Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWWP2702291_2or7 (-3V3; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 J'okj — WARREN KELLOGG BARBER DEAN & FONTES, P-S HONORABLE J. V. WHITE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING MARI ANNE HIRSCHFELD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF RENTON, a municipal Corporation; FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Washington Corporation; KING COUNTY, aka MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE, a municipal corporation; and JOHN DOES 1-10, who may be individuals, d/b/a, or corporations. Defendants. NO. 97-2-30536-5KNT DEFENDANT FRANK COLUCCIO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION Defendant Frank Coluccio Construction Company answers Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production as follows: INTERROGATORY NO.1: Provide the name and address of the municipal or private entity that owned the alley between Burnett Avenue North and Williams Avenue North at the 200 block in Renton, Washington on January 14, 1996, where the accident occurred that forms the basis for this lawsuit. COLUCCIO'S RESPONSES TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AN-D REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION - 1 LAW OFFICES OF MILLS MEYERS SWARTLING 1000 SECOND AVENUE, 30TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9810.4-1064 TELEPHONE (206) 332-1000 FACSIMILE (206) 386-7343 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 171? 23 24 25 26 ANSWER: Based on information and belief, the City of Renton, a named defendant, owned the alley described. J INTERROGATORY NO.2: Provide the name and address of the municipal or private entity that was responsible for maintaining the surface of the road in the aforementioned alley on January 14, 1996. ANSWER: Based on information and belief, the City of Renton was responsible for maintaining the surface of the road in the aforementioned alley. INTERROGATORY NO.3: Provide the name, address and telephone number, and occupation of all individuals or businesses that performed any work on the aforementioned alley between January 1, 1995 and March 1, 1996. For each such entity, described (sic) the nature of the work performed and the approximate dates thereof. ANSWER: Objection. Multiple contractors and municipalities were on site near this alley during the time period requested. Each contractor had any number of employees at the site. These circumstances make this request overly broad and unduly burdensome. Furthermore, the time period requested makes this interrogatory overly broad and unduly burdensome. Without waiving said objection, The following contractors performed underground piping work (and the work incidental thereto) in the allev: Coluccio Construction, a named defendant. Gary Merlino Construction 9125 - 10th Avenue South Seattle, WA 908108 Coluccio Construction performed work only to the point of the manhole at the entrance to the alley. The bulk of the contract work was performed between June 1995 and October 1995. Gary Merlino Construction, as Coluccio's subcontractor, performed COLUCCIO'S RESPONSES TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION - 2 L-kW OFFICES OF MILLS MEYERS SWARTLING 1000 SECON-D AVENUE, 30TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WASHLNGTON 93104-1064 TELEPHONE (206) 332-1000 FACSMLE (1-00) 336-7343 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 pavement reconstruction work on the manhole at the entrance to the alley during the same time period. The purpose of the Coluccio/Merlino work was to provide access from the main pipe which ran under North Third Street, for a Renton pipeline which was to lay under the alley. Coluccio's work did not extend into the alley beyond the point of the manhole. Some minor and incidental "punchlist" and cleanup work occurred between November 1995 and March 1996. This consisted of only ten days of work. No Coluccio work was done between November 22, 1995 and February 24, 1996 at the site (based on certified payroll records). Based on information and belief, the City of Renton contracted separately with Gary Merlino Construction to perform the pipe and actual "hook-up" work in the alley. The Merlino hook-up work was performed after Coluccio finished its task of providing access to the main pipe line. Coluccio does not know the precise dates on which Renton/Merlino performed the alley pipe work under the Renton/Merlino contract. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.1: Provide a copy of the all (sic) documents evidencing any contracts or agreements between and among entities that memorialize the work that was identified in Interrogatory Number 3. RESPONSE: The contract and specifications to the contract between King County and Coluccio is voluminous. It will be made available for copying at plaintiff's expense. See attached contract between Coluccio and Gary Merlino Construction. Coluccio is not privy to any contracts between Gary Merlino Construction and the City of Renton. INTERROGATORY NO.4: Provide the name, address, telephone number, and occupation of the all (sic) individuals or businesses that performed any work on the manhole or manhole cover, and the grading or asphalting around the manhole in the aforementioned alley that lies just south of North 3rd Street, during the time period COLUCCIO'S RESPONSES TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION - 3 LaW OFFICES OF MILLS MEYERS SWARTLING 1000 SECOND AVE,I E, 30TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WASHLNGTON 98104-1064 TELEPHONE (206) 381-1000 FACSINUI E (206) 386-7343 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 January 1, 1995 to January 14, 1996. State the type of work performed by each entity and the dates of such work. ANSWER: See objection and answer to interrogatory No. 3. Without waiving any objections, Coluccio and Gary Merlino's work in the alley,- which preceded the Renton/Merlino work, would have included temporary repaving and leveling of the manhole. This work, however, would have been taken up and redone by Renton/Merlino to accommodate the alley pipeline hook-up to the mainline. It is believed that the Renton/Merlino work occurred after the Coluccio/Merlino work was complete and before the plaintiff's accident. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.2: Provide a copy of each work order, contract, letter or other document that pertains to the work performed that was identified in response to Interrogatory number 4. RESPONSE: See RFP No. 1. See attached. Coluccio does not have in its control any documents pertaining to work performed under the Renton/Merlino contract. INTERROGATORY NO. 5: Provide the name, address, telephone number, and occupation of all individual or companies that made any repairs or modifications to the manhole, manhole cover, or road bed surrounding the manhole described in Interrogatory number 4 after Plaintiff Hirschfeld's accident on January 14, 1996. State the nature of the repairs made by each entity, and the date of said repairs. COLUCCIO'S RESPONSES TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION - 4 LAW OFFICES OF MILLS MEYERS SWARTLING 1000 SECOND AVENUE, 30TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WASH NGTON 98104-1064 TELEPHONE (206) 382-1000 FACKNGLE (206) 386-7343 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ANSWER: Based on Coluccio Construction payroll reports, the following Coluccio employees were present at the overall work site on February 15 and 27, 1996: Randy J. Brown 13210 127th Ave. S.E. Snohomish, WA 98290 Nathan McGinnes 28454 168th St., #13 Kent, WA 98042 Raymond E. Gleason 6735 35th S.W. Seattle, WA 98126 Ronald Lee Weasea 2924 N.E. Spartan Ct. Poulsbo, WA 98370 Patrick J. Mayer 19854 S.E. 342nd St. Auburn, WA 98092 Coluccio has been unable to determine the exact nature or location of all work on these days. Most of the work performed on these dates was remaining punchlist work from the "defects and omissions" list transmitted from King County to Coluccio on November 22, 1995. Some work was related to the invert elevation errors discussed in the December 21 letter from King County to Coluccio. (See Request for Production No. 3.) REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 3: Provide a copy of each work order, contract, letter or other documents that pertains to the work performed that was identified in response to Interrogatory number 5. RESPONSE: See two letters, King County to Coluccio (W/M 7-36, dated December 21, 1995) and Coluccio to King County (W/M 07-94-11, dated December 27, 1995) regarding modifications to manholes. Also see punchlist transmitted to FCCC on November 1995. INTERROGATORY NO. 6: Provide the name and address of the municipal or private entity that ordered the work that was performed as noted in Interrogatory number 5. ANSWER: City of Renton and King County. COLUCCIO'S RESPONSES TO LAW OFFICES OF FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES MILLS MEYERS SWARTLING AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION - 5 1000 SECOND AVENUE, 30TH FLOOR SE-aITLE, W:�+..HL�INGTO lGTOtV 98104-1064 TELEPHONE (206) 382-1000 FRCS :VIILE (206) 386-7343 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 INTERROGATORY NO.7: List the name, address, telephone number, and occupation of every person who participated in answering these discovery requests. ANSWER: Alan R. Christian Project Engineer Frank Coluccio Construction Company Don Harris Controller Frank Coluccio Construction Company ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION I certify that the responses to these interrogatories comply with Civil Rule CR 26(g) of the Rules of Superior Court, State of Washington. DATED: March 10, 1998. COLUCCIO'S RESPONSES TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION - 6 MILLS MEYERS SWARTLING Attornevs for Defendant Frank Coluccio Construction Company By: Caryn eraghvjorgelgen WSBA No. 27514 LkW OFFICES OF MILLS MEYERS SWARTLING 1000 SECOND AVENTUE, 30TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-1064 TELEPHONE (206) 382-1000 FACSafILE (206) 386-73r13 FRANK COLUCCIO CONST ® 2067254764 03/10/98 15:01 :02/02 NO:325 ufitu)WV IUL. 1T:47 YAA 1 1W6 ;xe 1Jda RILLS UYkky awAX'1LIN(- 'auux 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STATE OF WASHTNGTON COUNTY OF IQNC putt R. Christian, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and states; I am the Project Engi-r<Kr for Frank n�t�To ol pland the answers thereto, of � dQfvndants herein. I have read the forts g Sat�ti�s know the contents thereof, and I &m informed wd believe the answcr3 to be true. 4ARL. T kN $igred and sworn to before me by ALAN R. CHRISTIAti this C46-1ay of March, 1998. M. CO /9 • T1^Y� 1R� ETA q N _ : * T7ped Name. C cD\>�, H . O-C� _ N tery Public in and for the `,'►: 9P U B L 1 p ow $tote of Washingt r% 4My Commission Expires; —Cc COL<;CC1(YS RPSPONSI s To P110T SET OF 1NTEKRDGATORJES AND RfiQUESi'S PCJR PRCTCTUC1I0N 7 MILLS MEYEZtS SWARTL1vC; taw Vect*-V '-VDrvt, NTH M-01 i Searnx Y�I^SKMTD� Tr_u,aa•t (236) 34"000 f.CnMICY act) 116.7.w! 03/10/98 TLE 15:04 [Ts/RS NO 76721 3-05-1998 5:44PM FROM FCCC NORTH CREEK 425 S05 3957 P.6 11/22/1995 17:20 20668g22a4 KCDMS SC HALL d2 Asphalt & Concrete Pavement Corrections 3CJBri7ET RO Project No. Title: W/M7-94 Metro/Renton North Third Street Project Contractor Frank Coluccio Construction Company Award Amount: $1.387,737.00 Final Cortract Price-. Completion Date: Construction Inspection Item No. 5pec/owg Reference Detects and Omissions List inspection ByMaw 1 Brooks St, seal edges of ACP 2 3rd & Bumett, adjust existing Metro MH frame/cover & clean STA 0+00 12' Rt 3 3rd & Bumett, locate & adjust monument case Sta GL+00 C 4 3rd & Bumett, NE quadrant,remove cold mix from valve box patch, install class-B ACP and seal joint Sta 0-+-30 L 5 Sumett/Wiltiams Alley, make corrections to asphalt patch to meet back of driveway and drain properly 6 3rd & Williams, SW quadrant, adjust existing valve box Sta 2+75 R 7 3rd & Williams, NW quadrant, grind 12' wide by aft long asphalt strip along gutter, 6 ft North of X-walk on Williams 8 3rd & Williams, NE quadrant, adjust existing MH cover/frame Sta 3-15 L 9 3rd R Williams, NE quadrant, adjust existing valve box Sta 3+20 L 10 WilliamslWells Alley, redo asphalt patch to meet back of driveway 11 3rd & Welts, SW quadrant, adjust existing valve box to new grade Sta 6+60 R 12 3rd & Wells, NE quadrant, adjust existing valve box to new grade Sta 5+a0 L Prepared by: Date: November 22, 1995 Page 1 of 3 03/05/gs THU 16:40 ITX/RX NO 76201 3—ES-1 998 S : 44Pr 1 FROr 1 F CC NORTH CREEK 42S 826 39S7 P. 7 11/22/ 1995 17: 0© 20S;S422Sd KUDK--; SC NAC:E 93 Asphalt & Concrete Pavement Corrections 31It M1ET R[7 Project NoJTitle: W/M7-94 Metro/Renton North Third Street Project Contractor, Frank Coluccio Construction Company Award Amount: $1,387.737.00 Final Contract Price: Completion Date - Construction Inspection Item No. Spec/Dwg Reference p� and Omissions U3t Inspection By/Date 13 3rd & Wells, NE quadrant, adjust existing sewer frame/cover Sta 6+70 L 14 3rd & Pelly, NE quadrant, adjust & clean existing sewer frame/cover Sta 9+50 L 6 3rd &. Park, N side, 33 tt W of intersection, adjust & clean valve box Sta 11 +75 L 16 3rd & Park, NW quadrant, adjust & clean existing sewer frame & cover Sta 12+10 L 17 3rd & Park, NE quadrant, adjust 2 existing valve boxes Sta 12-45 L 18 3rd & Park, SW quadrant, adjust existing valve box Sta 11+90 R 19 Park/Garden Alley, adjust frame & cover to correct grade and re -do pavement restoration 20 re -do & Garden, patch at monument case Sta 16+70 C 21 3rd & Garden, NW quadrant, adjust existing MH frame & cover Sta 16+90 L 22 3rd & Garden, North side, adjust two valve boxes Sta 16+90 L 23 3rd & Garden, 60 ft East of intersection, adjust gas co. valve boxes Sta 17+50 R 24 Garden/Meadow alley, clean cover of MH Prepared by;� Date: November 22, 1995 Page 2 of 03/05/98 THU 16:40 (T\/RZ \0 769-01 =—'5-1998 5:4SPt1 FROPt FCCC NORTH CREEK 42S 8C6 3957 P o 11/ 22/ 1yy5 1 /: bd 2dbbb422S'4 KLJMS 52C F AUL d4 Asphalt & Concrete Pavement Corrections :419MEETRC3 Project No-Fr-itle: W/M7-94 Metro/Renton North Third Street Project Contractor: Frank Coluccio Construction Company Award Amount: $1,387,737.00 Final Contract Price: Completion Date: Construction Inspection Iiern No. Spec/ewg Reference Defects and Omissions List Inspoctlon By/Date 25 3rd & Meadow, NE quadrant, adjust existing MH frame & cover Sta 19+50 L 26 3rd & Meadow, seal patch around monument case Sta 19+50 C 27 Meadow/Factory alley, re -do asphalt patch and transition old existing pavement to now driveway 28 3rd & Factory, N side, 9 ft West of x-walk, adjust monitor well cover Sta 21+90 L 29 Sta 12+45 R, adjust existing MH frame & cover �p Sta 16+90 R, adjust existing valve box 31 Sta 17+38 L, adjust existing valve box 32 Sta 0+65 R, grourt luminaire base 33 Sta 3t60 R, qrQul luminaire base 34 Sta 5+25 R, groul luminaire base 35 36 Prepared by: "r- ��, Date: November 22, 1995 Page 3 of --I ..._ 03/05/98 THL: 16:40 [TX/RX NO 76201 3-0S-1 993 S : YSPP-1 FROM FCCC r•jcP.TH CREEK 112S 8OG 39S7 P. 9 11/22/ 1y95 17:20 2066841154 K�.;b 5 5C PAGE 05 Landscape Corrections Q1rn6TRo Project Na./Title: W/M7-94 Metrn/Renton North Third Street Project Contracto,. Frank Coluccio Construction Company Award Amount: $1.387,737.00 Final Contract Price: Completion Date: Construction Inspection Item No, spw-jowg Reference Defacts and Omissions List Inspection By/Date Replace rejected irrigation control cabinet with approved model. Electr"l will be inspected after replacement F2 F2O42950- Wrap tree trunks for winter 3 R02810- 3.03B perform coverage test for sprinkler system 4 R02810- 1.04 A2 Submit as -built drawing of installed system 5 R02810- 3.04A Balance & adjust irrigation system 6 R02810- 3.046 Instruct City of Renton staff on operation, of system 7 R02810- 3.04C g D Winterize system Turn on in spring 8 uncover sprinkler heads covered by topsoil and hydroseeding operation 9 200 Factory Ave N, repair grass along repaired section of sidewalk 10 R02610- 3.0413 supply three each of alI operating and servicing keys and wrenches Prepared by: 1W_ Date: November 22, 1995 Page 1 of 03/05/98 THi. 16:40 [T\/R\ \0 76201 -0s- 1998 S : FROM FCCC NOPTH CP.EEK 42S BOG 39S7 P. 1 y-I jL/ 1 JJJ 1 I . - �--- 1-1 - �VL VU Sidewalk, Driveway & Ramp Corrections 3CIgiT7ETR0 Project No./Title: W/M7-94 Metro/Renton North Third Street Project Contractor Frank Colucclo Construction Company Award Amount: S1,387,737.00 Final Contract Price— Completion Date: Construction Inspection Item No. Spe ./Dwg Referenca Defects and Omissions List Inspecticn sy/Uete t 3rd & Pally, SE comer, remove tack from sidewalk 2 3rd & Park, 0 Golden Dynasties, remove tack from walk & driveway 3 3rd & Park, NW comer, remove tack from walk/curb 4 3rd & Park, NE comer, remove tack from walk 5 3rd & Park, west driveway to Amolds Market, remove tack from driveway/waik 6 3rd & Park, SE comer, remove tack from walk 7 3rd &. Garden, NE comer, remove tack from walk/curb 8 3rd & Meadow, NW comer, remove tack from walk 9 3rd & Factory, SW comer, remove tack from walk/curb t Q 3rd & Factory, SW comer, remove concrete splatter from side of apartment building Prepared by: -41' Date: November 22, 1995 Page t of 03/05/93 THL' 16:40 [TC/R\ 'N0 76201 3-CS-1 998 S : dspP-1 FROM FCCC NORTH CREEK 42S C(D6 39S7 P. 1 1 11/22/1y'in 1!:UL) LlJpor,4z-1z4i >� I"UL- uI Signs & Channelization Corrections 3J1K rn6T FRO Project No./Title: W/M7-94 Metro/Renton North Third Street Project Contractor Frank Coluccio Construction Company Award Amount: $1,387,737.00 Final Contract Price: Completion Date - Construction Inspection Item No. Spec/Dwg Reference Defects and Omissions List Inspection By' Date 1 DwG cs2oi- CS295 Install pavement maricings, channelization, cross walks M and stop bars per dwgs and work changes 2 DWG CS203 note 3 Adjust location of ovehead signs 3 DWG CS206 Remove signs R33 - R37 tum over to City of Renton (Dwg CS201 Gen note 2) 4 3rd & Wells, So west comer, reinstall street name sign 5 Dwg CS201, Install markers & edge line West of Bumett, per channclizatio notes 1, 3 8 4 6 7 8 9 10 Prepared by: it ��� Date: November22, 1995 Page 1 of 03/05/98 THU 16:40 [TC/RY :N0 76201 3-OS-1998 S:46PM FROM FCCC NORTH CREEK 42S 826 39S7 P.12 L t . eju 4unaa�_4U4 _" ' ^_ __ Sewer Corrections 3JJgrnETlRo Project No./Title: W/M7-94 Metro/Renton North Third Street Project Contractor. Frank Coluccia Construction Company Award Amount. $1,387,737.00 Final Contract Price: Completion Date: Construction Inspection Item No. Reference 0"fscts and Omissions List Inspection By/Date 1 MH R10-1A, coat MH neck w/ Wasser Conseal to match interior of MH 2 MH R10-2A, coat MH neck w/ Wasser Conseal to match nterior of MH 3 MH R10-2A, clean sediment from invert for 100 ft upstream and downstream from MH 4 MH R10-3A, coat MH neck w/ Wasser Conseal to match interior of MH 5 MH R10-3A, Remove asphalt from invert and sediment in pipe 6 MH R10-3A, patch and coat first joint 7 MH R10-4A, coat MH neck w/ Wasser Conseal to match interior of MH 8 MH R10-4A, remove wedge from under reducing slab and patch hole 9 MH R10­5A, mud joint under frame, 2 areas 10 MH R10-5A, add step in neck 11 MH R10-5A, coat MH neck w Wasser Conseal to match interior of MH 12 MH R10-5A, clean Invert Prepared by: l�r Date: November 22, 1995 Page 1 of 2 03i06/9S THI 16:40 [T\/RX NO 76201 3—CS-1 998 5 : 4 7 PM FPOt-1 FCCC NORTH CREEK 42S 806 39S7 P . i 2 11/ Lam/ 1 �7J L i . UU F10-J ILM 7t. rHl7C U7 Sewer Corrections Project No./Ttle: W/M7-94 Metro/Renton North Third Street Project Contractor, Frank Coluccio Construction Company Award Amount: $1,387,737.00 Final Contract Price: Completion Date Construction Inspection Item No. SpeeJDwg Reference Defects and Omissions List Inspection By/Date 13 MH R10-6A, coat bare pipe ends w/ MFG recommended coating system 14 MH R10-6A, coat MH neck w/ Wasser Conseal to match interior of MH, al--o coat picking eyes 15 MH R10-7A, coating touch up 16 clean ail catchbasins within project limits 17 3rd & Burnett, SW quadrant, clean exist catch basin asphalt in bottom 18 3rd & Factory, SW quadrant, turn CB grate to face correct direction 19 MH 41. BurnezruWi.11iams Alley, Install eiDcw at bottom of drop, raise channel to springline 20 MH =5. Park/Garden Alley. Remove channel from MH 21 All alley MH's, grout around pipes at invert entering Metro line MH #1 & #7, grout around all pipes in MH 22 23 24 Prepared by: Date_ November 22, 1995 Page 2 of 2 03/05/98 TH[: 16:40 [TX/RX \0 76201 3-35-1998 5=43PM FROM FCCC NORTH CREEK 425 SOG 3957 P. a '"PMETRO King County / Department of Metropolitan Services Exchange Building - S21 Second Avenue - Seattle, WA 98104-1598 - (206) 684 - 2100 December 21. 1995 W/M 7-36 Mr. Al Christian Frank Coluccio Construction Company 9600 M.L. King Jr. Way S Seattle, WA 98118 Cedar River Trunk - Phase I1 Metro Contract W/M 7-94 A1lev MH Repair Information Dear Mr. Christian: Per our conversation. the paragraph of the letter to Metro which expresses the City of Renton's concern for reimbursement or covering the corrections to the alley MH's is below. Excerpt from City of Renton letter: In the case of the connections to Metro from c;ur alley locations, the invert elevations at the manhole were all set above the design elel; ation shown on the plans and in more than one instance were over one foot above the design elevation (see attached copy of as-builts and table). This modification hay UUsed the City to redesign its alley sewer plans such that we meet the, revise cievations In addition, our contractor has been required to re -drill a number of the connections to the manhole and bust out the channel provided in order to adjust to the higher as -built elevations from Metro's contractor. This additional work may require a change order from our contractor. Because this work was necessitated from improper installation of our facilities by Metro's contractor, it would be our understanding that Metro will be responsible for all costs associated with any additional work by our contractor for adjustments to the existing facility to meet our design. In your letter to Metro, please explain what arrangements Frank Coluccio Construction Company has made with Gary Merlino to make the needed corrections to these MH's and how any costs attributable to the corrections will be covered. Very truly yours. Michael A. Paulson Construction Management IV MAP:map cc: Eddie Tate, 130 Sheldon Teel, SC File 10-1 1 03/05/98 THU 16:40 [TX/RX \0 76201 3—05-1998 5:43PM C# O 110 e� VO FROM FCCC NORTH CREEK 425 836 3957 )a��v Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle CtJ'� 821 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 ATTENTION: Mike Paulson - Resident Engineer SUBJECT: Cedar River Trunk - Phase II, W/M 07-94 Alley Manhole Repairs Dear Mr. Paulson_ 27 December 1995 W/M 07-94-011 P. 3 This is in response to your letter of 21 December (W/M 7-36) and our recent conversation regarding additional work at the alley manhole connections. The City of Renton correctly identifies a problem with the as - built versus design inverts at the subject manholes_ However, most if not all of the remedial work/adjustment required to make the system functional has been completed, Our discussions with Gary Merlino Construction indicate that no additional charges have been forwarded to the City of Renton and that none are forthcoming_ Any additional costs attributable to the corrective work �zll be the responsibility of GMCC and FCCC with no Change Order Request to either METRO or the City of Renton. If you have any, questions or require additional information, contact me at 287-1520. Sincerely, Alan R C - Project Engineer 9600 M. L. King Way South • Seattle, Washington 98118-5693 - (206) 722-5306 - Fax (206) 725-4764 - FR-AN-KC-C340L7 03/05/98 THU 16:40 [TX/RX ti0 76201 -- - Frank COIL Jo Construction C(-mpar�T�# SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT JAN 12 19M THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between Frank Coluccio Constructi([i1 '*&iC i y, Inc. hereinafter called the CONTItA(,1Y)It, and _ Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. 9125 - 10th Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98108 hereinafter called the SUBCONTRACTOR, WITNESSI.'I The CONTRACIY)R, for the full, complete and faithful performance of this SUBCONTRACT, agrees to pay the SUBCONTRAGII)R: (a) Lump Sum in the slim of One hundred fifty thousand two hundred and no/100----- ------------------- I)ollars ($ 150. 200.00 ), W and (b) Unit Prices as set forth below which on the basis of estimated quantities will involve a gross contract price of approximately One hundred severty-two thoursand thirty and no/100------------ Dollars($ 172,030.00 ) In consideration therefor, the S1113C0NTItA('hOR agrees as follows: 1. 1b furnish and perform all work as described in Paragraph 4 hereof, for the construction of Metro/Renton North Third Street Project for King County Department of Metropolitan Services hereinafter called OWNER, in accordance with the Contract dated the 1st clay of December 19 94_, between the OWNER and the CONTRACIptt, and the general and special conditions of said Contract, and in accordance with the drawings and specifications and addenda for said construction by King County Department of Metropolitan Services (F:N(IINF:F1?'S 4 ARCHITE(T'S NAME) ENGINEERS or ARCHITECTS, all of which documents in their ENTIRETY are hereinafter referred to as the MAIN CONTRACT and which have been made and remain available to the StAICONTIZAGII)R. 2. To be bound by all laws, government regulations, and orders, and all provisions of the MAIN CON- TRACT which provisions arc incorporated herein by reference and to he bound by the provisions printed on the reverse side hereof. 3. To waive any and all rights he now has or may in the future possess to claim a lien upon or to other- wise encumber the property to which the MAIN CONTRACT pertains or against any ret.ainage or bond created by or under the auspices of the MAIN CONTRA(T or this St1I3CONTRA(,T. 4. 71) provide all supervision, materials, labor, supplies, tools and egIffilient to fully complete the following: BID ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY /UNIT PRICE EXTENTDED AMOUNT R1 Mobilization/Demobilization Lump Sum $ 30,000.00 R2 Removal of Structures & Obstructions 8 �9CSum 20.00/CY 1 R3 RoadwayExcavation Crush Surfacing Top Course on3'ZUU R5 Gravel Borrow 335/Ton 20.00/TN 6,700.00 R6 As aft Concrete Pavement Class B 11ppp Ton 3355 TN 38 550 R7 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 110 Ton 47.SS/TN 5;175. R8 Pan ng Bituminous Pavement , R9 Cement Concrete Barrier Curb & Gutter 4250 LF 7.15 LF 30 387.50 R10 Cement Concrete Sidewalk 13399 SY 177 77SS SY 24, 77 SS R11 Cement Concrete A roach drivewa 3da 96S SY 23.00 SY 22 8 .0 RIJ Cement Concr to Curb Ramp 26 EA 275.00 EA 9 R Pavement Mar in s Lump,��Q.gg Sum U Ulu R14 Storm Drainage System Lump Sum R15 Irrigation System Lump Sum 32,000.00 R Planting Lump um R 7 Permanent Signing Lump Sum 3,200.00 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the CONTRACTOR and SUI3C0NTRA(7IY)It have executed this agreement, effective the Zsl clay of -J r-WU'q1r- /-�3-cam I lA'l'F: hyc AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE � CONTRAM)R G'X� WITNESS 9 S DATE 1 n[ORIZEU SIGNATURE SUBCONTRACTOR WITNESS FR-AN-KC-C340L7 �'�/n'► e e i�a /!'l CONTRACTOR'S REMSTRATPIN NUMBER SUBCONTRA ,rOlt'S REGISTRATION NUMBER SEE IN(;OIZIIOI? 'ITr) I'ROVISI()NS ON RI.VERSE SII)E WHILE. - CONIHAC10H CANARY ti1111CC)MRACT011 REV MIS P': newel •I.A 11u• `�l).•, (kll I Vf 11111 e F a duou In•v;fell V• • • 'IJM:It)ll all ribhgaUullt .Ind , .. syj Wall-- ,h31, fit,( 'ItI I I IN tOhad ksw 11 , a-menard life urn, [list MAIN COIII IIACI u., yr..k rr•nfI:A Nwn,o Ili•, I ........ nl Ihe',f1h4ahnn and lisp in. I , et likepait'es (A file SUR I d•INiAt I arJ lhr• MAlil :',ItIIIIA,.1. 11.,,. tiU1Wk. 11NIIACA 5.. .nn.nl IItst SIJHCONNIACTOR :..p•.osc s„'r •n as•agn ter %u w, ,,Va, I .,sty I) I"n1 of the fair In eland• rif life% SIInCONI RACT without %he S••'•' wr•p.•••. rntrnr nl the rf 1111 to AC IUII f.UR, .OtI IIIAC It If •.hall dnagnala in wnbng all lower II •.1 for (,rI I11M't(gl : ps tgNlinn, I, ,li .0' 1 than ixq suhw•rpm,ufly, hmnp. ....such fly, be, StAlcof1- ,nnv..n I (IN I I(nt:UHl 1;•q't,s'•.•11 the S011 .11ffillAC1(lfl will mutilate met assume Stiff u"rv�,cd,d,l y life fl„'rnnk pndo n; m' •• ,d Inv,••t ter SU11CONIFIAC1OnS, It shall be Site responsibilityIIM,IIISt In fond rtlq fna•e, tons 'AHIGONIIIAC.1OF1 to life SUnCONIffACTOR the settle as ill.. !;uP(:UI1111.1C I(In is hou11•1 to It I,UNIRAC1011 and the same as Itie CONTRACTOII to one„vufn (8) COMMENCEMENT AND PRO,RFS$ OF wonK Still,,'( IN I IIACILIn agsn.•. a. "pngdy v nil an•1 eedtenn She SCIUCONT nACT In She full and complete ,mhttat.een lot file C( It1111A(..IC111 ano ,,f Its,. Sowell 11. arcouhnq In life mquutments at be CON I nAC. It'll I. ,,,,..clue fell„ Srhsfdule ter •.• Iedriln, a•: CON I Stool may Ifrou limn In tune pnepa'a See'noddy :eel Sort I Iri ll,•! ti1111f,nf1111A1,InII lashes Iw,• p,) i Alnn rr days :dtef heir vl o JA,m1 by C.(N1T ITAC110R s(e In tits, Sl 1000N T nN: fOn agrees In cpttmen#,p aeAnal C( nkIniClu.n work hPleundefr at such INlfnl of points at file site of the work, of to nnh•,nr au, h nep•Irvl materials. amahes and pqugnnenl as and when tetpured. In such storage or work arras iN hlsdh at r ill 11 f1A(At Ill slay des- ttplasp, and fit Ifeereaflnr ronhnle dilogen[ly fit the peolonnance nl asp w 111 Is.Se•a..lips cos a% In fully r•+uq•L,h all fit said work 1(l the salistachfm of hulk [tie CONI iIAC Fills and Inn ("NIII I uI at. ten 64n,e w'tr. Ilse aforesaid %rholuies Ili•! tit IH('nN rlinrlOH chafe whenavPf mq.estosd so lo dJo by CONTRACTORI. prepare and submd to she I • )tRnnf:b)R Inc al,p,n.'d a puwpnr% %chwlule, let She foun of a per)g1Pss sham, to meal the ovs a% %h,r•: n by r null nACIOR ;; 11•Nt rufrnnl trmsImc uni s,'hohde, and Showing Ihn code! In which 1e,n tzl Ili( r)t 11(IAI TI Ifl junposPf. In I'al ty nos the walk„ flop date on whorls It will staff the several salient fear...... 1•n kWunq tlrawNKJ%. Into ten'mpnl of rn,llerlals plant and nquopripnl). Anti the contemplated dal•% Inc r•,npJet q Ihn same Set,, ;UfV:frtllnA( TOR shall wide on Itin chart Ilia Actual progress at less, ..rid ftf Par n month I,, at s' l It • dhn mt••ronl•. a, (1•11. Slid by Ihn (A )N I AAC10R from time to time. and shall %shell[ two rnpn•s In fife C014I11AI.Is lit S phtlnrl ,njep%wdAIIV0 If as Ihn npfmilo Mile CONTI IACIOII, file Sill K,ON I I IACiOfI falls behind link pingmss schedule, s, .no' nnlllnra'1n a,an o,wr :,, I, 's. 1,...s� :e • nrre•,c.uv hI ulgwnw• 1!u• SUI K,UN IRN:I pintpoes, 0 w,. , I ell Illn(.II kin m:q• mgilnp !, 111 , d 1111rd.11 /N In in, ,r'asI• Tile Ixl,nher of stills and/ter oven 1,/:1•..,f+^•al'rn5 days no walk Fie "volet, and/or naona%e Ihp Pquopnoenl oanjorwnr and/or I(ois tiling used m vi In •,-,bout Son Afpwnwal skirls suppl....... nl.uy Srhnclufe or kin ledulns as relay be necessary In •Iwnrncrmin mn oennr.e. nI wiw:h list. then Ind .asp of puNJress will I•o rnyallnd, All Without Additional r—I P, III,, rr1N111N,1011 in .•vinc:n,. ill lime IS.n oil IIIC ntJ I flea loll •:Imil I knot my subnal ro 1;(IPI IMrcTOR shop A1aW"ys aixl samples as are m pwild andll. ftnr••S5Ary in rod••, I„ p,dnon 111'. week elln'iently, expodihou%fy and III a materiel that W11 I'll ra...... dn•ay ,, Ihn pofq.nrs of 11w .,,is •d ill„ Coll I HAC101I n other SIIRCON111AC1(.)fiS In Ihn 1wa [ any at Is fi, nfnl •. ski It S1 llae W I fiAf; If )ll delay CON I RACI(ln in mepluu( ill% own •,nthri, I+sit .f hnthde on trial nl airy onipf ti11000NInACTY01 in file {erormancn of Isle work trndel true MAIN (,t)tl) ItAo. am result No r;ON I FIM .II III coMeet %WTICONI A/C." itc%ofng delay expanse to on•,onsod I pV%, of al ('OtIl RAC1OR tN•inil suhlnled In penalties of liabilities of dammges under Ise MAIN I IN FIIACI. SIIRC.OiJ 1nAC(()Il agar.. its indemnify And hell CON I..ACTOR harmless hum ally %tiI 10 Pnnalfees handdnkc :uNfkN damages, ant) to pnanpfly pay for CONI nAC; [Off any 5urh costs, f•Pnae.ns. 1•atald.oss ill damages so mrmr••rl inChidalg fnnSnrialdn attorney's fees tcd MOPEnAT10N Witt[ CONTnACFOn Atin OTHER StIDCONIRACTORS II— SI fill. .oil l f(M.I _0 I, at, h 11) rwppin compfeh• inhignabfin will) will$( In be pnrtorned by I.0I1111M.1f )n aaq ds mono Stlf 11'.()Il f I1M:l(lf t ; at lu hum, Petition anti schedules S(1(ICON I IIAC inn Shall hley,- ejo,:dn r.•.Ih rot I t I AS; IF and 11111nrs rnyayed III tire work on Ilia pro)rna, And %half net ,ntwlme will, lisp pnfhN.Tcenrn III mu Ir vnnA SI Of CON I CIA(, F011 shall list flier coudmatel its walk will, ors• w•„k 0 (:)NI(IN,*10fl and CIS nlhpr•: .it Thal the week of Vito Stelae pooled may be pnefoottod •+•nil Ihp utirs.