Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWWP2702291/-If= NI L-06; 4 T/oN � -im �' U�� �o•r-I��N C cNo/�'vcorl�,%����i� / A A A r r N e ; T/v ��bl,�/Sl6Ns /P 54-f:F c O /S60 &7 ?aOR 504 !)F (W)015- tit # 7xo FOX )- C(/)MP7T 'IWZ) �j# i2T /U'/G //Sr(� ON CO �' C fio�' C /77 o !' NT- �01-0 /!�F //v O 7is`� s� �Ui17` s �'o�77a�v O 4' cvvA,� P%1K4,TIA 47�N%7d14,4 76 �,��� ?,� l ,6sc--e57S , Cow /O*t p 7 q5 5AI-4-- c O -Z-Loo - 'C fl L �o�s USA O1= r/�i'T Uiy lIU i"0� S r�r ulw� W W W W W W ___ tN 0 'A 000 of O 0 .� fY r a or cr er C1 C CI � Q 44 04 n 4'R Earl Clymer, Mayor January 15, 1992 Mark Dallas METRO 821 Second Avenue South - MS 122 Seattle, WA 98104 - 1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: INTERIM RELOCATION OF METRO CRTL Dear Mr. Dallas: Please find attached the Plan Review Section and Parks Department comments for this project. Please address these comments and resubmit to me for final review and approval. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 277-6212. VRfy truly YpGrs, David (M. �firisteKsen Wastewater Utility Engineer D:92-038:DMC:ps Enclosures 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washinmon 99055 METRO INTERIM CRTL RELOCATION Review Comments PLAN REVIEW 12/23/91 1) This appears to include ±330' of continuous jacking or auguring. The length of this will preclude the use of certain construction methodologies. Applicant should (if they have not already) make sure that proposed construction technique is feasible for this proposal. 2) Crossing permits, approvals are needed from City of Renton, BNRR, and WSDOT. City of Renton construction permit needed for R-O-W work. 3) Profile drawing must show all City of Renton utilities, including sewer, water, and storm lines. 4) Plan drawings must show all City of Renton utilities, including sewer, storm, and water lines. 5) Provide detail drawings of jacking pits. 6) Include information on restoration of City of Renton paved surfaces that will be damaged during interceptor installation. 7) Sheet piling will be needed to protect roadway at the 12' x 30' jacking pit. 8) Plans/specifications must address barricades and public safety requirements. 9) Provide more detail on connections into existing interceptors. Construction plans/details and a sequence of operation for this work would be helpful. 10) Section numbers should be labeled on drawings. 1 1) Call out what will be done with by-passed section of the Cedar River trunk. 12) Metro will need an easement through Cedar River Park. Show easement on drawings. 13) Drawings need P.E. stamp. D:92-038a:GAZ:DMC:ps DATE: TO: FROM CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM December 19, 1991 David Christensen, Utility Systems Sam Chastain, Parks & Recreation Director i DEC 19 1991 CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept SUBJECT: Metro Sewer Line - Relocate Cedar River Park and Liberty Park I have attached comments from my staff regarding the Metro sewer project in Cedar River Park and Liberty Park. The plans indicated the alignment of the sewer line only with no technical specifications regarding the work that the Parks Department would find of most interest, and I'm sure will be addressed later in further detail. When you have the technical specifications and the time frame for the work to be performed, our department would like the opportunity to review and submit our input. Scheduling will be a very important issue for this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at extension 2568. SC:wr c: Jim Shepherd Randy Berg Attachments SEWERCLP PW MEMORANDUM TO: Sam FROM: Randy RE: Metro work in Liberty and Cedar River Parks DATE: Dec.9,1991 I've reviewed the drawings metro submitted and find that the work is just as we discussed with metro. The only major impacts on the parks is the placement of two new manholes, which should not be a problem at the proposed locations. The plans do not address any of the real concerns we have, namely the timing and impacts of the construction process itself. Before approving this project we should have a firm construction schedule. The timing of this project will determine the actual impact on parks operations. The plans do not show how the excavation spoils will be stored during construction. Given the size and the depth of the excavation, the location of the dirt and the timing of when the dirt will be removed and when it will be replaced is very important when assessing impacts on the Parks. Also of importance is size and time of use of the staging area which I assume is still planned for the Henry Moses Pool parking lot. We don't know how much of this lot they will require, or for how long they will be using it. It would also be nice if we saw something in the plans which addresses Park user safety. With the size and depth of these holes there is a fairly high potential for injury, particularly for kids who will naturally be drawn to the site of the work to play in the fresh dirt. Lastly, I still do not know if the back road into Cedar River Park will be closed during construction or will remain open. It is probable that this road will be closed for some of the time, but we don't know when or for how long. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: December 3, 1991 TO: Don Erickson FROM: Paul Forsander SUBJECT: Shoreline Exemption for Cedar River Sewer Trunk Relocation Project Phase I Metro is proposing to relocate a portion of the Cedar River Trunk between the Renton Community Center, SR 405 and Liberty Park. To resolve the question of whether this project would need a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, Dave Christensen and I measured the distance between the proposed sewer construction and the ordinary high water line of the Cedar River on December 2, 1991. Based on our measurements, the project is 208 feet from ordinary high water, and thus does not require a Shoreline Permit. cc: Dave Christensen, Waste Water Utility i January 17, 1992 Y75 To: Marc Dallas - 122 From: Roger Browne - 117 Subject: Cedar River Trunk Relncatinn - hasP T Renton Plan Review Comments In order, my reply is as follows: 1. Jacking methodologies considered and the project had no bidding problems. 2. Crossing permits in hand. Please obtain Renton construction permit or details for contract to obtain. 3. Done, based upon information provided by Renton. 4. Done, based upon information provided by Renton. 5. Details for jacking pits will be up to Contractor method, however, information copies will be provided when available (submittal) . 6. Restoration per attached specification and drawings. 7. Adequate protection for the roadway will be required during contractor submission of jacking pit design and details. 8. Public safety/protection of work/barricades in specifications attached. 9. In part, sequencing will be contractor responsibility. Updated plans show end -product. Contractor will undoubtedly sequence its construction from downstream, and its manhole connections from downstream to upstream thereafter. 10. Done. 11. Done (Filled with grout, see specs also. 12. Marked in yellow on sheet c-1 attached, final easement to be determined by survey and legal description of as -built location. Wd��IT7ETRO • Old Fort Lawton Tunnel Inspection Results September 10, 1991 Page Two 13. Done. In reference to Parks comments: Proposed staging is shown on sheet c-1. Have we obtained permission for use yet? Need for duration of work, say February 20th to May 15th. Spoils will be stored alongside trench, away from river. Timing is that this part of the work will probably be Late March/Early April. See comments re: jobsite safety in Sections 01063, 01500 The back road into Cedar Park will likely be closed for part of the time, particularly during crossing! Since it has to be open for contractor use otherwise, it could be made available to Community Center users. A schedule will be provided by the Contractor. RB:rb DATE: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM February 26, 1992 TO: Dick Anderson Ron Olsen Lys Hornsby Dave Christensen Mike Benoit Clint Morgan pF R g peP�. E���reeC� FROM: Gregg Zimmerman (,-'> SUBJECT: METRO CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMIT The following issues must be resolved to issue a construction permit for this project: PERMIT CONDITIONS: (To be written into permit) 1) Erosion control: In addition to requirements to spec 01560-3.05, stabilize trench spoils with tarp, visqueen, spread straw, etc. Site restoration must include sodding or seeding of disturbed areas. 2) Submit design of jacking pit and sheet piling to City of Renton for review and approval. 3) Trench backfill in City streets and Park paved areas should be crushed rock compacted to 95% density (Class E1, per spec 02200-3.02) 4) Project must comply with attached requirements concerning protection of the City's drinking water aquifer. REQUIREMENTS TO OBTAIN PERMIT: 1) Fill out and submit traffic control plan. 2) Provide permit bond for restoration of City R-O-W and Park property. Metro Cedar River Trunk Relocation Requirements Page 2 PROVIDE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1) Submit construction schedule. 2) Submit proposed construction staging area. 3) Show where proposed stockpiles will be. 4) Will work be completed by May, when Parks become busy? fio-AA dr 6-9-� D:92-159:GZ:ps A mAR 11 "92 14 METRO ENJJ;R. SERVICES 206E841710 " -" METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle P. Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave_ 0 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 11A 1 ' QQ2 � r%r' FACSIMILE T RENTOy „ t NBMISSiON COVER SHEET SIN 0Fr' 'Dept. E.0nee DATE SENT: TRANSMITTED TO: / �N-LQgr-j^ aeel w TRANSMITTED FROM: (-g kj (Name) l� 5G (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: (206) 684-1710 W (Mail Stop) 7 NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: (Including Cover Sheet) ..._.._ FOR INTERNAL STAFF USE ONLY: PROJECT: _ L �' �lrn ^ %�� (/r=1 �✓r�� rl� ARMS/TASK NO.: SUBJECT: NOTES: f-I f r (P'S p�•�5 -- To: Dave Christiansen Frorn: Roger Browne Construction Permit conditions evaluated! For Conditions 1 - 4, will comply. If possible, consider allowing pit run under paved park area @ 90% compaction, a one foot lift of crushed rock immediately under pavement @ 95% compaction. Requirements to obtain permit: 1. Traffic control plan to be delivered. Renton named as additional insured, please seek Metro recompense beyond that for restoration. Informational items: 1. Construction schedule to be delivered. 2. Staging to be delivered. 3. ditto stockpile 4 jacking pit end. Remainder along trench as previously discussed. 4. See schedule. May 25th projected for restoration completion. (could have been earlier with permits...) Aquifer Protection permit conditions: A-1: Propose the following alternate conditions: Mobile equipment to be moved to a paved area for refueling, absorbent materials on -hand, all due care exercised. Boring/.Jacking equipment to be refueled in -place, with due care and clean-up materials available, Controlled -density fill under jacking machine will facilitate the trapping of any spilled fluids. Requirement for bibbing is unclear. If you want whenever equipment is in zone, operating or not, it's about $13,000 1 didn't plan for... (Let me know if you really need it). A-2: Foundation per se of the jacking pit is not an aquifer protection issue; we will install per submitted plan unless otherwise advised. To remove spoils, a pit would be dug which would also serve as a sump. Only one slab or CDF pad will be poured, not two. With regard to chemical spill controls, we will comply as written. (An extra pad would cost about $18,000.) A-3: We expect to hold fine and grade. We propose to inspect line for breaks in the vicinity of the jacked crossing to ensure that it is not breached. If we do break open or bore through the pipe, Metro's contractor will repair the damage. 11 ' 92 1 4 - c _ SERVICES 2066641710 ppppp- A-4: We propose the use of pressure -treated lumber in lieu of plastic mated insulators. (Otherwise it's an extra $23,500.) A-5: Shoring plan to be delivered. B-1. Agreed. B-2: Agreed. \1 B-3: It's not complex enough for a written plan. Recommend this be passed verbally � to inspectors in field as the work develops. C-AH except 5: Agreed. C-5: Per discussion at the precon, its a structural requirement from WSDOT, we'd like to stay with grout. (ps. contractor quote for this extra is $15,935. Construction activity standards: E-1:5 Agreed, E-6 and E-7: Per discussion above. E-S: Of course. Dave, let me know what other information I can provide, IT arrange to have all the submittals there early thurs morning, Thanks. Roger Browne. EZ 14 MAPS AND TRANSPORTATION Z U S WEST Direct I b b 4RNb Halley ..a tle i ` f _AL s p SEWARDP t r 7PARKsso SLAKEMARINE S1ATE MARINE PARK raAtwn elf d W Blade / E s *167 SE bland GO. w s a.at Point L-1—w sw i sPointOr 'Brans Paintf W Point i a dW t Aee t i Isnldele 1d r s1worth Delphi° MAP 3 `i ` w b Old y i b b . it s.ge•+er Point 4 sw 11 M t i e< rn z ❑ N 509 Y a s t i N / S /21M t a e 167 S fYrh r ' i r� � I 4 t 9 m S99 8, lsngsfw Rd t s Jet St • b n /Inter C'sa pe y 5 t h st N v 0 Pelat a _ i h b g i e7 516 i L p 50 2 3b ;A st Pout Beale SW fee f i Isom wy /a1M f ism at �69 Paint / ��^ii t b � A h St .Er 1 b 515 a loom r SEA-TAC sw fern st 7bm nee �' ` e INT,L d t7 I a y N Point aw„ RPORT 5 < e ; r^ ; y r a /7erh sr S� I � s •+ vl V0 e � b q a teoM at u 1rww 1ath ti Normans: b ` d /erhdr I t 3 Pa. 1 ate2nddt b te1 d 1 8 2QQrh St 167 I sw 204th st Poet H" J drh st b b 99 d Nelson Rd b . < < C S09 yt / £ 82 ehsr _ O KIT CO. Vsw22rhsr - 2p ✓l b - It a t :1n a F PIERCE CO./= r 3 t rY m $ d 516 Y Y dW 2MM dr � dW 210M dt Robinson PPointL 8 24ph st Qn j S amen 3t fi 4 \ Aep 7 i d ;o' a Rd = e, aSt s SE 2181 sl Point SALTWATER Aft e° wire sr i d r 5 51A SE aefh STATE PARKit r s t p 1 2 miles It rl 2sot c N t l I, $09 a Scale 1 Inch = 2.2 miles `r Construction of streets and 4 277tn st 1 S roads may be In progress In �ay4e b A certain areas. an b 16T "t Z y W 1 S 218th st 4 �� Point V1 S 2eeth sr J7fh st Nw e \ Point iC \ Daleo < \ pe ' Neill Point , DASH POINT OesA Pam rh St "Ad ME STATE PARK o eA P 509 " A a St NW tM a Con inuation fro ap 4 a sJ,2th sr NE W eoofh elf W 11 320t N 3 Stanrdge 4 a Jean r o g fat A sr Hill \ : i m Auto sr st y� b 164 e = /JYnd a i 9d & 164 yi 169 8f Qa.N, SW Jaeth t 1 2" st SE g = p S JeOtA St b rh sr 3 v : 410 : b J f F9 00 To Mt Reinl r } cE`�cQ ��� e # CFaF u� d ItL, National Par A $ O d JI KING COUNTY i • 5 s It 165 FAIRGROUNDS- SESHrhsf . ,-ACOM,ti TO 161 167 Erh CQgABV° �n P'n"dclB ` T o To Puyallu Preity° o South Prairie hAo pay 3 p KH2 LNUiNttKiNU ILL No.2Ub-8b9-77b9 Feb 21,92 13:30 No.001 P.02 February 21, 1992 Ms. Lys Hornsby City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 980 Subject: Mitigation Conditions for Protecting the Aquifer During Construction of the Cedar River Trunk Relocation Dear Lys: Special requirements must be addressed before a permit can be issued for the Relocation of the Cedar River Trunk. The construction plans submitted by METRO must document that the project will not impact the quantity or quality of groundwater in the aquifer either on a short or long term basis. Specific concerns addressed in this letter are regarding construction procedures that will be implemented during the temporary bypass of this trunk line. Potential sewage spills during the temporary bypass and tie-in to the future line, and fuel, oil, and chemical spills during construction represent the main threats to the aquifer. The critical areas or site locations posing the greatest risk to the aquifer are the two temporary bypass locations and the jacking pit. The following items represent our concerns and recommendations regarding these critical areas: A. JACKING PIT 1. Fuel, oil, hydraulic -fluid and other chemical spills and leaks from jacking machinery must be kept to a minimum and contained within the jacking pit. Section E, Construction Activity Standards, from the Aquifer Protection Ordinance must be adhered to by the contractor. No variances from this ordinance should be allowed. It should be clarified at the pre -construction meeting that both this ordinance and the contract specifications Section 01560, Environmental Controls, will be strictly enforced by the inspector. 2. To facilitate containment of both chemical spills and water build-up in the pit from rainfall, groundwater seepage, and water flowing from the casing, a 1 foot thick, High Density Fill (HDF) pad is recommended for the bottom of the pit. The jacking pit should be over excavated and quarry spalls should be used to 1 RH2 ENGINEERING lEL No.206-869-�769 Feb 21,92 13:30 No.001 P.03 Y- -., - assure a solid foundation. The HDF pad should be sloped towards a sump and have a 12 inch high perimeter wall to act as free board. An adequately sized sump pump shall be used to discharge water from the jacking pit directly to the METRO sewer. 3. It is critical that deviations in line and grade of the casing pipe are not allowed. The plans show a 36 inch storm drain under I-405 at approximately Station 180 (with a clearance of approximately 12 inches between its invert and the top of the 60 inch casing). Exact location of this 36 inch storm drain should be verified by the contractor before casing passes this section. The Plan Specifications Section 02150, Jacked Casings (Part 3 - E), allows the contractor to "deviate to the extent that the carrier pipe can be shifted within the casing to compensate for deviation". This would allow for deviation of 15 inches, which in this case would be too much. 4. There are several utilities, specifically gas and water, in the jacking pit vicinity which may need to be rerouted. Care must be taken when working around these lines. 5. Creosoted, greased timber is not acceptable material for carrier pipe skids. Plastic casing insulators are recommended (PIS Industries Model PE or equal), 6. The volume of excavated material during casing installation should be carefully monitored to ensure that the proportional amount of material is removed and that voids and potential cave-ins are prevented. 7. We recommend that a monitoring well be installed down gradient from the lacking pit arid­t4at a monitoring plaice submitte ,y the contractor, set up "e City to enstiire-that any potential contamination is detected early. - B. TEMPORARY BYPASSES AND CONNECTION TO THE NEW LINE 1. Bypassing of the existing line during connection at Manhole R10-6 and at Manhole R10-6C which would involve pumping out and around these manholes should be kept to a minimum. The connection of the new line to Manhole R 10-6 should be via a core drilled connection while flow is re-routed inside the manhole by the sand bags, or with flexible bypass hoses. A HDF pad similar to that used at the jacking pit should be installed at both Manhole R10-6 and at the saddle Manhole R10-6C. The contractor shall be required to maintain sufficient equipment and materials to assure continuous and successful dewatering operations and containment of potential spills during both connection operations. 2. Manhole R10-8 can be used as a wet well to pump sewage from during the connection of Manhole R10-6C, The connection at Manhole R10-6C should not DRAFT be allowed until Manhole R10-6 has been completed (including channeling). During this procedure, preventing backups into the existing system is critical. Monitoring upstream conditions from Manhole R10-8 and of the 8 inch sewer manhole R 10-613 should be required. 3. A Bypass/tie-in Plan must be submitted by the contractor prior to construction (the City may want to develop its own Bypass/tie-in Plan, which the contractor must follow). This plan should be submitted along with the dewatering plan as required by METRO Specification Section 02140 Dewatering. C. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS 1. Proper abandonment of the existing reinforced concrete pipe, sewer, and manholes should involve flushing before grouting. 2. The contractor should be informed that the cleanout for the 8 inch line coming from the fluoridation building must be relocated. 3. Backup equipment and sump truck should be required to be on site during the crucial bypass operations. If you have any further concerns or questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, RH2 ENGINEERING, P.S. A011 r�� d Geoff Dillard Staff Engineer 3 DRAFT r '• I Y OF RENTON iRFCCs1[ P CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 6 1992 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: February 25, 1992 TO: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: Dan Clements D" RE: Cedar River Sewer Bond This correspondence will follow-up on your request for a review of the proposed bond form for use with Metro re -aligning the sewer through the Cedar River Park. I am not sure what we are asking Metro and their contractors to guarantee. If we wish to tap an account for possible dollars, I would suggest that a right-of-way bond from the surety is not the instrument to do this. It would seem much more advisable to have Metro, rather than the contractor, guarantee to indemnify the City, and compensate us for any damages that are caused by their contractors. Metro is much stronger financially then their contractors, and there would be many fewer hoops to jump through to collect funds. If we can narrow what possible items we are asking them to guarantee, the exact form of the agreement would be much easier to complete. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to give me a call. DC/csk cc: Larry Warren cAcoresp\metrobnd FEB-21-1992 10:26 FROM RELIANCE '=URETTC 0$-120$-$M RELIANCE SURETY COMPANY Facsimile Transmission r 0 F H O M TO le; 11-01 Woo � / r^ ' . fl u � � �7 .5't-r 74 �f� t'-� Q � ke4 0a T�'r) t C o� G 92352 1-= P.C11 Cm' of �RECE ON ^_ FEB 2 1 1992 na,0-n� a-;.7 � of FEB-21-1992 10:2E FROM RELIANCE SURETY TO 92352513 P.02 THE COUNTY OF KING BOND TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY RIGHTS -OF -WAY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we and As principal, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of , authorized to do, and doing business as a surety company in the State of Washington, as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the County of King, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, in the penal sum of Dollars, gold coin of the United States, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we firmly bind ourselves, our and each of our heirs, executors administrators, and assigns, jointly and severally by these presents. Sealed with our seals and dated this day of 19 . The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that, Whereas, the above named principal has applied for a permit to do certain work on a King County roadway, street, alley, Avenue or other public place known as during a period ending on the day of 19 . NOW THEREFORE, if the above named principal shall indemnify and save harmless the County of King, from all claims, actions or damages of every kind and description which may accrue as a result of opening and/or work- ing upon any roadway, street, alley, Avenue or other public place, by him or those in his employ, in installing or making connections with any pub- lic or private sewer or water system, or any other purpose or object what- ever, and that he will replace and restore such roadwy, street, alley, avenue or other public place to as good a state or condition as at the time of the commencement of said work, and maintain the same in good order to the decided satisfaction of the County Road Engineer, and that he will comply with all the provisions of his or their franchise or permit, and all resolutions or instruments relating thereto, then this obligation to be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Principal By Surety CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 10, 1992 TO: Dick Anderson Gregg Zimmerman Ron Olsen Ray Sled Lys Hornsby Steve Pinkham FROM: Dave Christensen (X-6212) SUBJECT: METRO INTERIM RELOCATION OF CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE I have scheduled a meeting on Thursday, March 12, 1992 at 1:30 PM in the small third floor conference room. The purpose of this meeting is to quantify and qualify inspection related issues as well as establish the proper coordination for City response for closure of the wells both in an emergency and for normal construction activities. D:92-188:DMC:ps SENT DY:GOLDER ASSOC. INC. 09-20-91 09:47AM 2068025490� 206 235 2541 # 1 Golder Associates lncAodmond, WA Fax Cover Sheet Date: <dr 20 1 q q, j To: Name UTy of 4wm'i 2 3 S - 2 -g Fax Phone # From: 577—:�'Cu > `NT GOLOC& A S S aG / AILS Zia, Name Cornparly I Number of pages Including cover: 2 t-ces-rip8o-�k«.E H IN A PAe-KtN4o lZir u_ r-007' -n LV iTP LAnJ6 - Any questions about this fax, please contact Golder Associates Inc. Please ask the receptionist for assistance. (206) 883-0777 Our Machine FAX # (206) 882-5498 (206) 882-1 W 17 Hard copy to follow Golder Associates Inc. • 4104 148th Avenue N.E., Redmond (Seatt4), Washington, U.S.A. 98052 Tel. (206) 893.0777 Facsimile (206) 882.5498 • Easylink 62901113 Offices in Canada • United Stales • United Kingdom • Katy - Swan - Germany • Australia SENT DY:GOLDER ASSOC. INC 09-20-91 09:47AM 2060025490a 206 235 2541 # 2 VOY s•u s•ouNos aIto N. 1 ti.t Lot A sE, 5 Wes LIBERTY RK---' --; �' �Y `; .L` Ceda R _• .� ��'„ �r,,�;. r ��''�:.�•° I Pork 14 / f ; , f Cedar River y. '> _ \ 15�L.i:stEr— \�'A\ rt'Qv t 'Lot 7' f. Y 3RD tl EP it .q' IYiER00lE WRP LI EXPLANATION 14 & Proposed boring A Q Alternate Boring _0— Existing Trunk Sewer and Manholes 300. 4W FEET 1� FIGURE 5 ALTERNATE ROUTE SITE PLAN HNTBUETRO SEWERVRENTON • rnlrior OCSnelatas PP4JECTNO. 9913-1101LCM WKAwnlayry. IMaII r•I— - I i L L 0 0 L//Te T r o a c; jA. C} `C �' /7 11 , %/c� z� ,o ems/ fee lo GPP 601-64. e 7,04- ev ProUi�� e(e /r i/ �1��°l pI k c&Je POD « 01-770( UJ� 7 )�i Pe7L j/ ` j�/ ,�.e hie /U oAe c7� t �', ' >r 'ate � Ir�' ,r � J 6�1 PA W W W W W W sxa aoo Sao N _Na JJ, vaa N N N N N N a l50 ;� 7 --q � w bear w, // ,� � �� � /n� 7pc penlj Rte C -t-e4lf fT dl Pe-d G7,*7 e,?, ) c- 1�/ G / _ tE ,'4���,,:-��Ie mee-d " METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 October 30, 1991 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Paul Forsander City of Renton Planning Dept. OCT 3 1 1991 200 Mill Ave. S Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED Dear Mr. Forsander: The SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance and checklist on Metro's Cedar River Sewer Trunk Relocation Project Phase I is enclosed as required under WAC 197-11-340. If you have any questions, please contact me at 684-1174. Sincerely, Tim Goon Environmental Compliance and Right of Way Division Enclosures ""METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) CEDAR RIVER SEWER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT PHASE I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project involves the abandonment, relocation and installation of sanitary sewer line. Approximately 560 feet of 42 inch sewer line would be abandoned and replaced with an estimated 525 feet of 42 inch diameter lined ductile iron pipe and approximately 350 feet of 60 inch diameter pipe casing. Relocation of this segment of Metro's Cedar River Trunk is being undertaken in response to Interstate 405 roadway improvements. Construction methods anticipated are open cut and jacking. Construction would occur within the City of Renton's Cedar River and Liberty Parks. Construction is anticipated to begin in early 1992 and last for approximately ten weeks. PROPONENT: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: The proposed alignment begins near the City of Renton's Community Center located in Cedar River Park and extends to the west. The west terminus is located to the north of the bath house located in the City of Renton's Liberty Park. LEAD AGENCY: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO) The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under WAC 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. X This DNS is issued under 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by NOVEMBER 15, 1991. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Gregory M. Bush POSITION/TITLE: Manager/Environmental Compliance and Right of Way Division TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 684-1164 ADDRESS: 821 Second Avenue M.S. 120, Seattle, Washington 98104 DATE: October 31, 1991 SIGNATURE: k You may appeal this determination to Richard K. Sandaas, Executive Director, at Metro - 821 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington, 98104. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Tim Goon at 684-1174 regarding the SEPA appeals procedures. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cedar River Trunk Relocation Phase I 2. Name of applicant: Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Metro 821 Second Avenue, MS 120 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Contact: Tim Goon, Telephone: (206) 684-1174 4. Date checklist prepared: October 21, 1991 5. Agency requesting checklist: Metro 6. Proposed timing or schedule: Proposed project plans will be submitted to permitting agencies in mid November. Conditional upon the receipt of necessary permits and approvals, construction is anticipated to begin in early 1992, and last approximately ten weeks. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? The proposed project is a temporary rerouting of approximately 560 feet of existing 42 inch sanitary sewer trunk line. In the future, Metro intends to identify alternatives with the City of Renton which would address modifications to the Cedar River Trunk Sewer to provide increased protection for the City of Renton's municipal water wells PW1, PW2 and PW3. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. The Washington Department of Transportation (WDOT) is currently making improvements to Interstate 405 through the Renton area. WDOT work would affect the integrity of the existing trunk line in the vicinity of the I-405 Cedar River crossing. That portion of the trunk line addressed in this proposal must be relocated prior to WDOT work scheduled to begin in May 1992. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The following permits or approvals are anticipated: City of Renton Street Use Permit City of Renton Parks Department Approval Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Notice of Construction Washington Department of Transportation Project Design Approval A City of Renton Shoreline Permit may be needed. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead Agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description). Metro proposes to replace and reroute approximately 560 feet of 42 inch sewer trunk line. The trunk line would be realigned to avoid anticipated I-405 construction improvements. The existing line would be replaced with 42 inch diameter ductile iron pipe. That portion of the proposed pipe under I-405 to the west terminus would be encased within a 60 inch pipe using jacking as the method of construction. Open cut would be used where the trunk line is not jacked. That portion of the existing trunk being replaced would be abandoned. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if know. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed project is located within the City of Renton. The eastern terminus of the alignment is located next to the Renton Community Center, while the western terminus is located north of the bath house within Renton's Liberty Park. See Attachment A. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site: Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: with the exception of I-405 which is elevated upon fill, the protect area is flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The side slopes of I-405 are approximately 40%. C. What general types site (for example, muck)? If you know agricultural soils, prime farmland. of soils are found on the clay, sand, gravel, peat, the classification of specify them and note any Loamy fine sand and fill material. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None along the immediate alignment, but the banks of the Cedar River are prone to instability due to undercutting by the river. 2. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Some fill material will be used for pipe bedding. Only clean fill would be allowed. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. Project construction activities involving soils excavation could result in erosion. Erosion could occur as a result of exposed soils. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? With the exception of new manholes, no new impervious areas would be added as a result of this project. h. What measures are proposed to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any? Standard construction related best management practices would be employed to avoid or minimize erosion potential at active construction areas. These practices could include the use of staked straw bales around soil stockpiles, diversion of runoff away from active construction areas, placement of silt fences or sediment barriers between the active trench area and the Cedar River, cleaning of construction vehicle tires prior to leaving an excavation area and covering material stockpiles. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Project would contribute emissions to the air from the operation of construction vehicles. Other emission sources may be blowing dust from exposed soils. These emissions would be short- term, limited to the duration of construction. No emissions would occur from the operation of the trunk line. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. IM C. What measures are proposed to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any? Standard construction management practices which may include the use of properly maintained vehicles, discouraging prolonged vehicle idling, covering dirt stockpiles and practicing dust control activities. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, or wetlands)? If yes, describe and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. The Cedar River is located to the south of the proposed project. The Cedar River flows into Lake Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to the described waters? No work is proposed within project area waters. The proposed alignment is set back from the top of the Cedar River bank, atop the first set of river terraces. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a loo- year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. Proposed alignment is set atop fill which is above the identified 100-year floodplain (FIRM Map 530088 0002). 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. !am b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Dewatering of excavated pipe trench may be necessary. Dewatering water would be discharged to the sanitary sewer system. No discharge to ground water would occur. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Other than temporary construction site runoff management measures which would be implemented for erosion control purposes, existing runoff patterns would be maintained. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated. d. What measures are proposed to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff impacts, if any. Project would implement necessary safeguards to insure that drainage from active construction areas is controlled to prevent off site movement to the Cedar River. Construction staging areas would be kept clean to prevent material from entering storm water systems. Measures to control runoff quality could include covering catch basin grates draining staging areas with filter fabric. No staging of construction vehicles or materials would be allowed under the I-405 bridge. Construction activities would also be carried out to insure protection of the City of Renton's municipal aquifer. Construction materials would be stored, handled and used with the necessary care to prevent spillage. Spill containment and clean up material would be located on site. Emergency protocol identifying spill response and communication would be developed prior to start of construction. The proposed design of the pipe includes the use of rubber gaskets at all joints, and where the trunk is cased, the annular space would be filled with grout, or sand with cement grout plugs. The abandoned pipe would be filled with an inert material and abandoned. Some portions of the existing pipe may be removed by WDOT as part of their construction activities. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: cottonwood, ash X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind or amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Lawn and landscaping associated with the Community Center would be removed. At the west terminus, lawn would be removed. Construction activities would protect and avoid street trees along Houser Way North. C. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None are known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Where vegetation is removed or altered due to construction, similar vegetation would be replanted and the disturbed area returned to its original character. Construction activities would be located to avoid the drip line of the street trees along Houser Way North. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: - - - -.� w -..T..---.�-a+r-s«r : - . - :4 6. 7. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to be on or near the site. C. Is the site a part of a migration route? The alignment itself is not part of a migration route, but the Cedar River supports a salmon run. d. Proposed measures to enhance wildlife, if any: None. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, woodstove, solar) will be used to meet the project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The proposed trunk line would be a gravity line. No energy would be expanded for operation of the trunk line. Construction vehicles would utilize fossil fuels. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? No. C. What kind of energy conservation features are included in the plans for this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts if any: None. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area that may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The proposed project would not have a long-term noise impact. Short-term project noise impacts would be associated with construction activities and be limited to hours of active construction. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The proposed project would implement noise control measures to minimize the level and duration of construction related noise. These measures could include limited hours of construction, mufflers required on all construction equipment, and use of temporary noise barriers. In addition, the project would coordinate construction activities to minimize or avoid construction noise effects upon events scheduled at the Community Center and the Carco Theater. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current uses along the proposed alignment consist of open area around the Carco Theater and Renton Community Center at the eastern terminus; I-405; and parking associated with Liberty Park on the western terminus. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. C. Describe any structures on the site: See response to 8.a. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Current zoning along the proposed alignment is P-1, Public Use (City of Renton Zoning Map, August, 1991). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The comprehensive plan designation along the proposed alignment is Recreation (City of Renton Comprehensive Plan, April 1985). g. If applicable what is the current shoreline designation of the site? The City of Renton's Shoreline Management Program (revised July 16, 1990), identifies the Cedar River shoreline in the vicinity of the proposed project as Urban Environment. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No, although the proposed alignment does lie within the City of Renton's aquifer protection area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project would not restrict current or future planned uses identified in existing land use plans. The proposed project is an allowed use under Section Seven of the City of Renton's Shoreline Management Program. Please see the response to item B.3.d. for proposed measures to protect ground water quality. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennae; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or blocked? None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light and glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None. C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designated or informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The termini of the proposed trunk are located within two City of Renton parks, Liberty Park and Cedar River Park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing uses? No, although the proposed project would require the temporary use of a portion of existing park parking area at both parks for construction staging activities. C. What measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any? The timing of construction activities would be scheduled to minimize disruption to park users. The proposed alignment would not deny the use of, or access to the parks, their identified play fields or associated facilities. Where foot traffic is present, signage or barriers would be used to direct pedestrians around construction areas. The extent of staging areas would be kept to a minimum, with the location and restoration, if necessary, of the affected areas coordinated with the City of Renton's Park Department. Please also see the responses to B.7.b.3) and B.14.g. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. - The western terminus can be accessed along Houser Way North, a designated principal arterial. The eastern terminus can be accessed from two directions, through the main access to Cedar River Park from Highway 169, or along an access road off of Houser Way North and under I-405. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. Nearest Metro bus service is along Mill Avenue South approximately 200 yards to the southwest of the proposed alignment's western terminus. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The proposed alignment crosses under I-405 and Burlington Northern train trackage. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Construction would occur adjacent to Houser Way North. At this time it is anticpated that construction activities would not occur within the travel lanes of Houser Way North. The alignment crosses a secondary access road located in the southwest corner of Cedar Park. This crossing would be an open cut. Access to the rear portion of the community center would be maintained with a minimum amount of diruption. Construction affecting the secondary access road would be coordinated with the staff of the Community Center. Construction access to the Cedar River Park would be primarily restricted to the secondary access road. Due to size limitations, some construction vehicles may have to use the main access road to Cedar River Park. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: HOT b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None. 16. Utilities a. Circle the utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature C`- Date LO / 21 (q ( 6EOsL4 R/IvER ./ ATTACHMENT A +:z�Y Jesse Tanner, Mayor March 5, 1996 CITY OF REIITTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator F 47 TRANSMITTAL MEMO I# of P"es -- _ Bill Nitz King County Department of Natural Resources Water Pollution Control Division 821 Second Avenue, MS 81 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER PIPELINE RELOCATION PHASE II Dear Bill: In regard to the issues presented in the City's letter to you on December 15, 1995, the City is satisfied that all items of concern have been addressed to the satisfaction of the City of Renton. In regard to the revised connection of our 8-inch facility in N. Third Street, we were given as -built information from Mike Paulson to allow staff to determine that we could sufficiently operate and maintain. this facility with our current equipment. In regard to the manhole installations along N. Third Street in the adjacent alleys, the City has connected to each of these facilities and has been ableto readjust its design elevation such that we will have an acceptable facility. It is also our understanding that Frank Collucio Construction has entered into an agreement with Gary Merlin Construction that all costs associated with the revisions needed within the manholes as well as completion of all .punchlist items from the Phase II .project will be completed by Gary. Merlino Construction and paid for by Frank Collucio Construction. With this agreement in place, all issues outstanding with the City are resolved. I would like to thank you, Eddy Tate, and Mike Paulson for your assistance in rectifying these issues in such a professional and expeditious manner. If you have any questions or require additional information, plea n a t me at (206) 277-6212. Utility Supervisor H:DOCS:96-161DC:js 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 A4.10 Earl Clymer, Mayor December 15, 1995 Mr. William E. Nitz METRO CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator 821 Second Avenue, MS 130 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT: METRO CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE PHASE II CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF CITY FACILITIES Dear Bill: During the construction of City sanitary sewer facilities associated with the construction of the relocated trunkline, revisions from the approved plans were made in the field. These revisions were not discussed with any City personnel for impact to the City's system. The revisions made have left the City in one instance, with a facility that we have no ability to clean and in another case with facilities that have required us to modify our design for our local sewer facilities that are currently under construction by the City. At this time, I have not been able to obtain a response from the construction group at Metro in order to determine the need for these field revisions or to bring to closure the responsibilities and costs associated with the field revisions. On North Third Street, between Williams Avenue North and Wells Avenue North, a parallel 8 inch sewer main was installed to replace the existing sewer main that serves those residences on the south side of North Third Street. The connection of this 8 "inch line from the City's manhole to the Metro line was constructed with two 45 degree bends back-to-back to allow a 90' tum from the manhole to the Metro main (see attached copy of as -built) in lieu of the approved design of a 90' channel within the manhole and an 8 inch line directly into the. Metro facility. This connection method makes it impossible for the City to maintain this line as we do not have equipment that can negotiate these bends. As such, we are left to own and operate a facility that we cannot utilize our equipment for cleaning and may pose a problem if we have a plug in the line at this location. I am not sure what the remedy for this issue is, especially because I do not know why the modification to the original design was permitted to be installed by the contractor (i.e. utility conflicts, other construction impacts, etc.). I wish to discuss this matter further with you in order to bring resolution to this matter. In the case of the connections to Metro from our alley locations, the invert elevations at the manhole were all set above the design elevation shown on the plans and in more than one instance were over one foot above the design elevation (see attached copy of as-builts and table). This modification has caused the City to redesign its alley sewer plans such that we meet the revised elevations. In addition, our contractor has been required to re -drill a number of the connections to the manhole and bust out the channel provided in order to adjust to the higher as -built elevations from Metro's contractor. This additional work may require a change order from our contractor. Because this work was necessitated from improper installation of our facilities by Metro's contractor, it would be our understanding that Metro will be responsible for all costs associated with any additional work by our contractor for adjustments to the existing facility to meet our design. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 William E. Nitz, Metro Metro Cedar River Tnmkline Phase II Construction Management of City Facilities Page 2 It is unfortunate that this situation has arisen, however, the City must seek a remedy for these issues. As of this point, I have been totally unsuccessful in my attempts with the construction group and as such, I am requesting your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277-6212. S. INVERT ELEVATIONS AT INVERT "B", SCHEDULE A (Typical 8" Sanitary Sewer Connection & Schedule), SHEET C108 OF THE CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PHASE 2 PLANS. The City performed an as -built survey on the new sewer lines after receiving both of the contractor's as- builts. Both of the contractor's as -built elevations differed from the design elevations and each other by unacceptable margins. ALLEY DESIGN ELEVATION AS -BUILT AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS BY ELEVATIONS BY CONTRACTOR CITY Williams/Wells 24.00 25.16 25.01 Wells/Pelly 24.15 24.15 23.86 Pelly/Park 25.92 27.00 26.85 Park/Garden 26.96 27.24 27.08 Garden/Meadow 27.73 28.66 28.54 INVERT ELEVATIONS AT INVERT "C", SCHEDULE A The contractor performed a second as -built on the indicated alleys when the City questioned why the inverts elevations were much higher than the design invert elevations. ALLEY DESIGN ELEVATION FIRST AS -BUILT SECOND AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS BY ELEVATIONS BY CONTRACTOR CITY Williams/Wells 25.00 26.16 25.21 Wells/Pelly 25.15 25.15 Pelly/Park 26.92 27.73 27.05 Park/Garden 27.96 27.96 Garden/Meadow 28.73 28.73 28.73 / 1 tXIJ I IWC b 5 I. ,PLUG EXISTING ;6" SS FLOW I LIMITS OF EXCAVATION NEW 42 METRO SEWER, SEE SCH-A FOR INVERT i ---J------- /------------ 4- , --. ------ 1E 8"(B)--1 E 5(C) \-IE 8" O A `$" PVC STUE FOR FUTURE D NEW RENTON OFFSET DISTANCE RIGHT R `NEW 8" SS F DO NOT PUT UNTIL INSTRU ENGINEER SCHEDULE -A STA IE 0 IE (A) 'IEC(B)' IE -(C)- MANHOLE 0 42" ** *..*., �; REMARKS * * TYPE PAGE STA OFFSET 1. -1-+80 18.25 21.44 �'L99.. ' B B072 1 +60 30'R BURNETT f 2� Z�2. f S,p /WILLIAMS ALLEY 2. 19.36 22.55 - -88` it 42'R WILLIAMS/WELLS ALLEY } B B072 �, 7 Z 3. 8+01 20.19 23.38 24 `15 y 5 w B B072 8+01 WELLS PELLY ALLEY 4. 46+81 21.04 24.23 z- B B072 1 +81-3i'R - PELLY/PARK ALLEY /3f 27,Z4-;" �' - 7-3 161-57.0 31-31Z 5• i 3 i 55 21.87 25.06 z 8 B072R PARK/GARDEN ALLEY � � 6. 18-10 23.23 26.42 B072 GARDEN/MEADOW ALLEY ZOf89 3 ,0 7. 20+89 24.07 27.26 B B072 �9+>�9 40'R �_<....,�� ....-..• ...._ 3 -� MEADOW/FACTORY ALLEY * REFER TO SPECIFICATION SECTION M02605 AND CITY OF RENTON; STANDARD PLANS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPLE CONSTRUCTION. ** CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO THE MANHOLE AND 8" SEWER CONNECTIONS. TYPICAL 8" SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION & SCHEDULE SCALE: NONE LA December 14, 1995 Mr. William E. Nitz Metro 821 Second Avenue, MS 130 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT: METRO CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE PHASE II CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF CITY FACILITIES Dear Bill: During Metro's construction of City sanitary sewer facilities associated with the construction of the relocated trunkline, revisions from the approved plans were made in the field. These revisions were not discussed with any City personnel for impact to the our system. The revisions made have left the City with one facility that we have no ability to clean and other facilities that have required us to modify the design for the local sewer facilities currently under construction by the City. At this time, we have not been able to obtain a response from the Metro's construction group explaining the need for these field revisions. This has not allowed us to bring closure to the responsibilities and costs associated with the field revisions. On North Third Street, between Williams Avenue North and Wells Avenue North, a parallel 8-inch sewer main was installed to replace the existing sewer main that serves the residences on the south side of North Third Street. The connection of this 8-inch line, from the City's manhole to the Metro line, was constructed with two 45 degree bends back-to-back to allow a 90' turn from the manhole to the Metro main (see attached copy of as -built). This does not meet the intent of the design of a 90' channel within the manhole and an 8-inch line directly into the Metro facility. The City does not have equipment that can negotiate these bends. As such, we are left to own and operate a facility that cannot be cleaned utilizing our equipment, which may pose a problem if we have a plug in the line at this location. I am not sure what the remedy for this issue is, primarily because I do not know why the modification to the original design was permitted to be installed by the contractor (i.e. utility conflicts, other construction impacts, etc.). I wish to discuss this matter further with you in order to bring resolution to this matter. In regard to the connections installed by Metro for our alley sewers, the invert elevations at the manholes were all set above the design elevations shown on the plans. In more than one instance, the invert was greater than one foot above the design elevation (see attached copy of as-builts and table). These modifications have made it necessary for the City to redesign its alley sewer plans to meet the revised elevations. In addition, our contractor has been required to re -drill a number of the connections to the manhole and to bust out the new channel in order to make adjustments for the higher elevations installed by Metro's contractor. This additional work may require a change order from our contractor. Because this work was made necessary by improper installation of our facilities by Metro's contractor, it would be our understanding that Metro will be responsible for all costs associated with any additional work, by our contractor, for adjustments to the existing facility to meet our design. William E. Nitz, Metro Metro Cedar River Trunkline Phase II Construction Management of City Facilities Page 2 It is unfortunate that this situation has arisen, however, the City must seek a remedy for these issues. As of this point, I have been totally unsuccessful in my attempts with the construction group and as such, I am requesting your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277-6212. Sincerely, David M. Christensen Wastewater Utility Supervisor H:DOCS:95-1032:DMC:ps CC: Ron Olsen John Hobson PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY CALLOUT LOG LOCATION: 2 tr ctl n �T �W i cand TIME REPORTED: 12, �loj'1/� TIME OF ARRIVAL: /, as yU, TIME REPAIRED: 2,//� �12� TROUBLE REPORTED: o CAUSE OF TROUBLE: dp-ea Apo, ,A E^J f.,n hOJ� �4S REMARKS: pp REPAIRED BY.10 / �., DATE: /y /C� I V CITY OF RENTON MAINTENANCE SERVICES DIVISION WORK REQUEST Request No.: W000593 Mgmt Unit: ST Request Date: 01/14/96 Time: 12:40P Name: RENTON POLICE Source: 15 Address: Phone: H (206) - W (206) - E x t RENTON, WA 98056 Updated: 01/15/96 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem/Need: CAR HIT TRANSPORTATION PANEL ON MANHOLE. Status: AREA AROUND MANHOLE HAS SUNK. COMPLETED ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem Addr: IN ALLEY BTWN BURNETT & WILLIAMS & N 2ND & N 3D ----------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- Comments: Taken By: KT ASSIGNED Prg: Activity: Location: Priority: WORK C/O:_ Inspected By: Due Date: / / Est. Labor Hours: Follow-up: More?(Req No): CLOSE- Completion Date: 01/14/96 Time: By: WEIHER OUT Work: TEMP REPAIR ON CALL -OUT P aq e7 9.50 1 R E N T 0 N P 0 L I C E D E P A R T M E N T.- Case# 96-000446 I n c i d e n t R e p o r t ! Ofns 1) 440 HAZ ROADWAY CONDITION ! Weather ! District ! Grid ! ! Ofns 2) I- -RATN 6 t 1114 I ! Ofns 3) ! Address of Occurrence ? ! Ofns 4) ! 330 BURNETT AV N f t ! Date and Time Reported ? Date and Time Occurred ! 01/14/96 12:00 1i:;6 O1%14/96 11:30 ' !VICTIM ! Name ! Rose I ; QX. ? Date Of birth ! ! ! HIRSCHFELD, MARIANNE E ! W '_._...__♦-_.__. ! _ 05/28/64 I ! Disclosure ? Home Address ! City ! ST Zip Code ! Home Phone ! NOT DISCUSSED!_ 110 RURNETr aV Al ! RFN-triN I WA QR0F,C; I 71—r074 ' ! ! Bu5inoss/School Nam, I Work Phone ! ! ! PRIVATE IND COUNCIL KC !271—(_4[f�_? I ! ! Hgt ! Wgt ! Hair ! Eye ! Age Range ! Bkd? !#Cits! Citation # ! Offense 1 V ! Offense 2 31— 31 ! ! ! Citation # ! Offense 3 ! 1 ! I I I I I I t Of FenFense 4 ! l t ! ! Description ! ! Rel To Vic Build Hairstyle ! Tattoo r:a(.i%.a! !lair• Tc,ar--It I ! ! ! Gen Appr Speech Skin Tone j !OTHER ! Name ! Race ! ± Sex ! Date Of Birth ! ' ? ! R[.[dT(,N , r .T i Y tlF . STREET DFP T i I 00/00 /00 ! Disclosure ! Home Addr•e5-: ' r-ii.y >_;7 Zirr Code ' 'Home Phone I j ! NOT DISCUSSED! 200 MILL AV S ! PENTON ! WA 98.05.5;2 5-2566 ! ! ! Business/School Name 1 Work Phone ! ! ! Hqt: ! Wcit ! !pair Eye I tic;e Rentj" t kkOV I#,_i.i Cj.t_,tior, ## I Offense 1 0 r 1 ! ! ! t ! ! ! ! ! Offense 2 ? offense 3 ! r)fferiso 4�' r ! Description ! ± ? I ! ! Rel To Vic Bui.id Heir-.tyle, ' _ ! Tattoo Facial Hair Teeth ! ! _ ! I Gen Appr- Speech -3ki.n Tone ! I ! Cade ! ,rty ? Item ! Brvnry ? i`krc�elj:�Fyle ! ! DAMAGED ! 1 ! MISC PROPERTY/ALL OTHER ! Caliber ! Color ! Serial # ± OAN # ! Value ! 206 ! EntIr•avincIs/Peculiarities/OimensionS ! COVER TO TRANSAXLE I ± r !VICTIM VEHICLE' License ;ST !Year '.Make !Model!Style ! Color ! Value ! Hold ! t I RiRr_.DF tW_A ± 4f> Ir±1l_, s PRi t ;+[, Ita41iI% uIN To I Hold For ! I Description ! , ! Name oi' Person Noi_ ,. 1 � �I, a (1 I i I [r�.l n ��r�r_ T �, n (� i How ;"•f t,� H ii Fied ' By ' I t 100/00/00 ± ! ! MATNEWS ._..�. tr, BAB _ 01/ L Z9_ OQ : 24 Reporting Ofcr / Serial# Typed/Entered By Date/Time Reviewed By rL R E. N T 0 N P O L I C E D E P A R T M -E N T Case# 96-000446 Incident Report ! Ofns 1) 440 HAZ ROADWAY CONDITION ! Weather ! District ! Grid ! Ofns 2) RATN 6 1114 i Ofns 3). ! Address of Occurrence , Ofns 4) ! 31Q-11URA1EIT_..8V.. N_... ! Date and Time Reported ! Date and Time Occurred 01/14/96 12:00 1 01/14/96 11:30 01/14/96. 11:.30 ! ! D O C U M E N T No (001) ! Hirschfeld was driving SB in the alley between Burnett Aw M and Williams Av N in the 200 blk. When she drove over the man hole cover ,just south of N 3rd St she hit it with the bottom of her car ripping a part off the bottom. The area around the man hole cover is fresh asphalt and has sunk down making the manhole cave 6" — 8" above the ground. Officer Mathews/6445 1/16/96 BAB 96-446 << i BAB QIJ1-.L.26..-100 Qi MCC Ti%I .Y 5556 oportinq Ofcr / Serial# Tvoed/Entered By Datp/Time aowiownd Ri, THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS FOURTH FLOOR 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055-2189 FAX: 235-2541 To: Company: Phone: Fax: From: Company: Phone: Fax: Date: Pages including this cover page: Comments: MIKE' ��4��soi.1 (-og) 4-- 2Z84 21. Z --Co 1 `j J 1 3t,1 (" 0 SPY � J � L L-- OuT' `T.f3�1' �23 35 7 � 5z 39 z� 02 M �uMH OCT 17 1995 SOUTH SATELLITE OFFICE CONSTRUCTION DIVISION —4.,7 —2;�,e% ;y CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator November 21, 1995 Mike Paulson King County Department of Metropolitan Services 821 Second Avenue, M.S. SC Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PHASE H PUNCH LIST FOR SANITARY SEWERS Dear Mike: The following is a partial punch list of items which need to be done to the sanitary sewer manholes in the alleys south of North 3rd Street. Manhole / Alley MH # 1: Burnett/Williams MH #5::Park/Garden MH #7: Meadow/Factory_ All Manholes Needed Work Install elbow at bottom of drop. • Re -channel manhole to springline. ' Complete permanent asphalt work to match into back of sidewalk and alley. • Remove channel from manhole. • Complete permanent asphalt work to match into back of.sidewalk and alley. • Grout around pipes at invert entering Metro • line. Grout around all pipes on MH #1 and #7. If you have any questions, please call me at 277-6179. Sincerely, John D.' Hobson Wastewater Utility 95,9858DH/jdh 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 &"&METRO Letter of Transmittal 821 Second Ave., M.S. 117, Seattle, WA 98104-1598 (206) 684-1298 To /rilUl�J/ �' I,CJaI 8Id9' 9�oss— We are sending you the following:L<Attached Under separate cover Date File/Contract No. To Attent n Of Regarding _ oiylf �h2se- 2 4-3 3 rq G e Copies Date Drwg. No. _ Description /Y. f !tl ,oPvOf We-,o-z7S— G These are transmitted: ❑ For approval For your use and information `�6s requested /❑ For review and comment ❑ Other Remarks �'D�l�S `aCAFD/ p�`Z�«2 of .�2 S . U �! '- %Z & et -I S n lure ! g Title uivis n T / /D nog, King County Department of Natural Resources Water Pollution Control Division Exchange Building, MS 130 • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 January 4, 1996 Mr. Dave Christensen Wastewater Utilities Supervisor,-� Planning / Building / Public Works Department p t j City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 - ��ii�eerir;r. Metro Cedar River Trunkline Phase II, Response to City of Renton Letter Dated December 15, 1995 Dear Dave: I have received your letter of December 15th regarding your concerns with the relocated Cedar Trunkline and deviations from approved plans which were made in the field during construction of the pipeline. I forwarded a copy of your letter to Eddie Tate, Manager for our Construction Division, and Eddie has spoken to Mike Paulson and Sheldon Teel regarding your concerns. This letter summarizes our plan and commitment to address your concerns. First, it is our intent to correct the problems with the trunkline and manholes at no cost, and with a minimum of inconvenience to the City of Renton. Second, we are committed to resolving the problems to your complete satisfaction, and we will not consider the problems to be corrected until you agree that they are. Steps that we have taken to correct the problems are 1. A copy of your letter has been given to our Construction Division, and discussions have occurred between Eddie Tate, Sheldon Teel, and Mike Paulson. Eddie has directed that the problems are to be resolved by King County and at no expense to the City of Renton or to your contractor. 2. Mike Paulson has contacted Frank Coluccio Construction Co. and Mike has received a written response from Alan Christian, Project Engineer for FCC. A copy of the letter to Mike is attached. Alan acknowledges that Renton has correctly identified a problem with as -built versus design inverts at the subject manholes, and commits that corrective work will be performed at no cost to Metro or the City of Renton. 3. Mike Paulson is contacting John Hobson regarding the new parallel 8-inch sewer line. Eddie Tate has directed that the line be installed to Renton's satisfaction, even if it requires that the connection and line be excavated and reinstalled. Eddie and I believe that these actions will remedy the problems described in your letter. I also believe that Mike and FCC will follow through with and correct the problems to your satisfaction. Thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention, and please let me know if there is anything more that I can do to help. Sincerejy, William E. Nitz Capital Projects Supervisor Attachment cc: Mr. Eddie Tate Mr. Sheldon Teel Mr. Mike Paulson Ms. Mann -Ling Thibert F r Ot : FCCC METRO hLK I lof G Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle 821 Second Avenue O Seattle, Washington 98104 ATTENTION: Mike Paulson - Resident Ender SUBJECT: Crdar River Trunk - Phase H, WN 07-94 Alley Manhole Repairs Dear ,Mr. Paulson: 27 December 1995 W/M 07-94-011 This is in response to your letter of 21 December (W/M 7-36) and our recent conversation regarding additional work at the alley manhole connections. The City of Renton correctly identifies a problem with the as - built versus design inverts at the subject manholes. However, most if not all of the remedial work/adjustment required to make the system functional has been completed. Our discussions with Gary Merlin Construction indicate that no additional charges have been forwarded to the City of Renton and that none are forthcoming. Any additional costs attributable to the corrective work will be the responsibility of GMCC and FCCC with no Change Order Request to either METRO or the City of Renton. If you have any questions or require additional information, contact me at 287-1520. Sincerely, 9600 M L King Way Soup • SesMe. Washington 98118-5693 • (206) 722.5306 • Fax (206) 725-4754 - FRW+KC-C340L7 DEC-23-1995 11:24 92% P.02 t- FA no w� R1ETRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle • Environmental Planning and Real Estate Division 821 Second Ave., M.S. 120 • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684-1165 • Fax (206) 684-1900 March 15, 1994 City of Renton SEPA Review 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA, Dear Sir/Madam: 98055 DEVEIGFMENT PLANNING C9-Y OF RENTON RECEIVED Metro has issued a SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance on its Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project Phase II & III. Copies of the project's DNS and checklist are enclosed as required by WAC 1 97-1 1-340. Also attached is a copy of Metro's SEPA Register for your information. If you have any questions please contact me at 684-1 174. Slncerely, Tim Goon Environmental Planning & Real Estate Division enlcosures Meti o SEPA Register A listing of environmental documents issued by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle. VOL. 9 NO. 2 DATE: March 15, 1994 TYPE: DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE NAME OF PROJECT: Cedar River Trunk Line Relocation Project Phase II & III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Metro is proposing to complete the phased relocation of its existing Cedar River Sewer Trunk Line within the City of Renton, Washington. The proposal would result in the construction of approximately 5,000 linear feet of new 42 inch diameter, ductile iron, gravity sewer pipe. The relocation is being undertaken to provide additional protection to the City of Renton's sole source drinking water aquifer by moving the existing trunk line further away from city wellheads. Construction of Phase II and III is scheduled for mid 1994 and mid 1995 respectively. Methods of construction would include open cut and jacking of the trunk line where open cuts would be impractical. In conjunction with the construction of Phase II, City of Renton street improvements to North Third Avenue will occur. These improvements will not reduce the number of current travel lanes along North Third. Construction should last approximately six months for each phase. