. November 12, 1996 SEWER/WASTE WATER: 1. The sewer System Development Charge is $0.078 per square foot of gross area, but not less than $585.00. 2. If the project requires fire sprinkler system the floor drains are to be tightlined to the sanitary sewer system. 3. Plan and vertical profile required to City drafting standards. 4. Sewer clean out is required within 5-feet of the building and every 100-feet thereafter. 5. Minimum slope is 2%to R/W. 6. A back flow prevention device is required when the floor elevation is below 22-ft.. 7. Will the project produce fats, oils, or grease? If so, an appropriate removal system shall be included on the conceptual utility plan. STORM/SURFACE WATER: 1. Address the Core requirements and Special requirements in the drainage report. State what will be done to meet the code or special requirement if applicable. If wet lands are required state how that will be met. 2. Parking areas or driving surfaces subject to vehicular use of greater than 5000 square feet are required to discharge into a biofiltration system. 3. If the proposed development exceeds the threshold of Special Requirement#5 on page 1.3.5-1 of the KCSWM then a properly designed wetpond must be provided. 4. If the proposed development exceeds the threshold for Special requirement#6 on page 1.3.6-1 of the KCSWM,then a coalescing plate,or equivalent,oil/water separator shall be provided. 5. Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan required. 6. The System Development Charge is$0.129 per square foot of new impervious area,but not less than $385. 7. Survey datum to be per NAVD 1988 Datum 8. Vertical profile required. 96cm231 96CM231.DOC1 r, Y • City r. ..nton Department of Planning/Building/Pt _,,.Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPM-ENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: izitaty a¢ue.W^ COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-136,SA,ECF ,. DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 01, 1996, APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN ��riZ6rrr rt ,ski, '44 PROJECT TITLE: G. I. JOES WORK ORDER NO: 78153 1I ?v LOCATION: SW corner of.East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street ' ikvG R SITE AREA: 3.7 ACRES • BUILDING AREA(gross): 55,031 Sq.Ft BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 55,031 St '®F ,p • SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 Sq.Ft. Parking spaces are proposed at 226.•The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable. More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major • Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts - Impacts Necessary Earth Housing . . . Air • ' Aesthetics Water ( Light/Glare V Plants Recreation - Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals • Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural - Natural Resources. Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Sew cb- a C 14, orb C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional'dorm tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. , i /p/q. 6 Signature of Director or Authorized Represen ve Date • DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 f . _ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES EIS REVIEW COMMENTS BY Clinton Morgan GIJoe's SW 34th St.Between Lind Ave. Sw&E. Valley Rd. November 12, 1996 WATER: 1. A loop water system is necessary when required fire flow is over 2500 gpm. See Fire Departments required fire flow for site. 2 One fire hydrant is required for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow. Fire flow requirements indicate four(4)hydrants will be required. 3. Water has a system Development Service Charge of$0.113 per square gross area, but not less than$850.00. 4. A conceptual utility plan for site plan is needed which includes main location, sizes, valve locations and hydrant locations. 5. A loop water system must be located within a 15-foot utility easement. 6. A proper back flow protection device is required for the fire sprinkler system, irrigation system. Show location and size of each. 7. The primary fire hydrant to be within 150 of the building structure,but not closer than 50 feet. The secondary hydrants are to be within 300 feet of building structure. 96cm233 96CM233.DOC\ City enton Department of Planning/Building/f - Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENTf Sea--`ank(Ai COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 15,.1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-136,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 01, 1996 ,,,, APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES •PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN ; �Q98, on PROJECT TITLE: G. I. JOES WORK ORDER NO: 78153 LOCATION: SW corner of East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street 4°4..6,,, 4990 SITE AREA: 3.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 55,031 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 55,031 Sq. F .f SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan.Approvalj for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 Sq.Ft. Parking spaces are proposed at 226. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary .Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LancVShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ - Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • aka ch ems . - revfi , B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additi al information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1/ //-3/7k Signature of Director or Authorized Representativ Date ' DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10193 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTS BY Clinton Morgan G I Joe's SW 34th St. Between Lind Ave. Sw & E. Valley Rd. November, 1996 TRANSPORTATION: 1. Off-site improvements required is sidewalks the full length of property frontage to the roadways. Include pedestrian ramp at corner. 2. Show existing utilities on construction drawings. 3. G I Joe's driveway on SW 34th St. to be located opposite the driveway on the north side of SW 34th St. which is the Teutsch Partners Development. Show both driveways on drawings. 4. The Transportation Mitigation Charge is $75.00 per trip generated as estimated from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Transportation mitigation fee is $28,928.25. See attachment for calculations. 5. All Utility and Transportation drawings are to be in accordance with the City of Renton drafting standards. 6. On construction plans show existing driveways on the East side of E. Valley Rd. and align the proposed site driveway if practical with existing driveway. 8. Provide title sheet with civil plans with index and vicinity map and legal description. 9. Trucks will not be allowed backing or loading maneuvers in the public right-of-way. Sufficient space on site needs to be assured. 10. Proposed easterly access to Home base not recommended due to short 35-ft. throat distance at entrance to E. Valley Rd. Recommended throat distance for the combined use by Home Base and G.I. Joe's is a minimum of 50- ft. per the Transportation & Land Development manual. The access location increases potential turning movement conflicts, An alternative location should be consider or control at proposed location provided such as stop signs facing the north /south directions. 11 At sidewalk extension from E. Valley Rd. to building front should be considered. 96CM234 6s.(rY + 411461_a + ) -`m.c;.. .:.7„�,✓�%yi �xvwry,YY?»pC?+,??Xyc,}s;uoa,CGur!i�^ve.:o�??�A?�`?r azs.;r. Project Name oe.s Project Address 3 4/0/ E, V4 LLe y !-/W y Contact Person 11-4 Ale-TIN pETEr25orJ Address l l Z7 P Imo cr1 So rTe. 10,5 Sc 4TTW yg /O Phone Number (20(0) bZ8 -Q.4(0O Permit Number Project Description 55,0-0() SF Buell 12EIL. 5702.0 Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential ["ITE Trip Generation Manual (815) IT Retail 0 Traffic Study D►sc014w1 Side ❑ Non-retail 0 Other • Calculation: Rice,6 7043 trvs lo00* / 55,0O0 ) (70. 13) = 3857, /5 dai4 tvi, i L. room $ 75 tail 'Zvi 15 j (75 2S2) `(Z $ , Z5 Transportation Mitigation Fee: 2 c1 Z g - 2 Calculated b .r % ,�,t.v� '� �i2 �✓ Date: ;%• 4/'y; ��( c ✓� 1 l� c � Account Number: /05 .599.a°• 3180. 70. CO. 2O(0 Date of Payment Cit, Renton Department of Planning/Building/ ui,ic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Phitips. COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-136,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 01, 1996 APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS &ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: G. I. JOES WORK ORDER NO: 78153 LOCATION: SW corner of East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street SITE AREA: 3.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 55,031 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 55,031 Sq. Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 Sq.Ft. Parking spaces are proposed at 226. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histortc/Cuitural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet [7Ae,14_,C,VZ,( /276 /e/r24eZ, -66- igr) B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Xr....) 74•51676:se. e),Ce7-7/?-7 1"7--&-) C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS nn We have reviewed this application with particular attention to th• e areas'n which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this pry•osal. 7/�021/11 7c%6 a l(5.�7� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e DEVAPP.DOC V Rev.10183 City, enton Department of Planning/Building/F. ti Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: h61tcc_ COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 15, 1996 APPLICATION NO: LUA-96-136,SA,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: NOVEMBER 01, 1996 APPLICANT: HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: G. I.JOES WORK ORDER NO: 78153 LOCATION: SW corner of East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street SITE AREA: 3.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA(gross): 55,031 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(new expansion gross): 55,031 Sq. Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Environmental Review and Administrative Land Use Action[Site Plan Approval]for construction of a bulk retail store approximately 55,031 Sq.Ft. Parking spaces are proposed at 226. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Aasorellne Use UtilitiesY Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ear is cety seivt ce, eScOinoi4ck anruzit , bCcq_ t of) . 'tom ldt;hc� QJ c �rntn (ePoriS o� I f�; 1LUTI� 01-- burg l curi- 4/h1ff 5 ConStru eRO n Si- R-eco m rw x cA secu,n'-b(A P Ti I Q- Ct tkrIci\ . rc lS burt& cOs1S-hU(,h0 n mo 11°I a..2s f. .u nun, u 1 RDA -RD be- up whin not i [.�� �c LVC 1S UM l 1 (Lid YikaAA, GU !.G -OD 11- °CAS - bars Nor ouN u I ows hk p t9revcri - Dut rg i . 7ovEs e u_i �u. P �t- s h 2, ix Sericc6 try) ��c��cl2c� , n � � API cant cs1oui_ k 1L3o C SI oUn A u.% - c pnva0 secu.r i pa,---01 or quala . or ce_ +0 neon k-o \nou.(S c- on Uu c-e(c-e „�hL lo P Q�T s s 4413h.0 r (Y101\ 4e c W& .e,u o r\k c L-1) ftt p mach Shop We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. LeAdhlt V-te I I—)—q Signature of Director Aut sized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC i Rev.10r83 . . .....:.. ,. . . . . . „•„. . . . . . . . . . . , . . • - • • •-,- .. ::•,:,....1,.,:::-.•.!_;•,--,...-',;:-.:-,,fr,-.:;-,•:••,:".1.,:• i -.••: i:,, '7.•''': ''..• • ••-• - - • "• ':*:• '-•; • ' • :... - •'. -. --,.. i '. . •• . . . . PROPERTY SERVICES FEE RE VIE 96- •--•6.7,3 • • • . : . . , .. - • ,.•I -,,,DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . I :-•. • ...El PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP • . •-•-.- , ' : -, :•...E1 -!:..ENV1RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET - ..-..--. 1:1 • . .'' .. ' •'' ... . OTIR APPLICANT: • 714,7" ' /vEi\rr,I--/CD • • RECEIVED FROM (i'.//4 //42.4 4 JOB ADDRESS: . -. -71-/O/ /.---71,c-7- 1)4-ctry R70./5-0. — :••-• — - • wo# • . (date) NATURE OF WORK:" (;*, 7—;-../07.--.‘c ,F-77:9,4. • 07,7-ii-77- ' GREEN# . . ... . .. . ,, ..... _ . . O -SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED • . NEED MORE INFORMATION: • 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION . 23 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED . --• 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP • O .NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES . '.. • •. , . 0 , .FRONT FOOTAGE - ::•. 0 OTHER CI ';VESTED .• "--;.,..":" -"...-. -'• -.. 0 •NOT VESTED .", ., .': '. • ' , ' . " ' ', .. 0 - This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# ,"• ' '- - dated ' . " • ' - " . " • . _ . , . . .. _ . ,. . ".. , ."..':-;%,..-„,,:::....-.•, , •,„;".,".:,"-..'-'• . " •",,..-2.e,.-..i",',--':::--..••''•.1 .:-- -.'"'-; - ', ::,...,.', 0 ...PARENT PID#,(subject to change)_ .. • . - SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# ' /2534,4',' 01452 • ' --• .• . ..- '. '"-:.•".".,ci -.King Co.Tax Acct#(new) .-; . --. ' • . • • . . •It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon . . development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,'street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. .: ••.. . • ..• . •• • - .• . . . •• . •• • . • -. . . • •Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit • application • ,• , .,. The following quoted lids do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. • ••• : •• •'•• . • • • . -. ' . . . . ... .. SPECIALASSESSMENT•,:',**-;-;::-....-'..-:. ••*:.•:•,..;--..: . *.2 DISTRICT .- PARCEL '' ..--METHOD OF :,,' 'ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT -• — ...- DISTRICTS '.•••Ji::-,:•'1.!..i:..-•,;,•:••,-.,,,-:..-:-.•e- :•.-‘:-.•;-..,•:,.,. ;.•,...%..,-..", • ...,:, NO..:".,.':-• ,-...N0.-,-,ei c•-.:•:•ASSESSMENT * • - :.:*:,UNITS ••',', .OR FEE ---: LteciimeeAgreiment(pi,t).WATER ,:'.''-*:-.:'..-: .• .-.. •-• 'r... '-.'-•,*.•-'.:v",.': .--••':.•• -:•••••':. ,- -..-•-•'.:-..' '....r. •* ,.. - - -..•''.•:.',',..,.'-...-.* :- -• • .c'Lateconier Agreeiiiiiit(pvt)WASTEWATER ,.'H••!:• -•'-;.".1•••.*:.--d7.-..c-,:.:•.:'• -.*--....--1'.''.-•.•••.,;*•:',*, -;.. :*:-•'.**:'.*.:,,..:!.-1..c...:*:,--..::-•-•:.-....* , ••••••*.--'•-•.*::.•, :::::•-., •.•-• *. - •.•• .--,:.,-•'.,..:* ... •-c Latecomer Agreement(pit)OTHER"';':,•:•`:.•••••,-.,f---:'::::,-,-•-• '',.•• .:•."-:.; ••.'".'i.".' .:*:;..'..*•fc''/: -. '-•;';'4,*s.''',.*: .•*2-•..' ...-' . '.....-•:;...::-•::•;--!':. -*".'.':.1 .- .--0.-•:-7:*.-. , _,,,,,„7,,,..,..,:::-:,:,,,,,,c-......7;y:.:,.,::: :..L-_-,.•.,c_.:.::,12?;,414, ,,.',.,,,.*- •:',f,:.-t.J..i.„-...*..•••. .,:-.1..:*-..,..- . ,•2:,•:::::;:'..-'i":':'. ': •":,-:""'"i's 5:;..:f,•."1-;::. 5',',',7:1.::'-''' ,•':•••"-"Y.11FIY•.•"•:;i:.- :';:.:',i.-,•::.-•„7....."7'.•o's .. r..-. :.:•...-------77-' Special Assessment District/WATER•,..,..,-,..4.:,N. ••• ••,•;,-:.,•-•-•••,••••••• •;- .;,,..,...„!,- ,.. -.-,,,•.,-.1,,---!,,,••-•=.•'' ,., ,1•-i• • -• ,•-,• • ,,-. .;;;:.--!...::1-4,,•'—'-,- .' •"•'•';''•;''''';'-''.1'47.*•;-'1 ,1'1.i.XZ'''''''';€''il-1:ii1T.A.---.11;i1:•11.1ii.r`a411r;'i1P:-:'';`•,;41,i,;;,.i.r..; :,:;•";,',;.' ''':.14:::,..:f,'''' '''`i•-•'1_',,,'•:.:•7 ••••,„.5:;,,,:t.;•,..c•;,,,,,”_..:: •Jvicl,...,;,,,.,,.;.,ri,-,._,,:,,sov.,ist.!.:1•,,f).,:•3:-,.. .:,:•-•...-,,,•,, ,,i;;,::,;::.,i'::::.,,i,;.7:-L:L,f,, ."-t-:' ••,...,i....•'.,,- -,•••• ••• - •'""•-r-.::••:,74-'.:!.,,F:.;:."-,tk.;;g:Lii-, ::•kat-z,-4:7A:.--,•,i,:,,•,+..,-..,.,;;';:`..-:j..-•••.!3.•-z--.1:-,3y,..1,..;:.., ,,•., ..,„ ... , ,, ,.,,„,,:..., ,... .,, .2,,, , .,....,..,,,..,t,,, ,,•,. ,..., -„::, - •, ,„ ,, •.:,::• ....; ..".5'-il-Stoetial Asse:ssinenf District/VVASTEWATER...-c2c;,,''',..:-:: ...'.zi5z*,':-.:C;4,,,°.:3,-.,•,:-i*;.;.fi.:;i•e.i• t.4,-,,,,.•,74:3,....g,.,-,:..-_,.. ,.,:„:„....,,,,_tr„y,,,y,:,-,.1,?;.•-z,::.a.,•,.4-,.-,,,,c.r.4,7,,,q;,.,5; 4,,,,,,,,,..;:,,,,.„),1,,,,,-,,,,,,a.,,A,,.... 4 .-,•-- ,,.1,--..-c,:7....:,,,..: •?,' 14iiiii'Uie'7A-ii:e'eiiiIiiilMETROj-lq,53..;i:g.P:V)Itig . .-.? , _,-,-;?-';','.ci--,3:Q; 1-E.'g.---;!:(. .11-7,-.--.g.-; i.,,lff§..f'4. '4;,,(Z.-.. ,Ag.. l';',`...4.1.,*OtT,-fi3-.,:i'ri;t.fF-,2--'--....-..,::-. .e..:;,..,.,::::: ...-... ----:fl'a-Calltiiiiiiiiiii Diiiiiet'f:,,..2:':( 15:-... .icktY..i7-..i?'..-; -3o2:!,r.wiy.- J'?--:.,---.;•; :.; ,. .i:',-4 '...,'",'74•T:.?'.Q.•: .'.2i1:';-- :•. .E.:!.. .•.r7-,F.'•7;:;..:. •-5E !',' •.* '-:----... .•.•,..... .. ..-,'7,, c...) .. !,-.."-..•Traffic',Benefit Zciii6i';:;,':•-','-'•'S-4:2 :Y`--f•-•.ctf.1,F-!•cf;:•Z _:.",i';‘`;•. ';`,c2:* $75.00 PER TRIP,•CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION'',":*!'7.•:.:...-..•:,•:..- ...--..,.• . '.•5:••-;':',.. . ..' ;FUTURE OBLIGATIONS: -.!..;:,gc,q%5 :c.•••, ...... -:. :,:...:•:.'.-.1 ,:!?,j.,:f4,5 -•:,:•„..!)_:,.. -e..-4....-...;::::: ....:,..;:;.:,,,:-,-.,,,-... . .ri--,•-)....4,;. , ;:i. !_ .,..,....,,,-..„t,:.;...:..5,:yr".2-i.,:5; , ,,,.. CHARGE-INTATEI:t ..?::;';'( V ,,,r..;:;:,',:-:• ,..;.1;;',: ',5 it OF pmics/...,:' .....:._".i•.3,.,:;:- ',:Spc,FEE,.-.,...., _ 1:1:-.Ild Prey. -!'....?.1i Zin'ii:iinily'sli.ci(Lia:E1/61iiliOn)'-.--'s;41 .,,yNeiT-eifpci ‘.:'•...,:i;,,-.