•.I sfnod rolsPes's .0. (1­1 1 Ino, nue In rase ill conlbrl. of any Jointer reason for cot- Ihnalmfl. CI INIf1ACIOn may door 1, stood lit 434;O14 If IACTOR will thereupon irnmediately execute, nos, ess�afy r(cod,nahon list She peolurneapcp o1 #,often% work, even at mctea%ed expense to the SUH- t f+III AACIOR wdloul G0tlI$IN ll tl few-nia.g liability lhnrekN SURCOtJIF1ACTOR And its enptloyoas •hn'I %in fly nhcn,ve and cnnply W.Ih Iuy anrf All ftilps tequlatNos and aec'tdenl prevention I)rnyfams ryaruulgnled by M-IIJFn in CONTIIM:1On in Try Any (p),flremnntaf Italy lot She safe, orderly and Pihbnbl t nndud nl Ile Wuk (0) PAYMENTS -upceo 11nACTOR shall sUbm,i 10 Ihn CON IFIAC1OR apphrateons to payment at such reasonable moos as In P,,ahte 11rkkCOIITnA('1(in to hnwly apply lot afad obtain payment horns the OWNER CON- InAGInn sh:01 wdhl•rdel onflustap brow flip SNIICONTRACTOn in a percentage otplal to that winch Ill• (A:glF.n wsthbolAs ben Ue I:nfJ I flAlanll Ilnfainad lands an rim rfinsuAa#ed due and owuly to tin !iUOC• HJ 1 flACll)n uotd final paymenl l lemtnro, no interest will he pawl to Ilia SUI)CON 1 nACTOn ,••) rntaoe,t funds Net CONI HA( SOWS nbbgauon to release relenllon atsel make final payment to the Sl IhCnN 1 f 1 W10R Shall is. Suhlect lu peNif that there ale no) unpaid claim% which would ptovkte life 1"". Sol a lien agalnsl She plennsps, irleennin to Payment Isond. and adlall finthe# tie subject to (1) :vdnl„salnul of 5u11n.enl hinds, And 11) lufnislung an adequale and sufficient payment and performance o adnqualply protect CON IIiACtOP agauesl thud party claims SI1nCONTRACTOR shall be paid " .rid. h' dim Ila!r•..I civiTnArp',((? la••s tnI•gn••, i•snmy dal,• its apponvrol by the A11C1lliFC1 0, T 11. ,it IF f R wulnn ten I Sill rlays .lfe•, Cf I( 1111AC T, it I ton•: iPCPwAd his payment Ins Surh pteeytes% bell u 1 seal o,d•; ra„a 1n. •.work ,rtrk,r lips 4;11110 III I I4A(,1 Shall he made within ten (10) days allot# Idle rI I It's, 11 If I hac i (a,vn,i Ius h„nl l,I remr*,w imyleeni. 1) vkded the SO IBC0141 RACIOR has Toed ;I'll rn,nm"w"Vs +,'•pf "•yam[ its Ivda rkimv P of III- work Payneo for All work Gems will be based upon "Iss ,poanigs"s aPp", n 4 and earl list by If,,, 0WI41 11 Pu>4ceSs paymenl% shill[ he doomed advances a"d .fen SWIV. 1 V, a.qusmoml AS ally pen.• rs"nr Its Saint pnympnl In( peons, (wmpaymflud, of dun to CON I I1AI,Tt )N c; gcnd 11.11, d,!IPn nu,.lUrin fhal file. temainnq balance of payments may too arsuffMsen[ to f nmph•hon of the Silll('(IN111AC1 work in arcchlanck, with its terms or w pay hall rounwil d.vnayPc I" bind ria,ns1 II UN• , onbael 1--hosPP,. nWNFII And COH111AC1011 pennds payinmil lot m;,Wmds I,•1.vn -d In Je fill) can n. I,. sabsfa. hay oflmtle facddms. S11nCON I RMAO(1 may invoice Imo kow'.als kin delivered and rnrewe paymenl Iheielo, as mdhnod in Ile MAIN CONTRN:I. Pn('Vli)L U. IIOWFVFn INfl all stir if slnr„d snafWtotS;half tell rut Ile rink nl the SUnCONinflCion until COIL IIIA(aUn S acr'nptanrn ill for.. tifill!:(rtl mo wok SUf1C0NInACa011 shall lntdy the ('11NIIIAI'rt In 0 any ats,yr... moil 1d flip pen PPdf. 0 Short SURCONIIIACI prior k) such asslgllelem and shall mqune Iho arceplAnt r Iry nsSeynpe nl Ihn Imes ill Ihrs SUnCONTRACI, ocludufy Ilse nhbga- Join It,, ailluchnenis and retoun Is• (A ISIS I1Afa011 of ovelppyrhents Padial payments for work (ndmnte l maler Iho% agorae i end well equal tiro current certified vadun of file eokk done riv Ihn S1 M1.;0NJ 11N, II III at III- atyeV,J porn Ins.% life slim ill previous payments and )nee A nstame'l goswenimpo a% f u,irniPd Ihnvn, InOVIDI 1), that d Shot S(111CONI IIAC1On is uldebled If, "I- CI 10111ACI(1N n/ anynnn its.. It. talon. Inngft iN,ngIJS, holes, supplies, mn[efrals, oqufpmmnt Sev'lal ter "dhnr portion Ibatgnt IyMn•:1 Ihn. wok awe'ed by lifts S11(1(.UIJII1ACF Atpnnnem, flee also( it ,d an b u,deb!n,lnnts #,say tin dn'lurint by fire C( n11nAC1011 Imo any payment en payments made urde, Sons I ..rnsuin m weds of u) pan, a, t; OfJINAG TniI'Ci s(tfl eber.Uon PFIOVInFO, FU11f b1Efl, Ihae -Ios (.()tl l n AI, IOn tray bone line In Ilene o•Ilnan and Sl1fiC.e )H I fJA(.:fI )fj Shall ponm(ddy plovwfe a Stae rent it, wfrl•ng SPll.fiy Smile whal aim Nltlls, ,1 ,After ;fit, flee no payable by SIMCON I nACI0n In Thud f.m•gnc Sol, IAh I, final,• hpnnlds taxes, n.alrnuls egrip if ropo)I tee supplies In C,Nalacloon wilt[, or Sensing „NI nl ❑,, i,wlnrmanco of the 51111(:0NIIIACI. ant I,,n cONInAGI0fI may withhold Iron any pay n.«ref. Partial o, anal, (OprWse .loop louder tiffs S116C.01J111ACT, such sums as the CONTRACTOH rn Asna,bly nwv dn,nnfine a,,, nnrrssa,y I•) •+ecu.n and luoWl else CON I IIA1 [Oft or flip (ANN11 t loons r eaunc n• rse•,: Thal may lu, as'no"d to, •cord fled [,.Sties (El CLAIMS FOR EXTRA WOnK If ,! (1 n) I FIAr;pn may wah, a v,vde lao it trp- SI11)(:)NTRACT, nldet in willing ra to wook ors make rhanooss hV ahpnny. adding In. ter ,1rdu' InNI hurl the work, and life SIJIICONTIIACf price shall be .A tlusb••1 is o,mlod All ..urh ­,1, as he n.,•culed nettles She comlehiats he#aof and ill title MAIN CON IRAI'l e.r "I it'll any clauns Inc nten}u.n (If lime ..augpd nletphy olusl be. agreed Illenn a1 life Tillie ill svdp•u,g ar,rh chano•, The Si It WON] 11 AC R)i1 strait masso no Claims In exiles unless the same shall •n agmed ul•eu m advau, n u1 wnlnNJ by trm (', 111 I IlA(anfl. pool In [he Iprlotmflnre ter any such exits ,,Ia, III,- RIIl1C0N I IIA(;RIH agme5 In ways :tor,rl.en In, extra conipensahore if It falls to give specific wi•fepn tx..:rP In fhn i'(AN Tnnr TOO Punt •.+ rnm,nr•,cr: n:•nt n! Ihn rlalmeA e;ba WoJ: In case tii dory I'cpnr •s •+, e, 'le adp.%pr nftl rs11hP 1 asI !LA Ijil I It I I IAs' II NI shall prrv-ped willi lie walk and She dispose ...ill ton recnh„d u• I' cnefanr •• Wdh fhn I, ., • ,1-ar sal list It u, lisp MAIN CON I114(;1 In Ile ex ono that 1st, I't IN I f lAr.11 111 ,s Ni fit I^e kin h pr•u View , ntrlerwWe hV m1l,lialon As ;nI holh ill Paumg.aph (U) (I') CLAIMS OF SUDC0tI1RAC10n AGAINST OWNER If SI IHC0NTf1ACfOR shaft claim Shall it is e0000 in Ndthhl,aosl crrornnsnlion or damages by reason -•t auy a, I to, pn,f%swlrr of 01NNf fl in fill who h 0W11Fn is responsible tin any (Telly caused by any act 11 lsux<su)n nl OW NF Il, SI MCON 11 JAC IC 1(1 s ri 111 p.njoinly subsuch C' md latms lot wnlmt) Sol O CN I RAC If,flaIndC0NIRACIOnm.fynn halufllol SlMCON I IIAC(On sul W 1horlanntoOWNFH SCIRCON I f1AC1On ayrnnr. not In rnnldrt any'mprpc.Nflown ui QWNFn req:udulm the Sll(ICON inACl ter MAIW 'OrjI11A('[ Wntk e.cep) Shuu)yh n with OvmntP wnllon approval from CON TnACTOR In Ill. n,,e,,l Still lie (VINEII shall acl,all, pay, ail,hfsonal rompensahtn of damages to CONTnAC- Ipll by ,rams rl SIIRCONTRACTQn S rl; n.s. the COPITRACTOn will pay file same, less CON iRAC- 1VR S Prpnn•-ns of any, to SIIBCO141HAS 10n In Ihn eynr,l that OWNFH fPlusps Ils miss telci-nahle leyment toCONTnA(anR oil behalf of SUB 'Otll fU(: R 1f1 d app(npnale, i'OW 111Af.1(II1 I!.ry )"m,rM loch claun In Uo nlMlnpnAln caul, :ubilo)tor ynpn irlenry m ors name oil hehall ill SUFu f11J I fIM :1(d) d reasilnahly fnquesl,d by Sl1nCOf1I IIAC TOR Sllfll'nNIf1AC1Un shall nvynIll" (,,,I .If, I:k)r I f I SAC It fed All slops!:(kenm rolnnden wild ldul plasm an,I %.call IltellarP +Jf See' n%s.t,y • „I.,f'.'n:ng hale and dm all..the, Rene% neto%saly to preseuf ta'd clae. ri'lpe•ly, null •h.Il..mml4n S^ IIt) I IIAC foist Ilse p•IPn%P5 ulctmed by m u1 respect of any inch Claim rot any Antolini mandril un,let'surh fan-opd,nc(s. fife CONFRM1011 in Addition to expenses. thall he entitled in liflo-n lits"Pat (IYI,.) III Ih,. xMal auu raft wI rollncmd, .first relay w[Slohnld this anettnf 'tom SURt'(g1111ACTOd1 in anv way ('()fI INAI,101t I;net fit (r.) NATURE OF WORK SUBCONIFIACTOn has by exarmnabnn of the site. and All of flip MAIN CONTRACT documents, fall ed homsell as In the nAlute and Itcatxm of Ihp work, lite cha(arei, quantity and Soviet of malaoals rr be ParmullPlnf of suppinkd file Cementler. mind And quanlify of equpanent nnndwl din nq life pros. •ruhnn at lisp w'nsk flip. kv'alton rond,rinns And Mile, mallets who( If can inany manner affect life work mdpi Iris agraen.enl Son veobal lgroemetd wnh any agent evlbet betake nor Idler She execution of this (n,ennln' 1 %hall aged at noddy auy of list, tines o, abllmalinnr heipin rolllanlnd, arts) (tees conliar,[ %11a11 In r err lu,x•nly d••Pnhrd In conlam and e• pets .111 11111,0, IruP% and rnNhhnns ayoewi ujon by lisp. pa, I'es IerMn 1;1.IIW( ItirnACII 1st' 1 u .••rip'. 11, 1, .. I, 1„11, n.pw u'nred And li mpe'ly (Imild • I as an exist"] p„I.111.1 Ihn rlacJ,. ✓L p,. ".0, '1 h....... l u,.1 oil d d r. rsu J.'•dy I•,j„rpl,ll msf),❑u.r.l and Imam Pit 1, w•Yf 1, III . 1' u, ,m ,,• I o• hill W. anvil w. 111a.11%lb'd W uulanuftly delnal. ••eve : .... ... d,l (AIIIIIIAr1011 and OWIJI If hamdpss ban A demand, u)xl of expense, Ire tuley's lees an"Inq nut ill Any art ta•Ilromfld, a made, by SUTICOtI1nACI(I Nlfinnaorp of any wool, hee ln,of (11) SUBCONTRACTOF.....,. LUYEn SUDCON I HAC1011 shall Comply wnh Iho Wayr' 1.110 and hoq u'tequupmnols of life MAIN CONTR SURCONIRAClul1 has 1hr• 5lalus SeI letampintw as ,,,-1 1 by III,, lwfoshml Instilance, VlAwkmen C(NIIINetsal,onl fill[[ I (I NIIIIIhlyllll•111 CIxlpWllSafe•'11 N I `.v f,d I:V, ndl rwa,dina sumfar arts at fee halneal, slain and lostal gcwpnunet,f SNRCON ILIAC 1011 will wrihhtoo l is tint w. payomlt life applicable So%prat Se, holy taxes. Wosisluells 11il1rtj N•t15A111N 1, Ulentph.yne.11 Comil.ensalsc 11, 1'•.e11ninsloul% Held wltilloIldlnq IMPS, and pay the same, and left, C014f nACTOn shall of no way lot liable as an enpdnyet lei tit on arrrsunl of any of Ilia enlplityees of lie SURl;O1N nACTO11 Ilelnie tonal paymaol Is moan upon Iflfs SI1nG1 )fL TnACI, SURCON111ACIOII shall lutnish sal.nlaclmy mvutnurn fo Ilea ('t)NIIIA(:10fi Thal hp leas cncl Scorned to killed laws, lutes a.Nl uppda4ens the StJRCONI(1N', tort lull Phy Imposes to ill tormenter lisp C! It T11AC1014 Ill any and all handdy under cUCh laws ausmlf hostel Wulf po,loomed under Ihls slsn(•Ot) TIIACI life SUBCnt1111ACIO11 shall hectiono spill on..,a,11 s!gnalw/ w•th 1 a1N,t OTgi nrratrtins whirl, flavor junsdit'unn M wnhoa raquucd by the, SIIO(Y )tl I IIAI'1 Aq„eU14•1.1 (1) PERMITS, TAXES The SUDCONf RACIOR strait Sermon And pay to all pemns teas And licenses necessary lot Ili,• perloonao:e ad lite SUDCONIHN:I Joint shall pay Any And all deunlal. stale and 11unA:+pal lazes In, frilling sales taxes. 11 any, lot which the SUDCON I f1ACln11 may be hahlu n. canymq oul the. SUBCONI nAt.I (J) MATERIALS A1AIm,als JMrvnn•d by ter for Ihp SI IRCON f nAGlnll and ullmaled lu bfl u)cn,pof BlnA mid Ihr vvnk herelindel Strait losasain cal the Kill slip and shall bp,:oflka j oyledy d file OWNEH upon paymen, All scallulding, apparatus. ways. Willits, nlaclfemmy ansl plan) brnuyld upon She piemises by life 511111'.O!l iRAIaOR shall renlrn Sl1R(:OtJI nN;T011'S peopfa#ly. 11u1 m Caste ill uuedily SU flat later. and Ihn r pm ptehnn of walk is do to by lite CONTTIACion of In, auetit. lisp (:ONTRACTOR shall he pnldl,ld nil ucn file salt scalloldony. appafatus. Ways, wails. IIIdClitle(V..NI to list w,11"A.1 .eill...MI Uf I.Alld,fv Son JPlaw .a bon or damage by such use. and w llaoul p#nindeco, lot C(IN III No .1011's mhel fruit[% of mmedu•s if. a,., dan%agir n of loss susland by rpacnn il% l wr1 mabddy 11 shall ton trip kit Ind :OI1111ACTO11-S ies(onsdohly to unload, store and pm1•,cl ties nlalenals or rnalnualt It p:hpd In loan Ilia SURCOUIRACIOH shall )ear the risk of Ines tleltlni and %hall In"I1K.1 16,'It ml''1^I[ill a4tlln',11mi%'[till acinally Ine'lipolaw d .•Tin Ihn work And Ili, v:n h a„ ppled, even Ihnugh bdln Ih,•I. t', I.— I •,silkily lmvn pasf ed IJo rise (RVI If If Undpt Ilia pre#,ednlp plevismtls (K) TAKEOVFR St IRCON 111N• IOR ^•ball cot upon p aid of all INnnS "ally Ili,, pcvl(NIII Awl conspl•,le Sher SI rRCCIfI 1f1ACI to Ihn lull Anti cunpdnlis salicLaioon est Ihn 17ONInM:1011 And .d Ile ARCI111fClif rtr;INL1 11 I„ 0WNf n 11 Is cFolcslcal)y und,nshltNf And m p"d flirt us the e.nril tbal flip CONIIIA0011 Molise al any false bo III file gfxvl 13.111 nI Ion', allot c1•n41111.1h,Ne halt, lisp 'IIRCUN111N'If lfl. that filet Still CONTRACTON is first Into oedinq will. J,bya x'0 and lemgrestftuj u. cur h .t n'anoer'first with adlN Inns wulkels les for ::mfetlac Itinly' enlpletn the wank wdlpol If.,- mqpd Ivors, rf d this Still( 0NIHA1:1In •J1n[I fad foconnr 1. n•{dal.• no n• else' mp, laldlynl del'.0.vn w...s •1'^s,• .'s al.11 ll, [.....,sold Sendps 11.0% SS III CONIIIACI as .say he sell, file tense Utters to 1.1110 by Ili, I tot IIHAC1U)i Ilion CI INIJIM,I(1N shall have Iho right alter a wnilen cnvell (7) ralnndat day Slither to, `d if W0N I ISM. IC nl In lake oves She •W.l,k anal to conmtelo lien sale• as file ( list And evPm.so fit din !4let,(IN I IIA,1.10f 1, wolo.l udos,h„tn•rp llpm SURCONI f 1A(' Intl and wdhnid ptmjesrp Its She CONJ IIACP di'141111qfN .....+.•des Sn oq ins, of damage sust.ulaNl In Shp evilest of noisiness ntel V vw(lb:nuJ n!.k of lots on n4uly W Pesocftn ill pffrper.y, au411y {N nil nil an arhlat lakpfevp, 1 a vF11I IN:11 ll1 IIMy I:un ilp(Nnfm:11P ar limn 1U mN1Nlnll' SIf1'il a-n ,qe,w V and relay Ch:oge SO ICON1HN: inn Ini •dl rncl% Nu ulfpd oI qn h felon[ u,lsn Cu,vu Nis drm us'N ,n PI•• on S11{1(.0Nff1ACI0II Still Irilhrv.eA by a labvrw!r sbae f„N 1•e .l".....rid a '..uvrl ill ( 1 11111Af Is oil 1, ugh[ to do kin (I ) INDEMNIfICAF10N Ihn sUDCUNIIIACIUII agtntis It, nnienuuly. dolond and •:ern Ninnies•; The• ("ONIFirst 11111 of-; officers, agems anti enlliII hom :Ind a.tlaloW any; 1 .II habddy ..I. lud."g. well,....[ hnmuulsn. cell, clauns. Actions. IJoScns. costs. d6nla(Its, ppr'nll#p5 no e.len•;ors nl r•,•n, y knN a.u1 naln'P Inc hoof I ru.el coiss[s, 0.1'e,I5e5 And Seasonable alouley % lopsl caused toy, lA oft I Isom u,su.4 uuf nl m rnrion, Ilu. Willi on o ckMmal In Ihn SIIM:call RN•FUII'S {Nt,kananrp nl tit!:. }s 111, A il,1I IIM:1 Illlh•S%, :It15f•il %I. Inly by the naghyenl arts of onussemis Of Ibe, CILN 111A(:II In. d% anise; In pmpluyees nv Use coot I 1 fens Indeninihcalion pmvinton. the `;URrONinAcom warn, ai,y nm.nnly will, 1e%(e,l ill Ida.. I ivs InACTOn, Ito Slosh it p qh/t ln�1 ►bmwisTlP71 ye-I�!Itlled uudot Ilia InlInSln l Inseanre Act 0 Ihp'far, ,d and, poterell as Aforesaid with fesped 11) 11Abi11 a'rasionell by She slue repoininnce Ill CONIIIACK111, indemnify CONTRACM11 Inc a y and all liability as set Irofh above, o'.casefeml by Ihn Ir I andsn, concu#renl nellhgenre ill OWNFR. CONTIIACWHI andor SIIFICOIJInACTI)n (M) UNIT PRICE In Itie event this SIIRCONfHAC1 cowains feel price. stories, it .s umlei Slood and agmed trial any quantities mentioned are appooximalo aNy and sublerl In r,hangn as utpmed by lbe MAIN CON I I I AGI and as ordered and dnected by lute CONTIWIOR (N) MATERIAL QUALITY Materials condemned by Shot CONTRACTOn, ARC111TECUF.NGINr3in of OWNER as {ailing to Col Tom In the MAIN CONT 1(ACT, wnkpd a, one Mall topn!I v.)d•Nf ter mbar notice ton immensely remu, oil by the SItnCOf11nAClnf1 fadmoid Ihn GUMTIIA.:Np1 re unmp.balely rornlrne Vuy work ors paj.. Ap, as inslalMN1 shall line o% any way waive Ihr (*.(III I JIM, [(41 S ogihl m) ti14n11 IIW.Ipto at any SillISFquenl bee (0) JOB DAMAGE Job damage rauee.d by sl IncON rnAC1Un for wnf (letter than ties awn Shall be felenlled Immeilsalply to CON InACTOiI. and SI1tl1.ON I IIA('10n shall be rrscpnuso.. Ise flt ,ppan lob damage r ansad fly CON 1 HAC10t 1 fen wiltk of St llIGON I HA(•1011 %half he r,tor Ipd In III- SUBCON 1IIAC, lOf 1 and (:Off 1nACf0F1 shall ba responsebin log .I% lepau (P) IJOUSEKEEPING S1IRCONIF[AC1Un shall sequlatly and p mnlafy ommi)vp all mh.sp, waste! and (leans pooluce•1 fly Ills npoonallal Hetusn shall Sent life pann111.1d to Arr.femulala In )feu e.lftnl lleal .1 interferes Well, I ... P access In Ilia work still tit becomes unsightly Cnnyus,u u'e WIh all saloly rpgourelnnnls of filled Iloasukeepuiq" is of, es'•sonhal Seat[ of S1 Id1CONInACII-If I S obligabol In Ilea event of SU1111n111 RAC FOR'S failure After nnhhcalaul or felusal to meet 11106t! ..•quueulpnu5, fellme mneval may be chins by CONFRN710n and charged against lite accotow ill the ;UHI:nNiRMaOn (0) BOND S011CONiF1ACT011 shall hanish In the CONTRAC10i1 pprlunnance. and paympnf suety bonds acceptable to Iho CONTRACTOR In an amallll pypeal Sol lisp final contract price., Conditioned at and coveting the dadbad pndcomanre ill. mid compliance wills all life tenets. (Nrslsons and coafllons of this roolmcl, And payunknl la all Wake, materials, aqupnnen[ and supphns usal tit the pmsocuhan oil Ibe work l uwwlnd halms SUOCntJ I RA('TOn Mfall nil, nfch such hinds wdhul en (101 et.gs ill Set: ell" of this S111i1;0N I RACT SAM tionds will remain .n hill ltwcp ano ellPta bnni m,• ('Ate of lh,% S11110 IN IIWT thlnugh [he expirahun of the MAIN CON IAM I wananly Sensual (R) WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION SIMICON F IIA(;JOn shall harsh In Cott[neirinn pvulwl Is Thal ton Iraq ,I louse Wneknen ; Cnfrn pensalon Insiname including Empioyn's I. mhdily. as relay be lequspd by She list lsducbrol too junshc loons in which life walk's being (eolmmed Policy linuls shall not he less than life Nnthly Inpoy himis required by the MAIN CONTHACI but tit no eve it loss than;S(N?n110110 Surh evidence n1 m%niAnco may 1-4 in the Insist oil an Insurance Cefldicae .%sual by an ulsumr sal.Slarlmy to Ills CON 1 nAV 1011 And sbalt ppowdo Iw fine loss than test (bl) days' nlslfce h. COt11IIACI0n .d canrel.nlN.n or ..it,,, limn hf ccwosage In live evonl SURCt'H I f1AC.1011 laritsn ucunlaul any elsoanc.e requdell by (toss M 1111,I )tl I HACI and ltlu MAIN CON MAC I m Flown (lunar# Ihp posh— Id,! n, Ibm Stln(I )l I J HA(; F. (.(lfl I I JAI: TI )O may At Ills options pulchas , such ufsumnce in Ihn nit,, is kid Y10(, t4f1IACi0R And decfurl lisp ro••1 of same horn payments due SUDC(IITRACTOP, e, if.•,n imainagn, at CONTRA(aOH S notion (S) INSURANCE SURCON TnAC1011 shill obdam mid kflop tit I acn d,umg the Inns ill the MAIIJ COf 1IfUCT, public liability And INnpefly damalJfi IIISIII a.ICp with Ce1'elmge equal In for, IifP.Alo, than. Ilse mirunntfi sler.ohwt at )he MAIN CONIRACT fie StlRCotlIIIACTIAI shall luuush I .III,- I .ONIIIACTOR evidence of this Insurance as oil the same Suuns dr,srnhnd in Px.,,j,anh (fit Stu.h .n ,sranre shall mdu.aw !hat '! to l wtp„'t"A'arrual IsahJdy cnvmagr! appb";lhb• w tit, ,ahem....4 .- us,s.ons of This SI IRCOri niM.7 flop SOW.01`1IRAIA011 Shaul I.w 1 (:()NInAIA(l11 So-so (14a days' ..,,floor of a..annrtahon (T) MODIFICATIONS NSe murldreabml tit Ilu, oJoeoount and net waives ill rosy lrghls [root# I [Iles a4iflef11Plil shall hp valid a binding on live parlors uness the same tie At willing And ssunell by the patty to be charged Failure ill Ibe Ci .NTnACI011 its a,%,,[ upon since paduunanre ill lisp !;UlK ON IRACi. fir lu plows .,sn anv opwm helms coullare,l 1.1 any arm oI moto ..w.1A11 tee, Shall I.c•1 be .ten ;b Unll for ton p wawai nl any %ut h. n ally olhe# c(aeilaws'n a!ps:ennnl1%. but Ihp salsa shall is(- and ,man. on lull here And pile, S (U) ARBITRATION Any conlnwo,sy u, I: hum atle,:lu nl only CONTnACinft Anl SI1111CON1 flACT(1t1 ,And ansmil eul 0 or totaling ill this SUBCON I IIAC 1, in flip. breach thereof. shall by reflood tit acconlance. with file now most mcenlly lnvised edition 0 [he Consburtonn Indutlry A,Mllaton Rums of life American Adobahnn Association, The contents of which are mrapooalerl rise eul by r0poencts This SURCONTHACI shall by merprwed and Ilia 10IN and If.1 11ec fit life pallw, h.-! h, Shat! 1). Sdrionnulfel tit acundann write She laws nl life Slam of x �! and any and all sull% fill any And every install, of this !7Un(:()NlllACr ter no any matinee meany nut of Ih,% titMC/Ot1111A :I shall In ai%ltluted ,floor /"landanted of. likeSul'anno Cuud of inn Slain CA )! ( ISf////IV6 _ ll!l M.. _ .... ._. --'---.-- with venue laid m (V) SEVEIIARILITY In the event that any pirwision of Sills `t11RLONINACI shallal wq Rue rontsavene o whelp o1 in partally applicable fe(lmal of slate law, onhnancP, mbnn ev fpguhmow Often such plosion shall lemaul in ellecl only to Ile extent (ennoltpd. and Ihp teinauunm pmiviswd,s hpeol shall ren)am ni full furl n and effect (W) COMPLEIE AGREEMENT This document contains all Iovenanl% stipulations aml pu.v.,anw agiptsd open fly lisp paSe)oss No, agent of repnespol:dwe rot e'[het pwty has Auslorty In mail•. And lisp pwinis shall 11,4 tor• Io.ond Iry to be- liable for any tclalo nenl uyur•%w dohs), pmnuS, ter agiectnenl retie sell lodh horenn ties rhariyes anfenalnarnts too nu.d.h'atmm. cd the Trim, hemul ,hall Sri- tiniest tp:fi , ed In ,vnnrnj a,0 e,gnnd by Ili.• pa,hnS as an a .... I Ins,ns So' Ills, ,r III, _(off lnAf'I In I 11 ••, a CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: December 22, 1997 TO: Larry Warren VIA: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: Dave Christensen SUBJECT: Marianne Hirschfeld Lawsuit We have received a copy of the complaint for damages filed by Marianne Hirschfeld against the City, Frank Coluccio Construction and King County Metro. This action occurred during the time that King County Metro was contracting with Frank Coluccio Construction for the replacement of Metro's 42-inch sewer interceptor, and jointly with the City, the reconstruction of North Third Street. The City and Metro entered into an agreement for the above -mentioned work and a copy is included for your reference. The complaint fled by Ms. Hirschfeld was the result of work performed by Frank Coluccio Construction for Metro on a portion of the City's system. To the best of our knowledge, City staff was not present to witness the incident. Metro was responsible for the inspection of the project. The City was only responsible for oversight and final acceptance. I have asked Rick Kokko (City's Inspector) to check his diaries to determine if he has any further information regarding this incident. The only contact that we recall regarding this incident was when a claim was filed against the City, we were contacted by Risk Management, and we informed them that the contractor was under contract with Metro, not the City. City staff involved with this project were Dave Christensen and John Hobson from Wastewater, Rod Schindler from Transportation, and Rick Kokko from Public Works Inspection. Please let us know if there is any additional information that you need. H : DOC S:97-1163: DMC: ps CC: Ron Olsen CAG-95-002 - UTILITIES COOPERATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND KING COUNTY FOR METRO'S CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT - PHASE II AND CITY OF RENTON'S NORTH THIRD LIVABLE STREETS PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between KING COUNTY a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter "the County"), and THE CITY OF RENTON (hereinafter the "City"), a municipal corporation of the State of Washington. WHEREAS, in accordance with a memorandum of agreement (hereinafter "MOA") executed June 6, 1991, the County plans to construct a new 42-inch sewer pipeline between Burnett Avenue North and Brooks Street as part of the Cedar River Trunk Relocation -Phase II (hereinafter the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the design and installation of the new sewer line requires the reconnection of the City's local sewer system at numerous points along the route of the Project; and WHEREAS, the City would normally require restoration of the street surface as a condition of permits for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City desires to make street improvements to North Third Street between Burnett Avenue North and Factory Avenue North as part of the City's Livable Streets Project and in lieu of the aforementioned street restoration, has requested that the County share the cost of said improvements and substitute the improvements for the restoration work that the County would otherwise be required to undertake; and WHEREAS, the City and the County have agreed that the County's Department of Metropolitan Services (hereinafter "Metro") will manage and construct both the new sewer line and the street improvements and that the City will compensate Metro for construction activities related to the street improvements and storm drains. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the provisions and conditions set forth herein, it is mutually agreed by and between the City and the County as follows: - 1 - 1. DEFTNITTONS For the purpose of this Cooperation Agreement, the terms underlined in the numbered paragraphs of this Section 1 shall have the meanings set forth to the underlined term. 1.1 City - - The City of Renton, Washington, a municipal corporation. 1.2 City Engineer - - The staff engineer assigned by the City to carry out the responsibilities set forth in this Agreement. 1.3 City Project Manager - - The individual assigned by the City to carry out the responsibilities set forth in this Agreement. 1.4 County - - King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington. 1.5 Contract Documents - - All documents, including those referenced therein, set forth in Contract No. W/M7-94 between County and Contractor. 1.6 Contractor - - Contractor hired by Metro to construct the Project pursuant to Contract No. W/M7-94. 1.7 Director - - Executive Director of Metro. 1.8 Final Plans - - The plans and specifications set forth in the Contract Documents. 1.9 Implement or Implementation - - Plan, design, construct, operate, maintain, regulate or otherwise manage or take action to carry out the Project. 1.10 Metro - - King County Department of Metropolitan Services. 1.11 Metro Director of Technical Services - - That individual who directs and is responsible for the actions of Metro's Technical Services Department personnel who are officially assigned to the Project. 1.12 Metro Project Manager - - The individual assigned by Metro to carry out the responsibilities set forth in this Agreement. 1.13 Metro Resident Engineer - - The staff engineer employed by Metro who is responsible for technical coordination of the Project. -2- The parties agree that time is of the essence in the construction of the Project and agree not to hinder or delay the Project schedule. Metro agrees to transmit within 24 hours (counting only working days) following receipt, the updated schedules which are submitted by its contractor for review by the City. Any updated schedules so reviewed by the City supersede the preceding schedules. The parties further agree to meet at least weekly, with or without the Contractor being present, to discuss schedule information for the purpose of mitigating conflicts and facilitating planning. Metro has prepared, by and through its in-house engineering staff, plans and specifications stamped and dated August 1994 which describe and specify the requirements for the construction of the sewer line work. The City has prepared, by and through its in-house engineering staff and/or consultants, plans and specifications stamped and dated July 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "City Plans"), which describe and specify the requirements for the construction of its North Third Livable Streets Project. The City Plans were incorporated into the Metro Plans for purposes of bidding, contract administration and construction, and are part of the Contract Documents. The combined plans are defined herein as the Final Plans. Metro will act as the lead agency in the Implementation of the Project. Metro's Resident Engineer will be the primary contact with the Contractor. The City's Engineer shall direct all communication to the Contractor through Metro's Resident Engineer including all requests for field adjustments, correcting deficiencies, and/or implementing design changes as required. Metro's Resident Engineer will evaluate the changes in consultation with the City's Engineer, identifying any potential contractual issues that will need to be addressed before directing the Contractor accordingly. A. City. The City agrees that it will compensate Metro a sum of $161,115, equal to 50% of the Original Contract Amount excluding sales tax for construction of that part of the Project commonly referred to as street improvements to North Third Street between Burnett Avenue North and Factory Avenue North for which the City prepared or had prepared the plans and specifications ("City Plans"). The City further agrees to reimburse Metro $20,000 equal to 100% of the Original Contract Amount excluding sales tax for construction of storm drains which are shown in the -4- needed. Said punchlist shall identify the corrective work needed with specificity. When Metro has completed the work identified on the punchlist, it will request in writing, a re -inspection from the City. Within five (5) working days of receipt of said written request, the City will inspect all work and, if needed, again prepare a written punchlist of work not completed, which it will transmit to Metro within five (5) days of said re -inspection. Said punchlist shall identify the corrective work needed with specificity. The process shall be repeated until all work has been completed, at which time the City will prepare a written Notice of Acceptance and transmit same to Metro. Upon the date of notice of acceptance by the City, the City will assume ownership and maintenance responsibilities of the City's sewer lines. The City shall assume ownership and operational responsibilities of reconnected local sewer lines once they are providing sewer service. The City shall be the only one to operate those sewer lines once they are activated. L-*2 All work on the North Third Livable Streets portion of the Project will be warranted to be free from defects in design, workmanship and materials for a period of one (1) year following the date of Notice of Acceptance by the City; provided this warranty shall not cover design defects in the plans prepared by the City or the City's agent. N�\ • The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 9.1 To the extent allowed by law, Metro shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, employees and agents from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, losses, costs, expenses of litigation, attorney's fees, penalties, and damages of whatsoever kind or nature arising out of, in connection with or incident to an act or omission of Metro, its employees, agents, and contractors in the performance of Metro's obligations under this Agreement. In the event of litigation between the parties to enforce the rights under this section, reasonable attorney's fees shall be allowed to the prevailing party. This indemnification provision shall include, but is not limited to, all claims against the City by an employee or former employee of Metro or its contractors and, as to such claims, Metro expressly waives all immunity and limitation on liability under Title 51 RCW. M All notices issued under this Agreement shall be deemed received on the next business day after being deposited in the United States mail in Seattle, or at the time they are actually hand -delivered to the addressee. B. Publicity. All news releases and public reports issued by County or the City describing any activity on the Project involving both parties should include a reference to the other party. Neither party will release any information about the Project to the news media or to the public without the prior written consent of the other party. 13. Any disputes arising out of this agreement shall be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provision set forth in Section 8 of the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Renton and Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle. 14. AMENDMENT, WAIVER This Agreement shall not be amended except in writing, executed by both Metro and the City. The provisions of this Agreement cannot be waived except by written agreement of the party against whom a waiver may be asserted. 15. Section titles or other headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be part of this Agreement, nor be considered in its interpretation. 