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed realignment is located entirely within the City of Renton. The proposed trunk alignment extends west along State Route 169, under Interstate 405, along Third Avenue North and connects to Metro's existing Eastside Interceptor near Third Avenue North and Burnett Avenue in Renton. Those portions of the project west and east of Interstate 405 are designated Phase II and III respectively. FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Goon, Environmental Planner at 684 - 1174 DATE ISSUED: March 15, 1994 END OF COMMENT PERIOD: March 30, 1994 ;►0METRO Environmental Planning Division The Metro SEPA Register is issued a minimum of four times a year Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave. or as needed when a new environmental document is prepared. Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Annual subscription fee is $12.00. For information about the Register call 684-4163. �:METR0 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684-2100 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PHASE II & III PROJECT DESCRIPTION: King County Metro is proposing to complete the phased relocation of its existing Cedar River Sewer Trunk Line within the City of Renton, Washington. The proposal would result in the construction of approximately 5,000 linear feet of new 42 inch diameter, ductile iron, gravity sewer pipe. The proposed trunk alignment extends west along Statp Route 169, under Interstate 405, along Third Avenue North and connects to Metro's existing Eastside Interceptor near Third Avenue North and Burnett Avenue in Renton. Those portions of the project west and east of Interstate 405 are designated Phase H and III respectively. Construction of Phase II and III is scheduled for mid 1994 and mid 1995 respectively. Methods of construction would include open cut and jacking of the trunk line where open cuts would be impractical. In conjunction with the construction of Phase H, City of Renton street improvements to North Third Avenue will occur. These improvements will not reduce the number of current travel lanes along North Third. PROPONENT: King County Metro LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: The entire project lies within the City of Renton. The proposed alignment can be generally described as beginning near Third Avenue North and North Burnett Street proceeding east along North Third Avenue to North Factory Street; a transition area which carries the trunk line under Burlington Railroad tracks, Interstate 405 and State Route 169; and extending approximately 950 feet east along State Route 169 from Interstate 405. LEAD AGENCY: King County Metro The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under WAC 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. X This DNS is issued under 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by March 30, 1994. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Gregory M. Bush POSITION/TITLE: Manager/Environmental Planning & Real Estate Division TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 684-1164 ADDRESS: 821 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104 DATE: March 15, 1994 SIGNATURE: 41. av,41� You may appeal this determination to Carolyn Purnell, Deputy Executive for Metro/Executive Director, at the Office of the King County Executive, King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Room 400, Seattle, Washington 98104-3271. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Tim Goon at 684-1174 regarding the SEPA appeals procedures. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cedar River Trunk Phase II and Ill. 2. Name of applicant: King County Department of Metropolitan Services (Metro) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: King County Department of Metropolitan Services - Metro Environmental Planning and Real Estate Division 821 Second Avenue, MS 120 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CONTACT: Tim Goon, Telephone: (206) 684-1174 4. Date checklist prepared: March 10, 1994 5. Agency requesting checklist: King County Metro 6. Proposed timing or schedule: Phase II construction is anticipated to begin during the second quarter 1994 and continue for approximately six months. Phase III activities during 1994 will consist of design and easement acquisition efforts. Phase III construction is scheduled to begin in mid 1995. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? No. Phase II and III addressed in this document are the final phases of the Cedar River Trunk project. Once construction of Phase III is finished sometime in 1995, the project will be completed. Project phasing was necessary in order to accommodate scheduling of construction activities associated with the Washington Department of Transportation (WDOT) Interstate 405 (1-405) improvements. Specifically, relocation of the trunk in Phase I was required to avoid potential damage from WDOT's construction of a new 1-405 Cedar River crossing. Subsequent to completion of Phase I in 1992, a preferred relocation alignment for the Cedar River Trunk was selected in concert with Metro, the City of Renton and residents of North Renton. The project was again divided into phases to accommodate construction activities and scheduling restrictions caused by 1-405 construction. Metro's Phase II construction activities would also include construction of street improvements identified by the City of Renton as part of the city's North Renton Livable Streets Plan. The extent of the proposed street improvements are described in section A.11 below. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Metro's SEPA Checklist and Determination of Nonsignificance for Phase I of the Cedar River Trunk relocation project, October 1991. City of Renton's SEPA Categorical Exemption. City of Renton North Renton Livable Streets/North 3rd Street project, February 28, 1994. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. The City of Renton's Livable Streets Plan and Alley Sewer Project would directly affect construction associated with Phase II of the proposed Cedar River Trunk relocation. A building permit is pending for construction on property which would be crossed by one of the Phase III alternative alignments. The city is proposing to implement an element of their North Renton Livable Streets Plan which would directly affect that portion of the alignment along North Third Avenue west of 1-405. The city is proposing the following: demolish existing curbs on both sides of the street and construct new curbs and gutters four feet closer to the centerline of North Third Street; replace selected portions of the existing sidewalk; construct a landscaped planter strip between the existing sidewalk and relocated curbs; full width street overlay with asphalt concrete pavement; and adjustment of existing drainage structures, utilities, and driveway grades. Renton's Alley Sewer project would replace sewers located in the alleys between Brooks Avenue North and Bronson Avenue North, from North Fourth and North First Streets. Alleys would also be resurfaced and new storm sewers constructed. Only those local sewers crossed by the proposed trunk alignment would be affected. The city's project would begin after the Cedar River Trunk Phase II project. There are two alignment alternatives being proposed for that portion of the project alignment as it transitions from Phase II to Phase III (Figure 1). One of the proposed alternatives crosses a privately owned vacant parcel which would require the acquisition of temporary construction and permanent pipeline easements. The City of Renton is currently processing permit applications to construct a building on this parcel. The timing of construction and design of the building may preclude selection of this alternative. There are no other projects currently being considered that would affect phase III of the Cedar River Trunk project. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Street Use Permit City of Renton Utility Construction Permit City of Renton Aquifer Protection Area Operating Permit City of Renton Parks Department Approval Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Construction Approval E /.Z�;LJLJ [CEDAR RIVER I L 11 IITRUNKF----] 'A.QLl R R,0-ffC 10N AREA BOUNDARY—N 4TH ST1n --- TH -- � �n Q N I I I II�, PHASE 2 m II , I I I I IZI 11 IZI''Z >-- ll IIIZIalal I I lal I I N MARION T I II I 1 II I I z 3 O / I II I I II III I IYI IwQI I I IQ[ II ILl V�� I I II I uu u 1 L-,- 3RD S��u Ll Li Ll nn 1 I 11 I-4 11 1 1 11I„ BROOKS T, U Nil O^•11 I II I II I Li 1-1 L . , I I I 'F]Li ; 'I II II II I II I I II , V WELL I � I I/ LIBERTYPARK J�437 � I II � I •��, r" , WELL O I 11I 1 I I I I E L o HLJq goo o +oo eoo Imo F-1 F--- (1--400') o m E T A O ,WELL O ALTERNATE �1 -' ROUTE \ Ne 3R0 Sr EA�R RIVER TRUNK IELLO �\ sc� PHASE 3 CEDAR RIVER PARK EXISTING 4r SS CEDAR RIVER TRUNK PROJECT I FIGURE 1 Metro Industrial Waste Discharge Approval Washington Department of Transportation Project Design Approval Department of Ecology Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description). King County Metro is proposing to complete the realignment of a portion of its existing Cedar River Trunk. The realignment is being undertaken in order to provide an increased level of protection to the City of Renton's municipal water wells PW1, PW2 and PW3. The current proposal consists of two phases. Phase II This phase of the project involves the installation of approximately 2,800 linear feet of gravity sewer line. Pipe material would be ductile iron. Construction method would be open cut and would occur within existing street right of way. Manholes would be installed along the pipe, affected city side sewers would be replaced and reconnected to the new trunk line, and utilities would be relocated where appropriate. The western terminus of the pipe would connect to the existing Metro Eastside Interceptor. Additional work associated with city street improvements along North Third Street are described above in section A. 9. Connecting Phases II and III would be made using one of two alternative alignments. See Figure One. Selection of an alternative is dependent in part, upon the ability to obtain the necessary temporary easements for construction and placement of the sewer trunk across private properties located between North Brooks Street and Sunset Boulevard. Descriptions of the alternatives are provided below, effects of each alternative are addressed in the appropriate sections of this document. A. Phase II of this alternative alignment proceeds south from the intersection of North Third Street and Factory Avenue North to North Brooks Street; east along North Brooks Street to a point just short of the Burlington Northern tracks. Under Phase III, the alignment would be jacked under the Burlington Northern tracks, open cut or jacked across the vacant parcel, and jacked under Sunset Boulevard NE and 1- 405. B. This alternative proceeds east from the intersection of North Third Street and Factory Avenue North along North Third Street, under the Burlington Northern tracks to Sunset Boulevard. The trunk line would turn south down the west side of Sunset Boulevard. Phase III would require excavation of a jacking pit within the right of way of Sunset Boulevard NE in order to jack the pipe under Sunset Boulevard and I- 405. Phase III While construction of this project phase is not anticipated until 1995, an alignment has been determined and sufficient information is available on alignment characteristics in order to conduct an environmental analysis. This phase would reroute the existing Cedar River Trunk from a point near the northeast corner of Cedar River Park; extend west paralleling State Route 169 (SR 169) through the parking area for Cedar River Park; under SR 169; 1-405; Sunset Boulevard; Burlington Northern Railroad tracks; and connect to the Phase II alignment. At a 3 minimum approximately 2,200 linear feet of 42 inch ductile iron pipe would be installed. The trunk line would be a gravity line. Manholes would be installed along the pipe, local sewer lines will be reconnected to the new pipe and utilities would be relocated where appropriate. Methods of construction would be open cut, boring and jacking. Jacking is a construction method which essentially pushes a steel casing horizontally beneath the ground surface. Where jacked, the trunk line would be encased within a casing. Casing would consist of a 60 inch steel pipe, approximately 610 feet of casing would be installed. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The entire project alignment lies within the City of Renton. The alignment can generally be described as east along Third Street North, between Burnett Avenue North and Factory Avenue North; a transition area where the alignment moves to the southeast in order to cross under the Burlington Northern tracks, 1-405 and SR 169; and traveling east along the south side of SR 169 approximately 950 feet east of the 1-405/SR169 intersection. See Figure One. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site: Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other (see below). b. What is the steepest slope on the site? (approximate percent slope)? Less than one percent. C. What general types of soils are found on the site? (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Prior to the lowering of Lake Washington in the 1800's, much of the project area was underwater. Imported soils of sandy silt to clayey silt overlays older alluvial deposits of clayey silt and silty fine sands. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. But concern have been raised regarding potential vibration related to construction activities. Because of this concern, construction related vibration would be minimized by limiting the use of compaction or hammering type of equipment, saw cutting the pavement for the pipe trench, and using imported fill and a 4 controlled density fill material in the pipe trench to minimize the need for compaction. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Where open cut construction is used, excavation of a trench approximately seven feet wide, and ten to fifteen feet in depth would be required. Filling and grading activities associated with pipe construction would be limited to the excavated trench. Approximately 12,000 cubic yards of soils would be removed and disposed at an approved site. Where appropriate, clean fill would be imported for use as cover material. Pipe bedding material will likely be a control density fill using a lightweight concrete type material. Quality of the pipe bedding, fill and cover material would be subject to construction contract specifications and approval by the project engineer. No significant filling or grading is anticipated along those portions of the alignment where jacking or boring would occur. Jacking pits would require excavation of areas approximately 10 feet wide by 25 to 40 feet long and 20 feet deep. A minimum of four and maximum of six pits may need to be excavated. Soils would also be removed from within the casing in order to install the trunk line. Disposal of spoils would be at an approved site. Renton's street improvements would require demolition of the existing curbs, excavation and fill to construct new curbs and gutters, landscaping strip and sidewalks between Burnett Avenue North to Factory Avenue North. An estimated 890 cubic yards of material would be excavated, and 320 cubic yards of fill would be required for street improvements. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. A majority of the proposed alignment is within existing street right of way or paved areas. The potential for erosion is slight and limited to construction activities. Erosion potential would be during the handling of spoils or fill material, and excavation. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The proposed project would result in no net increase in impervious area. Once the sewer line is installed the trench would be filled and covered with asphalt or concrete to match the existing pavement grade. Renton's street improvements would result in a net decrease in impervious area. h. What measures are proposed to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any? Temporary construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) to reduce and control erosion would be included in the project's construction contract. These measures could include the following: - control surface runoff draining areas of active excavation; 5 - use of silt fences or hay bales to capture/filter runoff from active construction areas; - covering spoils or fill material; - site maintenance/inspection to control dust and remove dirt off roadway surfaces in areas of active construction; - protecting storm sewer inlets draining active construction areas; - dewatering devices would be operated in accordance with appropriate permits; and - proper loading of vehicles carrying soils, and cleaning of truck tires of dirt or mud prior to leaving construction site. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, emissions could be expected from the operation of construction vehicles and portable gas power tools. Although the potential is slight, operation of the trunk sewer line could result in intermittent odors. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None are know to exist. C. What measures are proposed to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any? During construction, measures could be imposed that would minimize or reduce emissions from vehicles and power equipment operations. These measures generally address equipment maintenance, prudent equipment operation, site dust control, and use of electrical equipment were feasible. Metro design criteria requires that sewer lines maintain a minimum flow velocity in order to avoid stagnant conditions which cause odors. Design review and inspections during construction would insure that Metro's design criteria is implemented properly. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, or wetlands)? If yes, describe and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. The Cedar River is located to the south of the proposed alignment. The alignment comes within 800 feet of the river. The Cedar River flows into Lake Washington. Lake Washington is located approximately one mile to the northwest of the western terminus of the alignment. 0 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to the described waters? No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. M 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. See information on anticipated dewatering in section B. 3. b. 1) below. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Dewatering of the construction trench would likely be required during construction. Volumes are not anticipated to be significant. All dewatering activities would be conducted in accordance with appropriate authorization or permit conditions. Dewatering volumes would be discharged into Metro's sanitary sewer system or other authorized discharge point. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include rA quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Existing runoff patterns would not be permanently altered along any portion of the alignment . Those portions of the proposed alignment which lie within streets and paved areas have existing storm drainage collection systems. Portions of the pipe which are jacked or bored would not alter surface runoff conditions. Once the pipe is installed, the ground surface would be returned to its original grade and condition. Proposed street improvements include adjustments to the existing drainage system to accommodate the revised roadway cross section. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The potential exists during construction for construction related materials to enter ground water via the open trench or surface waters via the existing storm water system. After installation, there is a potential for sewage to enter the ground water table as a result of leakage or breakage of the pipe. d. What measures are proposed to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff impacts, if any. Constructing the proposed project while maintaining the quality of the City's aquifer is of primary concern to Metro. The City of Renton's Aquifer Protection Ordinance construction standards regarding methods and materials would be incorporated into the construction contract as appropriate. The project would employ construction Best Management Practices to prevent the introduction of contaminants into an open trench or street catch basins . Typical measures could include: - maintain spill containment and clean up materials at all active construction areas and where equipment fueling is conducted; - conducting fueling operations on paved areas whenever possible; - store fuels and other potential contaminants away from trenches, in secured, containment areas; - conduct regular inspections, maintenance and repairs on fuel hoses, hydraulically operated equipment, lubrication equipment, and chemical/petroleum storage containers; and - establishing a communication protocol for the unlikely event of a spill. Leakage or breakage of the proposed trunk line would be detected via Metro system operations monitoring or through the city's ground water quality monitoring program. Metro has developed contingency plans in the event of facility emergencies, including major breaks of sewer conveyance lines. In the event of sewer pipe failures, staff and oncall construction personnel are mobilized to determine the extent of a failure and construct immediate repairs. See information presented in section B. 1.h. of this document for additional BMP's. 111 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: urban street trees evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other types of vegetation X other (describe): landscaping plants b. What kind or amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Only a minor amount of vegetation would be removed to install the pipe. Vegetation would be disturbed in the northwest corner of Cedar River Park, through the horseshoe shaped parcel northeast of the SR 169 and 1-405 intersection, and possibly on a parcel located east of the intersection of North Brooks Street and Houser Way North. The types of vegetation disturbed would be mainly grasses and some landscape shrubbery. Street improvements along North Third Street would remove and replace existing vegetation along the landscaping strip. C. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None are known to exist within the project area. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Vegetation disturbed or removed by construction activities would be replaced with similar vegetation. Existing street trees which may be affected by pipe construction would be protected to prevent damage from construction activities. Landscaping associated with North Third Street improvements is anticipated to consist of new grass and street trees. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. E None are known to utilize the project alignment. Although Bald Eagles are known to frequent the middle and upper reaches of the Cedar River and areas along Lake Washington. C. Is the site a part of a migration route? No. d. Proposed measures to enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, woodstove, solar) will be used to meet the project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Short term project energy needs are limited to that required to operate construction equipment. Types of energy used would be electricity and petroleum products. The proposed trunk line would flow by gravity and not require the consumption of energy for operation. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? No. C. What kind of energy conservation features are included in the plans for this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts if any: None. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal. If so, describe: ie 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise Project construction contract would contain measures to prevent spills. See section B. 3. d. of this document. 10 1) What types of noise exist in the area that may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long- term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other?) Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction related noise would be a short-term project effect. Sources and type of noise would be associated with equipment used for excavation, traffic congestion and other construction related activities. Project related noise would occur during periods of construction operations. Operation of the trunk line would not increase noise along the sewer alignment. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction operations would comply with applicable noise requirements of the City of Renton. Measures that could be employed to avoid or minimize construction related noise are requiring mufflers on equipment, sound screens around certain equipment or limiting construction hours. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Commercial, multi -family, single family residential, park/open space, major roadway and vacant. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. C. Describe any structures on the site: Construction of the trunk within the proposed alignment would not result in the demolition of any structures. Segments of the alignment would require that the trunk line be jacked under existing surface features, these would be the alignment crossings of SR 169, 1-405, Sunset Boulevard and the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. No existing surface structures would be removed due to construction, but the construction of structures above the trunk sewer line would be restricted. This restriction would be conveyed through an easement. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 11 The majority of the current zoning along the Phase II alignment is residential. Commercial zoning designations exist along Park Avenue North. Parcels adjacent to the Phase II eastern terminus are zoned Light industrial. Phase III west of 1-405 is zoned Light Industrial, and Public Use along the remainder of the alignment. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Primary comprehensive plan designation along the Phase II alignment is residential. There are neighborhood commercial and mixed use commercial in the areas of Park Avenue North and North Brooks Street respectively. Phase III comprehensive plan designation is Office/Residential Center, Mixed Use Commercial and Residential. g. If applicable what is the current shoreline designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. The proposed project alignment east of Pelly Avenue North lies within the City of Renton's Aquifer Protection Area and as such is subjected to conditions of the city's Aquifer Protection Ordinance. Applicable conditions of the ordinance would be applied to the construction and operation of the sewer trunk line. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project relocates an existing trunk sewer gravity line which would have little if any impact on current or future land uses outside of short-term construction related effects. In addition to the short-term construction related effects and mitigation already discussed, the project would make the necessary efforts to maintain access and egress to existing residences and businesses 12 adjacent to the alignment during construction. Additional information is presented in section B. 14. of this document. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennae; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or blocked? Not applicable. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light and glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 13 None. 12. Recreation a. What designated or informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Renton Stadium and Renton's Senior Center are located near Phase II's western terminus. There is a school play ground located one block to the north of the alignment along Park Avenue North. A portion of the project's Phase III alignment is routed through the northern end of Cedar River Park. Liberty Park is located to the west and across 1-405 from Cedar River Park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing uses? Construction of Phase II and III would not displace any existing uses or users, but may limit the access and restrict some parking at Cedar River Park on a temporary basis C. What measures are proposed to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any? Limit the extent of construction disruption at Cedar River Park by restricting the length of trench opened for pipe installation. Provide adequate fencing and barriers to separate park users from construction activities. Provide signage to redirect park users to alternative access routes and parking. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known to exist along or adjacent to the proposed alignment. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 14 A majority of the project alignment lies within existing street right of way. The existing street system and the proposed alignment are shown on Figure 1. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There is no public transit along North Third Street. The closest public transit stop is along Park Avenue North. Regular transit service is available along SR 169. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Construction of the sewer trunk would not eliminate parking. Although the northern parking area for Cedar River Park would be restricted as that segment of the pipe is constructed. City proposed street improvements would eliminate roughly 2,000 feet of on street parking along the southside of North Third Street between Burnette Avenue North and Wells Avenue North. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). City identified street improvements along North Third Street will be constructed as an element of the sewer construction contract. These improvements are described in section A. 9. of this document. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Depending upon the alignment chosen to link Phase II and III, Burlington Northern tracks would be crossed near the intersections of either North Third Street and Houser Way North, or Brooks Avenue North and Houser Way North. The sewer trunk line would be jacked or bored under the railroad tracks in all alternatives. Street improvements would not effect railroad operations. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Potential traffic impacts are greatest with Phase II and to a lesser extent, a portion of the Phase III alignment. All impacts are short- term and related to project construction activities. Due to the location of existing utilities and other physical constraints, the proposed Phase II alignment on North Third Street alignment is down the center of the street. A trench would be open cut in order to lay the pipe. In order to reduce traffic disruption, the trench 15 width would be minimized, and length of excavated trench open at any time would be limited. Depending upon the alternative selected for connecting Phases II and III, there could be construction related impacts to traffic flow along Factory Avenue North, North Brooks Street, Houser Way North or Sunset Boulevard. Where possible the trunk line would be sited to one side of a street allowing for minimal traffic disruption. Access to residences and businesses would be maintained under all alternatives. Existing on street parking may be limited during construction to accommodate construction activities or for use as travel lanes. Construction methods could be a combination of open cut, boring and jacked pipe casing. East of 1-405, the proposed Phase III alignment would be located within the paved street right of way. Construction activities would not disrupt traffic flow along SR 169. Access to activities and some sports field parking would be temporary disrupted at Cedar River Park. Construction traffic would be able to utilize an existing signalized intersection for access into the park. Street improvements would not reduce the number of travel lanes from existing conditions on North Third Street. Residences where on street parking is removed could continue to use their driveways, alley parking or on street parking on adjacent side streets. An eleven foot striped out area on the north side of North Third Street from Wells Avenue North to Factory Avenue North would be removed. This lane was originally designated to allow emergency vehicles to travel on North Third during peak traffic. The City has determined that the removal of the striped lane would not adversely effect the movement of emergency vehicles. Through the construction contract and permitting process the project would develop traffic control measures to address current traffic patterns and volumes, site safety and residential and business access and construction traffic disruption. Control measures could include limiting hours of construction to avoid peak traffic times; if allowed, constructing those portions of the alignment in nonresidential areas at night; minimizing the length of exposed trench; detouring traffic around active construction sites; using flaggers and signage; notification of residences and employers of pending construction and street modifications; and constructing through half an intersection at a time in order to maintain cross traffic flow. In addition, prior to starting construction the contractor would be required to prepare a traffic control plan. The plan would detail construction operations to meet project traffic control objectives, including but not limited to worker/pedestrian safety, location of temporary fencing or barricades, construction vehicle travel routes and emergency vehicle access. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None. 16. Utilities a. Circle the utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, cable, septic system, other. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature Date 3 — /(�) — 91- 17 Cedar River Trunk Route Alternatives A Metro sewer line will be relocated to give more protection to the City of Renton's aquifer. Last year the City of Renton and Metro made plans to relocate the 42-inch Cedar River Trunk sewer line to better protect the city's sole source aquifer. Before the planning process was over, construction on Interstate 405 made it necessary to move a small part of the pipeline. The planning process continues and now includes six alternatives. After public discussion of the proposed alternatives, planners and engineers from the J' 1'T1ETR0 September,1992 City of Renton and Metro will identify the best location for the pipeline. The project schedule will then be identified and more public meetings maybe held. This public information document de- scribes the six alternatives for relocating the sewer line. It answers some questions that have been asked about the project at previous public meetings. If you would like to com- ment on the route alternatives, please call or Clean Water ASoundlnvestment 21110BH.PM4 send your comments to one of the following people: Dave Christensen (phone: 277-6212) City of Renton Wastewater Utility Division 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Ron Post (phone: 684-1143) Metro Water Pollution Control Department 821 Second Ave. Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Q. Why does the sewer line need to be relocated? A. To gain needed protection for the city's aquifer. Metro and Renton staff have identi- fied six alternatives. Q. Which alternatives are being consid- ered? A. The six alternatives (see map) can be described as follows: A. building anew pipe -within -a -pipe along the existing route through Cedar River Park and Liberty Park and proceeding along North First Street; B. moving the pipeline under Bronson Way then connecting to the existing pipe; C. moving the pipeline under Second Avenue then connecting to the existing pipe. D. moving the pipeline under Third Avenue then connecting to the Metro Eastside interceptor along Burnett Avenue North; E. moving the pipeline under Fourth Avenue then connecting to the Eastside interceptor along Burnett Avenue North; F. moving the pipeline under Fifth Avenue then connecting to the Eastside interceptor along Burnett Avenue North. Q. Are the alternatives different from the ones selected for public presentation last year? A. Routes B and C were proposed last year. Routes A, D, E, and F are new alterna- tives. The new alternatives and criteria used to evaluate them are the result of cooperation bewteen the City of Renton and Metro. Staff engineers have worked together to determine routes that would best serve the planning efforts of both agencies. Q. What are the benefits of planning and accomplishing those projects jointly? A. North Renton s aging sewer lines and traffic distribution patterns require solutions within the next few years. If Metro and the City of Renton build their projects concur- rently, there maybe less disruption to the neighborhood and fewer costs associated with all of the projects. Q. What if the project isn't done? Will the aquiferbe harmed in anyway? A. The relocated pipeline will provide more protection for the aquifer because most of the alternative routes relocate the sewer line farther away from wells 1, 2, and 3, Renton's primary production wells. Choosing one of the alternatives would allow for a greater degree of protection should any break occur in the line. If a leak occurs, city wells 8 and 9, which lie between the alternative routes and city wells 1, 2, and 3, could be used to monitor and pump water before any contaminant could reach the primary wells. Q. Will the construction of a new pipe- line through the north Renton neighborhood cause damage to structures? A. With newer methods of construction, engineers can excavate and backfill without causing damage to nearby properties. Q. What is the desired project schedule? A. There are two possibilities for complet- A �li��lll�l N-laffill-SIM1.4 s� ing the project. One schedule would allow the project to begin in late 1993 or early in 1994, after public involvement and the selec- tion of the best alternative. Part of the new trunk line, east of Interstate 405, would be deferred until 1996 or later until I-405 im- provements are completed. The other alterna- tive is to defer all work until at least 1996. Q. What are the pros and cons of each schedule? A. If the entire project begins in 1993, at least some of the city's planned sewer and street improvements could be incorporated into the construction schedule. If most of the project begins in 1996, then the street and utility improvements maybe disrupted and the neighborhood would have construction 405 d � 1 Existing Route - A A. Existing route of 42-Inch trunk line B. Route under Interstate 405, Factory Avenue North, and Bronson Way. C. Route under Interstate 405, Factory Avenue North, and North Second Street. D. Route under Interstate 405, Factory Avenue North, and North Third Street. E. Route under Interstate 405, Factory Avenue North, and North Fourth Street. F. Route under Interstate 405, Factory Avenue North, and North Fifth Street. twice within a 3-4 year period. Q. How long will the construction take? A. The pipeline relocation would take about four months to complete. In addition, the City of Renton's sewer improvements would take about six months to complete. Q. What are the criteria used to evaluate the various alternatives? A. The criteria are listed below. No order of importance is given. • Aquifer protection • Construction impacts • Overall costs (city and Metro) • Transportation benefit • Utility right-of-way conflicts • Effects on city's collection system • Community enhancements wir mETRo Communications Water Pollution Control Department 821 Second Ave., M.S. 95 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 a► i'i'iETRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1398 DATE SENT: FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET L �/ � 'F /'-� g TRANSMITTED TO: j A V / 0 Cie / S T ENS e-?-i C Al To TRANSMITTED FROM: jt/jfJ,clivGj %W 1,6 F%Z 7 (Name) (Mail Stop) (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: (Including Cover Sheet) s (206) 684-1710 FOR INTERNAL STAFF USE ONLY:. PROJECT: el V C T,�U iC1 r�. P£Lc 14 7 r c 13 ARMS/TASK NO.: SUBJECT: 14�5r7-/.-/ j xfc T ,:�- S NOTES: E/T'd OTZTV89902 S33IAa3S 'aDH3 O8i3W OS:Z0 E6. OZ add CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT PHASE II MEETING NOTES 4/26/93 DAVID CHRISTENSEN, RON SCHINDLER, JOHN HOBSON, DAN BROWN, MANN-LING THIBERT -EAST END OF THE PHASE II PROJECT LIMIT WILL BEGIN AT WEST OF RAIL ROAD TRACKS (WITH MANHOLE AND PIPE PLUGGED), MAKE SURE WE GIVE ENOUGH ROOM FOR THE FUTURE JACK PIT. -CITY WILL HAVE CONSULTANT DO THE ALLEY SEWER DESIGN. CITY WILL SEND METRO THEIR CONSULTANT'S SCOPE OF WORK WHEN IS AVAILABLE. -DAVID C. WILL SEND METRO A LIST OF EXISTING MANHOLE INVERT BY END OF THE WEEK. -METRO 42-INCH D.I.P. PROFILE WILL BE A MIN. OF I FEET BELOW THE INVERT OF CITY CROSSING SEWER LINES, -THE PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE EITHER ON THE SOUTH HALF OR NORTH HALF OF THE STREET, THE CITY WILL NOT ALLOW CONTRACTOR TO SPLIT THE TRAFFIC LANES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION. -THE DRIVE LANE WIDTH SHOULD HAVE A MIN. OF 10 FEET. -CITY WILL SEND METRO A SET OF MODIFIED STANDARD SPECIFICATION/STANDARD DETAIL BOOK( SUCH AS IO FEET SEPARATION FROM WATER, S FEET FROM SEWER, FOR AQUIFER ZONE PROTECTION...) -CITY HAVE M.H. AT ALLEY INTERSECTIONS AND EVERY 400 FEET ALONG THE THIRD STREET. - METRO WILL PREPARE CITY'S 10-INCH PIPE ALIGNMENT, PROFILE AND THEIR MANHOLE/PIPE STUB DETAILS, THE CROSSING PIPES WILL DESIGN TO CONNECT AT THE EDGE OF THE PAVEMENT. THIS WILL ELIMINATE TRENCH CUT THE PAVEMENT THE SECOND TIME AND CITY MAY BE ABLE TO EXTEND STUBS INTO ALLAY AT ANY TIME. WILL DISCUSS SOME IN DETAIL. -CITY WILL PREPARE ALLEY SEWER AND STREET IMPROVEMENT DESIGN, THE ALLEY SEWER DESIGN WILL BE IN A SEPARATED CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPEC. -CITY STREET IMPROVEMENT AND 10-INCH SEWER PROJECT WILL COMBINE INTO METRO'S BID DOCUMENTS. EiZ'd 0TZTb09902 S30I a3S '65W3 0a13W 8S:Z0 EG, 82 �Jdd - RENTON ALLEY SEWER CONSTRUCTION WILL FOLLOW BEHIND METRO 42-INCH PIPE. - CITY PREFER WORK HOURS: 8:00 TO 2:30 P.M. -CHECK HOW LONG WILL REQUIRE TO LEAVE TRENCH OPEN AT EACH INTERSECTIONS? CAN WE USE STEEL PLATES? - METRO WILL COLLECT CORE DRILL SAMPLES FOR PAVEMENT RESTORATION DETAILS. -CITY WILL SET THE TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS FOR THE CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, REVIEW AND APPROVE BY THE CITY AND METRO. -ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW METRO WILL DO THE REVIEW FOR THE 42-INCH AND STREET IMPROVEMENT WORK... NEED A FURTHER DISCUSSION. -CITY WILL INITIATE A MOA FOR THE DESIGN RESPONSIBILITIES AND COST SHARING: METRO DESIGN: 42-INCH ,10-INCH PIPES, CITY MANHOLE AND STUB ALONG THE THIRD STREET. CITY DESIGN: ALLEY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM AND STREET IMPROVEMENT. COST SHARING: METRO- 100% ON 42-INCH D.Z.P. ,50t ON THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY- 100% ON 10-INCH PIPE AND 50% ON THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - FOR CITY PERMIT: METRO SHOULD SEND IN THE 50% DESIGN PLANS FOR REVIEW. - CITY WILL WORK WITH METRO ON THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN -CITY REQUIRE LOW VIBRATOR SHEET PILE DRIVER/SHOW IN SPEC. -CITY WILL SEND METRO A LIST OF EXISTING STRUCTURE FOUNDATION MONITORY POINTS, WHICH WILL PROVIDE BY THE CITY CONSULTANT. -CITY REQUIRE CONTRACTOR DISCHARGE DEWATERING TO THE INJECTING WELLS TO PREVENT EARTH SETTLEMENT. -CITY WILL SEND METRO GROUND WATER MONITORY DATA ,WHICH WILL SHOW SOIL COMPOSITION -CHECK NOISE VARIANCE WITH ARROW BOARDS?? -METRO WILL CORD DRILL TO COLLECT PAVEMENT SAMPLES, CITY ASKED METRO TO USE ATE FOR TEMPORARY PATCH AND PAVEMENT. Ez iOTZTV89902 S33IA63S 'd9N3 Odi3W 6S:L0 E6. 82 add -EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT SOMEWHERE AT PARK/FACTORY. -CITY IS INCORPORATED METRO PROJECT SCHEDULE FOR THE ALLEY SEWER DESIGN SCHEDULE. OT2Tb29902 S3JIr`•,d3S 'H5N3 0�J13W 6S:2-0 66. 62 ddd COUNCIL REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION J U L 14 1995 FROM: Marilyn Petersen CITY OF RENTON On 7/10/95, Council referred the followingPUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. Discuss use of mechanical tamping equipment on N Please respond by: XX Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor copy for Council and return copy to you.) lJt1 1 L. / / 1 'i/ 7.J LOG #: $ - ✓U � 3rd sewer project wit�PMetr V ,19' �s (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's (bgtary will Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor and include attached letter(s) with memo. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and return copy to you.) Prepare memo to citizen/agency (signed by you or your staff) and submit to Mayor for approval. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and return to you for mailing. Include copy, of attached letter with memo for Council info.) Schedule matter on Council committee agenda. XX When job is completed, return referral slip to City Clerk with all memoranda attached. PLEASE REFERENCE LOG NUMBER ON ALL LETTERS. Other Please complete request by 7/28/95. Thank you. Request completed on Staff time to prepare response Jj'�lw d f 5— Comments Signature Date CITY OF RENTON Earl Clymer, Mayor June 7, 1995 Mike Paulson Construction Engineer Metro 821 Second Avenue - M/S SC Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PHASE II Dear Mr. Paulson: The City is formally requesting that Metro direct it's contractor, Frank Collucio Construction, to remove the excavation spoils pile that currently exists within both City and Railroad right of way at the intersection of Houser Avenue North and North Brooks Street. All spoils piles shall be removed from this location within five working days of the date of this letter. Failure to meet this requirement will result in a red tag order by the City. Previous attempts to alleviate the impact to the adjacent single family residents have proven unsuccessful and as such, there is no choice but to either eliminate this operation or relocate it to another location that will not impact the single family neighborhood. The contractor may continue to utilize this area for its import stockpile as it currently is operating. Any significant alteration to this operation that results in unacceptable impacts to the adjacent residents may cause the City to terminate the use of this portion of the right of way for this purpose as well. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277-6212. Wastewater Utility Supervisor H:DOCS:95-494:DMC:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman Ron Olsen John Hobson Rod Schindler Rick Kokko 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 25 % post consumer d - Earl Clymer, Mayor May 4, 1995 Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E. King County Department of Metropolitan Services 821 Second Avenue -M.S. 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: RECONSTRUCTION OF ORIGINAL CEDAR RIVER TRUNK Dear Mann -Ling: After reviewing your letter of April 24, the City concurs with your concept for rehabilitating the existing trunkline. The only request that we are making is that we get a chance to review the plans at the 50% stage, as well as the 90% stage. Sinc ely, Jo n D. Hobson Wastewater Utility H: DOCS:95 -3 91: JDH: ps 200 Mil Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 t+ CITY OF RENTON ._ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator PA/pXA TRANSMITTAL MEMO P a May 9, 1995 Mike Paulson Metro FAX Al Et 821 Second Avenue South, M.S. - SC Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE PHASE II - PROPOSED NIGHT WORK Dear Mr. Paulson: Pursuant to your request to perform night construction work on May 9, 1995, your request is approved with the following conditions: • Notification of affected residence shall include provision of a work site (mobile) telephone number for the residents to contact a Metro representative. • All work shall be in compliance with the provisions of the City's noise ordinance previously submitted to you. • The contractor shall take all reasonable measures to reduce the potential noise impact associated with this night work. This will include the provision of screening and buffering of the proposed compressor from the adjacent single family residences. • This approval is only for night work on May 9, 1995. Any subsequent requests for night work shall be submitted at a minimum three weeks in advance of such work. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277-62-1-2- Sincrely, C WasteWodr Utility Supervisor H:DOCS:95-415:DMC:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman Ron Olsen Rod Shindler 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 25 % post consumer z z ZI THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS FOURTH FLOOR 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055-2189 FAX: 235-2541 To: Company: Phone: Z�Cv—�g7ZJ Fax: From: - .,�re— Company: Phone: Fax: Date: 5�q let s Pages including this cover page: (� Comments: oL-cZ 8-7-1 8-7-3 CHAPTER. 7 NOISE LEVEL REGULATIONS SECTION: 8-7-1: Motor Vehicle Noise Performance Standards 8-7-2: Maximum Environmental Noise Levels 8-7-3: Public Disturbance, Noises 8-7-4: Designation of Zoned Areas 8-7-5: Penalties for Violation 8-7-6: Content Not Governing Sound 8-7-7: Severability 8-7-8: Variances and Appeal 8-7-1: MOTOR VEHICLE NOISE PER- FORMANCE STANDARDS: The City Council of the City hereby adopts Washington Administrative Code sections 173.62.020, 030, and 040. C. The creation of frequent, repetitive or contin- uous sounds in connection with the starting, operation, repair, rebuilding, or testing of any motor vehicle, motorcycle, off -highway vehicle, or internal combustion engine, within a rural or residential district, so as to unreasonably disturb or interfere with the peace, comfort and repose of owners or possessors of real property; D. The use of a sound amplifier or other device capable of producing, or reproducing amplified sound upon public streets for the purpose of commercial advertising, or sales, or for charg- ing the attention of the public to any vehicle, structure or property of the contents therein, except as permitted by law, and except that vendors whose sole method of selling is from a moving vehicle shall be exempt from this subsection; 8-7-2: MAXIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL E. The making of any loud and raucous sound NOISE LEVELS: The City Council of within one thousand feet (1,000') of any the City hereby adopts by reference Washington school, hospital, sanitarium, nursing or con - Administrative Code sections 173.60.020, 040, valescent center; and 050, and 090. 8-7-3: PUBLIC DISTURBANCE, NOISES: It is unlawful for any person to cause, or for any person in possession of property to allow to originate from the property sound that is a public disturbance noise. The following sounds are hereby defined to be public disturbance noises. A. Frequent repetitive or continuous noises made by any animal which unreasonably disturbs or interferes with the peace, comfort or repose of property owners or possessors, except that such sounds made in animal shelters, commercial kennels, veterinary hospitals, pet shops, or pet kennels licensed as such, shall be exempt from this subsection; B. The frequent repetitive or continuous sounding of any horn or siren attached to a motor vehicle, except as a warning of danger, or as specifically permitted or required by law; F. The creation by use of a musical instrument, whistle, sound amplifier, record player, stereo, or other device capable of producing or repro- ducing sound of loud or raucous sounds which emanate frequently, repetitively, or contin- uously from any building structure or property located within a rural or residential district, such as sounds originating from a band session, social gathering, stereo. G. The amplified or unamplified human voice which unreasonably interferes with the peace, comfort and repose of property owners or possessors. (Ord. 3478, 11-3-80) H. Any sound from a motor vehicle audio system or portable audio equipment such as a radio, tape player or compact disc player which is operated at such a volume that it interferes with conversation or which causes vibrations to be felt from a distance of seventy five feet (75') or more from the source of the sound. (Ord. 4301, 12-17-90) 1191 8-7-4 8-7-8 8-7-4: DESIGNATION OF ZONED AREAS:` The EDMA (environmental designation for noise abatement) is hereby established as follows: A. Residential zones which shall include R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, G, T SR-1, SR-2, S-1 are classified as Class A EDMA. B. Commercial zones which are defined as B-1, M-P, P-1, are classified as Class B EDMA. C. Industrial Zones. I 1 and H-1 zones are defined as Class C EDMA. (Ord. 3478, 11-3-80) 8-7-5: PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION: Except as otherwise provided, any per- son violating any portion of this Chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and may be punished by imprisonment for not more than six (6) months in jail, by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment. Any person violating Section 8-7-3H of this Chapter shall be guilty of a civil violation and may be punished by a fine of not more than seventy five dollars ($75.00). Each day that a violation continues shall be considered a separate offense. The penalties set forth herein shall not be deemed exclusive, the City may obtain an injunction against such violation from the Superior Court of King County. Any ordinance of the City inconsistent with any portions of this Chapter is repealed except that any ordinance defining noise as a nuisance shall remain in full force and effect. 8-7-6: CONTENT NOT GOVERNING SOUND: The content of the sound will not be considered in determining a violation of this Chapter. 8-7-7: SEVERABILITY: These regulations are declared to be severable. If any section, subsection, paragraph, clause or other portion is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitu- tional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining por- tions. If any section, subsection, paragraph, clause or any portion is adjudged invalid or unconstitu- tional, or is applied to a particular person or use, the application of such portion to other persons or use shall not be affected. (Ord. 4301, 12-17-90) 8-7-8: VARIANCES AND APPEAL: A. Jurisdiction: The Board of Public Works shall hear and decide requests for variances from the requirements of this Chapter. B. Application: Parties seeking a variance from this Chapter, or a duly authorized represen- tative of the parties seeking the variance, shall file an application for the variance, which application shall set forth fully the grounds therefor and the facts the applicant deems material to justify the granting of such a variance. C. Public Notice and Hearing: The hearing for a noise variance shall be a public hearing, the date of which shall be not more than forty five (45) days from the date of filing and acceptance of the application for the variance. Notice of the time and place of public hearing shall be given and at least one publication in the City's legal newspaper, which publication shall be not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of said public hearing. In addition, three (3) written notices of such public hearing shall be posted at least ten (10) days prior to such hearing within, on or about the location which will generate such noise. Additionally, written notice of the hearing shall be given to any resident or property owner that will experience an increase in noise, or potentially have an increase in noise, such that this variance will increase the quantity of noise received by that property owner or resident. The burden of providing this written notice shall be upon the applicant. The Board of Public Works shall not consider any variance for which written notices have not been given, or grant any variance that would cause an increase in noise levels beyond that permitted in this Chapter unless the affected property owner or resident has been notified. D. Factors for Granting Variance: The Board of Public Works, in passing upon an application for a variance, shall consider all technical evaluations, all relevant factors and standards specified in other sections of this Chapter, and in addition thereto shall consider the following, none of which is mandatory for the granting of the variance: 1. That the applicant will suffer an undue hardship and the variance is necessary be- 1, See Title IV, Chapter 31 of this Code for 'Zoning Regulations. 1191 8-7-8 8-7-8 D1) cause of special circumstances applicable to F) the applicant's property or project, and that the strict application of this Chapter will deprive the subject property owner or appli- cant of rights and privileges enjoyed by others. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public health, welfare or safety, or unduly injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the location for which this variance is sought. 3. That the variance sought is the minimum variance which will accomplish the desired purpose. 4. That the variance contains such conditions deemed to be necessary to limit the impact of the variance on the residence or property owners impacted by the variance. 5. The importance of the services provided by the facility creating the noise and the other impacts caused to the public safety, health and welfare balanced against the harm to be suffered by residents or property owners receiving the increased noise permitted under this variance. 6. The availability of practicable alternative locations or methods for the proposed use which will generate the noise. 7. The extent by which the prescribed noise limitations will be exceeded by the variance and the extent and duration of the variance. E. Findings and Conclusions of Board of Public Works: The Board of Public Works shall re- duce its decision to written findings, conclu- sions and a decision. The written findings, conclusions and decision shall include a section noting the right of appeal from the decision to the City Council. F. Appeals: Any party participating in the public hearing feeling aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Public Works may appeal the decision of the Board of Public Works to the City Council within fourteen (14) days of the decision. The appeal document shall note the errors in findings or conclusions which the appellant believes are material to the appeal. The City Council shall consider the appeal and shall affirm the decision of the Board of Public Works unless the City Council finds that there are material errors in the findings or conclusions, or that the decision is not supportable by the findings and conclusions. If the City Council finds such errors it shall reduce its decision to writing specifying the findings and conclusions that are in error or stating that the decision is not supportable by the findings and conclusions. The procedure to be utilized by the City Council in hearing this appeal shall be as established by the City Council and should be substantially similar to the procedure used by the City Council in hearing and determining appeals from decisions of the Hearing Examiner which are appealed to the City Council. Any party remaining aggrieved by the decision of the City Council may further appeal by obtaining a writ of certiorari from the King County Superior Court within twenty (20) calendar days from the date of the City Council's decision. (Ord. 4330, 10-28-91) 1191 173-60-030 Title 173 WAC: Ecology, Department of (iv) Community service, (e.g., orphanages, homes for the aged, hospitals, health and correctional facilities) (b) Class B EDNA — Lands involving uses requiring protection against noise interference with speech. Typi- cally, Class B EDNA will be the following types of property: (i) Commercial living accommodations (ii) Commercial dining establishments (iii) Motor vehicle services (iv) Retail services (v) Banks and office buildings (vi) Miscellaneous commercial services, property not used for human habitation (vii) Recreation and entertainment, property not used for human habitation (e.g., theaters, stadiums, fair- grounds, and amusement parks) (viii) Community services, property not used for hu- man habitation (e.g., educational, religious, governmen- tal, cultural and recreational facilities). (c) Class C EDNA — Lands involving economic activ- ities of such a nature that higher noise levels than expe- rienced in other areas is normally to be anticipated. Persons working in these areas are normally covered by noise control regulations of the department of labor and industries. Uses typical of Class A EDNA are generally not permitted within such areas. Typically, Class C EDNA will be the following types of property: (i) Storage, warehouse, and distribution facilities. (ii) Industrial property used for the production and fabrication of durable and nondurable man—made goods (iii) Agricultural and silvicultural property used for the production of crops, wood products, or livestock. (d) Where there is neither a zoning ordinance in ef- fect nor an adopted comprehensive plan, the legislative authority of local government may, by ordinance or res- olution, designate specifically described EDNAs which conform to the above use criteria and, upon departmen- tal approval, EDNAs so designated shall be as set forth in such local determination. (e) Where no specific prior designation of EDNAs has been made, the appropriate EDNA for properties in- volved in any enforcement activity will be determined by the investigating official on the basis of the criteria of (a), (b), and (c) of this subsection. (2) In areas covered by a local zoning ordinance, the legislative authority of the local government may, by or- dinance or resolution designate EDNAs to conform with the zoning ordinance as follows: (a) Residential zones — Class A EDNA (b) Commercial zones — Class B EDNA (c) Industrial zones — Class C EDNA Upon approval by the department, EDNAs so desig- nated shall be as set forth in such local determination. EDNA designations shall be amended as necessary to conform to zone changes under the zoning ordinance. (3) In areas not covered by a local zoning ordinance but within the coverage of an adopted comprehensive plan the legislative authority of the local government may, by ordinance or resolution designate EDNAs to conform with the comprehensive plan as follows: (a) Residential areas — Class A EDNA [Tide 173 WAC—p 1601 (b) Commercial areas — Class B EDNA (c) Industrial areas — Class C EDNA Upon approval by the department EDNAs so desig- nated shall be as set forth in such local determination. EDNA designations shall be amended as necessary to conform to changes in the comprehensive plan. (4) The department recognizes that on certain lands, serenity, tranquillity, or quiet are an essential part of the quality of the environment and serve an important public need. Special designation of such lands with appropriate noise level standards by local government may be adopted subject to approval by the department. The di- rector may make such special designation pursuant to the procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act, chapter 34.04 RCW. [Order 74-32, § 173-60-030, filed 4/22/75, effective 9/1/75.1 WAC 173-60-040 Maximum permissible environ- mental noise levels. (1) No person shall cause or permit noise to intrude into the property of another person which noise exceeds the maximum permissible noise lev- els set forth below in this section. (2)(a) The noise limitations established are as set forth in the following table after any applicable adjust- ments provided for herein are applied. EDNA OF EDNA OF NOISE SOURCE RECEIVING PROPERTY Class A Class B Class C CLASS A r55 dBA 57 dBA 60'dBA CLASS B 57 60 65 CLASS C 60 65 70 (b) Between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the noise limitations of the foregoing table 'shall be reduced by 10 dBA for receiving property within Class A EDNAs. air (c) At any hour of the day or night the applicable noise limitations in (a) and (b) above may be exceeded for any receiving property by no more than: (i) 5 dBA for a total of 15 minutes in any one —hour period; or (ii) 10 dBA for a total of 5 minutes in any one —hour period; or (iii) 15 dBA for a total of 1.5 minutes in any one — hour period. JOrder 74-32, § 173-60-040, filed 4/22/75, effective 9/l/75.1 WAC 173-60-050 Exemptions. (1) The following shall be exempt from the provisions of WAC 173-60- 040 between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.: (a) Sounds originating from residential property re- lating to temporary projects for the maintenance or re- pair of homes, grounds and appurtenances. (b) Sounds created by the discharge of firearms on authorized shooting ranges. (c) Sounds created by blasting. (1990 Ed.) Maximum Environmental Noise Levels 173-60-080 (d) Sounds created by aircraft engine testing and maintenance not related to flight operations: Provided, That aircraft testing and maintenance shall be con- ducted at remote sites whenever possible. (e) Sounds created by the installation or repair of es- sential utility services. (2) The following shall be exempt from the provisions of WAC 173-60-040 (2)(b): (a) Noise from electrical substations and existing sta- tionary equipment used in the conveyance of water, waste water, and natural gas by a utility. (b) Noise from existing industrial installations which exceed the standards contained in these regulations and which, over the previous three years, have consistently operated in excess of 15 hours per day as a consequence of process necessity and/or demonstrated routine normal operation. Changes in working hours, which would affect exemptions under this regulation, require approval of the department. (3) The following shall be exempt from the provisions of WAC 173-60-040, except insofar as such provisions relate to the reception of noise within Class A EDNAs between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (a) Sounds originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity. (b) Sounds originating from forest harvesting and sil- vicultural activity. (4) The following shall be exempt from all provisions of WAC 173-60-040: (a) Sounds created by motor vehicles when regulated by chapter 173-62 WAC. (b) Sounds originating from aircraft in flight and sounds that originate at airports which are directly re- lated to flight operations. (c) Sounds created by surface carriers engaged in in- terstate commerce by railroad. (d) Sounds created by warning devices not operating continuously for more than five minutes, or bells, chimes, and carillons. (e) Sounds created by safety and protective devices where noise suppression would defeat the intent of the device or is not economically feasible. (f) Sounds created by emergency equipment and work necessary in the interests of law enforcement or for health safety or welfare of the community. (g) Sounds originating from motor vehicle racing events at existing authorized facilities. (h) Sounds originating from officially sanctioned pa- rades and other public events. (i) Sounds emitted from petroleum refinery boilers during startup of said boilers: Provided, That the startup operation is performed during daytime hours whenever possible. 