•,'..-.':::.- f, •ki:..-Fid. .,:::,.•: :-::.,.:. -:•-•:•:-..'•;,,: ;;-,,.:,,,,,•:••••• ; ..•••-•-:::::::,•.;:,.-- ;.:Single.faiiiili:.i6idential$850/unit i:..::'..-'k'-'-'-''...''. .,.'..::''',.-.':'..-....2':::,,Z:.i."2-:,':;;.-.:;;,.!:::-•--.-.-.,-'i...... ..7i-'17.-:;-:: ,...,..:......... ,. __,•••:.,... . 7.,.-..„...,• .!.. ,_....:., . . . -,. . .. ..,,..,. • .'Mobile Imiine.iiiiiellinkiiiiii$680/Unifin'tiark'....:::: :'.-.•;•;,•::.:•, !!,..'::-;. ..:•'`. f....-`....).c,- ..,....`-';•.:•`'.:::-.";. .". :•:' ,..",...; :-..'..:•- 1,...,:- '. :, • T.' - ':.."-•,':.-''...' , . . . ....„ . ... . -,:Aliaiiiiient; Cando.:$510/Unit'not in CD.or.COltion6"x.''';.'..:.,';'. :-::, ,",•:-.= •".--- . 1:e.:!•-.i:!..: :-.....•':-..".-. -•:-:::'..:,,.••••....--:...,-'.,°''. •.;•:'•..'V-.-- ''.• . .'..-.. ;•...':CoriiiiiiViiial/Itiiitisifial $6:113 gii:-.'ft.-of,,iiibtiertyliilii.'ili;41'$ 5-0.60j'ii.r. .1i.:V.'•,9' :/ .. ..7.-f;.;:.'!:.'?..&:',,,',.',',Et''''p;'..-;')'2, -l':,.20.- 2,..is',8C).:.:--,: Boeing,1)y.Special'Aiiie441t/Ppdii)=-1M.0-,FP!(!g*St1:5 15.ft fieOtietetI2;iod GPM itiresliO1* •••:1-fi. --:;,"'..*ct'•'''':,-, .*::"'..s.:_•..•••.-,..';-:'17-' 'i..; -f;.:?.; .. SYSTEN,PE:YPCiPPME, l'..T,;;C:44 .4PK.,;:-)5r.ATFWATP3..:,- ;',-:-g.74,32.; ,,:-.,:i's•:'::: 4,-,--•-:: ??, . ,:,, -Itl..i'd Pre'il.:-',."'.... ti'..iri*ii-7ifaily_Pii'(Lid EieeMfitlii)'lit...-B1::44e4i"pi--,''',.:.:'.-.?.:.i,-,•"‘, ., :".:-;'....' ;.";;.:;:;1-•'-'...; . ."..';:,';:-.:-.....•,',.: .':'•-. '.. •V. -.I.:Sinkle family residential dwelling unit$585/umt x ..-..--,-.•;.-:_,•.-' .-.............. ....- ,...,„ -.: ;-:..--. :.--:-_:. '.., , --..-.,. . :- ...•- ...• . • .. ' .-'• ••-: ''..--. • 5,',...7.Mobile'himifedviTellint:iiiiit'$468/unit)4-••••,;.f:',-.;i:::.,-..f. .".4,-:. ...i.i?. ..:"- -,:"-•ft,?..!›., ,..---;';''.•,..,...'.4,...-- -.',.:.'... ,:j,'...'. '.-;:;:.•.';',. ..:-:-.1'r::•:::-...--,-,::.-':::•-:•::-. i'. ".•;,'',-...-.1j.z.-'':-.••'`..;.:.-:--...•...;' •, ' '-'' ''-:......•::: -.- ...Atinrein,r•tiiiii16.$350/iiiit ii6t"in'CD or COR idneiii'.,' .h.:-''' . :'..' '•••... ;:"':::::'.-'..:-: ''--- : . .- . •... .-.', ..-.-::•'''..: . ..-....CoMineielal/Iiidtiitiial;4 0:078/s ciAt of..,iiiii peity.(not less ihin-$585.00),J g&•;.-:.:.1:7Y.47.Y.R.5----.....,•_. ,,Jz...r..'07/,5--'-,.-,a 2,c':_: :•'..;;',.. REDEvELOPM:ENT;CkEDnNeiVs.47,-:,obi*Fbiii)INFlihir-!',X•Abeiie Fees :.'.';::.3i-`:.....:',Yi'.7.',1'/.j '...;...-1:-'-:;-;'::'-'7.1'''.i.'.';.:::::::::..i.'::... ,.-.-:: -'---,..• ...J ' §YSTEKpMLOPA*NTXAIARQE:'e.,Sy.U_gF_,g'_GBW;_A:IB_R- - gi:i'F-.:i' 'I$'•R::'A ;;:-.-•;-'.4::, ::'-fi.ei..,6..`:•- a , ., .,,:...-i..-lf.k.:•'.''.;-.<' ,..::',',6r-':"'.:;•:: b3!,j;afa4:V;Ri--tfk.g'Arairk%Etaittiaijillij:'.1::),a2f;,i,V4i•:Ti5.'cf.tgb..q;T.:;,: .:;•'•: •.M. fig.,:.5.-- :: 4g ;•-..,•*,iel:1::,v.,, ,...-..,,,,',,,'"i: •.,.. -:.i.-: • -.,,.., ,4.,, ,.,...ZZ:f=.4;4.:;`,•,.'!.. '--, ,_,...;,1.'...%,;::.,2,,-.--,:, .'dSiiiii'''fiiiitlilliegiae,iitifilliiiifiiiigilleliiiiiii-ltii4iiiiiilliiiii:!.$j.8Siti_iiifie%'S:f2La :',....4.''''''';?•i•: ..::'..0::7', -",:.:4-f:-..:_:-; •":24...,,4: , ,•-,,,......... • --`,"•'-iAlt4iikeiliiailAwiitiisti:;"-iVii:cf47614igifi4jili4iiiiiig%PeTkiriiiiifitki7-,;:i?',4. 4- CgiiiM,T: Oi:V. 1,frfi'q.54.7VV•ky, ..'-'...,; ---'2'.:i3`-'.i ......:,-;.:,1,-).;,.-:.:,:::...i.•e:,s9-F.:.,:::,f-i,t;.v•,..:,..,,jr:.:.,-,p.,:,*.:,.g,,,,,;orfxp,;wr_k,%,.,,,,:,;t,,,,,,.,tf,,,, ,c..y.;,-, .,..--/cie;.; :c--'R I-1&y,,.., ,-.,A,,, -3,,-.1...-To.,.„=.4,"05,:. .`.. ;,,, •,,,;,. 74.-..,,q-F,1„,,...., ., -..1,.,:•4.(not less lhatiT. :,;-1) IJ •ZZ):;;;.:7:15.:_.:::;334'S.fl.,,.,-'4%';;410.t7i-,',1.::::,'-'i,i;::4?:EF".:t?,.7.,..',AllY;;-1>';'..Z"11?:.414%.:':,..t.'41::az:1* ,'.';,..".r.f,tr,"rZ.).-V,. ": .1.; '-' ',: ' V2.:!',,..-,;,.::-... .7,.r,--- 7-'-.'.L-'1.•?:,-...,•;. --'-'•.--'-"'-.:,:''‘,',-."•'.,;,-1;,:.:.::::-.';-,....Zi.::.:•::.,.:';:.;;,'y,:':.1":.:::'''..::;-1:;':',...•,,C:'t,-.4,-,.,g,,-:,•;i;'.;.;:,•,i1',A:.$?I.Fij*0Y-..,'7...i.;p4Ce,, ',.-‘_0`7.,"ci:;,;;-,,21"'w,,I1P*V,;M.,Po7,i4Z•p71:4a'.yfq1,wg':e9f1abiF4.:t,•k_.'::,:.).,,,:,,;;1f:.•..' 3 -,•,.,.;;'•',-.,''C,:_.''.c,V-ti:e,"-4gric.g',.e.:Tt.,.0.E1,1.5i4Rrt.Y..,gISAtW,::rIYI• :.,T1iZilgE,...i.i.'c.:..Mf14.,I1,tttsA.2e...i..=?,'•tyT1'lA,--.t,.•Ot‘,r-T'4al'fiAI ,-.3.,16:7.Pi.tsis4rki9'IaT',k,CsA'.-''4.:i.;2.5":5'./;1":,.:.`_;k,-.Z:.•:=,';"1-5.,-4--4,="A7-?.cZ,"...;li,„,t';7'••,p.-'d'7:t''..;7;4,,;"z_..,V:0cA N , ? 0)ki , - e?AO : 'QaWk4 !1F Sig- 0virtYW - ADATEf6j " . ATiR 11fi1616eCii)0811Y,ii4ihiiJiilLID6ViE4eiblofefi5606i§itilii9;W' he8kViiltemODa&ia /ul,ialdsfilifP 'J---7• ..i;=•,-4.,4__ 1175(t0it)tzOtagOfigure§,u$etiar01tikehfrclfhecing.CpgiNTAsses4prism,i;ApcJare.4pprpmmat19ny I• .•g-,k-,,",,;::7•;_::1iV:527g,•,*•f!!•'1.•,:':.%,'4,"C,,-,,c.,.';',.,c‘-`5k3.:71;,.N6::Y,.;)-'"x.'',:-;.l,1•„:,5..-4:;.'c' :.:,„-..,,-,-v-,--,-,,,,,-'•;,__=.;.',.:•LL:.?',,T,i....,..,-,,...p, ' -' )7•••••,',„:,,:74,-4,.t-t•rii..4,1.404,;,-;,1,,E,;‘,.-.1k:,,,,e?..t.'2!..,21,,yes-.43.=N,,Ii-, „ , ,e.,,,•,,_-1;,-..,..,-„ ,-,..-:,,-;•::"--4% '7.4,,.--'4;.--5:,:ii>j-.:,4;,.'1_;-'4"iikyt,ltili.,i'kuket.rez.'-;.!:•.-.2.'.c, c;(ten,'Plaeffe,PPPPilgb.;:?4.gr.Y...-*CPY; c4411Y',4,1i,49...P5/91..!..02;719,.s...11P,P`i'.fT,,tVil-,4P.F.,174,tf-P-4.PillP. t.°,4:!•°4i :4:fr;'nrr'''Ile:`'''' * i0.e':Vq4''-i'3- 'fr'-;;''P'7,?'.'.*:'5ff' *L-iif-,'Wee*** . 1-&-2T .e-, '',.4. : `#-.'.' :'.:- : --,:' g ;ii5-4ii:P:7--,,:,;%-4',)- #7-..7-:-4,-ge:elD.;-. -„ ..,;,.,:i:,!!:4..,-,.-.,,-..,,,,:,..,-f.:-..,.---.. ,', :,,:..':. ,::---,'-.7,1e-_-,‘..f.- ',....:7''' .:'2.,'•:;-_-'::•_---.-:::L'Z':', .%:...1,;=.'.._eiirl-';''_?;.-;::.-',-.•;,:--7- 40 f-y• '. '�ti t."'. • . 14414 a.46- 1". ViiµJ 'i'Rv'BY:'ktii.;Ki •:i. NOTICE OF PROPOSED ItiLVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. Thefollowing briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. S"R^a:.. ''s'I':' : 1::i�:.,:-.;. ;'i. :-)F --,_.it. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: G. I. JOE'S/LUA-96-136,SA,ECF ?` 1 DESCRIPTION: .. The applicant is requesting:.Administrative Site Plan.:.Approval- (SA), and Pnvironmental Checklist Review(ECF)to construct a bulk retail store building approximately 55,031 Square Feet in size • arking is proposed for 226 vehicles. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off-East-Valley Road. ' GENERAL LOCATION: SW corner of East Valley Highway and SW:34th Street -DUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review ( Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or.if you wish to be mlade a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations,-appeal• periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for.;this•:project,- please contact the Development Services_Division at-235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when callin. for-proper file identification. : ' ' • • 1 ;F1 NI' ± i . &W.34TH J 0` A ON J h• FARWEL ..•,-.- N f:: STEEL i iii4,Lii m mo° 'yysti ail < Q Ill HOME : w 04 V) i ►+ BASE �_I . � LU L11 cc - ` CD Ltit�a �e c\IZ ►-4Z • 1 M-+.LL) 'M9+ / .. _ ... Y 1 W W I--13-1 I-4 1 Z v) LL1 .1 m, NO c4 o w ' !-'H !i 1;t3 ' 1 ' LL . 14 j/ r t'1-7 +0 tX 10 0-1 < SY'+ C!! c? LL1 O+ Na) �, r•tL/1 1 GENMAL 0. c __r r'' g_W,MST ST. . _ •. . , . .• . • . - _ . . - • , 111'1111 1 11 1 I III! I I 111 I ii • • •• .1 posT- 7 -,,••"a AV RENTON 17:11 I U n 2 th .v 14t1t1 S iCeS DiVISI°R ••• • •.0 • 710114-4'96. d 2 , 5 • ... 4 en 1— •00 Mill IS AVe.huetoSno9u8055_ cc to WaShing 41. PB METER .1154076 • 12536070070-04- BURLINGTON NO 4N RAILR0A329999 ! PROPERTIES • 101I ' WEST VE SUITE 700 • SEATTLE • 98104 • H • . • • • 111111.1111.1111111111111.1.11.1 —'tit , `,-- NOTICE OFI`,.1OPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION RENTON, WASHINGTON An Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: G. I.JOE'S/LUA-96-136,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review(ECF)to construct a bulk retail store building approximately 55,031 Square Feet in size. Parking is proposed for 226 vehicles. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. ' GENERAL LOCATION: SW corner of East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit • The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be.made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional-notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when:calling forproper file identification. I O x -- _- �- - - —— • z n m • I Rm a . i z Al • 0 L S.W.34TH i 'FARWEST � - '`'> ' ` STEEL `" '=` ,,,g N"?� .':,ra y t nli 9 4 / . 1 • .,1;.-.... :-.,i'l 1 i HOME F..piR -j tl w d BASE 1---- 1 41 J � , I n' I " • ST. J . Yf ¢¢ Imi I—I 7'�J'�ely.e _ iI 1 VALLEY M9 L GENMAL J�i Yc I r S.W.41ST ST. , -- '-- - 1 H . __ , .. , i . PENDING APPLICATION . PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: O.I.JOESILUA•96-136,9A,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is requesting Adminislrolive Site Plan Approval (SA) end Environmental Checklist Review(ECF)to construct a retell store building approximately 55.031 Square Feel In size. Parking Is proposed for 226 vehicles. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. GENERAL LOCATION: SW comer of East Valley Highway and SW 341h Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: i Building Permit _Preliminary Plat _Shod Plat • _Conditional Use Permit _-Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shorelitine Conditional Use _Other Perm Fill a Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial _Other -Development Permit • The application can be reviewed In the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any Ume prior to Public Hearings.during Public Hearings,or prior to an administrative site plan approval.Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of I • applicant's'Notice of Apparition'publication In the Valley Daily News. For further Information on the application,or If , you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations.appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s)for this project,please contact the Development Services Division at 235.2550. _ 1,11. j We • 1 atanaH iiitij . --) j„„ .,, r r • t � J:• 11' ..---4----'_,..,.,.', A). 4jiii • . L aw..ar er. n II PLEASE INCLUDETHE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION:1;•;:"•I CERTIFICATION I. Scond )Gt fiLScirl ( hereby certify that 5 copies of the above document were postedlby me in S. conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . r1WWry U, tomie . Signed: Seticictit AVOYI STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ' _ certify that I know or have.satisfactory evidence that 40 . O signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and vole ri.adt"i Jfie..uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. = _:'q 0��Q my • W,yp'Ya••s /_ I�j YI Dated: ( �I Cf G)_� 12 '"t V.I.0 t / fi Notary Publi 1 and for State o1 V$lAi4�cgtlin.,u•• Notary (Pr' ` 6A Cr J.'^!" t i_a4e- My appointment expires: 6.l q/cl6 NOTARY.DOC • • 0 NOTICE PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: G.I.JOES/LUA-96-136,SA,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Approval (SA) and Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) to construct a retail store building approximately 55,031 Square Feet in size. Parking is proposed for 226 vehicles. The project would share the existing Home Base access drive off East Valley Road. GENERAL LOCATION: SW corner of East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat Conditional Use Permit Rezone XXXX Site Plan Approval XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use Other Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings,during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. Comments for Substantial Shoreline Permits must be received within thirty(30)days from the last date of applicant's"Notice of Application"publication in the Valley Daily News. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's,environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. . S.W.31ST ' i ii 3 1 u 3 J Z m 1. y V J L i S L i i ' srre , \ - / sW.34TH 'FASWEST STEEL .:...,.,:;,0 . { . i . . ' f--1 • �y3 HOME 1--PAAKIH6 1 " W SASE �.i W N. j ..• J • i:;••m 1 e i I I--I ST. .Q::�S g ig 1 1 € I I—r 3 a LL ::1: o '3•�'' VALLEY Ma {mac S.W.41ST ST. , r PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLINGLI N G'FOW PRO PERiFILE::IDENTIFICATION. >":'<>,. •• :° CIT: 'DF RENTON ..LL ,+ ,,; Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 4, 1996 Mr. Barton Treece Horton Dennis and Associates 320-Second Avenue South Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: G. I. Joe's Project No. LUA-96-136,SA,ECF Dear Mr. Treece: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to: submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for, consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on November 26, 1996. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at 235-2719, if you have any questions. Sincerely, • Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Mr. Martin Peterson/G.I. Joes., • ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper contains 50°.recycled material.20°.i post consumm _ ' ?� ,.:,:i;;�`L;is�ii:Y:•, rYii:i.:�?isv:?�:Ci�"v:+iiiiiiiii'�iiiiii��iiti::::isi:'}}?;:;�:f!;{:::ii::�?'.:??�:'r.•'.:i:::.�ri�:v : ..ri.v.. ...:......:... :i):•:i:•?r• :J}:'i:'::ti:: >::v:•}:«t.}}}'•}:•} :•}:•}:•:?^i}:i4:t! r`...... .....:.,..�.................:..gin•.::..•.�:............................:.......,r........._. ..n..:.r:::...:r::•:::.�:•::.,....r•{:.;•:is�yit/,, r ..::•n•::v�.4:::L•::::x.v.v::.•.v:w::•.:n•;••:::::.:v::::::::::::::w:n::.�:::::.; r.......::x:::.::� ::.:::?:::v::;:..:'..:.:......:'•.:k;.:•}.y.... ....... ..n...n...................n....:r.....................+............. ::'fin.:•:r..........r .: :.........:............. ...r.........,.. m;}:.:.:r./.•}}::•:}::.i::.: .i;:•::+: :::n.::.v:::::.........;...:::;....•x:..w.:v:•:.}::::.:.:.:.v.Sw::::::...., ♦:::::::•.::::::+::::: .. �v.v:v:........... :%^:�:}:tG:?L;::rr{: .:.. ...<..:/rf......... .r.:�:•:::{+Ji:v:4}}}:•;}}::?}}i:t'}::.titi•i};::ry::.+vr.}...:'t::::}::tt•}}:t•}Y}yt;: �.•::.}'r.:tih•.�::{:::::: ... :::::n:•:::.••:::::::::.: ............. ...+. �:+::::::n•.'.: .:.:..... CITY:.0�}:�i�Pt'T.ON.:..::.::::::.::.::.:::. . .. . ...., ..••.::::.....:::::v:::v.n:::::.v:.:::.:•:.v..v.:::.•.•.ii'i:{:;}::ii:•:•:?�i:•i}'I:::L' �::::>i}•.�.;<t:.;::t:4:}Y}:r.,n... ..,•:Y:<t? ::^%L•{}>}:::.;}i'?.>'>?.}':?.}•:.v:.•.w.v:r:v:?:....:...•.�:..n... � i:t::.y.........r............:.v:...:..:.....:. ..r:.,.. :.... :.:.:. .,,.. ...;.,. ... ?i:;iii:t+:�ii:ii?i}:�i::}t::;:;%'�:^:i��i:}' :}•i}:?:i:: .:...,:.:n:.,::.::...:'..::..'::��`�:"':���::�:�:��::'��:::;::`•:�.:....:...:.:....:..::: O. M NT`• Vl �E :: V t ......... .>:::%::<:}:t:;<>:;:.;::.i:::;>:t::::::::>::>:::}:..:>:.ii:<.;::.: ....: . .. S..DI SON. �./ :•:::Y;..:?v:.:. .................... ....... .y:'• ::::..:::::.::ii:f.i.ii:::.:.:::..vw;::::.:•rv.:::grn}:•Y:•Y}): . ;}}:} } my:<•y¢i,;. .............................4..y..............::•:•. :.: ri}}�t•}:^:•}}:•} •:::;....::•:: . ........... :. .....r ....................................r.,.n.. ...........::::::v:::...Y.•::: .........,......{.: / vnv::w:::vv......v........... ... .......r....... ...... ......................................:...:.:•.::fir::::::..:::::::.::: .. �•.9r v 'l: ::: •:.; •if.. • ....r...:..:.r...............:............:..............n................v::v:v,::.:::$}r v:.:;.;.:.;.......n..::v{:i}::::.:?:}:. .....................:..x:tv}}:i}•: .............. .. .... ......................... ..................... ......... .......... .......::::.n.r.... ...........:...r...n...•.................. •:w.w:w:/v:::.w::::n{4n�'f.: }<}�'i/'?::}i:�ii:i.:•}:..;: ... 3..........+::..::::.:....v::•r.v:r.v:.v:.. :...............v:n4:.::�:::.:: � ...........v .:.::.v: ... ;. .... .. ...... ... ... .;; .. ../::ji::jf:}%<:viii}ii�'}'y�•}:•.?$v.,/. :.....:..:.:.::...::;••v,:?t.}•};••:<: .}:::.t:.:::::.n•.v.:.T}.:4}}}:< :v AST ::•'.. • • • .;:.:::..:.}.•:;...;:.}'•:::::}:::.:•}:•}:t•}:•}}:ti:•i:.::.:;:?}:::a::::.}};Y?>.; .:.. ':.;: :•}: :: . .:.„,:„„::t•ii}::}•:'.}'::.:}}i>::.>>':;fir::.}':<.>}:'. ..: ;.: . .. ............. ..... . .............::.:.::....... .:... ... :.::: :.,. .:::::....:...... ... ....... s , ...: ..:.:........:.:.::.:.:.::..:....:.,:.., }, ?..tt::.:.:.}.:.::::....::::::: ............ .::..:;:::'.:...... ::.:: . .:..:.....:.... ..:..........:::,.:.., ..:.:?:}::t<:.:};}:.:::::::::::::::.:::::::}.:.:: ........... . .. ........................:.........:...n.:::g:...:v..:.::.....E :::..(...1.}...::::.::::..: :::.::.;:.::..•'.. ..:::::'t.>:.: ...::.::.::.:::.n:..:nPROJECT'<INFORMATION :(cont.):?:°:. ' Note `>If:the.0.1gW re ifiW ne'[8}aF owner`% lease`at ac x.. n a .. • 9.n�.;}i:•}•.}}}n.}}�f�.>,:};ii.it .h_a addjtigrial:: ii6i izia:Mast® 'Appikiii .kfot:eachrai: r>:;; ::g i.!i;,:.:.•''' ;.: EXISTING LAND USE(S): NAME: G.I. JOE'S EXISTING SITE 'IS VACANT C/O MR.. MARTIN PETERSON . • ADDRESS: PROPOSED LAND USES: MARTIN L. PETERSON 1127 PINE ST. SUITE 105 • . . 55,120 SF RETAIL STORE CITY: ' SEATTLE ZIP: 98101 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: IM ' TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 628=0460 . . - PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: '°;; ?