16. BINDING UPON S ESSORS This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon the successors and assigns of both Metro and the City. 17. COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 18. NON -WAIVER By executing this Agreement, neither party shall be deemed to have waived, released or contracted away any powers, obligations or responsibilities granted or imposed by law. Metro and the City do not intend the terms of this Agreement to apply to any Metro facilities other than the Project. I:Z 11 la as-y7 CITY OF RENTON t PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKSW2_ 6P 1 #/lY/Zy%t. MEMORANDUM DATE: December 22, 1997 TO: Larry Warren VIA: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: Dave Christensen SUBJECT: Marianne Hirschfeld Lawsuit We have received a copy of the complaint for damages filed by Marianne Hirschfeld against the City, Frank Coluccio Construction and King County Metro. This action occurred during the time that King County Metro was contracting with Frank Coluccio Construction for the replacement of Metro's 42-inch sewer interceptor, and jointly with the City, the reconstruction of North Third Street. The City and Metro entered into an agreement for the above -mentioned work and a copy is included for your reference. The complaint filed by Ms. Hirschfeld was the result of work performed by Frank Coluccio Construction for Metro on a portion of the City's system. To the best of our knowledge, City staff was not present to witness the incident. Metro was responsible for the inspection of the project. The City was only responsible for oversight and final acceptance. I have asked Rick Kokko (City's Inspector) to check his diaries to determine if he has any further information regarding this incident. The only contact that we recall regarding this incident was when a claim was filed against the City, we were contacted by Risk Management, and we informed them that the contractor was under contract with Metro, not the City. City staff involved with this project were Dave Christensen and John Hobson from Wastewater, Rod Schindler from Transportation, and Rick Kokko from Public Works Inspection. Please let us know if there is any additional information that you need. H:DOCS:97-1 163:DMC:ps CC: Ron Olsen DATE: TO: VIA: FROM: STAFF CONTACT SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM August 3, 1995 Timothy J. Schlitzer, President Members of the Renton City Council Earl Clymer, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator John Hobson (X-6179) CONCURRENCE DATE J15- NAM \UDATE METRO'S CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT - Log #95055-C; Construction Noise, Speeding Marjorie Richter, of 300 Meadow Avenue North, has informed the City of problems relating to Metro's contractor, Collucio Construction, beginning work before the prescribed working hours, construction vehicles exceeding the speed limit and wrongful use of side streets. City staff has informed Metro's project inspector of the infractions and he has required the contractor to take corrective measures to adhere to the approved working hours and approved construction routes. Additionally, the City's inspector, who lives in the neighborhood, has also been monitoring the contractor's actions. Construction of the sewer portion of the project is estimated to be completed during the week of August 7. Following the completion of the sewer work, the road work will begin. The reconstruction of the road will be accomplished by Gary Merlino Construction, who is one of the subcontractors for Collucio Construction. H:DOCS:95-677:JDH:ps CC: Jay Covington City Clerk Ron Olsen Dave Christensen John Hobson CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: November 4, 1992 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Members of City Council VIA: Mayor Earl Clymer FROM: L�n ttmann STAFF CONTACT: David M. Christensen SUBJECT: METRO CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION STATUS REPORT (REF: 84-92) ISSUE: Due to the proximity of Metro's existing 42" Cedar River trunkline to the City's primary production wells (less than 50 feet), the City of Renton negotiated an agreement with Metro as part of the Memorandum of Agreement for the treatment plant expansion to relocate the existing trunkline. The location of the new trunkline is to be placed such that an adequate level of protection is provided to the City's water supply by constructing the relocated interceptor with ductile iron pipe and providing such separation from the actual well locations so that in the case of pipe leakage, monitoring wells will detect the leakage and provide adequate response time to remove contaminates prior to reaching the production wells. BACKGROUND: The City of Renton entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with Metro to relocate a portion of its 42" Cedar River trunkline to provide a much greater level of protection to the City's production wells located both in the Cedar River Park and Liberty Park. This agreement was executed by the City and Metro in June of 1991. Metro, as a result of timing constraints placed by the Washington State Transportation Department for its 1-405 relocation project, attempted to expedite the Cedar River Trunkline Relocation. The results of the initial evaluation performed by Metro and reviewed by the City indicated that from an engineering standpoint, the utilization of North 2nd Street would address the concerns of aquifer protection as well as the Kathy Keolker-Wheeler/Members of City Council Metro Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Status Report Page 2 constraints of timing and budget for Metro. During the public involvement process, including a public meeting held in August of 1991, there was a significant number of citizens from the North Renton neighborhood who opposed the North 2nd Street route alternative. Because of significant public opposition and time constraints placed by WSDOT, Metro elected to proceed with an interim relocation of the trunkline to meet only WSDOT's specific needs with the intent to proceed with the planning process on the complete relocation upon completion of the interim improvements. The construction of the interim improvements began in March, 1992 and were completed in June of 1992. With completion of the interim improvements that allowed WSDOT to proceed with its 1-405 relocation project, Metro and the City have been working together to ensure that the relocation project not only meets the needs of protection of the City's water supply but that it provides additional community benefit and limits neighborhood disruption. DISCUSSION: The City and Metro have evaluated multiple criterion when determining the best overall route for the trunkline. The items evaluated included: • Aquifer protection • Construction impacts • Overall costs • Transportation benefit • Utility conflicts • Effects on City collection system • Community enhancements The primary issues evaluated as part of aquifer protection included distance from primary wells, ability to intercept potential spills, and the ability to monitor potential spills. The attached memorandum dated April 4, 1992 from the Water Utility provides a basic analysis of the alternatives with respect to aquifer protection. Construction impacts were analyzed from both the contractor's as well as the neighborhood's perspective. Items analyzed include impacts to the neighborhood in regards to compaction/vibration related construction activities, neighborhood disruption, and traffic impacts. Various construction methods are being considered to greatly diminish the impacts of typical compaction/vibration related activities, including: • Utilization of non -compaction type backfill techniques including high density fill and water settling; • Utilization of low -vibration equipment in installation of steel sheeting in lieu of high impact driving methods typically used; • Elimination of vibratory rollers for compaction of roadway sections; and Kathy Keolker-Wheeler/Members of City Council Metro Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Status Report Page 3 • Other items including limiting the trenching area, and sawcutting of the existing pavement. To ensure that vibration levels do not exceed acceptable standards, both the City and Metro will utilize a firm specializing in this field to monitor construction activities. In addition, the City and Metro will have a "foundation crack survey" performed prior to beginning construction that will assist in determining if damage occurs as a result of construction. Overall costs are being analyzed in regards to impact to City and Metro programs, specifically to where cost savings can occur as a result of combining certain aspects of City and Metro projects slated for the area. Cost savings are being identified both from a construction standpoint as well as from a long-term maintenance standpoint. Potential transportation benefits apply primarily to the North 3rd Street alternative due to the ability to perform at least a portion of the improvements identified in Transportation's Capital Improvement Program as part of the trunkline relocation. Other alternatives do offer some minor transportation benefits. Each route was analyzed in respect to existing underground utility conflicts. The analysis evaluated multiple criterion in regards to utility conflicts. These items include: • Establishing a "corridor" in which the trunkline could be located; • Identifying facilities that would have to be re -adjusted to facilitate the location for the new trunkline; and • Identifying and quantifying potential temporary loss of service of some utilities as a result of the trunkline construction. Such items as temporary loss of coordinated signalization, sanitary and water service as well as other items were considered. A key element in the evaluation of the trunkline is the potential benefit derived for the City's local wastewater collection system. Each alternative has been evaluated for its ability to improve the flow characteristics of the local collection system as well as the alternatives ability to assist in the elimination of the City's interceptors that are currently located in the North Renton area. The benefit differs greatly depending on which alternative is selected, from providing no benefit, to providing essential elements to meet the long term needs of updating sanitary sewer service in the North Renton area. Community enhancements were evaluated along each alternative and included such items as planting of median strips, additional improvements that were included in the North Renton street improvement program, and other miscellaneous items that would provide additional enhancement. In addition, we evaluated each alternatives potential negative impact on existing improvements installed, such as previously improved portions of City roadway (i.e. North 1st Street). In addition to the pre -design report being prepared, the City and Metro have established an extensive public involvement program. This program has included Kathy Keolker-Wheeler/Members of City Council Metro Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Status Report Page 4 preliminary meetings with the active members of the North Renton neighborhood as well as a general public meeting which was held on September 29, 1992 at the Renton Senior Center. The residents provided additional insight to the project that is being incorporated into the pre -design report. Because the general consensus reached at the meeting indicated that the North 3rd Street alignment was preferred and because not all those who reside along the North 3rd Street alignment were in attendance, Metro submitted a letter to each individual business and residence along this alignment that included a summary of the September 29th meeting and asked that if they have any comments or concerns to contact either the City or Metro by mail or telephone. This letter was sent on October 5, 1992 and as of the writing of this report, neither the City nor Metro has received any additional response. Attached you will find a copy of the handout given at the September 29th meeting, summary of that presentation, letter sent to the North 3rd Street alignment residents and a memorandum from the Water Utility discussing the aquifer protection aspects of this project. At this time, Metro is finalizing the pre -design report and coordinating with the City its SEPA effort (Metro is Lead Agency). It is the intention of both the City and Metro that the North 3rd alignment be evaluated as the "preferred alternative" for environmental review through SEPA. Upon finalization of the pre -design report, copies will be submitted to Council for your information. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of staff, at this time, that the course of action shown in the discussion of this report proceed as indicated and that staff provide status reports periodically during key elements of this project. C:D0CS:92-898:D1V1C:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman Attachments CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 26, 1995 TO: Timothy J. Schlitzer, President Members of the Rent City Council VIA: Earl Clymer, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: John Hobson (X-6179) SUBJECT: METRO'S CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT - Log #95050-C; The Use of Mechanical Compacting Equipment The City Council has raised the question of: "should the Metro project be barred from using mechanical compaction devices since they promised that they would use an alternative procedure of compaction in order to protect the area's older homes"? A review of the City's project file for this project revealed several documents that detailed the concern about construction related vibration. All of these documents stated that vibration would be minimized by "limiting the use of compaction or hammering type of equipment, saw cutting the pavement for the pipe trench and using imported fill material". Metro's environmental checklist stated that using imported fill and a controlled density fill material in the pipe trench would be used to minimize the need for compaction. The construction plans for the project indicate that control density fill (CDF) is used in the pipe zone for bedding material. The remainder of the trench is to be backfilled with imported materials and/or native materials if they are found suitable. The compaction of materials other than CDF do require mechanical compacting equipment. There is nothing in the City's files stating that Metro committed to using CDF throughout their pipe trench. As part of the project, Metro has done a foundation survey of the existing structures in the area of the pipe alignment to determine their condition prior to construction. The City will be replacing most of the sanitary sewers between North 4th Street, North 1st Street, Burnett Avenue North and Houser Avenue North this year. Most of these sewers are located in the neighborhood alleys. Since the City's alley sewer replacement project is much closer to the existing structures in the neighborhood, we will use control density fill for trench backfill up to the road bed. This will eliminate the need for using mechanical compaction devices in the main line trenches. The new road bed will be compacted with non -vibratory rollers. H:DOCS:95-650:JDH:ps CC: Jay Covington City Clerk Ron Olsen Dave Christensen John Hobson t COUNCIL REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION FILE Copy 1 U: L7reg L1111111er111Q11 J U L 141995 FROM: Marilyn Petersen LOG #: 95050-C CITY OF RENTON On 7/10/95, Council referred the followingpUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. Discuss use of mechanical tamping equipment on N. 3rd sewer project with Metro. Please respond by: XX Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and return copy to you.) Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor and include attached letter(s) with memo. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and return copy to you.) Prepare memo to citizen/agency (signed by you or your staff) and submit to Mayor for approval. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and return to you for mailing. Include copy of attached letter with memo for Council info.) Schedule matter on Council committee agenda. XX When job is completed, return referral slip to City Clerk with all memoranda attached. PLEASE REFERENCE LOG NUMBER ON ALL LETTERS. Other Please complete request by 7/28/95. Thank you. Request completed on Staff time to prepare response /('e212 n 7 -/ 7 - 9 5— Comments Signature Date D7A11114 TO: VIA: FROM: STAFF CONTACT SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM July 26, 1995 Timothy J. Schlitzer, President Members of the Renton City Council Earl Clymer, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator John Hobson (X-6179) METRO'S CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION PROJECT - Log #95050-C; The Use of Mechanical Compacting Equipment The City Council has raised the question of: "should the Metro project be barred from using mechanical compaction devices since they promised that they would use an alternative procedure of compaction in order to protect the area's older homes"? A review of the City's project file for this project revealed several documents that detailed the concern about construction related vibration. All of these documents stated that vibration would be minimized by "limiting the use of compaction or hammering type of equipment, saw cutting the pavement for the pipe trench and using imported fill material". Metro's environmental checklist stated that using imported fill and a controlled density fill material in the pipe trench would be used to minimize the need for compaction. The construction plans for the project indicate that control density fill (CDF) is used in the pipe zone for bedding material. The remainder of the trench is to be backfilled with imported materials and/or native materials if they are found suitable. The compaction of materials other than CDF do require mechanical compacting equipment. There is nothing in the City's files stating that Metro committed to using CDF throughout their pipe trench. As part of the project, Metro has done a foundation survey of the existing structures in the area of the pipe alignment to determine their condition prior to construction. The City will be replacing most of the sanitary sewers between North 4th Street, North 1 st Street, Burnett Avenue North and Houser Avenue North this year. Most of these sewers are located in the neighborhood alleys. Since the City's alley sewer replacement project is much closer to the existing structures in the neighborhood, we will use control density fill for trench backfill up to the road bed. This will eliminate the need for using mechanical compaction devices in the main line trenches. The new road bed will be compacted with non -vibratory rollers. H:DOCS:95-650:JDH:ps CC: Jay Covington City Clerk Ron Olsen Dave Christensen John Hobson RENTON CITY COUNCIL July 10, 1995 City Clerk's Office Referrals ADMINISTRATION Letter from H.C. Gerber Jr., 2717 NE 23rd St., Renton, regarding illegal street blockage on NE 23rd St. Installation of traffic improvements at NE 9th St. and Harrington Ave. NE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE Library Board appointment Revisions to Renton Communities/Cities in Schools program agreement PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Complaints from residents of Eagle Ridge Condominiums re: Castle Rock Restaurant and Lounge Adoption of 1994 Uniform Codes (Building/Housing/Mechanical) PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Adoption of 1994 Uniform Fire Code TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE Lease extension for LAG-75-077, Cedar River Hangar Agreement with WSDOT for I-405 Multi -Modal Corridor Study ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING Adoption of WSDOT/APWA 1994 construction specifications & standards (1st reading 7/10/95) PUBLIC HEARING 7/17/95 — Setback and Landscaping Changes in Commercial and Industrial Zones PUBLIC MEETING 7/24/95 — AnMarCo 10% Notice of Intent to Annex Petition (68th Ave SBeacon Coal Mine Rd) July 10, 1995 Monday, 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL OF COUNCILMEMBERS RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Municipal Building Council Chambers MINUTES Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. TIMOTHY SCHLITZER, Council President; TONI NELSON; JESSE TANNER; KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER; BOB EDWARDS. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS RICHARD STREDICKE AND RANDY CORMAN. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Executive Assistant to the ATTENDANCE Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; MICHAEL KATTERMANN, Planning & Technical Services Director; JIM HANSON, Development Services Director; JANA HUERTER, Land Use Review Supervisor; NEIL WATTS, Plan Review Supervisor; ABDOUL GAFOUR, Civil Engineer; COMMANDER ROB SOFIE, Police Department. APPROVAL OF MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL MINUTES COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 26, 1995, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published Planning: Minimum & in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Clymer opened the public Maximum Densities in hearing to consider amendments to minimum and maximum density Residential Zones requirements (number of homes per acre) allowed in residential zones. Michael Kattermann, Planning & Technical Services Director, explained that the proposed changes will make the Zoning Code consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies on minimum density, and will also provide greater flexibility to meet minimum density requirements in residential zones. One proposal is to exempt existing parcels less than or equal to one-half acre in size from the minimum density requirement in all residential zones. The minimum density requirement in the Resource Conservation (RC) zone and the R-1 zone would be eliminated. Another change would reduce the minimum density in the R-8 zone from 5.6 to 5.0 units per acre. Additionally, density requirements in some zones could be waived for factors such as phasing, land reserves and lot configuration, among others. The maximum density in the R-8 zone would increase from 8.0 to 9.7 units per acre on infill lots less than or equal to one-half acre. Responding to Councilman Tanner, Mr. Kattermann said R-8 lots larger than one-half acre would not be exempt from the 8.0 unit maximum density. In response to Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler, Mr. Kattermann said under current density requirements, a lot of one-half acre could have no more than three units. The new 9.7 per acre density would allow up to four units, depending on site -specific conditions. Mr. Kattermann concluded that the Planning Commission recommended a review be conducted of the minimum density policies within five years. July 10, 1995 Renton Citv Council Minutes Page 274 Audience comment was invited. Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, 98057, said the increase in maximum density for the R-8 zone from 8.0 to 9.7 units per acre should not apply to infill lots, which would impact already established neighborhoods, but instead should apply only to new development. She suggested that if one-half acre lots are to be restricted to four units or less, this specification be clearly put forth in the ordinance language. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (Mr. Kattermann noted that this subject matter will remain in Planning & Development Committee for development of the ordinance.) Building: Temporary Use This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published Permit Ordinance in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Clymer opened the public hearing to consider revisions to Renton City Code Section 4-31-19.E regarding temporary use permits, and to Section 5-1-LA revising the temporary use permit application fee. Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, explained that temporary use permits are meant for uses that are short-term in nature. Staff has proposed that these permits be reviewed and decided administratively rather than go before the Hearing Examiner for a public hearing and subsequent approval or disapproval. This change is proposed to streamline the process and the timing of permit approval. Responding to Councilman Tanner, Ms. Huerter said the process would allow for administrative permit extensions of up to one year for temporary sales or rental offices in subdivisions, multi -family or non-residential projects, or other longer -term uses. Audience comment was invited. Bob Sterbank, 1325 Fourth Ave., Suite 1500, Seattle, 98101, requested that Council postpone first reading of the temporary use permit ordinance until all Councilmembers are present. He explained several concerns regarding the proposed changes, primarily that they might provide a special permit procedure that would be used by Bryant Motors. If this is not Council's intent, he asked that it amend paragraph E on page 2 of the ordinance to restrict temporary parking lots and areas to only those temporary uses identified in previous sections A through D. He further suggested adding a paragraph that would exclude authorization of the expansion of existing nonconforming uses. Continuing, Mr. Sterbank urged Council to consider the potential impacts on residential areas if temporary use permits are authorized for 180 days and later extended for one year. He was concerned that although the ordinance language allows provision of notice to interested parties, it does not require this be given. Noting that the ordinance would permit modification of development standards, he questioned which standards could be modified and to what extent. He said the impacts of waiving application requirements cannot yet be known, emphasizing that in any case, SEPA compliance requirements must not be waived. Mr. Sterbank concluded that although temporary uses such as Christmas tree lot sales would be appropriate for administrative approval, other more long-term uses (e.g., occupancy of temporary structures) should continue to go before the Hearing Examiner. July 10, 1995 Renton Citv Council Minutes Page 275 Versie Vaupel, PO Box 755, Renton, 98057, said the public should not have to absorb the cost of staff time relating to permits for non-profit groups and organizations, especially those that are religious in nature. She felt that the proposed public notification to only adjacent property owners was too limited and should be expanded to within 300 feet of the proposed use. She concurred with Mr. Sterbank's suggestion that the ordinance distinguish between smaller -scale temporary uses and larger ones, with the fee reduction from $1,000 to $100 not applying to the larger uses. Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Ave. S., Renton, 98055, noted his agreement with the July 6, 1995 letter to Council from Mr. Sterbank regarding SEPA threshold and environmental determinations. Saying that the City's concurrent scheduling of appeal and comment periods for environmental decisions negates the purpose of the SEPA process, Mr. Webb found the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) recent correspondence to Council on this issue troubling. He reiterated his earlier suggestion that the City allow for one appeal after the final wording of an ordinance is available rather than when it is still in draft form. Further, several related or similar ordinances could be packaged together with only one appeal fee required. King Parker, 4601 NE 24th St., Renton, 98056, urged Council to consider the needs and interests of the entire community. He supported the proposed temporary use permitting process and said it would enhance flexibility and streamline the process while making it more sensitive to the needs of residents and businesses. Denny Dochnahl, 2006 Redmond Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, agreed that the temporary use permit process should be streamlined as it seemed to him that many temporary uses do not get permits. He felt that the changes would help in situations where the normal zoning would not allow a certain desired use. Carl Magnuson, 3400 E. Valley Rd., Renton, 98057, owner of South End Auto Wrecking, said the proposed changes to the temporary use permit process were positive and made good business sense. Wayne Jones, PO Box 146, Renton, 98055, said King County has an ordinance for temporary uses similar to that being discussed this evening. Noting, for example, that municipal jobs awarded via a formal bidding process often must begin work within 30 days, he supported the proposed changes as a way to secure quick permit approval. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Councilman Tanner indicated he would support a temporary use permit ordinance for genuine temporary uses if the legislation were so written that it could not be subverted and applied to other than temporary uses. Responding to Councilman Edwards, Ms. Huerter said the proposed ordinance allows for an appeal to be filed with the Hearing Examiner within ten days of permit approval or disapproval. Noting it might not be apparent that a permit has been granted in the initial ten-day period, Mr. Edwards asked if an aggrieved party would have any recourse after ten days. Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney, said language could be added to the ordinance that would allow the City to revoke a permit for cause (for example, should it prove to be a nuisance). July 10, 1995 Renton City Council Minutes Page 276 MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL POSTPONE FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE UNTIL 7/17/95 TO ALLOW FOR INCLUSION OF LANGUAGE REGARDING REVOCATION OF A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FOR CAUSE. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Charles Doyle, 501 S. 5th St., Renton, 98055, declared a potential for Citizen Comment: Doyle - accidents at the Shattuck St. tunnel location, where two-way traffic is Shattuck St Tunnel restricted to a one -lane tunnel. Saying he has witnessed several driver altercations at this location, Mr. Doyle urged Council to address this issue by either widening the tunnel to two lanes or by posting signs encouraging caution and courtesy. Citizen Comment: Webb - Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Ave. S., Renton, 98055, clarified that no one voicing Various Issues concerns earlier this evening regarding the proposed changes to the temporary use permit process opposes such permits. On another subject, Mr. Webb commented on the City's declaration of budget woes and the need for long- term service cuts, noting it plans to spend $11,000 to survey residents on which cuts should be made. He felt that this survey should have preceded various City expenditures relating to the golf course, the recent downtown property purchase and other programs. Mr. Webb also said people should be free to distribute literature that is deemed to be in the public interest in the City's parks, and further suggested that the City hold a candidates forum at the Senior Center for the benefit of non -incumbent candidates who are prohibited from campaigning on the premises of the Senior Center and Houser Terrace. Citizen Comment: Jim Moncrief, 248 Garden Ave. N., Renton, 98055, said as he had predicted, Moncrief - City Finances the City's expenditures are growing faster than its revenues. He urged Council to determine what projects can be put on hold, saying some may be unnecessary, and cautioned against having to raise utility rates for Renton residents in the event of a water shortage, given that the City has agreed to sell water to other jurisdictions in emergency situations. Mr. Moncrief concluded that local newspapers are failing in their duty to watchdog government operations. Citizen Comment: Bob Sterbank, 1325 Fourth Ave., Suite 1500, Seattle, 98101, reiterated that the Sterbank - Temporary Use City should adopt a temporary use permit ordinance that is clean and not Permit Ordinance vague, and that excludes parking for existing uses. He said the City could prevent some appeals of permits by eliminating potential problems in the drafting of the ordinance's language, and agreed with Mrs. Vaupel that adequate notification of temporary use permit applications should be given to properties within 300 feet of the proposed use. Regarding the process of ERC SEPA determination and Council consideration of proposed legislation, Mr. Sterbank suggested that the City direct comment and appeal periods to run separately. This would allow the ERC or Council to take public comment and perhaps modify the legislation in response prior to the commencement of the appeal period. r- Citizen Comment: Richter Marjorie Richter, 300 Meadow Ave. N., Renton, 98055, cited problems with - N 3rd St Sewer Project the construction of the N. 3rd St. sewer project, including that the contractor has repeatedly started work as early as 6:00 a.m. in violation of explicit City rules prohibiting construction noise until 7:00. Thanking various City staff members for their efforts to resolve these problems, Mrs. Richter suggested that residents in the area might be willing to authorize construction until 6:00 p.m. if they could be assured this would expedite completion of the project. �! Councilman Tanner asked the Administration to look into barring the use of mechanical tampers for grouting work, as Metro had promised it would use an alternate procedure for the protection of this area's older homes. ---•^.: .....