0) Sounds created by watercraft. (k) Sounds created by the discharge of firearms in the course of hunting. (1) Sounds caused by natural phenomena and unamp- lified human voices. (m) Sounds created by motor vehicles, licensed or un- licensed, when operated off public highways EXCEPT when such sounds are received in Class A EDNAs. (n) Sounds originating from existing natural gas transmission and distribution facilities. However, in cir- cumstances where such sounds impact EDNA Class A environments and complaints are received, the director or his designee may take action to abate by application of EDNA Class C source limits to the facility under the requirements of WAC 173-60-050(5). (6) Nothing in these exemptions is intended to pre- clude the department from requiring installation of the best available noise abatement technology consistent with economic feasibility. The establishment of any such requirement shall be subject to the provisions of the Ad- ministrative Procedure Act, chapter 34.04 RCW. [Statutory Authority: Chapter 70.107 RCW. 83-15-046 (Order DE 82-42), § 173-60-050, filed 7/19/83; Order DE 77-1, § 173-60-050, filed 6/2/77; Order 75-18, § 173-60-050, filed 8/l/75; Order 74-32, § 173-60-050, filed 4/22/75, effective 9/l/75.1 WAC 173-60-060 Nuisance regulations not prohib- ited. Nothing in this chapter or the exemptions provided herein, shall be construed as preventing local govern- ment from regulating noise from any source as a nui- sance. Local resolutions, ordinances, rules or regulations regulating noise on such a basis shall not be deemed in- consistent with this chapter by the department. [Order 74-32, § 173-60-060, tiled 4/22/75, effective 9/1/75.1 WAC 173-60-070 Future regulations. It is the in- tention of the department to establish use standards and/or performance standards for the following sources of noise exempted or partially exempted from the re- quirements of this chapter within two years after ade- quate legislative funding is made available to conduct studies providing the necessary data. (1) Sounds created by aircraft engine testing and maintenance not related to flight operations, through the adoption of a new chapter 173-64 WAC. (2) Sounds created by construction equipment and emanating from construction sites, through the adoption of a new chapter 173-66 WAC. (3) Sounds created by motor vehicle racing events, through the adoption of a new chapter 173-63 WAC. (4) Sounds created by watercraft, through the adop- tion of a new chapter 173-70 WAC. (5) Sounds created by the operation of equipment or facilities of surface carriers engaged in commerce by railroad, to the extent consistent with federal law and regulations through the adoption of a new chapter 173- 72 WAC. [Order DE 77-I, § 173-60-070, filed 6/l/77; Order 74-32, § 173- 60-070, filed 4/22/75, effective 9/l/75.1 WAC 173-60-080 Variances and implementation schedules. (1) Variances may be granted to any person from any particular requirement of this chapter, if find- ings are made that immediate compliance with such re- quirement cannot be achieved because of special circumstances rendering immediate compliance unrea- sonable in light of economic or physical factors, en- roachment [encroachment] upon an existing noise (1990 Ed.) [Title 173 WAC—p 1611 206-609-3706 METRO WPCD COMM 234 P01 MAY r O • O� ux ta Ll. LLL1 tyl1 09 '95 12:51 Update MR - News about Metro construction in your neighborhood May 8,1995 Night construction work at North Third and Burnett Ave. N. scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday, May 9, 10 This Tuesday and Wednesday night, Metro will perform construction work starting about midnight at the corner of North Third and Burnett Ave.N. in Renton. The night work is necessary because construction crews must access a major sewage pipeline when flows are at their lowest volume. Some noise is expected as crews connect Metro's major Eastside pipeline to the new Cedar River trunk, a 42-inch pipeline that is being constructed in its new location under North Third. Metro apologizes for any inconvenience. Please call Ron Post at (206) 684-1143 with questions or concerns, or write to him at the King County Department of Metropolitan Services, Water Pollution Control Department, M.S. 95, 821 Second Ave., Seattle, WA 98104-1598. Post -It` Fax Note 7671 Date a r pagan From 0 Co /Dept. Co. Phone a Phone 6 Fax p LJ. 1) '1 r— l I Far +/ yX METRO King County Department of Metropolitan Services Clean Water -A Sound Investment 4%. A METRO King County / Department of Metropolitan Services Exchange Building • 821 Second Avenue • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684 - 2100 April 24, 1995 91953 E13 David Christensen Utility Systems Division Planning/Building/Public Work Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Reconstruction of Original Cedar River Trunk ARMS No. A65022; Task No. E13 Dear David: As you know, the sanitary sewer flow in the existing Cedar River Trunk will be redirected to Metro's new pipe after the construction of Metro's Cedar River Pipeline Phase 3 work is complete. The existing trunk will be rehabilitated for local sewerage use per the original 1991 Memoranda of Agreement (MOA) between Metro and the City of Renton. Metro's obligation under the agreement was to design and rehabilitate the abandoned line. The City of Renton is obligated to reimburse Metro for all design and construction expenses directly related to this work. Our basic design concept for the rehabilitation of the existing pipeline is to slipline a smaller diameter HDPE pipe into the 42-inch ductile iron pipe and reconnect local side sewer lines. The total length of sliplining is approximately 3,400 feet. It is our intent to bid and construct this work as part of the Cedar River Trunk Relocation Phase 3 Project in order to reduce the administrative costs incurred by both our agencies. We have already started the rehab design in order to meet the permit schedule for the Phase 3 work. The drawings and specifications for the rehabilitation work will be sent to the City for review and comments when the 90 percent design package is complete in mid -July 1995. Our planning level cost estimate is $345,000 -- $19,000 for the design, $292,000 for the rehabilitation work, and $34,000 for the contract and construction management. (Our preliminary construction estimates did not include sales tax.) Metro is tracking the design , e. A_ F.. ♦ t....nl_ l.. D l:t.,"on tol.. F .w tl,- Dl+ n.t na a /� eArVl lliltlireJ 10r 41V LLUaal� al�alu V/ll l{iLL Vll separate-1 �aVI) LVaal 41V 1 .= 3 ��V111 �ld VVut o construction will be identified as a separate bid item in the bid documents. We currently anticipate refining these numbers after we have completed our 90 percent design package. Our schedule for this rehabilitation work and the Cedar River Trunk Relocation Phase 3 Project schedule is as follows: Design Complete Advertise for Bids Notice to Proceed Cedar River Trunk Phase 3 Construction Window Original Cedar River Trunk Reconstruction Window 09/30/95 11/15/95 03/19/96 03/20/96 to 11/26/96 11/27/96 to 04/01/97 Reconstruction of Original Cedar River Trunk April 24, 1995 Page 2 Metro clearly understands the importance of the Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project to the City. We are streamlining our process to complete the pipeline design and construction as expeditiously as possible. I will be calling you in the near future to set up a meeting to discuss Renton's reimbursement scheme, any construction coordination responsibilities, and the release and transfer of the facility ownership and easements. Sincerely, Mann -Ling Thi Crt Project Manager MLT:sc/msk /- -11 �e� - cc: Roger Browne - 117 Bill Nitz - 130 Bob Isler - 118 Stan Hummel - 130 if , 41 i �1'1ETR0 King County / Department of Metropolitan Services Exchange Building • 821 Second Avenue • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684 - 2100 April 18,1995 91940 E13 Sally Anderson Washington State Department of Transportation Mail Stop 109 P.O. Box 330310 Seattle Washington 98133-9710 Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project -- Phase 3 Construction Schedule Coordination ARMS No. A65022; Task No. E13 Dear Sally: I appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and John on April 5 to discuss Metro's proposed Cedar River Trunk Relocation alignment section. This section will cross WSDOT's I-405 Interchange construction site near the intersection of Highway 169 and I- 405. Dan Brown and I also met with Joe Scanlon on April 11 concerning the same subject. The following summarizes the two discussions: 1. The City of Renton would like WSDOT to complete the landscaping project in the I-405 Interchange construction site and Metro's Cedar River Trunk Relocation as soon as possible. 2. The planting season is from October 1 to March 31. 3. WSDOT is scheduled to bid the landscaping contract in mid -July 1995, send Notice to Proceed to the contractor in October, and complete the contract by March 1996. 4. Metro's pipeline project is currently in the design phase. Advertising for bids will occur during November, and the construction window will be from March 1996 to November 1996. 5. Both agencies agreed it is not practical to landscape the area and then immediately excavate trench and pits for the pipeline construction. Even though Metro's contractor will restore the landscaping to original or better condition, it would waste public funds. To avoid a schedule conflict by both agencies, two options were considered: 1. WSDOT will sequence the I-405 Interchange landscaping work and hold the landscaping in the "horseshoe" area until after Metro installs the pipeline through that section. 2. Reserve a strip of corridor for the pipe construction. WSDOT's contractor will work around the corridor strip in the horseshoe area and finish the corridor area after the pipeline is installed. Washington State Department of Transportation April 18, 1995 Page 2 Metro prefers the first option. The open area will allow the contractor easier and safer maneuvering of its construction equipment. and will serve as an appropriate staging site. I recognize that this option will delay WSDOT"s schedule for completion of the landscaping contract. If our only choice is the second option, I would like to reserve a 50-foot wide corridor over the pipe and some space at the construction entrance, the jacking, and receiving pit areas. Please see the attached drawing. Please advise if you need further information or if there are tasks we need to perform to accomplish this schedule coordination. I would like to complete this matter by June 1995, before WSDOT begins advertising for bids. Thank you again for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely, Mann -Ling Zb� Project Manager MLT:sc cc: Barbara Bouvette - 122 Joe Scanlon - WSDOT David Christensen - City of Renton V / QP se- .. ...... . / ,:---, v '4....:... -- r Dm TO Re :::::..::._: i:'i:� - t' Pile <:. • \ F` Tr per ......._....:._ _.......:':.................... \\;\1^/� 1 i Tro _...... l ::: o ... : I / 7J soN�= I l... ... .'1........ - SD / 3 ........:.....:.... ................... -- ........................ .``���::'-:�'� .......... . . / Asoh. , }i - . c P / <c. v s 206-689-3706 METRO WPCD COMM 040 Pal APR 06 '95 16:48 11ETRO King County Department of Metropolitan Services Fax Transmittal Date: April 6,1995 To: Rod Schindler, City of Renton - (fax 277-4428) From: Ron Post, WPCD Communications (684-1143) Pages, including this one: 3 Rod: This news release just went out to the dailies, and I will send it to the guy at Boeing, too (probably by tomorrow). Work is supposed to begin late next week, which I guess means they will be in the street the following week. I will be roaming the neighborhood and staying in touch. 206-689-3706 METRO WPCD COMM 040 P02 APR 06 '95 16:48 Metro News A news release from the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 6, 1995 FOR MORE INFORMATION: John Gustafson — (206) 684-1414 After-hours emergencies -- 993-7909 Traffic Delays Expected From Renton Sewer Improvement Project Possibly severe traffic delays along North Third Street in Renton are expected during the next several months from a King County Department of Metropolitan Services sewer relocation project that will help protect the city's drinking water supply. M- etro is conducting the project in cooperation with the City ofRenton's street improvement project to North Third. Construction of a new sewer trunk line is scheduled to begin in mid -April and is expected to take up to seven months to complete. Crews will be working along North Third Street between Burnett Ave. N. and Factory Ave. N., then between Factory and Brooks avenues. Some traffic lanes will remain open during construction. To minimize traffic disruptions, the project contractor will excavate trenches in sections and limit hours of construction. Construction activities, however, may severely affect traffic flow on North Third. -more- IVA"METRO Ir Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, 821 Second Ave., M.S. 95, Seattle, WA 98I04-1598 206-689-3706 METRO WPCD COMM 040 P03 APR 06 '95 16:48 Sewer Relocation Project/April 6, 1995/2-2-2-2 Metro and the City of Renton agreed in 1991 to move the existing 42-inch-diameter Cedar River sewer trunk line to protect a critical area of the city's drinking water aquifer. Some pipeline sections were temporarily relocated in 1992, and the last section of pipeline will be relocated under Interstate 405 after construction near the freeway is completed. Concurrently with the Metro project, the City of Renton will move the existing curbs and gutters on North Third Street inward by four feet and replace sections of the sidewalks, The city will construct a landscaped planter strip along a portion of the narrowed street and apply an asphalt concrete overlay to the entire section of North Third above the relocated Cedar River trunk. For more information about the sewer relocation project, call Ron ,Post, Metro, at 694-1143. For information about the City of Renton's street improvements, call Rod Schindler at 277-6219. -3 0- JAG: 410RW&L Earl Clymer, Mayor May 19, 1994 Mike Bailey LDG Architects 1319 Dexter Avenue North - STE 260 Seattle, WA 98109 SUBJECT: SCUBA SPORTS EXPEDITIONS SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT Dear Mike: CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Enclosed please find the easement documentation for the City of Renton's sanitary sewer line along the west property line of the Pharr property. If it is satisfactory, please have it signed and notarized and return it to me. Upon recording with King County, a copy of the executed easement will be mailed to you. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 277-6179. Sincerely, ohn D. Hobson Wastewater Utility H:DOCS:94-507:JDH:ps Enclosure 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Office of the City Clerk Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 99055 Utilities EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, made this day of by and between C.W. Pharr and IoAnn Pharr; Project File # Parcel Tax Account Ws Grantor(s) Name RTSQ 19 ; hereinafter called "Grantor(s)," and the CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation of King County, Washington, hereinafter called "Grantee." That said Grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of $ paid by Grantee, and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do by these presents, grant, bargain, sell, convey, and warrants unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement for public utilities (including water, wastewater, and surface water) with necessary appurtenances over, under, through, across and upon the following described property (the right-of- way) in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: DOCUMENT FORM APPROVED BY Utilities Easement LznAL CITY ATTORNEY SEPT. 24, 1992 Sheet 1 of 2 c:forms/propmgmt/csmr/UT[LrrY.DOC/bh - PROPERTY MGMT. For the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing, enlarging, operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines, including, but not limited to, water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto without prior institution of any suit or proceedings of law and without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefore. Following the initial construction of its facilities, Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is granted subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Grantee shall, upon completion of any work within the property covered by the easement, restore the surface of the easement, and any private improvements disturbed or destroyed during execution of the work, as nearly as practicable to the condition they were in immediately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee. 2. Grantor shall retain the right to use the surface of the easement as long as such use does not interfere with the easement rights granted to the Grantee. Grantor shall not, however, have the right to: a. Erect or maintain any buildings or structures within the easement; or b. Plant trees, shrubs or vegetation having deep root patterns which may cause damage to or interfere with the utilities to be placed within the easement by the Grantee; or c. Develop, landscape, or beautify the easement area in any way which would unreasonably increase the costs to the Grantee of restoring the easement area and any private improvements therein. d. Dig, tunnel or perform other forms of construction activities on the property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on the right-of-way, or endanger the lateral support facilities. e. Blast within fifteen (15) feet of the right-of-way. This easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the parties, their heirs, successors in interest and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful right to execute this agreement. Signatures of Grantors: and and and and INDMDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at Notary (print): My appointment expires: Utilities Easement Sheet 2 of 2 Individual Form c: fomns/propmgmc/esmVUnIIIY. DOC/bh EXHIBIT "A" SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT EXECUTED BY C.W. AND JOANN PHARR TO THE CITY OF RENTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF A 10 FOOT WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT OVER THE (BELOW) DESCRIBED SUBJECT PROPERTY: Beginning at the most northwesterly corner of the below described subject property; Thence South 67° 15' 29" East along the northeasterly line of the subject property, a distance of 10 feet; Thence southwesterly on a line parallel with and 10 feet southeasterly, as measured at right angles from the northwesterly line of the subject property, a distance of 100 feet, to an intersection with the southwesterly property line; Thence North 67° 15' 29" West along said southwesterly property line, a distance of 10 feet, to the southwest corner of said subject property, said southwest corner also being a point on the easterly right-of-way line of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company (Burlington Northern Railroad Co.); Thence northeasterly along said easterly right-of-way line and along the northwesterly line of the subject property, a distance of 100 feet, to the most northwesterly corner thereof and the Point of Beginning. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: That portion of the north one-half of Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M., more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the monument at the intersection of Bronson Way North (County Road) and Railroad Avenue in the plat of Car Works Addition to Renton, as per plat recorded in Volume 15 of Plats, Page 47, Records of King County, Washington; Thence North 81 ° 02' 40" East along the centerline of said Bronson Way North, produced easterly, a distance of 284.57 feet, to an intersection with the westerly margin of State Highway No. 2, (Sunset Blvd. N.), produced southerly; Thence North 22' 44' 31" East along the westerly margin and said westerly margin produced southerly of State Highway No. 2, a distance of 477.19 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 67' 15' 29" West along the northerly line of the tract conveyed to Tino Cuigini to the easterly line of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company's right-of-way; Thence northeasterly along said east line of Pacific Coast Railway Co's. right-of-way, a distance of 100 feet; Thence South 67' 15' 29" East parallel to said northerly line of the tract conveyed to Tino Cuigini to the westerly margin of State Highway No. 2; Thence South 22' 44' 31" West along said westerly margin of State Highway No. 2, a distance of 100 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. 4/94-179.DOC/bh "'AMFTRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle • Environmental Planning and Real Estate Division 821 Second Ave., M.S. 120 • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 (206) 684-1165 • Fax (206) 684-1900 April 14, 1994 Mr. Mike Bailey Linardic Design Group 1319 Dexter Avenue North Suite 260 Seattle, WA 98109 ApR 181994 RENSON Erpoeer�ng Cedar River Trunk Relocation/Private Easement Dear Mr. Bailey: Please be advised that Metro has begun the appraisal process to obtain a value for permanent and temporary construction easement(s) on the northend of Mr. Pharr's property located at 255 Sunset Boulevard North, City of Renton. As soon as the appraisal is finished and reviewed, Metro will be seeking a permanent easement as well as a temporary construction easement from C.W. Pharr and Joann Pharr. If you have any questions please contact me at 689-5230. Sincerely, Barbara H. Bouvette Real Estate Agent BB.ce cc: Dave Christianson G:BB41194. Recycled paper I CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 1, 1994 TO: Jana Huerter FROM: Dave Christens SUBJECT: SCUBA SPORTS EXPEDITIONS The Pharr Building at 225 Sunset Blvd. North Per your request, the following are the requirements the Wastewater Utility would like included as notes for the site plan approval: First, that the applicant agrees to execute a 10 foot written easement to the City along the westerly property line for the purpose of our existing sewer line. Second, that the owner work cooperatively with Metro to obtain a 10 to 15 foot easement along the owner's north property line. We are currently preparing the easement document for the City's 10 foot easement and will submit to the owner for execution upon its completion. In addition, we have received a letter from the owner's representative agreeing to work cooperatively with Metro in regards to their easement. If you have any questions, please contact me at X-6212. H:DOCS:94-326;Mcps _1319 DEXTER AVE. N. LINARDIC DESIGN GROUP A SUITE 260 ♦ SEATTLE, WA 98109 TELEPHONE A 206-283-4764 FAX A 206-283-1293 MAR 111994 March 8, 1994 CITY OF REWOrl Mr. Dave Christianson Engineering Dept. City of Renton 200 Mill Ave So. Renton,Wash 98055 RE: B940045 Scuba Sports Expeditions (henceforth known as the Pharr Building) 225 Sunset Blvd N. Dear Dave, My client The Pharr Company recognizes the fact that in order to obtain a building permit within the City of Renton for the above referenced project, two things must happen: One, the proposed building must move to the west approximately five feet in order to satisfy the current zoning code issues pertaining to parking and landscaping. We propose to reassign the 15'-0" prescriptive easement on the West end of the property for a existing sewer line to a written 10-0" easement to the City of Renton. Two, Metro has said to The Pharr Company that they would like an easement on the North side of said property. Metro would have a option of a 10' or a 15' easement along the North property line (the current site plan shows a 10' setback at both the North and South property lines, The City of Renton has confirmed that a side yard may be reduced to a five foot dimension). This easement will include The Pharr Company's right to park vehicles and transportable structures. This easement will also include a monetary settlement to be determined and agreed upon at a time before an easement is granted to Metro. Also as discussed, an easement will be issued to Metro upon the Pharr Company's receipt of the agreed upon settlement amount and receipt of the building permit for the above referenced project. If there are any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincert Lin dGroup/Architects Mike Baily MB:Ib cc: The Pharr Company Marc Dallas, Metro City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Determination 8 Administrative Land Use Ac, SCUBA SPORTS EXPEDITIONS LUA-94-005, SA, EC, REPORT AND DECISION OF Apra 6, 1994 Page8 of 11 b) Water Utility (see comment Section E.1) c) Police (see comment Section D.1) 3) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Commercial; and the Zoning designation of Arterial Commercial. H. Decision The Site Plan for Scuba Sports Expeditions File No. LUA-94-005,SA,ECF is approved, subject to following conditions: CONDITIONS _Y: C/ �L In lieu of allowing five feet of the existing 15 foot easement along the westerly property line to be developed, the applicant shall agree to execute a 10 foot written easement to the City for the purpose of the City's existing sewer line. In addition, the applicant shall reserve a 10 to 15 foot utility easement along the north property line for Metro. Both easements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City and recorded with King County prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall comply with the operating permit requirements of the Aquifer Protection Ordinance and if necessary obtain a waiver from the Public Works Administrator to be allowed to locate in the Aquifer Protection Area if thresholds of regulated substances are exceeded. 3. An exterior lighting plan shall submitted to the Development Exterior illumination shall be properties. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION SIGNATURES be provided on the plans along with a lighting fixture detail and Services Division for approval prior to obtaining a Building Permit. contained on the subject property and shall not affect adjacent April 6, 1994 mes C. Hanson, Zoning Administrator date Michael D. Kattermann, Interim Zoning Administrator da fe SITERC.DOC �i ITIETRO King County / Department of Metropolitan Services Exchange Building • 821 Second Avenue • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 (206) 684 - 2100 tipni D, IYY'+ HrK b 1994 7V000 Y75 CITY OF RENTON John Hobson Engineering Dept. Utility Systems Division Planning/Building/Public Works Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project - Phase II Design Review Comments ARMS No. A65021; Task No. Y75 Dear John: Thank you for the design review comments for this project. The following are responses to the comments which we discussed on the phone on March 24, 1994: 1. In order to meet the City's Aquifer Protection Zone requirements, we selected 12-inch corrugated polyethylene pipe (CPEP) for all storm drain pipes. 2. We will add the existing water main into the base map according to the engineering map you send to Metro. 3. We understand the City's Sewer System Replacement Project will be delayed one year or longer. We agreed to revise our design and install drop connections in all sanitary sewer manholes located in the alleys. The "T" drop connection detail will be designed per the City's standard with the exception that there will not be any 90-degree bend at the outlet of the drop connections. 4. We will insert the City's Standard Plan Drawings including Catch Basin, Sanitary Manhole, and clean -out details into the project specification as reference. � N4A Pjd t-� .YMs{.t�b Cs/f 5. We will add a minimum 6-inch layer of crashed rock subgrade. I believe a 12-inch Ito AA layer, as the City requests, may not be necessary. My research indicated that most of C-L-A s the City's engineering drawings or as-builts use 6-inch thick crushed rocks for the city streets. 6. It is possible that the 42-inch pipeline construction will impact the nearby 8-inch sanitary sewer. Metro will replace it with a new pipe and pproperly connect all existing side sewers currently in service. We will eliminate the 11114 degree pipe bend at the location where this 8-inch sewer connects with Metro's 42-inch trunk and install a manhole instead. From a maintenance point of view, I believe one manhole should be sufficient for approximately 152 feet of line, and we will design the pipe slope steeper than the original slope to improve the current sedimentation problem. C.0 erNb v" John Hobson April 5, 1994 Page 2 As we discussed before, this review is to serve as part of the procedure to acquire the City's construction permit for the project. I hope the above summarized responses will meet the City of Renton's engineering standard. We will incorporate all comments into Metro's 42-inch pipeline design. The final design drawings will be sent to you as soon as available. Thank you again for taking the time to review the project drawings. Sincerely4-n �T�_ Mann -Ling Tniben Project Manager MLT:sc/msk cc: Dan Brown - 117 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 26, 1994 TO: Sonya Fesser FROM: John Hobson �w SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer Easement for Proposed Scuba Shop on Sunset Avenue North Please write a legal description for a 10 foot sanitary sewer easement across the west side of King County Tax Lot 1723059089. 1 have attached a legal description and drawing of the property. Let me know if I can be of further assistance. The Work Order Number is 89402. Thank you. Uf? Ala/� . �� zwel F to dilt !tea'^a Ave /ram CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: MARCH 29, 1994 TO: JOHN HOBSON FROM: NE1L WATTS SUBJECT: METRO'S CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT - PERIMIT INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEES I have reviewed the construction estimates for the above listed project, and have determined that the appropriate permit fee for review and inspection is $23,779.20. For METRO projects, we calculate the construction costs on the material only. By ordinance, the fees are based on construction cost, not what is inspected or how much time it actually takes to review and inspect a project. The portion of the project which will be owned and maintained by the City can be treated like a CIP project, and will be billed separately on an hourly basis. The construction costs used in the fee calculation are summarized in the following table. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL 42" DIP 2800' $190/L.F. $532,000 6' MH - 14-16' Deep 6 $5400 each $32,400 6' MH - 24' Deep 1 $8,600 each $8,600 Drop Connection 1 $22,000 each $22,000 Reset Monument 2 $220 each $440 Concrete Patch 367 S.Y. $30/S.Y. $11,000 Pavement Patch 845 Tons $96/Ton $82,000 Temp Traffic Striping 8,400 L.F. $0.50/L.F. $4,200 TOTAL $692,640 PAGE 2 The fee is then based on 5 % of the first $100,000, 4 % of the next $100,000 and 3 % of everything over $200,000. Based on the construction cost of $692,640, the permit fee calculates to $23,779.20. A portion of this fee was paid for review ($2,358.14), so the remaining portion due before the permit is issued is $21,421.06. Plan Review and the Inspection Section will need to review and approve copies of the plans for this project before we can issue the construction permit. Kayren will be the plan reviewer for this project, and Kokko will be the inspector. If you have any questions, please contact me at X-6178, or come down and chat with me. cc: Gregg Zimmerman Jim Hanson Ron Olsen **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt Receipt Number: R9401439 Amount: 10,480.62 04/01/94 10:36 Permit: C940075 Type: ENG ENG Construction Per Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 475586 Init: DB **************************************************************** Account Code Description Paid 401.343.90.00.0002 Sewer Inspection Approvl 5,764.34 000.322.40.00.0000 Right-of-way Constructn 4,716.28 Total (This Payment): 10,480.62 Total Fees: 10,480.62 Total All Payments: 10,480.62 Balance: .00 -E)uVETi C - �Ow PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 50% INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEES PER ORDINANCE NO. 4345 PROJECT NAME: CEDAR RIVER TRUNK - PHASE II 1. Estimate the total cost of offsite and onsite improvements for water lines, sewer lines, stormwater facilities, and roadway improvements for your project. Enter estimated costs in items (A) through (D) below. (A) Water $ - 0 - (B) Sewer $ 137,193 (C) Stormwater $ - 0 (Includes On -Site Pavement) (D) Roadway $ 112,160 (Street, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) (E) Total Improvements $ 249,353 (A) + (B) + (C) + (D) = (E) 2. Calculate 50% inspection/approval fee for total improvements, as follows: (F) 2.5% of First $100,000 of (E) $ 2,500 (G) 2% of over $100,000 but less than $200,000 of (E) $ 2,000 (H) 1.5% of over $200,000 of (E) $ 740.30 (1) Total 50% Inspection/Approval Fee: (F) + (G) + (I) = (1) $ 5,240.30 ` 3. Breakdown of 50% Inspection/Approval Fees is performed as follows: (J) 50% Water Fee: $ - 0 - 401/343.90.00.01 <A> : (E)Xm=(J) 5 764.3cl (I) 50% Sewer Fee $ 1/343.90.00.02 (B) : (E) X m = (K) (L) 50% Stormwater Fee: $ -0 401/343-90.00.00 (C) ; (E) X m = (L) (M) 50% Roadway Fee: $ 8 • 14 �000/-,3_43.20.00.00 (D) : (E) X m = (M) -7 6 ec� g 4. Check: Make sure (J) + (IC) + (L) + (M) = (I) 92-311.DOC/GZ/bh CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION North 3rd Street between Burnett Avenue South and Factory Avenue North; Factory Avenue North between North 3rd Street PROPERTY ADDRESS and North Bro . North Brooks between actory Avenue North and ouser Way North. DESCRIPTION OF WORK Reloca ' of ortion of Cedar River Sewer Trunk Line. Instaiiation of approximately 2,800 linear feet of new 42 inch diameter, ductile iron, gravity sewer pipe, with appurtenances. KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR NUMBER NONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Portion of NW 4 of Section 17 To nship 23 North Range , W.M. in City of Renton, King County, WA. PROPERY OWNER City of Renton ADDRESS 200 Mill Avenue Soutl CITY/STATE/ZIP Renton, WA. 98055 PHONE/FAX CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER Not Bid Yet ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP PHONE/FAX APPLICANT King County Dept. of Metropolitan ADDRESS 821 .2nd Ave. Services PHONE/FAX CITY/STATE/ZIP Seattle, WA. 98104 684-1 FAX: 684-1900900 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE FOR INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEES $249,353.00 50% INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEES DUE AT TIME OF SUBMITTAL WATER S -0- WASTEWATER S STORMWATER 5 137 ,193.00 STREET IMPROVEMENTS S 112,160.00 PLAN REVIEW FEE S RECEIPT = DATE This application does not constitue a permit to work . Work is not to commence until a construction permit is issued. I certify that the information on this application is accurate to the best of my knowledge and I will be responsible for any additional fees resulting from a different valuation. Signature A 41 R _� Earl Clymer, Mayor May 31, 1994 Mr. William E. Nitz, Capital Projects Supervisor Metro - M/S 130 821 Second Avenue South Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION AND NORTH 3RD STREET IMPROVEMENTS Dear Bill: Thank you for your letter of April 11, 1994 regarding cost participation in the North 3rd Street improvements. I have discussed this matter with our Transportation Department and received concurrence from the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator to agree with the two conditions outlined in your letter. This acceptance is conditioned on two additional items the City would require to be added to the agreement. These two items are: 1) If bids for the sewer work does not allow Metro to participate to a commitment of 50% of the roadway work to a maximum of 285,000, Metro agrees to reject all bids and re-evaluate other alternatives with involvement by the City and North Renton Neighborhood. 2) If bids for the sewer work allows Metro to participate to the full $285,000 for the street work but the bid for the street work is greater than $570,000, then Metro will agree to provide the City with the $285,000 towards the street project to be re -bid within the next five years by the City. If the City does not proceed, with the project within five years, then Metro's money would be returned. Please let me know if these additional conditions are acceptable to Metro. If acceptable, please include them within the proposed agreement currently being prepared by Stan Hummel. I would like to thank Metro for its continued effort to pull this project together. Your willingness to work with the City to achieve this dual benefit project is greatly appreciated. The City looks forward to completion of the agreement by both agencies. If you have any :stions o require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277- Sierely, TC hAW s e n v asewatV'Utility Supervisor H:DOL3`94-538:DMC:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman Ron Olsen Mel Wilson Rod Schindler Mann -Ling Thibert, Metro 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CONCURREN E DATE NAME[1NlT1AL*/DT,,7 May 27, 1994 Mr. William E. Nitz, Capital Projects Supervisor Metro - M/S 130 821 Second Avenue South Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION AND NORTH 3RD STREET IMPROVEMENTS Dear Bill: Thank you for your letter of April 11, 1994 regarding cost participation in the North 3rd Street improvements. I have discussed this matter with our Transportation Department and received concurrence from the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator to agree with the two conditions outlined in your letter. This acceptance is conditioned on two additional items the City would require to be added to the agreement. These two items are: 11 If bids for the sewer work does not allow Metro to participate to a commitment of 50% of the roadway wQ;�k Pto a maximum of 285,000, abik a Metro,1to reject all bids and re-evaluate other alternatives with involvement by the City and North Renton Neighborhood. 2) If bids for the sewer work allows Metro to particii ate to�the sfsull $285,000 for the street work but the bid for the street work then Metro will agree to provide the City with the $285,000 towards the street project to be re -bid within the next five years by City. If the City does not proceed with the project within five years, then Metro's money would be returned. Please let me know if these additional conditions are acceptable to Metro. If acceptable, please include them within the proposed agreement currently being prepared by Stan Hummel. would like to thank Metro's continued effort to pull this project together. Your willingness to work with the City to achieve this dual benefit project is greatly appreciated. The City looks forward to completion of the agreement by both agencies. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277-6212. Sincerely, David M. Christensen Wastewater Utility Supervisor H:DOCS:94-538:DMC:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman Ron Olsen Mel Wilson Rod Schindler Mann -Ling Thibert, Metro METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 April 11,1994 Mr. David Christensen Wastewater Utility Supervisor City of Renton Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Dave: Vlu %11 APR 141994 CITY OF RE D ON Engineering We have received your letter dated March 28,1994 regarding the sharing of costs for the transportation improvements for North Third Street. I would like to take this opportunity to attempt to clear up any misunderstandings which may have occurred regarding the sharing of costs for the street improvements. As you are aware, the sharing of costs for the street improvements was discussed at project level meetings and in meetings with members of the community, as indicated by the meeting notes you provided. However, Metro disagrees with the contention that Metro made a commitment to fund 50% of the City's street improvement project. In reviewing the meeting notes, it is unclear in the meeting notes who made the comments regarding cost sharing. The cost -sharing was discussed in conceptual terms, however, no Metro staff were authorized at that time to make such a commitment. It was our intent to defer discussion of the cost sharing responsibilities until a scope and budget for the street improvement project had been prepared. This was recently forwarded to us by the City. It was our understanding that by combining the route for the pipeline alignment with the street improvements that cost -savings would be available to both of our respective agencies. Our project budget includes $170,000 for street restoration, which was the estimated cost of Metro restoring Third Avenue after the pipeline was installed. Because of budget limitations, Metro cannot at this time make any commitment to funding more than the $170,000 associated with the pavement restoration. However, we recognize the importance of keeping this project on track for construction in 1994, and would like to propose the following approach: Metro will consider funding up to 50% of the street improvement project provided that: 1) Favorable bids are received for Metro's sewer line portion of the contract which would allow us to contribute additional dollars to street Water Pollution Control Department • (206) 684-1280 • Clean Water —A Sound Investment improvements without exceeding our total approved project budget for Phase II; and 2) Metro's share of the street improvements cost will not exceed $285,000. I hope this is a workable approach which will allow continuation of the project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding our approach, please give me a call at 684 -1287. Sincerely, Bill Nitz Capital Proj ct Supervisor cc: Bill Burwell Mann -Ling Thibert CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM z,J— DATE: April-$$,,1994 Rod Schindler , Dave Christensen SUBJECT: METRO PARTICIPATION IN NORTH 3RD STREET IMPROVEMENTS Attached you will find a copy of Metro's request for proceeding with both the Cedar River Trunkline relocation and North 3rd Street improvements with two considerations that they have listed. I believe that we should agree with their request with the following conditions: • If bids for the sewer work does not allow Metro to move forward with participation in the street project then the City has the option to require Metro to reconsider alternate routes. • If bids for the sewer work allows Metro to participate to the full $285,000 for the street work but the bid for the street work excludes Renton's ability to participate, then Metro will agree to provide the City with the $285,000 towards the street project to be re -bid within the next five years by City. If the City does not proceed with the project within five years, then Metro's money would be returned. I believe that this methodology or something similar will provide both sides the greatest flexibility. Secondly, given the City's revised methodology for street restoration, Metro's requirements would be less than under previous standards thus possibly reducing our ability to commit them to a 50% participation. Please review this with the letter and let me know Transportation's direction. H:DOCS:94-389:DMC:ps rP i/ ✓l t �l e �e2 � ��� �• � .; 7 �1 �s /S •u�� ��'�iG,QTiO � / / o�^�`.'q`�S`���C�• r%✓ fh P� �l`DAt/7"S 17 'He /1e/� 61—iCFid L� G "-e nl20 auTho/'iZ�� fp 3T��� a Ste% SNgit� �iiPr 3hoy�d Alel v hos aad "V 57'�rPe� 141/ Sfr��� ,'r1f��'odPmPrl�s ct C'arY�/YJu 7� �r r�9PP'rl�S 4r/�1 /.� �or,`va�r `j oii9Ps i 5 <! eo �Jrl�'i ff✓l7��7� �d� CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor March 28, 1994 Mr. William E. Nitz METRO 821 Second Ave. M.S. 130 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Dear Bill, In response to METRO's concerns for funding a 50% share of the transportation improvements for North 3rd Street I would like to provide some background on this area. Twice in the Spring of 1993, personnel from METRO and the City of Renton met to discuss the two projects. First at a leading citizen's house in North Renton and secondly at an inter -agency staff level meeting. In both instances the minutes (attached) from those meetings state that METRO will share 50% of the Liveable Streets improvements. Based on these earlier commitments to share equally in the cost of the street improvements, the City has in good faith hired a consultant to prepare the contract plans and specifications for the project. As you know these plans and specs are near the 90% stage of design. If you are unable to honor your equal share commitment, the street improvements would have to be dropped from the Sewer Trunk Line Relocation project. If the street improvements are not included in this project then a re- evaluation of alternatives with the community will be required. It is the City's position that a commitment was made to the community between the City and METRO to provide the street improvements as part of the METRO sewer project on N. 3rd St. Any variation from that commitment will require additional neighborhood involvement and a potential requirement to revise the current alignment. Please let us know immediately if you intend to honor your earlier commitment to equally share in the street improvement cosh) Waster Utility Supervisor cc: Harold Adams Rod Schindler Mann -Ling Thibert 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS PAPER CONTAINS 50% RECYCLED MAT MAL. 10% POST CONSUMER �0 3 1q.3 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. Seattle, WA 981o4-1598 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE SENT: TRANSMITTED TO : f/! !J ��/'� ! S T E7vS c� Al To AJ TRANSMITTED FROM: • (Name) (Mail Stop) (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: (206) 684-1710 NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: (Including Cover Sheet) FOR INTERNAL STAFF USE ONLY:. PROJECT: �C � A �l v C � T,� U .cJ ,�- RZ-Zc C/9 7 1 C � `7 ARMS/TASK NO.: SUBJECT: NOTES: CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT PHASE II MEETING NOTES 4/26/93 DAVID CHRISTENSEN, RON SCHINDLER, JOHN HOBSON, DAN BROWN, MANN-LING THIBERT -EAST END OF THE PHASE II PROJECT LIMIT WILL BEGIN AT WEST OF RAIL ROAD TRACKS (WITH MANHOLE AND PIPE PLUGGED), MAKE SURE WE GIVE ENOUGH ROOM FOR THE FUTURE JACK PIT. -CITY WILL HAVE CONSULTANT DO THE ALLEY SEWER DESIGN. CITY WILL SEND METRO THEIR CONSULTANT'S SCOPE OF WORK WHEN IS AVAILABLE. -DAVID C. WILL SEND METRO A LIST OF EXISTING MANHOLE INVERT BY END OF THE WEEK. -METRO 42-INCH D.I.P. PROFILEE WILL BE A MIN. OF 1 FEET BELOW THE INVERT OF CITY CROSSING SEWER LINES, -THE PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE EITHER ON THE SOUTH HALF OR NORTH HALF OF THE STREET, THE CITY WILL NOT ALLOW CONTRACTOR TO SPLIT THE TRAFFIC LANES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION. -THE DRIVE LANE WIDTH SHOULD HAVE A MIN. OF 10 FEET. -CITY WILL SEND METRO A SET OF MODIFIED"STANDARD SPECIFICATION/STANDARD DETAIL BOOK( SUCH AS 10 FEET SEPARATION FROM WATER, 5 FEET FROM SEWER, FOR AQUIFER ZONE PROTECTION.._) -CITY HAVE M.H. AT ALLEY INTERSECTIONS AND EVERY 400 FEET ALONG THE THIRD STREET. - METRO WILL PREPARE CITY'S 10-INCH PIPE ALIGNMENT, PROFILE AND THEIR MANHOLE/PIPE STUB DETAILS, THE CROSSING PIPES WILL DESIGN TO CONNECT AT THE EDGE OF THE PAVEMENT. THIS WILL ELIMINATE TRENCH CUT THE PAVEMENT THE SECOND TIME AND CITY_ MAY BE ABLE TO EXTEND STUBS INTO ALLAY AT ANY TIME. WILL DISCUSS SOME IN DETAIL. -CITY WILL PREPARE ALLEY SEWER AND STREET IMPROVEMENT DESIGN, THE ALLEY SEWER DESIGN WILL BE IN A SEPARATED CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPEC. -CITY STREET IMPROVEMENT AND 10-INCH SEWER PROJECT WILL COMBINE INTO METRO'S BID DOCUMENTS. Ei2'd OI2-ib89902 S30IAa3S '2i9N3 0813W 8S:2-0 E6, 8Z 2idti - RENTON ALLEY SEWER CONSTRUCTION WILL FOLLOW BEHIND METRO 42-INCH PIPE. - CITY PREFER. WORK HOURS: 8:00 TO 2:30 P.M. -CHECK HOW LONG WILL REQUIRE TO LEAVE TRENCH OPEN AT EACH INTERSECTIONS? CAN WE USE STEEL PLATES? - METRO WILL COLLECT CORE -DRILL SAMPLES FOR PAVEMENT RESTORATION DETAILS. -CITY WILL SET THE TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS FOR THE CONTRACTOR„ CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, REVIEW AND APPROVE BY THE CITY AND METRO. -ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW METRO WILL DO THE REVIEW FOR THE 42-INCH AND STREET IMPROVEMENT WORK... NEED A FURTHER DISCUSSION. -CITY WILL INITIATE A MOA FOR THE DESIGN RESPONSIBILITIES AND COST SHARING: METRO DESIGN: 42-INCH ,10-INCH PIPES, CITY MANHOLE AND STUB ALONG THE THIRD STREET. CITY DESIGN: ALLEY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM AND STREET IMPROVEMENT. COST SHARING: METRO- 100% ON 42-INCH D.Z.P. ,50% ON THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY- 100% ON 10-INCH PIPE AND 50% ON THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS - FOR CITY PERMIT: METRO SHOULD SEND IN THE 50% DESIGN PLANS FOR - REVIEW . - CITY WILL WORK WITH METRO ON THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN -CITY REQUIRE LOW VIBRATOR SHEET PILE DRIVER/SHOW IN SPEC. -CITY WILL SEND METRO A LIST OF EXISTING STRUCTURE FOUNDATION MONITORY POINTS, WHICH WILL PROVIDE BY THE CITY CONSULTANT. -CITY REQUIRE CONTRACTOR DISCHARGE DEWATERING TO THE INJECTING WELLS TO PREVENT EARTH SETTLEMENT. -CITY WILL SEND METRO GROUND WATER MONITORY DATA ,WHICH WILL SHOW SOIL COMPOSITION -CHECK NOISE VARIANCE WITH ARROW BOARDS?? -METRO WILL CORD DRILL TO COLLECT PAVEMENT SAMPLES, CITY ASKED METRO TO USE ATE FOR TEMPORARY PATCH AND PAVEMENT. E/E'd G1TJ.TbR99R7. S9�Tn?199 '?i�fJ9 n?119W F�:IA F.�, R2 Mr4H -EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT -SOMEWHERE AT PARK/FACTORY. -CITY IS INCORPORATED INTRO PROJECT SCHEDULE FOR THE ALLEY SEWER DESIGN SCHEDULE. F7/t7,-1 ST) Tt7MOOM7 c-anTAN-a(-_ •)4nki7 ON 1-11.1 Gc • )a G'G . G7 NaN 206-609-3?06 METRO WPCD COMM 417HY 354 P01 FEB 1? '94 1?:02 Post-tt" uimKJ Fax Transmittal Memo 7672 ._ No. of Pages 1 T�aysDatg Time To- D V r (Af - �t� � `5' F�E� 56-� From Company G ( T-(/ l C �,} O � Company Location� Location _ : Dept. Charge Fax o 1 Telephones Fax t lelephone i (4 Comments Original Disposition: ❑ Destroy Return Call for pickup Meeting at Versie Vaupel's house, Monday Mar. 22, 1993 (Cedar River Trunk relocation project) Present: Mann Ling Thibert, Metro Ron Post, Metro Dave Christensen, City of Renton Rod Schindler, City of Renton Warren Vaupel Versie Vaupel Marjorie Richter Ray Wautlet- . Catherine Wautlet Ron stated that there seemed to be agreement among all parties that North Third Street would be pursued as the alternative of choice for the relocated trunk line. Since the public meeting last September, the community concerns (or Metro's and the City of Renton's) have not changed. This meeting may answer questions about those concerns, and its purpose is to bring community members up to date about the design phase of the project. Versie and Ray asked about the possibility of the route going down Factory near the intersection with Sunset. Dave and Rod pointed out that excavating the street for a project of this nature was nearly impossible in that location because of the utilities underneath the ground and the traffic impact in that area. Community members asked about the City's plans for traffic improvements on North Fourth. Could these planned improvements happen sooner? Rod said the money for the completion of North Fourth improvements is not there at this time. The only improvement associated with this project is the narrowing of North Third. That is a real benefit, however. It was unknown what the impacts of this narrowing on other streets would be. Community members asked under which side of North Third the pipeline would be placed How would the costs be shared for curb expansion? Dave and Mann -Ling said the trunk line would probably go under the street where the fewest utilities exist. Indications are that t�sNnrtfciiiP ni'ii.i�ii .r.ir.l.�-�.r�►1. 1.�..• l�..�1... ...,...1.7 .,-„1,..1.1.. l.� �..-...�.1...t ........11.. l �� _. both sides of the street. Costs for the curb expansion would be shared ecu- y the City's Liveable Streets program and Metro. r Ray noted -that when putting the trunk line under the lot at the end of Brooks Street, crews should be aware of the large cement pillars and foundation buried there. There is also a city water line under Brooks, and a storm sewer under Houser that runs through the lumber yard. Ron will keep the lumber yard management informed of plans. Mann Ling said the survey of :North Third would begin soon. All work will be above ground- The location of all utilities and other facilities will help the design process. The design will proceed for the route along North Third Street from Factory Ave.. to Burnett eub-mdJ-J (Ub Mt I Ku 'Wt U) Lu'm -)n4 r'UJ! r tJ 1Y ' J4 1Y: IJj Ave.. The construction of the project is expected to proceed in phases, and North Third (but not necessarily Brooks) would be the first phase. Marjorie noted that accidents can take place if crews leave excavation holes open or the area is not properly marked during construction. She suggested flaggers as well as either fences or secure coverings at excavation sites. Dave explained the alley sewer project that would begin about the same time as Metro's project. The alley sewers are up to 70 years old. The alleys between Burnett and Sunset, from North Fourth to North First, will be replaced. A state grant will probably help pay for these improvements. The alleys will be resurfaced and new storm drains will be built. Rod said he received a call asking about underground cable tv lines on North Third. Those lines are in the air. Community members asked where the staging areas will be for construction equipment. That was not known. Dust, din and the location of' portable toilets for the construction workers are real issues for the community. Ron will let Metro's contractor know about the community's past experiences at the pre -construction meeting when it happens. Ron plans to mail information about this and other joint projects (with City of Renton) on new letterhead that shows the two governments in cooperation. SUMMARY of issues raised at meeting: The project will be phased. This phase of the project should occur in 1994, at the same time the City's.alley sewer project gets under way. Survey work will concentrate on North Third. Community members gave valuable information that should be included in design considerations. Some form of foundation monitoring by Metro and the City of Renton will occur, so that engineers can monitor for potential damage. To limit impacts on traffic, Metro's contractor will work specified hours and will comply with the City of Renton's traffic plan for the project. The minutes of this meeting will be sent to all those attending and this information will be summarized in the next mailing to the community. 'b 1 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor June 14, 1994 Ms. Mann -Ling Thibert METRO 821 Second Ave. M.S. 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Dear Ms. Thibert, Attached for your review is the City's final cost estimate for the N. 3rd Street improvements. If you have any questions before June 29, 1994, please call Dace Christenson or Harold Adams at 277-6223. Sincerely yours, Rodger K. Schindler Project Manager cc: Dave stensen Harold Adams 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS PAPER CONTAINS 50% RECYCLED MATERIAL,10% POST CONSUMER NORTH 3rd LIVEABLE STREET N. Burnett Ave. to N. Factory Ave. June 8, 1994 NORTH 3rd LIVEABLE STREET N. Burnett Ave. to N. Factory Ave. June 8, 1994 Quantity Unit Item Unit Price Unit Cost 1 LS. Mobilization @ 5% & Traffic Control 33,000 $33,000 1 LS. Removal of Structures & Obstructions $56,300 $56,300 882 C.Y. Roadway Excavation Incl. Haul $13 $11,466 160 Ton Crushed Surfacing Top Course $15 $2,400 335 1 Ton Gravel Borrow $8 $2,680 1.100 Ton Asphalt concrete Pavement Cl. B $40 $44,000 110 Ton Asphalt Treated Base $60 $6,600 8,700 S.Y. Planing Bituminous Pavement $5 $43,500 4,250 L.F. Cement Conc. Barrier Curb & Gutter $8 $34,000 1,390 S.Y. Cement Conc. Sidewalk $20 $27,800 960 S.Y. Cement Conc. Approach 3 Da $25 $24,000 26 Each Cement Conc. Curb Ram $300 $7,800 1 LS. Pavement Markings $6,500 $6,500 1 LS. Storm Drainage System $18,000 $18,000 1 LS. Irrigation System $21,000 $21,000 1 LS. Planting $23,000 $23,000 1 LS. Permanent Signing $8,000 $8,000 SubTotal $370,046 Contingencies @ 10% $37,000 Contract Fee Estimate $407,046 Use $407,000 NORTH 3rd LIVEABLE STREET N. Burnett Ave. to N. Factory Ave. June 8, 1994 Preconstruction Estimate $75,000 Contract Fee Estimate $407,000 Construction Control Estimate @ 10% $40,700 Total Project Cost $522,700 Earl Clymer, Mayor September 13, 1994 Mann -Ling Thibert Metro 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.F,., Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION - PHASE II ALTERNATIVE PIPE USE Dear Mann -Ling: At the request of the pipe supplier, Hobas Pipe, the City has evaluated the use of its centrifugally cast fiberglas pipe as an alternative to the City required poly -lined ductile iron pipe for the subject project. The City has evaluated the centrifugally cast fiberglass pipe from an aquifer protection standpoint only and as such, finds this product an acceptable alternative to the ductile iron pipe specified. This acceptance is conditioned upon the utilization of controlled density fill within the entire pipe zone to help ensure protection of this facility from breakage in the future. It will be Metro's responsibility to evaluate this product to ensure it meets the needs and requirements for Metro. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277- Sinc rely, vi Chris ee Waste tility Supervisor H:DOCS:94-852:DMC:ps CC: Ron Olsen Lys Hornsby John Hobson Larry E. McQueen, Hobas Pipe USA 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 09/08/1994 06:52 HOBASPIPE USA INC 713 321 7715 P.01 IHobo& Pipe USA, Inc. HOBAS PIPE USA, INC. c 1413 Richey Road l 11ousLon,'1exas 77073 tcl 1-800-856-7473 fax 1-713-521-7 71:; :x r -a n s m i t t a l to: r. David Christensen y a fax # 06- 235-2541 9 I from: mberly D Heffcriian date: re: pages: NOTES: j §eptember 7, 1994 1 I Mobas Pipe USA Relcrence List I including this cover sheet T I F Howtng, is the reference hst which you rcquested c>f' harry MC Queen. Pleasc fecal irce 1.0 cor)tact the 11' 1 may be Of furt1-wr assistance c [ f t ci _c IL R UME ikl LIST- - - �--- � I — HOb38 fVe US -A. Inc. NameTitle Telephone en W.B. Stanwick-Hay Sr. Assistant Engineer 904-630-7200 City of Jacksonville Public Utilities Department Antonio Almeida, P_E., Deputy Director of 214-670-8103 City of Dallas i Waste Water Engineering Pipeline Capitol Improvements FIAndy Goss Director of Water & 512-322-2916 City of Austin �j Wastewater utilities I Cindy Kavacic Sr. Design Waste 210-704-7171 San Antonio Water Systems Water Engineer GaryOradat. PE ; ! Manager Waste Water 713-652-6824 City of Houston\ Greater ! Design I. Houston Waste Water Program David Peters, PE i Technical Director 713-659-4644 City of Houston\ Greater Houston Waste Water Program Calvin Jin, P.E. Manager Sewer Design 310-699-7411 County Sanitation District of LA. County ! O\IeVAL.L_ \4�-YFw- m A m ! cn Address O a 3D N 2119 Newman. Marooco Old Jacksonville. FL 32202 m — c cn 1717 Baylor St., Dallas, TX D z 625 E. 10th St.. Austin. TX 1222 North main. Suite 904 _ San Antonio. TX 1100 Louisiana St. Suite 1300 Houston. TX � 1 ry r 1100 Louisiana St. Suite 1100 Houston. TX � 1955 Workman Mill Rd.. Whittier. CA 9W07 r KH 917194 SEP-07-1994 05:51 a P.01 Hobas Pipe USA, Inc. 1413 Richey Road Houston. Texas 77073-3508 Terry W. Andersort General Sales Manager Municipal Divig;On Office; (713) 821-2200 WatS: (800) 856-7473 Telefax: (713) 821-7715 Horne: (713) 975-0300 FA.cS)Y?% )L6- /ff4N5MIS5f5AJ �l A v,o I�t 4;;4,-Z-1516k)56-7'J (2e"i"i rr:) iJ tkl b-5r,, 5 l PL 6tz 6� fps 5 l C �o W` SEP-07-1994 05:52 Product Profile: Failed RCP INHERENT CORROSION RESISTANCE Major Benefit Of Hobas USA Pipe Description: Hobas pipes are manufactured from thermosetting polyester resins, glass fiber reinforcements and silica sand. These raw materials are precisely combined in the centrifugal casting manufacturing process to create a dense, void -free pipe wall composite structure that possesses superior inherent corro- sion resistance. Aci in predicts a 63, 000 year lire for Hobas USA pipes in septic setvice. Requirements: Chemical resistance requirements for fiberglass pipes used in sani- tary sewer service are given in ASTM product standard D3262. Per this specification, pipes are exposed to 5% sulfuric acid for over 10,000 hours while vertically deflected to very high levels. This is known as strain corrosion test- ing. The test results are analyzed per ASTM D3681 to demonstrate the 50 year capability of the pipe in this environment. f� Performance: Based on strain corrosion test results, standard Hobas USA production pipes' performance exceeds the ASTM D3262 re- quirements for chemical resis- tance. In fact, the corrosion resis- tance is so superior, that the ASTM analysis of the strain corrosion test data predicts a life of 63,000 years for the average pipe in- stalled with 5% deflection in con- tinuous service of 5%sulfuric acid. Since most buried Hobas pipes are deflected less than 3%, the actual expected lite in septic sani- tary sewer service is even higher. Benefits: Long, maintenance -free serv- ice life. • No costly add -on linings or coat- ings to damage, repair or main- tain. • No need for expensive cathodic protection or polybags to install and monitor. • Ideal pipe for economical relin- ing of corroded pipelines. • Hydraulic characteristics are unchanged with time. Conclusion: To reap the many cost saving benefits of superior corrosion resistance, specify and install centrifugally cast fiberglass pipes from Hobas USA. V Sewer Replaced With Hobas Pipes A failed RCP sanitary sewer line in the City of South Houston is being replaced with Hobas USA centrifugally cast fiberglass pipes. The project, the South Houston Replacement Interceptor, is funded by an EPA grant and con- sists of 1500 ft_ of 20" and 3700 ft. of 24'. Demanding Conditions Since the old lines were less than 30 years old and were dete- riorated so badly that in some locations the RCP pipe was com- pletely gone, corrosion resistance obviously was a prime criteria in the design of the replacement system. Structural integrity was also considered very important since much of the new pipe is buried under old, broken -up roads and as customary with EPA grants, leakage control must be achieved. With all these requirements in mind, the project designer, Ron Patrick of R.W. Patrick & Associ- ates of South Houston, specified PVC DR 26, mortar lined class 50 ductile iron with polybags and Hobas fiberglass pipe. (Continued On Page 3) Gasket seals between pipes and at manhole connections will assure leakage control is achleved. SEP-07-1994 05:52 P . 