< :::.i.n ir:ONTAO PERSQf1TAPP.L'CANT •':-.1.>: ::;: . IM USES • NAME: HORTON DENNIS AND ASSOCIATES ' C/O MR. BARTON TREECE EXISTING ZONING: • • ADDRESS: IM USES 320 SECOND AVE S. • PROPOSED ZONING: CITY: KIRKLAND WA • ZIP: 98033 IM SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 822-2525 3.7 ACRES FAX: (206) 822-8758 .. • : .::.;z:Y;:::. :::>::::>:;::r.::::.:::::::::t.;::.: t.;.::.:::;::..i::.::;.;::t.:;:,.:::t:.}:;'.:t::•....;•..:.:..:':..;:: :• :;;:% PROJECT VALUE: , :: �: :<:><>:%::>:%%�;�::<>:::%:%PROJCTINF:O.RMAT ON:� ` :;. :' :;:: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: G.I. JOE'S • • IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: NO S W COR E. VALLEY HWY @ SW 34thST'. , IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY • SENSITIVE AREA? V ED KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): NO 'OCT 3 i25' -col o -co Q1996 . DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • CITY OF RE4NTON • r e:�: n in nece ar. >: ::..;:.:..':>:.:.: ;; :::,?>;LEGAZ}:DESCRIPTION:::OF.:.... :....:.. :..::�. ... P . • Ei .. ... ..:.:..:..:G:.:::.::::::..::::::::::::::.::::::,::::::::.:::..:.,.:.:...:.....:..:::. .. .PE:OF::L1PPl CATION.::&:::F ES.::.:.: : :.�.....:. .:.:.::.:::::.:::::,:::,.:::>..::.::::.:::.::::: :.�::.�.::::. ..::.. I; c ::: [i«a.... il.... t..::.+' t es::thata �:"=:=.city">�staff.... ggt .:.f..:..: —ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: • _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ • _ REZONE • $ • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $_ TEMPORARY PERW.T $ TENTATIVE N.t'.T $ •• • - _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY I-'i..AT $� ji. SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ /, 0 _ FINAL PLAT $ • _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE • " S. . - , ' (FROM SECTION: . ) . ' ' —• PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ FINAL • WETLAND PERMIT $ . ' _ _ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT _ $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ _ SHORELINE REVIEWS: , _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ . • _ CONDITIONAL USE $ ' _VARIANCE • $ • _ EXEMPTION • $Nb Charce X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ C Us . • REVISION $ • :::;. ..'..'...: :'.: '.gagn:::<::::»::;<:>::>:.;<>:::.:::: 7> : ::Rii:1::.:><AFFIDAVIT:::OF:i!OWNERSH.IP:: ;<imm ? ::.:::<8. :><{<> >`>'o: `>>.;-i>swam':«'<g.:< . I, (Print Name)dOptitto&.7iLe.ce, L.declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,Lhe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements end answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true'and correct to the best of my knowledge end belief. • FATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to b•:fore me,a Notary Public,in and bibs. Gy / " .ce _ fqr the State of residin; 3t - (Na a of wner/ epresentative) . ,on the day of . J .- / Signature Owne /Representative) • . (Signature of Notary Public:) • ..:. ...... .•. ....:..:.:...: ..: ,....... :....e::......... .. : •:::'. :E..{ ...--.•.. .: .. :...:: :.: .. ... .. .. . :..:. . ... . . : . ..........::. • :.:. : . ... Ittsscnt c .. f# g•. . ..; : : :. . :Ctt :FIeVumnr, A. :l' .: .:::: ... A : R .SH PL : CU: LA :PP..: FP.: :TP ;:5::. : :: .P, ;;; :: : : .. . .. .. . , . . : : :: : 4> n: A : . : F ....: S . .SM : MH.P:::, .P.,>:: ;< CPA »:;? : : ? ?: .ri r ? :„ : : : : : yi , . .. . .. : . '. ...: AL..P.O TA E=>FFiO.VIDEO. $ di : . ....... ..... . ... . . .... : . . . REVISED 2/95 'r: FERRARI DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTS, PS • City of Renton October 17, 1996 -71 Development.Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055. ., _ z,z. z RE: G.I. JOE'S PROJECT NARRATIVE x FDG PROJECT NO. 96104.00 n go ,\ 1 33 The following describe the general goals of the proposed project. The proposed project consists of developing a retail store located on the corner m of East Valley Highway and S.W. 34th Street, immediately east of the new Farwest n , Steel facility. The site/building relationships will be addressed. z . • The proposed site is 160,905 s.f. or 3.69 acres. Currently the site does not have any existing structures nor does it have significant natural land formations, trees or bodies of water (please refer to Application No. LUA-95-204, SA, ECF). Existing buildings near the site are Farwest Steel facility to the west and Home Base to the south. A thirty foot easement is provided for a Burlington Northern railroad track which runs along the west side of the property. The scope of the proposed improvements include (not necessarily limited to) the retail store building (55,031 s.f.), fenced boat yard (not paved), parking to accommodate store and surrounding landscaping (30,700 s.f.). Additional fill will need to be brought to the site for preloading and earthwork. The proposed project shares the existing Home Base access drive to the south and should be adequately filled and graded. The existing site will be preloaded for the new structure. A site requirements and proposed design elements comparison follows: Total Square Footage of Lot: 160,905 s.f. Proposed Footprint of Building: 55,031 s.f. Percentage Lot Coverage: 34.2% Nco Total# Parking Spots Required: 4 Spots/1,000 s.f. Retail , Total # Parking Spots.Proposed: 4.10 Spots/1,000 s.f. Retail (226) a u' 30% (67.8) co Maximum # of Compact Stalls: �������� Proposed Compact Stalls 54 N Proposed %of Compact Stalls: OCT 3 0 1996 23.89% co Required Accessible Stalls (ADA): 7 N CEVELOPMjE,yrP�NNING 7 W Proposed.Accessible Stalls: CITY OF RLNTpN z., 0. a: 12277 134TH CT. N.E., SUITE 203, REDMOND, WA 98052-2433 G.I. Joe's 2 October 17, 1996 Required Aisle.Width: 24'-00" Proposed Aisle Width: 24' Required %of Interior Parking Landscaping: 5% Proposed Square Footage of Interior Parking Landscape: 15,020 s.f. Proposed %of Interior Landscaping: 9.3% Proposed Square Footage of All Other Landscaping: 156,800 s.f. Required Landscape Buffer Width: 5' Required Landscape Buffer Along East Valley Highway 15' and S.W. 34th Street Proposed Criteria Has Been Met: 15' Required Natural Landscaping Per City of Renton: 2% Proposed Natural Landscaping: 614 s.f. The retail store will be located between Burlington Northern Railroad Industrial Park to the north and Home Base retail store to the south. The main public view is from East Valley Highway and the east end of S.W. 34th Street. The main entrance lies on the south side and it does not appear that the building configuration, •height or location on the site will have any negative impact obstructing views or signage of existing surrounding structures. Site access for • deliveries is on S.W. 34th Street for retail access, one entrance is directly off East Valley Highway and the other is from a shared access road, a curb cut on East Valley Highway. If you have any questions, please fee free to call. Sincerely, Bart Treece- , 1 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1. Name of project, if applicable: G.I. Joe's Store, Renton, Washington 2. Name of Applicant: c/o Martin Peterson G.I. Joe's Co., Inc. Seattle, WA 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Horton Dennis Asc., Inc. 320 Second Avenue South Kirkland, WA 98033 Contact: Mr. Barton Treece (206)822-2525KT 4. Date checklist prepared: Ocr January19960� 3 0 1996 tOp 15, Ve. 5. Agency requesting checklist: ciO A �N�vi�,� 4 City of Renton , Planning/Building/Public Works 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is proposed to commence Dec., 1996 with completion scheduled for--- July, 1997. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None to our knowledge 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. We are not aware of any other pending applications or proposals for this property. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval Grading and building permits 2 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Construction of a 55,120 SF retail store on a 160,905 SF (3.7 AC) site with 236 parking stalls and related site civil and landscaping improvements (see attached project narrative.) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The general location of the project is the southern portion of Renton in the Green River Valley; Burlington Northern Binding Site Plan, lot I as per lot line adjustment auditors number 9511-2990-06 King County. ' 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one). Flat, oiling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Maximum 1%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. A soils report is provided as an attachment"A"to this checklist. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 23,500 cubic yards of fill material to be imported to the site from local borrow pits. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, soil erosion could 'Occur in connection with the proposed development since the entire site would be stripped of vegetation. Even though the site is flat, erosion could occur during rain and/or,wind storms that occur during the construction phase of the project. To minimize this potential for soil erosion, site preparation techniques would include temporary detention ponds and filter fences to reduce the impact of water runoff on the surface soil. Landscaping will be placed on all surfaces not covered with impervious materials. No significant erosion is expected following project completion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 87%coverage. Total Site Area: 160,905 s.f.; Building Area: 55,120 s.f.; Paving Area: 85,410 s.f. 4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. Erosion and sedimentation controls such as interceptor swales, straw bale barri ers, silt fences and straw mulch for temporary erosion protection of exposed soils should be applied during construction. Stabilized construction entrances and washpads should be installed at the beginning of construction and maintained for the duration of the project. All erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City of Renton requirements. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the Project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Development of the site, as proposed, would not result in any significant impacts to existing air quality. The primary impact from development of the proposed project are related to construction activities and future vehicle traffic. Dust generated from grading and construction vehicle activity would be a temporary nuisance in the general area. b. Are there any off-site soutcea of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Transport of materials on local streets should be controlled to minimize congestion during peak travel imes. This would minimize secondary air quality impacts caused by reduced travel speeds. Dust produced by construction can be reduced by using a number of techniques. Areas of exposed soils such as storage yards could be sprayed with water, oils, or chemical dust suppressants. Areas that might be exposed for prolonged periods of time should be covered with suitable groundcover to prevent wind erosion. Soils carried out of the construction area by trucks could be minimized by use of a rock mat as a transition zone from the construction site; wheel washing; washing or brushing truck undercarriages; and covering dusty truck loads. For soils that do escape the construction site on trucks, a daily street cleaning program for truck routes would help to minimize dust. 5 _ 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salt water, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Wetlands have been identified on adjacent sites ref. application no. LUA-95- 204, SA, ECF. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. • 4) Will the proposal require surface vj►ater withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. The proposed project will not require the withdrawal of surface water. However, surface water drainage wil be conveyed to the storm drain system in Lind Avenue SW west of the prb jest site. Surface water runoff will tie directed to an onsite water quality and detention facility. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. According to the City of Renton Community Profile, 1989, the site of the proposed project is not within either the 100-year floodplain or floodway. The FEMA flood plain maps for the City of Renton depict the project site as being outside of the 100-year floodplain as well. 6 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, all waste material from the site would enter the City's storm drain or sanitary sewer collection system. Based on the preliminary grading and utility plans for the project, all surface water runoff would be collected from paved areas and roof tops by storm drains and directed to an onsite water quality facility. b. Groundwater: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No, none. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water_Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, i known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? if so, describe. Future construction of buildings and site improvements would cover up to 87% of the site with impervious surface,�s. This would result in storm water runoff that would drain to the Springbrgok Creek, which flows back into the Black River. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Surface water could be contaminated by runoff containing oil and gas from parked cars on the parking lot and streets servicing the proposal. However, surface water runoff will be directed into an on site water quality facility. No storage of hazardous materials on site is proposed. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: On site storm drainage and water quality/detention capabilities. • • 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. dVhat kited and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All of the shrubs, grasses, and weeds on-site would be removed during the grading phase of construction. c. List threatened or endangered species known tp be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: All new landscaping and irrigation systems would be installed per the requirements of the City of Renton's landscaping ordinance. 8 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site (see next page): Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood strive, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric lighting, power, HVAC, gas heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use Of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: For the G.I. Joe's facility, energy conservation would consist of an insulated building envelope, HVAC with heat recovery features, automatic energy management systems, energy efficient light fixtures. ,The State of Washington has adopted model conservation standards for new commercial buildings, and as the City of Renton has adopted these standards, this, development would be consistent with these model standards. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? if so, describe. None to our knowledge. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire, police and ambulance services would be required on a basis consistent with similar facilities. No special services are required. 9 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None required. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Traffic from SR 167 and local arterials can be heard from the site but would not affect proposal. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: construction related (9 month duration) 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Long term: normal commercial traffic associated with a retail store daily 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None proposed. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant; adjacent site is a Home Base Warehouse store and Farwest Steel facility, surrounding sites are commerical uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IM f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? IM g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. 10 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 20 employees would work in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. i. . The proposed project is a concrete block structure that is similar in size, design and scale of the other industrial, warehouse, and commercial buildings in the vicinity of the site. The type of use proposed is also consistent with land uses adjacent to the site and in the surrounding area. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many Units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any, None required. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Maximum building height would be 44 feet at the highest at parapet at the store entrance. The majority of the building has a maximum height of 24'-3". Principle exterior material would be painted block aluminum storefront entrances/exits and metal canopies entrance/exits and service areas. • 11 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Appearance of the site would change from a vacant and undeveloped area to an urban use. Views from adjacent commercial and industrial uses toward the site would change from vacant fields to views of commercial uses with parking lots. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. A landscaping strip along the public right-of-way, interior parking lot landscaping, and perimeter landscaping consisting of a variety of trees, shrubs, and groundcover are proposed. An enhanced entrance facing the parking lot and a varied building painting scheme will serve to provide some aesthetic interest for the proposed project. See the project narrative prepared by the EKA Architects for additional information. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposals produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Exterior lighting for the improvements resulting from the proposed retail development would consist of wall lighting, parking lot lighting, with non-glare fixtures, and some signage. Any glare that may occur would happen at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazards fror i lighting would occur. The proposed landscdpir0 along East Valley Road could bd designed to minimize glare from headlights on adjacent property. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. All outdoor lighting would be shielded and directed downward or upward so as to minimize potential instrusion on neighboring properties. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Act III Theater Complex on nearby site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. 12 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. None required or proposed. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None are proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed project is located on a vacant site that fronts East Valley Road gat the intersection of SW corner of 34th Street; Lind Avenue SW is located one-half block west of the project site. The East Valley Freeway (SR 167) parallels East Valley Road and is one block to the east. The closest freeway interchange is located at SW 41st Street Where freeway southbound on- and off-ramps are available. Northbound on- and off-ramps for SR 167 are located at SW 43rd Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is not currently serviced by public transit. Route 155, which provides service to and from the Soutllcenter shopping mall, is the closet public transit lute to the project site. The closet bus stop to the site is several blocks to the south at SW 43rd and East Valley Road. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 236 stalls - None eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 13 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. not known g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Impact Fees. The City of Renton has recently adopted an Impact Fee Program. As mitigation for a project's impact to the area transportation system, the City of Renton requires an impact fee to help fund future capacity improvements within the City. Local Off-Site Improvements. No local off-site improvements are recommended. Since the project does not degrade the level of service at any study area intersection for 1996 conditions with the proposed project no specific roadway improvements are require. Frontage Improvements: Sidewalks will be_provided along East Valley Road and 34th St. Transportation Management Sidewalks will be provided along East Valley Road and S.W. 41st Street Consistent witty'City of Renton requirements. In addition, pedestrian access will also be provided along the proposed access driveway to Lind Avenue S.W. in order to allow patrons access to the existing transit service along Lind Avenue S.W. l 14 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes. The new development would require police and fire department service. G.I. Joe's Stores typically have some internal security personnel, but would need occasional assistance from municipal police in connection with crime investigation, traffic accidents, and similar incidents. The building developed on- site would be fully sprinklered, thus reducing the potential demand on fire department services. Future calls for fire service and emergency medical service would be expected. The impact on schools and health services would be minimal since most new employees are expected to be hired from the local labor pool. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, Water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. _ b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilities providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity', which Oght be needed. Sewer: City of Renton Telephone,:..GTE NW Water: City of Renton, Power: Puget Sound power and Light C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: MI't. Name Printed: ik . Date: 10 VA* • ;.fit«.:::?i4%.•:;{:'i+$:•.,:k:{;,•:;k;•Y}•:':u;,i,;,.;..;.;•>."?'?'^ �:"•Ra}y5;•:2:;.:SY+' .... .. .. .: .{ ri:.;...•}}�;tr,�:.:.�.•;••.;'{•<•}•.;::... y.;..;..,.:.;.; :.,•?':,:•:«:!>}::.}•.:<:.;>.,;,�:,;s,.r:.:;< , zan{zr ;fir.:. •rr+ic.•:...? r< s .>..wi{J,3, >;:,!%;•rr...{?�f.!.•}e.r•�r r.•: :>,vs}s:•��o-;>i•�•i>�;�'.•r.} ;:£;;.?{,{{ :.%.y{.. L:.,a:.:.,}�,.;.x.H::� f..:{# S•••,•.{:,•.:::�.•: ;.•r,.,..•f,{%fi :..r.+:?• a?i r�+G�r •?/::. t,..: :rf;tjil: 3'.G:,. :••.i%`%:S:r{•''•}4.:,••.•r.• �ri}r:•..t xa:}t•.:t•:.L'+M1; r:}rrr':i>ti''.'•.?::::k•:r:..'•'r?.•.{a.(''�iz '0 y�!/�*�:Y?+,•;,•,;..r .rf:•+?!+:rr •r/.?•.�h3tr.�>f r.;;.�f::.}� ; /..+�i%.r %':•'.%:•}::.:•.�•}.•::::.::.�.r...<:;.,• :•.La.: •a;�{::''4'?6' •fa}'<:•}:•::::.<r...:/:•:rr:`�!.: �..: :.F!.M:f:�!1!!•�.:ff• r ?<•S.Ch+•�C.t✓.,fi./i ,c,. ;;r r...r++Y,.�?r.•..?+/�>i lit�irr.0. },:v`.{4K•:??r+•^•:ti:•Y'`:it{a'a4{':::t4iti>'4\v Y%:•ti<•:} :::..'•! ::{:�•::::..;y•::•::+v:.::•.�•:+,.,.,yr... r7•�.:r.;LrMv:Yv,.%4•:W};Yf.,:$r�i}{•.}•{r/,n}y:��,.%:.�y,•�{ih':•.'Ly/,.r?:5/.%/r�h+ur::?k•. ::iv• f• r� .S.:,ir''•`•iS:}::'rri:,';:;�;:{{f{;<}2`�E}{::•L';<�>3!:::irl" :CY.::::r:.•.r :.?,.C>:. r'r' .f.;{ S+?��,.:a%r',.vYR::i:U?•i.?.r+'•.r::t:r.:%'%'i.?k.�+�r'.'•:' .�/al. tr`%}}•ar:::}:.,. •:,?,+:. ;?4. :i}i:r'.Eirr,'}: .r}r.,+.:+r.}:{r�::r}$.:a!}}:?r.;}. �,:•+hi�F } �:;rL<:;:.>%..:.}:',ht.b. '.:EL+oI?i�(E�:'•: 1'' .:L x'.};:�::;;•»'•;::.:..:r.... r}.:r.. .:....;, .r...�•.::f�•<:;:t•'.;:4i.•,}}::}.'•;•}:•:+.•::La:....::. :...},r.:n.Y..........: .. .. .. ..........,.. .. .. .:k.L:.:v � •::{,./.::4?.•.w:: r:.l; .}}'1..:.^:• '%::•i'r:. v.v.:::.{Y,.:n.•:. .�,}.?,...+.: ;: : va•.::::::}r\..,.:;..,y. •.v::;...v., :.. :.::. : .:::.:.....:::•.:}:�:::::::...n;. ..;�.;{. f,.}^;•.;:'a${4r} :.?4:.Y::.;.<{,::;S.y,.,:r ...<y. xt...,..{,}.:. c...A ? . .:M:Y;.;N {....,rxt.•r.,•R:. .:.:a.R.{tt:..,?•}rr.a•:::••::.a:::r}'aa.,:...Y},{:u;:;:';:;:;t;:}{•{.'•.k;:•::r{•},,;.., ,::,;.:.,;.i;};{;.;)` ..t.5 .,•.t; .{}}x C:•}:a:•:'.,v,:,{f`•:•,,..v:.r:p•i* C2x \..Y: .R. {. .Y.. a$y., y.:i;it . .!: 1 d.;::::.:'...�:. ;.. {;....,.;y.,.•..:•...:::•;: ,••S,.v......:.::...:... .::..:.:. :?::...•+..r..:.:..:..:?..k:?•YRo+..•:r%}.:.}.::?•.... }i+\•% }`Y{ :t;$.,:.YY.\,. Cii�.\�n :a!•:::{'%:+{ .:}. ' .:.. .�. .,, .. .. .:? ::.;,\:�{.%; };:}.;•}:•�., \:Yv`':'�S:y:�:?Sty; N DI .................:.�::::.:..:.......,...:.........,........rr:.•r.r.......:.:.....r.r..:::::.::::r.�?•r.•.:r.r::..:..r•.•...•tr:::::.}••:.•}:r.}:,}:.••:;•}}:•}:•}•••:•:a}}•.�r••,•.r:.;;;r{..�::..::•::.;..r,...;;..:.:......:.r .rr.•....r •:.:•::::.}.;.;:..•.r:.:.xo}:.}:%:{•:•;}><}:?•}:'•::•:r:x•:.�::::.v•::::.:!Fr::::.{.{.; � .: ...;.,.: ..:..y...............:.:.. ::•<•:rr,:.�ri%<:�}::`:{r/r}{�ix•r:.,::•::•::..;.}:.{..�:{.y..;..::r. (b i Y:r•};r.} aa,}•+.:• ':$}i} :}:aY} ..F,...../.Y{} •'•,}�;.{.�:.; }r is: .:1 y;,f;r• -' 1 :.,;r:, .......:..., ith 300.fee •>n��.4�ie:;e�b ect;sitd::�':;.r. � >:�;,>r{:r;:.,. }f.r..r.r... PROJECT NAME: G.I I. JOE'S. SEPA APPLICATION NO: 9(0 - I3(o ,SA I EL ' The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. , NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ' ''.. •HCWA REALTY CORP. 3345 MICHELSON DR. NUMBER C/O HOMEBASE SUPPORT CTR. IRVINE, CA 125360-0020-05 • , BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR 1011 WESTERN AVE. SUITE 700 125360-0070-04 • PROPERTIES INC SEATTLE, WA 98104 • EAST VALLEY 34 LLC 2001 WESTERN AVE. SUITE 330 125380-0030-09 • SEATTLE, WA 98121 • CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS PO BOX 3175 125380-0050-04 ATTN. FINANCIAL ACCTS. DEPT. PORTLAND, OR 97208 • MAGNUSON N A 918 S 138th ST 302305-9067-03 SEATTLE, WA 98168 BANYAN INVESTMENT GROUP 1018 SW 144th- • 302305-9118-02 ';: SEATTLE, WA 98166 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR 1011 WESTERN AVE. SUITE 700", 125360-0060-06 • PROPERTIES INC SEATTLE, WA 98104 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR 1011 WESTERN AVE. SUITE 700 125360-0080-02 • PROPERTIES INC SEATTLE, WA 98104 SEATTLE FUR EXCAHANGE 200 SW 34th ST. PO BOX 88159 125380-0040-07 SEATTLE, WA 98138 • .. POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOC. 737 MARKET ST 125380-0211-00 • • KIRKLAND, WA 98033 SSC PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC 1201 THIRD :AVE. SUITE 2200 302305-9104-.08 OPERATIONS ACCOUNTING SEATTLE, WA 98101 MAGNUSON NA 918 S 138th ST 302305-9067-03 SEATTLE, WA 98168 • SSC PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC 1201 THIRD AVE. SUITE 2200 02305-9104-08 OPERATIONS ACCOUNTING .• SEATTLE, WA 98101 RECEIVED • ryY kcA t l '4 I of(p OCT &O, 1996 S a-`' ii-+� l�L . OEVELofSMFNrP 1 ) r CITY OF R griNG (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • • C • 4 ;�>1 � o !)'•; - <. Y;`f .. .,w....,..,..e �..T q .T3. ./r �r: ��, '<k�a• •. 7'i • <u1v "' am•' •T?<h 'f:. ,c? .. !E1.�.� :K�+�„ \� T v .4. < 4:1, atS^•{.:'{ . :.ha; • E'F:,'•Sc�.,;?T•z�..$?�):TYti3:e p .;Y°`. T`OF: il:'.4 ,� k� '{•s nS.1 v..• g m }� S:T .� Q.. Yi fY:t S�SF,„k+�l;� S:i•vf,T�r.�•�'+•., Pw•,.. .?�:7.,v .w:�1vFY•. T�>w'i'.b:, }�$ :�T�v �(. (�� •':4�• }:.Av.'. :,�.T!.��'$�:is•� <. �}X}:Y{:� ::VfY�r /.:.v::yh{.xv,•,tyl: .�r.. � .}:i .� 'i't>'�.hy,� '�, ,k,}y k: tf'/. .?S�k} .•.t>:T'�.�'9%.':r':\''•,.;.?jf.•',;�:; >.•f...:iL:'• i}tt' •S: iT�r�:� ,>,:.s s. r f4if '^h;'n' E;t;'.>Y: ' 'wS °}} •.;d,.,..$.'�IYllfl: �:yi'... >;o.:o: .f�¢,y't.;,3.,G3,: : .......{;ti:: '.L...::.:..;;}`.M�xTT'•Yr�:%4\7a::�•,v K�: :. .•.• 3v�.,'.�,Y�TY�'ry, r y� rr'}:(S•� F .. •{�Ff�'�:,+.5:.1.:4:' : :. ..,yy. ' .Tq'v'. .. ..:..:. ... . . !!'liU��!lCt.;Y�t V.••N.',�S^�S•. Y..:3!Y ''�✓� ... PROJECT NAME: APPLICATION NO: • The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ALLENBACH, HERMAN + VELDY,S 144 SW 153rd ST, #A 302305-9118-02 SEATTLE, WA 98166 • HCWA REALTY CORP 3345 MICHELSON DR 125360-0020-05 • C/O HOMEBASE SUPPORT CTR. IRVINE, CA 92715 POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOC 737 MARKET ST. 125360-0070-04 C/O POWELL DEV. CORP KIRKLAND, WA 98033 LECUYER, CHARLES C. 330 MKT PL 2 2001 WESTERN AVE 125380-0030-09 C/O TEUTSCH PRTNRS SEATTLE, WA 98121 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS PO BOX 3175 125380-0050-04 ATTN: FINANC•IAL°ACCT. DEPT. PORTLAND, OR 97208 POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOC. 737 MARKET ST. 125360-0060-06 C/O POWELL DEV. CORP. KIRKLAND, WA 98033 1 • FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION PO BOX 889 — i_ 125360-0080-02 EUGENE, OR 98033 SEATTLE FUR EXCHANGE. 200 SW 34th ST. PO BOX 88159 125380-0040-07 ' SEATTLE, WA 98138 FARWEST STEELiCORPORATION PO BOX 889 125380-0211-00 EUGENE, OR 97403 • • • (2) • • • (Attach additional sheets,.if necessary) r. , . GEOTECHNICAL REPORT G.I. East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street:: Renton, Washington Project No. T-3063 1 • • .•<•-• Terra Associates, Inc. Prepared Martin Peterson and Associates: Seattle, Washington.. [ • RECEIVEn LA NG QECLOTPM3EN°T P1996NNI February 7, 1996 DEV : CITY OF RtNTON . . TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. • Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 Mr. Martin Peterson Martin Peterson and Associates 1127 Pine Street,Suite 105 Seattle,Washington 98101 Subject: Geotechnical Report G.I.Joe's East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Peterson: As requested,we have conducted a geotechnical engineering study for the subject project. The attached report presents our findings and recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction. In general, the site is underlain by five to six feet of dense granular fill overlying four to eight feet of clayey silt or peat. The clayey silt and peat are underlain by medium dense to dense alluvial sands. A six to eight-foot thick layer of very soft to medium stiff clayey silt was found at a depth of 26 feet. To reduce post-construction settlements to what may be considered tolerable levels, we recommend that the building area be pre-loaded with a surcharge fill. Following successful completion of the surcharge program, the proposed retail facility may be constructed using conventional spread footings placed on the existing fill or on new structural fill, as required. If the estimated post-construction settlements of one to two inches cannot be tolerated by the construction, you should plan for deep foundation support. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (206) 821-7777 , Mr. Martin Peterson February 7, 1996 The attached report describes our explorations and explains our recommendations in greater detail. We trust this information is sufficient for your present needs. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. I Sincerely yours, TERRA AS4Citi ES;INC. Kevin P; Roberts, .erts, PrE :,',. Project Engineer' - f) heodore J. Sch pper P E. Princip _p gr"6/Y3J 97 KPR/TJS:tm Fcc: Mr. Bart Treece,Horton Dennis and Associates, Inc. 1 1 f I Project No. T-3063 Page No. ii 1 C. l TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Project Description 1 2.0 Scope of Work 1 3.0. Site Conditions 2 3.1 Surface 2 3.2 Soils 2 3.3 Groundwater 3 3.4 Seismic Hazards 3 4.0 Discussion and Recommendations 3 4.1 General 3 4.2 Site Preparation and Grading 4 4.3 Surcharge and Settlements 5 4.4 Spread Footing Foundations 7 4.5 Timber Piling 7 4.6 Augercast Piling 8 4.7 Slab-on-grade Floors 9 F 4.8 Excavations 9 4.9 Utilities 9 4.10 Lateral Earth Pressures 10 4.11 Drainage 10 • 4.12 Pavements 10 5.0 Additional Services 11 6.0 Limitations 11 Figures Vicinity Map Figure 1 Exploration Location Plan Figure 2 Typical Settlement Marker Detail Figure 3 Reinforced Soil Wall Section Figure 4 Appendix Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Appendix A (i) Geotechnical Report G.I. Joe's East Valley Highway and SW 34th Street Renton, Washington 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project will consist of construction of a G.I. Joe's retail facility in Renton, Washington. The location of the project site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. Horton Dennis and Associates, Inc. provided an undated site plan showing the location of the retail facility and associated parking areas. We also received a site plan prepared by EKA Architects and Planners dated October 31, 1995. The plans show the location of the retail building at the northern portion of the site. A truck loading ramp will be constructed along the north side of the structure. Asphalt paved parking will be constructed south of a the structure with access off of East Valley Highway. The retail building will be constructed using pre-cast concrete tilt-up wall panels or masonry blocks. We expect perimeter bearing walls will carry structural loads of three to four kips per lineal foot with isolated columns loaded to a maximum of 100 kips. We also understand that finished floor grade will require raising the site with fill for a height of three to four feet. We expect floor loads to be 200 to 300 pounds per square foot(psf). The recommendations in the following sections of this report are based on our understanding of the project's design features. We should review final design drawings and specifications to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK On January 10, 1996, we drilled two test borings at the site to depths of 34 feet and 36.5 feet below existing site grades. We also reviewed a test boring log for the property to the east, near the boundary between the G.I. Joe's site and the adjacent Farwest Steel site. This log is included as Boring B-3 in Appendix A. Using the information obtained from the subsurface exploration, we performed analyses to develop geotechnical recommendations for project design and construction. Specifically, this report addresses the following: • Soil and groundwater conditions • Site preparation and grading • Foundation alternatives • Surcharge and settlements February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 • Lateral earth pressures • Slab-on-grade floors • Utilities • Pavements • Drainage requirements 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 Surface The subject site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of SW 34th Street and East Valley Highway in Renton, Washington. This location is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The site is bounded to the south and north by a HomeBase store and SW 34th Street, respectively. East Valley Highway bounds the site on the east. An open undeveloped parcel bounds the site on the west. The site and vicinity are