<•,. _..:. -v._�,-'.::v.,._..r:..,l�wr,-_-:x-°_,'...�-. _s .:.tee. �-r=>.. >: Citizen Comment Parker King Parker, 4601 NE 24th St , t entott, 9 ;" Mng"tvlated - Citizen and Volunteer Long, who received Renton's 1995 Citizen of the Year award, and the 400- Recognition plus volunteers who donate their time to the City on a regular basis. Citizen Comment: LaKous Ed LaKous, 1529 S. Eagle Ridge Dr., Renton, 98055, described continuing - Castle Rock Restaurant problems with the Castle Rock Restaurant & Lounge located on Eagle Ridge & Lounge Dr., explaining that nearby residents are subjected to high levels of noise from the nightclub's patrons and their vehicles. Mr. LaKous said because Castle Rock is open until 4:00 a.m., residents are disturbed by sounds such as people laughing and shouting and car or portable radios, and these noises are audible even if residents close the windows and doors of their own homes. Citizen Comment: Minte - James Minte, 1633 S. Eagle Ridge Dr., Renton, 98055, concurred in Mr. Castle Rock Restaurant & LaKous's comments regarding the noise disturbances of the Castle Rock Lounge nightclub, saying that the sale of his home recently fell through because of the tremendous negative impact this business has had on its neighbors. Mr. Minte also voiced fire and safety concerns, given the club's crowded parking situation, and played a portion of an audio tape recorded in his home that was illustrative of the noise Eagle Ridge residents have been forced to endure. Mr. Minte concluded that although the Castle Rock property is zoned commercial, the Neighborhood Commercial zone in which it is located is clearly intended to serve the needs of the neighborhood adjacent to the commercial area. In reality, however, this business has substantial and undue effects on adjacent properties. Citizen Comment: Jessen - Lester Jessen, 1505 S. Eagle Ridge Dr., Renton, 98055, appealed to Castle Rock Restaurant & Councilmembers to personally visit the Eagle Ridge community and evaluate Lounge for themselves the impacts of the Castle Rock nightclub on nearby residents. Responding to Council inquiry, Executive Assistant Jay Covington briefly summarized a memo on this issue from Police Commander Brian Wilson. The memo cited the number and various types of complaints received regarding the nightclub as well as actions proposed by the business owner to mitigate impacts. Citizen Comment: Carol Reinhart, 1511 S. Eagle Ridge Dr., Renton, 98055, stated that the Reinhart - Castle Rock situation regarding the Castle Rock nightclub has not changed, in spite of the Restaurant & Lounge owner's contention that he has recently taken steps to alleviate the impact on neighboring residents. Saying that Eagle Ridge is a well -cared -for neighborhood, Ms. Reinhart felt that Castle Rock's current location was not appropriate for a business of this type. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Larson Ruthie Larson, 714 High Ave. S., Renton, 98055, questioned how often the - Sunset Blvd On -Ramp retention ponds on Renton Hill will be pumped as some residents are to I-405 concerned these could become breeding grounds for mosquitoes. On another subject, Mrs. Larson reported on an accident that occurred July 4th at the Sunset Blvd. on -ramp to I-405 as well as other recent accidents at this location. She suggested changing the location and height of the yield sign for drivers turning left from Sunset onto northbound 1-405 to make this sign more noticeable, which might help prevent future accidents. July 10, 1995 Renton City Council Minutes Page 278 CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Appointment: Library Mayor Clymer appointed L. Gene Craig, 3204 Park Ave. N., Renton, 98056, Board to the Library Board for a five-year term expiring 6/01/2001. Refer to Community Services Committee. H&HS: Cities in Schools Executive Department submitted a proposed amendment to the interlocal Program Amendment agreement between the City, the Renton School District and the Washington State Communities in Schools organization to fund the establishment of a local Renton Communities/Cities in Schools organization. Refer to Community Services Committee. Building: Adoption of Building Division submitted proposed revisions to City Code to reference the 1994 Uniform Codes 1994 editions of the Uniform Building Code, the Uniform Housing Code, the (Building/Housing/ Uniform Mechanical Code, and the Code for Abatement of Dangerous Mechanical) Buildings, along with certain related technical amendments to the Building and Mechanical Codes. Refer to Plannine & Development Committee. Fire: Adoption of 1994 Fire Prevention Bureau submitted proposed ordinance adopting the 1994 Uniform Code Uniform Fire Code. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Plat: Final, Honey Creek Hearing Examiner submitted Honey Creek Ridge Division I Final Plat, 34 lots Ridge, SE 96th PI/SE on 14.5 acres located between SE 96th Pl., SE 104th St., Honey Creek and 104th St 126th Ave. SE (File No. FP-95-068), and recommended approval with conditions. Council concur. (See page 280 for resolution.) Annexation: AnMarCo, Planning and Technical Services Division requested a public meeting be 68th Ave S/Beacon Coal scheduled for 7/24/95 to consider acceptance of the 10% Notice of Intent to Mine Road Annex for the proposed AnMarCo annexation area, approximately 2.9 acres located at 68th Ave. S. and Beacon Coal Mine Road. Council concur. Lease: Cedar River Transportation Division submitted a proposed extension of the lease with Hangar, LAG-75-077 Cedar River Hangar General Partnership, LAG-75-077, for a period of ten (Extension) years to expire 8/31/2005. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Transportation: I-405 Transportation Division submitted proposed interlocal agreement with WSDOT Multi -Modal Corridor agreeing to contribute $5,350 toward completion of the I-405 Multi -Modal Study, WSDOT Corridor study. Refer to Transportation Committee. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from H.C. Gerber Jr., 2717 NE 23rd St., Renton, Citizen Comment: Gerber 98056, regarding the lack of improvement of NE 23rd St. east of Edmonds, - Illegal Street Blockage which has resulted in illegal street blockage and unauthorized dangerous street on NE 23rd marking. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR INVESTIGATION AND A REPORT BACK. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a report recommending Finance Committee approval of Claims Vouchers #125250 - 125659; two wire transfers in the Finance: Vouchers total amount of $2,525,888.13; approval of Payroll Vouchers #135941 - 136337; and 410 direct deposits in the total amount of $1,130,426.90. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. July 10, 1995 Renton Citv Council Minutes Page 279 Plannine & Development Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented Committee a report recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt the Planning: Adoption of 1994 Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)/American WSDOT 1994 Construction Public Works Assocation (APWA) amendments to the City of Renton Standard Specifications & Standards Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 280 for ordinance.) _Community Services Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff and Park Board recommendation to Parks: Maplewood Golf negotiate a formal lease agreement and food concession contract between As Course Concessionaire, As the Tables Turn and the City of Renton for the Maplewood Golf Course the Tables Turn lounge, restaurant and banquet facilities. The Committee further recommended that this matter remain in committee until final negotiations are complete. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Appointment: Municipal Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report Arts Commission recommending concurrence in the Mayor's appointments to the Municipal Arts Commission of Eleanor L. Simpson for a three-year term expiring 12/31 /97, and of Deborah Lea Hansen to fill the unexpired term of Diana Hitch (term to expire 12/31/95). MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Edwards presented a report Committee regarding transportation improvements at Harrington Ave. NE and NE 9th St. Transportation: NE 9th The Committee recommended that Council authorize the Administration to St/Harrington Ave NE immediately make the following traffic improvements at the referenced Traffic Improvements intersection: 1. Coordinate with the Fire Department to move the stop sign and stop bar on the north leg up to the intersection; 2. Add a marked crosswalk on the north leg across Harrington Ave. NE at NE 9th St.; 3. Install a four-way red flashing light at the intersection of Harrington Ave. NE and NE 9th St.; and 4. Contact the property owner on the southeast corner of Harrington Ave. NE and NE 9th St. to cut back the tree and shrubs on the corner. The Committee further recommended that Council authorize the Administration to analyze the walkways in the area of NE 9th St. and Harrington Ave. NE for needed improvements and review the Walkway Program as a possible means of funding such improvements. Also, authorize the Administration to coordinate with the School District to determine if any additional school crossings are needed in the vicinity of Highlands Elementary School. The Administration will report back to the Committee with recommendations that result from the above action. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS July 10, 1995 Renton City Council Minutes Pape 280 Resolution #3136 A resolution was read approving the final plat for Honey Creek Ridge, Plat: Final, Honey Creek Division 1, File No. FP-95-068 (property located east of Honey Creek, south Ridge, SE 96th Pl/SE of SE 96th St., north of SE 104th St. and west of 126th Ave. SE). MOVED 104th St BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 07/17/95 for second reading: Planning: Adoption of An ordinance was read adopting the 1994 standard specifications for road, WSDOT 1994 Construction bridge and municipal construction (WSDOT and APWA) by reference. Specifications & Standards MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 07 17 95. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading: Ordinance #4539 An ordinance was read providing for 1995 budget amendments in the total Transportation: Six -Year amount of $47,350 for transportation improvement projects; the total amended Improvement Plan (TIP) TIP budget for 1996-2001 is $16,270,267. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4540 An ordinance was read amending Ordinance No. 4434, expanding the LID: 337, Dayton Ave NE boundaries of Local Improvement District #337 (Dayton Avenue NE), addins, Sanitary Sewers parcel #20. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4541 An ordinance was read approving and confirming the assessments and LID: 337, Dayton Ave NE assessment roll of Local Improvement District #337 for the improvement of a Sanitary Sewers certain area in Dayton Avenue NE (NE 20th St. to NE 22nd St.) and in NE 22nd St. (Edmonds to Dayton Aves.) by doing all work necessary in connection therewith, levying and assessing the amounts therefor against the several lots, tracts, parcels of land and other property as shown on said assessment roll as confirmed by the City Council; and providing for the payment of such assessments into the Local Improvement Fund, District #337, of the City of Renton, as created by Ordinance No. 4434; the total amount of the LID is $124,293.54. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:44 p.m. MARILYN-J. 6iERSEN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Brenda Fritsvold 7/10/95 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 10, 1995 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 7/17 Update on Mount Olivet Situation (Schlitzer) 6:30 p.m. COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE (Keolker-Wheeler) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Stredicke) PUBLIC SAFETY (Tanner) TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) (Edwards) UTILITIES (Corman) TUES., 7/11 Library Board Appointment; 3:30 p.m. Renton Community in Schools Interlocal *5th Floor* Agreement WED., 7/12 Adoption of 1994 Uniform Building 3:30 p.m. Codes; *5th Floor* Class "A" Non -Conforming Uses WED., 7/12 Uniform Fire Code Adoption 3:00 p.m. TUES., 7/11 Trench Restoration and Street Overlay 4:30 p.m. Standards *5th Floor* OTHER MEETINGS Sister City Committee TUES., 7/11 4:15 p.m., 1st Floor Conference Room NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the 6th floor conference room unless otherwise noted. CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT September, 1992 Last year the City of Renton and Metro made plans to relocate the 42-inch Cedar River Trunk sewer line to better protect the city's sole source aquifer. Before the planning process was completed, construction on Interstate 405 made it necessary to move a small part of the pipeline. The planning process continues and now includes six alternatives. After public discussion of the proposed alternatives, planners and engineers from the City of Renton and Metro will identify the best location for the pipeline. The project schedule will then be identified and more public meetings will be held. This public information document describes the proposed alternatives for relocating the sewer line. It answers some questions that have been asked about the project at previous public meetings. If you would like to comment on the route alternatives, please call or send your comments to one of the following people: Dave Christensen phone: 277-6212 City of Renton Wastewater Utility Division 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Ron Post phone: 684-1143 Metro Water Pollution Control Department 821 Second Ave. Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Q. Why does the sewer line need to be relocated? A. To gain needed protection for the city's sole source aquifer. Metro and Renton staff have identified six alternatives. Q. Which alternatives are being considered? A. The six alternatives (Figure 1) can be described as follows: A. building a new pipe -within -a -pipe along the existing route through Cedar River Park and Liberty Park and proceeding along North First Street; B. moving the pipeline under Bronson Way then connecting to the existing pipe; C. moving the pipeline under Second Avenue then connecting to the existing pipe. D. moving the pipeline under Third Avenue then connecting to the Metro Eastside interceptor along Burnett Avenue North; E. moving the pipeline under Fourth Avenue then connecting to with the Eastside interceptor along Burnett Avenue North; F. moving the pipeline under Fifth Avenue then connecting to the Eastside interceptor along Burnett Avenue North; Q. Are the alternatives different from the ones selected for public presentation last year? A. Routes B and C were proposed last year. Routes A, D, E, and F are new alternatives. The new alternatives and criteria used to evaluate them are the result of cooperation bewteen the City of Renton and Metro. Staff engineers have worked together to determine routes that would best serve the planning efforts of both agencies. Q. What are the benefits of planning and accomplishing those projects jointly? A. North Renton's aging sewer lines and traffic distribution patterns require solutions within the next few years. If Metro and the City of Renton build their projects concurrently, there will be less disruption to the neighborhood and fewer costs associated with all of the projects. Q. What if the project isn't done? Will the aquifer be harmed in any way? A. The relocated pipeline will provide more protection for the aquifer because most of the alternative routes relocate the sewer line farther away from wells 1, 2, and 3, Renton's primary production wells. Choosing one of the alternatives would allow for a greater degree of" protection should any break occur in the line. If a leak occurs, city wells 8 and 9, which lie between the alternative routes and city wells 1, 2, and 3, could be used to monitor and pump water before any contaminant could reach the primary wells. Q. Will the construction of a new pipeline through the north Renton neighborhood cause damage to structures? A. With newer methods of construction, engineers can excavate and backfill without causing damage to nearby properties. Q. What is the desired project schedule? A. There are two possibilities for completing the project. One schedule would allow the project to begin in late 1993 or early in 1994, after public involvement and the selection of the best alternative. Part of the new trunk line, east of Interstate 405, would be deferred until 1996 or later until I-405 improvements are completed. The other alternative is to defer all work until at least 1996. Q. What are the pros and cons of each schedule? A. If the entire project begins in 1993, at least some of the city's planned sewer and street improvements could be incorporated into the construction schedule. If most of the project begins in 1996, then the street and utility improvements may be disrupted and the neighborhood would have construction twice within a 3-4 year period. Q. How long will the construction take? A. The pipeline relocation would take about four months to complete. In addition, the City of Renton's sewer improvements would take about six months to complete. Q. What are the criteria used to evaluate the various alternatives? A. The criteria are listed below. No order of importance is given. -- Aquifer protection - Construction impacts - Overall costs (city and Metro) -- Transportation benefit -- Utility right-of-way conflicts -- Effects on city's collection system -- Community enhancements A, &qo L i s T �� CIMV Update � MAR 61994 Cedar River Trunk relocation, Engineeee street CITY RENTON ring Dept. i ntprr►ovemien+ts to begim on i�� or 1l i Third The City of Renton and Metro will soon begin to construct a new pipeline and street improvements along North Third Street in Renton. The work is part of the joint Cedar River Trunk relocation project. As part of a memorandum of understanding between the City of Renton and Metro, Metro agreed to move a portion of its sewer interceptor, the Cedar River Trunk. The first phase of that work was accom- plished in 1992. Phase II construction will begin this summer along with the improvements on North Third Street by the City of Renton. Construction of Phase III, which will probably begin in 1995, requires crossing under Interstate 405. Environmental review issued Metro has completed its review of Phase H and III of this project, and it has issued a State Environ- mental Policy Act determination of non -significance. Tl:c 15 :ay SEP c=n n.- t periou cads NIa.ch 30, 1994. Copies of the project's determination of non - significance and environmental checklist may be reviewed at the Renton Public Library main branch, 100 Mill Ave.S., or at Metro, Environmental Planning and Real Estate Division, 12th floor, 821 Second Ave., Seattle. For more information or to comment on the DNS, please call Shirley Marroquin, supervising environmental planner at Metro, (206) 684-1173. The project's environmental review identified concerns such as traffic and the potential for vibration due to construction. While traffic will continue to use North Third during construction, some delays can be �: R1ETR0 King County Department of Metroplitan Services expected. Efforts to mitigate the impacts on traffic include but are not limited to: limiting hours of construction, limiting the width of the construction area and a traffic control plan to direct traffic flow. Vibration due to construction will be minimized by limiting the use of compaction or hammering equip- ment, saw -cutting the pipe trench and using imported fill material in the pipe trench to minimize the need for compaction. Location of pipeline, street improvements Metro's Phase H pipeline will be constructed in the middle of North Third between Burnett Avenue North and Factory Avenue North. Two alternatives exist for extending the pipeline from Factory to Sunset Boulevard. Option one is to route the new pipeline from the corner of Third and Factory south to Brooks and along Brooks to approximately the railroad track. Option two follows North Third to Sunset and south along Sunset about 300 feet. The City of Renton will relocate the existing curbs of North Third inward by about four feet on each side, narrowing the existing street width by a total of eight feet between Burnett Avenue North and Factory Avenue North. Future traffic flow improve- ments will affect both North Third and North Fourth streets and are part of Renton's Livable Streets pro- gram. Who to contact For information about the City of Renton's street improvements, please call Rod Schindler at 277-6219 or write to him at the City of Renton, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. S., Renton, WA 98055. Metro's community relations staff will notify residents and commuters prior to construction work and will be available during and after the construction period to resolve complaints. If you have questions about the pipeline relocation project, please call Ron Post at Metro, Water Pollution Control Department, King County Department of Metropolitan Services, 684-1143. You can also write to him at Metro, 821 Second Ave., M.S. 95, Seattle, WA 98104-1598. This document is available in accessible formats upon request at (206) 684-2046 (voice) or (206) 689-3413 (TDD). A l ' 206-639-3706 METRO WPCD COMM Po+h-Ir" Urarc Fax Transmittal Memo 7672 No otPage: Z To- From Company � � � � _ n � � � � Company Local= Locarion Fax # T;;epnone Fax # '1 Comments Original Desucy Disposizidn; 354 Pal FEE 17 '94 17:02 Tcday'sDatg Time (17� ,Dept. Charge Telephones 4 C ,; 1) T ElAe:urn 11 Can for cickup Meeting at Versie Vaupel's house, Monday Mar. 22, 1993 (Cedar River Trunk relocation project) Present: Mann Ling Thibert, Metro Ron Post, Metro Dave Christensen, City of Renton Rod Schindler, City of Renton Warren Vaupel Versie Vaupel Marjorie Richter Ray Wautlet Catherine Wautlet Ron stated that there seemed to be agreement among all parties that North Third Street would be pursued as the alternative of choice for the relocated trunk line. Since the public meeting last September, the community concerns (or Metro's and the City of Renton's) have not changed. This meeting may answer questions about those concerns, and its purpose is to bring community members up to date about the design phase of the project. Versie and Ray asked about the possibility of the route going down Factory near the intersection with Sunset. Dave and Rod pointed out that excavating the street for a project of this nature was nearly impossible in that location because of the utilities underneath the ground and the traffic impact in that area. Community members asked about the City's plans for traffic improvements on North Fourth. Could these planned improvements happen sooner? Rod said the money for the completion of North Fourth improvements is not there at this time. The only improvement associated with this project is the narrowing of North Third. That is a real benefit, however. It was unknown what the impacts of this narrowing on other streets would be. Community members asked under which side of North Third the pipeline would be placed. How would the costs be shared for curb expansion? Dave and Mann -Ling said the trunk line would probably go under the street where the fewest utilities exist. Indications are that the North side of Third mivht work hest. r)irhs would nrnhahly he expanded eoually from both sides of the street. Costs for the curb expansion would be shared equally -by the City's Liveable Streets program and Metro. Ray noted that when putting the trunk line under the lot at the end of Brooks Street, crews should be aware of the large cement pillars and foundation buried there. There is also a city water line under Brooks, and a storm sewer under Houser that runs through the lumber yard. Ron will keep the lumber yard management informed of plans. Mann Ling said the survey of North Third would begin soon. All work will be above ground_ The location of all utilities and other facilities will help the design process. The design will proceed for the route along North Third Street from Factory Ave.. to Burnett 206-609-5706 METRO WPCD COMM 554 P02 FEE 17 '94 17:0.E Ave.. The construction of the project is expected to proceed in phases, and North Third (but not necessarily Brooks) would be the first phase. Marjorie noted that accidents can take place if crews leave excavation holes open or the area is not properly marked during construction. She suggested flaggers as well as either fences or secure coverings at excavation sites. Dave explained the alley sewer project that would begin about the same time as Metro's project. The alley sewers are up to 70 years old. The alleys between Burnett and Sunset, from North Fourth to North First, will be replaced. A state grant will probably help pay for these improvements. The alleys will be resurfaced and new storm drains will be built. Rod said he received a call asking about underground cable tv lines on North Third. Those lines are in the air. Community members asked where the staging areas will be for construction equipment. That was not known. Dust, dirt and the location of portable toilets for the construction workers are real issues for the community. Ron ,kU let Metro's contractor know about the community's past experiences at the pre -construction meeting when it happens. Ron plans to mail information about this and other joint projects (with City of Renton) on new letterhead that shows the two governments in cooperation. SUMMARY of issues raised at meeting: The project will be phased. This phase of the project should occur in 1994, at the same time the City's alley sewer project gets under way. Survey work will concentrate on North Third. Community members gave valuable information that should be included in design considerations. Some form of foundation monitoring by Metro and the City of Renton will occur, so that engineers can monitor for potential damage. To ]limit impacts on traffic, Metro's contractor will work specified hours and will comply with the City of Renton's traffic plan for the project. The minutes of this meeting will be sent to all those attending and this information will be summarized in the next mailing to the community. -;2�Y&-/ rn r= Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • sai 5ecand Ave. • Seattie, WA 98i0a.i..59n FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVBR SIiEET DATE SENT: alZ ¢ �: TRANSMITTED TO: �/i1/I Ti t'f�QIST �N Scic1 TRMSMITTED FROM: G IN67' (Name) (Mail stop) �219 4 - 46-; (Phcre} FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: (Z06) 684-1710 trio. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: (Includirq Cover Sheet).& - FOR INTERNAL_STAFF USE ONLY: PROJECT: ARMS/TASK NO.: SLTPZF,.CT: //�%� �9 JOCK' C% S 6— NOTES: E/T'd OTZTV89902 S39IA83S '8DW3 0Hi3W 9S:2T b6, bZ 933 ot► .� CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lyon Guttmann, Administrator October 22, 1002 ` uL� a CT 2 6 Mr. William Nitz Capital Projects Supervisor b #r0*Q '4df RtAl'd Municipality of Metropolitan Sesttle 821 Second Ave. M.S.130 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 SUBJECT. METRO-R£NTON MOA AGREEMENT, SECTION 4.2, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS Cesr Mr. Nitz: Dunng recant days we have been discussing elements of the Memorandum of Agreement betweiAn Metro and the City of Renton. Two questions reiating to compensation came up in particular. The first question involves Metro funding for Community Improvements, as covered under Section 4.2 or the MCA_ This section states that a $1.000,r.00 disbursement from Metro to the City of Renton was to be made on Jurc 1, 1032. As you have noted, this disbursement ras not yet been mace. We are asking that Metro hake this disbursement forthwith. We are also asking that interest be paid for the period of time whicrt has elapsed since the agreed upon disbursal date (June 1. 1992). We are enclosing interest rates for these months from the State of Washington Local Government Investment Pool. Your second question involves whether Metro should be reimbursing the City of Renton for City staff time dedicated to the Systems Imprvvemerlls projects identified in Section 5 of the MOA. These projects include the Cedar River Trunk, the Maple Valley interceptor Phase 1, and the Cascade Siphon/ Footbridge. Our understanding of the intent of the MOA is that Metro should not be required to reimburse the City for City staff time spent on these projects beyond the requirement to pay all submittal. permitting, and licensing fees associated with those projects, as mandated by City Code. I hope this answers the questions you have raised in regard to this issue. Very truly yours., Lynn uttmann, .administrator H:MOA-A. :GZ ARBCMM MI ee; Jay Covington Larry Warren Dan Clements Wen Wang Cary Gatti Cmgg zMmemnrl Cavo Chr ..tansan Pnsedia Pleree 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washington 98055 C12'd OTZTV89902 S33IA63S *65W3 0613W 9S:2T V6, V2 E33 ��mETRO King Canty ! Deparenent of Metmpolttan Services lixchattge Building • KI Second Avenue • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684 - 2100 1�ebruary 22, 1994 90829 E13 John Hobson Utility Sysietus Division Planning 1Buildwg/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue.Soulh Renton, Washington 98055 Cedar River Trunk Relocation Project, Phase M Cmstrucrirm Easement ARMS No. A6502Z Task No. E13 Derr John: Metro is currently in the process of relocating its 42-inch diameter Cedar River Trunk sewage line in order to meet our corninitrnent to the City of Renton as specified at our Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). The City of Renton chose a new pipe alignment along the North Third Street to corincide, with the City's North Third Strait Improvement project and to comply with its own 'Livable Streets" program. The current align=t and construction plans require that Metro obtain a permanent utility and temporary construction easement. on Ilae property Icy[ ownrd by Mr. C`..W. Pharr and Mrs. JoAnn Pharr and located at 255 Sunset Blvd. North. Metro's right-of-way group is currently worlang on d L. acquisition. If we- am unable to secure the proper casements, Metro has received written asstuancc from the City's wastewater utility group that rerouting the pipeline along Sunset is an acceptable aItemadve_ If you have any questions, please contact me at 68"785 or David Christensrn at 277- 6212. Sincerely, Mann -Ling Tht}�rt Project Ma>13fter MLT:sclmsF�h c�, cc: Roger Browne - 117 Marc Dallas - 122 c/S'd OT2Tb09902 S=,-`-,2'3S '2J9N3 Oai3W 2.S:2T b6, bZ 33d WUA6u W W W W W W xxx w N N 000 �C4a aa_a M M N CI CI N 421r �'iiET'RO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 DATE SENT: TRANSMITTED TO FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET vr� Z�-/►+ 3y 19 CH2r STgu C /-r F ,Pi:�'v rd ,u TRANSMITTED FROM: UP - L / ,-.i 41 H (Name) (Mail Stop) 4 Sq. - 6-7$ s (Phone) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: NO. OF'PAGES TRANSMITTED: (Including Cover Sheet) FOR INTERNAL STAFF USE ONLY: (206) 684-1710 PROJECT: t2 2.' v C�-Z— 712 Up K c� � -.ARMS/TASK NO. SUBJECT: NOTES: W"1): THE Mc'ET lt4li 1 1L; 6f ,is 4-1i9 /93 10:06_12:00 AT$Ae-HED Aii&...6 , 11= 6.0 HA✓E wiSH { 9S57atjrs �N T,4E. McZ-7/.� � �Cchlr Cr-T 2/T'd OTLTt709902 S39IAH3S *iIDW3 OJ13W OS:CT E6, VT ddb CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT PHASE II MEETING AGENDA .PROJECT LIMITS 4/26/93 .METRO DESIGN CONCEPT & ISSUES/ PIPE ALIGNMENT & PROFILE .CITY DESIGN CONCEPT & ISSUES/ SEWER COLLECTION & STREET IMPROVEMENTS .AGENCIES' DESIGN RESPONSIBILITIES .ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW .COST SHARING RESPONSIBILITIES .CITY PERMITS/STREET USE PERMIT .OTHERS ?12,d OTZT1799902 =L-`,(13S 'c19N3 02d13W TS:ET E6, VT add CEDAR RIVER TRUNK -RELOCATION II ENGINEERING REPORT ARMS NO. A65021 - TASK NO. Y75 This project will reroute a portion of the existing 42-inch Cedar River pipeline, replacing concrete pipe with poly -lined ductile iron pipe. The project is located within the City of Renton in the vicinity of the Interstate 405/State Route 169 Interchange (see map 1). The new pipeline will be approximately 5000 feet long and it will be routed to provide a minimum clearance of 200 feet around City of Renton water production wells Nos. 1,2 and 3. BACKGROUND Originally constructed in the 1940's, these three wells were rebuilt in 1988 and now produce as much as 95% of the City of Renton's water supply. They are located in the Zone 1 Aquifer Protection Area (see map 2). Metro's 42-inch Cedar River Trunk line was constructed in 1964 using gasket reinforced concrete pipe. It provides sanitary sewer service to the City of Renton, Cedar River water district, the Soos Creek S&w district and the Cedar Hills Landfill site. There has been growing concern since the 701s, over the vulnerability of the sewer pipe joints to seismic events. The pipeline passes very close to the water production wells; within 20 feet in one instance. well monitoring tests show no sign of contamination from the pipeline as yet, but the nearness of the sewer provides no interception capability or warning in the event of pipeline rupture. The rerouted pipeline would permit the City to monitor ground water and take effective, timely action to prevent sewage from entering the City's water supply. The rerouted pipeline project was planned in three phases, with the first phase completed in 1991; Metro replaced a portion of the existing Cedar River Trunk line which lies beneath the I-405 "S-Curves". The second phase of the pipeline project will start west of Sunset Blvd. The City of Renton prefers all work to occur in North Renton to be part of phase II project. 1 2.12"d OTZTV89902 S30IAa3S 'H5W3 0a13W LO ST G6, 6T add There are five alternative routes to choose from in this phase. The recommended route is North Third Street. The pipeline will begin at the west end of North Brooks Street, then continue westerly to the intersection of North Brooks Street and Factory Avenue North; then turn North to the intersection of Factory Avenue North and North Third Street, continuing along North Third Street westerly to the intersection of Burnett Avenue North,.where the pipe will be connected to the existing Eastside Interceptor. The third phase of the project will begin at the existing Metro manhole R10-11 of a 42-inch sewer and will continue along the Maple Valley highway, north westerly to connect with the phase two project pipeline at the west end of North Brooks Street. When Phase III is completed, Metro's flows will be transferred to the new line from the existing line. The City of Renton will continue to use the old line, with improvements provided by Metro. Per memo of agreement dated November 16, 1992, the phase II pipe design and environmental review will be completed in 1993 and construction will take place in 1994. The phase III project will begin in 1996, after the Washington State Department of Transportation, I-405 interchange construction is completed. ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT The Cedar River Trunk Relocation will begin at the Metro sewer manhole R10-11 (see map), and follow along Maple Valley highway (SR 169) for 920 feet, turn to the northwest, bore under SR 169, I-405 and the Pacific Northern railroad; then continue westerly, to the intersection of North Brook Street and Factory Avenue north, where the pipeline connects with one of several North Renton neighborhood reroute alternatives. Alternative routes are briefly described below and may be traced on the route map at the end of this report. A. BR SON WAY ROUTE Parallel Maple Valley Hwy. to Bronson Way or route south from Brooks to Bronson, within Factory, then along Bronson to N First Street, reconnecting to the existing Cedar River Trunk. From Brooks, continue south on Factory to North Second Street, then west along N. 2nd Street, reconnecting to the Cedar River Trunk at Wells Avenue. V, OTZTV89902 S33IAa3S *N5W3 0613W LO ST E6, 6T 2Idd C NORTH THIRD_ _STREET From Brooks, continue north on Factory to North third Street, then west along N. 3rd Street, then connect to the existing Eastside Interceptor at Burnett Avenue North. D. NORTH FOURTH STREET From Brooks, continue north on Factory to N. 4th street, then west along 4th to the existing Eastside Interceptor. From Brooks, continue north on Factory to N. 4th street, then west along 4th to Garden avenue, then north on Garden Avenue to North Fifth Street and then west along North Fifth to the existing Eastside Interceptor. F. UTILID R Parallel the existing pipeline with a ^pipe -in -a -pipe" to achieve the desired containment in the event of a rupture. The utilidor would run from Manhole.R10-11 at Maple Valley Hwy, to the intersection of N. 1st Street and Wells Avenue. EVALUATION CRITERIA The following evaluation criteria was developed jointly by City of Renton and Metro staff. No attempt was made to rank or weight the importance of each criteria. A table is presented which assigns a value for each route, relative to the.remaining alternatives; order of preference is from 1 (high) to 5 (low), with the lowest totals electing the preferred alternatives. Aquifer Protection Is a measure of the separation between the new route and existing water wells for monitoring/intercept purposes, and in addition, physical disruption of the aquifer during construction (as evaluated by the City of Renton). COM=i ty E han cement The opportunity to combine restoration with improved appearance, or services. Landscaping, Renton's 'livable streets" program, and quality of access are included in this criteria. 3 Litr'd OTZTV89902 S39I,Aa3S 'a%3 0813W 00:ST ES, 6T Mali Renton Utility and Transportation ProJe_ct_Coordination Coordination of projects limits rework and minimizes community disruption. Certain coincident benefits are achieved through mutual restoration. Some routes will enable Renton and Metro to improve service and life expectancy of existing sewers. Cos A preliminary cost estimate has been developed for each of the alternatives ( see attached), based on the 42- inch poly -lined ductile iron pipe. In addition to labor and materials, costs include mobilization, demobilization, contingency, sales tax, engineering, and administrative costs. PhYsical Limitation Considers the available hydraulic profile and utility conflicts or relocation required to build the route. Construction Impacts Traffic impacts, right-of-way conflicts, and vibration impacts to relatively old neighborhood homes are included in this criteria. Comnarinon of Alternativpa Bronson N.2nd N.3rd N.41h N.5th Utilidor Aquifer Protection 4 3 2 1 1 5 Community Enhancement 4 3 1 2 3 4 Coordination w/ Renton 4 3 1 1 3 5 Lifetime Cost 1 2 3 4 5 3 Physical Limitations 4 3 1 2 3 3 Construction Impacts 5 5 3 4 2 1 Totals 22 19 11 14 1 17 21 4 2.1s,d OTZTV89902 S3JIA63S 'iDW3 0613W 00:ST E6, 6T 6dd DISCUSSION The preferred alternative is N. 3rd Street, which balances cost with benefits to the City of Renton, minimizes community disruption, and improves both Metro's and Renton's sewer condition and capacity in the Renton service area. Metro's portion of the work is estimated to be $3,044,048 as shown on the attached estimate sheet. This figure assumes certain benefits for combined restoration and reasonable permit fees. As the design develops, there will be opportunities to refine the numbers before the 1994 budget process. This recommendation is based on the North 3rd, 4th and Sth Street alternatives which were evaluated as preferred routes by the City of Renton, who focused their efforts primarily on Aquifer protection. RECOMMENDATION We recommend rerouting the pipeline along North 3rd Street (Alternative C). This pipe alignment will minimize community disruption while maximizing coincidental benefits to the City of Renton. As part of the sewer trunk line, the City in conjunction with Metro, will construct roadway improvements to allow future downgrading of North Third from a one-way arterial to a two-way local neighborhood street. The switching of North Third from one-way to two-way will occur when North Fourth Street is upgraded to a two-way arterial by a future project. (A construction schedule for North Fourth Street has not yet been established). An extra unused lane along the north side of Third Street, between Factory Avenue North and Wells Avenue North, may provide a better working zone for construction crews and less interruption to street traffic than the other alternatives. On September 29, 1992, Metro and the City of Renton held a public meeting to present alternative routes for relocating the existing Cedar River Trunk. The engineers discussed the. criteria they are using to evaluate each route. At the end of the two hour session, the Third Street alternative received substantial community support. PROJECT SCHEDULE This Engineering Report will be circulated for staff review and comments within Metro and Renton. The final report will be completed after comments are received. Metro will coordinate project schedules and scope definition with Renton as the process proceeds. The preliminary project schedule is attached. 5 2.i9'd 0TLTb09902 S33IAd3S 'b9N3 Od13W 60:ST E6, 6T ddd The SEPA document will be a DNS or ONSM. SEPA review will be for the entire project. 'The review period will be 45 days from issuance of draft to final, which includes the writing, review, production, notification, issuance, and final document. Permits and easements will be acquired from the City of Renton, WSDOT, Burlington Northern, and other private owners. The longest lead item is expected to be the acquiring of the easement from the private property owner just west of 1-405. To avoid interference with WSDOT's South Renton Sunset HOV Project, phase II of the project will start in the North Renton Neighborhood in 1994. The remaining pipe construction will begin after WSDOT completes the HOV lane construction. The phase II pipeline construction is estimated to take approximately four months to complete. The City's Collection Sewer improvement project will follow Metro's pipeline construction about half way. The City estimates it will take approximately six months to complete their work. The City of Renton has suggested to combine the pipeline reroute project and the City's Street Improvement project in one contract, a further discussion will be conducted on this issue. [.1 Liz a OTZTV89902 S33IA63S *65W3 0613W 60:ST E6, 6T 6dd Engineering Report CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT PHASE II May 1993 Metro Engineering Services Division (ARMS number A65021; Task number Y75) CONTENTS Scope of Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Description of Phase II Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . S Evaluation of Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Recommendation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Project Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 TABLES 1. Evaluation of Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2. Preliminary Cost Estimates for Each Phase II Alternative, Including the Phase III Alignment . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3. Phase II Project Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 FIGURES 1. Vicinity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Renton Zone 1 Aquifer Protection Area and Production Wells . . . . 3 3. Cedar River Trunk Alignments . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT PHASE II SCOPE OF WORK This project will reroute a portion of the existing 42-inch-diameter Cedar River Trunk, replacing concrete pipe with poly -lined ductile iron pipe. The project is located within the City of Renton in the vicinity of the Interstate 405/State Route 169 (Maple Valley Highway) interchange (see Figure 1). The new pipeline will be approximately 5,000 feet long. It will be routed to provide a minimum clearance of 200 feet around City of Renton water production wells no. 1,2, and 3. This engineering report was circulated for staff review and comments within Metro and City of Renton. All comments have been incorporated into the report. BACKGROUND Metro's 42-inch-diameter Cedar River Trunk was constructed in 1964 using gasket reinforced concrete pipe. It provides sanitary sewer service to the City of Renton, the Cedar River Water District, the Soos Creek Sewer and Water District, and the Cedar Hills Landfill. Concern has been growing since the 1970s over the vulnerability of the sewer pipe joints to seismic events. The pipeline passes very near the City's water production wells no. 1,2, and 3, within 20 feet in one instance. Originally constructed in the 1940s, these three wells were rebuilt in 1988 and now produce as much as 95 percent of the City of Renton's water supply. They are located in the Zone 1 Aquifer Protection Area (see Figure 2). Well monitoring tests show no sign of contamination from the pipeline, but the nearness of the pipeline precludes interception or warning capability in the event of pipeline rupture. The rerouted pipeline would permit the City to monitor groundwater and take effective, timely action to prevent sewage from entering the City's water supply. The rerouted pipeline project was planned in three phases. Phase I was completed in 1991. During Phase I, Metro replaced a portion of the existing Cedar River Trunk that lies beneath the I-405 "S-Curves" (see Figure 3). Phase II of the pipeline project will start west of Sunset Boulevard. The City of Renton prefers that Phase II include any project work that needs to be done in North Renton. Six alternative routes were considered for the Phase II alignment (see Figure 3). The recommended route is North Third Street. The pipeline will begin at the west end of North Brooks Street, continue west to the intersection of North Brooks Street and Factory Avenue North, turn north to the intersection of Factory Avenue North and North Third Street, and then continue west along North Third Street to the intersection of Burnett Avenue North, where the pipeline will connect to the existing Eastside Interceptor. 'I 6 Gig Harbor • Snohomish s Monroe Snohomish County 104 5 52'Bothell Duvall 1 202 203 5 Des Moines Project Location • 1-1 Issa uah soo q Renton Kent 18 516 Carnation Maple Valley ss Black \ Auburn Diamond =ircrest 164 • « — - *Tacoma • 167 \ Milton 167 Sumner � Figure 1. Vicinity Map 2 all City Snoqualmie North Bend Figure 2. Renton Zone 1 Aquifer Production Area and Production Wells 3 Figure 3. Cedar River Trunk Alignments Ii Phase III of the project will begin at the existing Metro manhole R10-11 of the Cedar River Trunk and will continue northwest along the Maple Valley Highway, to connect with the Phase II project pipeline at the west end of North Brooks Street (see Figure 3). The alignment will bore under the Maple Valley Highway, I-405, and the Burlington Northern Railroad. When Phase III is completed, Metro's flows will be transferred from the existing line to the new line. The City of Renton's flows will continue in the old line, with improvements provided by Metro. According to a memo of agreement dated November 16, 1992, the Phase II pipeline design and environmental review will be completed in 1993 and construction will take place in 1994. The Phase III project will begin in 1996, after the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) completes the South Renton Sunset HOV Project. DESCRIPTION OF PHASE II ALTERNATIVES With the exception of Alternatives Al and F, all alternatives start at the terminus of the Phase III alignment at the west end of North Brooks Street. Figure 3 shows these alternatives in relation to the existing alignment that will be replaced. Alternative A. Bronson Way Alternative Al. Starts at the intersection of the Maple Valley Highway with North Brooks Street, parallels the Maple Valley Highway to Bronson Way North, and continues along Bronson Way North to connect to the existing Cedar River Trunk at the intersection of Bronson Way North with North First Street and Park Avenue North. Alternative A2. Starts at the west end of North Brooks Street, continues south along Factory Avenue North to Bronson Way North, and continues southwest along Bronson Way North to connect with the existing Cedar River Trunk at the intersection of Bronson Way North with North First Street and Park Avenue North. Alternative B. North Second Street Starts at the west end of North Brooks Street, continues south on Factory Avenue North to North Second Street, and then continues west along North Second Street, reconnecting to the Cedar River Trunk at Wells Avenue North. Alternative C. North Third Street Starts at the west end of North Brooks Street, continues north on Factory Avenue North to North Third Street, and then continues west along North Third Street, connecting to the existing Eastside Interceptor at Burnett Avenue North. Alternative D. North Fourth Street Starts at the west end of North Brooks Street, continues north on Factory Avenue North to North Fourth Street, and then continues west along North 5 Fourth Street, connecting to the existing Eastside Interceptor at Burnett Avenue North. Alternative E. North Fifth Street Starts at the west end of North Brooks Street, and then continues north on Factory Avenue North to North Fourth Street, west along North Fourth Street to Garden Avenue North, north on Garden Avenue North to North Fifth Street, and west along North Fifth Street, connecting to the existing Eastside Interceptor at Burnett Avenue North. Alternative F. Utilidor Parallels the existing pipeline with a "pipe -in -a -pipe" to achieve the desired containment in the event of a rupture. The utilidor would run from Manhole R10-11 at Maple Valley Highway to the intersection of North First Street and Wells Avenue North. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES The following evaluation criteria were developed jointly by City of Renton and Metro staff. No attempt was made to rank or weight the importance of each criterion. A value of 1 to 5 was assigned for each criterion for each alternative relative to the other alternatives. Order of preference is from 1 (high) to 5 (low). Individual values for each criterion were summed to give a total for each alternative. The lowest totals indicated the preferred alternatives. The values and totals are shown in Table 1. Aquifer Protection This criterion is a measure of the separation between an alternative route and existing water wells for monitoring and intercepting purposes. It also indicates the physical disruption of the aquifer during construction of an alternative (as evaluated by the City of Renton). Community Enhancement This criterion measures the opportunity to improve appearance or services in conjunction with implementing an alternative. Included are landscaping, Renton's "livable streets" program, and quality of traffic flow. Coordination with Renton Projects Cost Coordination with City of Renton utility and transportation projects limits rework, minimizes community disruption, and achieves coincident benefits through mutual improvements. Some alternatives will enable Renton and Metro to improve service and life expectancy of existing sewers. A preliminary cost estimate was developed for each alternative including the Phase III alignment (see Table 2 on page 9), based on the 42-inch-diameter poly -lined ductile iron pipe. In addition to labor and materials, the estimate R includes mobilization, demobilization, contingency, sales tax, engineering, and administrative costs. Physical Limitations This criterion considers the available hydraulic profile, utility conflicts, and utility relocation required to build the route. Construction Impacts This criterion includes traffic impacts, right-of-way conflicts, and vibration impacts to relatively old neighborhood homes during construction of an alternative. Table 1 Evaluation of Alternatives Bronson Second Third Fourth Fifth Utilidor Aquifer 4 3 2 1 1 5 Protection Community 4 3 1 2 3 4 Enhancement Coordination 4 3 1 1 3 5 with Renton Lifetime 1 2 3 4 5 3 Cost Physical 4 3 1 2 3 3 Limitations Construction 5 5 3 4 2 1 Impacts Total 1 22 1 19 1 11 1 14 1 17 1 21 RECOMMENDATION The recommended alternative is Alternative C, North Third Street. This alternative balances cost with benefits. The reasons for selecting Alternative C are as follows: • Its total value resulting from the evaluation process was the most favorable of all the alternatives (see Table 1). • It ranked favorably in terms of the aquifer protection criterion, which was the primary focus for the City of Renton. • It minimizes community disruption during construction. • It improves the condition and capacity of both Metro's and the City's sewers in the Renton service area. • It maximizes coincidental benefits to the City. • It received considerable community support in a public meeting held on September 29, 1992, by Metro and the City to present alternatives. 7 Metro's portion of the work including Phase III is estimated to be $3,044,048, as shown in Table 2. This figure assumes certain benefits for combined improvements and reasonable permit fees. As the design develops, there will be opportunities to refine the numbers before the 1994 budget process. As part of the Phase II work, the City, in conjunction with Metro, will construct roadway improvements to allow future downgrading of North Third Street from a one-way arterial to a two-way local neighborhood street. The downgrading will occur when North Fourth Street is upgraded to a two-way arterial. (A construction schedule for North Fourth Street has not yet been established.) An extra unused lane along the north side of North Third Street, between Factory Avenue North and Wells Avenue North, may provide a better working zone for construction crews and less interruption to street traffic than the other alternatives. PROJECT SCHEDULE The preliminary project schedule is shown in Table 3. Metro will continue to coordinate project schedules and define the scope with the City of Renton as the process proceeds. At this point it is expected that the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) document will be a DNS or DNSM. SEPA review will be for Phase II only. The minimum review period will be 45 days from issuance of draft to final, which includes writing, review, production, notification, and issuance. Permits and easements will be acquired from the City of Renton, WSDOT, Burlington Northern Railroad, and other private owners. The longest lead time is expected for acquiring the easement from the private property owner just west of I-405. To avoid interference with WSDOT's South Renton Sunset HOV Project, Phase II will be completed in 1994. Phase III will begin after WSDOT completes the HOV lane construction. Phase II construction is estimated to take approximately 4 months to complete. The City's collection sewer improvement project will parallel Metro's pipeline construction about half way. The City estimates it will take approximately 6 months to complete its work. The City has suggested that the Cedar River Trunk reroute project and the City's North Third Street improvement project be combined in one contract. Further discussion will be conducted on this topic. Table 2 Preliminary Cost Estimates for Each Phase II Alternative Including the Phase III Alignment Bronson Second Third I Fourth I Fifth I Utilidor Duration (workdays) 135 150 1801 2401 2401 240 Len th Oinear feet 4,185 4,525 4,955 5,625 6 200 3,360 General Conditions $84,000 S70,000 S84,000 S105,000 S105,000 $105,000 Shoring Provisions S184 950 S208,750 S238,850 S285,750 S326,000 S207,000 Construction Items Excavation S31468 S34,629 S38,626 S44,855 S54,216 S29,381 Hauling Unsuitable Materials S17,552 S19,315 S21 544 $25 019 S30 40 S16,389 Imported Backfill S31 593 S34 767 $38 780 S45 033 S54 432 S30 041 Native Backfill S107 819 S118 648 S132 344 S153 685 S185 760 S100 670 Grading S22 500 $22 500 S22,5001 S22 500 S22 500 S22 500 Seed S7,9881 S7 988 S7 988 S7 988 S7 988 S7 988 Planting S50 000 S50 000 S50 000 S50 000 S50 000 S50 000 Preparing Subgrade $3 929 S4 581 SS 405 S6 689 $6 10 S3 366 Preparing Crushed Base $17 425 S20,315 S23,970 S29,665 S27,540 S 14,927 Pavement S24,258 S28,282 S33,370 S41,298 S38,340 S20,780 Relocating Utilities $0 SO Sol SO $0 S425,000 Pipeline (except cased i $382,505 S420,925 S469,515 S545,225 S610 200 S379,680 Dewatering $109 674 $120 690 $134,622 $156,330 $174,960 S0 Manholes $75,000 S80,000 S90,000 S95,000 10,000 50,000 Jacking/CasingJacking/Casing S548 000 $548,000 S548,000 S548 000 S730 400 S412 500 Jacking/Receiving Pits $202 500 $202,500 S202 500 S202,500 S202 500 SO Cleaning & Grouting Abandoned Line S67 340 $90,856 S110,630 S 110,630 $110 630 S89,787 Bid Total $1,973,501 S2,087,744 S2,257 645 $2,480 167 S2,751,916 S1,970,008 Contingency 10% S197 350 $208,744 S225 764 S248,017 S275 192 $197,001 Tax @ 8.2% S178,010 S188,314 S203,6401 S223,711 S248223 S177 695 Permits/Easements S45,000 S45,000 545,0001 S45,000 S45,000 S105,000 Administration/ Inspection $284,000 S289,000 S312,0001 S346,000 S346,000 S446,000 Estimated Lifetime Cost $2 677,860 $2,818 33 $3 043,048 $3,342 94 $3,66630 $2 895 703 Table 3 Phase II Project Schedule Task Expected Dates Predesign Phase Draft Engineering Report 3/16/'93 Report Review & Comments 3/16/93 to 3/30/93 Environmental Review/SEPA 6/15/93 to 9/17/93 Survey Request 3/15/93 to 5/1/93 Soil Investigation 3/1/93 to 4/1/93 Traffic Stud 3/1/93 to 4/15/93 Negotiate/Obtain Permits 12/1/93 to 5/15/93 Design Phase 30% Pipe Design & Specifications 4/15/93 to 6/15/93 30% Design Review & Comments 6/16/93 to 6/30/93 90% Pipe Design & Specifications 7/1/93 to 8/2/93 90% Design Review & Comments 8/5/93 to 8/19/93 Construction Cost Estimates 8/23/93 to 8/27/93 Requests for Bids 8/5/93 to 9/3/93 Final Design Revision 9/6/93 to 9/27/93 Pre -Construction Phase Print Bid Documents 3/29/94 to 4/2/94 Authority to Advertise 3/24/94 to 4/7/94 Advertising for Bids 4 12/94 to 5 12 94 Pre -Bid Meeting/Job Tour 5 3 4 Bid Opening 512 4 Bid Evaluation 5 13 4 to 5/20/94 Preparation for Council Authorization 5/24 4 to 6 /94 Notice of Award 6/8 4 Notice to Proceed 6 10/94 Construction Phase Pre -Construction Meeting 6/14/94 Construction 6/15/94 to 10/14/94 Punch List Items 10/15/94 to 11/5/94 As -Built Completion 11/5/94 to 12/6/94 Project Close -Out 12/6/94 10 Vi�:R1ETRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 • (206) 684-2100 May 18,1993 90477 L38 Mr. Dave Christensen Wastewater Utility Engineer Utility Systems Division Public Works Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Cedar River Trunk Relocation Phase II Engineering Report Dear Dave; Attached is the final engineering report for your review. Your comments have been carefully looked at and incorporated into this report. If you concur with the report, please sign both letters in the space provided below and return for our records. We look forward to receiving by June 1, 1993. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, ///a, " / Mann -Ling 7ibert,P.E. Project Manager MLT/ s c : mk*,s_ Enclosure Wastewa Utility ris en Utility Engineer Systems Division original one copy to me your response 5_ �3 Date 206-689-3706 METRO WPCD COMM 397 P01 MAR 09 194 Oe:34 Post-11" U­KI Fax Transmittal M�etmo /p7672 No. of Pages Today'sOa� / 6 To ilD GH N LC. f` DA G From [ t;ompsny t � C. Ft l� l 5 ►�'C � S �f�.) c°"'°a"Y Location Location Dept, Ch-qu Fax # a-7 ^tl �� '1 p 7alepnone Y Fax # -70 / TElaphone s comments Original Originalb (� Disposition' El Dsatray 7, Return T." 6fii- ftLt-3 ❑ Call for pickup { Av / q 6 k1 �r. Update March, 1994 Cedar River Trunk relocation, street ��i improvements to begin on North Third Metro has issued a SEPA determination of non -significance (DNS) for street improvements and pipeline construction along North Third Street in Renton. The work is part of a joint project called the Cedar River 'Dunk relocation project. As part of a memorandum of understanding between the City of Renton and Metro, Metro agreed to move a portion of its sewer interceptor, the Cedar River Trunk- The first phase of that work was accomplished in 1992. Phase II construction will begin this summer in conjunction with the narrowing of North Third Street by the City of Renton. Phase III will proceed in 1995 or 1996 when a route under I--405 has been chosen for the final portion of the relocated pipeline. During construction of Phase IT, traffic built separately. Metro's pipeline will be constricted in the middle of North Third between Burnett Ave. N. and Factory Ave. N_, from North Third along Factory to Brooks, and along Brooks to approximately the railroad track_ The City of Renton will erftad the existing curbs of North Third inward by approximately four feet on each side, narrowing the existing street width by a total of eight feet. Future traffic flow improvements will affect both North 'Thud and North Fourth streets and are part of Renton's Liveable Streets program. For information about the street improvements, please call Rod Schindler at 277 6291 or you may write to him at the City of Renton, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. S., Renton, WA 98055. will be allowed in two of the existing If you have questions about the pipeline lanes along North Third_ Construction relocation project or you would like to methods for the pipeline will c-aA%s*44d&MkVII f,Mobtain a copy of the DNS, please call Qr Ae vibration, and hours of Ron Post at Metro, Water Pollution construction will be arranged to reduce Control Department of Metropolitan impacts on the neighborhood. King County, 684-1143. You can also write to him at Metro, 821 Second Ave., Residents will experience fewer M.S. 95, Seattle, WA 98104-1598. construction impacts than if the street improvement and pipeline projects were 0 ,��TIETFRC3 Kiln county of 1 =W4Dpolit3- Services �I n�cEIVED / 0/09-1' „METRO PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle CITY OF RENTON Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 9810 . G G October 5, 1992 ci T C RE�.�TON `� pEpt. Dear North Renton Resident: Er�n� On Tuesday, Sept. 29, Metro and the City of Renton held a public meeting to discuss alternative routes for relocating the 42-inch Cedar River trunk sewer line. This pipeline now runs along the Cedar River above the city's sole source aquifer and will be moved to add protection to the city's water supply. The two agencies are working on the project jointly. At the public meeting, engineers from the City of Renton and Metro outlined six alternatives for relocating the trunk line. The engineers discussed the criteria they are using to evaluate each route. They answered 23 questions from the audience, and at the end of two hours the community representatives agreed that North Third Street between Factory and Burnett seemed to be the best of the alternatives. One of the primary reasons for this choice is the planned improvements to North Third Street and North Fourth Street by the City of Renton's Transportation Systems Division. Citizens may still comment about this choice or any of the other alternatives. A formal comment period that is part of the environmental review will begin sometime in late October or November. Citizens will be notified how they can comment on the environmental process at that time. If you wish to receive a summary of the public meeting, or if you would like to comment on any of the alternatives, please call me at 684-1143. You may write to me at Metro, Exchange Building, 821 Second Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104- 1598. Or you may call the City of Renton's project manager, Dave Christensen, at 277-6212 and you may write to him at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Thank you. Sincerely, Ron Post Community Relations Water Pollution Control Department • (206) 684-1280 • Clean Water -A Sound Investment CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: April 4, 1992 TO: Dave Chn ens FROM: s orns SUBJECT: Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Alternative Routes The Water Utility has reviewed the 6 relocation route alternatives and has the following concerns/comments: 1. The preferred relocation routes would be North 3rd Street, North 4th Street, or North 5th Street. These routes are preferred because they are the greatest distance from the City's production wells and closer to the outside boundary of the APA. Allowing more distance provides the City with more options and time for detecting a leak/spill and containing or cleaning up an incident with minimal impact to the City's water supply system. 2. The Water Utility has much concern about the utilidor alternative. We feel that construction of this alternative while maintaining aquifer protection would be very difficult. The current alignment of the trunk runs very close to the City's production wells. We would prefer to have the trunk relocated as far from the wells as possible. If this route is selected, the utilidor should start at the entrance of Cedar River Park and continue to the manhole at the intersection of North 1st and Wells Ave N at a minimum. In addition, the Water Utility would expect to heavily involved in the development of the aquifer protection and construction plans for this project. 