0:3 Mobas rIpo USA, Inc. Test Method Pipe rings were tested per ASTM D3681 at ambient temperature in 1.0 N sulfuric acid required by ASTM D3262 section 6.3.1. Test Results Designation % C Hours to Failure A 1.200 59,448+ B 1.200 59,448+ C 1.200 18,744 D 1.200 6,696 E 1.200 6,144 F 1.200 1,620 G 1.263 4,104 H 1.263 1,749 I 1.263 760 J 1.350 1,532 K 1.350 967 L 1.418 2,256 M 1.476 2,727 N 1.476 2,048 Q 1.476 1,310 P 1.613 0.5 Q 1.647 2,040 R 1.689 432 S 1.813 6.7 T 1.816 48 Data Requirements Cents Not Failed Not Failed Criteria Recuirement Hobas Piae USA, Inc. No. of data points 18 miz-:mum 20 Data point distribution < 10 hours 0 2 > 10; < 1,000 4 4 > 1,000; < 6,000 3 9 > 6,000 3 5 > 10,000 1 3 Data Analysis Per ASTM D3681, the log -log regression equation is determined for the data by the method of least squares defined in Appendix XI. The equation is: log (time) =-13.533log (U) +5.107 SEP-07-1994 05:53 P.04 !loss Pipe USA, Inc. Performance Recuirement Per ASTM D3262, for a pipe at 5% deflection to have a 1.5 safety factor after 50 years continuous septic sewer service, the minimum required 50 year extrapolated bending strain in this test is given by the following equations: Pipe Stiffness (SN) Minimum 50 yr. 36 psi .41 (t/D) 72 psi .34 (t/D) For Hobas Pipe USA pipes this converts to a minimum 50 year strain (E) of: Nom Dia (in) 18 30 48 72 Test Performance Strain (jj SN 36 SN 72 .835 .856 .796 .837 .772 .815 .758 .807 The 50 year extrapolated strain is determined by substituting_ 5.6415 (log of 438,000 hours, which is 50 years) for log time into the data equation and solving for log(%e) as follows: 5.6415 13.533 log (%e) + 5.107 log (%E) _ -.0395 50 yr.E _ .913% The value is greater than all requirements for Hobas Pipe USA pipes, so the chemical requirements of section 6.3.1 of ASTM D3262 are met (exceeded). pesicm Per AWWA C950, the maximum pipe wall bending strain is the 50 year test performance divided by 1.5. For Hobas Pipe USA pipes in 1.ON sulfuric acid environment, this value is: E, allowable = .913% / 1.5 = 0.609% Conclusion Hobas Pipe USA pipes meet (exceed) the chemical requirements of section 6.3.1 of ASTM D3262 and are therefore suitable for 50 year continuous septic sanitary sewer service at installed deflections of 5%. (At lower deflections, the long-term safety factor will be proportionally increased). U) m A A Strain Corrosion Data Plot 01 1 10 100 1000 WOOD 100000 1000000 Time (I -Ire) 50 y" SEP-07-1994 05:54 P.06 Baba: Pipe Ysa, Inc. Strain Corrosion Test Results HOBAS PIPE USA, INC. log (time) =-13.533log (%C) +5.107 Predicted Life of Average Pipe Deflection (-%) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Life (years) 42,000,000,000 174,000,000 3,500,000 173,000 14,700 1,820 299 61 15 SEP-07-1994 05:54 P.07 .® I'obas Pipes Rehabilitate Large L.A. County S.D. Sewer HobasAAAM11L ._ _ Hobas U.S.A., Inc, November 1990 Sliplining installation of Hobas USA centrifugally cast fiberglass pipes is proceeding rapidly in Car- son, California on the J.O. "C" Unit 1 Renovation project. The 66" diameter Hobas pipes are relining a badly deteriorated Los Angeles County Sanitation District 72" diameter RCP sanitary sewer. Because of the varied loading con- ditions, the project requires nearly equal quantities of class SN 1& Z75 and 36 (minimum pipe stiffness in psi) products totalling 13,880 ft. Demanding Conditions Engineering the renovation re- quired consideration of several critical issues by project designer, Lance Mariner of L.A. County S.D. Structural reinforcement to prevent future collapse was assured by designing the new liner pipe to withstand all loads alone, assuming the original RCP and the annular space grout to be fillers only, pro- viding no inherent strength. Since the existing line operates nearly full or surcharged much of the time, high flow recovery was paramount to a successful job. This was handl- ed by specifying only smooth wall pipes with a minimum 66" I.D., so the flow capacity would not be reduced after relining. The high ex- isting flow, also dictated that no by- pass pumping could be allowed. The liner had to be installed with the sewer "live" without disrupting operation. Specification of only Hobas or HDPE liner pipes provid- @d future corrosion prevention pro- L.A. County S.D. engineers watch 66" Hobas i being lowered into the sewer. tection, thereby eliminating that concern. Finally, leakage control was checked by a prototype joint design confirmation test, indepen- dent factory production inspection and tight field control. Many demanding conditions all address- ed by a tough, competitive specification. Installation Savings Capitan Contracting, the in- staller, purchased Hobas pipes over the HDPE alternative because of the significant installation cost savings. Despite the tight fit (70" O.D. liner into the 72" I.D. RCP), the high strength, smooth exterior Hobas pipes can be easily pushed long distances thereby minimizing the number of costly access pits needed. In fact, Capitan has in- stalled over 9500 ft. of pipe from just three shafts with a longest push of over 2,500 ft. Even at that hefty distance, less than half of the pipes' safe capacity was utilized. Additionally, because of the Hobas USA closure coupling, Capitan was able to insert pipes both upstream and downstream from each pit fur- ther reducing the excavation re- quirements_ The push -together, gasket -sealed bell -spigot joints re- Capitan places Hobas lining pipe into the insertion pushing machine. quire small pits and they assemble quickly. So fast is the installation that Capitan has inserted over 1,500 ft. of pipe in one day. Finally, completing the installation by grouting the residual annular space between the liner O.D. and the ex- isting pipe I.D. is easy with Hobas due to its inherent stiffness. With the high sewage flow diverted into Continued on Back Pagc SEP-07-1994 05:55 Continued From Front Page the liner, Capitan has grouted 600 ft. reaches successfully in one complete lift. All of these advan- tages have meant lower costs and reduced risk for Capitan. Hobas Superior With the installation now nearly finished, L.A. County S.D. has already enjoyed several benefits. Because of the extra competition provided by Hobas pipes, the renovation contract awarded was 300/a below the estimated cost_ The reduction in the number of access pits has meant less surface disrup- tion, less noise and less odor in the communities they serve. The fast installation minimizes field inspec- tion time. In future years, the Districts' will benefit from the high flow capacity of the oversized (665" to 67" I.D.), smooth wall (n .009 to .010) Hobas pipes. Further, Hobas pipes possess the highest ring load capacity of the specified liners adding long-term safety. And finally, the excellent corrosion resistance will provide years and years of maintenance -free service. As the Districts' extensive rehabilitation program gathers speed, their specifications will con- tinue to call for Hobas pipes. W Pushing Hobas pipes into the `live" sewer with very high flow. Hobas USA, Inc. ® 1413 Richey Road Hobas Houston. Texas 77073 (T13) 821-2200 FM 1960 N 1 Richey Road Houston Intercontinental Hoban USA, Inc. Airport 1413 Risley ROSC Houston. Texas »O73 C K A � O 61 N V) m CID ro- 3 j N < b a) C_ 0 Q Handling 20 ft. long section of 66" Hobas pipe weighing 2 tons with a boom on a front end loader. Ted Stewart Acting President Mr. Ted L. Stewart, Hobas USA Chairman of the Board, has assumed the additional duties of President due to the resignation of Carroll N. Sullivan, Jr. Mr Stewart will continue in both capacities un- til the position of President has been filled. Mr. Stewart may be reached at corporate headquarters as follows.. 5000 Plaza on the Lake Suite 380 Austin, Texas 78746 (512) 329-5051 SEP-07-1994 05:55 P . 09 Hobas Hobas U.S.A.,1nQ August 1991 A new, zero leakage sanitary sewer system is nearing comple- tion in the environmentally sen- sitive southwest Austin area_ The all fiberglass line, constructed with over 14,000 ft. of 30" (primarily) and 20" SN 46 Hobas pipes, Hobas tee manhole bases and L.F. Manufac- turing (Giddings, Texas) manhole risers is buried within the Edwards Aquafer recharge and transition zones- When completed, the pro- ject, named Sunset Valley - Travis Country Wastewater Interceptor, will conned those areas to the Austin sanitary sewer system. Zero Leakage Spec The long delayed project ultimately gained approvals on the basis of providing a zero leakage system. To assure this condition was achieved, project engineer, Randall Jones of Randall Jones Engineering of Austin, specifica- tions' required all pipes, after in- stallation, to pass a 5 psig air test for 1 hour without pressure loss. Also, each manhole must be water tested with no drop in head over 1 hour. Due to the stringent leakage spec only concrete steel cylinder, ductile iron and Hobas fiberglass pipes were allowed. Most Economical Installation contractor, Cash Construction Co. of Pfiugerville, Texas, chose Hobas pipes for this critical application for several reasons. The easy field length ad- justments, the lightweight yet sturdy design, the quick positive manhole Zero Leakage Sewe Built with Hobas Pipes Pushing "home" 30" Hobas pipe with the backhoe bucket. ._ L. F Manufacturing manhole riser assembled to Hobas encased tee base with Hobas FWC coupling. Hobas tee manhole base assembled in place. connections and the pustkogether, gasket -sealed, tight joints made Hobas pipes the easiest to lay. All of these benefits added up to the most economical installed cost. Additionally, Hobas USA was able to meet the tight delivery re- quirements necessitated by the construction schedule. No Leaks Despite the importance of the laying savings and the timely delivery, dearly the most significant benefit and savings to Cash has been the air test performance of the Hobas pipes. With over 8,000 ft. of pipe installed and tested by late July, all pipes (without any repairs) have passed on the first attempt without even 0.1 psi pressure drop - This consistent, high quality has saved countless hours, dollars and headaches trying to locate leaks and repair or replace the effected areas. Great Pipe Pipe laying has progressed at up to a 300 ft, per day rate. The in- stallation is quite simple as the pipe zone backfill is a dumped stone that requires no compaction. The entire system including pipes, tee manhole bases and the man- hole risers is assembled with Hobas FWC couplings. The City is pleased with the no leak perfor- mance and the added benefit of a corrosion resistant system. Cash Construction is enjoying a very suc- cessful job. Their management testifies that Hobas is a great pipe. d SEP-07-1994 05:56 Corrosion Halted in Tucson Sliplining rehabilitation of over 2000 ft. of 30" RCP interceptor operated by the Pima County Wastewater Management Dept. (PCWWMD) has been recently completed in Tucson using 24" Hobas USA fiberglass pipes. The existing line had sulfide corrosion so severe that two collapses oc- curred in 1990, one opening a 25 ft. diameter sink hole at a major intersection. Emergency replace- ment of those portions (400 ft.) of the sewer, cost nearly ten times more per foot than the sliplining rehab with Hobas pipes. Challenging Design Project designers, OPW & As- sociates of Tucson, had several engineering goals to meet includ- ing corrosion protection, structural reinforcement, adequate flow res- toration and I & I control. With these needs in mind, the specifi- cations allowed only sliplining with Hobas pipes and Insituform cured - in -place pipes. Both ofthese prod- ucts are constructed with thermo- set polyester resins that have proven corrosion resistance and superior structural characteristics. The leak -free Hobas joints and the seamless Insituform could pre- vent I & I and both met the hydrau- lic requirements. Easy & Economical For winning bidder, KE & G Development of Tucson, even though this project was their first sliplining experience, the installa- tion was fast and faultless. The Hobas liner, assembled with push - together, gasket -sealed, bell- spigotjoints, was inserted into the operating sewer in two pushes of 1400 ft. in 6 hours and 800 ft, in 2 hours. Due to the smooth pipe exterior and lightweight construc- tion, only 8000 lbs. force was re- quired for the 1400 ft. run. This load was only 10% of the allow- able capacity for the high strength Hobas pipes. Because of the (Continued On Page 4) Sliplining on Prince Rd. while traffic is maintained. ! r _ %BMW Vl(�: Pushing 38th section (760 ft.) into the flowing sewer using a backhoe and push ring. Austin Environment Protected Again Hobas pipes are protecting the Austin environment again as a part of the Slaughter Creek Inter- ceptor II project. The new 54" and 48" sewer, buried in and immedi- ately adjacentto SlaughterCreek, not only meets the 200 inch -gal - Ion leakage requirement, but is completely sealed so no sewage can escape. All Fiberglass System These lines, supplied in all 20 ft. sections, consist of 5,000 ft. of open cut and 2,000 tt. of jacked installation (without a casing pipe) including a crossing under the Union Pacific Railroad. The fiber- glass manholes are Hobas USA tee bases with LF Manufacturing (Giddings, TX) risers and cones (one piece). The risers are con- nected to the tee bases using Hobas gasket -sealed couplings just like the pipe joints. At the tie- in to an existing 48" RCP, a spe- cial Hobas bell, fabricated to match the RCP spigot, connects the pipes. Closures to finish the line were made using more Hobas gasket -sealed fittings to complete the all fiberglass system tougher Specifications Since the corrosion caused cave-in of an Austin RCP sewer in 1991, new emphasis has been given to this issue. Accordingly, critical considerations in the de- sign of this interceptor included corrosion prevention, leakage control and structural reliability. Because of these requirements. only Hobas pipes and RCP with 2700 T-lock PVC lining were speci- fied by the project engineer, Murfee Engineers of Austin. Lowest Cost Installation contractor, Oscar Renda Contracting of Roanoke, TX, bid Hobas pipes low because of their competitive price and the lower cost installation. The direct bury pipes installed quickly and easily using a dumped crushed rock pipe zone backfill. The re- sulting pipe deflections were all less than 2% with most less than 1% at cover depths up to 20 ft. The Hobas high strength, smooth wall jacking pipes are performing as expected with low loads on drives up to 600 ft. (Continued on page 4) Jacki Hoba pipes Unoor Pacif, 83 degree tee manhole base to connect RR bore to direct bury pipes. TOTAL P.10 M495� METRO / RENTON NORTH THIRD STREET PROJECT COST SHARING DATA / September 14, 1994 City Design Cost Tudor Design Cost $69,172.62 City Design Cost - Sept. 93 to July 94 $6,418.64 1] Metro Pipe City Street Total Cost 1 Frank Coluccio Const. Co. - Street Bid $322,230.00 Total Design & Construction for Street Improvements $397,821.26 Renton 50% of Street Cost $198,910.63 $198,910.63 Metro 50% of Street cost $1,065,507.00 $198,910.63 $1,264,417.63 metro ripe wiy btreet i otai Lost 2 Shoreline Const - Street Bid $272,298.00 Total Design & Construction for Street Improvements $347,889.26 Renton 50% of Street Cost $173,944,63 $173,944.63 Metro 50% of Street cost $1,183,546.90 $173,944.63 $1,357,491.53 metro ripe city btreet i otai cost 3 Tri-State Const. Inc. - Street Bid $376,880.00 Total Design & Construction for Street Improvements $452,471.26 Renton 50% of Street Cost $226,235.63 $226,235.63 Metro 50% of Street cost $1,104,891.00 $226,235.63 $1,331,126.63 METRO / RENTON NORTH THIRD STREET PROJECT BID TABULATION / September 14, 1994 METRO Item No. Item Quantity Unit 1a Mobilization 0+00 to 22+26 1 Lump Sum lb Mobilization 22+26 to 28+00 1 Lump Sum 2a 42 inch Gravity Main 0+00 to 22+26 1 Lump Sum 2b 42 inch Gravity Main 22+26 to 28+00 1 Lump Sum 3a Trench Ex. 0+00 to 22+26 1 Lump Sum 3b Trench Ex. 22+26 to 28+00 1 Lump Sum 4_ Foundation Stabilization 365 CY 5 Geotextile Fabric 2,813 SY 6 Monitoring Well 10 EA 7 8 inch PVC Sewer 3+68 to 5+22 1 Lump Sum 8 12 inch Storm Drain CPEP Pie 1 Lump Sum 9a ACP Cl B Patch 473 TON 9b CCP 14 Day, 9 inch 367 SY 9c ATB 5 inch 592 TON 9d Crushed Surfacing Base 6 inch 7451 TON IN:10111ri1kl Item No. Item Quantity Unit 1 Mobilization 1 Lump Sum 2 Removal of Str. & Obstr. 1 Lump Sum 3 Rdwy Ex. 882 CY 4 _ CSTC 160 TON 5 Gravel Borrow 335 TON 6 ACP Cl B 1,100 TON 7 ATB 110 TON 8 Planing 8,700 SY 9 Curb & Gutter 4,250 LF 10 Sidewalk 1,390 SY 11 Driveway 960 SY 12 Curb Ramp 26 EA 13 Pav't Markings 1 Lump Sum 14 Drainage 1 Lump Sum 15 Irrigation 1 Sum 16 Planting 1 -Lump Lump Sum 17 Signing 1 Lump Sum Frank Coluccio Const. Co. Unit Price Total $55,300.00 $55,300.00 $500.00 $500.00 $722,207.90 $722,207.90 $147,000.00 $147,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000,00 $1, 500.00 $1, 500.00 $10.00 $3,650.00 $0.70 $1,969.10 $1,000,00 $10,000.00 $17,600.00 $17,600.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $50.00 $23,650.00 $35.00 $12,845.00 $50.00 $29,600.00 $13.00 $9,685.00 $1,065,507.00 Unit Price Total $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $41,000.00 $41,000.00 $20.00 $17,640.00 $20.00 $3.200.00 $20.00 $6,700.00 $35.00 $38,500.00 $47.00 $5,170.00 $1.90 $16,530.00 $7.15 $30,387.50 $17.75 $24,672.50 $23.00 $22,080.00 $275.00 $7,150.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $3,200.00 $3,200.00 $322,230.00 ACTUAL $1,387,737.00 Shoreline Construction Co Unit Price Total $83,900.00 $83,900.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $756,000.00 $756.000.00 $165, 000.00 $165, 000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $30.00 $10,950.00 $2.50 $7,032.50 $1, 200.00 $12, 000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000,00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $67.00 $31,691.00 $37.00 $13,579.00 $53.20 _ $31,494,40 $20.00 $14,900,00 $1,183,546,90 Unit Price Total $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 $9.50 $8,379.00 $30.00 $4,800.00 $11.50 $3,852.50 $41.60 $45,760.00 $57.60 $6,336.00 $1.40 $12,180,00 $7.60 $32,300.00 $17.15 $23,838.50 $21.20 $20,35200 $300.00 $7,800.00 $5,700.00 $5,700.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $272,298.00 $1,455,844,90 Tri-State Construction. Inc. Unit Price Total $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $10,000.00 _ $10,000.00 $685,000.00 $685,000.00 $180, 000.00 $180. 000.00 $25,000.00 $25.000.00 $2,000.00 $2.000.00 $10.00 $3.650.00 $2.00 _ $5,626.00 $400.00 _ $4,000.00 $15, 000.00 $15, 000.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $75.00 $35,475.00 $40.00 $14,680.00 $50.00 $29,600.00 _ $28.00 $20,860.00 $1,104,891.00 Unit Price Total $25,000.00 _ $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $40.00 $35,280.00 $50.00 $8,000.00 $20.00 $6,700.00 $75.00 $82,500.00 $50.00 $5,500.00 $5.00 $43,500.00 $7.00 $29,750.00 $15.00 $20,850.00 $24.00 $23,040.00 $260.00 $6,760.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $376,880.00 $1,481,771.00 BID $1,387,737.00 $1,455,844,00 $1,497,771.00 V BID TABULATION SHEET Contract: Metro/Renton North Third Street Project, Cedar River Trunk Relocation - Phase 2, North Third Livable Street Improvements, Contract T/M7-94 Submittal Deadline: September 14, 1994 - 10:00 a.m. - Conference Room 2C Addenda Issued: 3 /S S^ 7�7 �r � Ch FIRM TOTAL BID 1 R.L. Alia Company 7, 2 Volker Stevin Pacific Inc. 4-1. %, Z 71 SY 3 Frank Coluccio Construction, Inc. % , / 3 7, 73 7 4 Tri-State Constuction, Inc. 3 • el'? 7, 7 71 5 Robison Construction, Inc. �o • �� 0 6 Shoreline Construction Co. l 7 SS y/ 7 Active Construction, Inc. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: APPARENT LOW BIDDER: Verified as accurate by: Janet Quimby, Senior Contracts Specialist - METRO King County / Department of Metropolitan Services Exchange Building • 821 Second Avenue • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684 - 2100 February 27, 1995 W/M 7-3 Mr. Frank Coluccio Frank Coluccio Construction Company 9600 M.L. King Jr. Way S Seattle, WA 98118 Cedar River Trunk - Phase H Metro Contract W/M 7-94 Construction Progress Dear Mr. Coluccio: A month has lapsed since the notice to proceed on the subject contract was issued effective January 23. To date only two submittals have been received. These pertained to shoring systems and precast concrete manholes. . The contract specifications require that a construction schedule -section 01310, submittal - control document -section 01300 and accident prevention program -section 01063 be - - submitted prior to the start of construction or within 14 days of the effective date of the notice to proceed in the case of the schedule submittal. - Please inform Metro, in writing, by March 6 of the anticipated start date of the phase 1_ = portion of the scope of work and when Metro can expect receipt of required submittals and construction schedule. Very truly yours, Michael A. Paulson Construction Management IV MAP:map cc: Mann -Ling Thibert, 117 Eddie Tate, 130 Willie Winston, 107 Ron Schindler, City of Renton Greg Suko, SC Sheldon Teel, SC Dan Nwaelele, 130 File c c. WILR Earl Clymer, Mayor March 3, 1995 Mann -Ling Thibert Metro 821 Second Avenue - M/S 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PHASE III Dear Mann -Ling: The City's Engineering and Maintenance Departments have reviewed the proposed alignment for Metro's Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Phase III pipe and find it acceptable. The Parks Department has informed me that they will be sending a letter to you approving the alignment. Sincerely, Jo n D. Hobson Wastewater Utility H: DOCS:95-200:JDH: ps 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 m METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 January 18,1995 Dave Christensen Wastewater Utility Supervisor 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 JAN 2 3 i9-95 CITY OF RENTON Engineering ^ept. SUBJECT: Utilities Cooperation Agreement for the Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Phase II/ North Third Livable Street Improvements Dear Dave: We have signatures! Enclosed is a signed and executed utilities agreement for the Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Phase II/North Third Livable Street Improvement project. Thanks for your help in putting this agreement together. We look forward to getting started on the project and a close working relationship with the City during construction. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Stan Hummel Water Quality Engineer enclosure Water Pollution Control Department • (206) 684-1280 • Clean Water —A Sound Investment relocation project Update Cedar River Trunk relocation project begins in January Metro will relocate a large sewer trunk line to North Third Street beginning in January, 1995. The project will occur in conjunction with the City of Renton's street improvements to North Third Street. Construction is expected to take about seven months. Metro's pipeline will be constructed along North Third between Burnett Ave.N. and Fac- tory Ave. N., then under Factory between Fac- tory and Brooks, and under Brooks to Houser Way (see map on reverse). Construction activities may severely impact traffic flow on North Third. Metro's community relations staff will notify residents and local businesses prior to construction activities. Some lanes will remain open to traffic during the construction period. Hours of construction will be arranged io minimize disruption of traffic. Construction trenches will be excavated in sections along North Third to minimize impact on the commuter route. Why is Metro moving the pipeline? Metro and the City of Renton agreed in 1991 to move the existing 42-inch Cedar River Trunk to protect a critical area of the City of Renton's drinking water aquifer. Some sections of the pipeline were temporarily relocated in 1992, and the last section of pipeline will be ':"METRO January 1995 relocated under the freeway after construction work along I-405 is completed. What improvements will occur to North Third Street? The City of Renton will move the existing curbs and gutters inward by four feet on each side of North Third and replace sections of the existing sidewalks. A landscaped planter strip will be constructed along a portion of the nar- rowed street and an asphalt concrete overlay will be applied to the entire section of North Third above the relocated Cedar River trunk. Want more information? If you have questions about the pipeline relocation project, please call Ron Post, King County Department of Metropolitan Services, at 684-1143. You can also write to him at Metro, 821 Second Ave., M.S. 95, Seattle, WA 98104-1598. If you have questions about the City of Renton's street improvements, please call Rod Schindler at 277-6219 or write to him at the City of Renton, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. S., Renton, WA 98055. Y ��NT0, Z IIJ t Q - N IN 14thl t H4 nn m roject Alignment 3rd �t PHASE II - -� LJ nd �UU 'st Q ❑ yO O� C+ t k e - LIBERTY IT�PARK f People with disabilities who need the information in this brochure in accessible formats may call 684-2046 (voice) or 689-3413 (TTY/TDD. CEDAR RIVER PARK CEDAR RIVER TRUNK - PHASE II METRO CONTRACT W/M 7-94 Pre -Construction Conference January 4, 1995 NAME DES ORGANIZATION TELEPHONE jl-,- Zt ✓ rO i <Gt - �Ga- Zz V0 �r✓� - r �7 f�, s �l/ ��/ - 3 /Z Q L CrFcZrs��GLc_ %6? -%6O 1A ��P � LC L)e i e Uca aS 7 - 3ci4 c CEDAR RIVER TRUNK - PHASE II METRO CONTRACT W/M 7-94 Pre -Construction Conference January 4, 1995 NAME ORGANIZATION TELEPHONE r� y� Cedar River Trunk - Phase II Metro Contract W/M 7-94 Pre -Construction Conference Wednesday, January 4, 1994 Contract Awarded To: Frank Coluccio Construction Contract Amount: $1,387,737 Number of Days: 250 Date of "Notice to Proceed": Liquidated Damages: 5450.00 per day AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Contract Administration Letter a. Progress Payment b. Retainage C. Sales Tax 3. M/WBE and EEO Requirements 4. Health And Safety 5. Coordination of Work with Appropriate Parties 6. Working Hours 7. Project Schedule a. Format b. Details 8. Environmental Controls a. General b. Industrial Waste Departure of those with no further concerns 9. Contract Technical Specifications 10. Open Discussion '@METRO ir King County / Department of Metropolitan Services Exchange Building • 821 Second Avenue • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684 - 2100 December 16, 1994 W/M 7-1 Mr. Frank Coluccio Frank Colucciuo Construction Company 9600 M.L. King Jr. Way S Seattle, WA 98118 Cedar River Trunk - Phase II Metro Contract WITH 7-94 Pre -Construction Conference Dear Mr. Coluccio: A pre -construction conference is scheduled for I PM on Wednesday January 4, 1995; in the Metro Safety and Training Center (Building A), 11911 E. Marginal Way S, Seattle, Washington. Attendance by your representatives and subcontractors is requested. Among the topics of discussion will be: • Coordination of work with appropriate parties • M/WBE, EEO requirements • Working hours • Project schedule • Environmental control requirements • Administrative requirements • General construction requirements Very truly yours, Michael A. Paulson Construction Management IV MAP:rak cc: Mann -Ling Thibert, 117 Eddie Tate, 130 Willie Winston, 107 Ron Post, 95 Stan Hummel, 130 File Greg Suko, SC Sheldon Teel, SC Elsie Hulsizer, IHW Dan Nwaelele, 130 Ron Schindler, City of Renton �� METRO Ydng County Department of Metropolitan Services Contracts M.S. 125 Exchange Building • 821 Second Avenue • Seattle, Washington 98104-1598 • (206) 684-1327 VIA FAX AND UPS GROUND January 20,1995 Mr. Frank Coluccio, President Frank Coluccio Construction Company 9600 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way So. Seattle, Washington 98118 J AN 2 5 C�, I QI. RENTGN Engineering Dept Notice to Proceed, Metro/Renton North Third Street Project, Contract W/M7-94 Dear Mr. Coluccio: Frank Coluccio Construction Company ("FCCC") is hereby notified to proceed effective January 23, 1995, with the work defined in bidding schedule M and bidding schedule R under Contract W/M7-94 and prosecute the work with such diligence that all work is completed and ready for use within the Contract Time set forth in the Contract Documents. Metro has finalized the cost sharing agreement for the work described in bidding schedule R with the City of Renton and it has been executed by both parties. FCCC is therefore authorized to proceed with the entire work described in the Contract Documents. The Engineer assigned to this Contract is Mr. Sheldon Teel (206) 684-2240. The M/WBE Contract Compliance Specialist assigned to this Contract is Mr. Willie Winston, Jr. (206) 684-1373. Counterpart Copy No. 2 of the Contract is enclosed for your file. Also enclosed is the bid guaranty submitted by Frank Coluccio Construction Company. V5trul yours, r Victor C. Oblas, P.E. Director of Technical Services VCO:mh Enclosure N�&"` METR0 s3 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 96104-1598 FACOXHILM—TAP ONOXX0010N COVZR SEEN DATE SENT: TRANSMITTED TO:, 24VE TRANSMITTED FROM: (Name) (Mail Stop) kPq- (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: (206) 684-1710 NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: (Including Cover Sheet) FOR LNTERNAL STAFF US ONLY: PROJECT: ARMS/TASK NO.: SUBJECT: NOTES : E/T'd 0TLTb09902 S=A�= '6DN3 0613W 2E:9T E6, E2 93d CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PHASE II TASK NO:Y75 PROJECT:A65021 PROJECT SCHEDULE AS FOR 2/16/1993 TASK PR —DESIGN PHASE Draft Engineering Report Report Review & Comments Environmental Checklist/ SEPA Survey Request Soil Investigation Traffic Study Negotiate/Obtain Permits DESIGN PHASE DRAFT DURATION EXPECTED DATES --- ---- to 2 /8/93 13 days 2/16/93 to 3/5/93 3 mos. 6/15/93 to 9/11/93 45 20 29 5 mos. 30% Pipe Design & Spec. 30% Design Review & Comments 90% pipe Design & Spec. 90% Design Review & Comments ('onst ruct ion Cost Estimates Request Division O Finai riAeir3n Raeris�nn 40 days 14 22 14 5 20 15 3/15/93 to 5/1/93 3/l/93 to 4/1/93 3/1/93 to 4/15/93 12/1/93 to 5/15/94 4/15/93 to 6/15/93 6/16/93 to 6/30/93 7/1/93 to 8/2/93 8/5/93 to 8/19/93 9/33/93 to 9/27/93 8/5/93 to 9/3/91 9/6/93 to 9/27/93 CiZ'd OTZTV69902 S33IAN3S *85N3 Odi3W 2E:9T C6, EZ Q3d nDG�G PRE -CONSTRUCTION PHASE TASK DURATION EXPECTED DATES Print Bid Documents 5 days 3/29/94 to 4/2/94 Authority to Advertise 10 days 3/24/94 to 4/7/94 Advertising for Bids 30 4/12/94 to 5/12/94 Pre -Bid Meeting/Job Tour 5/3/94 Bid opening 5/12/94 Bid Evaluation 6 5/13/94 to 5/20/94 Preparation for Council 10 .5/24/94 to 6/7/94 Authorization Notice of Award 6/8/94 Notice to Proceed 6/10/94 CONSTRUCTION PHASE Pre -Construction Meeting 6/14/94 Construction 4 Mos. 6/15/94 to 10/14/94 Punch List Items 15 Days 10/15/94 to 11/5/94 As -Built Completion 4 Wks. 11/5/94 to 12/6/94 Project Close-out 12/6/94 E/E'd OTZTV39902 S30IAa3S *aDW3 O�Ji3W EE:9T E6, E2 93d *"--& ME RO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Bldg. • an Second Ave., Seattle, Wa.-Aington 99104 C4-�a, i(AJA WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ❑ ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE gyG FILE/CONTRACT NO. Y 75 _ A6So z TO ATTENTION OF REGAR-D1f4y COPIES DATE DRWG.NO, DESCRIPTION �R .DE I I THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ FOR YOUR USE AND INFORMATION ❑ AS REQUESTED [246R REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ OTHER: "THE MUM WALM CT f!ETROPUITIN SRISTIE DOES 197 WARV-«T R COAUNTIE TIE fi bU'AC1 It NVICTRU! €F T1E CITA ' : =b' C'�M411 REMARKS w� �r� / h p u r D% /'e!//+�'�✓ !J `1 z' Sty _ =snd in�o��ar�7/aGI-- � oil SIG, RE j_ ITITLE_ — - DIVISION �� 1 0295 (Rev. 12/78) CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 1994 TO: Jack Crumley, Maintenance Lys Hornsby, Water Utility Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility FROM: John Hobson #0- SUBJECT: Metro Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Please review the attached 90% plans for the above referenced project with respect to your divisions concerns and return to me by March 22. MEMO.DOT/bh / liG I rta•'f c d C5-1 r'" cyYc�� GMrl� c f7 s j-1 JLi,H /C1 6L 11 / Cll tm"iz- / y CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 1994 TO: Jack Crumley, Maintenance Lys Hornsby, Water Utility Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility FROM: John Hobson - SUBJECT: Metro Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Please review the attached 90% plans for the above referenced project with respect to your divisions concerns and return to me by March 22. MEMO.DOT/bh e I CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 9, 1994 TO: Lys FROM: Carolyn SUBJECT: Metro Cedar River Trunkline Relocation My comment on the referenced project is as follows: We should alert Metro to our construction activity standards in the APA -[Section 8-8-6 E. of the Ordinance]. We should ask for detailed information regarding prevention of sewage spill during connection to the new trunkline. I'll want to make sure they are following our pipeline materials and testing specifications. Although ductile iron is specified, I don't know what type of gasket and lining they intend to use. I assume they are up to speed on our requirements already but I want to make sure. Do we want to require polyethylene -lined pipe because it contains leachate? AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA - ZONES 1 AND 2 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY STANDARDS These standards apply if the construction site is located in the Aquifer Protection Area (map attached) and more than de minimus quantities of regulated substances will be present. The de minimus quantity is 5 gallons of one substance or 20 gallons aggregate of all substances. The de minimus quantity for solids is 25 pounds of one substance or 100 pounds aggregate. Regulated substances contained in fuel and other tanks located on vehicles are exempt for counting purposes. A partial list of regulated substances is attached for your reference. Please contact the Water Utility at 277-4411 should you need further information regarding regulated substances or these standards. Storage of regulated substances on the construction site is not allowed. Exceptions can be made at Water Utility discretion for situations that would result in extreme impracticality or excessive expense. A generic list of regulated substances is attached. 2. The maximum period of time allowed for temporary storage of regulated substances, should it be permitted by the Water Utility, is 5 consecutive weekdays. This may be extended to weekends and up to 15 days if security or project personnel are on the site. The quantity of regulated substance is limited to the absolute minimum required for the job. Regulated substances to be stored will be specified as a condition of the permit. 3. Regulated substances must be stored within leak -proof secondary containment (liners, vaults, paved areas with curbing, etc.). The location of the storage area must be shown on a site plan. A copy of the site plan must be provided to the Water Utility. 4. Construction staging and refueling areas must be outside of the APA. Exceptions can be made at Water Utility discretion for situations that would result in extreme impracticality or excessive expense. The staging area and refueling areas must be limited to as small an area as possible if located within the APA. The location must be shown on a site plan provided to the Water Utility. Refueling areas must be covered with a leak -proof membrane surrounded by temporary retaining walls. 5. Equipment directly associated with construction activity must be bibbed to contain leakage of petroleum products. Bibs shall be drained and cleaned a minimum of once each day. Any equipment known to be leaking petroleum products or other regulated substances will not be allowed on the site. Exceptions to this requirement may be made at Water Utility discretion if it is not feasible to operate equipment with the bib in place. 6. The contractor must comply with applicable laws regarding disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. The contractor must also be contractually responsible for ensuring that subcontractors comply with disposal requirements. cast 94.doc Virgo METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle • Environmental Planning and Real Estate Division 821 Second Ave., M.S. 120 • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684-1165 • Fax (206) 684-1900 March 10, 1994 Mr. John D. Hobson Engineering Specialist II Utility Systems Division City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Cedar River Trunk, Phase II Dear Mr. Hobson: RD 991217, 11 MAR 151994 CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept. Per our telephone conversation of today regarding the review of the plans for the above referenced project and the permit processing fees, I am faxing to you the construction cost estimates as developed by the project manager, Mann -Ling Thibert. In addition, I am attaching the fee calculation worksheet which indicates a fee of $31,809.03 for this project. As I indicated, we are not including costs for the City's portion of the project. It is my understanding that you will verify that this amount is correct and that you will let me know as soon as possible so that I may request a warrant from our finance department. If you need additional information, please call me at 684- 1336 or Mann -Ling Thibert at 684-6785. Sincerely, Susan M. Solberg, SR/WA Supervisor, Real Estate SMS:ce Attachments cc: Mann -Ling Thibert Tim Goon Marc Dallas G:CEDAR I Recycled paper �Is0AAL TKuNA� Co�ST,�vc-T�o/,J COST Tlc'IJ G2v,9 NTl i U,v/T P,e/er D/P 2goo /90% SAFF� / srST�M 94/ ooa CDr/B�DD/�� /452 G"r 3o/6Y To61,,vDATio,v STA6/1IZATioA1 RA-cK- F" I( TYPE ► 7 )__ 65 3 3 C 'f .0 2f Fly its FA,BR/� 4-6 6 7 s'( 4 r ' IOAN No6E M A/v�ac� D ap eoNN EcT/otil CT / T /Z t') c tl - 7 / f ov,v °,9 T/ ° "' - Z / , r To TA L 5,32oo0 1� 33,6o0 0 43,560 /nlI'L. t rz A ✓A Ti 4 2 31158 A 5som r D S o /, 137,193 ft 9-334 T Qi ooc, A575UM& 6 51ba�A W JZ4 00 86� 00o1"A 86 00 P Z Z/ D o o l Z Z/OD ►1 S U T o Th-L.-:C 4=o P 4 2,b D I P� gg z645 3lfYf10S 9 41114M 03IIA13H We 31 ro1K1$S -IIII V.1 m r.mJ.111IX) 31rinos s�bYA A3 S 1331 IS ow WE zo zb(zr emz PUVif, l-%7eNf,\yam 'h 1{`' �. 311V � s:t,v33A 3 S 13311S W1 31ro1 K)S 4 �ISV 11111'1)IIMOS Mg ISr. zv ! TZ7AJ P1.5 eC I p 7- /0 Al U/) IV T-1 7- Pv/ -r 7-0 rA MAle, rw-MZ5�uT 4- 9 7 5^1 4249 N PrH F tpw 4/Z lz-,j r T ft5-r Molyull-16d`7- Z c14 � z zo /,c,4 --d: 44 0 e o Al CA5* -rg 10,4 vc- M,6N 7- 367 S5 301.5 T -0// COO' kV= 301, (19c;rOA / ) FAVEMrN7- NTeN 64 5 TbNS 14 17-Z)AJ 132/)00 hvE. IV. Yd ¢A TIC 14S leg (IV 5-T) .4 3-ell,--800 300 22 N 14S,ZO if-Ve 3-- 3 o 6 Mo /u SA U T 5600 Z, r. -TrmP. Few -IC 57p, ipllj e-,7 914 0 0 00 z lhu E s 6 -ro TA P r- M I67U T E 5 7-0 k 14 T/OAJ 11581 330 'POWHAS 31101M 0311A3311OW, GFW, Zt 31:V ��Ikllw 411MIAIMI Z.4' �v PIS09 K-?t f, 3/."1- g S�ti� 774 W 4# 7285 j)ES►��Co�IS�R��T 7 rNI ��� (f' I/C RciGv7-K1 � � •!l o - SIB ro r1r t = .fit 87,f5 6 c Tl 0,J -7 ' fl 77 � 7 (�vc 1 /1/04 67 �Csl e;Al, Co,� s7—k ; -- --- 0T/o,J S ALL Co S -TS /g/ G / C -(P2300%A /6 ►oo Sv8 ro7-4C = 0 39,745 I ' r' r r E /v AJ J 7 /8°O a) /2 Goo Cfl,✓Sfi�e7l.,,j n Z-oCA70)"] orrrU7 8'� c v c Gotil S i2v c 7-B � M17Xo z T e .N ¢ 2.00 /E�6600 C ,f� /-' SUB jaTAL _ l Z �o C ry / C' i 2 if 05 �100 :P/ kEc 7- (f ON 5 TR u V DA-) Co 5 7- 0 7- 2, 05 08 L Z A -rl 0 A/ IP'L-lt-lo 9/ Z- 7,47-IOAJ (5%) - � 5�' / l v, I 4-14- 10AD4 orm Z, 11 9 3 1 " Im m 31 Imm Ill ar p 41 we; I : Mv 1 14 Vil I N r., W ("AV 411,1 1 t.-Y I JA r&u k r; f PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 50% INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEES PER ORDINANCE NO. 4345 PROJECT NAME: CEDAR RIVER TRUNK - PHASE TT 1. Estimate the total cost of offsite and onsite improvements for water lines, sewer lines, stormwater facilities, and roadway improvements for your project. Enter estimated costs in items (A) through (D) below. (A) Water — U — (B) Sewer $ 931,186 (C) Stormwater $ - 0 - (Includes On -Site Pavement) (D) Roadway $ 158,330 (Street, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) (E) Total Improvements $ l , 0 8 9 , 416 (A) + (B) + (C) + (D) = (E) 2. Calculate 50% inspection/approval fee for total improvements, as follows: (F) 2.5% of First $100,000 of (E) $ 2,500 (G) 2% of over $100,000 but less than $200,000 of (E) $ 2000 (H) 1.5 % of over $ 200,000 of (E) $ 27,309, 0 3 (I) Total 50% Inspection/Approval ` Fee: (F) + (G) + (H) = (1) $ 31,809.03 3. Breakdown of 50% Inspection/Approval Fees is performed as follows: G) 50% Water Fee: $ -0- 401/343.90.00.01 (A) MX(n=(J) (K) 50% Sewer Fee $ 27,037, 6 8 401 /343.90.00.02 (B) (E) x (1) (K) (L) 50% Stormwater Fee: $ - 0 - 401/343.90.00.00 (C) ; (E) X m = (L) (1) 50% Roadway Fee: $ 4,771.35 000/343.20.00.00 (D) : (E) X m = (M) 4. Check: Make sure (J) + (K) + (L) + (M) _ (I) 92-311.DOC/GZ/bh [f b" METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle • Environmental Planning and Real Estate Division 821 Second Ave., M.S. 120 • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684-1165 • Fax (206) 684-1900 March 15, 1994 City of Renton Public Works Department 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sir/Madam: D SIT MAR 151994 OF RENT�N Eineering Dept. Metro has issued a SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance on its Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project Phase II & III. Copies of the project's DNS and checklist are enclosed as required by WAC 197-1 1-340. Also attached is a copy of Metro's SEPA Register for your information. If you have any questions please contact me at 684-1 174. Sincerely, Tim Goon Environmental Planning & Real Estate Division enlcosures • Metro 1*,..e ster A listing of environmental documents issued by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle. VOL. 9 NO. 2 DATE: March 15, 1994 TYPE: DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE NAME OF PROJECT: Cedar River Trunk Line Relocation Project Phase II & III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Metro is proposing to complete the phased relocation of its existing Cedar River Sewer Trunk Line within the City of Renton, Washington. The proposal would result in the construction of approximately 5,000 linear feet of new 42 inch diameter, ductile iron, gravity sewer pipe. The relocation is being undertaken to provide additional protection to the City of Renton's sole source drinking water aquifer by moving the existing trunk line further away from city wellheads. Construction of Phase II and III is scheduled for mid 1994 and mid 1995 respectively. Methods of construction would include open cut and jacking of the trunk line where open cuts would be impractical. In conjunction with the construction of Phase II, City of Renton street improvements to North Third Avenue will occur. These improvements will not reduce the number of current travel lanes along North Third. Construction should last approximately six months for each phase. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed realignment is located entirely within the City of Renton. The proposed trunk alignment extends west along State Route 169, under Interstate 405, along Third Avenue North and connects to Metro's existing Eastside Interceptor near Third Avenue North and Burnett Avenue in Renton. Those portions of the project west and east of Interstate 405 are designated Phase II and III respectively. FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Goon, Environmental Planner at 684 - 1174 DATE ISSUED: March 15, 1994 END OF COMMENT PERIOD: March 30, 1994 � "mMETRO Environmental Planning Division The Metro SEPA Register is issued a minimum of four times a year Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave. or as needed when a new environmental document is prepared. Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Annual subscription fee is $12.00. For information about the Register call 684-4163. fi CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 1994 TO: Neil Watts FROM: John Hobson `' SUBJECT: METRO'S CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT - Permit Inspection/Approval Fees Attached please find a permit inspection/approval fee calculation sheet and construction cost estimate for the above -referenced project. I have highlighted the portions of the project that will require City inspection and approval at cost to Metro. As part of Metro's trunkline project, the City's inspector will inspect the traffic control and street restoration which will include the trench backfill and subgrade for the roadway. Construction of the storm sewers and City sanitary sewers is being done by Metro for Renton's Central Renton Sewer Replacement Project (WO# 45170). Metro is paying for the City's sanitary sewer; however, the costs of the storm sewer will be the responsibility of Renton. Inspection and approval of this portion of the project will be done by the City and paid for under Work Order No. 45170. If you have any questions, please contact me at X-6179. H:DOCS:94-260:JDH:ps Attachment YULSLAI- W 1J111\J l lJl\J 11\lJ\ 11\l1V r PERMIT INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 50% INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEES PER ORDINANCE NO. 4345 .� PROJECT NAME:,, I. Estimate the total cost of offsite and onsite improvements for water lines, sewer lines, stormwater facilities, and roadway improvements for your project. Enter estimated costs in items (A) through (D) below. (A) Water $ - - (B) Sewer $ /37 /13, 00 (C) Stormwater $ -0- (Includes On -Site Pavement) (D) Roadway $ //2 /Cow (Street, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) (E) Total Improvements $ Z4'� 35--. DO (A)+(B)+(C)+(D)=(E) 2. Calculate 50% inspection/approval fee for total improvements, as follows: (F) 2.5% of First $100,000 of (E) $ Z.S00. CC (G) 2% of over $100,000 but less than $200,000 of (E) $ Z e) 0 0. o 0 (H) 1.5% of over $200,000 of (E) $ 740 _, 0 (1) Total 50% Inspection/Approval Fee: (F) + (G) + (FI) = (1) $ S2-4 o. 3 O 3. Breakdown of 50% Inspection/Approval Fees is performed as follows: ,U) 50% Water Fee: $ - eo - 401/343-90.00.01 ((A) \ (E)) z (1) _ (K) 50% Sewer Fee $Z' 88Z . l (a 401/343.90.00.02 ((B) \ (E)) x m = (K) (L) 50% Stormwater Fee: $ - n - 401/343-90.00.03 C) \ (E)) X m = (1.) (M) 50% Roadway Fee: $ 2.358. /¢ 000/343.20.00.00 ((D) \ (E)) X m = (M) 4. Check: Make sure (J) + (K) + (L) + (M) = (1) 92-311.DOC/GZ/bh �E - GoN STR T/oCo S T rSTi A -/ATE . 17 D� s c,ei pro.1eiA N �i r�/ n ¢ZCD � Cal STs Gem 84/ sr 0 0 k j 4ca CD �ovnioArio.v STABi[/�ATionJ . %,? � G � . 0 BA�KF�[c r►!/� ��� 6533C�/ Zvi y P,tic�= -Y 3 c /G r 33 .# 2r%eY ,ri[ �EpuhTozINd-l. ; O01aF: -DgPp COitlN EG;TlQti1�C7 T2 z,do O I.a I 4 I 5v8 -ro TA=1.: ( VaR 4 2"4 D I P _ I :. 1NdifB 0 3:►N CaLA`'3UGR i�'� //pp�� ,. I' l/r10l9 3.W1 C7n�f�M 7KY` 3hfIp6C�fv3-3�Ig3}6Xa 'ACD lAll[65�1V3]�7 `.a 3i615' IRED TRr""NcK �- IOv4ln/�s�0,J . 7 4 ! TD rA L -3 Z, QC '� /nl�C• Fier �i� �� . i,�ri,4.rwa , t «non nti) -0 33/600 z3.458 1113 )jfJ it `j,334 # 40,coo i4i5&mi 707, 43 /# U Z /4 TFis'1 Di.SGit' V p T /oAi I NN T� r� v.vl 7 Oel ro�; TO T R P.A"OLIv FArEMcti7- enzvodl-� z489 SY � l�lsy lol9$u 1tl arPi9ddrib�T= B/ -P/s/Oo f A 4- o�Eh .044 o i ✓ 4e011/ CRET� ffAilFNrFNT o ✓ PAY EMCW PA7'G)N . % p4 TDNS L g �jbti1 ' 7 oo' A rB rd 4 3 AS P,q (�! 3 Sr� Z 80o -309 o i ; ✓ rR A�FIc CoNrl�o L d do ✓ � /.�sz(2 ��io W SA k) Cv T As P,4Ac 7- 5500 �. F. T o /' • r P r N o , F 5�¢ Z ov , JsoM � z 6 s :E u S uQ To TA C_ (CAR PAY �M ,% let S To �f� T/OAJ W E A , co o - -- - _ a a E F �snnw� 3MIp(9 31FM1 QI T.II'Ntl tlC 0BP7 WVT 9 lUN1 Ojly.'�1y �11 dfi o 3MCEi 3Y�7li SlF?6 QN w.1 y�71�J�1Vp1�/ 3 �. `; .`„ V 3iYigl7 C[ldfi 0V1 m+ 3MAm OE6.�w7 U99,I�b6 l!>C.'f . .�,�j:�;• .4 Fr-r ,E�--(P V ) a 0 s io or Cati.i c cT l 0"1 -7 i A 4",€/1,J v u- j i LoC/1710 s Z 3 Gi !/ Ca �. CA 7 8 C Pvc ✓- C�Ti 8� 114./' 1 y 7zB5 �C< 6 rrs R / &I r rK r ��. Sc'B ro rAC 8 7 f 5 /�a/G� 770 r 1 �' `� �� � , r � rl,o� 5" 7�$JC-/N� G'Oi✓S7.CG'c ; i A[l costs a/ 14E7k o 2 3001,. A rVe -To ;rR C .- It 3 9, 7 45 418°O a 1? Gop 30/6,-r / ! � 200 D G o of S iR u c j L9 M i;rK0 � � Z /E� �6�C ToT,4t- 7a* �h 2 ? 50/A Zr00 Ppr 4t- 6 i�23 o C.�s� 6� blor 8r iiCG�'✓N f 4%e 3WY iM I 3.1.0c MAP.-10-'94 THU 18:25 ID!MEC - 12TH FLP. TEL t10:(206) 62/1-1900 tt222 P31 „/1IIM ETRO Muni(' pality of Metropolitan Seattle • hnvironmental Flannmg and Keal estate Untiion 821 Sec Ind Ave., M.S. 120 • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684-1165 • Fax (206) 634-1900 Post-w* brand tax TransmMal memo 7671 s et pages M� rc:h 10, 1994 TV v� u e of De t. I. S Phone # (O Ra■ # Fe.11 - 5 y nc� M irJohn D. Hobson • E4gineering specialist II U"ility Systems Division city of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South R(nton, Washington 99055 Cedar River Trunk, Phase II Dear ML . Hui)sua; PEr nu r tplpphnnp nnnvprsat5nn of tnday regarding the review u1 Lli(-- plaii5 rug Lhti ak)uve ieLetenced ptujec:t and the permit pilocessing fees, I am faring to you the construction cost estimates as developed by the project manager, Mann -Ling Tl�ibert. In addition, I an attaching the fee calculation wcrkshoet which indicatoo a foo of $31,809.03 for this project. As I indicated, we are not Including costs for -the City'9 portion of the project. It is my understanding that you will verify that this amount it correct and that you Will lot no know an noon an ponniblc srG thAt. T may rprliipst A warrant frnm nur finAnca department. It you need additional information, picric call no at 684- 111.36,or Mann -Ling Thibert at 094-6785. 6noorcly, i Si'Isan M. Solberg, SR/WA Skl.pe>_-visor, Real Estate S :S:ce A1;tachmontq c;t Mann -Ling Thibcrt Tim Goon Marc; Dallas 0 a N 0 nj :�G I/��r�, r.Ir.c�1. / ram-•-•-. .�.......-i� • - r �,� ,��E - CoN STR✓�T/o� CD S T �STi N�ATE . 42��rp SAFE; $Y:MeM (;rr 28oa i 4 5Z 61 Zvi y P0<cr- -4D, ` 13- r (Mpu .Y 3 c /e- r r FovNUArio.�/ STABi�/s�ATio.•l BA^KF/I 533C�% ri! iER I Li L TIE 1�ti T-Oe 117. lOhA) Not F 6' .. ,. l 9 -16 DE�jo S� o0116/4 CA, ,k,)A Al � d' a4 DEf� 1 : 1 �6; ooDIM v ieap Co,v,u elmoN" ( z z, D o 0 E Sv8 -ro TA k.FoR 4 2 4 P C; '�' lIMIg99 3,W1 CiNwitlB11 96`LY 71M" S3&G Yl lwzp 3A11[6 Sri1V37�1 S3�1S1S IBCA i -# 21 %c: Y qv�. P� �t`c.►v�,M�SE � y ' 4 To TA L ff 5'.3 Z / i tcAl/A��o�J -0 3 3,60o � 43S6o 2.3 1 j S A5S4M F D il 137,if3 it g334 4C"Coo tt57S UMj 70 % or `�f� It, J N_ n i �. f T4M WeglpTinAj IrAYIMg,-" ercf.*o'AL j -P/s'/0o f A 4.- �'Fs�-� /'�onlvti�E,�1T ON CRCrE 1?14MAW FAY EMAN % Pf17e, ki TT 44 7Ic co14reoL z487SY 367;5r i 66o/{ys cv T I T 5600 4 , z . . v v/ T oel rg 7-0 7-4 k— �� �s y 424$ y o y��vnl dr P,Av� r���T 4 44 D n. .}� 30/ 5:'r �/l,000' 1�►'= lr �- = 3oa�lFi+iyoR�� 0 94 /)ZAJ gz t7o0 4'Are, 3'i�SP//(n!3s -.goo t� 22� 1!✓ A /�SZo 3i8 �rz1,z6a i rMP. _TQAF�ic P/Ne7 g�c� o=' vo .!1lo�f z iA4jF / $ vQ -ro TA l_ 1 � ,h�} �.`�' 3MUf S 31F111 071:11'NY tlC �d1 31VfiCE 9 'iLK1 OIKN.71tl ni d'S-� �M�s.i�{ 71�s1►asaw as.s 31VIAEG �� iil3 [�I�Ii mi +Ire► �� _� 3Mt7ES.iN'77d79111•i6 wcvr -.!^ - , . • 1/ /+ r 3/4- Iti Irki -TCPvrl-� o h��c��sRy r?ErK n- ni Sc•B rorAc 87�5 v €/i�- t 7,, al S ,67<V r,L ' ,/; v cco ) , 2- 3 jo y- -7 , r . rl,o 57 -P�516jAr, ���,�s�,e�•� ; L Lij G C B Tr �? 2 3OD�t A I b 100 Sv8 To 7A t- 1t 3 9, 7 45 12 Gvo — .S7o;N LCf) 7 l23 /t,r 9�C?Do r° A pti c co D 0/cq�- �3' (' SG� %,p ir4 so oQZ a E 4t'61,230 a J• LL 2' f�l U LLI E A { M m 1 2 _I I cc E 40 A.l 05 Lrloe-) A &It"AC191Z,1ZA7-10A) (5,�) J �,,� +wrxef 311w1 QJIY�ltl1101 � o ,�S.P,, Z �M'M6f 711M Q7 AI]Itl10 iNA - �11/f11Cf.f8V_3gA�)[i%A 11191�l;nav al m - - ll�If.I�LY_jlJ�IIKIR Ilq d► MAP.-10-' 94 THU 18:2e ID: MEC - 12TH FLP. TEL N0: (206) Ge,1-1900 tt202 P06 PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT INSPECTION/APPROVAL FF.F. C:AT.0 ITT.ATTC)N WORKSHF.FT 50% INSPECTION/APPROVAL FEES PER ORDINANCE NO.4345 PROJECT NAVE: LEDAR RIVER TRUNK - PHA,SF TT 1. Estimate the total cost of offsite and onsitc improvements for water lines, sewer lines, stormwatcr facilities, and roadway improvements for your project. Enter estimated costs in items (A) through (D) below. (AjI Water $ -0- (BJ� Sewer S 9 31, 18 6 (C) Swrmwatcr $ - 0 - (TLILCIucICJ 011-SitC FaVCu1C11t) (D)" Roadway $ 152,330 (Strtet, sidewalks, street lighting, etc.) z,' Total huprovcnicats $ l , 0 8 9 , 9 I6 (A) + (B) , (C) ., ()) T (� 2. Calrnlatl- 50% incPectinn/npprnvA fee. for tntal imprnvements, ac follows: m' 2.5% of Pir3t $100,000 of (L) $ 2 , 500 , (Gj i' 2% of over $100,000 but less than $1Uu.mu of (E) S 2000 �3 34Z.Z4- (11131 1.5% of over $200,000 of (E) $ 27, 3 0 9.0 3 (1) Total 50% Inspection/Approval , 8 4 2 4- Fee: 03 + (G) + (H) _ (1) $ 11 , 8 0 g _ 0 3 3. Brcakdo vn of 50% bispection/Approval Fccs ib perfvrmcd as follows: 5096 Water Fee: $ -0- 401/343-90.00.01 (A) = (E) x (1) a u) 10 50% Scwcr Pcc $ 2 7. 0 3 7.6 8 401/343.90.00.02 (B) * (ED x (1)- (K) (L) li -io% Stormwater Fee. S -0- 401/343.90.00.00 (C) . (>') x (1)= (L) (M 50% Roadway Fee: S 4, 7 71. 3 5 000/343.20.00.00 (D) : (E) x (J) = 4. Check. ;'vlakc sure (J) + (ID * (L) * (I►f) _ (I) 9I•)1 � .Duciuz�ei . .' Earl Clymer, Mayor November 16, 1992 Mr. John Spencer, Director Water Pollution Control Department METRO 821 Second Ave - M/S 82 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT Dear Spencer: Per our telephone conversation of November 10, 1992, 1 have asked my staff to review your request to postpone the construction of the Cedar River Trunkline Relocation until 1994. The conclusion we have made is that your request is acceptable under the following terms and conditions: 1) That pre -design, environmental review, and final design continue on the schedule established for the 1993 construction window. 2) That construction begin no later than the second quarter of 1994 to ensure that the City will not threaten its eligibility for Public Works Trust Fund loans currently being secured for our local sewer replacement project. 3) That coordination efforts with the City's proposed transportation improvements continue to ensure that the timetable for the transportation projects do not slip. 4) That it is understood that construction of the trunkline relocation can be divided into phases. Phase 1 shall be from the connection at the Eastside Interceptor to the easterly right-of-way of Factory Avenue North. Subsequent phases will be established as necessary to meet the scheduling of both the City's Park Department through the Cedar River Park as well as the Washington State Department of Transportation in regards to the 1-405 project. ifcncur .�t}+ Itn. 1 L . f . l ' _ L 11 you C.,:.�,,. ... ms 1 through 4 Slli�'v'vli hereon" N�2aSc S��il 'die Jrigi(1ai dllu CCpy lit t11C )VC1%,C provided and return this original to the City for its records. This document shall serve as a "Letter Agreement" defining the requested revision to schedule by Metro. This letter meets the intent outlined in Sections 7.2.2 and 8.3 of the Memorandum of Agreement entered into by Metro and the City of Renton. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Dave Christensen at (206) 277-6212. Sincerely, �dLynn uttmann, Administrator -1 /�'� o Spence Date Di ctor, Water Pollution Control Department C:DOCS:92-927:LAG:DMC:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman Dave Christensen Rod Schindler 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Ir Memo February 14, 1994 TO: Bob Bergstrom, HCW-L FROM: Dan Brown Fidl 7 15911 4 CITY OF RENTON 90825 Engineering Depc. Y75 SUBJECT: Cedar River Trunk Relocation, SD Installation ARMS No. A65021; Task No. Y75 Enclosed for your review and comments are three plan -and -profile sheets and one sketch and schedule for installation of the storm drain you designed. They will be incorporated into Metro's construction contract. Please consider the following items and forward your comments to us. 1. Existing underground utility interferences. 2. Invert elevation of 8" PVC pipe at catch basins and at manholes. 3. Stationing for connection to existing storm drain. 4. Offset for new catch basins. 5. Invert elevation of existing 15" SD at connection point. 6. Verify MH and CB type. 7. Verify size of new PVC storm drain. Thank you for your timely response. -DB:sc/msk�� cc: John Hobson - City of Renton Mann -Ling Thibert - 117 ;�METR0 EXIS I ING 1 5' SD SEE SCII—B FOR INVERT NEW REN I ON MI I BY METRO NEW 42" ME SEWER, SEE SCHEDULE A OF N 3RD ST LOOKING EAST i 1 E 8" (A) SET DIS LANCE RIGI-11- SCHEDULE—B IE n" (D NEW RENTON CB BY METRO KEG! 8" p'/c 5 b FlY M Ere o STA IE 15"SD ® 8' CONN IE 8" (A) ** CB OFF— SET DIST RIGH1- IE 8" 0 (B) MH TYPE * CB TYPE * REMARKS 1. 5125 21.94 21.94 50, 25.27f 2, PG B027 1, PG 801.2 WILLIAMS/WELLS ALLEY 2. S I-05 23.45 23.45 40, 26.1 1i 2„ PG B027 NA, PLUG END WELLS/PELLY ALLEY 3. 13-1-68 25.77 25.77 43, 28.53 2, PG B027 1, PG B012 PARK/GARDEN ALLEY +: RI_FEIZ 10 CHY OF RF.N1OI,I, `,IAIdT)AI?D PLANS FOR [ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPLE CONSTRUCTION. SMALL I lFLD VI_ IZIF'f -11 IE LOCAL IONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS PRIOR 10 1111= MANHOLE AND 8" SIORM DRAIN CONNECTIONS. TYril-AL 0" STORM DFI%AIN CONHECTION �c SCIIEDULC _�_. O 40 Q v V 80600 1 DUCT 1 BURIED 1 BURIED 815 1 11 J�) T [I] cn V) Iw N STA 6+55.08 1 [ 1,O05P95.72 E '1'661287. 8 I Ld S I- I 11.2 ' BEND STA 6+40, 5' L [10, lj 1 BURIED C C,t2 V sD3R6ST 5 Ss�eh j h'E�� N \ 3, \� \ C — - C112 E2 _-- 1 DUCT ^� 1 BURIED -� 817 MH R10-2A 251 ELEVATION 0 OR 100 DESICNI EQUALS MEAN SEA LEVEL, 1926 USC&GS (ADJUSTED 1947) y� LpAT�I - DRnwn1: DJB RECOMM N 180588.23 120H I I 1201 F�1 d O S. E MH P - - -- N 3RD STREETLi �iD G -,o TV 1: c� I I PLAN G 1 r� 05— ----CABLE 1V T — _ _ I i■m 14 FH N 88742'43" W 120-1 E 1661856.55 REMOVE & REPLACE MONUMENT i -- 34 0 a _1 - _ 13+00 T S. t�FH Ir-jF_ 250 L ELEVATION 0 OR 100E-I DLSIGNFI): EQUALS MEAN SEA I 192�5 USC&GS (ADJUSTED 194�) �ti—LT, DJB CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 1994 TO: Jack Crumley, Maintenance Lys Hornsby, Water Utility Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility FROM: John Hobson L/9sC�- SUBJECT: Metro Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Please review the attached 90% plans for the above referenced project with respect to your divisions concerns and return to me by March 22. MEMO.DOT/bh MAR 03 '94 19:26 METRO ENGR. SERVICES 2066941710 P.1/2 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Avc. • Seattic, WA 96104-159a FACSIMII.$ TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE SENT: ' T TRANSMITTED TO: T— TRANSMITTED FROM: �H �%4 rig/Al (Name) (*fail Stop) (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION MIBER: (206) 684-1710 NO. OF PAGES TRANSMIWEU: (Including Cover Sheet). FOR INTERNAL STAFF USE ONLY: p PROJECT : C&2r ' ✓ram Too, 1� e`D C . A1:MS/TASK NO.. Sui3.TECT : NOTES: y�v 2bo 7ZX4C E1(ISrINC 8' SS SHALL LalE ABANDON AND 1'LUC I DURING KEPTIN EXIST4�G OF •V 3F0 ST RENTON 11P EY.ISTMG 8"SS LOO:OHC :1ST lE]JPORA O 6' FTU EIAQW. CONNECTEXISM0 8"S57 EXISTING 8`SS / `EXISTING 8'SS FLOW 1 1 PLUG CtLCTlI1G UMIi$ OF 8.,�- EXG4✓ATICA' 1 F A' (A) P`'C STUB W/ CAP N-W 47' NLTRO ...V1 FOR FUTURE CONN SEWER, SEE - Cel9 KEY/ R-aam NH SCHEDULE A I BY METRO FM INVER---- NEW 8"SS O.P, BY METRO. OFFSET DISTANCE R GHI DO NOT PUT IN S= R✓ICE LIML INSIRLICIIaT BY THE EINGINEEA SCHEDULE -A I 4 SS �.A E B" EIST IE e" E �' I O BI' 0ON4 A (A) '* SET DMA RIGHT O (a) 04 MH TYPE O (C) j REMARKS 1, I va 16.25 21.03 30, 22.90 25.00 S. PG 13072 BURNOT/WILLIM6 ALLEY 2. 5+22 1937 22.15 4Y 24.90 25.00 8, PG 8072 WILUAAIS,0'HLLLS ALLEY 3. 84.01 20.20 22.98 26, 25.05 25.15 48", PG 8071 WELLS/P LY ALLEY 4. IOIf 1 21 .Dr, 23.83 3" 26.82 26.92 1 S. PG 8072 PELLY/PARK A_LE`•' 5. 13+E4 21.139 24.67 33, 27.86 27 E-G I 6, PG 8072 PARK/M40EK ALLEY 6. 18+'u 2:5.23 20.01 30' 28.63 28.73 E. PG 8072 GARDEW^/ EACQW ALLEY 7. 20+89 24.07 26.85 I 40' M97 29.07 E. PC 8072 MEADOA/FF,CTORY ALLEY • REFER 10 CITY OF REN1011, STAWMRO PUNS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND IAUNICIPLE CONSTRUNIIQN. �« OONTP.ACIOR SH4`J_ FIELD VERIFY THE L.00APONS ,AND INVERT E.EVATI-aNS PRIOR TO THE MANHOLE AND Er SEWER Z:0NHECTIJN5. TYPICAL 8" SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION & SCHEDULE�B� NONE 01 11 ME Sl LOOKING EAST EKISITMG I T CS 12- &� Mr=TR0 (P X4 King County / Department of Metropolitan Services a, ? Exchange Building • 821 Second Avenue • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684 - 2100 February 22, 1994 90828 E13 John Hobson Utility Systems Division Planning /Building/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project, Phase III Construction Easement ARMS No. A65022; Task No. E13 Dear John: Metro is currently in the process of relocating its 42-inch diameter Cedar River Trunk sewage line in order to meet our commitment to the City of Renton as specified in our Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). The City of Renton chose a new pipe alignment along the North Third Street to coincide with the City's North Third Street Improvement project and to comply with its own "Livable Streets" program. The current alignment and construction plans require that Metro obtain a permanent utility and temporary construction easement on the property lot owned by Mr. C.W. Pharr and Mrs. JoAnn Pharr and located at 255 Sunset Blvd. North. Metro's right-of-way group is currently working on this acquisition. If we are unable to secure the proper easements, Metro has received written assurance from the City's wastewater utility group that rerouting the pipeline along Sunset is an acceptable alternative. If you have any questions, please contact me at 684-6785 or David Christensen at 277- 6212. Sincerely, I Mann -Ling Thi Project Manager MLT:sc/mS C� cc: Roger Browne - 117 Marc Dallas - 122 PLANNING/ BUILDING/ PUBLIC FORKS DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 UTILITY SYSTEMS DIVISION - 235-2631 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION - 235-2620 TO: MET D DATE: B. J ICI �4- JOB NO. SZ l SEr�oNr� A\/E M 5 / l RE: GEDAK fz� vC—>z T u K �.vE ATTN: GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ATTACHED ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS PRINTS o COPY OF LETTER ❑ ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA ❑ REPRODUCIBLE PLANS ❑ SPECIFICATIONS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: COPIES DATE NUMBER DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ FOR APPROVAL o APPROVED AS SUBMITTED FOR YOUR USE ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED ❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS o FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ COPIES T0: SIGNED TITLE cdc=�� /�fr /✓q�E� o RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE ""METRO Letter of Transmittal dr 821 Second Ave., M.S. 117, Seattle, WA 98104-1598 (206) 684-1298 To %Z r(" el---w %DAl We are sending you the following:IgAttached ❑ under separate cover Date 2 /� File/Contract No. 75 To Attention Of Regarding ' / / ef� / ofile V �e U /v �C__ Copies Date Drwg. No. Description These are transmitted: ❑ For approval ® For your use and information ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ Other Remarks�- nature 0991 (12/g -- "METR® d, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SKEET t1 q Q DATE S ENT : /� 1 TRANSMITTED TO: c10 /) r t 0 B. 1 0/y L/y O F ,P,6:Av j 0 /2_ TRANSMITTED FROM: gAA Ay — Z (N 6-7 / / 7 (Name) (Mail Stop) (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: (206) 684-1710 NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: (Including Cover Sheet) FOR INTERNAL STAFF VSE ONLY: PROJECT: ARMS/TASK NO.: SUBJECT: NOTES: �� 6 / J 14 3°'t' ---I.oN SW jl m N OD tD tD a) D'J to W U H tY Ld to �i t9 z W (D Ch H W E Q) V r-i V Ql m .1 GQ W L� I. S, Q- w t 1 a ae_ repft:senting M e l ro agree to comply with all traffic regulations of the City of Renton. I shall prepare a traffic control plan and obtain City approval of that plan. That plant shall be implemented for all strcct and lane closures, and the plant shall be performed in compliance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. I understand any lane or street closures without an approved traffic control plan and notification of emergency services may result In my receiving a citation for violation of R.C.W. 46.61.190(3) Obstructing Traffic and/or for violation of 9A.36.050 Reckless Endangerment. I certity I am responsible for the project and the responsible party to be cited for violation of R.C.W. 46.61.190(3) Obstructing Traffic or 9A.36.OSO Reckless Endangerment. NA;vIE: � �bef4 15"s D.O.B.: HOME 2evltoti JAI& . ��0579 _ WORK ADDRESS: q2 I S c . _ Q "5m#lp 9$16 WORK PHONE: 6,64 - /OZ 5 HOME PHONE: _2Z`e'P-5Q O COS -OR EYES: 4-z WEIGHT: ,I HEIGI{T:__5-t ?I' COLOR HAIR: ^^8RN WASHINGTON STATE DRIVERS LICENSE NUMBER: I S kL A f2Ya +F2 l) H.kTan. po,utioMOP* 060-%rmc t f CITY OF RENTON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY: —/V��_ �j _ APPL. DATE: Z�/d ADDRESS: PHONE #: tJ CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT: 0 C"�S�A�C� CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: APPROVED BY: (� � } I ��� JIZ _ WORK TIME: o r� APPROVAL DATE: (Q�G ck WORK DATE: Zl/p�Gjl� NOTE: CALL 911, FIRE & POLICE BEFORE ANY CLOSURE COMMENTS: SKETCH N0 � c � �"l1Ti�L 7 J L-AwE Lc�D J k � — — N-.el� sT M O IN 0 �T��c. siyN�tL a k Z moo' Z5o' CCNT� IZvhD LA,�e G�I�!ST)zJcn�q,j C�'osCa ,O MAL Earl Clymer, Mayor February 8, 1994 Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E. Engineering Services Division Metro 821 Second Avenue, M.S. 