flat. An existing railroad spur track enters the northwest corner of the property and curves in a southwestward direction to join a track leading west of the site. We noted that the track was raised slightly above surrounding grades. Shallow ditches filled with standing water were observed adjacent to the spur track. Vegetation at the site consisted of sparse grasses. Standing water was observed over much of the site at the time of our visit. Stormwater drainage from adjacent roadways is directed to storm drains along curbs and gutters located along the northern and eastern perimeters of the site. 3.2 Soils The soil conditions at the site generally consist of sandy gravel and silty sand fill overlying a variably thick layer of compressible peat or clayey silt. The compressible soils were underlain by generally competent sand deposits. • The sand was found overlying loose to medium dense silty sand. Each boring encountered fill soil comprised of gravelly to silty sand to depths of five to six feet. This material was generally medium dense to dense, but became loose near the contact with the underlying compressible strata. The compressible native soil under the fill mostly consisted of dark brown to gray-brown soft to stiff organic silt, clayey silt, and peat. Interbeds of gray to black sandy silt, silty sand, and sand that was stiff or medium dense to very dense was found underlying the compressible layer at depths ranging from 9 to 13 feet. At a depth of 26 feet, we encountered a five to six-foot thick layer of very soft to medium stiff, brown-gray to gray, clayey silt. The clayey silt was underlain by very fine to fine-grained silty sand that was gray and medium dense. Borings B-1 and B-2 were terminated within the medium dense silty sand. Page No. 2 February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 Figures A-2 through A-4 in Appendix A present more detailed descriptions of the subsurface conditions encountered in the test borings. The approximate test boring locations are shown on Figure 2. The Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington by D.R. Mullineaux (1965) shows that the soils are mapped as peat (Qlp). The peat seen in Boring B-2 correlates with the published description of this soil unit. 3.3 Groundwater We encountered groundwater in all of the test borings at depths ranging from five to ten feet below the ground surface. Groundwater levels observed are recorded on the attached Boring Logs, Figures A-2 through A-4. Some fluctuation in the depth of the groundwater will occur seasonally and annually. Given the time of year our 1. exploration was completed, the observed levels likely represent near seasonal highs. 3.4 Seismic Hazards The Puget Sound area falls within Seismic Zone 3 as classified by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology, Table 16-J of the 1994 UBC indicates a site coefficient of 1.5 should be used in design of the structure. We reviewed the results of our field and laboratory testing and analyzed the potential for liquefaction of the site's soils during an earthquake. Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in pore water pressure induced by vibrations from a seismic event. Based on the information obtained and considering the additional confining stresses from the building and fill weight, it is our opinion that the risk of liquefaction-related impacts to the structure are minimal. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 General Based on our study, in our opinion, there are no geotechnical constraints that would preclude construction of the proposed retail facility. The primary geotechnical concern for construction at this site is the four to eight-foot thick layer of clayey silt and peat at depths of 5 to 13 feet below existing grades. Consolidation of these soils will occur when subjected to loads comparable to those expected from construction of the retail facility. Our analysis also shows that some compression of the very soft to medium stiff clayey silt layer found at a depth of 26 feet will also occur. Page No. 3 February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 A fill surcharge program implemented prior to construction will consolidate the compressible soil layers and induce most of the primary settlements under the expected loads. Once the primary settlements are complete, lesser amounts of secondary settlement will continue throughout the life of the structure. These secondary settlements are in addition to settlements from placement of the building's foundation. Buildings that are relatively settlement-tolerant can typically be supported on conventional spread footing foundations following completion of a surcharge program. Analysis indicates that over a 50 year span, 1.5 inches of total secondary settlement and 3/4 inch differential settlement are expected. We expect some cracking of masonry block walls with the post-construction settlements of a magnitude anticipated at this site. If the settlements cannot be tolerated by the facility, a deep foundation alternative will need to be considered. The foundation option chosen for design of the retail facility will depend on the amount of risk of damage to the structure from differential settlement that is acceptable to the owner. The following sections provide more detailed recommendations and discussion regarding the anticipated settlements for each foundation option. 4.2 Site Preparation and Grading r Following clearing, the fill surface should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment prior to placement of additional fill. Soft, yielding areas should be overexcavated to firm bearing soil and replaced with structural fill. Where excavations to achieve firm conditions are excessive, the use of a geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 500X in conjunction with limited overexcavation and replacement with a structural fill can be considered. Typically, 18 inches of clean granular structural fill over the fabric will achieve a stable subgrade. Our laboratory results show that the existing fill was above its optimum moisture content at the time of our investigation. Some of the fill soils encountered at the site contain up to 32 percent_by weight of fines and will be difficult to compact if their moisture conditions cannot be carefully controlled. Extreme care should be taken to ensure that the exposed surfaces of the on-site fill do not become disturbed due to weather and construction traffic. Moreover, the ability to use these soils as structural fill will depend on their moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time of construction. It will be difficult to achieve proper compaction of these soils when their moisture content is above optimum. When the moisture content is excessive, the soil can be dried by aeration to a moisture content which will allow for proper compaction. We recommend that the structural fill required to achieve site grades consist of inorganic granular soil meeting the following grading requirements: Maximum Aggregate Size 6 inches Minimum Retained on the No. 4 Sieve 25 percent Maximum Passing the No. 200 Sieve 25 percent (Based on the Minus 3/4-inch Fraction) (see following narrative) Page No. 4 February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 If fill placement takes place during wet weather or if the moisture conditions of the fill material cannot be controlled, consideration should be given to importing fill soil that conforms with the above gradation, but with the maximum passing the No. 200 sieve reduced to five percent. Structural fill materials should be placed in uniform loose layers not exceeding 12 inches and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the soil's maximum density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of compaction should be within about two percent of its optimum, as determined by this same ASTM method. Prior to placing foundations and floor slabs, we recommend probing or proofrolling the structural fill surfaces to determine if any isolated soft and yielding areas are present. As discussed above, soft or yielding areas should be overexcavated and filled to grade with structural fill or crushed rock. It may be necessary to protect foundation and slab areas with lean mix or a layer of crushed rock to guard against soil degradation. Construction traffic must not be allowed on subgrades that have been prepared just prior to foundation or slab placement. A representative of Terra Associates, Inc. should observe all proofrolling operations. We also recommend field evaluations at the time of construction to verify stable subgrades. 4.3 Surcharge and Settlements As discussed, for spread footing foundation support and slab-on-grade construction, we recommend placing a surcharge fill over the building area. The surcharge program is necessary to limit building settlements to what may be considered tolerable levels. Our surcharge and settlement analysis is based on an assumed existing ground surface elevation of 12 feet. In addition, our analysis is based on a finished floor (top-of-slab) elevation of about 16 feet and the anticipated floor loads discussed above. We should review the final foundation and grading plans in order to better assess expected settlements. Primary Consolidation The site grades should be raised using structural fill as outlined in the Site Preparation and Grading section. Once grade is achieved, an additional four feet of fill should be placed as a surcharge. This surcharge fill does not need to meet any special requirements other than having a minimum in-place unit weight of 125 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). However, it is advisable to use a good quality fill which could be used to raise grades in other portions of the site, such as parking and driveway areas, if necessary. We do not believe it is necessary to place a surcharge of fill within the parking and access easement areas if grades at these areas are raised to elevations comparable to the building area. In any case, the structural fill required in the pavement areas.should be placed as soon as possible to allow time for consolidation of the compressible layers and reduction of potential settlement impacts on pavement and utilities. The estimated total primary settlements under the recommended surcharge range from 6 to 13 inches across the building area. These settlements are expected to occur 12 to 16 weeks following full application of the surcharge loading. The actual period for completion and magnitude of the primary settlements will be governed by variations in subsurface conditions at the site. Page No. 5 February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 The rate of consolidation can be accelerated by installing sand or wick drains at regularly spaced intervals throughout the pre-load fill pad. Alternatively, an additional thickness of fill surcharge will accelerate the rate of primary settlement. We can provide specific recommendations for either option if acceleration of the surcharge settlement period is desired. To verify the amount of settlement and the rate of movement, the surcharge program should be monitored by installing settlement markers. A typical settlement marker installation is shown on Figure 3. The settlement markers should be installed on the existing grade prior to placing any building or surcharge fills. Once installed, elevations of both the fill height and marker should be recorded daily by a registered land surveyor until the full height of the surcharge is in place. Once fully surcharged, readings should continue weekly until the anticipated settlements have occurred. It is critical that the grading contractor recognize the importance of the settlement marker installations. All efforts must be made to protect the markers from damage during fill placement. It is difficult, if not impossible, to evaluate the progress of the surcharge program if the markers are damaged or destroyed by construction equipment. As a result, it may be necessary to install new markers and to extend the surcharging time to ensure that settlements have ceased and building construction can begin. We recommend that the surcharge pad extend a minimum of five feet beyond the building perimeter and then slope down at an inclination of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). The site plan shows the northwestern corner of the building may be as close as ten feet from the railroad spur that runs adjacent to the western property line. Where sufficient area is not available to slope the surcharge and reduce the impact of settlements due to surcharge on the rail line or other adjacent structures, the surcharge may be supported at a nearly vertical inclination (minimum { 1:12) using a reinforced soil wall. Figure 4 shows a typical reinforced soil wall section. Post-construction Settlements Primary consolidation of compressible soils at the site will be achieved upon completion of the surcharge (pre- load) program. Secondary consolidation will continue at the site throughout the life of the structure. During secondary consolidation, you should expect a maximum post-construction settlement of 1.5 inches and differential settlement of 3/4 inch. These values represent expected settlements over a 50 year period. We anticipate that most of these settlements will occur within five to ten years after completion of the structure. Impact of Surcharge on Adjacent Roadway and Utilities Depending on its location, the proximity of the surcharge fill pad to the adjacent railroad spur and roadways may result in settlement of these structures due to soil beneath them being influenced by the pre-load fill pad. We recommend placing monitoring points on the roadway curbs and pavement to record possible movements during surcharge. A similar monitoring program should be implemented for the railroad spur if it cannot tolerate possible settlement from the pre-load. Sufficient monitoring points should be established since some of these points will likely be disturbed by traffic. In addition, we suggest making a photographic survey of the pavement before placing the surcharge to document if new cracks develop during and after the area is surcharged. Page No. 6 February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 We understand a fiber optic telephone transmission cable is located within a utility easement adjacent to SW 34th Street and East Valley Highway. This utility line as well as other utilities within the easement may experience vertical and/or lateral movement as a result of the stress changes in the soil associated with the placement of a pre-load fill pad. Utility organizations should be prepared to relocate utilities as required prior to construction of the pre-load. 4.4 Spread Footing Foundations Following the successful completion of the surcharge program, if the above estimated settlements are considered • tolerable, the building may be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on a minimum of four feet of structural fill. Existing competent fills may be included in determining the depth of the structural fill. Perimeter foundations exposed to the weather should be at a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below final exterior grades. We recommend designing foundations for a net allowable bearing capacity of 3,000 psf. For short-term loads such as wind and seismic, a 1/3 increase in this allowable capacity can be used. With the anticipated loads and bearing stresses, the estimated total settlements are as discussed in the Post-construction Settlements section. fr For designing foundations to resist lateral loads, a base friction coefficient of 0.4 can be used. Passive earth pressures acting on the side of the footing and buried portion of the foundation stem wall can also be considered. We recommend calculating this lateral resistance using, an equivalent fluid weight of 350 pcf. We recommend not including the upper 12 inches of soil in this computation because they can be affected by weather or disturbed by future grading activity. This value assumes the foundation will be constructed neat against competent fill soil or backfilled with structural fill as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section. The recommended lateral resistance value includes a safety factor of 1.5. 