3. The routes on Bronson Way and North 2nd provide very little additional distance away from the City's production wells than currently exists. Since the trunkline is being relocated, we would like the line reconstructed as far from the City's production wells as possible (i.e. at the furthest reaches of APA zone 1 or outside of the APA) '—'-"-OCT-00-192 THU 10:11 ID:METP.O-COMMUNICAT IONS TEL NO! (206)601-2126 tt703 P01 OMETRO Mnnicipa3ity of Metropolitan Scattic Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle. WA 98104-1599 FAX To:- Fax #: 135'7 �sl From-- Po S Phone: Fax #: Subject:. F y, Instructions: Pages (including this page): OCT-00-'92 THU 10!11 ID:METP.O-COMMUHICPT IONS TEL N0:(206)60,1-2126 ff703 P02 1 October 3, 1992 �ZQ'GPJ' Note to Ron Post3 I Wish to thank you for your courtesy in FAYing the papers to me. 'they were indeed appreciated. You grid yourrj are presenting Metro in a better light than has sometimes been done in the past. Metro hasn't always sent the best messenger to represent itself, or even thu iwet LLieaaage, as I see it. I still worry some about the mc3oagc, though. I don't Know it North 3rd is the best LuuLe, buL it Lhat is what the group Wants, so be it. I understand that the audience was relatively small (ac there are over 45U owners) and that North 3rd wdb spdtauly Lepirsw11Le1j Lhere. IF North 3rd owners were notified and didn't show, again so be it. I t.rnst ynnr nntire rnvpragP was complete or fairly complete. (Witte ILLY VLcptrrlSiLY fcr wajuriLy-plus decisions, I often wonder if there is a little anarchy or, at least, group demnrraey in my soul, I was born and lived in the wrong places for the groovy New England Town Hall government experience I've dreamed about ... not to be confused with Perot-tinitis. Perhaps, too, with. the political elite and wannabes noL doing very well by us, we might want to reinstitute Town-Hallism elsewhere or mob democracy ... or even a tiny bit of anarchy.) Sorry; i digress. If North 3rd holds in there as the inter.ccrtor r01]ta nf choice, I would like to present to you the following idea. The Woods and Wautlet families, home owners on Brooks, both elderly couples, should not be unduly inronvanienr.Pc3. T understand they protested all the routes that would go in front of their homes, and I believe they also suggested that the interceptor line go down Factory, rrn9sing tinder the freeway farther south than was shown on the map. That's a great ouggcotion for a couple of reasons, but I would carry it ono star mnrp. Tf Far.tnry Avenue is used, then it would make sense that the line yu treat the curb on Lhe EASTERLY oidc of the street where there would be fewer homer. at risk ac wall as fewer occupants inconvenienced. The two business alorig that sheet dLe tavLe dole Lo make claims or absorb any cooto of damages than the home owners on the west side of the street. Further, on the easterly side or the street, in ddditivii Lu Lhe Lwu busilicases, Lhere are only a few residences involved. Please consider this. I would appreciate your sending me, by regular mail, a copy of the signup ghePt fir attpndpps. Again, thank you for your courtesy. Sincerely yours, Warren F. Et Vercie Vaupei 1-314-894-3895 2O60 Telegraph Rued veraic vaupel ' P.U. Box 16367 Lemay MO 63126 RECORD OF VERBAL COMMUNICATION By:d Date: Spoke to: 1' P (% Phone #: (3/ y) $9 y-- 5U:5— Address: Project: Subject: P,�- - "(- er ,,2 C F'r ✓! S- Summary: l-rr1':�' 1� iP u r2a 'ra v e fh a � O r / u ` %E Ti�O cCl,-7 5 u e- i9 a'r, UC', 15 -5 er �r� O 10 fjDUS�S, p rPf�iS rid tr/Or� O✓/ fly �S� S�i PpTJ_ �-Ia 0 ,o`' ors y;Io� or J9e9r-/,/. L&Ioc1 1d 1111, Q /1 drl 1'01e-rl r!'lC� i /� c� /0 �Ier5 %e ila a,az bralcWt1wh.ebal -OCT-02-192 FP.I 12:22 ID:METP.O-COMMUNICAT IONS TEL NO: (206)60,1-2126 tt750 P02 .H.METRo Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 October 5, 1992 DRAFT Dear North Renton Resident: On Tuesday, Sept. 29, Metro anti the City of Renton held a public meeting to discuss alternative routes for relocating the 42-inch Cedar River trunk sewer line. 'Phis pipeline now runs along the Cedar River above the city's sole source aquifer and will be moved to add protection to the city's water supply. The two agencies are working on the project jointly. At the public meeting, engineers from the City of Renton and Metro outlined six alternatives for relocating the trunk line. The engineers discussed the criteria they are using to evaluate each route. They answered 23 questions fLvut the audience, and at the end of two hours the community representatives agreed that North Third Street between Factory and Burnett seemed to be the best of the alternatives. oiie of the primary reasons for thio ohoiee ie the planned improvemeggto to th Third Street by the (Katy's ransportationvstems V151G11. Citizens may still comment about this choica or any of the other alternatives. A formal comment period that is part of the environmental review will begin sometime in late October or November. Citizens will be notified how they can comment on the environmental process at that time. If you with to receivo a summary of the puhl.ic- meeting, or if ynii would like to comment on any of the alternatives, please call nie at 684-1143. You may write to me at Metro, Exchange Building, 821 Second Avenue, Seatrlp, WA 98104- 1596. Or you may call the city of Renton's project manager, Dave christensen, at 277-6212 and you may write to him at 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Thank you. Sincerely, Ron Post community Relations Water Pollution Control Department 9 (206) 6&k-1280 0 Clean Water -A Sound Investment iin E n 7 : Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 September 14, 1992 Notice of public meeting Alternatives for relocating Cedar River trunk line On Tuesday, Sept. 29, 7 p.m., the City of Renton and Metro will hold a public meeting at the Renton Senior Center, 211 Burnett Ave.i')6. , to discuss possible routes for relocating Metro's Cedar River trunk sewer line. At the meeting, Metro and Renton staff will present information about six possible routes for the sewer line. People who live or operate businesses along the routes are invited to attend the public meeting and share their thoughts on which route would be best. The routes are outlined on the back side of this page. Metro and the City of Renton have agreed to move the pipeline to provide more protection to the city's drinking water aquifer. Both agencies are asking the community's help to determine the best route. If you would like more information about the project but cannot attend the meeting, or if you wish to comment or ask questions about this project, please call Ron Post, Metro Water Quality Communications, at 684-1143 or Dave Christensen, City of Renton Wastewater Utility, at 277-6212. Or you may write Ron Post at Metro, Water Quality Communications M.S. 95, Exchange Building, 821 Second Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104- 1598 and Dave Christensen at the City of Pentcn 200 M-4 —1 1 Ave. S., Renton, WA 98031. Directions to Renton Senior Center: FROM RAINIER AVE. S: At south end of Renton Airport, turn east on Airport Way, cross bridge, turn right. FROM I-405: Take Renton Exit 2 (Rainier Avenue South) and go north through cloverleaf. Straight on Rainier Avenue South to Airport Way. Turn right, cross bridge, turn right into parking. Water Pollution Control Department • (206) 684-1280 • Clean Water —A Sound Investment Alternatives for relocating the Cedar River trunk sewer line. Heavy black line shows present location and dashed lines show five other alternative routes for the pipeline. :16 rT1ETR0 Communications Water Pollution Control Department 821 Second Ave., M.S. 95 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 E c I LP SEP 1992 C�OF i', BULKRATCITYEngineerin P-PAIDAGE SEATTLE, WA PERMIT NO. 836 067673253 DAVE CHRISTENSEN CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVt S RENTON,, WA 98C55 k4 l� THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBUC WORKS RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 - 2189 PHONE: 23-52631 FAX: 235-2541 FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: TO: FAX FROM: SUBJECT: Number of pages excluding cover sheet SEP-09-192 WED 02!05 ID:METP.O-COMMUNICAT IONS TEL NO-(206)6C/1-2126 tt569 P02 CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT September, 1992 (picture at top of page) Last year the City of Renton and Metro made plans to relocate tho 42-inch Cedar River Trunk sewer line to beLLer protect the city,seq-aifer. B2fnrn the planning process waa over, oonotruction on Interstate 105 made it necessary to move a small part of the pipeline, but the planning press continued. 5 �a� 4.,fter public discussion off - ltcY11at1VCa, planiiels and engineers from the City of Renton and Metro will identify the beet location for the pipeline. Tho project schedule will then be identified and more public meetings will be trieid. This public information document dascribas the six alternatives for relocating the sewer line. It answers some questions that have been asked about the project at previous public meetings. If you would like to comment on the route altcrnativcz, please call or send your comments to one of the following people: SEP-09-192 WED 00!05 ID!METP.O-COMMUNICATIONS TEL N0!(206)60/1-2126 tt569 P0:� Dave Christensen City of Renton Wastewater Utility Division 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 980� Ron Post �� Metro water Pollution Control Department 821 Second Ave. Seattle, WA 98104-1598 phone: 277-6212 phone: 684-1143 Q. Why does the sever line need to be relocated A. To gain more protection for the city's ,aquifer. Metro and Renton staff have identified six alternatives. Q. Which alternatives are being considered? A. The six alternatives (Figure 1) can be described as follows: /)17aIC2D`eJ A. building a new pipe -within -a -pipe along the existing route rough Cedar River Park and -lam Liberty Park x (�C�"1�LDt �,, IST:5T— B. moving the pipeline under Bronson Way then hooking up with the existing pipe; C. moving the pipeline under Second Avenue tnen connecting to the existing pipe. D. moving the pipeline undcr Third Avcnuc then hooking up with the Edstside iriLerceptor F11eng R13rn@tt Avenue North; SEP-09-'92 ICED 02:06 ID:METP.O-COMMUNICATIONS TEL N0:(206)62,1-2126 H569 Pal E. moving the pipeline under Fourth AvPnuP then hooking up with the Eastside interocptor along Burnett Avenue North; P. moving the pipeline under Fifth Avenue then hooking up with the Eastside interceptor along Burnett Avenue North; _ Q. Are the alternatives different from the onQs %Qlacted for public presentation last year? A. There are come new alternatives. The six alternative routes and criteria used to evaluate them are the result of cooperation bewteen the City of Rcnton and Metro. Staff engineers have worked lvyeLher Lu QeLermine routes that would best serve the planning efforts of both agencies. Q. What are the benefits of planniny and duuomplishinq those projects jointly-: A. North Renton's aging sewer lines and traffic dictribution patterns require solutions within the next few years. if Metro and the City of Renton build their projects jointly, there may be less disruption to the neighborhood and fewer costs associated with all of the projects. Q. What if the project isn't done? will the aquifer be harmed in any way? A. The relocated pipeline will provide more protection for the aQuiter because most of thA AltArnativA rn»tAa tAkG fihA 3 SEP-09-'92 WED 09!06 ID! METP.O-COMMUNICAT IONS TEL �10!(206)6S/I-2126 H569 P05 sewer line farther away from Zone 1, which --eanter of the aquiver and=re location of Renton's primary production wells. Choosing one of those alternatives would allow for a greater degree of protection should any break occur in the w.�s 5 �1':9� line. En which lie between l�f�; II the routes er, could be used to monitor and �pump water i a n�� Q. Will the construction of a new pipeline through the north Renton neighborhood cause damage to structures? A. With newer methods of construction, engineers can excavate and backfi 1 1 wi t.hniit rAircing ciamagn to nparhy propertioG. Q. what is the desired project schedule-e A. Tharp are two poccibiliti®c for completing the project. One schedule would allow the project to begin in late 1993 or early in 1994, after public involvement and the selection of tho best alternative. Part of the new trunk line, east of Interstate 405, would be deferred until 1996 or later until I-405 improvements are completed. i'he n� alternative is to defer all work until at least 1996. Q. Hhdt ate the pros and cons of each schedule'. A. Tf the PntirP p,rnjac-t bAginc in 1993, At 1rA-,t cnme of the city's planned sewer and etrcct improvements could be incorporated into the construction schedule. If most of the SEP-39-'92 WED 32-.2 ID METRO -COMMUNICATIONS TEL NO!(236)62,1-2126 tt569 PO6 pLoject begins in 1996, then the street and utility improvements may be disrupted and the neighborhood would have construction twice within a 3-4 year period. Q. How long will the construction take? A. The pipeline relocation would take about four months UV complata_ in addition, the City of Renton's sewer improvements could take about six months to complete. Q. What are the criteria used to evaluate the various alternative? A. The criteria are listed below. No order of importance is given. - Aquifer protection Construction impacts utility right -of -Dray conflicts Effects on eity's collection system - community enhancements t! SPEED LETTER TO: `ice DATE:— /L(D S � •' s FAWAF I d, gned • SEP-09-'92 WED 00:05 ID:METP.O-COMMUNICAT IDNS TEL MO:(206)60/1-2126 tt569 P02 CEDAR RIVER TRUNK REWCATION PROJECT Y/ _ September, 1992 (picture at top of page) Last year the City of Renton and Metro made plans to relocate tho 42-inch Cedar River Trunk sewer line to bel.l.er protect the city's aquifer. Before the planning process was ovcr, eonctruction on Interetate 405 made it necessary to move a small part of the pipeline, but the planning process continued. After public discussion of sit alternatives, planners and engineers from the City or Renton and Metro will identify the beat location for the pipeline. The project schedule will then be identified and more public meetings will be held. This public information document dascribns the six alternatives for relocating the sewer line. It answers some questions that have been asked about the project at previous public meetings. If you would like to comment on the route altcrnativcc, please call or send your comments to one of the following people: SEP-09-'92 WED 39*35 ID:METP.O-COMMUNICATIOMS TEL N0!(23G)60,1-2126 H569 PO-) Dave Christensen phone: 277-6212 City of Renton Wastewater Utility Division 200 Hill Ave. S. Renton, WA 9809-� Ron Post phone: 684-1143 Metro water Pollution Control Department 821 Second Ave. Seattle, WA 98104-1598 Q. Why does the sever line need to be relocated? A. To gain more protection for the city's aquifer. Metro and Renton staff have identified six alternatives. Q. Which alternatives are being considered? A. The six alternatives (Figure 1) can be described as follows: A. building a new pipe -within -a -pipe along the existing route through Cedar River Park and Liberty Park ,4,4�2 l lT-tl B. moving the pipeline under Bronson Way then hooking up with the existing pipe; C. moving the pipeline under Second Avenue then connecting to the existing pipe. D. moving the pipeline under Third Avenue then hookinq up with the Eastside inLerceplor Along Rurno�tt Avenue North; bLh'-ley-' y! WLD U' H : Ob 1 L: PIL I h'U-1,Ul' MUM 1 l.H I 1 UNb I LL NU : l 2UbJ bb/I- 21 .2b "bby POI E. moving the pipeline under Fourth Avenue then hooking up with the Eastside interceptor along Burnett Avenue North; D. moving the pipeline under Fifth Avenue then hooking up with the Eastside interceptor along Burnett Avenue North; Q. Are the alternatives different from the onQs sQ1QctQd for public presentation last year? A. Theme are some new alternatives. The six alternative routes and criteria used to evaluate them are the result of cooperation bewteen the City of Renton and Metro. Staff engineers have worked lvyellrer l.v aeLurmine routes that would best serve the planning efforts of both agencies. Q. What are the benefits of planning arui acuomplishinq those projects jointly: A. North Renton's aging sewer lines and traffic distribution patterns require solutions within the next few years. if Metro and the City of Renton build their projects jointly, there may be less disruption to the neighborhood and fewer costs associated with all of the projects. Q. What if the project isn't done? Will the aquifer be harmed in any way? A. The relocated pipeline will provide more protection for the aquifer because nest et thA altarnativa rntitAQ tAlk4 the JCY-W-J- 7G WCL UU-I'JD Il)-1'IC 1mu-l.UI.11 IUI`I 1UM I IUl`IJ ICL 1`IU. 1. lLuoJ Do,I �1Gb 11707 t"I:JJ sewer line farther away from Zone 1, which is the center of the aqu_irer and the location or Renton's primary production wells. Choosing one of those alternatives would allow for a greater degree of protection should any break occur in the line. The City's wells, which lie between some of the routes and the most sensitive zone of the aquifer, could be used to monitor and pump water if contamination did occur. Q. Will the construction of a new pipeline through the north Renton neighborhood cause damage to structures? A. With newer methods of construction, engineers can excavate and backfill without caMcing e3amagP to nParhy propertioc. Q. what is the desired project schedule"? A. There are two poccibilitiec for completing the project. One schedule would allow the project to begin in late 1993 or early In 1994, after public involvement and the selection of the best alternative. Part of the new trunk line, east of Interstate 405, would be deferred until 1996 or later until 1-405 improvements are completed. Thea llternative is to defer all work until at least 1996. Q. Hhat,.ate the pros and cons of each schedule? A. Tf the PntirA prnjA("t bpgins in 1993, at lPA.et come of the city's planned cower and etrect improvements oould be incorporated into the construction schedule. IL most of the r� pLuject begins in 1996, then the street and utility improvements may be disrupted and the neighborhood would havo construction twice within a 3-4 year period. Q. How long will the construction take? A. 'i'he pipeline relocation would take about four montiib Lu complatQ. In addition, the City of Renton's sewer improvements would take about six months to complete. Q. What are the criteria used to evaluate the various alternative--? A. The criteria are listed below. No order of importance is given. Aquifer protection - Construction impacts - cost - utility right-of-way conflicts Effects on aity's collection system Community enhancements M. CEDAR RIVER TRUNK RELOCATION PROJECT Public Information Document August, 1992 The City of Renton and Metro are seeking public comment on the relocation of the Cedar River Trunk sewer line. This public information document describes the history of the project and the current alternatives for relocating the sewer line. It answers some questions which have been asked about the project at previous public meetings. A public meeting to describe the current alternatives is scheduled for 7 p.m. Wednesday, September 23 at the Renton Senior Center. Other public meetings may follow. Q. Why does the sewer line need to be relocated? A. As part of an agreement with the City of Renton during negotiations over the enlargement of the regional sewage treatment plant, Metro agreed to move the line, thus gaining more protection for the city's aquifer. Six alternative routes have been identified by Metro and Renton staff. Q. Are any other alternatives being considered? A. No. The six alternatives can be described as follows: building a new pipe -within -pipe along the existing route through Cedar River Park and Liberty Park; moving the pipeline under Bronson Way then hooking up with the existing line; moving the pipeline under Third, Fourth or Fifth Avenues then hooking up with the East Side Interceptor along Burnett Ave. N.; moving the pipeline under Second Avenue then connecting to the existing pipe. Each alternative and its rating by the City of Renton and Metro project team is described in this document. Q. Why are the alternatives different from the ones selected for public presentation last year? A. The project was delayed due to emergency relocation of the line away from the I-405 construction. Meanwhile, the City of Renton and Metro began working together to determine the alternatives that would best serve the planning efforts of both agencies. The six alternative routes and the criteria used to evaluate them are the result of this cooperation bewteen the City of Renton and Metro. V. Q. Is it important that this project gets under way as soon as possible? A. No. The project schedule may be accomplished in a number of ways. The planning efforts have identified certain benefits to the city residents if Metro's sewer line relocation and the City of Renton's street and utility improvements take place at the same time. Q. What exactly are the benefits of planning and accomplishing these projects jointly? A. North Renton's aging sewer lines and traffic distribution patterns require solutions within the next few years. If Metro and the City of Renton construct their projects jointly, there may be less disruption to the neighborhood and fewer costs associated with all of the projects. Q. What if the project isn't done? Will the aquifer be harmed in any way? A. The current pipeline is intact and will remain in good condition for a long time. The relocated pipeline may provide more protection for the aquifer because some of the alternative routes take the sewer line farther away from Zone 1, which is the center of the aquifer and Renton's primary production wells. Choosing one of those alternatives would allow for a greater degree of protection should any break occur in the line. The city's wells, which lie between some of the routes and the most sensitive zone of the aquifer, could be used to monitor and pump water if contamination did occur. Q. What are the precise costs and benefits to the city of the various alternatives? A. Tables 1-6 show projected costs and benefits for each alternative route. Q. Won't the construction of a new pipeline through the North Renton neighborhood cause damage to structures? A. Previously, there was damage to some structures caused by construction of a Metro sewer line. Newer methods of construction provide engineers with the ability to excavate and backfill without causing such damage. Q. What is the desired project schedule? A. There are two possibilities for completing the project. one schedule would allow the project to begin in the second half of 1993 or 1994, after public involvement and the selection of the best alternative. Part of the new trunk line, east of I-405, would be deferred until 1996 or later until I-405 improvements are completed. The alternative is to defer all work until at least 1996. Q. What are the pros and cons of each schedule? A. If the entire project begins in 1993, at least some of the city's planned sewer and street improvements could be incorporated into the construction schedule. If most of the project begins in 1996, then the street and utility improvements may be disrupted and the neighborhood would have construction twice within a 3-4 year period. 1 _ . wir METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 August 10, 1992 Dave Christensen Wastewater Utility Systems Department of Planning, Building and Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Christensen: At our meeting with you in July we discussed the need for a public process for the Cedar River Trunk relocation project and briefly outlined the six alternative routes. We would like the City of Renton to participate with Metro in planning and implementing the public information process so that all potential benefits of the various alternatives may be fully understood by the public. Our proposal to jointly plan the public process is based on a schedule that would allow Metro to apply for a Groundwater Protection Grant from the state Department of Ecology. The application has a pre -submittal deadline (90 percent design) of November 1, 1992 and an actual deadline of Feb. 1, 1993. Our proposal for public involvement, however, is not entirely dependent on that schedule. My thoughts on further public involvement are included here, and I would appreciate your additions and/or comments on the proposal as soon as possible: August - early September 1. Metro and the City of Renton will develop a mailing list early in the alternative selection process. This list will include: community members, citizen advisory groups, local professional organizations, affected agencies, local business groups and other interested parties. 2. Metro will contact interested groups and schedule informal meetings to hear their concerns and provide the groups with information. Metro and City of Renton staff would attend the meetings. Water Pollution Control Department 0 (206) 684-1280 9 Clean Water- A Sound Investment Mr. Dave Christensen August 10, 1992 Page Two 3. As soon as the City of Renton and Metro complete a project schedule and list of criteria for selecting the best alternatives, we should jointly develop a Public Information Document. The PID will be produced and distributed by Metro. This document would contain information such as route locations, decisions affecting potential schedules or phasing, cost (and savings) estimates, announcement of a formal public meeting, and summaries of previous and future planning efforts which affect the project. Early - mid September 4. Metro and the City of Renton will plan and hold a formal public meeting to involve citizens in the alternative selection process. The best date would be soon after school begins in early September. The PID could be distributed at this meeting. The City of Renton would preside and Metro staff would be present at the meeting. September - October 5. Metro and the City of Renton would jointly determine the public's involvement in the SEPA process. Metro will prepare the checklist. 6. Metro and the City of Renton would discuss other possibilities for keeping the community informed and involved during the design and construction of the project. Thanks for your comments on this proposal. Please call me at 684-1143 if you have questions. Sincerely, �7 Ron Post Community Relations Memo August 24, 1992 ��� G 2 a 1992 TO: Cedar River Trunk Project Team CITY OF RE^;TON Engineering Dept. FROM: Ron Post SUBJECT: Proposed schedule for community involvement plan Below is a timeline for events that seem to fit within the fast track proposed for this project so far. Please inform me as soon as possible if any of these dates conflict with your schedules. Community Relations Plan for Cedar River Trunk Relocation TENTATIVE SCHEDULE Contact Meeting/Doc./publicity Proposed schedule Neighborhood informal meetings sept. 2,9 Defense Fund mail list flyer announcing pub.mtg sept.8 mail other groups briefings sept.14-18 gen'1 public formal meeting/PID Sept. 22 (could mail PID prior) mail list (public meeting - SEPA) oct. 6 %11AmE-r;;c Clean Water -A Sound Investment Cedar River Trunk date • Relocation February 1992 Metro to reevaluate alternatives to sewer line relocation Last year Metro staff met with residents of the Renton community to discuss alternatives for relocating part of the Cedar River Trunk sewer line. At that time Metro was trying to incorporate concerns from both the Washington State Department of Transportation and the City of Renton. The rebuilding of the Interstate405 Cedar River bridge mandated that Metro move its existing sewer line by May of 1992. The City of Renton had asked Metro to provide additional protection to the city's drinking water aquifer. Metro hoped to meet both requests with one project. At the meeting, the following relocation routes were discussed: Second, Third and Fourth avenues. Use of Fifth Avenue was also considered. The possibility of using the existing route through the park, but encasing the pipe within another pipe or a concrete structure, was suggested. This last suggestion is now referred to as the "utilidor" concept. In addition, people at the meeting requested that Bronson Way be reexamined as another route alternative. After that meeting it became apparent that Metro could no longer meet the concerns of the community, the city and the Transportation Department with one project. Consequently, Metro has moved ahead and is relocating the sewer line for the department about 100 feet from its existing location. This work, phase two of the Cedar River trunk '"'METRO relocation, will start shortly and be completed by May 1992. To meet the community's and city's concerns, and after consultation with the City of _ Renton, Metro will make an initial evaluation of the six alternatives. Metro has also agreed to narrow the six down to as few as three alternatives, using criteria that Metro is working with the city to develop. This is phase two of the relocation project. In the coming weeks, Metro and the City of Renton will be looking at alternatives in terms of cost, timing, traffic, community impacts, protection provided to the city's acquifer and "coincidental benefits" of an alternative to the city's planned projects. Metro will use the information gathered at the previous meeting with citizens and technical information to eliminate the least likely alternatives. When this process is completed, Metro and the City of Renton will schedule another public meeting to present the collected information and receive feedback from the community. Want more information? If you have questions about the Cedar River Trunk relocation project, please call Earl Rice, Metro water quality communications, at 684-1143. You can also write to him at Metro, Communications, 821 Second Ave., M.S. 95, Seattle, WA 98104-1598. Clean Water - A Sound Investment ovessewe but new problems surface By DEAN A. RADFORD Valley Daily News RENTON Metro will begin moving a portion of an aging sewage trunk line this month from the path of the I-405 S-curves realignment project. Although it solves an immediate conflict with the S-curves project, the interim realignment of the Cedar River sewer line still leaves it close to three city water wells near Liber- ty and Cedar River parks and squarely within the city's most criti- cal aquifer protection zone. Metro has agreed to either build a new trunk line north of Liberty Park or encase the existing pipeline with- in an outer pipe to reduce the risk of contaminating the three wells. But construction of a new pipe- line, if Metro chooses that option, would be as much as 1,800 feet north of the wells. It would have to wait until 1996, when the S-curves contractor vacates land that's com- mon to five suggested routes. .The pipeline carries sewage from Maple Valley as well as leachate collected from Cedar Hills landfill and Queen City Farms, a former toxic waste dump. The intent was to relocate the sew- er line before work began on the S-curves. However the project was broken into two phases, according to Metro officials, when North Ren- ton residents opposed plans to route the pipeline through their neighbor- hood. Two years ago, city officials, anticipating the S-curves work, pro- posed that Metro move the pipeline to protect the Cedar River aquifer, the city's only water supply. Dick Anderson, the city's water utility director, said Wednesday it took a year to convince Metro the project was necessary. The city, he said, "got an extremely negative reaction" from Metro when it initially brought its concerns about the line to the agen- cy. Last year Metro finally agreed to the pipeline project as part of its mit- igation for expanding its sewage treatment plant in south Renton. "There has been a feeling in Met- ro that they don't want to do it," Anderson said. They don't put the urgency or concern on the aquifer that we do.." One Metro official, Judy Riley, facilities program -manager in- Met- ro's technical services department, said Wednesday she doesn't feel relocating the pipeline is a good use, of the public's money. `There's never been a leak," she said. None- theless, Riley said, Metro is com- mitted to the project. The full Metro Council will vote today on awarding a $403,496 con- tract to low bidder R'L. Alia Co. to complete the first phase. Anderson said most Metro offi- cials and the city now "share a com- mon