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT FOR CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION Dear Mann -Ling: Enclosed please find a copy of the utility plans for the proposed dive shop which will occupy the property where the Cedar River Trunkline is planned to be constructed. It appears that this project could be constructed early this summer. If the sewer line is installed after the dive shop is built, it may be necessary to make the proposed jacking pit at MH R10-9A into a receiving pit only. The pipe would then have to be jacked from the east side of Sunset Blvd. to the west into the dive shop property and from the Houser Way pit to the east into the property. This would allow the pit on the subject property to be reduced in size to minimize restoration. Also, could you please transmit a letter to me explaining that Metro is in the process of attaining an easement across the property in question. This documentation will be placed in the City's plan review file to help inform the plan review staff of the necessity of this easement. Sincerely, ?hn. Hobson, Project Manager Wastewater Utility H:/docs/94-123/JDH/bh 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS PAPER CONTAINS 50% RECYCLED MATERIAL., 10% POST CONSUMER m v OD �D m ry co w U H (C w co [e Z w a w m m V O1 (ll C0 W w L� Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE SENT:�Z TRANSMITTED TO: TRANSMITTED FROM,A�ti (Name) (Mail Stop) (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: (206) 684-1710 NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: 5 (Including Cover Sheet) FOR IIITERNAL STAFF USE ONLY: — PROJECT: ARMS/TASK NO.: SUBJECT: NOTES:" 09�29 93 00:14 FAX 206 235 2541 RRNToN P.+H•`PW 1 � '@Id no N' rogct. They are prCAJCCaarq:4 "��•. •' 0rtiy E.'Nl (1Ai tt�ly' r5 C`. pt@S59d Ce -.YO— j�. � •—a—.�., r In --4 qN 2ROOKS4 Sr LI O s a V zo 6 �1 • / g \ • i7r 10. �i IWO1,11,31 (tl m .m w LL. lauu2 N01-:: Ktdll M3pS are CJI;l,1,6 01 ardFie;dSuavyys. Theyarea,06.6 Wh ' a,.d 0a waraMy a erpreSSey 24 • �. KING PIT MH R10—BA / / / / 233 STA 29+00.64 r / / / / �Ocf.4-L �IcE PAVED PARKING O N 180305.58 E 1663215.70 / / / N 180300 �./ �• / / a s M t0 JT m / /RECEMNG PR ` °�2a 1 MH R10-9A '0� / /o ,� % ���� \\ �� STA 30+65.40 r, Q 0� B-8 / / 1 / (( ` ` \` N E 1663 65.26 v cs / '� -H M ITORI (I w FH Z / // / \ \ ( PERMANENTS w / // // /� / EASEMENT �w / � MJ JACKING PIT - \ \\ \\\ \\ / g / DENSE BRUSH /� N'�I6 200 / h PLAN 20 0 20 / / so CONSTRUCTfOfd N D CD EASEMENT m' ' FEET I Y, Z iZ i i i i;r--,�°-_�__-__ I l I I MARION ST� o p; _N r , L—ILAPHASE 2 - [:C1:04F7'. :�71 ,�z -- ` F�, BROOKS1S , I, r /r , r /, , 1h �Qi LIBERTY PARR'Pw-9 • / r Pw-1• \ Pw-2 • ,s. r r / � r i r r r / r / , r / � r , 0 cp, CEDAR RIVER Pw-s• PARK r S O CEDAR RIVER TRUNK - - - _ - - - - -� OT2.Ttr902 S= CEDAR RIVER 'HOW3 Ob13W 92:OT tr6, 20 93d /% len Fn CONSTRUCTION / -tly V\(/ FEET / / �l\ =20�) / :ln.. .. ......... :0::.... : :::::::� .....:: : ......: ::::::: ...... ...... :... :�:::: I. ....... ::::::: :::::::.:::..::: :: ::::::: ... ......'old 0+ . :. ::..::::: :::::: i ::::::: ::::::: ::::::: ': ;::: :::::::::::: ::..::: 60 ;:::::: ::::::: ... ::::::: {ii.::::: '::..... :::: :: .. ....... ....... ...:. I:i6::::.:... ....... ::::::: :: :::::: :::: I:::::::: ::::::: :: :� ::::::: ..... ::: ::: ....... ::: .:::::: ::::::: ......: :::::.. ......: ::::::: ::::::: ::.. .. :::: ::::::: ::::..: ::::::':: 50 ... ....:.: �:::..... z ..... ....... ....... ....... I...... ....... ....... :. .:...::�::: :: ::::::: :::::.. :j. :::: SUNSET BCItl...:....:::::: ':: :: :::: ' I.......: : " ::: ::..:::: :::::::: : :...... ::::::: ... " :: :::::: ;:::::: :::: ......: ::: ::: :: :::: :::::: ::::.,.::::: .. ........... ::::::: 40 : ......: ::::::. ...... ::::::: ....... ::::::: ::::::: ::: :... ...... .....:: ::::::: ::::::: ..... ..:::::.�.::::::: .:.. ....... ....... ::::::: :::.... ....... 30 ....... ... .... ...... t: :IE:27. Ir.27: 7- .:::::: ........ 2 2 0 co ......: ::::: ::::::: :: ::::::: ::::::.::::::.,... H: ::::::: KED: ::::::: :: ::" ::::': ... ::::::: ...... ::::::: :' ::::::: :::::: ::::::. � . ...... :::: :: ' :::: :::.:. :PIPE: : W ::::::: :'$ ::::: ::::::: ::: nn q : ::: ::: ::::::: :..::: ::::::: ::::::.'::::::::: ..::::: :::::: ::::::: ::: ::::::. rn. .... :::::: ::::: + . :::::: :.::... .:..... :::::. :::::.. :................ ,�.:................ ....... ....... ....... 10 : ..:z ::::::::: ::::::::::::: ::::: :.:. w' ::: :::::::::: 0 . :.::.:.:.: ::::::: . ::.:: ::::::: 0 L : ::::::: :.::::: :...... ...... ......... ........ ... ....... ....... ....... j :::::::: ::::::: 320,00: LF: DIP,CL 5 ,Sr0:A05 :ft ft::. .. : ' ' :::: ::::::: ........ mPROFILE :: :::: ::::: ::::: :::: ::::::: ::::::: :...... .......::::::: ..... :....... ... ....... ...... ....... 29+00 30+00 31 +00 'R1 CD ELEVATION 0 El DR f OD EQUALS = F&A 9s4 UStacslAPIUSIFID I DESIUNM.- M—LT/DJB 1i11nlelpelity of MetroWlitan Seattle 4�MRTRO DRAWN: DJB CHECKED: M —LT SCALE: CEDAR RNIER TRUNK RELOCATION PHASE 2 FlLE NO: Y75 NOTED n l A* 1 A h 1 P1 0 D /i CI I C DRAWING NO: RECOMMENDED: 4-'0 MANHOLE & 8" SS LATERAL PIPE CONNECTION SCHEDULE NOTE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. STAI CL IE 8" (B)- I IE 8"(A) IE 8" (A) OFFSET DIST (L) j_ IE 42" OFFSET DISTANCE (R STATION IE OF ® 42" IE " OF B APPROX MANHOLE OFFSET RIGFfT(R) IE OF 8" 8" CONN ® (A)**OR LEFT L ® (B) } 1 -1-50 18.25 - _ � (R) on -- Z 54-22 19.37 - - 4/ Z (R) - Z5 8-1-01 20.20 - - zv)l (R) 10+81 21.05 - - 3 (R) 2 - Zh 9 13-1-64 21.89 - - �31 (R) - Z7 q--�- 18+09 23.23 - (R) _ 7-973 20+89 24 07 oa R/,W NI 101E REMARKS -= 13v 2 N6,77- - w L L I A M 3 A 0ey C.rx /E zs,S3 A lk y — ���s -- PSI (� ,��►�y PAY - (r'A2 pGti - (JA2kAGGC--� - G�f�� --/tilE.4pOw a4t/ey 22+22.73 24.47 -- � - �� -© Awl CON�N TO METRO MII R10-5A, sots ) = CENTER OF MI1 1,P &°,tT 2S. 6: , B pule 4' MANIIOLE DETAIL SHALL BE PER CITY OF RENTON STANDARD PLANS, PAGE B071. (� fc v� CONTRACTOR TO THE MANI SHALL FIELD VERIFY TOLE AND 8" SEWER THE LOCATIONS AND INVER ELEVaTIOroS'PRIOR "' ' "'}r;F-^�-��,•�- CONNECTIONS. - ..-•.- , r' ' � - - �'/`-.l'a.I,^..T_7s�":,.:'?I�i 11 f,'�F� ��� �� ��j/�'- •.�i-.I.L Ci, � �'Y �-1•�, I I 'R Earl Clymer, Mayor January 10, 1994 Mann -Ling Thibert, Project Manager Metro - M/S 117 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION Dear Mann -Ling: Attached you will find the City's proposed schedule for PS&E on the North third Street roadway improvements as well as a preliminary engineer's cost estimate for this project. Please review this data and then we will set up a meeting in the near future to establish our methodology for coordinating this work. If you have any quest 277-621 Sir�del Wy, D*Tid V./Christ en Wastew ter tility Supervisor H:DOCS:94-038:DMC:ps CC: Rod Schindler John Hobson Attachments re additional information, please contact me at (206) 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS PAPER CO^TFAISS ", RECYCLED MATERIAL, 10% POST CONSUMER €i North 3rd Livable Street Schedule Haseaaps a Data Collection i a i i S 1 � y' i t � ♦ 3-v- y y 301 Roadway alignazent Data 30% Paving i Drainage Plans 301k Roadway Sections heat with metro i Bntranoo Field Review 30% Design Prepare 30% Cost Ratimate Package 30% Snhmittal Submit 30% Design City's 301 Rsvi&w Discuss Review Coasnents tic/ City Prepare a Conduct Open House ? 90% site Prep Plans 90% Roadway Sections 901 Details 90% Paving a Drainage Plans 901 signing a Pavement Narking 90% Landscaping t Irrigation 90% iiigmrsnt Deta Sheet 90% index of drawings i sap Field Review 90% Design Prepare special Provisions Prepare 901 Rstinate su2-4t 90% P"Z City Review Discuss Ccommuts w/ City Revise 100A PS&Z Sabah Final PS&H /U 3 2D lr ly A—Z uC S i 0-7 Tu 'F--D 4—,4 17 T EM Mobs/r-zu �z.�H. Tva ''.t � c C� ., fi• e 1 � � T .n � •n � lY..lrl / ItiC� � � ✓4 O L • M :�O �4W Gurtit �A✓e .... Y.� nC cCv IZ2..e,,e1 Lowe Make.: / i�F Dr4„tics 22 /�-61u1 � .v .^_,.,. •. ll ( r C4✓a � G4 �� A tOkitil I� l�w'f•,� � �. a , I v Sow r M / S ! c--r k e-- UNc LS L S L C LS L— LF =Y L F C -/ LA L:*1 L i- ,/ CA. To xi Tb N r r �A LS L 5 u P-.4 I PRit I4o�oa I z- O O o O Gar.,L72vc,T/O.J (f-c t i0-0t-Lnt4iZ3 At"M I i0N 2, O O O ol =ram oc 3t�o� 4 4, ono 4 i,13 of 8 o e 4 )7 o o 7t o o O 3 ! o0 vl O O p 2 4 o 0 o O c.)e 4S or ZJo q Ti r,co r 7r'e��oo -Q j ,Zoo L / 2-/3 0/ S3 N 3/Zb LyA-9L-� 572—e — QU2rvL" � 4,.N-P- SS-4 4r + 4-a t s.l -r 4-Icl) x '2- = U � � 70 ✓_ f I i N N N 1 r r H _ ; y !?� w, o y t. � 1�+ c w� � k � C, a :• a :,.� � r = Z �o o X Z X � � � _ � ti-v_ c,: '�;., ! �- `+- � c• � `j . V1NN coo of O O N LF cr c C 4(4Ni CXGsiv4 7.o�. = ZZ�o 7c ZX Z h —L J 2-2 1 c a a I I I % ! �vinS��� /<4C+L — ZZooX �y.LX iZX X r,$S — SOIL DLO ��14l� �143! L Z�-t7C7XZXZX/t—X ..-:k' �.oa 1 /4T a I f L/4 s -..:-O 'lei cj r / 1/3 -/ S- 3 ,U 3 2,1, L► v LL57 <� 3--(�-T — 13 U a- i 7 i s i�4-c_7-u (Q y 0 I �r� 441 ` 1 6 In V1 .n 1204-��,,�7sLy 000 I A 2 o N macro — — _ — _ w _ _ _ — _ rF —1— c+err e4 tr cr a eel �a i �OI iZl 3� jz-I 20 carp w P.r�-( ..orL,ua I . 4 IS i 6" Ai:jok Ct E j�2� Po 5 T� -F-/ 431 C. A-L SG L1-D I�1 1 I.S 41 S r / l-2-/3o/ 53 4% p s� ..�L ' Earl Clymer, Mayor December 29, 1993 Mann -Ling Thibert, Project Manager Metro - M/S 117 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CIT Planning/Bui: SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION ALTERNATIVE BACK-UP OPTION Dear Mann -Ling: In response to your letter of November 9, 1993, the City has reviewed your request to consider a back-up alternative for routing Phase III of the Cedar River Trunkline Relocation northerly along Sunset Blvd. to North 3rd/North 4th merge, and westerly along North 3rd Street to Factory Avenue North. The City accepts this alignment as an alternative with the following conditions: 1) That all options involving the potential traversing of private land be fully investigated for feasibility prior to proceeding with subject alternative alignment. 2) Metro assumes any additional costs associated with this alternative alignment for the installation of its interceptor. 3) Metro agrees to participate in roadway restoration requirements for that portion of North 3rd Street from Factory Avenue north, east to the railroad tracks in a similar manner as it participates in roadway restoration west of Factory Avenue North within North 3rd Street. 4) Metro understands that it will bear all costs of any relocation of City utilities/facilities needed to facilitate this alternative. 5) The City will give final approval as to actual location within the right of ways for Sunset Blvd. and North 3rd/North 4th Street. I hope this answers your questions regarding this subject and that given this decision by the City, no time delays will occur within either the Phase II or Phase III portion of the relocation project. If,X� �iav ny,Auestt7s or require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277-6212.7 I /l SinCerjefy rVid M. Cpfftens& astewgter Utility Supervisor H:DD :93-1230:DMC:ps 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS PAPER CONTAINS 50% RECYCLED MATERLaL, 10% POST CONSUMER m ETRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 (206) 684-2100 o� December 22, 1993 90775 Y75 Dave Christensen Utility Systems Division Planning/Building/Public Works Department Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project ARMS No. A65021; Task No. Y75 Dear Dave: Enclosed for your information is a copy of Metro's current SEPA status. After the New Year, I would like to discuss with you some of the outstanding issues indicated in this memo. Thank you for sending the engineering information on manholes and 8" pipe connections. We will incorporate aia data into our design work accordingly. I will send the drawings for your review and comment as soon as they are available. I wish you happy holidays and look forward to continue working with you in the new year. Very truly yours, Mann -Ling Thibe Project Manager MLT:sc/msk �(' Enclosure Memo December 16, 1993 TO: Mann -Ling Thibert FROM: Tim Goon SUBJECT: Cedar River Trunk Phase II & III SEPA Process The purpose of this memo is to reiterate the outstanding SEPA issues that will need to be resolved in order to move forward with final design for phases II of the Cedar River Trunk. 1. Associated Renton Construction Projects Similar to needing final design for the proposed Third Avenue street improvements in order to prepare the phase II construction contact, I will require a signed SEPA determination and documentation covering Renton's street improvement project. This is a prerequisite for Metro to release a SEPA determination on phase II & III. This condition is necessary because the construction contract scope includes Renton's street improvement work. I want to stress that Renton's environmental analyses should address the impacts and mitigation associated with North Third and Fourth Streets in order to be adequate and withstand appeals. You've provided the city with a January 15, 1994 date to provide final street improvement design in order to proceed with construction in the second quarter of 1994. 1 expect that their SEPA work will accompany their design. Renton's Alley Sewer project work will not be included as part of the phase II construction contract and therefore SEPA associated with Renton's alley sewers will not be a prerequisite to the advertisement/award of the construction contact. 2. Scope of Metro's SEPA Determination and checklist The checklist will include the proposed construction and activities associated with phase II & III of the Cedar River Trunk project. The reason for including phase III actions in this checklist is twofold: - the agency has determined the alignment for phase III through agreement with the City of Renton and as such has taken actions which would preclude the consideration of significant modifications to the phase III alignment; and - inclusion of phase III at this time is appropriate and required in accordance with WAC 197-11-060 and 070. l"amETR0 Memo M. Thibert December 16, 1993 page 2. 3. Alternatives Alignments It is still unclear whether easements can be obtained from private property owners where phase II & III transition. In order to maintain flexibility in the transition area, the project's environmental analysis and SEPA determination will include and address the alignment alternative you've identified. This alternative extends the alignment east along North Third before turning south along Sunset Boulevard. 4. Construction Contract Environmental Control Sections Mitigation identified in the checklists prepared will need to be included in the appropriate sections of your contract and noted where applicable on contract drawings. I will need to prepare text for inclusion into the phase II, as well as the phase III, construction contract prior its completion. Please continue to keep me informed on the project status. Contact me if I can clarify or answer any questions regarding the material presented in this memo. „mr=TR0 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building - 821 Second Ave. - Seattle, WA 98104-1598 - (206) 684-2100 November 9, 1993 90742 Y75 David Christensen Wastewater Utility Supervisor Utility Systems Division Planning Building/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project Phase III Project Schedule ARMS No. A65021; Task No. Y75 Dear Dave: I am responding to your letter of October 7, 1993 in which you note that the WSDOT I- 405 S Curve construction is approximately 18 months ahead of schedule, and request that Metro begin Phase III of the Cedar River Trunk Project. Metro has explored the feasibility of accelerating the Phase III project schedule to begin construction in the summer of 1995. In addition to design, there are other key issues Metro must complete prior to the bidding process. These issues include negotiations with the Parks Department, obtaining all necessary permits, and abandonment of the site by the WSDOT Contractor. Per the WSDOT Project Manager, Tom Madden, the S- Curve construction could be completed by October 1994. He has assumed the contractor will vacate the job site by the end of December 1994, but the contract will not officially end until the early summer of 1995. In your letter you also expressed a concern about the status of a vacant lot at 225 Sunset Blvd. North. A few parties have been interested in purchasing and developing the parcel. The Cedar River Trunk alignment runs through this property. To avoid potential conflicts with prospective buyers, you suggested that acquisition of an easement begin as soon as possible. Metro has already begun to prepare the groundwork for a property appraisal. As both agencies have agreed, the proposed Cedar River Trunk line is a direct route that minimizes construction impacts to the local community. It is our continued desire to build this alignment. Metro will pursue the construction easements to achieve this goal. However, if the easement can not be acquired, Metro might be forced to revise the pipe alignment. Your concerns seem well founded; in fact, it would not be prudent for Metro to pursue Phase H work without some assurance the entire relocation can be completed. Accordingly, I propose that Renton consider and approve the enclosed alternate route as a backup for the selected Phase III alternative. Your timely approval will allow Metro to bid Phase II in good faith without delay to our joint work. Without such assurances, Metro will not bid Phase H until the necessary easements for Phase III are acquired. David Christensen November 9, 1993 Page 2 As agreed, we will pursue Phase III design, and schedule that work around the site availability and easement acquisition. A tentative schedule is enclosed for your comment. Sincerely, Mann -Eing Thibert Project Manager MLT:sc/msk �,^,. cc: Roger Browne - 117 Bill Nitz - 130 Stan Hummel - 130 Marc Dallas - 122 CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PHASE III PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE TASK NO:Y75 TASK PR -DESIGN PHASE PROJECT:A65021 DURATION Draft Engineering Report 4 WK. Report Review & Comments 2 WK. Survey Request 4 WK. Soil Investigation 4 WK. Traffic Study 4 WK. DESIGN PHASE 30% Pipe Design & Spec. 8 WK. 30% Design Review/Comments 2 WK. Environment Review/SEPA 3 MON. Negotiate/Obtain Permits 10 MON. 90% pipe Design & Spec. 3 MON. 90% Design Review/Comments 4 WK. Construction Cost Estimates 2 WK. Request Division 0 4 WK. Final design Revision 2 WK. EXPECTED DATES 1/17/94 to 2/17/94 2/21/94 to 3/7/94 2/1/94 to 3/1/94 2/1/94 to 3/l/94 2/15/94 to 3/15/94 3/15/94 to 5/15/94 6/1/94 to 6/15/94 4/4/94 to 7/1/94 4/1/94 to 2/27/95 7/1/94 to 10/7/94 10/17/94 to 11/17/94 11/25/94 to 12/9/94 12/15/94 to 1/13/95 2/1/95 to 2/15/95 CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PHASE III PRE -CONSTRUCTION PHASE TASK Bidding Process Notice of Award Notice to Proceed CONSTRUCTION PHASE Construction Punch List Items As -Built Completion Project Close-out DURATION EXPECTED DATES 3 MON. 3/8 /95 to 6/8/95 6/8/95 6/12/95 4 MON. 6/12/95 to 10/12/95 2 WK. 10/16/95 to 11/30/95 4 Wk. 11/5/95 to 12/6/95 12/6/95 CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PHASE II TASK NO:Y75 PROJECT:A65021 PROJECT SCHEDULE AS FOR 11/29/1993 TASK DURATION EXPECTED DATES PR -DESIGN PHASE Draft Engineering Report --- ---- to 3/16/93 Report Review & Comments 3/16/93 to 3/30/93 Environmental Review/ 9/15/93 to 3/30/94 SEPA Survey Request 3/15/93 to 5/1/93 Soil Investigation 3/1/93 to 4/l/93 Traffic Study 12/1/93 to 1/15/94 Negotiate/Obtain Permits 11/15/93 to 2/15/94 DESIGN PHASE 30% Pipe Design & Spec. 4/15/93 to 6/15/93 30% Design Review & Comments 6/16/93 to 6/30/93 (without City's Street Design) 90% 42" Pipeline Design 7/l/93 to 11/5/93 Combine 90% Street Design & Spec. 1/17/94 to 2/15/94 (assumed Street Design complete by 1/15/94) Engineer estimate 1/17/94 to 1/24/94 Request Division 0 2/17/94 to 2/25/94 90% Design Review & Comments 2/28/94 to 3/18/94 Final design Revision 3/21/94 to 3/30/94 CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT PHASE II PRE -CONSTRUCTION PHASE TASK DURATION EXPECTED DATES Authority to Advertise 3/16/94 to 3/30/94 Print Bid Documents 3/31/94 to 4/8/94 Advertising for Bids 4/12/94 to 5/12/94 Pre -Bid Meeting/Job Tour 5/3/94 Bid opening 5/12/94 Bid Evaluation 5/13/94 to 5/20/94 Preparation for Council 5/24/94 to 6/7/94 Authorization Notice of Award 6/8/94 Notice to Proceed 6/10/94 CONSTRUCTION PHASE Pre -Construction Meeting 6/14/94 Construction 6/15/94 to 10/14/94 Punch List Items 10/15/94 to 11/5/94 As -Built Completion 11/5/94 to 12/6/94 Project Close-out 12/6/94 CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PHASE III PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE TASK DURATION EXPECTED DATES PR -DESIGN PHASE Draft Engineering Report 4 WK. 1/17/94 to 2/17/94 Report Review & Comments 2 WK. 2/21/94 to 3/7/94 Survey Request 4 WK. 2/1/94 to 3/1/94 Soil Investigation 4 WK. 2/1/94 to 3/1/94 Traffic Study 4 WK. 2/15/94 to 3/15/94 DESIGN PHASE 30% Pipe Design & Spec. 8 WK. 30% Design Review/Comments 2 WK. Environment Review/SEPA 3 MON. Negotiate/Obtain Permits 10 MON. 90% pipe Design & Spec. 3 MON. Engineer Estimates Request Division 0 90% Design Review/Comments Final design Revision Authority to Advertise Print Bid Documents Advertising for bids Bid Opening Bid Evaluation Council Authorization 4 WK. 2 WK. 3/15/94 to 5/15/94 6/1/94 to 6/15/94 4/4/94 to 7/1/94 4/1/94 to 2/27/95 7/l/94 to 10/7/94 9/26/94 to 9/30/94 10/1/94 to 10/20/95 10/17/94 to 11/17/94 12/1/94 to 12/15/95 3/8/95 to 3/22/95 3/25/95 to 3/30/95 4/2/95 to 5/3/95 5/3/95 5/4/95 to 5/11/95 5/12/95 to 5/26/95 CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PHASE III PRE -CONSTRUCTION PHASE TASK DURATION EXPECTED DATES Notice of Award 6/8/95 Notice to Proceed 6/12/95 CONSTRUCTION PHASE Construction Punch List Items As -Built Comnletion Project Close-out 4 MON. 6/12/95 to 10/12/95 2 WK. 10/16/95 to 11/30/95 4 Wk. 11/5/95 to 12/6/95 12/6/95 V VJ-I,Ij11i ♦ , • .' a �.., - \ \ o -•- •,,,1N 214+93 ♦ err I ti tl__ `\ .. _ _. / _ END CASs-IN-P ly - - \ BRIOG TO 8 S _i ;S I EF'P LACE rl 1 t1 \ -• / THIS C NTRA�r�Nt1CT_tti1 :,- iS` ED BdER F� T i - - I I -� r� �� A SR 169 •X(Ny I-- _ - BRIDGE G . +.1_.�I I ( '� I r��Y • 1 I DG 0 E s M - I BR 1 DCE TO BE REMOVED I C SR 169 OXINC . �� _ N 276+13.00 (l9'LT.) ! IBg'YCE/ 20'E JIg M I 1. � I •i':.•� o `\ � /- / ,:. - ..-_ . IN WALL '10 ni 4I LS 276+18.50 O 1 / I Y o u I BEGIN MALL '9 (34.97' T, /'YLN 276+62.00 i �' y �^ TO FAG OF MALL L 1+ 6rCIN SPECIAL TYPE . BARRIER TgAN 4 CONC, BARRIER CONCI �• �� i SI ION SECTION TYPE B I n I 4A I I \ o • ; .' _. _ _ 8 T 1 T 2;4 ' 2 7 7 1 r^ I 77 3 \ o // '" ; R +0() P.O. T. o i i mm m BE ire RAMP TAPER oo u 1" 0 ON LT. yrl II II \\ \ 0 �s a ro io NO RAMP T PER LT. S R i. RCO 78+07.29 P. T.= '� I 1 \ \ BR3 78+87.69 P•C i IM II 1 - o LN 279+00 P.O.T. Y 4 mm BEGIN HOV CROSSOV SIB ;Z4'127 T 2' 36i' ti s PER Rr. �; LS 279- P I \ .�� LN 279+02.90 i -� I 1 END HOV 0 I I \ \ CROSSOVER TAPER 1 • \ \ BEGIN SPECIAL TYPE 4 CONC. BAR 1 '�1 t 1 IIZ 1 i 111l'- ---__- l_ ti ENO STANDARD TYPE 2 BARRIER nSPECll CONC. -_ 1 �\ TRA SII,ION TYPE BARRIER r Z SEE DETAIL SHEET MO-5 I ^' + ,♦ ' � � _ - � � ' r� I a S '_ l; I I �� I C•5 11 � n l 1. t I 1 41.1�0 q 11 taEi- e Lq Cam' 'nzx m c' o cn rN' a ' 1 m„n, 1 jt7 :II I I:1}O ------ m .n m z •� ♦ s I S ' o 0 in o-; °' o h m s m oz ♦ \� I o z= . 1 1 1 I 1 '' _ r•- i > I ` o m m to \ K s n+.1 ^1 _ L�. Cyr >sm zn.-. = m r� cl s N '-' n N a '^ -• v+ \ \ I a r ,+, t( N j t , I I 'C M I O /' m� Z7 a �. Z m o !: o rn � r m m y r o r \ \� �+ ^' I 11 1 I I I 1. rn N Z. co:- m.' ovZi 2 \ z Dom s I I j�l ;11 I i rTl o I 1 11 1 Ij l I 1, �) I• 1 �1� / �i�/ta l I I mi a y I ♦ momm;o co t� I I I I� H + � .. ♦ � � � � I � m l � 1 la � I I I Ill I \ � \ 83 13.6T END SPECIAL TYP Iv 1 7 11 1 \ CONC, BARRIER TRANSmoN BARRIER c II 1 II I 1� I ` ♦' / �a H 83+ TYPE 9 �LS 283+88.27 ENO MA %� END PAVING H - WALL '9 (38.867.) 31�Ilvi�l?l31�V �11 �vv� — LINE Al'APPROACH SLAB ' 0 FAC r BRIDGE TO BE CONSTR CTEp e - t r--"- -- _ _ -1 ,= :1:• - \ CONTRACT rirr�Jlijri/ 1� I---- i —•�--- —I _ SR 405 BR 21 E 6 M r' - �� 'BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED I r LN 284+68.24 (61.76 RT.) l I BEGIN 1 --•' - 1 RAMP SHOULDER TAP �LS 285+14.42 _I't'� i._.- _ _-- ♦♦ -• I APPR-A�H SLAB I v i v 80GFACIN MALL y,'.11 (\j8.s¢14r.r 1' Ila E QF pAL L \�\ 1 1 1 t\ 1 I I C- Or - LN 285+18.53 I o om � - ?\\ \\ 1 I,rl I I •- 11 � II � ` BEGIN SPECIAL TYPE a I T`-' \\ 1 1\1,11 IIY 1j LI CONC. BARR BARRIER ! az m \ - I I It1 1, 11 `� PLANNING/ BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ,b-UTILITY SYSTEMS DIVISION - 235-2631 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION - 235-2620 TO: C-noo DATE: VA&Z ZO, / ¢ JOB NO.: 82 SErav M. S / RE: SI sE1 ✓ G�� / �ZTa ✓ SSE ( /o¢-/ ATTN: �An1 L�iZewN GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ PRINTS ❑ REPRODUCIBLE PLANS o o COPY OF LETTER ❑ SPECIFICATIONS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: COPIES DATE NUh®ER DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS Di•/L �c o / V c-- 2 S_ a l � O ✓.z �S E THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED FOR YOUR USE o APPROVED AS NOTED ❑ AS REQUESTED o RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ COPIES TO: ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION o RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US SIGNED TITLE IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE I1® W, P2" W -RENTON Mt 17 23 - L_J L —7, it rle —A 13 60 13' 60 ljJ Acal 141; 15 .16 3; 3 0 :3 joS,_ - 16 16 38j p loo 3 M338 [10 a IS 1 335 �17 �f 117 V 330 ae 19 4 J9 D F20 wl, 20 , o3jo _6 f3z 71 NO - 21. 4 n3i 7 Sib 22 19 317: CH 2; 23 24 2 3 315 4v B� 7" go 17! Ll 14 Apr k 4:icy 243 AP 301 0 'SK ec, r r 10 &L- 14 E24 8:' L 74S 16* 11 16 7d) N DIV r -4$ 18Q 21 S srernW) �jr. lb171. 3 L p- E8]20 ­7QU 6 M. 2 5 -4 4Xar45r 4veljTE U�_ C.', IYO 3CPST 11214 Lis: E-4 IT HAMMOND, COLLIER & WADE - LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4010 STONE WAY NORTH SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98103 TELEPHONE: (206) 632-2664 FAX: (206) 632-0947 TO ! 4 s_ GENTLEMEN: — WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings Copy of letter LIEUTEa o[F UMMMAOUML DATE /�'l Jot! NO. 1 A TTEN TIO RE ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Change order ❑ ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO, DESCRIPTION M �- ss sa!•dC�l� THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: 00 For review ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ No exceptions taken ❑ Exceptions as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ a REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for review ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 1 r`I"-r4 -e!F-cSo1L 7�'k 3'r"4- e� s Aie'-, -/0 /SSvt c"+ surw., /'LC 60 CT'✓ 4S S i7 t,c 1 �'� ��-� �-- COPY TO (. r 74, JVN Ala ke,, SIGNED: It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 4'0 MANHOLE & 8" SS LATERAL PIPE CONNECTION SCHEDULE - R /I W STAI CL RAW i IE �8" (B) i IE 8" (B) IE 8" (A) IE 8" (A) MANHOLE OFFSET DIST L IE 42" OFFSET DISTANCE R NOTE STATION IE OF 4Z IE OF 8" APPROX MANHOLE * OFFSET RLGHT(R) IE OF 8" ® 8" CONN ® (A) * * OR REMARKS 1. 1 +50 18.25 - _ (R) _ _ uw6 he."" urd 2. 5+22 19.37 - - �/Z (R) - = 5A' SW /�/� - lv��(�a..�g-(�.edls Alky 3. 8+01 20.20 - - (R) 4. 104-81 21.05 - - 3 � � (R) - ZC� � - p�2iC - P�t�Y •9zLGy/ 5. 13+64 21.89 - - �31 (R) - Z7 q" _ �r/I2pCti - I�A,2�IrAGGE�t 6. 18+09 23.23 - - '�p I' (R) _ 28 '3 - G PI' ` /ti�E,gp „ 4iley 7. 20+89 24.07 - - (R) - '29 FACT-O&K hi-14-1 8. 22+22.73 24.47 - - IY� jj - SGC- CONN TO METRO MH R10-5A, vs *�) = CENTER OF MH �i PtT 2S S 6 YL 4' MANHOLE DETAIL SHALL_ BE PER CITY OF RENTON STANDARD PLANS, PAGE B071. cac ►-- CONTRACTOR TO THE MANHOLE SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE AND 8 SEWER CONNECTIONS. LOCATIONS AND INVER . , ELEVATIONS, PRIOR�4r' 7, -1I r 7 k-7-1 =`Fri ;-:�- •..r - -•.r=:•-,=„ �' 1 ��DA.�l4=• i� TT-IE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS FOURTH FLOOR 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055-2189 FAX: 235-2541 FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: _ 1_SEP; Z 8 / � 3 To: ZYAAZA Z ZIAI � �� ' FAX#: (nS4 - I7/ O FROM: Jo Hti1 �4013Son j PHONE#: 2-7 7 _ (o f 7 5 SUBJECT: C�-n�� ��/ ���J LIALL P�— Number of pages excluding cover shecc (N ii/I.>�n�./m�<c/FnX(:Ovl'It U(>C/hh - NOTE: Kroll Maps are compiled from NO E: KrpII Maps are compiled from Ofticit and Field Surveys. Theyare produced and FieldSurv5ys. They are produced for retE — only and no warranty is expressed or only and no warranty is expressed or implie Aprs ,� 6 I6 0 60 I © Q Rf TO S NO L • I U a 7 17 2 173 4I N 1. ec aNN L `° ! 'b°dS1� 35 3 z351• 12 13 i 14 [ !Iz 35o N 20 3® S• 20 3 3 60 I 8 . 22 23 25 26 L22 39 6 2133 tP�i (1 ® �o33j N 3 3©4 7 22 as 2 33o g 23 [E . �/� /� AR/ON U 332 32 9 2 325 Aldo / , I �'//`•1 / V �J T 25 ` 3� 10 : �r rs. 26 19 a © 20 ! I 26 2 j 3 4 S 6 12 V 4o ' 80 OJ s l T� 28 311 310 1313 i 1414,19^� 33 L.6 17 y _0 UP 14 29 , IS 30 cs Q ID ©' Zn -- o 140 \ti TQS6q 6ROC b ERrAV R I� Y a • lV I� t✓ _ /p 16 Q 242 3 16 aal 3 17 39 • 3© 4 11 37 10 13 14 is sza; a srr C� 4�� ? y� 18 2®• ° Z36 S 18 Q• gc if oo `i ���s� /O \ P�� ,�io 19 7 min of; U 4 �Q 1q N. BROOKS,.a ST. \� p223 • 22z , II : y d< an Q :. `�'' W 22 _ zts 22 c Z ®2'S zl 23 21s Q e 5 ? w 24 [ 25 20 W ®12 25 V 120 O m 2 A?r. 03 13 •�C � � EN ON 0 03 - 10 � '�� t•�. b I?A �O ti24.j e`q� WI 9 re 3 10 Its 13< - I@ 4 a1 III 13 r us ,�5 12 l 2 W iE -- s ` I o s s* p 4; a .P 3S r:: �• ; �;_ . !15 84 . o a- 6,oan 6C e s � v .• •+;J►: •—' ram/ �. \ Gr ti � i I .�I� lY \• .• �• •�. III, ��. I•I 17 y�j 12 \�0 ! \\:: Earl Clymer, Mayor October 5, 1993 Mann -Ling Thibert Engineering Services Division Metro 821 Second Avenue, M.S. 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT PHASE II Dear Mann -Ling: The following is the City of Renton's Wastewater Utility's recommendation concerning the profile of the proposed Metro 42 inch sanitary sewer trunkline. The proposed profile as indicated on the 50% design plans is adequate to serve the City's collector lines that are located south of North 3rd Street. To avoid the higher costs associated with lowering the Metro line, the City will approve the proposed profile. During public meetings, the new trunkline location was approved by Metro, the City's Wastewater Utility and the residents in the project area because of it's ability to serve the local area. However, the proposed profile is not deep enough to allow the alley sewers north of North 3rd Street to be served by the new line. In order to serve the alleys to the north, the City's collector lines will have to be routed to the North 4th Street system. Since the system in North 4th Street has insufficient capacity to accommodate it's service area at full build -out, it will need to be upgraded. As a compromise, in consideration of allowing Metro to build the interceptor at the proposed depth to reduce construction costs, the City requests that Metro install at no cost to the City, the collector stubs and manholes (8 total) which will serve the neighborhood to the south of North 3rd Street (see attached map). The City will assume the costs and install the improvements in the North 4th Street system. If this proposal is acceptable to Metro, please submit a letter from the appropriate Metro official indicating acceptance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (206) 277-6179. Sincerely, ,V John D. Hobson Wastewater Utility H:DOCS:93-958:JDH:ps CC Bob Bergstrom, Hammond Collier & Wade -Livingstone 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 t - 1 j'�]�,�`� R E (� T N w + + L' NOTE: Krell Maps are compiled from Official Records Field Surveys. They for „z— , ►- �J [. I �J ` �--t-� --..z�,^ -.'... -,. �.. -J II I L�J a �� and are produced reference use d no warr sed or - I only an anty is expressed implied. J6` II �r he a o ,/7s ,.. co " 3s 14 13 60 0 14 ` 13 oz o .60 •:_. fi 9 s �o ' //zs 14 II z j ®CIS a 13 331 33L 3 1 10 al < [3a� 16 I I Q = < 16 11 lam` 14 k 32A r77-s 16 9 335 ; ®(� 1 v 338 n 10 337 }77$n a 333 IS d 335: 33 I8 9 335 < { 1 17 = �' �, s Oz 7329 = 330 �3 9 8 3 I •(�a n 4 Is 31 r!Q r 6E], i p 0 326 20 7 0 w 18 313 - 3 20 S L]I . 320 21 23 322 21 323 6IS g ics 3t0 S 21 4 31 7 . 316 22 IH 22 5 I a - 3 I, 3 24 2 3 315 v 312 r 4 315 = 31 23 4 315 �. m W ` 708 24 3 �< ; l0 1A 2S 3aP 2 5 04,2 '' `— 043 e ----- (^ 1,- a ;so 13 1 c?0 12 -2 it 3 �10 q '� ` g S 8 r 32 7 6 - WO • 7 31 6 - 8 9 y 24 10 ;.'6o r 3 s so �s 1 N21 I� 1 130 0 Mgt: a r 32 8 23 32 - 33o S 23 32 ev N. - N - 2 3 I !3 14 g o 40 40 rz 4 s 6 9` )0 11 n,t 4° '80 ,r' PoGbsFr� t WNHo�F� 17 I� 19 'Q N Co%A,vEcno,-/S 40 a 9 ?Q 3? 32 9 �+ 111 26 to 11 26 w 12 27 31 12 Z7 - 310 13 W 34 310 13 28 0 = ® 14 _29 Q {4 29 30 c� Sn - 3 --- e - Q' 13 111 y 4 e� n —=— --�3 ` 14 10 31 J : ®� `ISM zas o <5 I za7 Is Q �G e ®16 II 2ao 16 for — Q S 23? ® I7 0 ?3P 17 10Qv- ,� 7-1 75. t 18 Q 21 4 t3 s er, It.S Q9 h oo • 2 227 (��4 7 22 22�8 70 7 w 2 T. L7 I ZZtj f 10 ec a ® S`J`,� 216 22 5 21 22 s ' z 8 6 9:rz9 23 4 • 21z 23 4 . b U-- 1- 5 rzs , t , a" PI 2c• 24 3 2n Q 6J \ ----- 4 LIJ 3 10h �' 0 h too 26 97111 !do 1�21 p M2 ] 60 \ \ �W )A t� 10 -,�-' IS/T6 65 4: S. S/.Tb 7s r n k a7 2 A IN 6=1 o rt I � S' i12 � 248 12 a 2'i 1 / A 7, 0 II 3 3, I 2 a gg 10 4 V13 z4•o • ®2 9 Z H3 _ _T 7 231 . 8 6 _ z•so tz _ a: 7 7 8 223 ©- MI 6 214 t 210 20 10 o�li <^.90 sa I 211 Zc7 z �2 = -e LJ ® ®2 Id zsr e IS 24 ° Ljj7M I 2 14M — 40 — 15 , E4 3 4 5 6 Q 203 16 M z 4? 33 16 2ar< 4 1700, 04 17 El < 10 13 14 IS `7 7 �. 9/ ,® 5 18219= 23b 5 18_�• EN 6 19 20 ©< 6 = D76 7 1 - BROOKS --a ST. N ' 2� z = 22 ©223 < ` t. 222 1 21 e �2S �� ° b y tU i 9 220. < Ip ®zls < C) 21 z1s < I( 24 211 1 24QZ 6 2 12 25 20 W :Z ® 12 25 120 cn O 13 2 AP'• 11113 ST e Izo 10 3 10 us I� 4 41 nt 116 .5 I 12 11�l 'R Earl Clymer, Mayor September 22, 1993 Mann -Ling Thibert Metro 821 Second Avenue- M/S 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lvnn Gnttmnnn e�minichro Mr SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PHASE III Dear Mann -Ling: The Washington State Department of Transportation's 1-405 S-Curve project is approximately 18 months ahead of schedule (Renton City Council minutes enclosed). Since the estimated completion of their project is in October, 1994, the City believes this is an appropriate time to begin Phase III of the Cedar River Trunkline Relocation project. One area of concern is the lot east of the intersection of Brooks Avenue South and Houser Way North. There have been a few parties interested in purchasing and developing this parcel. Since the alignment of the relocated trunkline is through this property, acquisition of and easement for the new sewer should begin as soon as =cere av 'd poten ' I conflicts with perspective buyers. r i 15;1,av1u i i. t-stensen Waste r Utility Supervisor H:DOCS:93-923:JDH:ps CC: John Hobson 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS PAPER CONTAINS 50% RECYCLED MATERIAL, IW% POST CONSUMER June 7, 1993 Monday, 7:30 p.m. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting M I N U T E S Municipal Buii z2 Council Charn_.E:-- CALL TO ORDER Mayor Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF BOB EDWARDS, Council President; TIM SCHLITZER; TONI NELSISN. COUNCILMEMBERS NANCY MATHEWS; JESSE TANNER; RICHARD STREDICKE. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBER KATHY KEOLKER- WHEELER. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Executive Assistant to : -- ATTENDANCE Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; CINDY ANDERSGN. Deputy City Clerk; LYNN GUTTMANN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; KAY SHODDY, Planning/Technical Services Director; SUE CARLSON, Economic Development Specialist; PAUL LUMBERT, Transportation Engineer; BILL HUTSENPILLER, Parks _k Recreation Director; LT. RICK STODDARD, Police Department. PRESS Jeff Bond, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF Correction to the 5/24/93 minutes: Page 241, paragraph 2, line 7, should COUNCIL MINUTES read: "one property has a garage that is collapsed." MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MAY 24, 1993, AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. PROCLAMATION Mayor Clymer proclaimed the week of June 6-12, 1993, as Safety Safety Awareness Week, Awareness Week, acknowledging the right of all City employees to a safe 6/6-12/93 and healthful work place by supporting a reduction in accidents and injuries through inspections and training. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. SPECIAL Tom Madden, Project Engineer for Washington State Department of PRESENTATION Transportation (WSDOT) I-405 S-Curve project, reported that the project WSDOT: I-405 S Curve is progressing ahead of schedule with estimated completion in October, Project 1994. The next traffic switch will move northbound I-405 traffic to the new bridge on 6/19 and southbound traffic will move to the new section on 6/26. Demolition of the center portion of the SR-169 bridge is scheduled for 6/ 18 and will require a closure of SR-169. The demolition of the center portion of the 3rd Street bridge will begin the week of 6/28 with night time closures during the week. Demolition of both viaducts will begin 6/21, and continue through the end of July or mid -August. Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Madden stated that the Carco Theatre and Renton Community Center entrance will be affected by the closure of SR-169, but detour signs will be posted and the Cedar River underpass located off Bronson Way will be available for access. O K S S-T R E-E-T--- SIDEWALK ENDS x x DUNN LUMBER YARD X FIGURE 5 MONITORING WELL MW-5 LOCATION SKETCH (Not to Scale) r ETRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684-2100 August 26, 1993 Mr. John Hobson City of Renton Utility Systems Division Planning/Building/Public Works Dept 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project Phase II: Pipe Profile ARMS No. A65021; Task No. Y75 Dear John: 90626 Y75 1 1993 CITY OF RENTON Engineering Depi. Thank you for attending the meeting on August 23, 1993. The meeting went well and we exchanged a considerable amount of important information. I believe we will work closely together to achieve the project goal. Following our phone conversation this morning, this letter summarizes my concerns about lowering the 42-inch pipe profile. I must emphasize that the lowering could be critical to the cost and timing of the project. The Metro pipe will perform well as designed. Lowering the pipe will increase excavation costs, shoring costs, and possibly the size of the equipment needed. If we go below the water table, it may necessitate de -watering, at great cost, and may increase the risk of displacing adjacent residential foundations. While lowering the Metro pipe would benefit the City by increasing the slope and flow capacity in the City pipes, it is of questionable benefit to Metro and may not be worth the extra risk and expense. If we lower our pipe to suit City convenience, will the City agree to pay the additional costs? Our amended MOA with the City stipulates we must finish the project design by the end of this year and begin construction no later than second quarter of 1994. To meet this commitment, Metro's design work must be completed by the end of October 1993 for 90% design review. At this point, design work is put on hold temporarily, pending the City's decision on how to proceed with the overall City sewer system layout. I understand that the City's new consultant will need some time to study this task. Please let me know when the City has reached a decision. Mr. John Hobson August 26, 1993 Page 2 A timely response will be appreciated, and is critical to keeping our time schedule. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Mann -Ling Thibert Project Manager MLT:sc/mskii— cc: David Christensen - City of Renton Bill Nitz - 130 Stan Hummel - 130 .5 /9 ! &YAP v L o �L v o o �!ti!s • M. s 5� �4 �g s �aanv'eic Ala FEW �✓ E? � fJG't� �' O M c ' B S eAf&vlrt9 e""SHAA.Wvo.' VAJ e O It �+ s� Ti,✓G L -ro J'AMETRO Letter of Transmittal 821 Second Ave., M.S. 117, Seattle, WA 98104-1598 (206) 684-1298 To rT/ 6) G1V/ - We are sending you the following: VIAttached ❑ under separate cover Date /co11t►eot To Attention Of G AV l7 c'flkc/ ST %BSc Regarding Copies Date Drwg. No. Description i P6: AZI C- Z 4 cL' These are transmitted: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use and information ❑ As requested 4 For review and comment ❑ Other Remarks 1, — 42 �-�-f�. /iZ1 `7/y��N �'r (/� S/ o/,-/ f-o)C-y� Pe/Z CPoyN,� G c rl l , tJ O � T/i C S elli/� S i l% c O f / f/� S / ��c c l`/fi %� !L ,A4fi (/J t b A) %flE A) o 12 i ,A-/ S' 1 12 c �pU/,,I' -P&,AJ5 E7 QC%ck'e f%LI c17 ZIT /J[ C C %� :z Signature , i Title Division a®et (tz1et) v 46 ..LL Earl Clymer, Mayor April 29, 1993 Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E. Metro 821 Second Avenue- M/S 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT PHASE II Dear Mann -Ling: As per our meeting on April 26, 1993, 1 have enclosed the following: • City of Renton Standard Plans and Specifications; • Sanitary sewer manhole depths and location map; and • Water monitoring well soil information. I will forward a copy of the "North Renton Sewer Replacement" scope of work and survey data as soon as I receive it from our consultants. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277-6179. Sincerely, ohn Hobson, Project Manager Wastewater Utility C:DOCS:93-434:JDH:ps CC: David Christensen Enclosures 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS PAPFR CONTAINS SIh RFCYCI.F.D MATFRIAL. 10 POW CnN¢I IMFR , -0 ��T5-- u dill , / r ECG 0 11 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET nn DATE`-IC:� TIME WEATHER ` MATERIAL} -- CONDITION DEPTH TO MANHOLE NO.5e CA � i2 I S e . I INF OUTLET A INLET B MANHOLE NO. H Lk� 20% INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter a 6 Material r `� Debris Type & Depth Water Depth F Ioaa-644" Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS a 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE TIME MATE RIAL13r,C% CONDITION DEPTH TO MANHOLE NO. ��}• IZ # 2c� AU gam" , LINE OUTLET A MANHOLE NO. C li� INLET B INLET C INLET D Lk � 0.-/ IN[ FT F Diameter Material � , Debris Type & Depth Water Depth F� Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS a SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE TIME WEATHER MATERIAL bl' ON CONDITI �� PT H L-A -DDre- ____f0 MANHOLE NO.-4�-5 r11171 CT a INI FT R MANHOLE NO. 611 INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter Material Con C KE e C O c V d Debris Type & Depth Water Depth ."w G.R4D. Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS L c-A"e - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET S�crtoa � � DATE" I a -- 8 TIME WEATHER MATERIAL By1c L� CONDITION t�j 3 ' � ll � seC��IZ TO MANHOLE NO. D 11, V1. W-ellS A. l� j LINE OUTLET A INLET B MANHOLE NO. — !] 9// L'4 201 INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter Material Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Flour-G440. O /� Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS_ Lat ( J zK r�'CS ,'�ktrft"j cvk;(4'6(1na SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE — 1 TIME WEATHER (� MATERIAL IO �, C LL CONDITION DEPTH TO MANHOLE NO. --ft- j y LINE OUTLET A INLET B 5e MANHOLE NO. 10 L4 7c'/ INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter l i Material_ — Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Ftuw-6-P-Q, i V' Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS_ SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE <6 —IS �S t TIME WEATHER MATERIAL CONDITION 1 �l DE N � �_A T,-),D [.�2_ TO MANHOLE NO. # jq -A H (2y pf-C ef : f'_ f3i-vn , t---,-e 11 � i- �tv K--- LINE OUTLET A INLET B S; an- (�D tl� / � MANHOLE N0. IJ �_! `) zo.11 INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter Material �— Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS /0 Ps' SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE TIME WEATHER p MATERIAL D f '� t- CONDITION D T H �� f TO MANHOLE NO. 15 Lot-QA-too ��Ile (1I I IN N. �j `l A rc- < F ntJTLET A INLET B 5 c c-rt, t MANHOLE NO. 4 2C INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter v Material Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Flail G.w M . i 11 r Velocity fps. prepared by CcI REMARKS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE—��—, TIME WEATHER MATERIAL b ritL CONDITION DEPTH' �c! 6'2 TO MANHOLE NO. 11 T `1 V s+ N. e-rw kA rvl-I e A ve LINE OUTLET A INLET B 13Eal(0tJ I'1 MANHOLE NO. 9// G,1 D INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter Material &CL Debris Type & Depth Water Depth I<1 Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS DATE'S—ICj TIME WEATHER MATERIAL bVIC��- CONDITION DEPTH 5 ��n 1,Pk ') iL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET TO MANHOLE NO. S4-, ?,-t Lo n , pa ,f kL 0-�Ve, C-) cjL r e,v� A ve_ LINE OUTLET A MANHOLE NO. INLET B INLET C INLET D INLET E l� Diameter N ' Material Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATES — I TIME WEATHER MATERIALLY �GL CONDITIQN DEPTH N �' TO MANHOLE NO. #fig vOCAT(oO N 0-c- N. 61W k7, 67a*-d e4-7 &e LINE OUTLET A t,A DPI. %7 MANHOLE NO. 2 INLET B INLET C INLET D 00 INLET E Diameter Material Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE TIME WEATHER r MATERIAL CONDITION 06 PTH — -76MANHOLE NO. 22— Zr" C�S4 . gilph Q 0, r- 6 e0 Ave. I fYLOCJCWAve Lock &Ae- MANHOLE NO. C:; 3 I IMP ni 1T1 FT A INLET B INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter If Material Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS_ 2✓ k (Mrry r SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE-- tC( ',+ TIME WEATHER MATERIAL P CONDITION DEPTH 51� TO MANHOLE NO. ?,G �... 0 (,A l- t Ord J � " I D IJ r, i✓ of A I In-1 ►3fwh, rn`actcw (�► o r4 h of f V .2 ", S+ . t� S , of r d S+ LINE OUTLET A INLET B MANHOLE NO. 2 INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter Material VL �C Debris Type & Depth Water Depth GIA A�!'1 A\a , U." Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS . ZZ f SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE — TIME ` WEATHER MATERIAL PY-J-X-(Q CQNDIT ON DEPTH TO MANHOLE NO. 2 MANHOLE NO. LINE OUTLET A INLET BJ INLET IN[ FTn Diameter Material 1 Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Velocity fps. V prepared by REMARKS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE — !CJ TIME WEATHER j MATE RIAL$N IC��— CONDITION -DEPTH �- �fr 5���. ►2 TO MANHOLE NO. 22`} 31 ( Faci-o,�) Av' LINE OUTLET A INLET B MANHOLE NO. 21 I_ 1 D Zo el INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter @�j 60 Material 1 Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS L 0-CJ 8'2 r I s CoY ro,- 6 h SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE TIME WEATHER MATERIAL CONDITI-ON DEPTH N _-,T"AN HO LE NO. # !7—q ,20 4 &I r- LINE OUTLET A INLET B GIf MANHOLE NO. 4 30 L. 4 2-0 Z/ INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter Material ^ Debris Type & Depth Water Depth FlwmA Q." Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS DATE S—n—(S - TIME WEATHER MATERIALIL- CONDITIO DEPTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET "1V PTO MANHOLE NO. 3C 12o T-auto, r Ave I a4d ff LINE OUTLET A INLET B MANHOLE N0. 31 INLET C INLET D INLET E Diameter 8(, O �' 9/" Material Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS Iln SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE'S — TIME WEATHER MATERIAL �pY1C.l�- CONDITION DEPTH i� 0 MANHOLE NO:�3+ er-rfanL. h• or "3'1 Ste, s e+ s I vd . N. s pok f s 7 r MANHOLE NO. J LINE OUTLET A INLET B INLET C INLET D ��► L1 G( 2011 INLET E Diameter Material ! Debris Type & Depth Water Depth Pbvv'GP'B. Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS_ SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SURVEY REPORT SHEET DATE '3 , Iq TIME WEATHER{� MATERIAL hC�� CONNWT-IQN DEPTH TO MANHOLE N0.*35 [3e�► ��d Al V c�c u Lkrv1 cz , of 205 5�v�se� 81v� N LINE OUTLET A INLET B INLET C I acide r sue+ ev-) 17? MANHOLE NO. J�O INLET D INLET E Diameter is,/ 1511 Material �S•J l Debris Type & Depth Water Depth -Fluvv.,e-P.0- Velocity fps. prepared by REMARKS icQP r i,S aworb,tn THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS FOURTH FLOOR 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055-2189 FAX: 235-2541 FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE-.j—gJ TO: ,uv rim i FAX#: /% FROM: \ Ile &I 14e, ?:;,s "� l PHONE#: f —(' 125 SUBJECT: Number of pages excluding cover sheet: 9- 11/1 - orms/m iSC/FA XOVER.D0(.'/hh D m z D m z C m z 0 —i 2 TELEPHONE POLE NORTH SECOND STREET 49' a' 1 4' 2' NORTH SECOND STREET MW-4 GRASS BOULEVARD SIDEWALK G RASS TRUCK REPAIR SHOP FIGURE 4 MONITORING WELL MW-4 LOCATION SKETCH (Not to Scale) CH2'M HILL MONITORING WELL LOG PROJECT: CITY OF RENTON GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS NUMBER: 520080.A0 COMPLETION DATE: January 29, 1986 LOCATION: RENTON, WASHINGTON GROUND ELEVATION: 36.9 ft MSL PVC CASING ELEVATION: 36.4 ft, MSL DEPTH TO WATER FROM GROUND 6 DATE: 16.9 ft., 2-22-86 DEPTH I DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS BELOW I SURFACE I (feet) I 0 + SANDY LOAM, coarse sand, brown and some I silty clay I 5 I + SAND AND GRAVEL, coarse sand with fine, rounded I gravel I I 10 I + SAND, coarse sand and some fine gravel I I 15 t y I I + I I I SAND, coarse sand and some fine to coarse, 20 + rounded gravel I 25 I I + I I I SAND, fine to coarse sand and minor fine gravel I 30 + I I I GRAVEL, fine to red rounded gravel and I sore coarse sand 35 + 40 I I + I SAND AND GRAVEL, coarse sand with fine to red, I rounded gravel I 45 1 + I I I SAND, fine to coarse sand and minor fine gravel 1 50 + END OF BORING I WELL: MW-4 DRILLING METHOD: CABLE TOOL, 8-INCH CASING DRILLER: HOKKAIDO DRILLING AND DEVELNVIENT CO, GRAHAM, WA INSPECTOR: SCOTT MCKINLEY / SEA SAMPLING METHOD: EXAMINATION OF BAILED CUTTINGS RECORD I WELL CONSTRUCTION DRAWING I DETAILS Concrete meter box with lid 8' steel casing with locking cap (See Generalized Well Construction diagram for detail) Cement/bentonite seal 2' SCH 40 PVC threaded flush coupled casing Bentonite pellets Centering guide Fine sand Sand pack (Monterey- Aqua #8) Machine slotted SCH 40 PVC screen (20 slot size) Centering guide 4atural formation aottom sump End cap FIGURE 11 MW-4 WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM 4�J DUNN LUMBER YARD FIGURE 5 MONITORING WELL MW-5 LOCATION SKETCH (Not to Scale) CH2M HILL MONITORING WELL LOG PROJECT: CITY OF RENTON GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS NUMBER: S20080.AO COMPLETION DATE: January 31, 1986 LOCATION: RENTON, WASHINGTON GROUND ELEVATION: 38.8 ft MSL PVC CASING ELEVATION: 38.�2 ft, MSL DEPTH TO WATER FROM GROUND 6 DATE: 17.4 ft, 2-22-86 DEPTH 1 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS II BELOW I II SURFACE I II (feet) I II I 0 + SILTY -CLAY LOAM, brown I I I I 5 + I I CLAY, approximate 4' layer of gray clay I SAND, fine to coarse sand and some fine I to ned rounded gravel. Trace of brown silt 10 + SAND AkD GRAVEL, coarse sand with fine gravel I I I I 15 + I SAND, coarse sand and some fine to coarse I rounded gravel 20 + I I I I 25 + SILTY CLAY, dark gray -brown, plastic and I clumpy I i I 30 + GRAVEL, fine to wed, rounded gravel and I some coarse sand, grayish in color I I I 35 + I I SAND, wed to coarse sand and some fine I to med, rounded gravel, brown 1 40 + I I I I 45 + I I I I 50 + END OF BORING I WELL: MW-5 DRILLING METHOD: CABLE TOOL, 8-INCH CASING DRILLER: HOKKAIDO DRILLING AND DEVELDPEA£M CO, GRAHAM, WA INSPECTOR: SCOTT MCKINLEY / SEA SAMPLING METHOD: EXAMINATION OF BAILED CUTTINGS RECORD I WELL CONSTRUCTION DRAWING I DETAILS Concrete meter box with lid 8' steel casing with locking cap (See Generalized Well Construction diagram for detail) Cewent/bentonite seal 2' SM 40 PVC threaded flush coupled casing Bentonite pellets Centering guide Fine sand Sand pack (Monterey- Aqua #8) Machine slotted SCH 40 PVC screen (20 slot size) Centering guide Natural formation Bottom sump End cap FIGURE 12 MW-5 WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM OLD SARTORI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL s• 2' 0 Q Y w J -J Q � 0 w CO 0 N fn N Q CC MW-10 w Z) Z w Q Z w 0 Q C7 NORTH 3RD STREET FIGURE 3 MONITORING WELL MW-10 LOCATION SKETCH (Not to Scale) C10 HILL MONITORING WELL LOG PROJECT: CITY OF RENTON GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS NUMBER: 520080.A0 COMPLETION DATE: April 23, 19M LOCATION: RENTON, WASHINGTON GROUND ELEVATION: 34.0 ft, MSL PVC CASING ELEVATION: 34.12 ft, MSL DEPTH TO WATER FROM GROUND & DATE: 13.8 ft., 4-30--86 DEPTH BELOW SURFACE (feet) 0 5 10 15 N 25 30 J5 40 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS I SILTY LOAM, brown to black I I I SANDY SILT, fine sand with some med to coarse I sand and fine gravel, brown SILTY SAND AND GRAVEL, brown silt, mostly coarse sand to fine gravel SANDY, GRAVELLY SILT, layered zones of silty sand and gravel, and gravelly silt, fine to oed gravel, gray silt SILTY CLAY, with some fine to med gravel and a little fine sand, soft, no thread, blue - gray END OF BORING WELL: MW--10 DRILLING METHOD: CABLE TOOL, 8-INCH CASING DRILLER: HOKKAIDO DRILLING AND DEVELOPEHENT CO, 6RAHAM, WA INSPECTOR: J. NINTEMAN / SEA SAMPLING METHOD: EXAMINATION OF BAILED CUTTINGS RECORD I WELL CONSTRUCTION DRAWING I DETAILS I Concrete Teter box with lid 8' steel casing with locking cap (See Generalized Well Construction diagram for detail) Cement/bentonite seal 2 - in. SCH 40 PVC casing. Flush threaded. Bentonite Pellets Fine sand Centering guide Sand Pack (Monterey- Aqua Il8) Machine slotted SCH 40 PVC screen (20 slot size) Natural formation Bottom sump End cap I I I FIGURE 6 MW-10 WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM MW-11® w 6 Z w Q ti J J W Q Y LLI J J Q 0 w m 0 fN H N Q CC 0 NORTH SECOND STREET HOUSE (224 Wells Ave j FIGURE 4 MONITORING WELL MW-11 LOCATION SKETCH (Not to Scale) DO HILL MONITORING WELL LOG PROJECT: CITY OF RENTON GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS N P(BER: S20080. AO COMPLETION DATE: April 27, 1986 LOCATION: RENTON, WASHINGTON GROUND ELEVATION: 32.0 ft, MSL PVC CASING ELEVATION: 32.24 ft, MSL DEPTH TO WATER FROM GROUND & DATE: 12.0 ft, 4-30-86 DEPTH I DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS BELOW I SURFACE I (feet) I I I 0 + SANDY SILT, fine sand, with a trace of fine I gravel, soft, brown I I I increasing sand and gravel content J + I I I I SILTY SAND AND WOOD DEBRIS, fine sand, dark 10 + brown to black, soft I I I I iJ + I I SANDY SILT, with trace of wood debris, dark gray I I 20 + I I I SAND AND GRAVEL, mostly coarse sand to fine I gravel and some brown silt 25 + I I I I same but with some wood chips 30 + I I I I 35 + SAND AND GRAVEL, coarse sand to med gravel, I rounded, hole is making alot of water I I I 40 + END OF BORING WELL: MW-I I DRILLING METHOD: CABLE TOOL, 8-INCH CASING DRILLER: HOKKAIDO DRILLING AND DEVELOPEMENT CO, GRAHAM, WA INSPECTOR: J. NINTEMAN / SEA SAMPLING METHOD: EXAMINATION OF BAILED CUTTINGS RECORD I WELL CONSTRUCTION DRAWING I DETAILS I I Concrete Peter box with lid 8' steel casing with locking cap (See Generalized Well Construction diagram for detail) Cement/bentonite seal +-- 2 - in. SCH 40 PVC casing. Flush threaded. I I I +--Bentonite Pellets I I t—Fine sand I Centering guide I I I f—Sand pack (Monterey- Aqua II8) 1 +--Machine slotted SCH 40 PVC screen 1 (22 slot size) i I I I I Centering guide I )— Naturai formation I— Bottom sump E- End cap FIGURE 7 MW-11 WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM 11 G sg 'T Earl Clymer, Mayor April 14, 1993 Mann -Ling Thibert, Project Manager Metro 821 Second Avenue - MS-1 17 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUCKLINE RELOCATION - PHASE II ENGINEERING REPORT Dear Mann -Ling: The City Wastewater and Transportation staff have reviewed the subject engineering report. Attached you will find our comments that we wish to have incorporated into the document. Upon completing these revisions, we would like to review this document one more time prior to its approval. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277-6212. ,,k-,nnsie-nsen ater Utility Supervisor C:DOCS:93-369:DMC:ps CC: Rod Schindler Attachment 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 TEIIS PAPER CONTAINS 50% RECYCLLD MATFRIAL. 10% POST CONSI:MF:R I CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION II ENGINEERING REPORT RECEIVED D ARMS NO. A65021 - TASK NO. Y75 APR - 9 1993 SCOPE OF WORK I Trans�dios� z This project will reroute a portion of the existing 42-inch Cedar River pipeline, replacing concrete pipe with poly- L-iagV-w-r- ped ductile iron pipe. The project is located ^� t.JrTwAk the City of Renton in the vicinity of the Interstate 405/State Route 169 Interchange (see map 1). The new pipeline will be approximately 5000 feet long and it will be routed to provide a minimum clearance of 200 feet around City of Renton water production wells Nos. 1,2 and 3. BACKGROUND] Originally constructed in the 19 0's, these three wells were rebuilt in 1988 and now produce 5% of the City of Renton's water supply. They are located in the Zone 1 Aquifer Protection Area (see map 2). Metro's 42-inch Cedar River Trunk line was constructed in 1964 using gasket reinforced concrete pipe. It provides sanitary sewer service to the City of Renton, r-9$' and the Cedar Hills Landfill site. There has been growing concern since the 70's, over the vulnerability of the sewer pipe joints to seismic events. The pipeline'•passes very close to the water production wells; within 20 feet in one instance. Well monitoring tests show no sign of contamination from the pipeline as yet, but the nearness of the sewer provides no interception capability or warning in the event of pipeline rupture. The rerouted pipeline would permit the City to monitor ground water and �ake effective, timely action to prevent sewage from entering .ityf water supply The rerouted pipeline project was planned in three phases, with the first phase completed in 1991; Metro replaced a portion of the existing Cedar River Trunk line which lies beneath the I-405 "S-Curves". The second phase of the pipeline project will start west of I-405, in the North Rento neighborhood. There are five alternative routes to choo this phase. The recommended route is North Third reet. The pipeline will begin at the intersection of Factor Avenue North and North Third Street, continuing along North 4hird Street westerly to the intersection of Burnett Avenue North where the pipe will be connected to the existing eastside interceptor. or- rgA66 ► /�O r t? NC B The third phase of the project will begin at the existing Metro manhole R10-11 of a 42-inch sewer and will continue along the Maple Valley highway, north westerly to connect with the phase two project pipeline at Factory Avenue North. When Phase III is completed, Metro's flows will be transferred to the new line from the existing e. The City \ of Renton will continue to use the old line. Per memo of agreement dated November 16, 1992, the phase II pipe design and environmental review will be completed in 1993 and construction will take place in 1994. The phase III project �- will begin in 1996, after the Washington State Department ofp Transportation, I-405 interchange construction is completed. ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT The Cedar River Trunk Relocation Phase II will begin at the Metro sewer manhole R10-11 (see map), and follow along Maple `r Valley highway (SR 169) for 920 feet, turn to the northwest, bore under SR 169, I-405 and the Pacific Northern railroad; then continue westerly, to the intersection of North Brook Street and Factory Avenue north, where the pipeline connects with one of several North Renton neighborhood reroute alternatives. Alternative routes are briefly described below and may be traced on the route map at the end of this report. A. BRONSON WAY ROUTE af� Parallel Maple Valley. to Bronson Way or route south from Brooks to Bronson, then along Bronson to N First Street, reconnecting to the existing Cedar River Trunk. B NORTH SECOND STREET -r�if-` . west From Brooks, continue along N. 2nd Street, reconnecting to the Cedar River Avenue. at Wells Avenue. ,,Trunk C NORTH THIRD STREET oo* fD D4� From Brooks, continue west along N. 3rd Street, then connect to the existing Eastside Interceptor at Burnett Avenue North. D . NORTH FOURTH STREET north 4to From Brooks, -ze N. 4th street, then west along 4th to the existing Eastside Interceptor. 2 I,� E. NORTH FIFTH STREET �;� ��v /WO, b� n From Brooks, � v-e-nnorth to N. 4th stre t en west along 4th to Garden avenue, then north and/west along N. Fifth to the existing Eastside Interceptor. F. UTILIDOR Parallel the existing pipeline with a "pipe -in -a -pipe" to achieve the desired containment in the event of a rupture. The utilidor would run from Manhole R10-11 at Maple Valley Hwy, to the intersection of N. 1st Street and Wells Avenue. EVALUATION CRITERIA The following evaluation criteria Sze re developed jointly by3fo City of Renton and Metro staff. No attempt was made to rank or weight the importance of each criteria. A table is presented which assigns a value for each route, relative to the remaining alternatives; order of preference is from 1 (high) to 5 (low), with the lowest totals electing the preferred alternatives. auifer Protection Is a measure of the separation between the new route and existing water wells for monitoring/intercept purposes, an disruption of the aquifer during construction (as evaluated by the City of Renton). Community Enhancement The opportunity to combine restoration with improved appearance, or services. Landscaping, Renton's "livable streets" program, and quality of access are included in this criteria. Renton Utiility_and Tranan9rtation Project Coordination Coordination of projects limits rework and minimizes community disruption. Certain coincident benefits are achieved through mutual restoration. Some routes will enable Renton and Metro to improve service and life expectancy of existing sewers. Cost �� A prelimin ry cost estimate has been developed for each of the alt rnatives ( see attached), based on the 42- inch poly ductile iron pipe. In addition to labor and materials, costs include mobilization, demobilization, contingency, sales tax, engineering, and administrative costs. 3 Phvsical Limitation Considers the available hydraulic profile and utility conflicts or relocation required to build the route. Construction Impacts Traffic impacts, right-of-way conflicts, and vibration impacts to relatively old neighborhood homes are included in this criteria. Comnarison of Alternatives Bronson N.2nd N.3rd N.4th N.Sth Utilidor Aquifer Protection 4 3 2 1 1 5 Community Enhancement 4 3 1 2 3 4 Coordination w/ Renton 4 3 1 1 3 5 Lifetime Cost 1 2 3 4 5 3 Physical Limitations 4 3 1 2 3 3 Construction Impacts 6 5 3 4 2 1 Totals -213-Mi 19 11 14 17 21 F A DISCUSSION The preferred alternative is N. 3rd Street, which balances cost with benefits to the City of Renton, minimizes community disruption, and improves both Metro's and Renton's sewer condition and capacity in the Renton service area. Metro's portion of the work is estimated to be $3,044,048 as shown on the attached estimate sheet. This figure assumes certain benefits for combined restoration and reasonable permit fees. As the design develops, there will be opportunities to refine the numbers before the 1994 budget process. This recommendation is based on the North 3rd, 4th and 5th Street alternatives which were evaluated as preferred routes by the City of Renton a*�du&focused jets- efforts primarily on Aquifer protection RECOMMENDATION We recommend erouting the pipeline along North 3rd Street (Alternativ C). This pipe alignment will minimize community disruption while maximizing coincident -'benefits to the City Z. of Renton. m� ��,.Y construction of the sewer trunk line, the City,/ will complete necessary road -way improvements to allow downgrading of North Third from a one-way arterial to a two- way local neighborhood street-.- Before North Third S-treet is changed to a two-way street, it will be necessary to make signal modifications along North Third and construct other improvements,,.such as the widening of North Fourth Street. An extra unused lane along the south side of Third Street, in between the intersections of Factory Avenue North to Wells Avenue „rovide* a better working zone for construction crews ITT and less interruption to street traffic than the other alternatives. On September 29, 1992, Metro and the City of Renton held a public meeting to present alternative routes for relocating the existing Cedar River Trunk. The engineers discussed the criteria they are using to evaluate each route. At the end of the two hour session, the Third Street alternative received substantial community support. PROJECT SCHEDULE This Engineering Report will be circulated for staff review and comments within Metro and Renton. The final report will be completed after comments are received. Metro will coordinate project schedules and scope definition with Renton as the process proceeds. The preliminary project schedule is attached. r-L--„W ,. , V"t��� 5 The SEPA document will be DNS. SEPA review will be for the entire project. The review period will be 45 days from issuance of draft to final, which includes the writing, review, production, notification, issuance, and final document. Permits and easements will be acquired from the City of Renton, WSDOT, Burlington Northern, and other private owners. The longest lead item is expected to be the acquiring of the easement from the private property owner just west of I-405. To avoid interference with WSDOT's South Renton Sunset HOV Project, phase II of the project will start in the North Renton Neighborhood in 1994. The remaining pipe construction will begin after WSDOT completes the HOV lane construction. The phase II pipeline construction is estimated to take ,�p�Aw approximately four months to complete. The City's -gida Sewer Improvement wo,iTectd will follow Metro's pipeline construction f way. The ty estimates it will take approximately six months to complete their work. The City of Renton Au ggested to combine the pipeline reroute project and the City's Street Improvement project in one contract, a further discussion will be conducted on this issue. I :!; mETRo Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684-2100 March 31,1993 Mr. Dave Christensen Wastewater Utility Engineer Utility Systems Division Public Works Department Municipal Building 200-Mill Ave. So. Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Cedar River Trunk Relocation Phase II Engineering Report Dear Dave; 90451 L38 V� AQR SON � �F 'Dept. �r��reec Attached is an updated engineering report for you to review. The purpose of this report is for evaluating the pipeline relocation alternatives. The criteria used to rank the alternatives were generated from discussions between the City of Renton, Metro, and the Renton resident community. The recommended pipeline reroute alternative is the North Third Street alignment. If you concur with this report, please sign both original letters in the space provided below and return one copy to me for our records. We look forward to receiving your response and review comments by April 15, 1993. Your comments will be carefully looked at and incorporated into the report. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Mann-Ling7hibert,P.E. Project Manager MLT / s a ; mkJkty David Christensen Date Wastewater Utility Engineer Utility Systems Division CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION - ROUTE COST COMPARISONS ITEM DESCRIPTION BRONSON SECS THIRD FOURTH FIFTH UTILIDOR (DURATION) 135 150 180 240 240 240 (LENGTH) 4185 4525 4955 5625 6200 3360 GENERALCONDMNS 84000 70000 84000 105000 105000 105000 SHORING PROVISIONS 184950 208750 238850 285750 326000 207000 'AS -BUILT PROVISIONS 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 Excavation 31468 34629 38626 44855 54216 29381 Haul Unsuitable 17552 19315 21544 25019 30240 16389 Imported Backfill 31593 34767 38780 45033 54432 30041 Native Backfill 107819 118648 132344 153685 185760 100670 Grading 22500 22500 22500 22500 22500 22500 Seed 7987.5 7987.5 7987.5 7987.5 7987.5 7987.5 Planting 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 50000 Subgrade Prep 3929 4581 5405 6689 6210 3366 Crushed Base 17425 20315 23970 29665 27540 14927 Pavement 24258 28282 33370 41298 38340 20780 Utility Relocations 0 0 0 0 0 425000 Pipeline (except cased pipe) 382505 420925 469515 545225 610200 379680 Dewatering 109674 120690 134622 156330 174960 Manholes 75000 80000 90000 95000 10000 50000 Jacking/Casing 548000 548000 548000 548000 730400 412500 Jacking/Receiving Pits 202500 202500 202500 202500 202500 0 Clean & Grout Abandoned Lin 67340 90856 110630 110630 110630 89787 Bid Total: $1 ,973,501 $2,087,744 $2,257,645 $2,480,167 $2,751,916 $1 ,970,008 Contingency @ 10% �197,350 $208,774 $225,764 $248,017 $275,192 $197,001 Tax @ 8.2% $178,010 $188,314 $203,640 $223,711 $248,223 $177,695 Permits/Easements $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $105,000 Administration/Inspection $284,000 $289,000 $312,000 $346,000 $346,000 $446;000 Estimated Lifetime Cost $2,677,860 1 $2,818,833 1 $3,044,048 1 S3,342,894 1 $3,666,330 $2,895,703 Alternatives for relocating the Cedar River trunk sewer line. Heavy black line shows present location and dashed lines show five other alternative routes for the pipeline. MAP 3 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 9SI04-1598 DATE SENT: TRANSMITTED TO: FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET P7 vc- eP)eIS7"�S6�7J/el Ti TRANSMITTED FROM: 1441) A) U- N y -rN 1,6 CW 7 (Name) (Mail Stop) L 8 '1' - 4 7 SSA (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: (Including Cover Sheet) '2�.. (206) 684-1710 FOR INTERNAL STAFF USE ONLY: PROJECT: ARMS/TASK NO.: SUBJECT: NOTES: VR'V� S'c�p� ate- 2/T'd OT1.Tb09902 S33IA63S *dOW3 ONi3W 2S:bT E6, 60 abW Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. Ink Consulting Engineers, Planners & Surveyors March 4, 1993 Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E. Engineering Services Division Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle 821 Second Avenue MIS 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 01--? �;z �- Y --2 RECElv;r, MAR 0 5 1993 ENGI,4cERiNG SEFRIVICES SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION RENTON, WA PROPOSAL FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING, SECOND REVISION Dear Ms. Thibert: 265.92 Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. (HDA) is pleased to submit this revised proposal to include the additional survey work the City of Renton wants to incorporate in this project. We have also contacted Mr. Dave Christensen, City of Renton, and reviewed the survey comments he submitted to you earlier this month. Scope of Work I. With reference to the enclosed copy of a portion of Kroll Map pa'-e 328 W, HDA will provide topographic mapping obtained by aerial photogrammetry of that portion of N. 3rd Street between Burnett and Factory Avenues North as outlined in red. As with the prior mapping, the photogrammetry will be subcontracted to WAI. WAI will again use the aerial photography as flown for the original project mapping. June 5, 1991, with an exception being at the beginning of the project corridor at Burnett Ave. N.. Original photography does not provide stereo coverage here, however, WAI has other photography, and more current, that will give the necessary coverage. HDA will provide -a general field edit of the mapping corridor and specific edit (location of valves, water meters, etc. not visible to photogrammetrist) between opposite sidewalk lines. In addition, HDA will enhance the aerial topographic mapping with the following: 1. Address of houses and buildings shown along the mapping corridor. 2. Spot elevations as field surveyed at all street and alley intersections. 3. Avenue and street right-of-way lines as determined from existing street monumentation. 320 .Second Avenue South, Kirkland, Washington 98033-6687 • Phone: (206) 822-2525 • Fax: (206) 822-8758 212'd OT2Tb09902 S30L'�.a3S '�DW3 Odi3W 2S:t7T E6, 60 61dW :; r1'tETRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684-2100 March 31,1993 90451 L38 Mr. Dave Christensen Wastewater Utility Engineer Utility Systems Division Public Works Department Municipal Building 200-Mill Ave. So. Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Cedar River Trunk Relocation Phase II Engineering Report Dear Dave; Attached is an updated engineering report for you to review. The purpose of this report is for evaluating the pipeline relocation alternatives. The criteria used to rank the alternatives were generated from discussions between the City of Renton, Metro, and the Renton resident community. The recommended pipeline reroute alternative is the North Third Street alignment. If you concur with this report, please sign both original letters in the space provided below and return one copy to me for our records. We look forward to receiving your response and review comments by April 15, 1993. Your comments will be carefully looked at and incorporated into the report. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, 7-6 4��t- Mann-Lfn hibert,P.E. Project Manager MLT/sa;mk JekV David Christensen Date Wastewater Utility Engineer Utility Systems Division flv ' M5,ET ZZ ... - y AIJ .: ........ ., _ " Q � .k 3 � s f a y _ pK' •pas > `, �,- �J i j t .,R ' %t. ;'' 75 / ' Kw el O / ,l Min r t _ H: I t. ,4 O Y I 7 < ...... 49 b 73 Or T. : , i i f , 1' { i " :r .. �.H c _.....M ..e JI , : f , • ........ ...... ,,,p \•\\ �" ;.. : ar? , : .: -. , ...... so-? �x••'i' -F, "'�� Et? FV n • 1 \, `✓ 1 awr \ ,' Cl/] ' : j � s r........... � \ "� r•;.: � ... •fir /,j� � . 9'a 7 ............. ;.............,... F.•,[t�z " .\.,:;�\: � � ` .x ..fin r _ F..... : , �!$• ,$'i;'7 ../ `j >... , r. • : . < J ......................v..mw .�. :.......... ..M110 ♦ v : s 1 ¢ j� a } ``.�v/ ✓ f �'►hi ' „,,���0 �++,� as j _ice-44! ' r v a pf still fill f / ....... , 77 Jr , Oci C - .. .n .. .. .. Cottonwo+c . Lift Station i� O lD V m �.0 lD i9 0i L0 Ld C� H Ld co 0 Z W O O' H t,J I= c-n to m iJ1 T Mann' Engin Muni 821 S Seattl SUB] Dear Hortd the ad conm submI �20 Second +r �48I QXMETR0 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE SENT: 3/4! 93 TRANSMITTED TO: PAV eAle f T'C-AJ t e.v ICI I TRANSMITTED FROM: 2/J "-jAJ _ 1-1 A) 67 -7W /dE,eT (Name) (Mail Stop) 54 (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER:(206) 684-1710 - NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: / _ (Including Cover Sheet) FOR INTERNAL STAFF USE ONLY: PROJECT: ele-r2 Vg2 / kyAI;L LCe-'*7-l��% ARMS/TASK NO.: SUBJECT: i i i 1 NOTES: { l A%4C ��0 ,�CO� D� F `l L S�,�vt S'�f/ED�GE Srg�T 1�/slY3 - ^V12�X. 4/�•1r3 z� G,.o A4,Ot e- i' dr SJ w 0 CY w m trl tri m 0 Q 7- Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle March 4, 1993 Page 2 4. Property lines, locations plotted per current Assessor's maps. 5. Underground utilities and inverts, where applicable, of trunk lines. Side services will not be shown. Topo?raphic mapping will be prepared in AutoCAD, Version 11, at a scale of V =50' with a two (2) foot contour interval. The horizontal and vertical reference datums shall coincide with the original mapping which were the Washington Coordinate System, North Zone (NAD 27) and National Geodetic Vertical Datum, 1929. AutoCAD mapping will be to Metro standard layering and symbology specifications in a manuscript format. Note: This work scope is identical to that as submitted in HDA's original proposal of November 19, 1992 including the two (2) foot mapping contour interval which was changed from two (2) feet to one (1) foot in our revised proposal of January 18, 1993. II. This item in the original proposal had WAI, providing a translation of their 1991 project mapping lying easterly of Factory Avenue North into digital disk format, AutO CAD, Version 11. It did not however, include the field edit and other enhancements HDA added to the mapping prior to final submittal. This item is now revised to include final edit and enhancements into the digital disk format. III. New item (1-18-93) HDA will cross section North 3rd Street from Burnett Avenue North to Factory Avenue North. Maximum interval between sections shall be fifty (50) feet. At street intersections, sections will parallel the intersecting street and consist of a section along the back of walk, curb line and centerline. Intersecting street sections will extend fifty (50) feet each side of North 3rd Street. Alleys and driveways intersecting North 3rd Street will also be sectioned along their approximate centerlines for a maximum distance of fifty (50) feet. Sections taken between the intersecting alleys and streets will extend twelve (12) feet beyond the road margins of North 3rd Street or to the existing structure, whichever is the lesser. Cross section data will be translated to an ASCII format with key points further identified with their centerline stationing as it occurs along North 3rd Street. Street intersections will be noted with their station on the map described under Item I. IN. New item (3-3-93). HDA will re -scale the V=50' mapping to 1"=20'. Mapping will still be in a manuscript format on digital disk as described above. The basic task in preparing the item involves the re -scaling of text and symbols to coincide with the 1 " = 20' scale. H,rirron Oennis & Associates, lne. • Consulting Engineers, Planners. & 5urrevors • Kirkland, Mishirr,2111,t N m CL m v m �n tD m 0i r-n LJ w to wY c� z w 0 i LLI z Q t�n rJti m LE rs Mann -Ling Thibcrt, P,E. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle March 4, 1993 Page 3 Scbgdule of Fees HDA will provide the preceding services for a fee accumulated on a time/true labor rate compensation basis not to exceed the grand total of the following estimates of which the labor rates are approximated. ITEM I - MAPPING Survey Manager 28 HRS. ® 527.00/11R. $756.00 Sr. Party Chief 32 HRS. ® S19.25/HR. 616.00 Instrumentperson 32 HAS. Q $11.50/HR. 368.00 Computer/CAD Drafter 44 HRS. (9) 516.00/HR. '704.00 Subtotal (Direct Labor) $2,444.00 Labor, G & A Overheads 133.2% x $2,444.00 3,251.41 Subtotal $5,699.41 Profit fig) 10% x $5,699.41 569.94 Subtotal $6,269.35 Walker & Associates, Inc. 2,670.W Materials & Reproductions 76.45 SUBTOTAL $9,015.80 ITEM n - ORIGINAL. MAPPING TRANSLATION & ENHANCEMENT Survey Manager 6 HRS 0 S27.00/HR S 162.00 CAD Drafter 16 HRS @ S 16.00/HR 256.00 Subtotal 0)irect Labor) $ 418.00 Labor, G&A Overheads 133.2 x $418,00 556,78 Subtotal — S 974.78 Profit ® 10% x $974.78 97.48 Subtotal $ 1,072.26 Walker & Associates, Inc. 630.00 Reproductions 21.55 SUBTOTAL S 1,728.31 Horn•n Dennis & Associates, Inc. • Consulting Engineers, Planners. & Surveyors • Kirkland. 11'oshin,ion a 6� c� co w Q N fo t,1 r•_} H w co U z w t— w z l7l s th CE z Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle March 4, 1993 Page 4 ITFAM III - CROSS SECTIONS Survey Manager 4 HRS @ $27.00/HR $ 108.00 Sr. Party Chief 16 HRS @ $19.25/HR 308.00 instrumentperson 16 HRS 0 $11.50/HR 184.00 Computer 8 HRS @ $16.00/HR S 128.00 Subtotal (Direct Labor) S 728.00 Labor, G & A Overheads 133.2% x $728.00 969.70 Subtotal $ 1,697.70 Profit @ 10% x $1,697.70 169.77 Subtotal 1,867.47 Materials & Reproductions 7 7 SUBTOTAL. S 1,895.22 ITEM IV MAP RE -SCALE Survey Manager 2 Hrs. a $27.00/Hr. $54.00 CAD Drafter 16 Hrs. @ $16.00/Hr. 256.00 Subtotal (Direct Labor) $310.00 Labor, G & A Overheads 133.2 % x $310.00 41_ 2.92 Subtotal 722.92 Profit 0 10% x $722.92 72.29 Materials & Reproductions 49.7 SUBTOTAL S845.00 GRAND TOTAL - NOT TO EXCFED FEE S13 11484.83 li ir.- i Dennis & .Associates, Inc. • Consulting Engineers. Planners. & Surveyors • Kirkland, Washington Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle March 4, 1993 Page 5 LL Time 5chedule i Product Delivery Project Mapping as defined within the scope of services herein will be completed and delivered to client within forty five (45) calendar days from notice to proceed. Product delivery shall consist of one set of AutoCAD, Version II (12 may be substituted) drawing files on disk of WAI's mapping with HDA's field edit and enhancement additions in manuscript format for each of maps described under Items I, II and IV. Item III delivery shall consist of the ASCII disk and one printout of same. If you require any clarifications don't hesitate to call. Until further word we remain at your service. Sincerely, m HORTON DENNIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. OD v kB Donald B. Bu7PLSW Survey Manag r� W U hl LZ' W CO 7 W 0 W e--I 0) Q1 ry Hvrrnn Dennis & Associales, Inc. • Consrelting Engineers. Planners, & Survevors • Kirkland, Washin,ron B28 VV � �--.• Ze5.9z- Nov, lay 199z - ENTC N WXz n-2_'3-5�___l =� ._",s ._.�.._._._._,—_(µ 13.�.:0.-`_._. /.�..�.._._.�.. —•—'r--plRavC.4 b� A � iI/,a�I' 056 i�18W'• © W� 6 11 ' 3 • : . ' t� 14 p 161 90. .�,.7 /.� P1 aL p u •a - 5 rol�'� S. ') '`'`; — is a� y <, ® I f tt 2T ,• Cj1 �j;' l� 6fl m 6 2° a . N e z1 �_ - MARIO N ST. .1 M4FION :.+t 1 C _ Qp , y . 2 t p s ® I w IA S St, ': ! ?� :L7L e 6 •� [sc> 3 11 ® Z . 9 as ss �;���' r i '< %g! J:. :•::::; /ice r �7r O v: f 2{ 1, SI r.?". u S © 4 18 tri -.7D 2S ® 1@ wi j 7r ,�� i / ,J Xo'• •.° .r - T�•^ Si v� 'ill. �d DQ' Nis, Ior•Gttt ] scQ. t3 Z° 3IIV ill '1 29 , Q m2S x; ^ it _-1 n21 -�'=+1`��U�.. %x ;�. { � R alR :IS by ` Q ijL4 P So OD l' ! ( ey d • 9 ,- �� ifs d �Q • �I 91 E E a . p 22 sm p 22. ":' lot2 .�: =•IQ 6 oz>• a®. y pz3. G.E�I• �z. J�' I C. g 5 ® 3 p. 14 Q 24 3. IS N;6a isi�u" ) 6�516 Q 3 16 I too W '.. io. < ♦� 1r ♦ o0.14=xA♦• Gol�lyDo{� - t NWA Lr` �.`� .S� 7 6 rn p 12 13 e I I ' ] ) -a nl �., F.f: ' 1 ill; GROV1►iUT a _ r W < er ,` Z S , '12 . .I < !1 0 4 t. 4� /�/ % \P L1M -� / ♦\\� .y eti ,�I _s�. oIS low II - 3_ -i I)F •� , �., ;`;, .\ ar i..IS 9 a 4 � I. �� • IS 1 � � 1, j i{,�. � • �� : p \\� . <\. . © � �—__ s _ + '• - •� a ���'` �►- . or `1 \1 `\� ` ♦ma's 5 ®g-5----------- + � s', \� \\ rr J.4FlW y WAY nl •!••r 'y, '•'• �V �✓x CIN cn 5 I� S > • Q 0� Qo `p �. E +..1y Q— ' �. a% \.y �\ \ \.\ , J��♦,•. A Z "a { li9 .S '; '�• /��J -- _ l •/f /. • / ' � %% C .ice—_;,�� •° ,��..—a• __ 77 r .:(i,\�\\ •�+. d! d •6 -f4 Q �` /� / ..1•' F�� f� < : ::• /' \ I� CFAiaES Sa. as •� 0 IYI � [m 1 1L Earl Clymer, Mayor March 4, 1993 Mann -Ling Thibert Metro 821 Second Avenue South - M/S 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT SHARING COSTS FOR SURVEY WORK Dear Mann -Ling: The City has reviewed your letter of February 8, 1993 as well as contacted Horton Dennis and Associates for additional information. Based upon this information the City agrees to pay for the following: 50 foot internal cross sectioning: $1,898.00 Creation of 20 scale maps from Metro 50 scale maps: $845.00 Subtotal: $2,743.00 10% consultant profit $274.30 City of Renton Total: $3,017.30 We have re-evaluated our request to change the contour interval from 2 ft to 1 ft and have determined that 2 ft. would be sufficient, and therefore, would not increase that cost. I would like to thank Metro for including these items of work within your contract with HDA and look forward to working through the design elements for this project. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (206) Wastewater Utility Supervisor C:DOCS:93-234:DMC:ps 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS PAPER CONTAINS 50% RECYCLED MATERIAL, 10% POST CONSUMER March 3, 1993 Mann -Ling Thibert Metro 821 Second Avenue South - M/S 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT SHARING COSTS FOR SURVEY WORK Dear Mann -Ling: CONCUR ENCE DATE —L NAME I The City has reviewed your letter of February 8, 1993 as well as contacted Horton Dennis and Associates for additional information. Based upon this information the City agrees to pay for the following: 50 foot internal cross sectioning: $1,898.00 Creation of 20 scale maps from Metro 50 scale maps: $845.00 Subtotal: $2,743.00 10% consultant profit $274.30 City of Renton Total: $3,017.30 We have re-evaluated our request to charge the contour interval from 2 ft to 1 ft and have determined that 2 ft. would be sufficient, and therefore, would not increase that cost. I would like to thank Metro for including these items of work within your contract with HDA and look forward to working through the design elements for this project. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (206) 277-6212. Sincerely, David M. Christensen Wastewater Utility Supervisor C: DOCS:93-234:DMC:ps I t wjlr METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684-2100 February 18,1993 Dave Christensen City of Renton 200 - Mill Ave. S. Renton, Washington 98055 MIT�� L38 90390 t� LJ FEB 19 1993 CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept. SUBJECT: Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project Sharina costs for the additional survey work This is a follow up to our telephone conversation on February 16, 1993 regarding the above subject. I have reviewed the consultant Horton Dennis & Associates' survey proposal. The total cost that the City of Renton will be responsible for is $2511. This cost was based on the additional scope of work requested by the City earlier which includes: Additional fee for change contour intervals - $385 50 feet interval cross sections - $1898 10% consultant's profit - $228 Please send me a Memo and let me know if you concur with me; Thanks you. Sincerely, Mann -Line hibert, P.E. MLT/sa;mk,A,. cc: R. Browne - 117 a.l ► ?J 93 - METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET LL DATE SENT: Z /'a /13 TRANSMITTED TO: I/ e - l7AV c CK Q/STt x g'�✓ L / r `/ O F f' it/ To A/ TRANSMITTED FROM: MAC' AJ (Name) (Mail Stop) .- 68 4 - G 785 (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: (206) 684-1710 NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: (Including Cover sheet) FOR INTERNAL STAFF USE ONLY: PROJECT: _eC04k. t w,!ck: %kU.jK KC Locfl j /J.�i ARMS/TASK NO.: SUBJECT: rr a A --rug /, �/ _ 5c o�p r o NOTES: v EL m v OD W k'D m N (D w �J H w LO Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers, Planners & Surveyors RECEIVED JAN 2 0 1993 ENGINEERING SERVICES irilt�i it►g'}4i�ert, P.E. Engineering Services Division Municipality of Maopolitan Seattle 821 Second Avenue M/S 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 January 18, 1993 SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION RENTION, WA REVISED PROPOSAL FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING Dear Ms. Thibert: 4915610 Y-}-s Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. (RDA) is pleased to submit this revised proposal to include the additional survey work the City of Renton wants to incorporate in this project. We have also contacted Mr. Dave Christensen, City of Renton, and reviewed the survey comments he submitted to you earlier this month. Scope of Work 1. With reference to the enclosed copy of a portion of Kroll Map page 328 W, HDA will provide topographic mapping obtained by aerial photogrammetry of that portion of N. 3rd Street between Burnett and Factory Avenues North as outlined in red. As with the prior mapping, the photogrammetry will be subcontracted to WAL WA1 will again use the aerial photography as flown for the original project mapping, June 5, 1991, with an exception being at the beginning of the project corridor at Burnett Ave. N.. Original photography does not provide stereo coverage here, however, WAI has other photography, and more current, that will give the necessary coverage. HDA will provide a general field edit of the mapping corridor and specific edit (location of valves, water meters, etc. not visible to photogrammetrist) between opposite sidewalk lines. In addition, HDA will enhance the aerial topographic mapping with the following: 1. Address of houses and buildings shown along the mapping condor. 2. Spot elevations as Feld surveyed at all street and alley intersections. 320 Second Avenue South, Kirkland, Washington 98033-6687 • Phone; (206) 822-2525 • Fax: (206) 822-8758 v rA W w CO w U H W U7 Ll 0 t— LL) Ln M CO 0) (U as LEI L� Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle January 18, 1993 Page 2 Avenue and street right-of-way lines as determined from existing street monumentation. 4. Property lines, locations plotted per current Assessors maps. Underground utilities and inverts, where applicable, of trunk lines. Side services will not be shown. Topographic mapping will be prepared in AutoCAD, Version 11, at a scale of 1"=50' with a one (1) foot contour interval. The horizontal and vertical reference datums shall coincide with the original mapping which were the Washington Coordinate System, North Zone (NAD 27) and National Geodetic Vertical Datum, 1929. AutoCAD mapping will be to Metro standard layering and symbology specifications in a manuscript format. Note: This work scopes item is identical to that as submitted in RDA's original proposal of November 19, 1992 with the exception of mapping contour interval which has been changed fro two 2 feet to one 1 foot. ' O O / c'cuiccR irtaA�wc Corr Z' „ d 'Yoga..` H. This item in the original proposal had WAI providing a translation of their 1991 project mapping lying easterly of Factory Avenue North into digital disk format, AutoCAD, Version I1. It did not however, include the field edit and other enhancements, HDA added to the mapping prior to final submittal. This item is now revised to include final edit and enhancements into the digital disk format. Esrl,",grr,- v 693• FiNn L rsl'A' firs i tt III. New item. HDA will cross section North 3rd Street from Burnett Avenue North to Facory Avenue North. Maximum interval between sections shall be fifty (50) feet. At street intersections, sections will parallel the intersecting street and consist of a section along the back of walk, curb line and centerline_ intersecting street sections will extend fifty (50) feet each side of North 3rd Street. Alleys and driveways intersecting North 3rd Street will also be sectioned along their approximate centerlines for a maximum distance of fifty (50) feet. Sections taken between the intersecting alleys and streets will extend twelve (12) feet beyond the road margins of North 3rd Street or to the existing structure, whichever is the lesser. d /g fS Cross section data will be translated to an ASCII format with key points further identified with their centerline stationing as it occurs along Notch 3rd Street. Street intersections will be noted with their station on the map described under item I. Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. • Consulting Engineers, Planners, & surveyors • Kirkland, Washington Mann -Ling ThibcM P.E. w Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle January 18, 1993 Page 3 Schedule of Fees HDA will provide the preceding services for a fee accumulated on a time/true labor rate compensation basis not to exceed the grand total of the following estimates of which the labor rates are approximated. ITEM I - MAPPING Survey Manager 24 HRS. @ $27.00/1IR. $648.00 Sr. Party Chief 32 HRS. @ $19.25&M. 616.00 Instrumentperson 32 HRS. @ $11.50MR. 368.00 Computer/CAD Drafler 44 HRS. @ $16.00/I1R. 704.00 Subtotal (Direct Labor) $2,336.00 Labor, G & A Overheads 133.2% x S2,336.00 3,1 11.55 W �.D Subtotal _ $5,447.55 w Walker & Associates. Inc. N00 ,447.55 Materials & Reproductions 76.45 co w Subtotal $8,550.00 3 Profit @ 10% x $8,550.00 855.00 w SUBTOTAL = $ 9,405.00 rr W ITEM 11 - ORIGINAL MAPPING TRANSLATION & ENHANCEMENT Sw-vey Manager 4 HRS @ $27.00/HR S 108.00 w CAD Drafler 16 HRS @ $16.00/HR 256.00 i -- — Subtotal (Direct Labor) $ 384.85 64,064.0 0 ['1 Labor, G&A Overheads 133.2 x $364.00 4 (Yl Subtotal $ 848.45 Walker & Assmiates, Inc. 630.00 Reproductions 21.55 pq Subtotal S 1,500.00 Profit @ 10% x $1,500.00 150.00 SUBTOTAL = $ 1,650.00 Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers, Planners, & Surveyors Kirkland, Washington Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E klu Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle ti � January 18. 1993 Page 4 Z Tf co m W CO W U H r1 Ld co 7- w 0 H w i uw irl m s ca w L, ITEM III - CROSS SECTIONS Survey Manager Sr. Party Chief Instrumentperson Computer Subtotal (Direct Labor) Labor, G & A Overheads 133.2% x $728.00 Materials & Reproductions Subtotal Profit @ 10% x $1,725.45 4 HRS @ $27.00/HR $ 108.00 16 HRS @ S 19.25/HR 308.00 16 HRS @ $1 I.50/H.R 184.00 8 HRS @ S 16.001HR 128.00 $ 728.00 969.70 27.75 S 1,725.45 172.55 SUBTOTAL = $ 1,898.0 GRAND TOTAL - NOT TO EXCEED FEE $12,953.00 Time Schedule / Product Deliver Project Mapping as defined within the scope of services herein will he completed and delivered to client within forty five (45) calendar days from notice to proceed. Product delivery shall consist of one set of AutoCAD, Version 11(12 may be substituted) drawing files on disk of WAI's mapping with HDA's field edit and enhancement additions in manuscript format for each of maps described under Items I and U. Item Ill delivery shall consist of the ASCII disk and one printout of same. If you require any clarifications don't hesitate to call. Until further word we remain at your service. Sincerely, HORTON DENNIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Donald B. Burns, PLS Survey Manager Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. • Consulting Engineers, Planners, & Surveyors • Kirkland, Washington P1aV. Iti Piz- R E N T6 N W yz 17 -23 - 5 �_I � 1 �3 ~ �__ _J L_ J L� 7 ►. ids 1113 Jy v r Emu 6 rM ma IonON-�Em zu- - MY I IBM _ ul ti r y ;:. cc I -°; t l s 7c i t i i .ti zm F,'O lgT. d N m, / r _ �, Tli � : � [� 9 J: 125. � �:v. �'c1 k.,:� I . I: ��• � N MARN S IS ,u q tb(✓ITi, 13Id! . 111 4 i9 // / tFr 129601 _ _ L , '`• ��C�i®I� 1, .-'/J •Y• PrQ �'i!' ---y-,� •arc � - 1 /��: �..;�,y .' �,•-. I -- _- 9 - .. N6W CORM v.p D� --T •- p, � / rT':y,.. �r �, /'•.';1 '.. • - ---- Q •J d ell S 'b7 !• i m'��_G v 3. v 6� 815 it Q16 11";+• r 7 _ �Q S UL It 391 .m' le r. , '�� t r ? ®p 7 `U7 �, Se' rc� N Np all ®2 6 ®`•. C�iJ �w i H r '�: Lot2,M " ; � � •p22 sp .� p 72. 6 � 021 40. � Qn. IC.E. ZW AC"` i . a 5 ® 1 3 0,' J t24 3ul. .�Cjam 9 I Q .-�'NJ 3 16 tJ Q�]S 3 -16 ©. ` ' •3 -4'.. S I6 a I. Q /�34*.:'e�, j � `.��� r 7'� 5e .41 LEM s is 2@ �� s le ,IJ ,k. yy ,•s . O p ' II 74 is ,r2X& 7 1 �:.: r, i •. � t i Op ••TF ,�.••. p — t3 / 1f Z � �\Z o �ti cor:a o t 9 as ., ,1 1 ,3 - :i y / / •� � .:�� �> �.�t — 'o 3 3 f w Is •� •� �'� F:'• ,t�; :,. —� t /•��, iiR0Ul1�U r� � i— ��• .. sp: MW 11.- Ott1 wlLN Iryel `Em\ ` \``v\ i`' r Jlr? ec ,,. ;'IS b w µ -II 3-- i 131 d 1 R `J.;_: oi)'`O AM'* 9 ® ®� j -4 Sr COIAON Owsr , a _ .r,, \,'SJ •:''ate , • a ` ' ` � 7 � M I ' � -.._=� � �' ���srsz; '®'".��� :. .�. v zo s® E]s �: o . 17 e^r \\, ��... � ,, ♦ ' .;; ,t� � I�� CN�R�i'S S�An. CITY OF RENTON Id Earl Clymer, Mayor November 16, 1992 Mr. John Spencer, Director Water Pollution Control Department METRO 821 Second Ave - M/S 82 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT Dear Spencer: Per our telephone conversation of November 10, 1992, 1 have asked my staff to review your request to postpone the construction of the Cedar River Trunkline Relocation until 1994. The conclusion we have made is that your request is acceptable under the following terms and conditions: 11 That pre -design, environmental review, and final design continue on the schedule established for the 1993 construction window. 2) That construction begin no later than the second quarter of 1994 to ensure that the City will not threaten its eligibility for Public Works Trust Fund loans currently being secured for our local sewer replacement project. 3) That coordination efforts with the City's proposed transportation improvements continue to ensure that the timetable for the transportation projects do not slip. 4) That it is understood that construction of the trunkline relocation can be divided into phases. Phase 1 shall be from the connection at the Eastside Interceptor to the easterly right-of-way of Factory Avenue North. Subsequent phases will be established as necessary to meet the scheduling of both the City's Park Department through the Cedar River Park as well as the Washington State Department of Transportation in regards to the 1-405 project. if you cr.ncur It3^:s 1 through 4 shown i E eon, Please 3.g i the 011giiiai and copy W, the space provided and return this original to the City for its records. This document shall serve as a "Letter Agreement" defining the requested revision to schedule by Metro. This letter meets the intent outlined in Sections 7.2.2 and 8.3 of the Memorandum of Agreement entered into by Metro and the City of Renton. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Dave Christensen at (206) 277-6212. Sincerely, Lynn uttmann, Administrator 4ictor, pence Date Water Pollution Control Department C:DOCS:92-927:LAG: DMC: ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman Dave Christensen Rod Schindler 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 — -"'O iETRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle. WA 98104-1398 -4 CL N �f Cis w tD m CU Cn LI C1 . H _ 7 It w co U z L LI O CC F- Ld z I- N Crl N m co W W ,::5 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE S ENT : L / 1 / �" � ! I? �z TRANSMITTED TO: l/C p S 7- c 1 TX OF PEN ro,J TRANSMITTED FROM: 1 A/,J ' " L /V6�f %N 16,g 7- / / 7 (Name) (Mail Stop) �,84 678.5 (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: (Including Cover Sheet) (206) 684-1710 FOR INTERNAL STAFF USE ONLY: PROJECT: CAD �2 I i% � /e 1 k uy K. fgzo C,� 10 ^1 ARMS/TASK NO.: SUBJECT: NOTES: 'YA VC �L P n S l; d !/ 1 i✓ t✓ A ov A v ai 7"1 ate' 9 l� R )E(V2.1,47: i° 181992 Ong erl RENT ON ng kept. 0 Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. � DA RECEIVED (L -Hw N O V 2 3 1S92 Consulting Engineers, Planners th Surveyors DIGINEEANG SERVICcS November 19, 1992 )E bsg Thibert,� P.19. 265.92 'gineering Services Division Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle 821 Second Ave., M/S 117 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION RENTON, WA J PROPOSAL FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING -:r Dear Ms. Thibert: rr� 1; Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. (HDA) was sorry to learn that the N. 2nd street portion of iJ the proposed trunk relocation route mapped by HDA in the summer of 1991 has been declared unsuitable by the City of Renton. We are pleased, however, that we may again offer our Ld services and that of our photogrammetist, Walker and Associates, Inc. (WAI), in providing topographic mapping of your alternate corridor along N. 3rd street. u= w Scope of Work 1. With reference to the enclosed copy of a portion of Kroll Map page 328 W, HDA will `z provide topographic mapping obtained by aerial photogrammetry of that portion of N. w 3rd street between Burnett and Factory Avenues North as outlined in red. As with the prior mapping, the photograrnmetry will be subcontracted to WAI. WAI will again use LE the aerial photography as flown for the original project mapping, June S, 1991, with an w exception being at the beginning of the project corridor at Burnett Ave. N.. Original _ photography does not provide stereo coverage here, however, WAI has other t-! photography, and more current, that will give the necessary coverage. to HDA will provide a general field edit of the mapping corridor and specific edit (location 171 of valves, water meters, etc. not visible to photogrammetrist) between opposite sidewalk IT, lines. In addition, HDA will enhance the aerial topographic mapping with the following: fQ 1. Address of houses and buildings shown along the mapping corridor. it 2. Spot elevations as field surveyed at all street and alley intersections. .120 Second Avenue South, Kirkland, Washington 980JJ-6687 • Phone. (206) 822-2.525 • Fax: (206) 822-8758 Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle November 19, 1992 L- Page 2 m lD �.l tS �v LO w V H LLJ LO Lr� i w r-) [t'_ F— w Q1 fri cv N m ro .-a U w_ ca 3. Avenue and street right-of-way lines as determined from existing street monumentation. 4. Property lines, locations plotted per current Assessor's maps. 5. Underground utilities and inverts, where applicable, of trunk lines. Side services will not be shown. Topographic mapping will be prepared in AutoCAD, Version 11, at a scale of 1" =50' with a 2' contour interval. The horizontal and vertical reference datums shall coincide with the original mapping which were the Washington Coordinate System, North Zone (NAD 27) and National Geodetic Vertical Datum, 1929. AutoCAD mapping will be to Metro standard layering and symbology specifications in a manuscript format. H. As previously discussed, this item will have WAI provide an AutoCAD, Version 11, translation of the original mapping of the project area lying easterly of Factory Ave. N.. HDA will not add their enhancements to this translation. Schedule of Fees: HDA will provide the preceding scope of services for a fee accumulated on a time/true labor rate compensation basis for Item I and lump sum figure for Item 1I. Estimated cost for Item 1, being a not to exceed fee, and lump sum figure for Item Il are as summarized below. Labor rates are approximated. ITEM I - MAPPING Survey Manager Sr. Party Chief Instrumentperson Computer/CAD Drafter Subtotal (Direct Labor) Labor, G & A Overheads Subtotal Walker & Associates, Inc. Materials & Reproductions 24 Hrs. ® $27.00/Hr. 32 His. Q $19.25/Hr. 32 Hr.s ® $11.50/Hr. 44 Hrs. ® $16.00/Hr. 133.2% x $2,336.00 Subtotal Profit ® 10% x $8,200.00 $648.00 616.00 368.00 704.00 $2,336.00 3,111.55 $5,447.55 2,670.00 82.45 $8,200.00 820.00 TOTAL - NOT TO EXCEED FEE $9,020.00 Horwn Dennis & Associates, Inc. • Consulting Isngineers, Planners, & Surveyors • Kirkland, Washington t r4"p 4i c---- �a , l tie e S Ms J UV i --v Mann -Ling Thibert, P.E. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle November 19, 1992 Page 3 ITEM U - ORIGINAL MAPPING TRANSLATION Walker & Associates, Inc. $630.00 HDA Administration Fee 10% x $630.00 63.00 TOTAL - LUMP SUM FEE $693.00 Time Schedule / Product Delivery Project Mapping as defined within the scope of servieet will be completed and delivered to client within forty five (45) calendar days from notice to proceed. Product delivery shall consist of one set of AutoCAD, Version 11, drawing files on disk of © WAI's mapping with RDA's additions in manuscript format. One set of ink on mylar drawings, machine plotted from the disk, will also be furnished. WFor your perusal, we are also enclosing a copy of WAI's cost proposal to HDA. Thank you and m until further notice, we remain at your service. to W Sincerely, V HORTON DENNIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. W tD w Donald B. Burns, PLS p Survey Manager WDBB/jp it C�7 RJ I iL Q1 4Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. • Consulting Engineers, Planners, & Surveyors • Kirkland, Washington WALKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERS In d November 16, 1992 Mr. Don Burns Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. 320 Second Avenue South Kirkland WA 98033-6687 Re: Professional Mapping Services - Renton/Metro Sewer Route Dear Don: Walker & Associates, Inc. will furnish the photogrammetric mapping services necessary to produce topographic mapping at 111 = Sol with a 2' contour interval of an approximate 12 acres of mapping along North Third Street in Renton from Burnett on the west to Factory on the east. Corridor will be approximately 200PX25001. This .;mapping will tie in to the -mapping previously done for HDA in.June.of.1991 and we will use the existing aerial photography and ground control obtained for the first phase -of -the project. Maps will be prepared utilizing standard stereophotogrammetric compilation methods. Features to be shown will include all those visible on the photography which are generally shown on 50 scale maps meeting National Map Accuracy Standards. Metro symbols and line weights will be used. Any areas where we are unable to see the ground because of dense tree or brush cover will be indicated with dashed contours. Job specifications will be the same as the North Second Street mapping, with AutoCAD files adhering to Metro layering and symbology specifications. The following materials will be delivered: - One set reverse plotted, wet ink on mylar machine drafted manuscripts at a scale of 1" = 50, with a contour interval of 21 (two total) - One set AutoCAD R.11 drawing files in Metro Mapping Specifications. The job will be scheduled immediately upon receipt of your signed authorization. to. proceed. The finished maps will be delivered two.to three weeks. -after contract'letter-has been received. Any questions regarding-the-p=ogress of this job . should be directed to Jeff Schramm, our Production Manager. 03 V W A '12e52 INTERURBAN AVENUE S0. 0 SEATTLE. WA 96166 (3 PHONE 1206) 244-2300 O FAX: (2o6) 2A4.2333 _ WALKER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. RHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERS C� a_ Page two Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. Don Burns t� v 03 iD v] I) W W co to W (D CL F-- W tv cv s� Ca U. W , Walker & Associates, fee for this project will be $ 2670.00. We will make progress billings as necessary. Additionally, Walker & Associates can provide an AutoCAD R.11 Metro translation of previously mapped area east of Factory for an additional $630.00. If Walker is to translate the previous mapping, signify by checking and initialing here This will bring the total fee to $3300.00. If the above conditions meet with your satisfaction, please sign one copy of this letter to accept responsibility for payment of our services, and to authorize Walker & Associates, Inc. to proceed with this project. If you have any questions, or changes in the scope of work, please call me or Glenn Summerfelt at (206)244-2300. Thank you for contacting Walker & Associates, Inc. Very truly yours, Walker ®& Associates, Inc. Richard L. Schneider Project Development cc : file WAX Est 092-393 signature Date FEB 18 '99 02:43PM METRO -LEGAL SVCS GRP P.112 0 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle DIVISION FACSIMILE COVER SHEET NAME: FAX NUMBER: DA v s COMPANY: PHONE NUMBER: Ci4-y d(— FROM NAME: FAX NUlv1BER: (206) 689-- Z� PHONE NUMBER: (206) 684 MESSAGE NUMBER OF PAGES (Including Cover Page) The information c octaimed in this facsimile is confidential and may also be attorney -privileged. The iafnrmasion is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom It is addressed If you are cot the intznded rocopieat, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this comtauaieadon is Strictly prohibited. If you have received the facsimile in error, please immediately notify us by a coQect telephooe cell to (206) 694-1002, and return the original message to us at the addrewabove via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. f iY� CALL (206) 684-140tto report any problems receiving transmission- FEB 10 '93 02:43PM METRO -LEGAL SVCS GRP P . 22 "i METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. Seattle, WA 98104-1598 February 18,1993 Bruce Anderson Labels and Lists 2500 116th N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Mr. Anderson: I am writing to thank you for releasing a set of mailing labels for the Cedar River Trunk relocation project, indexed at your office under Metro # 105, to Dave Christenson of the City of Renton's Wastewater Utility Systems division. Dave will arrange payment with your office. Thanks again - Sincerely, Ron Post f� r lO Community Relations 1" v Water Pollution Control Department 0 (206) 684.1280 • Clean Water -A Sound Investment CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION RESCHEDULED Metro and the City of Renton have agreed to postpone the construction of Phase One of the Cedar River Trunk Relocation project until 1994. Budget considerations have forced this construction project to be postponed, but environmental review and design work for the relocated sewer line will proceed during 1993, with North 3rd Street being the preferred alternative. The North 3rd Street alternative was supported over other alternatives at a public meeting last September, primarily due to its ability to provide a means for transportation and local sanitary sewer collection system improvements. Phase One of the project will involve placing a new 48-inch sewer line through the North Renton neighborhood. Phase Two will involve relocating the pipe under Interstate 405 and along a portion of the Maple Valley Highway. Phase Two will probably occur sometime after 1995. The City of Renton wishes to clarify the potential transportation benefit that the North 3rd Street alternative will provide. It is the intention of the City and Metro to complete the necessary roadway improvements to allow for the downgrading of North 3rd Street from a one-way arterial to a two way local neighborhood street. However, in addition to these improvements, it is necessary to construct the proposed widening of North 4th Street as well as make signal modifications in North 3rd Street prior to North 3rd Street reverting to a two way local neighborhood street. If you have questions about the Cedar River Trunk Relocation project or other Metro water quality projects, please call Ron Post at 684-1143, or you may write to him at Metro, M.S. 95, Water Pollution Control Department, 821 Second Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-1598. If you have questions about the City of Renton's portion of sanitary sewer replacement projects of transportation projects in the North Renton neighborhood, please call Dave Christensen at 277-6212 or you may write to him at the City of Renton, Utility Systems Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. C:DOCS:92-O3O:DMC:ps JAI-11-'93 MOM 11-26 ID -METRO CORP COMM TEL CIO:(206) 62,1-2126 M125 P02 Cedar River trunk relocation rescheduled Metro and the City of Renton have agreed to postpone the construction of Phase one of the Cedar River trunk relocation project until 1994. Budget conQidQrations have /— forced this construction project to be postponed, bu des-19t wurk_aailiif ironmental rev o e re newer line, will proceed during 1993/ c�tr7v- rth Third Street 045�4� � alternative. The North Third Street alternative was supported o.ve�r other alternatives at a public meeting last September��'��'' 70-1r��ury Phase Ono of tho project will involve placing a now 4R- inch sewer line through the North Renton neighborhood. Phase Two will involve relocating the pipe under Interstate 405 and along a portion of thQ Maple Valley Highway_ Phase Two will Probably occur sometime after 1995. If you have questions about this capital project or other Metro water quality projects, please call Ron Post at 684-1143, or you may write to him at Metro, K.S. 95, Water Pollution Control Department, 921 Second Ave., Seattle, WA 95I04-1598. f e est o out the City of Renton's ' ra poL Cation projects in the North renton neighborhood, please call Dave Christensen at 277- 6212, or you may write to him at the City of Renton, 2UU Mill Ave. S., Renton, WA 98055. 2,17`/ Q� ITD.cI �F-v=Tt1,41, i f4 w.�y��rdGa2 �iv: THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS FOURTH FLOOR 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055-2189 FAX: 235-2541 FAX TRANSiVIITTAL DATE: 7-'�A4JA;n"y Hi 0_?� TO: d FAX#: (D 1 FROM: PHONE#: SUBJECT: Number of pages excluding cover sheet: 11/1iorms/mist/FAXCOVER -IX (:/hh JAN-11-'93 MON 11:25 ID:METP.O CORP COMM TEL N0:C206) 60,1-2126 H125 PO1 ""'METRO Munkipnlity of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • S.i Second Ave. 0 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 FAX To:Dive� _ C 1li� S T� From- Phone. • �,Ft � Fax #: 6 s t )- Subject: Instructions: YQUI Pages (including this page).- a r METRO CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION I. PROJECT BACKGROUND: A) Originally constructed in 1964. B) Provides sanitary sewer service to City of Renton, Water District 90, and up to Cedar Hills Landfill. C) Constructed of 42" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). II. PROJECT NEED: A) Concerns over proximity of existing interceptor to Wells 1 , 2, and 3 as well as concerns over vulnerability of RCP to leakage at joints. B) WSDOT SR 405 relocation places a bridge abutment for the new bridge over Cedar River directly on top of the existing interceptor, thereby posing a threat of crushing the 42" RCP. Ill. PROJECTS IMPLEMENTATION: A) Project is included in the City of Renton/Metro Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). B) Metro and WSDOT have entered into an agreement providing for the completion of the re-routing by May of 1992. IV. ROUTE SELECTION CRITERIA: A) Not feasible to relocate the interceptor completely from Zone 1 of APA due to topographical restraints. B) Goal is to locate as far from main production Wells 1, 2, and 3 as possible. C) Route not to conflict with WSDOT SR 405 relocation. D) Provide proper hydraulics in order to at minimum maintain existing level of service. E) Meet goal of completion date of May, 1992. Metro Cedar River Trunk Relocation Page 2 V. ROUTES EVALUATED: A) Routes from east end of Cedar River Park across SR 405: 1) Under bridge route. 2) Interchange route. B) Routes from SR 405 through North Renton: 1) Bronson route 2) 2nd Street route 3) 3rd Street route 4) 4th Street route VI. EVALUATION CRITERIA: 1. Aquifer Criteria 2. Construction Impact 3. Cost 4. Traffic 5. Utility Conflicts 6. Effect on City Collection System 7. Community Impact and Enhancement VII. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Begin Design Documents July, 1991 Public Information Meeting August, 1991 (end of) SEPA Comment Period Begins September, 1991 Advertise Project October, 1991 Award/Notice-to-Proceed January, 1992 Project Completion May, 1992 D:91-578:DMC:ps kju uu LJL,-,i uu ST. At <th 5 T a N 3rd ST. z > CEDAR RIVER 3 W W I I o ROOKS ST TRUNK RELOCATION 3 G O ROUTING ALTERNATIVES LN ST. k L ST. WAY N Legend i Eris" Cedar Rhw Trunk Lm Under Bridge Routs a�,ce Interchange Route J Bronson Roue 2nd S[ Roue .id S[ Routs city itY nh St Route a << Aquifer Protection Area �i • Well 4t% 'z- 7 WAL Earl Clymer, Mayor August 25, 1992 Roger Browne METRO 821 Second Avenue - Exchange Building Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION AND CASCADE SIPHON BRIDGE Dear Roger: Per our meeting of August 10th, I have the following information that you requested: Cedar River Trunkline Relocation: Q. Does the utilidor need to be extended from end of Liberty Park along North 1st Street to the connection point of the 42" to the 108"? A. Yes. In order to provide the minimum level of protection for the well sites the limits of the utilidor need to extend to the end of the 42 " CRTL. Q. If METRO is ready to construct in the summer of 1993, would transportation be ready with street improvements to either North 3rd Street or North 4th Street? A. Transportation has stated that if notified, that North 3rd is the route (by October, 1992) they can have plans ready for the 1993 schedule. Since North 4th route would provide no benefit to transportation, a schedule was not considered. Cascade Siphon Bridge: Q. Can the City utilize a 30" casing within the crossing in lieu of the 36" casing currently proposed for the new watermain from the new well site? A. l spoke with Dan Irvin of RH2 Engineering who stated that a 30" casing would be acceptable for the proposed 16" waterline. If you have additional questions or require more information, please contact me at (206) 277-624-2 , Sincerely, David . Chr' en -serf' Waste r Utility Engineer C:DOCS:92-643:DMC:ps CC: Ron Olsen, Water Utility Harold Adams, Transportation 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 W Earl Clymer, Mayor July 23, 1992 Roger Browne METRO - M/S 117 Exchange Building 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION Dear Roger: Please find attached information to assist you in preparation of the preliminary analysis report of the six action alternatives. This information includes: • A memorandum from the City's Water Utility identifying specific requirements and pros and cons of each alternative. • A copy of the North Renton Neighborhood Plan which includes a proposed plan for the North 3rd/4th Street corridor. • A copy of the North 4th Blvd. project proposal. In addition to the attached information, I have completed the flow analysis for various lines that would be directed to the various alternatives. The routes/flows are as follows: Existing 24" Interceptor in North 4th Street: Total redirected flow: 2550 GPM This line would be redirected to either the North 2nd Street, North 3rd Street, North 4th Street, or North 5th Street alternatives. Existing 24" Interceptor in North 6th Street: Total redirected flow 1850 GPM This line would be redirected to either the North 3rd Street, North 4th Street, or the North 5th Street alternative. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Roger Browne METRO Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Page 2 Proposed 1 5" East Renton Interceptor (South Highlands Alternative): Total flow: 1300 GPM This line would be directed to either North 2nd Street, North 3rd Street, North 4th Street, or North 5th Street alternatives. The line would be installed from the east in the North 3rd Street right-of-way. If you have-aqy questions or require additional information, please contact me at 277-6212. cerely, Vivid M WstenseyK Wastewater Utility Engineer C:D0CS:92-558:D1V1C:ps Ir 04 0 -Z 71. 22-141 50 SHEETS 22-142 100 SHEETS 22-144 200 SHEETS cz �- Earl Clymer, Mayor CITY OF RENTON Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Director North Renton Street Improvement Recommendations To: Renton City Council Via: Earl Clymer, Mayor From: Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Staff Contact: Mel Wilson, Transportation Services Manager Date: April 9,1990 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 t f NORTH RENTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS N.": TM new —d .c(.—ts •red lm fneetl.n e.nn(uretinf f hewn en KAernelk end •n fu►pct le lure M� en(ineerwr( e...+yf it .red c.fmcil oe..t�n TM Intfnt .1 thif d�e(nm n t. $luftrate 1M ($newel $elt erw el the eve.aY [rilfK C-4twn ryft I wkh p-P-4 Mnr.wmente. Street Boulevard 3rd S* t Downgraded f4 Loeil,Traffic LEGEND —1 I Arterial' • — C.Mwcter Artwlal 4-�-; Reeldentlel Street with Livable Street$ Improwrnent( eye 8oW evwd E■1$ting Street@ shown fw reference P 1 hlnclpel Pwking Late Park/Lake Washington Blvd intersection Revision ti \ O f 1 1�1 �D m9I Paccar Co op I I L Jlit "STAGE 3 4 int*rsectic overr►entl afflc at t t:fxruct artet Mouser Wiry Extension {rade We,` al !I Sunset/Bronson Intersection Improvements I - 405 Ramp Modifications Background In 1988 the City Council provided direction relative to the protection of North Renton neighborhoods through council resolution 2708 and in response to the direction for an arterial study to be paid for by E&H Properties. In 1989 the City retained a consultant for the North Renton Arterial Facilitation Process. The goal of the Facilitation Process was to assure that arterials providing access to the North Renton area be designed and operated in a manner that is responsive to the Council's direction and the needs of the citizens. Between September and December of 1989 the Public Works Department conducted an intensive citizen participation process in North Renton. Since December we have clone additional technical work to develop an implementation strategy for the ideas, concerns and suggestions which resulted from the citizen participation process. In doing this work, we interpreted the Council's direction as including three key principles: ❑ It is critically important that the City work interactively and responsively with neighborhood and community residents. The City needs to hear about people's problems and concerns, from them, and respond as best it can. ❑ One of the City's highest priorities is preserving the integrity of single family neighborhoods of Renton, including the North Renton and Kennydale neighborhoods, as quality, single family residential neighborhoods where people choose to live. The North Renton neighborhood, in particular, is a integral part of a viable City core which includes business, residential and governmental uses. ❑ Renton requires a viable transportation system which supports the above uses. It requires a transportation system which is "friendly" to both Renton's residents and businesses. Operating within the framework of these principles required discussion, brainstorming, trust and compromise. There is no ideal solution to transportation problems in North Renton. However, with the recommendations which follow, we believe a major step forward has been made. Scope of Work The scope of work for the North Renton facilitation .process included the following elements: • Reviewing previously completed traffic studies. • Conducting door to door interviews of North Renton residents. • Interviewing people in the business community and holding special meetings with business owners in key areas. Page Three • Conducting six public workshops in the North Renton area. • Developing conceptual solutions in response to community requests. • Coordinating and communicating with all involved City Departments • Reporting results and findings of the citizen process to the Renton City Council. The first workshop was an open house to get acquainted with the members of the community, and learn about their concerns. Approximately 125 people attended. In workshops two and three we discussed with the community the transportation problems and possible solutions. In workshops four and five the community voted on alternative conceptual solutions. At a final workshop, this Council report was presented to the neighborhood in draft form to make sure that residents found it consistent with earlier work. We also asked that the neighborhood to form an ad hoc committee to work with the City to implement these recommendations. Overall Recommendations We are proposing a four stage improvement program based on the following recommended goals: • Tightly regulate traffic flow from Boeing and PACCAR parking lots to and from Lake Washington Boulevard. • Encourage traffic flow to and from Boeing and Paccar lots to I-405 via the North Park Interchange to the north and via Houser Way to the south. • Discourage through traffic from utilizing North Renton's residential streets. • Eliminate one way couplet arterials through the neighborhood. • Address problems of congestion on Sunset Boulevard at Maple Valley and Northeast Third in a manner which will encourage I-405 overflow traffic to remain in the I-405 corridor and discourage this traffic from cutting through neighborhoods. • Enhance the aesthetic and environmental quality of the streetscape by using appropriate landscaping and street constrictions. Projects in the Stage Zero are now ready for construction. Projects in Stage One are now ready for design, engineering and construction. Projects in the Stage Two and Three require more environmental analysis, preliminary design and engineering and funding before they are ready to proceed. If fundable and feasible, projects in the second and third stages would build upon the improvements made in prior stages. Projects at each stage will measurably improve traffic conditions in North Renton; in combination they will lead Page Four to a dramatic renewal of the area. The following narrative describes each stage of the overall program. Proposals Stage Zero — Circles and Diverters. The City has not yet met its commitments under the Council Resolution 2708 to construct traffic circles and diverters at My, Williams and Wells on Sixth and Fifth Avenues. The Administration is committed to ensuring completion of these improvements as quickly as possible. The design and construction is fully funded through the E&H mitigation fees. We can report to you that we have reviewed E&H's plans for traffic circles on Fifth Avenue. In order to provide landscaping as requested by neighborhood residents, we will be requiring E&H to add an addendum to the contract or to provide for these requirements in a later contract. We have directed E&H to put the basic construction contract out to bid. The status of other projects is reported in the Appendix. Stage One — Projects Ready for Engineering and Construction We recommend action on the following projects: 1. Authorization to proceed with preparation of contract plans for the Lake Washington Boulevard/North Park Avenue interchange, including authorization to hire consultants as needed. This improvement is briefly described in an appendix to this report. 2. Authorization to proceed to prepare contract plans for the first phase of the North Renton livable streets program, including authorization to hire consultants as needed. This livable streets concept is described further in the appendix and in graphics being used at the Council briefing. 3. Authorization to prepare contract plans for the first phase of Houser relocation, including authorization to retain consultants as required. The Houser relocation concept is briefly described in the appendix. 4 In addition, several smaller projects will be implemented by the Public Works Department including: o Modification of the signal at 8th and Garden; o Redesign and improvement of the intersection at 4th and Garden as required under Council Resolution 2708; o Improvement of intersection at North Park and loth; and, o Widening of the I-405 underpass on North 3rd Street (as part of the realignment of the '5" curves) Page Five The first stage would be funded by Boeing, Paccar and E & H mitigation fees. In addition to consultant assistance, additional staff will be required and new positions will be requested in the Public Works Department's CIP proposal. Cost considerations are addressed in the appendix. Stage Two -- Projects for Further Design and Environmental Analysis Recommendations at this time for stage two include: 1. Prepare a Council Resolution to proceed with preliminary study and design of widening of North 4th Boulevard between Logan and Sunset. This study will examine how to widen 4th to accommodate two way, east to west traffic through the neighborhood using livable streets concepts. This will also include study and design of surface intersection changes at Sunset, 3rd Avenue and 3rd Place. This design will include modifications of North 3rd Avenue between Logan and Sunset, including authorization to hire consultants as required. This study will examine restriction of traffic on 3rd and designation of 3rd as a residential street rather than an arterial. 2. Prepare a Council Resolution to develop contract plans for the second phase of the Houser relocation and to submit a grant application to CERB for a funding agreement. 3. Prepare a Council Resolution to proceed with three engineering studies related to the North Renton Street Improvements including- 13 13 Preliminary engineering study to improve traffic flow on North Park Drive to and from I-405. Q Preliminary engineering studies for the I1145 corridor. Stage Three —Projects Requiring Further Definition Traffic congestion along the Sunset corridor, specifically in the intersections at 3rd and at Houser Way, continues to be a major concern. We have not yet found conceptual solutions which meet the needs of business interests and the needs of efficient traffic handling. We recommend that you authorize further engineering study in this area, including authorization to hire consultants as needed Page Six Appendix ■ E&H Property Related Projects ■ Proposed Lake Washington Boulevard/North Park Avenue Intersection Improvements ■ Proposed livable streets plan ■ Proposed relocation and extension of Houser ■ Cost Proposal E&H Property Related Projects Mitigation requirements for the development of E&H Properties (Park and Garden Plaza Buildings) included completing 46 specific traffic improvements and, in addition, posting a $1.1 Million bond for their proportional share of regional traffic improvements identified in the North Renton Arterial Study (this report). Work is underway or has been completed on all but 5 of the 46 items. The five items which require additional work are: ❑ Formation of a City/Citizen Committee concerning traffic diversion was called for. Essentially, this work has been accomplished in a different manner, specifically through the North Renton Arterial Study which is summarized in this report. ❑ Evaluation of 20-year development land use scenarios in terms of their impact on the transportation system was called for. The Community Development Department is currently estimating the costs of the study and will be requesting funds from E&H to proceed, ❑ Provision of a $1.1 Million bond to fund regional transportation improvements recommended from the North Renton Arterial Plan to be adopted by the Council. Recommendations for that plan are the main substance of this report. ❑ Realignment of Garden Avenue at North 8th Street to remove the existing dog leg. A bond of $807,000 was required for this work. It is recommended that this bond be continued until engineering plans, right-of-way acquisition and permits are complete for the relocation of Houser between 8th and Sunset Boulevard ❑ Dedication of 10 feet of right of way on North 6th Street between Garden Avenue North and Park North. The remaining action required is that City obtain an easement for a sidewalk along the south side of North 6th between Garden Avenue North and Park North. Page Two Lake Washington Boulevard/North Park Drive Intersection This project has been developed to accomplish two goals: Reduce the amount.of traffic utilizing Lake Washington Boulevard to reach and leave the Boeing and PACCAR facilities. • Improve access to the Boeing and PACCAR facilities from North Park Drive. The proposed intersection shown on the figure below illustrates how the goals are to be accomplished. The first goal will be met by prohibiting southbound traffic from Lake Washington Boulevard to North Garden, by continuing the restrictions on northbound access to Lake Washington Boulevard and by reducing the frequency of free right turns from Lake Washington Boulevard southbound onto Park Avenue. Northbound and southbound access to Lake Washington Boulevard will be limited to right and left turns to and from Park Avenue North. Southbound traffic volumes will be restricted by changing the signal timing at the North Park Drive and Lake Washington Boulevard intersection. The timing will be modified to limit the number of vehicles through the intersection during peak periods. In order to facilitate access to the Boeing and PACCAR facilities, traffic will be routed from westbound North Park Drive along Lake Washington Boulevard to Houser Way. There will then be direct access to the Boeing and PACCAR lots from Houser Way. Houser Way will become a one-way street southbound for the area between Lake Washington Boulevard and the North Park Drive undercrossing. As a result, it will no longer be possible to enter or exit Lake Washington Boulevard to or from Houser Way. Total cost for this project is estimated to be $621,000. Construction work is intended to take place in 1992. Page Three Livable Streets Plan Heavy traffic volumes through North Renton are severely damaging to the neighborhood's residential qualities and sense of community. Traffic on all of the neighborhood's streets add noise and air pollution and reduce privacy, visual attractiveness and the ability to move freely through the neighborhood. Besides the effect to individual residents, heavy traffic reduces the area's ability to function as a viable community. Congested arterials divide the neighborhood and isolate it from other parts of the city. The wide, characterless arterial streets rob the neighborhood of any community identity, "sense of place" or pedestrian scaled amenities. Clearly, the current traffic patterns, in which traffic from congested arterials spills over on to residential streets, serves neither the needs of resident or commuter. North Renton, with its proximity to the Green River, Coulon Park and Downtown and solid housing stock, has the capability to support a viable community, but the traffic problem must be dealt with before effective revitalization efforts can be successful. Traffic planning experience has shown that to be effective, neighborhood oriented traffic improvements must work as a coordinated system to accommodate traffic on preferred routes as well as restrict flow on residential streets. A traffic bulb here or a diverter there will not be sufficient. Any'livable" streets' plan intended to improve residential and pedestrian conditions must integrate traffic and community concerns using a variety of traffic control and neighborhood urban design measures. The North Renton livable Streets plan will be accomplished in two stages and is based on the following strategy. In the first stage of the livable Streets program o Install a system of diverters, traffic circles and widened sidewalks to discourage traffic on residential streets. The system will allow residents to enter and exit the neighborhood but will slow through traffic. a Improve conditions for through -traffic on major arterials such as 4th Street, 6th Street, Bronson Wayand Logan Avenue as the neighborhood's perimeter so that motorists will be less inclined to cut through on residential streets. • Install Gateway signs or public artwork and a decorative fence, wall and/or landscaping around the perimeter of the neighborhood are recommended to increase community identity. a Undertake an extensive street landscaping - urban design program to upgrade the neighborhood's visual qualities. Landscaping on residential streets can vary to suit the street's scale and preferences of local residents. In the second stage of the livable Streets Program: t7 Downgrade North 3rd Street to a local street, reducing the number of arterials cutting throug5 h the neighborhood. Develop North 4th Street as a major, two-way boulevard with a middle turn lane with extensive plantings to buffer adjacent residences. Taken together, these improvements will not only mitigate the negative aspects of traffic in North Renton, but also serve as a positive community -building program to revitalize the neighborhood. A graphic on the next page gives a picture of what these improvements might look like. Page Four "Before and After" Sketches of Neighborhood Oriented Street improvements for the North Renton Arterial Plan Relocation and Extension of Houser This project is intended to relieve traffic pressure on the North Renton neighborhood. It will do so by providing a frontage road to 1-405. This frontage road will provide easier ingress/egress for PACCAR and Boeing employees than currently exists. The frontage road will consist of a new roadway as shown in green and pink on the attached Figure. This roadway will be east of the existing railroad and west of 1-405. On the south end, a new interchange will be necessary at Sunset Boulevard (SR-900). The northbound lane for this interchange will cross under Sunset, and then connect with Sunset in front of the existing Omar Kyan Restaurant. The southbound lane will connect to Sunset at grade approximately 300 feet from where the southbound off -ramp of I-405 meets Sunset Boulevard. On the north end, the roadway will connect with the existing Houser Way at North 8th Street. Total cost for this project is estimated to be $3,640,000. At this time construction is anticipated to begin in 1992 with final completion in 1993. Page Six Cost Proposal Estimated costs for the improvements recommended in this proposal total $5,145,000. Estimated expenses and recommended sources of revenue are as follow. Estimated Costs Lake Washington Boulevard Intersection $ 621,000 Livable Streets Program 884,000 Houser Relocation and Interchange 3,640,000 Total• $5,145,000 Recommended Sources E&H Properties Mitigation $1,100,000 Boeing Mitigation 820,000 CERB Grant Requested 2,500,p00 Estimated PACCAR Mitigation 725,000 Total: $5,145,000 Page Seven NORTH 4TH BOULEVARD LOGAN AVE N TO MONTEREY DR NE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROPOSAL Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Lynn Guttmann, Administrator Prepared By: Transportation Systems Division Mel Wilson, Transportation Systems Director Harold Adams, Transportation Engineering Supervisor Rod Schindler, Project Manager JULY 1992 NORTH 4TH BOULEVARD TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ProjectObjective........................................................................................... I I. Project Background.............................................................................. I II. Project Description............................................................................... 