4.5 Timber Piling If estimated post construction settlement is not considered tolerable, you can consider transferring structural loading below the peat and gray-brown clayey silt layers with the use of timber piling. We estimate that timber piling having a minimum tip diameter of eight inches will achieve an allowable axial load of 25 tons when driven into the medium dense to dense, black sand at a tip elevation of 18 feet below existing surface grades (Elev. -6). This allowable axial load takes into account potential negative loading caused by downdrag on the pile due to consolidation of the organic layer under building fill and floor slab loading. Full axial capacity can be used provided the piles are spaced at a minimum of three pile diameters. Closer spacing in pile groups will require a reduction in the single pile capacity. This reduction will depend on the number of piles in the pile group and the spacing used. For resistance to lateral loading, a lateral pile capacity of four tons can be used. Estimated pile settlements are 3/4 inch and less. This includes the expected approximately 1/3 inch compression under pile loads of the very soft to soft clayey silt at a depth of 26 feet below existing grade. Elastic shortening of the pile is not included in the above values. Page No. 7 February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 To successfully install timber piling at the site, it will probably be necessary to pre-drill the upper five to six feet of existing fill soils. The pile driving hammer used to install the piles should have sufficient energy to drive the piling to the estimated tip elevation without damage to the pile. For this purpose, we recommend that the pile driving equipment have a minimum rated energy of 15,000 foot-pounds with an efficiency factor of at least 70 percent. We also recommend that prior to ordering production piles and their installation, a minimum of three test piles be driven at the site to verify anticipated tip elevations and establish driving criteria for use in evaluating production pile capacities. The test piles should be driven with the same equipment that will be used in the production pile installations. 4.6 Augercast Piling Augercast piling can be considered as an alternative to timber piling in transferring foundation loading below the peat and gray-brown clayey silt layers. For 16-inch diameter pilings with a tip elevation of 18 feet below existing surface grades, an allowable axial load of 30 tons is available for design. This loading takes into account the potential negative loading affects due to downdrag. } Similar effects on reduction of axial pile capacity due to close spacing as discussed in the above section apply to augercast piles. For resistance to lateral loads, an allowable lateral pile capacity of four tons is available. The estimated pile settlement is one inch and less. This includes an approximately 1/2 inch compression under pile loads of the very soft to soft clayey silt at a depth of 26 feet below existing grade. Elastic shortening of the pile is not included in the above values. Augercast piles are formed by the pressure injection of grout through a hollow stem auger which is slowly retracted from the ground after advancement to the recommended tip elevation. The grout pressure used will compress the soils within the immediate vicinity of the pile, thereby increasing to some extent the pile diameter and the amount of grout required to construct the pile. For planning purposes, we suggest considering a 30 percent increase in the amount of grout necessary to form the pile. In construction of augercast piling, a higher than normal reliance on quality workmanship ,is required for successful installations. It is extremely important that the grout pressure be consistent and uniform during the installation and that retraction of the auger occurs at a slow uniform pace beneath a sufficient head of grout in the pile column. The contractor should have adequate means for verifying grout pressure and estimating the volume of grout used in the construction of the piles. Because of the compression affects and the possible influence on adjacent pile construction, the installation sequence should be based on a minimum pile spacing of five pile diameters. Once the grout column has achieved its initial 24 hour set, pile construction in between these spacings can be completed. Page No. 8 February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 4.7 Slab-on-grade Floors With site preparation completed as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section, new structural fill soils should be suitable for supporting slab-on-grade construction. Immediately below the floor slabs, we recommend that an allowance be made for placing a six-inch layer of clean free-draining sand or gravel which has less than five percent passing the No. 200 sieve. This capillary break will guard against wetting of the floor slab due to the underlying soil conditions. Where moisture via vapor transmission is not desired, a polyethylene vapor barrier should also be installed. We suggest that this vapor barrier be placed on an initial four inch layer of the capillary break material and then covered with the final two inches to help protect it during construction and to aid in uniform curing of the concrete floor slab. For slab thickness design with respect to floor deflection due to traffic and point loadings, a subgrade modulus of 300 pci (pounds per cubic inch) can be used. Estimated floor slab settlements of less than 3/4 inch are expected due to post-primary consolidation. This movement assumes that settlements due to required building fills would be allowed to occur prior to floor slab construction. The floor movements would be entirely differential with respect to the foundation construction. 4.8 Excavations 6 Excavations greater than four feet in depth will need to be completed in accordance with local, state, or federal regulations. In accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), inorganic soils encountered at the site would be classified as Group C soils. Accordingly, excavations made within the native soils or fill at the site greater than four feet in depth but not exceeding 20 feet in depth will need to be laid back with side slope gradients of 1.5:1. Due to the low strength characteristics of the on-site peat, we recommend that excavations within this material be shored using a ditchbox or temporary bracing. As another option, a trench shoring box to support excavations throughout the lower depth may be used in conjunction with sloping of the upper portion of the excavation as outlined above. Dewatering of the excavation will need to be considered where excavation depths exceed five feet below existing site grade. 4.9 Utilities We recommend that all site utilities be bedded and backfilled in accordance with applicable APWA specifications. For site utilities within City rights-of-way, bedding and backfill should be completed in accordance with City of Renton specifications. At a minimum, utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with recommendations presented in the Site Preparation and Grading section. Where 1 utilities will occur below unimproved areas, the degree of compaction can be reduced to a minimum of 90 percent of the soil's maximum density as determined by the referenced ASTM standard. Because of the potential for long-term settlements, utility pipe joints and connections should be of flexible nature allowing for up to one inch of differential movement. Page No. 9 February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 4.10 Lateral Earth Pressures ( The magnitude of earth pressure development on retaining walls constructed in loading dock areas will partly depend on the quality of backfill. Where fill is placed behind retaining walls, we recommend placing and compacting it as structural fill. The fill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry unit weight as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor). To guard against the build up of hydrostatic pressure, wall drainage must also be installed as discussed in the Drainage section. With granular backfill placed and compacted as recommended and drainage properly installed, we recommend designing the restrained (not free to deflect) retaining walls for an at-rest earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 50 pcf. A value of 35 pcf may be used for the case where the wall is unrestrained (free to deflect). These values do not include other surcharge loading such as from fill backslopes or adjacent footings that may act on the wall. If such conditions will exist, then the imposed loading must be included in the wall design. Friction at the base of foundations and passive earth pressure will provide resistance to these lateral loads. Values for these parameters are provided in the Foundations section. 4.11 Drainage Surface Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the building areas at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or collect adjacent to foundations or within the immediate building area. We recommend providing a gradient of at least three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the building perimeter, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of one percent should be provided unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structure. Subsurface In our opinion, with the area immediately adjacent to the structure paved, and positive surface drainage maintained, perimeter foundation drains would not be necessary. If the grade is not positively drained away from the structure or is landscaped, perimeter foundation drains should be installed. To guard against hydrostatic pressure development, retaining wall drainage must be installed. We recommend that wall drainage consist of a minimum 12 inch thick layer of washed rock or pea gravel placed adjacent to the wall. A four-inch diameter perforated pipe should be placed on a bed of gravel at the base of the wall footing and gravel drainage column. The pipe should be directed to a suitable outlet. 4.12 Pavements With subgrade soils as prepared as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section, suitable support for pavement construction should be provided. However, regardless of the compaction results obtained subgrades must be in a stable non-yielding condition prior to paving. Immediately prior to paving, the area of the subgrade should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment to verify this condition. Page No. 10 February 7, 1996 Project No. T-3063 The required pavement thickness is not only dependent upon the supporting capability of the subgrade soils but ( also on the traffic loading conditions which will be applied. For light commercial vehicles and typical passenger vehicle traffic the following pavement sections are recommended: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base(CRB) • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base(ATB) For heavy truck traffic areas,we recommend the following pavement sections: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB If there is a potential that pavement construction will be delayed until the wet winter months, the subgrade soils must consist of a clean granular material as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section. In addition, we strongly suggest that the subgrade be further protected by placing a layer of ATB on which construction traffic could access the project without excessively disturbing the subgrade soils. The ATB thickness for this purpose should be four inches. Repair of failed ATB areas should be anticipated prior to final paving. However, the overall integrity of the subgrade soils will be considerably less impacted with this protection provided. Because of secondary compression of the clayey silt or peat layer some degree of post-construction settlement within the pavement structure should be anticipated. This settlement will probably result in some longitudinal and transverse cracking of the pavement. Cracks in the pavement should be sealed in a timely fashion to prevent excessive surface water infiltration into the subgrade soils. 5.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Terra Associates, Inc. should review the final design and specifications in order to verify that earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated in the project design. We should also provide geotechnical services during construction in order to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations. This will also allow for design changes if subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. 6.0 LIMITATIONS We prepared this report in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This report is the property of Terra Associates, Inc. and is intended for specific application to the G.I. Joe's project in Renton, Washington. This report is for the exclusive use of Martin Peterson and Associates and their authorized representatives. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data obtained from the test borings drilled on-site. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations appear evident, Terra Associates, Inc. should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations in this report prior to proceeding with construction. Page No. 11 .. . A ..I \ I H I • 1 :T. x 1 —11 I s;.-rH i r\ /I'— sr '^` ((Er R1an " I �1 , -n I — pq I •� .. ., . .F 1 1••1 'ra 1 51 i 8 ;:•. poi■ ! ...at y ♦ a` - pia i:'�.-,, I Z l. \ I 'II 5 I 3I Asoto •'syI �/ ATOY Y1l4Gf..i.',' j(• �` - .i=r15� ,� W 1N/ '. �CC[AT(Rpi sr- 4`M4R 1. .g 1` : k'\ FENTON 1, tIJI Goo Si . 5 RF)TOH YtLUGF Pl. 5 IITH•Si • r . ,, \, ,1 sl L r\ •4.� 2474 �� \ •a < J 1._!...!.......„L,(.0, . rJ Y ._�� S16TH STV i ) .... sT LL4 ' I ' 3: of ��I ^ '^ S © !g•,1.. Y`ifnlc . 1. • I /, ; al CI ii I Q 'ran. 1. <I 'S 7BTH n I r f IH• •.�.,„ ><•7 i L'JKACRES Y. -v I' -SW Ism ST I.r'''.. .n N�I =! ST G I4 J�`''�•yil ' { ,' „�, R,LE I lyi C 5 19TH 1,SiS vTALR07 I 1\ • '` nI • I Lar..ACRES 1 7 I 9 1s▪ Si. .to I 1 S ..,_v,�...u� 9KWY Ia \ ,, .,r TUCK I ma CIS sW,21STis, r =/aL re cw .PUGET 144 Gn^rey 1 IY r TTtb^X ' =b p, 4, ¢.u::F : s n,.s AM 14...2 214. I• act5i I =I a) s T d yR�f r I. `61 I w ..,,v ST 27RD ; ST q' r 1 fY R 9ARER aLYD �I jr j i I .'.1- > no.+r• ._+ Y.10 1 "I '..I �'� ;< i If mil- !_ 1 J 1\=^ �c jee r_ F/i\''s ■ 1.. I YO P ' 5RENTON j 5W 12iTH sr27TH ST SE i6C'H , I :fin, ° . �•„to"C's ,s s TRIH'..s �'8 ! TRECX I IN g v1 A'�j+ \� I.T nl� ,c,<irl <'I •ni DR °� ,<r UNCTION T .�/ • .�`J s • Isr 1 L z57H Si 30TH .c • -i = sF I ! Mw.r 1 SW• 330, Sv1D]RD Si 1 ' ' ;S&! t :r4�•*eerr j " 'laJ �SI MMMTH iL •I$ ` " } ' iI i I II, 1 l.s ' �a�'�` _ _i _1 St_S -T 2 1: 1 �ATN . _ .. , ...: '+ .::'C S CSC i 1aN0 ST SE'- II I �' ntH(LR -i BLYD •. / 4:, I o a J 1 t N__ 't•I t :�BJ: < �'% i / se.38TH• SH MN ST :1 n / a A `A•H,, -. .:i"N_»r_ ,. •� cc f r �_tI i � 7 1 ri Si '^ 1 1 "I r.r a.�(7H -._ yri _ ` `S SE r i . ._ • � < <'/ j`;0.,-..;-.. SE i76T � ' o , a;pRILLAL SITE 5T Y s-i -L ;• sI ! _, _1 I ,3:A, T". orb I F. 3' fN =i� g 1 4� i I , �i =jx :, a:T!`j _� Ea- -I � ""`�S :I I i SW t3Rt �I< ST1 9.f• SW I a<3RD i 5 5' ��cp9� i I t:� •[�st:en•`. ':, \ • N, I 1 I Q•,' eAS I I -� I- 'a, `\\ I ! SE 1E2H0< <I _ RhE�1 .5 I;MO_ I C - ,T (. �.i I F - �� I KI I I 1 11 £•T T • ,,, OR` •�� ,i'sr JO I! ce0 IL�1 _! 1. ^r.y I I. a 5E .., t s SRRLvKdRC4X .n i „� I ,¢( ,'r RL -r f` IA < I' GnEE.Y9ELT J 4 '` S�k,/I In " T! �' SE :N >tioo' !• dLYO I 1 I<' ( i ` 1 �� 15tTH:� j5 5� ' �; RENTON - - :7, i • SE :E�_. 1 1 22 - � si:ti I _- �' • e- ST •_, s 1567N SI 1 ± S 15634 ST :e5TH s 1 'S_L ST. I ,. =ir sr is i sr:se �:1. 37r CT s< 5E ST ir q c '�. \ st:a:.Is c ryu=:..,'•T. 190TN I a 190TH ST •5 ...iH Si I : •a: + > St t...ST - �I <I } i N I i I ft a:•. . sl`;•s. I` St_.-.Pt at a.'S'•4'i: •: 19240 _ ___ ��—S�°2 D°!c 1c2HD ST c•c,gD•ST .•'1'• / ,5 SETH ST I i- SE '_! -192N0' Si si el if gi I JI •r..I Is t sW 194 4 ST �I'SW 1' vIt 4TH - v I 'l �rl 1= =i '-ri :.p �s , t •.. SE:e<:R. T �! , 5TI 1 i J,�5 196711,_ 5 15ETH ' ST 1 l__—__ .•`< SC 155TH ST 11, '^ c I , 5 '-.71 _ST IS,r�•�=-I -`.+:,1 <I ' I1 I I1.dT.i 5T.s<•:Se-H ST .,,! T r r �"/,.�3 l _ !SE • , • 3I j i/ I S 20DTH .s m, MT11 .ti r� IS" 20D=H r si •�� I-- �! i:f SE ST 200TH ST •1 II • I ,n' C' _1 .` ,".- ..` I a. I e ni DI s• zc:ss'1 1 -- i5 r 202N0�' ' cr .I I i - 1 • REFERENCE: THE THOMAS GUIDE, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PAGES 655, 656, 685 AND 686, 1995 EDITION. l VICINITY MAP TERRA G.I. JOE'S � QQv ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No.3063 Date 1/96 Figure 1 t i i ) �-Os]Y7e• 1 i l I R.fete, • Sn.r,• - — , G.o77Ye,• e.eel eY R-emes '--- I \\ t- }; A Q i � I'ttu . = Ill =J� `\ CC APPROXIMATE SCALE 100 O • 100 200 feet ` coJO'RuIROfD o uscear �``` __ LEGEND: .., C-----\..1.04,-F-ia.,,gB-3 » -i—t* t APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION • APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION FROM TERRA ASSOCIATES REPORT T-3064, DATED FEBRUARY, 1996. umn i A - GJ.JOE'S — B- • REFERENCE: — Jmum r SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY HORTON DENNIS AND >" = _ ASSOCIATES, INC., JOB No. UNKNOWN, UNTITLED B-2 AND UNDATED. Win '--llllll ► ► ► I1 ► 111 ► 1if1 � R.feea' ee.., EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY - EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN ,-�`.. TERRA G.I. JOE'S • ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON - ' ' "otechnical Consultants Proj. No.3063 Date 1/96 Figure 2 r 1 STEEL ROD 0 PROTECTIVE SLEEVE .. • HEIGHT VARIES : • •.••. . • • • SURCHARGE (SEE NOTES) • ..:. SURCHARGE : . OR FILL • . ' . •• . :„ ;..•• ••' OR FILL •' 1. - •. ` .. _ I I •. .. ¢ lI II Q ' r- I NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. BASE CONSISTS OF 1/2" THICK, 2'x2' PLYWOOD WITH CENTER DRILLED 5/8" DIAMETER HOLE. 2. BEDDING MATERIAL, IF REQUIRED, SHOULD CONSIST OF CLEAN COARSE SAND. 3. MARKER ROD IS 1/2" DIAMETER STEEL ROD THREADED AT BOTH ENDS. 4. MARKER ROD IS ATTACHED TO BASE BY NUT AND WASHER ON EACH SIDE OF BASE. 5. PROTECTIVE SLEEVE SURROUNDING MARKER ROD SHOULD CONSIST OF 2" DIAMETER PLASTIC TUBING. SLEEVE IS NOT ATTACHED TO ROD OR BASE. 6. ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF STEEL ROD CAN BE CONNECTED WITH.THREADED COUPLINGS. 7. ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE CAN BE CONNECTED WITH PRESS—FIT PLASTIC COUPLINGS. 8. STEEL MARKER ROD SHOULD EXTEND AT LEAST 6" ABOVE TOP OF PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE. 9. STEEL MARKER ROD SHOULD EXTEND AT LEAST 1' ABOVE TOP OF FILL SURFACE. TYPICAL SETTLEMENT MARKER DETAIL _;- `• TERRA G.I. JOE'S • ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON • ' • eotechnical Consultants Proj. No. 3063 Date 1/96 Figure 3 f i SLOPE 12:1(V:H) COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL MINIMUM 95% MAX. DRY DENSITY t 2% OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT PER D-698 (STANDARD PROCTOR) • . ' . •.'0.8H feet (TYPICAL) • . • • ' • • J • • • ' ' 3 feet • •' ^ . ..' • .• .' :' .. ;•• .' •: • •1• .. :` • (TYPICAL)"". • H feet . .. . I. 18 in. (max.) .. ' ' . ' MIRAFI 600X • •' . • .. • ' GEOGRID (TYPICAL) .. • .. . . .. I NOT TO SCALE REINFORCED SOIL WALL SECTION •17 !`r.'''''.-:. TERRA G.I. JOE'S ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON • ' eotechnical Consultants Proj. No. 3063 Date .1/96 Figure 4 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING G.I.Joe's Renton, Washington On January 10, 1996, we performed our field exploration using a truck-mounted hollow stem auger drill rig. We explored subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the site by drilling two hollow stem auger test borings to a maximum depth of 36.5 feet below existing grade. An additional test boring was drilled on the adjacent Farwest Steel site. This log is attached as Figure A-4. The test boring locations are shown on Figure 2. Test hole elevations were interpreted from the USGS Renton Topographic Quadrangle. The Boring Logs are presented on Figures A-2 through A-4. An engineer from our office maintained a log of each test boring as it was drilled, classified the soil conditions encountered, and obtained representative soil samples. All soil samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System shown on Figure A-1. Representative soil samples were obtained from the test borings using sampling procedures outlined in ASTM Test Designation D-1586. The samples were placed in jars or tubes (ring samples) and taken to ( our laboratory for further examination and testing. The moisture content of each sample was measured and is reported on the Boring Logs. Plasticity characteristics of the fine-grained soils were determined by conducting Atterberg limits tests. A consolidation test was performed on a sample of the peat obtained during drilling of Boring B-2. Grain size analyses were performed on three of the samples. The results of the grain size analyses and consolidation test are presented as Figures A-5 through A-6. Consolidation test data are shown in Figure A-7. Project No.T-3063 MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER GRAPH TYPICAL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL SYMBOL ' GRAVELS Clean i�; C).'B Well-graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, little - Gravels i GW .Q•ta• or no fines. w (less than ; w-arra 41 Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little c N More than 5% fines) GP • : .1 or no fines. p •� 50% of coarse u7 m fraction is GM .3 • • . 0 Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures, non- ` 0 0 >> larger than No. Gravels j , J. plastic fines. z — 4 Sieve. with fines i GCii:-: I Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures, plastic O I � fines. C� O CV SANDS Clean Well-graded sands, gravelly sands, little or 'n Sands j SW no fines. 0 0 co z More than (less than •.<< Poorly-graded sands or gravelly sands, little = 0 50% of coarse ' 5% fines) SP } `<r?' ? or no fines. O 5 fraction is fl U o smaller than SM i Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures, non-plastic fines. No. 4 sieve. Sands !>' > y with fines SC K Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. • Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or Cn N SILTS AND CLAYS ML clayey fine sands or clayey silts with slight plasticity. • N --I CL / O c y Inorganic clays of low to medium.plasticity, gravelly ct .� Liquid uid limit is less than 50% clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. cc N E zo N OL i i i i i i i i i i i i i 1 i 1 Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity. Z o 1 Iii` iliif;i�i ICC � Z SILTS AND CLAYS MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine L sandy or silty soils, elastic. F w E- z i mliquid limit is greater than 50% CH / Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. T. E O H ! 1 1 1 1 1 I I Ir Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, y II IIIIIII I I I I I I I I I organic silts. . ,A' 'rl'h' 5,4 ti n A HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT ",4 Peat and other highly organic soils. DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS Standard Penetration J 2" OUTSIDE DIAMETER SPLIT w Density Resistance in Blows/Foot I SPOON SAMPLER cccc Very loose 04 2.4" INSIDE DIAMETER RING SAMPLER Loose 4-10 OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER ° Medium dense 10-30 P SAMPLER PUSHED o Dense 30-5050 * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED < Very denseWATER LEVEL (DATE) l WATER OBSERVATION STANDPIPE Standard Penetration C TORVANE READINGS, tsf Consistency Resistance in Blows/Foot qu PENETROMETER READING, tsf U Ver soft 0 2 W MOISTURE, percent of dry weight Y o Soft 2-4 pcf DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic foot Medium stiff 4-8 • LL LIQUID LIMIT, percent Stiff 8-16 pi PLASTIC INDEX " Very stiff 16-32 ' Hard >32 • N STANDARD PENETRATION, blows per. foot SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM :::' TERRA G.I. JOE'S iiiisippialli ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3063 Date 1/96 Figure A 1 . , , - Boring No. B-1 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/10/96 . Approximate Elev. 12 . Graph/ Relative Depth Ti (N) Water • USCS Soil Description Density E Blows/ Content (ft.) (5)3 foot (%) • Brown to gray silty fine to _ medium moist -,graed sand FILL cuttings ; I SM I!i;i' Very Dense T 50+ 10.4 FILL: Gray silty sand with few Y grayel, fine to medium grained, L. 5 • ii A , ,.,..,.,.. Dark brown, silty PEAT Medium Stiff 1... T T moist. 5 A A ILLJA A , amorphous, /moist to wet. LL=83 Medium Stiff 1 L 5 74.9 PL=44 I I rM11-11 P1=39 : I Gray-brown, clayey SILT, medium I plasticity, wet to saturated. / i I. il II w •-•I 10 1 _ Black to gray sandy SILT, Stiff L --, Bentonite slurry ML saturated, non plastic. L 8 41.3 added to hole to ill 1---.. 15 . control heave " Black SAND, as above. 4r. I 1 giiiiin .„...........,.........,... i r 309 T 11 . i UME:'4,:, Black SAND, as above but fine Medium Dense to medium grained. 1-20 r I 59 I 26.2 Black SAND, as above. Very Dense 1- Ifni iill 1 1[ 7 25 lit Brown-gray clayey SILT, low Soft I 3 47.6 PL=34 MH , plasticity, saturated. [ I E 30 1. LL=54 P1=20 a sm ii '...? ray si ty SAND,with clamshells,veryT 14 28.2 Medium Dense L •i,:. % ,...i,:- fine to fine-grained saturated., Test boring terminated at 34 feet. Groundwater encountered at 5 and 7 feet. Hole plugged with 1 bag of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings.• ! BORING LOG • TERRA G.I. JOE'S ti],...i:i:•i,,,:i::; :;'•••s..N. ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON -I.Iihrigli Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3063 1 Date 1/96 Figure A-2 • Boring No. B-2 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/10/96 Approximate Elev. 12 a) Graph/ Relative Depth C- (N) Water USCS Soil Description p L Blows/ Content Density (ft•) ,9 foot (%) y":::'{ • Dark gray sandy, gravel with silt. M SP/ • FILL cuttings,wet. /GP " Medium Dense L L i No recovery. I 24 !t-krr'n'n-0, 5 1 A A A A A A A. Dark brown PEAT, fibrous, Medium Stiff 1 j 7 204.4 eo 4.46 AAAAAAA wet. E Icy 2.47 AAArA A L 10 1 Iunit wt=67.8pcf SAAAAAAA I AAAAAAA Dark brown PEAT, as above r i A A A A A A n but saturated. Medium Stiff I -- ir.„:„..,„:„....:,,• 33 29.8 Black SAND with silt, fine- — [. SPDense SM grained, saturated. 7 15 mgamw >' ' u Black SAND, fine to medium 1 grained, saturated, 3 inch thick Medium Dense I: 1 17 34.3 "1<: k ff layer of brown, silty very fine- .": '.`'``...i.:: grained sand at 18 feet. LIL 20 SP/ E� I- •''• S M E' _ ; " I� I I�>c I Black SAND, as above but fine L' I 23.7 '.:: :»':_'; Very Dense L. i I 64 :; :,.;,< ,::.:: grained and without silty sand i 25 •r':r;:::<. ::;; layer. Liza; > : : Gray clayey SILT, low plasticity, Medium Stiff I' LL=46 saturated. I 6 45.6 PL=32 ML I j PI=14 I Gray clayey SILT, as above. Very Soft r 30 T LL=37 2 47.9 PL=28 ' -- -I P1=9 '• " Gray silty SAND with clamshells, i SM < . fine-grained, saturated. L-ag Medium Dense Test boring terminated at 36.5 feet. Groundwater encountered at 10 feet. Hole plugged with 1 bag of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings. • BORING LOG ..::.: :..: :<`` RENTON, TERRA G.I. JOE'S WASHINGTON ASSOCIATESiiiiiidioteisa Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3063 Date 1/96 Figure A-3 Boring No. B-3 Logged by: KPR Date: 1/10/96 - Approximate Elev. 12 a) Graph/' Water USCS Soil Description Relative Depth g glows/ Content cr)Density (ft.) o foot (%) i >liiii ' ` Brown, medium-grained sand I IBentonite slurry Y FILL cuttings with few gravel, I added to hole •??::*:}::<::g:::: : - to control heave <:::>v ::::::..:}c::::::: wet. >:>v: '<. FILL: As above but saturated. Medium Dense 18 16.9 w<:::>:°:gi fir:: FILL: As above but gray. Loose ::.::: :.:::: 4 27.0 I I II Dark brown organic SILT with peat• Soft 1. = • 1 1 I fibers,low plasticity,moist to wet.Gray-brown clayey SILT,low plasticity C OH I saturated,5 inch thick layer of . I I I fibrous peat at 8 feet;black,fine- Medium Stiff 1 5 69.1 LL=73 c grained.silty sand in sampler tip. PL=64 < _ 10 P1=9 r Dark gray, silty SAND,very L F `:•SM :i'<':: fine to fine-grained, saturated. Medium Dense L T 19 33.7 =:f • r c ` v.`. 'µ. Black SAND, with thin interbeds }t SP i:Ai of dark gray silty SAND, fine Medium Dense 33.2 :gg:z:N;>?�'g >y to medium rained saturated. 17 :;,;::<:{<:: ::>:, L20 i Dark brown-gray silty SAND, I '�S;� � Medium Dense :;?;,:;;: very fine-grained, saturated. gTilii «:}.::::R:;:.• i 16 31.5 :,,:}::<.::}>?:.: L��{�;•s•v#:<�}`•:{ Black SAND, fine to medium- Medium Dense .w.:, L,it:L";}kt;k:};*. grained, saturated. is• j'''': `` ":1 I Dense I 36 24.6 ?::gg> :; ::>:�:? Black SAND as above. Test boring terminated at 29 feet. Groundwater encountered-at 1.5 feet and 7 feet. Hole plugged with 1 bag of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings. • BORING LOG : TERRA FARWEST STEEL ^••.•. ���� ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3064 I Date 1/96 Figure A-4 • SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM N N Y COA CA NCO Nt Oi ll= \ _ .N- \\\\ \ O O O O O 0. NY M N O O O O O O iUU))1 i M7 hJ -0 OO O d M N �-- .- M Lf) M NO d- cp N O O O O O O O O O O O 90 ... r , — --- - -- - ---- -----' --- 10 • is % - I: ' i - -- - -- ---- --- _ —_--_ — n D 80 ---—-- --- -- - - - - - - - 2O 0.51k --_.IMMIIl.l o 0 XI m ai D Z 1,T.-. it. ____II � zI __I cn --- ` - - - -- - - __ -- - _ 50 cam!) � 50 rrl MI a. = 30 - II --�_- - --- - - _- - __z -I - _— -11 - -® 80 2 oW 20 --- _ --- -- -- -- • Z - --- - - - - �_11 I ---- rn z 0 - - - — _ _1OO O O 0 CD CD CD CD CD O QO CD ,t M N OD cD t M Cl CO CO NY M N OD cD d• M N IV O O O COCD d- r) N O O O O O Q O O O O O O D o m "' N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERSco o q q rn =Fri D COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE a COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES o cn z Key Boring or Depth USCS Description Moisture LL PL a7 Test Pit (ft.) Content (%) cn • B-1 2.5-4.0 SM silty SAND with gravel 0 B-1 12.5 ML sandy SILT SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM ` N O CO c0 d co N CV \\\\ \ O O O CD O 1. OOOOOOc0 d VI N Mu3 re) .1- CA •4- tD CVO O O O O c)iilvi id 100 : 0 fb 90 ---- -- - - - _ _ 10 s rn 80 ----^ --- -' ---- ---- 20 g- Cn 70 M ____ _________ __ \___ rrl - _ _ _ _ i0 70 - --- _- - - -----r- 30 m o Z - -- - ---- - - - - ----- -------- X/ m 50 - - - - - - -- -- --- --- - \\I - 50 c/) �7 --- --- ---- ---. ----- -- - -- ----- -- .•___.--- --_____ ----- .-___. ---- ----- - . - - ... ------ r, 40 --- - -- --- - -- -- - --- ---- -- - - -_ -_--- 60 CO — -- _..----------' --- -- ---- - --- -- -- - - --- - • - ---- -- - - .. C) 30 -- - -- -- - - - --- - -------- --- 70 m_ - - - - - G7z -I -- --- - --- - - ---- - - - - -. ----- ------ - - - -- - ---- - - - - --I 20 - -- - - - - --__ 80 a) -- ---- -- --------- - --- - - - - - -- - - --- - - --- w X) 0 ---- - --- m 10 - ---- - -- — 90 90 o z - -- -- -_ W. z G7(n 0 - , _ _100 . O 'O O O O O O O O CO cD � N) N °R (D at M N 00 c0 d- M N CO t0 M N O O O 0o c0 •h M N •O O O O O CR O O O O O O Dom M N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 0) =m a COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE z > COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES -I -< .19 o U) Z to Boring or Depth Moisture Key Test Pit (ft.) USCS Description Content (%) LL PL 1 • B-1 32.5 SM silty SAND 4111 S 4.50 1 _1 II 1 I f I l ' ;l I i I i i I I I I I L ( ( I I I I 1 � I 1 T I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I I I i ! I 1 1 1 4.00 I I I I I ` 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I i I 1 I 1 I I 7 I I ! I I . I I ( I I I_ . 1 II 1 i 1 I I 3.50 I 1 l I I i I I I 1 1 I 1 I i 1 I • I f ( 1 '� I I I 1 I I v I Icc 1 I I I I I I I I I I > I ( I 1 I I— I I I I I I I 1 3.00 I I I 1 I I I I i 1 i I r I I „ t 1 -- 1 I7 I I 1 II 2.50 I I 1 I . 1 . I IIIMINII I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I � 1 11 I I I I I I--- . 1 I I I I 1 I__ I" ' I (--1—1— 1 1 2.00 — I I I .1 .5 1 5 10 50 Pressure (tsf) Key Boring Depth USCS Soil Description C� eo 4n�enturgJ% oe0ns ty No. (ft.) Efe ore After (pcf) • B-2 7.0 PT PEAT 2.47 .024 4.46 204.4 126.8 22.1 Cc = Virgin Compression Index = Coefficient of Secondary Compression (at 0.83 tsf) eo = Inplace Void Ratio CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA TERRA G.I. JOE'S ,� `����ieurasASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON ® Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No.3063 Date 1/96 Figure A-7 HDA File No. 9557.00 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR G.I. JOES CITY OF IRENTON, WASHINGTON RECEIVED OCT 3 0 1996 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 320 Second Avenue South Kirkland, Washington 98033-6687 Phone: (206) 822-2525 Fax: (206) 822-8758 October 17, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: 1 Summary of Results- 2 Basin Summaries- 4 Runoff Curve Number and Time of Concentration: 7 Detention Basin Design Data: 12 Water Quality: 16 Drainage Area 1VIap: . , ; i I 2Q INTRODUCTION The following computations present the preliminary design of a storm water detention system for the proposed G.I. Joe retail store. The proposed 3.63 acre development is located on the south side of SW 34th Street, west of East Valley Highway in the City of Renton. EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS The project site is presently a vacant parcel comprised of Lot 1 of the Burlington Northern Railroad Binding Site Plan No. 014 - 92. The parcel-was filled approximately 18 years ago. The existing ground cover consists mainly of grasses in poor condition over the fill material. The site generally drains from east to west at an average slope of 0.25 percent. PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS Runoff from the parking, landscape and roof areas on the project site will be conveyed in a storm drain pipe system to two water quality basins adjacent to the south proetty line. The basins have been designed with a fiat bottom slope to promote water quality'through the ponding of storm Water runoff. The control structure has been designed to provide controlled release of excess storm water runoff from the project site. Control in the detention system wi!l be provided by the following set iiside a 54 inch diameter catch basin manhole: • A 4.5 inch diameter orifice set at an elevation of 12.70 for the 2 year storm • A 5.0 inch diameter orifice set at an elevation of 15.50 for the 10 year storm • A 4.0 inch diameter orifice set at an elevation o 15.80 for the 100 year storm • A 15 inch diameter overflow riser set at an elevation of 16.10 for all storm events assuming all orifices are plugged The control structure will discharge to a 15-inch storm drain pipe. The storm drain pipe will extend west to a connection with an existing 15-inch pipe constructed as part of the storm Train outfall system for the Far West Steel development. ' An existing 12-inch storm drain pipe continues approximately 390 feet west to an existing 60 inch storm drain pipe on the *es't'side of Lind Avenue. The storm drain pipe continues approximately 600 feet north, then 1?000.feet east to an outfall in Springbrook Creek. The proposed detention basin has been designed to maximize the volume available for storage of excess storm water runoff. As seen in the summary of results, the proposed facility provides significant additional storage capacity up to the 100 year storm for the developed site conditions. • SUMMARY OF RESULTS PROPOSED DETENTION SYSTEM Total Area of Project Site: 3.63 Acres Less Bypass Area: 0.00 Acres Total Site Area Tributary to Detention Basin: 3.63 Acres 1 YEAR STORM (WATER QUALITY) Peak Discharge, Pre Developed Conditions: NA cfs Peak Inflow to Basin: 0.33 cfs Proposed Release Rate: .0.17 cfs Design Water Surface Elevation: . . . . . . . . . . . . .