interest and a common goal. We're all working this agreement together. " The trunk line project manager, Doug Houck, said the year -long -dis- cussions between Metro and the city included whether to relocate the line.. down Second Avenue in north Ren- ton. Houck said because of community opposition to that idea, Metro could only meet the state's May deadline to move the line out of the way of the S-curves project if it split off the. relocation project so it could devise a plan "everyone can agree to. 11 Now, Metro is looking at 'six alternatives for rerouting the sewer. One alternative would leave the pipeline in its existing location using a utilidor, a utility -corridor that would encase the existing pipeline, containing any leaks. Anderson said the city. ``wants to get the trunk line out of there as soon as possible. It's a threat, to the wells." He still thinks an agreement on relocating the line can be reached that meets the city's needs. Mayor Earl Clymer said Wednes- day relocating the sewer is atop pri- ority in the city's efforts, to protect its aquifer. "How can we ask Bryant Motor! or 40 Rentals to move if we don' ask Metro to move?" Clymer asked referring to provisions in the city proposed aquifer protection ordi nance that . require. businesses b move within 10 years if they can' meet strict controls on storage an use of chemicals. OCi SUMMARY OF 9/29/92 PUBLIC MEETING N3 199? at Renton Senior Center CITY OF. RENTON Ron Post, Metro Community Relations, summarize rtheng Dept. cooperative effort by the City of Renton and Metro to relocate the 42-inch Cedar River trunbk sewer line. He introduced the Metro supervising engineer, Roger Browne, and the City of Renton's Wastewater Utility Systems manager, Dave Christensen. Also attending: Bill Nitz, Metro Water Pollution Control and Rod Schindler, City of Renton Transportation Utility Systems. Roger Browne described the six alternative routes for the Cedar River trunk sewer line relocation. He noted that the existing route of the sewer line allows the quickest travel time for contaminants to reach the city's sole source aqwuifer in case of catastrophe or leakage. Roger described the criteria that Metro and the City of Renton will use to evaluate alternative routes. Engineers will consider: - Impacts to community: homes, roads, traffic and other features of the city. Costs of construction, including hidden costs: for example, savings or benefits provided by one route choice vs. greater costs or liabilities for other routes. -- Right-of-way conflicts, such as underground utilities. Roger outlined the positive and negative aspects of each alternative. He stated that a formal ranking of the alternatives would include the commnity's concerns. The existing route along the Cedar River allows fast contamination of the aquifer if a severe soil disturbance occurs and the line breaks. The Bronson Way alternative runs into a nest of utility conflicts that leave no room for a sewer line under the street. North Second Avenue was the former choice for the route but community has voiced concern about the construction impacts of this alternative. North Third Avenue has reasonably few problems. The extra width in the street - one unused lane Summary of 9/29 public meeting Page Two for the length of several blocks - provides a good working environment for construction crews. In addition, it maximizes cooperation with the City of Renton's planned street improvements and reduces the overall construction impacts of the projects. North Fourth Street contains the heaviest traffic. It also has a large number of other utilities, including a 24-inch sewer line under the street. North Fifth Street is the most expensive alternative. However, there are fewer utility conflicts. Dave Christensen, City of Renton, described the city's reasons for wanting to relocate the pipeline. Ninety-five percent of the city's water supply is pumped from production wells that sit very close to the sewer line. The age of the pipe is one concern, although no leaks have been detected. Relocating the interceptor away from the wells would give Renton an "early warning system" should leakage occur. Other concerns are the costs to citizens of duplicating major sewer lines. Currently, an aging city sewer line runs underneath North Fourth Street and must be maintained. It is possible that line could be abandoned. The City of Renton has scheduled work on alley sewers and local streets (Third Avenue). By accomplishing the trunk line relocation project at the same time as the local sewer and street improvements, there would be cost savings and less overall disruption to the neighborhood. The added depth of the new trunk line would provide better gravity flow and fewer maintenance problems for local sewer lines in the neighborhood. Construction on some routes, such as North Third Street, could accompany planned street improvements. This would mean fewer impacts to the neighborhood over time. Summary of 9/29 public meeting Page Three Community enhancements, such as planting strips along streets, could be paid for partially by Metro. Dave described the initial evaluation process that the City of Renton and Metro are using to arrive at the best alternative. Community concerns are vital to the process. The City of Renton and Metro are committed to a joint project that will work for the local citizens. Avoiding past mistakes associated with construction projects, such as damaging foundations during construction, is a primary concern of all the engineers on this project. The city wants to provide the best service at the lowest cost, but cost will be just one factor in determining a new route for the sewer line. COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS BY NORTH RENTON CITIZENS: COMMENT It seems that to minimize the overall impacts, the better alternatives would be to place the sewer line under Third, Fourth, or Fifth Streets. RESPONSE Temporary impacts to traffic would be greater on those routes, especially on 4th, but work would be scheduled to avoid the heaviest commuter rush. COMMENT On Third Street, there are two major concerns: safety of children and homes, and damage to other utilities. RESPONSE During construction of sewer lines, only 100 feet or so of ground would be open at one time, and the excavation sites would be fenced when no crews were working. Utilities are located before construction begins. COMMENT Traffic on Wells is out of control. Won't this project add to the speeding and parking problems there? RESPONSE This is a valid concern that the city will try to address. COMMENT When this project was proposed for North Second Street, what were the city's and Metro's thoughts on traffic problems? RESPONSE Traffic on Second is the lightest of any alternative, and this is a major reason why that route was originally thought to be the best alternative. Summary of 9/29 public meeting Page Four COMMENT How far does the aquifer protection area extend? RESPONSE Zone One's boundary runs along part of North Fourth Street. The eastern boudary of Zone One reaches out along part of the Maple Valley Highway. COMMENT What type of material will the pipeline be constructed from? RESPONSE Ductile iron pipe. COMMENT What was the feeling about aquifer protection and projects of this type in the 1960's? How do we know we won't be back here in 20 years doing this project again? RESPONSE At the time of the facility's installatin, little was known about the city's aquifer in terms os its potential use, susceptibility to contamination, etc. With the current information available, we feel comfortable with the level of protection that most of these options (north of North Second Street) provide. COMMENT Is there a significant difference in the amount of protection to the aquifer from one street to the next? Does six months travel time (for contaminants) mean anything compared to one year of travel time? RESPONSE As the sewer line alternative gets farther away from I-405, the travel time for groundwater (and contaminants) gets longer. So, as you proceed north looking for alternatives, the farther north you go the greater chance you have of detecting leaks through monitoring wells. There is probably a few months difference, in terms of groundwater travel time, from one street to the next as you proceed north. A North Fifth Street alternative might provide about twice the travel time for groundwater as a North Second Street alternative. The North Third Street alternative provides between nine to twelve months of groundwater travel time. The North Forth Street alternative, which is also on the Zone One Aquifer Protection Area boundary, provides about a year of groundwater travel time. COMMENT Brooks Street has water line problems from past construction and maintenance operations. Can you be sure the pipeline construction won't aggravate this problem? There is an old bog and stream bed under the ground at Brooks and Factory. Summary of 9/29 public meeting page five RESPONSE This is a valid concern the engineers will try to address. COMMENT Why do the alternative routes reach so far into North Renton? RESPONSE The ideal location for the pipeline is as far north as possible (as costs allow) while still maintaining gravity flow in the pipeline. At least 200 feet of separation between the sewer line and production wells is required. Currently, the pipeline comes very close to the aquifer - as close as 20 feet away in some places. COMMENT Will costs go up for residents due to this project or due to the local sewer improvements planned in conjunction with this project? RESPONSE No. The city's project is being funded through rates which are computed for the entire city and not based on specific service areas. Metro's rates are set according to region - wide usage. COMMENT Will other sewer projects take place soon after these projects are completed? RESPONSE The schedule of local sewer improvements is being spread out to minimize the impact of rate increases. The next wave of improvements will be five years after this set of projects. COMMENT What are the costs for relocating the pipeline to North Third, Fourth and Fifth Streets? RESPONSE North Third: about $2.5 million. North Fourth: about $2.75 million. North Fifth: about $3 million. COMMENT: Because of traffic improvements on North Third after the projects are completed, that would be the best alternative. RESPONSE Comment noted. Summary of 9/29 public meeting Page Six COMMENT There are too many cars on North Third already. What if the money for this project - specifically traffic improvements - isn't available? RESPONSE The traffic plan for Liveable Streets is funded. Metro's project would help pay for some mitigation on Third Street if the project is built there. Fourth Street improvements and other projects to take commuter traffic out of the neighborhood are the next priority for the city. COMMENT There are utilities under North Third. Can't the relocated pipeline be put into an alley somewhere? RESPONSE There is not enough room in alleys to put a pipeline of this size. This construction will not interfere with utilities. COMMENT There are underground power lines along North Third and North Fourth Streets. RESPONSE Comment noted. COMMENT This project could put more traffic on North Fourth Street. How will the city mitigate this impact? RESPONSE This project should not increase traffic on North Fourth Street. As part of the North Renton Transportation Plan the city is designing improvements for Houser Way, so that commuter traffic will have easier access to large employers in North Renton. COMMENT To improve traffic conditions during construction, couldn't the Boeing Company stagger hours, and couldn't there be better police enforcement of traffic regulations? Could the city do something about the curb at the end of Sixth Street? RESPONSE Boeing does stagger hours, and Metro will seek the aid of its transit department to contact Boeing about other possible measures. Concerns about the traffic patterns and Sixth Street are valid. COMMENT Please have Metro community relations notify Third Street residents that this street is considered a good alternative for the project and that a ranking of the alternatives is under way. CONCURRENCE /1 I DATE - 5 - 9a CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: November 4, 1992 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Members of City Council VIA: Mayor Earl Clymer FROM: Lynn Guttmann STAFF CONTACT: David M. Christensen SUBJECT: METRO CEDAR RIVER TRUNKLINE RELOCATION STATUS REPORT ISSUE: JW cv*)"'P Due to the proximity of Metro's existing 42" Cedar River trunkline to the City's primary production wells (less than 50 feet), the City of Renton negotiated an agreement with Metro as part of the Memorandum of Agreement for the treatment plant expansion to relocate the existing trunkline. The location of the new trunkline is to be placed such that an adequate level of protection is provided to the City's water supply by constructing the relocated interceptor th ductile iron pipe and providing such separation from the actual well location iat in the case of pipe leakage, monitoring wells will detect the leakage and provide adequate response time to remove contaminates prior to reaching the production wells. BACKGROUND: The City of Renton entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with Metro to reloca a portion of its 42" Cedar River trunklin�ovide a much grea r level of protec 'on to the City's production wells located ttt Cedar River nd Liberty Park. This agreement was executed by the City and 4Vletro in June of 991. Metro, as a result of timing constraints placed by the Washington State Transportation Department for its 1-405 relocation project, attempted to expedite the Cedar River Trunkline Relocation. The results of the initial evaluation performed by Metro and reviewed by the City indicated that from an engineering standpoint, the utilization of North 2nd Street would fAeet the Reed of thre aquifer protection 4ws4w as well as the (or MIA �dces� CdhwwS Kathy Keolker-Wheeler/Members of City Council Metro Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Status Report Page 2 timing and budget for Metro. During the public involvement process, including a public meeting held in August of 1991, there was a significant number of citizens in the North Renton Neighborhood who opposed the North 2nd Street route alternative. Because of significant public opposition and time constraints placed by WSDOT, Metro elected to proceed with an interim relocation of the trunkline to meet only WSDOT's specific needs with the intent to proceed with the planning process on the complete relocation upon completion of the interim improvements. The construction of the interim improvements began in March, 1992 and were completed in June of 1992. With completion of the interim improvements that allowed WSDOT to proceed with its 1-405 relocation project, Metro and the City have been working together to ensure that the relocation project not only meets the needs of protection of the City's water supply but that it provides additional community benefit and limits neighborhood disruption. DISCUSSION: The City and Metro have evaluated multiple criterion when determining the best overall route for the trunkline. The items evaluated include:': • Aquifer protection; • Construction impactsX • Overall costs; C • Transportation benefit' • Utility conflicts; j Effects on City collection system; and • Community enhancements The primary issues evaluated as part of aquifer protection included,,distance from primary wells, ability to intercept potential spills, and the ability to monitor potential spills. The attached memorandum dated April 4, 1992 from the Water Utility provides a basic analysis of the alternatives in respect to aquifer protection. w r� Construction impacts were analyzed from both the contractor's as well as the neighborhood's perspective. Items analyzed include impacts to the neighborhood in regards to compaction/vibration related construction activities, neighborhood disruption, and traffic impacts. Various construction methods are being considered to greatly diminish the impacts of typical compaction/vibration related activities that include: . • Utilization of non -compaction type backfill techniques including high density fill and water settling; • Utilization of low -vibration equipment in installation of steel sheeting in lieu of high impact driving methods typically used; 0 Elimination of vibratory rollers for compaction of roadway sections; and Kathy Keolker-Wheeler/Members of City Council Metro Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Status Report Page 3 • Other items including limiting the trenching area, and sawcutting of the existing pavement. To ensure that vibration levels do not exceed acceptable standards, both the City and Metro will utilize a firm specializing in this field to monitor construction activities. In addition, the City and Metro will have a "foundation crack survey" performed prior to beginning construction that will assist in determining if damage occurs as a result of construction. Overall costs are being analyzed in regards to impact to City and Metro programs, specifically to where cost savings can occur as a result of combining certain aspects of City and Metro projects slated for the area. Cost savings are being identified both from a construction standpoint as well as from a long-term maintenance standpoint. Potential transportation benefits apply primarily to the North 3rd Street alternative due to the ability to perform at least a portion of the improvements identified in Transportation's Capital Improvement Program as part of the trunkline relocation. Other alternatives do offer some minor transportation benefits. Each route was analyzed in respect to existing underground utility conflicts. The analysis evaluated multiple criterion in regards to utility conflicts. These items include: • Establishing a "corridor" in which the trunkline could be located; • Identifying facilities that would have to be re -adjusted to facilitate the location for the new trunkline; and • Identifying and quantifying potential temporary loss of service of some utilities as a result of the trunkline construction. Such items as temporary loss of coordinated signalization, sanitary and water service as well as other items were considered. A key element in the evaluation of the trunkline is the potential benefit derived for the City's local wastewater collection system. Each alternative has been evaluated for its ability to improve the flow characteristics of the local collection system as well as the alternatives ability to assist in the elimination of the City's interceptors that are currently located in the North Renton area. The benefit differs greatly depending on which alternative is selected, from providing no benefit, to providing essential elements to meet the long term needs of updating sanitary sewer service in the North Renton area. Community enhancements were evaluated along each alternative and included such items as planting of median strips, additional improvements that were included in the North Renton street improvement program, and other miscellaneous items that would provide additional enhancement. In addition, we evaluated each alternatives potential negative impact on existing improvements installed, such as previously improved portions of City roadway (i.e. North 1st Street). In addition to the pre -design report being prepared, the City and Metro have established an extensive public involvement program. This program has included Kathy Keolker-Wheeler/Members of City Council Metro Cedar River Trunkline Relocation Status Report Page 4 preliminary meetings with the active members of the North Renton neighborhood as well as a general public meeting which was held on September 29, 1992 at the Renton Senior Center. The residents provided additional insight to the project that is being incorporated into the pre -design report. Because the general consensus reached at the meeting indicated that the North 3rd Street alignment was preferred and because not all those who reside along the North 3rd Street alignment were in attendance, Metro submitted a letter to each individual business and residence along this alignment that included a summary of the September 29th meeting and asked that if they have any comments or concerns to contact either the City or Metro by mail or telephone. This letter was sent on October 5, 1992 and as of the writing of this report, neither the City nor Metro has received any additional response. Attached you will find a copy of the handout given at the September 29th meeting, summary of that presentation, letter sent to the North 3rd Street alignment residents and a memorandum from the Water Utility discussing the aquifer protection aspects of this project. At this time, Metro is finalizing the pre -design report and coordinating with the City its SEPA effort (Metro is Lead Agency). It is the intention of both the City and Metro that the North 3rd alignment be evaluated as the "preferred alternative" for environmental review through SEPA. Upon finalization of the pre -design report, copies will be submitted to Council for your information. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of staff, at this time, that the course of action shown in the discussion of this report proceed as indicated and that staff provide status reports periodically during key elements of this project. C:D0CS:92-898:D1V1C:ps CC: Gregg Zimmerman Attachments It. T)4V�5- C CITY OF RENTON Memorandum Date: September 3, 1991 C-7 u �- J,a w1 G-*�-- AL GT—o 2 C GAT 31 , �N �s ``s�neeri g T�N Dept, To: Lynn Guttmann, Public Works/Planning/Building Administrator Dick Anderson, Utility Services From: AA Jay Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor Subject: Public Meeting Notice from METRO Note the stamp date on the attached notice of the public meeting. If METRO failed to get these notices to residents any sooner than they came to us, the only public notice would have been Monday night's briefing before the Council. We may get some comments at the September 9th Council meeting. If you have any additional information as to the number of people who attended the 29th meeting, how it went, etc., would you brief me prior to the Council meeting? Thanks! "-AMF.TR0 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle. 4N.A 0S11-t-1598 August 23, 1991 Notice of Public Meeting ALTERNATIVES FOR RELOCATING CEDAR RIVER TRUNK LINE On Thursday, Aug. 29, 7 p.m., Metro will hold a public meeting at the Renton Senior"Cerlter on pusSlu-m iiiCriLiata-ve foutes iIof lvlt;uv s I-d..war ..Lvc T—nink seder line. Metro's present Cedar River Trunk line must be relocated from its present route through Cedar River Park and Liberty Park. The proposed route follows the Maple Valley Highway to the interchange with Interstate-405; where it runs north of the interchange and crosses the freeway and railroad line to Brooks Street. From that point alternative routes would take the line either south to 2nd Street (Metro's present proposed route) or north to 3rd Street. A third possible alternative exists on Bronson Way. A map of the effected area is printed on the back of this notice for your reference and clarity. Since none of the routes presents environmental conditions that preclude their choice, it is important to Metro that the choice be made on the basis of engineering considerations and public opinion. People who live or operate businesses along the alternative routes are invited to attend the public meeting and share their thoughts and feelings on which route would be best. if you have any questions, plcase call Earl ivlc`u`-V C6(11-"11 Ui iity reiaiPiui i,v.I at 684-1143. Also, you can write him at Metro, Water Pollution Control Department communications, 821 Second Ave. M.S. 95, Seattle, WA 98104-1598. n f.C(F,OR a(CTNOR CON) M-.1 _ / • L 2n4 SL ROUTE H s \\ ��� �♦ ,\ (PROPOSED) \ I1a wp {ip J/ • T } 1 ! % s { LIBERTY r \\ { A PARK ;,�`\.T g T• :,y BRONSON /[ ROUTE 1L 21 C PLAN t OPTIONS TO CROSS I-405 INTERCHANGE ROUTE 1.1 AVOIDS ALL CURRENT AND FUTURE INTERFERENCE WITH I- {OS WIDENING AND RELOCATION PROJECTS. ([I NO PORTION OF THE INTERCEPTOR WILL LIE UNDER A BUILDING FOUNOAT ION OR BRIDGE STRUCTURE. I+) MAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM WELL HEADS If) LOCAL -SEWER SERVICES CAN BE PICKED UP BY NEW ROUTE. ELIMINATING POTENTIAL WELL CONTAMNNAT ION FROM THESE SOURCES. 1-) RELATIVELY EXPENSIVE. UNDER BRIDGE ROUTE (.1 MINIMIZES COST I-) HIGH TRAFFIC AND PAOJECT INTERFERENCE IMPACTS. 1-1 EXTENSIVE UTILITY CONFLICTS. 1-1 CLOSE TD WELL HEADS OPTIONS TO RECONNECT TO EXISTING CEDAR RIVER TRUNK 2ND STREE- ROUTE 1.1 MINIMUM TRAFFIC INTERFERENCE. I., MINIMUM UTILITY INTERFERENCE. 1*: MAXIMUN ACCESS FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE. IF MEETS .ILL STATED PROJECT OBJECTIVES. AVERAGI, CONSTRUCTION COSTS. SRD STREET ROUTE 1+1 FURTHEST FROM WELL HEADS. 1-1 EXTREM! TRAFFIC IMPACTS 1-1 HIGHEST COST. BRONSON WAY ROUTE 1.1 BEST HYDRAULIC PROFILE. IFI LOWEST CONSTRUCTION COST. 1-) EXTREME UTILITY .ND TRAFFIC INTERFERENCE. 1-1 CLOSE TO WELL HEADS. I \ 4 \ ? T INTERCHANGE ROUT, t (PROPOSED) I CEDAR RIVER PARK / wa LEGEND EM ST B INTERCHANGE ROUTE IPROPOSEDI --•--- UNDER BRIDGE ROUTE ...... S,[ ST ROUTE ------- BRO-ON ROUTE ---- =---- EXIST CEDAR RIVER TRUNN_SECTION 1 EXIST EAST SIDE INTER. SECTIOH I EXIST CITY OF RENTON WATER ti • PRODUCTION wELL. ITYPI -Da v & C - A2 ■ Valley Daily News Friday, August 30, 1991 Metro - Renton - calendar ....... ............... ......... ,. .. Q ; 4th St.� Square dancin' 405 ■ BURIEN - Solo Squares, a rd St. �. mainstream square and round m dance club for singles, is present- <r ing square dance lessons for begin- ners, with the first session taking place from 3 to 5 p.m. Sunday, q�> 2nd St. Sept. 8, at the Promenade Dance ';... Center, 149 S. 140th, Seattle (Bur- S°� The first threefSunday sessions, Existing Cedar ��°� dAi Sept. 8-22, are free. Both singles River sewer ti ._ and couples are welcome, and trunk line. �y.. partners are not required. For infor- mation call 244-8427, 833-8084, \Sewer trunk ``y 839-4841 or 859-2223. The group line alternatives normally meets on the first and third Sundays of each month, from W Renton city well City'''"' 7:30 to 10 p.m. at the Promenade ® Aquifer protection Hall\ "`' Dance Center. area. ■ RENTON - Shindiggers ource:City otRenton Valley Daily News graphic by MARCUS R. DONNER Square Dance Club IS offering dance lessons from 7:30 to 9:30 p.m. every Tuesday, beginning Neighbors protest sewer relocation Sept. 1Hagen'0. BLess ns t e pl S.E.t About 25 North Renton residents expressed Zoncerns about a pro- Renton. A spaghetti feed will take posed project to move a major sewer line away from the city's major place 6:30 p.m. on Sept. 10 to wel- water wells to their neighborhood at a meeting Thursday night. come new students. Call 255-4588 "I think it stinks," said Ray Wautlet, of the idea to move the line to or 885-3608 for information. North Renton. ■ KENT - The Square rooters Residents have expressed concern about the project's effects on their will sponsor square dance lessons homes' foundations, which they say will be shaken and damaged by the starting Sept. 11 at the Meridian construction work. They say the relocated sewer line still will threaten Grange in Kent. The first lesson is the city's water supply. free. For information call 772-0250, Renton officials and Metro are hoping to move the 42-inch line;' 631-2107 or 833-6983, which runs within 200 feet of Renton's main water supply well. Thd ■ RENTON - The Buckskin Kids line carries sewage from Maple Valley as well as material from the invite all kids, ages 8 to 12, to learn Cedar Hills Landfill and Queen City Farms. They say the move would how to square dance. Lessons are provide additional protection for the city's main water wells because it offered from 6:30 to 8 p.m. Thurs- will allow contaminants to be intercepted at other wells if there is a days, beginning Sept. 12, at Apollo leak. Elementary School, 11820 148th S.E., Renton. Cost is $2 per night, the first three lessons are free. Call Correction for information, 255-4109. A notice in Thursday's Valley Daily News about training for Big Sisters was missing some information. The notice should have said that prospective Big Sisters must attend an orientation session before they begin training. The orientation for the September training sessions has already passed. To find out about future orientations, please call 461-3636. Lottery Thursday's Triple Choice 8-8-1 ValleyDailyNews - n.... 1 qn ko r WA QA0gF.n1 qrl Community calendar publicizes events and meetings in the Valley area. Send information to Community calendar, Valley Daily News, P.O. Box 130, Kent, Wash. 98035-0130. For informa- tion call 872.6600. the news Compiled from The Associated Pres.- 0 The sister of chi actor Pee -wee Herm family has received a since his arrest. "It's a difficult situ brother attacked like Rubenfeld said Thurs interview on radio sta WWTN-FM in Nash, "My brother has st innocence and I belie said on the live progr Bart's Roundtable." "He and my famil} have received hundre support, which wear Rubenfeld, a lawy( would not be her brot She was interviewed about the civil rights and others. Pee -wee Herman, name is Paul Reuben, July 26 at an adult me Sarasota, Fla., and cl indecent exposure. CBS -TV later pull( Saturday morning ch ■ Jan Berry, half i surf music duo Jan 8 found a new partner. 50-year-old entertain fan he met during a ci Canada several years Berry and Gertie F she hasn't told anyon she turned 16, will re vows Saturday night Dean concerts at the Convention Center it "What an encore,' singer's publicist, R( Berry's singing pal Torrance, will be W Filip, originally frt Ontario, met Berry d in her hometown. Th been engaged for alrr it will be Berry's firs November 8, 1991 RECEIVED //// ��///�r PUBLIC WORKS DEPT, CITY OF RENTON Gregory Bush Environmental Compliance M E T R O 821 Second Avenue MS 120 Seattle WA 98104 CITY OF pENTON �o `� 31991 WS rY CLERK'S 0mc Reply to: Marjorie Richter Secretary, North Renton/ Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund 300 Meadow Avenue N. Renton WA 98057 Phone: 255-3915 Re: SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance for.Cedar River Sewer Trunk Relocation Project Phase 1 To whom it may concern if anyone:. There is a large contingent of individuals in North Renton, plus the organized Neighborhood Defense Fund indicated by its officers signing this letter, who are interested in the Cedar River Sewer Trunk Relocation Project, phase 1 through whatever higher number there is. We have asked previously and we ask again why aren't residents and our organization notified all along the way of this project. You surely recognize that many people don't subscribe to the local newspaper and even fewer read the small print of the legal notices. AGAIN, kindly add our names and the name of our president, Darrell Igelmund, 3602 Lake Washingtoh Boule- vard N., Renton WA 98056, to the.list of people who are or should have been parties of record in this project. What else do we need to do to get this point across? METRO knows that we protest any move to relocate the sewer line within any resi- dential area of North Renton, especially North lst Street, North Second Street and North Third Street. In fact, we have asked that the relocation, if indeed it must be relocated, be fccused on Bronson Way North or north of North Fourth Street. The relocation can take place along ar iii commercial areas where our older residences will not be disturbed and possibly damaged. This is one of the oldest areas of Renton, and much of it was built on fill over a swamp. Many of our residents have been here ovEr long periods and know the soils and their condition. We are concerned, as stated many times to City Hall and more recently to METRO, about the stability of the soils which could affect our houses and the older materials in them. We will resist with vigor any of the city's or METRO's attempts to use the streets in front of our houses in any way that will possibly injure our properties in any way.. Many of us also wonder about_ the alleged necessity to even change the sewer loca- tion with such high costs to the public purse. We in this area are very aware of the aquifer we live over and want to protect it, but doing it,the way the city and METRO seem willing to do seems radical and unusually costly, and still in the aquifer! Again and again, please add,us, our president and other affected residents to your list of parties of record. cc: City Clerk, Council Sincerely, Public Works In accord: ' Marjo ie Richter, Secretary North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund Versie Vaupel, Board Member PO Box 755, Renton WA 98057 Referred to Utilities Committee 6/10/91 PA ✓sr- C- . June 10, 1991 Q To: Renton. City Council OV RV TC)N Mayor Clymer and City Clerk 0" WOO Dept. rc.1i���C Re: Proposed Metro sewer trunk line through neighborhood Please be advised that this organization vehementaly protests the proposed routing of the Metro trunk line through North Renton along North 2nd, Brook and similar streets. One or more of our members will be at Council tonight to give some of the specific reasons for the objections. We did want to put in writing the fact that we expect an environmental im- pact statement separate from Metro's inasmuch as Renton officials are the ones who have selected this damaging route. If we would have to appeal any decision concerning this North Renton route, kindly advise what process we should follow in order to protect our legal and property rights. We ask that we hear from the Council, inasmuchas you will recall, our group followed the printed instructions from staff last year which took us down the wrong route. We want and expect a responsible decision and correct directions on the process on our legal and/or administrative course of action if such be- comes necessary. Thank you for your consideration. Versie Vaupel, Treasurer Darrel Igelmund, President Mar'' rie Riciter, Secretary ,000f,?