1 A. Existing Conditions.......................................................................I B. Scope of Work.............................................................................3 C. Preliminary Design Elements...........................................................3 D. Special Design Considerations .......................................................... 4 E. Right-of-Way..............................................................................5 F. Environmental Documents...............................................................5 G. Permits ............. ....................................................................... ..5 H. Value Engineering........................................................................5 1. Preliminary Design Funding............................................................5 J. Funding Sources...........................................................................5 K. Project Scheduling........................................................................5 III. Involvement/Participation.......................................................................6 A. Community.................................................................................6 B. Agencies....................................................................................6 C. Private Utilities............................................................................6 IV. Staffing.............................................................................................6 A. Project Management......................................................................6 B. Design Responsibility....................................................................6 C. Design Team...............................................................................7 D. Reviews.....................................................................................7 Management Acceptance and Commitment.............................................................8 Appendix: .................................................................................................... 9 Project Viscinity Map Project Location Map Zoning Map NORTH 4TH BOULEVARD PROJECT OBJECTIVE The purpose of this project is to prepare preliminary engineering design to change North 4th Street into a two-way landscaped arterial boulevard and to change North 3rd Street into a two-way residential access street using livable streets concepts. (See attached Vicinity and Project Location Maps). I. Project Background In accordance with Renton City Council Resolution 2708 the Livable Streets Plan was developed and intends to assure that arterials providing access to the North Renton area be designed and operated in a manner that is responsive to the Council's direction and the needs of the citizens. This project is needed to comply with this direction by developing North 4th Street into a major, two-way boulevard as described in the Project Objective above. This change done in conjunction with the changing of North 3rd Street from a one-way arterial to a two-way local street will not only mitigate the negative aspects of traffic in North Renton, but also serve as a positive community -building program to revitalize the neighborhood. H. Project Description A. Existing Conditions North 4th Street and North 3rd Place, from Logan Avenue North to Houser Way North, each have a roadway width of 44-feet and operate as a 4-lane one-way westbound principal arterial street. North 3rd Street, from Logan Avenue North to Burnett Avenue North has a roadway width of 28-feet and operates as a 2-lane one-way eastbound principal arterial street. North 3rd Street, from Burnett Avenue North to Factory Avenue North, has a roadway width of 44-feet and operates as a 3-lane one-way eastbound principal arterial street. North 3rd Street, from Factory Avenue North to Houser Way North, has a roadway width of 44-feet and operates as a 4-lane oneway eastbound principal arterial Street. North 3rd Street, from Houser Way North to Sunset Boulevard North, has a roadway width of 75-feet and operates as a 7-lane two-way principal arterial street. North 3rd Street, from Sunset Boulevard North to Monterey Drive Northeast, has a roadway width of 58-feet, passes under I-405 and operates as a 5-lane two-way principal arterial street. The street roadways are constructed of asphalt over cement concrete and have curbs, sidewalks and drainage. The following intersections have traffic signals: North 4th Street at Logan Ave North, Williams Avenue North, Park Avenue North, Garden Avenue North and Factory Avenue North; North 3rd Street at Williams Avenue North, Park Avenue North, Garden Avenue North and Factory Avenue North, Sunset Boulevard North and Monterey Drive Northeast. Average daily traffic flow rates are as follows: N 4th St - 14200 (4 lanes one-way westbound) N 3rd PI - 10500 (3 lanes one-way westbound) N 3rd St - 12900 (2 lanes one-way eastbound) NE 3 St - 30700 (two-way from I-405 to Monterey) Properties bordering North 4th Street, North 3rd Street, North 3rd Place and Northeast 3rd Street are zoned as R-2, R-3, R-4, P-1, B-1, L-1, H- 1. (See attached Zoning Map). Accident totals from January 1, 1988 to January 1, 1991 are as follows: North 4th Street and North 3rd Place between Logan and Houser there have been a total of 125 accidents reported; North 3rd Place between Logan and Houser there have been a total of 131 accidents reported; and, North 3rd Street and Northeast 3rd Street between Houser and Monterey there have been a total of 78 accidents reported. 2 B. Scope of Work Prepare preliminary engineering design, which will include preparation of a layout plan, profile, impacts evaluation and estimating cost for: 1. Widening North 4th Street and North 3rd Place to the north from Logan Avenue North to Houser Way North, to a two-way principal arterial boulevard; 2. Widening North 3rd Street, from Houser Way North to Monterey Drive Northeast; and 3. Turning North 3rd Street, form Logan Avenue North to Houser Way North, back to a residential street by a. Determination of treatment for the Logan Avenue North to Burnett Avenue North section of North 3rd Street. This may include eliminating access to North 3rd Street from Logan Avenue North; b. Removing the traffic signals on North 3rd Street at Williams Avenue North, Park Avenue North, Garden Avenue North and Factory Avenue North; and C. Narrowing North 3rd Street to 36-feet, converting it to two-way residential traffic with parking on both sides and adding landscaping. C. Preliminary Design Elements The design elements that will be included in this phase of the design are: 1. Preparation of a layout plan (scale 1" = 50') and profile showing curbs, sidewalks, curb ramps, driveways, medians, channelization, adjustments to existing features and right of way needs. 2. Determination of roadway base and pavement design needs. 3. Evaluation and cost of alternative design elements. 3 4. Preparation of a cost estimate which shall include such items as: mobilization, removals, adjustments, relocations, roadway paving, curbs, sidewalks, curb ramps, driveways, drainage, street lighting, traffic signals, channelization, excavation, embankment, retaining walls, rockeries, and landscaping. Also include right of way costs, and administration and engineering costs. D. Special Design Considerations Special design considerations for this phase of design shall be given to: 1. Traffic data analysis to determine number of lanes needed. 2. What streets will continue to cross N 4th, what type of traffic control devises to use; and how it will effect the Fire Department response routes and residential access. 3. The needed width of the undercrossing of I-405. 4. The remaining life of the existing pavement section will be evaluated relative to the new traffic loading and volumes anticipated on the completed roadway to determine if it can be salvaged or if it will need to be replaced. 5. The City of Renton's Aquifer Protection Ordinance. North 4th Street is in Zone 1 of the Renton aquifer. 6. Coordination with the Park Avenue North Widening Project and the North Renton Livable Streets Project. 7. Coordination with David Jennings of the Storm Water Utility Section regarding preliminary analysis of existing drainage facilities and conveyance systems and preliminary determination of new drainage and water quality needs and costs in accordance with City of Renton Storm and Surface Water Drainage Ordinance. 8. Coordination with Dave Christensen of Waste Water Utility Section regarding proposed Central Renton Phase I, II and III; and North Renton Phase I, II and III sanitary sewer Capital Improvement Projects as well as Metro's proposed relocation of the Cedar River Trunkline that may utilize either the North 3rd Street or North 4th Street corridor from Burnett Avenue North to Factory Avenue North. 4 9. Coordination with Abdoul Gafour of the Water Utility Section regarding incorporation of water main improvements. See Appendix for Scope, Preliminary Cost, Funding and other Considerations. 10. Coordination with Rebecca Lind reguarding the Revised Comprehensive Plan for the following elements: Land Use, Transportation, Utilities and Capital Facilities. E. Right -of -Way Preliminary right of way acquisition needs and costs will be determined as part of this design phase. F. Environmental Documents An Environmental Checklist will be prepared as part of this design phase. G. Permits Not needed for this phase of design. H. Value Engineering Not proposed in this phase of design. I. Preliminary Design Funding The estimated funding for project management, administration and preliminary design is $80,000. Final design and construction are not funded at this time. J. Funding Sources This project is Rank No. 32 in the 1992 through 1997 Six year TIP. Preliminary design is funded with $50,000 from 1991 Business License Fees and $30,000 from 1992 Business License Fees. Design and construction are unfunded at this time. K. Project Scheduling This is not a high prioity project, therefor, it will be worked on as time permits. 5 III. Involvement/Participation A. Community Community openhouses will be held as needed to present the project, recieve community input and summarize the technical findings. B. Agencies WSDOT and Metro Transit/Sewer will be coordinated with throughout this design phase. C. Private Utilities The affect on private utilities will be determined during this design phase. IV. Staffing A. Project Management The project manager will be Rod Schindler from the Transportation Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department. B. Design Responsibility Preliminary engineering design for this project will be done mostly inhouse by the transportation Services Division with assistance from the design team members and a consultants as needed. C. Design Team The North Renton Technical Review Committee will be used for this project. It consists of the following people: Karl Hamilton - Traffic Operations Rebecca Lind - Planning/Technical Services Jim Hansen - Development Services Gary Gotti - Fire Department Sam Chastain - Parks Department Rick Stoddard - Police Department David Jennings - Utilities Harold Adams - Transportation Design Rod Schindler - Project Manager D. Reviews City of Renton divisions, departments and design team members will be involved during reviews. MANAGEMENT ACCEPTANCE AND CONMUTMENT Project: North 4th Boulevard - Lop -an Ave. to Monterey Dr. NE The following signatures indicate concurrence with the project scope, schedule and budget as outlined in this project proposal. I e � Z-4. �� � — / - 3 /- �Iz Project Manager Date Transportation Engineering Supervisor Date 2 * Z- ; fl-o --I -�" � � .2 "/ � '9 -3, Transportation Systems Director Date l Vtility Sys te irector Date evelopmentServices Director Date Planni ilding and Public Works Administrator Da e Z/ PI annin # &Technical Services D rector Dat c:IP'-\w—b-.— See next page for Maintenance Services Director MANAGEMENT ACCEPTANCE AND COMMITMENT Project: North 4th Boulevard - Logan Ave. to Monterey Dr. NE The following signatures indicate concurrence with the project scope, schedule and budget as outlined in this project proposal. Project Manager Transportation Engineering Supervisor Transportation Systems Director Utility Systems Director Date Date Date Date Mainten ce Services Director Date Planning, Building and Public Works Administrator Date � vv��l• r i� -; L- ML' � �-1,E �/� C r Tz-I � v S Z �t)EA1CL /&i T� 19VL3'i /41-_L b) �mi Erd I LL ( lfZ-1GL:-- 4E—� i 5 "/Vi 6— I l� KtLa 5 l -lrOn -.L 0-6 L:]�X TzEkr.li f S i�7i� 6 C. �c � /yi4 I� Z ✓�/� t c L 10 In z z > Q N 8th < Y Q z O J Z ST N 6th ST z V NE 12th STCD 0 z Q 900 z NE 10th w PL sg Of w NE 10th m NE 9th PL � � NE 9th ST Z v W NE 8th PL 2Cl CC ST 7th IC NE 6th PL s� Q F`�, z � J 9� m q� Project Location N Sth ST a C z �J J a a " N 4th ST c 3rd ST Of 3 } J Of � p O a n- a y c� 2nd ST WAY r 7S .� a Project Location Map 1 �\ CITY OF RENTON a l&6/9,.aee.t/P.wfc WWI. NORTH 4TH BLVD Logan Ave N to Monterey Dr NE \\ aiL RL IMF(: _ WALL WMQT� OF � G 6E�AR \ N 6bF, ST N 6tF, S PI I Zoning Map I~ (n .1- _r / / �,� j 3 3 C� THIS MAP IS TO ASSIST IN DETERMINING THE GENERAL ZONING OF PROPERTY AND IS FOR ILLISTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY G-1 RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE FAMILY R-I RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE FAMILY R-2 RESIDENTIAL - TWO-FAMILY R-3 RESIDENTIAL - MULTIPLE FAMILY RA RESIDENTIAL - MULTIPLE FAMILY P-1 PUBLIC USE B-I BUSINESS USE N 5th ST O-P OFFICE PARK L-I LIGHT INDUSTRIAL -I I M-P MANUFACTURING PARK H-1 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL T TRAILER PARK N 4th ST - Z Rti Ry R2 �(> P I Z e� u �f _ R °q R `i Rz K Rs R9 L Li L i R3 rc� Fl2 R2 W a R� �? Q CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 1, 1992 TO: Lys Hornsby Y71/V l L FROM: Dave Christensen SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION METRO REQUEST FOR APA INFORMATION Metro is in the process of preparing a preliminary design report evaluating the following options/routes for relocation of its trunkline to further protect the City's water supply: 1) Installation of utilidor on existing line 2) North 1 st Street/Bronson Avenue North 3) North 2nd Street 4) North 3rd Street 5) North 4th Street 6) North 5th Street In order for Metro to complete its report, they need the following information regarding the APA: 1) Limits of utilidor alternative; and 2) Methodology to be utilized to quantify and qualify the level of protection each alternative provides. Attached for your information is a map showing the six alignments. Metro is hoping to have this information soon so that they can incorporate it into their report. Thank you for your assistance. D:92-250:DMC:ps Attachment 1 115th 11 11 1 1 n :rom e t , d of Cedar River Park across SR Ind ridge.route. rcha ge route. r ot through North Renton: te te th Street route IOi%' CRITERIA: Aquifer Criteria %oouwn mrCn TRUNK RELOCATION ROUTING ALTERNATIVES tttecrt qn CitylCIDII*tion System CornUDU ct and Enhancement Legend Existing Cedar River Trunk Line �T Lhder Bridge Route Interchange Route #! .gn Dveume t July, 19 Bronson Route 2nd St. Route h"f& n )tion Meeting August, n o 3rd St Route <th St. Route •a•,::::::::: omicrt #?e€itd; IRg�r entembip Aquifer Protection Area e frc�lec_................a :' October, 1991 Ott to i�rcft Qld January, 1994D Well Carr 'Iet r May, 1992 a ►� Ad0k Washington State MAP Department of Transportation�� 'nct l s� =325 S.E. 30th Place F !evue. Washington 98007-6568 L 206) 562-4000 Its Mr. Douglas Houck WPCD Staff Engineer Metro 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Dear Mr. Houck: 'Rr,,,71F[) Duane Berentson j retnrVTf 19gTortati Transportja[l syA... " November 4, 1991 CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept. RE: SR 405 Renton 'S' Curves Metro's 42' Sewer Line This is to clarify two issues related to your 42 inch sanitary sewer which crosses SR 405 near the Cedar River in Renton. First, we have fuii concurrence in ViSDOT to fill the present pipe crossing SR 405 with concrete in lieu of removal. Second, you asked for availability of the horse shoe area at SR 169 (Maple Highway) for your new crossing of SR 405. ABANDONMENT OF PRESENT CROSSING Attached is a letter stating conditions under which the present crossing can be abandoned rather than removed. The first two conditions relating to filling the pipe are your responsibility. You will also be responsible to acquire any necessary permits for this work. The third condition relating to the stability of the pier excavation will be handled by WSDOT. We need your stated concurrence with these conditions. AVAILABILITY OF STAGING AT SR 169 Our contractor will need this area for physical work and construction staging about April 1, 1992. Your work in this area crossing SR 405 must be done by that date. If not, you will not be permitted to start the work until April 1, 1996 when our project completes. We understand this is likely to require a temporary crossing about 200 feet north of the existing location. Again, you will be responsible to acquire any necessary permits. We will work with you on acquiring permits for the temporary crossing to avoid any potential conflict with the dates expressed above. Pl.easP advise us of your concurrence with the above arrangements and your schedule for the temporary and permanent relocation plans. John Johnson and Wally Hendricks (545-6795) will continue to provide active assistance in this coordination. JL/WRH/ce Attach. cc: Roger Brown, Metro Robert Aye, WSDOT / David Martin, City of Renton ✓ Terry Paananen, WSDOT Sincerely, James Lutz, P.E. Project Development Engineer DcuC7 you C rG G a4 - / Z 11 AM& fro— VJaMhkKjton Staft DepwbTmwt of Trwnpartabon I ntra- Departmental Communication Date: )cTober 25,i991 From: -. - --ink-le/A. T- tom. A-i I. ;. I ian "ats Lab/Geotechnic.-abject: -,:R--07j. L-79-I 6 5 H-nr-on -S:7- -'urves -dar To: .,,)hnsDn/ n e n a r i S, 71-ewer .,as macie n- r r- iace -.)ene--,.T;- —ie n rl G. 0 t I m a c: ec, i n nc r— n 'A --7 a z ""�-flCT-23-'91 4JED 07:53 ID:WSDOT NORTH SEATTLE TEL NO:206-545-6791 9400 P01 w7IFaMtnqtoState FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL o"'o "n of Transportation TO LOCATION � VOICE PHONE NO. NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDE TRANSMITTAL) MOM Walt VOICE PHONE NO. L. gqg-&-795 FAX PHONE NO. (SCAN) FAX PHONE NO. (PUBLIC) �... .wu.. u ....ice • r . w.IV/Vr , ,'KN , , 1 ...�Ll1 , uL , t_i 110 LrJO�.�f.7-O f 71 a•ywa� P 02 �- �i�-t'�t%d 0�-�4---1 .�� i9y / 72f764/t L IJbsIM•&& 4-9 t.Ev. 3•t. Pl E*.. - C-;fJAP- vE2 R1 pCaE `- v. AT -"-NO Or METR.p ',�N-ZE:NF-RL 07 r:i� iC l N !� �1- y �0 METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 January 28, 1992 Lynn Guttman, Administrator Planning, Building, and Public Works Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton Washington , Dear Ms n CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept. Enclosed for your information is a set of the minutes from the January 22 meeting of the City of Renton and Metro Cedar River Trunk Relocation project team. I hope this briefing is of help to you. On another matter, as you requested, I briefed Jay Covington on Monday on the Metro resolution before our Water Quality Committee on Thursday, January 30. The reso requests Metro Council authorization "to begin negotiations with the Boeing Company to use reclainmed effluent for heating/cooling purposes". I also let Jay know that Boeing has submitted to your environmental review office, an expanded SEPA checklist which includes effluent heating/cooling as a potential mitigation item. Valley Daily News contacted Metro yesterday requesting more information on the reso and future efforts. If you would like more detailed information on this subject, or any other, or a copy of our reso, feel free to contact me at 684-1782 (Downtown) or 684-2442 (Renton). Finally, please let me know if you have any suggestions on how we can continue to keep you and your staff informed and/or improve inter -agency communication overall. Vicki Renier Renton Projects Liaison Attachment cc: John Spencer, Metro Roger Browne, Metro Doug Houck, Metro Memo January 28, 1992 TO: File FROM: Vicki Renier SUBJECT: Cedar River Trunk Relocation Protect Meeting January 22. 1992 - Minutes Attending: Cif of Renton Metro Dick Anderson Doug Houck Dave Christensen Vicki Renier The following notes highlight items discussed and agreements made by the City/Metro project team: 1.) The group agreed that the routes to be examined include first (Bronson), second, third, fourth and fifth avenues and the utilidor concept. 2.) The City would like Metro to narrow the comparison of six alternatives to a minimum of three using as yet agreed upon selection criteria. The selection criteria would be jointly developed. The remaining alternatives would be examined in further detail. 3.) Metro is pursuing a Washington State Department of Ecology Groundwater Grant. 4.) The City (Dave Christensen) would like to be involved in review of Metro's criteria development for predesign and environmental review. This would be of particular help in public review processes. 5.) Dave is the City lead on this project. He will coordinate with Mel Wilson at the City. 6.) The City (Dave) will provide Metro with "coincidental benefit" information. Coincidental benefit is that benefit to the City resulting from Metro's selection of a certain preferred project and route alternative. 7.) Dave can provide information to Metro as needed in regard to housing affected by construction activities. However, no damage has been quantified through previous City projects. '&METRO Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project Meeting January 22, 1992 Minutes - Page 2 8.) If the WSDOT site is not available, Dave would like to see construction phased to integrate with the City's work in the North Renton neighborhood. This is a mute point if the utilidor concept is selected. 9.) The City would like to review Metro's Public Information Document(s) (PID(s)) on the project before it is sent out. 10.) Metro will provide the City with a detailed project schedule as soon as possible. 11.) Dave will check with the City's consultant on the alley sewer replacement project regarding any potential scheduling conflicts. Is there a possibility of delay to Metro's work? Do they have site information of use to Metro? 12.) The City agreed in concept to a concrete under-layment below the trunk line to provide for utilidor construction if that alternative is chosen. They also preferred that the jacked pipe section not have the annular space grouted. 13.) Metro needs information from the City on start and stop points. Doug Houck of Metro will write a letter to Dave requesting this information. Metro needs this information for selection criteria development. The letter will also request the City's suggested route selection criteria. 14.) The type of pipe, casing, containment and monitoring and telemetry for the utilidor alternative was discussed. I trust this information is consistent with the City's understanding of the meeting. Questions and/or comments should be directed to Vicki Renier, Renton Projects Liaison at 684-1782 or 684-2442. cc: Roger Browne, Metro Earl Rice, Metro Marc Dallas, Metro Gunars Sreibers, Metro Tim Goon, Metro Doug Houck, Metro Dick Anderson, City of Renton Mike Kuenzi, Metro Dave Christensen, City of Renton 'A RECEIVED r - )--7 _9 2 aMETR0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT, I► Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle CITY OF RENTON Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 January 16, 1992 Lynn Guttman, Administrator Planning, Building, and Public Works Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton Washington Dear Ms. man. The purpose of this letter is twofold. First, it provides a copy of Doug Houck's summary of the December 23 meeting of Metro, the City of Renton and WSDOT. Based upon Doug's summary, I think the meeting was beneficial in terms of developing alternatives for the Cedar River Trunk relocation project. I am sorry I was unable to attend. Doug's summary is attached. Secondly, I wanted to inform you of the January 22 meeting which has been scheduled between our staff and yours to discuss the scope of the predesign and the process. Metro's project team has a strong commitment to evaluating alternatives including the utility corridor concept. We are further committed to establishing and maintaining strong lines of communication. I hope this letter and attachment is helpful. If you have any questions, please call me. I may be reached at 684-1782 or at Renton on Wednesdays and Fridays at 684-2442. Since y, Vicki Renier Capital Projects Coordinator Enclosures cc: John Spencer, Metro Roger Browne, Metro Doug Houck, Metro Dick Anderson, Renton Mel Wilson, Renton Bob Aye, WSDOT Jim Lutz, WSDOT Memo January 16, 1992 TO: File FROM: Douglas Houck SUBJECT: Summary of December 23, 1991 Meeting on Cedar River Trunk Relocation Meeting attendees were: City of Renton WSDOT METRO: Lynn Guttman Bob Aye John Spencer Dick Anderson Jim Lutz Roger Browne Mel Wilson Douglas Houck The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the relocation of Metro's Cedar River Trunk and the conflict between Metro's and WSDOT's need to occupy a site NE of the I-405/SR 169 interchange. At the meeting WSDOT stated that they expect to award the I-405 contract on June 1, 1992, that the contractor will begin first on the northern portion of the bridge, and will need the site to set up their office complex along with general staging. It is further expected that they will need the site through September 1996. At this point a number of alternatives were discussed at some length which resulted in four alternatives being developed. They were: 1) Delay construction for relocating the Cedar River Trunk until 1996. 2) Using a phased approach, have Metro complete their construction within the site by June 1992. 3) Work with WSDOT's contractor in determining if joint occupation of the site is feasible. 4) Have WSDOT's contractor occupy another site for staging. :�' mr=TR0 Cedar River Trunk Relocation January 16, 1992 Page 2 After further discussion the second alternative was deleted. It was unlikely that the required phased SEPA review could be completed in time and there is a feasible alternative which does not go through the site in question. Therefore, as the final route has not been selected the cost for the emergency phased construction may be wasted. The City was going to work with WSDOT over the next two weeks to determine if alternative four was feasible. The Houser site under consideration would need an easement from the railroad and had other outstanding issues. Metro was requested to give WSDOT a time schedule (see attached) for starting and finishing the construction within the site. This time schedule would need to be a firm commitment from Metro. During the discussions, it was decided that no alternative could be summarily deleted and there were currently six alternatives which need to be examined. They are Bronson, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Avenues, and a utility corridor in the park. I would propose that we regroup with the City and come to an agreement on the level of work needed to assess the six alternatives. The product of this work would be a fully developed predesign report and SEPA review. A full public involvement process would be included. We also now have the time to pursue a WDOE groundwater grant which could pay for 50 percent (up to $1 million) of the construction costs. As such, I've asked Vicki Renier to set up the meeting with the City and have begun discussions with Tom Esparza, Metro Grants Administrator, on the requirements for a WDOE grant. Please let me know if you have other recollections of the meeting or comments on how we should proceed. 10/2/91 1/1/92 4/1/92 7/1/92 9/30/92 12/30/92 3/31/93 6/30/93 9/29/93 12/29/93 3/30/94 Easement Acquisitition Gather Information 0 Public Hearings Design SEPA Determination Grant Application Permits Bid & Award Cedar River Trunk Relocation - Phase II Grant Approval Project Timeline (projected) Start Date 1 /1 5/92 1 /22/92 1 /29/92 2/5/92 2/12/92 2/19/92 2/26/92 3/4/92 3/1 1 /92 3/18/92 3/25/92 4/1 /92 4/8/92 4/15/92 4/22/92 4/29/92 5/6/92 5/13/92 5/20/92 5/27/92 6/3/92 6/10/92 6/17/92 6/24/92 7/1 /92 7/8/92 7/15/92 7/22/92 7/29/92 8/5/92 8/12/92 8/19/92 8/26/92 9/2/92 9/9/92 9/16/92 9/23/92 9/30/92 10/7/92 1 0/1 4/92 1 0/21 /92 10/28/92 1 1 /4/92 Easement Acquisition Design Gather Information Public Hearings SEPA Permits Reza/ r*,, <,foN t r Part Kr ';t-7' r-s h+ iA �4 0 Bid Award • J41K1444 r7o^J J 0 P&yf. =' o a— Oft o r T M o rt 77yrn 0.4 i- C s M" i • T -►7a Pa a j rz -r- C- a �D 8 r Ij o Ddy f LA Jk p taT7 C, P o !L FS E fio2 .4 a u I F T o,J `C,¢ 17-&-4fAj- . 6, ,,� ,4 T a ,L T _ . b'mer►zC,�*-rr�y co^rs712- 0n1 Z-46s C"Ci//4c,. (j K ti S +sr— (^I F�0 2 cow raoo-L i2 ems ,a -a e—A" •r v%j T', S DUT L" K 4 r~ o.- L-r- s a „mac, 'a 07tF-A s 2eyI WJ W44;— ivi2G�trYLTj v�C� ti}ro VbT o / QVPr�/�QL6 • o pass 1,64e X,C-L y 1=uIL d�—Yb�74/2S wiT G4otb-�Z rrron/i7va�nl4 PUfz0N6 Tars—ye�7e�f, 4 r z 'rc,/ S rJU T Fo c n t, 1�s i� T. Sao Z- 4 o F v l% 1W Earl Clymer, Mayor November 16, 1992 Mr. John Spencer, Director Water Pollution Control Department METRO 821 Second Ave - M/S 82 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT Dear Spencer: Per our telephone conversation of November 10, 1992, 1 have asked my staff to review your request to postpone the construction of the Cedar River Trunkline Relocation until 1994. The conclusion we have made is that your request is acceptable under the following terms and conditions: 1) That pre -design, environmental review, and final design continue on the schedule established for the 1993 construction window. 2) That construction begin no later than the second quarter of 1994 to ensure that the City will not threaten its eligibility for Public Works Trust Fund loans currently being secured for our local sewer replacement project. 3) That coordination efforts with the City's proposed transportation improvements continue to ensure that the timetable for the transportation projects do not slip. 4) That it is understood that construction of the trunkline relocation can be divided into phases. Phase 1 shall be from the connection at the Eastside Interceptor to the easterly right-of-way of Factory Avenue North. Subsequent phases will be established as necessary to meet the scheduling of both the City's Park Department through the Cedar River Park as well as the Washington State Department of Transportation in regards to the 1-405 project. If you concur with Items 1 through 4 shown hereon, please sign the original and copy in the space provided and return this original to the City for its records. This document shall serve as a "Letter Agreement" defining the requested revision to schedule by Metro. This letter meets the intent outlined in Sections 7.2.2 and 8.3 of the Memorandum of Agreement entered into by Metro and the City of Renton. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Dave Christensen at (206) 277-6212. Sincerely, Lynn uttmann, Administrator C:DOCS:92-927:LAG:DMC:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman Dave Christensen Rod Schindler John Spencer Date Director, Water Pollution Control Department 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CONCURRENCE DATE oZ NAM?,;I ITIAVpA' November 16, 1992 Mr. John Spencer, Director Water Pollution Control Department METRO 821 Second Ave - M/S 82 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT Dear Mr. Spencer: Per our telephone conversation of November 10, 1992, 1 have asked my staff to review your request to postpone the construction of the Cedar River Trunkline Relocation until 1994. The conclusion we have made is that your request is acceptable under the following terms and conditions: 11 That pre -design, environmental review, and final design continue on the schedule established for the 1993 construction window. 2) That construction begin no later than the second quarter of 1994 to ensure that the City will not threaten its eligibility for Public Works Trust Fund loans currently being secured for our local sewer replacement project. 3) That coordination efforts with the City's proposed transportation improvements continue to ensure that the timetable for the transportation projects do not slip. 4) That it is understood that construction of the trunkline relocation can be divided into phases. Phase 1 shall be from the connection at the Eastside Interceptor to the easterly right-of-way of Factory Avenue North. Subsequent phases will be established as necessary to meet the scheduling of both the City's Park Department through the Cedar River Park as well as the Washington State Department of Transportation in regards to the 1-405 project. If you concur with Items 1 through 4 shown hereon, please sign the original and copy in the space provided and return this original to the City for its records. This document shall serve as a "Letter Agreement" defining the requested revision to schedule by Metro. This letter meets the intent outlined in Sections 7.2.2 and 8.3 of the Memorandum of Agreement entered into by Metro and the City of Renton. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Dave Christensen at (206) 277-6212. Sincerely, Lynn Guttmann, Administrator John Spencer Date Director, Water Pollution Control Department C:DOCS:92-927:LAG: DMC:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman Dave Christensen Rod Schindler SzE�E s•L12�T 12 9-10- 9-10-M A MT: OLIVET P SITE I TERMINATIO 7-10-1 W 7-10-2W 7-10-3W 7-10-4W 7-10-5W 7-10-6W -10-L 9-10-KPs S •�,- r� -�0 ItoE f.........a .:: t�`+. � 17 Asa+_. To ,0a_Ve_ / C'-`i �rSTerS e r? pee a er© From �h.� // 'rh 4? s' �e user l.Lf; l �y rd ") . D� Subject -Nu .9 10 FUID MESSAGE v W6 REPLY WA Date �!—� / Signed e4u Ep _N9Fo« CITY nF RE jq Date Slgne�ring Dept. vnheonJones °S^ RECIPIENT —RETAIN WHITE COPY, RETURN PINKe90PY From I- �'_' Speed Letter To ti 1 Subject —Na - ll.1FOL❑ MESSAGE_�- tjY„ . t Date % //- Signed REPLY —No SPOLfi —Nc'OPOLO Date Signed WilsoMn 0 Ml45A RECIPIENT —RETAIN WHITE COPY, RETURN PINK COPY. Mlso J oes 7 Carbontess TURN OVER FOR USE WITH WINDOW ENVELOPE. FILL IN NAME AND ADDRESS HERE FOR RETURN IN WINDOW ENVELOPE J -FOLD -FOLD NW 1 /4 AFC 17 TWP 23N ROE, W.M. 1Vll/ PLANTERS PHASING SEQUENCE NORMAL R/R PRE-EMPT 01 02 03 04 TRK CL PE RTN \ o I h �\I 2 y 1j1 ' /"r l'1 1 u M NI 412 411 N'h s I e 10 O W o I 0 > L33 + a v , m W Q�Z 3 3 5+00 / , / 10 NAl U ? t ~3 �-2P; /`— 4 A NU 7 NU DET EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION CHNNLA=02+05+0.L.A. CHNNLB=03+0.L.B.+C (CHNNLC 05 06 07 08 o HOUSER) OVERLAP A�4+SlDET 05] CHNNLCZ4+O.L.A.+C (CHNNLC o HOUSER) OVERLAP B=03(EXT'D CLR) CHNNLD=N.U. POLE LOCATION POLE I STA. OFFSET 10 6+34 R18' 11 5+67 L34 12 5+13 L34' 13 5+41 R62 BRIDGE ABUT!`(ENT 91 92 MAPLE --I— ol /4//ry Y BRIDG - ABUTMENT - �_ --------------- vJ 0 CONDUIT/WIRING SCHEDULE RUN HD RACEWAY N a w ` .-.ul z STREET POWER REMARKS SIZE dw occ <In ou iu ole u •- m NU JT LIGHTS Q �a JN aIn �u1 am nw.m Se I 2' SCN 40 8 TWISTED 2 2' SCH 40 2 TWISTED 3 47. SCH 40 8 4 MAST ARM 4 I 5 3' SCH 40 3 I 2K6 6 3' SCH 40 3 TWISTED 7 8 8 4' SCH 80 4 3 I 2K6 9 MAST ARM 4 t IO 3' SCH 40 2 1 2K 6 II 4' SCH 401 2 1 1 2K6 12 4' sCH 80 4 s 2 216 TWISTED 13 ' SCH 4 6 TWISTED 14 ' SCH 40 4 15 2" SCH 40 16 TWISTED 16 2' SCH 80 6 17 2' SCH 40 6 18 MAST ARM 3 I 19 3' SCH 40 2 1 2C6 20 4' SCH 80 6 2 1 246 21 MAST ARM 2 1 22 2" SCH 40 2 1 TWISTED 23 2' SCH 40 12 2K6 LOOP WIRE IN 2" 24 2`4' SCH 80 II 9 4 TWISTED 25 2 H 6 26 2' SCH 40 I LOOP WIRE IN 2" 27 3 4' SCH 40 12 9 1 306 INTERCEPT/DIVERT. -SC RR. PE 28 E% 3' 2 I 246 29 2' SCH 40 2 1 3K6 30 2' SCH 40 266 TWISTED 31 2" SCH 40 1 SIGNAL DISPLAY OPS OPS OPS R O R O R O R O R O R Y O Y O Y O Y O Y O Y t G 0 13 O G O G O G NG 5 6 7,8 9,11 G 15 AND 16 3,4 12 14 10,13 DISPLAY NOTES: - ALL VEHICLE HEADS SHALL HAVE 12-.INCH LENSES AND 4'INCH BACKPLATES. yEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. - ALL VEHICLE HEADS SHALL BE MOUNTED WITH TYPE-L BRONZE PLUMBIZER EXCEPT HEADS • 3,,t AND 10 WITH A TYPE-M BRONZE ELEVATOR PLUMBIZER AND MEADS • S B 6 WITH A TYPE -H 2-WAY SIDE OF POLE MOUNTING, SEE WSSP J-6f AND DETAIL SHEET II-5. - PEDESTRIAN HEADS #13 AND 416 SHALL BE MOUNTED 10 FT. A80VE SIDEWALK WITH TYPE-E I -WAY SIDE OF POLE MOUNTING. SEE WSSP J-6f AND DETAIL SHEET 11.5• - - PEDESTRIAN HEADS SHALL BE SOLID STATE NEON AND SUPPLIED WITH•Z-CRATE VISORS. - ALL CONVENTIONAL SIGNAL HEADS SHALL BE PAINTED WITH FACTORY APPLIED YEt_L OW BAKED ENAMEL FINISH AND SUPPLIED WITH 12-IMCH ALUMINUM TUNNEL VISORS, BACKPLATES AND GLASS LENSES. THE INSIDE OF THE TUNNEL VISORS AND FRONT OF THE BACK PLATES SHALL BE FLAT BLACK. - VEHICLE HEADS MI THROUGH N6 SHALL BE OPTICALLY PROGRAMMABLE AND SUPPLIED BY THE CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO REPROGRAA4 THE HEADS AS NEEDED UTILIZING 3M BRAND PROGRAMMING TAPE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL NEW-TYPE-L BRONZE PLUMBIZERS, BACKPLATES, RED AND YELLOW ARROW LENSES, AND 1 45• GREEN ARROW LENS. X-••. fi µ........ of S� W .ice' W 17 TWP 23N R3E, W.M. PHASING SEQUENCE _ 2 NU f t2Py A 4 1 r NU t-� 6P NU NU R/R PRE-EMPT TOW PI PC' PTIJ I 6 4 �T� ' EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION CHNNLA=04 HOUSER-CHNNLA SUNSET CHNNLB=02 HOUSER-CHNNLA SUNSET CHNNLC=06 CHNNLD=NU 0,04 AHCE LOOPS AT 7 5' S- CE 0+88 CONDUIT/WIRING SCHEDULE RUNN NO Q RACEWAY SIZE ao� J3 oiN JN a a ou AN =u JVI W aPl 1f'1 u r�O = m JUI STREET LIGHTS POWER REMARKS I EXISTING EXISTING IREMOVE 'MIRES 2 2- SCH 40 8 3 M.A. J I 2012 4 3" SCH 40 1 I I 2012 2.6 FUSE ST. LT'S POLE BASE 5 4- SCH 80 I 1 I I 2012 2.6 6 EXISTING EXISTING REMOVE WIRES 7 EXISTING 1' 6 REMOVE EXIST. LOOP WIRE 8 2' SCH 40 I STUB INTO EX. J-BOX 9 M.A. 2 1 21112 10 M.A. 2 II 3- SCH 40 3 2 1 2N12 2i6 IFU5L ST. LT'S POLE BASE 12 4' SCH 80 2 2 i 2 2N12 246 13 2' SCH 40 10 ISTUS INTO EX. J+BOX I4 2 SCH 40 IS EXISTING 2- EXISTING .. 16 1 2' SCH 40 12 17 1 2- 2' SCH 40 4 1 EXISTING SPLICE INTO EXIST. ALUM. 18 1 2 SCH 40 4 I 2.6 19 M.A. 2 2412 20 3' SCH 40 3. 1 2012 21.6 FUSE ST. LT'S POLE BASE 21 3"4- SCH 8 1 8 3 4 2 I 2012 2.6 2CS 9 5/C IN 4 22 2' SCH 40 16 23 M.A. 3 1 2112 20 3- SCH 40 I 1 I 2012 2016 FUSE ST. LT'S POLE BASE 25 2' SCH 40 8 26 Z' SCH 40 4 27 2' SCH 40 6 28 2' SCH 40 5 29 2 SCH 40 303/0 SEE RISER DETAIL/SERVICE 30 2' SCH 40 346 INTERSECTION SERVICE 31 2- SCH 40 2012 246 ILLUM. SIGN/ST. LIGHTS 32 3' 4' SCH 40 111 3 4 3 1 2CS d 6PR iN 3" SCH 40 33 EXISTING 3' 2 1 2.6 3018 INTERCEPT/DIVERT CONDUIT 81 34 3' SCH 40 1 I 1 2 1 RR PREEMPT USE SC 75 2' SCH 40 2012 2.6 306 SERVICE TO SUNSET 38 1 2' SCH 40 2 SIGNAL DISPLAY OPS OR .R OR R OY OY OY -+ Y OG OG TG G In 1.7 2.5.6 10 13 THRU 18 11.12 8.9 3,4 DISPLAY NOTES: - ALL VEHICLE HEADS SHALL HAVE 12-INCH LENSES AND 4` BACKPLATES SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS - ALL VEHICLE HEADS SHALL BE MOUNTED WITH TYPE-L BRONZE PLUMIZER.SEE WSSP J-61 AND DETAIL SHEET 11-5. - PEDESTRIAL HEADS N14. 415 AND 4I6. $17 SHALL BE MOUNTED 10 FT. ABOVE SIDEWALK WITH A TYPE-E MOUNTING. PEDESTRIAN HEADS-13 AND -18 SHALL BE MOUNTED WITH TYPE-E MOUNTING, SEE WSSP J-6f AND DETAIL SHEET II-S• - PEDESTRIAN HEADS SHALL BE SOLID STATE NEON AND SUPPLIED WITH Z-CRATE VISORS. - ALL CONVENTIONAL SIGNAL HEADS SHALL BE PAINTED WITH FACTORY APPLIED BAKED ENAMEL FINISH AND SUPPLIED WITH 12-INCH ALUMINUM TUNNEL VISORS, BACKPLATES AND GLASS LENSES. THE INSIDE OF THE TUNNEL VISORS AND FRONT OF THE BACK PLATES SHALL BE FLAT BLACK. E - VEHICLE HEAD 010 SHALL BE OPTICALLY PROGRAMMABLE AND SUPPLIED BY THE ; ''� +�sN,y'•,, y CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO REPROGRAM THE HEAD AS F NEEDED - USING 3M BRAND PROGRAM TAPE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN(� INSTALL A NEW TYPE-L BRONZE PLUMBIZER, BACKPLATE, RED AND YELLOW ARROW. LENSES. i :`s ... Washington State w,r Department of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place Bellevue, Washington 98007-6568 (206) 562-4000 Mr. Douglas Houck WPCD Staff Engineer Metro 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Dear Mr. Houck: T.L R Daaane Berentson Secretary of Transportation TrwtspolLt on Syiceias D�,. V September 10, 1991 Cif, Engin OF - RQVro RE: SR 405 g kept Renton 'S' Curves Metro's 42' Sewerline We are now relying upon your commitment expressed in your letter of March 22, 1991 to relocate your 42 inch sanitary sewer Fear the Cedar River in Renton Py May 1, 1992. This letter is to confirm that commitment and to emphasize the criicalness of that timing. Our contractor for the 'S' Curves project will need to start excavation for pier number 5, where the 42 inch sewer is located, about May 1, 1992 in order to meet important future deadlines. Even if a short delay is caused in starting the pier excavation there may be a future contract extension of as much as a year if demolition work at the River cannot be done on schedule. The contract for the 'S' Curves will be about 4 to 4-1/2 years duration and in addition to the costs of delay we cannot afford to extend the interval further. If Metro does not clear the construction site by the May 1, 1992 date we would expect Metro to be responsible for all costs resulting from any delay. As stated above this could be a very substantial amount. John Johnson's office personnel are working with Roger Brown to expedite permit processes and consider some other possibilities. One possibility, after the re-route has been accomplished. is to fill the abandoned pipe with concrete. There are several items related to this alternative to be still checked out. In the meantime, you must proceed with the expectation that the pipe will need to be removed. John Johnson and Wally Hendricks (545-6795) will continue to provide active assistance throughout the construction schedule. Sincerely, James Lutz, P.E. Project Development Engineer JL/WRH/ce cc: Roger Brown, Metro Robert Aye, WSDOT William G. Boland, Asst. Attorney General David Martin, City of Renton Terry Paananen, WSDOT PREDESIGN REPORT CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION Arms No. A65021 SCOPE OF WORK Task No. Y75 This project will replace 3300 linear feet of the existing 42" reinforced concrete pipeline with 4300 linear feet of 42" ductile iron or fiberglas pipeline. The Cedar River Trunk will be re- routed to provide 200 feet of clearance around City of Renton water production wells. The re-route will also avoid interference with a Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) project to reconstruct the S-Curves on I-405 and widen the I-405 overpass crossing for SR-169. BACKGROUND The project has seen several iterations, and is still driven by two concerns. First, WSDOT has plans to relocate and widen portions of I-405 in the vicinity of the SR-169 crossing. Changes in the bridge foundation piers will require removal of the existing sewer. Second, growing concern over the proximity of the sewer to City of Renton water supply wells prompted Renton to request relocation of the trunk to provide a minimum clearance of 200 feet from any well head. In February of 1991, John Spencer made the decision to relocate. ALTERNATIVES The original project scope (1989) centered around protection of the City of Renton Aquifer from potential leakage of the sewer line, particularly in conjunction with the expected disruption of the sewer during WSDOT's work. Several alternatives were examined, which included lining or grouting the existing sewer, bypass during I-405 construction, and wellfield monitoring. Since that time, WSDOT has redesigned their project to suit Renton and Metro has agreed to relocate. Alternatives remaining are related to pipeline routing and material selection only. Routing is limited by traffic considerations, clearance for well heads (200 feet specified), avoidance of existing and future bridge piers for I-405 (WSDOT specified) and vertical clearance from existing commercial building foundations. The only suitable route which meets all requirements is shown on the attached drawing. 1 Materials choices considered for the new pipeline are ductile iron, HDPE and resin/fiberglass. Costs of these materials will be competitive, and offered as alternates for bidding purposes. Concrete joint characteristics are unsuitable for use in this aquifer protection area. COSTS An estimate is attached. Construction costs are expected to be average for the industry, experiencing a 3-4% annual inflation rate. RECOMMENDATION Proceed as directed using prudent judgement. Allow contractor flexibility to propose less expensive construction methods within the available easement and permit restrictions. Provide material alternatives for pipelines to encourage competetive bidding. V, P 1.5, Mlix tw/z. clear. ew CryR both Or/dgICS)­ si/r� Wall Renton " Uxing 4051178 r Aw/la LS Une Allies I Profile Grade and Pivot Pont M Profile Grade and Pivot Polnf- £nd 15J Toter of LN Ste. 258+7525_ 48.oa R1. x/sring Graved Urn- ` e0' R191Y of LS Una Reference Eievollon 10.0 APPROVED BY: 'crklch (for) 3-17-69 .iiructures Engineer 'afflta (for) 4-t9-89 LN Sta. 258.75.25 P.0.7. - 41.0' Rt. 8; F,n N. Frocrurad Fin N ^4+ Finlsn (TypJ i L2Iv r rTv nF" R/F/VTrim PLAN 0� Scme. r - 30' 3° rings of cll tiers - S 73'55'38' E ELEVATION WEST BRIDGE G el tlons snown are finish grooes on LS Une SR 405 /14 f7 erldge Grote Imd w/ side exit to Grate Ih/d Tyra 2 (Sid. Plan 8-0 -!i-ncnied Sealer; ARCO Une Begin 50.1 Toper of LS Sid. 254+75..36 - 24.0' U. To Bellevue 3 8 miles 12 _ Wall 7 y 5' Min. Irr/z. clear. � (rYA ban bridges) City of Radon Teiemefry rr 42'0 Metro Sewerl� �(To V U) be relocated) _--vSRR Une —Prot/N Grade & Pivot Point C ,—= -0. rryp.) Zi 11 O I G CONSTRUCTION OPENING DIAGRAM (V) ^: VSRR Une f O ' ( 14'-5" M/n. (N U.-el ,,-0' M/m (CARGO Une) 1 ; J � 4 -0' rTyp.)-tom L +- race evo -Temp. Late 81 of top of rocawaY sioo and are equal to Drelle grace 3 Q Z g� 8I oat m e ' 31 i Barrier Ci v *:N ao�o rn�oi o C.j , y NI� NIA NIA ��'? rib a CONSTRUCTION OPENING DIAGRAM .n.W hW `nv`�W �T �Fractured Fin xl 1� y � z ` V Une ona C'J;CO Une ' `\ Flnlsh Men.) - v Z ExIstlno Ground Une :7.6' Min. ( :z ow rt% tY Curb Une of East erld--_•rt. c:�,r (�' �+ I CO Year M.R.1. U%1 : __J r. !n. ven. error. 1� i -- - �+ ng 9 ge `���r_-- -- 1 � o slo afs. -cr s.ee of 8rlugel -- '' � � .vormaf NIOh Wa!er t :yi. 24.0- ! _ -' - .. . -Y LY.e r--NSRR Une------� .ARCO S i EEL -LATE '3IRD�. ELEVATION — EAST BRICGE Grade eleva Ions sl wn are fidsn groaes on LN Lire at top of roadway sioD and are ecua to profile groom zz Oato from r�MA ReDcrt. City of Rama( Vote i vent Seals cr Elev. 24.0 LOADING: HS-20 OR TWO 24 K AXLES 2 4' C'TRS. v =__a �- ;TATEI FEo.A10 PROJ.NO.: BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES 11-E91 ? ,=evisea e'ic�e ncnncr ia�ar�ons �+al >N i0 �NASH,� ! ® WOSnir,0Ton State � MAL 7R Earl Clymer, Mayor July 29, 1991 Gregg Bush METRO 821 2nd Avenue M/S 120 Seattle, WA 98104 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: ROUTE ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES CEDAR RIVER INTERCEPTOR Dear Gregg: As a follow-up to our conversation on Friday, July 26, I am forwarding to you two articles from the Valley Daily News. One is a citizen letter written by Ms. Versie Vaupel, the other is an article written by Tina Hilding. The issues that are highlighted here show that there will be strong public interest in the environmental and engineering decisions regarding the sewer line relocation. It appears from the current discussions that the concerns are centering around two points. One, why is the sewer interceptor not being removed from Zone 1 of the Aquifer rather than rerouted within it; and, two, why must the rerouting occur on North Second Avenue as opposed to some alternate route? As we discussed, the answer to these questions will be detailed by the Metro staff with our assistance. Roger Brown of Metro and Dave Christensen from Renton are the project managers. They have the responsibility for providing engineering information, but policy direction needs to come from Dick Anderson, our Utility Division Manager. And, as we discussed, the community relations effort should be spearheaded by Metro. I would like us to be sensitive to the needs of the community by carefully articulating what alternative route alignments were investigated and what criteria will be used to select the preferred route. In addition, we need to provide for public comment of the environmental review documents. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call Dick or me. Thanks so much for all your help. Very truly yours, Lynn G.uttmann tp/Metrolt/LAG/bh cc: Dick Anderson Dave Christensen Jay Covington 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 �r �7R Earl Clymer, Mayor July 24, 1991 Mr. Roger Browne Project Manager Metro - M/S 117 Exchange Building 821 Second Avenue South Seattle, WA 98104-1598 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS Dear Mr. Browne: Per your request, I have contacted all potentially affected departments within the City of Renton with the following information: BUILDING DEPARTMENT: No building permits required for this project. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT: A Public Works Construction Permit wil inspection of the restoration within City Department within the Cedar River Park. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: I be required for City staff to perform right-of-way as well as assist the Parks Per the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Renton and Metro, Metro will be lead agency for this project; therefore, the SEPA process will be administered by Metro with the City reviewing the application. In addition to the SEPA process, a Shoreline Permit will be required if the project falls within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark for the Cedar River (from the permit sketch, it appears you are greater than 200 feet). 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • Metro Mr. Roger Browne Page 2 PARKS DEPARTMENT: Although there are no specific permits required from the Parks Department, Metro will be required to obtain easements from the Parks Department for the new main construction proposed within the Cedar River Park. In addition, it is highly recommended that you coordinate early with the Parks Department to ensure that they are both informed and satisfied with your proposed alignment and methodology for restoration for work within Cedar River Park. You can coordinate this effort through myself or you may contact Jim Shepherd of the Parks Department at 277-5525. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 277-6212. Wastewater Utility Engineer D:91-509:DMC:ps CC: Randall Parsons Ron Nelson, Building Department Paul Forsander, Planning Department Jim Shepherd, Parks Department " METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 June 21, 1991 10-02.251 Y75 Dave Christansen - Project Engineer 200 Mill Avenue South Public Works - 4th Floor Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Christiansen: I understand that you are the City of Renton engineer coordinating Metro's Cedar River Trunk relocation project. Metro proposes to install about 4300 linear feet of 42" sewer line as indicated on the enclosed drawing. To ensure that Metro meets WSDOT's May 1992 schedule for their I-405 construction, I need Renton to review the enclosed alignment and identify all permits which City of Renton (Public Works, Parks, etc.) will require for our pipeline. Would you please put this drawing in the proper hands and have someone get back to me at your earliest convenience? I can be reached at 684-1950 (Phone), 684-1710 (fax) or at the above address, Mail Stop 117. I appreciate your assistance. Expectantly, Roger W. Browne Project Engineer RB/rb/msk j_X enclosure cc: Marc Dallas - 123 Judy Riley - 118 r V „ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building 0 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 April 4, 1991 1.0-02.195 Y75 City of Renton Department of Public Works 200 Mill Avenue South 301Al�3S!l� Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Mr. Dick Anderson L66LL I Utility Manager a3N3osu (tiO N3H d0 A .0 Gentlemen: Metro's Proposed Cedar River Trunk Relocation (Portion) Enclosed is a sketch of the proposed relocation of a portion of the subject 42-inch sewer. Per our phone conversation this date, will you please send us "as -built" information of any, and all surface and/or subsurface facilities you have within the limits of the proposed relocation. This would include: Sanitary sewers - plan/profile; Storm drains - plan/profile; Pavement - plan/grades; Watermains - sidewalk plans; and possible traffic signal conduits and control structures. Also, street monuments with Washington State north zone coordinates, if applicable. We are in the process of developing permit drawings for the various agencies involved, and if the relocation alignment is acceptable to you, the information requested would help expedite our final design. Mr. Eddy Chu of this office is the project engineer, and he may be reached at 684-1299. My phone is 684-1320. Thank you for your help. ZV ,y truly yours, Don. Gleason Senior Designer DWG: ae Enclosure of T ll- �1 oU,,,j 0A C(A S 20N ti l 6CC �,�C-nevi DIcvc AIQ0L%bj 6 M MO 277— Z07 277 — (o2oto 235- �10 3 Z QOG& -c WIDA- �L�l� t�zzt z & Flu r ZY 1 cr,-- c.) LizR, (lo —7 eu L- , -ri e--,!�-7 y r_ MAY 2 ' 91 9: 10 FROM HCW-L PAGE . 00 1 i TELEFAX COVER SHEET 1 CITY OF RENTON kering�DELIVER TO: NAME —4VQ -- ��'►'S t&�'I Dept. FIRM1Rah 2�OA J LOCATION 40 TELEFAX NO. Z Z1 5 SENT FROM: NAME JQ Ae2 A/W41yp%! HAMMOND, COLLIER & WADE - LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. 4010 Stone Way North Seattle, Washington 98103-8090 TELEFAX NO.: (206) 632-0947, Automatic Receive Day/Night CONFIRMATION NO.: (206) 632-2664, Cindy Russell or Michelle laci Total number of pages transmitted, including this cover sheet: Z. It you do not receive all of these pages, please call the confirmation number as soon as pos- sible. Thank you. Comments Z:>avQ, Al#=4�tzw is 4n wa�a�Lr� ac��• 1 Date Transmitted: J51z f HAMMOND, COLLIER & WADE - LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. -" -7- MAY 2 191 9:10 FROM HCW—Li. PAGE .002 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OWNER: City of Renton PROJECT: Metro 42" A. Liberty Pn6 No. 1 Mob 2 Res- ' 3 Ter,-,_ 4 Crusf 5 Select bar" f 6 Pipe Seddimc 7 Tempora,Co d PIIL�r 8 Asphalt Pa-,m—t Patch 9 1. i 10 8- 11 Iz 12 Ts 13 Cl- ** TOTAL PAGE .002 ** •% CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman, Administrator J April 24, 1991 ip J�/ U Mr. Bruce Livingstone, President Hammond, Collier & Wade - Livingstone Associates, Inc. 4010 Stoneway North Seattle, WA 98103 SUBJECT; METRO CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION Dear Mr. Livingstone: The City of Renton is pleased to request your firm's services in developing an action plan and engineering drawings for the relocation of the City's sewer facilities in connection with Metro relocating their 42" Cedar River Trunk Line, under your current annual consultant contract with the City. Enclosed for your information are maps showing the proposed relocation and the existing City mains. The lines we are concerned with are those that tie directly into the portion of the Metro main that is being abandoned. In order to have the Metro line relocated before the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) starts construction of the new bridge over the Cedar River, Metro has set a completion date of May, 1992. To be prepared for the change over, the City must relocate all facilities connecting to the existing line. These facilities will include a main line that collects two or three side sewers, side services from City facilities (i.e. Carco Theater, the Cedar River Recreation Center, a swimming pool, and a stadium), and the sanitary sewer lines from the four well houses in the park. We are in the process of gathering all the data we have on the lines to be relocated and plan to have a package together by Monday, April 29. In the meantime, we would like to meet with you at your earliest convenience to discuss the project prior to a formal submittal of a Scope of Work. Our first goal is to have a rough, conservative cost estimate (Engineering and Construction) submitted by you by May 2, 1991. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Mr. Bruce Livingstone Hammond, Collier & Wade -Livingstone Assoc. Inc. April 24, 1991 Page Two The project manager for this project for the City, David Christensen at 277-6212, is currently on vacation and will be returning on Tuesday, April 30. If you have any questions or are ready to schedule a meeting prior to his return, please contact Mike Benoit at 277- 6206. Very truly yours, RaDd-ffti"L/Parso s E. Storm a d Wa Water Utility Supervisor HCW-METR/MAB:lf Attachment cc: Richard Anderson, Utility Systems Manager Ron Olsen, Water Utility Supervisor John Webley, Community Services Administrator Earl Clymer, Mayor M�►�, April 24, 1991 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttman, Administrator Mr. Bruce Livingstone, President Hammond, Collier & Wade - Livingstone Associates, Inc 4010 Stoneway North Seattle, WA 98103 SUBJECT; METRO CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION Dear Mr. Livingstone: .w o ,2, N INC- 13`�1 The City of Renton is pleased to request your firm's services in developing an action plan and engineering drawings for the relocation of the City's sewer facilities in connection with Metro relocating their 42" Cedar River Trunk Line, under your current annual consultant contract with the City. Enclosed for your information are maps showing the proposed relocation and the existing City mains. The lines we are concerned with are those that tie directly into the portion of the Metro main that is being abandoned. X-A In order to have the Metro line relocated before the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) starts construction of the new bridge over the Cedar River, Metro has set a completion date of May, 1992. �o To be prepared for the change over, a City must relocate II facilities connecting to the 1" existing line. These facilities will include a ine at collects two or three side sewers, side services from City facilities (i.e. Carco Theater, the Cedar River Recreation Center, a swimming pool, and a stadium), and the sanitary sewer lines from the four well houses in the park. We are in the process of gathering all the data we have on the lines to be relocated and plan to have a package together by Monday, April 29. In the meantime, we would like to meet with you at your earliest convenience to discuss the project prior to a formal submittal of a Scope of Work. Our first goal is to have a rough, conservative cost estimate (Engineering and Construction) submitted by you by May 2, 1991. lifA% wcs w��rT 1n1 T7f6� Scovc� ter— w�2K ? fZSvi�/ LAJN i 12-G4ZCA-7rn1 Cone 7'fl /ic r �liA-�v 5 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ` Mr. Bruce Livingstone Hammond, Collier & Wade -Livingstone Assoc. Inc. April 24, 1991 Page Two The project manager for this project for the City, David Christensen at 277-6212, is currently on vacation and will be returning on Tuesday, April 30. If you have any questions or are ready to schedule a meeting prior to his return, please contact Mike Benoit at 277- 6206. Very truly yours, RajadtM"LL arsros,-P. E. Storm a d WaWater Utility Supervisor HCW-METR/MAB:lf Attachment cc: Richard Anderson, Utility Systems Manager Ron Olsen, Water Utility Supervisor John Webley, Community Services Administrator CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: May 2, 1991 TO: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: David M. Christensen, Wastewater Utility SUBJECT: Metro 42-Inch Interceptor 1-405 Relocation The Wastewater Utility Section through its consultant, Hammond, Collier & Wade - Livingstone Associates, Inc., has prepared a total project cost estimate for the relocation of City facilities for the Cedar River Park and Liberty Park in conjunction with Metro's proposed relocation of its Cedar River Pipeline in the vicinity of 1-405 and the two City park sites. The estimated cost for these improvements is $640,000. The estimate is conservative and includes estimated total construction cost, construction contingency, State sales tax, engineering/inspection, and administration/legal. Due to the limited time and information available to prepare this estimate, the cost provided is very preliminary and shall be considered a guideline to help Metro secure funding for this project only at this time. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at Ext. 6212. METR-CST/DMC:If W W W W W W xxx Nf ka0 coo AM!!O �N ^lY a aa ! er er e+ M N CI �a �i dy � w ;r 7 rw_ zoo mm m 1W&moo Al -I 13 ° - 9"e, c we- \3 fo Co r, r, . n-A</e ex. .x x .. AJC—W BGDCj, SrOIJAE 611 Y/ ta "II r I I kl v �l Tic. e•r �II -r E-- Atli {{`' FA:"' , �.V•�Gt/�`l�,)�'�. \C:=j�� .- AA vr WO Je GUMG INN /�o Fsicc' Q 1 IL ! . . I ao A /79:�C W W W W W W coo N N N NOO C vaa /!/G�1 t7w ir MAY 1 ' 91 10: 55 FROM HCW-L CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept. TELEFAX COVER SHEET DELIVER TO: NAME V4% V&P CA I"I 'S'6"9h '!V0001- - - FIRM v h LOCATION &M�/•a %� TELEFAX NO. 1z :5 1 __ Z 1513 SENT FROM: NAME Jo h ji 64w Wro HAMMOND, COLLIER & WADE - LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. 4010 Stone Way North Seattle, Washington 98103-8090 TELEFAX NO.: (206) 632-0947, Automatic Receive Day/Night CONFIRMATION NO.: (206) 632-2664, Cindy Russell or Michelle fact Total number of pages transmitted, including this cover sheet: S If you do not receive all of these pages, please call the confirmation number as soon as pos- sible. Thank you. Comments Date Transmitted: 45.- 1.- 411 - HAMMOND, COLLIER & WADE - LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. w ,F - 40G, C-J i v l I w 17. ra 04 ?1 31 LL E• g ~ .• 1 OCA Ll IT; U gc+ hex 1r�. tu.re r�i _ �s,� rr,�i 5•fwt, rFiaC . Le ENGINEER`S ESTIMATE OWNER: City of Renton PROJECT: Metro 42" Interceptor I-405 Relocation A. Liberty Park Improvements No. ITEM I Mobilization & Demobilization 2 Restoration & Cleanup 3 Temporary Construction Fencing 4 Crushers :urf6Cing 5 Select Backfill 6 Pipe Bedding 7 Temporary Cold Patch 8 Asphalt Pavement Patch, CL B 9 8-inch DI Sewer Main w/ Poly., In Place 10 12-inch DI Sewer Main w/ Poly., In Place 11 Type I 48-inch die. Manholes, In Place 12 Connection to Existing S. Cedar River Park Improvements No. ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL Lump Sum LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Lump Sum L$ $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2000 LF $5.00 $10,000.00 60 TON $10.00 $600.00 840 TON $9.00 $7,560.00 7DO LF MOD $2,100.00 150 TON $50.00 $7,SOO.00 200 TON $55.00 $11,ODO.00 700 LF $32.00 $22,400.00 1300 LF $36.00 $46,800.00 10 EA $2,000,00 $20,000.00 1 EA $1,300.00 $1,300.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $149,260.00 ESTIMATED UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE 1 Mobil'zation & Demobilization Lump Sum LS $10,000.00 2 Excavation 75 CY $15.00 3 Restoration & Cleanup Lump Sum LS $10,000.00 4 Temporary Construction Fencing 1500 LF $5.00 5 Crushed Surfacing 20 TON $10.00 6 Select Backfill 100 TON $9.00 7 Pipe Bedding 800 LF $3.00 8 Temporary Cold Patch 247.5 TON $50.00 9 Asphalt Pavement Patch, CL B 330 TON $55.00 10 Shoring Lune Sum LS $10.000.00 11 8-inch DI Sewer Main wl Poly., In P':ce 300 LF $32.00 12 Type 148-inch dia. Manholes, In F e 12 EA $2,000.00 13 84" Concrete Wet Well w/ Lid Lurp Sum LS $6,900.00 14 4" D.I. (Cl 52) Forcemain w/ Poly. & Viton 1000 LF $23.00 15 4" Gate Valve 3 EA $400.00 16 Air/Vacuum Valve w/ Vault & Restoration Lump Sum LS $1,000.00 17 O.I. Water Main Fittings Soo LB $1.25 18 Connection to Existing 1 EA $1,300.00 19 Duplex Pumping System Lump Sum LS $50,000.00 20 Telemetry, Controls & Misc Instrumentation Lump Sum LS $8,000.00 21 Electrical '-a - al) Lu.•r sum Lt $7,000.00 ES: ,=D CONS'.;OCTION COST TOTAL EST. CONSTRUCTION COST 30% CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY STATE SALES TAX (8.1%) ENGINEERING & INSPECTION (20%) ADMIN & LEGAL TOTAL $I0.000.00 h V - $1,125. \V $1D,00 .00 D $7, 0.00 0 00.0 300.0 $ ,400.00 $ 2,375.60 $ 8,150.00 $1 ,OD0.00 $24,000.00 $6,900.00 $23,000.00 $1,200.DO $1,000.00 $750.00 $1,300.00 $50,000.00 $8.000.00 $7,000.00 00 $370,660.00 $111,198.00 $39,030.50 $9E,371.60 $10,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE $627,260.10 ** TOTAL PAGE.003 ** 24 003 01/06/" BILL 4 19.98 4.90 10.45 70.65 G -- o- i �.ffi- 35 33 0 1/ 1 6/e9 PI -IT 1 9. 98 4! - 1 .4 - 02/03/ee ADJ 19.90 4.90 10.4S 35.33 a O /1v / M 1 - 4. - I .4 - 4 03/OI/99 PMT 26.70- 5.43- 11.59- 0 / /- 03/27/e9 n3/3 1 /99 RE/T R£/T 19.96 19 9g- 4.90 4 90-IIL�`�5- 10.45 43.72 03/31/89 RE/T 1 I B _ 39 49oiF 04/03/99 BILL 37 55.98 20.13 42.94 162.77 / 4 / 1 i L L 39 iiii- 2?o2 I 4 � -4 . O - 05/31/e9 PMT 114.04- 41.34- 86.18- WWI; 4 4 49 L 70 . R S; !;i 08z07/89 BILL 2S3 260.62 137.73 . 293.74 1016.10 - - 4- 79.00- 09// 05/99 HILL T�.5;0 09/20/89 PP__MLLT 69 42.49- 8;!0- 16.26- 37.53- 34.79- 766.65 I � 1/PATL 80.L5- 973.59 II/06/e9 12/06/89 BILL BILL 72 92.3e 39.20 83.60 215.18 76 96.54 41.35 88.19 441.26 24 003 01/08/90 BILL 739 89 118.42 69.83 114.78 744.29 02/07/90 BILL 853 114 147.92 89.21 146.98 1128.40 Il3/n7/9n HILL 965 1 12 145g6 87 64 144.37 15ns97 03/15/90 PMT 600.62- 327.23- 577.92- 04/09/90 BILL PHT 1090 125 160.90 97.67 161.19 61 9- 131H4 419.76 OS/04/90 BILL 1198 10 I40ti4. Fe 1 364.65 05/15/90 PMT 140.84- 64.57- 139.24- n6/n8/90 BILL 1387 189 2736-42 147.21 243.68 627.31 06/15/90 PMT 236.42- 147.21- 243.68- _ 07z06z9O BILL 1466 81 108.98 63.69 104.43 277.10 n7/16/90 PMT 108_,98- 63.69- 104,43- 08/02/90 HILL 1567 99 130.22 77.61 127.64 335.47 08/15/90 PMT 130.22- 77.61- 127.64- 09/1o/9n Bill 139 177.42 10 615.12< PMT 77.42- 121.96 i09/14/90 - 179.18- 10/03/90 BILL 1796 92 72.15 116.65 312.76 Io/I5/9n PMT 121 96- 72 15- 118.65- 11/05/90 HILL 1911 113 146.74 84 8.4 145.69 380.87 11/16/90 PMT 146.74- 88.44- 145.69- 4 12/17/90 PMT 147.92- 89.21- 14 .9 - ►-�tl -Cl C 4✓�CO 24 004 0 1 /09/89 LATE / / 01/16/89 PHT 13.68- 4.90- 10.45- 02/Og/89 HILL `f 13 88 4 QQ IQ,45 29.23 / / - - - 03/06/89 BILL 48 61.32 26.11 55.69 143.12 03/IS/89 61.32- 26,11- 55169- / / R; 04/03/89 BILL 15 26.20 6.13 17.45 22.55 05/04/89 BILL IS 26.2Q 13 . 175 _ 74.33 / / - So+ - 06/06/89 BILL 17 28.44 9.21 19.75 57.40 e 9 - 771.46 � / / LL 22 .44- 2 . 07/19/89 PHT 34.04- 11.95- 25.49- 08/07i89 BILL 30 31 _ 93.74 /I / b - b. - �- �4.79 - 09/05/89 BILL 7 17.24 4.90 10.455 32.59 T 1 0. S9 / / � 5 3 10/19/89 PHT 20.60- 5.43- 11.59- I 9 Ig 4@ 4 . QQ I Q . 45 -- 34.83 - - - 12/OS/89 BILL 15 26.20 6.13 17.45 51.78 IZ/I5/89 PHT 26 20- @ 1 13- 17,45- Z04 01/08/"0 BILL 25QR 22 34.�6 18.04 2E3.33 80g� 01/12/90 PHT 34. b- 18.04- 26.33- 02/07/90 BILL 2618 20 32.20 16.47 25.81 74.48 / / - I 47- I- 03/07/90 BILL 2627 I I 11.6 3 3 03/15/90 PHT 19.22- 8.01- 11.60- Il4/09/90 BILL 2645 18 2`' 84 14.5)7 23 20 68 01 04/13/90 PHT 29.64- 14.97- 23.20- 05/04/90 BILL 2656 II 21.58 9.51 14.21 45.30 4 - 06/08/90 BILL 2671 15 26. 1 .6 I 4 58.29 06/15/90 PHT 26.30- 12.65- 19.34- 07/06/90 BILL 20 32.20 16.47 25 81 74 48 07/16/90 PHT 32.20- 16.47- 25.81- 08/02/90 BILL 2704 13 23.94 11.08 16.72 51.74 0�/IS/90 --�rL PHT 23,94- 11.08- 16.72- 0 5, / 1 0/ 9 L 'i 16 27.4a 13.40 20 . 59 b 1 7 09/14/90 PHT 27.48- 13.40- 20.59- .4 10/03/90 BILL 2727 7 �.66 6.85 . 9. 33.38 10/15/90 PHT i b 6.8 - b67 - II/OS/90 BILL 2738 11 21.58 9.56 14.18 45.32 ll/16/90 PHT 9.56- 14,18- 12/03/90 BILL 2752 14 2 IL 11.88 18.05 55.05 12/17/90 PHT 25.12- 11.88- 18.05- A- `l CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1992 TO: Dave Chri ens FROM: s orns SUBJECT: Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Alternative Routes The Water Utility has reviewed the 6 relocation route alternatives and has the following concerns/comments: 1. The preferred relocation routes would be North 3rd Street, North 4th Street, or North 5th Street. These routes are preferred because they are the greatest distance from the City's production wells and closer to the outside boundary of the APA. Allowing more distance provides the City with more options and time for detecting a leak/spill and containing or cleaning up an incident with minimal impact to the City's water supply system. 2. The Water Utility has much concern about the utilidor alternative. We feel that construction of this alternative while maintaining aquifer protection would be very difficult. The current alignment of the trunk runs very close to the City's production wells. We would prefer to have the trunk relocated as far from the wells as possible. If this route is selected, the utilidor should start at the entrance of Cedar River Park and continue to the manhole at the intersection of North 1st and Wells Ave N at a minimum. In addition, the Water Utility would expect to heavily involved in the development of the aquifer protection and construction plans for this project. 3. The routes on Bronson Way and North 2nd provide very little additional distance away from the City's production wells than currently exists. Since the trunkline is being relocated, we would like the line reconstructed as far from the City's production wells as possible (i.e. at the furthest reaches of APA zone 1 or outside of the APA) V E F c 11 I. 5�(. . a� \` v `3 Z,1� ,% `lP .I / Y S'(. " '� 6 \v, _ I __ . � 7-3 - - "'� ir _�� 0 r C \\ - V V% 5 c 3Ro vV It [- 9 % v� 3 s ,t 1 o V., • MAPLE '� I I �S I l'':"` INT ALLEY -( �,( �,-�'� vG - Z N ERCHANGE . \ o� 2 - �$'` 2 F r z _ _ 'L 2 F •9 , - - 3 20 t^ S �,' .�, N 2 Ot ,,, _ V: / t \ ZNo I t7 _ a0 '\ Y r I <I � N G y 2. S�' �`" f ,,r,1 yw �I<� R I 2 0 c I �2 3 23 k 9 , Y � jI I� I •tip. I �- , a�, 1 EAST SIDE 9G C/�.A w G INTERCEPTOR o 9 N r j "': G qG S� 2' Z 169 g SECTION 1 t�` ZNO g ` •�.� y 4 (CONT1 61-4) h N• I O \ ,r / r ? 2� a �.:.' ,Z� 3Q LIBERTY z CEDAR RIVER PARK --/ l �N I I/ 6 PARK / - � . r - q � co A 1' 3' ! r �� la 2 3 , 0 - 5 '� ` ST P 1p f 10 2 I o a D` , "I 21 i 3 i 60,. 0- z �� "._ 2. l IiII ; 3 1ET ;iiiX�\ 11\I �\N% �11, .p I� k '. /_E____...''__ .... �_ ... �-I ----R—---, _� . 0 400 200 400 600 \ ,q DR /� - pR1�E ��� s} CEDARRIVER 'S-' t405 `` 1 1 �%" '� ��- TRUNK- SECTION 1 %�` �` �' .�1 / 1' v �.1 '1�1 (CONT. 62-2) %\ N' .'�! --�'` f C'/O-.f 1F=200) � �^ \ r 4.07 e ti1 \ .........I.......•• .: ,, . ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... : I://r. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .........�......... ....... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... �.......:' :��J::::: :....::....::...l:%1.1 :::::::: I: ::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ....••..• .•.•............ 2:.....................I.........;.......................................................�............... , ,. �...... ::::::::: :::::::::I:::::::: : ......... ......::: ::::::::: :::...... ........ ........ .. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ,..:: ::.. ::::::::�::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: .... .,�. e• I.........�......... �, ......... ......... ......... ......... ......I. ......... ......... ......... .. .. r ..... .............................•......................................... .......................•_...... :0. ..................................................................................................................•..w................ ....•....................................•........ ...•....•..............""................................................................•................................................................................................•......................................................................... fig...... ................... ......•.. ... ..... .....• ......... .... ......... ......... >; ...... 3...... ........ ......... ........• ...:::::. :........ ...... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......•.. .......,. ......... ......... ........ ....... ••.•••... •••.. p�....... ......... :::::::::}:::::::::':::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::...... ....... ......... ......... .•.... ..•...... ... ......... .........I......... ......... ......... ......... . ............................................•.•....................................., .. ::::........... ..............................I........................................... .••.•..• ::::::::::... y�: :' ,:�►::::..... ::::::;:::::::::!:::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::....... ::::::.......... ......... a ........................ ........ ........................... .......................... .................. :��: :::::::::......:......... ....I........- I.........:::::::.....::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: �. . .................................................................................................................................................................._..... ;� o «.................... I.. ......... ......... .. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......::: ......... .......•. .•...••.• •..•..... «........................................ ..... •••••. . ..... ......... ... ... I ...... ....... ......... .. ......... ......... ......... ..... ....... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ..... ...... ......... b .•.. ::::::: ::::::::: :::::: A- ::::::: :::...... ........ ...... ......l, ......... e1. ......•.. ..••..... ::1::....... ....................... .... ......... ............................................................................................................................... ::':: ... ' .. , . ... .... .... .... .................................................................... .......:::::::::::::::.....:: :. . :1D ;l..... ��I//s :::. ...... . .... /. .... :: c 1/4//`� .. iw ::::: ::::::::: ....... ::::::... ::::::::: :: L:G' . �1 Y" .. ......... ....:4� . ' ... . ::: : `''/.. g • . .. . a/ : .z �: •� .." . . . . .. . ... ..... . . . . .. %V�I . ri s ... Fg �y G: - . 0.� - /1/. �Z�: %> yc7% y 5� �. -. .. . e..........................................•.............................•... ..... ,. ' , ,. , . ..... ..� ....... ,. f ............... i5 ......=.........................................I............................ ...�,, {� , rr� ................:C o ..........w..« ........w...... w............... �Ye ......... .....-.......-........... ...................•....... ..•a .................... :2.Bd............. ' �,i :.....,�................ :'�." w«........... 7" w....«... .....................•. ........1.gp.•.,- .. .....«... ... • . . r.. ...................................... : ..... ........ ................. 4 ... �: �.._ ... . ••.: .... .... .. 1. :3... .••• .t� �i •••.:'::: ..•... • • ...•.• •........ ......... ......... ....•.... ,,...... .... ...•..... ...-....-.. ...... .::•..... ,: . . ..•... .... ......... .......•. �. ...... ......... ......... ......... ""�2E � '::: %S. .........•. 0 �....... ......... ......... ::::: ....... ........ z....... '`......Y. C .... 2 2 "v! . ... ..... �' ......... ......... .... ........• ....... ... •..•..•.• :`� ....:::.: ::.:::::. .::::: . . �): : : : :: ...... ......... . .... .. ..... ........ . ... .. .... ........ . .. ..... . .. , r' .......... «....._........• :: :: .:. .. ......... ... . ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ..1..... .... .......�............... �r ' . •••••.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................. I b 4 w.•...•.«....•.................... ...............«........... w.. «....:...... :::::: ::::::: ::::;:::: ::..... ...... ...... ......... ........ .........:..... ......... ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::':::: ::::::::: ...... . . ......... ......... ...... :::::::: .I:::: ......... ::::::... ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::. ::::::... ::::::::: :::::::::I :::::::: :::::::::::::::::: :.... ................:::::::::......:::::::::: :::::: ::::::......:::: ::::::.... ......:::::::•::•....... I.........::::::::::::::I:::::':::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::. ...... - ..:: :I:::: ::::::... ::::::... ::::::... ......::: ::::::. ::::::... ......::: ::::::... ......::: ......... ::::....• :::::::::::::::::•••..... ..... ................•..I.....:::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::: \z�:9'�; ,...............I................•..................•.................. ......... r l�J t� r! �. ....... ....... /50 ,C o i k cv ................................I.......................................................... ................ e ................. .. ............�1.... �............... ......_........ ................. « y ....................................................................... ........•...•.......... ... ............•............................................. �- D «.....«.................. •... ...... ...... ...... + �' ::.:::::: ......... ::::::::: ::::::... Ir::::::. ......... ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::.. ...I.... ......... N........ ........ ::::::::i . . ....... :::......:::.:. ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: II::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::I''''*:::: :........ I......... ::::::::....•...•::::::I:::::::::::::::..::.::::::::::::::::::..... ' ............................... ...•.• �,................ I......... ..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :o:`....::::::::::::::::::::::::........................ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: t::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::::::...... ......... �,.............................................................. w....w................ .... ......... .. I� ... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ........................... ow........«.................... ......... I , ........ . _w......... ,�\...... _ -_- ......... ......... . � ...... . ........ . • . . . • • . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . • • • —I., .. « ... •.••.••.. .......•. ...••.... .•• �_ ......... ......... ... .• � .' ......... '...... ......... ......... .........I.......•. ......... . • • • • • • • • • • : . . . • • . • ' ' . • . . . . . . . . . . , ! • , . . . . . . • . • . . . • • • • • • 1 d. I . . . . • . . . . . . . . . • • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • • . . • . • . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . i/•//'+� .... ......... ......... ......... . ....•.... ......•.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ✓ � • . {� . ,i .kr.•+' / .� . / ! i /¢ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1'.1 0 ................ww«w.«w. ....w...w..«............... ............................... ................................................................. ... ........ ....... .. ........ . ..;... .•...•.•. ......... ......... •........ ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::. ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ..... .•. :::t� ... .:::::::: ::::::::: ..:°�• ::::::::: ......... ......... ...:::::: ::::::::: ::::::::::::::: :::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ......... ::::::::: ::::::::: ......::: ::::::::: ......::. :::.::::: ::::::::: ::::::... ......::: :::...... ......... ......... ......... ......... r rt^ �fi j /2 . . . = '.J.C% .. I...................................•........................ «............ .......................................................................... ............_......•................................................................................................................................... w «. _..................... .... . 110 «.................... ..................... ..................... (........ l7 . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ..«,.........«w.««.:.• ...w «I..........•.•..«......•...: ...«•«..... • • • • • • • • • • • ' • • • • • �� Vr • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . e.:.. ....::... ::::::::: :::::.... ........ /...... .. l/' `ie• ........ ......... ......... ......... .. ......... ......... ......... .......:: :::::::......:: ::::..... ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::�::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .... - � 6 le, /0 ,-2--' ,y i6 I% zv L2 t`L Z� -ir M 3Z 3� 36 ELEVATION 0 Q ,OR 100 0 , N D' , EQUALS MEAN bAD LEVEL• 1929 a = M l T R (3 Mun I e i pal. I ty of Metropol. I tan Seattle — I U.SIC.t 6.5.(ADJUSTED 19�7) , , 0 0 i DRAWN. CHECKED, SCALE. FILE N0� �'E oA 1 _ /-,,, t'C,. 7'1(: 4-- /,�C ,i2 640 C,4 T iO N Y 7s Z;) 6(,)C� IVO'TF40 DRAWING N0� z RECOMMENDED J w CONTRACT NOi r_ w COORDINATES R BEARINGS ARE APPROVED SHEET N0� OF BY [LATE BASEO ON MASH1Nr10nIN I01lE - I I o N0� REVISION MDIIIAIE SY. w-4I- - . -------- r i 1 `� �' ----- - I A 8 \ lb \ . .-N1 Q7 C) I .?" -) �_ I ) , 41 `z C) 7 0 1 \ 0) ­_�� *_11 \ 0 �, I, q lir/ 7 �) 'I- \ V7 , � ��11�', , , _____ :"--.\ -10 I ,*..... . �, 17 1 _p ..... . .. .. I7/_ 1. I <0 . . . � A 1�. *.-.' *. 1. ,11,01 1 1�14 .. ... .. \V % .. *-,. A '�,_ . �\ 15,fo, \ . 64 I I --- __ I ___ I I I MFN�� F11114FIR91010117 . [) A __ F A F __A__ G A 1`1 rc �,� ,--- 1\(_)'_�� -.,\ "�� ",_,� v ,,��O, \(,A ,��, '7()4 1 , \ I 1­111 " % 11 . d�,_- "�J, I I () , "v. 01 le-7- , 0 0 � " . 11 q . Is . -11 I "N' . 19-7 1 . . 1. I ,�- 1-1 S1__ ". 11---' "I, � ,, , I I . "I ,r* 17- - N \ . 01 1��_ � I , , , \ , , I I I , , I I \ \ , &A fxf, I \ " UNIMPROVED AREAS PAVED AREA$- - w 40 - __ d3 �� w _17 4"CL.B ASPH.CONC.. a_ 0 E Z: 4" AT 13 IUJ P Of TACK COAT J: ' Z: Uj rr c\j �_ It / 1 _________7 _.. . 1� . - - - ..' - --�- '...... .. ... ......., ... . . C, , a 4 "_... -4 �j . - T". [ . - " . I . . 1. . , - CL.C1 SUBSEQUENT I I . .0 . : 0. -12" �, . . 0. : , I . : . i . CL. B SUBSEQUENT \ RACKFILL (TYP) ,�� '. '. 6 . 0 . BACKFILL(TYP) ... , , 0 .. . . .. . .. , . . ,,--SIDE SLOPES , 0 ", 0. 11 CONTRACTORS OPTION . . I . .� . � ­ . . . . , . I . . 10. - , - - 8 MIL POLYETHYLENE � , .0 2'- 0 M I N. VER T I C , A L ----i 1, . '.. . . ENCASEMENT (TYP) . TRENCH ... V� , . - 2" . . .. - __ . 0 _jj _ , '. .. . 1�!:.. . ... .... FILTER FABRIC WHFRE--­,N1::11, . - 1- I/ REQb . . .. . - 1- ­ I CL.Al BEDDING AND P., ... . : . .:,. .­". . f INITIAL BACKFILL(TYP) - - - ... _.. , \ O.D.+ 2'-O MIN. - I _� I 1c. 1,5x I.D.4- 2'-O MAX. - I (TYP Bori-i SECTIONS) Stm I -(;ON FINED I 11 Y\ '....., �'_' - \\ ), I Z \ 4r� � � 'r \ \ _____� 4 CL. B ASPH. CONC. �! R� \ � ,t .� \\ A ec\ 1� """" N \ Z ,- 10 � �1' . �, f - It I I A" AT 0 ", .... . 73 N, 7 W), I -, I "v 1 . Z' 0 10 � T . . , - // - � \V I . 0 -0 I,,\ _,_� \-ok \ \\ �� \\ , , , . I...*. I I \ tp . . .. T� ,4�f - , I - -A . 1. 0, 11 PW-3 . _R`10�11 (EXIST.) EAST SIDE " , I � k � TN (Ir" 10 0 : ,, . , I IV\ . \ - I x 9 Pw_9 1169 , * ... *,-.�:...:f....,...-,...-..*...-- �� - -ir- - -- - --I---- ____-I 1 4 1 btf,,Ilvl,4 -1 k i- I I &I 1� . ,=. . ..... . . __ 1 5 1 It � � .0 0 . . (CONT 61- 4) . I %, _�, v f< Zz. ­ . . * I tA. CL.C1 SURSEQUENT-­,,,. - - I ' .0'. Ir , I 1� \ "c') t1P . . . . . t - \ __ RFACKFILL (TYP) . 0, I *..- �� '** * " �� . �� , ,� / , k S t% - "'� 011', _� -4, .. " k- " . ..0', .. . , ,I. � I . . ,$-- � I- .I- I <r f � __�_ __1 . 0.1 -, - __",,�� , 1511fol 17 1�1 ""', >. / . . . I - , . . . 0. - _�� _� . I" I . 'I- I - Y *, I . . I ___ ___ \ 1� - ,- I BE RJ 7 C E DA R RIVER PARK 1�,/ . . .1.0.: `ftqw. � (:I ',"_ . .. I ___ k 11�1 PARK " / . 0 * -, *. ,� . . \ ` - _� It 1p I -, . a.: ,`��SYSTEM AS REQD - __ . JI ... co � . . .. .. : " __. I- 1,S7- ?!� lf� 0,, I A_ ,----' , "'. -.1. , - .,.: , I *_... �: ___ ?I �i - I., ......... * I—, �..:`,_ .. -,.,:: co __ Q� \ "---' :4,. S� .1p" 1) ?!; . ,, -1 . * "."*.. cl) Z/ I I - - 71 1w_ I rr. I I I ..... .,Tf / \ " S7- , %, ." 11 :-*'." ... :. _� I \ 1�1 .... :,.,*.,. 4 \ \_0 \ � - -_ �_ _�, 7 0 _",6 Nq- ;,.... .-.".*. ";: I ___ 0.7 mi - - --i". ----- ap- ,z 1_� 1: / cr Pw_8 S. , / IV. W -_ N CD w �1 11-11' ,p,� ",,-TCF-PENETRATION I$,D� - �__ -_ -_ -_ -_ co U) - 11 1-1 1-1 ,A_11_� " AS RMD,T0 SUIT - L__RI I _� I j I_. - 0 1 1 GROUND CONDITIONS - ___ ____ _ "',RftE 1"k ___ .".1, �, I- _/ ­�. -, T_ - ", I iy- p D ___�'_�_ _� tp ,-- - F - ___ N _� --- 1_� S. I":, I - --- :3 \ �.� "---' - - 1-11 1_� VERTICAL \, - c --_. - ___� DRIVE -� � --- C 1� --- ­ -1 405 - '61 11 1-11 1_1� \ 400 6CO .. _- / _____ ___�_, � DAR RIVER "I -co _,�, 1-11 t ___... I TRUNK- SECTION I 0 I � , "_=%;_m�!!!1!!!!!!!! mlilm� .__ I R_ I- "' * I \1. .1 )�Y_ \ - (CONT 62-2) 1 ____ - ,,, 1_� ___ - - A I . -_ , ,f�E ET r%' I 1\ . . 8 / V I .0 / _00 I 1_� __ , T P 97 KI r W (Z P rT I r) KI Q %I - r-w ____�_ ... . \, __ '. 3 3 IN: NW! B NEISEC.17-23-5 \ .. ------ � ... ____1... ___�____... r- L. 1A 114 - %, I - I : I __I� - ::;:-_� ----=.r- . @ =�Z_ : 1 " = : 2-00' 1 - ! ! I I i ! i : : I ! I ! I ! . : : : : ; : ......... ..... : ......... : ......... ! ......... 1- ..... .: ... ..... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... 1 ...... .... : ........ 1: ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ..... . I ....... : ......... : ........ I ; ... � ... : ......... : .... __, ; - : I I I * I , I * * : * I I , 1 PW-1/20 I ........ : ... 11 ..... : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . : : : : : : : .... : ......... : - - - - 1 ......... : . . . . . . .� ....... : ...... .. : .... I .... : . I ....... : .. ...... : ........ I : - - .... f__ - ......... : ......... : .... .... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... 1 ......... i ......... : ......... : ......... : ...... I : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : : : . : : . . ; : : : : : : . . : ; : : : - : ! : : : : ..... : ............. ..... ! ......... : ......... : ., . I I I I � I .... ..... i ......... : 1. -..: ......... :.1 .... .. ­....: - . : : ....... ... .. ­:� ........ : ... I ..: ......... : ......... : ......... % ......... . � . � ., .* * � , , :: � * ....... : ......... : ......... I ......... : . . . - : I ........ : I - - I : : : : : . .1 ! : : : : : : : ! : : : : : : : : : : - : ! : i ..... :... . ..: ......... :1 .. : ... * .: ... .... :1 ..: .. ...... : ......... : .... .....: ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : . ............. ... : ..... ... : ........ 1: ......... : ..... ... . ....... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ... ...... . I....:, ** .1-:11 ... *,*,:,,* : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : � : ; : : : : : i : i ......... ; ...... ...: .. ..... ......... : ........ 1: ......... :... ...... : ......... : ......... : : ......... ; ......... : ... ..... : .... ..: ......... : ...... : . ....: .... .....: ...... .. : ......... : ... _...: ......... : ......... : ......... ; .......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : : : : , ** '­ : : : : : : : : : : : : . I : : : : - : : : i . : .i ...... I : ......... : : ......... : ...... .. : ......... : ......... ......... � ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ;-� .. .: ....... : ......... ! ......... : .... .... i ... ..... :1 ...... : ......... : ... I ... .... :_ .... 1. .. : ......... : ......... :... ...... ......... t ......... : � .... . : ... � .... 1 ..... . I : : : : : ! ; ......... i . ....... : ......... : ........ : ... : : : : : : * : . : : : : : :, - ..... I ......... : : : : ...... I.. . . .. ...... : .... I-: ..... I ... :., ....... : ....... . : ......... :­ ...... : ......... : ......... ;­ ....... : ......... ...... ; ......... ; ......... ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ; .... : 11 * I I I I * I : I * ....... ! ... : : : : : : : : *. : : : : : : : i : : : : : : : : : :: ......... : ...... I . : ......... : ......... i ......... : ........ : ......... : .... � .. : ......... : ......... : ......... ......... : ......... : .... � .... I ......... : : ....... ­: ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ... .... :�: ... **,: ......... :­­**­: ......... :.., ...... : ......... : ......... : : : : : 1 ....... � ; .......... . : : ! : : : : : : : � : .. : : : : : : : : ... : ......... : : : .. ; ......... ! ......... ; ......... ....... : ........ ..... ; ......... : ........ 1: ... ............... : ......... : ...... :.. ..... I ......... 1 ......... ! ......... I ......... : .... .. ; : : : . : , ! I : : : : : : : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ...... ­.­* ... '': ! ... *** ... !'­ . 1 ......... I ......... I ......... ....... : .... ; : : : : � ...... I ......................... : : ................................ im ...................................... i.- � ................................... I ... : ................................... r ...................................... ! ............... I ................... I ... ! ....................................... ! ... .... .............................. r ...................................... ......... � ...................................... r ...................................... r ...................................... r ........................... . ...... . . . . ...... ! ................. I ..................... ; ....................................... ; ............... . ­ ......... . ; .................... I .................. ...................................... i ....................... * ............... i- ..................................... r ...... . r ............................. ............ r ...................................... r .......... ........................... r .................................. .. . . I .... -.1 ........... I : - ................................. i � ...................... r : : : : . : : * : ....................................... : .............. I ......... 11 ............. r ................ ......... . .,. I . : : : . . : ......... : ... I . . I . . : ......... : I ........ : ......... : ........ : ................... : ......... : ......... ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... i ......... : ......... : ..... : ......... : ................... : ... I ..... : ....... ; ......... : ......... :­ ... ­:, ... ­­:''.. ..... : ...... . : . : : : ......... : ......... : .... : : : *. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . . . ..... : ......... : ......... : ..... . . ......... ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ................... .: ................... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ......... : ......... : ......... .......... : ... .... : ......... ! ... ... : . . . I : . : ! * , * ... * , : 1. � : : : : : : : : : : : : *. : : : : : : : : : : ; : . I . . .... i ......... : - � ....... : ... ..... : ......... : .................... � ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ! ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ....... . I . ....... : ......... : ......... : ..... : .. � --! ......... : ......... : ......... : ..... : : : . : : : : : t : : : : : : : 1. ; . : : - : : : : . : : ......... : ......... :. - ..... : ......... : ......... : ......... ; ......... : ......... : ... I ..... :... . ..: ......... : . ....... ::**,*.. ............ ;*­* .... :�' -1-1: ....... 11:111,111*1:11'' .... 1:1*11 ..... : ......... : ......... : .. ..... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ........ 1: ......... : : : : : % : 1. : : : : : : : 1: ... : : . : ; : : : I : * : : ........ : .......... ..., .... ...... : ......... :1 ........ : ......... : ......... :.1 ....... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... :, .... ! ....... � :-: ... ­.: .......... : . i : : : : : : : : ; : 1. : : : : : . : : *. : : 4 ......... : ... � ..... : - ..... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : I ......... I ........ : - .. � .... : ....... . : I ....... : .... .... I ......... i .......... � .... : ­ ...... : ......... ; : ....... : . ....... : ......... 1 ......... : ......... I ......... :­­ ... i ........ I i ......... 1 ......... : ...... ... i ......... Pool : : : : : : : : : : : : : ! . i : : ! : : : : . : : I : : . ; ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ..... ... : ......... : ..... ... : .... 1. . .:1 ......... : ... : ......... 1 ........ : ......... f ......... ! . .. :111, *1 ,:111'', .......... ; ......... ... .: ......... : .... .... ....... . : : ......... ! ......... : ......... I ......... : ......... : ......... ......... : - .... : : ': : : : : : : : : : : ; : : . : : ; : : : : ..... ...... : ... .... : 5 .... I .............. ........ . . . ...... - : ......... ...... I.. ........ : .. : ......... : .......... : ...... . : ......... ! . ....... : ......... : ....... r. : - I ..... : - - . : ......... : ... :... - :4 . ..... : . : . ...... : ... ..... : .......... : ... . ....... : ......... : ......... : ...... ... t ......... .: ­­­ . : : : : : : : : : i : : : : : : : : : ! ! : : .. : : . ..i ......... ....... ..i ......... : ......... ; . ....... i ...... ...: ......... : ........ 1: ......... : ......... : ......... I ......... 1 ......... I ....... : ......... 1 ......... : ......... ; ......... 1 ......... :* ........ : ......... I ......... 1 ....... **3'** .... . :11 i I'll, : I : 1 ......... i ......... ......... : ......... i ......... . : � : : : : : : : . ..... : . ....... : . ; . 4 ...................................... � ...................................... 1- .................. !"', ........ " -: : : : . . . .......... - I ......... ...................................... r ...................................... r., � . ............................ r ...................................... r . ................................ ! .. . ........................... r ...................................... t ...................................... ! ................. � ............ - - -!. - - . .................. ! ..................................... r ...................... .1 ..................................... . : ..... i ......... : ..... .... ...................................... ! . .................................... ! ....................................... ! .......................... . : *. : .............. I . . I .... ­­­­­­* ....... - - . .............. I ....................... !­* .... ­**­******­­** .......... r ................ � ..................... r ...................................... r ...................................... r i ........ I ......... I .................... I .................................... --i ....................................... t *11-11-11-1-1--l", I . ..... ; ................... : ......... : ......... : ........ I : ... I .... i ......... : . I � � ..... : ................... ! ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : . ....... i ......... i ......... : ......... : ......... ! ......... : ..... ............. : .......... : ....... . ......... : ......... : ......... : .... . : : : i : : : I ........ : : : : ; : : : : : : : : : : : ... : ......... : ......... : ... I .... : ......... .: ......... ! ......... ......... .... ......... : ......... : ......... : .......... : ......... :­ ...... : ......... : ......... ......... : .... . � .......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : APPROX., F:UTURE .COr4c;T ....... . ! : : : : : : : : : : : : � : : : : : : : : ; _� : . : : : ... *­­1­1 ....... I .... .. . : ......... : ......... : ......... ; ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... 1 .... ... : ........ : ... I .... 1: ...... - : ......... ! ......... : ...... .... ... ..... ......... ... � ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... 1 ......... : ......... i­ ... ­: !****'***' ......... : ; :1111111*1:1111 1 I ...... . : : : : : . : : : : .... : ......... : ......... : ......... ..., .... :1 ....... 1: ......... : ...... 1.1: ......... .... : ......... : ......... : ... ..... i ......... : ..... : :11'', . : : I * I I * , * . . . // 1. - : : ! : : ..... I ......... i ......... ! ......... : : : : : � : : : : : : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ; ......... : ......... :1 ........ : ......... : ......... : ................... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ...... : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ..... ....... I . . . ............. � - . I . : ......... 1 ......... : ..... .. I, ......... : .... . ..: ......... ! ......... : ......... : ......... 1 ......... : ......... : ......... : .. ...... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ; .... : .......... 1 ......... : .... I ......... : ....... .... : : : . . P* � R' O' )X. * . 11. : I I '' . : . . i : : : : : : : : ; ! : . It ......... t ..... : .., I ......... ! ......... ! ......... : ......... . . : ......... : .... .... : ......... : .......... : ....... 1. : ......... : ......... : ......... 1 .. -A E-N-IST-CONST.: .. . i ......... : ......... : ......... I ...... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : .... : : .. . I I . ..... I .. : : : ...... : : : : i : : , : : ... : ......... : ... ...... : .................... : ... I ..... : ...... . : I ......... .. i ..... : ......... : ... : : : .. .... i.- : : : !I ........ i ......... I ....... . .... :,**, ..... i ......... i ......... ......... : ......... : ......... : ... ­'. .! ......... : ......... : ......... i ......... 1 ........ : ... ....... : ....... . : ......... : ......... 1 ......... 1 ... . . : : : : : . : . : : � : : : : ...... : ......... : ......... : : : : : : : .. : : ......... : ......... : ......... : ....... . : ....... . : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ............... � ... : ......... ......... : ......... . . . . U -1 -7 ___ �_. I . . : ......... : ...... . : ......... : ......... ......... : .......... � ........ ......... ......... : ......... : ... . : : 11 11 . .. .­­.. : I : I i : : : : : � . : : : : : : : : : : ......... : ......... : ................... : ......... : ......... % ......... ... .... : ......... I ......... i ......... i ......... ! ......... I ........ I,-. : ........ 1. ........ i ... .... 1 ......... 1 ......... I ... � ..... ! ......... I ......... I ......... i ......... : ......... 1 ......... I ......... I ......... 70 70 : : - : : I ­­ i ..... ! . : ! : . : _�_� N., * , : , : : . . : : ............ .. ............ ia - .,!­� ... .... � ..... .. � ............... I ....................................... r ...................................... � ... I ........... .... I. .. ... ......... : .... - r- ................................. : : : ...................... ......... � ............................................................................. � ..................................... + ...................................... ..... . .. ........... � 11 ­1 ............... i ............................... I ........ 1­11- ......... ** .......... r ...................................... � ................... I ................. �r ........... � .......................... � ...................................... � ...................................... iA ..................................... i : : . ..... : .: ....... : : : : : ........ 11 ........... I ......... : ... S-R 169 : : ...................................... � ...................................... � ...................................... � ................ r ... - .... * ... ­­­­ .... !'­­­ ........ *"*** .......... * .... !­* .... * ... ****,** ... *,**"**,*,*,**"r ... * .... *'***** ... **** .... *­­­­!­** ... ­* ... * ...... ­ ... ** ...... * ... r*,***"**'**'** ....... **­­­** .... !*** ....... * : r ........ . . I ......... : ......... i ......... 1 ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ... I . : . . ......... : . . . .. .... : ......... i ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... 1 ..... .. V . I ......... I ........ : ......... : ................... : .... ....... : ......... ; ......... : : : : '. , : : ; ; : : I . : : : : :^� �_ I : i I : 01 . - i ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . -do . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . � . : . . . . . . I . . i . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . : . . . I . . . . . I . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . : . . . I . : . . . . . . . . . : I . . . . -1 . . . . . . . . . ! . . . . 1. I - iw ; . I : . i : : : : : : . : , , , I * : . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . F . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . I : : : . , . . : - : : ! : : : . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : I . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . I . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . I I . . : I . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . : " I I I * I , : , I * * I - - I * ! I . . . . . . . i - - . . . . i - I : : . . . . . . . . . : . . . .�. . : : 1 : : 1 : : : : ; : : : : : : : : : : : .� . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . : r . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . I I I L * � I , I : I I I * , * , : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . I . . : . . . . . . . . : I I . � . : . I . . . . : . . . . . . . . . I . . . . - . : . : : : : : : ; : : ! * : , ... 1 ....... 1. : ..... .... 1 ......... : ......... : ......... I ........ 1 ......... i ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... 2 : 11 . I .... *' : : 2 ..... I ... :: : : . : : : : : . : : ......... : .... ... ......... ........ ......... : ......... : .... � .... : ......... ! ......... 1 . .. ......... I .... : ......... :1. ..... 1 .... .... : .... I ... I : . : : : : : : : : : : : i : ; : I � '� �.. 1: . I .... ... ... : ....... 1. I . ....... ; ........ 1 .... M . 'T. . . : ......... . .... I - .. ­... I - ..... : ........ I . .1 ..... . ... - . ! ................... 1 ......... 1 ......... : ......... : ......... � ... 1. Z : , , 11'' I : i ­­ , ­ . : ...... : ......... : ......... ! ......... � : .. ... .. : ......... : ..... : I : : . : : : : ......... ... . : : : : 11' * .... ­. I ......... I . ... i . ..- . �p . , - - - .. I ......... : ......... : ......... t ......... : ......... : ......... : : : ... :� ....... I ...... 1. .......... ..... I_ :.... : : : : : ! .... � ... Uj : ......... i - ...... : I *11 I I : , , I ........ ....... : .... � .... 1 ........ : ...... : : ......... : ...... - : ... *** ... : ......... : - ..... : ......... : ...... .. : ......... : . : . : : * ..... I ......... I ......... 1 .... I .... : .... I ... ; ......... : : : : : : : . : : ; : : : : : ; - .0 : ......... : ..... I ... : ...... ... ! I ........ ..... .. : ........ I ......... 11 ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... ; . . .4. . it . , . . �_ i ......... ......... : ......... ; ....... I.: ..... ­.: ......... : ......... :''** . . :111111-1: ­ : : : i . N I : . : : : : : : : ; : ; : ! : .. ... co ..... ! .................... I ........ ....... ! ­ ... * * i , ­ , . ........ : ......... : . ...... i ­' : : : . : : : . : : : : : i cr *j . :*­ I .... : ........ ......... : ......... I ......... ......... . ....... ......... ......... : ......... ; ..... ... : ........ : ......... ; .... - - - - - , ..... � . I I ......... ! ......... 1 : I 1 .. �1 kr , I - .. i ......... I ......... 60 . : . : ..... r .................... ........ �1 ...... - ......... ................ --- .. .......'' ... I ....... I ............................ . �i ....... ..0 ........... a .... *­ '­*j ............ . w ............... I .............. I ...................... ­11 ........ � ........ ......................... . ...................................... i ..... .... I ........................... I ......................... : : : : : ! , , , : , .., ................... � .......... 9, ! J--i ................................... i ...................................... ... ... ... ... ... . t ....................... . ........... : < �>. . ....... : ............. 1- ................................. * ... r ...................................... r ...................................... r ........... . . . . . . . .................................... r .......................... 60 ............ I .................. ..... ............ r.. .................. k ............... r .......................... ­ : r : ; : : x : : ..4.. : ............. ,f­r*­**jWt,* ...... § .... . _11 : . . ! ......... : ........ : .. ..... : .... I ... 1 ......... I ......... 1 ........ ....... : . . I ..... I : .... ... .. .... : ......... I ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : - : ........ I : S . . . . . .. IFACTORY AY .- ROOKS S . ; ac , . . ! , : , , I : ........ -r ........................................ ........... ..... . �- -:I �cq-:R� I --� . . .. . .............. I., ............... it .S . . t .... I . w ......... ; ... : . . . . _.w. : 11. .... - - : . : ....... : I ........ : : - -� ... : ! : N. .1 ST - . . -LL 4V1 ------ *** ...... * ­* . . .. . . : -2 ND ... ST; 1 N.- : - -2-ND ... . . . : : : : : : : : T ... .__.__­_-___ -1. .... w - - . . ......... : ..... � ... ! ......... : .... - . . . . . .. 0 . . . : ................... 1 . , . . . I : : - 1� .. ..... . I .0 ..... : ..... I . . : ......... !w ....... : . � ...... : .... .. . _% � :_ - - : .... I __ . law, .6 - . . : . : : . : . ;_ - : � ! : : : :0 ........ : : : . . I ......... : .......... ....... : : . : . IS ....... ! ......... : .... : ! � . . : ....... : .... ... ; ..... * ... 0 . : ......... : i I ........ : ......... : � ... 0. 0 - : - - T- 't ... : ....... .......... : ......... : ......... .: ......... I .... : I I ..... . : . : : : : ; : : . . .1-7 ..... 7 1 ......... : ......... : ........ : : : : : : : :z . I' , , * * * :, , '. , * * , , to ! : : : .. : : ..... : ......... ! .... .. I- _: . . . , : , : : . . � � i , , , . . ....... : . I ..... 11 V_ 0 . . . . . ...... .... I : : ... : . - I .... I : .... . . : ... : . . I : . . � ....... . . . I . : ......... : to ...... : ......... : ...... . .� . ­'. . . . .�.m . . . : ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : . : .. ......... : ......... : .... � : I � : . .... - : - . , : * , I . : - . : : :_ : : : * : : : .. : : :.1 ... I ..;1 ........ .... .... . I-& . : ....... : .... ... : ......... ! ......... : ......... : ... I ..... : ......... : ......... : � : I , , , - : . : ........ : I I : . . : : I'll *11 I : 11 : ... I ................... 1 .... * ... * � ­­ , - : , ''' , ­ ......... ..... : : : : : : . .... ... 1, I 00 _ - : 1. ...... I i .... I ... 1. 1. .. i ......... : , . : : : : : .... I .... .. m .... ; : . ........ . : .... .... i ....... * , : '' : ; : : : : : : ........ .... � . : : .... I .... . ; : 01' . : + I : : : : : : ... I-. . I ...... I : : 1:0+ . .... 1. : ....- ... io . ...... I ........ : . .. : .... ,..O . .. - .... ! ......... : : ......... : ......... : ......... : ....... : ......... : ......... : : : ... . :*** ..... :11, I .:­ .... ; _: ......... ! ......... ! ....... : .... ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : : **' : : - T1_ . : . : . : : : : : : : : . � : : : .... I : ......... : . T_ 0 .... i ......... i ......... 141- w ....... I ..... ... : ......... : . . It ... t . . T.- 1* . I . ! ......... ......... i ......... ; .. ... .. : ... I .. ... i ......... : S - .... : .. ..... ! ......... i.. 1­ .... - : : .... : ......... : .... .... ! ....... . :11 . :11 11-1 : . ....... :-I ....... : ....... : : * : : : . ... : - , : .1 ...... : ......... : .. . .: ..x 'I ... I ......... : ... I ..... : ......... : ......... ! ......... ! ......... ......... i ................. : : : : : : : : : : i : : : I * : : : � : I.. ..... ......... ... I I. cr 0) .... :1 ...... . : ..... I ... lfr1to ..... . . ... : ................... ......... . ...... :_ I I - - .1 . : , * ...... : , , : 11 .... : .... : : .... * ... : , - ­ : . : : . �t____ . . : : . : : .... 1 ......... : ..... . - : ......... ! ......... .... ­ . : ! : : I ...... ; . . ..... ........ I . ..... .... I ... - -- * 1, - . ......... ........ i ......... I ......... i ......... 50 : : : .1. . i .... ...... i ......... I ......... ; ... - : i ......... ......... .. ..... ....... : ......... ! ...... ..... i - .. : : : : ... '.. * ......... , : .... : ......... : .. . i * * '' i ... . : 1 ........... : . : ! , ­­ : : : ; : : . I .. ........... : . . .. . ....... ... ... ................ I ...... � ...................................... ....................................... ..... ....... � ............... I ..... 4 .................................... ­r ..... 1111111.1 ................ � ................... ..... --i ......... . . . . ..................................... . ................................. 1-14 ..................................... Ir-11.1 ... I ...... I ...................... � ...................................... I ................................. ..................................... ...... .......................... ... ............... ...................... r ................. I .................. I ........ ........................... ; .................................. --� ........................... .......... I .... ......................... I .... I'll, 11*11"**-""",--"-**",**,*"-*I*r"*'I I I I , 1*1111*111", ... ..... ...................................... ! . ... ... ..... � ! . . .......... - ­­ .... * ... * I ....... * I . . . ... .. ... ... : 50 .. I ................ + ..... I .......... I ......... I .. . . . ............. .... ... I ... I I I I ­­ I I 11 . . r i : ...... 1: ... - : . I .. - . r . . . . : r it .... ........ : ......... : I ........ : ......... : .... ... I ......... : : ... : ......... : .. ..... : ...... .. : - I ...... � ...... .. � ....... I ......... : ........ I : ......... : ... I ..... I - ..... ! .... - I - : ........ 0 0 ....... ..... ... : ... ..... : .. ...... : . - I ...... .... I ... : * * ..... : ......... : ...... : : : : ; . : : : . - 1 : : I : : : *. : : ..... ..... : ......... : ......... : 11 ...... : ..... : : I . . : ....... I . : ......... : ...... .. : ....... I . : .. .... � : . . . I . .. : ...... : ......... : .... . . �- _. ......... : . . - . . ; I . . 11 .... : ......... i ......... ! ......... : ......... : . . I ...... ........ 0 11 ....... I ......... ... � . � ... : .. ... I . . : . . I . � . . . ; , * , . : : : : : : : � . : ! : : : : � i ; : : I ..... : ......... : ......... �___T-:-� ... ! : : .\ ... ..... ! ......... : ......... : .... . I ...... ....... : ......... : ......... I ......... ..... : .... � .... : .. ...... : . . - . . . . . � � ... .... I . . ..... .. _�. . . . I I .... ....... : - .. ... j.. I' ' 'IL ... .... .. ... I : :11*11, ... : * , i . : I : : 1­­,'', 1 ......... 4 . . ...... ..... ....... : - I . . . . : ......... I . . : : : : !-.1 ..... : : .. - � . : : : . i ___� ... : . . . : : . . I : i ::EXIST .... : . . . - I . ...... L.:.. -..t.__: � ....... . I . . I * ** ! , , * * * * * : : : : : .. . I . . . ......... - ...... i ... *,*''*:,** * : �. J. --I .... : . : , ..... . , < .. : - 00 ..... ul ...... : ... I . : \ . . I . _.:.Jr.,, .... : ......... !.I ...... : ..... - .... .. : : < 'ci * I I I I , I : I , I I I , * , , . . : : I : : : �' : .... � 1 ........ t ....... ; . . . . .1 ...... : ......... ; .......... t ..... : ... ........ 0 0 ..... ** I , - : r vl W ... ... I ... ; ......... :: ....... < ........... : . < : ... � . 0 co - * , Im ...... I : ... 1. . . . . : . , ......... . ...... : .... . .. .. I... 42"RCP .... ! ......... i , * ..... * * : , * , , * .... : * , , * , '' * 4 ......... . ....... .... ..... : .. . I .... : . - � - - - - � - . . : (0 I * , , : I 0 tt). : - , . . . I ... : : : ... ..... . . : .. . .., ... L ...... i ...... :.T ........ ! ...... I ..... : * ... . .. : ; - Li 9 P: a : * . I ... : .7 . . ... ! ... \\�,,�/ I . . . .. I .... ..... ... : . : I .. : ......... : .< . : ... - - 0 : ' L ...... . OD . 0). : � � .1 I I I ........ . � .:. .... :. I ..... : .... : . 'T , C%J' * * * , , * i * , * * * , . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . I . Lp. : rl� q . . . . . . : I . . : . . . . . . . . : .T r-­; , , . . I : r\ I . : : : . . . . . . . . : : : . . I : : w : 1. W : I I : . . : . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . % - : . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! , . I . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . I . . . . : . . . . . . . I .... t ......... : ... I ..... : . th I . .1.. : . . .. I - ­­* ... : ' A-' - - - I ...... +' : ' ­ 4 ...... ' ': ­­ * * I '' . . ... i ......... I ......... � ... . .... 0 . . 0. ....... : . I ....... '. I I : : ......... I �x * , , , ,,< , I ,,, .... : , " , : : . I : : : 0 +: - - .. ... ... ................ I ......... : ...... ......... .... ... : .. . . I ......... : ......... ...... ..... : . . . . ...... ... . .0 + * ' . . b - , ... .... .... .... 3 : : . . : + . . .. ......... ! ... I 0 t?). : .. . ... .. . : . I . ... ... I .... + - . . 0 15� (0 ; . . : . I - , . ........ NJ K) : . 0 .� cq . : - t_: . 4r- V_ %, : : . : : . - _ .. . ........ : I � V_ ,K-. . : .... i , W .... i ..... � ... : , , * - i ........ - ! ..... ........ ..... ......... ; ..... X a: .,. . .. . . : ......... i ...... ..... ..... . ! ......... 1 ... . : ...... . I.t_ ... - - .........- : ... ­­ , Of c\j : , cr c\j , , (\J I .... *­ * I ­ ... * . . - I �' I : : : : � i ir . . . . ..... .. i I ....... .. ..... , ... . i ......... 40 � . .... * � .... I .......... ............. .. -, r . .. . .. ... ................... !­ - ....... ... ... [ ..... ........... ... ... ... ... ... I ..... .. I . ........ r ................. ...... J, I ................. ........... � ........ ............ .... . .................... ........ .. . .............................. I.+ ........... � .......................... � ..................................... 40 , : � - . ; ..... : ................. :n: ........ : ­­ ................. : ...... I ...... 11 ...... - ­ ............. I r ..................... I .............. i, .. ... ..................... � ........ i .. . ...................... :- .. .... 1, ............. I .......... I ........ . I ......... .............. 4 ......... ................................ P f ............................ 0 �r .. ................ ..................... 4 ................................... 1.1".. 0. 'T --, : ...... ........ � ...................................... r ..... . . I . : * ..... ­­* ... r * .... ­* .... ******"* ... *­*­*­! ...... ***'*'** ....... I j ... � ............................ ! . ................................ I ............ r,* .... * ..... *­*"**­­­* ! ........ ! . : . . : � : . � .... ......... ; ...... .. : ......... [ : . . ': :. : ......... : .... ..... . .. I .... I ... I ... : I ........ : ..... 1. ......... T_ � _+ : � ...... : ......... i ... 1. . . .* . ....... : ......... 1 ......... : ......... : ....... f ..... r I . . � ...... ..... 1 ... ..... 1 ......... I ......... : i : ........ . . ...... ...... : . I . : I : : . : : : :.... : . . . ....... ......... i ......... q:r ..... Lt � : . . . I . i .. ... .. : . . � ..... . : : : : - : : . : . i ......... I . . . ..... : . ....... ; I ...... : ....... I .... I . . I . I . ....... I 0: , , * I ... . . . : , , ...... :A-) - - : - I . . ......... ..... ......... .... : � . (p ..... :: .... I .... I . . I � ....... : ......... : ......... : ........ : ...... I ....... .... : - - - - - : : I * I * I ... : . . . . . ! . . . . * : : ; : : : i : . -­� 77 -7 _. . ! . . . . . . : . : : : � : : ! . . . L . � . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I - - I I I . . . ! . . . . . . . ----IV - - - - - 7 : . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . ! ­- . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . I I I I . . . . � : - . . . : : .. . ....... ......... I ........ ...... : ..... I., ...... . I I ..... ! ...... ...: . . . . . . . : : I I : . ; : & -----------. . : - . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . : : . . : . . . I . ­ ---7--7--= . . . . . . . . . . . . : . �, . : . . : . . . . . . I � . ----.-.r- , L­ I . . L � . . ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - . : . I . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! * . . . . I ...... :. ....... I .... I .... ...... I . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . � . . . . . . . : . ! . _.; . . : . . . . . . . . : t . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : , , . _L� : : . - I . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . - - 7-� . . . . . 1.p . . . . . . : I I - I I : I I I * I I * I I : I I . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . : : : � : . . : , � . . . . : . . . . . - - - . : . . . . . . . . : - . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . : I . . . . . . . f . . . . . . . . . ! - - . . . . ! . . . . . . . . .. . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . I : I , I . . . . . , - . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . : . : - : i . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . : : I ........ 1 ... -D-1 1, . .. . . . . : .. ! ......... ! ........ : ; : I I .... � ....... .. . � .... � 42"O - �� : : : ... .. .. .. ....... 1 ......... ! ..... I � . : ........... I I' ...... ­ ..... __�_ "I_ -.. 31 ......... I ... k("3 WEXISTY : I ­­ , . ......... . ... ... ............. I ..... .. ..... I ...... ; : , : : , ..... �... ...... ...... I ......... i ........ : . : . . . . 1 . _���� .... i .. ! .......... I ... � ..... 1 ...... .. 1 - - I I'll, ''I : - .... - I'i ­ ...... : ......... : : ..... i ...... � .! ......... : . ..... I ...... ­1 .1 : ..... .1. . : . .......... . ...... . ..... ..... I . I . : . ....... : . . . . . . : '­ : , : i ­­ : : . . 0005 .... .... I .... ........ -365. � . ......... ... ...... : ........ : ......... ........ : ; : ::��� i . . : : : : : : : : : ..... - . .. . . :­ ... : ... : I ..... : .... ...... .... � . . ....... : ......... : ....... ...... .... . * : : I , .... : --- r . ...... : * - ;,. .. : ..... . ..... : " : - . . I ................. : : : : * ......... I� ........ i ...... ......... ...... ......... EXIST - - . ; ......... : , : i : ; ........ I . . . I 11 : _: : $ .... ..... : ........ t i ­ I ... i ......... 30 : . 1 ...... - ; ...... � ..... I ... .1 . .... : ......... ... .. i L 'I ...... 1 ... .... ... . ..... I . . : - ! , , . . \ ... i ......... : ...... : , : . : : - ................... . :.1 ................................... ...�. ... - .... ­1 ....... ................................ ...... i� ......... I .. .... ... ......... I ... I ............... r ..................................... ! ........ 36.3 ................... � ..................................... + ....................... ....... ..................................... : : -.1- .......... ..... I—. .................. 11 .......................... �\ - - - - .......... : I - . . . . . . * I , - * , , , , I , , : : . I- .............. .......... ! . ... ... - ... ... ... .... 4.4- - *** *** "I .. ... ............................... r ............. I ........ . .......... - I � - ... ... ... ... ... ... 30 ._.42..'.?RCP ... ... ..................... + ........................ L"' . ; - . ... � ...... r ........... ... .4 ............... ................... - , - ... - .... * ................... . ........... .: - ._­ . . ....... r- . .............................. r ............ .. ............ ....... . ! r ...... * ... - �­ ... *'***"** . i ........ : ......... i ... : ... :.I ......... ......... ......... ... . : - - ... ... .: L� - -�­_ . .... ! .. ... _ : . ...... I ......... I : - . . .. ....... I . ......... ..... : : : r- ..... *'***** ... * ... * ... *­* ..... ­r - r .. I j I ­­ ** '­­­ � . ... : .... I .... :.1 ....... I ... ; ....... : .... I .... : ....... : ........... _.% T . I ... ­ . . . : I ....... * � : : . __ ; : : I : : - : _ ....... : ., I ..... I ­ .. . - �. -.. . . : .... .... : ......... : ......... : ... .... I ..... I ......... : ........ I : . ....... : ............. . I . . ......... . : : : . - I : : .1 . -32-.8 � : : ; : : : ....... I.! .. ... .. : .. ..... :. ... .. - .. . : - . I ...... : ......... . : : : : i ......... I.... : . i : ..i ......... i ......... ......... ........ . : : : : :.- :� ..... . ... ..... : ......... : ......... : I. :: ::::�' . : ......... : .... I .... : .. .............. I 11-1- .; ... ...... : , - .1 : '' : : - _�� �-- - �, ......... I .... ..... . i ... * .... i *­ : : : I , ­ ... ­ :1 * .......... * * I ***''* ... I : . : . . 1 . . . : : 11, . : . . . . . . ! . . . . . . . . . : . . : . . . I . - - I : . . . . . . . . : . ....... 1 . . . . . . . . . ........ : ......... I ....... : � I . � � ..... : . . . . . .. : ..... I . : ....... .,-:.o ........ ! . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . ! . . . . . . . : , . . . . . : . . : I . . . . . . . . . : ... ..... . : I . . . . . . . I : : , : : . . : : ! : : : ......... : : D-I P - - : - - - I � ... : . . . . . . . . I : . 1 .... ... i ......... I ......... i ......... I ......... . . i ......... : ......... ..... i ......... I ......... : .......... ........ ! . :42 ! - I I * , \ . ..... : . ... ... *. , : I * : I ......... : ......... :� ........ :., ... ... I .. .... - : : ; : : : I ....... : : ! : : : : : : =. � I ...... .. .. : - - - , . . , 97, 1 ' .... ..... : ......... : . - ... : - � ...... :S .. : ..... I : ....... I - : .... .. I ; .. : . . .. : . . .. . i ......... I . I ....... : ......... I ......... I ..... ....... ! ......... ; .. ..... ! ......... ; ......... I .......... : .... I .... *­1 :1*1 : . : I ......... : �j ....... I : ......... : .... : : : : : . i 1* I ......... I ......... i ......... I ......... : ; : : ..! ......... : ......... I ........ ....... : ......... i ......... ; ....... I ... .t. .. I ... : ......... : ....... : ......... : .... .... ;. � . ... . ..... I-! ......... 1 ......... : ......... I ....... - . i.. , : . : . : : : . . : ........ I .... : ......... : - ...... ......... : . .1 : . I . '97b : ......... : ; : ......... .... i ......... I ................... ­ ... : ... - : ........ : : : : : : .... I .... I ......... : : ...... ........ .... ... i . ......... . .... - : 11 I I **, : - - - . : I 1 ......... : ........ . : I I 111*1: I I I . I : . : ­ ........ : ...... . ...... : � ...... 1 ......... I ......... ......... : : .... ... : ....... . : : : - ....... ... ! ......... i ... i - - ­ ..... i ......... ....... .... ........ � ...................................... [ ................ I ..................... .............. : ... ... . . : .. ... .. I - I . ; ... .... . . . .2 5L.T... .. . . . � .... i ......... I .... ; .... I - . ** ­­­ * , * ! 20 : : i : '' 2-5-1 .... : ... It ................... .......... I.,- .......... ........................... �-. ................................. . ................................ . . ........................ . 'i ( -, - �.� . a : : : ....... ....... � . . ...... ............................... � . - .. ... . . . .. .. . ...................... ­r ..... 1-1. .......................... I ......... � ........................... - - .; .. .. ......... ..-.. i ........ .................................... 4 .......... I ...................... . .. Ir I ..................................... t � . .... .... I , A , ­ ­ k . ..... ! : ...... ....... � ......... ­+� 0.002. * � * * . * , . : ..... I , .. �t I , , ­ .. ....... *­*.1 ......... * ....... i ! I— * I I I � ................... ­[.* ... * - ...... I ... -_A ... . ..................... ....... ­-.11 ........ 1.11, .- 26,3 ..... .......... .................... r .................................. 1-r ....................................... � 20 ..... . ... ... ... ... .... - ........ I ... I ............ � ..... r ........... ... ... ...... Z4J ....... rL.I.- ........................... I ... ! ................ I ... � ............. I .... !­ ...... I ... I.. 1- : ; : . r ......... ! ......... I ......... . . . : : : : I— .... **'*'**'** ........... **'*'** .......... *'*** .... * ...... [ : ......... i ......... : ......... : ......... 1 .... I . t.. ... . ......... ......... : .... � ... : ......... :.. ..: ......... : ......... : ......... : ......... : ........ *** ...... i ................... : ..... ......... : ,� . I ....... : .... ... I j . : : : ......... I ........ ...... : .... .. Z2 ... .. I ...... ......... I ..... : ........ ......... : ........ I : ......... ! ... ..... : ......... : ......... ......... .... ...... I : ......... : ....... : : . : : : : : : : : : : ..... r : ..1 ........ I ......... : I . ..... : , '21.9, , '. , 1 , * '. I ..... : . . . ....... � * ......... . . : I I I I * * I .... : : : . % . : . i : . ; . ... I . . . ; : . Z�-9 , . : ... ..... : ......... : .. ... .. : : ......... : ... I . : : : : I : : . : : . . : ....... i ....... i ......... ! ......... : ......... ! ......... ... I ..... : ......... :. : : : ..i ... ..... 1 ...... ...i ......... I.- : ......... I ......... I.- I ................... ... ! ......... : ... 1-.1: ....... :111, ..... ; ......... : ......... 1 ......... I .... .. I.: ....... I.: ..., : .... : ....... . . : : . : : I : : : : : : : : : ...; ........ i ......... I ......... ......... 2117: : : : . . ......... ..... : . - : - I * I * " I * I : , I , : : . .... : ......... : .... .:., .... ...: ......... : ......... 1 ......... ; ......... :11111*1*1i, I : ...... 1:1 ....... .. ........ I : .. ... PROFILE,." � '' : ......... ....... : .. ...... ! : ; i : : : ..... I - . : . : ......... : - . ...... ... I ­.: ........... ..... ..... : ... ........ ....... : 1 2-1-.6. I ...... � - . i ......... i . � ....... ..... 1 ......... : ......... : ........ �, * : I * 1, , I '' : , . . . ! , ...... I. I , * , * * , ­ .. I ......... f ......... : ........ :, ..... : ......... : ......... 1 ......... ! ..... . : . ... I .. ! 1111* ..... 1 ......... : .: ..... ..I ........ I ......... i ......... . 1­­­ ........ I .. . :­­ . : ! : .. I. I .... - ..! ..... ... I ......... ......... i ......... I ......... ........ * . : : : : : ... i ......... : ....... . ; ......... 1 ... I . : .... I i ......... i ......... I . . . ... . . ........ 1 ......... ; ......... ..... i ......... ! .... .. I I ......... 1 ......... 1 ......... : ........ 1:11*111111:,*** ..... 1 ...... :11, ­­:,­ : : . : ......... g ! : 1 " -= 0 �M HOR. :: : ...... ; ... ..... I ......... : ....... � . .... . . i - ...... i ......... : I . .r.. ) . ... ......... : I : ; . . ! ...... - I : : : I ......... I ..... : - .... I .. .(. .. ......... : ......... .... : ......... : ......... i ......... ..... i . .. ...... ! ...... � - - : ......... : ......... : ......... ! ......... i ... : : . ! - - i : ! '', ­*­ : : : : : ......... : ... ....... ::: I : / : ... :­­ . �'­ . : ... : .... ­* ; � .... : ...... ... .... . .... : : : : : . . . z! ... . . . : . I - . . .. ..... i ......... I .... . ! I ....... I .... : '' ! : : : : ......... : I 1 W ' V*E - R' .' ' ' ' ' ..... : .... I ... I I ....... - : . ? ......... : ......... : ......... : ...... .. : ......... : ......... : ......... : .... I . . I : I ... : * ... : i ; . .,,:�5 . m . . ._.; V ......... : . ; : ; : ... ..... ... .... ..... I : � : : : ... i ......... I ......... i ......... I-. ..,.I ......... i ......... i ......... I ....... ­i.- ...... I ......... I ......... I ......... I 1*111* ......... ; ......... ! ......... : ...... ...:... ..... : ......... : ......... i .... I .... :... .. ......... i ......... i ......... i ......... i .. ...... 1 : i : : : : I . --- L - ! . ­_ - ' : . -________i_ - 0+00 10+1 20+ .__­ - -- -- .11 - - --- -- 30+ - - ­_ - I - I I -1 - -- - - - --.--- -_ 40+ -_ - 50+ DATEt I DES I (")ED, _____ ,________._____._ - Lf, q. r. 9 G. 5. (Ar)JVSTFD 194 7) R-8. &",& M Fm T R 0 0 w5r__ __ .-.-..---- ___ - 10 _j�­­_ _____�_C�i�f­ . I 0 __ ___­ ­_____ - � ___ --,-. FR WN I F1 I F �T F D I f CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION - D.W.G. Y75 Li _­1 - � ------. - DA - _­­ NOTED - j RFC0MmFN0Fff, __ _ a - Tc /_/ 9 _" w ___ - --,-,--.--- - P k-pl" / F __ XE �_ 'i_ii0__ ______ '--- - LU CONTRAC I _j RA w - f Q. . 1____.__­-__-. � -_ - - - - _____ ______ I- -------.-- __ ------I.-- ____ - - 0 py DATF COORDINATES L_ BEARINGS #PF AFrROVFr) I OF - C) Not REV 151 ON ON Cn- / f Uj JORD11P III SYSIEM KTV� i" ' JLNGp, FlIlr-ll ,.. _ . _ ­­ �1 ,------. ____j-___ j_______.___ I I I � _____� ____ ------I- - _­­ - _ � '41 p I � ,. � __ , -, _ _ , . I . I I . IT I ­1 _1­__1_­_.1_­­ .. .. -1.11, ,­ I—— ' ­­­-­-__­-'V­ ­­, _.. ­_ ­­ _-.,,,-.,-.---�l,--",-','---""L-'.I'I'-- ­­_ � v T_­ , ­_­ -_ -- __­­ Ir- _v - It , Akr,()�:l FORM F80 22" P' A A C I) I- r r, I I