- . . . . . . . . . . . . t 14,80 Approximate Volume of Storage Provided' 580 cf 2 YEAR STORM Peak Discharge, Pre Developed Conditions: 0.45 cfs Peak Inflow to Basin: 1.48 cfs Proposed Release Rate: 0.45 cfs Design Water Surface Elevation: .. . . . . 15.35 Approximate Volume of Storage Provide& 4200 cf 10 YEAR STORM Peak Discharge, Pre Developed Conditions: 1 0.88 cfs Peak Inflow to Basin: 2.27 cfs Proposed Release Rate: 0.88 cfs Design Water Surface Elevation: 15.73 Volume of Storage Provided: 6780 cf 100 XE A 11 STORM Peak Discharge, Pre Developed Conditions: 1.39 cfs Peak Inflow to Basin: 3.13 cfs Proposed Release Rate: - 1.39 cfs . Design Water Surface Elevation: _ . •. 16.09 Volume of Storage Provided: 9420 cf 2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS HISTORY OF HYDROGRAPH ACTIVITY LPOOL 1 "WETPOND SIZING" 7 1 TOTAL WETPOND 2 Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Dis PkStg OutQ hyd Volume WETPOND SIZING 0.00 0.33 TOTAL WETPOND 14.60 0.00 2 4963.12 cf LPOOL 2 "WETPOND ROUTING" 7. 1 WETPOND DETORF 3 Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Dis PkStg OutQ hyd Volume WETPOND ROUTING 0.00 0.33 WETPOND DETORF 14.80 0.17 3 576.33 cf LPOOL 1 "2 yr 24 hr storm" 18 1 WETPOND DETORF 2 Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Dis PkStg OutQ hyd Volume 2 yr 24 hr stm 0.45. 1.48 WETPOND DETORF 15.35 0.45 2 4197.02 cf LPOOL 2 "10 yr 24 hr storm". 19 3 WETPOND DETORF 4 Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Dis PkStg OutQ hyd Volume l0yr 24 hr szm 0.88 2.27 WETPOND DETORF 1 .73 0.88 4 , 6782.46 cf LPOOL 3 "100 yr 24 hr storm" 20 5 WETPOND DETORF 6 ' Description MatchQ PeakQ Sto Dis PkStg OutQ hyd Volume 100yr.24 hr stm 1.39 3.13 WETPOND DETORF 16.09 1.39 6 9420.05 cf • ' I • • 3 I • BASIN SU LMAMI S • 4 • • BASIN SUMMARIES • • PRE DEVELOPED CONDITIONS • BASIN ID: EX-2 NAME: PRE-DEV 2YR 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY ' TOTAL AREA 3.63 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00' cfs ' RAINFALL TYPE. .,. ..: USER1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION 1.95 inches AREA. . : 3.63 Acres - 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 89.00 0.00 , • • TC 55.00 min 0.00' -min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 • PEAK RATE: 0.45 cfs VOL: 0.30 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min • BASIN ID: EX-10 NAME: PRE-DEV 10YR 24HR • SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 3.63 Acres BASEFLOWS: ' 0.00 cfs • . RAINFALL TYPE. • ' USER1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION 2.85 inches AREA. . : 3.63 Acres . 0.00 Acres • • • TIME INTERVAL. ... . :" • 10.00 min , CN 89.00 : 0.00 tC 55..00. min , 0.00 min . ' s . - • • ABSTRACTION COEFF:. ' 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.88 cfs VOL: _ 0.53 AZ-ft TIME: 490 min . • BASIN ID: EX-100 NAME: PRE-DEV 100YR 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY - TOTAL AREA : 3.63 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs • RAINFALL 'iYPE : ' _ USER1 PERV • ' IIMP •PRECIPITATION • 3.85 inches AREA. . : 3.63 Acres q.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • -10.00 min CN 89.00 0.00 -- TC4 . . . : 55.00• min 0.00 min ' ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 • PEAK RATE: 1.39 cfs VOL: 0.81 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min • • • • I ' • • • • • 5 • BASIN SUMMARIES " POST DEVELOPED CONDITIONS BASIN ID: DEV-WQ NAME: POST-DEV 1 YR".STORM (WATER QUALITY) SBUH METHODOLOGY . . TOTAL AREA • 3.63 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs • RAINFALL TYPE • - USER1 PERV IMP • ' ' • PRECIPITATION • 0.64 inches AREA. . : 3.63 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN- • 97.00 ,. 0.00 • TC - 12.00 min 0.00 min • ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20, PEAK.RATE: 0.33 cfs VOL: 0.11 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min ' BASIN ID: DEV-2 NAME: POST-DEV 2YR 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • r .': 3..63 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs ' RAINFALL TYPE 7 USER1 PERV . . IMP ' PRECIPITATION. ... . : 1.95 inches AREA. . : 3.63 Acres 0.00 Acres .TIME INTERVAL. t. . : L "' 10.00 min CN 97.00 ' 0.00, TC • 12.00 min 0.00 min • ABSTRACTION COEFF: " 0• .20 • ' PEAK RATE: 1.48 cfs VOL: 0.49 Ac-ft TIME: 48Q min , BASIN ID: DEV=10 NAME: POST-DEV 10YR 24HR ' SBUH METHODOLOGY - • -TOTAL AREA ! ' 3.63 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs ' • . . RAINFALL TYPE: . . .-: USER1 ' PERV IMP PRECIPITATION, ' 2.85 inches AREA. . : 3.63 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL;. • 10.00 min CN 97.00 0.00 TC 12.00 min 0.00 mine ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 I • PEAK RATE:- 2.,27 cfs VOL: 0.76 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: DEV-100 ' NAME: POST-DEV 100YR 24HR SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA. . . • 3.63 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 'cfs RAINFALL TYPE - USER1 PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3.85 inches AREA. . : 3.63 Acres 0.00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 97.00 0.0-0 ' TC 12.00 min 0.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 • PEAK RATE: 3.13 cfs VOL: 1.06 Ac-ft TIME: ' 480 min - • 6 ' • • RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER TIME OF CONCENTRATION • • • 7 . • • DETENTION BASIN DESIGN DATA • • • 12 DETENTION BASIN DESIGN DATA STAGE STORAGE TABLES CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. CELL1 Description: STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 11.70 0.0000 0.0000 13.00. "3058 0.0702 14.30 6115 0.1404 15.60 9173 0.2106 11.80 235.20 0.0054 13.10 3293 0.0756 14.40 6350 0.1458 15.70 9408 0.2160 11.90 470.40 0:0108 13.20 3528 0.0810 . 14.50 • 6586 0.1512 15.80 9643 0.2214 12.00 705.60 0.0162 13.30 3763 0.0864 . 14.60 6821 0.1566 15.90 9878 0.2268 12.10 940.80 0.0216 13.40 • 3998 0.0918 14.70 /056 0.1620 16.00 10114 0.2322 12.20 1176 0.0270 13.50 4234 0.0972 14.80 7291 0.1674 16.10 10349 0.2376 12.30 1411 0.0324 13.60 4469 0.1026 14.90 7526 0.1728 16.20 10584 0.2430 12.40 1646 0.0378 13.70 4704 0.1080 15.00 7762 0.1782 16.30 10819 0.2484 12.50, 1882 0.0432 13.80 4939 0.1134 15.10 7997 0.1836 16.40 11054 0.2538 12.60 2117 0.0486 13.90 5174 0.1188 15.20 8232 0.1890 16.50 11290 0.2592 • 12.70 2352 0.0540 14.00 5410 0.1242 15.30 8467 0.1944 12.80 2587 0.0594 * 14.10 5645 0.1296 15.40 8702 0.1998- 12.90 2822 0.0648 14.20 5880 0.1350 15.50 8938 0.2052 TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID \To.. CELL? Description: j Length: 205. 00 ft.. . Width: 3 .30 ft. Side Slope 1 : 2 Side Slope 3: 2 Side Slope 2 : 2 . - Side Slope 4 : 2 Infiltration Rate: 0. 00 min/inch • STAGE <----STORAGE-i--> STAGE <----STORAdE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 13.70 0.0000 0.0000 14.50 . 810.55 b.0186 15.30 2171 0.0498 16.10 4097' 0.0941 13.80 71.821 0.0016 '14.60 950.18 0.0218 15.40 2380 0.0546 16.20 4378 0.1005 13.90 152.01 0.0035 14.70 1098 0.0252 15.50 2599 0.0597 16.30 4669 0.1072 14.00 240.59 0.0055 14.80 1255 0.0288 15.60 2826 0.0649 16.40 4969 0.1141 14.10 337.60 0.0078 14.90 . 1421 0.0326 15.70 3062 0.0703 16.50 5277 0.1212 14.20 443.07 0.0102 15.00 1595 0.0366 15.80 3307 0.0759 14.30 557.03 0.0128. 15.10 1778 0.0408 15.90 3561 0.0818 14.40 679.51 0.0156 15.20 1970 0.0452 16.00 3825 0.0878 TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. CELL3 Description: $ength: 65..00 ft. Width: 3 .30 ft. ide Slope 1 : 2 Side Slope 3 : 2 • ide Slope 2: 2 Side Slope 4: 2 Infiltration Rate: 0. 00 min/inch STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE'<----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> ift) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) T--cf--- --Ac-Ft- 13.70 0.0000 0.0000 14.50 261.75 0.0060 15.30 714.74 0.0164 16.10 1375 0.0316 13.80 22.821 0.0005 14.60 307.58 0.0071 15.40 785.63 0.0180 16.20 1473 0.0338 13.90 48.407 0.0011 14.70 356.43 0.0082 15.50 859.79 0.0197 16.30 1575 0.0362 ' 14.00 76.788 0.0018 14.80 408.33 0.0094 15.60 937.26 0.0215 16.40 1680 0.0386 14.10 108.00 0.0025 14.90 463.32 0.0106 15.70 1018 0.0234 16.50 1789 0.0411 14.20 142.07 0.0033 15.00 521.42 0.0120 15.80 1102 0.0253 14.30 179.03 0.0041 15.10 582.67 0.0134 15.90 1190 0.0273 14.40 218.91 0.0050 15.20 647.10 0.0149 16.00 1281 0.0294 13 CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. CELL4 Description: STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 11.70 0.0000 0.0000 13.00 2096 0.0481 14.30 4191 0.0962 15.60 6287 0.1443 11.80 161.20 0.0037 13.10 2257 0.0518 14.40 4352 0.0999 15.70 6448 0.1480 11.90 322.40 0.0074 13.20 2418 0.0555 14.50 4514 0.1036 15.80 6609 0.1517 12.00 483.60 0.0111 13.30 2579 0.0592 14.60 4675 0.1073 15.90 6770 0.1554 12.10 644.80 0.0148 - 13.40 2740 0.0629 14.70 4836 •0.1110 16.00 6932 0.1591 12.20 806.00 0.0185 13.50 2902 •0.0666 14.80 4997 0.1147 16.10 7093 0.1628 12.30 967.20 0.0222 13.60 3063 0.0703 14.90 5158 0.1184 16.20 7254 0.1665 12.40 1128 0.0259 13.70 3224 0.0740 15.00 5320 0.1221 16.30 7415 0.1702 12.50 1290 0.0296 13.80 3385 0.0777 15.10 5481 0.1258 16.40 7576 0.1739 12.60 ' 1451 0.0333 13.90 3546 0.0814 15.20 5642 0.1295 16.50 7738 0.1776 12.70 1612 0.0370 14.00 3708 0.0851 15.30 5803 0.1332 12.80 1773 0.0407 14.10 3869 0.0888 15.40 5964 0.1369 12.90 1934 0.0444 14.20 4030 0.0925 15.50 6126 0.1406 CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. TOTAL Description: • ' i • 1 STAGE <-I--STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE-- -> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft-• (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) -=-cf--- --Ac-Ft- - • (£t) ---cf--- - Ac=Ft- 11.70 0.0000 0,0000 13.00 5154 0.1183 14.30 11164 0.2563 15.60 1937d 0.4447 11.86 396.33 0.0091 13.10 5582 0.1281 14.40 11740 0.2695 15.70 20066 0.4606 - 11.90 792.67 0.0182 13.2b - 6010 0.1360 14:50 12317 0.2827 15.80 20761 0.4766 12.00 1189 0.0273 13.30 6438 0.1478 14.60 12893 0,2960 15.90 21457 0.4926 12.10 1586 0.0364 13.40 • 6866 0.1576 14.70 13469 0,3092 16.00 22152 0.5085 12.20 1982 0.0455 13.50 7295 0.1675 14,80 14045 0.3224 16.10 22940 0.5266 12.30 2379 0.0546 13.60 7723 0.1773 14.00 14622 0.3357 - 16.20 23729 0.5447 12.40 2775 0.0637 13.70 8151 0.1871 15.00 15168 0:3489 16.30 24517 0.5628 12.50 3172 0.0728 13.80 8579 0.1969 15.10 15893 0.3649 16.40 25306 0.5809 12.60 3568 0.0819 13.90 9007 0.2068 15.20 16589 0.3808 16.50 26094 0.5990 12.70 3965 0.0910 14.00 9435 0.2166 15.30 17284 0.3968 12.80 4361 0.1001 14.10 10011 0.2298 15.40 17980 0.4128 12.90 4758 0.1092 . 14.20 10588• 0.2431 15.50 18675 0.4287 CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. WETPOND - Description: STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- 14./0 0.0000 0.0000 15.20 3120 0.0716 15.70 6597 0.1514 16.20 10260 0.2355 14.80 576.33 0.0132 15.30 3815 0.0876 15.80 7292 0.1674 16.30 11048 06.2536 14.90 1153 0.0265 15.40 4511 0.1035 15.90 7988- 0.1834 16.40 11837 0.2717 15.00 1,729 0.0397 15.50 5206 0.1195 , 16.00 8683 0.1993 16.50 12625 0.2898 15.10 2424 0.0557 15.60 5901 0.1355 16.10 9471 0.2174 • 14 DETENTION BASIN DESIGN DATA STAGE DISCHARGE TABLES MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. DETORF Description: . Outlet Elev: 14.70 • Elev: 12.70 ft Orifice Diameter: 4 .517.6 in. Elev: 15.50 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 4 . 9805 in. Elev: 15. 80 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 3 . 8906 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 14.70 0.0000 15.10 0.3503 15.50 0.4954 15.90 1.1623 14.80 0.1751 15.20 0.3916 15.60 0.7383 16.00 1.2911, 14.90 0.2477 15.30 0.4290 15.70 0.8549 15.00 0.3033 I 15.40 0.4634 • 15.80 0.9496 RISER DISCHARGE ID No. RISER Description: • Riser piameter (in) : .15. 00 elev:. . 16..10. ft Weir Coeffi'Cient. .. . : 9.739 height: 16. 50 ft _ Orif Coefficient. . . : 3.782 incre2}i: 0 . 10 ft STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <=-DISCHARGE---> STAGE <-=DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE > (ft) ---cfs ' (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---dfs : (ft) ---cfs 16.10 0.0000 ' 16.20 0.3850 16.40 2.0004 16.50 3.0797 16.10 0T0000 16.30 1.0889 16.50 3.0797 • • • 15 . . . • • . . • - . . . . • .1 . I • • ' . . . . . . . • • WATER QUALITY • • • • . p • . . , . • . . 16 • WATER QUALITY BIOFILTRATION Section 1.2.3 Core Requirement No. 3 Reference: King County Surface Water Design Manual Threshold for Biofiltration: Maximum Allowable Impervious Area Subject to Vehicular Traffic, Aimp: 5,000 SF Proposed Condition: • Total Impervious Area Subject to Vehicular Traffic, Aimp: 79,694 SF Biofiltration is required. Because of the constraints on the site grading, the required minimum biofiltration surface area would not meet the design standards as outlined in the manual. In order to compensate for the loss of biofiltration surface area? the proposed wetponds have been en!arged.to pride additional lurface area and storage vluthe. Th oidume. 1e calculations for the proposed v4etpond are resented on the following page. . _ $ 17 WATER QUALITY SPECIAL WATER QUALITY CONTROLS Section 1.3.5 Special Requirement No. 5 As outlined in the introduction, the proposed detention system outfalls to an existing storm drain pipe system in Lind Avenue for eventual discharge into Springbrook Creek, a Class 2 stream. Since the project site proposes discharge within a one mile radius of a Class 2 Stream, a wetpond is required. The engineering plans propose a four cell combination wetpond - detention pond. Since the surface area of the proposed grass lined swale could not meet the requirements outlined in the SWM Manual, additional surface area and storage volume has been proposed for the wetponds. As shown in the following calculations, the proposed wet ponds provide over four times the required wetpond surface area and over two time the required wetpond storage volume. This additional surface area and storage volume is intended to compensate for the limited surface area in the proposed grass lined Swale. Wetpond Surface Area . Impervious Area, Airnp• 135,645 sf On Site Area Subject to Vehicular Trafic: '9,694 sf On Site Buildings: 55,95,1 sf Required Water Quality Surface Area, Awq: 1,356 sf Awq = One Percent of Impervious Area Proposed Water Quality Surface Area (cell 1 + cell 4), Apwq: 3,964 sf Ratio of Proposed Water Quality Surface Area to Required Quality Water Surface Area: . . 3:1 Wetpond Dead Storage Volume . Total Drainage Area Tributary to Wetpond, A. 3 63 Acres Required Volume, Vwq: 4,963 cf Vwq = Total Volume of Runoff from the Mean Annual Storm Proposed Storage Volume (cell 1 + cell 4), Vpwq• 11,892 cf Ratio of Proposed Storage Volume to Required Storage Volume: 5 { 2.4:1 • 18 • r WATER QUALITY • COALESCING PLATE OIL/WATER SEPARATORS Section 1.3.6 Special Requirement No. 6 Threshold for Coalescing Plate Oil/Water Separators Five Acres Miniumum Impervious Surface Area subject to: Vehicular Traffic: 5 00 Acres or Vehicle Trips Per Day: 2,500 Trips or Heavy Equipment Use, Storage or Maintenance; 0 9 • proposed C{�nditon: Total Impervious Area Subject to Vehicular Traffic. 1 83 Apres Proposed Number of Vehicle Trips Per Da : 1 T ; 9 Trips See Traffic Impact Analysis for the roposed project (copy attached) _ , Heavy Equipment Use, Storage or Mainten ce: ; ; 1. Yes? 19 • + ♦Aral s:crin:amtr•�cvr •i9rr• s ra�wr,.; 4:.: •10: r.Gvir: }N:i;c4gr iA2'�E% :sc:Nu`tr.:a:rs o ,d., ovr,••• ..aucw••/S>�: •r .e??r.. y .,.. >� GF.�i::?°A%xd'.�+lb..'.::ix ''"..°�n' 2 }.atoas N. s.? h:/. t?S:rd+ irrbr.�r Ma.cnw:. :;:a �riv..ust �rct^radnc:rtir•. .:ccor.< yT :1 �....t MERE • Project Name f Project Address Contact Person Address Phone Number Permit Number Project Description Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential 0 ITE Trip Generation Manual 0 Retail 0 Traffic Study 0 Non-retail 0 Other Calculation: - • Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by: Date: Account Number: p)0. 70. OO.aoo Date of Payment **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 10/30/96 13 :35 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9605868 Amount : 2, 007 . 04 10/30/96 13 :35 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #10824 GI JOES Init : GC Project #: LUA96-136 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Location: SW CORNER E. VALLEY HWY @ SW 34TH ST Total Fees: 2, 007. 04 This Payment 2, 007. 04 Total ALL Pmts : 2, 007 . 04 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 7 . 04 999 . 999 . 99 . 99 . 9999 Unknown Fee Item 500. 00 -lb be_C.we- -(cam