_� tv /,i- 'Y 2,0 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 12 1991 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 8/26 Metro Cedar River siting process (Nelson) 8:00 p.m. COMMUNITY SERVICES (Tanner) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT THURS., 8/22 *COUNCIL CHAMBERS (Mathews) 3:30 p.m. R-3/R-4 building moratorium PUBLIC SAFETY TUES., 8/13 Fire hydrant code revision; (Zimmerman) 4:30 p.m. emergency underground storage tank removal; sale and use of fireworks; regional justice center TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 8/15 *AIRPORT (Edwards) 3:30 p.m. Tour seaplane ramp re congestion 4:30 p.m. *6th FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM Airport field use fee; parking standards ordinance; executive session on lease negotiations update UTILITIES (Keolker-Wheeler) WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE MON., 8/ 19 (Stredicke) 6:45 p.m. OTHER MEETINGS &EVENTS LEOFF Board WED., 8/ 14 i 8:00 a.m. AUG 13 1991 CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept. NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the 6th floor conference room (unless otherwise noted). mtgcaL.doc/c 7p/4vL-q- C. Mayor's Office ,�j _../,,, /MIJ C!TY OF RENTON (d e INTER -DEPARTMENTAL ROYJING V 150fore to) ..J�U'L Q(referred by) Please prepare reply for the Mayor's signature on Mayor's office stationery. Please reply to the attached letter for the Mayor, showing a copy to the Mayor. Please supply me with the facts involved in the attached letter. Forwarded for your information; please return. Forwarded for your information and files. X Other: 1iD, , w b) r)A Referred to Utilities Committee 7/1/91 June 19, 1991 To: City Council Members, The City of Renton, Washington RECEIVrE ,'7131-91 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. CITY OF RENTON Subject: Large diameter sewer line which will run East and West under North Second Street Reference: (a) Neighborh ' J" r hat a six foot diameter sewer line will be installed in the future (four or five months) that will run East and West under North Second Street. (b) Teleon May 3, 1991, City of Renton Public Works Department, some subject and ref. Rumor confirmed The North Second Street sanitary sewer has to do with �re�f"Route 405 "S" curve and the Maple Valley sewer tine and Renton water wells in Liberty Perk. (e) Tel.c ey 13, 1991, City of Renton Engineering Department, same subject and ref. T rumor. Rumor confirmed. It is a proposed sewer. V We request that the Renton City Council take the following action: When the subject large diameter sanitary sewer is installed East and West beneath North Second Street, require that its depth be o sufficient to accomodate a oravity flow connection now, or in the future, for a minimum fourteen V gA1�JV"`rJA'�� foot deep (from grade zero) sanitary sewer running North and South under the alley between Wells Avenue North and Pettey Avenue North and that the fourteen foot minimum depth shall be a typical minim.m death for each and every property to accoamodate a basemen; gravity flow sanitary side sewer from each property to the alley sewer. (Note: see attachments 1 and 2). ` e following property owners thank you, \d ewe L Z. s �i C, G ., s f1u� Copies: Dick Anderson, Mike Benoit I cor'� i GO PZAL)4- V1 r-y. LTYPICALI R t'2o Pc-2; Y -i a—, PiAc —. G lZA bca larz LTOP of Tura Snu,-7A2Y Sa--wt--iL IN TNT ALL(_-/ C3N T.IL NOrZ7Fl 51DL NOIL'rN 2L-CANO S71�LL-Y �I_Q 5 �T6 P bF L= CI S?11JG SAKI rmm-/ 5wtlac r �" [-TbP 6f= hljv �,Iau SA+JITrin.•/ �JCW�cIL �rl �L�y Too Qr- 6n1 Lbo2 br-O LLL.�/ VL'hlUL? �27F1 UIcS C(AS7 SCAL(_: IAiLu rr .AL lb Cl E)(C(iPT 1DITAoti/S po',,PaV--,Y LW Lr- W `/ NEW S AU MW Y SEVVEV- T/-IA-' 2un/S Nb21N 5bU7N /A/ ALL(_.7 EAST /VUGS i �'20SS �GL7/o/J LCJOKII/G Moe7'N Fczc xA 1�1627/I 5C-L�uD T4L=L f �Np /07.S ,,2 /07.-1 ATTv Lu r,. q T 2 lb i991=7-rEz- C -rb : AL` i.mN To,,, CITY Coumc-,L v%r-m,Sm1ZS Sur37L`C T ; Lavx c, nl /o7•S 2 i o7. 5 C � h 14 0350 3 !S o355 03,40 ,a/2 ' /6 031,0 0335 // w /7 0345 0330 /0 i v a �^ !8 0310 p g'L5 9 M 1. 20 p390 5 0315 7 O_ Q 21 0395 03/0 6 a 22 006 23 oads z� " 24 0410 n � t 2 S 04/5 h 26 0420 ! iU0 � ;eo 722500 030 �4 = i 09,5 LL OA5 ° 100 ' 1 30 ec /o 7.s 2( /07.5 130 N. 2 N% !E�T, > 9 7 01 AR7701 sAVE) ?OKT101 G7 MA Q o KING CcYJ J TY IET-T. N.W.1/417--Z�- -Pr c a Scf�LG i"= 1 CO' R 3c _MAL Earl Clymer, Mayor July 29, 1991 Gregg Bush METRO 821 2nd Avenue M/S 120 Seattle, WA 98104 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Lynn Guttmann, Administrator SUBJECT: ROUTE ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES CEDAR RIVER INTERCEPTOR Dear Gregg: As a follow-up to our conversation on Friday, July 26, I am forwarding to you two articles from the Valley Daily News. One is a citizen letter written by Ms. Versie Vaupel, the other is an article written by Tina Hilding. The issues that are highlighted here show that there will be strong public interest in the environmental and engineering decisions regarding the sewer line relocation. It appears from the current discussions that the concerns are centering around two points. One, why is the sewer interceptor not being removed from Zone 1 of the Aquifer rather than rerouted within it; and, two, why must the rerouting occur on North Second Avenue as opposed to some alternate route? As we discussed, the answer to these questions will be detailed by the Metro staff with our assistance. Roger Brown of Metro and Dave Christensen from Renton are the project managers. They have the responsibility for providing engineering information, but policy direction needs to come from Dick Anderson, our Utility Division Manager. And, as we discussed, the community relations effort should be spearheaded by Metro. I would like us to be sensitive to the needs of the community by carefully articulating what alternative route alignments were investigated and what criteria will be used to select the preferred route. In addition, we need to provide for public comment of the environmental review documents. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call Dick or me. Thanks so much for all your help. Very truly yours, Lynn Guttmann tp/Metrolt/LAG/bh cc: Dick Anderson Dave Christensen Jay Covington 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 uncil clashes over News photo by GARY KISSEL phanie Hanson. r fire last months' rent, as well urity deposit, Mathena been hospitalized with ;e times since the fire. suffers from an unusual is to undergo blood tests ns can be refilled next Mathena was temporarily as a mechanic at Terminal yet because he's be getting medical cover- ,w when it will start." et up for the two families at downtown Kent. ra said most of the money is been spent in paying for tporary housing. Mathena old probably go back camp- ; at the motel ended today. irmation on a possible two- family could rent is asked to be made to the Kent Fam- Seafirst Bank, 311 Fourth ., 98032. sewer line relocation By TINA HILDING Valley Daily News RENTON - City Council mem- bers clashed Monday night over relocation of the Cedar River sewer trunk line through North Renton. Council members sparred over whether to have a public meeting on the relocation. One side favored having the public meeting, while the other side said such a meeting shouldn't be held without first informing the public. After the meeting, one City Hall observer was moved to say, "if looks could kill, we'd have seven dead council members." The fight began when neighbor- hood activist Versie Vaupel she was dismayed to learn that the relocation had been discussed in the council's utilities committee without public notice. The proposal calls for mov- ing the Cedar River line from near the city's primary drinking -water wells to north of Liberty Park. The relocation proposal had been referred to the committee under the title of "items pending" but had not been specifically mentioned for dis- cussion. While Councilman Bob Edwards said he wanted to have a public meeting to discuss the issue, Coun- cilman Jesse Tanner said the issue should be kept in committee until the public is notified and made privy to the utilities committee discussion. Edwards said that it "seems to make sense to hold a public meeting that everyone wants to see held." Tanner said the council majority will go to "any lengths" to sneak an item by the public. "This council seems to be dead set on bending the rules," Vaupel agreed. Councilwoman Kathy Keolker- Wheeler said she was surprised that a member of the public who was concerned about the public process would object to a public meeting. Vaupel said that the public pro- cess had been aborted by not having the meeting properly announced. She also expressed concern that pre- liminary work on the project has begun, although environmental review hasn't started and a location hasn't been chosen. Tanner agreed. "I don't see how test boring can be done on Second Street without these decisions having been made," he said. Tanner said Edwards was out of parliamentary order, and after fur- ther heated discussion, Mayor Earl Clymer agreed with Tanner that the council couldn't make a decision on the issue without formally taking the item from the utilities committee's jurisdiction. Keolker-Wheeler moved to take the item from the utilities commit- tee, and her motion passed. enton race has 2 more candidates EFF BOND y Daily News ENTON - Incumbent Nemesio ningo and political newcomer Barfield are running for the ton school board. omingo, 44, is seeking his sec - four -year term for Director Dis- 4, which covers downtown ton and the northwest part of the t hill. arfield, 48, will be running to Iplete the remaining two years of ner board member Darrell John- 's term for Director District 5, ch covers the Kennydale area of theast Renton. She will face off inst appointed board member ward Lane, who already has ounced his candidacy. , vehicle maintenance supervisor detro, Domingo is a former pres- nt and current vice president of issues as the reopening of Dimmitt Middle School, school district reforms, expanding the district's multicultural education curriculum and gifted programs. He was president of the school board in 1990, a year of turmoil and division for the district and board members. Clashes were common between Domingo and schools Superintendent Gary Kohlwes, who Domingo criticized for being con- trolling and standing in the way of progress. Whether to extend Kohlwes's contract, which expires in Septem- ber of 1992, is shaping up to be one of the main issues in this year's elec- tion. Barfield was a member of Ren- ton's Capital Projects Levy Com- mittee, but otherwise has had limit- ed involvement in district politics. ,.. . i_ _ A C__ '%A -- Health Services in South King County. She is the community resource program manager for the Division of Children and Family Services. Commitment to the district's chil- dren and helping them reach their potential is her main reason for run- ning, she said. "I have seen kids falling by the wayside and I don't think we can afford to have that happen," Bar- field said. "They are not graduat- ing, they are dropping out. We are just not getting them through the system, and in the long run society pays. " Barfield said she still is formulat- ing her agenda and has not been involved with the issues that have divided board members in the past. "I would vote my conscience r ;co c " RArtield _hl' W M _NdRacEnN Letteps a Children need love, discipline, responsibility Teachers - special people. Children - our precious asset. In a few weeks school will be starting. Let's start preparing our children for school. , There is so much condemnation of our children. Is there really a bad child? I have viewed children from babyhood to 20 years old. The majority of these chil- dren have excellent parents who are real- ly trying hard to bring them up properly. At the baseball fields, the YMCA, skat- ing rinks, bowling alleys, you do see some really nice clean-cut and lady -like kids. If parents have any problems, let us start right in the home to correct chil- dren's problems. Don't expect any school to correct your child's situation. Teachers are at the schools to teach. Parents' job is to train them. The secret of raising children is first love, followed by discipline, and then giving them responsibility. Don't forget to listen to their problems. My own chil- dren are now 40, 39 and 38 years old. I'm really proud of their accomplish- ments. Nothing was handed to them. They started doing field work at 10 or,12 years old, paper routes, restaurants, worked -on the college campus. Teachers are doing a fine job instruct- ing our students. Parents can help a lot by assisting their children with their homework and cooperating with their child's teacher. All children should be given an opportunity to take part in sports, music, art, etc. This helps them and gives them a feeling of belonging and builds up their self-esteem. Parents, in return should attend all of the extra- curricular activities their children partic- ipate; in. This participation may relieve some of the peer pressure they may feel at times. Good luck, kids, as you prepare for another year in the classroom. Violet E. Johnson Auburn Apartment signs clutter up landscape, poles Over the past few years, an interesting phei!romenon has accompanied the recent surge in Kent of housing develop- ments and apartment mega -complexes: the related rise of illegal advertising on telelihone poles and public sidewalks. Please keep in mind that we are not talkiing about the signs which are for yardl/garage sales and will be taken down after the sale is over. The ones we are referring to are professionally printed on sturdy plastic and are wallpa- pere(;l on every third utility post on all roads leading to the complex in question. If you think that we are overstating our observations, count the number of Indi- go Springs Apartment signs along Southieast 208th from Highway 167 all the way up the hill, and again along the Benson Highway from 180th to 208th, and teen tell us that we are exaggerating. First of all, it was our understanding that these pseudo -permanent signs were illegal. A phone call to Puget Power confirmed this to us, as well as finding out drat these signs are also a hazard to the Workmen who must climb the poles and & cost to the customers of the power comliany who must pay for new poles as the news ones are damaged each time nails .are removed. Fukthermore, they make our county and. i ur neighborhoods look like trash. Finally, aren't we all exposed to enough adve-Thising everyday without seeing therri, on the utility poles outside our homes as well? It wouldn't be so bad if the signs came down on a regular basis, but 'there is a Meadow Glen sign on the comer of 208th and Benson that has been there for six months now. In conclusion, let us state that these unlawful and dangerous signs are ille- gal, ugly, costly, safety risks, and we would like to know what is being done to police the situation and remove these eyesores from our community. Addi- tionally, how we can prevent them from further springing up like cancer in the neighborhoods that we all work so hard to keep clean. Ron Peterson Citizens for a Clean Kent, Kent Metro interceptor article didn't cover all issues Your article on July 23 about the Met- ro interceptor was interesting but lacked the most important issues. They are: . 1. The city administration's top man- agement lied to the public. When a citi- zen inquired about Metro's engineers being on North Second measuring and marking the street, the citizen raised the question of what's going on. Adminis- tration employees indicated there was a Metro trunk line going down in front of our houses. However, when the citizen brought it up at the council meeting on June 10, it was denied by the public works director, the utilities manager and chair of the Utilities Committee, Kathy Keolker- Wheeler, because all said that the. Metro trunk line route had not been decided. Then, why did Metro's engineers know that was the route prior to June 10? Why was it necessary for those three officials to decide it was important to lie to the public and some of the council? 2. Why did the utilities chair, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler (whose husband is the head of another department), at the July "i think we are approaching the start of negotiations." - Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir in his most optimistic assessment yet of chances for peace. 15 council meetings announce in general terms that the next meeting of the utili- ties committee would include pending referrals, without announcing specific subjects? How many members from the public would expect such a casual announcement would include weighty subjects about which several citizens had expressed an interest, (and if the process were fair) should have been notified of any such meeting? 3. Your article stated that the proposal to move Metro's trunk line, which inci- dentally, like the traffic going through our neighborhoods, has no beginning or end in Renton, is being moved away from the water aquifer.. Kindly be advised that most of the entire route being proposed along North Second is likewise in the water aquifer, also being in the prime zone, called Zone 1 of the Aquifer Protection Area. Why spend over a million dollars to keep the darn thing in that Don't -Touch Zone 1? If they're going to spend big bucks, for Pete's sake; get it further out of the aquifer's closest zone. 4. The way new Fearsome Foursome of the Council were acting (Keolker- Wheeler, Bob Edwards, Toni Nelson and Nancy Mathews), they didn't have a clue as to what was wrong with the process, or else, as I believe, they have the "arrogance of power" referred to in a book by the same name. We should have had the right at the last utility meeting or another properly announced utility meeting to discuss with our own city staff and committee members the ramifications the commit- tee was privy to and to do so without the presence of Metro who still isn't really responsible to anyone. But then is our own administration and some council people? Versie Vaupel Renton Mary Rothschild City Editor 872-6600 • 872-6721 ValleyDailyNews South King County Compiled by Valley Daily News staff writers Murder trial opens It was a case of a party gone bad and then tragic, ending in the stabbing death of an Auburn man at the hands of the two defendants, a King County Superior Court jury was told Tuesday. In her opening statement, King County Depu- ty Prosecutor Lisa Johnson said Leroy Paul Lozier, 20, and Nouata Nouata Jr., 19, both of Auburn, killed Armando Ortiz-Liborio in cold blood during a fight they started. Both men are charged with first -degree pre- meditated murder stemming from the Jan. 26 incident in Auburn. Lozier is also charged with attempted first -degree murder in an assault on Ortiz-Liborio's brother, Daniel. Johnson said the murder victim was attacked by Nouata and left to get a weapon. He returned to the party and waved it around before he let someone take it from him. Unarmed, he was attacked by Nouata and held on the ground while Lozier stabbed the victim seven times, she said. Gil Levy, defense attorney for Nouata, told the jury that his client might have started the fight but did not know that Lozier had stabbed the victim until he was leaving the scene of the fight. Lozier's attorney, Terry Kellogg, told the jury that his client stabbed the victim, but did it in self-defense. "Leroy Lozier perceived himself acting out of necessity and in defense of others there," he said. Both sides in the case expect to call witnesses from the party. Council unsure of council TUKWILA - The City Council has once again expressed doubts about a new Puget Sound regional council. Previously, Tukwila had been the only King County city to reject a proposal to establish a regional planning council to replace the mori- bund Puget Sound Council of Governments. Monday night the council considered autho- rizing Mayor Gary VanDusen to sign an inter - local agreement to join the regional planning agency. The mayor told the council he would not sign the agreement even if the council gave him permission to. He said he had serious questions about how the regional body would be financed and what ..,.r1....�...:r ,,.. 1,4 nv n, ­innol tr nc nrta_ Aubum ■ Black Diamond ■ Covington ■ Enumclaw ■ Fanwood ■ Kent ■ Maple Valley ■ Renton ■ Tukwila Wednesday, May 15, 1991 Metro to move old sewage line By TINA HILDING Valley Daily News RENTON - Metro and Renton officials are working on a plan to move a 25-year- old concrete sewer pipe away from near- by drinking water wells within the next year. The 42-inch pipe, which carries sewage from most of Maple Valley as well as material collected from the Cedar Hills landfill and Queen City Farms, a former toxic waste dump, is set to be replaced by next May with a lined iron pipe that would be less prone to leaks than concrete, according to Roger Browne, who is man- aging the project for Metro. Lynn Guttmann, Renton directur of the planning, building and public works department, said the city has been negoti- ating an agreement with Metro in con- junction with Metro's proposed sewage treatment plant expansion. Moving the pipe now is advantageous, because it had to be moved anyway for work on the Renton S-curve proj.!ct. The current pipe lies where the state. would Library City Hall 405 METRO ewer Line i as Underground Aquifer Cedar River M..� c..ou .�i Nut ro S—k, �e YI If0 Sun o�T[ Ur wvi(:lB H IXx1N N like to place a bridge abutment. The agreement has not been finalized, but Guttmann said she 'is extremely pleased that Metro has agreed to move the line. There has been continuing concern about the line, which runs above the city's aquifer and within 250 feet of three major production wells at Liberty Park. "It will be moved out of harm's way," Guttmann said. "It's great. I'm really glad they're doing it." The proposal, which carries an estimat- ed $3 to $5 million price tag, calls for removing the concrete line for 0.9 mile between the east end of Cedar River Park and the west end of Liberty Park and moving it north about 1,800 feet. The new line would be made of ductile iron with a liner, according to Guttmann, and have sounder joints to prevent leaking. The new location still falls within the city's aquifer area, a layer of water-satu- mted sand and gravel that provides 85 percent of Renton's water in places lying as close as 20 feet from the surface. How- ever, the line will be further away from the primary production wells, said Dave Christensen, a Renton engineer managing the project. The three wells of concern, Wells 1, 2 and 3, are 20 tp 35 feet deep, and the sewer line runs gat a depth of 7 or 8 feet, according to Christensen. The new line %bill be a minimum of 200 feet away from a lower production well in Liberty Park. Christensen said the new line will be much safer than the current one. "We will keep it as far away from the major production wells as possible," he said, "and there will be a lot less chance of leakage." However, he said, steep hillsides pre- vent moving the pipe out of the aquifer area or further away from city wells. "Short of relocating it in another city, this is the best that could be done," said Christensen. "As long as there is sewage, there is always going to be a threat. We just minimize it as much as possible." Ray Griffin, a Maplewood Heights res- ident who has expressed alarm about the sewer line's current location, said he is happy to hear of the move, but he still has concerns. "As far as I'm concerned, the farther away they can get it, the better," he said. "I just do not like the idea of a sewer interceptor running over any aquifer where people are going to be using that water for drinking purposes." The project still has to go through envi- ronmental review. Metro officials hope to design it this summer and do construction work between January and May. spurs fears By BRENDA DAY Valley Daily News OLYMPIA - A lack of new money for AIDS prevention and services in one ver- sion of the state budget would only increase the social and financial costs of the deadly disease later, worried service providers say. "Once we've, lost the opportunity to prevent a disease, we don't ever get it CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PARRS & RECREATION SENIOR RENTAL APPLICATION NAME OF ORGANIZATION PERSON IN CHARGE ADDRESS NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION YES / / NO / / DATE OF EVENT _ (month) (day) (year) NATURE OF EVENT ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE EQUIPMENT NEEDED PROJECTED COST: AMOUNT DATE PAID Deposit Balance TOTAL COST SENIOR CITIZEN Yes No RENTON GROUP Yes No PHONE NUMBER TIME from to REQUESTED SPACE NOTE: Deposit is due at the time of booking, balance is due on the day of the event. I hereby certify that I am the authorized representative of the above organization, that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, and that the undersigned agrees to exercise the utmost care in the use of Renton Senior Citizen's Center and property and save the City of Renton harmless for all liability resulting from use of said facility, and bound by Renton Parks & Recreation Department Rules & Regulations as indicated on the reverse side. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT PHONE NUMBER (home) work (for Department use only) Requested dates cleared DATE Group Classification Permit approved Date Director's Signature RENTON SENIOR CENTER RULES AND REGULATIONS The Renton Senior Center was established to provide a program of social, health and recreational activities and services for the senior citizens of Renton. This drop -in facility offers the opportunity for fun, friendship, health care, and socialization for seniors, 55 years of age and older. Groups from Renton may apply to use the Senior Center for senior related events during the hours that the Center is not scheduled for City of Renton sponsored activities. It is the intent of the City to make the Center available for special occasions involving senior citizen non-profit groups or organizations who are made up of senior citizens from the Renton community, public information meetings that are of interest to seniors and the general public may be scheduled upon approval by the Park Board. The Park Department does not grant regularly scheduled use of the facility during non -regular operating hours to any one group or organization. 1) The building is available for use outside of regularly programmed hours, only if a qualified staff member is available. A fee will be levied to recoup the cost of staffing and utilities. It is the intent of these fees to recoup the cost to the City for use of the Center for other than normal operating hours. Rental rates are as followed: A. $50 deposit at time of booking (deposit is not refundable unless a medical emergency or a written cancellation notice is received two weeks prior to approved use date). $400 deposit if liquor is served. B. $20 per hour (minimum of four hours) per each custodian for all janitorial, including moving furniture, clean-up, utilities, etc.). C. $20 for use of the kitchen (if requested). D. $20 per hour (minimum of four hours) for each recreation staff member required. E. Qualified low-income senior citizens living in the City of Renton are eligible for reduced rates. 2). A paid City employee must always be in the building during use of the facility. 3) only the rooms and equipment which have been previously requested, in writing and approved, may be utilized. 4) Park Department sponsored senior citizen activities will have first priority followed by City of Renton sponsored events. 5) Marking, writing or attached signs, cards, displays or similar devices in or on the building is prohibited unless authorization is granted by the Director. 6) Non-profit Renton senior citizen organizations may schedule use of the Center during regular operating hours without charge subject to availability of facilities and parking. An annual review of user groups will be conducted to establish priority. The highest priority is given to groups having the highest number of Renton citizens in their membership. 7) All groups must leave the Center and its contents in the same condition as vhen they arrived. All damages to the facility or its contents will be the respon- sibility of the using group who are liable for restitution. 8) Liquor is permitted in the Senior Center dining room only with prior written approval. 9) Smoking is not allowed in the Renton Senior Center. 10) No lit candles are allowed in the Renton Senior Center. 11) The Parks & Recreation Department reserves the right to change or cancel the user's permit if the facility is needed for Park Department sponsored activities. Notice of cancellation will be given at least two weeks prior to the approved use date, unless an emergency exists. 12) The City of Renton is not responsible for personal property. 13) The Mayor's Senior Advisory Board may approve requests for use of the Senior Center outside of regularly programmed hours. 14) The Park Board reserves the right to review all requests and to grant or deny use. 15) Permits are required for all use of the Center for other than City of Renton sponsored activities. Update Cedar River trunk re ocatiomm 91993 January 1993 �Eg RE�S�N G�Ty CF Dept Eng�neer��g Project rescheduled for 1994 Metro and the City of Renton have agreed to postpone the construction of Phase One of the Cedar River trunk relocation project until 1994. Budget considerations have forced this construc- tion project to be postponed, but design work and environmental review for the relocated sewer line will proceed during 1993 for the North Third Street alternative. The North Third Street alternative was supported over other alternatives at a public meeting last September, primarily because it is able to provide a means for transportation and local sanitary sewer system improvements. The North Third Street alternative will provide transportation benefits to local residents. During construction of the sewer trunk line, the City of Renton and Metro will complete necessary road- way improvements to allow downgrading of North Third from a one-way arterial to a two-way local neighborhood street. Before North Third Street is changed to a two-way street, it will be METRO necessary to make signal modifications along North Third and construct other improvements, such as widening, on North Fourth Street. If you have questions about this capital project or other Metro water quality projects, please call Ron Post at 684-1143, or you may write to him at Metro, Water Pollution Control Department, 821 Second Ave., M.S. 95, Seattle, WA 98104-1598. If you have questions about the City of Renton's wastewater or transportation projects in the North Renton neighborhood, please call Dave Christensen at 277-6212, or you may write to him at the City of Renton, 200 Mill Ave. S., Renton, WA 98055. Produced by Metro's Water Pollution Control Department communications section Q34� Printed on recycled paper Clean Water —A Sound Investment �� ITt ETRO Communications Water Pollution Control Department 821 Second Ave., M.S. 95 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 067673253 CAVE CHRISTENSEN CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVE S RENTON, WA 98055 Cedar River trunk: Relocation postponed BULKRATE U.S. POSTAGE P A I D SEATTLE, WA PERMIT NO. 836